HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-09-12_COUNCIL PACKET*
AGENDA
JOINT EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY /COUNCIL MEETING
EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
SEPTEMBER 12, 1988
(Convene Joint HRA /Council Meeting)
ROLLCALL
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JOINT HRA /COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH.? AND.HRA MINUTES OF
AUGUST.1, 1988
II. PUBLIC HEARING - HEDBERG DEVELOPMENT
A. Overall Development Plan Approval /Final Rezoning R -1 Single Dwelling Unit
District to MDD -6 Mixed Development District
B. Final Plat Approval - South Edina Development Corporation First Addition
C. Final Site Plan Approval - Phase I
D. Approval of Amended Redevelopment Agreement
III. ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *)
and in bold print are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one
motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Council
Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the
consent agenda and considered -in its normal sequence on the agenda.
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of August 15, 1988.
III. PUBLIC HEARING AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits. of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing.
Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote
of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable
rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Final Development
Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote
required to pass.
A. Appeal from Board of Appeals Decision - Front Yard Setback.Variance -
James and Linda M. Masica, 6817 Valley View Road
B. Lot Division - Part of Lots 2 and 3, Cassin's Outlots - BTO Development
- Corporation - Fairview Southdale Hospital Healthcare Services Corp.
C. Preliminary Plat Approval - Berenberg First Addition - Part of Lot 1,
Block 1, Hilldale. Generally located north of Interlachen Blvd and west
of Oxford Avenue (Continue to 10/3/88
D. Set Hearing Date (9/19/88)
1. Preliminary Rezoning - PRD -4 Planned Residence District to PSR -4
Planned Senior Citizen District - RRI Services, Inc. and Preliminary
Plat Approval of Elder Homestead - Generally located in the northwest'
quadrant of the York Avenue /Parklawn intersection
2. Preliminary Rezoning - R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2
Double Dwelling Unit District - Peggy C. Erhardt Estate and
Preliminary Plat Approval for Erhardt Addition - Generally located in
the southeast quadrant of the Brookview Avenue/Valley View Road
intersection
3. Preliminary Plat Approval - Edina Highlands 2nd Addition - Steven L.-
Utne - 5257 Lochloy Drive - Lot 6, Block 1, Edina Highlands
Agenda
Edina City Council - September 12, 1988
Page Two
IV. PUBLIC HEARING ON STREET VACATION. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If
Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote
required to.pass.
A. Vacation of Willson Drive - Plat of Edenmoor
V. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
VI. AWARD OF BIDS
* A. Used Hydraulic Articulated Motor Grader (Continued from 8/15/88)
* B. One Ton Paver
VII. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
* A. Temporary.On -Sale Liquor License - Edinamite (10/15/88)
* B.. Election Judges for General Election
* C. 1988 IAFF Contract Settlement Proposal
* D. 1988 -89 Local 49 Contract Proposal
E. Golf Dome Purchase
VIII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS
* A. Construction of Sidewalk - Residents between 60th and 62nd Streets - West
side of Xerxes Avenue
* B. Restoration of Storm Drainage System - Chateau Edina Association, 6415
York Avenue
IX. RESOLUTIONS. Favorable rollcall vote by majority of quorum to pass.
A. Construction of Utilities - HRA - Minnesota Drive from Edinborough Way to
France Avenue
B. Construction of Utilities - Mailbu Drive from Lincoln Drive to 700'
easterly
X . SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
XI. POST AGENDA AND'MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
XII. FINANCE
* Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 9/12/99: General Fund $413,408.81, Art
Center $2,558.07, Capital Fund $13,262.23, Swimming Pool Fund $3,988.15, Golf
Course Fund $25,591.77, Recreation Center Fund $28,851.02, Gun Range Fund
$876.70, Edinborough Park $11,118.92, Utility Fund $223,144.49, Liquor
Dispensary Fund $28,786.19, Construction Fund $6,419.12, Total $758,005.47
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Thurs
Sept
15
Budget Hearing
4:30
p.m.
Manager's Conf.Rm
Mon
Sept
19
Regular Council
Meeting.
7:00
p.m.
Council Room
Mon
Oct
3
Regular Council
Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council Room
Sat
Oct
15
EDINAMITE
7:00
p.m.
Edinborough Park
Mon
Oct
17
Regular Council
Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council Room
MINUTES
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
AUGUST 1, 1988
Answering rollcall were'Commissioners Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner and Courtney.
MINUTES of the HRA Meeting of July 11, 1988 were approved as submitted by motion
of Commissioner Turner, seconded by Commissioner Kelly.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT OF HRA SECOND MORTGAGE ON EDINBOROUGH ELDERLY DEVELOPMENT
APPROVED. Executive Director Hughes explained that at present the HRA has a
second mortgage on Edina Park Plaza Elderly Housing Development that secures the
repayment of the interest reduction advances that the HRA periodically provides to
the development. The HRA is junior to a $14,628,000 mortgage held by First
National Bank of Minneapolis on the building. The developer has secured an
additional $42,800 in a line of credit from HUD and First National Bank to pay
some unfinished construction costs on the property. The developer is requesting
that.the HRA subordinate its mortgage to the additional $42,800 mortgage being
placed on the property. Because the funds will be used to pay construction costs
and will result in satisfaction of all mechanic liens against the Edina Park Plaza
Elderly Development, Attorney Tom Erickson has recommended that the Subordination
Agreement be given by the HRA, subject to obtaining a new opinion of counsel for
the developer and agreement from the guarantors to the effect that the giving of
this new Subordination Agreement by the HRA will not in any way affect the
guaranty.. Following a brief discussion, Commissioner Richards moved adoption of
the following resolution,.subject to obtaining said opinion of counsel and
agreement from the guarantors:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota,
that it hereby approves the Subordination Agreement for the additional $42,800
mortgage being placed on the Edina Park Plaza property;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman and Secretary or Assistant Secretary of
the HRA are directed to execute the Subordination Agreement.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Commissioner Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, motion of Commissioner Turner
was seconded by Commissioner Richards for adjournment. Motion carried.
Executive Director
MINUTES OF THE JOINT MEETING OF THE
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY /CITY COUNCIL
MARCH 7, 1988
A joint meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the City
Council was convened to consider concurrently amendments to the Southeast
Edina Redevelopment Plan, approval of the Tax Increment Financing Plan and
Redevelopment Contract and Condemnation of DeCourcy Property. Action was
taken by the HRA and the Council individually as required.
Answering rollcall were Commissioners /Members Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner
and Courtney.
MIN= of the HRA Meeting of February 22, 1988 were approved as submitted by
motion of Commissioner Turner, seconded by Commissioner Kelly.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN AND REDEVELOPMENT CONTRACT. Manager Rosland
introduced Mr. Peter Jarvis of the development team to update the
Commissioners on the Hedberg Project. Mr. Jarvis reported that he had first
appeared before the HRA approximately six months ago and at that time went
through the Master Plan. Three subsequent meetings have been held discussing
this Plan with regard to the park and the 494 Corridor Study. Fundamental
questions have been asked about the overall tax increment project. Mr.
Jarvis presented the exhibits which highlighted the overall Master Plan with
changes that have taken place since September -- specifically, 110 acres with
high quality regional accessibility characteristics. What has been created is
a mixed -use project with all but three acres in Edina. It has a north /south
linear orientation, picking.up where the Yorktown trail system ends at the
north, winding through the project and then cutting through to the west, tying
directly into the turnaround that has been created on the west entry to
Edinborough Park. Along France Avenue, where the noise level is the highest
and where the traffic characteristics of the immediate site area are the
greatest, a series of non - residential uses are arranged, starting with premier
office buildings in the southwest corner and at the corner of 76th and France.
Included in this area are a major retail center, health and recreation
athletic club, a small office statement and a multi- screen movie theater.
Across the lake, there is predominately housing all the way from north to
south. A minimum of two or three types of housing is contemplated for-sale in
the low scale, and there will also be high -rise rental housing. A hotel is
planned for the Bloomington side. There will be a 26 -acre open space going
through the development which will allow for jogging, walking, ice skating,
cross - country skiing and snow - shoeing. This area would create the - buffer and
also the linkage between the residential and non - residential. The major
changes are in the park area -- specifically, the central park. Both a winter
park and summer park site plan were shown. Criticism has been made regarding
the park structure location with regard to parking. It was suggested that the
park be re- oriented, bringing it to the west side, closer to France Avenue to
give it a focal point entry off of France Avenue. Whatever the configuration,
the retail uses are the most public part of the project, where people are free
to come and go. Mr. Jarvis explained that the environmental putting golf
course could be developed in central park, with central park being enlarged
and the amphitheater expanded. There will be a major tot lot and wading beach
H.R.A. Minutes
March 7, 1988
Page 2
area separated from the lake in a convenient way for parents or seniors. Mr.
Jarvis introduced Warren Beck, the developer of the retail portion of the
Hedberg project as well as the owner /manager of the Galleria. Mr. Beck
explained that the master plan is looking at the expansion of the Galleria and
the issue of traffic linkage. It appears that the juxtaposition of that
transit service is going to happen with a minimum of physical conflicts
relative to the original design concept. The transit analysis is continuing
at the present time, as are the draft EIS hearing period and public hearings.
Mr. Beck commented on where the plans were a few months ago and how the retail
and athletic facilities have evolved. Initially, a two -level enclosed mall
with an athletic facility was proposed. The concept today is the single store,
visibility and single store access, allowing the customers to drive to and
park near the store itself. A 75,000 square foot softgoods store, Mainstreet,
is a concept developed by the Federated Stores. Other stores fitting the
category of those at Southdale are being considered. There are a number of
larger store users that may not be 75,000 square feet in size but are more
than 15,000 square feet in size that have been seeking the Southdale area
locations for some time, and they are being approached. An .enclosed mall that
does not have a high level of occupancy generates traffic and ends up being a
real problem for everybody involved. The timing was fortunate _in the
refiguring of the retail area in that it was the same time there was a push to
bring a larger focus to the park. Mr. Jarvis said that final staging for
Phase I becomes a window to France Avenue with a theater, office building with
a medical office specialty, retail and health club. Estimates have been made
which put an overall park budget together with a contingency in the 9.5 to
10.5 million range and Phase I in the 4.5 to 5.5 million dollar range,
depending on final programs which are clearly not developed at this point.
There will be a drainage retention area to accommodate the Southeast Edina
Plan. Hennepin County is handling the final engineering design on the upgrade
of France Avenue. Mr. Jarvis commented that the headquarters building and the
little building housing the marina's uses have shifted to a slightly different
focal point from winter to summer. The possible changing of the park to the
east side came about because questions were raised about the fundamental
structure of the park, both in terms of programmed activities and dimensional
concerns, specifically whether the amphitheater was a good idea and as well
the lack of proximity to parking in the previous orientation. Consultants and
staff collectively have agreed to take a fresh look at the main features,
especially the major tot lot, the environmental putting surface and the
consolidation of games. A strong consensus emerged that there were a lot of
good things that could be said about the strong visual relationship of the
structure being directly back of France Avenue as well as proximity of public
.parking below the structure. Commissioner Turner stated that the new
configuration increases the accessibility to the park structure for the whole
City rather than decreases it. This way the public has two access streets .
instead of one with a larger parking area, and it is more visible to the
surrounding area. She felt this is a much more accessible location for the
whole City. Commissioner Turner questioned parking adequacy during retail
hours, and Mr. Jarvis explained that the required parking of 500 to 1,000
spaces for retail and 500 to 1,000 for the recreation facility would be
adequate 95% of the time. Parking should not be a concern 11 months out of
the year. A major event in the amphitheater could generate 1,000 people. Mr.
Jarvis reminded the Commissioners that this mixed -use development concept
gives the project a sense of vitality and life, making it unique. He stated
that one of the things he did not want to do was to screen the parking ramp
from the park architecturally.. If the project goes as planned, it would be a
H.R.A. Minutes
March 7, 1988
Page 3
10 to 12 -year schedule until total completion. Bonds will be sold as
necessary, some short term and some long term; the longest period for them
would be 25 years from the date of the first receipt of tax increment.
Executive Director Hughes commented that if it were not for tax increment
financing, the costs would be amortized through special assessments against
the property rather than the version of the real estate tax dollar in tax
-
-increment-financing., Director Hughes explained that if we.-did not collect the
special assessments, it would be a general obligation to the City. He stated
'that the dedication at the time of development involves land rather than
development. In order to develop the land once received, either the general
City budget or the park dedication contribution by all the developers is
needed. Director Hughes commented that the acquisition price is financed back
through tax increments rather than the contribution. Commissioner Smith asked
if the Hedberg project were to be sold piecemeal, what kind of ability would
there be to negotiate and control the ultimate footprints. Director Hughes
stated that we would have to rely on the normal zoning ordinance and that
control would be lot by lot. Commissioner Turner remarked that she would like
to commend the development team and the staff who have worked so hard on this
project. She commented on the traffic, the issue of peak hour trips, the trip
limit we imposed on Homart and whether we should apply our standards to this
project. Having spent one and one -half years working on the 494 study, she
believes development along this corridor has a major impact on our whole
transportation system. Commissioner Richards commented that as enthused as he
was about Edinborough, he is even more so for Hedberg. He would support the
resolution approving the 1988 amendments to the Southeast Edina Plan, approv-
ing the establishment of a tax increment financing plan, establishment of the
district and authorization to execute and implement the redevelopment agree-
ment with the understanding that what is in that redevelopment agreement,,are
the contingencies of subsequent approval of a housing plan, subsequent ap-
proval of the Council as to the EIS and the feasibility of the tax increment
financing and the ability for the capture to serve as the proposed bonded
indebtedness of $19.5 million.-- It is further understood that the indirect
source permit will enable us to impose and make part of the body of that
permit any TDM that the Council feels appropriate and to be consistent with
our trip generation program in what we are trying to do to control traffic in
that whole Southeast Edina area. Commissioner Kelly commented that she could
not vote for this tax increment district at this time. She felt there were
too many unknowns; the housing component is identified in the existing tax
increment district, and the storm water problem is totally in need of cor-
rection. She questioned the building of the whole park, maintenance and
security, and indicated she had unknowns regarding the shortfall agreement.
Commissioner Smith commented.that the shortfall agreement allows us to tax at
the higher rate so we can cover the debt service that is tied to the $19
million. Commissioner Kelly explained that two parcels of this project are
already in a tax increment district -- Parcel C and Parcel A within Southeast
Edina. Her concern was that the City is having trouble maintaining the parks
already existing. Commissioner Turner commented that she intended to support
the project, contingent upon the EIS and the 494 study. Commissioner Richards
introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 1988 AMENDMENTS
TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN,
APPROVING TAX INCREKENT.FINANCING PLAN
88- 1 AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING DISTRICT 88 -1 AND APPROVING
THE LAND SALE AGREEMENT AND CONTRACT FOR
H.R.A. Minutes
March 7, 1988
Page 4
PRIVATE REDEVELOPMENT AND AUTHORIZING
THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY THEREOF
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota
(the "HRA "), as follows:
1. 1988 Amendments to Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan. The HRA and the
Edina City Council have previously approved a redevelopment plan, as defined
in Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.421, subdivision 15, designated as the
Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, and have approved various amendments
thereto (as so amended, the "Redevelopment Plan"). It has been proposed that
the HRA approve additional amendments to the Redevelopment Plan, designated as
the 1988 Amendments to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "1988
Amendments "), which among other things, authorizes the development and admin-
istration of an interest reduction program under Minnesota Statutes, Section
469.012, subdivision 7, to pay all or a portion of the construction period
interest for housing units to be constructed in connection with a redevelop-
ment project to be undertaken by the HRA in accordance with the Plan (the
"Interest Reduction Program ").
2. Tag Increment Financing Plan 88 -1. In order, to finance the public rede-
velopment costs to be incurred by the BRA in connection with the Plan and a
redevelopment project to be undertaken by the HRA pursuant thereto, it has
been further proposed that the BRA approve a tag increment financing plan,
pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, to be
designated as Tag Increment Financing Plan 88 -1 (the "Financing Plan"), which
establishes a tag increment financing district, as defined in Minnesota
Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 9, to be designated as Tag Increment
Financing District 88 -1 (the "District ").
3. Land Sale Agreement and Contract for Private Redevelopment. It has been
proposed that the HRA and the East Edina Housing Foundation (the "Foundation ")
enter into a Land Sale Agreement and Contract for Private Redevelopment (the
HRA Redevelopment Agreement "), covering a portion of the property subject to
the Redevelopment Plan. An outline of the proposed terms of the HRA Rede-
velopment Agreement has been presented to this Board.
4. Approvals. The 1988 Amendments and the Interest Reduction Program are
described in the document entitled "1988 Amendments to Southeast Edina Rede-
velopment Plan" which has been presented to this Board, and the 1988 Amend-
ments and the Interest Reduction Program as so described are hereby approved.
The Financing Plan and the District are described in the document entitled
"Tag Increment Financing Plan 88 -1 of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority
of Edina, Minnesota" which has been presented to this Board, and the Financing
Plan and the District as so described are hereby approved, subject to the
execution and delivery by the BRA and the Foundation of'the HRA Redevelopment
Agreement. The provisions in the outline of the proposed BRA Redevelopment
Agreement presented to this Board is hereby approved, subject to such changes
and additions thereto as are approved by the Chairman and Executive Director
of the HRA, such approval to be evidenced by the execution and delivery of the
HRA Redevelopment Agreement by the HRA. Upon the approval of the form and
content of the HRA'Redevelopment Agreement by the Chairman and Executive
Director, any two officers of the HRA are hereby authorized and directed to
execute and deliver the HRA Redevelopment Agreement on behalf of the HRA,
together with such other documents, agreements and instruments to be executed
and delivered by the HRA pursuant to the BRA Redevelopment Agreement. The
Executive Director of the BRA and the attorney for the BRA are hereby
authorized and directed to proceed with the implementation of the
Redevelopment Plan as amended by the 1988 Amendments, the Interest Reduction
Program, the Financing Plan and the District. The Executive Director is
H.R.A. Minutes
March 7, 1988
Page 5
further authorized and directed to request the appropriate authorities of
Hennepin County to certify the original assessed value of the District
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177 following (i) approval of the
Financing Plan and District by the Edina City Council in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision 3, and (ii) the execution and
.delivery by the HRA and the Foundation of the HRA Redevelopment Agreement.
5. Interest Reduction Program. This _Board acknowledges that in developing
and approving the Interest Reduction Program it has considered (i) the
availability and affordability of other government housing programs, (ii) the
availability and affordability of private market financing; and (iii) the need
for additional affordable mortgage credit to encourage the.construction and
enable the purchase of housing units within the jurisdiction of the HRA. This
Board further acknowledges that the approval hereby given to the 1988
Amendments and the Interest Reduction Program authorizes all of the interest
reduction assistance payments thereunder whether made prior to or after
January 1, 1989.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Commissioner Smith.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Kelly
Resolution adopted.
Member Richards then introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING 1988 AMENDMENT TO
THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN 88 -1
FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 88 -1,
MAKING FINDINGS AND REQUESTING CERTIFICATION
OF THE'TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 88 -1
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows:
1. 1988 Amendment to Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan. This Council and
the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA ") have
previously approved a redevelopment plan and redevelopment project under
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.001 to 469.047, designated as the Southeast
Edina Redevelopment Plan, and have approved various amendments thereto (the
"Redevelopment Plan"). At the request of the HRA, this Council held a public
hearing on amendments to the Redevelopment Plan in accordance with Minnesota
Statutes, Section 469.029, subdivision 6. The amendments are designated as
the 1988 Amendments to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "1988
Amendments "). The 1988 Amendments, among other things, authorize the
development and administration by the BRA of an interest reduction program
under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.012, subdivision 7, to pay all or a
portion of the construction period interest for housing units to be
constructed in connection with a redevelopment project to be undertaken by the
ERA in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan (the "Interest Reduction
Program ").
2. Tax Increment Financing Plan. At the request of the HRA, this Council has
held a public hearing on a tax increment financing plan of the HRA, as defined
in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, designated as Tag Increment Financing
Plan 88 -1 (the "Tag Increment Financing Plan"), covering a portion of the
property included in the area covered by the Redevelopment Plan. The Tag
Increment Financing Plan establishes a tag increment financing district, as
defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 9, designated as
Tag Increment Financing District 88 -1 (the "District ").
3. Approvals. The 1988 Amendments are hereby approved. The Tag Increment
H.R.A. Minutes
March 7, 1988
Page 6
Financing Plan is hereby approved, subject to the execution and delivery by
the HRA and the East Edina Housing Foundation (the "Foundation ") of the Land
Sale Agreement and Contract for Private Redevelopment (the "HRA Redevelopment
Agreement") by and between the HRA and the Foundation. Upon the execution and
delivery by the HRA and the Foundation of the HRA Redevelopment Agreement, the
Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute and
deliver on behalf of the City the Consent of the City attached to the HRA
Redevelopment Agreement, together with such other documents, agreements and
instruments to be executed and delivered by the City pursuant to the HRA
Redevelopment Agreement.
4. Findings.With Respect to District Constituting Redevelopment District.
This Council finds that the District is a redevelopment district within the
scope of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 10, for the
following reasons: (i) less than 70 percent of the parcels in the District
are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities or other improvements, (ii)-as
shown by the Real Estate Consulting Analysis dated September 15, 1987,
prepared for the HRA by Robert Boblett Associates, Inc., due to unusual
terrain or soil deficiencies requiring substantial filling, grading or other
physical preparation for use at lease 802 of the total acreage of land in the
District has a fair market value upon inclusion in the District, which when
added to the cost of preparing that land for development, excluding costs
directly relating to roads as defined in Section 160.01 and local improvements
as described in Section 429.021, subdivision 1, clauses 1 to 7, 11 and 12 and
430.01, exceeds its anticipated fair market value after completion of the
preparation; and (iii) upon the execution and delivery by the HRA and the
Foundation of the HRA Redevelopment Agreement, the HRA will have concluded an
agreement for the development of at least 50X of the acreage in the District
having the unusual soil or terrain deficiencies, which agreement provides
recourse to the HRA should the development not be completed.
5. Findings With Respect to Redevelopment Plan. Pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Section 469.028, subdivision 2, it is hereby found that:
(A) The land located within the area to be subject to the Interest Reduction
Program would not be made available for redevelopment without financial aid
sought; (B) The Redevelopment Plan as amended by the 1988 Amendments will
afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a
whole, for the redevelopment of the areas covered thereby by private
enterprise; and (C) The Redevelopment Plan as amended by the 1988 Amendments
conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole.
6. Findings Under Tax Increment Financing Act. Pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision 3, it is hereby found that:
(A) The District is a redevelopment District as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 469.174, subdivision 10, for the reasons set forth in Section 4
hereof; (B) The proposed development to be undertaken in accordance with the
Redevelopment Plan as amended by the 1988 Amendment in the opinion of this
Council would not occur solely through private investment within the
reasonably foreseeable future and therefor the use of tax increment financing
is deemed necessary; (C) The Tax Increment Financing Plan conforms to the
general plan for the development of the City as a whole; (D) The Tax Increment
Financing Plan will afford maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs
of the City as a whole for the development of the District by private
enterprise; and (E) The City elects the method of tax increment computation
set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, subdivision 3, clause (a).
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Smith.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
.,
H.R.A. Minutes
March 7, 1988.
Page 7
Nays: Kelly
Resolution adopted.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE
ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY BY PROCEEDINGS IN EMINENT DOMAIN.
Commissioner Richards introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
- RESOLUTION DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR
AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN
PROPERTY BY PROCEEDINGS IN ffiU[NENT DOMAIN
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), as follows:
1. The HRA has previously approved a redevelopment plan, as defined in
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.001, subdivision 16, designated as the
Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the 'Original Plan "), and has approved
various amendments to the Original Plan, including, but not limited to, an
amendment designated as the 1987 Amendment to the Southeast Edina
Redevelopment Plan (the "1987 Plan Amendment "), approved by a resolution
adopted by this Board on June 15, 1987 (the Original Plan as so amended by the
1987 Plan Amendments and the other amendments to the Plan is herein referred
to as the "Plan ").
2. It is hereby determined that the acquisition by the HRA of the following
described property which is included in the area subject to the Plan is
necessary to carry out the 1987 Project, as defined in the 1987 Plan
Amendment, which 1987 Project was approved by the HRA in the 1987 Plan
Amendment and constitutes a redevelopment project, as defined in Minnesota
Statutes, Section 469.001, subdivision 14:
That part of the East 1/2 of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest
Quarter, Section 32, Township 28, Range 24 lying West of a line drawn
North parallel to the East line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section
32 from a point on the south line thereof 1659.625 feet West of the
Southeast corner of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 32, according
to the government survey thereof.
3. The Executive Director of,the HRA and attorney for the HRA are authorized
and directed on behalf of the HRA to acquire the property described in
paragraph 2 above by the exercise of the power of eminent domain pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 117, and is specifically authorized to notify the
owners of intent to take possession pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section
117.042. The Executive Director of the HRA and attorney for the HRA are
further authorized to take all actions necessary or desirable to carry out the
purposes of this resolution.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Commissioner Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
There being no further business on the agenda of the joint meeting of the HRA
and City Council, Commissioner /Member Kelly moved adjournment. Motion was
seconded by Commissioner /Member Turner and carried.
Executive Director
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN; RATIFYING AND AFFIRMING THE EXECUTION
OF DOCUMENTS AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City "),
as follows:
1. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA ")
and the Edina City Council have previously approved a redevelopment plan, as
defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 469.002, subdivision 16, designated as the
Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan "). Acting pursuant to the Plan the
HRA proposed to acquire certain land in the area included in the Plan and to sell
and transfer a portion of such land to the East Edina Housing Foundation (the
"Foundation "), pursuant to a Land Sale Agreement by and between the HRA and the
Foundation dated on or as of March 14, 1988 (the "Agreement "). Pursuant to a
resolution dated March 14, 1988, the City approved the form of a consent (the
"Consent ") by the City attached to the Agreement. Pursuant to such authorization
the Mayor and City Manager executed and delivered such Consent. It is now
proposed that the Agreement be amended and restated and an Amended and Restated
Land Sale Agreement and Contract for Private Redevelopment (the "Amended
Agreement ") be entered into between the HRA and the Foundation. The Amended
Agreement provides for the execution of a consent by the City (the "Amended
Consent "). A form of the Amended Consent is attached as an exhibit to the Amended
Agreement. A draft of the Amended Agreement has been prepared and submitted to
the City and is hereby directed to be filed with the City Clerk.
2. The execution and delivery by the Mayor and City Manager of the Consent
to the Agreement is hereby ratified and affirmed.
3. The form of the Amended Consent is hereby approved subject to such
modifications as are deemed appropriate and approved by the city attorney and the
City Manager, which approval shall be conclusively evidenced by the execution of
the Amended Consent by the Mayor and City Manager. The Mayor and City Manager are
directed to execute the Amended Consent upon execution of the Amended Agreement by
the HRA and the Foundation. The Mayor and City Manager are also authorized and
directed to execute such other instruments as may be required to give effect to
the transaction herein contemplated.
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT
FOR SOUTH EDINA DEVELOPMENT ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "SOUTH EDINA DEVELOPMENT ADDITION ", platted by Kenneth M.
Anderson, Personal Representative of the Estate of Fred W. Hedberg, deceased
and unmarried, John W. Hedberg and Jean Hedberg, husband and wife, Michael T.
DeCourcy, also known as Michael DeCourcy, and Merry L. DeCourcy, husband and
wife, Michael T. DeCourcy as attorney in fact for Donald DeCourcy and Catherine L.
DeCourcy, also known as Catherine DeCourcy, husband and wife, Elizabeth T. DeCourcy,
an unremarried widow, Cecilia Talbot, a single person, and Bertram Talbot, a
single person, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of
September 12, 1988, be and is hereby granted final plat approval.
ADOPTED this 12th day of September, 1988.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and
correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its
regular meeting of September 12, 1988 and as recorded in the Minutes of said
regular meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 3rd day of October, 1988.
City Clerk
A.
o e �
ch
.. • �NR7RPON'S'�9 •
ass
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL, HRA
MEMBERS
From: KENNETH . ROSLAND
Date: SEPTEMBER 12, 1988
Subject:
HEDBERG DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
Recommendation:
Approval of Resolutions attached.
Info /Background:
Agenda Item # HRA II
Consent 0
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
❑ To Council
Action ❑ Motion
0 Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
See attached memorandum of September 9, 1988.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
FROM: KENNETH RbSLAND
SUBJECT: HEDBERG PROJECT
DATE: SEPTEMBER 12, 1988
On September 12, 1988, the Council /HRA will review an overall
development plan and final plat for the entire Hedberg property as well
as .final site plans for Phase I of the project. At the same time, the
Council /HRA will be asked to authorize execution of an Amended
Redevelopment Agreement and other documents relative to the project.
The following summarizes the major points of these documents.
1. PHASE I LAND OWNERSHIP
a. The HRA will purchase the north park, central park, all
necessary right -of -way for Minnesota Drive. W. 76th Street,
Parklawn Avenue, Edinborough Luray, and France Avenue, and
Parcel C. which will be developed with 276 condominium units.
b. Private. Private development entities will purchase Parcels
B -1. B -2. D and F -3.
2. PHASE I DEVELOPMENT
a. The City will agree to grade the property and Minnesota Drive,
West to 76th Street, Edinborough Way, and the west one -half of
Parklawn Avenue. City costs for this work will be assessed
against the Phase I' land including the land acquired by the
HRA.
b. HRA. The HRA will commit to expend up to $3.8 million toward
the development of central park and north park plus it will
develop the storm water retention ponds on central and. north
park. The HRA will also commit to improvements beneficial to
the condominiums such as landscaping, parking lots, utilities
and lighting in a manner similar to the HRA improvements
undertaken for the Edinborough Condominiums.
C. Private.
i). Private development will start within sixty (60) days of
closing.
B -1. A partnership including Gabbert and Beck, will construct
a 2,664 seat theatre.
B -2. France Med Associates will construct a 106,900 square
foot office building..
D. Gabbert and Beck will commence construction of at least
one -half of a 200,000 square foot retail complex.
ii). Phase I Condominiums will start but not later than June
1, 1989.
iii).No specific commencement date is provided for the F -3
office.
3. PHASE 1 - PUBLIC COSTS
Land
$
8.0
million
Park Dedication
$
1.9
million
Special Assessments
$
2.3
million
Park & Transit Storage
$
800,000
Park Development
$
3.8
million
Pond. Development
$
200,000
Housing Improvements
$
3.0
million
Contingencies & Soft Cost
$
1.7
million
$21.7
million
4. HRA AND CITY CONTRIBUTION
FROM DEVELOPER
a) Phase I - Guaranteed
Closing $500,000
- First Anniversary of Closing - $1.1 million plus interest
- Fourth Anniversary of Closing - $1.4 million plus interest
b) Future Phases. Not guaranteed
$2.0 million as future phases proceed
5. PARR DEVELOPMENT PRIORITY
The HRA agrees that, if affordable, the following park acquisition'
and development will be pursued in the following priority.
Complete Central Park
Complete.west side of North Park
Acquire South Park
- Construct South Park
Complete west side
6. HOUSING PROGRAM
The proposed Phase
Edinborough. The ma
Average Unit Size
Average Sale Price'.
Range of Prices
of South Park
I housing program is very' similar -to
jor features of the program are as follows:
1,033 sq. ft.
$87,848.
$60,000 - $111,000
Second Mortgage Pool
Direct Subsidy $650,000/phase
Second Mortgages $193,000/phase
Incomes Served $20,000 - $34,000
7. TAX INCREMENT ANALYSIS
The feasibility of tax increment financing for the project has been
analyzed using a variety of assumptions. We conclude that adequate
cash flows will exist from the present tax increment district and
the proposed Phase I development to pay principal and,interest on
bonds which will be issued to finance the public costs. This
conclusion is based, however, on the assumption that properties in
the.tax increment financing district will inflate in value on the
average of.at least 2 -3 percent annually and that future changes in
the State Property Tax laws will not significantly reduce taxes
from the tax increment district. It should be noted that property
values in Edina have inflated an average of 7% annually for the
past ten (10) years.. If properties did not inflate at 2 -3 percent,
or if tax collections were significantly reduced, deficits could
result that would require short -term borrowing from the City to the
HRA to meet HRA obligations. Even if this occurred, however, we
would expect that excess increments would be generated in future
years to repay the City.
8. ANALYSIS OF RISKS
a) Tax increment adequacy: As noted above, sufficient increments
may not exist due to reduced inflation,rates or changes in tax
laws. We have attempted to reduce our risk by way, of a
Shortfall Agreement and an Assessment Agreement.
i) Shortfall Agreement. The Shortfall Agreement guarantees
that a minimum tax will be generated from the Phase-I Hedberg
development even if elements of the Phase I project are not
actually constructed. This commitment is guaranteed ' by
Northland Land Company, the parent company of the developer.
After completion of each of the Phase I buildings, the
- - -- Shortfall agreement terminates as to the completed building
and is replaced by the Assessment Agreement.
ii) Assessment Agreement - The Assessment Agreement provides
that the owner of each of the Phase I buildings will not
contest an assessor's estimated market value needed to
generate the minimum tax expected to be paid by the building.
Assuming that owners actually
Shortfall Agreement and the Ass
guarantee that the tax increment
the Phase I development will
however, assume the risk that
sufficient to repay bonds.
pay their tax bill, the
assment Agreement in essence
which we are expecting from
occur. The HRA /City will,
this tax increment will be
The 1988 property tax law provides that effective for Payable
1990, the Homestead Credit is scheduled to be repealed and
replaced by an,aid program called Transition Aid. Unlike the
old Homestead Credit reimbursement program, the Transition Aid'
will not be paid to tax increment districts. . Thus, TIF
districts with homesteaded property could see a decline in
revenues beginning in Payable 1990. It is our understanding
the Legislature, intends to change this feature of the new
property tax system. At present, however, this should be
viewed as a risk to the cash flow of the tax increment
district that could result in borrowing from the City.
b) Construction of Phase /Developments,
In connection with the closing of Phase 1, the private
development entities referred to earlier will purchase land at
a cost of approximately $5.5 million.
Although the developer will execute the Shortfall Agreement
noted earlier, there is not an absolute guarantee that the
construction of Phase 1 will commence as expected. We
believe, however, that the purchase of the property and the
execution of the Shortfall Agreement should give the HRA the
comfort that the project will proceed.
C) Sale of Bonds Before Closing
We are attempting to close the Hedberg land sale before
October 15, in order to obtain exempt status for real estate
taxes payable 1989 for the publicly owned property. In order
to close on October 15, the HRA must have proceeds from a land
sale. To have such proceeds, the Council must authorize the
sale on October 3. If the bonds are sold on October 3, and
the Hedberg transaction never closes, the City /HRA may incur
negative arbitrage until bonds are callable in ten (10) years
(Negative arbitrage results when land proceeds are invested at"
a lower interest rate than the bond interest rate). Such
negative arbitrage will be financed with excess increments
from the existing tax increment district.
9. POST PHASE I
Land which is not purchased in Phase 1 is. subject to a non- recourse
contract for deed to the HRA which must be serviced by the
developer. 'The developer retains an option to acquire and develop
future phases of the project. If the developer defaults in keeping
the contract for deed in force, the HRA may keep the contract in
force and negotiate with another developer.
10. HRA AND COUNCIL ACTIONS
The proposed schedule is as follows:
September 12, 1988:
CITY: Final rezoning to Mixed Development District -6,
final plat approval, and final site plan approval for
Phase 1.
HRA: Approval of amended Redeveloper's Agreement.
September 19, 1988:
Call for bond sale.
October 3, 1988:
Open bids and award General Obligation Bonds.
Award low bid for Minnesota Drive.
October 14, 1988.
Closing.
Member introduced the
following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE SOUTHEAST
EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN; RATIFYING AND AFFIRMING
THE EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS AND AUTHORIZING
THE EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Edina, Minnesota (the "City "), as follows:
1. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of
Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA ") and the Edina City Council have
previously approved a.redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota
Statutes Section 469.002, subdivision 16, designated as the
Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan "). Acting
pursuant to the Plan the HRA proposes to acquire certain
land in the area included in the Plan and to sell and transfer
a portion of such land to the East Edina Housing Foundation
(the "Foundation "), pursuant to a Land Sale Agreement by
and between the HRA and the Foundation dated on or as of
March 14, 1988 (the "Agreement "). Pursuant to a resolution
dated March 14, 1988, the City approved the form of a consent
(the "Consent ") by the City attached to the Agreement. Pursuant
to such authorization the Mayor and City Manager executed
and delivered such Consent. It,is now proposed that the
Agreement be amended and restated and an Amended and Restated
Land Sale Agreement and Contract for Private Redevelopment
(the "Amended Agreement ") be entered into between the HRA
and the Foundation. The Amended Agreement provides for the
execution of a consent by the City (the "Amended Consent ").
A form of the Amended Consent is attached as an exhibit to
the Amended Agreement. A draft of the Amended Agreement
has been prepared and submitted to the City and is hereby
directed to be filed with the City Clerk.
2. The execution and delivery by the Mayor and
City Manager of the Consent to the Agreement is hereby ratified
and affirmed.
3. The form of the Amended Consent is hereby approved
subject to such modifications as.are deemed appropriate and
approved by the city attorney and the City Manager, which
approval shall be conclusively evidenced by the execution
of the Amended Consent by the Mayor and City Manager. The
Mayor and City Manager are directed to execute the Amended
Consent upon execution of the Amended Agreement by the HRA
and the Foundation. The Mayor and City Manager are also
authorized and directed to execute such other instruments
as may be required to give effect to the transaction herein
contemplated.
Dated this day of September, 1988.
-- Chairman
Attest:
Executive Director
The motion for-the adoption of the foregoing resolution
was duly seconded by Commissioner and
upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted and
was signed by the Chairman and his signature attested by the
Executive Director.
-2-
Commissioner
following resolution and moved its adoption:
introduced the
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE SOUTHEAST
EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN; RATIFYING AND
AFFIRMING THE EXECUTION OF VARIOUS AGREEMENTS
AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF VARIOUS
OTHER DOCUMENTS
BE .IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of
the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota
(the "HRA "), as follows:
1. Recitals. The HRA and the Edina City Council
have previously approved a redevelopment plan, as defined
in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.002, subdivision 16,
designated as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the
"Plan "). Acting pursuant to the Plan the HRA proposes to
acquire certain land in the area included in the Plan and
to sell.and transfer a portion of such land to the East Edina
Housing Foundation (the "Foundation "), pursuant to a Land
Sale Agreement by and between the HRA and the Foundation
(the "Agreement "). By a resolution adopted March 14, 1988,
the HRA approved the form of the Agreement and authorized
any two officers of the HRA to.execute and deliver the Agreement
on behalf of the HRA with such modifications as are deemed
appropriate and approved by the Attorney for the HRA and
the Executive Director of the HRA. Pursuant to such
authorization the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the HRA have
executed and delivered the Agreement to the Foundation, which
Agreement is dated on or as of-March 14, 1988. It is now
proposed that the Agreement be amended and restated and an
Amended and Restated Land Sale Agreement and Contract for
Private Redevelopment between the HRA and the Foundation
(the "Amended Agreement ") has been presented to and reviewed
by the HRA.
2. Approval of Sale of Land. A public hearing
on the sale of the Land to the Foundation was held by the
HRA on September 12, 1988. The sale of the Land to the
Foundation pursuant to the Amended Agreement is hereby approved.
3. Ratification of Execution and Delivery of
Agreement. The execution and delivery of the Agreement dated
on or as of March 14, 1988 by the Chairman and Vice Chairman
of the HRA is hereby ratified and affirmed.
4. Authorization for Execution and Delivery of.
Further Documents. The form of the Amended Agreement is
hereby approved subject to such modifications as are deemed
appropriate and approved by the attorney for the HRA and
V r
the Executive Director of.the HRA, which approval shall be
conclusively evidenced by the execution of the Amended Agreement
by any two officers of the HRA. Any two officers of the
HRA are directed to execute the Amended Agreement. Any two
officers of the HRA are also authorized and directed to execute
such other instruments as may be required to accomplish the
transaction herein contemplated including but not limited
to any amendments or supplements to the Amended Agreement
and _other agreements as may be necessary to accomplish the
transactions contemplated by the Amended - Agreement. The
execution of any such amendments, supplements or.agreements
by any two officers of the HRA .shall be conclusive evidence
of the approval of such documents by the HRA in accordance
with this Resolution.
Dated this day of September, 1988.,
Attest:
Executive Director
Chairman
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution
was duly seconded by Commissioner and
upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted
and was signed by the Chairman.and.his signature attested
by the Executive Director.
-2
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT
FOR SOUTH EDINA DEVELOPMENT ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "SOUTH EDINA DEVELOPMENT ADDITION ", platted by Kenneth M.
Anderson, Personal Representative of the Estate of Fred W. Hedberg, deceased
and unmarried, John W. Hedberg and Jean Hedberg, husband and wife, Michael T.
DeCourcy, also known as Michael DeCourcy, and Merry L. DeCourcy, husband and
wife, Michael T. DeCourcy as attorney in fact for Donald DeCourcy and Catherine L.
DeCourcy, also known as Catherine DeCourcy, husband and wife, Elizabeth T. DeCourcy,
an unremarried widow, Cecilia Talbot, a single person, and Bertram Talbot, a
single person, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of
September 12, 1988, be and is hereby granted final plat approval.
ADOPTED this 12th day of September, 1988.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and
correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its
regular meeting of September 12, 1988 and as recorded in the Minutes of said
regular meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 3rd day of October, 1988.
City Clerk
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
AUGUST- 15, 1988
Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner and Mayor Courtney.
UNITED WAY PROCLAMATION PRESENTED. Mayor Courtney presented the following
proclamation:
PROCLAMATION FOR 1988 EDINA COMMUNITY CAMPAIGN
WHEREAS, the United Way of Minneapolis Area currently provides funding to more
than 360 programs in 116 agencies, many of which are located in and serving
suburban communities. For example, agencies in Edina range from Ebenezer Society,
which offers support and training for family caregivers, to the Bloomington Public
Health Service which provides a family support program, to Storefront/Youth
Action, where victims of physical and sexual abuse can find individual and group
counseling; and
WHEREAS, the efforts of thousands of community volunteers enable the United Way to
maintain fundraising and administrative costs at under ten cents to a dollar; and
WHEREAS, in 1988 funds are being distributed to quality programs that reach more
people in suburban communities. The United Way works with county planning boards
and private planning groups to identify gaps in services in a continuing effort to
meet the comprehensive needs of people in the six county service area;
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Council of Edina hereby support the
UNITED WAY'S EDINA COMMUNITY CAMPAIGN
on September 8, 1988, and encourage local businesses and their employees to
participate in this event.
PROCLAIMED this 15th day of August, 1988.
CENTENNIAL FLOWER GARDEN AWARDS PRESENTED. Perry Anderson, sponsor, presented
Centennial Flower Garden Awards to the following contestants: Churches.- Grace
Church; Multi- Residences - Point of France and Rembrandt Retirement Community;
Residential - Vic /Pat Kreuziger, 6705 Cheyenne Trail;. Jackie Hegman, 4913 E.
