The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1988-11-21_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 21, 1988 7:00 P.M. - ROLLCALL I. AWARD OF BID - PARKING FACILITY ADDITION NORTHEAST STAIR TOWER (51St STREET RAMP) II. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. All agenda items listed with an asterisk ( *) _and in bold print are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Council Member or citizen so-requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. ..Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Preliminary Rezoning Approval - R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District to R -1 " Single Dwelling Unit District _ Lots 1, 2 and 3, Indian Hills 3rd Addition - Generally located south of McCauley Trail West and west of Gleason Road B. Preliminary Plat Approval - Irwin First Addition - Lot 2, Block 1, Charles and Ilene Wright Addition - Generally located east of Valley View Road and west of Moccasin Valley Road C. Final Plat Approval 1. Pinewood - Generally located southeast of Vernon Avenue and west of Sherwood Avenue 2. Hed Addition - Lot 1, Block 10, Indian Hills D. Deed Restrictions - 5200 Willson Road, Tract B, R.L.S. No. 1501 ICI. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS IV. AWARD OF BIDS * A. Braemar Golf Course - * B. Park Shelter Buildings (Continue to 12/05/88) V. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS Executive Course Clubhouse - Reconstruct Restrooms to Handicap Accessibility A. Approval of Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of 11/15/88 B. Economic Development District - Southdale Area C. Benefits Study D. Liquor Report Agenda Edina City Council - 11/21/88 Page Two VI. PUBLIC HEARING - TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP OF GRANTEE - CABLE FRANCHISE A. Resolution Approving Extension of Time for Execution of Transfer Documents B. Resolution Approving Joint Public Hearing Before SWSCC on Proposed Transfer of Ownership Relating to Cable Communications Franchise C. Resolution Approving Recommendations of Southwest Institutional Network Group (SWING) D. Settlement with Rogers Cablesystems (Stipulation and Release) 1. Resolution Approving Settlement With Grantee Under City's Cable Franchise Ordinance Regarding Extension of Term of CATV Relief Ordinance to Proposed Transferee of Franchise 2. Amendment to CATV Relief Ordinance No. 1121 VII. RESOLUTIONS. Favorable rollcall vote by majority of quorum to pass. A. Resolution Opposing State Funding of Minneapolis and St. Paul Combined Sewer B. 1989 Laboratory Services Contract - Hennepin County VIII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS. A. Letter - Mary C. Layer re Overnight Parking in Public Ramp IX. FINANCE A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 11/21/88: General Fund $329,452.96, Art Center $3,620.04, Capital Fund $12,434.50, Swimming Poo. Fund $118.84, Golf Course Fund $12,278.08, Recreation Center Fund $143,118.26, Gun Range Fund $369.01, Edinborough Park $9,573.86, Utility Fund $9,376.69, Liquor Dispensary Fund $77,096.52, Construction Fund $59,690.43, Total $657,129.19; and for confirmation of payment of the following Claims dated 10/31/88: General Fund $12,072,714.80, Art Center $957.70, Swimming Pool Fund $3,231.71, Golf Course Fund $13,360.44, Recreation Center Fund $7,782.19, Gun Range Fund $444.32, Edinborough.Park $11,030.22, Utility Fund $43,452.77, Liquor Dispensary Fund $238,372.45, Total $12,391,346.60 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Mon Dec 5 Regular Council Meeting Mon Dec 12 EDINA CENTENNIAL FOUNDERS' DAY Tues Dec 13 Joint Council /Park Board Meeting Mon Dec 19 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room City Hall 8 :00 p.m. Council Room 7:00 p.m. Council Room w9t��1� °k REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: HRA FROM: GORDON HUGHES VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: NOVEMBER 21, 1988 AGENDA ITEM HRA I. ITEM DESCRIPTION: ENCLOSED STAIR TOWER - 51st Street Ramp Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. PENNER DEVELOPMENT 1. $ 99,095 2. SHEEHY CONSTRUCTION 2. $105,000 3. VOLKMAN CONSTRUCTION 3. $113,990 4. PALANI CONSTRUCTION 4. $130,000 5. ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE 5. $ 99,950 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR END: PENNER DEVELOPMENT GENERAL INFORMATION: The HRA awarded a contract last June for the expansion of.the 51st Street Ramp. At that time, the HRA elected to accept an alternate bid to delete face brick from the ramp. Due to the complexity of the alternate bids, staff suggested, and the HRA agreed, to delete the northeast stair toweriwith the understanding that it would be re -bid later. We have redesigned the stair tower by adding more windows for security purposes in accordance with the wishes of the 50th & France Business Association. Signat e The Recommended bid is within budget not Kenneth OPA .0rrer_f tv Department d. City Manager 4,91N�1r� o e- Nov of �0 ch •' HPOMi�O� loss REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: - Kenneth Rosland From: Craig Larsen Date: November 21, 1988 Subject: Z -88 -7, Rezoning from R -2 to R -1 for Lots 1, 2 and 3, Indian Hills 3rd Addition Recommendation: Agenda Item # II. A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion The Planning Commission recommends approval of the proposed rezoning. Info /Background: The proposed rezoning will allow the construction of single family homes on the three lots. The lots are the most easterly lots fronting on McCauley Trail and are adjacent to the single family homes in the Timbers. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 1988 AT 7:30 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman, William Lewis; John Bailey; Helen McClelland; Del Johnson, Gordon Johnson, John Palmer, Jane Paulus, Geoff Workinger MEMBERS ABSENT: David Runyan, Virginia Shaw and Lee Johnson STAFF PRESENT: Craig Larsen, City Planner Jackie Hoogenakker, Secretary I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Commissioner D. Johnson moved for approval of the September 28, 1988 Community Development and Planning Commission Minutes. Commissioner Workinger seconded the motion. All voted aye. Notion carried. II. NEW BUSINESS: Z -88 -7 R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District to R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District. Lots 1, 2 and 3, Indian Hills 3rd Addition. Indian Hills Company Mr. Larsen presented the staff report noting the proponents have submitted a petition to rezone the three vacant lots from R -2 back to R -1 single family. The lots range in size from approximately 24,000 square feet to 40,000 square feet in area. Each lot is approximately 110 feet in width. Substantial portions of the rear yard of each lot is covered by an easement for storm water ponding. The lots all exceed Zoning Ordinance requirements for single family lots. Staff recommends approval of the rezoning for the following reasons: 1. The lots exceed all Zoning Ordinance requirements for R -1 lots. 2. The lots adjoin the Timbers which is all single family. 3., The Comprehensive Plan allows for the mixing of single family and double bungalow uses in areas designated as "low density attached" residential on the land use plan. The proponent, Mr. Gustafson was present. Commissioner G. Johnson asked Mr. Gustafson to explain his reasoning for "down zoning" the lots from R -2 to R -1. Mr. Gustafson explained in the area along McCauley Trail and on the other side of the crosstown highway there has been developed over the past few years an over abundance of double bungalows. He added his company constructed four doubles along McCauley, two are sold, and two are being rented. Continuing Mr. Gustafson said as a developer it is not advantageous to become landlords. He pointed out this plat is adjacent to the single family homes in the Timbers plat. He asked the Commission to note the curve of McCauley Trail where these lots are located afford them more privacy i from crosstown highway. The over sized boulevards also place the proposed house site farther back from McCauley Trail. He added this large boulevard area gives each lot the option of having turn arounds in the front yard so vehicles can enter McCauley Trail front first. Mr. Gustafson indicated property values increase when the neighborhood is completely developed and a more stable neighborhood in gained as a result of homesteaded property versus rental property. He informed the Commission he believes he has one lot sold if it can be developed as single family. He added the price range of the homes will be in the high 200's to 300's. Commissioner McClelland moved to recommend preliminary rezoning approval subject to the conditions noted by staff and the additional recommendation that all sites be developed with front turn arounds thus allowing vehicles to enter McCauley Trail front first. Commissioner Palmer seconded the motion. All voted aye. Motion carried. LOCATION MAP NUMBER . Z -88-7 L 0 C A T10 N Lots 1,2, and 39 Indian Hills 3rd Addition REQUEST Rezone from R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District to R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT NOVEMBER 2, 1988 Z -88 -7 R -2 Double Dwelling-Unit District to R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District. Lots 1, 2 and 3, Indian Hills 3rd Addition. Indian Hills Company The subject property comprises three, vacant double bungalow lots. The lots front on McCauley Trail and are the most easterly three lots in the Indian Hills 3rd Addition plat. Lots 1 through 7 of Indian Hills 3rd are R -2 lots and lots 8 through 16 are R -1 lots. There are existing doubles on lots 4 through 7. The proponents have submitted a petition to rezone the three vacant lots from R -2 back to R -1 single family. The lots range in size from approximately 24,000 square feet to 40,000 square feet in area. Each lot is approximately 110 feet in width. Substantial portions of the rear yard of each lot is covered by an easement for storm water ponding. The lots all exceed Zoning Ordinance requirements for single family lots. Properties to the immediate east and south of the subject lots are developed single family lots in the Timbers Addition. As you travel west, and then south along McCauley Trail there are a mixture of R -1 and R -2 properties. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the rezoning for the following reasons: 1. The lots exceed all Zoning Ordinance requirements for R -1 lots. 2. The lots adjoin the Timbers which is all single family. 3. The Comprehensive Plan allows for the mixing of single family and double bungalow uses in areas designated as "low density attached" residential on the land use plan. INDIAN HILLS 3RD ADD I-a-ooN 41c U o N c.. 0 OU-TLO*T A 0 45-7/ S4 V6 P, 3 4 ov 0 8 3 ll� 0 3 41. boo > 0 10 v 0 07 3 IV 16 C IrA 116, Z" nl 01 12 Q v 0, 0 Aim,' oln i i [} /'/ T LOT 14 1; c 7, it- 4 27CD.. e. IA M•y1 °y '41 -st ..d L ZD.i 4. Z- 0 00 RON KRUEGER AND ASSOCIATES LAND SURVEYORS AND ENGINEERS DRAINAGE ANi:;p U7/CITY EASEME,,�7-5 ARE Z/qopVAj Ty ' Oa/'V'$ 50 FEET hV WID-rAl, -,Ve 6:56 IA'01'=A7---,D AAl0All-rt,1A11AC, AND 407* I-IAJES. AA10 lo. O FEET IAI W/07W RI<SAIT_ a_ w AS Aye 6dwowAl ov THE -/-A 0 'oo zoo SCALE IN �'E2�T • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT c ARINGS SHOWN ON AN ASSUMED BASIS � 9ZriA. .. •'N�RPOM��O/ IBBB REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: _ Kenneth Rosland From: Craig Larsen Date: November 21, 1988 Subject: S- 88 -12, Preliminary Plat approval for Irwin First Addition Recommendation: Agenda Item # II. B. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion The Planning Commission recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat. Info /Background: This proposal would remove the existing dwelling, subdivide the property and create 1 new lot. The new lot exceeds all ordinance requirements. S -88 -12 Preliminary Plat Approval Irwin First Addition Lot 2, Block 1, Charles and Ilene Wright Addition Mr. Larsen presented the staff report noting the subject property is a developed single family lot containing an area of approximately 27,053 square feet. The existing home is located in the central portion of the site and there is a detached garage in the extreme north end of the property. Lot areas would be 13,700 and 13,353 feet, respectively. Both lots would exceed zoning ordinance requirements for single family lots. The proposed lots are similar in size to adjacent lots fronting on Valley View Road. The new lots do not seem to negatively impact the character of this section of Valley View Road. Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat subject to: 1. Final Plat Approval. 2. Subdivision Dedication. 3. Utility Connection Charges. The proponent, Mr. Irwin was present. Commissioner Workinger asked Mr. Larsen if the City received any calls from neighbors regarding this subdivision request. Mr. Larsen responded that the City has received phone calls from neighbors. The callers requested additional information on the subdivision but did not express their opinions on either favoring or opposing it. Commissioner G. Johnson noted on the west side of Valley View Road the topography is very hilly and the lots are predominately larger than the lots on the east side of Valley View Road. He asked Mr. Larsen if there has been any inquiries to subdivide lots on the west side of Valley View Road. Mr. Larsen said the City has received a number of inquiries to subdivide lots in this area. He reiterated Commissioner G. Johnson's point that the terrain in this area is hilly and if a subdivision would be proposed it would certainly have to be carefully considered. Commissioner McClelland explained that she is opposed to this subdivision. She added she does not see the need to subdivide this property. Commissioner McClelland said larger lots in Edina are becoming victims of a chopping pattern. This pattern should be discouraged. Commissioner Bailey pointed out the proposed subdivision compares with the development off Moccasin Valley Road and the development directly situated behind the proposed development. Commissioner McClelland stated in her opinion this subdivision does not make good planning sense and the proposed division "crowds" the site. Commissioner Palmer said he understands Commissioner McClelland's concern regarding the "chopping" of plated lots within the City but noted subdivision in an almost completely developed community can tend to become a question of where you draw the line. That can become difficult because each subdivision requested must be looked at individually and our standards must be applied. On the east side of .Valley View Road subdivisions have occurred. Commissioner G. Johnson pointed out at one time the lot in question was one large lot which was subdivided into three lots in the 1970's. Mr. Jeff Gustafson told the Commission he believes the proposed subdivision will improve the neighborhood. He pointed out other approved subdivisions in the area and added Mr. Irwin has a good track record with the City of Edina. Mr. Gustafson added if this project is properly controlled by City Staff it should be a good project. Mr. Irwin informed the Commission he will relocate a majority of trees on the site while retaining as much of the character of the property as possible. He added the proposed division is compatible with the previous subdivision of this property. Commissioner McClelland, Commissioner Paulus, and Commissioner Workinger were in agreement that the previous subdivision of this property was enough and does not necessarily mean continued subdivision is inevitable. The expressed their opposition to the proposal. Commissioners Palmer, G. Johnson, D. Johnson, W. Lewis and J. Bailey expressed the opinion that a precedent has been established for subdivision on the east side of Valley View Road. They noted this request is similar to earlier subdivisions within the area. Commissioner D. Johnson suggested that the Commission may want to look into increasing the minimum lot requirements for the City. This would "tighten up" questionable areas. Commissioner Bailey moved to recommend preliminary plat approval subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Palmer seconded the motion. Upon roll call vote: Bailey, aye; D. Johnson, aye; McClelland, nay; C. Johnson, aye; Palmer, aye; Paulus, nay; Workinger, nay; Lewis, aye. Notion carried 5 -3. III. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 8:45 p.m. Jaculin Hoogenakker, Secretary J. LOCATION MAP I A' PAW 0 W" 0C SUBDIVISION NUMBER LOCATION REQUEST EDINA 0 111 '- "Si%40 S-88-12 Lot 2, Block 1, Charles and Ilene Wright Addition Create one additional lot. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1 i1 ' I EDINA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT NOVEMBER 2, 1988 S -88 -12 Preliminary Plat Approval Irwin First Addition Lot 2, Block 1, Charles and Ilene Wright Addition The subject property is a developed single family lot containing an area of approximately 27,053 square feet. The existing home is located in the central portion of the site and there is a detached garage in the extreme north end of the property. The proposed preliminary plat would subdivide the property and create one, new buildable lot. The proponent anticipates removing the existing structures. Each new lot would be 95 feet wide and approximately 140 feet deep. Lot areas would be 13,700 and 13,353 feet, respectively. Both lots would exceed zoning ordinance requirements for single family lots. Lot sizes and shapes vary significantly in this area. For comparison, the proponents surveyor has supplied lot sizes for lots in the immediate vicinity. Most of the surveyed lots are larger than those in the proposed preliminary plat. However, the proposed lots do compare favorably to nearby lots in the terms of lot width. In addition to the subject property only four houses front on this section of Valley View. The lot to the north is larger, but it is a corner lot. The proposed lot widths are similar to the widths of the 3 lots to the south. Recommendation The proposed lots are similar in size to adjacent lots fronting on Valley View Road. The new lots do not seem to negatively impact the character of this section of Valley View Road. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat subject to: 1. Final Plat Approval. 2. Subdivision Dedication. 3. Utility Connection Charges. JOB NO. 881035 IRWIN FIRST ADDITION - - Preliminary Plat / — I LEGAL DESCRIPTION f. I LOT 2. BLOCK 1. CHARLES AND ILENE WRIGHT ADDITION, CITY OF EDINA. HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA AND RESERVING EASEMENTS OF RECORD TRAIT %k. 64 .12420' �.... CAW - >. / 51,4 Hem" ----- - -�,�' ----- - - - - -- ------------- -T---- - - -- -- / I i I r ;?1'sa is il— 4: 111 �'�� / �,arG�e ios— �i \ +�.ra, • n.sce. // s'.oa -• Ic.eso / / - // `l��.11lll 1.111 1 2 i•,' �^ / \ .L__ �. - / // r(•• I. 1\ .I� �,jl'...1 c. - -- �1T1. l i f'`' n,s» :s:a. Wfi( 1:170' 31. V4, - el, 44c / I I at.ot• z5.1so• I I ----- vfv-------- -' - - - --1 \4 - - - -- \`- - - - - -� s� 1a. • 24.+00• \ \ 5n.fi, 17.540' \ / / 31.24 • n,44o' 3 Y 50 0 50 top t5D \ / / SCALE IN FEET SCALE: 1 INCH = 50 FEET / DATE OCTOBER 16, 1988 q \ / REV. :OCTOBER 24, 1988 3i a4.• n,410= • I • \ • i � I heRDy certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duty Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the / State of Minnesota. � r 57.N -• t.E, 110' // ,/.,'...,. T-) / Jeft"O. Linogren, Minn. Rep. No. 14376 PREPARED FOR : WALLY IRWIN 7400 METRO BLVD. SUITE 385 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 PREPARED BY : HEDLUND PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING 9201 EAST BLOOMINGTON FREEWAY BLOOMINGTON , MINNESOTA 55420 PHONE (612) 888 -0289 i ASMUND Punning Engineenng Surveying A. O •'�RPON`ti�v • ,BBB REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland Agenda Item # lz. C. 1. From: Craig Larsen Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: November 21, 1988 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: s -88 -5, Final Plat 0 To Council Approval for Pinewood Addition Action ❑Motion El Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Final Plat Approval subject to subdivision dedication based on a value of $40,000.00. Info /Background: The City Council granted Preliminary Plat approval June 20, 1988. The con- ditions imposed at preliminary plat have been satisfied and the proponent is requesting final approval. Subdivision No. -5-69--s- SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT TO: Planning Commission Park Board Environmental Quality Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBDIVISION NAME: j �} -woo d ,P LAND SIZE: N �LJLJ , O l LAND VALUE: (BY: , Date: The developer of this subdivision has been required to A. grant an easement over part of the land B. dedicate % of the land C. donate $ as a fee in lieu of land As a result of applying the following policy: A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 5% of land dedicated) 1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition beneficially expands the park. II 2. If, property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park. 0 3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream. 4. If property is necessary for storm.water holding or will be dredged or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds. n 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his- toric value. F 6. B. Cash Required 1. In all other instances than'above. i-� 2. C r NUMBER Z -88 -2 and S -88 -2 L O C A TI O N 5338 Sherwood Road and 5333 Vernon Avenue REQUEST Four Lot Subdivision EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT N PINEWOOD JQR DOC. NO. i OC•L[ IM /[[T 0 i0 10 t0 e D— 1— 11...x.1 T. e«rkq. — sn W. pl.t .r. arl.n.tl V nr «.. f el L« 1. a— 1. EDE -00" Dkl.....n ..wr0 p«rMi of N Y M' u• [. / • t - .� a t it CTa _r' r r Yh �gIslr�lr- ^ 01-n° / I� ` Q / a9Je oR 208.6 EDENN00A I =�J l✓ 41 y I,-- S84'S9.2J'�./ 209.02 NE23utfG � \ y� I L'- rf Xt PINEWOOD I TRAIL g �e 1E I X� LC Lt- / (.; `S�;s >, � 1 I g .L I Isern•t�'w 2zssn _ r� �_ L I / / ` ; ! i . __.nap_• t 9-/ 50 0008, r L� I L_ 1J Z; m 1� Il , I ' r_ 1 5 ^YI ® C K C)," rl� �I _\ I LJ (l , _ � / .. r N' C.IP 111 /` /` ` P 11" . 1 1 I II 1, - J g 1 1 L 1 N I 11 1 v �I J I I 1 I d 1 r� rVl 1 —: oi r`/ _ "`� .�.ltr.:7 �1• _ (F.K.A. wILL50N DR.) S�.s 'E L(YAC . = Gfil:. I / g w L«. d • o. e. 1 / pr / OrnEL1 us s r wee. n. . • I 1 L- L. 1 .ue.•miiwa• 3� �, ITV \fib Ja?'39,06�Ew 173.73 � 4 / 3 89'S9 O9'E 223.39 Itr. NOTE[ ar LOT M, d.Of:lt [,[.0w0v0 SLJ II 9 Z, /3.E 60 f {it�iliJ�tJl �L. I"1il_t_ m" 2.0 MTX-. C JNB ;47 _ Drtlwi..ro uallq wsnl. n..ow— t...: � 3 11 p ,` l i �� a 0.1 -1 I r. 1_I 1 1 I I I L iviJ /�LILIi� �: s s ,.rlr r rlr�l-r11�1 /`I r_ I �I L I / L+ L. 11 1_ I, i.ln. I MI M 0100., .ro tllWup YI nn.., Hansen Thorp PeAinen Mw Inc. 1 1 re.w w�.......r,... SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEFM RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR PINEWOOD BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "PINEWOOD ", platted by Pinewood Partners of Edina, a Minnesota general partnership, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of November 21, 1988, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. ADOPTED this 21st day of November, 1988. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 21, 1988 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 22nd day of December, 1988. City Clerk Cn • �NR7RPO"" • lead REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland Agenda Item # II. C. 2. From: Craig Larsen Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: November 21, 1988 Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: S -88 -8, Final Plat M To Council Approval for Hed Addition Action ❑ Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Final Plat approval conditioned on Subdivision Dedication based on a value of $90,000.00 Info /Background: The Council granted Preliminary Plat approval on August 15, 1988. There were no special conditions. The proponents have presented their plat for final approval. Subdivision No.S r g 8 —8 SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT TO: Planning Commission Park Board Environmental Quality Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBDIVISION NAME:EUL LAND SIZE: P�t�J l D7F' LAND VALUE : C. --� (By: rj Date: )" The developer of this subdivision has been required to , 11 A. grant an easement over part of the land ElB. dedicate % of the land C. donate $ as a fee in lieu of land As a result of applying the following policy: A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for -the first 5% of land dedicated) 1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition beneficially expands the park. II 2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park. II3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream. 4. If property is necessary for storm water holding or will be dredged or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds. 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his- toric value. ri 6. B. Cash Required 1. In all other instances than above. 2. r i �l d r-ol LANA PLANNING nl=P HIED ADDITION •yam /vt/�' I !/� / ✓ /:,".,/ /,! /�.'.:J \ - \ ��-= ?A ,Q_ L- =o �F S B7'.Y6ry6 i� R. 36/.Bb, S4,�.�' \ •'tt_ � 49 NI tb/ / r Inn, NBB � /eB'W e� uj 8 ARLSON INC. ARLSON. .a.e wns.o.t • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT. BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED ON AN UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS SHOWN THUS ASSUMED BASIS. � IS 5I 1- -- \� SCALE IN FEET 9 - I� y NOT TO SCALE O 25 50 100 150 BEING S FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING LOT LINES AND 10 FEET IN WIDTH ADJOINING STREET LINES AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. • C.R. DOC. NO. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Vlrgll C. Ned and Sharon D. Had, his wife, owners and proprietors of the following described property Situated In the County Of Hennepin and State of Minnesota to wit: Lot 1, Block 10, Indian Hills, according to the retarded plot thereof on file and of record In the office of the Hennepin County Recorder• Harecaused the Same to be surveyed and platted as NED ADDITION and do hereby donate and dedicate to the public for public use forever the Easements for utility and drainage Purposes as shown on the plat. In witness whereof said Virgil C. Had and Sharon D. tied, nis wl fe, heve hereunto set their hands and seals this day pf tg9 SIGNED: Virgii L. hea aron u. Red STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing Instrument •as acknowledged before we this day of 191_ by Virgil C. Had and Sharon D. Hed, his wife. ptary uO c• n,, In ounty. Minnesota My C_isslon expires 1 hereby certify that 1 nave surveyed and platted the property described on this plat as RED ADDITION, that this plot is a true no correct reoresentatlon of said survey: that all distances are correctly shown on the Diet in feet end hundredths of a foot; that all exmulMnts nave [Men correctly Dleced In tne ground es shown ; that the outside boundary lines are correctly designated On this Dlat; and that there are IM public high.,ys or wet lands to be des ignited on this plot. Larry outure, an urveyor Minnesote License No. 9018 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before he this _ day of 190 by Larry R. Couture, Lend Surveyor. otary Public, Hennepin-County, Minnesota my Conalsslon expires CITY OF EDINA, Minnesote This 'let of NED ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Edine. Minnesota, at a regular meting thereof held this day of , 198 . If applicable the written com entf and recormendatlons of the Is ss-1 —N—r oflransbortatson an t ounty sg way Cngamer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without rKei Dt o! auto torments or rKOmmandatlons. as provided by Minnesote Statutes, Section 505.03, Subdivision t. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA by by Yor -- pager PROPERTY TAY AND PUBLIC RECORDS DEPARTMENT, Hennepin County, Minnesota 1 hereby certify that taxes payable In and prior years have been paid for lands described on this plat. Dated this day of 198 . Dale G. Foisted, Hennepin County Auditor by Deputy SURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, Minnesota Pursuant to Chapter 810, NJ —Soto Laws of 1969, this plot has been approved this day of - , 198 Bernard N. Larson, Hennepin County Surveyor by COUNTY RECORDER, Hennepin County, Minnesota 1 hereby certify that the within plat Of HED ADDITION was filed In this office this day of 198 at o'clock _.M. R. Den Carlson, County Recorder by Deputy RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR HED ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "HED ADDITION ", platted by Virgil C. Hed and Sharon D. Hed, his wife, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of November 21, 1988 be and is hereby granted final plat approval. ADOPTED this 21st day of November, 1988. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY-OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and forgoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 21, 1988 and as recorded in the Minutes of-said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 15th day of December, 1988. City Clerk l't o e Cn 'C. 4 O itlee REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: _ Kenneth Rosland From: Craig Larsen Date: November 21, 1988 Subject: Deed Restrictions, 5200 Willson Road, ;Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1501. Recommendation: Leave Deed Restrictions in place. :Info /Background: Agenda Item # U D. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA El To Council Action [] Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion The attached deed restrictions were imposed on the property in 1979. The key The of the restrictions are: 1. Limit the property to only one building. 2. Limit total square footage to 52,517 square feet. 3. No medical or dental offices allowed. The new owners of the property would like to construct a new office building on the site containing approximately 10,000 square feet of floor area. If constructed as proposed total building square footage would increase to approximately 57,000 square feet. Attached to this report are City Council minutes from hearings on the initial development of this property. The then owner of the property entered into the deed restrictions to allay concerns of the Council and nearby residents concerning the proposed office use, the size and height of the building, and the traffic generated by the use. In addition to lifting the deed restrictions, the proposed development would require variances for parking quantity and parking setbacks. The parking quantity variance would be substantial. A proof of parking agreement would be impractical since there would not be space available to develop additional parking. RUM, Cabriole Center 9531 West 78th Street Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 612 941 1792 THE LEXINGTON COMPANY Lexington /Edina Executive Plaza November 16, 1988 City Council of the City of Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Re: Edina Executive Plaza Ladies and Gentlemen: I am writing this letter as a partner of The Lexington Company, owner of Edina Executive Plaza located'at 5200 Willson Road. My company has recently undertaken one -story 10,000 square foot offic Edina Executive Plaza is located. submission for the approval of the discovered that a dead restriction precluding the construction of the plans to construct an additional e building on the parcel on which In the course of preparing our Edina Planning Commission, it was exists, dating back to 1978, new building. The dead restriction can be released by action of,the Edina City Council. The purpose of this letter is to request that, at your November 21, 1988 meeting, you pass a resolution releasing the dead restriction so that The Lexington Company can proceed with its submission to obtain the necessary approvals for the construction of the new building. I would be happy to answer any questions you may have. Please feel free to call me at 941 -1792. In addition, I plan to be at your November 21, 1988 meeting. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, THE LEXINGTON COMPANY Plul . 8 V Joseph H. Ryan I 1 �I'PLICATE �. DI ?CLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS AND PROTLCTIVL COVENANTS THIS DECLARATION OF RL'STRICTIONS AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS, made this 19th day of September, 1979, by Alpha Enterprises, a South Dakota general partnership (hereinafter referred to as "Owner"). WITNESSETH THAT; WHEREAS, Owner is the owner of certain real estate situated in the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1501, files of the Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota (hereinafter called the "Subject Property "); and WHEREAS, Owner desires to provide for the proper and orderly development and improvement of the Subject Property pursuant to the requirements of the City of Edina. NOW, THEREFORE, Owner does hereby impose of the Subject Property, and each and every part thereof, the following restrictions and covenants, which shall operate as equitable restrictions and ,covenants passing with the title to each and every part of the subject property, and shall apply to and bind each and every present and future owner, occupier, and encumbrancer thereof, to -wit: 1. That only one (1) building or structure shall ever be constructed or placed at one tune on the Subject Property. 2. That any building or structure hereafter constructed or placed on the Subject Property shall not exceed four stories as defined by the applicable ordinances of the City of Edina. 3. That the cellar, as defined by the applicable ordinances of the City of Edina, of any building or structure hereafter constructed or placed on the Subject Property shall be used for storage and will not be an active floor area. . 4. That any building or structure hereafter constructed or placed on the Subject Property shall not exceed a total gross floor area of Fifty -two Thousand, Five Hundred Seventeen (52,517) square feet, as measured from the exterior of the exterior walls of the building or str�_'cture, and including, without limitation, al! vents, vent shafts, courts, elevator shafts, and stairwPiic .. . _ - ---... b v6 structure. If any floor, story, or portion of any such building or structure is not provided with surrounding exterior walls (excluding, however, the roof and main entrance way thereof), then for purposes hereof, the number of square feet within such floor, story, or portion, and to be included within the total maximum gross floor area above set out shall be the area, measured as provided in the immediately i 1 preceding; sentence, within the vertical projection of the exterior walls of the portion of such building or structure immediately above or below such floor, story or portion. The total amount of net leaseable floor area shall not exceed Forty Thousand (40,000) square feet. Calculations used to determine the total gross floor area and the amount of net leaseable floor area shall be based upon architechural drawings by Rambo Logan Associates, Incorporated, dated July 20, 1979 on file with the City of Edina. No remodeling, reconstruction or renovation of any structure or building on the subject property shall increase the amount of allowable total gross floor area or net leaseable floor area as set forth above. If the City and the then owner or owners of the Subject Property cannot agree on the total gross or net leaseable floor area of any building or structure hereafter constructed or placed on the Subject Property, the determination of the City, made pursuant to this Paragraph 4, and based upon such. architectural drawings, shall. control and be binding upon such owner or owners. 5. That no part of the Subject Property, and no part of any building or structure now or hereafter located on all or any part thereof, shall be used as and for an office or offices for medical doctors or doctors of dental surgery. 6. Each and every part of the Subject Property shall be subject to all applicable statutes and ordinances now or hereafter enacted or existing, and such statutes and ordinances shall be effective as to the Subject Property even though more restrictive than or in addition to the restrictions and covenants herein contained. 7. The restrictions and covenants herein contained may be released only by the City of Edina, and may be released as to all or any part of the Subject Property and as to any building or structure now or herafter located thereon, by the sole act of the City of Edina. Any such release shall be effective only upon the recording of a resolution of the Edina City Council so releasing the restrictions and covenants in the same office in which this instrument has been recorded. 8. If any provision of this instrument is for any reason held. to be invalid or unenforceable as to all or any part of the Subject Property, or as to all or any part of any building or structure now or hereafter located thereon, or as to any person or circumstance, the application of such provision to the other portions of the Subject Property, or other buildings or improvements, or portions of any thereof, or to other persons or circumstances, other than to those to which it shall be held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby, and all provisions of this instrument in all other respects shall reinain in full force and effect and be valid and enforceable. 2 J� 9. It any person shall violate or attempt to violate any of the restrictions and covenants herein contained, it shall lie lawful for any person owning any of the Subject Property, or any interests therein, or the City of Edina, to prosecute any proceedings at law or in equity against the person or persons violating or attempting to violate any .such restriction or covenant, and either to provent such violation or to recover damages therefor. The person or persons violating or attempting to violate any of the restrictions and covenants herein contained shall. also be liable (jointly and severally, if more than one), for all costs, including attorneys' fees, incurred by any person, including the City of Edina, in enforcing these restrictions and covenants and whether suit be brought or not, and with interest on all such costs at eight per cent (8,').per annum from the date incurred until paid, and shall also be liable for all costs of collection of such costs, with interest, again. including attorneys' fees and whether suit be brought or not, with interest at eight per cent (8 %) per annum on such costs of collection from the dates incurred until paid. ALPHA ,7 .T fZPR1SES �B Howard S. Cox, A Trustee State of Minnesota ) S5. County of Hennepin ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 19th day of Septembe.r,1979, by Howard S. Cox, a Trustee of Omega Trust, a general partner of Alpha Enterprises, a South Dakota general partnership. THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: WIESE AND COX, LTD. 2022 IDS Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 and DORSEY? WINDHORST, HANNAFORD, WHITNEY do H4LLADAY (TSC) 2300 First National Bank Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 3 No a y 'ublic Y. AAWAAAAAAAAWAAA.AAAWAr e A A AAAAA ROBERT J. LUKES NOTARY PUBLIC • P.1 P:NESOTA HENNEPiN COUNTY ri Mly rommission Errirc; Jan. 20. 