The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1989-05-01_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MAY 1, 1989 7:00 P.M. r (Convene Joint HRA /Council Meeting) ROLLCALL I. APPROVAL OF HRA MINUTES OF APRIL 3, 1989 II. EDINBOROUGH - HAWTHORN HOTEL DEVELOPMENT A. Amendment to Final Development.Plan (Council) B. Amendment to Zoning Ordinance - To Allow Hotels as a Principal Use in Mixed Development District (Council) C. Amendment to Redevelopment Agreement - Edinborough (HRA) III. EDINBOROUGH - HOUSING REVENUE BONDS A. Public Hearing (Council) B. Bond Resolution (Council) C. Amendment to Interest Reduction Agreement (HRA) IV. ADJOURNMENT OF HRA EDINA CITY COUNCIL PROCLAMATION - John Moynihan Day May 24 EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION - Neva Williams I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. All agenda items-marked with an asterisk (�) and in bold print are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Set Hearin Date (5/15/89) * 1. Final Development Plan - Super America, 5205 Vernon Avenue - Generally located south of Vernon Avenue, northeast of Link Road III. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS IV. -AWARD OF BIDS A. Grass Fire Fighting Slide -In Unit (Contd from 4/17/89) B. 5000 PSI Stationary Breathing Air Compressor (Contd from 4/17/89) * C. Public Official's Liability Insurance - Council and ERA * D. Police Professional Liability Insurance * E. Tree Removal * F. Stump Removal Agenda Edina City Council May 1, 1989 Page Two V. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A: South Hennepin Human Services Report - Tim Culver, Chair B. Recommendation of Recycling Commission - City -Wide Recycling C. Recommendation - Park Board Minutes of 4/11/89 D. Connor Schmid Petition - France Avenue E. Update - White Oaks Lots F. Solid Waste Legislation G. Confirm Dates - Council Study Sessions * H. Proposed Settlement of 1989 Teamster's Local 320 Contract * I. Set Hearing Date - Vacation of Service Road - Superamerica (5/17/89) VI. INTERGOVERNMENT ACTIVITIES A. Local Government Enabling Statutes - Roseville Citizens Council Legislative Committee . VII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL VIII. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS A. Airport Adequacy Study IX. FINANCE * A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 05/01/89: General•Fund $157,238.20, Art Center $8,579.33, Capital Fund $565.88, Swimming Pool Fund $288.00, Golf Course Fund $37,224.19, Recreation Center Fund $5,542.30, Gun Range Fund $469.96, Edinborough Park $6,935.08, Utility Fund $250,636.86, Liquor Dispensary Fund $9,,041.77, Construction Fund $13,359.00, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $1,372.50, Total $491,253.07 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Mon May 8 Continuation of Board of Review Mon May 15 Regular Council Meeting Wed May 31 AMM Annual Meeting Mon June 5 Regular Council Meeting June 6 - 9 LMC Annual Conference Mon June 19 Regular Council Meeting Mon July 10 Regular Council Meeting Mon July 24 Regular Council Meeting 4 :30 p.m. Council Room 7•:00 p.m. Council Room 7:00 p.m. Council Room Hyatt Regency - Minneapolis 7:00 p.m. Council Room 7:00 p.m. Council Room 7:00 p.m. Council Room MINUTES EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APRIL 3, 1989 Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Richards. MINUTES of the Joint HRA /Council Meeting of March 20, 1989 were approved as submitted by motion of Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Rice. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. HEARING DATE OF 5115189 SET FOR PROPOSED 1989 PROJECT - 50TH & FRANCE Executive Director Gordon Hughes recalled that on March 21, 1989 the HRA reviewed a letter from the 50th and France Business and Professional Association concerning a proposed 1989 project. The proposed project would include the following elements: 1. Sidewalk Renovation 2. Signage Upgrade 3. Ramp Renovation - Painting and Interior Lighting 4. Landscaping Upgrade 5. Replacement of Street Furnishings 6. Pedestrian Lighting 7. Carillon Tower and Kiosk Upgrading The Association also asked that the HRA consider the use of tax increment financing for the project. The HRA continued the matter to the April 3 meeting and invited representatives of the Association to appear. Director Hughes presented slides illustrating the existing condition of the items proposed to be renovated or upgraded. He then presented the following information. 50th and France History - The City and the HRA created the 50th & France redevelopment and tax increment financing district in 1974. At that time, the HRA adopted a commercial area redevelopment plan. Prior to 1974 the City was involved in a limited number of projects at 50th and France that were financed through special assessments; including the construction of the 51st street parking ramp in 1969. Following the establishment of the tax increment financing district, the HRA undertook the initial redevelopment project in 1975 -76. This project included the construction of the 49 1/2 Street parking ramp, the expansion of the 51st Street parking ramp and numerous sidewalk, roadway, landscaping and lighting improvements. In 1977 and 1978 the HRA undertook additional improvements including the carillon tower and fountain as well as work in the vicinity of Arby's Restaurant. In 1988 the 51st Street parking ramp was expanded by approximately 115 parking spaces. The initial redevelopment project was financed through a combination of special assessments and tax increment financing, with 20% of the project costs assessed against benefitted properties and the remaining 80% financed through tax increment financing, state aid and CDBG funds. The special assessments were levied on a floor area basis and were spread over 15 years. The special assessment for the initial redevelopment project was approximately $2.15 /square foot of floor area. The 1988 ramp expansion was likewise financed through a combination of special assessment and tax increment financing, with approximately 30% of the costs to be assessed against the Edina Theatre and the balance financed through tax increments. No businesses other than the theatre will be assessed for the`51st Street ramp expansion. Status of Tax Increment District - The 50th and France tax increment financing district will exist until 2009 to repay debts incurred prior to April of 1990. Public debt incurred after April 1990 must be repaid prior to 2001. An analysis of the present status of the district illustrates that the final bond principal n and interest payment..for the original 1976 -78 redevelopment project will occur in 1993. Likewise, the loan from the City to finance the 51st Street ramp expansion can be repaid by 1991. Assuming a very conservative 28 inflation rate, the amount of tax increments collected substantially exceeds the current obligations of the district. As such, the estimated reserve balance of the district will grow substantially in the next two to three years. Based on estimates, it appears that the reserve balance will be great enough in 1991 to pay all remaining obligations of the district. If no other debt were incurred, the City and HRA could elect to terminate the district at that time. Proposed 1989 Project - Detailed design of the proposed 1989 project has not been undertaken. As a result, the total estimated cost is difficult to determine at this time. The major variable affecting cost will be the treatment selected for the sidewalk paver areas. Total paver area is estimated at between 19,000- 20,000+ square feet. Replacement options range from $3.50 to $4 a square foot for concrete, $10 to $11 a square foot for concrete or brick pavers, to $15 to $20 a square foot for more ornate materials. If a product such as concrete pavers were selected the anticipated total project cost would be in the range of $500,000- 600,000 at a minimum, exclusive of any additional off - street parking facilities. Finance Alternatives - The following general alternatives could be consider by the HRA for this project: 1. Finance project cost solely through tax increment financing. 2. Assess all costs against commercial area properties. 3. Assess 20% or some other percentage of cost and finance balance through tax increment financing. HRA Action - Staff needs direction concerning the use of tax increment financing for this project. The scope and design standards for certain elements of the project will be affected by the availability of tax increment financing. If the decision is made that a portion of the project cost should be financed through special assessments, then a date should be set for a project hearing and notices sent to all properties proposed to be assessed. Also, if tax increments are to be used for any portion of the project cost, a public hearing should be conducted to amend the tax increment financing district's finance plan. Both hearings could be held at the same time, but not sooner than May'l in order to meet publication requirements. Hosmer Brown, representing the 50th and France merchants, said that the existing pavers have been costly to maintain and the litigation risk is high. He pointed out that retail sales are becoming extremely competitive in the entire metropolitan area. The merchants at'50th and France will have to compete with the megamall in Bloomington, the large expansion at Southdale, the Galleria and the proposed retail area on the Hedberg site. In order to get a fair share of the consumer dollar, the 50th and France area must attract good shops and to do that the area must be attractive. He explained that the City has been asked to participate in the proposed project because of the diversity of people and personalities among the merchants at 50th and France. He urged the Commissioners to approve HRA assistance for the proposed project. Mr. Brown also asked that the City look ahead to 1990 and consider whether additional parking capacity in the 49. 1/2 Street ramp area would be justified. In addition, he asked the Commissioners to keep their minds open as to possible covered walkways for 50th and France. He referred to the local transportation that is being considered for the Southdale area and suggested that, in the future, the City think about some sort of public transportation that would tie together all the commercial areas of the City. Mayor Richards asked if the merchants have discussed what might be fair and equitable as to special assessment for the proposed project. Mr. Brown said that they probably could live with a special assessment of 20% as before. The Commissioners then discussed various issues of the proposed project including the impact of the existing tax increments districts on the general fund, whether funds could be transferred between districts, importance of keeping the area attractive, savings in maintenance costs for the area if renovation and upgrading is done, need for additional parking on the north side in the future, percentage of project cost that could be specially assessed, and priorities for various elements of the proposed project. Commissioner Smith made a motion directing staff to schedule a public hearing on May 15, 1989 for the proposed 1989 50th and France project, to obtain cost estimates for the project and to present a funding proposal for the project based on 20% of costs being assessed to benefitted property with the remaining 80% financed through tax increments. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. REQUEST OF R.P.I. SERVICES FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING ASSISTANCE CONSIDERED; STAFF DIRECTED TO CONTINUE WORKING WITH DEVELOPERS ON CONCEPT. Assistant Director Hughes recalled that the Council granted preliminary rezoning approval to Planned Senior Residence PSR -4 on September 19, 1988 for property located in the northwest quadrant of Parklawn Avenue and York Avenue. The proposed project involved a development for 72 dwelling units designed for fail elderly that would provide a level of service above traditional senior housing, but less than a nursing home would provide. The proposed development would be located on land presently owned by 750.0 York. Development of the property would be accomplished by way of a land swap between 7500 York and Hedbergs. The land exchange has been pursued for several years and has been encouraged by-staff. The original proponents of the project, R.P.I. Services, Inc., have entered into an agreement with the Craig C. Avery Company to develop the project: When completed, it is proposed to be conveyed to Ebenezer Society and Lutheran General Health Care Systems who will own and manage the building. Director Hughes advised that the proponents have recently approached staff and requested tax increment financing assistance as well as the potential use of housing revenue bonds. The request was formally made in a letter dated March 30, 1989 from R.P.I. Services, Inc. Regarding the tax increment financing assistance, the proponents have suggested a pay -as- you -go concept. Under this proposal, the HRA would agree to contribute each year an amount comprising all or part of the tax increment generated from the project in that year. This contribution would be conditioned upon payment by the project of its annual real estate taxes. The tax increment contribution presumably would be used to reduce interest costs, thereby making the project feasible. Under this arrangement, the HRA would not have to sell bonds or incur capital expenditures for the acquisition of the land or other improvements. Rather, the HRA would pay tax increment only if real estate taxes are paid. Therefore, the HRA'would not be at risk as may be the case if bonds were issued. The HRA could structure the annual contribution as an unrecoverable grant to the project or it could be structured as a loan, which could be repaid following termination of the tax increment district. The proposed project is located in the original Southeast Edina Tax Increment Financing District established in 1977. Based upon staff's understanding of the present law, tax increment contributions could be extended to the project until the year 2009. No tax increment payments could be made following that date. He noted also that tax increments from this property have not been relied upon for the Centennial Lakes project or for Edinborough. As to housing revenue bonds, staff presently is unclear as to the eligibility of this project for tax.exempt bonds. Such bonds were issued for the Edina Park Plaza and the Vernon Terrace projects. If such bonds were issued, they are backed only by revenues of the project itself, not by the general obligations of the City. Use of housing revenue bonds typically requires that a certain percentage of the units are available to low and moderate income residents. Director Hughes concluded his presentation with the comment that if the HRA wishes to consider public assistance for this project, it should direct staff to prepare a draft development agreement for HRA review. Such an agreement could be considered in connection with final development plan review by the City Council at a future meeting. Larry Olson, R.P.I. Services, Inc., advised that since the Council granted preliminary rezoning and plat approval for Elder Homestead, they have been busy continuing the plans, developing costs, conducting in -depth market analysis and assembling the final development ownership team. He said that Ebenezer brings expertise in management of seniors' project and an excellent reputation in the market place. Craig C. Avery Company has joined R.P.I. Services to provide a wide range of real estate experience and to assure that a timely, cost effective and state of the art facility is built. The Elder Homestead Corporation, represented by Bob Peterson, has been,involved with cutting edge research and operating experience in assisted living. Mr. Olson said that the project is geared to the 1990's needs of the frail elderly, a rapidly expanding part of the seniors' market. It has been designed to fit the needs of Edina, it is residential in nature and offers a wide range of affordability through setting aside 20% of the units for the low and moderate income senior. He introduced Bob Peterson, Mark. Thomas and Sid Inman saying they would differentiate their project and the market that it meets from the traditional seniors' projects and nursing homes. Bob Peterson said he wanted to focus the Council on who we are really talking about as the frail elderly. Nationally, assisted living is probably one of the fastest breaking kinds of service program. The frail elderly refers to people 85, 90 and 95 years of age. As a culture we have not as yet experienced any large number of these people who are still living in the community and participating. The intent of a program like Elder Homestead is to provide an environment which adapts to those people's needs versus requiring them to change their life style to adapt to an environment such as a nursing home which can be very stressful for them. Elder Homestead is planned to provide a dignified residential setting for fragile old people who do not need nursing homes or hospitals. What they need is someone around 24 hours a day to be sure they are okay, to be sure they get their meds, and to be sure they get three meals. If they need nursing care, that is brought by a qualified home health agency. Mr. Peterson stated that these kinds of programs work beautifully when tied into a continuum of care such as offered by Ebenezer. The proposed facility completes that continuum so that the people at 7500 York or The Durham, etc, where there are large concentrations of elderly, well into their eighties, have a place to get service and to'live and contribute without having to leave their community. Mark Thomas, President of Ebenezer Society, said he would briefly go over their history, how they look at this project and their interest in it. The Ebenezer Society is an affiliate of Lutheran General Health Care Systems out of Chicago. Both Ebenezer and Lutheran General are social ministry organizations under the "i . Evangelical Lutheran Church of America. The Society was established in 1917 and has been providing services to the older adult population in the metro area since that time. He noted that currently, the Ebenezer Society operates and owns four health care centers providing services to approximately 800 beds; three adult day care centers providing services to 100 residents per day; eight housing projects that they either own or manage, including 7500 York in Edina. Their community services division provides services to over 2,000 clients in the metro area. Their transportation division has a fleet of 25 vehicles and is a Metro Mobility provider to over 3,000 clients. He explained that they are also in joint venture with Group Health and have developed a social HMO which has a membership of over 3,500 people. Mr. Thomas said that their interest in this project looks specifically at the continuum of care concept. Part of their mission is to provide services at all ranges in the health care system, starting with independent housing supported by community services to help frail individuals stay there as long as they desire, going into board /care services up to skilled nursing facilities and including specialized nursing care. He said that the assisted care concept is an alternative that is receiving a lot of interest these days and is an area that needs to be looked at very carefully. Also, the elderly themselves are expressing a great interest in this alternative. Experience in the industry is a major reason for Ebenezer's participation in the project together with its location adjacent to the 7500 York Avenue development that they currently manage. He concluded with the comment that their interest is a strong one and that they feel there definitely is a market for this type of project. Sid Inman, Publicorp, said they were advising the developer regarding financing on the project. R.P.I. Service's letter had addressed some of the problems this project has as a real estate development, e.g. interest rate increase, increased land holding costs which are typical real estate financing considerations. He said that they do have a unique feature in the project which is why they are addressing the need for tax increment financing. Due to the type of product they are required to provide 20% of the units for the low and moderate income, hopefully, mostly Edina residents. Mr. Inman said that what this basically means is that, if you compare it to a real estate development where you are leasing space or renting office space, they are required up front to discount 20% of their service so that they automatically have a negative shortfall going into the project. Because the project is unique they have recommended a unique type of tax increment application referred to as pay -as- you -go. Rather than asking the City to take any risk up front, the building will actually be up and possibly occupied before the City will have any financial commitment to make. He said it was an advantage from their perspective because that money can then be used to directly benefit the individual tenants in the building. On a year to year basis the money will be used directly for what it is intended to do and that is attack those 20% of low and moderate income. Mr. Inman added that the City think about the idea of Tax Exempt Housing Bonds. The same technique applies here, with the high interest rates and the already negative economic feature of the 20% low and moderate income units; they have to develop financing that is below market rate so that the project will work. He mentioned that the trend now in Washington is to go back to these types of requirements for housing. He asked that the Council consider directing staff to discuss the application of these two types of financing tools with them. Member Smith commented that typically with tax increment proposals there is some benefit directly to the City and that he had not heard that. Mr. Peterson said that the payoff is really to the seniors in the community who will have this kind of resource available to them, that it is part of the quality of life, just as are streets, shopping malls, theatres, etc. Member Kelly asked about the range of rent costs for residents and if priority could be be given to Edina citizens. As to housing revenue bonds, she said she was concerned that even though the City was not at risk, if they are floated under the .name of the City of Edina, that people will assume that the City is putting its full faith and credit behind the bonds. She said that the City should be careful in using that tool in a project unless the City is assured that it will be a successful project. Mr. Peterson said that, based on their experience with the Minnetonka project, the market rate rents are estimated to be between $1200 to $1400. This would fall well within the national average for assisted living. Tax increment financing would allow them to reduce the rates for the 20% units designated for low and moderate income. Mayor Richards asked for clarification that the proposal is for a dollar amount for a period of time. He asked what would happen after the negotiated term ends. Mr. Peterson explained that the pay -as- you -go concept as it has been applied in housing is to try to structure the assistance with an end date. The point is to try to get the revenues over that continuum to graduate to the point that the expenses are also under control so that assistance is no longer needed. It can be structured in many different ways, one way is to put a bond up front and reduce the cost. Mr. Peterson said that the pay -as- you -go method really addresses the costs for the 20% of units for low and moderate income. They will be able to measure and demonstrate in subsequent hearings what the money is being used for. Mr. Peterson addressed the question of how this would service Edina residents. He said that the pattern is quite standard nationally that the draw for a project like this will be within a 3 -5 mile radius or it will involve elderly persons who are coming into the area because their children live in the neighborhood. The importance of putting facilities in communities is to allow the elderly to be able to stay in their own communities or be near their families. Mayor Richards asked if guidelines could be drafted by the City that would be adopted in exchange for public assistance whereby the issue of preference for Edina residents could be addressed. Mr. Inman said that under the tax increment law you can pretty much structure anything you want under this method. The only restrictions would be those imposed by state law and the federal income tax law. He commented that they are highly aware of the sensitivity of the bonds and that they are also considering some other vehicles for placement, such as a private institution. Member Paulus commented that when this proposal was first introduced there was no request for public assistance from the City. She asked why this was not figured in when the project was first proposed. Mr. Olson responded that the market research done since then has indicated a need to offer the assisted living to a wider range of income and secondly, there has been some federal legislation introduced which is impacting the 20% requirement. Member Paulus asked if they have the 20% requirement units available in their existing facilities. Mr. Olson said that in their Minnetonka project there is not the 20% set aside, but that he believed that going forward that would be a characteristic of all their projects. Member Paulus said she felt that the concept was excellent, but that she was concerned with recent demographics for Edina that most of the elderly that would apply for the assisted living housing would fall into the 20% low and moderate income category. Another concern was that it seems like all the developments in southeast Edina are being financed through tax increment financing and that the citizens will question the City's heavy involvement. Mayor Richards said the issue is do we want the staff to explore further the request to utilize tax increment financing for the project. Member Smith made a motion that the City not proceed with any discussions on tax increment financing or any other type of public assistance for the proposed Elder Homestead project. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Member Kelly said she understood the concerns of Members Paulus and Smith. She pointed out that we have made commitments to provide housing for the younger age citizens in the same area of the City and that we should make the same sort of commitment to our older citizens. She agreed that the low income'level is with our elderly and that Edina has the highest.amount of seniors per capita in Hennepin County. Member Kelly said she was concerned about the rental amount for the project in that it would be too costly for our elderly citizens. She added that she would like to see the staff continue discussing this with the developers and bring back information as to how it would impact our general fund. She noted that the project land trade with the Centennial Lakes project also gave her incentive to support public financing assistance. Mayor Richards then called the motion on the floor. Ayes: Paulus, Smith Nays: Kelly, Rice, Richards Motion failed. Following further discussion, Member Kelly then made a motion to direct staff to work with the development group for Elder Homestead on the concept of public financing and to bring back a recommendation for Council consideration. Motion was seconded by Mayor Richards. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards Nays: Smith Motion carried. RESOLUTION ADOPTED REGARDING EXEMPTION FROM REAL ESTATE TARES FOR BLOOMINGTON PARCEL - CENTENNIAL LAKES Executive Director Hughes advised that a small portion of the Centennial Lakes property is located within the City of Bloomington and that this parcel is proposed to be developed for hotel uses at a future date. As with the Edina property,, the Bloomington parcel is owned via contract for deed by the Edina HRA. Therefore, this property may be eligible for real estate tax exemption until it is resold to the developers. The redevelopment contract for Centennial Lakes requires that the HRA cooperate in obtaining this exemption. Director Hughes explained that staff has administratively applied for the exemption with the City of Bloomington. Bloomington has declined to exempt the property because they believe it is not eligible for exemption. The developers of the project have asked that the request for exemption should be re -filed with Bloomington and the County and should be supported by a resolution of the HRA certifying that the subject property is being held by the HRA for later resale for economic development purposes. He added that if the exemption is ultimately denied, the developers are responsible for the payment of the taxes. Commissioner Rice introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, by contract for deed dated October 3, 1988 and filed October 14, 1988 with the Hennepin County Recorder as Document No. 5465055 and with the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles as Document No. 1966600, the HRA purchased certain real property in Hennepin.County, Minnesota including, among other parcels, the parcel of real property legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and having a Property Identification No. of 05- 027 -24 -22 -0002 (the "Subject Property "); WHEREAS, the Subject Property is being held by the HRA for later resale for economic development purposes; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the certification to the Hennepin County Assessor and City of Bloomington dated March 13, 1989 executed by Gordon L. Hughes, as Executive Director of the HRA that the Subject Property is being held by the HRA for later resale for economic development purposes be, and it hereby is, ratified in all respects and said certification shall, and hereby does, constitute the certification of the Board of Directors of the HRA. RESOLVED FURTHER, that,Gordon L. Hughes, as Executive Director of the HRA be, and he hereby is, authorized to execute on behalf of the Board of Directors of the HRA such other certifications as may be required by law in order to certify that the Subject Property is being held by the HRA for later resale for economic development purposes. EXHIBIT "A" That part of the North one -half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 5, Township 27, Range 24, described as beginning at a point on the North line thereof 1304.875 feet Nest along said North line from the Northeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 5; thence Wiest along said North line 354.75 feet; thence South, parallel to the East line of said Northwest Quarter, 475.5 feet; thence Northeasterly to a point which is 327.7 feet South along a line drawn parallel to the East line of said Northwest Quarter from the point of beginning; thence North along said last described parallel line to the point of beginning, according to the United States. Government Survey thereof and situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Commissioner Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Motion was made by Commissioner Kelly and was seconded by Commissioner Smith for adjournment. Motion carried. Executive Director I* A. ch •'N�bapow -1`O/ laa9 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: CITY COUNCIL /HRA From: GORDON L. HUGHES ASSISTANT CITY.MANAGER Date: MAY 1, 1989 Subject: AMENDMENT'S TO FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, ZONIN ORDINANCE AND REDEVELOP MENT AGREEMENT Recommendation: Agenda Item # NRA :m A,3, c Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends 0 To HRA To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion It is recommended to approve amendment's to final development plan, zoning ordinance and redevelopment agreement. Info /Background: On April 17, 1989, the City Council and the HRA reviewed the development proposal of Hawthorn Suites for the vacant parcel at Edinborough. The Council and the HRA continued the matter to the May 1, 1989, meeting and requested that the following items be addressed or clarified. 1. Project signage 2. The zoning ordinance amendment relative to permitted hotels 3. Public parking rights on the hotel site 4. Provisions to insure that the hotel will be built and fees will be paid when due 5. Service of beer, wine and liquor at the hotel Attached is a memo from Craig Larsen which reviews the proposed signage for the hotel. Also included in his memo is a proposed amendment to the zoning ordinance permitting a suites hotel in the mixed- development district. The definition of the suites hotel is patterned around that proposed by Hawthorn Suites. Report and Recommendation May 1. 