HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-02-21_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA
JOINT EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY /COUNCIL MEETING
EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
FEBRUARY 21, 1989
7:00 P.M.
(Convene Joint HRA /Council Meeting)
ROLLCALL
I. APPROVAL OF HRA MINUTES OF OCTOBER 3 AND 24, NOVEMBER 21, 1988
II. AUTHORIZE CENTENNIAL LAKES PHASE I UTILITIES (100% petition)
III. AUTHORIZE CONVEYANCE OF PHASE I CENTENNIAL LAKES CONDOMINIUMS
IV. ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. All agenda items marked with an asterisk (a`)
and in bold print are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one
motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Council
Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the
consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda.
II. PUBLIC HEARING AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planner. Public comment hears... Motion to close hearing.
Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires.4 /5 favorable rollcall vote
of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable
rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Final Development
Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote
required to pass.
A. Preliminary Plat Approval - Fairview Southdale Addition - BTO Development
and Fairview Southdale Hospital - Generally located east of France Avenue
and north of West 65th Street
III. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
IV. AWARD OF BIDS
* A.
Storm Sewer Improvement No.
STS -187, Storm Sewer Improvement No. STS -188,
Storm Sewer Improvement No.
STS -189
* B.
Steel Purchase
* C.
Purchase 1 ton Chevrolet truck
* D.
Purchase John Deere Mower to lowest bidder
* E'
Purchase 1/2 ton pick -up to
replace 1/2 ton pick -up
* F.
Purchase pick -up to replace
F -150 van
V. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Approval of Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of 2/14/89
B. I -494 Frontage Road Report
C. Recycling Update
D. Appointment of Assistant Weed Inspector
E. Annual Congressional City Conference (NLC) - March 11 -14, Washington DC
F. Council Responsibilities /Liaison to Boards and Commissions
G. Park Board
1. Use of Braemar Arena for Commencement Exercises
2. Senior Center Bus Use
H. Board and Commission Appointments
I. Letter from LMC Property Tax Coordinating Committee - Issues for 1989
Session
Agenda - Edina City Council
February 21, 1989
Page Two
VI. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES - Mayor Richards
A. Letter from City of Bloomington regarding Airport Expansion
VII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
VIII. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
IX. FINANCE
A.
Resolution Relating to $2,100,000 General Obligation (G.O.) Recreational
Facility Bonds, Series 1989; Authorizing Issuance and providing for Public
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
Sale Thereof
B.
Resolution Relating to $5,300,000 General Obligation (G.O.) Taxable Tax
6
.Increment Bonds, Series 1989; Authorizing Issuance and Providing for
Council Meeting
Public Sale Thereof
C.
Resolution Relating to $1,760,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds,
Thurs
Series 1989; Authorizing Issuance and Providing for Public Sale Thereof
D.
Resolution Relating to $8,425,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds,
Orientation
Series 1989; Authorizing Issuance and Providing for Public Sale Thereof
* E.
Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 1/31/89: General Fund $803,632.93,
Sat
Art Center $8,101.28, Swimming Pool Fund $24.88, Golf Course Fund
11'
$13,043.31, Recreation Center Fund $10,965.86, Gun Range Fund $451.45,
Strategic Planning
Edinborough Park $9,506.64, Utility Fund $20,877.45, Liquor Dispensary
a.m.
Fund $267,558.30, Imp. Bond Redemption #2 $59,000.00, Total $1,193,162.10
Mon
and for confirmation of payment of the following Claims dated 2/21/89:
20
General Fund $123,494.05, Art Center $2,280.96, Golf Course Fund
Council Meeting
$4,296.59, Recreation Center Fund $197,639.92, Cun Range Fund $371.26,
p.m.
Edinborough Park $12,525.24, Utility Fund $33,352.17, Storm Sewer Utility
$1,025.21, Liquor Dispensary Fund $100,657.67, Construction Fund
$5,739.31, Total $481,382.38.
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
/EVENTS
Mon
Mar
6
Regular
Council Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council Room
Thurs
Mar
9
Council
Orientation
1:30
p.m.
Mgr. Conference Room
Sat
Mar
11'
Coijncil
Strategic Planning
Retreat 8:30
a.m.
to 3:00 p.m.
Mon
Mar
20
Regular
Council Meeting
7 :00
p.m.
Council Room
MINUTES
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
OCTOBER 3, 1988
Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner'and Courtney.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT
FOR BIDS FOR GRADING IMPROVEMENT NO. C -146 (CENTENNIAL LAKES). Engineer Fran
Hoffman stated that this project would be to conduct grading of all Phase I land
in the Centennial Lakes project (Hedberg). The estimated project cost is
$620,350.74 to be assessed over 2,449,814 square feet for an estimated cost of
$.2532 per square foot. Staff would recommend approval of the plans and
specifications and that bids be taken for the -mass grading. Commissioner Kelly
introduced the following resolution and moved adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT AND
DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS'
FOR GRADING IMPROVEMENT NO. C -146
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA:
1. The plans and specifications for the proposed improvement set forth in the
following Advertisement for Bids form, heretofore prepared by the HRA's consulting
engineer and now on file in the office of the Executive Director are hereby
approved.
2. The Executive Director shall cause to be published in the Edina Sun - Current
and the Construction Bulletin the following notice of bids for the improvement:
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
4801 W. 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
CENTENNIAL LAKES GRADING IMPROVEMENT C -146 (HRA)
BIDS CLOSE OCTOBER 20, 1988
SEALED BIDS will be received and opened in the Council Chambers in Edina City Hall,
4801 West 50th Street at 11:00 A.M., Thursday, October 20, 1988. The Housing and
Redevelopment Authority (HRA) will meet at 5:00 P.M., Thursday, October 20, 1988,
to consider said bids. The following are approximate major quantities:
1,300 IF Sanitary Sewer Removal
1,300 IF Water Main Removal
1,300 LF Storm Sewer Removal
1,300 IF Sanitary Sewer Forcemain Removal
2,500 SY Bituminous Pavement Removal
600,000 CY Common Excavation
All in accordance with Plans and Specifications prepared by the HRA's consulting
engineer, Bennett- Ringrose- Wolsfeld- Jarvis - Gardner, Inc., and available at the
office of the consulting engineer, 700 Third Street South, Minneapolis, Minnesota,
55415, and on file with the Executive Director.
Plans and Specifications incorporating the work for the project may be examined at
the City Hall and at.the Office of Bennett- Ringrose- Wolsfeld- Jarvis- Gardner, Inc.,
upon deposit with them of $25.00 for each set, all of which deposit will be
refunded to each planholder who returns the Plans and Specifications in good
condition to the consulting engineer within ten (10) days after the date of
opening bids.
Bids shall be in a sealed envelope with a statement thereon showing the work
covered by the bid. Bids should be addressed to the Executive Director, City of
Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota
55424, and may be mailed or submitted personally to the Executive Director. Bids
received by the Executive Director, either through the mail or by personal
submission, after the time set for receiving them may be returned unopened.
H.R.A. Minutes
October 3, 1988
Page 2
Work must be done as described in plans and specifications on file in the office
of the Executive Director. No bids will be considered unless sealed and
accompanied_by bid bond or certified check payable to the Edina HRA in the amount
of at least ten (10) percent of all bids.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY.
Gordon Hughes
Executive Director
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Commissioner Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith,.Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
OCTOBER 24, 1988 SET AS DATE TO CONSIDER BIDS FOR CENTENNIAL LAKES GRADING.
Notion was made by Commissioner Kelly and seconded by Commissioner Turner setting
Thursday, October 24, 1988 at 5:00 p.m. to consider bids and award the bid for
Centennial Lakes Grading (Improvement No. C -146).
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, motion of Commissioner Kelly
was seconded by Commissioner Smith for adjournment. Motion carried.
Executive Director
MINUTES
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
SPECIAL MEETING
OCTOBER 24, 1988
Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner and Courtney.
A special meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority was held at
4:30 p.m. on October 24, 1988 for the purpose of awarding the bid for the
Centennial Lakes Grading project.
BID AWARDED FOR CENTENNIAL LAKES GRADING IMPROVEMENT NO. C -146. Director Gordon
Hughes advised that bids were opened on October 20, 1988 for the Centennial Lakes
Grading and that the bid tabulation is on file. The engineer's estimate for the
base bid was $543,951.00 for grading of the site and stockpiling of materials,
with options for removal of materials by specified dates. Staff would recommended
award of bid to Ames Construction, Inc. for grading of the site and removal of
materials by 7/1/90. Commissioner Smith asked if the low bidder had submitted a
performance bond. Director Hughes answered that they had done so. Commissioner
Richards asked if United Properties had reviewed the bid tabulation and had
participated in the recommendation decision. Director Hughes responded that
United Properties is in full agreement with the recommendation. Member Richards
made a motion to award bid for the Centennial Lakes Grading Improvement No. C -146
to recommended low bidder, Ames Construction, Inc., with a materials removal date
of 7/1/90. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, the meeting was adjourned by
Chairman Courtney at 4:35 p.m.
Executive Director
- MINUTES
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELgPMENT AUTHORITY
NOVEMBER 21, 1988
Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner -and Courtney.
BID AWARDED FOR PARKING FACILITY ADDITION NORTHEAST STAIR TOWER (51ST RAMP).
Director Gordon Hughes recalled that last June the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority (HRA) awarded the bid for the expansion of the 51st Street Parking Ramp.
At that time the HRA elected to accept an alternate bid to delete face brick from
the ramp. Due to the complexity of the alternate bids, staff suggested and the
HRA agreed to delete the northeast stair tower with the understanding that it
would be re -bid later. He advised that staff has worked with the 50th & France
Business Association on a redesign of the stair tower to add more glass for
security purposes and to reduce the amount of structure. The engineer's estimate
is $99,950; low bidder is Penner Development at $99,095. Staff would recommend
award to low bidder. Commissioner Turner made a motion to award the bid for
construction of the northeast enclosed stair tower at the 51st Street ramp to
recommended low bidder, Penner Development, at $99,095. Motion was seconded by
Commissioner Smith.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, motion of Commissioner Kelly
was seconded by Commissioner Turner for adjournment. Motion carried.
Executive Director
oe
F,
• � ~�bRPOMt�O •
lase
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
Agenda Item #
g
HRA
II
HRA OF EDINA
From:
FRANCIS HOFFMAN,
Consent
❑
CITY ENGINEER
Information Only
❑
Date:
FEBRUARY 21, 1989
Mgr. Recommends
0
To HRA
Subject:
0
To Council
CENTENNIAL LAKES -
PHASE I, WATERMAIN AND
Action.
EE
Motion
SANITARY SEWER PLAN
APPROVAL AND AUTHORIZA-
❑
Resolution
TION OF BIDS
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
A. Plan approval of utilities (water and sanitary sewer for Phase
I, Centennial Lakes project.
B. Authorization to take bids for Centennial Lakes utilities.
Info /Background:
t
The Centennial Lakes project is currently being graded and we are ready to
undertake the next step, installation of utilities. The utility project will
include installation of watermain and sanitary sewer in West 76th Street,
Edinborough Way north of 14. 76th Street and Parklawn Avenue, East of France.
Additionally, a water and sanitary sewer line will be installed to service the
park building. Also, utilities will be installed in the residential Phase I
area per the HRA agreement.
As such, the improvement projects and estimated costs are listed below:
Sanitary Sewer SS -380 (HRA) $ 11,987.10
Sanitary Sewer SS -381 $269,610.00
Watermain WM -366 (HRA) $ 15.562.14
Watermain WM -367 $220.612.80
These projects are petitioned by the developers and HRA for the Centennial
Lakes project. Projects SS -380 and WM -366 will be paid for by the HRA.
Projects SS -381 and WM -367 will be special assessments against all property in
the Phase I of Centennial Lakes Project.
The staff finds these projects to be feasible and recommends approval of
plans and authorization to take bids for said improvements.
A.
o e
�^O
REPORTIRECOIV MENDATION
To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
From: GORDON L. HUGHES
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
Date: FEBRUARY 21, 1989
Subject:
AUTHORIZATION OF
CONVEYANCE OF PHASE I
CENTENNIAL LAKES
CONDOMINIUMS
'Recommendation:
Agenda Item # HRA III.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends 0
To HRA
❑
To Council
Action. ❑Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Adopt the attached Resolution authorizing execution of closing documents for
Phase I Centennial Lakes Condominium land conveyance.
Info /Background:
Staff anticipates conveyance by the HRA to the.Centennial Lakes Housing
Partnership of the Phase I condominium site sometime during the next month. In
conjunction with the conveyance, several documents require execution by the
Chairman and the Secretary of the HRA. These documents were approved in concept
by the HRA in connection with its approval of the redevelopment contract for the
Centennial Lakes project last October.
The documents requiring execution by the HRA include the following:
1) Redevelopment Property Deed -
2) License Agreement (for the sales office located by the housing
developer on the site south of 76th street)
3) Covenants Agreement - the covenants agreement includes among
other things the requirement that condominium owners make
monthly payments to defray the cost of maintenance of
Centennial Lakes Park
4) Easement Agreement - the easement agreement permits the HRA to
construct certain public improvements on the grounds surrounding the
condominiums. It also permits members of the public to pass over
condominium grounds.
5) Assessment Agreement - provides a miniwwm assessed value for
each condominium unit in order to guarantee the minimum amount of tax
increments required to repay City bonds.
6) Consent and Approval of the Construction Mortgage for the
Condominiums
Mr. Erickson and I are prepared to answer any questions you may have concerning
these documents at the February 21, 1989 meeting.
`n
CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES
City: City of Edina, Minnesota
Governing body: Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A special meeting held on
February 21, 1989 at 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the City Hall.
Commissioners present:
Commissioners absent:
Documents attached:
Minutes of said meeting (Pages): 1 and 2
RESOLUTION RATIFYING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION
OF VARIOUS DOCUMENTS
I the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting
recording officer of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of
Edina, Minnesota (the HRA), certify that the documents attached
hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the
original records of the HRA in my legal custody, from which they
have been transcribed; that said documents are a correct and
complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the Board of
Commissioners at said meeting; and that said meeting was duly
held by the HRA at the time and place and was attended throughout
by the commissioners indicated above, pursuant to call and notice
of such meeting given as required by law.
WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer
this day of , 1989.
Gordon Hughes, Executive Director
i
Commissioner introduced the
following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION RATIFYING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND
DELIVERY OF VARIOUS DOCUMENTS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the
Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the
"HRA "), as follows:
1. Recitals. The HRA and the Edina City Council have
previously approved a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota
Statutes, Section 462.421, subdivision 15, designated as the
Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, and have approved various
amendments thereto (as so amended, the "Redevelopment Plan ").
Acting pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan, the HRA has acquired
certain land in the area included in the Redevelopment Plan and
it has been proposed that the HRA sell and transfer a portion
of such land to the East Edina Housing Foundation (the
"Foundation "), pursuant to a Land Sale Agreement by and between
the HRA and the Foundation (the "Agreement "). By a resolution
adopted March 7, 1988, the HRA approved the form of the Agreement
and authorized any two officers of the HRA to execute and deliver
the Agreement on behalf of the HRA with such modifications as
were deemed appropriate and approved by the Chairman and the
Executive Director of the HRA. Pursuant to such authorization
the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the HRA executed and delivered
the Agreement dated on or as of March 14, 1988. Subsequently,
by resolution dated September , 1988, the HRA approved
execution and delivery by any two officers of the HRA, on behalf
of the HRA, of an Amended and Restated Land Sale Agreement and
Contract for Private Redevelopment between the HRA and Foundation
with such modifications as the attorney for the HRA and Executive
Director of the HRA should approve (the "Amended Agreement ").
Pursuant to such authorization the Chairman and Secretary of the
HRA executed and delivered the Amended Agreement dated on or as
of September 30, 1988. In connection with the transactions
contemplated by the Amended Agreement, it is now proposed that
Phase I of the Condominium Development be commenced on the
property described on Exhibit A hereto (the "Phase I Condominium
Property ") and that the Phase I Condominium Property be conveyed
pursuant to the Amended Agreement.
2. Ratification. The execution and delivery of the
Amended Agreement dated on or as of September 30, 1988, by the
Chairman and Secretary is hereby affirmed.
3. Authorization for Execution and Delivery of
Documents. Any two officers of the HRA are authorized and
directed to execute such instruments and agreements as may be
required or be desirable to accomplish the conveyance of the
Phase I Condominium Property pursuant to the Amended Agreement.
The execution of such instruments and agreements by any two
officers of the HRA shall be conclusive evidence of the approval
of such documents by the HRA in accordance with this Resolution.
Dated as of the 21st day of February, 1989.
Chairman
Attest:
Executive Director
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution
was duly seconded by Commissioner , and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted and
was signed by the Chairman and his signature attested by the
Executive Director.
#28, 18- 8813.1
THE HOMES AT CENTENNIAL LAKES
PHASE I CONDOMINIUM LAND DESCRIPTION
All that part of LOT 1, BLOCK 2, SOUTH EDINA DEVELOPMENT ADDITION, according to
the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Beginning at the southeast corner of said LOT 1; thence on an assumed
bearing of North 00 degrees 14 minutes 09 seconds West, along the easterly
line of said LOT 1 for 100.00 feet; thence North 18 degrees 11 minutes 57
seconds East, along said easterly line for 47.23 feet; thence South 89
degrees 45 minutes 51 seconds West for 148.64 feet; thence North 45 degrees
14 minutes 09 seconds West for 35.67 feet; thence North 00 degrees 14 minu-
tes 09 seconds West for 37.79 feet; thence South 89 degrees 45 minutes 51
seconds West for 143.93 feet to the westerly line of said LOT 1; thence
South 00 degrees 14 minutes 09 seconds East, along said westerly line for
146.64 feet; thence South 35 degrees 08 minutes 34 seconds East for 154.42
feet to the southerly line of said Lot 1; thence North 56 degrees 15 minutes
46 seconds East, along said southerly line for 5.00 feet; thence easterly
for 222.69 feet along said southerly line on a tangential curve concave to
the south, radius 377.50 feet and central angle 33 degrees 47 minutes 55
seconds, to the point of beginning.
O
1
J�
O
o�
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Kenneth Rosland
From: Phil Dommer
Date: February 21, 1989.
Subject: S -89 -1, Preliminary Plat
Approval, Fairview
Southdale Addition,
BTO Development
Agenda Item # 11. A'.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
11,
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
0
To Council
Action. ❑
Motion
0
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Note: The proposed subdivision is for non-residential property an
not subject to the moratorium.
Recommendation:
re
Preliminary Plat Approval (with variance) has been recommended by the Planning Commission
subject to the approval of required easements by Staff and the City Attorney and the
,approval of building variances by the Board of Appeals and Adjustments.
Info /Background:
The proposed plat creates one new lot around the proposed medical office building which
was approved in June of 1987. The purpose of the plat is to facilitate financing of
the building without encumbering the remainder of the Fairview campus.
The-new lot does not have 30 feet of frontage on a public street and therefore a variance
is included in the request. The purpose of the requirement is to prevent land locked
parcels. The Planning Commission considered this variance and recommended approval
noting that, the filing of perpetual cross easements will satisfy the requirement. Such
easements have been prepared and reviewed by City Staff and the City Attorney.
Certain other building variances will be considered by the Board of Appeals and Adjustments
on March 2, 1989. None of the variances alter the development plan from that reviewed
and approved by the City Council in 1987.
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
HELD ON FEBRUARY 1, 1989, AT 7:30 P.M.
EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman, Gordon Johnson, John Bailey, Lee Johnson, Del
Johnson, Helen McClelland, David Runyan, John Palmer,
Virginia Shaw, Geof Workinger
STAFF PRESENT: Philip S. Dommer, Senior Planner
Jackie Hoogenakker, Secretary
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES:
Commissioner Palmer moved for approval of the January 4, 1989 Community
Development and Planning Commission Minutes. Commissioner Runyan seconded the
motion. All vote aye. Motion carried.
II. NEW BUSINESS:
5 -89 -1 Preliminary Plat Approval
Fairview Southdale Addition
BTO Development and
Fairview Southdale Hospital
Note: The Drowsed subdivision is for non - residential property and is
therefore, not subject to the moratorium.
Mr. Dommer presented his staff report noting the proposed preliminary plat
encompasses all of the Fairview Southdale Hospital property. The plat would
create two lots. Lot 1 would include the hospital, the power plant and all
parking and common areas. Lot 2 would encompass the building pad for the
proposed medical office building. The purpose of the subdivision is to
facilitate mortgage financing for the medical office building., Mr. Dommer
reminded the Commission the City Council gave Final Development Plan approval
for the medical office building in June, 1987. The revised plan has minor
modifications. The modifications are all within the scope of modifications
allowed by the Ordinance. Mr. Dommer added the proponents request a variance
from the zoning requirement to have at least 30 feet of frontage on an improved
public street. The intent of this requirement is to prevent land locked
parcels. This requirement can be satisfied by filing cross easements over all
parking and drive aisle areas.
Mr. Dommer concluded that in reviewing this proposal staff reviewed a
alternative which would have satisfied the frontage requirement by a strip of
land 30 feet wide from Lot 2 to West 65th Street. He added in his opinion the
proposed Lot 2, and requested variance is a cleaner, more straight forward
approach. Access for Lot 2 is assured by the cross easements. Staff recommends
E
approval of the Preliminary Plat subject to receipt of the executed
cross - easement agreement.
Commissioner D. Johnson asked Mr. Dommer if the revised plan has changed
the configuration of the Fairview Southdale Campus. Mr. Dommer said there is no
change to the campus.
Commissioner McClelland stated she is very uncomfortable with this
proposal. She pointed out the possibility of setting a precedent if the
variance is granted. Mr. Dommer reiterated that this is being proposed to
facilitate financing. He explained the intent of the Zoning Ordinance in
requiring at least 30 feet of frontage on an improved public street is to
prevent land locked parcels. The proposed cross ,easements over all parking and
drive aisle areas will prevent that.
Commissioner L. Johnson asked Mr. Dommer if the City Attorney, Tom Erickson
has reviewed the presented proposal. Mr. Dommer replied that Mr. Erickson has
reviewed the access easement concept proposal and is comfortable with it subject
to the required subdivision variance.
Mr. Allan Hill, representing the proponents explained that if this
subdivision is approved this parcel will be put on the tax roles. To bring this
into perspective he pointed out that Daytons, Carsons and J.C. Penney's all own
their buildings at the Southdale Shopping Center thus they require cross
easements.
Commissioner Palmer moved to recommend preliminary plat approval subject to
the staff condition that cross easements are accepted and approved by the City
Staff and City Attorney and legally executed. Commissioner Bailey seconded the
motion. Upon roll call vote: Ayes; Bailey, D. Johnson, L. Johnson, G.
Workinger, V. Shaw, D. Runyan , Palmer, G. Johnson. Nay: H. McClelland. Motion
carried.
LOCATION MAnj
T "
%�:• .� HERITAGE DR
!•• ?
IL
M. 64 TH ST
FPIRVI ;y
OUT OA `= Y
65 H S.
.. t <J �II -r - f a. � •.
4. R 1 Y.f _ } - ^r , t • Vim., 4'• / � - .z -..., ti • � _ ^
C
"A v �
O SOU SHOAL <
SOUTH DALE ,
SHOPPING _CENTER
- - — ,
a
NUMBER S -89 -1
L O C A T 10 N 6401 France Avenue South
REQUEST Two Lot Subdivision
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
FEBRUARY 1, 1989
S -89 -1 Preliminary Plat Approval
Fairview Southdale Addition
BTO Development and
Fairview Southdale Hospital
General Location: East of France Avenue and north of
West 65th Street
Note: The proposed subdivision is for non - residential property and is,
therefore, not subject to the moratorium.
The proposed preliminary plat encompasses all of the Fairview Southdale
Hospital property. The plat would create two lots. Lot 1 would include the
hospital, the power plant and all parking and common areas. Lot 2 would
encompass the building pad for the proposed medical office building. The
purpose of the subdivision is to facilitate mortgage financing for the medical
office building.
The Zoning Ordinance requires that all lots have at least 30 feet of
frontage on an improved public street, other than a limited access highway. Lot
2 of the proposed plat does not satisfy this requirement. Thus, a variance from
the requirement is requested. The intent of the requirement is to prevent
land - locked parcels. The proponents, in order to insure against a land locked
lot, have agreed to mutual, perpetual cross easement over all parking and drive
aisle areas.
Since the City Council's approval of the Final Development Plan for the
medical office building in June, 1987, a new developer, BTO Development has
taken over the project. The new developers have made minor changes to the plans
previously approved. The changes include minor modifications to the ramp, the
landscaping, and building materials. The modifications are all within the scope
of modifications allowed by the Ordinance.
The new developer has held several meeting with representatives of the
Colony Condominium Association. Attached is a letter, singed by the Colony
President, approving the modified plans.
Recommendation
In reviewing this proposal staff reviewed a alternative which would have
satisfied the frontage requirement by a strip of land 30 feet wide from Lot 2 to
West 65th Street. It is my opinion that the proposed Lot 2, and requested
variance is a cleaner, more straight forward approach. Access for Lot 2 is
assured by the cross easements.
Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat subject to receipt of the
executed cross - easement agreement.
AIrM•�r r.. _ «_w M w •itl�ry ••— iw�ri� Ir��}'•
'
PREUMWARY PLAT OF
r.... r 1EOAl oESCRIrTI N
NI w•w « ti.� fir_ «ww \
• M7 � .«�•wl.wrr r� « ^rr y tll J,w1. rlwY '': tlwMM i 1 �' 4
Itir: '. _ rr •w.'i.r^ M�_.... _ . ,�.r .w rrr �t�.l� /..°1 wriw ;, . (.���'
• wtir�• .► ••r N —•'�.. .LLB 1/Mi u�N ��i i. 1[7
. r :.::...w "%:.:�• • .rr° 4r i'Yir:: °•'� Iw .:.r..... ' In.w. w nw
_ Ya.l •� JAI i . ..• :� ,■" t w�� \ w
rw w •'N. N•:. r I�II�I«11 P::1N .r O1N w G,�1^ ,�► •,� \/6 �.
rimer �
1
r /
_LEASE PRO
TOTAL AREA
44395 go.
i
. -fl:;
1
1, I
I
1 11
• ' 1
r 1
� tea- w..y�! •� .� �� - .. •\
m. C3= TgO�TAL 0.
AR[A K dE• • 2
\ \ \ \ LOT f
1 � \ m
1 '•
lv '
r ,j.nA�ua• e,W I %L
r,
E,5TH
"I I.�� one
5r=
II r
+y
'ter
'
"All
ONE
• win :n 1�• = „,•r n
��:.� n
J I
w • r..w w.w I
b.rl.o• Rrri. ELIriN. t)k,w Nt
,r... wr.n •mm rw.._N.r ,sw.en
rae
Notts
• ° wnw r Iw.n r nm r r rmw.
rtr rrrr.n. rw•mowwwr,.n :r'i�
r,
j
rw w n. nm r r rwurnr rlr.ro w w. Im
• wi. r vniu rw n 1.
wm �rMnrtw.� •'
-�rri
1
•r.. w' n•�•'rs rw
:�rn .., irtl v.vn r'rrein wn rivu.
wmn wa ,e rwr u,u an rlom.
• mrnmtlwsnw, rrnr rn. w..
�
� r
• nn i yr.wr ^.� wpwns.�: ww rwr rw•,w
: � ' LI
•�+n,w rw +wrwa �. �lw raw,w
: w�i
• fM1 Nwrrw ww anrwra
�1
�
1�r1 0 : wr rwr ssl swI wwrw w r
-ti
• e °I�i r. rrwrw r • wr Nw . rrrrw
SS.
r AA r.
• LowNAwAwu�
Ltdtmd
!�
'
to �•,.cl +,
ian
i
. -fl:;
1
1, I
I
1 11
• ' 1
r 1
� tea- w..y�! •� .� �� - .. •\
m. C3= TgO�TAL 0.
AR[A K dE• • 2
\ \ \ \ LOT f
1 � \ m
1 '•
lv '
r ,j.nA�ua• e,W I %L
r,
E,5TH
"I I.�� one
5r=
II r
+y
'ter
'
"All
ONE
• win :n 1�• = „,•r n
��:.� n
J I
w • r..w w.w I
b.rl.o• Rrri. ELIriN. t)k,w Nt
,r... wr.n •mm rw.._N.r ,sw.en
rae
'16 1F1o� I'r1' ;al * v. #' , v •u "gT�': ���vxi-�:.,, +...• .�o....�..,,�_ ,. �, e f _ .a,, f ,! :ti�.J .+°!( IP, iiY Gi�� '' 1-,t. it
F f Y
1 f �, e. iaf7� - _ '*:r dy �,1 >hl. t^ '"'jy`,� } `�,, Y 1 j 1.... - s p•, d, F�ryR�w+.�.��t,r :. •�� < �•F r ' -4 ;._
V
` y '. ���� ••._ '__..- _..._.. .�FW7�►n-- :Tyv+e . 4:e..}y,,yyNLyn'� ia ,v
e
G.— .'•' 11 rY
,1 .��� 1 � �. ! 1 ifs -b' Q� : �+ r r � � ��'�� ,�� � . � .y.��l.,: �y �'j� � I�. tt T �f.- � ttl;'• ��
. A ^ Fi _ i F �n� r r� _`.ice' �, J 7•T' :e,Jr i 1 :�?,� •7
s I• vx I 'i ' t t. _ r 1 k W ..'•b... LL�--A r
1 _ rT I
1
r EEtC L},4 � !' � h . J� 1 y � I �y� '1C4 �,� � ! Y,4t I�� ® ®�I1■I,1"���,,, ���ff .C�. �'�
t$ F°1 ■ ■■a. �,,,,�,�® � `; I. '' c. y�'k
r 1�7 fay a ® ®s���o■t■FMg§® ®RR[��'Qjj,1L55s:� x� f
:�t j' " t•:7F td'' ' ' , , _,+ ■ ��®® ���® �gx..'i1�yr��lrryb,�3i�tq�l•� ''' ..lv{ •,, �".;' '�,
�tI kvi L`LP 'L"
" � •�y v d '� ?� 1 r i 1 -{e j i 1 d M7 �%• F�, ,4 v ��J�t" � 1�F J�. -�.F.
1 1 f , i � Y' +,r M y`Y � 1., Via+ i•1 k.�✓..M{y� [/ `\ C'r� 1' er�17: m��.
� d ••, lIl. i � `S t 1 - 1� �. F I 5 it 7 7 � .
yt�y k
7
h1
5 ., yF W (,1r'.�,e n ?' yEe. }f�+i •1 , P $� �y'",�.5� raj ` �x I 't 5S + eia/n }'§�f1'�a`i }7.. :}.. 17L+1 1..
. 1.. \15:.0 1� � vv i'I [ 1 9�f1� � /3'T ( , -i� �1 Yy�Aai palY7c. i� r 9i .✓ > G�'15�. ,.z,v
• y���� �i �/°�'et�j� r � rl y r -: . � �sT \> 7 �ti ,1'v�7 }.Y"�tt<�r a�:k, yj6l 4. Y �•. .�
:
r �_y
5 '•Fa 1. :'� 4 1 1 (~ r (.aVl. iJ r ;. .. .. . �. �• ::,7 f d a
A
:E _ t F8 0 8f Z
jis
Iasi� rn
D . 690 I p /
a
yc-�
G
PRELIMINARY
v P �; a `eS' Y F °v SITE PLAN : e• e
FAIRVIEW COUTNDAL! PHYSICIANS BUILDING m "' • �r. _
EDINA. hUNNE90TA ` `•�
r�
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
LA
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000
DATE. 16 February, 1989 AGENDA ITEM IV.A
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
�- See Attached Tabulation 1.
2. 2.
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Landwehr Heavy Moving, Inc. $ 81,075.50
GENERAL INFORMATION:
The three storm sewer projects are funded from the stormwater utility
fund. The Valley View Road project at the Nine Mile Creek (Braemar
Branch) and the Apache Road project are projects which lower the flood
potential on private property by moving water to public areas. The
Wooddale Glen project replaces an existing pipe that has deteriorated
to a point that it needs replacement. See attached map.
Public Works - Utilities
Sig ture Department
The Recommended bid is — , ~
within budget not withiq,i gq-J 9fq WM ineVnance Director
eth Rosland. City
February 16, 1989
11:00 A.M.
BID TABULATION
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
CONTRACT # 88 -9 (ENG)
STORM SEWER
VALLEY VIEW AT SALLY LANE DITCH, SALLY LANE AND APACHE ROAD &
WOODDALE GLEN TO MINNEHAHA CREEK
BIDDER
TOTAL
Landwehr Heavy Moving, Inc.
$ 81.075.50
Holst Excavating, Inc.
$ 81.473.00
G. L. Contracting, Inc.
$ 84,137.97
Richard Knutson, Inc.
$ 84,914.00
J. P. Norex, Inc.
$ 88.606.30
Lake Area Utility Contracting, Inc.
$ 88.738.50
Imperial Developers
$ 89,499.00
HRS Construction, Inc.
$ 92.352.50
Sevcon, Inc.
$ 94.789.50
F. F. Jedlicki, Inc.
$ 103.487.00
S. M. Hentges & Sons. Inc.
$ 105,578.80
Albrecht Excavating, Inc.
$ 106,802.00
Widner, Inc.
$ 113.021.00
Continental Tunneling
S 113.851.00
Lametti & Sons. Inc.
$ 118.905.00
Engineers Estimate $ 95.469.00
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST- FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: 8 February, 1989
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Company
AGENDA ITEM IV . B.
Amount of Quote or Bid
1 - McNeilus Steel Inc. 1• $ 5,230.22
2. Williams Steel & Hardware 2. $ 5,605.71
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: McNeilus Steel Inc.
$ 5,230.22
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This is a purchase of steel which is done on an annual basis for various
departments which uses tubing, pipe, bar stock, round & square steel bars.
This material is used from repair ,purposes to manufacturing special items
for City use. This is funded from the Equipment Operation, Park and
Utility funds.
Si ature
The Recommended bid is
Public Works — Equipment Operation
Department
within budget not
Kenneth Rosland, City
Wallin, Firfance Director
REQUEST" FOR PUR
Ca-iASlc
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS-OF $5,000
DATE. February 15, 1989
AGENDA ITFM IV . C .
ITEM DESCRIPTION: 1 -ton Truck
Company
1. Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet
2.
3.
4.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet
Amount of Quote or Bid
1. $10,798
2.
3.
4.
5.
$10,798
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Chevrolet 1 -ton truck to replace vehicle 447 -365 1977 Dodge 1 -ton.
Recommend Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet through Hennepin County
Bid Contract 49544.
Parks & Recreation
i
The Recommended bid is x
within budget not within-budm
Kenneth Rosland,
Finance Director
Manager
REQUEST FOR PUR /�
o.; CHASE
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000,
DATE. February 15, 1989 _ IV.D.
AGENDA ITEM
ITEM DESCRIPTION: John Deere Mower
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1• Gruber's Power Equipment 1. $ 6156 `
2. Scharber & Sons 2. $ 6340
3. Jerry's Enterprises 3. $ 7390
4. 4
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Gruber's Power Equipment $ 6156
GENERAL INFORMATION:
John Deere Mower to replace vehicle X647 -667 1981 Gravely 9000 Mower.
The Recommended bid is
Parks & Recreation
ture Department
L Within budget not within " dg ohn all' , Finance Director
Kenneth Rosland City anager
Cn REQUEST FOR P
URCHASE
J
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director of Park and Recreation Dept.
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000
DATE. Feb. 15, 1989 AGENDA ITEM Iv . E .
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Replacemeick-uphicle-
Company
1. Polar Cheverolet
2.
3.
4.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Amount of Quote or Bid
1 $11,623
2.
3.
4.
5.
Polar Cheverolet $11,623
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Chevrolet 4x4 1/2 ton pick -up, 1989, to replace vehicle # 44 -277
1982 Cheverolet 1/2 ton pick -up. Recommend Polar Cheverolet
through Hennepin County Contract #9544.
ature Department
The Recommended bid is
within budget not within b0geY,. John/Wal1 fi, Finance Director
Kenneth Rosland, City
� 4A. tI
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Bob Kojetin,.Director
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: February 15, 1989 AGENDA ITEM IV.F.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Replacement Vehicle - Pick -up Truck
_Company Amount of Quote or Bid
Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet 1. $8,244
2. 2.
3. 3
4. 4.
5. 5
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet $8,244
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Chevrolet S -10 Pick -up truck replacement vehicle for #47 -287
1978 Ford F -150 Van. Recommend Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet;
through Hennepin-County Bid Contract #9544.
The Recommended bid is
--k-
Within budget not within
Parks & Recreation
Finance Director
V.A
.f,
MINUTES
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
FEBRUARY 14, 1989
9:00 A.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Fran Hoffman, Chairman
Alison Fuhr
Gordon Hughes
Bob Sherman
Craig Swanson
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
OTHERS PRESENT: Mr. Steve Malmlov, 5436 Xerxes Avenue South
Captain Leonard Kleven, Edina Police Department
Ms. Joan Waterstreet, Edina Police Department
Ms. Candy Fiedler, Engineering Department
SECTION A
Requests on which the Committee recommends approval as requested or modified,
and the Council's authorization of recommended action.
(1) Request to upgrade the intersection of West 54th Street and Xerxes
Avenue South from a two -way "STOP" to a four -way "STOP ".
Continued from January, 1989 meeting.
ACTION TAKEN:
Captain Kleven reviewed the motion from the January meeting to determine
the exact boundaries of Edina and also to conduct a speed survey on
Xerxes Avenue prior to today's meeting. The results were that Edina's
jurisdiction includes only the southwest leg of the intersection, which
is already controlled by a "STOP" sign. The other leg of West 54th Street
is the responsibility of Minneapolis and Xerxes Avenue is designated a
county road, and therefore is under the jurisdiction of Hennepin County.
He also stated that the Traffic Enforcement Unit had been assigned to
this area and that speed was, in fact, a problem. A number of vehicles
travel at between 40 -50 mph on this stretch of roadway, instead of the
posted 30 mph limit.
Mr.' Malmlov, a representative of the neighborhood, also stated that the
speed issue was of great concern to the area residents. He said that
residents feared approaching their vehicles due to the speed, combined
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES
,,?'February 14, 1989
Page 2
(Continued)
with the narrow structure of the roadway. Mrs. Fuhr asked if it might
be helpful to sign the roadway "NO PARKING" in this area, but Mr. Malmlov
commented that there are a number of rental units in the area with inade-
quate off - street parking. Therefore, parking on Xerxes Avenue was the
only alternative for those residents.
Mr. Hughes moved that the Committee refer the item to both Hennepin County
and Minneapolis for review, and that we assign the Traffic Enforcement
Unit to additional speed enforcement on Xerxes Avenue. Mr. Sherman
seconded the motion. Motion carried 5 -0.
F
(2) Discuss traffic safety concerns on West 70th Street at.the east frontage
road of Highway 100.
Requested by Alison Fuhr, Traffic Safety Committee.
ACTION TAKEN:
This item was brought before the Committee for review in January. Vehicles
exiting nouthbound Highway 100 and proceeding across West 70th Street to
go northbound on the frontage road are in conflict with westbound vehicles
on West 70th Street who are negotiating a right turn on red. The problem
seems to be that turning vehicles do not give the right -of -way to through
vehicles. It is the consensus that turning vehicles only look at inter-
section traffic and not traffic exiting Highway 100 and proceeding north-
bound.