1983 p> XyyyyVNTy1yVVV.TVrV If If 1 4— y 9/18/78 265 KERR COMPANIES REZONING REQUEST CONTINUED TO OCTOBER _2, 1978. Affidavits of Notice �1 were presented by Clerk, approved as to forty and ordered placed on file. Mr. Hughes presented the petition of the Kerr Companies for re.,,�oning of property located at Willson Road and Eden Ave. behind Perkins RestauranL from R -1 Residential District to 0 -2 Office Building District and recalled that, at the City Council Meeting of August 21, 1978, this matter had been referred back to the Community Development and Planning Commission. Ile advised that the matter had been reviewed by that body on September 6, 1978, and approval reaffirmed by a vote of 7 to 3. Mr. Robert Martinson, representing the Kerr Companies introduced Messrs. Norman Kerr and Donald and David Halla, and made a slide presentation of an historic over -view of the site which had been acquired by the Hallas in 1948. Mr. Gustafson referred to the 1975 Hedberg litigation in which it was held by the Court that R -1 zoning was a holding zone in which the use has not been determined. He.presented a map showing commer- cial and office-centers in the City, with special emphasis on the three block area adjacent to the site in question and advised that the property is appropriate for office use because of easy access to T.H. 100, the good view overlooking the golf course, access to good restaurants, because the property is void of trees and because noise from T.H. 100 traffic would not be condusive for other uses. Recall - ing that a previous request for R -5 zoning had been denied by the Council, Mr. Mart inson said that the site would not be acceptable for a medical office building or housing for the elderly, leaving only a small retail center, a market rate apart- ment building or the office building as desirable uses for the property. He added Q that Our Lady of Grace Church had indicated that they would prefer the property to be used for housing for the elderly. Mr. Robert Bell, representing the proponents, U advised that it is anticipated that the office building would generate.980 trips t per day, which would add 120 cars on W. 50th Street and 290 cars on T.H. 100 dur- ing peak traffic hours. (At this point Councilwoman Schmidt left the meeting, saying that she had a possible conflict-of interest.) In response to a question of Councilman Richards, Mr. Greg Gustafson, attorney for the proponents, said that none of the Halla property was taken on the West side for T.H. 100, and clari- fied that the building would be five stories above the parking level. Mr. Hughes advised that it is.anticipated that 80% of the site would be covered with hard surface under the proposed plans. Mr. Hoffman said that drainage would go into the T.H. 100 storm sewer and that, while storm water might be a problem for the site itself, it would not have any impact on surrounding properties. Council was advised that members of the Community Development and'Planning Commission who had voted in *_Favor of the proposed rezoning did so because they believed that it was a difficult site to develop. Those who had voted against the proposal did so because it would set a precedent for land use East of T.H. 100. Mr. Hughes also clarified that a sidewalk could be constructed on the site if it should be needed. Mr. Newell Gaasedelen, 4818 Golf Terrace, spoke in opposition to the proposal, stating that only the North end of the property had been used for commercial pur- poses over the years, with the Southern portion being used for growing nursery stock. He expressed concern that, at some future date, there might be a request for office building zoning for the site of the high school parking lot North of the school and on the East side of the T.H. 100 Service Road, and that even one of the schools might be zoned for office use should they not be needed by the School District. Mr. Gaasedelen also said that an office building would add substan- tially to the responsibilities of the Police Department. Dr. Harry Hall, 4902 Lakeview Drive, also spoke in opposition to the proposed office building. Concern was expressed that traffic generated by an office building would filter thru resi- dential districts to the East of T.H. 100. Stating that they believe that an office building is the best use for the land were Mr. Charles Brown, 6205 Ash- " croft Lane, Dr. J. R. Ault, 4906 Lakeview Drive and the resident who lives at 5600 Sherwood Ave. Mr. Martinson advised Council that it is anticipated that taxes for the proposed office building would be between $125,000 and $140,000, with $77,000 of these taxes remaining in the City. He disagreed that there would be a traffic problem at the intersection of Willson Road and Eden Ave. Councilman Courtney's motion for approval of 0 -2 Office Building District zoning died for lack of a second. In response to a question of Councilman Shaw, Mr. Gustafson said that no consideration had been given to construction of a four story building on the site, rather than the five story building. Councilman Richards then moved that the hear- ing be continued until.October 2, 1978, so that the proponents could explore the economics of a less intensive use of the site. Motion was seconded by Councilman Shaw. Ayes: Courtney, Richards, Shaw, Van Valkenburg Nays: None Motion carried. Councilwoman Schmidt returned to the meeting at this point. COr41ERCIAL ':USE.;OF,,: EASTERLY - PORTION OF TRACT A, =;R:,L S . 13654 APPROVED COND1 ONALLY . P1r:rfiughes presented the,requestofJDayton 'Hudson " Properties for commercial use of the easterly�� portionYof ::Tract " R.L.S. 1365, generally located East of the Junior: „.Achievement Building on .Valley View Road West of France- ,Av.e.,.recalling i M LNUTES OF TIIE RI- :(.UI..AR MEE'CING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HEILD AT CITY HALL DECEMBER 4, 1978 Answering rollcall were members Courtney, Richards,',,,,Sc�.l�idt. Shaw and Van Valken- bur lso ." M'-Attendance �iaere M s s Ray�OhConnelT ;Hi1man t! mission, Arthur"'ic1.c , Art - Center Committee, Charles 13redesen, :.1 II, Il:'R -A :and Dirs. Helen McClelland of the Community Development and::•Planning;Commission. MINUTES of October 16, 1978, =:were approved as presented by motion of Councilwoman Schmidt, seconded by,Cou cilman Courtney. Ayes: CourtneyaRiclia ds, Schmidt, Shaw, Van Valkenburg � � Nays,: 'MNone,5, P 8 KERR COMPANIES 0 -2 OFFICE BUILDING ZONING REQUEST CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 18, 1978. G1 0 1 Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Mr. Hughes recalled that this request for 0 -2 Office Building zoning for property immediately South of the Perkins property on Eden Ave. had been last heard by Council on September 18, 1978, at which time it had been con - tinued so that the proponents could determine a means of reducing the intensity of the use for the site. (Councilwoman Schmidt left the meeting because of a pos- sible conflict of interest.) Mayor Van Valkenburg referred to letters received opposing the zoning request from Mrs. Florence Faegre, 5236 Kellogg Ave., Messrs. Q David W. Crowther, 4604 Tower St., Leslie V. Randall, Jr., 4704 Golf Terrace, Q Dennis R. Hykes, 4516 W. Woodland Road, Robert W. Grill, 4613 W. Woodland Road, e James M. Hall, 5604 St. Andrews Ave., and Mr. and Mrs. Harold G. Williams, 4617 Lexington St., Mr. and Mrs. H. Alan Schlesinger, 4501 Golf Terrace, Mr. and . Mrs. Lloyd I. Vinje, 5608 Dalrymple Rd., the Board of the Edina Country Club and a group of school bus drivers. Mr. Robert Martinson of the Kerr Companies said that the plans which were to be presented to the Council in October had not been economically viable and, for that reason, further continuations had been requested. He reviewed proposals which had been previously made and explained that the pro- ponents are now exploring the financial feasibility of constructing a 40,000 square foot building which would be no higher than six stories, with parking to 1 accommodate 230 automobiles. In response to questions of Councilman Shaw, Mr. Martinson said that it would probably not be feasible to build a structure less than six stories because of soil problems. He added that it is proposed to con- struct the building as far to the North as possible so as to take advantage of better soil conditions. Mr. Martinson emphasized that the proposed building would not require any variances. Objections from the audience were made by Dr. Harry Hall, 4902 Lakeview Drive, Messrs. Donald Nyrop, Edwin C. Moore, Thomas Richards, Newell Gaasedelen and Donald Hey, all of Golf Terrace and Mmes. William Brandow and Frances Guimont, both of Lakeview Drive. In response to questions of Mrs. Pat Senior, 4503 Golf Terrace, Mr. Richard Wolsfeld of Bather, Ringrose, Wolsfeld, Jarvis and Gardner, Inc., explained that results of his analysis shower. that it would not be logical for freeway traffic to use residential streets when collector streets already exist. Mr. Wolsfeld said that only 1,000 trips per day were anticipated with the original 70,000 square foot building and that the 460 trips per day anticipated with the newly proposed 40,000 square foot building would not cause any substantial traffic increase. Mr. Hughes concurred with Mr. Wolsfeld's analysis. Mr. Rubert Rutherford, 4608 Golf Terrace, said that he is a school bus driver and questioned how it is proposed to keep school busses on schedule during peak traffic hours. He contended that the service road is already congested and suggested that additional office space is not needed in the City. It was also suggested that the property could be better used for R -2 Residential development. Mr. Wolsfeld agreed that if the intersection at Eden Ave. and Wilson Road is blocked, people would use Golf Terrace, but emphasized that normal day activity is so small that it would not be noticeable. Mr. Greg-Gustafson, representing the developer said that every effort is being made to be responsive to the residents and to the Council and that the planning staff all feel that an office building is the best use for the site. He requested that Second Reading of the ordinance be waived. Recalling a proposal made several years Ago for R -4 zoning for the site in question, Councilman Richards said that he believes that Office Building zon- ing is the best use for the site, but that Council should see specific plans for the development and also that the building should not exceed four stories in.height. He then moved that the concept of an office building be approved and that the developers bring a new four story, 40,000 square foot net leasable in size design back for Council's consideration, which plans would not require any vari- ances and that the plans would also indicate how much of the property would be used for parking purposes. Motion was seconded by Councilman Courtney. 12/4/78 2 Ayes: Courtney, Richards, Shaw, Van Valkenburg Nays: None Abstaining: Schmidt Motion carried. Interested residents were asked to sign their names on a sheet of paper so that they can be notified when the matter again comes before the Council. In response to Mr. Miirtinson's expression of disappointment as to'the Council's action, Council- man Richards said that the alternative was that he would vote against the zoning request but that he was trying to work something out which would be acceptable to both the developers and to the Council. Councilwoman Schmidt returned to the meet- ing at this point. StTPERAMERICA APPEAL"'F'ROM-BOARD- OF'-APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS DECISION. CONTINiT JANUARY;_15,- -197 -9.= Affidavits -of -- Notice -were presented by Clerk, approved as ,;o form and ordered placed on file. Being advised that Superamerica has requested.:he continuation of its appeal from the Board of Appeals and Adjustments decis on denying its request for a driveway setback from street right -of -way, Cou Gilman Shaw's motion continuing the matter until January 15, 1979, was seconded' y Council- man Courtney. Ayes: Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Shaw, Van Valkenburg Nays: Non e Motion carried. SOUTHDALE OFFICE CENTER APPEAL FROM BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS DECISION WITHDRAWN. Council was advised that the National City Bank fhas withdrawn its appeal from the Board of Appeals and Adjustments decision denying a 458 car park- ing variance and a 10 foot parking setback variance for development at 6600 -6800 France Ave. No formal action was taken. "XII SOUTHWEST, SOUTH AND WESTERN EDINA PLAN AMENDMENT CONTINUED TO MARCH 5, 1979. Councilman Courtney's motion was seconded by Councilman Shaw continuing the South- west, South and Western Edina Plan Amendment to March 5, 1979, which amendment had previously been continued to this meeting from September 18, 1978. Ayes: Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Shaw, Van'Valkenburg Nays: None Motion carried. PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ORDINANCE NO '811-A115 AMENDMENT CONTINUED TO MARCH 5, 1979. Councilman Courtney's motion was seconded by Councilman Shaw continuing the Planned Residential District Ordinance No. 811 -A115 Amendment to March 5, 1979, said ordinance amendment having previously been continued to this meeting from September 18, 1978. Ayes: Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Shaw, Van Valkenburg Nays: None's Motion carried. DEWEY HILL ESTATES GRANTED FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, SUBJECT TO RECEIPT OF OPEN SPACE EASEMENT BY CITY. Mr. Hughes presented Dewey Hill Estates, located on the South- west quadrant of Dewey Hill Road and Cahill Road for final plat, noting that all ordinance requirements had been met. In response to the concern of Councilman Rich- ards that Outlot A might later be developed, Mr. Harold Ness of the Gettleman Corp- oration stated their willingness to grant a scenic and open space easement over Out - lot A to preclude its further development. Councilman Richards thereupon offered the following resolution,'and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR DEWEY HILL ESTATES BE IT.RESOLVED by the�Edina City Council that that certain plat entitled "Dewey Hill Estates ", platted by Melvin C. Gittleman, and presented at the Edina City Council Meeting ofd - December 4, 1978, be and is hereby granted final plat approval, subject to receipt by the City of Edina of a- scenic and -open space easement aver Outlot A. Motiof'for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilman Shaw. Rollcall: Ayes: Cour�ney, Richards, Schmidt, Shaw, Van Valkenburg Nays: _None Resolution adopted. HEARING DATES SET FOR PLANNING MATTERS. As recommended by Mr. Hughes, Councilman Shawls ation was seconded by Councilman Courtney, setting December 18, 1978, as hearing date for the following Planning matters: �__ 1) Baird 11ouse Rezoning from R- 1_District to Heritage Preservation District 2) „.Preliminary - -Plat Approval for Joy's Edina Manor, located at 5236 Richwood Dr. ,►yes :Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Shaw, Van Valkenburg Nays: Nona Motion carried. 46 11 MINUTES OF THE 'REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL DECEMBER 18, 1978 Answering rollcall were members Courtney, Richards, Schm Councilman -elect Bredesen, Mr. Raymond O'Connell representing the Human Relations Commission and Mrs. Helen McClelland representing A§6 Community Development and Planning Commission were present. MINUTES of November 6, 8 and 20, 1978 were.-approved as presented by motion of Councilman Courtney, seconded by Councilman_'Shaw. Ayes: Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Sha_i, Van Valkenburg Nays: None Motion carried.. ROBERT SNYDER, GEORGE BUTLER AND ROGER HOBSON HONORED UPON RETIREMENT. Mayor Van Valkenburg presented plaques to the following retiring employees and commended them for their competent and dedicated service to the City of Edina: Robert R. Snyder as Manage r'of the Edina Liquor Stores from September 28, 1956 to December 29, 1978; George D. Butler as Police Officer and Sergeant from October 11, 1951 to November 30, 1978; and Roger K. Hobson as Manager of the Edina Braemar Arenaff,rom February 3, 1968 to December 29, 1978. COUNCILMAN SHAW',S.SERVICE TO CITY CITED. Mayor Van Valkenburg expressed Council's gratitude to MrvWillis F. Shaw for his many years of public service to the City and presented" :lm a plaque inscribed: ., To =� WILLIS F. SHAW 9 From the residents and City Council of the City of Edina MN gratefully acknowledge his generous, gracious, and public - spirited ORDINANCE NO. 811 -A123 (KERR COMPANIES) GRANTED FIRST READING. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Acting Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Mr. Hughes recalled the request for rezoning from R -1 Single Family District to 0 -2 Office District for the property generally located at 4917 Eden Avenue was considered at the last meeting. At that time Council instructed the proponents to return with a preliminary site plan based on a building of 4 stories in height, having approximately 40,000 sq. feet of leasable floor area. Mr. Hughes stated that the proponents have returned with a proposal for that type of building and have prepared a site plan which has been reviewed by the staff, and that they have found no variances would be necessary. Mr. Bob Martin- son, representing the Kerr Companies, stated that they had complied with Council's request and presented a model of the scheme for which they are requesting rezoning, showing the scale and utilization of the site. He indicated the building would be a 4 -story building, approximately 70 ft. wide and 180 ft. long with about 10,200 sq. feet net rentable on each floor; that it would be limited to under 48 ft. in height and could be built within a 12 ft. floor to floor height. The parking requirement for this building would be 240 parking spaces on the site. This would permit green space around the building in sufficient quantity to have outdoor sitting areas next to the building and for trees to be planted within the parking areas to break the scale of that down and to offer some shading. In response to a question of Mrs. Pat Senior, 4503 Golf Terrace, Mr. Martinson ex- plained that the site is working to their benefit in that it would allow depressed parking and therefore the majority of the parking area would be shielded from Willson Road. Mr. John Senior recalled that possible traffic congestion had been discussed previously and asked whether it would be possible to sign the exit from the parking lot so that right turns would be prohibited, to protect residents in the neighboring area from excessive traffic. Mr. Hughes responded that prohibit- ing traffic access has been tried in other places in the City and has usually resulted in compounding traffic problems in other areas. Mr. Hoffman stated that it could be signed that-way, but would be difficult to enforce. Dr. Harry B. Hall, 4902 Lakeview Drive, stated he did not understand why this was not a desirable residential properly, as the houses located just south of the site were closer to the highway than any houses which could be put on the subject property. Mr. Hughes responded that the City has received numerous complaints about noise generated from 11%q. 100 and the Crosstown; that there would be an air quality I2 /]S /18 12 problem; that the shape of the property would not lend itself to providing many of the amenities that normally are desirable in a residential area; and from the land use standpoint the property is bounded by a highway on one side, commercial property on another and a private golf course on the third side which .leads to a use that is mar- commercial than residential '_n nature. Ln response to Co•ncilman Richards' inquiry regarding financing, Mr. Martinson responded they were waiting for first reading of the rezoning ordinance but were now prepared to discuss financing with the mortgage bankers. He further stated that the developers and land owner had discussed costs for the project, and that the developers now have built into the project cost a value of $200,000 for the land. Councilman Richards then suggested that a condition for granting rezoning approval be a restriction would would run with the land and be a recorded document that it will never be used for medical office space, and further, inasmuch as the property is being developed for the first time, that in lieu of land a cash dedication of $16,000 be required. Mayor Van Valkenburg stated that he felt this would be a workable solution for the use of the land and worthy of support. Councilman Courtney then offered the following ordinance for First Reading, subject to the land use restriction and a cash dedi- cation of $16,000: ORDINANCE NO. 811 -A123 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 811) BY ADDING TO THE OFFICE DISTRICT (0 -2) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Paragraph 1 of Section 8 of Ordinance No. 811 of the City is amended by adding the following thereto: "The extent of the Office District (Sub- District 0 -2) is enlarged by the addition of the following property: Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 390 and Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1021, which is in Sub - District 0 -2) Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Motion to approve First Reading was seconded by Councilman Shaw. Ayes: Courtney, Richards, Shaw, Van Valkenburg Mays: None Abstaining was Councilwoman Schmidt. av -s -o "' o ce- were-presented by Acting Clerk, approved and°ordered'�pl ace d: on file. Mr. Hughes advised that the George W. Baird House, located at._4�400 W. 50th Street and now owned by Dickenson G. Wiltz, has been reviewed by the.Heiitage Preservation Board and the Planning Commission, and the recommendation -`has been forwarded that it be zoned Heritage Preservation District. Mr. Foster Dunwiddie, Chairman of the Edina Heritage Preservation Board, presented the "History of the house which was built in 1886 by George W. Baird, and his wife'Sarah Gates Baird, important figures in the early history of Edina. The houses signed by Charles S. Sedgwick, is a fine example of Queen Ann style and the only'structure of its kind in Edina. He stated that it is of architectural and historic significance and should be preserved. Mr. Dunwiddie explained that the "owner was aware that the rezoning would put restrictions on any exterior modifications of the house, and that Mr. Wiltz does not oppose the rezoning. The-'house has been nominated to the National Register of Historic Places and would`Ybe reviewed by the State Historical Board early in 1979. Mr. Erickson assured..Councilman Richards that the rezoning ordinance would be placed of record for this particular property. No further discussion being heard, Councilman Courtney offered the following ordinance for First Reading, with waiver of Second ;Reading and moved its adoption as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 811 -A124 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 811) BY ADDING TO -,THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DISTRICT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY,O_F EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 11 -o- ; Ordinance No. 811 of the City of Edina is hereby amended by adding the following thereto: "Sec. 9. Boundarieof Heritage Preservation District. The boundaries of the Heritage Preservation�District shall include the following described property: The South 295.,;feet of the East 200 feet of the West 630 feet of the Northeast one quarter, ection 18, Township 28, Range 24, and other lands.', which are hereafter added to this paragraph by amendments to.this ordinance." r Sec. 2:'.rt��This ordinance shall be' in full force and effect upon its passage and publicafion. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt:? Rol call: — nST7$p 5�iC "��L��d i L_lS "'XG s.J) �«,'6xiv WLkh _i 7Thtr_xiah4�wa•k rLney_;-- xicnaras;-scnmlat, Shaw, Van Valkenburg e 4/2/79 82 r being 67' West of the East line of said Lot 24; rllcnr_(! Southerly to a point in the South line of Lot 16, Block 3, Fairfax Add'n. said point being; 67' I -Jest of the East line of said Lot 16; Thence Westerly to- the;iSouttiwest �c rner of Eai2[ '9, Block 4, Fairfax, Add'n- Southerly ° - along the-.center :of -Block 4 '"`' Fairfax ' d'n. and ex_ ... trs extens ionMto the center line of W. 59 ti Street; Thence Northwesterlyt'to a point im"thke� "South "line of Lot 13, Block 5, Fairfax Add'n. said point being.40' West of West of the Southeast corner of said Lot 13; Thence Northwesterly--id the Northwest corner of Lot 16, Block 6, Fairfax Addition; Thence Southwesterly' to the Southwest corner of Lot 12, Block 7, Fairfax Addition; Thence Westerly along the North line of W. 59th Street to the center line of Ashcroft Ave.; thencee Southerly along the center line of Ashcroft Ave. to the centerline of W. 60th Str et; thence Southwest- erly to the Southeast corner of Lot 5, Block 2, Virginia Ave' Addition; Thence Westerly to the Southwest corner of said Lot 5; Thence Southerly along the East line of Lot 12, Block 2, Virginia Ave. Addition to the Southeast corner of said Lot 12; Thence Westerly to the Southwest corner of said-'�Lot 12; Thence Westerly to the Southeast corner of Lot 5, Block 1, Virginia Ave. Addition; Thence Westerly to the Southwest corner of said Lot 5; Thence North, long the West line of said Lot 5 to the Southeast corner of Lot 12, Block 1, Virginia Ave. Addition; Thence Westerly to the Southwest corner of said Lot 12;_�Thence Northwesterly to a point in the East line of Lot 2, Block 1, Code's First "Add'n. said point being 10' South of the Northeast corner of said Lot 1; Thence,kortherly along the East line of said Lot 2 and its extension to the North line of W. 60th Street; Thence West along the North line of W. 60th Street to.tle East Right of Way line of State Hwy. 100; Thence North along the East Right oflW'ay line to the Northwest corner of Lot 8, Block 2, School Manor Addition; Thence Northeasterly to a point on the West line of Lot 4, Block 2, School Manor Addition said point being 40' South of the Northwest corner thereof; Thence.East parallel to the North line of said Lot 4; Thence Northeasterly to the Northeast corner of said Lot 4; Thence Northeast- erly to the Northwest of corner of: °7Lot 1, Block 1, School Manor; Thence North on an extension of the East line of-.,Ruth Drive, a distance of 300'; Thence North- westerly to a point 700' North of the centerline of W. 59th St. and 235' East of the East Right of Way line °of State Highway 100; Thence West parallel to the center line of W. 59th St. to;the East Right of Way line of State Highway 100; Thence North along the East-., ight of Way line of State Highway 100 to a point 115' South of the North line of Lot 3, Block 1, Golf Terrace Heights; Thence Northeasterly to.the Northeast corner of said Lot 3; Thence Northwesterly to a point 270' North of the:South line and 170' East of the West line of Section 18, Township 28, Range 24;,.Thence East parallel to the South line of S.18, T. 289 R. 24 a distance of 1°340'; Thence South 270' to the Northwest corner of Lot 7, Block 3, Hansen and Parks 1st Addition; Thence South along the West line of said Lot 7 a distance of/'60'; Thence East 60' South of and parallel to the North line of Hansen znd;''Parks 1st Addition to the East line of Lot 1, Block 1, Hansen and Parks 1st Addition; Thence Northeasterlv to point of beginning; and Lot 3, Block i, How's Addition; Lots 2 thru 6, MacMillan's First Addition; Lots 1 and 2 Block 1, Code'.s'First Addition; Lots 6 thru 11, Virginia Ave. Addition; Lots 10 thru 12, Block 4, Fairfax; Lots 12 thru 14, Block 6, Fairfax; Lots 13 thru 24, Block 10, Fairfax; Parcel 6201, Section 19, T. 28, R. 24. Florence B. Hallberg, City Clerk Motion fo adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilman Richards. Rollcall: Ayes'�Y Bredesen, Courtney, Richards, Van Valkenburglz HALLA PROPERTY REZONING (ORDINANCE NO. 811 -A123) GRANTED SECOND READING WITH PUB_- CATION TO BE WITHHELD; HALLA ENTERPRISES REGISTERED LAND SURVEY GRAINITED PRELIMI- NARY APPROVAL. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Mr. Hughes recalled that Ordinance No. 811 -A123 had been granted First Reading on December 18, 1978, and that in conjunction with the rezoning, a new registered land survey for the subject property is being pro- posed to divide the property into two parcels, with Tract A being the Perkins Restaurant and parking lot and Tract B being the proposed office building site. Mr. Hughes recalled that First Reading was granted subject to the following condi- tions: 1) that the net leasable floor area of the proposed office building is not to exceed 40,000 square feet; 2) that no dental or medical offices be allowed in the building; 3) that there be a maximum height limit of four stories; and 4) that a $16,000 subdivision dedication fee be donated to the City. Mr. Hughes advised that he has received a declaration of restrictions and protective coven ants for the parcel but that, because of a problem with the title opinion, he does not have the necessary signatures on the protective covenants and restric- tions. He advised further that he has also received an irrevocable letter of credit for the $16,000 subdivision dedication fee which is proposed to be redeemed �1 at the time a building permit is issued for the property or within one year 83 , I whichever would occur first. Mr. Hughes said that the letter of credit appears to be in good form except that the date to which it would run is shown as June 30, 1979, rather than one year from the date of the Second Reading of the ord- inance. He summarized by saying that the conditions imposed by the Council on December 18, 1975, have been agreed to in form and in concept but that they have not been executed for final form at this time. Mr. Hughes then presented the Preliminary Registered Land Survey'which includes the Perkins Restaurant site and the parking lot for the restaurant as Tract A and the office building site being Tract B. In response to a question of Mayor Van Valkenburg, Mr. Erickson said that the letter of credit would be payable on the action of the Council at the end of a year. Mr. Hughes clarified that if the zoning is not used within a period of one year, the zoning would lapse and that if a year has elapsed before the building permit is granted, then the letter of credit could be redeemed or the property rezoned to its original zoning. No further discussion being heard, Councilman Richards offered the following resolution and moved its adoption, with the understanding that the City can draw on the letter of credit on June 30, 1979, or when a building permit is issued, whichever first occurs: RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FOR HALLA ENTERPRISES PRELIMINARY REGISTERED LAND SURVEY BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain Registered Land Survey, located West of Willson Road, East of T.H. 100 and South of Eden Ave., and presented to the Edina City Council by Donald and David Halla at its meeting of April 2, 1979, be and is hereby granted pre- liminary approval. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilman Courtney. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Courtney, Richards, Van Valkenburg Nays: None Resolution adopted. Councilman Richards then offered Ordinance No. 811 -A123 for Second Reading and moved its adoption as follows, with the understanding that publication be with- held pending receipt of executed protective covenants and restrictions: ORDINANCE NO. 811 -A123 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 811) BY ADDING TO THE OFFICE DISTRICT (0 -2) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Paragraph 1 of Section 8 of Ordinance No. 811 of the City is amended by adding the following thereto: "The extent of the Office District (Sub- District 0 -2) is enlarged by the addition of the following property: Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 390 and Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1021, which is in Sub - District 0 -2). Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilman Courtney. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Courtney, Richards, Van Valkenbur Nays: None Ordinance adopted. ATTEST: City Clerk r TA1' ,7IT,, , LOCK 1 ` PARKW0OD._ KNOLLS °�115TH- °ADDITION DIVISION APPROVED Augiies` °pre- sentedl'6?' etfftion for division of Lot 7, Block 1, Parkwood.- Knolls 15th Addition, along the party wall. No objections being heard, Councilman Courtney offered the following resolution and moved its adoption, subject"X6 the proponent installing separate sewer and water connections to each_unif %r i obtaining a waiver from this requirement from the Building Construction :_Appeals Board: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described_.propefty is at present a single tract of land: Lot 7, Block 1, Parkwood--Knolls 15th Addition; and WHEREAS, the owner has requested the subdivision of said tract into separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows: The North 60'feet of Lot 7, Block 1, Parkwood Knolls 15th Addition; and Lot i,except the North 60 feet thereof, Block 1, Parkwood Knolls 15th Addit ion and WHEREAS, the requested,subdivi "sion is� authorized under Ordinance` °No 801 and it 4 l4 I I . has been determined__that: compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the =City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as r �' REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: The Mayor and City Council FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000 DATE. November 17, 1988 AGENDA ITEM IV. A ITEM DESCRIPTION: Reconstruction of Executive Course building _Company Amount of Quote or &d 1. Palani Construction 2. Giza Construction $ 1809000 2_ 182,700 3. VanEckout Builders 3. 4. T.C.I. Construction 4 1859093 . 5. Ferichs Construction 5. 188,396 203,500 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Palani Construction $ 180,000 GENERAL INFORMATION: We had a total of 16 bids ranging from a low of $180,000 to a high of $266,000. Estimates for the total A -frame replacement were $250,000. The Recommended bid is Park and Recreation within budget not Kenneth Rosland, City Wallin, F#ance Director BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE A -FRAME REPLACEMENT NOVEMBER 17, 1988 PALANI.CONSTRUCTION $180,000 GIZA CONSTRUCTION $182,700 VANECKOUT BUILDERS $185,093 T.C.I. CONSTRUCTION $188,396 FERICHS CONSTRUCTION $203,500 E.D.M. CONSTRUCTION $206,485 C. O. FIELD CONSTRUCTION $207,500- ZASTROW - NASSETT CONSTRUCTION $210,500 PARKOS CONSTRUCTION $213,305 MORCON CONSTRUCTION $221,430 W. H. CATES CONSTRUCTION $228,900 MERRIMAC CONSTRUCTION $243,990 ROBERT AHLSTROM CONSTRUCTION $250,428 ROY NORDENSTROM CONSTRUCTION $252,000 RON GRAVES LANDSCAPE $2.62,183 DAVID VOLKMANN CONSTRUCTION $266,260 V. A MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: OTHERS PRESENT: SECTION A MINUTES TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE NOVEMBER 15, 1988 10:30 A.M. Fran Hoffman, Chairman Gordon Hughes Craig Swanson Alison Fuhr Ms. Kathryn A. Rivers, 6720 Rosemary Lane Ms. Sharon A. Johnson, 6700 Rosemary Lane Mr. Ronald G. Johnson, 6700 Rosemary Lane Mr. R. D. Schulte, 6701 Rosemary Lane Ms. Marlene A. Rutman, 6728 Rosemary Lane Mr. Richard Novack, 6521 Ridgeview Drive Ms. Helen Mahoney, 6716 Rosemary Lane Ms. JoAnn Pirsch, 6709 Rosemary Lane Ms. Merris K. Dahlgren, 6705 Rosemary Lane Mr. James Schwarz, 6708 Cahill Road Requests on which the Committee recommends approval as requested or modified, and the Council's authorization of recommended action. (1) Discuss traffic safety concerns, 6500 block Ridgeview Drive. Continued from October, 1988 meeting. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Hoffman began by reviewing the motion from the October meeting to include inspection of possible clearview violations, assessment of traffic volumes, overall review by Traffic Enforcement Unit, and input from neighborhood regarding possible sidewalk installation. From the Engineer- ing Department standpoint, the volumes were 1500+ vehicles per day and, therefore, Ridgeview Drive is classified as a collector street. Mr. Swanson stated that the Traffic Enforcement Unit had conducted a radar survey on Ridgeview Drive for northbound and soundbound traffic. This survey was done in an unmarked vehicle for four (1) one -hour periods. In total, six (6) violators were observed with the highest speed being 40 mph. After completion of the survey, the Unit was assigned to enforcement in the area. There were twelve (12) occasions of enforcement in October which TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING November 15, 1988 Page 2 (Continued) resulted in seven (7) citations and four (4) warnings being issued. A study of accident history in the area was also done. There were two (2) reportable accidents, one in January and one in November of 1984. Mr. Novack reiterated the neighborhood concern being heavier volumes during the peak rush hour periods and increased speeds noticed mainly at the close of each school day. Mr. Hoffman - explained to Mr.-Novack that repeated enforcement efforts do, in fact, tend to slow traffic patterns. He in turn asked Mr. Novack if there was a final decision from the neighborhood regarding the installation of sidewalks on Ridgeview Drive. Mr. Novack stated that he had approached those who he felt would be most opposed to installation of sidewalks. At present, the idea was still being considered and those surveyed had wanted to view statistics involving accidents, volume changes, etc. Mr. Swanson moved to include Ridgeview Drive in the Traffic Enforcement Unit's schedule of continued enforcement activity until the end of 1988, and further moved that the neighborhood continue surveying the issue of sidewalk installation on Ridgeview Drive. Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Motion carried 3 -0. (2) Request to sign both sides of Rosemary Lane, "NO PARKING, 8 AM - 3 PM, SCHOOL DAYS ". Petition received from all residents on Rosemary Lane. ACTION TAKEN: Mrs. Dahlgren, representing the neighborhood, expressed the concern of the group that there was increased traffic, noise, litter and activity in their neighborhood since students began parking on Rosemary Lane during school hours. This parking was precipitated by the installation of "NO PARKING" signs on Chapel Lane, accompanied by stricter enforcement policies about parking at two area churches. A neighborhood study shows the students will be restricted from parking in the lot of St. Patrick's Church and towing will begin November 21. Calgary Church will also be off limits to student parking, so this will mean more residential parking by students. Mrs. Dahlgren said that the neighborhood was unanimous in petitioning for the signs and the only request they had would be to make the signs effective during school hours only, thereby allowing summer and weekend parking. Mr. Hoffman stated that at the last City Council Meeting, Councilman Smith volunteered to act as a liason to the School Board with regard to this issue. He will be meeting with the Board to discuss their current policy regarding parking on school grounds versus residential parking and will also advise them of the impact the present policy has on the surrounding neighborhoods. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING November 15, 1988 Page 3 (Continued) W A resident also questioned the possible "hooding" of signs during special events and was advised by Mr. Swanson that this type of procedure was presently being considered and reviewed and, therefore, a definitive answer could not be given. Another resident asked about the possibility of posting signs which had time limitations of perhaps two hours. He was also advised by Mr. Swanson that time limitation signs were very hard to enforce based on manpower at any given time and the overall ineffectiveness of such signs. Mr. Hughes moved to approve installation of "NO PARKING, 8 AM = 3 PM, SCHOOL DAYS" signs on both sides of Rosemary Lane. Mr. Swanson seconded the motion. Motion carried 3 -0. (3) Request for "STOP" or "YIELD" signs at the intersection of St. John's Avenue and Garrison Lane /Ashcroft Lane. Request received from LeRoy Swanson, 6321 Ashcroft Lane. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Swanson reviewed the accident history in this area which showed two (2) reportable accidents, one in 1985 and one in 1988. Both of these accidents appeared to be right -of -way related. Mr. Hoffman moved the placement of "YIELD "signs on Ashcroft Lane and Garrison Lane at the intersection of St. John's Avenue. Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Motion carried 3 -0. (4) Review request to permit parking on the north side of West 50th Street, east of Edina Court to Maple Road, on Sundays only from 10 AM to 12:30 PM. Continued from April, 1988 meeting. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Swanson began by stating that, to date, there have been no complaints that he is aware of since the signs were installed in April. Mr Hoffman also concurred with this. Mr. James Schwarz stated his only observation was that people attending the 9:00 AM church service also seemed to be parking in this area, even though it was in violaiton of the 10 AM restriction as stated on the present signs. He asked that the time restrictions be changed, if possible, to accommodate these people. Mr. Swanson moved to permanently place "NO PARKING EXCEPT SUNDAY, 8:30 AM - 12:30 PM" signs on the north side of West 50th Street, east of Edina Court iw TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING. November 15, 1988 Page 4 (Continued) to Maple Road; and also moved that St. Stephen's include notation in their church bulletin to instruct patrons to park as closely to curbline as possible. Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Motion carried 3 -0. (5) Review Hennepin County response to request for traffic controls at the intersection of Interlachen Boulevard and Bywood West. Continued from June, 1988 meeting. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Hoffman reviewed a letter which was received from Mr. Dennis Hansen, County Traffic Engineer for Hennepin County. The letter, in essence, stated based on the results of speed and volume studies conducted by Hennepin County, and the conclusion that the accident ratio was minimal, additional traffic control devices could not be justified. The letter went on to say the placement of such controls could, in fact, be.detrimental to safety on this particular stretch of roadway. Mr. Hughes moved that the Committee acknowledge receipt of the above referenced letter, send this letter to the Council for their review, and also forward a copy of same to the Edina School District for their review. Mr. Swanson seconded the motion. Motion carried 3 -0. SECTION B Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request. NONE. SECTION C Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others. (1) Discuss traffic safety concerns at the intersection of Rabun Drive and West 70th Street. Request received from Andrea Wersell, 5124 Tifton Drive. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Hoffman opened by stating that this area had been reviewed before. It was his opinion that the traffic control device at the ramp of Highway 100 and West 70th Street was at too close a proximity to West 70th Street and Rabun Drive to warrant consideration of installing an additional device. Signs have been installed to prevent southbound traffic from .. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES November 15, 1988 Page 5 (Continued) turning westbound on a red light between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM, but surveys have shown that there are a number of violations to this restriction. A discussion was also held regarding how much of a safety hazard a parked patrol vehicle might present in this high volume area. Mr. Hoffman felt that the safest solution might be larger "NO TURN ON RED" signs and possibly some sort of pavement markings. There have been five (5) accidents in six years at this intersection and these appear to have been right -of -way accidents. They also did not occur at what are considered peak times. r Mr. Hoffman also stated that the record would appear to show more of an inconvenience problem at Rabun Drive than actually a safety problem. Mr. Hoffman moved to have the Engineering Department review this inter- section further for possible alternatives. Mr. Swanson seconded the motion. Motion carried 3 -0. Respectfully submitted, EDINA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE r FMDEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 320 Washington Ave. South HENNEPIN Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 -8468 UU 935 -3381 October 24, 1988 Mr. Francis J. Hoffman, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Interlachen Boulevard in Vicinity of Bywood West Dear Mr. Hoffman: Ste; i As requested by the City Council and the Traffic Safety Committee, our department has made a review of pedestrian safety and speeds along Interlachen Boulevard in the vicinity of Bywood West. A recent accident involving a school child near the Interlachen /Bywood West intersection prompted the request for this review. In this endeavor traffic volume on a typical weekday was recorded at Interlachen Boulevard and Bywood West intersection, the accident record of Interlachen Boulevard was analyzed, and speed studies were conducted at select locations on Interlachen. Copies of all studies are enclosed. The traffic volume studies were taken on September 12, 1988. These studies consisted of counting, with mechanical recorders, the eastbound and westbound traffic on Interlachen and the southbound traffic on Bywood West. The volumes recorded were compared with those necessary to justify an all -way stop warrant. The warrants require an average of at least 500 vehicles per hour entering an intersection for each eight hours on a typical weekday. Of this volume, at least 200 units (vehicles and pedestrians) must be from the minor roadway (Bywood West). As noted on the traffic volume sheet three hours of the day the total volume entering the intersection exceeds 500 vehicles; however, there are no hours where the side street exceeds 200 units. In fact, the highest hour of approach on Bywood West occurred between 1:00 and 2:00 P.M. when but 25 were recorded. The intersection obviously falls substantially below the warranting requirements for an all -way stop. On the 1.33 mile segment of Interlachen between Blake Road and Brookside Avenue eighteen accidents occurred during the five year period of 1983 -87. This results in a five year average of 0.88 accidents per million vehicle miles compared to a' County wide average rate for two lane urban roadways of 2.03 accidents per million vehicle miles. None of the eighteen accidents involved pedestrians and only one involved a bicycle. Two vehicular accidents occurred at Bywood West, both in 1987. HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer October 24, 1988 Mr. Francis J. Hoffman Page 2 The posted speed limit on Interlachen is 30 miles per hour. Speed studies were taken at Williams Avenue and just east of the Interlachen Country Club driveway. These studies showed 85th percentile speeds on Interlachen of 37 and 39 miles per hour, respectively. Correspondingly, the ten mile per hour pace increment speed was from 30 -39 MPH (31 -40 for eastbound at the Country Club driveway) and the model speed ranged from 33 to 36 MPH. The results of these studies would indicate that additional traffic controls at the Interlachen and Bywood West intersection would be difficult to justify. None of the traffic characteristics of volume and accidents indicate that there would be a benefit to more stringent traffic control. To the contrary, the interjection of an unjustified, unexpected stop control on Interlachen could work to the detriment of safety record along that roadway. Should additional information be desired concerning this matter, please call me at 935 -3381. Sincerely, - L Dennis L. Hansen, P.E. County Traffic Engineer DLH:gk Attachment cc: Patrick B. Murphy A. 0 • N�bRPON`,ti // � O .880 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KENNETH ROSLAND CITY MANAGER From: GORDON HUGHES ASSISTANT,CITY MANAGER Date: NOVEMBER 21, 1988 Subject: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT - SOUTHDALE AREA Recommendation: Agenda Item # -y-a Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA El To Council Action F-1 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion City Council should review the draft program and authorize transmittal to the Richfield and Edina School Districts and Hennepin County. Info /Background: We have discussed on several occasions the possibility of establishing a tax increment financing district for the purpose of financing public improvements in the Southdale and Galleria area. These improvements include the extension of the transit system northerly from Centennial Lakes and the upgrading of public streets adjoining Southdale and the Galleria. In order to establish a tax increment financing district for this area, the City could create an Economic Development District. Economic Development Districts are intended for primarily coimiercial areas and no findings of blight, blighting factors, or unusual soil conditions are required to be made as is the case for Redevelopment Districts such as those established for Hedberg /Edinborough, 50th and France and Grandview. Due to the characteristics of the Southdale /Galleries area, we do not believe the necessary findings could be made to create a Redevelopment District. ff, Tax increment districts that are created via the Economic Development District process may collect increments for only 8 -10 years as opposed to twenty -five years as in the case of a Redevelopment District. Therefore, the capacity of Economic Development District's to finance improvements is substantially less than Redevelopment District's. Mr. Gilligan and I have prepared the attached draft Development Program for the creation of an Economic Development District for that portion of the City located south of the Crosstown Highway and east of France Avenue. Within this area, we suggest that a tax increment financing district be established for Southdale and the Galleria. Increments collected from the expansion of Southdale and the Galleries could then be used to finance eligible public improvements throughout the Economic Development District. In order to capture such increments, the City must approve the tax increment financing plan prior to the issuance of building permits for the building expansions. Procedurally, the Development Program must be reviewed by the Community Development and Planning Commission and acted upon by the City Council at a public hearing. The Development Program must. izowever, be forwarded to affected school districts and Hennepin County at least thirty (30) days prior to the hearing. In this case, both the Edina and Richfield School Districts are affected. Given the nature of the proposed district and the debate at the State level concerning tax increment financing, I suggest the Council review the draft program prior to forwarding it to the school districts and County for comment. 1 r � DRAFT NO. 1 Dated 11/11/88 DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. L and TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 88 -2 1988 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TABLE OF CONTENTS This Table of Contents is for convenience of reference only and is not part of the Development Program or the Tax Increment Financing Plan. Page I. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 A. Statement of Need and Statutory Authority . . . . 1 B. Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II. DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 A. Statement of Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 B. Property To Be Included in Development District . . . . . . . . . . . 4 C. Development Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 D. Environmental Controls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 - E. Land Use Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 F. Open Space To Be Created . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 G. Operation of Development District . . . . . . . . 5 H. Reuse of Private Property . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 I. Property Acquisition, Site Preparation, Relocation and Land Disposition . . . . . . . . 5 III. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 88 -1 . . . . . . 6 A. Statement of Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 B. Development Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 C. Property To Be Included in Tax Increment District. 6 D. Estimated Capital and Administration Costs . . . . 6 E. Payment of Capital and Administrative Costs. . . . 7 F. Determination and Use of Tax Increment . . . . . . 8 G. Impact of Tax Increment Financing on Other Taxing Jurisdictions . . . . . . . . . . 10 IV. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAM AND PLAN . . . . . . . . 10 V. AMENDMENTS TO PROGRAM AND PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 EXHIBITS A. Map of Development District No. 1 B. Legal Description of Development District No. 1 C. Map of Tax Increment Financing District No. 88 -2 D. Legal Description of Tax Interest Financing District No. 88 -2 E. Description of Anticipated Private Development F. Description of Public Transit System G. Estimated Tax Increment I. INTRODUCTION A. Statement of Need and Statutory Authority. The area,in City of Edina located south of Highway 62 and east of France Avenue South is currently suffering from traffic congestion, and it is expected that because of the development which the City anticipates will occur in this area, such problems will increase in the ,future. The City Council has determined that in order to alleviate the traffic congestion in this area and on adjacent streets and to otherwise assure development of this area occurs in an orderly manner consistent with the goals of the City it is necessary to include this area in a Development District to be designated as Development District No. 1 and to take certain action pursuant to a Development Program (the "Program "). In order to finance the capital and administration costs of the Program, it is proposed that the City adopt a tax increment financing plan (the "Plan "), which provides for the creation of Tax Increment Financing District No. 88 -2 (the "District "). . The Program and the Plan are adopted by the City Council of the City pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047 and 469.174 to 469.179. B. Definitions. Each of the words and terms defined in this Section shall for all purposes of the Program and the Plan, have the meanings given to them in this Section B: "Anticipated Private Development" means the anticipated private development to occur in the Tax Increment District as more fully described in Exhibit E hereto. "Assessed Value" means the assessed value of all taxable property in the District as determined from time to time pursuant to state law. "Bonds" means the tax increment bonds and any other obligations issued by-the City, the principal of and interest on which are payable in whole or in part out of the Tax Increment, to finance or provide for the payment of the Capital and Administrative Cost. "Bond Resolution" means any and all resolutions, ordinances, trust indentures or other documents under which any Bonds are sold, issued or secured. "Capital and Administrative Costs" means the total amount expended and to be expended by .the City on Development Activities as provided in this Plan. "Captured Assessed Value" means that portion of the Assessed Value in excess of the Original Assessed Value as \ adjusted from time to time, if any. "City" means the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota. "Development Activities" means all actions taken or to be taken by the City or HRA in establishing, implementing j and carrying out the Program. "Development Agreement" means any and all agreements between the City and one or more of the Developers with respect to any of the Facilities. "Development District" means Development District: No. 1 of the City as established pursuant to this Program. "HRA" means the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota. "Mill Rate" means with respect to taxes payable in any year the lesser of (i) the local taxing district mill rates for taxes payable in such year or (ii) the "original mill rate" as defined and calculated in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subdivision la. "Original Assessed Value" means the Assessed Value of all taxable property in the Tax Increment District as most recently determined by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota as of'the date of certification thereof by the County Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177 and as thereafter adjusted and certified by the County Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177. "Outstanding" when used with respect to the Bonds, means Bonds which have not been paid, redeemed or discharged in accordance with their terms or the terms of a Bond Resolution. "Parcel" means a lot, parcel or tract of plat of land comprising a single unit for purposes of assessment for real estate tax purposes, as of the date of adoption of this Plan. "Plan" means the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Tax Increment District as approved and as supplemented and amended from time to time by the City Council of the City. "Public Transit System" means the proposed public transit system to be operated,in the Development District as more fully described in Exhibit F hereto. -2- "Program" means this Development Program as supplemented and amended from time to time by the City Council of the City. "Tax Increment" means that portion of the ad valorem taxes generated by the extension of the Mill Rate to the Captured Assessed Value of taxable property in the Tax Increment District. "Tax Increment Bonds" means the approximately $ General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, to be issued by the City in one or more series to finance all or a portion of the Capital and Administrative Costs. "Tax Increment District" means Tax Increment ;f Financing District No. 88 -2 of the City. -3- 7 W, II. DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 A. Statement of Objectives. The objectives sought to be accomplished by the City in establishing and carrying out the Development Activities and in financing the Capital and Administrative Costs, as specified herein, are to meet the needs specified in Section A of the Introduction: a. by promoting and securing the prompt development of the property in the Development District in a manner consistent with applicable governmental comprehensive plans and with a minimal adverse impact on the environment, some of which property is not now in productive use; e. by undertaking and providing moneys for the payment of the cost of Development Activities in or �._ adjacent to the Development District which are necessary to serve the Development District and for the orderly and beneficial development of the Development District. B. Property To Be Included in Development District. The property located in the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, the legal description of which appears on Exhibit B hereto, shall constitute the,Development District. C. Development Activities. The Development Activities include the following: 1. By the City, (1) the making of studies and planning and informational activities relating to the Development District; (2) the acquisition of right of way for the Public Transit System to operate in the Development District and the.acquisition of equipment for the Public Transit System;`_(3) the improvement of public streets which are in the Development District or are adjacent to the Development District; (4) the issuance of the Tax Increment Bonds to finance the Capital and Administrative Costs or to evidence the -4- b. by controlling then ntte s test land uses to '~? alleviate existing and future —trdf ific impacts in the t� _�Qevelopment District and on adjacent streets; I� c. by promoting alternatives to travel by automobile y' /in order-to alleviate congestion and the volume of traffic 'Al in the Development District and on adjacent streets; d. by securing the increase of property subject to i taxation by the City, Hennepin County, Independent School District No. 280 and other local governmental taxing jurisdictions in order to better enable such entities to pay for public improvements and governmental services and programs required to be provided by them; and e. by undertaking and providing moneys for the payment of the cost of Development Activities in or �._ adjacent to the Development District which are necessary to serve the Development District and for the orderly and beneficial development of the Development District. B. Property To Be Included in Development District. The property located in the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, the legal description of which appears on Exhibit B hereto, shall constitute the,Development District. C. Development Activities. The Development Activities include the following: 1. By the City, (1) the making of studies and planning and informational activities relating to the Development District; (2) the acquisition of right of way for the Public Transit System to operate in the Development District and the.acquisition of equipment for the Public Transit System;`_(3) the improvement of public streets which are in the Development District or are adjacent to the Development District; (4) the issuance of the Tax Increment Bonds to finance the Capital and Administrative Costs or to evidence the -4- City's obligation to reimburse the Developer for all or part of the Capital and Administrative Costs incurred or•to be incurred by it pursuant to the Development Agreement; and (5) the use of the Tax Increment to pay the debt service on the Tax Increment Bonds or otherwise pay the Capital and Administrative Costs. D. Environmental Controls. The Development Activities do not pose any environmental problems. No environmental controls, in addition to existing laws and regulations, are contemplated. E. Land Use Considerations. The property in the Development District is currently zoned for its expected use. F. Open Space To Be Created. No additional open space will be created-in the Development District pursuant to this Program. G. Operation of Development District. Unless I directed by the City, the maintenance and operation I the public improvements constructed in the District will be the responsibility of the HRA, as administrator of the District. Each year the HRA will submit to the City Council the maintenance and operation budget for the Development District for the following year. The HRA will administer the Development Dist -rict pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 1 469.131; provided, however, that the HRA may exercise the powers listed in said Section 469.131 only at the direction of ( the City Council. H. Reuse of Private Property. The primary objective of this Development Program is to encourage and assist the improvement and. development of property within the Development District and to alleviate the volume and congestion of traffic in the Development District and on adjacent streets. While it is not expected that the City will acquire property other than for the Public Transit System or other public improvements, to the extent that the City acquires property other than for the Public Transit System or other public improvements, it is the City's intent to assist in the development of such property only as necessary to expedite the eventual development of said property by private individuals or companies. `I I I. Property Acquisition -,Site Preparation, Relocation and Land Disposition. It is intended that the only property to be acquired is the right df way necessary for the operation of the Public Transit System; 'iwhich is not already owned by the City. The right of way will be graded and paved for the operation of the Public Transit System and no relocation is expected to occur as a result of any such acquisition. -5- III. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 88 -1 A. Statement of Obiectives. See Section A of the Development Program. B. Development Program. See Sections C through I of the Development Program. C. Property To Be Included in Tax Increment District. The property located in the City of Edina, Hennepin :County, Minnesota the legal description of which appears on '.� Exhibit C shall constitute the Tax Increment District. 7 D. Estimated Estimated Capital and Administration Costs. Administration Costs. 1. Estimated Costs Right of Way Acquisition $ Equipment for Public Transit System Other Public Improvements Capitalized Interest (net of investment income) Administrative Costs* (including City Administrative, Financial Consultant, Bond Counsel, and other Costs of Issuance of Bonds (including discount)) Total Costs $ The elements and the costs of the Development Activities shown above are estimated to be necessary based upon the information now available. -It is anticipated that the elements and the costs of the Development Activities shown above may decrease or increase, but that the`total Project Costs will not exceed the amount shown above. The City reserves the right to pay the cost of any element of the Capital and Administrative Costs from the proceeds of the Tax Increment Bonds or directly from Tax Increments. ( *The total administrative expense is defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 13 and is estimated to be $ , which amount does not exceed 10% of the total tax increment expenditures, which are estimated to be $ .) 2. Capital Proceed's. The capital-proceeds of the Project, comprising the proceeds of sale of the Property to private developers, are expected to be $0.00. 3. Capital and Administration Costs. The Capital and Administration Costs of the Development District, comprising the total costs expected to be incurred in carrying out the Development Activities by the'City is expected to be $ , plus interest to be paid on the Tax Increment Bonds during their term (other than interest paid from the proceeds of the Tax Increment Bonds). E. Payment of Capital and Administrative Costs. 1. In General. All Capital and Administrative Costs will be paid from Tax Increment either directly or indirectly by payment of debt service on Tax Increment Bonds issued to finance such cost or reimbursement for items of Capital and Administrative Costs paid directly by the City. 2. Issuance of Bonds. It is p- resently. expected that all or a portion of the Capital and Administrative Costs will be financed by the issuance of the Tax Increment Bonds. The Tax Increment Bonds will be issued by the City under authority of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, and Sections 469.174 to 469.179. The principal amount of the Bonds is expected to be The actual principal amount of the Bonds, however, may be less than or exceed this amount, and the right to issue the Bonds in an amount greater than $ to finance such Capital and Administrative Costs is reserved. Similarly, the amount allocated to capitalized interest covers interest payable on the Bonds at an initial rate now.estimated to be approximately _% per annum for a -month period; and the City reserves the right to increase or decrease the amount of capitalized interest to correspond to the interest actually payable on the Bonds over the -month period. 3. Security For Bonds. The Bonds will be general obligations of the City, and the City will pledge its full faith, credit and unlimited taxing .powers to the payment of principal thereof and interest thereon. The principal of and interest on the Bonds are payable primarily, however, from the Tax Increments and no ad valorem tax is expected to be levied for payment of the Bonds and interest thereon in the Bond Resolution. All Tax Increments will be pledged and appropriated to the payment of the Bonds and the interest thereon when due. In addition, such principal and interest will be paid from certain proceeds of the Bonds (capitalized interest) and interest earnings thereon, and, to the extent deemed necessary, from the increment derived from other tax increment districts of the HRA which include property in the Development District. -7- 4. Bond Terms. The terms of the Bonds are expected to be as set forth below; however, the right is reserved to adjust any and all terms of the Bonds to secure the best interest rate obtainable and to insure that the entire principal of and - interest on the Bonds will be paid when due from the sources specified in paragraph 3. The Tax Bonds will be issued in one or more series, in the aggregate principal amount of $ , will mature serially over a period of approximately eight (8) years from the date of receipt by the City of the first Tax Increment from the Tax Increment District will be subject to redemption prior to maturity, will bear a fixed rate or rates of interest from date of issue to maturity, payable semiannually commencing approximately six months after the issuance thereof, and will be sold at public or private sale. F. Determination and Use of Tax Increment. 1. Statutory Authority_ and District Eligibility as an Economic Development District. Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 1Z defines an "economic development district" as a tax increment financing district consisting of a portion of a development district which the authority finds to be in the public interest because it will discourage commerce, industry or manufacturing from moving their operations to another state, will result in increased employment in the municipality or will result in preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the municipality. The City believes the Tax Increment District is an "economic development district" since the Development Activities will result in increased employment in the City and the preservation and enforcement of the tax base of the City. 2. Original Assessed Value. The Assessed Value of all taxable property in the Tax Increment District as most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota, being the certification made in 1988 with respect to the Assessed Value of such property as of January 2, 1988, is $ , which amount is expected to be the Original Assessed Value of the Tax Increment District,, subject to adjustment of % per year pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subdivision 1, based on the average percentage increase in the assessed valuation of property in the Tax Increment District during the last five years. 3. Current Assessed Value. The current Assessed Value of property in the Tax Increment District is $. , the Original Assessed Value. I:]a 4. Captured Assessed Value. It is expected that the Captured Assessed Value of all taxable property in the District, upon completion of the Anticipated Private Developments in the District, will be $ computed as follows: Estimated Assessed Value $ at Completion Less Original Assessed Value at Completion Estimated Captured Assessed Value at Completion 5. Tax Increment Calculation. Assuming the Anticipated Private Developments occur as provided in Exhibit _ hereto it is estimated that the Tax Increment to be received each year for the duration of the Tax Increment District will be set forth in Exhibit G hereto. The estimated amount of Tax Increment set forth in Exhibit G is based upon a Mill Rate of mills. 6. Duration of the Tax Increment District. It is estimated that the Tax Increment District will remain in existence until the 8 years from the date of receipt of the first Tax Increment or 10 years from the date of approval of this Plan, whichever is earlier, or until the City's obligation to pay the Tax Increment Bonds and interest has been discharged in accordance with the resolution. 7. Use of Captured Assessed Value and Tax Increment. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subdivision 2, the City hereby determines that it will use 100% of the Captured Assessed Value of property located in the Tax Increment District, and 100% of the Tax Increments to be derived therefrom, for the entire duration of the-District. 8. Excess Tax Increment. The Tax Increment received from the Tax Increment District in any year not needed to pay debt service on the Tax Increment Bonds coming due on or before August 1 of the following year, shall be used first to reduce any ad valorem property tax levied pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, Subdivision 3, and then shall be used to prepay or discharge outstanding Tax Increment Bonds or pay additional.Capital and Administration Costs, all in accordance with the Bond Resolution. G. Impact of Tax Increment Financing on Other Taxing Jurisdictions. The local government units other than the City which are authorized by law to levy ad valorem property taxes and in which the Tax Increment District is located, are Independent School District No. 280, Hennepin County, the HRA, and various metropolitan area authorities, including the Metropolitan Council, the Metropolitan Transit Commission, the Metropolitan Airports Commission and the Metropolitan Mosquito Control District (the local government units). The taxing jurisdictions encompassing the District will continue to receive taxes as if the Original Assessed Value of the Tax Increment District were unchanged, except for the increase in Original Assessed Value described in Part G(2) of this Plan. This - precludes the jurisdictions from benefiting from a portion of the increase in Assessed Value which results from the Anticipated Private Development Activities or other development of the taxable property in the District. In order to assess the impact of this on Hennepin County, Independent School District No. 280 and the City the following table indicates what percentage the anticipated largest Captured Assessed Value of the Tax Increment District (which occurs in as shown on Exhibit G hereto), is of the present total Assessed Value for such taxing jurisdiction. If the District were not created all of the Captured Assessed Value of the Tax Increment District would be available to the taxing jurisdictions, which would result in an increase in the assessed value of such taxing jurisdictions in each year during the duration of the District in an amount equal to the Captured Assessed Value. IV. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAM AMENDMENT AND PLAN The Program and the Plan shall be implemented on behalf of the City by the City Council and the HRA as administrator of the Program. The City shall sell and issue Tax Increment Bonds in the amounts needed to finance the -10- Estimated Present Largest Total Captured Percent of Taxing Assessed Assessed Total Assessed Jurisdiction Value Value Value Hennepin County $ % I.S.D. No. 280 % City of Edina % If the District were not created all of the Captured Assessed Value of the Tax Increment District would be available to the taxing jurisdictions, which would result in an increase in the assessed value of such taxing jurisdictions in each year during the duration of the District in an amount equal to the Captured Assessed Value. IV. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAM AMENDMENT AND PLAN The Program and the Plan shall be implemented on behalf of the City by the City Council and the HRA as administrator of the Program. The City shall sell and issue Tax Increment Bonds in the amounts needed to finance the -10- Capital and Administrative Costs, less any portion thereof to be paid directly from Tax'Increment and shall use so much of the proceeds of the Tax Increment Bonds available and Tax Increment derived from the Tax Increment District to pay such Capital and Administrative Costs as is necessary. V. AMENDMENTS TO PROGRAM AND PLAN The City reserves the right to amend the Program and the Plan, subject to the provisions of state law regulating such action. The City specifically reserves the right to enlarge the geographic area included in the Tax Increment District, to increase the Capital and Administrative Costs and the principal amount of Bonds to be issued to finance such Capital and Administrative Costs, by following the procedures specified in Section 469.175, Subdivision 4, if and when it is determined to be necessary for the payment of additional Capital and Administrative Costs. This Program and this Tax Increment Financing Plan were adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota on the day of , 1988. Mayor City Manager -11- f w9S�1r �I• o e H O .,�w�,. e INTRODUCTION City Manager's Report: Liquor Stores The City Council requested management to make a study exploring the question - should the City stay in the liquor store busi- ness. This report examines five aspects of this question and sets forth specific perfor- mance targets that the staff would aim toward, should the Council decide to retain Edina's off -sale liquor operations. The first aspect to consider is financial- - including analyses of: .Trends in the liquor store industry .Edina Liquor's profit and loss state- ments .Steps being taken to increase profits The second aspect concerns the worth of the Edina Liquor stores should the Coun- cil elect to abandon the off -sale liquor business. Two questions are examined here: *What would the City realize from sell- ing the business as a going concern? .What would the City receive if the property were sold and the inventory liq- uidated? The third aspect involves the legal con- siderations of selling the stores. V.D The fourth sets forth some social issues in- volving the propriety of the City being in the liquor store business - -what could be called the control side of the picture. The final aspect presented in this report suggests programs to enhance the image of the liquor stores. ASPECT 1: FINANCES Edina's liquor operations generated about $314,000 after all expenses. This performance was attained on approximate- ly $5 million in total sales. Net profit (net income) was approximately 6 %. To give this data perspective, Figure 1 compares Edina's percentage of net profit to gross sales with those of Anoka, Brook- lyn Center, Columbia Heights, Coon Rapids, Eden Prairie, Fridley and Rich- field for 1987. It is clear that Edina is per- forming at or above the average in these comparisons. Columbia Heights Richfield Edina &ooldyn Centro Eden Prairie Moire Coon Rapids Fridley Net Profit as a Percentage of Gross Sales Figure I The actual percentages for net profit and gross sales used in this comparison are as follows: Net Profit Fridley 1.1% Coon Rapids 15% Anoka 2.2% Eden Prairie 4.8% Brooklyn Center 5.8% Edina 6.1% Richfield 6.8% Columbia lights. 7.7% Using the same 8 stores, we also compare gross profit (sales vs. cost of sales) and the cost of labor to produce those sales. The graphs and charts for each of these factors are listed below: Brooklyn Center Eden Prairie Anoka Richfield Edina Columbia Heights Coon Rapids Fridley Gross Profit as a Percentage of Cost of Sales 5 Figure 2 Gross Profit Fridley 1557% Coon Rapids 16.97% Columbia lights. 