Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-01-09_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 9, 1989 7:00 P.M. OATHS OF OFFICE - Mayor and Council Members ROLLCALL APPOINTMENT - City Council Member RESOLUTION - "Year of the Young Reader" I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. All agenda items listed with an asterisk ( *) are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Council Member or, citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. * II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of September 19, 1988 III. PUBLIC HEARING - DESIGNATION OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND APPROVAL OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required -to pass..... rival Develoyiiient -- Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. * A. Lot Division - 6616 Kenney Place /5109 West 66th Street .__ Lang and Baumgartner V. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS VI. AWARD OF BIDS * A. Annual Service Contract - Emergency Communications System VII. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Recycling Commission Report B. Park and Recreation Plan C. Council Meetings Schedule D. Conference for Newly Elected Officials - January 28, 1989 E. Annual Congressional City Conference (NLC) - March 11 -14, Washington D.C. F. Appointment of H.R.A. Commissioners G. Council Member Assignments 1. Southwest Suburban Cable Commission 2. South Hennepin Human Services Council 3. I -494 Transportation Committee a) Project Management Team b) JPA 4. Municipal Legislative Commission H. Board and Commission Appointment Procedures I. Futures Commission - Mayor Richards VIII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES - Mayor Richards Agenda Edina City Council Page Two January 9, 1989 IX X. XI. xII. RESOLUTIONS. Favorable rollcall vote by majority of quorum to pass. A. Official Depositories Designation B. Signatory Resolution C. Facsimile Signatures D. Assignment of Securities in Lieu of Bond 1. First Bank Edina 2. Marquette Bank Minneapolis E. Tax Forfeited Land Parcel SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS FINANCE A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 1/9/89: General Fund $72,869.40, Art Center $3,432.72, Capital Fund $305.32, Golf Course Fund $15,510.15, _.- `Recreation Center Fund $263.19, Gun Range Fund $371.88, Edinborough-Park $4,123.31, Utility Fund $224,769.98, Storm Sever Utility $1,492.40, Liquor Dispensary Fund $545.96, Total $323,684.31 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Mon Jan 16 MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY Mon Jan 23 Regular Council Meeting Thurs Feb 2 MLC Dinner Meeting Mon Feb 20 PRESIDENTS DAY Mon -Feb 27 Regular Council - Meeting CITY HALL CLOSED 7:00 p.m. Council Room 6:00 p.m. Decathalon CITY HALL CLOSED 7:00 p.m. Council Room MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 19, 1988 Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner and Mayor Courtney. AAA PEDESTRIAN SAFETY RECORD AWARD PRESENTED TO CITY. JoAnne Boche, Community Services Manager, Automobile Club of Minneapolis, presented a special citation for Outstanding Pedestrian Accident Record to the City of Edina. She stated that Edina's record has been zero pedestrian deaths during 1987. The award gives recognition to the community of Edina for outstanding pedestrian safety program activities which include the evaluation of the accident record system, specific pedestrian control legislation, enforcement of pedestrian and driver behavior, traffic engineering service for pedestrians, community traffic safety coordination and school traffic safety and public information and education. Mayor Courtney and Chief Swanson received.the plaque on behalf of the City. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED. Motion vas made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Turner to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARINGS CONDUCTED ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Due notice having been given, public hearings were conducted and action taken as hereinafter recorded.on the following proposed assessments. 1. MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. M -88 Location: 50th Street and France Avenue Business District Engineer Fran Hoffman presented analysis of assessment showing total cost of $42,156.84 proposed to be assessed against 295,030 assessable square feet at $0.14289 per square foot. One year assessment to be paid in 1989. He advised that staff had met with nine 50th /France business owners and had talked to them about the parking ramp maintenance fees that may be assessed in the future. Engineer Hoffman recommended that the current assessment be continued to October 3, 1988, so that notices can be sent to all businesses at 50th /France. Motion was made by Member Turner, seconded by Member Richards, and carried unanimously to continue the public hearing on Maintenance Improvement No. M -88 to the Council Meeting of October 3, 1988. 2. TREE REMOVAL PROJECT NO. TR -88 Location: Various locations of diseased trees within the City of Edina. Engineer Hoffman presented analysis of assessment showing total cost of $2,413.50 proposed to be assessed against 10 assessable lots allocated individually per size of tree removed. Assessments to be spread over one year and five years depending on amount of assessment. No objections were heard and none had been received prior hereto. Assessment approved by motion of Member Kelly, seconded by Member Turner and carried unanimously. (Assessment levied by Resolution later in Minutes.) 3. AQUATIC WEED IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ -88 Location: Indianhead Lake and Mill Pond Assistant Manager Hughes presented analysis of assessment showing total cost for Indianhead Lake of $6,893.00 proposed to be assessed against 33 homes at $208.87 per home and total cost for the Mill Pond of $7,418.00 proposed to be assessed against 63 homes. One year assessment to be paid in 1989. Steven Snyder, 4601 Sunnyside Road, stated his objection referred to that portion of the assessment that relates to the use of chemicals to control aquatic vegetation. He reiterated he objection as stated in his letter of September 10, 1988 and said, in his opinion, what needs to be addressed is some type of policy to begin a restriction on fertilizer run -off that is occurring into Minnehaha Creek and the Mill Pond that causes the algae and weed growth. He suggested that when the notice of the assessment is sent that the landowners along the creek and pond be told that there are options other than phosphorous based fertilizers that could be used on backyards sloping to the creek. Nitrogen based fertilizers are available and accomplish the same thing without stimulating the weed growth. He added that adjacent landowners don't realize the relationship between phosphorous fertilizers applied to areas sloping to the creek and pond and the weed growth that occurs in the Mill Pond. Also, steps should be taken to work with the up- stream communities to see if the same type of policy could be achieved which eventually would result in a beneficial impact in restoring the creek and the pond to a more natural condition. Following discussion of the issues raised by Mr. Snyder, Manager Rosland said staff would develop a proposed policy for future use of chemicals relating to Minnehaha Creek and the Mill Pond. No further objections were heard. Assessment approved by motion of Member Smith, seconded by Member Turner and carried unanimously. (Assessment levied by resolution later in Minutes. 4. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -272 Location: Dearborn Court in Dearborn Addition and Blake Woods Addition Engineer Hoffman presented analysis of assessment for Street Improvement No. BA -272 showing total construction cost of $14,230.70 proposed to be assessed against 10 lots at $1,423.07 per assessable lot, against estimated assessment of $2,241.18 per lot. Assessments to be spread over 10 years. No objections were heard and no wirtten objections to the proposed assessment were received hereto. Assessment approved by motion of Member Richards, seconded by Member Turner and carried unanimously. (Assessment levied by resolution later in Minutes.) 5. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -273 Location: Antrim Terrce in Edina Oaks Addition Engineer_ Hoffman presented analysis of assessment showing total construction cost of $10,523.35 for Street Improvement No. BA- 273 proposed to be assessed against 5 assessable lots at $2,104.67 per assessable lot, against estimated assessment of $2,284.50 per lot. Assessments are to be spread over 10 years. No objections were heard and no written objections to the proposed assessment were received hereto. Assessment approved by motion of Member Smith, seconded by Member Turner and carried unanimously. (Assessment levied by resolution later in Minutes.) 6. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -275 Location: Green Farms Road from the North line of Parkwood Knolls 21st Addition to the North line of Parkwood Knolls 22nd Addition. Apple Lane from Green Farms Road West to west to West line of Parkwood Knolls 22nd Addition Engineer Hoffman presented analysis of assessment showing total construction cost of $30,992.48 for Street Improvement No. BA -275 proposed to be assessed against 16 assessable lots at $1,9937.03 per assessable lot, against estimated assessment of $2,826.19 per lot. Assessments are to be spread over 10 years. Douglas Jordal, 5109 Green Farms Road, stated he did not object to the proposed assessment but that the road as constructed does not drain storm water from his property. Engineer Hoffman reponded that there may have been some settlement and that it can be repaired if necessary under warranty of the contract. No objections were heard and no written objections to the proposed assessment were received hereto. Assessment approved by motion of Member Smith, seconded by Member Turner and carried unanimously. (Assessment levied by resolution later in Minutes.) 7. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -276 Location: Green Farms Road from the North line of Parkwood Knolls 22nd Addition to Interlachen Road. Green Farms Court from Interlachen Road to cul -de -sac. Interlachen Court from Interlachen Road to cul -de -sac. Interlachen Road from West line of Interlachen Heights to 123 feet plus or minus East of Ridge Road Engineer Hoffman presented 'analysis of assessment showing total construction cost of $68,666.09 for Street Improvement No. BA -276 proposed to be assessed against 21 assessable lots at $3,235.04 per assessable lot and against 115 assessable feet at $6.35 per foot (curb /gutter only - 2 lots), against estimated assessment of $3,788.32 per lot and $6.25 per foot. Assessments are to be spread over 10 years. No objections were heard and no written objections to the proposed assessment were received hereto. Assessment approved by motion of Member Smith, seconded by Member Turner and carried unanimously. (Assessment levied by resolution later in Minutes.) Following the presentation of analysis of assessments and approval, Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED ON ACCOUNT OF VARIOUS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City has given notice of hearings as required by law on the proposed assessment rolls for the improvements hereinafter referred to, and at such hearings held on September 19, 1988, has considered all oral and written objections presented against the levy of such assessments. 2. Each of the assessments as set forth in the assessment rolls on file in the office of the City Clerk for the following improvements: Tree Removal Project No. TR -88 Aquatic Weeds Improvement No. BA -272 Street Improvement No. BA -272 Street Improvement No. BA -273 Street Improvement No. BA -275 Street Improvement No. BA -276 does not exceed the local benefits conferred by said improvements upon the lot, tract or parcel of land so assessed, and all of said assessments are hereby adopted and confirmed as the proper assessments on account of said respective Improvements to be spread against the benefitted lots, parcels and tracts of land described therein. 3. The assessments shall be payable in equal annual'installments, the first of said installments, together with interest at a rate of 9.0% per annum on the entire assessment from the date hereof to December 31, 1989, to be payable with the general taxes for the year 1989. To each subsequent installment shall be added interest at the above rate for one year on all then unpaid installments. The number of such annual installments shall be as follows: Name of Improvement Number of Installments TREE REMOVAL PROJECT NO. TR -88 (LEVY NO. 11186) 1 year (LEVY NO. 11187 5 years AQUATIC WEED IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ -88 1 year STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -272 10 years STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -273 10 years STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA 7275 10 years STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -276 10 years 4. The City Clerk shall forthwith prepare and transmit to the County Auditor a copy of this resolution and a certified duplicate of said assessments with each then unpaid installment and interest set forth separately, to be extended on the tax lists of the County in accordance with this resolution. 5. The City Clerk shall also mail notice of any special assessment which may be payable by a county, by a political subdivision, or by the owner of any right -of -way as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.061, Subdivision 4, and if any such assessment is not paid in a single installment, the City Treasurer shall arrange for collection thereof in installments, as set forth in said Section. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. PRELIMINARY REZONING TO PSR -4 PLANNED SENIOR CITIZEN DISTRICT AND PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR ELDER HOMESTEAD (RPI SERVICES. INC.). Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Craig Larsen presented the request of RPI Services, Inc. for preliminary rezoning from PRD -4 Planned Residence District to PSR -4 Planned Senior Citizen District and preliminary plat approval for Elder Homestead, generally located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of York Avenue and Parklawn Avenue. The subject property is currently an undeveloped site of 83,302 square feet owned by 7500 York, which is located across Parklawn Avenue to the south, which is open space to satisfy their zoning requirements. The propoents are proposing to develop the subject property ultimately through a two -way swap of land with 7500 York after acquiring a vacant parcel immediately southwest of the site across Parklawn Avenue that is adjacent to 7500 York so that 7500 York may maintain its open space requirement. Planner Larsen explained that the vacant parcel immediately southwest of the subject site is currently within the Centennial Lakes project (Hedberg) and is zoned MDD -6 Mixed Development District. Following approval of the proposed development for the subject site, the vacant parcel would be rezoned from MMD -6 to PRS -4 Planned Residence District which would be the same as the zoning carried by 7500 York. The original proposal called for a four - story, 80 unit building with the units arranged in clusters. Since that time a revised plan has been submitted for a three - story, 72 unit building. All units would be arranged in 4 -unit clusters, each unit being approximately 450 square feet in area which would share a common parlor area of an additional 450 square feet. Individual units would have kitchen, sleeping and bathroom facilities. Planner Larsen pointed out that this use is a new concept in housing and the question arose as to whether the zoning should be Planned Senior Citizen District or as a nursing home. Staff took the position that since each unit for each resident will be complete and will have all facilities as opposed to a nursing home room that it should be zoned Planned Senior Citizen District. In effect, the use of the building will operate essentially as a nursing home. A site plan and conceptual floor plan has been submitted, together with a proof of parking plan as suggested by the Community Development and Planning Commission. Normally, for a 72 -unit building zoned Planned Senior Citizen District the Zoning Ordinance would require a total of 54 parking spaces, with 20 enclosed spaces. The developers would be required to enter into a proof of parking agreement so that, if in the future we found that the additional parking spaces were needed, the proponents would be forced to provide them. At this time, the garages would not be installed with the development of the project; 34 surface parking spaces would be provided as it is anticipated that the demand for parking will be minimal because of the age of the individuals who would occupy the units. The site plan illustrates a right turn in, right turn out from southbound York Avenue. The Planning Commission recommended that the curb cut be eliminated when they reviewed the project. Ultimately, it would have to approved by Hennepin County. Planner Larsen concluded his presentation by advising that the Planning Commission at its meeting of September 7, 1988 recommended preliminary rezoning and preliminary plat approval with several conditions including final rezoning, final plat approval, successful exchange of the parcels between the proponents and 7500 York, proof of parking agreement, standard 24 -foot drive aisle width, approved drainage and landscaping plans,.dedication of sufficient right of way along York Avenue sufficient to create a right turn in from southbound York to westbound Parklawn, understanding that the sidewalk along Parklawn would subject to their maintenance, and installation of street light wires for future traffic signals. Planner Larsen advised that the proponents were present to answer questions. Member Turner asked what is allowed in terms of density for the proposed zoning classification. Planner Larsen explained that the Zoning Ordinance limits the density of the site to 67 units by requiring a lot area of 1,250 square feet per dwelling unit. A credit of 250 square feet per unit would be applied if the project were within 2000 feet of the France Avenue I -494 interchange. The project is approximately 2800 feet from the interchange. If the credit were applied, 83 units would be permited on the site. Member Turner asked if the use for the site is what was envisioned regarding traffic in the southeast Edina area. Planner Larsen responded that in the context of traffic this is an excellent use and would be a low traffic generator. Member Smith asked the proponents as to their success with this type of development. Arvid Elness, project architect, explained that they started this type of project four years ago in Minnetonka to provide a new form of care for the frail elderly that was not quite nursing home or apartment. Each 4 -unit cluster would be occupied by four individuals who essentially would live like a family, each with own kitchen and bath but also with a high care component. As to the market, it does not really fit the category of senior housing in the traditional sense. It will not compete for the independent more active seniors in their housing types scattered through the City. Mr. Elness reiterated the low impact the development would have on traffic in the area and also spoke in support of the curb cut on York Avenue, both as a convenient approach for emergency vehicles and visitors. In response to questions of Member Smith, Mr. Elness presented graphics and explained the features of each floor of the units. He indicated that it would be a very residential, non- institutional environment. Member Kelly asked what the units would rent for. Mr. Elness said that in their development in Minnetonka the rates are $1,400/1,700 per month or approximately 60% of the cost of a care package in a nursing home. The development is designed for individuals who basically can get through the day alright with a little bit of help, i.e. help with dressing, reminder to take medications, main meals prepared. He explained that there is no medical director in the context that you would have in a nursing home but all the orders for the residents who would live here are under the direction of a physician with a full quality assurance review program run by Methodist Hospital for the residents. All of the aides and nurses are part of a Medicare certified home health agency so that if any care is covered by Medicare that reimbursement can be gotten for the residents. No further comment or objection being heard, Member Kelly moved First Reading of the zoning ordinance and adoption of the resolution for preliminary plat approval as follows, subject to final rezoning, final plat approval, successful exchange of the parcels between the proponents and 7500 York, proof of parking agreement, standard 24 -foot drive aisle width, approved drainage and landscaping plans, dedication of sufficient right of way along York Avenue sufficient to create a right turn in from southbound York to westbound Parklawn, understanding that the sidewalk along Parklawn would be subject to their maintenance, and installation of street light wires for future traffic signals, and no curb cut on York Avenue: ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A27 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825) BY REZONING PROPERTY TO PSR -4 PLANNED SENIOR RESIDENCE FROM PRD -4 PLANNED RESIDENCE DISTRICT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS; Section 1. Section 6 of Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding the following thereto: "The extent of the Planned Senior Residence District (Sub- District PSR -4) is enlarged by the addition of the following property: Outlot A, Ebenezer Society lst Addition The extent of the PRD -4 Planned Residence District is reduced by removing the property described above from the PRD -4 District." Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR ELDER HOMESTEAD BE IT.RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "ELDER HOMESTEAD ", platted by RPI Services, Inc. and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of September 19, 1988, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval. Motion for First Reading of the ordiance and adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney First Reading granted, resolution adopted. PRELIMINARY REZONING TO R -2 DOUBLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT AND PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR ERHARDT ADDITION CONTINUED TO 10117188. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen presented the request for preliminary rezoning to R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District and preliminary plat approval for property located in the southeast quadrant of the Brookview Avenue/Valley View Road intersection. The Brookview Avenue side of the subject property is currently.developed with a single family dwelling with an out building existing on the easterly portion or Valley View Road side of the property. The site is defined as a through lot with 115 feet of frontage on Brookview Avenue and 156 feet of frontage on Valley View Road. The preliminary plat proposed to divide the property creating one new buildable lot. The new lot will front on Valley View Road. It is proposed that the new lot be zoned R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District to allow the construction of a double bungalow. The lot fronting on Brookview Avenue will remain as a single family dwelling lot. The new lot exceeds the lot width requirement for an R -2 lot but would require a variance from the 15,000 square foot lot area requirement; the lot contains 12,476 square feet. The remaining single family lot would require a variance from the 15 foot rear setback requirement and the 120 foot lot depth requirement; the lot measures 104 feet at the center. The Comprehensive Plan illustrates the area fronting on Valley View as suitable for low density attached residential. Existing buildings along Valley View Road contain between two and five units. Lot sizes range between 10,000 and 15,000 square feet. The R -2 lot immediately to the south of the subject property has an area of 11,500 square feet. Planner Larsen explained that despite the minor deficiencies from the ordinance requirements, staff believes there are several reasons to support the proposal. Lot Size - The area of the double dwelling unit lot.is below the requirement, however, it is compatible with the other R -2 properties in the vicinity. The R -1 lot exceeds the ordinance minimum as proposed and is larger than several other R -1 lots on Brookview. Character and Symmetry - The streetscape along Brookview Avenue will remain unchanged. The R -1 properties along.Brookview are not impacted by the proposal. The new double dwelling on Valley View Road will appropriately fill in a noticeable gap. The new unit will be developed within all required setbacks and orients logically to Valley View Road. Community Planning - The proposed plat and rezoning is consistent with the principles and land use designations set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. Planner Larsen advised that the proposal was considered by the Community Development. and Planning Commission on September 7, 1988 and recommended preliminary rezoning and plat approval, subject to final rezoning, final plat, subdivision dedication, curb cut location approval and separate utility connections. He noted that the proponents, Ronald and Robert Erhardt were present to answer questions. Ronald Erhardt gave a brief history of the subject property which was the home of his maternal grandparents. He stated that in the summer of 1987 they made inquiries as to the possibility of constructing a double bungalow on the rear of the lot. With the decease of their mother earlier this year, they are now pursuing the project with plans to live on this property when they retire. Member Turner asked if the Planning Commission discussed the substantial variances that are involved. Mr. Erhardt said the variances were discussed and the Commission's questions were answered. Member Turner then asked Mr. Ehrhardt to support their request for variances. Mr. Erhardt explained that most of the lots along Valley View square footage wise are smaller than the variance on the square footage on the proposed lot fronting on Valley View. In discussions with City staff and the surveyor it was determined that the proposal was the best use of that lot. Member Turner said the use makes sense but that she had trouble finding justification for the variances and that she was concerned about the impact on the single family neighborhood. Member Smith suggested that if the lot line were drawn perpendicular to Brookview Avenue instead of diagonally that the variance needed for the single family lot would not be as great and it would maintain a rectangular lot on Brookview . Member Richards commented that he did not feel there is justification for the requested variances so that there could be three dwelling units where now just one exists. Mr. Erhardt said that one of the questions raised at the Planning Commission meeting was how many units would the square footage of the subject property handle and the answer was a minimum of three. The issue then was should the existing house be removed in order to construct three units. The reponse was where there is an existing single family house that fits Brookview why not build a double on the back portion of the lot which would front on Valley View. There was further discussion on re- orienting the proposed lot line to eliminate the setback variance for the single family lot and how a double could be sited on the new lot fronting Valley View Road. Member Richards made a motion to continue the hearing for approval of the rezoning to R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District and preliminary plat for Erhardt Addition to the meeting of October 17, 1988 to give the proponents time to revise the preliminary plat and provide information on the sizes and dimensions of other lots in the area. Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. *PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR EDINA HIGHLANDS 2ND ADDITION CONTINUED TO 10/3/88. Motion was made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Turner to continue the hearing for preliminary plat approval for Edina HIghlands 2nd Addition to October 3, 1988, as requested by the proponent. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT GRANTED FOR EDINA COMMUNITY LUTHERAN CHURCH. Motion was made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Turner for adoption of the following resolution, subject to an executed Proof of Parking Agreement prior to issuance of a building permit: RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WHEREAS, the procedural requirements of Ordinance No. 825 (The Zoning Ordinance) have been met; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the Findings as required by Ordinance No. 825 have been satisfied; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina Ctiy Council hereby grants a Conditional Use Permit to Edina Community Lutheran Church, 4113 West 54th Street, for construction of a new sanctuary and conversion of the existing sanctuary to a fellowship hall. Motion carried on rollcall vote,,�five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON ISSUE OF DIVERTING TRAFFIC ON HALIFAX AVENUE. Engineer Fran Hoffman advised that approximately 800 notices were mailed to residents in northeast Edina regarding the hearing on diverting traffic on Halifax Avenue. The issue was referred to the Council for final action from the Traffic Safety Committee. Clearly, a split opinion exists on the Committee. Background - This hearing is a result of a petition from residents on Halifax Avenue asking that the traffic patterns on Halifax be changed by diverting traffic. Their concerns involved increasing through traffic travelling to and from the 50th /France commercial area. The residents appeared before the Traffic Safety Committee and the Committee recommended to the Council that a traffic diverter be placed at 51st and Halifax to prevent passage of traffic leaving the 50th /France area. The effect of the diverter resulted in an average daily traffic volume of 1,130 being reduced to an average of approximately 640. It had a positive effect on Halifax and a disadvantage for residents from 50th and 54th Streets between France Avenue on the east and Minnehaha Creek on the west who had to seek an alternate route. After a test period of two months the diverter was removed. The new traffic count with no diverter was 1,035 vehicles per day. From license plate studies, it was determined that the vast majority of the people who use Halifax Avenue live in the immediate neighborhood or in northwest Edina. The issue before the Council is whether Halifax Avenue is strictly a local residential street or functionally should work as a neighborhood collector street which serves as access to the 50th /France commercial area. As chairman of the Traffic Safety Committee, the following recommendations are presented: a) Leave situation as currently stands and review again after parking ramp is fully open and theatre is in operation, b) Re- install partial diverter as previously existed, and c) Final finding that Halifax functions as a neighborhood collector. Engineer Hoffman then described the four main types of streets within the City and explained the function of each. He also presented a graphic showing weekday and weekend traffic counts in the Halifax neighborhood before and after the traffic diverter was put in place in June and the impact of the diverter on other neighborhood streets. The Traffic Safety Committee in August recommended to the Council that the diverter be removed to see if that attempt had done anything to educate residents living in the subject area. In summary, the counts showed that approximately 100 vehicles per day less used Halifax Avenue. Engineer Hoffman advised that since the hearing notices were mailed 84 letters had been received in response., of which approximately 35 were in favor of reinstating the diverter and 49 were opposed. Member Smith commented that a number of the letters objected to the closing of Halifax and asked for a clarification. Engineer Hoffman said that the purpose of the diverter was just that, to divert traffic from traveling southbound on Halifax Avenue and that there had never been a proposal by the Committee or the Council to close off the street. Member Turner asked about street classification and by calling Halifax a neighborhood "collector" street as opposed to a local residential street would it simply be a matter of reflecting the kind of use of the street or does it mean anything more. Engineer Hoffman commented that it is something to be aware of but that it would not be identified on the map as a city collector street which normally would have traffic counts of 2 -3,000 vehicles per day or because it leads to some other connecting point on an arterial street. The vehicular use of Halifax Avenue is at the upper end as a local residential street which puts it in a gray area as to its function and therefore the Committee did not have a strong recommendation on the issue. Mayor Courtney then called for public comment. Speaking in support of diverting traffic on Halifax Avenue from West 51st Street to West 54th Street were: Sharon Maetzold, 5114 Halifax Av; John Crist, 5324 Halifax Av, who presented results of surveys of Halifax Avenue residents; Ann Bishop, 5324 Halifax Av; Teresa Forliti, 6336 Halifax Av; Jerry Bonn, 5241 Halifax Av; Suzanne Kuntz, 5125 Halifax Av; unidentified woman on St. Johns Av; Mary Thatcher, 5309 Halifax Av; Marsha Bushok, 5312 Halifax Av on behalf of Dorothy LaJoie, 5229 Halifax Av; Dan Smiley, 5308 Halifax Av; Randy Hosler, 5133 Halifax Av; John Meenan, 5300 Halifax Av; and Mike Palm, 5308 Oaklawn Av. Speaking in opposition to the diverter were: Tom Kroth, 4075 W. 51st St; John Mackey, 4617 W. 56th St; unidentified man from The Lanterns; Bill McKinney, 5600 Kellogg P1; Charles Brown, 5029 Bruce Av; Elwell McVeety, 5616 Kellogg P1; Linda Maetzold, 5110 Arden Av; Douglas Reite, 5421 Halifax Ln; Roger Bildscen, 5100 Juanita Av; David Kotkov, 5105 Indianola Av; and Laurie Grotz, 5513 Park P1. Member Turner's motion to close the public hearing was seconded by Member Smith. Motion carried, five ayes. Member Turner commented that she agreed there was a traffic problem not only on Halifax but in the entire neighborhood; that whether or not we call this road a residential street or a neighborhood collector that the City should try to manage the volume, speed and safety situation on Halifax Avenue. Member Turner said that she was opposed to a barrier but felt the following suggestions made the most sense: a) more intense enforcement by the Traffic Enforcement Unit which will impact speed and those who do not heed the stop sign and may eventually impact traffic volume, b) although a local decision, she said if she lived on Halifax she would attempt to get sidewalks installed in view of the number of young children on the street, c) posting advisory speed limit of 25 mph, and d) annual review of the traffic pattern in the area keeping in mind the commercial changes at 50th /France and to make sure that the decisions made for the commerial areas do not negatively impact the residential neighborhoods. Member Turner moved the following action with regard to the Halifax Avenue issues: 1) intense enforcement