1989 Page Two Also attached is a letter from Thomas Erickson which outlines the requirement of the redevelopment contract as to the payment of fees and the construction of the project. We believe the existing contracts provide the necessary assurances that the project will be completed. The Council /HRA identified two issues concerning public parking on the hotel site: First, the Council had an interest in reserving rights to construct the parking deck on the property in the future, if warranted. Second, the Council requested a non - exclusive easement covering the hotel parking lot for use by park visitors. As to the first point, Hawthorn Suites has agreed to a reservation in favor of the City to construct a one -level parking deck on the hotel site, provided that the lower level is enclosed and Hawthorn approves of architectural design. Hawthorn also requests assurances that ramp construction will not impact hotel operations. As to the easement for park parking, Hawthorn has prepared a revised parking lot plan for the site, which increases the size of the parking lot from 166 spaces to 186 spaces. This parking lot has been designed such that 86 spaces would be reserved for exclusive hotel use and the remaining 100 spaces would be available on a non - exclusive basis to park users 24 hours per day. Hawthorn has agreed to construct and maintain the entire parking lot. In consideration of the increased parking . lot size and public use, staff has recommended that the HRA assume responsibility of the construction of the tramway /service drive area located partially on City park property and partially on hotel property as well as the public sidewalk, extending from Edinborough Way on the south and west to the westerly entrance to Edinborough Park. We estimate the cost of these improvements at approximately $30,000. Hawthorn Suites intends to submit to the Council a letter outlining their understanding and commitments relative to the service of liquor at the hotel. This letter states, among other things, that complimentary beer, wine or liquor will not be served to hotel guests or others as an enticement or during the hotels hors d'oeuvre hour in the afternoon. In staff's opinion, a reasonable agreement has been fashioned dealing with present parking rights, future parking, and HRA public improvements. We believe that the 100 parking stalls that will be provided for public use will adequately serve the parking demand for Edinborough Park, particularly during weekday hours. Therefore, we recommend approval of the amendment to the final development plan, the amendment to the zoning.ordinance permitting limited- service hotels and an amendment to the redevelopment agreement with the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. M E M O R A N D U M DATE: May 1, 1989 TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager FROM: Craig Larsen, City Planner SUBJECT: HAWTHORN SUITES PROPOSAL The Council, at its April 17, 1989 meeting, continued the hearing on the Hawthorn application and asked for further information on parking, signage, and specific language for an ordinance amendment. Signage: Staff will be preparing a sign ordinance amendment which will address commercial signage in the MD -5 and MD -6 districts. This amendment would control signage for Edinborough and for Centennial Lakes. We will propose the same standards that we now use in the PC -3, commercial district. The proposed hotel signage conforms to the PC -3 signage standards. In addition to size standards, signage in a mixed use development should have a common theme. Staff is suggesting the use of Edinborough green and bright brass accents to carry through the Edinborough theme in the hotel signage. Zoning Ordinance Amendment: Hotels are currently an allowed use in the PC -2 and PC -3 zoning districts. The proposed amendment would allow only "suites hotels" in the MD -5 district. A suites hotel is defined as a hotel in which at least 80% of the rooms are two -room suites 400 square feet or greater in size. Parking: The third attachment to this report summarizes the parking situation at Edinborough. On week days the park relies on the upper level parking deck adjacent to the office building. The deck provides 178 parking spaces.. All of the office building's 463 spaces are available to park users on nights and weekends. Hawthorn Suites: The revised parking plan for Hawthorn provides 186 surface spaces. Eighty -six of the spaces are reserved for hotel guests, and 100 spaces would be shared with the park, on a non - exclusive basis. EXISTING-STANDARDS-FOR HOTEL SIGNAGE Zoning District PC -3 Permitted Free Standine Signs - 1 per street frontage size: 100 square feet for 1st 50 square feet for all others Hawthorn Proposal: 100 square feet for 1st at southerly entry at Minnesota Drive 37 square feet for 2nd at Minnesota Drive and Edinborough Way Wall Signs: Permitted: 15% of wall area Hawthorn Proposal: South wall 2 signs totalling 1% West wall 1 sign at 6% North Wall none East Wall none Other: Color: Green with illuminated white letters, green should match green in Edinborough signs and there should be some bright brass accents. Building Exterior Signa e 2' 0" letters. material returns, back and retainers .063 aluminum painted green. PMS 342. Sign face acrylic white illuminated by neon two rows. Mounted on transformer raceway. Hotel 8" cut out letters aluminum painted white non - illuminated. N ANN :9 H O T E L APPENDIX M 1 4 `20' Illuminated Pylon Sign 8' 3" x 12'0" O.A.H. 20' up to 30' pylon. Face and cabinet.080 aluminum painted green PIVIS 342. pole cover.080 aluminum painted dark bronze #313. two Poles mounted inside the pole cover. Illuminated by hi-output fluorescent lamps. Double face interior illuminated pylon sign routed copy and logo backed with white acrylic. (Optional) copy and logo bordered with gold trim cap. 0 Ui C? N io d 12'-0" d'r," Directional Sign 1' 6" x 4' 0" single face Directional Sign. Post and panel construction. Background painted to match PMS 342 green. White vinyl die cut logo and copy. Bronze PMS #313 2" x 2- posts. i c i 4' -0" APPENDIX 0 ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825) TO ADD SUITES HOTEL TO MIXED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND TO ADD A DEFINITION OF,SUITES HOTELS THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 14.B. is hereby amended by adding the following permitted use: 8. Suites Hotels Section 2. Section 3.D. is hereby amended by adding the following definition: SUITES HOTELS: A hotel in which at least 80 percent of the guest rooms are two -room suites containing at least 400 square feet of gross floor area. EDINBOROUGH PARKING SUMMARY: CONDOMINIUMS: Underground garages Surface lots PARK PLAZA, SENIORS Underground garages Surface lot OFFICE Upper level ramp Lower level ramp Surface lot HAWTHORN SUITES PROPOSAL Surface lot Hotel only PARK PARKING SUMMARY WITH HOTEL Existing Weekdays Weekends and nights With Hotel 585 spaces 195 spaces 780 spaces 144 spaces 65 spaces 209 spaces 178 spaces 177 spaces 108 spaces_ 463 186 spaces 86 spaces Spaces Available 178 spaces 463 spaces Weekdays 278 spaces Weekends and nights 563 spaces 350 PARE AVENUE NEW YORE, NEW YORK 10022 (212) 415 -9200 3 GRACECHURCH STREET LONDON EC3V OAT, ENGLAND 01- 929 -3334 36, RUE TRONCHET 73009 PARIS, FRANCE 01- 42- 66 -59 -49 340 FIRST NATIONAL BANE BUILDING P. 0. BOX 848 ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 55903 (507)288 -3156 510 NORTH CENTRAL LIFE TOWER 445 MINNESOTA STREET ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 (612)227 -8017 DORSEY & WHITNEY' A P-EEEHIP INCLUUINO PR 810NAL CORPO "ONR 2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 (612) 340 -2600 TELEX 29 -0605 TELECOPIER (612) 340 -2868 THOMAS S. ERICKSON, P. A. (612) 340 -2659 April 26, 1989 Honorable Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority .of Edina, Minnesota; and Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland, Director 4801.West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 1200 FIRST INTERSTATE CENTER 401 NORTH 31" STREET P. 0. BOX 7188 BILLINGS, MONTANA 59103 (406)252 -3800 201 DAVIDSON BUILDING 8 THIRD STREET NORTH GREAT FALLS, MONTANA 59401 (406)727 -3632 127 EAST FRONT STREET MISSOULA, MONTANA 59602 (406)M-60--5 315 FIRST NATIONAL BANE BUILDING WAYZATA. MINNESOTA 55391 (612)475 -0373 Re: Edinborough - Proposed Hotel Development Dear Commissioners and Mr. Rosland: At the meeting of April 17 regarding the above matter, the Commissioners raised two issues to,which this letter is intended to respond. They were (i) when would certain fees be paid by the Developer and (ii) what assurance does the City have that the Project will get built and if not built the City can recover the property. Payment of Fees. All of the fees payable by the Purchaser of the Hotel Site will be payable at closing in exchange for a deed from the HRA. Until that time, of course, there will be no proceeds from which to pay those fees. One exception to the foregoing statement is the Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000) which is payable to the City pursuant to Section 3.1(f)(ii) of the Redevelopment Agreement. That Section provides that the Fifty, Thousand Dollars will be "payable when the structure and exterior of the [building] to be constructed . , has been Substantially Completed; ". Substantially Completed is defined by the Agreement to be, as to the Hotel Site, at the,time of "enclosure of the building . . , as certified by the Building Official of the City." Construction of the Project. The Redevelopment Agreement provides that construction of. the Hotel Site must commence within thirty days after approval by the HRA of the construction plans and conveyance of the property to the Developer. It goes on to state that subject to "Unavoidable Delays" the Developer shall DORSEY & WHITNEY April 26, 1989 Page Two complete the construction and receive a Certificate of Completion from the HRA within twenty -four months from the date of the deed from the HRA. Unavoidable Delays are defined as such things as strikes, adverse weather, fire or other casualty or other causes beyond the reasonable control of the Developer. The Agreement further provides that at closing the Developer will deliver to. the HRA a policy of builders risk insurance in the amount equal to one hundred percent of the insurable value of the Hotel at the date of completion using the so- called 'all-risk" form of'policy... The Agreement then provides that any damage or destruction to the building in excess of One Hundred Thousand Dollars are to be paid to an insurance trustee and'to be used solely to repair, reconstruct and restore the damaged building. The money is paid out by the trustee only pursuant to the Developer's request for funds and a certificate from an independent engineer or appraiser that the work in fact has been done. In addition, the Agreement provides that a failure of the Developer to commence construction within the agreed upon time or to complete construction within the agreed upon time, again subject to "Unavoidable Delays,." is a default under the Agreement. If such a default occurs the HRA has the right to give notice to the Developer and the Developer has a period of time to cure the default. If the default is not cured the HRA has a number of remedies available to it, one of which is to re -enter and take possession of the property and to terminate the ownership interest held by the Developer and to revest in the HRA all of the interest of the Developer in the property. The Agreement further provides that such re -entry and revesting in the HRA shall terminate the lien of any mortgage and that the rights of the HRA shall be prior to the rights of the holder of any mortgage then on the property, unless the holder of the mortgage undertakes to complete the improvements on the property, in which case the mortgage lien does not terminate but continues as a lien. The above provisions of the Agreement are designed to give some assurance to the HRA that the improvements imposed by the Developer will in fact be constructed. Of course, it is always possible that a Developer could contest the existence of a default, the propriety of any notice of default and the propriety of any revesting of title in the HRA. Very truly yours, Th mas S. Erickson TSE : lmw �., Agenda Item HRA /Council II. April 28, 1989 7615 Edinborough Way #4210 Edina, MN 55435 Edina City Council Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 . Dear Council Members: As a concerned resident of the Edinborough condominium community, I am writing in regard to the upcoming vote on the Hyatt Hotel development adjacent to Edinborough Park. For the past year I have served as a member of the Board of Directors of the Edinborough Condominium Association as well as a member of the Rules and Regulations and Park and Recreation Committees. Our major responsibility has been to draft policy and respond to resident's requests concerning our association. I have atteched a copy of a flier that was circulated in our buildings concerning you upcoming vote on the hotel issue. The flier was unsigned but in my opinion it represents the minority view of a few residents. From my experience serving on the Board, residents In opposition to any changes concerning our development have always written or telephoned us with their concerns. With the exception of one phone call, neither I nor any of the other Board members have been contacted regarding resident opposition to the plans for the hotel construction. I cannot speak for all the residents of the Association, but it is my opinion that a large majority of; the residents are unopposed to the'hotel development. Because I enjoy our community as others do, I would hope that issues such as security and parking be addressed by the City Council and the developers of the hotel. I also request that the Council consider the number of residents voicing opposition and remember that the total Edinborough community consists of 392 condominiums, approximately 150 rental units, and all the businesses and employees that occupy the office building. I hope your decision is based on what is best for Edina and our Edinborough community and not on the views of the outspoken few. Sincerely, Lk C . %tk Bob C. Tift H 4w: 1irease in propf Y vaI w-" I i n'k, .Ikwf ?4V1rznnn&N+. z r , M Le+ Hc�l m h+- a g�sis wa I bn 11 � 4CO 0 King it 4 r e Vv 4ino r�-ty &Y)C'l KwVV how abut V19 Please plan on attending 4 very important City Council Meeting regarding the proposed re- zoning: Monday, May 1 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 If you cannot attend, please send A lette to =8 City Council at the above listed address. OIL -------- - ------- ---------- - ----- ---- - L a . .. . ........ a �� / �� ' C- ��G�/ �-C/ /LL`s I� ��C�%G� � �'��" G�'�� 1 �y`zw� �� /�G� lcE, Z� �� (iC.�C ��•1/y1� � � �LCG- G�G�C' �C- L— ?til�C- ,2c>_• �' .(iC�i . .��L -�� G _ if/j� L tL�Zr' �:��G'� , 21tz" April 28, 1989 Edina City Council Council Chambers Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN, 55424 Dear Members of the Council: As a homeowner and resident of the Village Homes of Edinborough, I am writing to express my concerns about the proposed construction of a hotel at Edinborough. My concerns include the following: * Parking and traffic congestion. • Hotel guests walking on Edinborough grounds could create safety and upkeep issues. • Hotel guests using Edinborough park may cause over - crowded conditions. • Decreased property value could result due to a hotel in the vicinity. Construction of a hotel is a major change from what was represented to me when I purchased my home. An office building was originally planned. I, like many other residents, work during the day and would not be affected by an influx of people during business hours. However, hotel guests would arrive and remain during the hours I and others are typically at home. If you approve the hotel proposal before you, a hotel will be located about 100 feet from my living room window. This is unacceptable and I ask for your support in denying the proposal to construct a hotel. Sincerely, Jv`� Ji E. Quarnstrom 7635 Edinborough Way #5109 Edina, MN 55435 -- - - - - -- -- - -- ---- - - - - -- - -- ------- - -�f�r i-t..� �1c� ✓►�C.., .__� - -.� r�Lt'E- !a � _c�-� ___A SS CSC. -_•. - �s -- - - - -- `r, - - - -. A nd -tom -- V v� - A�S_cv�� - -- C`.-- hc��e.�. ., _%�.+•,�� _ Ic�S.,c�— �,� . ati.�., -�.. ----- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - -- -- - - - - -- - ---- -- - - ---- - - - - -- -- - - -- L- -- -- - -- - -- --- -lan.► 4-4� �� ecd• v 14/Z-7/ y -1 554z4 `r C-h � h � L- y � !1 � �,✓ . � c... yam, G. � 1' o & b /4. - rr C- k\ 1� -7 6ZZ Y�> ykAv S: � 129 yorJ 55435 HRA /COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM III.A B C M E M O R A N D U M TO: Honorable Members of the City Council and the HRA Board of Commissioners and Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland FROM: Dorsey & Whitney (Jerome P. Gilligan and Thomas S. Erickson) DATE: April 27, 1989 RE: Proposed Refunding of Bonds Issued for Park Plaza Project The City Council is scheduled to hold a public hearing on May 1st on the issuance of bonds to refund (i.e., pay in full) the bonds issued by the City in 1985 to help finance the Edina Park Plaza elderly housing project at Edinborough. You have previously been advised about the reasons for the refunding and we will not cover that issue in this memorandum. The project developer, Edina Park Plaza Associates Limited Partnership, has requested that following the hearing the Council consider a resolution giving final approval to the issuance of the refunding bonds. It appears that the final structure of the refunding bonds will not have been determined by the time of the meeting on Monday. The resolution which has been prepared for the Council to consider approves the issuance of the refunding bonds provided that the final terms are within designated parameters, and delegates to the Mayor and City Manager the authority to approve the final details of the refunding bonds and the various related documentation. Also on May lst the HRA will be asked to adopt a resolution approving the refunding and an amendment of the Elderly Housing Interest Reduction Agreement with the developer. Presently the HRA's obligation to make advances under the Interest Reduction Agreement terminates upon the issuance of the refunding bonds, and upon such a termination the developer is obligated to repay the interest advances. The amendment provides that the refunding will not trigger a termination of the HRA's obligations to make advances or require repayment by the developer at this time. The developer's obligations to the HRA under the Interest Reduction Agreement are secured by a second mortgage on the development. DOBSEY & `N13ITNEY A Pw.r.c. — I.c-- P.or ... -.— C... —A—.. Dain Bosworth is the underwriter for the refunding bonds. The reason the final structure of the refunding bonds has not as yet been determined is that the developer has requested that FHA increase the principal amount of the mortgage loan which it will insure by up to $1,100,000. The present mortgage loan insured by FHA is approximately $14,600,000. Until FHA responds to this request the final structure cannot be determined. Dain has advised us that it is hopeful that a preli- minary response will be received from FHA sometime during the week of May 9th. Once this preliminary response is received, Dain will then market the bonds. Because it is possible that this marketing could occur prior to May .15th (which is the date of the next Council meeting), the developer has requested that the Council give its final approval on May 1st. We have been advised that it is presently anticipated that the refunding bonds will be issued in two series in an aggregate principal amount of approximately $17,500,000. One series would be secured by a mortgage loan which is insured by FHA and by a reserve fund. This series of bonds is expected to be rated "Aa" by Moody's Investors Service, Inc. Depending on FHA's response to the developer's request to increase the principal amount of the mortgage loan, this series of bonds will range, in the principal amount from approximately $15,900,000 to $17,100,000. Dain has advised us that it expects to sell all of the bonds of this series to one institutional investor. The second series will not be secured by a mortgage on the development and will be unrated. This second series of bonds will be purchased by Dain and sold to a relative of one of the limited partners of the developer. Again, the principal amount of the second issue is dependent on the response of the FHA to the developer's request. The range of the principal amount of the second series is from $400,000 to $1,600,000. If FHA approves an increase in the amount of mortgage loan it will insure, it will result in an increase in the amount of first mortgage debt on the development to which the HRH's mortgage is subordinate. We have been advised that the maximum amount by which the first mortgage loan would be increased is $1,100,000. The HRA resolution to be considered at Monday's meeting approves this increase and authorizes the execution by the HRA of the necessary agreements to evidence that the HRA's mortgage is subordinate to the increased mortgage loan. JPG:cmn DOBSEY & WHITNEY - 2 - A P. — ... s. 1—.— P.ores —.1 C...... u 'A RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE EDINA PARK PLAZA PROJECT; APPROVING THE REFINANCING THEREOF AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the Authority) as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. Pursuant to a Trust Indenture, dated as of October 1, 1985, between the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City ") and First Bank National Association (formerly known as First National Bank of Minneapolis), as trustee (the "Prior Bonds Trustee "), the City has heretofore issued and sold its Housing Development Revenue Bonds (FHA Insured Mortgage Loan - Edina Park Plaza Project), Series 1985 (the "Prior Bonds "), in the original aggregate principal amount of $17,622,800. The Prior Bonds are presently outstanding in the aggregate principal amount of approximately $17,345,000. 1.02. Proceeds of the Prior Bonds were used to fund a mortgage loan (the "Mortgage Loan ") to Edina Park Plaza Associates Limited Partnership, an Illinois limited partnership (the "Developer ").and a supplemental loan to Partners for Senior Communities, Inc., an Illinois corporation and a general partner of the Developer (the "General Partner "), for the purpose of acquiring, constructing and equipping an approximately 203 -unit multifamily housing development and functionally related and subordinate facilities located at 7800 York Avenue in the City (the "Development "). 1.03. The Mortgage Loan, which is evidenced by a mortgage note secured by a first mortgage lien on the Development under a Mortgage,.dated as of October 1, 1985 (the "FHA Mortgage ") from the Developer to the Prior Bonds Trustee, has been endorsed for mortgage loan insurance by the Federal Housing Administration of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the Mortgage Loan is presently outstanding in the principal amount of approximately $14,600,000. 1.04. In connection with the financing of the Development, the Authority has heretofore executed and delivered the following documents: (a) the Deed and Covenants Running With the Land, dated as of October 1, 1985 (the "Deed "), from the Authority to the Developer; (b) the Elderly Housing Interest Reduction Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1985 (the "Interest Reduction Agreement "), between the Authority and the Developer; (c) the Escrow Agreement, dated as of October 22, 1985 (the "Escrow Agreement "), between the City, the Authority, the Prior Bonds Trustee, Title Services, Inc, and the Developer; and (d) the Combination Mortgage, Security Agreement, Assignment of Rents and Fixture Financing Statement, dated as of October 1, 1985 (the "Authority Mortgage "), from the Developer to the Authority. The Deed, the Interest Reduction Agreement, the Escrow Agreement and the Authority Mortgage are herein referred to collectively as the "Authority Documents ". -Y= 1.05. Under the Interest Reduction Agreement, the Authority has agreed to use tax increment derived from the tax increment financing district established by the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan and investment income thereon to lend certain amounts (the "Interest Advances ") to the Developer from time to time to pay interest on the Mortgage Loan. Under Section 1(b) of the Interest Reduction Agreement, the obligation of the Authority to make Interest Advances terminates upon an "Event of Termination," as defined therein, including a refunding or defeasance of the Prior Bonds initiated by the Developer. Upon an Event of Termination, Section 4 of the Interest Reduction Agreement requires the Developer to repay certain amounts to the Authority. The obligations of the Developer under the Interest Reduction Agreement are secured by the Authority Mortgage, which is subordinate and junior to the FHA Mortgage. 1.06. The construction and equipping of the Development has been completed, and the Development has been partially leased. Initial leasing projections, have not been met, however, and the Developer and the General Partner are in default under the loan documents securing the Prior Bonds. 1.07. The Developer has requested that the City issue its Housing Development Refunding Revenue Bonds (FHA Insured Mortgage Loan - Edina Park Plaza Project) (the "Bonds "), in one or more series, to refund and redeem the outstanding Prior Bonds and refinance the Development. 1.08. In connection with the refunding of the Prior Bonds, the Developer has requested that the terms of the Mortgage Loan and the FHA Mortgage be amended and assigned to the trustee for the Bonds. The amendments to the Mortgage Loan and the FHA Mortgage may result in an increase in the principal amount of the Mortgage Loan and /or a reduction in the interest rate thereon. Such increase, if any, in the outstanding principal amount of the Mortgage Loan may be evidenced by a supplement or amendment to the Mortgage Loan and the FHA Mortgage or by a supplemental mortgage loan and related mortgage (such supplement, amendment or supplemental mortgage loan and related mortgage being referred to herein as the "Amendments "). The Developer will remain the owner of the Development following the proposed refinancing, and the Development is to remain subject to the FHA Mortgage, as amended by the Amendments, and to the covenants and restrictions (including those in the Deed) heretofore entered in connection with the Prior Bonds. 1.09. The Developer has requested that the Authority consent to the refunding of the Prior Bonds and to the Amendments. The Developer has further requested that the Authority consent to certain amendments to the Interest Reduction Agreement and the other Authority Documents for the purposes, among others, of ensuring that the refunding of the Prior Bonds will not give rise to an Event of Termination and that the lien of the FHA Mortgage, as amended by the Amendments, will remain prior to that of the Authority Mortgage. To this end, there have been prepared and filed with the Authority drafts of a First Amendment to Interest Reduction Agreement and a Consent and Subordination Agreement (collectively, the "Authority Amending Documents "). Section 2. Approvals. 2.01. The proposed refunding of the Prior Bonds, the proposed Amendments and assignment of the Mortgage Loan and the FHA Mortgage, and the transactions described in Section 1 of this resolution in connection with the refinancing of the Development are hereby approved, subject to the terms, conditions and limitations set forth in this resolution; provided, however, that the outstanding principal amount of the Mortgage Loan, as amended by the Amendments, shall not exceed $16,000,000. -2- 2.02. The Authority Amending Documents are hereby approved in the form heretofore submitted to the Authority, with such additions, completions, changes and deletions as may be deemed necessary or appropriate by the officers of the Authority executing the same and subject to the approval of counsel to the Authority. 2.03. Notwithstanding the approvals contained in Section 2 of this resolution, however, the Authority retains the right to withdraw from participation and accordingly to refuse to consent to the Amendments if the Developer fails to provide a mortgagee's policy of title insurance with respect to the Authority Mortgage in form and substance satisfactory to the Authority. Section 3. Authorization. 3.01. Any two officers of the Authority are hereby authorized to execute and deliver the Authority Amending Documents in substantially the form heretofore submitted to the Authority, with such additions, completions, changes and deletions as such officers may consider necessary or appropriate, together with such additional documents, agreements and certificates as the officers executing the same may consider necessary or appropriate to effectuate the proposed refunding of the Prior Bonds and the related transactions described herein. Such documents, agreements and certificates shall be in form and content approved by the officers of the Authority executing the same and counsel to the Authority, and the execution by such officers of the Authority of any such documents, agreements and certificates shall be conclusive evidence of their approval. Adopted this 1st day of May, 1989. ATTEST: Executive Director -3- Chairman r•., RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF HOUSING DEVELOPMENT REFUNDING REVENUE BONDS (FHA INSURED MORTGAGE LOAN - EDINA PARK PLAZA PROJECT), 1989 7A AND 1989 -B, AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION.OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City "), as follows: Section 1. Recitals and Findings. 1.1 By the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended (the "Act "), the City is authorized to plan, administer, issue and sell revenue bonds or obligations to make or purchase loans to finance one or more multifamily housing developments within its boundaries, which revenue bonds or obligations shall be payable solely from the revenues of the development. Pursuant to Section 462C.07, Subdivision 1 of the Act, in the purchase or making of multifamily housing loans and the issuance of revenue bonds or other obligations the City may exercise within its corporate limits any of the powers the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency may exercise under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462A, without limitation under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. 1.2 The City has heretofore developed and, after due notice and public hearing, has adopted'a housing plan (the "Plan ") on April 19, 1982 under the Act. The Plan sets forth, among other things, the housing needs of the City and methods for meeting such needs. The Plan has been reviewed and commented on by the Metropolitan Council pursuant to Section 462C.01, paragraph (c) of the Act. 1.3. The Act provides that the City may plan, administer and make or purchase a loan or loans to finance one or more developments of the kinds described-in Subdivisions 2, 3, 4 and 7 of Section 462C.05 of the Act, upon adoption of a program setting forth the information required by Subdivision 6 of Section 462C.05 of the Act, after a public hearing thereon, and upon approval by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (the "Agency "), as provided by Section 462C.01 of the Act, on the basis of the considerations stated in-Section 462C.04 of the Act. '1.4. This Council has heretofore received a proposal that the City finance the cost of a multifamily housing development under the Act, consisting of acquisition of land located at 7800 York Avenue in the City and the construction and equipping thereon of a residential rental facility containing approximately 203 housing units and including functionally related and subordinate facilities (the "Development "). 1.5. The City has heretofore caused to be prepared and, after due notice, public hearing and submission for review and comment, has adopted a program (the "Original Program ") under the Act relating to the Development. The Original Program, as adopted on June 17, 1985, has been submitted to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency in accordance with Section 462C.05 of the Act for approval as provided in Section 462C.01 on the basis of considerations stated in Section 462C.04 of the Act, and is deemed approved under the provisions of said Section 462C.04, Subdivision 1. -1- r 1.6. Pursuant to the Original Program, the City has heretofore issued and sold its Housing Development Revenue Bonds (FHA Insured Mortgage Loan - Edina Park Plaza Project), Series 1985 (the "Prior Bonds "), and has used the net proceeds of the Prior Bonds to make a mortgage loan (the "Mortgage Loan ") to Edina Park Plaza Associates Limited Partnership, an Illinois limited partnership (the "Developer ") and a supplemental loan to Partners for Senior Communities, Inc., an Illinois corporation and a general partner of the Developer (the "General Partner "), to finance the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Development. The Mortgage Loan has been endorsed for mortgage loan insurance by the Federal Housing Administration of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. 1.7. In connection with the issuance of the Prior Bonds and the financing of the Development, the Developer has heretofore entered into an Elderly Housing Interest Reduction Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1985 (the "Interest Reduction Agreement "), with the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "Authority "). The obligations of the Developer under the Interest Reduction Agreement are secured by a Combination Mortgage, Security Agreement, Assignment of Rents and Fixture Financing Statement, dated as of October 1, 1985 (the "Authority Mortgage "), from the Developer to the Authority. 1.8. Pursuant to covenants and restrictions entered into in connection with the Prior Bonds, the Development is required to be occupied for a specified period of time primarily by elderly persons and in part (at least 20 %) by persons and families of low and moderate income. 1.9. The construction and equipping of the Development have been completed, and the Development has been partially leased. Initial leasing projections have not been met, however, and the Developer and the General Partner are in default under the loan documents securing the Prior Bonds. 1.10. This Council has received a proposal from the Developer that the City refinance the cost of the Development by issuing its refunding revenue bonds in one or more series (the "Bonds "), for the purpose of refunding and redeeming the outstanding prior Bonds, in connection with a proposed amendment and assignment of the Mortgage Loan. 1.11. The City has heretofore caused to be prepared and has approved an amended program (the "Amended Program ") under the Act, pursuant to which it is proposed that the City issue the Bonds in one or more series and in a maximum aggregate principal amount of $17,500,000 to refund and redeem the Prior Bonds in connection with the proposed amendment and assignment of the Mortgage Loan and the refinancing of the Development. 1.12. The City has been advised by the Developer that conventional commercial financing is available to refinance capital costs of the Development only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the scope of the Development and the economic feasibility of operating the Development would be significantly affected, but with the aid of municipal financing the operation of the Development can be made more economically feasible. 1.13. The City has been advised by representatives of the Developer and Dain Bosworth Incorporated, of Minneapolis, Minnesota (the "Underwriter "), that on the basis of information available to them and their discussions with the Developer and potential purchasers of bonds, the Bonds could be sold at favorable rates and terms to refund and redeem the Prior Bonds and refinance the Development. 1.14. The full faith and credit of the City will not be pledged to or responsible for the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds. -2- 1.15. The City has received drafts of a Trust Indenture, a Financing Agreement and an Escrow Agreement (collectively, the "City Financing Documents "), a draft Bond Purchase Agreement (the "Bond Purchase Agreement "), and a-draft Preliminary Official Statement (the "Preliminary Official Statement ") in connection with the proposed issuance and sale of the Bonds, and has caused such documents to be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. 1.16. Pursuant to notice duly published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City not less than 15 days prior to the date fixed therefor, this Council has held a public hearing on May 1, 1989, at which all interested persons were afforded an opportunity to express their views, in person or in writing, on the proposed issuance of the Bonds. This Council has carefully considered the views submitted at the public hearing. 1.17. It is hereby found, determined and declared as follows: (a) The Development will constitute a multifamily housing development under Section 462C.01, Subdivision 5 of the Act. The City is authorized to develop and finance the Amended Program by the authorization, issuance and sale of refunding revenue bonds or obligations payable solely from the revenues of the Amended Program and the Development. The purpose of the Development is and its effect will be to promote the public welfare and preserve the quality of life in the City by helping to maintain, provide and preserve adequate housing stock within the City and to assist persons of low and moderate income, or elderly persons, or both, to obtain decent, safe and sanitary housing within the City. (b) Based upon representations by the Developer and the General Partner, financing for the Development is not otherwise available to the Developer from private lenders upon terms and conditions which are affordable by the Developer, such financing being available only at a rate which, when combined with the cost of operating the Development as well as noneconomic factors, would impair the feasibility of the Development; the General Partner expects that the revenues to be produced by the rental of units in the Development will be sufficient to meet payments when due on the Mortgage Loan, as amended. 1.18. The findings and approvals contained in Section 1 and 2 of the resolution adopted by this Council on April 17, 1989 with respect to the Development, the Amended Program and the Bonds, to the extent not inconsistent with the provisions of this resolution, are hereby confirmed. Section 2. Approval and Authorization. 