Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-09-12_COUNCIL PACKET* AGENDA JOINT EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY /COUNCIL MEETING EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 12, 1988 (Convene Joint HRA /Council Meeting) ROLLCALL I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JOINT HRA /COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH.? AND.HRA MINUTES OF AUGUST.1, 1988 II. PUBLIC HEARING - HEDBERG DEVELOPMENT A. Overall Development Plan Approval /Final Rezoning R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to MDD -6 Mixed Development District B. Final Plat Approval - South Edina Development Corporation First Addition C. Final Site Plan Approval - Phase I D. Approval of Amended Redevelopment Agreement III. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered -in its normal sequence on the agenda. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of August 15, 1988. III. PUBLIC HEARING AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits. of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Appeal from Board of Appeals Decision - Front Yard Setback.Variance - James and Linda M. Masica, 6817 Valley View Road B. Lot Division - Part of Lots 2 and 3, Cassin's Outlots - BTO Development - Corporation - Fairview Southdale Hospital Healthcare Services Corp. C. Preliminary Plat Approval - Berenberg First Addition - Part of Lot 1, Block 1, Hilldale. Generally located north of Interlachen Blvd and west of Oxford Avenue (Continue to 10/3/88 D. Set Hearing Date (9/19/88) 1. Preliminary Rezoning - PRD -4 Planned Residence District to PSR -4 Planned Senior Citizen District - RRI Services, Inc. and Preliminary Plat Approval of Elder Homestead - Generally located in the northwest' quadrant of the York Avenue /Parklawn intersection 2. Preliminary Rezoning - R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District - Peggy C. Erhardt Estate and Preliminary Plat Approval for Erhardt Addition - Generally located in the southeast quadrant of the Brookview Avenue/Valley View Road intersection 3. Preliminary Plat Approval - Edina Highlands 2nd Addition - Steven L.- Utne - 5257 Lochloy Drive - Lot 6, Block 1, Edina Highlands Agenda Edina City Council - September 12, 1988 Page Two IV. PUBLIC HEARING ON STREET VACATION. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to.pass. A. Vacation of Willson Drive - Plat of Edenmoor V. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS VI. AWARD OF BIDS * A. Used Hydraulic Articulated Motor Grader (Continued from 8/15/88) * B. One Ton Paver VII. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS * A. Temporary.On -Sale Liquor License - Edinamite (10/15/88) * B.. Election Judges for General Election * C. 1988 IAFF Contract Settlement Proposal * D. 1988 -89 Local 49 Contract Proposal E. Golf Dome Purchase VIII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS * A. Construction of Sidewalk - Residents between 60th and 62nd Streets - West side of Xerxes Avenue * B. Restoration of Storm Drainage System - Chateau Edina Association, 6415 York Avenue IX. RESOLUTIONS. Favorable rollcall vote by majority of quorum to pass. A. Construction of Utilities - HRA - Minnesota Drive from Edinborough Way to France Avenue B. Construction of Utilities - Mailbu Drive from Lincoln Drive to 700' easterly X . SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL XI. POST AGENDA AND'MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS XII. FINANCE * Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 9/12/99: General Fund $413,408.81, Art Center $2,558.07, Capital Fund $13,262.23, Swimming Pool Fund $3,988.15, Golf Course Fund $25,591.77, Recreation Center Fund $28,851.02, Gun Range Fund $876.70, Edinborough Park $11,118.92, Utility Fund $223,144.49, Liquor Dispensary Fund $28,786.19, Construction Fund $6,419.12, Total $758,005.47 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Thurs Sept 15 Budget Hearing 4:30 p.m. Manager's Conf.Rm Mon Sept 19 Regular Council Meeting. 7:00 p.m. Council Room Mon Oct 3 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Sat Oct 15 EDINAMITE 7:00 p.m. Edinborough Park Mon Oct 17 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room MINUTES EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AUGUST 1, 1988 Answering rollcall were'Commissioners Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner and Courtney. MINUTES of the HRA Meeting of July 11, 1988 were approved as submitted by motion of Commissioner Turner, seconded by Commissioner Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT OF HRA SECOND MORTGAGE ON EDINBOROUGH ELDERLY DEVELOPMENT APPROVED. Executive Director Hughes explained that at present the HRA has a second mortgage on Edina Park Plaza Elderly Housing Development that secures the repayment of the interest reduction advances that the HRA periodically provides to the development. The HRA is junior to a $14,628,000 mortgage held by First National Bank of Minneapolis on the building. The developer has secured an additional $42,800 in a line of credit from HUD and First National Bank to pay some unfinished construction costs on the property. The developer is requesting that.the HRA subordinate its mortgage to the additional $42,800 mortgage being placed on the property. Because the funds will be used to pay construction costs and will result in satisfaction of all mechanic liens against the Edina Park Plaza Elderly Development, Attorney Tom Erickson has recommended that the Subordination Agreement be given by the HRA, subject to obtaining a new opinion of counsel for the developer and agreement from the guarantors to the effect that the giving of this new Subordination Agreement by the HRA will not in any way affect the guaranty.. Following a brief discussion, Commissioner Richards moved adoption of the following resolution,.subject to obtaining said opinion of counsel and agreement from the guarantors: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, that it hereby approves the Subordination Agreement for the additional $42,800 mortgage being placed on the Edina Park Plaza property; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman and Secretary or Assistant Secretary of the HRA are directed to execute the Subordination Agreement. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Commissioner Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, motion of Commissioner Turner was seconded by Commissioner Richards for adjournment. Motion carried. Executive Director MINUTES OF THE JOINT MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY /CITY COUNCIL MARCH 7, 1988 A joint meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the City Council was convened to consider concurrently amendments to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, approval of the Tax Increment Financing Plan and Redevelopment Contract and Condemnation of DeCourcy Property. Action was taken by the HRA and the Council individually as required. Answering rollcall were Commissioners /Members Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner and Courtney. MIN= of the HRA Meeting of February 22, 1988 were approved as submitted by motion of Commissioner Turner, seconded by Commissioner Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. RESOLUTION ADOPTED APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN AND REDEVELOPMENT CONTRACT. Manager Rosland introduced Mr. Peter Jarvis of the development team to update the Commissioners on the Hedberg Project. Mr. Jarvis reported that he had first appeared before the HRA approximately six months ago and at that time went through the Master Plan. Three subsequent meetings have been held discussing this Plan with regard to the park and the 494 Corridor Study. Fundamental questions have been asked about the overall tax increment project. Mr. Jarvis presented the exhibits which highlighted the overall Master Plan with changes that have taken place since September -- specifically, 110 acres with high quality regional accessibility characteristics. What has been created is a mixed -use project with all but three acres in Edina. It has a north /south linear orientation, picking.up where the Yorktown trail system ends at the north, winding through the project and then cutting through to the west, tying directly into the turnaround that has been created on the west entry to Edinborough Park. Along France Avenue, where the noise level is the highest and where the traffic characteristics of the immediate site area are the greatest, a series of non - residential uses are arranged, starting with premier office buildings in the southwest corner and at the corner of 76th and France. Included in this area are a major retail center, health and recreation athletic club, a small office statement and a multi- screen movie theater. Across the lake, there is predominately housing all the way from north to south. A minimum of two or three types of housing is contemplated for-sale in the low scale, and there will also be high -rise rental housing. A hotel is planned for the Bloomington side. There will be a 26 -acre open space going through the development which will allow for jogging, walking, ice skating, cross - country skiing and snow - shoeing. This area would create the - buffer and also the linkage between the residential and non - residential. The major changes are in the park area -- specifically, the central park. Both a winter park and summer park site plan were shown. Criticism has been made regarding the park structure location with regard to parking. It was suggested that the park be re- oriented, bringing it to the west side, closer to France Avenue to give it a focal point entry off of France Avenue. Whatever the configuration, the retail uses are the most public part of the project, where people are free to come and go. Mr. Jarvis explained that the environmental putting golf course could be developed in central park, with central park being enlarged and the amphitheater expanded. There will be a major tot lot and wading beach H.R.A. Minutes March 7, 1988 Page 2 area separated from the lake in a convenient way for parents or seniors. Mr. Jarvis introduced Warren Beck, the developer of the retail portion of the Hedberg project as well as the owner /manager of the Galleria. Mr. Beck explained that the master plan is looking at the expansion of the Galleria and the issue of traffic linkage. It appears that the juxtaposition of that transit service is going to happen with a minimum of physical conflicts relative to the original design concept. The transit analysis is continuing at the present time, as are the draft EIS hearing period and public hearings. Mr. Beck commented on where the plans were a few months ago and how the retail and athletic facilities have evolved. Initially, a two -level enclosed mall with an athletic facility was proposed. The concept today is the single store, visibility and single store access, allowing the customers to drive to and park near the store itself. A 75,000 square foot softgoods store, Mainstreet, is a concept developed by the Federated Stores. Other stores fitting the category of those at Southdale are being considered. There are a number of larger store users that may not be 75,000 square feet in size but are more than 15,000 square feet in size that have been seeking the Southdale area locations for some time, and they are being approached. An .enclosed mall that does not have a high level of occupancy generates traffic and ends up being a real problem for everybody involved. The timing was fortunate _in the refiguring of the retail area in that it was the same time there was a push to bring a larger focus to the park. Mr. Jarvis said that final staging for Phase I becomes a window to France Avenue with a theater, office building with a medical office specialty, retail and health club. Estimates have been made which put an overall park budget together with a contingency in the 9.5 to 10.5 million range and Phase I in the 4.5 to 5.5 million dollar range, depending on final programs which are clearly not developed at this point. There will be a drainage retention area to accommodate the Southeast Edina Plan. Hennepin County is handling the final engineering design on the upgrade of France Avenue. Mr. Jarvis commented that the headquarters building and the little building housing the marina's uses have shifted to a slightly different focal point from winter to summer. The possible changing of the park to the east side came about because questions were raised about the fundamental structure of the park, both in terms of programmed activities and dimensional concerns, specifically whether the amphitheater was a good idea and as well the lack of proximity to parking in the previous orientation. Consultants and staff collectively have agreed to take a fresh look at the main features, especially the major tot lot, the environmental putting surface and the consolidation of games. A strong consensus emerged that there were a lot of good things that could be said about the strong visual relationship of the structure being directly back of France Avenue as well as proximity of public .parking below the structure. Commissioner Turner stated that the new configuration increases the accessibility to the park structure for the whole City rather than decreases it. This way the public has two access streets . instead of one with a larger parking area, and it is more visible to the surrounding area. She felt this is a much more accessible location for the whole City. Commissioner Turner questioned parking adequacy during retail hours, and Mr. Jarvis explained that the required parking of 500 to 1,000 spaces for retail and 500 to 1,000 for the recreation facility would be adequate 95% of the time. Parking should not be a concern 11 months out of the year. A major event in the amphitheater could generate 1,000 people. Mr. Jarvis reminded the Commissioners that this mixed -use development concept gives the project a sense of vitality and life, making it unique. He stated that one of the things he did not want to do was to screen the parking ramp from the park architecturally.. If the project goes as planned, it would be a H.R.A. Minutes March 7, 1988 Page 3 10 to 12 -year schedule until total completion. Bonds will be sold as necessary, some short term and some long term; the longest period for them would be 25 years from the date of the first receipt of tax increment. Executive Director Hughes commented that if it were not for tax increment financing, the costs would be amortized through special assessments against the property rather than the version of the real estate tax dollar in tax - -increment-financing., Director Hughes explained that if we.-did not collect the special assessments, it would be a general obligation to the City. He stated 'that the dedication at the time of development involves land rather than development. In order to develop the land once received, either the general City budget or the park dedication contribution by all the developers is needed. Director Hughes commented that the acquisition price is financed back through tax increments rather than the contribution. Commissioner Smith asked if the Hedberg project were to be sold piecemeal, what kind of ability would there be to negotiate and control the ultimate footprints. Director Hughes stated that we would have to rely on the normal zoning ordinance and that control would be lot by lot. Commissioner Turner remarked that she would like to commend the development team and the staff who have worked so hard on this project. She commented on the traffic, the issue of peak hour trips, the trip limit we imposed on Homart and whether we should apply our standards to this project. Having spent one and one -half years working on the 494 study, she believes development along this corridor has a major impact on our whole transportation system. Commissioner Richards commented that as enthused as he was about Edinborough, he is even more so for Hedberg. He would support the resolution approving the 1988 amendments to the Southeast Edina Plan, approv- ing the establishment of a tax increment financing plan, establishment of the district and authorization to execute and implement the redevelopment agree- ment with the understanding that what is in that redevelopment agreement,,are the contingencies of subsequent approval of a housing plan, subsequent ap- proval of the Council as to the EIS and the feasibility of the tax increment financing and the ability for the capture to serve as the proposed bonded indebtedness of $19.5 million.-- It is further understood that the indirect source permit will enable us to impose and make part of the body of that permit any TDM that the Council feels appropriate and to be consistent with our trip generation program in what we are trying to do to control traffic in that whole Southeast Edina area. Commissioner Kelly commented that she could not vote for this tax increment district at this time. She felt there were too many unknowns; the housing component is identified in the existing tax increment district, and the storm water problem is totally in need of cor- rection. She questioned the building of the whole park, maintenance and security, and indicated she had unknowns regarding the shortfall agreement. Commissioner Smith commented.that the shortfall agreement allows us to tax at the higher rate so we can cover the debt service that is tied to the $19 million. Commissioner Kelly explained that two parcels of this project are already in a tax increment district -- Parcel C and Parcel A within Southeast Edina. Her concern was that the City is having trouble maintaining the parks already existing. Commissioner Turner commented that she intended to support the project, contingent upon the EIS and the 494 study. Commissioner Richards introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 1988 AMENDMENTS TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN, APPROVING TAX INCREKENT.FINANCING PLAN 88- 1 AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 88 -1 AND APPROVING THE LAND SALE AGREEMENT AND CONTRACT FOR H.R.A. Minutes March 7, 1988 Page 4 PRIVATE REDEVELOPMENT AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY THEREOF BE IT RESOLVED, by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), as follows: 1. 1988 Amendments to Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan. The HRA and the Edina City Council have previously approved a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.421, subdivision 15, designated as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, and have approved various amendments thereto (as so amended, the "Redevelopment Plan"). It has been proposed that the HRA approve additional amendments to the Redevelopment Plan, designated as the 1988 Amendments to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "1988 Amendments "), which among other things, authorizes the development and admin- istration of an interest reduction program under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.012, subdivision 7, to pay all or a portion of the construction period interest for housing units to be constructed in connection with a redevelop- ment project to be undertaken by the HRA in accordance with the Plan (the "Interest Reduction Program "). 2. Tag Increment Financing Plan 88 -1. In order, to finance the public rede- velopment costs to be incurred by the BRA in connection with the Plan and a redevelopment project to be undertaken by the HRA pursuant thereto, it has been further proposed that the BRA approve a tag increment financing plan, pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, to be designated as Tag Increment Financing Plan 88 -1 (the "Financing Plan"), which establishes a tag increment financing district, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 9, to be designated as Tag Increment Financing District 88 -1 (the "District "). 3. Land Sale Agreement and Contract for Private Redevelopment. It has been proposed that the HRA and the East Edina Housing Foundation (the "Foundation ") enter into a Land Sale Agreement and Contract for Private Redevelopment (the HRA Redevelopment Agreement "), covering a portion of the property subject to the Redevelopment Plan. An outline of the proposed terms of the HRA Rede- velopment Agreement has been presented to this Board. 4. Approvals. The 1988 Amendments and the Interest Reduction Program are described in the document entitled "1988 Amendments to Southeast Edina Rede- velopment Plan" which has been presented to this Board, and the 1988 Amend- ments and the Interest Reduction Program as so described are hereby approved. The Financing Plan and the District are described in the document entitled "Tag Increment Financing Plan 88 -1 of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota" which has been presented to this Board, and the Financing Plan and the District as so described are hereby approved, subject to the execution and delivery by the BRA and the Foundation of'the HRA Redevelopment Agreement. The provisions in the outline of the proposed BRA Redevelopment Agreement presented to this Board is hereby approved, subject to such changes and additions thereto as are approved by the Chairman and Executive Director of the HRA, such approval to be evidenced by the execution and delivery of the HRA Redevelopment Agreement by the HRA. Upon the approval of the form and content of the HRA'Redevelopment Agreement by the Chairman and Executive Director, any two officers of the HRA are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver the HRA Redevelopment Agreement on behalf of the HRA, together with such other documents, agreements and instruments to be executed and delivered by the HRA pursuant to the BRA Redevelopment Agreement. The Executive Director of the BRA and the attorney for the BRA are hereby authorized and directed to proceed with the implementation of the Redevelopment Plan as amended by the 1988 Amendments, the Interest Reduction Program, the Financing Plan and the District. The Executive Director is H.R.A. Minutes March 7, 1988 Page 5 further authorized and directed to request the appropriate authorities of Hennepin County to certify the original assessed value of the District pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177 following (i) approval of the Financing Plan and District by the Edina City Council in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision 3, and (ii) the execution and .delivery by the HRA and the Foundation of the HRA Redevelopment Agreement. 5. Interest Reduction Program. This _Board acknowledges that in developing and approving the Interest Reduction Program it has considered (i) the availability and affordability of other government housing programs, (ii) the availability and affordability of private market financing; and (iii) the need for additional affordable mortgage credit to encourage the.construction and enable the purchase of housing units within the jurisdiction of the HRA. This Board further acknowledges that the approval hereby given to the 1988 Amendments and the Interest Reduction Program authorizes all of the interest reduction assistance payments thereunder whether made prior to or after January 1, 1989. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Commissioner Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Nays: Kelly Resolution adopted. Member Richards then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING 1988 AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN 88 -1 FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 88 -1, MAKING FINDINGS AND REQUESTING CERTIFICATION OF THE'TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 88 -1 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. 1988 Amendment to Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan. This Council and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA ") have previously approved a redevelopment plan and redevelopment project under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.001 to 469.047, designated as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, and have approved various amendments thereto (the "Redevelopment Plan"). At the request of the HRA, this Council held a public hearing on amendments to the Redevelopment Plan in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.029, subdivision 6. The amendments are designated as the 1988 Amendments to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "1988 Amendments "). The 1988 Amendments, among other things, authorize the development and administration by the BRA of an interest reduction program under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.012, subdivision 7, to pay all or a portion of the construction period interest for housing units to be constructed in connection with a redevelopment project to be undertaken by the ERA in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan (the "Interest Reduction Program "). 2. Tax Increment Financing Plan. At the request of the HRA, this Council has held a public hearing on a tax increment financing plan of the HRA, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, designated as Tag Increment Financing Plan 88 -1 (the "Tag Increment Financing Plan"), covering a portion of the property included in the area covered by the Redevelopment Plan. The Tag Increment Financing Plan establishes a tag increment financing district, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 9, designated as Tag Increment Financing District 88 -1 (the "District "). 3. Approvals. The 1988 Amendments are hereby approved. The Tag Increment H.R.A. Minutes March 7, 1988 Page 6 Financing Plan is hereby approved, subject to the execution and delivery by the HRA and the East Edina Housing Foundation (the "Foundation ") of the Land Sale Agreement and Contract for Private Redevelopment (the "HRA Redevelopment Agreement") by and between the HRA and the Foundation. Upon the execution and delivery by the HRA and the Foundation of the HRA Redevelopment Agreement, the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver on behalf of the City the Consent of the City attached to the HRA Redevelopment Agreement, together with such other documents, agreements and instruments to be executed and delivered by the City pursuant to the HRA Redevelopment Agreement. 4. Findings.With Respect to District Constituting Redevelopment District. This Council finds that the District is a redevelopment district within the scope of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 10, for the following reasons: (i) less than 70 percent of the parcels in the District are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities or other improvements, (ii)-as shown by the Real Estate Consulting Analysis dated September 15, 1987, prepared for the HRA by Robert Boblett Associates, Inc., due to unusual terrain or soil deficiencies requiring substantial filling, grading or other physical preparation for use at lease 802 of the total acreage of land in the District has a fair market value upon inclusion in the District, which when added to the cost of preparing that land for development, excluding costs directly relating to roads as defined in Section 160.01 and local improvements as described in Section 429.021, subdivision 1, clauses 1 to 7, 11 and 12 and 430.01, exceeds its anticipated fair market value after completion of the preparation; and (iii) upon the execution and delivery by the HRA and the Foundation of the HRA Redevelopment Agreement, the HRA will have concluded an agreement for the development of at least 50X of the acreage in the District having the unusual soil or terrain deficiencies, which agreement provides recourse to the HRA should the development not be completed. 5. Findings With Respect to Redevelopment Plan. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.028, subdivision 2, it is hereby found that: (A) The land located within the area to be subject to the Interest Reduction Program would not be made available for redevelopment without financial aid sought; (B) The Redevelopment Plan as amended by the 1988 Amendments will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the redevelopment of the areas covered thereby by private enterprise; and (C) The Redevelopment Plan as amended by the 1988 Amendments conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. 6. Findings Under Tax Increment Financing Act. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision 3, it is hereby found that: (A) The District is a redevelopment District as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 10, for the reasons set forth in Section 4 hereof; (B) The proposed development to be undertaken in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan as amended by the 1988 Amendment in the opinion of this Council would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and therefor the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary; (C) The Tax Increment Financing Plan conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole; (D) The Tax Increment Financing Plan will afford maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole for the development of the District by private enterprise; and (E) The City elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, subdivision 3, clause (a). Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney ., H.R.A. Minutes March 7, 1988. Page 7 Nays: Kelly Resolution adopted. RESOLUTION ADOPTED DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY BY PROCEEDINGS IN EMINENT DOMAIN. Commissioner Richards introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: - RESOLUTION DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY BY PROCEEDINGS IN ffiU[NENT DOMAIN BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), as follows: 1. The HRA has previously approved a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.001, subdivision 16, designated as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the 'Original Plan "), and has approved various amendments to the Original Plan, including, but not limited to, an amendment designated as the 1987 Amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "1987 Plan Amendment "), approved by a resolution adopted by this Board on June 15, 1987 (the Original Plan as so amended by the 1987 Plan Amendments and the other amendments to the Plan is herein referred to as the "Plan "). 2. It is hereby determined that the acquisition by the HRA of the following described property which is included in the area subject to the Plan is necessary to carry out the 1987 Project, as defined in the 1987 Plan Amendment, which 1987 Project was approved by the HRA in the 1987 Plan Amendment and constitutes a redevelopment project, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.001, subdivision 14: That part of the East 1/2 of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 32, Township 28, Range 24 lying West of a line drawn North parallel to the East line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 32 from a point on the south line thereof 1659.625 feet West of the Southeast corner of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 32, according to the government survey thereof. 3. The Executive Director of,the HRA and attorney for the HRA are authorized and directed on behalf of the HRA to acquire the property described in paragraph 2 above by the exercise of the power of eminent domain pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 117, and is specifically authorized to notify the owners of intent to take possession pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 117.042. The Executive Director of the HRA and attorney for the HRA are further authorized to take all actions necessary or desirable to carry out the purposes of this resolution. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Commissioner Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. There being no further business on the agenda of the joint meeting of the HRA and City Council, Commissioner /Member Kelly moved adjournment. Motion was seconded by Commissioner /Member Turner and carried. Executive Director RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN; RATIFYING AND AFFIRMING THE EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City "), as follows: 1. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA ") and the Edina City Council have previously approved a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 469.002, subdivision 16, designated as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan "). Acting pursuant to the Plan the HRA proposed to acquire certain land in the area included in the Plan and to sell and transfer a portion of such land to the East Edina Housing Foundation (the "Foundation "), pursuant to a Land Sale Agreement by and between the HRA and the Foundation dated on or as of March 14, 1988 (the "Agreement "). Pursuant to a resolution dated March 14, 1988, the City approved the form of a consent (the "Consent ") by the City attached to the Agreement. Pursuant to such authorization the Mayor and City Manager executed and delivered such Consent. It is now proposed that the Agreement be amended and restated and an Amended and Restated Land Sale Agreement and Contract for Private Redevelopment (the "Amended Agreement ") be entered into between the HRA and the Foundation. The Amended Agreement provides for the execution of a consent by the City (the "Amended Consent "). A form of the Amended Consent is attached as an exhibit to the Amended Agreement. A draft of the Amended Agreement has been prepared and submitted to the City and is hereby directed to be filed with the City Clerk. 2. The execution and delivery by the Mayor and City Manager of the Consent to the Agreement is hereby ratified and affirmed. 3. The form of the Amended Consent is hereby approved subject to such modifications as are deemed appropriate and approved by the city attorney and the City Manager, which approval shall be conclusively evidenced by the execution of the Amended Consent by the Mayor and City Manager. The Mayor and City Manager are directed to execute the Amended Consent upon execution of the Amended Agreement by the HRA and the Foundation. The Mayor and City Manager are also authorized and directed to execute such other instruments as may be required to give effect to the transaction herein contemplated. RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR SOUTH EDINA DEVELOPMENT ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "SOUTH EDINA DEVELOPMENT ADDITION ", platted by Kenneth M. Anderson, Personal Representative of the Estate of Fred W. Hedberg, deceased and unmarried, John W. Hedberg and Jean Hedberg, husband and wife, Michael T. DeCourcy, also known as Michael DeCourcy, and Merry L. DeCourcy, husband and wife, Michael T. DeCourcy as attorney in fact for Donald DeCourcy and Catherine L. DeCourcy, also known as Catherine DeCourcy, husband and wife, Elizabeth T. DeCourcy, an unremarried widow, Cecilia Talbot, a single person, and Bertram Talbot, a single person, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of September 12, 1988, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. ADOPTED this 12th day of September, 1988. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of September 12, 1988 and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 3rd day of October, 1988. City Clerk A. o e � ch .. • �NR7RPON'S'�9 • ass REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL, HRA MEMBERS From: KENNETH . ROSLAND Date: SEPTEMBER 12, 1988 Subject: HEDBERG DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Recommendation: Approval of Resolutions attached. Info /Background: Agenda Item # HRA II Consent 0 Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion See attached memorandum of September 9, 1988. M E M O R A N D U M TO: MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FROM: KENNETH RbSLAND SUBJECT: HEDBERG PROJECT DATE: SEPTEMBER 12, 1988 On September 12, 1988, the Council /HRA will review an overall development plan and final plat for the entire Hedberg property as well as .final site plans for Phase I of the project. At the same time, the Council /HRA will be asked to authorize execution of an Amended Redevelopment Agreement and other documents relative to the project. The following summarizes the major points of these documents. 1. PHASE I LAND OWNERSHIP a. The HRA will purchase the north park, central park, all necessary right -of -way for Minnesota Drive. W. 76th Street, Parklawn Avenue, Edinborough Luray, and France Avenue, and Parcel C. which will be developed with 276 condominium units. b. Private. Private development entities will purchase Parcels B -1. B -2. D and F -3. 2. PHASE I DEVELOPMENT a. The City will agree to grade the property and Minnesota Drive, West to 76th Street, Edinborough Way, and the west one -half of Parklawn Avenue. City costs for this work will be assessed against the Phase I' land including the land acquired by the HRA. b. HRA. The HRA will commit to expend up to $3.8 million toward the development of central park and north park plus it will develop the storm water retention ponds on central and. north park. The HRA will also commit to improvements beneficial to the condominiums such as landscaping, parking lots, utilities and lighting in a manner similar to the HRA improvements undertaken for the Edinborough Condominiums. C. Private. i). Private development will start within sixty (60) days of closing. B -1. A partnership including Gabbert and Beck, will construct a 2,664 seat theatre. B -2. France Med Associates will construct a 106,900 square foot office building.. D. Gabbert and Beck will commence construction of at least one -half of a 200,000 square foot retail complex. ii). Phase I Condominiums will start but not later than June 1, 1989. iii).No specific commencement date is provided for the F -3 office. 