by the Traffic Enforcement Unit, 2) that a local decision be made regarding sidewalks, 3) posting of 25 mph advisory speed limit signs, and 4) review the area annually as to traffic patterns. Motion was seconded by Member Richards. Member Smith commented that Halifax Avenue is a narrow street with no sidewalks and is not good geographically. In listening to the public comments, the problem is not created by the people living on Halifax but by residents from other streets who are using Halifax to access the 50th /France area. He said he wished there was a way to solve the Halifax problem without impacting the residents on neighboring streets, that he agreed that the streets belong to all the residents of the City, and that the Council has a responsibility to all the residents as well as to those on Halifax Avenue. With the current trend in society of one car per person in a household, traffic volumes will continue to increase. He added that he still is a supporter of the barricade, but that has been tempered somewhat by the comments heard, and that the elements of Member Turner's motion make sense, but that he would like to have the Traffic Enforcement Unit specify what they would do in terms of enforcement. Further, Member Smith said he objected to the suggestion to reclassify the function of Halifax Avenue. Mayor Courtney urged the residents of Halifax Avenue to seriously consider the construction of sidewalks to provide safety for children and pedestrians. Member Kelly commented that she would like to protect all neighborhood residential streets, that this is a hard decision because it involves one street's rights against another, but that she could support the motion. She said that sidewalks would be a good idea and that maybe parking could be limited to one side only. She urged the residents of the entire area to work together to provide safety for the residents on Halifax Avenue. Member Richards said that there is a sense that the people who are causing the traffic problem are from outside the neighborhood (the larger community of Edina) and asked that the 50th /France Business and Professional Association do an analysis to find out where their business is coming from but if it is the Edina residents that are causing the traffic he would not vote for closing Halifax or any other street; that it is a legitimate concern and if we find that the traffic is coming from outside we should take steps to correct that. Mayor Courtney then called for a rollcall vote on the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 1105 ESTABLISHING A STORM WATER DRAINAGE UTILITY ADOPTED: SECOND READING WAIVED. Engineer Hoffman advised that at the conclusion of the public hearing conducted on August 15, 1988 on a storm drainage utility, the Council had authorized development of an ordinance to establish same. At the hearing the Council had requested additional information on two issues: 1) fee structure for schools vs. churches, and 2) tax benefits for citizens. Staff had looked at land uses and had assiged equivalency factors in terms of storm water runoff. In reviewing the analysis for each school and church site, the school ratio that was developed was exact. The analysis had produced 10 classes of land uses. With regard to churches, staff found that the smaller the site the larger was the impervious percentage. It was finally determined that 40/50% impervious was where we ought to be for churches. Engineer Hoffman presented a graphic showing that the financial impact of the school and church ratio was very small when considering the utility system as a whole. Regarding tax implications, for single and double family units the annual fee would be $20.00 of which there could be several dollars tax savings. For multiple, commercial and industrial, those properties would probably pass the cost on and would not probably change how they operate. Schools, churches, institutions, parks, golf courses and cemeteries in some cases may not pay any taxes whatsoever. He recalled that the storm water drainage utility proposal was not to use a general tax increase but to establish a utility fund to provide for storm drainage improvements. He said that one other question was the class for institutional. Some of these properties look like commercial properties, i.e. Fairview Southdale Hospital, YMCA, and have enough. hard surface to be placed in the commercial category. Staff would suggest that the institutional category be dropped and those properties be called commercial. For the benefit of the public present, Engineer- Hoffman explained that the storm water drainage utility ordinance is up for First'Reading and if the Council grants First Reading that later in the agenda Council will act on the proposal to sell revenue bonds to provide the funding to start some of the storm drainage projects. Member Smith questioned dropping the institutional category. Attorney Erickson suggested that commercial and institutional be combined. No further comment being heard, Member Smith moved First Reading and adoption of the ordinance, with waiver of Second Reading as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 1105 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A STORM WATER DRAINAGE UTILITY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Storm Water Drainage Utility. (a) Storm Water Drainage Utility Established. The municipal storm sewer system shall be operated as a public utility pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section 444.075 from which revenues will be derived subject to the provisions of this Ordinance and Minnesota statutes. The storm water drainage utility will be part of the Public Works Department and under the administration of the Public Works Director. (b) Definitions. (1) Residential equivalent factor, (REF) - One (1) REF is defined as the ratio of the average volume of runoff generated by one (1) acre of a land use to the average volume of runoff generated by one (1) acre of typical single family residential land, during a standard one (1) year rainfall event. Section II. Storm Water Drainage Fees. Storm water drainage fees for parcels of land shall be determined by multiplying the REF for a parcel's land use by the parcel's acreage and then multiplying the resulting product by the storm water drainage rate. The REF values for various land uses are as follows: CLASS LAND USES REF 1 Single & Double Family 1.00 2 Multiple 3.00 3 Commercial /Institutional 5.00 4 Schools 1.25 5 Churches 3.00 6 Parks .25 7 Golf Courses .25 8 Cemeteries .25 9 Industrial 5.00 For purpose of calculating storm water drainage fees, all developed one family and duplex parcels shall be considered to have an acreage of .37 acre. The storm water drainage rate shall be $5.00 per quarter per REF -acre. (a) Adjustments. The Council may adopt policies recommended by the Public Works Director, by resolution, for adjustment of the storm water drainage fee for parcels based upon hydrologic data to be supplied by property owners, which data demonstrates a hydrologic response substantially different from the standards used by City to establish the REF. Such adjustments of storm water drainage fees shall not be made retroactively. (b) Exemptions. The following land uses are exempt from storm water drainage fees. (1) Public rights of way. (2) Vacant, unimproved land with ground cover. Section III. Payment of Fee. Statements for storm water drainage fee shall be computed every three (3) months and invoiced by the Finance Department for each account on or about the twentieth (20th) day of the month following the quarter. Such statement shall be due on or before the day of the month stated on the billing. Any prepayment or overpayment of charges shall be retained by the City and applied against subsequent quarterly fees. (a) Recalculation of Fee. If a property owner or person responsible for paying the storm water drainage fee questions the correctness of an invoice for such charge, such person may have the determination of the charge recomputed by written request to the Public Works Director made within sixty (60) days of mailing of the invoice in question by the City. (b)„ Penalty for Late Payment. Each quarterly billing for storm water drainage fees not paid when due shall incur a penalty charge of ten percent (10 %) of the amount past due. (c) Certification of Past Due Fees on Taxes. Any past due storm water drainage fees in excess of ninety (90) days past due on October 1 of any year may be certified to the County Auditor for collection with real estate taxes in the folowing year pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section 444.075, Subdivision 3. In addition the City shall also have the right to bring a civil action or to take other legal remedies to collect unpaid fees. Section IV. The City Council may, by ordinance, increase, diminish or change the amount and basis of the drainage fee herein established, from time to time. Section V. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication. ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner Nays: Courtney Ordinance adopted. Mayor Courtney stated he voted no because of waiver of Second Reading. *BID AWARDED FOR ONE TEST WELL FOR WELL DEVELOPMENT. Motion was made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Turner for award of bid for one test well for well development to recommended low bidder, Keys Well Drilling, at $17,850.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -44 (GLEASON RD FROM VALLEY VIEW RD TO LOCHMOOR DRIVE - CONTRACT #88 -7). Motion was made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Turner for award of bid for Sidewalk Improvement No. S -44 (Gleason Road from Valley View Road to Lochmoor Drive - Contract #88 -7) to recommended low bidder, Gunderson Brothers Cement Contractors Company, Inc., at $72,945.15. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 APPROVED. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Turner to approve the following recommended action listed in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of September 13, 1988: 1).To implement the engineering recommendations of advisory signing and road resurfacing in the 7600 block of Gleason Road along with installation of bollard and chain based on concurrence by affected residents, 2) Installation of "NO PARKING, 8 AM -4PM, SCHOOL DAYS" signs on both sides of Chapel Lane, and to acknowledge Sections B and C of the Minutes. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. SEWER AND WATER RATES INCREASE APPROVED. Manager Rosland recalled that the proposed sewer and water rate increases were considered by the Council at its meeting of August 1, 1988 at which time the Council had asked staff to run calculations with the water rate minimum remaining at the current level and to bring the matter back following the public hearing on the storm water utility. Finance Director John Wallin advised that after reviewing the projections staff believes the objectives can be accomplished by way of a $.07 per 100 cu. ft. water rate increase rather than a $.09 increase as presented earlier. Staff continues to recommend a sewer rate increase from $1.10 cu. ft. to $1.15 per 100 cu. ft. in order to cover MWCC charges. Based upon Council direction, it is proposed to maintain the current minimum charge of $27.10 rather than to increase it to $31.40 as previously recommended. However, it is suggested that this minimum charge should apply for the first 1800 cu. ft. of usage rather than the present 2000 cu. ft. threshold. This recommendation is made in order to avoid a new tier system. Reducing the minimum to 1800 cu. ft. would have little effect on most small water and sewer users and the cost impact for those users between 1800 cu. ft. and 2000 cu. ft. would be nominal. The $.07 per 100 cu. ft. water rate increase would increase total revenues by approximately $210,000 which should cover costs for capital improvements as well as operating costs. No comment being heard, Member Smith moved approval of the following water and sewer rates: Water $.40 per 100 cu. ft. Sewer $1.15 per 100 cu. ft. Minimum Charge $27.10 for first 1800 cu. ft. Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes :' Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. EDINA GOLF DOME PURCHASE APPROVED. Manager Rosland recalled that at its meeting of September 12, 1988 the Council had considered the proposal to purchase the Edina Golf Dome. The Council had continued the matter so that additional information could be obtained for the Council. In reference to contacting W. H. McFadden, who had raised several questions by letter regarding the purchase, Manager Rosland said Mr. McFadden has been out of town but that he had met with a friend of Mr. McFadden who was involved with the letter. The Park Board also had considered the proposal at its meeting of September 13, 1988 and because of some misconceptions regarding the appraisal they voted to hold on their recommendation. Subsequently, after talking with Park Board Chairman Christianson, a meeting of the Park Board was held today at which three concerns were answered: 1) That the building owned by the City was included in the appraisal - Response, it was not; 2) If the dome was insurable - Response, yes it is insurable which is included in the proposed cost analysis; and 3) What happens if we have a very cold winter, will the heat go up - Response, the cost analysis took into account a raise in heating costs. Manager Rosland said that the proposed bonds are based on a 10 -year amortization schedule which was also included in the cost analysis and it still shows a projected cash flow of $48,000 - 50,000. He reiterated that one of the key reasons for the purchase of the golf dome is to help pay for the bond indebtedness for improvements to Braemar Arena. Also, it will enable the balancing of work for fulltime employees at Braemar Golf Course during the winter months. Manager Rosland stated that following the presentation of the additional information the Board voted to recommend purchase by the City of the Edina Golf Dome. He noted that if the Council approved the purchase that later in the agenda the proposed recreational bond sale will include an increase of $575,000 to fund the purchase. Following discussion on the proposal, Member Turner moved adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED that the.City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota hereby approves the purchase by the City of the Edina Golf Dome at a cost of $575,000, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute a Purchase Agreement between Golf Domes, Inc. a Minnesota corporation, as Seller, and the City of Edina, a Minnesota corporation, as Buyer, for acquisition of same. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Mayor Courtney. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Nays: Smith Resolution adopted. REPORT ON RADON GAS REFERRED TO COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Sanitarian Dave Velde commented that there has been a lot of media lately about radon gas in homes and at this time we are uncertain as to what levels exist in the City of Edina. Radon is an odorless, colorless and tasteless radioactive gas that occurs naturally in the environment as a decay product of uranium and thorium, elements found in the earth's crust. Radon is an inert, or chemically inactive gas. As radon decays, it breaks down into more chemically active particles. Exposure to high concentrations of radon has been associated with lung cancer in underground miners working in poorly ventilated areas. The potential for significant public health impact due to chronic exposure to low level radon concentrations is being examined by the scientific community. Radon enters a building through cracks or openings that are exposed to the surrounding soil, e.g. sewer pipes, sump pumps, cracks in the foundation, joints between walls and floors. He explained that radon concentrations are commonly expressed in picoCurie per liter (pCi /1) of air - a common unit of measurement of the concentration of radioactivity in a substance. A state -wide survey was done in 1,000 homes in Minnesota over the last three months and the levels found ranged from 0.5 picoCuries per liter up to 42. The action level according to EPA would be 4 picoCuries per liter and for anything above that level the homeowner should take some action to reduce the chance for radon entering the home. In speaking with the Minnesota Department of Health it was learned that six homes have been tested in Edina and the radon concentrations ranged from 0.9 to 16.5 picoCuries per liter. The Minnesota Department of Health would not share information as to locations. Sanitarian Velde recommended that the City purchase 10 radon detection kits and ask for volunteers in the community to place them in their homes. The kits would be the short -term charcoal canisters and the testing is proposed for the months of December and January. Member Smith said he would rather see the funds used to inform residents where they can purchase the kits to do their own testing rather than for the City to get into the testing business. Mr. Velde said it was not his intention to develop a testing program but rather to do a sampling in the community to add to the data base. Member Smith said there are enough public facilities to obtain a sampling. Member Turner asked if the same date could be obtained using public buildings. Mr. Velde said the reason for the concern of radon in homes more recently is because of the energy conservation measures that have taken place in construction of homes. Sampling could probably be done in some of the newer public facilities and some kind of reading could be gotten but it would not duplicate a home environment. Following further discussion, Member Kelly moved that this be referred to the Community Health Services Advisory Committee for their recommendation to be brought back to the Council on October 3, 1988. Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Nays: Smith Motion carried. 1988 NLC CONGRESS OF CITIES TO BE HELD DECEMBER 3 -7 DISCUSSED. Manager Rosland called the Council's attention to the 1988 NLC Congress of Cities to be held in Boston on December 3 -7 and suggested that the Council consider if any member should attend. Member Turner reminded the Council that approximately a year and a half ago the Council had budgeted funds and had felt it was important to send someone. Following discussion, Manager Rosland suggested that the Council study the brochure and discuss this further at the meeting of October 3, 1988. The Council informally agreed to this procedure. *STATUS OF WEST 69TH STREET BETWEEN FRANCE/YORK NOTED. A written report by the City Engineer stated that the Center Companies, Galleria and City staff met once to discuss the issue of West 69th Street as it abuts both properties. The results of the meeting were that the traffic engineers for both parties and City engineering staff work out a traffic flow plan acceptable to both sides. The engineers have met and reached an alternative solution which should meet traffic demands on both sides of the street. The geometric details have yet to be finalized but the plans are developed enough that City staff would accept the preliminary plans as a guide to follow in development of preliminary construction plans. No action is needed by the Council at this time. *PETITION FOR WATERMAIN EXTENSION FOR 10 AND 11 WOODLAND ROAD REFERRED TO ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT.- Motion was made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Turner to refer the petition for watermain extension for 10 and 11 Woodland Road to the Engineering Department for processing. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. PARK BOARD MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 TO BE DISCUSSED. Member Richards asked that the Council save for future discussion the Park Board Minutes of September 13, 1988 with regard to several issues: 1) Creation of Braemar Golf Association, 2) Dekhockey Proposal for Lewis Park, and 3) Evergreen Bible Church Proposal to Rent Arneson Acres. He said he was concerned about who makes these decisions and felt that the Council has the ultimate responsibility. PHILOSOPHICAL DISCUSSION ON BUDGET PROCESS REQUESTED. Member Smith asked that the Council hold a philosophical discussion on the budget process as to creativity and funding for new programs. Member Turner said that some of those issues should come out when the 1989 Budget is adopted at the next meeting. Manager Rosland advised that as requested by the Council additional information has been provided concerning the proposed 1989 Budget and asked that the Council Members call staff if they have further questions so that the answers can be provided prior to the meeting on October 3, 1988 when the budget will be adopted. LETTER FROM DR. BYRON ARMSTRONG NOTED. Manager Rosland referred to a letter dated September 14, 1988 from Dr. Byron Armstrong, 4119 W. 62nd Street, regarding several issues affecting his property. He said staff would research the facts as the City perceives the issues and would provide that information for the Council before responding to Dr. Armstrong. RESOLUTION ADOPTED AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE AND SALE OF $10,175,000 G.O. TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1988: $5,100.000 G.O. TAXABLE TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1988: $3.160.000 UTILITY REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1988: AND $2.470.000 G.O. RECREATIONAL FACILITY BONDS, SERIES 1988. Manager Rosland recommended that the Council authorize the issuance and public sale of bonds to finance the Hedberg project as well as the storm sewer utility projects, water utility projects and the arena project. In regard to the Hedberg project, it is recommended that the City solicit bids only for the bonds necessary to finance the acquisition of the public property, pay park fees, and cover legal and administrative costs. It is- suggested that bonds to finance the park improvements and other development related costs be sold later after the land acquisition phase is completed. Member Richards introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO $10,175,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1988; AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND CALLING FOR THE PUBLIC SALE THEREOF BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), as follows: 1. Authorization. 1.01. Pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178 Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, the City Council of the City does authorize the issuance and sale of its General Obligation Tag Increment Bonds, Series 1988 (the Bonds) in the principal amount of $10,175,000, including every item of cost of the kinds authorized in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.56, $190,000 of such amount representing interest as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.56, for the purpose of providing funds for the payment of a portion of the public redevelopment costs to be paid or incurred by the City and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the HRA) in connection with a redevelopment project being undertaken pursuant to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan of the HRA. 2. Sale. This Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the notice of sale hereinafter prescribed for the purpose of receiving sealed bids and awarding sale of the Bonds. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause a public notice of the time, place and purpose of the meeting to be published in the official newspaper of the City, and in a daily or weekly periodical, published in a Minnesota City of the first class, which circulates throughout the state and furnishes financial news as a part of its service, once not less than ten days before the date of said meeting in substantially the following form: NOTICE OF BOND SALE $10,175,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1988 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that sealed bids for the purchase of $10,175,000 General Obligation Tag Increment Bonds, Series 1988, (the Bonds), of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), will be received at the office of the City Manager until 2:00 o'clock p.m., on Monday, October 3, 1988, at which time the bids will be opened and tabulated. The City Council will meet in the City Hall in the City at 7:00 o'clock, p.m., that same date to consider the bids and award the sale of the Bonds. The Bonds will be issued to finance a redevelopment project to be undertaken by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota. The Bonds will -be issuable as fully registered bonds in the denomination of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof, will be dated, as originally issued, as of October 1, 1988, and will mature on February 1 in each year as follows: Year Amount Year Amount Year Amount 1995 $250,000 2000 $425,000 2005 $ 750,000 1996 75,000 2001 475,000 2006 825,000 1997 175,000 2002 525,000 2007 1,325,000 1998 250,000 2003 625,000 2008 1,650,000 1999 325,000 2004 700,000 2009 1,800,000 Interest will be payable on each February 1 and August 1 commencing August 1, 1989, to the registered owners of the Bonds appearing of record in the bond register as of the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month. Bonds maturing in 1999 and later years are each subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the City and in whole or in part, and if in part, inverse order of maturities and by lot assigned in proportion to their principal amount within any maturity, on February 1, 1988 and any interest payment date thereafter at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus accrued interest. A legal opinion will be furnished by Dorsey & Whitney, of Minneapolis, Minnesota. Copies of a statement of Terms and Conditions of Sale and additional information may be obtained from the undersigned or from Public Financial Systems, Inc., 512 Nicollet Mall, Suite 550, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402; telephone 612 - 333 -9177, financial consultants to the City. Dated: September 19, 1988. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL. Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk City of Edina, Minnesota 3. Terms and Conditions of Sale. The following statement of Terms and Conditions of Sale shall constitute the terms and conditions for the sale and issuance of the Bonds and such terms and conditions are hereby authorized to be incorporated in material distributed to prospective bidders for the Bonds: $10,175,000 G.O. Tax Increment Bonds Notice of Sale/Terms and Conditions Sealed bids for the purchase of $10,175,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1988 (the Bonds) of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) will be received at the office of the City Manager, until 2:00 p.m., on Monday, October 3, 1988, when they will be opened, read and tabulated. The bids will be presented to the City Council for consideration at a meeting to be held at the City Hall at 7:OO p.m. on the same date. This is a statement of the terms and conditions upon which the bids for the Bonds will be received, the sale thereof awarded and the Bonds issued. Purpose The Bonds will be issued for the purpose of financing a portion of the public costs of the S.E. Edina Redevelopment Project Area, in the principal amount of $10,175,000 in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 475 and 469. Type. Denomination and Maturities The Bonds will bear a date of original issue as of October 1, 1988, will be in fully registered form and in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof, of single maturities, and will mature on February l in the following years and amounts: Year Amount Year Amount Year Amount 1995 $250,000 2000 $425,000 2005 $ 750,000 1996 75,000 2001 475,000 2006 825,000 1997 175,000 2002 525,000 2007 1,325,000 1998 250,000 2003 625,000 2008 1,650,000 1999 325,000 2004 700,000 1009 1,800,000 Redemption The Bonds maturing in 1999 and subsequent years will each be subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the City, in whole or in part and if in part, in inverse order of maturities and by lot within a maturity, on February 1, 1998 and any interest payment date thereafter, at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. Interest Payment Dates and Rates Interest will be payable on August 1, 1989 and semiannually thereafter on each August 1 and February 1, to the registered owners of the Bonds appearing of record in the bond register as of the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month. All Bonds of the same maturity must bear interest from date of original issue until paid at a single, uniform rate, not exceeding the rate specified for Bonds of any subsequent maturity. Each rate must be expressed in an integral multiple of 1/8 or 5/100 of 1 %, not exceeding the rate specified for Bonds of any subsequent maturity. Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent The City will designate and contract with a bank, financial institution or trust company to act- - -as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the Registrar). The Bond Register will be kept, principal and interest will be paid to the registered owner of each Bond and transfers of ownership will be effected by the Registrar. The City will pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for such services. The City reserves the right to remove the Registrar and appoint a successor. Delivery Within 40 days after the sale, the City will deliver to the Registrar the printed Bonds ready for completion and authentication. The original purchaser of the Bonds must notify the Registrar, at least five business days before delivery of the Bonds, of the persons in whose names the bonds will be initially registered and the authorized denominations of the Bonds to be originally issued. If notification is not received by that date, the Bonds will be registered in the name of the original purchaser and will be issued in denominations corresponding to the principal maturities of the Bonds. On the day of closing, the City will furnish to the purchaser the opinion of bond counsel hereinafter described, an arbitrage certification and a certificate verifying that no litigation in any manner questioning the validity of the Bonds is then pending or, to the best knowledge of officers of the City, threatened. Payment for the.Bonds must be received by.the City at its designated depository on the date of closing in immediately available funds. Legal Opinion An opinion as to the validity of the Bonds and the exemption from taxation of the interest thereon will be furnished by Dorsey & 'Whitney, of Minneapolis, Minnesota and will be printed on the Bonds. The legal opinion will state that the Bonds are valid and binding general obligations of the City enforceable in accordance with their terms, except to the extent to which enforceability may be limited by state or United States laws relating to bankruptcy; reorganization, moratorium or creditors' rights. Type of Bid and Award Sealed bids must be mailed or delivered to the undersigned and must be received prior to the time established above for the opening of bids. Each bid must be unconditional. A good faith deposit in the amount of $203,500 must be submitted with each bid. The good faith deposit must be in the form of a certified or cashiers check or bank draft. The good faith deposit will be retained by the City as liquidated damages if the bid is accepted and the bidder fails to comply therewith. The good faith deposit will be returned to the purchaser at the closing for the Bonds. The bid.authorizing the lowest net interest cost (total interest from date of Bonds to stated maturities less any cash premium or plus any discount) will be deemed the most favorable. No oral bid and no bid of less than $9,985,000 plus accrued interest on all of the Bonds will be considered and the City reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to waive any informality in any bid. CIISIP Numbers The City will assume no obligation for the assignment or printing of CIISIP numbers on the Bonds or for the correctness of any numbers printed thereon, but will permit such numbers to be assigned and printed at the expense of the purchaser, if the purchaser waives any delay in delivery occasioned thereby. Information for bidders and bidding forms may be obtained from the undersigned or from Public Financial Systems, Inc., 512 Nicollet Mall, Suite 550, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55403; telephone 612 - 333 -9177, financial consultants to the City. Dated: September 19, 1988. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL 4. Official Statement. The City Manager, in cooperation with Public Financial Systems, Inc., financial consultants to the City, is hereby authorized and directed to prepare on behalf of the City an official statement to be distributed to potential purchasers of the Bonds. Such official statement shall contain the statement of Terms and Conditions of Sale set forth in paragraph 3 hereof and such other information as shall be deemed advisable and necessary to adequately describe the City and the security for, and terms and conditions of, the Bonds. Adopted by the City Council on September 19, 1988. ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk Motion for adoption of the resolution was duly seconded by Member Turner and on vote being taken thereof, the following Council Members voted in favor: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney and the following voted against the same: None whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted and was signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. Member Turner.introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO $5,100,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION. TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1988; AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND CALLING FOR THE PUBLIC SALE THEREOF BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), as follows: 1. Authorization. Pursuant to the provision of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178 and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, the City Council of the City does authorize the issuance and sale of its General Obligation Taxable Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1988 (the Bonds) in the principal amount of $5,100,000, including every item of cost of the kinds authorized in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.56, $95,000 of such amount representing interest as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.56, for the purpose of providing funds for the payment of a portion of the public redevelopment costs to be paid or incurred by the City and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the HRA) in connection with a redevelopment project being undertaken pursuant to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan of the HRA. 2. Sale. This Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the notice of sale hereinafter prescribed for the purpose of receiving sealed bids and awarding sale of the Bonds. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause a public notice of the time, place and purpose of the meeting to be published in the official newspaper of the City, and in a daily or weekly periodical, published in a Minnesota City of the First class, which circulates thoughout the state and furnishes financial news as a part of its service,. once not less than ten days before the date of said meeting in substantially the following form: NOTICE OF BOND SALE $5,100,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAXABLE TAX INCREMENT .BONDS, SERIES 1988 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that.sealed bids for the purchase of $5,100,000 General Obligation Taxable Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1988 (the Bonds), of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), will be received at the office of the City Manager until 2:00 o'clock p.m., on Monday, October 3, 1988, at.which time the bids will be opened and tabulated. The City'Council will meet in the City Hall in the City at 7:00 o'clock, p.m., that same date to consider the bids and award the sale of the Bonds. The Bonds will be issued to finance a redevelopment project to be undertaken by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota. Interest on the Bonds will be,includible in gross income for federal and State of Minnesota income tax purposes. The Bonds will be issuable as fully registered bonds in the denomination of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof, will be dated, as originally issued, as of October 1, 1988, and will mature on February 1 in each year as follows: Year Amount Year Amount Year Amount 1995 $125,000 2000 $225,000 2005 $ 375,000 1996 50,000 2001 225,000 2006 450,000 1997 100,000 2002 250,000 .2007 650,000 1998 125,000 2003 300,000 2008 825,000 1999 150,000 2004 350,000 2009 900,000 Interest will be payable on each February 1 and August 1 commencing August 1, 1989, to the registered owners of the Bonds appearing of record in the bond register as of the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month. Bonds maturing in 1999 and later years are each subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the City and in whole or in part, and if in part, in inverse order of maturities and by lot assigned in proportion to their principal amount within a maturity, on February 1, 1998 and any interest payment date thereafter at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus accrued interest. A legal opinion as to the validity of the Bonds will be furnished by Dorsey & Whitney, of Minneapolis, Minnesota. Copies of a statement of Terms and Condition of Sale and additional information may be obtained from the undersigned or from Public Financial Systems, 512 Nicollet Mall, Suite 550, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402; telephone 612 - 333 -9177, financial consultants to the City. Dated: September.19, 1988. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk City of Edina, Minnesota 3. Terms and Conditions of Sale. The following statement of Terms and Conditions of Sale shall constitute the terms and conditions for the sale and issuance of the Bonds and such terms and conditions are hereby authorized to be incorporated in material distributed to prospective bidders for the Bonds: $5,100,000 G.O. Taxable Tax Increment Bonds Notice of Sale/Terms and Conditions Sealed bids for the purchase of $5,100,000 General Obligation Taxable Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1988 (the Bonds) of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) will be received at the office of the City Manager, until 2:00 p.m., on Monday, October 3, 1988, when they will be opened, read and tabulated. The bids will be presented to the City Council for consideration at a meeting to be held at the City Hall at 7:00 p.m. on the same date. This is a statement of the terms and conditions upon which the bids for the Bonds will be received, the sale thereof awarded and the Bonds issued. Purpose The Bonds will be issued for the purpose of financing a portion of the public costs of the S.E. Edina Redevelopment Project Area, in the principal amount.of $10,175,000 in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 475 and 469. Type, Denomination and Maturities The Bonds will bear a date of original issue as of October 1, 1988, will be in fully registered form and in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof, of single maturities, and will mature on February 1 in the following years and amounts: Year Amount Year Amount Year Amount 1995 $125,000 2000 $225,000 2005 $ 375,000 1996 50,000 2001 225,000 2006 450,000 1997 100,000 2002 250,000 2007 650,000 1998 125,000 2003 300,000 2008 825,000. 1999 150,000 2004 350,000 2009 900,000 Redemption The Bonds maturing in 1999 and subsequent years will each be subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the City, in whole or in part and if in part, in inverse order of maturities and by lot within a maturity, on February 1, 1998 and any interest payment date thereafter, at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. Interest Payment Dates and Rates Interest will be payable on August 1, 1989 and semiannually thereafter on each August 1 and February 1, to the registered owners of the Bonds appearing of record in the bond register as of the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month. All Bonds of the same maturity must bear interest from date of original issue until paid at a single, uniform rate, not exceeding the rate specified for Bonds of any subsequeent maturity. Each rate must be expressed in an integral multiple of 1/8 or 5/100 of 1$, not exceeding the rate specified for Bonds of any subsequent maturity. Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent The City will designate and contract with a bank, financial institution or trust company to act as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the Registrar). The Bond Register will be kept, principal and interest will be paid to the registered owner of each Bond and transfers of ownership will be effected by the Registrar. The City will pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for such services. The City reserves the right to remove the Registrar and appoint a successor. Delivery Within 40 days after the sale, the City will deliver to the Registrar the printed Bonds ready for completion and authentication. The original purchaser of the Bonds must notify the Registrar, at least five business days before delivery of the Bonds, of the persons in whose names the bonds will be initially registered and the authorized denominations of the Bonds to be originally issued. If notification is not received by that date, the Bonds will be registered in the name of the original purchaser and will be issued in denominations corresponding to the principal maturities of the Bonds. On the day of closing, the City will furnish to the purchaser the opinion of bond counsel hereinafter described, an arbitrage certification and a certificate verifying that no litigation in any manner questioning the validity of the Bonds is then pending or, to the best knowledge of officers of the City, threatened. Payment for the Bonds must be received by the City at its designated depository on the date of closing in immediately available funds. Legal Opinion An opinion as to the validity of.the Bonds and the exemption from taxation of the interest thereon will be furnished by Dorsey & Whitney, of Minneapolis, Minnesota and will be printed on the Bonds. The legal opinion will state that the Bonds are valid and binding general obligations of the City enforceable in accordance with their terms, except to the extent to which enforceability may be limited by state or United States laws relating to bankruptcy, reorganization, moratorium or creditors' rights. Tyne of Bid and Award Sealed bids must be mailed or delivered to the undersigned and must be received prior to the time established above for the opening of bids. Each bid must be unconditional. A good faith deposit in the amount of $102,000 must be submitted with each bid. The good faith deposit must be in the form of a certified or cashiers check or bank draft. The good faith deposit will be retained by the City as liquidated damages if the bid is accepted and the bidder fails to comply therewith. The good faith deposit will be returned to the purchaser at the closing for the Bonds. The bid authorizing the lowest net interest cost (total interest from date of Bonds to stated maturities less any cash premium or plus any discount) will be deemed the most favorable. No oral bid and no bid of less than $5,005,000 plus accrued interest on all of the Bonds will be considered and the City reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to waive any informality in any bid. CIISIP Numbers The City will assume no obligation for the assignment or printing of CIISIP numbers on the Bonds or for the correctness of any numbers printed thereon, but will permit such numbers to be assigned and printed at the expense of the purchaser, if the purchaser waives any delay in delivery occasioned thereby. Information for bidders and bidding forms may be obtained from the undersigned or from Public Financial Systems, Inc., 512 Nicollet Mall, Suite 550, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55403; telephone 612 - 333 -9177, financial consultants to the City. Dated: September 19, 1988. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL 4. Official Statement. The City Manager, in cooperation with Public Financial -Systems, Inc., financial consultants to-the City, is hereby authorized and directed to prepare on behalf of the City an official statement to be distributed to potential purchasers of the Bonds. Such official statement shall contain the statement of Terms and Conditions of Sale set forth in paragraph 3 hereof and such other information as shall be deemed advisable and necessary to adequately describe the City and the security for, and terms and conditions of, the Bonds. Adopted by the City Council on September 19, 1988. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor motion for adoption of the resolution was duly seconded by Member Smith and on vote being taken thereof, the following Council Members voted in favor: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney and the following voted against the same: None whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted and was signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO $3,160,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION UTILITY REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1988; AUTHORIZING.THE ISSUANCE AND CALLING FOR THE PUBLIC SALE THEREOF BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), as follows: 1. Authorization. It is hereby determined that it is necessary for the City to issue and sell its General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 1988, in the principal amount of $3,160,000 (the Bonds) to finance improvements to the City's municipal water and storm sewer systems as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 444.075; $59,500 of such amount representing interest as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.56. 2. Sale. This Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the notice of sale hereinafter prescribed for the purpose of receiving sealed bids and awarding sale of the Bonds.. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and purpose of said sale to be published at least ten days in advance of the bid opening in a legal newspaper having general circulation in the City, and in a periodical published in Minneapolis, Minnesota, giving financial news and of general circulation throughout the State, which notice shall be in substantially the following form: NOTICE OF BOND SALE $3,160,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION UTILITY REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1988 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Edina, Minnesota, will receive sealed bids for the purchase of $3,160,000 General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 1988, of the City (the Bonds), at the City Hall in Edina, Minnesota, until 2:00 p.m. on Monday, October 3, 1988, at which time the bids will be opened and tabulated. The City Council will meet at 7:00 p.m. the same day to consider such bids and award the sale of the Bonds. The Bonds will be issued for the purpose of financing improvements to the City's municipal water and.storm sewer systems. The Bonds will be issuable as fully registered bonds of single maturity, in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof, will be dated, as originally issued, as of October 1, 1988, and will mature on February 1 in the following years and amounts: Year Amount Year Amount 1990 $170,000 1995 $320,000 1991 250,000 1996 350,000 1992 275,000 1997 375,000 1993 300,000 1998 395,000 1994 300,000 1999 425,000 Interest will be payable on each February 1 and August 1, commencing August 1, 1989, to the registered owners of the Bonds appearing of record in the Bond Register as of the 15th day of the immediately preceding month. The rate of interest expressed for a maturity may not exceed the rate specified for Bonds of any subsequent maturity. Bonds having stated maturities in 1995 and later years are each subject to redemption, at the option of the City and in whole or in part, and if in part, in inverse order of maturities, and in $5,000 principal amounts selected by lot within a maturity, on February 1, 1994, and on any interest payment date thereafter equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued to the date of redemption. A legal opinion will be furnished by Dorsey & Whitney, of Minneapolis, Minnesota. Copies of a statement of Terms and Conditions of Sale and additional information may be obtained from the undersigned or from Public Financial Systems, Inc., 512 Nicollet Mall, Suite 550, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402; telephone 612 - 333 -9177, financial consultants to the City. Dated: September 19, 1988. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk City of Edina, Minnesota 3. Terms and Conditions of Sale. The following statement of Terms and Conditions of Sale shall constitute the terms and conditions for the sale and issuance of the Bonds and such terms and conditions are hereby authorized to be incorporated in material distributed to prospective bidders for the Bonds: $3,160,000 G.O. Utility Revenue Bonds Notice of Sale /Terms and Conditions Sealed bids for the purchase of $3,160,000 General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 1988 (the Bonds) of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) will be received at the office of the City Manager, until 2:00 p.m., on Monday, October 3, 1988, when they will be opened, read and tabulated. The bids will be presented to the City Council for consideration at a meeting to be held at the City Hall at 7:00 p.m. on the same date.. This is a statement of the terms and conditions upon which the bids for the Bonds will be received, the sale thereof awarded and the Bonds issued. Purpose The Bonds will be issued for the purpose of financing improvements to the municipal water and storm sewer systems in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 475 and 444. ,M a Denomination and Maturities The Bonds will bear a date of original issue as of October 1, 1988, will be in fully registered form and in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof, of single maturities, and will mature on February 1 in the following years and amounts: Year Amount Year Amount 1990 $170,000 1995 $320,000 1991 250,000 1996 350,000 1992 275,000 1997 375,000 1993 300,000 1998 395,000 1994 300,000 1999 425,000 Redemption The Bonds maturing in 1995 and subsequent years will each be subject to redemption and prepayment, at the option of the City, in whole or in part and if in part in inverse order of maturities and by lot within a maturity, on February 1, 1994 and any interest payment date thereafter, at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. Interest Payment Dates and Rates Interest will be payable on August 1, 1989 and semiannually thereafter on each February 1 and August 1, to the registered owners of the Bonds appearing of record in the bond register as of the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month. All Bonds of the same maturity must bear interest from date of original issue until paid at a single, uniform rate, not exceeding the rate specified for Bonds of any subsequent maturity. Each rate must be expressed in an integral multiple of 1/8 or 5/100 of 1$, not exceeding the rate specified for Bonds of any subsequent maturity. Bond Registrar. Transfer Agent and Paying Anent . The City will designate and contract with a bank, financial institution or trust company to act as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the Registrar). The Bond Register will be kept, principal and interest will be paid to the registered owner of each Bond and transfers of ownership will be effected by the Registrar. The City will pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for such services. The reserves the right to remove the Registrar and appoint a successor. Delivery Within 40 days after the sale, the City will deliver to the Registrar the printed Bonds ready for completion and authentication. The original purchaser of the Bonds must notify the Registrar, at least five business days before delivery of the Bonds, of the persons in whose names the bonds will be initially registered and the authorized denominations of the Bonds to be originally issued. If notification is not received by that date, the Bonds will be registered in the name of the original purchaser and will be issued in denominations corresponding to the principal maturities of the Bonds. On the day of closing, the City will furnish .to the purchaser the opinion of bond counsel hereinafter described, an arbitrage certification and a certificate verifying that no litigation in any manner questioning the validity of the Bonds is then pending or, to the best knowledge of officers of the City, threatened. Payment for the Bonds must be received by the City at its designated depository on the date of closing in immediately available funds. Legal Opinion An opinion as to the validity of the Bonds and the exemption from taxation of the interest thereon will be furnished by Dorsey-& Whitney, of Minneapolis, Minnesota and will be printed on the Bonds. The legal opinion will state that the Bonds are valid and binding general obligations of the City enforceable in accordance with their terms, except to the extent to which enforceability may be limited by state or United States laws relating to bankruptcy, reorganization, moratorium or creditors' rights. Type of Bid and Award Sealed bids must be mailed or delivered to the undersigned and must be received prior to the time established above for the opening of bids. Each bid must be unconditional. A good faith deposit in the amount of $63,200 must be submitted with each bid. The good faith deposit must be in the form of a certified or cashiers check or bank draft. The good faith deposit will be retained by the City as liquidated damages if the bid is accepted and the bidder fails to comply therewith. The good faith deposit will be returned to the purchaser at the closing for the Bonds. The bid authorizing the lowest net interest cost (total interest from date of Bonds to stated maturities less any cash premium or plus any discount) will be deemed the most favorable. No oral bid and no bid of less than $3,100,500 plus accrued interest on all of the Bonds will be considered and the City reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to waive any informality in any bid. CUSIP Numbers The City will assume no obligation for the assignment or printing of CUSIP numbers on the Bonds or for the correctness of any numbers printed thereon, but will permit such numbers to be assigned and printed at the expense of the purchaser, if the purchaser waives any delay in delivery occasioned thereby. .Information for bidders and bidding forms may be obtained from the undersigned or from Public Financial Systems, Inc., 512 Nicollet Mall, Suite 550, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55402; telephone 612 - 333 -9177, financial consultants to the City. Dated: September 19, 1988. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL 4. Official Statement. The City Manager and other officers of the City, in cooperation with Public Financial Systems, Inc., financial consultants to the City, are hereby authorized and directed to prepare on behalf of the City an official statement to be distributed to potential purchasers of the Bonds. Such official statement shall contain the statement of Terms and Conditions of Sale set forth in paragraph 3 hereof and such other information as shall be deemed advisable and necessary to describe accurately the City and the security for, and terms and conditions of, the Bonds. ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member Turner and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney and the following voted against the same: None whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO $2,470,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION RECREATIONAL FACILITY BONDS, SERIES 1988; AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLIC SALE THEREOF BE IT RESOLVED.by the City Council of theCity of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Authorization. It is hereby determined that it is necessary and beneficial for the City to construct improvements to the municipal golf course and ice arena. This Council further determines that in order to finance this acquisition and betterment of recreational facilities for the City, it is necessary for the City to issue and sell its General Obligation Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 1988 in the principal amount of $2,470,000 (the Bonds) pursuant to Minnesota Laws 1961, Chapter 655, and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, $46,000 of such amount representing interest as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.56. This Council estimates that the net revenues derived from the operation of the municipal golf course, the municipal ice arena and the municipal liquor- stores, in excess of the cost of operation and maintenance thereof, in the fiscal year which ended December 31, 1987, equals or exceeds the maximum amount of principal and interest to become due in any future fiscal year on all of the outstanding General Obligation Golf Course Bonds, Series 1985 of the City, dated as of September 1, 1985, and on the Bonds, as proposed to be issued under the terms set forth in this Resolution. Prior to the delivery of the Bonds to the purchaser, the Council will establish a fund for the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds. The Council will appropriate and credit to such fund an amount of revenues of the municipal liquor stores which is equal to the average annual amount of principal and interest to become due on the Bonds. 2. Sale. This Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the notice of sale hereafter prescribed for the purpose of receiving sealed bids and awarding sale of the Bonds. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause a public notice of the time, place and purpose of the meeting to be published in the official newspaper of the City, and in a daily or weekly periodical published in a Minnesota City of the first class, which circulates throughout the State and furnishes financial news as a part of its service, once not less then ten days before the date of said meeting in substantially the following form: NOTICE OF SALE $2,470,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION RECREATIONAL FACILITY BONDS, SERIES 1988 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that sealed bids for the purchase of $2,470,000 General Obligation Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 1988 (the Bonds), of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) will be received at the office of the City Manager until 2:00 p.m. on Monday, October 3, 1988, at which time the bids will be opened and tabulated. The City Council will meet in the City Hall in the City at 7:00 o /clock p.m. that same date to consider the bids and award the sale of the Bonds. The Bonds will be issued for the purpose of financing the construction of improvements to the City's municipal golf course and ice arena. The Bonds will be issuable as fully registered bonds in the denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof, will be dated, as originally issued, as of October 1, 1988, and will mature on January 1 in the following years and amounts: Year Amount Year Amount Year Amount 1992 $25,000 1998 . $25,000 2004 $225,000 1993 25,000 1999 25,000 2005 250,000 1994 25,000 2000 25,000 2006 270,000 1995 25,000 2001 175,000 2007 275,000 1996 259'000 2002 200,000 2008 325,000 1997 25,000 2003 200,000 2009 325,000 Interest will be payable on each January 1 and July 1 commencing July 1, 1989, to the registered owners of the Bonds appearing of record in the bond register as of the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the preceding month. Bonds maturing in 1999 and thereafter are subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the City and in whole or in part, and if in part, in inverse order of maturities and by'lot assigned in proportion to their principal amount within any maturity, on January 1, 1998 and any interest payment date thereafter, at .a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued to the date of redemption. A legal opinion with respect to each issue of the Bonds will be furnished by Dorsey & Whitney, of Minneapolis, Minnesota. Copies of a statement of Terms and Conditions of Sale and additional information may be obtained from the undersigned or from Public Financial Systems, Inc., 512 Nicollet Mall, Suite 550, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402; telephone 612 - 333 -9177, financial consultants to the City. Dated: September 19, 1988. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk 3. Terms and Conditions of Sale. The following shall constitute the terms and conditions for the sale and issuance of the Bonds, and the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause the following terms and conditions to be incorporated in material distributed to prospective bidders for the Bonds: $2,470,000 G.O. Recreational Facility Bonds Notice of Sale/Terms and Conditions Sealed bids for the purchase of $2,470,000 General Obligation Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 1988 (the Bonds) of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) will be received at the office of the City Manager, until 2:00 p.m., on Monday, October 3, 1988, when they will be opened, read and tabulated. The bids will be presented to the City.Council for consideration at a meeting to be held at the City Hall at 7:00 p.m. on the same date. This is a statement of the terms and conditions upon which the bids for the Bonds will be received, the sale thereof awarded and the Bonds issued. Purpose The Bonds will be issued for the purpose of financing improvements to the municipal golf course and ice arena in the principal amount of $2,470,000, in -accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475 and Minnesota Laws 1961, Chapter 655. Type, Denomination and Maturities The Bonds will bear a date of original issue as of October 1, 1988, will be in fully registered form and in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof, of single maturities, and will mature on January 1 in the following years and amounts: Year Amount Year Amount Year Amount 1992 $25,000 1998 $25,000 2004 $225,000 1993 25,000 1999 25,000 2005 250,000 1994 25,000 2000 25,000 2006 270,000 1995 25,000 2001 175,000 2007 275,000 1996 25,000 2002 200,000 2008 325,000 1997 25,000 2003 200,000 2009 325,000 Redemption The Bonds maturing in 1999 and subsequent years will each be subject to redemption and prepayment, at the option of the City, in whole or in part and if in part in inverse order of maturities and by lot within a maturity, on January 1, 1988 and any interest payment date thereafter, at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. Interest Payment Dates and Rates Interest will be payable on January 1, 1989 and semiannually thereafter on each July 1 and January 1, to the registered owners of the Bonds appearing of record in the bond register as of the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month. All Bonds of the same maturity must bear interest from date of original issue until paid at a single, uniform rate, not exceeding the rate specified for Bonds of any subsequent maturity. _Each rate must be expressed in an integral multiple of 1/8 or 5/100 of 1 %, not exceeding the rate specified for Bonds of any subsequent maturity. Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent The City will designate and contract with a bank, financial institution or trust company to act as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the Registrar). The Bond Register will be kept, principal and interest will be paid to the registered owner of each Bond and transfers of ownership will be effected by the Registrar. The City will pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for such services. The reserves the right to remove the Registrar and appoint a successor. Delivery Within 40 days after the sale, the City will deliver to the Registrar the printed Bonds ready for completion and authentication. The original purchaser of the Bonds must notify the Registrar, at least five business days before delivery of the Bonds, of the persons in whose names the bonds will be initially registered and the authorized denominations of the Bonds to be originally issued. If notification is not received by that date, the Bonds will be registered in the name of the original purchaser and will be issued in denominations corresponding to the principal maturities of the Bonds. On the day of closing, the City will furnish to the purchaser the opinion of bond counsel hereinafter described, an arbitrage certification and a certificate verifying that no litigation in any manner questioning the validity of the Bonds is then pending or, to the best knowledge of officers of the City, threatened. Payment for the Bonds must be received by the City at its designated depository on the date of closing in immediately available funds. Legal Opinion An opinion as to the validity of the Bonds and the exemption from taxation of the interest thereon will be furnished by Dorsey & Whitney, of Minneapolis, Minnesota and will be printed on the Bonds. The legal opinion will state that the Bonds are valid and binding general obligations of the City enforceable in accordance with their terms, except to the extent to which enforceability may be limited by state or United States laws relating to bankruptcy, reorganization, moratorium or creditors' rights. . Type of Bid and Award Sealed bids must be mailed or delivered to the undersigned and must be received prior to the time established above for the opening of bids. Each bid must be unconditional. A good faith deposit in the amount of $49,400 must be submitted with each bid. The good faith deposit must be in the form of a certified or cashiers check or bank draft. The good faith deposit will be retained by the City as liquidated damages if the bid is accepted and the bidder fails to comply therewith. The good faith deposit will be returned to the purchaser at the closing for the Bonds. The bid authorizing the lowest net interest cost (total interest from date of Bonds to stated maturities less any cash premium or plus any discount) will be deemed the most favorable. No oral bid and no bid of less than $2,424,000 plus accrued interest on all of the Bonds will be considered and the City reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to waive any informality in any bid. CIISIP Numbers The City will assume no obligation for the assignment or.printing.of CIISIP numbers on the Bonds or for the correctness of any numbers printed thereon, but will permit such numbers to be assigned and printed at the expense of the purchaser, if the purchaser waives any delay in delivery occasioned thereby. Information for bidders and bidding forms may be obtained from the undersigned or from Public Financial Systems, Inc., 512 Nicollet Mall, Suite 550, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55402; telephone 612 - 333 -9177, financial consultants to the City. Dated: September 19, 1988. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL 4. Official Statement. The City Manager and other officers of the City, in cooperation with Public Financial Systems, Inc., financial consultants to the City, are hereby authorized and directed to prepare on behalf of the City an official statement to be distributed to potential purchasers of the Bonds. Such official statement shall contain the statement of Terms and Conditions of Sale set forth in paragraph 3 hereof and such other information as shall be deemed advisable and necessary to describe accurately the City and the security for, and terms and conditions of, the Bonds. ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member Richards, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney and the following voted against the same: None whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. *CLAIMS PAID. Motion was made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Turner to approve payment of claims as per pre -list dated 9/19/88: General Fund $812,276.30, Art Center $3,042.30, Swimming Pool Fund $529.38, Golf Course Fund $16,600.11, Recreation Center Fund $303,764.12, Gun Range Fund $139.01, Edinborough Park $12,107.84, Utility Fund $7,512,68, Liquor Dispensary Fund $90,665.67, Construction Fund $34,455.34, Total $1,281,092.74 and for confirmation of payment of the following claims dated 8/31/88: General Fund $521,617.67, Art Center $866.12, Swimming Pool Fund $2,480.46, Golf Course Fund $20,341.09, Recreation Center Fund $6,385.35, Gun Range Fund $380.66, Edinborough Park $10,191.83, Utility Fund $47,080.14, Liquor Dispensary Fund $198,737:87, Construction Fund $9,288.64, Total $888817,369.83. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. There being no further business on the agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting adjourned at 12:00 midnight. City Clerk A. o e ch •' ~�bRPOM��O/ ,BeB REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KENNETH ROSLAND CITY MANAGER From: GORDON L. HUGHES ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER Date: JANUARY 9, 1989 Subject: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Recommendation: Agenda Item #III. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion Ell Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Adopt the attached resolution establishing the Development District and Tax Increment Financing District. Info/Background. On January 9, 1989. the City Council will conduct a public hearing concerning the establishment of a Development District for that portion of southeast Edina shown on Exhibit A. At the same time, the Council will consider establishing a Tax Increment Financing District covering a portion of the Development_District. The area comprising the Tax Increment Financing District is shown on Exhibit C. Increments collected from the T.I.F. District may be used to finance public improvements throughout the Development District. Notice of Public Hearing In accordance with State Law, notice of the January 9th hearing has been published in our official newspaper. Copies of the Development Program and 'Tax Increment Financing Plan (copy attached) were also forwarded to Hennepin County, the Richfield School District and the Edina School District on December 9, 1938. No comments have been received by these jurisdictions to date. I Reconmiendation and Report Economic Development District January 9. 