Captain Kleven also has observed problems with eastbound West 70th Street
traffic turning northbound onto Highway 100. All lanes, both through
lanes and the turning lanes for Highway 100 and the frontage road, are
clearly marked. However, some vehicles will approach the turn in the
frontage road lane, and then try to quickly merge to the left to go
northbound on Highway 100, clearly in violation of the signing. Because
the area is heavily congested, setting up an enforcement vehicle in the
median is more hazardous than the driving conduct of the offending vehicles.
Mrs. Fuhr suggested placing a "NO RIGHT TURN ON RED" sign for westbound
West 70th Street traffic. The problem is that this type of signing seems
to only be effective when an enforcement vehicle is in that immediate
vicinity.
Mr. Swanson suggested a "CAUTION" sign that would alert westbound traffic
that there may be through traffic approaching from the left.
Mr. Hughes moved that a "CAUTION" sign with appropriate wording be 1p aced
on West 70th Street and Highway 100 for westbound traffic. Mrs. Fuhr
seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES
,t'February 14, 1989
Page 3
(Continued)
(3) Discuss traffic safety concerns regarding west frontage road access to
southbound Highway 100 at West 77th Street/Edina Industrial Boulevard.
Unscheduled agenda item requested by Captain Kleven, Edina Police Depart-
ment.
ACTION TAKEN:
The concern brought before the Committee on this item was that the south-
bound traffic on the west frontage road to Highway 100 has two traffic
lanes up to the intersection of West 77th Street /Edina Industrial Boule-
vard. There is no lane delineation at this intersection as to through
or turning lanes. Once the intersection is crossed, it immediately goes
from a two -lane road to a one -lane roadway for southbound Highway 100.
Mr. Hoffman stated that he was not aware that this item was coming before
the Committee, and he had, in fact, spoken to MNDOT about this very issue
just weeks before. It was their recommendation that the left lane would
be designated left turn /through traffic and the right lane would be disig-
nated right turn only.
No.further action was taken on this item.
Motion to adjourn.
Respectfully submitted,
EDINA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
° iA%
A.
ch
.�-
• 'N�APO:V``�O •
mad
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
Mayor & City Council
Agenda Item #
Y`
From:
Francis Hoffman
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Date:
21 February, 1989
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
Resolution Requesting
0
To Council
Mn /DOT Policy Change
RE: I -494 Frontage
Action
❑
Motion
Roads
0
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Authorize a resolution requesting the Minnesota Department of Transportation
(Mn /DOT) to revise their policy regarding detached frontage roads.
Info /Background:
The I -494 Project Management Team and the I -494 Joint Powers Organization (JPO)
have been requested to submit a letter to the Commissioner of Mn /DOT supporting
the attached Resolution. Additionally, the I -494 JPO felt that each City Council
should review the issue and support the general concept as it relates to the I -494
Corridor Area.
The attached Resolution describes the conditions involved and 'the staff will make
a short presentation at the Council Meeting.
a
RESOLUTION URGING MN/DOT TO REVISE POLICIES REGARDING
FUNDING FOR DETACHED REPLACEMENT FRONTAGE ROADS
WHEREAS, the City of Edina participated in the I -494 Corridor Study.
AND WHEREAS, the I -494 Corridor Study concluded that some of the I -494
frontage roads east of France Avenue will be lost to the eventual freeway
expansion.
AND WHEREAS,. the I -494 Corridor Study concluded than an effective sys-
tem of supporting arterial roadways is necessary to service short and medium
trips within the corridor.
AND WHEREAS, the I -494 Corridor Study identified 77th, 79th and 80th
Streets as replacements to the north and south frontage road lost to freeway
expansion and as a supporting arterial roadway for I -494.
AND WHEREAS, existing Mn /DOT funding policies would allow,funding of
the replacement of the north and south frontage,road if it were adjacent to
the freeway.
AND WHEREAS, replacing these north and south frontage roads adjacent to
the freeway will mean high right -of -way costs and an adjacent frontage road
will not function effectively as a supporting arterial.roadway.
AND WHEREAS, existing Mn /DOT funding policy does not allow funding of
detached replacement frontage roads.
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that:
Mn /DOT be urged to revise its present frontage road funding policy to
pay for detached replacement urban frontage roads using the same funding
formula as used for frontage roads'adjacent to interstate and trunk high-
ways.
The City Clerk is hereby directed to forward copies of this Resolution
to the Commissioner of Mn /DOT, the Mn /DOT District 5 Engineer, and I -494
Joint Powers Commission.
r
'r
A.
• ��RPOMZ�� •
see
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To:
KENNETH ROSLAND
Agenda Item #
° • c
CITY MANAGER
From:
JANET CHANDLER
Consent
❑
RECYCLING COORDINATOR
Information Only
❑
Date:
FEBRUARY 21, 1989
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
0
To Council
RECYCLING PROGRAM
Action.
El
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Recycling Program Review: Public Hearing, Contract Process and
Ordinances.
Info /Background:
Report attached.
0
February 16, 1.989
RECYCLING. PROGRAM REVIEW
PUBLIC HEARING, CONTRACT PROCESS AND ORDINANCES
At the Feb. 6th Council Meeting a resolution was passed which directed
that the City begin the bid process to contract with a single contractor for
city -wide recycling pickup service, following the public hearing process
as may be required. In addition, the following points were decided upon:
a. Recyclables shall be placed for collection in the same place as
garbage: "in the rear of the premises in such a manner as to be out
of view from the street in front of the premises or in a garage
located on the premises." (Ord. 71 1)
b. No cost should be passed on to the resident except through the
General Fund.
c. No rebate program to the resident would be instituted.
d. Funding should be procured from Hennepin Co. for all eligible costs.
Authorization for container purchase was not given, therefore the bid
process for containers has been cancelled.
The purpose of this memo is to update the Council on the legal require-
ments of the program directed by the Council.
Attached is an opinion from Mr. Erickson concerning the hearing process.
As noted in the opinion, the City need not undertake the hearing process as
previously thought. We have discussed this new legal opinion with four of
the five residential haulers. The consensus of the haulers is that if they
had the opportunity, they would present their case again. However, they
felt the process to date has been fair and they have had opportunities to
testify. Therefore, it does not appear that the haulers will be critical if
the March 6 hearing is cancelled. In fact, two haulers state that they have
already cancelled equipment orders based on the February 6 Council action.
We, of course, cannot speculate on the number of residents who may wish
to testify on March 6.
I
If Council determines that it is not necessary to follow through with the
public hearing process, staff foresees an appoximate schedule as follows:
Publication of RFP- -Early March
Receive proposals -- Early April
Contract Agreement -May 1 Council Meeting
Program Start -up - -July 1
(Please refer to the options given in Mr. Erickson's letter of February 14)
Ordinance Amendments will be needed as follows:
01001, anti- scavenging
0711, definition of "recyclables" and creation of citywide recycling
collection district
These should be considered prior to the time the contract is awarded.
Mr. Erickson has opined that the City may request proposals (RFP's) for the
city wide service rather than bids as is customarily the case for public
projects. The major difference is that under the RFP approach, the City is
not necessarily obligated to award the contract to the lowest bidder. As a
result, the request for proposal can be worded more generally than the bid
specifications and the City is able to negotiate with everyone responding
with proposals to select the best combination of service and price.
Further considerations on the question of public bidding versus requests
for proposals are noted in .the attached letter from Mr. Erickson dated
October 21, 1988.
Select the desired option regarding the public hearing process as set
out in Mr. Erickson's letter of February 14, page two.
2. Recommend RFP or bid process for recycling contract.
350 PARK AVENUE
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022
(212) 415 -9200
3 GRACKCHURCH STREET
LONDON EC3V OAT, ENGLAND
01- 929 -3334
36, RUE TRONCHET
73009 PARRS, FRANCE
01- 42- 66 -59 -49
340 FIRST NATIONAL BANE BUILDING
P. 0. BOX 848
ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 55903
(507)288 -3156
510 NORTH CENTRAL LIFE TOWER
445 MINNESOTA STREET
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
(612)227-8017
DOBSEY & WHITNEY
A P�8e 81v I...00.wo Pwrae &.." Co.Po .ONE
2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
(612) 340 -2600
TELEX 29 -0605
TELECOPIER (612)340 -2868
THOMAS S. ERICKSON, P. A.
(612) 340 -2659
February 14, 1989
The Honorable Members of
the Edina City Council, and
Kenneth E. Rosland,
City Manager
4801 West 50 Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Re: Collection of Recyclable Materials
Dear Members of the City Council
and Mr. Rosland:
1200 FIRST INTERSTATE CENTER
401 NORTH 31" STREET
P. O. BOX 7188
BILLINGS, MONTANA 59103
(406)252 -3800
201 DAVIDSON BUILDING
8 THIRD STREET NORTH
GREAT FALLS, MONTANA 59401
(406)727 -3632
127 EAST FRONT STREET
MISSOULA, MONTANA 59802
(406)721 -6025
315 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
WAYZATA., MINNESOTA 55391
(612)475-0373
At the City Council meeting of February 6, I advised
the City Council that if it wished to establish a system
for the collection of recyclables using one city -wide collector
it would be necessary to follow the provisions of Minnesota
Statutes, Section 115A.94. That statute requires two weeks
published notice of a public hearing, adoption of a resolution
of intent relative to the collection of materials, and a
ninety -day period during which the City will develop or
supervise the development of plans and proposals for the
collection of recyclables. As I also mentioned during the
meeting of February 6, the application of Section 115A.94
to recyclable materials was a question of considerable debate
and differences of opinion among the metropolitan communities
and Hennepin County. Some communities had concluded that
said Section does apply to recyclable materials, and some
communities had concluded that it does not. Also, Hennepin
County has concluded that it does not apply. Subsequent
to that meeting I again reviewed the statute, did further
research, and conversed with other.municipalities and Hennepin
County, concerning its application. Based on that further
research and review, it is now our opinion that the statute
does not apply.
Based upon the Council's direction made at the
meeting of February 6 (again, based upon my opinion -chat
DoRSEY & WHITNEY
February 14, 1989
Page Two
the statute applied) a notice of public hearing has been
published setting a hearing date of March 6. Because we
are now of the opinion that Section 115A.94 does not apply,
the Council has a number of options as follows:
1. Cancel the hearing for March 6 and direct
the staff to prepare ordinances for providing for one city -wide
collector for recyclables and the necessary information
for a request for proposals or for public bidding, as the
Council desires.
2. Hold a.hearing on March 6, but not further
follow Section 115A.9.4, and at the conclusion of that hearing,
direct the staff to prepare the necessary ordinance amendments
and information for request for proposals or bidding.
3. Hold the hearing on March 6 and follow Section
115A.94, including the adoption of a resolution of intent
to collect recyclables with a ninety -day period within which
to prepare the necessary ordinance amendments and documenta-
tion. (Of course, since the Statute need not be followed
the ninety -day period can be shortened by the Council.)
I am sorry to have caused this confusion for the
Council. I trust this letter provides you the necessary
guidelines for further action on this recycling issue.
Very truly yours,
Thomas S. Erickson
TSE:jd
cc: Gordon Hughes
Janet Chandler
October 21, 1988
Mr. Gordon L. Hughes
_ City of Edina
4801 West 50 Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
- Re: Collection of Recyclable Materials
Dear Gordon:
You have asked whether the City can create
one or more districts within the City for the collection
of. recyclable waste materials and enter into contracts
for. such collection without publicly bidding for those
contracts.
The Uniform Municipal Contracting Law (Minn.
Statute Sect. 471.345) requires public bidding for any
contract for the "sale or purchase of supplies, materials,
equipment. or the construction, alteration, repair
or maintenance of real or personal property." A contract
for the collection of recyclable materials would not
appear to fit into the definition of a "contract" under
.:.:?;. the Uniform Municipal Contracting Law, and therefore
would not be subject to the Uniform Municipal Contracting
Law requirements. This is confirmed by an opinion of
the Minnesota Attorney General's office (AG opinion No.
707a -15, December 23, 1977, copy enclosed), which holds
that a statutory city is not required to advertise for
bids prior to contracting with a private party for the
collection of refuse from residences, business and certain
P ublic property within the city. The attorney general
opined that the main purpose of such collection was public
health and not the sale or purchase of supplies, material
or equipment or construction, alteration, repair or
maintenance of real or personal property. Therefore,
Mr. Gordon L. Hughes
October 21, 1988
Page Two
based upon the language of the statute and the attorney
general's interpretation thereof, there would not appear
to be any requirement for public bidding of a contract
for collection of recyclable materials.
We also discussed the impact of Ordinance No.
711 on the proposed contracts for collection of recyclable
materials. That ordinance ,allows the City to.establish
exclusive hauling districts. It was my understanding
`... that one had been created for the Morningside area and
possibly one for 50th and France. You opined that the
Norningside district is no longer an exclusive district
but was nonexclusive in that each home owner could contract
with whatever hauler he or she desired. You also opined
that if there was an exclusive district for the 50th
and France area, it would not be affected because the
recyclable contracts would be only for residential areas.
we also discussed Minn. Statutes Sect. 115A.94
which controls "organized collection," which is defined
as a system for collecting solid waste in which a specified
collector is authorized to collect from a defined geograph-
ical area some or all of the solid waste from that area.
Solid waste is defined, however, as "garbage, refuse,
'� [and other material] from industrial, commercial, mining
and agricultural operations, and from community
activities.. Since our contracts are to be limited
to residential areas, we would not seem to be within
r
this statute. Also, other language in that statute would
seem ,-o be directed at establishing a collection system
' which does not impede or adversely affect the collection
and recycling of recyclable material. Therefore, we
do not believe that the requirements of that statute
relating to public notice, 90 day comment periods, public
hearings and resolutions of intent by the City Council
are applicable:
Although no public bids appear to be required
for contracts for the collection of recyclable materials,
if the City undertakes to use the bidding process then
it must, as you know, be subject to and abide by the
requirements for public bidding. As we discussed, there
would appear no good reason why these contracts should
not be publicly bid. Certainly it is the lowest responsible
bidder that the City will be seeking. Under the facts
Mr. Gordon L. Hughes
October 21, 1988
Page Three
as you gave them to me relative to the kind of detail
that will go into our request for proposals, it would
appear that the request could well be considered a bid
unless you clearly indicate on the face of the document
that you do not intend to use the public bidding process
but are merely seeking a request for proposals. You
are, as you know, in an area where the distinction between
the public bidding process and a request for proposals
may not be all that clear, and lacking such clarity you
should be clearly stating in your documents what kind
of process you will be using.
I trust the foregoing is responsive to your
inquiry and to our communications concerning this subject.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
Very truly yours,
+
Thomas S. Erickson
47
MINNESOTA LEGAL REGISTER
Published monthly and containing all Opinions
of the Minnesota Attorney General
Published by The Progress - Register
200 Upper Midwest Bldg., Minneapolis, Mn. 55401
Sold only in combination with The Progress-
Register (Weekly) at $16.00 per year In Vin -
nesota. Out -of -state 7;17.00 per year. Payable
In advance. Binder and Index service Included.
and -claas portage paid at Minneapolis, Mn.
held to include a technical prohibition against parking
an unregistered vehicle on the public highway. See Op.
Ally. Gen. 632d, March 4, 1960 (copy enclosed). Under
the circumstances presented therefore, the vehicle might
not lawfully be left where it is stopped, nor driven by
the owner elsewhere. It may thus be appropriate for law
enforcement authorities to seize the vehicle for the pur-
poses of preventing further violation of law; and also
to provide for the safety of the vehicle and its contents
while in police custody. As to the latter point, see City
Of St. Paul v. Myles, 298 Minn. 298, 218 N.W.2d 697 (1974).
In any case, whether or not the officer does seize the
vehicle under these circumstances is a question that
should be resolved by the exercise of the officer's infor-
mal and reasonable discretion.
On the basis, then, of either reason discussed, your
second question is answered in the affirmative.
WARREN SPANNAUS, Attorney General
Frederick S. Suhler, Jr., Spec. Assist. Atty. Gen.
BIDS AND CONTRACTS: STATUTORY CITIES: RE-
FUSE COLLECTION AND HAULING: Statutory city is
not required to advertise for bids prior to contracting
with private party for collection and hauling of refuse
from residential dwellings, business establishments and
certain public property within city. Minn. Stat. li 412.311
(1976) and Minn. Stat. §47"S (1976), as amended by
Mina Laws 1977, ch. 182.
Adlai W. Brink December 23, 1977
Baudette City Attorney 707a -15
Box 416
Baudette, Minnesota 56623
In your letter to Attorney General Warren Spannaus
you ask substantially the following
QUESTION
Is a statutory city required to advertise for bids prior
to contracting with a private party for the collection and
hauling of trash, garbage and other refuse from residen-
tial dwelling, business establishments and certain public
property within the city?
OPINION
Your question is answered in the negative inasmuch
as such contract is not within the purview of either of
DECEMBER 1977
the statutes imposing bidding requirements upon statu-
tory cities, i.e., Minn. Stat, 4 412.311 [Contracts] (1976)
and Minn. Stat. F 471.345 [Uniform Municipal Contracting
Law] (1976), as amended by Minn. Laws 1977, ch. 182.
Section 412.311 applies to contracts "for the purchase
of merchandise, materials or equipment or for any kind
of construction work undertaken by the city" and is clearly
inapplicable to a contract for refuse collection and haul-
ing services. Section 471.345 applies to contracts as de-
fined in subdivision 2 of the statute:
A "contract" means an agreement entered into by a
municipality for the sale or purchase of supplies, ma-
terials, equipment or the rental thereof, or the construc-
tion, alteration, repair or maintenance of real or per-
sonal property.
This section, too, is clearly inapplicable to a contract for
refuse collection and hauling services unless such con-
tract can be deemed one for the "maintenance" of real
or personal property.'
In determining whether a contract may be properly
so characterized we think it should be viewed in terms
of the primary objective a city is presumed to have in
entering such contract. In Op. Atty. Gen. 707 -A, Nov. 19,
1974, we indicated that the "maintenance" of real or
personal property, as contemplated by this statute, has
reference to services which are intended to "keep such
property in a state of efficiency and prevent a decline
from its existing condition." The opinion held that a con-
tract to furnish extensive janitorial services "' for the
terminal building at the Minneapolis -St. Paul International
Airport met this test and was therefore subject to the
competitive bidding requirements of the statute.
Although an element of maintenance may be inci-
dentally involved, the primary objective a• city is pre-
sumed to have in contracting for refuse collection and
hauling services is not the maintenance of property, but
rather, the protection of public health. Indeed, this is
the basis of the city's authority to contract for services
of this kind. In Op. Atty. Gen. 477 -B -14, March 19, 1928,
we observed:
The decisions with remarkable unanimity hold that a
municipal corporation under the police power to enforce
measures for the public health, may provide that it
shall have exclusive right to remove all garbage; and
may by contract provide for such removal and impose
the cost thereof on the owner. It may forbid removal
by unlicensed persons and grant the exclusive privilege
to one or a limited number of persons to do the work.
*This statutory language is in contrast to that found in
Minn. Stat. §375.21 which requires counties to advertise
for bids prior to entering into specified contracts, in-
cluding those for "work or labor." In Op. Atty. Gen.
125 -a-68, Oct. 26. 1973 we indicated that a county must
comply with the bidding requirements of this statute in
awarding a contract for the hauling of solid waste in the
county.
**The statement of facts in Op. Atty. Gen. 707 -A, Nov,
19, 1974 describes the services in question as including
the following: sweep, scrub and wax floors; dust and
damp wipe furniture, baggage lockers and insurance and
vending machines; wash and vacuum chairs; clean ele-
vators and escalators; wash interior windows and painted
surfaces; wash glass and floor surfaces on telephone
booths; wash and disinfect trash receptacles; dust and
wash ventilation and loudspeaker grilles; and clean rubber
mattings.
DECEMBER 1977
A similar observation appears in 7 McWllin Municipal
-c -porations f 24.251 Ord ed. 1968).
Generally a municipal corporation can contract with
one or more persons or corporations for the collection
and removal of waste matters, garbage, filth, trash,
refuse, carcasses, and offal. It may grant an exclusive
privilege to a contractor or licensee to make such col-
lection and removal for a specified period. Removal of
substances of this character must proceed quickly and
without abatement, with as little inconvenience as pos-
sible to inhabitants; and experience in such removal,
which contributes to its orderliness and efficiency, may
under some circumstances best be obtained through a
contract. In any event, it is within municipal legislative
competency to decide to have the service performed
under a contract. Accordingly, an exclusive contract for
the removal of these substances constitutes a proper
exercise of the police power.
In view of the foregoing public purpose which a con -
tract for refuse collection and hauling services is pre-
sumed intended to accomplish, such contract should not,
in our opinion, be characterized as one for the "main-
tenance" of real or personal property within the meaning
of the above statute. Since we hereby determine that
such contract is not subject to bidding requirements, it
appears unnecessary to consider your ether questions
concerning renegotiation and escalator provisions.
WARREN SPANNAUS, Attorney General
Michael R. Gallagher, Spec. Assist. Atty. Gen
STATUTORY CITIES: COUNCIL: VACANCIES: Council
member who is elected mayor may, upon becoming
mayor, participate in appointment of his successor on the
council. Minn. Stat. §§412.02 subd. 2, 415.15.
Donald L. Lais December 27, 1977
Maplewood City Attorney 471 -m
409 Midwest Federal Building
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
In your letter to Attorney General Warren Spannaus
you set forth substantially the following
FACTS
A councilman in the City of Maplewood, having two
years remaining in his term of office, ran for mavor and
was elected. He is to take office as mayor on the first
business day of 1978 at which time there will be a vacancy
on the council. The vacancy will be filled by a vote of
the council, and in the event there is a tie vote, then
the mayor mpy appoint a person to fill the vacancy. Maple-
wood is a statutory city.
Minn. Stat. 1415.15 reads as follows:
No resigning member of a city council shall partici-
pate in a vote of the council to choose a person to re-
place the resigning member.
You then ask substantially the following
QUESTION
May the newly elected mayor participate in the selec-
tion of a replacement to fill the vacancy?
OPINION
We answer your question in the affirmative.
— 48
Minn. Stat. § 412.02 subd. 2 (1976) provides that in
statutory cities:
Vacancies in office shall be filled for the remainder
of the term by the council. In case of a tie vote cn such
appointments the mayor shall fill the vacancy by ap-
pointment for the unexpired term.
As set forth above, Minn. Stat. § 415.15 (1976) pro-
hibits a "resigning member" from voting to fill such a
vacancy. In our view this section is intended to prohibit
a member who has submitted his resignation from par-
ticipating as a "lame duck" in the selection of a succes-
sor prior to the time he actually leaves the council. In
the ordinary situation, of course, the resigning member
would have no authority to participate in the vote to
select a successor after he has actually left the council.
The situation you present, however, is different. Her:
the person in question will assume a new position of
mayor, having been elected to that post by the voters.
Upon taking that office, the mayor will be vested by
statute with certain powers and responsibilities including
voting on measures before the council' and filling cer-
tain vacancies."
If the person simply assumes the office of mayor, a
vacancy will be created in his former council office by
operation of law, not by resignation.*** Thus, it might
be said that the person in question is not, technically, a
"resigning member" and thus not subject to the prohibi-
tion of Minn. Stat. § 415.15 (1976). We 'do not base our
opinion on such a narrow distinction, however.
In our opinion, the person in question will be permitted
to participate in the selection of a successor after be-
coming mayor because that is one of the powers and
duties of the office to which he was elected. In short, it
is our opinion that, regardless of whether he formally
resigns or merely assumes the mayoral office, after assum-
ing such office the person will act, not as a "resigning
member of the council," but as mayor pursuant to the
statutory powers and duties imposed upon such office.
We are not aware of any limitations on such powers flow-
ing from the fact that the person was formerly a council
member.
Furthermore, Minn. Stat. 4 412.02 subd, 2 plainly pro-
vides for vacancies to be filled by the mayor in the event
of a tie vote. Were we to determine that the new mayor
is precluded by Minn. Stat. § 415.15 (1976) from partici-
pating in the appointment of a successor, there would be
no means provided for the filling of such a vacancy in
the event of a tie vote. Therefore, it is our opinion that,
upon becoming mayor, the person in question will be
entitled, as mayor, to participate in the filling of the
vacancy in his former council seat.*.**
WARREN SPANNAUS, Attorney General
Kenneth E. Raschke, Jr., Assist. Atty. Gen.
0 See, Minn. Stat. § 412.191 (1976).
•• See, Minn. Stat. § 412.02 subd. 2 (1976).
000 See, e.g., Op. Atty. Gen. 471 -M, Dec. 11, 1967.
0000 We do note, however, that, were the councilman to
resign now, he would be precluded by section 415.15 from
participating in any selection of a successor prior to as-
suming the office of mayor in January of 1978. That task
would fall upon the current council and mayor. Prior to
January 1978 the person would have no status other than
resigning council member in those circumstances.
p
i
f
r
f
.ii
i
f
I
i 'O'Q'NO.L`JN1HSVdA
5184
'ON 11Wa3d
- QIVd
aodi.sod 's'n
O2iO MONdMON
Agenda Item VII.'n
WZ •:)•Q'uoi2urq -,n
•A&-N'anuaAV erueAjisuuad I K I
- aIMP -1 same io MSE-1 IeuoneN
aauw3Juoj AID- leuorssa SuoD 6861
same io an8eal IeuoneN
lb'NOISq'2ONOJ
.lVnNNV.
T
1
i
Agenda Item VII.'n
WZ •:)•Q'uoi2urq -,n
•A&-N'anuaAV erueAjisuuad I K I
- aIMP -1 same io MSE-1 IeuoneN
aauw3Juoj AID- leuorssa SuoD 6861
same io an8eal IeuoneN
lb'NOISq'2ONOJ
.lVnNNV.
T
1
t
r-------------------- - - - - -- --------------------------------------------
I
'-flON FORM
REGISfl�A
1
1
I
i
I
I
I Please type or print HOTEL. ACCOMMODATIONS RESERVATION REQUEST (Please type or print)
Name Sex M F ❑ Please make my hotel reservation as indicated below.
1 Title ❑ 1 do not require hotel accommodations.
1
I City or Organization
I To accommodate your s ped al needs, e. g., wheelchair accessible rooms.
please contact the Conference Registration Center.
Mailing Address
I
1
City
State Zip
I Telephone ( )
I Family Members Attending (No registration fee required):
_ I
Spouse Full Name
1 Child
1
Age
1
1 Child
j Age
I
Arrival Date / / Time
Departure date / / Time
1 w81 be sharing my room with:
Co-Occupant Name
Telephone( )
Sex M F CREDIT CARD AUTHORIZATION
Credit Card Company
Card Number
Bank Number
Expiration Date
Card Holder Signature
LldlC
1 1. ❑This is my First Congressional-City Conference.
2. ❑ 1 would like travel assistance from the NLC Conference Travel Center. Indicate your first -choice hotel with the number 1.
1
Check applicable Conference Registration fee and enter total fees in the f Number odor hotels from 2 to 12 in order of your
1 right hand column: preference. You mow nurnber all hotels
ADVANCE REGLSI'RAnON FEES
Choice Hotel
I (Postmarked by February 1, 1989)
Single
❑ $220 Direct Member Fee-
$
❑ $220 Associate Member Fee
$
❑ $295 Non - Member & indirect Member Fee"
$
j ❑ $295 Other—
I
$
I PRECONFERENCE SEMINARS AND SPECIAL EVEN73
❑ $85 Transition
$
❑ $85 Campaign Skills
$
1 ❑ $85 Environmental Programs
$
❑ $85 Real Estate Assets
$
❑ S85University Communities
1
$
I ❑ $85 Policy Leaders
S
❑ S50 Affordable Housing
1
S
Consult the Conference Registration Center for
informatton cm suites
Zip
The NLC Conference Regutnoon -
and/or the \LC Conference Tnvd Crntm
are auth=ed to use the above card to
guarantee my hotel nee saumt and/or to
issue..Ime trckers reserved by me to
..end this conference. 1 understand that
one night's room charge will be baled
through this card if I fail to show up for my
assigned housing on the confronted date
unless 1 have canceled my reservation with
the hotel at least 48 hours in advance. I also
understand that I may return any unused
-ackcs for o-nsl purchased by dus card for
full refund as a result of this anceflabM
urdm the fare terms published by the au.
Ivrc catty a cancellation perwry.
❑ $50 Cable Franchising $ TV
i❑ $22 Minority Caucus Coalition Breakfast $ CC
'On-site fee $255 after Febnary 1. 1989 II 1 l�r•
"Own fee $330 after February 1. 1989 Please his fm ..A
Make check payable for the total amount of the conference registration fees to: NLC Cm i—R"—,ar ore so t
1 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CI77ES P. n. Boa 17413
D.U. rr.emr..mal rdrpnm E., ..
I * Cancellation letters must be postmarked by February 17 and all Wa hm�. D c 20041
I .- Iladons are subject to a $30 cancellation fee. Pie s our nz i1ro s
1 * No telephone registrations or cancellations will be accepted.. F
1 '�'_•yt°.r. ;tin t tr�
I +FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: G I e A
r >• :.
i• V, � r .. (1.tir A�
PMK
RECI SUB YPE HTLBLK
.v.sr C
CODE ' d}8 C PMT AMT �TYPE, S ' -:
DFSC
All semloru S u`
will be held at the Z,
"""
Washington Hilton. _
Choice Hotel
Single
Double
rM
Dupont Plaza
(A)
125
125
ER
Embassy Row
(B)
132
148
IX
Embassy Square
(C)
104 -125
119 -140
FZ
Hay Adams
(D)
140 -165
140 -165
Highland
(E)
88
98
MB
Mayflower
(F)
109 -145
129 -155
CK
Omni Georgetown
(G)
105
125
RR
Quality Hotel Central
(H)
84
94
SA
Ritz-Cariton
(1)
145
165
UN
Sheraton Washington
(j)
89-99
109 -119
PL
Washington Hilton
(10
84124
104 -144
AH
Hilton Towers
(L)
175
195
❑ $50 Cable Franchising $ TV
i❑ $22 Minority Caucus Coalition Breakfast $ CC
'On-site fee $255 after Febnary 1. 1989 II 1 l�r•
"Own fee $330 after February 1. 1989 Please his fm ..A
Make check payable for the total amount of the conference registration fees to: NLC Cm i—R"—,ar ore so t
1 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CI77ES P. n. Boa 17413
D.U. rr.emr..mal rdrpnm E., ..
I * Cancellation letters must be postmarked by February 17 and all Wa hm�. D c 20041
I .- Iladons are subject to a $30 cancellation fee. Pie s our nz i1ro s
1 * No telephone registrations or cancellations will be accepted.. F
1 '�'_•yt°.r. ;tin t tr�
I +FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: G I e A
r >• :.
i• V, � r .. (1.tir A�
PMK
RECI SUB YPE HTLBLK
.v.sr C
CODE ' d}8 C PMT AMT �TYPE, S ' -:
DFSC
All semloru S u`
will be held at the Z,
"""
Washington Hilton. _
A
� ,.
r'
BEGINNING ANEW: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES
71" president and a new
Congress will soon begin laying out
the agenda for our next decade.
How they frame the issues- -and
how they meet them —may well sig-
nal a new era for the nation and our
cities and towns.
o THEN C & T
F R ATION S ITIES OWNS
The Congressional -City
Conference is your fast and best
opportunity to see what may be in
store for America's cities and towns.
And it's your first and best chance to
do something about it.
You need to be there. You need to
spot the key players—in the White
House, on the Hill, in the halls of the
agencies. You need to get to know
them and their positions. And you
need to make sure they understand
yours.
The first hundred days of any
presidency are the most critical.
During those crucial days, the new
president will set priorities, set forth
initiatives to lead the nation, devel-
op a relationship with Congress that
will shape our future, and submit a
new budget. New leaders in the
Congress will be setting their own
priorities and agendas.
There is no more important time
to be present than at the beginning.
The decisions of those first few days
and the reaction of the Congress will
set the tone for the remainder of the
presidency.
That's why you need to be at the
Congressional -City Conference. It's a
unique opportunity to.be in on the
beginning of a new administration —
and to represent your community
and its people during those impor-
tant first days. But it's more. It's an
opportunity to add your voice to
those of your colleagues and speak
for the public interest.
Two CENTRAL QUESTIONS
As we begin a new decade, a new
administration, and a new Congress,
we confront two central questions.
Where will our children live? We
need to know what role the federal
government will play in helping us
meet the shelter needs of our fami-
lies and children and in providing an
environment free of drugs, crime,
and AIDS.
How will they compete? We need
to feel secure that they will grow up .
to participate in an economy that is
competitive in world trade, that we
will be able to provide the infras-
tructure, education, and job training
they need.
SEVEN ISSUES
In the first hundred days of 1989, the
new president and Congress will
take up seven issues that will direct-
ly affect your community. At the
Congressional -City Conference,
you'll meet the key players on these
issues.
To FAR m, I7, OR
UP, UP AND AWAY?
The federal government spends
more on foreign aid than it does on
the nation's cities and towns. When
it decided in 1988 to increase spend-
ing on space, it did so at the
expense of some down -to -earth pro-
grams — municipal waste water con-
struction grants, homeless
assistance, the so-called war on
drugs, and the Urban Development
Action Grant program.
President Reagan's last budget
will, as required by the Gramm -
Rudman law, reduce the 1990 deficit
to no more than 5100 billion. The
new president's first budget presum-
ably will meet that same target.
But reducing the annual federal
deficit to $100 billion will require at
least $60 billion in spending cuts
and tax increases under the best of
circumstances —that is, assuming no
recession.
For the nation's cities and towns,
that involves fundamental questions
of fairness and hard questions about
priorities.
The budget decisions made in the
first hundred days will have a direct
bearing on your next budget• on the
scope of new and unfunded federal
mandates, and on our economy.
What are the specifics of
such a def7ctt reduction plan?
What would those specifics
mean for water and sewer
taxes? What would they mean
for our elementary schools?
What would they mean for our
property tax rate? What would
they mean for our roads and
bridges? What would they mean
for our authority to issue .
municipal bonds? How will they
affect our efforts to f7gbt drugs
and homelessness in our
streets?
TAX thus:
WASHINGTON WRrm 'EM,
I OrM PAY 'EM
The taxing of municipalities is a
growing part of Washington's annual
tax bill. In the first hundred days of
1989, the administration and
Congress will be shaping still anoth-
er tax bill to set a tone for the next
four years. At the same time. the
new tax bill will determine the direc-
tion of our own municipal rights.
Whether next year's tax bill will
be designed for deficit reduction,
technical corrections, extending
expiring programs, or to create new
tax breaks is uncertain.
What is certain, however. is that
the new Congress and administra-
tion will face fundamental choices
about the nation's cities and towns.
They can continue the steady pro-
cess of erosion of the past six years.
or they can restore some of our
rights and abilities to raise our own
revenues to meet national and local
needs and priorities.
Specifically, the new admaustra-
tion and Congress will have to
decide whether to:
• extend the mortgage revenue
bond program;
• extend the small issue industri-
al development bond program;
• extend the low income housing
credit program;
• extend the targeted jobs tax
credit program.
The new administration and
Congress will have to determine
whether to follow the course of
increasing mandated restrictions
upon our authority to issue tradition-
al governmental purpose municipal
bonds, or to set a new course to bet-
ter enable us to finance the cost of
building pre-primary schools, drug .
treatment centers. low income hous-
ing, and new investment in infras-
tructure.
The course they choose next
spring will directly affect each of us
and our ability to build and rebuild
our own communities.
What. specifically, is their position
with regard to municipal bonds?
If local governments cannot tax
the federal government, mill officials
from the new administration spell
out precisely whether and under
what circumstances the federal gov-
ernment can tax municipalities,
whether on the interest on our
bonds, or the gas for our police cars?
LIOUSING:
SHORT lbw SHELTER,
LANG TERM SOLE IION
On any given night, 100.000
American children are homeless on
the streets of our cities and towns,
says a report by the National
Academy of Science. And. the report
added. "The growing phenomenon
of homeless children is nothing
short of a national disgrace that must
be treated with the urgency such a
situation demands."
We need to rind out if the admin-
istration and Congress agree, and, if
they do, how they propose to end it.
Homelessness is almost uniquely
a municipal problem, cited as a
severe problem by more than half of
the cities responding to an NLC sur-
vey last year. How the new adminis-
tration and Congress respond next
year is of signal importance to
American cities —and more impor-
tant, to anyone young or old that
has no home.
Shelter is necessary, but it's only a
short tern answer. The long term
solutions lie in the development and
maintenance of low income and
affordable housing.
One of the fust issues of 1989 will
be reauthorization of the nation's
housing and community develop -
ment programs, which expire on
September 30, 1989. Key tax pro-
grams to leverage investment into
single and multifamily municipal
housing programs are also set to
expire.
The question of whether or how
to reauthorize comes, moreover, at a
time when homeownership has
gone beyond the reach of a growing
number of American families. it
comes as the nation will begin to
reap the grim harvest of eight years
of severe disinvestment in housing
opportunities. In the coming
decade, more than three million
contracts to provide federal housing
assistance to families are scheduled
to expire. Nothing is in place to
replace them.
A key part of the issue of where
our children will live will be deter-
mined by the tax and budget priori-
ties agreed to by the new Congress
and president. But beyond the ques-
tion of whether the nation is willing
to share in the goal of providing
decent, safe, and sanitary shelter for
all Americans is the question of how
such new policies and laws will be
shaped.
WW the new administration
and Congress support a rein -
vestment into housing oppor tu-
nnies, and if sit bow will they
pay?
What solutions will they pro-
pose to 'rival with the time
bomb?
How would they propose to
preserve existing assisted
housing?
What new programs would
they propose to provide bous-
ing opportunities?
What will the role of cities
and towns be in any new feder.
al bousing policy?
Do they support reautbo-
rization of the CDBG pro;ram,
and tf soy are they supporting
any changes? ,
ENVIRONM ENP:
FEDERAL LOCAL Costs
Whatever the concem —clean air,
transportation of hazardous materi-
als, medical syringes on public
beaches, sold 'waste disposal,
asbestos, or radon —the federal gov-
ernment is certain to reassure the
nation of its concern for health and
safety. Reassurance, however, isn't
all that's needed. The current EPA
administrator, Lee Thomas, warned
state and municipal officials last
spring that the 1990s will bring new
and more burdensome federal envi-
ronmental mandates to clean up the
ground, air, and water in our com-
munities. But the deficit and budget
priorities make it unlikely that the
1990s will bring any new federal
assistance.
Intemal EPA studies admit that the
cost of existing federal environmen-
tal mandates is beyond the fiscal
capacity of many small towns and
cities. There has been no systematic
effort to detemmne how our cities
and towns can finance these federal
requirements. There is, however, a
systematic and continual effort in
the Congress and at Treasury to
restrict cities' ability to issue the tax
exempt bonds with which to pay for
these mandates themselves.
in their first hundred days, the
new president and Congress will
return to the unfinished business of
clean air, acid rain, solid waste dis-
posal, transportation of hazardous
materials, and municipal incinera-
tors.
How much will these propos-
als cost? How can that cost be
met? Wig hazardous materials
transportation legislation pre-
empt municipal rights and
authority? Wbat options will we
have for solid waste disposal?