Sunnyslope Road; Jodi Anderly, 5425 Wooddale Avenue; Myrtle Grette, 5709 -York
Avenue; Art /Jackie Nelson, 6628 Brittany Road; Don /Barb Steinkamp, 4912 Payton
Court; and Margaret Mullin, 4417 Claremore Drive; Commercial - Marquette Bank.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by
Member Kelly to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED ON STORM DRAINAGE UTILITY: ORDINANCE TO BE DRAFTED.
Affidavits of notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file.
Engineer Fran Hoffman made the presentation advising that 18,000 notices were sent
to property owners in Edina regarding the public hearing on the storm drainage
utility. Staff has expended considerable time during 1987/88 reviewing the City's
storm sewer system, including pipes, ponds, stormwater detention areas and creeks.
Over the years the City has constructed new facilities through the development
process and special assessment to project areas. The maintenance needs of the
system have increased over the years and the two major rainstorms of 1977 and 1987
suggest a policy review to create an additional movement of floodwaters from
private to public areas. Currently, there are four major categories in the Public
Works budget: 1) Engineering, 2) Streets (sub- categories: ramps & parking lots,
street maintenance and storm.sewer, lakes & ponds), 3) Equipment Operation, and 4)
Utilities. It is proposed that the sub - category of storm sewer, lakes & ponds
under Streets be transferred under Utilities, similar to the water system and
sanitary sewer system which is allowable under State Statute 444.075. The goals
of establishing a storm drainage utility would be: 1) to maintain existing storm
water facilities so they will operate properly for a longer period of time, 2)
provide and improve wetlands to clean storm water and retard flows, and 3) to
replace existing storm facilities which could become unusable over the years due
to natural deterioration. Obviously, to achieve these goals will cost more than
the City is currently expending today on routine maintenance of the system.
Construction of any new storm sewer systems will continue to be paid for by the
developer (i.e. Hedberg and Carl Hanson properties). The Storm Drainage Utility
would be a service similar to the water and sanitary sewer utilities. Fees would
be based on the amount of water discharged into the storm sewer system. For
example, a parking lot creates more runoff than a grass area of the same size, so
commercial, industrial and multiple dwelling properties would accrue higher rates
than residential properties. Staff looked at the various lot sizes to determine a
basic unit for single.family properties. It was determined that 16,000- 17,000
square feet was the average for single family lots and was the basis used in
developing the proposed quarterly fees for various properties as follows:
Single Family Homes and Duplexes $5.00 /lot
Parks, Cemeteries and Golf Courses $3.36 /acre
Schools $15.90 /acre
Churches, Institutional and Multiple
Family Dwellings $40.35 /acre
Commercial and Industrial $67.25 /acre
The rate structure was developed around a two-inch rainfall with different types
of property having typical percent of impervious surface resulting in a certain
amount of runoff. From this information, runoff factors were developed for types
of property. The single family rate and runoff were then used as'a standard
equivalency factor for development of other rates. The proposed rate table does
not reflect any credits on individual properties or reflect any credits for
properties still paying special assessments. Staff believes credit be considered
for individual properties with large ponds for holding storm water and for those
currently paying for previously levied special assessments. It is proposed that
properties still paying special assessments not begin paying the utility fee until
the special assessment period has expired. Costs for the proposed utility plan
were presented as follows:
PROPOSED UTILITY PLAN
Routine Maintenance (General Fund Transfer) $100,000.00
Replacement /Engineering (Includes Equipment Costs) 200,000.00
Policy Updates (Private to Public Areas) 300.000.00
$600,000.00
Engineer Hoffman stated that Public Works does not propose any projects that would
cure last year's rainstorms. However, following that unfortunate experience staff
has looked at the areas where storm water stood and also looked at swales, ponding
areas and public parks that currently allows water storage but that could be
upgraded to lower the potential for flooding in private areas. The results of
establishing a Storm Drainage Utility will_be: a) Increased protection for people
and property, b) Reduced insurance risks, and-c) Improved property values
community -wide. A graphic showing a comparison of the proposed Edina rate
structure with the cities of Roseville, Richfield and Apple Valley was presented.
Following discussion.and questions by the Council, public comment was heard as
follows. Speaking in support of the Storm Drainage Utility were: Don Elwell, 5717
Grove Street; Francis Link, 6415 York Avenue, who presented a petition signed by
74 residents; George Pratt, 6216 South Knoll Drive; Gary Thatcher, 6901 Southdale
Road, who asked how projects would be prioritized; Steve Mundy, 5500 Grove Street;
Nora Davis, 6921 Southdale Road. Speaking against the proposal were: Leroy
Swanson, 6321 Ashcroft Lane; Delois Fechner, 4116 France Avenue; Mark Dahlquist,
5012 Schaefer Road; Walt Sandison, 4612 W. 58th Street, who said schools should be
exempt. The following said the cost should remain as an assessment so as to be
tax deductible: Chris Glen, 5311 Hollywood Road, who also questioned credits for
individual properties; David McDonald, 6929 Southdale Road. The following persons
questioned the fee structure: Tim Keen, 3616 W. Fuller Street; Trygve Holl, 5509
Highwood Drive; Glen Carlson, 5908 Code Avenue; Don Cain, 3505 W. 55th Street;
Doug Jordahl, 5109 Green Farms Road, representing Colonial Church, who also asked
how credit for ponds would be calculated; Bob Shaw, representing Colony Park
Baptist Church, who said churches should be in same category as schools; and
Malcolm Kindy, representing Creek Valley Baptist Church, who said they were for
the proposed utility but questioned why church would pay more than schools.
Robert Sykes, 4524 Casco Avenue, stated he was generally for the utility but felt
the City should do more to encourage storm water management policy related to land
development. For the record, letters in response to the notice of public hearing
were received from: Joseph W. Burke, 5113 West 58th Street; Donald G. McMillan,
President of White Oaks Improvement Association; Mary A. Matthews, 5402 Xerxes
RArenue So.; Robert Fletcher, 4301 W. 42nd Street; David Olson, 7175 Cahill Road;
Donald /Bernice Peterson, 6015 Idylwood Drive; Robert /Mary Wenborg, 5801 Creek
Valley Road; Richard Maxwell, 5104 W. 58th Street; a letter undated signed Edina
Residents; John W. Hedberg, 3725 W. 76th Street; Richard A. Glasgow, 7742 Lochmere
Terrace and Richard A. Lind, 5725 View Lane; letters are on file in Engineering
Department. No further comment being heard, Member Turner made a motion to
approve the storm drainage utility concept as presented and to authorize
development of an ordinance for a storm drainage utility with a start date of
January 1, 1989. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Member Richards commented
that he would support the motion but the Council should be furnished with
additional information on two issues: 1) fee structure for schools vs. churches,
and 2) tax benefits for citizens.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
Following brief discussion, it was agreed that the draft ordinance and the
additional information requested .would be brought back to the Council at its
meeting of September 19, 1988.
PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED ON TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM NO. P -88 -8 S.A.P.
120 - 166 -01 (HAZELTON ROAD AT BYERLY'S /LEISURE LANE DRIVEWAYS): REQUEST WITHDRAWN
BY BYERLY'S. Affidavits of notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on
file. Engineer Hoffman informed the Council that Byerly's has appeared before the
Edina Traffic Safety Committee requesting consideration on installation of a
driveway signal on Hazelton Road at the Byerly's /Leisure Lane western entrances.
The firm of Barton /Aschman has completed a traffic study which indicated that a
traffic signal would be appropriate and warranted. Byerly's is a high traffic
generator and due to the large volume of traffic entering and exiting Byerly's in
the one primary driveway, a safety and congestion concern has been raised. To
help eliminate this problem Byerly's has attempted various solutions. In early
1986, Byerly's submitted a request for no right turn on red signing,at France
Avenue and Hazelton Road to try to improve the ease of access and exiting Byerly's
parking lot. Dual outbound lanes were also provided. A request was also
submitted to Hennepin County to allow a right -turn in only movement to Byerly's
lot off northbound France Avenue, near.72nd Street. That request was denied by
the county. They have also considered and followed up on a. proposal to reduce
existing problems by proposing an access connection to the Dayton's store parking
.lot near the southwest corner of Byerly's parking lot. The change has not been
implemented because of cost and its limited ability to correct the continuing
problem. Engineer Hoffman advised that Hazelton Road is a state aid eligible
..: street and fifty percent of the signal cost would be eligible subject to state aid
approval of the signal warrants study. The other fifty percent of the cost would
have to be assessed to abutting property owners. The staff recommendation would
be to distribute assessment cost based on traffic generated at the driveways.
Past history on traffic signal funding has been as follows: A) Signals on county
roads and municipal state aid streets have been funded from City state aid funds
with the following exceptions: 1) West 70th Street /Cornelia Drive was 50% state
aid and 50% assessed; 2) Driveway signals at Southdale Office Center and Southdale
Shopping Center on France Avenue were 100% assessed based on driveway volumes.
Engineer Hoffman said that Leisure Lane tenants have called and indicated they do
not want to participate in the assessment. Member Kelly asked if the City were to
participate with 50% state aid would there be another place that the City could
have used these funds. Engineer Hoffman said the fund is fairly large so that
this would not sway doing another project elsewhere. Member Turner asked about
the location, the appropriateness of this as the solution to the problem and
whether there would be a problem of car stacking at the intersection. Charles
Rickert, Barton /Aschman, said they were hired by Byerly's to look at the traffic
situation and the possibility of a traffic signal. As to stacking, when they -
looked at a design for the signal they also looked at a capacity analysis and came
up with approximately 150 feet in each of two lanes and concluded there would be
adequate stacking distance. If needed, there could be some inter - connect with the
signal on France Avenue to continue the movement on Hazelton Road. Member Smith
commented that the subject entrance /exit to Byerly's is bad but said he felt there
are other solutions to the problem. Verle Poffenberger, of Byerly's, stated that
over the years they have tried to do something with the entrance and have added an
extra right turn lane in. They have also talked with Hennepin County about
getting a right turn only off of northbound France Avenue to relieve the
congestion. He said they do not know of any other solution. They have talked
with Dayton's Home Store about coming through their parking but that really is not
an answer. They feel the answer is the traffic signal which could be programmed
according to the traffic volume and that Byerly's would be willing to pay 70% of
the 50% cost to be assessed which corresponds to the traffic generated by them.
Member Smith commented that he would like to see further study done on what could
be accomplished with the site with regard to the problem that is not in the nature
of a signal. Member Richards indicated that he would not support public
participation in the traffic signal and that if they wanted to pursue the signal
it should be assessed 100% to benefitted properties. In response, and based on
the comments of the Council, Mr. Poffenberger stated that Byerly's would withdraw
the proposal for installation of the traffic signal. He said that, based on the
study done by Barton /Aschman, they felt this was the only solution to the problem
but that they could not stand 100% of the expense. Albert Kempf, 7101 France
Avenue South /Leisure Lane, said he objected to the proposed signal because no one
has looked at the situation at Leisure Lane. They are a small place and have no
room for stacking lanes at busy times and with a signal it would be even more
difficult. No formal action was taken.
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR OAK PONDS OF INTERLACHEN 2ND ADDITION. Affidavits
of notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Craig
Larsen presented the request for preliminary plat approval for Oak Ponds of
Interlachen 2nd Addition, generally located west of Blake Road and Fox Meadow Lane
extended. The subject property comprises two large lots which front on Schaefer
Road; each lot is about 2.5 acres in size and there is a developed single family
home on each of the lots. The proposal has been before the Community Development
and Planning Commission on two different occasions. At the latest meeting on July
27, 1988, the Commission recommended preliminary plat approval for creation of
three new single family lots (Lots 2, 3 and 4) from the rear portions of the
Schaefer Road houses. The lots range in size from one -half to three - quarters acre
and are approximately 100 feet wide at the building line. The proposed lots are
generally larger and wider than the lots in either Oak Ponds of Interlachen 1st
Addition or the lots in Taft Addition off Scriver Road. Planning Commission
discussion centered upon Lot 4, its shape and ultimate placement of a house on
that lot. The revised plat under consideration allows a wider lot area and would
allow the house to be elevated at or above the elevation of 942' that has been
recommended by the engineers for the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. The
Commission recommended that the new house on Lot 4 should have a front street
setback similar to the existing homes on Fox Meadow Lane. The house immediately
east of Lot 4, (Bob Ulrich, 6221 Fox Meadow Lane) is set back 36 feet. This would
be the minimum requirement for the new house on Lot 4. The developer has
suggested a setback of between 50 and 60 feet for the house. Planner Larsen said
he would suggest a front street setback for Lot .4 of between 36 feet and 50 feet.
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the preliminary plat, subject to:
1) final plat approval, 2) subdivision dedication, 3) developer's agreement and 4)
Nine Mile Creek Watershed approval and the further recommendation that the house
placement on Lot 4 should be the average front yard setback of the houses along
Fox Meadow Lane. He noted that Michael Halley, Michael Halley Homes, Inc., was
present to answer.questions. Member Richards asked that the issue of the front
yard setback for Lot 4 be resolved with Mr. Ulrich, owner of the property directly
east of Lot 4. Bob Ulrich, 6221 Fox Meadow Lane, pointed out that there is an
existing cul -de -sac in front of his property which the developer has.agreed to
remove,, and when the street is straightened out his house will be further from the
street. He said he preferred that the setback for the house on Lot 4 be .
approximately 50 feet. Planner Larsen clarified that with regard to the front
setback Mr. Halley was referring to the street line and that he was referring to
the property line which is somewhat set back from the street. Member Richards
asked that when this is brought back for final plat approval that Council be
advised of the footprint of the proposed house. John Kyllo, 5201 Schaefer Road,
said he was concerned about storm water drainage from the proposed development and
also where the road would go for future further development in the area. He said
that some time ago there was a real concern about getting in and out of the area
when the property to the east was developed. Also, there had been a general
overall development plan for the entire area which he felt was not being followed
now. Planner Larsen explained that the proposed development does allow for future
development to the north by continuing the dedicated right of way to the northerly
property line. This has been a requirement placed on other developments in the
area. A cul -de -sac would provide adequate turnaround for emergency vehicles.
Further-, the developer has been asked to provide a storm water plan for the
proposed development and the engineers from Nine Mile Creek Watershed District
have reviewed the plan and have determined that the area can adequately handle the
storm water drainage. Their concern was the relative elevation of the house on
Lot 4. He said that there is an existing small pond southwest of Lots 3 and 4 and
there is also a pond on the lot immediately north of the subject property. During
last year's July storm, these pond areas flooded a large area and had to be pumped
down since they have no outlet. Planner Larsen said the City would ultimately be
asking for easements to provide outlets for those ponds as further development
occurs in the area. The developer's responsibility is to make sure that the
impact is not negative on adjacent properties and also that the homes that are
built on the new development will not suffer because of storm water drainage.
Michael Halley, developer, stated that a storm water management study was
delivered to the Planning Commission and that the City Engineer has approved it.
Member Smith commented that he was not sure.how much subdivision of these large
lots should occur. In response to Mr. Kyllo's concern, Member Richards recalled
that there was a plan for development of the area that would allow for the roadway
to continue northerly up to Scriver Road and that he assumed that the Planning
Commission's recommendation for approval of the proposed subject development
adhered to that general plan. Planner Larsen clarified that when talking with any
one who is interested in development of the area staff has talked about those
overall development options of some years ago and have asked that they demonstrate
that they will not cut off those options for development in the future. He said
Mr. Halley has shown staff a plan that would allow connecting the road through to
Scriver Road which would be one of those options. Member Kelly said she would
like to see more detail on how the roadway would be handled. In response,
Mr. Halley said that his understanding was, when he developed Oak Ponds of
Interlachen, that Fox Meadow Road would eventually head north and tie in with
Scriver Road. Topographically that would work and seems to be consistent with a
number of plat drawings in that area. Each one of the property owners who may
wish to develop their property have to make a conscious decision to allow the
roadway.to continue. He said his understanding of staff's concern is to allow
flexibility that the road can continue if the next adjacent property owner wishes
to see that happen. He explained that the area is densely wooded and is prime in
the sense that it is all high.ground and that the proposed houses will be
consistently slightly higher than adjacent homes. Also, his goal is to retain as
many trees as possible. Mr. Kyllo reiterated his concern for water drainage: and
the flooding of the ponds in the area. Member Richards said that although a
number of legitimate questions have been raised, he was prepared to move .
preliminary plat approval. However, prior to final plat approval Mr. Halley
should 1) indicate where the footprint of the house on Lot 4 would be sited, 2)
how the existing cul -de -sac would be straightened out and how the roadway would be
handled for the proposed development, and 3) that staff make available to anyone
interested the storm water drainage plan submitted by Mr. Halley and also
determine whether or not a pond would be required on Lots 4 and 5. Member
Richards then introduced.the following resolution and moved adoption, subject to
1) final plat approval, 2) subdivision dedication, 3) developer's agreement and 4)
Nine Mile Creek Watershed District approval,. 5) siting of the house on Lot 4, 6)
detailed plan for the straightening` of the existing cul -de- sac and roadway to the
proposed development, and 7) that the storm water drainage plan be available to
the public and that a determination be made as to a storm water retention pond for
Lots 4 and 5:
_Pr .
BE IT RESOLVED by the
certain plat entitle
Halley Homes, Inc. a
August 15, 1988 be a
Motion for adoption o
Rollcall:
RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT
FOR OAK PONDS OF NTERI CHEN 2ND ADDITION
City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota; that that
d "OAK'PONDS OF INTERIACHEN 2ND ADDITION, platted by Michael
an presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of
an is hereby granted preliminary plat approval.
f the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Smith
Resolution adopted.
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR HED ADDITION. Affidavits of notice were presented,
approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen presented the request for
preliminary plat approval for the Hed Addition, located at 6625 West Trail, Lot 1,
Block 10, Indian Hills. The subject property is a developed single family lot
with an area of 79,207 square feet. The proponent has submitted a preliminary
plat which would create one new buildable lot. The existing house would remain as
it is today. The new lot would contain 34,277 square feet, and the lot for the
existing house would contain 44,930 square feet. The new house is proposed to
front on Iroquois Trail. Both lots comply or exceed all Zoning Ordinance
requirements for single family lots. A graphic of the proposed plat was shown
indicating the existing house and driveway and proposed house to be constructed on
the new lot. In support of their application, the proponents have submitted an
analysis and survey of 40 lots in the western portion of Indians to determine lot
size. The existing lot (Lot 1, Block 10, Indian Hills) is the largest in the area
and following the subdivision the resulting lots would remain among the largest
lots in this area of Indian Hills. Planner Larsen explained that, normally, staff
would want to see the property split more evenly than is proposed. However, in
this case a more even division of the property would require removing the existing
house. The present proposal maximizes the size of Lot 2 while saving the existing
house. The entire property is heavily wooded and the existing house is barely
visible from the street. A division which would require removing the existing
house may disturb the site more than the present proposal. He advised that at its
meeting of July 27, 1988, the Community Development and Planning Commission
reviewed the proposal and recommended preliminary approval subject to: 1) final
plat approval, 2) subdivision dedication, and 3) utility connection charges. He
stated that Virgil Hed, proponent, was present to answer questions. Member Smith
asked questions about the retaining wall adjacent to Iroquois Trail. Planner
Larsen said that it was an existing private retaining wall on the property.
Member Smith commented that the lots in the proposed plat are consistent in size
with the neighborhood with the exception of the large lots to the east. No other
comment being heard, Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved
adoption, subject to: 1) final plat approval, 2) subdivision dedication, and 3)
utility connection changes:
RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT
FOR HED ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "HED ADDITION ", platted by Virgil and Sharon Hed, husband .
and wife, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of August 15,
1988 be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR EDINA COMMUNITY LUTHERAN CHURCH EXPANSION APPROVED.,
Affidavits of notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner
Larsen presented the request of Edina Community Lutheran Church, 4113 West 54th
Street, for a conditional use permit. Edina Community Lutheran Church, generally
located south of West 54th Street-and west of Halifax Avenue, has applied for a
conditional use permit to build a new sanctuary and convert the existing sanctuary
into a fellowship hall. The new sanctuary will seat 210 people which is an
increase of 23 seats over the present sanctuary. The project includes remodeling
the interior of the existing building. The exterior of the new sanctuary will be
finished with cedar shakes and stone trim to match the stone on the existing
church. The existing building will be re -sided with cedar shakes to match the new
addition. Discussion at the Community Development and Planning Commission meeting
centered upon where additional parking would be located on the church site. The
church property measures 4.73 acres in size. However, much of the area is within
the flood plain of Minnehaha Creek. No building or other obstructions may be
placed in the flood plain. Consequently, the only buildable area is the
northeasterly portion of the site.i All of the proposed construction is above the
flood plain elevation. Under certain circumstances, parking could be developed
within the flood plain area. However, from staff's point of view it is not a
desirable alternative. In looking at other alternatives, it was determined to
develop as much - parking as possible on the upper area of the church ground and if
parking overflowed the capacity of that lot it could locate on West 54th Street
where there is adequate street width for parking on'both sides and very _few homes.
The church's proposal calls for rebuilding the existing parking area to the south
and west of the church to accommodate 41 cars. The existing parking area is
unstriped and accommodates 25 -35 cars. With seating for 210 persons, the Zoning
Ordinance requires 70 parking spaces. In order to provide the required parking
the church would need to locate the additional parking within the flood plain
area. The church has elected to request a parking variance of 29 spaces to avoid
disturbing the natural conditions existing adjacent to the creek According to
church officials the intent of the addition and renovation project is to better
accommodate existing needs and not to prepare for any significant increase in
congregation size. The seating capacity increase is very modest and the existing
building would benefit from.the proposed renovation. The building design and the
soft, natural materials seem appropriate for the site. The Planning Commission
members discussed at length.whether to recommend the parking variance and the
conditional use permit or to require a proof of parking agreement. The question
arose if there is a proof of parking agreement in place and additional parking is
required in the future, where would those 29 spaces be located. The answer would
be in the flood plain which both the church and staff have been trying to avoid.
At its meeting of July 27, 1988, the Planning Commission recommended approval of
the conditional use permit, with a 29 space parking variance as recommended by
staff, and that the City and church enter into a proof of parking agreement.
Planner Larsen stated that the Planning Commission, staff, the church, and
neighbors all supported the proposed parking variance to avoid disturbing the
flood plain areas on the church property. He explained that staff did not
recommend the proof of parking agreement for these reasons: 1) The increase in
seating capacity is small, only 23 seats. 2) The flood plain area is the only
place to develop more parking. This area is approximately 16 feet lower than the
existing parking lot make it undesirable parking. 3) Cars can park on both sides
of West 54th Street without disrupting traffic flow. 4) Present church activities
have not caused problems for the neighborhood. Planner Larsen said that
representatives of the church were present, as well as John Cunningham, project
architect. Member Turner asked if all alternatives for parking have been
considered. Planner Larsen said there may be room for additional parking in the
future if the existing parsonage were removed. Staff also looked at the
possibility of a parking bay adjacent to West 54th Street. However, the level of
traffic and the existing width of the`street did not seem to warrant that
alternative. Staff also looked at public park land on the south side of West 54th
Street and west of Minnehaha Creek as off -site parking; however, that is rather
remote to the church. Member Smith asked how a proof of parking agreement would
be handled. Planner Larsen said the standard procedure with regard to a proof of
parking agreement is that the City would hope it would not need to be enforced.
The problem with an agreement is if additional parking is proved to be needed the
City would require that parking be provided somehow on the site. Here the only
place would be down on the flood plain. Planner Larsen added that.the City and
church could enter into a general agreement, similar to that with Colonial Church,
whereby the church would work with the City to solve parking problems should they
occur in the future. Ann Bishop, 5324 Halifax Avenue, asked about the impact of
traffic in the neighborhood if both sanctuaries are used to capacity. Planner
Larsen explained that the Zoning Ordinance says you calculate the demand on
traffic and parking based on the largest use assembly which in this case would be
so modest that there would be no noticeable increase in traffic. If in the .
future, both structures were used concurrently, it could have some impact. When
the City reviews requests for conditional use permits from schools and churches,
staff relies on those institutions telling staff how they operate. Mark Brethein,
5429 Woodcrest Drive, said he was supportive of the church's plan and in favor of
the parking variance. He said he was concerned about any option to build parking
in the flood plain as that would be across the creek from his property.
Member Smith commented that he would like to see some kind of agreement with the
church regarding future parking needs. Member Turner said she would not support
putting parking in the flood plain. She added that the Council has been tough
with churches in recent years regarding their parking requirements; that we should
not make an exception here and that there should be some type of agreement.
Member Richards made a motion.that approval of the Conditional Use Permit for
Edina Community Lutheran Church be continued to September 19, 1988 and that staff
be directed to bring back an agreement regarding future parking needs for approval
before the Conditional Use Permit is granted. Motion was seconded by Member
Smith.
Ayes:. Kelly, Richards,. Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF AUGUST 9. 1988 APPROVED. Because of the
number of persons present regarding Agenda Item VIII.A (Approval of Traffic Safety
Committee Minutes), Mayor Courtney declared this the next item to be heard.
Engineer Hoffman reviewed the discussion held at the Traffic Safety Committee
meeting of August 9, 1988 regarding the traffic issues on Halifax Avenue, West
51st through West 54th Streets and the temporary traffic barricade that had been
installed ,at Halifax and West 51st Street. He recalled that at the July meeting
the Committee had.recommended that the Council conduct a public hearing on this
matter to get input from the residents of Halifax Avenue and the affected
surrounding neighborhoods. At its meeting of August 9, 1988, the members
considered whether other testing should be done between now and the public
hearing. He explained that the Committee looks at three aspects when considering
traffic issues: 1) engineering, 2) enforcement, and 3) education. A motion was
made to leave the barricade in place which motion was defeated. A second motion
to recommend the barricade remain and that the Committee cannot determine
neighborhood issues or which roadways might be considered neighborhood roadways or
neighborhood collector roadways which motion was also defeated. The motion that
was passed was to remove the barricade and place large "LOCAL TRAFFIC ONLY" signs
on Halifax Avenue, that new traffic counts and statistics be compiled and
re- education be assessed before the public hearing on September 19, 1988. In
summary, he said the Committee was divided on this issue. Member Smith said that
he had observed the area of the barricade, that several cars had driven around it
and had entered Halifax and that he questioned the "re- education" of the drivers
not to use Halifax. Secondly, he said the barricade does affect the residents of
The Lanterns and that they should be contacted. Engineer Hoffman said that
residents of The Lanterns have been attending the meetings. Member Turner asked
about other alternatives alluded to by Chief Swanson. Chief Swanson said that
when this was originally discussed in April there were a number of alternatives
suggested including diverters at West 52nd Street, or a barricade at West 54th
Street. Of those, only the temporary barricade at West 51st Street was tested
with a very predictable result - tremendous reduction of southbound Halifax
traffic. The sense of the motion passed by the Committee was to remove the
barricade and see what the counts then are. He said he felt the data that could
be collected by September 19th would not be adequate because of the short
interval. Member Smith said he was in favor of the barricade being made permanent
in order to preserve the Halifax Avenue neighborhood. Speaking in support of the
barricade remaining and keeping Halifax Avenue as a residential street were John
Crist, 5324 Halifax Avenue, who said he was speaking for 22 other people present,
and DeVere Brekke, 5221 Halifax Avenue. For the record letters in support of the
barricade were received from: Bennett /Mary Jo Porter, 5120 Halifax; Teresa
Forliti, 5335 Halifax; Kathy O'Deo, 5325 Halifax; Donna /Jerome Bahn, 5241 Halifax;
Lynda Carlson, 5105 Halifax; Ralph /Cloise Oir, 5220 Halifax; DeVere Brekke, 5221
Halifax; Marilyn /Harland Halvorson, 5217 Halifax; Mary /David Thatcher; Karen /Ted
Allen, 5216 Halifax; Karen Wylie, 1111 W. 107th Street, Bloomington; Pamela Lien,
4400 W. 58th Street; Sybil Adelson, 146 Marguerite Av., Santa Monica, CA; Mary
Karinen, 5032 Halifax; Gail Bolger; Joyce Leach, 4550 Laurel Av., Grants Pass, OR;
Daniel /Lori Smiley, 5308 Halifax; Pam Aagaard, 5313 Halifax; Suzie Kuntz, 5125
Halifax; Don Bublitz, 5236 Halifax. Letters in opposition were received from:
Thomas M. LeGeros, 5128 Indianola; Marge Kosmos, 5121 Juanita; Frank Bennett, 5436
Brookview Avenue; Nancy Joas, 5129 Indianola. Following more Council discussion,
Member Turner moved approval of the following recommended action listed in Section
A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of August 9 1988:
1) That the barricade be removed and large "LOCAL TRAFFIC ONLY" signs be placed on
Halifax Avenue at West 51st Street, that new traffic counts and statistics be
compiled and re- education assessed before the City Council's public hearing
regarding this issue;
2) Installation of "NO PARKING OR STOPPING" signs along the 5100 block of Vest
50th Street;
3) That a center line be painted in the curve area of Timber Ridge Road and also
that "CURVE" signs be posted;
and to acknowledge Sections B and C of the Minutes.
Motion was seconded by Member Kelly.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Smith
Motion carried.
Member Kelly stated that there is a perceived conflict of interest regarding the
next Agenda Item V.C. Final Development Plan - Southdale Center Expansion, and
excused herself from the meeting.
FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVED FOR SOUTHDALE CENTER EXPANSION: SUBJECT TO
CONDITIONS. Affidavits of notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on
file. Planner Larsen presented the request for Final Development Plan approval
for Southdale Center. He advised that The Center Companies, representing
Southdale Center have submitted plans for an expansion and renovation of the
Center. Since the expansion is greater than 10% of the existing floor area,
Final Development Plan approval is required. A detailed description of the
proposed project has been provided by the Center Companies. Graphics were
presented illustrating the proposed expansion. The project would include the
construction of a new Dayton's department store containing approximately 340,000
square feet of gross floor area. The store would be constructed immediately
northwest of the present store. The existing Dayton's store would be converted to
mall space and new tenant space. This conversion would provide approximately
117,000 square feet of new leasable area in the Center. In addition, all existing
common areas and mall areas would be renovated. Three new single level parking
decks would be added to serve the expanded Center. The J.C. Penney and Dayton's
Garden Centers would be removed. The Southdale Center site contains 3,541,820
square feet or approximately 81 acres. The expanded Center would contain
1,353,263 square feet resulting in a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.38. The PC -3
Commercial District allows a FAR of 0.5. The net addition to the .Center is
191,694 square feet of gross floor area. Southdale currently provides 6,527
parking spaces. The construction of the new Dayton's store would result in the
loss of 437 spaces. The project proposed three new single level parking decks
containing a total of 882 spaces. Total parking on site would be increased to
6,974 spaces at completion. Shopping centers are required to provide 5 spaces for
each 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. Southdale would be providing 5.15
spaces per 1,000 square feet. The existing one -way circulation system at the
perimeter of the site would be continued with some modifications to improve flow.
The .proposed expansion will require the relocation of the bus - transit . activities
from the north to the south side of the Center. The Center Companies has been
working with MTC staff to assure a smooth transition.of service. Also, the Center
Companies has agreed in principle to allow the Southeast Edina Transit System to
circulate through the Center and easements will be obtained to ensure this.
Planner Larsen pointed out that three of the four perimeter streets around the
Center are not constructed to urban standards. Staff has suggested.that these
streets should be upgraded in connection with the Center's expansion. Two of
these streets, York and West 66th Streets are county roads, West 69th Street is a
City street. Barton - Aschman, traffic consultant for Southdale, has prepared a
plan illustrating upgraded streets and modified access to the Center. The plan as
presented may require additional rights of way. The proposed expansion would
include a substantial upgrading of the existing landscaping and would exceed that
required by the Zoning Ordinance. However, additional screening is needed for
some parking areas along the east and south property lines. The Center Companies
have also submitted, through their traffic consultant, Barton - Aschman, a traffic
impact.analysis of the proposed expansion. Engineer Fran Hoffman has reviewed the
report and concurs with its findings and conclusions. Planner Larsen concluded
that Southdale is now 32 years old and the proposed expansion is intended to
preserve Southdale's competitive position in a changing retail climate. Staff
feels it is important to the community for Southdale to remain strong and healthy.
The proposed renovation of the Center will insure that Southdale will continue to
be an asset to the community. Final Development Plan approval is recommended with
the following conditions: 1) Staff approval of a landscaping plan and schedule to
include additional screening of parking and drive aisles, 2) An access - egress plan
for West 66th Street, York Avenue and West 69th Street, including any additional
rights of way, acceptable to the City and to Hennepin County for West 66th Street
and York Avenue. Specifically, the plan for West 69th Street should be agreed to
jointly by The Center Companies and the owners of the adjacent property to the
south prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) An easement to allow vehicles of
the Southeast Edina Transit authority the right to pass through the Center
property. Planner Larsen stated that the plans now presented are the same plans
which were informally presented to the Council at a special meeting on July 18,
1988. He noted that Michael Kelly, President and Manager of Southdale Center, was
present to respond to questions. Michael Kelly said he had nothing to add to the
presentation made by Mr. Larsen. With regard to the upgrading of the surrounding
streets, he said they are willing to work with the owners of The Galleria
regarding West 69th Street but would not wish to have Southdale.'s project held up
while The Galleria is deciding what to do with their site. He said there is
enough flexibility on the access - egress plan for Southdale to match their's when
they decide what they want. Planner Larsen said the intent was to ensure that
some mutually acceptable plan is worked out. Don Brandt, representing Point of
France Association, Inc. said their objections to the plan centers around the
pedestrian and traffic problems that they are feeling more and more. The 144
families of Point of France find it impossible to cross France Avenue now and the
problems they see with additional traffic has been outlined in a letter dated
August 12, 1988 to the City. One facet of life at Point of France that will be
affected adversely by increased traffic is access to adult education. Because
Point of France is relegated to the Richfield School District, those residents who
wish to participate in adult educational activities must drive several miles in
heavy traffic to reach the Richfield facility; a condition that will be made worse
by expansion of Southdale. Mr. Brandt said that, although the Edina Council is
not involved in the school district boundaries, they would hope if the Southdale
improvement proceeds that they could reach an understanding with the Richfield
School District as a result of the increased tax base for the Richfield District
that Richfield would release Point of'France.from their school district. Also,
Point of France residents now must cross a six -lane highway (France Avenue) for
pedestrian access to public transportation or the Medical. Arts building across the
street. There are traffic lights at the corner of 66th /France but no sidewalk on
the opposite side. Furthermore, the lights change too rapidly for elderly people
to make the crossing safely. More traffic to an expanded Southdale will place
residents at greater risk. Gary Thatcher, 6901 Southdale Road, said he was
concerned about the traffic coming off the Crosstown Highway using Valley View
Road as a feeder into Southdale.either by using West 66th or West 69th Streets.
The property owners along Southdale Road never had a buffer between their
residential district and the commercial district. Now additional expansion of
Southdale will increase the traffic and they would like to see some type of
buffer. Mr. Thatcher said that in talking with Engineer Hoffman the traffic
counts will not be of such nature that it would warrant a sound or visual barrier.
He said that issue needs to be addressed. Mr. Kelly said that the traffic
r
analysis showed that the Valley View extension has additional capacity for traffic
which may be diverted into the Hedberg project as it is developed -as an
alternative way of moving traffic from the Crosstown Highway and dodging
Southdale. The Southdale expansion of less than 200,000 square feet will not "make
that much difference with respect to additional traffic on Valley View. Dave
Koski, Barton - Aschman, explained that some traffic would come from Valley View but
that the amount of traffic the Southdale expansion would add is less than 5% of
- the traffic that is on the streets now. He also said he doubted that any type of
barrier would be effective. Jim Jenewein, 6905 Southdale Road, and Rick Hauritz,
6613 Southdale Road, also spoke in.support of a visual barrier for the 22 homes
along Valley View Road to separate the residential area from the commercial.
Engineer Hoffman suggested that through redesign and reconstruction of Valley View
Road some berming could be done and that there will be a staff review of that
particular area for Council consideration shortly. Member Smith suggested that
some additional landscaping might alleviate the visual concerns. Further, that
the recent improvement of West 66th Street in Richfield be continued westerly to
address some of the pedestrian concerns. He also asked about the possibility of a
pedestrian overpass spaning France Avenue. He said he felt it important to retain
the visibility of Southdale and that he is in favor of what is proposed. Engineer
Hoffman said a pedestrian overpass is an old issue going back to 1980 when it was
proposed over France Avenue south of West 66th Street to service both the office
site and pedestrians. The question has always been would the facility really be
used. Member. - Turner asked about the timing of looking at the redesign of Valley
View Road. Engineer Hoffman said it would be within the next two months, but not
prior to final approval for the Southdale expansion. Member Turner observed that
the traffic study mentioned some York Avenue intersections that would have poor
capacity following full build -out of the area and suggested some mitigation
measures. She asked how those would be proposed to be funded. Engineer Hoffman
said he would expect that West 66th Street/York would be a county project with
partial assessment back to benefitted properties and some potential state aid
funding. West 69th/York would probably be partially assessed and part state aid
funds. As to improvements on West 69th Street, funding would be from state aid
funds and assessment. Member Turner said she thought those improvements are
important to.maintain good traffic movement around the site and that the second
condition to the approval was an important one. One issue brought up that may be
put into the access - egress plan or a separate condition is some kind of sidewalk
plan. Southdale itself is not pedestrian friendly and the intersection of West
66th and France is very difficult for pedestrians. She said she frequently sees
employees from the office building on the west side of France, using the
intersection in the middle of the parking lot to go to and from Southdale for
lunch. That is a dangerous situation because there is not a sidewalk to stand on
while waiting for the signal. She said this is an appropriate time to take a look
at ways to improve pedestrian access throughout. Mr. Kelly said there is not an
easy solution because the way Southdale and the surrounding - streets are laid out
they are not made for pedestrian crossings. Also, there is a relative low density
of pedestrians and therefore it is difficult to provide overpasses or underpasses
for the kind of density that exists around Southdale in comparison to downtown
Minneapolis for example. Anything that would be built would be under used and
would not justify the cost. If there is a real demand for movement through this
area, The Galleria, the Hedberg project, the hospital and Point of France should
connect with the proposed City transit system as a viable alternative. Member
Smith asked for a clarification regarding the access - egress plan for West 69th
Street being coordinated with the owners of The Galleria prior to issuance of a
building permit. Mr. Kelly indicated that if Southdale's timing proceeds faster
than that of The Galleria, Southdale did not want to be held up while they decide
what they want to do with their site. He said they have met several times but The
Galleria owners have not indicated how long it will take them to make a decision.
Member Richards commented that it is incumbent upon The Galleria owners, who have
received notice of the hearing to approve the plan for.West 69th Street, to speak
out on that issue or if the.staff does not feel the plan is responding to the
City's needs then the staff will need to state that. Manager Rosland said he felt
staff could sit down with The Center Companies staff and The Galleria owners
within the next 30 days and resolve this issue. If there was a problem that could
not be resolved, the matter could be brought back to the Council. There being no
further comment, Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved
adoption, subject to the following conditions: 1) Submission by the developer of
a landscaping and screening plan acceptable to City staff. 2) Approval by City
Council and by Hennepin County to the extent required, of an access - egress plan
for hest 66th Street, Vest 69th Street and York Avenue, including necessary rights
of way dedication and sidewalk development. The access - egress plan for Vest 69th
Street should be coordinated with the owners of The Galleria block if possible and
approved by City staff. 3) Execution and delivery of a recordable, permanent
easement to allow vehicles of the City's transit system the right to pass through
and collect /drop off passengers at designated locations in the Southdale Center
property and otherwise to be on terms and conditions acceptable to the City staff:
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR SOUTHDALE CENTER
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota,..that the Final
Development Plan for Southdale Center presented at the regular meeting of the City
Council of August 15, 1988 be and is hereby approved.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Further discussion was held regarding sidewalks and whether staff could determine
what the Council's direction was on the issue. Manager Rosland recommended Final
Development Plan Approval for Southdale Center and said that he felt within the
next 30 days staff could meet with representatives of Southdale Center and The
Galleria to discuss West 69th Street and the sidewalks so more defined information
could be brought back for the Council's review.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
(Member Kelly returned to the meeting at this point on the agenda.)
SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS HEARD REGARDING HALIFAX AVENUE TRAFFIC. Harland
Halvorson, 5217 Halifax Avenue, stated that he appreciated the diagonal diverter
that was placed at Halifax and West 51st Street to reduce the traffic and keep
Halifax and the adjacent streets as a residential area. He urged the Council to
take affirmative action to reduce the traffic on Halifax. An unidentified
gentleman who said he was a doctor stated that there. is a distinct safety issue
and a high volume of traffic problem on Halifax and that the solution of the
diverter was shown to be effective. He urged the Council to reconsider their
action of approving removal of the barricade. Randy Hosler, 5133 Halifax Avenue,
said he could not understand why the Council was opposed to the barricade and
added that no one who was opposed to it has ever shown at the Traffic Safety
Committee meetings. He added that the traffic counts had clearly shown that the
barricade was effective in reducing the volume of traffic on Halifax. Mayor
Courtney reiterated that this issue would again be considered at a public hearing
on September 19, 1988.
*BID AWARDED FOR STREET SURFACING WITH CURB & GUTTER (IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -282) FOR
APACHE ROAD AND INDIAN WAY WEST IN INDIAN HILLS WEST ADDITION. Motion was made by
Member Smith and seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for street surfacing
with concrete curb and gutter on Apache Road and Indian Way West in Indian Hills
West Addition to recommended low bidder, Hardrives, Inc., at $27,365.38.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*AWARD OF BID FOR USED MOTOR GRADER CONTINUED TO 9/12/88. Motion was made by
Member Smith and seconded by Member Kelly to continue award of bid for a used
motor grader to the meeting of September 12, 1988.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
GENE DAVIS NOMINATED TO NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT BOARD. Manager Rosland
advised that the term of Dr. Eugene Davis on the Nine Mile Creek Watershed
District Board will expire as of September 29, 1988 and staff would recommend that
his named be submitted to the Board of County Commissioners for re- appointment.
Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved adoption:
RESOLUTION
UHERAAS, the term of Dr. Eugene Davis on the Nine Mile .Creek Watershed District
Board will end on September 29, 1988;
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that it hereby
recommends and nominates Dr. Eugene Davis to the Hennepin County Board of
Commissioners for re- appointment to the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Board
and urges the Commissioners to approve the re- appointment.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Abstained: Richards
Resolution adopted.
1988 NLC CONGRESS OF CITIES NOTED. Manager Rosland directed the Council's
attention to a recent mailing regarding the 1988 NLC Congress of Cities to be held
December 3 -7 at Boston, MA. He suggested the Council give this consideration and
said it would be back on the Council Agenda in September for further discussion.