2.1. This Council, being the "applicable elected representative" of the City within the meaning of Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, hereby approves and authorizes the .issuance of the Bonds upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. 2.2 It is hereby determined that it is desirable for the City to proceed with the issuance of the Bonds in one or more series, in fully registered form, without coupons, in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $17,500,000, bearing interest at a rate per annum not to exceed 9.00% (except that the Subordinate Bonds, as defined hereinafter, may bear interest at a rate per annum not to exceed 12.00$), maturing not later than December 1, 2030, and bearing the further terms and conditions set forth in the Trust Indenture heretofore filed with the City (as the same may be amended or completed as hereinafter provided); provided, that if the Bonds are to be issued in more than one series, the aggregate principal amount of Bonds, if any, which are not secured by the Mortgage Loan, as amended (the "Subordinate Bonds "), shall not exceed $1,600,000. Subject -3- to the limitations set forth in this Section 2.2, authority is hereby delegated to the Mayor and the City Manager of the City, acting jointly, to determine the aggregate principal amount of Bonds of each series to be issued, the maturities thereof and the rate or rates of interest payable thereon. 2.3. The form of the Bond Purchase Agreement heretofore filed with the City is hereby approved, subject to such changes as may be deemed desirable by the Mayor, the City Manager and the City Attorney. The Mayor and the City Manager of the City are hereby authorized and directed, on behalf of the City, to execute and deliver a bond purchase agreement in substantially the form of the Bond Purchase Agreement heretofore filed with the City, together with such changes and completions thereof as may be approved by the Mayor, the City Manager and the City Attorney, subject to the limitations contained in this resolution, the execution thereof to constitute conclusive evidence of the approval of such changes and completions. 2.4. Authority is hereby delegated to the Mayor and the City Manager of the City, acting jointly, to determine the aggregate purchase price of the Bonds, provided that the aggregate compensation to the Underwriter.(whether in the form of a discount, fees or other compensation) shall not exceed an amount equal to 3.00% of the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds. 2.5. The forms of the City Financing Documents heretofore filed with the City are hereby approved. The Mayor and the City Manager of the City are hereby authorized and directed, on behalf of the City, to execute and deliver the City Financing Documents in substantially the forms hereby approved, but including such modifications, insertions and additions as are necessary and appropriate in their opinion and in the opinion of the City Attorney and consistent with the Act. The execution of the City Financing Documents by the appropriate officers of the City shall be conclusive evidence of the approval thereof by the City. 2.6. The distribution of a preliminary official statement with respect to one or more series of the Bonds to prospective purchasers, in substantially the form of the Preliminary Official Statement heretofore filed with the City and with such changes, insertions, omissions and revisions as the Mayor, City Manager and. City Attorney shall deem advisable, and the use thereof by the Underwriter in connection with the offering of such Bonds, are hereby authorized and approved. The Mayor is authorized to permit the distribution of the final official statement in substantially the form of the Preliminary Official Statement, with such changes, omissions, insertions and revisions as the Mayor, the City Manager and the City Attorney shall deem advisable. 2.7. The Mayor and the City Manager of the City are authorized and directed to prepare and execute the Bonds and to deliver them to the trustee pursuant to the Trust Indenture for authentication and delivery to the purchasers thereof, together with a certified copy of this resolution and other documents required by the Trust Indenture. As provided in the Trust Indenture, the Bonds shall be executed by the manual or facsimile signatures of the Mayor and City Manager and impressed with the seal of the City or a facsimile thereof and shall be authenticated by the trustee, as authenticating agent, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.55, Subdivision 1. 2.8. As provided in the Trust Indenture, the Bonds are special, limited obligations of the City. Principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds are payable solely out of the revenues derived from the sources described in the granting clauses of the Trust Indenture. Neither the State of Minnesota nor the County of Hennepin shall in any event be liable for the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds or for the performance of any pledge, mortgage, obligation or agreement of any kind whatsoever that may be undertaken by the City. Neither the Bonds nor any of the agreements or -4- obligations of the City contained in the City Financing Documents shall be construed to constitute an indebtedness of the State of Minnesota, the County of Hennepin or the City, within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory provisions whatsoever, nor to constitute or give rise to a pecuniary liability or be a charge against the general credit or taxing power of the State of Minnesota, the County of Hennepin or the City. 2.9. The Mayor, the City Manger and the City Clerk of the City are authorized and directed'to prepare and furnish to bond counsel and the Underwriter certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City relating to the Bonds, and such other affidavits and certificates as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality of the Bonds as such facts appear from the books and records in the officers' custody and control or as otherwise known to them; and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall constitute representations of the City as to the truth of all statements contained therein. 2.10. The Mayor and the City Manager of the City are hereby authorized to execute such additional agreements, documents and certificates in connection with the Bonds as may be necessary and appropriate in their opinion and in the opinion of the City Attorney and consistent with the Act. Copies of such additional agreements, documents and certificates, when executed, shall be delivered, filed and recorded as provided therein. 2.11. To evidence the exercise of the authority delegated to the Mayor and City Manager of the City by this resolution, the Mayor and City Manager are hereby directed to execute and file with the.trustee named in the Trust Indenture a certificate setting forth the determinations made by them pursuant to the authority granted in this resolution, which certificate shall constitute conclusive evidence of the proper exercise by them of such authority. 2.12. The approvals hereby given to the various documents referred to above includes approval of such additional details therein as may be necessary and appropriate and such modifications thereof, deletions therefrom and additions thereto as may be approved by the City Attorney and by the Mayor and the City Manager authorized herein to execute said documents prior to their execution; and the Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized to approve said changes-on behalf of the City. The execution of any instrument by the appropriate officer or officers of the City herein authorized shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents in accordance with the terms hereof. In the absence of the Mayor or the City Manager, the documents authorized by this resolution to be executed may be executed by the Acting Mayor or the Assistant City Manager. 2.13. Notwithstanding the approvals and authorizations contained in Section 2 of this resolution, however, the City retains the right to withdraw from participation and accordingly not to issue the Bonds if (i) the Developer or any partner of the Developer fails to provide indemnification to the City, in form and substance satisfactory to the City, in connection with the issuance and sale of the Bonds and the refunding and redemption of the Prior Bonds, or (ii) the Developer fails to provide a mortgagee's policy-of title insurance with respect to the Authority Mortgage in form and substance satisfactory to the Authority. 2.14. The approvals hereby given to the various documents referred to above supersede the provisions of Section 2.6 of the resolution heretofore adopted by this Council on April 17, 1989 relating to the Development and the Bonds. Adopted this 1st day of May, 1989. ATTEST: City Clerk -5- Mayor CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES - RELATING TO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT REFUNDING REVENUE BONDS Issuer: City of Edina, Minnesota Governing Body: City Council Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting, held on May 1, 1989, at 7:00 o'clock P.M.', at the City Hall. Members present: Members absent: Documents-Attached: Minutes of said meeting (pages): RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF HOUSING DEVELOPMENT REFUNDING REVENUE BONDS (FHA INSURED MORTGAGE LOAN - EDINA PARK PLAZA PROJECT), SERIES 1989 -A AND 1989 -B, AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the public corporation issuing the obligations referred to in the title of this certificate, certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of said corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that said documents are a correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of said corporation, and correct and complete copies of all resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents approved by the governing body at said meeting, so far as they relate to said obligations; and that said meeting was duly held by the governing body at the time and place and was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as required by law. WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer this _ day of , 1989. (SEAL) Signature Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF HOUSING DEVELOPMENT REFUNDING REVENUE BONDS (FHA INSURED MORTGAGE LOAN - EDINA PARK PLAZA PROJECT), SERIES 1989 -A AND 1989 -B, AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City "), as follows: Section 1. Recitals and Findings. 1.1. By the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended (the "Act "), the City is authorized to plan, administer, issue and sell revenue bonds or obligations to make or purchase loans to finance one or more multifamily housing developments within its boundaries, which revenue bonds or obligations shall be payable solely from the revenues of the development. Pursuant to Section 462C.07, Subdivision 1 of the Act, in the purchase or making of multifamily housing loans and the issuance of revenue bonds or other obligations the City may exercise within its corporate limits any of the powers the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency may exercise under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462A, without limitation under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. 1.2. The City has heretofore developed and, after due notice and public hearing, has adopted a housing plan (the "Plan ") on April 19, 1982 under the Act. The Plan sets forth, among other things, the housing needs of the City and methods for meeting such needs. The Plan has been reviewed and commented on by the Metropolitan Council pursuant to Section 462C.01, paragraph (c) of the Act. 1.3. The Act provides that the City may plan, administer and make or purchase a loan or loans to finance one or more developments of the kinds described in Subdivisions 2, 3, 4 and 7 of Section 462C.05 of the Act, upon adoption of a program setting forth the information required by Subdivision 6 of Section 462C.05 of the Act, after a public hearing thereon,, and upon approval by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (the "Agency "), as provided by Section 462C.01 of the Act, on the basis of the considerations stated in Section 462C.04 of the Act. 1.4. This Council has heretofore received a proposal that the City finance the cost of a multifamily housing development under the Act, consisting of acquisition of land located at 7800 York Avenue in the City and the construction and equipping thereon of a residential rental facility containing approximately 203 housing units and including functionally related and subordinate facilities (the "Development "). 1.5. The City has heretofore caused to be prepared and, after due notice, public hearing and submission for review and comment, has adopted a program (the "Original Program ") under the Act relating to"the Development. The Original Program, as adopted on June 17, 1985, has been submitted to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency in accordance with Section 462C.05 of the Act for approval as'provided in Section 462C.01 on the basis of considerations stated in Section 462C.04 of the Act, and is deemed approved under the provisions of said Section 462C.04, Subdivision 1. 1.6. Pursuant to the Original Program, the City has heretofore issued and sold its Housing Development Revenue Bonds (FHA Insured Mortgage Loan - Edina Park Plaza Project), Series 1985 (the "Prior Bonds "), and has used the net proceeds of the Prior Bonds to make a mortgage loan (the "Mortgage Loan ") to Edina Park Plaza Associates Limited Partnership, an Illinois limited partnership (the "Developer ") and a supplemental loan to Partners for Senior Communities, Inc., an Illinois corporation and a general partner of the Developer (the "General Partner "), to finance the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Development. The Mortgage Loan has been endorsed for mortgage loan insurance by the Federal Housing Administration of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. 1.7. In connection with the issuance of the Prior Bonds and the financing of the Development, the Developer has heretofore entered into an Elderly Housing Interest Reduction Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1985 (the "Interest Reduction Agreement "), with the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "Authority "). The obligations of the Developer under the Interest Reduction Agreement are secured by a Combination Mortgage, Security Agreement, Assignment of Rents and Fixture Financing Statement, dated as of October 1, 1985 (the "Authority Mortgage "), from the Developer to the Authority. 1.8. Pursuant to covenants and restrictions entered into in connection with the Prior Bonds, the Development is required to be occupied for a specified period of time primarily by elderly persons and in part (at least 200) by persons and families of low and moderate income. 1.9. The construction and equipping of the Development have been completed, and the Development has been -2- partially leased. Initial leasing projections have not been met, however, and the Developer and the General Partner are in default under the loan documents securing the Prior Bonds. 1.10. This Council has received a proposal from the Developer that the City refinance the cost of the Development by issuing its refunding revenue bonds in one or more series (the "Bonds "), for the purpose of refunding and redeeming the outstanding Prior Bonds, in connection with a proposed amendment and assignment of the Mortgage Loan. 1.11. The City has heretofore caused to be prepared and has approved an amended program (the "Amended Program ") under the Act, pursuant to which it is proposed that the City issue the Bonds in one or more series and in a maximum aggregate,principal amount of $17,500,000 to refund and redeem the Prior Bonds in connection with the proposed amendment and assignment'of the Mortgage Loan and the refinancing of the Development. 1.12. The City has been advised by the Developer that conventional commercial financing is available to refinance capital costs of the Development only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the scope of the Development and the economic feasibility of operating the Development would be significantly affected, but with the aid of municipal financing the operation of the Development can be made more economically feasible. 1.13. The City has been advised by representatives of the Developer and Dain Bosworth Incorporated, of Minneapolis, Minnesota (the "Underwriter "), that on the "basis of information available to them and their discussions with the Developer and potential purchasers of bonds, the Bonds could be sold at favorable rates and terms to refund and redeem the Prior Bonds and refinance the Development. 1.14. The full faith and credit of the City will not be pledged to or responsible for the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds. 1.15. The City has received drafts of a Trust Indenture, a Financing Agreement and an Escrow Agreement (collectively, the "City Financing Documents "), a draft Bond Purchase Agreement (the "Bond Purchase Agreement "), and a draft Preliminary Official Statement (the "Preliminary Official Statement ") in connection with the proposed issuance and sale of the Bonds, and has caused such documents to be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. -3- 1.16. Pursuant.to notice duly published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City not less than 15 days prior to the date fixed therefor, this Council has held a public hearing on May 1, 1989, at which all interested persons were afforded an opportunity to express their views, in person or in writing, on the proposed issuance of the Bonds. This Council has carefully considered the views submitted at the public hearing. 1.17. It is hereby found, determined and declared as follows: (a) The Development will constitute a multifamily housing development under Section 462C.02, Subdivision 5 of the Act. The City is authorized to develop and finance the Amended Program by the authorization, issuance and sale of refunding revenue bonds or obligations payable solely from the revenues of the Amended Program and the Development. The purpose of the Development is and its effect will be to promote the public welfare and preserve the quality of life in the City by helping to maintain, provide and preserve adequate housing stock within the City and to assist persons of low and moderate income, or elderly persons, or both, to obtain decent, safe and sanitary housing within the City. (b) Based upon representations by the Developer and the General Partner, financing for the Development is not otherwise available to the Developer from private lenders upon terms and conditions which are affordable by the Developer, such financing being available only at a rate which, when combined with the cost of operating the Development as well as noneconomic factors, would impair the feasibility of the Development; the General Partner expects that the revenues to be produced by the rental of units in the Development will be sufficient to meet payments when due on the Mortgage Loan, as amended. 1.18. The findings and approvals contained in Sections 1 and 2 of the resolution adopted by this Council on April 17, 1989 with respect to the Development, the Amended Program and the Bonds, to the extent not inconsistent with the provisions of this resolution, are hereby confirmed. Section 2. `.pproval and Authorization. 2.1. This Council, being the "applicable elected representative" of the City within the meaning of Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue ,Code of 1986, as amended, hereby approves and authorizes the issuance of the Bonds upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. -4- 2.2. It is hereby determined that it is desirable for the City to proceed with the issuance of the Bonds in one or more series, in fully registered form, without coupons, in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $17,500,000, bearing interest at a rate per annum not to exceed 9.00% (except that the Subordinate Bonds, as defined hereinafter, may bear interest at a rate per annum not to exceed 12.00 %), maturing not later than December 1, 2030, and bearing the further terms and conditions set forth in the Trust Indenture heretofore filed with the City (as the same may be amended or completed as hereinafter provided); provided, that if the Bonds are to be issued in more than one series, the aggregate principal amount of Bonds, if any, which are not secured by the Mortgage Loan, as amended (the "Subordinate Bonds "), shall not exceed $1,600,000. Subject to the limitations set forth in this Section 2.2, authority is hereby delegated to the Mayor and the City Manager of the City, acting jointly, to determine the aggregate principal amount of Bonds of each series to be issued, the maturities thereof and the rate or rates of interest payable thereon. 2.3. The form of the Bond Purchase Agreement heretofore filed with the City is hereby approved, subject to such changes as may be deemed desirable by the Mayor, the City Manager and the City Attorney. The Mayor and the City Manager of the City are hereby authorized and directed, on behalf of the City,. to execute and deliver a bond purchase agreement in substantially the form of the Bond Purchase Agreement heretofore filed with the City, together with such changes and completions thereof as may be approved by the Mayor, the City Manager and the City Attorney, subject to the limitations contained in this resolution, the execution thereof to constitute conclusive evidence of the approval of such changes and completions. 2.4. Authority is hereby delegated to the Mayor and the City Manager of the City, acting jointly, to determine the aggregate purchase price of the Bonds, provided that the aggregate compensation to the Underwriter (whether in the form of a discount, fees or other compensation) shall not exceed an amount equal to 3.00% of the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds. 2.5. The forms of the City Financing Documents heretofore filed with the City are hereby approved. The Mayor and the City Manager of the City are hereby authorized and directed, on behalf of the City, to execute and deliver the City Financing Documents in substantially the forms hereby approved, but including such modifications, insertions and -5- additions as are necessary and appropriate in their opinion and in the opinion of the City Attorney and consistent with the Act. The execution of the City Financing Documents by the appropriate officers of the City shall be conclusive evidence of the approval thereof by the City. 2.6. The distribution of a preliminary official statement with respect to one or more series of the Bonds to prospective purchasers, in substantially the form of the Preliminary Official Statement heretofore filed with the City and with such changes, insertions, omissions and revisions as the Mayor, City.Manager and City Attorney shall deem advisable, and the use thereof by the Underwriter in connection with the offering of such Bonds, are hereby authorized and approved. The Mayor is authorized to permit the distribution of the final official statement in substantially the form of the Preliminary Official Statement, with such changes, omissions, insertions and revisions as the Mayor, the City Manager and the City Attorney shall deem advisable. 2.7. The Mayor and the City Manager of the City are authorized and directed to prepare and execute the Bonds and to deliver them to the trustee pursuant to the Trust Indenture for authentication and delivery to the purchasers thereof, together with a certified copy of this resolution and other documents required by the Trust Indenture. As provided in the Trust Indenture, the Bonds shall be executed by the manual or facsimile signatures of the Mayor and City Manager and impressed with the seal of the City or a facsimile thereof and shall be authenticated by the trustee, as authenticating agent, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.55, Subdivision 1. 2.8. As provided in the Trust Indenture, the Bonds are special, limited obligations of the City. Principal of, premium, if any, and interest on-the Bonds are payable solely out of the revenues derived from the sources described in the granting clauses of the Trust Indenture. Neither the State of Minnesota nor the County of Hennepin shall in any event be liable for the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds or for the performance of any pledge, mortgage, obligation-or agreement of any kind whatsoever that may be undertaken by the City. Neither the Bonds nor any of the agreements or obligations of the City contained in the City Financing Documents shall be construed to constitute an indebtedness of the State of Minnesota, the,County of Hennepin or the City, within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory provisions whatsoever, nor to constitute or give rise to a pecuniary liability or be a charge against the general credit or taxing power of the State of Minnesota, the County of Hennepin or the City. aM. 2.9. The Mayor, the City Manager and the City Clerk of the City are authorized and directed to,prepare and furnish to bond counsel and the Underwriter certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City relating to the Bonds, and such other affidavits and certificates as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality of the Bonds as such facts appear from the books and records in the officers' custody and control or as otherwise known to them; and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall constitute representations of the City as to the truth of all statements contained therein. 2.10. The Mayor and the City Manager of the City are hereby authorized to execute such additional agreements, documents and certificates in connection with the Bonds as may be necessary and appropriate in their opinion and in the opinion of the City Attorney and consistent with the Act. Copies of such additional agreements, documents and certificates, when executed, shall be delivered, filed and recorded as provided therein. 2.11. To evidence the exercise of the authority delegated to the Mayor and City Manager of the City by this resolution, the Mayor and City Manager are hereby directed to execute and file with the trustee named in the Trust Indenture a certificate setting forth the determinations made by them pursuant to the authority granted in this resolution, which certificate shall constitute conclusive evidence of the proper exercise by them of such authority. 2.12. The approvals hereby given to the various documents referred to above includes approval of such additional details therein as may be necessary and appropriate and such modifications thereof, deletions therefrom and additions thereto as may be approved by the City Attorney and by the Mayor and the City Manager authorized herein to execute said documents prior to their execution; and the Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized to approve said changes on behalf of the City. The execution of any instrument by the appropriate officer or officers of the City herein authorized shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents in accordance with the terms hereof. In the absence of the Mayor or the City Manager,'the documents authorized by this resolution to be executed may be executed by the Acting Mayor or the Assistant City Manager. 2.13. Notwithstanding the approvals and authorizations contained in Section 2 of this resolution, however, the City retains the right to withdraw from participation and accordingly not to issue the Bonds if (i) the -7- i Y Developer or any partner of the Developer fails to provide indemnification to the City, in form and substance satisfactory to the City, in connection with the issuance and sale of the Bonds and the refunding and redemption of the Prior Bonds, or (ii) the Developer fails to provide a mortgagee's policy of title insurance with respect to the Authority Mortgage in form and substance satisfactory to the Authority. 2.14. The approvals hereby given to the various documents referred to above supersede the provisions of Section 2.6 of the resolution heretofore adopted by this Council. on April 17, 1989 relating to the Development and the Bonds. Attest: (SEAL) Adopted this 1st day of May, 1989. Mayor City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and.the following voted against the same: whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. -8- 10 CERTIFICATE I, the undersigned, being the Executive Director of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota' (the HRA), hereby certify that I am the recording officer for the HRA and that attached hereto is a true and correct copy of a resolution entitled "Resolution Relating to the Edina Park Plaza Project; Approving the Refinancing Thereof and Authorizing the Execution of Documents in Connection Therewith ", adopted by the Board of Commissioners of the HRA at a meeting duly called and held by the Board of Commissioners on May 1, 1989. WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer this day of , 1989. 1 Gordon Hughes, Executive Director '1 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE EDINA PARK PLAZA PROJECT; APPROVING THE REFINANCING THEREOF AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH BE IT-RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the Authority), as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. Pursuant to a Trust Indenture, dated as of October 1, 1985, between the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City ") and First Bank National Association (formerly known as First National Bank of Minneapolis), as trustee (the "Prior Bonds Trustee "), the City has heretofore issued and_sold its Housing Development Revenue Bonds (FHA Insured Mortgage Loan - Edina Park Plaza Project), Series 1985 (the "Prior Bonds "), in the original aggregate principal amount of $17,622,800. The Prior Bonds are presently outstanding in the aggregate principal amount of approximately $17,345,000.- 1.02. Proceeds of the Prior Bonds were used to fund a mortgage loan (the "Mortgage Loan ") to Edina Park Plaza Associates Limited Partnership, an Illinois limited partnership (the "Developer ") and a supplemental loan to Partners for Senior Communities, Inc.,'an Illinois corporation and a general partner of the Developer (the "General Partner "), for the . purpose of acquiring, constructing and equipping an approximately 203 -unit multifamily housing development and functionally related and subordinate facilities located at 7800 York Avenue in the City (the "Development "). 1.03. The Mortgage Loan, which is evidenced by a mortgage note secured by a first mortgage lien on the Development under a Mortgage, dated as of October 1, 1985 (the "FHA Mortgage ") from the Developer to the Prior Bonds Trustee, has been.endorsed for mortgage loan insurance by the Federal Housing Administration of the United States Department of Housing and'Urban Development, and the Mortgage'Loan is presently outstanding in the principal amount of approximately $14,600,000. 1.04. In connection with the financing of the Development, the Authority has heretofore executed and delivered the following documents: (a) the Deed and Covenants Running With the Land, dated as of October 1, 1985 (the "Deed "),. from the Authority to the Developer; (b) the Elderly Housing Interest Reduction Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1985 (the "Interest Reduction Agreement "), between the Authority and the Developer; (c) the Escrow Agreement, dated as of October 22, 1985 (the "Escrow Agreement "), between the City, the Authority, the Prior Bonds Trustee, Title Services, Inc, and the Developer; and (d) the Combination Mortgage, Security Agreement, Assignment of Rents and Fixture Financing Statement, dated as of October 1, 1985 (the "Authority Mortgage "), from the Developer to the Authority. The Deed, the Interest Reduction Agreement, the Escrow Agreement and the Authority Mortgage are herein referred to collectively as the "Authority Documents 1.05. Under the Interest Reduction Agreement, the Authority has agreed to use tax increment derived from the tax increment financing district established by the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan and investment income thereon to lend certain amounts (the "Interest Advances ") to the Developer from time to time to pay interest on the Mortgage Loan. Under Section 1(b) of the Interest Reduction Agreement, the obligation of the Authority to make Interest Advances terminates upon an "Event of Termination," as defined therein, including a refunding or defeasance of the Prior Bonds initiated by the Developer. Upon an Event of Termination, Section 4 of the Interest Reduction'Agreement requires the Developer to repay certain amounts to the Authority. The obligations of the Developer under the Interest Reduction Agreement are secured by the Authority Mortgage, which is subordinate and junior to the FHA Mortgage. 1.06. The construction and equipping of the Development has been completed, and the Development has been partially leased. Initial leasing projections, have not been met, however, and the Developer and the General Partner are in default under the loan documents securing the Prior Bonds. 1.07. The Developer has requested that the City issue its Housing Development Refunding Revenue Bonds (FHA Insured Mortgage Loan - Edina Park Plaza Project) (the "Bonds "), in one or more series, to refund and redeem the outstanding Prior Bonds and refinance the Development. 1.08. In connection with the refunding of the Prior Bonds, the Developer has requested that the terms of the -2- Mortgage Loan and the FHA Mortgage be amended and assigned to the trustee for the Bonds. The amendments to the Mortgage Loan and the FHA Mortgage may result in an increase in the principal amount of the Mortgage Loan and /or a reduction in the interest rate thereon. Such increase, if any, in the outstanding principal amount of the Mortgage Loan may be evidenced by a supplement or amendment to the Mortgage Loan and the FHA Mortgage or by a supplemental mortgage loan and.related mortgage (such supplement, amendment or supplemental mortgage loan and related mortgage being referred to herein as the "Amendments "). The Developer will remain the owner of the Development following the proposed refinancing, and the Development is to remain subject to the FHA Mortgage, as amended by the Amendments, and to the covenants and restrictions (including those in the Deed) heretofore entered in connection with the Prior Bonds. 1.09. The Developer has requested that the Authority consent to the refunding of the Prior Bonds and to the Amendments. The Developer has further requested that the Authority consent to certain amendments to the Interest Reduction Agreement and the other Authority Documents for the purposes, among others, of ensuring that the refunding of the Prior Bonds will not give rise to an Event of Termination and that the lien of the FHA Mortgage, as amended by the Amendments, will remain prior to that of the Authority Mortgage. To this end, there have been prepared and filed with the Authority drafts of a First Amendment to Interest Reduction Agreement and a Consent and Subordination Agreement (collectively, the "Authority Amending Documents "). Section 2. Approvals. 