3. PHASE 1 - PUBLIC COSTS Land $ 8.0 million Park Dedication $ 1.9 million Special Assessments $ 2.3 million Park & Transit Storage $ 800,000 Park Development $ 3.8 million Pond. Development $ 200,000 Housing Improvements $ 3.0 million Contingencies & Soft Cost $ 1.7 million $21.7 million 4. HRA AND CITY CONTRIBUTION FROM DEVELOPER a) Phase I - Guaranteed Closing $500,000 - First Anniversary of Closing - $1.1 million plus interest - Fourth Anniversary of Closing - $1.4 million plus interest b) Future Phases. Not guaranteed $2.0 million as future phases proceed 5. PARR DEVELOPMENT PRIORITY The HRA agrees that, if affordable, the following park acquisition' and development will be pursued in the following priority. Complete Central Park Complete.west side of North Park Acquire South Park - Construct South Park Complete west side 6. HOUSING PROGRAM The proposed Phase Edinborough. The ma Average Unit Size Average Sale Price'. Range of Prices of South Park I housing program is very' similar -to jor features of the program are as follows: 1,033 sq. ft. $87,848. $60,000 - $111,000 Second Mortgage Pool Direct Subsidy $650,000/phase Second Mortgages $193,000/phase Incomes Served $20,000 - $34,000 7. TAX INCREMENT ANALYSIS The feasibility of tax increment financing for the project has been analyzed using a variety of assumptions. We conclude that adequate cash flows will exist from the present tax increment district and the proposed Phase I development to pay principal and,interest on bonds which will be issued to finance the public costs. This conclusion is based, however, on the assumption that properties in the.tax increment financing district will inflate in value on the average of.at least 2 -3 percent annually and that future changes in the State Property Tax laws will not significantly reduce taxes from the tax increment district. It should be noted that property values in Edina have inflated an average of 7% annually for the past ten (10) years.. If properties did not inflate at 2 -3 percent, or if tax collections were significantly reduced, deficits could result that would require short -term borrowing from the City to the HRA to meet HRA obligations. Even if this occurred, however, we would expect that excess increments would be generated in future years to repay the City. 8. ANALYSIS OF RISKS a) Tax increment adequacy: As noted above, sufficient increments may not exist due to reduced inflation,rates or changes in tax laws. We have attempted to reduce our risk by way, of a Shortfall Agreement and an Assessment Agreement. i) Shortfall Agreement. The Shortfall Agreement guarantees that a minimum tax will be generated from the Phase-I Hedberg development even if elements of the Phase I project are not actually constructed. This commitment is guaranteed ' by Northland Land Company, the parent company of the developer. After completion of each of the Phase I buildings, the - - -- Shortfall agreement terminates as to the completed building and is replaced by the Assessment Agreement. ii) Assessment Agreement - The Assessment Agreement provides that the owner of each of the Phase I buildings will not contest an assessor's estimated market value needed to generate the minimum tax expected to be paid by the building. Assuming that owners actually Shortfall Agreement and the Ass guarantee that the tax increment the Phase I development will however, assume the risk that sufficient to repay bonds. pay their tax bill, the assment Agreement in essence which we are expecting from occur. The HRA /City will, this tax increment will be The 1988 property tax law provides that effective for Payable 1990, the Homestead Credit is scheduled to be repealed and replaced by an,aid program called Transition Aid. Unlike the old Homestead Credit reimbursement program, the Transition Aid' will not be paid to tax increment districts. . Thus, TIF districts with homesteaded property could see a decline in revenues beginning in Payable 1990. It is our understanding the Legislature, intends to change this feature of the new property tax system. At present, however, this should be viewed as a risk to the cash flow of the tax increment district that could result in borrowing from the City. b) Construction of Phase /Developments, In connection with the closing of Phase 1, the private development entities referred to earlier will purchase land at a cost of approximately $5.5 million. Although the developer will execute the Shortfall Agreement noted earlier, there is not an absolute guarantee that the construction of Phase 1 will commence as expected. We believe, however, that the purchase of the property and the execution of the Shortfall Agreement should give the HRA the comfort that the project will proceed. C) Sale of Bonds Before Closing We are attempting to close the Hedberg land sale before October 15, in order to obtain exempt status for real estate taxes payable 1989 for the publicly owned property. In order to close on October 15, the HRA must have proceeds from a land sale. To have such proceeds, the Council must authorize the sale on October 3. If the bonds are sold on October 3, and the Hedberg transaction never closes, the City /HRA may incur negative arbitrage until bonds are callable in ten (10) years (Negative arbitrage results when land proceeds are invested at" a lower interest rate than the bond interest rate). Such negative arbitrage will be financed with excess increments from the existing tax increment district. 9. POST PHASE I Land which is not purchased in Phase 1 is. subject to a non- recourse contract for deed to the HRA which must be serviced by the developer. 'The developer retains an option to acquire and develop future phases of the project. If the developer defaults in keeping the contract for deed in force, the HRA may keep the contract in force and negotiate with another developer. 10. HRA AND COUNCIL ACTIONS The proposed schedule is as follows: September 12, 1988: CITY: Final rezoning to Mixed Development District -6, final plat approval, and final site plan approval for Phase 1. HRA: Approval of amended Redeveloper's Agreement. September 19, 1988: Call for bond sale. October 3, 1988: Open bids and award General Obligation Bonds. Award low bid for Minnesota Drive. October 14, 1988. Closing. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN; RATIFYING AND AFFIRMING THE EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City "), as follows: 1. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA ") and the Edina City Council have previously approved a.redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 469.002, subdivision 16, designated as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan "). Acting pursuant to the Plan the HRA proposes to acquire certain land in the area included in the Plan and to sell and transfer a portion of such land to the East Edina Housing Foundation (the "Foundation "), pursuant to a Land Sale Agreement by and between the HRA and the Foundation dated on or as of March 14, 1988 (the "Agreement "). Pursuant to a resolution dated March 14, 1988, the City approved the form of a consent (the "Consent ") by the City attached to the Agreement. Pursuant to such authorization the Mayor and City Manager executed and delivered such Consent. It,is now proposed that the Agreement be amended and restated and an Amended and Restated Land Sale Agreement and Contract for Private Redevelopment (the "Amended Agreement ") be entered into between the HRA and the Foundation. The Amended Agreement provides for the execution of a consent by the City (the "Amended Consent "). A form of the Amended Consent is attached as an exhibit to the Amended Agreement. A draft of the Amended Agreement has been prepared and submitted to the City and is hereby directed to be filed with the City Clerk. 2. The execution and delivery by the Mayor and City Manager of the Consent to the Agreement is hereby ratified and affirmed. 3. The form of the Amended Consent is hereby approved subject to such modifications as.are deemed appropriate and approved by the city attorney and the City Manager, which approval shall be conclusively evidenced by the execution of the Amended Consent by the Mayor and City Manager. The Mayor and City Manager are directed to execute the Amended Consent upon execution of the Amended Agreement by the HRA and the Foundation. The Mayor and City Manager are also authorized and directed to execute such other instruments as may be required to give effect to the transaction herein contemplated. Dated this day of September, 1988. -- Chairman Attest: Executive Director The motion for-the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted and was signed by the Chairman and his signature attested by the Executive Director. -2- Commissioner following resolution and moved its adoption: introduced the RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN; RATIFYING AND AFFIRMING THE EXECUTION OF VARIOUS AGREEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF VARIOUS OTHER DOCUMENTS BE .IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), as follows: 1. Recitals. The HRA and the Edina City Council have previously approved a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.002, subdivision 16, designated as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan "). Acting pursuant to the Plan the HRA proposes to acquire certain land in the area included in the Plan and to sell.and transfer a portion of such land to the East Edina Housing Foundation (the "Foundation "), pursuant to a Land Sale Agreement by and between the HRA and the Foundation (the "Agreement "). By a resolution adopted March 14, 1988, the HRA approved the form of the Agreement and authorized any two officers of the HRA to.execute and deliver the Agreement on behalf of the HRA with such modifications as are deemed appropriate and approved by the Attorney for the HRA and the Executive Director of the HRA. Pursuant to such authorization the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the HRA have executed and delivered the Agreement to the Foundation, which Agreement is dated on or as of-March 14, 1988. It is now proposed that the Agreement be amended and restated and an Amended and Restated Land Sale Agreement and Contract for Private Redevelopment between the HRA and the Foundation (the "Amended Agreement ") has been presented to and reviewed by the HRA. 2. Approval of Sale of Land. A public hearing on the sale of the Land to the Foundation was held by the HRA on September 12, 1988. The sale of the Land to the Foundation pursuant to the Amended Agreement is hereby approved. 3. Ratification of Execution and Delivery of Agreement. The execution and delivery of the Agreement dated on or as of March 14, 1988 by the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the HRA is hereby ratified and affirmed. 4. Authorization for Execution and Delivery of. Further Documents. The form of the Amended Agreement is hereby approved subject to such modifications as are deemed appropriate and approved by the attorney for the HRA and V r the Executive Director of.the HRA, which approval shall be conclusively evidenced by the execution of the Amended Agreement by any two officers of the HRA. Any two officers of the HRA are directed to execute the Amended Agreement. Any two officers of the HRA are also authorized and directed to execute such other instruments as may be required to accomplish the transaction herein contemplated including but not limited to any amendments or supplements to the Amended Agreement and _other agreements as may be necessary to accomplish the transactions contemplated by the Amended - Agreement. The execution of any such amendments, supplements or.agreements by any two officers of the HRA .shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents by the HRA in accordance with this Resolution. Dated this day of September, 1988., Attest: Executive Director Chairman The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted and was signed by the Chairman.and.his signature attested by the Executive Director. -2 RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR SOUTH EDINA DEVELOPMENT ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "SOUTH EDINA DEVELOPMENT ADDITION ", platted by Kenneth M. Anderson, Personal Representative of the Estate of Fred W. Hedberg, deceased and unmarried, John W. Hedberg and Jean Hedberg, husband and wife, Michael T. DeCourcy, also known as Michael DeCourcy, and Merry L. DeCourcy, husband and wife, Michael T. DeCourcy as attorney in fact for Donald DeCourcy and Catherine L. DeCourcy, also known as Catherine DeCourcy, husband and wife, Elizabeth T. DeCourcy, an unremarried widow, Cecilia Talbot, a single person, and Bertram Talbot, a single person, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of September 12, 1988, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. ADOPTED this 12th day of September, 1988. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of September 12, 1988 and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 3rd day of October, 1988. City Clerk MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL AUGUST- 15, 1988 Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner and Mayor Courtney. UNITED WAY PROCLAMATION PRESENTED. Mayor Courtney presented the following proclamation: PROCLAMATION FOR 1988 EDINA COMMUNITY CAMPAIGN WHEREAS, the United Way of Minneapolis Area currently provides funding to more than 360 programs in 116 agencies, many of which are located in and serving suburban communities. For example, agencies in Edina range from Ebenezer Society, which offers support and training for family caregivers, to the Bloomington Public Health Service which provides a family support program, to Storefront/Youth Action, where victims of physical and sexual abuse can find individual and group counseling; and WHEREAS, the efforts of thousands of community volunteers enable the United Way to maintain fundraising and administrative costs at under ten cents to a dollar; and WHEREAS, in 1988 funds are being distributed to quality programs that reach more people in suburban communities. The United Way works with county planning boards and private planning groups to identify gaps in services in a continuing effort to meet the comprehensive needs of people in the six county service area; BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Council of Edina hereby support the UNITED WAY'S EDINA COMMUNITY CAMPAIGN on September 8, 1988, and encourage local businesses and their employees to participate in this event. PROCLAIMED this 15th day of August, 1988. CENTENNIAL FLOWER GARDEN AWARDS PRESENTED. Perry Anderson, sponsor, presented Centennial Flower Garden Awards to the following contestants: Churches.- Grace Church; Multi- Residences - Point of France and Rembrandt Retirement Community; Residential - Vic /Pat Kreuziger, 6705 Cheyenne Trail;. Jackie Hegman, 4913 E. Sunnyslope Road; Jodi Anderly, 5425 Wooddale Avenue; Myrtle Grette, 5709 -York Avenue; Art /Jackie Nelson, 6628 Brittany Road; Don /Barb Steinkamp, 4912 Payton Court; and Margaret Mullin, 4417 Claremore Drive; Commercial - Marquette Bank. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Kelly to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED ON STORM DRAINAGE UTILITY: ORDINANCE TO BE DRAFTED. Affidavits of notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Engineer Fran Hoffman made the presentation advising that 18,000 notices were sent to property owners in Edina regarding the public hearing on the storm drainage utility. Staff has expended considerable time during 1987/88 reviewing the City's storm sewer system, including pipes, ponds, stormwater detention areas and creeks. Over the years the City has constructed new facilities through the development process and special assessment to project areas. The maintenance needs of the system have increased over the years and the two major rainstorms of 1977 and 1987 suggest a policy review to create an additional movement of floodwaters from private to public areas. Currently, there are four major categories in the Public Works budget: 1) Engineering, 2) Streets (sub- categories: ramps & parking lots, street maintenance and storm.sewer, lakes & ponds), 3) Equipment Operation, and 4) Utilities. It is proposed that the sub - category of storm sewer, lakes & ponds under Streets be transferred under Utilities, similar to the water system and sanitary sewer system which is allowable under State Statute 444.075. The goals of establishing a storm drainage utility would be: 1) to maintain existing storm water facilities so they will operate properly for a longer period of time, 2) provide and improve wetlands to clean storm water and retard flows, and 3) to replace existing storm facilities which could become unusable over the years due to natural deterioration. Obviously, to achieve these goals will cost more than the City is currently expending today on routine maintenance of the system. Construction of any new storm sewer systems will continue to be paid for by the developer (i.e. Hedberg and Carl Hanson properties). The Storm Drainage Utility would be a service similar to the water and sanitary sewer utilities. Fees would be based on the amount of water discharged into the storm sewer system. For example, a parking lot creates more runoff than a grass area of the same size, so commercial, industrial and multiple dwelling properties would accrue higher rates than residential properties. Staff looked at the various lot sizes to determine a basic unit for single.family properties. It was determined that 16,000- 17,000 square feet was the average for single family lots and was the basis used in developing the proposed quarterly fees for various properties as follows: Single Family Homes and Duplexes $5.00 /lot Parks, Cemeteries and Golf Courses $3.36 /acre Schools $15.90 /acre Churches, Institutional and Multiple Family Dwellings $40.35 /acre Commercial and Industrial $67.25 /acre The rate structure was developed around a two-inch rainfall with different types of property having typical percent of impervious surface resulting in a certain amount of runoff. From this information, runoff factors were developed for types of property. The single family rate and runoff were then used as'a standard equivalency factor for development of other rates. The proposed rate table does not reflect any credits on individual properties or reflect any credits for properties still paying special assessments. Staff believes credit be considered for individual properties with large ponds for holding storm water and for those currently paying for previously levied special assessments. It is proposed that properties still paying special assessments not begin paying the utility fee until the special assessment period has expired. Costs for the proposed utility plan were presented as follows: PROPOSED UTILITY PLAN Routine Maintenance (General Fund Transfer) $100,000.00 Replacement /Engineering (Includes Equipment Costs) 200,000.00 Policy Updates (Private to Public Areas) 300.000.00 $600,000.00 Engineer Hoffman stated that Public Works does not propose any projects that would cure last year's rainstorms. However, following that unfortunate experience staff has looked at the areas where storm water stood and also looked at swales, ponding areas and public parks that currently allows water storage but that could be upgraded to lower the potential for flooding in private areas. The results of establishing a Storm Drainage Utility will_be: a) Increased protection for people and property, b) Reduced insurance risks, and-c) Improved property values community -wide. A graphic showing a comparison of the proposed Edina rate structure with the cities of Roseville, Richfield and Apple Valley was presented. Following discussion.and questions by the Council, public comment was heard as follows. Speaking in support of the Storm Drainage Utility were: Don Elwell, 5717 Grove Street; Francis Link, 6415 York Avenue, who presented a petition signed by 74 residents; George Pratt, 6216 South Knoll Drive; Gary Thatcher, 6901 Southdale Road, who asked how projects would be prioritized; Steve Mundy, 5500 Grove Street; Nora Davis, 6921 Southdale Road. Speaking against the proposal were: Leroy Swanson, 6321 Ashcroft Lane; Delois Fechner, 4116 France Avenue; Mark Dahlquist, 5012 Schaefer Road; Walt Sandison, 4612 W. 58th Street, who said schools should be exempt. The following said the cost should remain as an assessment so as to be tax deductible: Chris Glen, 5311 Hollywood Road, who also questioned credits for individual properties; David McDonald, 6929 Southdale Road. The following persons questioned the fee structure: Tim Keen, 3616 W. Fuller Street; Trygve Holl, 5509 Highwood Drive; Glen Carlson, 5908 Code Avenue; Don Cain, 3505 W. 55th Street; Doug Jordahl, 5109 Green Farms Road, representing Colonial Church, who also asked how credit for ponds would be calculated; Bob Shaw, representing Colony Park Baptist Church, who said churches should be in same category as schools; and Malcolm Kindy, representing Creek Valley Baptist Church, who said they were for the proposed utility but questioned why church would pay more than schools. Robert Sykes, 4524 Casco Avenue, stated he was generally for the utility but felt the City should do more to encourage storm water management policy related to land development. For the record, letters in response to the notice of public hearing were received from: Joseph W. Burke, 5113 West 58th Street; Donald G. McMillan, President of White Oaks Improvement Association; Mary A. Matthews, 5402 Xerxes RArenue So.; Robert Fletcher, 4301 W. 42nd Street; David Olson, 7175 Cahill Road; Donald /Bernice Peterson, 6015 Idylwood Drive; Robert /Mary Wenborg, 5801 Creek Valley Road; Richard Maxwell, 5104 W. 58th Street; a letter undated signed Edina Residents; John W. Hedberg, 3725 W. 76th Street; Richard A. Glasgow, 7742 Lochmere Terrace and Richard A. Lind, 5725 View Lane; letters are on file in Engineering Department. No further comment being heard, Member Turner made a motion to approve the storm drainage utility concept as presented and to authorize development of an ordinance for a storm drainage utility with a start date of January 1, 1989. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Member Richards commented that he would support the motion but the Council should be furnished with additional information on two issues: 1) fee structure for schools vs. churches, and 2) tax benefits for citizens. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. Following brief discussion, it was agreed that the draft ordinance and the additional information requested .would be brought back to the Council at its meeting of September 19, 1988. PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED ON TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM NO. P -88 -8 S.A.P. 120 - 166 -01 (HAZELTON ROAD AT BYERLY'S /LEISURE LANE DRIVEWAYS): REQUEST WITHDRAWN BY BYERLY'S. Affidavits of notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Engineer Hoffman informed the Council that Byerly's has appeared before the Edina Traffic Safety Committee requesting consideration on installation of a driveway signal on Hazelton Road at the Byerly's /Leisure Lane western entrances. The firm of Barton /Aschman has completed a traffic study which indicated that a traffic signal would be appropriate and warranted. Byerly's is a high traffic generator and due to the large volume of traffic entering and exiting Byerly's in the one primary driveway, a safety and congestion concern has been raised. To help eliminate this problem Byerly's has attempted various solutions. In early 1986, Byerly's submitted a request for no right turn on red signing,at France Avenue and Hazelton Road to try to improve the ease of access and exiting Byerly's parking lot. Dual outbound lanes were also provided. A request was also submitted to Hennepin County to allow a right -turn in only movement to Byerly's lot off northbound France Avenue, near.72nd Street. That request was denied by the county. They have also considered and followed up on a. proposal to reduce existing problems by proposing an access connection to the Dayton's store parking .lot near the southwest corner of Byerly's parking lot. The change has not been implemented because of cost and its limited ability to correct the continuing problem. Engineer Hoffman advised that Hazelton Road is a state aid eligible ..: street and fifty percent of the signal cost would be eligible subject to state aid approval of the signal warrants study. The other fifty percent of the cost would have to be assessed to abutting property owners. The staff recommendation would be to distribute assessment cost based on traffic generated at the driveways. Past history on traffic signal funding has been as follows: A) Signals on county roads and municipal state aid streets have been funded from City state aid funds with the following exceptions: 1) West 70th Street /Cornelia Drive was 50% state aid and 50% assessed; 2) Driveway signals at Southdale Office Center and Southdale Shopping Center on France Avenue were 100% assessed based on driveway volumes. Engineer Hoffman said that Leisure Lane tenants have called and indicated they do not want to participate in the assessment. Member Kelly asked if the City were to participate with 50% state aid would there be another place that the City could have used these funds. Engineer Hoffman said the fund is fairly large so that this would not sway doing another project elsewhere. Member Turner asked about the location, the appropriateness of this as the solution to the problem and whether there would be a problem of car stacking at the intersection. Charles Rickert, Barton /Aschman, said they were hired by Byerly's to look at the traffic situation and the possibility of a traffic signal. As to stacking, when they - looked at a design for the signal they also looked at a capacity analysis and came up with approximately 150 feet in each of two lanes and concluded there would be adequate stacking distance. If needed, there could be some inter - connect with the signal on France Avenue to continue the movement on Hazelton Road. Member Smith commented that the subject entrance /exit to Byerly's is bad but said he felt there are other solutions to the problem. Verle Poffenberger, of Byerly's, stated that over the years they have tried to do something with the entrance and have added an extra right turn lane in. They have also talked with Hennepin County about getting a right turn only off of northbound France Avenue to relieve the congestion. He said they do not know of any other solution. They have talked with Dayton's Home Store about coming through their parking but that really is not an answer. They feel the answer is the traffic signal which could be programmed according to the traffic volume and that Byerly's would be willing to pay 70% of the 50% cost to be assessed which corresponds to the traffic generated by them. Member Smith commented that he would like to see further study done on what could be accomplished with the site with regard to the problem that is not in the nature of a signal. Member Richards indicated that he would not support public participation in the traffic signal and that if they wanted to pursue the signal it should be assessed 100% to benefitted properties. In response, and based on the comments of the Council, Mr. Poffenberger stated that Byerly's would withdraw the proposal for installation of the traffic signal. He said that, based on the study done by Barton /Aschman, they felt this was the only solution to the problem but that they could not stand 100% of the expense. Albert Kempf, 7101 France Avenue South /Leisure Lane, said he objected to the proposed signal because no one has looked at the situation at Leisure Lane. They are a small place and have no room for stacking lanes at busy times and with a signal it would be even more difficult. No formal action was taken. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR OAK PONDS OF INTERLACHEN 2ND ADDITION. Affidavits of notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Craig Larsen presented the request for preliminary plat approval for Oak Ponds of Interlachen 2nd Addition, generally located west of Blake Road and Fox Meadow Lane extended. The subject property comprises two large lots which front on Schaefer Road; each lot is about 2.5 acres in size and there is a developed single family home on each of the lots. The proposal has been before the Community Development and Planning Commission on two different occasions. At the latest meeting on July 27, 1988, the Commission recommended preliminary plat approval for creation of three new single family lots (Lots 2, 3 and 4) from the rear portions of the Schaefer Road houses. The lots range in size from one -half to three - quarters acre and are approximately 100 feet wide at the building line. The proposed lots are generally larger and wider than the lots in either Oak Ponds of Interlachen 1st Addition or the lots in Taft Addition off Scriver Road. Planning Commission discussion centered upon Lot 4, its shape and ultimate placement of a house on that lot. The revised plat under consideration allows a wider lot area and would allow the house to be elevated at or above the elevation of 942' that has been recommended by the engineers for the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. The Commission recommended that the new house on Lot 4 should have a front street setback similar to the existing homes on Fox Meadow Lane. The house immediately east of Lot 4, (Bob Ulrich, 6221 Fox Meadow Lane) is set back 36 feet. This would be the minimum requirement for the new house on Lot 4. The developer has suggested a setback of between 50 and 60 feet for the house. Planner Larsen said he would suggest a front street setback for Lot .4 of between 36 feet and 50 feet. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the preliminary plat, subject to: 1) final plat approval, 2) subdivision dedication, 3) developer's agreement and 4) Nine Mile Creek Watershed approval and the further recommendation that the house placement on Lot 4 should be the average front yard setback of the houses along Fox Meadow Lane. He noted that Michael Halley, Michael Halley Homes, Inc., was present to answer.questions. Member Richards asked that the issue of the front yard setback for Lot 4 be resolved with Mr. Ulrich, owner of the property directly east of Lot 4. Bob Ulrich, 6221 Fox Meadow Lane, pointed out that there is an existing cul -de -sac in front of his property which the developer has.agreed to remove,, and when the street is straightened out his house will be further from the street. He said he preferred that the setback for the house on Lot 4 be . approximately 50 feet. Planner Larsen clarified that with regard to the front setback Mr. Halley was referring to the street line and that he was referring to the property line which is somewhat set back from the street. Member Richards asked that when this is brought back for final plat approval that Council be advised of the footprint of the proposed house. John Kyllo, 5201 Schaefer Road, said he was concerned about storm water drainage from the proposed development and also where the road would go for future further development in the area. He said that some time ago there was a real concern about getting in and out of the area when the property to the east was developed. Also, there had been a general overall development plan for the entire area which he felt was not being followed now. Planner Larsen explained that the proposed development does allow for future development to the north by continuing the dedicated right of way to the northerly property line. This has been a requirement placed on other developments in the area. A cul -de -sac would provide adequate turnaround for emergency vehicles. Further-, the developer has been asked to provide a storm water plan for the proposed development and the engineers from Nine Mile Creek Watershed District have reviewed the plan and have determined that the area can adequately handle the storm water drainage. Their concern was the relative elevation of the house on Lot 4. He said that there is an existing small pond southwest of Lots 3 and 4 and there is also a pond on the lot immediately north of the subject property. During last year's July storm, these pond areas flooded a large area and had to be pumped down since they have no outlet. Planner Larsen said the City would ultimately be asking for easements to provide outlets for those ponds as further development occurs in the area. The developer's responsibility is to make sure that the impact is not negative on adjacent properties and also that the homes that are built on the new development will not suffer because of storm water drainage. Michael Halley, developer, stated that a storm water management study was delivered to the Planning Commission and that the City Engineer has approved it. Member Smith commented that he was not sure.how much subdivision of these large lots should occur. In response to Mr. Kyllo's concern, Member Richards recalled that there was a plan for development of the area that would allow for the roadway to continue northerly up to Scriver Road and that he assumed that the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval of the proposed subject development adhered to that general plan. Planner Larsen clarified that when talking with any one who is interested in development of the area staff has talked about those overall development options of some years ago and have asked that they demonstrate that they will not cut off those options for development in the future. He said Mr. Halley has shown staff a plan that would allow connecting the road through to Scriver Road which would be one of those options. Member Kelly said she would like to see more detail on how the roadway would be handled. In response, Mr. Halley said that his understanding was, when he developed Oak Ponds of Interlachen, that Fox Meadow Road would eventually head north and tie in with Scriver Road. Topographically that would work and seems to be consistent with a number of plat drawings in that area. Each one of the property owners who may wish to develop their property have to make a conscious decision to allow the roadway.to continue. He said his understanding of staff's concern is to allow flexibility that the road can continue if the next adjacent property owner wishes to see that happen. He explained that the area is densely wooded and is prime in the sense that it is all high.ground and that the proposed houses will be consistently slightly higher than adjacent homes. Also, his goal is to retain as many trees as possible. Mr. Kyllo reiterated his concern for water drainage: and the flooding of the ponds in the area. Member Richards said that although a number of legitimate questions have been raised, he was prepared to move . preliminary plat approval. However, prior to final plat approval Mr. Halley should 1) indicate where the footprint of the house on Lot 4 would be sited, 2) how the existing cul -de -sac would be straightened out and how the roadway would be handled for the proposed development, and 3) that staff make available to anyone interested the storm water drainage plan submitted by Mr. Halley and also determine whether or not a pond would be required on Lots 4 and 5. Member Richards then introduced.the following resolution and moved adoption, subject to 1) final plat approval, 2) subdivision dedication, 3) developer's agreement and 4) Nine Mile Creek Watershed District approval,. 5) siting of the house on Lot 4, 6) detailed plan for the straightening` of the existing cul -de- sac and roadway to the proposed development, and 7) that the storm water drainage plan be available to the public and that a determination be made as to a storm water retention pond for Lots 4 and 5: _Pr . BE IT RESOLVED by the certain plat entitle Halley Homes, Inc. a August 15, 1988 be a Motion for adoption o Rollcall: RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR OAK PONDS OF NTERI CHEN 2ND ADDITION City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota; that that d "OAK'PONDS OF INTERIACHEN 2ND ADDITION, platted by Michael an presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of an is hereby granted preliminary plat approval. f the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Nays: Smith Resolution adopted. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR HED ADDITION. Affidavits of notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen presented the request for preliminary plat approval for the Hed Addition, located at 6625 West Trail, Lot 1, Block 10, Indian Hills. The subject property is a developed single family lot with an area of 79,207 square feet. The proponent has submitted a preliminary plat which would create one new buildable lot. The existing house would remain as it is today. The new lot would contain 34,277 square feet, and the lot for the existing house would contain 44,930 square feet. The new house is proposed to front on Iroquois Trail. Both lots comply or exceed all Zoning Ordinance requirements for single family lots. A graphic of the proposed plat was shown indicating the existing house and driveway and proposed house to be constructed on the new lot. In support of their application, the proponents have submitted an analysis and survey of 40 lots in the western portion of Indians to determine lot size. The existing lot (Lot 1, Block 10, Indian Hills) is the largest in the area and following the subdivision the resulting lots would remain among the largest lots in this area of Indian Hills. Planner Larsen explained that, normally, staff would want to see the property split more evenly than is proposed. However, in this case a more even division of the property would require removing the existing house. The present proposal maximizes the size of Lot 2 while saving the existing house. The entire property is heavily wooded and the existing house is barely visible from the street. A division which would require removing the existing house may disturb the site more than the present proposal. He advised that at its meeting of July 27, 1988, the Community Development and Planning Commission reviewed the proposal and recommended preliminary approval subject to: 1) final plat approval, 2) subdivision dedication, and 3) utility connection charges. He stated that Virgil Hed, proponent, was present to answer questions. Member Smith asked questions about the retaining wall adjacent to Iroquois Trail. Planner Larsen said that it was an existing private retaining wall on the property. Member Smith commented that the lots in the proposed plat are consistent in size with the neighborhood with the exception of the large lots to the east. No other comment being heard, Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved adoption, subject to: 1) final plat approval, 2) subdivision dedication, and 3) utility connection changes: RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR HED ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "HED ADDITION ", platted by Virgil and Sharon Hed, husband . and wife, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of August 15, 1988 be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR EDINA COMMUNITY LUTHERAN CHURCH EXPANSION APPROVED., Affidavits of notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen presented the request of Edina Community Lutheran Church, 4113 West 54th Street, for a conditional use permit. Edina Community Lutheran Church, generally located south of West 54th Street-and west of Halifax Avenue, has applied for a conditional use permit to build a new sanctuary and convert the existing sanctuary into a fellowship hall. The new sanctuary will seat 210 people which is an increase of 23 seats over the present sanctuary. The project includes remodeling the interior of the existing building. The exterior of the new sanctuary will be finished with cedar shakes and stone trim to match the stone on the existing church. The existing building will be re -sided with cedar shakes to match the new addition. Discussion at the Community Development and Planning Commission meeting centered upon where additional parking would be located on the church site. The church property measures 4.73 acres in size. However, much of the area is within the flood plain of Minnehaha Creek. No building or other obstructions may be placed in the flood plain. Consequently, the only buildable area is the northeasterly portion of the site.i All of the proposed construction is above the flood plain elevation. Under certain circumstances, parking could be developed within the flood plain area. However, from staff's point of view it is not a desirable alternative. In looking at other alternatives, it was determined to develop as much - parking as possible on the upper area of the church ground and if parking overflowed the capacity of that lot it could locate on West 54th Street where there is adequate street width for parking on'both sides and very _few homes. The church's proposal calls for rebuilding the existing parking area to the south and west of the church to accommodate 41 cars. The existing parking area is unstriped and accommodates 25 -35 cars. With seating for 210 persons, the Zoning Ordinance requires 70 parking spaces. In order to provide the required parking the church would need to locate the additional parking within the flood plain area. The church has elected to request a parking variance of 29 spaces to avoid disturbing the natural conditions existing adjacent to the creek According to church officials the intent of the addition and renovation project is to better accommodate existing needs and not to prepare for any significant increase in congregation size. The seating capacity increase is very modest and the existing building would benefit from.the proposed renovation. The building design and the soft, natural materials seem appropriate for the site. The Planning Commission members discussed at length.whether to recommend the parking variance and the conditional use permit or to require a proof of parking agreement. The question arose if there is a proof of parking agreement in place and additional parking is required in the future, where would those 29 spaces be located. The answer would be in the flood plain which both the church and staff have been trying to avoid. At its meeting of July 27, 1988, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the conditional use permit, with a 29 space parking variance as recommended by staff, and that the City and church enter into a proof of parking agreement. Planner Larsen stated that the Planning Commission, staff, the church, and neighbors all supported the proposed parking variance to avoid disturbing the flood plain areas on the church property. He explained that staff did not recommend the proof of parking agreement for these reasons: 1) The increase in seating capacity is small, only 23 seats. 