HumAN Dmiop mfr:
OVERDUE IIWFSPA ENIS
One of the most critical directions
the new administration and
Congress will consider is human
investment. After a decade in which
investment in debt and military pro-
curement have been our highest
spending priorities, the federal gov-
ernment will have to determine
whether it can afford not to invest in
its single most important resource:
the people who five in home towns
in every part of America.
In perhaps no area is our stake
greater. How these decisions are
made will determine the future of
not just our cities and towns, but our
country.
Poverty today is epidemic among
infants, children, and young fami-
fies. Three-fourths of all black chil-
dren, and one - fourth of all white
children, in our country spend at
least some time in poverty. By the
end of the next decade, more than
one -third of all school age children
in our cities and towns will be living
in poverty. These are the children
most at risk of never making it-or of
dropping out.
One million of our young people
drop out of high school every year.
In some inner city high schools half
of the students quit before they fin-
ish. Yet, by the year 2000, more than
half of all newly created jobs will
require at least some education
beyond high school.
Four out of every ten poor
Americans today are children. They
are the future Army, Navy, Marines
and Air Force. They are the workers
who will compete against the
Japanese, the Koreans, and the West
Germans. Yet if they are born into
poverty, the odds against them grow
with each day of their lives. Failure
to invest in today's children will
have a dangerously high cost for our
communities in years to come.
As the new administration and
Congress turn to human develop-
ment issues, they are almost certain
to return to the issues of child care,
parental leave, drug abuse, aids, and
universal access to some minimum
level of health care.
Human investment is an area in
which cities and towns have not had
a traditional relationship with the
federal government. But it is an area
in which we have perhaps the great-
est stake of any level of government.
Wig the administration pro-
pose programs to coordinate
and reinforce our own efforts?
Will they impose new and costly
mandates? Or will they bypass
cities and towns entirely?
And bow will the Congress
read? What bills to help our
children will be Congressional
priorities?
MAIL ORDER SAIFS TAm
NEW MUNICIPAL REVENUES
The new Congress will consider
legislation to authorize the collec-
tion of state and local sales taxes on
mail order catalog sales. This legisla-
tion would prevent erosion of local
tax bases and ensure fair competi-
tion for local businesses. It could
mean $500 million in additional rev-
enues for municipalities at no cost to
the federal government.
What are the bill's chances?
Who are the supporters w'
whom we can work? How
would the bill work !f enac,
e
In recent years, the federal govern-
ment has imposed an increasing
number of mandates through the
federal tax code on municipal bene-
fits from requiring mandatory
and payments of the federal
Medicare tax to the new rules under
Section 89 on employee benefits.
Wilt this trend continue?
What is the outlook of the new
administration with regard to
municipal employee benefits?
What new efforts are likely to
emerge In the Congress?
YOUR BEST CHANCE
The Congressional City- Conference
is your best chance to influence the
new administration and Congress.
Because policies of the new
administration and Congress will
have such a direct impact on your
city or town, whether through man-
dates or funding or successful pro-
grams to alleviate pressing
problems, it is important to draw out
each candidate and to take the time
to ask the hard questions.
STATE MUNICIPAL IFS
AcnVnIES
Dates and times vary. Consult ,
league director.
r L ,
L.," .
'PROGRAM IN BRIEF -: DATES TO
t 1,
,. advance regi;
SlWRDAY MARCH 11 .,,r request. All.
' `- P►p�.0/IfCrCRCC $¢nl%rrafS - r':.f - "`,alkyd by Ill
Environmental progras
Taking Charge 6Mm
ur i s `. ons after this date IMA,
Real Estate Assers `-
1 ,-iiOW TO REGLSTER
Transition: The In Roleof` s
ss : Minority Elected Officials register for the 1989`
VW
3,*Rolicy Leaders: Child Care , F'? Congressional�ity Conference,'.
°Xaljday seminars " c out the registration form and ieti
it with check or ci
'TCable Franchising mto a One- Y� tY Iw
ire Future?;' h r idea to the NLC Conferenc4
%::'Affordable Housing: Forwarding Registration Center,
responsive Strategy February 1, 1989.
SYeerin Committee Meetings
4Eachdelegate guest, s
9:00 am. - 12:00 noon ? 8 ,_member of the press, and any'iitl
.Human Development .'•x, ..., r ",conference paniclpant must rege
p ` ,; -
' Pransponation and Communications 'mere is no cliatge for spouse;'
Finance, Administration & Youth, or press registrations.) No
telephone re ' l
inn ovemmental Relations " .., ep ions or cancel]
g�
y lions will be accepted. Deadline I
1:30 p.m: - 4:30 p.m r.a 'r •'�.... -, -- —
6.00pm.- 7.30pm
I Welcoming Reception
MONDAY, MARCH 13
8:00 aam. - 9:30 a.m.. •.
Delegates' Breakfast-'
-10:00 a m. - 12:00 noc
`Legislative Workshop'd
r�12.30 p.m `2:OU p.m
� Delegates' Luncheon _
I � Legislative Workshops
nuNon nuteYt.;
s.r.., LOCAL EXCHANGE �
NLC's new electronic messaging
'.`database communications network-
TUESDAY, MARCH 14 r
Congressional appointments on
Capitol Hill. Shuttle bus service will
be provided from the Hilton Hotel
to the Capitol continuously until
10:00 a.m. Consult your league
director for scheduling congression-
al appointments. -
Local Exchange —is up and running.
A display will be open during regis=`
croon hours to answer questiohs
and demonstrate how you c2fs2ve
money and valuable time signing
on to Local Exchange. Local
Exchange will become the primary
electronic communications link for
local officials providing NLC, PTI
and ICMA databases, fax capability,
on -line conferencing, legislative
news and more. Training will be
available for subscribers to Local
Exchange who want to learn how to
maximize use of this service.
GUARANTEED LOWEST
AIR FARES
NLC Conference Travel Center guar-
antees to book you on the lowest
available air fare at the time of reser-
vations. This air fare may be a
restricted published discount or an
unpublished unrestricted special
negotiated fare, whichever best suits
your travel needs. Air fare discounts
could range from 5 percent off the
published Ultra -Saver with restric-
tions to the unpublished unrestricted
negotiated fare of 30 percent or
more off coach. For more informa-
tion call NLC Conference Travel
Center at (800) 368-3239 or (703)
471 -0460.
ADM*
SATURDAY, MARCH 11
PRE- CONFERENCE SEMEN ARS
AND SPECIAL EVENTS
Hone Your Electoral Campaign
Skills
9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
Registration fee. S85
This all -day seminar focuses on the
strategic and tactical skills that make
local elections cost - effective and
successful. The morning ses_ <ion,
devoted to elements of planting,
message development and choices
of communication channels. will
include the components of a cam-
paign, planning a strategy, message
development and communication
goals and organization and cam-
paign management techniques.
The afternoon session will cover
developing your information base
(home -grown or inexpensive public
opinion surveys, issue research and
opposition analysis), targeting direct
voter contact (phone, door- to-cloor
and mail). producing the media
(emphasis on print materials, with
discussion of radio and television
advertising) and raising the money
(techniques for funding a low -bud-
get campaign).
This seminar will be taught by two
Professional trainers with experi-
ence in municipal elections.
Developing New Strategies for
Environmental Programs
9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
Registration fee: $85
This allay workshop will review
existing federal environmental laws
and regulations, address some of the
most pressing environmental issues
and show you what other cities are
doing to reduce pollution, manage
municipal and industrial waste.
clean -up hazardous waste sites, and
implement integrated waste reduc-
tion programs. Participants will
learn how to develop strategies for
multi - layered cooperation and fund-
ing of these initiatives.
CE PROGRAM
Economic Development. Taking
Charge of Your City's Real Estate
9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
Registration fee.• $85
Publicly-owned real estate, from
strategic downtown parcels to
vacant building and land, is one of a
city's most valuable, yet underuti-
lized assets. This full day working
seminar will examine the types of
hidden opportunities found in pub -
lic real estate, techniques for assess -
ing resources and revenue potential
and strategies for developing a sys-
tematic approach to managing a
city's public real estate portfolio.
Transition The Increasing Role
of Minority Elected Officials
9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
Registration fee.• $85
During this full day seminar key offi-
cials will review and examine some
of the critical issues faced by minor_
ty local elected officials and discuss
how chingirig deinographics'will
factor into the new strategies that
will be necessary to effectively gov-
em at the local level.
Policy Leaders:
"Child Care- Growth for Cities
and Growth for Children"
9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
Registration fee.. $85
There is an increase in the demand
for high quality child care and other
child and family support services.
An increasing number of parents in
the workforce seek child care at or
close to their place of work.
Provision of child care services can
help workforce participants perform
their jobs more effectively. This all -
day session will examine how a city
can profit from high quality day
care. Specifically, participants will
examine zoning and land use poli-
cies, building and space considera-
tions, financing mechanisms and
other ways to encourage the avail -
ability and affordability of child care.
Affordable Housing:
Formulating a Responsive
strategy
1:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m.
Registration fee: $50
growing number of individuals and
families who are finding it more and
more difficult to obtain clean, safe
and affordable housing. There is
probably no single cause for the
housing problems communities
face, nor is there a single solution.
This session will examine several
community approaches to imple-
menting a successful housing pro-
grain. Participants will to learn about
several local strategies that have
been developed to increase the
availability and quality of low and
middle- income housing.
Cable Franchising into a One-
Wire Future?
2:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m.
Registration fee: $50
Fiberoptics and high tech electronics
will have the capacity to bring the-
atre quality pictures into every
home. This workshop will examine
issues local officials face in trying to
make the transition from their cur-
rent cable systems to those that!will
keep pace with a world economy
based on high speed information
transmission. Issues will include
cable transfers in ownership, fran-
chise renewals and telephone com-
pany entry into cable.
The University-Community
Connection Partnerships for
Progress
9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
Registration fee.. $85
Cities large and small are building
partnerships for progress with local
universities and colleges.
Communities and universities are
working together on cooperative
economic development effons, edu-
cation and training initiatives, stu-
dent behavior issues, planning
programs, cultural events, and other
endeavors. This seminar, sponsored
by NLC's University Communities
Caucus, will examine the founda-
tions of such pannerships and
explore a variety of university-com-
munity strategies for specific local
programs.
Minority Caucus Coalition
Breakfast
7:30 a.m. - 9:00 a.m.
Registration fee. $22 027 on-site)
Although the majority of Americans NLC's Minority Caucus Coalition
may be well housed, there is a (made up of the Asian Pacific
American Municipal Officials,
Hispanic Elected Local Officials,
National Black Caucus of Local
Elected Officials, and Women in
Municipal Government) will con-
vene its Sixth Annual Breakfast on
Sunday, March 12, from 7:30 a.m. to
9:00 a.m. A featured speaker will
address timely issues of common
concern. Everyone is invited to
attend.
qW_kVV'qM:Q1K9
Delegates' Luncheon: An administra-
tion official will address the confer-
ence on a key urban issue.
SUNDAY, MARCH 1Z
POLICY COMMITTEE MEETINGS
The Community and Economic
Development Committee will con-
tinue to monitor legislative activities
on the development of a federal
housing policy and its related issues..
Additionally, the committee will
review the pertinent issues within
economic development in order to
prepare comprehensive policy in
that area.
The Energy, Environment and
Natural Resources Committee
will continue to examine problems
posed by the statutory deadlines and
standards under the Clean Air Act
and Clean Water Act and will revise
existing NLC policy on these issues
where necessary. The committee
will also react to new federal regula-
tions implementing the Safe
Drinking Water Act, the Clean Water
Act, Superfund and the Hazardous
and Solid Waste Amendments of
1984. The committee also will begin
preliminary discussions on the envi-
ronmental impact of global warm-
ing.
The Finance, Administration
and Intergovernmental
Relations Committee will examine
the impact of declining federal funds
to cities and the accompanying rise
in mandated responsibilities. A con-
tinued emphasis will be the imposi-
tion of federally required labor
practices on municipal employers.
Federal tax and budget issues
impacting cities will remain as a
focus for the comminee's work.
0
7be Human Development
Committee will continue to monitor
legislative activities in the area of
parental leave, child care. minimum
wage and minimum health benefits
for employees and other related
issues. The committee will also
work to establish a comprehensive
drug policy.
The Transportation and
Communications Committee will
work on developing a comprehen-
sive position on the future of federal
highway and transit programs. The
committee will also begin a thor-
ough review of air safety and air
issues and update existing NLC
cy where necessary. Committee
members will also continue to moni-
tor and react to changes in cable
regulations.
MONDAY, MARCH
Breakfast Session: NLC's presi-
dent will outline the l eague's lobby=
ing priorities for 1989.
Workshops: Morning and after-
noon workshops will cover key leg-
islative and regulatory issues, the
important policy makers in Congress
and the executive branch, and the
points to emphasize in lobbying.
Delegates' Luncbeon: A congres-
sional leader will set out urban
viewpoints on key issues.
TUESDAY, MARCH 14
Visits to Capitol Hilt State
municipal leagues and individual
city officials will meet congressional
delegations to emphasize local
views on key issues.Consult your
league director about scheduling.
If you would like NLC to schedule
an appointment for you on the Hill
during the conference, call
(202) 626 -3020 before the meetinR-
Any appointments made by r%LC
must be confirmed before the n.
ing. Shuttle bus service will be pro-
vided from the Hilton Hotel to the
Capitol continuously until 10:00 a.m.
A.
ch
•'N�RPORN,S�O•
iBeB
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
KENNETH ROSLAND
Agenda Item #
V.F.
From:
CITY MANAGER
Consent
❑
MARCELLA DAEHN
CITY CLERK
Information Only
a
Date:
FEBRUARY 21, 1989
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
COUNCIL LIAISON
❑
To Council
RESPONSIBILITIES TO
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
Action.
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance.
FAI
Discussion
Recommendation:
Info /Background:
Attached are Council Liaison Responsibilities and times of meetings
as requested at the February 6, 1989 Council Meeting.
COUNCIL LIAISON RESPONSIBILITIES
2/21/89
MAYOR FRED RICHARDS (Previous to being elected Mayor)
Park Board - 2nd Tues, 7:30 PM, Manager's Conference Room
Human Relations Commission - 3rd Tues, 7:30 PM. Manager's Conference Room
Building Construction Appeals Board - meets on call - Edina City Hall
Edinborough Development Liaison
Advisory Boards and Commissions Policy
PEGGY KELLY
Art Center - 3rd Thursday, 7:30 PM, Art Center
Community Health Services Advisory Committee - meets on call four times
annually, Manager's Conference Room
Advisory Boards /Commissions Appointments Chair
AMM: Metro Agencies
Personnel Committee
South Hennepin Human Services Council - 4th Thurs each month, 7:30 -9:00 AM,
Normandale Lutheran Church, 6100 Normandale Av.
LMC: Development Strategies - June 7, 1:30 PM, Mpls. Hyatt Regency during the
Annual Conference, July 18, 1:30 PM, League of MN Cities Office - 183 Univ.
Av. E., St. Paul, August 22 & October 3, 1:30 PM. League of MN Cities
Office
Mayor Pro -Tem
(: YNN SMTTH
Recycling Commission - 3rd Thurs, 7:00 AM, Manager's Conference Room
Heritage Preservation Board - 4th Thurs, 7:30 PM, Manager's Conference Room
Board of Appeals and Adjustments - 1st & 3rd Thurs, 5:30 PM, Manager's
Conference Room
City /School Liaison - 2nd & 4th Mon, 7:00 PM, Community Center
Southwest Suburban Cable Commission - Quarterly, 1st Wed, 7:00 PM, Edina City
Hall
Edina Community Education Services Board
.TANF. PAULUS
I -494 Project Management Team - 2nd Wed. 9:00 AM, Richfield or Eden Prairie Cit_v
Hall
I -494 Joint Powers Organization - Same as above
JACK RICE
Municipal Legislative Commission - 1st Tues, 2:00 PM. Board Room of Messerli
Kramer - 3800 West 80th St., Bloomington
COUNCIL LIAISON RESPONSIBILITIES
FEBRUARY 21, 1989
PAGE TWO
RESPONSIBILITIES FORMERLY LISTED TO MR. COURTNEY AND MRS. TURNER
Personnel Committee
Mayor's Cable Program
Special Appearances
LMC: Program Planning Committee
Government Affairs Committee
AMM: Government Affairs Committee
Community Development & Planning Commission
Council Representative to Strategic Planning Process
Co -Chair - Edina School Board Community Services Task Force
AMM: Board Member
Housing Committee Chair
Metropolitan Task Force re: Effects of Baby Boom on Housing Market
�1
o e
O
`roAPORP�t
Itltltl
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Bob Kojetin, Director
Date: February 17,'1989
Subject:
EHS COMMENCEMENT EXERCISES
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # V.G.1
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
E To Council
Action 0 Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Jim Fee MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO COUNCIL TO HONOR THE SCHOOL
DISTRICT'S REQUEST TO CONDUCT THE 1989 COMPfENCEMENT EXERCISES.
IN THE.BRAEMAR WEST ARENA. Don Wineberg seconded.the motion.
MOTION CARRIED.
Info /Background:
With the attached Park Board discussion_and.motion, I recommend
to proceed with the 1989 commencement at the Braemar West Arena
building under the agreements between the City and the School
District for purchasing the Homosote to cover the ice and all
expenses as explained in the attached memorandum.
' From Edina Park Board Minutes
February 14, 1989
Request for use of Braemar West Arena
Mr. Thayer distributed a memo regarding Edina High School's request to use Braemar
Arena for 1989 commencement. He indicated the only modifications needed are removing
the glass and two 8 -foot sections of boards. He feels it is a goodwill factor on our
part. It is not a money -maker for us, but we can accommodate their request. In the
past, their alternative sites have been very small and not very nice. They will own
and store the floor covering.
Mr. Kojetin said the total capacity of the Arena would allow for about seven guests
per graduate which the School District feels is adequate. Mr. Thayer said they will
have to have very tight ticket control so they do not exceed the maximum of 3600
people.
Mr. Christianson confirmed that the School District will pay for all out -of- pocket
expenses i.e. employee preparation time, any modifications that will have to be made,
and they will provide the floor covering. Mr' Thayer said that is correct.
Mr. Jenkins asked what the arena is being used for at that time of year. Mr. Thayer
said our two facility ice season is normally down to one sheet of ice at that time of
year, so it is convenient to be shutting down one of the two.
Mr. Christianson indicated it is a goodwill factor and there is nothing out of our
budget.
Jim Fee MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO COUNCIL TO HONOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT'S REQUEST TO
CONDUCT THE 1989 COMMENCEMENT EXERCISES IN BRAEMAR ARENA. Don Wineberg seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ojetin introduced John Keprios to give an update and review the plans of the
d Van Valkenburg control building and fencing for the softball fields.
Ke eviewed the plans of the control building. He indicated the lack .s
to co the entire project with lights this year. Instead of instal ghts,
fencing, he building, we are going to accept bids on the buildin e
fencing. �' ance of 1989's capital dollars is $195,206. Mr. indicated
some archite drawings of the building. It will have a 1 meeting
room /concession n the ground floor with restrooms and age and mechanical
room. The upper 'll have scoring and control roo all three fields. The
entire building will ed and air conditioned.
Mr. Jenkins asked what the room will b or. Mr. Keprios said it will
be used for managers meetings, iation tournaments, trophy
distribution, concession area, e
Mr. Valliere asked if there are fu ble to make the meeting area larger. Mr.
Keprios said the proposed size ro badequate. It will also be used as an
eating and gathering place w being u meetings.
Mr. Keprios indicated icipated cost of the 'ng is $160,000 and the
fencing is $30 -40,00 could cost an additional 000 to light all three
fields. It could 316,000 to totally complete the ct; we are short
$120,000.
Mr. Chris n asked if the park will be operational without Mr. Keprios
said y will be operational.
etin mentioned we can install lighting one field at a time. We uild the
is into the budget. Without lights, two games can be played on each with
fights, four games can be played on each field.
- 5 -
S
.TV OF EDINA
7501 South County Road 18 • Edina, Minnesota 55435 • (612) 941 -1322
MEMORANDUM
TO: Edina Park Board and City Council
FROM: Larry Thayer, Manager - Braemar Arena
RE: Commencement Ceremonies at Braemar Arena
DATE: February 9, 1989
I have received a request to hold the 1989 commencement exercises at Braemar Arena.
Gordon Hughes and I have been in close communications with Jim Hamann, Director of
Business —Edina School District, and Bob Lynch, Principal —Edina High School, to finalize
details in order to host such an event at Braemar's West Arena. The event will not have a
rental fee involved, however the Edina High School will cover any costs incurred by the
arena's participation in the event. I felt it would be appropriate to seek your approval
regarding this event.
cc. Ken Rosland
Gordon Hughes
Bob Kojetin
Edina Park and Recreation Department
� A, �r\
C/sni
V/
may°
' •'��bAPO:V`��O •
1000
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City kouncil
From: Bob Kojetin, Director
Date: February 17, 1989
Subject:
SENIOR CENTER BUS TRANSPORTATION
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # V.G.2
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
0
To Council
Action ❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Don Wineberg moved THAT THE PARK BOARD WORK WITH THE SCHOOL
DISTRICT ON A FOUR -MONTH TRIAL BASIS TO RENT A BUS FOR SENIOR
CENTER TRANSPORTATION. Bill Lord seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED.
Info /Background:
With the attached Park Board discussion and .motion, I recommend
that we proceed with the Park Board's recommendation to have "a
trial bus route by renting school busses at $35 per day-for four
months for a total cost of $2800 which will come from the Park
and Recreation Department operating budget under the Senior
Citizens budget.
EDINA PARK BOARD
7:30 p.m.
February 14, 1989
Edina City Hall
MEMBERS PRESENT: Bob Christianson, Bill Lord, Andrew Montgomery, Bill Jenkins, Jim Fee,
f Jean Rydell, Mac Thayer, Don'Wineberg
MEMBERS ABSENT: Itti Furlong, Scott Johnson
STAFF PRESENT: Bob Kojetin, John Keprios, Susan Weigle, Larry Thayer, John Valliere,
Stacey Kness
OTHERS PRESENT: Joanne Demco, Roseann Anderson, Margit Ferguson, Elsie Hoffharber,
Tass von Schmidt -Pauli
Bob Christianson called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
I. APPROVAL OF JANUARY 10, 1989, MEETING MINUTES
Jean Rydell MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE JANUARY 10, 1989, MEETING. Mac
Thayer seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
II. SENIOR CENTER BUS TRANSPORTATION
Susan Weigle, Senior Center Coordinator, stated the new Senior Center location is
acceptable, but many people cannot get there. Ms. Weigle proposed to the Park Board
to recommend increasing the transportation program to get the seniors to the Center
for congregate dining. Ms. Weigle then introduced Joanne Demco of Volunteers of
America, the organization running the congregate dining program. Mrs. Demco stated
congregate dining enables seniors to get out of the house. Volunteers of America has
been offering this service in Edina for 11 years. Last year they served 22,000 meals
to people of which approximately 30 percent are below the poverty level in Edina. The
suggested donation is $1.25 for each congregate meal. The majority of congregate
diners is quite old and frail. The average age throughout the Anoka - Hennepin area is
74 years; the average age in Edina is 77 years. Congregate dining is an opportunity
for people.to come together to have lunch which is more like a dinner. For many
people it is the main meal of the day; most come for socialization. Volunteers of
America's funding comes from Metropolitan Council. Mrs. Demco is encouraged with the
new Senior Center location, but the key to a successful congregate dining program is
transportation. She strongly urged the Park Board to consider the request.
Mr. Jenkins asked if there were transportation problems at the previous site. Mrs.
Demco answered we were in a high rise area with many seniors close by, so there was
not the same problem. We were serving 90 people per day.
Mr. Christianson asked how many people are being served now. Mrs. Demco said
congregate dining has only been offered for a week at the new site, so averages have
not been figured. Approximately 30 people have attended each day.
Mr. Wineberg asked how many programs does Volunteers of America serve. Mrs. Demco
said congregate dining is being offered at 42 locations.
Mr. Christianson asked if the numbers of people are down because . of the new
location. Elsie Hoffharber, the congregate dining coordinator at the Senior Center,
indicated she had looked through old records to see how many people had come from the
large complexes on York Avenue. Transportation was easy at that time. Many people
would love to come from the York Avenue area but cannot get to the new Center. Of
- 1 -
From Edina Park Board Minutes
February 14, 1989
the present participants, many people drive or live in the immediate neighborhood.
Those who need the congregate dining service the most are the ones now who cannot
come.
Mr. Kojetin indicated the City will be subsidizing 20 cents per meal instead of the
originally proposed 50 cents per meal. Mr. Kojetin has contacted the School District
to discuss the cost per day of renting a bus to transport people in the York Avenue
area (7200 York, 7400 York, 3400 Parklawn, 7500 York, and 7151 York) to and from the
Center. Approximately 54 people have expressed a need for rides to the center and
back each day. The School District would charge $35 per day for a school bus which
can accommodate 50 people. The per day rate comes to $9100 per year since meals are
served 260 days per year. Mr. Kojetin indicated several different options for this
need. We could consider charging 50 cents daily which would lower the yearly cost to
$2800. If this is favorable, we could be looking at an increase in our operating
budget. The present bus holds ten people and makes three runs to average 27 people
per day being transported to and from the Center. This bus picks up people in
isolated areas of the City that are not close'-to the York Avenue area.
Ms. Weigle said there are 60 new members since we have opened. 80 percent of the new
members have been in the 55424 and 55436 zip code areas of the city.
Mr. Christianson asked if there is a charge for the present bus. Ms. Weigle said no,
and we use volunteer drivers.
Mrs. Rydell asked how many people using congregate dining live below the poverty
level. Mrs. Demco said if people were coming from the York Avenue side of town, a
charge for the bus could be a problem for them.
Mr. Wineberg said there could be a problem with one bus charging and the other bus
being free.
Mr. Christianson asked if there are any other sources of funds available such as
grants. Mrs. Demco said she does not have money in her budget, but the West Metro
Transportation project does have some funds for other communities.
Mr. Christianson asked if it is possible to contact them for funding. Mrs. Demco
said it would take about a year to go through the request process.
Ms. Weigle indicated Paratransit charges $10 per year and $1 each way for handicapped
riders.
Mr. Christianson said if we received funding from West Metro, we could not charge
anything but there could be a suggested donation. Mrs. Demco said sometimes West
Metro gives qualifying cities a van, and the city has to come up with a driver. They
have limited dollars.
Mr. Christianson asked Mrs. Demco if a charge was levied for bus transportation and
if it caused the participants to make a smaller donation to the congregate dining
program, would it adversely affect your program. Mrs. Demco said her grant would
absorb it because they feel the program is beneficial.
Mr. Jenkins asked what is the largest number of people you could serve. Mrs. Demco
said 100.
Mr. Kojetin asked Elsie if there had been any comment on the Center being located on
the third floor. Elsie said she has not heard any negative comments on the
location. People are just glad there is a center available. Mr. Kojetin added the
handicap accessible elevator could be completed by May 15.
- 2 -
From Edina Park Board Minutes
February 14, 1989
Mr. Jenkins asked if there is a pocket of seniors in the City we could be missing.
Mr. Kojetin said the Summit Hill complex may be interested.
Roseann Anderson, active Senior Center member, indicated many people in the 7151 York
building are unhappy with the re- location. There are 55 people from the 7151
building who attended congregate dining regularly. They would be happy to do it
again since congregate dining brightens their day.
Ms. Weigle shared some examples of individuals who benefit greatly from congregate
dining who depend on outside transportation to get to the Senior Center.
Mr. Christianson said there are several questions to be answered: do we proceed with
transportation; on what basis; and how long.
Mr. Lord asked if there are any funds in the Park and Recreation budget that could be
utilized: Mr. Kojetin said there could be $3,000 available to go towards a
transportation program.
Mr. Christianson suggested subsidizing a program on a trial basis and continued
trying to get funds then revisit the issue.
Mr. Montgomery asked if Ms. Weigle had solicited churches for any contributions. Ms.
Weigle said we do count on churches for people from the VEAP program.
Mr. Jenkins said $3000 is a full year at 50 cents per person per ride. Is it an
option to run the bus for four months without charging the riders while we consider
other revenue sources.
Ms. Weigle said she would like to see what happens if we establish a trial
transportation program. Mrs. Demco said four moths would give us the opportunity to
prove we have a need when considering other options.
Don Wineberg moved THAT THE PARK BOARD WORK WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICT ON A FOUR -MONTH
TRIAL BASIS TO RENT A BUS FOR SENIOR CENTER TRANSPORTATION. Bill Lord seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Mr. Christianson added the four months must be used as an opportunity to explore
other options, monitor how the service is being used, and report back to the Park
Board after three months so we can see where the program is. Possibly in meantime
the city staff can investigate some other sources of revenue outside of our annual
budget.
Mr. Keprios said if the future brings free transportation for the able bodies, how
will the handicapped population respond. Mr. Christianson said but they use special
equipment and they are taken to wherever they want to go. That really is a different
situation not to be compared with our situation.
. 'buted a sheet with several suggested plan
asked tha ed as a suggestion. ar Board
members to think a s and cuss them at the next
meeting.
IV. GOLF COURSE UPDATE
Mr. Kojetin ind' inal layout has not yet Mr. Valliere
said we a o come up with a plan that will please a s (Corps
of atershed District, and the Department of Natural Reso
roblems stem from the hill on the east side of the ridge.
- 3 -
0
o( e `�
ch
0
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
CITY COUNCIL
Agenda Item #
yI
From:
MAYOR FREDERICK RICHARDS
Consent
❑
Information Only
0
Date:
FEBRUARY 21, 1989
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
[11
To Council
Letter Regarding
Airport Expansion
Action
❑
Motion
from the City of
.
Bloomington
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Info /Background:
See attached letter from the City of Bloomington regarding
Airport Expansion.
0
ri
Ucity of
bloomington, minnesota
Municipal Building • 2215 West Old Shakopee Road • Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 -3096 • (612) 881 -5811
February 15, 1989
Mr. Ken Rosland
Manager
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Ken:
Bloomington and Richfield have been discussing the "dual track"
strategy recommended by the Metropolitan Council's Airport Adequacy
Task Force, approved by the Metropolitan Council, and apparently, by
the Metropolitan Airports Commission. It is felt necessary to conduct
a professional study to show the inadequacies of the Adequacy Task
Force's report. The staffs of the two cities have proposed a $100,000,
or so, study with the costs to be paid by the two cities proportionate
to their respective populations.
The City Council of Bloomington has directed that the Cities of
Burnsville, Eagan, Mendota Heights, Eden Prairie, Edina and Minnetonka
be contacted to see if they would support such a study. Therefore,
this letter to you. Your money is important, but far more, in the
opinion of the City Council, is the clout you and your city would
bring.
It is anticipated that the study would involve employment of a
consultant who would examine what-has been done to date and that a
panel of experts would then be assembled to critique the study and
raise questions. These, then, would be examined and developed and some
time later the panel would reconvene for a final consideration and
report. It is hoped that a target date of October or early November
1989 could be met in order to have some influence on the 1990
Legislature. It is that session when it is believed the main fight
will take place; the fight over whether a new runway be constructed at
the airport or whether landbanking be implemented.
You have probably received a copy, or a summary, of the Adequacy Task
Force Report. I was on the Task Force as was Jim Prossser of
Richfield. I am enclosing a copy of my objections to that report
which, generally, set forth my view and not, necessarily, those of the
City Council.
AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION /EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf: (612) 887 -9677
b
Mr. Ken Rosland
February 15, 1989
Page 2
I would like to discuss. this with you. Would you please call my office
and inform me whether you can attend a luncheon meeting at the
Decathlon on Wednesday, February 22.
Thank you.
Very tr yours,
G Pidgeon
Ci Manager
JGP /et
Enclosure
a
Y
OBJECTION TO THE REPORT OF
MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
ADEQUACY TASK FORCE
TO THE
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
by John G. Pidgeon
October 13, 1988
(Revised October 26, 1988)
r'
It is with some sense of regret that I am compelled to express dissatisfac-
tion and disagreement with the October Report of the Minneapolis -St. Paul Inter-
national Airport Adequacy Study Advisory Task Force. I have admired the
obvious sincerity, dedication and competence of the task force members and
staff.
I am employed as Manager for the City of Bloomington but I would stress
that I speak for myself and not as a spokesman for that city. Bloomington,
perhaps more than any other city in the metropolitan area, has in the past
several decades developed with the Metropolitan Airport. Airport related
business, including a significant hotel and hospitality industry, has developed,
and prospered, in Bloomington in large part because of the airport. The airport
has in turn developed in part because of the demand created by business develop-
ment in the metropolitan area, particularly Bloomington and other nearby cities.
A very large number of Bloomington residents are employed at the airport or in
airport related and located businesses and industries. The closure of the
airport, the move of the airport, will have a traumatic adverse effect on
Bloomington - more so than on most other cities. A long distance move will
uproot many Bloomington households. Real damage will have been done.
While the addition of the recommended north -south runway may postpone a
determination of "inadequacy" and prolong MSP's useful life, there will be
adverse impacts. These, largely, will be suffered by Richfield and Bloomington
residents.
The uncertainty of a move, a tentative decision to landbank for the present
and move later - maybe - will also likely cause injury to areas near the airport
and to airport related business as uncertainty causes delay in investment in the
area and in airport related business and industry and postponement of ever
needed improvements, additions and upgraded facilities. In summary, Bloomington
age 1
hurts if the airport moves, if it is expanded, if the two -track system is
pursued.
The task force convened a reuse panel which predicts a rosy future for the
3,000 plus airport acres expected to be abandoned. But having been involved
these past ten years in the attempted redevelopment of a mere 100 -acre abandoned
stadium site, the reality of that rosy prediction is viewed as being far far
away.
There can, of course, be no certainty at this time as to the eventual
location of any new airport.
Among the factors which are recommended to be monitored is economic growth
of the metropolitan area. If that growth does not occur, a new airport will
probably not be needed. If it does occur, an expansion of the developed part of
the metropolitan area will in all likelihood also have occurred. That develop-
ment will likely insure, if the new airport land designation is postponed, that
suitable vacant land may be even farther removed from the existing site -
farther from Bloomington. There is no attractive alternative.
Few would gainsay the importance of aviation and a good airport system to
the economic well being of this Metropolitan area. Only at Atlanta with 250%
the enplanements of MSP are we told of any experiment in land banking. With the
rare exceptions of Denver and Austin, we are not apprised of new airport
development imminent. We are, rather, told that the nation's airport system is
under stress, that some fifteen major airports have worse congestion and some
twenty -four have populations greater in number that are within the severely
noise impacted Ldn 65 contour. Relatively we are in fair shape. But we are
part of a system. We do not - cannot - stand alone.
If traffic can't grow elsewhere it won't grow here.
The analyses of costs and benefits, referred to in the discussion of Trans-
portation Cost and Benefits were cursory to say the least. The so- called
"benefits" examined were of time and therefore, money, saved - in the air or, at
Page 2
least, in a plane, for the travelling airline public and for the airlines zm%dT...
No examination was made, for example, of the benefit of jobs
that might be gained. The "costs" examined were confined to land acquisition
and airport construction. No consideration for the possibility of workers and
their families being uprooted, or, in the alternative of, perhaps, unknown
hundreds of thousands of miles being added to the work trek. No consideration
of decreased property values resulting from the recommended new runways at Wold
Chamberlain. No consideration for the artificially advanced obsolescence of
some airport related commercial and industrial business. No consideration of a
whole host of costs in both dollar and human terms that would follow such a
move.
The question of finance is but touched in the Draft Report. It is touched
again in the October 6 Kari -Dr. Maki memo. Perhaps another task force will
expand and elaborate. It is truly significant. Here again, we are adversely
impacted because of the ambiguity of the recommendation. The expense of
landbanking, although it may not be "a significant factor" nevertheless will
require a huge expenditure. As I understand it, inasmuch as the land
acquisition would occur prior to a firm decision to move, neither the Airport
Trust Fund nor the airlines, nor the airline users, could be expected to pay
that bill in addition to the ongoing operation costs at the existing facility as
well as several hundreds of millions of new capital expenditures at Wold
Chamberlain. It will fall, then, on others. Who? How?
That "other" task force, in addition to making a more comprehensive study
and precise recommendations on the financing of land acquisition and new airport
construction, or perhaps still some other task force, needs be charged with the
obligation of how we are to finance our presently needed highways in addition to
those that will be needed to serve the new airport as well as the new economic
development which is presumed, it is predicted, makes a new airport necessary.
Today we see existing highway resources being barely sufficient for maintenance.
Page 3
We see cities, and the Metropolitan Council itself, advancing funds for highway
studies because the State has insufficient resources available. We see cities
advancing funds for construction, and for replacement. We see a multitude of
outmoded and decrepit bridges to be replaced, millions of dollars of necessary
improvements unable to be timely made.
In short, we see a whole transportation system without sufficient
financing. Air transportation needs to be viewed and considered as a part of a
greater problem.
The so- called Dual Track strategy at first blush is very attractive. It
seems the epitome of-reasonableness. It promises hope of ultimate relief for
the noise impacted opponents of the present operation. It promises growth to
development minded economic interests. It promises jobs for the construction
industry. It promises profits for the bankers and money interests. It promises
the delightful exercise of power to some particular interests, (and yes, the
opportunity to carp and criticize by some so minded). Vested interests need not
join the battle for survival - yet. Difficult financial questions can
apparently be set aside for the present - those that deal not only with the
landbanking investment but also, and probably much more expensively, the land
transportation facilities which will be required - which already in this area
exceed our ability to provide. (No mention of which occurred in the Cost
Benefit Analysis.)
The Dual Track recommendation has a lot to offer - on paper.
But in the real world I suspect hindsight will consider it but a
subterfuge. How can millions be spent for a landbank and then, simultaneously
hundreds of millions more poured into the existing site with everyone knowing
full well that the latter improvements and additions are but temporary? What
will be the result of the EIS for the additional runways at the existing site
when everyone knows that down the road lies a new 13,000 acre site? Once the
landbanking strategy is initiated, it seems that the only logical site, the most
Page 4
reasonable "alternative" to be explored in that EIS for any new runway will be
at that new site. Those who decry the existing airport will have won. Those
who would alter this throwaway society will insist on the long term dedication
and utilization of the investment in the so- called land bank when they come to
the realization that the existing airport with its investment is to be thrown
away. In effect, a decision by default.
In my judgement, this Adequacy Task Force has performed an invaluable first
study. We have all been made aware that there is a strong possibility, very
strong, that there may be a significant problem that needs to be addressed a few
years hence. Within the next few years, after there is an opportunity to
monitor the predictions and projections developed in this study as well as those
in the concomitant MAC study, after we see if there is a consistent growth
trend, after the airlines have a reasonable length of time to accustom
themselves to deregulation and a more free business environment, after there is
sufficient time to develop strategies to increase efficiencies, to develop plans
to more adequately utilize airplane and airport capacity and to eliminate
duplicative flights, the next task force can address the question of the need
for expanded facilities. If the answer is yes, then a definitive answer need be
made - expansion of the existing development or development of a new.
In the meantime, and in response to the Legislative directive, the Task
Force should recommend to the Council that they advise the Legislature that it
appears that the implementation of "demand management techniques," including
"peak hour" expansion to "peak period," the removal by MAC of corporate and
other general aviation, and with the utilization of the best technology that may
be available, the existing airport is reasonably capacious for the near term;
that if, as the Task Force predicts, there is a high probability that demand
will increase, the existing airport will either have to have increased capacity
or will have to be relocated.