1989 Page 2 Financing Plan The Tax Increment Financing Plan contains estimates for capital and administrative costs associated with contemplated projects. The Plan also contains estimates for the amount of increments expected to be captured from the proposed district. These estimates are provided in order that the City and other jurisdictions may analyze the effect of the new district on existing tax bases. As such, the estimates attempt to show the greatest impact that can now be anticipated. Approval of the Development District and Tax Increment Financing Plan does not constitute approval of particular projects or the sale of bunds. These matters will have to be considered by the Council in the future. Conmiunity Development and Plalulillg Commission Review The Community Development arid Planning Couunission reviewed the proposed Development District at its November 30. 1988 meeting. The following excerpt from the November 30 minutes provides the Commission's comments: SOUTHDALE AREA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Mr. Larsen explained to the Cuumiissiorl that the City Council would like Uieir comments on the Southdale Area Economic Development District. A discussion ensued with the Commission passing to the Council the following comment. "Arty improvements in the district, road or otherwise. should be assessed to the benefiting merchants or paid for with state aide. On the other hand, tax increment financing for the transit suine of this district is acceptable to the Planning Conmlission because it is an area -wide benefit." Enclosure ,a Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 89 -1 MAKING FINDINGS AND REQUESTING CERTIFICATION OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 89 -1 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. On January 9, 1989, this Council held a public hearing on the designation of Development District No. 1 (the "Development District ") and the adoption of the Development Program for Development District No. 1 (the "Program ") and on the adoption for Tax Increment Financing District 89 -1 (the "Tax Increment Financing Plan "), which establishes Tax Increment Financing District 89 -1 (the "Tax Increment District"), after notice of public hearing was published in the official newspaper of the City not less than 10 days prior to the date of the hearing. The City has consulted with its planning department on the designation of the Development District. All persons desiring to be heard at the hearing were given an opportunity to express their views. 2. Copies of the Program and the Tax Increment Financing Plan have been presented to this Council and are ordered placed on file with the City Clerk. The forms of the Program and Tax Increment Financing Plan are hereby approved and are incorporated herein by reference. 3. The Program and Tax Increment Financing Plan and the designation of the Development District and establishment of the Tax Increment Financing District are hereby approved. 4. It is hereby found that the Tax Increment District is a "Economic Development District," as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 12, in that the development anticipated to occur in the Tax Increment District will result in increased employment in the City and the preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the City. 5. Pursuant to Minnesotat-Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision 3, it is hereby found that: (A) for the reasons set forth in paragraph 4 hereof the Tax Increment Financing District is "economic development district" as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 12. (B) The proposed development of the public transit system and improvement of streets which are outlined in the Program and Plan in the opinion of this Council would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and therefor the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. (C) The Tax Increment Financing Plan conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole in that it aids in the development of the property in the Development District in a manner that controls the intensities of land uses, promotes alternatives to travel by automobile and improves streets in the Development District. (D) The Tax Increment Financing Plan will afford maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole for the development of the area included in the Development District by private enterprise in that it assists in alleviating existing and future traffic impacts in the Development District and on adjacent streets by promoting alternatives to travel by automobile and by making improvements to streets in the Development District. (E) The City elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, subdivision 3, clause (a). 6. The City Manager is authorized and directed to request that the appropriate officials of Hennepin County to establish the Tax Increment Financing District for the premises in the City described in the Tax - Increment Financing Plan. I Passed by the Council this 9th day of January, 1989. Attest: City Clerk -2- Mayor The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, and was signed by the Mayor, whose signature was attested by the City Clerk. -3- — . ``�'': ' f - \ � [• yr- ��•: � _. - �^: � _ -- — — r._-�. _ - _ _ - � - __ _ �7 _ — -- _'--- J 77-7 , - FOIRVIE*I Lf 1'� - T - rE• sourNOALV LAKE co 'R -� I • Ti! / W -- I - -4 G K sW rrlw .RO ..�, I--r -� L, Hti - t c w �E T SOU TMbAIE [? _ al _� f '. � / "�� -• I !F ;I ��� � SrORYtMG CE MTER - I I I DTJ .1 -\ Rn RES .�e...• l I _ PARK r 1 : CORwf II• � I ' PARS \`I-} L •, TOFU TOWN iL Rw raw kj- LAKE EDINA - ,NORMANOALE T GOLF � COURSE RK EXHIBIT A DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 _ - -- - wa.57 or ES9U4 APO FA y� LIKE 7 - -�, CG0.tc.'� PAI CO O N E t:/A� 1 '• 1� 1,� EXHIBIT C TAX INCREMENT FINANC SOU r~D• ' UJ t V H - - L 3 ' I •wuC C. - VOPXTPWPd TO Owft PARK � I kmil �-• - - - G DISTRICT NO. 864 i 19 II -u DRAFT NO. 3 Dated 1/4/89 DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 and TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 89 -1 January 9, 1989 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TABLE OF CONTENTS This Table of Contents is for convenience of reference only and is not part of the Development Program or the Tax Increment Financing Plan. Page I. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 A. Statement of Need and Statutory Authority . . . . 1 B. Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II. DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A. Statement of Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . B. Property To Be Included in Development District . . . . . . . . . . . . . C. Development Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D. Environmental Controls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E. Land Use Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . F. Open Space To Be Created . . . . . . . . . . . G. Operation of Development District . . . . . . . . H. Reuse of Private Property . . . . . . . . . . . . I. Property Acquisition, Site Preparation, Relocation and Land Disposition . . . . . . . . 0 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 III. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 89 -1 . . . . . . 6 A. Statement of Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 B. Development Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 C. Property To Be Included in Tax Increment District. 6 D. Estimated Capital and Administration Costs 6 E. Payment of Capital and Administrative Costs 7 F. Determination and Use of Tax Increment . . . . . . 8 G. Impact of Tax Increment Financing on Other Taxing Jurisdictions . . . . . . . . . . 10 IV. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAM AND PLAN . . . . . . . . 10 V. AMENDMENTS TO PROGRAM AND PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 EXHIBITS A. Map of Development District No. 1 B. Legal Description of Development District No. 1 C. Map of Tax Increment Financing District No. 89 -1 D. Legal Description of Tax Increment Financing District No. 89 -1 E. Description of Anticipated Private Development F. Description of Public Transit System G. Estimated Tax Increment I. INTRODUCTION A. Statement of Need and Statutory Authority. The area in City of Edina located south of Highway 62 and east of France Avenue South is currently suffering from traffic congestion, and it is expected that because of the development which the City anticipates will occur in this area, such problems will increase in the future. The City Council has determined that in order to alleviate the traffic congestion in this area and on adjacent streets and to otherwise assure development of this area occurs in an orderly manner consistent with the goals of the City it is necessary to include this area in a Development District to be designated as Development District No. 1 and to take certain action pursuant to a Development Program (the "Program "). In order to finance the capital and administration costs of the Program, it is proposed that the City adopt a tax increment financing plan (the "Plan "), which provides for the creation of Tax Increment Financing District No. 89 -1 (the "District "). The Program and the Plan are adopted by the City Council of the City pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047 and 469.174 to 469.179. B. Definitions. Each of the words and terms defined in this Section shall for all purposes of the Program and the Plan, have the meanings given to them in this Section B: "Anticipated Private Development" means the anticipated private development to occur. in the Tax Increment District as more fully described in Exhibit E hereto. "Bonds" means the tax increment bonds and any other obligations issued by the City, the principal of and interest on which are payable in whole or in part out of the Tax Increment, to finance or provide for the payment of the Capital and Administrative Cost. "Bond Resolution" means any and all resolutions, ordinances, trust indentures or other documents under which any Bonds are sold, issued or secured. "Capital and Administrative Costs" means the total amount expended and to be expended by the City on Development Activities as provided in this Plan. "Captured Tax Capacity" means that portion of the Tax Capacity in excess of the Original .Tax Capacity as adjusted from time to time, if any. "City" means the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota. "Development Activities" means all actions taken or to be taken by the City or HRA in establishing, implementing and carrying out the Program. "Development District" means Development District No. 1 of the City as established pursuant to this Program. "HRA" means the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota. "Original Tax Capacity" means the Tax Capacity of all taxable property in the Tax Increment District as most recently determined by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota as of the date of certification thereof by the County Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177 and as thereafter adjusted and certified by the County Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177. "Outstanding" when used with respect to the Bonds, means Bonds which have not been paid, redeemed or discharged in accordance with their terms or the terms of a Bond Resolution. "Parcel" means a lot, parcel or tract of plat of land comprising a single unit for purposes of assessment for real estate tax purposes, as of the date of adoption of this Plan. "Plan" means the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Tax Increment District as approved and as supplemented and amended from time to time by the City Council of the City. "Public Transit System" means the proposed public transit system to be operated in the Development District as more fully described in Exhibit F hereto. "Program" means this Development Program as supplemented and amended from time to time by the City Council of the City. "Tax Capacity" means the tax capacity of all taxable property in the District as determined from time to time pursuant to state law. "Tax Capacity Rate" means with respect to taxes payable in any year the lesser of (i) the local taxing district tax capacity rates for taxes payable in such year or (ii) the "original tax capacity rate" as defined and calculated in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subdivision la. -2- "Tax Increment" means that portion of the ad valorem taxes generated by the extension of the Tax Capacity Rate to the Captured Tax Capacity of taxable property in.the Tax Increment District. "Tax Increment Bonds" means the approximately $9,400,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, to be issued by the City in one or more series to finance all or a portion of the Capital and Administrative Costs. "Tax Increment District" means Tax Increment Financing District No. 89 -1 of the City. -3- II. DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 A. Statement of Objectives. The objectives sought to be accomplished by the City in establishing and carrying out the Development Activities and in financing the Capital and Administrative Costs, as specified herein, are to meet the needs specified in Section A of the Introduction: a. by promoting and securing the prompt development of the property in the Development District in a manner consistent with applicable governmental comprehensive plans and with a minimal adverse impact on the environment, some of which property is not now in productive use; b. by controlling the intensities of land uses to alleviate existing and future traffic impacts in the Development District and on adjacent streets; C. by promoting alternatives to travel by automobile in order to alleviate congestion and the volume of traffic in the Development District and on adjacent streets; d. by improving West 69th Street, West 66th Street, York Avenue South and France Avenue South in the Development District; e. by securing the increase of property subject to taxation by the City, Hennepin County, Independent School District No. 280, Independent School District No. 273 and other local governmental taxing jurisdictions in order to better enable such entities to pay for public improvements and governmental services and programs required to be provided by them; and f. by undertaking and providing moneys for the payment of the cost of Development Activities in or adjacent to the Development District which are necessary to serve the Development District and for the orderly and beneficial development of the,Development District. B. Property To Be Included in.Development District. The property located in the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, the legal description of which appears on Exhibit B hereto, shall constitute the Development District. C. Development Activities. The Development Activities include the following: 1. By the City, (1) the making of studies and planning and informational activities relating to the Development District; (2) the acquisition of right of way for the Public Transit System to operate in the Development District and the acquisition of equipment for the Public Transit System; (3) the acquisition right -of -way and improvement of public streets which are in the Development District or are adjacent to the Development District; (4) the issuance of the Tax Increment Bonds to finance the Capital and Administrative Costs; and (5) the use of the Tax Increment to pay the debt service on the Tax Increment Bonds or otherwise pay the Capital and Administrative Costs. D. Environmental Controls. The Development Activities do not pose any environmental problems. No environmental - controls, in addition to existing laws and regulations, are contemplated. E. Land Use Considerations. The property in the Development District is currently zoned for its expected use. F. Open Space To Be Created. No additional open space will be created in the Development District pursuant to this Program. G. Operation of Development District. Unless otherwise directed by the City, the maintenance and operation of the public improvements constructed in the District will be the responsibility of the HRA, as administrator of the District. Each year the HRA will submit to the City Council the maintenance and operation budget for the Development District for the following year. The HRA will administer the Development District pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.131; provided, however, that the HRA may exercise the powers listed in said Section 469.131 only at the direction of the City Council. H. Reuse of Private Property. The primary objective of this Development Program is to encourage and assist the improvement and development of property within the Development District and to alleviate the volume and congestion of traffic in the Development District and on adjacent streets. While it is not expected that the City will acquire property other than for the Public Transit System or other public improvements, to the extent that the City acquires property other than for the Public Transit System or other public improvements, it is the City's intent to assist in the development of such property only as necessary to expedite the eventual development of said property by private individuals or companies. -5- I. Property Acquisition, Site Preparation, Relocation and Land Disposition. It is intended that the only property to be acquired is the right of way necessary for the operation of the Public Transit System which is not already owned by the City and the right -of -way necessary to improve the streets in the Development District. The right -of -way acquired for operation of the Public Transit System will be graded and paved for the operation of the Public Transit System and no relocation is expected to occur as a result of any such acquisition. III. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 89 -1 A. Statement of Obiectives. See Section A of the Development Program. B. Development Program. See Sections C through I of the Development Program. C. Property To Be Included in Tax Increment District. The property located in the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota the legal description of which appears on Exhibit C shall constitute the Tax Increment District. D. Estimated Capital and Administration Costs. 1. Estimated Costs Right of Way Acquisition . . . . . . . $ 50,000 Equipment for Public Transit System . . 450,000 Transit Way Improvements . . . . . . . 1,100,000 Public Street Improvements . . . . . . 5,800,000 Capitalized Interest . . . . . . . 1,500,000 (net of investment income) Administrative Costs* . . . . . . . . . 500,000 (including City Administrative, Financial Consultant, Bond Counsel, and other Costs of Issuance of Bonds (including discount)) Total Costs . . . . . . . . . . . $9,400,000 The elements and the costs of the Development Activities shown above are estimated to be necessary based upon the information now available. It is anticipated that the elements and the costs of the Development Activities shown -above may decrease or increase, but that the total Project Costs will not exceed the amount shown above. The City reserves the right to pay the cost of any element of the Capital and Administrative Costs from the proceeds of the Tax Increment Bonds or directly from Tax Increments. ( *The total administrative expense is defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 13 and is estimated to be $500,000, which amount does not exceed 100 of the total tax increment expenditures, which are estimated to be $9,400,000.) -7- 2. Capital Proceeds. The capital proceeds of the project, comprising the proceeds of sale of any land acquired by the City to private developers, are expected to be $0.00. 3. Capital and Administration Costs. The Capital and Administration Costs of the Development District, comprising the total costs expected to be incurred in carrying out the Development Activities by the City is expected to be $9,400,000, plus interest to be paid on the Tax Increment Bonds during their term (other than interest paid from the proceeds of the Tax Increment Bonds). E. Payment of Capital and Administrative Costs. 1. In General. All Capital and Administrative Costs will be paid from Tax Increment either directly.or indirectly by payment of debt service on Tax Increment Bonds issued to finance such cost or reimbursement for items of Capital and Administrative Costs paid directly by the City. 2. Issuance of Bonds. It is presently expected that all or a portion of the Capital and Administrative Costs will be financed by the issuance of the Tax Increment Bonds. The Tax Increment Bonds will be issued by the City under authority of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, and Sections 469.174 to 469.179. The principal amount of the Bonds is expected to be $9,400,000. The actual principal amount of the Bonds, however, may be less than or exceed this amount, and the right to issue the Bonds in an amount greater than $9,400,000 to finance such Capital and Administrative Costs is reserved. Similarly, the amount allocated to capitalized interest covers interest payable on the Bonds (net of investment income on proceeds of the Bonds) at an initial rate now estimated to be approximately 8% per annum for a 18 -month period; and the City reserves the right to increase or decrease the amount of capitalized interest to correspond to the interest actually payable on the Bonds over the 18 -month period. 3. Security For Bonds. The Bonds will be general obligations of the City, and the City will pledge its full faith, credit and unlimited taxing powers to the payment of principal thereof and interest thereon. The principal of and interest on the Bonds are payable primarily, however, from the Tax Increments and no ad valorem tax is expected to be levied for payment of the Bonds and interest thereon in the Bond Resolution. All Tax Increments will be pledged and appropriated to the payment of the Bonds and the interest thereon when due. In addition, such principal and interest will be paid from certain proceeds of the Bonds (capitalized interest) and interest earnings thereon. we 4. Bond Terms. The terms of the Tax Increment Bonds are expected to be as set forth below; however, the right is reserved to adjust any and all terms of the Tax Increment Bonds to secure the best interest rate obtainable and to insure that the entire principal of and interest on the Tax Increment Bonds will be paid when due from the sources specified in paragraph 3. The Tax Increment Bonds will be issued in one or more series, in the aggregate principal amount of $9,400,000, will mature serially over a period of approximately eight (8) years from the date of receipt by the City of the first Tax Increment from the Tax Increment District will be subject to redemption prior to maturity, will bear a fixed rate or rates of interest from date of issue to maturity, payable semiannually commencing approximately six months after the issuance thereof, and will be sold at public or private sale. F. Determination and Use of Tax Increment. 1. Statutory Authority and District Eligibility as an Economic Development District. Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 12 defines an "economic development district" as a tax increment financing district consisting of a portion of a development district which the authority finds to be in the public interest because it will discourage commerce, industry or manufacturing from moving their operations to another state, will result in increased employment in the municipality or will result in preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the municipality. The City believes the Tax Increment District is an "economic development district" since the Development Activities will result in increased employment in the City and the preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the City. 2. Original Tax Capacity. The Tax Capacity of all taxable property in the Tax Increment District as most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota, being the certification made in 1988 with respect to the Tax Capacity of such property as of January 2, 1988, is $6,083,753, which amount is expected to be the Original Tax Capacity of the Tax Increment District, subject to adjustment of 9.25% per year pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subdivision 1, based on the average percentage increase in the assessed valuation of property in the Tax Increment District during the last five years. The Fairview Southdale Hospital campus is included in the Tax Increment District. Such property is presently tax - exempt. The property which the medical office building will be located is expected to be leased or sold to a private partnership or corporation which will construct and own the medical office building. Upon ='1a such transfer or sale, such property will become taxable and the Original Tax Capacity will be increased as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, subdivision 1, with respect to tax - exempt proeprty becoming taxable. 3. Current Tax Capacity. The current Tax Capacity of property in the Tax Increment District is $6,083,753, the Original Tax Capacity. 4. Captured Tax Capacity. It is expected that the Captured Tax Capacity of all taxable property in the District, upon completion of the Anticipated Private Developments (taxes payable 1993) in the District, will be $2,851,215, computed as follows: Estimated Tax Capacity . . . . . . $11,517,987 at Completion Less Original Tax Capacity . . . . 8,666,772 at Completion Estimated Captured Tax . . . . . . Capacity at Completion $2,851,215 5. Tax Increment Calculation. Assuming the Anticipated Private Developments occur as described and provided in Exhibits E and G hereto it is estimated that the Tax Increment to be received each year for the duration of the Tax Increment District will be as set forth in Exhibit G hereto. The estimated amount of Tax Increment set forth in Exhibit G is based upon a Tax Capacity Rate of .88. 6. Duration of the Tax Increment District. It is estimated that the Tax Increment District will remain in existence until the 8 years from the date of receipt of the first Tax Increment or 10 years from the date of approval of this Plan, whichever is earlier, or until the City's obligation to pay the Tax Increment Bonds and interest has been discharged in accordance with the Bond Resolution. 7. Use of Captured Tax Capacity and Tax Increment. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subdivision 2, the City hereby determines that it will use.100% of the Captured Tax Capacity of property located in the Tax Increment District, and 100% of the Tax Increments to be derived therefrom, for the entire duration of the Tax Increment District. 8. from the Tax debt service Excess Tax Increment on the Tax Increment. The Tax Increment received District in any year not needed to pay Increment Bonds coming due on or before -10- August l'of the following year, shall be used first to reduce any ad valorem property tax levied pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, Subdivision 3, and then shall be used to prepay or discharge outstanding Tax Increment Bonds or pay additional Capital and Administration Costs, all in accordance with the Bond Resolution. G. Impact of Tax Increment Financing on Other Taxing Jurisdictions. The local government ur are authorized by law to levy ac which the Tax Increment District School District No. 280, Indeper Hennepin County, the HRA, and va authorities, including the Metrc Metropolitan Transit Commission, Commission and the Metropolitan local government units). - its other than the City which valorem property taxes and in is located, are Independent dent School District No. 273 rious metropolitan area politan Council., the the Metropolitan Airports Mosquito Control District (the The taxing jurisdictions encompassing the District will continue to receive taxes as if the Original Tax Capacity of the Tax Increment District were unchanged, except for the increase in Original Tax Capacity described in Part G(2) of this Plan. This precludes the jurisdictions from benefiting from a portion of the increase in Tax Capacity which results from the Anticipated Private Development Activities or other development of the taxable property in the District. In order to assess the impact of this on Hennepin County, Independent School District No. 280, Independent School District No. 273 and the City the following table indicates what percentage the anticipated Captured Tax Capacity of the Tax Increment District at the completion of the Anticipated Private Development (which occurs for taxes payable in 1993 as shown on Exhibit G hereto), is of the present total Tax Capacity for such taxing jurisdiction. Taxing Jurisdiction Hennepin County, I.S.D. No. 280 Im Extimated Captured Tax Capacity at Completion Present of Percent of Total Anticipated Present Tax Private Total Tax Capacity Development Capacity_ $1,1171564,074 $2,851,215 0.25% 37,373,999 769,828 1.05% Im I.S.D. No. 273 73,099,465 2,081,387 5.56% City of Edina 88,475,862 .2,851,215 3.220 If the District were not created and the Anticipated Private Development occurs all of the Captured Tax Capacity of the Tax Increment District would be available to the taxing jurisdictions, which would result in an increase in the tax capacity of such taxing jurisdictions in each year during the duration of the District in an amount equal to the Captured Tax Capacity. IV. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAM AMENDMENT AND PLAN The Program and the Plan shall be implemented on behalf of the City by the City Council and the HRA as administrator of the Program. The City shall sell and issue Tax Increment Bonds in the amounts needed to finance the Capital and Administrative Costs, less any portion thereof to be paid directly from Tax Increment and shall use so much of the proceeds of the Tax Increment Bonds available and Tax Increment derived from the Tax Increment District to pay such Capital and Administrative Costs as is necessary. V. AMENDMENTS TO PROGRAM AND PLAN The City reserves the right to amend the Program and the Plan, subject to the provisions of state law regulating such action. The City specifically reserves the right to enlarge the geographic area included in the Tax Increment District, to increase the Capital and Administrative Costs and the principal amount of Bonds to be issued to finance such Capital and Administrative Costs, by following the procedures specified in Section 469.175, Subdivision 4, if and when it is determined to be necessary for the payment of additional Capital and Administrative Costs. This Program and this Tax Increment Financing Plan were adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota on the day of , 1989. Mayor City Manager -12- FG.RV.ay — . I • _ '•Y '`- -31mr . '�aw. rtP 60u rN0 LACE �� E• w - = -•I .cua i � NO PTA1. _ - se�rr�Yt, pool'•\ _- - -"- A 77 SOUTkOALE Ir 1 `•3 =•,� -- 1, I I', $MOPPING CEY'CR 1Q• 77 EJ To . PARK "l ...PARR. ••�` h - -y .. TpRN 7OWY ..— ar�nw -- l •• �j L � �� ` _LLj� �C" ,, .,� `� J— Tom\\ t, •la`. r--r - "1i r---, 1--^- _�� � -- roP1R PARK \ •— ,:�';f � f� —,�- /, . .. � � � -- • EOIN4 i /', •' NORI1d 1NOplE �•��. �r ----_- - -- \` GOLF COURSE', �---�� � ! �•.`� ���� III 1 EXHIBIT A � 77-:7 DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 �� = EXHIBIT B LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. I That part of the City of Edina, Hennepin County described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the East corporate boundary of the City of Edina and the South Right Of Way line of County Road No. 62, thence Westerly along said South Right Of Way line of County Road No. 62 to the Westerly Right Of Way line of Valley View Road, thence Southerly and Easterly along the Westerly Right Of Way line of Valley View Road to the Westerly Right Of Way line of France Avenue, thence Southerly along the West Right Of Way line of France Avenue to the corporate boundary of the City of Edina, thence Easterly along the South corporate boundary of the City of Edina to the East corporate boundary of the City of Edina, thence Northerly along the east corporate boundary of the City of Edina to the point of beginning and there terminating. a m 7 71 t 4JPFMRV IF C4 tc� S All K L - , I �- -, K E A, �'-Rn NO PI I AL )D SOI` 0 L "I ................................... --Jj- 7; t L'Ll I w M :. 7S, — L—T- -7 1 Ap%�SON ACRES `JT' 00 ARK COQ.E,-A ...D1 L[ T� -T PARK L�m comb LAK6 EDINA ORNANDALE GOLF COURSE EE.1 -� EXHIBIT C - :7 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 86eg- EXHIBIT D LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 88 -2 GALLERIA Tracts A, C & D. Registered Land Survey No. 1171; Files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County. Minnesota; Tracts A & B. Registered Land Survey No. 1366; Files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota; Tract A. Registered Land Survey No. 1466; Files Files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota; SOUTHDALE Tracts A, B & C, Registered Land Survey No, 1455; Files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota; Tracts B, Registered Land Survey No. 432; Files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota; Tracts G & H. Registered Land Survey No. 629: Files of the Registrar of Titles. Hennepin County, Minnesota; Tracts A & C. Registered Land Survey No. 1284; Files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, ?Minnesota; FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE HOSPITAL That part of Lots 2 and 3, Cassin's Outlots, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying northerly of West 65th Street, southerly of County Road No. 62, westerly of the west line of Lot 1, Block 1, SOUTHDALE ACRES, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hemlepin County, Minnesota, and easterly of France _venue South. EXHIBIT E DESCRIPTION OF ANTICIPATED PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT A. Expansion of Soutlidale Shopping Center including the addition of a new department store and the conversion of existing department store space to multi- tenant retailing. Existing Center Net New Building area New Center Area 1.161,316 sq. ft. 158.000 sq. ft. 1,319,316 sq. ft. B. Expansion and renovation of Galleria Shopping Center, including the demolition of an existing cinema, bowling alley and retail specialty shops and the addition of new specialty retailing, department store and mall area. Existing Center 237.000 sq. ft (less building to be demolished) New Specialty Retail 81,000 sq. ft. Store Addition 35,000 sq. ft. Department Store & Music Store 120,000 sq. ft. Office 13,600 sq. ft. New Center area 486,600 sq. ft. C. Construction of new medical office building on Fairview Southdale Hospital campus. `ledicai Office sq. ft. EXHIBIT F DESCRIPTION OF PUBLIC TRANSIT SYSTEM The City of Edina proposes to establish and operate a transit system that would link employment, retail and residential uses from Edinborough on the south to Fairview Suutlidale on the north. OBJECTIVES OF SYSTEM o To serve shopping trips between retail and employment centers. o To provide service between residences and retail centers /medical services. o To provide service to seniors in the area. u To coordinate the proposed service with existing MTC service. OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES It is anticipated that no -fare service would be provided, with short headways (10 to 20 minutes between buses). Service would be provided every day with twelve -hour service oII weekdays ..