2.01. The proposed refunding of the Prior Bonds, the proposed Amendments and assignment of the Mortgage Loan and the FHA Mortgage, and the transactions described in Section 1 of this resolution in connection with the refinancing of the Development are hereby approved, subject to the terms, conditions and limitations set forth in this resolution; provided, however, that the outstanding principal amount of the Mortgage Loan, as amended by the Amendments, shall not exceed $16,000,000: 2.02. The Authority Amending Documents are hereby approved in the form heretofore submitted to the Authority, with such additions, completions, changes and deletions as may be deemed necessary or appropriate by the, officers of the Authority executing the same and subject to the approval of counsel to the Authority. -3- 2.03. Notwithstanding the approvals contained in Section 2 of this resolution, however, the Authority retains the right to withdraw from participation and accordingly to refuse to consent to the Amendments if the Developer fails to provide a mortgagee's policy of title insurance with respect to the Authority Mortgage in form and substance satisfactory to the Authority. Section 3. Authorizations. 3.01. Any two officers of the Authority are hereby authorized to execute and deliver the Authority Amending Documents in substantially the form heretofore submitted to the Authority, with such additions, completions, changes and deletions as such officers may consider necessary or appropriate, together with such additional documents, agreements and certificates as the officers executing the same may consider necessary or appropriate to effectuate the proposed refunding of the Prior Bonds and the related transactions described herein. Such documents, agreements and certificates shall be in form and content approved by the officers of the Authority executing the same and counsel to the Authority, and the execution by such officers of the Authority of any such documents, agreements and certificates shall be conclusive evidence of their approval. Adopted this 1st day of May, 1989. Attest: Executive Director (SEAL) �E Chairman The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. ME CONSENT AND SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City ") has heretofore issued its Housing Development Revenue Bonds (FHA Insured Mortgage Loan - Edina Park Plaza Project), Series 1985 (the "Prior Bonds ") to finance the acquisition, construction and equipping of a multifamily housing development (the "Development ") located in the City; and WHEREAS, in connection with the issuance of the Prior Bonds, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "Authority ") agreed to lend certain amounts to the owner of the Development (the "Developer "), and the Developer's obligations in connection with said loan are secured by a Combination Mortgage, Security Agreement, Assignment of Rents and Fixture Financing Statement, dated as of October 1, 1985 (the "Authority Mortgage "); and WHEREAS, the mortgage loan made from proceeds of the Prior Bonds with respect to the Development (the "Mortgage Loan ") is secured by a mortgage which has been endorsed for mortgage loan insurance by the Federal Housing Administration of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (the "FHA Mortgage "); and WHEREAS, the City proposes to issue its Housing Development Refunding Revenue Bonds (FHA Insured Mortgage Loan - Edina Park Plaza Project) in one or more series (the "Refunding Bonds ") to refund and redeem the outstanding portion of the Prior Bonds; and WHEREAS, in connection with the issuance of the Refunding Bonds, the Developer has proposed that the Mortgage Loan and the FHA Mortgage be amended in form heretofore submitted to and reviewed by the Authority, and that the Mortgage Loan and the FHA Mortgage, as so amended, be assigned to the trustee "for the Refunding Bonds; NOW, THEREFORE, the Authority, by its duly authorized undersigned officers, hereby agrees and acknowledges as follows: 1. The Authority hereby consents.to the issuance of the Refunding Bonds, to the amendment of the Mortgage Loan and the FHA Mortgage and to the assignment of the Mortgage Loan and the FHA Mortgage to the trustee for the Refunding Bonds in connection with the issuance of the Refunding Bonds. 2. The lien of the FHA Mortgage, as so amended, with respect to the Development shall be prior and superior to the lien of the Authority Mortgage. Dated: 1989. THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By Its And Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On the day of 1989, before me, the undersigned, appeared and , who, acknowledged themselves to be the and , respectively, of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, and that they, as such officers, being authorized to do so, executed the foregoing instrument on behalf of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my notarial seal the day and year last above written. Notary Public (SEAL) , My commission expires: FIRST AMENDMENT TO ELDERLY HOUSING INTEREST REDUCTION AGREEMENT THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO ELDERLY HOUSING INTEREST REDUCTION AGREEMENT, dated-as of May 1, 1989, (the "First Amendment "), by and between the HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a public body corporate and politic of the State of Minnesota (the "HRA), and EDINA PARK PLAZA ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, an Illinois Limited Partnership (the "Developer "). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the HRA and the Developer have entered into an Elderly Housing Interest REduction Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1985 (the "Interest Reduction Agreement "), pursuant to which the HRA is obligated to make certain advances to the Developer to pay interest on the Housing Development Revenue Bonds (FHA Insured Mortgage Loan - Edina Prior Park Plaza Project) dated as of October 1, 1985 (the "Prior Bonds "), ,issued by the City of Edina, Minnesota; WHEREAS, the Developer has requested that the City refund the Prior Bonds through the issuance by the City of its [insert title of Refunding Bonds] (the . "Refunding Bonds "), pursuant to Trust Indenture, dated as of 1, 1989 (the "Refunding Bonds Indenture ") between the City and First Trust National Association, a national banking association, as trustee (the "Refunding Bonds Trustee "); WHEREAS, simultaneously with the issuance of the Refunding Bonds the City and the Developer will enter into a Financing Agreement, or other similar Agreement (the "Refunding Bonds Financing AGreement"), pursuant to which the City will loan to the Developer the net proceeds received by the City from the sale of the Refunding Bonds, which proceeds will be applied to refund to Prior Bonds; WHEREAS, in connection with the issuance of the Refunding Bonds the Project Mortgage, as defined_ in the Interest Reduction Agreement, will be amended and assigned to the Refunding Bonds Trustee; WHEREAS, the Developer has requested that the HRA agree that the issuance of the Refunding Bonds not constitute. an "Event of Termination, as defined in the Interest Reduction Agreement, and that for such purpose this First Amendment is being entered into; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties agree as follows: 1. Definitions. Any capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning given to them in the Interest Reduction Agreement. 2. Refunding of Prior Bonds Not Event of Termination. The HRA agrees that the refunding of the Prior Bonds by the issuance of the Refunding Bonds shall not constitute an Event .of Termination under the Interest Reduction Agreement. This agreement by_the City does not extend to any subsequent event which constitutes an Event of Termination under the Interest Reduction Agreement or impair any right the HRA may have upon the occurrence thereof. 3. Amendment of Terms in Interest Reduction Agreement. Upon the issuance of the Refunding Bonds all references in the Interest - Reduction Agreement to (i) "Bonds" shall mean the Refunding Bonds; (ii) "Indenture" shall mean the Refunding Bonds Indenture; (iii) "Trustee" shall mean the Refunding Bonds Trustee; (iv) "Financing Agreement" shall mean the Refunding Bonds Financing Agreement; (v) "Indebtedness" shall mean the Loan to the Developer of the net proceeds received from the sale of the Refunding Bonds; (vi) "Project Mortgage" shall mean the Project Mortgage as amended and assigned in connection with the issuance of the Refunding Bonds. 4. Consent of Guarantors and Refunding Bonds. This First Amendment shall not be effective until there have been delivered by the Developer the HRA consents from all of the individuals who have executed the Guaranty in the form of Exhibit A hereto; and a consent from the Refunding Bonds Trustee in the form of Exhibit B hereto. 5. Counterparts. This First Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed as original, and it shall not be necessary in making proof of this Agreement to produce or account for more than one such counterpart. 6., Law Governing. This First Amendment shall be construed in accordance with _and governed by the L a_ws of the State of Minnesota. 7. Severability. The provisions of this First Amendment are severable and if any of its provisions, sentences, clauses or.paragraphs shall be held unconstitutional, contrary to statute, exceeding the authority of the HRA or otherwise illegal or inoperative by any court of -2- competent jurisdiction, the decision of such court shall not affect, impair of render unenforceable any of the remaining provisions, nor affect or impair the application of such provision, sentence, clause, or paragraph to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it shall be held illegal or inoperative. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the HRA and the Developer have caused this Agreement to be executed in their respective names, as of the date first above written. HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By Its By Its EDINA PARK PLAZA ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By Partners for Senior Communities, Inc., the general partner of Edina Park Plaza Associates Limited Partnership By Henry Hyatt Its Executive Vice President Approved: FEDERAL HOUSING ADMINISTRATION By Its Authorized Agent -3- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 198_, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared and , to me personally known, who being by me duly sworn, did,say that they are the and , respectively, of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, and that said instrument was signed on behalf of said municipal corporation by authority of its governing body, and that said and .acknowledge said instrument to be the free act and deed of said Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota. (SEAL) Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) On this day of , 198_, before me appeared Henry Hyatt, to me personally known, who, being by me duly sworn, did say that he is the Executive Vice President of Partners for Senior Communities, Inc., an Illinois corporation, the gener -al partner of Edina Park Plaza Associates Limited Partnership, -an Illinois limited partnership, and said Henry Hyatt acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of Partners for Senior Communities, Inc., as the general partner of Edina Park Plaza Associates Limited Partnership. (SEAL) Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY -OF- HENNEPIN ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 198_, by , the authorized agent of the FEDERAL HOUSING ADMINISTRATION, on behalf of the Administration. (SEAL) Notary Public -4- EXHIBIT A FORM OF CONSENT OF GUARANTOR The undersigned has executed and delivered to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA ") a Guaranty (the "Guaranty ") dated as of October, 1985, guaranteeing certain obligations of Edina Park Plaza Associates Limited Partnership, an Illinois Limited Partnership (the "Developer "), under an Elderly Housing Interest Reduction Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1985 (the "Agreement ") between the HRA and Developer. The undersigned has been informed that the Developer and the HRA will enter into a First Amendment to Elderly Housing Interest Reduction Agreement (the "Amendment ") in the from attached hereto, which Amendment amends the Agreement. The undersigned has reviewed the Amendment and consents to the execution and delivery thereof by the HRA and Developer and acknowledges that the Amendment does not in any manner affect the Guaranty or release the undersigned therefrom and that the undersigned continues to be liable thereunder to pay and perform pursuant thereto and the Agreement, as amended by the Amendment, and the Second Mortgage (as defined in the Guaranty). Dated: STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) this Name Address: The fo_r_egoin_g_ instrument__ was __acknowledged__befo_r_e__me.__ day of , 1989, by -5- Notary Public EXHIBIT B CONSENT AND AGREEMENT The undersigned, the Refunding Bonds Trustee in the Refunding Bonds Indenture identified in the foregoing First Amendment to Elderly Housing Interest Reduction Agreement (the Amendment ") to which this Consent and Agreement is attached, hereby agrees to receive and disburse the Interest Advances pursuant to the provisions of the Elderly Housing Interest Reduction Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1985, between the Housing and REdevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota and Edina Park Plaza Associates Limited Partnership, as amended by the Amendment. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Consent and Agreement has been duly.executed by the undersigned as of 1, 1989. First Trust National Association By Its And Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) as Trustee The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 198_, by and the and , respectively, of the First Trust National Association, a national banking association, on behalf of said First Trust National Association. -- -- - Notary_ Public - - - - -- -- -- - - -- - (SEAL) -6- O ei t� Cl) 0 • `NC�RPORp`��O/ ieee PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, John Moynihan has z eAved the chitdhen and stab b o b the Edina. Schootz bon 39 yeatus - -as -teachers bah two yeatus and then as P)ti.ncipat ob Concord and Creek VaUey schooLs .since 1952; and WHEREAS, he has Zovingty touched the ti.ve,s ob more than 4,000 eeementary student6; and WHEREAS, he anganized the opening ob Creek Vat tey Schoot in 1969 and hab wo,%ked with panewt groups ob, that community bor .twenty yeatus; and WHEREAS, he has served as unobbic i.at h.i�s-ton i.an to Edina Schootz; and WHEREAS, John, hi%s wi4e, Pf-onence, thei)L bamity ob eight chitdnen, and a growing numbers ob grandchitdnen have been stettar community membejus; and WHEREAS, he "beUevez in Edina" and has atwayz been an ardent booster ob the City. NOW, THEREFORE, I, PredeAi.ck S. Richards, hereby pnoctaim May 24, 1989, as JOHN MOVNIHAN DAV in the City ob Edina, Minnesota, and on beha 4 ob att the citizens expuzz ours .s.cncene appnec c.ati.on to him bon hi.,s unset6ish and dedicated .aenvice to thin community. PROCLAIMED thi6 ]at day ob May, 1989. ayor Replaces and upgrades a 1977 grass fire slide -in unit. The new unit has a larger water tank, is more flexible in use and provides better performance. We intend on using this unit for car fires in the increasing number of parking ramps in the City, particularly Southdale Center and Centennial Lakes. Specification were sent to seven companies located in Minnesota, South Dakota and W sconsin. A company in Duluth that has constructed other, like units so expressed interest, but chose not to bid. ` 1 FIRE Signature Department The Recommended bid is within budget not within budget hn W Ilin, Fir Kenneth Rosland City Manager Director ° 0, REQUEST FOR PURCHASE 'RO.rewn• . TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Ted Paulfranz, Fire Chief VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager . SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE April 11, 1989 AGENDA ITEM .I.y-A ITEM DESCRIPTION: Grass Fire Fighting Slide -In Unit Company state Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Custom Fire WI 1. $12,945 2. Pierce Fire Apparatus WI No Bid 3 -D Fire Apparatus WI 2. No Bid (sent letter) %• Minnesota Warner HN 3. No Bid 4. Luverne Fire Apparatus SD No Bid Clarey Fire MN 4• No Bid 5 - General Safety Equipment MN 5. No Bid Gibson - MN No Bid RECOMMENDED QU9TE OR BID: Custom Fire - -- $12,945 GENERAL INFORMATION: 1989 Grass Fire Fighting Slide -In Unit Replaces and upgrades a 1977 grass fire slide -in unit. The new unit has a larger water tank, is more flexible in use and provides better performance. We intend on using this unit for car fires in the increasing number of parking ramps in the City, particularly Southdale Center and Centennial Lakes. Specification were sent to seven companies located in Minnesota, South Dakota and W sconsin. A company in Duluth that has constructed other, like units so expressed interest, but chose not to bid. ` 1 FIRE Signature Department The Recommended bid is within budget not within budget hn W Ilin, Fir Kenneth Rosland City Manager Director 1 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: April 27, 1989 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Ted Paulfranz, Fire Chie SUBJECT: ATTACHMENT -- GRASS FIRE FIGHTING SLIDE IN UNIT CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. IV -A The purpose of this memo is to provide additional information on this grass "fire fighting slide -in unit ". 1. Grass Fire Experience Grass fires are reported within the classification of "grass, rubbish, brush fires (outside of buildings) ". Over the past several years, we have experienced a steady increase in such fires: 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 31 26 45 54 66 69 I also feel that the danger from "grass" fires is increasing, as construction continues in areas of close exposure to ponds, woodlands and dense natural vegetation. 2. Parking Ramps Our design on this grass fighting unit has been.to develop a dual - purpose vehicle that could also serve all needs for access into parking ramps for car fires. We presently have approximately 1 million square feet of ramp parking and plans to construct an additional 1.5 million square feet. Such ramps do not permit access for full -size fire equipment, with both weight and height restrictions. Car fires are typically extinguished with less than 200 gallons of water. This design will provide a low profile vehicle that can serve this need. 3. Replacement Unit This grass slide -in unit replaces an older, smaller design that does not meet present needs in water storage and pumping capacity. TRP /ras i 0�ef-i' REQUEST FOR P URCHASE TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Ted Paulfranz, Fire Chief VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE April 27, 1989 AGENDA ITEM Iv .B ITEM DESCRIPTION: 5000 PSI BREATHING AIR COMPRESSOR Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1• Compressed Air and Equipment Company 1. $23,359 2. Metropolitan Fire Equipment 2. $21,990 3. 3 4. 4 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Compressed Air and Equipment Company for $22,809 (See cost description attached GENERAL INFORMATION: " See Attached Signature I U The Recommended bid is within budget not FTRF Dwartment I Won, Finan¢j� Director Kenneth Rosland City Manager COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. IV.B ATTACHMENT: BREATHING AIR COMPRESSOR -- 5000 PSI Two bids were received on this unit; 1) Compressed Air and Equipment Company; 2) Metropolitan Fire Equipment. Both are within our budgeted estimates of $23,000. The low bid, Metropolitan Fire Equipment, made 14 departures from our specifications. The following four are of special concern: 1. Maintenance and Service Our specifications called for a local service center, with 24 -hour emergency service, parts in a reasonable time, and two years of service experience. Metropolitan Fire does not have a service center, has very limited parts and an unacceptable history of service. We talked with several local fire departments who purchased compressors from Metropolitan Fire. They experienced extremely long "down times" while waiting for service, and subsequently had to ship compressors out of state for repairs. I have discussed this with the owner of Metropolitan Fire, and he agrees that he cannot provide this level of service. This is a very important feature in the purchase of this specialized equipment. We need qualified people readily available to answer questions, provide parts and service. Compressed Air and Equipment Company meets our specifications. They have a local service center, 3 maintenance people on call, a full range of parts and can provide a loaner if necessary. Our research did not identify any complaints with their service and repairs. 2. Enclosed Cabinet and Sound Proofing These compressors are working at high pressure and are quite loud. Our specifications called for full enclosure and soundproofing. The design of Metropolitan Fire's unit is unacceptable, because it is subject to physical damage and is without provision for sound control. Optional sound insulation on Metropolitan Fire's unit is available at additional cost. 3. Filter Change Warning The quality of the breathing air is the most important element in the compressor system design. Our specifications called for a warning device when filter change was needed. No such warning is provided with the Metropolitan Fire unit. Filter change is based on hours of usage and left to the operator's judgment. The Compressed Air and Equipment Company's unit meets our specifications with suitable automatic warning devices. 4. Pressure Settings - Fill Pressure Air tanks are filled to different pressure levels, based on their design. The Compressed Air and Equipment Company unit provides a fixed pressure setting, improves safety in operation, and eliminates the chance of over - pressurization. The Metropolitan Fire unit does not provide such a feature. If ATTACHMENT: BREATHING AIR COMPRESSOR -- 5000 PSI PAGE 2 OF 2 In addition, the Metropolitan Fire bid is not directly comparable because of differences and omissions between the proposals. The following cost summary more accurately reflects the differences: Cost Comparison: COMPRESSED AIR METROPOLITAN FIRE Compressor $21,475 $20,990 Air Test Equipment $ 1,884 $ 11000 Outside Air (included) 209 (est. cost) 25 ft. Filler Hose (included) 200 (est. cost) -------- - - - - -- ----------------- Total: $23,359 $22,399 Deduct for Cascade Filling Feature 550 (not available) GRAND TOTAL: $22,809 $22,399 After consideration of strengths and weaknesses in these two proposals, I recommend the Compressed Air and Equipment.Company bid at $22,809. TRP /ras M REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CEIL SMITH VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager. SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR. PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: MAY 1, 1989 AGENDA ITEM _iv. c ITEM DESCRIPTION: PUBLIC OFFICIALS LIABILITY INSURANCE - Company CITY couNCIL�xRA Amount of Quote or Bid 1. National Union (HRA, City Council combined) 1. $ 18,000.00 2. National Casualty - City Council 2. $ 10,500.00 3. National Casualty - HRA 3. $ 4,575.00 4.. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: National Casualty - $15,075.00 for Council and HRA GENERAL INFORMATION: These quotations are for coverage of $1,000,000.00 per loss and $1,000,000.00 annual aggregate. This is a $5,000.00 retention. National Casualty.premium quotation reflects no change from last years permium paid by the City for the same level of coverage. Agent: Bill Homeyer, Harris - Homeyer Public Officials Liability Insurance is written by a limited number of companies, hence the limited number of bids (3). zj �Y1 Signature The Recommended bid is VV - — within budget not Administration Department Wallin, Fjhance Director Kenneth Rosland, City Manager \\ 01 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CEIL SMITH VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000 DATE: MAY 1, 1989 AGENDA ITEM IV. D ITEM DESCRIPTION: POLICE PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. WEST WORLD 1. $ 33,990.00 2. NATIONAL CASUALTY 2. $ 24,753.00 3. 3_ 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: NATIONAL CASUALTY - $24,753.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: These quotations are based on coverage in the amount of 500,000 each occurance, 500,000 annual aggregate, and a $10,000 deductible Agent: Bill Homeyer,. Harris - Homeyer Police Professional Liability Insurance is written by a limited number of companies, hence the limited number of bids (2). Signature) ?'' Administration Department The Recommended bid is within budget not within�budgef hrryVallin, Fina ce Director Kenneth Rosland, City Manage 1rTA.:lI � ° REQUEST FOR PURCHASE �:; TO: Mayor Fred Richards and Council Members FROM:Bob Kojetin, Director, Edina Park and Recreation VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000 DATE: April 27, 1989 AGENDA ITEM IV. E ITEM DESCRIPTION: Removal of dead /diseased trees on public land. Companv Amount of Quote or Bid 1• Precision Landscape & Tree 1. $8.11 /dbh 2. Outside Services, Inc. 2. $8.50 /dbh 3• Ceres Tree Co. $ . $9.34 /dbh 4• Asplundh Tree Expert Co. 4, $10.65 /dbh 5• Budget Stump Removal 5. $15.00 /dbh RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Precision Lnadscape & Tree at $8.11 per diameter at breast height GENERAL INFORMATION: Removal of dead /diseased trees at various locations within the city on public lands.. Total work is not to exceed $14,000. i Sig�naVtul The Recommended bid is within budget not Department allin, FinAce Director Kenneth Rosland, City Manager 01 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor Fred Richards and Council members FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director, Edina Park and Recreation VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000 DATE: April 27, 1989 AGENDA ITEM IV.F ITEM DESCRIPTION: Tree stump removal at various locations in the city. _Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1• Outside Services, Inc. 1. $1.75 /in. 2' Precision Landscape & Tree, Inc. 2. 3. $1.81 /in. Budget Stump Removal 3. 4• $1.87 /in.. Ceres Tree Co. 4. 5. $1.90 /in. Asplundh Tree Expert 5. $2.10 /in. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Outside Services, Inc. at $1.75 /in. GENERAL INFORMATION: Grind /remove stumps left by tree removals on public lands in Edina. The total work is not to exceed $9,000. Sig ure v Department The Recommended bid is X within budget not withi ( L get n Wallin, finance Director Kenneth Rosland, City Manager A �1 o e `= to Cn 0 iV �tv/ �Re M REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To Ken Rosland From: Janet Chandler l; Recycling Commission Date: May 1, 1989 Subject: City -Wide Recycling Contract Recommendation: Agenda Item # -v-a . Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Motion to approve: issuance of a letter of intent to contract with BFI for city -wide recycling collection, effective July 1, 1989 through December 31, 1990. * provision of a recycling container for each household, to be supplied by the contractor that- recyclables be placed by the garage,,visible from the street, for Info /Background: collection. On April 17, Council approved the.selection of BFI and Waste Management for final recycling contract consideration. Further discussions were held between City Staff and the contractors; and final proposals were received on April 25. The Recycling Commission met on .April 26 to discuss the proposals and make their- recommendations. Enclosures: Report from Staff and Recycling Commission Final proposals from BFI and Waste Management r RECYCLING COMMISSION AND STAFF REPORT CHOICE OF CONTRACTOR After reviewing the final proposals, the Recycling Commission and Staff agree that the proposal from BFI has the most advantages for the City. The considerations in reaching this decision were that BFI has: * Assurance of market for paper, despite current oversupply problems * Reduced costs from previous proposal * Pledged to provide same day garbage and recycling service for their customers (approximately 65% of Edina households) * Plans to institute volume -based fees for garbage service on June 1, with a fee structure that will encourage recycling, composting and waste reduction. Waste Management's position also changed from the previous proposal to the extent that they would require a contract provision stating that in the event there is a charge to dispose of paper, the City would pay that charge. In the current market situation, that charge would apply. Other options were suggested; namely, to delay the start of the program, or start the program without picking up paper. We believe it is preferable to start the full program by the July 1 target date. CONTAINERS The recommendation is that the contractor provide a container for each household. Recycling containers have promotional and practical functions and are an important part of successful programs. A sample container with optional lid and wheels has been on display at City Hall, and. has generally met with more favorable comments than any other type. The cost of containers can be spread out over the 18 month contract period, with funding available from Hennepin County at $5 per household. LEVEL OF SERVICE The Recycling Commission and Staff recommend that the recycling service point be by the garage (or side of the house), visible from the street. In reaching this conclusion, the concerns of convenience, pickup efficiency, neighborhood appearance, and cost were taken into consideration. We believe most residents would find this to be acceptable. ' 1 Recycling Report, page 2 ORDINANCES At a future Council meeting, ordinances will be presented to address the following: * definition of "recyclables" * anti - scavenging * placement of recyclables Council may wish to consider requiring that all trash haulers, as a condition of licensing, be required to charge volume based fees. ACTIONS RECOMMENDED Motion to approve: * issuance of a letter of intent to contract with BFI for city -wide recycling collection, effective July 1, 1989 through December 31, 1990. * provision of a recycling container for each household, to be supplied by the contractor. * that recyclables be placed by the garage (or side of the house) visible from the street or alley, for collection. Recycling Report, page 3 MONTHLY COST BY LEVEL OF SERVICE PROVIDED CURBSIDE CURBSIDE, BY GARAGE ORD. 0711 RETURN TO VISIBLE FROM GARAGE STREET BFI $20,175.11 $25,385.90 $32,734.00 $471#164.33 (per household) $ 1.51 $ 1.90 $ 2.45 $ 3.53 WASTE MANAGEMENT $18,571.00 $23,916.00 $32,734.00 $35,407.00 (per household) $ 1.39 $ 1.79 $ 2.45 $ 2.65 WASTE MANAGEMENT WOULD ALSO REQUIRE A CONTRACT PROVISION STATING THAT IN THE EVENT THERE IS A CHARGE TO DISPOSE OF PAPER, THE CITY WOULD PAY THAT CHARGE. AS OF TODAY THAT CHARGE WOULD APPLY. CONTAINERS CAN BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR, WITH THE PAYMENTS EXTENDED OVER THE 18 MONTH CONTRACT PERIOD. THE CONTAINER RECOMMENDED BY THE RECYCLING COMM. WOULD BE AVAILABLE AT APPROXIMATELY 50 CENTS PER MONTH PER HOUSEHOLD. BUDGET PROJECTIONS CITY -WI DE COLLECTION CONTRACT, JULY 1 START, CONTAINERS INCLUDED 1989 JAN -DEC CURBSIDE CURBSIDE, BY GARDE ORD. +711 RETURN CON. & VISIBLE BFI PROPOSAL ($1.51) ($1.90) ($2.45) ($3.53) COSTS CONTRACT COST $121,051 $152,315 $1960407 $282,986 CONTAINER COST $ 40,500 $ 40,500 $ 40,500 $ 40,500 PRESENT PROGRAM $ 70.000 $ 70.000 $ 70.000 $ 70.000 TOTAL COST $321,551 $262,815 $306,907 $3930486 INCOME HENNEPIN COUNTY COLLECTION REIMS. $ 96,841 $121,852 $157,126 $226,389 CONTAINER REIMS. $ 22,500 $ 22,500 $ 22,500 $ 22,500 RECYCLING CENTER $4,QQO $ 34.000 $ 34.000 $ 34,000 TOTAL INCOME $153,341 $178,352 $213,626 $282,889 NET COST $ 78,210 $ 84,463 $ 93,281 $110,597 ( BUDGETED FOR 1989, $ 74,588) 1990 COLLECTION CONTRACT + CONTAINER COST + PAYROLL ($20,000), NO INCOME FROM CENTER NET COST $104,420 $116,926 $134,563 $169,194 F � Recycled paper 0� 1 Recycling systems TM BROWNING- FERRIS INDUSTRIES Minneapolis District April 25, 1989 Ms. Janet Chandler Recycling Coordinator City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Janet: During our meeting of April 21, 1989, you requested clarification on several parts of our proposal. Please find below additional information on those points. 1) Price of Services Curbside Ordinance #711 By garage visible from street Curbside container returned to garage Containers Edina owns containers at end of contract. $1.51 per home, per month no additional tonnage charge $3.53 per home, per month no additional tonnage charge $2.45 per home, per month no additional tonnage charge $1.90 per home, per month no additional tonnage charge $ .50 per home, per month includes distribution 2) Commitment to Same,Day Refuse and Recycling Service Currently, BFI provides over 65% of the Edina homes with residential refuse service. BFI Recycling Systems of Minnesota, Inc. will structure the recycling routes to ensure that recycling collection occurs on the same day as refuse collection. This "same day" collection will increase participation and reduce any confusion on the part of the residents. BFI will commit to making changes in the refuse collection schedule to accommodate the recycling program. 3) Volume Based Fees Volume based fees will be implemented to provide incentives to BFI 8661 RENDOVA STREET,- CIRCLE PINES, MINNESOTA 55014 • (612) 784 -3262 Ms. Janet Chandler �. residential customers June 1, residential ture: 1 Can Limit 2 Can Limit Unlimited -2- April 25, 1989 to participate in the recycling program. As of refuse rates will be offered on a three tier struc- It is anticipated that there will be a minimum $2.00 difference between each. level of service. To be eligible for the 1 can rate, it will be necessary that the resident participate in the recycling program. BFI Recycling Systems of Minnesota, Inc. will coordinate with Woodlake Sanitary Service, Inc. /BFI to verify that all 1 -can customers do partic- ipate in the recycling program at minimum once per month. Volume based fees are the most important and effective way to promote recycling. Yard waste collection will continue to be. provided as part of the residential refuse service. There will be no extra charge for this service. 4) Market Situation - Guaranteed Pickup Although the market of newspaper is very volatile at this time, BFI Recycling Systems of Minnesota, Inc. can guarantee collection of all items specified in the RFP. BFI Recycling Systems has contracted markets for newspaper in the Twin Cities. 5) Containers As specified in the Price of Services, BFI Recycling Systems of Minne- sota, Inc. can provide recycling containers to the City of Edina. The container used for this proposal is the Buckhorn 20 gallon container. BFI Recycling Systems will buy and distribute these containers as part of the recycling contract. There will be a charge of $.50 per home, per month. At the end of the contract, Edina will own the containers. BFI will coordinate with the City to have "hot stamps" on the containers of either a City emblem or motto - "Edina Recycles ", etc. 6) Bar Code System. BFI Recycling Systems of Minnesota, Inc. is currently working with Tursso Companies /Vertical Systems, Inc. on a bar code system for recycling programs. This system has been refined and is working very well in' Blaine, Minnesota. Besides providing participation and operational information, the system is very effective as a marketing tool. Using the Community Recycling Management System (CRMS) it is possible to identify those areas of the City in which participation is low. Flyers or brochures can be distrib- uted in this area and the results of the promotional efforts can be monitored. This prevents the expense of blanket mailings. The CRMS option is very flexible and can be added to the program at a later date if desired. BFI Recycling Systems of Minnesota, Inc. will work with the City to "tailor make" this program to fit Edina's specific needs. • 1, . Ms. Janet Chandler -3- April 25, 1989 7) Holiday Policy BFI Recycling Systems will adhere to any holiday policy requested by the City. Currently, it is planned to maintain the same holiday schedule as Woodlake Sanitary Service, Inc. /BFI, the residential refuse collection company. If the holiday occurs on a week day, refuse and recycling collection will be the following work day. BFI Recycling Systems will provide all residents with the collection schedule and policy to ensure that there is no confusion between pickups. 