2) The flood plain area is the only place to develop more parking. This area is approximately 16 feet lower than the existing parking lot make it undesirable parking. 3) Cars can park on both sides of West 54th Street without disrupting traffic flow. 4) Present church activities have not caused problems for the neighborhood. Planner Larsen said that representatives of the church were present, as well as John Cunningham, project architect. Member Turner asked if all alternatives for parking have been considered. Planner Larsen said there may be room for additional parking in the future if the existing parsonage were removed. Staff also looked at the possibility of a parking bay adjacent to West 54th Street. However, the level of traffic and the existing width of the`street did not seem to warrant that alternative. Staff also looked at public park land on the south side of West 54th Street and west of Minnehaha Creek as off -site parking; however, that is rather remote to the church. Member Smith asked how a proof of parking agreement would be handled. Planner Larsen said the standard procedure with regard to a proof of parking agreement is that the City would hope it would not need to be enforced. The problem with an agreement is if additional parking is proved to be needed the City would require that parking be provided somehow on the site. Here the only place would be down on the flood plain. Planner Larsen added that.the City and church could enter into a general agreement, similar to that with Colonial Church, whereby the church would work with the City to solve parking problems should they occur in the future. Ann Bishop, 5324 Halifax Avenue, asked about the impact of traffic in the neighborhood if both sanctuaries are used to capacity. Planner Larsen explained that the Zoning Ordinance says you calculate the demand on traffic and parking based on the largest use assembly which in this case would be so modest that there would be no noticeable increase in traffic. If in the . future, both structures were used concurrently, it could have some impact. When the City reviews requests for conditional use permits from schools and churches, staff relies on those institutions telling staff how they operate. Mark Brethein, 5429 Woodcrest Drive, said he was supportive of the church's plan and in favor of the parking variance. He said he was concerned about any option to build parking in the flood plain as that would be across the creek from his property. Member Smith commented that he would like to see some kind of agreement with the church regarding future parking needs. Member Turner said she would not support putting parking in the flood plain. She added that the Council has been tough with churches in recent years regarding their parking requirements; that we should not make an exception here and that there should be some type of agreement. Member Richards made a motion.that approval of the Conditional Use Permit for Edina Community Lutheran Church be continued to September 19, 1988 and that staff be directed to bring back an agreement regarding future parking needs for approval before the Conditional Use Permit is granted. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Ayes:. Kelly, Richards,. Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF AUGUST 9. 1988 APPROVED. Because of the number of persons present regarding Agenda Item VIII.A (Approval of Traffic Safety Committee Minutes), Mayor Courtney declared this the next item to be heard. Engineer Hoffman reviewed the discussion held at the Traffic Safety Committee meeting of August 9, 1988 regarding the traffic issues on Halifax Avenue, West 51st through West 54th Streets and the temporary traffic barricade that had been installed ,at Halifax and West 51st Street. He recalled that at the July meeting the Committee had.recommended that the Council conduct a public hearing on this matter to get input from the residents of Halifax Avenue and the affected surrounding neighborhoods. At its meeting of August 9, 1988, the members considered whether other testing should be done between now and the public hearing. He explained that the Committee looks at three aspects when considering traffic issues: 1) engineering, 2) enforcement, and 3) education. A motion was made to leave the barricade in place which motion was defeated. A second motion to recommend the barricade remain and that the Committee cannot determine neighborhood issues or which roadways might be considered neighborhood roadways or neighborhood collector roadways which motion was also defeated. The motion that was passed was to remove the barricade and place large "LOCAL TRAFFIC ONLY" signs on Halifax Avenue, that new traffic counts and statistics be compiled and re- education be assessed before the public hearing on September 19, 1988. In summary, he said the Committee was divided on this issue. Member Smith said that he had observed the area of the barricade, that several cars had driven around it and had entered Halifax and that he questioned the "re- education" of the drivers not to use Halifax. Secondly, he said the barricade does affect the residents of The Lanterns and that they should be contacted. Engineer Hoffman said that residents of The Lanterns have been attending the meetings. Member Turner asked about other alternatives alluded to by Chief Swanson. Chief Swanson said that when this was originally discussed in April there were a number of alternatives suggested including diverters at West 52nd Street, or a barricade at West 54th Street. Of those, only the temporary barricade at West 51st Street was tested with a very predictable result - tremendous reduction of southbound Halifax traffic. The sense of the motion passed by the Committee was to remove the barricade and see what the counts then are. He said he felt the data that could be collected by September 19th would not be adequate because of the short interval. Member Smith said he was in favor of the barricade being made permanent in order to preserve the Halifax Avenue neighborhood. Speaking in support of the barricade remaining and keeping Halifax Avenue as a residential street were John Crist, 5324 Halifax Avenue, who said he was speaking for 22 other people present, and DeVere Brekke, 5221 Halifax Avenue. For the record letters in support of the barricade were received from: Bennett /Mary Jo Porter, 5120 Halifax; Teresa Forliti, 5335 Halifax; Kathy O'Deo, 5325 Halifax; Donna /Jerome Bahn, 5241 Halifax; Lynda Carlson, 5105 Halifax; Ralph /Cloise Oir, 5220 Halifax; DeVere Brekke, 5221 Halifax; Marilyn /Harland Halvorson, 5217 Halifax; Mary /David Thatcher; Karen /Ted Allen, 5216 Halifax; Karen Wylie, 1111 W. 107th Street, Bloomington; Pamela Lien, 4400 W. 58th Street; Sybil Adelson, 146 Marguerite Av., Santa Monica, CA; Mary Karinen, 5032 Halifax; Gail Bolger; Joyce Leach, 4550 Laurel Av., Grants Pass, OR; Daniel /Lori Smiley, 5308 Halifax; Pam Aagaard, 5313 Halifax; Suzie Kuntz, 5125 Halifax; Don Bublitz, 5236 Halifax. Letters in opposition were received from: Thomas M. LeGeros, 5128 Indianola; Marge Kosmos, 5121 Juanita; Frank Bennett, 5436 Brookview Avenue; Nancy Joas, 5129 Indianola. Following more Council discussion, Member Turner moved approval of the following recommended action listed in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of August 9 1988: 1) That the barricade be removed and large "LOCAL TRAFFIC ONLY" signs be placed on Halifax Avenue at West 51st Street, that new traffic counts and statistics be compiled and re- education assessed before the City Council's public hearing regarding this issue; 2) Installation of "NO PARKING OR STOPPING" signs along the 5100 block of Vest 50th Street; 3) That a center line be painted in the curve area of Timber Ridge Road and also that "CURVE" signs be posted; and to acknowledge Sections B and C of the Minutes. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Nays: Smith Motion carried. Member Kelly stated that there is a perceived conflict of interest regarding the next Agenda Item V.C. Final Development Plan - Southdale Center Expansion, and excused herself from the meeting. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVED FOR SOUTHDALE CENTER EXPANSION: SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS. Affidavits of notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen presented the request for Final Development Plan approval for Southdale Center. He advised that The Center Companies, representing Southdale Center have submitted plans for an expansion and renovation of the Center. Since the expansion is greater than 10% of the existing floor area, Final Development Plan approval is required. A detailed description of the proposed project has been provided by the Center Companies. Graphics were presented illustrating the proposed expansion. The project would include the construction of a new Dayton's department store containing approximately 340,000 square feet of gross floor area. The store would be constructed immediately northwest of the present store. The existing Dayton's store would be converted to mall space and new tenant space. This conversion would provide approximately 117,000 square feet of new leasable area in the Center. In addition, all existing common areas and mall areas would be renovated. Three new single level parking decks would be added to serve the expanded Center. The J.C. Penney and Dayton's Garden Centers would be removed. The Southdale Center site contains 3,541,820 square feet or approximately 81 acres. The expanded Center would contain 1,353,263 square feet resulting in a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.38. The PC -3 Commercial District allows a FAR of 0.5. The net addition to the .Center is 191,694 square feet of gross floor area. Southdale currently provides 6,527 parking spaces. The construction of the new Dayton's store would result in the loss of 437 spaces. The project proposed three new single level parking decks containing a total of 882 spaces. Total parking on site would be increased to 6,974 spaces at completion. Shopping centers are required to provide 5 spaces for each 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. Southdale would be providing 5.15 spaces per 1,000 square feet. The existing one -way circulation system at the perimeter of the site would be continued with some modifications to improve flow. The .proposed expansion will require the relocation of the bus - transit . activities from the north to the south side of the Center. The Center Companies has been working with MTC staff to assure a smooth transition.of service. Also, the Center Companies has agreed in principle to allow the Southeast Edina Transit System to circulate through the Center and easements will be obtained to ensure this. Planner Larsen pointed out that three of the four perimeter streets around the Center are not constructed to urban standards. Staff has suggested.that these streets should be upgraded in connection with the Center's expansion. Two of these streets, York and West 66th Streets are county roads, West 69th Street is a City street. Barton - Aschman, traffic consultant for Southdale, has prepared a plan illustrating upgraded streets and modified access to the Center. The plan as presented may require additional rights of way. The proposed expansion would include a substantial upgrading of the existing landscaping and would exceed that required by the Zoning Ordinance. However, additional screening is needed for some parking areas along the east and south property lines. The Center Companies have also submitted, through their traffic consultant, Barton - Aschman, a traffic impact.analysis of the proposed expansion. Engineer Fran Hoffman has reviewed the report and concurs with its findings and conclusions. Planner Larsen concluded that Southdale is now 32 years old and the proposed expansion is intended to preserve Southdale's competitive position in a changing retail climate. Staff feels it is important to the community for Southdale to remain strong and healthy. The proposed renovation of the Center will insure that Southdale will continue to be an asset to the community. Final Development Plan approval is recommended with the following conditions: 1) Staff approval of a landscaping plan and schedule to include additional screening of parking and drive aisles, 2) An access - egress plan for West 66th Street, York Avenue and West 69th Street, including any additional rights of way, acceptable to the City and to Hennepin County for West 66th Street and York Avenue. Specifically, the plan for West 69th Street should be agreed to jointly by The Center Companies and the owners of the adjacent property to the south prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) An easement to allow vehicles of the Southeast Edina Transit authority the right to pass through the Center property. Planner Larsen stated that the plans now presented are the same plans which were informally presented to the Council at a special meeting on July 18, 1988. He noted that Michael Kelly, President and Manager of Southdale Center, was present to respond to questions. Michael Kelly said he had nothing to add to the presentation made by Mr. Larsen. With regard to the upgrading of the surrounding streets, he said they are willing to work with the owners of The Galleria regarding West 69th Street but would not wish to have Southdale.'s project held up while The Galleria is deciding what to do with their site. He said there is enough flexibility on the access - egress plan for Southdale to match their's when they decide what they want. Planner Larsen said the intent was to ensure that some mutually acceptable plan is worked out. Don Brandt, representing Point of France Association, Inc. said their objections to the plan centers around the pedestrian and traffic problems that they are feeling more and more. The 144 families of Point of France find it impossible to cross France Avenue now and the problems they see with additional traffic has been outlined in a letter dated August 12, 1988 to the City. One facet of life at Point of France that will be affected adversely by increased traffic is access to adult education. Because Point of France is relegated to the Richfield School District, those residents who wish to participate in adult educational activities must drive several miles in heavy traffic to reach the Richfield facility; a condition that will be made worse by expansion of Southdale. Mr. Brandt said that, although the Edina Council is not involved in the school district boundaries, they would hope if the Southdale improvement proceeds that they could reach an understanding with the Richfield School District as a result of the increased tax base for the Richfield District that Richfield would release Point of'France.from their school district. Also, Point of France residents now must cross a six -lane highway (France Avenue) for pedestrian access to public transportation or the Medical. Arts building across the street. There are traffic lights at the corner of 66th /France but no sidewalk on the opposite side. Furthermore, the lights change too rapidly for elderly people to make the crossing safely. More traffic to an expanded Southdale will place residents at greater risk. Gary Thatcher, 6901 Southdale Road, said he was concerned about the traffic coming off the Crosstown Highway using Valley View Road as a feeder into Southdale.either by using West 66th or West 69th Streets. The property owners along Southdale Road never had a buffer between their residential district and the commercial district. Now additional expansion of Southdale will increase the traffic and they would like to see some type of buffer. Mr. Thatcher said that in talking with Engineer Hoffman the traffic counts will not be of such nature that it would warrant a sound or visual barrier. He said that issue needs to be addressed. Mr. Kelly said that the traffic r analysis showed that the Valley View extension has additional capacity for traffic which may be diverted into the Hedberg project as it is developed -as an alternative way of moving traffic from the Crosstown Highway and dodging Southdale. The Southdale expansion of less than 200,000 square feet will not "make that much difference with respect to additional traffic on Valley View. Dave Koski, Barton - Aschman, explained that some traffic would come from Valley View but that the amount of traffic the Southdale expansion would add is less than 5% of - the traffic that is on the streets now. He also said he doubted that any type of barrier would be effective. Jim Jenewein, 6905 Southdale Road, and Rick Hauritz, 6613 Southdale Road, also spoke in.support of a visual barrier for the 22 homes along Valley View Road to separate the residential area from the commercial. Engineer Hoffman suggested that through redesign and reconstruction of Valley View Road some berming could be done and that there will be a staff review of that particular area for Council consideration shortly. Member Smith suggested that some additional landscaping might alleviate the visual concerns. Further, that the recent improvement of West 66th Street in Richfield be continued westerly to address some of the pedestrian concerns. He also asked about the possibility of a pedestrian overpass spaning France Avenue. He said he felt it important to retain the visibility of Southdale and that he is in favor of what is proposed. Engineer Hoffman said a pedestrian overpass is an old issue going back to 1980 when it was proposed over France Avenue south of West 66th Street to service both the office site and pedestrians. The question has always been would the facility really be used. Member. - Turner asked about the timing of looking at the redesign of Valley View Road. Engineer Hoffman said it would be within the next two months, but not prior to final approval for the Southdale expansion. Member Turner observed that the traffic study mentioned some York Avenue intersections that would have poor capacity following full build -out of the area and suggested some mitigation measures. She asked how those would be proposed to be funded. Engineer Hoffman said he would expect that West 66th Street/York would be a county project with partial assessment back to benefitted properties and some potential state aid funding. West 69th/York would probably be partially assessed and part state aid funds. As to improvements on West 69th Street, funding would be from state aid funds and assessment. Member Turner said she thought those improvements are important to.maintain good traffic movement around the site and that the second condition to the approval was an important one. One issue brought up that may be put into the access - egress plan or a separate condition is some kind of sidewalk plan. Southdale itself is not pedestrian friendly and the intersection of West 66th and France is very difficult for pedestrians. She said she frequently sees employees from the office building on the west side of France, using the intersection in the middle of the parking lot to go to and from Southdale for lunch. That is a dangerous situation because there is not a sidewalk to stand on while waiting for the signal. She said this is an appropriate time to take a look at ways to improve pedestrian access throughout. Mr. Kelly said there is not an easy solution because the way Southdale and the surrounding - streets are laid out they are not made for pedestrian crossings. Also, there is a relative low density of pedestrians and therefore it is difficult to provide overpasses or underpasses for the kind of density that exists around Southdale in comparison to downtown Minneapolis for example. Anything that would be built would be under used and would not justify the cost. If there is a real demand for movement through this area, The Galleria, the Hedberg project, the hospital and Point of France should connect with the proposed City transit system as a viable alternative. Member Smith asked for a clarification regarding the access - egress plan for West 69th Street being coordinated with the owners of The Galleria prior to issuance of a building permit. Mr. Kelly indicated that if Southdale's timing proceeds faster than that of The Galleria, Southdale did not want to be held up while they decide what they want to do with their site. He said they have met several times but The Galleria owners have not indicated how long it will take them to make a decision. Member Richards commented that it is incumbent upon The Galleria owners, who have received notice of the hearing to approve the plan for.West 69th Street, to speak out on that issue or if the.staff does not feel the plan is responding to the City's needs then the staff will need to state that. Manager Rosland said he felt staff could sit down with The Center Companies staff and The Galleria owners within the next 30 days and resolve this issue. If there was a problem that could not be resolved, the matter could be brought back to the Council. There being no further comment, Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved adoption, subject to the following conditions: 1) Submission by the developer of a landscaping and screening plan acceptable to City staff. 2) Approval by City Council and by Hennepin County to the extent required, of an access - egress plan for hest 66th Street, Vest 69th Street and York Avenue, including necessary rights of way dedication and sidewalk development. The access - egress plan for Vest 69th Street should be coordinated with the owners of The Galleria block if possible and approved by City staff. 3) Execution and delivery of a recordable, permanent easement to allow vehicles of the City's transit system the right to pass through and collect /drop off passengers at designated locations in the Southdale Center property and otherwise to be on terms and conditions acceptable to the City staff: RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR SOUTHDALE CENTER BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota,..that the Final Development Plan for Southdale Center presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of August 15, 1988 be and is hereby approved. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Further discussion was held regarding sidewalks and whether staff could determine what the Council's direction was on the issue. Manager Rosland recommended Final Development Plan Approval for Southdale Center and said that he felt within the next 30 days staff could meet with representatives of Southdale Center and The Galleria to discuss West 69th Street and the sidewalks so more defined information could be brought back for the Council's review. Rollcall: Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. (Member Kelly returned to the meeting at this point on the agenda.) SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS HEARD REGARDING HALIFAX AVENUE TRAFFIC. Harland Halvorson, 5217 Halifax Avenue, stated that he appreciated the diagonal diverter that was placed at Halifax and West 51st Street to reduce the traffic and keep Halifax and the adjacent streets as a residential area. He urged the Council to take affirmative action to reduce the traffic on Halifax. An unidentified gentleman who said he was a doctor stated that there. is a distinct safety issue and a high volume of traffic problem on Halifax and that the solution of the diverter was shown to be effective. He urged the Council to reconsider their action of approving removal of the barricade. Randy Hosler, 5133 Halifax Avenue, said he could not understand why the Council was opposed to the barricade and added that no one who was opposed to it has ever shown at the Traffic Safety Committee meetings. He added that the traffic counts had clearly shown that the barricade was effective in reducing the volume of traffic on Halifax. Mayor Courtney reiterated that this issue would again be considered at a public hearing on September 19, 1988. *BID AWARDED FOR STREET SURFACING WITH CURB & GUTTER (IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -282) FOR APACHE ROAD AND INDIAN WAY WEST IN INDIAN HILLS WEST ADDITION. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for street surfacing with concrete curb and gutter on Apache Road and Indian Way West in Indian Hills West Addition to recommended low bidder, Hardrives, Inc., at $27,365.38. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *AWARD OF BID FOR USED MOTOR GRADER CONTINUED TO 9/12/88. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Kelly to continue award of bid for a used motor grader to the meeting of September 12, 1988. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. GENE DAVIS NOMINATED TO NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT BOARD. Manager Rosland advised that the term of Dr. Eugene Davis on the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Board will expire as of September 29, 1988 and staff would recommend that his named be submitted to the Board of County Commissioners for re- appointment. Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION UHERAAS, the term of Dr. Eugene Davis on the Nine Mile .Creek Watershed District Board will end on September 29, 1988; BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that it hereby recommends and nominates Dr. Eugene Davis to the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners for re- appointment to the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Board and urges the Commissioners to approve the re- appointment. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Courtney Abstained: Richards Resolution adopted. 1988 NLC CONGRESS OF CITIES NOTED. Manager Rosland directed the Council's attention to a recent mailing regarding the 1988 NLC Congress of Cities to be held December 3 -7 at Boston, MA. He suggested the Council give this consideration and said it would be back on the Council Agenda in September for further discussion. *PUBLIC HEARING DATE SET FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Kelly for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARINGS FOR MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. M -88 TREE REMOVAL 114PROVEMENT NO. TR -88 AQUATIC WEEDS IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ -88 STREET IMPROVEMENT NOS. BA -272, BA -273, BA -275, BA -276 ALLEY IMPROVEMENT NO., A -178 STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NOS: L -29, L -30, L -31 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The Clerk and Engineer having calculated the proper amounts to be assessed for the improvements set forth in the Notice of Hearing forms hereinafter recorded, and the amounts proposed to be assessed against the respective lots, places and parcels of land within the districts affected by said improvements, and said proposed assessments having been filed with the Clerk, the same are hereby . approved.and the Clerk shall keep the same on file in her office and open to public inspection pending hearings thereon as herein provided. 2. This.Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the Notice of Hearing form hereinafter contained, to pass upon said proposed assessments and the Clerk's action in publishing notices of said hearings in the official newspaper in accordance with law is hereby approved. Notices being as follows: (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR: MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. M -88 TREE REMOVAL IMPROVEMENT NO. TR -88 AQIIATIC WEEDS IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ -88 STREET IMPROVEMENT NOS.. BA -272, BA -273, BA -275, BA -276 Notice is hereby given that the Edina City Council will meet at the City Hall at 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota on September 19, 1988, at 7:00 P.M. to hear, consider and pass upon all objections, both oral and written, to proposed special assessments for the following improvements: 1. MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. M -88 50th Street and France Avenue Business District The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: All parcels contained within the 50th Street and France Avenue Business District. TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $42,157.67 2. TREE- REMOVAL ASSESSMENT NO. TR -89 The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Lot 10, except highway; AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 176; Lot 6, BRUM'S SUBDIVISION; That part of Lot 1 lying West of East 120 feet thereof except street, Block 4, CODES HIGHVIEW PARR ADDITION;. Lot 5, Block 1, DUBLIN HILL ADDITION; Lot 10, Block 22, FAIRFAX ADDITION; That part of Lot 83 lying South of North 174 feet thereof including adjacent 8 feet of Main Street vacated, MORNINGSIDE ADDITION; Easterly 50 feet of Lot 24 including adjacent 8 feet of Main Street vacated, RILEY'S SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 3,4,5,6,7,30 and 31, GRIMES HOMESTEAD; West 100 feet of East 244 feet of South 150 feet and West 19 feet of South 50 feet of East 144 feet of Lot 18, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARR 2ND ADDITION; Commending at a point in West line of Section 07, Township 028, Range 24, thence North 60 feet, thence West 150 feet, thence South 60 feet, thence East 150 feet to beginning, Block 20, WAVELAND PARR ADDITION.. TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $2,413.50 3. AQIIATIC WEEDS IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ -88 Mill Pond and Indianhead Lake The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: All lots reparian to Indianhead Lake and Mill Pond. TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $14,757.00 4. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -272 Dearborn Court in Dearborn Addition and Blake Woods Addition The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Lots 1 through 4, Block 1, BLAKE WOODS ADDITION; Lots 3 through 8, Block 1, DEARBORN ADDITION. TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS:- $14,230.70 5. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -273 Antrim Terrace in Edina Oaks The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Lots 1 through 5, Block 1, EDINA OARS ADDITION. TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $10,523.33 6. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -275 Green Farms Road and Apple Lane in Parkwood Knolls 22nd Addition The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Lots 1 through 3, Block 1; Lots 1 through 5, Block 2; Lots 1 through 8, Block 3, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 22ND ADDITION. TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS:- $30,992.53 7. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -276 Green Farms Road; Green Farms Court; Interlachen Court and Interlachen Road in Interlachen Heights, and Interlachen_ Road from-Ridge Road Easterly 125 Feet plus or minus. The area proposed to be assessed for said improvements is as follows: Lots 1 through 5, Block 1; Lots 1 through 5, Block 2; Lots 1 through 11, Block 3; INTERIACHEN HEIGHTS; Lot 1, Block 1, C.B. STROTZ FIRST ADDITION; Lot 4, Block 1, SCHWANTES ADDITION. TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS IS: $68,666.30 These proposed assessment rolls are not on file in the office of the City Clerk and are open to public inspection. APPEAL Any owner may appeal the assessment to the District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.081, by serving notice.of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City of Edina within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment by the City Council, and by filing such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. However, no appeal may be taken as to an assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the Clerk of the City of Edina prior to the hearing or- presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. DEFERRAL ON HOMESTEADS OWNED BY PERSONS 65 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, the City of Edina has adopted standards and guidelines for deferring special assessments against homestead property owned by persons 65 years of age or older for whom payment would be a hardship. To obtain deferment, application must be filed with the City.Assessor's office by the close of business on the last business day before the City Council meeting set out in the first paragraph of this notice. For further information and application forms, please call or visit the City Assessor's office. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL. Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR: ALLEY IMPROVEMENT NO. A -178 STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NOS. L -29, L -30, L -31 Notice is hereby given that the Edina City Council will meet at the City Hall at . 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota on October 3, 1988, at 7:00 P.M. to hear, consider and pass upon all objections, both oral and written, to proposed special assessments for the following improvements: 1. ALLEY IMPROVEMENT NO. A -178 West 48th Street between 3913 West 48th Street and 4001 West 48th Street The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: West 65 feet of Lot 18 and Easterly 10 feet of Lot 19, WHITE OAKS FOURTH ADDITION; West 25 feet of Lot 19 and East 40 feet of Lot 20, WHITE OAKS FOURTH ADDITION. TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $2,891.18 2. STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NO. L -29 York Avenue from West 74th Street to West 78th Street The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Outlot A; Lot 1, Block 1, EBENEZER SOCIETY 1ST ADDITION; Lots 3 and 4, EDINBOROUGH ADDITION; Phases 1,3 and 7, VILLAGE OF EDINBOROUGH CONDOMINIUM; Lot.l, Block 1, AL JOHNSON ADDITION; Commencing at a point on East line of Lot 1 distance 177.36 feet South from Northeast corner thereof, thence North 89 deg. 52 min. 23 sec., West 193.87 feet to East line of Al Johnson Addition, thence South to Southeast corner of said Addition, thence West to Southwest corner thereof, thence Southerly and Southeasterly along Westerly line of Lot 1, Block 1, Paul Klodt 1st Addition to most Southerly corner of said Lot 1, thence North along East line thereof to beginning, Block 1, PAUL KLODT FIRST ADDITION; Lot 1, Block 1, YORKDALE TOWNHOMES OF EDINA. TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $33,724.60 3. STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NO. L -30 West 76th Street from - Xerxes Avenue to Edinborough Way The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Lot 1, Block 1, EBENEZER SOCIETY 1ST ADDITION; Phases 6 and 7, VILLAGE HOMES OF EDINBOROUGH CONDOMINIUM; Lot 1, Block 1, AL JOHNSON ADDITION; That part of Lot 1 lying Northerly of the following described line: Commencing at the Northeast E,(�rner of said Lot 1, thence South along the East line thereof a distance of 177.36 feet to a point of beginning of line to be described, thence North 89 degrees, 52 minutes, 23 seconds, West 193.87 feet to East line of Al Johnson Addition and there terminating, Block 1, PAUL KLODT FIRST ADDITION; Lot 1, Block 1,. YORKDALE TOWNHOMES OF EDINA. TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $11,984.15 4. STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NO. L -31 Edinborough Way from York Avenue to West 76th Street The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Lots 1 through 4, Block 1, EDINBOROUGH ADDITION; Phases 1 through 7, VILLAGE HOMES OF EDINBOROUGH CONDOMINIUMS. TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS IS: $51,917.86. These proposed assessment rolls are now on file in the office of the City Clerk and are open to public inspection. APPEAL Any owner may appeal the assessment to the District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.081, by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City of Edina within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment by the City Council, and by filing such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. However, no appeal may be taken as to an assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the Clerk of the City of Edina prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. DEFERRAL ON HOMESTEADS OWNED BY PERSONS 65 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,.the City of Edina has adopted standards and guidelines for deferring special assessments against homestead property owned by persons 65 years of age or older for whom payment would be a hardship. To obtain deferment, application must be filed with the City Assessor's office by the close of business on the last business day before the City Council meeting set out in the first paragraph of this notice. For further information and application forms, please call or visit the City Assessor'.s office. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL. Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *SEWER/WATER RATES CONTINUED TO 9/12/99. Motion was made.by Member Smith and seconded by Member Kelly to continue the agenda item of sewer /water rates to the Council Meeting of September 12, 1988. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *HEARING DATE OF 9/12/88 SET FOR VACATION OF WILLSON DRIVE (EDENMOOR). Motion was made by- Member Smith and seconded by Member Kelly for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION CALLING PIIBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF EASEMENT FOR STREET PURPOSES BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. It is hereby found and.determined that the following described easement for street purposes should be considered for vacation, in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 412.851 and 160.29: That part of Edenmoor Street (dedicated as Willson Drive on the plat of "EDENMOOR,.HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ") lying west of the southerly extension of the east line of Lot 3, Block 3, "EDENMOOR, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ", according to the recorded plat thereof. 2. This Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the form of notice included in paragraph 3 hereof for the purpose of holding a public hearing on whether such vacation shall be made in the interest of the public. 