«►d shorter service hours oil Saturdays and Sundays. Occasional route diversions to specific sites are possible. The system would use small buses, serving 20 to 25 passengers, with amenities such as easy access. custom interiors, and air conditioning. ROUTING For purposes of the feasibility decision, a route has been established which cuiuie(:ts Edivtburough with Southdale along Lhe right -uf -way which has been reserved between France avenue and Yut1: avenue. The route utilizes the prupused pedestrian way through the Hedberg property, the existing walkway between Yorktown and Byerly's and between Target and Brandon Square, and the parking lot east of the Galleria. The route also extends through the residential area north of 66th Street and to Fairview Southdale Hospital and Southdale Medical Center on France Avenue. The leugtli of this trip would be 3.3 Miley one -way or 6.6 miles round -trip. The buses would stop ai►ywhere along the ruute to pick -up and drop -off passengers, but four L:; five bus shelLers would be provided at major stops. The vehicles in the proposed s)stew area are expected to operate at all average speed of Le►► wiles per hour. This was Lases o►1 actual drive time for future transitway locations. The actual- time was increased by one -third to allow Lillie for passei►ger pick -up and drop -off and fur anticipated increases in intersection delay. TAX TAX EXHIBIT G INCREMENT COMPLETED ORIGINAL ADJUSTED CAPTURED YEAR TAY CAPACITY TAX CAPACITY TAX CAPACITY 1988 -1989 6,083,753 6,083,753 -0- 1989 -1990 6,646,500 6,646,500 -0- 1990 -1991 9.039,345 7,261,301 1,778,044 1991 -1992 10,315,980 7,932,972 2,383,008 1992 -1993 11,517,987 8,666,772 2,851,215 1993 -1994 12,583,401 9,468,448 3,114,953 1994 -1995 13,747,366 10,344,280 3,403,086 1995 -1996 15,018,997 11,301,125 3,717,872 1996 -1997 16,408,254 12,346,479 4,061,775 1997 -1998 17,926,018 13,488,529 4,437,489 TAX TAX CAPACITY RATE INCREMENT .88 -0- .88 -0- .88 1,564.679 .88 2,097,047 .88 2,509,069 .88 2.741,159 .88 2,994.716 .88 3,271,727 .88 3,574,362 .88 3,904.990 9 Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 89 -1 MAKING FINDINGS AND REQUESTING CERTIFICATION OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 89 -1 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. On January 9, 1989, this Council held a public hearing on the designation of Development District No. 1 (the "Development District ") and the adoption of the Development Program for Development District No. 1 (the "Program ") and on the adoption for Tax Increment Financing District 89 -1 (the "Tax Increment Financing Plan "), which establishes Tax Increment Financing District 89 -1 (the "Tax Increment District "), after notice of public hearing was published in the official newspaper of the City not less than 10 days prior to the date of the hearing. The City has consulted with its planning department on the designation of the Development District. All persons desiring to be heard at the hearing were given an opportunity to express their views. 2. Copies of the Program and the Tax Increment Financing Plan have been presented to this Council and are ordered placed on file with the City Clerk. The forms of the Program and Tax Increment Financing Plan are hereby approved and are incorporated herein by reference. 3. The Program and Tax Increment Financing Plan and the designation of the Development District and establishment of the Tax Increment Financing District are hereby approved. 4. It is hereby found that the Tax Increment District is a "Economic Development District," as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 12, in that the development anticipated to occur in the Tax Increment District will result in increased employment in the City and the preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the City. 5. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision 3, it is hereby found that: (A) for the reasons set forth in paragraph 4 hereof the Tax Increment Financing District is "economic development district" as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 12. (B) The proposed development of the public transit system and improvement of streets which are outlined in the Program and Plan in the opinion of this Council would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and therefor the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. (C) The Tax Increment Financing Plan conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole in that it aids in the development of the property in the Development District in a manner that controls the intensities of land uses, promotes alternatives to travel by automobile and improves streets in the Development District. (D) The Tax Increment Financing Plan will afford maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole for the development• of the area included in the Development'District by private enterprise in that it assists in alleviating existing and future traffic impacts in the Development District and on adjacent streets by promoting alternatives to travel by automobile and by making improvements to streets in the Development District. (E) The City elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, subdivision 3, clause (a). 6. The City Manager is authorized and directed to request that the appropriate officials of Hennepin County to establish the Tax Increment Financing District for the premises in the City described in the Tax Increment Financing Plan. 1989. Passed by the Council this 9th day of January, Attest: City Clerk -2- Mayor .IN - The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member Rice and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards and the following voted against the same: None Abstained:' Kelly whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted,' and was signed by the Mayor, whose signature was attested by the City Clerk. -3- LOCATION IV. A. MAP Consent 110 PATTa CT K � �r _ Jay � '�� V • , Y t L O T - NUMBER L O C A T 10 N 6616 Kenney -Place 5109 West 66th Street EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON JANUARY 4, 1989, AT 7:30 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Gordon Johnson, John Bailey, Lee Johnson, Helen McClelland, Del Johnson, Virginia Shaw, Geoff Vorkinger MEMBERS ABSENT William Lewis, John Palmer, David Runyan STAFF PRESENT: Craig Larsen, City Planner Jackie Hoogenakker, Secretary I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Commissioner Shaw moved for approval of the November 30, 1988 Community Development and Planning Commission Minutes. Commissioner Workinger seconded the motion. All voted aye. Motion carried. LD -89 -1 6616 Kenney Place and 5109 West 66th Street, Lang and Baumgartner Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the subject request would transfer a small triangular portion of parcel B and attach it to parcel A. This is necessary due to the encroachment of an existing pool on parcel A. The home on parcel B is located near 66th Street and would not be affected by this lot division. Mr. Larsen concluded the proposed lot division would make both properties conform to setback requirements, therefore, staff recommends approval. Commissioner McClelland moved.to recommend approval of the requested lot division. Commissioner L. Johnson seconded the motion. All voted aye. Motion carried. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 4, 1989 LD -89 -1 6616 Kenney Place and 5109 West 66th Street, Lang and Baumgartner The subject request would transfer a small triangular portion of parcel B and attach it to parcel A. This is necessary due to the encroachment of an existing pool on parcel A. The home on parcel B is located near 66th Street and would not be affected by this lot division. Recommendation The proposed lot division would make both properties conform to setback requirements. Staff recommends approval. L000rn�l �f 3 —�� 7-Ac l],1/ 9 line o>C Zva—� Lod 3-\ � 1 � TN ST2EE T ` WEST (off mplay 0E5(t1fT11)n1S Par I&- I �1 c Lots 5 and 6. Block 1, KENNEY ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County Minnesota.,and that part of Government Lot 3 in Section 4, Township 116, Range 22. Hennepin County Minnesota described as follows: Commencing al a point 30 feel south of the North line and 1067 feet west of the East line of said Government Lot 3 in Section 4; thence south, parallel with the East line at said Government Lot 3, a distance of 290.00 feel to the actual point of beginning of the parcel of land to be described; thence continuing south along the last described line a distance of 160.00 feel; thence east, parallel with the North line of said Government Lot 3, a distance of 60.00 feet: thence northwesterly 10 a point on a line parallel with said North line of Government Lot 3 distant 10.00 feel east from said point of beginning; thence west. along said parallel line, a distance of 10.00 feel to the point of beginning. P r °I That part of the following described property: That part of Government Lot 3, in Section 4, Township 116. Range 21, described as follows: Beginning at a point 30 feel south of the North line and 867 feet west of the East line of said Government Lot 3 in Section 4; thence west parallel with the North line of said Lot 3, a distance of 200 feet; thence south parallel with the East line of said Lot a distance of 550 feel; thence east parallel with the North line of said Lot 3 a distance of 200 feel; thence north parallel with the East line of said Lot a distance of 550 feel to the point of beginning; according to the United States Government Survey thereof. Fxreot that part of the above described properly described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of the above described property; thence south, parallel with the East line at said Government Lot 3, a distance of 290.00 feet to the actual point of beginning of the parcel of land to be described; thence continuing south along the last described line a distance of 160.00 feet; thence east, parallel with the North line of said Government Lot 3, a distance of 60.00 feet; thence northwesterly to a point on a line parallel with said North line of Government Lot 3 distant 10.00 feel east from said point of beginning; thence west, along said parallel line, a distance of 10.00 feel to the point of beginning. 4 a� 1 n � '- 5 W-;s I S4. W iD. Co - .. KEN ti EY r ' i J'z c5 PUCE- i •- - -- r -•- 200.00 - - � 00. S c � C a o3 v l° Xa v O V ,1 �v O I0 N / 'I Ioy,�9U S.P 3 N N 0 r � r IO.aO FLA R.e Sp.00 1 PA O , g�J" f sae. 1 J n „� - -27500 l // EDGE D! Teees 1 QQ£aCOF L11v11J lco.a o - Sa9° SS'sv' w PO AID j 1 i 0 V 'C ,n Q rn Q 41 O d � I � t I 3 t 0 O 0 a 0 V 4 O w v t Q r � 00. S c � C a o3 v l° Xa v WT V �v tiN 1 i 0 V 'C ,n Q rn Q 41 O d � I � t I 3 t 0 O 0 a 0 V 4 O w v t Q TO: CITY COUNCIL REQUEST FOR PURCHASE FROM: CRIAG SWANSON CHIEF OF POLICE VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SI.QJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 DATE: 01 -05 -89 AGENDA.ITEM VI.A ITEM DESCRIPTION: ANNUAL SERVICE CONTRACT FOR EMERGENCY Company COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM Amount of Quote or Ed �. MOTOROLA SERVICE CENTER, MINNETONKA 7,140.00 2. MOTOROLA TWIN CITY SERVICE CENTER, ST PAUL 2. 7,848.00 3. 3. 4. 4. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: MOTOROLA SERVICE CENTER, MINNETONKA GENERAL INFORMATION: THE WARRANTY- PERIOD ON THE EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM HAS EXPIRED.,. THE SERVICE CONTRACT IS EXPECTED TO BE MORE COST EFFECTIVE THAN PAYING FOR REPAIRS AND SERVICE CHECKS ON A TIME & MATERIALS BASIS. S Signature The Recommended bid is Xx within budget not POLICE Department Manager December 16, 1988 City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Bernhjelm, We at Motorola value your business and would like the chance to serve you. Your recently purchased equipment -will soon be out of warranty and we feel that the best value in service would be a Motorola Service Agreement. For a small monthly charge, Motorola will offer the following benefits. 1. NO CHARGE FOR PARTS, LABOR AND MILEAGE. No charge for parts labor and mileage no matter how expensive the part or how many trips it takes to fix the problem. 2. PRIORITY SERVICE & FASTER TURNAROUND You will experience less down time and receive service before time and material customers. 3. BUDGETABLE EXPENSE You will know exactly how much you will spend each year on radio maintenance so you can budget for it. 4. ENGINEERING STAFF SUPPORT FROM MOTOROLA If a problem occurs within the system that cannot be found, Motorola's engineers will be brought in to get the system operating back to specification. 5. MOTOROLA TRAINED TECHNICIANS The people at the Minnetonka Service Center attend service schools put on by Motorola several times a year to keep them updated on all new equipment and its service needs. 6. PERIODIC INSPECTIONS PREVENTING FUTURE DOWN TIME Two times each year at your request your entire system will be gone through and brought back to Motorola Specifications to insure system performance. 7. $$$ SAVINGS Over a years time a Motorola Service Agreement should save the customer money while keeping that customers system operating at peak performance on a predetermined budget. 01 Motorola Service is designed with the customer's best interest in mind and comes highly recommended by Motorola as well as a majority of our customers. Per your request I have submitted three copies of the key people who would be involved with your project along with a list of references who have had experience with the Minnetonka Service Center in regard to maintaining their Centracom II console systems. I have also enclosed the actual service agreement which will require a signature assuming that the bid is accepted. Once accepted we will provide the City of Edina with a performance bond along with a certificate of insurance. 'If you should have any questions feel free to call me at (612) 941 -3037. Best regards, Terr L. Osland Section Service Representative MOTOROLA Communications & Electronics, Inc. J !_1ZJ FOR A SERVICE AND MAINTENANCE CONTRACT COVERING THE EDINA PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM (Bids must be received by: December 16, 1988 at 4:30 PM) BIDDER NAME Minnetonka Service Center BIDDER ADDRESS 5929 Baker Road Minnetonka. MN 55345 BIDDER PHONE NUMBER (612) 935 -5470 DATE 12 -16 -88 The undersigned has examined the bid requirements and specifications for the above named service contract and hereby proposes to provide said work, in accordance with all requirements set forth by the City of Edina, for the price listed below. BID FOR SERVICE AND MAINTENANCE PER YEAR $ 7,140.00 SIGNATURE �t,, , ; : kxk. TYPED NAME Terry Lin Osland - Section Service Representative (Bid must be submitted on this form only) BID FOR A SERVICE AND MAINTENANCE CONTRACT COVERING THE EDINA PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM (Bids must be received by: December 16, 1988 at 4:30 PM) BIDDER NAME ' -win Cities service center BIDDER ADDRESS 75U Transfer Read, St Paul, MN 55114 BIDDER PHONE NUMBER 612 -646 -1051 DATE De c emb _ � r 15, 1988 The undersigned has examined the bid requirements and specifications for the above named service contract and hereby proposes to provide said work, in accordance with all requirements set forth by the City of Edina, for the price listed below. BID FOR SERVICE AND MAINTENANCE PER YEAR $ 7848.00 SIGNATURE TYPED NAME Dick Halzfe (Bid must be submitted on this form only) R F..gOT .TTT T (1N WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute various separate parcels: Lots 5 and 6, Block 1, KENNEY ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and That part of Government Lot 3, in Section 4, Township 116, Range 21, described as follows: Beginning at a point 30 feet south of the North line and 867 feet west of the East line of said Government Lot 3 in Section 4; thence west parallel with the North line of said Lot 3, a distance of 200 feet; thence south parallel with the East line of said Lot a distance of 550 feet; thence east parallel with the North line of said Lot 3 a distance of 200 feet; thence north parallel with the East line of said Lot a distance of 550 feet to the point of beginning; according to the United States Government Survey thereof, WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to subdivide said tracts into the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ": Lots 5 and 6, Block 1, KENNEY ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and that part of Government Lot 3 in Section 4, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at a point 30 feet south of the North line and 1067 feet west of the east line of said Government Lot 3 in Section 4; thence south, parallel with the East line at said Government Lot 3, a distance of 290.00 feet to the actual point of beginning of the parcel of land to be described; thence continuing south along the last described line a distance of 160.00 feet; thence east, parallel with the North line of said Government Lot 3, a distance of 60.00 feet; thence northwesterly to a point on a line parallel with said North line of Government Lot 3 distant 10.00 feet east from said point of beginning; thence west, along said parallel line, a distance of 10.00 feet to the point of beginning, and That part of the following described property: That part of Government Lot 3, in Section 4, Township 116, Range 21, described as follows: Beginning at a point 30 feet south of the North line and 867 feet west of the East line of said Government Lot 3 in Section 4; thence west parallel with the North line of said Lot 3, a distance of 200 feet; thence south parallel with the East line of said Lot a distance of 550 feet; thence east parallel with the North line of said Lot 3 a distance of 200 feet; thence north parallel with the East line of said Lot a distance of 550 feet to the point of beginning; according to the United States Government Survey thereof, Except that part of the above described property described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of the above described property; thence south, parallel with the East line at said Government Lot 3, a distance of 290.00 feet to the actual point of beginning of the parcel of land to be described; thence continuing south along the last described line a distance of 160.00 feet; thence east, parallel with the North line of said Government Lot 3, a distance of 60.00 feet; thence northwesterly to a point on a line parallel with said North line of Government Lot 3 distant 10.00 feet east from said point of beginning; thence west, along said parallel line, a distance of 10.00 feet to the point of beginning. WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance Nos. 801 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 9, 1989 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 18th day of January, 1989. � gtNA. o e' ch �y • RPOMT�v� ISO$ To :' Ken Ros 1 and From: Janet Chandler Date: January 9, 1989 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION Subject: Report from Recycl ing Commission and staff with recommendations for 1989 program. Recommendation: Agenda Item # .�4 . Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action,. ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Decision on Recycling Hauler (Alternative #1 or #2) and actions needed to implement the program. Info /Background: The enclosed report.is the same as that submitted to Council on December 28 for study and review. In addition, a Background Information page and Ordinance Amendment section (yellow pages) are included. The Edina Garbage Haulers and the prospective Recycling Contractors are expected to be in attendance January 9th. An article in the December 28th issue of the Edina Sun /Current may have focused public attention on this meeting also. RECYCLING REPORT AND PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION In keeping with the Strategic Work Plan adopted by Council in June, the Recycling Commission and Staff offer this report and program recommendations for Council consideration. The Objectives adopted in the Strategic Plan were to: "Provide household pickup of recyclables, at least on a monthly basis, for all single family and two family dwellings, effective April 1, 1989. Accomplish a diversion of 16% of the City's solid waste stream for calendar year 1990." In September, Council adopted a budget which would allow the City to contract fur city -wide recycling pickup service to begin in April, 1989. The next step is approval of the program for 1989. STATUS OF PRESENT RECYCLING PROGRAM MATERIAL 188 PROJECTION 1987 Paper, glass, metal 1,420 1,037 Goodwill 180 163 Compost 2,500 696 TOTAL 4,100 tons 1,896 This is 20.3% residential waste reduction rate for 1988,-versus 9.4% for 1987, based on 20,110 tons of residential waste per year. Adding in Commercial /Industrial recycling, projected at 1,500 tons, the total recycling tonnage for Edina will be about 5,600 tons, a 10% reduction from the total annual waste generation amount of 54,233 tons. This means we should achieve the 1988 Goal of 9% waste reduction. FUNDING & POLICY CHANGES FOR 1989 Under Hennepin County's new recycling policy, cities retain responsibility for residential recycling, and Hennepin County assumes responsibility for commercial /industrial recycling. Also, funding will be based on the amount of paper, glass and cans recycled (compost and Goodwill items excluded) with a 10% reduction goal for 1989. For Edina, this means our 1989 goal is 2.011 tons of paper, glass & cans. In 1988, our paper, glass and cans recycled will total about 1.420 tons - -a 7% residential waste reduction. RECYCLING COMMISSION MEETINGS WITH HAULERS The Recycling Commission met in November with prospective recycling contractors and Edina's residential garbage haulers. Previously, the Commission had thought that trash haulers would favor a plan whereby the City would contract for city -wide recycling pickup, since the haulers would have less work and less tonnage on which to pay a tip fee. However, most trash haulers were not pleased with this proposal. They regard this diversion of material as a lost business opportunity. Also, they are concerned that they might lose customers if a city -wide recycling contractor were to offer combined recycling /garbage pickup. Another factor of concern to the trash haulers is the tip -fee of $75 /ton which will be imposed in June. This has prompted a new look at the economics of collecting recyclables separately. An analysis of recycling collection programs (by Hennepin Co. staff) shows that recyclables can be collected for $30 to $40 a ton. Therefore, the idea of providing a combined recycling /garbage pickup service is being considered by some haulers. The Recycling Commission heard from all five residential garbage haulers, three of whom would like to provide recycling pickup for their present customers. One hauler stated that they would provide this service if the City so dictates. The fifth hauler has serious doubts about being able to provide recycling service due to the initial investment in equipment. Those proposing to pick -up recyclables pointed out that garbage and recycling pickup could be on the same day, which would be very convenient for the residents. Also, competition among haulers would tend'to promote good service all around. RECYCLING PROGRAM ALTERNATIVES We, therefore, find that two recycling program options are now worthy of consideration, namely: 1. City -wide Recycling Contractor 2. Recycling by Trash Haulers (require through licensing procedure) These alternatives are described and compared on the enclosed green pages. It is important to consider how Hetuiepin County funding policy would apply to each program. The County has designated a portion of the $75 /ton tip fee to help fund city recycling programs. Funding will cover collection costs only when there is a contract between the City and the collector. With a garbage hauler recycling program, Edina residents would pay into the $75 1ton tip fee, but not receive the full share of beriefits. (However, funding would be available for all other program costs.) PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION Although the garbage hauler approach has considerable merit and staff feels it may be best in the long run, the majority of the Recycling Commissioners voted to stand by their previous recommendation to contract with one recycles to provide city -wide weekly recycling pickup service. They feel this approach would be more efficient, easier to administer and would offer consistent, reliable service to all residents. U ��rmr or � �EDINA RECYCLING Z� q V r RECYCLING PROGRAM 1. CITY -WIDE CONTRACT, Recycling Pickup for single family homes. Features of program 1. Weekly pickup of paper, glass & cans (cardboard & plastic or other materials at the option of the hauler.) 2. Pickup to be on one day city wide. 3. Contractor to provide city with tonnage and participation data 4. City to provide one recycling container per household. 5. City to promote the program through brochures and news articles. 6. Incentive to recycle: volume based fees for garbage collection 7. Allow (but not require) curbside placement of recyclables. ADVANTAGES: * City would meet recycling goals 70% or 80% county funding for all program costs " Easier to administrate One day weekly city -wide would be easy to remember and promote. The same level of service city wide * One large contractor may be better able to deal with problem markets and thus avoid lapses in pickup service. DISADVANTAGES: • Most residents would not have recycling pickup on the same day as garbage pickup. • Some haulers feel that this system is unfair to them, and will cause them to lose customers. *-This program would be more costly for the city general fund. ACTION NEEDED TO IMPLEMENT THIS PROGRAM 1. Approval of bid process for city -wide recycling contract. 2. Container purchase 3. Ordinance admendments. Ord. #711, to define recyclables Ord. #711, Ito allow curbside placement of recyclables Ord. #1301, to require volume based fees for garbage collection Ord. #1001, anti- scavenging provision ALTERNATIVES 2. RECYCLING PICKUP BY GARBAGE HAULERS FOR THEIR CUSTOMERS (Require through licensing procedure) Features of program 1. Weekly pickup of paper, glass, cans (cardboard, plastic or other materials at the option of the hauler) 2. Recyclables to be picked up the same day as garbage. 3. Haulers to provide the city with tonnage and participation data. 4. City to provide one container per household 5. City to promote the program and work with haulers to develop promotional materials. 6. Hauler to bill customers directly for garbage /recycling /compost pickup service. 7. Require that an economic advantage for recyclers be built into the fee structure for garbage /recycling /compost pickup service. A[ * * * * * * )VANTAGES City would meet recycling goals Same day garbage & recycling pickup is most convenient for resident Greater flexibility in placement or preparation of material Easier for resident to deal with one hauler for all waste materials. Resident can pick his /her own hauler. Competition would tend to promote good recycling service. Less costly for city general fund. DISADVANTAGES * More difficult to administer * All residents may not have equally good service. * Start -up costs or market problems may cause uneven service. * Participation may build up more slowly. * County funding would not be available for haulers' pickup costs. ACTION NEEDED TO IMPLEMENT THIS PROGRAM 1. Container purchase 2. Ordinance amendments Ord. #711, to define recyclables Ord. #1301, to require haulers to pick up recyclables. Ord. #1301, to require a fee structure for garbage /recycling /compost collection that gives an economic benefit to recyclers. • Ord. #1001, anti- scavenging provision BACKGROUND INFORMATION ORDINANCE TO REQUIRE GARBAGE HAULERS TO PICK UP RECYCLABLES Scott County has recently enacted an ordinance requiring that all garbage haulers in the county must provide single family residential recycling pickup service effective January, 1989. After July 1, 1989, this require- ment will be extended to multiple family residences and commercial customers. This approach has also been adopted by the city of Eagan, and is being considered by other cities including Burnsville and Apple Valley. FINANCIAL INCENTIVE FOR RECYCLING, VOLUME BASED FEES FOR GARBAGE COLLECTION, ETC. Included in the Scott County waste disposal ordinance is a provision which requires that the garbage /recycling haulers must provide an economic incentive for their customers to recycle; for example, volume based garbage fees or a recycling credit system. Several cities in our area which have municipal garbage service have volume based fee systems which give a break to the recycler. In Robbinsdale and St. Louis Park; for instance, residents who recycle and separate yard waste pay lower garbage fees than non - recyclers. The city of Plymouth, which has an open hauling system similar to Edina's, has a weekly cash drawing of $500 to the lucky recycler whose address is pulled out of the hat! ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS FOR ALTERNATIVES #1 AND #2 Ord. A 711, Section 1. Definitions, to define recyclables Following the paragraph defining "Refuse," add..... "Recyclables" include, but are not limited to, bundles or bags of newsprint, bundled corrugated paper, glass jars, beverage cans, tin cans or plastic containers prepared for recycling in such manner to be free of food, dirt or other contaminants. Ord. #1001, to add an anti - scavenging section (new sec. 19) Ownership of recyclable materials placed for collection remains with the householder from which the materials originated until collected by the designated collection program. Upon removal by the designated collector, ownership shall be vested with the collector. Materials not prepared, cleaned or stored according to City specifications shall remain the responsibility of the household from which the materials originated. It shall be a misdemeanor for any person other than the designated collector to take or collect recyclables set out for authorized collection. FOR ALTERNATIVE #1 Ord. # 711, Section Add-- - (c) Recyclables may residential properties i) stored within a bag ii) placed at the curb scheduled pickup. 4, Placing of Containers be placed next to the street or curb adjoining for pick -up provided that such recyclables shall be or container designed for such a purpose and no more than twelve (12) hours prior to the Ord. #1301, Add to Sec. 3. Applications Fee structure for garbage /compost pickup shall be designed to give economic incentive to those customers who separate yard waste for compost pickup and have the least amount of garbage. FOR ALTERNATIVE #2 Ord. #1301, New Section 16, (To require haulers to pick up recyclables) Haulers shall collect from customers and segregate from other garbage and refuse, all glass, paper, cans and other materials which have been prepared for recycling as designated in Ord. 711. Recyclables shall be picked up weekly on the same day as garbage service. Haulers shall report to the City Recycling Office by the 15th of each month the amount, by weight, of recyclables collected the previous month. Ord. #1301, Add to Sec. 3. Applications Fee structure for combined garbage, recycling and compost pickup shall be designed to give economic incentive to those customers who recycle and separate yard, waste for composting. A. o e A �, U) H�v �O Con �aea REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To' Mayor and City Council From: Bob Kojetin & John Keprios Date: January 6, 1989 Subject: CITY OF EDINA 1988 -89 WORK PROGRAM Recommendation: Agenda Item # vii B. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion We recommend acceptance of the attached "Proposed Approach to 'City of Edina 1988 -1989 Work Program' Assignment ". Info /Background: In response to the assignment set forth in the "City of Edina 1988 -89 Work Program'', staff members from the Planning Department, Park and Recreation Department, and Administration Department met and established a recommended approach to the assignment. Enclosed is a copy of the original Work Program and minutes from the joint. Council /Park Board meeting held December 13, 1988. r PROPOSED APPROACH TO CITY OF EDINA 1988 -89 WORK PROGRAM ASSIGNMENT I. Review the Park and Recreation Task Force Report A. Identify and prioritize necessary capital improvements B. Review maintenance standards C. Analyze survey results to predict trends in park uses and desired recreation activities D. Analyze survey results to establish long -range fees and charges policies II. Involve the community organizations if desired by the Park Board A. Survey or solicit opinions from the following: 1. Edina Athletic Associations 2. Park and recreation related civic groups such as Edina Garden Club, Historical Society, etc. 3. Edina School District 4. Edina Community Education Department B. Review the impact of other jurisdictions such as County, State, and Federal governments. III. Establish goals and priorities concerning the year 2000 park and recreation system with particular respect to: A. Park and open space acreage 1. Land acquisition 2. Land disposition 3. Adequacy of current park system classification B. Park Development 1. Develop priorities for facility development 2. Completion of original master plan for each park 3. Identify future park facility needs for both programmed active recreation /athletic activities and non - programmed passive recreation /athletic activities. IV. Capital Improvements A. Prepare a five -year capital plan B. Prepare a capital plan for the year 2000 C. Establish a capital infra - structure repair and replacement plan V. Finance A. Based on survey results, establish a long range fee and charges policy, including renting /leasing parklands and facilities B. Identify future of alternate funding sources VI. Recreation Programming Future Needs A. Identify future population and demographic predictions B. Identify and classify targeted populations to be served C. Identify recreation opportunities offered within the community by other organizations such as: 1. Private golf courses 2. Community Education programming 3. Health clubs D. Alternative programming opportunities such as: 1. Joint programming.with other municipalities 2. Joint public /private venture programming E. With data from survey and from interactions with other organizations, identify future recreation /athletic needs and desires r 4 ch �0 o. Rrnpu t �tlne REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: _ KENNETH ROSLAND CITY MANAGER From: ROBERT KOJETIN AND GORDON HUGHES Date: DECEMBER 5, 1988 Subject: DECEMBER 13, 1988 COUNCIL /PARK BOARD MEETING Recommendation: Agenda Item # VI.G Consent ❑ Information Only 7x Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA EE To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Info /Background: The Council and .Park Board will meet jointly on December 13, 1988 at 8:00 PM to discuss the issue relating to our future park and recreation needs. Attached is a copy of the relevant part of the 1988 -1989 Work Program which deals with this issue. We suggest the following draft agenda for this meeting: 1. Introduction of Council and Park Board members 2. Overview of Park and Recreation Task Force Report 3. Discuss Elements of the Assignment as contained in the Work Program 4. Review Timetable including advisability of a progress meeting some- time during 1989 We suggest that you briefly review the Park and Recreation Task Force Report prior to the December 13 meetingl. Please advise if you need a new copy of this report. CITY OF EDINA 1988 - 1989 WORK PROGRAM ISSUE #1. In light of the report of the Park and Recreation Task Force, how can Edina's parks, recreational facilities, and programs adapt to meet the future needs of our residents? Goal: Park and Recreation facilities and programs which respond to the changing needs and desires of the community. Focus: As part of the 1987 -88 work program, the Council established a citizen Task Force to assess our park and recreation facilities. park maintenance standards and fees and charges structure. The Task Force provided a "snapshot in time" u£ Edina's parks and facilities and also conducted a public Opinion survey which obtained our resident's attitudes concerning the present park and recreation system. With the findings of the Part: and Recreation 'rusk Force, the City is now in a position to develop a strategy for park acid recreation facilities and programs for the future. Short -Term Objectives: Update the coumiunity facilities element of the Comprehensive \ Plan by adopting a year 2000 Park and Recreation Plan. Work Program: Assign the Park Board the task of undertaking and completing the year 2000 Edina Park and Recreation Plari. Staff services will be provided by the Planning Department and Park and Recreation Department. Elements of the assignment x Review the Park and Recreation Task Force'Report. * Involve the community organizations if desired by the Park Board * Establish goals and priorities concerning the Year 2000 park and recreation system with particular respect to: - Park and open space acreage - Park development - Recreation programming including specialized prograrmuing such as adaptive recreation Review alternatives and develop strategies to address identified goals x Prepare a revised five year capital improvement plan Timetable: September. 