8) Problem Solving As stated in the RFP, BFI Recycling Systems of Minnesota, Inc-. has a full time office to handle any calls from the Edina residents. Any calls regarding complaints or missed pickups will be logged and reviewed with the City on a weekly basis. If a missed pickup is called in before 12:00 p.m., it will be picked up on the same day. If the call is re- ceived later, collection will be made before 12:00 p.m. the following day. 9) Promotion BFI Recycling Systems of Minnesota, Inc. will work with Edina to develop a comprehensive promotional program to encourage participation in the recycling program. This program will include, but not be limited to: - Brochures - Press Releases ' - Newspaper Ads Every Six Months - Recycling Updates - Presentations to Schools and Civic Groups - Program "Kick -Off" Ceremony BFI Recycling Systems will work with Edina to develop a video to be shown on the cable channel. There will be an ongoing effort to find effective ways to promote the program - T- Shirts, buttons, contests, etc. BFI Recycling Systems of Minnesota, Inc. looks forward to the opportunity to serve the recycling needs of the City of Edina. Sincerely, ,Jo�hnft re 1�a�n District Manager JM /njo Mr. Gordon Hughes Ms. Janet Chandler City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. - Edina, MN 55424 Dear Janet and Gordon: Minnesota Area Office Post Office Box 9 Circle Pines, MN 55014 Phone: (612)784 -8349 April 24, 1989 Thank you for meeting with me and Mike Berkopec to discuss our recycling proposal for the City of Edina. As you requested, I am enclosing a written summary of our discussion. I am also enclosing a pricing schedule that reflects the option of requiring that recyclables be by the garage but visible from the street. In the summary, I have tried to tackle the thorny issue of market risk. We realize that this is a topic of concern for you, but we are confident that together we will be able to resolve this to everyone's satisfaction. The more we learn about Edina, the more enthusiastic we become about your recycling program. Thank you for your time and consideration.. Sincerely, Ly n Morgan Program Development Manager LM/ j m Enclosure cc: Mike Berkopec Printed on recycled paper sk WASTE MANAGEMENT.OF NORTH AMERICA CITY OF EDINA 04/26/89 A. Base Proposal - Unlimited tonnage - Collection at the garage or rear of premises, per ordinance #711. $35,407 per month B. Curbside Proposal - Unlimited tonnage - Collection at curb; resident transports container to and from roadway. $18,571 per month C. Curbside Proposal with Container Return - Unlimited tonnage - Resident transports recyclables to the curb; driver returns empty container to the garage area. $23,916 per month D. Garage Area Collection - Unlimited tonnage - Residents place recyclables at the garage so .that they are visible from the street. $32,734 per month E. Container Option We encourage the City to incorporate a specialized recycling container into its program. Containers will _boost participation, increase convenience for residents, reduce litter, and help drivers recognize recyclables, thereby reducing missed pick -ups. Containers can be incorporated into alternatives A, B, C, or D at a minimal monthly cost. Printed on recycled paper. I' �; E. Container Option (continued) We would purchase and deliver the containers, but the City of Edina would own them. Waste Management would provide financing so that the City would not have large start -up expenditures. Instead, the City would pay 20% of the container purchase price over each of the first five years of the contract. If the contract ended or were not renewed after fewer than five years, the City would pay a lump sum equivalent to the balance remaining. In any case, the containers would be the property of the City. Discussion Summary Friday, May 21, 1989 Will service costs change if containers are provided? No. Our costs assume that someone -- the City, Waste Management, or the residents -- is providing a container. Will costs change if implementation is delayed? No, but we require a minimum contract period of 18 months. How much do recycling containers cost, and when could they be delivered? Shamrock makes a 23.5 - gallon container and would extend Waste Management's discount to the City. Each container is $8. Lids are available for an additional $2.50 and wheels for $4 a set. Rehrig Pacific makes an 18.25 - gallon container. Pricing would be confirmed at the time of order, but would be roughly $6.12 per container (plus freight). In both cases, company representatives report . that the containers can be delivered by June 19th if they are ordered by'May 5, 1989. Can Waste Management think of a way to provide recycling service on the same day as garbage service: Yes. The City could designate garbage collection days that correspond with recycling collection days. Haulers could collect garbage within a given area only on the day specified by ordinance. Can Waste Management guarantee that recyclables will be collected regardless of market conditions? When Waste Mangement undertakes a recycling program, it is with the under- standing that collection is guaranteed. To make that commitment, we require that our contracts with municipalities reflect the changing realities of markets for recyclables. We will make every effort to secure reliable, profitable markets for Edina's recyclables. Our contract should specify, however, that in the event there is a charge for disposing of recyclables at a recycling market or waste disposal facility, the charge will be incurred by the City and not the contractor. Which materials will be collected? How should they be prepared? Newspapers: Bagged /bundled; glossy inserts removed. Glass containers: Rinsed, with metal lids and neckrings removed. Waste Management will separate by color. Primed on recycled paper. Tin, aluminum, bi -metal and steel beverage and food containers: Rinsed. Waste Management will sort by type. Can Waste Management service the City recycling center? Yes. We may provide different containers, however. Can you offer a bar code system? We can add a verification system, such as bar code system, if the City desires. The cost will depend upon your specific requiremnts. How will missed pick -ups be handled? Residents will be encouraged to report service problems by calling Waste Management. Our phones are answered 24 hours a day. In the event our driver missed a pick -up, we will collect those recyclables no later than 5 p.m. the next day. Any other promotion ideas? We will host a Recycling Rally to kick off recycling collection. We would also like to present a tree to the City in honor of each 1,000 tons recycled by City residents. We would be happy to cooperate in the City's promotional efforts. Any suggestions regarding the contract? The City may wish to write a renewable contract for greater flexibility. REPORT /RECOMMENDATION IBBB To: Mayor and City Council From: Bob Kojetin, Director Park & Recreation Dept. Date: April 27, 1989 Subject: Park and Facility Names Recommendation: Agenda Item # v.c Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Bill Jenkins MOVED THAT WE CALL ONE ICE SURFACE "EAST" AND ONE ICE SURFACE "WEST" UNDER THE SAME NAME "BRAEMAR ARENA ". Jim Fee seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Info /Background: Mr. Larry Thayer indicated at the time of the Arena re- construction, he wanted to get rid of the second -class citizen connotation of the "pavilion ". Braemar Arena has not been re- named; it is still "Braemar Arena" with the west ice and the east ice for scheduling purposes. The 1988 -89 Edina Hockey Association season participants knew the two ice sheets as east and west. They seem to have accepted the east and west reference. EDINA PARK BOARD 7:30 p.m. April 11, 1989 Edina City Hall MEMBERS PRESENT: Bob Christianson, Bill Jenkins, Jim Fee, Jean Rydell, Mac Thayer, Don Wineberg, Pat Vagnoni MEMBERS ABSENT: Bill Lord, Andrew Montgomery, Scott Johnson STAFF PRESENT: Bob Kojetin, John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Larry Thayer, John Valliere, Bill Bach, Stacey Kness OTHERS PRESENT: Peter Warner, Sylvia Eisler, Madeline Habighorst Bob Christianson called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. and welcomed new board member, Pat Vagnoni. Mr. Christianson explained the first meeting of March is the election for chair and vice chair, since there was not a meeting in March the elections will be held now. He then turned the elections over to Mr. Kojetin. Mr. Kojetin opened the floor for nominations for chairperson. Don Wineberg MOVED TO RE -ELECT BOB CHRISTIANSON AS CHAIRPERSON. Bill Jenkins seconded the motion. Mr. Kojetin closed the nominations. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Kojetin opened the floor for nominations for vice - chairperson. Jean Rydell MOVED TO NOMINATE DON WINEBERG FOR VICE- CHAIRPERSON. Jim Fee seconded the motion. Mr. Kojetin closed the nominations. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Kojetin turned the meeting back over to Mr. Christianson. 1. APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY 14, 1989, MEETING MINUTES Jean Rydell MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 14, 1989, MEETING. Mac Thayer seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. 2. ICE SKATING RINK AND WARMING HOUSE FACILITIES Mr. Kojetin introduced Mr. Peter Warner, 4445 Fondell Drive, a neighbor of Cornelia School Park. Mr. Warner submitted a petition signed by 31 neighbors "interested in having the warming house at Cornelia upgraded to the type of facility in existence at Normandale Park or Strachauer Park" including a permanent shelter building, restrooms, and drinking fountain. According to Mr. Warner, the park gets a lot of use by skaters in the winter, and soccer and football players use the park in the summer. Mr. Warner asked the Park Board to consider the neighbors' request. Mr. Wineberg indicated the Park and Recreation staff is looking at the future plan of all the parks. He asked what the staff's recommendations for the future of Cornelia School Park. Mr. Kojetin stated this was the first warming house in the City. The Park and Recreation Department received capital dollars to build warming houses on five of the 14 skating parks. Cornelia School was scheduled for upgrading, but the capital dollars went to a total repair of the tennis courts since there was not a demand for upgrading the warming house. - 1 3. Mr. Christianson stated at the present time all of the park facilities will be reviewed in the study the Park Board is currently conducting. It is premature at this point to decide if anything will be done. Mr. Kojetin concluded with the staff's recommendation that in our long range capital improvement plan Cornelia School warming house is in the budget for upgrading with total restroom and warming house features on a permanent basis. The question is when can it be done. SENIOR CITIZEN FEES Mr. Christianson referred to a letter he received from Madeline Habighorst requesting the Park Board to consider a senior citizen discount on season tickets at the Municipal Pool. Mrs. Habighorst feels seniors get a break just about everywhere. She mentioned the School District gives a 50 percent senior citizen discount on classes. Mr. Kojetin explained that the discount that the School District has been giving is 50 percent. At the present time their bridge classes cost $26. They give a.50 percent discount which would be $13 for a senior class. We give bridge lessons at the present time for $11 with no discount. So a person has to evaluate the particular class and what is 50 percent of what. Mr. MacHolda recapped how surrounding cities handle senior citizens at their public pools: Richfield no discount Bloomington 65+ free with proof of age St. Louis Park 50 percent off daily admission Crystal no discount Eden Prairie no discount Mr. MacHolda responded to a question of how a senior discount would impact the pool's revenue saying it would not have a large impact since the pool is primarily used by a younger crowd, and there are not many senior users. A concern was if the Municipal Pool established a discount for senior citizens, would it set a precedent for the other facilities? Braemar Golf Course has a lower rate for senior citizens all ready, but it does impact the revenue since there is extensive use by senior citizens. Mrs. Rydell asked Mrs. Habighorst if a 10 percent discount would encourage more seniors to use the swimming pool. Mrs. Habighorst said it would not. Mr. Kojetin said he would not recommend a discount. If a person feels there is a hardship, a person can apply for a scholarship through the Edina Foundation. Last year, there were applications for scholarship funds at the Municipal Pool and Edinborough Park pool which the Foundation funded. Mrs. Rydell asked Mr. MacHolda if the pool could be opened for lap swimming for free. Mr. MacHolda said no; it would have to be later in the evening or before 6 a.m. or eliminate an hour of open swimming. Mrs. Habighorst said she uses the pool every day. If there were more than a ten percent discount, it would bring more seniors. It was the staff's and Park Board's recommendation not to establish a senior citizen discount at the Municipal Pool. - 2 - 4. TEEN CENTER Mr. MacHolda gave some background.on the Teen Center. It was started in 1985 on a nine -month basis. It provided a safe place for teens on Friday nights. Its numbers were high the first few Fridays it was open. It has developed into a hangout for 12 to 20 kids who benefit from the development of relationships with peers and positive adult role models. The Teen Center Board is requesting $1000 to keep it going. The program proposed for the 1989 -90 school year is one night per month at South View Junior High and one night per month at Valley View Junior High. There would be major events such as tubing, concerts, bowling, -etc. Mr. MacHolda expressed the staff's opinion and recommended to wait for more information on another section of R.A.L.L.Y. (Recreation, Arts, Learning, and Leisure for Youth) called School Release Day and direct $1000 to this program since it is more recreation - oriented. Mr. MacHolda said the 12 to 20 kids who used the Teen Center regularly can be included in the Release Day program. Mr. Kojetin said the staff recommendation is not to fund the Teen Center. Mr. MacHolda will bring detailed information with an organizational chart to the Park Board probably in June. Jean Rydell MOVED THAT WE DO NOT FUND THE TEEN CENTER'S REQUESTED $1000 FOR THE 1989 -90 SCHOOL YEAR AT THIS TIME. Mac Thayer seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. PARK PLAN UPDATE Each of the three committees,reported as follows: Bob Christianson (Park and Open Space Acreage) - They are looking into the availability of space and will meet with someone at City Hall to see what kind of land is undeveloped. Bill Lord (Park Development) - Bob Kojetin reported the committee has gone through the park master plan once and has a short report on each park. The Park Board decided to let the staff and the committee continue with this process. Jean Rydell (Recreation Programming) - According to the School District, 75 percent of Edina's population are "empty- nesters ". Committee is considering a survey to see if there is an interest in developing some programs with other communities for younger adults and adults. Mr. Christianson asked the committees to prepare a written draft and to report in August. He explained the study plan to Pat Vagnoni and welcomed her to his committee. 6. NINE -HOLE GOLF COURSE PLAN UPDATE Mr. Kojetin gave some background on the nine -hole golf course plans: - We are submitting for permits from the Watershed District, Department of Natural Resources, and Corps of Engineers with the help of Barr Engineering. - We have met with the DNR. Their biggest concern is the amount of open water. - 3 - Hoping to start construction in the fall. The bonds were awarded at the past Council meeting for $2.1 million. Mr. Valliere reported on the status of construction going on this year at the golf course: Executive building - Construction is almost complete. . Tee construction - Architect has submitted plans for #12 tee: Work should start shortly. Tee oasis - Working on design and making them more defined Parking lot - Planning the design and lighting of a new parking lot. Also lighting would be included around the executive building, the clubhouse, and a front entrance sign. 7. EDINBOROUGH PARK Mr. Christianson received a letter written to the Mayor and City Council and Bill Bach. Mr. Bach reviewed the concerns and suggestions stated in the letter: - increased traffic volume at park when Hawthorne Suites and Centennial Lakes come-on line - too many pre - schoolers - appears unorganized. - abuse of park amenities - suggest increased security guards - suggest having groups check in with the office Last year, there were 204,000 people through the park. Mr. Bach indicated primary use of the park is pre - schoolers in the mornings, adults in the evening, and families on the weekends. Especially for Children, the day care center in Edinborough, works with the park staff in allowing only ten children at a time with leadership at certain low -peak times. However, other day care facilities bring large groups of children without advance notice. A park rule is children 12 and under have to have a parent in the park which brings the question of adult to children ratio. Mr. Kojetin indicated that some issues in the letter cannot be changed due to the nature and design of the park. Mr. Bach said the park is meeting its design projections and programming needs. The Park Board made some suggestions to minimize congestion and confusion at the tot lot area such as make signs requiring a certain ratio of children to adults and increase "policing" of tot lot. 8. PARK AND FACILITY NAMES Mr. Larry Thayer indicated at the time of the Arena re- construction, he wanted to get ,rid of the second class citizen connotation of the "pavilion ". Braemar Arena has not been re- named; it is still "Braemar Arena" with the west ice and the east ice for scheduling purposes. The 1988 -89 Edina Hockey Association season participants knew the two ice sheets as east and west. They seem to have accepted the east and west reference. Bill Jenkins MOVED THAT WE CALL ONE SURFACE "EAST" AND ONE ICE SURFACE "WEST" UNDER THE SAME NAME "BRAEMAR ARENA ". Jim Fee seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. - 4 - 9. OTHER City Council Liaison Mr: Christianson received a letter_ from the Council stating they have eliminated their liaison to each board. They wish to meet annually with each board on the third Monday of a chosen month at 6 p.m. starting June 19. The Park Board chose August 21 as their joint meeting date. Volunteer Recognition Reception Mr. Christianson reminded the park Board of the April 25 reception. Mr. Christianson, Jean Rydell, and Andrew Montgomery will attend. Senior Bus Program The program is running very smoothly. Van Valkenburg Park April 24 is the ground breaking for the fencing and building. The fencing should be completed by June 1, and the building should be completed by July 1. The strategy is to schedule future capital dollars to light one field per year at a total estimated cost of $100,000. Adult Softball Program The league is at its maximum with 127 teams this year. There are thirty teams currently on a waiting list. If all three fields were lit, a maximum of 96 teams per week could participate on the three fields. This would leave a few other teams using the ten fields that are now being used for all 127 tams. When Van Valkenburg is being used to its maximum, we would eliminate some of the ten fields and keep only a minimum number. May Park Board Meeting 'The May 9 Park Board meeting will be held at the Edina Art Center. The Art Center expansion proposal will be on the Park Board agenda in May and hopefully on the City Council agenda in June. Meeting adjourned 9:45 p.m. - 5 - 35,000 25,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 I City of Edina Edinborough Park 1988 Total Attendance ��o <y Doty Mot ��5� � �opet ,Oet ,�e< Jo F e� P eP�'e 0� NoJe pecett` S 1988 Total Attendance 204,252 Chart 1 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 I City of Edina Edinborough Park 1988 General Attendance m �sX- ee< ,�e� Jo Feb M P� eP�e� ocNo e� eae'� . S \-\O, O Commons Areas Only Chart 2 7,000 5,000 3, 000 2,000 1,000 a City of Edina Edinborough Park 1988 Cuura L lt l Attendance --I 5,793 5,749 4,813 4,660 4,470 4,147 3,725 3,765 3,664 3,076 3,019 2,982 X c,< 06 '(\ \ - �\e �\ C, sm P, S- ()C, 0, e O e C' 1988 Total Cultural Attendance 49,863 Chart 3 62.8% City of Edina Edinborough Park 1988 Athletic/Recreational Attendance 0% .2% Season Posses ■ Daily Posses E] Resident Posses Chart 4 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 City of Edina Edinborough Pork 1988 Athletic/Recreational Attendance +, ►��I, �'�II Ili . 'ail q. if P J q1t W. CX\ \e \.,\I 1, 0 loet 'Oe< Feb ()C, \-o-, e eoe IS Season Posses Daily Posses E] Resident Posses Chart 5 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 City of Edina Edinborough Pork All Attendance Compared GO Od C,\\ e e 60 00( Oe \'o,4 e o ec, General M Cultural 0 Recreational Chart 6 5,000 4,000 3,000 1,000 0 Fe City of Edina Edinborough Park 1988 Weekday /Weekend Comparison or P�� boy e oe< �,0e < 0et � ()c � NoJ o eoe K�` Weekday Total Weekend Total Chart 7 e,. 7606 York Ave. S, #7101 Edina, MN 55435 March 28, 1989 Edinborough Park Attn: Mr. Bill Bach, Park Manager 7700 York Ave. S Edina, MN 55435 Dear Mr. Bach: On Monday evening, March 27, my husband L.J. and I attended an informational meeting for Edinborough condominium homeowners about the projected suite -type hotel soon to be built on the remaining open land adjacent to Edinborough Park. We owners were informed that the hotel guests would be introduced to the park by easy accessibility and a window wall that would look into the park. This reminded us that there will soon be a higher traffic volume into the park and our area, not only by hotel guests but by the people who will live and work in the now developing Centennial Lakes area. We would like to voice our concern over present and future park usage, policies that should or will be set, and how at the present time what appears to be over usage or under - monitored usage by certain groups of visitors. On Tuesday morning, March 28, as I was leaving the swimming pool at 9 a.m., I stopped to again count the number of preschool youngsters on the basketball floor, although not as many as usual for that time of day had assembled. There were 11 children running aimlessly around while a "caretaker" sat on the platform casually observing them. It is not unusual during the day to see dozens of children in that area, 'throughout the park, with little supervision. I have never seen any of these children organized into games or learning activities. Nor, have I seen their caretakers make any attempt to educate them about the care that an indoor environment needs, or to instruct them in the nature of the various trees and plants that attempt to grow in that delicate eco system. Throughout the winter we noted buses and vans disgorge youngsters of all ages into the park, accompanied only by a disinterested adult driver. I asked park personnel on this Tuesday occasion if those were the day care youngsters who attended the day care facility in the Edinborough Plaza building. They replied that they have no way of knowing what groups come in to use (or abuse, my word) the park, as they don't have to register with them or pay a fee. " Edinborough Park Page 2 11arch 28, 1989 Ir During the past year that we have lived at Edinborough, we have enjoyed some of the many park functions. At the same time, we feel that the quality of "plant life" went "downhill." Out of sight of a "ranger" or "security person," youngsters would walk in the plants, play on the theater floor, try to climb trees, etc., some while accompanying adults were present. Should there also be an educational facet to the park environment itself to foster an appreciation of it and how it differs from the usual outside park? For groups, such as children who appear to be in day care groups, perhaps registration might be considered. Perhaps a user fee. An orientation session by a ranger could be held on their first field trip there, and the normal fee waived for the day of the orientation. Some of these groups that are brought in seem to dominate the basketball floor area and the toddler play area. The individual parent seeking to bring in a child for a few hours is greatly outnumbered. This letter is certainly not to criticize you, the present management of the park, nor any of the staff /security personnel. We have never found more pleasant, capable people in any public facility. We and the other taxpayers of Edina have a unique beginning and we would like to keep it the green jewel it was meant to be. Many of the people using the park, particularly the pool and track area, this past winter have not been from the Edina area. Upon asking, I heard such neighborhoods represented as Chaska, Shakopee, Lake Calhoun, downtown Minneapolis, St. Louis Park. One secretary from South St. Paul said she drives her youngster to the park "several times a week." It might be the majority of users have not had a vested interest in the park and they have not been as caring about the facilities as they might have been if their city had a financial stake in it. This has no doubt driven maintenance costs higher. One of the reasons given in the hotel presentation behind wanting to complete the Edinborough project now with a hotel was to gain additional base for park maintenance. By copy of this letter to Edina Mayor Frederick Richards and the city council, we hope to point out that we believe usage, proper financial support, should be rethought and provisions made now to maintain the beauty of the park when additional volume is added to an already heavy load. Sincerely al Lola Popken i cc:. Mayor Frederick Richards and the Edina City Council SENIOR CITIZEN FEES BRAEMAR ARENA General Skating No Discount Skate Rental No Discount Ice Rental No Discount Ice Frolics Dress Rehearsal No Fee BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 18 Holes $1 Cart $2 Pro Shop No Grill No *Seniors must be residents, patri play golf or use the cart Monday EDINBOROUGH PARK Daily Pass Individual Pass Family Pass Facility Rentals Off Off Discount Discount on card holders and must through Friday. No Discount No Discount No Discount No Discount "A A e V �eee REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Francis J. Hoffma�� City Engineer Date: 28 April, 1989 Subject: Petition - France Ave. Property Owner at 4711 Meadow Rd. 0 Recommendation: Agenda Item # V.D. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA KI To Council Action K Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Authorize staff to continue negotiations with property owner if policy decision is made to participate with property owner and Hennepin County on this request. Info /Background: The attached petition reviewed by staff and the following conclusions were reached: A. The existing condition has been long standing and property owner requests "correction" during this construction project. B. The portion of the request that involves creating a retaining wall be considered for inclusion in project if County concurs. C. The portion of the request that involves creating a privacy wall or sight barrier be assessed to the property owner if property owner agrees. D. The maintenance of the wall needs to be documented for future owners of property through an agreement. The staff will present a more detailed report Monday evening. We have been unable to discuss more detail with property owner due to death in family. PETITION TO: THE HONORABLE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA: The undersigned owners of the property at 4711 Meadow Road, which abuts France Avenue at the rear, hereby petition for recommended wall to retain fill on the right -of -way of France Avenue to curb level.at the rear of the property. This would correct and complete the previous improvement of France Avenue and reasonably protect the above - described premises in the following manner: 1. To prevent the present inadequate and steeply sloped west shoulder of France Avenue from further eroding against the existing private fence and into the yard at the rear of 4711 Meadow Road; 2. To prevent the accumulation in the crevice (ditch) of street -swept sand, paper, bottles, cans, and other dan- gerous and unsightly debris which the steep slope makes extremely difficult, if not impossible, for the home- owners or city to control or remove; 3. To prevent further damage to homeowners' existing privacy fence by plowed, frozen salt, sand, and ice over the steep shoulder through and under the fence into the yard at the rear of 4711 Meadow Road; 4. To eliminate the dangerous crevice created by the un- completed shoulder slope against the homeowners' existing fence that was reasonably necessary to screen the yard from noise, dirt, and street traffic of over 14,000 vehicles daily. (This is the shortest, furthest below - grade backyard on the block due to the curve of Meadow Road and required front setback); and 5. To prevent the piling and accumulation of heavy plowed and melting snow in the crevice against the fence and to prevent heavy slush (plowed at high speed) from continu- ing to strike and knock down sections of the existing private fence. For the portion of the requested retaining wall which is necessary to: (1) permit creation (by fill) of a normal shoulder sloping toward the street at a typical (1/2 inch per foot) incline to permit gutter dispersal of melting snow and heavy rainfall, and (2) create a buffer to.catch and retain the plowed snow and slush, we request payment from the state highway or Edina general road funds as an uncompleted, inadequate prior highway or street im- provement. We request, and would willingly pay a reasonably appro- priate portion of the additional cost of, an extension (to the approximate existing fence height) of the retaining wall above the 3 feet or 4 feet probably necessary to catch and accumulate the snow, slush, and debris plowed or swept from the street-. (We understand that rear yard-and side yard improvements which have some special benefit are sometimes assessed at one -third of actual cost.) This extension of the retaining wall to a height about equal to the height of our existing 6 foot fence has some public benefits. It would permit a capping of the area between the top of the existing fence and the top of the retaining wall for safety purposes. The retaining wall of equal height to the fence would avoid creation of a "step" situation from the retaining wall to the existing fence. Similar height would also help preserve the continuity of the existing fence line with similar rear yard screening fences all along this block -long entry way to the 50th and France area. Importantly, it would.provide some protection from the increased nighttime bus and truck travel in the abutting southbound lane where parking will now be banned incident to the new France Avenue plan. - 2 - The requested extension of the proposed retaining wall could be easily accomplished with 2 to 3 foot longer posts-and the addition of 2 to 3 feet of the same or similar but lighter fence boards between the tops of the extended posts. CONCLUSION We have, to the best of our ability, through the diffi- cult and expensive (5 inch x 6 inch - 18 foot creosoted posts and two tier white cedar stockade) fencing on our property, created a reasonably aesthetic resolution of the improper slope problem and proximity to this heavily traveled highway. This, with the guard- rail to help prevent recurrence of the two incidents of house damage from vehicles accidentally coming down the slope, has taken care of part of the slope problem. The additional safety, im- provement of street and boulevard maintenance, and protection of our existing fence, which would be created by a level shoulder to eliminate the drop at least to the property line, seems well within your scope of review at this time and is an appropriate public improvement. The only time this can be economically and feasibly constructed with anchors under the street is now when this major reconstruction has been undertaken. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Kat ryn S (5hmi IPV941 L.),r See, PHOTOS (7) and following enclosures: Survey, 4711 Meadow Road Plat, 4700 Block Aerial Photo, 4700 Block FA �� Connor Schmid 4711 Meadow Road Edina, Minnesota (Lot 11, White Oaks 5th Addn.) 922 -4711 - 3 - April 14,1989 N Scale: 111=20' 7415 WAYZATA BLYO. + A ?OL15 +MIN ESOTA Survey for COINER F I SCHMI D a5t o-f9t PiCke-r 1 �� <fRocx WALLS O p V LU 1 t. 0 1 II 0 b b 1 Sea' 1 AIJ I VJ 11 �a > L lJ N V 2 i 2c.4S I LL CF Rod cn I;,,e 5.4 • .`(all ay ground level 03 ever _ r �T p cf wall 0.6 Clear / N DESCRIPTION: tot 11, WHITE OAKS 5TH ADDITION W of e hereby certify that this is a true and correct reoresentation of a survey of the boundaries land above described and of the location of all buildings, if any, thcreon, and all Visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. Dated this 18th of ju1,, , 1973 , E G A N, F I E L D & N O W A K, INC. I Surveyors File M0, 3779 BOOk MO. 2010 -39 by �.� ter. ,.,•.�(..:`� l r Garage N t Rcc-F34 over G,v �ll•4% •�;..` it � Y• se 4711 �rti rn t. 0 1 II 0 b b 1 Sea' 1 AIJ I VJ 11 �a > L lJ N V 2 i 2c.4S I LL CF Rod cn I;,,e 5.4 • .`(all ay ground level 03 ever _ r �T p cf wall 0.6 Clear / N DESCRIPTION: tot 11, WHITE OAKS 5TH ADDITION W of e hereby certify that this is a true and correct reoresentation of a survey of the boundaries land above described and of the location of all buildings, if any, thcreon, and all Visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. Dated this 18th of ju1,, , 1973 , E G A N, F I E L D & N O W A K, INC. I Surveyors File M0, 3779 BOOk MO. 2010 -39 by �.� ter. ,.,•.�(..:`� l r 0 IS 1 4�IH 5I LL) .o mot' n 60 oi Iaa� .7 ®3 (z5) e OW rt V' (41) (36) J� 1 . J. I 9 7 09 `'L_._� _.. ' (39 ) � � e (62) I (15) '0. .......... 701 W ra w 15 75 e5 140 40 . . (16 ) J I. I _ I —; t. C to 0 4,71 t--O 124,71- Z (27) 16.9s . �\I -- a 192 71q) (60) (64) (28) � It (19) (65) I II . S I r r pl ,� (30 ) '9 v I. 717 (66) (3�) '0. .......... 701 W ra w 15 75 e5 140 40 . ~ ISd I. I STORM SEWER DISTRICT BOUNDARY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOUNDARY -RSHED DISTRICT BOUNDARY 'EMENT BOUNDARY re KENNEPIN COUN(Y, MINNESOTA BUREAU OF PUBLIC SERVICE DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAX AND PUBLIC RECORDS SURVEY DIVISION Oat, -tom -d 7 J 73— x-1,- - X l/ Id /w. A/I CYO a F- 4 7 erg. q� 45 F)qv,(7e. Ave S'o- 4(- 7 -7 � 7 T Fr a e? C-1- 41 a, 7ff, rroVLU F-fewe {� �,. � _ -�. _ _ _ � �U_� Fib' z.��e '�!