The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1989-06-05_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING JUNE 5, 1989 7:00 P.M. (Convene.Joint HRA /Council Meeting) ROLLCALL I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JOINT MEETING HRA /COUNCIL OF APRIL 17, 1989 (HRA) II. EDINBOROUGH - HAWTHORN HOTEL DEVELOPMENT (Continue indefinitely) A.. Amendment to Final Development Plan (Council) B. Amendment to Zoning Ordinance - To Allow Hotels as Principal Use in Mixed Development District (Council) C. Amendment to Redevelopment Agreement - Edinborough (HRA) D. Amendment to Sign Ordinance III. CONVEYANCE OF PHASE II CONDOMINIUMS - CENTENNIAL LAKES (HRA) IV. AWARD OF BIDS - CENTENNIAL LAKES - PHASE I DECK WATERPROOFING V. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING ASSISTANCE - RPI SERVICES - EDINA HOMESTEAD VI. RESOLUTION ADOPTING SPECIAL LAW RELATING TO EDINA TRANSYSTEM & PUBLIC BIDDING - CENTENNIAL LAKES HOUSING DEVELOPMENT (HRA) VII. ADJOURNMENT OF HRA EDINA CITY COUNCIL I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed form the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of Regular meetings of March 6 and 20, April 3 and 17, 1989 III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comments heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Set Hearing Dates .(6/19/89) 1. Final Rezoning PRD -4, Planned Residence District to PSR -4, Senior Citizen District and Final Plat Approval for RPI Services, Inc., Outlot A, Ebenezer Society lst Addition (Items B & C not subject to moratorium on subdivisions) B. Lot Division - Centennial Lakes - Phase II C. Final Plat Approval - Irwin First Addition - Lot 2, Block 1, Charles & Ilene Wright Addition - Generally located east of Valley View Road and west of Moccasin Valley Road D. Final Development Plan - SuperAmerica - 5025 Vernon Avenue (Contd from 5/15/89) IV. PUBLIC HEARING ON STREET VACATION. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution.. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Vacation of Portion of Service Road - SuperAmerica (Contd from 5/15/89) B. Waiver of Re- Payment Agenda /City of Edina June 5, 1989 - Page Two V. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS VI. AWARD OF BIDS * A. Traffic Paint Striping Truck * B. Fire Department Staff Car VII. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Art Center Expansion B. Storefront/Youth Action Report - Mary Ellen Harris C. I -494 Report D. Valley View Road /Crosstown Interchange Report E. City -Wide Recycling Program l.' Contract 2. Budget 3. Ordinances F. MNDOT Request - Noise Ordinance Variance G. Set Budget Hearing Dates H. 1989 -1990 Work Program I. Skateboarding - Council Discussion * J. Club Liquor License Renewals VIII. RESOLUTIONS - Favorable rollcall vote by majority of quorum to pass A. Resolution Adopting Special Law Relating to Edina Transit System and Public Bidding - Centennial Lakes Housing Development IX. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS A. Letter - Dona Hiltunen, 6450 York Av. S. #309 B. Letter - Alan Siegman, Advertising Chairperson, 50th & France Assoc. X. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES XI. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL XII. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS A. Fairview Southdale Hospital - Hospital Revenue .Bonds XIII. FINANCE * A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated June 5, 1989: General Fund $145,133.28, Art Center $7,659.48, Capital Fund $4,382.88, Swimming Pool Fund $2,529.96, Golf Course Fund $64,540.84, Recreation Center Fund $11,047.86, Gun Range Fund $301.42, Edinborough Park $5,545.23, Utility Fund $253,840.22, Storm Sewer Utility $2,067.00, Liquor Dispensary Fund $5,082.00, Construction Fund $16,741.70, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $600.00, Total $519,472.23, and for confirmation of payment of Claims dated 4/30/89: General Fund $125,783.81, Art Center $1,933.77, Swimming Pool Fund $89.11, Golf Course Fund $14,109.98, Recreation Center Fund $11,417.34, Gun Range Fund $156.73, Edinborough Park $11,122.86, Utility Fund $22,214.32, Liquor Dispensary Fund $224,261.04, Construction Fund $2.00, Total $411,090.96. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS June 6 -9 I.MC Annual Conference Hyatt Regency - Mpls Sat June 17 Council Study- Session 8:00 P.M. Braemar Clubhouse Mon June 19 Budget Assumptions 5:00 P.M. Mgr Conf Room Council /Planning Commission Meeting 6:00 P.M. Mgr Conf Room Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Room Mon July 10 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Room Mon July 24 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Room 350 PARE AVENUE NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022 (212)416 -9200 3 ORACHCHUHCH STREET LONDON EC3V OAT, ENGLAND 01 -929 -3334 36, RUE THONCHET 75009 PARIS, FRANCE 0I- 42- 66 -59 -49 340 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING P. 0. BOX 848 ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 66903 (607)288 -3166 510 NORTH CENTRAL LIFE TOWER 445 MINNESOTA STREET ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 66101 (612)227 -8017 D013SEY & WHITNEY A Pw ERSHIP INCLUDING PHOPH89I0- CGH -TIONH 2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 58402 (612) 340 -2600 TELEX 29 -0608 TELECOPIER (612) 340 -2868 Ms. Marcella Daehn City of Edina 4801 West 50 Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Marce: THOMAS S. ERICKSON, P. A. (612) 340 -2659 June 2, 1989 1200 FIRST INTERSTATE CENTER 401 NORTH 31 °T STREET P. 0. BOX 7188 BILLINGS, MONTANA 59108 (406)262 -3800 201 DAVIDSON BUILDING 8 THIRD STREET NORTH GREAT FALLS, MONTANA 59401 (406)727 -3632 127 EAST FRONT STREET MISSOULA, MONTANA 59802 (406)M-6025 315 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 66391 (612)475-0373 I enclose herewith the following for the Council packet for the Council meeting of June 5: 1. Resolution approving Chapter 241 of MInnesota Laws 1989 be adopted by the City Council. 2. Resolution approving Chapter 241 Minnesota Laws 1989 to be adopted by the HRA. 3. Copy of Chapter 241 Minnesota Laws 1989. 4. Ordinance No. 711 -A6 providing for collection of recyclables. 5. Ordinance No. 715 relating to mandatory separation of recyclables. 6. Ordinance No. 1001 -A4 prohibiting scavenging. 7. Ordinance No. 1301 -A4 requiring licensing of collectors of recyclables. As stated, each of these should go in the packet for the June 5 Council meeting. I believe you already have a resolution for the lot division of Phase II Condominiums Centennial Lakes and a resolution approving the conveyance for the Phase II condominium development at Centennial Lakes. r' DoRsEY & WHITNEY Ms. Marcella Daehn June 2, 1989 Page Two If you have any questions, please call me. Very truly yours, Thomas . Erickson TSE:jd enclosures cc: Mr. Gordon L. Hughes (w /enclosures) Ms. Janet Chandler (w /enclosures of ordinances) A. o e ,ss Cn •' ~�bRPOM1V19 less REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: HRA Agenda Item # HRA.III. From: GORDON L. HUGHES Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: JUNE 5, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: ❑ To Council CONVEYANCE OF PHASE II Action ❑ Motion CONDOMINIUMS - CENTENNIAL LAKES El Resolution ❑ Ordinance Discussion Recommendation: We recommend that the HRA authorize the Chairman and Secretary to execute documents conveying the Phase II,condominium lot to the condominium developer. We expect a closing of this conveyance on or about June 9, 1989, with construction to follow immediately. Info /Background: RESOLUTION RATIFYING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF VARIOUS DOCUMENTS BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), as follows: 1. Recitals. The HRA and the Edina City Council have previously approved a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.421, subdivision 15, designated as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, and have approved various amendments thereto (as so amended, the "Redevelopment Plan "). Acting pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan, the HRA has acquired certain land in the area included in the Redevelopment Plan and it has been proposed that the HRA sell and transfer a portion of such land to the East Edina Housing Foundation (the "Foundation "), pursuant to a Land Sale Agreement by and between the HRA and the Foundation (the "Agreement "). By a resolution adopted March 7, 1988, the HRA approved the form of the Agreement and authorized any two officers of the HRA to execute and deliver the Agreement on behalf of the HRA with such modifications as were deemed appropriate and approved by the Chairman and the Executive Director of the HRA. Pursuant to such authorization the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the HRA executed and delivered the Agreement dated on or as of March 14, 1988. Subsequently, by resolution dated September 12, 1988, the HRA approved execution and delivery by any two officers of the HRA, on behalf of the HRA, of an Amended and Restated Land Sale Agreement and Contract for Private Redevelopment between the HRA and Foundation with such modifications as the attorney for the HRA and Executive Director of the HRA should approve (the "Amended Agreement "). Pursuant to such authorization the Chairman and Secretary of the HRA executed and delivered the Amended Agreement dated on or as of September 30, 1988. In connection with the transactions contemplated by the Amended Agreement, it is now proposed that Phase II of the Condominium Development be commenced on the property described on Exhibit A hereto.(the "Phase II Condominium Property ") and that the Phase II Condominium Property be conveyed pursuant to the Amended Agreement and on the same terms and conditions as the Phase I Condominium Property was conveyed with such changes and modifications as may be approved by the Executive Director and the Attorney to the HRA. 2. Authorization for Execution and Delivery of Documents. Any two officers of the HRA are authorized and directed to execute such instruments and agreements as may be required or be desirable to accomplish the conveyance of the Phase II Condominium Property pursuant to the Amended Agreement with such changes and modifications as may be approved by the Executive Director and Attorney for the HRA. The execution of such instruments and agreements by any two officers of the HRA shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents by the HRA in accordance with this Resolution. EXHIBIT A THE HOMES AT CENTENNIAL LAKES PHASE II CONDOMINIUM LAND DESCRIPTION All that part of LOT 1, BLOCK 2, SOUTH EDINA DEVELOPMENT ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of said LOT 1; thence on an assumed bearing of North 00 degrees 14 minutes 09 seconds West, along the easterly line of said LOT 1 for 100.00 feet; thence North 18 degrees 11 minutes 57 seconds East, along said easterly line for 47.23 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence South 89 degrees 45 minutes 51 seconds West for 148.64 feet; thence North 45 degrees 14 minutes 09 seconds West for 35.67 feet; thence North 00 degrees 14 minutes 09 seconds West for 187.78 feet; thence North 89 degrees 45 minutes 51 seconds East for 25.93 feet; thence North 00 degrees 14 minutes 09 seconds West for 77.00 feet; thence North 89 degrees 45 minutes 51 seconds East for 153.00 feet to said easterly line of LOT 1; thence South 00 degrees 14 minutes 09 seconds East, along said easterly line for 274.80 feet; thence South 18 degrees 11 minutes 57 seconds West, along said easterly line for 16.02 feet to the point of beginning. Dated as of the 5th day of June, 1989. Attest: Executive Director Chairman RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land: All of Lot 1, Block 2, SOUTH EDINA DEVELOPMENT ADDITION, except that part described as follows: Phase I - Centennial Lakes Beginning at the southeast corner of said Lot 1; thence on a assumed bearing -of North 00 degrees 14 minutes 09 seconds West, along the easterly line of said Lot 1 for 100.00 feet; thence North 18 degrees 11 minutes 57 seconds East, along said easterly line for 47.23 feet; thence South 89 degrees 45 minutes 51 seconds West for 148.64 feet; thence North 45 degrees 14 minutes 09 seconds West for 35.67 feet; thence North 00 degrees 14 minutes 09 seconds West for 37.79 feet; thence South 89 degrees 45 minutes 51 seconds West for 143.93 feet to the westerly line of said Lot 1; thence South 00 degrees 14 minutes 09 seconds East, along said westerly line for 146.64 feet; thence South 35 degrees 08 minutes 34 seconds East for 154.42 feet to the southerly line of said Lot 1; thence North 56 degrees 15 minutes 46 seconds East, along said southerly line for 5.00 feet; thence easterly for 222.69 feet along said southerly line on a tangential curve concave to the south, radius 377.50 feet and central angle 33 degrees 47 minutes 55 seconds, to the point of beginning; and WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows: All that part of Lot 1, Block 2, SOUTH EDINA DEVELOPMENT ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: -Phase II -- Centennial Lakes Commencing at the southeast corner of said LOT 1; thence on an assumed bearing of North 00 degrees 14 minutes 09 seconds West, along the easterly line of said LOT 1 for 100.00 feet; thence North 18 degrees 11 minutes 57 seconds East, along said easterly line for 47.23 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence South 89 degrees,45 minutes 51 seconds West for 148.64 feet; thence North 45 degrees 14 minutes 09 seconds West for 35.67 feet; thence North 00 degrees 14 minutes 09 seconds West for 187.78 feet; thence North 89 degrees 45 minutes 51 seconds East for 25.93 feet; thence North 00 degrees 14 minutes 09 seconds West for 77.00 feet; thence North 89 degrees 45 minutes 51 seconds East for 153.00 feet to said easterly line of LOT 1; thence South 00 degrees 14 minutes 09 seconds East, along said easterly line for 274.80 feet; thence South 18 degrees 11 minutes 57 seconds West, along said easterly -line for 16.02 feet to the point of beginning, and All of Lot 1, Block 2, SOUTH EDINA DEVELOPMENT ADDITION, except those parts described above as Phase I and Phase II. WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of,Edina Ordinance Nos. 801 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. ti;aa. Arm o REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: HRA FROM: GORDON L. HUGHES VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000 DATE: JUNE 5, 1989 AGENDA ITEM HRA IV ITEM DESCRIPTION: Centennial Lakes - Phase I Deck Waterproofing Company Amount of Quote or Bid Nichols & Hines, Inc. $ 5,183 2. Kremer -Davis 2. 6,440 3. Waterproofing, Inc. 3. 6,817 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Nichols & Hines, Inc. GENERAL INFORMATION: The proposed project is the deck waterproofing for the Phase I Centennial Lakes building. This work is part of the public , improvements undertaken by the HRA that benefit the condominiums. Signature The Recommended bid is 1/ — within budget not Kenneth HRA Department Wallin, City Man c 1 Director ch • ,N�bRPOMStiO • BBB , REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: HRA From: GORDON L. HUGHES ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER Date: JUNE 5, ]989 Subject: REQUEST FOR TAX INCREME FINANCING ASSISTANCE AND TAX EXEMPT BOND ISSUANCE - RPI SERVICES Recommendation: Agenda Item # xRA•v. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends 0 To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Authorize preparation of redevelopment agreement on following terms. Conduct required hearings concerning tax exempt bond issuance. Info /Background: On April 3, 1989, the HRA-considered the preliminary request of RPI Services for tax exempt bonds and tax increment financing assistance for a proposed project in the northwest quadrant of Parklawn Avenue and York Avenue. The proposed project is.an 80 dwelling unit development designed for frail elderly. The project is designed to fill the gap between traditional senior housing and a rest home. Based upon Council direction on April 3, 1989, staff has met with the developers of the project to outline the terms of a proposed agreement concerning bond issuance and tax increment financing. The developers are requesting issuance of tax exempt bonds for the project. These bonds would be similar to the housing revenue bonds which the City issued for Edina Park Plaza and Vernon Terrace. Pending federal legislation would require 20% of the proposed units to be available at rents affordable to low and moderate income individuals. Even though this legislation is pending, if passed it will impose the 20% requirement on the project. This requirement is similar to that imposed at Edina Park Plaza and Vernon Terrace. In HRA Report /Recommendation June 5, 1989 Page Two The proposed tax exempt bond issue is proposed to be an un -rated issue which would be privately placed to institutional investors. Under this arrangement, individual local investors may not be affected by a default on such bonds. The proposed tax increment financing assistance for the project would be similar to that extended to the Edina Park Plaza. By way of the proposed agreement the HRA would agree to make an annual loan to the project of $70,000. The annual loans would commence in 1991 and would continue for 20 years thereafter. Each annual loan would be conditioned upon the following: 1. The tax increment generated from the development would have to be at least $70,000 annually. If less than $70,000. the annual loan would be for the actual tax increment generated. 2. The annual loan would be made upon receipt of evidence that the current year's real estate taxes had been paid. 3. Federal law would have to require the 20% of the units would be available to low an moderate income residents. If the annual payments extend for the full -term of 20 years, the project then must repay all annual loans to the HRA with interest over the subsequent 20 years. If, however, the project is sold to an unrelated entity, converted to a condominium or other type of housing, or refinanced, the annual loan payments by the HRA would terminate and all prior payments made would have to be repaid immediately, but without interest. The repayment of the annual loans by the HRA would be secured by a second mortgage. In connection with the proposed development, the developers are prepared to make a dedication to the City of $40,000. The developers would also pay all legal fees incurred by the HRA in connection with the project. The proposed tax increment financing assistance for this project results in an essentially risk -free position for the HRA. Under the proposed agreement, the HRA would make annual loan advances only if the taxes are paid by the development and only in an amount which does not exceed the tax increment generated from the payment of such taxes. Increments from other projects in the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan Area would not be required to assist the proposed development. If the HRA wishes to assist this project, we believe that the terms outlined above represent fair and reasonable contribution on the part of the City and HRA. This assistance package is similar to that which has been provided the Edina Park Plaza. In light of recent defaults of housing revenue bonds in the City, the HRA may wish to discuss with the developers the credit - worthiness of the proposed tax exempt bond issue. i MAY 31 '89 10 :10 HOLMES ° GRAVEN P. PtibtiCORP IrvC. 41.0. PiRsbuRy CENTER (612) 337.9292 MiNNEA' , is, MN 55402 M E M O R A N D U M To.': Larry Olson RPI Services j Fr©mz S.i.d'Inman Publicorp,..Inc. RE.: Frail Elderly Project Date: May 30,. .1989 P p" g suggested that it might be At our Last meeting,, it was su h.el ful to compare and contrast the tax increment methods used on other senior projects in the city.Edina, with our particular project. The purposes would be to determine . whether or not previously applied tax increment techniques were appropriate for the project. I have identified a number of areas which I feel have the financial impact on our project in comparison to previously completed projects. .1'.' Method of Tax Increment Deliver The method we are requesting for delivery of tax increment to the.project is "Pay- As--You -Go ", and not interest rate reduction. "Pay -As- You -Go" is distinguished from interest rate reduction in that it is a subsidy that is aimed directly at the individual renters and designed specifically to reduce their rent. Interest rate reduction, on the other hand, is designed to reduce the cost of financing to the project, and less directly affects the renters 2. City *s Risk. Under interest rate reduction., the city,has to guarantee that it will make the interest rate reduction payment to the bank. This is'necessary in order to convince the bank to provide the funding. In the event that the developer fails to pay real estate taxes, the city will still be required -to pay the interest reduction portion . through tax increment. While the city may eventually recoup its payment through either letter of credit security or a subsequence sale of the project, the city is at risk during the period of time of litigation and /or sale of the project. Under our proposed "Pay -As- You -Go" method, there is no guarantee that the city has to make the regarding "Pay -As- You -Go" payment. The payment is totally non- recoursed to the city and is only made in the event that the developer complies with the elements of the development agreement including a yearly paying of taxes. -I- MAY 31 '39 10 :11 HOLMES & GRAVEN P.3 3. Income Tax Treatment. Most of the projects in Edina were completed prior to the change in the income tax law. This has a substantial affect on the method of which real estate property is evaluated. prior to the change in the tax law, developers evaluated the potential success on their individual projects based on how it affected their final income. Such items as passive losses, accelerated depreciation, and favorable capital gains treatment, allowed developers to proceed with projects that infact, were uneconomical by today's standards. Since our project is being developed under a new law, the incomes stream must show positive from the very beginning. Therefore, our initial analysis of the success of the project, is far different than those completed prior to the changes in the tax law. 4. Success/Failure. in evaluating the past practices the developer has used regarding tax increment financing, one must determine whether or not the project has been successful. Just because a particular developer accepted a certain practice or procedure regarding tax increment financing, does not necessarily assume that that practice or procedure added to a successful project. The number.of projects within the metropolitan area including many senior projects have developed cash -flow problems, some of which can be specifically traced to the tax increment process that was applied. Therefore, in determining whether a practice or procedure is correct, one must first determine whether the project has been successful. One of the additional considerations that you asked me to analyze, was the potential affect on the project if in fact the tax increment assistance that was given to the development had to be paid back upon a subsequent sale or after nineteen and a half (19 1/2) years of receiving the payment. In order for this to make sense economically to the development, one of two occurences must happen. Either at the time of the sale of the project the .market value must have increased to the point where it not only pays off the first underlying debt on the project, but additionally increases to the point to pay off the obligation to city. The second occurences that beginning of the project to the increase substantially enough to to the city. -2- over the period from the end of the project, the rents begin to pay back the debt MAY 31 '89 10:.11 HOLMES & GRAVEN P.4 I have attempted to numerically analyze those occurences on the attached sheet and present them to you for your review. The first column is an attempt to simulate the "Pay - As- You -Go" payments to the developer. It is set at $71,000.00 at the request of the city. The second and third columns indicate the interest accrual on that amount, with a balance due.to the city. Using this scenario, the total cummulative debt to the city at the end of the twenty -two" (22) year period, would be a little over $3,200,000.00. The next column indicates the balance due to the city with no interest. You will note that the difference of approximately $2,000,000 indicates a 231% difference. In evaluating the tax increment district, it is our opinion that while the But-For analysis is very important, it is equally important for all parties to 'determine whether or not the method of applying the tax increment will lead to a successful. project. Therefore, I think the first four (4) items that I discussed are very important to include in the analysis of how the tax increment is applied. Furthermore, if the parties decide to include a pay back provision, I think it is particularly important that they make a determination as to whether it is reasonable to believe that the development will have the ability to make the pay back provisions included.,. As you can see, a payback provision with interest would only increase the total amount due to the city substantially and potentially place a heavy burden on the occupants who's rent would be required to make the payments. I hope this analysis provides some inside into the questions you asked. Please let me know what other additional-information I can provide. SCI /jp cc: Gordon Hughes, City of Edina -3- Mayor Richards asked if the merchants have discussed what might be fair and r. equitable as to special assessment for the proposed project. Mr. Brown said that they probably could live with a special assessment of 20% as before. The Commissioners then discussed various issues of the proposed project including the impact of the existing tax increments districts on the general fund, whether funds could be transferred between districts, importance of keeping the area attractive, savings in maintenance costs for the area if renovation and upgrading is done, need for additional parking on the north side in the future, percentage of project cost that could be specially assessed, and priorities for various elements of the proposed project. Commissioner Smith made a motion directing staff to schedule a public hearing on May 15, 1989 for the proposed 1989 50th and France project, to obtain cost estimates for the project and to present a funding proposal for the project based on 20% of costs being assessed to benefitted property with the remaining 80% financed through tax increments. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. / _REQUEST OF R.P.I. SERVICES FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING ASSISTANCE CONSIDERED• STAFF DIRECTED TO CONTINUE WORKING WITH DEVELOPERS ON CONCEPT. Assistant Director Hughes recalled that the Council granted preliminary rezoning approval to Planned Senior Residence PSR -4 on September 19, 1988 for property located in the northwest quadrant of Parklawn Avenue and York Avenue. The proposed project involved a development for 72 dwelling units designed for fail elderly that would provide a level of service above traditional senior housing, but less than a nursing home would provide. The proposed development would be located on land presently owned by 7500 York. Development of the property would be accomplished by way of a land swap between 7500 York and Hedbergs. The land exchange has been pursued for several years and has been encouraged by staff. The original proponents of the project, R.P.I. Services, Inc., have entered into an agreement with the Craig C. Avery Company to develop the project. When completed, it is proposed to be conveyed to Ebenezer Society and Lutheran General Health Care Systems who will own and manage the building. Director Hughes advised that the proponents have recently approached staff and requested tax increment financing assistance as well as the potential use of housing revenue bonds. The request was formally made in a letter dated March 30, 1989 from R.P.I. Services, Inc. Regarding the tax increment financing assistance, the proponents have suggested a pay -as- you -go concept. Under this proposal, the HRA would agree to contribute each year an amount comprising all or part of the tax increment generated from the project in that year. This contribution would be conditioned upon payment by the project of its annual real estate taxes. The tax increment contribution presumably would be used to reduce interest costs, thereby making the project feasible. Under this arrangement, the HRA would not have to sell bonds or incur capital expenditures for the acquisition of the land or other improvements. Rather, the HRA would pay tax increment only if real estate taxes are paid. Therefore, the HRA would not be at risk as may be the case if bonds were issued. The HRA could structure the annual contribution as an unrecoverable grant to the project or it could be structured as a loan, which could be repaid following termination of the tax increment district. The proposed project is located in the original Southeast Edina Tax Increment Financing District established in 1977. Based upon staff's understanding of the present law, tax increment contributions could be extended to the project until the year 2009. No tax increment payments could be made following that date. He noted also that tax increments from this property have not been relied upon for the Centennial Lakes project or for Edinborough. As to housing revenue bonds, staff presently is unclear as to the eligibility of this project for tax exempt bonds. Such bonds were issued for the Edina Park Plaza and the Vernon Terrace projects. If such bonds were issued, they are backed only by revenues of the project itself, not by the general obligations of the City. Use of housing revenue bonds typically requires that a certain percentage of the units are available to low and moderate income residents. Director Hughes concluded his presentation with the comment that if the HRA wishes to consider public assistance for this project, it should direct staff to prepare a.draft development agreement for HRA review. Such an agreement could be considered in connection with final development plan review by the City Council at a future meeting. Larry Olson, R.P.I. Services, Inc., advised that since the Council granted preliminary rezoning and plat approval for Elder Homestead, they have been busy continuing the plans, developing costs, conducting in -depth market analysis and assembling the final development ownership team. He said that Ebenezer brings expertise in management of seniors' project and an excellent reputation in the market place. Craig C. Avery Company has joined R.P.I. Services to provide a wide range of real estate experience and to assure that a timely, cost effective and state of the art facility is built. The Elder Homestead Corporation, represented by Bob Peterson, has been involved with cutting edge research and operating experience in assisted living. Mr. Olson said that the project is geared to the 1990's needs of the frail elderly, a rapidly expanding part of the seniors' market. It has been designed to fit the needs of Edina, it is residential in nature and offers a wide range of affordability through setting aside 20% of the units for the low and moderate income senior. He introduced Bob Peterson, Mark Thomas and Sid Inman saying they would differentiate their project and the market that it meets from the traditional seniors' projects and nursing homes. Bob Peterson said he wanted to focus the Council on who we are really talking about as the frail elderly. Nationally, assisted living is probably one of the fastest breaking kinds of service program. The frail elderly refers to people 85, 90 and 95 years of age. As a culture we have not as yet experienced any large number of these people who are still living in the community and participating. The intent of a program like Elder Homestead is to provide an environment which adapts to those people's needs versus requiring them to change their life style to adapt to an environment such as a nursing home which can be very stressful for them. Elder Homestead is planned to provide a dignified residential setting for fragile old people who do not need nursing homes or hospitals. What they need is someone around 24 hours a day to be sure they are okay, to be sure they get their meds, and to be sure they get three meals. If they need nursing care, that is brought by a qualified home health agency. Mr. Peterson stated that these kinds of programs work beautifully when tied into a continuum of care such as offered by Ebenezer. The proposed facility completes that continuum so that the people at 7500 York or The Durham, etc. where there are large concentrations of elderly, well into their eighties, have a place to get service and to live and contribute without having to leave their community. Mark Thomas, President of Ebenezer Society, said he would briefly go over their history, how they look at this project and their interest in it. The Ebenezer Society is an affiliate of Lutheran General Health Care Systems out of Chicago. Both Ebenezer and Lutheran General are social ministry organizations under the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America. The Society was established in 1917 and has been providing services to the older adult population in the metro area since that time. He noted that currently, the Ebenezer Society operates and owns four health care centers providing services to approximately 800 beds; three adult day care centers providing services to 100 residents per day; eight housing projects that they either own or manage, including 7500 York in Edina. Their community services division provides services to over 2,000 clients in the metro area. Their transportation division has a fleet of 25 vehicles and is. a Metro Mobility provider to over 3,000 clients. He explained that they are also in joint venture with Group Health and have developed a social HMO which has a membership of over 3,500 people. Mr. Thomas said that their interest in this project looks specifically at the continuum of care concept. Part of their mission is to provide services at all ranges in the health care system, starting with independent housing supported by community services to help frail individuals stay there as long as they desire, going into board /care services up to skilled nursing facilities and including specialized nursing care. He said that the assisted care concept is an alternative that is receiving a lot of interest these days and is an area that needs to be looked at very carefully. Also, the elderly themselves are expressing a great interest in this alternative. Experience in the industry is a major reason for Ebenezer's participation in the project together with its location adjacent to the 7500 York Avenue development that they currently manage. He concluded with the comment that their interest is a strong one and that they feel there definitely is a market for this type of project. Sid Inman, Publicorp, said they were advising the developer regarding financing on the project. R.P.I. Service's letter had addressed some of the problems this project has as a real estate development, e.g. interest rate increase, increased land holding costs which are typical real estate financing considerations. He said that they do have a unique feature in the project which is why they are addressing the need for tax increment financing. Due to the -type of product they are required to provide 20% of the units for the low and moderate income, hopefully, mostly Edina residents. Mr. Inman said that what this basically means is that, if you compare it to a real estate development where you are leasing space or renting office space, they are required up front to discount 20% of their service so that they automatically have a negative shortfall going into the project. Because the project is unique they have recommended a unique type of tax increment application referred to as pay -as- you -go. Rather than asking the City to take any risk up front, the building will actually be up and possibly occupied before the City will have any financial commitment to make. He said it was an advantage from their perspective because that money can then be used to directly benefit the individual tenants in the building. On a year to year basis the money will be used directly for what it is intended to do and that is attack those 20% of low and moderate income. Mr. Inman added that the City think about the idea of Tax Exempt Housing Bonds. The same technique applies here, with the high interest rates and the already negative economic feature of the 20% low and moderate income units; they have to develop financing that is below market rate so that the project will work. He mentioned that the trend now in Washington is to go back to these types of requirements for housing. He asked that the Council consider directing staff to discuss the application of these two types of financing tools with them. Commissioner Smith commented that typically with tax increment proposals there is some benefit directly to the City and that he had not heard that. Mr. Peterson said that the payoff is really to the seniors in the community who will have this kind of resource available to them, that it is part of the quality of life, just as are streets, shopping malls, theatres, etc. Commissioner Kelly asked about the range of rent costs for residents and if priority could be be given to Edina citizens. As to housing revenue bonds, she said she was concerned that even though the City was not at risk, if they are floated under the name of the City of Edina, that people will assume that the City is putting its full faith and credit behind the bonds. She said that the City should be careful.in using that tool in a projLtct unless the City is assured that it will be a successful project. Mr. Peterson said that, based on their experience with the Minnetonka project, the market rate rents are estimated to be between $1200 to $1400. This would fall well within the national average for assisted living. Tax increment financing would allow them to reduce the rates for the 20 %.units designated for low and moderate income. Chairman Richards asked for clarification that the proposal is for a dollar amount for a period of time. He asked what would happen after the negotiated term ends. Mr. Peterson explained that the pay -as- you -go concept as it has been applied in housing is to try to structure the assistance with an end date. The point is to try to get the revenues over that continuum to graduate to the point that the expenses are also under control so that assistance is no longer needed. It can be structured in many different ways, one way is to put a bond up front and reduce the cost. Mr. Peterson said that the pay -as- you -go method really addresses the costs for the 20% of units for low and moderate income. They will be able to measure and demonstrate in subsequent hearings what the money is being used for. Mr. Peterson addressed the question of how this would service Edina residents. He said that the pattern is quite standard nationally that the draw for a project like this will be within a 3 -5 mile radius or it will involve elderly persons who are coming into the area because their children live in the neighborhood. The importance of putting facilities in communities is to allow the elderly to be able to stay in their own communities or be near their families. Chairman Richards asked if guidelines could be drafted by the City that would be adopted in exchange for public assistance whereby the issue of preference for Edina residents could be addressed. Mr. Inman said that under the tax increment law you can pretty much structure anything you want under this method. The only restrictions would be those imposed by state law and the federal income tax law. He commented that they are highly aware of the sensitivity of the bonds and that they are also considering some other vehicles for placement, such as a private institution. Commissioner Paulus commented that when this proposal was first introduced there was no request for public assistance from the City. She asked why this was not figured in when the project was first proposed. Mr. Olson responded that the market research done since then has indicated a need to offer the assisted living to a wider range of income and secondly, there has been some federal legislation introduced which is impacting the 20% requirement. Commissioner Paulus asked if they have the 20% requirement units available in their existing facilities. Mr. Olson said that in their Minnetonka project there is not the 20% set aside, but that he believed that going forward that would be a characteristic of all their projects. Commissioner Paulus said she felt that the concept was excellent, but that she was concerned with recent demographics for Edina that most of the elderly that would apply for the assisted living housing would fall into the 20% low and moderate income category. Another concern was that it seems like-all the developments in southeast Edina are being financed through tax increment financing and that the citizens will question the City's heavy involvement. Chairman Richards said the issue is do we want the staff to explore further the request to utilize tax increment financing for the project. Commissioner Smith made a motion that the City not proceed with any discussions on tax increment financing or any other type of public assistance for the proposed Elder Homestead project. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Paulus. Commissioner Kelly said she understood the concerns of Members Paulus and Smith. She pointed out that we have made commitments to provide housing for the younger age citizens in the same area of the City and that we should make the same sort of commitment to our older citizens. She agreed that the low income level is with our elderly and that Edina has the highest amount of seniors per capita in Hennepin County. Commissioner'Kelly said she was concerned about the rental amount for the project in that it would be too costly for our elderly citizens. She added that she would like to see the staff continue discussing this with the developers and bring back information as to how it would impact our general fund. She noted that the project land trade with the Centennial Lakes project also gave her incentive to support public financing assistance. Chairman Richards then called the motion on the floor. Ayes: Paulus, Smith Nays: Kelly, Rice, Richards Motion failed. Following further discussion, Commissioner Kelly then made a motion to direct staff to work with the development group for Elder Homestead on the concept of public financing and to bring back a recommendation for Council consideration. Motion was seconded by Chairman Richards. .Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards Nays: Smith Motion carried. RESOLUTION ADOPTED REGARDING EXEMPTION FROM REAL ESTATE TAXES FOR BLOOMINGTON PARCEL - CENTENNIAL LAKES Executive Director Hughes advised that a small portion of the Centennial Lakes property is located within the City of Bloomington and that this parcel is proposed to be developed for hotel uses at a future date. As with the Edina property, the Bloomington parcel is owned via contract for deed by the Edina HRA. Therefore, this property may be eligible for real estate tax exemption until it is resold to the developers. The redevelopment contract for Centennial Lakes requires that the HRA cooperate in obtaining this exemption. Director Hughes explained that staff has administratively applied for the exemption with the City of Bloomington. Bloomington has declined to exempt the property because they believe it is not eligible for exemption. The developers of the project have asked that the request for exemption should be re -filed with Bloomington and the County and should be supported by a resolution of the HRA certifying that the subject property is being held by the HRA for later resale for economic development purposes. He added that if the exemption is ultimately denied, the developers are responsible for the payment of the taxes. Commissioner Rice introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION AREAS, by contract for deed dated October 3, 1988 and filed October 14, 1988 with the Hennepin County Recorder as Document No. 5465055 and with the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles as Document No. 1966600, the HRA purchased certain real property in Hennepin. County, Minnesota including, among other parcels, the-parcel of real property legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and having a Property Identification No. of 05- 027 -24 -22 -0002 (the "Subject Property "); WHEREAS, the Subject Property is being held by the HRA for later resale for economic development purposes; NOR, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the certification to the Hennepin County Assessor and City of Bloomington dated March 13, 1989 executed by Gordon L. l Hughes, as Executive Director of the HRA that the Subject Property is being held by the HRA for later resale for economic development purposes be, and it hereby is, ratified in all respects and said certification shall, and hereby does, constitute the certification of the Board of Directors of the HRA. w �.9ZriA' En �1 •'�'�RPOA!'S�V • lase REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item # xRA.VI. From: GORDON L. HUGHES Consent ❑ ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER Information Only ❑ Date: JUNE 5, 1$89 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: " . � To Council CHAPTER 241 LAWS OF MINNESOTA - 1989 Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Info /Background: Staff is pleased to report that Governor Perpich signed Chapter 241 into Law on May 25, 1989. This Law permits the City of Edina to operate a public transit systein in southeast Edina and establish a special service district to provide funding for the operation of that system. This law also provides the City of Edina, and its Housing and Redevelopment Authority need not require public bidding and performance bonds in connection with public improvements benefitting housing projects within the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan area. As you know, this legislation was sponsored at our request by Senator Storm and Representative Forsythe. In order to become effective, the City Council and the Housing and Redevelop- ment Authority must adopt the attached Resolution which authorizes acceptance of Chapter 241. Staff recommends acceptance of these Resolutions. Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING CHAPTER 241, MINNESOTA LAWS, 1989 The Housing And Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota hereby approves Chapter 241, Minnesota Laws, 1989, as required by such law and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 645.021, Subd. 2, and the Executive Director is directed to file with the Secretary of State a certificate of approval as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 645.021; Subd. 3. Attest: Dated this day of June, 1989. Chairman ecretary The Motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted and was signed by the Chairman and his signature attested by the Secretary. _ AN ACT Distributed By Secretary of the SENATE Rolom 231, State Capitol St. Paul, 296 -2343 1 CHAPTER No. 241 S.F. No. 54 2 relating to the.city of Edina; authorizing the city to 3 operate a public transit system and to acquire 4 necessary equipment, land, and interests in land; 5 permitting the establishment of special service 6 districts in the city; providing that the city and the 7 housing and redevelopment authority need not require 8 competitive bidding and bonds in connection with 9 certain redevelopment projects. 10 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: 11 Section 1. (PUBLIC TRANSIT SYSTEM.] 12 The city of Edina may acquire, construct, maintain, and 13 .operate a public transit system not operating on fixed rails in 14 the area of the city bounded by-county state aid road number 62 15 on the north, trunk highway 100 on the west, and the city limits 16 on the south and east. The city may acquire, by purchase, 17 lease, or other means, all equipment or other personal property 18 necessary or convenient to operate the system. The city may 19 acquire by purchase, lease, gift, devise, condemnation, or 20 otherwise all land and right -of -way or other interests in land 21 necessary or convenient to construct or operate the system. The 22 city may enter into contracts necessary or proper to acquire, 23 construct, maintain, or operate the system. The city shall have 24 all powers necessary or convenient to acquire, construct, 25 maintain, or operate the system. The city may, in lieu of 26 directly operating the system or any part of it, contract with a 27 person to manage or operate it on behalf of the city. The 1 CHAPTER No. 241 S.F. No. 54 1 operation of the public transit system by the city shall not be 2 subject to regulation by the transportation regulation board 3 under Minnesota Statutes, chapter 221 4 Sec. 2. (SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT.] 5 For the purposes of this section "special services" means 6 all services rendered or contracted for by the city, includina, 7 but not limited to: 8 (1) acquisition, construction, maintenance, and operation 9 of the public transit system authorized by section 1• and 10 (2) any other service provided to the public by the city 11 authorized by any law. 12 The governing body of, the city of Edina may establish one 13 special service district in the city by ordinance• a second 14 special service district may be established by ordinance only if 15 the second district is established and operated jointly with 16 another city. The provisions of Minnesota Statutes, chapter 17 428A, shall govern the establishment and operation of special 18 service districts in the city, except that if any special 19 service district includes the property of Fairview Southdale 20 Hospital in the city, then service charges, including service 21 charges based on net tax capacity, may be imposed under chapter 22 428A against the property and improvements of Fairview Southdale 23 Hospital as well as other property in the district 24 Sec. 3. (EXCEPTION FROM COMPETITIVE BIDDING AND 25 PERFORMANCE BONDS.) 26 The city of Edina and its housing and redevelopment 27 authority need not require either competitive bidding or 28 performance bonds with respect to any facilities or other 29 improvements to be owned by or subject to easements in favor of 30 the city or authority which are constructed in connection with 31 residential developments constructed in conjunction with 32 redevelopment projects, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, 33 section 469.002, subdivision 14, to be undertaken in the 34 southeast Edina redevelopment plan area of the authority. 35 Sec.. 4. (EFFECTIVE DATE.) 36 Sections 1 and 2 are effective the day after comDliance 2 . 1 with Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021, 2 governing body of the city of Edina. 3 Section 3 is effective the day after 4 Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021, subd 5 governing bodies of the city of Edina and 6 redevelopment authority of Edina. 3 CHAPTER No. 241 S.F. No. 54 subdivision 3, by the comoliance with !vision 3, by the the housing and 0 i . „ ,. CHAPTER No. 241 S.F. No. 54 This enactment of the Senate and House of Representatives is properly,enrolled. Jero a 13. Hughes ' Ptn nt of the Senate. Passed the Senate on May 11e 1989. Passed the House of Representatives on May 17, 1989. Q J-- b /n , �'- � Robert Vanasek Speaker of the douse of Representadues. Patrick E. Flanaven Seeman of the Senate. ' Edward A. Burdick Chief Clerk, House of Representatives. Presented to the Governor on ?1989. Steven C. Cross Revisor of Statutes. Approved on 1989, at Rudolph VVrpich Governor of the State innesota. Filed on 1989. &' /'I' I " f Joan Anderson Growe Seerewy of State. 4 RESOLUTION APPROVING CHAPTER 241, MINNESOTA LAWS, 1989 The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota hereby approves Chapter 241, Minnesota Laws, 1989, as required by such law and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 645.021, Subd. 2, and the Executive Director is directed to file with the Secretary of State a certificate of approval as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 645.021, Subd. 3. Dated this 5th day of June, 1989. ATTEST: Secretary Chairman y .~ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MARCH 6, 1989 The meeting was called to order by Mayor Richards at 7:00 p.m. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Richards. CITY RECEIVES M.R.P.A. AWARD FOR EDINBOROUGH PARK Bruce Anderson, representing the Minnesota Recreation and Park Association (MRPA), explained that in 1987 the MPRA established the citation awards program. Its intent was to recognize projects that exemplified excellence in recreation, parks and leisure services throughout the State of Minnesota. Six projects were chosen in the state in 1988 and were formally recognized by the MRPA at their fall conference. Mr. Anderson presented the MRPA Award to the City of Edina for its Edinborough Park project. He congratulated the City Council, staff and residents for an outstanding project. Mayor Richards introduced Bill Bach, Edinborough Park Manager, and commended him for the excellent job he has been doing in directing the Edinborough Park activities and in maintaining it for the people in the community. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OF_REGULAR MEETINGS OF OCTOBER 3 AND 17, NOVEMBER 7. 1988 APPROVED Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith to approve the minutes of the regular meetings of October 3, 17 and November 7, 1988. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. Mayor Richards asked Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly to assume the chair and excused himself from the meeting during consideration of the preliminary plat - Edina Highlands 2nd Addition.) PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR EDINA HIGHLANDS 2ND ADDITION DENIED Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Craig Larsen presented the request for preliminary plat approval for Edina Highlands 2nd Addition (Lot 6, Block 1, Edina Highlands). He explained that this subdivision was submitted in November of 1988. The proposal was not heard by the Council prior to the adoption of the ordinance imposing a moratorium on platting, replatting and subdivision of lots within the R -1 District. Planner Larsen said the reason it is being presented to the Council is that Minnesota Statutes require action on subdivision proposals within 120 days of application. If the City does not act the subdivision is considered approved. It is uncertain whether this provision would take precedence over the moratorium. Staff would proposed that the request for preliminary plat approval be denied due to the moratorium. The proponent would be free to re -apply following the lifting of the moratorium. Member Smith made a motion to deny the request for preliminary plat approval for Lot 6, Block 1, Edina Highlands because of the moratorium on subdivision of single family property. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Member Rice asked if the proponent understood the reasons for the recommended action. Planner Larsen said the attorney for the proponent was present. Peter Beck, 7900 Xerxes Avenue South, stated that he represented the owner of the subject property, Steven Utne. He said that he had read the staff report and was aware that the recommendation was for denial because of the moratorium. Mr. Beck requested that the Council consider the subdivision proposal on its merits. The proposal was first submitted to the City in August, 1988, was subsequently revised at staff's suggestion and resubmitted in November. It has been reviewed by the P Community Development and Planning Commission twice and the plat was well along when the moratorium took effect. Mr. Beck stated that the subdivision complies with zoning ordinance requirements and staff had recommended approval subject to some conditions that the proponent had agreed to. To defer the plat for a year would work a substantial hardship on Mr. Utne and is unfair. He asked that, in the event it is denied solely because of the moratorium, the Council direct staff to proceed as expeditiously as possible on the studies contemplated by the moratorium so that the proponent could re -apply during the summer building season. For the benefit of the new Council Members, Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly asked for a review of the Planning Commission's action on the proposed subdivision. Planner Larsen stated that it was considered by the Planning Commission on two occasions and both times denial was recommended. He said staff was working diligently on some proposals concerning subdivisions for the Council's consideration that would lead to ending the moratorium as soon as possible.. Mike Bolen, 5207 Doncaster Way, stated his objections to the proposed subdivision and pointed out the fact that 50% of the property owners in the neighborhood had appeared at the Planning Commission hearings to object. Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly then called the motion on the floor. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly Motion carried. (Mayor Richards returned and assumed the chair at this point.) RESOLUTION ADOPTED REGARDING RECORDING SUBDIVISIONS AT HENNEPIN COUNTY Planner Larsen explained that when a subdivision or any division of property for tax purposes is approved it must be recorded at Hennepin County to be officially of record. It appears that there are some divisions for tax purposes that Hennepin County could make without the City's approval. Currently, the County has advised the City when a tax parcel was being divided and sought information from the City as to compliance with its subdivision laws. Staff would recommend adoption of a resolution, according to Minnesota Statutes, Section 272.162, to be filed to insure that the County contacts the City regarding compliance. Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Marcella M. Daehn does hereby certify as follows: That she is the City Clerk of the City of Edina and that following is a true and correct excerpt of a Resolution adopted by the City Council on March 6, 1989: RESOLVED, that all property within the boundaries of the City of Edina shall be subject to the restrictions on transfers and divisions contained in Minnesota Statutes Annotated, Section 272.162 and any amendment thereto. Dated this 6th day of March, 1989. City Clerk Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Rice. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED ON VACATION OF MAVELIZ DRIVE: VACATION GRANTED Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Engineer Fran Hoffman presented the following information concerning the request for vacation of Mavelle Drive, which had been initiated by the City and Hennepin County and is related to the issue of land taking on France Avenue for street reconstruction. During review of the 22 parcels that would be affected by the France Avenue reconstruction from West 70th Street to Minnesota Drive, it was evident that one parcel (Collins Interiors /Room & Board) would lose all of its parking on the France Avenue side of the site. This would result because of the taking of additional right of way to construct France Avenue to a six lane facility from the existing four lanes. Hennepin County and City staff have met with the property owners on several occasions to determine how the site might be reconstructed to serve all purposes. The County and City need the France Avenue right of way for the project; the property owners need parking spaces for the site. The site has a significant parking shortage according to City ordinances. All parties involved understand the need to eliminate as many curb cuts as possible from France Avenue for traffic safety, and to restore the site to an equal or better position than before the reconstruction. Engineer Hoffman said that staff has reviewed Mavelle Drive between France Avenue and Sandell as a possible way to restructure the site to accommodate all needs. Traffic counts conducted for one day indicated that very few vehicles use the existing Mavelle Drive. After an eleven hour manual count, only 74 vehicles drove the entire length of Mavelle Drive (one short block). Of those, only a very few were from the neighborhood. Engineer Hoffman then presented graphics illustrating _ the site as it exists today and the proposed reconfiguration that would move the parking from France Avenue to the proposed vacated Mavelle Drive right of way. The plan showed a 24 -foot wide roadway located on the southern portion -of the existing right of way. This would retain the ability for vehicles to move to and from France Avenue on Mavelle as currently exists. An alternative to vacating the Mavelle Drive right of way would be to negotiate a Final Development Plan for the site that would allow traffic through the site. Engineer Hoffman said staff has concluded that the proposed plan would address the needs of the City and County with regard to the France Avenue right of way and would leave the subject private property in equal or better condition than it is presently. The public benefits would include: 1) Elimination of three curb cuts on France Avenue, 2) Landscaped area adjacent to France Avenue, and 3) Ingress /egress through the site. All the utilities companies find the proposed vacation acceptable. Staff would recommend that Mavelle Drive be vacated, subject to agreement by Hennepin County, City of Edina and private property owners of the following: A. Private property owners would give necessary right of way for France Avenue expansion and agree to close three of the four curb cuts onto France Avenue. B. County would agree to pay for cost of re -doing the portions of the property fronting on France Avenue including landscaping, and costs of relocating the parking from France Avenue to the vacated Mavelle Drive area. C. City would vacate Mavelle Drive to accommodate new parking area. D. Parking lot arrangement would not require any new variances. E. Parking lot layout would not be altered without City approval. Engineer Hoffman reported that he had received two phone,calls regarding the issue. Two callers had said they currently use Mavelle Drive and want to be able to use it in the future. The third person suggested that the curb cuts on Sandell be closed. He also noted receipt of a letter from Margaret Strickland, 7000 Sandell Avenue - Unit 15, dated March 6, 1989 concerning vehicle and pedestrian traffic issues. Mayor Richards then called for public comment on the proposed vacation of Mavelle Drive. Tim Keane, Larkin & Hoffman, stated that he represented Martha and John Gabbert, the owners of the private property adjacent to Mavelle Drive. He expressed their support for the vacation of Mavelle Drive as recommended by City staff. Member Paulus asked questions about the building to.the right, 7100 France Avenue, as to its use and the parking demand for both sites. Martha Gabbert,.proponent, said that they had purchased the Calhoun Building to the right, that it was an office building and continues to be an office building. She stated that their professional design service now occupies that building. The building to the left, 7010 France Avenue, is under remodeling and that is where the Room & Board store will be moving. She explained that the former use of the building created a greater demand for parking than the current use because the former tenants were mostly one office tenants but also included two realty offices with many employees. Ms. Gabbert added that the need for parking on the site for Room & Board will also be decreased and that the proposed plan will provide more than enough parking. Margaret Strickland, 7000 Sandell Avenue, stated her concerns regarding access to France Avenue from Mavelle Drive and the problems residents in her building have with parking and in getting out on W. 70th Street because traffic blocks off Sandell Avenue. Mayor Richards suggested that the latter issue be referred to the Traffic Safety Committee. Russell Johnson, 4000 Hazelton Road, said he concurred with Mrs. Stickland's concerns about getting out on W. 70th Street because of the traffic. Angus Strand, 7000 Sandell Avenue, expressed his concerns about traffic problems that would be created for the neighborhood by the operation of the Room & Board store. Lois Thornton, previous owner of Edina Business Service and former tenant at 7100 France Avenue, commented on the hardship imposed on the former tenants of the building during the past months when rezoning was proposed for the building. She stated that she questioned the current use of the building in that it seemingly is is a retail operation. Marston Pearson, co -owner with parents of 4000 Mavelle Drive, said they were concerned about the traffic and urged that Mavelle be kept open as a public street. Mayor Richards asked for clarification of the existing Mavelle Drive and the staff recommendation. Engineer Hoffman said that the existing right of way is 60 feet wide and that the public street is 30 feet wide. The proposal is that a 24 foot right of way be retained as a public roadway by the street vacation process, or by the site plan approval procedure. The site plan approval procedure would mean that any change to the site in the future by the property owner would require approval by the Council. Member Rice asked what the zoning was for the two subject buildings and if the proposed uses were allowed. Planner Craig Larsen stated that the 7100 France building is zoned Planned Office District 1 (POD -1) and that the building at 7010 France Avenue is'zoned Planned Commercial District 2 (PCD -2). POD -1 zoning would permit the operation of the Room & Board store. He stated that his understanding of the professional design service, with some showrooms but no direct sales of products in /out of the building, would be an allowed use. Member Rice commented that he sympathized with the neighbors concerning access onto West 70th Street from Sandell, but that as pointed out it was a question for the Traffic Safety Committee. He commented that he felt Room & Board would generate a lot of vehicle trips per day. He said he had observed the site and had noted very little traffic using Mavelle Drive. However, he suggested that sight distance for egress onto. Sandell could be improved. Assuming the properties were properly zoned, he said he could support the proposal. Member Rice then moved approval of staff's recommendation that Mavelle Drive be vacated subject to conditions listed in the letter of intent signed by property owners and introduced the following resolution: RESOLUTION VACATING MAVELLE DRIVE WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council, adopted the 6th day of February, 1989, fixed a date for a public hearing on a proposed vacation of a portion of Mavelle Drive; WHEREAS, two weeks' published and posted notice of said hearing was given and the hearing was held on the 6th day of March, 1989, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the public that said street vacation be made; and WHEREAS, the Council has considered the extent to which the vacation affects existing easements within the area of the vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric, cable television or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, . and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon such street or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, that the following described portion of Mavelle Drive be'-and is hereby vacated effective as of March 6, 1989: Commencing at the Northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 3, Rearrangement of Blocks 1, 9 and Lot 1, Block 2, Stow's Edgemoor Addition, a recorded plat of Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence Northerly on an assumed bearing of North 00 degrees 15 minutes 40 seconds West 60 feet; thence West 200.00 feet; thence Southwest along.a curve concave to the Northwest with a chord bearing of South 18 degrees 00 minutes 40 seconds West, central angle of 36 degrees 32 minutes 40 seconds, a radius of 179.26 feet 114.34 feet; thence Southwesterly bearing 35 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West 29.03 feet; thence Northeasterly on a tangential curve concave to the Southeast with a central angle of 55 degrees, a radius of 54.21 feet 52.04 feet; thence East along the North line of said Lot 1 173.96 feet to the point of beginning and there terminating; except, however, that the City of Edina reserves in favor of itself a public right of way easement over the southerly 24 feet of Mavelle Drive. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk is authorized and directed to cause a notice of completion of proceedings to be prepared, entered in the transfer record of the County Auditor, and filed with the County Recorder in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus who commented that she felt this would facilitate final negotiations between Hennepin County and the property owner on the France Avenue reconstruction. Member Smith moved that the main motion be amended to state that Mavelle Drive be vacated, except for a 24 foot right of way, to be determined by the City Engineer, to be retained for public roadway. Motion for the amendment was seconded by Member Paulus. Discussion on the amendment included setback variances-that may be required, whether to use the street vacation process versus site plan approval process and maintenance of the public roadway by the City. Mayor Richards then called for rollcall vote on the amendment to the main motion. Ayes: Paulus, Smith, Richards Nays: Kelly, Rice Amendment carried. Member Smith moved that the main motion be amended to state that Mavelle Drive be vacated, subject to the condition that the public benefit be the trade -off of France Avenue right of way for additional parking on the vacated 36 feet of Mavelle Drive. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Amendment carried. , Mayor Richards moved that the main motion be amended to state that Mavelle Drive be vacated, subject to submission of a landscape plan, acceptable to the City, for the westerly portion of the site by the property owner. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Amendment carried. Mayor Richards moved that the main motion be amended to state that Mavelle Drive be vacated, subject to the condition that required variances be granted to the site specific. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Mayor Richards then called for rollcall vote on the main motion to adopt the resolution vacating Mavelle Drive, as amended. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Smith, Richards Nays: Rice Resolution adopted. PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED ON COLLECTION OF RECYCLABLE MATERIALS. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Mayor Richards stated that the public hearing was called to solicit comments on the single hauler system for collection of recyclables from R -1 and R -2 Districts of the City. Notification of the hearing was mailed to the residential garbage haulers and recycling contractors. In addition to calling for public hearing, the Council resolution of February 6 directed that: 1) The City begin the process to contract with a single hauler for city -wide recycling collection. 2) Recyclables shall be placed for collection in accordance with Ordinance No. 711 regarding garbage - at the rear of the premises out of view from the street or in a garage. 3) No cost shall be passed on to the residents, except through the general fund. 4) No rebate program to the resident would be instituted. 5) Funding should be obtained from Hennepin County for all eligible costs. Mayor Richards called for public comment from residents. Hearing none, he called for comment from haulers. Lynn Morgan, Waste Management, stated she was present to respond to any questions. Levering Wood, Recycling Commission Member, said he had nothing new to add. In response to Mayor Richards, Janet Chandler, Recycling Coordinator, said she hoped to have the Request for Proposals completed within a week so that it could be sent to haulers and recycling contractors. Member Kelly commented that at the Council Meeting of February 6 the subject of a mandatory recycling program was brought up and that she had voted against it. Subsequently, Member Smith had made available material on mandatory programs and after some thinking on the issue she said she would be open to reconsideration. Member Smith commented that, after reading some materials on the mandatory program of the City of Minneapolis, he felt Edina would -have a premier recycling program as proposed and that the Council should worry about mandating down the road. There being no further comment, Mayor Richards declared the public hearing closed. No formal action was taken. *BID AWARDED FOR PUMP & WELL RENOVATION #13 AND #16 Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for pump and well renovation #13 and #16 to recommended low bidder, Layne Minnesota Company, at $22,530.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR REPAIR TO WELL #6 Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for repair to Well #6 to recommended low bidder, Layne Minnesota Company, at $10,990.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR CUSHMAN REPLACEMENT Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for Cushman replacement to recommended low bidder, Cushman Motors, at $7,185.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR FIVE GOLF CARTS Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for replacement of five golf carts to recommended low bidder, Versatile Vehicles, at $10,594.00 less trade -in. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR MULTI- CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS RECORDING SYSTEM Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for multi - channel communications recording system to recommended low bidder, Pitney Bowes Company/Dictaphone, at $22,227.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR GROUNDSMASTER 327 SIDE MOWER Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for a Groundsmaster 327 side mower to recommended low bidder, MTI Distributing Company, at $6,532.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR REELMASTER 216 5 -BLADE MOWER Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for a Reelmaster 216 5 -blade mower to recommended low bidder, MTI Distributing Company, at $6,590.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR GREENS MOWER Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for a greens mower to recommended low bidder, MTI Distributing Company, at $6,705.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR JULY 4TH FIREWORKS Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for July 4th fireworks to sole bidder, Northern Lighter Pyrotechnics, at $5,900.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. RIGHT OF WAY PLAN APPROVED FOR FRANCE AVENUE FROM WEST 70TH STREET TO MINNESOTA DRIVE Engineer Hoffman presented the right of way plan for the France Avenue improvement from West 70th Street to Minnesota Drive (south City limits). He explained that on March 21, 1988 the Council had conducted a public hearing on the proposed reconstruction of France Avenue. The project would widen France Avenue from four to six lanes. The Council had approved a preliminary plan and passed a No Parking Resolution for both sides of France Avenue. Engineer Hoffman stated that Hennepin County has now submitted plans for right of way acquisition for portions of 22 parcels along France Avenue. The County is asking for approval of the right of way plan for the project. Staff has reviewed the plan and would recommend approval. Cost of right of way acquisition is estimated at $932,000.00. The costs will be split with Hennepin County and funded through County state aid, municipal state aid and special assessment. Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Plans for Hennepin County Project No. 8110A showing proposed alignment, profiles and right of way for the reconstruction of County State Aid Highway No. 17, within the limits of the City, as a State Aid Project, have been prepared and presented to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED: That said plans be in all things approved and that the City agrees to provide the enforcement for the prohibition of on- street parking on those portions of said Project No. 17 within its corporate limits. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL REPORT ON TWIN CITIES AIR TRAVEL DISCUSSED Mayor Richards referred to background information provided by Planner Craig Larsen. In 1987 the Legislature ordered two adequacy studies of the Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport. The Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) was directed to do a ten year study. The Metropolitan Council was directed to do a study for the year 2020. The Metropolitan Council study recommended a dual track approach to planning for future airport needs.- MAC has endorsed the dual track approach, as follows: 1. Planning for a new airport would begin immediately, including site selection and land banking. The new site would be selected by 1995. 2. Make capacity improvements to existing airport during the interim period. Mayor Richards informed the Council that he had attended a meeting of mayors of the Southwest sector. In attendance were mayors from Bloomington, Richfield, Eden Prairie, Burnsville, Minnetonka, Mendota Heights. The cities of Bloomington and Richfield are proposing to hire a consultant to analyze the data that has been compiled by the Metropolitan Council and MAC. They then propose to discuss whether or not they feel that data was adequate or was properly discussed concerning the economic impact of the dual track approach. The cities of Bloomington and Richfield are asking for the support of other municipalities, including the City of Edina, from a standpoint of dealing with the issue of whether or not the airport should be located where it presently is and not go forward with the dual tract approach which they feel will have a negative impact on present land values in the Southwest sector as well as incurring costs for acquiring land for the future. They will summarize the specific action that they are asking other cities to take, including possible financial participation. Mayor Richards said he had told the mayors that he would bring this to the Council for discussion as to participation. Following some discussion by the Council on the issue, Mayor Richards directed that the subject be placed on the March 20 Council Agenda for discussion and action when further information would be available as to the specific proposal of Richfield and Bloomington. PERPICH- JOHNSON CHILDREN'S AGENDA PROPOSAL REFERRED TO HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION Mayor Richards directed the Council's attention to a letter from Lieutenant Governor Marlene Johnson regarding the Children's Agenda proposal which reflects a $65.7 million commitment to child care programs and services, to physical and mental health for children, to drop -out prevention and to family support and parenting education. Lieutenant Governor Johnson had asked for support of the Children's Agenda by resolution of the Council. Following discussion of the proposal, Mayor Richards commented that there are a number of issues that are important to the Edina community and suggested that this be referred to the Human Relations Commission for review and recommendation as to what could be done on the local level. Also, that a letter be sent to Lieutenant Governor Johnson that we are concerned about the issues in the proposal and that we are considering what can be done at the local level. Motion was made by Member Kelly that the Children's Agenda proposal be referred to the Human Relations Commission for review and recommendation as to response at the local level. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards. - Motion carried. APPOINTMENTS TO COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES COMMITTEE CONFIRMED; HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD APPOINTMENTS DISCIISSED Mayor Richards recalled that at the last meeting the Council had consented to the appointment of Mary G. Strazz and Robert J. Wilkins to the Community Health Services Committee. Staff had recommended that one of the appointments be a provider. It has been verified that Mrs. Strazz is a registered nurse and does qualify as a provider. Mayor Richards confirmed the appointment of Mary G. Strazz and Robert J. Wilkins and added Matthew C. Peterson as the third appointee to the Committee. Motion was made by Member Smith for consent of the Mayor's additional appointment to the Community Health Services Committee of Matthew C. Peterson for a term to 2 -1 -91. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. .Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. Mayor Richards asked for input on appointments to the Heritage Preservation Board. Member Smith suggested that the Edina Historical Society be contacted to see if anyone from that group would be interested and volunteered,to make the inquiry. COUNCIL RESPONSIBILITIES/LIAISON TO BOARD AND COMMISSIONS DISCIISSED Mayor Richards asked the Council to think about the pros and cons of continuing the practice of having the Council Members serve as liaison to the various advisory board and commissions. He said that this would be placed on the March 20 Council Agenda for discussion and action. Member Kelly suggested that the issue be discussed at the Council's Strategic Planning Session on March 11. Member Smith commented that another question is that of the "job description ". It was informally agreed that the issue be included for discussion at the Strategic Planning Session. REPORT GIVEN ON PURCHASE OF WHITE OAKS LOTS Assistant Manager Gordon Hughes informed the Council that on February 15, 1989 an offer was extended to Kenneth J. and Barbara Monroe for the purchase of Lot 1, White Oaks Third Addition and Lot 9, White Oaks Second Addition at a proposed price of $26,600.00. The proposed purchase agreement contained an acceptance deadline of March 3, 1989; to date there has been no response. On March 1, 1989, staff contacted John Koneck, an attorney who previously represented the Monroes for the purpose of obtaining a telephone number for the Monroes at their Chicago address. Mr. Koneck advised staff that the property in question had been sold by the Monroes to Richard Andron approximately two months ago. He advised that the property had been sold via a contract for deed. Apparently this contract for deed has never been recorded with Hennepin County. Staff would recommend that the same offer presented to the Monroes should now be presented to Mr. Andron. Although Mr. Andron may have paid considerably more that the present estimated market value for the lots, staff feels that the offer should remain at $26,600.00. Member Kelly made a motion directing staff to extend the offer to the property owner for purchase of Lot 1, White Oaks Third Addition and Lot 9, White Oaks Second Addition for a price of $26,600.00. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *HEARING DATES SET FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith for adoption of the following resolutions: RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. P -S -46 (XER%ES AVENUE) 1. The City Engineer, having submitted to the Council a preliminary report as to the feasibility of the proposed sidewalk described in the form of Notice of Hearing set forth below, and as to the estimated cost of such improvement, said report is hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. This Council shall meet on Monday, lurch 20, 1989, at 7:00 p.m. in the Edina 'City Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested in said improvements. 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper once a week for two successive weeks, the second of which publication is to be not less than three days from the date of said meeting, and to mail notice to all affected properties in substantially the following form: (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 V. 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. P -S -46 %ER%ES AVENUE FROM WEST 60TH STREET TO VEST 62ND STREET The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall on Monday, March 20, 1989 at 7:00 P.M., to consider the following proposed improvements to be constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429. The approximate cost of said improvements are estimated by the City as set forth below: ESTIMATED COST %ER%ES AVENUE FROM WEST 60TH STREET TO WEST 62ND STREET SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. P -S -46' $24,378.48 The project is proposed to be funded by State Aid gas tax funds. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -283 AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. P- STS -190 1. The City Engineer, having submitted to the Council a preliminary report as to the feasibility of the proposed street and storm sewer improvements described in the form of Notice of Hearing set forth below, and as to the estimated cost of such improvements, said report is hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. This Council shall meet on Monday, April 3, 1989, at 7:00 p.m. in the Edina City Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested in said improvements. 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper once a week for two successive weeks, the second of which publication is to be not less than three days from the date of said meeting, and to mail notice to all affected properties in substantially the following form: (OFFICIAL PUBLICATION) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BLAKE ROAD - VERNON AVENUE TO PINE GROVE ROAD PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -283 S.A.P. 120 - 144 -10 STORM SETTER IMPROVEMENT NO. STS -190 The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall on Monday, April 3, 1989, at 7:00 P.K. to consider the following proposed improvements to be constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. The approximate cost of said improvements are estimated by Hennepin County and the City as set forth below: BLAKE ROAD - VERNON AVENUE TO PINE GROVE ROAD Permanent Street Surfacing with Concrete Curb Estimated Cost and Gutter and Sidewalk Improvement No. P -BA -283 Storm Sewer Improvement No. P- STS -190 Total $835,833.86 The area proposed to be assessed for a portion of the cost of the proposed improvements includes: Lot 8, Blks 1 & 2, Parkwood Knoll's 3rd; Lots 1 & 2 and 12 & 13, Blk 1, Parkwood Knolls 5th; Lot 9, Bik 1, Parkwood Knoll's 6th; Lot 9, Blks 1 & 2 Parkwood "Knoll's 7th; Lots 10 -12, Blk 1, Parkwood Knoll's 8th; Lot 1, Blks 1 b 2, Idlywood; Lots 1 -5, Blk 1, Idlywood 5th; Lot 4, Blk 2, Luce Highwood; Lot 5, Blk 3, Luce Highwood; Lots 16 & 17, Blk 1, Les Anderson's Highwood 2nd; Lot 1 be 8. Blk 1, Valley Park; Lot 1, Blk 1, Jones Knolls; Part of Lot A, RLS 194; RLS 1081; and Lot A & B, RLS 1286. These properties are proposed to be assessed at $20.00 per lineal foot of property abutting Blake Road. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. EDINA TRANSIT LEGISLATION UPDATE GIVEN Mayor Richards reported that Assistant Manager Hughes and he had appeared before the House and Senate committees on the legislation for the Edina transit system in the Southeast corridor of the City. The bill is reported favorably out of the committees and will be going to the tax committee,on the House side and the appropriations committee on the Senate side. TRAFFIC BACKUP AT VALLEY VIEW ROAD /169 NOTED Member Rice observed that there is a backup of morning southbound traffic exiting Highway 169 at Valley'View for vehicles going to Braemar or Washington Avenue. He said it was a dangerous situation and something needs to be done. Engineer Hoffman said this should be referred to MNDOT. FIRE DEPARTMENT COVERAGE ON TV NOTED Member Rice said that he had seen the Edina Fire Chief on television in connection with a recent residential firer Chief Paulfranz said that they had some problems with the hydrant which had been damaged by a vehicle and had not been.reported. This temporarily delayed attacking the fire with full water power. Water carried on the pumper truck was used while the second hydrant was hooked up. HIGH SCHOOL HOCKEY TEAM COMMENDED Member Rice stated that commendations were due the High School Hockey Team who won the consolation title in the state hockey tournament recently. Mayor Richards said that a resolution would be ready at the next meeting. APPRECIATION EXPRESSED FOR STAFF Member Paulus said she appreciated the assistance she has received from the staff in response to her questions on various subjects as she becomes oriented to serving on the Council. CONCERN VOICED REGARDING PRIVATE SNOW PLOWERS COVERING HYDRANTS Member Smith said he was concerned about the private snow plowers who clear driveways but in doing so move the snow and cover up hydrants. He said he hoped the regulations concerning this would be included in future communications with the residents. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL'S INVOLVEMENT IN ISSUES QUESTIONED Member Kelly referred to to a recent meeting of SHHSC at which she received a copy of a booklet put out by the Future's Task Force of the Metropolitan Council which identified five issues for study: 1) Strengthening Early Childhood Development, 2) Re- thinking Education, 3) Dealing with a Broad Range of Drug Problems, 4) Renewing,Civic Activism, and 5) Monitoring the Region's Liveability, e.g. affordable housing, traffic congestion, etc. She said this means the Council is moving in an entirely different direction than what they have been involved in before. She questioned whether the Council should be involved in some of these issues. Member Kelly suggested that the Council discuss this at the upcoming Council Strategic Planning Session. INFORMATION SHEET ON EDINA'S SANITARY SEWER & WATER RATES AND STORM SEWER UTILITY APPRECIATED Member Kelly said that she has received a lot of compliments on the information sheet included with sewer and water billings concerning Edina's sewer and water rates and the storm sewer utility. She said it was a fine communication and good public relations for the community. COMPLAINT ABOUT FULL DUMPSTERS AT JERRY'S NOTED Member Kelly asked that the staff do something about the full dumpsters behind Jerry's that apparently are disfunctional. She said that it was an unhealthy situation and that trash is falling all over. REPORT ON HALIFAX AVENUE TRAFFIC MONITORING REQUESTED Member Kelly asked for a report on traffic monitoring on Halifax Avenue from W. 51st Street south which was of major concern to residents last year. PROPERTY TAX REFORM BOOKLET FROM HENNEPIN COUNTY NOTED Mayor Richards referred to a booklet from Hennepin County regarding property tax reform. He suggested that staff do an analysis on the data for the Council. COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLANNING RETREAT TO BE HELD AT ARNESON ACRES Manager Rosland advised the Council that the Strategic Planning Retreat scheduled for Saturday morning, March 11 will be held at the Arneson Acres Park building beginning at 8:30 a.m. - instead of the Braemar Clubhouse as previously indicated. ' *CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith for approval of payment of claims as per pre -list dated 3/6/89: General Fund $112,597.97, Art Center $10,161.47, Capital Fund $2,389.98, Swimming Pool Fund $1,046.00, Golf Course Fund $51,266.33, Recreation Center Fund $3,716.38, Edinborough Park $9,056.78, Utility Fund $242,537.60, Liquor Dispensary Fund $6,085.96, Construction Fund $14,719.50, Total $453,577.97. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the meeting adjourned at 10:40 p.m. City Clerk MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MARCH 20, 1989 The meeting was called to order by Mayor Richards at 7:00 p.m. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Richards. RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION ADOPTED FOR EDINA HIGH SCHOOL HOCKEY TEAM Mayor Richards moved the following resolution of commendation which was adopted unanimously: RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION EDINA HIGH SCHOOL 1988 -89 HOCKEY TEAM WHEREAS, the Edina High School 1988 -89 Hockey Team were Lake Conference Champions, Section VI Champions and Consolation Champions in the State Tournament; and WHEREAS, success has come to the members of the team because of their extra- ordinary ability, hours of practice, and leadership of their coaches; and WHEREAS, as representatives of the City of Edina, the members of the team exemplified the highest standards of athletic proficiency and good sportsmanship; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that sincere congratulations be extended to members of the team: Matt Bertram, Greg Chapman, Jay Chapman, Matt Cronin, Chris Garvin, Chad Hardie, Mike Hiniker, Josh Hoekstra, Chris Justice, Nick Kennedy, Chad Lindell, Chris Lindell, J. Lindsay, Tom Nevers, John Peterson, Dan Plante, Noel Rahn, Mike Shaffer, Mike Terwilliger, Chad VanderTop, Chris Hall, Eric Merchant, and Jeff Sorem, and to their coaches Willard. Ikola, Bart Larson and Robert O'Connor. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be recorded in the Minutes of the Edina City Council and that copies be given to members of the team. ADOPTED this 20th day of March, 1989. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented,-with the exception of the removal of item XI.B. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF DECEMBER 5 AND 19. SPECIAL MEETINGS OF DECEMBER 5 AND 13_ AND _YEAR-END MEETING OF DECEMBER 19. 1988 APPROVED Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to approve the minutes of the regular meetings of December 5 and 19, special meetings of December 5 and 13 and year -end meeting of December 19, 1988. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *PUBLIC HEARING ON SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. 5 -46 (XERXES AVENUE) CONTINUED TO APRIL 3. 1989 Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to continue the public hearing do Sidewalk Improvement No. S -46 (Xerxes Avenue from W. 60th Street to W. 62nd Street) to April 3, 1989. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. FINAL PLAT APPROVED FOR FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE ADDITION Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Craig Larsen presented the,request for final plat approval for Fairview Southdale Addition, generally located east of France Avenue and north of West 65th Street. He stated that this a non - residential subdivision and therefore is not subject to the subdivision moratorium. The plat would create two lots at the Fairview - Southdale complex. Lot 1 would include the hospital, the power plant and all parking and common areas; Lot 2 would accommodate the building pad for the proposed medical office building. Y The Council granted preliminary plat approval on February 21, 1989. The Board of Appeals on March 2, 1989 granted the necessary variances to allow construction of the new medical office building. In June of 1987, the Council approved plans for the new medical building, subject to certain conditions. One of those conditions was an assessment agreement with the hospital to pay a portion of the cost of signalizing 65th Street and Drew Avenue. At this date, the hospital is presently reviewing the agreement which would limit their participation to 25% of the cost. It is expected that the agreement will be executed shortly. Staff would recommend final plat approval subject to receipt of the executed assessment agreement. In response to Member Kelly's concern that the agreement will actually be signed, Planner Larsen said that a building permit will not be issued until the executed agreement is received by the City. Member Kelly commented that her concern with the. traffic signal was to ensure that emergency vehicles could get to the hospital with the growth and development on the subject property. Member Smith made a motion to adopt the following resolution, subject to receipt of an executed assessment agreement to pay a portion of the cost of signalizing 65th Street and Drew Avenue: RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL FIAT FOR FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE ADDITION ", platted by Fairview Hospital and Healthcare Services, a Minnesota corporation, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of March 20, 1989, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. *HEARING DATE SET FOR YEAR %V CDBG PROGRAM Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice setting April 3, 1989 as hearing date for Year %V of the Community Block Grant Program. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR ONE MILLION GALLON FLUTED COLUMN WATER TOWER Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for a one million gallon fluted column water tower to recommended low bidder, Pitt -Des Moines, Inc., at $872,250.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR VAN VALKENBURG PARK RECREATION BUILDING Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice'for award of bid for construction of the Van Valkenburg Park Recreation Building to recommended low bidder, Engco General Contractors, at $132,330.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR VAN VALKENBURG PARK SOFTBALL FIELD FENCING & BACKSTOPS Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for Van Valkenburg Park softball field fencing and backstops to recommended low bidder, Finley Brothers Enterprises, at $37,332.91. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF 3114/89 APPROVED Member Rice moved approval of the following recommended action listed in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of March 14, 1989: 1) To install "STOP" sign on northbound Beard Avenue at the intersection of West 54th Street; to install "STOP" signs on east and vest bound West Fuller Street at Beard Avenue; to check the northwest quadrant of Drev Avenue and West Fuller Street for possible clearviev violations; to assign the Traffic Enforcement Unit to this area to conduct speed enforcement activities and consider possible advisory signing which might improve the situation; 2) To reduce the parking restrictions for the seven parking stalls on the vest side of the service drive at Americana Bank to "ONE HOUR PARKING" to conform with adjacent parking, and also to continue to alloy parking on the north side of West 51st Street for the nest 120 days; and to acknowledge Sections B and C of the Minutes. Motion to approve the minutes was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. MSP INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT EXPANSION STUDIES DISCUSSED: RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT ADOPTED Mayor Richards reviewed the letter dated March 13, 1989, that he had received from Steven Quam, Mayor of the City Richfield, concerning airport issues as a follow -up to the meeting of mayors of the Southwest sector. The City Council of Bloomington and Richfield are considering a plan to supplement and independently assess information developed in the Metropolitan Council Airport Adequacy Task Force Study and in the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) ten year plan. Their concern is the effort of some groups to conclude that a new airport is -- desirable before the real impact of that action has been fairly investigated and before the need has been clearly established. There has been no serious effort to quantify the economic costs to the south and west suburbs, and to the major downtowns, of moving the airport to a distant site. Neither has there been a real evaluation of costs to the state of providing the infrastructure to relocate the airport. Also, the inconsistencies between the Metropolitan Council and the MAC projections as to future capacity requirements and the investigation of MSP potential expansion alternatives raises serious questions as to whether a new airport will be required. Bloomington and Richfield have asked the City of Edina, together with other municipalities, to consider helping to address these and other concerns enumerated in the draft Request for Proposals. At the March 6th meeting of mayors there was a consensus that the study would be most effective if it provided a balanced analysis of the question of whether a new airport is necessary or even desirable. That would be accomplished by coordinating existing data with new information developed on questions that must be considered before a balanced evaluation can made. The City of Edina has been invited to participate in providing advice to develop an effective study, to endorse same, and to provide financial participation as it may feel is appropriate. Member Paulus commented that the proposal as to financial participation is too vague. Mayor Richards explained that the estimated cost of the study is $100,000. Richfield has agreed to pay $50,000 towards the study; Bloomington has adopted a resolution of support but their vote for financial support was 4 -3. Bloomington's mayor has indicated that if other communities make financial commitments, they would revisit the funding issue. Member Rice observed that he felt everyone would like to get better information on the airport issues. However, he said he was somewhat disappointed in the Request for Proposal and was not sure that this was the way to get the information. He stated that the airport was very important, that he thought it was a good airport, but that none of the Council were qualified to make a judgement on the airport adequacy. He said he was in favor of supporting our neighboring communities but that. he was uncomfortable with the proposal as presented because it in effect asked for certain conclusions. He suggested that staff review the Request for Proposal to see how they perceive it as to adequacy. Mayor Richards commented that he felt the airport was important where it is from the standpoint of the Edina community. He said he would support a resolution indicating to Richfield And Bloomington that we feel that to be the case; that he would support funding by Edina of $1,000 -2,000 to assist in defraying the costs of the study. Member Smith said that he felt the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul should also participate in the cost of the study if one of the issues is for the airport to remain where it presently is. He also said that if the airport is to remain, then the communities who will be most affected by the air traffic should also consider the issues involved in expanding the present airport. He stated that he was not in favor of what is being proposed. Member Kelly made a motion that the Mayor write a letter to the City of Richfield in support of the study and also express the Council's concerns about the airport and the studies that have been done, that Edina would like to have input in the Request for Proposal, and that the City of Edina is willing to participate without specifying any amount of money. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Mayor Richards commented that there is a strong constituency in Minneapolis that wants the airport to be relocated. He said that he felt the airport at its present location is important to Edina and that he hoped the Council would support the proposal, including funding. i Debate followed as to the focus of the study, the adequacy of the Request for Proposal, whether or not participation should be broadened to include other ' municipalities, and staff's review of the document for clarification. It was suggested that representatives of the cities of Richfield and Bloomington be asked to make a presentation to the Council on the proposal. Mayor Richards then called the question on the motion. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith Nays: Richards Motion carried. UPDATE GIVEN ON PURCHASE OF WHITE OAKS LOTS Assistant Manager Hughes gave an update on the purchase of the White Oaks lots. On March 7, 1989, staff presented a purchase agreement to Richard J. Andron and Andron, Inc., relative to the White Oaks lots. The agreement proposed the City's purchase of both lots for $16,600.00. On March 14 staff received a letter from Mr. Andron advising that Andron, Inc. had entered into a contract to design and build a home on a portion of the subject properties. Under the circumstances, Mr. Andron advised that it was not possible or feasible to consider the City's offer. Also, on March 14, 1989, staff received an application for a building permit for a new single family dwelling on the subject property. Staff has done a preliminary review of the building permit application. Based on this review, it appears that the proposed dwelling does not comply with the required front yard setback. Staff has previously requested that a building permit application for this property must be accompanied by soils investigations as well as engineering studies dealing with,storm water drainage for the site. The application.was not accompanied by soils investigation or by the requested engineering studies. Presumably, those would be generated and submitted if' requested by the City. w 1. Staff would request additional direction from the Council concerning the proposed purchase of these lots. Although Mr. Andron's present building permit application does not comply with the Zoning Ordinance, it is conceivable ?that the plan could be revised to comply with the setback requirements. At this point, staff is unsure if the poor soils conditions and the drainage concerns on the property could be overcome. If they can, Mr. Andron may be in the position to request that the City issue a building permit for the property. Cliff Code, 4704 Townes Road, advised that the White Oaks Improvement Association has sent out a solicitation letter to raise one -half of the $26,600.00 purchase price offer which they expect to be able to accomplish. Mayor Richards explained that Mr. Andron has indicated that he is not interested in the offer to purchase the lots which was extended to him and has applied for a building permit for a new single family dwelling on the property. Mr. Code reiterated the position of the White Oaks residents that the property should be retained as.a natural area. Assuming the property is for sale, Mayor Richards asked if the White Oaks residents had discussed the possibility of having to raise one -half of the price paid by Mr. Andron for the property purported to be $75,000. Mr. Code said there has been no conversation regarding that as they felt the assessed valuation presumably was a fair valuation. Member Paulus said that it sounded like the White Oaks residents were asking the City to not recognize the subject property as a legal, buildable lot. She asked Mr. Code if they did not feel that the present owner was within his legal rights. In response, Mr. Code said it has not been proven that a house can built there because of the soil conditions and drainage problems. Member Paulus asked for a legal opinion as to the property being a buildable lot if it can meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and the building department. Attorney Erickson stated that it is an existing platted lot and if the owner can meet the building code requirements and zoning requirements he can build on it. Member Smith commented that the owner has applied for a building permit with some deficiencies, that staff should respond to it in the normal fashion, and if the owner cannot meet the requirements of the City's ordinances and codes so that the house is buildable, then we are back to negotiating on a price for the property. Member Rice asked why the City would ever want to buy the property if it turned out to not be buildable because the ordinance and code requirements could not be met. Manager Rosland clarified that if the builder can meet all the requirements of the City and a building permit is then issued, the Council may not see this matter on the agenda again and that he wanted the Council to be aware that this could occur. Mayor Richards clarified that the only commitment made by the City to this point, regarding the purchase of the subject property, was that the City was willing to fund one -half of the purchase offer that was extended to the present owner. Member Paulus said that she could not support the City's matching of funds to purchase the property at the market value. Following further discussion, it was informally agreed by the Council that staff be directed to follow the normal process concerning applications for building permits and to keep the Council advised. INSURANCE RENEWALS DISCUSSED Manager Rosland advised the Council that staff would propose to follow the practice of the past several years with regard to insurance renewals as outlined in a memorandum dated March 17, 1989 from Ceil Smith, Assistant to City Manager. Briefly, the method that the City has used to procure insurance coverage has been to have various agents take the City's insurance specifications into the insurance marketplace in order to secure premium quotations. The premium quotations are then analyzed using the City's actual losses during past years to estimate potential premiums based on the quotations. A recommendation would then be presented to the Council for response by authorizing the purchase of the insurance. The City has enjoyed an excellent relationship between the agents and the companies. As a result, the City has had an active approach to insurance coverage and risk reduction. The benefit to the City has been a direct savings in premium costs. Member Smith said that he felt the process was fine but that he would like to have the individual agents and their relationships with the companies identified. It was informally agreed by the Council that staff should proceed to obtain quotations for the City's insurance renewals using the same procedure as was used in the past several years and to keep the Council informed as to progress. REAPPOINTMENTS TO HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD APPROVED Mayor Richards announced that he would be reappointing the members of the Heritage Preservation Board whose terms were up as of February 1. He added that the Board would be informed that the Council is aware of their need for someone to serve on the Board with architectural expertise. Motion vas made by Member Smith for consent of the Mayor's reappointments to the Heritage Preservation Board as follows: David Gepner, John Metil, Lois Wilder and Donald Wray for terms to 2 -1 -91. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. CITY /COUNTY /PROPERTY OWNER NEGOTIATIONS REGARDING MAVELLE DRIVE APPROVED Engineer Hoffman recalled that the Council on March 6, 1989 indicated a willingness to vacate Mavelle Drive, subject to maintenance of a 24 foot public easement, with additional landscaping on the west side of the property at 7010 France Avenue. Also a concern of use was discussed with the property owner. The Planning staff has reviewed the ordinances and current conditions of the sites at 7010 and 7100 France Avenue and has confirmed that the proposed uses are permitted in the respective zones. The property owners have made it clear that no additional covenants will be acceptable on the land as a result of these negotiations. Hennepin County has been contacted and verbally has committed to cooperate on an agreement in which the reconstruction of the two sites, 7010 and 7100 France Avenue, would be the compensation given in exchange for the necessary right of way for the reconstruction of France Avenue. Staff would recommend execution of an agreement with the following provisions: 1. Property owners will grant appropriate highway easement for France Avenue. 2. Property owners will provide appropriate landscaping on the west side of the properties at property owners' expense. 3. City will vacate a portion of Mavelle Drive to allow for restructuring of parking on the vacated Mavelle Drive per plan presented. No additional variances are needed for the site plan. New plan will maintain a 24 foot public easement from France Avenue to Sandell Avenue. 4. Hennepin County will agree to reimburse appropriate reconstruction costs to meet the new site plan. Member Smith raised questions as to retaining an easement versus owning the public roadway and who would be responsible for plowing and paving it: Engineer Hoffman stated that the City would maintain the roadway and plow it. If it were re- paved, the cost would be assessed back to the benefited property owners. Attorney Erickson clarified that the City would retain an easement for the public roadway; that every street in town is platted and that by the platting the City obtains an easement for a public street. The underlying property is actually owned by the adjoining property owners. Member Rice referred to the site plan and said he was concerned about the entrance to the parking lot of the southerly property. Engineer Hoffman said that, to the extent that staff can make a geometric change and make the two driveways work, they will reconstruct that entrance to respond to the traffic safety issue. Tim Keane, Larkin & Hoffman, representing the property owners, said he saw no problem with a minor reconfiguring of the parking lot entrance. Member Rice also referred to the landscaping materials which the property owners have agreed to furnish for the west property lines of 7010 and 7100 France Avenue and asked if staff felt that was adequate to meet the concerns of the neighbors. Engineer Hoffman responded that in staff's opinion what has been described is adequate. Mr. Keane, representing the property owners, apologized for the Gabberts' absence and said he wanted to clarify the following points: 1. The plan and the need for the three party agreement is brought about by Hennepin County's reconstruction of France Avenue. Gabberts would be happy with the status quo - the existing access and existing parking arrangement. 