1988 - Organizational Meeting - Council & Park Board - January, 1990 - Comprehensive Plan Awiendment EDINA PARK BOARD ,Joint Meeting with City Council 8:00 P.M. December 13, 1988 Edina City Hall MEMBERS PRESENT: Bob Christianson, Don Wineberg, Bill Lord, Itti Furlong, Andrew Montgomery, Bill Jenkins MEMBERS ABSENT: Jim Fee, Jean Rydell, Mac Thayer, Scott Johnson COUNCIL PRESENT: Mayor Courtney, Fred Richards, Glenn Smith, Peggy Kelly, Leslie'Turner STAFF PRESENT: Ken Rosland, Gordon Hughes, Ceil Smith, Marce Daehn, Bob Kojetin, John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Bill Bach, Vince Cockriel, Diana Hedges, Larry Thayer, John Valliere, Sue Weigle, Stacey Kness, Craig Larsen, Joyce Repya OTHERS PRESENT: Jim Van Valkenburg; Roger Harrold, Braemar Golf Association Mayor Courtney called the meeting to order at 8 :10 p.m. I. INTRODUCTION OF COUNCIL AND PARK BOARD MEMBERS II. OVERVIEW OF PARK AND RECREATION TASK FORCE REPORT Mr. Hughes gave an overview of the Task Force Report. The conclusions of the report are as follows: - The parks and facilities meet the needs of the people - Give special attention to unorganized park users - Parks are generally well maintained - Present fee and charges structure is generally well received - Upgrading of pavilion is favored but upgrading of pool and gymnastics facility is not favored III. ELEMENTS OF ASSIGNMENT (See attached Work Program) Mr. Rosland explained the Council wants to hear what the Park Board feels about the year 2000. Mr. Rosland suggested revisiting the open space study, redevelopment within the study, and revisiting the park programming. Mr. Richards asked what can be done to improve the parks. Mr. Jenkins asked if the master plan would come ahead of development of open space. Mr. Kojetin answered each park has a master plan, and in order to do the master plan for each park, we would have to have a bond issue. Mr. Wineberg said as long as we did the study we should focus some attention to that. Mr. Richards asked if we are doing enough. Mr. Wineberg said we are never doing enough. We did spend some money to do a survey. The significant part of the survey is that there is a number of people using the parks who we did not give any attention to. Mr. Christianson stated we should address today but focus on our needs for the year 2000. For instance, Van Valkenburg Park is designated specifically for adult participants and is still not playable. This project was started seven years ago. - 1 - This could be symptomatic of a larger problem. We as a Park Board have not had in -depth discussions or planning sessions on that issue; we deal with more immediate problems. Mrs. Kelly asked if the 80 percent surveyed are satisfied with passive use of parks Mr. Wineberg said we should make sure the parks are maintained for unscheduled use. Mr. Richards pointed out in the strategic planning process we attempt to list the five most important issues to deal with. Single most important issue is the Park Board and facilities. .Mr. Christianson said he is happy to accept charge to take the number one issue and make some recommendations. Mr. Smith asked what does it cost to finish what we have and to what level should we finish. He wants to make sure what we have will be here 20 to 30 years from now. Mr. Christianson said what we have today and what we improve today might not be functional in ten to 20 years. Mrs. Furlong said we need to go to the original park master plans. Mr. Lord said the survey says the aging people of Edina are the people we should be looking at. There seems to be a desire for more passive parks. adult facilities, and development expansion at Braemar Golf Course. Mrs. Furlong said we should look back and see if the master plan is as natural as when it was conceived. Mr. Smith recommended looking at the assets we have and decide which ones to'keep and bring them more ahead to see how much of budget is left for expansion. He welcomes the idea of long range planning. Mr. Montgomery said we are losing revenue capacity. The youth paying the $S field use fee will not be paying it forever. Now we are bringing in facilities that still will not be collecting revenue. Mr. Rosland said maintenance funding for Edinborough and Centennial Lakes comes froL a trust fund. Mr. Richards suggested considering the park system to be the outdoor parks and not the revenue facilities. Mr. Lord said if the survey is accurate, then the residents feel park maintenance is good. It seems we need-to meet the demand of the older citizens. Mr. Richards said we have to keep the mission statement in mind too. Mr. Rosland said balance is important. We don't want to swing too far one way or the other. Mr. Van Valkenburg said the Art Center recommends adding some space for classroom for safety and handicapped access. Mr. Van Valkenburg suggested the Park Board develop a plan and then make some recommendations to the'Council. Park Board's function is to commit to some of these improvements now to be paid off later by those people using them. Mr. Smith suggested implementing the original plans or decide we don't want to and then get on with some other issues. Mr. Van Valkenburg said Park Board should be idealistic and go to the Council with their recommendations and see how much money can be budgeted. 2 - Mr. Richards commented the survey indicates that the park system is okay. The questions is: where do we want to be in ten years and how should we get there. Mr. Smith said the City and the School Board are working together for re- locating the Senior Center. The City has entered a seven -year lease for space at the Edina Community Center. Diana Hedges mentioned the success of the Art Center and their need for more space. Mr. Richards commended Ms. Hedges on the Art Center's success. Mr. Valliere commented if'tax increment monies can be set aside for improvement, the problem of financing improvements would not come up. He wondered if it is possible for the Art Center to have a fund to assist them for improvements. He asked if we are always going to rely on taxes, or are we going to have some contingency funds. Mr. Keprios mentioned the things the Park Department has accomplished: Edinborough Park, the renovated Braemar pavilion, purchase of the golf dome, Arneson Acres, Lewis Park tennis courts, upgrading of several hockey rinks, Bredesen Park construction, our new park foreman, the Special Needs Program, maintenance garage and clubhouse at the golf course, Wooddale Park, upgraded tennis courts, and Centennial Lakes. These projects have been very progressive and successful. It is difficult to explain to residents having to compromise capital dollars. This doesn't mean cleaning or painting but replacing.with new equipment to bring it up to standards. Our new park foreman will help decide what needs to be done. Mr. Thayer suggested making strategic planning our number one priority this year and come up with an overall plan for the year 2000. Mr. Richards asked if the size of the Park Board is adequate. Mr. Christianson responded others will have to be involved whatever we do. Mr. Richards requested a subcommittee of the Park Board be formed before the end of 1989. Mr. Christianson indicated the Park Board could discuss at the January 10 meeting if there are enough people and set up a plan. Then the Park Board could report back to the Council with a framework of where we are going and how we will get there. Mr. Richards suggested this subject be added to the January 9 Council agenda re -write the work program and present it at the Park Board meeting January 10. Meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m. - 3 - 3� a n m c B ewe ,r rN;s M O S _ A vA m a 4 A X K, N QQ � o� v W A N A p m C ?o mo S o 19 A a�i In m N H _ Q v y ^y O n r � 3 3 s o d a = g a: th M o� m 3. CL N N p 7 N � � o efl i About the Government Training Service GTS is a public organization whose mission is to meet the changing management and leadership needs of policymakers, staff and appointed officials by providing innovative, comprehensive, practical training, and consulting to publicly funded organizations in Minnesota. Its members are the League of Minnesota Cities, the Association of Minnesota Counties, the Minnesota Association of Townships, the Minnesota Association of Regional Commissions, the University of Minnesota, the Minnesota Community Colleges, the State Planning Agency, and the State Department of Employee Relations. Government Training Service Presents... • Seminars for Elected Officials Meeting the Municipal Challenge Through Strategic Thinking, Revenue Diversification, and Visible Popular Support The Art of Public Decision Making: Understanding Small Group Dynamics and Other Secrets of Council Behavior Friday, January 27, 1989 Hotel Sofitel Bloomington, Minnesota Meeting the Municipal Challenge Through Strategic Thinking, Revenue Diversification, and Visible Popular Support Friday, January 27 830 a.m.430 p.m. Governance of today's cities does not mean status quo. The nation as a whole is undergoing a major restructuring of many of our social, political, and economic systems —a restructuring guaranteed to have a profound effect on the future of municipalities. New questions about the purpose of local government, appropriate services, ways to implement those services are being asked. It is up to you —as an elected leader— to'think about the answers for your community. Seminar participants will have an unusual opportunity to explore some of the "big picture" considerations and identify possible directions for their own jurisdiction. Discussion will focus on: • changes and challenges affecting the fundamentals of municipal governance and economics • implications of viewing local government as a service organization rather than an enforcement agency • governance/management strategies and standards as a basis for evaluating quality of service and community support • ways in which cities can recognize and respond to the emergence of consumerism as a major force affecting public policy decisions and municipal leadership elections • programs and strategies to help policymakers, employees, and citizens understand the new concept of municipal enterprise as a service -based organization capable of entrepreneurial innovation, service -delivery excellence, revenue diversification, and responsiveness to its customer This thought - providing day will include an opportunity for participants to work in small groups to apply the principles to their own communities. PRESENTER Carl Neu, Executive Vice President, Neu and Company; leadership consultant to government, business, and non -profit sectors; former member and President of Lakewood, Colorado City Council Fee Registration fee is S80. It includes tuition, lunch, breaks, and materials. The Art of Public Decision Making: Understanding Small Group Dynamics and Other Secrets of Council Behavior Friday, January 27 7:00 -9:00 p.m. Sponsored by Women in City Government Working as an effective part of any group can be a tough assignment. Add to that the special issues involved for elected members of governing bodies and effective decision making becomes a significant challenge. Yet the welfare of your constituents (or your entire city) is often at stake. This seminar is designed to explore how group process "really" operates in a public policy setting and provide practical ideas which can be implemented at your next council meeting. Through short presentations, small group discussion and exercises, participants will: • gain an understanding of group dynamics and appropriate behavior at each stage • discover how to deal appropriately with difficult situations such as hidden agendas, personality clashes and special group interests • develop skill in negotiating conflict situations • utilize techniques to prevent destructive aspects of public decision making and polarization • learn myths of decision making, a model for "preventive maintenance of the group," the "Rules of the Game," and common errors of newly elected officials All elected officials and administrative staff are welcome to this evening of awareness building as well as sociability. PRESENTER Barbara Arney, independent consultant, trainer and facilitator who combines a graduate degree in Applied Behavioral Science with extensive local government experience and over 10,000 hours of training for public, private and non -profit organizations; Adjunct Faculty, University of Minnesota Fee Registration fee for this evening program is S20 /person. It includes materials and refreshments. General Information Location Programs will be held at the Hotel Sofitel, 5601 West 78th Street (1 -494 and Highway 100), Bloomington, Minnesota 55435 -3899 (612/835- 3104). Registration Register in advance by completing and returning the form provided in this brochure. Multiple registrations can be made by duplicating the form. Registrations should be received by Friday, January 20, 1989. Cancellation /Refunds Should inclement weather (or other circumstances beyond our control) necessitate program cancellation or postponement, participants will be notified via announcements on WCCO Radio and other local radio stations. Fees will be refunded ONLY if cancellation notification is received by Wednesday, January 25, or if the program is cancelled. Persons pre- registered (but not pre-paid) who do not attend this event will be billed for the entire registration fee. Alternate representatives will be accepted at any time. For Further Information Lisa McMann (for registration assistance) Carol Schoeneck (for program questions) Government Training Service 202 Minnesota Building 46 East Fourth Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 612/222 -7409 or Minnesota toll free 800 /652 -9719 For Further Information T - Unlock the door Cathy Dovidio, League of Minnesota Cities; 612/227 -5600 (for registration - - - to public service...._ assistance) or Carol Schoeneck, Government Training Service; 612/222 -7409 ='4 or Minnesota Toll Free 800 /652 -9719 (for program questions). - .- Cancellation The League must receive notice of intent to cancel your participation seven i HERE'S THE days prior to the program. Substitutions for registered participants are pos- _ KEY sible at any time. Should inclement weather (or other circumstances beyond our control) necessitate program cancellation or postponement, participants - will be notified via announcements on WCCO radio and other local stations., Special Note: League of Minnesota Cities In cooperation with the League of Minnesota Cities, the Government Training - Conference for Service and Women in City Government are presenting pre - conference workshops on Friday, January 27, 1989. See separate brochure included with details. Newly Elected Officials this mailing far _ About the - League of Minnesota Cities. . - LMC is the official cooperative association of cities serving the needs and _ :._ - : - Saturday, January 28, 1989 best interests of the state's municipalities. It represents cities working to- Z. Hotel Sofitel gether to promote legislation on behalf of local government and provides _ _ _ - . Bloomington information and other resources to assist city officials in their efforts to im- prove the quality of service delivery to Minnesota citizens. About the Government Training Service._.. - ` Now that the elections are over, it's time GTS is a public organization whose mission is to meet the changing manage- a �' to take your seat on the council and meet meat and leadership needs of policymakers, staff and appointed officials by providing innovative, comprehensive, practical training and consulting to 1 _ - the growing challenge of governing your city. Recognizing the publicly funded organizations in Minnesota. GTS is providing planning and _ tough job and serious responsibilities confronting you, the .management services for this conference:--- = _ _ - League of Minnesota Cities is offering a one -day Conference - - for Newly Elected Officials. to ease the transition. - - =- -- -- - - - . r- -- - - -- - - -; Should Attend - Who_Shou en d _ The conference is primarily for newly elected mayors and council mem bers; however, any incumbent elected official or appointed employee will fn it to - valuable "refresher" co be a valua es arse. In response to numerous requests, we have ' tia ed t a special "spouse "_ registration.= = Program - — -2:15 p.m. _ Planning _- - • Under 1,000. Robert Lockyear, Planning Director, Saturday; January 28 T - - Washington County - - - • 1,000 - 5,000: Scott Larson, Administrator- Clerk, - 7:30 a.m. :Registration -- a - - __ = Cambridge - - -- _ • Over 5,000: Duane Zaun, Mayor, Lakeville 8:00 a.m. -: Meet the League of Minnesota Cities and `. _ 3:15 p.m. = Refreshment Break Association of Metropolitan Municipalities - _ Staff Opportunity to meet on a one- to-one basis with key staff _ 3:30 p.m. Personnel and Labor Relations - _- J .Under 1,000: Susan Lundell Clerk - Treasurer; Brooten members on an informal basis. Refreshments will be = _ • 1,000 - 5,000: Bill Jokela, Clerk- Administrator, Sandstone available. __ : _ = <. ^ -_. _- _ • Over 5,000: Moms Lanning, Mayor, Moorhead 8:30 a.m. -., Welcome and Introductions - ='4:30 p.m. ' Adjournment Donald Slater, Executive Director, LMC° 9:00 a.m. -- _ Councils: What They Ca—h -6nd Cannot Do - -- ..:.............. ...... _ .......... ... ..... ............................... .....:.... _ - Michael McCauley, City Attorney, Mankato __ -- General Information 10:00 a.m. Personal Liability and Conflict of Interest'—­--.- - _ -- Fee George Hoff, Attorney, Hoff &Allen, P.A.. _ The conference fee is $50 and includes tuition; materials, luncheon, and 10:45 a.m:' Refreshment Break' _ _- — -_ . breaks. The "spouse" fee of $25 includes all the above except materials. 11:00 a.m. Open Meeting Law and Data Practices Act - Location - Trnothy Kung Attorney, LeVander, Gillen, Miller,. __ _ _ _ _ The conference will be at the Hotel - Sofitel,- 5601 West- =78th Street, - Anderson & Kuntz - r Bloomington. The hotel is located at the Northwest comer of Highways 494 _ - - - - and 100. - 12:00 noon Luncheon Survival Tactics for the Newly Elected Official Accommodations - Mary Anderson, Mayor, Golden Valley We have reserved a Block of sleeping rooms for Friday, January 27, 1989. - Afternoon Sessions - - _ " Governing Your City - Getting A Good'Start:----!--- Those requiring accommodations should complete the enclose4 registration .(Participants attend three sessions on budgeting and finance, planning, and form and mail directly to the Hotel Sofitel. To obtain our room.rate reduction personnel and labor relations designed specifically for their size city _ _ . - ($50 /single or double occupancy), please tell the hotel you are with the Con - Under 1,000; 1,000 - 5,000, and over 5,000.) _ - ference for Newly Elected Officials. . 1:00 p.m. Budgeting and Finance Y: _ - ` = Registration • • Under 1,000: Tom Thelen, Field Representative, LMC • 1,000 - 5,000: Ann Houle, Attorney at Law and Research. Register in advance by mailing the enclosed form. For multiple registrations, Analyst, LMC __ _ just duplicate the form. Registrations are due by Friday, January 11. _ • Over 5,000: Eugene Schiller, Director -of Finance and . - - Management Services, St. Paul - l ANNUAL' CONGRESSIONAL .CONFERENCE. I� National League of Cities 1989 Congressional -City Conference ,National League of Cities Institute 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 ?'IIA ualI epu02V NONPROFITORG. U.S. POSTAGE PAID PERMIT NO. 4815 WASHINGTON, D.C. I I I _ t I v 'c- r r-------------------- - - - - -- --------------------------------------------- I I 1 1 '-'fl N FORM I Ps,,EG1STRA 0 I I j Please type or print HOTEL ACCOMMODATIONS RESERVATION REQUEST (Please type or print) I N Sex M F El Please make my hotel reservation as indicated below. I Tide ❑ I do not require hotel accommodations. City or Organization ® To accommodate your special needs, e.g., wheelchair accessible rooms, lease contact the Conference Registration Center. P 8 Mailing Address t I 1 City State Zip I Telephone ( ) I I Family Members Attending (No registration fee required): 1 1 Spouse Full Name Sex M F 1 Child Age 1 Child Age I Arrival Date / / Time Departure date / / Time I will be sharing my room with: Co-Occupant Name State Zip Telephone ( ) CREDIT CARD AUTHORIZATION Credit Card Company Card Number Bank Number Expiration Date Card Holder Signature 1 1. ❑ This is my first Congressional -City Conference. 1 2. ❑ 1 would like travel assistance from the NLC Conference Travel Center. Indium your fm hoice hotel with the number 1. 1 Number other hauls from 2 to 12 in order of your Check appljcable Conference Registration fee and enter total fees in the r preferen¢. You must number all hotels. right hand column: ADVANCE REGISTRATION FEES (Postmarked by February 1, 1989) ❑ $220 Direct Member Fee' $ ❑ $220 Associate Member Fee' $ ❑ $295 Non -Member & Indirect Member Fee" $ ❑ $295 Other- $ I PRE- CONFERENCE SEMINARS AND SPECIAL EVENTS 1 ❑ $85 Transition 1 $ 1 ❑ $85 Campaign Skills $ 1 ❑ $85 Environmental Programs $ I ❑ $85 Real Estate Assets $ ❑ $85University Communities $ j ❑ $85 Policy Leaders $ ❑ $50 Affordable Housing $ Consuh the Conference Registration renter for Information on suites. The NrLC Conference Regisoa ton Center and/or the NLC Conference Travel Center are authorized to use the above and w guarantee my hotel reser aura and/or to Lssue aidbre tickm reserved by me to attend this conference. l undersand that one night's room charge I. be billed through this cud if 1 fail show up for my assigned housing on the confirmed date unless 1 have —led my reservation with the hotel at least 48 hours in advance. I also understand drat 1 may return any unused any for ravel pure a _l by — -rd for full refund as a result of thus cancellation unless the fare terms published by the au. line carry a cancellation penalty. j ❑ $50 Cable Franchising S TV Choice Hotel ❑ $22 Minority Caucus Coalition Breakfast $ CC Single Double EM Dupont Plaza (A) 125 125 ER Embassy Row (B) 132 148 EX Embassy Square (C) 104 -125 119 -140 EZ Hay Adams (D) 140 -165 140 -165 Highland (E) 88 98 MB Mayflower (F) 109 -145 129 -155 CK Omni Georgetown (G) 105 125 RR Quality Hotel Central (H) 84 94 SA Ritz - Carlton (1) 145 165 UN Sheraton Washington 0) 89 -99 109 -119 PL Washington Hilton (K) 84 -124 104 -144 AH Hilton Towers (L) 175 195 j ❑ $50 Cable Franchising S TV ❑ $22 Minority Caucus Coalition Breakfast $ CC P•�____ 'on-site fee $255 after February 1, 1989 1 "Orr -site fee $330 after February 1, 1989 Pkase mum this form wnh yaur rem tun Wyman to: Make check payable for the total amount of the conference registration fees to: NLC end— Reg—fi Cenm NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CrM P O. Box 17413 M11- Inienu—I An,. * Cancellation letters must be postmarked rte. February 17 and ad! "7 `. "°' 7 W-I inwrm. n C Ml Phone (MD 626310D I cancellations are subject to a $30 cancellation fee. * No telephone registrations or cancellations will be accepted. l 1 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: PMK I REd SUBTYPE HTLBLK C� CODE n s C PMCAMt TYPE, S I _ I D� 1 T - =ions 1 - - - will be held at the - — -' - -- Washington Hilton BEGINNING ANEW: CHALi ENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES 301 FOR TM NATION'S CITIES Rr TOWNS —president and a new Congress will soon begin laying out the agenda for our next decade. How they frame the issues –and how they meet them –may well sig- nal a new era for the nation and our cities and towns. The Congressional -City Conference is your first and best opportunity to see what may be in store for America's cities and towns. And it's your first and best chance to do something about it. You need to be there. You need to spot the key players–in the White House, on the Hill, in the halls of the agencies. You need to get to know them and their positions. And you need to make sure they understand yours. The first hundred days of any presidency are the most critical. During those crucial days, the new president will set priorities, set forth initiatives to lead the nation, devel- op a relationship with Congress that will shape our future, and submit a new budget. New leaders in the Congress will be setting their own priorities and agendas. There is no more important time to be present than at the beginning. The decisions of those first few days and the reaction of the Congress will set the tone for the remainder of the presidency. That's why you need to be at the Congressional -City Conference. It's a unique opportunity to be in on the beginning of a new administration– and to represent your community and its people during those impor- tant first days. But it's more. It's an opportunity to add your voice to those of your colleagues and speak for the public interest. TWO CEWRAL QUESTIONS As we begin a new decade, a new administration, and a new Congress, we confront two central questions. Where will our children live? We need to know what role the federal government will play in helping us meet the shelter needs of our fami- lies and children and in providing an environment free of drugs, crime, and AIDS. How will they compete? We need to feel secure that they will grow up to participate in an economy that is competitive in world trade, that we will be able to provide the infras- tructure, education, and job training they need. SEVEN ISSUES In the first hundred days of 1989, the new president and Congress will take up seven issues that will direct- ly affect your community. At the Congressional -City Conference, you'll meet the key players on these issues. To EARTH, OR UP, UP AND AWAY? The federal government spends more on foreign aid than it does on the nation's cities and towns. When it decided in 1988 to increase spend- ing on space, it did so at the expense of some down -to -earth pro- grams–municipal waste water con - struction grants, homeless assistance, the so-called war on drugs, and the Urban Development Action Grant program. President Reagan's last budget will, as required by the Gramm - Rudman law, reduce the 1990 deficit to no more than $100 billion. The new president's first budget presum- ably will meet that same target. But reducing the annual federal deficit to $100 billion will require at least $60 billion in spending cuts and tax increases under the best of circumstances –that is, assuming no recession. For the nation's cities and towns, that involves fundamental questions of fairness and hard questions about priorities. The budget decisions made in the fast hundred days will have a direct bearing on your next budget, on the scope of new and unfunded federal mandates, and on our economy. Wbat are the specifics of such a deficit reduction plan? Wbat would those specifics mean for water and sewer taxes? Wbat would they mean for our elementary scbools? Wbat would tbey mean for our property tax rate? Wbat would they mean for our roads and bridges? Wbat would they mean for our autbority to issue municipal bonds? How will they affect our efforts to figbt drugs and bomelessness in our streets? TAX Bm: WASHINGTON WRIITS 'EM, ) GrM PAY'EM The taxing of municipalities is a growing part of Washington's annual tax bill. In the fast hundred days of 1989, the administration and Congress will be shaping still anoth- er tax bill to set a tone for the next four years. At the same time, the new tax bill will determine the direc- tion of our own municipal rights. Whether next year's tax bill will be designed for deficit reduction, technical corrections, extending expiring programs, or to create new tax breaks is uncertain. What is certain, however, is that the new Congress and administra- tion will face fundamental choices about the nation's cities and towns. They can continue the steady pro- cess of erosion of the past six years, or they can restore some of our rights and abilities to raise our own revenues to meet national and local needs and priorities. Specifically, the new administra- tion and Congress will have to decide whether to: • extend the mortgage revenue bond program; • extend the small issue industri- al development bond program; • extend the low income housing credit program; • extend the targeted jobs tax credit program. The new administration and Congress will have to determine whether to follow the course of increasing mandated restrictions upon our authority to issue tradition- al governmental purpose municipal bonds, or to set a new course to bet- ter enable us to finance the cost of building pre - primary schools, drug treatment centers, low income hous- ing, and new investment in infras- tructure. The course they choose next spring will directly affect each of us and our ability to build and rebuild our own communities. What, specifically, is their position with regard to municipal bonds? If local governments cannot tax the federal government, will officials from the new administration spell out precisely whether and under what circumstances the federal gov- ernment can tax municipalities, whether on the interest on our bonds, or the gas for our police cars? Housm: SHORT TERM SHELTER, LONG TERM SOLUTION On any given night, 100,000 American children are homeless on the streets of our cities and towns, says a report by the National Academy of Science. And, the report added, "The growing phenomenon of homeless children is nothing short of a national disgrace that must be treated with the urgency such a situation demands." We need to find out if the admin- istration and Congress agree, and, if they do, how they propose to end it. Homelessness is almost uniquely a municipal problem, cited as a severe problem by more than half of the cities responding to an NLC sur- vey last year. How the new adminis- tration and Congress respond next year is of signal importance to American cities —and more impor- tant, to anyone young or old that has no home. Shelter is necessary, but it's only a short term answer. The long term solutions lie in the development and maintenance of low income and affordable housing. One of the fast issues of 1989 will be reauthorization of the nation's housing and community develop- ment programs, which expire on September 30, 1989. Key tax pro- grams to leverage investment into single and multifamily municipal housing programs are also set to expire. The question of whether or how to reauthorize comes, moreover, at a time when homeownership has gone beyond the reach of a growing number of American families. It comes as the nation will begin to reap the grim harvest of eight years of severe disinvestment in housing opportunities. In the coming decade, more than three million contracts to provide federal housing assistance to families are scheduled to expire. Nothing is in place to replace them. A key part of the issue of where our children will live will be deter- mined by the tax and budget priori- ties agreed to by the new Congress and president. But beyond the ques- tion of whether the nation is willing to share in the goal of providing decent, safe, and sanitary shelter for all Americans is the question of how such new policies and laws will be shaped. Will the new administration and Congress support a rein- vestment into housing opportu- nities, and (f soq bow will they pay? What solutions wig they pro- pose to deal u*b the time bomb? How would they propose to preserve existing assisted housing? What new programs would they propose to provide bous- ing opportunities? What wild the role of cities and towns be in any new feder- al housing policy? Do they support reautbo- rization of the CDBG program, and if sq are they supporting any changes?. ENVUtONMENP: FEDERAL GOALS, LOCAL CC>M Whatever the concern —clean air, transportation of hazardous materi- als, medical syringes on public beaches, solid waste disposal, asbestos, or radon —the federal gov- ernment is certain to reassure the nation of its concern for health and safety. Reassurance, however, isn't all that's needed. The current EPA administrator, Lee Thomas, warned state and municipal officials last spring that the 1990s will bring new and more burdensome federal envi- ronmental mandates to clean up the ground, air, and water in our com- munities. But the deficit and budget priorities make it unlikely that the 1990s will bring any new federal assistance. Internal EPA studies admit that the cost of existing federal environmen- tal mandates is beyond the fiscal capacity of many small towns and cities. There has been no systematic effort to determine how our cities and towns can finance these federal requirements. There is, however, a systematic and continual effort in the Congress and at Treasury to restrict cities' ability to issue the tax exempt bonds with which to pay for these mandates themselves. In their first hundred days, the new president and Congress will return to the unfinished business of clean air, acid rain, solid waste dis- posal, transportation of hazardous materials, and municipal incinera- tors. How much will these propos- als cost? How can that cost be met? Wig baxardous materials transportation legislation pre- empt municipal rights and authority? What options will we bane for solid waste disposal? HUntAN DEmop mar: OVERDUE IINwsnWE T1'5 One of the most critical directions the new administration and Congress will consider is human investment. After a decade in which investment in debt and military pro- curement have been our highest spending priorities, the federal gov- ernment will have to determine whether it can afford not to invest in its single most important resource: the people who live in home towns in every part of America. In perhaps no area is our stake greater. How these decisions are made will determine the future of not just our cities and towns, but our country. Poverty today is epidemic among infants, children, and young fami- lies. Tb ree- fourths of all black chil- dren, and one - fourth of all white children, in our country spend at least some time in poverty. By the end of the next decade, more than one -third of all school age children in our cities and towns will be living in poverty. These are the children most at risk of never making it—or of dropping out. One million of our young people drop out of high school every year. In some inner city high schools half of the students quit before they fin- ish. Yet, by the year 2000, more than half of all newly created jobs will require at least some education beyond high school. Four out of every ten poor Americans today are children. They are the future Army, Navy, Marines and Air Force. They are the workers who will compete against the Japanese, the Koreans, and the West Germans. Yet if they are bom into poverty, the odds against them grow with each day of their lives. Failure to invest in today's children will . have a dangerously high cost for our communities in years to come. As the new administration and Congress rum to human develop- ment issues, they are almost certain to return to the issues of child care, parental leave, drug abuse, aids, and universal access to some minimum level of health care. Human investment is an area in which cities and towns have not had a traditional relationship with the federal government. But it is an area in which we have perhaps the great- est stake of any level of government. Will the administration pro- pose programs to coordinate and reinforce our own efforts? Will they impose new and costly mandates? Or will they bypass cities and towns entirely? And bow will the Congress read? What bills to help our children will be Congressional priorities? MAIL ORDER SAM TAX: NEW MUNICIPAL REVENUES The new Congress will consider legislation to authorize the collec- tion of state and local sales taxes on mail order catalog sales. This legisla- tion would prevent erosion of local tax bases and ensure fair competi- tion for local businesses. It could mean $500 trillion in additional rev- enues for municipalities at no cost to the federal government. What are the big's chances? Who are the supporters wt whom we can work? How would the biB work if enadetw MANDATED BE NUM, MANDATED COM In recent years, the federal govem- ment has imposed an increasing number of mandates through the federal tax code on municipal bene- fits from requiring mandatory partic- ipation and payments of the federal Medicare ax to the new rules under Section 89 on employee benefits. Will this trend continue? What is the outlook of the new administration with regard to municipal employee benefits? What new efforts are likely to emerge in the Congress? YOUR BEST CHANCE The Congressional City- Conference is your best chance to influence the new administration and Congress. Because policies of the new administration and Congress will have such a direct impact on your city or town, whether through man- dates or funding or successful pro- grams to alleviate pressing problems, it is important to draw out each candidate and to take the time to ask the hard questions. STATE MUNICIPAL IFAi AcnMTIES Dates and times vary. Consult your league director. A .. ., - DATES TO PROGRAM IN BRIEF a 1 1989 -r . �'advytrt6erggistrationan txrsutg SATURDAY, MARCH 11 + a• reguest.Alliequests,mu ?. _; Prie•Corl jerrnce Sem6tar� ��;, marked �gtiiis date After �a�e,;' kr Full�layseminars \i }� �I`delegatesutt}stregisteron f Ti E ioite:YourElectoialCaMeargn 17,'1989 —. dlmefoq: ?