►° q�r1A. e "` tA Cn • V • � ~�bRPOMt °v • lees REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER From: JOHN SHIRMANG, BUILDING OFFICIAL Date: APRIL 28, 1989 Subject: UPDATE - WHITE OAKS LOTS Recommendation: Info /Background: Agenda Item # V _ R Consent ❑ Information Only 0 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ - Discussion As you are aware, Andron has applied for a building permit to construct a single family home on Lot 1, White Oaks 3rd Addition, Lot 9, White Oakes 2nd Addition. Data submitted with the application included the required site plan, grading /fill plan, storm water analysis and information on setbacks along Townes Road used to determine front yard setback. At that time staff requested additional information which Andron sent on April 17 per the attached letter. Several issues still are unresolved as listed in my letter dated April 28, 1989:; which must be addressed prior to issuance of a permit. , a or CITY pF EDINA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 612- 927 -8861 April 28, 1989 Andron Design Development Corporation 5808 Garden Avenue Edina, MN 55436 Re: Lot 1, White Oaks 3rd Addition, Lot 9, White Oaks 2nd Addition Dear Mr. Andron: Thank you for the information you sent on April 17, 1989 regarding the above referenced property. Some of our departments have questions that need to be answered. Please address the following: 1. The required.front street setback is 51.4 feet. This average was determined using the information provided by your surveyor. The corner lot at Bridge and Townes Road is not used for the calculation. The front yard of that lot is adjacent to Bridge Lane. The 16 foot setback your surveyor lists is a side street setback. 2. The proposed build -up building pad encroaches into the area protected by an easement. This area should remain undisturbed. 3. Preliminary review of the engineer's report indicates that an occasional problem with road flooding on the east side could occur. Indicate how this problem may be mitigated. Additionally, protective drainage ease- ments would be necessary to prevent additional filling. Sincerely,. J n Schirmang Building Official JS /jh F0 A. 10 4'r ' i \y�Aedu �S�v/ REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Ken Rosland From: Janet Chandler Date: May 1, 1989 Subject: Solid Waste Legislation Recommendation: Agenda Item # y. F . Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council' Action ❑ Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Resolution to contact legislators and express opposition to proposed solid waste legislation. Info /Background: A proposed state -wide sales tax on refuse collection services would have an inequitable effect on Hennepin County and its municipalities. An estimated $15 million would go from Hennepin County into a fund to support recycling programs. However,'under the proposed formula, only $3 million would be returned to Hennepin County.' ' Enclosures: Letter from Carl Michaud, Hennepin Co. Recycling Coordinator Resolution of the Hennepin County Board Report adopted by the Minneapolis City Council 2 BUREAU OF PUBLIC SERVICE A -2309 Government Center HENNEPIN Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487 -0239 HLl Phone (612) 348 -6509 April 13, 1989 T0: Recyling Coordinators The purpose of this letter is to inform you about proposed solid waste legislation currently under consideration at the Capitol. You may be aware of the Recommendations of the Governor's Select Committee on Recycling and the Environment (SCORE). These recommendations were shaped into legislation which has many excellent features that will promote recycling and yard waste composting in the state. However, the SCORE bill in the House also calls for a 6% sales tax on refuse collection services; the Senate bill calls for a 4% sales tax. The money would be used to pay for the state's recycling programs and for grants and loans to counties. This tax places a tremendous inequity on Hennepin County residents and businesses. At 6 %, Hennepin County residents and businesses will contribute about $15 million to the fund but only receive about $3 million back in grants in the 1990 -91 biennium. Hennepin County and municipalities will be penalized because we have begun aggressive programs to reduce our reliance on landfills while other counties who have not taken action will be rewarded. Such a generous subsidy to the state and other counties for their recycling and composting programs will affect Hennepin Ccunty's ability to pay for its own recycling and composting program. The County prefers a tax or fee on a cubic yard or tonnage basis on solid waste going to a disposal facility as a way to fund the state's programs. This will be more equitable for everyone and generate sufficient funds to pay for the state's programs. Please inform your city mayor and city council members about the adverse impacts of this legislation on Hennepin County. We suggest that they contact their state senator and representatives immediately to oppose the proposed taxing mechanism and suggest the alternative. Enclosed are copies of resolutions passed by the Hennepin County Board and the Minneapolis City Council opposing a sales tax on solid waste collection and disposal services. If you have questions, call me at 348 -3054. Sincerely, q , / �&J Carl Michaud Recycling Coordinator Enclosure HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer . t 00328 RESOLUTION NO. 89 -3 -232 The following resolution was offered by Commissioners Andrew and Keefe: WHEREAS, H.F. 417 and S.F. 371 incorporate recommendations of the Governor's Select Committee on Recycling and the Environment which proposes extending the sales tax to solid waste collection and disposal services; and WHEREAS, The purpose of the Waste Abatement tax is to fund County recycling programs and statewide education, promotion and market development programs; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County has internalized all of its costs for solid waste management consistent with state and regional guidelines which includes a mechanism for long -term funding of recycling programs; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County will contribute $12 million more in the next biennium through the Waste Abatement tax into the solid waste reduction and recycling account than it would receive; and WHEREAS, The exemption to the tax leaves significant loopholes for waste haulers to avoid the tax, BE IT RESOLVED, That Hennepin County opposes extension of the sales tax to solid waste collection and disposal services, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That before any county can receive state funds, an internal funding mechanism for recycling must be present; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Chairs of the Intergovernmental Committee communicate the concerns in this resolution to the County delegation at the Legislature. The question was on the adoption of the resolution and there were Six YEAS and No NAYS as follows: COUNTY OF HENNEPIN BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Randy Johnson John Keefe John E. Derus Tad Jude Sam S. Sivanich Mark Andrew Jeff Spartz, Chairman RESOLUTION ADOPTED. ATTEST: GLc� r Clerk bf e County�Buard YEA NAY OTHER X T 'A=T T T _ T _ X _ MAR 1 4 1989 t Al The IKTER60YERKMEKTAL RELATIOKS Committee submitted the following reports: IGR•- Your Committee recommends that the City Council go on record in support of many of the provisions of the Select Committee on Recycling and Environment (SCORE) Report with the following exceptions and qualifiers: 1. The City opposes sales taxes on collection and disposal. 2. Any funding distribution formula must be equitable statewide. 3. Before any county can receive state funds, it must have set up an internal funding mechanism for recycling. 4. Any reference to volume or weight based fees should clearly include the City's variable fee. 5. Program design should be left to the local unit of government as much as possible. Scallon moved that the above report be divided and that the subject matter of paragraph 1 be acted upon separately. Seconded. Upon a voice vote, the Chair declared the motion lost. Dziedzic and Scallon, at their request, recorded as voting "Yea ". Question being on adoption of the above report, upon a voice vote, the Chair declared the report adopted. Scallon, at his request, recorded as declining to vote. Passed February 24, 1989. Approved March 2, 1989. Donald M. Fraser, Mayor. Attest: Merry Keefe, City Clerk. oe `�` kA N J �� o \�N�bRPOANZ�v� as REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: COUNCIL MEMBERS Agenda Item # _V.G From: MAYOR RICHARDS Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: APRIL 27, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: QUARTERLY COUNCIL ❑ To Council STUDY SESSIONS Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Info /Background: At the Council Meeting of April 3, 1989 we considered the following dates for our Council study sessions: June 17 September 16 December 16 There was :some discussion regarding the June date. We. should firm up these dates. o e� o •'^'�bRpo" �° • ass REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: KENNETH ROSLAND CITY MANAGER Date: MAY 1, 1989 Subject: PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF 1989 TEAMSTER'S LOCAL 320 CONTRACT Recommendation: Agenda Item # v.H Consent 0 Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Approve this proposal as presented by the parties. Info /Background: After several negotiation sessions, the following items represent a settlement, should the Council approve. 1. WAGES - 4% increase This is the same percentage of increase granted to other employees. 2.. HEALTH BENEFITS - An additional $10.00 per month contribution by the City for health insurance, which is the same increase granted to other employees. 3. OVERTIME - Employees who are scheduled to work 9 holidays, identified in the contract, shall receive an additional 1/2 time regular rate of pay for time worked. 4. Employees classified as investigators shall receive an additional $55.00 per month. 5. Employees classified or.assigned as a field training officer shall receive an additional $1.00 per hour to a maximum of $200.00 per month while performing the training function. r,�. 4� A. �1 oe�, a4 �o •'N�iJRPOM�bO • loss REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Francis Hoffman City Engineer �1 l� Date: 27 April, 1989 Subject: Vacation of a Portion of South Frontage Road on Vernon Avenue Recommendation: Agenda Item # V_ T. Consent 0 Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Set Hearing Date of May 15, 1989. Info /Background: This hearing is a part of the project involving the reconstruction of Link Road and Eden'Avenue in the Grandview Area. The attached exhibit shows the existing layout and the proposed land exchange with Superamerica to complete right -of -way exchanges. This construction project had been approved by Council earlier and was reconfirmed earlier this year. ~ � f oce \ \ QSIGN FOFN b, "•P � " q�F 3• V � EOINA SENIORS HOUSING Vernon Avenue yy�� OMH CB }� ®MH 1= 11. . US SMELTER C N W C � o 7 135 ON o 0 a / FILL R 0 GO VENT ` SUPERAYEAICA V JUNIPERS O PROPANE TANK 12 Sys Ce / \ Ce . ss \ @o < F frt ?O \ ?9� O� 't 9 \ +oa � y` \ 6 VGA \ n N OtN 6; 91 -D m m n CI7 S C J m CD = EXHIBIT A E � o I z / cr) 8 Lrl �Zlc AREA TO BE VACATED AREA TO BE ACQUIRED Agenda Item VI.A The Roseville Citizens Council for Fair and Open Government March 27, 1989 Mayor Fred Richards City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Richards: Recent actions by elected officials in Roseville have raised some concerns about the adequacy of enabling legislation for plan B cities. A citizens group has been formed and as chair of the legislative committee and former mayor of Roseville, I am seeking input an improvement of local government enabling statutes. Specifically, the following issues are now being researched for possible consideration as a special or plan B legislative amendment: 1. City Manager Hiring /Dismissal - present law only provides that if the manager is fired by-the City Council, the manager may request written charges and a public hearing. There may be a need to prescribe the conditions for dismissal and the process to be followed. The hearing process has some weaknesses. Most notably, in the absence of quidelines,, the hearing can degenerate in unsubstantiated name calling. Besides spelling out some guidelines, provision for requesting an independent convener should be provided.' It might also be appropriate to provide for arbitration in the event of a dispute. the plan B -form of government vests a great number of powers in the City Manager. The manager obviously must have the confidence and support of the Council to carry out these functions. It might be reasonable, therefore, to require (as in land use and zoning changes), that a 2/3 vote be required for hiring and dismissal. Finally, specific authority'.,may be given to the City Council to pay any City Manager legal`' fees that the Council determines to be appropriate. 2. Council Member Sanctions - present law states that council members may not publicly or privately direct staff except through the City Manager. However, no sanctions are provided nonprofit tax exempt P.O. Box 13879 Phone 887 -1976 Mayor Richards - page within the Plan B statute for violatinq that provision. Other provisions of the statutes may apply, but they should be directly applied to this situation. A law without sanctions leaves room for abuse. For example, the Open Meeting Law provides that three violations requires forfeiture of office. 3. Recall of Council Members - Present law only provides for filling vacancies created by resignation, health, residency, etc. Case law suggests that recall provisions can only apply to misfeasance and malfeasance in office as provided in other statutes. If that remains the only available option, the tving of removal to misfeasance or malfeasance may be an appropriate modification. 4. Ethical practices - Statutory provisions regarding conflict of interest are useful partial guidelines to elected official ethical behavior. Ho- wever, in a time of incr easing mistrust of public officials, some permission or encouragement or requirement for establishment of a local code of ethical conduct might warrant consideration. There are probably other Plan B amendments which are'of intere-..t to your community. That is the purpose of this letter. o Does your community have modifications to the plan B enabling legislation that warrant consideration? o Is your community interested in endorsing_ amendments to the statute along the lines presented above? o Would you oppose efforts to amend the law as outlined above? Thank you for your consideration of these issues. Si etely, Donn R. Wiski Chair Roseville Citizens Council Legislative Committee cc: City Manager, Kenneth Rosland -r o e Cn H�v �g , �o \RPOMS °v� lase REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item ## VIII.A From: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER Consent ❑ Information Only 7 Date: APRIL 27, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: AIRPORT ADEQUACY STUDY ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance 0 Discussion Recommendation: Info /Background: Attached is a letter from Larry Lee, Director of Community Development, City of Bloomington concerning Edina's participation in the review of the Metropolitan Council's Airport Adequacy Study. He is suggesting that.Edina appoint a representative to sit on a project management team that would meet one or two times per month. in ICity of it bioomington, minnesota Municipal Building • 2215 West Old Shakopee Road • Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 -3096 • (612) 881 -5811 April 20, 1989 Mr. Kenneth Rosland, City Manager City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Ken: I want to thank you for the City of Edina's decision to participate in a review of the Metropolitan Council's Airport Adequacy Study. A copy of the consultant request for proposals (enclosed) has been circulated to qualified firms. Proposals are due by May 5, with consultant selection scheduled by May 22. We hope to have the study complete by November 1. I have assumed that you will not want your staff involved in the consultant interviews and selection, but I hope Edina will appoint a representative to sit on a project management team w onth will an invoice or Edina's $5,000 financial participation when e consultant contract is executed in late May or early June. Since y, Since Le Director of Community Development /k enclosure AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION /EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Telecommunications Device for the Deaf: (612) 887 -9677 Request for Proposal Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airport Adequacy Study Sponsored By: City of Bloomington City of Richfield City of Bloomington City of Eden Prairie City of Edina R April.11, 1989 Request for Proposal MSP International Airport Adequacy Study April 989 Page BACKGROUND Two regional agencies, the Metropolitan Airports Commission and the Metropolitan Council, are currently involved in examination of and planning for international airport facility needs for the Minneapolis - St. Paul, Minnesota region. The Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC), a regional agency directed by Commissioners appointed by the Governor, is responsible for the operation and management of all public airport facilities in the seven - county metro- politan area, including Minneapolis - St. Paul (MSP) International Airport, located at Wold Chamberlain Field. MAC began an update of its Master Plan for MSP International Airport in 1985. After an initial work phase which included facility inventory and activity forecasts, the work was halted by MAC because of the pending merger of Northwest Airlines and Republic Airlines. In its 1987 Session, the Minnesota Legislature directed that study of the ability of MSP to serve the future air travel needs of the Twin Cities area proceed on two fronts. The Metropolitan Council was directed to examine the long -term (Year 2020) need. The Metropolitan Airports Commission was directed to determine airport needs over the next ten years .(Year 1998). Both studies were to be completed at the end of 1988. The City of Bloomington and the City of Richfield have joined together to conduct this third study of MSP Airport because of common concern regarding the future of the airport at this site. The Cities have three major con- cerns: o Relocation of the existing airport will result in loss of opportunity for economic growth for existing and future commercial and service businesses in the communities. o The impacts and benefits of the North -South runway alternative have not been fully addressed. o The impact on the metropolitan area of creating an additional growth center around a new airport have not been addressed. Request for Proposal MSP Internationa Airport Adequacy Study Apri 1 989 Page 2 Metropolitan Council Stud The Metropolitan Council's studyl/ examined Twin Cities airport needs over a thirty -year period. The analysis found that the existing airport faci- lity woul -d not adequately serve the demand expected during that period. The Metropolitan Council's study also examined the question of how. long the existing airport could accommodate expected demand and concluded that existing airport facilities will not satisfy the level of demand expected to occur at MSP by the Year 2000. The study found that to meet Year 2000 demand at MSP, an.additional (fourth) runway is needed. To meet Year 2020 demand, construction of another (fifth) runway would be required. The study concluded that the only alternative means of meeting future demand is construction of a new international airport. The Metropolitan Council study emphasized the potential negative effects associated with having inadequate airport facilities. The study pointed out the possibility that demand not served at MSP Airport would be likely to relocate to another city, and would probably not move back to the Twin Cities even if airport facilities were later expanded. As a result of this study, the Metropolitan Council has determined that planning for future airport needs should proceed on two tracks. o Capacity of the existing airport should be maximized. o Planning for a new airport should begin immediately, including site selection and landbanking. The Metropolitan Council recommended the two -track approach because the process required to site, plan, construct and place a new airport in opera- tion is very long and complex. If the process is not begun now, there is a real chance that the region could suffer severe economic loss resulting from the lack of adequate air transportation facilities. Metropolitan Airports Commission Study MAC'S study? /, as directed by the Legislature, focussed on a ten -year horizon. MSP 2000+ addressed airport capacity from the standpoints of l/ Is the Airport Adequate? Report of the Minneapolis /St. Paul International Airport Adequacy Study Advisory Task Force to the Metropolitan Council, October 1988. ?/ MSP 2000 +, Airport Master Plan Update, Metropolitan Airports Commission, December 1988. Request for Proposal MSP International Airport Adequacy Study April 11, 1989 Page 3 Airside capacity (runways, taxiways, apron space), terminal capacity (gates, baggage handling, ticketing, queuing space, waiting space), and landside capacity (curbside loading /unloading, parking, public transpor- tation, traffic flow, access.via the regional highway system). The study found that air traffic expected in the Year 2000 would require airport facilities improvements in several areas: o Airside: Runway 4 -22 extension, and taxiway and apron improvements. o Terminal: additional gates, baggage handling space and ticketing space. o Landside: additional curbside space and parking capacity, upgrading of public transportation facilities, reconstruction of terminal area roadways to serve new terminal facilities. MSP 2000+ found that'air traffic expected to occur in the Year 2000 can be adequately served by existing runways. This conclusion represents the basic difference between the Metropolitan Council's Airport Adequacy Study and the Metropolitan Airports Commission's MSP 2000+ Master Plan Update. MAC Commissioners have adopted the position that the two -track strategy proposed by the Metropolitan Council is the most reasonable approach to planning for future airport needs. The Commission also agreed to conduct an analysis of the need for and the feasibility of a new North -South run- way. STUDY OBJECTIVE The Metropolitan Council and the Metropolitan Airports Commission analyzed the same airport using the same base data.and the same basic forecasts, yet came to different conclusions regarding the ability of MSP airport to serve air traffic volumes expected in the Year 2000 and the nature of airside improvements necessary to serve expected air traffic. The objective of this study is to review the work of both agencies, supple- ment the work completed to date with additional analysis where necessary, and develop conclusions regarding: o Volume and mix of air traffic which will use MSP Airport during the forecast period. o Capability of MSP Airport to accommodate that traffic and alternative means of enhancing the airport's capacity. Request for Proposal MSP International Airport Adequacy Study April 11, 1989 Page 4 o Economic impact of relocation of the existing airport on opportunities for economic growth by existing and future commercial and service businesses in Bloomington and Richfield. o Interaction between the Twin Cities region and other regions with respect to demand for air travel and the ability of each region to accommodate that demand. o The economic and environmental impacts and benefits of the North -South runway alternative on�the communities. o The impact of creating an additional growth center around a new air- port. o Recommendations for Legislative and /or agency actions related, to meeting future air travel needs in the Twin Cities market. o Examine impact of new airport on reliever airport system. o Summarize legal issues necessary to implement dual track approach. When the results of the analysis conducted in this study differ substan- tially from the results of the Metropolitan Council study or the Metropolitan Airports Commission study, the Consultant team will be expected to identify alternative assumptions, data sources, analysis metho- dologies, or resources which support the team's conclusions. STUDY METHODOLOGY The question of the adequacy of MSP Airport and the alternatives available for expanding its capacity have been analyzed by two ,independent and com- petent agencies and their consultants. The analyses reached different conclusions. In order to achieve credibility, an additional analysis must mobilize recognized expertise. Expert Panel This study will utilize an Expert Panel composed of knowledgeable and recognized experts in each of the relevant areas of interest in airport planning. The panel is expected to include experts in the areas of: o Airline Industry Economics o Air Travel Forecasts o Airfield Capacity o Airfield Design o Terminal Capacity Request for Proposal MSP Internationa Airport Adequacy Study April 11, 1989 Page 5 o Terminal Design o Landside Capacity o Landside Design o Aircraft Noise o Aviation Law o Land Use Planning and Development o Urban Economics o Airport Infrastructure Capacity o Airport Infrastructure Design The Expert Panel will be assembled by the project leader. The panel will include recognized and respected experts from'the airline industry, from government, from academic institutions, and /or from the consulting field. Individual team members are likely to possess significant experience in more than one area, and it is therefore expected that proposer's panels will include about five to six members. Each member of the proposed team will be expected to contribute to the analysis both within the member's area of special expertise, and as a seasoned observer of the commercial airline business who recognizes the interrelationships among all areas of expertise. Even though the Metropolitan Council and the Metropolitan Airports Commission have each conducted extensive analysis of the airport, this study is not expected to merely review and comment on those analyses. It is expected that this analysis will uncover as yet unused base data and /or modify or refine previous work in ways which may influence the outcome of the analysis. It is anticipated that a panel of experts will bring a fresh perspective to the issues, scope the analysis to crucial issues, formulate and execute the analysis required to identify and su^-Ort i'ternative assumptions or analy sis methodologies, and document those findings for referral to the Metropolitan Council and the Metropolitan Airports Commission for con- sideration. Study Management A key factor in execution of this project will be the management and coor- dination of the panel of experts and other study resources. Although experts are fully capable of carrying out the analysis required within their areas of expertise, the project leader will be responsible for coor- dination of those efforts, for facilitating the interaction of experts, for preparation and distribution of study products, and for interface with client representatives. Request for Proposal MSP International Airport Adequacy Study April 11, 1989 Page 6 WORK PROGRAM The work program consists of six tasks. The study will emphasize iden- tification of pivotal issues, reduction of scope, and focused analysis._ Task 1 - Review Available Data The client will provide the consultant team all available information related to key study issues, including analyses prepared by the Metropolitan Council and the Metropolitan Airports Commission. The con- sultant' will review this data as well as any other relevant studies available to the team.. Although detailed review of the work previously conducted by the Metropolitan Council and the Metropolitan Airports Commission is expected, collection of data from primary sources and independent analyses are fun- damental aspects of the project. If the consultant team requires any additional information to conduct the study, those needs will be referred to the client. The client will provide that information to the extent possible. Task 2 - Identify Key Issues - Expert Panel The number of issues which have been raised during the execution of studies by the Metropolitan Council and the Metropolitan Airports Commission is large and wide ranging. It is likely that those issues could be reduced in number in a scoping process which would bring the study to focus on those issues which most strongly influence the conclusion regarding airport ade- quacy. The responsible expert in each issue area will evaluate available infor- mation regarding that issue, and conduct additional research and analysis, if required. An issue description paper will be prepared which describes the issue, available related data and analysis conducted to date. The paper will present a recommendation to the Client as to whether that issue should be considered a pivotal issue and studied in detail. Issue. description papers will be submitted to the client. The client will reproduce and distribute the papers to all panel members for review. The Expert Panel will convene for its first meeting when all recommen- dations have been circulated and reviewed by all other experts and the Client. The first meeting will: Request for Proposal MSP international Airport Adequacy Study April 11, 1989 Page 7 o Select the pivotal issues from among the universe of issues originally identified. o Set parameters for in -depth analysis. It is anticipated that a maximum of five pivotal issues will be selected for detailed analysis. Task 3 - Prepare Issue Analysis Papers Pivotal "issues will be subjected to detailed analysis. Issue analysis papers will describe base assumptions and data, and analysis methodology and alternatives. The analysis will be carried to the point where clear and relevant differences between this analysis and that conducted by the Metropolitan Council or the Metropolitan Airports Commission are iden- tifiable and supportable. Analyses will be thoroughly documented. Each issue paper will include discussion of any differences between its conclu- sions and those of previous analyses. Issue papers will be submitted to the client. The client will reproduce and distribute the papers to all panel members for review and comment. Task 4 - Review Analysis Each issue paper will be critically reviewed by all panel members. Through the project leader, panel members will work toward consensus regarding the appropriateness and consistency of the assumptions, procedures and conclu- sions contained in each paper. Panel members will identify any refined or additional analysis required prior to reaching conclusions. Task 5 - Refine Analysis and Formulate Conclusions Panel members will conduct any refined or additional analysis required. Each panel member will then prepare a draft of findings and conclusions which reflects the expert's perspective. Draft findings and conclusions will be submitted to the client. The client will reproduce and distribute the. draft findings and conclusions to all panel members for review and comfient prior to the panel meeting. Task 6 - Expert Panel: Conclusions and Report At the panel meeting, members will draft findings and conclusions regar- ding: Request for Proposal MSP International Airport Adequacy Study April 11, 1989 Page 8 o Volume and mix of .air traffic which will use MSP Airport during the forecast period. o Capability of MSP Airport to accommodate that traffic and alternative means of enhancing the airport's capacity. o Economic impact of relocation of the existing airport on opportunities for economic growth by existing and future ,commercial and service businesses in the communities. o Interaction between the Twin Cities region and other regions with respect to demand for air travel and the ability of each region to accommodate that demand. o The economic and environmental impacts and benefits of the North -South runway alternative on the communities. o The impact of creating an additional growth center around a new air- port. o Recommendations for Legislative and /or agency actions related to meeting future air travel needs in the Twin Cities market. When consensus is reached, the Consultant will prepare a report which docu- ments the study process and findings and conclusions. The consultant will provide camera -ready copy of the report to the client for printing and distribution. PRODUCTS The Consultant will produce papers at three points: o Issue Description Papers - For review and discussion by the panel in order to identify key issues for detailed analysis. o Issue Analysis Papers - In -depth analysis of key issues. o. Report — Full documentation of process, findings and recommendations. The report should include a. summary for distribution to the general public. The summary sfiould include a review of major issues and findings. Request for Proposal MSP International Airport Adequacy Study April 11, 1989 Page 9 SCHEDULE The ,project is to be completed within six months of authorization to proceed. The study is expected to conform to the schedule listed below. o April 14, 1989 Request for proposals issued. o April 27, 1989 o May 5, 1989 o May 10, 1989 o May 16, 1989 o May 17, 1989 o June 1, 1989 o July 14, 1989 o October 13, 1989 o November 1, 1989 BUDGET Prepropasal Conference 2:00 P.M., C.D.T. Council Chambers Richfield City Hall 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield, Minnesota Deadline for receipt of proposals. Staff review of proposals. Interview selected consultant teams. Consultant recommendation. Authorization to proceed issued. Task 2 complete; Expert Panel meets. Task 5 complete; Expert Panel meets to review conclusions and recommendations. Report issued, study complete. The budget established to fund all consultant services and expenses is $100,000.00. PROJECT MANAGEMENT The project will be managed by representatives of the Cities of Bloomington, Richfield, Burnsville, Edina and Eden Prairie. Request for Proposal MSP International Airport Adequacy Study April 11, 1989 Page 0 PROPOSAL CONTENTS The proposal will identify all members of the expert panel, and present their qualifications. The proposal should specifically describe how and by whom the project will be managed. Proposals will be a maximum of thirty pages in length. EVALUATION CRITERIA Two principal criteria will be used to evaluate proposals to conduct this project:' o Level of experience and expertise represented by members of the expert panel. o Method proposed to manage and coordinate the work of the expert. panel. A 1989 OF EDINA 2 CHECK .STER 05 -01 -8. .,AGE 1 TEM -DESCR IP- T- ION 9C000NT- NOT-- INV. - -N- P . O. -N MESSAGE- 1. J' '1 2 � �1 -3 1 -2- 1-7-03 a4L-18159 346.54 A FORM- GOLF -LIMN SAND TRAP - -RAKES 27=4504=664 -66- 00-1746 -9552 1� 346.54 * 4 1e 1s 1L 21704 04/18/89 3"0 ----- --------MRPA REGISTRATION ' ^4804� -624 -b2 2f 16 35.00 * z 17 2' 1B 508. -8Q EARL - PETERSON AMBULANCE - REFUND 1-0- i+a0�004-00 2• `Z0 208.89 * 2• z! Iz1 z: 22 z 2; d23 121707 04/18/89 38.30 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC OFFICE SUPPLYS 30- 4516 - 781 -78 8140 1169 I3 24 0 * 3: 25 I3. ze 121708 04/18/89 690.00 POUCHER PRINTINIG BOND PRINTING 10- 1145- 000 -00 30768 1a E+-708 04/-1-8/ -89- ' 250:90 POUCHER- PRINTINIG BOND- PR- INTING 1-0--4445--000 -00 -30758 �3t 2° 121708 04/18/89 502.00 POUCHER PRINTINIG BOND PRINTING 27- 4201- 661 -66 30778 3a i29 121708 04/18/89 460.00 POUCHER PRINTINIG BOND PRINTING 66- 4600- 000 -00 30788 3f I30 4( 31 14' . �32 4: 121709 04/18/89 215.57 VIKING CAMPER SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 1050 9715 l4: 33 34 15167 * 4e 4: �75 121710 04/18/89 106.80 BUD LARSON SALES BROOMS 10 -4580- 301 -30 7539 9874 << 36 10680 A 4t 37 ,f 39 121711 04/18/89 153.61 PLANT EQUIP INC VALVE 40- 4540 - 801 -80 11492 9469 lei - 17l1 ^4,L4 -8/$9 153.61 PLANT- EQUI -P -INC VALVE 40=-- 4550=$0 80 -- 7-1492 -9469 4 121711 04/18/89 153.61- PLANT EQUIP INC VALVE 40- 4550 - 801 -80 11492 9469 5' 41 1 7< 153.61 * 5! 42 SC 43 121712 04/18/89 129.58 INTER CITY TRUCK BRAKE REPAIR 10 -4248- 560 -56 27308 1127 ;F 44 129.58 * Igo 45 eC 4e 121713 04/18/89 215.11 HANCE COMPANIES SOLENOID 10- 4540 - 560 -56 64667 9711 47 215.11 4e 64 49 121714 04/18/89 323.25 BERG BAG CO SAND BAGS 40- 4504 - 800 -80 15788 9880 Ie� so 121714 04/18/89 323.25 BERG BAG CO SAND BAGS 40 -4504- 900 -80 15788 9880 e7 S1 323 25- BED& RAG CO SAND BAGS 404504- 900-80 -15788 -9880 6E 52 323.25 * B 33 C C 71 54 I.VONEN- PAI.NIINGG -- PAINT- I- QI��- ±�OA-O-1 -20 -9-99 72 55 121715 04/18/89 11781.00 TOIVONEN PAINTING PAINTING 60- 1300 - 011 -20 9998 Se 2, 161 . 