3. The Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and purpose of said hearing to be published once a week for two weeks, in the Edina- Sun, being the official newspaper of the City, the first publication at least 14 days prior to the date of such hearing and to post such notice, at least 14 days prior to the date of such hearing, in at least three (3) public and conspicuous places within the City, as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851. Such notice shall be in substantially the following form: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF EASEMENT FOR STREET PURPOSES IN THE CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, will meet at the Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street on September 12, 1988, at 7:00 p.m., for the purpose of holding a public hearing on the proposed vacation of the following street right of way: That part of Edenmoor Street (dedicated as Willson Drive on the plat of "EDENMOOR, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ") lying west of the southerly extension of the east line of Lot 3, Block 3, "EDENMOOR, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ", according to the recorded plat thereof. All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not the above proposed street right of way vacation is in the public interest and should be made shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the extent to which such proposed street right of way vacation affects existing easements within the area of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric, telephone, or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto, for the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the.extent to which any or all of any such easements, and such authority to maintain, and to enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. MEMBER TURNER WILL NOT SEEK RE- ELECTION. Member Turner announced that she will not seek re- election to the Council. She said the last eight years have been a good experience and that the Council, including past members, the Manager and City staff are the best team in the state. 1989 BUDGET ASSUMPTIONS TO BE CONSIDERED IN SPECIAL MEETING ON 8/18/88. Because of the late hour, it was informally agreed to meet on Thursday, August 18, 1988 at 8:00 a.m. to consider the 1989 Budget assumptions. *CLAIMS PAID. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Kelly to approve payment of the following claims as per pre -li'st dated 8/15/88: General Fund $71,891.78, Art Center $1,240.62, Capital Fund $1,281.05, Swimming Pool Fund $3,354.28, Golf Course Fund $9,811.01, Recreation Center Fund $27.20, Gun Range Fund $377.22, Edinborough Park $5,485.93, Utility Fund $16,708.30, Liquor Dispensary. Fund $929.24, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $491.75, Total $111,598.38; and for payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 8/15/88: General Fund $136,224.12, Art Center $8,125.71, Capital Fund $19,015.00; Swimming Pool Fund $1,545.80, Golf Course Fund $10,779.97, Recreation Center Fund $111,699.18, Edinborough Park $4,117.37, Utility $29,774.61, Liquor Dispensary Fund $93,752.80, Construction Fund $31,202.83, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $1,800.00, Total $448,037.39; and for confirmation of payment of Claims dated 7/31/88: General Fund $408.953.26, Art Center $1,219.87, Swimming Pool Fund $5,363.16, Golf Course Fund $12,884.63, Recreation Center Fund $4,538.87, Gun Range Fund $293.93, Edinborough Park $10,373.98, Utility Fund $48,380.41, Liquor Dispensary Fund $144,021.,00, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $315,125.00, Total $951,154.11. Motion.carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. The meeting was adjourned at 11:25 p.m. by motion of Member Smith and seconded by Member Kelly. Motion carried. City Clerk i �91r1A, cn J , r �o • ' ~�bRPORPRV19 • iBBB , REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland o Agenda Item # II. A. B. C. From: Craig Larsen Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: September 12, 1988 Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: z -87-3, S -87 -11 0 To Council Final rezoning, final plat and Final Site Action ❑ Motion Plan approval for United Properties, ❑ Resolution Hedberg Site. ❑ Ordinance 0 Discussion Recommendation: Approve Overall Development Plan, Final Plat and Final Site Plan for Phase I. Info /Background: The Planning Commission recommended approval at its Aguust 24, 1988 Meeting. Lu"CATION'.-MAP REZONING....& r7t�4,- W?, 1 NUMBER Z -87 -3 and S -87 -11 L O C A TI O N Generally located east of France and north of Interstate 494 REQUEST R -1 Single Family to MD -6', Mixed Development District Preliminary Plat ApprovLl EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT MINUTES ON THE MEETING OF THE EDINA COMMUNITY DEVELAi'MENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 24, 1988 AT 7:30 P.M.,,: EDINA CITY HALT MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM ; MEMBERS PRESENT: Acting Chair Gordon Johnson, Helen McClelland, Del Johnson, Lee Johnson, Geof Qorkinger, John Palmer, Jane Paulus and David Runyan MEMBERS ABSENT: John Bailey, William Lewis, Virginia Shaw STAFF PRESENT: Craig Larsen, City Planner Fran Hoffman, City Engineer Jackie Hoogenakker, Secretary I. OLD BUSINESS Z -87 -3 United Properties & Hedberg Site S -87 -11 R -1 Single Family to MD -6 Mixed Development District South Edina Development Company First Addition Mr. Larsen presented his staff report noting changes to the proposal since preliminary approval. Changes made are loss of the proposed health club, minor changes to the park (i.e. relocation of the park building), reduction in square footage in retail and office space and reduction in the number of housing units. Mr. Larsen reported Phase I includes 276 housing units, 201,000 square feet of retail space, 107,00 square feet of office space, and an eight screen theatre. Peter Jarvis, Dennis Sutliff, BRW., Inc., Larry Laukka, Dick Anderson, Laukka Development Company, Warren Beck, Gabbert and Beck, Lance Norderhus, Eagle Enterprises and Mrs. and Mrs. John Hedberg were present. Commissioner G. Johnson asked Mr. Jarvis if roadway completion of Minnesota Drive would be completed during Phase I development. Mr. Jarvis responded the majority of roadway improvements would be completed during or before the development of Phase I. Mr. Hoffman added these improvements include the completion of Minnesota Drive, rebuilding West 76th Street and France Avenue, construction of Edinborough Way and Parklawn Avenue. Mr. Hoffman added Hennepin County forecasts 1990 as completion of improvements along France Avenue. Commissioner G. Johnson questioned Mr. Jarvis about the previously discussed skyway option. Mr. Jarvis explained the skyway option has remained, but not as part of Phase I. He added the skyway system has received mixed reviews and remains a City policy decision. Mr. Jarvis pointed out the proposed transit system may eliminate the need for a skyway system. r . 4 Commissioner_.D..:Johnson questioned if the loss of the health club and replacing it with retail would increase traffic. Mr. Jarvis said the final site plans reduction in density from what was originally proposed has reduced traffic between 18%-19 %. The elimination of the health -club and the addition of retail should not create any additional traffic concerns. Mr. Jarvis -noted there is an _.option that the -lower level of one of the proposed retail buildings may be leased by a health club for aerobic classes, nautilus machines, weights etc., but not courts. Commissioner Runyan asked Mr. Jarvis to explain the water feature of the park. Mr. Jarvis said this aspect of the project was carefully and thoroughly studied. It was found that ponding areas should be constructed with an 8 foot depth sloping to 4 feet around the perimeter. This depth reduces the possibility of the formation of algae. The ponds bottom and sides will be composed of a synthetic material and covered with a 6 -8 inch layer of sand. Mr. Jarvis noted that further study is required between them and the City if boats will be allowed on the ponds. Continuing Mr. Jarvis said the DNR has indicated they will approve the ponds being maintained by a well. This will insure a constant water level. Mr. Jarvis also noted the possibility of using the ponds as an irrigation system. a A discussion ensued regarding possible parking problems that may occur as a result of high use of the park. Mr. Jarvis explained the 2 proposed pedestrian bridges from the housing project to the park should eliminate the need for those residents to use a vehicle to get to the park. Mr. Jarvis added he feels parking for the park will be adequate. Mr. Laukka presented to the Commission renderings of the proposed housing development. Highlights of the proposed housing are as follows: 1) Six U shaped buildings totaling between 240 and 276 housing units. 40 -48 units per building. 2) Proposed square footage of the units range in size from 700 square feet - 1,650 square feet. 3) Anticipated market price of the units are between $60,000 - $135,000. It should be noted that the proposed units are slightly larger than the units at Edinborough. 4) Option of an elevator. That option will be based on what the market dictates. 5) The materials of the proposed housing will be brick (brick per building may be 30 %) and vinyl siding. 6) Central air - conditioning as opposed to wall air conditioning units. Commissioner Paulus asked Mr. Laukka the time frame for the build out for the housing units. Mr. Laukka said he anticipates the project to be completed within 3' -4 years depending on the market, interest rates, etc. Commissioner Paulus asked if complete development of the park depends on completion of the housing. She added she has some concern regarding this if the market becomes "soft" for condominiums. Mr. Laukka said the park can be completely developed without completion of the housing project. He added he feels very positive about the proposed housing. Mr. Dennis Sutliff briefed the Commission on the proposed medical office building. He explained it will consist of six stories but visually it will appear as five (one story is below grade). The "materials will be constructed of reflective glass with concrete The parking allocation for the proposed medical office building is 600 vehicles. The proposed.office building will be composed _T._. of between 25 -28 suites. Commissioner G. Johnson asked for clarification of the roadway route for the proposed "jitney ". Mr. Sutliff with graphics traced the route of the jitney which will connect the Hedberg site with Edinborough, Southdale, Galleria and the Southdale Medical Building. Commissioner Paulus moved to recommend final rezoning approval and final site plan approval for Phase I subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Palmer seconded the motion. All were in favor. Motion carried. II. ADJOURNMENT: The-meeting was adjourned at 9:05 p.m. 1 n Hoogenakker, Sec tary__— _ __ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AUGUST 24, 1988 Z -87 -3 United Properties & Hedberg Site 5 -87 -11 R -1 Single Family to MD -6 Mixed Development District South Edina Development Company 1st Addition The City Council granted preliminary rezoning and preliminary plat approval for the subject development on October 12, 1987. The developers have now submitted plans for and are requesting approval of their Overall Development Plan and Final Site Plan approval for Phase I of the development. The Council will also be asked to grant final plat approval. Several things have happened since the project was granted preliminary approval. First, the Council has approved the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the development. Second, the HRA and the East Edina Housing Foundation have approved and executed a redevelopment contract with the developer. Third, the Zoning Ordinance has been amended to address this type of development. The amended Ordinance allows retail as a permitted principal use in the MD -6 district. For a project of the magnitude state law requires the Pollution Control Agency (PCA)'to issue an Indirect Source Permit (ISP) to insure the development does not violate air and noise pollution standards. The PCA staff is scheduled to issue this permit on August 19, 1988. The Overall Development Plan continues the same mixture of uses contained in the preliminary plan. However, the intensity of the uses has been reduced. The overall FAR for the project has been reduced from 0.95 to 0.77. The table below illustrates the changes to the plan. Use Housing Low Rise High Rise Total Office Preliminary Plan Square Feet or Dwelling Units 970 530 1,500 5 Buildings 1,500,000 Retail Includes Health Club 343,700 Hotel (Final) Overall Development Plan Square Feet or Use Dwelling Units Low Rise 682 Mtd /High Rise 403 1,085 Office 5 Buildings 1,256,900 Retail No Health Club but with theatre 240,650 Hotel In Bloomington 250 Rooms In Bloomington 250 Rooms Phase I Phase I is comprised of the following uses: Parcel B -1 Theatre: 39,050 Square Feet 8 screens and 2,644 seats Parcel B -2 Medical Office Building: 106,900 Square Feet Parcel C 276 Units of Low Rise Condominium Housing Parcel D General Retail: 201,600 Square Feet Phase I will also include acquisition of the central and north park areas. In both areas the pond will be excavated. The west side and the amphitheater will be completed in the central area. The east side will be graded but the mini golf and court games will be developed later. The west edge of the north park maybe developed in Phase I. The east side will not be completed until a later phase. Phase I will include the construction of Minnesota Drive, West 76th Street and portions of Edinborough Way and Parklawn Avenue. The widening of France Avenue is expected to coincide with Phase I development. Phase I Housing, Parcel C, is similar to the Edinborough condos. There are, however, some important differences. First, the units are larger and have more varied floor-.plans than in Edinborough. The project proposes 11 unit types ranging in size from 1,000 to 1,417 square feet in area. The units are one or two bedroom with one plan offering two bedrooms plus a loft. The buildings have been designed to accommodate elevators if the market requires them. The exterior treatment will emphasize brick. Each building will have 46 units with construction of the southwesterly building scheduled for a spring 1989 start. Due to the size of the development and the diversity of uses it will not be possible to use a common exterior treatment throughout the project. Although there will be design review for each project or phase, the development will be tied together by a common landscape architectural treatment. This will include the type, location and size of landscaping materials, as well as sidewalks, lighting and signage. The southeast Edina transit way continues to be included in the development. Vehicles would run along the westerly edge of the pond. The actual vehicle type is still being studied. It will be a small, 20 -30 passenger, gas or electric vehicle. It may resemble a street car, but with rubber tires. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Overall Development Plan and Final Site Plan approval for Phase I. The proposed uses are consistent with the approved Preliminary Development Plan. The overall intensity of the development has been reduced. The tax increment district has been expanded to include the entire project and all other conditions of preliminary approval have been satisfied. PRELIMINARY REZONING TO MDD -5 MIXED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND PRELIMINARY PLAT GRANTED FOR HEDBERG SITE (UNITED PROPERTIES). Manager Rosland recalled that the G C• public hearing held October 5, 1987 on the request of United Properties for \�� preliminary rezoning to MDD -5 Mixed Development District and preliminary plat for \�\�� the Hedberg site had been continued so that the developers and staff could provide additional information on issues raised by the Council. The two major issues discussed were: 1) the public park, and 2) the housing concept. Public Park - He noted that the park design is not finalized at this point and that this unique park is intended to compliment the indoor park at Edinborough. Manager Rosland then presented a comprehensive review of the proposed public park and explained the various areas for the recreational activities which would be used by the entire community in the winter as well as during the summer months. The main feature that would attract and bring people to the park is the path that would encompass the water component. He said it is designed to provide recreational opportunities for individuals and families that are not available in the existing public park system. Cultural and performing arts events could take place in the amphitheater area on the west side of the pond. In conclusion, he said that the goal is to design something that meets the needs of the residents and will be good for the whole City. Member Kelly said that she was not totally sold on the idea of an amphitheater as. it would mean more maintenance and programming costs. She said that in looking at the various cost figures for the project there is no provision for depreciation as for the City's other enterprises, e.g. Braemar Arena, Art Center, Gun Range. She also expressed concern about additional liability for the City because of the water element and that according to the Police Department report approximately 40% of the calls come from southeast Edina. Manager Rosland responded that the policy has been that depreciation on those enterprises have never been funded and that only the operating fund losses are funded. As to liability he said there are existing parks now such as Cornelia which have water and that it is possible that insurance premiums may go up some because of this added facility. Regarding emergency calls from the southeast Edina area, that is mainly because of the concentration of commercial and senior population in that quadrant. Emergency services to that area will have to be strengthened and that is the purpose of the monthly fees and the contribution to the operating trust fund. Member Smith commented that he still has not seen what it is that will bring people to the proposed park. He asked if it would be a civic kind of activity or the sell that you would not have to bike down to Lake Harriet because the City now has a large passive park in Edina that would attract residents to the park. He also asked how much public parking would be available for individuals who wish to use the park and why there is a need for a park office building. In response, Manager Rosland said that it would be both, that this park will be programmed to coordinate with Edinborough activities and that it would fill the need to go to an area like Lake Harriet. Parking would be shared with the office and commercial areas which would approximate 2,000 spaces. The recreational building would have multi -uses, e.g, warming house in the winter and other uses in the summer months. As to upkeep of an ice skating area, he said it would not require the maintenance expense that is associated with the upkeep of hockey rinks. Member Richards asked what the scale is of the green space surrounding the water, both on the residential side and the commercial side. It was explained that the green space from the water to the residential /commercial ranges from 50 feet to 125 feet in depth, and that the total water area is just over 10 acres in size. .Boyd Stofer, representing United Properties, pointed out that the two bridges over the water are grade separated which permit the park to operate as a continuous event without having to cross the public streets. He added that one of the important concepts behind the park is the formality of it, not necessarily the volume of it and that approximately one -third of the total site is devoted to the public park. It was designed as a formal arrangement with a lot of intricate areas for people to gather. Housing Concept - Larry Laukka made the presentation on the housing concept for the project summarized as follows. The concern expressed by the Council was for a broadening of the mix of housing potentials in the Hedberg site versus what was accomplished in the Edinborough project. He reviewed the planning process for the Edinborough project and explained the development of the public park concept in the mixed use project; a public use that would allow the developers to bring office, elderly, rental and for sale people together in a hub manner with the park as a basic, formal separation that would also allow them to inter -act with one another. The cultural side (performing and fine arts) is yet to be developed and can be done tangentially at the Hedberg site and will provide for the community what Edinborough does not have. A social fabric needs to be established in the Edinborough communities so that they participate in the park programs and become involved in it. Mr. Laukka said he could foresee the same thing happening at the Hedberg site but in an entirely different fashion. There is an opportunity for a full arena of recreational choices for not just the young people in the community but for everyone else. There is a need to work towards the cultural side of Edina's recreational and play activities. In summary he stated that we need to go to work on the Edina cultural need and that we should use these developments to try to make it happen. In reference to the public park, Member Richards interjected that the private sector has moved faster than the public sector in the project development; that he was troubled by someone saying that a lineal park with an average of 75 feet in depth around the water element is the right dimension for the public component of this proposed project. He said that as he has spoken to other Council members he is troubled that he doesn't know and has to know before the public sector can move hand in hand with the private sector. He said time has been spent in trying to analyze what the private development will be without fully understanding what the public development is going to be. Mr. Laukka submitted that more time has been spent by the project development team on the 24 acre park element of the project than with anything else on the master plan. Lists have been generated, discussions and arguments have taken place about what should be there and how the public park would work. He said his position is that without that kind of facility in mixed use developments he is out of it. He said people would not buy into an. environment that doesn't work. The lineal park with the water body will be in-an urban setting that is dense and is vital to the success of the project. Mr. Laukka added that he has asked the project team to place all the housing on the east side of the water by an exchange of the housing on Site B -1 with the proposed office building on Site E -2. He said he feels that makes sense so that all the housing is on the east soft edge of the water. As to the park and the programming of it, he stated that he felt it was not possible to design a successful program today that would deal with all the needs of the community and that the park will have to be flexible. That is the purpose of the soft edge; it is a place for the residents of the project to come out in the sun. The hard edge is the commercial side of the project, very urban, and an active side where people will go to work, to a movie, to a restaurant, etc. and then leave. He noted that people are coming to the Edinborough Park because it is there and that they are using the facility. Mr. Stofer said that what we are really talking about is a concept - does it make sense and has it been thought through so that it can go forward and be developed successfully. Secondly, the project has to be looked on as a whole package. It isn't just a park but is a mixed use project that involves 1500 housing units, 1,500,000 square feet of office space and the commercial development which through the vehicle of tax increment financing will pay for a public amenity like this and bring something back to the community. It is 90 acres that is master planned and, when put in this kind of concept and under the HRA's control, will enable the City to choose its destiny in southeast Edina as opposed to letting development happen. Returning to the housing concept, Mr. Laukka said he had not designed a package of housing for the project. They looked initially at the continuation of the market served at Edinborough which had specific mandates which have been served. It is felt that it can be carried on into the Hedberg project in much the same manner. There is a strong market for the first time home buyer under age forty, that earns less than $38,000. There will likely be a rental facility zone that will be moderate to luxury rental housing. A third market will be aimed at: a) the empty nester, 40 -55 years old, wanting living space in excess of 1,000 square feet, 2 bedrooms plus, spending range of $125/140,000, and b) moving residents out of east Edina, the Morningside area or the far east side to free up those modest homes. He said both of these markets will be researched as to their potential and that they will have to proceed cautiously in determining those potential buyers. Marketing of the housing units will be done by means of a model of the project so that potential buyers can actually see how the entire project will look. Member Smith asked if the housing units would be mixed. Mr. Laukka said that the moderate and the up scale units would be mixed and would be an architectural requirement for the project. Member Turner commented that one-of the objectives of the mixed use development is to provide affordable housing for people who work in the area and that we should not lose sight of that. Mr. Laukka responded that in Edinborough 25% of the residents work in either Edina, Richfield or Bloomington and that 8% are retired. In looking at the continued development of the I -494 corridor, he said that communities need to look at putting a housing component into the typical commercial development. Data from European and West Coast examples supports the fact that people are victims of convenience and want to live close to where they work and in the nicest community they can afford. No further comment being heard, Member Turner moved preliminary rezoning to MDD -S and preliminary plat approval, subject to conditions: 1) Final rezoning," final plat approval, and the granting of a Conditional Use Permit for retail sales, 2) Amendment of the Zoning Ordinance to allow the development pursuant to the master plan as approved by the Council, 3) Approval by the Council of an Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed development, and 4) Execution of a redevelopment contract between the developer and Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority as approved by the Council, with First Reading of the ordinance and adoption of the resolution as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A20 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825) BY ADDING TO THE MIXED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PRD -5) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 6 or Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding the following thereto: "The extent of the Mixed Development District (Sub - District MDD -5) is enlarged by the addition of the following property: Tract A: Parcel I: The South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 32, Township 28 North, Range 24, except the West 50 feet thereof, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Abstract Property. Parcel II: The Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 32, Township 28, North, Range 24, except that part platted as Eden Place Addition; and except the West 50 feet thereof; and except that part described as beginning at the Southwest corner of said Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4; thence North along the West line thereof a distance of 43.0 feet; thence East parallel with the South line of said Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 a distance of 50 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence South parallel with the West line of said Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 a distance of 10.0 feet; thence East parallel with the South line of said Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 a distance of 10.0 feet; thence Northwesterly on a straight line to the actual point of beginning, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Abstract Property. Parcel IV: - The West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 32, Township 28 North, Range 24, except the West 50 feet thereof; and except that part described as beginning at the Northwest corner of said Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4; thence South along the West line thereof a distance of 43 feet; thence East parallel with the North line of said Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 a distance of 50.0 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence North parallel with the Vest line of said Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 a distance of 10.0 feet; thence East parallel with the North line of said Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 a distance of 10.0 feet; thence Southwesterly on a straight line to the actual point of beginning, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Abstract Property. Tract B: Parcel II: That part of the North One -half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 5, Township 27, Range 24, described as beginning at a point on the North line thereof 1304.875 feet West along said North line from the Northeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 5; thence West along said North line 354.75 feet; thence South, parallel to the East line of said Northwest Quarter, 475.5 feet; thence Northeasterly to a point which is 327.7 feet South along a line drawn parallel to the East line of said Northwest Quarter from the point of beginning; thence North along said last described parallel line to the point of beginning, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota. And That part of the South One -half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 32, Township 28, Range 24, described as beginning at a point on the South line thereof 1304.875 feet West along said South line from the Southeast corner of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 32; thence West along said South line 354.75 feet; thence North, parallel to the East line of said.Southvest Quarter, to the North line of the South One -half of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 32; thence East along said North line 354.75 feet, more or less, to an intersection with a line drawn North, parallel to the East line of said Southwest Quarter, from the point of beginning; thence South along said last described parallel line to the point of beginning, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate in Hennepin.County, Minnesota. Being registered land as is evidenced by Certificate of Title No. 388764." Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT - FOR UNITED PROPERTIES BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "(Name to be determined)" platted by United Properties, a division of The Northland Company, a Minnesota corporation, and presented at the special meeting of the City Council of 12, 1987, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval. Motion for preliminary rezoning and plat approval was seconded by Member Smith. Member Turner commented that she supported the development because it is exciting, it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the amended Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan and specifically the area goals to ameliorate traffic congestion, achieve housing, accomplish the storm water holding pond and the park, but also an opportunity to develop the last major piece of property in the City in a unique manner that benefits the whole community. She stated that prior to final, approval she will look for a resolution of these major concerns: 1) Traffic Area -' that in Phase I the four road improvements mentioned in the BRW traffic report would be constructed, that Travel Demand Management methods would be included, that the sidewalks as now shown on the master plan would be constructed, that the transit way would be specifically defined, and that in Phase II the project would be subject to the I -494 Corridor Study recommendations and may have to be staged to match capacity in the I -494 corridor or some traffic mitigation methods to accommodate traffic generated from the site; 2) Housing Area - that in Phase I there be a mix of housing that would include affordable housing for those who would work in this area; 3) City Services - that services be self- supporting. She added that she liked the idea of the theatre use and the proposed hotel because both those uses would be off -peak trip generators and complimentary to the office buildings. Member Smith commented that he hoped the developers would do everything they could to enhance recycling in the development; that in order to draw people to the park it should be convenient and look like more space rather than proprietary space for the neighborhood; and that the project should make a dramatic statement. Member Kelly indicted her support for the project and said that a fine development team has been put together,.that there is a good mix of uses, that she hoped it would develop as a world class statement, that she had reservations about mixing the housing, that she was not ready to commit to a programmed park and that the project should not be rushed. Member Richards said he shared Member Kelly's concerns and would support the project with reluctance although he was not sure the footprint of the development is a good one that we can live with. Mayor Courtney then called for a rollcall vote on the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney First Reading granted; resolution adopted. The meeting was adjourned by Mayor Courtney at 9:00 p.m. City Clerk �gI13A, ch Nry �y° • RPON.t� ,BOB REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland From: Craig Larsen Date: September 12, 1988 Subject: Appeal of a Board of Appeals decision for B -88 -8, Masica 6817 Valley View Road Recommendation: Agenda Item # 111 • A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Uphold Board of Appeals decision to deny the variance. Info /Background: This variance was twice heard by the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, March 17 and August 18, 1988. The variance request was denied by the Board on August 18, 1988. The proponents are requesting a 16 foot front yard setback variance. They would like to maintain a 34 foot setback from Valley View Road for the new house. The required setback is 50 feet. The Board found that no hardship existed and that there was an adequate building pad available while observing the 50 foot setback. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS HELD ON THURSDAY, AUGUST 18, 1988 AT 5:30 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM MEMBERS PRESENT: Helen McClelland, John Bailey and Jane Paulus I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Mr. Bailey moved for approval of the April 21, 1988 Board of Appeals and Adjustments Meeting Minutes. Mrs. McClelland seconded the motion. All were in favor. Motion carried. II. OLD BUSINESS: B -88 -8, Masica, 6817 Valley View Road Mr. Dommer reminded the Board in March of this year the proponent submitted a plan for a new dwelling which proposed a 22 foot front yard setback. The dwelling was nearly 3 stories tall at the closest point to Valley View Road. The item was heard before the Board of Appeals where the proponent withdrew the plan and indicated a revised plan would be proposed. Mr. Dommer added the revised plan plan illustrates a 34 foot front yard setback which is the same setback as the home which is to be removed. The height'of the building at its closest point has been reduced to two stories. The garage has also been redesigned and has been pushed further into the hill on the east side of the property. Mr. Dommer explained the required setback of 50 feet has not changed since the original proposal. The required setback is an average of the homes between intersections on the southeast side of Valley View Road. The range of setbacks used to determine the average is between 30 feet and 74 feet. The proponent, Mr. and Mrs. Masica were present. Mr. James Van Valkenberg, attorney representing Mr. and Mrs. Masica was present and Mr. William Devlin, architect was present. Mr. Van Valkenberg pointed out to the Board the unusual shape of the lot. He explained if the conforming setback is applied it would be almost virtually impossible to develop due to the unusual shape and topography. The useable buildable portion of the lot is minimal. Mr. Masica explained if the conforming setbacks are applied the site would have little rear yard. He added the rear yard would only extend '60 feet back. Mr. Van Valkenberg added the neighbors are in agreement with the proposal and have - voiced no objections. Mr. William Devlin, explained the reason for difficulty in house placement is due to the existing location of the driveway. The existing drive location must be implemented into the proposed design because of the steep topography. This hardship necessitates creativity in house placement. Mr. Masica pointed out the grade of the hill in the front is at 22 feet. Mrs. McClelland said in viewing this proposal she finds no hardship that would support approval of the requested variance. Mrs. Paulus added Edina has • very few undeveloped lots available. She pointed out that presently there seems to be a pattern emerging in Edina of purchasing homes and raising them. All new construction must_ then conform to existing City standards. Mrs. Paulus noted in this instance she cannot find a hardship for violating the required front yard setback. Mr. Devlin reminded the Board the..existing drive poses a problem - - --- -for the Masica's; adding the existing drive in a sense is a hardship. Another aspect of this variance that should be considered is that in reality the Masica's are requesting a side yard variance. Mr. Dommer clarified that statement by responding that regardless of site placement of the home the front setback is considered as that which is perpendicular to the right of way. Mr. Masica added he feels the proposed setback is not out of character for the neighborhood, continuing that it is not unreasonable to want to construct a home that has a large enough rear yard to be enjoyed by its owners. He pointed out there are trees that should be preserved and in the future a swimming pool may be constructed. Mrs. Paulus responded there are options that may have to be considered by the proponent if a large year yard is important, one is that the topography of this lot may make it virtually impossible to have a large enough rear yard for entertaining and to support a pool, since this issue is important to the proponent the square footage of the house's footprint may have to be reduced to accommodate this need or a complete redesign may have to be considered. Mrs. McClelland said the City must also be careful when granting approval that an unwanted precedent is not established. The Board carefully studies each case, and pays careful attention to requests for front yard setback variances, the steep topography of this site is not unusual for houses in Indian Hills and Mrs. McClelland said she believes a house can be more creatively placed that does not require such an extensive variance. Mrs. Masica said she understood that each variance requested is considered on its own merits and individuality. Mr. Bailey responded that each variance request is considered individuality and each case is unique but in this instance in my opinion a hardship cannot be found, sacrifices may have to be made either in elimination of the pool, or reduction of the footprint or a complete redesign, but it should be noted that topography in some instances dictates that not all lots can be developed to meet the day to day living needs of the property owner. Sacrifices may have to be made and options reconsidered to develop this lot appropriately and within City standards. Mrs. Paulus moved for variance denial. Mr. Bailey seconded the motion. All voted aye. Motion carried. Mrs. McClelland informed the Masica's their option to appeal this decision to the City Council. NUMBER LOCATION REQUEST B -88 -8 6817 Valley View Road A 28 foot front yard setback variance to construct a new dwelling EDINA PLANNING D� =ARTME THOMSEN NYBECK JOHNSON BOUQUET •VAN VALKENBURG OHNSTAD & - SMITH, P.A. LAW OFFICES SUITE 600, EDINBOROUGH CORPORATE CENTER EAST 3300 EDINBORO UGH WAY, MINNEAPOLIS (EDINA), MINNESOTA 55435 - (61 2) 835 -7000 . GLENN G. NYBECK DONALD D. SMITH OF COUNSEL: GORDON V. JOHNSON MARSH J. HALBERG JACK W. CARLSON JOHN K. BOUQUET DENNIS M. PATRICK RICHARD D. WILSON, P.A. JAMES VAN VALKENBURG ._ PHILIP SIEFF STEVEN J. OUAM MARK G. OHNSTAD - HELGE THOMSEN, RETIRED. JOHN R. PRAETORIUS, RETIRED August 22, 1988 Mr. Philip, S. Dcmmer Associate Planner City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 RE: James G. and Linda M. Masica 5817 Valley View Road D -88 -8 Dear P ",i 1 : This is our formal notice of an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals on August 18, 1988. I would appreciate it if You would forward me a copy of the Order as finally entered by the Board. Council? When would you guess this would be heard by the City If it could be heard on either Sept,elnber«:"tr 19th that would be fine. I also am aware of the fact that on the 19th they have a long agenda and it might be that you would prefer to have it on the 12th. In otherwords we would like to get this heard and resolved. Yours tr 1 JVV:jd a s Van Val urg cc: Mr. James Masica M E M O R A N D U M TO: Edina Board of Appeals and Adjustments FROM: Philip S. Dommer, Associate Planner DATE: August 18, 1988 SUBJECT: B -88 -8, Plan Revision James G. and Linda M. Masica 6817- Valley View Road In March of this year the proponent submitted a plan for' a new dwelling which proposed a 22 foot front yard setback. The dwelling was nearly 3 stories tall at the closest point to Valley View Road. The item was heard before the Board of Appeals where the proponent withdrew the plan and indicated a revised plan would_be proposed. . The revised plan has been submitted and is attached. The plan illustrates a 34 foot front yard setback which is the same setback as the home which is to be removed. The height of the building at its closest point has been reduced to two stories. The garage has also been redesigned and has been pushed further into the hill.on the east side of the property. The required setback of 50 feet has not changed since the original proposal. The required setback is an average of the homes between intersections on the southeast side of Valley View Road. The range of setbacks used to determine the average is between 30 feet and 74 feet. Please refer to the attached new plan, and the March 17, 1988 meeting minutes and the original staff report. REVISED "NEW" PLAN SIoPE'D - .7. L10), s— -� -: ---- qgb 1 1 lo' IL -'- N DENOttS 'pRopo$�U �{a,Se` �iIIBF =s DeaotES Exs:sf:��6. Hcl„SE 24PosE0 6L6Vi17110N5 XXY - OENoTES EX /5T /NG ELEV,4T /oN " Fto o - (M) - DENOTE S PROPOSED EL6YAT/O/l - ,06NOTE5 O /RECT/oN CF FLOW / i- FouNoATioN- oP SuRFAcE OR.4INAUE n /� AREA i LOT SIZE: 33, 88LA SQ q3 -ISE.: SIZE: :OVERAGE: �-- q)q {L xO t ---_ IN I 91-:zv :.' Q . ,,� •:J ., �. g39f - by ; 9 - _ .. - . Z.0 9 --- •r EXISTING -a Q Gar h i•FSE .4 N cjk�s3 ,..