*PUBLIC HEARING DATE SET FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. Motion was made by Member Smith
and seconded by Member Kelly for adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARINGS FOR
MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. M -88
TREE REMOVAL 114PROVEMENT NO. TR -88
AQUATIC WEEDS IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ -88
STREET IMPROVEMENT NOS. BA -272, BA -273, BA -275, BA -276
ALLEY IMPROVEMENT NO., A -178
STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NOS: L -29, L -30, L -31
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows:
1. The Clerk and Engineer having calculated the proper amounts to be assessed for
the improvements set forth in the Notice of Hearing forms hereinafter recorded,
and the amounts proposed to be assessed against the respective lots, places and
parcels of land within the districts affected by said improvements, and said
proposed assessments having been filed with the Clerk, the same are hereby .
approved.and the Clerk shall keep the same on file in her office and open to
public inspection pending hearings thereon as herein provided.
2. This.Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the Notice of
Hearing form hereinafter contained, to pass upon said proposed assessments and the
Clerk's action in publishing notices of said hearings in the official newspaper in
accordance with law is hereby approved. Notices being as follows:
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR:
MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. M -88
TREE REMOVAL IMPROVEMENT NO. TR -88
AQIIATIC WEEDS IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ -88
STREET IMPROVEMENT NOS.. BA -272, BA -273, BA -275, BA -276
Notice is hereby given that the Edina City Council will meet at the City Hall at
4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota on September 19, 1988, at 7:00 P.M. to
hear, consider and pass upon all objections, both oral and written, to proposed
special assessments for the following improvements:
1. MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. M -88
50th Street and France Avenue Business District
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: All
parcels contained within the 50th Street and France Avenue Business District.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $42,157.67
2. TREE- REMOVAL ASSESSMENT NO. TR -89
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Lot 10,
except highway; AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 176; Lot 6, BRUM'S SUBDIVISION; That
part of Lot 1 lying West of East 120 feet thereof except street, Block 4, CODES
HIGHVIEW PARR ADDITION;. Lot 5, Block 1, DUBLIN HILL ADDITION; Lot 10, Block 22,
FAIRFAX ADDITION; That part of Lot 83 lying South of North 174 feet thereof
including adjacent 8 feet of Main Street vacated, MORNINGSIDE ADDITION; Easterly
50 feet of Lot 24 including adjacent 8 feet of Main Street vacated, RILEY'S
SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 3,4,5,6,7,30 and 31, GRIMES HOMESTEAD; West 100 feet of East
244 feet of South 150 feet and West 19 feet of South 50 feet of East 144 feet of
Lot 18, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARR 2ND ADDITION; Commending at a point in West
line of Section 07, Township 028, Range 24, thence North 60 feet, thence West 150
feet, thence South 60 feet, thence East 150 feet to beginning, Block 20, WAVELAND
PARR ADDITION..
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $2,413.50
3. AQIIATIC WEEDS IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ -88
Mill Pond and Indianhead Lake
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: All lots
reparian to Indianhead Lake and Mill Pond.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $14,757.00
4. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -272
Dearborn Court in Dearborn Addition and Blake Woods Addition
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Lots 1
through 4, Block 1, BLAKE WOODS ADDITION; Lots 3 through 8, Block 1, DEARBORN
ADDITION.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS:- $14,230.70
5. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -273
Antrim Terrace in Edina Oaks
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Lots 1
through 5, Block 1, EDINA OARS ADDITION.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $10,523.33
6. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -275
Green Farms Road and Apple Lane in Parkwood Knolls 22nd Addition
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Lots 1
through 3, Block 1; Lots 1 through 5, Block 2; Lots 1 through 8, Block 3, PARKWOOD
KNOLLS 22ND ADDITION.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS:- $30,992.53
7. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -276
Green Farms Road; Green Farms Court; Interlachen Court and Interlachen Road in
Interlachen Heights, and Interlachen_ Road from-Ridge Road Easterly 125 Feet plus
or minus.
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvements is as follows: Lots 1
through 5, Block 1; Lots 1 through 5, Block 2; Lots 1 through 11, Block 3;
INTERIACHEN HEIGHTS; Lot 1, Block 1, C.B. STROTZ FIRST ADDITION; Lot 4, Block 1,
SCHWANTES ADDITION.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS IS: $68,666.30
These proposed assessment rolls are not on file in the office of the City Clerk
and are open to public inspection.
APPEAL
Any owner may appeal the assessment to the District Court pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes 429.081, by serving notice.of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the
City of Edina within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment by the City
Council, and by filing such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days
after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. However, no appeal may be taken as to an
assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is
filed with the Clerk of the City of Edina prior to the hearing or- presented to the
presiding officer at the hearing.
DEFERRAL ON HOMESTEADS OWNED BY PERSONS 65 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER.
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, the City of Edina has adopted standards and
guidelines for deferring special assessments against homestead property owned by
persons 65 years of age or older for whom payment would be a hardship. To obtain
deferment, application must be filed with the City.Assessor's office by the close
of business on the last business day before the City Council meeting set out in
the first paragraph of this notice. For further information and application
forms, please call or visit the City Assessor's office.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL.
Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR:
ALLEY IMPROVEMENT NO. A -178
STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NOS. L -29, L -30, L -31
Notice is hereby given that the Edina City Council will meet at the City Hall at .
4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota on October 3, 1988, at 7:00 P.M. to hear,
consider and pass upon all objections, both oral and written, to proposed special
assessments for the following improvements:
1. ALLEY IMPROVEMENT NO. A -178
West 48th Street between 3913 West 48th Street and 4001 West 48th Street
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: West 65
feet of Lot 18 and Easterly 10 feet of Lot 19, WHITE OAKS FOURTH ADDITION; West 25
feet of Lot 19 and East 40 feet of Lot 20, WHITE OAKS FOURTH ADDITION.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $2,891.18
2. STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NO. L -29
York Avenue from West 74th Street to West 78th Street
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Outlot
A; Lot 1, Block 1, EBENEZER SOCIETY 1ST ADDITION; Lots 3 and 4, EDINBOROUGH
ADDITION; Phases 1,3 and 7, VILLAGE OF EDINBOROUGH CONDOMINIUM; Lot.l, Block 1, AL
JOHNSON ADDITION; Commencing at a point on East line of Lot 1 distance 177.36 feet
South from Northeast corner thereof, thence North 89 deg. 52 min. 23 sec., West
193.87 feet to East line of Al Johnson Addition, thence South to Southeast corner
of said Addition, thence West to Southwest corner thereof, thence Southerly and
Southeasterly along Westerly line of Lot 1, Block 1, Paul Klodt 1st Addition to
most Southerly corner of said Lot 1, thence North along East line thereof to
beginning, Block 1, PAUL KLODT FIRST ADDITION; Lot 1, Block 1, YORKDALE TOWNHOMES
OF EDINA.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $33,724.60
3. STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NO. L -30
West 76th Street from - Xerxes Avenue to Edinborough Way
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Lot 1,
Block 1, EBENEZER SOCIETY 1ST ADDITION; Phases 6 and 7, VILLAGE HOMES OF
EDINBOROUGH CONDOMINIUM; Lot 1, Block 1, AL JOHNSON ADDITION; That part of Lot 1
lying Northerly of the following described line: Commencing at the Northeast
E,(�rner of said Lot 1, thence South along the East line thereof a distance of
177.36 feet to a point of beginning of line to be described, thence North 89
degrees, 52 minutes, 23 seconds, West 193.87 feet to East line of Al Johnson
Addition and there terminating, Block 1, PAUL KLODT FIRST ADDITION; Lot 1, Block
1,. YORKDALE TOWNHOMES OF EDINA.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $11,984.15
4. STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NO. L -31
Edinborough Way from York Avenue to West 76th Street
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Lots 1
through 4, Block 1, EDINBOROUGH ADDITION; Phases 1 through 7, VILLAGE HOMES OF
EDINBOROUGH CONDOMINIUMS.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS IS: $51,917.86.
These proposed assessment rolls are now on file in the office of the City Clerk
and are open to public inspection.
APPEAL
Any owner may appeal the assessment to the District Court pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes 429.081, by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the
City of Edina within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment by the City
Council, and by filing such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days
after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. However, no appeal may be taken as to an
assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is
filed with the Clerk of the City of Edina prior to the hearing or presented to the
presiding officer at the hearing.
DEFERRAL ON HOMESTEADS OWNED BY PERSONS 65 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER.
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,.the City of Edina has adopted standards and
guidelines for deferring special assessments against homestead property owned by
persons 65 years of age or older for whom payment would be a hardship. To obtain
deferment, application must be filed with the City Assessor's office by the close
of business on the last business day before the City Council meeting set out in
the first paragraph of this notice. For further information and application
forms, please call or visit the City Assessor'.s office.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL.
Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*SEWER/WATER RATES CONTINUED TO 9/12/99. Motion was made.by Member Smith and
seconded by Member Kelly to continue the agenda item of sewer /water rates to the
Council Meeting of September 12, 1988.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*HEARING DATE OF 9/12/88 SET FOR VACATION OF WILLSON DRIVE (EDENMOOR). Motion was
made by- Member Smith and seconded by Member Kelly for adoption of the following
resolution:
RESOLUTION CALLING PIIBLIC HEARING ON
VACATION OF EASEMENT FOR STREET PURPOSES
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. It is hereby found and.determined that the following described easement for
street purposes should be considered for vacation, in accordance with the
provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 412.851 and 160.29:
That part of Edenmoor Street (dedicated as Willson Drive on the plat of
"EDENMOOR,.HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ") lying west of the southerly extension
of the east line of Lot 3, Block 3, "EDENMOOR, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ",
according to the recorded plat thereof.
2. This Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the form of notice
included in paragraph 3 hereof for the purpose of holding a public hearing on
whether such vacation shall be made in the interest of the public.
3. The Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and
purpose of said hearing to be published once a week for two weeks, in the Edina-
Sun, being the official newspaper of the City, the first publication at least 14
days prior to the date of such hearing and to post such notice, at least 14 days
prior to the date of such hearing, in at least three (3) public and conspicuous
places within the City, as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851. Such
notice shall be in substantially the following form:
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ON VACATION OF EASEMENT FOR STREET PURPOSES
IN THE CITY OF EDINA
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, will meet at the Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street on
September 12, 1988, at 7:00 p.m., for the purpose of holding a public hearing on
the proposed vacation of the following street right of way:
That part of Edenmoor Street (dedicated as Willson Drive on the plat of
"EDENMOOR, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ") lying west of the southerly extension
of the east line of Lot 3, Block 3, "EDENMOOR, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ",
according to the recorded plat thereof.
All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not
the above proposed street right of way vacation is in the public interest and
should be made shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider
the extent to which such proposed street right of way vacation affects existing
easements within the area of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the
vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning
or controlling electric, telephone, or cable television poles and lines, gas and
sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the
proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement
area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise
attend thereto, for the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution,
the.extent to which any or all of any such easements, and such authority to
maintain, and to enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL
Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
MEMBER TURNER WILL NOT SEEK RE- ELECTION. Member Turner announced that she will
not seek re- election to the Council. She said the last eight years have been a
good experience and that the Council, including past members, the Manager and City
staff are the best team in the state.
1989 BUDGET ASSUMPTIONS TO BE CONSIDERED IN SPECIAL MEETING ON 8/18/88. Because
of the late hour, it was informally agreed to meet on Thursday, August 18, 1988 at
8:00 a.m. to consider the 1989 Budget assumptions.
*CLAIMS PAID. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Kelly to
approve payment of the following claims as per pre -li'st dated 8/15/88: General
Fund $71,891.78, Art Center $1,240.62, Capital Fund $1,281.05, Swimming Pool Fund
$3,354.28, Golf Course Fund $9,811.01, Recreation Center Fund $27.20, Gun Range
Fund $377.22, Edinborough Park $5,485.93, Utility Fund $16,708.30, Liquor
Dispensary. Fund $929.24, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $491.75, Total $111,598.38; and
for payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 8/15/88: General Fund $136,224.12, Art
Center $8,125.71, Capital Fund $19,015.00; Swimming Pool Fund $1,545.80, Golf
Course Fund $10,779.97, Recreation Center Fund $111,699.18, Edinborough Park
$4,117.37, Utility $29,774.61, Liquor Dispensary Fund $93,752.80, Construction
Fund $31,202.83, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $1,800.00, Total $448,037.39; and for
confirmation of payment of Claims dated 7/31/88: General Fund $408.953.26, Art
Center $1,219.87, Swimming Pool Fund $5,363.16, Golf Course Fund $12,884.63,
Recreation Center Fund $4,538.87, Gun Range Fund $293.93, Edinborough Park
$10,373.98, Utility Fund $48,380.41, Liquor Dispensary Fund $144,021.,00, IMP Bond
Redemption #2 $315,125.00, Total $951,154.11.
Motion.carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
The meeting was adjourned at 11:25 p.m. by motion of Member Smith and seconded by
Member Kelly. Motion carried.
City Clerk
i
�91r1A,
cn
J , r �o
• ' ~�bRPORPRV19 •
iBBB ,
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
Kenneth Rosland
o Agenda Item #
II.
A. B. C.
From:
Craig Larsen
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Date:
September 12, 1988
Mgr . Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
z -87-3, S -87 -11
0
To Council
Final rezoning, final
plat and Final Site
Action
❑
Motion
Plan approval for
United Properties,
❑
Resolution
Hedberg Site.
❑
Ordinance
0
Discussion
Recommendation:
Approve Overall Development Plan, Final Plat and Final Site Plan for
Phase I.
Info /Background:
The Planning Commission recommended approval at its Aguust 24, 1988
Meeting.
Lu"CATION'.-MAP
REZONING....&
r7t�4,- W?,
1
NUMBER Z -87 -3 and S -87 -11
L O C A TI O N Generally located east of France and north of
Interstate 494
REQUEST R -1 Single Family to MD -6', Mixed Development District
Preliminary Plat ApprovLl
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MINUTES ON THE MEETING OF THE EDINA
COMMUNITY DEVELAi'MENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
HELD ON WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 24, 1988 AT 7:30 P.M.,,:
EDINA CITY HALT MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM ;
MEMBERS PRESENT: Acting Chair Gordon Johnson, Helen McClelland, Del Johnson,
Lee Johnson, Geof Qorkinger, John Palmer, Jane Paulus
and David Runyan
MEMBERS ABSENT: John Bailey, William Lewis, Virginia Shaw
STAFF PRESENT: Craig Larsen, City Planner
Fran Hoffman, City Engineer
Jackie Hoogenakker, Secretary
I. OLD BUSINESS
Z -87 -3 United Properties
& Hedberg Site
S -87 -11 R -1 Single Family to MD -6
Mixed Development District
South Edina Development Company
First Addition
Mr. Larsen presented his staff report noting changes to the proposal since
preliminary approval. Changes made are loss of the proposed health club, minor
changes to the park (i.e. relocation of the park building), reduction in square
footage in retail and office space and reduction in the number of housing units.
Mr. Larsen reported Phase I includes 276 housing units, 201,000 square feet of
retail space, 107,00 square feet of office space, and an eight screen theatre.
Peter Jarvis, Dennis Sutliff, BRW., Inc., Larry Laukka, Dick Anderson,
Laukka Development Company, Warren Beck, Gabbert and Beck, Lance Norderhus,
Eagle Enterprises and Mrs. and Mrs. John Hedberg were present.
Commissioner G. Johnson asked Mr. Jarvis if roadway completion of Minnesota
Drive would be completed during Phase I development. Mr. Jarvis responded the
majority of roadway improvements would be completed during or before the
development of Phase I. Mr. Hoffman added these improvements include the
completion of Minnesota Drive, rebuilding West 76th Street and France Avenue,
construction of Edinborough Way and Parklawn Avenue. Mr. Hoffman added Hennepin
County forecasts 1990 as completion of improvements along France Avenue.
Commissioner G. Johnson questioned Mr. Jarvis about the previously discussed
skyway option. Mr. Jarvis explained the skyway option has remained, but not as
part of Phase I. He added the skyway system has received mixed reviews and
remains a City policy decision. Mr. Jarvis pointed out the proposed transit
system may eliminate the need for a skyway system.
r .
4
Commissioner_.D..:Johnson questioned if the loss of the health club and
replacing it with retail would increase traffic. Mr. Jarvis said the final site
plans reduction in density from what was originally proposed has reduced traffic
between 18%-19 %. The elimination of the health -club and the addition of retail
should not create any additional traffic concerns. Mr. Jarvis -noted there is an
_.option that the -lower level of one of the proposed retail buildings may be
leased by a health club for aerobic classes, nautilus machines, weights etc.,
but not courts.
Commissioner Runyan asked Mr. Jarvis to explain the water feature of the
park. Mr. Jarvis said this aspect of the project was carefully and thoroughly
studied. It was found that ponding areas should be constructed with an 8 foot
depth sloping to 4 feet around the perimeter. This depth reduces the
possibility of the formation of algae. The ponds bottom and sides will be
composed of a synthetic material and covered with a 6 -8 inch layer of sand. Mr.
Jarvis noted that further study is required between them and the City if boats
will be allowed on the ponds. Continuing Mr. Jarvis said the DNR has indicated
they will approve the ponds being maintained by a well. This will insure a
constant water level. Mr. Jarvis also noted the possibility of using the ponds
as an irrigation system.
a
A discussion ensued regarding possible parking problems that may occur as a
result of high use of the park. Mr. Jarvis explained the 2 proposed pedestrian
bridges from the housing project to the park should eliminate the need for those
residents to use a vehicle to get to the park. Mr. Jarvis added he feels
parking for the park will be adequate.
Mr. Laukka presented to the Commission renderings of the proposed housing
development. Highlights of the proposed housing are as follows:
1) Six U shaped buildings totaling between 240 and 276 housing units.
40 -48 units per building.
2) Proposed square footage of the units range in size from 700 square
feet - 1,650 square feet.
3) Anticipated market price of the units are between $60,000 - $135,000.
It should be noted that the proposed units are slightly larger than
the units at Edinborough.
4) Option of an elevator. That option will be based on what the market
dictates.
5) The materials of the proposed housing will be brick (brick per
building may be 30 %) and vinyl siding.
6) Central air - conditioning as opposed to wall air conditioning units.
Commissioner Paulus asked Mr. Laukka the time frame for the build out for
the housing units. Mr. Laukka said he anticipates the project to be completed
within 3' -4 years depending on the market, interest rates, etc. Commissioner
Paulus asked if complete development of the park depends on completion of the
housing. She added she has some concern regarding this if the market becomes
"soft" for condominiums. Mr. Laukka said the park can be completely developed
without completion of the housing project. He added he feels very positive
about the proposed housing.
Mr. Dennis Sutliff briefed the Commission on the proposed medical office
building. He explained it will consist of six stories but visually it will
appear as five (one story is below grade). The "materials will be constructed of
reflective glass with concrete The parking allocation for the proposed medical
office building is 600 vehicles. The proposed.office building will be composed
_T._. of between 25 -28 suites.
Commissioner G. Johnson asked for clarification of the roadway route for
the proposed "jitney ". Mr. Sutliff with graphics traced the route of the jitney
which will connect the Hedberg site with Edinborough, Southdale, Galleria and
the Southdale Medical Building.
Commissioner Paulus moved to recommend final rezoning approval and final
site plan approval for Phase I subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Palmer
seconded the motion. All were in favor. Motion carried.
II. ADJOURNMENT:
The-meeting was adjourned at 9:05 p.m.
1 n Hoogenakker, Sec tary__— _ __
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
AUGUST 24, 1988
Z -87 -3 United Properties
& Hedberg Site
5 -87 -11 R -1 Single Family to MD -6
Mixed Development District
South Edina Development Company
1st Addition
The City Council granted preliminary rezoning and preliminary plat approval
for the subject development on October 12, 1987. The developers have now
submitted plans for and are requesting approval of their Overall Development
Plan and Final Site Plan approval for Phase I of the development. The Council
will also be asked to grant final plat approval.
Several things have happened since the project was granted preliminary
approval. First, the Council has approved the Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) for the development. Second, the HRA and the East Edina Housing
Foundation have approved and executed a redevelopment contract with the
developer. Third, the Zoning Ordinance has been amended to address this type of
development. The amended Ordinance allows retail as a permitted principal use
in the MD -6 district. For a project of the magnitude state law requires the
Pollution Control Agency (PCA)'to issue an Indirect Source Permit (ISP) to
insure the development does not violate air and noise pollution standards. The
PCA staff is scheduled to issue this permit on August 19, 1988.
The Overall Development Plan continues the same mixture of uses contained
in the preliminary plan. However, the intensity of the uses has been reduced.
The overall FAR for the project has been reduced from 0.95 to 0.77. The table
below illustrates the changes to the plan.
Use
Housing
Low Rise
High Rise
Total
Office
Preliminary Plan
Square Feet
or
Dwelling Units
970
530
1,500
5 Buildings 1,500,000
Retail
Includes
Health Club 343,700
Hotel
(Final) Overall Development Plan
Square Feet
or
Use Dwelling Units
Low Rise 682
Mtd /High Rise 403
1,085
Office
5 Buildings 1,256,900
Retail
No Health Club
but with theatre 240,650
Hotel
In Bloomington 250 Rooms In Bloomington 250 Rooms
Phase I
Phase I is comprised of the following uses:
Parcel B -1 Theatre: 39,050 Square Feet
8 screens and 2,644 seats
Parcel B -2 Medical Office Building:
106,900 Square Feet
Parcel C 276 Units of Low Rise Condominium Housing
Parcel D General Retail:
201,600 Square Feet
Phase I will also include acquisition of the central and north park areas.
In both areas the pond will be excavated. The west side and the amphitheater
will be completed in the central area. The east side will be graded but the
mini golf and court games will be developed later. The west edge of the north
park maybe developed in Phase I. The east side will not be completed until a
later phase.
Phase I will include the construction of Minnesota Drive, West 76th Street
and portions of Edinborough Way and Parklawn Avenue. The widening of France
Avenue is expected to coincide with Phase I development.
Phase I Housing, Parcel C, is similar to the Edinborough condos. There
are, however, some important differences. First, the units are larger and have
more varied floor-.plans than in Edinborough. The project proposes 11 unit types
ranging in size from 1,000 to 1,417 square feet in area. The units are one or
two bedroom with one plan offering two bedrooms plus a loft. The buildings have
been designed to accommodate elevators if the market requires them. The
exterior treatment will emphasize brick. Each building will have 46 units with
construction of the southwesterly building scheduled for a spring 1989 start.
Due to the size of the development and the diversity of uses it will not be
possible to use a common exterior treatment throughout the project. Although
there will be design review for each project or phase, the development will be
tied together by a common landscape architectural treatment. This will include
the type, location and size of landscaping materials, as well as sidewalks,
lighting and signage.
The southeast Edina transit way continues to be included in the
development. Vehicles would run along the westerly edge of the pond. The
actual vehicle type is still being studied. It will be a small, 20 -30
passenger, gas or electric vehicle. It may resemble a street car, but with
rubber tires.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the Overall Development Plan and Final Site
Plan approval for Phase I. The proposed uses are consistent with the approved
Preliminary Development Plan. The overall intensity of the development has been
reduced. The tax increment district has been expanded to include the entire
project and all other conditions of preliminary approval have been satisfied.
PRELIMINARY REZONING TO MDD -5 MIXED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND PRELIMINARY PLAT
GRANTED FOR HEDBERG SITE (UNITED PROPERTIES). Manager Rosland recalled that the
G C• public hearing held October 5, 1987 on the request of United Properties for
\�� preliminary rezoning to MDD -5 Mixed Development District and preliminary plat for
\�\�� the Hedberg site had been continued so that the developers and staff could provide
additional information on issues raised by the Council. The two major issues
discussed were: 1) the public park, and 2) the housing concept. Public Park - He
noted that the park design is not finalized at this point and that this unique
park is intended to compliment the indoor park at Edinborough. Manager Rosland
then presented a comprehensive review of the proposed public park and explained
the various areas for the recreational activities which would be used by the
entire community in the winter as well as during the summer months. The main
feature that would attract and bring people to the park is the path that would
encompass the water component. He said it is designed to provide recreational
opportunities for individuals and families that are not available in the existing
public park system. Cultural and performing arts events could take place in the
amphitheater area on the west side of the pond. In conclusion, he said that the
goal is to design something that meets the needs of the residents and will be good
for the whole City. Member Kelly said that she was not totally sold on the idea
of an amphitheater as. it would mean more maintenance and programming costs. She
said that in looking at the various cost figures for the project there is no
provision for depreciation as for the City's other enterprises, e.g. Braemar
Arena, Art Center, Gun Range. She also expressed concern about additional
liability for the City because of the water element and that according to the
Police Department report approximately 40% of the calls come from southeast Edina.
Manager Rosland responded that the policy has been that depreciation on those
enterprises have never been funded and that only the operating fund losses are
funded. As to liability he said there are existing parks now such as Cornelia
which have water and that it is possible that insurance premiums may go up some
because of this added facility. Regarding emergency calls from the southeast
Edina area, that is mainly because of the concentration of commercial and senior
population in that quadrant. Emergency services to that area will have to be
strengthened and that is the purpose of the monthly fees and the contribution to
the operating trust fund. Member Smith commented that he still has not seen what
it is that will bring people to the proposed park. He asked if it would be a
civic kind of activity or the sell that you would not have to bike down to Lake
Harriet because the City now has a large passive park in Edina that would attract
residents to the park. He also asked how much public parking would be available
for individuals who wish to use the park and why there is a need for a park office
building. In response, Manager Rosland said that it would be both, that this park
will be programmed to coordinate with Edinborough activities and that it would
fill the need to go to an area like Lake Harriet. Parking would be shared with
the office and commercial areas which would approximate 2,000 spaces. The
recreational building would have multi -uses, e.g, warming house in the winter and
other uses in the summer months. As to upkeep of an ice skating area, he said it
would not require the maintenance expense that is associated with the upkeep of
hockey rinks. Member Richards asked what the scale is of the green space
surrounding the water, both on the residential side and the commercial side. It
was explained that the green space from the water to the residential /commercial
ranges from 50 feet to 125 feet in depth, and that the total water area is just
over 10 acres in size. .Boyd Stofer, representing United Properties, pointed out
that the two bridges over the water are grade separated which permit the park to
operate as a continuous event without having to cross the public streets. He
added that one of the important concepts behind the park is the formality of it,
not necessarily the volume of it and that approximately one -third of the total
site is devoted to the public park. It was designed as a formal arrangement with
a lot of intricate areas for people to gather. Housing Concept - Larry Laukka
made the presentation on the housing concept for the project summarized as
follows. The concern expressed by the Council was for a broadening of the mix of
housing potentials in the Hedberg site versus what was accomplished in the
Edinborough project. He reviewed the planning process for the Edinborough project
and explained the development of the public park concept in the mixed use project;
a public use that would allow the developers to bring office, elderly, rental and
for sale people together in a hub manner with the park as a basic, formal
separation that would also allow them to inter -act with one another. The cultural
side (performing and fine arts) is yet to be developed and can be done
tangentially at the Hedberg site and will provide for the community what
Edinborough does not have. A social fabric needs to be established in the
Edinborough communities so that they participate in the park programs and become
involved in it. Mr. Laukka said he could foresee the same thing happening at the
Hedberg site but in an entirely different fashion. There is an opportunity for a
full arena of recreational choices for not just the young people in the community
but for everyone else. There is a need to work towards the cultural side of
Edina's recreational and play activities. In summary he stated that we need to go
to work on the Edina cultural need and that we should use these developments to
try to make it happen. In reference to the public park, Member Richards
interjected that the private sector has moved faster than the public sector in the
project development; that he was troubled by someone saying that a lineal park
with an average of 75 feet in depth around the water element is the right
dimension for the public component of this proposed project. He said that as he
has spoken to other Council members he is troubled that he doesn't know and has to
know before the public sector can move hand in hand with the private sector. He
said time has been spent in trying to analyze what the private development will be
without fully understanding what the public development is going to be. Mr.
Laukka submitted that more time has been spent by the project development team on
the 24 acre park element of the project than with anything else on the master
plan. Lists have been generated, discussions and arguments have taken place about
what should be there and how the public park would work. He said his position is
that without that kind of facility in mixed use developments he is out of it. He
said people would not buy into an. environment that doesn't work. The lineal park
with the water body will be in-an urban setting that is dense and is vital to the
success of the project. Mr. Laukka added that he has asked the project team to
place all the housing on the east side of the water by an exchange of the housing
on Site B -1 with the proposed office building on Site E -2. He said he feels that
makes sense so that all the housing is on the east soft edge of the water. As to
the park and the programming of it, he stated that he felt it was not possible to
design a successful program today that would deal with all the needs of the
community and that the park will have to be flexible. That is the purpose of the
soft edge; it is a place for the residents of the project to come out in the sun.
The hard edge is the commercial side of the project, very urban, and an active
side where people will go to work, to a movie, to a restaurant, etc. and then
leave. He noted that people are coming to the Edinborough Park because it is
there and that they are using the facility. Mr. Stofer said that what we are
really talking about is a concept - does it make sense and has it been thought
through so that it can go forward and be developed successfully. Secondly, the
project has to be looked on as a whole package. It isn't just a park but is a
mixed use project that involves 1500 housing units, 1,500,000 square feet of
office space and the commercial development which through the vehicle of tax
increment financing will pay for a public amenity like this and bring something
back to the community. It is 90 acres that is master planned and, when put in
this kind of concept and under the HRA's control, will enable the City to choose
its destiny in southeast Edina as opposed to letting development happen.
Returning to the housing concept, Mr. Laukka said he had not designed a package of
housing for the project. They looked initially at the continuation of the market
served at Edinborough which had specific mandates which have been served. It is
felt that it can be carried on into the Hedberg project in much the same manner.
There is a strong market for the first time home buyer under age forty, that earns
less than $38,000. There will likely be a rental facility zone that will be
moderate to luxury rental housing. A third market will be aimed at: a) the empty
nester, 40 -55 years old, wanting living space in excess of 1,000 square feet, 2
bedrooms plus, spending range of $125/140,000, and b) moving residents out of east
Edina, the Morningside area or the far east side to free up those modest homes.
He said both of these markets will be researched as to their potential and that
they will have to proceed cautiously in determining those potential buyers.
Marketing of the housing units will be done by means of a model of the project
so that potential buyers can actually see how the entire project will look.
Member Smith asked if the housing units would be mixed. Mr. Laukka said that the
moderate and the up scale units would be mixed and would be an architectural
requirement for the project. Member Turner commented that one-of the objectives
of the mixed use development is to provide affordable housing for people who work
in the area and that we should not lose sight of that. Mr. Laukka responded that
in Edinborough 25% of the residents work in either Edina, Richfield or Bloomington
and that 8% are retired. In looking at the continued development of the I -494
corridor, he said that communities need to look at putting a housing component
into the typical commercial development. Data from European and West Coast
examples supports the fact that people are victims of convenience and want to live
close to where they work and in the nicest community they can afford. No further
comment being heard, Member Turner moved preliminary rezoning to MDD -S and
preliminary plat approval, subject to conditions: 1) Final rezoning," final plat
approval, and the granting of a Conditional Use Permit for retail sales, 2)
Amendment of the Zoning Ordinance to allow the development pursuant to the master
plan as approved by the Council, 3) Approval by the Council of an Environmental
Impact Statement for the proposed development, and 4) Execution of a redevelopment
contract between the developer and Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority as
approved by the Council, with First Reading of the ordinance and adoption of the
resolution as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A20
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825)
BY ADDING TO THE MIXED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PRD -5)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 6 or Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding
the following thereto:
"The extent of the Mixed Development District (Sub - District MDD -5) is enlarged
by the addition of the following property:
Tract A:
Parcel I:
The South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 32,
Township 28 North, Range 24, except the West 50 feet thereof, according
to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate in Hennepin
County, Minnesota.
Abstract Property.
Parcel II:
The Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 32, Township 28, North,
Range 24, except that part platted as Eden Place Addition; and except the
West 50 feet thereof; and except that part described as beginning at the
Southwest corner of said Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4; thence North
along the West line thereof a distance of 43.0 feet; thence East parallel
with the South line of said Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 a distance of
50 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence
South parallel with the West line of said Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4
a distance of 10.0 feet; thence East parallel with the South line of said
Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 a distance of 10.0 feet; thence
Northwesterly on a straight line to the actual point of beginning, according
to the United States Government Survey thereof and situated in Hennepin
County, Minnesota.
Abstract Property.
Parcel IV: -
The West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 32,
Township 28 North, Range 24, except the West 50 feet thereof; and except
that part described as beginning at the Northwest corner of said
Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4; thence South along the West line thereof
a distance of 43 feet; thence East parallel with the North line of said
Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 a distance of 50.0 feet to the actual
point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence North parallel with
the Vest line of said Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 a distance of 10.0
feet; thence East parallel with the North line of said Southwest 1/4 of the
Southwest 1/4 a distance of 10.0 feet; thence Southwesterly on a straight
line to the actual point of beginning, according to the United States
Government Survey thereof and situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Abstract Property.
Tract B:
Parcel II:
That part of the North One -half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 5,
Township 27, Range 24, described as beginning at a point on the North line
thereof 1304.875 feet West along said North line from the Northeast corner of
the Northwest Quarter of said Section 5; thence West along said North line
354.75 feet; thence South, parallel to the East line of said Northwest
Quarter, 475.5 feet; thence Northeasterly to a point which is 327.7 feet
South along a line drawn parallel to the East line of said Northwest Quarter
from the point of beginning; thence North along said last described parallel
line to the point of beginning, according to the United States Government
Survey thereof and situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota.
And
That part of the South One -half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 32,
Township 28, Range 24, described as beginning at a point on the South line
thereof 1304.875 feet West along said South line from the Southeast corner of
the Southwest Quarter of said Section 32; thence West along said South line
354.75 feet; thence North, parallel to the East line of said.Southvest
Quarter, to the North line of the South One -half of the Southwest Quarter
of said Section 32; thence East along said North line 354.75 feet, more or
less, to an intersection with a line drawn North, parallel to the East line
of said Southwest Quarter, from the point of beginning; thence South along
said last described parallel line to the point of beginning, according to the
United States Government Survey thereof and situate in Hennepin.County,
Minnesota.
Being registered land as is evidenced by Certificate of Title No. 388764."
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage
and publication.
RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT
- FOR UNITED PROPERTIES
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "(Name to be determined)" platted by United Properties, a
division of The Northland Company, a Minnesota corporation, and presented at the
special meeting of the City Council of 12, 1987, be and is hereby granted
preliminary plat approval.
Motion for preliminary rezoning and plat approval was seconded by Member Smith.
Member Turner commented that she supported the development because it is exciting,
it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the amended Southeast Edina
Redevelopment Plan and specifically the area goals to ameliorate traffic
congestion, achieve housing, accomplish the storm water holding pond and the park,
but also an opportunity to develop the last major piece of property in the City in
a unique manner that benefits the whole community. She stated that prior to final,
approval she will look for a resolution of these major concerns: 1) Traffic Area -'
that in Phase I the four road improvements mentioned in the BRW traffic report
would be constructed, that Travel Demand Management methods would be included,
that the sidewalks as now shown on the master plan would be constructed, that the
transit way would be specifically defined, and that in Phase II the project would
be subject to the I -494 Corridor Study recommendations and may have to be staged
to match capacity in the I -494 corridor or some traffic mitigation methods to
accommodate traffic generated from the site; 2) Housing Area - that in Phase I
there be a mix of housing that would include affordable housing for those who
would work in this area; 3) City Services - that services be self- supporting. She
added that she liked the idea of the theatre use and the proposed hotel because
both those uses would be off -peak trip generators and complimentary to the office
buildings. Member Smith commented that he hoped the developers would do
everything they could to enhance recycling in the development; that in order to
draw people to the park it should be convenient and look like more space rather
than proprietary space for the neighborhood; and that the project should make a
dramatic statement. Member Kelly indicted her support for the project and said
that a fine development team has been put together,.that there is a good mix of
uses, that she hoped it would develop as a world class statement, that she had
reservations about mixing the housing, that she was not ready to commit to a
programmed park and that the project should not be rushed. Member Richards said
he shared Member Kelly's concerns and would support the project with reluctance
although he was not sure the footprint of the development is a good one that we
can live with.
Mayor Courtney then called for a rollcall vote on the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
First Reading granted; resolution adopted.
The meeting was adjourned by Mayor Courtney at 9:00 p.m.
City Clerk
�gI13A,
ch
Nry �y°
• RPON.t�
,BOB
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Kenneth Rosland
From: Craig Larsen
Date: September 12, 1988
Subject: Appeal of a Board of
Appeals decision for
B -88 -8, Masica
6817 Valley View Road
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
111 •
A.
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
0
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
0
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Uphold Board of Appeals decision to deny the variance.
Info /Background:
This variance was twice heard by the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, March
17 and August 18, 1988. The variance request was denied by the Board on
August 18, 1988.
The proponents are requesting a 16 foot front yard setback variance. They
would like to maintain a 34 foot setback from Valley View Road for the new
house. The required setback is 50 feet. The Board found that no hardship
existed and that there was an adequate building pad available while
observing the 50 foot setback.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS
HELD ON THURSDAY, AUGUST 18, 1988 AT 5:30 P.M.
EDINA CITY HALL MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT: Helen McClelland, John Bailey and Jane Paulus
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES:
Mr. Bailey moved for approval of the April 21, 1988 Board of Appeals and
Adjustments Meeting Minutes. Mrs. McClelland seconded the motion. All were in
favor. Motion carried.
II. OLD BUSINESS: B -88 -8, Masica, 6817 Valley View Road
Mr. Dommer reminded the Board in March of this year the proponent submitted
a plan for a new dwelling which proposed a 22 foot front yard setback. The
dwelling was nearly 3 stories tall at the closest point to Valley View Road.
The item was heard before the Board of Appeals where the proponent withdrew the
plan and indicated a revised plan would be proposed.
Mr. Dommer added the revised plan plan illustrates a 34 foot front yard
setback which is the same setback as the home which is to be removed. The
height'of the building at its closest point has been reduced to two stories.
The garage has also been redesigned and has been pushed further into the hill on
the east side of the property.
Mr. Dommer explained the required setback of 50 feet has not changed since
the original proposal. The required setback is an average of the homes between
intersections on the southeast side of Valley View Road. The range of setbacks
used to determine the average is between 30 feet and 74 feet.
The proponent, Mr. and Mrs. Masica were present. Mr. James Van Valkenberg,
attorney representing Mr. and Mrs. Masica was present and Mr. William Devlin,
architect was present.
Mr. Van Valkenberg pointed out to the Board the unusual shape of the lot.
He explained if the conforming setback is applied it would be almost virtually
impossible to develop due to the unusual shape and topography. The useable
buildable portion of the lot is minimal.
Mr. Masica explained if the conforming setbacks are applied the site would
have little rear yard. He added the rear yard would only extend '60 feet back.
Mr. Van Valkenberg added the neighbors are in agreement with the proposal and
have - voiced no objections.
Mr. William Devlin, explained the reason for difficulty in house placement
is due to the existing location of the driveway. The existing drive location
must be implemented into the proposed design because of the steep topography.
This hardship necessitates creativity in house placement. Mr. Masica pointed
out the grade of the hill in the front is at 22 feet.
Mrs. McClelland said in viewing this proposal she finds no hardship that
would support approval of the requested variance. Mrs. Paulus added Edina has
• very few undeveloped lots available. She pointed out that presently there seems
to be a pattern emerging in Edina of purchasing homes and raising them. All new
construction must_ then conform to existing City standards. Mrs. Paulus noted
in this instance she cannot find a hardship for violating the required front
yard setback. Mr. Devlin reminded the Board the..existing drive poses a problem
- - --- -for the Masica's; adding the existing drive in a sense is a hardship. Another
aspect of this variance that should be considered is that in reality the
Masica's are requesting a side yard variance. Mr. Dommer clarified that
statement by responding that regardless of site placement of the home the front
setback is considered as that which is perpendicular to the right of way. Mr.
Masica added he feels the proposed setback is not out of character for the
neighborhood, continuing that it is not unreasonable to want to construct a home
that has a large enough rear yard to be enjoyed by its owners. He pointed out
there are trees that should be preserved and in the future a swimming pool may
be constructed. Mrs. Paulus responded there are options that may have to be
considered by the proponent if a large year yard is important, one is that the
topography of this lot may make it virtually impossible to have a large enough
rear yard for entertaining and to support a pool, since this issue is important
to the proponent the square footage of the house's footprint may have to be
reduced to accommodate this need or a complete redesign may have to be
considered. Mrs. McClelland said the City must also be careful when granting
approval that an unwanted precedent is not established. The Board carefully
studies each case, and pays careful attention to requests for front yard setback
variances, the steep topography of this site is not unusual for houses in Indian
Hills and Mrs. McClelland said she believes a house can be more creatively
placed that does not require such an extensive variance. Mrs. Masica said she
understood that each variance requested is considered on its own merits and
individuality. Mr. Bailey responded that each variance request is considered
individuality and each case is unique but in this instance in my opinion a
hardship cannot be found, sacrifices may have to be made either in elimination
of the pool, or reduction of the footprint or a complete redesign, but it should
be noted that topography in some instances dictates that not all lots can be
developed to meet the day to day living needs of the property owner. Sacrifices
may have to be made and options reconsidered to develop this lot appropriately
and within City standards.
Mrs. Paulus moved for variance denial. Mr. Bailey seconded the motion.
All voted aye. Motion carried.
Mrs. McClelland informed the Masica's their option to appeal this decision
to the City Council.
NUMBER
LOCATION
REQUEST
B -88 -8
6817 Valley View Road
A 28 foot front yard setback variance to construct
a new dwelling
EDINA PLANNING D� =ARTME
THOMSEN
NYBECK
JOHNSON
BOUQUET
•VAN VALKENBURG
OHNSTAD & -
SMITH, P.A.
LAW OFFICES
SUITE 600, EDINBOROUGH CORPORATE CENTER EAST
3300 EDINBORO UGH WAY, MINNEAPOLIS (EDINA),
MINNESOTA 55435 -
(61 2) 835 -7000
. GLENN G. NYBECK
DONALD D. SMITH
OF COUNSEL:
GORDON V. JOHNSON
MARSH J. HALBERG
JACK W. CARLSON
JOHN K. BOUQUET
DENNIS M. PATRICK
RICHARD D. WILSON, P.A.
JAMES VAN VALKENBURG
._ PHILIP SIEFF
STEVEN J. OUAM
MARK G. OHNSTAD
-
HELGE THOMSEN, RETIRED.
JOHN R. PRAETORIUS, RETIRED
August 22, 1988
Mr. Philip, S. Dcmmer
Associate Planner
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
RE: James G. and Linda M.
Masica
5817 Valley View Road
D -88 -8
Dear P ",i 1 :
This is our formal notice of an appeal from the decision of
the Board of Appeals on August 18, 1988. I would appreciate it if
You would forward me a copy of the Order as finally entered by the
Board.
Council? When would you guess this would be heard by the City
If it could be heard on either Sept,elnber«:"tr 19th that
would be fine.
I also am aware of the fact that on the 19th they have a
long agenda and it might be that you would prefer to have it on the
12th.
In otherwords we would like to get this heard and resolved.