2. They believe that the plan as presented by the City Engineer is a creative solution and one that they support. 3. The letter submitted by the Gabberts clears up their commitment regarding landscaping on the west property lines. 4. The property owners are not agreeing to pay °for any reconstruction costs for Mavelle Drive to accomplish the new site plan. Engineer Hoffman clarified that under the right of way negotiations Hennepin County has agreed to pay for appropriate reconstruction costs on the France Avenue side and whatever side yard work is needed. Mayor Richards asked Mr. Keane if he understood the zoning status of 7010 and 7100 France Avenue South as set out by the Planning Department and that any change in use in the future would have to meet the code requirements. Mr. Keane responded that he understood and that they are not assuming vested rights for all PC -2 zoning uses for purposes of parking. Member Smith moved adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that it hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor and Manager to execute the appropriate agreement with Hennepin County and the property owners of 7010 and 7100 France Avenue South which includes: 1. Property owners will grant appropriate highway easement for France Avenue. 2. Property owners will provide appropriate landscaping on the west side of the properties at property owners' expense. 3. City will vacate a portion of Mavelle Drive to allow for restructuring of parking on the vacated Mavelle Drive per plan presented. New plan will maintain a 24 foot public easement from France Avenue to Sandell Avenue. 4. Hennepin County will agree to reimburse appropriate reconstruction costs to meet the new site plan. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded.by Member Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. *NEW UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR 5017 AND 5033 VERNON AVENUE TO BE EXECUTED Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF NEV UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR 5017 AND 5033 VERNON AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that it hereby authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to execute, on behalf of the City of Edina, new utility easements for 5017 and 5033 Vernon Avenue. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *RESOLUTION ADOPTED AUTHORIZING ELECTION AGREEMENT WITH INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 273 Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION APPROVING ELECTION AGREEMENT WITH INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 273 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that it hereby approves the election agreement with Independent School District No. 273 as presented at the Council Meeting of March 20, 1989; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and Manager are hereby directed and authorized to execute the agreement on behalf of the City. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BEER LICENSE RENEWALS APPROVED Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for approval of beer license renewals for the following establishments: On -Sale - Biltmore Bowl, Braemar Golf Course, Braemar Golf Dome, Bravo! Italian Specialties, Corelli's Pizza b Pasta, Daytons Food Service, Edina American Legion Post, Ediuer Restaurant, Empress Restaurant, Good Earth _ Restaurant, Jerrys Foods-(also off - sale), Normandale Golf Course, Original.Pancake House, Pantry Restaurant, Southdale Bowl, Szechuan Star Restaurant, T J's Family Restaurant, and The Lotus III; Off -Sale - Edina Superette, Holiday Stations, Inc., Kenny Markets, Red Owl Country Store, and SuperAmerica Station. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. POTENTIAL HUD HOMES PROGRAM IN CITY DISCUSSED Member Kelly mentioned that at a recent meeting of SHHSC she had learned that Phil Dommer, Associate Planner, has been working with the Cornerstone Advocacy Service who is trying to find HUD homes for AFDC mothers in a program whereby they would become self- sufficient. Churches would also be involved. Member Kelly said she thought it was.a good idea, but that it should go before the Human Relations Commission or the Planning Commission before it was brought to the Council. She said she was surprised because she did not know of a HUD home available in Edina. Also, SHHSC gave the impression that Edina had committed to the program. Planner Craig Larsen explained that at this point the program has only been talked about at the staff level. Staff has attended several meetings on the program with agencies such as HUD,. Cornerstone, Simpson Church and their affiliates. Simpson Church will place a homeless family in a HUD home for a year. Cornerstone has a narrower emphasis on women and children. He said no commitments have been made so far and that any misconceptions would be cleared up. Manager Rosland said that he, too, would have some concerns about the project. Staff will get more information on the program and will advise the Council. ANNUAL MEETING FOR FRIENDS OF H.O.M.E. NOTED Member Kelly informed the Council that the first annual meeting for Friends of H.O.M.E. will be held on March 22 at Hillcrest United Methodist Church in Bloomington and that she would not be able to attend. She said she would appreciate it if someone from the staff could go to the meeting to show support. She said that she felt the H.O.M.E. program is one that is of great benefit to the residents of Edina. PUBLICITY FOR COUNCIL /ADVISORY BOARD & COMMISSION MEMBERS DISCUSSED Member Paulus said that she felt an article should be placed in the Edina Sun - Current regarding the Council /Advisory Board & Commissions Annual Dinner Meeting so that the general public would be aware of those individuals serving as board /commission members. She added that these people put in many hours at meetings in which recommendations are made to the Council. Although the Council does a good job in thanking them personally, she felt the community should be made aware of their contribution and commitment. Member Paulus also said she was concerned about communication with the candidates for boards and commissions who had not been appointed. She felt that there were many good candidates and wanted to be sure they did not get discouraged because there were so few openings. Member Kelly explained that in the past a letter has been sent to those who were not selected stating that their applications would remain on file to be considered when a vacancy does occur. REPORT GIVEN ON TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT ON HALIFAX AVENUE Manager Rosland reviewed the report of Captain Kleven concerning traffic enforcement on Halifax Avenue. During the months of October, November and December, 1988 and January, 1989, the Traffic Enforcement Unit provided in excess of 25 hours of intense traffic enforcement on Halifax Avenue. The report indicated that the compliance rate was extremely high when compared to other residential streets in the community. The Traffic Enforcement Unit will again monitor the area during the month of April to assure compliance as the fair weather seasons approaches. LMCLIgM LEGISLATIVE CONFERENCE NOTED Manager Rosland directed the Council's attention to the LMC /AMM Legislative Conference to be held on March 29, 1989 at the St. Paul Radisson. He advised that he will attend and asked the Council to let his office know if they plan to attend so that reservations can be made. RESOLUTION ADOPTED RELATING TO $5,300,000 G.O. TAXABLE TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1989; AWARDING SALE, FIXING FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR EXECUTION AND DELIVERY THEREOF AND SECURITY THEREFOR The City Clerk presented affidavits showing publication of the Notice of Bond Sale of $5,300,000 General Obligation Taxable Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1989 of the City in a legal newspaper having general circulation in the City, and in a daily or weekly periodical published in a Minnesota city of the'first class, which circulates throughout the state and furnishes financial news as a part of its service, as required by law and as directed by a resolution of the City Council adopted February 21, 1989. The affidavits were examined, found to comply with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475 and directed to be filed in the office of the City Clerk. The City Manager reported that four sealed bids for the $5,300,000 General Obligation Taxable Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1989 had been received prior to the time designated in the Notice of Bond Sale for the opening of the bids. Pursuant to the Notice of Bond Sale and Terms and Conditions of Sale the bids have been opened, read and tabulated and the terms of each have been determined to be as follows: Name of Bidder FIRST BANK N.A. MINNEAPOLIS DAIN BOSWORTH, INC. NORWEST INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC. PIPER JAFFRAY & HOPWOOD; INC. Interest Rates 10.00- 1995/02 10.10- 2003/04 10.20- 2005/06 10.25- 2007/09 Bid For Principal $5,225,800.00 Total Interest Cost -Net Average Rate $8,623,277.08 10.2729% THE NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY Allison - Williams Company American National Bank St. Paul Miller Securities, Inc. Smith, Barney, Harris Upham & Co. Inc. Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc. Craig Hallum Dougherty, Dawkins, Strand & Yost, Inc. John G. Kinnard Marquette Bank Minneapolis, N.A. M.H. Novick & Company, Inc. Park Investment Corp. Summit Investment Corp. Juran & Moody, Inc. FIRST BOSTON CORPORATION 10.00- 1995/99 10.125- 2000/03 10.25- 2004/09 PRUDENTIAL -BACHE CAPITAL 10.20- 1995/98 FUNDING 10.25- 1999/02 SHEARSON LEHMAN HUTTON INC. 10.30- 2003/06 DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS INC. 10.35- 2007/09 CLAYTON BROWN & ASSOCIATES 10.25 - 1995/99 INC. 10.30- 2000/02 10.35- 2003/05 10.375- 2006/09 $5,212,760.75 $5,210,430.00 $5,220.500.00 $8,663,275.71 10.3205% $8,751,378.33 10.4255% $8,772,151.01 10.4502% Member.Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO $5,300,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAXABLE TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1989; AWARDING THE SALE, FIXING THE FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR THE EXECUTION THEREOF AND THE SECURITY THEREFOR BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), as follows: Section 1. Recitals: Authorization and Sale of Bonds. 1.01. Authorization. Pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178 and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, the City Council of the City has authorized the issuance and sale of its General Obligation Tag Increment Taxable Bonds, Series 1989 (the Bonds) in the principal amount of $5,300,000 for the purpose of providing funds for the payment of the public redevelopment costs needed for a redevelopment project (the Project), to be undertaken in accordance with the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the Plan), previously established by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Edina (the Authority) and approved by the City. $90,000 of the principal amount of the Bonds represents interest as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.56. The Authority has established two tax increment financing districts in the area subject to the Plan, which districts have been designated by Hennepin County as No. 1201 and No. 1203 (the Districts). 1.02. Sale of Bonds. Notice of the sale of the Bonds was duly published as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60. Pursuant to the Notice of Bond Sale and the Terms and Conditions of Sale, four sealed bids for the purchase of the Bonds were received at or before the time specified for receipt of bids. The bids have been opened and publicly read and considered, and the purchase price, interest rates and net interest cost under the terms of each bid have been determined. The most favorable proposal received is that of First Bank National Association, of Minneapolis, Minnesota, and associates (the Purchaser), to purchase the Bonds at a price of $5,225,800, plus accrued interest from the date of the Bonds to the date of delivery thereof, the Bonds to bear interest at the rates set forth in Section 3.01. The proposal is hereby accepted, and the Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute a contract on the part of the City for the sale of the Bonds with the Purchaser. The good faith checks of the unsuccessful bidders shall be returned forthwith. 1.03. Performance of Requirements. All acts, conditions and things which are required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the valid issuance of the Bonds having been done, existing, having happened and having been performed, it is now necessary for this Council to establish the form and terms of the Bonds, to provide security therefor and to issue the Bonds forthwith. 1.04. Maturities. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.54, subdivision 17, this Council hereby estimates that the tax increment from the Districts pledged herein to the payment of the Bonds are sufficient to pay when due the principal of and interest on the Bonds. Section 2. Form of 'Bonds. 2.01. Bond Form. The Bonds shall be prepared in substantially the following form: No. (Face of the Bonds] UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA GENERAL OBLIGATION TAXABLE TAX INCREMENT BOND SERIES 1989 E3 Date of Rate Maturity Original Issue CUSIP April 1, 1989 REGISTERED OWNER: PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS DOLLARS THE CITY OF EDINA, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the City), acknowledges itself to be indebted and, for value received, hereby promises to pay to the registered owner named above, or registered assigns, the principal amount specified above, on the maturity date specified above, with interest thereon from the date of original issue specified above, or the most recent interest payment date to which interest has been paid or duly provided for, at the annual rate specified above. Interest hereon is payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing August 1, 1989, to the person in whose name this .Bond is registered at the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month, all subject to the provisions referred to herein with respect to the redemption of the principal of this Bond before maturity. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof at the principal office of the Bond Registrar hereafter designated, the principal hereof, are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft of First Trust National Association, in St. Paul, Minnesota, a$ Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the Bond Registrar), or its successor designated under the Resolution described herein. Additional provisions of this Bond are contained on the reverse hereof and such provisions shall for all purposes have the same effect as though fully set forth hereon. This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution until the Certificate of Authentication hereon shall have been executed by the Bond Registrar by manual signature of one of its authorized representatives. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Edina, Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed by the facsimile signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager and by a printed facsimile of the official seal of the City and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the date set forth below. (Facsimile Signature) (Facsimile Signature) City Manager Mayor (Facsimile Seal) Date of Authentication: CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION ` This is one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned within. FIRST TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Bond Registrar By Authorized Representative (Reverse of the Bonds] This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $5,300,000 (the "Bonds "), issued pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on March 20, 1989 (the "Resolution ") to pay the capital and administrative costs of a redevelopment project to be undertaken in accordance with the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan ") of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "Authority "), which Redevelopment Plan covers certain property located in the City. This Bond is issued pursuant to and in full conformity with the provisions of the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota thereunto enabling, including Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178 and Chapter 475. The Bonds are payable primarily from tax increments to be derived by the City from two tax increment financing districts established by the Authority in the area subject to the Redevelopment Plan (the-- "Districts ") which have been pledged to the payment of the Bonds by the Resolution. -In addition, for the full and prompt payment of the principal and interest on the Bonds as the same become due, the full faith, credit and taxing power of the City have been and are irrevocably pledged. The Bonds are issuable only as fully registered bonds, in denominations of $5,000 or any multiple thereof, of single maturities. Bonds maturing in the years 1995 through 1998 are payable on their respective stated maturity dates without option of prior payment, but Bonds having stated maturity dates in the years 1999 and later years are each subject to redemption and prepayment, at the option of the City and in whole or in part, and if in part, in inverse order of maturities and in $5,000 principal amounts selected by lot within a'maturity, on February 1, 1998 and on any interest payment date thereafter, at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued to the date of redemption. At least thirty days prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond, notice of the call for redemption will be published in a daily or weekly periodical, published in a Minnesota city of the first class or its metropolitan area, which'circulates throughout the state and furnishes financial news as a part of its service, and will be mailed to the Bond Registrar and to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed at his address appearing in the Bond Register, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions of Bonds so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price therein specified, and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bonds or portions of Bonds shall cease to bear interest. Upon partial redemption of any Bond, a new Bond or Bonds will be delivered to the registered owner without charge, representing the remaining principal amount outstanding. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Bond Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by his attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Bond Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or his attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange, the City will cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. The City and the Bond Registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond in order to make it a valid and binding general obligation of the City according to its terms have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed in regular and due form as so required; that prior to the issuance hereof, the City has pledged and appropriated tax increments to be derived by the City from the Districts to a sinking fund established for the payment of the Bonds; that, if necessary for the payment of the principal and interest on the Bonds, the City is required by law to levy ad valorem taxes upon all taxable property within the City without limitation as to rate or amount; and that the issuance of this Bond does not cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation. The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to the applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM -- as tenants UNIF GIFT MIN ACT..... Custodian..... in common (Cust) (Minor) TEN ENT -- as tenants by the entireties under Uniform Gifts to JT TEN -- as joint tenants Minors with right of survivorship.and Act ..................... not as tenants in (State) common (State) Additional,abbreviations may also be used. ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints attorney to transfer the within Bond on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE: NOTICE: The signatures to this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration or any change whatsoever. Signature(s) must be guaranteed by a commercial bank or trust company or by a brokerage firm having a membership in one of the major stock exchanges. 2.02. Form of Certificate. A certificate in substantially the following form shall appear on the reverse side of each Bond, following a copy of the text of the legal opinion of Bond Counsel: We certify that the above is a full, true and correct copy of the legal opinion rendered by Bond Counsel on the issue of Bonds of the City of Edina which includes the within Bond, dated as of the date of delivery of and payment for the Bonds. (Facsimile signature) (Facsimile signature) City Manager Mayor Section 3. Bond Terms, Execution and Delivery. 3:01. Maturities, Interest Rates, Denominations, Payment. Dating of Bonds. The City shall forthwith issue and deliver the Bonds, which shall be denominated "General Obligation Taxable Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1989 ^. The Bonds shall be dated initially as of April 1, 1989, and shall be issuable in the denomination of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof, shall mature on February 1 in the years and amounts set forth below, and Bonds maturing in such years and amounts shall bear interest from April 1, 1989 until paid or duly called for redemption at the rates per annum shown opposite such years and amounts as follows: Year Amount Rate Year Amount Rate 1995 $125,000 10.00% 2003 $325,000 10.10% 1996 50,000 10.00 2004 375,000 10.10 1997 75,000 10.00 2005 375,000 10.20 1998 125,000 10.00 2006 400,000 10.20 1999 175,000 10.00 2007 700,000 10.25 2000 225,000 10.00 2008 875,000 10.25 2001 250,000 10.00 2009 950,000 10.25 2002 275,000 10.00 The Bonds shall be issuable only in fully registered form, of single maturities. The interest thereon and, upon surrender of a Bond at the principal office of the Registrar described herein, the principal amount thereof, shall be payable by check or -draft issued by the Registrar. Each Bond shall be dated by the Registrar as of the date of its authentication. 3.02. Interest Payment Dates. Interest on the Bonds shall be payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing August 1, 1989, to the owner of record thereof as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the immediately preceding month, whether or not such day is a business day. 3.03. Registration. The City shall appoint, and shall maintain, a bond registrar, transfer agent and paying agent (the Registrar). The effect of registration and the rights and duties of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto shall be as follows: (a) Register. The Registrar shall keep at its principal corporate trust office a bond register in which the Registrar shall provide for the registration of ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged. (b) Transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender to the Registrar for transfer of any Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner thereof or by an attorney duly authorized by the registered owner in writing, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the transferor. The Registrar may, however, close the books for registration of any transfer after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each interest payment date and until such interest payment date. (c) Exchange of Bonds. Whenever any Bond is surrendered by the registered owner for exchange, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the registered owner or the owner's attorney duly authorized in writing. (d) Cancellation. All Bonds surrendered upon any transfer or exchange shall be promptly cancelled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. (e) Improver or unauthorized Transfer. When any Bond is presented to the Registrar for transfer, the Registrar may refuse to transfer the same until it is satisfied that the endorsement on such Bond or separate instrument of transfer is legally authorized. The Registrar shall incur no liability for its refusal, in good faith, to make transfers which it, in its judgment, deems improper or unauthorized. (f) Persons Deemed Owners. The City and the Registrar may treat the person in whose name any Bond is at any time registered in the bond register as the absolute owner of such -Bond, whether such Bond shall be overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal of and interest on such Bond and for all other purposes, and all such payments so made to any such registered owner or upon the owner's order shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability of the City upon such Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. (g) Taxes. Fees and Charges. For every transfer or exchange of Bonds (except for an exchange upon a partial redemption of a Bond), the Registrar may impose a charge upon the owner thereof sufficient to reimburse the Registrar for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. (h) Mutilated. Lost. Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. In case any Bond shall become mutilated or be lost, stolen or destroyed, the Registrar shall deliver a new Bond of like amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of any such mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in substitution for any such Bond lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in connection therewith; and, in the case of a Bond lost, stolen or destroyed, upon filing with the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that such Bond was lost, stolen or destroyed, and of the ownership thereof, and upon furnishing to the Registrar of an appropriate bond or indemnity in form, substance and amount satisfactory to it, in which both the City and the Registrar shall be named as obligees. All Bonds so surrendered to the Registrar shall be cancelled by it and evidence of such cancellation shall be given to the City. If the mutilated, lost, stolen or destroyed Bond has already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms, it shall not be necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment. (i) Authenticating Agent. The Registrar is hereby designated authenticating agent for the Bonds, within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.55, Subdivision 1. 3.04. Appointment of Initial Registrar. The City hereby appoints First Trust National Association, of St: Paul, Minnesota, as the initial Registrar. The Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, a contract with First Trust National Association, as Registrar. Upon merger or consolidation of the Registrar with another corporation, if the resulting corporation is a bank or trust company authorized by law to conduct such business, such.corporation shall be authorized to act as successor Registrar. The City ,agrees to pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for the services performed. The City reserves the right to remove any Registrar upon thirty (30) days' notice and upon the appointment of a successor Registrar, in which event the predecessor Registrar shall deliver all cash and Bonds in its possession to the successor Registrar. On or before each principal or interest due date, without further order of this Council, the City Manager shall transmit to the Registrar from the Bond Fund, as hereinafter defined, moneys sufficient for the payment of all principal and interest then due on the Bonds. 3.05. Redemption. Bonds maturing in the years 1995 through 1998 are payable on their respective stated maturity dates without option of prior payment, but Bonds maturing in 1999 and later years are each subject to redemption, at the option of the City and in whole or in part, and if in part, in inverse order of maturities, and within any maturity, in $5,000 principal amounts selected by the Registrar by lot, on February 1, 1998 and on any interest payment date thereafter at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. At least thirty days prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond, the City shall cause notice of the call for redemption to be published in a daily or weekly periodical published in a Minnesota city of the first class or its metropolitan area, which circulates throughout the state and furnishes financial news as a part of its service, and to be mailed to the Registrar and to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond not affected by such defect or failure. The notice of redemption shall specify the redemption date, redemption price, the numbers, interest rates and CUSIP numbers of the Bonds to be redeemed and the place at which the Bonds are to be surrendered for payment, which is the principal office -of the Registrar. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions thereof so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price therein specified and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bonds or portions thereof shall cease to bear interest. In addition to the notice prescribed by the preceding paragraph, the City shall also give, or cause to be given, notice of the redemption of any Bond or Bonds or portions thereof at least 35 days before the redemption date by certified mail or telecopy to the Purchaser and all registered securities depositories then in the business of holding substantial amounts of obligations of the character of the Bonds (such depositories now being The Depository Trust Company, of Garden City, New York; Midwest Securities Trust Company, of Chicago, Illinois; Pacific Securities Depository Trust Company, of San Francisco, California; and Philadelphia Depository Trust Company, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) and one or more national information services that disseminate information regarding municipal bond redemptions; provided that any defect in or any failure to give any notice of redemption prescribed by this paragraph shall not affect the validity of the proceedings for the redemption of any Bond or portion thereof. Bonds in a denomination larger than $5,000 may be redeemed in part in any integral multiple of $5,000. The owner of any Bond redeemed in part shall receive, upon surrender of such Bond to the Registrar, one or more new Bonds in authorized denominations equal in principal amount to the unredeemed portion of the Bond so surrendered. 3.06. Preparation and Delivery. The Bonds shall be prepared under the direction of the City Manager and shall be executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager, and shall be sealed with the official corporate seal of the City; provided that said signatures and the corporation seal may be printed, engraved, or lithographed facsimiles thereof. In case any officer whose signature, or a facsimile of whose signature, shall appear on the Bonds shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of any Bond, such signature or facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if such officer had remained in office until delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, no Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this Resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication on such Bond has been duly executed by the manual signature of an 'authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same representative. The executed certificate of authentication on each Bond shall be conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this Resolution. When the Bonds have been so executed and authenticated, they shall be delivered by the City Manager to the Purchaser upon payment of the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the Purchaser shall not be obligated to see to the application of the purchase price. Section 4. Security Provisions. 4.01. Construction Fund. A Construction Fund is hereby created, as a special fund and designated on the books of the City as the "1989 Taxable Tax Increment Bonds Construction Fund" (the Construction Fund), to be held and administered by the City Finance Director - Treasurer separate and apart from all other funds of the City. The City hereby appropriates to the Construction Fund all of the proceeds received from the sale of the Bonds, less the amount to be deposited in the Bond Fund, pursuant to Section 4.02 hereof. Moneys on hand in the Construction Fund from time to time shall be used solely to pay capital and administrative costs of the Authority and the City in connection with the Project as set forth in the Plan. Any amounts remaining in the Construction Fund upon completion or termination of the Project and payment of all the costs thereof shall be transferred to the Bond Fund or used to pay capital and administrative costs of the Authority and the City in connection with any other development —4—+- TMmrciinnt *n tifa Pl wn 4.02. Bond Fund. A Bond Func designated on the books of the Cit] Fund (the Bond Fund), to be held ai separate and apart from all other i interest on the.Bonds to be issued of the costs of the Project shall 1 of the Bonds or any additional bon( made payable from the Bond Fund, ai interest thereon unpaid, the City ] as a separate and special account 1 premium, if any, and interest on tl bonds now or hereafter issued by t] costs incurred by the City in accoi any other redevelopment project to City hereby irrevocably appropriate the Bonds and any amount in excess from the Purchaser upon,delivery of the District designated by Hennepii the Authority to pay the Bonds, (c; designated by Hennepin County as Ni which are appropriated by the City by the City in connection with its to Section 4.04 of'a resolution ads (the 1981 Bond Resolution), and (d; the terms of this Resolution to thl is hereby created, as a special fund and as the 1989 Taxable Tax Increment Bonds Bond d administered by the City Finance Director unds of the City. The principal of and at the same time as the Bonds to pay a portion e payable from the Bond Fund. So long as any s issued pursuant to Section 4.04 hereof and e outstanding and any principal thereof or inance Director shall maintain the Bond Fund, o be used for the payment of the principal of, e Bonds, and on all other general obligation e City and made payable therefrom, to finance dance with the Plan in aid of the Project and be undertaken in accordance with the Plan. The s to the Bond Fund (a) the accrued interest on of $5,210,000 bid for the Bonds and received the Bonds, (b) the tax increments derived from County as No. 1203 received by the City from tax increment derived by the District 1201 received by the City from the Authority to the Bond Fund from the Bond Fund established General Obligation Bonds, Series 1981 pursuant ,pted by the City Council on October 5, 1981 any other moneys appropriated or pledged by Bond Fund. The City expressly reserves the right to use amounts in the Bond Fund (other than the amounts initially deposited therein upon the issuance of the Bonds) to finance or pay directly costs paid or incurred by the City pursuant to the Plan in connection with the Project and any other projects to be undertaken in accordance with the Plan. 4.03. Full Faith and Credit Pledged. The full faith and credit and taxing power of the City shall be and are hereby irrevocably pledged for the prompt and full payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds. It is estimated that the tax increment from the Districts and other funds herein pledged for the payment of the Bonds will be collected in amounts not less than five percent in excess of the amounts needed to meet when due the principal of and interest on the Bonds as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61. Consequently, no ad valorem taxes are now levied to pay the Bonds or the interest to come due thereon, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178, subdivision 2. If the money on hand in the Bond Fund should at any time be insufficient to pay principal and Interest due on all bonds payable therefrom, such amounts shall be paid from any other fund of the City and such other fund shall be reimbursed therefor when sufficient moneys are available in the Bond Fund. If on October 1 in any year the sum of the balance in the Bond Fund plus the amount of tax increment to be derived from the District is not sufficient to pay when due all principal and interest to become due on all bonds payable therefrom in the following calendar year, or the Bond Fund has incurred a deficiency in the manner provided in this Section 4.03, a direct, irrepealable, ad valorem tax shall be levied on all taxable property within the corporate limits of the City for the purpose of restoring such accumulated or anticipated deficiency in accordance with the provisions of this Resolution. 4.04. Additional Bonds. The City reserves the right to issue additional bonds payable from the Bond Fund and tax increments to be derived from the Districts as may be required to finance costs of the Project not financed hereby or to finance costs of other projects to be undertaken in accordance with the Plan. 4.05. Additional Bonds Under 1981 Bond Resolution. Since the Bonds will be payable in part from tax increment derived from the District designated by Hennepin County as No. 1201, the Bonds constitute "additional bonds" payable from the Bond Fund established by the 1981 Bond Resolution and are authorized to be issued by Section 4.07 of the 1981 Bond Resolution: 4.06 Execution of Documents. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute and deliver on behalf of the City such documents as may be appropriate to evidence the pledge and appropriation of the tax increments from the Districts from the Authority to the City to pay the bonds. Section 5. Defeasance. When any Bond has been discharged as provided in this Section 5, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this resolution to the holders of such Bonds shall cease, and such Bonds shall no longer be deemed to be outstanding under this Resolution. The City may discharge its obligations with respect to any Bond which is due'on any date by irrevocably depositing with the Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full; or, if any Bond should not be paid when due, the City may nevertheless discharge its obligations with respect thereto by depositing with the Registrar a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued to the date of such deposit. The City may also discharge its obligations with respect to any prepayable Bond according to its terms, by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full provided that notice of the redemption thereof has been duly given as provided in Section 3.05. The City may also at any time discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds, subject to the provisions of law now or hereafter authorizing and regulating such action, by depositing irrevocably in escrow, with a bank qualified by law as an escrow agent for this purpose, cash or securities which are authorized by law to be so deposited, bearing interest payable at such times and at such rates and maturing on such dates as shall be required, without reinvestment, to-pay all principal and interest to become due thereon to maturity, or if notice of .ti redemption as herein required has been duly provided for, to such earlier redemption date. Section 6. County Auditor Registration. Certification of Proceedings. Approval of Official Statement. Authorization of Certain Payments and Combination of Maturities. 6.01. County Auditor Registration. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Auditor of Hennepin County, together with such other information as the County Auditor shall require, and to obtain from said County Auditor a certificate that the Bonds have been entered on his bond register as required by law. 6.02. Certification of Proceedings. The officers of the City and the County Auditor of Hennepin County are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser and to Dorsey be Whitney, Bond Counsel, certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City, and such other affidavits, certificates and information as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the Bonds as the same appear from the books and records under their custody and control or as otherwise known to them, and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the City as to the facts recited therein. 6.03.. Official Statement. The Official Statement relating to the Bonds, dated March 6, 1989, prepared and distributed on behalf of the City by Public Financial Systems Inc., is hereby approved. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to execute such certificates as may be appropriate concerning the accuracy, completeness and sufficiency of the Official Statement. Adopted by the City Council on March 20, 1989. ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member Rice and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards and the following voted against the same: Kelly whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, and was signed by the Mayor, whose signature was attested by the City Clerk., RESOLUTION ADOPTED REIATING TO $8.425.000 G.O. TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1989: AWARDING SALE, FIKING FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR EXECUTION AND DELIVERY THEREOF AND SECURITY THEREFOR The City Clerk presented affidavits showing publication of the Notice of Bond Sale of $8,425,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1989 of the City in a legal newspaper having general circulation in the City, and in a daily or weekly periodical published in a Minnesota city of the first class, which circulates throughout the state and furnishes financial news as a part of its service, as required by law and as directed by a resolution of the City Council adopted February 21, 1989. The affidavits were examined, found to comply with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475 and directed to be filed in the office of the City.Clerk. The City Manager reported that six sealed bids for the $8,425,000 General Obligation Tax'Increment Bonds, Series 1989 had been received prior to the time designated in the Notice of Bond Sale for the opening of the bids. Pursuant to the Notice of Bond Sale and Terms and Conditions of Sale the bids have been opened, read and tabulated and the terms of each have been determined'to be as follows: Name of Bidder FIRST BANK N.A. MINNEAPOLIS DAIN BOSWORTH INCORPORATED NORWEST INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC. PIPER JAFFRAY & HOPWOOD, INC. Allison - Williams Company American National Bank St. Paul Cronin & Co., Inc. Miller Securities, Inc. Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co., Inc. Craig Hallum Dougherty, Dawkins, Strand & Yost, Inc. John G. Kinnard Marquette Bank Minneapolis, N.A. M.H. Novick & Company, Inc. Park Investment Corp. Summit Investment Corp. Juran & Moody, Inc. McClees Investments, Inc. MERRILL LYNCH CAPITAL MARKETS PRUDENTIAL -BACHE CAPITAL FUNDING SHEARSON LEHMAN HUTTON INC DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS INC. CLAYTON BROWN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Interest Rates 6.80 -1995 6.90- 1996/97 6.95 -1998 7.00 -1999 7.05 -2000 7.10 -2001 7.15 -2002 7.20 -2003 7.25- 2004/06 7.30- 2007/09 7.00- 1995/00 7.10 -2001 7.20 -2002 7.30 -2003 7.40 -2004 7.45- 2005/09 7.00 -1995 7.05- 1996/99 7.10 -2000 7.15 -2001 7.20 -2002 7.25 -2003 7.30 -2004 7.35 -2005 7.40 -2006 7.45 -2007 7.50- 2008/09 7.00 - 1995/96 7.10 - 1997 -98 7.20 -1999 7.25 -2000 7.30- 2001/02 7.40- 2003/04 7.50- 2005/09 Bid For Principal $8,315,475.00 $8.285,218.25 $8,290.200.00 $8,297,921.75 r Total Interest Cost -Net Average Rate $9,762,631.25 7.3254% $9,974,050.50 7.4840% - $9,978,504.17 7.4873% $10,048,819.98 7.5401% HARRIS TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK 6.90- 1995/96 $8,285,145.00 $10,065,944.58 BEAR, STEARNS & CO. 7.00 -1997 7.5529% KIDDER, PEABODY & CO., INC. 7.10 -1998 Bank of Oklahoma, N.A. 7.20 -1999 Merchantile Bank N.A. 7.25 -2000 Hutchinson, Shockey, Erley 7.30 -2001 & Co. 7.35 -2002 Juran & Moody, Inc. 7.40 -2003 Stern Brothers & Co. 7.45 -2004 Blair (William) & Company 7.50- 2005/09 Van Kampen Merritt Inc. Illinois Company, Inc. Prescott, Ball & Turgen, Inc. JOHN NUVEEN & CO. INC. 7.00 -1995 7.05 -1996 7.10 -1997 7.15 -1998 7.20 -1999 7.25 -2000 7.30 -2001 7.40- 2002/03 7.50- 2004/09 $8,290,200.00 $10,071,985.42 7.5575% Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO $8,425,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1989; AWARDING THE SALE, FIXING THE FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR THE EXECUTION THEREOF AND THE SECURITY THEREFOR BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), as follows: Section 1. Authorization and Sale. 1.01. Authorization. Pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178 and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, the City Council of the City has authorized the issuance and sale of its General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1989 (the Bonds) in the principal amount of $8,425,000 for the purpose of providing funds for the payment of the public redevelopment costs needed for a redevelopment project (the Project), to be undertaken in accordance with the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the Plan), previously established by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Edina (the Authority) and approved by the City. $140,000 of the principal amount of the Bonds represents interest as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.56. The Authority has established two tax increment financing districts in the area subject to the Plan, which districts have been designated by Hennepin County as No. 1201 and No. 1203 (the Districts). 1.02. Sale of Bonds. Notice of the sale of the Bonds was duly published as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60. Pursuant to the Notice of Bond Sale and the Terms and Conditions of Sale, six sealed bids for the purchase of the Bonds were received at or before the time specified for receipt of bids. The bids have been opened and publicly read and considered, and the purchase price, interest rates and net interest cost under the terms of each bid have been determined. The most favorable proposal received is that of First Bank National Association, of Minneapolis, Minnesota, and associates (the Purchaser), to purchase the Bonds at a price of $8,315,475, plus accrued interest from the date of the Bonds to the date of delivery thereof, the Bonds to bear interest at the rates set forth in Section 3.01. The proposal is hereby accepted, and the Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute a contract on the part of the City for the sale of the Bonds with the Purchaser. The good faith checks of the unsuccessful bidders shall be returned forthwith. 1.03. Performance of Requirements. All acts, conditions and things which are required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the valid issuance of the Bonds having been done, existing, having happened and having been performed, it is now necessary for this Council to establish the form and terms of the Bonds, to provide security therefor and to issue the Bonds forthwith. 1.04. Maturities. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.54, subdivision 17, this Council hereby estimates that the tag increment from the Districts pledged herein to the payment of the Bonds are sufficient.to pay when due the principal of and interest on the Bonds. Section 2. Form of Bonds. 2.01. Bond Form. The Bonds shall be prepared in substantially the following form: (Face of the Bonds] UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BOND SERIES 1989 No. Date of Rate Maturity Original Issue CUSIP April 1, 1989 REGISTERED OWNER PRINCIPAL AMOUNT SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS DOLLARS THE CITY OF EDINA, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the City), acknowledges itself to be indebted and, for value received, hereby promises to pay to the registered owner named above, or registered assigns, the principal amount specified above, on the maturity date specified above, with interest thereon from the date of original issue specified above, or the most recent interest payment date to which interest has been paid or duly provided for, at the annual rate specified above, payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing August 1, 1989, to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month, all subject to the provisions referred to herein with respect to the redemption of the principal of this Bond before maturity. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof at the principal office of the Bond Registrar hereafter designated, the principal hereof, are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft of First Trust National Association, in St. Paul, Minnesota, as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the Bond Registrar), or its successor designated under the Resolution described herein. Additional provisions of this Bond are contained on the reverse hereof and such provisions shall for all purposes have the same effect as though fully set forth hereon. This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution until the Certificate of Authentication hereon shall have been executed by the Bond Registrar by manual signature of one of its authorized representatives. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Edina, Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed by the facsimile signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager and by a printed facsimile of the official seal of the City and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the date set forth below. Dated of Authentication: (Facsimile Signature) (Facsimile Signature) City Manager Mayor (Facsimile Seal) CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This is one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned within. FIRST TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Bond Registrar By Authorized Representative [Reverse of the Bonds] This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $8,425,000 (the "Bonds "), issued pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on February 21, 1989 (the "Resolution ") to pay the capital and administrative costs of a redevelopment project to be undertaken in accordance with the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan ") of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "Authority "), which Redevelopment Plan covers certain property located in the City. The Bond is issued pursuant to and in full conformity with the provisions of the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota thereunto enabling, including Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178 and Chapter 475. The Bonds are payable primarily from tax increments to be derived from two tax increments financing districts established by the Authority in the area subject to the Redevelopment Plan (the "Districts ") which have been pledged to the payment of the Bonds by the Resolution. In addition, for the full and prompt payment of the principal and interest on the Bonds as the same become due, the full faith, credit and taxing power of the City have been and are irrevocably pledged. The Bonds are issuable only as fully registered bonds, in denominations of $5,000 or any multiple thereof, of single maturities. Bonds maturing in the years 1995 through 1998 are payable on their respective stated maturity dates without option of prior payment, but Bonds having stated maturity dates in the years 1999 through 2009 are each subject to redemption and prepayment, at the option of the City in whole or in part, and if in part, in inverse order of maturities and in $5,000 principal amounts selected by lot, within any maturity, on February 1, 1998 and on any interest payment date thereafter, at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued to the date of redemption. At least thirty days prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond, notice of the call for redemption will be published in a daily or weekly periodical, published in a Minnesota city of the first class or,its metropolitan area, which circulates throughout the state and furnishes financial news as a part of its service, and will be mailed to the Bond Registrar and to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed at his address appearing in the Bond Register, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions of Bonds so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price therein specified, and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bonds or portions of Bonds shall cease to bear interest. Upon partial redemption of any Bond, a new Bond or Bonds will be delivered. to the registered owner without charge, representing the remaining principal amount outstanding. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Bond Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by his attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Bond Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or his attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange, the City will cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. The City and the Bond Registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND.AGREED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond in order to make it a valid and binding general obligation of the City according to its terms have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed in regular and due form as so required; that prior to the issuance hereof, the City has pledged and appropriated tax increments to be derived by the City from the Districts to a sinking fund established for the payment of the Bonds; that, if necessary for the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds, ad valorem taxes are required to be levied upon all taxable property in the City, which levy is not limited as to rate or amount; and that the issuance of this Bond does not cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation. The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to the applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM -- as tenants UNIF GIFT MIN ACT..... Custodian..... in common (Cust) (Minor) TEN ENT -- as tenants by the entireties under Uniform Gifts to JT TEN -- as joint tenants Minors with right of survivorship and Act ...................... not as tenants in (State) common Additional abbreviations may also be used. ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints attorney to transfer the within Bond on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER NOTICE: The signature to this OF ASSIGNEE: assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration or any change whatsoever. Signature(s) must be guaranteed by a commercial bank or trust company or by a brokerage firm having a membership in one of the major stock exchanges. 2.02. Form of Certificate. A certificate in substantially the following form shall appear on the reverse side of each Bond, following a copy of the teat of the legal opinion of Bond Counsel: We certify that the above is a full, true and correct copy of the legal opinion rendered by Bond Counsel on the issue of Bonds of the City-of Edina which includes the within Bond, dated as of the date of delivery of and payment for the Bonds. (Facsimile signature) (Facsimile signature) City Manager Mayor Section 3. Bond Terms. Execution and Delivery. 3.01. Maturities, Interest Rates, Denominations. Payment, and Dating of Bonds. The City shall forthwith issue and deliver the Bonds, which shall be denominated "General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1989 ". The Bonds shall be issuable in the denomination of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof, shall mature on February 1 in the years and amounts set forth below, and Bonds maturing in such years and amounts shall bear interest from date of issue until paid or duly called for redemption at the rates per annum shown opposite such years and amounts as follows: Year Amount Rate Year Amount Rate 1995 $225,000 6.80% 2003 $500,000 7.20% 1996 75,000 6.90 2004 575,000 7.25 1997 125,000 6.90 2005 600,000 7.25 1998 2009000 6.95 2006 700,000 7.25 1999 275,000 7.00 2007 1,100,000 7.30 2000 3509000 7.05 2008 1,375,000 7.30 2001 375,000 7 10 2009 1,500,000 7.30 2002 4509000 7.15 The Bonds shall be issuable only in fully registered form. The interest thereon and, upon surrender of each Bond, the principal amount thereof, shall be payable by check or draft issued by the Registrar described herein. Each Bond shall be dated as of its date of initial authentication. 