- SIoPE'D - .7. L10), s— -� -: ---- qgb 1 1 lo' IL -'- N DENOttS 'pRopo$�U �{a,Se` �iIIBF =s DeaotES Exs:sf:��6. Hcl„SE LLLrj]�M rLAn m V m 4-1 t; m z m EO 0] 00�� 00�� u mill n`-AS ci,, -yai�2n m m. OC ra m v -z m r a z r 54.LE: I••= Zp� ' 0.� = ° °SGO 6LEV.a TioNS ]•XY OE,vo:TES EX/57 /NG EL�Vi. T�oN ' GA^rAGE P,:pc,C- (�'v� OEh'JTL -S P,.�JPJSEO c(E Y,-1 T.'On/ %c4° OF iJUNO.a r,'ON. �' - Gdn'J T6 21W,: ZT•,oN cr- FLOW c•' SuRFAcE OC.i ///aCwE AREA LOT SIZE: 33, Sati HSE. SIZE: lo COVERAGE: \ BUILDABLE AREA 00 y9\ N b �1 0 ;r / X39 {1' I i � S � try �?- o � qjy •• J1 MIS.00 EDINA BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS STAFF REPORT MARCH 17, 1988 , B -88 -8 James C. and Linda M. Masica 6817 Valley View Road Part of Lot 41 Braemar .Hills Zoning: R -1 Request: A 28 foot front yard setback variance to construct a new dwelling. The subject property is currently developed with a 1 1/2 story dwelling and a detached, garage. The proponents desire to remove the dwelling and garage and construct a new home. The proposed location of the new dwelling is 22 feet from the front property line. The required setback is determined by an average of the homes be the closest intersections on the southeast side of Valley View Road. The calculated average is a 50 foot setback. The greatest setback is -74 feet, the least is 30 feet. The existing dwelling which is to be removed has a 34 foot setback. The lot is heavily wooded and has some sloping topography. In the center of the site, however, a large building pad exists within the required setbacks and between slope lines. See Figure 2. In fact, the proposed dwelling could fit within this area if it were rotated counter clockwise. One advantage to the lot is that the building pad is set up above the street grade about 20 feet and is wooded. This helps reduce the impact of a reduced setback. In this instance, however, the structure is a full three stories at its closest point and will rise substantially over the street. Refer to the photograph in Figure 3 of the existing dwelling which is 12 feet further back than the proposed dwelling. RECOMMENDATION Staff recognizes that the setbacks used to determine the requirement vary greatly and therefore under certain circumstances, it, would be reasonable to relax the setback requirement. Under the current propoa, however, the plan is not based. on any unusual circumstances at, the site and substantially alters the character of the neighborhood. Staff would therefore recommend denial of the request. r L OR.�. °OSLJ 6GE V.3TioN$ YXY - DENOTES EX/ST,�N.: ECE Vr7 T /oN Lowesr Fc.xc•- 4�R,.a4e ToP Of i0[/NOAT,•oN- - G6NOTc 5 .� /,r: =CT . N 0- F;: O LV of AREA LOT SIZE: FT HSE. SIZE: COVERAGE: n� o� �r "N z /VA - -Z►= -- \ r / / 1 ��= I -4-88-8' James G. and Linda M. Masica C- 6817 Valley View Road GJ Part.of Lot 41 Braemar Hills �\ Request: A 28 foot front yard setback variance to construct anew dwelling. - Mr. Dommer told the Board the subject property is currently developed with a 1 1/2 story dwelling and a detached garage. The proponents desire to remove the dwelling and garage and construct a new home. The proposed location of the new dwelling is 22 feet from the front property line. Mr.. Dommer explained the required setback is determined by an average of the homes between the closest intersections on the southeast side of Valley View Road. The calculated average is a SO foot setback. The greatest setback is 74 feet, the least is 30 feet. The existing dwelling which is to be removed has a 34 foot setback. Mr. Dommer pointed out the lot is heavily wooded and has some sloping topography. In the center of the site, however, a large building pad exists within the required setbacks and between slope lines. See Figure 2. In fact, the proposed dwelling could fit within this area if it were rotated counter clockwise. One advantage to the lot is that the building pad is set up above the street grade about 20 feet and is wooded. This helps reduce the impact of a reduced setback. In this instance, however, the structure is a full three stories at its closest point and will rise substantially over the street. Refer to the photograph in Figure 3 of the existing dwelling which is 12 feet further back than the proposed dwelling. Mr. Dommer concluded staff recognizes that the setbacks used to determine the requirement vary greatly and therefore under certain circumstances it would be reasonable to relax the setback requirement. Under the current proposal, however, the plan is not based on any unusual circumstances at the site and substantially alters the character of the neighborhood. Staff would therefore recommend denial of the request. Mr.. Masica the proponent and Bill Devlin of Harvey Homes was present. Mr. Masica explained to the Board the reasons for the needed variance request is to maintain the character and symmetry of the neighborhood and work within the elevations of the property. He added a large reason for the request is to construct a new dwelling and retain a back yard., Mr. G. Johnson pointed out the previous footprint could be used as a guideline for the proposed house. Mrs. McClelland told Mr. Masica the Board is very strict about granting front yard setback variances-when they are self imposed. Mrs. McClelland commented that the request for a 2$ foot front yard setback is below the City's current front yard setback standard. Mr. Bill Devlin of Harvey Homes explained to the Board the reason for difficulty in home placement is due to the current driveway placement adding the easement for the existing driveway must be used. Mr. ioI-aiu Uric iLUiL rree: disturb the existing vegetation and maintain a rear ya3 Mr. Devlin pointed out the neighbors in the area also ( fruit trees removed. Board members told Mr. Masica a have to re- design the placement of the house to conforn of the land, the present houses footprint and maintain standards. Mrs. Paulus commented the square footage of reduced to allow Mr. Masica the vegetation and the reaz property. Mr. Lewis agreed with Ms. Paulus observatior have to be worked out due to the topography of the lot setback in the neighborhood. Mr. G. Johnson said at tr Masica has three options if the Board recommends denial decision for denial to the City Council, 2) withdrawing time to redesign the house. or, 3) having the item tab before this Board at a later date, which would allow ti on Lne property, not d for use by his family. o not want to see the nd Mr. Devlin they may more with the topography front yard setback the house may have to be yard he desires for this adding a compromise may and the established is time he feels Mr. 1) appeal the the request, allowing Led, to be brought back ne for redesign. Mr. Masica withdrew his request stating he needs time to redesign the house to better fit the topography of the lot. Mrs. McClelland moved to accept Mr. recommendation if Mr. Masica requests to Adjustments within a one year time frame $50.00 variance fee will be waived. Mr. in favor. The motion carried. II. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 6:10 p.m. Masica's withdrawal with the appear before the Board of Appeals and from. this date (March 17, 1988) the Lewis seconded the motion. All were �a in hoogenakker, Se- e�retary 5- C� _ ch O REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Recommendation: Approve Lot Division. Agenda Item # III. B. Consent Fx� Information Only ❑ Mgr . Recommends [] To HRA 0 To Council Action Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Info /Background: Fairview Hospital has purchased 20,814 square feet of excess Crosstown highway right of way from Hennepin County. This action will allow the transfer of the land from the County �to the hospital. To: Kenneth Rosland From: Craig Larsen Date: September 12, 1988 Subject: LD -88 -9 - Fairview Southdale Hospital, BTO Deve. 6401 France Avenue So. Recommendation: Approve Lot Division. Agenda Item # III. B. Consent Fx� Information Only ❑ Mgr . Recommends [] To HRA 0 To Council Action Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Info /Background: Fairview Hospital has purchased 20,814 square feet of excess Crosstown highway right of way from Hennepin County. This action will allow the transfer of the land from the County �to the hospital. I-OCAT30PI MAP I NUMBER LD -88 -9 L O C A TI O N Fairview Southdale Hospital 6401 France Avenue EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF PRESENT: Philip Dommer, Jackie Hoogenakker P.C. MEMBERS PRESENT: Bailey, L. Johnson, D. Johnson, McClelland, G. Johnson, QLewis, Runyan, Palmer, Paulus, Workinger. �1, LD -88 -9 BTO Development Corporation Fairview Southdale Hospital Healthcare Services Corporation 6401 France Avenue South Mr. Dommer informed the Commission Fairview Southdale Hospital and Healthcare Services Corporation is applying for a simple lot division of their property to annex approximately 20,814 square feet from the Hennepin County C.A.S.H. Number 62 right -of -way. This is necessary to maintain appropriate setbacks between the parking ramp and the crosstown highway. Mr. Dommer concluded staff recommends approval. Mr. Allan Hill representing BTO Development Corporation was present. Commissioner L. Johnson moved for approval. Commissioner Workinger seconded the motion. All were in favor. Motion carried. EDINA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SEPTEMBER 7, 1988 - - - LD -88 -9 BTO Development Corporation Fairview Southdale Hospital Healthcare Services Corporation 6401 France Avenue South Fairview Southdale Hospital and Healthcare Services Corporation is applying for a simple lot division of their property to annex approximately 20,814 square feet from the Hennepin County C.A.S.H. Number 62 right -of -way. This is necessary to maintain appropriate setbacks between the parking ramp and the crosstown highway. Recommendation Staff recommends approval. \ - AS —BUILT SURVEY FOR / r» J 1++� uw wwwr SOUTHDALE PHYSICIANS DEVELOPMENT ASSOC. 4" CIO n�.. 1.•. M...0 1 t w1 I_u Y •EMI a twuuNU u n N .w.r `\ / • /y IwA Ipy " M,•bM.NNI .N M N . ` MI / \�j• a •.Ir lr u•L - - - 63TN lTReET Ar.•r� u+rw w w.+.w w 0%o".1 - - ri:iilii Rr... ELnnm GAwa. Irrt n:.:. i.11w .... I►1..., i.1.... .R.1.rw •.... a..rr• r..... Y.�iii i:.:..""..:" ;.� •»� ••• •• •••r• �.•• -a• r w..r � .rrw wmn.luas s�Iwr.r.r .�. ���IIW i PROPERTY TO K ACQUIRED TOTAL 4KA- 0.479r � 20614 • ORIGINAL i / >•' TOTAL AREA-13.24— h TOTAL BLDG AREA•16 45MO ( (! f -� � � � MIw111 M 1•w/.. � �: n .rr.r w• �m JI a'''te .,,.. a oTS x _...... ,...._........ " l a I . •.Ir lr u•L - - - 63TN lTReET Ar.•r� u+rw w w.+.w w 0%o".1 - - ri:iilii Rr... ELnnm GAwa. Irrt n:.:. i.11w .... I►1..., i.1.... .R.1.rw •.... a..rr• r..... Y.�iii i:.:..""..:" ;.� •»� ••• •• •••r• �.•• -a• r w..r � .rrw wmn.luas s�Iwr.r.r .�. ���IIW Legal Description for Fairview Southdale Hospital That part'of Lots 2 and 3, Cassin's Outlots according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying northerly of West 65th Street, southerly of County Road No. 62, westerly of the west line of Lot 1, Block 1, SOUTHDALE ACRES, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and easterly of France Avenue South RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute various separate parcels: Parcel A: That part of Lots 2 and 3, Cassin's Outlots according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying northerly of West 65th Street, southerly of County Road No. 62, westerly of the west line of Lot 1, Block 1, SOUTHDALE ACRES, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and easterly of France Avenue South and Parcel B: That part of Parcel 1, 2 and 3 as described in Certificate of Title number 608806 lying within highway easement Doc. No. 576247 described as a 25 foot strip and a 50 foot strip adjoining a 125 foot parallel line described in said easement , which lies southeasterly of a line drawn parallel with and distant 50 feet southeasterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the West line of Section 29, Township 28 North Range 24 West, distant 1107.1 feet north of the West 1/4 corner thereof; thence run easterly at an angle of 74 degrees 24 minutes (as measured from north to east) for a distance of 124.1 feet; thence deflect left along a tangential curve having a radius of 1527.89 feet (delta angle 19 degrees 23 minutes) for a distance of 516.9 feet; thence tangent to said curve for a distance of 30 feet; thence deflect left along a tangential curve having a radius of 716.2 feet, (delta angle 16 degree 59 minutes) for a distance of 212.3 feet; thence tangent to curve to the intersection with the base line of said 125 foot parallel line; thence northeasterly along said 125 foot base line of parallel line to the east line of said parcel 3 and there terminating. WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to combine said tracts into the following new and separate parcel: Parcel A and Parcel B as described above WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said parcel as a separate tract of land does not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance Nos. 801 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcel as'a separate tract land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said conveyance thereof as a separate tract of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no subdivision be made of said Parcel unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. ADOPTED this 12th day of •September, 1988. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) . COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 12, 1988 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 16th day of October, 1989. Marcella. M. Daehn City Clerk �1 o e ,, 0 i�, �� •'��RPoP�'S£O • BB8 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland Agenda Item $# III. C. From: Craig Larsen Consent - Information Only ❑ Date: September 12; 1988 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: S -88 -7, Berenberg To Council First Addition, Lot 1, Block 1, Hilldale Action [] Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: , Continue public hearing to October 3, 1988. Info /Background: Due to a conflict with a religious holiday; Mr. Berenberg has requested we reschedule the hearing on the proposed subdivision for October 3, 1988. Staff has notified neighborhood representatives of this change. o ,,e,, ch -may 1eee REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Francis Hoffman�/') City Engineer V Date: 9 September, 1988 Subject: Vacation of Willson Drive on Plat of "Edenmoor" Recommendation: Approve vacation of street. Info /Background: Agenda Item # Ty-A. Consent 0 Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Action ❑ Motion R] Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Lots 1, 2, and 3 of Block 3, Edenmoor plat (see attached) is being replatted by Harvey Swenson. This replat has been granted preliminary plat. The south end of Lot 3 had excess right -of -way which is not necessary for the new replat. The new roadway will be on the north side of Lot 3. All utility companies find the vacation request acceptable. The City staff recommends approval subject to final plat being granted. 4,9S�.rti ° 0 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00 DATE: 8 September, 1988 _ AGENDA ITEM VI. A. ITEM DESCRIPTION: (1983 or Newer) Used Hydraulic Articulated Motor Grad Company Amount of Quote or &d 1• Ziegler, Inc. 1 - $ 67,000.00 2. Carlson's Lake State Equip. 2. $ 82,500.00 3. Carlson's Lake State Equip. 3. $ 90,680.00 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Ziegler, Inc. $ 67,000.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This purchase is to replace a 1958 Huber -Warco grader. The purchase price for this used piece is excellent and the condition is excellent for our City use. A comparable price for a new piece similar to this unit would be $115,000.00. This purchase would be funded from the equipment replace- ment fund. The Recommended bid is X within budget not Public Works - Streets Department Kenneth Rosland, City Ilin, Director M E M O R A N D U M TO: Fran Hoffman, Director of Public Works FROM: Gene Bartz, Superintendent of Public Works SUBJECT: Used (1983) Caterpillar Motor Grader DATE: August 30, 1988 On Wednesday, August 24, 1988, Steve Johnson, Purchasing Agent; Clyde Brown, Shop Foreman; Dave Adams, Operator and I inspected a 1983 Caterpillar Motor Grader with Tom Reddin, Area Manager for Ziegler, Inc. We were all extremely.impressed with the quality of the machine. The grader showed no sign of wear due in part, I'm sure, to the fact that it has always been housed indoors. The only change I foresee would be 2 new tires on the left side of the machine which would bring the machine into accordance with our specifications. Mr. Reddin of Ziegler, Inc. agreed that such a change would be possible. Taking into account the aforementioned comments, I feel the subject machine would be a definate asset to our fleet and recommend its purchase. GB: jr A. ° ' REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor •& City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE 8 September, 1988 AGENDA ITEM vI • s ITEM DESCRIPTION: One Ton Pavement Roller Companv 1. Ruffridge Johnson Equip. Co., Inc. 2., Aspen Equipment 3. 4. 5. Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $ 5,843.00 2. $ 6,120.00 3. 4. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Ruff ridge Johnson $ 5,843.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This purchase is to replace a'1960 Rosco pavement roller. This unit will be purchased through the equipment replacement fund. The unit being replaced no longer can be repaired due to lack of available parts. Si ature The Recommended bid is --�- within budget not Public Works - Streets Department Kenneth Rosland,'City Manager Director e I _)C; REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: KEN ROSLAND,-MANAGER From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Date: SEPTEMBER 9, 1988 Subject: TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE FOR EDINAMITE Recommendation: Agenda Item # VTT.A Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends To HRA To Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance That the Council approve issuance of a temporary On -sale Liquor License to The Edina Foundation in. connection with EDINAMITE to be held on October 15. Info /Background: The Edina Foundation has applied for a temporary On -sale Liquor License in connection with EDINAMITE to be held at Edinborough Park on October 15, 1988. The application complies with .the_ requirements of Ordinance No. 902 concerning a temporary on -sale liquor license in connection with The Edina Foundation Ball and will be issued under the license of Interlachen Country Club. e o � REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Date: SEPTEMBER 9, 1988 Subject :APPOINT11ENT OF GENERAL /CI ELECTION JUDGES Recommendation: =Agenda Item # VII . B Consent 0 Information Only ❑ Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑� To Council Action ❑ Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance 0 Adoption of the attached resolution appointing election judges for the General /City Election to be conducted on November 8, 1988. Info /Background: Minnesota Election Law 204B.21, Subd. 2 states that election judges for precincts in a municipality shall be appointed by the governing body of the municipality. The names on the attached resolution have been selected lists approved _ by Senate District 42 Chairs pursuant to Statute 204B.21, Subd..l.and, pursuant to 204B.19, Subd. 5-which requires party balance. RR- g0T.TTTT0M BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the following election judges be appointed to serve on the election boards for the General /City Election be held on November 8, 1988, and that the City Clerk be and is hereby authorized to make any substitutions or additions as may be deemed necessary: (See list attached) PROPOSED GENERAL ELECTION JUDGES November 8, 1988 PRECINCT 1 - Shepherd of Hills Church - 500 S. Blake Road 1. Eugenia Williams, Chair 6425 Mendelssohn La. (55343) 938 -5086 2. Lois Hallquist 305 Grove Place (55343) 938 -5886 3. Dorie Capetz 6304 Waterman Ave. (55343) 935 -5724 4. Arlene-Friday 6525 Belmore La. (55343) 933 =4464 5. Virginia Vonhof 414 Harrison Ave. (55343) 935 -1126 6. Audrey Krengel 405 Blake Road (55343) 936 -9358 7. Barbara Anderson 413 Arthur St. (55343) 938 -1160 8. Celia Nightingale 306 Monroe Ave. (55343) 938 -1621 Shirley De.Leo 609 Waterman Ave.(55343) 938 -3859 10. 'Ruth Amdahl 309 Griffit St. (55343) 935 -8760 PRECINCT 2 - Edina City Hall - 4801 W. 50th St. 1. Marjorie Ruedy, Chair 5048 Edenbrook Ave. (36) 922 -2712 2. Pauline Carroll 4836 Rutledge Ave. (36) 920 -1304 3. Joan Flumerfelt 5225 Division St. (36) 929 -2114 4.- Kathleen Saterbak 4505 Oxford Ave. (36) 929 -1287 5. Suzanne Hirsch 5345 Division St. (36) 925 -1448 6. Elizabeth Anfinson 5290 Villa Way (36) 929 -2251 7. Naomi Johnson 5140 Bedford Ave. (36) 929 -0975 8. Sara Kirkman 4350 Brookside Ct. (36) 926 -0535 9. Maryann Haemig 5032 Bedford Ave. (36) 929 -1145 i 10. Dianne Gens 4801 Rutledge Ave. (36) 929 -3176 PRECINCT 3 - Edina Covenant Church - 4201 W. 50th St. 1. Linda Smith, Chair 4519 Bruce Ave. (24) 929 -4620 2. Carol Bucklin 4908 Sunnyside Rd. (24) 922 -2072 3. Deidre Hedrick 4521 Wooddale Ave. (24) 926 -2428 4. Marie Goblirsch 4611 Wooddale Ave. (24) 927 -5871 5. Patricia Dill 4601 Edina Blvd. (24) 922 -4879 6. Kathleen Stiehm 4520 W. 44th St. (24) 929 -2055 I. 7. 8. Barbara Bergan 4801 Woodhill Way .(24) 926 -1141 Jane Andrews 4526 Arden Ave. (24) 922 -4236 9. Christine Morgan 5006 Bruce Ave. (24) 920 -3407 10. Marie Vorlicky 4514 Drexel Ave. (24) 920 -6026 PRECINCT 4 - Morningside Municipal Bldg - 4005 Grimes Ave. 1. Shirley Dibble, Chair 4101 W. 44th St. (24) 926 -4048 2. Rachel.Schoening 4014 Monterey Ave. (16) 922 -5457 3. Margery Brothers 4310 Eton P1. (24) 922 -4914 4. Virginia Courtney 4313 Eton P1. (24) 922 -8523 5. Marion Cracraft 4227 Alden Dr. (16) 922 -6632 6. Jeanette Lushine 4166 Monterey Ave. (16) 926 -0576 7. Joanne Downey 4113 Kipling Ave. (16) 922 -7745 8. Sharon Hegstrom 4244 Lynn Ave. (16) 922 -7858 9. Marianne Schoenecker 4218 Scott Terr. (16) 927 -8039 10. Betty Goughnour 4828 Townes Rd. (24) 922 -1402 PRECINCT 5 - Cahill School (formerly Highlands School) - 5005 Doncaster Way 1. Carol McPheeters, Chair 5409 Doncaster Way (26) 929 -4742 2. Rosemary McGlynn 4909 Rolling Green Pkwy. (36) 927 -5124 3. Phyllis Cooper 5500 Mirror Lakes Dr. (36) 925 -1594 4. Betty Benjamin 5205 Duncraig Road (36) 929 -0941 5. Mildred Karr 5121 Lake Ridge Road (36) 938 -9283 6. Susan Little 5423 Highland Dr. (36) 933 -4981 7. Carol Ledder 5409 Chantrey Rd. (36) 929 -5920 8. Marjorie Grinnell 6101 Idylwood Dr. (36) 935 -9213 9. Helen Groth 5300 Ayrshire Blvd. (36) 929 -8485 10. Diane Kirkland 4 Circle East (36) 926 -5977 Proposed General Election Judges , November 8, 1988 Page Two PRECINCT 6 - Countryside School - 5701 Benton Ave. 1. Jane Bains, Chair 6101 Tracy Ave. (36) 2. Catherine Swanson 5804 Merold Dr. (36) 3. Mary Cleaveland 6204 Crest Lane (36) 4. Barbara Herbers 5801 Stuart Ave. (36) 5. Susan Zwakman 6109 Ridgeway Rd. (36) 6. Sherrill Borkon 5913 Sun Road (36) 7. Marjorie Borrman 5701 Wycliffe Rd. (36) 8. Gertrude Rocheford 9428 Merold Dr. 9. Eleanor Westerberg 5816 Amy Dr. (36) 10. Donna White 6016 Tracy Ave. (36) PRECINCT 7 - Normandale Church - 6100 Normandale Rd. I. Bess Brudelie, Chair _ 6412 Gleason Ct. (36) 2. Helen Peterson 6121 Code Ave. (36) 3. Naomi Ward 4350 Brookside Ct. (36) 4., Kathleen Engquist 6212 Wyman Ave. (36) 5. Gertrude Snoeyenbos 5125 Valley View Rd. (36) 6. Eunice Overby 5004 Kent Ave. (36) 7. Delores Paul 6009 Tingdale Ave. (36) 8. Avalda Wildermuth 6005 Birchcrest.Dr. (36) 9. Donna Hunter 5821 Tingdale Ave. (36) 10. Darlene White 5320 Windsor Ave. (36) PRECINCT 8 - Southview Junior High School - 4725 Southview Lane 1. Jane Moran, Chair 5429 Wooddale Ave. (24) 2. Myra Hykes 4516 Woodland Rd. (24) 3. Kathleen Bradford 4600 Concord Terr. (24): 4. Jeanne Mueller 4510 Golf Terr. (24) 5. Barbara Raap 4814 Golf Terr. (24) 6. Monna,Reding 5705 Woodland La. (24) 7. Lee Strang •. 16 Woodland Rd. (24) 8. LuJean Swenson 4620 Woodland Rd. W. (24) 9. Mary Webber 5201 Kellogg Ave. (24) 10. Barbara Andrews 4512 Drexel Ave. (24) PRECINCT 9 - Concord School - 5900 Concord Ave. I. Aileen Konhauser, Chair 6313 Halifax Ave. (24) 2. Jacqueline Lindskoog 6112 Kellogg Ave. (24) 3. Colleen Crew 6215 Halifax Ave. (24) 4.. Helen Connell 4713 School Rd. (24) 5. Marilyn Halker 6140 Concord Av.e (24) 6. Patricia Monson 6000 Ashcroft Ave. (24) 7. Mary Diehl 4704 W. 62nd St. (24) 8. Gertrude Nulsen 4808 W. 62nd St. (24) 9. Carolyn Setterberg 6039 Kellogg Ave. (24) 10. Florence Boughton 5921 Fairfax Ave. (24) PRECINCT:10 - Creek Valley School - 6401 Gleason Road I. Barbara Erlandson, Chair 6501 Nordic Dr. (35) 2. Mary Shoquist 6713 Cheyenne Tr. (35) 3. Shirley Byrne 6717 Gleason Rd. (35) 4. JoAnn Lonergan 5713 W. 68th St. (35) 5. Kathryn Rivers 6720 Rosemary Lane (35) 6. Jeanine Westling 6620 Pawnee Road (35) 7. Marilyn Devereaux 6704 West Trail (35) 8. Ruth Haggerty- 6804 Sally Lane (35) 9. Marguerite Ratelle 6716 Arrowhead Pass (35) 10. Ilona Kerin 6620 Gleason Rd. (35) 929 -9362 929 -8387 929 -5486 929 -2521 920 -7181 929 -9520 929 -6573 929 -2392 926 -7005 929 -4296 935 -0972 929 -7067 929 -1074 929 -9497 929 -5414 929 -4300 929 -2729 929 -9217 922 -0227 922 -3401 920 -0558 929 -7595 929 -3279 920 -6315 920 -2852 925 -3877 925 -3807 929 -4115 922 -6976 922 -4530 927 -9401 920 -6599 925 -1629 920 -2959 920 -2973 922 -1465 927 -6126 920 -7479 929 -9018 920 -0454 941 -4011 941 -6187 941 -5926 944 -7228 941 -8085 941 -8511 944 -6910 941 -2731 941 -3956 944 -1972 Proposed General Election Judges November 8, 1988 Page Three PRECINCT 11 - Creek valley Church - 6400 Tracy Ave 1. Geneva Smith, Chair 2. Sharon Lee Smith 6344 Rolf Ave. (35) 941 -2471 - -- 3., Alice Burnell 6708 Hillside Lane (35) 941 -3673 4. Gina Sherman 5416 Creek View Lane 35 ( ) 941 -5922 5. Carol Melichar! 5200 Tifton Dr. (35) 941 -4328 6. Delphine Duff 6417 Wilryan Ave. (35) 941 -4674 7. Karen Vickman 6716 Cahill Rd. (35) 944 -3938 8: Joy Perunovich 5201 Tifton Dr. (35) 941 -8576 9. Rosemary Sweeney 6805 Brook Dr. (35) 941 -2608 10. Betty Pollitt 6809 Hillside La. 944 -1310 6412 Limerick La. (35) 941 -1073 PRECINCT 12 - Christ Church - 6901 Nor mandale Rd. 1. Ardis Wexler, Chair 2. Shirley Bjerkin 4913 Larkspur La. (35) 925 -2097 3. Carol Hite Ellsworth 4405 Ellsworth Dr. (35) . ( 922-0406 4.. Mary Scholz 4720 La. ) 927 -4885 5. Doris Marchuk 4512 Gilford Dr. (35) 920 -2152 6. JoAnne Chayer 4600 Gilford Dr. (35) 922 -4360 7. Marjorie Erstad 4812 Wilford Way (35) 922 -2015 8. Lois Denker 4401 Dunberry La. (35) 929 -2527 9. Wynn Meeker 4501 Gilford Dr. (35) 925 -2790 10... Jan Burnett 4800. Wilford Way (35) 922 -5679 4516 Gilford Dr. (35) 920 -6069 PRECINCT 13 - Cornelia School - 7000 Cornelia Dr. 1. Doris Peterson, Chair 2. Amy Woods 4120 Parklawn.Ave. (35) 835 -7951 3. June Schmidt 7200 Cahill Rd. (35) 944 -8208 4. Irene O'Neill 7005 Bristol Blvd. (35) 922 -1183 5. Kathleen Garnatz 4350 Parklawn Ave. (35) 835 -4954 6. Margaret Polta 4120 Parklawn Ave. (35) 831 -1528 7. Elaine Tollefsrud 4480 Parklawn Ave. (35) 831 -7263 8. Pauline Mertes 7400 Ave. (35) 835 -7710 9.. Ann Matula Cornelia 7133 Cornelia Dr. (35) 920 -5898 10. Hattie Jackson 4145 Parklawn Ave. (35) 830 -1069 7333 Gallagher Dr. #329 (35) 835 -7483 PRECINCT 14 - St. Peters Church 1. - 5421 France Ave. S. Mary Jane Platt, Chair 2. Joyce Hanson 5504 Beard Ave. S. (10) 926 -8447 3. Donna Brastad 5829 Drew Ave. S. (10) 926 -8856 4. Maxine Hatzung 5701 Chowen Ave. S. (TO (1 ) 926 -3468 5. Anne Frances. 6301 Ewing Ave. S. (lo) 929 -3289 6. Lael Pederson 4909 B ywood West (36). 925 -4510 7. Esther Olson 5411 Abbott Ave. S. (10) 927 -5221 8, Louise Carlson 5441 York Ave. S. (10) 926 -1006 9. Mary 3700 Chowen Curve (10) 926 -6253 10. Geraldine dine Sj Sjo blom 5917 Drew Ave. S. (10) 922 -8579 5904 York Ave. S. (10) 922 -6185 PRECINCT 15 - Valle View Junior 1. Katherine Luikens, Chair Hi h School - 6750 Valley View Rd 2. Jean Hare 7310 Claredon Dr. (35) 944 -1016 3. Carol Hanson 6917 Mark Terrace Dr. (35) 944 -3877 4. .Jean Teasley 5809 Chapel Dr. (35) 944 -2759 5. Marjorie Johnson 7004 Tupa Dr. (35) 7115 941 -3984 6. Carolyn Klus Tupa Dr. (25) 7017 944 -5102 7. Maxine Wallin Valley View Rd. (15) 7022 941 -5195 8. Merry Krueger Tupa Cir. (35) 7306 Claredon 941 -4628 9. Elna Kassen 10. Dr. (35) 7607 Stonewood Ct. (35) 941 -6791 Bernie Schaeffler 7008 Mark Terrace Dr. 35 ( ) 941 -3667 942 -9703 Proposed General Election Judges November 8, 1988 Page Four PRECINCT 16 - Southdale Hennepin Library - 7001 York Ave. S -: 1. Mary McDonald, Chair 6929 Southdale Rd. (35) 926 -7860 2. Nathalie Person 4520 Laguna Dr. (35)' 922 -4547 3. Patricia Halvorson 6700 Xerxes Ave. S. (23) 869 -0366 4. 5. Bonnie Bjerken 6524 West Shore Dr. (35) 926 -6998 Bernadine Chapman 4860 W. 64th St. (35) 922 -1370 6. Donna Montgomery 6824 Oaklawn Ave. (35) 920 -9044 7. 8. Kathryn Larson. 6608 'Oaklawn Ave. (35) 925 -4476 9. Mary Zotalis 6455.York Ave. S. (35). 925 -9537 10. Caroline Scott 6809 Point Dr. (35) 927 -0627 Marlys Chase 6933 Southdale Rd. (35) 926 -8193 PRECINCT 17 - Yorktown Continental Apartments - 7151 York Ave. S. 1. Lorna Livingston, Chair 5920 Wooddale Ave. (24) 926 -5322 2. 3. Jean McDermid 5116 Mirror Lakes Dr. (36) 929 -8859 4. Marie Bachman :Louise 7201 York Ave. S. (35) 831 -6452 Jackson 6016 Zenith Ave. S. (10) 927 -8279" 5!_ Florence Tretten 5145 Bedford Ave. (36) 929 -8082 6.. 7. Mary Ryan 5508 Goya Lane (36) 926 -5139 8. Joyce Koets Yvonne Ford 5005 Clover Ridge (36) 929 -4070 9. Virginia McWethy 6308 Barrie Rd., 2D (35) 922 -6606 10. Katherine Saunders 6843 Langford Dr. (36) 6304 931 -0315 York Ave. S. (35) 925 -9750 PRECINCT 18 - Edinboro ugh Park - 7700 York Ave. S. I. 2. Jean Erdall, Chair 6101 Abbott Ave. S. (10) 922 -9202 Selma Shelton 7200 York Ave. S. (35) 831 -8863 3. Patricia MacCornack 5300 Malibu Dr. (36) 933 -0335 4. JOAnn Streed 7350 York Ave. S. (35) 835 -9019 5. Betty Lou Petersen 4313 Cornelia Cir. (35) 926 -9523 6. Doris Blake 6701 Southdale Rd. (35) 920 -1470 7. 8. Phyllis Fuller 5660 Woodcrest Dr. (24) 926 -2367 9. Myrtle Grette 5709 York Ave. S. (10) 926 -6373 10. Kathleen Tierney Audrey McCarthy 5016 Oxford Ave. (36) 929 -0948 6450 York Ave. S. (35) 929 -8126 PRECINCT 19 - Chapel Hills Church - 6512 Vernon Ave I. Charlotte Scanlon, Chair 6144 Arctic Way (36) 938 -3245 2. 3. Jean Altman Connie Bing 6151 Arctic Way (36) 935 -4803 4. Jeannene Wurst 6105 Lincoln Dr. (36) 938 -1069 5. Alyce Hamilton 6205 Knoll Dr. (36) 935 -9923 6.. Ardis,Dorsey 6913 Langford Dr. (36) 935 -1123 7. Erthel Johnson Johns 6624 Parkwood Rd. (36) 933 -2649 8. Luverne Graham 6650 Vernon Ave. (36) .935 -0656 9. Linda Anderson 6075 Lincoln Dr. (36) 935 -7515 10. Anne LaBovsky 5717 Camelback Dr. (36) 933 -1765 6075 Lincoln Dr. (36) 933 -1477 PRECINCT 20 - Wooddale Montessori School (formerly Cahill School) - 5601 W. 70th St. 1. Patricia Olander, Chair 7001 Lee Valley Circle (35) 944 -2185 2. Anita Delegard 7209 Lanham La. (35) 941 -5056 3. 4. Zelma" Gray Evelyn Herkal 5530 Village Dr. 135) 944 -5348 5. Harriet Koch 5501 Dewey Hill Rd. (35) 829 -1956 6. Sheila Luff 5501 Dewey Hill Rd. (35) 944 -0271 7. Mary Vanek 7150 Cahill Rd. (35) 941 -2367 8.' Kate Wyers 7520 Cahill Rd. (35) 941 -9353 9. Charlotte Burns 7250 Lewis.Ridge Pkwy.(35) 944 -3544 10. Lois Devitt 5820 Dewey Hill Rd. (35) 941 -4108 5601 Dewey Hill Rd. (35) 941 -3322 A. O e �° Cn v -by \�RPOMt�O/ 1888 ' REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS From: KENNETH ROSLAND CITY MANAGER Date: SEPTEMBER 12, 1988 Subject: 1988 IAFF CONTRACT SETTLEMENT PROPOSAL Recommendation: Agenda Item # VII. c Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action K Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Approval of the proposed settlement with IAFF 1275 - Contract 1988. Info /Background: The attached memorandum explains contract negotiations with IAFF 1275 (Firefighters). M E M 0 R A N D U M. TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: KENNETH ROSLAND SUBJECT: SETTLEMENT IAFF 1275 CONTRACT 1988 DATE: SEPTEMBER 12, 1988 For more than six months I have been involved in contract negotiations with IAFF 1275 (Firefighters). I am pleased to bring to you the following tentative agreement. 1. WAGES - 1988 Increase the wages of all employees by 4 %. Additionally, acid 1% to the wages of the employees performing paramedic and inspector duties. The additional 1% is a comparable worth adjustment consistent with the City's comparable worth program. Acting officer pay would become 20% of top firefighter base. In the past, the acting officer rate was based on Assistant Chief pay. After our reorganization and subsequent arbitration, this was no longer a viable means to calculate acting officer pay. 2. INSURANCE The City would increase the employer contribution $10.00/month. 3. SEVERANCE PAY Reduce the years of service necessary to qualify for full severance pay from twenty (20) years of service to fifteen (15) years of service. Because of the savings in wages paid to new employees, the City will not be increasing costs to the Fire Department by providing for an "early out ". Additionally, the City could also reduce its Worker's Compensation Liability by encouraging employees to leave City employment at a younger age. The cost of this proposed settlement is within the budget for 1988 and I recommend that you approve it. O e " tai VJ v � -bO • �N�bRPOMt�O • �BeB REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND - COUNCIL .; MEMBERS From: KENNETH ROSLAND Date: SEPTEMBER 12, 1988 Subject: SETTLEMENT FOR 1988 - 1989 WITH LOCAL 49 (PUBLIC WORKS) Recommendation: Agenda Item # VII . D Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Approval of the proposed settlement for 1988 -89 with Local 49 (Public Works) Info /Background: See memorandum attached. M E M O R A N D U M TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: KENNETH ROSLAND SUBJECT: SETTLEMENT FOR 1988 - 1989 WITH LOCAL 49 (PUBLIC WORKS) DATE: SEPTEMBER 12, 1988 As you know,' the City of Edina is a participant in The Joint Bargaining between MAMA and Local 49 of the Operating Engineers who represent our Public Works and Park Maintenance. Employees. The 1988 -1989 MAMA -Local 49 Joint Bargaining Agreement provided for reopened negotiations on the issues of wage rates and insurance for 1988 and 1989. After months of negotiations and - mediation, the MAMA and Local 49 bargaining committees reached a tentative agreement. The Agreement with the use of lower base wage and lump sum payments is, in the opinion of the MAMA negotiating committee, consistent with MAMA's efforts to comply with the State's 1984 Comparable Worth Law. The cost of the settlement for 1988 is within the 1988 budget. The Union has.ratified the Agreement. The Agreement is as follows: 1. WAGE RATES FOR 1988 All jobs, except the rate(s) for the job classification of Maintenance 1, listed in each City's wage appendix should be raised by 1 1 /2% effective the first payroll period of 1988, and all employees should be paid a lump sum payment for all hours the employees would be normally scheduled to work (excluding all overtime hours) equal to 2 % -2 1/.2% of the employees base pay rate. I am recommending the lump sum payment of 2 112% to be consistent with the 4% increases the City has budgeted for its other employees. 2. WAGE RATES FOR 1989 The base rate for all classifications should be raised by 1 1/2% effective the first payroll period in January, 1989, and all employees should be paid a lump sum payment for all hours the employees would be normally scheduled to work (excluding overtime) equal to 2% - 2 1/2% of the employees base rate. I am recommending that if you approve a 4% for all employees for 1989, we would pay a 2 1/2% lump -stun payment to be ,consistent with that 4% increase. 