Yours tr 1
JVV:jd a s Van Val urg
cc: Mr. James Masica
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Edina Board of Appeals and Adjustments
FROM: Philip S. Dommer, Associate Planner
DATE: August 18, 1988
SUBJECT: B -88 -8, Plan Revision
James G. and Linda M. Masica
6817- Valley View Road
In March of this year the proponent submitted a plan for' a new dwelling
which proposed a 22 foot front yard setback. The dwelling was nearly 3 stories
tall at the closest point to Valley View Road. The item was heard before the
Board of Appeals where the proponent withdrew the plan and indicated a revised
plan would_be proposed. .
The revised plan has been submitted and is attached. The plan illustrates
a 34 foot front yard setback which is the same setback as the home which is to
be removed. The height of the building at its closest point has been reduced to
two stories. The garage has also been redesigned and has been pushed further
into the hill.on the east side of the property.
The required setback of 50 feet has not changed since the original
proposal. The required setback is an average of the homes between intersections
on the southeast side of Valley View Road. The range of setbacks used to
determine the average is between 30 feet and 74 feet.
Please refer to the attached new plan, and the March 17, 1988 meeting
minutes and the original staff report.
REVISED "NEW" PLAN
SIoPE'D
-
.7.
L10),
s—
-� -: ----
qgb 1
1
lo'
IL
-'-
N
DENOttS 'pRopo$�U �{a,Se`
�iIIBF =s DeaotES Exs:sf:��6. Hcl„SE
24PosE0 6L6Vi17110N5 XXY - OENoTES EX /5T /NG ELEV,4T /oN
" Fto o - (M) - DENOTE S PROPOSED EL6YAT/O/l
- ,06NOTE5 O /RECT/oN CF FLOW
/
i-
FouNoATioN- oP SuRFAcE OR.4INAUE
n /�
AREA
i
LOT SIZE: 33, 88LA SQ
q3
-ISE.: SIZE:
:OVERAGE:
�--
q)q {L
xO
t
---_
IN
I 91-:zv
:.'
Q .
,,� •:J .,
�.
g39f - by ; 9 - _ ..
- .
Z.0
9
---
•r EXISTING -a
Q
Gar
h i•FSE .4 N
cjk�s3
,..-
SIoPE'D
-
.7.
L10),
s—
-� -: ----
qgb 1
1
lo'
IL
-'-
N
DENOttS 'pRopo$�U �{a,Se`
�iIIBF =s DeaotES Exs:sf:��6. Hcl„SE
LLLrj]�M rLAn
m
V
m
4-1 t;
m
z
m
EO
0] 00�� 00��
u mill
n`-AS ci,, -yai�2n
m
m.
OC
ra
m
v
-z
m
r
a
z
r
54.LE: I••= Zp�
' 0.� = ° °SGO 6LEV.a TioNS ]•XY OE,vo:TES EX/57 /NG EL�Vi. T�oN
' GA^rAGE P,:pc,C- (�'v� OEh'JTL -S P,.�JPJSEO c(E Y,-1 T.'On/
%c4° OF iJUNO.a r,'ON. �' - Gdn'J T6 21W,: ZT•,oN cr- FLOW
c•' SuRFAcE OC.i ///aCwE
AREA
LOT SIZE: 33, Sati
HSE. SIZE:
lo
COVERAGE:
\ BUILDABLE AREA
00
y9\
N
b
�1
0
;r
/ X39 {1'
I
i � S
� try
�?-
o �
qjy •• J1
MIS.00
EDINA BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS
STAFF REPORT
MARCH 17, 1988 ,
B -88 -8 James C. and Linda M. Masica
6817 Valley View Road
Part of Lot 41
Braemar .Hills
Zoning: R -1
Request: A 28 foot front yard setback variance to construct
a new dwelling.
The subject property is currently developed with a 1 1/2 story dwelling and a
detached, garage. The proponents desire to remove the dwelling and garage and
construct a new home. The proposed location of the new dwelling is 22 feet from
the front property line.
The required setback is determined by an average of the homes be the
closest intersections on the southeast side of Valley View Road. The calculated
average is a 50 foot setback. The greatest setback is -74 feet, the least is 30
feet. The existing dwelling which is to be removed has a 34 foot setback.
The lot is heavily wooded and has some sloping topography. In the center of
the site, however, a large building pad exists within the required setbacks and
between slope lines. See Figure 2. In fact, the proposed dwelling could fit
within this area if it were rotated counter clockwise.
One advantage to the lot is that the building pad is set up above the street
grade about 20 feet and is wooded. This helps reduce the impact of a reduced
setback. In this instance, however, the structure is a full three stories at its
closest point and will rise substantially over the street. Refer to the
photograph in Figure 3 of the existing dwelling which is 12 feet further back than
the proposed dwelling.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recognizes that the setbacks used to determine the requirement vary
greatly and therefore under certain circumstances, it, would be reasonable to relax
the setback requirement. Under the current propoa, however, the plan is not
based. on any unusual circumstances at, the site and substantially alters the
character of the neighborhood. Staff would therefore recommend denial of the
request.
r
L
OR.�. °OSLJ 6GE V.3TioN$ YXY - DENOTES EX/ST,�N.: ECE Vr7 T /oN
Lowesr Fc.xc•-
4�R,.a4e
ToP Of i0[/NOAT,•oN- - G6NOTc 5 .� /,r: =CT . N 0- F;: O LV
of
AREA
LOT SIZE: FT
HSE. SIZE:
COVERAGE:
n�
o�
�r
"N
z
/VA
- -Z►= -- \
r
/
/
1
��= I
-4-88-8' James G. and Linda M. Masica
C- 6817 Valley View Road
GJ Part.of Lot 41
Braemar Hills
�\ Request: A 28 foot front yard setback variance to construct
anew dwelling. -
Mr. Dommer told the Board the subject property is currently developed with
a 1 1/2 story dwelling and a detached garage. The proponents desire to remove
the dwelling and garage and construct a new home. The proposed location of the
new dwelling is 22 feet from the front property line.
Mr.. Dommer explained the required setback is determined by an average of
the homes between the closest intersections on the southeast side of Valley View
Road. The calculated average is a SO foot setback. The greatest setback is 74
feet, the least is 30 feet. The existing dwelling which is to be removed has a
34 foot setback.
Mr. Dommer pointed out the lot is heavily wooded and has some sloping
topography. In the center of the site, however, a large building pad exists
within the required setbacks and between slope lines. See Figure 2. In fact,
the proposed dwelling could fit within this area if it were rotated counter
clockwise.
One advantage to the lot is that the building pad is set up above the
street grade about 20 feet and is wooded. This helps reduce the impact of a
reduced setback. In this instance, however, the structure is a full three
stories at its closest point and will rise substantially over the street. Refer
to the photograph in Figure 3 of the existing dwelling which is 12 feet further
back than the proposed dwelling.
Mr. Dommer concluded staff recognizes that the setbacks used to determine
the requirement vary greatly and therefore under certain circumstances it would
be reasonable to relax the setback requirement. Under the current proposal,
however, the plan is not based on any unusual circumstances at the site and
substantially alters the character of the neighborhood. Staff would therefore
recommend denial of the request.
Mr.. Masica the proponent and Bill Devlin of Harvey Homes was present.
Mr. Masica explained to the Board the reasons for the needed variance
request is to maintain the character and symmetry of the neighborhood and work
within the elevations of the property. He added a large reason for the request
is to construct a new dwelling and retain a back yard., Mr. G. Johnson pointed
out the previous footprint could be used as a guideline for the proposed house.
Mrs. McClelland told Mr. Masica the Board is very strict about granting front
yard setback variances-when they are self imposed. Mrs. McClelland commented
that the request for a 2$ foot front yard setback is below the City's current
front yard setback standard. Mr. Bill Devlin of Harvey Homes explained to the
Board the reason for difficulty in home placement is due to the current driveway
placement adding the easement for the existing driveway must be used. Mr.
ioI-aiu Uric iLUiL rree:
disturb the existing vegetation and maintain a rear ya3
Mr. Devlin pointed out the neighbors in the area also (
fruit trees removed. Board members told Mr. Masica a
have to re- design the placement of the house to conforn
of the land, the present houses footprint and maintain
standards. Mrs. Paulus commented the square footage of
reduced to allow Mr. Masica the vegetation and the reaz
property. Mr. Lewis agreed with Ms. Paulus observatior
have to be worked out due to the topography of the lot
setback in the neighborhood. Mr. G. Johnson said at tr
Masica has three options if the Board recommends denial
decision for denial to the City Council, 2) withdrawing
time to redesign the house. or, 3) having the item tab
before this Board at a later date, which would allow ti
on Lne property, not
d for use by his family.
o not want to see the
nd Mr. Devlin they may
more with the topography
front yard setback
the house may have to be
yard he desires for this
adding a compromise may
and the established
is time he feels Mr.
1) appeal the
the request, allowing
Led, to be brought back
ne for redesign.
Mr. Masica withdrew his request stating he needs time to redesign the house
to better fit the topography of the lot.
Mrs. McClelland moved to accept Mr.
recommendation if Mr. Masica requests to
Adjustments within a one year time frame
$50.00 variance fee will be waived. Mr.
in favor. The motion carried.
II. ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting adjourned at 6:10 p.m.
Masica's withdrawal with the
appear before the Board of Appeals and
from. this date (March 17, 1988) the
Lewis seconded the motion. All were
�a in hoogenakker, Se- e�retary
5-
C�
_ ch
O
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
Recommendation:
Approve Lot Division.
Agenda Item # III. B.
Consent Fx�
Information Only ❑
Mgr . Recommends [] To HRA
0 To Council
Action Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Info /Background:
Fairview Hospital has purchased 20,814 square feet of excess Crosstown highway
right of way from Hennepin County. This action will allow the transfer of
the land from the County �to the hospital.
To:
Kenneth Rosland
From:
Craig Larsen
Date:
September 12, 1988
Subject:
LD -88 -9 -
Fairview Southdale
Hospital, BTO Deve.
6401 France Avenue So.
Recommendation:
Approve Lot Division.
Agenda Item # III. B.
Consent Fx�
Information Only ❑
Mgr . Recommends [] To HRA
0 To Council
Action Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Info /Background:
Fairview Hospital has purchased 20,814 square feet of excess Crosstown highway
right of way from Hennepin County. This action will allow the transfer of
the land from the County �to the hospital.
I-OCAT30PI MAP
I
NUMBER LD -88 -9
L O C A TI O N Fairview Southdale Hospital
6401 France Avenue
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF PRESENT: Philip Dommer, Jackie Hoogenakker
P.C. MEMBERS PRESENT: Bailey, L. Johnson, D. Johnson, McClelland, G. Johnson,
QLewis, Runyan, Palmer, Paulus, Workinger.
�1, LD -88 -9 BTO Development Corporation
Fairview Southdale Hospital Healthcare Services Corporation
6401 France Avenue South
Mr. Dommer informed the Commission Fairview Southdale Hospital and
Healthcare Services Corporation is applying for a simple lot division of their
property to annex approximately 20,814 square feet from the Hennepin County
C.A.S.H. Number 62 right -of -way. This is necessary to maintain appropriate
setbacks between the parking ramp and the crosstown highway.
Mr. Dommer concluded staff recommends approval.
Mr. Allan Hill representing BTO Development Corporation was present.
Commissioner L. Johnson moved for approval. Commissioner Workinger
seconded the motion. All were in favor. Motion carried.
EDINA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
SEPTEMBER 7, 1988 - - -
LD -88 -9 BTO Development Corporation
Fairview Southdale Hospital Healthcare Services Corporation
6401 France Avenue South
Fairview Southdale Hospital and Healthcare Services Corporation is applying
for a simple lot division of their property to annex approximately 20,814 square
feet from the Hennepin County C.A.S.H. Number 62 right -of -way. This is
necessary to maintain appropriate setbacks between the parking ramp and the
crosstown highway.
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval.
\ -
AS —BUILT SURVEY FOR / r»
J 1++� uw wwwr
SOUTHDALE PHYSICIANS DEVELOPMENT ASSOC.
4" CIO
n�.. 1.•. M...0 1 t w1 I_u Y •EMI a twuuNU u n N .w.r `\ / • /y
IwA Ipy " M,•bM.NNI .N M N . ` MI /
\�j• a
•.Ir lr u•L - - -
63TN lTReET
Ar.•r� u+rw w w.+.w w 0%o".1 - - ri:iilii Rr... ELnnm GAwa. Irrt
n:.:. i.11w .... I►1..., i.1.... .R.1.rw •.... a..rr•
r..... Y.�iii i:.:..""..:" ;.� •»� ••• •• •••r• �.•• -a• r w..r � .rrw wmn.luas s�Iwr.r.r .�.
���IIW
i
PROPERTY TO K ACQUIRED
TOTAL 4KA- 0.479r
�
20614
•
ORIGINAL
i
/
>•' TOTAL AREA-13.24—
h
TOTAL BLDG AREA•16 45MO
( (!
f -�
�
�
� MIw111 M 1•w/..
�
�:
n
.rr.r w• �m
JI
a'''te
.,,..
a oTS
x _...... ,...._........ "
l
a
I
.
•.Ir lr u•L - - -
63TN lTReET
Ar.•r� u+rw w w.+.w w 0%o".1 - - ri:iilii Rr... ELnnm GAwa. Irrt
n:.:. i.11w .... I►1..., i.1.... .R.1.rw •.... a..rr•
r..... Y.�iii i:.:..""..:" ;.� •»� ••• •• •••r• �.•• -a• r w..r � .rrw wmn.luas s�Iwr.r.r .�.
���IIW
Legal Description for Fairview Southdale Hospital
That part'of Lots 2 and 3, Cassin's Outlots
according to the recorded plat thereof,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying northerly
of West 65th Street, southerly of County Road
No. 62, westerly of the west line of Lot 1,
Block 1, SOUTHDALE ACRES, according to the
recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, and easterly of France Avenue South
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute various separate
parcels:
Parcel A:
That part of Lots 2 and 3, Cassin's Outlots according to the recorded plat
thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying northerly of West 65th Street,
southerly of County Road No. 62, westerly of the west line of Lot 1, Block 1,
SOUTHDALE ACRES, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, and easterly of France Avenue South
and
Parcel B:
That part of Parcel 1, 2 and 3 as described in Certificate of Title number
608806 lying within highway easement Doc. No. 576247 described as a 25 foot
strip and a 50 foot strip adjoining a 125 foot parallel line described in
said easement , which lies southeasterly of a line drawn parallel with and
distant 50 feet southeasterly of the following described line:
Beginning at a point on the West line of Section 29, Township 28 North
Range 24 West, distant 1107.1 feet north of the West 1/4 corner
thereof; thence run easterly at an angle of 74 degrees 24 minutes (as
measured from north to east) for a distance of 124.1 feet; thence
deflect left along a tangential curve having a radius of 1527.89 feet
(delta angle 19 degrees 23 minutes) for a distance of 516.9 feet;
thence tangent to said curve for a distance of 30 feet; thence deflect
left along a tangential curve having a radius of 716.2 feet, (delta
angle 16 degree 59 minutes) for a distance of 212.3 feet; thence
tangent to curve to the intersection with the base line of said 125
foot parallel line; thence northeasterly along said 125 foot base line
of parallel line to the east line of said parcel 3 and there
terminating.
WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to combine said tracts into
the following new and separate parcel:
Parcel A and Parcel B as described above
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said
parcel as a separate tract of land does not interfere with the purposes of the
Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance
Nos. 801 and 825;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcel as'a separate tract land is
hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and
Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said conveyance thereof as a separate
tract of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other
provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no subdivision be
made of said Parcel unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the
City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by
those ordinances.
ADOPTED this 12th day of •September, 1988.
STATE OF MINNESOTA ) .
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and
correct copy of the resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its
Regular Meeting of September 12, 1988 and as recorded in the Minutes of said
Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 16th day of October, 1989.
Marcella. M. Daehn
City Clerk
�1
o e
,, 0
i�, ��
•'��RPoP�'S£O •
BB8
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
Kenneth Rosland
Agenda Item $# III.
C.
From:
Craig Larsen
Consent
-
Information Only
❑
Date:
September 12; 1988
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
S -88 -7, Berenberg
To Council
First Addition, Lot 1,
Block 1, Hilldale
Action
[]
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation: ,
Continue public hearing to October 3, 1988.
Info /Background:
Due to a conflict with a religious holiday; Mr. Berenberg has requested
we reschedule the hearing on the proposed subdivision for October 3, 1988.
Staff has notified neighborhood representatives of this change.
o ,,e,,
ch
-may
1eee
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis Hoffman�/')
City Engineer V
Date: 9 September, 1988
Subject: Vacation of Willson
Drive on Plat of
"Edenmoor"
Recommendation:
Approve vacation of street.
Info /Background:
Agenda Item #
Ty-A.
Consent
0
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
R]
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Lots 1, 2, and 3 of Block 3, Edenmoor plat (see attached) is being replatted by
Harvey Swenson. This replat has been granted preliminary plat. The south end
of Lot 3 had excess right -of -way which is not necessary for the new replat.
The new roadway will be on the north side of Lot 3. All utility companies
find the vacation request acceptable. The City staff recommends approval subject
to final plat being granted.
4,9S�.rti
° 0 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00
DATE: 8 September, 1988 _ AGENDA ITEM VI. A.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: (1983 or Newer) Used Hydraulic Articulated Motor Grad
Company Amount of Quote or &d
1• Ziegler, Inc.
1 - $ 67,000.00
2. Carlson's Lake State Equip.
2. $ 82,500.00
3. Carlson's Lake State Equip.
3. $ 90,680.00
4.
4.
5.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Ziegler, Inc. $ 67,000.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This purchase is to replace a 1958 Huber -Warco grader. The purchase price
for this used piece is excellent and the condition is excellent for our
City use. A comparable price for a new piece similar to this unit would
be $115,000.00. This purchase would be funded from the equipment replace-
ment fund.
The Recommended bid is X
within budget not
Public Works - Streets
Department
Kenneth Rosland, City
Ilin,
Director
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Fran Hoffman, Director of Public Works
FROM: Gene Bartz, Superintendent of Public Works
SUBJECT: Used (1983) Caterpillar Motor Grader
DATE: August 30, 1988
On Wednesday, August 24, 1988, Steve Johnson, Purchasing Agent; Clyde
Brown, Shop Foreman; Dave Adams, Operator and I inspected a 1983
Caterpillar Motor Grader with Tom Reddin, Area Manager for Ziegler, Inc.
We were all extremely.impressed with the quality of the machine.
The grader showed no sign of wear due in part, I'm sure, to the fact that
it has always been housed indoors. The only change I foresee would be
2 new tires on the left side of the machine which would bring the
machine into accordance with our specifications. Mr. Reddin of Ziegler, Inc.
agreed that such a change would be possible.
Taking into account the aforementioned comments, I feel the subject machine
would be a definate asset to our fleet and recommend its purchase.
GB: jr
A.
° ' REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor •& City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE 8 September, 1988
AGENDA ITEM vI • s
ITEM DESCRIPTION: One Ton Pavement Roller
Companv
1. Ruffridge Johnson Equip. Co., Inc.
2., Aspen Equipment
3.
4.
5.
Amount of Quote or Bid
1. $ 5,843.00
2. $ 6,120.00
3.
4.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Ruff ridge Johnson $ 5,843.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This purchase is to replace a'1960 Rosco pavement roller. This unit will
be purchased through the equipment replacement fund. The unit being
replaced no longer can be repaired due to lack of available parts.
Si ature
The Recommended bid is --�-
within budget not
Public Works - Streets
Department
Kenneth Rosland,'City Manager
Director
e I
_)C;
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To: KEN ROSLAND,-MANAGER
From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK
Date: SEPTEMBER 9, 1988
Subject: TEMPORARY ON -SALE
LIQUOR LICENSE FOR
EDINAMITE
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # VTT.A
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends To HRA
To Council
Action 0 Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
That the Council approve issuance of a temporary On -sale Liquor License to
The Edina Foundation in. connection with EDINAMITE to be held on October 15.
Info /Background:
The Edina Foundation has applied for a temporary On -sale Liquor License in
connection with EDINAMITE to be held at Edinborough Park on October 15, 1988.
The application complies with .the_ requirements of Ordinance No. 902 concerning
a temporary on -sale liquor license in connection with The Edina Foundation Ball
and will be issued under the license of Interlachen Country Club.
e
o �
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER
From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK
Date: SEPTEMBER 9, 1988
Subject :APPOINT11ENT OF GENERAL /CI
ELECTION JUDGES
Recommendation:
=Agenda Item # VII . B
Consent 0
Information Only ❑
Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA
❑� To Council
Action ❑ Motion
0 Resolution
❑ Ordinance
0
Adoption of the attached resolution appointing election judges for the
General /City Election to be conducted on November 8, 1988.
Info /Background:
Minnesota Election Law 204B.21, Subd. 2 states that election judges for
precincts in a municipality shall be appointed by the governing body of the
municipality.
The names on the attached resolution have been selected lists approved _
by Senate District 42 Chairs pursuant to Statute 204B.21, Subd..l.and,
pursuant to 204B.19, Subd. 5-which requires party balance.
RR- g0T.TTTT0M
BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the following election judges be
appointed to serve on the election boards for the General /City Election be held
on November 8, 1988, and that the City Clerk be and is hereby authorized to
make any substitutions or additions as may be deemed necessary:
(See list attached)
PROPOSED
GENERAL ELECTION JUDGES
November 8, 1988
PRECINCT 1 - Shepherd of Hills
Church - 500
S. Blake Road
1.
Eugenia Williams, Chair
6425
Mendelssohn La. (55343)
938 -5086
2.
Lois Hallquist
305
Grove Place (55343)
938 -5886
3.
Dorie Capetz
6304
Waterman Ave. (55343)
935 -5724
4.
Arlene-Friday
6525
Belmore La. (55343)
933 =4464
5.
Virginia Vonhof
414
Harrison Ave. (55343)
935 -1126
6.
Audrey Krengel
405
Blake Road (55343)
936 -9358
7.
Barbara Anderson
413
Arthur St. (55343)
938 -1160
8.
Celia Nightingale
306
Monroe Ave. (55343)
938 -1621
Shirley De.Leo
609
Waterman Ave.(55343)
938 -3859
10.
'Ruth Amdahl
309
Griffit St. (55343)
935 -8760
PRECINCT 2 - Edina City Hall -
4801 W. 50th
St.
1.
Marjorie Ruedy, Chair
5048
Edenbrook Ave. (36)
922 -2712
2.
Pauline Carroll
4836
Rutledge Ave. (36)
920 -1304
3.
Joan Flumerfelt
5225
Division St. (36)
929 -2114
4.-
Kathleen Saterbak
4505
Oxford Ave. (36)
929 -1287
5.
Suzanne Hirsch
5345
Division St. (36)
925 -1448
6.
Elizabeth Anfinson
5290
Villa Way (36)
929 -2251
7.
Naomi Johnson
5140
Bedford Ave. (36)
929 -0975
8.
Sara Kirkman
4350
Brookside Ct. (36)
926 -0535
9.
Maryann Haemig
5032
Bedford Ave. (36)
929 -1145
i
10.
Dianne Gens
4801
Rutledge Ave. (36)
929 -3176
PRECINCT 3 - Edina Covenant Church
- 4201 W.
50th St.
1.
Linda Smith, Chair
4519
Bruce Ave. (24)
929 -4620
2.
Carol Bucklin
4908
Sunnyside Rd. (24)
922 -2072
3.
Deidre Hedrick
4521
Wooddale Ave. (24)
926 -2428
4.
Marie Goblirsch
4611
Wooddale Ave. (24)
927 -5871
5.
Patricia Dill
4601
Edina Blvd. (24)
922 -4879
6.
Kathleen Stiehm
4520
W. 44th St. (24)
929 -2055
I.
7.
8.
Barbara Bergan
4801
Woodhill Way .(24)
926 -1141
Jane Andrews
4526
Arden Ave. (24)
922 -4236
9.
Christine Morgan
5006
Bruce Ave. (24)
920 -3407
10.
Marie Vorlicky
4514
Drexel Ave. (24)
920 -6026
PRECINCT 4 - Morningside Municipal
Bldg - 4005 Grimes Ave.
1.
Shirley Dibble, Chair
4101
W. 44th St. (24)
926 -4048
2.
Rachel.Schoening
4014
Monterey Ave. (16)
922 -5457
3.
Margery Brothers
4310
Eton P1. (24)
922 -4914
4.
Virginia Courtney
4313
Eton P1. (24)
922 -8523
5.
Marion Cracraft
4227
Alden Dr. (16)
922 -6632
6.
Jeanette Lushine
4166
Monterey Ave. (16)
926 -0576
7.
Joanne Downey
4113
Kipling Ave. (16)
922 -7745
8.
Sharon Hegstrom
4244
Lynn Ave. (16)
922 -7858
9.
Marianne Schoenecker
4218
Scott Terr. (16)
927 -8039
10.
Betty Goughnour
4828
Townes Rd. (24)
922 -1402
PRECINCT 5 - Cahill School (formerly Highlands
School) - 5005 Doncaster
Way
1.
Carol McPheeters, Chair
5409
Doncaster Way (26)
929 -4742
2.
Rosemary McGlynn
4909
Rolling Green Pkwy. (36)
927 -5124
3.
Phyllis Cooper
5500
Mirror Lakes Dr. (36)
925 -1594
4.
Betty Benjamin
5205
Duncraig Road (36)
929 -0941
5.
Mildred Karr
5121
Lake Ridge Road (36)
938 -9283
6.
Susan Little
5423
Highland Dr. (36)
933 -4981
7.
Carol Ledder
5409
Chantrey Rd. (36)
929 -5920
8.
Marjorie Grinnell
6101
Idylwood Dr. (36)
935 -9213
9.
Helen Groth
5300
Ayrshire Blvd. (36)
929 -8485
10.
Diane Kirkland
4 Circle
East (36)
926 -5977
Proposed
General Election Judges ,
November 8, 1988
Page Two
PRECINCT 6 - Countryside School -
5701 Benton Ave.
1.
Jane Bains, Chair
6101 Tracy Ave. (36)
2.
Catherine Swanson
5804 Merold Dr. (36)
3.
Mary Cleaveland
6204 Crest Lane (36)
4.
Barbara Herbers
5801 Stuart Ave. (36)
5.
Susan Zwakman
6109 Ridgeway Rd. (36)
6.
Sherrill Borkon
5913 Sun Road (36)
7.
Marjorie Borrman
5701 Wycliffe Rd. (36)
8.
Gertrude Rocheford
9428 Merold Dr.
9.
Eleanor Westerberg
5816 Amy Dr. (36)
10.
Donna White
6016 Tracy Ave. (36)
PRECINCT 7 - Normandale Church - 6100 Normandale Rd.
I.
Bess Brudelie, Chair _
6412 Gleason Ct. (36)
2.
Helen Peterson
6121 Code Ave. (36)
3.
Naomi Ward
4350 Brookside Ct. (36)
4.,
Kathleen Engquist
6212 Wyman Ave. (36)
5.
Gertrude Snoeyenbos
5125 Valley View Rd. (36)
6.
Eunice Overby
5004 Kent Ave. (36)
7.
Delores Paul
6009 Tingdale Ave. (36)
8.
Avalda Wildermuth
6005 Birchcrest.Dr. (36)
9.
Donna Hunter
5821 Tingdale Ave. (36)
10.
Darlene White
5320 Windsor Ave. (36)
PRECINCT 8 - Southview Junior High
School - 4725 Southview Lane
1.
Jane Moran, Chair
5429 Wooddale Ave. (24)
2.
Myra Hykes
4516 Woodland Rd. (24)
3.
Kathleen Bradford
4600 Concord Terr. (24):
4.
Jeanne Mueller
4510 Golf Terr. (24)
5.
Barbara Raap
4814 Golf Terr. (24)
6.
Monna,Reding
5705 Woodland La. (24)
7.
Lee Strang •.
16 Woodland Rd. (24)
8.
LuJean Swenson
4620 Woodland Rd. W. (24)
9.
Mary Webber
5201 Kellogg Ave. (24)
10.
Barbara Andrews
4512 Drexel Ave. (24)
PRECINCT 9 - Concord School - 5900
Concord Ave.
I.
Aileen Konhauser, Chair
6313 Halifax Ave. (24)
2.
Jacqueline Lindskoog
6112 Kellogg Ave. (24)
3.
Colleen Crew
6215 Halifax Ave. (24)
4..
Helen Connell
4713 School Rd. (24)
5.
Marilyn Halker
6140 Concord Av.e (24)
6.
Patricia Monson
6000 Ashcroft Ave. (24)
7.
Mary Diehl
4704 W. 62nd St. (24)
8.
Gertrude Nulsen
4808 W. 62nd St. (24)
9.
Carolyn Setterberg
6039 Kellogg Ave. (24)
10.
Florence Boughton
5921 Fairfax Ave. (24)
PRECINCT:10 - Creek Valley School
- 6401 Gleason Road
I.
Barbara Erlandson, Chair
6501 Nordic Dr. (35)
2.
Mary Shoquist
6713 Cheyenne Tr. (35)
3.
Shirley Byrne
6717 Gleason Rd. (35)
4.
JoAnn Lonergan
5713 W. 68th St. (35)
5.
Kathryn Rivers
6720 Rosemary Lane (35)
6.
Jeanine Westling
6620 Pawnee Road (35)
7.
Marilyn Devereaux
6704 West Trail (35)
8.
Ruth Haggerty-
6804 Sally Lane (35)
9.
Marguerite Ratelle
6716 Arrowhead Pass (35)
10.
Ilona Kerin
6620 Gleason Rd. (35)
929 -9362
929 -8387
929 -5486
929 -2521
920 -7181
929 -9520
929 -6573
929 -2392
926 -7005
929 -4296
935 -0972
929 -7067
929 -1074
929 -9497
929 -5414
929 -4300
929 -2729
929 -9217
922 -0227
922 -3401
920 -0558
929 -7595
929 -3279
920 -6315
920 -2852
925 -3877
925 -3807
929 -4115
922 -6976
922 -4530
927 -9401
920 -6599
925 -1629
920 -2959
920 -2973
922 -1465
927 -6126
920 -7479
929 -9018
920 -0454
941 -4011
941 -6187
941 -5926
944 -7228
941 -8085
941 -8511
944 -6910
941 -2731
941 -3956
944 -1972
Proposed
General Election Judges
November 8, 1988
Page Three
PRECINCT 11 - Creek valley Church - 6400 Tracy Ave
1.
Geneva Smith, Chair
2. Sharon Lee Smith
6344 Rolf Ave. (35)
941 -2471
- -- 3., Alice Burnell
6708 Hillside Lane (35)
941 -3673
4. Gina Sherman
5416 Creek View Lane 35
( )
941 -5922
5. Carol Melichar!
5200 Tifton Dr. (35)
941 -4328
6. Delphine Duff
6417 Wilryan Ave. (35)
941 -4674
7. Karen Vickman
6716 Cahill Rd. (35)
944 -3938
8: Joy Perunovich
5201 Tifton Dr. (35)
941 -8576
9. Rosemary Sweeney
6805 Brook Dr. (35)
941 -2608
10. Betty Pollitt
6809 Hillside La.
944 -1310
6412 Limerick La. (35)
941 -1073
PRECINCT 12 - Christ Church -
6901 Nor mandale Rd.
1. Ardis Wexler, Chair
2. Shirley Bjerkin
4913 Larkspur La. (35)
925 -2097
3. Carol Hite
Ellsworth
4405 Ellsworth Dr. (35)
. (
922-0406
4.. Mary Scholz
4720 La. )
927 -4885
5. Doris Marchuk
4512 Gilford Dr. (35)
920 -2152
6. JoAnne Chayer
4600 Gilford Dr. (35)
922 -4360
7. Marjorie Erstad
4812 Wilford Way (35)
922 -2015
8. Lois Denker
4401 Dunberry La. (35)
929 -2527
9. Wynn Meeker
4501 Gilford Dr. (35)
925 -2790
10... Jan Burnett
4800. Wilford Way (35)
922 -5679
4516 Gilford Dr. (35)
920 -6069
PRECINCT 13 - Cornelia School -
7000 Cornelia Dr.
1. Doris Peterson, Chair
2. Amy Woods
4120 Parklawn.Ave. (35)
835 -7951
3. June Schmidt
7200 Cahill Rd. (35)
944 -8208
4. Irene O'Neill
7005 Bristol Blvd. (35)
922 -1183
5. Kathleen Garnatz
4350 Parklawn Ave. (35)
835 -4954
6. Margaret Polta
4120 Parklawn Ave. (35)
831 -1528
7. Elaine Tollefsrud
4480 Parklawn Ave. (35)
831 -7263
8. Pauline Mertes
7400 Ave. (35)
835 -7710
9.. Ann Matula
Cornelia
7133 Cornelia Dr. (35)
920 -5898
10. Hattie Jackson
4145 Parklawn Ave. (35)
830 -1069
7333 Gallagher Dr. #329 (35)
835 -7483
PRECINCT 14 - St. Peters Church
1.
- 5421 France Ave. S.
Mary Jane Platt, Chair
2. Joyce Hanson
5504 Beard Ave. S. (10)
926 -8447
3. Donna Brastad
5829 Drew Ave. S. (10)
926 -8856
4. Maxine Hatzung
5701 Chowen Ave. S. (TO
(1 )
926 -3468
5. Anne Frances.
6301 Ewing Ave. S. (lo)
929 -3289
6. Lael Pederson
4909 B ywood West (36).
925 -4510
7. Esther Olson
5411 Abbott Ave. S. (10)
927 -5221
8, Louise Carlson
5441 York Ave. S. (10)
926 -1006
9. Mary
3700 Chowen Curve (10)
926 -6253
10. Geraldine dine Sj Sjo blom
5917 Drew Ave. S. (10)
922 -8579
5904 York Ave. S. (10)
922 -6185
PRECINCT 15 - Valle View Junior
1. Katherine Luikens, Chair
Hi h School - 6750 Valley View Rd
2. Jean Hare
7310 Claredon Dr. (35)
944 -1016
3. Carol Hanson
6917 Mark Terrace Dr. (35)
944 -3877
4. .Jean Teasley
5809 Chapel Dr. (35)
944 -2759
5. Marjorie Johnson
7004 Tupa Dr. (35)
7115
941 -3984
6. Carolyn Klus
Tupa Dr. (25)
7017
944 -5102
7. Maxine Wallin
Valley View Rd. (15)
7022
941 -5195
8. Merry Krueger
Tupa Cir. (35)
7306 Claredon
941 -4628
9. Elna Kassen
10.
Dr. (35)
7607 Stonewood Ct. (35)
941 -6791
Bernie Schaeffler
7008 Mark Terrace Dr. 35
( )
941 -3667
942 -9703
Proposed
General Election Judges
November 8, 1988
Page Four
PRECINCT 16 - Southdale Hennepin
Library - 7001 York Ave. S -:
1.
Mary McDonald, Chair
6929 Southdale Rd. (35)
926 -7860
2.
Nathalie Person
4520 Laguna Dr. (35)'
922 -4547
3.
Patricia Halvorson
6700 Xerxes Ave. S. (23)
869 -0366
4.
5.
Bonnie Bjerken
6524 West Shore Dr. (35)
926 -6998
Bernadine Chapman
4860 W. 64th St. (35)
922 -1370
6.
Donna Montgomery
6824 Oaklawn Ave. (35)
920 -9044
7.
8.
Kathryn Larson.
6608 'Oaklawn Ave. (35)
925 -4476
9.
Mary Zotalis
6455.York Ave. S. (35).
925 -9537
10.
Caroline Scott
6809 Point Dr. (35)
927 -0627
Marlys Chase
6933 Southdale Rd. (35)
926 -8193
PRECINCT 17 - Yorktown Continental Apartments - 7151 York Ave. S.
1.
Lorna Livingston, Chair
5920 Wooddale Ave. (24)
926 -5322
2.
3.
Jean McDermid
5116 Mirror Lakes Dr. (36)
929 -8859
4.
Marie Bachman
:Louise
7201 York Ave. S. (35)
831 -6452
Jackson
6016 Zenith Ave. S. (10)
927 -8279"
5!_
Florence Tretten
5145 Bedford Ave. (36)
929 -8082
6..
7.
Mary Ryan
5508 Goya Lane (36)
926 -5139
8.
Joyce Koets
Yvonne Ford
5005 Clover Ridge (36)
929 -4070
9.
Virginia McWethy
6308 Barrie Rd., 2D (35)
922 -6606
10.
Katherine Saunders
6843 Langford Dr. (36)
6304
931 -0315
York Ave. S. (35)
925 -9750
PRECINCT 18 - Edinboro ugh Park -
7700 York Ave. S.
I.
2.
Jean Erdall, Chair
6101 Abbott Ave. S. (10)
922 -9202
Selma Shelton
7200 York Ave. S. (35)
831 -8863
3.
Patricia MacCornack
5300 Malibu Dr. (36)
933 -0335
4.
JOAnn Streed
7350 York Ave. S. (35)
835 -9019
5.
Betty Lou Petersen
4313 Cornelia Cir. (35)
926 -9523
6.
Doris Blake
6701 Southdale Rd. (35)
920 -1470
7.
8.
Phyllis Fuller
5660 Woodcrest Dr. (24)
926 -2367
9.
Myrtle Grette
5709 York Ave. S. (10)
926 -6373
10.
Kathleen Tierney
Audrey McCarthy
5016 Oxford Ave. (36)
929 -0948
6450 York Ave. S. (35)
929 -8126
PRECINCT 19 - Chapel Hills Church
- 6512 Vernon Ave
I.
Charlotte Scanlon, Chair
6144 Arctic Way (36)
938 -3245
2.
3.
Jean Altman
Connie Bing
6151 Arctic Way (36)
935 -4803
4.
Jeannene Wurst
6105 Lincoln Dr. (36)
938 -1069
5.
Alyce Hamilton
6205 Knoll Dr. (36)
935 -9923
6..
Ardis,Dorsey
6913 Langford Dr. (36)
935 -1123
7.
Erthel Johnson
Johns
6624 Parkwood Rd. (36)
933 -2649
8.
Luverne Graham
6650 Vernon Ave. (36)
.935 -0656
9.
Linda Anderson
6075 Lincoln Dr. (36)
935 -7515
10.
Anne LaBovsky
5717 Camelback Dr. (36)
933 -1765
6075 Lincoln Dr. (36)
933 -1477
PRECINCT 20 - Wooddale Montessori
School (formerly Cahill School) - 5601
W. 70th St.
1.
Patricia Olander, Chair
7001 Lee Valley Circle (35)
944 -2185
2.
Anita Delegard
7209 Lanham La. (35)
941 -5056
3.
4.
Zelma" Gray
Evelyn Herkal
5530 Village Dr. 135)
944 -5348
5.
Harriet Koch
5501 Dewey Hill Rd. (35)
829 -1956
6.
Sheila Luff
5501 Dewey Hill Rd. (35)
944 -0271
7.
Mary Vanek
7150 Cahill Rd. (35)
941 -2367
8.'
Kate Wyers
7520 Cahill Rd. (35)
941 -9353
9.
Charlotte Burns
7250 Lewis.Ridge Pkwy.(35)
944 -3544
10.
Lois Devitt
5820 Dewey Hill Rd. (35)
941 -4108
5601 Dewey Hill Rd. (35)
941 -3322
A.
O e �°
Cn
v -by
\�RPOMt�O/
1888 '
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
MEMBERS
From: KENNETH ROSLAND
CITY MANAGER
Date: SEPTEMBER 12, 1988
Subject:
1988 IAFF CONTRACT
SETTLEMENT PROPOSAL
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
VII. c
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
0
To Council
Action
K
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Approval of the proposed settlement with IAFF 1275 - Contract 1988.
Info /Background:
The attached memorandum explains contract negotiations with IAFF 1275
(Firefighters).
M E M 0 R A N D U M.
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: KENNETH ROSLAND
SUBJECT: SETTLEMENT IAFF 1275 CONTRACT 1988
DATE: SEPTEMBER 12, 1988
For more than six months I have been involved in contract negotiations
with IAFF 1275 (Firefighters). I am pleased to bring to you the
following tentative agreement.
1. WAGES - 1988
Increase the wages of all employees by 4 %. Additionally, acid 1% to
the wages of the employees performing paramedic and inspector
duties. The additional 1% is a comparable worth adjustment
consistent with the City's comparable worth program.
Acting officer pay would become 20% of top firefighter base.
In the past, the acting officer rate was based on Assistant Chief
pay. After our reorganization and subsequent arbitration, this was
no longer a viable means to calculate acting officer pay.
2. INSURANCE
The City would increase the employer contribution $10.00/month.
3. SEVERANCE PAY
Reduce the years of service necessary to qualify for full severance
pay from twenty (20) years of service to fifteen (15) years of
service.
Because of the savings in wages paid to new employees, the City
will not be increasing costs to the Fire Department by providing
for an "early out ". Additionally, the City could also reduce its
Worker's Compensation Liability by encouraging employees to leave
City employment at a younger age.
The cost of this proposed settlement is within the budget for 1988 and I
recommend that you approve it.
O e " tai
VJ
v � -bO
• �N�bRPOMt�O •
�BeB
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: MAYOR AND - COUNCIL .;
MEMBERS
From: KENNETH ROSLAND
Date: SEPTEMBER 12, 1988
Subject:
SETTLEMENT FOR 1988 -
1989 WITH LOCAL 49
(PUBLIC WORKS)
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
VII . D
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
0
To Council
Action
0
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Approval of the proposed settlement for 1988 -89 with Local 49
(Public Works)
Info /Background:
See memorandum attached.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: KENNETH ROSLAND
SUBJECT: SETTLEMENT FOR 1988 - 1989 WITH LOCAL 49 (PUBLIC WORKS)
DATE: SEPTEMBER 12, 1988
As you know,' the City of Edina is a participant in The Joint Bargaining
between MAMA and Local 49 of the Operating Engineers who represent our
Public Works and Park Maintenance. Employees. The 1988 -1989 MAMA -Local
49 Joint Bargaining Agreement provided for reopened negotiations on the
issues of wage rates and insurance for 1988 and 1989.
After months of negotiations and - mediation, the MAMA and Local 49
bargaining committees reached a tentative agreement. The Agreement with
the use of lower base wage and lump sum payments is, in the opinion of
the MAMA negotiating committee, consistent with MAMA's efforts to comply
with the State's 1984 Comparable Worth Law. The cost of the settlement
for 1988 is within the 1988 budget. The Union has.ratified the
Agreement.
The Agreement is as follows:
1. WAGE RATES FOR 1988
All jobs, except the rate(s) for the job classification of
Maintenance 1, listed in each City's wage appendix should be raised
by 1 1 /2% effective the first payroll period of 1988, and all
employees should be paid a lump sum payment for all hours the
employees would be normally scheduled to work (excluding all
overtime hours) equal to 2 % -2 1/.2% of the employees base pay rate.
I am recommending the lump sum payment of 2 112% to be consistent
with the 4% increases the City has budgeted for its other
employees.