Page 5
s
A.
Cn
i89B
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To: Kenneth Rosland
From: David A. Velde
Date: February 21, 1989
subject: Funding proposals for
public water supply
monitoring and testing;
Minnesota Department
of Health
Recommendation:
Info /Background:
Agenda Item #
Consent
❑
Information Only
0
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
❑
To Council
Action.
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
The Minnesota Department of Health will be performing additional public water
supply monitoring and testing as a result of the Safe Drinking Water Act
amendments. The cost of additional monitoring and testing will be passed on
to the public water supply operator. The attached memorandum discusses this
issue and the proposed funding options.
The cost implications for Edina under each of the funding option described
on page two of their memorandum are as follows:
2a. Cost of Service Fee - $830 to $3500
2b. $3.20 per service connection - $44,800
2c. $0.021 per 1000 gals. - $73,900
2d. Operating fee - $1300 - $4200"
The Minnesota Department of Health is recommending option 2b ($3.20 per service
connection) as the preferred method of funding the public water supply monitoring
and testing program.
The Minnesota League of Cities believes the funding for this program should be
supported by general fund appropriation. They believe the benefit derived from
the increased monitoring and testing will extend beyond the users of public
water supplies. The League suggested that we contact our legislators about
this concern.
minnesota department of health
717 s.e. delaware st. p.o. box 9441 minneapolis 55440
(612) 623.5000
MEMORANDUM
DATE . January 20, 1989
TO City Council /Town Board /Rural Water Supply /System Operator
FROM Gary L. Englund, P.E., Chief
_Section of Water Supply
and Engineering
SUBJECT: Report to the 1989 Legislature, Proposals for Alternative Funding
for Water Supply Monitoring and Surveillance in Minnesota
By way of this notice, the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) wants to alert
you to proposals that will be considered by the 1989 Legislature on funding
for public water supply monitoring. As the owner and /or operator of a pub-
lic water supply system you will be directly affected by the outcome of the
Legislature's deliberations in this matter. The following is a brief sum-
mary of the report including the costs that will be incurred b public water
supplies as a result,of the 1986 Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA� amendments and
the funding alternatives submitted to the Legislature by MDH to cover these
costs.
4
As the state agency responsible for protecting and monitoring public drinking
water supplies in Minnesota, the MDH submitted a request to the 1988 Legisla-
ture for support of a significantly expanded program, which included funding
for 15 new positions and support for laboratory services. The funding request
was based on 1) the need to provide greatly expanded monitoring of public
water supplies due to the concern for the occurrence of many man -made chemi-
cals in drinking water and 2) the federal 1986 SDWA amendments that require
public water supplies to greatly.expand the monitoring performed on their
drinking water. The 1988 Legislature directed the MDH to report back to it
prior to the 1989 session with proposals for funding the drinking water pro-
gram in the future.
Background
There are 12,000 public water supply systems in Minnesota divided into three
categories: community (1,000), nontransient noncommunity (1,665), and noncom -
munity (9,305) systems. The noncommunity systems require minimal testing.
However, community (such as yours) and nontransient noncommunity systems will
be required to test for 83 contaminants compared to the 22 presently
monitored. MDH has estimated that the annual average cost to each community
and nontransient noncommunity water system will be $830, with some systems
incurring annual costs of up to $3,500 because of the highly variable monitor-
ing frequencies. To fully fund the MDH drinking water program, including the
an equal opportunity employer
City Council /Town Board/ -2- January 20, 1989
Rural Water Supply /System Operator
cost of all required water analyses, requires approximately $3 million per
year.
The funding options for the drinking water program contained in the report are
as follows:
1. General Fund. Every taxpayer contributes to this fund and most state
programs use this as their source of funding, therefore there is consider-
able competition for these funds. -The Commissioner's Drinking Water Task
Force recommended that the program be supported by general fund
appropriation.
2. Revenue - Generating Options.
a. Cost -of- Service Fee for Water Testing and Inspection for Each Public
Water Supply. Cost per person per year ranges from $33.20 (small
systems) to $.002 (very large systems).
b. Service Connection Fee for Each Customer Connected to a Community
Water Supply., Annual fee of $3.20 per water service connection
would generate sufficient revenue to support the program.
C. Fee Based on the Quantity of Water Used by Each Customer of a Commu-
nity Water Supply. A fee of $.021 per 1,000 gallons of water used
would generate sufficient revenue.
d. Operatin Fee. Annual fee based on a sliding scale: noncommunity
systems ?100 or $200 and community systems $1.,300 (less than
100 persons served) to $4,200 (greater than 100,000 persons served).
e. Combination of One or More of the Above.
MDH, in its report, is recommending the annual service connection fee as the
preferred funding alternative, because it is reasonably equitable, easy to
administer and assures a stable funding source. A bill imposing this fee will
be submitted as part of the Governor's legislative package.
It is important to note that both federal and state rules place the responsi-
bility of water quality monitoring on the individual water systems. Thus,
if the Legislature takes no action on funding the state drinking water program
as _outlined, the responsibility for monitoring water quality and the associ-
ated costs will then be borne by the public water systems.
The Legislature will be discussing water supply funding during the current
session. Since every public water supply system in the state is affected, we
would encourage you to contact your state legislators and let your feelings be
known on the funding alternatives being considered. If you would like to
receive a copy of the complete report, please contact me at 612/623 -5330 or
Dick Clark at 612/623 -5227.
GLE:RDC:ter
11K
O e
Cn
v � ay
•' ~�bRPOMt�O•
�eeB
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: THE CITY COUNCIL
From: GORDON L. HUGHES
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
Date: FEBRUARY 21, 1989
Subject:
CALL FOR SALE OF
VARIOUS BOND ISSUES
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
IX.A.B.C.D.
Consent
❑
Information Only
Fx-]
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
0
To Council
Action.
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Adopt the attached Resolutions calling for sale of Bonds.
Info /Background:
Attached for your review is the pre -sale report by Public Financial
Systems. This report summarizes the four bond issues and present
market conditions that will affect the sale of these bonds. Particularly
for the benefit of the new City Council Members, we wish to provide the
following information to put these bond issues into perspective.
TAX INCREMENT BONDS:
Tax increment bonds are all related to the Centennial Lakes development
project. The first stage of the Centennial Lakes bonds were sold in
October of 1988 and were used to purchase the property and grade the site.
This second stage of Centennial Lakes bonding will finance the cost of
various park and other public improvements associated with Phase I of the
Centennial Lakes project. The second stage of the bond issue has been
delayed until now in order to reduce interest cost - associated with the
bonds. No public improvements beyond the Phase I Centennial Lakes project
will be funded by the bonds.
Two tax increment issues are involved in this project, a taxable issue and.
a tax exempt.-issue. The tax exempt issue will be used for park and other
Edina City Council
February 21, 1989
Page Two
public improvements. The taxable issue will be used for improvements to
benefit the housing.for the site.
IMPROVEMENT BONDS:
The'City periodically sells improvement bonds to finance public
improvements which are then repaid by special assessments. The proposed
improvement bonds will principally be used for public streets and
utilities at Centennial Lakes. These bonds will be repaid by special
assessments levied against the private developers of Centennial Lakes.
RECREATIONAL FACILITIES BONDS:
On August 1, 1988, the City Council approved construction of a nine -hole
addition to Braemar Golf Course, subject to bids to be awarded after a
bond sale. (copy of minutes attached. This action was taken in
conjunction with approval of the arena improvements and the purchase of
the Edina Golf Dome.
Pursuant to a special law, Recreational*Facility Bonds in Edina may be
sold as General Obligation Bonds and are repaid by revenues from the
recreation facilities. If such revenues are insufficient, revenues from
the Municipal Liquor Stores may be pledged for bond repayment.
Staff and the Park Board presented estimated revenues last August,
showing the Braemar Recreation Facilities will support the debt service
of all proposed bonds. The following schedule combines the debt service
schedule from Public Financial Systems report with staff's estimated
revenues from all Braemar facilities.
See Exhibit "A" attached
Edina City Council
February 21, 1989
Page Three
The Park Board is presently reviewing plans for the golf course expansion which will
be presented to the City Council prior to bidding.
SCHEDULE:
If the City Council adopts the enclosed Resolutions on February 21.
1989, we expect,to follow the following timetable for issuance of bonds.
FEBRUARY 21 COUNCIL ACTION TO INITIATE SALE PROCESS
WEEK OF FEBRUARY 21 OFFICIAL STATEMENT PREPARATION
NOTICE OF SALE DISTRIBUTION
RATING INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION
WEEK OF MARCH 6 OFFICIAL STATEMENT PRINTED /DISTRIBUTED
RATING ISSUES RESOLVED
WEEK OF MARCH 13 MARKET DEVELOPMENT
RATING RELEASED
MARCH 20 BOND SALE
WEEK OF APRIL 10 CLOSING (ESTIMATED)
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF EDINA
ESTIMATED INCOME AVAILABLE FOR BOND PAYMENTS
FEBRUARY 21, 1989
* - ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ARE BEFORE DEPRECIATION AND BOND PAYMENTS
NEW 9-
ARENA GOLF DOME
GOLF COURSE
HOLE COURSE
TOTAL
REVENUES $438,000 $225,000
$1,149,000
$443,000
EXPENDITURES* 402,000 98,000
7,6,000
148,000
INCOME $ 36,000 $127,000
-- - - - - -- -- - - - - --
-------- -- - - - - --
$ 413,000
---- - - - - --
---- - - - - --
$295,000
-- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
$871,000
COMMITMENT FROM:
EDINA HOCKEY ASSOCIATION
BRAEMAR FIGURE SKATING CLUB
BRAEMAR SKATING LESSONS
CAPITAL PLAN
25,000
ANNUAL INCOME AVAILABLE FOR BOND PAYMENTS
896,000
TOTAL PAYMENTS
NUMBER OF YEARS
AVERAGE ANNUAL
BOND PAYMENTS $11,040,845
TWENTY (20)
552,000
EXCESS INCOME OVER
ANNUAL BOND PAYMENTS
$344,000
* - ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ARE BEFORE DEPRECIATION AND BOND PAYMENTS
- CERTIFICATE OF MINUTES RELATING TO
$2,100,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
RECREATIONAL FACILITIES BONDS, SERIES 1989
Issuer: City of Edina, Minnesota
Governing Body: City.Council
Kind, date, time and place of meeting: a regular meeting,
held on February 21, 1989, at 7:00 o'clock P.M.,
at the City Hall in the City of Edina, Minnesota
Members present:
Members absent:
Documents attached:
Minutes of said meeting (pages): 1 through 2, including
RESOLUTION RELATING TO $2,100,000 GENERAL
OBLIGATION RECREATIONAL FACILITY BONDS,
SERIES 1989; AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND
PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLIC SALE THEREOF
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and
acting recording officer of the public corporation issuing the
obligations referred to in the title of this certificate,
certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above,
have been carefully compared with the original records of said
corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been
transcribed; that said documents are a correct and complete
transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of
said corporation, and correct and complete copies of all
resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents
approved by the governing body at said meeting, so far as they
relate to said obligations; and that said meeting was duly held
by the governing body at the time and place and was attended
throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and
notice of such meeting given as required by law.
WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer
this day of , 1989.
Signature
Marcella M.- Daehn, City Clerk
(SEAL) Name and Title
Member. introduced the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION RELATING TO $2,100,000 GENERAL
OBLIGATION RECREATIONAL FACILITY BONDS,
SERIES 1989; AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND
PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLIC SALE THEREOF
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Edina, Minnesota, as follows:
1. Authorization. It is hereby determined that it is
necessary and beneficial for the City "to construct improvements
to the municipal golf course and ice arena. This Council
further determines that in order to finance this acquisition
and betterment of recreational facilities for the City, it is
necessary for the City to issue and sell its General Obligation
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 1989 in the principal
amount of $2,100,000 (the Bonds) pursuant to Minnesota Laws
1961, Chapter 655, and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, $31,000
of such amount representing.interest as provided in Minnesota
Statutes, Section 475.56. This Council estimates that the net
revenues derived from the operation of the municipal golf
course; the municipal ice arena and the municipal liquor
stores, in excess of the cost of operation and maintenance
thereof, in the fiscal year which ended December 31, 1988,
equals or exceeds the maximum amount of principal and interest
to become due in any future fiscal year on all of the
outstanding General Obligation Golf Course Bonds, Series 1985
of the City, dated as of September 1, 1985, on all of the
outstanding General Obligation Recreational Facility Bonds,
Series 1988, dated as of October 1, 1988, and on the Bonds, as
proposed to be issued under the terms set forth in this
Resolution. Prior to the delivery of the Bonds to the
purchaser, the Council will establish a fund for the payment of
principal and interest on the Bonds. The Council will
appropriate and credit to such fund an amount of revenues of
the municipal liquor stores which is equal to the average
annual amount of principal and interest to become due on the
Bonds.
2. Sale. This Council shall meet at the time and
place specified in the notice of sale hereafter prescribed for
the purpose of receiving sealed bids and awarding sale of the
Bonds. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
cause a public notice of the time, place and purpose of the
meeting to be published in the official newspaper of the City,
and in a daily or weekly periodical published in a Minnesota
city of the first class, which circulates throughout the State
and furnishes financial news as a part of its service, once not
less than ten,days before the date of said meeting in
substantially the form of the Notice of Sale attached hereto
and made a part hereof.
3. Terms and Conditions of Sale. The terms and
conditions for the sale and issuance of the Bonds shall be
stated in the Terms and Conditions of Sale attached hereto and
made a part hereof, and such terms and conditions are hereby
authorized to be incorporated in material distributed to
prospective bidders for the Bonds.
4. Official Statement. The City Manager and other
officers of the City, in cooperation with Public Financial
Systems, Inc., financial consultants to the City, is hereby
authorized and directed to prepare on behalf of the City an
official statement to be distributed to potential purchasers of
the Bonds. Such official statement shall contain the statement
of Terms and Conditions of Sale attached hereto and such other
information as shall be deemed advisable and necessary to
adequately describe the City and the security for, and terms
and conditions of, the Bonds.
Attest:
Adopted by the City Council on February 21, 1989.
Mayor
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution
was duly seconded by Member
and upon vote being
taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted,
signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk.
-2-
- Lti
CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO
$5,300,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAXABLE
TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1989
Issuer: City of Edina, Minnesota
Governing body: City Council
Kind, date, time and place of meeting: a regular meeting held
on February 21, 1989 at 7:00 o'clock, p.m., at the City Hall.
Members present:
Members absent:
Documents attached:
Minutes of said meeting (pages): 1 through 2, including
RESOLUTION RELATING TO $5,300,000 GENERAL
OBLIGATION TAXABLE TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES
1989; AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND CALLING FOR
THE PUBLIC SALE THEREOF
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and
acting recording officer of the public corporation issuing the
obligations referred to in the title of this certificate,
certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above,
have been carefully compared with the original records of said
corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been
transcribed; that said documents are a correct and complete
transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of
said corporation, and correct and complete copies of all
resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents
approved by the governing body at said meeting, so far as they
relate to said obligations; and that said meeting was duly held
by the governing body at the time and place and was attended
throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and
notice of such meeting given as required by law.
WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer
and the seal of the City this day of , 1989.
Signature
(SEAL) Marcella M. Daehn, City-Clerk
Name and Title
Member introduced the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION'RELATING TO $5,300,000 GENERAL
OBLIGATION TAXABLE TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES
1989; AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND CALLING FOR
THE PUBLIC SALE THEREOF
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Edina, Minnesota (the City)'; as follows:
1. Authorization. Pursuant to the provisions of
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178 and Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 475, the City Council of the City does authorize the
issuance and sale of its General Obligation Taxable Tax
Increment Bonds, Series 1989 (the Bonds) in the principal
amount of $5,300,000, including every item of cost of the kinds
authorized in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.56, $90,000 of
such amount representing interest as provided in Minnesota
Statutes, Section 475.56, for the purpose of providing funds
for the payment of a portion of the public redevelopment costs
to be paid or incurred by the City and the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the HRA) in
connection with a redevelopment project being undertaken
pursuant to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan of the HRA.
2. Sale. This Council shall meet at the time and
place specified in the notice of sale hereinafter prescribed
for the purpose of receiving sealed bids and awarding sale of
the Bonds. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
cause a public notice of the time, place and purpose of the
meeting to be published in the official newspaper of the City,
and in a daily or weekly periodical, published in a Minnesota
city of the first class, which circulates throughout the state
and furnishes financial news as a part of its service, once not
less than ten days before the date of said meeting in
substantially the form of the Notice of Sale attached hereto
and made a part hereof.
3. Terms and Conditions of Sale. The terms and
conditions for the sale and issuance of the Bonds shall be as
stated in the Terms and Conditions of Sale attached hereto and
made a part hereof, and such terms and conditions are hereby
authorized to be incorporated in material distributed to
prospective bidders for the Bonds.
4. Official Statement. The City Manager and other
officers of the City, in cooperation with Public Financial
Systems, Inc., financial consultants to the City, is hereby
authorized and directed to prepare on behalf of the City an
official statement to be distributed to potential purchasers of
the Bonds. Such official statement shall contain the statement
of Terms and Conditions of Sale attached hereto and such other
information as shall- be deemed advisable and necessary to
adequately describe the City and the security for, and terms
and conditions of, the Bonds.
Attest:
(SEAL)
Adopted by the City Council on February 21, 1989.
Mayor
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing
resolution was duly seconded by Member
and on
vote being taken thereon, the following Council Members voted
in favor:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted and
was signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City
Clerk.
-2-
CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO
$1,760,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS,
SERIES 1989
Issuer: City of Edina, Minnesota
Governing body: City Council
Kind, date, time and place of
held on February 21, 1989,
at the City Hall.
Members present:
Members absent:
meeting: A regular meeting
at 7 :00 o'clock, p.m.,
Documents attached:
Minutes of said meeting (pages): 1 through 2, including
RESOLUTION RELATING TO $1,760,000 GENERAL
OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1989;
AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND PROVIDING FOR THE
PUBLIC SALE THEREOF
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and
acting recording officer of the public corporation issuing the
obligations referred to in the title of this certificate,
certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above,
have been carefully compared with the original records of the
corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been
transcribed; that the documents are a correct and complete
transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of
the corporation, and correct and complete copies of all
resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents
approved by the governing body at the meeting, insofar as they
relate to the obligations; and that the meeting was duly held
by the governing body at the time and place and was attended
throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and
notice of such meeting given as required by law.
WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer
and the seal of the City this day of , 1989.
(SEAL)
Signature
Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk
Name and Title
Member introduced the following resolution
and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION'RELATING TO $1,760,000 GENERAL
OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1989;
AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND PROVIDING FOR THE
PUBLIC SALE THEREOF
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Edina, Minnesota (the City), as follows:
1. Authorization. It is hereby determined that it is
necessary for the City to issue and sell its General Obligation
Improvement Bonds, Series 1989 in the" principal amount of
$1,760,000 (the Bonds) to finance the cost of a public
improvement in the City being undertaken by the City pursuant
to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. $20,000 of the principal
amount of the Bonds represents interest as provided in
Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.56.
2. Sale. The Council shall meet at the time and
place specified in the notice of sale hereinafter prescribed
for the purpose of receiving sealed bids and awarding the sale
of the Bonds. The City,,-Clerk is hereby authorized and directed
to cause a public notice of the time, place and purpose of the
meeting to be published in the official newspaper of the City,
and in a daily or weekly periodical published in a Minnesota
city of the first class, which circulates throughout the state
and furnishes financial news as a part of its service, once not
less than ten days before the date of said meeting in
substantially the form of the Notice of Sale attached hereto
and made a part hereof.
3. Terms and Conditions of Sale. The terms and
conditions for the sale and issuance of the Bonds shall be as
attached hereto and made a part hereof, and such terms and
conditions are hereby authorized to be incorporated in material
distributed to prospective bidders for the Bonds.
4. Official Statement. The City Manager and other
officers of the City, in cooperation with Public Financial
Systems, Inc., financial consultants to the City, are hereby
authorized and directed to prepare on behalf of the City an
official statement to be distributed to potential purchasers of
the Bonds. Such official statement shall contain the statement
of Terms and Conditions of Sale attached hereto and such other
information as shall be deemed advisable and necessary to
describe accurately the City and the security for, and terms
and conditions of, the Bonds.
Attest:
Mayor
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution
was duly seconded by Member and upon vote
being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted,
signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk.
-2-
Ji...... V1�L
CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO
$8,425,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BONDS,
SERIES 1989
Issuer: City of Edina, Minnesota
Governing body: City Council
Kind, date, time and place of meeting: a regular meeting
held on February 21, 1989 at 7:00 o'clock, p.m.,
at the City Hall.
Members present:
Members absent:
Documents attached:
Minutes of said meeting (pages)': 1 through 2, including
RESOLUTION RELATING TO $8,425,000 GENERAL
OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1989;
AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND CALLING FOR THE
PUBLIC SALE THEREOF
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and
acting recording officer of the public corporation issuing the
obligations referred to in the title of this certificate,
certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above,
have been carefully compared with the original records of said
corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been
transcribed; that said documents are a correct and complete
transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of
said corporation, and correct and complete copies of all
resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents
approved by the governing body at said meeting, so far as they
relate to said obligations; and that said meeting was duly held
by the governing body at the time and place and was attended
throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and
notice of such meeting given as required by law..
WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer
and the seal of the City this day of , 1989.
Signature
(SEAL) Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk
Name and Title
Member introduced the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION,RELATING TO $8,425,000 GENERAL
OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1989;
AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND CALLING FOR THE
PUBLIC SALE THEREOF
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Edina, Minnesota (the City), as follows:
1. Authorization.
1.01. Pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota
Statutes, Section 469.178 Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, the
City Council of the City does authorize the issuance and sale
of its General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1989 (the
Bonds) in the principal amount of $8,425,000, including every
item of cost of the kinds authorized in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 475.56, $140,000 of such amount representing interest
as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.56, for the
purpose of providing funds for the payment of a portion of the
public redevelopment costs to be paid or incurred by the City
and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota
(the HRA) in connection with a redevelopment project being
undertaken pursuant to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan
of the HRA.
2. Sale. This Council shall meet at the time and
place specified in the notice of sale hereinafter prescribed
for the purpose of receiving sealed bids and awarding sale of
the Bonds. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
cause a public notice of the time, place and purpose of the
meeting to be published in the official newspaper of the City,
and in a daily or weekly periodical, published in a Minnesota
city of the first class, which circulates throughout the state
and furnishes financial news as a part of its service, once not
less than ten days before the date of said meeting in
substantially the form of the Notice of Sale attached hereto
and made a part hereof.
3. Terms and Conditions of Sale. The terms and
conditions for the sale and issuance of the Bonds shall be as
stated in the Terms and Conditions of Sale attached hereto and
made a part hereof, and such terms and conditions are hereby
authorized to be incorporated in material distributed to
prospective bidders for the Bonds.
4. Official Statement. The City Manager and the
officers of the City, in cooperation with Public Financial
Systems, Inc., financial consultants to the City, is hereby
authorized and directed to prepare on behalf of the City an
official statement to be distributed to potential purchasers of
the Bonds. Such official statement shall contain the statement
of Terms and Conditions of Sale attached hereto and such other
information as shall be deemed advisable and necessary to
adequately describe the City and the security for, and terms
and conditions of, the Bonds.
Attest:
(SEAL)
Adopted by the City Council on February 21, 1989.
Mayor
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing
resolution was duly seconded by Member and on
vote being taken thereon, the following Council Members voted
in favor:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted and
was signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City
Clerk.
-2-
1
DATE: February 21, 1989
T0:
City Council Members and Staff
Edina, Minnesota
IFROM: Public Financial Systems, Inc.
SUBJECT: Pre -Sale Report
I 1989 Bond Issues
Contents
Executive Summary /Recommendations 1
Review of Finance Plans 2
Tax Increment Bonds 2
Improvement Bonds . . . . . . 2
Recreational Facility Bonds . . . 4 -
Market Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Rating . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
IssuingProcess . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Executive Summary /Recommendations
LThis report describes the finance plan for the sale of four bond issues. Two
bond issues cover the second phase of the City's participation in the Centen-
nial Lake Project. These issues are $5,300,000 G.O. Taxable Tax Increment
Bonds and $8,425,000 G.O. Tax Increment. Bonds. The $1,760,000 G.O. Improve-
_ ment Bonds are being sold to finance assessable public improvements for the
Centennial.Lakes Project. The fourth issue is.$2,100,000 in G.O. Recreational
Facility Bonds to finance the construction of a nine -hole golf course and
I related improvements.
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the sale of bonds as
described in this report.
Pre -Sale Report
February 21,, 19W
- Page 2 '
Review of Finance Plans
1 Tax Increment Bonds: The two tax increment bond issues complete the financing
for the City's participation in the Centennial Lakes Project. As with the
bonds sold last October, one issue is tax - exempt and one issue is taxable.
Both issues are general obligations of the City and the full faith, credit and
taxing power of the City is pledged as security. However, debt service on the
Bonds will be paid by tax increment revenues collected by the City from the SE
Edina Redevelopment Area. The components of each bond issue are summarized in
Table 1 below. The combined cash flow analysis for the tax increment project
appears in Appendix A.
Table 1
Components of Tax Increment Bond Issues
$5,300,000 G.O. Taxable Tax
Increment Bonds
Public Improvements
$ 452,986
Housing Site Work
2,969,604
Construction Management
19,998
Contingency
263,059
Total Project Costs
3,705,647
Capitalized Interest
1,484,353
Costs of Issuance
20,000
Discount
90,000
Total Bond Issue
$ 5,300,000
8,425,000 G.O. Tax Increment Bonds
Public Improvements
$1,902,829
Storm Drainage
200,000
Construction Management
60,000
Contingency
590,282
Park
3,800,000
Total Project Costs
6,553,111
Capitalized Interest
1,701,889
t Costs of Issuance
30,000
Discount
_ 140,000
Total Bond Issue
$8,425,000
Improvement Bonds: The $1,760,000 G.O. Improvement Bonds are related to the
Centennial Lakes Projects. The proceeds of this issue will be used to finance
the construction of public improvements for which the costs will be assessed
against benefitted property owners. The issue includes a minimal allocation
for underwriter's discount and costs of issuance to insure proper cash flow.
If additional underwriter compensation is required, some higher initial
interest rates may be the result. Although -the Bonds are general obligations
of the City, debt service will be paid with the special assessments. The com-
ponents of the bond issue are summarized in Table 2. The preliminary debt
service schedule can be found in Table 3. The analysis in Table 3 assumes
that 25% of the $1,715,000 assessable costs will be assessed in 1989.
1
- Pre -Sale Report
.February 21, 1989
Page 3
Table 2
' Components of Improvement Bond Issue
Project Costs $1,585,000
( Capitalized Interest 145,000
I Costs of Issuance 10,000
Discount 20.000
I Total Bond Issue $1,760,000
Table 3
Preliminary Debt Service Schedule Improvement Bonds
..... ASSESSMENTS - ----
428,750 1,286,250
8.75% 8.75%
ANNUAL P & I CAPITALIZED 10 10
DATE PRINCIPAL RATE INTEREST P 8 I 100% INTEREST 1989 1990 BALANCE
.. ........ ............ ....... ............ ............. ............. .............. ...............................
01- Aug -89
38,401.67
O1- Feb -90
01-Apr-89
01- Aug -90
7.291 YRS.
01- Feb -91
01-Apr-89
01- Aug -91
57,602.50
01- Feb -92
180,000
01-Aug -92
0
01- Feb -93
180,000
01- Aug -93
01- Feb -94
180,000
01-Aug -94
01- Feb -95
175,000
01- Aug -95
48,996 80,391
01-Feb -96
175,000
O1- Aug -96
57,602.50
01-Feb -97
175,000
01- Aug -97
01- Feb -98
175,000
01- Aug -98
237,602.50
01- Feb -99
175,000
O1- Aug -99
36,787
01 -Feb -2000
175,000
01- Aug -2000
01- Feb -2001
170,000
1,760,000
BOND YEARS
38,401.67
38,401.67
01-Apr-89
AVG.LIFE
7.291 YRS.
DELIVERY DATE
01-Apr-89
57,602.50
57,602.50
96,004.17
96,004 0
0
0
DISCOWT
57,602.50
57,602.50
57,602.50
57,602.50
115,205.00
48,996 80,391
0
14,181
57,602.50
57,602.50
6.100
57,602.50
237,602.50
295,205.00
76,639
241,172
36,787
52,112.50
52,112.50
6.200
52,112.50
232,112.50
284,225.00
72,888
229,917
55,367
46,532.50
46,532.50
6.300
46,532.50
226,532.50
273,065.00
69,136
218,663
70,101
40,862.50
40,862.50
6.400
40,862.50
215,862.50
256,725.00
65,384
207,408
86,168
35,262.50
35,262.50
6.500
35,262.50
210,262.50
245,525.00
61,633
196,153
98,429
29,575.00
29,575.00
6.600
29,575.00
204,575.00
234,150.00
57,881
184;898
107,058
23,800.00
23,800.00
.
6.700
23,800.00
198,800.00'
222,600.00
54,130
173,644
112,232
17,937.50
17,937.50
6.800
17,937.50
192,937.50
210,875.00
50,378
162,389
114,124
11,987.50
11,987.50
6.900
11,987.50
186,987.50
198,975.00
46,627
151,134
112,910
5,950.00
5,950.00
7.000
5,950.00
...........................................................................
175,950.00
181,900.00
0
139,880
70,890
854,454.17
2,614,454.17
2,614,454.17
145,000 635,086
1,905,258
BOND YEARS
12,831.667
INT. START DAT
01-Apr-89
AVG.LIFE
7.291 YRS.
DELIVERY DATE
01-Apr-89
AVG.COUPON
6.6589 X
ACC. INTEREST
$0.00
M.I.C.
6.8148%
DISCOWT
$20,000.00
U
r
1
Pre -Sale Report
February . 21, 1989
Page 4
Recreational Facility Bonds: The continuation of the City's golf course
improvement plans calls for the issuance of $2,100,000 G.O. Recreational
Facility Bonds. The proceeds of this issue will be used to finance the
construction of an additional nine holes and related improvements at the
Braemar Golf Course. The components of the bond issue are summarized in Table
4.
The Bonds are general obligations of the City, backed by the full faith,
credit and taxing power of the City. Debt service on the Bonds will be paid
by the net revenues of the City's golf course, ice arena and golf dome
recreations. In the event that these revenues are insufficient, revenues from
the municipal liquor store are pledged to repay the debt. The issue is
structured to "wrap" around the existing debt of the golf course, including
the 1988 Bonds. The preliminary debt service schedule can be found in Table
5.
Table 4
Components of Recreational Facility Bond Issue
Nine -Hole Golf Course
Well
Parking Lot
Bufldings
Total Project Cost
Capitalized Interest
Costs of Issuance
Discount
$1,200,000
300,000
300,000
250,000
$2,050,000
0
19,000
31,000
Total Bond Issue $2,100,000
1
Pre -Sale Report
February 21., 1989
Page 5
Table 5
Preliminary Debt Service Schedule Recreational Facility Bonds
ANNUAL P i 1 PLUS: PLUS: TOTAL
DATE PRINCIPAL RATE INTEREST P a 1 100% EXISTING DEBT 1988 BONDS DEBT
.......... .......... ...... .............. ............. ............. ............. ............ .............
01- Jan -90
01- Jul -90
01- Jan -91
01- Jul -91
O1- Jan -92 65,000 6.100
01- Jul -92
01- Jan -93 70,000 6.200
01- Jul -93
01- Jon -94 70,000 6.300
O1- Jul -94
01- Jan -95 75,000 6.400
01- Jul -95
01- Jan -96 80,000 6.500
01- Jul -96
01- Jan -97 85,000 6.600
01- Jul -97
01- Jan-98 95,000 6.700
O1- Jul -98
01- Jan -99 100,000 6.800
01- Jul -99
01 -Jan -2000 105,000 6.900
01- Jul -2000
01 -Jan -2001 115,000 7.000
01- Jul -2001
01- Jan -2002 120,000 7.050
01- Jul -2002
O1- Jan -2003 130,000 7.100
01- Jul -2003
01- Jan -2004 140,000 7.150
01 -Jul -2004
01- Jan -2005 145,000 7.200
01- Jul -2005
01- Jan -2006 160,000 7.250
01 -Jul -2006
01- Jan -2007 170,000 7.250
01- Jul -2007
01- Jan -2008 180,000 7.300
01- Jul -2008
01- Jan -2009 195,000 7.300
01 -Jul -2009
saaa_aaessaaa
2,100,000
109,668.75
109,668.75-
INT. START DATE
01- Apr -89
AVG.LIFE -
12.99 YRS.
73,112.50
73,112.50
162,781.25
140,500
176,225
499,506.25
73,112.50
73,112.50
DISCOUNT
$31,000.00
eaaaaassaaeaesaaaa
aasaaasassaaascscasaaaasaxaxaaaxaesaaaaeaaa
73,112.50
73,112.50
146,225.00
137,187
176,225
459,637.00
73,112.50
138,112.50
71,130.00
71,130.00
209,242.50
133,725
200,463
543,430.00
71,130.00
141,130.00
68,960.00
68,960.00
210,090.00
130,125
198,925
539,140.00
68,960.00
138,960.00
66,755.00
66,755.00
205,715.00
174,500
197,363
577,577.50
66,755.00
141,755.00
64,355.00
64,355.00
206,110.00
166,800
195,775
568,685.00
64,355.00
144,355.00
61,755.00
61,755.00
206,110.00
158,900
194,163
559,172.50
61,755.00
146,755.00
58,950.00
58,950.00
205,705.00
150,850
192,525
549,080.00
58,950.00
153,950.00
55,767.50
55,767.50
209,717.50
142,675
190,863
543,255.00
55,767.50
155,767.50
52,367.50
52,367.50
208,135.00
182,250
189,175
579,560.00
52,367.50
157,367.50
48,745.00
48,745.00
206,112.50
169,500
187,463
563,075.00
48,745.00
163,745.00
44,720.00
44,720.00
208,465.00
156,525
330,475
695,465.00
44,720.00
164,720.00
40,490.00
40,490.00
205,210.00
0
342,300
547,510.00
40,490.00
170,490.00
35,875.00
35,875.00
206,365.00
0
328,150
534,515.00
35,875.00
175,875.00
30,870.00
30,870.00
206,745.00
0
338,006
544,751.25
30,870.00
175,870.00
-
25,650.00.
25,650.00
201,520.00
0
345,963
547,482.50
25,650.00
185,650.00
19,850.00
19,850.00
205,500.00
0
347,175
552,675.00
19,850.00
189,850.00
13,687.50
13,687.50
203,537.50
0
332,419
535,956.25
13,687.50
193,687450
7,117.50
7,117.50
200,805.00
0
360,588
561,392.50
7,117.50
202,117.50
0.00
0.00
202,117.50
0
336,863
538,980.00
aaeaaa- aaaaaasa
1,936,208.75
exaaarsaaaasa
4,036,208.75
axaaxaaasszaa
4,036,208.75
aasaxaxxaaaxa srzxasaaaaa
1,843,537 5,161,100
xar- eaxaaaxa*
11,040,845.75
BOND TEARS -
27,280.00
INT. START DATE
01- Apr -89
AVG.LIFE -
12.99 YRS.
DELIVERY DATE
01-Apr -89
AVG.000PON -
7.10%
ACCRUED INTERES
$0.00
N.I.C. -
7.21 X
DISCOUNT
$31,000.00
eaaaaassaaeaesaaaa
aasaaasassaaascscasaaaasaxaxaaaxaesaaaaeaaa
FOOTNOTES
(1) Caaponents
of Bond Issue
- Pre -Sale Report
February 21, 1989
Page 6
Market Conditions
1 1988 was an interesting year to follow interest rates on tax - exempt bonds.
The Bond Buyer's Index (BBI) was remarkably stable for the year. The BBI is
the traditional market indicator for tax - exempt interest rates. The Index is
an average of interest rates for 20 year municipal bonds of 20 communities
whose average credit rating is "Al". The average BBI for 1988 was very
_ similar to the previous year, 7.68 in 1988 and 7.66 in 1987. However, during
1988, the. BBI moved in a very narrow range from a high of 7.97 to a low of
7.33. In comparison, the high for 1987 was 9.17 and the low was 6.54.
The BBI has been in decline since early December. Over the past few weeks the
BBI has dropped from 7.68 to the current level of 7.27. This marks the
lowest level for the BBI since the first quarter of 1987. By way of com-
parison, the BBI was at 7.53 for the City's bond sale in October. There is
reason to expect that interest rates will remain favorable in the coming
weeks. With the exception of 1984, the BBI has dropped or remained stable
during the first ten weeks of every year since 1983. The graph below il-
lustrates the trends in the BBI since 1982..
TREND OR BOND BUYERS INDEX
14
13
12
L
,1
x
10
L
m
s
8
7
6
5
Bend Buyers Index 1966 -69
1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989
i
Pre -Sale Report
February 21, 1989
Page 7
Rating
The rating review process last Fall laid the foundation for these issues. The
tax increment issues were included in the cash flow analysis for the Centen-
nial Lakes Project. The debt service for the golf course and ice arena
improvements includes payments for bonds to be issued in 1989. The rating
agencies were aware of the these financings and their implications. The
proposed improvement bonds are relatively small. They are also completely
supported by special assessments. These factors suggest that the rating
review for the upcoming issues will be straight- forward.
As noted for the previous bond issues, the rating analysis will focus on the
financial feasibility of the Centennial Lakes Project and the overall indeb-
tedness of the City. We will work with the City Staff to insure that the
rating analysts are properly updated on the status of the Project and the
construction timetable. The matter of debt burden should not be a significant
factor. The new debt, with the exception of the improvement bonds, should
have been factored into their previous analysis.
Issuing Process
The proposed timetable for the issuance of these bonds is as follows:
February 21
Council action to initiate sale process.
Week of
February 21 -
Official Statement preparation.
Notice of Sale distribution.
Rating information distribution.
Week of
March 6 -
Official Statement printed /distributed.
Rating issues resolved.
Week of
March 13 -
Market development
Rating released.
March 20
Bond sale.
Week of
April 10
Closing (estimated).
We have enjoyed serving as your financial advisor and look forward to making
these bond issues successful.
Respectfully submitted,
PUBLIC FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Pre -Sale Report
February 21,,1989
Page 8
r
r
APPENDIX A
1 CASH FLOW ANALYSIS
TAX INCREMENT BONDS
I
I
l_
CENTENNIAL LAKES CASH FLOW ANALYSIS - G.O. TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1989
(3) TOTAL BUDGET-FOR CITY PARTICIPATION
......•• TOTAL ....... ••• -- BONDS
10/88 - - - --
...... BONDS
3/89 ......