17.04% Edina 19.22% Richfield 19.76% Anoka 2055% Eden Prairie 21.84% Brooklyn Center 23.62% City of Edina City Manager's Report: Liquor Stores Anoka Edina Brooklyn Centai Fridley Eden Prairie Richfield Coon Rapids Columbia Heights Labor Costs as a Percentage of Gross Sales Figure 3 1 o. Using these comparisons, we come to the conclusion that leads us to our first TAR- GET. . TARGET L Increase Net Profit to 10% of gross Sales. Although the Edina Liquor Stores have not reached this level of performance, 10% is an attainable TARGET according to our research. TARGETS H and III are proposed here as possible methods to achieve TARGET I. 2 Labor % Columbia Fights. 53% Coon Rapids 73% Richfield 73% Eden Prairie 7.9% Fridley 92% Brooklyn Center 9.9% Edina 10.2% Anoka 10.4% Using these comparisons, we come to the conclusion that leads us to our first TAR- GET. . TARGET L Increase Net Profit to 10% of gross Sales. Although the Edina Liquor Stores have not reached this level of performance, 10% is an attainable TARGET according to our research. TARGETS H and III are proposed here as possible methods to achieve TARGET I. 2 �l 9 • TARGET II. Stabilize the number of employees necessary to operate the stores with optimum productivity. One area management can control is labor costs. Liquor store managers provide monthly reports that itemize the number of employee hours required to operate the stores. These requirements have decreased from a year ago. During the same year, sales have increased. I have instructed the store managers to be continually aware, to report to me the employment patterns in the stores, and to keep tight control over hours worked at all times. Edina's labor costs as a percentage of sales are presently 1 to 3 percent higher than comparable liquor stores. Figure 3 shows Edina at 10% compared to an average of about 8 to 9% for the seven other metro cities. The lowest rate ob- served is 5 %. . TARGET III. Improve management of inventory and costs of sales. The City's policy is that the liquor stores are service facilities, not liquor wholesale warehouses. As the data above indicates, Columbia Heights is a more profitable operation than Edina. The reason is that Columbia Heights conducts a liquor warehouse type of business. Of course service levels are also substantially lower. Edina, with a sincere emphasis on service, will never enjoy some of the cost savings City of Edina City Manager's Report: Liquor Stores available to wholesale liquor operations. However, Edina can substantially im- prove cost management in two ways, both of which rely upon our data processing system, LOGIS. The two areas in need of improvement are inventory control and pricing. More effective use of LOGIS is key to better management of inventory control and pricing. LOGIS receives daily input from all cash registers in Edina's liquor stores and provides detailed monthly reports documenting the stores' financial activities. Because this particular service has been under development and could not be relied upon for day -to -day decisions, the City has not used the data provided to the best advantage., However, through the City's initiative of working with LOGIS and a consultant, we are achieving a level of sophistication that will produce a useful and productive management tool. Improved management of inventory con- trol and pricing alone could produce a minimum of 2% in gross profits which would in turn increase net profits from 6% to 8 %. ASPECT 2. WORTH OF LIQUOR OPERATION key factor in determining the ad- ' 'visability of selling the liquor stores in- volves calculating the amounts the City could receive under ,two scenarios: *Sale of the business as a going concern 3 *Sale of the properties and liquidation of inventory To that end, two independent profes- sional appraisers were hired to evaluate the properties. The first appraiser, Sandy Graving with Adams and Associates., spe- cialized the value of liquor store busi- nesses. The challenge given was to assess the value of the three liquor stores, as liq- uor stores, independent of real estate value and inventory. The ranges for the three stores are as follows: 50th street: $75,000 - 100,000 Yorkdale: $225,000 - 250,000 Grandview: $275,000 - 300,000 Totals $575,000 - 650,000 Source: Adams & Associates The second appraiser, Craig Johnson CMB, MAI, was asked to appraise the property independent of its use as a liq- uor store (Mr. Johnson has done other work for the City and the HRA and con- sidered a very competent appraiser). The approach used to estimate present market value was the "Economic Approach ".Fun - damental to this approach was estimating the present market rent for each of the ap- praised properties. Key assumptions that he used were as follows: .Rents are projected on a net basis with all operating expense passed through to the tenants; .A vacancy allowance of 5% is con- sidered appropriate recognizing space demand in these locations; City of Edina City Manager's Report: Liquor Stores 95013 Vernon has excess land; this par- cel - a rear parking and loading area - is estimated to have a separate value of $6.00 SF, or (rounded): $150,000;and .Capitalization rate: considering current interest rates and anticipated equity dividend on net leased properties, an overall rate of 10% is considered ap- propriate; this is subject to tenant evaluation, terms of lease, etc. Property 6801 York 5013 Vernon 3939 W. 50th SF Area 6,394 4,100 4,286 Bsmt Area 6,394 4,100 4,286 SF Rent Main $10.00 $8.00 $13.00 SF Rent Bsmt $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 Total Rent P/A (Gross Income) $76,728 $419000 $64,290 Less Vacancy: 3.836 2.050 -1,215 Effective Gross: $72,892 $38,950 $61,075 Less Exp. Items: I SR 1,610 1 714 Net Oper. Inc.: $70,334 $37,300 $59,359 Capitalized Value: $703,340 $373,000 $593,590 Aftexcessland: ilia 105.000 n/a Value indicated: ,$Z= SIB= S_595 5000 Total - $1,775,000 Source: Craig Johnson C.M.B.,M.A.I. The average inventory at cost that the City of Edina liquor stores maintain is ap- proximately 600,000 dollars. With these facts now available to us we can now assume what the liquor stores are presently worth as a going concern. These estimates are also based on the premise that only three liquor stores would exist in the City after the sale and that the stores are sold for exclusive liq- uor store use. Taking the high estimates of the liquor store worth which totals $650,000, to this we add a total of $600,000 for inventory r� and we take the appraised value of the buildings which totalled $1,775,000 this gives us a grand total of $3,025,000. This money invested at a current rate of 7% would yield approximately $210,000. Real estate tax gain due to private owner- ship is approximately $9,800. This is figured on an effective tax rate of 4.5% of market value and the City's portion of that which is 12 %. Add this to the invest- ment income, the City would realize ap- proximately 200,000 dollars. This income is approximately 100,000 dollars below the level that we are making.. - The values of each store could tend to lead ones thoughts to sell one or more, but not all. This will be discussed in the recommendations. ASPECT 3. SOCIAL CONSIDERATIONS The social impacts of retaining or selling the City's liquor business are naturally somewhat subjective and open to personal opinion. Edina's policy restricting advertising of the liquor stores was adopted several years ago. At the time it was felt that the City's promotion of the liquor stores could conflict with support of programs dealing with chemical dependency. During this period, Operation Charlie, a local chemical dependency education or- ganization, was forming, as was the City's Chemical Advisory Committee of the Human Relations Commission. The City, sensitive to its responsibilities, especially City of Edina City Manager's Report: Liquor Stores regarding alcohol abuse, did not want to encourage consumption by traditionally advertising, but rather desired to build its image as a service entity. National trends during this period reflected increased concern about drunken driving (which led to the forma- tion of MADD -- Mothers Against Drunk Driving, and other national anti -drunk driving groups), and an increased em- phasis on physical fitness. From 1980 to 1985 these trends actually depressed con- sumption of hard liquor from 6 to 18 %. Nobody would argue with the social benefits of decreased alcohol abuse, but these trends, coupled with the City's no- advertising policy, are having negative ef- fects on gross sales and potential additional income for City operations. The next section of this report presents some of the legal considerations that must be examined by the Council in order to determine whether to stay in the liquor business. One of these, however, is dis- cussed here because it has real social ramifications. The City attorney has ad- vised that although the Council can limit the total number of off -sale liquor licen- ses issued to private parties, the Council cannot control how private stores are operated, marketed, or advertised other than to require compliance with state and national laws. In other words, if the three liquor stores were sold and licensed, a private party could operate three low - cost, high - volume wholesale -like liquor warehouses -- effectively destroying the service basis under which the City's stores presently. operate. Another concern relates to potentially onerous and expensive enforcement problems. Currently, the City exercises effective controls over the procedures fol- 5 lowed by all liquor sales staff and requires strict adherence to proper legal practices. Those procedures governing sale of liq- uor to minors are monitored especially closely. This control is effectively main- tained without active involvement of the police department. Almost inevitably, however, the City could expect a private operation to place more responsibility on the police department thereby imposing higher labor costs on the department and the City. ASPECT 4. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS The City attorney was asked to submit answers to questions regarding the sale of the liquor stores. The following points summarize these answers. .The City can discontinue its liquor store operations by a resolution of the City Council. .The City can sell the liquor stores by a resolution. Such sale can be by negotia- tion and public bidding is not required. .The City Council may issue as many off - sale licenses as the Council determines and may charge a maximum of $200 per license. Anyone buying the liquor stores must ac- quire appropriate off -sale liquor licenses from the City Council. These licenses can City of Edina City Manager's Report: Liquor Stores be issued without an election. If, however, 200 residents request an elec- tion, the Minnesota "Local Option Elec- tion" statute requires that one be held. If this election goes against the issuance of off -sale liquor licenses, all presently held off -sale licenses could not be renewed and no further licenses could be issued. Should this occur, the City could be ex- posed to possible liability. In addition, buyers' awareness of the "Local Option Election" statute could suppress the sales price of the stores. An agreement not to license competitors may result in liability to the City under state and federal anti -trust laws. There- fore, it would not be prudent to promise a buyer that the City would restrict issuance of licenses to competitors. ASPECT V. ENHANCING THE IMAGE OF THE LIQUOR STORES If the City Council determines not to remove itself from the liquor business, the following steps could be taken to strengthen the liquor stores image in the community as well as provide a valuable public service regarding chemical abuse. The Edina Liquor Stores are in the uni- que position of creating an innovative niche in the Liquor Industry. A strong op- portunity now exists to gain favorable at- tention and at the same time, increase sales in a positive manner. A campaign with a focused message is needed. However, with a growing concern D regarding the issue of drinking and driv- ing in our community, the most effective way to reach our audiences with an image rather than a hard -sell campaign. An image campaign implemented in Edina and its surrounding communities would create positive feelings among potential consumers toward The Edina Liquor Stores. Consumers would believe The Edina Liquor Stores care about its cus- tomers in a nonprofit- oriented way, dif- ferentiating The Edina Liquor Stores from the competition. These positive feelings then translate into sales. When the consumer needs to buy liquor, beer or wine, they will go to The Edina Liquor Stores because they already have a posi- tive image of the stores. To build upon the loyal customer follow- ing, the campaign should remain focused around Edina, surrounding suburbs and Southdale shoppers. This way we can build a steady, loyal clientele, who due to their positive feelings toward The Edina Liquor Stores will not be swayed to shop at the discount stores. By showing the community that The Edina Liquor Stores care about people and not just as a market to sell, potentially, a mutual sup- port system can be created between the stores and the consumers. This personal relationship will keep customers coming back. To address the potential conflict of liquor sales versus support of local chemical abuse agencies, the City needs to stress the fact that the campaign is image oriented, and the creative strategy focuses on using alcohol carefully and not abusing it so that it can hurt one's self or others. Sales become a result of a positive, responsible level of alcohol consumption among consumers who are currently pur- chasing a variety of alcoholic beverages. City of Edina City Manager's Report: Liquor Stores The main message is a concern for the community. The fact that any profit made by The Edina Liquor Stores is reinvested into the community presents us with another op- portunity. This information could be used as a creative strategy and to gain sup- port and endorsement of the community for the stores which is extremely impor- tant for the continuing success of the stores. The Edina Liquor Stores could sponsor an educational program on alcohol and its effects in the local high schools. The program could emphasize the dangers of drinking and driving and taking respon- sibility for one's own life as well as others, rather than giving a lecture on not drink- ing. Teens that have been through such an accident could be brought in as speakers to increase the reception of such a program by the students. There are other programs that could be introduced to the public all of which would have an educational focus regard- ing chemical abuse and appropriate use of alcoholic beverages. In other words we will sell for profit but not to the detriment of our citizens. RECOMMENDATION This report may lead one to different con- clusions. However, my recommendation is to retain the liquor stores and to implement the suggestions made in this report to achieve a net profit of 10 %. 7 •, r This recommendation is based upon four factors: *The stores are worth more to the City as going businesses than as taxable proper- ty. That is to say the net worth of the stores substantially exceeds any proceeds that could be realized through sale at this time. .All stores are profitable. None show los- ses. City of Edina City Manager's Report: Liquor Stores .We are poised to substantially improve the usefulness of the LOGIS liquor management system. .Although the 50th Street store shows somewhat disappointing income, retain- ing an off -sale presence in the 50th and France area insures that competition (uncontrollable by the City) will think twice before locating nearby. If such competition should occur, it could nega- tively impact sales at the Grandview Store instead of helping them. L-*1 PUBLIC HEARING CABLE TV AGENDA ITEM VI. MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Members of the Edina City Council Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager. From: Thomas S. Erickson Date: November 17, 1988 Re: Cable Television On Monday, November 21, 1988 the City Council will be asked to take action on a number of matters involving the cable operator and operations for the five southwestern communities (the "Cities "). Those actions are summarized as follows: 1. Resolution extending time to comply with requirements to complete the transfer of the Franchise to Rogers Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. ( "Franchisee "). a. The transfer of,the franchise was previously approved by all of the Cities. (It was approved by Edina on July 11, 1988.) Obtaining final execution of the final documents required in connection with that approval has taken longer than the prior approvals allowed. Therefore, there is need for an extension.. 2. Resolution authorizing a public hearing by SWSCC on November 30, 1988 to review the transfer of stock of Rogers Communications, Inc. (the parent corporation of Franchisee) to KBL Cable, Inc., a Texas corporation. a. The.SWSCC will hold this public hearing for all Cities and make a recommendation to the Cities as to whether to allow the stock transfer. 3. Resolution approving the SWING report relative to enhance- ment of the Residential CATV network. a. The total cost of enhancement will be paid one -half by the Franchisee, and one -half by the Cities up to a maximum of $17,660.50. 4. Approval of settlement with Franchisee. a. The approval is to be done by (i) adoption of a resolution approving the Stipulation of Settlement And Release and (ii) adoption of an Ordinance amending CATV Relief Ordinance No. 1121. ti 1 1 b. Summary of Settlement: (i) The Cities will be paid $3.5 million (U.S.). Edina's share is 25 %. (ii) The annual franchise fee goes from 3% to 5% of gross revenues. (iii) The Cities waive the right to purchase the CATV system prior to the sale to KBL Cable, Inc. (iv) The Cities release the provision terminating the Relief Ordinance upon sale of the CATV System. (v) Waiver by Cities of cost reimbursement in excess of amounts paid. (vi) Completion by Franchisee of enhancement of Residential Network per SWING Report, with Cities paying 1/2 up to $17,600.50. C. Contingencies to Settlement: (i) Adoption of similar resolution approval by all Cities within 45 days. (ii) Adoption of CATV Relief Ordinance Amendment by all Cities. (iii) Adoption of Amendment to Performance Agreement by all Cities. (iv) Closing of stock transfer to KBL Cable, Inc. within 6 months (extendable by Franchisee or SWSCC for additional 6 months). VI.A RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR THE EXECUTION OF TRANSFER DOCUMENTS , WHEREAS, the City of Edina , Minnesota ( "City ") has granted a cable television franchise (the "Franchise ") to Rogers Cablesystems of Minnesota Limited Partnership (" RCMLP") pursuant to the City's cable communications ordinance (the "Franchise Ordinance "); and WHEREAS, Rogers Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. ( "RCTSI") is the sole general partner of RCMLP and is a wholly - owned subsidiary of Rogers U.S. Cablesystems, Inc. ("RUSCI"), which is a wholly -owned subsidiary of Rogers Cablesystems of America, Inc. ( "RCA ") (collectively hereinafter referred to as "Rogers Companies "); and WHEREAS,.on or about July 11, 1988 ,' the City, pursuant to Resolution approved the transfer of the franchise from RCMLP to RCTSI; and WHEREAS, the approval of the transfer considered in Resolution is conditioned on the filing by RCTSI of necessary documents in conformance with the requirements in Article XIV, Section 2, of the Franchise Ordinance; and WHEREAS, due to matters arising from the sale.of RCA Cablesystems Holding Co.; there is a need to extend the time for execution and filing of the documents required by Resolution; and WHEREAS, RCTSI acknowledges that the Stipulation of Settlement and Release approved by the SWSCC and submitted for approval to its Member Cities shall be binding on RCMLP; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: The City hereby consents to the extension of time for filing documents required by Section A of Resolution as follows: That the Acceptance Agreement containing the requirements set forth in Article XIV, Section 2 of the Franchise Ordinance will be executed and filed with the City on or before March 1, 1989. Passed and adopted this day of the City of Edina . DATED: City of Edina By ATTEST: Its Mayor 1988, by City Clerk RESOLEDI /SW2 I V 1.17 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A JOINT PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION ON A PROPOSED TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP RELATING TO THE CABLE COMMUNICATIONS FRANCHISE FOR THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina ( "City ") is the official governing body of the City; and, WHEREAS, the City, in association with the Cities of Eden Prairie Hopkins , Minnetonka and Richfield ( "Member Cities ") formed the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission ("SWSCC"), a joint powers commission; and, WHEREAS, the City, in association with the other Member Cities, granted a Cable Communications Franchise ( "Franchise ") to Rogers Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. ( "Rogers "); and, WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 238.081, Subdivision 5, authorizes the City to delegate authority vested in it to grant, administer, and enforce the Franchise; and, WHEREAS, Article XIII, Section 3, of the Franchise authorizes the City to delegate from time to time certain rights or obligations under the Franchise to the SWSCC; and, WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 238.083 provides that a public hearing may be held in the event of a proposed transfer of ownership of the Franchise; and, WHEREAS, Rogers has proposed a transfer of ownership to KBL Cable, Inc. of the Grantee of the Franchise through the transfer of the controlling stock interest in an indirect parent corporation of the Grantee; and, WHEREAS, the City, in cooperation with the other Member Cities, wishes to hold a joint public hearing to consider the proposed transfer of ownership pertaining to the Franchise; and, WHEREAS, the SWSCC through its Operating Committee has recommended to the City and the Member Cities-that a joint public hearing relating to this proposed transfer of ownership be held on behalf of all Member Cities on November 30, 1988, before the SWSCC at the Edina City Hall beginning at 7:00 p.m.; and, WHEREAS, legal public notice of said public hearing shall be published inviting any interested person to discuss the legal, technical and financial qualifications and character of the proposed transferee; and, WHEREAS, this public hearing and legal notice shall be in satisfaction of all state and local public hearing requirements related to the proposed transfer of ownership. NOW, THEREFORE, in a regular meeting assembled of the City Council of the City of Edina F the following was resolved: 1. The SWSCC is requested on behalf of the City, in cooperation with the other Member Cities, to hold a joint public hearing on the proposed transfer of ownership of the Franchise on November 30, 1988. 2. Legal notice of this hearing will be published by the SWSCC pursuant to the requirements of state and local law. 3. All interested persons in the City who wish to attend or participate in the public hearing on the proposed transfer of - 2 - 4. IV I ownership of the Franchise are asked to attend the joint public hearing on November 30, 1988. 4. The foregoing notice of public hearing and public hearing shall satisfy all state and local requirements pertaining to this proposed transfer of ownership of the Franchise. This Resolution is passed and adopted the day of SW2 11/4/88 . 1988. CITY OF Edina The Mayor - 3 - VIX SUMMARY OF THE SOUTHWEST INSTITUTIONAL NETWORK GROUP'S STUDY OF THE VIABILITY OF THE INSTITUTIONAL NETWORK IN THE SOUTHWEST SUBURBS During relief negotiations with Rogers Cablesystems, Inc., in 1985, the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission (SWSCC) agreed to temporarily relieve Rogers of their obligation to provide a 166 -mile institutional network throughout the Southwest suburbs providing 472 channels for video, voice and data transmission. The relief of this obligation was hinged on the formation of a study group to evaluate the viability of such a network in the area. The Performance Agreement of 1985 set out guidelines for the establishment of the study group, along with membership guidelines and the parameters of their study and report. In the Spring of 1987, the SWSCC and Rogers sought representatives from the community to serve on the study group named the Southwest Institutional Network Group ( "SWING "). SWING was made up of four appointees selected by the Commission and four appointees selected by Rogers. The Chairperson was named by the Cable Commission. The membership was made up of representatives from the cable industry, telecommunications industry and the school district. It was staffed by both the Commission and Rogers. SWING began their study in August 1987 by reviewing the original franchise provisions, along with the structure of the institutional network and its applications. A large part of their charge involved assessment of the financial viability of building such a network. Therefore, SWING initially reviewed potential uses by area businesses and followed a process of meeting with and surveying Eden Prairie businesses on their voice, data and video transmission needs over the next five or so years. Eden Prairie was chosen due to its density of new businesses. Twenty -nine area businesses and institutions were contacted to attend an informational meeting on January 21, 1988, and were sent a survey to complete on their technology needs. Ten people representing nine organizations attended the informational session. Eight organizations returned a completed survey. The survey and presentation to interested businesses did not prove fruitful in demonstrating backing for such a network. At the SWING meeting in March 1988, a member of SWING who is also a member of the Educational Cable Coordinating Committee (ECCC), requested that a separate process be used to review institutional uses within the school districts before SWING made its recommendations to the Cable Commission. I -net Report September 16, 1988 Page 2 In response to this request, SWING developed a needs assessment survey and distributed it to the ECCC representative from each of the five school districts, Hennepin County Library and Intermediate District 287. The survey requested projected uses of the technology for the years 1988 -1995. The three -month process of SWING's staff working with the ECCC to assess their specific needs resulted in a joint presentation put together by Rogers Cablesystems and the ECCC to explain uses of the technology, associated options, and costs of providing such services to the SW school superintendents and SWING. Two of the six involved school superintendents attended the presentation, although all.had originally indicated an interest in attending on May 24, 1988. All representatives from the ECCC attended the presentation except the representative from the Hennepin County Library. The joint presentation included a description of the schools' need of the interactive classroom technology, along with an outline by Rogers of two options for meeting those needs. The first option involved expansion of the subscriber network to double the current capacity to all school institutions at a cost of $35,321. The second option, which had greater long -term use but limited the users to eight secondary schools, was a mini I- net at a cost of $643,691. Discussion occurred concerning variations of the options, as well as to compare the cable options with Northwestern Bell's recent proposal to the school districts. The SWING committee convened two more times to develop their recommendations to the SWSCC'based on their consideration of the viability of an institutional network. Their evaluation was based on a study of the applications of the technology, as well as potential interest in the technology by'revenue- generating users, as well as nonrevenue- generating users. SUMMARY OF SWING'S FINDINGS The Committee recognizes the unique limitations of coaxial cable I -net applications and the attendant marketing challenges. The following findings have been developed as a result of our study of the technology and economic feasibility of building and marketing an I -net in the SW franchise area: o The I -net applications discussed in the company's original proposal and included in the 1981 franchise document are I -net Report September 16, 1988 Page 3 largely obsolete. Some of the technologies were never developed as originally conceived. o Some telecommunications needs are better served by .alternative technologies which offer greater capacity, increased transmission speed and eliminate geographical limitations. o A survey of targeted Eden Prairie businesses and government agencies indicated minimal interest in the I -net and an unlikely near -term market among potential revenue - generating users. o There exists a strong interest among members of the Educational Cable Coordinating Committee to cablecast interactive classroom programming on a mini I -net connecting SW schools. However, among school district superintendents, there is no demonstrated commitment for capacity beyond that which may be provided on the residential network. .. o The Committee has been unable to identify any revenue - generating institutional users, either public or private, to support the building of an I -net. If the I -net were built today, it would be wholly- subsidized by the residential subscriber who would not realize any benefit to the residential network. The Committee, therefore, finds that the I -net is not economically feasible in today's market and in the foreseeable future. o The Committee identifies three costs: 1) a fully -built 166 - mile I -net at 3 -to 74 million dollars; 2) a 41 -mile mini I- net at $643,691; and 3) enhancement of the residential network for institutional uses by nonrevenue- generating public users at $35,321. o The company presently employs one full- time-sales engineer, 80% time - dedicated, to market institutional uses to companies in the Southwest and Minneapolis franchise area. Oversight is provided by the local Vice President of Engineering. In addition, the company employs a business network manager at its U.S. corporate level to assist local efforts in the development of I -net business. RECOMMENDATIONS OF SWING In consideration of its findings and charge, SWING made the following recommendations , to the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission: r I -net Report September 16, 1988 Page 4 1) The requirement to build an I -net in the should be deferred for a minimum of five time as a sizable base and secured to finance subscriber subsidy. of institutional SW franchise area years or until such users is identified the capital expense without cable 2) Future study of the telecommunications market and economic feasibility of the I -net should be at the Commission's discretion. 3) An enhancement of the residential network should be implemented in a 50% cost -split with the participating school districts with a maximum cost contribution by the cable company up to $17,660.50. By the addition of equipment at Rogers' headend, the subscriber network's current capacity for video conferencing applications will double. With the addition of equipment, not only can two channels be transmitted per city, but once received at the headend, they can be discreetly routed to one or more cities. This doubles the capacity for the school's interactive classroom use. This recommendation permits each district to make an independent decision to participate if so desired. Any additional modulators, cameras, televisions or other equipment that may be needed in the schools should be purchased by the school districts. This offer is good until September 1, 1993. PRESENTATION TO SWSCC AND SWSCC'S RECOMMENDATIONS TO MEMBER CITIES SWING presented their report and recommendations to the SWSCC Operating Committee and Full Commission in the Fall of 1988. The Full Commission, at their meeting on September 7, 1988, accepted SWING's first two recommendations and decided to amend the third recommendation concerning funding due to the fact that all institutional users benefit from the enhancement made to the subscriber network. It is not only a benefit to school districts, but also to the individual cities, as the doubling of capacity will permit the cablecasting of two live programs simultaneously from an individual city which has become of concern to the Member Cities. The SWSCC's recommendations to the Member Cities are as follows: 1) The requirement to build an I -net in the SW franchise area should be deferred for a minimum of five years or until such time as a sizable base of institutional users is identified and secured to finance the capital expense without cable subscriber subsidy. I -net Report September 16, 1988 Page 5 2) Future study of the telecommunications market and economic feasibility of the I -net should be at the Commission's discretion. 3) The SWSCC recommends that the enhancement of the residential network be implemented in a 50% cost share between the SWSCC and the cable company of the $35,321 amount. The Commission, by contributing $17,660.50, is making sure the enhancement is begun prior to transfer of the system and completed shortly thereafter as the ordering of equipment allows. In order to recoup some of the cost in the future from the school districts, requests for channel time on the government and public access channel will be negotiated at a cost to the school districts. The Commission recommends approval by Member Cities of its three recommendations, along with an authorization for the SWSCC to pay the $17,660.50 out of the relief settlement proceeds to be received from Rogers, contemplating future action by the city council on the settlement offer. If, for some reason, Member Cities do not approve the settlement offer of Rogers at an upcoming meeting, the enhancement will be paid in a proportionate amount out of city franchise fees. The SWSCC urges your acceptance of their recommendations, with the Commission's cash contribution to the project in order that the enhancement can proceed in a timely manner. Rogers Cablesystems has committed to completing the project as soon as all five Member Cities approve the Commission's recommendations. SW2 9/16/88 VI.D STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE This Stipulation of Settlement and Release ( "Stipulation ") is entered into this day of , 1988 by and between, the City of Edina , a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City "), and one of the Member Cities of the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission (the "SWSCC"), Rogers Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, ( "Grantee ") Grantee under the Franchise which was granted to it by City, Rogers Communications, Inc., ( "Rogers "), a Canadian corporation, Rogers Cablesystems of America, a Delaware corporation, and Rogers U.S. Cablesystems,, Inc., a Delaware corporation, guarantors of,Grantee (herein together called "Rogers Subsidiaries "). WHEREAS, Rogers has agreed to sell all interests and holdings in its U.S. cable systems; and WHEREAS, Rogers and the City agree that KBL Cable, Inc., a Texas corporation ( "Proposed Transferee ") should assume all Rogers' responsibilities and liabilities related to the Franchise on and after the close of transfer ( "Closing "); and WHEREAS, the transfer from Rogers to Transferee shall be effectuated through the transfer of the controlling stock interest in RCA Cablesystems Holding Co., the parent corporation of Grantee; and WHEREAS, while the Grantee of the Franchise shall remain the same, Proposed Transferee shall on and after closing of the transfer of ownership from Rogers to Proposed Transferee, guarantee all responsibilities and liabilities relating to Rogers and the Grantee and Rogers shall be released and discharged from all responsibilities and liabilities for its actions and the actions of the Grantee occurring on or after such Closing; and, WHEREAS, the City understands that Grantee and Rogers agree that the terms of this Stipulation shall not be effective unless the Proposed Transferee enters into a guarantee agreement on or before the time of Closing guaranteeing Grantee's performance of the Franchise as amended, this Stipulation, the CATV Relief Ordinance as amended, the Performance Agreement as amended, and compliance with the acceptance-terms of the Franchise; and WHEREAS, Rogers has requested that the City extend the terms of the CATV Relief Ordinance as amended by Exhibit CC approved by City and other Member Cities of the SWSCC to Proposed Transferee after the Closing; and 1 WHEREAS, in consideration of the extension of the CATV Relief Ordinance, Rogers has made an offer, included in a letter dated August 18, 1988, and attached hereto as Exhibit AA; and WHEREAS, it is intended by the acceptance of Exhibit AA by City that continuation of the relief provided for under the terms of the CATV Relief Ordinance as amended by Exhibit CC will continue after the Closing based upon the following Exhibits being complied with by Grantee, Rogers and Proposed Transferee: Exhibit BB - Proposed Resolution Exhibit CC - Proposed CATV Relief Ordinance Amendment Exhibit DD - Proposed Amendment to Performance Agreement; WHEREAS, in consideration of payment to the SWSCC in the sum of $3.5 Million (U.S.), City, along with other Member Cities of the SWSCC, agree to the approval of Exhibits BB, CC and DD, and agree that the waiver or deferral of certain Franchise requirements shall be approved and that Rogers and the Grantee shall be relieved of any further liability or responsibility for completion thereof; and WHEREAS, upon compliance by Grantee of all of the terms and conditions of this Stipulation and the attached Exhibits, the payment of $3.5 Million (U.S.) by Rogers to SWSCC, and, upon execution between the parties of this Stipulation and Exhibit DD, the relief provided for by City to Grantee in the CATV Relief Ordinance as amended by Exhibit CC and Exhibit DD will be continued after the Closing; and WHEREAS, Rogers seeks a release from liability under the Franchise by City, effective upon the date of transfer to Proposed Transferee. WHEREAS, the City and Grantee make the following acknowledgements: 1. By City: As of the date of this Stipulation and except for the waivers and deferrals provided for in this Stipulation, City has found, that to the best of its knowledge, Grantee is not in violation of the Franchise; 2. By City and Grantee: As set forth in Article XII, Section 5, and Article XIV, Section 2B, of the Franchise, any previous, current or future deferral or failure of the City to enforce prompt compliance with all provisions in the Franchise does not constitute a waiver of the City's rights or obligations to enforce compliance in the future; further this provision does not relieve the Grantee and the Proposed Transferee of any obligations they have to comply with all provisions of the Franchise, except as such obligations are amended, waived, or extended by this Stipulation and the CATV Relief Ordinance as 2 amended. Upon transfer of ownership and control of Grantee by the stock purchase to the Proposed Transferee, the City shall again be entitled to enforce prompt compliance of any obligation and any deferral or failure to enforce the then existing obligations by the City shall not constitute a waiver of the City's rights or remedies; and 3. By Grantee: That Grantee is not, to the best of its knowledge and except for the waivers and deferrals provided for in this Stipulation, in violation of any of the terms or conditions of the Franchise and all requirements of the Franchise are being complied with except as identified by this Stipulation. NOW, THEREFORE, based on the foregoing mutual agreement and negotiated settlement between the Grantee, Rogers and City and upon compliance by Grantee and Rogers of all of the terms and conditions of this Stipulation, it is hereby mutually agreed that: 1. In consideration of the Proposed Transferee's guarantee of Grantee's performance which includes the execution and delivery of the agreement pursuant to paragraph 5 of this Stipulation and'in consideration of payment by Rogers of $3.5' Million (U.S.) in immediately available U.S. funds, wired to the SWSCC account, First Bank Minneapolis, Account No. 602 -3377- 564, for the benefit of its.Member Cities, at the Closing between Rogers and its Proposed Transferee, City agrees to the following: a. Continue after the Closing in accordance with the terms of the CATV Relief Ordinance as amended, evidenced by Exhibit CC and the Performance Agreement as amended as exhibited by Exhibit DD, to the Proposed Transferee of Grantee; b. The- "Waiver of completion of the minor Franchise offerings" as set forth in Exhibit.EE hereto; C. Deferral for negotiation with the Proposed Transferee regarding compliance with liability insurance requirements of the Franchise; d. Waiver of its right to review for purchase by City and right to purchase the cable system prior to transfer of control of Grantee of Franchise to Proposed Transferee; and, e. Waiver of reimbursement for costs in connection with the Stipulation in excess of the amount paid to the SWSCC by Grantee and Rogers. 