2. WAGE RATES FOR 1989
The base rate for all classifications should be raised by 1 1/2%
effective the first payroll period in January, 1989, and all
employees should be paid a lump sum payment for all hours the
employees would be normally scheduled to work (excluding overtime)
equal to 2% - 2 1/2% of the employees base rate. I am recommending
that if you approve a 4% for all employees for 1989, we would pay a
2 1/2% lump -stun payment to be ,consistent with that 4% increase.
3. INSURANCE
The City will pay $185.00 toward Health and Life Insurance benefits
for the calendar years 1988 -1989. By mutual agreement, employees
may use $15.00 of the per -month per employee of health insurance
dollars for dental insurance for-all-unit employees.
Again, I reiterate, the cost of this agreement is within budget and I
recommend we accept this settlement.
o e7, ';,
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER
From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK
Date: SEPTEMBER 9, 1988
Subject: PETITION FOR SIDEWALK
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # VIII.A
Consent []
Information Only 7
Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA
❑] To Council
Action 7 Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
That the petition for. construction of sidewalk on west side of Xerxes Avenue
between 60th and 62nd. Streets be referred to the Engineering Department for
processing.per normal procedure.
Info /Background:
The attached petition was received on August 16, 1988 from residents between
60th and 62nd Streets on the west side of Xerxes Avenue requesting that a
concrete sidewalk be constructed in front of the homes from house number 6000
to house number 6132.
PETITION TO THE CITY OF EDINA
The residents between 60th street and 62nd street on the west side of Xerxes Avenue petition the
City of Edina to construct a concrete sidewalk in front of the homes from house number 6000 to
house number
Many of us have resided here for over 30 years. During this time, we endured repairing our lawns
each spring from the damage done by the salt and sand used on Xerxes Ave. which is a county road and
a snow emergency route. The amount of salt used in recent years makes the growing.of grass along
the curb an impossibility. The resulting unsightly weeds reduces property values considerably.
Furthermore, there are 2 bus stops in this two block section and nowhere for people to alight when
snowbanks are deep. Also, many people use the west side of Xerxes for walking which creates a
safety problem in the winter.
City Engineer Fran Hoffman informed us that Edina has State gasoline tax funds available for this
sidewalk project on Xerxes, which is a county road. Therefore, the residents petition to have this
sidewalk constructed by the City of Edina at no cost to the residents.
We want the sidewalk to begin at the curb. A strip of grass between the curb and the sidewalk would
leave us with the same old salt problem.
FJ
6032 ELnie L. Benjamin �'� /i,
6104 F3_ nitmnn - .;.. /0 17-Y--- - ,pl— //— &-7 (7,
VEX-
511 �/ S' e
6108 ARAMMEAMwd 1CG� U�z�a' JV 'i�� ' �� ,:u���. �� ,,; b /r,
/ - IF A .y
l Okk -P. �WO,60&
Q
t �r
O`,4 A j, .
o e
J
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: KEN ROSLAND,- MANAGER
MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK
Date: SEPTEMBER 9, 1988
Subject: PETITION FOR RESTORATION
OF STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # V7TT.B
Consent
Information Only
Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA
To Council
Action ❑ Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
That the petition for restoration of storm drainage system in the area of
64th and York Avenue be referred to the Engineering Department for review
and recommendation.
Info /Background:
The-attached petition was received on August'12, 1988 from Chateau Edina
Association, 6415 York Avenue So. signed by 74 home owners in the area of
64th and York requesting restoration of the storm drainage system and.
reapportioning of drainage water out from a three block area in Richfield.
Chateau Edina Edina Association
-" 6415 York Avenue S.
Edina, MN 55435
August 12, 1988
Mr. Fran Hoffman
Director of Public Works & Engineering
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mr. Hoffman:
We have seventy -four (74) signatures of home owners in our area
at 64th and York who have signed the enclosed petition relative
to the need of restoration of our storm drainage system. The
apartment complex at 6455 York contains 44 units. These people
are supportive of the petition. However, as renters.they are
not property owners and therefore cannot sign this petition.
The condo owners-at 6400 York have not suffered the serious
damage the rest of us have, but they are giving community support
in our effort to.have the problems rectified.
In the past fourteen years we have had three major floods here at
64th & york. One flood was 8/76, next 9/77 and of course 7/87.
In 1977, approximately 9 -10 cars were lost at 6415 York. In July,
1987, in addition to loss of a car in the garage and two cars in
the parking lot, we also lost all of our party room furniture, .
two washing machines, two driers, water softener; we had severe
damage to our furnace and to our pool, and a considerable amount
of personal property loss from our lockers. 25 to 30 cars were
totaled in the garages at 6455 York. At least five homes in the
6300 and 6400 block on Xerxes suffered extensive damage also, .
including cars, boats and personal property in the lower level of
their homes.
We hope this petition assists the City of Edina on focusing
promptly on our critical problems in this area. Our property
damage has been extensive, and the resell value of our condos and
homes has been badly devalued. We strongly urge you to place the
64th and York area on the top of.your priority list for prompt
planning and prompt action to correct this serious problem.
Yours truly,
r
Franc4s J. Link
6415 York Avenue S.
Edina, MN 55435
t-91, the umm-sipwi, are petitionisw the city or ndinap relative
to the ron-stor-aZion of the storm draiwWo system at 64th and York*
i"'As -zrouldl, It arpewm-v necosaltate the reapportioning of dr&JUave
water -a thr*vg block area in Tdchfl"Idt whieb r-Twently, am. pties Into
c'u —r; fr-il-n—a a tom. Z; � c�y �p I e a t a j
nere"iin; the vise of the
prop rv%rvin- c�'Ah and York.
The restitution of this stem dral mmre lit aritio*1 for those of
us livin--7, 4,n this area*
6zze,p
same Address
�t�LAt-)6e � bin s
..........
AWAS
zoo
2/
1' -P
We, the undersigned, are petitioning the City of Edina, relative
to the restoration of the stony drainage system at 64th and York.
This would, it appears, necessitate the reapportioning of drainage
water out--from a three block area in Richfield, which presently empties into
our drainage system. Secondly, it would indicate increasing the size of the
punp serving 64th and York.
The restitution of this storm drainage is critical for those of
us living in this area.
Name Address
4
C V�
�
`l��prk Al 13
l:'
/j
I .%
1,70s -,via rZd9r-.d9n(,d., -MM Patitl r, the -tr of Sellm lative to the
anin C4
restoratlan of the storm drainne 3"tM at 64th and York.
Thiz--vmadj, It appeazz,v, aacmstdUte the rmpportienlM of drainw,*
vaUr out Pmm a thm-e block area in f.-iCbMaId# witdch r-resently empties Into
our drainage systm, Secomayg It would ladUate Irare"IM the size of VA
pmp earving 64th and Tork.
Tho nntltution of this atom drainag e
,a is critical fbd- of os
IlViM in this al'ea*
ZIA �
0 Ogmva
0001, 11017K/A_97
0
CIL
. r
We, the undersigned, are petitioning the City of 5dina relative to the
restoration of the storm drainage system at 64th and York.
This-would, it appears,, necessitate the reapportioning of drainage
'water out from a three block area in Lichfield, which presently empties into
our drainage system. Secondly, it would indicate increasing the size or" the
pump serving 64th and York.
The restitution of this storm drainage is critical for those of us
living in this area.
Name Address 1
A.
o� e
>4 En
•'N�RPOM���/
�aee
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis Hoffman
City Engineer
Date: 8 September, 1988
Subject: Minnesota Drive
Utilities:
Water Main 365
Storm Sewer 186
Sanitary Sewer 379
Authorize Project
& Bids
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
Ix. A.
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
E
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Approve projects for utilities in Minnesota Drive from France Avenue to
Edinborough Way. Authorize bids for above projects.
Info /Background:
These projects are part of the Hedberg project. The estimated cost for the
three utility projects is $139,547.02. They are proposed to be assessed
against Phase I development of the Hedberg project. The total Phase I square
footage is 2,452,428 square feet. The estimated cost per square foot would
be 5.69 cents. (See estimates of cost.)
ESTIMATE OF COST
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
WATER MAIN
IMPROVEMENT NO. P -WM -365
LOCATION:
Minnesota Drive from France Ave to Edinborough Way
HEARING DATE: Sevtember 12, 1988
ESTIMATED
COST OF CONSTRUCTION: $ 45.291.68
(Includes
Engineering, Clerical &Interest)
UNIT
QUANTITY
UNIT DESCRIPTION
PRICE
TOTAL
1,245
LF 10" D..I.P. W.M. Cl. 54
18.00
22,410.00
40
LF 6" D.I.P. W.M. Cl. 52
14.00
560.00
3
EA 10" 1/32 Bends
160.00
480.00
2
EA 10 ". 1/16 Bends
160.00
320.00
2'
EA 10x6 Tees
220.00
440.00
2
EA 10x10 Tees
270.00
540.00
1
EA 10x10 Cross
350.00.
350.00
4
EA 10" Plugs
50.00
200.00
6
EA 10" Gate Valves and Manholes
1,500.00
9,000.00
2
EA Std. Fire Hydrants with 6" „Gate 1,300.00
2,600.00
Valve Box & Cover
2
EA 10” Sleeves
100.00
200.00
Subtotal:
$37,100.00
Add.10% Engineering,
2% Clerical:
4,452.00
$41,552.00
Capitalized
Interest 9%:
3.739.68
Estimated Total Cost of Construction:
$45,291.68
Prepared By
Checked
By
Francis J. Hof an, P .
Director
of Public Works
and City
Engineer
ESTIMATE OF COST
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
STORM SEWER
IMPROVEMENT NO. P- STS -186 -
LOCATION: Minnesota. Drive from France -Ave to Edinborough Way
HEARING DATE: September 12, 1988
ESTIMATED COST OF CONSTRUCTION: $ 70.874.76
(Includes Engineering, Clerical & Interest)
UNIT
_QUANTITY
UNIT
DESCRIPTION
PRICE
TOTAL
1
EA
Remove Manhole
200.00
200.00
2
EA
Remove Catch Basins
150.00
300.00
48
LF
44" Span L..R.B. R.C.P. 0 -8' Depth
330.00
15,840.00
Cl. III
20
LF
44" Span R.C.P. 0 -8' Depth Cl. III 110.00
2,200.00
(With Plug)
324
LF
12" R.C.P. Cl. V 0 -8' Depth
14.00
4,536.00
305
LF
15" R.C.P. Cl. III 0 -8' Depth
18.00
5,490.00
535
LF
18" R.C.P. Cl. III 0 -8' Depth
20.00
10,700.00
9
EA
Std. CB's 0 -8' Depth with R3250A
1,000.00
9,000.00
Frame and Casting
1
EA
Std. Manhole 0 -8' Depth with
1,000.00
1,000.00
R1728 Frame & Casting (No Holes)
2
EA
84" Dia. Manholes with Flat Slap
3,650.00
7,300.00
with R1728 Frame & Cover 0 -8'
Depth
1
EA
15." Bulkhead
200.00
200.00
15
TONS
Mn /DOT 2331 with Oil for Patching
50.00
750.00
54
TONS
Cl. 2 Gravel 6" Thick Compacted
10.00
540.00
Subtotal:
$58,056.00
Estimate of Cost
Storm Sewer
Improvement No. P- STS -186
Minnesota Drive from France Ave.
to Edinborough Way
Page Two
Prepared By
Checked By
Add 10% Engineering, 2% Clerical: 6.966.72
$65,022.72
Capitalized Interest 9%: 5,852.04
Estimated Total Cost of Construction: $70,874.76
Francis J. Hoffman P.E.
Director of Public-Works
and City Engineer
ESTIMATE OF COST
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
SANITARY SEWER
IMPROVEMENT NO. P- SS -37 -9
LOCATION: Minnesota Drive from France Ave to Edinborough Way
HEARING DATE: September 12, 1988
ESTIMATED COST OF CONSTRUCTION: $ 23.380.58
(Includes Engineering, Clerical & Interest)
Subtotal: $19,151.85
Add 10% Engineering, 2% Clerical: 2.298.22.
$21,450.07
Capitalized Interest 9 %: 1.930.51
Estimated Total Cost of Construction: $23,380.58
Prepared By
Checked By
-
Francis J. Hoff n, P' .
Director of P lic Works
and City Engineer
UNIT
QUANTITY
UNIT
DESCRIPTION
PRICE
TOTAL
585
LF
8" V.C.P. 12 -14' Depth
14.00
$ 8,190.00
245
LF
8" V.C.P. 14 -161 Depth
16.00
3,920.00
150
LF
10" V.C.P. 12 -14' Depth
16.00
2,400.00
3
EA
Std. 0 -8' Manholes (With Frame
1,000.00
3,000.00
-
& Cover)
18.61
V/F
Extra Wall Manhole
85.00
1,581.85
4
EA
8" V.C. Plugs
15.00
60.00
Subtotal: $19,151.85
Add 10% Engineering, 2% Clerical: 2.298.22.
$21,450.07
Capitalized Interest 9 %: 1.930.51
Estimated Total Cost of Construction: $23,380.58
Prepared By
Checked By
-
Francis J. Hoff n, P' .
Director of P lic Works
and City Engineer
A.
o e
��, ch
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
1888
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis Hoffman � )�
City Engineer .1 l
Date: 8 September, 1988
Subject: 100% Petition to
Install Grading,
Gravelling, Water Main, Sanitary
Sewer and Storm Sewer to Service
Landmark Addition.
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # —IX. B.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA
F] To Council
Action ❑ Motion
0 Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Approve projects identified as Sanitary Sewer No. 377, Water Main No. 363,
Grading and Gravelling No. BA -281, and Storm Sewer No. 185. These improve-
ments will be on Malibu Drive to approximately 710 feet southeasterly from
Lincoln Drive (see attached map and estimates).
Info /Background:
The Landmark Addition was approved earlier this year. The Developer's Agree-
ment has the developer's petitioning the City to construct the sanitary sewer,
water main, and grade and gravel Malibu Drive adjacent to the site. The project
costs will be assessed back to the developer on a three year basis. Additionally,
Van Valkenburg park is adjacent to the roadway, we would propose that the portion
of the road costs that would be assessed the abutting parkland be over a ten year
period. As such,.we would recommend approval of the projects with authorization
that bids be taken.
r..
KEY
Portion of Malibu Drive to
be Constructed
32
N88 049.53W r � • �,;;
I 30666 -- 4'9f °S' : e - ;SS 67 T
C r
E
CD
Na
1z N
V l
3 �
Z
W /11 !6 Q' S 59 v Cr
r. S7143 Z_ _ .j'' ,4
W 03 213. l2 �. .r
I
o o N87 °51.16 •E o
co
Qj
,EAST �` j tB i v
4RVEV
L�_ HL4
9� G�
/_700
ZZ
Al
l' e
� o G� � 1 � UO� , �•� � .mac a V
- • £as,' 4!8 68 63 Z7 Q. o a •*
418 68 - 2
N89 °58 •W
QP
a1 a
N w o\ v
2 1,Q
W c w
445.02
-<III 94 lot
s •1. —r
2
(59) q�`s✓ati� s' - �
'o,�,
2��`'�: :t` ,
--
!s5 7c
ESTIMATE OF COST
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
GRADING. GRAVELING. CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER
AND BITUMINOUS SURFACING
- -- IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -281
LOCATION: Malibu Drive from Lincoln Drive to 655' Southeasterly
HEARING DATE: September 12, 1988
ESTIMATED COST OF CONSTRUCTION: $29.217.87
(Includes Engineering, Clerical & Interest)
NO. OF ASSESSABLE.FEET: 1.160.54
ESTIMATED COST PER LOT: $25.18
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT:
LOT
BLOCK ADDITION
PINS NO.
FOOTAGE
Outlot C
Parkwood Knolls 20th
30- 117 -21 -32 -0008
605.37
Outlot E
Parkwood Knolls 20th
30- 117 -21 -32 -0010
555.17
UNIT
QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION PRICE TOTAL
2,000
CY
Excavation V.M.
$ 4.50
$ 9,000.00
1,886
TONS
C15A Gravel
6.50
12,259.00
20
LF
Remove Concrete Curb
& Gutter 10.00
200.00 .
4
EA
Clear, Grub & Remove
Trees 150.00
600.00
4" & Larger
7
EA
Adjust Manholes
100.00
700.00
10
EA
Adjust Catch Basins
100.00
1,000.00
Subtotal:
$ 23,759.00
Add 10% Engineering & 2% Clerical: 2.851.08
$ 26,610.08
Add 9.8% Capitalized Interest: 2.607.79
Estimated Total Cost of Construction: $ 29,217.87
Prepared By
Checked By
ancis J. Hof fm P
Director of Pu is Works
and City Engineer
ESTIMATE OF COST
CITY OF EDINA. MINNESOTA
WATER MAIN
IMPROVEMENT NO. P -WM -363
LOCATION: Malibu Drive from Lincoln Drive to 710' Southeasterly
HEARING DATE: September 12. 1988
ESTIMATED COST OF CONSTRUCTION: $51.014.13
(Includes Engineering, Clerical & Interest)
ESTIMATED ASSESSABLE COST OF CONSTRUCTION $28.868.62
NO. OF ASSESSABLE LOTS: 5
ESTIMATED COST PER ASSESSABLE LOT: $5.773.72
AMOUNT TO BE FINANCED BY UTILITY FUND FOR OVERSIZING MAIN: $22.145.51
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT:
LOT BLOCK ADDITION PINS NO.' NO. LOTS
Outlot C Parkwood Knolls 20th 30- 117 -21 -32 -0008 5
UNIT
QUANTITY
UNIT
DESCRIPTION
PRICE
TOTAL
1
EA
16" Plug MJ
209.00
209.00
1
EA
16" Butterfly Valve with
4,600.00
4,600.00
Manhole MJ
20
LF
16" D.I.P. Water Main MJ
50.00
1,000.00
710
LF
12" D.I.P. Water Main Cl. 52
30.00
21,300.00
15
EA
6" D.I.P. Water Main Cl. 52
20.00
300.00
1
EA
12x12 Pressure Tap (with
3,200.00.
3,200.00
Manhole)
2
EA
12" 1/32 Bends
260.00
520.00
2
EA
12" 1/16 Bends
260.00
520.00
1
EA
12" Gate Valve with Manhole
2,130.00
2,130.00
1
EA
12x6 Tee
360.00
360:00
1
EA
Std. Hydrant with 6" Gate
1,200.00
1,200.00
Valve Box & Cover
10
EA
1" Corporation Taps and Stops
50.00
500.00
10
EA
1" Curb Boxes and Stops
90.00
900.00
1
EA
12" Plug Tie MJ
92.00
92.00.
2
EA
12" Retainer Glands
96.00
192.00
40
LF
3/8" Tie Rod
2.00
80.00
Estimate of Cost
Water Main
Improvement No. P -WM -363
Malibu Drive from Lincoln
Drive to 710' Southeasterly
UNIT
QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION PRICE TOTAL
280 LF 1 ".Copper for Services 12.00 3,360.00
1 EA 12x12 Tee with 16" Bell 1,020.00 1,020.00
Reducer
Prepared By:� 'y
�z.
Checked By:
Subtotal: $41,483.00
Add 10% Engineering & 2% Clerical: 4,977.96
$46,460.96
Add 9.8% Capitalized Interest: 4.553.17
Estimated Total Cost of Construction: $51,014.13
ancis J. Hoff n, P. .
Director of Public Works & City Engineer
ESTIMATE OF COST
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
SANITARY SEWER
IMPROVEMENT NO. P -SS -377
Location: Malibu Drive from Lincoln Drive to 710' Southeasterly
Hearing Date: September 12, 1988
Estimated Total Cost of Construction: $35,663.65
.(Includes Engineering, Clerical & Interest)
No. of Assessable Lots: 5
Estimated Cost Per Assessable Lot: $7,132.73
Assessment District:
Lot Block
Outlot C
Addition
Parkwood Knolls 20th
Pins No. No. Lots
30- 117 -21 -32 -0008 5
Subtotal $29,000.50
Add 10% Engineering & 27 Clerical $ 3,480.06
$32,480.56
Add 9.87 Capitalized Interest $ 3,183.09
Estimated Total Cost of Construction $35,663.65
Prepared By
Checked By
Francis J. Ho man,
Director of Public`Works
and City Manager
Unit
Quantity
Material
Price
Total
48
L/F
8" V.C.P. 8 -10' Depth
14.00
$ 672.00
532
L/F
8 ".V.C.P. 10 -12' Depth
16.00
8,512.00
127
L/F
8" V.C.P. 12-14' Depth..
20.00
2,540.00
7
Each
Std. 0 -8' Manholes (with frame and cover)
11000.00
7,000.00
20.9
L/F
Extra Wall Manhole
85.00
1,776.50
4
Each
8x4 Wyes
50.00
200.00
300
L/F
4" C.1. Extra Strength for Services
12.00
3,600:00
6
Each
Service Taps on Existing Line
200.00
1,200.00
140
S/Y
4" Bituminous Repiar Minn. D.O.T. 2341 with 1'
C15A Base
25.00
3,500.00
Subtotal $29,000.50
Add 10% Engineering & 27 Clerical $ 3,480.06
$32,480.56
Add 9.87 Capitalized Interest $ 3,183.09
Estimated Total Cost of Construction $35,663.65
Prepared By
Checked By
Francis J. Ho man,
Director of Public`Works
and City Manager
ESTIMATE OF COST
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
STORM SEWER
IMPROVEMENT N0: P- STS -185
Location: Malibu Drive from Lincoln Drive to 290' Southeast
Hearing Date: September 12, 1988
Estimated Total Cost of Construction: $17,733.75
(Includes Engineering, Clerical & Interest)
No. of Assessable S /F: 140,300
Estimated Cost Per Assessable Foot:. $0.126
Assessment District:
Lot Block, Addition Pins No. S/F
Outlot E Parkwood Knolls 20th 30- 117 -21 -31 -0010 87,453
Tract A R.L.S..1503 30- 117 -21 -31 -0011 52,847.
Prepared By
Checked By �Y
0
Francis J. Hoffman, P./J�'i.,
Director of Public Works
and City Engineer
Unit
Quantity
Material
Price
Total
83.3
L/F 18" R.C.P. 0 -8' Depth
25.00
$ 2,082.50
107
L/F 15" R.C.P. 0 -8' Depth
20.00
2,140.00
190
L/F 12" R.C.P. 0 -8' Depth
19.00
3,610.00
23.3
L/F 12" R.C.P. Removed
10.00
233-.00
6
Each Type "C" Catch Basins 0 -6' Depth with
Frame & Casting
950.00
5,700.00
2
F &1 Type "C" Frames & Covers
200.00
400.00
3
L/F Extra Depth Catch Basins
85.00
255.00
Subtotal
$14,420.50
Add 10% Engineering& 2% Clerical
$ 1;730.46
$16,150.96
Add.-9.8% Capitalized Interest
$ 1,582.79
Estimated Total Cost of Construction
$17,733.75
Prepared By
Checked By �Y
0
Francis J. Hoffman, P./J�'i.,
Director of Public Works
and City Engineer
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT
FOR SOUTH EDINA DEVELOPMENT ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "SOUTH EDINA DEVELOPMENT ADDITION ", platted by Kenneth M.
Anderson, Personal Representative of the Estate of Fred W. Hedberg, deceased
and unmarried, John W. Hedberg and Jean Hedberg, husband and wife, Michael T.
DeCourcy, also known as Michael DeCourcy, and-Merry L. DeCourcy, husband and
wife, Michael T. DeCourcy as attorney in fact for Donald DeCourcy and Catherine L.
DeCourcy, also known as Catherine DeCourcy, husband and wife, Elizabeth T. DeCourcy,
an unremarried widow, Cecilia Talbot, a single person, and Bertram Talbot, a
single person, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of
September 12, 1988, be and is hereby granted final plat approval.
ADOPTED this 12th day of September, 1988.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and
correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted.by.the Edina City Council at its
regular meeting of September 12, 1988 and as recorded in the Minutes of said
regular meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 3rd day of October, 1988.
City Clerk
;w QIIIIIIIIII.:. ;AW
Aft
.j-
..
IM
1
NOV!
MMIAM701:
LIMi
f= �_ I ■ p■ --_
DBERG SITE . PAF
I TI- FAMILY HOUS
Am WAII1,.A:gAmC=Tj2[0l:
1 �M
�1
�v_r7 ��i.•.w-
1111 ■■
Ilnl
CLvv IJA
vit
J.
7 1 4m
A
m 0.7t. a
Lm
■ =
I
:1.18HI
mr .11P
. ma,
, lj=A
AM
1111111
1111111
n
I im
:f
`.ANI
ak
f
_
�i.if. -l.i•
r
•
f
I im
:f
I._
' 1M V
s; .
■
�j
11
M 11 1
EN
OL
In 1111
Im -M
1 _
-2
31
7�
-■ ■Iii ■!� ' � `
■�.,■■N
■■■f�
urxm
4 ;_
11■■11 171 1��,1 I1 ■ ■II wit
�� � ■ ■11 Ir�ll Ir•11 11 ■/t �Il
■■ ■L... � !�� I�AI 1/1x1 I�. � �g
. ■■■ ■ Li1W■ ■111 111 ■ ■`uYY ■■■1
a..: ■M ■M■EiM■■ niyi e. -si ■ ■E■ ■M ■1
_ _ ■ \ ■� ■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■a ■ ■1
Lm MOVIE SEE
R9 II ■■■MMES■■■ ■■■■■■EI
♦ linii ONE
Ell •■■■el C
♦
■■IIMI
:,:,A$,=
0-1,0 �klv
:::,
a
_ � --- ,__
r. .
... •.
- � � 'c_ ,-
�'i
i
_: ,
' z
�... i
j
'_J
__Y.1
i V
i
r —�
i
:
". W.
An
ME
WEIRP ONE
IM
ONE
94 mil
,mom
mm
mm
Itl 1988 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK_-N0. -DATE --- - AMOUNT — - VENDOR
250.00 !
,256M85 08/22/88 29.53 MN. WANNER
e56M85 06/e3/88 16.00 MN. WANNER
I : - - - -- --- . --- - - - - - -- -43_53 •
CHECK REGISTER 09 -12 -88 PAGE 26
ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE
_. -- SERVICES - - -'
REPAIR PARTS
e56M91 09 /Oe /6S e33.10 MODERN EQUIPMENT CONTRACTED REPAIRS
233.10 +
I
#** * **
256M93
09/06/88
f0e.60
E36M93
09/06/88
199.50
',256M93
09/06/68
102.60
256M93
09/06/88
291.66
—
— - - -- —
- 696736
x' ssss#s
-: i
256M97
08/22/88
9,597.40
- - - - - --
-
9,597.40
MOTOROLA EQUIP MAINT
MOTOROLA EQUIP MAINT
MOTOROLA EQUIP MAINT
MOTOROLA EQUIP MAINT
MPLS FINANCE DEPT. WATER
x
13
10 -4201- 643 -64 070232 '
10- 4540- 560 -56 070e11 e
e
c
f *# -CK3
40- 4e48- 801 -80 004541 6819 - -- - ----------- - - - -.�
h
I,
10-4274- 4eO -42 751909
10-4274- 420 -42 757301
10 -4274- 420 -42 739933
10 -4274- 420-42 739934
**w-CKS
1;2
x3
x4
** *-CKS Ize
za�
40- 4640 - 803 -80
I31
]
* * #* **
-.,
*00-CKS
i3
35
"1256N01
09/02/68
661.50
MPLS GUN CLUB PRO SH
TARGETS
131
E9- 4648- 7Ee -7E 22061 6771
661.50 *
130
!40
- - - -- --- -
- - - -- - - - -- --
-- - --
- --
4'
I- e36NO3
06/70/60
1,590.00
MPLB SEWER 6 WATER
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
40 -4e4S- 001 -80 e0664 6606
'4
-�
-_
---—-----
1,590.00 f
--'- - - -- - - -
- -- _— ..--- ' -- - -44
— --- -_
- - --
- -45
ae
• *• * **
--------
- - - - -- - --
** *-CKS
40
_
X49
256N13
08/26/88
40.23
MUZAK
ADVERTISING OTHER
50-4214- 82E -82
50
'.256N13
08/26/88
40.23
MUZAK
ADVERTISING OTHER
50- 4214 - 862 -86
el
80.46 •
-
-- - -
-
- -'53
*** —CKS
e4
155
'5e
Ie56Ne2
08/26/88
70.00
NAATL GUARDIAN 8YS.
ALARM SERVICES
50- 4304 - Set -82 67701
5-
.50
70.00 *
50
co
* ** -CKS
tea
164
i 256N31
08/22/88
71.55
NEBCO DISTRIBUTING
— CON Ks "IN
399545097
I' 256N31
08 /2e /88
81.38
NEBCO DISTRIBUTING
CONCESSIONS
e6- 4624- 683 -68 44095 4505
rn
152.93
.,I •s * * **
** *-CKS
�256N73
oe /30/as
680.00
NEL— §OAS -ADfO —CORM —PART
- �G26=560 =5b—i� ��03
n
-3
',256N33
08/30/88
369.00
NELSON RADIO COMM
PARTS
10-4620- 560 -56 14925 6554
14
1988' CI F EDINA
%J I
\_ CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT
5
. 2 -
'how
CHECK RE ER 09-12-88
as
09/02/88
3,670.52
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
10-4524-314-30
1575
2-1256M42
256M42 __- _______08/30/88_-
___,_____
- - ---
890.00
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
10-45e4-380-30
001498
3.
JE56M4e
08/30/88
555-3e
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
40-45e4-803-80
001498
'd eSGM4e
oe/ee/se
361.09
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
40-4524-803-80
1349
15,
50.il s
7
•*• -CKS
of
eS6M58
09/06/88
187.1e
MILLIPORE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
48
64859 6111
1,3
187.12
- ------------------------
I'll-CK9
I
TOOL CO.
TOOLS
10-4580-301-30
zo
47.40
0**-CKS
12
23
24
L,56M68
08/26/88
196.37
MN.
CELLULAR TEL.
SUBSCRIPTION
10-4204-140-14
2.5
13
MN.
CELLULAR TEL.
EQUIP RENTAL
10-4226-420-42
2n
256.50
2390
vow-CKS
13
3
,256M70
08/30/86
38.00
MN,
CONWAY
EQUIP MAINT
10-4274-4e0 -4E
119621
33
34
-1, 3. 0. 0
MN.
CONWAY
EQUIP MAINT
10-4e74-440-44
120193
35
.iE56M70
08/30/66
37.50
MN.
CONWAY
EQUIP MAINT
10-4e74-440-44
Ile-696--
37
'Je56M?0
00/30/86
484.00
MN.
CONWAY
CLOTHING REPLACEMENT
10-4574-440-44
120306
138
2SGM70
_160.00-
MN.
CONWAY
CREDIT
10-4901-440-44
120811 6180
13.
,e56M70
og/oe/se
1,410.00
MN.
CONWAY
EQUIP REPLACE
10-4901- 440 -44
1E 68T 16180
4 .
1,9ee.50 s
14.1
43
• * -p 4. v IF
**"-CKS
256M76
08/e3/88
10E.54
MN.
CLOVE
GENERAL SUPPLY
40-4504-800-80
E3434
�45
4M
47'
40
102.54
142
•*O-CKS
256M80
08/22/88
87.02
MN.
SUBURBAN NEWS
ADVERTISING
10-4210-140-14
03
256M80
09/02/88
544.23
MN.
SUBURBAN NEWS
ADVERTISING
10-4210-140-14
154
IE56M80
08/26/88
252.82
MN.
SUBURBAN NEWS
ADVERTISING LEGAL
10-41'10-140-14
cr 97. a5
884.07
e56m81
256M81
oe/23/se
21.48
7-
MN.
TORO INC.
---REPAIR--
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540-560-56
7e1039 '50,
!60
08/22/88
.-4-
M N___.TO
FCC)— INC
PARTS
Es:m:l /Ze/ea 67.08 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 27-4540-664-66
es. M I 00:/ae/as e9.47 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS E7-4540-664-66
I-
720747
721797
E56m81
os/ee/as
TV. 3i___MN_.T0RCF_IN_C.
EPA I R-P-AR
0;---6 64-m--A-6-Te
0 9 3 v
o34
4
e56M81
09/02/88
372.98
MN.
TORO INC.
REPAIR PARTS
27-4540-664-66
723255 6589
ee
256M81___08/22/88
93.71
MN.
TORO INC.
REPAIR PARTS
27-4540-664-66
721875
e56m81
09/02/88
e8.09
MN.
TORO INC.
REPAIR
771.53 •
70
71 4
72
*• *-cgs
73
74
09/02/88
ESO.00
VALLEY WHOLESALE
SERVICES
e7-4e01-664-66
L
8367
75
Y
1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 09 -12 -88 PAGE 24
CHECK NO. DATE - -- -- AMOUNT _ VENDOR - ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P.O. 0 MESSAGE
f'i - - - -- - - 4,940.00 s — - --
ssssss sss - CKS
6399
256ME7
107.30
MAYO DIST.
INVENTORY
SO- 4630 - 842 -84
GENERAL SUPPLY
10-4504 - 560 -56
19720
— - --
-
_ 08/30/88
256M16
08/26/88 _
805.24
MCCAREN DESIGNS _
-PLANTINGS _&- TREES___--
-_.30- 4560- 782 - 78_15391.
I 1 -;
32.85 »
805.24
08/23/68
437.25
MERIT
ssssss
PARTS
10 -4620- 560 -56
19742
256ME7
09/02/88
E56ME5
08/30/80
135.66
MED OXYGEN S EQUIP
EQUIP MAINT
10-4ET4- 440 -44 130060
6337
256M25
09/02/88
. _ 41.90 _ _
-_ MED OXYGEN 6 EQUIP
FIRST AID SUPPLY
10- 4510- 440 -44 350330
�._
19789
177.56 •
_09/02/88_
08/30/88
-_
436.00
- - -- - -- -
I-
I
MISC
25- 4924= S26=SL57
-1
633
I256ME7
09/02/88
1,314.00
MERIT
SUPPLY
6399
sss -CKS
7
e
9
io
,1
1?
;13
1•
;15
1e
!n
e
Iv
n
_ X21
sss -CKS ze
25
26
2-7
_ zo
;b
130
131
32
,3
3a
35
.--- _.— . —._ -- 36
3
38
311
no
41
i<7
da
as
47
as
lag
sss -CKS 3C
'31
'37
154
55
35
•� « =CKB 37
459
59
—__ 60
X61
Ie2
*o*-CKS 'cn
sss -CKS
65
60
6,
256ME7
08/23/88
250.70
MERIT
SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLY
10-4504 - 560 -56
19720
256ME7 _-
_ 08/30/88
_ - 84.15 -
MERIT
SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10 -4 4504- 628 -62
19844
32.85 »
256ME7
08/23/68
437.25
MERIT
SUPPLY
PARTS
10 -4620- 560 -56
19742
256ME7
09/02/88
3,640.00
MERIT
SUPPLY
MISC
25- 4924 - 520 -52
19790
6337
E56M2T
METRO WASTE CONTROL
149.50
MERIT_
SUPPLY
MISC
25- 4924 - 520 -52
19789
256M2T
i
_09/02/88_
08/30/88
-_
436.00
MERIT
SUPPLY
MISC
25- 4924= S26=SL57
-1
633
I256ME7
09/02/88
1,314.00
MERIT
SUPPLY
MISC
25- 4924 - 520 -52
19853
6772
%-7 256ME7
08/EE/88
48.00
MERIT
SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLY
27- 4504- 663 -66
19721
6452
I7IE56ME7
08/30/88
214.70
MERIT
SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
28 -4S12- 702 -70
19805
6573
ES6M27
08/22/88
497.75
MERIT
SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
19788
10-4524- 314 -30 001498
E36ME7
09/02/88
470.40
MERIT
SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504- 782 -78
19855
E56M27
08/26/68
334.31
MERIT
SUPPLY - - -
-- GENERAL SUPPLIES -
30= -4504= 782 =75
-19622
256ME7
09/06/88
484.30
MERIT
SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 762 -78
19897
6656
256ME7
09/06/88
459.50
MERIT
SUPPLT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504- 782 -78
19893
,256ME7
09/06/88
491.10
MERIT
SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES -
-- 30 =4504= 782 -78-
19898 -_
--6118
256M27
08/26/88
2,270.00
MERIT
SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540- 801 -80
19761
6294
sss -CKS
7
e
9
io
,1
1?
;13
1•
;15
1e
!n
e
Iv
n
_ X21
sss -CKS ze
25
26
2-7
_ zo
;b
130
131
32
,3
3a
35
.--- _.— . —._ -- 36
3
38
311
no
41
i<7
da
as
47
as
lag
sss -CKS 3C
'31
'37
154
55
35
•� « =CKB 37
459
59
—__ 60
X61
Ie2
*o*-CKS 'cn
sss -CKS
65
60
6,
11,581.66 #
- !256M31
08/23/88
32.85
METRO FONE COMM.
GENERAL SUPPLY —
A0= 4504= 801 =80- 279031
i
32.85 »
so
n'256M35
A8 /22188
191,729.94
METRO WASTE CONTROL
SEWER SERVICE
40- 4312 - 812 -80 5789
- ----- -
- - - -1 91 , 729 .94 s
ESGM39
09/02/88
32.00
MID CENTRAL INC.
CLOTHING REPLACE
10 -4574- 440 -44 3009
32.00 •
I
ssssss
I256M42
09�02�68
MZDWE$T A$PN}GLT COR--
1,776.17
BCACKTB
10-45E4--301--30-1575—
"!256M42
08/30/88
3,697.04
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
10-4524- 314 -30 001498
sss -CKS
7
e
9
io
,1
1?
;13
1•
;15
1e
!n
e
Iv
n
_ X21
sss -CKS ze
25
26
2-7
_ zo
;b
130
131
32
,3
3a
35
.--- _.— . —._ -- 36
3
38
311
no
41
i<7
da
as
47
as
lag
sss -CKS 3C
'31
'37
154
55
35
•� « =CKB 37
459
59
—__ 60
X61
Ie2
*o*-CKS 'cn
sss -CKS
65
60
6,
1988 Cl'
EDINA
CHECK RE
ER
\
+N
09_12 -88
_ 23
CHECK N0.
T - - - - - -
DATE
-- — --
AMOUNT
-
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. A PO A
. . .
MESSAGE
� ssssrs
I,
- - --
- -- -- -- - - - - -
-- - -- - - - - - -- - — --
- - - - - -- - -- --
_
***-Cgs
256L36
OB /30/88
100.00
LEFFLER PRINTING
PRINTING
30- 4600 - 781 -78 3244
6
- _ --
- _1.00 _00
ie
ho
�I
***-C KB
256L46
"!256L46
08/30/88
60.00
LIEN INFECTION CON
SERVICES
10 -4201- 630 -62 0 01628
--
L-
z
08/22/88
62.00
LIEN INFECTION CON
SERVICES
27-4201-663-66 161063
+4
-----------------
-
- -- 1_22- .00__r
e.
- -
ii
�'e�
rrrrsr
-CKS
to
7!
08/22/88
6.50
6.50
. -------------- - -- ---
LIHHOFF
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 100 -10 137654
-
:20
i
6.50 *
121
122
l-
123
sss =CKS
=�
256L60
2 5 61 6 8 —06,o
08/23/88 2,562.43 _
a 3o, e e 4-i 2 49 . 4e
-- LOGIS —
L e G i s ---- - - -
DATA PROCESSING
- -- -- - -- -- - - - - -- -
10 -4233- 160 -16
- --
26
7v
Szm e
10
-'9-2$
i256L60__08/23/88
1,783.24
L_OGIS
'1�
DATA PROCESSING 10 -4233- 200 -20
256L60
256L60
08/23/58
08/23/88
3,490.42
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
10-4233- 420 -42
'3J
256L60_
08/23/88-
903.56
LOGI3
DATA PROCESSING
40-4233- 800 -80
�
'I G96L60
08/G3/88 -- -
- - -- 240.,_49
LOG I3
DATA PROCESSING
-
50-_4233- 820 -82
"
36
256L60
08/23/88
240.49
LOGIS
-
DATA PROCE88I PROCESSING
- -50- 4233 - 840 -84
- -' --
37
240.47
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
50-4233- 860 -86
3
4 461.10 r
�
lJG
�
do
u
d
256L62
c„� °�1256L62
08/26/88
08/30/88
60.00
LOLA EDMON
_ _
PROF —8 E-R ii _IC a
27- 4201 - 662 -16 0813
--
�z
43
W
4d
1-
80.00
LOLA EDMON
SERVICES
27- 4201 - 662 -18 0811 5753
a3
46
la7
- - --
-
_ 1 60 .00 •
C.; "`� rsrrs•
<
ssr-CKS
: "I256L80
08/22/88
38.17
LYNDALE GARDEN CTR
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 644 -64 2797 6564
51
�?
�
38.17 •
03
154
.,i -- — ---
' rrrrsr -
-
-
lee
ee�
iis=CK,
256M02
256MO2
08/26/88
08/26/88
27@.69
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC.
-MAC - -
REPAIR PARTS
--
10- 4540 - 560 -56 86477 6431
159
- 256M02
08/26/88
E84.78-
QUEEN` EQUIP INC..
REPAIR -PARTS
0= 4540 = 560 =5b -86223
I
—161
=°
@v.a"
290.61
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC.
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56 86612 6508
e
278.52 r
64
rrr —CKS
ae
2B6M12
tl
08/22/88
198.64
MATHISON CO. _
_
COST OF COMMODITIES
-
23 -4624613 -61 90475
az�
en
198.64
60
7 (I
256M1�
m1" 256M13
09/02/88
09/08/88
1,430.00
3,510.00
_ _
MATT BULLOCK CONBT,
RIP RAP
10 -8548- 358 -30 6299
2
e7
MATT BULLOCK CONST
SAND GRAVEL 6 ROCK
27 -4522- 664 -66 6299
7O
----- "_ - - --
..—
-
-
77
V
7
i" 1988 CITY OF EDINA
\ CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
895.00
"'e56K45 08Je6/88
87.00
I'
I256K42
08/22/88
5, 084.11
. ;e56K42
08 /2e /88
5,312.22
e56K4E
oe/E3/68
5,130.68
Fi
10- 4504 - 322 -30
15,227.21 +
" ssssss
* * * *•.
:r . ,..
99434-74-
es6K45 oe/e6 /88
895.00
"'e56K45 08Je6/88
87.00
e56K45 - — 06/e6/88 -
•..• . _. - -
-- 55.60 _
,I
1 , 037.60 •
sus -DRS
33
CHECK REGISTER 09 -12 -88 PAGE ee
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE
KOCH MATERIALS CO__._ _ ROAD OIL
KOCH MATERIALS CO ROAD OIL
KOCH MATERIALS CO ROAD OIL
KOKOSH ATHLETIC GENERAL SUPPLIES
KOK08H ATHLETIC GENERAL SUPPLIES
-- - KOK08H ATHLETIC - _ GENERAL SUPPLIES
Ii
;Ie56K63 09/06/88 86.26 KUSTOM ELECTRONICS RADAR
- - - - - - -- -- — -- — -
86. 6 ! -- -- -- -
�= * * ** **
256LO6
=1 e56L06
08/30/88 ___ __._ _._ 240.00 _ LAKE_ RESTORATION ____._SERVICES_
08/30/88 480.00 LAKE RESTORATION SERVICES
480.00 -s- 720.00
z
3 v
10 -45e6- 314 -30 711347 4913
10- 4526 - 314 -30 709809
10 -4526- 314 -30 815389
v
s ** -CKS a
I I
10- 4504 - 681 -6e 15430 6709 '13
10-4504- 6E1 -6E 15579 14
', e
10- 4504- 6e1 -6e 15622 ,e
10- 4901 - 420 -42
10- 4201- 358 -30 _ 3671
10- 4201 - 358 -30 3686
-- In
le
itv
ss* -CKS za
z1
Izz
23
124
zs
*** -CKS 5
n
za
3
7
f
* ** -CKS
171
72
"1
* * * *•.