• mamaa•�mama mnamamnmam aaaanaaamm
TAXABLE TAX - EXEMPT TAXABLE
amammaaamm
TAX- EXEMPT
ammmanamsa
TAXABLE
amaasaasa■
mas= asm =as msasa =a =sn nssea = ==sa
LAND 1,553,523 6,415,157 1,553,523
m= ma =sa =xs
6,415,157
TAX- EXEMPT
PARK FEE %5,158' 1,007,888 %5,158
1,007,888
0
0
0
0
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS 452,986 1,902,829
452,986
1,902,829
LAND WRITEDOWN (RETAIL)- 800,000 800,000
0
0
STORM DRAINAGE 200,000
0
200,000
PARK . 3,800,000
HOUSING SITE WORK 2,969,604
0
3,800,000
2,969,604
0
SUBTOTAL 6,741,271 13,325,874
ADMINISTRATION 231,000 469,000 231,000
469,000
0
0
0
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 19,998 60,000
19,998
60,000
CONTINGENCY 263,059 590,282
--- - -- - --- ---- ------ ----------
263,059
590,282
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS 7,255,328 14,445,156 3,549,681
---- - -- - --
7,892,045
-- -- - ----
3,705,647
6,553,111
DISCOUNT 197,000 350,000 95,000
COSTS OF ISSUANCE 25,000 40,000 30,000
190,000
40,000
90,000
140,000 /r
CAPITALIZED INTEREST 2,922,672 3,764,844 1,425,319
.......... .......... ..........
2,052,955
...
20,000
1,484,353
30,000
1,701,889
TOTAL BOND ISSUE 10,400,000 18,600,000 5,100,000
. ......
10,175,000
. ... .. . . ..
5,300,000
8,425,000
aaaassssas asamasssaa ansaaassam
saasaas ==a
mm:asaaasa
axsseaas =a
(4) NOTES
' Cumulative Balance: Beginning amount ■ Fund balance 12/31/87.
' $10,322,855 Centennial Lakes Project Cost includes
net land acquisition, park fee and retail write -down.
' Other Centennial Lakes expenses for 1988 a $351,699.68
' Other Edinborough expenses for 1988 a 5678,353.84.,
' Actual 1988 tax increment revenue a 51,662,602
' Actual costs of issuance ■ $40,211.80.
PREPARED BY Public Financial Systems, Inc. (JRF) DATE: 06- Feb -89. PAGE 2
j .- - -- �� �...,„ ' w•�aaw ror�wm raoora.ro NNNIIWiall ��
CENTENNIAIRS CASH FLOW ANALYSIS - G.O. TAX 1
MCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1989
� ....................... 41VEMAS .......................�
..........................................
PROJECT
EXPENSES ............
..............................'
DATE
TAX BOND
INCREMENT
INVESTMENT
INCOME
TOTAL
OTHER
COSTS
CENTENNIAL
PROJECT
COSTS
EDINBORUGH
DEBT
1988
7988
1989
...--..PROCEEDS REVENUES LAKES
OTHER
SERVICE
TAX-EXEMPT
TAXABLE
TAX - EXEMPT
1989
TAXABLE
TOTAL
EXPENSES
PERIOD CUM.
BALANCE
INVEST.
....................
...............................
WIMCE
RATE
DATE
Jan•88
0
0
0
0..............
0
0
...............
...............................
2,743,906
Mar -88
0
0
135,775
0
0
0
O
513,683
(513,683) 2,230,275
5.S00
Jan 88
Apr -88
0
0
0
0
135,775
(135,775) 2,094,448
5.500
Feb-88
Hay-88
0
0
141 750
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 2,094,448
5.500
wr•88
0
0
0
0
0
141,750
(141,750) 1,952,698
5.500
Apr -88
Jut-88
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 1,952,698
5.500
May-88
Aug -88
0
0
$73,863
0
0
0
0
0
0 1,952,698
5.500
Jvr88
Sep-88
0
135,775
0
0
0
0
513,863
(513,863) 1,438,836
5.500..
Jul -88
Oct-88
15,275,000
0
0
15,275,000
10,322,855
213,900
0
0
0
0
0
135,775
0
(135,775) 1,303,061
0 1,303,061
5.500
Aug•88
0
0
591,750
0
0
11,158,505
5.500
Ott
1)
Dee •88
1,662,602
0
1,662,602
0
0
0
0
0
4,11l,495 5,419,556
5.500
as
jam-89
Feb -89
. 26,289
26,289
357,700
343,704
678,351
14,167
663,863
0
0
0
0
1,030,054
0 5,419,556
632,548 6,052,104
5.500
5.500
Nov-88
Dec -88
Mar-89
13,725,000
25,458
21,954
25,458
73,746,954
343 734
79,167
135,775
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7,021,764
(995,175) 5,056,629
5.500
Jan 89
Apr-89
50,774
50,774
343,734
294,167
0
0
0
0
0
558,676
(533,218) 4,523,411
5.500
Feb-89
McY.89
79•�
79,838
343,734
14,167
119,250
p
0
0
0
637,901
477,751
13,109,053 17,632,164
5.500
Mar-89
Jun-89
78,221
343,734
71,767
0
0
0
0
0
(426,377) 17,206,087
5.500
Apr-89.
Jul•89
A%•8
1,063,784
76,946
.78,224
1,140,730
343,754
343,734
14,167
14,167
0
Spg,g80
0
0
0
0
357,901
357,901
(278,063) 16,928,024
(279,677) 16,648,347
5.500
5.500
May -89
Jun•89
76,932
72.9%
76,932
72,996
343,734
343,734
14,167
785,775
6p5�gw,
0
406.8103
0
300.969
0
211,171
866.889
2,068,713
275,842 16,922,189
(1,991,781)
5.500
Jul -89
Oct -89
NOW-89
67,778
67,778
343,734
14167
14,167
0
$69,250
0
0
0
357,901
14,930,408
(284,905) 14,645,503
5.500
5.500
Aug -89
Dec 89
1,067,784
65,156
60,277
201,300 266,456
1,521,641
14,167
0
0
0
0
927,751
(859,373) 13,786,130
5.500
Oct.89
Jan-90
59,124
1,124,061
343,734
14,167
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,535,808
(1,269,352) 12,516,778
5.500
Nw -89
58,685
59,724
343,734
14,167
658,988
0
0
357,901
766,160 13,262,938
5.500
Dec -89
Aar-Feb-90
990
52,833
58,685
52,833
343,734
343,734
14,167
14,167
134,47S
363,506
2",088
300,969
253,694
1,654,633
(1`5957,948) 10,729,226
5.500
Feb•90
may -90
48'477
"•
48.477
343,734
14,767
96,300
0
0
0
0
0.
357,901
(305,068) 10,424,158
5.500
Mar-90
Jun -90
<5,205
46,848
343,734
14,767
0
0
0
0
0
454,201
(405,724) 10,028,434
5.500
Apr-90
Jul -90
Aug -90
1,092,671
43,776
45,205
1,136,450
343,734
343,734
14,167
14,167
0
0
0
0
0
0
357,901
357,901
(311,053) 9,707,381
(312,696) 9,394,685
5.500
5.500
wy -90
Jun•90
43,688
40,511
43,688
40,511
343,734
14,167
503,925
184,475
363,506
2",088
300,969
253,694
1,704,633
Oct-9%
35,978
343,734
14,167
0
0
0
0
(1,660,945) 8,008,364
5.500
Aug -90
Nw•90
33,261
35,978
343 734
1C 167
546,300
p
0
0
0
357,901
(317,390) 7,690,971
S.S00
Sep 90
Dec 90
1,092,674
27,828
33,261
1,521,642
14,167
0
0
0
0
0
904,201
(868,223) 6,822,751
5.500
Oet•90
Jan-91
26 732
1,120,261
343,752
14,167
0
0
0
0
0
1,535,809
(1,502,548) 5,320,203
5.500
NOW-90
Feb 91
26,408
26 732
14,167
653,925
0
0
0
0
357.901
762,601 6,082,804
5.500
Dee•90
wr•91
Apr-91
21,997
26,408
21,997
14,167
14,167
133,1250
363,506
2 ",088
300, %9
0
253,694
668,092
1,309,549
(641,960) 5,"0,844
(1,283,141) 4,157,703
5.500
5.500
jam-91
Fab-91
Nay -91
19,074
78,936
19,071
14,767
72,900
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14,167
7,830 4,165,533
5.500
wr•91
Jun-91
78,791
18,936
14,167
0
0
0
0
0
8 067
(67,993) 4,097,540
5.500
Jut-91
1,256,780
18,813
18,791
1,277,593
14,167
0
0
0
0
0
0
14,167
12,767
4,769 4,102,309
4,624
5.500
� -91
Aug -91
Sep -91
20,576
20,576
14,167
14 ,167
4 %,600
183,725
0
363,506
0
0
0
$12,767
4,106,933 .
764,826 4,871,759
5.500
S.S00
Jut-91
Jul -91
Oct -91
19.260
16,204
19,260
14,167
0
0
2 ",088
0
300, %9
253,694
1,359,549
(1,338,973) 3,532,786
5.500
Aug-91
Nov-91
15.022
16,204
14,167
522'900
0
0
0
14 ,167
5,093 3,537,879
5.500
Oct-91
15,022
0
0
0
537,067
(520,863) 301 016
5.500
0
0
14,167
855 3,017,871
5.500
Nov-91
PREPARED BY
Public Ftnenetal Syata
. Inc. (JRF)
DATE: 06 -Feb -W
PAGE 3
I i � _ i i r� -�•� . ��..�� �..r�w wrrw.r .uuresrr o•ooe s�.A �^ � q
CENTENNIAL L+ "SH FLOW ANALYSIS - G.O. TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1989
PREPARED BY Public Flnw elal $"tow, Inc. (JRF) DATE: 06- Feb -89 PAGE 4
� ....................... REVENUES .......................
'.....-T........... ....................... EXPENSES
PROJECT
DATE
TAX
INCREMENT
BON D . INVESTMENT
PROCEEDS INCOME
TOTAL
OTHER REVENUES
COSTS
CENTENNIAL
PROJECT
COSTS
EDINBORUGN
DEBT
1988
1988
1989
1984
TOTAL
PERIOD
CUM.
INVEST.
••
LAKES
................................................................................................................................
OTHER
SERVICE
TAX - EXEMPT
TAXABLE
TAX - EXEMPT
TAXABLE
EXPENSES
BALANCE
...............................
BALANCE
RATE
DATE
Dee -91
1,258,780
13,830
1,272,610
14,167
0
0
.....
.
.. . . . . . . .
...
. • . .
. - .......
0
0
0
14,167
1,258,413
4,276,3904
5.500
Om-91
Feb-92
Aug -92
1,871,045
0
0
0
1,871,045
28,334
85,002
780,325
773,900
.
363,506
363,506
.:....
244,088
244,088
300,969
253,694
1,970,916
(1,970,916)
2,305,398
0.000
Feb-92
92
Feb-93
1,871,045
0
256,300 2,127,345
85,002
1,321,000
363,506
2",088
300,969
300,969
253,694
253,694
2,021,159
2,568,259
(150,114)
2,155,284
0.000
Aug-92
Aug -93
Feb -94
2,419,072
2,419,072
0
0
2,419,072
85,002
739,100
363,506
244,088
300,969
253,694
1,986,359
(440,914)
432,713
1,714,369
2,147,083
0.000
0.000
Feb-93
Aug -93
Aug-94
2,536,829
0
2,419,072
2,536,829
85,002
85,002
1,286,100
703,550
363,506
363,506
2",088
300,969
253,694
2,533,359
(114,287)
2,032,796
0.000-
Feb-94
Feb -95
2,536,829
0
2,536,829
85,002
1,000,450
613,506
2",088
369,088
300, 969
525,969
253,694
378,694
1,950,809
2,972,709
586,020
2,618,816
0.000
Aug =94
Aug -95.
feb -96
2,595,180
2,595,180
0
2,595,180
85,002
734,450
355,506
238,338
293,769
247,944
1,955,009
(435,880)
640,171
2,182,937
2,823,108
0.000
0.000
Feb-95
Aug -95
Aug•96
2,654,698
0
0
2,595,180
2,654,698
85,002
85,002
1,479,650
693,200
430,506
353,069
288,338
236,025
368,769
297,944
2,950,209
(355,029)
2,468,079
0.000
-Feb -96
Feb -97
Aug -97
2,654,698
2,715,406
0
2,654,698
85,002
1,438,250
528,069
336,025
291,331
416,331
245,631
320,631
1,904,258
3,124,308
750,"0
(469,610)
3,218,519
2,748,908
0.000
0.000
Aug -96
Feb-97
Feb -98
2,715,406
0
0
2,715,406
2,715,406
85,002
85,002
651,125
1,3 96,100
347,294
597,294
231,375
356,375
287,206
487,206
242,144
1,844,146
871,260
3,620,168
0.000
Aug -97
Aug -98
Feb 99
2,777,328
2,777,328
0
2,777,328
85,002
658,300
338,919
225,531
280,506
367,146
236,300
3,289,121
1,824,558
(573,715)
952,770
3,046,453
3,999,224
0.000
0.000
Feb-98
Aug -98
Aug -99
2,840,489
0
0
2,777,328
2,840,489
85,002
85,002
1,351,550
612,850
663,919
327,869
375,531
218,519
555,506
411,300
3,442,808
(665,480)
3,333,7"
0.000
Feb-99
Feb -2000
2.840.489
0
2,840,489
85,002
1,306,050
752,869
"3,519
271,156
621,156
228,119
453,119
1,743,515
1,096,974
4,430,718
0.000
Aug -99
Aug -2000
Feb -2001
2•840•489
2,840,489
0
2,840,489
85,002
566,900
313,206
207,944
259,081
217,5"
3,661,715
1,649,677
(821,226)
1,190,812
3,609,492
4,800,304
0.000
0.000
Feb -2000
Aug -2000
Aug -2001
2,840,489
0
0
2,840,489
2,840,489
85,002
85,002
1, 360 ,000
566,000
788,206
296,581
432,944
634,081
467,5"
3,767,777
(927,288)
3,873,016
0.000
Feb -2001
Feb -2002
2,840,489
0
2,840,489
85,002
1,307,250
821,581
197,369
"7,369
245,956
695,956
205,794
480,794
1,5 96,702
1,243,787
5,116,803
0.000
Aug -2001
Au0.2002
Feb 2003
2,840,489
2,840,489
0
2,840,489
85,002
512,750
278,075
185,556
230,094
192,800
3,837,952
1,484,277
(997,463)
1,356,212
4,119,340
5,475,552
0.000
0.000
Feb -2002
Aug -2002
Aug•2003
2,840,489
0
0
2,840,489
2,840,489
85,002
85,002
1,254,000
459,500
903,075
255,888
485,556
171,381
730,094
212,3"
517,800
3,975,527
(1,135,038)
4,340,514
0.000
Fab -2003
Feb-2004
Aug -2004
2,840,489
2,840,489
0
2,840,489
85,002
1,200,750
955,888
521,381
787,3"
177,4"
552,4"
1,361,559
4,102,809
1,478,930
(1,262,320)
5,819,4"
4,557,124
0.000
0.000
Aug -2003
Fab -2004
Feb -2005
2,840,489
0
0
2,840,489
2,840,489
85,002
85,002
705,750
1,186,500
230,863
154,756
191,788
159,631
1,527,790
1,312,699
5,869,823
0.000
Aug -2004
Aug -2005
2,840,489
0
2,840,489
85,002
689,250
980,863
203,863
529,756
136,850
791,788
534,631
4,108,X0
(1,268,051)
4,601,772
0.000
Feb-2005
Feb-2006
Aug•2006
2,840,489
2,840,489
0
2,840,489
85,002
1,118,250
1,028,863
586,850
170,188
870,188
141,725
X1,725
1,426,878
4,230,878
1,413,611
(1,390,389)
6,015,382
4,624,993
0.000
0.000
Aug -2005
Feb -2006
Feb -2007
2,840,489
0
0
2,840,489
2,840,489
85,002
85,002
621,000
173,956
1,498,956
115,250
1 ",813
122,525
1,262,546
1,577,943
6,202,936
0.000
Aug -2006
Aug -2007
2,860,489
0
2,840,489
41,555
125,925
765,250
83,888
1,2 ",813
104,938
822,525
4,416,546
(1,576.057)
4,626,879
0.000
Feb -2007
Feb -2008
Aug•2008
2,840,689
2,840,489
1,775,925
908,888
1 479 938
88,750
963,750
"5,056
5,128.501
2,395,433
(2,288,012)
7,022,312
4,734,300
0.000
0.000
Aug -2007
Feb -2008
Feb -2009
2,840,489
0
2,840,489
2,840,4809
65,700
43,875
X,750
46,313
210,638
2,629,851
7,364,151
0.000
Aug -2008
Aug 2009
0
0
1,865,700
943,875
•
1,554,750
996 313
•
5,360,638
Q,520 149)
•
4,8",002
0.000
Feb -2009
Feb -2010
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4,8",002
0.000
Aug -2009
-- ..1,473,879 ••..457,600
_ -- .-
0
0
0
0
0
0
4,8",002
0.000
Fab -2010
100, "1,975
aOrYYiNr
29,000,000
131,373,4X
21,279,986
4,397,215.
36,878,383
....
.22,112. .-
,838
-- -.-.095
13,085,Q95
-- -- .-,468
18,112,468
. ..---,373 1--.-- -,358
13,407,373 129,273,358
...........
2,100,096
r�Wrrrraat�rrrrarraaaar��lYatOrrargr/
Yrra�ararprrptrr�r��rNarYY�00rritlrrrrrY
��
PREPARED BY Public Flnw elal $"tow, Inc. (JRF) DATE: 06- Feb -89 PAGE 4
-- �- j ��r I �.�w �sr� r-�ra• r.r wMe�aw YtlB�IIYO ®i�q _4 I �� � loaf
CENTENNIAL LAKES CASH FLOW ANALYSIS - G.O. TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1989
I..........
1988 TAX - EXEMPT
...........
1988 TAXABLE
10,175,000
5,100,000
ANNUAL
PRINCIPAL
RATE
INTEREST
PRINCIPAL
DEBT
DATE PAYMENTS
.....................................
(X)
PAYMENTS
.... ...............
3 INTEREST
..
SERVICE
.... ......
Jan -88
6.400
0
0
SERVICE
Feb -88
6.400
0
0
0
Mar -88
6.400
0
0
0
Apr -88
6.400
0
0
9.200
May -88
6.400
0
0
Jun-88
6.400
0
0
May -88
Jul -88
6.400
0
0
Aug -88
6.400
0
0
0
Sep -88
6.400
0
0
0
Oct -88
6.400
0
0
9.200
Nov -88
6.400
0
0
Dec -88
6.400
0
0
0
Jan -89
6.400
0
0
Feb -89
6.400
0
0
0
Mar -89
6.400
0
0
0
Apr -89
6.400
0
0
9.200
14ay -89
6.400
0
0
Jun -89
6.400
0
0
Mar -89
Jul-89
6.400
0
0
Aug-89
6.400
605,844
605,844
0
Sep-89
6.400
0
0
0
0ct -89
6.400
0
0
9.200
Nov. 89
6.400
0
0
Dec -89
6.400
0
0
6050844
Jan -90
6.400
0
0
Feb -90
6.400
363,506
363,506
0
Mar -90
6.400
0
0
0
Apr -90
6.400
0
0
9.200
May -90
6.400
0
0
Jun -90
6.400
0
0
Jaw90
JuL -90
6.400
0
0
Aug -90
6.400
363,506
363,506
244,088
Sep -90
6.400
0
0
0
Oct -90
6.400
0
0
9.200
Nov -90
6.400
0
0
Dec -90
6.400
0
0
727,012
Jan -91
6.400
0
0
Feb -91
6.400
363,506
363,506
0
Mar-91
6.400
0
0
244,088
Apr -91
6.400
0
0
9.200
May -91
6.400
0
0
Jun-91
6.400
0
0
Nov -90
JuL -91
6.400
0
0
Aug -91
6.400
363,506
363,506
0
Sep-91
6.400
0
0
0
Oct-91
6.400
0
0
9.200
Nov -91
6.400
0
0
PREPARED BY Public Finencial System, Inc. (JRF) DATE: 06-Feb -89
PAGE 5
�••........
1988 TAXABLE
...........
5,100,000
ANNUAL
PRINCIPAL
RATE
INTEREST
PRINCIPAL
DEBT
DATE
..................................
PAYMENTS
(X)
PAYMENTS
...............................
8 INTEREST
SERVICE
Jan -88
9.200
0
0
Feb -88
9.200
0
0
Mar -88
9.200
0
0
Apr -88
9.200
0
0
May -88
9.200
0
0
Jun -88
9.200
0
0
Jul -88
9.200
0
0
Aug -88
9.200
0
0
Sep -88
9.200
0
0
Oct -88
9.200
0
0
Nov -88
9.200
0
0
Dec -88
9.200
0
0
0
Jan -89
9.200
0
0
Feb -89
9.200
0
0
Mar -89
9.200
0
0
Apr -89
9.200
0
0
May -89
9.200
0
0
Jun -89
9.200
0
0
Jul -89
9.200
0
0
Aug -89
9.200
406,813
406,813
Sep -89
9.200
0
0
Oct-89
9.200
0
0
Nov -89
9.200
0
0
Dec-89
9.200
0
0
406,813
Jaw90
9.200
0
0
Feb -90
9.200
244,088
244,088
Mar -90
9.200
0
0
Apr -90
9.200
0
0
May -90
9.200
0
0
Jun -90
9.200
0
0
JUL -90
9.200
0
0
Aug -90
9.200
244,088
244,088
Sep -90
9.200
0
0
Oct -90
9.200
0
0
Nov -90
9.200
0
0
Dec -90
9.200
0
0
488,176
Jan -91
9.200
0
0
Feb -91
9.200
244,088
244,088
Mar -91
9.200
0
0
Apr -91
9.200
0
0
May -91
9.200
0
0
Jun -91
9.200
0
0
Jul -91
9.200
0
0
Aug -91
9.200
244,088
244,088
Sep -91
9.200
0
0
Oct -91
9.200
0
0
Nov -91
9.200
0
0
PAGE 5
t I '
CENTENNIAL LAKES CASH FLOW ANALYSIS - C.O. TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1989
I.......... 1988 TAX-EXEMPT ...........I
............ ....................................
10,175,000 11,937,838 22,112,838 21,749,332
assaasaaasaa asaaaaaaaaaassasasa seasasasaaaaaaasa
I I ®v
�.......... .1988 TAXABLE ...........
5,100,000 ANNUAL
PRINCIPAL RATE INTEREST PRINCIPAL DEBT
DATE PAYMENTS (X) PAYMENTS 8 INTEREST SERVICE
.................................. ........................... ....
Dee -91
.. .. .............................
10,175,000
9.200
0
O
ANNUAL
Feb -92
PRINCIPAL
RATE
INTEREST
PRINCIPAL
DEBT
DATE
.....................................•----......................----
PAYMENTS
(X)
PAYMENTS
8 INTEREST
SERVICE
Dec-91
-- - - -
- - - - - -
6.400
- - -
0
0
Feb-92
-
0
- -
6.400
- - - - -
363,506
- - - - - -
363,506
- - - - - -
727,012
Aug -92
6.400
363,506
363,506.
488,176
Feb -93
6.400
363,506
363,506
727,012
Aug -93
125,000
6.400
363,506
363,506
613,176
Feb -94
6.400
363,506
363,506,
727,012
Aug -94
50,000
6.400
363,506
363,506
526,676
Feb- 95
250,000
6.400
363,506
613,506
977,012
Aug -95
100,000
6.400
355,506
355,506
572,050
Feb -96
75,000
6.500
355,506
430,506
786,012
Aug -96
125,000
6.500
353,069
353,069
587,750
Feb -97
175,000
6.600
353,069
528,069
881,138
Aug -97
150,000
6.600
347,294
347,294
601,062
Feb -98
250,000
6.700
347,294
597,294
944,588
Aug -98
225,000
6.700
338,919
338,919'
662,038
Feb -99
325,000
6.800
338,919
663,919
1,002,838
Aug -99
225,000
6.800
327,869
327,869
640,888
Feb-2000
425,000
6.900
327,869
752,869
1,080,738
Aug -2000
250,000
6.900
313,206
313,206
644,738
Feb -2001
475,000
7.000
313,206
788,206
1;101,412
Aug -2001
300,000
7.000
296,581
296,581
671,112
Feb -2002
525,000
7.050
296,581
821,581
1,118,162
Aug -2002
350,000
7.050
278,075
278,075
692,762
Feb - 2003
625,000
7.100
278,075
903,075
1,181,150
Aug -2003
375,000
7.100 -
255,888
255,888
684,512
Feb - 2004
700,000
7.150
255,888
955,888
1,211,776
Aug -2004
450,000
7.150
230,863
230,863
723,700
Feb -2005
750,000
7.200
230,863
980,863
1,211,726
Aug -2005
650,000
7.200
203,863
203,863
880,500
Feb - 2006
825,000
7.250
203,863
1,028,863
1,232,726
Aug -2006
825,000
7.250
173,956
173,956
992,776
Feb -2007
1,325,000
7.250
173,956
1,498,956
1,672,912
Aug -2007
900,000
7.250
125,925
125,925
987,750
Feo -2008
1,650,000
7.300
125,925
1,775,925
1,901,850
Aug-2008
7.300
65,700
65,700
Feb -2009
1,800,000
7.300
65,700
1,865,700
1,931,400
............ ....................................
10,175,000 11,937,838 22,112,838 21,749,332
assaasaaasaa asaaaaaaaaaassasasa seasasasaaaaaaasa
I I ®v
�.......... .1988 TAXABLE ...........
5,100,000 ANNUAL
PRINCIPAL RATE INTEREST PRINCIPAL DEBT
DATE PAYMENTS (X) PAYMENTS 8 INTEREST SERVICE
.................................. ........................... ....
Dee -91
.. .. .............................
9.200
0
O
Feb -92
9.200
244,088
244,088
488,176
Aug -92
9.200
244,088
244,088
Feb -93
9.200
244,088
244,088
488,176
Aug-93
9.200
244,088
244,088
Feb -94
9.200
244,088
244,088
488,176
Aug -94
9.200
244,088
244,088
Feb -95
125,000
9.200
244,088
369,088
613,176
Aug-95
9.200
238,338
238,338
Feb -96
50,000
9.250
236,338
288,338
526,676
Aug -96
9.250
236,025
236,025
Feb -97
100,000
9.300
236,025
336,025
572,050
Aug -97
9.300
231,375
231,375
Feb -98
125,000
9.350
231,375
356,375
587,750
Aug-98
9.350
225,531
225,531
Feb -99
150,000
9.350
225,531
375,531
601,062
Aug-99
9.350
218,519
218,519
Feb-2000
225,000
9.400
218,519
443,519
662,038
Aug -2000
9.400
207,944
207,944
Feb - 2001
225,000
9.400
207,944
432,944
640,888
Aug -2001
9.400
197,369
197,369
Feb- 2002
250,000
9.450
197,369
447,369
644,738
Aug -2002
9.450
185,556
185,556
Feb -2003
300,000
9.450
185,556
485,556
671,112
Aug -2003
9.450,
171,381
171,381
Feb -2004
350,000
9.500
171,381
521,381
692,762
Aug -2004
9.500
154,756
154,756
Feb -2005
375,000
9.550
154,756
529,756
684,512
Aug -2005
9.550
136,850
136,850
Feb -2006
450,000
9.600
136,850
586,850
723,700
AU9.2006
9.600
115,250
115,250
Feb -2007
650,000
9.650
115,250
765,250
880,500
Aug -2007
9.650
83,8 88
83,888
Feb- 2008
825,000
9.700
83,888
908,888
992,776
Aug -2008
9.700
43,875
43,875
Feb - 2009
900,000
9.750
43,875
943,875
987,750
............ ..... ..... ........... ...............
5,100,000 7,985,095 13,085,095 12,841,007
saaaaaassaaa aasaasasaasataaaasaa
0
PREPARED BY Public Ffrwwfal System, Inc. (JRF) DATE: 06- Feb-89 PAGE 6
CENTENNIAL LAKES CASH FLOW ANALYSIS - G.O. TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1989
..� 11"M wmw� aa"
�...•......
1989 TAX - EXEMPT ...........
...........
8,425,000
5,300,000
ANNUAL
ANNUAL
PRINCIPAL
RATE
INTEREST
PRINCIPAL
DEBT
DATE
..................................
PAYMENTS
(X)
PAYMENTS
.... ...........................
3 INTEREST
SERVICE
Jan-88
Jan-88
6.400
0
0
0
Feb-88
Feb-88
6.400
0
0
0
Mar -88
Mar -88
6.400
0
0
0
Apr -88
Apr -88
6.400
0
0
0
May-88
May-88
6.400
0
0
0
Jun -88
Jun-88
6.400
0
0
0
Jul -88
Jul -88
6.400
0
0
0
Aug -88
Aug -88
6.400
0
0
0
Sep-88
Sep -88
6.400
0
0
0
Oct-88
Oct-88
6.400
0
0
0
NOV-88
Nov-88
6.400
0
0
0
Dec -88
Dec-88
6.400
0
0
0
Jan -89
Jan -89
6.400
0
0
0
Feb -89
Feb -89
6.400
0
0
0
Mar -89
Mar -89
.6.400
0
0
0
Apr -89
Apr -89
6.400
0
0
0
May -89
May -89
6.400
0
0
0
Jun -89
Jun -89
6.400
0
0
0
JUL -89
Jul -89
6.400
0
0
0
Aug -89
Aug-89
6.400
300,969
300,969
211,411
Sep -89
Sep -89
6.400
0
0
0
Oct-89
Oct-89
6.400
0
0
0
Nov -89
Nov-89
6.400
0
0
0
Dec -89
Dec -89
6.400
0
0
300,969
Jan -90
Jan-90
6.400
0
0
0
Feb-90
Feb-90
6.400
300,969
300,969
253,694
Mar -90
Mar -90
6.400
0
0
0
Apr-90
Apr-90
6.400
0
0
0
May -90
May -90
6.400
0
0
0
Jun -90
Jun-90
6.400
0
0
0
Jul -90
Jul -90
6.400
0
0
0
Aug -90
Aug-90
6.400
300,969
300,969
253,694
Sep -90
Sep-90
6.400
0
0
0
Oct -90
Oct-90
6.400
0
0
0
Nov -90
Nov -90
6.400
0
0
0
Dec -90
Dec-90
6.400
0
0
601,938
Jan-91
Jan -91
6.400
0
0
0
Feb -91
Feb-91
6.400
300,969
300,969
253,694
Mar -91
Mar -91
6.400
0
0
0
Apr -91
Apr -91
6.400
0
0
0
May -91
Nay -91
6.400
0
0
0
Jun -91
Jun-91
6.400
0
0
0
Jul-91
JuL -91
6.400
0
0
0
Aug -91
Aug -91
6.400
300,969
300,969
253,694
Sep -91
Sep -91
6.400
0
0
0
Oct -91.
Oct -91
6.400
0
0
0
Nov -91
Nov -91
6.400
0
0
0
..� 11"M wmw� aa"
PREPARED BY Pubtie Finanetat System, Inc. (JRF) DATE: 06- Feb -89 PAGE 7
�..........
1989 TAXABLE
...........
5,300,000
ANNUAL
PRINCIPAL
RATE
INTEREST
PRINCIPAL
DEBT
DATE
. ..................................
PAYMENTS
(X)
PAYMENTS
...............................
& INTEREST
SERVICE
Jan-88
9.200
0
0
Feb-88
9.200
0
0
Mar -88
9.200
0
0
Apr -88
9.200
0
0
May-88
9.200
0
0
Jun-88
9.200
0
0
Jul -88
9.200
0
0
Aug -88
9.200
0
0
Sep -88
9.200
0
0
Oct-88
9.200
0
0
Nov-88
9.200
0
0
Dec-88
9.200
0
0
0
Jan -89
9.200
0
0
Feb -89
9.200
0
0
Mar -89
9.200
0
0
Apr -89
9.200
0
0
May -89
9.200
0
0
-
Jun -89
9.200
0
0
Jul -89
9.200
0
0
Aug-89
9.200
211,411
211,411
Sep -89
9.200
0
0
Oct-89
9.200
0
0
Nov-89
9.200
0
0
Dec -89
9.200
0
0
211,411
Jan-90
9.200
0
0
Feb-90
9.200
253,694
253,694
Mar -90
9.200
0
0
Apr-90
9.200
0
0
May -90
9.200
0
0
Jun-90
9.200
0
0
Jul -90
9.200
0
0
Aug-90
9.200
253,694
253,694
Sep-90
9.200
0
0
Oct-90
9.200
0
0
Nov -90
9.200
0
0
Dec-90
9.200
0
0
507,388
Jan -91
9.200
0
0
Feb-91
9.200
253,694
253,694
Mar -91
9.200
0
0
Apr -91
9.200
0
0
Nay -91
9.200
0
0
Jun-91
9.200
0
0
JuL -91
9.200
0
0
Aug -91
9.200
253,694
253,694
Sep -91
9.200
0
0
Oct -91
9.200
0
0
Nov -91
9.200
0
0
PREPARED BY Pubtie Finanetat System, Inc. (JRF) DATE: 06- Feb -89 PAGE 7
---11p Fw..z� u-Aw, .w"� iWWWWY �.0C, WY0�
I �
CENTENNIAL LAKES CASH FLOW ANALYSIS - G.O. TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1989
I----- - - - -- 1989 TAX-EXEMPT ------ - - - -.I
.......... ..... ................. ..............
8,425,000 9,687,468 18,112,468 17,811,499
zzzzzaazazsm zz azsoaaasazzzaazaes= zzaaazaazaaa
�.......... 1989 TAXABLE ...........
5,300,000 ANNUAL
PRINCIPAL RATE INTEREST PRINCIPAL DEBT
DATE PAYMENTS (X) PAYMENTS 8 INTEREST SERVICE
... ............................... ...--- ..........
Dec -91 9.200 0 0
Feb-92
8,425,000
9.200
253,694
253,694
ANNUAL
Aug -92
PRINCIPAL
RATE
INTEREST
PRINCIPAL
DEBT
DATE
..................................
PAYMENTS
(X)
PAYMENTS
...............................
a INTEREST
SERVICE
Dec -91_
6.400
0
0
Feb. 92
6.400 .
300,969
. 300,969
. . 601,938
Aug -92
6.400
300,969
300,969
Feb -93
125,000
6.400
300,969
300,969
601,938
Aug -93
6.400
300,969
300,969
Feb -94
50,000
6.400
300,969
300,969
601,938
Aug -94
6.400
300,969
300,969
Feb -95
225,000
6.400
300,969
525,969
826,938
Au9-95
6.400
293,769
293,769
Feb -96
75,000
6.500
293,769
368,769
662,538
Aug -96
6.500
291,331
291,331
Feb -97
125,000
6.600
291,331
416,331
707,662
Aug -97
6.600
287,206
287,206
Feb -98
200,000
6.700
287,206
487,206
774,412
Aug -98
6.700
280,506
280,506
Feb -99
275,000
6.800
280,506
555,506
836,012
Aug -99
6.800
271,156
271,156
Feb -2000
350,000
6.900
271,156
621,156
892,312
Aug -2000
6.900
259,081.
259,081
Feb -2001
375,000
7.000
259,081
634,081
893,162
Aug -2001
7.000
245,956
245,956
Feb -2002
450,000
7.050
245,956
695,956
941,912
Aug -2002
7.050
230,094
230,094
Feb -2003
500,000
7.100
230,094
730,094
960,188
Aug -2003
7.100
212,344
.212,344
Feb -2004
575,000
7.150
212,344
787,344
999,688
Aug -2004
7.150
191,788
191,788
Feb - 2005
600,000
7.200
191,788
791,788
983,576
Aug -2005
7.200
170,188
170,188
Feb - 2006
700,000
7.250
170,188
870,188
1,040,376
Aag•2006
7.250
144,813
144,813
Feo•2007
1,100,000
7.250
144,813
1,244,813
1,389,626
Aug -2007
............
5,300,000
7.250
104,938
104,938
13,153,679
Feb -2008
1,375,000
7.300
104,938
1,479,938
1,584,876
Aug -2008
7.300
54,750
54,750
Feb -2009
1,500,000
_7.300
54,750
1,554,750
1,609,500
.......... ..... ................. ..............
8,425,000 9,687,468 18,112,468 17,811,499
zzzzzaazazsm zz azsoaaasazzzaazaes= zzaaazaazaaa
�.......... 1989 TAXABLE ...........
5,300,000 ANNUAL
PRINCIPAL RATE INTEREST PRINCIPAL DEBT
DATE PAYMENTS (X) PAYMENTS 8 INTEREST SERVICE
... ............................... ...--- ..........
Dec -91 9.200 0 0
Feb-92
9.200
253,694
253,694
507,388
Aug -92
9.200
253,694
253,694
Feb -93
9.200
253,694
253,694
507,388
Aug -93
9.200
253,694
253,694
Feb -94
9.200
253,694
253,694
507,388
Aug -94
9.200
253,694
253,694
Feb -95
125,000
9.200
253,694
378,694
632,388
Aug -95
9.200
247,944
247,944
Feb -96
50,000
9.250
247,944
297,944
545,888
Aug -96
9.250
245,631
245,631
Feb -97
75,000
9.300
245,631
320,631
566,262
Aug -97
9.300
242,144
242,144
Feb -98
125,000
9.350
242,144
367,144
609,288
Aug -98
9.350
236,300
236,300
Feb -99
175,000
9.350
236,300
411,300
617,600
Aug-99
9.350
228,119
228,119
Feb -2000
225,D00
9.400
228,119
453,119
661,238
Aug -2000
9.400
217,544
217,544
Feb - 2001
250,000
9.400
217,544
467,544
685,088
Aug -2001
9.400
205,794
205,744
Feb -2002
275,000
9.450
205,794
480,794
686,588
Aug -2002
9.450
192,800
192,800
Feb -2003
325,000
9.450
192,800
517,800
710,600
Aug -2003
9.450
177,444
177,444
Feb -2004
375,000
9.500
177,444
552,444
729,888
Aug -2004
9.500
159,631
159,631
Feb -2005
375,000
9.550
159,631
534,631
694,262
Aug -2005
9.550
141,725
141,725
Feb -2006
400,000
9.600
141,725
541,725
683,450
Aug -2006
9.600
122,525
122,525
Feb - 2007
700,000
9.650
122,525
822,525
945,050
Aug -2007
9.650
88,750
88,750
Feb -2008
875,000
9.700
88,750
963,750
1,052,500
Aug -2008
9.700
46,313
46,313
Feb - 2009
950,000
9.750
46,313
996,313
1,042,626
............
5,300,000
...... ..............................
8,107,373
13,407,373
13,153,679
azzsazazasaz
zzaaa= azaaazaaa
PREPARED BY Publle Financial $"tow, Inc. (JRF) DATE: 06- Feb -89 PAGE 8
8/1/88
215
(7) to the possession of a controlled substance by public officers or
/1 employees while in the performance of official duties requiring such possession
or control.
Sec. 4. Fraud. It shall be unlawful for any person to sell or procure,
attempt to sell or procure, or possess or have in his control a controlled
substance by:
(1) fraud, deceit, misrepresentation, or subterfuge; or
(2) the use of a false name or address; or
(3) forgery or alteration of a prescription; or
(4) giving false credit; or
(5) making, issuing, or uttering any false or forged prescription; or
(6) falsely assuming the title of, or falsely representing-any person to
be, a manufacturer, wholesaler, pharmacist, physician, doctor of osteopathy
licensed to practice medicine, dentist, podiatrist, veterinarian, or other
authorized person for the purpose of obtaining a controlled substance.
Sec. 5. Penalty. Any person who violates any of the provisions of this
Ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor except as provided in Minn. Stat.