3. INSURANCE The City will pay $185.00 toward Health and Life Insurance benefits for the calendar years 1988 -1989. By mutual agreement, employees may use $15.00 of the per -month per employee of health insurance dollars for dental insurance for-all-unit employees. Again, I reiterate, the cost of this agreement is within budget and I recommend we accept this settlement. o e7, ';, REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Date: SEPTEMBER 9, 1988 Subject: PETITION FOR SIDEWALK Recommendation: Agenda Item # VIII.A Consent [] Information Only 7 Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑] To Council Action 7 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance That the petition for. construction of sidewalk on west side of Xerxes Avenue between 60th and 62nd. Streets be referred to the Engineering Department for processing.per normal procedure. Info /Background: The attached petition was received on August 16, 1988 from residents between 60th and 62nd Streets on the west side of Xerxes Avenue requesting that a concrete sidewalk be constructed in front of the homes from house number 6000 to house number 6132. PETITION TO THE CITY OF EDINA The residents between 60th street and 62nd street on the west side of Xerxes Avenue petition the City of Edina to construct a concrete sidewalk in front of the homes from house number 6000 to house number Many of us have resided here for over 30 years. During this time, we endured repairing our lawns each spring from the damage done by the salt and sand used on Xerxes Ave. which is a county road and a snow emergency route. The amount of salt used in recent years makes the growing.of grass along the curb an impossibility. The resulting unsightly weeds reduces property values considerably. Furthermore, there are 2 bus stops in this two block section and nowhere for people to alight when snowbanks are deep. Also, many people use the west side of Xerxes for walking which creates a safety problem in the winter. City Engineer Fran Hoffman informed us that Edina has State gasoline tax funds available for this sidewalk project on Xerxes, which is a county road. Therefore, the residents petition to have this sidewalk constructed by the City of Edina at no cost to the residents. We want the sidewalk to begin at the curb. A strip of grass between the curb and the sidewalk would leave us with the same old salt problem. FJ 6032 ELnie L. Benjamin �'� /i, 6104 F3_ nitmnn - .;.. /0 17-Y--- - ,pl— //— &-7 (7, VEX- 511 �/ S' e 6108 ARAMMEAMwd 1CG� U�z�a' JV 'i�� ' �� ,:u���. �� ,,; b /r, / - IF A .y l Okk -P. �WO,60& Q t �r O`,4 A j, . o e J REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KEN ROSLAND,- MANAGER MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Date: SEPTEMBER 9, 1988 Subject: PETITION FOR RESTORATION OF STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM Recommendation: Agenda Item # V7TT.B Consent Information Only Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance That the petition for restoration of storm drainage system in the area of 64th and York Avenue be referred to the Engineering Department for review and recommendation. Info /Background: The-attached petition was received on August'12, 1988 from Chateau Edina Association, 6415 York Avenue So. signed by 74 home owners in the area of 64th and York requesting restoration of the storm drainage system and. reapportioning of drainage water out from a three block area in Richfield. Chateau Edina Edina Association -" 6415 York Avenue S. Edina, MN 55435 August 12, 1988 Mr. Fran Hoffman Director of Public Works & Engineering City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Hoffman: We have seventy -four (74) signatures of home owners in our area at 64th and York who have signed the enclosed petition relative to the need of restoration of our storm drainage system. The apartment complex at 6455 York contains 44 units. These people are supportive of the petition. However, as renters.they are not property owners and therefore cannot sign this petition. The condo owners-at 6400 York have not suffered the serious damage the rest of us have, but they are giving community support in our effort to.have the problems rectified. In the past fourteen years we have had three major floods here at 64th & york. One flood was 8/76, next 9/77 and of course 7/87. In 1977, approximately 9 -10 cars were lost at 6415 York. In July, 1987, in addition to loss of a car in the garage and two cars in the parking lot, we also lost all of our party room furniture, . two washing machines, two driers, water softener; we had severe damage to our furnace and to our pool, and a considerable amount of personal property loss from our lockers. 25 to 30 cars were totaled in the garages at 6455 York. At least five homes in the 6300 and 6400 block on Xerxes suffered extensive damage also, . including cars, boats and personal property in the lower level of their homes. We hope this petition assists the City of Edina on focusing promptly on our critical problems in this area. Our property damage has been extensive, and the resell value of our condos and homes has been badly devalued. We strongly urge you to place the 64th and York area on the top of.your priority list for prompt planning and prompt action to correct this serious problem. Yours truly, r Franc4s J. Link 6415 York Avenue S. Edina, MN 55435 t-91, the umm-sipwi, are petitionisw the city or ndinap relative to the ron-stor-aZion of the storm draiwWo system at 64th and York* i"'As -zrouldl, It arpewm-v necosaltate the reapportioning of dr&JUave water -a thr*vg block area in Tdchfl"Idt whieb r-Twently, am. pties Into c'u —r; fr-il-n—a a tom. Z; � c�y �p I e a t a j nere"iin; the vise of the prop rv%rvin- c�'Ah and York. The restitution of this stem dral mmre lit aritio*1 for those of us livin--7, 4,n this area* 6zze,p same Address �t�LAt-)6e � bin s .......... AWAS zoo 2/ 1' -P We, the undersigned, are petitioning the City of Edina, relative to the restoration of the stony drainage system at 64th and York. This would, it appears, necessitate the reapportioning of drainage water out--from a three block area in Richfield, which presently empties into our drainage system. Secondly, it would indicate increasing the size of the punp serving 64th and York. The restitution of this storm drainage is critical for those of us living in this area. Name Address 4 C V� � `l��prk Al 13 l:' /j I .% 1,70s -,via rZd9r-.d9n(,d., -MM Patitl r, the -tr of Sellm lative to the anin C4 restoratlan of the storm drainne 3"tM at 64th and York. Thiz--vmadj, It appeazz,v, aacmstdUte the rmpportienlM of drainw,* vaUr out Pmm a thm-e block area in f.-iCbMaId# witdch r-resently empties Into our drainage systm, Secomayg It would ladUate Irare"IM the size of VA pmp earving 64th and Tork. Tho nntltution of this atom drainag e ,a is critical fbd- of os IlViM in this al'ea* ZIA � 0 Ogmva 0001, 11017K/A_97 0 CIL . r We, the undersigned, are petitioning the City of 5dina relative to the restoration of the storm drainage system at 64th and York. This-would, it appears,, necessitate the reapportioning of drainage 'water out from a three block area in Lichfield, which presently empties into our drainage system. Secondly, it would indicate increasing the size or" the pump serving 64th and York. The restitution of this storm drainage is critical for those of us living in this area. Name Address 1 A. o� e >4 En •'N�RPOM���/ �aee REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Francis Hoffman City Engineer Date: 8 September, 1988 Subject: Minnesota Drive Utilities: Water Main 365 Storm Sewer 186 Sanitary Sewer 379 Authorize Project & Bids Recommendation: Agenda Item # Ix. A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA E To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Approve projects for utilities in Minnesota Drive from France Avenue to Edinborough Way. Authorize bids for above projects. Info /Background: These projects are part of the Hedberg project. The estimated cost for the three utility projects is $139,547.02. They are proposed to be assessed against Phase I development of the Hedberg project. The total Phase I square footage is 2,452,428 square feet. The estimated cost per square foot would be 5.69 cents. (See estimates of cost.) ESTIMATE OF COST CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. P -WM -365 LOCATION: Minnesota Drive from France Ave to Edinborough Way HEARING DATE: Sevtember 12, 1988 ESTIMATED COST OF CONSTRUCTION: $ 45.291.68 (Includes Engineering, Clerical &Interest) UNIT QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION PRICE TOTAL 1,245 LF 10" D..I.P. W.M. Cl. 54 18.00 22,410.00 40 LF 6" D.I.P. W.M. Cl. 52 14.00 560.00 3 EA 10" 1/32 Bends 160.00 480.00 2 EA 10 ". 1/16 Bends 160.00 320.00 2' EA 10x6 Tees 220.00 440.00 2 EA 10x10 Tees 270.00 540.00 1 EA 10x10 Cross 350.00. 350.00 4 EA 10" Plugs 50.00 200.00 6 EA 10" Gate Valves and Manholes 1,500.00 9,000.00 2 EA Std. Fire Hydrants with 6" „Gate 1,300.00 2,600.00 Valve Box & Cover 2 EA 10” Sleeves 100.00 200.00 Subtotal: $37,100.00 Add.10% Engineering, 2% Clerical: 4,452.00 $41,552.00 Capitalized Interest 9%: 3.739.68 Estimated Total Cost of Construction: $45,291.68 Prepared By Checked By Francis J. Hof an, P . Director of Public Works and City Engineer ESTIMATE OF COST CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. P- STS -186 - LOCATION: Minnesota. Drive from France -Ave to Edinborough Way HEARING DATE: September 12, 1988 ESTIMATED COST OF CONSTRUCTION: $ 70.874.76 (Includes Engineering, Clerical & Interest) UNIT _QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION PRICE TOTAL 1 EA Remove Manhole 200.00 200.00 2 EA Remove Catch Basins 150.00 300.00 48 LF 44" Span L..R.B. R.C.P. 0 -8' Depth 330.00 15,840.00 Cl. III 20 LF 44" Span R.C.P. 0 -8' Depth Cl. III 110.00 2,200.00 (With Plug) 324 LF 12" R.C.P. Cl. V 0 -8' Depth 14.00 4,536.00 305 LF 15" R.C.P. Cl. III 0 -8' Depth 18.00 5,490.00 535 LF 18" R.C.P. Cl. III 0 -8' Depth 20.00 10,700.00 9 EA Std. CB's 0 -8' Depth with R3250A 1,000.00 9,000.00 Frame and Casting 1 EA Std. Manhole 0 -8' Depth with 1,000.00 1,000.00 R1728 Frame & Casting (No Holes) 2 EA 84" Dia. Manholes with Flat Slap 3,650.00 7,300.00 with R1728 Frame & Cover 0 -8' Depth 1 EA 15." Bulkhead 200.00 200.00 15 TONS Mn /DOT 2331 with Oil for Patching 50.00 750.00 54 TONS Cl. 2 Gravel 6" Thick Compacted 10.00 540.00 Subtotal: $58,056.00 Estimate of Cost Storm Sewer Improvement No. P- STS -186 Minnesota Drive from France Ave. to Edinborough Way Page Two Prepared By Checked By Add 10% Engineering, 2% Clerical: 6.966.72 $65,022.72 Capitalized Interest 9%: 5,852.04 Estimated Total Cost of Construction: $70,874.76 Francis J. Hoffman P.E. Director of Public-Works and City Engineer ESTIMATE OF COST CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. P- SS -37 -9 LOCATION: Minnesota Drive from France Ave to Edinborough Way HEARING DATE: September 12, 1988 ESTIMATED COST OF CONSTRUCTION: $ 23.380.58 (Includes Engineering, Clerical & Interest) Subtotal: $19,151.85 Add 10% Engineering, 2% Clerical: 2.298.22. $21,450.07 Capitalized Interest 9 %: 1.930.51 Estimated Total Cost of Construction: $23,380.58 Prepared By Checked By - Francis J. Hoff n, P' . Director of P lic Works and City Engineer UNIT QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION PRICE TOTAL 585 LF 8" V.C.P. 12 -14' Depth 14.00 $ 8,190.00 245 LF 8" V.C.P. 14 -161 Depth 16.00 3,920.00 150 LF 10" V.C.P. 12 -14' Depth 16.00 2,400.00 3 EA Std. 0 -8' Manholes (With Frame 1,000.00 3,000.00 - & Cover) 18.61 V/F Extra Wall Manhole 85.00 1,581.85 4 EA 8" V.C. Plugs 15.00 60.00 Subtotal: $19,151.85 Add 10% Engineering, 2% Clerical: 2.298.22. $21,450.07 Capitalized Interest 9 %: 1.930.51 Estimated Total Cost of Construction: $23,380.58 Prepared By Checked By - Francis J. Hoff n, P' . Director of P lic Works and City Engineer A. o e ��, ch REPORT /RECOMMENDATION 1888 To: Mayor & City Council From: Francis Hoffman � )� City Engineer .1 l Date: 8 September, 1988 Subject: 100% Petition to Install Grading, Gravelling, Water Main, Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer to Service Landmark Addition. Recommendation: Agenda Item # —IX. B. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA F] To Council Action ❑ Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Approve projects identified as Sanitary Sewer No. 377, Water Main No. 363, Grading and Gravelling No. BA -281, and Storm Sewer No. 185. These improve- ments will be on Malibu Drive to approximately 710 feet southeasterly from Lincoln Drive (see attached map and estimates). Info /Background: The Landmark Addition was approved earlier this year. The Developer's Agree- ment has the developer's petitioning the City to construct the sanitary sewer, water main, and grade and gravel Malibu Drive adjacent to the site. The project costs will be assessed back to the developer on a three year basis. Additionally, Van Valkenburg park is adjacent to the roadway, we would propose that the portion of the road costs that would be assessed the abutting parkland be over a ten year period. As such,.we would recommend approval of the projects with authorization that bids be taken. r.. KEY Portion of Malibu Drive to be Constructed 32 N88 049.53W r � • �,;; I 30666 -- 4'9f °S' : e - ;SS 67 T C r E CD Na 1z N V l 3 � Z W /11 !6 Q' S 59 v Cr r. S7143 Z_ _ .j'' ,4 W 03 213. l2 �. .r I o o N87 °51.16 •E o co Qj ,EAST �` j tB i v 4RVEV L�_ HL4 9� G� /_700 ZZ Al l' e � o G� � 1 � UO� , �•� � .mac a V - • £as,' 4!8 68 63 Z7 Q. o a •* 418 68 - 2 N89 °58 •W QP a1 a N w o\ v 2 1,Q W c w 445.02 -<III 94 lot s •1. —r 2 (59) q�`s✓ati� s' - � 'o,�, 2��`'�: :t` , -- !s5 7c ESTIMATE OF COST CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA GRADING. GRAVELING. CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER AND BITUMINOUS SURFACING - -- IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -281 LOCATION: Malibu Drive from Lincoln Drive to 655' Southeasterly HEARING DATE: September 12, 1988 ESTIMATED COST OF CONSTRUCTION: $29.217.87 (Includes Engineering, Clerical & Interest) NO. OF ASSESSABLE.FEET: 1.160.54 ESTIMATED COST PER LOT: $25.18 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: LOT BLOCK ADDITION PINS NO. FOOTAGE Outlot C Parkwood Knolls 20th 30- 117 -21 -32 -0008 605.37 Outlot E Parkwood Knolls 20th 30- 117 -21 -32 -0010 555.17 UNIT QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION PRICE TOTAL 2,000 CY Excavation V.M. $ 4.50 $ 9,000.00 1,886 TONS C15A Gravel 6.50 12,259.00 20 LF Remove Concrete Curb & Gutter 10.00 200.00 . 4 EA Clear, Grub & Remove Trees 150.00 600.00 4" & Larger 7 EA Adjust Manholes 100.00 700.00 10 EA Adjust Catch Basins 100.00 1,000.00 Subtotal: $ 23,759.00 Add 10% Engineering & 2% Clerical: 2.851.08 $ 26,610.08 Add 9.8% Capitalized Interest: 2.607.79 Estimated Total Cost of Construction: $ 29,217.87 Prepared By Checked By ancis J. Hof fm P Director of Pu is Works and City Engineer ESTIMATE OF COST CITY OF EDINA. MINNESOTA WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. P -WM -363 LOCATION: Malibu Drive from Lincoln Drive to 710' Southeasterly HEARING DATE: September 12. 1988 ESTIMATED COST OF CONSTRUCTION: $51.014.13 (Includes Engineering, Clerical & Interest) ESTIMATED ASSESSABLE COST OF CONSTRUCTION $28.868.62 NO. OF ASSESSABLE LOTS: 5 ESTIMATED COST PER ASSESSABLE LOT: $5.773.72 AMOUNT TO BE FINANCED BY UTILITY FUND FOR OVERSIZING MAIN: $22.145.51 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: LOT BLOCK ADDITION PINS NO.' NO. LOTS Outlot C Parkwood Knolls 20th 30- 117 -21 -32 -0008 5 UNIT QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION PRICE TOTAL 1 EA 16" Plug MJ 209.00 209.00 1 EA 16" Butterfly Valve with 4,600.00 4,600.00 Manhole MJ 20 LF 16" D.I.P. Water Main MJ 50.00 1,000.00 710 LF 12" D.I.P. Water Main Cl. 52 30.00 21,300.00 15 EA 6" D.I.P. Water Main Cl. 52 20.00 300.00 1 EA 12x12 Pressure Tap (with 3,200.00. 3,200.00 Manhole) 2 EA 12" 1/32 Bends 260.00 520.00 2 EA 12" 1/16 Bends 260.00 520.00 1 EA 12" Gate Valve with Manhole 2,130.00 2,130.00 1 EA 12x6 Tee 360.00 360:00 1 EA Std. Hydrant with 6" Gate 1,200.00 1,200.00 Valve Box & Cover 10 EA 1" Corporation Taps and Stops 50.00 500.00 10 EA 1" Curb Boxes and Stops 90.00 900.00 1 EA 12" Plug Tie MJ 92.00 92.00. 2 EA 12" Retainer Glands 96.00 192.00 40 LF 3/8" Tie Rod 2.00 80.00 Estimate of Cost Water Main Improvement No. P -WM -363 Malibu Drive from Lincoln Drive to 710' Southeasterly UNIT QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION PRICE TOTAL 280 LF 1 ".Copper for Services 12.00 3,360.00 1 EA 12x12 Tee with 16" Bell 1,020.00 1,020.00 Reducer Prepared By:� 'y �z. Checked By: Subtotal: $41,483.00 Add 10% Engineering & 2% Clerical: 4,977.96 $46,460.96 Add 9.8% Capitalized Interest: 4.553.17 Estimated Total Cost of Construction: $51,014.13 ancis J. Hoff n, P. . Director of Public Works & City Engineer ESTIMATE OF COST CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. P -SS -377 Location: Malibu Drive from Lincoln Drive to 710' Southeasterly Hearing Date: September 12, 1988 Estimated Total Cost of Construction: $35,663.65 .(Includes Engineering, Clerical & Interest) No. of Assessable Lots: 5 Estimated Cost Per Assessable Lot: $7,132.73 Assessment District: Lot Block Outlot C Addition Parkwood Knolls 20th Pins No. No. Lots 30- 117 -21 -32 -0008 5 Subtotal $29,000.50 Add 10% Engineering & 27 Clerical $ 3,480.06 $32,480.56 Add 9.87 Capitalized Interest $ 3,183.09 Estimated Total Cost of Construction $35,663.65 Prepared By Checked By Francis J. Ho man, Director of Public`Works and City Manager Unit Quantity Material Price Total 48 L/F 8" V.C.P. 8 -10' Depth 14.00 $ 672.00 532 L/F 8 ".V.C.P. 10 -12' Depth 16.00 8,512.00 127 L/F 8" V.C.P. 12-14' Depth.. 20.00 2,540.00 7 Each Std. 0 -8' Manholes (with frame and cover) 11000.00 7,000.00 20.9 L/F Extra Wall Manhole 85.00 1,776.50 4 Each 8x4 Wyes 50.00 200.00 300 L/F 4" C.1. Extra Strength for Services 12.00 3,600:00 6 Each Service Taps on Existing Line 200.00 1,200.00 140 S/Y 4" Bituminous Repiar Minn. D.O.T. 2341 with 1' C15A Base 25.00 3,500.00 Subtotal $29,000.50 Add 10% Engineering & 27 Clerical $ 3,480.06 $32,480.56 Add 9.87 Capitalized Interest $ 3,183.09 Estimated Total Cost of Construction $35,663.65 Prepared By Checked By Francis J. Ho man, Director of Public`Works and City Manager ESTIMATE OF COST CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT N0: P- STS -185 Location: Malibu Drive from Lincoln Drive to 290' Southeast Hearing Date: September 12, 1988 Estimated Total Cost of Construction: $17,733.75 (Includes Engineering, Clerical & Interest) No. of Assessable S /F: 140,300 Estimated Cost Per Assessable Foot:. $0.126 Assessment District: Lot Block, Addition Pins No. S/F Outlot E Parkwood Knolls 20th 30- 117 -21 -31 -0010 87,453 Tract A R.L.S..1503 30- 117 -21 -31 -0011 52,847. Prepared By Checked By �Y 0 Francis J. Hoffman, P./J�'i., Director of Public Works and City Engineer Unit Quantity Material Price Total 83.3 L/F 18" R.C.P. 0 -8' Depth 25.00 $ 2,082.50 107 L/F 15" R.C.P. 0 -8' Depth 20.00 2,140.00 190 L/F 12" R.C.P. 0 -8' Depth 19.00 3,610.00 23.3 L/F 12" R.C.P. Removed 10.00 233-.00 6 Each Type "C" Catch Basins 0 -6' Depth with Frame & Casting 950.00 5,700.00 2 F &1 Type "C" Frames & Covers 200.00 400.00 3 L/F Extra Depth Catch Basins 85.00 255.00 Subtotal $14,420.50 Add 10% Engineering& 2% Clerical $ 1;730.46 $16,150.96 Add.-9.8% Capitalized Interest $ 1,582.79 Estimated Total Cost of Construction $17,733.75 Prepared By Checked By �Y 0 Francis J. Hoffman, P./J�'i., Director of Public Works and City Engineer RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR SOUTH EDINA DEVELOPMENT ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "SOUTH EDINA DEVELOPMENT ADDITION ", platted by Kenneth M. Anderson, Personal Representative of the Estate of Fred W. Hedberg, deceased and unmarried, John W. Hedberg and Jean Hedberg, husband and wife, Michael T. DeCourcy, also known as Michael DeCourcy, and-Merry L. DeCourcy, husband and wife, Michael T. DeCourcy as attorney in fact for Donald DeCourcy and Catherine L. DeCourcy, also known as Catherine DeCourcy, husband and wife, Elizabeth T. DeCourcy, an unremarried widow, Cecilia Talbot, a single person, and Bertram Talbot, a single person, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of September 12, 1988, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. ADOPTED this 12th day of September, 1988. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted.by.the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of September 12, 1988 and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 3rd day of October, 1988. City Clerk ;w QIIIIIIIIII.:. ;AW Aft .j- .. IM 1 NOV! MMIAM701: LIMi f= �_ I ■ p■ --_ DBERG SITE . PAF I TI- FAMILY HOUS Am WAII1,.A:gAmC=Tj2[0l: 1 �M �1 �v_r7 ��i.•.w- 1111 ■■ Ilnl CLvv IJA vit J. 7 1 4m A m 0.7t. a Lm ■ = I :1.18HI mr .11P . ma, , lj=A AM 1111111 1111111 n I im :f `.ANI ak f _ �i.if. -l.i• r • f I im :f I._ ' 1M V s; . ■ �j 11 M 11 1 EN OL In 1111 Im -M 1 _ -2 31 7� -■ ■Iii ■!� ' � ` ■�.,■■N ■■■f� urxm 4 ;_ 11■■11 171 1��,1 I1 ■ ■II wit �� � ■ ■11 Ir�ll Ir•11 11 ■/t �Il ■■ ■L... � !�� I�AI 1/1x1 I�. � �g . ■■■ ■ Li1W■ ■111 111 ■ ■`uYY ■■■1 a..: ■M ■M■EiM■■ niyi e. -si ■ ■E■ ■M ■1 _ _ ■ \ ■� ■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■a ■ ■1 Lm MOVIE SEE R9 II ■■■MMES■■■ ■■■■■■EI ♦ linii ONE Ell •■■■el C ♦ ■■IIMI :,:,A$,= 0-1,0 �klv :::, a _ � --- ,__ r. . ... •. - � � 'c_ ,- �'i i _: , ' z �... i j '_J __Y.1 i V i r —� i : ". W. An ME WEIRP ONE IM ONE 94 mil ,mom mm mm Itl 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK_-N0. -DATE --- - AMOUNT — - VENDOR 250.00 ! ,256M85 08/22/88 29.53 MN. WANNER e56M85 06/e3/88 16.00 MN. WANNER I : - - - -- --- . --- - - - - - -- -43_53 • CHECK REGISTER 09 -12 -88 PAGE 26 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE _. -- SERVICES - - -' REPAIR PARTS e56M91 09 /Oe /6S e33.10 MODERN EQUIPMENT CONTRACTED REPAIRS 233.10 + I #** * ** 256M93 09/06/88 f0e.60 E36M93 09/06/88 199.50 ',256M93 09/06/68 102.60 256M93 09/06/88 291.66 — — - - -- — - 696736 x' ssss#s -: i 256M97 08/22/88 9,597.40 - - - - - -- - 9,597.40 MOTOROLA EQUIP MAINT MOTOROLA EQUIP MAINT MOTOROLA EQUIP MAINT MOTOROLA EQUIP MAINT MPLS FINANCE DEPT. WATER x 13 10 -4201- 643 -64 070232 ' 10- 4540- 560 -56 070e11 e e c f *# -CK3 40- 4e48- 801 -80 004541 6819 - -- - ----------- - - - -.� h I, 10-4274- 4eO -42 751909 10-4274- 420 -42 757301 10 -4274- 420 -42 739933 10 -4274- 420-42 739934 **w-CKS 1;2 x3 x4 ** *-CKS Ize za� 40- 4640 - 803 -80 I31 ] * * #* ** -., *00-CKS i3 35 "1256N01 09/02/68 661.50 MPLS GUN CLUB PRO SH TARGETS 131 E9- 4648- 7Ee -7E 22061 6771 661.50 * 130 !40 - - - -- --- - - - - -- - - - -- -- -- - -- - -- 4' I- e36NO3 06/70/60 1,590.00 MPLB SEWER 6 WATER CONTRACTED REPAIRS 40 -4e4S- 001 -80 e0664 6606 '4 -� -_ ---—----- 1,590.00 f --'- - - -- - - - - -- _— ..--- ' -- - -44 — --- -_ - - -- - -45 ae • *• * ** -------- - - - - -- - -- ** *-CKS 40 _ X49 256N13 08/26/88 40.23 MUZAK ADVERTISING OTHER 50-4214- 82E -82 50 '.256N13 08/26/88 40.23 MUZAK ADVERTISING OTHER 50- 4214 - 862 -86 el 80.46 • - -- - - - - -'53 *** —CKS e4 155 '5e Ie56Ne2 08/26/88 70.00 NAATL GUARDIAN 8YS. ALARM SERVICES 50- 4304 - Set -82 67701 5- .50 70.00 * 50 co * ** -CKS tea 164 i 256N31 08/22/88 71.55 NEBCO DISTRIBUTING — CON Ks "IN 399545097 I' 256N31 08 /2e /88 81.38 NEBCO DISTRIBUTING CONCESSIONS e6- 4624- 683 -68 44095 4505 rn 152.93 .,I •s * * ** ** *-CKS �256N73 oe /30/as 680.00 NEL— §OAS -ADfO —CORM —PART - �G26=560 =5b—i� ��03 n -3 ',256N33 08/30/88 369.00 NELSON RADIO COMM PARTS 10-4620- 560 -56 14925 6554 14 1988' CI F EDINA %J I \_ CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 5 . 2 - 'how CHECK RE ER 09-12-88 as 09/02/88 3,670.52 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10-4524-314-30 1575 2-1256M42 256M42 __- _______08/30/88_- ___,_____ - - --- 890.00 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10-45e4-380-30 001498 3. JE56M4e 08/30/88 555-3e MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 40-45e4-803-80 001498 'd eSGM4e oe/ee/se 361.09 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 40-4524-803-80 1349 15, 50.il s 7 •*• -CKS of eS6M58 09/06/88 187.1e MILLIPORE GENERAL SUPPLIES 48 64859 6111 1,3 187.12 - ------------------------ I'll-CK9 I TOOL CO. TOOLS 10-4580-301-30 zo 47.40 0**-CKS 12 23 24 L,56M68 08/26/88 196.37 MN. CELLULAR TEL. SUBSCRIPTION 10-4204-140-14 2.5 13 MN. CELLULAR TEL. EQUIP RENTAL 10-4226-420-42 2n 256.50 2390 vow-CKS 13 3 ,256M70 08/30/86 38.00 MN, CONWAY EQUIP MAINT 10-4274-4e0 -4E 119621 33 34 -1, 3. 0. 0 MN. CONWAY EQUIP MAINT 10-4e74-440-44 120193 35 .iE56M70 08/30/66 37.50 MN. CONWAY EQUIP MAINT 10-4e74-440-44 Ile-696-- 37 'Je56M?0 00/30/86 484.00 MN. CONWAY CLOTHING REPLACEMENT 10-4574-440-44 120306 138 2SGM70 _160.00- MN. CONWAY CREDIT 10-4901-440-44 120811 6180 13. ,e56M70 og/oe/se 1,410.00 MN. CONWAY EQUIP REPLACE 10-4901- 440 -44 1E 68T 16180 4 . 1,9ee.50 s 14.1 43 • * -p 4. v IF **"-CKS 256M76 08/e3/88 10E.54 MN. CLOVE GENERAL SUPPLY 40-4504-800-80 E3434 �45 4M 47' 40 102.54 142 •*O-CKS 256M80 08/22/88 87.02 MN. SUBURBAN NEWS ADVERTISING 10-4210-140-14 03 256M80 09/02/88 544.23 MN. SUBURBAN NEWS ADVERTISING 10-4210-140-14 154 IE56M80 08/26/88 252.82 MN. SUBURBAN NEWS ADVERTISING LEGAL 10-41'10-140-14 cr 97. a5 884.07 e56m81 256M81 oe/23/se 21.48 7- MN. TORO INC. ---REPAIR-- REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 7e1039 '50, !60 08/22/88 .-4- M N___.TO FCC)— INC PARTS Es:m:l /Ze/ea 67.08 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 27-4540-664-66 es. M I 00:/ae/as e9.47 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS E7-4540-664-66 I- 720747 721797 E56m81 os/ee/as TV. 3i___MN_.T0RCF_IN_C. EPA I R-P-AR 0;---6 64-m--A-6-Te 0 9 3 v o34 4 e56M81 09/02/88 372.98 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 27-4540-664-66 723255 6589 ee 256M81___08/22/88 93.71 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 27-4540-664-66 721875 e56m81 09/02/88 e8.09 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR 771.53 • 70 71 4 72 *• *-cgs 73 74 09/02/88 ESO.00 VALLEY WHOLESALE SERVICES e7-4e01-664-66 L 8367 75 Y 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 09 -12 -88 PAGE 24 CHECK NO. DATE - -- -- AMOUNT _ VENDOR - ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P.O. 0 MESSAGE f'i - - - -- - - 4,940.00 s — - -- ssssss sss - CKS 6399 256ME7 107.30 MAYO DIST. INVENTORY SO- 4630 - 842 -84 GENERAL SUPPLY 10-4504 - 560 -56 19720 — - -- - _ 08/30/88 256M16 08/26/88 _ 805.24 MCCAREN DESIGNS _ -PLANTINGS _&- TREES___-- -_.30- 4560- 782 - 78_15391. I 1 -; 32.85 » 805.24 08/23/68 437.25 MERIT ssssss PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 19742 256ME7 09/02/88 E56ME5 08/30/80 135.66 MED OXYGEN S EQUIP EQUIP MAINT 10-4ET4- 440 -44 130060 6337 256M25 09/02/88 . _ 41.90 _ _ -_ MED OXYGEN 6 EQUIP FIRST AID SUPPLY 10- 4510- 440 -44 350330 �._ 19789 177.56 • _09/02/88_ 08/30/88 -_ 436.00 - - -- - -- - I- I MISC 25- 4924= S26=SL57 -1 633 I256ME7 09/02/88 1,314.00 MERIT SUPPLY 6399 sss -CKS 7 e 9 io ,1 1? ;13 1• ;15 1e !n e Iv n _ X21 sss -CKS ze 25 26 2-7 _ zo ;b 130 131 32 ,3 3a 35 .--- _.— . —._ -- 36 3 38 311 no 41 i<7 da as 47 as lag sss -CKS 3C '31 '37 154 55 35 •� « =CKB 37 459 59 —__ 60 X61 Ie2 *o*-CKS 'cn sss -CKS 65 60 6, 256ME7 08/23/88 250.70 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLY 10-4504 - 560 -56 19720 256ME7 _- _ 08/30/88 _ - 84.15 - MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 -4 4504- 628 -62 19844 32.85 » 256ME7 08/23/68 437.25 MERIT SUPPLY PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 19742 256ME7 09/02/88 3,640.00 MERIT SUPPLY MISC 25- 4924 - 520 -52 19790 6337 E56M2T METRO WASTE CONTROL 149.50 MERIT_ SUPPLY MISC 25- 4924 - 520 -52 19789 256M2T i _09/02/88_ 08/30/88 -_ 436.00 MERIT SUPPLY MISC 25- 4924= S26=SL57 -1 633 I256ME7 09/02/88 1,314.00 MERIT SUPPLY MISC 25- 4924 - 520 -52 19853 6772 %-7 256ME7 08/EE/88 48.00 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLY 27- 4504- 663 -66 19721 6452 I7IE56ME7 08/30/88 214.70 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 28 -4S12- 702 -70 19805 6573 ES6M27 08/22/88 497.75 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 19788 10-4524- 314 -30 001498 E36ME7 09/02/88 470.40 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504- 782 -78 19855 E56M27 08/26/68 334.31 MERIT SUPPLY - - - -- GENERAL SUPPLIES - 30= -4504= 782 =75 -19622 256ME7 09/06/88 484.30 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 762 -78 19897 6656 256ME7 09/06/88 459.50 MERIT SUPPLT GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504- 782 -78 19893 ,256ME7 09/06/88 491.10 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES - -- 30 =4504= 782 -78- 19898 -_ --6118 256M27 08/26/88 2,270.00 MERIT SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540- 801 -80 19761 6294 sss -CKS 7 e 9 io ,1 1? ;13 1• ;15 1e !n e Iv n _ X21 sss -CKS ze 25 26 2-7 _ zo ;b 130 131 32 ,3 3a 35 .--- _.— . —._ -- 36 3 38 311 no 41 i<7 da as 47 as lag sss -CKS 3C '31 '37 154 55 35 •� « =CKB 37 459 59 —__ 60 X61 Ie2 *o*-CKS 'cn sss -CKS 65 60 6, 11,581.66 # - !256M31 08/23/88 32.85 METRO FONE COMM. GENERAL SUPPLY — A0= 4504= 801 =80- 279031 i 32.85 » so n'256M35 A8 /22188 191,729.94 METRO WASTE CONTROL SEWER SERVICE 40- 4312 - 812 -80 5789 - ----- - - - - -1 91 , 729 .94 s ESGM39 09/02/88 32.00 MID CENTRAL INC. CLOTHING REPLACE 10 -4574- 440 -44 3009 32.00 • I ssssss I256M42 09�02�68 MZDWE$T A$PN}GLT COR-- 1,776.17 BCACKTB 10-45E4--301--30-1575— "!256M42 08/30/88 3,697.04 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10-4524- 314 -30 001498 sss -CKS 7 e 9 io ,1 1? ;13 1• ;15 1e !n e Iv n _ X21 sss -CKS ze 25 26 2-7 _ zo ;b 130 131 32 ,3 3a 35 .--- _.— . —._ -- 36 3 38 311 no 41 i<7 da as 47 as lag sss -CKS 3C '31 '37 154 55 35 •� « =CKB 37 459 59 —__ 60 X61 Ie2 *o*-CKS 'cn sss -CKS 65 60 6, 1988 Cl' EDINA CHECK RE ER \ +N 09_12 -88 _ 23 CHECK N0. T - - - - - - DATE -- — -- AMOUNT - VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. A PO A . . . MESSAGE � ssssrs I, - - -- - -- -- -- - - - - - -- - -- - - - - - -- - — -- - - - - - -- - -- -- _ ***-Cgs 256L36 OB /30/88 100.00 LEFFLER PRINTING PRINTING 30- 4600 - 781 -78 3244 6 - _ -- - _1.00 _00 ie ho �I ***-C KB 256L46 "!256L46 08/30/88 60.00 LIEN INFECTION CON SERVICES 10 -4201- 630 -62 0 01628 -- L- z 08/22/88 62.00 LIEN INFECTION CON SERVICES 27-4201-663-66 161063 +4 ----------------- - - -- 1_22- .00__r e. - - ii �'e� rrrrsr -CKS to 7! 08/22/88 6.50 6.50 . -------------- - -- --- LIHHOFF GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 100 -10 137654 - :20 i 6.50 * 121 122 l- 123 sss =CKS =� 256L60 2 5 61 6 8 —06,o 08/23/88 2,562.43 _ a 3o, e e 4-i 2 49 . 4e -- LOGIS — L e G i s ---- - - - DATA PROCESSING - -- -- - -- -- - - - - -- - 10 -4233- 160 -16 - -- 26 7v Szm e 10 -'9-2$ i256L60__08/23/88 1,783.24 L_OGIS '1� DATA PROCESSING 10 -4233- 200 -20 256L60 256L60 08/23/58 08/23/88 3,490.42 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 10-4233- 420 -42 '3J 256L60_ 08/23/88- 903.56 LOGI3 DATA PROCESSING 40-4233- 800 -80 � 'I G96L60 08/G3/88 -- - - - -- 240.,_49 LOG I3 DATA PROCESSING - 50-_4233- 820 -82 " 36 256L60 08/23/88 240.49 LOGIS - DATA PROCE88I PROCESSING - -50- 4233 - 840 -84 - -' -- 37 240.47 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 50-4233- 860 -86 3 4 461.10 r � lJG � do u d 256L62 c„� °�1256L62 08/26/88 08/30/88 60.00 LOLA EDMON _ _ PROF —8 E-R ii _IC a 27- 4201 - 662 -16 0813 -- �z 43 W 4d 1- 80.00 LOLA EDMON SERVICES 27- 4201 - 662 -18 0811 5753 a3 46 la7 - - -- - _ 1 60 .00 • C.; "`� rsrrs• < ssr-CKS : "I256L80 08/22/88 38.17 LYNDALE GARDEN CTR GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 644 -64 2797 6564 51 �? � 38.17 • 03 154 .,i -- — --- ' rrrrsr - - - lee ee� iis=CK, 256M02 256MO2 08/26/88 08/26/88 27@.69 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. -MAC - - REPAIR PARTS -- 10- 4540 - 560 -56 86477 6431 159 - 256M02 08/26/88 E84.78- QUEEN` EQUIP INC.. REPAIR -PARTS 0= 4540 = 560 =5b -86223 I —161 =° @v.a" 290.61 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 86612 6508 e 278.52 r 64 rrr —CKS ae 2B6M12 tl 08/22/88 198.64 MATHISON CO. _ _ COST OF COMMODITIES - 23 -4624613 -61 90475 az� en 198.64 60 7 (I 256M1� m1" 256M13 09/02/88 09/08/88 1,430.00 3,510.00 _ _ MATT BULLOCK CONBT, RIP RAP 10 -8548- 358 -30 6299 2 e7 MATT BULLOCK CONST SAND GRAVEL 6 ROCK 27 -4522- 664 -66 6299 7O ----- "_ - - -- ..— - - 77 V 7 i" 1988 CITY OF EDINA \ CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 895.00 "'e56K45 08Je6/88 87.00 I' I256K42 08/22/88 5, 084.11 . ;e56K42 08 /2e /88 5,312.22 e56K4E oe/E3/68 5,130.68 Fi 10- 4504 - 322 -30 15,227.21 + " ssssss * * * *•. :r . ,.. 99434-74- es6K45 oe/e6 /88 895.00 "'e56K45 08Je6/88 87.00 e56K45 - — 06/e6/88 - •..• . _. - - -- 55.60 _ ,I 1 , 037.60 • sus -DRS 33 CHECK REGISTER 09 -12 -88 PAGE ee VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE KOCH MATERIALS CO__._ _ ROAD OIL KOCH MATERIALS CO ROAD OIL KOCH MATERIALS CO ROAD OIL KOKOSH ATHLETIC GENERAL SUPPLIES KOK08H ATHLETIC GENERAL SUPPLIES -- - KOK08H ATHLETIC - _ GENERAL SUPPLIES Ii ;Ie56K63 09/06/88 86.26 KUSTOM ELECTRONICS RADAR - - - - - - -- -- — -- — - 86. 6 ! -- -- -- - �= * * ** ** 256LO6 =1 e56L06 08/30/88 ___ __._ _._ 240.00 _ LAKE_ RESTORATION ____._SERVICES_ 08/30/88 480.00 LAKE RESTORATION SERVICES 480.00 -s- 720.00 z 3 v 10 -45e6- 314 -30 711347 4913 10- 4526 - 314 -30 709809 10 -4526- 314 -30 815389 v s ** -CKS a I I 10- 4504 - 681 -6e 15430 6709 '13 10-4504- 6E1 -6E 15579 14 ', e 10- 4504- 6e1 -6e 15622 ,e 10- 4901 - 420 -42 10- 4201- 358 -30 _ 3671 10- 4201 - 358 -30 3686 -- In le itv ss* -CKS za z1 Izz 23 124 zs *** -CKS 5 n za 3 7 f * ** -CKS 171 72 "1 * * * *•. :r . ,.. 99434-74- ne .� n... man nn , nvw stT�rw EDIUIP 8ERVICEB ]0- 4E01- 3B0 -30 sus -DRS 33 421.56 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 322 -30 993704 256L28 08/22/88 3s 37 ss *s*s PRODUCTS _ GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 560 -56 993703 _ 256L28 08/22/88 144.17 9**-CKS 30 e56L10 oe /e3/86 30.50 LAKELAND ENGINEERING REPAIR PARTS 40-4540- 81e -80 L83414 PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLY I - 30.50 es 09/02788 _e3e.51 107.79 LAW80N PRODUCTS TOOLS— TOOL9 10-4580- 440 =44 - 999370bZi260 e56L28 08/30/88 558.51 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 40 -4540- 803 -80 99370e 63e4 * ** -CKS �z qe e56Lee 09 /0e /88 179.60 LANDSCAPE 8 TURF GENERAL SUPPLY e7 =4504- 664 =66 7372 668e Jv 08 /ee /88 250.00 LANDSCAPE 6 TURF FERTILIZER 27-4558- 664 -66 3336 6309 COFITR7�CTED�EPi�I718�0�248= j0'e56L2e 256L2e_ 08/30/88 ee1.75 LANDSCAPE 6 TURF SOD 6 BLACK DIRT 27 -456e- 664 -66 3364 71 256L22 08/30/88 450.00 LANDSCAPE 6 TURF SOD 6 BLACK DIRT 27- 4562- 664 -66 3360 :53 1 , 101 .35 s 7e I„ 7 f * ** -CKS 171 72 "1 ` I "' e56LeB ,08/2e/88 421.56 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 322 -30 993704 256L28 08/22/88 122.35 LAWSON PRODUCTS _ GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 560 -56 993703 _ 256L28 08/22/88 144.17 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLY 10-4504- 646 -64 993146' e56LE8 08 /ee /88 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 646 -64 993705 es 09/02788 _e3e.51 107.79 LAW80N PRODUCTS TOOLS— TOOL9 10-4580- 440 =44 - 999370bZi260 e56L28 08/30/88 558.51 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 40 -4540- 803 -80 99370e 63e4 - -- -- - - -- -1,586.89 =' 256L30 COFITR7�CTED�EPi�I718�0�248= 867= 83- Tb-1- bs —bT4T- 0902/88 250.OGZ�GYNE FTINNE�3�Ti�CO— F 250.00 s 7 f * ** -CKS 171 72 "1 \ \ v� n` v v 11 1988 -CI1 EDINA CHECK RE. _R 09 -te -88 ei C►IFCK NA_ nATF ANMINT VFunno TTCw nuaroToT *nu ArrnuuT un tuu a o n r uecoAee I '2 256J31 08/22/88 142.66 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 644 -64 I ' 31 256J31 08/29/.88 71.54 JERRYS_ HARDWARE SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 646 -64 4I956J31 08 /ee /88 17.89 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10-4504- 660 -66 e56J31 08/22/88 54.57 JERRYS HARDWARE CLEANING SUPPLIES 10 -451e- 440 -44 ° °__256131 08/22/88 11.49 JERRYS HARDWARE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 7 7rESGJ31 Oe /22 / /8e 16.58 JERRYS HARDWARE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 9 ° e56J31 08 /2e /88 19.56 JERRYS HARDWARE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 1O 9 256J31__ - 0.8 /22 /8BL02.0T JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES eT- 4504- 662 -66 ;_ 0 956131 08 /ee /88 35.46 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 27-4504- 664 -66 +3 1 256J31 OB /e2 /8B 19.86 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES e9- 4504- 7e2 -7e 14 25GJ3.1 08(22/88 66_59 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 la 3 25GJ31 08 /ee /ee 31.55 JERRYS HARDWARE REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 +7 899.58 t +a 19 Its e •lift• � 111 -CKS 0 2+ 22 11.256J35 09/02/88 - 1,12e.77 JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING 10- 4600- 180 -18 e133 6728 23 zs 19I 11122.77 l 27 2oi 26 2f, llM�ll ll* -CKS za 2z 23 256J74 08/:3/88 66.15 JUBTUS LUMBER GENERAL SUPPLY 10 -4504- 646 -64 433eO 6300 24 e56J74 08/E3/88 43.7: JUBTUS LUMBER TOOLS 10 -4580- 301 -30 40620 6035 �+ e36JT4 09/06188 186.18 JUSTUB LUMBER PAINT 30- 4544 - Tee -TB 49571 6773 �3 obi e96.05 35' 3 20 *lltll 29 * ** -CKS 30 _e6_6K09 08 /e6 /Be 1_0.49 KAMAN BEARINB 6 SPLY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 646606 40' 31 e56K09 08 /ee /88 149.58 KAMAN BEARING 6 SPLY REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 6455ee .i 32 160.00 t 42 33 43 44 34 llllll 35 *00-CKS 4s 3G_[256K35 08/e2/_88 27.00 KNOX LUMBER CO. GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 644 -64 626589 650e 46 d7 3' e56K35 09/06/88 21.91 KNOX LUMBER CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 646 -64 629947 6694 4 3"IeSGK35 06 /ee /8B 10.e5 KNOX LUMBER CO. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 330 -30 6e6eB6 6471 'O :10 39 e56K35 08 /ee /8B 11e.86 KNOX LUMBER CO. REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 540 -54 696789 6356 40 256K33 oe/ee /ee 133.38 KNOX LUMBER CO. REPAIR PARTS 10-4540 - 540 -54 696980 6370 53 41 Z56K35 08 /Ze /98 151.17 KNOX LUMBER CO. REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 540 -54 64e466 6495 54 42 Z_36K33 oe /ee/ee 49.67 KNOX LUMBER CO. TOOLS 10-4580- 301 -30 641362 6504 56 43 e56K35 00/at/se 995.60 KROX LUMBER CO. LUMBER 0�3i3= 6{3><3Z9Q 57 I44 e56K35 08/30/88 41.03 KNOX LUMBER CO. LUMBER 10- 4604 - 646 -64 641383 6611 58 I'45 e56K35 08/30/88 29.95 KNOX LUMBER CO. LUMBER 10 -4604- 646 -64 630016 s9+ 60 61 a6 8S6K35 08/29/88 IeT.79 KNOX LUI'fBE*-C MBE - bQ4<= 6-4-6= �bE8T -6 {4 47 e56K35 08/22/88 46.48 KNOX LUMBER CO. LUMBER 10 -4604- 646 -64 6e7015 6473 62 48 e56K35 08/30/88 e4.99 KNOX LUMBER CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES 27- 4504- 664 -66 641468 6577 63, 64 49 e56K35 09/06/88 . 3 �A63�CU A - - -Q - 6121 6 6 so e56K35 08/30/88 50.64 KNOX LUMBER CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES 28-4504- 70e -70 6e6857 66 67, 51 e56K35 09/06/88 48.79 KNOX LUMBER CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES ee- 4504- 702 -70 630202 6657 - .___ _ sz e56K35 _. _-- __ 08/26/88 37.98 KNOX LUMBER CO. -GENERAL-SUP _ =504= 867= S�b�f3 feu 68 53 256K35 08/22/88 29.75 KNOT( LUMBER CO. GENERAL SUPPLY 40-4504 - 801 -80 626685 6372 1. 64 256K35 08 /ee /B8 94.7e KNOX LUMBER CO. GENERAL SUPPLY 40 -4504- 801 -80 626672 6440 , 2 '8 1,394.49 t 36 '7 ssllll ttt -CKS 1779 74 78 I V , 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK N0. DATE ( ssssss `- eB6I18 _ - 0!/06/88 n'. f' ssssss 256Iee 08/23/88 I'^ •fffff e56I53 08/30/88 i I' I' 256161 CHECK REGISTER - — AMOUNT--------- - VENDOR _ ITEM DESCRIPTION 1,492.35 s e, 814.00 ICBI _ - _ SERVICE CONTRACTS 2,814.00 » e94.08 INDUST & TRUCK PARTS REPAIR PARTS 294.08 • 40.00 INTL CON BLDG OFFCLS BOOKS 40.00 f 08/30/_89 _ _ 400 . 