:r . ,..
99434-74-
ne .� n...
man nn
, nvw stT�rw
EDIUIP
8ERVICEB
]0- 4E01- 3B0 -30
sus -DRS
33
421.56
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 322 -30
993704
256L28
08/22/88
3s
37
ss *s*s
PRODUCTS
_
GENERAL SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 560 -56
993703
_
256L28
08/22/88
144.17
9**-CKS
30
e56L10
oe /e3/86
30.50
LAKELAND
ENGINEERING
REPAIR PARTS
40-4540- 81e -80
L83414
PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLY
I
-
30.50
es
09/02788
_e3e.51
107.79
LAW80N
PRODUCTS
TOOLS—
TOOL9
10-4580- 440 =44
- 999370bZi260
e56L28
08/30/88
558.51
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
40 -4540- 803 -80
99370e 63e4
* ** -CKS
�z
qe
e56Lee
09 /0e /88
179.60
LANDSCAPE
8
TURF
GENERAL SUPPLY
e7 =4504- 664 =66
7372 668e
Jv
08 /ee /88
250.00
LANDSCAPE
6
TURF
FERTILIZER
27-4558- 664 -66
3336 6309
COFITR7�CTED�EPi�I718�0�248=
j0'e56L2e
256L2e_
08/30/88
ee1.75
LANDSCAPE
6
TURF
SOD 6 BLACK DIRT
27 -456e- 664 -66
3364
71
256L22
08/30/88
450.00
LANDSCAPE
6
TURF
SOD 6 BLACK DIRT
27- 4562- 664 -66
3360
:53
1 , 101 .35 s
7e
I„
7
f
* ** -CKS
171
72
"1
`
I
"' e56LeB
,08/2e/88
421.56
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 322 -30
993704
256L28
08/22/88
122.35
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
_
GENERAL SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 560 -56
993703
_
256L28
08/22/88
144.17
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLY
10-4504- 646 -64
993146'
e56LE8
08 /ee /88
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 646 -64
993705
es
09/02788
_e3e.51
107.79
LAW80N
PRODUCTS
TOOLS—
TOOL9
10-4580- 440 =44
- 999370bZi260
e56L28
08/30/88
558.51
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
40 -4540- 803 -80
99370e 63e4
-
-- -- - -
-- -1,586.89
=' 256L30
COFITR7�CTED�EPi�I718�0�248=
867= 83- Tb-1- bs —bT4T-
0902/88
250.OGZ�GYNE
FTINNE�3�Ti�CO—
F
250.00 s
7
f
* ** -CKS
171
72
"1
\
\
v�
n`
v
v
11
1988 -CI1 EDINA CHECK RE. _R 09 -te -88 ei
C►IFCK NA_ nATF ANMINT VFunno TTCw nuaroToT *nu ArrnuuT un tuu a o n r uecoAee
I
'2
256J31
08/22/88
142.66
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 644 -64
I
'
31
256J31
08/29/.88
71.54
JERRYS_ HARDWARE
SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 646 -64
4I956J31
08 /ee /88
17.89
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10-4504- 660 -66
e56J31
08/22/88
54.57
JERRYS HARDWARE
CLEANING SUPPLIES
10 -451e- 440 -44
°
°__256131
08/22/88
11.49
JERRYS HARDWARE
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
7
7rESGJ31
Oe /22 / /8e
16.58
JERRYS HARDWARE
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
9
°
e56J31
08 /2e /88
19.56
JERRYS HARDWARE
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
1O
9
256J31__
- 0.8 /22 /8BL02.0T
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
eT- 4504- 662 -66
;_
0
956131
08 /ee /88
35.46
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
27-4504- 664 -66
+3
1
256J31
OB /e2 /8B
19.86
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
e9- 4504- 7e2 -7e
14
25GJ3.1
08(22/88
66_59
JERRYS HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
40- 4504 - 801 -80
la
3 25GJ31
08 /ee /ee
31.55
JERRYS HARDWARE
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 803 -80
+7
899.58 t
+a
19
Its
e •lift•
�
111 -CKS
0
2+
22
11.256J35
09/02/88
-
1,12e.77
JERRYS PRINTING
PRINTING
10- 4600- 180 -18
e133
6728
23
zs
19I
11122.77 l
27
2oi
26
2f, llM�ll
ll* -CKS
za
2z
23
256J74
08/:3/88
66.15
JUBTUS LUMBER
GENERAL SUPPLY
10 -4504- 646 -64
433eO
6300
24
e56J74
08/E3/88
43.7:
JUBTUS LUMBER
TOOLS
10 -4580- 301 -30
40620
6035
�+
e36JT4
09/06188
186.18
JUSTUB LUMBER
PAINT
30- 4544 - Tee -TB
49571
6773
�3
obi
e96.05
35'
3
20 *lltll
29
* ** -CKS
30 _e6_6K09
08 /e6 /Be
1_0.49
KAMAN BEARINB 6 SPLY
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
646606
40'
31 e56K09
08 /ee /88
149.58
KAMAN BEARING 6 SPLY
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
6455ee
.i
32
160.00 t
42
33
43
44
34 llllll
35
*00-CKS
4s
3G_[256K35
08/e2/_88
27.00
KNOX LUMBER CO.
GENERAL SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 644 -64
626589
650e
46
d7
3' e56K35
09/06/88
21.91
KNOX LUMBER CO.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 646 -64
629947
6694
4
3"IeSGK35
06 /ee /8B
10.e5
KNOX LUMBER CO.
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 330 -30
6e6eB6
6471
'O
:10
39 e56K35
08 /ee /8B
11e.86
KNOX LUMBER CO.
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 540 -54
696789
6356
40 256K33
oe/ee /ee
133.38
KNOX LUMBER CO.
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540 - 540 -54
696980
6370
53
41 Z56K35
08 /Ze /98
151.17
KNOX LUMBER CO.
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 540 -54
64e466
6495
54
42 Z_36K33
oe /ee/ee
49.67
KNOX LUMBER CO.
TOOLS
10-4580- 301 -30
641362
6504
56
43 e56K35
00/at/se
995.60
KROX LUMBER CO.
LUMBER
0�3i3= 6{3><3Z9Q
57
I44 e56K35
08/30/88
41.03
KNOX LUMBER CO.
LUMBER
10- 4604 - 646 -64
641383
6611
58
I'45 e56K35
08/30/88
29.95
KNOX LUMBER CO.
LUMBER
10 -4604- 646 -64
630016
s9+
60
61
a6 8S6K35 08/29/88 IeT.79 KNOX LUI'fBE*-C MBE - bQ4<= 6-4-6= �bE8T -6 {4
47 e56K35
08/22/88
46.48
KNOX LUMBER CO.
LUMBER
10 -4604- 646 -64
6e7015
6473
62
48 e56K35
08/30/88
e4.99
KNOX LUMBER CO.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
27- 4504- 664 -66
641468
6577
63,
64
49 e56K35
09/06/88
. 3
�A63�CU
A
- - -Q -
6121
6 6
so e56K35
08/30/88
50.64
KNOX LUMBER CO.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
28-4504- 70e -70
6e6857
66
67,
51 e56K35
09/06/88
48.79
KNOX LUMBER CO.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ee- 4504- 702 -70
630202
6657
- .___ _
sz e56K35
_. _-- __
08/26/88
37.98
KNOX LUMBER CO.
-GENERAL-SUP
_
=504= 867= S�b�f3
feu
68
53 256K35
08/22/88
29.75
KNOT( LUMBER CO.
GENERAL SUPPLY
40-4504 - 801 -80
626685
6372
1.
64 256K35
08 /ee /B8
94.7e
KNOX LUMBER CO.
GENERAL SUPPLY
40 -4504- 801 -80
626672
6440
,
2
'8
1,394.49 t
36
'7 ssllll
ttt -CKS 1779
74
78 I
V
,
1988 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK N0. DATE
( ssssss
`- eB6I18 _ - 0!/06/88
n'.
f' ssssss
256Iee 08/23/88
I'^ •fffff
e56I53 08/30/88
i
I'
I'
256161
CHECK REGISTER
- —
AMOUNT--------- - VENDOR _ ITEM DESCRIPTION
1,492.35 s
e, 814.00 ICBI _ - _ SERVICE CONTRACTS
2,814.00 »
e94.08 INDUST & TRUCK PARTS REPAIR PARTS
294.08 •
40.00 INTL CON BLDG OFFCLS BOOKS
40.00 f
08/30/_89 _ _ 400 . 9e __ __ __— INTERSTATE _
400.92 ; - — -
I- P-56I74 06/26/88 68.95 I08
1 �''_ - - - - - 88.95 f -- - - - - --
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
09 -12 -88 PAGE 20
ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. M MESSAGE
is
13
— -- -- - -- -- » » »- CKS - --
e
I�
10 -4288- 510 -51 21979 e
0
I"
as» -CKS
3
10- 4540 - 560 -56 52448 6475 '4
ate
he
fsf -CKS I1°
10 -450e- 490 -49 - --- - - - -- - --
12t 2
*rf-CK8 .2
z
10 -4e4e- 560_56 115547
27- 4516- 661 -66 K07546
s# »-CKS ;
fff -CKS
at
Paz
- *w +-CKS .e
et
73
!e.
i57
ea
fff -CKS '�°
c:
—_ Pn
i
e56J14
OB /e6 /98
168.75
JACOBSON SUPPLY
CHEMICALS
30- 4S64- 793 -78 OGG
168.75 s
I' e56Je7
08/30/88
S.50
JERRYS
FOODS
MEETING EXPENSE
10 -4e06- 440 -44
256JeT
08/e6/88
_
135.16
JERRYS
FOODS
GENERAL SUPPLIEB
10�
ER
09 -12 -88
19
1988•CI1
EDINA
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. 0
CHECK RE
•
—
(
�. 256H33
CHECK NO.
DATE
_ AMOUNT_
VENDOR
38925 6477
10- 4286 - 220 -22
I] •
�12�256H09
08/30/88
1,641.25
HALLMAN
iw
_
1,836.37 •
-- -- --
is
°
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 646 -64
171028 6492
- - -- - ---- -
- - - - -- -- -----
08/30/88
- - - - -- --- - - - - --
9.56
HARMON CLASS —
!256H21
aJI"1256H21
06/30/88
32.98
HARMON CLASS
42.54 �. - --
- -- -- - - - --
.d,
ES6Hee
08/e3/88
42.71
HAYDEN- MURPHY
4/
42.71 •
10- 4540 - 560 -56
18025 6439
388.00
17
- -- - -- - - - --- --
- - -- --
10- 4286- ee0 -e2
-- - - - -
17186
-
,e
I19 \
ER
09 -12 -88
19
_ ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. 0
MESSAGE
•
—
(
�. 256H33
08/30/88
!2
LUBRICANTS
10 -4618- 560 -56
38925 6477
10- 4286 - 220 -22
I] •
Ys
3*
_eS6H33_____-
_09/06/88
- -
64._50
_
HENN CTY SHERIFF
* «« -CKS
is
°
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 646 -64
171028 6492
;1\
i
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 646 -64
171020 6484
�9
33
.d,
—;u
* ** -CKS
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
18025 6439
388.00
17
- -- - -- - - - --- --
- - -- --
10- 4286- ee0 -e2
-- - - - -
17186
-
,e
I19 \
--
------------
-
- - - -» » » -CKS - ---
1 2 1
•
zz
23 \
I" e56H32 -_ 08/30/88 _ — ----18.00 HEDGES -DIANA GENERAL_ SUPPLIES 23- 4504- 611 -61 Iz4
i_ 256H32 08/30/88 25.00 HEDGES -DIANA CRAFT SUPPLIES 23-4588 - 6111 -61 25
a,l 256H32 08/30/88 100.91 HEDGES -DIANA CRAFT SUPPLIES 23- 4588 - 611 -61 =G
L
- - - -
--
—
(
�. 256H33
08/30/88
499.65
HENN CTY SHERIFF
ROOM d BOARD
10- 4286 - 220 -22
Ys
3*
_eS6H33_____-
_09/06/88
- -
64._50
_
HENN CTY SHERIFF
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 420 -42
;1\
i
564.15
*
33
.d,
134
e56H34
08/30/88
388.00
-
HENN COUNTY TREAS.
ROOM 6 BOARD
10- 4286- ee0 -e2
-- - - - -
17186
-
- - - -
--
I...
388. 00
•
37
�„ •%
I3o
• ** * **
- -- -- - ----
- - - - -- --
--
--
— * ** -CKS
I4
e56HS6
08 /ee /88
151.90
HIRSHFIELDS
GENERAL SUPPLY
30- 4504 - 782 -78
333872
6e85
14i
d2
43,
256H56
08/22/88___ __________
-_- 28_.76.-
__-
HIRSHF_iELDB
GENER_A_L SUPPLY
30- 4504 - 78_333871
6285
I"�256HSG
08/30/88
44.15
HIRSHFIELDS
PAINT
_782_-
30 -4S44- 782 -78
353604
6e85
a5
'�'i
224.81
•
q6
--
- -- - - -
- -- -
147
�' I • * « * «*
*00-CKS
q9
� ";
•
eSGH63
08/22/88__
HOFFERS
FIELD MARKINGS
10- 642 -64
65071
6423
3;
_ _
e56H63
_
08/30/88
- _________174.50___-
174.50
_--
_INC
HOPPERS INC
FIELD MARKING
_4_563-
10-4563- 642 -64
65286
6604
- 53
+NI''
349.00
•
ed
- --
- --
lea •
* * * * «•
r* *SRS
56
ie0
- `e66HT4
09 /06 /BB-
HOOTEN CLEANERS
LAUNDRY
10- 4e6e- 4e0 -4e
e9�8
_
_ .. - -
-- - -- -11.66
11.66 -
* - --
- --
— -
--
--
GI
G2
_
--
+•• -CKS
Ia,,
rl`'!256H85
08/26/88
275.00
HUMPHREY RADIATOR
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
6556
G5
IG�S
- --
- -- - - -- - -
- - - - -2 75 ._0 0
— - -
- --
4d
I.q
� e56I1e 08 0fee /8e e14.00 IBM CORPORATION
e56I12 08/22/88 1,278.3S IBM CORPORATION
SERVICE CONTRACTS 10 -4eee- 510 -51
SERVICE CONTRACTS 10-4288- 510 -51
* ** -CKS
I -1
J 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER
CHECK_N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
50.00 •
s » »sss
E66G57 oe/eb/ae
09 -12 -88 PAGE 18
ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. A MESSAGE
I•
- --
---
26
- - - - --
12-. 00
,
e
7
GOPHER
OIL CO.
GENERAL BUPPLIEe
10- 4501- 560 -56
347999 6500
38.00 •
GRAYBAR
--
CO.
e56G59
09/06/88
637.60
-- - -
- - -- -
-- - -- - -- — — - -
-- - -- - -- -- -- -
- -
10
Il 1
» »» - C K S
GOPHERS
SHOOTERS
AMMUNITION
10- 457e- 420 -42
03e857 6711
3
4
le
CO.
REPAIR
e56G6e
08 /ee /e8
t00.s0
GRAYBAR
'
256661!
09/06/88
110.00
117
J4
256662
08/22/88
— - -- -
111.00
» »s -CK5 Ie
ID
GRANDMA
8 CUPBOARD
- 321.50
_
s
3439
20
;21
GRANDMA
S CUPBOARD
CONCESSIONS
'
256G68
09/02/88
54.62
S CUPBOARD
CONCESSIONS
256668
09/02/88
'L3
74
256668
69/02/88
132.55
e56G68
08/22/88
207.17
- - -- - - - -- -- ------
635.08 -
'
e56G76
Oe /30/96
tE6.93
256G76
08/30/88
168.45
295 2B
+
09 -12 -88 PAGE 18
ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. A MESSAGE
GREEN ACREH BPRNKIR. 9ERVI699 10 =4801= 643 =6�
GREEN ACRES SPRNKLR. SERVICES 10 -4201- 643 -64
256688 09%36%88 200.00 GRU0-itR 8 -P0uEl - EBUIP- EOUIP- REPLWCEMENT ------0= 4901 = 650 =64 762 6
200.00 s
II
I•
- --
---
26
- - - - --
-- 207.34 s
,
e
7
GOPHER
OIL CO.
GENERAL BUPPLIEe
10- 4501- 560 -56
347999 6500
38.00 •
GRAYBAR
--
CO.
REPAIR
PARTS
e
9
-- - -
- - -- -
-- - -- - -- — — - -
-- - -- - -- -- -- -
- -
10
Il 1
» »» - C K S
GOPHERS
SHOOTERS
AMMUNITION
10- 457e- 420 -42
03e857 6711
3
4
le
CO.
REPAIR
PARTS
10= 4540= 5 -40 =54- 651 -7i 6668
33
GRAYBAR
ELECTRIC
CO.
REPAIR
PARTS
117
J4
» »s -CK5 Ie
ID
GRANDMA
8 CUPBOARD
CONCESSIONS -
eT- 4624- 66e -66
3439
20
;21
GRANDMA
S CUPBOARD
CONCESSIONS
27 -4624- 663 -66
3753
2=
GRANDMA
—
S CUPBOARD
CONCESSIONS
27 -4624- 663 -66
— -_
3e
'L3
74
GREEN ACREH BPRNKIR. 9ERVI699 10 =4801= 643 =6�
GREEN ACRES SPRNKLR. SERVICES 10 -4201- 643 -64
256688 09%36%88 200.00 GRU0-itR 8 -P0uEl - EBUIP- EOUIP- REPLWCEMENT ------0= 4901 = 650 =64 762 6
200.00 s
II
I•
- --
---
26
- - - - --
-- 207.34 s
,
1
I256G96
-_CKS
27
L
38.00 •
GRAYBAR
ELECTRIC
CO.
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4S40- SeO -S2 648147 6607
Ir
GRAYBAR
ELECTRIC
CO.
REPAIR
PARTS
10-4540 - 520 -52 649173 6625
;'
GRAYBAR
ELECTRIC
CO.
REPAIR
PARTS
10= 4540= 5 -40 =54- 651 -7i 6668
33
GRAYBAR
ELECTRIC
CO.
REPAIR
PARTS
40- 4540- 801 -80 637740
J4
»+» -CKS
3e
GREEN ACREH BPRNKIR. 9ERVI699 10 =4801= 643 =6�
GREEN ACRES SPRNKLR. SERVICES 10 -4201- 643 -64
256688 09%36%88 200.00 GRU0-itR 8 -P0uEl - EBUIP- EOUIP- REPLWCEMENT ------0= 4901 = 650 =64 762 6
200.00 s
II
I•
- --
---
- - - - --
-- 207.34 s
,
1
I256G96
09/02/88
38.00
L
38.00 •
- sssss•
e56H04
--
94.08 +
1'
7I 256H09
08/30/88
195.1e
GUSTAVE LARSON CO. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 646 -64 560810
GUY SPEARKER CO
HACH CO
HALLMAN
REPAIR PARTS 40 -4540- 801 -80 29964 6626
GENERAL SUPPLIES - - ----10 =4504= 482 -48 367768 6720
LUBRICANTS
10 -4618- 560 -56 38964- 6477
II
I45
•1• —CKB 46
147
�1
e4
e5
] 7
7e
+»» -CKS 'o
IG I
a2
I63
G4
ss »-CKS ""
67
1988'Cl1 EDINA CHECK REk -:R 09-12-8e 17
CHECK NO.DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. • MESSAGE
i I I
230.00
s**-CKS
�r.256E78 ___ --og/oe/ae--- --- 197.14 EMRICH BAKING CO. CONCESSIONS 27-46e4-663-66 3747
7 eS6E7S
; 08/22/88 124.9e EMRICH BAKING CO. CONCESSIONS 97-46e4-663-66
ll-Desfivrs 08/30/88 e09.e6 EMRICH BAKING CO. CONCESSIONS e7-46e4-663-66
esGE:pe 800-30088 eeg eG EMR10im BAKING 60. GQNGESS;qms
pr�g:?@ -08 —o"as °c °9 e6 EMRICH BAKING eG. eGNeESSIONS e9 4fie4 663 66
531.3e
256FOe-- 1- -.08/23/88 125. 00 -----,-.FAC IL ITY -SYSTEMS______,___ MISC 25-4924-5EO-SE 29933
les.00
* * 0 -
***-CKS
7
19
21
22
bl 256F08
09/02/88
4e.00
FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL
FIST AID SUPPLY
10-45I0 -440-44
286783
27
•
***-CKS 30
31
•
E56G24
08/30/88
69.30
GEN. COMMUNICATIONS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
10-4248-440-44
93753
212
33
Oe 26Ge4
OS/23/88
O
82.80
GEN. COMMUNICATIONS
RADIO SERVICE
10 -4E94- 560 -56
93838
13d
135%
e: 6Ge4
P-
OS/3/86
450.0 0
G COMMUNICATIONS
RADIO SERVICE
10- 4E94 - 560 -56
9E809
E56Ge4
08/23/88
67.30
SEN. COMMUNICATIONS
RADIO SERVICE
4e94-560-56
_ 93901
Aw 256GE4
08/e3/88
69.30
GEN. COMMUNICATIONS
RADIO SERVICE
10-4e94-560-56
93837
137
E!56Ge4__
_015/P-3/88
138.40
GEN. COMMUNICATIONS
RADIO SERVICE
10-4e94-560 -56
93476
!4
256G24
09/oe/8e
51.14
GEN. COMMUNICATIONS
RADIO SERVICE
10-4294-560-56
93967 6037
141
928.e4
•
42
43%
14
a+* -CKS j45
7'
256G26---
09/06/88
93.ee
GENERAL OFFICE PROD
GENERAL SUPPLY
10-4504-4e0 -4e
061490
140
------
JESGGes
99 ""
09/06/88
93.ee
66.95
6EMSRAt 01'FIGE PROD
GENERAL OFFICE PROD
GENERA - SUPPL -W
GENERAL SUPPLIES
.0= 4694- 4E0 -48
10-4504-420-4e
113450
e969e6
9 9,, 9 Go 8 8
GENERAI GF�IGE PMT7777=7:!�EN�!AL
SUPPLY
io-4"4 4ec 4e
i i :-r 4s a
152
160.17
5
3
60 ' ,
1:4
57
256G32
08/22/68
54.04
GENUINE PARTS CO.
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540-560-56
79342
m36G3e
08/e6/88
40.29
GENUINE PARTS CO.
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540-560-56
079243
256G3i
0S/L'?-/S16
69.18
GENUINE PARTS CO. --------REPAIR
PARTS
1
7
j
163.51
63
•
157
2S604e
MEBARD_GUNS_ _______AMMUNITION
e9-497e-72e-7E
53848 6456
rsl
129.94
Aw
7
7
0
oo*-Cxs
�rl;" e56944
06/30/86
50.00
GLEN SIPE PAINO SERV
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
30-4248-78e-78
890825
7
4
Mmw7ml
I TIP
1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 09 -t2 -88 PACE 16
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. • MESSAGE
z
J
256D43 08 /L2 /88 27,000..00 __ _.__._DELANO ERICKSON ARCH __CONSTRUCTI,ON.- 28= 1300_000- 00- 3______ —!4
I
981.00 i
.I rrrrrr
256E20 68/26/88 85.00 ECOLAB PEST" ELIM - SERV- CONTRACT -E6 '80= 4288 = 781 =78 -- 81673
ii 85.00 i
I -_
°°Eoc'a7 ^ °� : ^� °° __ 4r ^ °° °}+ enruA FOUNDATION MiSC 10- 3600 -AOA 0A
25bc37 A8+�38•°° 1- ,v9 - --- -- EnIuw FOUNDATION -- - - MI86 - - - -- - -- - 36 -38vv
j4'I256E37 08/30/88 1,098.88 EDINA FOUNDATION MISC 30 -3800- 000 -00
� • - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- 1.098.88 •
I.
e56E39 /30/88 43.75 EDINA LIQUOR STORE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 520 -52
I 08 43.75 i
256E4t 08/30/88 33.27 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS PRINTING 28- 4600 - 701 -70
- --
33.27 i - - - - - - - - --
I 1
trl'^ 256E75 09/02/88 230.00 EMPLOYEES CLUB SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 500 -50
iii -CKS 12C
27
Izo
3, -
13
000-CKS
14,
rrr -CKS q=
42
Iqq
14e
jen '-
000-CKS d9
3.�
S1
72
173
74
I3c "
»» »-CKS Isc
ao
ez
e3
f4
n.
,67
en
---- ._ - -_- __. •e9
I'0
i3t -CKS !7721
J.1
I
G
27,000.00 •
I_ - --
,256D79
- -. _ - —' - --
08/22/88
-- -- - --- - ---
6,2733.19
'
e
17
Ii
:n °°
256DT9
08/22/88
6,791.79
DORSEY d WHITNEY
SERVICES LEGAL
-51
°
�°.oaD47
256D47.
�°'
08/22/88
8�-- r�DE°CrENDA$66
COURIER
__ DEPENDABLE COURIER
POSTAGE
-POSTAGE-.-
1A- {89A- 510
114811'
-60
26.49
09/02/88
483.00
E. H. RENNER 6 SONS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 646 -64 10209 6644
n 3
08/30/88
498.00
E. H. RENNER 6 SONS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
10 -4248- 646 -64 10208
I, 4
iiis » »------
- - - - -- - - -
-- - -- - - --
----
- - - -
--
-
-- - » »s -CKS
7
I,e
1 256D65
08/30/88
726.35
DIXIE
PETRO-CHEM
INC
CHEMICALS
26- 4564 - 682 -68
303785 4706
I1e
256D65
08/30/88
315.00
DIXIE
PETRO -CHEM
INC
CHEMICALS
-
303651 4706
256D65
08/22/88
2,775.49
DIXIE
PETRO -CHEM
INC
CHEMICALS
40 -4622- 805 -80
299004
_Ig
zi
E56063
09/02/88
2,489.08
DIXIE
PETRO-CHEM
INC
CHEMICALS
40-46EE- 805 -80
303602
�2'
"
6,305.92
:a
I
981.00 i
.I rrrrrr
256E20 68/26/88 85.00 ECOLAB PEST" ELIM - SERV- CONTRACT -E6 '80= 4288 = 781 =78 -- 81673
ii 85.00 i
I -_
°°Eoc'a7 ^ °� : ^� °° __ 4r ^ °° °}+ enruA FOUNDATION MiSC 10- 3600 -AOA 0A
25bc37 A8+�38•°° 1- ,v9 - --- -- EnIuw FOUNDATION -- - - MI86 - - - -- - -- - 36 -38vv
j4'I256E37 08/30/88 1,098.88 EDINA FOUNDATION MISC 30 -3800- 000 -00
� • - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- 1.098.88 •
I.
e56E39 /30/88 43.75 EDINA LIQUOR STORE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 520 -52
I 08 43.75 i
256E4t 08/30/88 33.27 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS PRINTING 28- 4600 - 701 -70
- --
33.27 i - - - - - - - - --
I 1
trl'^ 256E75 09/02/88 230.00 EMPLOYEES CLUB SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 500 -50
iii -CKS 12C
27
Izo
3, -
13
000-CKS
14,
rrr -CKS q=
42
Iqq
14e
jen '-
000-CKS d9
3.�
S1
72
173
74
I3c "
»» »-CKS Isc
ao
ez
e3
f4
n.
,67
en
---- ._ - -_- __. •e9
I'0
i3t -CKS !7721
J.1
I
G
I_ - --
,256D79
- -. _ - —' - --
08/22/88
-- -- - --- - ---
6,2733.19
--- - - -- --------
DORSEY d WHITNEY
---- --- -- -__._...__.. --
SERVICES LEGAL
------ -- ------- - - --- -- - -'
t0- 4218 - 220 -22
256DT9
08/22/88
6,791.79
DORSEY d WHITNEY
SERVICES LEGAL
10- 4218 - 220 -22
13,064.98 »
- --
256E-05
09/02/88
483.00
E. H. RENNER 6 SONS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 646 -64 10209 6644
236EOS
08/30/88
498.00
E. H. RENNER 6 SONS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
10 -4248- 646 -64 10208
I
981.00 i
.I rrrrrr
256E20 68/26/88 85.00 ECOLAB PEST" ELIM - SERV- CONTRACT -E6 '80= 4288 = 781 =78 -- 81673
ii 85.00 i
I -_
°°Eoc'a7 ^ °� : ^� °° __ 4r ^ °° °}+ enruA FOUNDATION MiSC 10- 3600 -AOA 0A
25bc37 A8+�38•°° 1- ,v9 - --- -- EnIuw FOUNDATION -- - - MI86 - - - -- - -- - 36 -38vv
j4'I256E37 08/30/88 1,098.88 EDINA FOUNDATION MISC 30 -3800- 000 -00
� • - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- 1.098.88 •
I.
e56E39 /30/88 43.75 EDINA LIQUOR STORE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 520 -52
I 08 43.75 i
256E4t 08/30/88 33.27 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS PRINTING 28- 4600 - 701 -70
- --
33.27 i - - - - - - - - --
I 1
trl'^ 256E75 09/02/88 230.00 EMPLOYEES CLUB SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 500 -50
iii -CKS 12C
27
Izo
3, -
13
000-CKS
14,
rrr -CKS q=
42
Iqq
14e
jen '-
000-CKS d9
3.�
S1
72
173
74
I3c "
»» »-CKS Isc
ao
ez
e3
f4
n.
,67
en
---- ._ - -_- __. •e9
I'0
i3t -CKS !7721
J.1
I
G
Y
4/
1988 -Cl •
• EDINA C
CHECK RE E
ER 0
09 -12 -88 15
+
CHECK NO. D
DATE A
AMOUNT V
VENDOR I
ITEM DESCRIPTION A
ACCOUNT NO. INV. 9
9 P.O. • MESSAGE
z =
_ 108,70 C
CRESCENT ELECTRIC_ R
REPAIR PARTS 1
10- 4540_- 39_0 -30 0
039170 6
6539_ '
,
4I256C7S 0
09/02/88 3
318.62 C
CRESCENT ELECTRIC R
REPAIR PARTS 1
_
_ 4
6617 °
°
427.32 *
* °
°
0 ]
e
IE56C79 0
09/06/86 9
9.35 C
CRICKET PHOTO G
GENERAL SUPPLIES 1
10- 4504 - 200 -20 4
49894 0
0
°I 9
9.35 r
r '
'°
01 rrrrrr r
r ** -CKS 1
13
„ 1
193.42
I S
SUPPLY
14
`t_ 256C87 0
08/22/88 1
34_04 C
CURTIN MATHESON I
GENERAL S
10--4504-482-48 1
10
,e
13,256C87 0
08 /22 /SS 5
51.36 C
CURTIN MATHESON SCI G
GENERAL SUPPLY 1
10- 4504- 482 -48 1
17
+11�256C87 0
08/22/88 2
224.59 C
CURTIN MATHESON SCI G
GENERAL SUPPLY 1
10- 4504- 482 -48 1
1°
"—_ •
• 503.41 1
1°
121
856658 081�231�88 193.48 GURTi6 1090 GENERA6— SUPP6Y 10=45 4 8e 48— 1
B 2
256C8B 0
08/22/85 1
1,461.50 C
CURTIS 1000 P
PAPER SUPPLIES 1
10- 4514 - 510 -51 3
362401 6
6199 1
124
"
- - - - - - - - 1
16 1,461.50 I
20' 2
I25
2' ��srrr *
* ** —CKS 2
2]
u
08/26/88 8
84.75 D
D. C. HEY CO. C
CONTRACTED REPAIRS 2
23- 4248- 61E -61 0
071804
2a1256007 0
08/26/88 2
25.00 D
D. C. HEY CO. S
SERV CONTRACT EO 3
30- 4288 - 781 -78 0
072832 3
3'
`5i -
109.75 r
r 3
3-
r ,
100.00 +
7c
^ e56C75 - 09/06/88 -- 36.00 COURTNEY WAYNE C MILEAGE 10 -4e08- 100 -10
36.00
v -,
__ —_. * ** -CKS ;e
1968 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
09 -12 -88
PAGE 14
f '
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. A
MESSAGE
75.00
+
2
-- -
-- -- --- - --
- - - - -- - - - - --
- - -
-- .e
al * + + +++
* ** -CK3
256C33 _
08 /30 /88
- _ -- 158.73
CITY OF EDINA
WATER
10 -4258- 446 -44
le
e
256C33
08/30/88
43.29
_
CITY OF EDINA
—
WATER
10- 425A- 6�6 -6�
—
e56C33
08/30/88
41.76
CITY OF EDINA
WATER
10- 4258 - 646 -64
I10
.243.78
+-
- - -- -
-
- --
!,:
"ie56C34
06 /ee /88
47.68
CITY OF RICHFIELD
POWER
10-4e5e- 345 -30
"
' - — - --
47.68_*
-
a ++ + + ++
*** -CKS
I,7
18
9
e56C37
i
09/06/88
13.09
CLANCY DRUG INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504- e00 -20
n
7 256C37
09/06/88
19.39
CLANCY DRUG INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 260 -26
122
256C37 - ___09/06/88
i'
- - --
- -- - _ - 60.25
CLANCY DRUG INC.
— GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
In
92.73
* + * * *+
* ** -CKS
27
a
256C39
06/30/88
102.50
CLEAN -FLO LAB
SERVICES
10- 4e4e- 358 -30 4600
s'
- - -- -----
- - - - --
-- 102. -5.0
*
3;
I
* + * + *+
woo-CKS
-33
35
e56C44
oe /ee /ee
605.79
COCA COLA BOTTLING
CONCEe6IONe
e6 -4Ee4- ee3- ee - - - -- -
- - - - --
]5
- -',7
I'JE36C44
08 /e2 /ee
483.50
COCA COLA BOTTLING
CONCESSIONS
27-4624- 663 -66
38
4,9
• * * * *+
** *-CKS
cz
256C46
09/06/88 -
- - - -- - 529.73
- -COLOR TILE - - -
- - -- Misc - - - - -- --
25-4924- 520 -52 - 975463. 6776
592.x-
529.73
4`
* * * * **
** *-CKS
av
e56C51 _
08/22/88
- _ e32.39
—COMM OF_REVENUE - - --
-- - -- -- --
--
-- GASOLINE----
10- 461E - 560 -56
-i
232.39
f
--
- - -- -- - -
-
-he
!
l„
* ** -CKS
• 256C55
08/23/88
161.te
COMPONENT TECH
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56 4e333 6437
'e0
-
- -
- - - _161 _ 12
_ -----
- - - - -- —---- --
- - -- - -- -' - --
--
- - - -- -- --
79
99
* ** -CKS
eI
�e2
03
- - --
-
-
lea
256C57
08 /26T88
100.00
CONCLECO SERV
_ _
�LUAW -1 G S1)"M S
I 0-4S i2' 5- 20= 5$-767 -M-4
ES
100.00 +
7c
^ e56C75 - 09/06/88 -- 36.00 COURTNEY WAYNE C MILEAGE 10 -4e08- 100 -10
36.00
v -,
__ —_. * ** -CKS ;e
Lis
1256C25 _08/22/88
83.30
" 256025 08/2P/88
-
102.00
185.30 »
i �� ssssss
44 E56CE7- 00/30/86
19881CI
EDINA
389.00
CHECK RE
eR
09 -12 -88
_ 13
�I
CHECK -- NO_
DATE
AMOUNT --
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INV. # P.O. #
MESSAGE
•
I 256879
08/23/88
200.00
BROCK WHITE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
40- 4504 - 802 -80
247165
2
..
436.00 .s
- -
a •
yI e56880
0e/ee/ee
140.00
BROWNING FERRIS
SERVICES
10 -4201- 508 -50
•
.256880 --
_08/22/88
140.00__
BRO_WNIN_C_FERRIS__
SERVICES
10- 4201 -5 508 -50
7:e56B80
OB /2e /88
204.00
BROWNING FERRI8
SERVICES
10- 4201 - 508 -50
,*'1 256880
08/22/88
55.23
BROWNING FERRIS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
10 -4248- 646 -64
°
•
256880 -
08/22/88 _
.- . _ 340.00 .__ --
___BROWNING FERRIS _
CONTRACTED _REPAIRS
10 -4E48- 646 -64
;2
' E56B80
09/02/88
90.98
BROWNING FERRIS
- ---- -
RUBBISH REMOVAL
- - - -- - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - --
10-4250-628-62
_
230656
_
_
u
-r" E56B80
08/2P/88
50.00
BROWNING FERRIS
RUBBISH REMOVAL
27 -4250- 662 -66
"
- - --
- --
-- - -- 1 , 0 2 0.21
(w' » » » » »»
»»» -CKS
17
256B91
08/30/88
131.18
BURY b CARLSON INC.
BLACKTOP-
10 -4524- 301 -30
30567
z,
V17 256B91
08/30/88
52.47
BURY & CARLSON INC.
BLACKTOP
27-4524- 664 -66
30567
'z
183.65 •
21 24
f
2
256893
09/02/88
30.00
BUS RECORDS CORP.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 180 -18
607538 6594
tfr' 256B93
08/22/88
37.50
BUS RECORDS CORP.
GENERAL SUPPLY
10 -4504- 180 -18
607247
I" 256893_ -__-
08/22/88
- 56.81-
_BUS RECORDS CORP.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 180 -18
607273
1;�'{I1
256B93
08/26/88
550.00
BUS RECORDS CORP.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10 -4 4504= 160 -18
607372
ial
1r 256893
09/06/88
184.35
BUS RECORDS CORP.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 180 -18
607613 6594
'3'
i 256B93 _
09/02/88
110.00
BUS_RECORDS CORP.
PRINTING
10- 4600- 180 -18
607538 6594
256893
08/22/88
325.00
BUS RECORDS CORP.
VOTING MACHINES
25- 4944- 180 -18
607273
3-7
!y
1,293.66 s
ap
39,
•• * »ss
-
•• * -CK§
(y
142
431
-' 256896
09/06/88
494.08
BUSINESSLAND INC.
SERVICE CONTRACTS
10-4288- 510 -51
12119 6775
494.08 »
- -
- --
- - - --
- - - -- - --
- ., ,
ssssss
�
- - - - - --
- - -- - --
-
s s s -CKS
nl
, .I
256C04
08/22/88
76.00
CAMPBELL SPORTS
-
t11r
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
26- 4642 - 661 -68
9493
c
-
-- - - - -- 76.00 »
,ZIS
tY "� ssssss
sss -CKS
:46
°I
256008
08/22/88
904.19
CARLSON LK ST EQUIP.
REPAIR PARTS
Ar
904.19 »
I
I,-
sod
* *w -CKS - -
-- 6l
Lis
1256C25 _08/22/88
83.30
" 256025 08/2P/88
-
102.00
185.30 »
i �� ssssss
44 E56CE7- 00/30/86
389.00
-
389.00
40, r
CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO
CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO
CHEMLAWN
ADVERTISING
CONTRACTED REPAIR
10 -4210- 140 -14 87356
1n_eatn_ten_te t��§e�
10- 4248- 643 -64
vow-CKS n9
170
1
72
Eg6Ce8_______ -..09. /02/88_,T5�00 CHEMSE_ARCH - GENERAL SUPPLY 10 -4504- 646 -64 81251
lip' T
Rp low,
74
1988 CITY OF EDINA
C
CMFCI[ ND. RATE AMOUNT
q1
CHECK REGISTER 09 -12 -88 PAGE 12
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. S MESSAGE
:
1
0
z
e
!1
!4
:s
!6
17
to
!e
PC
11 --
13
s-
16
17
IB
19
10
ll
12
13
14
a
ie
17
IB
19
O
I1
2
a
14
5
e
i
6
0
3
4
S
0
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
2
256830
08/26/88
6 @.00
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10-4504 - 510 -51
397946
_3.256B30__
- 09/02/88.__ _.___
.1._66 -.
BERTELSON-BROS -INC..
_OFFICE_$UPPL -I E$
10_4516- 16 -0 =16
399046
66_58
4
e56B30
09/06/88
68.88
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10-4516 - 160 -16
400357
6727
°
e56B30
09 /Oe /88
iee.65
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10- 4516 - 510 -51
40065S
°
08_/_30/88
106.ee
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10 -4516- 310 -51
398965
'
_e96830
e56830
09 /Oe /88
e56.50
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10- 4516 - 510 -51
39896e
°
256B30
08/30/88
457.92
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10- 4516- S10 -51
398963
°
E56B30
_ 09 /Oe /_8S_
- 104_.68___
__ERTELSON_BRO.S -INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10- 4516- 510 -51
399046
6658
0
eS6830
09/06/88
84.10
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4516 - 510 -51
399162
"IE56830
06/30/88
43.17
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10- 4516 - 510 -51
399396
12_25683_0
08/30/88
26.73
BERTELSON BROB. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10- 4516 - 510 -51
397228
13
e56B30
09 /Oe /88
90.30
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10-4516 - 510 -51
400653
14
e56B30
09/02/88
30.67
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10- 4516 - 510 -51
400605
67e7
'SL
eS6B30_______09/02/68
169.63
BERTELSON BROS. I_NC.