152.15 Subd. 2(5), (6) and (7) and subject to the penalties set forth in Edina
City Ordinance No. 175, the provisions of which are hereby incorporated in and
made a part of this Ordinance as completely as if set out herein in full.
Sec. 6. Confiscation and Disposition of Prohibited Drums. Any controlled
substance found in the possession of any person convicted of a violation of this
NOrdinance shall be confiscated and shall be forfeited to the Chief of Police,
who shall make proper and timely disposition thereof by destroying them.
LO Sec. 7. Use of Original Containers and Labels Required. All patients
Lo having possession of any controlled substance, by lawful prescription of a
licensed medical doctor while such controlled substances are lawfully in such
person's possession, shall keep such controlled substances in the original
4 W container in which they were delivered until used in accordance with such
prescription, and shall not remove the pharmacist's original label identifying
the prescription from such original container.
Sec. 8. Repealer. Ordinance No. 1011 is hereby repealed in its entirety.
Sec. 9. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
Immediately upon its passage and publication.
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member urner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney ��
Ordinance adopted. MAYor
ATTEST:— 07h Clerk
BID AWARDED FOR RENOVATION OF BRAEMAR PAVILION - PHASE II A & B. Robert
Christianson, Chairman of Edina Park Board, made the presentation on renovation
of Braemar Pavilion as follows. Several months ago the Park Board was presented
with a plan whereby Braemar Pavilion would be rehabilitated, Braemar Golf Course
would be upgraded with an additional nine holes, and the Golf Dome would be
acquired by the City. The Park Board spent considerable time on the issue and
made some recommendations to the Council. Subsequently, the Council accepted
the first part of the recommendations which was to immediately proceed to
replace the ice surface in the pavilion and instructed staff to obtain bids on
that portion and also to obtain bids on a second phase of the pavilion
rehabilitation which was to change the structure of the building itself, making
it much more affirmative in nature and more energy efficient. The balance of
the recommendation were basically put on hold, i.e. the addition of the nine
holes and the acquisition of the Golf Dome. Since that time there has been an
award of bid for the replacement of the ice surface. The architects presented a
bid package for the second phase and bids were received for the pavilion
renovation. A special Park Board meeting was held on July 28, 1988 to discuss
the bid for the purpose of making a recommendation to the Council and the
minutes of the meeting accurately describe the discussion. The Park Board
recommended approval of Phase II A (completion of pavilion with locker
rooms /walls) and B (completion of commons) of the Braemar Pavilion project;
approval, as an offset to the expense, the Braemar Golf Course project that
would include nine holes, looking into the possibility of purchasing the Golf
Dome, and looking into the purchase of Normandale Golf Course from Opus. The
profits from these golf facilities are to offset the expense generated by the
Braemar Pavilion project. It was also recommended that the revenues generated
by the existing Braemar Golf Course facility, - excluding the new nine hole
course, remain within that facility's budget. Mr. Christianson concluded by
saying that the total package is a significant dollar expenditure and is a major
undertaking. Bob Kojetin, Director of Parks and Recreation, then presented
financial data in support of the recommendations and figures to back up revenue
in order to renovate the Braemar Arena and Pavilion at a total cost of
$1,819,200 and to award the bid of $1,020,000 for Phase II A and B. Phase II
consists of locker rooms and permanent walls for the pavilion, and the commons
building which would connect the arena and pavilion. He recalled that at the
May 2, 1988 meeting the Council awarded a bid for $691,200 for the renovation of
the refrigeration equipment in the pavilion. At that meeting the Council had
approved proceeding with architectural drawings for the total Braemar
Arena - Pavilion Renovation. Architectural fees for the total project are
$108,000. Budget projections totaling $1.5 million for the construction of the
216
8/1/88
nep nine hole golf course were presented. Revenues showed a net profit of
roximately $135,000. Total cost of construction at the Braemar 18 hole
urse for a new A -frame building, golf cart storage, parking lot improvements
and upgrading the old clubhouse roof is projected at $550,000. With regard to
the possibility of purchasing the Edina Golf Dome, Mr. Kojetin said we are still
waiting for an independent appraiser's results of cost. Projected revenue and
expense for the Golf Dome showed estimated operating income at build out of
$43,000. If Normandale Golf Course is acquired, it is recommended that it be
operated for a period of years before the course would be renovated.
Projections of the revenue that is received at that course in today's market
indicate that we would be able to realize approximately $50,000 per year.
Recently the irrigation system has been upgraded along with some soil condition
renovation. Projected net revenue from the new nine hole golf course is
$135,000. Other projected revenues: Edina Hockey Association and Braemar Figure
Skating Club have committed to $15.00 per member. Skating lessons would have a
$5.00 per skater charge, similar to the field use charge for other athletic
associations. The current Golf Dome lease guarantees $9,000 plus a percentage
of gross over $150,000. In the last few years the gross has exceeded $150,000.
Mr. Kojetin noted that the 1987 Capital Plan has projected $215,000 through the
year 1995 for renovation of the pavilion, exclusive of $20,000 for the furnace
at the arena and an ice resurfaces in 1990. He proposed spreading this over 20
years at $10,000 per year. It is also proposed to increase the ice rental ftom
$85 to $90 per hour starting the fall of 1990. Total revenues were projected at
approximately $190,000 per year. Bond run projections are based on an average
of a 20 -year period of $189,500. During the first two years, 1989 and 1990, the
bond payments would be $154,615. In conclusion, Mr. Kojetin said that staff
feels that we will have projected revenue for the arena and pavilion of $190,000
over a 20 -year period and recommends award of bid to low bidder, Eagan
' onstruction Company, Inc., at $1,020,000 for construction of Braemar Arena
anovation Phase II A and B. Staff concurs with the second recommendation of
the Park Board that the budgets of the nine hole course and the 18 hole complex
be separate and that the net profit of the nine hole course be used to support
other recreational activities, or in this situation, to pay the bond service for
the arena - pavilion renovation. Profits from the 18 hole complex would be used
as in the past to upgrade and keep this a premier facility. Considerable
discussion and questioning by the Council followed which included the increase
in demand for golf course season ticket sales, Golf Dome revenues under the
present lease, philosophy of deployment of City assets, segregation of
recreational operating funds, parking lot improvement to Braemar Golf Course,
need for sprinklers over the pavilion ice, cost of maintaining additional
facilities and depreciation, timing for the bonds sale, cost comparison with
other cities' facilities, etc. (Member Richards left the meeting at this
point.) John Vallerie, Braemar Golf Course Manager, expressed two concerns: 1)
that we not unfavorably impact on the cost of golf for residents, and 2)
segregation of funds and ability to meet any potential future crises at the golf
course. Roger Harrold, member of the Golf Committee, observed that the City
needs to take a close look at the long term solution to the arena and pavilion's
financial problems so that it may not have to rely on other operations to save
itself. As to the projected revenue from the new 9 hole course, he said he felt
they were realistic. As to revenue from golf facilities being used for other
recreational needs, he said he was not necessarily opposed if assurances can be
made for future needs of the golf course. He added that the course itself will
need rejuvenation in the future, with some greens needing total redesign and
tees needing rebuilding. Following lengthy discussion, Member Turner made a
motion to approve the Park Board recommendation for the Braemar Arena Phase II
'.anovation with award of bid to recommended low bidder, Eagan Construction
ompany, Inc., at $1,020,000; and to approve construction of the new 9 hole golf
course and improvements to the Braemar 18 hole Golf Complex as described in the
proposal, subject to bids being awarded following the proposed bond sale.
Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Member Turner stated that the motion for
approval was based on these reasons: 1) that the arena is an asset to the
community that needs to be brought to a level of quality that the community
expects, 2) in terms of adding the new 9 hole course, the demand is incredible
and there is a need to provide that kind of facility to meet the needs of the
changing demographics in the community, and 3) additions to the 18 hole course
is a way to keep that facility in top quality. She said there is tremendous
justification for proceeding with the project pending the outcome of the bond
sale.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
t
*ELECTION JUDGES APPOINTED FOR PRIMARY ELECTION ON 9/13/88. Motion was made by
Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner for adoption of the following
resolution:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that_the following election judges be
appointed to serve on the election boards for the Primary Election to be held on
September 13, 1988, and that the City Clerk be and is hereby authorized to make
EDINA -- PARK BOARD- — --
7:30 p.m.
February 14, 1989
Edina City Hall
MEMBERS PRESENT: Bob Christianson, Bill Lord, Andrew Montgomery, Bill Jenkins, Jim Fee,
Jean Rydell, Mac Thayer, Don Wineberg
MEMBERS ABSENT: Itti Furlong, Scott Johnson
STAFF PRESENT: Bob Kojetin, John Keprios, Susan Weigle, Larry Thayer, John Val liere,
Stacey Kness
OTHERS PRESENT: Joanne Demco, Roseann Anderson, Margit Ferguson, Elsie Hoffharber,
Tass von Schmidt -Pauli
Bob Christianson called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
I. APPROVAL OF JANUARY 10, 1989, MEETING MINUTES
Jean Rydell MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE JANUARY 10, 1989, MEETING. Mac
Thayer seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
II. SENIOR CENTER BUS TRANSPORTATION
Susan Weigle, Senior Center Coordinator, stated the new Senior Center location is
acceptable, but many people cannot get there. Ms. Weigle proposed to the Park Board
to recommend increasing the transportation program to get the seniors to the Center
for congregate dining. Ms. Weigle then introduced Joanne Demco of Volunteers of
America, the organization running the congregate dining program. Mrs. Demco stated
congregate dining enables seniors to.get out of the house. Volunteers of America has
been offering this service in Edina for 11 years. Last year they served 22,000 meals
to people of which approximately 30 percent are below the poverty level in Edina. The
suggested donation is $1.25 for each congregate meal. The majority of congregate
diners is quite old and frail. The average age throughout the Anoka - Hennepin area is
74 years; the average age in Edina,is 77 years. Congregate dining is an opportunity
for people to come together to have lunch which is more like a dinner. For many
people it is the main meal of the day; most come for socialization. Volunteers of
America's funding comes from Metropolitan Council. Mrs. Demco is encouraged with the
new Senior Center location, but the key to a successful congregate dining program is
transportation. She strongly urged the Park Board to consider the request.
Mr. Jenkins asked if there were transportation problems at the previous site. Mrs.
Demco answered we were in a high rise area with many seniors close by, so there was
not the same problem. We were serving 90 people per day.
Mr. Christianson asked how many people -are being served now. Mrs. Demco said
congregate dining has only been offered for a week at the new site, so averages have
not been figured. Approximately 30 people have attended each day.
Mr. Wineberg asked how many programs does Volunteers of America serve. Mrs. Demco
said congregate dining is being offered at 42 locations.
Mr. Christianson asked if the numbers of people are down because of the new
location. Elsie Hoffharber, the congregate dining coordinator at the Senior Center,
indicated she had looked through old records to see how many people had come from the
large complexes on York Avenue. Transportation was easy at that time. Many people
would love to come from the York Avenue area but cannot get to the new Center. Of
- 1 -
the present participants, many people drive or live in the immediate neighborhood.
Those who need the congregate dining service the most are the ones now who cannot
come.
Mr. Kojetin indicated the City will be subsidizing 20 cents per meal instead of the
originally proposed 50 cents per meal. Mr. Kojetin has contacted the School District
to discuss the cost per day of renting a bus to transport people in the York Avenue
area (7200 York, 7400 York, 3400 Parklawn, 7500 York, and 7151 York) to and from the
Center. Approximately 54 people have expressed a need for rides to the center and
back each day. The School District would charge $35 per day for a school bus which.
can accommodate 50 people. The per day rate comes to $9100 per year since meals are
served 260 days per year. Mr. Kojetin indicated several different options for this
need. We could consider charging 50 cents daily which would lower the yearly cost to
$2800. If this is favorable, we could be looking at an increase in our operating
budget. The present bus holds ten people and makes three runs to average 27 people
per day being transported to and from the Center. This bus picks up people in
isolated areas of the City that are not close-to the York Avenue area.
Ms. Weigle said there are 60 new members since we have opened. 80 percent of the new
members have been in the 55424 and 55436 zip code areas of the city.
Mr. Christianson asked if there is a charge for the present bus. Ms. Weigle said no,
and we use volunteer drivers.
Mrs. Rydell asked how many people using congregate dining live below the poverty
level. Mrs. Demco said if people were coming from the York Avenue side of town, a
charge for the bus could be a problem for them.
Mr. Wineberg said there could be a problem with one bus charging and the other bus
being free.
Mr. Christianson asked if there are any other sources of funds available such as
grants. Mrs. Demco said she does not have money in her budget, but the West Metro
Transportation project does have some funds for other communities.
Mr. Christianson asked if it is possible to contact them for funding. Mrs. Demco
said it would take about a year to go through the request process.
Ms. Weigle indicated Paratransit charges $10 per year and $1 each way for handicapped
riders.
Mr. Christianson said if we received funding from West Metro, we could not charge
anything but there could be a suggested donation. Mrs. Demco said sometimes West
Metro gives qualifying cities a van, and the city has to come up with.a driver. They
have limited dollars.
Mr. Christianson asked Mrs. Demco if a charge was levied for bus transportation and
if it caused the participants to make a smaller donation to the congregate dining
program, would it adversely affect your program. Mrs. Demco said her grant would
absorb it because they feel the program is beneficial.
Mr. Jenkins asked what is the largest number of people you could serve. Mrs. Demco
said 100.
Mr. Kojetin asked Elsie if there had been any comment on the Center being located on
the third floor. Elsie said she has not heard any negative comments on the
location. People are just glad there is a center available. Mr. Kojetin added the
handicap accessible elevator could be completed by May 15.
- 2 -
w
Mr. Jenkins asked if there is a pocket of seniors in the City we could be missing.
Mr. Kojetin said the Summit Hill complex may be interested.
Roseann Anderson, active Senior Center member, indicated many people in the 7151 York
building are unhappy with the re- location. There are 55 people from the 7151
building who attended congregate dining regularly. They would,be happy to do it
again since congregate dining brightens their day.
Ms. Weigle shared some examples of individuals who benefit greatly from congregate
dining who depend on outside transportation to get to the Senior Center.
Mr. Christianson said there are several questions to be answered: do we proceed with
transportation; on what basis; and how long.
Mr. Lord asked if there are any funds in the Park and Recreation budget that could be
utilized. Mr. Kojetin said there could be $3,000 available to go towards a
transportation program. .
Mr. Christianson suggested subsidizing a program on a trial basis and continued
trying to get funds then revisit the issue.
Mr. Montgomery asked if Ms. Weigle had solicited churches for any contributions. Ms.
Weigle said we do count on churches for people from the VEAP program.
Mr. Jenkins said $3000 is a full year at 50 cents per person per ride. Is it an
option to run the bus for four months without charging the riders while we consider
-other revenue sources.
Ms. Weigle said she would like to see what happens if we establish a trial
transportation program. Mrs. Demco said four moths would give us the opportunity to
prove we have a need when considering other options.
Don Wineberg moved THAT THE PARK BOARD WORK WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICT ON A FOUR -MONTH
TRIAL BASIS TO RENT A BUS FOR SENIOR CENTER TRANSPORTATION. Bill Lord seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Mr. Christianson added the four months must be used as an opportunity to explore
other options, monitor how the service is being used, and report back to the Park
Board after three months so we can see where the program is. Possibly in meantime
the city staff can investigate some other sources of revenue outside of our'annual
budget.
Mr. Keprios said if the future brings free transportation for the able bodies, how
will the handicapped population respond. Mr. Christianson said but they use special
equipment and they are taken to wherever they want to go. That really is a different
situation not to be compared with our situation.
III. NAMING OF THE MASTER PLAN
Mr. Kojetin distributed a sheet with several suggested plan names. Mr. Wineberg
asked that "Jupiter" be added as a suggestion. Mr. Kojetin asked the Park Board
members to think about these names and be prepared to discuss them at the next
meeting.
IV. GOLF COURSE UPDATE
Mr. Kojetin indicated a final layout has not yet been accomplished. Mr. Valliere
said we are trying to come up with a plan that will please all three agencies (Corps
of Engineers, Watershed District, and the Department of Natural Resources). The
layout problems stem from the hill on the east side of the ridge.
- 3 -
f
It was asked how the layout delay will affect the estimated opening date. Mr.
Valliere indicated we are slightly off the target date of the summer of 1990.
Construction may begin this summer on the high and dry areas and continue with the
low areas in the winter of 1989. He said we are about two months behind.
Mr. Christianson asked how does the delay impact the revenue projections. Mr.
Kojetin indicated if we open in the spring of 1991 or late fall of 1990, we would be
able to meet the debt service since there is not a big payment until 1992.
Mr. Wineberg asked if the changes in the 9 -hole course will affect the 18 -hole course
at all. Mr. Valliere said there are only two holes that may be slightly changed.
Mr. Kojetin distributed a Financial Bonding sheet and said the Council is receiving
this handout at the next Council meeting on recommending bids for bonds. We would
not take money out of the 18 -hole course to finance other areas of Braemar.
Referring to the handout, Mr. Montgomery asked why the 9 -hole course shows a larger
net income before debt service than the 18 -hole course. Mr. Kojetin explained
because we are putting more money in capital improvement at the 18 -hole course such
as building new tees and improving greens and fairways. That money has been taken
out of the net. For example, in 1989, $95,000 will be used for equipment
replacement, green and tee improvements, and old clubhouse equipment upgrade.
Mr. Christianson asked how many years we will be paying the $597,000 debt service.
Mr. Kojetin said for 20 years. The total bond consists of the original clubhouse
construction, Arena remodeling, the golf dome purchase, and $2.1 million for the new
9 -hole course and parking lot.
Mr. Christianson asked the total amount of the.bond issue. Mr. Kojetin said the
total bond debt service would be $12 million.
Mr. Christianson asked if there are any figures on the golf dome. Mr. Kojetin said
the year -to -date income is $133,000 which is up $20,000 over last year. We do not
have the final figures audited from 1988 yet, but we are doing very well. Mr.
Valliere indicated we are on a good track right now.
Mr. Jenkins referred to the handout and asked where the income at the arena comes
from. Mr. Kojetin said this -is the net before depreciation.
V. ARENA UPDATE
Mr. Kojetin indicated State Code says buildings must be sprinkled according to their
size. The Arena West (original arena) falls into the size category that must be
sprinkled. The Fire Department also recommends that we loop and connect the two
water lines at the arena. The proposal is to continue the loop line to 78th Street
along 169 (old County Road 18). The reason for this recommendation is if the
Courtney Fields are being automatically irrigated over night and there is a fire at
the arena,.there may not be enough pressure to activate the sprinkler system.
Connecting the two lines would eliminate this possibility.
Mr. Christianson asked about the cost of sprinkling and looping the water lines.
Larry Thayer indicated it could cost $29,000 to sprinkle the West Arena. The loop
would be charged per foot from hydrant to hydrant. Mr. Kojetin said it could be
$50,000 just for the loop.
Mr. Christianson asked if that would come out of our budget. Mr. Kojetin said we
propose that some City Water funds could assist with the cost.
- 4 -
Request for use of Braemar West Arena
Mr. Thayer distributed a memo regarding Edina High School's request to use Braemar
Arena for 1989 commencement. He indicated the only modifications needed are removing
the glass and two 8 -foot sections of boards. He feels it is a goodwill factor on our
part. It is not a money -maker for us, but we can accommodate their request. In the
past, their alternative sites have been very small and not very nice. They will own
and store the floor covering.
Mr. Kojetin said the total capacity of the Arena would allow for about seven guests
per graduate which the School District feels is adequate. Mr. Thayer said they will
have to have very tight ticket control so they do not exceed the maximum of 3600
people.
Mr. Christianson confirmed that the School District will pay for all out -of- pocket
expenses i.e. employee preparation time, any modifications that will have to be made,
and they will provide the floor covering. Mr.- Thayer said that is correct.
Mr. Jenkins asked what the arena is being used for at that time of year. Mr. Thayer
said our two facility ice season is normally down to one sheet of ice at that time of
year, so it is convenient to be shutting down one of the two.
Mr. Christianson indicated it is a goodwill factor and there is nothing out of our
budget.
Jim Fee MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO COUNCIL TO HONOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT'S REQUEST TO
CONDUCT THE 1989 COMMENCEMENT EXERCISES IN BRAEMAR ARENA. Don Wineberg seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
VI. VAN VALKENBURG PARK UPDATE
Mr. Kojetin introduced John Keprios to give an update and review the plans of the
proposed Van Valkenburg control building and fencing for the softball fields. Mr.
Keprios reviewed the plans of the control building. He indicated the lack of funds
to complete the entire project with lights this year. Instead of installing lights,
fencing, and the building, we are going to accept bids on the building and the
fencing. The balance of 1989's capital dollars is $195,206. Mr. Keprios indicated
some architectural drawings of the building. It will have a 15' x 34' meeting
room /concession area on the ground floor with restrooms and a storage and mechanical
room. The upper floor will have scoring and control rooms for all three fields. The
entire building will be heated and air conditioned.
Mr. Jenkins asked what the meeting room will be used for. Mr. Keprios said it will
be used for managers meetings, association meetings, tournaments, trophy
distribution, concession area, etc.
Mr. Valliere asked if there are funds available to make the meeting area larger. Mr.
Keprios said the proposed size of the room is adequate. It will also be used as an
eating and gathering place when not being used for meetings.
Mr. Keprios indicated the anticipated cost of the building is $160,000 and the
fencing is $30- 40,000. It could cost an additional $110,000 to light all three
fields. It could cost $316,000 to totally complete the project; we are short
$120,000.
Mr. Christianson asked if the park will be operational without lights. Mr. Keprios
said yes, it will be operational.
Mr. Kojetin mentioned we can install lighting one field at a time. We can build the
lights into the budget. Without lights, two games can be played on each field; with
lights, four games can be played on each field.
- 5 -
Mr. Jenkins asked if there is any way the entire project can be completed at one ti-
such as adding it to the bond. Mr. Keprios said Van Valkenburg Park is not a rever,
facility and would not be eligible for this type of bond.
Mr. Montgomery asked when the fields will be playable. Mr. Keprios said the 1990
season is the target date. With construction of the building and fencing, it would
be difficult to safely conduct the entire 1989 season.
VII. CITY COUNCIL MEETING UPDATE
Mr. Keprios attended the February 6, 1989, City Council meeting and updated the Park
Board on key issues. He indicated the Council does not want a rigid policy on
renting and leasing park facilities. They are looking for some guidelines. (see
attached) The final answer to the Dekhockey proposal was negative. It was suggested
at the Council meeting that more promotion of Lewis Park be done, specifically the
blacktop area inside the hockey boards.
Mr. Christianson stated we were asked to.give• the Council our recommendation on
Dekhockey. He is disappointed about the outcome.
Mr. Kojetin said the Park Board acted according to the Council's request and did
their job.
Mr. Christianson said it is unfortunate that Mr. Keprios was the sole representative
of the Park Board's recommendations at the Council meeting. He stated some Park
Board members should have been there. Mr. Keprios said it was okay; it was a good
experience.
VIII.OTHER
Mr. Christianson indicated the Mayor's Award Reception on April 25 from 5 to 7 pm.
He suggested the board members think about who they would like to nominate and wair
for suggestions from the athletic associations and discuss this as an agenda item i
March. Mr. Fee asked if Wally Irwin has received any awards in the past. Mr.
Christianson said Mr. Irwin received the Community Endowment Award in 1987.
Mr. Kojetin indicated at the February 6; 1989, Council meeting, the Council
recommended looking into purchasing the property in the White Oaks neighborhood. The
property's assessed value is $26,600. The Council recommended that the neighborhood
association come up with 50 percent of the assessed value. Mr. Conner Schmid
indicated to Mr. Kojetin that the neighbors have collected $8,000. They would have
to come up with $13,000 if the City could purchase the property at $26,600.
IX. ADJOURNMENT
Bill Jenkins MOVED TO ADJOURN AT 9:30 PM. _Jim Fee seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED.
ITEMS FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL:
Don Wineberg moved THAT THE PARK BOARD WORK WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICT ON A FOUR -MONTH
TRIAL BASIS TO RENT A BUS FOR SENIOR CENTER TRANSPORTATION. Bill Lord seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Jim Fee MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO COUNCIL TO HONOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT'S REQUEST TO
CONDUCT THE 1989 COMMENCEMENT EXERCISES IN BRAEMAR-ARENA. Don Wineberg seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
- 6 -
SUGGESTED TITLES
1• "The Year 2000 Park and Recreation Plan"
2• "The Edina Park and Recreation Plan for the Year 2000"
3• "A Committment to Quality for the Year 2000"
4• "The Year 2000 Plan - A Committment to Quality"
5• "Premier In The Year 2000"
6. "A Comprehensive Plan for the Year 2000"-
7. "A Comprehensive Plan - A Committment to Quality"
8• "The Comprehensive Plan"
9• "Park and Recreation Plan for the 21st Century"
10. "The 21st Century Park Plan"
r 11. "A Park and Recreation Plan - A Committment to Excellence"
s .12• "Edina Park and Recreation - The Next Century"
13. "Park Plan 2000 - A Step .into the 21st Century"
14. "Park and Recreation 2000"
15. "2001 - A Park and Recreation Odyssey"
Is I
�...,,..: EA/1-AR
ARENA
CITY OF EDINA
7501 South County Road 18 • Edina Minnesota 55435 • (612) 941 -1322
MEMORANDUM
-TO: Edina Park Board and City Council
FROM: Larry Thayer, Manager - Braemar Arena
RE: Commencement Ceremonies at Braemar Arena
DATE: February 9, 1989
I have received a request to hold the 1989 commencement exercises at Braemar Arena.
Gordon Hughes and I have been in close communications with Jim Hamann, Director of
Business —Edina School District, and Bob Lynch, Principal —Edina High School, to finalize
details in order to host such an event at Braemar's West Arena. The event will not have a
rental fee involved, however the Edina High School will cover any costs incurred by the
arena's participation in the event. I felt it would be appropriate to seek your approval
regarding this event.
cc. Ken Rosland
Gordon Hughes
Bob Kojetin
Edina Park and )recreation Department
FINANCIAL BONDING - BRAEMAR FACILITIES
REVENUE & DEBT
EXPENSES NET SERVICE
BRAEMAR ARENA Rev 438,000
Exp 402.000
..............36,000
COMMITMENT: EDINA HOCKEY ASSOCIATION,
BRAEMAR FIGURE SKATING CLUB,
BRAEMAR SKATING LESSONS, CAPITAL PLAN ... .........................25,000
GOLF DOME
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
Clubhouse 1986 Remodeling
New A -Frame and Cart Storage
Parking Lot
Clubhouse Energy Upgrade
NEW 9 -HOLE COURSE
TOTALS
- AVERAGE INTEREST PAYMENTS
Rev 225,000
Exp 98.000
.............127,000
Rev 1,149,000
Exp 736.000
.............413,000
Rev 443,000
Exp 148.000
.............285.000
886,000
TOTAL PAYMENTS NO. OF YEARS
11,040,845 20 552.000
DIFFERENCE 334.000
COMPONENTS OF RECREATIONAL FACILITY BOND ISSUE
Nine -Hole Golf Course $1,200,000
Well 300,000
Parking Lot 300,000
Buildings 250.000
Total Project Cost $2,050,000
japitalized Interest 0
Costs of Issuance 19,000
Discount 31.000
Total Bond Issue $2,100,000
189,503
55,000
148,000
55,000
150.000
597.503
GUIDELINES CONCERNING LEASING REQUESTS
OF PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT FACILITIES
Every request to lease Edina Park and Recreation Department Facilities (other
than the enterprise facilities) will be reviewed individually. Each request
will be given equal consideration and will be judged on its own merit. As a
guideline, the following questions will be asked of each request:
*Is the requested use one that is in keeping with the Edina Park and
Recreation Department mission statement?
*Will the activity have a positive impact on the total park and recreation
program?
*Will the activity likely be a successful recreation program?
*Will the Edina Park and Recreation Department have adequate control over
the proposed activity?
*What'depreciation impact will the activity have on the facility and /or
equipment?
*Will the elimination-of public access to the facility during this lease be
an acceptable level?
*Will the dollars collected in the lease be worthy of the expenses incurred?
*Will the activity have an impact on the environmental surrounding (positive
or negative)? In other words, will the neighbors and /or general public
view this activity as a nuisance?
*Will the City of Edina be held liable for any of these activities?
*Is this activity a worthwhile risk?
*Does the requesting party have adequate insurance coverage including a
rider for the City of Edina?
*Is the leasing request in keeping with the facility's policies?
*Is the length of the lease acceptable?
*Will this activity have any impact on other organizations such as the Edina
School District, Community Education, private businesses etc.?
The above questions are simply a guideline to determine the appropriateness of
each and every leasing request. Other questions may surface when considering a
specific request. Each and every leasing request will be judged on its own
merit.
a
a
a
r
d
w
L
i
i
i
low
to
r
1999 Ci X EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT
CHECK RL fER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
02 -21 -89 E 1
ACCOUNT NO. INV. 4 P.O. M MESSAGE I"
r
U
z
041W08 02/07/89
83.64
W.W. GRAINGER
PARTS
40- 4540 - 805 -80
8980
2
3
•
83.64
to
J
�
4
5
* * * * *>~
-
**,p-CKS
J
�6 j
6
7
e
i
TD t'
— — —
o
6
-
29.90
to
1O
D
11
10
05 i�7 -� Tf 3
%-b-0—
- ED�CAFDER --
M LEAO•E—
- - -8�
--
13
1t
27.00
*
14
12
19
13
52TIIS-- "- 0-27137
-0�6
NTE
- - -
17
14
60.00
•
1e
13
ID'
16��
50.00
THE-VORANS-CLUB
ADVERTMING
23-4214-611-61
20
17
50.00
*
22
19
1D
- - -
23'
u
27
20I
131.5S
*
ze
27
21
20
Z2
�.�
VC/ /
7c--��
Y . V V
�}[ T }fir -rnc
KOU RT fV V AI 1 CON --
—-scow
PRO SER
- - - 6779—
23
900.00
24
3
27
- 05'2TT2 OZ71
1= - FiQECER --EflG
SERV
40 - 4201-800-80
2e
234.76
*
271
35
26
30-4504-78S-76
V4
37
2D
30
- 54.80
*
1 e1
JD
40
L33
149.00
*
50-4202-840-
41
42
43
34
�5271� -��I
AR7GF�ELECTI�I�i.`
P
- - -
0'20
45
3e
275.00
*
46
36
(2 checks)
47
49
77
— 053cTL
�0
COLLEEN �A
ENA WrNTER -CO
- 202 =4B -8
36
052716 02/13/89
50.00
- ^-^''EEN Pfti 06
NEHA DUES
10- 4204- 480 -48
I90
39
00
y,
—
NATL ENV. HEALTH ASSOC.
-
S1AI
921
411
a2
* * * * **
* ** —CKS
54
95
9e
43
2778
D—
PLOTTER
— 2= 2SV --26
827
97
44
052718 02/13/89
1,775.00
COMPUTERLAND
NEW COMPUTER
10- 4902 - 260 -26
8279
6B
49
0527_18 02/13/89
4,790.00
COMPUTERLAND
NEW COMPUTER
10- 4902 - 260 -26
8277
46
6,594.00
61
1
6;11
47
ae
052719 02/13/89
322.50
JERRYS LSCAPE MAINT
SNOW REMOVAL
50 -4248- 841 -84 6438
62
6J�
64
49
e0
51
OS2720_ 02/13/89
J99. 5u
102.50
CCWDC IND INC
STAKES
�—
10- 4604 - 260 -26
8916
69
66
67
e9
92
102.50
*
6D
153
70
94
052721 02/13/89
111.86
LOVEGREEN IND SERV
CONVEYOR REPAIR
50 -4248- 841 -84
71I
7z
99
96
9,
052722 02/13/89
-
285.00
ALICE E HELLAND
AMBULANCE REFUND
10- 3180 - 000 -00
73
74
77
7
r
U
1989 CITY OF EDINA
Il CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT
2
4
1 5
e
.e
Y
u
i.
` 2.
�2,
i.
2:
2.
y 21
3<
31
mu
36
37
36
39
4C
41
42
43
44
45
46
` a7
4e
ae
,_ Sc
51
51
` 53
54
55
�i SE
S7
J
CHECK REGISTER 02 -21 -89 PAGE 2
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. # MESSAGE
4- :. _
285.00 +
;
- - 0527 -a3
—
-0211 / 9
.-
.0-0
400_
-
-Q § TATEFIRE- PROCT---
-C-ONTRA- CT -REPAT
�24�78c'� -T� 831 4 -8791-
400.00 +
--V27T37W
4J3. 00
AMALEY -P
LNtlNW
39---4S-"--T8T=-M-l226 4- 9161 --
493.00 *
0 /13/89
- 5S.27
-Hol Eg- -Cu—
--GENMAL SUP
- 0-�=78� T8 T3 -023- 91 SS--
SS.27 *
- --05272
0v-.-s
Sou RVIEW -REST 5N
rLOUU rKOUrlN%
41-4201-900-90
609.80 *
- Or�7e7--
�27f37iM
- --- W00-
-MT I- ADULT- EXT-------
TYPTNG7CLASS
- - i8 -0--T8- - -
-
69.00 +
6,238.50 *
100.00
PREMIER OUTIYOO "ERV---
Z`ONTRWCT —SEW
J0-4E88— SE-78— 9086 --
100.00 *
s2r30
-
30-4504- - 718 So I I usel
052730
02/13/89
216.11
E -Z SHARP
GEN SUPPLYS
30-4504 - 782 -78 5545 8508
321.34 *
OS2731
02/13/89
107.95
INTER CONF OF BLDG
BOOKS
10 -4502- 490 -49
107.95 *
052732
02/13/89
3,650.00
ROSE BURNS CATERING
FOOD CWC PARTY
10- 4206 - 500 -50 1415 9084
3,650.00 *
OS2733
02/13/89
147.48
FIDELITY PROD CO
OFFICE SUPPLYS
30 -4516- 781 -78 535904 9003
147.48 +
052734
02/13/89
375.00
MKTG FACTORS INC
PRO SERV
50- 4201 - 820 -82
052734
02/13/89
375.00
MKTG FACTORS INC
PRO SERVICE
SO -4201- 840 -84
75 00—
1,12S.00 *
FiKTL�FIC
50-4E01-0bU-db
SHADAWN FENCE CO.
- ubd rib
vEZT3789
9
--- --- -- -__
=6
10-4901-6SO-64 9053
052735
02/13/89
21.00
DEBBIE BILLION
REFUND
30 -3512- 000 -00
-444"0 *
(2 Checks)
052736
02/13/89
499.98
CREATIVE VISUALS INC
ADVERTISING
30- 4214 - 781 -78 91101
499.98 *
052737
02/13/89
19.50
DEPT OF PROPERTY TAX
POSTAGE
10 -4290- 140 -14
19.50 *
* * * -CKS
02713789-
IE1780
MIDWAY -IND- SUPPLY
-K T -RE Ar K
10-45 04 S4D= S4--84618 -876
052739-
52739
02/13/89
59.90
MIDWAY IND SUPPLY
KIT REPAIR
10- 4580 - 301 -30 89128 8768
4- :. _
1989 Cl
F EDINA
CHECK R! 'ER 02 -21 -89
E 3
CHECK NO.
DATE AMOUNT
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. M
MESSAGE
z
181.70 *
2
4� ". "052740 -
-�c�7i
TECHNODATR -- -
---- -FAX -MACHI E
- iII= fi�5= 0II0 =00-
2033 --
8811 - 3333
-- - i;
s 052740
02/13/89
699.33
TECHNODATA
FAX MACHINE
10 -4901- 260 -26
2033
8811
ie
8 052740
02/13/89
699.38
TECHNODATA
FAX MACHINE
10- 4901 - 420 -42
2033
8811
i'
e
7 -- 052740-
699:- 33
TECNNODATA --BAR--
FIACRINE
T- 0--496t= 420= 42--2II33-
881 3133
9
a 052740
02/13/89
699.38-
TECHNODATA
FAX MACHINE
10- 4901- 420 -42
2033
8811
"
2,098.00
„ 052741
02/13/89
3,795.00
ROY A ANDERSON
PRO SERVICES
60- 1300 - 005 -20
"
rz�
3,795.00 *--
3333-
052742
---
02/13/89
-
188.00
- -- - --- 3333-
UHL CO INC
--' --
CALIBRATE
10- 4504 - 540 -54
54559
--
8131
,.
"
e
188.00 *
,1
21
,7 052743
02/13/89
279.62
PLAANT EQUIP INC
BUTTERFLY VALVE
40 -4540- 801 -80
11336
6652
2:
e 052743
02/13/89
61.44
PLAANT EQUIP INC
HAND WHEEL
40-4540- 801 -80
11335
6671
2.
2.
_
20
2'
21 652744
02/1 33/89
248.04
GREENHAVEN PRINTING
PADS
10- 4504- 560 -56
100985
8347
12.
21
zz
021 13%89 --`
2dR.."04= -
GREENHAVEN PRINT
8347 3333-
Iz
23 052744
02/13/89
248.04
GREENHAVEN PRINTING
PADS
10 -4504- 560 -56
8347
24
248.04 *
3
9.
24
2e 052745
27
02/13/89
102.20
102.20 *
--
MEL SATTER
-
TAPE
40- 4540 - 801 -80
39679
9031
3,
3
3'
28
3'
29 052746
02/13/89
13.50
SCHULTE- SCHLAGBAUM
GEN SUPPLYS
30- 4504 - 782 -78
9080
3'
3n
13.50 *
3'
3,
321 052747
02/13/89
100.00
PAT GREEK
OPENING FEE
30- 3501 - 000 -00
4
4.
33
100.00 *
4
34
„ 052748
02/13/89
117.00
MARIAN ALSTAD
COMMISSION
30- 3501 - 000 -00
14
4'
36
117.00 *
I41
37
38 052749
02/13/89
100.00-
CURTIS HEAAD
PERFORMANCE
30-4224 - 781 -78
4!
3i
]9
100.00 *
e
40
41 052750
02/13/89
75.00
LYNNY PETERSON
PERFORMANCE
30- 4224 - 781 -78
i3:
e'
42
75.00 *
of
43
44 052751
02/13/89
100.00
MARIA GENNE
PERFORMANCE
30- 4224 - 781 -78
5'.
'51
45
100.00 *
i„
a,
47 052752
02/13/89
200.48
AUTO CONTROLS INC
PARTS AND LABOR
40- 4540 - 801 -80
189169
8974
18:
48
200.48 *
6",
J90, 052753
02/13/89
291.16
ECONOMY SYSTEM INC
PARTS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
59693
8598
Is
8_
291.16 *
52'
'.3 052754
02/13/89
21.33
STEVE JOHNSON
SCHOOL
10- 4202 - 281 -28
'(
541
21.33 *
'
7:
95
88 052755
02/13/89
33.45
NATL INFOR DATA CTR
ZIP CODE BOOK
-
30-4516 - 781 -78
7:
7•.
37
-- 3333-
__.�
s
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
02-21-89 PAGE 4
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
0527S6
02/13/89
333.67
us Qn-r-comm—_
-REPAIR-
"-;248-_803_-zUG__A68279 8994
5
14
57.36
7
4.00
22
27
121!