� calncellahgr�Cancelladonletters " UnrvetsiryCommumry ? 'musfbepostmaikedby- date, e oR B and are subiect'ta:a $30 cancellation, ;� Deve N Stra es fqr tliarge. Vwie are no refunds for ` ,Taking Charge "o'F ty's, ttons'after tlu5 dale Real Estate Asserts OW TO O REGISTER Tiarisirion :TheFlncreasutgRoleof Minority. Elected Officals ' To register foi the 1989 )Poliey.Leaders: Child Care"-;' .mortal City Corifetenoe liflF I y seminars . s Put the rT!! anon fp an¢ rehurt -' Cable Franchrsmg into a Chre ; u'a! tth yotaclieck or atyporr;hase y 1� Future?,' ? �Qtrier to the NLC Cpn�`CrettdP f" Affo� able Hou, g Porwatding r tegtstrauon Center, by }`S tai espo�r live Stiategy ;t Feb 1 1989 - r _ i ?east! ' y.' Each delegate guest, s 9 Q0 l�noon 'a ngs member of the press,. and any other l human Development r erence �3`[tiapant'must n et Transportation and �ommunirations k ere rs.no tltarge_for spouse .t Finance, Admmrstrati8n & t� youth br Mess �egLsuations Interemmental Relations telephone registrations or cancella ^., r lions will acre ted. Deadline for' y' 136 p m 4e30 p °t t r advance regrsuauon is Febnraty 1 J Q4mmurtity and Econonuc 1 7989 Paymgnt must be uuluded Developtrtent fi q}t advanceregtstraGons People ji Ertergy Eivr�ionment and Natural linable to rgeet the febhiiy i dea_d i r TiiCwrllhave tQ reguteorr sttq at- .- �....: -��� local officials providing NLC, PTI and ICMA databases, fax capability, on -line conferencing, legislative news and more. Training will be ADV available for subscribers is Local A N Exchange who want to learn how to maximize use of this service. GUARANTEED LOWEST AIR FARES NLC Conference Travel Center guar- antees to book you on the lowest available air fare at the time of reser- vations. This air fare may be a restricted published discount or an unpublished unrestricted special negotiated fare, whichever best suits your travel needs. Air fare discounts could range from 5 percent off the published Ultra -Saver with restric- tions to the unpublished unrestricted negotiated fare of 30 percent or more off coach. For more informa- tion call NLC Conference Travel Center at (800) 303239 or (703) 471-0460. SATURDAY, MARCH 11 PRE- CONFERENCE SEMINARS AND SPECIAL EVENTS Hone Your Electoral Campaign Skills 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Registration jee $85 This all -day seminar focuses on the strategic and tactical skills that make local elections cost -effective and successful. The morning session, devoted to elements of planning, message development and choices of communication channels, will include the components of a cam- paign, planting a strategy, message development and communication goals and organization and cam- paign management techniques. The afternoon session will cover developing your information base (home -grown or inexpensive public opinion surveys, issue research and opposition analysis), targeting direct voter contact (phone, door-to-door and mail), producing the media (emphasis on print materials, with discussion of radio and television advertising) and raising the money (techniques for funding a low -bud- get campaign). This seminar will be taught by two professional trainers with experi- ence in municipal elections. Developing New Strategies for Environmental Programs 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Regimntion fee: $85 This all-day workshop will review existing federal environmental laws and regulations, address some of the most pressing environmental issues and show you what other cities are doing to reduce pollution, manage municipal and industrial waste, clean -up hazardous waste sites, and implement integrated waste reduc- tion programs. Participants will learn how to develop strategies for multi- layered cooperation and fund- ing of these initiatives. � 7 30 a m`:: A , reseri atlb 'R ti ::State.Muriiapalleagu'e Presidents furrd5 will de a cancel, NONPROFIT ORG. �= and Executive Directors' Breakfast 7atlons received by,Febniary l7, site' �TmontyCaudrs Cpali GoNrt Breakdast U.S. POSTAGE PAID W. a m -12cb0 noon lect;4a�i, Q,t nCeBgtlong ow ' Caa�]Idtton lettets:n4tutbC ptrst PERMIT NO. Policy.ComrtutteesPlenary '0_ . $y.tiifsdate. NQ, *phbpe. _ 4815 215 P.M. ; 4j p m tltlel s caitCeDaGonzvdl l acrepted N9 Ord alrefitndswillbe,maderf WASHINGTON, D.C. y Tes!L>acbeda`; 430 s decide not to attend partinriac X2:00 p p.m `: Policy C r t mtttee�&V' tgs, r I 430p k '&00pm 4 I;OIPiS } CottstitueM Group Meetings i b00 P m 740 p % ppu rieett hoLPl etzo odatloa3,' ;`Welootrt I Recepti n lease c ecktfte R priate box on, NLC ' - MONDAY, MAR Cg73 ` t .;egrStraHtu>,form. will not, ptiake a hgtel'resecvation for yott 8 00 am -980'a m * tfir" you lia4tegistered for the I?ete pies' B yirialdast cogerence.:Rpoms'cvill be assigned ; 1000 a, •�; 1 me ni; oa oft a flrit ome fast served basis. , r •Legislative Workshops TFie mnferencewill be held at the; t 12 30 pm 2:00 P m. SRashtngton Hilton Hotel �elegate'Luncheon t 230 p.m - 4:30 pm. ` ' LOCAL EXCHANGE ` o g' Legislative Workshops `• NLC`s new electronic messaging and - database communications network TUESDAY, MARCH 14' . .Local Exchange —is up and nmgiog: -`: Congressional appointments on A. display will be open during` ftis - Capitol Hill. Shuttle bus service will ._' ,;ration hours to answer. questl__' _ ' be provided from the Hilton Hotel, " :.: and demonstrate how yott save '• ` to the Capitol continuously until money and valuable tirte signing 10:00 a.m. Consult your league on to Local Exchange: j director for scheduling congression- Exchange will beoti a primary al appointments. t` ' electronic communications link for . I local officials providing NLC, PTI and ICMA databases, fax capability, on -line conferencing, legislative news and more. Training will be ADV available for subscribers is Local A N Exchange who want to learn how to maximize use of this service. GUARANTEED LOWEST AIR FARES NLC Conference Travel Center guar- antees to book you on the lowest available air fare at the time of reser- vations. This air fare may be a restricted published discount or an unpublished unrestricted special negotiated fare, whichever best suits your travel needs. Air fare discounts could range from 5 percent off the published Ultra -Saver with restric- tions to the unpublished unrestricted negotiated fare of 30 percent or more off coach. For more informa- tion call NLC Conference Travel Center at (800) 303239 or (703) 471-0460. SATURDAY, MARCH 11 PRE- CONFERENCE SEMINARS AND SPECIAL EVENTS Hone Your Electoral Campaign Skills 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Registration jee $85 This all -day seminar focuses on the strategic and tactical skills that make local elections cost -effective and successful. The morning session, devoted to elements of planning, message development and choices of communication channels, will include the components of a cam- paign, planting a strategy, message development and communication goals and organization and cam- paign management techniques. The afternoon session will cover developing your information base (home -grown or inexpensive public opinion surveys, issue research and opposition analysis), targeting direct voter contact (phone, door-to-door and mail), producing the media (emphasis on print materials, with discussion of radio and television advertising) and raising the money (techniques for funding a low -bud- get campaign). This seminar will be taught by two professional trainers with experi- ence in municipal elections. Developing New Strategies for Environmental Programs 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Regimntion fee: $85 This all-day workshop will review existing federal environmental laws and regulations, address some of the most pressing environmental issues and show you what other cities are doing to reduce pollution, manage municipal and industrial waste, clean -up hazardous waste sites, and implement integrated waste reduc- tion programs. Participants will learn how to develop strategies for multi- layered cooperation and fund- ing of these initiatives. �E PROGRAM Economic Development Taking Charge of Your City's Real Estate Assets 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Registration fee: $85 Publicly-owned real estate, from strategic downtown parcels to vacant building and land, is one of a city's most valuable, yet underuti- lized assets. This full day working seminar will examine the types of hidden opportunities found in pub- lic real estate, techniques for assess- ing resources and revenue potential and strategies for developing a sys- tematic approach to managing a city's public real estate portfolio. Transition: The Increasing Role of Minority Elected Officials 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Registration fee: S85 During this full day seminar key offi- cials will review and examine some of the critical issues faced by mmori- ty local elected officials and discuss how changing demographics will factor into the new strategies that will be necessary to effectively gov- ern at the local level. Policy Leaders: "Child Care Growth for Cities and Growth for Children" 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Registratron fee: $85 There is an increase in the demand for high quality child care and other child and family support services. An increasing number of parents in the workforce seek child care at or close to their place of work. Provision of child care services can help workforce participants perform their jobs more effectively. This all - day session will examine how a city can profit from high quality day care. Specifically, participants will examine zoning and land use poli- cies, building and space considera- tions, financing mechanisms and other ways to encourage the avail- ability and affordability of child care. Affordable Housing: Formulating a Responsive Strategy 1:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. Registration fee: $50 Although the majority of Americans may be well housed, there is a growing number of individuals and families who are finding it more and more difficult to obtain clean, safe and affordable housing. There is probably no single cause for the housing problems communities face, nor is there a single solution. This session will examine several community approaches to imple- menting a successful housing pro- gram. Participants will to learn about several local strategies that have been developed to increase the availability and quality of low and middle- income housing. Cable Franchising into a One- Wire Future? 2:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. Registration fee: $50 Fiberoptics and high tech electronics will have the capacity to bring the- atre quality pictures into every home. This workshop will examine issues local officials face in trying to make the transition from their cur- rent cable systems to those that;will keep pace with a world economy based on high speed information transmission. Issues will include cable transfers in ownership, fran- chise renewals and telephone com- pany entry into cable. The University- Community Connection: Partnerships for 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Registration fee: $85 Cities large and small are building partnerships for progress with local universities and colleges. Communities and universities are working together on cooperative economic development efforts, edu- cation and training initiatives, stu- dent behavior issues, planning programs, cultural events, and other endeavors. This seminar, sponsored by NLC's University Communities Caucus, will examine the founda- tions of such partnerships and explore a variety of university-com- munity strategies for specific local programs. Minority Caucus Coalition Breakfast 7:30 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. Registration fee: S22 ($27 on -site) NLC's Minority Caucus Coalition (made up of the Asian Pacific American Municipal Officials, Hispanic Elected Local Officials, National Black Caucus of Local Elected Officials, and Women in Municipal Government) will con- vene its Sixth Annual Breakfast on Sunday, March 12, from 7:30 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. A featured speaker will address timely issues of common concern. Everyone is invited to attend. SPECIAL EVENTS Delegates' Luncheon: An administra- tion official will address the confer- ence on a key urban issue. suNDAY, MARCH 12 POLICY COMMITTEE MEE`MGS The Community and Economic Development Committee will con- tinue to monitor legislative activities on the development of a federal housing policy and its related issues.. Additionally, the committee will review the pertinent issues within economic development in order to prepare comprehensive policy in that area. The Energy, Environment and Natural Resources Committee will continue to examine problems posed by the statutory deadlines and standards under the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act and will revise existing NLC policy on these issues where necessary. The committee will also react to new federal regula- tions implementing the Safe Drinking Water Act, the Clean Water Act, Superfund and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984. The committee also will begin preliminary discussions on the envi- ronmental impact of global warm- ing. The Finance, Administration and Intergovernmental Relations Committee will examine the impact of declining federal funds to cities and the accompanying rise in mandated responsibilities. A con- tinued emphasis will be the imposi- tion of federally required labor practices on municipal employers. Federal tax and budget issues impacting cities will remain as a focus for the committee's work. The Human Development Committee will continue to monitor legislative activities in the area of parental leave, child care, minimum wage and minimum health benefits for employees and other related issues. The committee will also work to establish a comprehensive drug policy. The Transportation and Communications Committee will work on developing a comprehen- sive position on the future of federal highway and transit programs. The committee will also begin a thor- ough review of air safety and ai, issues and update existing N'LC . cy where necessary. Committee members will also continue to moni- tor and react to changes in cable regulations. MONDAY, MARCH � Breakfast Session NLC's presi- dent will budine the League's lobby- ing priorities for 1989. Worksbops: Morning and after- noon workshops will cover key leg- islative and regulatory issues, the important policy makers in Congress and the executive branch, and the points to emphasize in lobbying. Delegates'Luncbeow A congres- sional leader will set out urban viewpoints on key issues. TUESDAY, MARCH 14 Visits to Capitol Hill: State municipal leagues and individual city officials will meet congressional delegations to emphasize local views on key issues.Consult your league director about scheduling. If you would like NLC to schedule. an appointment for you on the Hill during the conference, call (202) 626 -3020 before the meetin, Any appointments made by Nu must be confirmed before the m. ing. Shuttle bus service will be pro- vided from the Hilton Hotel to the Capitol continuously until 10:00 a.m. -- i A. o e A �° REPORT /RECOMMENDATION •' ~�NPORNS£O X888 To: KENNETH E. ROSLAND Agenda Item # ix. A. , From: CITY MANAGER Consent 0 MARCELLA DAEHN CITY CLERK _ Information Only ❑ Date: JANUARY 9, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: 0 To Council DEPOSITORIES FOR CITY FUNDS Action . ❑ Motion F1 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Council adoption of .a Resolution Designating Depositories for Public Funds of the City of Edina. Info /Background: At the first regular Council Meeting of the year, the Council should select official - depositories for public funds of the City. A copy of the recommended Resolution is attached. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DEPOSITORIES BE IT RESOLVED that the First Edina National Bank. Edina, MN, First Southdale National Bank, Edina, MN, Americana State Bank of Edina, Edina, MN, Southwest Fidelity State Bank, Edina, MN, First National Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis, MN, Marquette Bank Minneapolis, Minneapolis MN and Norwest Bank MetroWest, Edina, HN authorized to do banking business in Minnesota, be and hereby are designated as Official Depositories for the Public Funds of the City of Edina, County of Hennepin, Minnesota, until January 1, 1990. ADOPTED this 9th day of January 1989. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 9, 1989, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand acid seal of said City this 9th day of, January, 1989. City Clerk B H� o Cn �eaa REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KENNETH ROSLAND Agenda Item * IX. B. From: CITY MANAGER MARCELLA DAEHN Consent ❑X CITY CLERK Information Only ❑ Date: JANUARY 9, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: ] To Council SIGNATORY RESOLUTION Action . ❑Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Council adoption of a Signatory Resolution authorizing the Mayor, Manager and Treasurer of the City to act in the transaction of banking business. Info /Background: At the first regular Council Meeting of..the year, the Council should adopt a Signatory Resolution which authorizes the persons holding office as Mayor, Manager and Treasurer of the City to act for this municipality in the.transaction of any banking business with the named banks. A copy of the recommended Resolution is attached. SIGNATORY RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED that the persons holding office as Mayor, Manager and Treasurer of the City of Edina, be, and they hereby are, authorized to act for this municipality in the transaction of any banking business with First Edina National Bank, First Southdale National Bank, Americana State Bank of Edina, Southwest Fidelity State Bank, First National Bank of Minneapolis, Marquette Bank Minneapolis and Norwest Bank MetroWest (hereinafter referred to as the "Bank ") from time to time and until written notice to any Bank to the contrary, to sign checks against said accounts, which checks will be signed by the Mayor, Manager and City Treasurer. Each Bank is hereby authorized and directed to honor and pay any checks against such account which is signed as above described, whether or not said check is payable to the order of, or deposited to the credit of. any officer or officers- of the City, including the signer or signers of the check. ADOPTED this 9th day of January, 1989. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 9, 1989, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 9th day of January, 1989. City Clerk /1 ^r\ En \'N�RPOMS�O� REPORT /RECOMMENDATION - 1 To: KENNETH ROSLAND Agenda Item # ix. c. From: CITY MANAGER MARCELLA DAEHN, Consent 0 CITY CLERK - Information Only ❑ Date: JANUARY 9, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA S_ ubject: 0 To Council FACSIMILE SIGNATURES Action . ❑ Motion El Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Council adoption of a Resolution Authorizing Use of Facsimile Signatures by Public Officials. Info /Background: At the first regular Council Meeting of the year, the Council should authorize the use of facsimile signatures by the Mayor, Manager and Treasurer on checks, drafts, warrants, vouchers, etc., or other orders of public funds deposited with the City's banks. A copy.of the recommended Resolution is attached. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING USE OF FACSIMILE SIGNATURES BY PUBLIC OFFICIALS RESOLVED that the use of facsimile signatures by the following named persons: FREDERICK S. RICHARDS - MAYOR KENNETH E. ROSLAND - CITY MANAGER JOHN WALLIN - CITY TREASURER on checks. drafts. warrants, warrant- checks, vouchers or other orders of public funds deposited in First Edina National Bank, First Southdale National Bank, Americana State Bank of Edina, Southwest Fidelity State Bank..First National Bank of Minneapolis, Marquette Bank Minneapolis and Norwest Bank MetroWest, be and hereby is approved, and that each of said named persons may authorize said depository banks to honor any such instrument bearing his facsimile signature in such form as he may designate and to charge the same to the account in said depository bank upon which drawn as fully as though it bore his manually written signature and that instruments so honored shall be wholly operative and binding in favor of said depository bank although such facsimile signature shall have been affixed without his authority. ADOPTED this 9th day of January, 1989. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, Marcella M. Daehn, duly appointed City Clerk for the City of Edina, Hennepin County, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of "Resolution Authorizing Use of Facsimile Signatures by Public Officials ". with the original thereof as recorded in the Minutes of the Edina City Council held Monday, January 9, 1989, and that the same is a true and correct copy of said original record, and that said Resolution was adopted by said City Council at said Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 9th day of January, 1989. City Clerk AUTHORIZATION OF FACSIMILE SIGNATURES BY PUBLIC OFFICIALS: We, Frederick S. Richards, Kenneth E. Rosland, and John Wallin, being the Mayor, City Manager and City Treasurer, respectively. and being duly authorized to sign checks, drafts, warrants, warrant- checks, vouchers and other orders on public funds thereof deposited in the above named DEPOSITORY BANKS, do hereby certify that the facsimile impressed or appended on this page is a facsimile of our signatures in the form which maybe used on any such instrument in place of our manually written signatures, and we hereby authorize said depository banks to honor any such instrument bearing the facsimile of our signatures in said form and to charge the same to the account of said public body in said depository bank upon which drawn as fully as though it bore our manually written signatures. Instruments so honored shall be wholly operative and binding in favor of said depository bank although such facsimile signature shall have been affixed without authority. WITNESS: MAYOR - CITY *TANAGER CITY TREASURER ii— n _ �� REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KEN ROSLAND Agenda Item # IX-.Di-.l & 2 From: CITY MANAGER Consent X❑ JOHN WALLIN DIRECTOR OF FINANCE Information Only ❑ Date: JANUARY 9, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: ❑ To Council ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITIES IN LIEU OF BOND Action . ❑ Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Approve the assignments of securities as good and sufficient collateral of public funds made by the City's depositories First Bank Edina and Marquette Bank,Minneapolis. Info /Background: According to State Statute, every depository must provide collateral or other security to the City to protect it against financial loss because of the depository's failure or mismanagement. The assignment authorizes the City to sell all or as much of the collateral as is needed to reimburse it for any amount lost through default of the institution. Copies of the resolutions are attached. s RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITIES IN LIEU OF BOND - FIRST BANK EDINA BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota. approves the assignment of its depository, First Bank Edina, of the following securities, as good and sufficient collateral for the City of Edina Public Funds deposited in said depository: Description Rate Due Par Value U S Treasury Notes 7.25 Notes G -93 7.250 7/15/93 $3,460,000.00 Huntington Cnty PA 6.400 10/15193 $ 300,000.00 Lenawee Cnty Mich /Adrian San Sew Sys 6.300 5/1/95 $ 100,000.00 Oregon St 7.000 1/1/95 $ 200,000.00 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY" OF EDINA ) $4,060,000.00 CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 9, 1989, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 9th day of January, 1989. City Clerk • ..- • RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITIES IN LIEU OF BOND - `LARQUETTE BANK MINNEAPOLIS BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota approves the assignment by its depository, Marquette Brink Minneapolis, of the following securities, as good and sufficient collateral for the City of Edina Public Funds deposited in said depository: Description U S Treasury votes M91 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) Rate Due Par Value 6.750 3/31/91 S 350.000.00 S 350,000.00 CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 9. 1989, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 9th day of January, 1989. City Clerk o �•,N�RPON`S�J less REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER From: RALPH JOHNSON, ASSESSOR Dater JANUARY 5, 1989 Subject: TAX FORFEITED LAND PARCEL AS REFERENCED IN 10/26/88 LETTER FROM HENNEPIN COUNTY. Recommendation: Agenda Item # Ix:E Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA X❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion X❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion WE SUGGEST A RESOLUTION APPROVING AUCTION TO'ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS AS DESCRIBED IN THE SECOND PARAGRAPH OF THE ATTACHED COUNTY LETTER. Info /Background: _ THERE IS NO.APPARENT NEED BY THE CITY FOR PUBLIC USE OF THE SUBJECT PARCEL. ATTACHED IS THE COUNTY LETTER WITH PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND A LOCATION MAP OF THE PARCEL. F T DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAX AND PUBLIC RECORDS A607 Government Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487-0067 HENNEPIN LF-U Crossroads To Service October 26, 1988 City of Edina Ralph Johnson 4801 W. 50th St. Edina , Pln . 55/124 Dear Mr. Johnson: Enclosed is a classification list on non - conservation land located in your municipality. The described parcels forfeited to the State of Minnesota.for non - payment of property taxes. As provided in Minnesota Statutes 282, we request that.you either approve the parcel (s) for public auction, auction to adjacent_ owners if Minnesota Statutes 282.01, Subdivision 7A is applicable, or request a conveyance to your municipality for public use. We require a certified copy of the City Council Resolution authorizing any action taken. If you request.that a parcel be conveyed to'your municipality, we also require that the form " Application By A Governmental Subdivision For Conveyance of Tax Forfeited Land" be completed and mailed to this office. Only new special assessments which were levied after the forfeiture need be certified to this department. The remaining balance of any assessment levied previously will be picked up automatically. Please be advised that if the City Council fails to respond within ninety (90) days of the date of this letter, the sale will be deemed to be approved. If you have any questions, you may contact the Forfeited Land Unit at 348 -3734, or myself at 348 -6989. Sincerely, Dale G. Folstad, Director Property Tax and Public Records Sharon J. Erion Tax Processing Section Supervisor DGF:SJE:be Enclosure copy to City Clerk HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer I- RUN DATL. 06/01/86 SC TWP RG QQ SFX/ PROPERTY ADDRESS LOT BLK 32 32- 117 -21 24 0001 24 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED v TOTAL NUMBER OF ACCOUNTS BY MIMIC .. NUN- CONSERVA'1'ION L7 72'i -NC HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY IN. ...1ATION SYSTEM REPORT NO: PI421101 LIST OF FORFEITED PROPERTY PAGE 8 PREVIOUS OWNER /DESCRIPTION DATE OF DATE OF BLDG MKT JUDGEMENT FORFEITURE VALUE VALUE EDINA JOHN B HALLORAN ETA 04/29/85 05/26/ 98 4x100 UNPLATTED 32 117 21 THAT PART OF THE SE 184 OF NW li4 ESTATE OF 30Hn1 B. NALLOIpAti LYING S OF W 56TH ST NLY OF U S HWY NO 169 AND 212 AND ELY OF C/o FL/ Z A g &T l i B. HALl -0 A-^1 p R LOT 9 BLK 2 MIRROR LAKES MEADOW 1 WOOD SECOND ADDITION TO EDINA HIGHLANDS 28 �� 1 15,�•ya, SKL/ �t'f3"�E r mwwuou U", It OB j5 ''�, IOS.3 6y'yti�► Q, " '. �. • ' ' ~ p•e5 ir' p. O4' 1 cb1 ,101.14 � �O + I( • I N% v f A/ RRM y f S J I'SO 26 •L31 ­32 13413 o �• •p '�T € - ,, wEDI A HI HLU �S , 9c r /I °r I, :, �. �` -GAO J u °��. to3 t o ! ' HEATHER LA "" 20".'s °� ~ 'w� ! r7 .17P E: • 1Jl• ,v 0, ' 97° 3� :,; ?S _r EADO - w oo 3 5 „ p MIR OR ;033 .r ��� >. A,.v ' 'SG" d ✓trf _t -e '• y 226.55 loo''` a.N 34 et• ,,; . QJ d� �1 S••�.� ('0 4 - ;S. E,4Iy f 50e.�4. • ,�{ °\,� d' QI V',.y a IZo• /' 'Z L' ,•-, ��( p' 'S3 0 e n'OV i r" -,•a0 - o i, P �.. .. - •� r�...,. �' �e ti.7•y/ 1 i„ r' ... �� 'e.PS '.Q.atl.lG �b f33 Sri � o <' � � �.� � 1'� �.�,a � c rlL R �t x w 'l!! 4 �• so. S rI' v � .Y .. /55.17 , . /00 I t4 i dl(e1 e!" , /�� Z EOIHn + �� a i' `ir .lf waWa4N0� �' diG' RD o r' l' EEVl4T fit' , 1. ,� ` wi l�O ° SECOND,, a; ti °. �;, �s' ADD T/O TOE '35" zz v i► . `Y: c, ..' •t4 :� 1 c' ? >•. ... �s c o ^ ,� Is /1b / 2/- o ` ° ae v 7 1. . ' a v • W 171 M is e X C 99.4 :J w v1 o v N r. a °r ��t �•1 , r C •. S6 r R• r! uc r� I .� c r v/ 81Y ! i •. ; r p r.. it is ;'� y " p L A oV ° ° ^`^ '1'V�r /2zp r rai ``S t ` n w Eo,NA �' .. c w c.: _ :.�`. � � -r - ... •.. 'T °i � - S� 4, e• 9•,a'z. ",::,; � Ake; � � rar ��, O� ' ; o ,�. p. f .s4 Lt :r. a' c �"' °s,c all a fV MIRROR: al T-11, ­4W) •�. Zj 0'. .9 , '•, F' r, •r> "' Ia'Z� A h' 1 �1 "i3q.t±^ d•�' d.. �?'.a�Td w.. Off° ems. `,. •^t: .4 d.3> Awl- to _ �•. f ,^••'+' / +.Nv \ j�i•�I +• ,` �...�r .fib /gf�:y y J �'" .YNr .•A H 'c ..a �+ Y r .. e i �f�f' 4 y�,yT�` v✓' i4 !' i ', i' , #� , Alf e� d:1t4o+� 3A o I VA .r r Na avr�� ���/�• , . `` y� i �Y r k y , ' �O :1 ( I 0 Iiae Ve c o o y! Ov .S � � � I • . (.V ► r. . � � �47r! `a_ .� t" a , • °e �j 'x", �r ifi+ b • ' � M � D oil '4 r `� ri i r, f i ..y pL� p •r I IO '•i 10 W �, v nT'�► �. V�" •i ~ ��•�. � �. .,�, . � '+.�`rN�J: -��� �,ae ��s( i•r:: �� '�tr!ti�' '` • 'a � � ,. � {7�1A ��• /. v � l y '+ p'a .. ?� ,�� .rf:+ xt.: S �: : _� ;�'$ = u461t • , • H A NT R E Y a'r•� 405 • 1 t� y , 111.T ! �'itit y.: I <sli, 'grtY� a+'• 5.�� i " R _ •` ��i•' '�'• 4u •4!y '�' _ Q/ ✓;,� '�'_e r." Fr .rf r r.-�N . � ° }.�1. y �. w11nt1 h �,. h''Ft #� ���� "SGr '- � �I f}�?d+►`ryy�•�{ifi .,% '`���1� �•• •^».i "x' �- ' M ° I �'� ja e ki IG • ,M r +�♦ ••,�1•�nJpj{I'r ih �'F °199 � r� ! -•�,. '..�' .R , S :.. 1 / '.``KK• •I) lOdp ��. L'• ;.• y, r..I� :J R A��+ V-� Xa1It W' a kJSSf 10 � ;: _ ' • •.� ��'�• °^ jii?��• •••► � .yr � "� "`� �� �'"� �► ��'�' . �JC� � � �� �6r �lv�J H �r '� :f)•: A Dom+ le' .; S.qj�_. � • � -,r :' , C '� .� r� -•,� � •�j � 1N^.c,�'• �(• � �`' .; 1 `A Il: i " �tM° t C•./ rt:,�r', V •_� ✓ - � o+. M ON �IM,� , / ` • ."� -' �j4y �`. �, �.v i,^ + n ►��� rVj� °`� .�11 �r }5�.a �.x r(. If II. Q, - •i' ` .,fir :4p .�,., y ••'>�', .�.•,,. r- /b'' 'W 4.i .,J�: op GLEN GARTY 'f o !j ' •,,vl " J � ti,c �.Z[ !� I � ^ :�••jc•r - I +, yyi..'�:,1 r :� f. iY ..'0°�1 i t Tl�� ` 1e •: O 'r , 001-: /" .f.. I it RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has received from the County of.Hennepin a list of lands in,said municipality which became the property of the State of Minnesota for non - payment of property taxes, which said list is dated 08/.01/88, Non - Conservation List 723 -NC; and WHEREAS, the,..parcel..descr.ibed .in ,.said._list_ has heretofore been classified by the Board of County Commissioners of Hennepin County,, Minnesota as non- conservation land and the sale thereof has heretofore been authorized by said Board of County Commissioners;. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by said City Council, acting pursuant to Minnesota Statute 282, that.the.said classification by said Board of County Commissioners of the parcel of land described in said list as non - conservation land be and the same is hereby approved, and that the sale of such parcel of land be limited to abutting property owners for attachment thereto. ADOPTED this 9th day of January, 1989. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 9, 1989 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and,seal of said City this 10th day of January, 1989. City Clerk C ART WORK SOLD _ _ - 23-2010- 000 -00 ART WORK SOLD 23 -2010- 000 -00 ART WORK SOLD 23 -2010- 000 -00 ART WORK SOLD - _23 -2010- 000 -00 ART WORK SOLD ARTWORK SOLD ART WORK SOLD ART WORK -SOLD_ ART WORK SOLD 009718 12/29/88 123.55 GARLINGHOUSE_�_ ART WORK SOLD 23 -2010- 000 -00 23 -2010- 000 -00 23 -2010- 000 -00 23 -2010- 000 -00 23 -2010- 000 -DO 23 -2010- 000 -00 IL 4. , -- _ -.. -_ - 14f,I _ :40I 5,�� 1541 _e1 ,6 e6� 25.20 s �I?nl 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 12/29/88 01 -09 -89 PAGE 1 BETTY PEDDIE � 3c9 - -- - - - - -- -- b I` 111 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. • MESSAGE T 341 VJ° ,_2 009700 12/29/88 134.50 YORK INTL CONTRACTED REPAIRS 30 -2010- 000 -00 56050 7662 ' SHARON MCKISSON ' 134.50 * 4 009712 12/29/88 009701 12/29/88 38.22 HILLYARD DRIMATIC COMPOUND 10- 2010 - 000 -00 30853 8282 55.50 s a, 38.22 * z 009713 12/29/88 009702 12/29/88 144.38 DON BERG CONSTR. BLDG PERMIT REFUND 10 -2010- 000 -00 63.06 «- - -- -. -- _ - 144.38 s _ - KRYSTAL LEEBRICK -- - -- „ 009703 12/29/88 135.00 AMRE BLDG SYS BLDG PERMIT REFUND 10 -2010- 000 -00 " - - - -- - - 95.00 * DONNA LA PORTE - 49 009704 12/29/88 130.90 MAUREEN BROCKWAY ART WORK SOLD 23 -2010- 000 -00 G� ' - -- - - - -- _130.90 _._ 52.50 DOROTHY HALL - - 52' ` 'G 009705 12/29/88 69.30 BETTY THOMPSON ART WORK SOLD 23 -2010- 000 -00 ° 54 009717 69.30 87.78 A GRIMSBY-------. ;;' -- 'A„ 009706 12/29/88 26.60 ROXANNE SORENSON ART WORK SOLD 23 -2010- 000 -00 21. - 26.60_ 009707 12/29/88 157.25 SPECIAL EFFECTS ART WORK SOLD 23- 2010 - 000 -00 -� �- 009707 12/29/88 51.99 SPECIAL EFFECTS ART WORK SOLD 23 -2010- 000 -00 - 209.24 * ;� 2c, -. . ?' 