2. Rogers and Grantee shall complete enhancement of the 3 Residential Network as described in the report of the Southwest Institutional Network Group ( "SWING "). The cost in implementing the SWING recommendation is approximately $34,000.00, of which one - half, but not.in excess of $17,660.50, shall be paid by all Member Cities. Rogers shall pay the total cost initially, and the Member Cities' portion of the cost shall be repaid to Rogers at the time of the payment of the $3.5 Million (U.S.) on condition Grantee complete this work prior to the Closing with Proposed Transferee. If this work is not completed at the time of Closing, the amount to be paid by the Member Cities shall be held in escrow by SWSCC at the Closing and distributed when Grantee completes the work. 3. This Stipulation shall be effective only if the City and all Member Cities of the SWSCC have approved it and its Exhibits, and each are accepted by Grantee and Rogers. The terms Of this Stipulation shall be effective for six (6) months from the final date of passage by all five Member Cities of a resolution approving settlement, and may be extended by either Grantee or SWSCC for an additional six (6) months without further consideration. Upon payment by Rogers of the $3.5 million (U.S.) described in paragraph 1 of this Stipulation and as a condition of approval of the transfer of ownership and control of Grantee to Proposed Transferee, Grantee and Proposed Transferee shall hold harmless City, SWSCC, and Member Cities on and after Closing of the transfer from any liability or responsibility with respect to the sale or transfer of ownership of the cable communications system and the Franchise of the.City to Proposed Transferee. On and after the transfer from Rogers to Proposed Transferee, Proposed Transferee shall guarantee and Grantee shall assume any and all then existing responsibilities and liabilities related to the Franchise, the CATV Relief Ordinance, the CATV Relief Ordinance Amendment, the Performance Agreement, as amended, the Contract for Local Programming Activities between SWSCC and Grantee, including Rogers' responsibilities and liabilities, and the City, SWSCC and Member Cities shall release and discharge Rogers and Grantee from any and all responsibilities, liabilities, claims and disputes, known and unknown, related to the Franchise and Grantee. 4. If the conditions of this Stipulation are not satisfied because of actions by Rogers, Grantee or Proposed Transferee, Grantee and Rogers agree to reimburse the City and SWSCC for all expenses over and above amounts previously paid, by Rogers and /or Grantee in connection with this Stipulation and also agree to be continuously bound by the terms of the existing Franchise, the CATV Relief Ordinance, the Performance Agreement, the Contract for Local Programming Activities, the Acceptance Agreement and Agreement of Joint and Several Liability both given in connection with the transfer of the Franchise to,Grantee. 5. This Stipulation and all of its Exhibits shall be null and void and shall not be effective, unless Proposed Transferee N enters into a guarantee agreement on or before the time of Closing of transfer of ownership from Rogers to Proposed Transferee agreeing to guarantee Grantee's performance of the Franchise as amended, this Stipulation, the CATV Relief Ordinance as amended, and the Performance Agreement as amended, and unless the Proposed Transferee complies with the terms of Article XIV of the Franchise. The foregoing was agreed to and entered into between the Grantee, Rogers, and City on the day of , 1988. SW3 /STIPUL2.SW - 11/7/88 City of Edina Mayor City Manager ROGERS CABLESYSTEMS OF THE SOUTHWEST, INC., a Minnesota corpora ' By T, • Its ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Canadian orporatAon By j, Its ROGERS U.S. CABLESYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware rporat' n By J Its ROGERS CABLESYSTEMS OF AMERICA, INC., a D are co rati q1L."(4 By Its 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this day of , 19 , by , the Mayor of the CITY OF - , a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of said corporation. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this day of , 19 , by , the City Manager of the CITY OF , a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of said corporation. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this F 07 day of 19_LL, by /lr %�i7 /-S• ziY '<r , �/� the of ROGERS CABLESYSTEMS OF THE SOUTHWEST, INC., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of said core ration. (j� Notary Public 0 aaaAA"AA"""4" "AAAAA4A &A4AA X ,:sa:•. LEEANN K. PETERSON eft r- m NOTARY PUBLIC h;I,. SJ1A 5 4 � a. HENNEPIN COUtJIY STATE OF MINNESOTA), -` My Commission Expires Feb. 7, 1559 ; ss sta�rnerv�''�e�tro��awGV� COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to befo e me this ; �W'7 day of �/G� %'� ;'1f�`'G� 19 � i , by !� /•ir%;) <j. C� v17, the �`,', , 1 '•t,r' /�r r. ,(i` �'; t/of ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. a 'Canadian corporation, on behalf of said corporation. Notary Public �XAAAAAAAAAAAA/nAAAAAAftA AAAAA&AAAAAAAa LEEANN K. PETERSON 6 �:�!`•;;,. NOTARY PUBLIC - MiN'i'l':SOTA :�._� ,:t a ,,�. r ly ExJ IVY CC.I mission rc.3 Feb. 7, 1Sc5 STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this RLI, day of A10vev)-?i'6-- 190 , by Ljk.,Vt the (, '(.Ie of ROGERS CABLESYSTEMS OF AMERICA INC. a Delaware corporation, on behalf of STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) said corporation. Notary Public XAAAAA"&AAA\AAAA4AA"$\AA AAA I.\kAA4&4\AX 1> LEEANN K. PETERSON NOTARY PLIDLIC - MINW SOTA HENN P!'N" C-OU-Jy My COMMISS.'on Expires Feb. 7, 1989 The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this G day of 19 &C, by /?). , the of ROGERS U.S. CABLESYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, on behalf of said corporation. ljo$tary Public XAAAA&AA"&aAAAAAA AAAAAAAA, AAA&A,44"X LCEANNK. PETERSON NOTARY PU"LIC - MINNESOTA HENNEP!N COUNTY MY COMMiss;on Expires Feb 7 1989 SW3/STIPUL.SW - 10/20/88 r EXHIBIT [» Rcg�►s cEj))1:"_1 Cable I V Au�c�t at 1335 Adr in y r"mz : is 'i'::L? L70. 9 �0 Nc•- th, anal Plaza J j',3Z� 7►d�j.�f,1 �, LL ; ;;� rza-c:.sS to L c�..., a:lt c;,M_s3'cz. r =s= This 1a6. -a- -� c Suhu C - rhz c 1 rcT�5�i C. ?y :C 19soi a: d ft.ys?��a CG.:�i.,,aa C. ,� &r 'YOM vu}Y Si lS�i. G1YOM :_�A CJ p_ a .c tt:c3� C. Js_j �+ r+ !� �+ n /� � t-�=e p g? ? sf AAA: }o:;ar. � ' �..a C: _,. ;- -; SL.:iJS J. C.. a� � `i1.-r Aw l r Q? � Va ��3i.:�.. `�li ii� 1 �.�� C��Z� .. ,r} sal, �;a rc:: F. _.. «••i1 C27" C: .'a a c�.-:itt3e a c.,L i s �, c� i� r_-.,. _ a� tc 5..,_: - Y L'3, -0:1 CL'. u;;as:3,,ar_dir.S c' vh?-t �.,� r.az::iaticns. //.. -� t / L l 1 . /►M �+ti.�..! ar ;ic7 I by all i'�i5 �'LO• �d e fec. jTV$ }r_•; r Ci �+.'� ��r 's8J gcu,ity gait 1.r ►L2 '- Ci CL:2- = "rC5d1 as ra "yer• ?::a det -ails y C� -- ay ; rarch!59 fte r--t, _aa�s u a a sa a_,;;ded, rvvan'es a::?' t. Q res' { o'_ AC::C'e.._ ir___ �uyar hlicatic; ;:'al l Vi?1 P-3311=4 C :c_ acca3t is r i.C. *Z c_.ias s �:i cc:t�::•_3 ' 1 1 c: "css rara-�as a _ •e i ..._., -.- _- a .;. tea �- 7_ ..__ -.., C_ S' _1Y 2rr•.Y• -_.. t:.fl lax C: 5=c yz r _va::_es a i 4 ! all ct::Qr aCC255, L.C. 1 c F�•. v: the a.... yri • 2 �:.... �v`.. 13."7 7 �~r i +aw Cf he 'I ►.; 1 {� Saa._. -�, c- all i �a� 2 6 ty 195 C h95 C_stres a.c3`s z7a t=3•:3: =r a: -, A -- r t-,- 3 Cit?as. c•a7.r}�1��7 �A19. ?�1C_ t` a t-_..tr."ic^ of t_I-c:. se cr r.Oj --Yar =c —_1-cs c.._ f. ?S.. Adrian 1;a3 e) ^3 I- ac �a,n._�_ tii' -1� 8- ` ^C"-,e::aed ��J 5►;_ v" ba C:mtinuca % t An- - 11 a`ai c i i a 5 : a vc lc ct'nd;sa ac^apt . 1. . t H ai iT rte.. � w+ } yt 1' aZ;Aa t; thQ �: c >ec:;�es ara. �i::L,..;� ..,_ ._v,av as sa , . _ �j 1 },"�Z" Mi Qabta I3�f b�+,JBi iJ-11 ruzziiad, 125 1 tic ni .a:. are �i: Z:.Ci a: T.:aliticati crs. he ay�,�c'a_a yct;_ it''_' 'k::s C. ara._n7 C;.�.o�. 's aaai;a tc e ra'_:,ic::sly c;,rcll,?'a V".1-45 ratty_ . :: - �_cYCSai i. i :.r. a� :c ....,7�.., vte r�! wiz Y -"-- i2i3aG' to L3 as ZCC��i3�IQ to Vta C:2i3��7 t,` -4 3 oi_ar Will 3 : 7'.:. va'= • 1 F.z_ �r rCZ Q=ent is it is nct accaYtaa c_ a i--z t_a,.aLar i�. r.�_ c1_ca3d. Ka, 8 all awa it ycu::es:onsv. Y au tr�1y � viCt P--3xiCcn ., Rac- 41ato--nr A! a;.rs var r VI.D.1 EXHIBIT BB RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SETTLEMENT WITH THE GRANTEE UNDER THE CITY'S CABLE COMMUNICATIONS FRANCHISE ORDINANCE REGARDING THE EXTENSION OF THE TERM OF THE CATV RELIEF ORDINANCE, BASED UPON CERTAIN MODIFICATIONS THEREOF, TO A PROPOSED TRANSFEREE OF THE FRANCHISE FOR THE CITY'S CABLE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina ( "City ") is the official governing body of City; and WHEREAS, City, in association with other cities, granted a Cable Communications Franchise to Rogers Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. ( "Grantee "); and WHEREAS, the City adopted the CATV Relief Ordinance No. 1121 in 1985 ("CATV Relief Ordinance "), providing for modifications of the requirements of the City's Cable Communications Franchise Ordinance ( "Franchise "); and WHEREAS, in approximately August 1988, Rogers Communications, Inc. ( "Rogers "), notified City and the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission ( "SWSCC"), a joint powers commission comprised of this City and the cities of Eden Prairie , Hopkins Minnetonka , and Richfield ( "Member Cities ") , of the fact that Rogers to sell all interest and holdings in its U.S. cable systems to KBL Cable, Inc., a Texas corporation ( "Proposed Transferee "); and WHEREAS, as part of Rogers' proposed sale of its U.S. cable systems, Rogers requested that the City extend the term of the CATV Relief Ordinance after the Closing; and WHEREAS, on behalf of this City and other Member Cities of the SWSCC, the SWSCC undertook an evaluation and study of the request of Rogers; and WHEREAS, after considerable study and negotiation, the SWSCC made a recommendation based upon the final offer of Rogers, which is included as Exhibit 1 to this Resolution as a Stipulation of Settlement and Release ( "Stipulation "); and WHEREAS, at a Commission September 7, 1988, the SWSCC and accept the conditions and of the CATV Relief Ordinance meeting of recommended er which an the SWSCC on that the City approve extension of the terms would be made; and 1 WHEREAS, the City has reviewed the recommendation of the SWSCC and the Stipulation and has.determined that an extension of the CATV Relief Ordinance as amended, in accordance with the requirements set forth in the Stipulation, is reasonable and acceptable to the City; and WHEREAS, the City understands that Grantee and Rogers agree that the terms of the Stipulation shall not be effective unless the Proposed Transferee enters into a Guarantee Agreement on,or before the time of Closing agreeing to guarantee Grantee's performance of the Franchise as amended, the Stipulation, the CATV Relief Ordinance as amended, the Performance Agreement as amended, and compliance with the acceptance terms of the Franchise; and WHEREAS, the City acknowledges that the SWSCC has incurred substantial expense in evaluating this proposed settlement, as set forth in the Stipulation. The City also has incurred expense in this process. Both the SWSCC and City must be paid for the expenses incurred. The City acknowledges that as part of the process undertaken by the SWSCC, the Grantee has paid monies towards such expenses incurred by SWSCC. The balance of such expenses of SWSCC and also the City will be paid from the funds paid pursuant to paragraph 7 below; and WHEREAS, the SWSCC has recommended that Rogers pay to it directly the proceeds of the settlement pursuant to the Stipulation and such monies be held by the SWSCC until the SWSCC is able to recommend the best use and distribution for and on behalf of each of the Member Cities; and WHEREAS, the City has determined that the Stipulation with its attached Exhibits and Resolution, shall not be effective until the sale and transfer by Rogers to the Proposed Transferee is completed. The terms of this Resolution shall not be effective until Grantee and Rogers have complied in full with the Resolution and satisfied all of the requirements of this Resolution, the Stipulation, the acceptance of modifications to the Performance Agreement, and the amendment to the CATV Relief Ordinance, as well as having closed with the Proposed Transferee. NOW, THEREFORE, in a regular meeting assembled of the City Council of the City of Edina , the following was resolved; 1) That the Stipulation with its exhibits, which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1, is hereby approved and the Mayor and City Manager are authorized to sign the same on behalf of City. 2 2) That the terms of this Resolution are contingent upon approval and adoption of the CATV Relief Ordinance Amendment and Amendment to Performance Agreement, which are attached to the Stipulation, by the City, other Member Cities of the SWSCC and the SWSCC. 3) That the terms of this Resolution shall be null and void if a similar Resolution is not approved by other Member Cities of the SWSCC within 45 days from the date of this Resolution. 4) That the terms of this Resolution shall be null and void unless Grantee and Rogers shall have signed the Stipulation and the Proposed Transferee guarantees the performance of the Grantee and satisfies the transfer requirements of the Franchise. 5) This Stipulation and all of its Exhibits shall be null and void and shall not be effective, unless Proposed Transferee enters into a guarantee agreement on or before the time of Closing of transfer of ownership from Rogers to Proposed Transferee agreeing to guarantee Grantee's performance of the Franchise as amended, this Stipulation, the CATV Relief Ordinance as amended, and the - Performance Agreement as amended, and unless the Proposed Transferee complies with the terms of Article XIV of the Franchise,; and 6) That if a Closing of the transfer by and between Rogers and Proposed Transferee does not occur within six (6) months, the terms of this Resolution shall be null and void. The 6 -month period commences when the last of the five Member Cities has given final approval to a similar resolution. The 6 -month period may be extended by either Grantee or SWSCC for an additional six (6) months without further.consideration. Notice of such extension must be done in writing and mailed to the last known address of each of the parties identified herein. The Closing shall also provide that the Proposed Transferee'of the Franchise shall agree to be bound by the terms in this Resolution and shall guarantee Grantee's performance of the Franchise, the CATV Relief Ordinance and Amendment to the CATV Relief Ordinance, the Stipulation and such other requirements as may be set forth in the resolution by the City approving the transfer to the Proposed Transferee. 7) The SWSCC is hereby authorized to collect the sum of $3.5 Million (U.S.) in immediately available U.S. funds wired by Rogers to the SWSCC account, First Bank Minneapolis, Account No. 602 - 3377 -564 at the time of the Closing between Rogers and its Proposed Transferee. The sum so collected by the SWSCC may be deposited in the 3 account of the SWSCC and invested in accordance with requirements applicable to municipalities. Within thirty (30) days after the $3.5 Million (U.S.) payment is deposited in the SWSCC account, the SWSCC shall accomplish the following: (a) The SWSCC is authorized to reimburse itself for its costs and expenses in connection with the Stipulation and not previously paid for by the Grantee and Rogers. (b) The SWSCC will reimburse to each of the Member Cities an advance payment made by the Member Cities to the SWSCC for expenses of the SWSCC in connection with this Stipulation. (c) The SWSCC will pay to Rogers or place the sums in escrow pursuant to Section 2 of the Stipulation, if required, the Cities' portion of costs for the enhancement of the subscriber network as identified in the Stipulation. (d), The balance of the $3.5 Million (U.S.) together with accrued interest will be disbursed by the SWSCC in accordance with paragraph 8 below. 8) Unless otherwise specifically authorized by resolution of all the Member Cities, the SWSCC shall distribute the balance of the proceeds to the Member Cities in accordance with the following distribution formula and City shall be responsible for its own costs and expenses in connection with this Stipulation out of its portion of the distribution: PROPORTIONAL DISTRIBUTION* Percent Eden Prairie 20.0% $ 700,000 Edina 25.0 875,000 Hopkins 10.0 350,000 Minnetonka 24.5 857,500 Richfield 20.5 717,500 TOTAL 100.0% $3,500,000 *Based on an average of each city's proportion of the total subscriber revenues for the 7 -year period of the Relief Agreement adjusted to reflect the fact that each city provides an equal contribution for a portion of the funding of the SWSCC. 4 The SWSCC shall review cable - related needs of the Member Cities and shall make its recommendations on the uses of the $3.5 Million (U.S.) proceeds prior to the Closing between Grantee and the Proposed Transferee. The Member Cities shall have the opportunity for consideration and approval. Consideration of such recommendations shall not delay distribution of such balance to the Member Cities. This Resolution is passed and adopted the day of , 1988. SW3 /RESOL2.SW - 11/7/88 5 CITY OF Edina . Mayor VI. D.2 EXHIBIT CC ORDINANCE NO. 1121 -A1 An Ordinance Amending CATV Relief Ordinance, Ordinance No. 1121 ., Providing Modifications in Contemplation of a Transfer of Ownership of the City's Cable Communications Franchise and Permitting Continuance of Relief to the Transferee of the Franchise in Accordance with this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Edina follows: Section 1. Short Title. ordains as This Ordinance shall be known as the "CATV Relief Ordinance Amendment." Section 2. Background and Purpose. Rogers Communications, Inc. ( "Rogers ") has agreed to sell all interests and holding in its U.S. cable systems to KBL Cable, Inc., a Texas corporation ( "Proposed Transferee "). The transfer from Rogers to the Proposed Transferee shall be effectuated through the transfer of the controlling stock interest in RCA Cablesystems Holding Co., the parent corporation of the Grantee. The City previously granted relief to the Grantee under the Franchise by Ordinance known as the CATV Relief Ordinance. Rogers has requested relief from the Franchise to be extended after the Closing, irrespective of the requirement in the CATV Relief Ordinance that the CATV Relief Ordinance terminates upon transfer of ownership and control of Grantee of the Franchise to a new owner. The Southwest Suburban Cable Commission ("SWSCC") has reviewed the request of Rogers and recommended extending certain portions of the CATV Relief Ordinance to a proposed new owner. This recommendation is based upon compliance with certain conditions by the Grantee and acceptance of requirements including this Ordinance, by the Proposed Transferee of the Franchise. A Stipulation of Settlement with Rogers and Grantee, Exhibit A ( "Stipulation ") and a Resolution of Approval of Settlement, Exhibit B ( "Resolution "), are attached. The Stipulation and Resolution provide a description of requirements and conditions and are made part of this Ordinance by reference. This Ordinance will be effective only if the Stipulation and Resolution are satisfied and Proposed Transferee agrees to be 1 bound by the terms of this Ordinance as part of its acceptance of the transfer of the ownership of Grantee. Section 3. That Section 4 of the Relief Ordinance is hereby amended to read as follows: SECTION 4. DEFINITIONS. Subdivision 1. The definitions in the Franchise also apply to this ordinance. Subdivision 2. In addition, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings given them: [(1) "Existing indebtedness" means an $18,000,000 loan made to Grantee to Toronto Dominion Bank of Toronto, Canada under.loan documents dated April 1, 1982.] (11) [(2)] "Franchise" means the Cable Communications Ordinance as now or hereafter amended. __ [(3)] "Local Programming Obligations" means, for the purpose of this ordinance, Grantee's obligations under the Franchise and the Offering for cablecast access, community access and local origination programming. (3) [(4)] "Performance Agreement" means a contractual agreement between Grantee, City and SWSCC providing a means for monitoring Grantee's financial condition, assuring an adequate level of local programming, and providing for certain other matters related to Grantee's requested relief[.] as amended. Section 4. That Section 5 of the CATV Relief Ordinance is amended to read as follows: SECTION 5. RELIEF GRANTED. While this Ordinance is in effect the obligations of Grantee are modified to the extent provided in this section. Subdivision 1. Franchise Fees - Percentage. Until the effective date of this Ordinance, the annual franchise fee shall be 3% of gross revenues. Commencing with [Grantee's fiscal year 1985] the effective date of this ordinance the annual �A franchise fee is [reduced from] 5% of Gross Revenues [to 3 %]. Such annual fees shall be paid to City in equal quarterly payments on or before the first day of each of the months of November, February, May and August next following the end of Grantee's fiscal year. [If this ordinance terminates during any of Grantee's fiscal years, the franchise fee shall be restored to the rate of 5% of Gross Revenues at the end of the calendar month in which termination occurs. The restored rate of 5% and the reduced rate of 3% shall be applied respectively to the Gross Revenues collected only in the months during which each rate was in effect. The fees accruing at the restored rate shall be paid in accordance with the terms of the Franchise. The fees accruing at the reduced rate shall be paid in equal quarterly installments in accordance with the terms of this ordinance.] [Subd. 2. Past Due Franchise Fees. The 1984 franchise fee in the amount of $57,253 payable on or before November 1, 1984 shall be deemed fully discharged and paid if, but only if, Grantee pays the sum of $34,352 to the City, in four equal payments on or before June 1, June 15, August 15 and October 15, 1985.] Subd. [3.] 2 Letters of Credit. The City Council may by resolution reduce the required amount of the Letter of Credit below $50,000 if in its sole discretion it determines that a lesser amount is reasonable and adequate to protect the public. It may thereafter, by resolution, require the amount of the Letter of Credit to be increased or fully restored to the amount of $50,000. Grantee shall comply with this requirement within sixty days after written notice has been given by the City. Subd. [4.] 3 Performance Bond. The Grantee may dispense with the $300,000 performance bond required by the Franchise. The City Council may thereafter by resolution require that such bond, or a similar bond in a lesser amount, be provided by Grantee. Grantee shall comply with this requirement within sixty days after written notice has been given by the City. Subd. [5.] 4 Local Programming Obligations. Grantee shall expend at least 1% of its annual 3 Gross Revenues each fiscal year in fulfilling its Local Programming Obligations under the Franchise for public, governmental, and educational access, but it shall not be obligated to expend more than that amount for such access. That amount shall not include any costs of operation. capital for access equipment replacement previously agreed to by the parties in Exhibit 2 to the Contract for Local Programming Facilities. which is Exhibit A to the Performance Agreement. which shows the equipment to be maintained and replaced, or. administration not directly related to the provision of local programming. This expenditure shall be in complete satisfaction of Grantee's total Local Programming Obligations during the period of this ordinance. Section 5. That Section 6 of the Relief Ordinance is hereby amended to read as follows: SECTION 6. AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF RELIEF ORDINANCE PROVISIONS. The provisions of this ordinance, and the relief herein granted, shall cease to be effective, automatically, upon the occurrence of the earliest of any of the following events: [Subdivision 1. Failure of the Grantee to complete refinancing its Existing Indebtedness by December 31, 1987 in accordance with Article II, Section 4 of the Franchise.] [Subd. 2. The end of the next month after Grantee has collected cumulative Gross Revenues in the amount of one hundred million dollars as measured from September 1, 1984. The determination of cumulative Gross Revenues shall be based upon audited financial statements for periods for which they are available and upon Grantee's operating reports for period for which audited statements are not then available. Grantee shall provide City with its financial statements and financial operating reports promptly after they are prepared.] [Subd. 3.] Subdivision 1. March 1, 1992. [Subd. 4. Payment, discharge, or satisfaction of the Existing Indebtedness, except through refinancing as provided in Article II, Section 4 of the Franchise.] 4 [Subd. 5. Payment, discharge, or satisfaction of the indebtedness arising from the refinancing provided in Article II, Section 4 of the Franchise.] [Subd. 6.] Subdivision 2. Failure of the Grantee to restore or replace the full required amount of the Letter of Credit as provided in Article VIII, Section 4, paragraph H of the Franchise. [Subd. 7. Failure of the Grantee to pay the fees as required in Section 5, Subd. 2 of this ordinance.] [Subd. 8.] Subdivision 3. Failure of the Grantee to restore, replace or increase either a Letter of Credit or bond within sixty days of written notice by the City, as provided in Section 5, Subdivisions [3 and 4] 2 and 3 of this ordinance. [Subd. 9.] Subdivision 4. A holding or determination by any court or agency that any term, condition or provision of this Relief Ordinance is invalid or unenforceable, as a result of any action taken by Grantee or anyone acting on Grantee's behalf seeking such determination. [Subd. 10. Sale or transfer of all or substantially all of the System to a person or entity other than a parent, subsidiary, related corporation, affiliated corporation, partner or joint venturer of Grantee or any parent of Grantee.] [Subd. 11.] Subdivision 5. Termination of the Franchise. Section 6. That Section 7 of the Relief Ordinance is amended to read as follows: SECTION 7. OTHER TERMINATIONS. This ordinance may also be terminated for cause, under the same procedures for termination as are contained in the Franchise, for the following reasons: Subdivision 1. All grounds for termination provided in the Franchise, including the Relief Ordinance as amended, except to the extent that 5 Grantee's performance obligations are modified in this Ordinance. [Subd. 2. The purchase by Grantee, its general partner, or any parent, subsidiary, affiliate or other related corporation of Grantee or its general partner, of a cable communications system or any part thereof or interest therein, located within the seven - county metropolitan area as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 473.121, Subd. 2. For this purpose the definition of a cable communications system shall be as that term is currently defined by the Board. Such a purchase shall not be grounds for termination of this ordinance, however, if the Grantee demonstrates to the reasonable satisfaction of the City that the purchase (1) will not impair the operating cash flow or financial position of Grantee and (2) will involve independent financing of the purchase without resort to the assets of the System.] [Subd. 3.] Subdivision 2. Failure of the Grantee to comply with any of the provisions of-the Performance Agreement. Section 7. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective upon passage and adoption by City and upon satisfaction of all of the following conditions: (1) Publication of this Ordinance; (2) Passage and adoption by each of the Member Cities of the SWSCC of an Ordinance similar to this Ordinance within 45 days of'the adoption of this Ordinance; (3) Conformance by Grantee with all the terms and conditions of the Resolution, Exhibit B and of the Stipulation, Exhibit A, and of the Amendment to the Performance Agreement, Exhibit DD to the Stipulation, Exhibit A; (4) Acceptance by Grantee in conformance with Section 8 of this Ordinance; (5) Closing of the transfer of ownership from Rogers to Proposed Transferee within one (1) year from the date hereof and notice thereof to the Member Cities of SWSCC. 6 (6) Execution and delivery by Proposed Transferee of a guarantee agreement as required by Paragraph 5 of the Stipulation. Section 8. Acceptance of the Relief_ Ordinance as amended; Providing of Guarantees. Except as otherwise provided herein, this Ordinance shall be effective in accordance with the provisions of Article XIV of the Franchise including delivery to the City of the acceptance, opinion of legal counsel, guarantees.and other documents as required by said Article XIV. Passed by the City Council of the City of Edina Minnesota this day of Action on above ordinance: Date of first reading: Date of second reading: Motion for Adoption: Seconded by: Voted in favor: Voted against: Abstained: Absent: Ordinance adopted. Date of publication: SW2 /ORD2 11/7/88 7 City Mayor , 1988. EXHIBIT DD AMENDMENT TO PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT dated the day of , 1988, by and between ROGERS CABLESYSTEMS OF THE SOUTHWEST, INC., ( "Grantee "), a Minnesota corporation, its successors or assigns, ROGERS U.S. CABLESYSTEMS, INC. ( "Parent "), a Delaware corporation, its successors or assigns, the CITY OF Edina , MINNESOTA ( "City "), a municipal corporation, and the SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION ("SWSCC"), a joint powers organization created,by the Cities of Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, Minnetonka, and Richfield, Minnesota ( "Member Cities ") to amend a Performance Agreement entered into by them (hereinafter "Performance Agreement ") to be consistent with Ordinance No. 1121 (hereinafter "CATV Relief Ordinance ") as amended by Ordinance No. hereby agree as follows: WHEREAS, City has adopted a Resolution, approving this Agreement; WHEREAS, in accordance with the Resolution and the terms and conditions therein, certain modifications in relief previously provided in the CATV Relief Ordinance are required; and WHEREAS, acceptance of this Agreement and of the changes provided for herein are required in order to satisfy the conditions of the Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, based upon the consideration of each of the parties herein and the mutual understandings of them, the following changes to the Performance Agreement are hereby mutually agreed to: 1. Section 2 is amended to read as follows: Section 2. Definitions. The words and phrases used in this Agreement shall have the meanings given to them in the Franchise and CATV Relief Ordinance. "CATV Relief Ordinance" as used herein, in the Contract for Local Programming Facilities, the Contract for Public, Educational, and Government Access Services, and all agreements related thereto, shall mean the CATV Relief Ordinance (Ordinance No. 1121 ) as amended by Ordinance No. 1 2. Section 4.04 is amended to read as follows: 4.04. The City agrees to pay, to assist in providing local programming, up to, but not in excess of one - fifth (1/5) of the five percent (5%) annual franchise fee actually received by the City pursuant to the CATV Relief Ordinance, as amended,,on the following terms and conditions: (Paragraphs A through B are unchanged) C. Grantee shall deduct up to one -fifth (1/5) of the quarterly franchise fee payment made to City. The actual amount to be deducted shall be based upon the access budget prepared by Grantee and approved by the SWSCC each year. The amount deducted in accordance with the access budget shall be identified by Grantee with each payment of the franchise fee. If Grantee's required payment for local programming of one percent (1 %) of gross revenues is not fully expended in the performance of the Facilities Contract, then the remaining amounts will be expended by Grantee for local programming or used to reduce the amount payable under this paragraph pro rate among the Member Cities on the basis of the contribution of each, in the discretion of SWSCC. (Paragraphs D through H are unchanged) 3. Section 5 is amended by adding a new Section 5.07 as follows: 5.07. Pursuant to the report and recommendations issued under Section 5.04 above, development of an institutional network shall be deferred for the longer of: 1) five (5) years from the date of this Agreement, or 2) until the SWSCC reconvenes and /or reappoints SWING and SWING determines pursuant to this agreement that the institutional network is economically viable and that the construction of the network would not have an adverse impact on the financial condition of Grantee and residential subscriber rates. 2 4. This Agreement shall be effective only upon Ordinance No. becoming effective and four parallel ordinances for all Member Cities becoming effective and upon completion of the purchase of the common stock of RCA Cablesystems Holding Co. by KBL Cable, Inc., a Texas corporation, and compliance by KBL Cable, Inc., with.all of the requirements of Closing including signing and delivering a guarantee agreement required by paragraph 5 of the Stipulation of Settlement and Release between the City, Grantee, Rogers Communications, Inc., and Rogers Cablesystems of America, Inc. 5. Except as specifically modified herein, all other requirements of.the Performance Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. SW3 /AMEND2.SW 11/7/88 CITY OF Edina By Its SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION By Its ROGERS CABLESYSTEMS OF THE SOUTHWEST, INC., a Minn ,papita corporation By Its ROGERS U.S. CABLESYSTEMS, INC. its.success or assi s ' By Its 3 STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this day of. , 19 , by , the of the CITY OF , a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of said corporation. STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was me this day of the of the SOUTHWEST behalf of said corporation. STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) Notary Public subscribed and 19 , by SUBURBAN CABLE Notary Public sworn to before COMMISSION, on The foregoing instrument.was subscribed and sworn to before me this hyll day sf A/GUCM66- , 19 fr , the ,;,lrf' f ROGERS CABLESYSTEMS OF THE SOUTHWEST, INC., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of said corporatio 564, i-� ! ".ice STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) LEEANN K. PETERSON NOTARY PL6L.IC - MINNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY "W! - -y My Commission Expires Feb. 7, 1959 The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this i)Ytl day of /1 /GUP�� 7Ck°c^ , 19_2, by %W)i O 6. L.it.yf , the of ROGERS U.S. CABLESYSTEMS, INC., `its successors or assigns, on behalf of said corporation. SW3 /AMEND.SW - 10/19/88 4 Notary Public XXAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAA4AAAAAAAAAAAAA4& AX LEEANN K. PETERSON a a = ?vn NOTARY HENNEPIN COUP14TY TA J"�iy My Cammis�ien F:.xalres Feb. 7, 1923 XvVin""n"111 MV11, �wi�i4iC'JVVZ�GGG�l ,y�i� "�MY:c EXHIBIT BE WAIVER OF COMPLETION OF MINOR FRANCHISE OFFERINGS 1. The cable company provided for inter -city connection via ultra high performance bi- directional trunks utilizing feed - forward amplifiers and three - quarter or one -inch size low loss cable. The 270 MHz Mid -Split Channel Capacity would provide 17 forward and 17 reverse channels. (Form I, p. 22) Such waiver does not extend to the Proposed Transferee. 2. The cable company provided that 55 miles of PVC conduit would be installed in areas of underground construction undertaken during the initial construction period. The use of the conduit would provide for future expansion of the system to a dual cable network should the need for additional channel capacity arise. (Form I, p. la) In constructing the system, Rogers found that over 200 miles of underground plant were required. Rogers built the system using conduit under all streets and highways but not for other construction. It is the intent of the parties to this Stipulation that this policy would be continued by the Proposed Transferee. 3. Cable company was to provide 20 modulators at 20 locations throughout the joint system in addition to those provided to educational institutions. (Article IV, Sec. 1 C5) The policy of the cable company has been to provide modulators on an "as needed" basis. It is the intent of the parties to this Stipulation that this policy would be continued by the Proposed Transferee. AM2 10/19/88 i A. �1 sea REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To. THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: KENNETH ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER I Date: NOVEMBER 21, 1988 Subject: RESOLUTION OPPOSING STATE FUNDING OF MINNEAPOLIS AND ST. PAUL'S COMBINED SEWER Recommendation: Agenda Item # VII. A Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Action ❑ Motion Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommend that Council passes the Resolution suggested by the Suburban Rate Authority. Info /Background: The Suburban) Rate Authority has requested that member cities approve a resolution opposing state funding of Minneapolis'and S-t. Paul's combined sewer separation. Also attached for comparison purposes is the policy adopted by the AMM concerning the combined sewers separation. 