_OF_FI_C_E SUPPLIES
10- 4516 - 510 -51
400644
16Ie56830
09106188
37.90
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10-4516 - 510 -51
400876
17
te
1,884.25 s
-
19
•� *+�•
+ + +-CK9
2G
21
eS683e
09/06/8_8
29_.84
BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS
GENERAL SUPPLY
10- 4504- 5e0 -se
84913
6833
22
_
E5683e
OS /EE /88
89.E5
BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS
GENERAL SUPPLY
10- 4504- 64B�2iT�fi
-9
23
E5683E
09 /OE /88
127.75
BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540- 646 -64
84685
6540
241
246.84 0
_�yf
26
000000
•44-CKS
°125694e
08 /ee /8B
26.93
BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY
OFFICE SUPPLIES
6- 4516-76T7d
29I
30
26.93
3:
000000
***-CKS
33
e56B54
_08_/26/88_
20.00
BLUM_BERG PHOTO
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
10 -4ee6- 510 -51
R93589
34
E56B54
09/02/88
20.00
BLUMBERG PHOTO
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4ee6 - 510 -51
R93956
35
"3
40.00 +
31
36
00 *000
000-
3d
89_.10
BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE
ADVERTISING
10-4eie- 510 -51
a0
_e56B72____08/30_/88
256B7e
08/30/88
55.87
BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE
GENERAL SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 520 -52
q1
42
144.37 s
43
• *♦AM•
• * +-
44
45
256B74
_^ 99 /OO /88
129_02_ _-
BRAEMAR MAILING SERV
CENTRAL SERVICES
e3 -4802- 611 -61
01316
i
129.02 s
47
40
4r * -CKS
49I
50
256877
09 /Oe /88
1,113.00
BRAUN ENG TESTNG INC
SERVICES
10 -4201- 540 -54
03810
5886
51
E56977
09/06/88
BRAUN ENG TESTNG INC
CONSTRUCTION
60 -IE70- 000 -00
Sz'
- -
- - -. - -- -
_ese.50
1,395.50 +
53
54
256878
08/30/88
75.60
BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 520 -52
102349
55
75.60 0
56
57
256879
08/23/88
e36.00
BROCK WHITE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10-4504- 345 -30
247165
:
1
0
z
e
!1
!4
:s
!6
17
to
!e
PC
11 --
13
s-
16
17
IB
19
10
ll
12
13
14
a
ie
17
IB
19
O
I1
2
a
14
5
e
i
6
0
3
4
S
0
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
l!,
' 1988 •CI
EDINA
2,462.13
W � CHECK RE
ER
vIl
256822,._____08
/22/88
1 575.15
BEER WHOLESALERS
_CHECK NO_
DATE_
_ AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
v 21 12-56A98
08/30/88
210.00
AVR INC
REPAIR PARTS
---- - - - - --
BACH -BILL
3. 256A98
08/30/88
_ - 482.50 -__
AVR
CONCRETE_
BACH -BILL
ESGA98
06/30/88
210.20
_INC
AVR INC
_ _ _ _
CONCRETE --
'i1'l 1,351.75 *
'1 256A99 09/02/88 - - - -- 39.94 AXT -LYLE
4p, 3 39.94 *
b'
COST OF GOODS SOLD
256B03 09/02/88 15.95. B. R. _BENSON UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
'' 256:03 08/26/88 38.57 B R. BENSON LAUNDRY
v 14 256:03 08/26/88 37.10 B. R. BENSON LAUNDRY
09 -12 -88 _ 11
ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE
10- 4540 - 390 -30 85686
40 -4528- 8_03 -80 85449
40 -4528- 803 -60 85621
29-
10- 4262 - 301 -30 01498
f0- 4262 - 301 -30 26357
10- 4262 - 301 -30 26980
I,e
08/22/88
2,462.13
BEER WHOLESALERS
INVENTORY
27- 4630 - 663 -66 -1�
256822,._____08
/22/88
1 575.15
BEER WHOLESALERS
INVENTORY
,=
50-4630 - 842 -84 "
"
4,037.28 *
-----------
i_.256B05
- --
08/26/88
- - -- - --
63.01
---- - - - - --
BACH -BILL
— - -
POSTAGE
30- 4290-781 -T8
w/'- 256B05
08/26/80
29.26
BACH -BILL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30-4504 - 781 -78
2' E56B05
f.,,
08/26/88 _
62.38
_BACH_ -BILL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 -_ 782-7_8
1-i256B05
0 8/26/88
59.81
BACH -BILL
OFFICE SUPPLIES
30- 4516 - 781 -78
A1,'31256B05
06/26/88
15.44
BACH -BILL
PAINT
30-4544- 782 -78
l` - -- - - -- 229_90 #
1-
112561)07 08/22/88 189.40 BADGER METER INC
"o
.,1 189.40 s
1,
d
"
B56813 0 01 ENGINEERING
' 729.00
� * - - -- - --
WATER METERS
_PROP SERVICES
40- 1220 - 000 -00
10- 4201 - 302 -30
,
I' e I-
D
,0
'2
* ** -CKS ,
h3
a
I, e i
,n
;n
,e
�tv i
- - -- — '2
*#* -CKS 122
13,
** *-CKS 13:
_ 3n
3i
13C
I3G
_ 4C
*� -CKS 141
*** -CKS
d:i256B22
08/22/88
2,462.13
BEER WHOLESALERS
INVENTORY
27- 4630 - 663 -66 -1�
256822,._____08
/22/88
1 575.15
BEER WHOLESALERS
INVENTORY
,=
50-4630 - 842 -84 "
"
4,037.28 *
—
'3
S
_ ** ** * #-- -
- ---- - --
- --
—
#* *-CKS n
4pl, 256B27
09/06/88
191.50
BERGFORD TRUCKING
—
INVENTORY
5]
50- 4626 - 822 -82 'n
4, 256827
08/30/88
192.01
BERGFORD TRUCKING
INVENTORY
50- 4626- 822 -82 59L
256:27
256827
08/30/88
09/06/88
_
— 393.50 -
366.50
BERGFORD TRUCKING
BERGFORD TRUCKING
— INVENTORY-
INVENTORY
50 =4626= 842 =84 - —_;ao
c,
50- 4626- 842 -84 e2
4 ^- 256827
08/30/88
370.50
BERGFORD TRUCKING
INVENTORY
50- 4626 - 862 -86 630
«;256827 09%06%88 2 674:00 BERGFORD —TRUCKING— INVENTOR 0ib =862=8 bs
ttil.,l
I TT8.01
- ev
*** -CKS
h _I
hc
x''!2 56830
1256:30
09/06/88
08/30/88
76.80
72.48
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
7,
10 -4504- 180 -18 400654 72
10-4504- 420 -42 397228 73
'
d`j256830
09/06/68
71.96
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10-4504- 510 -51 401025 6780 7e�
,�
1988 CITY OF EDINA
C_
rwr:Ew wn nsrF swMiwT
i
L
L
11
CHECK REGISTER 09 -12 -88 PAGE 10
VPNnnD 1TPU nwaraTDT7nu Arrn11YT un fuu A 0 n m uCQQAEC-
1
,
2
3
315.13 +
2
3
4
ssssss
+ ++ -CKS
'
e
0
e66A41
08/eeiee
71.910
AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE
CONCESSIONS
26 -4624- 683 -68
7
e
7
256441
08/26/88
35.60
AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
26- 4624 - 683 -68
408659
9
°
256A41
09/02/88
418.26
AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE
CONCESSIONS
27 -4624- 663 -66
3741
10
D
_.eS6A41____08/22/88___.____
337.87
AMBAS.SADOR_SAUSAGE—
CONCESSIONS
e7 -462= 663 -66
't
12
13
10
256A41 09/02/88 183.54 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE CONCESSIONS 27 -46 :4- 663 -66
11
E56A41
08/22/88
473.92
AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE
CONCESSIONS
27 -4624- 663 -66
1e
12
1 520.39 +
,e
13
,4i ••• #•+
••# -CKS
,D
-� - --- - -' - --
20
6 e56A49
09/06/88
364.48
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
E7- 4E6E- 663 -66
21
7
:e
364.48 s
22
23
24
!D; •• #•••
201
•• +-CKS
25
26
21'856ASI
08/30_/80
2e0.00
AMERICAN RED CROSS
REGISTRATION PEES
10- 4504 - 685 -6e
27
ze
z2
e56A51
08/30/08
68.40
AMERICAN RED CROSS
GENERAL SUPPLY
f0- 4504- 6E5_–&2__0_"
8
23
24
288.40 +
30
1
3
25� +• #• #•
•••–
33
261
2]LP56A53
08/30/88
te6_66
AMERICAN SMARECOM
TELEPHONE
10-4256 - 510 -51
35
3e
'0;
.zv
126.66 s
37
38
30
# # ##••
••• -CKS
3D
eo
JI
321256A6e
0910e/88
3eeSS.40
ANDERSON –TODD
PROP SERVICES
10-4e01- 630 -68
a!
42
331
328.40 #
43
as
"m
J6�
# ## # #+
#•• -CKS
.
ae
47
49
"
E56A80
08/E3/86
21.04
ABTLEFORD INTL
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
47906
49
38
21.04 t
50
-
401 004..4.4.
41i
### –CKS
53
64
a2'e56A94
_
09 /OE /8S
366.85
AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS
REPAIR PARTS
40-4540-804 -60
14545 6597
55
5e
43:
366.85 t
57
44
'
SB
45 • * ±0••
••• -CKS
eD
60
46
a7Ie56A96
f(
08/22/88
4E.95
AUTOMOBILE SERV CTR
CONTRACTED REPAIR
10-4248- 560 -56
98548 638E
6,
62
42.95 s
e3
64
t0�
65
5-'tti #t#
5,
#ts -CKS •e]
,
a —'*4 —�
.E�
52 X56 ;90
53
06430a88
188 50-
AUR INC
CONCt1iT°
E T E
-4 fla 4
1- 0528— r'si —'r'r
B5 or9
e,
70
34 E56A98
08/23/88
165.10
AVR INC
CONCRETE
10- 4528 - 301 -30
65015
1
7z
55 256A98�870
-T8
C
- - -
b0'
]3
56 BSGA98
57
08/30/88
165.10
AYR INC
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 301 -30
85199
74
75
I' 1988 Cl,
EDINA
268.35
-` CHECK RE
°
10- 4504 - 260 -26
50- 420.1- 8EO -82
17•
°
08/E6/88
50 -4201- 820 -8E
CHECK N0.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
0
50 -4E01 - 8E0_ -
,_
1 •
_82
50 -4E01 - 840 -84 - -- --
-- 13
485065
50 -4E01- 840 -84
4,248.74 •
26.40
256A10
09/06/88
909.56
ACCOUNTEMPS
]
50-4201 - 860 -86
ALBINSON
9v 1E56Af0
08/22/88
456.23
ACCOUNTEMPS
1 256A10_- _09/06/88
89.05
154_00
ACCOUNTEMPS
I]i256A10
09/06/86
154.00
ACCOUNTEMPS
@di "I2S6A10
08 /9E /88
124.16
ACCOUNTEMPS
490057
154.00_- ____-
.A000UNTEMP3______
"iE36A10
08 /EE /88
1E4.16
ACCOUNTEMPS
,,W !E56A10
09/06/88
154.00
ACCOUNTEMPS
E56A1 0 - -_
09/06/89
_ _154._00
ACCOUNTEMPS
t56A10
08 /et /88
154.00
ACCOUNTEMPS
1W '. t56AI0
09/06/88
154.00
ACCOUNTEMPS
51 t56A10 ---- ----
OB /EE /88
124.1T______AC000NTEMP9
-
6It36A10
00/11/08
134.00
_ __
ACCOUNTCMP3
10�,
t36A10
09/06/88
154.00
ACCOUNTEMPS
f. - -------
- - - - --
- -- 3,124.28 +
I
,,w, 256A11
08 /E3 /BS
73.47
ACE SUPPLY
-Z1 -- - -- --
- -- -----
73 47 +
- - - -
=
f i,"
-- -
-
=R 09 -12 -88 9
ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 8 P.O. R MESSAGE
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4201- 800 -80
I5
268.35
40 -4201- 800 -80
°
10- 4504 - 260 -26
50- 420.1- 8EO -82
17•
°
08/E6/88
50 -4201- 820 -8E
9
GENERAL SUPPLIES
50- 4E01- BEO -BE
48573E 648E
0
50 -4E01 - 8E0_ -
,_
1 •
_82
50 -4E01 - 840 -84 - -- --
-- 13
485065
50 -4E01- 840 -84
14
26.40
50 -4E01- 8_40 -84
,e
10- 4604- E60 -E6
_
50 -4201- 840 -84
]
50-4201 - 860 -86
ALBINSON
CREDIT
50 -4EOI- 860 -86
9EEEE4
I_E56AE9___
] E56AE9
30-4101- 860 -80
50- 4E01- 660 -86
10-4S40- 520 -52 53133 6480
) t + + + ++ + ++ -CKS x
-., 3,
256A19 08/2E/88 328.50 ADVON LAUNDRY 30- 4E6P- 78E -18 980565 31 32
328.50 + 34
35
leS6AE1 OB/E6/68 175.63 ADT SECURITY SYS.
I. i - - - -- - - - - - - -- -- 175.83 + - --
= E56A22 - __09 /OE /88_ -- 131_.50 _- AIR COMFORT -INC_-
"; 131 .50 •
d'
+ ++ +++
W *•LAC
PROF SERVICES 30 -4E01- 782 -78 735450
CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 540 -54 3l9-S6--53S9------- -
+ ++ -CKS
i256A29
06/22/86
268.35
ALBINSON
GENERAL SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 260 -26
486976
..E56AE9
08/E6/88
.___- ___67.30
_ ALBINSON
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10-45_04- 646 -64
48573E 648E
E56AE9
d "
08 /EE /B8
150.10
ALBINSON
BLUE PRINTING
10- 4570- E60 -Eb
485065
E56A99
09/06/88
26.40
ALBINSON
LUMBER
10- 4604- E60 -E6
49005E
08/E2/88_ _
_87.5_0-
ALBINSON
CREDIT
10- 4604- E60 -E6
9EEEE4
I_E56AE9___
] E56AE9
08/E9/8a
89.05
_
ALBINSON
LUMBER
0 =4304= 980 =t6
X85004
S '1856AE9
09/06/86
111.07
ALBINSON
LUMBER
10- 4604 - 260 -E6
490057
E56AE9-
_ - 09/09/88
- - -
459.00
- - - -1
ALBINSON
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4909 - 260 -26
489261
, 083 . T7 s -
-- --
-- -
256A30 08/26/88 28.00 ALFONS ANDERSON
COST OF GOODS SOLD
w'
256A39
08/26/88
21.60
ALTERNATOR
REBUILD
REPAIR PARTS
1.256A39
08/22/88
68_00_
ALTERNATOR
REBUILD
REPAIR PARTS
"1256A39
06/22/86
131.96
ALTERNATOR
REBUILD
TOOLS
256A39
08/82/88
93.57
ALTERNATOR
REBUILD
REPAIR PARTS
s
ET- 4630 - 663 -66 3745
+•+ -CKS
10- 4640 - 620 -62 1686
10- 4540 - 560 -56 11378 6412
10- 4580 - 560 -S6 ISSS
40- 4540 - 801 -80 1583
a
a:
a:
141
q!
-4s
5i
53
54
5s
5]
150
159
- -,60
61
4
' 1988 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
- -
- - - - -- - -- - - -- - - -- - - - --
09 -12 -88 PAGE 8
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. N MESSAGE
�z
I�
256821
09/06/88
_ __ 15.00
_ MN CTY_ATTORNEY___ -_ _.BOOKS
-__, -- _ --
10- 4502- 420 -42
3
I
15.00
•
°
I
es66ee
09/06/6$
6e.50
MPH INDUSTRIES
COUIP MAINT
10- 4e74- 4e0 -4e
39799
7
°
256822
09/06/88
62.50
MPH INDUSTRIES
EQUIP MAINT
10 -4274- 420 -42
34797
0
OI
256822
09/06/88
86.90
MPH INDUSTRIES
EQUIP MAINT
10-4274- 420 -42
39798
'
I141
"j 256823
09/06/88
105.00
THE PLAYWRIGHTS CTR
SALARY REG EMP
10- 4105- 6eT -6e
lie
-
- -- - -
- - -- 1 05 _00_-•
le
n
" 256824
09/06/88
25.00
SUE BLAIR
PROF SERV OTHER
30- 4224 - 781 -78
°
o
25.00
+
20
17ie568e5
09/06/88
e5.00
ELIZ HOOD ANDERSON
PROF SERV OTHER
30-4ee4- 781 -78
X234
_ ___ - -_ - ____-
__-- _------
25.00
_.- _-- - -__ --
*
_
-
24
.. 256$26
09/06/$8
25.00
PHYLLIS HAYWA
PROF SERV OTHER
30 -4224- 781 -7$
,23
12fi
127
00_
•
Ito
!`_ - --
- -
- - - --
7. e56827
09/06/88
25.00
MARGARET GUST
PROF SERV OTHER
30 -4284- 781 -78
31
I
25_00
•
e568e8
09/06/88
e5.00
HELEN ZABEL
PROF SERV OTHER
30-4ee4- 781 -78
3`f
3i
h
!-
25.00
•
3'
eS6829
09/06/88
161.00
MSHS
PLANTINGS & TREES
10- 4560- 644 -64
38
161.00
•
40
!..-- - ---- ---
---- -- -
- -- -- ---- --- - ---
-
14i
e56830
09/06/88
17.70
POLICE -PETTY CASH
CABLE TV
10 -e149- 000 -00
4�V
'43
I 256830
09/06/88
91.19
POLICE- PETTY_ CASH _
ME_TING_EXPE_NSE
10 -4206- 420 -42
--
41
-
-45
256830
09/06/88
97.02
_
POLICE -PETTY CASH
MILEAGE
10 -4208- 480 -42
- 1256830
09/06/88
187.80
POLICE -PETTY CASH
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42
46
4]
256830
09/06/88
99.10
POLICE -PETTY CASH
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42
492.81
*
4fl
SO
'I
~� e56831
09/06/88 -_
_ _ -- -- 225.00
-_ GFOA /ESC _
CONF 8 SCHOOLS
10-420e- 160 -16
- 57.
_
225.00
•
�4
..f
e5683e
09/06/68
3e.ee
AUTO FONE BERV CTR
EQUIP MAINT
10-4e74- 4e0 -4e
7630
a°
Dept._of Pro2ertx Tax & Public Rec.
°o-
" 256833
09/06/88
134.10
POSTAGE _- _ --
-
14 0 -1 4
10- 4290 - 140 -14
- - -- - - -- - -
- e
-- 7 -
_
1 34.1 0
•
d
12
-
i'-L- 256834
09/06/88_
7_0_.0_0
MN CITY MANAGEMENT
DUES
10- 4204 - 140 -14
d3
64
�.
- - - -
- _ -_-
70.00
•
I �
fifi
v,
e56835
09/06/88
25.00
GOVT TRAINING SERV
CONF b SCHOOL
10 -4202- 100 -10
-- ---- -- - -
-- ---- - - - - --
--- -e9
c;.I
25.00
•
-o
# # #-CKS
7
72
►.,,IS'!256AO9
08/23/88
4,248.74
AAA
LICENSES 6 PERMITS
10-4310 - 560 -56
;s
�q:a
1988 zI
EDINA
CHECK RE
ER
09 -12 -88 _ 7
J
CHECK N0.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O.
M MESSAGE
.j2 III
i
318.06 +
256805
09/06/88
4,402.35
FLANAGAN SALES
ACCT RECEIVABLE
10 -1139- 000 -00
3294
6403
AI
09/06/88
2,884.00
FLANAGAN SALES
GENERAL SUPPLY
10- 4504- 647 -64
3126
5557
1256805
h
j
-- .-- -----
- -_ - -- _286_35 •
_ --
Q1 "256606
09/06/68
123.40
ARTHUR LINDMAN
AMBULANCE
10 -3180- 000 -00
of
-- -- ---- -- -- --
- --- - - - - --
- - -- - - - -1- 23._40_ !-- --
---- - - - -'—
______ _
256807
09/06/88
175,057.00
EDINA FIRE DEPT
POLICE AID 1%
10 -3311- 000 -00
175,057_00 +
I
",256808
09/06/88
29.85
PLAN TO GET OUT ALIVE
FIRE PREVENTION
10 -4650- 440 -44
- -- - - - --- -- -- - - --
- - - - -- - -- - -- —..
- - -- - - -89 eS.. '------
115
-,
---------- - - -
---
-
0''i LIS6809
09/06/86
14.00
JON HOBBS
DUE FROM HRA
10 -1145- 000 -00
- - --
— 14.00 +
-
0I'- =`256810
09/06/88
25.00
MN POLICE CHIEFS
ADVERTISING
23- 4214 - 611 -61
20638
z
I-
S,`'256811
09/06/68
25.11 -
WEIS AM FIRE EQUIP
CREDIT
10- 4540- 440 -44
01579
z.! 256811
09/06/88
2,141.46_
WEI8 AM FIRE EQUIP
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 440 -44
6595
I' 256811
-
09/06/88
1,655.10
WEIS AM FIRE EQUIP
EQUIP REPLACE
10-4901 - 440 -44
30965
5694
d "
3,771.45 +
256812
09/06/86
794.00
SPECIALTY EQUIP
EQUIP REPLACE
10- 4901- 440 -44
71811
6467
A! �,
794.00 +
256813
09/06/88 -
1,472.50
C 6-W TURF NURSERY
800 b BLACK DIRT
E7 -4562- 664 -66
2766
6723
1,472.50 +
256814
09/06/88
126.11
MILDRED LARSON
AMBULANCE
10 -3180- 000 -00
126.11 +
- --
e56815
- - o9p,9610,88 - - -
-- e. oe
OLD
PR OF SERVIOES
eT 4eOl - 654 -55-
iE56815_._- „____09/08/88__
e.00
ROGER HARROLD
ROGER HARROLD
PROP SERYIGES
PROF SERVICES
el -66
E7 -4201- 664 -66
^= !E56816 -
.,i - - --
09/06/88
- --
64._00
ROBERT LINDNER
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
40 -4248- 800 -80
64.00 +
256617_ _
09/06/88_ -
_117.50
CTR FOR DESIGN TECH
SCHOOL
10 -4202- 440 -44
7682
6468
<c E56817
09/06/88
117.50
CTR FOR DESIGN TECH
SCHOOL
0=4202 = 490 =49 -7682
—6468
--
•r l— 235.00 +
1256818 09/06/88 905.00 UNIQUE INSTALLATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 440 -44 132 6205
S 905.00 +
256819 09/06/88 1,800.00 IMPULSE CONCEPT INC CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10-4E48- 646 -64 2086 -8 6703
® °I 1,800.00 +
=1256820 09/06/86 58.20 8T. PAUL CANDY CONCESSIONS 27-4624- 663 -66 219807
a
9
10
„
,z
u
u
n
. iaS
�5c
00
e0
co
at
-i
! 1988 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
09 -1e -88 PAGE 6
CHECK N0.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. N MESSAGE
11 .00 s
�: .
e56786
08/30/88
146.00
TRUSTEE MPTF
PROF SERV OTHER
I,
30- 4224 - 781 -78
146.00 •
ie
i256787
-
08/30/88
- - --
50.00
e
AMY ANDERSON
PROF SERVICES
30 -4201- 781 -78
e
50.00 •
256788
08/30/88
616.00
VALLEY PAVING
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
40 -4e48- 800 -80
- -
:3
i•;
616.00 •
is
'i 856789
09!01!811
•
49.45-
°
BOOtf$
O�tSOr •wn a�
,7
Iie
ROWER RHONE
BOOKS
tsOg>gg�gg_
256789
06/30/88
- -- - 49.45
POWER PHONE
- --
BOOKS
10- 4502 - 420 -42
°
49.45 •
- -- --
-- - -
-- �z i
e56790
08/30/88
- -- -
11.50_
-- -- -- - - - -1 -
BRUNER
- -- --
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 - 78
zz
23.
1 .50 s
211
23
251,791 _ -_ ____08/30/88
_ _-
- 226._67 _
ASCAP- _ --
- - --
DUES
2S- 4204 - 701 -70
2G
27 V
226.67 4-
----
- - - - -- -
- - - -
- --
ze
256792
_ 08/30/88
_ e78.60
DAVID VELDE
CONFERENCE
10 -420e- 480 -48
30
2 56792
69/01!88
278.60-
DAVID VELDE
CONFERENCE
- - 2=4[;0 8
3 ^
256793
08/30/88
e4.32
HUDSON PHOTO INDUST
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -Tg__3
6
i3-
"I
32 .
24 s
�3n L
' 256794
OS 730/88
E50.00
YOUR SPECIAL EVENT
ADVERTISING
30- 4e14 -7 781 =78
aglC
250.00 s
ac
a.
143
•��sy•
- --
-- - --
ivM-CK9
" 256797 -
- 09/06/88
RIEKE CARROLL MULLER
SERVICES
40 -4201- 800 -80
1089
148
a7
_292.50
292.50 =
a°
256798 __-
09/06/88 -
- - -- 724_.91
-y --
SEH
- --
SERVICES
40 -4e01- 800 -80
e630
sc
'51
724.91
- - - -- -
- - - -- - - --
- - - - - --
- - - --
�:
.
256799
09/06/88
- -- ee.00
BETTER CARE MED
FIRST AID SUPPLY
10- 4510- 440 -44
114289
22.00 s
57
1;,256800-
09/06/88
70.43 -
FRANCIS CALLAHAN
- -- - - - --
MILEAGE
10- 4208 - 480 -48
70.43 s
-- - _ _
1112
1°°1256801
-- - --
09/06/88
-- - - --
5,6_ 33.12
HARDRIVES INC.
PAYMENT
60 -2040- 000 -00
1
l.3
i
-
.
- 5,637 1L s
- --
Ga
IG:
n9
256802
09/06/88
61.75
MN AUTO DAMAGE
--
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 560 -56
42160
G7`
61.75 +
- -
--
256803
09/06/88
- - - - --
UNDERGROUND PIERCING
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
10-4248- 390 -30
500594
70
71
sI
171 .66 *
-
72
7.,
,7 256904
09/06/88
318.06
GTE SUN COMM DIRECT
ADVERTISING
23 -4214- 611 -61
74
75
1988,CI
EDINA
CHECK RE
ER
09 -12 -88
1`= 25678008/30/88
- -
- -- - - _-
25.20
ED GLANDER
MILEAGE
40- 4208 - 806 -80
1.,
CHECK_N_0_DATE
-_
-
VENDOR
_- —_ --
ITEM DESCRIPTION
__ - --
ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. •
--AMOUNT
-__ - -.
�2
%r qtr ��G
DO LG9 LGG
n ,BS4 00
08/30/88
KERRI DAHLSTROM
SUP nn
GENERAL , 6Y
10 4504 647 64 3ie6 555
' 256770
08/30/88
_ 200.00
KERRI DAHLSTROM
RENTAL INCOME
30 -3507- 000 -00
-_
X1'7
200.00
�
- ------- ----
- - - - -- -
E!'I
,1256782
08/30/88
219.84
KAPAK CORP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42 39309
e
219:84 »
TVIeI2S6771
08/30/88
44.00
AMER RED CROSS
SCHOOL
30- 420E - 781 -78
- - --
.._ -- -
-- - -- - - -_44 -00
o - -
-
S i 1256784
08/30/88
--
MICHAEL 8IITARI
-10 ',256772
08/30/88
103.13
SCHWAB VOLLHASER
HEAT
10 -4254- 630 -62 1104
-
-- -
- - - -- --
256785
- - - - -- -
- E P EV
0- 465-0- 444 -44-
PROF SERV OTHER
30-4224 - 781 -78
RE- PREVENT -ION
1 -0- _4650- 440-44
103.13
s
. ., 2
BtrtkN-
io `3+80 -000 00
e! '� �B677a
I"
111:41
N ! P—A
AMBULANCE
256773
- - - --
08!30/80
- -
— _44.25_
N. F. P. A.
BOOKS 6 PAMPHLETS
10-4502- 440 -44 98479
44.25
+
v:r,
R4i*R*
-
- d-
3i256T75
2 1
08/30/88
422.60
HENN CTY COMM HEALTH
SUPPLIES
10- 4510- 440 -44
e3 42i.
- - --
- --
-- -- -
—
44- 6-i-+ -61 - 06.38-
40
- - -- 422.60
+-----------
- - - - -- --- - - - - --
—_ – - --
-3 31 -F-00 0- 0 0
L -r C E-A I D-1-Y.
i�0 ;E56776
08/30/88
154.01
TRIGG IND INC
LUMBER
10-4604- 260 -E6 3304 6565
154.01
s
256777 _ _
08/30/86
_ _ 34,977.0_0_
PRO TRUCKS__
EQUIP REPLACEMENT
10-49_01- 305 -30
"1L56TTT
08/30/88
9
34,77.00
PRO TRUCKS
E-QUIP REPLACEMENT
10- 4901- 30°� -30
•II' "I
4
69,954.00
•
MESSAGE
#ws -CKS
11
2
e
17
e
9
10
11
113
14
113
121
122
123
41
42
<n
256778 08/30/88 41.95 GFOA BOOKS 10- 4502 - 160 -16
I
4:f •lI
1 ssex *+
1`= 25678008/30/88
- -
- -- - - _-
25.20
ED GLANDER
MILEAGE
40- 4208 - 806 -80
1.,
25.20 •
-
-
256761
08/30/88
30.00
VASA JR FOLK DANCERS
PROF SERVICES
30- 4201 - 781 -78
r
30.00
- -- - -
-
-_
X1'7
,1256782
08/30/88
219.84
KAPAK CORP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42 39309
219:84 »
�''� •ss•s�
S i 1256784
08/30/88
139.74
MICHAEL 8IITARI
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
10- 4266- 420 -42
139.74 •
17
256785
08/30/88
11.00
TC MUSICIANS UNION
PROF SERV OTHER
30-4224 - 781 -78
r
Pti-
«0• —CKS
�4
I,.
a
' 1988 c/ry OF so/wA
,
CHECK mo.DAIE.__-
^/emarsa 08/30/88
" es6756 oa,so/oa
.^/
.'.
-
AMOUNT
.. | es- or-o -_-__o e-;i v-___-----
/=.
-- -'- ---
e96761 0e^30,88
cxsxx ecnxarsn
vsmuon
_
leso vyeoCOOTIES oowv
1e.50 -.----1Vo9cuurIsa-Cuwx---
srso ~
ee. so
ee.so--
ee.so
,e.s°
--_'1 e, so.
,ea*
srso *
1'rsw.00
1'7s*.ou *
is 9 --i —e-
689.0e *
-------- ---'
48.60
*o.wo *
ITEM-DESCRIPTION AnCouwr NO. xwv
AovsnrImIwn so-4el4-e4e-84
__Mw JAYCEES *nvem`wxww
MN J*Ycsso AnvseTxnIww
v*rmnL,v ^wwu«L ^mvznrImIww
CATHOLIC ANNUAL ADVERTISING
50-*e14-86e-86
50-4=l4-wec-8e
sw-*ei4-8*e-e4
r^M*n^nw
°"VLmr;5x
-412,e-
---'-----'-------------
vy-,e-ou pAos ^
w P.O. w mcoaAns
� ,o.nn * _ --_ ~.
.~.�.~ .~
'Z7 - - .- -_- -___---' _-___-_---_----
csarao 06r30/88 489.0 0 unw rsn i ��------'
�. *oy.wo * - -' '-- '- --
esara^ om/ o/ oo esej0 0 PC MAINTENANCE
� 252.00 * ---'-- -----'- 10-4~08-t10-=1 "~P-"
�` - ----
/ `'eyaras 08/3*/88- -- --686.�07 ------- DAN -9 - JOHNSON --------CONTRACTED REPAIRS my
~ aoa.or * --
eso7aa ow,so,00 e4. ---- B�-C it i P-T-1 0 N w
--' '--'- REPAIR
8961!6:p 61 .75
�
�2567*7 06^30/88 108.00 rnwwx mwmxL owIm wwp
pn*�
o
�'--'' ~`-"~''-"°°-°
� >
' . 1as6768 08/30/88 19.00 LINDA u000urnom nsoIarn»rInm rcsa 10-3sow-000-00
"
"
,
"
"
..
"
"
"
'^
"
..
1 25
318 06- i vmnA
ADVER
i�. ,n.00
57 e56769 - 08,36/867 -- --- ---�� ��----�-'�m��'disrfo�'-----'-' - s41o7 1 N
7.
' Sy*7w7
ww/o*/ww
/ esarsr ----
om^so^ow -------
| esaysr
'
08/30/86
|
=
'� esorso
om,so,wm
= esa75m_____08/3u/a8________
' m5675e
`.
08,30^88
�-
|�
.,
eyar5 o
./
- - ---
0m,uo /so
.. | es- or-o -_-__o e-;i v-___-----
/=.
-- -'- ---
e96761 0e^30,88
cxsxx ecnxarsn
vsmuon
_
leso vyeoCOOTIES oowv
1e.50 -.----1Vo9cuurIsa-Cuwx---
srso ~
ee. so
ee.so--
ee.so
,e.s°
--_'1 e, so.
,ea*
srso *
1'rsw.00
1'7s*.ou *
is 9 --i —e-
689.0e *
-------- ---'
48.60
*o.wo *
ITEM-DESCRIPTION AnCouwr NO. xwv
AovsnrImIwn so-4el4-e4e-84
__Mw JAYCEES *nvem`wxww
MN J*Ycsso AnvseTxnIww
v*rmnL,v ^wwu«L ^mvznrImIww
CATHOLIC ANNUAL ADVERTISING
50-*e14-86e-86
50-4=l4-wec-8e
sw-*ei4-8*e-e4
r^M*n^nw
°"VLmr;5x
-412,e-
---'-----'-------------
vy-,e-ou pAos ^
w P.O. w mcoaAns
� ,o.nn * _ --_ ~.
.~.�.~ .~
'Z7 - - .- -_- -___---' _-___-_---_----
csarao 06r30/88 489.0 0 unw rsn i ��------'
�. *oy.wo * - -' '-- '- --
esara^ om/ o/ oo esej0 0 PC MAINTENANCE
� 252.00 * ---'-- -----'- 10-4~08-t10-=1 "~P-"
�` - ----
/ `'eyaras 08/3*/88- -- --686.�07 ------- DAN -9 - JOHNSON --------CONTRACTED REPAIRS my
~ aoa.or * --
eso7aa ow,so,00 e4. ---- B�-C it i P-T-1 0 N w
--' '--'- REPAIR
8961!6:p 61 .75
�
�2567*7 06^30/88 108.00 rnwwx mwmxL owIm wwp
pn*�
o
�'--'' ~`-"~''-"°°-°
� >
' . 1as6768 08/30/88 19.00 LINDA u000urnom nsoIarn»rInm rcsa 10-3sow-000-00
"
"
,
"
"
..
"
"
"
'^
"
..
1 25
318 06- i vmnA
ADVER
i�. ,n.00
57 e56769 - 08,36/867 -- --- ---�� ��----�-'�m��'disrfo�'-----'-' - s41o7 1 N
7.
1988 •CI F EDINA CHECK RE ER
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR
SCRIPTION
09 -12 -88
ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE
2
256737 08/$2/88 __- 148.24._ RON _WAY _— GENERAL SUPPLY __— 10- 4504- 621 -62
4 - -- 148.24 s - - - - - - --
IE1256736 _Oe /22 /8A 127.20 CF DALLMAN CO CONSTRUCTION 60- 1300- OBS -22
Ia1 127.20 » — --
i
°1 _256739 __ 08/22/88. ___. _ 20 .50____,___INTERNATL_- CONF` BOOKS__— 10-4502-490-49
�'�I 20.50 s - - - - --
I_
i3
"I.
I�
4
a
n
5
s
3
s
'e
I7
le
°
fo
I"
1:
'I 3
' I
I4
' 256740_
08/22/88____
55_36
CYBEX
GENERAL SUPPLY
30- 4504 - 783 -78
167345 6284
e
fe
55.36
»
—
:7
fe
256741
08/23/88`
- -- 132 ._Q0,__,_
—_ALL
AM MECH_I_NC
PLUMBING PERMIT
10 -3110- 000 -00
2O
0
132.00
•
--
':1
33
256742
00/23/88—
285.00
SHARE
AMBULANCE
10-3180- 000 -00
1Z;
--
-
285.00
»
z4
256743__
_08/23/88
4e, 40
TOM TOTALL __
—
- -- EQUIPMENT RENTAL
10 -4226- 301 -30
za
zi
3,
42.40
•
- -m
» » » -CKS
3z
,256746
08/30/86
59.63
BARB PETERSON
MILEAGE
30 -4208- 781 -78
133
3e
37
11256747
06/30/88
79.20
ROORDA SALES
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540- 664 -66
5279
13
— - -- —
-- - - - --
79.20
»
139
40
141
256748
08/30/88
72.00
JL ENTERPRISES
CRAFT SUPPLIES
23 -4588- 611 -61
0948 6332
142
al
0±
_
—_ --
--
—
43
as
—'
''1256749
08/30/88
280.00
SHARON HALE
DONATIONS
23 -3265- 000 -00
45
.4e
260 .00
»
_—
1 '47 47
' 256750
08/30/88
29.57
HARRIETTE BACH
DUES
23 -4204- 611 -61
4°
50
�t - -- - - -
- -- -- - - - -
- -- e9.57
0
•552
I
'1256751
08/30/88
114.75
LYNN ANDERSON
MILEAGE
10 -4208- 600 -60
154
'i
114.75
»
73'
256752
08/30/68
74.00
ISIA
SERVICES
26- 4201 - 701 -70
018266 6394
S7
59
I— -- ---
- - - - --
— 74.00
»
6D'
7 256753
08/30/88
150.00
DALLAS BRASS
PROF SERV OTHER
30 -4224- 781 -78
e1
ez
--
150.00
•
63'
I64
01256754
08/30/88
847.66
SONIC SYSTEM
GENERAL SUPPLY
10 -4504- 440 -44
684307 6196
65
lee
1
847.56
0
67'
256755
08/30/88
24.30
LYNNE PEISSIG
MILEAGE
10- 4208 - 600 -60
7O
"r
24_30
»
;z
73
' C56756
7
08/30/66
12.90
1969, COOTIES CONY
ADVERTISING
50- 4214 - 622 -62
74
-- - " - -
-- —`-
_ -- 74
' 0e-1e-6e p^os c
/. 1986 CITY OF smIw« cosCw nsGzerso
] ""="" NO DATE x*ouwr wcwnoo xrsw nsaneIprxow xwowumr mw. xwv. w P.O. w msae^os
|
',=�_--__-
.^ 2S6710
-- o8/22/88
_----_TS-O0__--_
STEVE- GORES_ -_-_---___PROF'�[8y_OTHER
.
rs.00
*
`
6/aq6?j9ow/ea/ow
`@�ANDmm^
wrEwm
pmmr wsm, nromm
30-48m4-761-78
|`/
75.00
~
/^.
' es67e0
on/me/ou
-e42.00
' _ __LAIws omvns' - -
__paupysov OTHER
o�*2e*-781-78
__-_---
�
ow �*�
~
csa?e!__'---�m^������se`
�r�
30-*e r , rm
roc.uo
~
".
e5672e
wo/ee/oe _
ss`00
TWIN CITIES
PROF_SER
n aew 7w1 7m
'~
L|
ss . wo
*
|'leyoren
*m,ea,mw
100.0*
LORI wworwnm
pnnp wsnv orxsn
�
30-+em*-781-78
.' -_--__---___--_'-_-_____----100.0
esa7a*_
wexaa/mo___--2w.97
-
ousm
- -
�m *eo^ �mo-�*
|=�
,
e9.97
*
'
171
9.44
1es67e8
om^eo^mw
177-30
nwom s orxro CO
nsp^xn pAm`w
10-4s40-560-m6
30560
'
__-'_-----_-1I?'
n�w�mn
ww,e�,w�
�,.��
oLmwr LIwnLcww
osrAIn p«mro
1*-4s*0-520-s2
ms93
|/
-41.73
��__-_-_-_'_--__'----------_---___-_-_---
-
~�
SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540-560-56
7ES09
3c�es6731
08/ea/se
35.34
SNAP-ON-TOOLS CORP
TOOLS
40-4SBO-801-80
e6665
!"IBS6732
08/22/88
e9o.00
SIR SPEEDY PRINT
GENERAL SUPPLY
10-4504-314-30
31460
��125673e
08/ea/as
eas.00
SIR SPEEDY PRINT
GENERAL SUPPLY
10-4504-3E5-30
315EE
E56733
08/22/88
90.00
CY TURNSLADH
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
e3-4248-612-61
..
` e56734 no/ee/ow 50.00 rom pnzw CONTRACTUAL asnvICsw 30-4ee4-781-78
-----_50`00-��-_-__---_--__-__-_'___--
|,
~^
12
4
"
'^
a°oo |^
1
6237 55
o 14
''
"
~
e
e
C
e
C
C
t
c
d
1�
e
�e
e
d
1988 cI"
EDINA
CHECK RE
ER
09 -12 -88 _ t
lr\
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. R P.O. 0 MESSAGE
2
255C51
08/22/88
670.60
COMM OF REVENUE
GASOLINE
10- 4612 - 560 -56
1
2
4
'
•0000•
*0• -CKS
6
e
7256702
08/22/88
40.00
MILLER POWER EOUIP
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
e7 -4248- 664 -66
9
6
40.00
*
9
11
1O
e56703
08/22/88
31.62
TARGET
GENERAL SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 661 -66
,3
�"
,z
31.62
•
'a
,e
,e
3
256704
08 /ee /88
1,387.00
BUSINESSLAND
SERVICE CONTRACT
10- 4288 - 510 -51
1147e 6463
17
^1 °I
256704
08 /ee /88
700.00
BUSINESSLAND
SERVICE CONTRACT
10- 4288 - 510 -51
11473 6463
16
"
e56Z0-4
0- 8- 4ee%98—
4- L29Q__ .
BUSINESSLAND
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
e5- 4906 - 510 -5/
57002 6446
19
20
6,377.00
•
21
22
°
7
6
e56705
08 /e2 /88
174.e7
KORTUEM SALES
REPAIR PARTS
e7- 4540- 666 -66
4892
23
2a
zoI
174.27
•
25
26
2'
;z¢306 08/22/88
549.99
METRO MECH CONTRACT
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
e6- 4e48- 68e -68
13725
27
2
22
549.99
•
23
24
256707
OB /ee /88
416.73
A PLUS PRESORT
POSTAGE
10-4290- 510 -51
7899
3t
'5
416.73
*
33
26,
!�_e56TOB
08 /eeiee
189.00
HERMAN SALES 6 SERV
SERVICE CONTRACTS
10 -4288- 510 -51
1683
3'
36
V0
29
189.00
•
3
38
30
256709
08 /2e /88
14.00
BETTY FRIEDRICHS
DUE FROM HRA
10- 1145- 000 -00
40
31
14.00
*
4,
32
42
33
256710
OB /2e /88
79e.80
PARAMOUNT CERAMIC
COST OF COMMODITIES
e3 -4624- 613 -61
69050 606E
47
44
34
35
79e.80
•
43
46
36
256711
08/22/88
48.00
LIZ GEREBI
SWIM PROGRAM
30-3511- 000 -00
-
46
37
38
39
48.00
*
49
Sp'
51
52
40
41
e56712
08 /ee /S8
376.30
SHADYWOOD TREE E %P
TREE ASSMT
60- 1300 - 088 —ee
33
84
e2
376.30
•
ss
66
43
44
45
*0000*
* ** —CKS
s7
30
e9�
ea
el
46
256714 08/22/88 80.55 HENN CTY DEPT OF POSTAGE 10-4290-140-14
47
80.55
*
e2
48
63
ee
49
256715
08/22/88
60.00
SUBURBAN PARATRANSIT
ACCTS RE
0 -t 3 -00 -
65
30
51
--
60.00
*
66
67
68
52
e56716
08 /e2 /88
e50.00
YOUR SPECIAL EVENT
ADVERTISING
30 -4214- 781 -78
69
53
54
250.00
•
70
71
2
"
256717
08/22/88
150.00
SCOTT DAVIES
PROF BERV OTHER
30-4224 - 781 -78
73
76
57
150.00
*
70
77
7
j 1988•CI' EDINA CHECK RE cR 09 -12 -88 - 27
CHECK NO_ DATE _- — AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. R P.O. M MESSAGE
�I31 1,049.00
•
I'
3
I4
�• » » » »» » »s -CKS 3
i e
`I.256N50 08/26/88 320.16__ NO STAR WATERWORKS REPAIR PARTS 40 -4540- 803 -80 28030 6481 ;s,
320.16 s-------- - - - - -_ ..- - - - - -- - B
is
— -- -- ---- - - - - -- - - - -- — rrr—CKS .,z
♦� ie56N68 09/06/86 617.55 NORTHSTAR ICE INVENTORY 50- 4632 - 842 -84 1:3
- - - - - - - - -- - - -- -- 617_._55 • e
sss -CKS e
ID ,
256N72 08/22/88 1 225.08 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES 6 TUBES 10 -4616- 560 -56 - - -z1
1,225.08 »
e56N76 -_ 08/22/98 -- — 250.07 NTCC INC. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 646 -64 M12201
ss» =CKS z3
2e
iz7\
30
3',
3
3J
13
133 ,
37
3
70
—. 40
41
42
43
44
43
Ion
—rVQ I47141
�.1 ;256017
L56017_______-
"IZ5001T
�f'i256017
09/06/88
08/22/88 _ _ -
oe/EE /aa
Oa /22/86
250.07 *
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
PRODUCTS
PRODUCTS
PRODUCTS
PRODUCTS
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
OFFICE EOUIPMENT
SERVICE CONTRACTS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
e5- 4906 - 510 -51
_e5_ -_ 4906 - 510 -5_1
30-4Eaa— Tal -7a
30-4516 - 761 -76
- - --
,4P
4B
72
33
134
33
-i
��. 256N8e
08/22/88
48.90
NW
GRAPHIC
SUPPLY
CRAFT SUPPLIES
23 -4588- 611 -61 151335
PRINTING
- - --
- - - -- - -
- -- - 48- _90_*
Ar
312.00 s
e,
_I
I'' 256N94
09/06/88
18.33
MN.