3.02. Interest Payment Dates. Interest on the Bonds shall be payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing August 1, 1989, to the owner of record thereof as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the immediately preceding month, whether or not such day is a business day. 3.03. Registration. The City shall appoint, and shall maintain, a bond registrar, transfer agent and paying agent (the Registrar). The effect of registration and the rights and duties of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto shall be as follows: (a) Register. The Registrar shall keep at its principal corporate trust office a bond register in which the Registrar shall provide for the registration of ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged. (b) Transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender to the Registrar for transfer of any Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner thereof or by an attorney duly authorized by the registered owner in writing, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver, in the name of designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the transferor. The Registrar may, however, close the books for registration of any transfer after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each interest payment date and until such interest payment date. (c) Exchange of Bonds. Whenever any Bond is surrendered by the registered owner for exchange, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the registered owner or the owner's attorney duly authorized in writing. (d) Cancellation. All Bonds surrendered upon any transfer or exchange shall .be promptly cancelled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. (e) Improper or unauthorized Transfer. When any Bond is presented to the Registrar for transfer, the Registrar may refuse to transfer the same until it is satisfied that the endorsement on such Bond or separate instrument of transfer is legally authorized. The Registrar shall incur no liability for its refusal, in good faith, to make transfers which it, in its judgment, deems improper or unauthorized. (f) Persons Deemed Owners. The City and the Registrar may.treat the person in whose name any Bond is at any time registered in the bond register as the absolute owner of such Bond, whether such Bond shall be overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal of and interest on such Bond and for all other purposes, and all such payments so made to any such registered owner or upon the owner's order shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability of the City upon such Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. (g) .Taxes. Fees and Charges. For every transfer or exchange of Bonds (except for an exchange upon a partial redemption of a Bond), the Registrar may impose a charge upon the owner thereof sufficient to reimburse the Registrar for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. (h) Mutilated. Lost. Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. In case any Bond shall become mutilated or be lost, stolen or destroyed, the Registrar shall deliver a new Bond of like amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of any such mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in substitution for any such Bond lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in connection therewith; and, in the case of a Bond lost, stolen or destroyed, upon filing with the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that such Bond was lost, stolen or destroyed, and of the ownership thereof, and upon furnishing to the Registrar of an appropriate bond or indemnity in form, substance and amount satisfactory to it, in which both the City and the Registrar shall be named as obligees. All Bonds so surrendered to the Registrar shall be cancelled by it and evidence of such cancellation shall be given to the City. If the mutilated, lost, stolen or destroyed Bond has already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms, it shall not be necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment. (i) Authenticating Agent. The Registrar is hereby designated authenticating agent for the Bonds, within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.55, Subdivision 1. 3.04. Appointment of Initial Registrar. The City hereby appoints First Trust National Association, of St. Paul, Minnesota, as the initial Registrar. The Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, a contract with First Trust National Association, as Registrar. Upon merger or consolidation of the Registrar with another corporation, if the resulting corporation is a bank or trust company authorized by law to conduct such business, such corporation shall be authorized to act as successor Registrar. The City agrees to pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for the services performed. The City reserves the right to remove any Registrar upon thirty (30) days' notice and upon the appointment of a successor Registrar, in which event the predecessor Registrar shall deliver all cash and Bonds in its possession to the successor Registrar. On or before each principal or interest due date, without further order of this Council, the City Manager shall transmit to the Registrar from the Bond Fund, as hereinafter defined, moneys sufficient for the payment of all principal and interest then due on the Bonds. 3.05. Redemption. Bonds maturing in the years 1995 through 1998 shall not be subject to redemption prior to maturity, but Bonds maturing in the years 1999 through 2009 shall each be subject to redemption and prepayment, at the option of the City, in whole or in part, and if in part, in inverse order of maturities and, within any maturity, in $5,000 principal amounts selected by the Registrar by lot, on February 1, 1998 and on any interest payment date thereafter at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. At least thirty days prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond, the City Manager shall cause notice of the call for redemption to be published in a daily or weekly periodical published in a Minnesota city of the first class or its metropolitan area, which circulates throughout the state and furnishes financial news as a part of its service, and to be mailed to the Registrar and to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond not affected by such defect or failure. The notice of redemption shall specify the redemption date, redemption price, the numbers, interest rates and- CUSIP numbers of the Bonds to be redeemed and the place at which the Bonds are to be surrendered for payment, which is the principal office of the Registrar. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions thereof so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price therein. specified and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bonds or portions thereof shall cease to bear interest. In addition to the notice prescribed by the preceding paragraph, the City shall also give, or cause to be given, notice of the redemption of any Bond or Bonds or portions thereof at least 35 days before the redemption date by certified mail or telecopy to the Purchaser and all registered securities depositories then in the business of holding substantial amounts of obligations of the character of the Bonds (such depositories now being The Depository Trust Company, of Garden City, New York; Midwest Securities Trust Company, of Chicago, Illinois; Pacific Securities Depository Trust Company, of San Francisco, California; and Philadelphia Depository Trust Company, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) and one or more national information services that disseminate information regarding municipal bond redemptions; provided that any defect in or any failure to give any notice of redemption prescribed by this paragraph shall not affect the validity of the proceedings for the redemption of any Bond or portion thereof. Bonds in a denomination larger than $5,000 may be redeemed in part in any integral multiple of $5,000. The owner of any Bond redeemed in part shall receive, upon surrender of such Bond to the Registrar, one or more new Bonds in authorized denominations equal in principal amount to the unredeemed portion of the Bond so surrendered. 3.06. Preparation and Delivery. The Bonds shall be prepared under the direction of the City Manager and shall be executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager, and shall be sealed with the official corporate seal of the City; provided that said signatures and the corporation seal may be printed, engraved, or lithographed facsimiles thereof. In case any officer whose signature, or a facsimile of whose signature, shall appear on the Bonds shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of any Bond, such signature or facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if such officer had remained in office until delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, no Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this Resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication on such Bond has been duly executed by the manual signature of an authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same representative. The executed certificate of authentication on each Bond shall be conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this Resolution. When the Bonds have been so executed and authenticated, they shall be delivered by the City Manager to the purchaser thereof upon payment of the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the Purchaser shall not be obligated to see to the application of the purchase price. Section 4. Security Provisions. 4.01. Construction Fund. A Construction Fund is hereby created, as a special fund and designated on the books of the City as the "1989 Tax Exempt Tax Increment Bonds Construction Fund" (the Construction Fund), to be held and administered by the City Finance Director separate and apart from all other funds of the City. The City hereby appropriates to the Construction Fund all of the proceeds received from the sale of the Bonds, less the amount to be deposited in the Bond Fund, pursuant to Section 4.02 hereof. Moneys on hand in the Construction Fund from time to time shall be used solely to pay capital and administrative costs of the Authority and the City in connection with the Project as set forth in the Plan. Any amounts remaining in the Construction Fund upon completion or termination of the Project and payment of all the costs thereof shall be transferred to the Bond Fund or used to pay capital and administrative costs of the Authority and the City in connection with any other development project undertaken pursuant to the Plan. 4.02. Bond Fund. A Bond Fund is hereby created, as a special fund and designated on the books of the City as the 1989 Tax Exempt Tax Increment Bonds Bond Fund (the Bond Fund), to be held and administered by the City Finance Director separate and apart from all other funds of the City. The principal of and interest on the Bonds to be issued at the same time as the Bonds to pay a portion of the costs of the Project shall be payable from the Bond Fund. So long as any of the Bonds or any additional bonds issued pursuant to Section 4.04 hereof and made payable from the Bond Fund, are outstanding and any principal thereof or interest thereon unpaid, the City Finance Director shall maintain the Bond Fund, as a separate and special account to be used for the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds, and on all other general obligation bonds now or hereafter issued by the City and made payable therefrom, to finance costs incurred by the City in accordance with the Plan in aid of the Project and any other redevelopment project to be undertaken in accordance with the Plan. The City hereby irrevocably appropriates to the Bond Fund (a) the accrued interest on the Bonds and any amount in excess of $8,285,000 bid for the Bonds and received from the Purchaser upon delivery of the Bonds, (b) the tax increments derived from the District designated by Hennepin County as No. 1203 received by the City from the Authority to pay the Bonds, (c) tax increment derived by the District designated by Hennepin County as No. 1201 which are appropriated by the City to the Bond Fund from the Bond Fund established by the City in connection with its General Obligation Bonds, Series 1981 pursuant to Section 4.04 of a resolution adopted by the City Council on October 5, 1981 (the 1981 Bond Resolution), and (d) any other moneys appropriated or pledged by the terms of this Resolution to the Bond Fund. The City expressly reserves the right to use amounts in the Bond Fund (other than the amounts initially deposited therein upon the issuance of the Bonds) to finance or pay directly costs paid or incurred by the City pursuant to the Plan in connection with the Project and any other projects to be undertaken in accordance with the Plan. 4.03. Full Faith and Credit Pledged. The full faith and credit and taxing power of the City shall be and are hereby irrevocably pledged for the prompt and full payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds. It is estimated that the tax increment from the Districts and other funds herein pledged for the payment of the Bonds will be collected in amounts not less than five percent in excess of the amounts needed to meet when due the principal of and interest on the Bonds as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61. Consequently, no ad valorem taxes are now levied to pay the Bonds or the interest to come due thereon, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178, subdivision 2. If the money on hand in the Bond Fund should at any time be insufficient to pay principal and interest due on all bonds payable therefrom, such amounts shall be paid from any other fund of the City and such other fund shall be reimbursed therefor when sufficient moneys are available in the Bond Fund. If on October 1 in any year the sum of the balance in the Bond Fund plus the amount of tax increment to be derived from the District is not sufficient to pay when due all principal and interest to become due on all bonds payable therefrom in the following calendar year, or the Bond Fund has incurred a deficiency in the manner provided in this Section 4.03, a direct, irrepealable, ad valorem tax shall be levied on all taxable property within the corporate limits of the City for the purpose of restoring such accumulated or anticipated deficiency in accordance with the provisions of this Resolution. 4.04. Additional Bonds. The City reserves the right to issue additional bonds payable from the Bond Fund and tax increments to be derived from the Districts as may be required to finance costs of the Project not financed hereby or to finance costs of other projects to be undertaken in accordance with the Plan. 4.05. Additional Bonds Under 1981 Bond Resolution. Since the Bonds will be payable in part from tax increment derived the District designated by Hennepin County as No. 1201, the Bonds constitute "additional bonds" payable from the Bond Fund established by the 1981 Bond Resolution and are authorized to be issued by Section 4.07 of the 1981 Bond Resolution. 4.06 Execution of Documents. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute and deliver on behalf of the City such documents as may be appropriate to evidence the pledge and appropriation of the tax increments from the Districts by the Authority to the City to pay the bonds. Section 5. Defeasance. When any Bond has been discharged as provided in this section, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this resolution to the holders of such Bonds shall cease, and such Bonds shall no longer be deemed to be outstanding under this Resolution. The City may discharge its obligations with respect to any Bond which is due on any date by depositing with the paying agent on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full; or, if any Bond should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged by depositing with the paying agent a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued to the date of such deposit. The City may also discharge its obligations with respect to any prepayable Bond according to its terms, by depositing with the paying agent on or before that date an amount equal to the principal, interest and redemption premium, if any, which are then due, provided that notice of such redemption has been duly given as provided herein. The City may also at any time discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds, subject to the provisions of law now or hereafter authorizing and regulating such action, by depositing irrevocably in escrow, with a bank qualified by law as an escrow agent for this purpose, cash or securities which are authorized by law to be so deposited, bearing interest payable at such times and at such rates and maturing on such dates as shall be required to pay all principal, interest and redemption premiums to become due thereon to maturity or said redemption date. Section 6. County Auditor Registration, Certification of Proceedings, Investment of Moneys, Arbitrage, Designation of Bonds as Qualified Tax Exempt Obligations and Official Statement. 6.01. County Auditor Registration. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Auditor of Hennepin County, together with such other information as the County Auditor shall require, and to obtain from said County Auditor a certificate that the Bonds have been entered on his bond register as required by law. 6.02. Certification of Proceedings. The officers of the City and the County Auditor of Hennepin County are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser and to Dorsey & Whitney, Bond Counsel, certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City, and such other affidavits, certificates and information as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the Bonds as the same appear from the books and records under their custody and control or as otherwise known to them, and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the City as to the facts recited therein. 6.03. Tax Covenant. The City covenants and agrees with the holders from time to time of the Bonds that it will not take or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents any action which would cause the interest on the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder (the Regulations), and covenants to take any and all actions within its powers to ensure that the interest on the Bonds will not become subject to taxation under the Code and the Regulations. The City will cause to'be filed with the Secretary of Treasury an information reporting statement in the form and at the time prescribed by the Code. 6.04 Arbitrage Certification. The Mayor and City Manager, being the officers of the City charged with the responsibility for issuing the Bonds pursuant to this resolution, are authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the purchaser thereof a certificate.in accordance with the provisions of Section 148 of the Code, and Sections 1.103 -13, 1.103 -14 and 1.103 -15 of the Regulations, stating the facts, estimates and circumstances in existence on the date of issue and delivery of the Bonds which make it reasonable to expect that the proceeds of the Bonds will not be used in a manner that would cause the Bonds to be arbitrage bonds within the meaning of the Code and Regulations. 6.05 Compliance With Rebate Requirement. The City will not use the proceeds of the Bonds in such a manner as to cause the Bonds to be "arbitrage bonds" within the meaning of Section 148 of the Code and applicable Regulations; to this end, the City shall: (i) maintain records identifying all "gross proceeds" (as defined in Section 148(f)(6)(B) of the Code) attributable to the Bonds, the yield at which such gross proceeds are invested, any arbitrage profit derived therefrom (earnings in excess of the yield on the Bonds) and any earnings derived from the investment of such arbitrage profit: (ii) make, or cause to be made as of the anniversary date of the issuance of the Bonds, the annual determinations of the amount, if any, of excess arbitrage required to be paid to the United States by the City (the Rebate Amount); (iii) pay, or cause to be paid, to the United States at least once every five Bond Years the amount, if any, which is required to be paid to the United States, including the last installment which shall be made no later than 60 days after the day on which the Bonds are paid'in full; and (iv) retain all records of the annual determination of the foregoing amounts until six (6) years after the Bonds have been fully paid. In order to comply with the foregoing requirements, the City Finance Director shall determine the Rebate Amount within 30 days of each anniversary date of the issuance of the Bonds and upon payment in full of the Bonds and shall deposit such Rebate Amount in a separate account and shall separately account for the earnings from the investment of the Rebate Amount. In the event the foregoing requirements conflict with the requirements of the Regulations promulgated under Section 148(f) of the Code, the requirements of such Regulations shall be controlling. 6.06 Official Statement. The Official Statement, dated as of March 6, 1989, relating to the Bonds prepared and distributed by Public Financial Systems, Inc., the financial consultant for the City, is hereby approved, and the officers of the City are authorized in connection with the delivery of the Bonds to sign such certificates as may be necessary with respect to the completeness and accuracy of the Official Statement Adopted by the City Council on March 20, 1989. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member Rice and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards and the following voted against the same: Kelly whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, and was signed by the Mayor, whose signature was attested by the City Clerk. RESOLUTION ADOPTED RELATING TO $2.100.000 G.O. RECREATIONAL FACILITY BONDS, SERIES 1989: FIXING FORM AND DETAILS, PROVIDING FOR EXECUTION AND DELIVERY THEREOF AND SECURITY THEREFOR., The City Clerk presented affidavits showing publication of the Notice of Bond Sale for $2,100,000 General Obligation Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 1989 of the City in a legal newspaper having general circulation in the City, and in a daily or weekly periodical published in a Minnesota city of the first class, which circulates throughout the state and furnishes financial news as a part of its service, as required by law and as directed by a resolution of the Council adopted February 21, 1989. The affidavits were examined, found to comply with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475 and directed to be filed in the office of the City Clerk. The City Manager reported that three sealed bids for the $2,100,000 General Obligation Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 1989 had been received prior to the time designated in the Notice of Bond Sale for the opening of bids. Pursuant to the Notice of Bond Sale and the Terms and Conditions of Sale the bids have been opened, read and tabulated, and the terms of each have been determined to be as follows: Total Interest Interest Bid for Cost -Net Name of Bidder Rates Principal Average Rate FIRST BANK N.A. MINNEAPOLIS 6.75- 1992/93 $2,072,700.00 $1,988,743.75 DAIN BOSWORTH INCORPORATED 6.80- 1994/95 7.2901% NORWEST INVESTMENT SERVICES, 6.90- 1996/97 INC. 6.95 -1998 PIPER JAFFRAY & HOPWOOD 7.00 -1999 INC. 7.05 -2000 Allison - Williams Company 7.10 -2001 American National Bank 7.15 -2002 St. Paul 7.20 -2003 Cronin & Co., Inc. 7.25- 2004/06 Miller Securities, Inc. 7.30- 2007/09 Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co. Inc. Craig Hallum Dougherty, Dawkins, Strand & Yost, Inc. John G. Kinnard Marquette Bank Minneapolis, N.A. M.H. Novick & Company, Inc. Park Investment Corp. Summit Investment Corp. Juran & Moody, Inc. McClees Investment, Inc. PRUDENTIAL -BACHE CAPITAL 7.00- 1992/95 $2,069,004.00 $2,027,401.00 FUNDING 7.05- 1996/99 7.4318% SHEARSON LEHMAN HUTTON INC. 7.10 -2000 DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS INC. 7.15 -2001 7.20 -2002 7.25 -2003 7.30 -2004 7.35 -2005 7.40 -2006 7.45 -2007 7.50- 2008/09 CLAYTON BROWN & ASSOCIATES 7.00- 1992/96 $2,070.305.35 $2,045,647.77 INC. 7.10- 1997/98 7.4987% 7.20 -1999 7.25 -2000 7.30- 2001/02 7.40- 2003/04 7.50- 2005/09 Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO $2,100,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION RECREATIONAL FACILITY BONDS, SERIES 1989; FIXING THE FORM AND DETAILS, PROVIDING FOR THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY THEREOF AND THE SECURITY THEREFOR BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. Authorization. This Council by its resolution adopted February 21, 1989, which resolution is entitled "Resolution Relating to $2,100,000 General Obligation Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 1989 Authorizing the Issuance and Providing for the Public Sale Thereof," pursuant to Minnesota Laws 1961, Chapter 655 (the Act), authorized the issuance and sale of $2,100,000 General Obligation Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 1989, in order to finance the acquisition and betterment of certain improvements (the Improvements) to its municipal recreation facilities. $31,000 of the principal amount of the Bonds represents interest as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.56. The Improvements consist of an improvement to the Municipal Golf Center of the City (the Municipal Golf Center) described in Section 4 of the Resolution adopted by this Council on November 4, 1963, entitled "Resolution Establishing the Form and Terms and Covenants Securing the Payment of $825,000 Golf Course Bonds of 1963" (the Resolution of November 4, 1963). The Bonds are to be payable primarily out of the net revenues to be derived from the operation of the Municipal Golf Center, the Recreation Center (the Municipal Recreation Center) of the City described in Section 4 of the resolution adopted by this Council on August 2, 1965, entitled "Resolution Authorizing the Issuance of $450,000 Recreation Center Bonds, Describing Their Form and Details and Covenants with Respect Thereto" (the Resolution of August 2, 1965), and the Municipal Liquor Dispensary established by Ordinance No. 131 (the Municipal Liquor Dispensary). 1.02. Outstanding Bonds. There is currently payable out of net revenues to be derived from the Municipal Golf Center and the Municipal Liquor Dispensary the General Obligation Golf Course Bonds, Series 1985 of the City, dated as of September 1, 1985 (the Golf Course Bonds), and there is currently payable out of the net revenues to be derived -from the Municipal Golf Center, the Municipal Recreation Center and the Municipal Liquor Dispensary the General Obligation Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 1988 of the City, dated as of October 1, 1988 (the Recreational Facility Bonds). The Golf Course Bonds and the Recreational Facility Bonds are hereinafter together referred to as the Outstanding Bonds. The payment of principal of and interest on the Bonds shall be subordinate to the first lien and charge thereon, of the Golf Course Bonds on the net revenues of the Municipal Golf Center and -the net revenues of the Municipal Liquor Dispensary.' The payment of the principal of and interest in the Bonds shall be subordinate to the lien and charge thereon, of the Recreational Facility Bonds on the net revenues of the Municipal Golf Center, the net revenues of the Municipal Recreation Center and the net revenues of the Municipal Liquor Dispensary. 1.03. Findings. It is hereby found, determined and declared that net revenues derived from the operation of the Municipal Golf Center, the Municipal Recreation Center and the Municipal Liquor Dispensary, in excess of the costs of operation and maintenance thereof in the fiscal year which ended December 31, 1988, were in excess of $586,190, which amount exceeds the maximum amount of principal and interest to become due in any future fiscal year on all of the Outstanding Bonds and on the Bonds herein authorized. By Section 4.02 hereof the sum of $193,403 from the net revenues derived from the operation of the Municipal Golf Center, Municipal Recreation Center and /or Municipal Liquor Dispensary is appropriated and credited to a separate subaccount in the Bond Account, created pursuant to Section 4.02 hereof, which amount exceeds the average annual amount of principal and interest to become due on the Bonds. The City is therefore authorized by the Act to secure the Bonds by the covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth. In accordance with the Act the Bonds may be issued by_ resolution of this Council. All acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed preliminary to the issuance of and sale of the Bonds to provide moneys to pay for the Improvements.have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed in due form, time and manner as so required. 1.04. Sale. Notice of sale of the Bonds was duly published as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60. Pursuant to the Notice of Bond Sale and the Terms and Conditions of Sale, three sealed bids for the purchase of the Bonds were received at or before the time specified for receipt of bids. The bids have been opened and publicly read and considered, and the purchase price, interest rates and net interest cost under the terms of each bid have-been determined. The most favorable proposal received is that of First Bank National Association, of Minneapolis, Minnesota, and associates (the Purchaser), to purchase the Bonds at a price of $2,072,700 plus accrued interest from the date of the Bonds to the date of delivery thereof, the Bonds to bear interest at the rates set forth in Section 3.01. The proposal is hereby accepted and the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and'directed to execute a contract on the part of the City for the sale of the Bonds with the Purchaser. The good faith checks of the unsuccessful bidders shall be returned forthwith. 1.05. Issuance of Bonds. All acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen. and to be performed prior to the issuance of the Bonds have been done, do exist, have happened, and have been performed, wherefore it is now necessary for this Council to establish the form and terms of the Bonds, to provide for the security thereof, and to issue the Bonds forthwith. Section 2. Form of Bonds. 2.01. Form of Bonds. The Bonds shall be prepared in substantially the following form: r [Face of Bonds) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA GENERAL OBLIGATION RECREATIONAL FACILITY BOND, SERIES 1989 Date of Rate Maturity Original Issue CUSIP ,April 1, 1989 SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS REGISTERED OWNER: PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: DOLLARS THE CITY OF EDINA, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the City), acknowledges itself to be indebted and, for value received, hereby promises to pay to the registered owner above named, the principal amount indicated above, on the maturity date specified above, with interest thereon from the date of original issue specified above, or the most recent interest payment date to which interest has been paid or duly provided for, at the annual rate specified above, payable on January 1 and July 1 in each year, commencing January 1, 1990, to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month, all subject to the provisions referred to herein with respect to the redemption of the principal of this Bond before maturity. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof, the principal hereof, are payable in lawful money.of the United States of America by check or draft of First Trust National Association in St. Paul, Minnesota, as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the Bond Registrar), or its successor designated under the Resolution described herein. Additional provisions of this Bond are contained on the reverse hereof and such provisions shall for all purposes have the same effect as though fully set forth hereon. This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution until the Certificate of Authentication hereon shall have been executed by the Bond Registrar by manual signature of one of its authorized representatives. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Edina, Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed by the facsimile signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager and by a printed facsimile of the official seal of the City and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the date set forth below. Date of Authentication: (Facsimile Signature) (Facsimile Signature) City Manager Mayor (Facsimile Seal) CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This is one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned within. FIRST TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Bond Registrar By Authorized Representative (Reverse of the Bonds] This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $2,100,000 (the Bonds), all of like date and tenor except as to serial number, interest rate, redemption privilege and maturity date issued pursuant to a resolution adopted on March 20, 1989 (the Resolution) for the purpose of financing the acquisition and betterment of recreational facilities of the City, and is issued pursuant to and in full conformity with the provisions of the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota thereunto enabling, including Minnesota Laws 1961, Chapter 655, and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. This Bond is payable primarily from the net revenues of the municipal golf center, municipal recreation center and municipal liquor dispensary and pledged to the payment of the Bonds by the Resolution, but the City Council is required by law to pay maturing principal hereof and interest thereon out . of any funds in the treasury if such net revenues are insufficient therefor. The Bonds are issuable only as fully i registered bonds, in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof, of single maturities. s Bonds maturing in the years 1992 through 1998 are payable on their respective stated maturity dates without option of prior payment, but Bonds having stated maturity dates in the years 1999 through 2009 are each subject to redemption and prepayment, at the option of the City and in whole or in part and if in part, in inverse order of maturities and in $5,000 principal amounts selected by lot, within any maturity, on January 1, 1998 and on any interest payment date thereafter, at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed .plus interest accrued to the date of redemption. At least thirty days prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond, notice of the call for redemption will be published in a daily or weekly periodical, published in a Minnesota city of the first class or its metropolitan area, which circulates throughout the state and furnishes financial news as a part of its service, and will be mailed to the Bond Registrar and to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed at his address appearing in the Bond Register, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions of Bonds so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price therein specified, and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bonds or portions of Bonds shall cease to bear interest. Upon partial redemption of any Bond, a new Bond or Bonds will be delivered to the registered owner without charge, representing the remaining principal amount outstanding. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Bond Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by his attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Bond Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or his attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange, the City will cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. The City and the Bond Registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond, have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed in regular and due form, time and manner as so required; that in and by the Resolution, the City has pledged and appropriated so much of the net revenues to be derived from the operation of the municipal golf course, municipal recreation center and of the municipal liquor dispensary as shall be required to pay the principal hereof and interest thereon when due, provided that if such revenues should at any time prove insufficient for these purposes the City is required to levy ad valorem taxes upon all taxable property within its corporate limits, without limitation as to rate or amount, for the payment of the Bonds and interest thereon when due; and that the issuance of this Bond does not cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation. The following abbreviations, when 'used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to the applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM -- as tenants UNIF GIFT MIN ACT.....Custodian..... in common (Cust) (Minor) TEN ENT -- as tenants by the entireties under Uniform Gifts to JT `;'EN -- as joint tenants Minors with right of survivorship and Act ..................... not as tenants in (State) common Additional abbreviations may also be used. ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints attorney to transfer the within Bond on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER NOTICE: The signature to this OF ASSIGNEE: assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration or any change whatsoever. Signature(s) must be guaranteed by a commercial bank or trust company or by a brokerage firm having a membership in one of the major stock exchanges. 2.03 Form of Certificate. A certificate in substantially the following form shall appear on the reverse side of each Bond, following a copy of the text of the legal opinion of Bond Counsel: We certify that the above is a full, true and correct copy of the legal opinion rendered by Bond Counsel on the issue of Bonds of the City of Edina which includes the within Bond, dated as of the date of delivery of and payment for the Bonds. (Facsimile signature) (Facsimile signature) City Manager Mayor Section 3. Bond Terms, Execution and Delivery. 3.01. Maturities, Interest Rates, Denominations, Payment. The City shall forthwith issue and deliver the Bonds, which shall be denominated "General Obligation Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 1989" and shall be payable primarily from the Bond Account created in Section 4.02 hereof. The Bonds shall be issuable in the denomination of $5,000 each or any integral multiple thereof, shall mature on January 1 in the years and amounts set forth below, and Bonds maturing in such years and amounts shall bear interest from date of issue until paid or duly called for redemption at the rates per annum shown opposite such years and amounts as follows: Year Amount Rate Year Amount Rate 1992 $ 65,000 6.75% 2001 $115,000 7.10% 1993 70,000 6.75% 2001 120,000 7.15 1994 70,000 6.80 2003 130,000 7.20 1995 75,000 6.80 2004 140,000 7.15 1996 80,000 6.90 2005 .145,000" 7.25 1997 85,000 6.90 2006 160,000 7.25 1998 95,000 6.95 2007 170,000 7.30 1999 100,000 7.00 2008 180,000 7.30 2000 105,000 7.05 2009 195,000 7.30 The Bonds shall be issuable only in fully registered form. The interest thereon and, upon surrender of each Bond, the principal amount thereof, shall be payable by check or draft issued by the Registrar described herein. Each Bond shall be. dated by the Registrar as of the date of its authentication. 3.02. Dates: Interest Payment Dates. Interest on the Bonds shall be payable on January 1 and July 1 in each year, commencing January 1, 1990, to the owner of record thereof as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the immediately preceding month, whether or not such day is a business day. 3.03. Registration. The City shall appoint, and shall maintain, a bond registrar, transfer agent and paying agent (the Registrar). The effect of registration and the rights and duties of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto shall be as follows: (a) Register. The Registrar shall keep at its principal corporate trust office a bond register in which the Registrar shall provide for the registration of ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged. (b) Transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender for transfer of any Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner thereof or by an attorney duly authorized by the registered owner in writing, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the transferor. The Registrar may, however, close the books for registration of any transfer after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each interest payment date and until such interest payment date. (c) Exchange of Bonds. Whenever any Bond is surrendered by the registered owner for exchange, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as prequested by the registered owner or the owner's attorney duly authorized in writing. (d) Cancellation. All Bonds surrendered upon any transfer or exchange shall be promptly cancelled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the -City. (e) Improper or unauthorized Transfer. When any Bond is presented to the Registrar for transfer, the Registrar may refuse'to transfer the same until it is satisfied that the endorsement on such Bond or separate instrument of transfer is legally authorized: The Registrar shall incur no liability for its refusal, in good faith, to make transfers which it, in its judgment, deems improper or unauthorized. (f) Persons Deemed Owners. The City and the Registrar may treat the person in whose name any Bond is at any time registered in the bond register as the absolute owner of such Bond, whether such Bond shall be overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal of 'and interest on such Bond and for all other purposes, and all such payments so made to any such registered owner or upon the owner's order shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability of the City upon such Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. (g) Taxes, Fees and Charges. For every transfer or exchange of Bonds, the Registrar may impose a charge upon the owner thereof sufficient to reimburse the Registrar for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. (h) Mutilated, Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. In case any Bond shall become mutilated or be lost, stolen or destroyed, the Registrar shall deliver a new Bond of like amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of any such mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in substitution for any such Bond lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in connection therewith; and, in the case of a Bond lost, stolen or destroyed, upon filing with the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that such Bond was lost, stolen or destroyed, and of the ownership thereof, and upon furnishing to the Registrar of an appropriate bond'or indemnity in form, substance and amount satisfactory to it, in which both the City and the Registrar shall be named as obligees. All Bonds so surrendered to the Registrar shall be cancelled by it and evidence of such cancellation shall be given to the City. If the mutilated, lost, stolen or destroyed Bond has already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms, it shall not be necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment. (i) Authenticating Agent. The Registrar is hereby designated authenticating agent for the Bonds, within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.55, subdivision 1. 3.04. Appointment of Initial Registrar. The City hereby appoints First Trust National Association of St. Paul, Minnesota, as the initial Registrar. The Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, a contract with First Trust National Association, as Registrar. Upon merger or consolidation of the Registrar with another corporation, if the resulting corporation is a bank or trust company authorized by law to conduct such business, such corporation shall be authorized to act as successor Registrar. The City agrees to pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for the services performed. The City reserves the right to remove any Registrar upon thirty (30) days' notice and upon the appointment of a.successor Registrar, in which event the predecessor Registrar shall deliver all cash and Bonds in its possession to the successor Registrar and shall deliver the bond register to the successor Registrar. On or before each principal or interest due date, without further order of this Council, the City Finance Director shall transmit to-the Registrar from the Bond Account (Series 1989) described in Section 4.02 hereof, moneys sufficient for the paymeut.of all principal and interest then due. 3.05. Redemption. Bonds maturing in the years 1992 through 1998 shall not be subject to redemption prior to maturity, but Bonds maturing in the years 1999 through 2009 shall each be subject to redemption and prepayment, at the option of the City, in whole or in pat, and if in part, in inverse order of maturities and, within any maturity, in $5,000 principal amounts selected by the Registrar by lot, on January 1, 1988 and on any interest payment date thereafter at a price equal to the principal amount .thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued to the date of redemption. At least thirty days prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond, the City Manager shall cause notice of the call for redemption to be published in a daily or weekly periodical published in a Minnesota city of the first class or its metropolitan area, which circulates throughout the state and furnishes financial news as a part of its service, and to be mailed to the Registrar and to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond not affected by such defect or failure. The notice of redemption shall specify the redemption date, redemption price, the numbers, interest rates and CUSIP number of the Bonds to be redeemed and the place at which the Bonds are to be surrendered for payment, which is the principal office of the Registrar. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions thereof so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price therein specified and from and after such date (unless the Issuer shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bonds or portions thereof shall cease to'bear interest. In addition to the notice prescribed by the preceding paragraph, the City shall also give, or cause to be given, notice of the redemption of any Bond or Bonds or portions thereof at least 35 days before the redemption date by certified mail or telecopy to the Purchaser and all registered securities depositories then in the business of holding substantial amounts of obligations of the character of the Bonds (such depositories now being The Depository Trust Company, of Garden City, New York; Midwest Securities Trust Company, of Chicago, Illinois; Pacific Securities Depository Trust Company, of San Francisco, California; and Philadelphia Depository Trust Company, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) and one or more national information services that disseminate information regarding municipal bond redemptions; provided that any defect in or any failure to give any notice of redemption prescribed by this paragraph shall not affect the validity of the proceedings for the redemption of any Bond or portion thereof. Bonds in a denomination larger than $5,000 may be redeemed in part in any integral multiple of $5,000. The owner of any Bond redeemed in part shall receive, upon surrender of such Bond to the Registrar, one or more new Bonds in authorized denominations equal in principal amount to be unredeemed portion of the Bond so surrendered. 3.6. Preparation and Delivery. The Bonds shall be prepared under the direction of the.City Manager and shall be executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager, and shall be sealed with the official corporate seal of the City; provided that said signature and the corporate seal may be printed, engraved, or lithographed facsimiles thereof.. In case any officer whose signature, or a facsimile of whose signature, shall appear on the Bonds shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of any Bond,-such- signature or facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if such officer had remained in office until delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, no Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication on such Bond has. been duly executed by the manual signature of an authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same representative. The executed certificate of authentication on each Bond shall be conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this resolution. When the Bonds have been so executed and authenticated, they shall be delivered by the City Manager to the purchaser thereof upon payment of the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the purchase shall not be obligated to see to the application of the purchase price. Section 4. Security Provisions. 4.01. 1989 Recreational Facilities Construction Fund. There is hereby created a special fund to be designated as the "1989 Recreational Facilities Bonds Construction Fund" (the Construction Fund), to be held and administered by the City Finance Director separate and apart from all other funds of the City. The City appropriates to the Construction Fund the proceeds of the sale of the Bonds. The Construction Fund shall be used solely to defray expenses of the Improvements. Upon completion and payment of all costs of the Improvements, any balance of the proceeds of Bonds remaining in the Construction Fund shall be credited and paid to the Bond Account (Series 1989) described in Section 4.02 hereof. 4.02. Bond Account (Series 1989). So long as any of the Bonds are outstanding and any principal of or interest thereon unpaid, the City Finance Director shall maintain the Recreation Center Fund and the Operating Account therein in accordance with the provisions of the Resolution of August 2, 1965 and the Golf Course Fund and Operating Account therein in accordance with the provisions of the Resolution of November 4, 1963. In addition, the City Finance Director shall maintain in the Golf Course Fund a separate and special Bond Account (Series 1989) to be used for no other purpose other than the payment of the principal and interest on the Bonds and on such other bonds of the City as have been or may be directed to be paid therefrom. The City irrevocably appropriates to the Bond Account (Series 1989) (a) the sum of $193,403 from the net revenues derived from the operation of the Municipal Golf Center, Municipal Recreation Center and /or Municipal Liquor Dispensary, which amount shall be credited forthwith to a separate subaccount in the Bond Account (Series 1989) (the Reserve Subaccount) and which amount equals the average annual amount of principal and interest to become due on the Bonds and is required to be deposited therein pursuant to the Act (the Reserve Requirement); (b) the accrued interest and any amount in excess of $2,069,000 bid for the Bonds and received from the Purchaser upon delivery of the Bonds; (c) all such other moneys which are payable to Bond Account (Series 1989) pursuant to Section 4.03 hereof; and (d) all such other moneys as shall be received and appropriated to Bond Account (Series 1989) from time to time. Interest on money in the Reserve Subaccount shall be transferred from such Reserve Subaccount into the Bond Account (Series 1989). 4.03. Pledge of Net Revenues. The net revenues of the Municipal Golf Center, the Municipal Recreation Center and the Municipal Liquor Dispensary are hereby pledged for the payment of the principal and interest on the herein authorized Bonds, subject to the lien and charge thereon for the payment of principal and interest due, and the maintenance of a reserve, for the Outstanding Bonds. From the net revenues of the Municipal Golf Center on hand in the Operating Account of the Golf Course Fund and the net revenues of the Municipal Recreation Center on hand in the Operating Account of the Recreation Center Fund, there shall be transferred to the Bond Account (Series 1989) on each interest payment date after all transfers and credits required to be made from the Operating Account of the Golf Course Fund for payment of principal of and interest on the Outstanding Bonds, a sum equal to the interest and principal, if any, to become due on such interest payment date, less any amount on deposit therein pother than in the Reserve Subaccount) plus out of any net revenues remaining after the above payments for principal and interest into the Reserve Subaccount an amount equal to the amount necessary to cause the amount therein to equal the Reserve Requirement, if any, amounts in the Reserve Subaccount which have previously been used for the payment of any principal or interest on the Bonds, and an amount equal to any advances from the net revenues on hand in the Municipal Liquor Dispensary for the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds not previously reimbursed. If the net revenues on hand in the Operating Accounts of the Recreation Center Fund and Golf Course Fund are not sufficient on any interest payment date to transfer to the Bond Account (Series 1989) the amounts required herein for the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds and there is not then on hand in Bond Account (Series 1989) sufficient moneys for payment of principal and interest on the Bonds, the amount of the deficiency shall then be advanced from the net revenues of the Municipal Liquor Dispensary then on hand after all transfers and credits required to be made from such net revenues for payment of principal of and interest on the Outstanding Bonds. Any amounts transferred to Bond Account (Series 1989) in repayment of any amounts of the net revenues of the Municipal Liquor Dispensary deposited in Bond Account (Series. 1989) pursuant to Section 4.02 hereof which were used for the payment of principal or interest on the Bonds and any amounts transferred to Bond Account (Series 1989) in repayment of any advances from the net revenues in the Municipal Liquor Dispensary fund for the payment of principal and interest shall be transferred to the Municipal Liquor Dispensary fund as they are received. 4.04. Additional Bonds. The City reserves the right to issue additional bonds payable in whole or in part from the net revenues of the Municipal Golf Center and /or Municipal Recreation Center to finance costs of an improvement thereto, for the acquisition, betterment, operation or maintenance of other recreational facilities of the City', or for any other purpose for which such revenues may be appropriated by the Council in accordance with law; provided, however, that no additional obligations shall be issued to and made payable from the net revenues of the Municipal Golf Center or Municipal Recreation Center unless the pledge of such revenues for payment of such additional obligations is expressly made subordinate to the lien and charge thereon in favor of payment of principal and interest when due and maintenance of reserve balances required for the Outstanding Bonds, and the lien and charge thereon in favor of principal and interest when due and maintenance of reserve balances required for the Bonds. Nothing herein shall prevent the future issuance of bonds payable in whole or in part from the net revenues of the Municipal Liquor Dispensary, whether pursuant to the Act or any other applicable law, provided that the pledge of the net Municipal Liquor Dispensary revenues for the payment of such bonds is expressly made subordinate to the lien on and pledge thereof for the payment of the principal and interest and the maintenance of the agreed reserve-securing such payments on the Bonds,.unless the net Municipal Liquor Dispensary revenues received during the fiscal year immediately preceding such issuance shall have been not less than the maximum amount of principal and interest to become due in any subsequent fiscal year on all outstanding bonds then payable from such net revenues, including the additional bonds then proposed to be issued. In the event that the net revenues received in'the fiscal year preceding any such issuance have conformed to the .. condition prescribed in the preceding sentence, the additional bonds so issued may be payable from the net Municipal Liquor Dispensary revenues on a parity with the Bonds as to both principal and interest, without preference or priority of one bond over any other, except that if net Municipal Liquor Dispensary revenues on hand at any time are not sufficient, with other funds then on hand for the payment of all such bonds, to pay in full the principal and interest then due, the balance of net Municipal Liquor Dispensary revenues then available shall be allocated to the Bond Account (Series 1989) and-to the respective accounts established for the payment of other bonds, in proportion to the principal amount of bonds of each issue which are then outstanding. 