6 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY In 1983 and after, the Suburban Rate Authority was very active in working with the MPCA and others to develop a method of funding Combined Sewer Separation projects in the two core cities. The purpose of Suburban Rate Authority participation was, of course, to safeguard insofar as possible the resources of its members, who had installed their own separated sewers. At that time. EPA was threatening to shut off all hookups in the Metropolitan area until the problem was resolved. Such action would have landed particularly hard upon Suburban Rate Authority members who are experiencing growth. After many meetings, over a period of approximately two years, and appearances in the legislature, it passed a bill providing for a loan and grant program which would enable St. Paul and Minneapolis to complete their sewer separations by 1996. The scheme settled upon by all of the parties included a combination of federal grants, no interest state loans to be repaid beginning in 1996, state grants and self -help. In the waning hours of the last legislature, two provisions were inserted in the appropriations bill which repealed the provisions requiring repayment of the loans. These repealers were not heard by any committee of the legislature, except a conference committee on the appropriations bill. In effect, the repealer which is a provision in the 1988 "Garbage Bill" removed the requirement that Minneapolis and St. Paul repay those loans forgiving the approximately $32 million that was to be paid by the two cities in 1996. Another more important matter, at least in terms of dollars, is the abolition of the federal grant program. It now appears that the federal share will be reduced by approximately $49 million from that expected when the funding plan was developed. The legislature will have to face the problem this session. The Board anticipates that the two cities will ask the legislature to make up the $49 million in federal money which will not be forthcoming. The Board feels it is patently unfair for the residents of the state to pay for the replacement and separation of sewers in St. Paul and Minneapolis as most cities have paid for their own separate storm and sanitary sewer systems. The Suburban Rate Authority Board feels that is it imperative that we speak up. In addition to passing the resolution, elected officials should make sure that their state legislative delegation understands the problem. i re RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS. the Suburban Rate Authority has assisted the Metropolitan Council, the Minnesota Pollution 'Control Agency and the Minnesota Legislature in formulating a program for funding combined sewer separation in the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul; and WHEREAS. such sewer separation is required by law and by contract, and is otherwise desirable; and WHEREAS, expected federal funding for the program has been cancelled and replacement funding must be identified; and WHEREAS, most cities in the seven county metropolitan area have built separate sanitary and storm sewer I systems, principally through local funding; and WHEREAS, the cities of St. Paul and Miiuzeapolis have obtained legislation forgiving approximately $32 million in separation loans from the state; NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Edina, does by this resolution state that it is opposed to the spreading of the replacement funding upon the State Treasury, and that it believes the most equitable resolution is for the affected cities to themselves provide that funding. AMM POLICY IV -E COMBINED SEWERS - SEPARATION The three communities of Minneapolis, St. Paul and South St. Paul still have a significant amount of combined waste water and storm water sewers which create overflows of untreated waste water into the Mississippi River during heavy rains and storm water runoff periods. These cities have over many years been progressing with sewer separation projects paid for primarily through local tax levies. The 'Federal and State governments are pressing the issue of meeting certain water quality standards in the Mississippi River consistantly which apparently cannot be done until separation is complete. The state has provided additional funding since the 1985 Legislative Session to help pay for the speed up. IT HAS BEEN AMM POLICY THAT IF THE STATE GOVERNMENT CONTINUES TO PURSUE THE ACCELERATED COMBINED SEWER SEPARATION PROGRAM IN THE THREE CITIES, THAT IT ALSO CONTINUE TO PROVIDE FUNDING TO ENSURE THAT NEITHER LOCAL PROPERTY TAXES NOR METROPOLITAN SANITARY SEWER COSTS ARE INCREASED DUE TO THE ACCELERATED BUILD EFFORT. THE PROGRAM TO DATE HAS PROCEEDED ACCORDING TO THAT POLICY. CONSIDERABLE FEDERAL MONEY HAS ALSO BEEN AVAILABLE TO ASSIST IN THE SEPARATION PROJECT IN THE PAST. THE AMM UNDERSTANDS THAT FEDERAL FUNDS WILL BE CUT DRAMATICALLY IN FUTURE YEARS, REQUIRING A FINANCIAL RESTRUCTURING OF THE PROGRAM. AS THE CSO ISSUE HAS SIGNIFICANT IMPLICATIONS, BOTH FOR STATE FINANCES AND FOR DEVELOPMENT IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA, THE AMM REQUESTS THAT ITS BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW AND COMMENT ON ANY SIGNIFICANT CHANGE IN THE FINANCING OR IMPLEMENTATION PLANS FOR THE SEPARATION PROJECT. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Suburban Rate Authority has assisted the Metropolitan Council, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Legislature in formulating a program for funding combined sewer separation in the cities of Minneapolis and St.Paul; and WHEREAS, such sewer separation is required by law and by contract, and is otherwise desirable; and WHEREAS, expected federal funding for the program has been cancelled and replacement funding must be identified; and WHEREAS, most cities in the seven county metropolitan area have built separate sanitary and storm sewer systems, principally through local funding; NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Edina, does by this resolution state that it is opposed to the spreading of the replacement funding upon the State Treasury, and that it believes the most equitable resolution is for the affected cities to themselves provide that funding. ADOPTED this 21st day of November, 1988. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 21, 1988, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 7th day of December, 1988. City Clerk A. �1 o e `' O J•,�RPOMtit'v iasB REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland From: David A. Velde Date: November 14, 1988 Subject 1989 Laboratory Services Agreement for Hennepin County Agenda Item # vii. 'B. Consent Fx I Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution to enter into an agreement with Hennepin County for the provisions of analytical laboratory services for calendar year 1989. Info /Background: The City of Edina has been providing laboratory support services to Hennepin County since 1977. The testing is performed on a fee per test basis with a maximum of $2,000.00 for calendar year 1989. A PQAT TTT T ONT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that it hereby authorizes and-directs the Mayor and Manager to execute Agreement No. 90137 between the County of Hennepin and the City of Edina, for the period of January 1, 1989 through December 31, 1989 for the purpose of providing Environmental ..Health.Laboratory Services for Hennepin County. ADOPTED this 21st day of November, 1988. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 21, 1988, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 5th day of December, 1988. City Clerk �.j A. 0 v•'��bRPONN�t'� ..G 1888 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: - KENNETH ROSLAND CITY MANAGER From: GORDON L. HUGHES ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER Date: NOVEMBER 21, 1988 Subject: OVERNIGHT PARKING IN PUBLIC RAMP AT 50TH AND FRANCE Recommendation: Info /Background: Agenda Item # VIII. A Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance 0 Discussion Attached is a letter from Ms. Mary C. Layer of the Lanterns Condominiums requesting permission to obtain a.parking permit which would allow park- ing in excess of the time limits posted in the ramps. Specifically, she and apparently other Lanterns residents wish to park their cars overnight in the 51st Street ramp. As you know, parking permits are available at 50th and France, but according to Ordinance No. 1232, only persons em- ployed by businesses at 50th and France may purchase such stickers. In addition, we have discouraged overnight parking by persons possessing a permit due to the risk of vandalism or theft. The ramps are not closed or gated at night and the City does not employ a security service to guard the ramps. If the Council wishes to consider the request, it should direct staff to prepare an amendment to Ordinance No. 1232. Staff would recommend against such an amendment due to concerns about overnight parking. November 11, 1988 City of Edina 4801 W 50th Avenue South Edina, Mn 55424 Attention Mayor and Council Members Subject: Overnight Parking in Public Ramp on 50th and France (behind Lunds) As.a resident of the The Lanterns (4075 W 51st Street) I am making a request to contract park at the above ramp. Three possible choices are: 1. 24 hour contract parking paid monthly. 2. 14 hour contract parking (6pm - 8am) paid monthly. 3. gither of the above limited to the months of December, January, February, March. Advantages to the above request are: Increase in revenue to the city of Edina Marketing plus to prospective home buyers in the 50th and France Avenue area Vehacles would be off streets (ex:snow removeable) At this time only employees of businesses have the opportunity to contract park. Please consider this request and notify me of your decision. Sincerely, Mary C. Layel` cc: The Lanterns Association 4075 W: 51st Street Edina MN 55424 ' ---- -- - ------- - ' --- --- - - - -- ------------ � o*scw � - 'no c^.. or sozmA - ' uTsm cxsnx ww..o*rs _'_ AmnumT _ _ vsmoon _ zTsm oswCmIp7zom 3e3o38 11/15/88 e'sws.ao o*usY Toss sxpseT CO rnss TRzmmzwm e.505.60 l � � vv-e`-oe /os v | � ACCOUNT NO. MESSAGE 6*-1300-013-18 ***-Cnm ' ' ( ****** 4w|- 3e6715 _ - 11/14/66 '- -_ |`' � / 3e6714 11/14/86 r, -25.00 25.00 * 55.00 JUDY LIEBER ' p**-CmS � vIau*L - -- ----- VISUAL ARTS 30-4224-781-78 i� � sea7ow ' ' 11/1*/88 ' - - 4*.00 K KATE cueRv - - -- CONTRACTUAL S SERVICES 3 30-4224-791-78 -----� - - - ' - *n�nn * * . ..^m 3e6701 1 11/14/88 8 80.00 a aTsys Ys*msn n nVmrmAcTu*L a asnvxosa 3 30-*ee*-761-7e � � 80.00 * * w wv 3e670e 1 11/1+/88 - --- 30.00 - -' sozmA-wwzwmzw - - c cmwTnAoTwwL - -SERVICES ----30�'w224-4_8_1- - ---- - - �` 3n�uo * * ~ ~* . seoToo 1 11/1*/88 5 50.00 s soIww *zm* 00000L o oowTnwoTuwL m msnvzCsm 3 30-4ee4-7e1-78 � � ^� s ' sn�wn * * ~ ~w 3e670+ - -li/i4/88 -- ----' 1 150.00 - --- -oucwrAzLS -- -- - - CONTRACTUAL S SERVICES - ------ - -- 150.00 * * � �� '. s searos 1 11/1*/66 2 295.00 o ozon n*nww c cowTn*CTwwL a asnvzosm 3 30-*ea4-781-78 � � eys.no 3e6706 - - vi/i4/o8 — - -- - sw.uo - ---� zzm *AmzLTmm --- --- - -- CONTRACTUAL - -SERVICES ---t - -----'-' - - ' s*.wo * * , ' 3e6707 1 11/14/66 , ,no.wo B BOB BENHAM Cumrn*cTwwL w wsnvIcsS 3 30-4e24-7e1-78 180.00 * * ' 'nw ' 3e6708 - --11/1*/ee-----' - ----- ao.ou------- B BLOOMINGTON ----''-- - ---'CONTRACTUAL -SERVICES - ---' - -----�� — — ��. 60.00 ^ � �aa7oy � ��on 5 50.00 o oI*mw oswRnnw u uomTmwcrwwL w wsRvIosw 3 30-4224-781-78 s*.no * * @ @N �ea7vn -' — —11/14/8e---'--'-----so.00 - ----CH*R Hwwesw----'—'��- C CONTRACTUAL S SERVICES 3 30-4224-781-78 ' 50.00 {"' - 326711 1 -- - --_--- - -__- - --_ _ -- ----- ' CONTRACTUAL a '----- - -- -----' ---------� -- - ---- - -- @w `| 25.00 .. � 3e671e 1 11 /1+/88----'--'---- 6 6+.00 - -- -Twiw CITIES --- --'-- C ComTn*cruwL-osevzdsS---30-4�k4-76N- - --'------'- ! a� nw � * � |". - 3e6713 1 --'-- - ---- — — - --' - --' - ----' - - - -- -------------- - - . 3e6715 _ - 11/14/66 '- -_ |`' � / 3e6714 11/14/86 r, -25.00 25.00 * 55.00 JUDY LIEBER ' p**-CmS � vIau*L - -- ----- VISUAL ARTS 30-4224-781-78 i� � r, -25.00 25.00 * 55.00 JUDY LIEBER ' p**-CmS � vIau*L - -- ----- VISUAL ARTS 30-4224-781-78 i� � 1988 CITY OF EDINA 11 -21 -88 PAGE 2 AMOUNT CHECK NO. DATE a ___ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. M MESSAGE 55.00 326719 11/14/88 326720 11/14/88 326721 11/14/88 ` 326723 11/14/88 * * * * *+ VISUAL ARTS 30- 4224 - 781 -78 326726 11/15/88 25.00 326727 11/15/88 326728 11/15/88 326729 11/15/88 KENNETH GRINDELAND 326730 11/15/88 326731 11/15/88 ` 326731 11/15/88 326732 11/15/88 25.00 326733 11/15/88 VISUAL ARTS 326734 11/15/88 326735 11/15/88 326736 11/15/88 326737 11/15/88 q® * ** -CKS 25.00 PATRICK MENEELY VISUAL ARTS CHECK REGISTER 11 -21 -88 PAGE 2 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ___ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. M MESSAGE 55.00 + * ** -CKS _ 25.00 AGNES FINE VISUAL ARTS 30- 4224 - 781 -78 25.00 + - - 25.00 KENNETH GRINDELAND VISUAL ARTS 30-4224-781 -78 25.00 * 25.00 BOB CONNOLLY VISUAL ARTS 30 -4224- 781 -78 25.00 * * ** -CKS 25.00 PATRICK MENEELY VISUAL ARTS 30- 4224 - 781 -78 25.00 * * ** -CKS 285.00 FRANK EVANS ART COMM 30- 3501 - 000 -00 285.00 * 90.00 THOMAS HENRY INSTRUCTOR 23- 4105 - 612 -61 90.00 * 756.00 JUDITH LAUGHLIN INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 756.00 * 150.00 TOM POLZINE PT MAINT 23- 4105-612 -61 150.00 * 319.50 LINJO ASSOC CHEMICALS 30- 4564- 783 -78 11369 7468 319.50 325.50 THE PRINT SHOP PRINTING 23- 4600- 611 -61 0836 7743 469.00 THE PRINT SHOP PRINTING 23- 4600 - 611-61 0835 7744 794.50 * 138.34 WOMANS CLUB OF MPLS ADVERTISING 23 -4214- 611 -61 138.34 * 317.56 THE ARTERY COST OF COMM 23 -4624- 613 -61 21187 7592 317.56 * 140.00 CRAIG LARSEN SCHOOL 10 -4202- 120 -12 140.00 + 475.00 CREATIVE VISUALS OFFICE SUPPLYS 30- 4516 - 781 -78 021358 7691 475.00 * 170.40 NANCY KNUDSON SERVICES 28 -4201- 701 -70 170.40 * 7,969.00 DEDE HENSEL SERVICES • 28- 4201 - 701 -70 -- q 1988 Y OF EDINA CHECK .ISTER 11 -21 -b. PAGE 3 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT _ VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE 7,969.00 + • 326738 11/15/88 67.56 GENERAL LIFE AMBULANCE REFUND 10- 3180- 000 -00 67.56 + 326739 11/15/88 8.00 PAT MEIER REFUND 10- 1145 - 000 -00 8.00 + 326740 11/15/88 30.00 FL FOLIAGE ASSN DUES 30- 4204- 781 -78 30.00 + 326741 11/15/88 63.90 FRANCIS CALLAHAN MILEAGE 10 -4208- 480 -48 63.90 + 326742 11/15/88 8.00 JEANETTE ROBERT REFUND 10- 1145 - 000 -00 8.00 + 326743 11/15/88 153.73 INLAND TRUCK PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 52267 4346 153.73 + 326744 11/15/88 164.30 DONALD HUTCHINSON GEN SUPPLYS 10- 4504 - 500 -50 164.30 + 326745 11/15/88 60.00 LYNETTE ROUTH REFUND 10- 3350 - 000-00 60.00 + , 326746 11/15/88 185.10 BOB CLARK STREET LITES 10- 4252 - 321 -30 185.10 + 326747 11/15/88 742.40 GARVEN GREETING INVENTORY 50 -4632- 862 -86 742.40 + 326748 11/15/88 98.00 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY SCHOOL 10- 4202- 440 -44 98.00 + Q 326749 11/15/88 59.55 VIRGINIA MCCOLLISTER SCHOOL 10 -4202- 480 -48 59.55 + 326750 11/15/88 8.00 PRISCILLA VANPUTTEN REFUND 10- 1145- 000 -00 8.00 + 326751 11/15/88 15.00 HERB DECKER REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 520 -52 326751 11/15/88 30.00 HERB DECKER REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 861 -86 326751 11/15/88 30.00- HERB DECKER REPAIRS 10 -4248- 861 -86 326751 11/15/88 105.00 HERB DECKER GEN SUPPLYS _ 28 -4504- 702 -70 326751 11/15/88 30.00 HERB DECKER REPAIRS 50- 4248 - 861 -86 150.00 + 326752 11/15/88 13.11 DAYTIMERS GEN SUPPLYS 10- 4504-140 -14 13.11 + 326753 11/15/88 11,858.00 C 0 FIELD CO PAYMENT 25- 4946 - 520 -52 11,858.00 + v 326754 11/15/88 39.60 BRAEMAR ARENA POPCORN BOXES 26- 4624-683 -68 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -21 -88 PAGE 4 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. 8 MESSAGE 39.60 + 326755 11/15/88 48.78 SUSAN FRAME CRAFT SUPPLYS 23 -4588- 611 -61 1620 7669 48.78 • 326756 11/15/88 409.00 CREIGHTON CO BLDG RENOVATION 25- 4942- 001 -23 00520 7667 409.00 + 326757 11/15/88 1,237.00 ANDERBERG LUND SERVICES 10 -4201- 508 -50 882597 7602 1,237.00 • 326758 11/15/88 31.97 PC MAGAZINE SUBSCRIPTION 10- 4204 - 160 -16 31.97 • 326759 11/15/88 60.02 FLEET SUPPLY SUPPLYS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 42786 7147 60.02 + 326760 11/15/88 35.00 EDINA PET HOSPITAL SERVICES 10- 4201- 470 -47 35.00 + 326761 11/15/88 171.20 TIRE TOWN REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 702 -70 35621 7612 171.20 • 326762 11/15/88 615.00 MARKETING FACTOS SERVICES 50- 4201 - 820 -82 326762 11/15/88 615.00 MARKETING FACTOS SERVICES 50- 4201 - 840-84 326762 11/15/88 615.00 MARKETING FACTOS SERVICES 50- 4201- 860 -86 1,845.00 • 326763 11/15/88 275.23 GLOBE PRINTING 28- 4600 - 701 -70 B62292 7342 275.23 • 326764 11/15/88 85.00 GREATER MPLS DUES 10- 4204 - 200 -20 32801 85.00 • 326765 11/15/88 43.80 TC HARDWARE GEN SUPPLYS 10- 4504 - 646-64 247534 7181 43.80 326766 11/15/88 432.00 THE COPLEY PLAZA SCHOOL 10- 4202 - 100 -10 432.00 • 326767 11/15/88 95.21 HILLYARD CLEAN SUPPLYS 10- 4512- 520 -52 29720 - 7541 95.21 • 326768 11/15/88 203.18 RICHARD J HERKEL SERVICES 10 -4120- 180 -18 326768 11/15/88 15.30 RICHARD J HERKEL MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 180 -18 218.48 + 326769 11/15/88 474.88 HOWARD NORBACK SERVICES 10- 4120-180-18 326769 11/15/88 47.93 HOWARD NORBACK MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 180 -18 522.81 + 326770 11/15/88 8.00 VIRGINIA TAYLOR REFUND 10 -1145- 000 -00 8.00 • 326771 11/15/88 451.20 KELLY SERVICES SERVICES 10- 4200 - 180 -18 44144 'r w' w w vS+ VIr $► b 1988 OF EDINA CHECK 3TER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT _ VENDOR -- _- _ITEM- DESCRIPTION "_ 451.20 + 11 -21-86 ,GE 5 r ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. A MESSAGE 1 rr 326772 11/15/88 330.00 MN DEPT OF FIREARM SAFETY 29- 3500 - 000 -00 330.00 • 19,256.65 ,r 326773 11/15/88 110.35 MILEYS SPRINK SYST REPAIRS 60- 1x300- 044 -08 + 110.35 + 326784 J 326774 - 11/15/88 6,811.00 HEWITT ASSOC SERVICES 10- 4201- 140 -14 21,571.54 6,811.00 • J 326775 11/15/88 88.00 MN ELEVATOR SERVICE CONTRACT 30 -4288- 781 -78 100432 r 88.00 + 326776 11/15/88 135.50 KENNEDY WEBSTER ELEC SUPPLYS 30- 4504 - 782 -78 10569 7772 ED MATERIALS 10 -4212- 510 -51 456257 135.50 + 54.95 326777 11/15/88 284.00 BRUNER SUPPLYS 30- 4504-782 -78 182417 7773 125.00 PETERS BILLARDS 284.00 • b v 326778 11/15/88 150.00 FRED RICHARDS SCHOOL 10 -4202- 100 -10 150.00 + - - -- - -- - -- - - -- -- - - - 326779 11/15/88 68.57 FIRST SECURITY TITLE REFUND 40 -3800- 000 -00 27 -4208- 661 -66 68.57 + 91.13 v 326780 11/15/88 46.89 NORWEST BANK REFUND 40 -3800- 000-00 ANDERSON TRAVEL _ 46.89 + V 326781 11/15/88 22.77 EDINA REALTY REFUND 40 -3800- 000 -00 22.77 + v 326782 11/15/88 7.30 COMM CREDIT SERV REFUND 40- 3800 - 000 -00 rr 7.30 + 326783 11/15/88 19,256.65 ANNADALE PAYMENT 60- 2040-000 -00 >!I 1 9, 256 .65 + 326784 11/15/88 21,571.54 GUNDERSON BROS PAYMENT 60 -2040- 000 -00 *r 21,571.54 + 326785 11/15/66 3,832.90 -3692 -90 G L CONTRACTING PAYMANT 60-2040-000 -00 r 3,832.90* 3,89e.90 --• I 326786 11/15/88 54.95 CARRERTRACK ED MATERIALS 10 -4212- 510 -51 456257 i 54.95 + 326787 11/15/88 125.00 PETERS BILLARDS REPAIRS 27 -2237- 000 -00 b 326787 11/15/88 122.54 PETERS BILLARDS CONTRACTED REPAIRS 27- 4248 - 662 -66 247..54 - - - -- - -- - -- - - -- -- - - - dl 326788 11/15/88 91.13 DAN DORNSEIF MILEAGE 27 -4208- 661 -66 91.13 • r " 326789 11/15/88 358.00 ANDERSON TRAVEL SCHOOL 27- 4202-661 -66 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -21 -88 PAGE 6 j 0 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. • MESSAGE z 358.00 + i 326790 11/15/88 150.00 GOLF COURSE SUPER SCHOOL 27 -4202- 661 -66 150.00 « 17 326791 11/15/88 443.92 JOHN VALLIERE SCHOOL 27 -4202- 661 -66 j' 443.92 + 326792 11/15/88 41,250.00 NORWEST BANK MNB NA INTEREST 10- 1145 - 000 -00 326792 11/15/88 200,000.00 NORWEST BANK MNB NA PRINCIPLE 10 -1145- 000 -00 326792 11/15/88 99.00 NORWEST BANK MNB NA AGENT FEE - - - -- 10 -1145- 000 -00 -- -- - -- - 241 .349.00 • - -- - 326794 11/15/88 211.94 JOHN FITZGERALD AMBULANCE REFUND 10-3180- 000 -00 211.94 + " 326795 11/15/88 250.00 BLAINE BELL COMM SERVICES 40 -4201- 800 -80 "- 326795 11/15/88 _ -. .__ 116.67 _ BLAINE BELL COMM SERVICES _ _ 50- 4201- 820 -82 - 326795 11/15/88 116.67 BLAINE BELL COMM SERVICES 50 -4201- 840 -84 326795 11/15/88 116.66 BLAINE BELL COMM SERVICES 50- 4201 - 860 -86 600.00 • 326796 11/15/68 674.45 LEISURE TRAVEL CABLE TV 10 -2146- 000 -00 ^ 326796 11/15/88 _ 393.00 _ LEISURE TRAVEL _ -_ .,. - SCHOOL._ -- 1,067.45 + I 326797 11/15/88 247.43 CONSOLIDATED FWY - - - - - - GEN SUPPLY SUPPLY--- - 10- 4504-507 -50 913554 ' 247.43 - - -- 326798 _- 11/15/88 _- _ -_ -. -- 10.00 _P__6 L_ AUTO - _ - _ __ SERVICES _ _ -_ -10 -4274- 42.0- 42__39846 _ - - - - -- -- -- - 10.00 • 326799 11/15/88 42.00 VETERANS ELECTRONIC - - - -. .. - - CABLE TV -- 10 -2149- 000 -00 47476 7594 I. 42.00 • - - -- -- - - -- - i 326800. 11/15/88 _ . _ 350.00 CITY OF ST -PAUL _ _ - _ _ TRAINING------.-- - __._.- ____10 -4202- 420 - 42_01.1656_ ___ _ I, 350.00 + 326801 11/15/88 49.00 GRAPHIC UNLIMITED -- SERVICES - - -- -- 10- 4233- 420 -42 11517 7689 .. I .,. 49.00 • -- - 326802 11/15/88 12.20 AUTO CLUB OF MPLS PRINTING ___10-4600-420-4243097 ^i 12.20 • -- 326803- 11/15/68 - -- -- - - - - -- - -- 150.00 MN DEPT OF - - - -- - - - -- -- -- - - -- - SERVICES 1.0-4268- 420 -42 326803 11/15/88 90.00 - -- MN DEPT OF SERVICES 10- 4268 - 420 -42 _ I" 240.00 • 326804 11/15/88 49.55 CROWN MARKING INC SUPPLYS 10- 4504 - 420 -42 83711 ' 49.55 + 326805 11/15/88 45.00 GOVT TRAINING 8ERV SCHOOL 10-4202- 100-10 4980 i 326805 11/15/88 53.00 GOVT TRAINING SERV SCHOOL 10- 4202- 100-10 4960 - - ; I' 1988 OF EDINA CHECK 3TER 11 -21-86 GE 7 CHECK NO. DATE _ _ AMOUNT. VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE i 326805 11/15/88 45.00- GOVT TRAINING SERV SCHOOL 10- 4202 - 100-10 4980 ,r 53.00 + r, 326806 11/15/88 1,141.54 MID COM INC SERVICES 10- 4201 - 500 -50 1013 7782 - - - 1,141.54 + - ,�,. * ** * ** * *•-CKS a. 326A09 11/15/88 787.09 AAA LICENSES 10- 4310 - 560 -56 787.09 • v.. * * * * ** ** *-CKS - v r, 326A11 11/09/88 39.98 ACE SUPPLY SUPPLYS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 57791 7352 326A11 11/08/88 23.95 ACE SUPPLY BLDG RENOVATION 25- 4942 - 001 -23 7521 7 63.93 • 326Al2 11/09/88 175.00 ACME WINDOW CLEANING OCT SERVICE 10-4504- 390 -30 *„ 175.00 • s *ssss - - -- - --- -- - -- -- - - - - -- - - -- - *rr -CKS 326A23 __..11/14/88 _ 25.00 ALSTAD- MARIAN VISUAL- ARTS 30- 4224 - 781 -76 25.00 • r *s *s* ** *-CKS �. 326A29 11/15/88 59.20 ALBINSON GEN SUPPLYS 40- 4504 - 803 -80 504696 7451 li 59.20 • r 326A30 11/15/88 17.00 ALFONS ANDERSON CLEANING 27- 4630- 663 -66 ,y 17.00 + * **-CKS 326A39 11/09/88 54.72 ALTERNATOR REBUILD BATTERY 10 -4504- 440 -44 1601 7459 Sri 326A39 11/09/88 162.32 ALTERNATOR REBUILD BATTERIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 1600 7430 217.04 • r * ** * ** *r* -CKS iy 326A41 11/15/88 158.59 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE CONCESSIONS 27- 4624- 663 -66 w .. 326A41 11/15/88 149.85 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE CONCESSIONS 27- 4624 - 663 -66 - - - - - - - - 308.44 • - -- r,� * ** -CKS 41 326A49 11/09/88 174.85 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10 -4262- 440 -44 06200 Sri.. 326A49 11/09/88 126.57 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10 -4262- 520 -52 00046 Y 326A49 11/09/88 - ..... _...._ _ 22.42 _- AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY _ 10 -4262- 520 -52 50101 326A49 11/14/88 11.77 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 4262- 628 -62 �r 326A49 11/07/88 38.21 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 27 -4262- 663 -66 .40 326A49 ----- 11/09/88 1.96.--- ____AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 326A49 11/09/88 27.48 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50- 4262- 821 -82 35334 _ r 326A49 11/09/88 32.10 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50- 4262 - 841 -84 35320 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 326A49 11/09/88 # # # # ## 2715 326A63 11/15/88 326A63 11/15/88 35314 • 326A76 11/15/88 326A76 11/15/88 # # # # ## 326ASS 11/15/88 2946 326A98 11/14/88 326A99 11/14/88 BULBS 28- 4624- 703 -70 326805 11/14%88 326805 11/14/88 326905 11/14/88 326805 11/14/88 326905 11/14/68 ** #-CKS 10- 4528 - 314 -30 326807 11/07/88 326B07 11/07/88 # # # # ## 326814 11/07/88 326814 11/07/88 326814 11/07/88 326B1S 11/09/88 326BIS 11/09/88 AMOUNT 20.87 456.23 * 25.00 117.06 142.06 * 68.00 26.00- 42.00 * 163.17 163.17 3,380.00 3,360.00 * 21.56 21.56 * 20.00 25.00 16.48 13.50 48.92 123.90 1,077.24 428.86 1,506.10 * 229.25- 299.25 229.25 299.25 * 27.70 108.20 135.90 * CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY ERIC ANDERSON ERIC ANDERSON ASPLUND COFFEE ASPLUND COFFEE AUDIO VISUAL WHSE AVR INC AXT -LYLE BACH -BILL BACH -BILL BACH -BILL BACH -BILL BACH -BILL BADGER METER INC BADGER METER INC BARRETT MOV 4 STOR BARRETT MOV d STOR BARRETT MOV & STOR BATTERY WAREHOUSE BATTERY WAREHOUSE DUES SCHOOL CONCESSIONS CREDIT GEN SUPPLYS CONCRETE REIMBURSEMENT MILEAGE POSTAGE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES METER PARTS 40- 4540-807 -80 i 2715 11 -21 -88 PAGE 8 558289 2715 ACCOUNT NO. INV. k P.O. A MESSAGE 50- 4262- 861 -86 35314 • 2946 * ** -CKS 10 -1145- 000 -00 2946 10 -4202- 500 -50 10- 4236- 160 -18 2946 * ** -CKS - 28- 4624 - 703 -70 23161 BULBS 28- 4624- 703 -70 20970 7281 BULBS 10-4540- 560 -56 * ** -CKS 30 -4504- 782 -78 13178 7739 ** #-CKS 10- 4528 - 314 -30 88497 4800 29-4624 - 722 -72 * ** -CKS 30- 4206 - 781 -78 30 -4290- 781 -78 30- 4504-781 -78 30-4504- 782 -78 30- 4516-781-78 * ** -CKS METER PARTS 40- 4540-807 -80 558107 2715 METER PARTS 40- 4540 - 807 -80 558289 2715 * ** -CKS SERVICES 10- 4236 - 180 -18 2946 SERVICES 10 -4236- 180 -18 2946 SERVICES 10- 4236- 160 -18 2946 *** -CKS BULBS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 2901 7281 BULBS 10-4540- 560 -56 1992 7281 1,988 Y OF EDINA CHECK ISTER 11 -21 -L 'AGE 9 CHECK NO. DATE -___ AMOUNT- _ VENDOR - _- ITEM_DESCR.IPTION_ -__ -_ ACCOUNT NO_INV.-N P.O. MESSAGE I' _# _ J I' * ** -CKS u„ 326B22 11/08/88 443.02 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 27 -4630- 663 -66 326B22 11/14/88 896.15 BEER WHOLESALERS _- INVENTORY 326B22 11/08/88 2,264.25 BEER WHOLESALERS INVENTORY 50-4630- 842 -84 326B22 11/14/88 1,378.70 BEER WHOLESALERS INVENTORY 50- 4630- 862 -86 ti 4,982.12 + ,�, rrrrrr r ** -CKS 326B27 11/14/88 220.50 BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626- 822-82 ,�.. 326B27 11/14/88 414.00 BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626- 842 -84 326827 '11/14/88 428.50 BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626- 862- 86 _____ 1,063.00 + ur * *+-CKS 326830 11/15/88 78.49 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GEN SUPPLYS 10 -4504- 510 -51 418735 326830 11/08/88 7.98 BERTELSON BROS. INC. NOTEBOOKS _ 10- 4504 - 627 -62 417078 326B30 11/08/88 211.79 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLYS 10- 4516- 510 -51 416880 7673 326B30 11/09/88 101.80 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLYS 10 -4516- 510 -51 414712 7609 326830 11/09/88 ___ -- - 70.00 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLYS 10- 4516 - 510 - 51.411196 7609 326830 11/14/88 15.96 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10 -4516- 510 -51 417160 7605 326830 11/09/88 118.77 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLYS 10 -4516- 510 -51 414852 7609 326830 11/07/88 6.80 _ _ BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLYS- ___- ____ -30- 451 -6- 781 - 78.41471.1 -' 611.59 + r 326932 11/07/88 88.00 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS GEN SUPPLYS 30- 4504 - 782 -78 86639 7470 _- -- - 88.00.. + - ,y�' r * * * ** * ** -CKS 326B78 11/14/88 63.25 BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC CLEANING SUPPLY 10- 4512 - 520 -52 108579 7542 r, 63.25 + * ** -CKS 326B80 t 1/07/88 _ _- 95.53_ ___.._ BROWNING_ FERRIS - - -_- __ _ _- RUBBISH REMOVAL -4250- 628 -62 95.53 • _ -10 +r •:` _ *r* -CKS 326882 11/08/88 21.00 BRUNSON INSTRUMENT GEN SUPPLYS 10- 4504 - 260 -26 074607 7400 y - - - -- - - - -- - - - 2 1.00 + _ I" r ** -CKS V 326B93 11/15/88 30.75 BUS RECORDS CORP. GEN SUPPLYS 10- 4504 - 180 -18 160887 7763 326B93 11/14/88 12.75 BUS RECORDS CORP. GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 180 -18 608909 IS, - - - - -- - 43.50 -w - - - - -- -- - V * ** -CKS v fA 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -21 -88 PAGE 10 CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. A MESSAGE 326C01 11/14/88 141.82 C S DISTRIBUTING COST OF COMMODITIES 23- 4624- 613 -61 077242 7591 141.82 + rr *rrr _ - - - - - -- - - rrr -CKS 326C07 11/07/88 1,324.36 CARGILL INC. SALT 10- 4538-318 -30 895141 7438 1,324.36 + 326C08 11/09/88 274.09 CARLSON LK ST EQUIP. SUPPLYS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 S17543 7511 274.09 r rrrrs+ ++ +-CKS 326C17 11/09/88 75.00 CDP MACHINE RENTAL 10- 4504 - 540 -54 943639 6770 75.00 • t s +rrrr +++ -CKS 326C25 - 11/14/88 - 51.85 ._CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO ADVERTISING 10 -4210- 140 -14 91682 51.85 r 326C26___ -_ _11/15/88 _. 155.94 _ _- _CHECK- REGRIGERATION . _ _ _CONTRACTED REPAIRS 28 -4248- 703-70 51468 7257 155.94 • - - - - -- - -- ' srsrrs 326C30 11/14/88 315.76 CITY BEER INVENTORY 50-4630 - 822 -82 326C30- 11/08/88 _ _ 398.70 _ CITY BEER_ -._ INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 842 -84 326C30 11/14/88 87.00 CITY BEER INVENTORY 50- 4630-862 -86 801.46 + srrrrr rrr -CKS 326C36 __ 11/14/88 _ 36.75 _— __ -CI_TY WIDE_ SERVICES - _________CONTRACTED_REPAIRS 50- 4248 - 841-84 36.75 • - — — -- .. ^' 326C44 11/14/88 145.25 COCA COLA BOTTLING COST OF GOODS SOLD 27 -4624- 663-66 3742 326C44 _ _ 11/15/88 238.72 COCA COLA BOTTLING CONCESSIONS__ 28 -4624- 703-70 326C44 11/14/88 265.45 COCA COLA BOTTLING _ _ _ __ INVENTORY 50 -4632- 822-82 326C44 11/08/86 598.00 COCA COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY 50- 4632- 842 -84 326C44 11/14/88._ _ 464.40 _ _ _COCA - COLA - 'BOTTLING INVENTORY 50- 4632-862 -86 iJ 1,711.82 r - — "I rrrrsr — - - — - - - -- - - - - -- — - -- rrr -CK_S 326C51 11/07/88 763.40 COMM OF REVENUE FUEL TAX 10- 4612- 560 -56 - -- - - —363.40 srrrrr rrr -CKS 326C64 11/07/88 28.04 CONT- MINNESOTA GEN SUPPLYS 27 -4504- 663 -66 326C64 11/07/88 2,804.00- CONT- MINNESOTA GEN SUPPLYS 27 -4504- 663 -66 - 1988 f OF EDINA CHECK ISTER 11 -21 -8. AGE 11 CHECK NO. DATE _ AMOUNT _ VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT -NO. INV. N P.O.- •_MESSAGE y 326C64 11/07/88 28.04- CONT- MINNESOTA GEN SUPPLYS 27 -4504- 663 -66 326C64 11/07/88 2,804.00 CONT- MINNESOTA GEN SUPPLYS _.. 27- 4504 - 663 -66 326C64 11/07/88 280.43 CONT- MINNESOTA GEN SUPPLYS 27 -4504- 663 -66 Aw 326C64 11/07/88 120.75 CONT- MINNESOTA CLEANING SUPPLYS 27- 4512 - 663 -66 326C64 11/07/88 1,371.34 CONT- MINNESOTA CONCESSIONS _______27_-_4624-663-66__ v 1,772.52 + - - Aw #ii #ii - -- - - - - - - - -- - - -- - -- - - - -- r ## -CKS - 326C75 11/14/88 81.54 COURTNEY WAYNE C MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 100 -10 ` -- 81.54 ► - - - y'.. rr• -CKS V 326C83 11/14/88 273.00 CRYSTAPLEX GENERAL SUPPLY 28- 4504 - 702 -70 C1809 7479 �,. 273.00 • rrr -CKS y_ � 326C89 11/14/88_ 11.33 _ CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. SUPPLIES _ _ -- 1.0- 450.4 - 641 -64_ 34358___ 7472 - 11.33 + - 326C91 11/15/88 46.00 CUSTOM CAMERA PHOTO SUPP 10- 4508 - 420 -42 _ ---.46.00 • - -. _ _ _ -- _ r• #- CKS 326D15 11/09/88 57.10 DALCO CORPORATION SUPPLYS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 216036 7371 57.10 • ••• -CKS 326D21 11/09/88 160._00 DANNYS_ CONSTR. _ -CO. _ BOOM TRUCK RENTAL -4248- 460 -46 5662 7372 160.00 • - - - ^10 rr# -CKS -. 326D27 11/14/88 64.50 DAVE S FOOD WAGON COST OF GOODS SOLD 27 -4624- 663 -66 3743 64.50 • Iw rrr -CKS v 326D29 11/08/88 148.75 DAVIDSEN DIST. INC. INVENTORY 50- 4630- 842 -84 �+y 148.75 • •V I. ririri ------ - - - - -- - - - -- rrr-CKS 326D43 11/15/88 -7,560.00 DELANO ERICKSON ARCH ARENE ART 8807 7,560.00 + Ar •t rr•-CKS v, 326D61 11/14/88 25.00 DIETRICKSON -BILL VISUAL ARTS 30- 4224 - 781 -78 t O 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -21 -88 PAGE 12 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. w P.O. M MESSAGE 25.00 » » »ss* *ss —CKS 326E08 11/15/88 97,788.00 EAGAN CONSTRUCTION ARENA 28- 1300 - 000 -00 326E0S 11/15/88 27,572.00 EAGAN CONSTRUCTION ARENA 28- 1300 - 000 -00 125,360.00 * *s » »» * ** —CKS 326E14 11/14/88 700.00 EARL F. ANDERSON PARK BENCHES 10- 1139 - 000 -00 083740 6778 326E14 11/09/88 217.22 EARL F. ANDERSON SIGNS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 83492 7514 917.22 * » » » »* * ** —CKS 326E17 11/08/88 2,149.95 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE INVENTORY 50- 4630- 822 -82 326E17 11/08/88 5,811.45 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 842 -64 326E17 11/08/88 7,530.50 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE INVENTORY 50 -4630- 862 -86 15,491.90 • * * » *» * ** —CKS 326E60 11/14/88 120.00 ELECTRIC MOTOR REP. CONTRACTED REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 702 -70 112462 7618 120.00 * * ** »» * ** —CKS 326F08 11/14/88 251.90 FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL DRUGS 10- 4510 - 440 -44 286790 251.90 * - * * *s *s * ** —CKS 326F11 11/08/88 21212.69 FEED RITE CONTROL WATER SUPPLYS 40- 4622- 805 -80 112646 7583 326F11 11/08/88 120.00— FEED RITE CONTROL CREDIT 40- 4622-805-80 62514 2,092.69 * • * * »** * ** —CKS 326F26 11/15/88 137.34 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 2423 7641 137.34 * * * * *** * ** —CKS 326F56 11/07/88 3,482.00 FRANK B. HALL d CO. INSURANCE 10 -4260- 510 -51 3,482.00 * ** —CKS 326G01 11/14/88 442.35 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 10 -4262- 301 -30 326G01 11/14/88 306.95 G 3 K SERVICES LAUNDRY 10- 4262- 560 -56 326G01 11/14/88 177.12 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 10- 4262- 646 -64 326G01 11/14/88 190.74 G E K SERVICES CLEANING SUPPLY 10 -4512- 540 -54 326G01 11/14/88 49.44 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 28- 4262 - 702 -70 326G01 11/14/88 275.10 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 40- 4262- 801 -80 1988 OF EDINA CHECK dTER 11 -21 -86 IGE 13 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT y VENDOR_ ITEM - DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 9 MESSAGE.._ _N -P_O. 1 , 441 .70 + riiiii - - - - -- r++ -CKS } 326G03 11/09/88 88.28 G T_PARTS _ _ -__ BELTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 23395 736,6._ '- 1 88.28 + _ - - - rrr -CKS 326G16 11/09/88 5.01 GAS SUPPLY INC. SUPPLYS 10- 4540- 646 -64 100801 7310 _ 5.01 �, ririri +r +-CKS 326G24 11/09/88 19.00 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS RENTAL 10- 4226 - 301 -30 29615 i, 326G24 11/09/88 266.25 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS MAINT CONTRACT 10- 4294 - 560 -56 29614 326G24 11/09/88 _ 72.42_ -_ GEN_.__COMMUNI CAT IONS___ CABLE CONNECTOR 10- 4294 - 560 -56 40476 357.67 + - - riiri+ rrr -CKS v 326G32 11/09/88 65.40 GENUINE PARTS CO. MARKER 10 -4620- 560 -56 025662 7492 326G32 _ .- _11/09/88 _ 3.99_ GENUINE PARTS CO. 4620- 560 - 56_065280 7384 326G32 11/09/88 239.40 GENUINE PARTS CO. SNOWBROOM __10- 10- 4620- 560 -56 7384 308.79 + 326633 11/14/88 30.00 GEREBI-LIZ TAPES 30- 4516 - 781-78 sr 30.00 + - 4 irsrrr rrr -CKS 326G43 11/08/88 _ . -_- 28.35 - _GLANDER -EO _ _ MILEAGE - - - — -- 40 -4208- 806 -80 � 28.35 + -- -- — - -- -- - - � r +rrrr - - - -- +rr -CKS v 326G57 11/15/88 85.92 GOPHER OIL CO. REPAIR PARTS 10-4540 - 560 -56 341677 5592 I - - - 85.92 .r - r,,''i 326G58 11/14/88 26.58 GOPHER STAGE LTNG GENERAL SUPPLY 30- 4504 - 782 -78 014812 7610 ~y 326G58 11/07/88 — _ _ _ 115.79 _ _____GOPHER _ STAGE__LTNG - GEN SUP_P_LYS 30 -4504- 782 -78 014806 6482 142.37 • _ _— - - ! �' Y rrr -CKS 326G61 11/15/88 250.00 GORMLEY- RAYMOND GEN SUPPLYS 23- 4504 - 612 -61 - -- - - -- - - - -- - - - - -- 25.0.0 0 - -- �," rsirrr rrr -CKS r 326G68 11/09/88 131.19 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. SUPPLYS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 702223 7523 rr 326G68 11/09/88 85.31 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. SUPPLYS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 698532 7443 326G68 205.92 __ GRAYBAR ELECTRIC _CO. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 540 - 54_699007__7456 =, 326G68 11/09/88 398.31 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. CABLE 10 -4540- 560 -56 692085 7363 326G68 11/09/88 225.75 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. LIGHTS 10- 4540- 646 -64 700108 7494 r v ` 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -21 -88 PAGE . 14 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. #,P.O. B MESSAGE 1,046.48 + 1 *s * *s* s** -CKS ti 326G79 11/15/88 _. 475.00 GREUPNER -JOE_ GEN SUPPLYS___ - 475.00 + 326680 11/15/88 100.00 GREER -PAT EXHIBT FEE - _ _ _.. _ 3073501.- 000 700 ------ 100.00 + * « * * *s * ** -CKS 326692 11/14/88 45.00 GUSTAFSON -KATHY VISUAL ARTS 30 -4224- 781 -78 45.00.+ ._ * « « « *s ** *-CKS 326H31 11/14/88 25.00 HAYWA- PHYLLIS VISUAL ARTS 30- 4224 - 781 -78 25.00 + * « * « ** *** -CKS (2 checks) 326H34 11/08/88_. _- 100.00HENN COUNTY._ TREAS. RUBBISH REMOVAL - _ 1_0- 4250 -- 644 -64 326H34 11/15/88 -. _ _ 21998.53 HENN COUNTY TREAS. SERVICES 10- 4286- 220 -22 18990 3,098.53 + * * « «s* *** -CKS 326H63 11/07/88 174.50 HOFFERS INC PAINT 10- 4544 - 642-64 39784 4437 174.50 + * ** -CKS 326H80 11/14/88 159.27 HOSE INC. HOSES 40- 4540 - 803 -80 H12907 5956 159.27 + * * « * ** * ** -CKS 326I05 11/15/88 60.00 I C M A DUES 10 -4204- 140-14 120347 60.00 + * « «ss* _. -- - - -- - - - -- **• -CKS 326I12 11/14/88 494.15 _ IBM CORPORATION _SERVICE CONTRACT,_._,_ 494.15 + s * *sss *** -CKS 326J08 11/08/88 125.00 J 6 F REDDY RENTS BLDG RENOVATION 25- 4942- 001 -23 42835 3510 125.00 + * « * *** * ** -CKS 326J27 11/08/88 86.41 JERRYS FOODS GENERAL SUPPLYS 23- 4504 - 613 -61 7688 ` 326J27 11/15/88 17.45 JERRYS FOODS CONCESSIONS 29- 4624- 722 -72 x e `Yk i WM�� ?`, {S�� r4 � S�fl �7 10f V. i f4,.Y7,1yyIe�� ,, r. I it I•r 1•i�iri �•1r/4 � <h t,. � ',�1�� +JAR ,T._ ,+T. 'Iyy k�,� l'l I'. 'FBI �i ,t.i; n a 1•� IL� ^',, o�1 T1� -.n. _._.- .. , � .a I' 1988 OF EDINA CHECK STER 11 -21 -86 .GE 15 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 103.86 + *sr » ** * *s—CKS kw — 326J31 11/15/88 - 115.87 JERRYS HARDWARE REPAIR PARTS - - - - -- - 10- 4540 - 560 -56 - - - - -- - -- - - -- -- - - 115.87 r -- - - - - -- � v r * * *s* *r* —CKS 326J41 11/09/88 99.72 JIM HATCH SALES MANURE FORK 10 -4580- 301 -30 6746 7360 99.72 + *rss *s *r *—CKS 326K09 11/14/88 15.06 KAMAN BEARING d $PLY REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540-801-80 650599 7355 k_., 15.06 + s *s »ss r*r —CKS 326K35 11/15/88 6.99 KNOX LUMBER CO. GENERAL SUPPLYS_ ___ ___ 10- 4504 - 646 -64 602098 7636 326K35 11/15/88 11.45 KNOX LUMBER CO. GEN SUPPLYS 10- 4504-647-64 629568 7631 326K35 11/15/88 69.99 KNOX LUMBER CO. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 648 -64 629587 326K35 11/14/88 _ _ 15.98 _ _ KNOX LUMBER CO. LUMBER 10- 4604-646-64 602128 7569 326K35 11/08/88 18.55 KNOX LUMBER CO. BLDG RENOVATION 25- 4942-001 -23 629760 7516 326K35 11/14/88 19.39 KNOX LUMBER CO. MAIL BOX 60- 2040 - 044 -08 629545 7619 - 142.35 + - -- " ' ss *srs s*s —CKS 326K45 11/08/88 9.90 KOKESH ATHLETIC GEN SUPPLYS 30- 4504 - 782 -78 17920 7679 9.90 + s *asst *s* —CKS 326K57 11/08/88 2,575.25 KUETHER DIST. CO. INVENTORY 50- 4630-822 -82 326K57 11/08/88 5,081.06 KUETHER DIST. CO. INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 842 -84 ♦, I- 7,656.31 + V s *s *rr ** *—CKS 326K63 11/15/88 171.51 KUSTOM ELECTRONICS - LEASE 10- 4901 - 420 -42 171 .51 • - - - - -- - - -- V * ** —CKS �►. "� 326L02 11/15/88 1,420.06 LABOR RELATIONS ASN. SERVICES 10 -4212- 510 -51 r 1,420.06 * rrr —CKS 326L04 11/07/88 564.00 LAHASS CORPORATION SHOES 10- 4620 - 560 -56 1238 7554 v 564.00 + �_ j »r »r »r — - - -- --- -- - - - - -- -- -------------- - - - - -- — — -- 000—CKS _ _ 326L28 /09/8_ _1140V 177.61 LA4SON._PR0DUCTS SUPPLYS 10- 4504 = 301 -30 103118 7217__ _.. v � 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -21 -88 PAGE 16 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE _ 326L28 11/09/88 175.57 LAWSON PRODUCTS SUPPLYS 10- 4504-322-30 103118 7215 326L28 11/09/88 143.94 LAWSON PRODUCTS SUPPLYS 10- 4504- 325 -30 103118 7213 326L28 11/09/88 455.35 LAWSON PRODUCTS SUPPLYS 10 -4504- 646 -64 103118 7216 326L28 11/09/88 6.92 LAWSON PRODUCTS SUPPLYS 10- 4620- 560 -56 7212 326L28 11/09/88 357.21 LAWSON PRODUCTS SUPPLYS 10- 4620- 560 -56 103195 7437 326L28 11/09/88 263.11 LAWSON PRODUCTS SUPPLYS 10- 4620- 560 -56 103195 7436 326L28 11/09/88 277.87 LAWSON PRODUCTS SUPPLYS 40- 4504 - 803-80 103195 6940 326L28 11/09/88 360.12 LAWSON PRODUCTS SUPPLYS _ 40-4540- 801 -80 103195 6939 326L28 11/09/88 126.79 LAWSON PRODUCTS SUPPLYS 40- 4540 - 803-80 103118 7214 2,344.49 * *s -CKS 326L34 11/08/88 15.15 LEEF BROS. INC. MAINT 23- 4201 - 61.2 -61 645290 15.15 :26L46 11/15/88 151,75 LIEN INFECTION CON SERVICES 27- 4201 - 663 -66 326L46 11/15/88 134.00 LIEN INFECTION CON SERVICE CONTRACT 27- 4288 - 667 -66 - -- - - -- 285.75 * * » » » »* *** -CKS 326M07 11/08/88 3,372.81 MARK VII SALES INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 822 -82 326M07 11/08/88. .- 6,212.62 MARK VII SALES INVENTORY,_ 326M07 11/08/88 4,138.25 MARK VII SALES INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 862 -86 13,723.68 » » » » *» * ** -CKS 326M11 11/14/88 100.00 MARTIN- MCALLISTER SERVICES 10 -4201- 440 -44 1690 100.00 326M12 11/08/88 73.81 MATHISON CO. COST OF COMM 23- 4624- 613 -61 101477 7060 73.81 ;,. 326M16 11/14/88 970.34 MCCAREN DESIGNS PROF SERVICES 30- 4224- 782-78 326M16 11/14/88 826.88 MCCAREN DESIGNS PROF SERVICES 30- 4224 - 782 -78 326M16 11/14/88 960.54 MCCAREN DESIGNS PLANTINGS d TREES 30- 4560- 782 -78 15786 7587 ;. 2,757.76 * » * » *» * ** -CKS 326M22 11/09/88 100.00 MCNEILUS STEEL STEEL 10- 4504 - 301 -30 49633 7432 326M22 11/09/88 200.00 MCNEILUS STEEL STEEL 10- 4504 - 314 -30 49633 7432 ' 326M22 11/09/88 150.90 MCNEILUS STEEL STEEL 40 -4504- 803 -80 49633 7432 450.90 » * * » » »» * ** -CKS 326M25 11/14/88 4.65 MED OXYGEN 6 EQUIP EQUIP MAINT 10 -4274- 440 -44 059999 326M25 11/14/88 36.21 MED OXYGEN & EQUIP FIRST AID 10 -4510- 440 -44 059999 WiIq.��, R. 1988 . Y OF EDINA CHECK ISTER 11-21 -6 AGE 17 CHECK NO. DATE. ._ -___ ___. AMOUNT __VENDOR _ - ITEM_ DESCRIPTI.ON__ ACCOUNT_ N-0. I NV. M _P_.0._ A MESSAGE 1y 40.86 + rrr -CKS 326M27 11/15/88 342.25 MERIT SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4504 - 648 -64 20348 7581 326M27 11/09/88 437.25 MERIT SUPPLY 101 CLEANER 10- 4620- 560 -56 20257 7440 326M27 11/14/88 481.40 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLY 30- 4504 - 782 -78 20340 7685 1,260.90 • - - - - ssrrsr sss -CKS 326M31 11/09/88 54.60 METRO FONE COMM. PAGER RENTAL 40- 4504 - 801 -80 287568 54.80 + _ rrr -CKS 326M35 11/08/88_ 11089.00 _ METRO--NASTE CONTROL BLDG PERMIT___ -___ 10- 3095 - 000 -00 1,089.00 • rrrsrr __ rss -CKS 326M46 11/14/88 83.55 METZ BAKING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD 27 -4624- 663 -66 3747 326M46 11/15/88 77.12 METZ BAKING CO CONCESSIONS 27 -4624- 663 -66 •r► -CKS r` `, 326M60 11/09/88 69.15 MILWAUKEE TOOL CO. TAPER 10- 4540 - 540 -54 255284 7374 69.15 • v rrsssr •rr -CKS 326M63 11/14/88 167.80 MN. BAR INVENTORY 50- 4632- 822 -62 v, 326M63 11/08/88 286.15 MN. BAR INVENTORY 50- 4632 - 842 -84 a 326M63 11/14/88 335.78 MN. BAR INVENTORY - - -- 50- 4632 - 862 786 i 789.73 • v � 326M69 11/14/88 63.00 MN. CLAY CONT REPAIR 23- 4248 - 612-61 10606 7415 -a 326M69 11/14/88 228.70 MN. CLAY - -- - CRAFT SUPPLIES - — 23 -4588- 611-61 10567 7589 - 291.70 + -- - -- - -- - - - -- -- - -- -- 326M70 11/14/88 54.00 _- MN. CONWAY CONT REPAIR _ 10 -4248- 440 -44 10242 326M70 11/14/88 114.00 MN. CONWAY CHEMICALS 10 -4274- 440 -44 121845 326M70 11/14/88 39.50 MN. CONWAY GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 440 -44 10242 a 326M70 _ _ 11/14/88 _ _ 154.00 _ MN. CONWAY _ .__ _CLOT_ HING_ REP 10-4574-440-44 10242 361.50 • rrr -CKS vl 326M76 11/09/88 144.60 MN. GLOVE GLOVES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 7431 a --14-4.60--s �,, ••rrr+ *00-CKS • 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -21 -88 PAGE 18 L CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION i ACCOUNT NO. INV. 8 P.O. M MESSAGE v 326M80 11/07/88 58.00 MN. SUBURBAN NEWS ADVERTISING 10- 4210-140-14 326M80 11/08/88 81.25 MN. SUBURBAN NEWS ADVERTISING 10- 4212 - 510-51 56188 139.25 * 326M81 11/15/88 1,980.00 MN. TORO INC. IRRIGATION SYST 27- 4201 - 664 -66 733671 7396 326MB1 11/15/88 6.70 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 733619 7607 1,986.70 * kkskkk *** -CKS 326MSS 11/14/88 1,533.00 MN. WANNER BLEACHER RAILINGS 10- 1139 - 000 -00 070783 7616 326M85 11/08/88 3,949.00 MN. WANNER BLEACHERS 10- 4201 - 647 -64 070782 7604 5,482.00 * kkkkkk k*k -CKS 326M93 11/14/68 21920.00 MOTOROLA ACCT REC 10-1139- 000 -00 319279 6576 326M93 11/14/88 250.80 �mo000 MOTOROLA FIRST AID 10- 4510 - 440 -44 319279 6576 3,170.80* 3,!T-o 00 k :2*:N**O: **k -CKS 11/15/88 1,740.00 MPLS SEWER & WATER CONTRACTED REPAIRS 40-4248-803-86_20732 7640 1,740.00 * kkkkkk .. k*k -CKS 326N07 11/15/88 264.33 MTS NW SOUND GEN SUPPLYS 30-4504 - 782 -78 70552 7759 264.33 * kkkkkk *kk -CKS _. 326N68 11/08/88 110.50 NORTHSTAR ICE INVENTORY 50-4632- 822 -82 326N68 11/08/88 243.50 NORTHSTAR ICE INVENTORY 50- 4632- 842-84 326N68 11/14/88 290.00 NORTHSTAR ICE INVENTORY 50- 4632 - 862 -86 644.00 * k #k #k# kk* -CKS 326N72 11/09/88 1,228.62 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES 10- 4616 - 560 -56 1,228.62 * kkkkkk *** -CKS 326NS2 11/14/88 24.00 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY CRAFT SUPPLIES 23- 4588- 611 -61 153786 7414 326N82 11/08/88 12.88 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST OF COMM 23- 4624- 613 -61 153462 5363 326N82 11/08/88 158.45 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST OF COMM 23- 4624-613 -61 153623 7413 195.33 * kkkkkk *** -CKS 326908 110,15/$$ $$4.10 2" ' ." —* OBE.NTMA68 GUNS lNG. UNIFORMS 10 -4266 -430 ;2- kkkkkk kkk -CKS i I • 1988 Y OF ED I NA CHECK ISTER 11 -21 -i ,AGE 19 CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR _ITEM DESCRIPTION_ ACCOUNT _NO. INV. _N_P.O..M MESSAGE 326017 11/14/68 130.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248-440 -44 063101 7420 326017 11/07/88 41.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS SERVICE CONTRACTS _ 10 -4288- 510 -51 063972 7598 326017 11/14/88 260.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540-440 -44 063101 7420 326017 11/07/88 - 198.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS - SERVICES. CON TRACTS._ __27 -4 662- 66_6.3528 629.00 * -200- �I **s -CKS 326030 11/08/88 52.72 OLD DUTCH FOODS CHIPS 27- 4624 - 663 -66 _ 52.72 + **t -CKS 326037 11/15/88 45.00 BILL OLSON DIRT 40- 4504 - 803 -80 326037 11/15/88 45.00- BILL OLSON DIRT 40- 4504-823 -80 326037 11/15/88- _ _ __45.00 BILL OLSON DIRT _ 40- 4504 - 823 -80 45.00 + - -- - - - -- - -- - - - a *t -CKS �- - v 326P11 11/15/88 64.00 PARK NIC MED CTR PHY EXAM 10- 4246-300 -30 326P11 11/15/88 _ __. _- 32.00 PARK NIC MED CTR PHY EXAM - 420 -42 i 326P11 11/15/88 80.00 PARK NIC MED CTR PHY EXAM __10-4246 10- 4246- 640 -64 _ v 176.00 :ssss# -- - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - -- - - - _ sst -CKS v, 326P25 11/15/88 - _ _-12,394,.00_ -_ PEAK CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION - 60- 1300 - 012 -20 12,394.00-* - L; * #ssss *** -CKS • 326P30 11/14/88 244.75 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY 50- 4632- 822-82 326P30 11/08/88 410.75 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY 50- 4632- 842 -84 326P30 11/14/88 244.45 ._- - PEPSI COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY 50- 4632- 8fi2-B6 - ... - -- - v+ 899.95 + *t* -CKS v - 326P35 11/14/88 _ __.63.66 PETERSON - BARBARA., - __MILEAGE 30 -4208- 781 -78 63.68 + _. ___ - - v 326P36 11/15/88 _ _ _ 8.17 PETTY CASH CABLE TV. 10 -2148- 000 -00 326P36 11/15/88 5.00 PETTY CASH SCHOOL 10- 4202 - 504 -50 - - -_ __ - -- 326P36 11/15/88 2.75 PETTY CASH PARKING 10- 4204 - 120 -12 326P36 -_ 11/15/88 - _12.00 PETTY CASH PARKING 10 -4204- 600 -60 326P36 11/15/88 24.55 PETTY CASH MEETING EXP _ 10 -4206- 140 -14 yj 326P36 11/15/88 21.56 PETTY CASH MEETING EXP 10 -4206- 160 -16 326P36 11/15/88 16.00 _ PETTY CASH MEETING EXP 10- 4206- 200- 20____ 326P36 11/15/88 13.38 PETTY CASH MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 160 -16 326P36 11/15/88 6.12 PETTY CASH MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 800 -80 326P36 11/15/88 _65.05 _ __PETTY CASH - -_ -----.----MEETING EXP 10- 4212- 510 -51 326P36 326P36 11/15/88 11/15/88 5.77 PETTY CASH SHIPPING 10- 4504 - 160 -16 �,�' 14.46 PETTY CASH GEN SUPPLYS 10- 4504 - 510 -51 ;.� 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -21 -88 PAGE 20 CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. M MESSAGE 326P36 11/15/88 1.39 PETTY CASH GEN SUPPLYS 10- 4504 - 520 -52 ?_ 326P36 11/15/88 47.22 PETTY CASH GEN SUPPLYS 10- 4504 - 627 -62 326P36 11/15/88 10.14 PETTY CASH GEN SUPPLYS 10- 4504 - 646 -64 326P36 11/15/88 8.70 PETTY CASH PARKING 10- 4506- 140 -14 " 326P36 11/15/88 5.04 PETTY CASH PAPER SUPPLYS 10-4514- 510 -51 326P36 11/15/88 29.72 PETTY CASH GEN SUPPLYS 28- 4504-702 -70 �= 326P36 11/15/88 8.99 PETTY CASH GEN SUPPLYS 40-4504- 801 -60 306.01 + i #si #i *** -CKS 326P48 11/14/88 22.40 PIP PRINTING PRINTING 30- 4600 - 781 -78 3762 7693 -. 326P48 11/15/88 352.20 PIP PRINTING PRINTING 30- 4600- 781 -78 3736 7767 326P48 11/09/88 22.50 PIP PRINTING PRINTING 30- 4600- 781 -78 3707 326P48 11/15/88 40.15 PIP PRINTING PRINTING 30- 4600 - 781 -78 3799 7771 437.25 + s ** -CKS 326P58 11/07/88 27.20 PLUNKETTS. GEN.SUPPLYS,__ -- _---- 4504 - 702 -70 551324 27.20 s _- _,.28- - - ... - « # #irr - , sss -CKS 326P70 11/15/88 100.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 10-4290- 510 -51 100.00 + +++-CKS 326078 11/14/88 65.00 PRINTERS SERV INC EQUIP MAINT 28- 4274 - 704 -70 31267 65.00 + C. -- * *+-CKS 32086 _1-1/14/88 272.25 - PROG.CONSULTING ENG CONTRACTED REPAIRS 40 -4248- 801 -80 7634 272.25 - - -- -- - -- - _ -- s *s -CKS 326009 11/07/88 106.44 QUALITY REFRIG. REPAIRS 27-4200- 663 -66 60947 7615 106.44 + s «i «is *s* -CKS 326022 11/07/88 16.45 QUIK PRINT PRINTING - 28- 4600 - 701-70 - 030927 7606 16.45 + E -- - - - - -- - - - - -- **r -CKS 326R13 11/14/88 __- 132.00 „- RADIO INSTALLS _ EQUIP,' RENTAL 10- 4226 - 440744 12527 132.00 + - -- - - -- - ---- ---------- - - - - -- -- _ ss -CKS E 326R15 11/15/88 570.53 RAINBOW LEASING RENTAL 10- 4226- 507 -50 M61503 ry�ltfArk7Ua� i�� ,�. ..Ii f,�° l , 1988 V OF EDINA CHECK ISTER 11 -21 -L AGE 21 I' CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION_ AOCOUNT_NO__INV. 0- P.O. M MESSAGE 570.53 + sss « «s *s* -CKS 326R21_ 11/14/88 98.55 RED WING SHOES LAUNDRY 10- 4262- 301 -30 134806 326R21 11/14/88 98.55 RED WING SHOES LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 560 -56 134806 326R21 11/14/88 319.40 RED WING SHOES LAUNDRY 10- 4262- 646 -64 134806 516.50 ss « «ss sss -CKS 326R27 11/07/88 70.00 REPYA PETTY CASH 10- 1030 - 000 -00 70.00 + ss «s «« - - -- - - -- - -- -- sss-CKS 326R33 11/14/88 _ - 2,773.15 REX DISTR. INVENTORY 50- 4630- 822-82 326R33 11/14/88 3,967.77 REX DISTR. INVENTORY 50- 4630- 842 -84 326R33 11/14/88 3,663.35 REX DISTR. INVENTORY 50-4630- 862 -86 _ .10,404.27 * _ u ss «sss sss -CKS 326R35 11/08/88 950.00 RICHFIELD PLUMB & CO DRINKING FOUNT 10 -1139- 000 -00 7018 7596 326R35 11/15/88 22.00 RICHFIELD PLUMB d CO GEN SUPPLYS 30- 4504 - 782 -78 4931 6787 _ 972.0.0_ * - - -- - ssssss sss -CKS 326R77 11/14/88 114.80 ROYAL CROWN BEV. INVENTORY 50- 4632 - 642-84 �r 326R77 11/14/68 122.00 ROYAL CROWN BEV. INVENTORY 50- 4632-862 -86 236.80 * - - `, ssssss ■ ** -CKS 326R79 11/08/68 18.75 RTW INC. INSURANCE 10 -4260- 510-51 �. 18.75 + _ * ** -CKS 326RS1 - 11/08/88 _ 123.81 RUBENSTEIN 6 -ZIFF CRAFT SUPPLYS 23- 4516-611_ - 61_120964 7588 326R81 11/08/88 120.45 RUBENSTEIN & ZIFF COST COMM 23- 4624- 613 -61 120964 7588 �. 244.26 + ssssss sss -CKS V 326523 _- --_ _ 1 1 /15/ @8___ _401 .12- -_ --- SERVI CEMASTER ._ .—CARPET-- CLEAN 27- 4201 - 662 -66 95754_7676 _ 401.12 + -- V ssssss _ * ** -CKS 326527 11/09/88 114.00 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 10 -4504- 343 -30 50472 7358 ____SHERWIN_ WILLIAMS _ _SUPPLIES — 10- 4504 -_ 646 - 64_3355767526 326527 11/07/88 81.46 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 10- 4544 - 646 -64 36711 7275 213.84 + u • 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -21 -88 PAGE 22 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. M-P.O. 0 MESSAGE •rat *�# __ - __ •�• -CKS L 326536 11/08/88 1,648.65 SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO. INVENTORY 50 -4630- 822 -82 ' 326536 11/14/88_ 51928.10 SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO. INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 842 -84 326536 11/08/88 156.50 SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO. ____ INVENTORY 50- 4630- 862 -86 7,733.25 • ' ssFR�s •** -CKS 326539 11/15/88 _- SI_ITARI- MICHAEL EQUIPMENT 10- 4572 - 420 -42 131.20 ------------ •** -CKS 326se5, a1iariaa ai 98- ST PAUL BOOK OFFICE SUPPLYS 10- 4516 - 510 -51 °�{5 326 32kS45 1 i X07188 11 /O:zJ4A 6 a5 6rocz- ST aeu - a ROOK ST. 12AU1 -BOOK OEETCF SUFF?l YS -- OFFICE 6 1 -1 p p L y 30 -4516= 781 -78 30-4r516 -- 781 76 990141 - 890141 - _ 326845 11/07/88 6.35 ST. PAUL BOOK OFFICE SUPPLYS 30- 4516 - 781 -78 890141 - 326545 11/07/88 11.70 ST.. PAUL BOOK OFFICE SUPPLIES. ..__._30- 451, -6- 781 - 78_.890 138_ 18.05 *43m - -1 _- •sss�� s*• -CKS 326553 11/14/88 60.89 STANS.DOOR SERVICE EQUIP MAINT 50- 4274- 861 -86 9092 60.89 + 326554 11/15/88 125.79 STAR 6 TRIBUNE ADVERTISING 10 -4212- 510 -51 125.79 • •ar *sf *** -CKS 326556 11/09/88 35.09 STARK ELECTRONICS SUPPLYS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 408330,7361 _ 326556 11/09/88 71.95 STARK ELECTRONICS SUPPLYS 27- 4540 - 663 -66 409010 7392 107.04 Cs •ass *� *** -CKS 326561 11/08/88 21683.45 STATE TREASURER BLDG PERMIT 10- 3095 - 000 -00 326861 11/08/88 123.50 STATE TREASURER SUR CHG TAX 10- 3113 - 000 -00 2,806.95 + ss�ss• * ** -CKS 326572 11/15/88 69.50 STREICHERS AMMO 10 -4572- 420 -42 M55198 7690 326572 11/15/88 100.45 STREICHERS RANGE SUPPLYS 10- 4572- 420 -42 M55287 7614 169.95 • E 326573 11/08/88 1,334.77 STRGAR- ROSCOE -FAUSH TRAFFIC ENG 10- 4201-260 -26 088109 1,334.77 E •�� *ss • ** -CKS 326578 11/09/88 181.45 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP PIPE 10- 4540 - 540 -54 7365 C " 326578 11/09/88 7.83 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540-560 -56 137672 r;,,1 owl � �, i ; 1 r - an M ` �. � f '�-, r � ��'�r0 • T y 7 I k a iii i �]�i � �A� a�� ,. �o-��, `fd'iir -`y�r� ns�,, } �5.• ",•' "ay,a- 011 • ..- ..'�P��'� _ :!•. @ 11. ..I II al ,l.l 11 b 1 �, 4 "- �1� d t ;�. 1988 L_ OF EDINA CHECK $TER 11 -21 -8! ,GE 23 .• CHECK N0. DATE_ AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO_ INV_ 8_P.O. N MESSAGE _ - -- 189.28 • i•i•ii - _ ***-CKS ` 326S92 11/15/88- _ 101.68 -1- 00-08- _ SYSTEM SUPPLY COMPUTER SUPPLYS - 10 -4504510 51 101.68* 100-06 - - - - - - - --- -- — - - -- u ii•iii -- ssi -CKS "- �. 326S95 11/15/88 49.09 SERVICE SALES CORP OFFICE SUPPLYS 50- 4516 - 820 -82 22347 326595 11/15/88 49.09 SERVICE SALES CORP OFFICE SUPLYS 50 -4516- 840 -84 22347___ 326S95 11/15/88 49.09 SERVICE SALES CORP OFFICE SUPPLYS 50- 4516 - 860 -86 22347 �. 147.27 + 326596 11/15/88 80.00 SCHUENEMAN -AMY SERVICES 27- 4201 - 662 -66 .. 80.00 • ssssss sss -CKS 326T01 11/09/88_ _- 15.92 TANDY_CONSUMER SERV. GEN SUPPLY — _ 4504 - 180-18 3665417543 t 15.92 + _1.0- - •ssisi • *s -CKS v 326TO8 11/15/88 59.99 TARGET SUPPLYS 10- 4504 - 500 -50 �. ••• -CKS � 326T19 11/07/88 3,503.85 THE PIRKL ASSOC. CONSTRUCTION 2 7- 1300-003 -00 1.. 3, 503 .85 • a sss -CKS 326T29 _ _ 11/14/88. -_ 12,990.95 THOMSEN- NYBECK LEGAL FEES 10- 4201 - 220 -22 816012 a 326T29 11/14/88 11,438.08 THOMSEN- NYBECK LEGAL FEES 10- 4201 - 220 -22 884179 24,429.03 + 326T30 11/08/88 7,669.20 76.69 THORPE DISTR. INVENTORY 50- 4630-662 -86 7,669.20* - :?6 --69 -� i iii #ti -- - - -- - - - - -- +ii -CKS -- 326T40- 11/09/88 41.73 _TOLL COMPANY _ _ -_ GEN SUPPLY 40- 4504 - 8-01 -80 034012_5012 41.73 + sssssi sss -CKS 326T68 11/08/88 39.03 TRIO SUPPLY CO INVENTORY 50- 4632- 862 -86 -- - - - - - - - - -- -39.03 + +•• -CKS � 326T78 11/08/88 390.00 TWIGS DELI CONCESSIONS 30- 3470 - 000 -00 1544 7676 . °, 326T78 11/08/88 9.50 TWIGS DELI MISC 30 -3470- 000 -00 1556 7677 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -21 -88 PAGE 24 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 326T78 11/08/88 15.50 TWIGS DELI LAUNDRY 30- 4262- 782 -78 1556 7677 326T78 11/08/88 3.79 TWIGS DELI OFFICE SUPPLYS 30- 4516 - 781 -78 1556 7677 418.79 * ** # #* * ** -CKS l ..' 326T88 11/14/88 16.32 TWIN CITY HOME JUICE INVENTORY .50- 4632- 862 -86 16.32 # ** -CKS _ 326T91 11/14/88 309.55 TWIN CITY TESTING AIR SAMPLING 40- 4248 - 801 -80 - 7644 1 309.55 - - * ** -CKS 326T96 11/14/88 67.00 TWIN CITY GAR._ DOOR CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248- 440 -44 42321 7497 326T96 11/14/88 37.85 TWIN CITY GAR. DOOR REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 440 -44 42321 7497 104.85 t + t*s # ## * ** -CKS ` 326UO8 11/15/88 224.10 UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 10- 4266- 430 -42 326U08 11/15/88 1.325.92 UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 10 -4266- 420 -42 326U08 11/15/88 244.1.0 UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORMS _ 10- 4266-430-42 326U08 11/15/88 244.10- UNIFORM UNLIMITED 'UNIFORMS 10- 4266- 430-42 + 326UOS 11/15/88 -_ 690.00 _ UNIFORM UNLIMITED AMMO 10- 4572-420-42 - 326U08 11/15/88 10.90 UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 30- 4262 - 782 -78 10517 7774 2,250.92* 2, 426 82 9 - - - -- * **-CKS 326U14. 11/15/88 200.65. UNITED ELECTRIC CORP -- LITES. 27- 4504 - 662 -66 32747 5980 326U14 11/09/88 129.73 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP SUPPLYS 46-4540-601-66.810604 7421 330.38 * #*t ## ** *-CKS 326U20- 11/15/88 _ " "- 60.00 UNIVERSITY. OF MN SCHOOL -- 1.0- 42027240 -24 438089 60.00 * # # # ## + *+ -CKS 326VIO 11/07/88 331.36 VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PROPANE 28- 4612 - 704 -70 W 331.36 t *t* -CKS v 326VIS 11/07/88 279.10 VAN PAPER CO. PAPER SUPPLYS 10- 4514- S20 -52 230715 7600 279.10 • **t -CKS � J 326V46 11/14/88 411.69 VESSCO PUMP PARTS 40 -4540- 801 -80 5287 7562 411.69 • -- - - - - - -- -- - - — - **# # **... *t* -CKS I I .:I .�: ... . ,I... i. it I : .{ e.'��' L..,. . I .c I- - i , - n. Yi _ ,. 1� 1� .�...� ry•.I ' I«1988 . Y OF EDINA CHECK .ISTER 11 -21 -8� PAGE 25 1 � CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT -.... VENDOR _ _ ITEM DESCRIPTION_ _ ACCOUNT N0._INV. N P.O. 9 MESSAGE 326V80 11/09/88 83.10 VOSS ELECTRIC SUP SUPPLYS 10 -4504- 540 -54 240860 7202 326V80 11/09/88 148.64 VOSS ELECTRIC SUP BULBS 27- 4504 - 667 -66 240593 5222 326V80 11/09/88 57.96 VOSS ELECTRIC SUP BULBS 50- 4504 - 820 -82 241080 7287 289.70 • s «s « «s sss -CKS 326W08 11/15/88 233.00 W.W. GRAINGER GEN SUPPLY$ 27- 4504 - 662 -66 _ 326W08 11/09/88 102.41 W.W. GRAINGER SPLIT 48 OPEN 40- 4540 - 802 -80 035262 7490 335.41 • - - - _, s * « «s« ass -CKS 326W25 11/15/88 121.50 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 10- 4250 - 301 -30 _ 326W25 11/15/88 52.79 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 10- 4250 - 440 -44 326W25 11/15/88 65.44 _ WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE _RUBBISH REMOVAL 10- 4250 - 520 -52 326W25 11/15/88 121.50 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE RUBBISH __ REMOVAL 10- 4250 - 540 -54 326W25 11/15/88 211.30 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 10- 4250 - 645 -64 326W25 11/15/88 52.82 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 10- 4250 - 645 -64 326W25 11/15/88 26.38 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE RUBBISH _ -- REMOVAL 23 -4250- 612 -61 _ 326W25 11/15/88 26.38- WASTE MGMT - SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 23 -4250- 612 -61 326W25 _11/15/88 _ 26.38 - _. WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 23- 4250 - 612 -61 326W25 11/15/88 26.38 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 23- 4250 - 612 -61 326W25 11/15/88 26.38 WASTE MGMT - SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 23- 4250 - 612 -61 326W25 11/15/88 79.24 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE _ RUBBISH REMOVAL_ 26- 4250- 682 -68 326W25 11/15/88 79.24 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 26- 4250 - 682 -68 326W25 11/15/88 79.24- WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 26- 4250 - 682 -68 326W25 _ _ _ 1 1 /15/88_ ..__- _ _ 79.24- WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 26 -4250- 682 -68 326W25 11/15/88 79.24 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE RUBBISH _ REMOVAL 26- 4250- 682 -68 326W25 11/15/88 211.27- WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 27- 4250 - 662 -66 I 326W25 11/15/88 211.27 _ -_- WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE _ RUBBISH REMOVAL 27- 4250 - 662 -66 326W25 11/15/88 211.27 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE RUBBISH _ REMOVAL 27- 4250 - 662 -66 326W25 11/15/88 211.27 WASTE MGMT - SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 27 -4250- 662 -66 326W25 _ 11/15/88 _ -_ _. 211.27- WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 27- 4250 - 662 -66 326W25 11/15/88 211.27- WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 27- 4250 - 663 -66 _ 326W25 11/15/88 211.27 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 27- 4250 - 663 -66 326W25 ._11/15/88 _.._ 52.79 __- WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 27- 4250 - 664 -66 326W25 11/15/88 52.79 WASTE MGMT - SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 27 -4250- 664 -66 v 326W25 11/15/88 52.79- WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 27- 4250 - 664 -66 326W25 _ . - _ 11/15/88 _ . _ 158.60- _ WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 28- 4250- 702 -70 326W25 11/15/88 158.60 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE RUBBISH RREMOVAL 28- 4250 - 702 -70 326W25 11/15/88 158.60 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 28- 4250 - 702 -70 326W25 11/15/88 - - -_- _..._.....158.60 -_- WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE _ RUBBISH REMOVAL- - 30 -4250- 782 -78 326W25 11/15/88 280.60 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 50- 4250 - 841 -84 326W25 11/15/88 280.60- WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 50- 4250 - 860 -86 326W25._. 11/15/88 _280.60 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE_ RUBBISH REMOVAL 50- 4250 - 860 -86 326W25 11/15/88 280.60 WASTE MGMT - SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 50- 4250 - 861 -86 .- 1,873.43 s �- •s « «s• - -- - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - -- - - -- - sss -CKS 326W28 11/09/88 145.30 _ WATER PRODUCTS _ _ COPPER 40-4504- 803 -80 079611 7356_ 326W28 11/09/88 30.05 WATER PRODUCTS SUPPLY$ 40-4540-803-80_079480 7308 1_7 326W28 11/09/88 193.95 WATER PRODUCTS SUPPLYS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 079301 7294 ,I 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -21 -88 PAGE 26 • ssr -CKS I i rrrrrr _ CLEANER _ 27-4504- 664 -66 03768 _7399 _ • 326201 _- 11/07/88 30.00 - .— ZACKS_IND 10- 4540-560 -56 33325A 7079 CLEAT sss -CKS • 30.00 r ART CENTER CAPITAL FUND • _ SWIMMING POOL FUND rrrrrr RECREATION CENTER FUND • ' 328WS4 11/09/88 178.25 WM H ZIEGLER Cl UTILITY FUND - -. - -- - -- 178.25 • — -- - -- - -- CONSTRUCTION FUND rrrrrr V 3£5296 426 58 FUND 10 TOTAI v 3,620.04 FUND 23 TOTAI [yv w 12,434.50 FUND 25 TOTAI w 118.84 - -_ --- -_FUND 26 TOTAI w 12,278.08 FUND 27 TOTAI r; 143,118.26 FUND 28 TOTAI _ 369.01 _ _._ FUND 29 TOTAI 9,573.86 FUND 30 TOTAI 9,376.69 FUND 40 TOTAI _. 77,096.52 6,50+4..01 FUND 50 TOTAI 59,690.43 59,750.13 - FUND 60 TOTAI TOTAL-- - fir !- i i • ssr -CKS • _ CLEANER _ 27-4504- 664 -66 03768 _7399 _ • - - - -- ssr -CKS CYLINDER 10- 4540-560 -56 33325A 7079 • sss -CKS • GENERAL FUND ART CENTER CAPITAL FUND • _ SWIMMING POOL FUND GOLF COURSE FUND RECREATION CENTER FUND • GUN RANGE FUND EDINBOROUGH PARK UTILITY FUND 4 _ LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND CONSTRUCTION FUND V V APPROMIM PAYMM -- — v / PAM w w t w w ii 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -31 -88 PAGE 1 a.. „ CHEC DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. SSAGE �. 274686 11/03/88 7,356.93 GROUP HEALTH INVENTORY 10- 4156- 510 -51 MANUAL 7,356.93 • y eee }ee rrr -CKS 277F14 11/03/88 13,065.20 FIDELITY BANK FICA 10- 4149 - 510 -51 MANUAL a. 277F14 11/03/88 13,065.20- FIDELITY BANK FICA 10- 4149 - 510 -51 MANUAL 277F14 11/03/88 13,065.17 FIDELITY BANK FICA 10-4149- 510 -51 MANUAL 277F14 11/03/88 427.48 FIDELITY BANK MEDICARE 10- 4162 - 510 -51 MANUAL �. 13,492.6S r serest o**-CKS a. 27SC33 11/03/88 340,000.00 HRA HRA 10 -1145- 000 -00 MANUAL 340,000.00 • i •ess►r _ rrr -CKS s 278E11 11/03/68 160.29 EAGLE WINE INVENTORY 50 -4632- 862 -66 MANUAL 278E11 11/04/88 .160.29- EAGLE WINE INVENTORY 50- 4632- 862-86 MANUAL .00 + eeees• - - - - rrr -CKS ti. 278E26 11/03/88 18.50 ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY 50- 4630- 842 -84 MANUAL 18.50 + kti «seses •rr -CKS 278E33 11/04/88 163.56 EAGLE WINE INVENTORY 50 -4632- 862 -86 MANUAL �+ 163.56 + rr «err }}}-CKS 1S► 278F14 11/03/88 2,478.86 FIDELITY BANK FICA 10 -4149- 510-51 MANUAL 278F14 11/03/88 39.05 FIDELITY BANK FICA 10- 4149- S10 -51 MANUAL O. 278F14 11/03/88 27.28- FIDELITY BANK OVERPAYMENT 10 -4162- 510 -S1 MANUAL - 2,490.63 • __ rrrr «s •rr -CKS 278L80 11/03/88 130.00 LYNDALE GARDENS GENERAL SUPPLY3 10- 4504 - 627 -62 MANUAL 4r 130.00 + « «rsss - - *00-CKS 270P82 11/03/88 _ -18.59 _ __PRIOR WINE INVENTORY _ _ _ _ 504628- 822 -82 MANUAL .278P82 11/03/88 86.14 PRIOR WINE INVENTORY 50- 4632- 822 -82 MANUAL mr 104.73 + errrrs *o*-CKS er 284739 ____11/03/88____ 9,102,S20.24 TITLE INS CO MN _- _HEDBERG PROP - _ 10 -1145- 000 -00 MANUAL 9,102,520.24 • 4. «rrssr- -- -- - - - - -- — - - - - - - -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - •«• -CKS 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -31-88 PAGE 2 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. 0 MESSAGE b 284873 11/03/88 108.75 GOLF PETTY CASH SALARIES 27 -4120- 663 -66 MANUAL 284B73 11/03/88 213.38 GOLF PETTY CASH SALARIES 27- 4120 - 666 -66 MANUAL `. 284B73 11/03/88 50.00 GOLF PETTY CASH SERVICES 27-4201- 664 -66 MANUAL 284873 11/03/88 72.60 GOLF PETTY CASH DUES 27- 4204 - 661 -66 MANUAL 284873 11/03/88 34.50 GOLF PETTY CASH CONTRACTED REPAIRS 27- 4248 - 662 -66 MANUAL ti 284B73 11/03/88 17.95 GOLF PETTYCASH LAUNDRY 27 -4262- 663 -66 MANUAL 284873 11/03/88 34.00 GOLF PETTY CASH GENERAL SUPPLYS 27- 4504 - 663 -66 MANUAL 284873 11/03/68 65.00 GOLF PETTY CASH GENERAL SUPPLY$ 27- 4504 - 666 -66 MANUAL • 284B73 11/03/88 11.80 GOLF PETTY CASH OFFICE SUPPLIES 27- 4516 - 661 -66 MANUAL 284873 11/03/88_ _ 111.38 GOLF PETTY CASH COST OF COMMOD 27- 4624- 663 -66 MANUAL 719.36 + • « «« -CKS l • 285844 11/03/88 100.00 EDINA HIST SOCIETY BOOKS 10- 3350 - 000 -00 MANUAL 100.00 • • « « « « «« ««« -CKS 285A84 110,03,"88 c�� °Cr,.� AT6T T€68-P4WNE 10- 4256- SVO -51— MANUAL • es « « « « «« -- - -- - - -- - - ««e -CKS • ESSM09 11/03/88 2,030,335.00 MARQUETTE BANK INVESTMENT 10-1090- 000 -00 MANUAL ✓ 2,030,335.00 • « « « « «« « «« -CKS 28 M98 11/03/88 120.32 MINNEGASCO HEAT 10 -4254- 440 -44 MANUAL 28 M98 11/03/88 102.76 MINNEGASCO HEAT 10- 4254 - 520 -50 MANUAL 28 M98 11/03/88 102.76- MINNEGASCO HEAT 10- 4254-520-50 MANUAL ' 28 M98 11/03/88 102.76 MINNEGASCO HEAT 10- 4254 - 520 -52 MANUAL 28 M98 11/03/88._ __ 174.24 MINNEGASCO _ HEAT 10- 4254 - 540 -54 MANUAL 28 M98 11/03/88 206.96 MINNEGASCO _ HEAT 10- 4254- 646-64 MANUAL ' 28 M98 11/03/88 21182.01 MINNEGASCO HEAT 26- 4254 - 682-68 MANUAL 28 M98 11/03/88 122.76 _ -.- MINNEGASCO HEAT 27- 4254- 662 -66 MANUAL 28 M98 11/04/88 29.17 MINNEGASCO HEAT 27 -4254- 664 -66 MANUAL ' 28 M98 11/04/88 29.17- MINNEGASCO HEAT 27- 4254 - 664 -66 MANUAL 28 M98 11/03/88 __ 29.17 MINNEGASCO _ HEAT 27- 4254 - 664 -66 MANUAL 28 M98 11/03/88 1,305.24 MINNEGASCO HEAT 28 -4254- 702 -70 MANUAL ' 28 M98 11/03/88 113.06 MINNEGASCO HEAT 30 -4254- 782 -78 MANUAL 28 M98 11/03/88 _ --.-66.91 MINNEGASCO HEAT 40- 4254 - 801 -80 MANUAL _ 28 M98 11/03/88 439.79 MINNEGASCO HEAT 40 -4254- 803 -80 MANUAL 28 M98 11/03/88 9.92 MINNEGASCO HEAT 50- 4254 - 821 -82 MANUAL 28 M98_- __11/04/88 _ 13.22- MINNEGASCO _ HEAT 50- 4254 - 841 -84 MANUAL 28 M98 11/04/88 13.22 MINNEGASCO _ _ HEAT _ 50-4254- 841 -84 MANUAL 28 M98 11/03/88 13.22 MINNEGASCO HEAT 50- 4254 - 841 -84 MANUAL 28 M98 - -. 11/03/88 - __- 29.90 __. MINNEGASCO HEAT 50- 4254 - 861 -86 MANUAL 4,916.26 « -- - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - ««« -CKS 285N16 11/03/88 682.09 NSP POWER 10- 1130 - 000 -00 MANUAL J � .J r r r r i i • • •' • • • +1 - 1988 C, JF EDINA __44.51 CHECK R CHECK NO. DATE_ _ AMOUNT VENDOR-- 285N16 11/03/88 31.56 NSP 285N16 11/03/88 92.37 NSP 28SN16 11/03/88 5.95 NSP 285N16 11/03/88 2,770.57 NSP 285N16 _ 11/03/88 33.70 _ _ NSP 285N16 11/03/88 136.47 NSP 285N16 11/03/88 2,126.74 NSP 285N16 11/03/68 S52.48 NSP 285N16 11/03/88 45.10 NSP 285N16 11/03/88 1,887.24 NSP ESSN16 11/03/88 2,454.45 NSP _. 285N16 11/03/88 4,934.79 NSP 285N16 11/03/88 477.11 NSP 285N16 11/03/88 984.99 NSP ESSN16 11/03/88 3,221.37 NSP 285N16 11/03/88 579.52 NSP 285N16 11/03/88 _ 4,203.57 NSP___ _ 285N16 11/03/88 22.91- NSP 285N16 11/03/88 22.91 NSP 28SN16 11/03/88 222.91 NSP 285N16 11/03/88 9,287.35 NSP ESSN16 11/03/88 2,654.70 NSP ESSN16 11/03/88.__ _ 35,974.32 _ NSP__ 285N16 11/03/88 292.70 NSP 26SN16 11/03/88 735.96 NSP 285N16 11/03/88 11228.92 .._ NSP 285N16 11/03/88 552.94 NSP WEST COMM 76,169.89 + 28SU27 11/03/88 __44.51 US WEST COMM 285U27 11/03/88 44.51- US WEST COMM 285027 11/03/88 4.45 US WEST COMM 285U27 11/03/88 7.85 US WES COMM 285U27 11/03/88 3,464.85 US WEST COMM 285U27 '11/03/88 340.44 US WEST COMM 28SU27 11/03/88 _ _._ ._ 101.82 _ US WEST COMM 28SU27 11/03/88 96.88 US WEST COMM 28SU27 11/03/88 142.58 US WEST COMM 28SU27 11/03/88 51.82_ US WEST COMM 28SU27 11/03/88 313.43 US WEST COMM 28SU27 11/03/88 50.92 US WEST COMM 28SU27 11/03/88 __.287.20 _ US WEST COMM 28SU27 11/03/88 46.80 US WEST COMM 28SU27 11/03/88 315.75 US WEST COMM 28SU27 11/03/88 104.37 _US WEST COMM__ 285027 11/03/88 307.80 USWEST COMM 28SU27 11/03/88 147.94 US WEST COMM 28SU27 _ 11/03/88 ___. 176.56_ US WEST COMM 28SU27 11/03/88 124.54 US WEST COMM 6,106.00 + + +++ ++ 286700 25___ __ TOW- DISTRIBUTI fER 10-1130- 000 -00 10 -31 -88 ,E ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. 9 MESSAGE POWER 10- 4252 - 301 -30 MANUAL POWER 10- 4252 - 321 -30 MANUAL POWER 10- 4252 - 322 -30 MANUAL POWER 10- 4252- 330 -30 MANUAL POWER _ 10 -4252- 345 -30 MANUAL POWER 10- 4252- 358 -30 MANUAL POWER 10- 4252 - 375 -30 MANUAL POWER 10-4252- 440 -44 MANUAL POWER 10- 4252 - 460 -46 MANUAL POWER 10- 4252- 520 -52 MANUAL POWER 10 -4252- 540 -54 MANUAL POWER 10- 4252-646 -64 MANUAL POWER 23- 4252 - 612 -61 MANUAL POWER 26- 4252 - 682 -68 MANUAL POWER 27- 4252 - 662 -66 MANUAL POWER 27-4252- 664 -66 MANUAL POWER 28- 4252 - 702 -70 MANUAL POWER 29- 4252 - 722 -72 MANUAL POWER 29 -4252- 722 -72 MANUAL POWER 29- 4252 - 722 -72 MANUAL POWER 30 -4252- 782 -78 MANUAL POWER 40- 4252 - 801 -80 MANUAL POWER _ 40- 4252 - 803 -80 MANUAL POWER 40- 4252 - 804 -80 MANUAL POWER 50- 4252- 821 -82 MANUAL POWER 50- 4252 - 841 -84 MANUAL POWER 50- 4252 - 861 -86 MANUAL TELEPHONE _ 10-1130- 000 -00 TELEPHONE 10- 1130 - 000 -00 TELEPHONE 10-1130- 000 -00 _ 10- 4256-460 -46 ,___TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 10 -4256- 510 -51 TELEPHONE 10 -4256- 622 -62 TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 628 -62 TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 646 -64 TELEPHONE 23- 4256- 612 -61 26 -4256- 682 -68 __TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 27- 4256 - 662 -66 TELEPHONE 27- 4256 - 664 -66 _ TELEPHONE 28- 4256 - 702 -70 TELEPHONE 29 -4256- 722 -72 TELEPHONE 30 -4256- 782 -78 TELEPHONE 404256- 801 -80 TELEPHONE _ 40 -4256- 803 -80 TELEPHONE 50- 4256- 821 -82 TELEPHONE _ 50- 4256- 841 -84 TELEPHONE 50- 4256 - 861 -86 NC CO __... �_ _ _ .__ 50 -4628- 842 -84 _ s 3 + ++ -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL - MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL r++ -CKS MANUAL 1700 \.all Vr cuaviii UnQUM KQWL01G1c IV —j1 -00 rnVG n CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE 286700 11/04/88 204.75 TOW DISTRIBUTING CO 50 -4628- 862 -66 MANUAL 429.40 t tttttt ttt -CKS 286E11 11/04/88 14.56- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 286E11 11/04/88 2.86- EAGLE WINE 50-3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 286E11 11/04/88 39.40- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 286E11 11/04/88 38.87- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 286E11 11/04/88 728.11 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 286E11 11/04/88 142.76 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 286E11 11/04/88 1,970.20 EAGLE WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 286E11 11/04/68 1,943.40 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 286E11 11/03/88 112.11 EAGLE WINE INVENTORY 50- 4632- 842 -84 MANUAL 4,800.89 t tttttt ttt -CKS 286E26 11/04/88 5.76- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 286E26 11/04/88 5.88- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 286E26 11/04/88 24.20- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 286E26 11/04/88 4.46- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 286E26 11/04/88 33.75- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710-842 -84 MANUAL 286E26 11/04/88 17.99- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 286E26 11/04/88 21.21- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842-84 MANUAL 286E26 11/04/88 10.98- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 286E26 11/04/88 3.92- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862-86 MANUAL 286E26 11/04/88 7.59- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 286E26 11/04/88 1,210.38 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626-822 -62 MANUAL 286E26 11/04/88 223.14 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 286E26 11/04/88 1,687.67 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 286E26 11/04/88 379.50 ED PHILLIPS 50-4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 286E26 11/04/88 3.90 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 286E26 11/04/88 576.80 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 286E26 11/04/88 588.93 ED PHILLIPS 50-4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 286E26 11/04/88 2,121.33 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842-84 MANUAL 286E26 11/04/88 1,799.85 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 286E26 11/04/88 392.75 ED PHILLIPS 50-4628-862-86 MANUAL 286E26 11/04/88 1,098.69 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 9,947.20 • tttttt ttt -CKS 286G82 11/04/88 44.27- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL 286G82 11/04/88 34.45- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL 286GS2 11/04/88 113.25- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 286GS2 11/04/88 30.03- GRIGGS COOPER 50-'3700- 862-86 MANUAL 286682 11/04/88 79.89- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710-622 -82 MANUAL 286GS2 11/04/88 137.08- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 286GS2 11/04/88 77.27- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 286682 11/04/88 3,994.35 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 286GS2 11/04/88 6,853.89 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 286682 11/04/88 3,863.28 GRIGGS COOPER 50-4626- 862-86 MANUAL 286GS2 11/04/88 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 286GS2 11/04/88 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 1988 OF EDINA CHECK STER 10 -31 -8, AGE 5 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION _ ACCOUNT NO. INV. w P.O. Y MESSAGE 4„ 286GS2 11/04/68 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 862 -66 MANUAL 286G82 11/04/88 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL it 286P32 11/03/88 14,195.28 • PERA CONTRIBUTION 286P3211/03/88 -�_ 23,347.80- FIDELITY BAN PERA 286P32 11/03/88 23,347.80 PERA CONTRIBUTION r 286J62 11/04/68 23.53- JOHNSON WINE 286J62 11/04/88 .52- JOHNSON WINE 286J62 11/04/88 11.87- JOHNSON WINE 40 286J62 11/04/88 .76- JOHNSON WINE 286J62 11/04/68 65.33- JOHNSON WINE 286J62 11/04/88 46.67- JOHNSON WINE .r. 286J62 11/04/88 1.88- JOHNSON WINE 286J62 11/04/88 2.90- JOHNSON WINE 286J62 11/04/88 25.57- JOHNSON WINE �. 286J62 11/04/88 10.09- JOHNSON WINE 286J62 11/04/88 .35- _ _ JOHNSON WINE 286J62 11/04/88 42.20- JOHNSON WINE v 286J62 11/04/86 16.10 JOHNSON WINE 286J62 11/04/88 3,266.18 JOHNSON WINE 286J62 11/04/88 2,333.84 JOHNSON WINE rr 286J62 11/04/88 9.60 JOHNSON WINE 286J62 11/04/88 _- _ _21110.05 JOHNSON WINE 286J62 11/04/88 8.75 JOHNSON WINE 40 286J62 11/04/88 51.72 JOHNSON WINE 286J62 11/04/88 .70 JOHNSON WINE 286J62 11/04/88 1.05 JOHNSON WINE 4r 286J62 11/04/88 1,185.05 JOHNSON WINE 266J62 11/04/88 76.05 _ JOHNSON WINE 286J62 11/04/86 21.00 JOHNSON WINE 4w 286J62 11/04/86 187.72 JOHNSON WINE 286J62 11/04/88 2,554.09 JOHNSON WINE 286J62 11/04/88 35.70 JOHNSON WINE or 286J62 11/04/88 5.60 JOHNSON WINE 286J62 11/04/88 _ 1.40 _ _ JOHNSON WINE 286J62 11/04/88 289.71 JOHNSON WINE er 286J62 11/04/88 16.80 JOHNSON WINE 286J62 11/04/88 _ - 35.18 JOHNSON WINE 286J62 11/04/88 .00 JOHNSON WINE 4w 286J62 11/04/88 .70 JOHNSON WINE 286J62 -__ _ _ _ 1 1/04/88 _ 1,010.15 _ JOHNSON WINE 12,985.67 286P20 11/04/88 67.92 PAUSTIS 6 SONS 286P20 11/0-4/8-S.- _ __ 1 .50_ _ _ . PAUSTIS_6 _SONS_ 69.42 r •rrrrs - - - - it 286P32 11/03/88 11618.95 PERA CONTRIBUTION 286P3211/03/88 -�_ 23,347.80- FIDELITY BAN PERA 286P32 11/03/88 23,347.80 PERA CONTRIBUTION r 286P32 11/03/88 23,347.80 FIDELITY BANK PERA 50- 3700 - 862 -86 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710- 822-82 50- 3710 - 822 -62 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710- 842 -64 50- 3710-842-84 50- 3710 - 642 -84 50- 3710 - 842 -64 50-3710 - 862 -66 50- 3710 - 662-86 50-3710 - 862-86 50- 4626- 822 -82 50- 4626-622 -62 50- 4626- 842 -84 50-4626- 642 -64 50- 4626- 862 -86 50- 4626 - 862 -86 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628- 822 -82 _ 50- 4628 - 822 -62 50-4628- 822 -82 50-4628- 842 -84 50 -4628- 842-84 50- 4628- 842 -84 50 -4628- 842 -84 50- 4628- 842 -84 50 -4628- 842 -84 . 50- 4628- 862 -86 50- 4628- 862 -86 50- 4628- 862 -86 50- 4628 - 862 -86 _50- 4628 - 862 -86 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50 -4628- 842 -84 _ 10- 4145 - 510 -51 10- 4145 - 510 -51 10- 4145 - 510 -51 10- 4145 - 510 -51 rrr -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL rrr -CKS MANUAL _ MANUAL rrr -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL ]VOU c.lT Ur tUlNA %IncLIn mcw1olmm I - CHECK NO. DATE, __. -.. AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION -.,ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. 