'
3S'oo
30
3S.00
'42
331
44
554.53
461
3,
11560.00
_
Al
270. 00
4
44!
i0o.00
Z13
480.00 *
117
-'
67
-nSerr2 ____
7o2 /i�
Tasco
rTr-a*sezpF---------aupp���---------�-----To=4su*=neo=4e----
- --
°|
53
189.00 *
=/
"
'-osaTT3------oarv�roy
-------ART
'uonK- SOLD ----------�s�3ses=nun�no-----�----
- ------
`^|
�ea-------apsczAc-sFrsnTn-
-|�
saoe *
,.
~
-
'--
-_ -
,
•r
tir
v
•v
ar
Y '�►'
E
qr
4&
40
qv
r
r
1969 C. JF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT
CHECK R, fER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
V
02 -21 -89 E 5
ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE
2 2
2
3 0
052774 0
02/14/89 1
113.20 E
EDINA FOUNDATION A
ART WORK S
SOLD 2
23 -3625- 000 -00 1
13
4 _
_ .
.1.3_2 -
- - - - -
- -- -
- -- -5
s i
e 0
052775 0
02/14/89 7
73.50 N
NAN GRIMSBEY A
ART WORK S
SOLD 2
23 -3625- 000 -00 7
ie
-- -
- - -- -
-- -
--- -- -
- -
- -
-- �o
6 h
052776 0
02/14/89 4
49.00 D
DOROTHY HALL A
ART WORK S
SOLD 2
23- 3625- 000 -00 ,
ho
10 -
- -�9 -0V '
'� .
. - - -
- - -- -
-- -- —
——`—'— - -IfB
11 1
052777 0
02/14/89 1
102.20 J
JEAN HAEFELE A
ART WORK S
SOLD 2
23 -3625- 000 -00 "
"
131 - -
- -_ -
-- 1
-- �� -�' -sue _ ,
171
14. ,
052778 0
02/14/89 2
28.00 O
OBERON LESLIE A
ART WORK S
SOLD 2
23 -3625- 000 -00 '
'oI
- - -
- - -- -
- - - -
-- -28 -00 w
- -
- - -- -- — - - - - - -- - - - -
-- - -- -
- -
- - - 211
° -
w -
17 2
OS2779 0
02/14/89 2
222.60 C
CY TURNBLADH A
ART WORK S
SOLD 2
23 -3625- 000 -00 2
22
2�I
20) 2
052780 0
02/14/89 2
22.40 R
ROXANNE SORENSON A
ART WORK S
SOLD 2
23- 3625- 000 -00 2
271
zz - -- -
- -- - -
- - - - - - -- -
- -- X2.40
30
23 3
052781 0
02/14/89 4
49.00 S
SANDRA D SHAUGHNESSY ART WORK S
SOLD 2
23- 3625- 000 -00 1
1
2s 4
49.00 w
w 3
33
26 3
052782 0
02/14/89 3
31.50 B
BETTY PEDDIE A
ART WORK S
SOLD 2
23 -3625- 000 -00 3
34
20 3
052783 0
02/14/89 1
161.00 S
SHARON McKISSON A
ART WORK S
SOLD 2
23- 3625- 000 -00 3
36
31 - 1
1-- 0-.� —
T
—__. 4
40
32 V
052784 0
02/14/89 2
25.38 A
ANN WIDERSTROM A
ART WORK S
SOLD 2
23-3625- 000 -00 4
4
34 -- -
-- - - -- —
— - -- 2
25.- 36 -
- - -- --- -
-- - - -- --- -- —
— - -- -
- -- l
3s 4
461
31 O
OS278S 0
02/14/89 3
309.95 S
SEARS U
UNIFORMS 1
10 -4266- 430 -42 4
47
4e
37 =
= T
T 4
4fl
38 S
052786 0
02/14/89 2
295.76 M
MOLLIE PAULSON A
ART WORK S
SOLD 2
23 -3625- 000 -00 "
SO
40' 0
052786 0
02/14/89 -
- 136: -33 -
-- -
- fMOCLiE— PAUL2ON „
„
a, 4
432.09 w
w e
e4
a2 �
�4-� a �
��t
is
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK
REGISTER
02-21-89 PAGE 6
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
3
OS2792
02/14/89
576.88
NANCY KNUDSON
SERVICES
28-4201-701-70
as
4
OS27 9402/14/89
76.32
EDWARD LANCELLO
MILEAGE
10-4208-390-30
.
05279S
02/14/89
253.50
GOPHER CASH REG
REGISTER PAPERE
e7-4SI6-667-66 8740 9261
In
0'2796
02/14/89
7.18
SOLVEI SWENSON
MILEAGE
10
1�1
OS2797
02/14/89
33.33
NARCOFFICER
ADVERTISING
SO-4214-822-82
24
OS2797
02/14/89
33.34
NARCOFFICER
ADVERTISING
50-4el4-862-86
"s,
OS2798
02/14/89
21.66 16.66
MN AMVETS NEWS
ADVERTISING
50
j-41
OS2799
02/14/S9
16.68
MN AMVETS NEWS
ADVERTISING
50-4214-842-84
55.00* 59.90
341
32,
SO.00
200. 00
54
41
200.00
50
47
iso.00
02
ISP31
150.00
~
,
W
I
f`
r
r
r
r
r
C `
Y
v
+r
411
4s
j 1969 C1 iF EDINA CHECK R1 ;ER 02 -21 -89 E 7
1 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. 11 MESSAGE
2 2
3 052809 02/14/89 65.28 MERWYN WALKER MILEAGE 27 -2010- 000 -00 '
4 b5 - �$ - -+� ------ - - - - -- e
5 e
c 052810 02/14/89 12.00 PAT BIERSDORF REFUND 30 -3512- 000 -00 7
_ e
7 — -- la.ou O
e 1O
° 852811 02/14/89 380.00 BRAGER INC GEN SUPPLYS 30- 4504 - 782 -78 22867 8944 1
1II 14
12, 052812 02/14/89 59.90 GROTH MUSIC MUSIC SHEETS 10 -4596- 627 -62 9266 ,e
a -------- - - - - -- '� 9 �0 k - -- - -- - - - - -- — - - -- -- -- - -- - i 7
,4 1e
052813 02/14/89 48.08 TANDY CRAFT SUPPLYS 10- 4504 - 627 -62 8734 1°
5 -- --- - -- -— — - - — - ------------ ----- - - - - -- - - - -' -- - -` - -- 20
,e 48.08 w -- - - 21
f7 22
s 052814 02/14/89 31.53 LUCILLE M JENSEN AMBULANCE 10- 3180- 000 -00 23
z4
20 25
21. 052815 02/14/89 235.00 JANET McEACHRON AMBULANCE 10- 3180 - 000 -00 27
��------ --- - - - - -- -- te
25.0— — -- — —_ - -_ —_ —r
23 31
24 052816 02/14/89 323.61 ORR SAFETY CO SCOTT REPAIR PART 10-4540- 440 -44 8835
_ 3
26 34
052817 02/14/89 1,102.64 YORK INTERN CORP PROF SERVICE 30- 4201 - 782 -78 56219 9245 971
v
ie ----- --- - - - - -- — 1,102.84 � ----- --- - - - - -- — - - -- - ---- - -- 3n
37
29 3e
30 052818 02/14/89 821.8'10- GOVT TRAIN SERV SEMINAR 10 -4202- 440 -44 5416 8954
31 8 V 4,
32 4 ?-
33 052819 02/14/89 267.00_ JO RUTH OFFICE ADM 23 -4120- 611 -61 431
35 46
36 * * * * »* **e' -CKS ae
37 — — — 49
38 OS2A19 02/07/89 207.30 ADVON UNIFORMS 30- 4262- 782 -78 882727 9078 50
33 207.30 *
52I
40 e3
41 * ** —CKS 54
42 56'
113 O5 0 027 -4-6 0 ALFON[87ANDERS ON - - -- BEER - LINES- 2T =4- 630= G63=Ta 57I
44 14.00 * ISe
45 601
46 61
472
46 052A39 02/07/89 44.40 ALTERNATOR REBUILD BATTERRY 10- 4504 - 440 -44 1630 8873 631
49 1.sv. bo --ALTERNATDR-- REBUILD!— SAFETY -G - - 32-- X1027- - 051
50 183.90 * ee
e71
IS] 701
54 OS2A43 02/14/89 195.80 AMER LASER -CUT GRA GEN SUPPLYS 28 -4504- 702 -70 63735 9000 71
_n_
55 * 73
58 74
57 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 771
41
41
1989 CITY OF EDINA
C:HQ-CK NO. DATE AMOUNT
VENDOR
CHECK REGISTER
ITEM DESCRIPTION
02 -21 -89 PAGE 8
ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. # MESSAGE
3
el
Ir
,2!
* ** =CKS .._ -17
fr
,,l
1`'o
2'vi
* ** -CKS '2,
271
2L,
3.
�I
�3 ^I
I
F
ool
140,
142
*** -CKS -- 11
a ^I
** *-CKS
ryr
r.
s '
9 ^'
C2I
o•,I
* *� =CKS asp
67f
- "r.
* ** -CKS
I3
OS2A49
02/07/89
85.72
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
10 -4262- 440 -44
OS, 2A49
02/07i89 --
_ 14.38
AMERICAN LINEN
- LAUNDRY..-_._-- .-._-_-
- -10 =4262- 520 =52
-
,is
OSEA49
02/07/89
127.94
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
10 -4262- 520 -S2
a
OS2A49
02/13/89
10.43
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
10- 4262 - 625 -62
Isl
d52A4zf---
d�707789-
34 $d
AMERICAN- LINEN -- -
"- - -" "LAUNDRY -
0 =262= 782 -78 "-
- " - - --
052A49
02/07/89
60.20
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
SO- 4262 - 821 -82
OS2A49
02/07/69
96.32
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
50 -4262- 861 -86
S2A49
02/071`89- .--- - -
_
" - -- - - - -_ -- 40.70-_- _.._-
------- AMERICAN-LINEN _. ___-
_.- - - - - -- LAUNDRY-- - - - - --
--
I+cr
++
570.49 #
I,4;
OS2A67
02/0$/69
4.99
AQUA ENGINEERING
PARTS
10- 4504 - 318 -30
20414
7309
I7
052AG7 --
02%10/89 -
-- 9 :72__ --
AQUA ENGINEERING
REPAIRS -_' -- --�—"
—G6=- -1300= 044 " =08
20369 ---
Os2A67
02/10/89
198.49
AQUA ENGINEERING
REPAIRS
60- 1300 - 044 -08
20370
I13�
- --
299.20 #
_
- 052A76
--
- - - -- --
WP COEFEE_.C.Q._ -_
- --
-OF -GOODS i
7
6521 =i
O 7d7r8ii
X2.80
BST
28_-,4"624� T03 =70-
"27292 -
-- 9018 -_
121
82.80 #
�"
- 052980
-- 02TOT/59—
- -TO 32
- ASTLEFORD -INTL
VALVE
=- 4S4�S6II= S6-S1884
-9045
2FI
10.32
I
052A85
02/13/89
393.85
AUDIO VISUAL WHSE
GEN SUPPLYS
30- 4504 - 782 -78
17286
9252
----
.. 3 ^I
052605
02/14/89
52.98
BACH -BILL
REIMBURSEMENT
30- 4516 - 781 -78
52.98
fig'
05281 "-
- S2/07/8h -
-- 2440 - - --
BATTERY WAREHOUSE-
- - - - -- DUEL TERMTNAI:'---
f0= 4540 = 560 =56-
20877 -
8763"
ten,
052818
02/14/89
647.64
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
BATTERY
10 -4540- 560 -56
22214
8857
142
052818
02/14/89
881.27-
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
CREDIT
10- 4540- S60 -S6
22260
1431---
43 --
- 052E 18--
_0271 4789 - -
- - - -- -374 -1 0"
— BATTERY- WAREHOUSE- -
- - - -- BATTERY - - - --
t04540-S60-S6-21842--8857-
052818
02/07/89
249.40
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
DUEL TERMINAL
10 -4540- 560 -S6
21522
8843
052818
02/07/89
219.30
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
SEALED BEAM
10 -4540- 560 -56
15535
8548
OS2EiLs --
- 02 /07 %S9 - -`
-- — 147._84 _ - --
BATTERY - WAREHOUSE --
- - - - -- PARTS --- _"
-1-0= 454"0_ = - 560 -S6
21850 -
8522"
47
11006.41
.o
052822
02/14/89
17.10
BEER WHOLESALERS
BEER
27- 4630 - 663 -66
85282C
fib /i3O /89 --
- - " - -- 96&:45 --
-- BEER WHOLESALERS
- -BEER
X1,31
052622
02/08/89
2,371.35
BEER WHOLESALERS
BEER
SO- 4630 - 842 -84
052822
02/10/89
1,766.80
BEER WHOLESALERS
BEER
50-4630 - 862 -86
I
3
el
Ir
,2!
* ** =CKS .._ -17
fr
,,l
1`'o
2'vi
* ** -CKS '2,
271
2L,
3.
�I
�3 ^I
I
F
ool
140,
142
*** -CKS -- 11
a ^I
** *-CKS
ryr
r.
s '
9 ^'
C2I
o•,I
* *� =CKS asp
67f
- "r.
* ** -CKS
jy'IF1 F EDINA
NO. DATE AMOUNT
lw
CHECK RI 'ER 02 -21 -89 c 9
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE f
2
3
052B25
02/07/89_
100.00
BENNETT -WAYNE
POLICE SERVICES—
10 =4100- 430 -42
_
- --
_
—
_—
- -_
**o-CKS
0
052B27
02/14/89
132.50
BERGFORD TRUCKING
DELIVERY
50- 4626 - 822 -82
0
052B27
02/14/89
236.00
BERGFORD TRUCKING
DELIVERY
50- 4626- 842 -84
;
BERGFORb TRUCKING- '-------
DECIVERI( - --
567.50 *
I'
1I
121
I
'
--
—
- --
- -- - - --
—
,a!
OSEB30
02/08/89
56.43
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GEN SUPPLYS
10 -2010- 000 -00
428165
'
io
052B30
02%03/89
19.95-
_
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
CREDIT - —
f�- 201 -6= 000 =00
-- --
,7
052B30
02/14/89
31.55
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GEN SUPPLYS
10- 4504 - 510 -51
443401
I:
,a
052B30
02/08/89
160.87
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GEN SUPPLYS
10 -4504- 510 -51
439510
I;
s
5283 --
0- 27 -0878T----
70.SO-
BERTEL301�FBR02 -- INC -
CRE6I
X504=- 5f0 - -S
--
—
20
052B30
02/08/89
68.29
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GEN SUPPLYS
10 -4504- 510 -51
441748
I'
21
052B30
02/07/89
60.80
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
LIFT OFF
10 -4504- 540 -54
437517
8679
22
052630
_
02%07%89 —
38.93
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
__ - SUPPLYS -
—F0 =4504= 560 =56
438659--
8783 --
13
052830
02/10/89
119.96
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE MISC
10 -4516- 440 -44
442172
8905
24'
052830
02/10/89
3.09
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
INDEXES
10- 4516 - 440 -44
442172
8905
zn
-52B30
___0227087S9_
0-0—
BERTELSON-BROS--INC---
"CHAIR
10--46"= 26-0=26-440290E-8947
ze
052B30
02/13/89
42.40
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLYS
30 -4516- 781 -78
443990
9253
27
052830
02/10/89
107.37
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLYS
30- 4516 - 781 -78
441738
9183
ao
_
052830
02%14%89
330.34
__
BERTELSON -S_. INC
-_. GE4_ SUPPLYS --
40= 450��00 =8 -0
X43396
-- -
29
30
1,159.28
32
33
052832
02/07/89
72.00
BEST LOCKING_ SYSTEMS
CORES LOCKS
10- 4504 - 646 -64
89105
8840
'34
052832
02%08%89
6.G6
BEST LOCK ING3`YSTEFI�
—KEY$—
T0_-;_450A= G4Ta =S4'-
89108 --
-9118
-- - -'
35
052B32
02/08/89
19.19
BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS
KEYS
10- 4504 - 646 -64
89107
9118
35
05^cB32
02/13/89
80.09
BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS
KEYS
10- 4504 - 646 -64
89333
9255
I'
3,
052632 - - c'rT07789 --
—i�f :25
BEST- LOCKIN9-- SYSTEMS
SET$
0- 4540 = 520 2-
891 -06
842
301
052832
02/07/89
50.69
BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS
GEN SUPPLYS
28 -4504- 702 -70
88829
8034
I39I
052832
02/07/89
1,352.43
BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS
- - --
KEYS
40- 4540 - 802 -80
89104
8785
--
40
- - - --
—`—
11690.25
I'
41
142
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
44
052842
02/14/89
8.35
BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY
PHOTOS
10- 4508 - 440 -44
849226
45
052B42
02/08_/89
43.35
BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY
OFFICE SUPPLYS
30- 4516 - 781 -78
892895
9069
45 - --
05'3c fd4C
0-2�4%8�5
- _T7. fs
BL-A CK�HOTO-GR-APHY___
OFFTC- CE- SUPPLI -ES—��
4517-- 78-T--7S
-9V4-4
9264 -
-- --
4,
4a
68.85
I'
If
49
Ir
30
0,
05_2877
02/10/89
96.00
BRAUN ENG TESTNG INC
BLDG
27- 1300 - 001 -00
14814,
,
z
i67 00 *
-
--
— -
—
'54l
r 56
OS2878
02/08/89
51.21
BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC
MAT
10- 4512 - 520 -52
114783
8712
i
,.,(
0* =Mw*
* ** -CKS
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
02 -21 -89
PAGE 10
CHECK,NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. # MESSAGE
J
3;
052C01 -
02/10/89
8.73
C S DISTRIBUTING
CRAFT SUPPLYS
23 -4588- 611 -61
081696
8801
3I
.4
n I
_
-
-- - ___1 18.73 *
- - - - -
- -- - -- -- -- -_ -
- -- - -._ ... - -- -
�
,.
052002
02/10/89
2.05
C. F. ANDERSON
:.
FIGHT CHARGES
10 -4248- 440 -44
71
-
- --
2 0 b *
- .. -- - - -- - -- -- -.. -
- - -- - - -- - --
-- -
-- -
- - -- -
-
* ** -CKS
°+y
052007
02/13/89
776.42
CARGILL INC.
SALT
10- 4538 - 318 -30
605690
7438
14
052C07
022/13/89
770.61
CARGILL INC.
SALT
10- 4538 - 318 -30
605684
7438
is "l
.;I
-
ql
--------------------
-
- - --1 , 503 *
----- -- - - - - -- --- -- -
- -- - -
-
- -
-- -- - - -
- -- - �17
15
7
* *:r * **
---
- - - - --
* ** -CKS
its
el
I17I
052C10
02/07/89
216.92
CARLSON STORE FIX CO
GEN SUPPLYS
30- 4504 - 782 -78
28765
9112
z'
�e
-
-,
--
- - -' - --
216.92
--
--
-C4,
I2.
- - --
-
-- — "- -
-
251
* * ** *
* ** -CKS
-I
+' --
'.T
052030
82lb6 %89- - - -
-- -- --- -- _
T14.35 - --
----- -
- CITY BEER
-- -za
BEEF - - --
-50= 4630= 822 =82
- -- --
- -- - --
zrl
_I_,1
052030
02/08/89
186.55
CITY BEER
BEER
50- 4630- 842 -84
I'41
052C30
022/10/89
196.40
CITY BEER
BEER
50- 4630 - 862 -86
-.
— 497.- 3�,F --
_-
-
-
- --------
--3.I
eFl
134
* ** -CKS
- 13fi1
:
+)
05X36
02/08/89
36.75
CITY WIDE SERVICES
WINDOW CLEANING
50- 4248 - 841 -84
- - - - - --
36.75_*
- -
- - --
131
- - - - - --
— -
-- -
- - --
4 Il
X37
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
4i
33
142 '
a
05zG3i5
021f -4h3�i
-_- -421 - 06 - - -
-- OCEAN =FCO -CAB
- CJATER TitEATMENT-
-- TD= 42b�f=35B -3Q
4769' -
9248-
-- -
- -" 4,1
421.00 *
40
4Jl
052C44
02/08/89
200.95
COCA COLA BOTTLING
MIX
50- 4632 - 822 -82
°
t
- -
b5zC4a -- -
- 02107 /$g
- -
731-- 48-- - - -
- -- COCA -ZOLA BOTTLING - - -
-- MIX---- � - - - --
_ -'S "0= 4632 = 842 =84
- - --
-
-- - - --- - - ---
-- 3;
41
05X44
02/08/89
705.75
COCA COLA BOTTLING
MIX
50-4632 - 862 -86
54•
1,638.18
56�
* ** -CKS
5n
- --
- - -" - --
-
0�
J
Osac64 -
-- e/ 1 ___-
- - -�
CONT= MINNESOTA
- CLEANING -_, -- -
_27 4612 663 -66
- -.
-6
:7I
052C64
02/10/89
590.88
CONT - MINNESOTA
FOODSTUFF
27- 4624 - 663 -66
.02
'r
775.64 *
�an
** *-CKS
s+
521.
�-
8��C7t� ---
--
- -Tiei 68 /gT
-'- �-
za :T6 - -- -
-- --
- -- CRESCENT ELECTRIC
-- - -
PARTS-
-- - - -
TO- 4540 -44 (- 44
043320--8671
In �
�•,'
-3
24.76 *
7C'
71.
4
5 :.::
I
* * *r*
- --
- --
- - - - -- - - - -- - - -
-- - - - - --
--
* * *=
LLJ
F%
v
v
v
:%p
W `
b
b
r
b
b
r
r
1989 C, iF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT
CHECK R, fER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
02 -21 -89 E 11
ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. N MESSAGE
2
23S.81 *
12
3
4 --
* * * * *s* -
- -- — - --
--
-- - - -- - - --
— - - --
— —
- --
ssi_CKS - s
e
5
e
OS2C:SS
02/10/89
22.70
CULLIGAN
CULLIGAN SERVICE
10- 4200 - 482 -48
e
�9
"
e
0
ww *w *»
www -CKS ;
:O+
OS2CS7
02/10/89
24.79
CURTIN MATHESON SCI
LAB SUPPLYS
10 -4SO4- 482 -48
270243
8369
(+
12
OS2C87
02/07/89
4S9.20
CURTIN MATHESON SCI
LAB SUPPLYS
10- 4504 - 482 -48
8912
('
ii - - --
052(:87---
-02-/13783
- 3b- 99----
CURTIFI- MATHESON- "SCI -
- - -'- RUBBER - STOPPERS-
0--4504= 8II5 =80
8982 -
-�1
141
520.98 w
'
1
15
—
2
- —
- -- - -
--
- - - -- - --
W CKS 'z
lel
0520:89
02/07/89
33.04
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO__
POINT SET
10- 4540 - 560 -56
35298
8876
IZ
21
*w *w*
www -CKS IZ
22
23
052(92
02/07/89
26.70
CUSTOM FIRE APP
BUMPER
10- 4540- S60 -56
2455
8961
12
24
052C92
02/07/89
72.00
CUSTOM FIRE APP
SET PKGING
10 -4540- 560 -56
002450
8961
13
3
zsL
-05 c
077
.40- CUSTCYM - FIRE -APP
- GRAFML--PKG-ING
13
ze
27
149.10 *
3
133
2.
a
3
29
30
052D1S
02/14/89
78.00
DALCO CORPORATION
CAARPET SWEEPER
27 -4512- 667 -66
234862
9262
3
e
e
4
32
33
wwww **
I
www -CKS °
a
35
OS2D27
02/10/89
30.00
DAVE S FOOD WAGON
DAIRY PROD
27 -4624- 663 -66
8921
e
36
30.00
°
4
37
3e
*www+r�:
4
www -CKS �5
39
40
09/0/59
__
77:56 - --
DAVIDSEN- DIST.- INC.- --
BEER -
15
s
'15
a+
OS2D29
02/07/89
271.50
DAVIDSEN DIST. INC.
BEER
50- 4630- 842 -84
4z
052D29
02/08/89
1S9.00
DAVIDSEN DIST. INC.
BEER
SO -4630- 862 -86
5
�5
5
43
-
56830
_ _
.5
5
'r44
wwm + *IM
www —CKS 16
�45
46
47
052D38
02/14/89
1,650.10
THE DAVEY CO
TREE TRIMMING
60 -1300- 013 -18
°
°
46
11650.10 w
s
49
50
www -CKS °
e
52
05- 'c'D43
02%t�%59
4 , 568 3-
- DECAFIO- EFFICKSON- ARCH--
SERVI-i.`ES —' - --
28--T300=000-00
- -
-
53
54
4, 868.60 w
ie
7
7
55
wwwwww
7
7
S6
157
OS2D4S
02/07/89
47.89
DELEGARD TOOL CO.
CHUCK 74
10 -4580- 560 -S6
4153
8675
7
7.
1989 cIrr or soImx
n*scx nsnzarse 0e-21-89 pAos ie |
«muumT wsmoue zTsm osuuezpTzow AucuumT NO. zwv. w P.O. # msua*us /
°
,.
"
|,
!~�
***-ona
'^
'"|
`"
***-cKa `"
— .20|
=
= |
"'
i
.22
.=�
133
|,a
j |�
-_ __.�~
/=
***-cwo `*
|"
142�
|�
�
-- -__�-�
wj
IC7/ �
^**-cwe-
�.
=.
17�11
-"
41
It
6
OS2D47
02/13/89
16.3S
DEPENDABLE COURIER
DELIVERY
10-4206-120-12
OS2E14
02/07/89
10-9.60
EARL F. ANDERSON
SIGNS
10-4S42-32S-30
SS793 8976
OS2EI4
02/07/89
213.39
EARL F. ANDERSON
SR CENTER
10-4S42-32S-30
8S728 8862
052E17
oe/09/89
2,S96.20
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
BEER
SO-4630-822-82
OS2EI7
02/08/89
9'les.ss
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
BEER
SO-4630-862-86
7;
20,052.8s
4S.76
FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL
BLOOD TEST
10-4201-4eO-42
OS2FI9
02/08/89
1,116.3S
FIRST TRUST
FISCAL AGENT
10-114S-000-00
0932F19
02/08/89
764.12
FIRST TRUST
FISCAL AGENT
10-114S-000-00
441
OS2FI9
02/08/89
41S.41
FIRST TRUST
FISCAL AGENT
41-4298-900-90
11
2,SO3.59
OS2GOI
02/07/69
492.30
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
10-4262-301-30
15,'
,.
°
,.
"
|,
!~�
***-ona
'^
'"|
`"
***-cKa `"
— .20|
=
= |
"'
i
.22
.=�
133
|,a
j |�
-_ __.�~
/=
***-cwo `*
|"
142�
|�
�
-- -__�-�
wj
IC7/ �
^**-cwe-
�.
=.
17�11
-"
IT
r�
y
r..
r
v
v
w.
v
v
�r
r
r
v
v
:E 13
r--
1989 C
--
OF EDINA
--- _ �.
CHECK F .TER 02 -21 -89
CHECK
NO. DATE AMOUNT
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. #
MESSAGE J�
2 052G01
02/07/89
207.44
G 6 K SERVICES
CLEANING SUPPLYS
10 -4512- 540 -54
i2
3 052601
02/07/89
54.69
----
G 8 K SERVICES
-- - - - --
LAUNDRY
-- -
28 -4262- 702 -70
-
—
3
4
-- - -js
_4i- __OS�G��
- O�i87i�9
315��-
G_.8_K__SERVICES
UNIFORMS
3G =d�62= 788 =78 --
9i14
5 052601
02/07/89
260.35
G Q K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
40- 4262- 801 -80
°
e
1,480.75 *
'
e
el www * *w
* ** -CKS °
1 1
°
z
`,3
i9 b����J
V�1V1�6�
_ T7
7V —d3 --
G�ARTNEI�
11
S6.43 +
14
IS
,z
1e
131
14
15 OS2G24
0.2/07/89
19.00
GEN. COMMUNICATIONS
EQ RENTAL
10 -4226- 560 -S6
30319
Ile
1
20 0
�e -- 052624 - --
02110/$1]---- ---
- -- - -- 41 .00- - - --
GEN. -COMMUNICATIONS
`WORK -ON 'GE PORT -- -
- - -10 -4248- 440 =44 -44631
-
_
- - -- -- - - - -- 2-1
17 052G24
02/07/89
266.25
GEN. COMMUNICATIONS
CONTRACT MAINT
10- 4294 - 560 -56
30318
22
0
326.2S *
23' 241
20 w *ww **
* ** -CKS 26
27
21,
22 -- -65��b __
-Gei -i -389 --
- 8dGENER7+�OF�fCE -PRO6
- SUP FLY
�.
23
198.70 *
30
24
31( 3
25
39�
26
z7. 052632
02/07/89
21.58
GENUINE PARTS CO.
KIT
10- 4540 - 560 -56
466837
34
8970 351
-e OS2G32
02%47/89—
4. 9�
_
GENUINE PARTS CO
_ _
—KNOB �
-T0 6'2�5b0= 5ia- 4G673�
3e
8968 — 37
3vl
�3��052633
26 . S6 *
3a
3D'
0'�/1�
2�O�ERESrTIZ—
552.00 *
----
FAYMEN
0= -3ST2- =� - -0—
4 ;I
I4z
32
33
43
94
34
.5
36 052G38
37
02/07/89
100.00
100.00
GEORGE BUTLER
POLICE SERVICES
10-4100 - 430 -42
4a
be
4.
39
39 * *wwwm
_ --
- ---
-- --
- --
- --
w ** -CKS
-- -
30
31I
Sz
40
41 052G42
02/07/89
191.64
GIL HEBARD GUNS
AMMO
29- 4572 - 722 -72
65442
8809
53
54
42 052642
02/14/89
152.40
GIL HEBARD GUNS
PAPER TARGETS
29- 4648 - 722 -72
66447
9009
°9"1
56
43
344. 04--W—
57
45 * *mwww
* ** —CKS
79
160
:'o
47 052GS7
02/07/89
440.00
GOPHER OIL CO.
SOLVENT
10-4SO4- 560 -S6
362329
8877
62
48
440.00
63;
e4
49
50 * * * * *w
--
* ** -CKS
85
6a
e7'
51
z 052GCi8
02/13% 9
_
- -Zi59 � _ GRAYBAR ELECTRIC Cd.
--PARTS -
- -l-0= 4540 = 528 =5
758030-
8698----- - - " —e9
eo
531 052G68
02/13/89
360.36-
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
CREDIT
10- 4540 - 520 -52
770761
8698
70
541 052GG8
02/08/89
111.24
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
PARTS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
768286
8993
7z
7
55 052 -G68
OE7087
AYBAR�LECTR- IC-CO.
-CAB
1 -0= 4540 = 520 =52-
768288
-8990
73
114�
5�052G68
02/08/89
121.18
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
PARTS
10- 4540- S20 -52
762654
8841
57
-
-
-
75;
,
1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER
'mil CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
<-(2� 741.27
I
I,
02 -21 -89 PAGE 14 IP
ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. # MESSAGE -
�11
3
- -- - -- - -- -- * ** =CKS - 3I
P-
61 052GS6 02i07/99 _ 43.76 GRUBER POWER EQUIP AIR OIL FILTERS - 10- 4540- 560 -56 3678 6764 - - 21
e
052G88 02/07/89 — 312. -95- -- GRUBER -- POWER -EQUIP —CHAIN -SAW - - - -- -t-0 901 -= 650 =64- 3686 - -- 8779 - " -- I.
356.71
�31
12,
052H19
02/08/89
1,973.50
HAR NED LUMBER CO.
I „�
- - -- - - -
-- - -- — - -
- - -- T, 973: 5a -- *
--- -- - - - - -- -- --
, _I
X117
052H22
02/07/89
100.00
HAROLD SWANSON
lia
100.00
I
--
211
2"
... - 052145&
�c/07%89-------
- -_. -- 4 -8- :- i�----
HI- RSHFIEC6s -- - - - - --
- 23
L,a
48.10
a,----
•_ 26
�, {,�;;�---
- - -- --
-
-- -- - ---
22
652H65
02/07/89
100.00
HOFFMAN- WILLIAM
IJ0521466
02/10/89
72.00
HOIGAARDS
`I;2.
- --
-
72. 0 - --
-INC.
052I12
02/13/89
253.00
IBM CORP
l i�
2S3.00 �' --
— -- -- --
13 ,
- — - --
- - - - -- - -- -
-- -
- - --
��-
OS2I49 - -
-- 02110%89 __
-- X15- 46 - - --
INMAC -- --
` -'a1
052I49
02/10/89
170.93
INMAC
la2
386.39
tcl
I' 1'
652I59
SYS.- -
-I17I052I59
02/08/89
128.80
INTERIOR COM SYS.
052IS9
02/08/89
51.40
INTERIOR COM SYS.
441
- --
- --
z o
3
052J31
02/13/89
15.59
JERRYS HARDWARE
,.,
052.131
02/13/89
23.89
JERRYS HARDWARE
052731
- -02/f3/84
1- 1. -37--
- JERRYS- HARDWARE - --
�I =•e�
052.731
02/ 13/89
9.95
JERRYS HARDWARE
REPAIR PARTS
POLICE SERVICES
- -- SUPPLYS
POLICE SERVICES
FIRST AID SUPPLYS
MAINT AGREEMENT
.2
* ** -CKS - - 13
,a'
1 0- 4540- 520 -52 35265 - 8535
19
I,°
.21
10- 4100 - 430 -42 22
23
2AI
* ** -CKS 26
27 l
23
3D
32I
- - -* -CKS 33
10 -4100- 430 -42
W
3:1
10 -4510- 440 -44 138845 8262 J°
a3I
4.
* ** -CKS ;43
10- 4288 - 510 -S1 aa'
42
L:oI
* ** -CKS
]1
KEYBOARD -` - -- — - TO �4233= 440= 44 - - -- -- 9082_ — 52
5]
PRINTER STAND 10 -4233- 440 -44 9082 34
,3S
50
* ** -CKS 50'
-
REPAIRS ------ _. - -. - -- 10- 4274 = 420 =42 23138
FAX INSALLATION 10 -4902- 260 -26 23139
TELEPHONE 30-4256- 782 -78 23079 9079 54
P
* ** -CKS a,
MEETING EXP 10- 4206 - 500 -50
GEN SUPPLYS 10 -4504- 260 -26
GEN SUPPLYS -- -1 0= 4504: 322 -30 -- -- _ _ —- - -
GEN SUPPLYS 10 -4504- 420 -42 'O
17,1) 7
- -- - -- - - -. h
LiJ
rl,
V
y.J
.J
v
v
k �
v
v
ti
b
r
v
v
v
19$9 C. JF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT
CHECK R. fER 02 -21 -89 ,E 15
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE
31 '6
sz--- 052�t57- 0��78� �;30b.85 -- RUETHER- DIST-- -Cd - -- —BEE -- 50=6630-= 82f= 82--` -- '.6
83 0S2K57 02/07/89 4,847.46 KUETHER DIST. CO. BEER 50- 4630- 842 -84 "
]
sa 8,154.31 *
ss
S6 * * * * ** * ** -CKS ].
,.
s]I ]
r
T 2 0
052J31 0
02/13/89 4
40.68 J
JERRYS HARDWARE G
GEN SUPPLYS 1
10- 4504 - 440 -44 '
'2
I3 0
052.131 0
02/13/89 7
74.10 J
JERRYS HARDWARE G
GEN SUPPLYS 1
10- 4504 - 470 -47 i
i;
4 0
052.131 -- —
— 02/13/99 - - - -
- -" - - -- 35:98 _-. - -
-- JERRYS HARDWARE -- G
GEN ' SUPPLYS'_ -
- -1 0 =4504= 520 =52- -
s 0
052J31 0
02/13/89 4
43.54 J
JERRYS HARDWARE G
GEN SUPPLYS 1
10- 4504 - 540 -54 °
°
e 0
052J31 0
02/13/89 4
44.98 J
JERRYS HARDWARE G
GEN SUPPLYS 1
10 -4504- 560 -56 '
'
�e
T 0
052J31 - 0277378 'F- 8
87-87— J
JERRYS- HARDWARE - - -"'— `
`GEN -SUP '
'0 504=6 -4b =-64- �
�(o
e 0
052.31 0
02/13/89 2
29.94 J
JERRYS HARDWARE P
PAINT 1
10- 4544 - 646 -64 1
11
052.131 0
02/13/89 3
31.90 J
JERRYS HARDWARE G
GEN SUPPLYS 2
23- 4504 - 611 -61
,� -
-- 052731 ---- 0
02 %1� %89----- -
- -- -� 47 - - -
- - -- JERRYS - HARDWARE - -- - -'___GEN -
- SUPPLYS
- - -
--
1, 0
052.31 0
02/13/89 1
19.05 J
JERRYS HARDWARE G
GEN SUPPLYS 2
27 -4504- 667 -66
,z 0
052•T31 0
02/13/89 2
20.78 J
JERRYS HARDWARE G
GEN SUPPLYS 2
28- 4504 - 702 -70
"I
- 052J31 X2713789 6
64. -78— -
- JERRYS -- HARDWARE - - -" G
GEN- SUPPLYS 6
6= 450* = 782 =78- -
-- i
it
Ia 0
052J31 0
02/13/89 1
125.73 J
JERRYS HARDWARE G
GEN SUPPLYS 4
40 -4504- 801 -80 "
"
Isl 7
784.60 • I
] *
**** e� 1
1r** -CKS !z,
I 2
19
052735-- 2TQ87S9- 2
255 -- J
JERRYS- PRINTING --- �
�R7ATI 0
-- -
- I
. 0
z�l 2
225.75
zl� I
Iz
u �
�t� * +:« -
- -- - -
- - - -- —
—— -- -
- -- — -
-- -
- -- 2
2
23 3
052.774 0
02/13/89 1
179.26 J
JUSTUS LUMBER R
REPAIR PARTS 1
10 -4540- 560 -56 -
--y i2
3
Z]
ze I
2s 0
052K09 0
02/07/89 6
67.17 K
KAMAN BEARING & SPLY C
CHAIN 1
10- 4540 - 560 -56 8
8670 3
I3
130 0
052K09 0
02/07/89 2
2.37 K
KAMAN BEARING 6 SPLY P
PARTS 1
10 -4540- 560 -56 656311 8
8774 1
13
,31 -
** ** *IM l
-' -
--6'9—. S4 III -
-- i
i4
a
34 1
052K23 0
02/07/89 3
374.50 K
KELLY SERVICES P
PT BLDG DEPT 1
10 -4200- 490 -49 l
14
to 374.50 a
la
3] 1
14
30 *
****x1* *
* ** -CKS Is
s
39
--- �52K35 0
02%09 -
--_TT._9_ti R
R1VOX- CUMBER -CO -.- L
LUMBER- _
__1-0= 450325 =38 447S72 -8860 i
ie
1ao -
02/08/89 9
9.99 K
KNOX LUMBER CO. G
GLASS 1
10- 4504 - 646 -64 447483 8
8988 '
'
42 0
052K35 0
02/07/89 9
93.00 K
KNOX LUMBER CO. L
LUMBER 1
10 -4504- 647 -64 445965 8
8983 s
s
a3 0
052K35 627677B9 T
TTT- 9��ZNDR- L
LUMBER -CO -
-LUMBER -
- 540- 52�= 52- ��758�8960 s
s
as 0
052K35 0
02/07/89 1
19.89 K
KNOX LUMBER CO. W
WATER SOFTENER SUPP 2
27- 4504 - 664 -66 447459 9
9073
'
as 0
052K35 0
02/14/89 2
26.76 K
KNOX LUMBER CO. R
REPAIR PARTS 2
27- 4540 - 667 -66 447518 7
7665 '
6'
a6 0
052K35 0
02%08%89 -' -
-639 T
TcFfdXZUMBERZO: G
GEN3`UPPLY 8
8� 4504= 7- 02-- T0- 4�594�c -
-9105 e
e
a] 0
052K35 0
02/07/89 3
33.59 K
KNOX LUMBER CO. P
PARTS 4
40- 4540 - 801 -80 446042 8
8844
40 3
375.86 F
F.
a0 *
**** **
**,P—CKS 6
r
/.