00 * 75 37 7F • 121700 0 04/18/89 6 6,200.00 B BACKDAHL b OLSON H HOUSE CONN TO SEWER 6 60 -1300- 011 -29 5 5519 8 8836 J 3 1 6J-200-.-00-* - -- — — - - -- - - - - - -- - J3 6 1 121701 0 04/18/89 2 2,722.00 H HYLAND HILLS SKI ARE S SKI LESSON FEES 1 10-2240- 000 -00 3 3413 1 1232 X22.00 • ° ° 7 - ig s 1 121702 0 04/18/89 1 11000.00 D DEAN BERRY ASSOC F FOCUS SESSIONS 1 10- 4212-510 -51 1 11 _"_oe 0 04/25,489 1 1 x305 -00 D DEAN- BERR "SSAG P PROF- GONF-ERENGE 1 1- 0-421 STO S! - -1' if 2 2,305.00 * ie • 65.00 * 51! -124- 732 - -04J1 -8189 50. -00- - KENT -RILEY - - -- SERVICES - -- 30- 4224 - -781 -78 -- - - - - -- - 52 50.00 L-1 I34 1Pi733 04/1a/89- SO. 0 -0. KAL_9SHWORTH SERVICES 3.0- 4224_81-78 5S1 50.00 �, 56 5' 24-7-34 -- 0441 -8/-89 1 -67 SO - -- BUREAU -OF- NATL - - - -- - - -- -250 FACT - SHEETS - - -.- -10- 42.1.2 - 510 -51 203422 - - ��I J 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -01 -89 PAGE 2 CHECK- NO_DATE AMOUNT- VENDOR ITEM - DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT- NO.- INV.- # -P.O. # MESSAGE - -- -1 JI3 - 121 -716 04/411/89 25:00--- - -MPSA - - REGISTRAT- ION - - - - -- -10- 4202- 600 -60 - - -- ' 4 25.00 6 124 -7-1- 04//48/-89 4 -1,-85 LY-LE-AXT REIMBURSEMENT- _29-4624722-72 ---- - - - - -- , ' 41.8S * I , 9 12 18- 04/4A3/69 20 -.25 FERERAE= EXPRESS -CORP OVERNIGHTT -MAIL 1 -0- 4290- SI -0 -S1- - - - - - -- - - - -- -- " �,� 20.25 * SS ' .719 04/i -8/89 100 - -00 FERN-DALE SERVICES 30- 4224-781-78 3 171 171 141 'St-- 12- ta2G------04f- f-8/89 301-00 GALHOUN -3-869-8 -$ERV -ICE$ i0- 4224- 78- 1- 78-- - - - - -- ---- - -- 30.00 * 121 It 10.-- X21701 04/18/89 150-00 DFE TRAUDT SERV -LCES "10= 4224 - 78.1 -- 8 2:, 9 150.00 * _ zoi z.I 1z1i }2722- 048189 50. -00- BONNIE- NEWMAN- SERVICES 50.00 * ti23 3-1 Iz51 4.--21723 04/- -1 -8499 1- O.0 -0-0 STEVE ORES SERVICES 30-4224-781 -78 100.00 * 12 261 J 7 1247244/-1 -8/89 50 -.-00 KENWOOD�HAMBER SERVI -CES - 30--4224�8> --78 - - - -- -- -_, L 3 29 50.00 * 3 301225 04118/89 SD_ 00 W liEN3 SERVI -CES 30- 4224 7818 - -;,, 31 50.00 s „32 33 - -1 -21726 04/18/ 9 i0 -. -00 ELLA-TERRY SERVICES 30- 4224 81 -78 -- - 3. 30.00 IJ. .- JS I t•l 76 121727 - 4419/_89 SO ... 00 JIM - HAMILTON SERVI-CES 30-422-4- 78.1 -78 50.00 Lr30 __ 121728 - 04//a-B /S9 --- 75 -.00 WEST -BANK SERVICES - 30 -4224- 781--78 ---- -- -- ---- --- - - - - -- ----" 40 75.00 ,. 1941 55 l42 P60-00 TEDD- 1-BEAR_BAWD SERVICES -30 22.4- 781-78 43 260.00 `l. 44 4$ 1-21 30- 04/--18/-89- 50,00 SCOTT- DAVIES SERVICES 30- 4224�781= -78 - - - -- --- ----- - - - - g' 50.00 * <„ 14j46 �I'° 121731 041184S9 65_00 SALULBONKRUDE SERVICES 30- 422-4- 7-81 -7.8 65.00 * 51! -124- 732 - -04J1 -8189 50. -00- - KENT -RILEY - - -- SERVICES - -- 30- 4224 - -781 -78 -- - - - - -- - 52 50.00 L-1 I34 1Pi733 04/1a/89- SO. 0 -0. KAL_9SHWORTH SERVICES 3.0- 4224_81-78 5S1 50.00 �, 56 5' 24-7-34 -- 0441 -8/-89 1 -67 SO - -- BUREAU -OF- NATL - - - -- - - -- -250 FACT - SHEETS - - -.- -10- 42.1.2 - 510 -51 203422 - - ��I N, 1989 , OF EDINA CHECK STER 05 -01 -8: AGE 3 CHECK -NO --DATA AMOUNT VENDOR t- TEM- DESCRIP -TION ACCOUNT - NO— INV, -N P.O. - -N - MESSAGE - - - --. , 2 2 3 I IV(.7V s 1 121735 0 04/18/89 1 15.75 I ICMA C COPY 1 10- 4502 - 440 -44 15. 7S 16 1 121736 0 04/18/89 7 769.92 B BARTLEY LINDSAY CO R REPAAIR PARTS 4 40- 4540 - 801 -80 2 211525 1 1142 9 7 769.92 + + �1 1 1 121737 0 04/18/89 5 52.50 V VFW POST 45555 A ADVERTISING 5 50- 4214 - 822 -82 ; ; 121737 0 04/18/89 5 52.50 V VFW POST 45555 A ADVERTISING 5 50- 4214 - 842 -84 1 1 I12 1 12737 0 04/48/89 5 52, -50 % %FW- POST 1FS555- A ADVERTISING 5 50=42 -t4- 862 -86 - - - -- ' 14 1 157.50 • • I16 1 121738 0 04/48/89 ' '8 -33- M MN- AMVETS- -NEWS— A ADVERTISING - - -- 5 50 -4214- 822 -82 1 n---------- - 121738 0 04/18/89 1 18.33 M MN AMVETS NEWS A ADVERTISING 5 50- 4214 - 842 -84 121738 0 04/18/89 1 18.34 M MN AMVETS NEWS A ADVERTISING 5 50-4214 - 862-86 I8 1 * * * * ** * -0 -0 - --------- 1I21 I 121742 0 04/20/89 6 67.51 G GROTH MUSIC M MUSIC SUPPLIES 1 10-4596- 627 -62 23 6 67.51 * * 25 1 121743 0 04/20/89 5 535.00 C CROWN FENCE & WIRE F FENCE REPAIR 1 10 -4248- 301 -30 2 2175 1 1018 I; 26 5 535.00 * * I 127 28 1 121744 0 04/20/89 2 23.50 J JOE SHEPARD R REPAIR GOLF CLUB 2 27-4504 - 667 -66 29 2 23.50 * * 31 1 121745 0 04/20/89 3 35.00 J JOHN SCHIRMANG M MEETING EXP 1 10 -4202- 490 -49 32 I * � � I33 3 121746 0 04/20/89 5 560.00 J JOHN H EKLUND H HAUL BRUSH 1 10-4250- 644 -64 39 IF30 5 560.00 I37 * ** * ** * * * * -CKS 39 121748 3 8 O O - HURST -TO04 -RARE' 1 10- 4940 -440 -4 0 001257- 1 1-318 � �. F. 41 3 32.08 42 9 9 1 1 ^ ^0 S STA E C- MARSHALL M MEDIA -- GUIDE 1 10- i502 -44D"4 ' ' 44 10.00 IS 145 X X750 0 0412689 3 38-33 M MPAwS-- SPOKESMAN A AD- 0 08-4204-701-70-44,688 46 V 7� .l 4 5 • Q 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -01 -89 PAGE 4 HECK -NO —DATE AMOUNT VENDOR- I-T-EM- DESCRIP -T -ION ACCOUNT-NO.-INV. N -P.O. N MESSAGE- - - - - -- -� 121771 04/24/89 12.50 NAOMI 828.45 * 12-1-7-71 -04/24/69 - 04/24/89 67.4 2- - NAOMI- 3 52 - _l4 121757 04/25/89 465.21 LUNDS PLOWING 10- 4504 - 365 -30 9747 1377 _ 5 121757 04/24/89 421.00 LUNDS SNOW REMOVAL 50- 4201- 821 -82 09746 1412 7 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION ° 121758 04/24/89 90.00 -MN DE PT OF PUBLIG --- TELETYPE SERV 10- 4268- 420 -42 12 -1758 04!24/89- 150.00 w, nreT nr o„o, z r TELETYPE -SERV 1 -0 -4266- 420 -42- -- - - -- "I 240.00 * ;,4I , 1 12 1,51 " -12.1 -759 ^4/24/89 77 88 JI-t'1- KNUTSON MILEAGE 1-0-4208 1- 6A =1 -6 - -- - — - 1 3I 14l 77.88 * 6E 1 2 -1760 04/24/29 221_ -45 -HENN- COUNT- Y- SHERIFF-----JAI L- FEE - -- _I 221.45 * z, n 2!' 8 1.21761 04/-24/-89 10-00 WM_BERNKJELM REIMBURSEMENNT In -42A2- 420-42 - -- !` _ 201 30.00 * 2- 12 -1-762 04/24/89 30 -. -00 K EN -KANE REIMBURSEMENT + -0- 4202 =420- 42- - -- -- ------ - - - - -- _I21 22 23 30.00 * as -2x763 0- 4/2-4/8 -9 4.95 -. -00 P- RAIR.I -E -- NURSERY WILD Fl OWER-SEED 1n =4568 =643 =64 - 02884 -9775 3' 3,� _1l4I ZGi 495.00 * ,•; _L 1- 2.1x64 04/-24/89 63,99 FLOWER -- --TOWN CHAIR - COVERS 07 =4504= 662 -66-82647 - 1172 -- ---- - - - - -- �3 29I 63.99 I3 30 �a�76c n44�84 495_00 1 ITT' F BL.I- ND_S20T REMODELING QS= 4.92-4- 520 - 52_2603 1.0.96 32 495.00 3 L -12 -1-7-66 04/-24/89 99, 00------ CORP- REPORT -FA — - FACT -BOOK -1 -0- 4502 - 140 -- 14__150915 -1409 -- - -- 341 99.00 * 3° 121768 39 _l40 l42 121769 431 04/24/89 04/24/89 646.12 CHARLES RISLER 646-12 245.00 GEORGIANA SAMPSON CONFERENCE AMBULANCE REFUND 50 -4202- 840 -84 10- 3180 - 000 -00 121770 04/24/89 210.00 MONICA RUDQUIST PART TIME MAINT 23- 4120 - 612 -61 12 -1 -770 04/-24/89 4S6-.-00 MONICA- RUDQUIST AC- INSTRUCTOR— a3= 420 -1 b -11 =61 666.00 * _149 121771 04/24/89 37.96 NAOMI JOHNSON 5' 121771 04/24/89 12.50 NAOMI JOHNSON 12-1-7-71 -04/24/69 - 04/24/89 67.4 2- - NAOMI- JOHNSON 52 - 121771 04/24/89 14.50 NAOMI JOHNSON 53 149.23 _155 121772 04/24/89 11.24 POLICE DEPT Isb 121772 04/24/89 20.00 POLICE DEPT 51 .'I 3 1I CRAFT_SUPPLIES Q3- 4214- 6.1.1 -61 GENERAL SUPPLIES 23- 4504 - 611 -61 OFFICE SUPPLIES AC 23- 4516 - 611 -61 CRAFT SUPPLIES---23-4588-611-61------ - PRINTING 23- 4600- 611 -61 CABLE TV CONT ED 10 -2149- 000 -00 10 -4202- 420 -42 1989 ( OF EDINA CHECK n- 4ISTER 05 -01 -89 PAGE 5 CHECK "'^ ^ATE AMOUNT %.JENDOR ITEM -0ESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO INV 11 P-0 M MESSAGE 121772 04/24/89 20.00 POLICE DEPT DUES 10- 4204 - 420 -42 3 3 -- S 12177 04/2418'9 56 -41- POL -ICE -DEPT- MTG -EXP- 1-0 -4206- 420 -42 - -- - - - -- - - - - -- - -J4 4 121772 04/24/89 207.57 POLICE DEPT MILEAGE 10 -4208- 420 -42 15 le 5 8 121772 1- 21-772 04/24/89 - ^4/24/89 10.00 17-7-30 POLICE DEPT OOL-I -CE -DEPT BOOKS GENERAL-- SUPPLYS 10- 4502- 420 -42 I^ "--4SO4-420-42 - s 121772 04/24/89 19.86 POLICE DEPT PHOTO SUPPLYS 10- 4508 - 420 -42 9 522.38 * + �10 121773 04/24/89 120.00 CYD WICKER AC INSTRUCTOR 23 -4201- 611 -61 ; 120.00 * + 111 13 121774 04/24/89 229.00 DOROTHY ODLAND AC INSTRUCTOR 23 -4201- 611 -61 229.00 * 114 18 121775 04/24/89 28.00 BETTY PEDDIE AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 2 117 28.00 19 121776 04/24/89 80.00 PHYLLIS PETERSON AC INSTRUCTOR 23 -4201- 611 -61 ; 80.00 * ;_ 120 2 22. 121777 04/24/89 240.00 KATHY GUSTAFSON AC INSTRUCTOR 23 -4201- 611 -61 •; 23 4 240.00 * 3 3 25 121778 04/24/89 45.00 HARRY HEIM AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201- 611 -61 3 za 27 45.00 * a 28 121779 04/24/89 252.00 EVIE HOLMQUIST AC INSTRUCTOR 'j13 23- 4201 - 611 -61 III3 X29 30 252.00 * 3 4 31 121780 04/24/89 120.00 NICK LEGEROS AC INSTRUCTOR 23-4201- 611 -61 !4 132 120.00 * 4 I33 34 121781 04/24/89 1,425.00 MARGARET M cDOWELL AC INSTRUCTOR 23 -4201- 611 -61 4 76 1,425.00 * 4 4 37 121782 04/24/89 360.00 SUSAN FRAME AC INSTRUCTOR 23-4201- 611 -61 14 360.00 * is 13 g 40 121783 04/24/89 300.00 PAT GEISHEKER AC INSTRUCTOR 23 -4201- 611 -61 ; 41 42 300.00 * 43 121784 04/24/89 225.00 RAYMOND GORMLEY AC INSTRUCTOR 23 -4201- 611 -61 44 225.00 * 45 e 4a 121785 04/24/89 360.00 JEAN GRAPP AC INSTRUCTOR 23 -4201- 611 -61 e 47 f 48 360.00 * a a 49 so 121786 04/24/89 150.00 MARGARET GUST AC INSTRUCTOR 23-4201- 611 -61 51 150.00 * ,e e 52 121787 04/24/89 60.00 BOB CONNOLLY AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 7 73 54 60.00 * 7 7 S5 121788 04/24/89 238.00 SUE DAVIES AC INSTRUCTOR 23-4201- 611 -61 7 se -11 238.00 * 7 7 L J 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -01-8! PAGE 6 - CHECK- NOTDATE AMOUNT —VENDOR------ITEM-DESCRIPTION -- ACCOUNT -NO - INV. -N P.O. M MESSAGE i 1=6 -1 -1=61— -- 195.50 * i i 1 S 3 I '=1 151 , - - - - 2 I 5 ^4/24/89 7-,-750-.-00 ,MPH- I- NDUSRIES REPLACE -- EQUIP- 10- 4901-,420- 42- MC3691 -9164 - -- ---- - - - - -- 7,750.00 * '_I 2- .-000-.-0 -0 I NI-TED- BATTERED HUMAN_SERVLCES 1 0.-420-1 - 504 -5.0 2,000.00 * 1 21-797 ^4/25//59 38 75 CORNER - MARKING -CO OFF -ICE- SUPPLIES 27= 451 - 6-664- -66 -8686 38.75 * 50.00 * 121799 - 04/2S/89 - -- 80.-00- - -CUR T-IS- KRIENS - - - -- REPAIR -AIR- VENTS -- _27_-4248- 6 80.00 * 1361 IPI800 ^4/-25/89 1- 1- 4_-1 -0 RELTY__P-EDDIE ART WORK -SOLD 23 -3625c 000 -00 - -- - 3i� 114.10 * 311 1047-- a -1 I i 2180 -1 04/25/89- 125 -. -00 — MERLE - ANDERSON - CLEANING 27-4288- 667 -66- - - - -- 125.00 * at a` 1.2.1502 ^d/-25/- -89 1 -1 -2_50 CHR -I ST P-RESBY-TERIAN REFUND 27 432- 000 -00 -- - - 43 112.50 * as NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTIC 45 1 -2 -1.803 ^4/25/89 - 40x00- -- ��WER�I- 6866EAGR REFUND 27 -3432- 000 -00 - - - - -- a` 40.00 * _L 121 -804 X4/25/-89 96_-20 JOHN- HAMMOND SERV_I-CES -27- 288- 667 -66 - - -- - - - - -_ _- _ "I 96.20 50, 51 - 121805 ; -d/2S/89 133.20 - -- - KARL- GJERNES SERVICES -- - . -.27-- 4288 - 667 -66- . -- 52 133.20 53 54 .1 -2 -1-806 04/_25/- -5- DOUG_KEHR.ING SERVICES 2L4288- 667 -66 "r 72.15 5121 80-7- - 04/25/89 -- -- 1- 1- 1- . -00 - -- - TOM- SCHLEICH ----- - - - - -- SERVICES -- 27= 4288- 667 -66 - - - - - -- -,i �-I z 3 -- 121789 -- 04/24/89- - - - -- 456:- 00------ BIL- _- DIETR- ICHSON----- - -AC -- INSTRUCTOR---- .--- - - -23- 4201 - 611 -61 - a l 3 456.00 Ie - 121 -79A 04/24.8 -9 390-00- T-OBIE- DICKER AC- INSTRUCTOR 23= 4201 - 611- 61 - - - -- - - -- 390.00 'I I'� 124791 04/24/89 101 -00 AGNES -F -I NE ---AC-INSTRUCTOR-23- 4201--611--6i - - - -- - - 101.00 w — 121792 04/24/89 60,-00 BE- TSY- BRaANT AC- INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 =61-1-61 - - -- qi 60.00 --121- 793 - 04/24/89 1-,-476:00 -BAR- IAN- ALSTAD- -AC- INSTRUCTOR- 23- 4204-611- 61- - - - - -- 1151- 151 1,476.00 * i 1=6 -1 -1=61— -- 195.50 * i i 1 S 3 I '=1 151 , - - - - 2 I 5 ^4/24/89 7-,-750-.-00 ,MPH- I- NDUSRIES REPLACE -- EQUIP- 10- 4901-,420- 42- MC3691 -9164 - -- ---- - - - - -- 7,750.00 * '_I 2- .-000-.-0 -0 I NI-TED- BATTERED HUMAN_SERVLCES 1 0.-420-1 - 504 -5.0 2,000.00 * 1 21-797 ^4/25//59 38 75 CORNER - MARKING -CO OFF -ICE- SUPPLIES 27= 451 - 6-664- -66 -8686 38.75 * 50.00 * 121799 - 04/2S/89 - -- 80.-00- - -CUR T-IS- KRIENS - - - -- REPAIR -AIR- VENTS -- _27_-4248- 6 80.00 * 1361 IPI800 ^4/-25/89 1- 1- 4_-1 -0 RELTY__P-EDDIE ART WORK -SOLD 23 -3625c 000 -00 - -- - 3i� 114.10 * 311 1047-- a -1 I i 2180 -1 04/25/89- 125 -. -00 — MERLE - ANDERSON - CLEANING 27-4288- 667 -66- - - - -- 125.00 * at a` 1.2.1502 ^d/-25/- -89 1 -1 -2_50 CHR -I ST P-RESBY-TERIAN REFUND 27 432- 000 -00 -- - - 43 112.50 * as NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTIC 45 1 -2 -1.803 ^4/25/89 - 40x00- -- ��WER�I- 6866EAGR REFUND 27 -3432- 000 -00 - - - - -- a` 40.00 * _L 121 -804 X4/25/-89 96_-20 JOHN- HAMMOND SERV_I-CES -27- 288- 667 -66 - - -- - - - - -_ _- _ "I 96.20 50, 51 - 121805 ; -d/2S/89 133.20 - -- - KARL- GJERNES SERVICES -- - . -.27-- 4288 - 667 -66- . -- 52 133.20 53 54 .1 -2 -1-806 04/_25/- -5- DOUG_KEHR.ING SERVICES 2L4288- 667 -66 "r 72.15 5121 80-7- - 04/25/89 -- -- 1- 1- 1- . -00 - -- - TOM- SCHLEICH ----- - - - - -- SERVICES -- 27= 4288- 667 -66 - - - - - -- -,i �-I 1989 L OF EDINA z CHECK , .$TER OS -01 -8$ AGE 7 CRIRT -I -ON ACCOUNT - X10- .-INV,- N- P-.O, -A MESSAGE- J �2 �31J 3 _ 1 1 1.00 * * s 1 _- 1 04/25/89 5 57.35 T TOM DIMBERIO S SERVICES 2 27-4288 - 667 -66 6 5 57.35 * * a 1 121809 0 04/2S/89 2 20.00 S SMITHSONIAN S SUBSCRIPTION 1 10 -4204- 600 -60 9 2 20.00 * * 121810 0 04/25/89 1 1,490.01 H HENN CTY MED CENTER A AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 1 10- 4510 - 440 -44 7 7354 9 9911 1 1,490.01 * * - a 1 121811 0 04/25/89 2 297.90 F -__ - TRG VIDEOS 1 -- - - - - - -- - - -- - - -- 4 0 v � 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -01 -89 PAGE 8 VENDOR — I-- T-EM- DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT-NO- INV.- N -P.O. N MESSAGE - - - - -- _1 �1 3 140.00 * 1, 3 3 1 4 121825 04/25/89 80.02 MOLLIE PAULSON ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 s 12182S 04/25/89 67.96 MOLLIE PAULSON EAC PERSONEL SERV 23- 4120 - 613 -61 7 6 1- 47 — - -- 9 I -98-'r 121826 04/25/89 59.50 ELIZABETH SELDEN ART WORK SOLD 23 -3625- 000 -00 .. + ,o 9 ---- 59- - -50 -* 13 121827 04/25/89 36.40 GAIL RUSSEL ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 sl 13 36 - -40-b — -- - - -- — -- 0) 1'i 4 121828 04/25/89 6S.80 SUSAN FRAME ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 :cl " 121829 04/25/89 20.00 VFIS VIDEO 10 -4608- 440 -44 =.I I _ 20_00 —x, 9I zo 121830 04/25/89 60.83 TWIN CITY READER ADVERTISNING 50-4214- 822 -82 - 121830 - 04425189 1 -00 -83 TWIN— C- I -T -Y— READER -- AADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 822-82 -- 52202-- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- 2 121830 04/25/89 60.83 TWIN CITY READER ADVERTISNING 50-4214 - 842 -84 1I z3 121830 04/25/89 100.83 TWIN CITY READER ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 842 -84 52202 3I zap --12 -1830 04/25489 1- 00_ -84 TWIN —CITY READER ADVERTISING— 50-42-44- 862 -86- 52202 -- Z5, 121830 04/25/89 60.84 TWIN CITY READER ADVERTISING 50-4214- 862 -86 58410 3;I 2i ' 485.00 * 3i z7 • ze 121831 04/25/89 111.94 DALE LUNDGREN MILEAGE 30- 4208- 781 -78 ".I X2 33 0 111.94 .. (31� 121832 04/25/89 358.00 LIZ GEREBI REIMBURSEMENT 30 -3512- 000 -00 J31 358.00 * 3A 121833 04/25/89 50.00 MS DONNA KOLLAR REFUNS 30 -3507- 000 -00 1 35 50.00 * 13' 121834 04/25/89 20.00 MPSA DUES 30- 4204 - 781 -78 39 39 20.00 * s� 4, 121835 04/25/89 43.00 EXECUFOODS INC REFUND 10- 3045 - 000 -00 43.00 * s' I4z 63� 121836 04/25/89 3,150.75 DEDE HENSEL SERVICES 28- 4201 - 701 -70 44 4 5 3,150.75 * 121837 04/25/89 2,385.00 LUIS HERNANDEZ REFEREE 27- 4100 - 667 -66 -- -- -- -- -- - - - ', 47 40 2.385.00 * f•� ; 9 121838 04/25/89 110.00 JAMES JEZIERSKI MAINT 10- 4274- 420 -42 0 110.00 * s, 521-- 121839 04/25/89 60.29 EXPLORERS POST 925 REIMBURSEMENT 10- 4208 - 420 -42 54 60.29 * �+ J53 -1 121840 04/25/89 222.00 ST CLOUD STATE TRAINING 10- 4202 - 430 -42 "`, 222.00 * 1989 OF EDINA CHECK .STER OS -01 -8. AGE 9 CHECK- NO --0ATE AMOUNT VENDOR *TEM- DESCR- IP -TION ACCOUNT-- NO.- INV -. -1F P.O. -* MESSAGE - ----- 2 l I' - 12184F 04/25/89 -1- 660 -00- K -iNG8 -COURT- OF -EDINA WOODEN- LOCKERS 30-4 -330- 000 -00 ----- --- - - - - -- a 11660.00 + �, 3 o - 124842 ^4/25/39 6-5-752 S_^LVEi- SWENSON --- MILEAGE 10- 4208=600 -60 -- -I B 65.52 • I', 9 121- 843 — .4/251$9 23-6-.-36 — JOHN- KEPR-1-0S REIMBURSEMENT 10- 4202 - 600 -60 — 10 236.36 � 12 - 121844 -04/25/89 236 -. -36- BOB-- KOJETIN REIMBURSEMENT 10 -4202- 600 -60 3� 121844 04/25/89 129.80 BOB KOJETIN REIMBURSEMENT 10- 4202 - 600 -60 a 121844 04/25/89 236.36 BOB KOJETIN REIMBURSEMENT 10- 4202 - 600 -60 S — 1218440 4/25/89 '29 -80 BOB- KOJETIN- - -- REIMBURSEMENT ' -0- 4202 - 600 -60 16 121844 04/25/89 129.80- BOB KOJETIN REIMBURSEMENT 10 -4202- 600 -60 17 e 129.80 * 19' 121845 04/2S/89 10.00 HENN CTY FIRE DUES 10 -4204- 440 -44 +20 21 10.00 * 22 121846 04/25/89 25.00 MPSA REGISTRATION 10 -4202- 600 -60 23 24 25.00 * 25 121847 04/25/89 231.41 DENISON MAIL LABELS SERVICES 10-4201 - 200 -20 231.41 * _l �26 28 121848 04/25/89 2,700.00 DON LOFTHUS SERVICE 40- 4201 - 800 -80 128 30 2,700.00 * 31 121849 04/25/89 11,623.00 POLAR CHEV /MAZDA CARS 10-4901-650-64 , 33 11,623.00 * J4 * ** -CKS (33 1a-1A01 040481-89 60-00 3M CO MATEREIALS 10- 4542 - 325 -30- 3437-4- 9939 — 1366 37 60.00 * 138 39 A2- 4,"2� �g9 lao a R58 ; -090 9- 0 -6 - rRANCE - -B RUBBISH HAULING 1-0 -Sol-'% 95-30 9,258.00 * 1421 4 *f *- CKS—,. _ 44 121A09 04/18/89 723.13 AAA CAR PLATES 10- 4310 - 560 -56 95 23 ,43 46 14] * * * * ** * ** -CKS I. 49 121A11 04/20/89 31.26 ACE SUPPLY PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 080208 1175 31.26 * 150 52 121Al2 04/25/89 175.00 ACME WINDOW CLEANING WINDOW CLEANING 10- 4504 - 390 -39 1386 153 175.00 * I55 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 56 57 jpq Apq - - ne19c1ne ALARM-SER1Li rG 30 1304- 782 -7A 1.472 .II 1989 CITY OF EDINA 3 -- -- 4 * * * *r* 6 --a 2a -A26 �a 9 " 121A29 '`� 18a -A29 ,3 _j 121 A36 I,a I 20 *w * * *w !`' Ile 2] 2© 29 30 32 34 35 7f. 3 30 39 4o 4, 42 43 44 45 46 4] 40 49 50 I5 II53 54 04/18/89 04/18/89 121A39 04/25/89 151.20 ALTERNATOR REBUILD BATTERY 10- 4504 - 325 -30 1646 1116 121A39 04/18/89 16.32 ALTERNATOR REBUILD THERMOMETER 10 -4504- 560 -56 1642 9643 CHECK REGISTER 78 78 ALTERNATOR- REBUILD PRING 05 -01 -89 PAGE 10 1' T— VENDOR— - -- ITEM -- DESCRIPT ION -- ACCOUNT N0. —INV.- k P.O. - N MESSAGE 1209 175.83 * -- 121A41 - -- -04/25/89 145 -.55- 3I 4 FOOD- - '— - - -- -- ----- - - " - -- – – 145.55 * * ** -CKS ; 45- 1--.20 AKONA -CORP FIELD - -CHALK 10- 4563- 642-64--20573 9168 451.20 121A53 04/25/89 150.95 AMERICAN SHARECOM TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 - 150 -r95 - - - - -- - -- - - - * ** -CKS ';I — — -- --------- 19.20 ALBINSON PRINT OF GOLF COURSE 10 -4570- 260 -26 542983 ,, 4 , -; 237-_30 ALB -INSON MARKING - PAINT 4D-4540-8A3 -8A- 543649 -1205 - - -- ---- - - - - -- ' 256.50 427.30 12 -1 -A67 n4 /�SlB9 130.. -00 AQUA_ENGINEERING - - - -- -- - - - - - -- -- -- -w *w- CKS -- .31 2!i 65.57 AUTOMOTIVE WHSL INC TRANS KIT 10- 4540 - 560 -56 91056 9627 2,I 'j - - - - - -- - - -- - -- -- - - - - *w* -CKS - 2f1 -- ;� 121A39 04/25/89 151.20 ALTERNATOR REBUILD BATTERY 10- 4504 - 325 -30 1646 1116 121A39 04/18/89 16.32 ALTERNATOR REBUILD THERMOMETER 10 -4504- 560 -56 1642 9643 12 -1A39 ^4/25/89 78 78 ALTERNATOR- REBUILD PRING 1 -0 -4504- 560 -56 -1677 - -1279 121A39 04/25/89 101.30 ALTERNATOR REBUILD STARTER 10- 4540 - 560 -56 6879 1209 121A39 04/25/89 44.40 ALTERNATOR REBUILD STARTER PARTS 10 4540 560 56 770 1 - -121 A39-0 4/25/89 50,40 ALTERNATOR -- REBUILD CONTRACT - -ASSY -1-0-4S40- S60-S6-1P980 - 1 18 121A39 04/18/89 133.80 ALTERNATOR REBUILD PARTS BIN 40- 4504 - 803 -80 1644 997 575.90 * -- 121A41 - -- -04/25/89 145 -.55- - AMBASSADOR -- SAUSAGE- FOOD- - -E7- -4624- 663- 66----- - - - - -- - - -- 145.55 * 121A53 04/25/89 150.95 AMERICAN SHARECOM TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 - 150 -r95 121A60 04/18/89 427.30 ANCHOR PAPER 0203 ROLL TOWEL 10- 4514 - 520 -52 121 427.30 12 -1 -A67 n4 /�SlB9 130.. -00 AQUA_ENGINEERING PARTS- 10- 4504 - 318 -30 20439 - -111 121A67 04/25/89 121A67 04/25/89 * * * * ** 4 9 4 371 * ** -CKS 4_I 4i 4 �I * ** -CKS —.,I * ** -CKS I ,i 8 — * ** -CKS h -I 10.00 AQUA ENGINEERING PARTS 10- 4504 - 318 -30 20441 1122 = 27.67 AQUA ENGINEERING PARTS 10- 4504 - 318 -30 20440 1122 * ** -CKS 121803 04/18/89 19.13 BENSON SAFETY GLASSES 10- 4262 - 646 -64 14820 19.13 1989 OF EDINA CHECK STER 05-01-85 AGE 11 ------- CHECK -NO, -- DATE-------AMOUNT------------- - - - - -- VENDOR- - - - - -- - - - -- ITEM -- DESCRIP -T -ION— - ACCOUNT- .NO.- INV. - -# P.O. -# MESSAGE-------- - -- - %A 121830 04/25/89 45.29 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10-4516-440-44 457477 9906 124-B30 04A25/89 :3_97 BERTELSON-BROS—INC LABELS 1-0=4516=440-44-4577 -I3-9906 12I830 04/18/89 ***-CKS SERTELSON S 04/18/89 35.70 BACH-BILL UNIFORMS 30-4262-782-78 BERTELSON is 21 SOS 04 ol So'89---- 30-.-40-- BACH-BILL- -- - - - -- POSTAGE---- - - - - -- --30-429 121BOS 04/18/89 27.99 BACH-BILL GENERAL SUPPLYS 30-4504-781-78 9 121805 04/18/89 23.69 BACH-BILL GENERAL SUPPLYS 30-4504-782-78 o 21 B05— 04/- 19/89 7— BACH-BILL--- OFF-ICE--SUPPLYS 18646-..205 ; 12 121B07 04/18/89 1,483.22 BADGER METER INC WATER METER 40-1220-000-00 578366 1-r483; 17 Is ***-CKS 121810 04/20/89 84.00 BALDWIN SUPPLY CO. RELAY/HEATER 40-4540-801-80 256429 1187 84.00 ***-CKS -2-181-3 04/25/-&9 620--00 BARR-ENGINEERING—ENG-FOR-GOLF-COURSE-----Z7=4-300= 003-00 620:00 27 2fj 2o 121618 04/18/89 66.68 BATTERY WAREHOUSE BRAKE PADS 10-4540-560-56 31314 1184 31 —121-818 ------ - 04/48/ 43-9--99-.438---919-5a-- A-T-T-ER-Y-WAREHOUSP GOLF-CAR--T-IRES 4540- 665-66-3E312_1-079_--- 166.06.* -1- 121822 04/25/89 236.50 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 27-4630-663-66 --12-1 B22-------04/25/89- 41-2-70 PEER-WHOLESALERS--BEER �7=4630- 667-66 _81) 1 649.20 co 41 42 12IB27 04/25/89 157.00 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DEL 50-4626-822-82 ?-1-S2-7--04/?S/89 -389-1-00 BERGFORD-TRUCKING—LIQUOR-DEL 50- 4626-842=84 12I827 04/25/89 359.00 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DEL 50-46E6-86E-86 44 905.00 ***-CKS aD 121 -B30 -04/2-5/89 43-,-20--BERTELSON-BROS,--1 NC —MAP- BOOKS 1-0= 4504-440-44--457930---9906----- IPIB30 04/18/89 7.96 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLYS 10-4SO 4-490-49 5o! 12IB30 04/18/89 S7.60- BERTELSON BROS. INC. CREDIT .460276 10-4SO4-510-51 456439 521 1'21L @30 04/-18/89-- -57-60 BERTELSON-BROS-.-I NC -GEN -SUPPLYS__ 10-4504-51 O-Sl 1 1218:30 04/25/89 16.11 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES In-491A-44n-44 4AIPIR qql"t 121830 04/25/89 45.29 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10-4516-440-44 457477 9906 124-B30 04A25/89 :3_97 BERTELSON-BROS—INC LABELS 1-0=4516=440-44-4577 -I3-9906 12I830 04/18/89 10.00 SERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLYS E7-45I6-661-66 456538 12IB30 04/24/89 216.00 BERTELSON BROS. INC. BULLETIN BOARD 27-45I6-661-66 459296 7- a LJ 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -01 -89 PAGE 12 -- CHECK- NO —DA-.DA AMOUNT VENDOR - - - -- ITEM - DESCRIPTION— ACCOUNT-- NO.- -INV.- 4 P.O. N MESSAGE - -1 2 121B30 04/18/89 15.96 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICCE SUPPLYS 30 -4516- 781 -78 459275 1231 :3 3` 358..49 -* - --- - - -- -- ---------- - - - - -- - - -- - - 5 * ** -CKS J - 6 121B32 04/18/89 105.25 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS LOCKS 10- 4504 - 646 -64 91176 1108 s :c 121832 04/18/89 22.00 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 90689 9704 — * ** -CKS - -- -- 13 121B54 04/24/89 160.18 BLUMBERG PHOTO CABLE TV 10- 2149 - 000 -00 810646 1062 13 121B54 04/24/89 92.68 BLUMBERG PHOTO CABLE TV 10- 2149 - 000 -00 810690 1227 I6 - -- -- 252.86 -* - - - - -- - 2fl 17i ** *-CKS :a zJI 121B61 04/18/89 2G5.40 BOUSTEAD ELEC Q MFG. REPAIR FAN 10 -4248- 560 -56 256264 1185 121B61 04/20/89 1,292.30 BOUSTEAD ELEC 3 MFG. MOTOR REPAIR 40-4248- 801 -80 256512 1129,E 2,i 121 -B61 -04/20/89 3,- 924.20 - BOUSTEAD- ELEC -6- MFG -- REPAIR -- WELL -N2 40-4248- 801 -80- 25613 -9791 - -- -- - -- -- 12 5,481.90 * I;. 23 13, En 12 -1-862 04/ -1.8/ 9 442_ -62 POYUM- EQUI"Et+IT BROOM- STACK— "- 4534 -3-L0- 30_3529 1 020 251 442.62 * 27'* * *- CKS L' 121893 04/24/89 93.99 BUS RECORDS CORP. ELEC SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 184 -18 16119 1346 30 9:31-9-9-* - - -- - -- -- - - - -.. .. - - -- ;� 31 32 * * * * ** * ** -CKS I33 3 121B96 04/25/89 200.00 BUSINESSLAND INC. COMPUTER TRG 10- 4233 - 560 -56 120611 9811 35 121896 04/25/89 250.00 BUSINESSLAND INC. COMPUTER TRG 10-4233 - 560 -56 120611 9812 36 - -- 450- . -00 -* -- - -- - -- - - - - -- - 30 39 * * * * ** * ** -CKS S+,I 10 121CO2 04/25/89 27.00 C. F. ANDERSON REPAIR BP MONITOR 10 -4248- 440 -44 174194 1323 a' 27.00 -- - 112 a3 nn * ** -CKS 'I ' -' --- 121C08 04/20/89 767.38 CARLSON-LK-ST- EQUIP -. REPAIRS -- 10- 4248 - 560 -56 - 18236_- 9808 - - - - -- 96 121C08 04/18/89 31.28 CARLSON LK ST EQUIP. FUEL LINE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 50684 9970 ^- n' 121C08 04/18/89 32.66 CARLSON LK ST EQUIP. FUEL LINE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 50661 9970 a0 a 04418/8-9 I- 58 -_ -58 CARLSON -LK -ST- EQUIP- HYD_PJ1R_T -S 10 -4540- 560- 56 -S0250 9705._ — ° 989.90 0 * ** -CKS I$1I 52 * * * * ** - -- - - -- - - - - - -- - - — - -- - -- 53 121C14 04/24/89 125.49 CASWELL EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 29- 4248 - 722 -72 022412 1414 �+ sa 1 a5- -49. -* * * * * ** -- ---- - - - - -- — - -- -- * ** -CKS �- 1989, OF EDINA CHECK &STER 05-01-85 .•AGE 13 i2iG22 1pleae 04"187,89 i5.00 _385.57 eERT POWER TRAIN -TRAIN GREBET 10- 4540 560 56- CHECK-NO—DATE --- -AMOUNT--- VENDOR-- -----------I-TEM-DESCR I P-T-1 ON--ACCOUNT-NO,---1 NV_ # --P-. 0.- #-MESSAGE C 2 --368.57 eERT POWER 3 SOLENOIDS 10 4540 -560 56 53399 9973 - --------- 121 C17- 04/25/89 CDP---- ----SUPPLY- --I 0-4504-540-54 - - - --- - 121C17 04/18/89 135.00 CDP TONER 10- 4504-540 -54 101259 ***-CKS i2iG22 1pleae 04"187,89 i5.00 _385.57 eERT POWER TRAIN -TRAIN GREBET 10- 4540 560 56- -45E95 --- ***-CKS --368.57 eERT POWER SOLENOIDS 10 4540 -560 56 53399 9973 ***-CKS I C24 CREATI VE-- V I SUALS --INC ------ADVERT 181 NG-----— -30-4600-781-78 - 049 1 I_ 1230 471.68 L------ 121 -C25 04/-20/89 -176-.50— -CHAPIN-P-UBLISHING-CO--.-ADS-FOR--BIDS 1-0=421-0-1 40-14--97002 176.SO 6no 12IC28 04/18/89 201.86 l6e.ee CHEMSEARCH CLEANING SUPPLYS 30-45I2 -782-78 03421 271 ***—CKS 12IC33 04/25/89 27.10 CITY OF EDINA WATER 10-4258-540-54 12IC33 04/25/89 131.75 CITY OF EDINA WATER 10-4258-646-64 12I -C33 04/-25/-89 P_7_1-0 CZ-T-Y-0E-EDlNA__WATER- 18S.9s 32� 3 135 12IC36 04/18/89 36.75 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV WINDOW CLEANING 50-4248-841-84 I37 36--7S-* *w* -CKS 41 1e1060 04/18/89 22.50 CONSTR FASTENING SYS ANCHOR GUN PARTS 10-4504-646-64 11965 9965 42 l21c60 04/24/89 78.50 CONSTR FASTENING SYS PARTS 10-4504-646-64 12105 1198 49-7--25— CONSTR_FASTENING-SYS—NAILS 12IC60 04/24/89 6G.33- CONSTR FASTENING SYS CREDIT 10-4504-646-64 12104 121060 04/18/89 240.78 CONSTR FASTENING SYS NAIL LOADS 10-4540-520-52 12029 9946 121-C60 04/-18/-89- 275 -.00-- CONSTR-FASTENING-SYS----TOOLS- —1-0- 4580-644-64-12028 1,047.70 ae 51 04/18/89 34.75 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. PAINT 10-4620-560-56 35973 9871 6,634.75 I'l I . . I --***-CKS- 1 �57 121c92 04/20/89 132.00 CUSTOM FIRE App TAGS 10-4504-440-44 00e567 9198 41 X42 43 -- 3_I - - - - -- - -- - * * *- CKS - - -.,.. 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 3 � 05 -01 -89 PAGE 14 317.15 EARL F. ANDERSON SIGNS 27- 4504 - 664 -66 86921 1421 317 -1-s 1F - CHECK -NO. -DATE AMOUNT- -- VENDOR - - -- -- ITEM -- DESCRIPTION - ACCOUNT-- NO— INV. -N P.O. # MESSAGE - - -- _l 2 132.00 * * ** -CKS 3�- 4� 85.00 ECOLAB PEST ELIM. SERVICES CONTRACTS 30- 4288 - 782 -78 80285 * ** -CKS 85.00 6 121 -C97 04/-20/$9 735 -. -00 CYLINDER --CLT-Y HYD - -CYL 1 -0- 4540 - 560 -56- 23155 - --1 139 - -- 7 - - - - - - -- - * ** -CKS � 735.00 04/- 18/89 -- 226 -.24 FIDE- SAW -d- -KNIFE SAW -- BLADES— 10-4504- 440 -44 52090 -.9727 . -. -. - - - - - -- . -- ' ei 04/18/89 28.00 EIDE SAW d KNIFE SHARPEN BLADES 10- 4580 - 301 -30 51858 3727 254.24 * ** -CKS 121D03 04/25/89 225.70 D d V SALES GEN SUPPLYS 30- 4504 - 782 -78 36291 1066 ,4 12 ;si nl 4 ,5 * ** -CKS ,9 16_ 121D07 04/25/89 1,000.00 D. C. HEY CO. FAX MACHINE 10- 4901 - 540 -54 104886 9770 2' 17 121D07 04/25/89 148.00 D. C. HEY CO. COPY SUPPLYS 30- 4516 - 781 -78 107406 1246 18 1- p-LDn? Oq/ ?4"pa 850-00 D r HEY rn FAX- MACHINE 40- 4504-8.03 -8.0- 104886_9770 - _ 2 201 1.998.00 * 0 27 i z i 23 121D33 04/25/89 199.50 DAVIS - EUGENE WEED INSPECTION 10- 4201 - 600 -60 z4 1.P -tD33 0- 4/25489 38-88 DNVIS- EUGENE MILEAGE + 0 -4208- 6.0.0 -60 —..__ 35i 238.38 • 41 X42 43 * ** -CKS * * * * ** ^1 42-1 -E75 04/4 -8/-89 230-00 EMPLOYEES -CLUB SUPPLIES— l -0- 4504 - 50.0 -50 -- - `' 230.00 _ * ** -CKS -- _. I'Zl E81 04/18/89 71.82 * ENGINE PARTS SUPPLY PARTS - - -- - 10 -4540- 560 -56 102364 9730 121 53 * * * * ** * ** -CKS ,71 54 -, 55 IF 5CI i� 121F02 04/18/89 70.88 FACILITY SYSTEMS REMODELING 70.88 * 25- 4924 - 520 -52 36153 1237 -- 3_I - - - - -- - -- - * * *- CKS - - -.,.. 3 � 121E14 04/25/89 317.15 EARL F. ANDERSON SIGNS 27- 4504 - 664 -66 86921 1421 317 -1-s * ** -CKS 121E20 04/25/89 85.00 ECOLAB PEST ELIM. SERVICES CONTRACTS 30- 4288 - 782 -78 80285 85.00 * * * * ** — - - - - - - -- - * ** -CKS � - 121E54 04/- 18/89 -- 226 -.24 FIDE- SAW -d- -KNIFE SAW -- BLADES— 10-4504- 440 -44 52090 -.9727 . -. -. - - - - - -- . -- ' 121E54 04/18/89 28.00 EIDE SAW d KNIFE SHARPEN BLADES 10- 4580 - 301 -30 51858 3727 254.24 * ** -CKS * * * * ** ^1 42-1 -E75 04/4 -8/-89 230-00 EMPLOYEES -CLUB SUPPLIES— l -0- 4504 - 50.0 -50 -- - `' 230.00 _ * ** -CKS -- _. I'Zl E81 04/18/89 71.82 * ENGINE PARTS SUPPLY PARTS - - -- - 10 -4540- 560 -56 102364 9730 121 53 * * * * ** * ** -CKS ,71 54 -, 55 IF 5CI i� 121F02 04/18/89 70.88 FACILITY SYSTEMS REMODELING 70.88 * 25- 4924 - 520 -52 36153 1237 v i i i i i 1989 OF EDINA CHECK STER 05 -01 -8. ,AGE 15 ECK -WO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR I-TEM- DESCRIPTI-0N ACCOUNT -NO- INV,- *- P- .O, -N- MESSA6E 2 J I, * + *� *� - -- __ _ -__ __ ... - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - -- - ---------- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - -- - - -- -- - -- - - - -- - - - - - - -- ----- --. — -- ------ J+ 117.00 * 14 `J2 33 4 * * *.- CKS. —_�4 34 14 �36 121G24 04/18/89 19.00 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS RENTAL 10 -4226- 301 -30 30672 I4 4/25 /-S9 70 40 GEN- .-COMMUNICAT -IONS GE- REPAIR 10- 4248-440 -44 -- 47916 -1325 4 121624 04/25/89 105.60 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS ANTENNA 10-4294 - 560-56 47771 36 39 121624 04/23/89 105.60 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS ANTENNA 10-4294 - 360-56 4777E s 1 -2 1G24- X4/25/89 56 - -7 -0 GEN — COMMUNICATIONS RADIO - REPAIR 1 -0 =4274- 560 -56 -47773 no 4+ 121G24 04/18/89 266.25 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS RADIO SERVICE 10 -4294- 560 -56 30671 623.55 42 6 43 * * * * ** * ** -CKS Is 44 5 - 12 -1G26 94/24/89 24 -00- GENERAL- --OFF- ICE -PROD CREDIT— 1 -0- 4504-420 -42 e 46 121G26 04/24/89 12.00 GENERAL OFFICE PROD GENERAL SUPPLIES 10-4504- 420 -42 c tea? 121G26 04/25/59 31.17 GENERAL OFFICE PROD GEN SUPPLYS 10- 4504-420 -42 6 IL 2- tG26- 4/20.-89 '^ i4�ENERAL- OF -FICE -PROD SUPPLYS 10-4504- 420 -4 6 49 121G26 04/20/89 17.88- GENERAL OFFICE PROD CREDIT 10- 4504-420 -42 e 51 so 121G26 04/25/89 60.21 GENERAL OFFICE PROD GEN SUPPLYS 10- 4504- 420 -42 6 - 12 -1-626 �0- 412SA89- 145:56 GENERAL - OFFICE -PROD GENERA"U YS 2S= 4504 -702 -70 I6 S2 121G26 04/20/89 125.30 GENERAL OFFICE PROD SUPPLYS 28-4504 - 702 -70 , �3a 312.70 * 7 ss * * * * ** 56 * ** -CKS , n -MA&JU_l1NC eI�MJR�11R— MUSE &AkIGG 99 —dS2 ?AAA— ?A_- .TAd ?d 19RZ - _.._ ____. __ _.... • • +* -CKS e 1 121F08 0 04/24/89 4 49.00 F FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL P PROF SERVICES 1 10 -4201- 420 -42 e e 9-00 * e e 26 * * ** -CKS + + 1:0 1 121F11 0 04/18/89 8 81.00 F FEED RITE CONTROL B BREAL TANK 4 40- 4622- 805 -80 1 120016 1130 ; ; 121F11 0 04/18/89 8 81.00- F FEED RITE CONTROL B BREAL TANK 4 40- 4622- 805 -80 1 120016 1130 �12 1 ka Fl l 0 04" f8° 8 84-00 F FE D-RITE - 60NTROL B BREAK SANK 4 40� °62 845= � ��40a 6�i 30 + + .3 k +s 2 17 2 121F19 0 04/18/89 1 11198.25 F FIRST TRUST F FISCAL AGENT 1 10- 1145 - 000 -00 2 2 19 1 1F-19 ^4/-1-8/89 1 1 ,T19� -50 F FIRST CRUST F FISCAL -AGENT 1 1 -0= 445- 000 -00 z z 121F19 0 04/18/89 1 11099.25 F FIRST TRUST F FISCAL AGENT 2 27- 4300 - 661 -66 2 2 201 1 121F19 0 04/18/89 9 912.50 F FIRST TRUST F FISCAL AGENT 6 66- 4298 - 000 -00 2 2 21 1 '- x329 -50 - - - - -- a 23 + * * * +* * * ** -CKS J J 26 1 121F47 0 04/18/89 1 108.53 F FOWLER ELECTRIC R REPAIR PARTS 1 10- 4540 - 560 -56 8 88655 9881 I I, 127 1 108.53 + 2B * 29 * * * * ** * ** *—CKS � �3 30 3 2 70 0 04e24<89 1 11 00 G GAr*_DEN ALCATEL M MAINTENANCE 1 10- 429-0- 51 -0-5-1 1 1413 3 1989 CITY OF EDINA 3 —_ -_- 4 NI IR lk * Ik # 6 236.67 * CHECK REGISTER 05 -01 -89 PAGE 16 TEM- DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT-NO -INV. #- P.O. # MESSAGE - -_ J 2 l 3 i -- — - -— *** —CKS 3I 3 12 -1 -G44 �04+�c5/89 50700 GLEN - IP-E- P- IANO-SERV SERVICES - CONTRACT 30- 4288-782-78 -- 890424 -1471 - _ 0 50.00 * - -- I'o 121G57 04/20/89 2� 13 1 14 d 19 z3 zl� 22 23 gal .G. 121G60 *+h * *1k IF 04/18/89 226.56 GOPHER OIL CO. GEN SUPP OIL 496.76 496.76 GORDON SMITH CO GASOLINE - -- -121 G68 04/25/89 110-.S9 - GRAYBAR- ELECTRIC - CO -. -- FLASHL I TES- - 121GG6 04/0/89 443.56 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. PARTS 121G68 04/20/89 28.81 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. REPAIR PARTS 1 - - * ** -CKS -. 28- 4504 - 702 -70 367995 1080 sl ** *-CKS 9I 2 27- 4612 - 664 -66 1363 1242 21, 23, 2.1 *** —CKS '_, c11 1 -0- 4504 -- 301 --30 817445 9572 - -- - - - -- 10 -4540- 520 -52 816028 1143 10- 4540 - 560 -56 818020 3I I� * ** -CKS 1284 *** -CKS - 129 121G96 04/25/89 42.67 GUY SPEAKER CO. PAARTS 40-4540 - 801 -80 42.67 13� 1311 +k * NI M NI IM 32 I3_ - 121H09- -04/0/89- 1,- 348.10- - - - - -- HALLMAN -LUB OIL- - 34 121H09 04/25/89 114.00 HALLMAN TURBINE OIL 3s 1,462.10 J9 39 --- 12f -Hf 9- 4l- f8/ -89 1 f 20 HAR -NEO LUMBER -CO -. MATERIALS -- 40 121H19 04/18/89 22.80 HAR NED LUMBER CO. MATERIALS j61 121H19 04/18/89 57.50 HAR NED LUMBER CO. WALL ANGLE I42 9- 1750 -* 44 45 121H21 04/18/89 192.48 HARMON GLASS GLASS 46 121H21 04/18/89 35.44 HARMON GLASS GLASS 10 -4618- 560 -56- 43694 - -1188 40- 4540- 801 -80 43916 1200 10- 4540 - 520 -52 37178- 9618 10- 4540 - 520 -52 037377 9732 10- 4540 - 560 -56 37123 9607 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS -I 10 -4248- 560 -56 182970 9805 - - - -- .,I 46 10- 4540 - 560 -56 182876 9558 - 51 * * * * ** *** —CKS I2r 121H28 04/24/89 86.35 HAYDEN— MURPHY EQUIP ESTIMATE 10 -4248- 646 -64 101322 1312 ` 53 86.35 * � 11 54 _- ;.s' * * * * ** * ** -CKS sl;i, 1 `' — 12- 1- H3- 1--- -04/4 -8/$9- 40 43 -- -- HOLMSTEN -ICE- -RINKS - - - -- GENERAL. SUP-P_LYS - -30- 4504 - 782 -78- - -. 1255 - � . | ' ! 1989' c' OF soIwA cnscw K. 'aTsn os-V,-ey "os 17 (.� CHECK NO _ - AMOUNT ` 40.43 * | ------'---------��---------�-'------------ '-------------�—�' — ----------'---------- — / 1eI*32 0*/24/e9 31.*e osoGsa-oIAwA uumrnAuT nEpAzea e3-*e4e-61e-61 1e1*32 04/2*/89 31.4s *sooso-ozAwA oprIcs ouppLIso 23-4sI6-611-61 }' �e�n��-----o+��*�uy----''�------�yy�a+------'*soGso-oxAwA ----�- --'- Ac cnApr owppLzso------eo-*saa-a11-a1 |' e6e.11 * !a�---*^*~*~-- --------------------------'---------------- - ------- ------ ~ '1 121H56 0 04/1e/89 o os.yo n nznonFzsLna P PAINT 1 10-45*0-5e0-se * *4ss57 1 101* [! 