9e __ __ __— INTERSTATE _ 400.92 ; - — - I- P-56I74 06/26/88 68.95 I08 1 �''_ - - - - - 88.95 f -- - - - - -- CONTRACTED REPAIRS OFFICE SUPPLIES 09 -12 -88 PAGE 20 ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. M MESSAGE is 13 — -- -- - -- -- » » »- CKS - -- e I� 10 -4288- 510 -51 21979 e 0 I" as» -CKS 3 10- 4540 - 560 -56 52448 6475 '4 ate he fsf -CKS I1° 10 -450e- 490 -49 - --- - - - -- - -- 12t 2 *rf-CK8 .2 z 10 -4e4e- 560_56 115547 27- 4516- 661 -66 K07546 s# »-CKS ; fff -CKS at Paz - *w +-CKS .e et 73 !e. i57 ea fff -CKS '�° c: —_ Pn i e56J14 OB /e6 /98 168.75 JACOBSON SUPPLY CHEMICALS 30- 4S64- 793 -78 OGG 168.75 s I' e56Je7 08/30/88 S.50 JERRYS FOODS MEETING EXPENSE 10 -4e06- 440 -44 256JeT 08/e6/88 _ 135.16 JERRYS FOODS GENERAL SUPPLIEB 10� ER 09 -12 -88 19 1988•CI1 EDINA ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. 0 CHECK RE • — ( �. 256H33 CHECK NO. DATE _ AMOUNT_ VENDOR 38925 6477 10- 4286 - 220 -22 I] • �12�256H09 08/30/88 1,641.25 HALLMAN iw _ 1,836.37 • -- -- -- is ° GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 646 -64 171028 6492 - - -- - ---- - - - - - -- -- ----- 08/30/88 - - - - -- --- - - - - -- 9.56 HARMON CLASS — !256H21 aJI"1256H21 06/30/88 32.98 HARMON CLASS 42.54 �. - -- - -- -- - - - -- .d, ES6Hee 08/e3/88 42.71 HAYDEN- MURPHY 4/ 42.71 • 10- 4540 - 560 -56 18025 6439 388.00 17 - -- - -- - - - --- -- - - -- -- 10- 4286- ee0 -e2 -- - - - - 17186 - ,e I19 \ ER 09 -12 -88 19 _ ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. 0 MESSAGE • — ( �. 256H33 08/30/88 !2 LUBRICANTS 10 -4618- 560 -56 38925 6477 10- 4286 - 220 -22 I] • Ys 3* _eS6H33_____- _09/06/88 - - 64._50 _ HENN CTY SHERIFF * «« -CKS is ° GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 646 -64 171028 6492 ;1\ i GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 646 -64 171020 6484 �9 33 .d, —;u * ** -CKS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 18025 6439 388.00 17 - -- - -- - - - --- -- - - -- -- 10- 4286- ee0 -e2 -- - - - - 17186 - ,e I19 \ -- ------------ - - - - -» » » -CKS - --- 1 2 1 • zz 23 \ I" e56H32 -_ 08/30/88 _ — ----18.00 HEDGES -DIANA GENERAL_ SUPPLIES 23- 4504- 611 -61 Iz4 i_ 256H32 08/30/88 25.00 HEDGES -DIANA CRAFT SUPPLIES 23-4588 - 6111 -61 25 a,l 256H32 08/30/88 100.91 HEDGES -DIANA CRAFT SUPPLIES 23- 4588 - 611 -61 =G L - - - - -- — ( �. 256H33 08/30/88 499.65 HENN CTY SHERIFF ROOM d BOARD 10- 4286 - 220 -22 Ys 3* _eS6H33_____- _09/06/88 - - 64._50 _ HENN CTY SHERIFF GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 420 -42 ;1\ i 564.15 * 33 .d, 134 e56H34 08/30/88 388.00 - HENN COUNTY TREAS. ROOM 6 BOARD 10- 4286- ee0 -e2 -- - - - - 17186 - - - - - -- I... 388. 00 • 37 �„ •% I3o • ** * ** - -- -- - ---- - - - - -- -- -- -- — * ** -CKS I4 e56HS6 08 /ee /88 151.90 HIRSHFIELDS GENERAL SUPPLY 30- 4504 - 782 -78 333872 6e85 14i d2 43, 256H56 08/22/88___ __________ -_- 28_.76.- __- HIRSHF_iELDB GENER_A_L SUPPLY 30- 4504 - 78_333871 6285 I"�256HSG 08/30/88 44.15 HIRSHFIELDS PAINT _782_- 30 -4S44- 782 -78 353604 6e85 a5 '�'i 224.81 • q6 -- - -- - - - - -- - 147 �' I • * « * «* *00-CKS q9 � "; • eSGH63 08/22/88__ HOFFERS FIELD MARKINGS 10- 642 -64 65071 6423 3; _ _ e56H63 _ 08/30/88 - _________174.50___- 174.50 _-- _INC HOPPERS INC FIELD MARKING _4_563- 10-4563- 642 -64 65286 6604 - 53 +NI'' 349.00 • ed - -- - -- lea • * * * * «• r* *SRS 56 ie0 - `e66HT4 09 /06 /BB- HOOTEN CLEANERS LAUNDRY 10- 4e6e- 4e0 -4e e9�8 _ _ .. - - -- - -- -11.66 11.66 - * - -- - -- — - -- -- GI G2 _ -- +•• -CKS Ia,, rl`'!256H85 08/26/88 275.00 HUMPHREY RADIATOR CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 6556 G5 IG�S - -- - -- - - -- - - - - - - -2 75 ._0 0 — - - - -- 4d I.q � e56I1e 08 0fee /8e e14.00 IBM CORPORATION e56I12 08/22/88 1,278.3S IBM CORPORATION SERVICE CONTRACTS 10 -4eee- 510 -51 SERVICE CONTRACTS 10-4288- 510 -51 * ** -CKS I -1 J 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK_N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 50.00 • s » »sss E66G57 oe/eb/ae 09 -12 -88 PAGE 18 ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. A MESSAGE I• - -- --- 26 - - - - -- 12-. 00 , e 7 GOPHER OIL CO. GENERAL BUPPLIEe 10- 4501- 560 -56 347999 6500 38.00 • GRAYBAR -- CO. e56G59 09/06/88 637.60 -- - - - - -- - -- - -- - -- — — - - -- - -- - -- -- -- - - - 10 Il 1 » »» - C K S GOPHERS SHOOTERS AMMUNITION 10- 457e- 420 -42 03e857 6711 3 4 le CO. REPAIR e56G6e 08 /ee /e8 t00.s0 GRAYBAR ' 256661! 09/06/88 110.00 117 J4 256662 08/22/88 — - -- - 111.00 » »s -CK5 Ie ID GRANDMA 8 CUPBOARD - 321.50 _ s 3439 20 ;21 GRANDMA S CUPBOARD CONCESSIONS ' 256G68 09/02/88 54.62 S CUPBOARD CONCESSIONS 256668 09/02/88 'L3 74 256668 69/02/88 132.55 e56G68 08/22/88 207.17 - - -- - - - -- -- ------ 635.08 - ' e56G76 Oe /30/96 tE6.93 256G76 08/30/88 168.45 295 2B + 09 -12 -88 PAGE 18 ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. A MESSAGE GREEN ACREH BPRNKIR. 9ERVI699 10 =4801= 643 =6� GREEN ACRES SPRNKLR. SERVICES 10 -4201- 643 -64 256688 09%36%88 200.00 GRU0-itR 8 -P0uEl - EBUIP- EOUIP- REPLWCEMENT ------0= 4901 = 650 =64 762 6 200.00 s II I• - -- --- 26 - - - - -- -- 207.34 s , e 7 GOPHER OIL CO. GENERAL BUPPLIEe 10- 4501- 560 -56 347999 6500 38.00 • GRAYBAR -- CO. REPAIR PARTS e 9 -- - - - - -- - -- - -- - -- — — - - -- - -- - -- -- -- - - - 10 Il 1 » »» - C K S GOPHERS SHOOTERS AMMUNITION 10- 457e- 420 -42 03e857 6711 3 4 le CO. REPAIR PARTS 10= 4540= 5 -40 =54- 651 -7i 6668 33 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. REPAIR PARTS 117 J4 » »s -CK5 Ie ID GRANDMA 8 CUPBOARD CONCESSIONS - eT- 4624- 66e -66 3439 20 ;21 GRANDMA S CUPBOARD CONCESSIONS 27 -4624- 663 -66 3753 2= GRANDMA — S CUPBOARD CONCESSIONS 27 -4624- 663 -66 — -_ 3e 'L3 74 GREEN ACREH BPRNKIR. 9ERVI699 10 =4801= 643 =6� GREEN ACRES SPRNKLR. SERVICES 10 -4201- 643 -64 256688 09%36%88 200.00 GRU0-itR 8 -P0uEl - EBUIP- EOUIP- REPLWCEMENT ------0= 4901 = 650 =64 762 6 200.00 s II I• - -- --- 26 - - - - -- -- 207.34 s , 1 I256G96 -_CKS 27 L 38.00 • GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4S40- SeO -S2 648147 6607 Ir GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. REPAIR PARTS 10-4540 - 520 -52 649173 6625 ;' GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. REPAIR PARTS 10= 4540= 5 -40 =54- 651 -7i 6668 33 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540- 801 -80 637740 J4 »+» -CKS 3e GREEN ACREH BPRNKIR. 9ERVI699 10 =4801= 643 =6� GREEN ACRES SPRNKLR. SERVICES 10 -4201- 643 -64 256688 09%36%88 200.00 GRU0-itR 8 -P0uEl - EBUIP- EOUIP- REPLWCEMENT ------0= 4901 = 650 =64 762 6 200.00 s II I• - -- --- - - - - -- -- 207.34 s , 1 I256G96 09/02/88 38.00 L 38.00 • - sssss• e56H04 -- 94.08 + 1' 7I 256H09 08/30/88 195.1e GUSTAVE LARSON CO. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 646 -64 560810 GUY SPEARKER CO HACH CO HALLMAN REPAIR PARTS 40 -4540- 801 -80 29964 6626 GENERAL SUPPLIES - - ----10 =4504= 482 -48 367768 6720 LUBRICANTS 10 -4618- 560 -56 38964- 6477 II I45 •1• —CKB 46 147 �1 e4 e5 ] 7 7e +»» -CKS 'o IG I a2 I63 G4 ss »-CKS "" 67 1988'Cl1 EDINA CHECK REk -:R 09-12-8e 17 CHECK ­­NO.­DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. • MESSAGE i I I 230.00 s**-CKS �r.256E78 ___ --og/oe/ae--- --- 197.14 EMRICH BAKING CO. CONCESSIONS 27-46e4-663-66 3747 7 eS6E7S ; 08/22/88 124.9e EMRICH BAKING CO. CONCESSIONS 97-46e4-663-66 ll-Desfivrs 08/30/88 e09.e6 EMRICH BAKING CO. CONCESSIONS e7-46e4-663-66 esGE:pe 800-30088 eeg eG EMR10im BAKING 60. GQNGESS;qms pr�g:?@ -08 —o"as °c °9 e6 EMRICH BAKING eG. eGNeESSIONS e9 4fie4 663 66 531.3e 256FOe-- 1- -.08/23/88 125. 00 -----,-.FAC IL ITY -SYSTEMS______,___ MISC 25-4924-5EO-SE 29933 les.00 * * 0 - ***-CKS 7 19 21 22 bl 256F08 09/02/88 4e.00 FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL FIST AID SUPPLY 10-45I0 -440-44 286783 27 • ***-CKS 30 31 • E56G24 08/30/88 69.30 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10-4248-440-44 93753 212 33 Oe 26Ge4 OS/23/88 O 82.80 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS RADIO SERVICE 10 -4E94- 560 -56 93838 13d 135% e: 6Ge4 P- OS/3/86 450.0 0 G COMMUNICATIONS RADIO SERVICE 10- 4E94 - 560 -56 9E809 E56Ge4 08/23/88 67.30 SEN. COMMUNICATIONS RADIO SERVICE 4e94-560-56 _ 93901 Aw 256GE4 08/e3/88 69.30 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS RADIO SERVICE 10-4e94-560-56 93837 137 E!56Ge4__ _015/P-3/88 138.40 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS RADIO SERVICE 10-4e94-560 -56 93476 !4 256G24 09/oe/8e 51.14 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS RADIO SERVICE 10-4294-560-56 93967 6037 141 928.e4 • 42 43% 14 a+* -CKS j45 7' 256G26--- 09/06/88 93.ee GENERAL OFFICE PROD GENERAL SUPPLY 10-4504-4e0 -4e 061490 140 ------ JESGGes 99 "" 09/06/88 93.ee 66.95 6EMSRAt 01'FIGE PROD GENERAL OFFICE PROD GENERA - SUPPL -W GENERAL SUPPLIES .0= 4694- 4E0 -48 10-4504-420-4e 113450 e969e6 9 9,, 9 Go 8 8 GENERAI GF�IGE PMT7777=7:!�EN�!AL SUPPLY io-4"4 4ec 4e i i :-r 4s a 152 160.17 5 3 60 ' , 1:4 57 256G32 08/22/68 54.04 GENUINE PARTS CO. REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 79342 m36G3e 08/e6/88 40.29 GENUINE PARTS CO. REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540-560-56 079243 256G3i 0S/L'?-/S16 69.18 GENUINE PARTS CO. --------REPAIR PARTS 1 7 j 163.51 63 • 157 2S604e MEBARD_GUNS_ _______AMMUNITION e9-497e-72e-7E 53848 6456 rsl 129.94 Aw 7 7 0 oo*-Cxs �rl;" e56944 06/30/86 50.00 GLEN SIPE PAINO SERV CONTRACTED REPAIRS 30-4248-78e-78 890825 7 4 Mmw7ml I TIP 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 09 -t2 -88 PACE 16 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. • MESSAGE z J 256D43 08 /L2 /88 27,000..00 __ _.__._DELANO ERICKSON ARCH __CONSTRUCTI,ON.- 28= 1300_000- 00- 3______ —!4 I 981.00 i .I rrrrrr 256E20 68/26/88 85.00 ECOLAB PEST" ELIM - SERV- CONTRACT -E6 '80= 4288 = 781 =78 -- 81673 ii 85.00 i I -_ °°Eoc'a7 ^ °� : ^� °° __ 4r ^ °° °}+ enruA FOUNDATION MiSC 10- 3600 -AOA 0A 25bc37 A8+�38•°° 1- ,v9 - --- -- EnIuw FOUNDATION -- - - MI86 - - - -- - -- - 36 -38vv j4'I256E37 08/30/88 1,098.88 EDINA FOUNDATION MISC 30 -3800- 000 -00 � • - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- 1.098.88 • I. e56E39 /30/88 43.75 EDINA LIQUOR STORE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 520 -52 I 08 43.75 i 256E4t 08/30/88 33.27 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS PRINTING 28- 4600 - 701 -70 - -- 33.27 i - - - - - - - - -- I 1 trl'^ 256E75 09/02/88 230.00 EMPLOYEES CLUB SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 500 -50 iii -CKS 12C 27 Izo 3, - 13 000-CKS 14, rrr -CKS q= 42 Iqq 14e jen '- 000-CKS d9 3.� S1 72 173 74 I3c " »» »-CKS Isc ao ez e3 f4 n. ,67 en ---- ._ - -_- __. •e9 I'0 i3t -CKS !7721 J.1 I G 27,000.00 • I_ - -- ,256D79 - -. _ - —' - -- 08/22/88 -- -- - --- - --- 6,2733.19 ' e 17 Ii :n °° 256DT9 08/22/88 6,791.79 DORSEY d WHITNEY SERVICES LEGAL -51 ° �°.oaD47 256D47. �°' 08/22/88 8�-- r�DE°CrENDA$66 COURIER __ DEPENDABLE COURIER POSTAGE -POSTAGE-.- 1A- {89A- 510 114811' -60 26.49 09/02/88 483.00 E. H. RENNER 6 SONS CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 646 -64 10209 6644 n 3 08/30/88 498.00 E. H. RENNER 6 SONS CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10 -4248- 646 -64 10208 I, 4 iiis » »------ - - - - -- - - - -- - -- - - -- ---- - - - - -- - -- - » »s -CKS 7 I,e 1 256D65 08/30/88 726.35 DIXIE PETRO-CHEM INC CHEMICALS 26- 4564 - 682 -68 303785 4706 I1e 256D65 08/30/88 315.00 DIXIE PETRO -CHEM INC CHEMICALS - 303651 4706 256D65 08/22/88 2,775.49 DIXIE PETRO -CHEM INC CHEMICALS 40 -4622- 805 -80 299004 _Ig zi E56063 09/02/88 2,489.08 DIXIE PETRO-CHEM INC CHEMICALS 40-46EE- 805 -80 303602 �2' " 6,305.92 :a I 981.00 i .I rrrrrr 256E20 68/26/88 85.00 ECOLAB PEST" ELIM - SERV- CONTRACT -E6 '80= 4288 = 781 =78 -- 81673 ii 85.00 i I -_ °°Eoc'a7 ^ °� : ^� °° __ 4r ^ °° °}+ enruA FOUNDATION MiSC 10- 3600 -AOA 0A 25bc37 A8+�38•°° 1- ,v9 - --- -- EnIuw FOUNDATION -- - - MI86 - - - -- - -- - 36 -38vv j4'I256E37 08/30/88 1,098.88 EDINA FOUNDATION MISC 30 -3800- 000 -00 � • - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- 1.098.88 • I. e56E39 /30/88 43.75 EDINA LIQUOR STORE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 520 -52 I 08 43.75 i 256E4t 08/30/88 33.27 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS PRINTING 28- 4600 - 701 -70 - -- 33.27 i - - - - - - - - -- I 1 trl'^ 256E75 09/02/88 230.00 EMPLOYEES CLUB SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 500 -50 iii -CKS 12C 27 Izo 3, - 13 000-CKS 14, rrr -CKS q= 42 Iqq 14e jen '- 000-CKS d9 3.� S1 72 173 74 I3c " »» »-CKS Isc ao ez e3 f4 n. ,67 en ---- ._ - -_- __. •e9 I'0 i3t -CKS !7721 J.1 I G I_ - -- ,256D79 - -. _ - —' - -- 08/22/88 -- -- - --- - --- 6,2733.19 --- - - -- -------- DORSEY d WHITNEY ---- --- -- -__._...__.. -- SERVICES LEGAL ------ -- ------- - - --- -- - -' t0- 4218 - 220 -22 256DT9 08/22/88 6,791.79 DORSEY d WHITNEY SERVICES LEGAL 10- 4218 - 220 -22 13,064.98 » - -- 256E-05 09/02/88 483.00 E. H. RENNER 6 SONS CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 646 -64 10209 6644 236EOS 08/30/88 498.00 E. H. RENNER 6 SONS CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10 -4248- 646 -64 10208 I 981.00 i .I rrrrrr 256E20 68/26/88 85.00 ECOLAB PEST" ELIM - SERV- CONTRACT -E6 '80= 4288 = 781 =78 -- 81673 ii 85.00 i I -_ °°Eoc'a7 ^ °� : ^� °° __ 4r ^ °° °}+ enruA FOUNDATION MiSC 10- 3600 -AOA 0A 25bc37 A8+�38•°° 1- ,v9 - --- -- EnIuw FOUNDATION -- - - MI86 - - - -- - -- - 36 -38vv j4'I256E37 08/30/88 1,098.88 EDINA FOUNDATION MISC 30 -3800- 000 -00 � • - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- 1.098.88 • I. e56E39 /30/88 43.75 EDINA LIQUOR STORE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 520 -52 I 08 43.75 i 256E4t 08/30/88 33.27 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS PRINTING 28- 4600 - 701 -70 - -- 33.27 i - - - - - - - - -- I 1 trl'^ 256E75 09/02/88 230.00 EMPLOYEES CLUB SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 500 -50 iii -CKS 12C 27 Izo 3, - 13 000-CKS 14, rrr -CKS q= 42 Iqq 14e jen '- 000-CKS d9 3.� S1 72 173 74 I3c " »» »-CKS Isc ao ez e3 f4 n. ,67 en ---- ._ - -_- __. •e9 I'0 i3t -CKS !7721 J.1 I G Y 4/ 1988 -Cl • • EDINA C CHECK RE E ER 0 09 -12 -88 15 + CHECK NO. D DATE A AMOUNT V VENDOR I ITEM DESCRIPTION A ACCOUNT NO. INV. 9 9 P.O. • MESSAGE z = _ 108,70 C CRESCENT ELECTRIC_ R REPAIR PARTS 1 10- 4540_- 39_0 -30 0 039170 6 6539_ ' , 4I256C7S 0 09/02/88 3 318.62 C CRESCENT ELECTRIC R REPAIR PARTS 1 _ _ 4 6617 ° ° 427.32 * * ° ° 0 ] e IE56C79 0 09/06/86 9 9.35 C CRICKET PHOTO G GENERAL SUPPLIES 1 10- 4504 - 200 -20 4 49894 0 0 °I 9 9.35 r r ' '° 01 rrrrrr r r ** -CKS 1 13 „ 1 193.42 I S SUPPLY 14 `t_ 256C87 0 08/22/88 1 34_04 C CURTIN MATHESON I GENERAL S 10--4504-482-48 1 10 ,e 13,256C87 0 08 /22 /SS 5 51.36 C CURTIN MATHESON SCI G GENERAL SUPPLY 1 10- 4504- 482 -48 1 17 +11�256C87 0 08/22/88 2 224.59 C CURTIN MATHESON SCI G GENERAL SUPPLY 1 10- 4504- 482 -48 1 1° "—_ • • 503.41 1 1° 121 856658 081�231�88 193.48 GURTi6 1090 GENERA6— SUPP6Y 10=45 4 8e 48— 1 B 2 256C8B 0 08/22/85 1 1,461.50 C CURTIS 1000 P PAPER SUPPLIES 1 10- 4514 - 510 -51 3 362401 6 6199 1 124 " - - - - - - - - 1 16 1,461.50 I 20' 2 I25 2' ��srrr * * ** —CKS 2 2] u 08/26/88 8 84.75 D D. C. HEY CO. C CONTRACTED REPAIRS 2 23- 4248- 61E -61 0 071804 2a1256007 0 08/26/88 2 25.00 D D. C. HEY CO. S SERV CONTRACT EO 3 30- 4288 - 781 -78 0 072832 3 3' `5i - 109.75 r r 3 3- r , 100.00 + 7c ^ e56C75 - 09/06/88 -- 36.00 COURTNEY WAYNE C MILEAGE 10 -4e08- 100 -10 36.00 v -, __ —_. * ** -CKS ;e 1968 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 09 -12 -88 PAGE 14 f ' CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. A MESSAGE 75.00 + 2 -- - -- -- --- - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - -- .e al * + + +++ * ** -CK3 256C33 _ 08 /30 /88 - _ -- 158.73 CITY OF EDINA WATER 10 -4258- 446 -44 le e 256C33 08/30/88 43.29 _ CITY OF EDINA — WATER 10- 425A- 6�6 -6� — e56C33 08/30/88 41.76 CITY OF EDINA WATER 10- 4258 - 646 -64 I10 .243.78 +- - - -- - - - -- !,: "ie56C34 06 /ee /88 47.68 CITY OF RICHFIELD POWER 10-4e5e- 345 -30 " ' - — - -- 47.68_* - a ++ + + ++ *** -CKS I,7 18 9 e56C37 i 09/06/88 13.09 CLANCY DRUG INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- e00 -20 n 7 256C37 09/06/88 19.39 CLANCY DRUG INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 260 -26 122 256C37 - ___09/06/88 i' - - -- - -- - _ - 60.25 CLANCY DRUG INC. — GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 In 92.73 * + * * *+ * ** -CKS 27 a 256C39 06/30/88 102.50 CLEAN -FLO LAB SERVICES 10- 4e4e- 358 -30 4600 s' - - -- ----- - - - - -- -- 102. -5.0 * 3; I * + * + *+ woo-CKS -33 35 e56C44 oe /ee /ee 605.79 COCA COLA BOTTLING CONCEe6IONe e6 -4Ee4- ee3- ee - - - -- - - - - - -- ]5 - -',7 I'JE36C44 08 /e2 /ee 483.50 COCA COLA BOTTLING CONCESSIONS 27-4624- 663 -66 38 4,9 • * * * *+ ** *-CKS cz 256C46 09/06/88 - - - - -- - 529.73 - -COLOR TILE - - - - - -- Misc - - - - -- -- 25-4924- 520 -52 - 975463. 6776 592.x- 529.73 4` * * * * ** ** *-CKS av e56C51 _ 08/22/88 - _ e32.39 —COMM OF_REVENUE - - -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- GASOLINE---- 10- 461E - 560 -56 -i 232.39 f -- - - -- -- - - - -he ! l„ * ** -CKS • 256C55 08/23/88 161.te COMPONENT TECH REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 4e333 6437 'e0 - - - - - - _161 _ 12 _ ----- - - - - -- —---- -- - - -- - -- -' - -- -- - - - -- -- -- 79 99 * ** -CKS eI �e2 03 - - -- - - lea 256C57 08 /26T88 100.00 CONCLECO SERV _ _ �LUAW -1 G S1)"M S I 0-4S i2' 5- 20= 5$-767 -M-4 ES 100.00 + 7c ^ e56C75 - 09/06/88 -- 36.00 COURTNEY WAYNE C MILEAGE 10 -4e08- 100 -10 36.00 v -, __ —_. * ** -CKS ;e Lis 1256C25 _08/22/88 83.30 " 256025 08/2P/88 - 102.00 185.30 » i �� ssssss 44 E56CE7- 00/30/86 19881CI EDINA 389.00 CHECK RE eR 09 -12 -88 _ 13 �I CHECK -- NO_ DATE AMOUNT -- VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE • I 256879 08/23/88 200.00 BROCK WHITE GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 802 -80 247165 2 .. 436.00 .s - - a • yI e56880 0e/ee/ee 140.00 BROWNING FERRIS SERVICES 10 -4201- 508 -50 • .256880 -- _08/22/88 140.00__ BRO_WNIN_C_FERRIS__ SERVICES 10- 4201 -5 508 -50 7:e56B80 OB /2e /88 204.00 BROWNING FERRI8 SERVICES 10- 4201 - 508 -50 ,*'1 256880 08/22/88 55.23 BROWNING FERRIS CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10 -4248- 646 -64 ° • 256880 - 08/22/88 _ .- . _ 340.00 .__ -- ___BROWNING FERRIS _ CONTRACTED _REPAIRS 10 -4E48- 646 -64 ;2 ' E56B80 09/02/88 90.98 BROWNING FERRIS - ---- - RUBBISH REMOVAL - - - -- - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- 10-4250-628-62 _ 230656 _ _ u -r" E56B80 08/2P/88 50.00 BROWNING FERRIS RUBBISH REMOVAL 27 -4250- 662 -66 " - - -- - -- -- - -- 1 , 0 2 0.21 (w' » » » » »» »»» -CKS 17 256B91 08/30/88 131.18 BURY b CARLSON INC. BLACKTOP- 10 -4524- 301 -30 30567 z, V17 256B91 08/30/88 52.47 BURY & CARLSON INC. BLACKTOP 27-4524- 664 -66 30567 'z 183.65 • 21 24 f 2 256893 09/02/88 30.00 BUS RECORDS CORP. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 180 -18 607538 6594 tfr' 256B93 08/22/88 37.50 BUS RECORDS CORP. GENERAL SUPPLY 10 -4504- 180 -18 607247 I" 256893_ -__- 08/22/88 - 56.81- _BUS RECORDS CORP. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 180 -18 607273 1;�'{I1 256B93 08/26/88 550.00 BUS RECORDS CORP. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 -4 4504= 160 -18 607372 ial 1r 256893 09/06/88 184.35 BUS RECORDS CORP. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 180 -18 607613 6594 '3' i 256B93 _ 09/02/88 110.00 BUS_RECORDS CORP. PRINTING 10- 4600- 180 -18 607538 6594 256893 08/22/88 325.00 BUS RECORDS CORP. VOTING MACHINES 25- 4944- 180 -18 607273 3-7 !y 1,293.66 s ap 39, •• * »ss - •• * -CK§ (y 142 431 -' 256896 09/06/88 494.08 BUSINESSLAND INC. SERVICE CONTRACTS 10-4288- 510 -51 12119 6775 494.08 » - - - -- - - - -- - - - -- - -- - ., , ssssss � - - - - - -- - - -- - -- - s s s -CKS nl , .I 256C04 08/22/88 76.00 CAMPBELL SPORTS - t11r SAFETY EQUIPMENT 26- 4642 - 661 -68 9493 c - -- - - - -- 76.00 » ,ZIS tY "� ssssss sss -CKS :46 °I 256008 08/22/88 904.19 CARLSON LK ST EQUIP. REPAIR PARTS Ar 904.19 » I I,- sod * *w -CKS - - -- 6l Lis 1256C25 _08/22/88 83.30 " 256025 08/2P/88 - 102.00 185.30 » i �� ssssss 44 E56CE7- 00/30/86 389.00 - 389.00 40, r CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO CHEMLAWN ADVERTISING CONTRACTED REPAIR 10 -4210- 140 -14 87356 1n_eatn_ten_te t��§e� 10- 4248- 643 -64 vow-CKS n9 170 1 72 Eg6Ce8_______ -..09. /02/88_,T5�00 CHEMSE_ARCH - GENERAL SUPPLY 10 -4504- 646 -64 81251 lip' T Rp low, 74 1988 CITY OF EDINA C CMFCI[ ND. RATE AMOUNT q1 CHECK REGISTER 09 -12 -88 PAGE 12 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. S MESSAGE : 1 0 z e !1 !4 :s !6 17 to !e PC 11 -- 13 s- 16 17 IB 19 10 ll 12 13 14 a ie 17 IB 19 O I1 2 a 14 5 e i 6 0 3 4 S 0 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 2 256830 08/26/88 6 @.00 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10-4504 - 510 -51 397946 _3.256B30__ - 09/02/88.__ _.___ .1._66 -. BERTELSON-BROS -INC.. _OFFICE_$UPPL -I E$ 10_4516- 16 -0 =16 399046 66_58 4 e56B30 09/06/88 68.88 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10-4516 - 160 -16 400357 6727 ° e56B30 09 /Oe /88 iee.65 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 510 -51 40065S ° 08_/_30/88 106.ee BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10 -4516- 310 -51 398965 ' _e96830 e56830 09 /Oe /88 e56.50 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 510 -51 39896e ° 256B30 08/30/88 457.92 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516- S10 -51 398963 ° E56B30 _ 09 /Oe /_8S_ - 104_.68___ __ERTELSON_BRO.S -INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516- 510 -51 399046 6658 0 eS6830 09/06/88 84.10 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 510 -51 399162 "IE56830 06/30/88 43.17 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 510 -51 399396 12_25683_0 08/30/88 26.73 BERTELSON BROB. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 510 -51 397228 13 e56B30 09 /Oe /88 90.30 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10-4516 - 510 -51 400653 14 e56B30 09/02/88 30.67 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 510 -51 400605 67e7 'SL eS6B30_______09/02/68 169.63 BERTELSON BROS. I_NC. _OF_FI_C_E SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 510 -51 400644 16Ie56830 09106188 37.90 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10-4516 - 510 -51 400876 17 te 1,884.25 s - 19 •� *+�• + + +-CK9 2G 21 eS683e 09/06/8_8 29_.84 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504- 5e0 -se 84913 6833 22 _ E5683e OS /EE /88 89.E5 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504- 64B�2iT�fi -9 23 E5683E 09 /OE /88 127.75 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS REPAIR PARTS 10-4540- 646 -64 84685 6540 241 246.84 0 _�yf 26 000000 •44-CKS °125694e 08 /ee /8B 26.93 BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY OFFICE SUPPLIES 6- 4516-76T7d 29I 30 26.93 3: 000000 ***-CKS 33 e56B54 _08_/26/88_ 20.00 BLUM_BERG PHOTO EQUIPMENT RENTAL 10 -4ee6- 510 -51 R93589 34 E56B54 09/02/88 20.00 BLUMBERG PHOTO EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4ee6 - 510 -51 R93956 35 "3 40.00 + 31 36 00 *000 000- 3d 89_.10 BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE ADVERTISING 10-4eie- 510 -51 a0 _e56B72____08/30_/88 256B7e 08/30/88 55.87 BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 520 -52 q1 42 144.37 s 43 • *♦AM• • * +- 44 45 256B74 _^ 99 /OO /88 129_02_ _- BRAEMAR MAILING SERV CENTRAL SERVICES e3 -4802- 611 -61 01316 i 129.02 s 47 40 4r * -CKS 49I 50 256877 09 /Oe /88 1,113.00 BRAUN ENG TESTNG INC SERVICES 10 -4201- 540 -54 03810 5886 51 E56977 09/06/88 BRAUN ENG TESTNG INC CONSTRUCTION 60 -IE70- 000 -00 Sz' - - - - -. - -- - _ese.50 1,395.50 + 53 54 256878 08/30/88 75.60 BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 520 -52 102349 55 75.60 0 56 57 256879 08/23/88 e36.00 BROCK WHITE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10-4504- 345 -30 247165 : 1 0 z e !1 !4 :s !6 17 to !e PC 11 -- 13 s- 16 17 IB 19 10 ll 12 13 14 a ie 17 IB 19 O I1 2 a 14 5 e i 6 0 3 4 S 0 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 l!, ' 1988 •CI EDINA 2,462.13 W � CHECK RE ER vIl 256822,._____08 /22/88 1 575.15 BEER WHOLESALERS _CHECK NO_ DATE_ _ AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION v 21 12-56A98 08/30/88 210.00 AVR INC REPAIR PARTS ---- - - - - -- BACH -BILL 3. 256A98 08/30/88 _ - 482.50 -__ AVR CONCRETE_ BACH -BILL ESGA98 06/30/88 210.20 _INC AVR INC _ _ _ _ CONCRETE -- 'i1'l 1,351.75 * '1 256A99 09/02/88 - - - -- 39.94 AXT -LYLE 4p, 3 39.94 * b' COST OF GOODS SOLD 256B03 09/02/88 15.95. B. R. _BENSON UNIFORM ALLOWANCE '' 256:03 08/26/88 38.57 B R. BENSON LAUNDRY v 14 256:03 08/26/88 37.10 B. R. BENSON LAUNDRY 09 -12 -88 _ 11 ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE 10- 4540 - 390 -30 85686 40 -4528- 8_03 -80 85449 40 -4528- 803 -60 85621 29- 10- 4262 - 301 -30 01498 f0- 4262 - 301 -30 26357 10- 4262 - 301 -30 26980 I,e 08/22/88 2,462.13 BEER WHOLESALERS INVENTORY 27- 4630 - 663 -66 -1� 256822,._____08 /22/88 1 575.15 BEER WHOLESALERS INVENTORY ,= 50-4630 - 842 -84 " " 4,037.28 * ----------- i_.256B05 - -- 08/26/88 - - -- - -- 63.01 ---- - - - - -- BACH -BILL — - - POSTAGE 30- 4290-781 -T8 w/'- 256B05 08/26/80 29.26 BACH -BILL GENERAL SUPPLIES 30-4504 - 781 -78 2' E56B05 f.,, 08/26/88 _ 62.38 _BACH_ -BILL GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 -_ 782-7_8 1-i256B05 0 8/26/88 59.81 BACH -BILL OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 A1,'31256B05 06/26/88 15.44 BACH -BILL PAINT 30-4544- 782 -78 l` - -- - - -- 229_90 # 1- 112561)07 08/22/88 189.40 BADGER METER INC "o .,1 189.40 s 1, d " B56813 0 01 ENGINEERING ' 729.00 � * - - -- - -- WATER METERS _PROP SERVICES 40- 1220 - 000 -00 10- 4201 - 302 -30 , I' e I- D ,0 '2 * ** -CKS , h3 a I, e i ,n ;n ,e �tv i - - -- — '2 *#* -CKS 122 13, ** *-CKS 13: _ 3n 3i 13C I3G _ 4C *� -CKS 141 *** -CKS d:i256B22 08/22/88 2,462.13 BEER WHOLESALERS INVENTORY 27- 4630 - 663 -66 -1� 256822,._____08 /22/88 1 575.15 BEER WHOLESALERS INVENTORY ,= 50-4630 - 842 -84 " " 4,037.28 * — '3 S _ ** ** * #-- - - ---- - -- - -- — #* *-CKS n 4pl, 256B27 09/06/88 191.50 BERGFORD TRUCKING — INVENTORY 5] 50- 4626 - 822 -82 'n 4, 256827 08/30/88 192.01 BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626- 822 -82 59L 256:27 256827 08/30/88 09/06/88 _ — 393.50 - 366.50 BERGFORD TRUCKING BERGFORD TRUCKING — INVENTORY- INVENTORY 50 =4626= 842 =84 - —_;ao c, 50- 4626- 842 -84 e2 4 ^- 256827 08/30/88 370.50 BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626 - 862 -86 630 «;256827 09%06%88 2 674:00 BERGFORD —TRUCKING— INVENTOR 0ib =862=8 bs ttil.,l I TT8.01 - ev *** -CKS h _I hc x''!2 56830 1256:30 09/06/88 08/30/88 76.80 72.48 BERTELSON BROS. INC. BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 7, 10 -4504- 180 -18 400654 72 10-4504- 420 -42 397228 73 ' d`j256830 09/06/68 71.96 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10-4504- 510 -51 401025 6780 7e� ,� 1988 CITY OF EDINA C_ rwr:Ew wn nsrF swMiwT i L L 11 CHECK REGISTER 09 -12 -88 PAGE 10 VPNnnD 1TPU nwaraTDT7nu Arrn11YT un fuu A 0 n m uCQQAEC- 1 , 2 3 315.13 + 2 3 4 ssssss + ++ -CKS ' e 0 e66A41 08/eeiee 71.910 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE CONCESSIONS 26 -4624- 683 -68 7 e 7 256441 08/26/88 35.60 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD 26- 4624 - 683 -68 408659 9 ° 256A41 09/02/88 418.26 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE CONCESSIONS 27 -4624- 663 -66 3741 10 D _.eS6A41____08/22/88___.____ 337.87 AMBAS.SADOR_SAUSAGE— CONCESSIONS e7 -462= 663 -66 't 12 13 10 256A41 09/02/88 183.54 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE CONCESSIONS 27 -46 :4- 663 -66 11 E56A41 08/22/88 473.92 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE CONCESSIONS 27 -4624- 663 -66 1e 12 1 520.39 + ,e 13 ,4i ••• #•+ ••# -CKS ,D -� - --- - -' - -- 20 6 e56A49 09/06/88 364.48 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY E7- 4E6E- 663 -66 21 7 :e 364.48 s 22 23 24 !D; •• #••• 201 •• +-CKS 25 26 21'856ASI 08/30_/80 2e0.00 AMERICAN RED CROSS REGISTRATION PEES 10- 4504 - 685 -6e 27 ze z2 e56A51 08/30/08 68.40 AMERICAN RED CROSS GENERAL SUPPLY f0- 4504- 6E5_–&2__0_­" 8 23 24 288.40 + 30 1 3 25� +• #• #• •••– 33 261 2]LP56A53 08/30/88 te6_66 AMERICAN SMARECOM TELEPHONE 10-4256 - 510 -51 35 3e '0; .zv 126.66 s 37 38 30 # # ##•• ••• -CKS 3D eo JI 321256A6e 0910e/88 3eeSS.40 ANDERSON –TODD PROP SERVICES 10-4e01- 630 -68 a! 42 331 328.40 # 43 as "m J6� # ## # #+ #•• -CKS . ae 47 49 " E56A80 08/E3/86 21.04 ABTLEFORD INTL REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 47906 49 38 21.04 t 50 - 401 004..4.4. 41i ### –CKS 53 64 a2'e56A94 _ 09 /OE /8S 366.85 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS REPAIR PARTS 40-4540-804 -60 14545 6597 55 5e 43: 366.85 t 57 44 ' SB 45 • * ±0•• ••• -CKS eD 60 46 a7Ie56A96 f( 08/22/88 4E.95 AUTOMOBILE SERV CTR CONTRACTED REPAIR 10-4248- 560 -56 98548 638E 6, 62 42.95 s e3 64 t0� 65 5-'tti #t# 5, #ts -CKS •e] , a —'*4 —� .E� 52 X56 ;90 53 06430a88 188 50- AUR INC CONCt1iT° E T E -4 fla 4 1- 0528— r'si —'r'r B5 or9 e, 70 34 E56A98 08/23/88 165.10 AVR INC CONCRETE 10- 4528 - 301 -30 65015 1 7z 55 256A98�870 -T8 C - - - b0' ]3 56 BSGA98 57 08/30/88 165.10 AYR INC REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 301 -30 85199 74 75 I' 1988 Cl, EDINA 268.35 -` CHECK RE ° 10- 4504 - 260 -26 50- 420.1- 8EO -82 17• ° 08/E6/88 50 -4201- 820 -8E CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR 0 50 -4E01 - 8E0_ - ,_ 1 • _82 50 -4E01 - 840 -84 - -- -- -- 13 485065 50 -4E01- 840 -84 4,248.74 • 26.40 256A10 09/06/88 909.56 ACCOUNTEMPS ] 50-4201 - 860 -86 ALBINSON 9v 1E56Af0 08/22/88 456.23 ACCOUNTEMPS 1 256A10_- _09/06/88 89.05 154_00 ACCOUNTEMPS I]i256A10 09/06/86 154.00 ACCOUNTEMPS @di "I2S6A10 08 /9E /88 124.16 ACCOUNTEMPS 490057 154.00_- ____- .A000UNTEMP3______ "iE36A10 08 /EE /88 1E4.16 ACCOUNTEMPS ,,W !E56A10 09/06/88 154.00 ACCOUNTEMPS E56A1 0 - -_ 09/06/89 _ _154._00 ACCOUNTEMPS t56A10 08 /et /88 154.00 ACCOUNTEMPS 1W '. t56AI0 09/06/88 154.00 ACCOUNTEMPS 51 t56A10 ---- ---- OB /EE /88 124.1T______AC000NTEMP9 - 6It36A10 00/11/08 134.00 _ __ ACCOUNTCMP3 10�, t36A10 09/06/88 154.00 ACCOUNTEMPS f. - ------- - - - - -- - -- 3,124.28 + I ,,w, 256A11 08 /E3 /BS 73.47 ACE SUPPLY -Z1 -- - -- -- - -- ----- 73 47 + - - - - = f i," -- - - =R 09 -12 -88 9 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 8 P.O. R MESSAGE SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REPAIR PARTS 40- 4201- 800 -80 I5 268.35 40 -4201- 800 -80 ° 10- 4504 - 260 -26 50- 420.1- 8EO -82 17• ° 08/E6/88 50 -4201- 820 -8E 9 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50- 4E01- BEO -BE 48573E 648E 0 50 -4E01 - 8E0_ - ,_ 1 • _82 50 -4E01 - 840 -84 - -- -- -- 13 485065 50 -4E01- 840 -84 14 26.40 50 -4E01- 8_40 -84 ,e 10- 4604- E60 -E6 _ 50 -4201- 840 -84 ] 50-4201 - 860 -86 ALBINSON CREDIT 50 -4EOI- 860 -86 9EEEE4 I_E56AE9___ ] E56AE9 30-4101- 860 -80 50- 4E01- 660 -86 10-4S40- 520 -52 53133 6480 ) t + + + ++ + ++ -CKS x -., 3, 256A19 08/2E/88 328.50 ADVON LAUNDRY 30- 4E6P- 78E -18 980565 31 32 328.50 + 34 35 leS6AE1 OB/E6/68 175.63 ADT SECURITY SYS. I. i - - - -- - - - - - - -- -- 175.83 + - -- = E56A22 - __09 /OE /88_ -- 131_.50 _- AIR COMFORT -INC_- "; 131 .50 • d' + ++ +++ W *•LAC PROF SERVICES 30 -4E01- 782 -78 735450 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 540 -54 3l9-S6--53S9------- - + ++ -CKS i256A29 06/22/86 268.35 ALBINSON GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 260 -26 486976 ..E56AE9 08/E6/88 .___- ___67.30 _ ALBINSON GENERAL SUPPLIES 10-45_04- 646 -64 48573E 648E E56AE9 d " 08 /EE /B8 150.10 ALBINSON BLUE PRINTING 10- 4570- E60 -Eb 485065 E56A99 09/06/88 26.40 ALBINSON LUMBER 10- 4604- E60 -E6 49005E 08/E2/88_ _ _87.5_0- ALBINSON CREDIT 10- 4604- E60 -E6 9EEEE4 I_E56AE9___ ] E56AE9 08/E9/8a 89.05 _ ALBINSON LUMBER 0 =4304= 980 =t6 X85004 S '1856AE9 09/06/86 111.07 ALBINSON LUMBER 10- 4604 - 260 -E6 490057 E56AE9- _ - 09/09/88 - - - 459.00 - - - -1 ALBINSON EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4909 - 260 -26 489261 , 083 . T7 s - -- -- -- - 256A30 08/26/88 28.00 ALFONS ANDERSON COST OF GOODS SOLD w' 256A39 08/26/88 21.60 ALTERNATOR REBUILD REPAIR PARTS 1.256A39 08/22/88 68_00_ ALTERNATOR REBUILD REPAIR PARTS "1256A39 06/22/86 131.96 ALTERNATOR REBUILD TOOLS 256A39 08/82/88 93.57 ALTERNATOR REBUILD REPAIR PARTS s ET- 4630 - 663 -66 3745 +•+ -CKS 10- 4640 - 620 -62 1686 10- 4540 - 560 -56 11378 6412 10- 4580 - 560 -S6 ISSS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 1583 a a: a: 141 q! -4s 5i 53 54 5s 5] 150 159 - -,60 61 4 ' 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER - - - - - - -- - -- - - -- - - -- - - - -- 09 -12 -88 PAGE 8 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. N MESSAGE �z I� 256821 09/06/88 _ __ 15.00 _ MN CTY_ATTORNEY___ -_ _.BOOKS -__, -- _ -- 10- 4502- 420 -42 3 I 15.00 • ° I es66ee 09/06/6$ 6e.50 MPH INDUSTRIES COUIP MAINT 10- 4e74- 4e0 -4e 39799 7 ° 256822 09/06/88 62.50 MPH INDUSTRIES EQUIP MAINT 10 -4274- 420 -42 34797 0 OI 256822 09/06/88 86.90 MPH INDUSTRIES EQUIP MAINT 10-4274- 420 -42 39798 ' I141 "j 256823 09/06/88 105.00 THE PLAYWRIGHTS CTR SALARY REG EMP 10- 4105- 6eT -6e lie - - -- - - - - -- 1 05 _00_-• le n " 256824 09/06/88 25.00 SUE BLAIR PROF SERV OTHER 30- 4224 - 781 -78 ° o 25.00 + 20 17ie568e5 09/06/88 e5.00 ELIZ HOOD ANDERSON PROF SERV OTHER 30-4ee4- 781 -78 X234 _ ___ - -_ - ____- __-- _------ 25.00 _.- _-- - -__ -- * _ - 24 .. 256$26 09/06/$8 25.00 PHYLLIS HAYWA PROF SERV OTHER 30 -4224- 781 -7$ ,23 12fi 127 00_ • Ito !`_ - -- - - - - - -- 7. e56827 09/06/88 25.00 MARGARET GUST PROF SERV OTHER 30 -4284- 781 -78 31 I 25_00 • e568e8 09/06/88 e5.00 HELEN ZABEL PROF SERV OTHER 30-4ee4- 781 -78 3`f 3i h !- 25.00 • 3' eS6829 09/06/88 161.00 MSHS PLANTINGS & TREES 10- 4560- 644 -64 38 161.00 • 40 !..-- - ---- --- ---- -- - - -- -- ---- --- - --- - 14i e56830 09/06/88 17.70 POLICE -PETTY CASH CABLE TV 10 -e149- 000 -00 4�V '43 I 256830 09/06/88 91.19 POLICE- PETTY_ CASH _ ME_TING_EXPE_NSE 10 -4206- 420 -42 -- 41 - -45 256830 09/06/88 97.02 _ POLICE -PETTY CASH MILEAGE 10 -4208- 480 -42 - 1256830 09/06/88 187.80 POLICE -PETTY CASH GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 46 4] 256830 09/06/88 99.10 POLICE -PETTY CASH GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 492.81 * 4fl SO 'I ~� e56831 09/06/88 -_ _ _ -- -- 225.00 -_ GFOA /ESC _ CONF 8 SCHOOLS 10-420e- 160 -16 - 57. _ 225.00 • �4 ..f e5683e 09/06/68 3e.ee AUTO FONE BERV CTR EQUIP MAINT 10-4e74- 4e0 -4e 7630 a° Dept._of Pro2ertx Tax & Public Rec. °o- " 256833 09/06/88 134.10 POSTAGE _- _ -- - 14 0 -1 4 10- 4290 - 140 -14 - - -- - - -- - - - e -- 7 - _ 1 34.1 0 • d 12 - i'-L- 256834 09/06/88_ 7_0_.0_0 MN CITY MANAGEMENT DUES 10- 4204 - 140 -14 d3 64 �. - - - - - _ -_- 70.00 • I � fifi v, e56835 09/06/88 25.00 GOVT TRAINING SERV CONF b SCHOOL 10 -4202- 100 -10 -- ---- -- - - -- ---- - - - - -- --- -e9 c;.I 25.00 • -o # # #-CKS 7 72 ►.,,IS'!256AO9 08/23/88 4,248.74 AAA LICENSES 6 PERMITS 10-4310 - 560 -56 ;s �q:a 1988 zI EDINA CHECK RE ER 09 -12 -88 _ 7 J CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. M MESSAGE .j2 III i 318.06 + 256805 09/06/88 4,402.35 FLANAGAN SALES ACCT RECEIVABLE 10 -1139- 000 -00 3294 6403 AI 09/06/88 2,884.00 FLANAGAN SALES GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504- 647 -64 3126 5557 1256805 h j -- .-- ----- - -_ - -- _286_35 • _ -- Q1 "256606 09/06/68 123.40 ARTHUR LINDMAN AMBULANCE 10 -3180- 000 -00 of -- -- ---- -- -- -- - --- - - - - -- - - -- - - - -1- 23._40_ !-- -- ---- - - - -'— ______ _ 256807 09/06/88 175,057.00 EDINA FIRE DEPT POLICE AID 1% 10 -3311- 000 -00 175,057_00 + I ",256808 09/06/88 29.85 PLAN TO GET OUT ALIVE FIRE PREVENTION 10 -4650- 440 -44 - -- - - - --- -- -- - - -- - - - - -- - -- - -- —.. - - -- - - -89 eS.. '------ 115 -, ---------- - - - --- - 0''i LIS6809 09/06/86 14.00 JON HOBBS DUE FROM HRA 10 -1145- 000 -00 - - -- — 14.00 + - 0I'- =`256810 09/06/88 25.00 MN POLICE CHIEFS ADVERTISING 23- 4214 - 611 -61 20638 z I- S,`'256811 09/06/68 25.11 - WEIS AM FIRE EQUIP CREDIT 10- 4540- 440 -44 01579 z.! 256811 09/06/88 2,141.46_ WEI8 AM FIRE EQUIP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 440 -44 6595 I' 256811 - 09/06/88 1,655.10 WEIS AM FIRE EQUIP EQUIP REPLACE 10-4901 - 440 -44 30965 5694 d " 3,771.45 + 256812 09/06/86 794.00 SPECIALTY EQUIP EQUIP REPLACE 10- 4901- 440 -44 71811 6467 A! �, 794.00 + 256813 09/06/88 - 1,472.50 C 6-W TURF NURSERY 800 b BLACK DIRT E7 -4562- 664 -66 2766 6723 1,472.50 + 256814 09/06/88 126.11 MILDRED LARSON AMBULANCE 10 -3180- 000 -00 126.11 + - -- e56815 - - o9p,9610,88 - - - -- e. oe OLD PR OF SERVIOES eT 4eOl - 654 -55- iE56815_._- „____09/08/88__ e.00 ROGER HARROLD ROGER HARROLD PROP SERYIGES PROF SERVICES el -66 E7 -4201- 664 -66 ^= !E56816 - .,i - - -- 09/06/88 - -- 64._00 ROBERT LINDNER CONTRACTED REPAIRS 40 -4248- 800 -80 64.00 + 256617_ _ 09/06/88_ - _117.50 CTR FOR DESIGN TECH SCHOOL 10 -4202- 440 -44 7682 6468 <c E56817 09/06/88 117.50 CTR FOR DESIGN TECH SCHOOL 0=4202 = 490 =49 -7682 —6468 -- •r l— 235.00 + 1256818 09/06/88 905.00 UNIQUE INSTALLATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 440 -44 132 6205 S 905.00 + 256819 09/06/88 1,800.00 IMPULSE CONCEPT INC CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10-4E48- 646 -64 2086 -8 6703 ® °I 1,800.00 + =1256820 09/06/86 58.20 8T. PAUL CANDY CONCESSIONS 27-4624- 663 -66 219807 a 9 10 „ ,z u u n . iaS �5c 00 e0 co at -i ! 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 09 -1e -88 PAGE 6 CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. N MESSAGE 11 .00 s �: . e56786 08/30/88 146.00 TRUSTEE MPTF PROF SERV OTHER I, 30- 4224 - 781 -78 146.00 • ie i256787 - 08/30/88 - - -- 50.00 e AMY ANDERSON PROF SERVICES 30 -4201- 781 -78 e 50.00 • 256788 08/30/88 616.00 VALLEY PAVING CONTRACTED REPAIRS 40 -4e48- 800 -80 - - :3 i•; 616.00 • is 'i 856789 09!01!811 • 49.45- ° BOOtf$ O�tSOr •wn a� ,7 Iie ROWER RHONE BOOKS tsOg>gg�gg_ 256789 06/30/88 - -- - 49.45 POWER PHONE - -- BOOKS 10- 4502 - 420 -42 ° 49.45 • - -- -- -- - - -- �z i e56790 08/30/88 - -- - 11.50_ -- -- -- - - - -1 - BRUNER - -- -- GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 - 78 zz 23. 1 .50 s 211 23 251,791 _ -_ ____08/30/88 _ _- - 226._67 _ ASCAP- _ -- - - -- DUES 2S- 4204 - 701 -70 2G 27 V 226.67 4- ---- - - - - -- - - - - - - -- ze 256792 _ 08/30/88 _ e78.60 DAVID VELDE CONFERENCE 10 -420e- 480 -48 30 2 56792 69/01!88 278.60- DAVID VELDE CONFERENCE - - 2=4[;0 8 3 ^ 256793 08/30/88 e4.32 HUDSON PHOTO INDUST GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -Tg__3 6 i3- "I 32 . 24 s �3n L ' 256794 OS 730/88 E50.00 YOUR SPECIAL EVENT ADVERTISING 30- 4e14 -7 781 =78 aglC 250.00 s ac a. 143 •��sy• - -- -- - -- ivM-CK9 " 256797 - - 09/06/88 RIEKE CARROLL MULLER SERVICES 40 -4201- 800 -80 1089 148 a7 _292.50 292.50 = a° 256798 __- 09/06/88 - - - -- 724_.91 -y -- SEH - -- SERVICES 40 -4e01- 800 -80 e630 sc '51 724.91 - - - -- - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - -- - - - -- �: . 