0 MESSAGE 24,966.75 * * **-CKS :::P*:: 11/03/88 51000.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 1.0-4290- 510 -51 MANUAL 5,000.00 * « # « « «a 286P82 11/04/88 S.S6- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710-822 -82 286P82 11/04/88 21.07- PRIOR WINE _ _ _.- ._ 50- 3710- 842-84 286P82 11/04/88 9.88- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 286P82 11/04/88 277.99 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 286P82 11/04/88 1,053.42 PRIOR WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 286P82 11/04/88 494.18 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 1,789.08 286016 11/04/88 _. 24.06- QUALITY WINE 50-3710- 822 -82 286016 11/04/88 1.86- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 286016 11/04/88 3.70- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710-822 -82 286016 11/04/88 _ 58.44- QUALITY WINE _ 50- 3710- 842 -84 _ 286016 .- 11/04/88 2.25- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 286Q16 11/04/88 24.24- QUALITY WINE 50-3710 - 842 -84 286016 11/04/88 2.60- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710-842-84 286016 11/04/88 22.54- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 286016 11/04/88 9.90- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 286016 11/04/88 __ - 3.31- QUALITY WINE _ 50- 3710- 862 -86 286Q16 11/04/88 1,202.49 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 822-82 286016 11/04/88 2,920.93 QUALITY WINE 50 -4626- 842 -84 286016 11/04/88 .1,127.07 QUALITY WINE _. 50 -4626- 862 -86 286016 11/04/88 185.70 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 286016 11/04/88 370.00 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 286016 11/04/88 _ 258.75 QUALITY WINE _ _ _. - _ ._. __. 50- 4628- 842 -84 286016 11/04/88 2,420.70 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 286016 11/04/88 224.90 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628-842 -84 286016 ._11/04/88 -- .. 985.50 _ QUALITY WINE _ 50- 4628 - 862 -86 286016 11/04/88 331.00 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 9,874.14 + a #a # «+ 286:05 _ 11/04/88 . _ _... 60.00 _ SALUD AMERICA .- , _ _,- . -_ _ _ - -, -- _ - _. 5.0- 4628 - 862 -86 60.00 + 287A82 11/03/88 11.48 AT &T TELEPHONE 10- 1130 - 000 -00 287A82 89.29 -,_- AT &T _ TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 287A82 11/03/88 8.04 AT &T TELEPHONE 10 -4256- 510 -51 287A82 11/03/88 89.29 AT &T TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 287A82 11/03/88 2.98 _ -- — -. -- AT &T _ -- .__ _ - _ _..._ TELEPHONE - 10-42S6-622-62 287A82 ----- -... 11/03/88 -_ 3.28 AT &T TELEPHONE 23- 4256 - 612 -61 287A82 11/03/88 6.02 AT&T TELEPHONE 26 -4256- 682 -68 * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL *** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL ++ #-CKS MANUAL ** *-CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL 1988 C JF EDINA CHECK R TER 10 -31 -88 vE 7 CHECK NO. DATE - AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. d P.O. N MESSAGE ..• 287A82 11/03/88 38.05 AT&T TELEPHONE 27 -4256- 662 -66 MANUAL 287A82 11/03/88 3.45 AT&T TELEPHONE 28-4256- 702-70 MANUAL 287A82 11/03/88 34.44 AT&T TELEPHONE 30- 4256- 782 -78 MANUAL 287A82 11/03/88 1.93 AT&T TELEPHONE 50- 4256-821 -82 MANUAL 287A82 11/03/88 _ 1.64 AT&T TELEPHONE 50- 4256 - 841 -84 MANUAL 111.31 + 287A83 11/04/88 89.29 AT&T TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 510 -S1 MANUAL 287A83 11/03/88 58.63 AT&T TELEPHONE 23- 4256- 612 -61 MANUAL 147.92 « 287A84 11/03/88 20.85 AT &T TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 287A84 11/04/68 20.85- AT&T TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL v 287A84 11/03/88 20.85 AT&T TELEPHONE 10 -4256- 510 -51 MANUAL 287A84 11/04/88 8.10- AT&T TELEPHONE 50- 4256- 821 -82 MANUAL 287A84 11/03/88 8.10 AT&T TELEPHONE 50- 4256- 821 -82 MANUAL v 287A84 11/03/88 8.10 AT&T TELEPHONE 50 -4256- 821 -82 MANUAL a.io 28.95* « « « « «« ««« -CKS 28SC33 11/03/88 147,000.00- CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 50- 1010-000-00 MANUAL �► 288C33 11/03/88 147,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL .00 + « ««« «« ««« -CKS 287P70 -_P70— 11/03/88 135.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 10- 4290 - 510 -51 MANUAL • 135.00 + « «« « «« ««« -CKS • 291700 11/04/68 39.95 TOW DISTRIBUTING CO 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 291700 11/04/88 199.45 TOW DISTRIBUTING CO 50- 4628-842 -84 MANUAL • 291700 11/04/86 118.25 TOW DISTRIBUTING CO 50-4628 - 862-86 MANUAL 357.65 + • « « « ««« « «« -CKS 291747 11/03/88 450.00 TSS INC CONFERENCES 10- 4202 - 420 -42 MANUAL • 450.00 « 291748 11/03/88 20.00 MACA GENERAL SUPPLYS 10- 4504 - 420 -42 MANUAL 20.00 « 291749 11/04/88 2.07- BRW ENTERPRISES 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL • 291749 11/04/88 138.00 BRW ENTERPRISES 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 135.93 + 291750 11/03/88 742.40 GARVEN GREETINGS INVENTORY 50- 4632 - 822 -82 MANUAL 291750 11/03/88 - -_ -_. 742.40 _. GARVEN GREETINGS INVENTORY 50- 4632 - 842 -84 MANUAL 1,484.80 r . «« « ««« - -- -- - — - - -- - - - - - -- « «« -CKS • 291EII 11/04/88 4.42- EAGLE WINE 50-3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL •tRRFM 291E26 291E26 291E26 291E26 291E26 291E26 291E26 291E26 • 291E26 291E26 291E26 • 291E26 291E26 291E26 291E26 291E26 291E26 291E26 291E26 291E26 291E26 291E26 291E26 291E26 • • u a •t�s�• 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/04/86 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/04/68 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/03/88 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE -WINE 10 -31 -88 PAGE 8 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -4628- 822 -82 1988 CITY OF EDINA MANUAL _ 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL INVENTORY 50 -4632- 862 -86 MANUAL 5.07- CHECK NO. -DATE _. AMOUNT 7.05- 291E11 11/04/88 51.30- 28.04- 291E11 11/04/86 21.87 - 4.56 - _ 291E11 11/04/88 221.12 8.30- 291E11 11/04/88 2,565.19 14.71- 291E11 _ 11/04/88 1,093.62 7.24 - _- 291EII 11/03/88 115.81 1.54- ED PHILLIPS 3,918.15 • •tRRFM 291E26 291E26 291E26 291E26 291E26 291E26 291E26 291E26 • 291E26 291E26 291E26 • 291E26 291E26 291E26 291E26 291E26 291E26 291E26 291E26 291E26 291E26 291E26 291E26 291E26 • • u a •t�s�• 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/04/86 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/04/68 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/04/88 11/03/88 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE -WINE 10 -31 -88 PAGE 8 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL _ 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL INVENTORY 50 -4632- 862 -86 MANUAL _ 1.69- _ ED PHILLIPS _ 50- 3710- 822 -82 1.40- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 822 -82 2.44- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710-822 -62 5.07- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710-822 -82 7.05- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842-84 28.04- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 642 -84 4.56 - _ _ ED PHILLIPS _ _ _ __- _ _ _ _ _ 50-3710 - 842 -84 8.30- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 14.71- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862-86 7.24 - _- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 1.54- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 84.75 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4626- 822-82 122.24 _ _ ED PHILLIPS _ 50- 4626- 822 -82 228.26 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 352.64 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4626- 842 -84 77.32 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626-862 -86 507.02 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 822 -82 140.O6 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 822 -82 _2,804.50 ED PHILLIPS _ _ - 50 -4628- 842 -84 830.87 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 1,471.80 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 24.95- ED PHILLIPS 50-4628- 862 -86 724.19 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 662 -86 68.75 ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY 50-4630 - 862 -86 7,305.63 + 8,525.39 + 291G82 11/04/88 69.53- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700- 822 -82 291G82 11/04/88 21.33- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700- 822 -82 291G82 11/04/88 71.49- GRIGGS COOPER _- _ _ 50- 3700 - 842 -84 291G82 11/04/88 56.89- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 842 -84 291GSE 11/04/88 46.55- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 291G82 11/04/88 _ 99.69- __ —__- GRIGGS COOPER _ _ 50- 3710 - 842 -84 291G82 11/04/88 33.74- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 291G82 11/04/88 2,327.37 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 822 -82 291682 11/04/88, 4,984.41 GRIGGS COOPER 50'4626-842 -84 291G82 11/04/88 1,686.97 GRIGGS COOPER 50 -4626- 862 -86 291582 11/04/88 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628- 822 -82 291 G82 11/04/88 _ _ . .00 _- _ _ GRIGGS COOPER _ _. _ _ _ 50- 4628- 822 -82 291682 11/04/88 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628- 842 -84 291682 11/04/86 33.82- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628- 842 -84 291 G82 11/04/88 _ 40.32---- ____GRIGGS COOPER _ -, _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 50- 4628-842 -84 291G82 _ 11/04/88 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628- 842 -84 8,525.39 + s•« -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL + *+ -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL • • • J ZIA (988 C OF EDINA CHECK 1 .TER 10 -31 -88 GE 9 y CHECK NO._ DATE - - AMOUNT_ -_ _ _ -_ _ _ _ VENDOR_ ITEM DESCRIPTION - ACCOUNT NO.-INV. N P.O. 9 MESSAGE t••sr+ •++ -CKS .. 291J62 11/04/88 246.25- JOHNSON WINE 50-3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL 291J62 _ 11/04/88 _ _ 657.02- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL 291J62 11/04/88 1,166.69- JOHNSON WINE 50-3700- 862 -86 MANUAL ., 291J62 11/04/88 10.46- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 291J62 11/04/88 .76- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 291J62 11/04/88 82.88- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 291J62 11/04/88 155.29- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 291J62 11/04/88 18.19- - JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 291J62 11/04/88 15.97- JOHNSON WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL �.,. 291J62 11/04/88 70.47- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 291J62 11/04/88 4,143.59 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 291J62 11/04/88 19.95 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL �. 291J62 11/04/88 7,763.84 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 291J62 11/04/88 _ 37.80 _ JOHNSON WINE _ _ _ - -. 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 291J62 11/04/88 3,'523.55 JOHNSON WINE _ 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL �. 291J62 11/04/88 15.05 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4626- 862-86 MANUAL 291J62 11/04/88 76.05 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 291J62 11/04/88 1,045.35 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL rr 291J62 11/04/88 1.05 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 291J62 11/04/88_- _ .00 JOHNSON WINE _ 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 291J62 11/04/88 9.80 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 291J62 11/04/88 .00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 291J62 11/04/88 1,818.05 _ JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 291J62 11/04/88 19.60 JOHNSON WINE 50-4628- 842 -84 MANUAL .� 291J62 11/04/68 1,597.48 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 291J62 _11/04/88 .00 _ JOHNSON WINE 50-4628-862 -86 MANUAL 291J62 11/04/88 24.85 JOHNSON WINE _ 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL .. 17,672.03 • •s +++• • ++ -CKS r 291M09 11/03/88 410,486.20 _ MARQUETTE BANK -_ __INVESTMENT 10- 1090 - 000-00 MANUAL 410,486.20 r ++ + + ++ ++• -CKS r 291P70 11/03/88 465.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 10 -4290- 510 -51 MANUAL 465.00 • + ++ -CKS 291P82 11/04/88 9.04- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 291P82 11/04/88 10.37- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 291P82___ 1.1_/04/88__ ____452.10____ _ PRIOR_WINE __ _- 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 291P82 11/04/88 518.40 PRIOR WINE 50-4628- 862 -86 _ MANUAL • 951.09 • + +•+ ++ +++ -CKS 291016 11/04/88 43.46- QUALITY WINE _ 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 291016 11/04/88 3.40- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL r 291016 11/04/88 37.36- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL j 1988 CITY OF EDINA COMM REVENUE CHECK REGISTER TAX 10-3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 292C51 11/03/88 244.21 COMM CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR MANUAL 291016 11/04/88 12.03- QUALITY WINE SALES 291016 11/04/8@ _... 49.83- _. QUALITY WINE 7,885.60 291016 11/04/88 2.38- QUALITY WINE MANUAL 291016 11/04/88 7.44- QUALITY WINE SALES 291016 - -- 11/04/88 - ------ - - -_2, 172 .97 - -- -- QUALITY _WINE . - - - -- 174.61 291016 11/04/88 1,868.67 QUALITY WINE MANUAL 291016 11/04/88 2,492.03 QUALITY WINE SALES 291016 - -.- .. 11/04/88 __ -___ _.- .. 340.20.._. .......__ QUALITY WINE 2,320.00 291016 11/04/88 1,200.60 QUALITY WINE MANUAL 291016 11/04/88 236.75 QUALITY WINE SALES 29101.b... ... - 50-3357- 001 -00 MANUAL 292C51 14,197.01 COMM REVENUE. 8,894.92 • TAX 50 -3357- 002 -00 10 -31 -88 PAGE 10 i ITEM DESCRIPTION_ ---.--..----ACCOUNT NO. INV.- R P.O. N MESSAGE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50-4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822-82 MANUAL 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL rrrrrr rrr -CKS 292051 11/03/88 114.48 COMM REVENUE SALES TAX 10-3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 292C51 11/03/88 244.21 COMM REVENUE SALES TAX 23- 3357 - 000-00 MANUAL 292C51 11/03/88 6.87 COMM REVENUE SALES TAX 26 -3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 29X51 11/03/88 7,885.60 COMM REVENUE SALES TAX 27- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 292C51_ .- __...__ 11 /03/88. _ _. ._363.31 COMM REVENUE .. -_- _- SALES TAX 28-3357- 000 -00 - MANUAL 29X51 11/03/88 174.61 COMM REVENUE SALES TAX 29 -3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 292051 11/03/88 173.00 COMM REVENUE SALES TAX 30- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 292C51 11/03/88 2,320.00 COMM REVENUE SALES TAX 40- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 292051 11/03/88 6,956.79 COMM REVENUE SALES TAX 50-3357- 001 -00 MANUAL 292C51 11/03/88 14,197.01 COMM REVENUE. SALES TAX 50 -3357- 002 -00 MANUAL 292051_ -__.. _____..11/.03/88_ ______.___ ...1.3,000.- 84.COMM REVENU .._.____.SALES TAX _.. -.50- 3357-003 -00 __- MANUAL - 292051 11/03/88 1,300.84 COMM REVENUE SALES TAX 50- 3357 - 003 -00 MANUAL 292C51 11/03/88 1,300.84- COMM REVENUE SALES TAX 50- 3357 - 003 -00 MANUAL 45,436.7E • •rrrr• rrr -CKS - 292F14 _ ...... - - -- -- 11/03/88 - - - -- 13,332.69 - - -- - -- FIDELITY BANK -- - --- FICA ------ 10- 4149- 510-51 MANUAL 292F14 11/03/88 429.89 FIDELITY BANK CONTRIBUTION 10 -4162- 510 -51 MANUAL - - -- rrrrrr rrr -CKS 293751 11/03/88 355.00 NATL LEAGUE CITYS CONFERENCES 10 -4202- 100 -10 MANUAL 355.00 + rrrrrr rrr -CKS 295T64_.._______t_1- /0.3/88 _ ________ -__ —_ 240. 50_._ __- ______.SANDY. ANDERSON______- MEET.I,NG- EXPENSE$-- - __-- .___ -10- 06 - 500 - MANUAL 50._ 240.50 + - 42- -- -- - -- , rsrrrr rrr -CKS 299700 11/04/88 333.55 TOW DISTRIBUTING CO 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL e - -__- __TOW ._- DI8TRIBUT.ING_.._C0 _ - -___- _- - -._ -- ..._ ..._ _ -- ;---- .-- -_ -50- 4.628, - 862 - -86.. _ _ _ __- MANUAL 389.40 + c rrrrrr rrr -CKS 299749 11/04/88 1.18- BRW ENTERPRISES 50- 3710 - 842 -84' MANUAL 1988 OF EDINA CHECK CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR 299749 11/04/88 78.60 BRW ENTERPRISES 77.42 • ,STER 10 -31 -8. AGE it ITEM DESCRIPTION _ ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. N MESSAGE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL r ••• -CKS MANUAL ••* -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL ••• -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL ••• -CKS 0 e 0 0 0 e 0 0 0 v 0 e e 299784 11/03/88 42.00 AMM MEETING EXPENSES 10 -4206- 100 -10 r. 42.00 • 1%04%88 EAGLE 50-4632-862-86 299E11 52.80- 50 299E11 11/04/88 9.15- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 v. 299E11 11/04/88 25.95- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 299E11 11/04/88 2,639.82 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 299E11 11/04/88 457.43 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 v., 299Et1 11/04/88 1,297.70 EAGLE WINE 50- 4626 - 662 -86 299E11 11/03/88 _ 41.08 EAGLE WINE INVENTORY _ 50- 4632- 822 -82 299E11' 11/03/88 59.32 EAGLE WINE INVENTORY 50- 4632- 842 -84 v 4,407.45 4,404.18* 299E26 11/04/88 3.90- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3700- 862 -86 299E26 11/04/88 5.34- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 622 -82 • 299E26 11/04/88 9.90- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 822 -82 299E26 11/04/88 _ 4.27 - _ ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 622 -82 299E26 11/04/88 1.44- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 822 -82 • 299E26 11/04/88 5.87- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842-84 299E26 11/04/88 1.20- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 842 -84 299E26 11/04/88 23.20- ED PHILLIPS 50-3710- 842 -84 • 299E26 11/04/88 8.77- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 842 -64 299E26 _. 11/04/88 _ 8.96- ED PHILLIPS _- _ _ - 50- 3710 - 662 -86 299E26 11/04/88 4.71- ED PHILLIPS 50-3710- 862 -86 r 299E26 11/04/88 10.05- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 862 -86 299E26 11/04/88 _ 32.63- _ _ _ ED PHILLIPS - - - 50- 3710 - 862-86 299E26 11/04/86 .64- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 299E26 11/04/88 213.57 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 822 -82 299E26 11/04/88 72.42 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 822 -82 299E26 11/04/88 293.99 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 r 299E26 11/04/88 1,631.64 ED PHILLIPS 50-4626 - 862 -86 299E26 -- 11/04/88 - - -- 235.57 - -- ED PHILLIPS - 50- 4626- 862 -86 299E26 - 11/04/88 990.71 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 r 299E26 11/04/88 534.85 ED PHILLIPS SO- 4628- 822 -82 299E26 11/04/88 .2,320.88 -- ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 299E26 11/04/88 22.90- ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628-642 -84 • 299E26 11/04/88 120.24 ED PHILLIPS 50-4628- 842 -84 299E26 11/04/88 677.90ED PHILLIPS _ - 504628-842 -84 _ 299E26 11/04/88 896.22 ED PHILLIPS 50-4628-862-86 • 299E26 11/04/88 11005.89 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 299E26 11/04/88 ___ .00 _ ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 299E26 11/04/88 64.98 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 r 299E26 11/03/88 105.50 ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY 50- 4630- 842 -84 299E26 11/03/88 29.70 ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY 50 -4632- 842 -84 - -- 9,250.28 • r ••• -CKS MANUAL ••* -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL ••• -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL ••• -CKS 0 e 0 0 0 e 0 0 0 v 0 e e 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT CHECK REGISTER 10 -31 -88 PAGE 12 VENDOR . ITEM DESCRIPTION_- _ .__,_ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. 6 MESSAGE 299G82 11/04/88 50.45- GRIGGS COOPER 299682 11/04/88 34.51- GRIGGS COOPER 299G82 11/04/88 47.54- GRIGGS COOPER 299G82 11/04/88 _ _ -_ 138.43- - GRIGGS COOPER 299G82 11/04/88 2,377.00 GRIGGS COOPER 299G82 11/04/88 61921.39 GRIGGS COOPER 299G82 11/04/88 52.43- GRIGGS COOPER 299G82 11/04/88 4.31- GRIGGS COOPER y 299G82 11/04/88 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 299G82_ -_ _ 11/04/88 .00 _ GRIGGS COOPER 11/04/88 1.00- 8,970.72 + WINE 6 11/04/68 20.16- JOHNSON WINE _ rwws•r a 50 -3700- 862 -86 50- 3700 - 662 -66 50- 3710- 842 -84 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 4626- 842 -84 50- 4626 - 862 -86 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50- 4628- 862 -86 50 -4628- 862 -86 _ 50_ -4628- 862 -86 50- 3700 - 822 -82 50- 3700 - 822 -82 50-3700 - 622 -82 50- 3700 - 642-84 50- 3700 - 842 -84 50- 3700 - 642 -84 50- 3700- 842 -84 50- 3700 - 862 -86 - - - - - - 50- 3700 - 862 -86 50-3700 - 862 -86 _ -- 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50-3710- 822 -82 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50 -3710- 842 -84 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 3710- 862 -86 50- 4626- 822 -82 50-4626- 822 -82 50- 4626 - 842 -84 -- _ - -- _ - -- _ -- 50- 4626-842 -84 50- 4626 - 862 -86 50- 4626- 862 -86 50- 4628- 822 -82 - - 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50 -4628- 822 -82 _ 50- 4628- 822 -82 50 -4628- 822 -82 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628- 842 -84 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628- 842 -84 50- 4628-842 -84 50- 4628-842 -84 50- 4628- 862 -86 50-4628-862 -86 50-4628-862 -86 50- 4628 - 862 -86 -- - - -. -- --------- - - - -50 -4628 -862 -86 MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL • +• -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL + ++ -CKS v J • • C 299J62 11/04/88 39.44- JOHNSON WINE 299J62 11/04/88______ - -_ 93.21- _ JOHNSON WINE 299J62 11/04/88 3.00- JOHNSON WINE 299J62 11/04/88 8.00- JOHNSON WINE 299J62 11/04/88 98.06- JOHNSON WINE 299J62 11/04/88 3.00- JOHNSON WINE 299J62 11/04/88 2.97- JOHNSON WINE 299J62 11/04/88 1.00- _ JOHNSON WINE 299J62 11/04/68 20.16- JOHNSON WINE 299J62 11/04/88 40.77- JOHNSON WINE 299J62 11/04/68 7.34- _ JOHNSON WINE 299J62 11/04/88 46.55- JOHNSON WINE 299J62 11/04/88 14.28- JOHNSON WINE 299162 11/04/88 76.61- WINE 299J62 11/04/88 9.82- JOHNSON WINE 299J62 11/04/88 47.60- JOHNSON WINE 299J62 11/04/88 2,327.48 JOHNSON WINE 299J62 11/04/88 7.35 JOHNSON WINE 299J62 11/04/88 3,829.85 JOHNSON WINE 299J62 _- _ _ 11/04/88 _ ._ 16.10 JOHNSON WINE 299J62 11/04/88 2,380.13 JOHNSON WINE 299J62 11/04/88 11.90 JOHNSON WINE 299J62 - 11/04/88 _ .00 - _ _ JOHNSON WINE 299J62 11/04/88 .00 JOHNSON WINE 299J62 11/04/88 .00 JOHNSON WINE 299J62 11/04/88 735.37 JOHNSON WINE 299J62 11/04/88 8.05 JOHNSON WINE 299J62 11/04/88 .00 JOHNSON WINE 299J62 11/04/88 _ 1,428.02 JOHNSON WINE 299J62 11/04%88 .00 JOHNSON WINE 299J62 11/04/88 .00 JOHNSON WINE 299J62 11/04/88 23.45___ _JOHNSON WINE__ -__ 299J62 11/04/88 .00 JOHNSON WINE 299J62 11/04/88 .00 JOHNSON WINE 299J62 _ 11/04/88 _ - _._ _. -16. 10 .__ ._ - JOHNSON WINE 299J62 11/04/88 .00 JOHNSON WINE 299162 11/04/88 .00 JOHNSON WINE _ 299J62 981.81 _ ____JOHNSON WINE_ 11,253.80 + _ rwws•r a 50 -3700- 862 -86 50- 3700 - 662 -66 50- 3710- 842 -84 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 4626- 842 -84 50- 4626 - 862 -86 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50- 4628- 862 -86 50 -4628- 862 -86 _ 50_ -4628- 862 -86 50- 3700 - 822 -82 50- 3700 - 822 -82 50-3700 - 622 -82 50- 3700 - 642-84 50- 3700 - 842 -84 50- 3700 - 642 -84 50- 3700- 842 -84 50- 3700 - 862 -86 - - - - - - 50- 3700 - 862 -86 50-3700 - 862 -86 _ -- 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50-3710- 822 -82 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50 -3710- 842 -84 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 3710- 862 -86 50- 4626- 822 -82 50-4626- 822 -82 50- 4626 - 842 -84 -- _ - -- _ - -- _ -- 50- 4626-842 -84 50- 4626 - 862 -86 50- 4626- 862 -86 50- 4628- 822 -82 - - 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50 -4628- 822 -82 _ 50- 4628- 822 -82 50 -4628- 822 -82 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628- 842 -84 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628- 842 -84 50- 4628-842 -84 50- 4628-842 -84 50- 4628- 862 -86 50-4628-862 -86 50-4628-862 -86 50- 4628 - 862 -86 -- - - -. -- --------- - - - -50 -4628 -862 -86 MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL • +• -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL + ++ -CKS v J • • C d 1988 C JF EDINA CHECK F TER 10 -31 -88 E 13 CHECK NO. DATE_, ______ _._ _- AMOUNT _ ____VENDOR _ _ _ITEM DESCRIPTION .- _ -. ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. • MESSAGE 299P20 11/04/88 170.86 PAUSTIS 6 SONS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 299P20 11/04/88 5.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 299P20 11/04/88 66.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 299P20 25.00 PAUSTIS & SONS INVENTORY - - - 50- 4632 - 822 -82 MANUAL 266.86 • +•• ++• +++ -CKS 299PS2 11/04/88 .50- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 299PS2 11/04/88 _ 5.68- PRIOR WINE _ _ 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 299PS2 11/04/88 24.99 PRIOR WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 299PS2 11/04/88 283.99 PRIOR WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 302.80 • +++++• +•• -CKS 299016 11/04/88 3.13- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 299016 11/04/88 33.93- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 299016 11/04/88 7.46- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 299016 11/04/88 16.09- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 299016 11/04/88 66.60- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 299016 _ _ 11/04/88 _ 8.31- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 299016 11/04/88 1.41 QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 299016 11/04/88 2.25- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 299016 11/04/88 _ 68.76- QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 299016 11/04/88 10.60- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 1 299016 11/04/88 11695.91 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 299016 11/04/88 3,329.41 QUALITY WINE _ 50-4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 299016 11/04/88 3,437.92 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626-862 -86 MANUAL �r 299916 11/04/68 311.50 QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 299016 11/04/88 _ 744.65 QUALITY WINE 50-4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 299016 11/04/88 829.00 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 299016 11/04/88 1,608.40 QUALITY WINE 50-4628-842-84 MANUAL 299016 11/04/88 224.15 QUALITY WINE _ 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 299016 11/04/88 70.71- QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL r 299016 11/04/88 1,056.75 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL r'. •+•••r ••• -CKS 300A82 11/03/88 8.94 AT &T TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL r 30OA82- 11/03/88 53.13 AT &T TELEPHONE 27- 4256 - 662 -66 MANUAL 300A82 11/03/88 _ 5.41 AT &T TELEPHONE _- _ _ .27- 4256- 664 -66 MANUAL 300A82 11/03/88 1.62 AT &T TELEPHONE 28- 4256 - 702 -70 MANUAL 69.10 • • +r• ++ +••- KS (2 checks) 301P32 11/03/88 _ 146.33 PERA CONTRIBUTION 10- 4145 - 510 -51 MANUAL 301P32 11/03/88 26,552.34 PERA PERA 10- 4145 - 510-51 MANUAL r 26,698.67 + ++••+r •++- KS v � _ _ 301 P70_ _ _ 1 1 /03/88 ______ _250 , OQ _ POSTMASTER _ POSTAGE _ . - __ _ _ __ __ _ 10-4290-51 0-Sl MANUAL J 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -31 -88 PAGE 14 _ J l CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. w MESSAGE 250.00 + + * *srss * +* —CKS r 302C33 _ 11/03/88 187,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER _- .. 50= 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 302C33 11/03/88 187,000.00- CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 50- 1010-000 -00 MANUAL .00 + • »r * * *» * *+—CKS • 302G86 11/03/88 - 7,742.61 GROUP HEALTH INC CONTRIBUTION - - 10- 4156 - 510 -51 MANUAL 7,742.61 + � r *r* » »* * ** -CKS �= 302P42 11/03/88 13,347.03 PHY HEALTH PLAN CONTRIBUTION 10 -4156- 510 -51 MANUAL 13,347.03 * * ** -CKS • 305C47 11/03/88 414.00 COMM LIFE INS CO PREMIUM 10- 4157 - 510 -51 MANUAL 414.00 + ** *—CKS 305F14 11/03/88 __12,746.55 FIDELITY BANK FICA _ 10 -4149- 510 -51 MANUAL 305F14 11/03/88 376.77 FIDELITY BANK MEDICARE 10- 4162-510 -51 MANUAL 13,123.32 + » »r » »r * ** —CKS 305M24 11/03/88 10,054.40 MED CENTER CONTRIBUTION. -.___ 10 -4156- 510 -51 MANUAL 10,054.40 ** *sr* * ** —CKS �. 305M98 11/03/88 332.27 MINNEGASCO HEAT 10 -4254- 440 -44 MANUAL 305M98 11/03/88. 307.43 MINNEGASCO HEAT _ 10- 4254 - 520 -52 MANUAL 305M98 11/03/88 1,731.63 MINNEGASCO HEAT 10- 4254 - 540 -54 MANUAL z 305M98 11/03/88 358.21 MINNEGASCO HEAT 10- 4254 - 646 -64 MANUAL 305M98 ____11/03/88 _ _ ______ 31.89 _ MINNEGASCO _ _ _ _ HEAT _ 23-4254- 612 -61 MANUAL 305M98 11/03/88 309.31 MINNEGASCO HEAT 27-4254-662 -66 MANUAL 305M98 11/03/88 32.41 MINNEGASCO HEAT 27- 4254 - 664 -66 MANUAL 305M98 - 11/03/88 - .__ 1,617.80 MINNEGASCO HEAT _ _- - -___- 28- 4254 - 702 -70 MANUAL 305M98 11/03/88 1,106.62 MINNEGASCO HEAT 30- 4254 - 782 -78 MANUAL 305M98 11/03/88 83.74 MINNEGASCO HEAT 40-4254- 801 -80 MANUAL f� 305M98 __ 1 1 /03/88 i , 208.44 1,208.44 MINNEGASCO _ HEAT _ _ 40A4254- 803 -80 MANUAL 305M98 11/03/88 63.73 MINNEGASCO HEAT 50 -4254- 841 -84 MANUAL 305M98 11/03/88 10.67 MINNEGASCO HEAT 50- 4254 - 661 -86 MANUAL 4' - - - -- -- - - - -- 7._1.94.1.5 +! srssss sss -CKS 305N12 11/03/88 2,578.10 MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE PREMIUM 10- 4158 - 510-51 MANUAL 2,578.10 + d 4$ • ••1988 OF EDINA CHECK ISTER 10 -31 -6 AGE 15 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT _ VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE r* **r* r *r -CKS 305P32 11/03/88 22,778.51 PERA CONTRIBUTION 10- 4145- 510 -51 MANUAL - - - - - - - - 22, 778.51 - �. * **r** * ** -CKS 306700 11/04/88 66.25 TOW DISTRIBUTING CO 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 66.25 + *** -CKS 306EII 11/04/88 29.22- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 306E11 11/04/88 38.71- EAGLE WINE SO -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 306E11 11/04/88 60.66- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 306E11 ------ 11/04/88 1,460.99 _ EAGLE WINE _ 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 306E11 11/04/88 1,935.52 EAGLE WINE 50-4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL �. 306E11 11/04/88 3,032.75 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 306E11 .11/03/88 23.11 _ EAGLE WINE INVENTORY 50 -4632- 842 -84 MANUAL 306E11 11/03/88 141.33 EAGLE WINE INVENTORY 50-4632- 862 -86 MANUAL 6,465.11 r* * * ** * ** -CKS 306E26 11/04/88 -_ 3.14- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 306E26 11/04/88 4.23- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 306E26 11/04/88 2.86- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 306E26 11/04/88_ 3.12- ED PHILLIPS _ _ 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 306E26 11/04/88 15.56- ED PHILLIPS SO- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 306E26 11/04/88 5.26- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 306E26 11/04/88 _ 9.53 -_ -_ ED PHILLIPS SO -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 306E26 11/04/88 12.07- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL �. 306E26 11/04/88 3.12- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 306E26 11/04/88 1.31- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 306E26 11/04/88 17.80- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL o. 306E26 11/04/88 5.13- ED PHILLIPS SO- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 306E26 11/04/88 _ -.- _ 157.33 _ ED PHILLIPS _ - 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 306E26 11/04/88 263.47 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL +..' 306E26 11/04/88 603.95 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 306E26 11/04/88 65.74 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 306E26_ 11/04/88 286.40 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL �. 306E26 11/04/88 423.95 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 306E26 - -- 11/04/88 _ _ 312.50 _ ED PHILLIPS _ -_ _ - 50-4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 306E26 11/04/88 1,556.67 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 642 -84 MANUAL 306E26 11/04/88 953.70 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 306E26 11/04/88 --- 1 ,780.42 ED PHILLIPS 504628- 862 -86 MANUAL 306E26 11/04/88 513.25 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 306E26 11/04/88 312.50 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL -- - _ ._7,146.75-*, rrrrrr *+* -CKS 306G82 11/04/86 50.89- GRIGGS COOPER 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL " 306G82 11/04/88 24.69- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL I I tv ttv 1✓ 1988 CITY OF EDINA 11/04/88 9.50- CHECK REGISTER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 10-31 -88 PACE 16 CHECK NO. DATE _ _._ - __.AMOUNT _ - VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION.------ ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE 306682 11/04/88 52.78- GRIGGS COOPER 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 306G82 11/04/88 16.74- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL y 306G82 11/04/88 2,544.72 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 306682 11/04/88 1,234.55 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 306G82 ___ 11/04/88 2,639.13 - GRIGGS COOPER _ 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 306082 11/04/88 837.10 GRIGGS _ _ _ _ COOPER 50 -4626- 842 -84 MAN UAL 7,110.40 + + ++ -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL ,a MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL + ++ -CKS MANUAL „. MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL , MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL + ++ -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL �4 306J62 11/04/88 9.50- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 306J62 11/04/88 6.53- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 306J62 11/04/88 21.10- --e4-4= JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 306J62 11/04/88 147.83- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 306J62 11/04/88 12.95- JOHNSON WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 t` 306J62 11/04/88 61.97- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 306J62 11/04/88 474.81 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 306J62 11/04/88 2.10 _ JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 306J62 11/04/88 7,390.67 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4626- 842 -84 306J62 11/04/66 35.00_ - -_ JOHNSON WINE 50 -4626- 842 -84 306J62 11/04/88 8.40 JOHNSON WINE _ 50-4626 - 862 -66 306J62 11/04/88 3,099.16 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 306J62 11/04/88 73.65- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 306J62 11/04/88 653.71 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 306J62 11/04/88 9.45 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 306J62 11/04/88 7.58- - - _JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 306J62 11/04/88 33.95 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 to 306J62 11/04/88 2.53- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 306J62 11/04/88 __— _2,107.36 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 306J62 11/04/88 15.05 JOHNSON WINE 50-4626- 862 -86 306J62 11/04/88 4.69 - JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 306J62 11/04/88 _ 1,294.41. JOHNSON- WINE- _ - 50- 4628 - 862 -66 �r +7 -nom 14,775.76* 1g: 306P82 11/04/88 9.64- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 622 -82 306P62 11/04/88 _ 8.48- _ - -- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 642 -84 306P82 11/04/88 5.15- PRIOR WINE _ 50- 3710 - 862 -86 cw 306P82 11/04/88 463.51 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 306P82 11/03/88 18.59 _ PRIOR WINE INVENTORY 50 -4628- 822 -82 306P82 11/04/88 423.69 _ _ _ _ PRIOR WINE ____ 50-4626-842 -84 306P82 11/04/88 257.67 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 306P82 11/03/88 . _ 65.17 _ PRIOR WINE _INVENTORY 4632 - 822 -82 1,205.56 +. _ --- .-- - -.50- _ + + +•ss 306016 11/04/88 18.45- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 306Q16_ 11/04/88 - 1.15 - QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 306016 11/04/88 6.53- QUALITY WINE - -- - -- -- - 50 -3710- 822 -82 to 306016 11/04/88 16.08- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 306Q16 _11/04/88 2.16 - — - __QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 306016 11/04/88 46.47- QUALITY WINE - - - - - - -- - — -- 50- 3710 - 842 -84 IR 306Q16 11/04/88 22.72- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 + ++ -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL ,a MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL + ++ -CKS MANUAL „. MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL , MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL + ++ -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL �4 1988 G OF 'EDINA CHECK 3TER 10 -31 -86 GE 17 CHECK._NO._DATE -_.__ _ AMOUNT_ VENDOR - -ITEM DESCRIPTION _ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P.O. .9 MESSAGE 306016 11/04/88 2.47- QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 306016 11/04/88 2.98- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 306016 11/04/88 1.32- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 306016 11/04/88 10.40- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 306016 11/04/88 _ _- __- 58.11- _ QUALITY WINE _ _ 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 306016 11/04/86 804.41 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626-822 -82 MANUAL ._ 306016 11/04/88 2,322.69 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 306016 11/04/88 2,905.45 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 306016 11/04/88 651.25 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 622 -82 MANUAL 306016 11/04/88 1,845.60 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 306Q16 - 11/04/88 115.00 QUALITY WINE _ 50-4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 306016 11/04/88 2,267.30 QUALITY WINE 50-4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 306016 11/04/88 246.25 QUALITY WINE 50-4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 306016 11/04/88 215.00 QUALITY WINE 50-4628- 842 -64 MANUAL 306016 11/04/88 297.40 QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL �. 306016 11/04/88 1,037.25 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 306016 - 11/04/88 _ 131.25 -_ _ QUALITY WINE _ 50_- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 12,650.01 ,. •��sw• - - -- - - «s« -CKS ,. 306805 11/04/88 142.00 SALUD AMERICA 50- 4628- 842-84 MANUAL — -- — - - - -- 142. 00 — _ •s +��• Rts -CKS 12,072,714.80 10 TOTAL - GENERAL FUND 957.70 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER 3,231.71 FUND 26 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUND 13,360.44 _ FUND 27 TOTAL _ _ _ GOLF COURSE FUND 7,782.19 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND ,. 444.32 FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND • 11,030.22 _ FUND 30 TOTAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 43,452.77 FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND 238,372.45 238,375 73— FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 12,391,346.60 l $7391- TOTAL ,349.88