121*s6 0 04/ia/e9 5 5*.96 n nxnS*rzsLow S STAIN - -10-4s*0-Sao-se 4 434039 9 9737 |� 1e1*s6 0 0*/18/e9 s s3.16 o ozns*FIsLow p pRxmsm 1 10-4540-5e0-sa * **s47e y ynro 121H56 0 04/2s/89 7 7e.99 n nzno*pzsLoa P PAINT 1 10-+s*0-san-se 4 4*so14 1 1137 04/1e/89 eo.sw *umpnmsr nAoI*ron espAIno 10-+ewe-s60-s6 12v*85 o+/es/nn 208.50 nump*msr n*ozwrnm mAuzoTon vn-+swu-saw-sa | - ---------- ---------------'--asr.nw'* |=` ---------------- ------� --'---------'------- — - -- - - ai.en- zwL*mo Teunw pTo nnsoIr vn-*s*n-san-sa . ` 2 � va�zes o��,o�ny v*s ve INLAND reucw pTo *xLs pwnrs 10-*5*0-560-56 . "'12s---- -68.49--- -ae.wy'------zwLAmo rnunw pTo---' AXLE pwnTs | 121125 04,18/89 e53.so zmLAmo Tmwcm pra TRANS pAnrs 10-4540-560-55 / | '�| ****** . / [' 1e1149 04/18/89 -- - 44. SS -- zwmAc - - zwwJsT wuppLrS 10-*sm4-sIo-51 ' |~\ 4*.5s * ~i 12C. )`7 ~ �e�zs9 04/e+/89 a*.sw zwTsnzon com oYo. p*nws mwImT 10-*e74-4e0-4e / |^] �--- ---------- — --------- o*��e�ay ns.su ze uonmaom aup auppLYo 10-*sw4-6*6-6* / ' ys.90 * | ------ / 4c ****** n=ws#w-wwo=**_ - r---4124-J3 I_ 04/24/89 ERR-YS-HARDWARE_GEN- SUPPLYS 10_4504=301�30_ If. .� '- - ***-nwo- .'~ ***-cwa I 1 19 ` 1293 ^. r/ ***-nwa '| 0816 9866 �0710 nnaa 069e 9804 'na,r sn*a ,|~ ***-nnS ~/ '! /wosan 11*8 �! � `.~ !363w ° --�� ___� —.=| = ***-cwn ' nnas yoay .� ***-nwa "1 '| ~ ***-owa n|� p |"� | '�| ****** . / [' 1e1149 04/18/89 -- - 44. SS -- zwmAc - - zwwJsT wuppLrS 10-*sm4-sIo-51 ' |~\ 4*.5s * ~i 12C. )`7 ~ �e�zs9 04/e+/89 a*.sw zwTsnzon com oYo. p*nws mwImT 10-*e74-4e0-4e / |^] �--- ---------- — --------- o*��e�ay ns.su ze uonmaom aup auppLYo 10-*sw4-6*6-6* / ' ys.90 * | ------ / 4c ****** n=ws#w-wwo=**_ - r---4124-J3 I_ 04/24/89 ERR-YS-HARDWARE_GEN- SUPPLYS 10_4504=301�30_ If. .� '- - ***-nwo- .'~ ***-cwa I 1 19 ` 1293 ^. r/ ***-nwa '| 0816 9866 �0710 nnaa 069e 9804 'na,r sn*a ,|~ ***-nnS ~/ '! /wosan 11*8 �! � `.~ !363w ° --�� ___� —.=| = ***-cwn ' nnas yoay .� ***-nwa "1 '| ~ ***-owa n|� p |"� If. .� '- - ***-nwo- .'~ ***-cwa I 1 19 ` 1293 ^. r/ ***-nwa '| 0816 9866 �0710 nnaa 069e 9804 'na,r sn*a ,|~ ***-nnS ~/ '! /wosan 11*8 �! � `.~ !363w ° --�� ___� —.=| = ***-cwn ' nnas yoay .� ***-nwa "1 '| ~ ***-owa n|� p |"� -i • 1I . Li 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -01 -89 PAGE 18 I, ,r CHECK- NO_DATE AMOUNT .- VENDOR - -- ITEM - DESCRIPTION - ACCOUNT -NO. -- INV -. - # P.O.- M MESSAGE - - ' 121J35 121J31 04/24/89 25.81 JERRYS HARDWARE GEN SUPPLYS 10- 4504- 32S -30 I` 121J35 -- 121 J31 - -- 04/24/89 ------24. 94 - -- - JERRYS HARDWARE -- GEN SUPPLYS ---- - - - - -1 0- 4504 - 390 -30 zoo -- 121J31 04/24/89 46.18 JERRYS HARDWARE GEN SUPPLYS 10- 4504-390 -30 _ 5 5 B * * * * ** 121J31 04/24/99 1.98 JERRYS HARDWARE GEN SUPPLYS 10- 4504- 420 -42 7 I 121J47 12LJ31 04l_-'4l99 57 --1 -1 JERRYS-HARDWARE SNOW REMOVAL GEN SUPPLYS 10- 4504 - 440 -44 - - 121J31 04/24/89 5.90 JERRYS HARDWARE GEN SUPPLYS 10- 4504 - 480 -48 I34 x. 35 * * * * ** 121J31 04/24/89 77.94 JERRYS HARDWARE GEN SUPPLYS 10- 4504 - 520 -52 C 121 -J74 - I 21J31- 4/24/89 - -31.46 JERRYS- HARDWARE -- -GEN- SUPPLYS - -l0- -4504- 540-54 - V-30 121J74 121J31 04/24/39 94.32 JERRYS HARDWARE GEN SUPPLYS 10- 4504 - 560 -56 121J74 121J31 04/24/89 87.22 JERRYS HARDWARE GEN SUPPLYS 10- 4504- 646 -64 13i �- 121 -J31 04/24/89 50.-44 JERRYS -- HARDWARE - GEN -- SUPPLYS '-0- 4504 - 782 -78 -- 121J31 04/24/89 7.40 JERRYS HARDWARE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520-52 ,S 121J31 04/24/89 23.78 JERRYS HARDWARE TOOLS 10 -4580- 301 -30 --- iei 12 -1J31 04/24/89 31 -.02 - JERRYS - HARDWARE -- - -GEN SUPPLYS -- ---27- 4504 - 665 -66 -- 121J31 04/24/89 9.53 JERRYS HARDWARE GEN SUPPLYS 27- 4504 - 667 -66 04/24/89 36.28 JERRYS HARDWARE TOOLS 27- 4580 - 664 -66 ('121J31 QL �I 12.1J3J 04/-24/89 84 -_29 JERRYS-HARDWARE GEN-SUPPLYS 28- 4504 -702-70__ 121J31 04/24/89 48.18 JERRYS HARDWARE GEN SUPPLYS 40- 4504 - 801 -80 21 121J31 04/24/89 30.49 JERRYS HARDWARE REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 802 -80 834 -1-1 -* -- ,I 0 _ � I "I ;^I -- --- --------- - -- - -- - nl s: * ** -CKS a 121K09 04/18/89 7.86 KAMAN BEARING & SPLY PULLEY 10 -4504- 646 -64 660309 9771 121K09 04/18/89 37.00 KAMAN BEARING 6 SPLY SEALS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 660697 9884 LI 121J35 04/18/89 288.00 JERRYS PRINTING POOL SEASON TICKETS 26- 4214 - 681 -68 5460 4131 121J35 04/24/89 65.95 JERRYS PRINTING BUSINESS CARD 29- 4504 - 722 -72 5825 1415 zoo -- KNOX 353 -95 CO. REPAIR PARTS - - -- 121K35 04/24/89 - - --- - .. - - -- -- _3 * * * * ** CO. MISC HARDWARE 511--- 121K35 04/-18/89 1- 8.89 -- -KNOX- * ** -CKS CO.---.---- 121J47 04/18/89 380.00 JERRYS LSCAPE MAINT SNOW REMOVAL 50- 4248 - 841 -84 6517 CO. MISC HARDWARE - 380.00 - - -- 36.89 KNOX LUMBER CO. MATERIAL I34 x. 35 * * * * ** 1.21.K35 .04/-25/8.9 49 -.44 -- - - - _ - -- 'I * ** -CKS 3�1 121 -J74 04/- 18/89 59..33 JUSTUS_LUMBER LUMBER TOOLS_- __ 10- 4540 - 520 -52 76916_9640 V-30 121J74 04/18/89 165.85 JUSTUS LUMBER MATERIALS 10- 4540-520 -52 78165 9807 `I 121J74 04/18/89 58.23 JUSTUS LUMBER PAINT /LUMBER 30- 4544 - 782 -78 87G46 1243 ao 7 ?' A2 * ** -CKS 121K09 04/18/89 7.86 KAMAN BEARING & SPLY PULLEY 10 -4504- 646 -64 660309 9771 121K09 04/18/89 37.00 KAMAN BEARING 6 SPLY SEALS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 660697 9884 LI t 10- 4504 - 318 -30 439559 1191 10- 4504 - 646 -64 439424 1203 10- 4504- 646 -64 445865 1123 10 -4504- 646 -64 410840 1117 10 -4540- 520 -52 439629 9882 10. -4540- S20 -52 439516 1212 10- 4540 - 520 -52 439411 1179 10- 4540 - 520 -52 439785 9966 * ** -CKS 1711 - -- - -'. I' 4131 4t' 121K35 04/2S/89 115.90 KNOX LUMBER CO. REPAIR PARTS 121K35 04/24/89 22.79 2297 KNOX LUMBER CO. MISC HARDWARE 511--- 121K35 04/-18/89 1- 8.89 -- -KNOX- LUMBER CO.---.---- REPAIRS -- �;2 121K35 04/24/89 13.94 KNOX LUMBER CO. MISC HARDWARE 121K35 04/18/89 36.89 KNOX LUMBER CO. MATERIAL - 55F J�6 1.21.K35 .04/-25/8.9 49 -.44 .KNOX-LUMBER--CO..- MATERIAL 121K35 04/25/89 51.45 KNOX LUMBER CO. MATERIAL 121K35 04/18/89 58.95 KNOX LUMBER CO. MATERIAL t 10- 4504 - 318 -30 439559 1191 10- 4504 - 646 -64 439424 1203 10- 4504- 646 -64 445865 1123 10 -4504- 646 -64 410840 1117 10 -4540- 520 -52 439629 9882 10. -4540- S20 -52 439516 1212 10- 4540 - 520 -52 439411 1179 10- 4540 - 520 -52 439785 9966 * ** -CKS 1711 - -- - -'. I' 1989 1. OF EDINA 2 CHECK ►, .STER 05 -01 -89 AGE 19 , - DESCRIP -T4ON ACCOUNT -NO - INV- .- M- P.O -. -M - MESSAGE , �lz 3 l ldlK.55 u uq/18/59 3 30.00- K KNOX LUMBER CO. M MATERIAL 1 10-4S40-S20-S2 4 439632 9 9883 ' 3 �r � i. 121M09 04/25/89 15,000.00 15,000.00 MARQUETTE BANK MISC 05 -01 -89 PAGE 20 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER ^' -- 121M19 04/18/89— AMOUNT - -- - VENDOR ITEM- DESCRIPTION— ACCOUNT- NO.- - -INV. H P.O. M MESSAGE 0---CHECK-NO—DATE 04/18/89 134.79 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY TOOLS 10- 4580 - 560 -56 121M19 04/18/89 500.71 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 54 1,239-40 121L30 04/24/89 385.00 LAYNE MINNESOTA CO. CHEMICAL PUMP 40- 4540 - 805 -80 10819 1283 3l 31 � 740 -00 -* 'I "5 _e * * * * ** * ** -CKS 0 121L46 04/25/89 27.75 LIEN INFECTION CON CLEANING 27- 4201- 663 -66 ,I 9 121L46 04/25/89 27.75 LIEN INFECTION CON CLEANING 27- 4201 - 663 -66 55- .- 50 - * -- -- - G I I * ** -CKS r, .s 14. 121L5G 04/25/89 19.70 LINHOFF FILM DEVELOPING 10 -4504- 260 -26 150293 15 121L56 04/25/89 7.00 LINHOFF PHOTO FINISHING 10 -4508- 440 -44 149967 - Is - -1$ -1 L5G 04/25/99- 9, 85 -L-I NHOFF - -0FF-I CE-- SUPPLYS- 30- 451-6- 781-78 148837-1469 -- - - -- -- 36.55 ,a ` 121L60 04/24/89 2,638.04 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 10- 4233 - 160 -16 ----- 121L60 04/24/89 3,7- 99 -. -90 — LOGIS- -- — DATA- PROCESSING 10- 4233 - 200 -20- ---- . - - - - -- -- z 121L60 04/24/89 3,136.17 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 10- 4233 - 420-42 121L60 04/24/89 1,702.46 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 40- 4233 - 800 -80 311 j24 — 121.L6.0 04/24/89 31- 9-_33 LOGIS DATA - PROCESSING 50- 4233 - 820 -82 - - -__- —_ 121LGO 04/24/89 319.33 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 50- 4233 - 840 -84 121L60 04/24/89 319.34 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 50- 4233- 860-86 Iz� - -- tP 234 -57--* - i 121L80 04/24/89 229.94 LYNDALE GARDEN CTR CUSHIONS FOR CHAIRS 27- 4504 - 662 -66 15832 ** *-CKS 1173 33 229.94 * •i 1l 1�5 * ** -CKS I — 1- 2-iL82 04/- 19/-89 a5_73 LYNDALE- HARDWARE- GENERAL_SUP-PLIES— 30- 4504-782 -78- 299405 -12G4 ' Igo 25.73 * - - -- 39-- - - - - -- * ** -CKS `401 2 121M05 04/18/89 20.00 MAMA MAMA MTG 10- 4206 - 140 -14 n 43 — 20 -00_* - - - -- - - - - l4a Ins * * * * #* * ** -CKS 'G .4] InG 121M09 04/25/89 15,000.00 15,000.00 MARQUETTE BANK MISC 10 -1090- 000 -00 40 50 * * * * ** ^' -- 121M19 04/18/89— 2,603.90— -- MCGUIRE -AUTO- SUPPLY- - - - - -- REPAIR-- PAR.TS--- -__. -_ _.. -.10- 4540 - 560- 56- - -..._ '1253 121M19 04/18/89 134.79 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY TOOLS 10- 4580 - 560 -56 121M19 04/18/89 500.71 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 54 1,239-40 * ** -CKS `41 I 1711 * ** -CKS i 1989 OF EDINA CHECK STER 05 -01 -8: AGE 21 * * *- CKS - 4� CHECK -NO — DATE -- -- AMOUNT - -- ------VENDOR- ------ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT -NO. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE I10 121M31 -- 04/24/89 — 7.70 METRO - FONE- -COMM. — -- EQUIP- MAINT -- 10 -4226- 420 -42 J q 121 M22 - - - 04/18/8 9 - — - - - -- 416. 16 — - — MCNE ILUS STEEL - - STEEL FOR TARGETS - -- - - - -10- 4504 - 420 -42 76384 9793 303779 , 41 v 42 416.16 62.50 *** -CKS 121M23— 04/24/89 - - - -- - - - -- 195. -00 - MARKETING FACTORS-- - - - - -- -PRO SERVICES----- - - -50- 4201 - 820 -82 0 121M23 04/24/89 195.00 MARKETING FACTORS PRO SERVICES 50- 4201 - 840 -84 SSEWER- SERV-- CHG----- - - -40- 4312- 812 -80- 6629 - -- 121M23 04/24/89 196.00 MARKETING FACTORS PRO SERVICES 50- 4201- 860 -86 ! 0 'e--- 86.-00-*-- - -- ,I- �." I2 -4-2TM36 ^4.48/89 41-48 MLNVALCO PARTS * ** -CKS ai • 121M25 04/25/89 82.62 MED OXYGEN 3 EQUIP BREATHING AIR 10 -4274- 440 -44 1324 121M25 04/25/89 119.25 MED OXYGEN 6 EQUIP BREATHING AIR 10- 4274 - 440 -44 1324 - - 121M25 - - - -- 04/25/89 -- - -- - - -- 32i83-------MED OXYGEN & EQUIP--- - -- OXYGEN - - - -- - - - - -- -- - - -1 0- 451 -0- 440 -44- - 1324 " .iio MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 234.70 001004 �33I a �21M42 I° - - — -- -028 1103 -- - - - ---- -- -- * ** -CKS -, 121M27 04/25/89 191.45 MERIT SUPPLY SUPPLYS 10- 4504 - 390 -39 21489 1273 121M27- 04/25/89 -- -- 189:90 MERIT - SUPPLY - - - - -- CLEANING - SUPPLIES— - 10-4504- 646 -64 21519 1274 -- * *ww►* I" 121M27 04/25/89 480.80 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 21488 1277 121M27 04/18/89 133.60 MERIT SUPPLY PAINT 10- 4540- 520 -52 21369 9976 I2S, — 121M27- ^4/25/89 2,-1-45. -00 MERIT-- SUPPLY- WEED _KILLER 10 -4566- 643 -G4- 21517 -1340 . 121M27 04/25/89 424.50 MERIT SUPPLY SUPPLY 10-4620 - 560 -56 21501 1290 v, 121M27 04/18/89 495.00 MERIT SUPPLY WASH /WAX 10- 4620- 560 -56 21322 9772 - -- 121M27 - - - - -- 04/18/89 -- - -- - - - 467.50 -- - - -- MERIT SUPPLY -- -- - CLEANER --------- - - - - -- 10- 4620 - 560 -56 21356 9950 .9 121M27 04/25/89 495.00 MERIT SUPPLY WASH /WAX 10- 4620 - 560 -56 21409 1111 121M27 04/25/89 467.50 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANER 10- 4620 - 560 -56 21408 1110 12-1M27 04/25/89 — 246.-00 MERI -T- SUPPLY - - -._ —MATS - - -__— —27- 4504 - 662 -66 21487 - 1061 . -- 121M27 04/20/89 439.20 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 28- 4512 - 702 -70 21424 1186 121M27 04/18/89 499.35 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLYS 30-4512-782 -78 21413 1149 - 121M27 04/25/89 - -- 195:00 -- MERI-T- SUPPLY - - -- HTH - 40-4504-803 -80 21500 1298 121M27 04/18/89 480.00 MERIT SUPPLY MEMBRANES 40- 4540-801 -80 21346 9781 �35 1 7,349.80 * * *- CKS - I10 121M31 -- 04/24/89 — 7.70 METRO - FONE- -COMM. — -- EQUIP- MAINT -- 10 -4226- 420 -42 300531 - - - " - -- 121M31 04/18/89 54.80 METRO FONE COMM. PAGER RENTAL 40- 4504- 801 -80 303779 , 41 v 42 62.50 *** -CKS - -121 M35 - - - -- 04/-18/89 - 220, 257 . -78- - METRO- WASTE - CONTROL ------ SSEWER- SERV-- CHG----- - - -40- 4312- 812 -80- 6629 - -- i 220,257.78 'e--- -4-2TM36 ^4.48/89 41-48 MLNVALCO PARTS 1 -0- 4540-560-56- 903183 -9959 30 1 41.48 * , �31 ,ZI --; * * * ** *** -CKS � . - -- -- 121M42 04/18/89 140.55 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 301 -30 001004 �33I a �21M42 04l20/S9 233_07 MIDWEST ASP-HALI -COR. ASP -HALT 10-4524-30 -1 =30--1 -028 1103 -- -- - ") " 373.62 13 � I -- * *ww►* - -- -- _. *** -CKS -- . 13 �''� 121M58 04/20/89 493.81 MILLIPORE LAB SUPPLYS 10- 4504 - 4$2-4$ 34843 1989 CITY OF EDINA - -- CHECK REGISTER 493: $1 - *- 05 -01 -89 PAGE 22 I � I CHECK -NO —DATE AMOUNT — VENDOR ITEM- DESCRIP -TION ACCOUNT- NO.-- INV -.- B P.O. # MESSAGE_ . I3 ---- 121M44 - -- -- 04/25/89— 33030 -- MIDWEST- CHEM - SUPPLY- - - -- - PAPER- TIWELS --- - - -10- 4514- 520 -52 23881 9988 4 2 12-1 -M8.0 330.30 + -4-1-8-1 4—MN-SUBURBAN-NEWS + ++ -CKS ,9i i. 04/25/89 359.15 MN. CELLULAR TEL. MOBIL PHONE 10- 4204- 140 -14 807727 87.23 + + ++ -CKS - - -� 7 04/25/89 359.15- MN. CELLULAR TEL. PHONE 10-4204- 140 -14 807727 = a 121M46 04/25/89 20.74 METZ BAKING CO BREAD 27 -4624- 663 -66 f9-- 12 -IM46 04/25/89 38.. -72 METZ- BAKING -CO BREAD 27- 4624 - 663- 66--- - - - - -- - 10 nc 121M81 59.4G 6,532.00 MN. TORO INC. NEW MOWER 27- 1340 - 000 -00 CKS -- 121M81 04/20/89 27.61 MN. �12[ MOWER PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 1118 - - -- - + ++ -CKS 13 �''� 121M58 04/20/89 493.81 MILLIPORE LAB SUPPLYS 10- 4504 - 4$2-4$ 34843 1059 - - -- I1.0 493: $1 - *- - 208.70 - - -- -- - - -- - - - _ - -- - ,c; 11.31 121M80 04/18/89 239.61- MN SUBURBAN NEWS :7 * + *+ 5i 2 12-1 -M8.0 0444 -8/89 -4-1-8-1 4—MN-SUBURBAN-NEWS + ++ -CKS ,9i 121M68 04/25/89 359.15 MN. CELLULAR TEL. MOBIL PHONE 10- 4204- 140 -14 807727 87.23 + * 121M68 04/25/89 359.15- MN. CELLULAR TEL. PHONE 10-4204- 140 -14 807727 = -- 041 251-89 400-. 42 1-0- 4226 - 420- 42--- - - - - -- I V 1 `2 -'23 - 28 -. -83- 400.42 + BUSHINGS- 1.0- 4540 - 560 -56- 743910 9725 - - - - -- - - - - -- nc 121M81 04/20/89 6,532.00 MN. TORO INC. NEW MOWER 27- 1340 - 000 -00 CKS -- 121M81 04/20/89 27.61 MN. TORO INC. MOWER PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 1118 121M70 04/20/89 59.00 MN. CONWAY RECHARGE FEES 10-4274- 440 -44 130176 1319 271--- 121M70 04/24/89 54,-00- MNT-- CONWAY RECHARGE- EXTUNG 2T- 4642 - 66]-66 - 128840- -1410 71 as 746641 1228 113.00 + 121M81 04/20/89 9.89- MN. �r CREDIT 27- 4540 - 664-66 C92691 I',' _- 1'21 H$1 04!24/ -84 140_00— -MN_- 30 3i -- BLOWER -- -27- 4580-664 -66 1221 . - - +rt+ -CKS - I !. 3z 121M76 04/1$!89 $5.97 MN. GLOVE BOOTS 10-4504- 301 -30 29$47 9877 J3� - - - -1 21 M7fi - 04/25/89 35. 68 - -- MN -. GLOVE — -- GLOVES -- -- 10-4504-301-30 30498 1287 '4I 121M78 04/18/89 15.60 MN. GLOVE BOOTS 10-4504 - 560 -56 30115 9877 121M76 04/25/89 58.10 MN. GLOVE BOOTS 40- 4504- 801-80 30123 8520 3 - - - -1- 95..25 -+ -- - - - - -- - -— -- I_-_ v 3nl 0 1 + * + + ++ + ++ -CKS I1.0 121M80 04/18/89 208.70 MN SUBURBAN NEWS LEGAL PUBLICATION 10 -4210- 140 -14 11.31 121M80 04/18/89 239.61- MN SUBURBAN NEWS CREDIT 10- 4210 - 140 -14 5i 2 12-1 -M8.0 0444 -8/89 -4-1-8-1 4—MN-SUBURBAN-NEWS LEGAL- PUBLICATION 1.0- 421 -0- -140- _14_ - 87.23 + b4A ---- 121M81 04/-18/89- - 28 -. -83- -MN.- TORO. -INC_ - BUSHINGS- 1.0- 4540 - 560 -56- 743910 9725 - - - - -- - - - - -- nc 121M81 04/20/89 6,532.00 MN. TORO INC. NEW MOWER 27- 1340 - 000 -00 9647 121M81 04/20/89 27.61 MN. TORO INC. MOWER PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 1118 a0 12 -1M8.1 "4/20/-89 "475 -.-18 MN_TORO_INC_ IRRIGATION -PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66__ _. __ __1101 I 121M81 04/20/89 24.62 MN. TORO INC. IRR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 746641 1228 121M81 04/20/89 9.89- MN. TORO INC. CREDIT 27- 4540 - 664-66 C92691 I',' _- 1'21 H$1 04!24/ -84 140_00— -MN_- TORO.- -INC -. -- BLOWER -- -27- 4580-664 -66 1221 . - - 7,318.35 +; + ++ -CKS - - -- • 5 56 5]. 121M85 04/18/89 16.00 MN. WANNER BRAKE 10- 4248 - 560 -56 71601 I_-_ 1989 OF EDINA CHECK . STER -ITEM DESCRIPTION---- OS -01 -8% AGE 23 ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE WELDING 10- 4504 - 560 -56 71602 -LABOR TO MILL---- - - - - -1 0- 4540 - 560 -56 71533 PROF SERVICES 30- 4201 - 782 -78 71641 1257 www -CKS - CREDIT - -- -- -- - - - - -- 10 -4274- 420 -42 - SERVICE CONTRACT 10 -4288- 420 -42 8738 SERVICE CONTRACT 10- 4288- 420 -42 8738 SERVICES CONTRACT -- 10 -4288- 420 -42 8738 — — -- - - -- -- -- www -CKS 121M97 04/24/89 9,212.94 MPLS FINANCE DEPT. WATER I.9 121N07 04/20/89 250.00 MTS NW SOUND MICROPHONE 250.00 w I" w.wwwww zc, 40- 4640- 803 -80 www -CKS 10-4540- S20 -52 73569 1186 www -CKS y =- 12 -1N13 04/25/89- - 43.45- -MUZAK - --ADVERTISING-- ( CHECK -NO.--DATE- - - -- - - -- AMOUNT - - - ----- - - - - -. - - - - -- VENDOR - -- - - - -- -- `131 121M85 04/18/89 14.00 MN. WANNER 4 121 M85 - - -- 04/18/89 - - —147. 00- - - - - -- MN- WANNER - -- - i 121M85 04/18/89 21.50 MN. WANNER 86.90 w 198.50 w 9 . - - -121 M93 04/25/89- -1 ; 122.90 - - -- MOTOROLA - - -- i,c 121M93 04/25/89 7,140.00 MOTOROLA 121M93 04/25/89 6,017.00- MOTOROLA 121M93 04/25/89 6,017.00 MOTOROLA ^i 6,017.10 w -ITEM DESCRIPTION---- OS -01 -8% AGE 23 ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE WELDING 10- 4504 - 560 -56 71602 -LABOR TO MILL---- - - - - -1 0- 4540 - 560 -56 71533 PROF SERVICES 30- 4201 - 782 -78 71641 1257 www -CKS - CREDIT - -- -- -- - - - - -- 10 -4274- 420 -42 - SERVICE CONTRACT 10 -4288- 420 -42 8738 SERVICE CONTRACT 10- 4288- 420 -42 8738 SERVICES CONTRACT -- 10 -4288- 420 -42 8738 — — -- - - -- -- -- www -CKS 121M97 04/24/89 9,212.94 MPLS FINANCE DEPT. WATER I.9 121N07 04/20/89 250.00 MTS NW SOUND MICROPHONE 250.00 w I" w.wwwww zc, 40- 4640- 803 -80 www -CKS 10-4540- S20 -52 73569 1186 www -CKS y =- 12 -1N13 04/25/89- - 43.45- -MUZAK - --ADVERTISING-- SO -4214- 822 -82 508905 - -- 121N13 04/25/89 43.45 MUZAK ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 862 -86 508905 3'! �- 86.90 w - www -CKS �sJ2 '3 • -- 121N16 -04/ -18/89 - -- 7.92 -- N- .S.P -: -- COMPANY- -- POWER - - - - -- 10 -4252- 646 -64 I1 121N16 04/18/89 460.81 N.S.P. COMPANY POWER 10 -4258- 646-64 ;4" 121N16 04/18/89 26.09 N.S.P. COMPANY POWER 40-4858-801-80 ::I• 1 -21 N 1 -6 9 _P - COMPANY POWER 40-4252 - 801 =80 -- - -- �,° " ! .o -- * *ww»- - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - -- - www -CKS -- _ 121N21 04/25/89 55.95 NAPA AUTO PARTS MASTER CYC 10- 4540 - 560 -S6 502298 1138 �n2 n3 12 -1 -NE1 04.x481 -89 22 -. -$4 NAP- A --4UT0 -PARTS .ENGINE -PARTS 10-4540 - 560-56 - 484123 -9777 I• n., 121N21 04/25/89 36.59 NAPA AUTO PARTS MASTER CYC 10- 4540 - 560 -56 502833 1136 l v 121N21 04/18:89 83.77 NAPA AUTO PARTS MASTER CYC 10- 4540-560 -56 484488 9800 ns nb - - 121N21 04/- 18/89 -- 6.34 -- NAPA- AUTO -PARTS — PARTS -- 10 -4540- 560-5 6 501730 1125 - 121N21 04/25/89 16.50 NAPA AUTO PARTS KEYS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 503750 1384 `-'47 221.99 w ;..I• r 9 sol wwwwww ww• -CKS ..I •' . -- 12 -1 -N24 v4/�8/89- 370-76 NEWARK - ELECTRONICS- PARTS — 10= 4540 - 520 -52- 897208 -9964 - - - -- - - -- - I 370.76 w v57I wl � • sa� www -CKS - -'7 - 1+iu,x�e+ 21N33 04/18/89 80.00 NELSON RADIO COMM FEDERAL SIGNAL 10-4620- S60 -56 15138 1131 4 . 4p za * * *W�w - -- - - - - -- - - -- - - * * *- CKS %_9 L 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 'O- 05 -01 -89 PAGE 24 I, -- LET.TER-SE_T 1.0- 4504 - .325 -30 16908- 9879 131 121036 04/24/89 22G.31 OLSON CHAIN 6 CABLE SNAPS 10 -4504- 642 -64 87508 -- CHECK -NO —DATE AMOUNT- - - — VENDOR - - - - -- - - - - -- ITEM- DESCRIPTION -- ACCOUNT-- NO. -INV. k P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4504 - 646 -64 17210 1260 J35 80.00 6 3 * ** -CKS 3� J_ 121048 04/20/89 48.50 ORR SAFETY EQUIPMENT 5 * * « *r* 501230 8835 30 121048 04/20/89 52.45 * ** -CKS S 10- 4540- 440 -44 501228 -N48 04/24/89 2,227.18 NO -STAR -TURF- --CHEMICALS 27 -4564- 664 -66 -1 -1736- 1054- I I121 * ** -CKS - J. ` " 121N56 04/25/89 28.97 NORTHERN POWER PROD. RING GEAR 10- 4540 - 560 -56 235709 1023 28.97 "' - -- - — - - -- - - 14' * *» ** * * *- CKS I6 121N72 04/18/89 212.57 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES 10- 4616- 560 -56 121N72 04/25/89 1,176.75 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES 10- 4616- 560 -56 * ** -CKS 1 1`Z 121017 04/20/89 1,072.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPUTER SUPPLIES 10- 4233 - 560 -56 77866 9845 71 1 "23 121017 04/18/89 436.87 OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPUTER EQUIP 10 -4288- 510-51 075319 9645 j3•i J2� 1E1 -O -L7 ^41 8/89 75-x00 OF_F -I -CE- PRODUCTS SERVI- CE_FINANCE -DPPT 10-4288- 510- 51_075320 -9672 z6 121017 04/24/89 38.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS XTR CABLE PD 10- 4504 - 510-31 078725 27 „ za * * *W�w - -- - - - - -- - - -- - - * * *- CKS %_9 'O- 21.036 04/-25/89 — 6-1-- .-1.0. -- OLSON- CHAIN -d- .CABLE. -- LET.TER-SE_T 1.0- 4504 - .325 -30 16908- 9879 131 121036 04/24/89 22G.31 OLSON CHAIN 6 CABLE SNAPS 10 -4504- 642 -64 87508 1210 121036 04/25/89 12.48 OLSON CHAIN & CABLE ANCHOR 10- 4504 - 646 -64 17210 1260 J35 6 * ** -CKS 3� J_ 121048 04/20/89 48.50 ORR SAFETY EQUIPMENT SCOTT REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 440 -44 501230 8835 30 121048 04/20/89 52.45 ORR SAFETY EQUIPMENT SCOTT REPAIR PART 10- 4540- 440 -44 501228 8835 13_9 L 121P05 04/20/89 121P05 04/18/89 1,095.07 PAPER CALMENSON CUT EDGE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 379857 9357 344.28 PAPER CALMENSON CUTTING EDGE 10- 4620 - 560 -56 380116 9623 - 1-x439 -.- 35-'x- - — - - -- 121P25 04/25/89 295.00 121P25 04/25/89 4,998.00 51 -- - -5, 293 1-00 sz y53 154 �6 121P27 04/24/89 11100.00 121P27 04/24/89 21800.00 t- PEAK CONSTRUCTION PEAK CONSTRUCTION PEAT MARWICK MAIN CO PEAT MARWICK MAIN CO REPAIR H2O LINE PAMELA PK UPGRADE AUDIT AUDIT 10 -4248- 646 -64 9930 60- 1300 - 011 -20 27- 4216 - 661 -66 41100 40- 4216 - 800 -80 41100 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS ** *-CKS 1989 OF EDINA CHECK .STER 05 -01 -8t, .AGE 25 — CHECK - -NO —DATE AMOUNT— VENDOR — - -- — I- TEM— DESCRIP -T -ION ACCOUNT—NO-_- INV-.--# P.O. - -N MESSAGE-----] ll �2 ;I.. , 121P27 04/24/89 1 200 00 E T I I I �-1II 12 415.19 w I,3 '14 #* # * #w *** —CKS 115--- 121P48 04/25/89 — 135.44— — PIP -- PRINTING - -- PRINTING 30- 4600 - 781 -78 4568 -- - - -- 16 n 121P48 04/25/89 50.05 PIP PRINTING PRINTING 30- 4600 - 761 -78 4589 1245 1e 121P48 04/25/89 27.90 PIP PRINTING PRINTING 30- 4600 - 781 -78 4605 1467 19 —� 0 # # # ## 21 *** —CKS _I 22 23 121P52 04/18/89 342.00 PITNEY BOWES SERVICE CONTRACT 10 -4288- 510 -51 813547 �24 342.00 + 26� # # # # #* *** —CKS 27 — 124 -P54 04/24/ 89 - 500: -00 PLANT —&— FLANGED —EQU REDUCCERS 40-4S40- 804- 80- 62 -1-1- 9789 -- 2a i 29 500.00 w f 30 *** -CKS 31 i �32 121P77 04/25/89 77.50 PREST EQUIPMENT BROOMS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 3582 1019 33 35 # # #* #w S �. 36 *** —CK 3, 121P86 04/18/89 461.00 PROG CONSULTING ENG TESTING 40 -4248- 801 -80 1180 �38 39 461.00 w I40 — 1 41 # #* # ## *** —CKS I' 42 24-020 04414/-89 7- 9..42 U.LCK— SERV--BATTERY FILTER 10 -454 0- 56 0 -56- 3 0 0 1 9 -9723 43 121020 04/18/89 29.52 QUICK SERV BATTERY FILTER 10- 4540 - 560 -56 29971 9703 44 121020 04/18/89 41.15 QUICK SERV BATTERY FILTER 10- 4540 - 560 -56 29969 9643 45 149.79 1 46 — '1 V4' ww* # ## *** —CKS 46 1 a9 121Q22 04/20/89 127.87 QUIK PRINT SHOW FLYER 28- 4600- 701 -70 032953 1314 e 50 121022 04/20/89 27.35 QUIK PRINT CLASS FLYER 28- 4600- 701 -70 032931 1247 e 61 1x5-22 w 4 53 # # # #w# + ** —CKS �55 56 121R12 04/25/89 3.96 RADIO SHACK COUP CON 10- 4540 - 520 -52 882178 1380 5� 3.96 w 1 P A MARWICK MAIN CO A AUDIT 5 50 -4216- 820 -82 4 41100 4 - -- 1 121P27 - - -- 0 04/24/89- - - - - -- - -----11200.00- - - - - - -- PEAT - MARWICK MAIN CO - - - - -- -AUDIT - - - -- — —50- 4216- 840 -84 4 41100 - - 5 1 121P27 0 04/24/89 1 11200.00 P PEAT MARWICK MAIN CO A AUDIT 5 50 -4216- 860 -86 4 41100 7,500.00 + * +r —CKS ' 1 121P44 04/20/89 3 345.00 P PHYSIO— CONTROL M MAINT-- AGREEMENE -T 1 1 -0 -4274- 440 -44 D D15S08 1 1317---- - - 121P44 0 04/20/89 7 70.19 P PHYSIO CONTROL D DERMA JEL 1 10- 4510 - 440 -44 A A66776 9 9907 3a' �ii351 121R69 "J is ,2 444 Ca7 ail Sz 53 1 J 5 , 154� lw5, k 1EIR79 04/18/89 209.11 e09.11 04/20/89 108.60 * 206.2s ROSLAND MEETING EXP 10-4206-140-14 RTW INC. Ix_ —50m-4632--862-86 FEE FOR SERVICES 10-4260-5I0 -51 121S08 04/18/89 65.80 SAYLORS SOFTWARE 1ST SOFTWARE 10-4504-440-44 20896 12150e 04/18/89 59.35 SAYLORS SOFTWARE 1ST SOFTWARE EMS SYSTEM 10-4504-440-44 20472 2s---I-s ***—CKS ***—CKS ***—CKS ri ***—CKS 1234 7 1082 71 ***-CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05-01-89 PAGE 26 CHECK-NO—DATE —AMOUNT VENDOR— --- --ITEM- DESCRIP-TION-----ACCOUNT -NO. - INV. 0 P.O. # MESSAGE. ------- ***-CKS f, 5 1EIR21 L121R21 04/18/89 294.80 RED WING SHOES UNIFORM ALLWANCE 10-4262-301-30 3 04/LS/89 84--95—RED-WING--SHOES----UNIOFORMS __10-4262-560-56 7 12IR21 04/18/89 E33.60 RED WING SHOES UNIFORMS 10-4262-646-64 121REI 04/18/89 84.95 RED WING SHOES UNIFORMS 40-4262-801-80 9 1 —698.30-* 10, 12IR22 04/18/89 188.80 REM SUPPLIES PAINT/LUMBER 30-4544-782-78 4589 1240 tes-so 15 ***-CKS 121RE5 04/18/89 190.00 RENTAL EQUIP 3 SALES USED SAWS 10-4580-644-64 12995 9945 17 190.00 ***-CKS —124R37 04/25/89 1-90-00 RIDDLE-CONTROL-PROD---BASE— 1-0=4S,40= 330-30-890406-1-032 -- -- - -- k 190.00 *,*AUK ***-CKS-- 3' 12IR49 04/e5/89 142.30 ROAD RESCUE CAR TOP LITE/TRP 10-4504-440-44 030541 9897 �`�!__j 21 R49 04/2S/-89 -49-62—ROAD-RESCUE --AMB- PART-5 A -0- 4504 - 440 -44.- 030271 -1326 191.92 311 121R53 04/20/89 36.00 ROBERT B. HILL SALT 10-4504-440-44 89e51 1320 3 3a' �ii351 121R69 "J is ,2 444 Ca7 ail Sz 53 1 J 5 , 154� lw5, k 1EIR79 04/18/89 209.11 e09.11 04/20/89 108.60 * 206.2s ROSLAND MEETING EXP 10-4206-140-14 RTW INC. Ix_ —50m-4632--862-86 FEE FOR SERVICES 10-4260-5I0 -51 121S08 04/18/89 65.80 SAYLORS SOFTWARE 1ST SOFTWARE 10-4504-440-44 20896 12150e 04/18/89 59.35 SAYLORS SOFTWARE 1ST SOFTWARE EMS SYSTEM 10-4504-440-44 20472 2s---I-s ***—CKS ***—CKS ***—CKS ri ***—CKS 1234 7 1082 71 ***-CKS 2 .1. ,I L 1989 OF EDINA 1.. CHECK STER 05 -01 -8: iGE 27 - I- TEM- DESCR- IP -TION ACCOUNT- NO- .-INV,-- # -P.O. M MESSAGE---- - 2 �` - 12181 -i 04/25/89 1-7 -05- SCHMiDT- -MUSIC MUSIC- SUPPL -IES 10- 4596- 627- 62-- - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - -- 5 17.05 + 19 121S19 04/18/89 218.01 SEELYE PLASTICS C/Z PARTS HALIFAX 40- 4540 - 801 -80 138133 9975- _— 11 10 1 121820 04/18/89 256.00 SEIDEL - ROXANNE PRO SERVICES 30- 4201 - 781 -78 17 3 P56-r00 14 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 18 121S27 04/24/89 40.76 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 27- 4504 - 662 -66 59952 9103 j,u 121S27 04/18/89 44.56 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT & SUPPLYS 27- 4504 - 664 -66 24519 1215 — - —I 8-5-3" 120I * ** -CKS 22 121S30 04/25/89 411.00 SIGN CENTRAL GEN SUPPLYS 30-4504 - 782 -78 63844 1470 23 411.00 26 26 * * * * ** * ** -CKS � 27 121534- 04/-18/89 1 -49�99 - SOUTHDALE -FORD FINDER 10- 4540 - 560 -56- 202926--------------- - - - - -- 20 121S34 04/18/89 156.19 SOUTHDALE FORD GRILLE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 203994 29 121S34 04/18/89 31.12 SOUTHDALE FORD RELAY 10- 4540 - 560 -56 203682 30 1- 2a -S34 0AZI8 89 62-.24 SOUTHDALE-FO RD RELAY 10- 4540-560 -56- 204218 121S34 04/18/89 18.53 SOUTHDALE FORD VALVE KIT 10-4540- 560 -56 E040E1 32 121834 04/18/89 9.56 SOUTHDALE FORD RELAY 10 -4540- 560 -56 203175 33 121 -534 04/ -1 -818 °. 3. -20 SOUTHDALE -FORD CAP----- -10- 4540 - 560 -56- 204179 -- 34 121S34 04/18/89 289.28 SOUTHDALE FORD CHAMBER 10- 4540 - 560 -56 203987 35 121S34 04/18/89 149.78 SOUTHDALE FORD FLY WHEEL 10- 4540 - 560 -56 202562 36 37 869 89 +30 * * * * ** 39 * ** -CKS II1 I40 121S45 04/18/89 37.13 ST. PAUL BOOK SUPPLYS 10- 4504 - 325 -30 668752 9971 41 121S45 04/25/89 46.51 ST. PAUL BOOK SUPPLYS 10- 4504 - 540 -54 868931 1281 {I42 1- -1545 ^4/20 89 10 67 ST�AUL -BOOK OFF-LCE-SUPPLIES -LIES 2T= 4546- 66-1--66- 8689 -12 121545 04/25/89 22.91 ST. PAUL BOOK SUPPLYS 27- 4516 - 661 -66 868894 64 121S4S 04/20/89 15.78 ST. PAUL BOOK OFFICE SUPPLIES 27- 4516 - 661 -66 868930 45 ___ — 1- 2 -VS45 -041�S189 1-8 . 11 S-T . RAUL-BOOK -OFFICE-SUPPLYS- — 40-4504= -80 -1 -80- 868645 -9862 -- 46 151.11 447 48 s * * *- CKS — 49, I50 121SS4 04/18/89 114.30 STAR & TRIBUNE HELP WANTED AD 10 -4212- 510 -51 51 }e1- S54---------04/e0/89 152-40 STAR-4---TRI -BUNS ADS 10-4E42- 10-51- - -- -- 52 266.70 153 54 Ali = K 56 121S67 04/24/89 3,125.00 STORE FRONT HUMAN SERVICES 10-4201- SO4 -50 112305 57 :J4� , :J4� , 2 5 ° 9 10 ,1 ,2 I 1989 CITY OF EDINA 3,125.00 * CHECK REGISTER 05 -01 -89 PAGE 28 CRIP_ION ACCOUNT N0, - INV. -N P.O.- 11- MESSAGE -- - -_ �1 3 I{ * ** -CKS 17 8/8.9 364 -.-77 SUBURBAN - CHEVROLET BODY- - REPAIR 1- 0-4248- 560 -56- 5396 - - -- - 04�18/�°} PARTS 121577 04/20/89 1,171.45 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET BODY REPAIR 10- 4248 - 560 -56 5451 1115 1 I2a 121577 04/25/89 87.48 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR 10- 4248 - 560 -56 81154 '++ 12-1577 04/1-8/89 39:60 SUBURBAN- CHEVROLET CONTRACT- REPAIR ------40- 4248 - 560 -56 -- 79775-------------- - -13I, 121577 04/18/89 72.19 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET PARTS 10-4540 - 560-56 10510 „ 121577 04/25/89 87.75 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET HOSE ASSY 10- 4540-560-56 105782 1-21577 041-1 -8.189 1- 8-.-26 SUBURBAN— CHEVROLET PARTS 10=4540=560=56-104890 121577 04/18/89 12.28 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 105537 iel 121577 04/18/89 420.24 -- -+2094 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET LOCK CYC 10- 4540 - 560 -56 105154 I`s� 12157 04 /-18/ -19 59-1 -7— SUBURBAN— CHEVROLET LAMP —ASSY 1 -0- 4540= 560- 56--104188 — 121577 04/25/89 32.60 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET COIL 10- 4540 - 560 -56 106047 21 121577 04/25/89 32.60 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET COIL 10- 4540-560-56 106036 2,4 2n k 61.82 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP 121 S78 04/18/89 1017 21 1$1 -578 22 04�18/�°} PARTS 1 -0- 4540 - 520 -52 121578 04/18/89 16 a23 PARTS 121 S78 04/18/89 1,264.51 I2a REPAIR TO H2O HEATER 11 8489 k 61.82 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 1017 —1 -081 _E6 SUBURBAN - PLUMS -SUP PARTS 1 -0- 4540 - 520 -52 -1026 111.65 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP PARTS 10- 4540 - 540-54 1033 1,264.51 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP REPAIR TO H2O HEATER 10-4540 - 540 -54 1034 27 ` r_ 31 3: 25 --� zG 1,592.55 • '3' — *.* *-CKS—. - 2B 29 121583 04/18/89 35.78 SUPERAMERICA GENERAL SUPPLY$ 30- 4504 - 782 -78 30 31 %311 * * *+R ** 33I 1 121592 04/18/89 96.11 SYSTEM SUPPLY LASER TONER REFIL 121592 04/25/89 99.62 SYSTEM SUPPLY LASER CARTRIDGE 121T13 04/20/89 480.00 TOM HORWATH FORESTRY 480.00 * 121T40 04/25/89 1- 24 --T40 04/46/89 121T40 04/18/89 3,747.80 * 64.40 - 24, -98- 68.31 157.69 10-4504 - 510 -51 040463 1248 10-4504 - 510-51 040823 1420 10 -4201- 644 -64 TOLL COMPANY WELDINGS 10- 4610 - 560 -56 233036 1013 TOLL - COMPANY WELD- SUPPLY 10- 46 -10- 560 -56- 232604 9878 TOLL COMPANY WELDING TANKS 10- 4616- 560 -56 454633 1036 42 * ** -CKS 43 Ian 4G r 47 an * ** -CKS 51 1' 152 5] 54 ` 55 55 * ** -CKS 57 150 < 59 50 52 , ea ?!F,J_CKS�en Gil 5f1� �6] Sn :59 170 Y * ** -CKS 17 4 t 1989 OF EDINA- I CHECK NO. DATE CHECK STER 05 -01 -8. AGE 29 `.i 0 3 5 11 ill 'II e 7 c z 7� 4,339.84 I9 * * * * ** — — * ** –CKS 17 21764 04/4 -8/89 37.32 I– STATE –PLUMP RUMP – PACKING 40- 4504 -801-80- 92318 -- 441 -4 -- 37.32 ' 0 UNITED ELECTRIC 121U08 04/25/89 369.71 MISC 27- 1300 - 001 -00 140030 Iz 369.7 -1- • -- �3• j14 * * * * ** *** –CKS I16 121U20 04/18/89 28.00 UNIVERSITY OF MN SOIL TEST 30- 4660 - 782 -78 7 28.00 I�9 * * * * ** * ** –CKS 21 ^8/89 2 +U27 o 4s�1 50 -94 US– WEST --COMM . TELEPHONE- - ' -0- 4256 - 622-62 --1 22 121U27 04/18/89 26.56 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 10-4256-628-62 23 121U27 04/18/89 29.28 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 10 -4256- 646 -64 24 2 -1-U27 04/24/88 42 45 US- WEST -COMMA TELEPHONE ?- -4256- 662 -66 Z61 121027 04/24/89 157.22 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 2T- 4256 - 667 -66 121027 04/24/89 219.07 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 28- 4256 - 702 -70 27 2++27 04/24/89- ^8-75 US-WEST- GOMM.' TELEPHONE 9$- 856= X02-70 26 29 584.27 I30 {31 C p * *J��yMT- 121V30 04/25/89 189.15 VANTAGE ELECTRIC ELECTRICIANS 27 -4248- 664 -66 10632 1416 33 �32 - - - -- 35 * * * * ** 136 000-CKS 97 121V43 04/20/89 133.85 VERSATILE VEHICLE CAART PARTS 27-4540- 665 -66 .38 133.85 I39 40 * * * * ** 41 * ** –CKS a2 89 41 40 VACS e1 eCTRIC SUP LAMPS 10-49 4-646-64 a49425--la -9-0 43 44 41.40 45 * * *– CKS I46 - -� W.W. GRAINGER 47 -46 121W09 04/25/89 103.91 W. to. COETS PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 1271 i 24-W09 044/25/8 -9 =0,-66 – - FAN – CONTROL 40-4540 - 801-80 1206 49 121W09 04/25/89 143.10 MOTOR 40- 4540- 801 -80 1174 121W09 04/25/89 408.71 W.W. SeETS64 PARTS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 1206 I51 — 1-W09 04/25169 337 -44- -W.W. GGET66H- CREDIT -- 40-4S40-80-t-60 1 -206 -- 53 348.94 Isa bbb–CK 6 121W25 57 04/18/89 166.27 WASTE MGMT– SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 10 -4250- 301 -30 `.i 0 3 5 11 ill 'II e 7 c z 7� 1989 CITY OF EDINA 2 CHECK REGISTER 05 -01 -89 PAGE 30 ITEM- DESCRIP7 -ION ACCOUNT N - INV- .-- #- P.0- .- N- MESSAGE- , 3 3 121W2c -121 W2, 04/18/89 04/-18/89 v�.,� WASTE -MGMT- SAVAGE- 164. 20�. RUBBISH - REMOVAL 10- 4250 - 520 -52 - - - -- - 4 121W25 04/18/89 166.27 WASTE MGMT— SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 10- 4250 - 540 -54 e 121W25 04/18/89 27.71 WASTE MGMT— SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 23- 4250- 612 -61 +PI�c �7 ^4 /4-8 � 99.14 -WASTE-MGM-T--SAVAGE RUBBISH - REMOVAL. 27--4250- 66E =66 121W25 04/18/89 6.40 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 27-4250 - 664-66 �+ e 121W25 04/18/89 27.72 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 27- 4250 - 667 -66 9 23W25 04f18/89 166 -40 WASTE- MGMT - SAVAGE RUBBISH - REMOVAL 18-4250- 70270- 0 121W25 04/18/89 190.70 WASTE MGMT - SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 30- 4250-782 -78 121WES 04/18/89 294.40 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL 50 -4250- 841 -84 + 12 v Z$ 0441 9 -294 40 uecTR w.C-MT= VAGE RUBBISH REMOVAL SA- 4250 - 861 -8R ' 1,686.7S • 1°i I; * -CKS -- ,e 121W28 16 04/18/89 31.11 WATER PRODUCTS METER WRENCH 40- 4504 - 807 -80 088890 1183 +9 `20 +k * * * ** I21 * ** -CKS 22 121W41 04/24/89 437.25 WEST PHOTO PHOTO SUPPLIES 10-4508- 420 -42 19117 1153 [23 437.25 2� * * * * ** *** -CKS j. 126 2' -21W44 ^ ° "II' °9 °4 -r9�0 WEST- WELD-`'UP.Pl Y CO WELD- HOSSES 1 -0- 461-0- 560-56- 7-71 -37 971 -7 26 121W44 04/18/89 64.90— WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. WELD HOSSES 10-4610 - 560-56 TT13T 9717 29 121W44 04/18/89 57.37 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. HOSE ASSY 10- 4610 - 560 -56 9795 30 X46 WEST_WFi n 5��1 Y co WF1 n Ho Ps 10- 4610- 56� —G6 7 1-37 �7-1j 31 32 122.33 I33 ��..W.. _. * ** -CKS -- TT IF 35 121W66 36 04/25/89 55.00 WILLIAMS STEEL TOOLS 10 -4580- 390 -30 174278 1 7] 36 *a * * ** 39 * ** -CKS °° 121Z14 04/18/89 36.33 ZIEGLER INC HATCH ASSY 10- 4540 - 560 -56 80653 9887 I41 36.33 - - -- { I43 * * * * ** * ** -CKS '44 157,238.20 -as'• 341 •S , FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 579-33 FUND- 2'�TOTAL ART-CENTER-S65.88 46 FUND 25 TOTAL CAPITAL FUND ` f 147 288.00 FUND 26 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUND 46 FUND-27 —TOTAL -GOLF--COURSE—FUND 49 5,542.30 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND 5° 469.96 FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND If g' UND -30-TOTAL EDINBOROUGH -P -IRK -- -- - - -- J, Sz 250,636.86 FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND 9,041.77 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND L53 54 IN.13gs 00 FUND 60 T TAL CONSTRUCTION -FUN 1,372.50 FUND 66 TOTAL IMP BOND REDEMPTION M2 " 48°h1.33 9+-73- TOTAL e e e 9 0 n♦ 3 414 i, a o� 20 21 22 23 4 24I2s z6; z� 29 zv 31 �z 3 34 33 , 35 3] 36 ,