256799 09/06/88 - -- ee.00 BETTER CARE MED FIRST AID SUPPLY 10- 4510- 440 -44 114289 22.00 s 57 1;,256800- 09/06/88 70.43 - FRANCIS CALLAHAN - -- - - - -- MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 480 -48 70.43 s -- - _ _ 1112 1°°1256801 -- - -- 09/06/88 -- - - -- 5,6_ 33.12 HARDRIVES INC. PAYMENT 60 -2040- 000 -00 1 l.3 i - . - 5,637 1L s - -- Ga IG: n9 256802 09/06/88 61.75 MN AUTO DAMAGE -- REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 42160 G7` 61.75 + - - -- 256803 09/06/88 - - - - -- UNDERGROUND PIERCING CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10-4248- 390 -30 500594 70 71 sI 171 .66 * - 72 7., ,7 256904 09/06/88 318.06 GTE SUN COMM DIRECT ADVERTISING 23 -4214- 611 -61 74 75 1988,CI EDINA CHECK RE ER 09 -12 -88 1`= 25678008/30/88 - - - -- - - _- 25.20 ED GLANDER MILEAGE 40- 4208 - 806 -80 1., CHECK_N_0_DATE -_ - VENDOR _- —_ -- ITEM DESCRIPTION __ - -- ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. • --AMOUNT -__ - -. �2 %r qtr ��G DO LG9 LGG n ,BS4 00 08/30/88 KERRI DAHLSTROM SUP nn GENERAL , 6Y 10 4504 647 64 3ie6 555 ' 256770 08/30/88 _ 200.00 KERRI DAHLSTROM RENTAL INCOME 30 -3507- 000 -00 -_ X1'7 200.00 � - ------- ---- - - - - -- - E!'I ,1256782 08/30/88 219.84 KAPAK CORP GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 39309 e 219:84 » TVIeI2S6771 08/30/88 44.00 AMER RED CROSS SCHOOL 30- 420E - 781 -78 - - -- .._ -- - -- - -- - - -_44 -00 o - - - S i 1256784 08/30/88 -- MICHAEL 8IITARI -10 ',256772 08/30/88 103.13 SCHWAB VOLLHASER HEAT 10 -4254- 630 -62 1104 - -- - - - - -- -- 256785 - - - - -- - - E P EV 0- 465-0- 444 -44- PROF SERV OTHER 30-4224 - 781 -78 RE- PREVENT -ION 1 -0- _4650- 440-44 103.13 s . ., 2 BtrtkN- io `3+80 -000 00 e! '� �B677a I" 111:41 N ! P—A AMBULANCE 256773 - - - -- 08!30/80 - - — _44.25_ N. F. P. A. BOOKS 6 PAMPHLETS 10-4502- 440 -44 98479 44.25 + v:r, R4i*R* - - d- 3i256T75 2 1 08/30/88 422.60 HENN CTY COMM HEALTH SUPPLIES 10- 4510- 440 -44 e3 42i. - - -- - -- -- -- - — 44- 6-i-+ -61 - 06.38- 40 - - -- 422.60 +----------- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- —_ – - -- -3 31 -F-00 0- 0 0 L -r C E-A I D-1-Y. i�0 ;E56776 08/30/88 154.01 TRIGG IND INC LUMBER 10-4604- 260 -E6 3304 6565 154.01 s 256777 _ _ 08/30/86 _ _ 34,977.0_0_ PRO TRUCKS__ EQUIP REPLACEMENT 10-49_01- 305 -30 "1L56TTT 08/30/88 9 34,77.00 PRO TRUCKS E-QUIP REPLACEMENT 10- 4901- 30°� -30 •II' "I 4 69,954.00 • MESSAGE #ws -CKS 11 2 e 17 e 9 10 11 113 14 113 121 122 123 41 42 <n 256778 08/30/88 41.95 GFOA BOOKS 10- 4502 - 160 -16 I 4:f •lI 1 ssex *+ 1`= 25678008/30/88 - - - -- - - _- 25.20 ED GLANDER MILEAGE 40- 4208 - 806 -80 1., 25.20 • - - 256761 08/30/88 30.00 VASA JR FOLK DANCERS PROF SERVICES 30- 4201 - 781 -78 r 30.00 - -- - - - -_ X1'7 ,1256782 08/30/88 219.84 KAPAK CORP GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 39309 219:84 » �''� •ss•s� S i 1256784 08/30/88 139.74 MICHAEL 8IITARI UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10- 4266- 420 -42 139.74 • 17 256785 08/30/88 11.00 TC MUSICIANS UNION PROF SERV OTHER 30-4224 - 781 -78 r Pti- «0• —CKS �4 I,. a ' 1988 c/ry OF so/wA , CHECK mo.DAIE.__- ^/emarsa 08/30/88 " es6756 oa,so/oa .^/ .'. - AMOUNT .. | es- or-o -_-__o e-;i v-___----- /=. -- -'- --- e96761 0e^30,88 cxsxx ecnxarsn vsmuon _ leso vyeoCOOTIES oowv 1e.50 -.----1Vo9cuurIsa-Cuwx--- srso ~ ee. so ee.so-- ee.so ,e.s° --_'1 e, so. ,ea* srso * 1'rsw.00 1'7s*.ou * is 9 --i —e- 689.0e * -------- ---' 48.60 *o.wo * ITEM-DESCRIPTION AnCouwr NO. xwv AovsnrImIwn so-4el4-e4e-84 __Mw JAYCEES *nvem`wxww MN J*Ycsso AnvseTxnIww v*rmnL,v ^wwu«L ^mvznrImIww CATHOLIC ANNUAL ADVERTISING 50-*e14-86e-86 50-4=l4-wec-8e sw-*ei4-8*e-e4 r^M*n^nw °"VLmr;5x -412,e- ---'-----'------------- vy-,e-ou pAos ^ w P.O. w mcoaAns � ,o.nn * _ --_ ~. .~.�.~ .~ 'Z7 - - .- -_- -___---' _-___-_---_---- csarao 06r30/88 489.0 0 unw rsn i ��------' �. *oy.wo * - -' '-- '- -- esara^ om/ o/ oo esej0 0 PC MAINTENANCE � 252.00 * ---'-- -----'- 10-4~08-t10-=1 "~P-" �` - ---- / `'eyaras 08/3*/88- -- --686.�07 ------- DAN -9 - JOHNSON --------CONTRACTED REPAIRS my ~ aoa.or * -- eso7aa ow,so,00 e4. ---- B�-C it i P-T-1 0 N w --' '--'- REPAIR 8961!6:p 61 .75 � �2567*7 06^30/88 108.00 rnwwx mwmxL owIm wwp pn*� o �'--'' ~`-"~''-"°°-° � > ' . 1as6768 08/30/88 19.00 LINDA u000urnom nsoIarn»rInm rcsa 10-3sow-000-00 " " , " " .. " " " '^ " .. 1 25 318 06- i vmnA ADVER i�. ,n.00 57 e56769 - 08,36/867 -- --- ---�� ��----�-'�m��'disrfo�'-----'-' - s41o7 1 N 7. ' Sy*7w7 ww/o*/ww / esarsr ---- om^so^ow ------- | esaysr ' 08/30/86 | = '� esorso om,so,wm = esa75m_____08/3u/a8________ ' m5675e `. 08,30^88 �- |� ., eyar5 o ./ - - --- 0m,uo /so .. | es- or-o -_-__o e-;i v-___----- /=. -- -'- --- e96761 0e^30,88 cxsxx ecnxarsn vsmuon _ leso vyeoCOOTIES oowv 1e.50 -.----1Vo9cuurIsa-Cuwx--- srso ~ ee. so ee.so-- ee.so ,e.s° --_'1 e, so. ,ea* srso * 1'rsw.00 1'7s*.ou * is 9 --i —e- 689.0e * -------- ---' 48.60 *o.wo * ITEM-DESCRIPTION AnCouwr NO. xwv AovsnrImIwn so-4el4-e4e-84 __Mw JAYCEES *nvem`wxww MN J*Ycsso AnvseTxnIww v*rmnL,v ^wwu«L ^mvznrImIww CATHOLIC ANNUAL ADVERTISING 50-*e14-86e-86 50-4=l4-wec-8e sw-*ei4-8*e-e4 r^M*n^nw °"VLmr;5x -412,e- ---'-----'------------- vy-,e-ou pAos ^ w P.O. w mcoaAns � ,o.nn * _ --_ ~. .~.�.~ .~ 'Z7 - - .- -_- -___---' _-___-_---_---- csarao 06r30/88 489.0 0 unw rsn i ��------' �. *oy.wo * - -' '-- '- -- esara^ om/ o/ oo esej0 0 PC MAINTENANCE � 252.00 * ---'-- -----'- 10-4~08-t10-=1 "~P-" �` - ---- / `'eyaras 08/3*/88- -- --686.�07 ------- DAN -9 - JOHNSON --------CONTRACTED REPAIRS my ~ aoa.or * -- eso7aa ow,so,00 e4. ---- B�-C it i P-T-1 0 N w --' '--'- REPAIR 8961!6:p 61 .75 � �2567*7 06^30/88 108.00 rnwwx mwmxL owIm wwp pn*� o �'--'' ~`-"~''-"°°-° � > ' . 1as6768 08/30/88 19.00 LINDA u000urnom nsoIarn»rInm rcsa 10-3sow-000-00 " " , " " .. " " " '^ " .. 1 25 318 06- i vmnA ADVER i�. ,n.00 57 e56769 - 08,36/867 -- --- ---�� ��----�-'�m��'disrfo�'-----'-' - s41o7 1 N 7. 1988 •CI F EDINA CHECK RE ER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR SCRIPTION 09 -12 -88 ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE 2 256737 08/$2/88 __- 148.24._ RON _WAY _— GENERAL SUPPLY __— 10- 4504- 621 -62 4 - -- 148.24 s - - - - - - -- IE1256736 _Oe /22 /8A 127.20 CF DALLMAN CO CONSTRUCTION 60- 1300- OBS -22 Ia1 127.20 » — -- i °1 _256739 __ 08/22/88. ___. _ 20 .50____,___INTERNATL_- CONF` BOOKS__— 10-4502-490-49 �'�I 20.50 s - - - - -- I_ i3 "I. I� 4 a n 5 s 3 s 'e I7 le ° fo I" 1: 'I 3 ' I I4 ' 256740_ 08/22/88____ 55_36 CYBEX GENERAL SUPPLY 30- 4504 - 783 -78 167345 6284 e fe 55.36 » — :7 fe 256741 08/23/88` - -- 132 ._Q0,__,_ —_ALL AM MECH_I_NC PLUMBING PERMIT 10 -3110- 000 -00 2O 0 132.00 • -- ':1 33 256742 00/23/88— 285.00 SHARE AMBULANCE 10-3180- 000 -00 1Z; -- - 285.00 » z4 256743__ _08/23/88 4e, 40 TOM TOTALL __ — - -- EQUIPMENT RENTAL 10 -4226- 301 -30 za zi 3, 42.40 • - -m » » » -CKS 3z ,256746 08/30/86 59.63 BARB PETERSON MILEAGE 30 -4208- 781 -78 133 3e 37 11256747 06/30/88 79.20 ROORDA SALES REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540- 664 -66 5279 13 — - -- — -- - - - -- 79.20 » 139 40 141 256748 08/30/88 72.00 JL ENTERPRISES CRAFT SUPPLIES 23 -4588- 611 -61 0948 6332 142 al 0± _ —_ -- -- — 43 as —' ''1256749 08/30/88 280.00 SHARON HALE DONATIONS 23 -3265- 000 -00 45 .4e 260 .00 » _— 1 '47 47 ' 256750 08/30/88 29.57 HARRIETTE BACH DUES 23 -4204- 611 -61 4° 50 �t - -- - - - - -- -- - - - - - -- e9.57 0 •552 I '1256751 08/30/88 114.75 LYNN ANDERSON MILEAGE 10 -4208- 600 -60 154 'i 114.75 » 73' 256752 08/30/68 74.00 ISIA SERVICES 26- 4201 - 701 -70 018266 6394 S7 59 I— -- --- - - - - -- — 74.00 » 6D' 7 256753 08/30/88 150.00 DALLAS BRASS PROF SERV OTHER 30 -4224- 781 -78 e1 ez -- 150.00 • 63' I64 01256754 08/30/88 847.66 SONIC SYSTEM GENERAL SUPPLY 10 -4504- 440 -44 684307 6196 65 lee 1 847.56 0 67' 256755 08/30/88 24.30 LYNNE PEISSIG MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 600 -60 7O "r 24_30 » ;z 73 ' C56756 7 08/30/66 12.90 1969, COOTIES CONY ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 622 -62 74 -- - " - - -- —`- _ -- 74 ' 0e-1e-6e p^os c /. 1986 CITY OF smIw« cosCw nsGzerso ] ""="" NO DATE x*ouwr wcwnoo xrsw nsaneIprxow xwowumr mw. xwv. w P.O. w msae^os | ',=�_--__- .^ 2S6710 -- o8/22/88 _----_TS-O0__--_ STEVE- GORES_ -_-_---___PROF'�[8y_OTHER . rs.00 * ` 6/aq6?j9ow/ea/ow `@�ANDmm^ wrEwm pmmr wsm, nromm 30-48m4-761-78 |`/ 75.00 ~ /^. ' es67e0 on/me/ou -e42.00 ' _ __LAIws omvns' - - __paupysov OTHER o�*2e*-781-78 __-_--- � ow �*� ~ csa?e!__'---�m^������se` �r� 30-*e r , rm roc.uo ~ ". e5672e wo/ee/oe _ ss`00 TWIN CITIES PROF_SER n aew 7w1 7m '~ L| ss . wo * |'leyoren *m,ea,mw 100.0* LORI wworwnm pnnp wsnv orxsn � 30-+em*-781-78 .' -_--__---___--_'-_-_____----100.0 esa7a*_ wexaa/mo___--2w.97 - ousm - - �m *eo^ �mo-�* |=� , e9.97 * ' 171 9.44 1es67e8 om^eo^mw 177-30 nwom s orxro CO nsp^xn pAm`w 10-4s40-560-m6 30560 ' __-'_-----_-1I?' n�w�mn ww,e�,w� �,.�� oLmwr LIwnLcww osrAIn p«mro 1*-4s*0-520-s2 ms93 |/ -41.73 ��__-_-_-_'_--__'----------_---___-_-_--- - ~� SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 7ES09 3c�es6731 08/ea/se 35.34 SNAP-ON-TOOLS CORP TOOLS 40-4SBO-801-80 e6665 !"IBS6732 08/22/88 e9o.00 SIR SPEEDY PRINT GENERAL SUPPLY 10-4504-314-30 31460 ��125673e 08/ea/as eas.00 SIR SPEEDY PRINT GENERAL SUPPLY 10-4504-3E5-30 315EE E56733 08/22/88 90.00 CY TURNSLADH CONTRACTED REPAIRS e3-4248-612-61 .. ` e56734 no/ee/ow 50.00 rom pnzw CONTRACTUAL asnvICsw 30-4ee4-781-78 -----_50`00-��-_-__---_--__-__-_'___-- |, ~^ 12 4 " '^ a°oo |^ 1 6237 55 o 14 '' " ~ e e C e C C t c d 1� e �e e d 1988 cI" EDINA CHECK RE ER 09 -12 -88 _ t lr\ CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. R P.O. 0 MESSAGE 2 255C51 08/22/88 670.60 COMM OF REVENUE GASOLINE 10- 4612 - 560 -56 1 2 4 ' •0000• *0• -CKS 6 e 7256702 08/22/88 40.00 MILLER POWER EOUIP CONTRACTED REPAIRS e7 -4248- 664 -66 9 6 40.00 * 9 11 1O e56703 08/22/88 31.62 TARGET GENERAL SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 661 -66 ,3 �" ,z 31.62 • 'a ,e ,e 3 256704 08 /ee /88 1,387.00 BUSINESSLAND SERVICE CONTRACT 10- 4288 - 510 -51 1147e 6463 17 ^1 °I 256704 08 /ee /88 700.00 BUSINESSLAND SERVICE CONTRACT 10- 4288 - 510 -51 11473 6463 16 " e56Z0-4 0- 8- 4ee%98— 4- L29Q__ . BUSINESSLAND OFFICE EQUIPMENT e5- 4906 - 510 -5/ 57002 6446 19 20 6,377.00 • 21 22 ° 7 6 e56705 08 /e2 /88 174.e7 KORTUEM SALES REPAIR PARTS e7- 4540- 666 -66 4892 23 2a zoI 174.27 • 25 26 2' ;z¢306 08/22/88 549.99 METRO MECH CONTRACT CONTRACTED REPAIRS e6- 4e48- 68e -68 13725 27 2 22 549.99 • 23 24 256707 OB /ee /88 416.73 A PLUS PRESORT POSTAGE 10-4290- 510 -51 7899 3t '5 416.73 * 33 26, !�_e56TOB 08 /eeiee 189.00 HERMAN SALES 6 SERV SERVICE CONTRACTS 10 -4288- 510 -51 1683 3' 36 V0 29 189.00 • 3 38 30 256709 08 /2e /88 14.00 BETTY FRIEDRICHS DUE FROM HRA 10- 1145- 000 -00 40 31 14.00 * 4, 32 42 33 256710 OB /2e /88 79e.80 PARAMOUNT CERAMIC COST OF COMMODITIES e3 -4624- 613 -61 69050 606E 47 44 34 35 79e.80 • 43 46 36 256711 08/22/88 48.00 LIZ GEREBI SWIM PROGRAM 30-3511- 000 -00 - 46 37 38 39 48.00 * 49 Sp' 51 52 40 41 e56712 08 /ee /S8 376.30 SHADYWOOD TREE E %P TREE ASSMT 60- 1300 - 088 —ee 33 84 e2 376.30 • ss 66 43 44 45 *0000* * ** —CKS s7 30 e9� ea el 46 256714 08/22/88 80.55 HENN CTY DEPT OF POSTAGE 10-4290-140-14 47 80.55 * e2 48 63 ee 49 256715 08/22/88 60.00 SUBURBAN PARATRANSIT ACCTS RE 0 -t 3 -00 - 65 30 51 -- 60.00 * 66 67 68 52 e56716 08 /e2 /88 e50.00 YOUR SPECIAL EVENT ADVERTISING 30 -4214- 781 -78 69 53 54 250.00 • 70 71 2 " 256717 08/22/88 150.00 SCOTT DAVIES PROF BERV OTHER 30-4224 - 781 -78 73 76 57 150.00 * 70 77 7 j 1988•CI' EDINA CHECK RE cR 09 -12 -88 - 27 CHECK NO_ DATE _- — AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. R P.O. M MESSAGE �I31 1,049.00 • I' 3 I4 �• » » » »» » »s -CKS 3 i e `I.256N50 08/26/88 320.16__ NO STAR WATERWORKS REPAIR PARTS 40 -4540- 803 -80 28030 6481 ;s, 320.16 s-------- - - - - -_ ..- - - - - -- - B is — -- -- ---- - - - - -- - - - -- — rrr—CKS .,z ♦� ie56N68 09/06/86 617.55 NORTHSTAR ICE INVENTORY 50- 4632 - 842 -84 1:3 - - - - - - - - -- - - -- -- 617_._55 • e sss -CKS e ID , 256N72 08/22/88 1 225.08 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES 6 TUBES 10 -4616- 560 -56 - - -z1 1,225.08 » e56N76 -_ 08/22/98 -- — 250.07 NTCC INC. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 646 -64 M12201 ss» =CKS z3 2e iz7\ 30 3', 3 3J 13 133 , 37 3 70 —. 40 41 42 43 44 43 Ion —rVQ I47141 �.1 ;256017 L56017_______- "IZ5001T �f'i256017 09/06/88 08/22/88 _ _ - oe/EE /aa Oa /22/86 250.07 * OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE PRODUCTS PRODUCTS PRODUCTS PRODUCTS OFFICE EQUIPMENT OFFICE EOUIPMENT SERVICE CONTRACTS OFFICE SUPPLIES e5- 4906 - 510 -51 _e5_ -_ 4906 - 510 -5_1 30-4Eaa— Tal -7a 30-4516 - 761 -76 - - -- ,4P 4B 72 33 134 33 -i ��. 256N8e 08/22/88 48.90 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY CRAFT SUPPLIES 23 -4588- 611 -61 151335 PRINTING - - -- - - - -- - - - -- - 48- _90_* Ar 312.00 s e, _I I'' 256N94 09/06/88 18.33 MN. AMVETS NEWS ADVERTISING 50 -4211- 822 -82 �' 256N94 09/06/88 18.33 MN. AMVETS NEWS ADVERTISING 50- 4214- 84e -84 258N94- ___ 09/08/88 — 18.34 — _ - - -MN. - ---- AMVETS ----- NEWS - - - - - - --- -- ADVERTISING 50- 4214- 86e -86 jl CONCESSIONS 55.00 » 3T50 e6 f, 7, - -- — -- -- — �r, - -- - - -- — — - -- - -- - - - - -- vks !! »!r! f9 7o I =,i - -- ss» =CKS z3 2e iz7\ 30 3', 3 3J 13 133 , 37 3 70 —. 40 41 42 43 44 43 Ion —rVQ I47141 �.1 ;256017 L56017_______- "IZ5001T �f'i256017 09/06/88 08/22/88 _ _ - oe/EE /aa Oa /22/86 966.00 1_ -_ ,4.87:00 E6.08 66.00 2,547.88 ! OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE PRODUCTS PRODUCTS PRODUCTS PRODUCTS OFFICE EQUIPMENT OFFICE EOUIPMENT SERVICE CONTRACTS OFFICE SUPPLIES e5- 4906 - 510 -51 _e5_ -_ 4906 - 510 -5_1 30-4Eaa— Tal -7a 30-4516 - 761 -76 058139 6400 — - -- 05TE96 05641C 056800 ,4P 4B 72 33 134 33 »!r —CKS 30 256024 09/06/86 312.00 OFF8ET PRINTING PRINTING 10- 4606 - 510 =31 e9e64 eJ Ar 312.00 s e, _I 101 :� le, ... -ctce 03 I_..e56030 06 /aa - - - -- -- -- - -- - -- - 182.50 OLD DUTCH FOODS CONCESSIONS LT -46E4- 663 -66 3T50 e6 f, 7, 182.50 • - -- - - -- — — - -- - -- - - - - -- vks !! »!r! f9 7o I =,i - -- c •rr -Ks J - j ��_ =I E56P11 00 /30 /aa 61x.00 PARK NIC MED CTR PHY EXAM 10 -4e46- 510 -51 I. -- — -- 7 V J tow 1988 CITY OF EDINA PETTY CHECK REGISTER 09 -12 -88 PAGE e6 CHECK NO. DATE - _ - AMOUNT _ VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P.O. A MESSAGE MEETING EXPENSE 10-4e01- S09 -50 618.00 • e.80 PETTY �•«�..+ wl PARKING 10- 4204- te0 -12 08/23/88 - . +• -CKS - 17 e56Pe5 09/06/88 495.00 PEAK CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTED REPAI119 10- 4 @18 -6 646 -64 b717 08/23/88 - ;e56Pe5 es6pas 09/06/88 106 490.00 PEAK CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10- 4e48- 646 -64 659e 10- 4206 - 200 -e0 �' 09 so 490 . 00 985.00 • GONSTRUOTION --eGNTRAeT-EI3-.REFAI-RO---71-0-4e4e 64664 - - - - - -- - - - -- --- -- i « «.. «s - - - - -- - -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - - - -- - - -- - - - - - -- - - «s »-CKS E56P36 E56P36 E56P36 E56P36 ' 256P36 ZSGP36 E56P36 �= e56P36 e56P36 e56P36 2S6P36 2S6P36 E56P36 e56P36 j e56P36 E56P36 e56P36 i ESSP36 E56P36 " E56P36 e56P36 E56P36 E56P36 E56P36 e56P36 II « « « « «« " e5GP38 e56P38 e56P38 ` °� sssss0 256P40 IE56P40 " e56P40 x «000.0 ,51 256P4e 08/e3/88 33.14 PETTY CASH MEETING EXPENSE 10-2148- 000 -00 08/e3/88 16.14 PETTY CASH MEETING EXPENSE 10-4e01- S09 -50 08/23/88 e.80 PETTY CASH PARKING 10- 4204- te0 -12 08/23/88 9.8e PETTY CASH MEETING EXPENSE 10-4206 - 140 -14 08/23/88 15.50 CASH MEETING EXPENSE 10- 4206 - 200 -e0 _ 08/23/88 _ 10.00 ___PETTY PETTY CASH MEETING 10 -4206- 490 -49 08/23/88 5.40 PETTY CASH MILEAGE 10 -4208- 140 -14 08/23/88 6.17 PETTY CASH MILEAGE 10 -4208- 160 -16 08/23/88 2.99 PETTY CASH MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 510 -51 08/23/88 2.90 PETTY CASH MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 510 -51 08/23/88 10.00 CASH MEETING 10 -4280- 504 -50 _ 08/23/88 _ 2.50 _PETTY PETTY CASH POSTAGE 10 -4290- 510 -51 08/23/88 5.99 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 100 -10 08/e3/88 30.00 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 5e0 -52 08/23/88 31.65 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 623 -6e 08/23/88 16.57 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 623 -6e 08/23/88 12.04 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 624 -40 08%23/88 12.04= PETTY CASH ---SUPPLIES-- 10= 4504 = 624 =40 08/23/88 8.96 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 6e4 -6e 08/23/88 12.04 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 624 -6e 08/23/88 26.45 PETTY CASH OFFICE EQUIPMENT 10=4516 = 600 =60 08/23/88 8.37 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES e6 -4504- 682 -68 08/23/88 8.36 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES e6 -4504- 683 -68 08%23/88 15.00 ------PETTY-CASH --DUES- 29 AE04=721ZE 08/e3/88 10.46 PETTY CASH COST OF GOODS SOLD 29- 4624- 72e -72 291.21 • OS /23 /BS 466.90 PP -CE QUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540- 605 -60 T75T2Lv- -64@1 08/23/88 465.90 PFC EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 40-4540 - 805 -80 7757E3 6422 08/23/88 465.90 PFC EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 805 -80 7T57e1 6420 - - - - 1,397.70 - - - -- - - - - -- - 08/26/88 25.31 PHOTO FAST ADVERTISING OTHER 23-4214 - 611 -61 26686 08 /ee /88 7.64 PHOTO FAST ADVERTISING 23-4214- 611 -61 18276 - 08/22/88 - 6.14 - - -PHOTO FAST -- - - -- ADVERTI9ING- - 83= 4214- bY1 =b1 -18877 39.09 + 08/30/88 235.00 PHYSICIANS HEALTH AMBULANCE 10- 3180 - 000 -00 5 e e v to h, .x (1] ,a i, e .41 42 a] a4 46 47 46 49 5o 1], 52 •••-CKS 174 55 56 I57 56 ,5v ec 02 *ss -CKS 1s4 GS He 'c7 - C9 'o 71 72 71 74 7] J 1988' CI EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AOUNT -- -- -- — -- - -M- _- 235.00 • rtrirr y1.1 CHECK RE, ER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION I 1 ________S0.00 CONTROL 50.00 # / 09 -tE -88 _ E9 ACCOUNT N0. INV. • P.O. N MESSAGE — .4 I' - -- - - - - - -- -- -- - - - s s -CKS -- - 3 FIRST AID SUPPLY 10- 4510 - 440 -44 EE1252 6385 le � � I �al iiitrt y 256P48 08/22/88 36.70 PIP PRINTING PRINTING 256P48 - __.08/26/88 - 41_._90- P_IP PRINTING _ _ - PRINTING 78.60 r E56P64 08/22/88 60.00 POMMER MFG CO E56P64 08/22/88 _ - _ 192.00_ POMMER MFG CO - 252.00 r - -- 'IE56P94 09/06/88 45.00 — - -- - - -- - - 45.00 r , PUBLICITY CENTRAL E56009 08/30/88 145.00 QUALITY REFRIG vl`9i 145.00 I' ' rtrtir v ' GENERAL SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLY ADVERTISING 30 -4E14- 781 -78 E17E CONTRACT SERV 2T -4E00- 663 -66 10277 256G20 _ ho - -87.72 _ _ - - - - - - -- - - - * � -t -CKS _ . z - - -- -- - - - - -- 30 -4600- 781 -78 3246 I14 25769 :: - 30- 4600 - 781 -78 3275 I,e SERV BATTERY _ _ REPAIR # #s -CKS 10 -4540- 560 -56 ,e v 256020 09/02/88 21 10-4504- 623 -6E 015E63 6524 '22 10- 4504 - 623 -6E 015186 23 ,- ADVERTISING 30 -4E14- 781 -78 E17E CONTRACT SERV 2T -4E00- 663 -66 10277 47 11"1256R09 _08/30/88 36.66 R.L. POLK 6 CO. ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 822 -82 256R09 08/30/86 36.67 R.l_bCi DVERT -I -SIN - = 84 -E= -8-4 �. : 256R09 08/30/88 36.67 R.L. POLK 6 CO. ADVERTISING 50 -4214- 862 -86 g, - - - - -- - - -- - -- - -- - - - - -1 10....0 0 • -- 4 — z rtr -CKS x .x 13 I3 rtr-CKS 3 3 _ _3 3 3 rt• -CK9 i4 Leo �z *Mr- CKS - - -;ea e4 cos � �a 7D eo +* =CKS-- ai rr• -CKS t56R21 OB /2! /88 87.50 RED WING SHOES LAUNDRY 10-4282- 301 -30 134802 SOE7 >i 87.50 # �4 t�. ]5 0 -- — 7 256G20 _ _ 06/2E/68 _ _ _- - -87.72 _ _ - GUICK _SERV BATTERY_ REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 -_ 560 -S6 25769 2560E0 I. 09 /OE /88 47.28 QUICK SERV BATTERY _ _ REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 E6314 6364 v 256020 09/02/88 89.16 GUICK SERV BATTERY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 E6330 6546 256Q20_ -- 08/E2/B8 46.32 QUICK SERV BATTERY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 25774 256020 08 /EE /88 9.64 QUICK SERV BATTERY _ REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 E6039 �I I 280.12 # I` i rrrrrr - — 1421e560E2 _ 09/06/88 -- 80.50 QUIK PRINT PRINTING 27- 4600- 661 -66 013937 6575 256Q22 08/30/88 134.0E OUIK PRINT PRINTING 8 4T66--m- 6- 02988f da36- v. 214.5E r 47 11"1256R09 _08/30/88 36.66 R.L. POLK 6 CO. ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 822 -82 256R09 08/30/86 36.67 R.l_bCi DVERT -I -SIN - = 84 -E= -8-4 �. : 256R09 08/30/88 36.67 R.L. POLK 6 CO. ADVERTISING 50 -4214- 862 -86 g, - - - - -- - - -- - -- - -- - - - - -1 10....0 0 • -- 4 — z rtr -CKS x .x 13 I3 rtr-CKS 3 3 _ _3 3 3 rt• -CK9 i4 Leo �z *Mr- CKS - - -;ea e4 cos � �a 7D eo +* =CKS-- ai rr• -CKS t56R21 OB /2! /88 87.50 RED WING SHOES LAUNDRY 10-4282- 301 -30 134802 SOE7 >i 87.50 # �4 t�. ]5 0 -- — 7 I1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO_ DATE AMOUNT VENDOR CHECK REGISTER '. 256REE 08/28/88 --- 117.00 _ REM SUPPLIES. _ 256R22 08/22/88 45.64 REM SUPPLIES t_ 162.64 + ITEM DESCRIPTION 09 -12 -88 PAGE 30 ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. N MESSAGE — _ GENERAL SUPPLY 30- 4504- 782 -76 376366 GENERAL SUPPLY 30- 4504 - 782 -78 376367 a a _ e t *r-C1(S to is m 256R24 08/22/88 _ 586.50 RELIABLE - OFFICE 586.50 • 3 d 1a 25GR25. __09/02/88 247.60 RENTAL EQUIP_6_SALES— EQUIP REPLACE 10-4901- 650 -64 94TT 6568 15 - - 247.60 * - -- -- 17 I' — i eS6R33 08 /ee /88 5,e64.7S 256R33 _ _ 08/22/88 _ _ 3,769.95 e56R33 08 /e2 /88 _ 3,199.20 57 1'. ### -CKS do 13 12,233.90 r '. rrrrrr 6 CO ----------------- e56R35 09 /Oe /8B ee0.00 j' 256R35 08 /30/88 89.10 256R35 08/22/88 446.50 256R3S 08/22/88 _169.90 ,256R35 08/22/88 35.80 256R35 08 /ee /B8 12.90 MSGR33 - -- 08/22/88 e4.00 - LI„ -- -- ---- - - - - -- 998.20 s rrrr *• 6 CO GENERAL SUPPLY ',256R37 08 /ee /88 Se3.00 i-'2S6R37 09/02/88 423.00 GENERAL SUPPLY _ I,e46 -00 r 5976 RICHFIELD PLUMB 6 CO vj= -' 256R49 08/30/88 138.95 .256R49 08/30/88 359.00 97-45 I,- 00«00# z I'"I 256R51 09/06/88 168.94 ^'I___ l 168.94 # -I 0000## z e56R53 -- - 09/02/88 -- -- 78.5e - 78.52 • :::,,R:: _08/E6/88 _ -- 3,590.00 Ila rrr -CKS 110 2; REX DISTR. INVENTORY 50- 4630- 84e -84 2 REX_ DISTR. _ INVENTORY 50- 4630- 862 -86 Iz REX DiBTR INVENTORY 50-4632= 8 @E -82 25 RIDDLE CONTROL PROD. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 330 -30 8807e3 6eG0 RIDDLE CONTROL PROD. REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 330 -30 880237 4168 ROAD RESCUE FIRST AID SUPPLY 10-4510- 440 -44 080152 ROAD RESCUE EQUIP REPLACEMENT 10- 4901- 440 -44 080152 ROBBINSDALE FARM GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 470 -47 ROBERT B. HILL GENERAL SUPPLY 10 =504 - X40 -44 _ ROGER8 PAINTING CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10 -4248- 646 -64 141 142 •�• —CK8 Idd — _.— .— _-- - - -�43 de 41 da 4D 10 rrr -CKS is1 000-CKS 11 's3 'ad sa 57 1'. ### -CKS do 13 RICHFIELD PLUMB 6 CO CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10- 4248- S20 -Se 6eS4 6030 3 RICHFIELD PLUMB 6 CO TO -e— 44E2 3 RICHFIELD PLUMB & CO SERVICES 30 -4201- 782 -78 6328 13 RICHFIELD PLUMB E CO GENERAL SUPPLY 30- 4504 - 782 -T8 4413 6207 RICHFIELD PLUMB 6 CO GENERAL SUPPLY -4504- 8-78 30 72 4364 _- -_— —_ -3 6117 i3 RICHFIELD PLUMB 6 CO GENERAL SUPPLY 30- 4504 - 782 -78 4199 5976 RICHFIELD PLUMB 6 CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504- 78e -78 4467 6259 RIDDLE CONTROL PROD. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 330 -30 8807e3 6eG0 RIDDLE CONTROL PROD. REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 330 -30 880237 4168 ROAD RESCUE FIRST AID SUPPLY 10-4510- 440 -44 080152 ROAD RESCUE EQUIP REPLACEMENT 10- 4901- 440 -44 080152 ROBBINSDALE FARM GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 470 -47 ROBERT B. HILL GENERAL SUPPLY 10 =504 - X40 -44 _ ROGER8 PAINTING CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10 -4248- 646 -64 141 142 •�• —CK8 Idd — _.— .— _-- - - -�43 de 41 da 4D 10 rrr -CKS is1 's3 'ad sa 57 1'. ### -CKS do laz 1153 164 # ## —CKS a2 all ]0 71 ]2 �d is ' -------'— 1988 CHECK NO �-) |' ~~ / i� es |' ' ** .� " -- | . ~* ~1� |� p� es — *p as [ as as as as as as as as !zi as as as �= . � D ATE --AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. * P.O. 0 MESSAGE EDINA CHECK RE, ZR 09-le-Se " 6R77 06/22/88 loe.95 ROYAL CROWN BEV. INVENTORY 50-4632-82e-62 17 6RSI 09/0e/Se S9.81 RUBENSTEIN ZIFF COST OF COMMODITIES e3-46e4-613-61 114575 �14 S9.81 is 6R83 08/ee/Se 81.18 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON GENERAL SUPPLY 10-4504-301-30 54236 6SSI 21 4.09 to 63e7 08/ee/se 43.3e SHERWIN WILLIAMS GENERAL SUPPLY 10-4504-3e5-30 95877 4. 141 6Se7 08/ee/Se 53.00 SHERWIN WILLIAMS GENERAL SUPPLY 10-4504-646-64 94870 6303 42 6S30 09/06/88 E38.e4 SIGN CENTRAL GENERAL SUPPLIES 30-4504-78e-78 633S3 :50 SS32 08/es/Se as-6-.00 SOFTWARE FIRST CONTRACTUAL SERV CE 0- 62--T"s 6S34 08/23/88 30.96 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 183978 64 6S34 08/23/88 77.SS SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10-4S40-560-S6 184321 fiS34 08/23/88 13. 1 TH DALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 184248 6834 08/23/88 55.82 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 18443i 19 6S34 08/23/88 102.79 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-S6 184451 70 6S34 08/23/88 43.96 SOUTHDAL' FORD REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 183812 7 340.43 7 000-CKS 70, " �***�"� -f - --'--'--------------' '^les000s worcc/mw e2 ow | � /^� 22.00 * V- 09/06/e§---------11.7§1.87-- 11^7e1.87 * 125GS95 08/30/8 ------'--------- nupsnxnn pLAo`xme SW SUBURBAN CABLE GENERAL SUPPLY CABLE T e6-*so4-682-68 18603 usro 144.67 SERVICE SALES CORP OFFICE SUPPLIES 50-4516-822-82 - ***- CuS iri w *~~ C^o 811 ^ op op 0 —CRT 73 ` [5` 75 ` 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 09-12-88 PAGE 3-2- CHECK-NO-.--DATE---------A"UNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. 0 MESSAGE 1 256S45 09/02/88 34.37 ST. PAUL BOOK CRAFT SUPPLY 23-452 256S45 06/26/88 20.85 ST. PAUL BOOK GENERAL SUPPLIES 10-458�Wi�LSI 847737 -,E566,45 01.00e.108 19.1a BY. PAUL BOOK OFFICE SUPPLIED 19-4516-449-44 647667 09/0E/118 17.08 ST. PAUL BOOK OFFICE SUPPLIES e7-4516-661-66 e47660 �13 14, )11,256,445 i!56845_ 08/ee/88____ 7. 14 ST. PAUL BOOK OFFICE SUPPLIES 30-4516-7el-78 647623 401— 135.84 '17 PS6867 09/02/88 3,041.67 STORE FRONT SERVICES 10-4eOl-SO4-SO 11e3 z54 3,041.67 27 *00-CKS 304 3 .50 REICHERS GENERAL SUPPLIES 133 -_'- 09/06/8 S7.00 STREICHERS AMMUNITION 10-4S72-420-42 528 � ^ _-_-�-^"-- ! eS6377 08/e3/88 S7.60 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10-4e4S-S6Q-S6 6S!g-f6 - S7.60 42 256878 08/22/69 36.72 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP GENERAL SUPPLY 26-4504-662-68 338411 6365 45 B56878 09/06/88 163.S9 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP CONTRACTED REPAIRS 28-4E48-70E-70 343117 65Z3 256378_____0S/E3/88_____ 130.49._ SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP REPAIR PARTS 40-4540-803-80 339676 wow-CKS 53 ar.6869 08.982099 87 0 56 �***�"� -f - --'--'--------------' '^les000s worcc/mw e2 ow | � /^� 22.00 * V- 09/06/e§---------11.7§1.87-- 11^7e1.87 * 125GS95 08/30/8 ------'--------- nupsnxnn pLAo`xme SW SUBURBAN CABLE GENERAL SUPPLY CABLE T e6-*so4-682-68 18603 usro 144.67 SERVICE SALES CORP OFFICE SUPPLIES 50-4516-822-82 - ***- CuS iri w *~~ C^o 811 ^ op op 0 —CRT 73 ` [5` 75 ` 1988 CI = EDINA `:�.I FFFFFF CHECK RE ER -- - - - -- 69. 9 99 9 - - '' .- - - - --TARGET - -- -- -- ------ - - - - -. SUPPLY 69.99 + 0 112330 67 1 6714 -CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DEBCRIPTION `.I'i256895 08/30/88 144.67 SERVICE SALES CORP OFFICE SUPPLIES 3,256895 08/30/88. - .144.68 _ SERVICE, CORP OFFICE SUPPLIES gi __ 434.02 s -_— -SALES - - - - - -- n 256896 OA /30/88- _ 50.00 _ SCHENEMAN -AMY -- U- -- - SERVICES O " P56T11 80.00 s -- - CHEM. GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504- 3022 -30 146167 256701 09/02/86 7.54 TANDY CONSUMER SERV. REPAIR PARTS j� FFFFFF OFFICE SUPPLIES 09 -12 -88 33 ACCOUNT NO. INV, - k P.O. N MESSAGE 50 -4516- 842 -84 ;3 50- 4516 - 862 -86 i4 27- 4201- 662 -16 0812 5754 10- 4540- 646 -64 35633 23- 4516 - 611 -61 CONCE_S_SION_S_ 126- 4624_- 683 -68 CONCESSION — 26- 4624 - 683 -68 ° ] D 10 1 **P-CKS 112 17 to �le _ 4e 'n FFF -CKS Ile FFF- FFF- ,D 'z0 21 1 X31 3 25671 0 09/012/88 - - - - - `:�.I FFFFFF TERRY ANN SALES - -- - ... - - 12 56703 - - - -- - -- - - - - - -- -- ' OB /PP /88 -- - - - -- 69. 9 99 9 - - '' .- - - - --TARGET - -- -- -- ------ - - - - -. SUPPLY 69.99 + 0 112330 67 1 6714 35 P56T10 z, P56T05 09/02/88 11 .50 _TAYSTEE_ BAKING- CO. TERRY ANN SALES 256705 08/22/88 34.50 TAYSTEE BAKING CO. - -- SUPPLY 46.00 + j� FFFFFF OFFICE SUPPLIES 09 -12 -88 33 ACCOUNT NO. INV, - k P.O. N MESSAGE 50 -4516- 842 -84 ;3 50- 4516 - 862 -86 i4 27- 4201- 662 -16 0812 5754 10- 4540- 646 -64 35633 23- 4516 - 611 -61 CONCE_S_SION_S_ 126- 4624_- 683 -68 CONCESSION — 26- 4624 - 683 -68 ° ] D 10 1 **P-CKS 112 17 to �le _ 4e 'n FFF -CKS Ile FFF- FFF- ,D 'z0 21 1 X31 3 25671 0 09/012/88 - - - - - _ 588.30 -- -- - - -- TERRY ANN SALES - -- - CO. GENERAL SUPPLY 127 -4504- 664 -66 0 112330 67 1 6714 35 P56T10 09/02/86 140.30 TERRY ANN SALES -- CO. -- --- - ---- GENERAL - -- SUPPLY - -- -- -- - -- - - 27- 4504 - 664 -66 -- 123128 664E �p 37 726.60 + 35 39 ]_ " P56T11 08/30/88 TESSMAN SEED 6 CHEM. GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504- 3022 -30 146167 a0 354.00 6532 41 256T11 08/26/88 85.00 TESSMAN SEED 6 CHEM. GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 802 -80 149631 6486 ax X43 I • 1 00 -- -- — -- - - -- . L.Y•i ++ + + ++ 145 + ++ -CKS I4] 46 1256TP0 08/1212/88 505.00 THE PRINT SHOP GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 510 -51 7661 6641 -42 °�P56TP0 08/23/88 P96.P0 THE PRINT SHOP PRINTING 10- 4600- 628 -612 T443 '50 ' P56T120__----- _- 09/012/891292.80 THE PRINT SHOP -- 10- 4600 - 6128 -62 7730 51 P56T20 09/012/88 36.125 THE PRINT SHOP _PRINTING PRINTING 10- 4600 -6128- 627686 6580 ;53 1.130.PS F 154 X57 :4 95 l•s 256T26 '�- - - 08/30/88 - -- - - - -- - 50.75 -- -+ THERMAL CO. - - --- GENERAL SUPPLY 28- 4504- 702 -70 M60159 6442 50- eo 50.75 -- el V 17 iez 4 111111 FFF —GKS IRa - 165 30I256T36 08/23/88 15.50 TISDEL STANDARD REPAIR PARTS 10-4540- 560 -56 4057 In6 °] fp 54 •FSFFF FFF-CKS ]I n . 72 11256T40 08/23/88 100.91 TOLL COMPANY WELDING SUPPLY 10-4610 - 560 -56 431798 73 5� 1 00.91 + 74 1] 75 ! JI 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 09 -12 -88 PAGE 34 jl CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. R P.O. N MESSAGE Ie56T53 08/30/88 7,e80.ee TRACY OIL GASOLINE 10 -461e- 560 -56 Te699 6497 I -' 09/02/88 183.70 T, eeo_ee • PARTS 10- 4540- 390 -30 789924 6534 G- -id1IE56U14 08/23/88 26.90 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 5E0 -SE 784763 z,256U14 09/02/88 e03.37 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP I'' I° e56T7e oe /ee /88 46.60 TROPICAL 8N0 OF MN CONCESSIONS e6 -46e4- 683 -68 ` e56T72 oe /ee /ee 966.00 TROPICAL 8NO OF MN CONCESSIONS e6- 46e4 - 683 -68 8578 - - - — - - 1 012.60.-* -- -- - -, -- - - - -- - — �-I''� e56T88 08/30/68 13e.70 TWIN CITY HOME JUICE INVENTORY 50- 463e- 84e -84 , '- E56T88 081E2 /88 30.12 TWIN CITY HOME JUICE INVENTORY 50 -4632- 862 -86 - 162. 82 • z: - 1111!1 - - - -- - e58T91 08 /E2 /88 1,354.24 TWIN CITY TESTING CONTRACTED REPAIRS 40 -4248- 801 -80 8850e1 t- I -. -- UNIVERSITY OF MN -- - C 0 N F d 1 , 354.24 t - -- ` - -' IJ �.. 256UeO -L'Sacrea 09/02/88 09v'0ey'e8 5,000.00 5,e00.00 UNIVERSITY OF MN UNIVERSITY Or- MN CONF 8 GANF SCHOOLS 27-4202- 661 -66 8 80110068 a? 4802 664 =04- e56U05 09/06/88 - - -- - se. 06_ - - -- U8 WEST CELLULAR - -- - — - -- - EQUIP RENTAL 10-4ee6- 4e0 -4e 52. 0 6 - -- - ! -- -- -- - - - -- e56U08 09 /06 /se 4,436.86 UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10- 4866- 4e0 -4e 1'1 e56U08 09/06/86 - 35.50 _• UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10- 4266- 430 -42 08/30/88 283.35 _ __ UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 440 -44 12037 "/256U08 256U08 09/06/88 244.00 UNIFORM UNLIMITED GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 I�,'- - -- -- - 4,999.71 5483 I4�IE56U14 09/02/88 183.70 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 390 -30 789924 6534 G- -id1IE56U14 08/23/88 26.90 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 5E0 -SE 784763 z,256U14 09/02/88 e03.37 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP GENERAL SUPPLY eT -4504- 664 -86 777456 6261 413.97 • I 17 256U17 08/30/88 47.90 UNITOG RENTAL SERV. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 482 -48 333858 " -- 47.90 # I ^1256U20 09/06/88 - 145.60 -- UNIVERSITY OF MN -- - C 0 N F d SCHOOL T0=4202- 420 =42 - -- ` - -' IJ �.. 256UeO -L'Sacrea 09/02/88 09v'0ey'e8 5,000.00 5,e00.00 UNIVERSITY OF MN UNIVERSITY Or- MN CONF 8 GANF SCHOOLS 27-4202- 661 -66 8 80110068 a? 4802 664 =04- 13 is _,_�.+ *-CKS- -- ---- I• - ItIs e 4 e 0 i14 qk '3 jle 004 ID ^° *** -CKS 12 IZ i3 13 13 ** *-CKS 3 �3 3 3 ** *-CKS 3 a 4 40 * ** -CKS 'Ot I" sz :31,4 * ** -CKS ez �14 eJle4 s*s -CKS In1I4 4 198$ CI EDINA `,,--CHECK NO. DATE �2 rrrrrr _. e56U30 09/06/88 I'I "I' rrrrrr CHECK RE ER 09 -12 -88 35 - AMOUNT - VENDOR -_ ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE 61.50 U8 WEST PAGING SERVICE CONTRACTS — - - -6 -1 .5 0- - -'— — — -- -- - - - - - -- - e56V1S 08/30/88 e77.e0 VAN PAPER CO. PAPER SUPPLIES 277.20 • - - - rrr-CKS 30 -4988- 781 -78 rrr -CKS 10- 4514 - 590 -Se e190S1 6S87 12 13 ,e 'e le O II , 2 ' --, 3 ,:41 ne lie *rr -CKS „ X19 E56V30 -_._._ 09/02/88 __ ___ -. __..._ 128.56__. VANTAGE ELECTRIC - e7-4201- 662 -66 010339 6785 _ - -- 20 iE56V30 09/06/88 34e.e9 VANTAGE ELECTRIC SERVICES ET -4e01- 664 -66 010327 6834 21 _. "Ie56V30 08/26/88 e19.10 VANTAGE ELECTRIC PROF SERVICES 30- 4201- TSe -78 010334 j22 - - - -- - - -- — - -- - - -- 689_95 « - -- - _ ;2e �23 rrrrrs *44-CKS 27 v '28 2 e56V35 09/06/88 9.50 VAUGHNS DUP CABLE TV 10 -e149- 000 -00 32ee7 9.50 • 30 131 i" srrrsr rrr-CKS 3, x e56V40 - -- -09/01 /88 -- - -- - - - -- -- -- - -- - -- -- -- - - - - -- - -- I36 27$ .60 e78.60 VELDE CONFERENCE 10 -4eoe- 480 -48 I.DI 39 • }rrr• - -- - -- ---- - - - - -- - -- - 000-CKS l4i Qi:� -.r 0 °°• ^^ 750 0 1F6fi13 •PEE VC -Hf9�E RENTAL E9^viPMENT a:p 4eefi 6e 00- 14? 4z ddeea°° _ _750.00_ _ _VERBAT_ILE VEIIIeLE RENTAL = - EQUIPMENT eT 44Q_efi -6Go 66 `3'Ie56V43 06 /e3 /86 - 750.00 VERSATILE VEHICLE RENTAL EQUIPMENT e7 -4976- 665 -66 43 eS6V43 08/30/88 480.00 VERSATILE VEHICLE LEASE LINE e7 -4e76- 665 -66 46 e56V43 _ 08 /ee /88 1,T06_05 VERSATILE VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS e7-4540- 665 -66 Ion ' 2,936.05 * 13G 1 - -4fl 30 'D rrrrrr rrr -CKS I61 eS6V54 08/30/88 e91.06 VIKING FOREST PROD. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 643 -64 95914 ;54 - - -- -- - - - -- - ---- ` - -- -- - -- - PROB. - -- - _ 16 es6v e91 .06 VIKING FOREST PROD. PHOTO Supplies 7B ,7" !!!9ev!9q 0 S2!l 0 ;0 ^ 91 -ei2 VIKING FOREST PROD. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10859643 =64-- 944+4- 291.06 s 6, e2 v `'r •r1 /rt ***-Cgs 164 P-56VTS 08/30/88 e1.00 VITO -LEANN CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10-4e4a- 440 -44 1183 °e e56V75 09/0e/88 65_.00 _ VITO -LE ANN CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10-4e48- 440 -44 1184 e2 86.00 s e� 'c 20 v, rrrrr• 000-CKS 72 J e56WOS oe/e3/ee 16.30 W.W. GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- seo -se 7e s� i d.. WI 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 09 -1E -88 PAGE 36 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE REPAIR PARTS -__ REPAIR._PARTS_ __ REPAIR PARTS TOOLS CONTRACTED REPAIRS TOOLS TOOLS ESGW11 09 /02 /8S 574.17 W. GORDON SMITH GASOLINE 256"11 08/22/88 499.06 W. GORDON SMITH GASOLINE f 1,073..23 * 117 *r * * ** Vi 10- 4540 - 520 -52 10-4540 - 540 -54 10- 4580 - 801 -80 E6- 4248- 70E -70 298975 - 40- 4580 - 601 -80 40- 4580 - 601 -80 ET -4616- 664 -66 1874 5636 27-4612- 664 -66 1849 I' jIII1 a ` s to i 1 � 113 4 * * * -CKa "I4 * ** -CKS I. CHECK_NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR MCMT- 8AVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 2561108 081'22/88 1,391.61 W.W. GRAINGER E56WE5 3' 256"08 08/22/88 .. _ _._ .345.07.-­­-- -- _W.W-GRAINGER___. RUBBISH REMOVAL f0 -4250- 440 -44 256"08 08/22/88 176.34 W.W. GRAINGER 256WP5 _ E36W06 OS/E3/88 96.00 M.M. GRAINGER 10- 4250 - 580 -52 256WOS 09/06/68 _ -_ -_ 470.36____W.W. GRAINGER___ 256"25 08/22/88 08/22/88 255.63 W.W. 6RAIN6ER (2.256W08 :E56W08 08/23/88 57.21 W.W. GRAINGER 256W25 08/22/88 52.82 WASTE MCMT- SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL I• 73 3O fr� =•G * *** ** I,7I 256 "25 09 -1E -88 PAGE 36 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE REPAIR PARTS -__ REPAIR._PARTS_ __ REPAIR PARTS TOOLS CONTRACTED REPAIRS TOOLS TOOLS ESGW11 09 /02 /8S 574.17 W. GORDON SMITH GASOLINE 256"11 08/22/88 499.06 W. GORDON SMITH GASOLINE f 1,073..23 * 117 *r * * ** Vi 10- 4540 - 520 -52 10-4540 - 540 -54 10- 4580 - 801 -80 E6- 4248- 70E -70 298975 - 40- 4580 - 601 -80 40- 4580 - 601 -80 ET -4616- 664 -66 1874 5636 27-4612- 664 -66 1849 I' jIII1 a ` s to i 1 � 113 4 * * * -CKa "I4 * ** -CKS I. 256W25 08/22/88 316.95 WASTE MCMT- 8AVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 10- 4280 - 301 -30 _ 23I t, E56WE5 08/22/88 52.79 WASTE MCMT- SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL f0 -4250- 440 -44 G S * ** -CKS P5t c7 128. 256WP5 _ 08/P2/68 _ _ _ 418.51 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 10- 4250 - 580 -52 WILLIAMS STEEL GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 3011 -30 132587 _ - -- 'Sv : 2 256"25 08/22/88 _ 316.95 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 10 -4250- 540 54 - -- = — _I?'I �`~- {I Fv 3 256W25 08/22/88 52.82 WASTE MCMT- SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 10 -4250- 645 -64 73 3O fr� =•G * *** ** I,7I 256 "25 08/22/88 211.30 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 10 -4250- 645 -64 �', E 256W25 256W25 08/22/88 08/22/88 31.28 109.24 WASTE WASTE MGM T - SAVAGE MCMT - SAVAGE NUBBISH- REMOVAC-------723--�4250 RUBBISH REMOVAL =61 -2- 61 26- 4250- 682 -68 133 J4 ' 256WP5 08/22/88 211.27 WASTE MGMT -SAVAGE__________ RUBBISH_ REMOVAL 27- 4250- 662 -66 3a E56WE3 08 /EE /8B 52.79 WASTE MGMT - SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 27 -4250- 664 -66 37I c'• E36WE3 08 /2P /8S 156.60 WASTE MGMT - SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL E8 -4250- 702 -70 30, " E56WE5 _ 08/PE/88 158.60 WASTE MCMT - SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 30- 4250- 782 -78 ��„ = ,E56WE5 E56WE5 08 /EE /88 08/P2/88 E80.60 E80.60 WASTE WASTE MGMT =SAVAGE MGMT- SAVAGE _ RUBBISH REMOVA��d= RUBBISH REMOVAL 425�8A1 =84 50-4250- 861 -86 P40 i41 42 2,652.30 -._. - - - -- - '44 -fan% �' --I • ** *** * **-CKS X47 256WE9 09%2 %88 EATER- PRifdDi`. EPAZR -PART - 0�- 03= 8Y- U735T3 -6789 4 2 57.56— IA 37.50 s 50� _ 5z 54 55� `,.256W41 09/06/88 156.90 WEST PHOTO PHOTO SUPPLIES 10 -4508- 420 -42 09515 175 _. 156.90 s d7 nal 'i 15° *** -CKS 'e0 (.rqe56W55 08/26/68 86.15 WHITE OAK GALLERY OFFICE SUPPLIES 30 -4S16- 781 -78 °2 _ 86.15 * °J Gal 1✓ 41 "' * * * * ** G S * ** -CKS P5t c7 so 52�256W66 08/22/88 65.74 WILLIAMS STEEL GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 3011 -30 132587 _ - -- 'Sv C, 3 je56W66 08/22/88 71.35 WILLIAMS STEEL GENERAL SUPPLY 10 -4504- 560 -56 133772 J0 f' -- 137.09 s 711 72I 73 fr� =•G * *** ** I,7I ** *-CKS J4� 5 7 1986 Cl' EDINA I CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT ie L' I' �1 a I`- � C I3- 1-3- I' CHECK RE :R VFNAAR TTFN AFQCOTOTTAN 09 -12 -68 37 ArnnIINT NA TNV • 0 A Y NCQQACF 1 i 2 2 _08/22/88_ i i3OS W WM H ZIEGLER CO INC R REPAIR PARTS 1 10- 4540 - 560 -56 19230 6552 3 2 4 4 4.05 r 5 e e ° r rryr *r r rr• -CKS e e 7 9 9 ° E E56W88 — 08/ @E/88 - 8.00 W WOHLRABE -SUSAN M MEETING EXPENSE 1 10 -4206- 140 -14 ° _ — 0 -- 8 '2 10 1 rrrrr• *00-CKS 1 13 13'256X05 0 08/26/88 7 72.60 X XEROX CORP. P PRINTING 1 10- 4600- 510 -51 1 17 14 7 _ —_ 2 72.60 • 1 1e '6 r rrrrrr 0 000—CKS 2 21 f0 2 256Z05 0 08/30/88 7 7_6.00 Z ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE G GENERAL SUPPLIES 2 28- 4504 - 702 -70 478684 2 23 24 19;— T T6.00 • 2 25 2' r rst�r� _ _ r rss-CKS 2 2e 22 4 413,408.81 , , 23 2 2,558.07 F FUND 23 TOTAL A ART CENTER 24 1 13,262.23 1 13,3e9.2-3 F FUND BS T 6 6flrPlTrr''6 — r°-'UNB 3 31 V3� 3 3,988.15 F FUND E6 TOTAL S SWIMMING POOL FUND 3 3 26 E E5,991.77 F FUND 27 TOTAL G GOLF COURSE FUND 27 2 2Q,851.0E F FUND E8 TOTAL R RECREATION CENTER FUND 3 3s 28 8 876.70 F FUND 29 TOTAL G GUN RANGE FUND 3 3