AMVETS
NEWS
ADVERTISING
50 -4211- 822 -82
�' 256N94
09/06/88
18.33
MN.
AMVETS
NEWS
ADVERTISING
50- 4214- 84e -84
258N94- ___
09/08/88
— 18.34 — _
- - -MN.
- ----
AMVETS
-----
NEWS - - -
- - - ---
-- ADVERTISING
50- 4214- 86e -86
jl
CONCESSIONS
55.00 »
3T50
e6
f, 7,
- -- —
-- -- —
�r,
-
-- - - -- —
— - --
- -- - - - -
--
vks !! »!r!
f9
7o
I =,i - --
ss» =CKS z3
2e
iz7\
30
3',
3
3J
13
133 ,
37
3
70
—. 40
41
42
43
44
43
Ion
—rVQ I47141
�.1 ;256017
L56017_______-
"IZ5001T
�f'i256017
09/06/88
08/22/88 _ _ -
oe/EE /aa
Oa /22/86
966.00
1_
-_ ,4.87:00
E6.08
66.00
2,547.88 !
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
PRODUCTS
PRODUCTS
PRODUCTS
PRODUCTS
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
OFFICE EOUIPMENT
SERVICE CONTRACTS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
e5- 4906 - 510 -51
_e5_ -_ 4906 - 510 -5_1
30-4Eaa— Tal -7a
30-4516 - 761 -76
058139 6400 — - --
05TE96
05641C
056800
,4P
4B
72
33
134
33
»!r —CKS
30
256024
09/06/86
312.00
OFF8ET
PRINTING
PRINTING
10- 4606 - 510 =31
e9e64
eJ
Ar
312.00 s
e,
_I
101
:�
le,
... -ctce
03
I_..e56030
06 /aa - - - -- -- -- - --
- -- - 182.50
OLD DUTCH FOODS
CONCESSIONS
LT -46E4- 663 -66
3T50
e6
f, 7,
182.50 •
-
-- - - -- —
— - --
- -- - - - -
--
vks !! »!r!
f9
7o
I =,i - --
c •rr -Ks
J
- j ��_ =I E56P11 00 /30 /aa 61x.00 PARK NIC MED CTR PHY EXAM 10 -4e46- 510 -51 I.
-- — -- 7
V
J
tow
1988 CITY
OF EDINA
PETTY
CHECK REGISTER 09 -12 -88
PAGE e6
CHECK NO.
DATE - _
- AMOUNT _
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P.O. A
MESSAGE
MEETING EXPENSE
10-4e01- S09 -50
618.00 •
e.80
PETTY
�•«�..+
wl
PARKING
10- 4204- te0 -12
08/23/88
- . +• -CKS -
17 e56Pe5
09/06/88
495.00
PEAK CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTED REPAI119 10- 4 @18 -6 646 -64 b717
08/23/88
- ;e56Pe5
es6pas
09/06/88
106
490.00
PEAK CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10- 4e48- 646 -64 659e
10- 4206 - 200 -e0
�'
09 so
490 . 00
985.00 •
GONSTRUOTION --eGNTRAeT-EI3-.REFAI-RO---71-0-4e4e 64664 - - - - - --
- - - -- --- --
i
« «.. «s - -
- - -- - -- - - -
- -- -- - - - - -- -
- - -- - - -- - - - - - -- - -
«s »-CKS
E56P36
E56P36
E56P36
E56P36
' 256P36
ZSGP36
E56P36
�= e56P36
e56P36
e56P36
2S6P36
2S6P36
E56P36
e56P36
j e56P36
E56P36
e56P36
i ESSP36
E56P36
"
E56P36
e56P36
E56P36
E56P36
E56P36
e56P36
II « « « « ««
" e5GP38
e56P38
e56P38
` °� sssss0
256P40
IE56P40
" e56P40
x «000.0
,51
256P4e
08/e3/88
33.14
PETTY
CASH
MEETING EXPENSE
10-2148- 000 -00
08/e3/88
16.14
PETTY
CASH
MEETING EXPENSE
10-4e01- S09 -50
08/23/88
e.80
PETTY
CASH
PARKING
10- 4204- te0 -12
08/23/88
9.8e
PETTY
CASH
MEETING EXPENSE
10-4206 - 140 -14
08/23/88
15.50
CASH
MEETING EXPENSE
10- 4206 - 200 -e0
_
08/23/88
_
10.00
___PETTY
PETTY
CASH
MEETING
10 -4206- 490 -49
08/23/88
5.40
PETTY
CASH
MILEAGE
10 -4208- 140 -14
08/23/88
6.17
PETTY
CASH
MILEAGE
10 -4208- 160 -16
08/23/88
2.99
PETTY
CASH
MILEAGE
10- 4208 - 510 -51
08/23/88
2.90
PETTY
CASH
MILEAGE
10- 4208 - 510 -51
08/23/88
10.00
CASH
MEETING
10 -4280- 504 -50
_
08/23/88
_
2.50
_PETTY
PETTY
CASH
POSTAGE
10 -4290- 510 -51
08/23/88
5.99
PETTY
CASH
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 100 -10
08/e3/88
30.00
PETTY
CASH
SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 5e0 -52
08/23/88
31.65
PETTY
CASH
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 623 -6e
08/23/88
16.57
PETTY
CASH
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 623 -6e
08/23/88
12.04
PETTY
CASH
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 624 -40
08%23/88
12.04=
PETTY
CASH ---SUPPLIES--
10= 4504 = 624 =40
08/23/88
8.96
PETTY
CASH
SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 6e4 -6e
08/23/88
12.04
PETTY
CASH
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 624 -6e
08/23/88
26.45
PETTY
CASH
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
10=4516 = 600 =60
08/23/88
8.37
PETTY
CASH
SUPPLIES
e6 -4504- 682 -68
08/23/88
8.36
PETTY
CASH
SUPPLIES
e6 -4504- 683 -68
08%23/88
15.00 ------PETTY-CASH
--DUES-
29 AE04=721ZE
08/e3/88
10.46
PETTY
CASH
COST OF GOODS SOLD
29- 4624- 72e -72
291.21 •
OS /23 /BS 466.90 PP -CE QUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540- 605 -60 T75T2Lv- -64@1
08/23/88 465.90 PFC EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 40-4540 - 805 -80 7757E3 6422
08/23/88 465.90 PFC EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 805 -80 7T57e1 6420
- - - -
1,397.70
- - - -- - - - - -- -
08/26/88 25.31 PHOTO FAST ADVERTISING OTHER 23-4214 - 611 -61 26686
08 /ee /88 7.64 PHOTO FAST ADVERTISING 23-4214- 611 -61 18276
- 08/22/88 - 6.14 - - -PHOTO FAST -- - - -- ADVERTI9ING- - 83= 4214- bY1 =b1 -18877
39.09 +
08/30/88 235.00 PHYSICIANS HEALTH AMBULANCE
10- 3180 - 000 -00
5
e
e
v
to
h,
.x
(1]
,a
i, e
.41
42
a]
a4
46
47
46
49
5o
1],
52
•••-CKS 174
55
56
I57
56
,5v
ec
02
*ss -CKS 1s4
GS
He
'c7
- C9
'o
71
72
71
74
7]
J
1988' CI EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE AOUNT
-- -- -- — -- - -M- _- 235.00 •
rtrirr
y1.1
CHECK RE, ER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
I 1 ________S0.00 CONTROL
50.00 #
/
09 -tE -88 _ E9
ACCOUNT N0. INV. • P.O. N MESSAGE
—
.4
I'
- -- - - - - - -- -- -- - - - s s -CKS -- - 3
FIRST AID SUPPLY 10- 4510 - 440 -44 EE1252 6385 le
� � I
�al iiitrt
y 256P48 08/22/88 36.70 PIP PRINTING PRINTING
256P48 - __.08/26/88 - 41_._90- P_IP PRINTING _ _ - PRINTING
78.60 r
E56P64 08/22/88 60.00 POMMER MFG CO
E56P64 08/22/88 _ - _ 192.00_ POMMER MFG CO
- 252.00 r - --
'IE56P94 09/06/88 45.00
— - -- - - -- - -
45.00 r
,
PUBLICITY CENTRAL
E56009 08/30/88 145.00 QUALITY REFRIG
vl`9i 145.00
I' ' rtrtir
v '
GENERAL SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLY
ADVERTISING 30 -4E14- 781 -78 E17E
CONTRACT SERV
2T -4E00- 663 -66 10277
256G20 _
ho
- -87.72 _ _
- - - - - - -- - - - * � -t -CKS
_ . z
- - -- -- - - - - --
30 -4600- 781 -78
3246
I14
25769
:: -
30- 4600 - 781 -78
3275
I,e
SERV
BATTERY
_ _
REPAIR
# #s -CKS
10 -4540- 560 -56
,e
v 256020
09/02/88
21
10-4504- 623 -6E
015E63 6524
'22
10- 4504 - 623 -6E
015186
23 ,-
ADVERTISING 30 -4E14- 781 -78 E17E
CONTRACT SERV
2T -4E00- 663 -66 10277
47
11"1256R09 _08/30/88 36.66 R.L. POLK 6 CO. ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 822 -82
256R09 08/30/86 36.67 R.l_bCi DVERT -I -SIN - = 84 -E= -8-4
�.
: 256R09 08/30/88 36.67 R.L. POLK 6 CO. ADVERTISING 50 -4214- 862 -86
g,
- - - - -- - - -- - -- - -- - - - - -1 10....0 0 • --
4 —
z
rtr -CKS x
.x
13
I3
rtr-CKS 3
3
_ _3
3
3
rt• -CK9 i4
Leo
�z
*Mr- CKS - - -;ea
e4
cos �
�a
7D
eo
+* =CKS-- ai
rr• -CKS
t56R21 OB /2! /88 87.50 RED WING SHOES LAUNDRY 10-4282- 301 -30 134802 SOE7 >i
87.50 # �4
t�. ]5 0
-- — 7
256G20 _
_ 06/2E/68 _ _ _-
- -87.72 _ _
- GUICK
_SERV
BATTERY_
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 -_ 560 -S6
25769
2560E0
I.
09 /OE /88
47.28
QUICK
SERV
BATTERY
_ _
REPAIR
PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
E6314 6364
v 256020
09/02/88
89.16
GUICK
SERV
BATTERY
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
E6330 6546
256Q20_ --
08/E2/B8
46.32
QUICK
SERV
BATTERY
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
25774
256020
08 /EE /88
9.64
QUICK
SERV
BATTERY
_
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540- 560 -56
E6039
�I I
280.12 #
I` i rrrrrr
- —
1421e560E2
_ 09/06/88 --
80.50
QUIK PRINT
PRINTING
27- 4600- 661 -66
013937 6575
256Q22
08/30/88
134.0E
OUIK PRINT
PRINTING
8 4T66--m- 6- 02988f da36-
v.
214.5E r
47
11"1256R09 _08/30/88 36.66 R.L. POLK 6 CO. ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 822 -82
256R09 08/30/86 36.67 R.l_bCi DVERT -I -SIN - = 84 -E= -8-4
�.
: 256R09 08/30/88 36.67 R.L. POLK 6 CO. ADVERTISING 50 -4214- 862 -86
g,
- - - - -- - - -- - -- - -- - - - - -1 10....0 0 • --
4 —
z
rtr -CKS x
.x
13
I3
rtr-CKS 3
3
_ _3
3
3
rt• -CK9 i4
Leo
�z
*Mr- CKS - - -;ea
e4
cos �
�a
7D
eo
+* =CKS-- ai
rr• -CKS
t56R21 OB /2! /88 87.50 RED WING SHOES LAUNDRY 10-4282- 301 -30 134802 SOE7 >i
87.50 # �4
t�. ]5 0
-- — 7
I1988 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO_ DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
CHECK REGISTER
'. 256REE 08/28/88 --- 117.00 _ REM SUPPLIES. _
256R22 08/22/88 45.64 REM SUPPLIES
t_
162.64 +
ITEM DESCRIPTION
09 -12 -88 PAGE 30
ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. N MESSAGE —
_ GENERAL SUPPLY 30- 4504- 782 -76 376366
GENERAL SUPPLY 30- 4504 - 782 -78 376367 a
a
_ e
t *r-C1(S to
is m
256R24 08/22/88 _ 586.50 RELIABLE - OFFICE
586.50 • 3
d
1a
25GR25. __09/02/88 247.60 RENTAL EQUIP_6_SALES— EQUIP REPLACE 10-4901- 650 -64 94TT 6568 15
- -
247.60 * - -- -- 17
I'
—
i
eS6R33
08 /ee /88
5,e64.7S
256R33 _
_ 08/22/88 _ _
3,769.95
e56R33
08 /e2 /88
_
3,199.20
57
1'.
### -CKS do
13
12,233.90 r
'. rrrrrr
6 CO
-----------------
e56R35
09 /Oe /8B
ee0.00
j' 256R35
08 /30/88
89.10
256R35
08/22/88
446.50
256R3S
08/22/88
_169.90
,256R35
08/22/88
35.80
256R35
08 /ee /B8
12.90
MSGR33
- --
08/22/88
e4.00
-
LI„
-- -- ---- - -
- - -- 998.20 s
rrrr *•
6 CO
GENERAL SUPPLY
',256R37
08 /ee /88
Se3.00
i-'2S6R37
09/02/88
423.00
GENERAL SUPPLY
_
I,e46 -00 r
5976
RICHFIELD
PLUMB
6 CO
vj=
-' 256R49
08/30/88
138.95
.256R49
08/30/88
359.00
97-45
I,- 00«00#
z
I'"I 256R51
09/06/88
168.94
^'I___
l
168.94 #
-I 0000##
z e56R53 -- -
09/02/88 -- --
78.5e
-
78.52 •
:::,,R:: _08/E6/88 _ -- 3,590.00
Ila
rrr -CKS 110
2;
REX DISTR. INVENTORY 50- 4630- 84e -84 2
REX_ DISTR. _ INVENTORY 50- 4630- 862 -86 Iz
REX DiBTR INVENTORY 50-4632= 8 @E -82 25
RIDDLE CONTROL PROD. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 330 -30 8807e3 6eG0
RIDDLE CONTROL PROD. REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 330 -30 880237 4168
ROAD RESCUE FIRST AID SUPPLY 10-4510- 440 -44 080152
ROAD RESCUE EQUIP REPLACEMENT 10- 4901- 440 -44 080152
ROBBINSDALE FARM GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 470 -47
ROBERT B. HILL GENERAL SUPPLY 10 =504 - X40 -44
_
ROGER8 PAINTING CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10 -4248- 646 -64
141
142
•�• —CK8 Idd
— _.— .— _-- - - -�43
de
41
da
4D
10
rrr -CKS is1
000-CKS 11
's3
'ad
sa
57
1'.
### -CKS do
13
RICHFIELD
PLUMB
6 CO
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
10- 4248- S20 -Se
6eS4
6030 3
RICHFIELD
PLUMB
6 CO
TO -e—
44E2
3
RICHFIELD
PLUMB
& CO
SERVICES
30 -4201- 782 -78
6328
13
RICHFIELD
PLUMB
E CO
GENERAL SUPPLY
30- 4504 - 782 -T8
4413
6207
RICHFIELD
PLUMB
6 CO
GENERAL SUPPLY
-4504- 8-78
30 72
4364
_- -_— —_ -3
6117 i3
RICHFIELD
PLUMB
6 CO
GENERAL SUPPLY
30- 4504 - 782 -78
4199
5976
RICHFIELD
PLUMB
6 CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504- 78e -78
4467
6259
RIDDLE CONTROL PROD. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 330 -30 8807e3 6eG0
RIDDLE CONTROL PROD. REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 330 -30 880237 4168
ROAD RESCUE FIRST AID SUPPLY 10-4510- 440 -44 080152
ROAD RESCUE EQUIP REPLACEMENT 10- 4901- 440 -44 080152
ROBBINSDALE FARM GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 470 -47
ROBERT B. HILL GENERAL SUPPLY 10 =504 - X40 -44
_
ROGER8 PAINTING CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10 -4248- 646 -64
141
142
•�• —CK8 Idd
— _.— .— _-- - - -�43
de
41
da
4D
10
rrr -CKS is1
's3
'ad
sa
57
1'.
### -CKS do
laz
1153
164
# ## —CKS
a2
all
]0
71
]2
�d
is
' -------'—
1988
CHECK NO
�-)
|' ~~
/
i� es
|'
' **
.�
"
--
|
. ~*
~1�
|�
p� es
— *p
as
[
as
as
as
as
as
as
as
as
!zi as
as
as
�=
. �
D ATE --AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. * P.O. 0 MESSAGE
EDINA CHECK RE, ZR 09-le-Se
"
6R77
06/22/88
loe.95
ROYAL CROWN BEV.
INVENTORY
50-4632-82e-62
17
6RSI
09/0e/Se
S9.81
RUBENSTEIN ZIFF
COST OF COMMODITIES
e3-46e4-613-61
114575
�14
S9.81
is
6R83
08/ee/Se
81.18
RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON
GENERAL SUPPLY
10-4504-301-30
54236
6SSI
21
4.09
to
63e7
08/ee/se
43.3e
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
GENERAL SUPPLY
10-4504-3e5-30
95877
4.
141
6Se7
08/ee/Se
53.00
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
GENERAL SUPPLY
10-4504-646-64
94870
6303
42
6S30
09/06/88
E38.e4
SIGN CENTRAL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30-4504-78e-78
633S3
:50
SS32
08/es/Se
as-6-.00
SOFTWARE FIRST
CONTRACTUAL SERV CE
0- 62--T"s
6S34
08/23/88
30.96
SOUTHDALE FORD
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540-560-56
183978
64
6S34
08/23/88
77.SS
SOUTHDALE FORD
REPAIR PARTS
10-4S40-560-S6
184321
fiS34
08/23/88
13. 1
TH DALE FORD
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540-560-56
184248
6834
08/23/88
55.82
SOUTHDALE FORD
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540-560-56
18443i
19
6S34
08/23/88
102.79
SOUTHDALE FORD
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540-560-S6
184451
70
6S34
08/23/88
43.96
SOUTHDAL' FORD
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540-560-56
183812
7
340.43
7
000-CKS
70,
"
�***�"� -f - --'--'--------------'
'^les000s worcc/mw e2 ow
| �
/^� 22.00 *
V-
09/06/e§---------11.7§1.87--
11^7e1.87 *
125GS95 08/30/8
------'---------
nupsnxnn pLAo`xme
SW SUBURBAN CABLE
GENERAL SUPPLY
CABLE T
e6-*so4-682-68 18603 usro
144.67 SERVICE SALES CORP OFFICE SUPPLIES 50-4516-822-82
-
***- CuS
iri
w
*~~ C^o 811 ^
op op 0 —CRT 73
`
[5`
75
`
1988 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
09-12-88
PAGE 3-2-
CHECK-NO-.--DATE---------A"UNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. 0 MESSAGE
1 256S45
09/02/88
34.37
ST. PAUL BOOK
CRAFT SUPPLY
23-452
256S45
06/26/88
20.85
ST. PAUL BOOK
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10-458�Wi�LSI
847737
-,E566,45
01.00e.108
19.1a
BY. PAUL BOOK
OFFICE SUPPLIED
19-4516-449-44
647667
09/0E/118
17.08
ST. PAUL BOOK
OFFICE SUPPLIES
e7-4516-661-66
e47660
�13
14,
)11,256,445
i!56845_
08/ee/88____
7. 14
ST. PAUL BOOK
OFFICE SUPPLIES
30-4516-7el-78
647623
401—
135.84
'17
PS6867
09/02/88
3,041.67
STORE FRONT
SERVICES
10-4eOl-SO4-SO
11e3
z54
3,041.67
27
*00-CKS
304
3 .50
REICHERS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
133
-_'-
09/06/8
S7.00
STREICHERS
AMMUNITION
10-4S72-420-42
528
�
^
_-_-�-^"--
!
eS6377
08/e3/88
S7.60
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
10-4e4S-S6Q-S6
6S!g-f6
-
S7.60
42
256878
08/22/69
36.72
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
GENERAL SUPPLY
26-4504-662-68
338411 6365
45
B56878
09/06/88
163.S9
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
28-4E48-70E-70
343117 65Z3
256378_____0S/E3/88_____
130.49._
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
REPAIR PARTS
40-4540-803-80
339676
wow-CKS
53
ar.6869
08.982099
87 0
56
�***�"� -f - --'--'--------------'
'^les000s worcc/mw e2 ow
| �
/^� 22.00 *
V-
09/06/e§---------11.7§1.87--
11^7e1.87 *
125GS95 08/30/8
------'---------
nupsnxnn pLAo`xme
SW SUBURBAN CABLE
GENERAL SUPPLY
CABLE T
e6-*so4-682-68 18603 usro
144.67 SERVICE SALES CORP OFFICE SUPPLIES 50-4516-822-82
-
***- CuS
iri
w
*~~ C^o 811 ^
op op 0 —CRT 73
`
[5`
75
`
1988 CI
= EDINA
`:�.I FFFFFF
CHECK RE
ER
-- - - - -- 69. 9 99 9 - - '' .- - - - --TARGET - -- -- -- ------ - - - - -.
SUPPLY
69.99 +
0
112330
67 1
6714
-CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DEBCRIPTION
`.I'i256895
08/30/88
144.67
SERVICE SALES CORP
OFFICE SUPPLIES
3,256895
08/30/88. -
.144.68 _
SERVICE, CORP
OFFICE SUPPLIES
gi
__
434.02 s
-_— -SALES -
- - - - --
n 256896
OA /30/88-
_ 50.00 _
SCHENEMAN -AMY
-- U- -- -
SERVICES
O
" P56T11
80.00 s
--
-
CHEM.
GENERAL
SUPPLY
10- 4504- 3022 -30
146167
256701
09/02/86
7.54
TANDY CONSUMER SERV.
REPAIR PARTS
j� FFFFFF
OFFICE SUPPLIES
09 -12 -88 33
ACCOUNT NO. INV, - k P.O. N MESSAGE
50 -4516- 842 -84 ;3
50- 4516 - 862 -86 i4
27- 4201- 662 -16 0812 5754
10- 4540- 646 -64 35633
23- 4516 - 611 -61
CONCE_S_SION_S_ 126- 4624_- 683 -68
CONCESSION — 26- 4624 - 683 -68
°
]
D
10
1
**P-CKS 112
17
to
�le
_ 4e
'n
FFF -CKS Ile
FFF-
FFF-
,D
'z0
21
1
X31
3
25671 0
09/012/88
- - - - -
`:�.I FFFFFF
TERRY ANN SALES
- -- -
... - -
12 56703 - - - -- - -- - - - - - -- --
' OB /PP /88
-- - - - -- 69. 9 99 9 - - '' .- - - - --TARGET - -- -- -- ------ - - - - -.
SUPPLY
69.99 +
0
112330
67 1
6714
35
P56T10
z, P56T05 09/02/88
11 .50 _TAYSTEE_ BAKING- CO.
TERRY ANN SALES
256705 08/22/88
34.50 TAYSTEE BAKING CO.
- --
SUPPLY
46.00 +
j� FFFFFF
OFFICE SUPPLIES
09 -12 -88 33
ACCOUNT NO. INV, - k P.O. N MESSAGE
50 -4516- 842 -84 ;3
50- 4516 - 862 -86 i4
27- 4201- 662 -16 0812 5754
10- 4540- 646 -64 35633
23- 4516 - 611 -61
CONCE_S_SION_S_ 126- 4624_- 683 -68
CONCESSION — 26- 4624 - 683 -68
°
]
D
10
1
**P-CKS 112
17
to
�le
_ 4e
'n
FFF -CKS Ile
FFF-
FFF-
,D
'z0
21
1
X31
3
25671 0
09/012/88
- - - - -
_ 588.30
-- -- - - --
TERRY ANN SALES
- -- -
CO.
GENERAL
SUPPLY
127 -4504- 664 -66
0
112330
67 1
6714
35
P56T10
09/02/86
140.30
TERRY ANN SALES
--
CO.
-- --- - ----
GENERAL
- --
SUPPLY
- -- -- -- - -- - -
27- 4504 - 664 -66
--
123128
664E
�p
37
726.60 +
35
39
]_
" P56T11
08/30/88
TESSMAN SEED 6
CHEM.
GENERAL
SUPPLY
10- 4504- 3022 -30
146167
a0
354.00
6532
41
256T11
08/26/88
85.00
TESSMAN SEED 6
CHEM.
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
40- 4504 - 802 -80
149631
6486
ax
X43
I • 1
00
--
--
— --
- - --
.
L.Y•i ++ + + ++
145
+ ++ -CKS
I4] 46
1256TP0
08/1212/88
505.00
THE PRINT SHOP
GENERAL
SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 510 -51
7661
6641
-42
°�P56TP0
08/23/88
P96.P0
THE PRINT SHOP
PRINTING
10- 4600- 628 -612
T443
'50
' P56T120__-----
_- 09/012/891292.80
THE PRINT SHOP
--
10- 4600 - 6128 -62
7730
51
P56T20
09/012/88
36.125
THE PRINT SHOP
_PRINTING
PRINTING
10- 4600 -6128- 627686
6580
;53
1.130.PS F
154
X57
:4
95
l•s 256T26
'�- - -
08/30/88
- -- - - - -- -
50.75
-- -+
THERMAL CO.
- - ---
GENERAL
SUPPLY
28- 4504- 702 -70
M60159
6442
50-
eo
50.75
--
el
V
17
iez
4 111111
FFF —GKS IRa
- 165
30I256T36 08/23/88 15.50 TISDEL STANDARD REPAIR PARTS 10-4540- 560 -56 4057 In6
°]
fp
54 •FSFFF FFF-CKS ]I
n .
72
11256T40 08/23/88 100.91 TOLL COMPANY WELDING SUPPLY 10-4610 - 560 -56 431798 73
5� 1 00.91 + 74
1] 75
! JI 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 09 -12 -88 PAGE 34
jl CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. R P.O. N MESSAGE
Ie56T53 08/30/88 7,e80.ee TRACY OIL GASOLINE 10 -461e- 560 -56 Te699 6497
I -'
09/02/88
183.70
T, eeo_ee
•
PARTS
10- 4540- 390 -30
789924 6534
G- -id1IE56U14
08/23/88
26.90
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540- 5E0 -SE
784763
z,256U14
09/02/88
e03.37
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
I''
I°
e56T7e
oe /ee /88
46.60
TROPICAL 8N0 OF MN
CONCESSIONS
e6 -46e4- 683 -68
`
e56T72
oe /ee /ee
966.00
TROPICAL 8NO OF MN
CONCESSIONS
e6- 46e4 - 683 -68 8578
- - -
— - -
1 012.60.-*
--
-- - -,
-- - - - --
- —
�-I''�
e56T88
08/30/68
13e.70
TWIN CITY HOME JUICE
INVENTORY
50- 463e- 84e -84
, '-
E56T88
081E2 /88
30.12
TWIN CITY HOME JUICE
INVENTORY
50 -4632- 862 -86
-
162. 82
•
z:
-
1111!1
- - - --
-
e58T91
08 /E2 /88
1,354.24
TWIN CITY TESTING
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
40 -4248- 801 -80 8850e1
t-
I -.
-- UNIVERSITY OF MN --
- C 0 N F d
1 , 354.24
t
- -- ` - -'
IJ
�.. 256UeO
-L'Sacrea
09/02/88
09v'0ey'e8
5,000.00
5,e00.00
UNIVERSITY OF MN
UNIVERSITY Or- MN
CONF 8
GANF
SCHOOLS
27-4202- 661 -66
8
80110068
a? 4802 664 =04-
e56U05
09/06/88
- - -- -
se. 06_
- - --
U8 WEST CELLULAR
- -- - — - -- -
EQUIP RENTAL
10-4ee6- 4e0 -4e
52. 0 6
- -- -
!
-- -- -- -
- - --
e56U08
09 /06 /se
4,436.86
UNIFORM UNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
10- 4866- 4e0 -4e
1'1
e56U08
09/06/86
- 35.50
_• UNIFORM UNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
10- 4266- 430 -42
08/30/88
283.35
_ __
UNIFORM UNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
10- 4266 - 440 -44 12037
"/256U08
256U08
09/06/88
244.00
UNIFORM UNLIMITED
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42
I�,'-
- --
-- -
4,999.71
5483
I4�IE56U14
09/02/88
183.70
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540- 390 -30
789924 6534
G- -id1IE56U14
08/23/88
26.90
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540- 5E0 -SE
784763
z,256U14
09/02/88
e03.37
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
GENERAL
SUPPLY
eT -4504- 664 -86
777456 6261
413.97 •
I
17 256U17
08/30/88
47.90
UNITOG RENTAL SERV.
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 482 -48
333858
" --
47.90 #
I
^1256U20
09/06/88
- 145.60
-- UNIVERSITY OF MN --
- C 0 N F d
SCHOOL
T0=4202- 420 =42
- -- ` - -'
IJ
�.. 256UeO
-L'Sacrea
09/02/88
09v'0ey'e8
5,000.00
5,e00.00
UNIVERSITY OF MN
UNIVERSITY Or- MN
CONF 8
GANF
SCHOOLS
27-4202- 661 -66
8
80110068
a? 4802 664 =04-
13 is
_,_�.+ *-CKS- -- ---- I•
- ItIs
e 4
e
0
i14 qk
'3
jle
004
ID
^°
*** -CKS 12
IZ
i3
13
13
** *-CKS 3
�3
3
3
** *-CKS 3
a
4
40
* ** -CKS 'Ot
I"
sz
:31,4
* ** -CKS
ez �14
eJle4
s*s -CKS In1I4
4
198$ CI EDINA
`,,--CHECK NO. DATE
�2
rrrrrr _.
e56U30 09/06/88
I'I
"I' rrrrrr
CHECK RE ER 09 -12 -88 35
- AMOUNT - VENDOR -_ ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE
61.50 U8 WEST PAGING SERVICE CONTRACTS
— - - -6 -1 .5 0- - -'— — — -- -- - - - - - -- -
e56V1S 08/30/88 e77.e0 VAN PAPER CO. PAPER SUPPLIES
277.20 •
- - - rrr-CKS
30 -4988- 781 -78
rrr -CKS
10- 4514 - 590 -Se e190S1 6S87
12
13
,e
'e
le
O
II ,
2
'
--, 3
,:41
ne
lie
*rr -CKS „
X19
E56V30 -_._._ 09/02/88 __ ___ -. __..._ 128.56__. VANTAGE ELECTRIC - e7-4201- 662 -66 010339 6785 _ - -- 20
iE56V30 09/06/88 34e.e9 VANTAGE ELECTRIC SERVICES ET -4e01- 664 -66 010327 6834 21
_. "Ie56V30 08/26/88 e19.10 VANTAGE ELECTRIC PROF SERVICES 30- 4201- TSe -78 010334 j22
- - - -- - - -- — - -- - - -- 689_95 « - -- - _ ;2e
�23
rrrrrs
*44-CKS 27
v
'28
2 e56V35 09/06/88 9.50 VAUGHNS DUP CABLE TV 10 -e149- 000 -00 32ee7
9.50 • 30
131
i" srrrsr rrr-CKS 3,
x
e56V40 - -- -09/01 /88 -- - -- - - - -- -- -- - -- - -- -- -- - - - - -- - -- I36
27$ .60
e78.60 VELDE CONFERENCE 10 -4eoe- 480 -48
I.DI 39
• }rrr• - -- - -- ---- - - - - -- - -- -
000-CKS
l4i
Qi:� -.r 0 °°• ^^ 750 0 1F6fi13 •PEE VC -Hf9�E RENTAL E9^viPMENT a:p 4eefi 6e 00- 14? 4z
ddeea°° _ _750.00_ _ _VERBAT_ILE VEIIIeLE RENTAL = - EQUIPMENT eT 44Q_efi -6Go 66
`3'Ie56V43 06 /e3 /86 - 750.00 VERSATILE VEHICLE RENTAL EQUIPMENT e7 -4976- 665 -66 43
eS6V43 08/30/88 480.00 VERSATILE VEHICLE LEASE LINE e7 -4e76- 665 -66 46
e56V43 _ 08 /ee /88 1,T06_05 VERSATILE VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS e7-4540- 665 -66 Ion
' 2,936.05 *
13G 1 - -4fl
30
'D rrrrrr rrr -CKS I61
eS6V54 08/30/88 e91.06 VIKING FOREST PROD. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 643 -64 95914 ;54
- - -- -- - - - -- - ---- ` - -- -- - -- - PROB. - -- - _ 16
es6v e91 .06 VIKING FOREST PROD. PHOTO Supplies 7B
,7" !!!9ev!9q 0 S2!l 0 ;0 ^ 91 -ei2 VIKING FOREST PROD. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10859643 =64-- 944+4-
291.06 s 6,
e2
v `'r •r1 /rt
***-Cgs 164
P-56VTS 08/30/88 e1.00 VITO -LEANN CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10-4e4a- 440 -44 1183 °e
e56V75 09/0e/88 65_.00 _ VITO -LE ANN CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10-4e48- 440 -44 1184 e2
86.00 s e�
'c 20
v,
rrrrr•
000-CKS 72
J e56WOS oe/e3/ee 16.30 W.W. GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- seo -se 7e
s�
i
d..
WI 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER
09 -1E -88 PAGE 36
ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE
REPAIR PARTS
-__ REPAIR._PARTS_ __
REPAIR PARTS
TOOLS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
TOOLS
TOOLS
ESGW11 09 /02 /8S 574.17 W. GORDON SMITH GASOLINE
256"11 08/22/88 499.06 W. GORDON SMITH GASOLINE
f 1,073..23 *
117 *r * * **
Vi
10- 4540 - 520 -52
10-4540 - 540 -54
10- 4580 - 801 -80
E6- 4248- 70E -70 298975 -
40- 4580 - 601 -80
40- 4580 - 601 -80
ET -4616- 664 -66 1874 5636
27-4612- 664 -66 1849
I'
jIII1
a `
s
to i
1 �
113
4
* * * -CKa
"I4
* ** -CKS
I.
CHECK_NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
MCMT- 8AVAGE
RUBBISH REMOVAL
2561108
081'22/88
1,391.61
W.W.
GRAINGER
E56WE5
3' 256"08
08/22/88 ..
_ _._ .345.07.---
-- _W.W-GRAINGER___.
RUBBISH REMOVAL
f0 -4250- 440 -44
256"08
08/22/88
176.34
W.W.
GRAINGER
256WP5 _
E36W06
OS/E3/88
96.00
M.M.
GRAINGER
10- 4250 - 580 -52
256WOS
09/06/68 _ -_
-_ 470.36____W.W.
GRAINGER___
256"25
08/22/88
08/22/88
255.63
W.W.
6RAIN6ER
(2.256W08
:E56W08
08/23/88
57.21
W.W.
GRAINGER
256W25
08/22/88
52.82
WASTE
MCMT- SAVAGE
RUBBISH REMOVAL
I•
73
3O
fr�
=•G * *** **
I,7I
256 "25
09 -1E -88 PAGE 36
ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE
REPAIR PARTS
-__ REPAIR._PARTS_ __
REPAIR PARTS
TOOLS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
TOOLS
TOOLS
ESGW11 09 /02 /8S 574.17 W. GORDON SMITH GASOLINE
256"11 08/22/88 499.06 W. GORDON SMITH GASOLINE
f 1,073..23 *
117 *r * * **
Vi
10- 4540 - 520 -52
10-4540 - 540 -54
10- 4580 - 801 -80
E6- 4248- 70E -70 298975 -
40- 4580 - 601 -80
40- 4580 - 601 -80
ET -4616- 664 -66 1874 5636
27-4612- 664 -66 1849
I'
jIII1
a `
s
to i
1 �
113
4
* * * -CKa
"I4
* ** -CKS
I.
256W25
08/22/88
316.95
WASTE
MCMT- 8AVAGE
RUBBISH REMOVAL
10- 4280 - 301 -30
_
23I
t,
E56WE5
08/22/88
52.79
WASTE
MCMT- SAVAGE
RUBBISH REMOVAL
f0 -4250- 440 -44
G S
* ** -CKS P5t
c7
128.
256WP5 _
08/P2/68
_ _ _ 418.51
WASTE
MGMT- SAVAGE
RUBBISH REMOVAL
10- 4250 - 580 -52
WILLIAMS STEEL GENERAL SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 3011 -30 132587
_ - -- 'Sv
: 2
256"25
08/22/88
_
316.95
WASTE
MGMT- SAVAGE
RUBBISH REMOVAL
10 -4250- 540 54 - --
=
—
_I?'I
�`~- {I
Fv
3
256W25
08/22/88
52.82
WASTE
MCMT- SAVAGE
RUBBISH REMOVAL
10 -4250- 645 -64
73
3O
fr�
=•G * *** **
I,7I
256 "25
08/22/88
211.30
WASTE
MGMT- SAVAGE
RUBBISH REMOVAL
10 -4250- 645 -64
�',
E
256W25
256W25
08/22/88
08/22/88
31.28
109.24
WASTE
WASTE
MGM T - SAVAGE
MCMT - SAVAGE
NUBBISH- REMOVAC-------723--�4250
RUBBISH REMOVAL
=61 -2- 61
26- 4250- 682 -68
133
J4
'
256WP5
08/22/88
211.27
WASTE
MGMT -SAVAGE__________
RUBBISH_ REMOVAL
27- 4250- 662 -66
3a
E56WE3
08 /EE /8B
52.79
WASTE
MGMT - SAVAGE
RUBBISH REMOVAL
27 -4250- 664 -66
37I
c'•
E36WE3
08 /2P /8S
156.60
WASTE
MGMT - SAVAGE
RUBBISH REMOVAL
E8 -4250- 702 -70
30,
"
E56WE5 _
08/PE/88
158.60
WASTE
MCMT - SAVAGE
RUBBISH REMOVAL
30- 4250- 782 -78
��„
= ,E56WE5
E56WE5
08 /EE /88
08/P2/88
E80.60
E80.60
WASTE
WASTE
MGMT =SAVAGE
MGMT- SAVAGE
_
RUBBISH REMOVA��d=
RUBBISH REMOVAL
425�8A1 =84
50-4250- 861 -86
P40
i41
42
2,652.30
-._.
- - - --
-
'44
-fan%
�' --I
• ** ***
* **-CKS
X47
256WE9
09%2 %88
EATER-
PRifdDi`.
EPAZR -PART
- 0�- 03= 8Y- U735T3 -6789
4
2
57.56—
IA
37.50 s
50�
_
5z
54
55�
`,.256W41
09/06/88
156.90
WEST
PHOTO
PHOTO SUPPLIES
10 -4508- 420 -42 09515
175
_.
156.90 s
d7
nal
'i
15°
*** -CKS
'e0
(.rqe56W55
08/26/68
86.15
WHITE OAK GALLERY OFFICE SUPPLIES
30 -4S16- 781 -78
°2
_
86.15 *
°J
Gal
1✓
41
"' * * * * **
G S
* ** -CKS P5t
c7
so
52�256W66 08/22/88
65.74
WILLIAMS STEEL GENERAL SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 3011 -30 132587
_ - -- 'Sv
C,
3
je56W66 08/22/88
71.35
WILLIAMS STEEL GENERAL SUPPLY
10 -4504- 560 -56 133772
J0
f' --
137.09 s
711
72I
73
fr�
=•G * *** **
I,7I
** *-CKS
J4�
5
7
1986 Cl' EDINA
I
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT
ie
L'
I'
�1
a I`-
� C
I3-
1-3-
I'
CHECK RE :R
VFNAAR TTFN AFQCOTOTTAN
09 -12 -68 37
ArnnIINT NA TNV • 0 A Y NCQQACF
1
i
2 2
_08/22/88_ i
i3OS W
WM H ZIEGLER CO INC R
REPAIR PARTS 1
10- 4540 - 560 -56 19230 6552 3
2
4 4
4.05 r
5 e
e
° r
rryr *r r
rr• -CKS e
e
7 9
9
° E
E56W88 —
08/ @E/88 -
8.00 W
WOHLRABE -SUSAN M
MEETING EXPENSE 1
10 -4206- 140 -14
° _
— 0
-- 8
'2
10 1
rrrrr•
*00-CKS 1
13
13'256X05 0
08/26/88 7
72.60 X
XEROX CORP. P
PRINTING 1
10- 4600- 510 -51 1
17
14 7
_ —_ 2
72.60 • 1
1e
'6 r
rrrrrr 0
000—CKS 2
21
f0 2
256Z05 0
08/30/88 7
7_6.00 Z
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE G
GENERAL SUPPLIES 2
28- 4504 - 702 -70 478684 2
23
24
19;— T
T6.00 • 2
25
2' r
rst�r� _
_ r
rss-CKS 2
2e
22 4
413,408.81 ,
,
23 2
2,558.07 F
FUND 23 TOTAL A
ART CENTER
24 1
13,262.23 1
13,3e9.2-3 F
FUND BS T 6
6flrPlTrr''6 — r°-'UNB 3
31
V3� 3
3,988.15 F
FUND E6 TOTAL S
SWIMMING POOL FUND 3
3
26 E
E5,991.77 F
FUND 27 TOTAL G
GOLF COURSE FUND
27 2
2Q,851.0E F
FUND E8 TOTAL R
RECREATION CENTER FUND 3
3s
28 8
876.70 F
FUND 29 TOTAL G
GUN RANGE FUND 3
3