-1|"
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER 02-21-89
PAGE 16
o*sox NO.
o*rE AMOUNT
vsmoom zTsm osaunIpTIow AocuwwT NO. zwv. w P.O. #
msaeAns
]
/.
-1|"
OS2V' 63
02/1*� /89
85.
x- ua-7- o m E—LE-cTR--u- wzCS
AR UNIT
10-4901-420 -42 4e
|
- --'
ee5 � ��--
- - -- ------m-AD'
--------'---------------------
�---
,/
|7
--------------'
------------------------
-----------'
----------
-----
u.|
05eL04 '
0e/07/89
/r*.*o
LA**Sa onRpomATznw
nzmosa
10-*6e0-s60-s6 32e3
,|
!
--------------------------�—
17*.40 *
�----�--
02/08/a9
-------
LYNDALE HARDWARE
GEN SUPPLYS
e8-4SO4-702-70 26S971
8917
i.��
-usacon-----na/nrray--------------�so�nn------'-rnxs'nrATs'sooIp�--------nnn
---
n=nn��n=ssn=ss'4o437
-`.^/
nsaLoa
oe/or/an
180.00
LAKE STATE smuzp.
moo rzw
10-*540-s60-56 48*38
'~
530.00 *
171 j."
****+*
..
,
°
~*r-cxa `
�a
_- -_
9046
/".
***-cxa .°
.,.
oaaa
�.°
-- --`'!
~**-cwa "°
123
',./
|a--osa�an-----oa,00�n ono�ra 8680'------'----'2-1 �
�,o S26. so * �
|27
2.
=
9148 �3�
/~
i-
*p*-Cwa
'�- 31i
3111
.�
~~*-uwS ^~
oyea �6,
***-CKw
OS2L30
02/14/89
389.74
LAYNE MINNESOTA CO.
CHEM FEED PUMP
40-4S40-80S-80 1074
0`52L34
46.45
LEEF BROS. INC.
PRO SERV
23-4201-612-61
15
052L82
02/08/a9
68.16
LYNDALE HARDWARE
GEN SUPPLYS
e8-4SO4-702-70 26S971
8917
-1,J
052L46
02/14/89
74.23
LIEN INFECTION CON
RESTROOM MAINT
27-4288-667-66 16170
13r
101.98 *
|27
2.
=
9148 �3�
/~
i-
*p*-Cwa
'�- 31i
3111
.�
~~*-uwS ^~
oyea �6,
***-CKw
I-
15
052L82
02/08/a9
68.16
LYNDALE HARDWARE
GEN SUPPLYS
e8-4SO4-702-70 26S971
8917
1
68.16
100.00
71
os2mo2
02/07/89
32.78
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC.
3 SPEED SWITCH
10-4S40-S60-S6 91627
8684
I-
I
J
J
J
V
.v
a�
�v
v
v
V
v
v
v
�j 19189 C OF EDINA CHECK F TER 02 -21 -89 :E 17
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR — — ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. M MESSAGE
2 32.78 w 2
4`M11' *wx,�- - - - -- - - - - --- -- -- --- - -- - - - -- -- - -- - - ------ -- - - -- - - -- *sue= CKS - - -`4
9 0
6 052M07 02/08/89 4,337.55 MARK VII SALES BEER 50- 4630 - 822 -82 e
-- 052M8-r--0270778 4T7T -------- FIARK -VII- SALES - - -- BEER 56=4b30-= 842 =84 - 9
6 052M67 02/08/89 8,706.85 MARK VII SALES BEER 50- 4630- 862 -86 10
0 21,789.11 w I"
www -CKS
10 -i1"
3-05zMi 6ST1-47S�892.14 �dOCAREfl DESIGNS PROF - CONTRAOR 4 ]
- - 82= TB- V647Tf- 9265
4I 852.34
15 it
w ** =CKS ,21
7 12.
e 052M19 02/07/89 2,55S.74 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 2'
^0 i2°
21 ww�:www -- .- - - - - -- - -- www -CKS !2,
22 — - - - -- -- -- -- --- - - - - -- — — -z
23- 052M22 02/07/89 476.67 MCNEILUS STEEL PARTS 30 -4504- 782 -78 64525 8855 I;x
24 476.67 w 3'
_ 3;
25 3:
26 wwwwx* www—CKS j3'
3.
26 6�2FI2 -5 �JBi10/ bTi �7�IED�3ZYGEN-- B- �taUIF - - -- AIR -- — 10-4274-440-44 - - -- -�3
2,a 106.27 w 131
30 • I3C
4(
- — - www -CKS .....
4
32 4:
133 OS2M27 02/08/89 4,840..00 MERIT SUPPLY Ti SUPPLYS 10= 4504645_64 20958 8956 - i4.
34 0.,2M27 02/07%89- 495.00 ERl'T -- SUPPLY - -CAR -WASH 0- 4620 -56 56- 20882 - 8778 --
35 052M27 02/07/89 495.00 MERIT SUPPLY WASH WAX 10- 4620- 560 -56 20900 8845 Q
36 052M27 02/07/89 467.50 MERIT SUPPLY DEGREASER 10- 4620- 560 -56 20901 8861 i 4-,
4•
37- 052?'12T- 0F2- /6Ls789 TlF.-30 1°IER- IT- SUPPL -Y— - CLEANING-sUPP 8= 4512 -= 702= 70- 20984 089 i4s
3e 052M27 02/10/89 496.20 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLYS 30 -4504- 782 -78 20983 9092 ,5c
39 052M27 02/07/89 410.08 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLYS 30- 4504 - 782 -TB 20960 9076 91
4° - 0`52M27 - -- 02%1`3 -%$9 434�i� -- - f1ERIT- SUPPLY— - `-CL- EANING- -SUPPLYS`- 30 =4512 = 782= T8- 21'02T- 91 -78 -- i32
41I 052M27 02/13/89 434.36 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLYS 30- 4512- 782 -78 21021 9178 54
42 052M27 02/13/89 434.60- MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLYS 30- 4512 - 782 -78 21021 9178 i5e
-4] - 052M27 - 02707789-- -----t-e7-5O---- MER -IT- SUPPLY -" - -CLEAN -0�F D-4 =8- 02=60- 0926 -898 157
44 052M27 02/07/89 436.40 MERIT SUPPLY PAINT 40 -4504- 803 -80 20920 8847 se
45 8.681.34 w 6° sc
46 -- 61
47 www -CKS X62
63
46 -�j� _per- -�-��-� -- �-���- -/�y�L -- �-- ��- �/� —/f /�-��y� —_ _ 64
9 V�G 8 0 I .5� I -IGI WIC.7TE YVII 1r V1'1� BLDG CH — 095 -000— 65
50 26, 581 .50 w I66
67
91 _ _66
52 052M31 —�2/0 / 6 METR�FONEZaT1M. RENTAL - - 86T---80 -2S64 -- :69
53I 109.60 w '70
71
54
72
55 wwwwww - *ww=CK n,
56 7
57 052M41 02/08/89 22.22- MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO. CREDIT 28 -4624- 703 -70 29192
77 1
?.6f
77 1
?.6f
1919 CITY
OF EDINA �
02 -21 -89
PAGE 18
/
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N
MESSAGE
052M41
02/07/$9
132.80
MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO.
COST OF GOODS
28- 4624 - 703 -70
28747
8730
31
052hi41 .
02/08/89
332.99
MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO.
CONCESSIONS
28 -4624- 703 -70
29094
9005
:3
1
- — - - - - --
- - - - - -- - - -- -
— - - - - -- - -
- -- -- - -- - - -- - - - - - - -- - �----------
- - - - -- - --
- --- - - - ---
- - - --
--
-
, ^
OZe:M44
02/14/89
325.56
MIDWEST CHEM SUPPLY
ROLL TOWEL
10 -4514- 520 -52
23699
8830
-- - _CKS
—
325.56 *
,1
I,i
** rt:e r.
* ** -CKS
14'
OS2M,46 ---
0227T4/a9 - - - --
- - - -1 6 -S0-- -
-- -METZ-- BAKING CO " - -- - --
BREAD -- - -
-- 27 624= GG3 =GG-
--
-- - -
171
OS2M46
02/10/89
43.53
METZ BAKING CO
BREAD ROLLS
27- 4624 - 663 -66
8925
^
OS2M4G
02/14/89
51.00
METZ BAKING CO
CONCESSIONS
28 -4624- 703 -70
1
-
-- - --
- - - - --
- - -— - -- —
-- -
* ** -CKS
21
OS2M54
02/14/89
132.30
MILLER DAVIS CO.
BINDERS
27- 4516 - 661 -66
12923
9107
132.30 *
- - - -- - - - - -- - - -- -
- ---
211
* ** -CKS
3u'
OS2K&3
U2 /08/89 --
T8S -02--
MN- BAR-- - - - - -- —1NIX
S0--4632= 822 =82
--
-
--
31
- -!3,
OSEM63
02/08/89
326.97
MN. BAR
MIX
50- 4632- 842 -84
33
03aMG3
02/10/89
344.53
MN. BAR
MIX
50- 4632 - 862 -86
',FI
• ^�
4
BSS: 52 --W -
-- ----- - - - - -- - -- -- - - - - - -- - - - --
-
-- - - - - -.
-- - -
- - - - -- -- --
37I
* ** -CKS
3B
a,9
i" - --
- --
--
—
-
- --- - - --
- - -
-41I
�-
052MG9
02/10/89
209.65
MCC /MIDWEST
COST OF COMM
23- 4624 - 613 -61
13297
8800
<=
02/07/89
156.23
MN GLOVE
JERSY
40- 4504- 801 -80
28224
8872
!�'I
-r
3a
^''" "" --
v�rrt+rr
052M76
62iO7£9 - - - --
'---- 156-23
`- ii$er�Tiv::cSr MN- GLOVE---
- JERSY KW - --
40= 450-4= 801 =80
28177 --
8872
- - - --
;;SI
y 3.
• 522.:-
312.46*
7
052M73
02/07/89
68.00
MN. ELEVATOR
SERVICE CONTRACT
30- 4288 - 782 -78
10401
9113
311
I«,
-- - --
- - - - -- -------
-as. OO T -
- - - --
7i
e' 91I
3!I
- -- -LEGAL
- -
-
** *-CKS
- -- - - - - --
7't�
052M80
OS2M80
02/08/$9
02/08/$9
30.07
29.32
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
PUB
LEGAL PUB
10- 4210 - 140 -14
10 -4210- 140 -14
70l
79I
-- - --
- - -- -- - - - - --
-_ _- -59-39 *
- -- -- ------- - - - - -- - - -- --
- -- .—
Itll*
_
* * * **
* ** -CKS
P3
052MSS
02/07/89
47.60
MN. WANNER
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
071073
47.60
* ** -CKS
1,(1
7.
al = -I
052NO3-—
G27f4789 --
--- 24D:00-
240.00 +'
--- MPLS -- SEWER - -6- WATER - - - --
STOP -BOX REPAIR --
40=4540= 803 =80-
20754 -
9213
--
-
�7s�
LL
.1
J
J
J
v
R
V
v
'.r
v
v
v
ic389 C OF EDINA
CHECK, NO. DATE AMOUNT
CHECK 1 iTER 02 -21 -89 vE 19 \I`
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 4 P.O. N MESSAGE
'z
3
* + * *4
* ** -CKS 14
4
15
e
052NO7
02/08/89
199.44
MTS NW SOUND
GEN SUPPLYS
30 -4504- 782 -78 72338
9163
e
e
199.44 *
_
* * *r **
* ** -CKS I„
,
-- 652Ni-1_--
b8785 -- -
- -- -- --- -98. -9
- MURRAY SANDLER SUP -
- -- - GEN- SUPPLYS
-�8= 4564= 70 -2-7(F 181 - --
9020 -
- - -- - -- - - -',
„
05eN11
02/07/89
19.90
MURRAY SANDLER SUP
GEN SUPPLYS
30- 4504 - 782 -78 9993
8206
�12
118.70
I,41
-
----- - -- ---
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
2.
e
O Fib-
�2708i8�i-
f-05.-w0
NERCO DI -STRIBUT- ING - - --
-CONCESSION
,]
s
105.00
2
z
-
*CKS -jZ
12
zo
2,
052N68
02/08/89
87.50
NORTHSTAR ICE
MIX
50 -4632- 822 -82
z
22
-- 052NG8
08%07/89 - --
-800
NORTHSTAR- ICE -- -
- -- MIX - ICE-`
:31
052N68
02/08/89
180.00
NORTHSTAR ICE
MIX
50-4632- 862 -86
3
24
445.50 *
-�'
2e
* * * * **
-
3
3
3
27
—28--
- U520i 7
OFI= I -CE -PRObUCTS - --
SERVICE - CONTRACT -f- 0= Ae88= 51a =51 72338
901 i—
3
I3
29
052017
02/13/89
1,151.10
OFFICE PRODUCTS
SERVICE CONTRACT
10- 4288- 510 -51 071765
9012
3
•0
052017
02/13/89
61.50
OFFICE PRODUCTS
COMPUTER SUPPLYS
10 -4504- 440 -44 072558
9083
a
ai
- 052pT7
iDS79879
OFFICE- -PRODUCTS—
--COMPUTER -- SUPPLYS
T1fz4S -TW-S- -= 57070218-
870 r
4
32
052017
02/07/89
38.00
OFFICE PRODUCTS
CCABLE EQUIP
10- 4901 - 160 -16 071846
8411
,4
33
052017
02/07/89,
608.65
OFFICE PRODUCTS
PRINTER NEW
--
10- 4901 - 160 -16 071811
- --
8411
- - - - -- !a
34
---- - -
- - --
-- -_2, 887 .60 -*
-- - - - --
4
4
33
e
*rt * * *w
** *-CKS 4
4
37
3sl
052024
—
02/14/89
980.80
OFFSET PRINTING
PRINTING
10 -4600- 420 -42 29672
8945
4
�s
)fl
980.80
a,
1n2
* *rtrt **
rtrt* -CKS
s
s
3
- -- 05203�Q�Ti67$
S.
t- DUCF._.FOS__.-
-CHP
= -
-6-63
5
�'
44I
38.37 *
e,
4- 4,
* *
e
4]I
PAPER, CALMENSON & CO.
!s
40"
052P05
02/08/89
i50.00
-PAPER _At: -.---
DIRT SHOE RUNNER
10- 4540 - 560 -56 378455
7961
4�
- 0527GS ua/05/8
.60
- PAPER T=aC _T__ = - -'
DIRTSFIOEl2UNNEli
t0�f5�FII= 560 =56- 378455 -7961
�b
so
052P05
02/08/89
150.00-
-PAPER eAL "�T
DIRT SHOE RUNNER
10- 4540 - 560 -56 378455
7961
e
s,
052P05
02/07/89
443.12
— — — --
SNOW PLOW BLADE
10-4620- 560 -56
8762
e.
s2
543-.1
, *
—
--
i�
]i
1431
541
* * * * *rt
* ** -CKS
SG
]'
se
052P11
02/08/89
102.90
PARK NIC MED CTR
PHY EXAM
10 -4212- 510 -51
]
1989 CITY OF EozwA
`
c*c m^Tc Amoumr
102.90 *
'
^ ~
�^r ~~�~�s -- - ---' -- -------- -
`~|"|
VENDOR
CHECK REGISTER
ITEM DESCRIPTION
--- °
02-21-89 PAGE eo |
/
AcuouwT mo� zwv� # P.O. # msoaAus /
�-
�.
---------- ---- - - r~r-uua `|
~~
'.
--
--- ---^|
-
++p-cuu
_
.,.
/
`^
'~
"!
---
----- --
.|`'
,
osapzn __
oe/oo/oy
-lsa sn__
pspmI COLA BOTTLING
_ MIX __________50=4632-082e_8e_
`-| 7
os2p3o
oz/or'ay
*so rs
pspaI COLA oorrLIwo
MIX
so-4632-8*2-8*
!^�
oszpso
o2/on/ny
�aa.yo
pspoz coLw moTn-Iwo
mz�
�n-�are-oma-oa
���!
------------------
'� o�,��p----------------------'
'------'
------------'-��'
/
|
='
.
-�-
~*p-cxa
--_
`n
,
=/
o
~~*-cua
.=1_
|~�
/
.=
/
y'---
'-----
-131
~/
."/'
.
. -
�
�
*r*-oua
�=|
052r76
02/10/89
9ss.*v
PRECISION u,manIvw
sEw wurrL,w
30-=504-783-78
109*32
wv,*
�i
yssso
*
_
/
***-cua
."''
""i
�"
vSur'o ----
W78 9---
."..0-0--
vRINTERS-SERV-'INC------B^""=
="°",=~^"°
=8-°=,`-,"`-,°
"```,
104.00
-
|
�
--~~*-cwa
-
�|
%p
052P80
PRIOR LAKE AGGREGATE
�
6127 -n-
/i
,J
|
- -'----'--
-----------------------'-------'------
- ------'-----------
----------
'---
--
~**-cua
--
cm
-
nseeIo
02/10/89
13e.00
RADIO zwarALLa
nwozwRswTAL
10-*ee6-440-44
13207
�
4
�oe�uo
*
, ,
w3 El
**+***
***-CuS
�7l.
v.
4
J
J
J
eJ
J
ti
V
L.
1589 L' OF EDINA CHECK R TER 02 -21 -89 ,E 21
CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. M P.O. M MESSAGE
f
2
3
052R15
02/13/89
570.53
RAINBOW LEASING
SERVICES
10 -4226- 507 -50
M610SO
e
v**–CKS 17 !a-
7
e
052rt21
02/13/89
732.05
RED WING SHOES
LAUNDRY
10 -4262- 301 -30
°
052R21
02/13/89
251.45
RED WING SHOES
LAUNDRY
10- 4262- 646 -64
97196
2
.c'
052R21
02%13%$9
— 3$4.00
RED 41IN6 3Ht5ES -
LAUNDRY
40- 4'�'b86� =8b
-97196
13(
„
2
1 , 367.50
I1s
_lief
14
15
052R25
02/07/89
380.00
RENTAL EQUIP Br SALES
I SAW
10- 4580 - 644 -64
12922
8770
1DI
16
3$0.03 —*
--
- -- - -
- - -- �z1
2z
7
* ** -CKS 2
19
- —_.—
25
20
OS2R31
02/13/89
23.74
RETAIL DATA SYS MN
OFFICE SUPPLYS
30- 4516 - 782 -78
480113
9250
I26
2 7
21
23.74 *
--
2
* * * * *x
— --
—
- - --
** —CKS
30
31
92
I24
z
052R33
- 0c/08789-
2, 814. GS—
RE3C_ STR - - - --
BEE
0= 630F;;822=82
33
ze
052R33
02/10/89
4,330.55
REX DISTR.
BEER
50- 4630 - 842 -84
37
35
27,
052R33
02/08/89
4,408.65
REX DISTR.
BEER
50 -4630- 862 -86
¢e -
- - --
- - -- - --
- 11,553.85
30
* * * * *x-
* ** –CKS
36
3 9
:0
31
3zl
052R43
02/07/89
90.82
RITEWAY
'
CALIPER
10 -4540- 560 -56
163146
8848
92
44
33
052R43
02/07/89
105.96
RITEWAY
PARTS
10- 4540- S60 -56
162672
8777
341.
46
35
* ** —CKS '471 ts
37
36
—
052R49
02/10/89
35.26
ROAD RESCUE
LENS CAP
10- 4504 - 440 -44
010254
49
5O,
139
052R49
02/10/89
95.00
ROAD RESCUE
FIRST AID SUPPLYS
10 -4510- 440 -44
010339
8909
S1'
40
-- - -----
--
1 l0 . 2G 4
yea
54
42
* * *x: x:*
* ** –CKS 55
�57�
44
052R53
02/14/89
43.20
ROBERT B. HILL
SALT
10- 4504 - 440 -44
02287
se
45
052R53
02/14/89
553.80
ROBERT B. HILL
SALT CHEMICALS
27 -4564- 664 -66
S9'
— 60
46
.
--
997.00 *
EI
62
46
* ** —CKS 63
63
49
50
OS2R77
02/08/89
109.80
ROYAL CROWN BEV.
MIX
50 -4632- 822 -82
85
166
5-
052R77
02/08/89
156.52
ROYAL CROWN BEV.
MIX
50 -4632- 842 -84
.6e
- - -i73
52
-0S2R77
32%1 O /b9 - --
---- 4�0�—
ROY-4i �CR�WN- BEU. - --
—FfIX --
�G32= 8b=8b—
—
5J
507.32 *
i7�
54
72
55
* *
sfi
57
052R79
02/07/89
- 206.25
RTW INC.
FEE FOR SERVICES
10 -4260- 510 -51
— --
74
;5,
19q9 czr, or soIwA
CHECK NO. m^Ts AmoumT
206.25 *
��
ose*nI 02/10/89 188 .98
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
02-21-89 PAGE 22
«cuouwT NO. zmv. w P.O. # msayAos
nmeswoTsIw u Zzpr nowT OF comm 23-46e*-613-61 1e7661 eaos
4,~p-uxa-
'^
.\
'
,*
`|
O52R83
02/08/89
596.07 1,169
RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON
PARTS
10-4S40-S60-S6
8152
596.07* 1,163-17
186.30
1231
OS2S32
02/13/89
S9.80
SOFTWARE FIRST
SOFTWARE
10-4233-440-44
17382 9081
31:
41
OS2S34
02/07/89
65.40
SOUTHDALE FORD
PARTS
10-4S40-S60-S6
198668
.12,
13'
052534
02/07/89
10.24
SOUTHDALE FORD
SWITCH
10-4S40-S60-S6
9529
4-Wlj3Z,l
16"
O52S36
02/08/89
4,544.10
SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO.
BEER
50-4630-822-82
OS2S36
Oe/07/89
81302.10
SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO.
BEER
SO-4630-842-84
os2s.4s
02/13/89
;21.79
ST. PAUL BOOK
MAGNIFIERS
40-4620-803-80
870201 9051
Is 11
052S6 1
02/08/89
5,903.77
STATE TREASURER
SURCHG
10-3095-000-00
�
`
ll
i
P4
1�
i
aJ
V
J
i
1989 C OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT
CHECK I ;TER 02 -21 -89 4;E 23
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE
..3 O52S78 02/07/89 22.51 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP SUPPLYS 40 -2010- 000 -00 8009 31
24 OS2S78 02/07/89 85.75 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP SUPPLYS 40- 2010 - 000 -00 7320 3
3'.
5cS78 - 02707789 ---T50 - 58 SUBURBANi-- PLUMB-SUP — TOOL - 4274 = 903 =B0 8760 13:
26 OS52S78 02/07/89 51.44- SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP CREDIT 40- 4540 - 803 -80 3'
27 052S78 02/07/89_ 275.38 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP PARTS 40 -4540- 804 -80 8858 �3
3
za 052S78 02/07%99 381.08 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP P-ARTS---- ' 46= 454-0--$D5 =80 $$3S la
a 1,008.12 w 31
3, w>rwMwa: -�YIi -CKS
14
32 I4,
33 052592 02/08/89 51.63 SYSTEM SUPPLY COMPUTER PAPER 10 -4504- 510 -51 020188 9110 !;;
4,
3e! ww + *» * - - -- — www -CKS 141
37 4'
3a 052S97 02/08/89 18,168.71 SEH SERTVICES 40- 4201 - 800 -80 5i
39 052597 02/14/89 65_0.19_ SEH ODOR CONTROL SERV 40 -4201- 801 -80 3607 9060 5
51
4,
42 www -CKS 5�
wwww *Ik 51
43 5',
441 052707 02/07/89 86.50 TEAM MARKETING GEN SUPPLYS 30-4504 - 783 -78 2896 9099 151
s+
45 86 . SO w
'61
46 -- -. - -_ - -. 6
47 052TO8 02/08/89 47.97 TARGET SUPPLYS 10- 4504 - 440 -44
4c 052TO8 02/08/89 39.95 TARGET SUPPLYS 10- 4508 - 440 -44 e;
6
49 r .92 w -- -- 6.
61
51 www -CKS 161
113I 052T11 02/07/89 176.45 TESSMAN SEED d CHEM. TOOLS 30- 4580 - 782 -78 10489 9072 !7'
54 OS2T11 02/10/89 40.32 TESSMAN SEED @ CHEM. TOOLS 30- 4580 - 782 -78 10184 8958 !'
55 w �7;
7.
56 7,
www -CK8
70
1
1
P
12� 0
052SG1 0
02/08/89 8
89.50 S
STATE TREASURER S
SUR CHG 1
10-3113- 490 -49 2
2
3 5
5,993.27 w i
i4
www -CKS
6 i
0GAR =
=R OSCOS= FAUSHT— P
PRO - SERV-EN
Q-42OT= 2SV=2S— a
in
6 7
79.76 w c
c
to w
w *,�� ** -
------ - - - -
- -- -- -- --- - -- -
- - --- -
- -
-- w
wrw= CKS -- -„
2 0
052577 0
02/07/89 1
148.00 S
SUBURBAN.CHEVROLET R
REPAIR 1
10 -4248- 560 -56 5
5035
I1
+3 -
- 052577 0
02707789 -
----- TS:-3S -
-- SUBURBAN -- CHEVROLET P
PARTS -- T
T0= 4540= 560 =Sfi- 1
101745— -- I
14 0
052S77 0
02/07/89 2
2.70 S
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET S
SCREW 1
10- 4540- S60 -S6 1
102032 "
"
OS2S77 0
02/07/89
91.71
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET P
PARTS 1
10 -4540- 560 -56 1
101788 X
X11
�15 O
-0 5 --
02/07/89 2
28.94 S
_ 1
-- BOLT - - -- T
T0= 4540-= 56 -G -5b- 1
102098- -
-- _
_- — I2
7 0
052577 0
02/07/89 7
7.61 S
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET P
PUMP 1
10- 4540- S60 -S6 1
101841 2
21
to 0
052S77 0
02/07/89 1
17.59 S
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET P
PUMP WSWA 1
10- 4540 - 560 -56 1
101924 1
12:
_ 1
_- w
w
2!
21 0
058S78 0
02/07/89 1
101.53 S
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP P
PARTS 2
27- 4540 - 664 -66 9
9023 I
I2'
2z —
— 052672- -
- .7 - -
- -" - -
- - - - -- -
GEN-- $UPPL� �
�450T- 70'4 -70- 9
- -- -
91 04 -
- - - -- L
1
1
P
i
CHECK REGISTER 02 -21 -89 PAGE 24
AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE d
11192.58 THE PIRKL ASSOC. 9 HOLE COURSE
1 , 192 .58 * -- - - -- - -
499.82 THOMPSON LUMBER CO. SKYLIGHTS
-- 499.82 - -- -- - - -- -
3,355.80 THOMSEN- NYBECK LEGAL
12,374.31 THOMSEN- NYBECK LEGAL
_ 13,028.85 THORPE DISTR. BEER
13,028.85_ - THORPE DISTR? - - - - -BEER
13,028.85 THORPE DISTR. BEER
13,028.85 *
- 31- -88 --- 'TWIIJ_ITY HOME JUICE-- -MIX --
31.80
164.00 TWIN CITY TESTING REPAIRS
i -64.0 k - - - -- — -- --- -- -- - - - --
41.95 UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORMS
41.95 *
27- 1300 - 003 -00
27 -1300- 001 -00 730412
10- 4201 - 220 -22
10- 4201 - 220 -22
50- 4630 - 860 -86
-- 50 =4630= 860 -86- -
50- 4630 - 862 -86
= 4632= 862 =56-
10- 4604- 260 -26
30- 4262 - 782 -78 9570
* +v-CKS
A
y
,a
t9.
2'6
- 05X714'
* ** -CKS
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
311
CHECK ,NO.
DATE
I!ylnc.
3`c
3_
3 °1
02/08/89
3I
052T19
02/14/89
9100
e.
* * * —cics
af,L
-
--
i..lA----
052T28.
02/07/89
ELECTRIC
CORP
SOCKET
19
8784 e,
o'
a., I
058729
02/07/89
"UNITED-ELECTRIC
052729
02/07/89
-- FREIGHT - CHG
40= 4540 = 801= 80 - -- - -- -
8050------- --R;�
IW4;I
OS2T30
O2 /08/89
1e
052T3U --
- 02/08/89 -
L ail
052730
02/08/89
8874
ia2!
i
L2c
*%k V:XY:k
-02188789 -
n
\�I,n
OS2T91
02/08/89
tin 1 ->a
wl� >I
052008
02/07/89
3 ?�
3ai
u
i
CHECK REGISTER 02 -21 -89 PAGE 24
AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE d
11192.58 THE PIRKL ASSOC. 9 HOLE COURSE
1 , 192 .58 * -- - - -- - -
499.82 THOMPSON LUMBER CO. SKYLIGHTS
-- 499.82 - -- -- - - -- -
3,355.80 THOMSEN- NYBECK LEGAL
12,374.31 THOMSEN- NYBECK LEGAL
_ 13,028.85 THORPE DISTR. BEER
13,028.85_ - THORPE DISTR? - - - - -BEER
13,028.85 THORPE DISTR. BEER
13,028.85 *
- 31- -88 --- 'TWIIJ_ITY HOME JUICE-- -MIX --
31.80
164.00 TWIN CITY TESTING REPAIRS
i -64.0 k - - - -- — -- --- -- -- - - - --
41.95 UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORMS
41.95 *
27- 1300 - 003 -00
27 -1300- 001 -00 730412
10- 4201 - 220 -22
10- 4201 - 220 -22
50- 4630 - 860 -86
-- 50 =4630= 860 -86- -
50- 4630 - 862 -86
= 4632= 862 =56-
10- 4604- 260 -26
30- 4262 - 782 -78 9570
* +v-CKS
A
y
,a
t9.
2'6
nl
- 05X714'
* ** -CKS
2',
zac
27.
- UNITED -"
311
- - -- *** -CKS
1
I!ylnc.
3`c
3_
3 °1
02/08/89
3.
3f
* ** -CKS
3'
9100
e.
* * * —cics
af,L
47
nl
- 05X714'
- -- 02708789 -
-- SS 6G-
- UNITED -"
"ELECTRIC- CORP "-- pi4RT5 - -' - -"
10= 454.0= 520 -52 --
4A
8959--- ---- - - -n�
I!ylnc.
OS22U14
02/08/89
55.67
UNITED
ELECTRIC
CORP
PARTS
10 -4540- 646 -64
8959
052U14
02/08/89
27.2 2
UNITED
ELECTRIC
CORP
SOCKET
29- 4504 - 722 -72
8784 e,
o'
OScU1�T - --
02708/89 - --
- - 9'cS- 80 - - - --
"UNITED-ELECTRIC
-- CORP -
-- FREIGHT - CHG
40= 4540 = 801= 80 - -- - -- -
8050------- --R;�
IW4;I
052U14
02/08/89
22.55
UNITED
ELECTRIC
CORP
PARTS
40 -4540- 802 -80 442100
8874
ia2!
2253.10 *
- -35 -00 - -- UNIVERSITY -OF- MN - - - - SEMINAR
35.00 *
14.10- US WEST COMM.
14 -. T 0- -US -WEST COMM .-
14.10 US WEST COMM.
14.10
* ** -CKS
- r0= 4202 = 440 -44- 442214 - -' - -- - - —
TELEPHONE 23 -4256- 512 -61
- -- - - - - -- TELEPHONE ----- 23= 425G -S12 -G 1- -
TELEPHONE 23- 425G - 612 -61
63
�s
2�
5
rtA•
n4
-- -- * ** -CKS i� ^I
)A
O52U27
02/10/89
♦.fir -,
OS2U27
02/10/89
n�
- -35 -00 - -- UNIVERSITY -OF- MN - - - - SEMINAR
35.00 *
14.10- US WEST COMM.
14 -. T 0- -US -WEST COMM .-
14.10 US WEST COMM.
14.10
* ** -CKS
- r0= 4202 = 440 -44- 442214 - -' - -- - - —
TELEPHONE 23 -4256- 512 -61
- -- - - - - -- TELEPHONE ----- 23= 425G -S12 -G 1- -
TELEPHONE 23- 425G - 612 -61
63
�s
2�
5
rtA•
n4
-- -- * ** -CKS i� ^I
)A
W
'I1 1
I
f-
I
Y I.
i,
J.
`F.
l
i
,1
'I
1989 l
OF EDINA
CHECK
.TER
02 -21 -89 GE 25
CHECK
NO. DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. M MESSAGE
- -- -
2
3
052U30
02/08/89
10.2.00
US WEST PAGING
SERVICE CONTRACT
30- 4288 - 781 -78
9085
4
02.00
» - - -- --
- -- __
o
e
e
9
* » * » »*
» »» -CKS
17
e
i
e
052VO6
02/14/89
105.60
VALLEY PAVING INC
WATER SERV REPAIR
40 -4201- 800 -80
0
9
105.60
'f
to
» »» —CKS
u
,•
+z
13i
- 052V"-
X2107789 —
- VALLEY -- INDUSTRI AL' ._._.
__..__..__CP__ FUEL - -'--
+e
486.86
»
t°
If
1,4
9
'�-
-- f� » *r *:n
- -- - - - -- -
—
- -- - - -- -------------- -
- - - -- _ --
—– ---
- - - - -- - -- - �s» =CKS–
2f
Iz:
,9
052V30
02/14/89
636.60
VANTAGE ELECTRIC
SERVICES
--
30- 4201 - 782 -78
10559 9247
-
I2,
.0
»
2.
zi
z0
2,
» » » » »»
-- - - - -
- -- ---
- - - - -- -- - - --
- -- - - -- -
—
-- » »» -CKS
12�
22
23
OS2V35
02/13/89
14.25
VAUGH DUPLICATION
SUPPLYS CABLE
10- 2149 - 006 -DO
26044
(3
24
14.25
»
3.
ze
» » » » »»
» »» -CKS
a
271
See also 041WO8
3'
31
26
u0a
_
0T'? / m
�6
�1:W:- GRAINGER-------
PARTS - _
0- 454-6 = 440 =4-4—
781
;
z9
OS22W08
022/07/89
55.64
W.W. GRAINGER
RADIO CONTROLS
10 -4540- 540 -54
8340
91
30
179.70
»
31
a
3 1
—
is
Jz
» » » » »»
»» »–CKS
I4.
4n. .
3a3i
��JACTER�OHAgON-
-CE-SERVICES---------TO-4100-
4!
100.00
»
4+
361
4;
41
37
» » »,i »,H
4,
39
5+
39
052W28
02/07/89
19.20
WATER PRODUCTS
HYD GASKET
40 -4540- 803 -80
085735 8065
3
40
154
41
02
» » »%f »»
» »» -CKS
h
SI
43
44
052W35
02/08/89
95.52
WEIGLE –SUE
MILEAGE
10- 4208 - 600 -60
61
45
95.52
»
�«
46
47
49
» » » »»
»» »–CKS
6
Ie'
e:
e.
49
a52 44
-WELD SU PLY U.
AR
- 4bT�5b
847 -8753
e,
901
149.77
»
61
31
o;
6t
2
541
OS2W66
02/07/69
38.56
WILLIAMS STEEL
PAINT
10 -4540- 560 -56
163138
,
ss
8.�
3TJICLIAMS
-3TEE
ART
0-4S-40-SS 0 =5fa
ib21.71
17:
4;i
052WG6
02/07/89
25.92
WILLIAMS STEEL
SOAPSTONE
10- 4610- 560 -56
162469
7'
1,:
W
'I1 1
I
f-
I
Y I.
i,
J.
`F.
l
i
,1
'I
C,
1989 CITY OF EDINA
L
CHECK ,NO . DATE
G
G
L
L
G
�r
.L
G
G
�r
G
L
L
CHECK REGISTER
AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
1�
02 -21 -89 PAGE 26
ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. M MESSAGE
47 6.
I6:
48 R,
491 Ig.
iel
'6.
s, del
32 —_ _— 6•
53 71
7'
54 7:
7:
5
SG ]
37 ,]!
2 0
052W66 0
02/07/89 3
38.56 W
WILLIAMS STEEL P
PAINT 1
10 -4620- 560 -56 163020F2
3 1
184.37 + '
'
e *
* * * * ** *
* ** —CKS e
7
—OSEW 1
16 O
O -
-4 G
GUI ENI 2
2 r-4S'V4--6SB---6S-7234S" 068 0
0
e 1
116.49
- -
-- -
-- ----- -
- - - - -- -
to w
w, *:�+ -
- -
-- *
*+,-CK5 - - -;,:
12, 0
052W92 0
02/07/89 1
100.00 W
WROBLESKI -HENRY P
POLICE SERVICES 1
10- 4100 - 430 -42
113' 1
100.00
14 1
* * * * *+h— -
-- -- -- -- - -
- -- - - -
- -- -- - -- -
- -
- - - - - -- -. *
11
,7 0
052205 0
02/14/89 9
97.15 Z
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE G
GEN SUPPLYS 2
28 -4504- 702 -70 549287 i
i2;
,e 9
97.15 * I
I2;
,2
9 — 2
* * * *y * *
2•
zz - _
_OS Zl -a 0
0-27 07789 I
INC ------KEY���5�6= 5
556 =5bZ, 815 -8977- -
-- iz
x3
10.24 * 1
1'
3
2551 *
*- * =CKB�3:
26I I
052218 -
02/10/89 —
290.00 Z
ZIP PRINTING —
ENEVELOPES -
10 -4516- 510 -51 6573 8906 _
131
e —
- -- -
- 0
— 2
—_ E
- 1
_ 1
29 I
* * * * ** *
* ** -CKS 4,
31 '
'GENERAL FUN -
- 4
32 2
2,280.96 F
FUND 23 TOTAL A
ART CENTER
33I 4
4,296.59 F
FUND 27 TOTAL G
GOLF COURSE FUND !
!4
� a, .
34 i
i'97 -,-63" - - -
-_- FUND- -2B - TOTAL— R
RECREATI "OW CENTER -FIM
33 3
371.26 F
FUND 29 TOTAL G
GUN RANGE FUND .
.4i
36 1
12,525.24 F
FUND 30 TOTAL E
EDINBOROUGH PARK 4
41
a,
37 -
- -
- "fT F
FUNDS "1TTOTAL --- -
- -" UTILITY"- "FUND 1
141
3e 1
11025.21 F
FUND 41 TOTAL S
STORM SEWER UTILITY 1
13,
39 1
100,657.67 1
100,66e.64 - F
FUND 50 TOTAL L
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
s:
40 -
- --- 5
5;73 3 N
ND�O -TOTAL C
CONSTRUCTIDN -FUNTY s
s:
41 5
5
42 4
481,382.38 q
qei,944.48 T
TOTAL 5
5
43 .. -
- - - -.
31
3!
46