009708 _12/29/88_ _______ _, -__ 25.20. -_- _ BARBARA RICHARDS __. ART WORK_SOLD ___ __2372010- 000 -00 C ART WORK SOLD _ _ - 23-2010- 000 -00 ART WORK SOLD 23 -2010- 000 -00 ART WORK SOLD 23 -2010- 000 -00 ART WORK SOLD - _23 -2010- 000 -00 ART WORK SOLD ARTWORK SOLD ART WORK SOLD ART WORK -SOLD_ ART WORK SOLD 009718 12/29/88 123.55 GARLINGHOUSE_�_ ART WORK SOLD 23 -2010- 000 -00 23 -2010- 000 -00 23 -2010- 000 -00 23 -2010- 000 -00 23 -2010- 000 -DO 23 -2010- 000 -00 IL 4. , -- _ -.. -_ - 14f,I _ :40I 5,�� 1541 _e1 ,6 e6� 25.20 s �I?nl 009709 12/29/88 80.50 BETTY PEDDIE 3c9 - -- - - - - -- -- b JJ 009710 12/29/88 53.08 .53.08 IMAGES OF CHILDHOOD 341 VJ° 009711 12/29/88 SHARON MCKISSON _161.00 161.00 J' 009712 12/29/88 55.50 CAROL_MEIDLINGER 40 55.50 s a, z 009713 12/29/88 63..00 BARBARA LUNDGREN 63.06 «- - -- <- 009714 12/29/88 _ - KRYSTAL LEEBRICK -- - -- 46 28.00 * �48 009715 12/29/88 28.00_ DONNA LA PORTE - 49 v so 71 009716 12/29/88 -- - _._ 52.50 DOROTHY HALL - 52' _ 52.50 r 53 54 009717 12/29/88 87.78 A GRIMSBY-------. ;;' -- 87.78 --NN_ * - - - -- 56 C ART WORK SOLD _ _ - 23-2010- 000 -00 ART WORK SOLD 23 -2010- 000 -00 ART WORK SOLD 23 -2010- 000 -00 ART WORK SOLD - _23 -2010- 000 -00 ART WORK SOLD ARTWORK SOLD ART WORK SOLD ART WORK -SOLD_ ART WORK SOLD 009718 12/29/88 123.55 GARLINGHOUSE_�_ ART WORK SOLD 23 -2010- 000 -00 23 -2010- 000 -00 23 -2010- 000 -00 23 -2010- 000 -00 23 -2010- 000 -DO 23 -2010- 000 -00 IL 4. , -- _ -.. -_ - 14f,I _ :40I 5,�� 1541 _e1 ,6 e6� l H 11 1989 C1 iF EDINA CHECK R. ,rER 01 -09 -89 4G. E CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 9 P.O. • MESSAGE z 123.55 » 'I 3 009719 12/29/88 70.00 SUSAN FRAME ART WORK SOLD — _ 23- 2010 - 000 -00 4 70.00 » � e 009720 12/2988 50.00 GLEN SIPE PIANO PROF SERVICES 30 -2010- 000 =40 - - -- 881227 8468 qI- • ^� 50.00 » °I 009721 12/29/88 37.28 CORNER MARKING CO SIGNS 27 -2010- 000 -00 6814 8002 "i 37.28 » 009722 12/29/88 258.89 ESTATE OF AMBULANCE DUP PMT 10- 2010 = 000 =00 '4 258.89 » 009723 12/29/88 12,000.00 CITY OF WOODBURY DUES 10- 4204 - 140 -14 12,000.00 'i 009725 - 12/30/88 - - - 99.00 SOURCECOM TRAINING TAPES 10- 2010- 000 -00 39215 22i -- - - -- - 99.00 » 24� 009726 12/30/88 95.00 CAREER TRACK SEMINAR FEE 10 -4202- 440 -44 ;, - -- - -- 95.00 -s— - - -- - - -- - - -- - - - - -- - - -- - -- - 009727 -__ ___ -,_ 100.00 FMAM BOOKS 10- 4650- 440 -44 zo' - -- ____12130/88__ 100.00 L 3o 009728 12/30/88 230.00 FMAM REGISTRATION FEE 1, 0-4e02-440-44 11 230. -00 -y - - - -- -- - - -- --_ - -- - - - - -- - _.- -- - - - - -- -- 331 009729 12/30/88_ _ - 140`,00. - MN STATE FIRE DUES 1 0- 4204 - 440 -44 - 009730 12/30/88 37.14 WILLIAM HANSEN SLEDGE f0 -2010- 000 -00 37.14 » \ 79 009731 12/30/88 60.00 ISFSI - -- - - --- — RENEWAL DUES - -- -- - - -- - - - 10- 4204 - 440 -44 -- - - - -- - -- - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- 4J60.00 » • 4, 009732 12/30/88 75.75 NFPA MEMBERSHIP DUES 10- 4204 - 440 -44 41 - -- - -- -- --- - - - - -- 75.75 i - - -- - - - - - -- -.. _ — - -- - - - -- - - -- -- - - - - -- - - -- - - - -- .� 441 45 009733 12/30/88 100_.00 LAKE COUNTRY CHAPTER - SEMINAR FEE _ -_-- - -. _ _ --" —. _--- '10 -4202- 440 -44 .-- '-- ._ -. --- — '-�- _-- _-- -- - -.- 46 -- -- -- - 100.00 • n,: • 97 48 009734 12/30/88 58.07 RUTH SCHMOLL— PETTY CASH_ 10 -2010- 000 -00 491 - -- 58 . 07 _ • -- — S,{ 0.09735 01/03/89 3,835,00_ DEAN BERRY ASSO _ PERSONNEL .. . - -'- - - 10- 2010 - 000 -00 - - - -- .__ -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - -- - - -- ... 52, 3.835.00 » i •I54! '71 009736 01/03/89 115.00 CREATIVE VISUALS OFFICE SUPPLYS 30 -2010- 000 -00 8499 F! — - -- -- - -- -- -- - -- -- -- — - -- — - - M737 _ _ ._ _ 83.01 TANDY LEATHER CO. SUPPLYS 10-2010-000-00 8180 v 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 01 -09 -89 PAGE 3 i _ _ CHECK NO.. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE Itl _ 009737 01/03/89 64.65 TANDY LEATHER CO. SUPPLYS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 8180 147.66 + _ 009738 01/03/89 109.20 BANNERS TO GO BANNERS 10- 2010- 000 -00 8506 109.20 s - 7 a +'^ 009739 01/03/89 153.40 WUNDER KLEIN DONOHUE REPAIR PARTS 10 -2010- 000 -00 8059 153.40 • 009740 01/03/89 21.20 D &D SPEEDOMETER PARTS 10 -2010- 000 -00 7991 009740 _ 01/03/89 _ 21.20 D &D SPEEDOMETER PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 7991 009740 01/03/89 21.20- D &D SPEEDOMETER PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 7991 21.20 s 009741 01/03/89 433.12 WIENS METAL PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 10 -2010- 000 -00 8230 433.12 s 'f 009742 01!03/89 221.70 PLANT EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 40- 2010- 000 -00 8324 221.70 s . I=' 009743 01/03/89 61.65 MIDWAY IND SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010- 000 -00 8236 � _+ 61.65 • - -- -- _ • *• -CKS '- 009745_ - 01/03/89 274.00 PRESTO CLEANING CLEANING RUG 27 -2010- 000 -00 8489 274.00 + _ 009746 01/03/89 32.20 ED MCDEVITT CO PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 - - - 8134 -- 32.20 • 009747 _01/03/89_ -_ __.._ _____111.19 _ ALS BLMGTON VACUUM REAPIR VACUUM 27- 2010 - 000 -00 8463 _ 111.19 s 009748 01/03/89 30.00 HELGESON PRESS INC REPAIR.PARTS 40 -2010- 000 -00 8228 -i 009748 01/03/89 38.00 HELGESON PRESS INC REPAIR PARTS 40 -2010- 000 -00 8228 009748 01/03/89 38.00- HELGESON PRESS INC REPAIR PARTS 40- 2010 - 000 -00 8228 009748 _ 30.00- HELGESON PRESS INC REPAIR PARTS 40- 2010 - 803 -80 8228 i 009748 01/03/89 30.00 HELGESON PRESS INC REPAIR PARTS 40 -2010- 803 -80 8228 30.00 + I. �I 009749 01/03/89 92.00 SUSAN FRAME COST OF COMM 23 -2010- 000 -00 92.00 s 6� 009750 01/03/89 60.00 NORMA HANLON SERVICES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 60.00 s 009751 01/03/89 215.98 MOORE NALT SERV SERVICE CONTRACT 10- 2010- 000 -00 30 3' 215.98 • • 009752 01/03/89 33.70 JOSEPH STRUZYK FIRST AID SUPPLY 10 -2010- 000 -00 3� 33.70 s • 0097 -- 01/03/89 241.20 HENN CTY DEPT OF POSTAGE 10 -2010- 000 -00 l 241.20 • • h® ! �J 1989 C. iF EDINA CHECK R. fER 01 -09 -89 .E 4 CHECK N0: DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE I' 009754 01/03/89 _ 6,537.00 AMM DUES 10- 4204 - 140 -14 ; 4 6,537.00 « 009755 01/03/89 140.00 GREAT WORKS GRASS CUTTING 10- 2010 - 000 -00 +,i 140.00 • - - -- - - - - - --- - -_ - - -- -- -- -- - - --- • 009756 _- 01/03/89 _ 38.25 OSWALD FIRE HOSE REPAIRS _ 10 -2010- 000 -00 8523 38.25 » 009757 01/03/89 2,842.25 HENN CTY TREAS SERVICES 10 -2010- 000 -00 - -- -- - 2,842.2S r 009758 01/03/89 - 365.95 ROGER OLWIN CLOTHING' ALLOW 10 -2010- 000 -00 - g 365.95 « 009759 01/03/89 100.00 IACP DUES 10- 2010- 000 -00 100.00 -« - - - - - - -- -- - - - -- -- - -- - -- • 2_I 21 009760_ 01/03/89- 62.77 CRAIG WERNESS MILEAGE 10- 2010 - 000 -00 _ _-- _, -__- 62.77 _ r _ _ •12 009761 01/03/89 51.30 POLICE DEPT GEN SUPPLY 10 -2010- 000 -00 009761 0003/89 50.19 POLICE DEPT MEETING EXP 10 -2010- 000 -00 •I =� 009761 01/03/89 82.95 POLICE DEPT MILEAGE 10 -2010- 000 -00 • 271 009761 01/03/89 11.63 POLICE DEPT PRINTING 10 -2010- 000 -00 . 'a 009761 01/03/89 61.64 POLICE DEPT CABLE TV 10 -2010- 000 -00• •29I 009761 01/03/89 11.45 POLICE DEPT AMMO 10- 2010 - 000 -00 • 3=. 009761 01/03/89 POLICE DEPT GEN SUPPLYS 10 -2010- 000 -00 _126.02 395.18 32I • �I• 13 r » » » »» rrr -CKS , 009A01 01/03/89 276.25 3M CO MATERIAL 10 -2010- 000 -00 18313 8144 276.25 « 000-CKS 4D; 009A05 12/29/88 90.00 ARTSCAPE ADVERTISING 23 -2010- 000 -00 90.00 « 41, rr »rr» rrr —CKS ® A4I • d3 00.9A22_ 12/30/88 -___— 695.60 AIR COMFORT INC. HEATER 40- 2010 - 000 -00 32439 8046 -- 695.60 « IS r » » » »» rrr -CKS ty'1i 009A39 01/03/89 133.14 ALTERNATOR REBUILD BATTERIES 10 -2010- 000 -00 1621 8331 - -- - - -- - -- - - - - -- - - - -- - - 133.14 -- -- --- - - - - -- - - - - -_ - 52 73 rrr-CKS 34 009A49 12/30%88 41.61 AMERICAN LINEN - LAUNDRY 10-2010-000-00-051227- — - - - -- - •54 157 009A49 12/29/88 22.49 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50 -2010- 000 -00 761219 I 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ,, 1 009A49 12/'2'9/88 19.12 AMERICAN LINEN TOWELS �' 009A49 12/29/88 32.82 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY I, 01/03/89 7.68 116.04 « INC. OFFICE SUPPLYS 009830 01/03/89 25.00 BERTELSON BROS. * « « « «« FILES 009830 12/29/88 21.72 BERTELSON 009A53 01/03/89 107.65 AMERICAN SHARECOM 01/03/89 19.17 BERTELSON 107.65 « GEN SUPPLYS ^' 009830 01/03/89 34.80 BERTELSON BROS. 009A80 01/03/89 10.40 ASTLEFORD INTL 68.18 009A80 01/03/89 53.20 ASTLEFORD INTL 009B42 63.60 345.90 t Volk- * « « « «# - °� 009842 01/03/89 6.68 009805 12/29/88 24.12 BACH -BILL 009805 12/29/88 13.77 BACH -BILL 1=' 009805 12/29/88 25.00 BACH -BILL 009805 12/29/88 24.30 BACH -BILL 009805 12/30/88 11.54 BACH -BILL 009805 01/03/89 26.00 BACH -BILL 009805 12/30/88 30.00 BACH -BILL 009B05 12/30/88 2.00 BACH -BILL 009B05 01/03/89 54.00 BACH -BILL 210.73 « I, « « «r «« -- - -- -- - - - - -- - - - - -- -- - -- '- - - JI' �, " 009813 01/03/89 430.00 BARR ENGINEERING 009B13 - - 12/29/88 - 1,420.50 BARR ENGINEERING 1,850.50 « « « « « «« TELEPHONE PARTS PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES SHOW SUPPLIES POSTAGE OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES EXP GENERAL SUPPLIES POSTAGE EXP CONSTRUCTION STRMWATER ANALYSIS W "I 009830 01/03/89 7.68 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLYS 009830 01/03/89 25.00 BERTELSON BROS. INC. FILES 009830 12/29/88 21.72 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES till "'I 009B30 01/03/89 19.17 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GEN SUPPLYS ^' 009830 01/03/89 34.80 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GEN SUPPLYS 009830 12/30/88 68.18 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES WII -I 176.55 * !< * * «« «« 10 -2010- 000 -00 4p * ** -CKS e er ..,I 8428 10- 2010- 000 -00 8428 * ** -CKS 30- 2010 - 000 -00 009832 01/03/89_ 14.54 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS 30 -2010- 000 -00 009832 _ 12/30/88 133.25 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS Wi", 009B32 01/03/89 155.00 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS �+ 302.79 « 009B42 01%03%89 345.90 BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY - °� 009842 01/03/89 6.68 BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY L� KEYS KEYS /LOCKS LOCKS SUPPLYS OFFICE SUPPLYS 01 -09 -89 PAGE 5 ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. 9 MESSAGE 50 -2010- 000 -00 351222 50 -2010- 000 -00 061219 * ** -CKS 27 -2010- 000 -00 41- 2010 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS 10 -2010- 000 -00 10- 2010- 000 -00 10- 2010- 000 -00 430023 10 -2010- 000 -00 _10- 2010 - 000 -00 30 -2010- 000 -00 430193 8491 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 87980 8147 10- 2010- 000 -00 87691 8052 27 -2010- 000 -00 8467 10 -2010- 000 -00 30- 2010- 000 -00 8500 * ** -CKS 10 -2010- 000 -00 4p * ** -CKS e 10- 2010- 000 -00 8428 10- 2010- 000 -00 8428 * ** -CKS 30- 2010 - 000 -00 30- 2010- 000 -00 30 -2010- 000 -00 30 -2010- 000 -00 30- 2010 - 000 -00 w 30- 2010 - 000 -00 30- 2010 - 000 -00 30 -2010- 000 -00 e 30 -2010- 000 -00 * ** -CKS 27 -2010- 000 -00 41- 2010 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS 10 -2010- 000 -00 10- 2010- 000 -00 10- 2010- 000 -00 430023 10 -2010- 000 -00 _10- 2010 - 000 -00 30 -2010- 000 -00 430193 8491 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 87980 8147 10- 2010- 000 -00 87691 8052 27 -2010- 000 -00 8467 10 -2010- 000 -00 30- 2010- 000 -00 8500 I -1 it 1989 C OF EDINA CHECK 1 ;TER 01 -09 -89 eE 6 `I CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE 352.58 » 4� r « « « «« PP» -CKS 1 009B81 01/03/89 31208.00 BRW INC. PRO SERVICES 27 -2010- 000 -00 -- - - -- — - -- - - --- - - - -- 3,208.00 • - - - - - _ - - - - - -- - -- - - - -- • « «« -CKS • " 009B94 01/03/89 14.52 BUSINESS MACHINES OFFICE SUPPLYS 10 -2010- 000 -00 14.52 » • ' ^� « » « «a« » »« -CKS I'a 009B96 12/29/88 305.32 BUSINESSLAND INC. COMPUTER EQUIP 25- 2010- 000 -00 59051 8192 • ',I 305.32 » - -- - ,ni » « «a «« — - - -- - - -- - - - __ - - -- - -- -- - - --- - -- — - » »« -CKS - 009CO7 12/29/88 1,325.75 CARGILL INC. SALT 10 -2010- 000 -00 600185 7438 zz - - -- - - - - -- - -- - - -- - - - - - ---- _.1,325.75 - - - -- - - -- -- - a,l » » «a «« » »« -CKS • • 009CO9 12/29/88 295.65 CARLSON PRINTING GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 43284 "1 295.65 !! = ^I «a « «a« »»» -CKS • 009C14 12/29/88 215.88 CASWELL EQUIPMENT TARGET CABLE 29 =2010- 000 -00 022171 8451 - .z� 31 ««« -CKS 009C25 12/29/88 _ 14.04 CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO ADVERTISING 30 -2010- 000 -00 92820 8825 14.04 » ip ©I, » »« -CKS n, 009C33 12/29/88 741.07 CITY OF EDINA WATER 30- 2010- 000 -00 741.07 » !y° 009C34 12/29/88 71.90 CITY OF RICHFIELD NSP -LIFT STATION 41 -2010- 000 -00 79034 ^5 71 .90 » nt `,^7 »s » » »» »»» -CKS ,a 009C60 01/03%89 457.64 CONSTR FASTENING SYS REPAIR PARTS 10 -2010- 000 -00 8224 - -- - -- - • 009C60 01/03/89 38.00 CONSTR FASTENING SYS TOOL REPAIR 10 -2010- 000 -00 8445 495.64 « 52 • ,�i » » »s »» »»»-CKS 009C75 01/03 /889 22.95 COURTNEY WAYNE C MILEAGE 10- 2010 - 000 =00 - - 22.95 - s7 -- - - -- - - -- » - - - - -- 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 01 -09 -89 PAGE 7 �Y v CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. M MESSAGE I+ * ** -CKS - 009C92 01/03/89 254.50 CUSTOM FIRE APP REPAIRS 10 -2010- 000 -00 8429 254.50 + -- « « « »» « * «* -CKS 1p 009003 12/29/88 104.02 D d V SALES GENERAL SUPPLIES 30 -2010- 000 -00 34286 8363 009D03 01/03/89 722.50 D d V SALES GEN SUPPLYS 30 -2010- 000 -00 8498 009DO3 01/03/89 722.50 D & V SALES GEN SUPPLYS 30- 2010 - 782 -78 8498 009DO3 01/03/89 722.50- D d V SALES GEN SUPPLYS 30 -2010- 782 -78 8498 826.52 * .. * »» -CKS 009DO7 12/29/88 35.22- 0. C. HEY CO. SERVICE CONTRACT 30- 4288 - 781 -78 090227 8475 009DO7 12/29/88 35.22 0. C. HEY CO. SERVICE CONTRACT 30-4288- 781 -78 090227 8475 009007 12/29/88 35.22 D. C. HEY CO. SERVICE CONTRACT 30- 4288 - 781 -78 090227 8475 - _ - 35.22 * ** -CKS 009E14 01/03/89 2,549.58 EARL F. ANDERSON EQUIP MAINT 10- 2010- 000 -00 5352 r 2,549.58 * e * * « » »» * »* -CKS 009E20 12/30/88 85.00 ECOLAB PEST ELIM. SERVICE CONTRACT - 30 -2010- 000 -00 - - - - -- 94048 8459 - I,. - - -- — — - - -- - - -- - -- 85.00 * - 009E23 12/30/88 39.00 ECONOMIC PRESS RENEWAL 10 -4204- 440 -44 e 39.00 009E37 12/29/88 160.75 EDINA FOUNDATION ART WORK SOLD 23 -2010- 000 -00 ��• +'I 160.75 «ts *ee - -- - - -- - - - _ «** -CKS 009E71_-_- 01/03/89 _ _ 29.8G ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY SUPPLY 10- 2010- 000 -00 103301 8300 29.86 *** -CKS 009E75 01/03/89 230.00 EMPLOYEES CLUB SUPPLYS 10- 4504 - 500 -50 230.00 » * ** -CKS 009F11 12/29/88 1,369.06 FEED RITE CONTROL WATER CHEMICALS 40 -2010- 000 -00 114936 7583 +I,,� 1,369.06 I 1989 C: T EDANA CHECK R, fER 01 -09 —S9 E 8 ;mil J . i CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 9 P.O. M MESSAGE ss» -CKS t 009G24 01/03/89 19.00 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS RENTAL 10 -4226- 301 -30 °I 009G24 01/03/89 266.25 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS RADIO SERVICE 10- 4294 - 560 -56 - »ss -CKS 009632 01/03/89 50.85 GENUINE PARTS CO. TRANS KIT 10- 2010 - 000 -00 8430 " 009G32 01/03/89 53.45 GENUINE PARTS CO. PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 8219 _ - - ---- - - - - -- -- - 104.30 - - -- - - -- - - - -- - -- - - *00-CKS 009G42 01/03/89 156.00 GIL HEBARD GUNS TARGETS 29 -2010- 000 -00 8374 156.00 » » »ss »» •ss -CKS 22 009G68 12/30/88 88.76 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. PARTS 10- 2010- 000 -00 741525 8323 009G68 12/30/88 61.45 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. PARTS 10 -2010- 000 -00 742096 8328 009668 12/30/88 122.84 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 741528 8322 009G68 _ __ 12/30/88 29.19 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. PARTS 10-2010-000-00-743412 8341 - 302.24 2]; » »»-CKS 009692 12/29/88 24.50 GUSTAFSON -KATHY ART WORK SOLD, __ 24 .50 * - - - _ - -- - — — - - » »s » »» + +s -CKS 009H15 12/29/88 71.40 HANLON -NORMA ART WORK SOLD 23 -2010- 000 -00 =' 71.40 + a* ^I »ssass ss» -CKS f 009H28 01/03/89 255.43 HAYDEN- MURPHY EQUIP PARTS 10 -2010- 000 -00 22458 8446 a2 255.43 • a,�- - -. -- -- - - -- -- -. - . - - - -- - - -- — - - - y»• -CKS -- s » » » »� - - - -- -- - - - - -- "- $ aa� a5l__009H31 12/29/88 _ -59.50 HAYWA- PHYLLIS ART WORK SOLD 23 -2010- 000 -00 - - _ 59.50 • 047 ^° 009H32 12/30/88 247.98 HEDGES =DIANA CONTRACTUAL EQUIP 23 -2010- 000 -00 247.98 _ M — _ — — — — — o**-CKS 52 009J35 01/03/89 52.00 JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING 23- 2010 - 000 -00 54 009J35 01/03/89 21.25 JERRYS PRINTING_ ADVERTISING 50 -2010- 000 -00 009,335 01/03/89 21.25 _ _ ___ _ JERRYS PRINTING _ ADVERTISING _ 50- 2010 - 000 -00- - — - - -- - — - �- 009J35 01/03/89 21.27 JERRYS PRINTING ADVERTISING 50 -2010- 000 -00 1 r 3f•I * #PP #* r WOOD FOR GUN RANGE REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS SUPPLIES HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLY MATERIAL PAYMENT PARTS BOLTS PARTS BOLTS SUPPLYS SUPPLYS BOLTS REPAIR PARTS BOLTS BRASS ELECTRODES 01 -09 -89 PAGE 9 ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. # MESSAGE 23 -2010- 000 -00 23- 2010 - 000 -00 23 -2010- 000 -00 23 -2010- 000 -00 23 -2010- 000 -00 10- 2010- 000 -00 654120 8140 10 -2010- 000 -00 1989 CITY OF EDINA 242.322 CHECK REGISTER 8325 10- 2010- 000 -00 CHECK-N0, DATE_ AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION (i 8133 40- 2010 - 000 -00 115.77 P 009K35 01/03/89 I' KNOX LUMBER CO. 009k35 •01/03/89 54.97 KNOX LUMBER CO. 009J66 12/29/88 36.13 JOHNSON -NAOMI OFFICE SUPPLIES 009J66 _ 12/29/88 32.70 JOHNSON -NAOMI CRAFT SUPPLIES I' 009J66 12/29/88 9.54 JOHNSON -NAOMI GENERAL SUPPLIES 12/29/88 009J66 12/29/88 _ 8.00 JOHNSON -NAOMI MODEL FEE 45.05 009J66 12/29/88 50.00 JOHNSON -NAOMI ADVERTISING I 136.37 'i 009K63 171.51 KUSTOM ELECTRONICS M 009k09 01/03/89 242.32 KAMAN BEARING 6 SPLY PARTS r 3f•I * #PP #* r WOOD FOR GUN RANGE REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS SUPPLIES HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLY MATERIAL PAYMENT PARTS BOLTS PARTS BOLTS SUPPLYS SUPPLYS BOLTS REPAIR PARTS BOLTS BRASS ELECTRODES 01 -09 -89 PAGE 9 ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. # MESSAGE 23 -2010- 000 -00 23- 2010 - 000 -00 23 -2010- 000 -00 23 -2010- 000 -00 23 -2010- 000 -00 10- 2010- 000 -00 654120 8140 10 -2010- 000 -00 8243 10- 2010 - 000 -00 242.322 P 8325 10- 2010- 000 -00 446326 8350 10 -2010- 000 -00 8321 I: 438817 8386 40- 2010 - 000 -00 8133 40- 2010 - 000 -00 7969 009K35 01/03/89 53.11 KNOX LUMBER CO. 009k35 •01/03/89 54.97 KNOX LUMBER CO. _ 009K35 01/03/89 54.68 KNOX LUMBER CO. 009k35 12/30/88 22.91 KNOX LUMBER CO. 009K35 01/03/89 10.41 KNOX LUMBER CO. =' 009K35 12/29/88 25.11 KNOX LUMBER CO. 009K35 01/03/89 45.05 KNOX LUMBER CO. - - _ 266.24 I 'i 009K63 171.51 KUSTOM ELECTRONICS 171.51 # r, 009L04_____­_01/03/e9 106.24 LAHASS CORPORATION 106.24 009L28 01/03/89 74.80 LAWSON PRODUCTS 009L28 01/03/89 61.17 LAWSON PRODUCTS _ 009L28 01/03/89 _ 57.08 LAWSON PRODUCTS ^ 009L28 01/03/89 188.77 LAWSON PRODUCTS 009L28 01/03/89 _ - .-- _ - -___ 175.80 LAWSON PRODUCTS -- 009L'28 -- 01/03/89 81.77 LAWSON PRODUCTS r 009L28 01/03/89 277.84 LAWSON PRODUCTS 009L28 01/03/89 200.77 LAWSON PRODUCTS _ -_ 1 , 118.00 r' rls�� 009L30 12/29/88 100.00 LAYNE MINNESOTA CO 100.00 r 3f•I * #PP #* r WOOD FOR GUN RANGE REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS SUPPLIES HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLY MATERIAL PAYMENT PARTS BOLTS PARTS BOLTS SUPPLYS SUPPLYS BOLTS REPAIR PARTS BOLTS BRASS ELECTRODES 01 -09 -89 PAGE 9 ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. # MESSAGE 23 -2010- 000 -00 23- 2010 - 000 -00 23 -2010- 000 -00 23 -2010- 000 -00 23 -2010- 000 -00 10- 2010- 000 -00 654120 8140 10 -2010- 000 -00 8243 10- 2010 - 000 -00 8342 10 -2010- 000 -00 8325 10- 2010- 000 -00 446326 8350 10 -2010- 000 -00 8321 28- 2010 - 000 -00 438817 8386 40- 2010 - 000 -00 8133 10 -2010- 000 -00 10 -2010- 000 -00 2712 8247 10 -2010- 000 -00 8121 10- 2010- 000 -00 8124 10 -2010- 000 -00 7972 10- 2010 - 000 -00 7971 10 -2010- 000 -00 8123 40- 22010- 000 -00 8441 40- 2010- 000 -00 8122 40- 2010 - 000 -00 7969 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 40 -2010- 000 -00 10641 8343 * ** -CKS 'f * ** —CKS t I� 1989 C JF EDINA CHECK F ,TER 01 -09 -89 ;E 10 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. i P.O. a MESSAGE l z 009L34 12/29/88 11.40 LEEF BROS. INC. TOWELS 27 -2010- 000 -00 - 709378 ` 11 .40 f• 5 e tttttt *** —CKS -ld 009L82 01/03/89 37.36 LYNDALE HARDWARE GEN SUPPLYS 30- 2010 - 000 -00 8492 • 37.36 - "","� *11111 * ** —CKS • 009402 01/03/89 8.62 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. PARTS 10 -2010- 000 -00 90850 8038 ^" 8.62 * • o tttttt ***—CKS 009M22 01/03/89 158.40 MCNEILUS STEEL STEEL 57852 7895 009422 01/03%89 320.11 MCNEILUS STEEL _ _ STEEL -----l0-20i0-000-00 10 -2010- 000 -00 S8115 8225 478.51 * _ • =11 stttxt - tt* -CKS 009425 12/30/88 27.14 MED OXYGEN 3 EQUIP OXYGEN 10 -2010- 000 -00 620280 = 009425 12/30/88 84.22 MED OXYGEN 6 EQUIP AIR & 02 10- 2010 - 000 -00 S70120 d�^ 111.36 t 127 *** -CKS 009M27 01/03/89 437.25 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANER 10 -2010- 000 -00 20659 8233 -- - - 009427 --- - -- 01/03!89 - - 352.05 - MERIT SUPPLY SUPPLY 10 -2010- 000 -00 20658 -821S-- - E�'I 009M27 01/03/89 263.90 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLY 10 -2010- 000 -00 20622 8148 009M27_— _12/29/88 _ 499.00 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 2010 - 000 -00 20670 8370 I=' 009M27 12/29/88 204.75 MERIT SUPPLY PAINT 40- 2010 - 000 -00 20690 8235 ` 1,756.95 • I.� *1111* -- -- - - - -- - - -- - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- -- - t ** -CKS - 'I - 8 009M3 12/29/88 220,257. -78_- MET WASTE CON COMM SEWER SERVICE - -- - 40- 4312 - 812 -80 - - -- - - -- 6209 - cod 220,2S7.78 * "u2 *t *ttt * ** —CKS 009M41 12/29/88 221.59 MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO. CONCESSION GOODS 28- 2010 - 000 -00 28241 8355 -- - - - - - -- - - - -- ------------------- 221.59 �' tttttt *** —CKS E nl 009M44 120.48 MIDWEST CHEM SUPPLY -POLY LINERS 10- 2010- 000 -00 23456 8407 — - -- 12/30/88 �, o, 120.48 ~'� 12 * * *tt* t ** -CKS �G \. 009M46 01/03/8_9 3.19 METZ BAKING CO BREAD 27 -2010- 000 -00 'f * ** —CKS t 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 01 -09 -89 PAGE 11 l CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. Y MESSAGE �(.I ? 009M68 01/03/89 31.40 MN. CELLULAR TEL. PHONE SERVICE 10- 2010 - 000 -00 ' 009M68 12/30/88 178.86 MN. CELLULAR TEL. MOBILE PHONE 10- 2010 - 000 -00 807727 009M68 01/03/89 119.85 MN. CELLULAR TEL. PHONE SERVICE 10- 2010 - 000 -00 009M68 01/03/89 25.20 MN. CELLULAR TEL. PHONE SERVICE 10 -2010- 000 -00 009M68 01/03/89 20.25 MN. CELLULAR TEL. PHONE SERVICE 10- 2010 - 000 -00 ` 009M68 01/03/89 141.38 MN. CELLULAR TEL. PHONE SERVICES 10 -2010- 000 -00 ^; 009M68 - 01/03/89 41.20 MN. CELLULAR TEL. PHONE SERVICE 10- 2010- 000 -00 i' 558.14 + » «ss «« + ++ -CKS 009M70 12/30/88 179.70 MN. CONWAY SUSPENDERS 10 -2010- 000 -00 10741 179.70 » `171 +sss +s + ++ -CKS _ In 009M80 0 1/03/89 20.87 MN. SUBURBAN NEWS ADVERTISING 10 -2010- 000 -00 20.87 » 121 009M81 12/29/88 300.90 MN. TORO INC. MOWER PARTS 27- 2010 - 000 -00 736716 7939 300.90 + + ++ -CKS 009N13 12/29/88 40.23 MUZAK ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 822 -82 508901 = 009N13 _ 12/29/88 _ 40.23 MUZAK ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 862 -86 508901 �- 80.46 + „i - ys »ss -- - - - - -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - -- - + »+ =CKS 009N22 01/03/89 473.99 NATL GUARDIAN SYS. ALARM 27- 4304 - 662 -66 I 009N22 009N 22 01/03/89 01/03/89 151.32 175.98 NATL GUARDIAN SYS. NATL GUARDIAN SYS. ALARM SERVICE ALARM SERVICES 50- 4304 - 821 -82 50 -4304- 861 -86 801.29 + + ++ -CKS X 009N48 12/29/88 106.77 NO STAR TURF MOWER PARTS 27- 2010 - 000 -00 10174 8391 �? 009N48 12/29/88 32.40 NO STAR TURF GRINDING COOLANT 27 -2010- 000 -00 10154 8185 ^ 139,17-o + ++ -CKS ft 009NSO 01/03/89 59.04 NO STAR WATERWORKS FLARE NUTS 40 -2010- 000 -00 3001 8227 ,7 59.04 + a,, - • +spa w - - -- - - +++ -CKS vs', 009017 12/30/88 _ _ 4,453.00 J OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPUTER FOR KEN 10 -2010- 000 -00 52963 8408 52I 009017 12/30/88 202.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 2010- 000 -00 67593 8290 '. `3 5^ 4,655.00 » -- - -- - -- - - » +r-CKS 5ft \�7_ 009048 12/30/88 _ 36.20 ORR SAFETY EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS __ 10 -2010- 000 -00 119321 8170 _ _ _ i t -ij 1989 C JF EDINA CHECK h .TER 01 -09 -89 ;E 12 i CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 9 P.O. 6 MESSAGE -�zl 009048 12/30/88 388.71 ORR SAFETY EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 119268 8202 • 009048_ _ 12/30/88_ _ _ _ _ 220.00 ORR SAFETY EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 10 -2010- 000 -00 119279 8170 009048 12/30/88 126.65 ORR SAFETY EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 119367 8170 -�' �.s 009048 12/30/88 19.96 ORR SAFETY EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 119269 8202 • c 791 .52 + i — - -- -- - www -CKS + 009P18 12/29/88 264.11 PAULSON PERSONNEL SERVICES 23- 2010 - 000 -00 ' 009P18 12 /c^ ^9/88 356.63 PAULSON ART WORK SOLD 23 -2010- 000 -00 • = 620.74 + W ww » » »» w »w —CKS • Ei 009P25 01/03/89 4,900.00 PEAK CONSTRUCTION REMODELING 10- 4201- 500 -50 8163 �.'7 4,900.00 » • ^ ww » »w» w »» —CKS ` 21 009P34 01/03/89 330.00 PERSONNEL DECISIONS SERVICES 10 -2010- 000 -00 z' 330.00 + _ - - -- - - - I23I ww» —CKS 4'I'r 009P40 12/29/88 26.40 PHOTO FAST ADVERTISING 23 -2010- 000 -00 2763 8393 • f — -- - -- — — - -- 26.40 + 11•. -o w + » » »» www —CKS W. "I 009P48 12/29/88 25.20 PIP PRINTING PRINTING 30 -2010- 000 -00 3973 - -8352 -- - 16 - 009P48 12/29/88 37.10 PIP PRINTING PRINTING 30 -2010- 000 -00 3977 3460 - -62.30 + ' I I +w» -CKS i 009P70 3,000.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 10- 4290 --510 -51 - - - - 12/29/88 E�-3,000.00 + - - -- w »w -CKS ^z� 009022 12/30/88 49.85 QUIK PRINT PRINTING 27 -2010- 000 -00 15140 8482 ,,. - - -- - 49.85 I f11 www »w+ www -CKS 009831 01/03/89 23.74 RETAIL DATA SYS MN OFFICE SUPPLYS 30- 2010 - 000 -00 8503 nni 23.74 + ;� wwwww» www -CKS '- s;l 009R49 01/03/89 190.05 ROAD RESCUE HOSE 10 -2010- 000 -00 8118 s =i 190.05 w = ws��sw - -- —. - - -- -- - — — - - - - - -- — - — w»w -CKS - -- �_!. 17 _009RSI 01/03/89 149.77 —RFG PET &_SUPPLY _ _�_ SUPPLYS 10 -2010- 000 -00 t�� OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 01 -09 -89 PAGE 13 I` 1989 CITY CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT-N0._ INV. Y P.O. N MESSAGE ,I 149.77 + « « « «« w**-CKS �I3 009509 01/03/89 66.95 SCHAFER EQUIP CO TOOLS 10- 2010- 000 -00 143585 8311 _ -- 66.95 * ** -CKS l 009517 01/03/89 368.53 STEWART LUMBER REPAIR PARTS 10 -2010- 000 -00 123716 8154 - - - - - - -- — 368.53 i - - -- -- -- j* * * « *« t ** -CKS °I 009519 01/03/89 290.22 SEELYE PLASTICS PLUMB SUPPLY 40- 2010- 000 -00 127651 7869 " 290.22 iF7ifiF - -- - - - - -- - - -- -- - - -. .. -- -. - - **w—CKS -- 01/03/89___ 119.20 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 10 -2010- 000 -00 10658 8223 009S27 01/03/89 64.50 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PARTS 40- 2010 - 000 -00 10617 8234 183.70 **o-CKS I?' 009S30____ 12/29/88 237.08 _ SIGN CENTRAL GENERAL SUPPLIES 30 -2010- 000 -00 63650 8470 009S30 _ 12/29/88 _ 111.84 SIGN CENTRAL GENERAL SUPPLIES 30 -2010- 000 -00 63631 8469 009530 12/29/88 102.80 SIGN CENTRAL GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 2010- 000 -00 63645 8401 009530 12/29/88 390.00 SIGN CENTRAL GENERAL SUPPLIES 30 -2010- 000 -00 63632 8466 . _ - -841 .72 * v * ## —CKS I� 009S34 12/29/88 .50 SOUTHDALE FORD PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 194550 I'= 009S34 01/03/89 4.56 SOUTHDALE FORD PARTS 10 -2010- 000 -00 _ 009S34 01/03/89 25.30 SOUTHDALE FORD PARTS 10- 2010- 000 -00 v 30 30.36 * * * « *« * ** —CKS v '2 009S45 12/29/88 3.98 ST. PAUL BOOK OFFICE SUPPLIES 27 -2010- 000 -00 891084 �'— _ 3.98 t - + *r -CKS (7 009S54 12/30/88 107.82 STAR & TRIBUNE ADVERTISING 10- 2010- 000 -00 009S54 12/30/88 149.75 STAR & TRIBUNE ADVERTISING 10 -2010- 000 -00 " __ 009S54 12/29/88 _ _ 96.53 STAR d TRIBUNE ADVERTISING 23- 2010 - 000 -00 8394 ^i 3S4.10 v J; -- -------------- ---- ._...__. _ # ## -CKS ' 009S69 01/03/89 54.00 STRAUGHAN HARDWARE PARTS 40 -2010- 000 -00 1832 8069 -- 54.00 v 3a 17 * *r -CKS ! -, CHECK R VENDOR STREICHERS STREICHERS SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP 1989 C JF EDINA 01 -09 -89 ;E 14 �I SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE EMER LIGHT CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 009S72 01/03/89 184.25 PARTS 009572 01/03/89 402.50 PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 PARTS 586.7S » » # # » ## 009577 01/03/89 16.53 009577 01/03/89 11.89 f 009577 01/03/89 11.89 009577 01/03/89 16.53- 009577 01/03/89 16.53 rt� 40.31 » # 009578 01/03/89 304.62 CHECK R VENDOR STREICHERS STREICHERS SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP PARTS 40 -2010- 000 -00 397252 8314 009578 TER 01 -09 -89 ;E 14 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE EMER LIGHT 10 -2010- 000 -00 56254 7805 SIREN SPEAKER 10- 2010- 000 -00 56175 8444 PARTS 10 -2010- 000 -00 PARTS 10 -2010- 000 -00 PARTS 10 -2010- 000 -00 4 PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 i PARTS 40 -2010- 000 -00 397252 8314 009578 01/03/89 482.51 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP PLUMB SUPPLY 40 -2010- 000 -00 393287 8076 787.13 fi » #» —CKS 009592 01/03/89 182.01 SYSTEM SUPPLY COMPUTER SUPPLYS 10 -2010- 000 -00 8493 $0 182.01 # 4 » »» —CKS fill �. 009T05 12/29/88 16.49 TAYSTEE BAKING CO. CONCESSION GOODS 28 -2010- 000 -00 8359 16.49 # a; 4 # » »s #r » »» —CKS Qa 009T11 12/29/88 28.50 TESSMAN SEED 6 CHEM. SOD 6 BLACK DIRT 30 -2010- 000 -00 151815 8380 t 28.50 » # # #k »» » »» —CKS l 009T14 01/03/89 321.12 TEXGAS CORP. FUEL 10- 2010 - 000 -00 8443 R:a 321 .12 s t » »» —CKS 009T20 12/29/88 237.00 THE PRINT SHOP PRINTING 10- 2010- 000 -00 8779 8259 - 237.00 # C. t # # # » »# » »»—CKS C. 009T26 12/30/88 30.77 THERMAL CO. PARTS 40 -2010- 000 -00 N20183 8245 t 30.77 # G # # # » ## » »» —CKS 6 009T29 01/03/89 3,098.80 THOMSEN— NYBECK LEGAL 10- 2010 - 000 -00 009T29 01/03/89 11,395.57 THOMSEN— NYBECK LEGAL 10- 2010- 000 -00 4 14,494.37 # r. '�I # ## —CKS 4 !( 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 009T40 01/03/89 154.74 TOLL COMPANY WELDING SUPPLY 009T40 12/29/88 20.19 TOLL COMPANY ACETELENE & SUPP _ s i E 174.93 + I' 009T42 _ 01/03/89 250.00 TOOLS BY OLSEN TOOL I" 009T42 01/03/89 109.45 TOOLS BY OLSEN REPAIR TOOL 359.45 + j' - - -- 009U08 12/29/88 _ 141.75 UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORMS �I -_ 141.75 + 009U14 12/30/88 23.02 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP LIGHT BULBS 23.02 s 009U25 01/03/89 237.00 UNIVERSAL MED SERV REPLACE CASES �i 237.00 + 009V30 01/03/89 287.10 VANTAGE ELECTRIC CONTR EQUIP - -- _ — — - — _ _ 287.10 + 009V43 01/03/89 9,775.00 VERSATILE VEHICLE RENTAL 9,775.00 + °j 009W08 12/30/88 111.28 W.W. GRAINGER RADIO CONTROLS 009W08 12/30/88 178.13 U.W. GRAINGER PARTS 009W08 01/03/89 493.99 W.W. GRAINGER VALVE ,� i - -- - — - 783.40 u ',I»» »sss Ij ~� 009W36 12/30/88 3.90 WEIS AM FIRE EQUIP SEALS - -- - -- - -- 3.90 + - - ,vl•,o� +r +sss 01 -09 -89 PAGE 15 �y I ACCOUNT NO.—INV. 9 P.Q. 0 MESSAGE 10 -2010- 000 -00 227625 8130 27- 2010 - 000 -00 034970 8169 - - - - srr -CKS I 10- 2010 - 000 -00 15175 8372 10 -2010- 000 -00 15120 8269 - -- - :rs -CKS 30 -2010- 000 -00 11071 2421 27 -2010- 000 -00 821484 7850 srs -CKS srs -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 8193 rrr -CKS 23 -2010- 000 -00 7926 rsr -CKS 27- 2010 - 000 -00 7417 10- 2010 - 000 -00 246393 8244 10- 2010- 000 -00 247915 8340 27 -2010- 000 -00 10- 2010 - 000 -00 026913 7256 z; 009W41 01/03/89 — 54.08 WEST PHOTO FILM SUPPLYS 10 -2010- 000 -00 8464 rrrr »s rrr -CKS + ++ -CKS so*-CKS 54.08 + - - - - -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - - - -- - - - -- - - - -- -- -- — - - -- - =- - - - -- rrr =CKS 203.30 WIDERSTROM -ANN ART WORK SOLD 23 -2010- 000 -00 l! 1989 C OF EDINA CHECK 1 ;TER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 01 -09 -89 GE 16 ACCOUNT N0. -INV. • P.O. N MESSAGE ► 3 00 r 203.30 r ° rrrrrr 46 rrr -CKS his 72,869.40 FUND 10 TOTAL 3,432.72 FUND 009W71 12/29/88 568.25 WINFIELD DEVEL. PROF SERVICES 10- 4201 - 627 -62 010435 25 TOTAL 3i -- - 15, 51 0. 15 -- 568 .25 • 27 - -- -- - 4r �; 263.19 FUND 28 TOTAL 371.88 FUND 29 �,, rrrrrr 4,123.31 FUND 30 TOTAL rrr -CKS 009Z14 01/03/89 273.17 ZIEGLER INC REPAIRS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 7733 1 , 492 .40 _I 009Z14 01/03/89 219.90- ZIEGLER INC CREDIT 10 -2010- 000 -00 8442 50 TOTR °.. 6 `�• 53.27 323,684.31 _ _ TOTAL — - rrrrrr rrr -CKS 341P70 12/30/88 12.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 10- 4290 - 510 -51 MANUAL ^i 341P70 12/30/88 12.00- POSTMASTER POSTAGE 10 -4290- 510 -51 MANUAL rrr -CKS bl� 342N16 12/30/88 23.45 NSP POWER 10- 4252 - 301 -30 MANUAL - °" 342N16 12/30/88_ 23.45- NSP POWER 10 -4252- 301 -30 MANUAL 342N16 _ 12/30/88 _ _ 12,296.50- NSP - POWER -- - 10 -4252- 321 -30 MANUAL 4,, = ^I 342N16 12/30/88 12,296.50 NSP POWER 10 -4252- 321 -30 MANUAL -�_ 342N16__.._. 12/30/88 10,492.16- NSP POWER 10 -4252- 322 -30 MANUAL 342N16 12/30/88 10,492.16 NSP POWER 10 -4252- 322 -30 MANUAL t✓'OI 34P_N16 12/30/88 2,195.08 NSP POWER 10- 4252 - 330 -30 MANUAL 342N16 12/30/88 2,195.08- NSP POWER 10- 4252- 330 -30 MANUAL 342N16 12/30/88 695.05- NSP POWER 10- 4252- 34S -30 MANUAL 342N16 12/30/88 695.05 NSP POWER 10 -4252- 345 -30 MANUAL ' 342N16 12/30/88__- _.. .106.26 NSP POWER 1'0 -4252- 358 -30 MANUAL —- 342N16 12/30/88 _ 106.26- NSP POWER 10- 4252- 358 -30 MANUAL ar=5 342N16 12/30/88 2,133.30 NSP POWER 10- 4252 - 375 -30 MANUAL ^_ 342N16 12/30/88 2,133.30- NSP POWER 10- 4252- 375 -30 MANUAL I' 34M _ 12/30/88 894.88- NSP POWER 10- 4252- 440 -44 MANUAL 342N16 12/30/88 894.88 NSP POWER 10 -4252- 440 -44 MANUAL I;° ° 342N16 44.13 - NSP POWER 10- 4252- 460 -46 MANUAL _.12/30/88 _- 342N16 __ 12/30/88 44.13 NSP _ POWER _ 10 -4252- 460 -46 MANUAL to'i 342N16 12/30/88 1,255.52 NSP POWER 10 -4252- 520 -52 MANUAL •.z1 342N16 12/30/88 11255.52- NSP POWER 10- 4252 - 520 -52 MANUAL °3, 00 r 46 72,869.40 FUND 10 TOTAL 3,432.72 FUND 23 TOTAL °0 305.32 FUND 25 TOTAL 3i -- - 15, 51 0. 15 -- - - -- FUND 27 TOTAL-- -. 4r �; 263.19 FUND 28 TOTAL 371.88 FUND 29 TOTAL, SZ 4,123.31 FUND 30 TOTAL �r 224,769.96 FUND 40 TOTAL_ ° 1 , 492 .40 FUND 41 TOT 545.96 _ _ FUND 50 TOTR °.. 6 `�• 323,684.31 _ _ TOTAL — - GENERAL FUND ART CENTER __CAPITAL FUND GOLF COURSE FUND RECREATION CENTER FUND GUN RANGE FUND _ EDINBOROUGH PARK UTILITY FUND STORM SEWER UTILITY - - LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND rrr -CKS