4.05. Tax Levu. Pursuant to the Act, the full faith, credit and taxing powers of the City are also irrevocably pledged for the prompt and full payment of the principal and interest on the Bonds, as such principal and interests respectively become due. The appropriations and covenants contained in this resolution are deemed to be sufficient to assure the payment of such principal and interest. Accordingly, no tax is presently levied for this purpose. If at any time it appears that the net revenues of the Municipal Golf Center, Municipal Recreation Center and Municipal Liquor Dispensary which are pledged for the payment of the Bonds and the net revenues of the Municipal Liquor Dispensary and /or Municipal Golf Center deposited in Bond Account (Series 1989) pursuant to Section 4.02 hereof shall not be sufficient to pay the principal and interest on the Bonds the City covenants and agrees that it will levy a tax sufficient, with the net Municipal Liquor Dispensary and /or Municipal Golf Center revenues, net Municipal Recreation Center revenues and net Golf Center revenues then on hand in Bond Account (Series 1989), to pay all such principal and interest, which tax shall be levied upon all taxable property within the corporate limits of the City, without limitation as to rate or amount. Section 5. Defeasance. When all of the Bonds have been discharged as provided in this section, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this resolution to the holders of the Bonds shall cease. The City may discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds which are due on any date by depositing with the paying agent on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full; or, if any Bond should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged by depositing with the paying agent a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued to the date of such deposit. The City may also at any time discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds, subject to the provisions of law now or hereafter authorizing and regulating such action, by depositing irrevocably in escrow, with a bank qualified by law as an escrow agent for this purpose, cash or securities which are general obligations of the United States or securities of United States agencies which are authorized by law to be so deposited, bearing interest payable at such time and at such rates and maturing on such dates as shall be required, without reinvestment, to pay all principal and interest to become due thereon to maturity. Section 6. County Auditor Registration. Certification of Proceedings. Investment of Money. Arbitrage and Official Statement. 6.01. County Auditor Registration. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the County Auditor of Hennepin County, together with such other information as he shall require, and to obtain from the County Auditor a certificate that the Bonds have been entered on his bond register and that the tag required for the payment thereof has been levied and filed as required by law. 6.02. Certification of Proceedings. The officers of the City and the County Auditor of Hennepin County are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser, and to Dorsey & Whitney, Bond Counsel, certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City, and such other affidavits, certificates and information as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the Bonds as the same appear from the books and records under their custody and control or as otherwise known to them, and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the City as to the facts recited therein. 6.03. Covenant. The City covenants and agrees with the holders from time to time of the Bonds that it will not take or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents any action which would cause the interest on the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder (the Regulations), as such are enacted or promulgated and in effect on the date of issue of the Bonds, and covenants to take any and all actions within its powers to ensure that the interest on the Bonds will not become subject to taxation under the Code and the Regulations. 6.04. Arbitrage. The Mayor and City Manager, being the officers of the City charged with the responsibility for issuing the Bonds pursuant to this resolution, are authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the Purchaser thereof a certificate in accordance with the provisions of Section 148 of the Code, and Treasury Regulations, Section 1.103 -13, 1.103 -14 and 1.103.15, stating the facts, estimates and circumstances in existence on the date of issue and delivery of the Bonds which make it reasonable to expect that the proceeds of the Bonds will not be used in a manner that would cause the Bonds to be arbitrage bonds within the meaning of said Code and Regulations. 6.05. Compliance With Rebate Requirement. The City will not use the proceeds of the Bonds in such a manner as to cause the Bonds to be "Arbitrage bonds" within the meaning of Section 148 of the Code and applicable Regulations; to this end, the City shall: (i) maintain records identifying all "gross proceeds" (as defined in Section 148(f)(6)(B) of the Code) attributable to the Bonds, the yield at which such gross proceeds are invested, any arbitrage profit derived therefrom (earnings in excess of the yield on the Bonds) and any earnings derived from the investment of such arbitrage profit: (ii) make, or cause to be made as of the anniversary date of the issuance of the Bonds, the annual determinations of the amount, if any, of excess arbitrage required to be paid to the United States by the City (the Rebate Amount); (iii) pay, or cause to be paid, to the United States at least once every five Bond Years the amount, if any, which is required to be paid to the United States, including the last installment which shall be made no later than 60 days after the day on which the Bonds are paid in full; and (iv) retain all records of the annual determination of the foregoing amounts until six (6) years after the Bonds have been fully paid. In order to comply with the foregoing requirements, the City Finance Director shall determine the Rebate Amount within 30 days of each anniversary date of the issuance of the Bonds and upon payment in full of the Bonds and shall deposit such Rebate Amount in a separate account and shall separately account for the earnings from the investment of the Rebate Amount. In the event the foregoing requirements conflict with the requirements of the Regulations promulgated under Section 184(f) of the Code, the requirements of such Regulations shall be controlling. 6.06. Official Statement. The Official Statement relating to the Bonds, dated March 6, 1989, prepared and distributed on behalf of the City by Public Financial Systems, Inc., is hereby approved. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to execute such certificates as may be appropriate concerning the accuracy, completeness and sufficiency of the Official Statement. Adopted by the City Council on March 20, 1989. ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk The motion for adoption of the resolution was duly seconded by Member Rice, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards and the following voted against the same: None whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, and was signed by the Mayor, which was attested by the City Clerk. RESOLUTION ADOPTED RELATING TO $1,760,000 G.O. IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1989: AWARDING SALE, FIXING FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR EXECUTION AND DELIVERY THEREOF AND SECURITY THEREFOR. The City Clerk presented affidavits showing publication in a legal newspaper having general circulation in the City, and in a daily or weekly periodical published in a Minnesota city of the first class, which circulates throughout the state and furnishes financial news as a part of its service, of the notice of sale of $1,760,000 General Obligation Improvement. Bonds, Series 1989 of the City, bids for which are to be- considered at this meeting`as provided by the resolution of the City Council adopted February 21, 1989.' The affidavits were examined and approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. It was reported that three sealed bids for the purchase of said Bonds had been received from the following institutions at or before the time stated in the notice, and the bids were then publicly read and considered, and were all found to conform to the.notice of sale and the terms and conditions of sale and to be accompanied by the required security, and the purchase price, interest rates and net interest cost under the terms of each bid were found to be as follows: Name of Bidder FIRST BANK N.A. MINNEAPOLIS PAIN BOSWORTH INCORPORATED NORWEST INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC. PIPER JAFFRAY & HOPWOOD, INC. Allison - Williams Company American National Bank St. Paul Cronin & Co., Inc. Miller Securities, Inc. Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co., Inc. Craig Hallum Doughterty, Dawkins, Strand Total Interest Interest Bid for Cost -Net Rates Principal Average Rate 6.75- 1992/93 $1,741,520.00 $909,535.00 6.80- 1994/95 7.0882% 6.90- 1996 -97 6.95 -1998 7.00 -1999 7.05 -2000 7.10 -2001 & Host, Inc. John G. Kinnard Marquette Bank Minneapolis, N.A. M.H. Novick & Company, Inc. Park Investment Corp. Summit Investment Corp. Juran & Moody, Inc. McClees Investment Services PRUDENTIAL -BACHE CAPITAL 7.00- 1992/95 $1,740,006.40 $926,040.27 FUNDING 7.05- 1996/99 7.2768% SHEARSON LEHMAN HUTTON INC. 7.10 -2000 DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS INC. 7.15 -2001 CLAYTON BROWN & ASSOCIATES, 7.00- 1992/96 $1,741,316.75 $934,032.70 INC. 7.10- 1997/98 7.2791% 7.20 -1999 7.25 -2000 7.30 -2001 Member Smith then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO $1,760,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1989; AWARDING THE SALE, FIXING THE FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY THEREOF AND SECURITY THEREFOR BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), as follows: Section 1. Recitals. Authorization and Sale of Bonds. 1.01. Authorization. This Council has heretofore ordered various improvements for the Centennial Lakes Redevelopment Project in the City (the Improvements), to be constructed under and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 475 and 429. This Council hereby determines to issue and sell $1,760,000 principal amount of General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1989, of the City (the Bonds) to defray the expense incurred and estimated to be incurred by the City in making the improvements, including every item of cost of the kinds authorized in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.65, and $20,000 representing interest as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.56. 1.02. Sale of Bonds. Notice of the sale of the Bonds was duly published as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60. Pursuant to the Notice of Bond Sale and the Terms and Conditions of Sale, three sealed bids for the purchase of the Bonds were received at or before the time specified for receipt of bids. The bids have been opened and publicly read and considered, and the purchase price, interest rates and net interest cost under the terms of each bid have been determined. The most favorable proposal received is that of First Bank National Association of Minneapolis, Minnesota (the Purchaser), to purchase the Bonds at a price of $1,741.520, the Bonds to bear interest at the rates set forth in Section 3.01. The proposal is hereby accepted, and the Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute a contract on the part of the City for the sale of the Bonds with the Purchaser. The good faith checks of the unsuccessful bidders shall be returned forthwith. 1.03. Performance of Requirements. All acts, conditions and things which are required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the valid issuance of the Bonds having been done, existing, having happened and having been performed, it is now necessary for this Council to establish the form and terms of the Bonds, to provide security therefor and to issue the Bonds forthwith. 1.04. Maturities. This Council finds and determines that the maturities of the Bonds, as set forth in Section 3.01 hereof, are warranted by the anticipated collection of the special assessments levied and to be levied for the cost of the improvements. Section 1. Form of Bonds. Section 2.01. Bond Form. The Bonds shall be prepared. in substantially the following form: (Face of the Bonds] UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BOND SERIES 1989 Date of Interest Rate Maturity Original Issue CUSIP April 1, 1989 SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS REGISTERED OWNER: PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: DOLLARS THE CITY OF EDINA, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the City), acknowledges itself to be indebted and, for value received, hereby promises to pay to the registered owner named above, or registered assigns, the principal amount specified above, on the maturity date specified above, with interest thereon from the date of original issue specified above, or from the most recent interest payment date to which interest has been paid or duly provided for, at the annual rate specified above. Interest hereon is payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing August 1, 1989, to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month, all subject to the provisions referred to herein with respect to the redemption of the principal of this Bond before maturity. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof at the principal office of the Bond Registrar hereinafter designated, the principal hereof, are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft of First Trust National Association, in St. Paul, Minnesota, as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the Bond Registrar), or its successor designated under the Resolution described herein.. Additional provisions of this Bond are contained on the reverse hereof and such provisions shall for all purposes have the same effect as though fully set forth hereon. This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution until the Certificate of Authentication hereon shall have been executed by the Bond Registrar by the manual signature of one of its authorized representatives. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed by the facsimile signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager and by a printed facsimile of the official seal of the City and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the date set forth below. (Facsimile Signature) (Facsimile Signature) City Manager Mayor t, 1. (Facsimile Seal) Date of Authentication: CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This is one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned within. FIRST TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Bond Registrar . By Authorized Representative (Reverse of the Bonds] This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $1,760,000 (the Bonds), issued pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on March 20, 1989 (the Resolution), for the purpose of financing the costs of improvements in the City (the Improvements), and is issued pursuant to and in full conformity with the provisions of the the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota thereunto enabling, including Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 429 and 475. The Bonds are payable primarily from the 1989 Improvement Bond Fund (the Fund) of the City. In addition, for the full and prompt payment of the principal and interest on the Bonds as the same become due, the full faith, credit and taxing power of the City have been and are hereby irrevocably pledged. The Bonds are issuable only as fully registered bonds in denominations of $5,000 or any multiple thereof, of single maturities. Bonds maturing in the years 1992 through 1995 are payable on their respective stated maturity dates without option of prior payment, but Bonds having stated maturity dates in 1996 and later years are each subject to redemption and prepayment, at the option of the City and in whole or in part, and if in part, in inverse order of maturities and in $5,000 principal amounts selected by lot within a maturity, on February 1, 1995 and on any interest payment date thereafter, at a price equal-to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. At least thirty days.prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond, notice of the call for redemption will be published in a daily or weekly periodical, published in a Minnesota city of the first class or its metropolitan area, which circulates throughout the state and furnishes financial news as a part of its service, and will be mailed to the Bond Registrar and to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed at his address appearing in the Bond Register, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions of Bonds so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price therein specified, and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bonds or portions of Bonds shall cease to bear interest. Upon partial redemption of any Bond, a new Bond or Bonds will be delivered to the registered owner without charge, representing the remaining principal amount outstanding. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Bond Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by his attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Bond Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or his attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange, the City will cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same Z aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for -any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. The City and the Bond Registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond in order to make this Bond a valid and binding general obligation of the City according to its terms, have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed in regular and due form as so required; that prior to the issuance hereof the City has levied or agreed to levy special assessments on property specially benefited by the Improvements and ad valorem taxes on all taxable property in the City, collectible in the years and amounts required to produce sums not less than 5% in excess of the principal of and interest on the Bonds as such principal and interest respectively become due, and has appropriated the same to the Fund in the manner specified in Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.091, Subdivision 4; that, to take care of any accumulated or anticipated deficiency in the Fund, additional ad valorem taxes are required by law to be levied upon all taxable property in the City without limitation as to rate or amount; and that the issuance of this Bond does not cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation. The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM -- as tenants UNIF GIFT MIN ACT..... Custodian..... in common (Cust) (Minor) TEN ENT -- as tenants by the entireties JT TEN -- as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in (State) common under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act...................... Additional abbreviations may also be used. ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints attorney to transfer the within Bond on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER NOTICE: The signature(s) to IDENTIFYING NUMBER this assignment must correspond OF ASSIGNEE: with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration, enlargement or any change whatsoever. Signature(s) must be guaranteed by a com- mercial bank or trust company or by a brokerage firm having a membership in one of the major stock exchanges. 2.02. Form of Certificate. A certificate in substantially the following form shall appear on the reverse side of each Bond, following a copy of the text of the legal opinion of Bond Counsel: We certify that the above is a full, true and correct copy of the legal opinion rendered by Bond Counsel on the issue of Bonds of the City of Edina, Minnesota, which includes the within Bond, dated as of the date of delivery of and payment for the Bonds. (Facsimile signature) (Facsimile signature) City Manager Mayor Section 3. Bond Terms, Execution and Delivery. 3.01. Maturities, Interest Rates, Denominations, Payment. Dating of Bonds. The City shall forthwith issue and deliver the Bonds, which shall be denominated "General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1989" and shall be payable primarily from the 1989 General Obligation Improvement Bond Fund of the City created in Section 4.02. The Bonds shall be dated initially as of April 1, 1989, shall be issuable in the denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof, shall mature on February 1 in the years and amounts set forth below, and Bonds maturing in such years and amounts shall bear interest from date of issue until paid or duly called for redemption at the rates per annum set forth opposite such years and amounts as follows: Year Amount Rate Year Amount Rate 1992 $180,000 6.75% 1997 $175,000 6.90% 1993 1809000 6.75 1998 175,000 6.95 1994 180,000 6.80 1999 175,000 7.00 1995 1759000 6.80 2000 175,000 7.05 1996 1759000 6.90 2001 170,000 7.10 The Bonds shall be issuable only in fully registered form. The interest thereon and, upon surrender of a Bond at the principal office of the Registrar described herein, the principal amount thereof, shall be payable by check or draft issued by the Registrar described herein. Each Bond shall be dated as of the date of authentication. 3.02. Interest Payment Dates. Interest on the Bonds shall be payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing August 1, 1989, to the owner of record thereof as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the immediately preceding month, whether or not such day is a business day. 3.03. Registration. The City shall appoint, and shall maintain, a bond registrar, transfer agent and paying agent (the Registrar). The effect of registration and the rights and duties of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto shall be as follows: (a) Register. The Registrar shall keep at its principal corporate trust office a bond register in which the Registrar shall provide for the registration of ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged. (b) Transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender to the Registrar for transfer of any Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner thereof or by an attorney duly authorized by the registered owner in writing, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the transferor. The Registrar may, however, close the books for registration of any transfer after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each interest payment date and until such interest payment date. (c) Exchange of Bonds. Whenever any Bond is surrendered by the registered owner for exchange, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount, interest rate and maturity, as - requested by the registered owner or the owner's attorney duly authorized in writing. (d) Cancellation. All Bonds surrendered upon any transfer or exchange shall be promptly cancelled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. (e) Improper or unauthorized Transfer. When any Bond is presented to the Registrar for transfer, the Registrar may refuse to transfer the same until it is satisfied that the endorsement on such Bond or separate instrument of transfer is valid and genuine and that the requested transfer is legally authorized. The Registrar shall incur no liability for its refusal, in good faith, to make transfers which it, in its judgment, deems improper or unauthorized. (f) Persons Deemed Owners. The City and the Registrar may treat the person in whose name any Bond is at any time registered in the bond register as the absolute owner of such Bond, whether such Bond shall be overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal of and interest on such Bond and for all other purposes, and all such payments so made to any such registered owner or upon the owner's order shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability of the City upon such Bond to'the extent of the sum or sums so paid. (g) Taxes. Fees and Charges. For every transfer or exchange of Bonds (except for an exchange upon a partial redemption of a Bond), the Registrar may impose a charge upon the owner thereof sufficient to reimburse the Registrar for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. (h) Mutilated. Lost. Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. In case any Bond shall become mutilated or be lost, stolen or destroyed, the Registrar shall deliver a new Bond of like amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of any such mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in substitution for any such Bond lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in connection therewith; and, in the case of a Bond lost, stolen or destroyed, upon receipt by the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that such Bond was lost, stolen or destroyed, and of the ownership thereof, and upon receipt by the Registrar of an appropriate bond or indemnity in form, substance and amount satisfactory to it, in which both the City and the Registrar shall be named as obligees. All Bonds so surrendered to the Registrar shall be cancelled by it and evidence of such cancellation shall be given to the City. If the mutilated, lost, stolen or destroyed Bond has already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms, it shall not be necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment. (i) Authenticating Agent. The Registrar is hereby designated authenticating agent for the Bonds, within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.55, Subdivision 1. 3.04. Appointment of Initial Registrar. The City hereby appoints First Trust National Association, of St. Paul, Minnesota, as the initial Registrar. The Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, a contract with First Trust National Association, as Registrar. upon merger or consolidation of the Registrar with another corporation, if the resulting corporation is a bank or trust company authorized by law to conduct such business, such corporation shall be authorized to act as successor Registrar. The City agrees to pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for the services performed. The City reserves the right to remove any Registrar upon thirty (30) days' notice and upon the appointment of a successor Registrar, in which event the predecessor Registrar shall deliver all cash and Bonds in its possession to the successor Registrar and shall deliver the bond register to the successor Registrar. On or before each principal-or interest due date, without further order of this Council, the City Finance Director shall transmit to the Registrar, from the 1989 Improvement Bond Fund, moneys sufficient for the payment of all principal and interest then due. 3.05. Redemption. Bonds maturing in the years 1992 through 1995 are payable on their respective stated maturity dates without option of prior payment, but Bonds maturing in 1996 and later years are each subject to redemption, at the option of the City and in whole or in part, and if in part, in inverse order of maturities and, within any maturity, in $5,000 principal amounts selected by the Registrar by lot, on February 1, 1995 and on any interest payment date thereafter, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. At least thirty days prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond, the City shall cause notice of the call for redemption to be published in a daily or weekly periodical published in a Minnesota city of the first class or its metropolitan area, which circulates throughout the state and furnishes financial news as a part of its service, and to be mailed to the Registrar and to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond not affected by such defect or failure. The notice of redemption shall specify the redemption date, redemption price, the numbers, interest rates and CUSIP numbers of the Bonds to be redeemed and the place at which the Bonds are to be surrendered for payment, which is the principal office'of the Registrar. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions thereof so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price therein specified and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bonds or portions thereof shall cease to bear interest. In addition to the notice prescribed by the preceding paragraph, the City shall also give, or cause to be given, notice of the redemption of any Bond or Bonds or portions thereof at least 35 days before the redemption date by certified mail or telecopy to the Purchaser and all registered securities depositories then. in the business of holding substantial amounts of obligations of the character of the Bonds (such depositories now being The Depository Trust Company, of Garden City, New York; Midwest Securities Trust Company, of Chicago, Illinois; Pacific Securities Depository Trust Company, of San Francisco,.California; and Philadelphia Depository Trust Company, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) and one or more national information services that disseminate information regarding municipal bond redemptions; provided that any defect in or any failure to give any notice of redemption prescribed by this paragraph shall not affect the validity of the proceedings for the redemption of any Bond or portion thereof. Bonds in a denomination larger than $5,000 may be redeemed in part in any integral multiple of $5,000. The owner of any Bond redeemed in part shall receive, upon surrender of such Bond to the Registrar, one or more new Bonds in authorized denominations equal in principal amount to the unredeemed portion of the Bond so surrendered. 3.06. Preparation and Delivery. The Bonds shall be prepared under the direction of the City Manager and shall be executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager and shall be sealed with the official corporate seal of the City; provided that said signatures and the corporate seal may be printed, engraved, or lithographed facsimiles thereof. In case any officer whose signature, or a facsimile of whose signature, shall appear on the Bonds shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of any Bond, such signature or facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if such officer had remained in office until delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, no Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this Resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication of such Bond has been duly executed by the manual signature of an authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same representative. The executed certificate of authentication on each Bond shall be conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this Resolution. When the Bonds have n i I been so executed and authenticated, they shall be delivered by the City Manager to the Purchaser upon payment of-the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the Purchaser shall not be obligated to see to the application of the purchase price. Section 4. Security Provisions. 4.01. 1989 Improvement Construction Fund. There is hereby created a special bookkeeping fund to be designated as the "1989 Improvement Construction Fund" (hereinafter referred to as the Construction Fund), to be held and administered by the City Finance Director separate and apart from all other funds of the City. The City appropriates to the Construction Fund (a) the proceeds of the sale of the Bonds, and (b) all collections of special assessments levied for the Improvements until completion and payment of all costs of the Improvements. The Construction Fund shall be used solely to defray.expenses of the Improvements, including but not limited to the transfer to the Bond Fund, created in Section 4.02 hereof, of amounts sufficient for the payment of interest and principal, if any, due upon the Bonds prior to the completion and payment of all costs of the Improvements and the payment of the expenses incurred by the City in connection with the issuance of the Bonds. Upon completion and payment of all costs of the Improvements, any balance of the proceeds of Bonds remaining in the Construction Fund may be used to pay the cost, in whole or in part, of any other improvements instituted pursuant to the Act, as directed by the City Council, but any balance of such proceeds not so used shall be credited and paid to the Bond Fund. 4.02. 1989 Improvement Bond Fund. So long as any of the Bonds are outstanding and any principal of or interest thereon unpaid, the City Finance Director shall maintain a separate and special bookkeeping fund designated "1989 Improvement Bond Fund" (hereinafter referred to as the Bond Fund) to be used for no purpose other than the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds and on such other improvement bonds of the City as have been or may be directed to be paid therefrom. The City irrevocably appropriates to the Bond Fund (a) the collections of special assessments and other funds to be credited and paid thereto in accordance with the provisions of Section 4.01, (b) any taxes levied in accordance with this resolution, and (c) all such other moneys as shall be :' received and appropriated to the Bond Fund from time to time. If the balance in the Bond Fund is at any time insufficient to pay all interest and principal then due on all bonds payable therefrom, the payment shall be made from any find of the City which is available for that purpose, subject to reimbursement from the Bond Fund when the balance therein is sufficient, and the Council covenants and agrees that it will each year levy a sufficient amount to take care of any accumulated or anticipated deficiency, which levy is not subject to any constitutional or statutory tax limitation. 4.03. Additional Bonds. The City reserves the right to issue additional bonds payable from the Bond Fund as may be required to finance costs of the Improvements not financed hereby; provided that the City Council shall, prior to the delivery of such additional bonds, levy or agree to levy by resolution sufficient additional special assessments and ad valorem taxes, if any, which, together with other moneys or revenues pledged for the payment of said additional obligations, will produce revenues at least five percent (5 %) in excess of the amount needed to pay when due the principal and interest on all bonds payable from the Bond Fund. The additional special assessments, ad valorem taxes and moneys or revenues so pledged, levied or agreed to be levied shall be irrevocably appropriated to the Bond Fund in the manner provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61. 4.04. Levy of Special Assessments. The City hereby covenants and agrees that for payment of the cost of the Improvement it will.do and perform all acts and things necessary for the full and valid levy of special assessments against all assessable lots, tracts and parcels of land benefited thereby and located within the area proposed to be assessed therefore, based upon the benefits received by each such lot, tract or parcel, in an aggregate principal amount not less than one hundred percent (100 %) of the cost of the Improvement. In the event that any such assessment shall be at any time held invalid with respect to any r. lot, piece or parcel of land, due to any error, defect or irregularity in any action or proceeding taken or to be taken by the City or this Council or any of the City's officers or employees, either in the making of such assessment or in the performance of any condition precedent.thereto, the City and this Council hereby covenant and agree that they will forthwith do all such further acts and take all such further proceedings as may be required by law to make such assessments a valid and binding lien upon such property. The Council presently estimated that the special assessments shall be in the principal amount of $1,760,000 payable in not more than 10 installments, the first installment to be collectible with taxes during the year 1991, and that deferred installments shall bear interest at the rate of not less than nine percent (9 %) per annum from the date of the resolution levying said assessment until December 31 of the year in which the installment is payable. 4.05. Full Faith and Credit Pledged. The full faith and credit of the City are irrevocably pledged for the prompt and full payment of the principal of and the interest on the Bonds, and the Bonds shall be payable from the Bond Fund in accordance with the provisions and covenants contained in this resolution. It is estimated that the special assessments levied and to be levied for the payment of the Improvement will be collected in amounts not less than five percent (5 %) in excess of the annual principal and interest requirements.of the Bonds. If the money on hand in the Bond Fund should at any time be insufficient for the payment of principal and interest then due, this City shall pay the principal and interest out of any fund of the City, and such other fund or funds shall be reimbursed therefor when sufficient money is available to the Bond Fund. If on October 1 in any year the sum of the balance in the Bond Fund plus the amount of taxes and special assessments theretofore levied for the Improvements and collectible through the end of the following calendar year is not sufficient to pay when due all principal and interest becoming due on all Bonds payable therefrom in said following calendar year, or the Bond Fund has incurred a deficiency in the manner provided in this Section 4.05, a direct, irrepealable, ad valorem tax shall be levied on all taxable property within the corporate limits of the City for the purpose of restoring such accumulated or anticipated deficiency in accordance with the provisions of this resolution. Section 5. Defeasance. When any Bond has been discharged as provided in this Section 5, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this resolution to the holders of such Bonds shall cease, and such Bonds shall no longer be deemed outstanding under this Resolution. The City may discharge its obligations with respect to any Bond which is due on any date by irrevocably depositing with the Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full; or, if any Bond should not be paid when due, the City may nevertheless discharge its obligations with respect thereto by depositing with the Registrar a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued to the date of such deposit. The City may also discharge its obligations with respect to any prepayable Bond called for redemption on any date when it is prepayable according to their terms, by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full; provided that notice of the redemption thereof has been duly given as provided in Section 3.05. The City may also at any time discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds, subject to the provisions of law now or hereafter authorizing and regulating such action, by depositing irrevocably in escrow, with a bank qualified by law as an escrow agent for this-purpose, cash or securities which are authorized by law to be so• deposited, bearing interest payable at such times and at such rates and maturing on such dates as shall be required, without reinvestment, to pay all principal and interest to become due thereon to maturity or, if notice of redemption as herein required has been duly provided for, to such earlier redemption date. Section 6. County Auditor Registration. Certification of Proceedings, Investment of Money. Arbitrage, Official Statement and Fees. 6.01. County Auditor Registration. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Auditor of Hennepin County, together with such other information as the County Auditor shall 4 � require, and to obtain from said County Auditor a certificate that the Bonds have been entered on his bond register as required by law. 6.02. Certification of Proceedings. The officers of the City and the County Auditor of Hennepin County are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser and to Dorsey & Whitney, Bond Counsel to the City, certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City, and such other affidavits, certificates and information as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability.of the Bonds as the same appear from the books and records under their custody and control or as otherwise known to them, and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representation of the City as to the facts recited therein. 6.03. Tax Covenant. The City covenants and agrees with the owners from time to time of the Bonds that it will not take or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents any action which would cause the interest on the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder (the Regulations), and covenants to take any and all actions within its powers to ensure that the interest on the Bonds will not become subject to taxation under such Code and Regulations. The City will cause to be filed with the Secretary of Treasury an information reporting statement in the form and at the time prescribed by the Code. 6.04. Investment of Money on Deposit in the Bond Fund. After February 1, 1995 the City Finance Director shall ascertain monthly the amount on deposit in the Bond Fund. If after February 1, 1995 the amount on deposit therein ever exceeds by more than $88,000 the aggregate amount of principal and interest due. and payable from the Bond Fund within the next succeeding 12 months, such excess shall be used to prepay and redeem Bonds or be invested at a yield less than or equal to the yield on the Bonds, based upon their amounts, maturities and interest rates on their date of issue, computed by the actuarial method. If any additional bonds are ever issued and made payable from the Bond Fund, the dollar amount in the preceding sentence shall be changed to equal 5 percent of the aggregate' original principal amount of the bonds of all series, including the Bonds, of which any bonds are then outstanding and payable therefrom. The City reserves the right to amend the provisions of this Section at any time, whether prior to or after the delivery of the Bonds, if and to the extent that this Council determines that the provisions of this Section are not necessary in order to ensure that the Bonds are not "arbitrage bonds" within the meaning of Section 148 of the Code and Regulations. 6.05. Arbitrage Certification. The Mayor and the City Manager, being the officers of the City charged with the responsibility for issuing the Bonds pursuant to this resolution, are authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the Purchaser a certification in accordance with the provisions of Section 148 of the Code, and Sections 1.103 -13, 1.103 -14 and 1.103 -15 of the Regulations, stating the facts, estimates and circumstances in existence on the date of issue and delivery of the Bonds which make it reasonable to expect that the proceeds of the Bonds will not be used in a manner that would cause the Bonds to be arbitrage bonds within the meaning of the Code and Regulations. 6.06 Compliance With Rebate Requirement. The City will not use the proceeds of the Bonds in such a manner as to cause the Bonds to be "arbitrage bonds" within the meaning of Section 148 of the Code and applicable Regulations; to this end, the City shall: (i) maintain records identifying all "gross proceeds" (as defined in Section 148(f)(6)(B) of the Code) attributable to the Bonds, the yield at which such gross proceeds are invested, any arbitrage profit derived therefrom (earnings in excess of the yield on the Bonds) and any earnings derived from the investment of such arbitrage profit; (ii) make, or cause to be made as of the anniversary date of the issuance of the Bonds, the annual determinations of the amount, if any, of excess arbitrage required to be paid to the United States by the City (the Rebate Amount); pay, or cause to be paid, to the United States at least once every five Bond'Years the amount, if any, which is required to be paid to the United States, including the last installment which shall be made no later than 60 days after the day on which the Bonds are paid in full; and (iv) retain all records of the annual determination of the foregoing amounts until six (6) years after the Bonds have been fully paid. In order to comply with the foregoing requirements, the City Finance Director shall determine the Rebate Amount within 30 days of each anniversary date of the issuance of the Bonds and upon payment in full of the Bonds and.shall deposit such Rebate Amount in a separate account and shall separately account for the earnings from the investment of the Rebate Amount. In the event the foregoing requirements conflict with the requirements of the Regulations promulgated under Section 148(f) of the Code, the requirements of such Regulations shall be controlling. 6.07. Official Statement. The Official Statement relating to the Bonds, dated March 6, 1989, prepared and distributed on behalf of the City by Public Financial Systems, Inc., is hereby approved. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to execute such certificates as may be appropriate concerning the accuracy, completeness and sufficiency of the Official Statement. Adopted by the City Council on March 20, 1989. ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the forgoing Rice, and upon vote being taken thereon,. the Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards and the following voted against the same: None Mayor resolution was duly seconded by Member following voted in favor thereof: _,reupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, and was signed by the Mayor which signature was attested by the City Clerk. CLAIMS PAID Member Kelly questioned the claim presented by Thomsen - Nybeck in the amounts of $10,812.12 and $11,216.37 for legal services. Manager Rosland explained that majority of the charges on'the bill for $10,812.12 were in connection with the prosecution of the Bonynge case and that the other invoice was for routine prosecution services. Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly for approval of payment of claims as per pre -list dated 03/20/89: General Fund $265,251.78, Art Center $5,524.02, Capital Fund $1,677.25, Golf Course Fund $13,971.34, Recreation Center, Fund $72,036.00, Gun Range Fund $453.86, Edinborough Park $11,339.13, Utility Fund $17,399.46, Storm Sewer Utility $1,989.50, Liquor Dispensary Fund $69,928.15, Construction Fund $10,959.50, Total $470,529.99; and for confirmation of payment of the following claims dated 02/28/89: General Fund $279,189.98, Art Center $1,338.62, Swimming.Pool Fund $64.71, Golf Course Fund $12,829.32, Recreation Center Fund $14,314.90, Gun Range Fund $167.25, Edinborough Park $14,024.72, Utility Fund $24,230.51, Liquor Dispensary Fund $195,346.34, Total $541,506.35. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the meeting adjourned at 9:50 p.m. City Clerk MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL APRIL 3, 1989 The meeting was called to order by Mayor Richards at 7:00 p.m. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Richards. EDINA HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS' BASKETBALL TEAM AND BOYS' SWIMMING TEAM COMMENDED Mayor Richards presented resolutions of commendation for the Edina High School Girls' Basketball Team and Boys' Swimming Team for recent accomplishments in state meets. The resolutions were unanimously adopted. RESOLUTION ADOPTED FOR WEEK OF THE YOUNG CHILD Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Paulus for adoption of the following resolution: THE WEEK OF THE YOUNG CHILD RESOLUTION WHEREAS we recognize the critical important of the care and healthy development of young children from infancy through their early years in school; and WHEREAS young children have a birthright to love, respect, security, health and protection; and WHEREAS those who care for and teach young children -- parents, child care providers and early childhood education teachers -- deserve recognition and support from our community. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Frederick S. Richards, Mayor of the City of Edina, proclaim the week of April 2 -8, 1989 to be: THE WEEK OF THE YOUNG CHILD and urge all citizens to renew their efforts to support young children, the programs that serve them and the dedicated individuals who care for and teach them ADOPTED this 3rd day of April, 1989.. Motion was adopted unanimously. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 9. 1989 APPROVED Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of January 9, 1989. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED: SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT S -46 AUTHORIZED Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Pursuant to due notice given, a public hearing was conducted and action taken as hereinafter set forth: A. CONSTRUCTION OF SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. P -S -46 IN THE FOLLOWING; Xerxes Avenue from West 60th Street to West 62nd Street (West Side) Engineer Hoffman stated that the proposed sidewalk improvement has been petitioned for by residents on Xerxes Avenue from West 60th Street to West 62nd Street to provide better pedestrian access to the Southdale area and for safety considerations. He explained that Xerxes Avenue is a county road and Hennepin County does not construct sidewalks unless funded by the City.. Accordingly, the project is proposed to be funded from municipal gas tax funds as this would be an eligible project, with no assessment against abutting property. Cost of the project is estimated at $24,378.48. Because the roadway is not wide enough according to state standards, a variance may be required if this problem cannot be worked out administratively. F The sidewalk is proposed to be five feet in width and constructed of concrete. The alignment may be varied to protect existing property features to the greatest extent possible. Under present City policy, maintenance (snow removal) of the sidewalk will be the responsibility of the City. Staff would recommend approval of the project. No objections being heard, Member Rice introduced the following resolutions and moved adoption: RESOLUTION ORDERING SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. 5 -46 BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that this Council heretofore caused notice of hearing to be duly mailed to owners of each parcel within the affected area of the following proposed improvement: CONSTRUCTION OF SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT Xerxes Avenue from hest 60th Street to hest 62nd Street (Nest Side) and at the hearing held at the time and place specified in said notice, the Council has'duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the construction of said improvement, including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights for construction and maintenance of such improvement; that said improvement is hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -46, cost of which shall be paid from Municipal State Aid Funds. RESOLUTION CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, it has been deemed advisable and necessary for the City of Edina to participate in the cost of a construction project located on C.S.A.H. No. 31 (Xerxes Avenue) within the limits of said municipality, and WHEREAS, said construction project has been approved by the Commissioner of Transportation and identified in his records as S.A.P. No. 120 - 020 -29; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that we do hereby appropriate from our Municipal State Aid Street Funds the sum of $25,000 to apply toward the construction of said project and request the Commissioner of Transportation to approve this authorization. Motion for adoption of the resolutions was seconded by.Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolutions adopted. *PUBLIC HEARING ON BLAKE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS CONTINUED TO 4117189 Motion was made, by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly to continue the public hearing on the Blake Road improvements to the Council Meeting of April 17, 1989. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED: CDBG PROGRAM BUDGET FOR YEAR XV APPROVED Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Pursuant to due notice having been given, a public hearing was conducted on the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program for Year XV. Planner Larsen presented the proposed budget as follows: Household and Outside Maintenance for the Elderly (H.O.M.E.) $ 23,300 Child Day Care Subsidy 20,000 Rehabilitation of Private Property 40,000 Removal of Architectural Barriers 55,818 $139,118 Planner Larsen explained that the four projects are all continued from earlier years of the program. H.O.M.E. - Provides maintenance, repair and chore service for elderly Edina residents and operates through the South Hennepin Human Services • a Council. The request is up from the $19,575 funding level for Year XIV because of the growing demand for these services. Child Day Care Subsidy - The day care subsidy is administered by the Greater Minneapolis Day Care Association. The City began day care assistance last year. The funding request is equal to last year's funding level. Rehabilitation of Private Property - Provides funding through grants for major repairs to income eligible Edina homeowners. Although all Edina residents are eligible, efforts will be concentrated in northeast Edina (area east of France Avenue and north of 60th Street), and Morningside. A single person with an income less than $14,800 would qualify. Up to $8,250 worth of improvements can be made. Removal of Architectural Barriers - Funding will continue to make handicapped access improvements to public buildings. Projects for this year include the Community Center and Braemar Arena. Mayor Richards asked if there were any projects proposed that are not included in the budget and also if the Council has the ability during the course of the year to re- allocate these funds. Planner Larsen responded that no other projects were proposed and that the Council could re- allocate these funds during the year if they felt it was necessary. Member Kelly asked 1) if ,there would be any moneys left over for funding senior citizen and /or youth development projects, and 2) if there was any way those families receiving child day care subsidy could be identified. Planner Larsen explained that if the proposed budget is approved there would not be any moneys this year for senior citizen or youth projects. The CDBG program is a continuing one and occasionally it must be reauthorized by Congress, and usually it is reauthorized at a slightly lower level. If a new project is proposed in the future, staff would try to react to it. As to identification of those families receiving child day care subsidy, there would be some problem with the data privacy law. Member Smith asked if the child day care subsidy is targeted for Edina day care facilities. Planner Larsen said that the assistance is provided to the Edina resident, not necessarily to the provider. Member Smith asked also if the project for removal of architectural barriers would bring the Braemar Arena facilities up to a barrier free status. Planner Larsen said that preliminary estimates indicate that would be the case. No further comments or objections being heard, Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING PROPOSED PROGRAM FOR YEAR %V URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS AND AUTHORIZING ITS SUBMITTAL WHEREAS, the City of Edina, through execution of a Joint Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County, is a cooperating unit in the Urban County Community Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina has developed a proposal for the use of Urban Hennepin County CDBG funds made available to it, following a public hearing on April 3, 1989 to obtain the views of citizens on local and Urban Hennepin County housing. and community development needs and the City's following proposed use of Year XV Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant funds: H.O.M.E Program $ 23,300 (Household and Outside Maintenance for the Elderly) Child Day Care Subsidy 20,000 Rehabilitation of Private Property 40,000 Removal of Architectural Barriers 55,818 Total $139,118 BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Edina approves the proposed use of Year %V Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant funds and authorizes submittal of the proposal to Hennepin County for consideration by the Citizen Advisory Committee and for inclusion in the Year %V Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Statement of Objectives and Project Use of Funds. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards --- Resolution- adopted. - — _ _ Member Kelly suggested that in future years the CDBG budget be reviewed by the Human Relations Commission for their input before it is brought to the Council. OPTIONS FOR PROVIDING TRANSITIONAL HOUSING FOR H014ELESS DISCUSSED; LOCAL PROGRAM TO BE CONSIDERED Planner Phil Dommer explained that as part of the McKinney Act, which is federal legislation regarding the homeless, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), is seeking the assistance of suburban communities 'to provide transitional housing for homeless people. HUD has proposed to lease vacant FHA foreclosed homes to non - profit service providers (SP). The City would identify one SP to work in the community. The SP would place a tenant in the home and would provide job training and other programming. The SP also would pay all taxes, maintenance and utility costs. The SP must also bring the property up to code and make all necessary repairs. The SP could not collect rent from the tenant. After a maximum of 18 months the tenant would move to permanent housing. Advantages - Very little City involvement, upgrading of foreclosed homes, and housing of homeless families. Disadvantages - Targets FHA.foreclosures only, short term temporary housing lending instability to family and neighborhood, and non - profits receive no program support. As a proposed alternate program the City would purchase one "at risk" home using CDBG funds. The service provider (SP) would place a family in the home and provide programming. A local church would sponsor the family as an outreach project.. The sponsor would provide general support and conduct work days at the home to make improvements. The family would pay 12.5% of their income to the SP for services. The SP would be responsible for utilities, maintenance and repairs. The family would pay 12.5% of their income into an escrow fund. After a minimum of 18 months the home would be sold to the family in residence for a price equal to the market value. Down payment assistance would be provided through the escrow fund, the sponsor and a City no- interest deferred loan using CDBG funds. The proceeds of the sale would be recycled to purchase another home and repeat the process. Advantages - Permanent ownership housing, improvement of problem properties, would provide avenue for churches to invest in community, provide stability to family and neighborhood, one time investment would house families and rehab homes repeatedly, and would be minimum strain on non - profits. Disadvantages - Heavy City involvement, large one -time use of CDBG funds, and on -going program. Planner Dommer suggested that Edina could respond in these ways: 1) Choose not to participate, 2) Support the HUD proposed program, or 3) Develop a City sponsored program. He reported that Hopkins and Minnetonka will support the HUD proposed program; Bloomington will develop a city sponsored program. He concluded that the City is not obligated to participate in any way and that staff is seeking direction from the Council. Member Paulus asked if the service providers would be the churches and also if there would be enough service providers in the suburban communities. Planner Dommer said that the service providers generally are established non - profit social service agencies. A number of service providers have indicated that they are interested in working in Edina. Member Paulus asked where HUD repossessions have occurred in the City. Planner Dommer said that generally they have occurred in the northern part of the City - in the northwest sector and W. 44th Street. u Member Rice asked how many local homeless families there were in the City. Planner Dommer responded that Cornerstone Advocacy Service served 50 Edina clients last year of which two were homeless and one of which was basically homeless. Member Rice also asked for a definition of "homeless" and how many "at risk" houses there were. Planner Dommer said that "homeless" meant without housing currently or in temporary social service provided housing. "At risk" housing is housing staff sees as in need of CDBG funds; houses which are in the CDBG target area. These are generated through complaints and also from data on income levels from the Census Bureau. He said he did not have the exact number of those houses. Member Smith commented that he felt this is something that as a community we should take up on the local level. However, he was not persuaded by the types of programs proposed that they would lead to success. He suggested that staff continue to look at alternatives. Also, that if providing a home for the homeless to buy is as appropriate as providing temporary shelter by using some of the City's housing stock for that and doing our fair share in Edina to take care of what is perceived as a national problem. Member Kelly said she would support a City sponsored program, however, the proposed alternative program has heavy disadvantages. Member Smith moved that staff be directed to continue to develop a City sponsored program that would be controlled at the local level. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. PARTICIPATION IN COMMUNITY ENERGY PROGRAM APPROVED Planner Phil'Dommer explained that the City of Edina has the opportunity to participate in the Governor's Community Energy Program. This is a two year program which will serve the community by: 1) Preserving and upgrading the housing stock, 2) Providing technical assistance to homeowners, and 3) Conserving energy. The City•is.:not obligated to participate in any way. Should the City chose to participate the Council will need to adopt resolutions in order to participate in the program. Planner Dommer summarized the program as follows - The two year program provides weatherization services to upgrade the housing stock and conserve energy. - An energy audit and energy related repairs are provided. - Support and administration of the program is mostly from other sources. - Qualified residents receive the services free of charges. Others pay a $10.00 fee. - The City of Edina will join with Hopkins to establish the two year program. - The City of Edina is responsible for community outreach and establishing a Community Energy Council. - The City of Edina must pass resolutions authorizing: a) A joint program and grant application with Hopkins b) The establishment of a Community Energy Council. Participation is recommended as staff was made aware of the program because Edina residents have contacted West Hennepin Human Services for this program. Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDING TO THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF SERVICE, ENERGY DIVISION WHEREAS, the City of Edina is willing to act as a sponsoring unit of government for the project titled "The Conservation Improvement Program ", and WHEREAS, Edina and Hopkins are coordinating their grant application efforts for funding this program; and WHEREAS, the City of Hopkins has agreed to serve as the lead unit of government for this project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina as follows: 1. The City of Hopkins is hereby authorized to apply to the Minnesota Department of Public Service, Energy Service,_ Energy Division for funding of this project on behalf of the City of Edina; 2. The City of Hopkins is authorized to enter into a grant agreement with the State of Minnesota for the project named above and thereafter execute certifications as required and execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the project. 3. The City of Edina authorizes the City Manager to provide $300.00 "in kind" contributions to consist of City staff time, conference room use, copying services, City letterhead stationery, and City sponsored publicity. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A COMMUNITY ENERGY COUNCIL TO SERVE THE CITIES OF EDINA AND HOPRINS BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Background 1.01. The Cities of Edina and Hopkins find it desirable and in the public interest to submit an application for a Community Energy Council grant. 1.02. It is necessary to establish a Community Energy Council to help plan and monitor the delivery of the programs administered under the Community Energy Council Grant. Section 2. Community Energy Council Established 2.01. There is hereby established a Joint Community Energy Council, to consist of citizens appointed by the Mayors and City Councils of the two cities. 2.02. In accordance with State requirements, the Community Energy Council shall include citizen representatives of labor, small business, volunteer organizations, senior citizens, and low and moderate income residents. 2.03. In so far as possible, each of the two cities shall have an equal representation on the Community Energy Council. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Paulus. Mayor Richards said he could not support the proposed program because he felt there was a hidden cost in administering the program; that he felt the residents would be intelligent enough to try to make their homes as energy efficient as possible, and that government should not be involved. Planner Dommer explained that funding for the program is really not government funding except for the people's energy grant. It is funded through Minnegasco and Northern States Power Company and they will fund the program in Edina or somewhere else, so indirectly Edina residents are paying for it somehow. Bruce Larson, West Hennepin Human Services, observed that in administering the Energy Assistance Program they have received a number of calls for assistance from people who are over the guidelines established by the federal government. In an effort to look at alternatives and how to respond to those requests, they have learned about this program which is a state requirement under what is called the Conservation Improvement Program whereby public regulated utilities are required to make a certain amount of investment in some conservation activities. Both Minnegasco and NSP have been involved in doing this for a number of years, especially with investments in the City of Minneapolis. The City of Richfield also has had a long history of participating in this kind of program. Mr. Larson said that what West Hennepin Human Services did was to approach the utilities with the fact that there are a lot of other utility rate payers out there that were not been offered the service. West Hennepin proposed a joint effort whereby the service would be available to those rate payers and that at the same time would meet the needs of the people who have been contacting West Hennepin. Member Rice asked if staff participation would be required. Planner Dommer responded that West Hennepin Human Services would provide staff support and the City staff would provide in -kind contribution consisting of some staff time, copying services, letterhead stationery and City sponsored publicity. Mayor Richards then called for rollcall vote on the question. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice Nays: Smith, Richards Resolutions adopted. *HEARING DATE SET FOR PIANNING MATTER Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly setting April 17, 1989 as hearing date for the following Planning matter: 1) Amendment to Final Development Plan, Edinborough - Hawthorn Edina, Inc. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. NOTE OF APPRECIATION FOR CITY EMPIAYEES & SERVICES PRESENTED Bob McLane, 4527 Arden Avenue, read a note of appreciation for City employees and services as a means to say "thank you" to all the employees for their dedicated, thoughtful, efficient and caring services. He cited several occasions when City crews responded to watermain breaks with dispatch and efficiency. He also praised the City for the excellent snow plowing services which it provides. Mayor-Richards thanked Mr. McLane for sharing his comments. CONCERNS ABOUT REAL ESTATE TARES EXPRESSED John Harrington, 4416 Fondell Drive, expressed his concerns about the increase in real estate taxes over the past several years. He presented figures reflecting the increases in real estate taxes on his home, including a 21% increase over last year, and asked what he could expect in future years. Mayor Richards said that he could only speak for the part of the tax dollar which is spent by the City and that approximately 85% of the City budget comes from the real estate tax dollar. He said he felt that the residents get value for the taxes they pay for the services rendered. Mayor Richards said that he, too, is concerned and has talked with Representative Mary Forsythe who has also expressed her concern about what is happening. He said that the Council meets with the City's legislators on a regular basis and would continue to convey these concerns. Assessor Ralph Johnson said that he would hope the schools would not find it necessary to levy an extra 24.1% next year, that the County's levy increase of 13% is probably not a fluke, and that the 5% levy increase of the City is fairly typical in a time of 4 -5% inflation. He added that he could not predict what will happen next year and what the needs for the schools may be, having lost a lot of their aids. Member Smith suggested that Mr. Harrington be given a copy of the MLC's booklet entitled "A Guide to Minnesota's New Property Tax System" which might be helpful in understanding the tax system. He also pointed out that the state legislature is the one that sets up our taxing system. Manager Rosland commented that the City has been involved, and the Council has dedicated moneys, in fighting the current taxing system whereby the metropolitan suburbs pay a disproportionate share of the tax burden and will continue to do so. a Robert Spear, 4703 Sunnyside Road, said that his real estate taxes have been going up 15 -20% a year and that it this continues he will not be able to retire and continue to live in his home. He said he concurred with the concerns express by Mr. Harrington and asked that something be done to alleviate the tax burden. CONCERNS E%PRESSED OVER SPRAYING IN PARRS Pam Nelson, 5520 Countryside Road, expressed concerns for her children over the use by the City of the herbicide 2 -4 -D in spraying - parks. She asked - that the Council -do the following concerning . this controversial chemical: 1) Require large orange warning signs detailing any chemicals used in the park /playground areas, 2) To ban the use of 2 -4 -D and those pesticides which contain it, and 3) To instruct staff to convert the parks system to a biological integrated pest management system. Sally Mays, 5529 Countryside Road, said that, as a mother of two small children, she was in support of Mrs. Nelson's proposal and emphasized that warning signs should be posted whenever the parks are sprayed. Park Director Bob Kojetin explained that, generally, for the past three years the parks have been sprayed with a new type of chemical that does not contain 2 -4 -D. Mayor Richards asked that staff bring back a report before the first spraying with all the facts as to the present use of chemicals and with their recommendations for further consideration by the Council. *AWARD OF BID FOR AERIAL PERSONNEL LIFT CONTINUED TO 4/17/89 Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly to continue the award of bid for an aerial personnel lift to April 17, 1989. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID REJECTED FOR 1989 TOW TRUCK: UNIT TO BE RE -BID Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly to reject the bids for a 1989 tow truck as recommended by staff because the bids were over budget and to re -bid the unit. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR DIESEL GENERATOR Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for a 50 KW Diesel Generator to sole bidder, Interstate Detroit Diesel, Inc., at $15,759.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR TWO DUMP TRUCKS Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for two dump trucks to recommended bidder, Astleford International Co., Inc, at $67,057.18 (with trade -in). Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR SEWER RODDER Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for a sewer rodder to sole bidder, Flexible Pipe Tool Company, at $19,986.00 (with trade -in). Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR SAND, ROCK. BITUMINOUS & CONCRETE MATERIALS Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bids to recommended low bidders as follows: Concrete Sand (delivered) to Prior Lake Aggregate at $2.89 per ton; Buck Shot (delivered) to Prior Lake Aggregate at $8.35 per ton; Limestone (delivered) to Ed Kraemer & Sons at $5.19 per ton; Seal Coat Chips (delivered) to Hassan Sand & Gravel at $11.85 per ton; Ready Mix Bituminous #2331 or #1332 (pick -up) to Midwest Asphalt at $14.95 per ton; Ready Mix Bituminous #2331 Fine (pick -up) to Midwest Asphalt at $15.60 per ton; Ready Mix Bituminous #2341 (pick -up) to Midwest Asphalt at $16.20 per ton; Ready Mix Bituminous Winter Mix (pick -up) to Bury & Carlson at $28.00 per ton; Concrete (delivered) to AVR, Inc. at $42.00 /three cubic yards and $42.00 /one cubic yard, and to Model Stone Company (alternate) at $43.00 /three cubic yards and $43.00 /one cubic yard; Cut Back Asphalt (delivered) to Koch Materials Company at $.8236 per gallon. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR WATER TREATMENT CHEMICALS /CITY WELLS Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for water treatment chemicals for City wells to recommended low bidder, Hawkins Chemical, Inc. at $53.67 per 100 lbs. of hydrofluosilicic acid and 100 lbs. of liquid chlorine. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR THREE GANG GREENS MOWER Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for a three gang greens mower to recommended low bidder, North Star Turf, at $7,740.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote,_ five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR DISHWASHER FOR BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for a dishwasher for Braemar Clubhouse to recommended low bidder, PYA/Monarch, Inc. at $9,981.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NOS. WM -368 AND WM -369: LIFT STATION #9 (CONTRACT 89 -4 ENG) Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for Watermain Improvement No. WM -368 (Water Tower -Van Valkenburg Park - Malibu Drive to Interlachen Blvd), Watermain Improvement No. WM -369 (Valley View Road - Junior High School Site Well-#19 and for overhaul of Life Station #9 (Division Street west of Oxford Av) to recommended low bidder, S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. at $101,950.50. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR ADMINISTRATION CAR Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for one Administration car to�, recommended low bidder, Walzer Buick, at $14,483.00. .Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR STREET SWEEPER BRUSHES Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for street sweeper brushes to recommended low bidder, Old Dominion Brush, at $6,850.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. ATTENDANCE AT ANNUAL COMMUNITY HEALTH CONFERENCE URGED Manager Rosland called the attention of the Council to the Annual Community Health Conference to be held at Madden's Resort near Brainerd on September 27 -29, 1989. This Conference is the only public health conference in Minnesota designed with Community Health Board members in mind to broaden their understanding of local public health. Local Community Health Board members are being encouraged to attend the Conference. QUARTERLY COUNCIL STORY SESSIONS DATES NOTED Mayor Richards announced the following dates for quarterly Council study sessions before the end of the year: June 17, September 16 and December 16. Member Kelly asked that another date be considered instead of June 17. Mayor Richards asked the Council to think of an alternative date and said that this would be back on the Council Agenda of April 17 for confirmation. PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -287 (FO% MEADOW LANE IN OAK PONDS OF INTERLACHEN) ORDERED: BIDS TO BE TAKEN Engineer Hoffman advised that the developer of the Oak Ponds of Interlachen 2nd Addition subdivision has petitioned the City to construct permanent street surfacing with concrete curb and gutter. The developer's agreement provides that the entire cost of the improvement be assessed against the property owners over a ten year period. Estimated cost was presented as follows: PERMANENT STREET SURFACING IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -287 Location: Fox Meadow Lane Interlachen 2nd WITH CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER in Oak Ponds of Addition $22,377.50 Member Kelly introduced the following resolutions and moved adoption: RESOLUTION ORDERING PERMANENT STREET SURFACING - ---- - - - - -- - - - - WITH- CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER- - IMPROVEMENT- NO. BA-287 - BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. ,It is hereby found and determined that a petition has been filed requesting the Council to construct a street improvement on Fox Meadow Lane in the Oak Ponds of Interlachen 2nd Addition and that the developer now owns all property which will abut and be assessed for the improvement. 2. The making of said improvement in accordance with said petition is hereby ordered pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.031(3), (Session Laws of 1961, Chapter 525, Section 2). Said improvement is hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -287. The entire cost of said improvement is hereby ordered to be assessed against the properties abutting on said Fox Meadow Lane where said improvement is to be located. RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -287 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA; 1. The plans and specifications for the proposed improvements set forth in the following Advertisement for Bids form, heretofore prepared by the City Engineer and now on file in the office of the City Clerk are hereby approved. 2. The Clerk shall cause to be published in the Edina Sun and Construction Bulletin the following notice of bids for improvements: (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER AND BITUMINOUS SURFACING CONTRACT #89 -7 (ENG) IMPROVEMENT NOS. BA -284, BA -287 & BA -288 BIDS CLOSE 13 APRIL, 1989 BIDS will be received and opened in the Council Chambers in Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street at 11:00 A.M., Thursday, April 13, 1989. The Edina City Council will meet at 7:00 P.M., Monday, April 17, 1989 to consider said bids.. The following are approximate major quantities: 4,140 LF B6 -18 Curb & Gutter 1,060 LF Drive Over Curb & Gutter 2,910 TONS Cl. 5A Gravel 3,502 TONS Bituminous 159 TONS FA3 Traprock Seal Coat . 2,517 SY Sod Bids shall be in a sealed envelope with a statement thereon showing the work covered by the bid. Bids should be addressed to the City Engineer, City of Edina, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424, and may be mailed or submitted personally to the City Engineer. Bids received by the City Engineer, either through the mail or by personal submission, after the time set for receiving them may be returned unopened. Work must be done as described in plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Clerk. Specifications are available at Edina City Hall Engineering Department. No bids will be considered unless sealed and accompanied by bid bond or certified check payable to the City of Edina in the amount of at least ten (10) percent of all bids. All plans mailed, enclose separate check for $5.00 payable to the City of Edina for postage and handling. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL. .Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk Motion for adoption of the resolutions was seconded by Member Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolutions adopted. PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -288 (PINEWOOD TRAIL IN PINEWOOD ADDITION) ORDERED: BIDS TO BE TAKEN Engineer Hoffman advised that the developer of the Pinewood Addition subdivision has petitioned the City to construct permanent street surfacing:with concrete curb and gutter. The developer's agreement provides that the entire cost of the improvement be assessed against the property owners over a ten year period. Estimated cost was presented as follows: PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER $14,875.72 IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -288 Location: Pinewood Trail in Pinewood Addition Member Kelly introduced the following resolutions and moved adoption: RESOLUTION ORDERING PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -288 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. It is hereby found and determined that a petition has been filed requesting the Council to construct a street improvement on Pinewood Trail in Pinewood Addition and that the developer now owns all property which will abut and be assessed for the improvement. 2. The making of said improvement in accordance with said petition is hereby ordered pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.031(3), (Session Laws of 1961, Chapter 525, Section 2). Said improvement is hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -288. The entire cost of said improvement is hereby ordered to be assessed against the properties abutting on said Pinewood Trail where said improvement is to be, located. RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -288 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA; 1. The plans and specifications for the proposed improvements set forth in the following Advertisement for Bids form, heretofore prepared by the City Engineer and now on file in the office of the City Clerk are hereby approved. 2. The Clerk shall cause to be published in the Edina Sun and Construction Bulletin the following notice of bids for improvements: (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER AND BITUMINOUS SURFACING CONTRACT #89 -7 (ENG) IMPROVEMENT NOS. BA -284, BA -287 A BA -288 BIDS CLOSE 13 APRIL, 1989 BIDS will be received and opened in the Council Chambers in Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street at 11:00 A.M., Thursday, April 13, 1989. The Edina City Council will meet at 7:00 P.M., Monday, April 17, 1989 to consider said bids. The following are approximate major quantities: 4,140 IF B6 -18 Curb & Gutter - - -1 -060 LF Drive,Over Curb - &- Gutter 2,910 TONS Cl. 5A Gravel 3,502 TONS Bituminous 159 TONS FA3 Traprock Seal Coat 2,517 SY Sod Bids shall be in a sealed envelope with a statement thereon showing the work covered by the bid. Bids should be addressed to the City Engineer, City of Edina, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424, and may be mailed or submitted personally to the City Engineer. Bids received by the City Engineer, either through the mail or by personal submission, after the time set for receiving them may be returned unopened. Work must be done as described in plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Clerk. Specifications are available at Edina City Hall Engineering Department. No bids will be considered unless sealed and accompanied by bid bond or certified check payable to the City of Edina in the amount of at least ten (10) percent of all bids. All plans mailed, enclose separate check for $5.00 payable to the City of Edina for postage and handling. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL. Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk Motion for adoption of the resolutions was seconded by Member Rice. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolutions adopted. TRI -CITY HIV INFECTION COALITION ACTIVITIES APPROVED David Velde, CHS Administrator, informed the Council that the Community Health Services Advisory Committee had, at their meeting on March 22, 1989, adopted a recommendation in support of the Tri -City HIV Infection Coalition workplan and were now requesting endorsement of the coalition's activities by the City Council. CHS Administrator Velde presented the following background information. In 1986 the Minnesota Commissioner of Health challenged all Community Health Service (CHS) agencies to address the AIDS epidemic from a community perspective. They were asked to develop a local response to this illness believing that a broad based local response would be more effective in controlling the spread of the disease. In late 1987, the Minnesota Department of Health began proving HIV /AIDS training for local CHS agencies. To date MDH has sponsored three sessions which provided training for policy development and provided information about integrating HIV /AIDS prevention activities into local programs. In January 1988, the cities of Bloomington, Edina and Richfield formed a HIV Task Force to study the HIV /AIDS issues affecting their communities. The coalition began gathering information about what other agencies have done regarding HIV in the community and what resources are available in the communities. The coalition recognized the need to develop support from city councils, school boards and other elected and appointed officials. To this end the coalition sponsored an information forum on February 11, 1989 for elected officials to provide them with technically accurate information about HIV /AIDS. The coalition is now preparing to expand the group by forming task forces to address five issues: education, policy development, care and treatment, funding resources and risk reduction. Before continuing with the formation of the task forces, the coalition thought it wise to determine whether the city councils are willing to support these activities. If the councils approve the concept, the coalition will begin to expand the task forces and begin the next step of its action plan. The findings of the task forces will be brought back to the city councils via the CHS Advisory Committees of the three communities as soon as possible, perhaps by the end of 1989. The coalition also recognizes the lack of financial resources for HIV related activities and will concentrate on foundation grants for funding of activities whenever possible. Motion was made by Member Kelly to approve and endorse the Tri -City HIV Infection Coalition's workplan and activities as presented. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *PETITION FROM RESIDENTS OF VERNON TERRACE OF EDINA.FOR A STRIPED WALKWAY ACROSS VERNON AVENUE REFERRED TO TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE Motion vas made by Member Paulus and vas seconded by Member Kelly to refer the petition from residents of Vernon Terrace of Edina for a striped walkway across Vernon Avenue to the Traffic Safety Committee for recommendation. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. MSP INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT EXPANSION STUDIES REPORT PRESENTED: RESOLUTION ADOPTED FOR FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION Mayor Richards introduced Mayor Steven Quam and Manager Jim Prosser of the City of Richfield. He indicated that they were present to speak to the request of Richfield and Bloomington for participation in a plan to supplement and independently assess the information developed in the Metropolitan Council Airport Adequacy Task Force Study and in the MAC ten year plan concerning MSP airport expansion. Mayor Quam explained that the cities of Richfield and Bloomington had asked the City of Edina to participate in the study because they felt Edina had similar interests in the economic benefits of keeping the airport at its present site. He said that the tone of the study is intended to be an effort to provide helpful information that they feel has not been addressed as yet in the previous reports. There has been no convincing data that the airport needs to leave our area, and if it does have all the issues been studied that relate to the negatives as well as the positives that would occur with a new site. The legislation that has been introduced in the House of Representatives seems to presume the idea that ultimately there will be a new airport. Mayor Quam said that there are some real issues in terms of the economics for the I -494 area communities, the cost of the infrastructure that it would take to build new highways leading to a new airport location, and the impact on the downtowns of the area. Those kinds of things are the issues that will be addressed and is the tone and intent of the study. He concluded by saying they would welcome and appreciate the participation of the City of Edina. Manager Prosser reiterated that the purpose of the proposed 'study is to examine a number of issues which they feel was not addressed by the Metropolitan Council Task Force which ultimately recommended a dual track approach for the MSP airport. That dual track approach included: 1) Recommending construction of the north /south runway roughly parallel to Cedar Avenue, and 2) That a task force be established to examine on a regular basis the need for a new airport, including the recommendation that a land bank be established for eventual relocation of the airport. The concern that resulted from that recommendation was quite clear for Bloomington and Richfield and that was that there appeared to be a predisposition of the Metropolitan Council to recommend that a new airport be constructed in the very near future. Also, that the north /south runway be constructed in the near future. Manager Prosser explained that the problem with the recommendations was that there was never a real consideration of the environmental and economic impacts of either of those recommendations. Those concerns expressed by Richfield and Bloomington were also shared by members of the MAC. As a result, they took a look at some strategies -to- address the information deficiencies - -that was not--addressed--by-the Metropolitan Council study. Manager Prosser said that what the City Councils of Bloomington and Richfield were being asked to do' is to bring in a group that will examine the issues salient to both of these decisions. First, the experts would be asked to take a specific look at the information that has already been provided supporting the recommendations. Secondly, they would be asked to identify information deficiencies and to correct those where possible in support of a conclusion which addressed some specific points. Those include 1) Whether of not there is a need, immediate or near term, with airport capacity and projecting out into the longer term some of the capacity issues; 2) The capability of MSP to accommodate any future traffic projections and to look at alternatives to enhancing airport capacity; and 3) To take a look at the economic impact of relocating the existing airport and the opportunities for economic growth that would be affected by that airport. The concept of constructing a new north /south runway also has to be looked at. The FAA as well as MAC have said that is not a good alternative and will not accommodate the type of traffic appropriate for that airport. In essence, the recommendation to build the north /south runway with the fact that FAA and MAC both agree that 1) it probably would not be built because of environmental concerns, and 2) it would not provide enough capacity is almost a certain sentence of obsolescence for the current airport. That conclusion should not be reached without further study. In conclusion, Manager Prosser said they are asking for a study which will address existing information deficiencies. That information will then be taken to the Legislature, representatives of which have indicated that they would look favorably upon receipt of the information and would probably wait for this information before making a final determination. Mayor Richards asked what the other communities have done as to participation. Mayor Quam explained that the cost of the study would be approximately $100,000 to be pro -rated 2/3 to Bloomington and 1/3 to Richfield. Burnsville has agreed to participate in the range of $5- 10,000. Eden Praire will be considering the recommendation at their meeting on April 4 and have indicated a favorable response. Eagan, which has questions about flights from certain expansions, has declined to participate at this point. Mayor Donlin of Minnetonka has not brought the request to the Council and Plymouth has not scheduled a date for discussion. Following some discussion, Member Smith participate in the airport issues study Bloomington with funding of $5,000.00. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. made a motion that the City of Edina proposed by the cities of Richfield and Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. MINNEAPOLIS ORDINANCE CONCERNING PLASTICS BAN DISCUSSED Member Paulus referred to the recent Minneapolis ordinance concerning the ban on certain plastics used in food packaging and suggested that the Recycling Commission review the ordinance and bring back a report to the Council as to whether or not Edina should also consider a similar ordinance. HEIGHT OF POSTAL SERVICE MAILBOX SLOTS QUESTIONED Member Rice referred to a recent newspaper article concerning the height of the Postal Service drive -up mailbox slots and said he had observed a near mishap when an elderly man had to open his car door in order to reach the slot and had forgotten to place his vehicle in park. Member Rice suggested this be checked into to see if something can be done to have the height lowered. RESTAURANT INSPECTION VIOLATIONS DISCUSSED Member Rice asked if it was the City's responsibility to let the public know when a restaurant fails a health inspection. Sanitarian Dave Velde said that this is usually handled by educating the restaurant staff and following up with subsequent inspections to get the situation reversed. Past practice has been that the matter is brought to the Council if a restaurant fails a third inspection. Manager Rosland pointed out that there have been several cases over the past years when a restaurant continually failed inspections and eventually the Council took action to close the facility. LETTERS TO MAYOR NOTED Mayor Richards brought the following letters to the Council's attention: 1) Letter from Lola Popken, 7606 York Avenue So., Unit 7101, concerning Edinborough Park usage. This will be referred to.the Park Board for recommendation and response. 2) Letter from Citizens Council, Roseville, concerning City Manager hiring /dismissal, Council Member sanctions, recall of Council Members and ethical practices. He said copies would be in the next Council packets for discussion. 3) Letter from Commissioner John Keefe inviting the Council to the annual Recycling Recognition Luncheon on Wednesday, April 19. R.S.V.P. are requested by April 12. PROPERTY TAX PROPOSAL NOTED Manager Rosland referenced a proposal for restructing the Minnesota Property Tax which has been supported by the City of Bloomington. Basically, the following proposal has been developed: A. State assume all K -12 school funding, except for debt service and referendum levies. Remove schools from the property tax statewide totaling approximately $1.4 Billion per year (estimated 1989). B. Abolish the following tax relief and tax credit mechanisms and use the money to replace the $1.4 Billion for schools: Homestead Credit $638.0 million Local Government Aid 403.7 Agricultural Credit 72.8 Taconite Aid 47.0 Circuit Breaker & Renters Credit 131.4 Disparity Aid 65.4 Total estimated 1989 $1,378.3 The proposed restructuring would leave cities, counties, townships, special taxing districts, and school debt service and referendum levies on the general property tax, with full accountability within the local community as to how tax money was being spent. Under this proposal, Edina taxes would go down about 25 %. The proposal has been favorably received by some but there is a question as to how the school districts would feel as they would lose some flexibility. 'Manager Rosland said this has been brought to the Council's attention basically for informational purposes. AMM AND LMC MEETING DATES NOTED Manager Rosland reminded the Council of the following meeting dates and suggested their mark their calendars: AMM Annual Meeting - May 31 LMC Annual Conference - June 6 -9 Additional information concerning the meetings will be provided when received. CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly for approval of payment of the following claims dated 4/3/89: General Fund $69,743.13, Art Center.$7,607.78, Capital Fund $13,782.68, Golf Course Fund $25,723.96, Recreation Center Fund $12,197.22, Gun Range Fund $165.48, Edinborough Park $5,546.89, Utility Fund $245,042.44, Storm Sewer Utility $2,328.70, Liquor - -- Dispensary -Fund- $912..50, -IMP- Bond - Redemption - - #2- $600.51,_Total. $383,651.29._ ___ -- Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes., There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the meeting adjourned at 11:05 p.m. City Clerk MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL APRIL 17, 1989 The meeting was called to order by Mayor Richards at 7:00 p.m. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Paulus, Rice, Smith and Richards. Member Kelly entered the meeting at 7:05 p.m. DISABILITY AWARENESS WEEK PROCLAIMED Motion of Member Smith was seconded by Member Paulus for adoption of the following resolution: PROCLAMATION - DISABILITY AWARENESS WEEK WHEREAS, a significant effort is being made Statewide to eliminate barriers for disabled persons in the areas of employment, housing, transportation, education, and public accommodations; and WHEREAS, many individuals with disabilities are living independently in our community and participating in community activities such as community education and recreation; and WHEREAS, both city officials and school administrators desire public awareness as to the issues and concerns facing disabled persons; and WHEREAS, residents of our community need to become more aware, not only of the limitations disabled persons have, but also of their talents and abilities; and WHEREAS, the Governor of the State of Minnesota, and each of the South Hennepin communities, are proclaiming Disability Awareness Week in recognition of the contributions disabled individuals make within the State and the communities in which they live; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Frederick S. Richards, Mayor of the City of Edina do hereby proclaim the week of April 24 -30, 1989 as DISABILITY AWARENESS WEEK in Edina. Further, I urge all residents of our City to be more open and attentive to the needs and abilities of persons with disabilities. Motion was adopted unanimously. Mary Jean Coates expressed the appreciation of the Edina Advisory Committee and introduced members who were present. She noted that this is the first anniversary of the Edina Adaptive Recreation Program which gives children with disabilities the chance to participate with other children. She said that the Program is of benefit to the whole community. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Smith to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented, with the exception of the removal of items IV.0 and V.D. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF JANUARY 17. FEBRUARY 6 AND FEBRUARY 21 AND JOINT HRA /COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 21, 1989 APPROVED Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Smith to approve the minutes of the regular meetings of January 17, February 6 and February 21 and the joint HRA /Council Meeting of February 21, 1989. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED ON PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -283 AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEIENT NO. P- STS -190: IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk and ordered placed on file. Pursuant to due notice given, a public hearing was conducted and action taken as hereinafter set forth: A. PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -283 IN THE FOLLOWING: Blake Road from Vernon Avenue to Pine Grove Road B. STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. P- STS -190 IN THE FOLLOWING: Blake Road from Vernon Avenue to Pine Grove Road r r Engineer Fran Hoffman stated that the proposed project was developed as a result of a petition for additional storm sewer systems and results of a neighborhood survey and would consist of: 1) Replacing the existing street with a new street with curb and gutter at a 32 -foot width - face of curb to face of curb. 2) Installation of storm sewer system from Pine Grove Road to Vernon Avenue along Blake Road. (Consistent with City policy to attempt to lower flood potentials by moving storm water from private to public areas.) 3) Elimination of on- street parking to allow street to be constructed at 32 -foot standard consistent with State standards for state aid funding. 4) Consideration of installation of sidewalks per City comprehensive plan to improve pedestrian access along City collector streets. Estimated cost includes a sidewalk on the west side of Blake Road from Vernon Avenue to South Knoll Drive. The approximately cost of the improvements are estimated by Hennepin County and the City at $889,982.57. The proposed project is to be built in 1989 and to be funded by storm sewer utility funds ($350,000), municipal gas tax funds ($489,000) and with $51,000.00 assessed against abutting property owners. The special assessment for Blake Road is $20.00 per lineal foot (front yard) and $6.67 per lineal foot (side yard). Engineer Hoffman said that the primary concerns of the residents appear to be: 1) preservation of the existing tree line along the west side of Blake Road, 2) that the street width remain as close as possible to existing width, 3) to provide a better storm water system, and 4) strong concern, both pro and con, over need for sidewalk. He presented a graphic showing the results of a survey that was sent to 54 Blake Road residents with 27 responses returned. Engineer Hoffman then presented a number of slides depicting the existing roadway as it meanders from one side of the right of way to the other on the portion of Blake Road from Vernon to South Knoll Drive. The existing roadway actually is on private property at the northeast corner of Blake and Eden Prairie Road and angles to the northwest as it approaches South Knoll Drive. From South Knoll to Pine Grove Road, the existing roadway is approximately thirty feet wide. Thus the existing roadway would be reconstructed with basically adding curb and gutter. Engineer Hoffman also pointed out the existing trees and landscaping features that would be taken into consideration for the proposed project. He explained that there is an existing storm water pipe on the east side of Blake Road and south of Pine Grove Road that runs through the back yards for drainage of storm water. The proposed project would include a storm sewer system going up Blake Road and east on Pine Grove for installation of some catch basins to divert the storm water down the street instead of through the back yards. In conclusion, Engineer Hoffman stated that staff finds this project to be feasible and would recommend approval. If Council wishes to proceed, they should authorize the improvement projects and also pass a resolution banning parking on both side of Blake Road in the project area. Member Smith asked whether the trees on the west side could be preserved. Engineer Hoffman indicated that the existing roadway is about 30 feet wide in the area and without sidewalk there would be no problem. Member Smith also asked about the type of curb /gutter that would be used. Engineer Hoffman said it was the standard type (B618) that is used where there are defined driveways. Also, that drive -over types would not meet state aid standards. Member Smith then asked about the feasibility of constructing the roadway without curb and gutter. Engineer Hoffman explained that without curb and gutter state aid funds could not be used and so that part of the cost would have to be assessed back to abutting properties, roughly estimated at $200,000. If constructed to state aid standards In (nine tons) the roadway would last considerably longer than an asphalt reconstruction. Traffic counts on Blake Road indicate that it should be done to state aid standards. All collector roadways in the City are being built to the nine ton standard. He also observed that state aid funding for sidewalk can only be used on collector or county arterial streets that meet standards for state aid funding. Member Rice asked how a project like this comes about, and also why the project ends at Pine Grove Road. Engineer Hoffman explained that the project started following a petition to the Council for storm sewer after the rain storm of July, 1987. The reconstruction of the roadway was scheduled for 1990 in the City's Capital Plan. However, construction of a storm sewer system would have resulted in the roadway being torn up so the road reconstruction was moved up one year to coincide with the storm sewer project. The storm sewer proposed is a very large pipe from the pond area down to Bredesen Park in keeping with the City's new policy of trying to move storm water from private to public areas. The project is proposed from Vernon to Pine Grove Road because funds are not available to go all the way up to Interlachen Boulevard, and also in the Mirror Lake area there is some question as to inadequate right of way. Member Paulus asked what the average width of the lots was on Blake Road. Engineer Hoffman said that the lots varied from 75 feet to 160 feet in width. Mayor Richards asked if the proposed $51,000 special assessment is a fixed figure based on current City policy, with or without sidewalk. Engineer Hoffman said that would be the assessment. The cost of the sidewalk, if it were to be done, would be covered by state aid funds. Mayor Richards then called for public comment on the proposed projects. Wayne Childs, 5725 Blake Road, said he objected to any improvement of Blake Road and also asked that a load restriction be put on Blake Road to keep off trucks. Jon Farris, 5401 Blake Road, said that he was against construction of sidewalk. He presented a letter from Thomas and Hyun Bloodgood, 5413 Blake Road, who objected to the project as proposed because they felt it will not alleviate the flooding problems they have experienced because of runoff from homes and property on Highwood Avenue. Max Boller, 6112 Kaymar Drive, asked that the roadway be maintained where it presently is and not be moved to the east as he would lose side yard. Bob Covey, 6112 Jeffrey Lane, said that he was not interested in sidewalk and would like to see restriction for weight of trucks. Mike Thompson, 6201 Parkwood Road, said he was concerned about the nine mature oak trees on his property if sidewalk were constructed and could only see a need for sidewalk south from Kaymar Drive. Martha,Anderson, 6205 Parkwood Road, said sidewalk should be constructed for access to Bredesen Park and for safety of pedestrians. Duane Sorby, 6117 Kaymar Drive, said he supported construction of the storm sewer but was not in favor of sidewalk as too many trees would be lost. Dr. Paul Carson, 6001 Pine Grove Road, said he was concerned about the width of the road and where sidewalk would go. He suggested that the roadway be made narrower to control traffic and that sidewalk should be placed away from the roadway. Mrs. Beamish, 5710 Blake Road, said she supported the storm sewer project, did not support sidewalk and that there should be no widening of the roadway. Grachia Jacobson, 5718 Blake Road, said she originally was against construction of sidewalk but now had heard about the families with young children in the area. She said that if a sidewalk is constructed that a trash container should be placed at the corner of Blake and Vernon to help eliminate the trash they continually have_to__pick_up _ in the area. Henry Haverstock, 6112 Saxony Road, said he was against construction of sidewalk as it would undermine the rural character of the area, but that he was in favor of the storm sewer project. Mary Kay Covey, 6112 Jeffrey Lane, said she was against sidewalk from the standpoint that the children that will be using them are those that have bikes and that pedestrians will be fighting the bike traffic. Speaking in support of the project with sidewalk were: Janet Nelson, 6200 Idylwood Lane; Mitchell Kiffe, 6304 Knoll Drive; Jim Elving, 5601 Blake Road; Linda Farrell, 5700 Blake Road, Beth Zweigoron, 6101 Jeffrey Lane, Bill Goetsch, 6113 Jeffrey Lane; and Cathy Fisher, 6229 Idylwood Lane.. Mayor Richards asked Engineer Hoffman to address the concerns about loss of trees and landscaping and his recommendation as to location of sidewalk. Engineer Hoffman explained that one tree on the west side across from Eden Prairie Road will go because it juts out. If the sidewalk and roadway is not moved further to the west it is expected that no further trees will be removed. On the east side there is a power pole line that at some points is located 15 feet from the street. He-said that the only trees or landscaping that they could not work around are the arborvitae at the second home from Pine Grove Road. Those would be replaced as part of the project. As to location of the sidewalk, Engineer Hoffman said he would recommend sidewalk on the west side of Blake Road to Jeffrey Lane. At that point pedestrians could cross the road because the sight distances are favorable. Sidewalk is recommended on the east side from Jeffrey Lane to Pine Grove Road. Patty Merker, a non - resident, commented that a stop sign at Jeffrey Lane would serve to protect pedestrians crossing at that point and would also discourage traffic cutting through the area. Mayor Richards then said the public hearing was closed and called for discussion by the Council Members. Member Kelly said she liked Dr. Carson's suggestion that the sidewalk be located away from the roadway. Engineer Hoffman explained that on the west side it would not be possible because of the grade levels. From South Knoll Drive there possibly could be a boulevard area between the street and sidewalk. The same problem exists on the east side. However, the sidewalk could be moved back in some areas. Member Kelly asked if the roadway would be moved to the east if sidewalk were put on the west side as recommended. Engineer Hoffman said that the roadway would remain in roughly the same location. Member Smith asked for a review of state aid standards. Engineer Hoffman said he would recommend the B618 standard curb whether or not it was in the standards. If no on- street parking is required the roadway can be constructed at a 32 -foot width standard. Member Smith asked if sidewalk would be recommended if it would not be funded by state aid funds. Engineer Hoffman said he did not feel it was a monetary issue but that it was a part of the overall City sidewalk system which could be funded now by state aid funds. Member Smith asked if the project would enhance Blake Road and if traffic would increase. Engineer Hoffman said it would be like any of the other collector streets that are rebuilt - there is not a lot of change in travel patterns. However, over the next 15 years the City will see traffic volumes up on the collector streets as the freeways get more congested. Member Smith then asked if the proposed storm sewer system would help those properties that suffered flooding in July of 1987. Engineer Hoffman responded that he felt it would help considerably. Member Paulus then moved approval of the proposed project to consist of the following: 1) Replace the existing street with a new street with curb and gutter with 32 -foot width, 2) Install storm sewer system from Pine Grove Road to Vernon Avenue along Blake Road, 3) To eliminate on- street parking on Blake Road, and 4) To install sidewalk on the west side from Vernon Avenue to Jeffrey Lane and on the east side from Jeffrey Lane to Pine Grove Road, and introduced the following resolutions and moved adoption: RESOLUTION ORDERING STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -283 AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. STS -190 BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that this Council heretofore caused notice of hearing to be duly published and mailed to owners of each parcel within the area proposed to be assessed on the following proposed improvements: PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -283 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT STS -190 and at the hearing held at the time and place specified in said notice, the Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the construction of said improvements including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights for construction and maintenance of such improvements; that said improvements are hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as follows: PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -283 AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT STS -190 and the area to be specially assessed for a portion of the cost of the proposed improvement shall include: Lot 8, Blks 1 & 2, Parkwood Knolls 3rd; Lots 1 & 2 and 12 & 13, Blk 1, Parkwood Knolls 5th; Lot 9, Blk 1, Parkwood Knolls 6th; Lot 9, Blks 1 & 2, Parkwood Knolls 7th; Lots 10 -12, Blk 1, Parkwood Knolls 8th; Lot 1, Blks 1 & 2, Idylwood; Lots 1 -5, Blk 1, Idylwood 5th; Lot 4, Blk 2, Luce Highwood; Lot 5, Blk 3, Luce Highwood; Lots 16 & 17, Blk 1, Les Anderson's Highwood 2nd; Lot l & 8, Blk 1, Valley Park; Lot 1, Blk 1, Jones Knolls; Part of Lot A, RLS 194; RLS 1081; and Lot A & B, RLS 1286. RESOLUTION RELATING TO PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON S.A.P. 120 - 147 -10 FROM CSAH 158 (VERNON AVENUE) TO PINE GROVE ROAD IN THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA THIS RESOLUTION, passed this 17th day of April, 1989, by the City of Edina in Hennepin County, Minnesota. The Municipal corporation shall hereinafter be called the "City ", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City has planned the improvement of MSAS 147 (Blake Road) from CSAH 158 (Vernon Avenue) to Pine Grove Road; and WHEREAS, the City will be expending Municipal State Aid Funds on the improvement of this Street; and WHEREAS, this improvement does not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the street approval of the proposed construction as a Municipal State Aid Street project must therefore be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions, and WHEREAS, the extent of these restrictions that would be a necessary prerequisite to the approval of this construction as a Municipal State Aid project in the City, has been determined. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the City shall ban the parking of motor vehicles on both sides of MSAS 147 (Blake Road) at all times. Motion for approval and adoption of the, resolutions was seconded by Member Smith. Mayor Richards asked for discussion on the motion. Member Kelly suggested that the issue of sidewalk be held for more input from the residents. Member Rice said that there were comments on both sides of the sidewalk issue and on the safety issue. Engineer Hoffman said he thought sidewalks would be safer. Mayor Richards commented that he intended to support the motion. He said that the issue of sidewalk has always been controversial. Time spent over the last 10 years in adopting a sidewalk plan for the City has resulted in a good plan. It does not grid the City with sidewalks., that was not the intent of the plan, but it was to serve principally the collector streets in order to enable residents who walk or ride bikes to get to public amenities in a safer fashion. Member Paulus said she felt that everyone whose property will be affected by the sidewalk has been contacted; that the negative comments about sidewalk are from individuals with specific concerns for their property; that Blake Road will see increased traffic volumes in the future as a fact of life; that without sidewalk residents in the neighborhood will be isolated from the park unless they drive there which will result in more increased traffic. She said the solution was to construct sidewalk on these types of streets. Member Rice asked about the possibility of a stop sign at Jeffrey Lane. Engineer Hoffman said that is an option; however, there is the possibility of vehicles running the stop sign and also neighbors objecting to noise from vehicles stopping and starting up again. Member Smith asked if landscaping enhancement was part of the project as was done on West 50th Street. Engineer Hoffman responded that some hardwoods and evergreens are included in areas where they would fit. Mayor Richards then called for rollcall vote on the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. (Mayor Richards convened a joint BRA /Council meeting.) PUBLIC HEARING ON AMENDMENT TO FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, EDINBOROUGH AND AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE CONTINUED TO 5/1/89 Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk and ordered placed on file. The amendment to the Final Development Plan, Edinborough and the amenmdnent to the Zoning Ordinance affecting the same property, public hearings were conducted concurrently. Planner Craig Larsen presented the request for Final Development Plan for Edinborough and for amendment of the Zoning Ordinance for a vacant 3.5 acre parcel located immediately west of the senior high rise and southwest of Edinborough Park. Amendment to Final Development Plan and Zoning Ordinance Amendment - The approved plan, as amended in 1987, illustrated an eight story, 159,470 square foot office building. He advised that the office building has not been constructed. Staff has received a request from Hawthorn Suites to amend the Final Development Plan to allow the construction of a seven story, 142 unit hotel. Another action that would be required would be amendment of the Zoning Ordinance. The Mixed Development District MDD -5 does not allow the hotel as a free standing principal use. The proponents are requesting that hotels be added as a permited principal use in the MDD -5 District. Planner Larsen explained that the proposed hotel contains 136 two -room suites and six efficiency units, one on each floor, designed for handicapped occupancy. The units range in size from 450 to 500 square feet with the efficiencies at 408 square feet. The hotel is designed to attract the extended stay business traveler. The hotel does not have a restaurant or bar but does have a reception area where guests are served complimentary breakfast and hor d'oeurves in the evening. The hotel would be seven stories and 65 feet in height and would contain a gross floor area of 90,286 square feet. This would compare to 90 feet in height for the existing easterly seven story office building and 104 feet in height for the eight story office building previously approved. Planner Larsen presented a graphic illustrating proposed parking and landscaping. Parking required would be 157 spaces; 166 spaces are provided by the site plan. BRW, Inc. drafted the landscape plan which emphasized two things. First, would be be compatibility with the overall Edinborough landscaping concept, and secondly, the screening of the service entrance on the north side of the hotel. The MDD -5 District requires a building setback of 50 feet from the perimeter of the tract. The proposed plan illustrates a setback of slightly over 36 feet from the westerly property line. The original proposal by Hawthorn did maintain a 50 foot setback, but did not have the step design to the building which staff encouraged the developers to incoroporate, similar to the existing office building. The reduced setback is a result of the design modification and the developer's need to maintain the proposed room count. The approved site plan for Phase II office building at the site received a variance to reduce the setback to 27 feet at this same point. Planner Larsen pointed out that the City retained BRW, Inc. to critique the design of the hotel proposal principally because BRW, Inc. was the master planner for Edinborough. Staff believes that the hotel represents a use which would be compatible with and complementary to Edinborough. The hotel does not have a bar or restaurant and will not host significant conferences and conventions. It will have more of a residential character than a typical full service hotel. The hotel use would also be a much lower peak hour traffic generator than an office use. The design of the building has changed significantly during the planning process for the development. Staff is now satisfied that the design, scale, and materials of the proposed building are compatible with Edinborough. BRW, Inc. has stated that they feel the current proposal is consistent with the goals of the Edinborough project. In conclusion, Planner Larsen stated that the proposal was reviewed by.the Community Development and Planning Commission on April 5, 1989. The Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the Final Development Plan, amendment of the Zoning Ordinance and approval of the proposed setback variance, subject to an executed redevelopment contract with the HRA. Amendment to Redevelopment Agreement. Edinborough - HRA Executive Director Gordon Hughes stated that the HRA would have to consider amendments to the existing redevelopment contracts to facilitate development of the site. The present contracts have two major elements. The purchase price for the subject property was negotiated back in 1985 and was pegged to a base price of $5.94 /square foot. It included some escalators for reimbursements to the HRA. In that approximately . four years has gone by since that was negotiated, the purchase price has now grown to approximately $11.80 /square foot. By the terms of the existing contract, all the land sale proceeds from this parcel, with the exception of the reimbursements to the HRA and a contribution to the City, would go to the East Edina Housing Foundation. The Foundation is required to use the proceeds of the land sale to acquire some second mortgages for the Edinborough condominiums which were actually funded by the developers of the project. The developers now own approximately $795,000 worth of second mortgages that exist in the Foundation's name for units at Edinborough. The Foundation if and when it sells the subject vacant parcel is obliged to use the proceeds from the sale to purchase back the mortgages. Director Hughes explained that the reason for that is that back when the Edinborough project was first envisioned it was felt that the office sales would proceed along with the development of the condominiums. Actually, the condominiums developed much faster and the Foundation did not have the moneys to fund the mortgages; the developers elected to fund the mortgages with the understanding that when this property was sold the Foundation would purchase the mortgages. The-proposed amendments __to the_ redevelopment agreements to facilitate the Hawthorn Suite project would contain the following terms: 1. The HRA and the Foundation would consent to the assignment of development rights to Hawthorn Suite. A purchase price of $1,127,902 or $7.25 /square foot is suggested. The purchase price would enable the Foundation to purchase the redeveloper second mortages. This purchase price would also include reimbursements to the HRA for park dedication, grading and special assessments, and the $50,000 contribution to the City. 2. Hawthorn Suites propose to grant an non - exclusive easement for parking over approximately one -half of its parking lot, providing an additional 80 spaces for park use. 3. Hawthorn Suites propose to pay an annual park maintenance fee of approximately $25,500 which equates to $15.00 per guest room and would be on par with what the condominiums pay. Member Kelly said she was concerned with amending the Zoning Ordinance to permit hotel use in the MMD -5 District. She asked what guarantee the City would have that it remain a suite hotel and not be converted to a full service hotel or any other use. Planner Larsen said that any proposed change in use would have to go through the zoning process. Also the definition of hotel in the amendment could be structured to limit the type of hotel. Member Smith asked about the involvement of BRW, Inc. with the proposal. Planner Larsen explained that the City hired BRW, Inc. to review the proposal from the architectural standpoint and compatibility with the overall design concept of Edinborough. They have been hired by the developers to do civil engineering on the site and to do the landscaping for the project area. Member Paulus asked about the impact of the hotel's service entrance /service hours and concerns that were noted by the Planning Commission and also in correspondence from residents of Edinborough. Planner Larsen pointed out that the service entrance is offset so that it will not be directly visible from the north. It would be partially shared with the City's proposed tram -way line and would be screened with a small berm and additional landscaping. Mayor Richards then called for a presentation by the proponents. John Lyons stated that he was the Senior Project Director for the proposed project. He explained that Hawthorn Suites is an all suite hotel chain that has been in operation approximately two years. It was recently purchased by the Fritzger family who also owns the Hyatt Hotel organization. A commitment was made last fall by the Fritzger family to proceed-with substantial capital investment and development of Hawthorn Suites on a national basis. The subject property was one initially selected and in many respects represents a flagship for effort in that regard. Steve Goldman, representing Hawthorn Suites, explained that his role in the project has included site selection, working with the operating company in doing market research, and determining how the hotel will fit in with the type of product they are looking to do. Hawthorn Suites as it compares with a typical hotel really evolved out of a desire to provide something that gave an accommodation that was more like home, with a residential feeling. Their research indicated that there is a market for this type of hotel and that they could capitalize on the guest who has an extended stay need - extended stay meaning five or more days. Their goal was to provide a top quality hotel with guest rooms that have separate living space and sleeping area within the units. They also wanted to take advantage of the park and the residential setting that was already created and to provide a compliment to the existing facilities. Mr. Goldman presented graphics illustrating the proposed hotel suites with the added living space. This would provide a working area and would be better suited for families. Because it would be a rooms only hotel and would not be supporting other facilities, it would allow more efficient operation. A market study projected that the rack rates would range from $80/120 depending on the room type, length of stay and the occupancy factor. These would be rates before any discounts or long term stay. The study projected that an occupancy rate of 75% would be achieved in the third year. The conclusion was that the project was feasible from a market standpoint. In terms of the component of guests, the study estimated that they would have 45% extended stay (five nights or greater), 30% of mid -range business travelers (between one and four nights), 25% family and other pleasure travelers. Mr. Lyons then presented graphics showing hotel support areas, guest rooms, meeting rooms and public spaces. He said they bring their Hyatt experience to the development of this type of property; typically that is a hands -on development role. They have been intimately involved on all the design issues on the proposed project. Each project is viewed as a custom design facility shaped to fit the situation. In meetings with staff early on, it became very clear that there were several fundamental concerns that would need to be addressed in the design of the facility. The primary description was that the massing for the hotel needed to be consistent with the rest of the Edinborough complex. Similarily, the exterior materials needed to be compatible or identical. Lastly, that the flow areas in and out of the hotel needed to work with the design that had been developed in the earlier phases of the Edinborough project. He explained that they have had some experience with the atriem concept - it does create an activity area. The architects have been asked to focus the public space facing the park to create a lobby area and a Hawthorn Room that would almost have the feel of a sidewalk cafe overlooking the activity of the park. This would also provide park users with a view of looking into a sidewalk cafe as opposed to a building wall. Some of the other concerns were creating a link for the public space to the park, a front entrance easily accessible to Minnesota Drive and to a a reception and front desk location which would be supervised on a 24 -hour basis. Mr. Lyons pointed out that some of the other constraints given the architects concerned the internal organization and function of the hotel. He explained the need for the kitchen area to be next to the Hawthorn Room. An internal receiving area and a trash area was needed that would be adjacent to a external service delivery area. The proposed food service is designed as a complimentary service and an amenity for the hotel guests and is not designed to be used by external individuals. As a result the kitchen area is approximately 450 square feet. With food service being minimal (breakast and hor d'oeuvres) the trash generated as well as food delivered is significantly less than as seen in a full service hotel. It is anticipated that trash pickup would be three days a week and that food service deliveries would be three to four days a week during normal business hours. Mike Jordan, Winsor /Faricy Architects, Inc., presented the site plan and elaborated on how the hotel would be consistent with the park uses and requirements. He noted that the hotel location was limited to the existing building pad intended for the office building and is an extention of the master plan ,for Edinborough. The main entrance is off Minnesota Drive. The parking lot would have 166 parking spaces of which only one -half would be required for hotel use. The remainder would be available for park use including several handicapped spaces. A dropoff area would be located adjacent to the west park entry. He pointed out that the building bends at a 45 degree angle which allows an increased setback from the north property line which is 60 feet further that the earlier proposed office building. This would increase the open area between the hotel and -- the - condominiums and also increased the sunlight available to the park. The building also relates back to the geometry of the park, the easterly office building and the layout of'the senior tower. Exterior surfaces will be the same as the materials -in the Edinborough complex. Peter Jarvis, BRW, Inc., stated that their charge from staff was: 1) to meet with the Hawthorn team, review the concept and convey to them the overall master plan criteria that was established from the beginning for the Edinborough project, and 2) to advise the City as they reviewed the evolution of the project as to those elements which they felt were consistent with Edinborough and those that were not. He said everyone of those issues have been addressed. With respect to the site plan, Mr. Jarvis reiterated the comments in his letter that they find the project totally consistent with Edinborough from both a site, landscaping and actual design standpoint. He spoke to two items of operational significance relative to the park function. First, an intermediate or secondary drop -off area has been incorporated for the southwest quadrant. Secondly, already constructed was a combination walkway and, ultimately for the Southeast Edina Transit System, a tramway that would operate immediately south of Phase V of Edinborough. Some concern has been voiced over the last year about the proximity of this facility and such time as there are relatively frequently operating vehicles. As the hotel site plan began to take shape the opportunity was there to combine the relatively infrequent hotel service function with the transit function. This element is a slight modification but a positive one to the present situation in the westerly part of the outdoor Edinborough park. Regarding the landscaping plan, Mr. Jarvis said that it meets the spirit of the existing Edinborough landscaping. In conclusion, Mr. Jordan said that they have worked several evolutions so that the proposed project would be consistent with the Edinborough project. He also advised that they have conducted meetings with representatives of the senior housing, the condominium association and members of the East Edina Housing Foundation. Mayor Richards then called for comment from the public. Susan Britzius, resident of Edinborough, voiced her objections to the hotel proposal and her concerns about hotel guests using the park, additional traffic, safety for walkers and that there would be no benefit for the Edinborough residents. Brian Hamann, resident of Edinborough, said he agreed with the comments just made and also asked why the office building is not being built as originally planned. He said he understood market research showed there was not a need but questioned why 1.2 million square feet of office is proposed for the adjacent Centennial Lakes project. Mayor Richards noted receipt of letters of objection from Laura Davis, 7631 Edinborough Way #5311 and James and Bernadine Prokop, 7631 Edinborough Way #5111. Member Smith asked if someone could answer the office building market question. Tom LaSalle, partner with the Edinborough group, said financing is one of the difficulties. Of the 1.2 million square feet of office proposed for Centennial Lakes not all is financed. Projects like Homart and Centennial Lakes have made it more difficult to finance the office building that was proposed for the subject site because of its location. The east Edinborough office building has better visual access from the freeway as well as better access from York Avenue. He said they had difficulty coming up with a product they could finance and thought the hotel would be a use that would be compatible, would bring a service to Edina that does not exist, and would be positive to both the condominiums and senior building as it would not be a full service hotel with the usual problems associated therewith. Member Paulus asked what effect the hotel use would have on the park versus an office use; also whether the park could handle the additional use. Park Director Bob Kojetin responded that it has been contemplated all along that whatever was built on the subject site would have park users. There would be a difference as to time of usage - more evening users from the hotel than day users as anticipated if it were office. He noted that the park is heavily used how and the locker rooms may be inadequate at times. Member Rice asked several questions: a) number of feet from Edinborough residents to the service area, b) reference to the "existing building pad ", c) physical impact of the hotel, d) if amending the Zoning Ordinance to permit a hotel use would it allow another type hotel to be built on the site if Hawthorn Suites was not built, e) timetable for the project and when the HRA and City would collect the fees, f) hotel versus office use from a public safety standpoint, g)-signage, and h) anticipated use of the park's facilities by hotel guests. Mr. Jarvis said that, as proposed, there would be a range of 122 to 160 feet from the face of the hotel to the Edinborough condominiums. Regarding the building pad, he explained that this site had the major soil problems in the Edinborough project. When BRW, Inc. did the original soil exploration it was concluded that in order to design a building for the site it would require deep excavation. When the entire site was mass graded this site was prepared for nothing more than a simple bituminous parking lot with the exception of the building pad area which precluded relocation of the building. The physical impact of the hotel would be less because it would be further away and have less height. Planner Larsen confirmed that if the Zoning Ordinance is amended to permit a hotel use another hotel could be built on the site. Attorney Erickson advised that the recommendation from staff for approval of rezoning was conditioned upon an executed redevelopment agreement. The redevelopment contract would specify that they build a certain building (size, shape, color, 'etc.). The City would have rights of reversion until that specific building gets built. He added that the HRA still owns the property at this point and it would be sold on the condition that they build a certain kind of hotel. Mayor Richards suggested that if the proposal is approved that approval be subject to it being rezoned. Mr. Lyons responded to the question as to timetable for the project. He said they hoped to break ground in late June or early July and were anxious to get started before winter sets in. Attorney Erickson said that the proposed amendment has a closing date of September 30 and fees would not be paid to the HRA and City until the closing occurs and the cash is available. With regard to the issue of public safety for a hotel use versus office, Chief Craig Swanson commented that they have not researched that issue but that, generally speaking, a transitory population may be more difficult. He noted, however, that office is transitory as well as hotel residency. Concerning signage, Planner Larsen said staff anticipates that the sign ordinance would be amended to handle both the Centennial Lakes project and this type of use within Edinborough. Mr. Lyons responded to the question of use of the park's facilities by hotel guests. He said they have a lot of hotel experience with health club services and what they have found is that those facilities are important in the marketing brochures, but how much they get used is another issue. If the hotel achieves 708 occupancy that would be 100 rooms occupied on the average. He said that 208 of that occupancy would be a high usage of the park facilities. Member Smith commented that the hotel guest use of the park would be during the prime time when Edinborough residents would be home and would like to use the park. He asked what would be the expected weekend occupancy for the hotel. Mr. Goldman said that experience with extended stay hotels has shown that people come in on Monday and leave on Friday. Weekend occupancy is expected to be low and will be more local as opposed to business people and transients. Member Paulus asked if weekend occupancy would mean a party atmosphere, e.g. 10 people renting one unit and bringing sleeping bags, and said that could result in misuse of the park. She asked how they would control that. Mr. Goldman cited an the Embassy Suites as an example, noting that because of their higher costs that they seek that type of weekend business. He said they will not actively seek that type of weekend business and that park usage could be controlled through passes for pool and track use. Number of guests will also be monitored through breakfast usage. Member Rice then asked if there is a problem with parking capacity for Edinborough. Manager Rosland responded that there is only a problem when there is an event scheduled in the park during the normal business day - then parking between the office and park usage becomes crowded. Member Rice asked if there should be an easement to allow construction of a parking deck over-the subject property if there was need for additional parking in the future. Mayor Richards asked if there would be cross easements on the parking lot that would run to the City. Attorney Erickson.said that none had been drafted and that the discussion concerning public use of parking spaces has been concerning the southern half of the parking lot. Mayor Richards asked why the southern one half and what Hawthorn's response would be if there is no restriction whatsoever on the parking. Mr. Lyons explained that they have asked to reserve 85 spaces closest to the entrance for hotel use exclusively and that if there were no restriction it would be a disadvantage to the hotel guests. Mayor Richards said it did not make sense to him, if there were a park function and the hotel was at low occupancy, to have restricted parking. Mr. Lyons said he understood the concern but that it was their understanding in the original development process that parking spaces would be designated for exclusive hotel use. They felt they were making a concession in the interest of the City by allowing one -half of the parking spaces to be used by park users. Mayor Richards raised the issue of use of liquor in the facility. He asked if the proponents understood the City's ordinance on liquor and that they cannot use or sell liquor in the hotel. He asked what their intent was concerning liquor. Mr. Lyons stated that they have been proceeding with not setting up a liquor sales operation. Mayor Richards asked if they intended to offer a free drink with the hor d'oeurves. Mr. Lyons said that he was not sure of the laws relative to giving away wine or liquor and said they are prepared to abide by the existing laws. If the current laws permit giving away of liquor they would like the option of doing that, but do not intend to ask for a variance from the existing laws. Mayor Richards commented that he had two concerns: 1) that he did not favor the approach of having parking for the hotel to the exclusion of the public and would prefer having an easement across the entire parking lot to allow anyone to park, and 2) that he wanted the serving of liquor issue resolved. He said he would not be prepared to vote on the proposal without those two concerns being answered by the proponents. He stated further that he felt the proposed hotel project is a compatible use with the existing Edinborough development and that the type of people who would frequent the facility would be consistent with what otherwise is an excellent land use of southeast Edina. Member Smith asked if this site could be zoned for no liquor. Attorney Erickson said it would not be appropriate to put that restriction in the Zoning Ordinance. The existing liquor ordinance does not allow selling by the glass and does not allow giving away of the product as part of a marketing package. He opined that if liquor were to be served as part of the complimentary hor d'oeurves it would be contrary to the ordinance. With regard to the the proposed transfer of land, Member Rice said he had done some investigating on the value of the property and generally concurred with the appraiser as to value. He said he was of the opinion that the proposed hotel was a good land'use and would support .it. However, he felt the City should think about protecting its position with an option to repurchase the property if for some reason the hotel was not built. He said he would also support cross easements on the parking lot to permit public parking. He asked if there are cross easements over the existing parking in Edinborough. Manager Rosland said that there is public parking throughout the project except the lower level of parking by the office building which is used exclusively by the office during the daytime. In summary, Mayor Richards said there are four issues that need to be dealt with: 1) signage, 2) parking, 3) timetable for the project, when the fees would be paid and City's position if not built, and 4) liquor use. He recommended that this be continued until May 1 for responses to these concerns. Member Kelly reiterated her concern that the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance be specifically addressed to this proposed hotel project. Motion was made by Member Smith that the public hearing on amendment to Final Development Plan, Edinborough and amendment to Zoning Ordinance be continued to May 1, 1989 so that the proponents could respond to the issues raised by the Council. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR LOT 6. BLOCK 4. PARKWOOD KNOLLS 11TH ADDITION (5812 -14 VIEW LANE Planner Larsen presented the request for a lot division for property at 5812 -14 View Lane, Lot 6, Block 4, Parkwood Knolls 11th Addition. The subject property is an existing double bungalow that does not have the required separate water services. The lot division is requested in order to facilitate the separate sale of the two units. The proposal would be exempt from the moratorium on subdivisions as the lot division would not create a new buildable lot and is not a R -1 District zoning. The Community Development and Planning Commission considered the request at its meeting of April 5, 1989 and recommended approval, subject to the installation of individual water service. Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land: Lot 6, Block 4, Parkwood Knolls 11th Addition, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for said County except that part which lies Easterly of a line drawn from a point on the Southeasterly line of the above described Lot 6 distant 26.0 feet Southwesterly of the Southeast corner of said Lot 6, to a point on the Northeasterly line of said Lot 6 distant 25.0 feet Northwesterly of the Southeast corner of said Lot 6; and WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows: Northwesterly Parcel: That part of Lot 6, Block 4, Parkwood Knolls 11th Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, and situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota lying northwesterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the northeasterly line of said Lot 6 distant 93.81 feet northwesterly of the southeast corner of said Lot 6; thence Southwesterly to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 6 distant 93.86 feet northwesterly of the southerly corner of said Lot 6 and there terminating. Southeasterly Parcel: That part of Lot 6, Block 4, Parkwood Knolls 11th Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, and situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota lying southeasterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the northeasterly line of said Lot 6 distant 93.81 feet northwesterly of the southeast corner of said Lot 6; thence southwesterly to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 6 distant 93.86 feet northwesterly of the southerly corner of said Lot 6 and there terminating. Except that part which lies Easterly of a line drawn from a point on the southeasterly line of the above described Lot 6 distant 26.0 feet southwesterly of the southeast corner of said Lot 6, to a point on the Northeasterly line of said Lot 6 distant'25.O feet Northwesterly of the Southeast corner of said Lot 6. WHEREAS, the requested subdivision is authorized under Ordinance No. 801 and it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purpose of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance Nos. 801 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of the second above described Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 825 and Ordinance No. 801 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land, but only to the extent permitted under Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 and subject to the limitations set out in Ordinance No. 825, and said Ordinances are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and further subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. (Member Kelly was temporarily absent on call of vote.) *WELL ABANDONMENT - CENTENNIAL LAKES APPROVED Motion was made by Commission Paulus and was seconded by Commissioner Smith for award of bid for well abandonment for the Centennial Lakes project to recommended low bidder, E.H. Renner & Sons, Inc., at $12,450.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. (Mayor Richards declared the BRA Meeting adjourned.) *BID AWARDED FOR AERIAL PERSONNEL LIFT Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for an aerial personnel lift (installed) to recommended low bidder, ABM Equipment b Supply, Inc., at $13,528.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *AWARD OF BID FOR STATIONARY BREATHING AIR COMPRESSOR CONTINUED TO 5/1189 Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Smith to continue the award of bid for a stationary breathing air compressor to May 1, 1989. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. AWARD OF BID FOR GRASS FIRE FIGHTING SLIDE -IN UNIT CONTINUED TO 5/1189 Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice to continue the award of bid for a grass fire fighting slide -in unit to May 1, 1989. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *BID AWARDED FOR 1/2 TON 4 %4 VAN Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for one 1/2 ton 4x4 van to Polar Chevrolet at $16,187.00, under Hennepin Contract #9544. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR ONE TON 4 %4 PICKUP TRUCK Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for a one ton 4x4 pickup truck to Polar Chevrolet at $14,567.00, under Hennepin Contract #9544. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR MINI -VAN Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for a mini -van to Thane Hawkins Chevrolet at $11,389.00, under Hennepin Contract #9544A. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB & GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NOS. BA -284, BA -287 AND BA -288 Motion vas made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for Permanent Street Surfacing With Curb & Gutter Improvement Nos. BA -284 (Minnesota Drive from France Av to Edinborough Way), BA -287 (Fox Meadov Lane) and BA -288 (Pinewood Trail) to recommended low bidder, Bury & Carlson, Inc., at $148,243.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR 314 TON PICKUP TRUCK Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for one 3/4 ton pickup truck (cab and chassis only) to Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet at $11,379.00, under Hennepin County Contract #9544. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. CITIZENS AGAINST PORNOGRAPHY VOICE CONCERNS REGARDING SHINDERS Ron Dahl, 5920 Tamarac Avenue, said that he represented a group of individuals present who are concerned about the pornography being offered for sale at Shinders located at 7101 France Avenue. He said they had very strong feelings about the issue of pornography. His family and many of those present had chosen to live in the community because of the schools, the park system, the general quality of life and the absence of establishments serving liquor and the absence of establishments which promoted behavior which they felt did not meet the standards of morality which the citizens of Edina adhere to. Because they love the community, they are concerned about what is occurring in the City. Most people who live here assume that the standards are very high and assume that people in City government are watching those standards for them. Mr. Dahl said the issue can become very emotional but that he would present it in more of a logical fashion and would try to be precise as they had a specific action they would request of the Council. fo Mr. Dahl stated that Shinders is distributing and selling, along with baseball cards and comic books, material that according to the Supreme Court, the statutes of the State of Minnesota, and the City ordinance is clearly obscene by all the definitions. This material can be readily purchased at Shinders. He said that the group he is representing has available photo copies of materials that is typical of what is being sold at Shinders and which they feel is grossly obscene. Because of information made available in the press, the public is becoming more and more aware of the long term damage of the use of pornography in our society. He made reference to an interview granted by Ted Bundy prior to his execution wherein he attributed much of his deranged behavior to a long addiction to pornography. Specifically, Mr. Dahl said that Shinders has an adult's only section, sectioned off by a swinging door, that can be seen from the entrance and what is visible there is enough.according to every law written to qualify as obscene literature. Their concern is especially for the children who visit the store for baseball cards and comic books. He said they felt it their responsibility as citizens to remove this kind of blight from the community. Mr. Dahl said they were not asking the City to close Shinders book store - all they were asking was that, by the Council's direction through the Police Department, the laws of the State of Minnesota be upheld and that this material be be removed from public display and sale. He urged the Council Members to investigate and check out what has been presented. He concluded that they were not asking the Council to make a moral decision; that has already been established by the court system and by the law passed in 1988. They are simply asking that the law be upheld and that something that is not necessary for the citizens of Edina be cleaned up. Also speaking in objection were Carolyn Owens, 5243 Brookside Court, Barbara Bergan, 4804 Woodhill Way, Caroline Falstad, 5415 Abbott Place, Barbara Wendberg, Bloomington resident, and Thea Pearson, resident of Edina. Mayor Richards said that this was a serious issue and deserved thoughtful reflection and honest responses from their elected officials. He said this is not a simple issue and in all fairness the Council would need to reflect on the issue raised and then respond. Before that, however, they would need to hear from the Chief of Police, representatives of Shinders, legal,counsel and would need to reflect upon what the First Amendment really means. Following discussion by the Council, Member Paulus made a motion that this issue be continued to May 15, 1989 and that the City Manager be directed to coordinate resource information to be brought back to the Council. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF 4/11/89 APPROVED Member Kelly moved approval of the following recommended action in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of April 11, 1989: 1) To change the City ordinance by resolution to reflect the new hours of enforcement, Monday through Saturday, 8 AM to 6 PM for the West 51st Street parking ramp; and to acknowledge Sections B and C of the Minutes. Motion for approval was seconded by Member Smith. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION 10 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota that in accordance with Ordinance No. 1232, Section 2(d), the hours of enforcement for parking of vehicles in the municipal parking facilities at the 50th and France Commercial Area shall be Monday through Saturday, 8:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. CHEMICAL HEALTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT GIVEN Pat Llona, outgoing chair of the Chemical Health Advisory Committee, said that the Committee has been in existence for nine years. She then reviewed the Committee's accomplishments to date and introduced Betsey Flaten as incoming Chair to explain the activities they are currently involved in. Betsey Flaten, Committee chair, said that she was excited about the things that are occurring in the community. Even though research has indicated that alcohol use has not changed over the last ten years, within the last year there has begun a slight decline. This is an indication that what the Committee has been trying to do is beginning to work - that having a lot of messages at different levels is beginning to pay off. The Committee has worked during the past year at networking - connecting resources - to get the school working with the City, using community education and the youth development project as ways of getting out the prevention message, and also by involving churches and businesses. She distributed a packet of materials to the Council on chemical health and briefly reviewed activities for the past year and those that are being developed: 1) Through the youth development project high school students are mentoring younger students, 2) Developed a homework club at two elementary schools, 3) Have a big brother/big sister project called "Project Friend" which they hope to expand, 4) Have people working on extended day care programs to reach the children that become at risk as they enter the older elementary grades and have nothing to do in the afternoons, 5) Through the youth development project there will be a resource center at the Community Center, 6) They are talking about the possible year of the family (family meaning the community as the extended family), 7) Programs with early childhood and family education will be started including elements about chemical health, 8) Parent community information is going out and is off to a good start. 9) Parent communication network newsletter going out three times a year including parenting issues and chemical health information, 10) Restarting articles in the Edina Sun on chemical abuse prevention, 11) Trying to set up more kinds of parent workshops to reach parents at different levels. The earlier they reach parents and families the better, so they are looking at pre - school screening as an opportunity to talk about chemical health. She advised that a Chemical Health Workshop for Edina Congregations is scheduled for May 6, 1989 at Colonial Church as a way to get the churches involved in reaching not only the teenagers but the whole adult community. They have begun talking to business leaders and have found there is some interest in doing in- service work to talk about chemical health issues with employees. They are attempting to involve the whole community because the biggest issue in chemical health is the use of alcohol. On -set for children using alcohol is approximately 11.5 years of age on the average. By 8th grade 80% have tried alcohol and 50% of those had more than just sips. It is known that alcohol and tobacco are gateway drugs and if the use can be stopped in the earlier years the more likely it will keep kids from moving on to harder drugs. Alcohol use is the most devastating drug in the adult population and is the most costly. In summary, Mrs. Flaten said that Edina has the potential to be a leader in chemical health - there are a lot of good people and good ideas - but they need to tie it all together. What they are looking for is leadership in the schools, the community, the business community, civic organizations and City government so that all work together. Some of the old approaches that have been tried have not been effective and they are now trying the approach of bringing in kids who have made the choice not to use chemicals to teach the younger kids through role playing how to say "no ". The other approach is adult role models and community mind -set that as a community we stand together - we enforce our rules and set family policy. She said to be effective is has to be a broad based community approach and it has to be comprehensive. In closing she quoted from the Hennepin County Task Force on Youth and Drugs. "Much more can and should be done in the area of prevention and education. These efforts must become a movement that permeates all levels and all sectors of society. There is a need for more strategic leadership and coordination and promotion of prevention efforts at the local level." Mayor Richards thanked Mrs. Flaten and the Committee for the work they have been doing regarding chemical health. He suggested that the Council and also the City staff review the packet of materials provided and then further discuss the suggestions as to involvement of the Council and the City. SOUTH HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES COUNCIL REPORT TO BE RESCHEDULED Paul Gens, SHHSC Member, advised that because of the late hour Chair Tim Culver has rescheduled his report on the South Hennepin Human Services Council for a future meeting. -,.He invited the Council Members to attend the Annual Meeting of SHHSC on April 20 at Christ Presbyterian Church, Edina. CITY -WIDE RECYCLING PROGRAM PROPOSALS APPROVED Recycling Coordinator Janet Chandler referred to the background materials provided in the Council packets concerning the recycling proposals. She elaborated on the recommendation made by staff and the Recyling Commission that two proposers, BFI and Waste Management, be selected for further consideration. The reasons for the recommendation were that the two proposers came in with the lowest cost proposals, they have the shortest lead time required for start -up, and they have excellent track records with the cities that have used them for their recycling service. Super Cycle, with the highest contract cost and longest lead time should be dropped from consideration. Wachman and Sons, although lowest in cost, have no experience in residential recycling and did not respond to the invitation to meet with the Commission. Mayor Richards asked if representatives were present from Super Cycle and Wachman and Sons that wanted to speak to the issue of the recommendation that they not be considered further. No response was heard from either proposer. Representatives from BFI and Waste Management said they were present to answer any questions. Mayor Richards then asked for comment from the Council. Member Smith said he felt that somehow out of the present charges for trash hauling we should be able to extract enough money to take care of recycling. He said he was bothered that we were adding another cost for recycling on top of what residents are already paying for trash hauling. He presented figures on cost of trash hauling and savings resulting from reducing the number of trash containers, through recyling, that are picked up each week. He estimated that a reduction of one container would carry with it $.80 which would fund the recycling program. Member Smith suggested: 1) Seeking volume based fees from all Edina haulers, with credit for recycling, and 2) Moving to one hauler for both trash and recyling and thereby attempt to control the costs in that fashion. Member Kelly made a motion to approve the following recommended action: 1) Select BFI and Waste Management for final contract consideration, 2) Schedule further staff discussions with these two contractors and incorporate the suggestions of Member Smith in the negotiations, and 3) Select contractor and program options at the May 1 Council Meeting. Motion for approval of the recommendations was seconded by Member Paulus. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. Member Paulus suggested that the staff also bring back a recommendation concerning containers for the Council to reconsider. It was informally agreed that the container issue be included in the recommendations for the May 1 meeting. PLASTICS BAN ORDINANCE TO BE DRAFTED Manager Rosland said that in response to the direction of the Council the Recycling Commission discussed the Minneapolis Plastics Ban Ordinance and voted unanimously in favor of the City's adoption of a plastics ban ordinance similar to the Minneapolis Ordinance. Staff would recommend referral to the City Attorney for preparation of a draft ordinance. Member Smith made a motion that the City Attorney be directed to draft an ordinance for consideration by the Council similar to the Minneapolis Ordinance banning plastics. Motion was seconded by Mayor Richards. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. PERMANENT STREET_ SURFACING WITH CURB & GUTTER. SIDEWALK, LANDSCAPING LIGHTING AND BRIDGE IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -289 ORDERED: NO PARKING RESOLUTION ADOPTED FOR W. 76TH STREET Engineer Hoffman explained that the improvement project is a reconstruction of West 76th Street as the street is realigned through -the Centennial Lakes project. The proposed project consists of: - Permanent Street Surfacing with Curb and Cutter - Landscaping in Medians and Boulevards - Ornamental Street Lighting - Bridge over Transitway and Waterway - Sidewalk. The estimated cost for the,project, including engineering and capitalized interest, is $1,503,963.00. Approximately $900,000.00 would be funded by municipal state aid gas tax funds with the balance of the project costs to be assessed against all Centennial Lakes Phase I properties. This improvement is petitioned by the developers and the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for the Centennial Lakes project. Staff has found the project to be feasible and would recommend approval of the project and adoption of a no parking resolution as required by state aid standards. Mayor Richards asked if the proposed project is consistent with the concept approval previously reviewed and acted upon by the Council and also if the proposed funding is also consistent with what has previously been reviewed and discussed. Engineer Hoffman responded that it is. No objection being heard, Member Smith introduced the following resolutions and moved adoption: RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -289 (WEST 76TH STREET) BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. It is hereby found and determined that a petition has been filed requesting the Council to construct permanent street surfacing with concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, landscaping, lighting and bridge on West 76th Street from Edinborough Way to France Avenue, with approximately $900,000,000.00 of the project costs to be paid by municipal state aid funds and with the balance to be assessed against all Centennial Lakes Phase I properties. 2. The making of said improvement in accordance with said petition is hereby ordered pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.031(3), (Session Laws of 1961, Chapter 525, Section 2). Said improvement is hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as: PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, SIDEWALK, LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND BRIDGE IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -289. The balance of the project costs not paid by municipal state aid funds is hereby ordered to be assessed against all Centennial Lakes Phase I properties. RESOLUTION RELATING TO PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON S.A.P. 120 - 136 -08 FROM CSAH 17 (FRANCE AVENUE) TO EDINBOROUGH WAY IN THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA THIS RESOLUTION, passed this 17th day of April, 1989, by the City of Edina in Hennepin County, Minnesota. The Municipal corporation shall hereinafter be called the "City ", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City has planned the improvement of MSAS 136 (W. 76th Street) from CSAH 17 (France Avenue) to Edinborough Way; and WHEREAS, the City will be expending Municipal State Aid Funds on the improvement of this Street; and WHEREAS, this improvement does not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the street approval of the proposed construction as a Municipal State Aid Street project must therefore be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions, and WHEREAS, the extent of these restrictions that would be a necessary prerequisite to the approval of this construction as a Municipal State Aid project in the City, has been determined. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the City shall ban the parking of motor vehicles on both sides of MSAS 136 (W. 76th Street) at all times. Motion for adoption of the resolutions was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolutions adopted. NO ACTION TAKEN ON PURCHASE OF WHITE OAKS LOTS: REFERRED TO MANAGER FOR MONITORING Manager Rosland reported that there has been no response to the City's offer extended to Richard J. Andron and Andron, Inc. to purchase Lot 9, White Oaks 2nd Addition and Lot 1, White Oaks 3rd Addition. Connor Schmid, acting in behalf of the White Oaks Improvement Association, has advised that the property has been formally deeded of record by the Monroes to Andron, Inc. and that the state deed tax stamps would indicate a sale price of $79,500. Mayor Richards reiterated to Mr. Schmid that the City was willing to commit $13,300 towards the purchase of the subject lots as proposed by the Association. However, not.having received a response from the present property owner, the Council would take no further action. Connor Schmid, commented that if the sale was a bonafide deal the developer has built in a $40,000 profit. There are some questions about the actual worth of the property. He suggested that one way to test that would be for the City to, by power of eminent domain, determine what it is worth. The City would not be committed to do anything until the matter would go to trial. Mr. Schmid added that the Association is continuing with their pledge drive to raise the $13,300 to match the commitment made by the City. Mayor Richards stated that the matter would be referred to the City Manager's office for monitoring. No formal action was taken. COUNCIL STUDY SESSION DATES TO BE CONFIRMED AT NEXT MEETING Mayor Richards stated that because of the late hour, the Agenda Item VII.H Confirm Dates for Council Study Sessions would be placed on the next agenda. *PETITION OF RESIDENTS OF VALLEY VIEV DRIVE/VIRGINIA AVENUE REFERRED TO ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FOR PROCESSING Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Smith to refer the petition from residents of Valley View Drive and Virginia Avenue concerning a drainage problem to the Engineering Department for processing. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. PETITION OF KATHRYN AND CONNOR SCHMID, 4711 MEADOW RD, FOR RETAINING WALL REFERRED TO ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FOR RECOMMENDATION Member Kelly made a motion to refer the petition of Kathryn and Connor Schmid, 4711 Meadow Road, for a wall to retain fill on the right of way of France Avenue at the rear of their property to the Engineering Department for review and processing. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENABLING STATUTES TO BE DISCUSSED AT NEXT MEETING Mayor Richards stated that because of the late hour, the Agenda Item IX.A. Local Government Enabling Statutes would be placed on the next agenda for discussion. MAYOR ASKS FOR COUNCIL MEMBER TO WELCOME CHEMICAL HEALTH WORKSHOP ATTENDEES AND POLITICAL CONVENTION ATTENDEES ON MAY 6 Mayor Richards explained that he had conflicts for May 6, the date of the Chemical Health Workshop and also a political convention in Edina. He asked the Council to let him know if they could substitute for him and welcome the attendees at these two meetings. POLICE DEPARTMENT COMPLIMENTED FOR TAGGING VEHICLES PARKED ILLEGALLY Member Rice complimented the Police Department for tagging vehicles parked illegall}i'at the Grandview Municipal Store and in getting the vehicles removed. COUNCIL MEMBERS' ATTENDANCE AT CONFERENCES TO BE DISCUSSED Member Paulus said she felt it was not good use of City money to send all five Council Members to various conferences each time. She commented that usually there are only a few topics that are of benefit and those could be shared with other Members by having only one or two Members attending. She said it was important that the Council attend and be visible, but questioned whether there should be a limit as to Members attending and suggested that perhaps they could rotate. Mayor Richards agreed that this was a valid concern and suggested that this be discussed at an upcoming Council Study Session as to a policy on Council attendance at outside meetings /conferences. COUNCIL'S ATTENTION DIRECTED TO REPORTS ON IMPACT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS ANd DEER SURVEY Manager Rosland called to the Council's attention two reports that had been sent out with the packets: 1) Impact of Tax Increment Financing Districts, and 2) Deer Survey. He said he hoped the information would be of benefit and would serve to answer questions that have been asked. RESOLUTION ADOPTED PROVIDING FOR ISSUANCE AND SALE OF HOUSING DEVELOPMENT REFUNDING REVENUE BONDS (EDINA PARK PLAZA): PUBLIC HEARING DATE SET The request for a proposed refunding of the Edina Park Plaza bonds was presented by Henry Hyatt, Executive Vice President, Edina Park Plaza of Edinborough. He explained the major features of the bond refunding as follows: 1. Major Impact - Reduces interest rate on mortgage from 10.5% to approximately 9.1 %. 2. Old bond holders paid off at 1008 of principal and interest on bonds. 3. Approximately 938 of new issue to be rated. 4. New rated bonds to be sold to institutions. 5. Eases financial burden from severely overbuilt senior housing market. 6. New bonds are not.a general or moral obligation of the City of Edina; issuance has no impact on Edina's general credit or taxing powers or position. 7. No change in 208 moderate income occupancy requirements or preference for Edina residents. 8. No additional city assistance, guarantees, etc. requested. 9. Interest Reduction Assistance Loan stays in place without change. 10. No change in ownership or management anticipated. No change in services or quality of Edina Park Plaza. Mr. Hyatt concluded with the aomment that the bond refunding would ease a tremendous financial stress condition and that he had no question about the ultimate success of the project. Following discussion and with no objection being heard, Member Rice introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO A DEVELOPMENT AND ITS FINANCING UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C; PROVIDING FOR APPROVAL OF DOCUMENTS AND ISSUANCE AND SALE OF HOUSING DEVELOPMENT.REFUNDING REVENUE BONDS, AND CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), as follows: Section 1. Recitals and Findings. 1.1 By the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended (the "Act "), the City is authorized to plan, administer, issue and sell revenue bonds or obligations to make or purchase loans to finance one or more multifamily. housing developments within its boundaries, which revenue bonds or obligations shall be payable solely from the revenues of the development. 1.2. The City has heretofore developed and, after due notice and public hearing, has adopted a housing plan (the "Plan ") under the Act. The Plan sets forth, among other things, the housing needs of the City and methods for meeting such needs. 1.3. The Act provides that the City may plan,.administer and make or purchase a loan or loans to finance one or more developments of the kinds described in Subdivisions 2, 3, 4 and 7 of Section '462C.05 of the Act, upon adoption of a program setting forth the information required by Subdivision 6 of Section 462C.05 of the Act, after a public hearing thereon, and upon approval by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (the "Agency "), as provided by Section 462C.04 of the Act. 1.4. This Council has heretofore received a proposal that the City finance the cost of a multifamily housing development under the Act, consisting of acquisition of land located at 7800 York Avenue in the City and the construction and equipping thereon of a residential rental facility containing approximately 203 housing units and including functionally related and subordinate facilities (the "Development "). 1.5. The City has heretofore caused to be prepared and, after due notice, public hearing and submission for review and comment, has adopted a program (the "Original Program ") under the Act relating to the Development. The Original . Program, as adopted on June 17, 1985, has been submitted to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency in accordance with Section 462C.05 of the Act for approval as provided in Section 462C.01 on the basis of considerations stated in Section 462C.04 of the Act, and is deemed approved under the provisions of said Section 462C.04, Subdivision 1. 1.6. Pursuant to the Original Program, the City has heretofore issued and sold its Housing Development Revenue Bonds (FHA Insured Mortgage Loan - Edina Park Plaza Project), Series 1985 (the "Prior Bonds "), and has used the net proceeds of the Prior Bonds to make a mortgage loan to Edina Park Plaza Associates Limited Partnership, an Illinois limited partnership (the "Developer "), to finance the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Development. The mortgage loan has been endorsed for mortgage loan insurance by the Federal Housing Administration of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. 1.7. Pursuant to covenants and restrictions entered into in connection with the Prior Bonds, the Development is required to be occupied for a specified period of time primarily by elderly persons and in part (at least 20 %) by persons and families of low and moderate income. 1.8. The construction and equipping of the Development have been completed, and the Development has been partially leased. Initial leasing projections have not been met, however, and the Developer is in default under the mortgage loan documents securing the Prior Bonds. 1.9. This Council has received a proposal from the Developer that the City refinance the cost of the Development by issuing its refunding revenue bonds in one or more series (the "Bonds "), for the purpose of refunding and redeeming the outstanding Prior Bonds, in connection with a proposed amendment of the mortgage loan heretofore made to the Developer and subject to agreement by the Developer to pay promptly amounts sufficient to pay debt service on the Bonds. 1.10. The City has caused to be prepared an amended program (the "Amended Program ") under the Act, pursuant to which it is proposed that the City issue the Bonds in one or more series and in a maximum aggregate amount of $17,500,000 to refund and redeem the Prior Bonds in connection with the proposed amendment of the mortgage loan and the refinancing of the Development. 1.11. The City has been advised by the Developer that conventional commercial financing is available to refinance capital costs of the Development only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the scope of the Development and the economic feasibility of operating the Development would be significantly affected, but with the aid of municipal financing the operation of the Development can be made more economically feasible. 1.12. This Council has been advised by representatives of the Developer and Dain Bosworth Incorporated, of Minneapolis, Minnesota (the "Underwriter "), that on the basis of information available to them and their discussions with the Developer and potential purchasers of tax - exempt bonds, the Bonds could be sold at favorable rates and terms to refinance the Development. 1.13. The full faith and credit of the City will not be pledged to or responsible for the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds. 1.14. The City has received drafts of a Trust Indenture, a Financing Agreement, and a Bond Purchase Agreement (collectively, the "City Financing Documents ") and a draft Preliminary Official Statement (the "Preliminary Official Statement ") in connection with the proposed issuance and sale of the Bonds, and has placed such documents on file in the office of the City Clerk. 1.15. It is hereby found, determined and declared, subject to the provisions of Section 2.6 of this resolution, as follows: (a) The Development will constitute a multifamily development under Section 462C.02, Subdivision 5 of the Act. The City is authorized to develop and finance the Amended Program by the authorization, issuance and sale of refunding revenue bonds or obligations payable solely from the revenues of the Amended Program and the Development. The purpose of the Development is and its effect will be to promote the public welfare and preserve the quality of life in the City by helping to maintain, provide and preserve adequate housing stock within the City and to assist persons of low and moderate income, or elderly persons, or both, to.obtain decent, safe and sanitary housing within the City. (b) Based upon representations by the Developer and its general partner, financing for the Development is not otherwise available to the Developer from private lenders upon terms and conditions which are affordable by the Developer, such financing being available only at a rate which, when combined with the cost of operating the Development as well as noneconomic factors, would impair the feasibility of the Development; the general partner of the Developer expects that the revenues to be produced by the rental of units in the Development will be sufficient to meet payments when due on the amended mortgage loan. (c) On the basis of the information given the City to date,'it appears that it would be desirable for the City to issue the Bonds under the provisions of the Act in the maximum aggregate principal amount of approximately $17,500,000 to refinance the Development and, in connection with the acquisition of the amended.mortgage loan, to refund and redeem the Prior Bonds. Section 2. Approval and Authorization. 2.1. The Amended Program is hereby approved, and it is hereby found and determined that it is not necessary to cause the Program to be submitted to the Agency for review and approval pursuant to Section 462C.04, Subdivision 2 of the Act. 2.2. Subject to the provisions of Section 2.6 of this resolution, it is hereby determined that it is desirable for the City to proceed with the issuance of the Bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $17,500,000, bearing interest at a rate per annum not to exceed 9.00 %, maturing not later than December 1, 2030, and bearing the further terms and conditions set forth in the Trust Indenture heretofore filed with the City (as the same may be amended or completed as hereinafter provided), and the execution and issuance of the Bonds is hereby approved subject to'the provisions of said Section 2.6. Subject to the provisions of said Section 2.6 and this Section 2.1, authority is hereby delegated to the Mayor and the City Manager of the City, acting jointly, to determine the aggregate principal amount of Bonds of each series to be issued, the maturities thereof and the rate or rates of interest payable thereon, and to cause the Bonds, to be executed, authenticated and delivered as provided in the Trust Indenture hereinafter approved. 2.3. Subject to the provisions of Section 2.6 of this resolution, the sale of the Bonds to the Underwriter is hereby approved. Subject to the provisions of Section 2.6 of this resolution, the form of the Bond Purchase Agreement heretofore filed with the City is hereby approved. The Mayor and the City Manager of the City are hereby authorized and directed, on behalf of the City, to execute the Bond Purchase Agreement in substantially the form hereby approved, but including such changes and completions thereof as may be approved by the Mayor, the City Manager and the City Attorney, the execution thereof to constitute conclusive evidence of the approval of such changes and completions. Authority is hereby delegated to the Mayor and the City Manager of the City, acting jointly, to determine the aggregate purchase price of the Bonds, provided that the aggregate compensation to the original purchaser of the Bonds (vhether in the form of a discount, fees or other compensation) shall not exceed an amount equal to 3.00% of the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds. 2.4. Subject to the provisions of Section 2.6 of this resolution, the forms of the City Financing Documents heretofore filed with the City are hereby approved. The Mayor and the City Manger of the City are hereby authorized and directed, on behalf of the City, to execute the Trust Indenture and the Financing Agreement in substantially the form hereby approved, but including such modifications, insertions and additions as are necessary and appropriate in their opinion and in the opinion of the City Attorney and consistent with the Act. The Mayor and the City Manager of the City are hereby further authorized to execute such additional agreements, documents and certificates in connection with the Bonds as may be necessary and appropriate in their opinion and in the opinion of the City Attorney and consistent with the Act. Copies of the Trust Indenture and the Financing Agreement and any such additional agreements, documents and certificates, when executed, shall be delivered, filed and recorded as provided therein. The execution of any of the City Financing Documents and any such additional agreements, documents and certificates by the appropriate officers of the City shall be conclusive evidence of the approval thereof by the City. 2.5. Subject to the provisions of Section 2.6 of this resolution, the distribution of a preliminary official statement and a final official statement with respect to the Bonds to prospective purchasers, in substantially the form heretofore filed with the City and with such changes, insertions, omissions and revisions as the Mayor, City Manager and City Attorney shall deem advisable, and the use thereof by the Underwriter in.connection with the offering of the Bonds are hereby authorized and approved. 2.6. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the adoption of this resolution shall not be deemed to establish a legal obligation on the part of the City or its City Council to issue or to cause the issuance of the Bonds or execute or deliver the City Financing Documents. The City retains the right in its sole discretion to withdraw from participation and accordingly not to issue the Bonds should the City at any time prior to the issuance determine that it is in the best interest of the City not to issue the Bonds, or should the parties to the transaction be unable to reach agreement as to the structuring of the financing or as to the terms and conditions of any of the documents required for the transaction or required by the City or the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina., Minnesota in connection with the transaction. All details of the issuance of the Bonds and the provisions for payment thereof shall be subject to any required review and approval of the Amended Program and may be subject to such further conditions as the City may specify. The Bonds, if issued, shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City, except the revenues of the Development specifically pledged to the payment thereof, and each Bond, when, as and if issued, shall recite in substance that the principal thereof, premium, if any, and interest thereon are payable solely from the revenues of the Development and property specifically pledged under the revenue agreement to the payment thereof, and shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation. All of the findings and approvals contained in Section 1 and 2 of this resolution are subject to review and confirmation by this Council following the public hearing called pursuant to Section 3 of this resolution, and to the final approval by resolution of this Council of the issuance of the Bonds and the execution and delivery of related financing documents. Section 3. Public Hearing. 3.1. Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and regulations promulgated thereunder, require that, prior to the issuance of the Bonds, this Council approve the Bonds after conducting a public hearing thereon. A public hearing on the proposal to finance the Amended Program through the issuance of the Bonds is hereby called and shall be held on Monday, May 1, 1989, at 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the City Hall. 3.2 The City Clerk shall cause notice of the public hearing to be published in the Minneapolis Star and Tribune, a newspaper of general circulation in the City, at least once not less than fifteen (15) prior to the date fixed for the public hearing. The notice to be published shall be in substantially the following form: (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55414 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City "), will meet at the City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota, on Monday, May 1,. 1989 at 7:00 p.m. to hold a public hearing on the proposed issuance of one or more series of refunding revenue bonds in a maximum aggregate principal amount of approximately $17,500,000 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended (the "Act "), to refinance an existing multifamily housing development to be occupied primarily by elderly persons (the "Project "). The Project consists of an apartment building containing approximately 203 rental housing units and including functionally related and subordinate .> facilities, is located at 7800 York Avenue in the City and if owned by Edina Park Plaza Associates Limited Partnership, an Illinois limited partnership. Any bonds or obligations of the City issued to refinance the Project will be payable solely from the revenues of the development and shall not constitute a debt of the City. All interested persons may appear at the hearing and present their views on the proposed issuance of the refunding revenue bonds. Interested persons may also submit written comments to the City Manager prior to the date set forth above for the public hearing. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk AMENDED PROGRAM FOR A MULTIFAMILY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C 1. The City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City ") has heretofore issued its $17,622,800 Housing Development Revenue Bonds (FHA Insured Mortgage Loan -Edina Park Plaza Project), Series 1985, originally dated as of October 1, 1985 (the "Prior Bonds "), the proceeds of which were used to make a mortgage loan to Edina Park Plaza Associates Limited Partnership, an Illinois limited partnership (the "Developer "), to finance the acquisition, construction and equipping of a multifamily residential rental facility, including functionally related and subordinate facilities (the "Development "), for occupancy primarily by elderly persons and in part by persons and families of low and moderate income. The Development is located at 7800 York Avenue in the City, and contains approximately 203 housing units, at least 20% of which will be rented to persons of "low and Moderate income ", under 103(b)(4)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended (the "Code "), and the Regulations thereunder. Initial leasing of the Development has not met projections and the Developer is in default under the mortgage loan documents securing the Prior Bonds. 2. Representatives of the Developer have,requested that the City issue one or more new series of refunding revenue bonds under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended (the "Act "), in a maximum aggregate principal amount of approximately $17,500,000 to refinance all or a portion of the Development and refund and redeem all or a portion of the Prior Bonds. Title to the Development would remain in the Developer, and the net proceeds of the refunding revenue bonds would be distributed to the owners of the Prior Bonds. The Developer would continue to own and operate the Development as a multifamily housing facility for rental primarily to elderly persons and in part to persons,of low and moderate income, pursuant to existing covenants and restrictions heretofore entered into in connection with the Prior Bonds. 3. The City's Housing Plan serves as a basis for the City's goal of providing a variety of housing stock throughout the City for persons residing in the City, including persons of low and moderate income. The Development to be refinanced pursuant to this Program has assisted or will assist the City in certain problems addressed in the Housing Plan, including (a) increasing available housing stock, and (b) providing decent, sanitary and affordable housing for residents of the City, including persons of low and moderate income and their families. 4. The Development will be a "multifamily housing development" within the meaning of Subd. 5 of 462C.05 of the Act. The income limitations set forth in Subd. 2 of 462C.05 of the Act will not apply to the Development since it will be located within a redevelopment project area under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 469 (formerly Chapter 462). In addition, as discussed in paragraph 1 of this Program, at least 20% of the units will be rented or available for rental to persons of low and moderate income; that is, with incomes not greater that 80% of the median family income as estimated by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development for the statistical area in which the City is located, currently approximately $33,850. 5. To refinance the Development and refund and redeem the Prior Bonds, the City intends to issue its refunding revenue bonds pursuant to the Act, in one or more series and in a maximum aggregate principal amount of approximately $17,500,000 (the Bonds). The City will lend the proceeds of the Bonds to the Developer pursuant to a revenue agreement in which the Developer agrees to make loan repayments sufficient to pay debt service on the Bonds. The Bonds will be a special, limited obligation of the City, payable solely from revenues derived from payments to be made by the Developer under the revenue agreement and any other sources specifically pledged to the Payment of the Bonds. The Bonds may be secured by a mortgage and security interest in the Development, or by some form of credit enhancement (which may include one or more letters of credit, insurance on the Mortgage loan or the Bonds), or by a combination of such security devices. Adopted this 17th day of April, 1989. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor Motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member Paulus and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards and the following voted against the same: None whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Smith for approval of payment of the following claims dated 4/17/89: General Fund $335,593.87, Art Center $3,184.25, Capital Fund $13,047.81, Golf Course Fund $19,059.13, Recreation Center Fund $113,716.24, Gun Range Fund $251.69, Edinborough Park $14,288.27, Utility Fund $29,497.78, Liquor Dispensary Fund $95,431.48, Construction Fund $605.00, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $23,070.52-, Total $647,746.04, and for confirmation of payment of Claims dated 3/31/89: General Fund $598,659.23, Art Center $610.93, Swimming Pool Fund $84.16, Golf Course Fund $13,588.01, Recreation Center Fund $12,800.12, Gun Range Fund $127.58, Edinborough Park $12,381.48, Utility Fund $22,988.46, Liquor Dispensary Fund $252,880.10, Total $914,120.07 Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. There being no further business on the Council agenda, Mayor Richards declared the meeting adjourned at 12:22 p.m. City Clerk E W- j. III. B. LOCATION MAP Consent Item LOT DIVISION NUMBER LOCATION LD -89- 4 Site of Centennial Lakes EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT Qom. LD -89 -4 South Edina Development Addition. Centennial Lakes Edina HRA and Laukka and Associates (NOTE: THIS ACTION IS NOT SUBJECT TO THE SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION MORATORIUM) Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the HRA is preparing to convey, to Laukka, the Phase II land for condominium development at Centennial Lakes. The proposed lot division provided the necessary legal description for conveyance of the property. Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommend approval. Commissioner Palmer moved to recommend approval. Commissioner Shaw seconded the motion. Ayes; Faust, Hale, McClelland, Palmer, Shaw, G. Johnson. Motion carried. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MAY 31, 1989 LD -89 -4 South Edina Development Addition. Centennial Lakes Edina HRA and Laukka and Associates (NOTE: THIS ACTION IS NOT SUBJECT TO THE SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION MORATORIUM) The HRA is preparing to convey, to Laukka, the Phase II land for condominium development at Centennial Lakes. The proposed lot division provided the necessary legal description for conveyance of the property. Recommendation Approval Q w it r7 M J If N Cc 00 Q � a N 0 to CV co r":- N h h 11 N 11 � !1 PROPOSED SUBDIVISION ' PLAT FOR THE HOMES OF CENTENNIAL LAKES S 00-14'09'" 100 00 " E 63.25 $9 w F 10 EDINBOROUGH LAND DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PLAT: LOT 1, BLOCK 2, SOUTH EDINA DEVELOPMENT ADDITION, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA. PLANNING � 0 ENG rxxv LAND SUIRVEYING BRV, INC. THRESHER SQUARE '700 THIRD STREET SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNr 55415 612/370 -0700 S 00°14'09" E 571.5R WAY 3 18 0 °115 j. a5 1'00 004'09" W H �a 708.83 C' S 00°14'09" E BUILDING ENVELOPE 181.21 T I Ili\ ' as aa 162.0 0 s 0 eaaaa� FOUNDATION °ol I °o LL 162.00 ( I 181.21 =1 THE HONES OF CENTENNIAL LAKES PHASE I CONDOMINIUM LAND DESCRIPTION All that part of LOT 1. BLOCK 2. SOUTH EDINA DEVELOPMENT ADDITION. according to the recorded plat thereof. Nenneptn County. Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of said LOT 1; thence on an assumed hearing of No 00 degrees 14 minutes 09 seconds West, along the easterly Itna of sal d LOT 1 for 100.00 feet; thence North la degrees 11 minutes 57 seconds East, along said easterly line for 47.23 feet; thence South a9 degrees 4S minutes SI seconds West for 14a.64 feet; thence North 45 degrees 14 minuta 09 seconds West for 35.67 feet; thence North 00 degrees 14 minu- tes 09 seconds Yeat for 37.79 feet; thence South 89 degrees 4S minutes 51 aecontla West tar 143.93 feet to the westerly line of said LOT 1; thence South OD degrees 14 minutes 09 seconds East, along said westerly line for 146.64 feet; thence South 3S degrees 08 minutes 34 seconds East for 154.42 feet to the southerly line of sold Lot 1; thence North S6 degrees IS minutes 46 seconds East, along Bald southerly 11ne for 5.00 feet; thence easterly for 222.69 feet along said southerly Ifne on a tangential curve concave to the south, radius 377.50 feet and central angle 33 degrees 47 minutes 55 i seconds, to the point of beginning. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR L.A. LAUKKA DEVELOPMENT CO. 0 858.20 - 89.60 C4� Ld _ Jy In O O o r i a � � O�`v OQ Z Q� EDINBOROUGH WAY S 00014'09" E "S 1 0. $ - 274.80 -16 02 1" o oo a 857.61 56.99 0 °o W - ' 162.00 - - - ij 23.20 4Z m _ �+ 857.04 `.`` 0 862.08 ° °857.50 Fw o - L35 FT. BUILDING SETBACK LINE:m zm IN aa,o E'Iy line Lotl� D 25 861.29 162.00 857.98 2 -�' Z 1 r, \ 77.00 859.242 N 00014'09" W ' LL1 V O LO cV 0 O 00 Z PROPOSED CONDOMINIUM BUILDING THE HOMES OF CENTENNIAL LAKES °° l j ALL BUILDING CORNER OFFSET HUBS ARE SET FROM �- - FOUNDATION LINE - - - THE FOUNDATION ENVELOPMENT. PROPOSE � BIT. SURFACE according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, 20.00 described as follows: * DENOTES OFFSET HUB awl 0 n 854 `� o easterly line of said LOT 1 for 100.00 feet; thence North 18 degrees 11 PROPOSED GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION = 849.80 FT, minutes 57 seconds East, along said easterly line for 47.23 feet to the N I %� ) BENCHMARK: TOP NUT OF HYDRANT NORTH SIDE OF 76TH STREET AT EDINBOROUGH WAY, seconds West for 187.78 feet; thence.North 89 degrees 45 minutes 51 ELEVATION = 859.20 FT, seconds East for 25.93 feet; thence North 00 degrees 14 minutes 09 - seconds West for 77.00 feet; thence North 89 degrees 45 minutes 51 T 1 71.00 71.00 ` V 1858.50 857.04 Z0 r . 0 858.79 $ °14'09' 857.41 �OG D N 00 W� Revised 5 -31 -89 1) Missing call in description 2) Add distances, bearing and labels to THE HOMES OF CENTENNIAL LAKES CONDOMINIUM BUILDING II LAND DESCRIPTION ALL BUILDING CORNER OFFSET HUBS ARE SET FROM THE FOUNDATION ENVELOPMENT. All that part of LOT 1. BLOCK 2, SOUTH EDINA DEVELOPMENT ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT described as follows: * DENOTES OFFSET HUB Commencing at the southeast corner of said LOT 1; thence on an assumed bearing of North 00 degrees 14 minutes 09 seconds West, along the PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION = 859.80 FT. easterly line of said LOT 1 for 100.00 feet; thence North 18 degrees 11 PROPOSED GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION = 849.80 FT, minutes 57 seconds East, along said easterly line for 47.23 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence South 89 degrees-45 minutes 51 seconds West for 148.64 feet; thence North 45 degrees 14 minutes 09 BENCHMARK: TOP NUT OF HYDRANT NORTH SIDE OF seconds West for 35.67 feet; thence North 00 degrees 14 minutes 09 76TH STREET AT EDINBOROUGH WAY, seconds West for 187.78 feet; thence.North 89 degrees 45 minutes 51 ELEVATION = 859.20 FT, seconds East for 25.93 feet; thence North 00 degrees 14 minutes 09 - seconds West for 77.00 feet; thence North 89 degrees 45 minutes 51 seconds East for 153.00 feet to said easterly line of LOT 1; thence South 00 degrees 14 minutes 09 seconds East, along said easterly line for 274.80 feet; thence South 18 degrees 11 minutes 57 seconds West, along said easterly line for 16.02 feet to the point of beginning. Revised 5 -31 -89 1) Missing call in description 2) Add distances, bearing and labels to f �1 o e ch a° REPORT /RECOMMENDATION X888 To: Kenneth Rosland Agenda Item #!-,—,. C. From: Craig Larsen Consent ❑ - Information Only ❑ Date: June 5, 1989 Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject:, s- 88 -12, Irwin x I To Council Addition Action ❑ Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Approve Final Plat subject to subdivision dedication based on a value of $60,000. Info /Background: The proposal is not subject to the single family subdivision moratorium since it received preliminary approval prior to the adoption of the moratorium. i Subdivision No. _5- e8 - ( z-_ SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT TO: Planning Commission Park Board Environmental Quality Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBDIVISION NAME: LAND SIZE: ' N el)�) ` LAND VALUE: 00 C� (By: Date: The developer of this subdivision has been required to A. grant an easement over part of the land B. dedicate % of the land C. donate $ as a fee in lieu of land As a result of applying the following policy: A. Land Required (no density or,intensity may be used for the first 5% of land dedicated) 1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition beneficially expands the park. El 2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park. rt 3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream. 4. If property is necessary for storm water holding or will be dredged or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds. 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his- toric value. F1 6. B. Cash Required El1. In all other instances than above. 2. 2RELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR IRWIN FIRST ADDITION. Following presentation and f discussion on the request for preliminary plat approval for Irwin First Addition q and motion of the Council to take action thereon following item III.D on the r ) $ agenda, the Council again reviewed the square footage of the lots in the G� surrounding neighborhood of the proposed subdivision. Wally Irwin, proponent argued that the proposed new lots visually would look the same from the street as e Y other lots along Valley View Road and that the new lots are within 3,000 square feet of the most recent lots that were subdivided in the area. Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FOR IRWIN FIRST ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota that that certain plat entitled "IRWIN FIRST ADDITION ", platted by Wally Irwin Construction, Inc., and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of December 5, 1988, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval. Member Kelly said that she had made the motion for discussion purposes and added that she felt Mr. Irwin could construct one really nice home on the subject property. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Mayor Courtney. r Following further discussion on the proposed subdivision, Mayor Courtney called for rollcall vote on the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Courtney Nays: Turner Resolution adopted. Member Smith made the comment to reluctant ayes, that he wanted Mr discussion prior to this action, of lots in the City has been of 4 0 t Mr. Irwin that the vote included a couple of . Irwin to understand the significance of the and that the Council feels that the subdivision concern to the Council for some time. MINUTES OF.THE REGULAR MEETING CF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL DECEMBER 5, 1988 Answertn.; rollcail were Members Kelly, Smith, Turner 11d ':ct_ nr Courtnev. CENTENNIAL UPDATE PRESENTED. Betty Hemstad, Co -Chair of the 1988 Centennial, commented that the Centennial Year was coming to a close and expressed thanks on behalf of herself and Kay Bach, Co- Chair, for the opportunity to serve the City. She said that a lot of citizens had worked on the Centennial and that there is a stronger feeling of community now than before the Centennial Year. The main event for November was the Edina Centennial Interfaith Celebration of Thanksgiving and Community on November 20 held at the Edina Community Center. On November 13 some of the churches held Centennial celebrations of their own. Kay Bach elaborated on the Founders' Day program to be held on December 12 at City Hall. The postal service will hand cancel mail using a Centennial cancellation from noon to 5 p.m. and the evening program is scheduled for 7:30 p.m. During the day the School District will be celebrating by serving Centennial birthday cake to all school children. Also, the Centennial tree that was planted last May will be dedicated at the evening program. On December 30 a grand finale party is planned at Edinborough Park in appreciation for all the volunteers who worked on the Centennial events. She said that Centennial memorabilia will be sold at The Galleria the weekend of December 10 -11 and suggested memorabilia items for Christmas gifts. A financial report is expected to be completed during March, 1989. With donations still coming in, together with the donation from the Rotary of $25,000, it is hoped that over $200,000 will be collected for the lasting memorial. Following the Centennial report, the Council Members thanked Co- Chairs Hemstad and Bach for their extraordinary efforts for the Centennial. JIM SINGLETON COMMENDED ON RECEIVING AWARD OF MERIT. Manager Rosland advised that Jim Singleton, Edina Paramedic /Firefighter, was appointed to the Fire Department on December 6, 1976 and was promoted to Paramedic on December 5, 1980. During this past month he received an "Award of Merit" at the Fifth Annual Public Safety Awards Dinner. This award was presented for his dedication and initiative in the development and implementation of the first State of Minnesota Emergency Medical Services Peer Counseling Program to deal with critical stress, debriefing, training and guidance. The existence of a peer counseling program encourages emergency medical service personnel to help themselves recognize and resolve their personal or work related problems. Manager Rosland commended Mr. Singleton for his dedicated service to the City and presented him with a silver pen bearing the Edina logo. Members of the Council also expressed their appreciation to him. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED. Notion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Turner to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented, vith the exception of the removal of item VIII.D. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Smith,.Turner, Courtney Motion carried. *MINUTES OF JOINT COUNCIL/HRA MEETING'AND REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 12, 1988 APPROVED. Notion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Turner to approve the minutes of the Joint Council /HRA Meeting and Regular Meeting of September 12, 1988. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. ACTION ON PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR IRWIN FIRST ADDITION DELAYED UNTIL AFTER SITEM III.D ON AGENDA. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Craig Larsen recalled that the request for preliminary plat approval for Irwin First Addition was continued at the Council Meeting of November 21, 1988 to allow the proponent time to provide further information on questions that had been raised at the public hearing. The subject property is located on the east side of Valley View Road between Moccasin Valley Road and Bror Road. He advised that the proponent has submitted a site plan for Council's review showing the proposed location of driveways, pads for the proposed homes, and drainage. At the last meeting there was some discussion about sharing a common driveway. At staff's suggestion the driveways have been separated and have been moved to the south side of the lots to create the maximum distance from the interesection of Valley View Road and Dakota Trail. The plan also illustrates the proposed ultimate drainage pattern for the development which has been reviewed by and is acceptable to the City Engineer. At the last meeting the Council had asked the staff to review the sizes of the lots in the surrounding vicinity that were used for comparision purposes. The average size of the lots used along Valley View Road were somewhat over 20,000 square feet in area; the average size for all the lots surveyed is somewhat over 22,000 square feet. The proposed new lots would be in excess of 13,000 square feet. Planner Larsen said that in staff's opinion, and reinforced by the recommendation of the Community Development and Planning Commission, these lots compare very favorably on lot width and that the size of many of the unusually shaped lots in the vicinity is gained by the extra depth that many of them possess. Planner Larsen concluded that that was the reason for staff's recommending approval for lots that are significantly smaller r, , than lots in the general neighborhood. Wally Irwin, proponent, then preseuzaa colored graphic showing elevations of the houses he proposed to develop on the two lots. He explained that he planned to keep the existing rock retaining wall in the front to preset-7e the existing look and that the structures now on the property would be removed. The proposou ariveways have been moved to the southern most point on each lot so that they are located away from the curve on Valley View Road. Some of the existing trees would be relocated on the site. Mr. Irwin said that he had called on the surrounding neighbors and had showed the site plan to them. Their reaction was 1008 approval as indicated by their signatures on the plot at the locations where they live. He concluded by stating that he felt it would be a big improvement to the neighborhood and that the residents in the neighborhood all felt the same way. Member Smith asked Mr. Irwin to speak to the topography in the back of the lots. Mr. Irwin said that he did not plan to change any of the topography in the wooded area in the rear; that there is an existing swale for drainage north to Valley View that will not be disturbed. Member Smith stated that-he was still bothered by the proposed lot sizes but that he appreciated the effort by the proponent in presenting the proposed footprint of the houses and showing the plan to the neighbors. Also, that the divided driveways are better from the standpoint of street traffic. At the request of Member Kelly, Planner Larsen reviewed the sizes of the lots in the area which were used for comparison and that were directly related to the proposed subdivision. Member Turner commented that lot sizes were also a concern to her and that one thing the Council looks at in trying to make decisions on this kind of request is character and symmetry of the neighborhood. One measure of that is the lot size compared to others in the area. She said she felt that the difference between 13,700 square feet and either 20,300 or 22;000+ is significant and greater than she could accept. Therefore, she said that she could not support the request. Member Kelly made a motion that action on the request for preliminary plat approval for Irwin First Addition be taken following item III.D (Final Rezoning and Final Plat Approval - Erhardt Addition) on the agenda. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. than lots in the general neighborhood. Wally Irwin, proponent, then presenzaa i colored graphic showing elevations of the houses he proposed to develop on the two lots. He explained that he planned to keep the existing rock retaining wall in the front to preserve the existing look and that the structures now on the property would be removed: The proposea ariveways have been moved to the southern most point on each lot 'so that they are located away from the curve on Valley View Road. Some of the existing trees would be relocated on the site. Mr. Irwin said that he had called on the surrounding neighbors and had showed the site plan to them. Their reaction was 100% approval as indicated by their signatures on the. plot at the locations where they live. He concluded by stating that he felt it would be a big improvement to the neighborhood and that the residents in the neighborhood all felt the same way. Member Smith asked Mr. Irwin to speak to the topography in the back of the lots. Mr. Irwin said that he did not plan to change any of the topography in the wooded area in the rear; that there is an existing swale for drainage, north to Valley View that will not be disturbed. Member Smith stated that he was still bothered by the proposed lot sizes but that he appreciated the effort by the proponent in presenting the proposed footprint of the houses and showing the plan to the neighbors. Also, that the divided driveways are better from the standpoint of street traffic. At the request of Member Kelly, Planner Larsen reviewed the sizes of the lots in the area which were used for comparison and that were directly related to the proposed subdivision. Member Turner commented that lot sizes were also a concern to her and that one thing the Council looks at in trying to make decisions on this kind of request is character and symmetry of the neighborhood. One measure of that is the lot size compared to others in the area. She said she felt that the difference between 13,700 square feet and either 20,300 or 22,000+ is significant and greater than she could accept. Therefore, she said that she could not support the request. Member Kelly made a motion that action on the request for preliminary plat approval for Irwin First Addition be taken following item III.D (Final Rezoning and Final Plat Approval - Erhardt Addition) on the agenda. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. 6t% aL � I 1\ IPJ\ ( LOT DETAIL ./15-38 - /��— 88'49, 3O„ w/O i ` I HOUSE Ai '- _ 1 �= .PAD--.. s 1 9a (Ti , ( 91.0 ,yI GQr. Q cr- 1'3-1. ()0 Deep 3 C r I t ti Rato „'� 0 1 w wail �� ` I `\ ` HOUSE \PAD 12 G q � \ \ \ \ � �• / e ^� I� ON \ \ \ 890.0 New \ �a ga�.q G�`. 9 �; \ _ Wall 9 s c - - ---� i 1 N/8&0/49' 30” El W J 1 L_ RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL FOR.IRWIN ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "IRWIN ADDITION ", platted by Wally Irwin Construction, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of June 5, 1989, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. ADOPTED this 5th day of June, 1989. STATE. OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution is a true and correct copy of the resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of June 5, 1989 and.as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 8th day of June, 1989. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk e A. /1N�141"'rA,' e En .�0 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION lase To: Kenneth Rosland Agenda Item # III. D. From: Craig Larsen Consent ❑ - Information Only ❑ Date: June 5, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: P -89 -2, Final El To Council Development Plan SuperAmerica Action ❑ Motion 5205 Vernon Avenue 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Approval of Final Development Plan subject to: - Dedication of Link Road right -of -way - Vacation of Vernon Avenue right -of -way - Acceptable landscaping and grading plans Info /Background: The request was initially heard by the Council on May 15, 1989, and the hearing was continued to the June 5, 1989, meeting. The Planning Commission reconsidered the revised proposal at its May 31, 1989, meeting. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the revised plan. u� P -89 -2 SuperAmerica Final Development Plan 5205 Vernon Avenue Mr. Larsen explained to the Commission the proponents, SuperAmerica, have submitted a revised plan. The plan proposes to move both the pump island and building easterly on the site. He added the Link Road curb cut is also moved to the east to work with the relocated pump island. Mr. Larsen pointed out the revised plan allows for additional on -site stacking off of the Vernon Avenue access. Mr. Larsen said the revised plan results in a building setback of approximately 18 feet from the northerly property line and five feet from the easterly property line. Mr. Larsen noted that when the property lines are not the boundary of a commercial district setback requirements do not apply. Thus, no variances are required. Mr. Larsen told the Commission the only variance required is for the drive aisle along Link and Vernon Avenue where a 20 foot setback is required. The plan has a five foot setback. Mr. Roman Mueller, representing SuperAmerica was present Commissioner Faust asked Mr. Hoffman if he anticipates a problem with snow removal on service road in front of the car wash and medical clinic. Mr. Hoffman responded that he anticipates no problem with snow removal on that road. He pointed out there are other areas within the City that are similar. He noted the close proximity of this site to the public works building allows for early snow removal service. Commissioner G. Johnson questioned the length of the deceleration lane to SuperAmerica and etc. going east on Vernon Avenue. Mr. Hoffman said the length of the deceleration lane is adequately designed to provide proper deceleration to Amoco, Link Road, SuperAmerica and Jerrys, adding technically, several 100 feet in length. Mr. Hoffman went on to explain that he feels the presented plan is very efficient. He pointed out, with the aide of graphics, that traffic will flow along Vernon Avenue and in and out of the SuperAmerica site efficiently with the proposed road improvements and proper signalization. He explained that the traffic signal at the Link Road/Vernon Avenue intersection will remain continuously green for Vernon Avenue vehicles until vehicle stacking occurs on Link Road or on the Vernon Terrace exit. Mr. Hoffman noted the presented plan has been reviewed and approved by BRW, Inc., Hennepin County and City Staff. Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Hoffman for the road width at the narrowest point on Link Road. Mr. Hoffman said at its narrowest point Link Road is between 36 -39 feet. Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Hoffman to speculate how many cars could be stacked on Link Road adequately. Mr. Hoffman said between 5 -6 cars. Commissioner McClelland said at the last meeting she was very much opposed to the proposal. She indicated Mr. Hoffman has addressed her concerns adequately, adding she supports the presented proposal. Commissioner McClelland questioned the route buses would take. Mr. Hoffman said the proposal is to have a one way bus loop turn around on Eden Avenue. The buses will be parked west bound instead of their present east bound parking. Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Hoffman if he feels there is a need for another traffic signal along Vernon.Avenue. Mr. Hoffman said in his opinion a traffic signal at the main Jerry's entrance may be warranted. He pointed out the County .controls Vernon Avenue, and they will make any decision on if a signal is needed there. Commissioner Faust said she feels the parking of vehicles in front of the SuperAmerica station at the present time is unsafe. She wondered if the proposed plan addresses this problem. Mr. Larsen explained that at the present time the SuperAmerica station has vehicle parking in the rear. He added people ignore this who want to quickly park /stop, and park in the front of the station because it is more convenient. This causes congestion because the station was not designed for this type of parking use. The proposed plan alleviates this problem because there is no rear parking and adequate parking is located in the front of the station. Commissioner Hale asked the representative from SuperAmerica, Roman Mueller, if the proposed store is larger than the previously submitted store size? Mr. Mueller said the presently proposed store size is 40 X 60 versus the previously submitted 36 X 64. A brief discussion ensued with Commission Members expressing approval for the proposed project. Commissioner Palmer moved to recommend approval of the revised Final Development Plan. Commissioner Shaw seconded the motion. Ayes; Faust, Hale, Palmer, Shaw, McClelland, G. Johnson. Motion carried. .F Nc• SITE y W ar — PROPO O PROPERTT LIRE I W EXISTING PROPERTY LIRE S MOWG SETBACK - > � It / I SI• f ' � \ ; ,Ilp 9TATIOMIBIVRE I I I I \ +47 \ TRASH ENCL. C +Npn� y PA . Sp ®y' y� 7,- �� yB b RETAIMRG WALL PROPOSED C.B- VICE • NEW APPROACI ppOPOSED S' CORC. SIDEWALK BV C1,11 . SER ROARo \ DN SCALE:1'.7I• -I' �g1r4A.lt71 lip • • ��bRppM��O� �eea REPORT /RECOMMENDATION CONTINUED FROM 5/15/89 To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # IV.A.& B. From: Francis Hoffman Consent ❑ City Engineer Information Only ❑ Date: 5 June, 1989 t Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Vacation Hearing - [XI To Council Portion of Frontage Road Adjacent to Action Motion Superamerica on Vernon Avenue Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: (By Resolution) A. Vacate area of frontage road and adjacent to Superamerica as depicted in attached Exhibit A subject to condition of right -of -way being granted on the west side of Superamerica per Exhibit A. (By Motion) B. Waive $3,000.00 requirement on vacating frontage road. Info /Background: The vacation hearing is part of the project in the Grandview area approved by City Council earlier. The project requires additional right -of -way on the Link Road side of Superamerica to properly reconstruct the Eden - Link to Vernon section of the roadway. The attached exhibit shows in three pages the areas to be exchanged, the existing conditions, and the new street overlaying the existing conditions. The proposal is to vacate the necessary area on the - frontage road to accomplish project and receive from Superamerica the necessary right -of -way in exchange. The new intersection at Vernon and Link Road would be signalized with an auxiliary eastbound right lane being constructed on Vernon from west of Link thru the intersection and the right turn lane would end as it turns into Jerrys most westerly driveway. Report /Recommendation Vacation Hearing - Portion of Frontage Road Adjacent to Superamerica on Vernon Avenue Page Two Additionally, the vacation of the portion of frontage road would have required a pay back to the City of $3,000.00 if we were vacating the area without any conditions. However, in this current scenario, we would be exchanging areas and would recommend waiving the $3,000.00 pay back As such, staff recommends the actions listed under the recommendations. I 6� 9f ' , cn „ m C' D CI7 n \ D \ m \ o = EXHIBIT A VERS�N ASE m AREA TO BE VACATED AREA TO BE ACQUIRED \ ` QlIGN 4! '% ti \QpF ®o ce K C �r /pp.\ OMM a° f EDINA SENIORS MOUSING Vernon Avenue ul lu I O AW 1Y! 7N[LT[R E. I FILL [R o, G VENT 0 $UPERAYERICA 0. V , JUNIPERS PRO PAN[ 1 ' 4!* - O TANK \SIGN A4* O <` 7 \ V \ \ 7p F3 mr +Ot. L x_cy j� } P.C.I + GD rt LINK SAW CUT Ce ° R = 330.61' INSTAL V LlE GUT, — ' SAW CUT E 0 15'R MATCH EX. T =50. INSTALL ALLEY GU Ce „ + ENTRANC m. H. 220' T SuRvEY 6 6 5 IS R C.B. } 30 � 30 30'R R 15'R ps1GN � Q /•26 w + 30, e.B. \ (�' P 5 R s1 as Gil ° C=====:D 7 R Qei ,� �• G VENT +248 SUPERAY EFICA /O; e / 3 � 0 P. 3 ./ IN ST LL LANNON STONE WALL pOT. II 5.13 a EDEN AVE- CONN Ns 4. TANK LINK RD. P.O.C. 18+ 12• .. O� \ c G �} oo ° LINK RD. _ O .9 0 R =215.00 0 3 2 �s \ L = 232.66' TL Cr/ - y O i + C!, \ NEW a o W T =1291 010' �� \ ` ?� \ G 3 cAll �v y�• \h 0 g �� / co OTL 9� x \O• s� � ,C• t+'p Q' QO/ P �O a REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00 DATE. '2 June, 1989 AGENDA ITEM VI- ,K- ITEM DESCRIPTION: Traffic Paint Striper Truck Companv Amount of Quote or &d 1. Linear Dynamics, Inc. 1. $ 66,450.00 2. Rufferidge Johnson 2. $ 74,140.00 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Linear Dynamics, Inc. $ 66,450.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This piece of equipment replaces Unit 25 -438, a 1970 model M -10 master striper unit. The purchase will be funded from Public Works Equipment Replacement budget and was-a part of the planned 1989 purchases. The unit will have a heated paint system which allows us to paint much earlier in the spring and later in the fall. Sign ure The Recommended bid is within budget not wi Public Works — Streets bu allin, FNnce Director enneth Rosland, City Mana °4 Hr 1 =; 'E REQUEST FOR PURCHASE I:e y TO: Mayor and City Council .FROM: Ted Paulfranz, Fire Chief VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000 DATE May 30, 1989 ITEM DESCRIPTION: 1990, 4 -door sedan Company 1. Polar Chevrolet 2. Suburban Chevrolet 3. Harold Chevrolet 4. 5. AGENDA ITEM VI. s Amount of Quote or Bid 1, $10,689.00 2. $10,650.00 3, $11,012.93 4. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Suburban Chevrolet; 1990 Chevrolet Lumina 4 -door sedan, for $10,650.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This purchase is a replacement for fire administrative car (Vehicle #27 -171). This vehicle, (Chief's car), was damaged beyond repair, resulting from a traffic accident occurring April 19, 1989. Estimated cost for repairs was $7,400, and salvage value on the vehicle was bid at $1,608. My recommendation is to replace the vehicle. Signature The Recommended bid is FIRE Department within budget not withi bud �t r Kenneth Rosl d City Director THOMSEN NYBECK JOHNSON BOUQUET VAN VALKENBURG OHNSTAD & SNUTH, P.A. Agenda Item VII.A LAW OFFICES SUITE 600. EDINBOROUGH CORPORATE CENTER EAST 3300 EDINBOROUGH WAY. MINNEAPOLIS (EDINA), MINNESOTA 55435 (612) 835 -7000 • FAX: (612) 835 -9450 GLENN G. NYBECK DONALD D. SMITH OF COUNSEL: GORDON V. JOHNSON MARSH J. HALBERG JACK W. CARLSON JOHN K. BOUQUET WILLIAM E. SJOHOLM RICHARD D. WILSON, P.A. JAMES VAN VALKENBURG HERBERT P. LEFLER, III HELGE THOMSEN, RETIRED MARK G. OHNSTAD DENNIS M. PATRICK PHILIP SIEFF June 2, 1989 The Honorable Frederick Richards and Members of Edina -City Council RE: June 5th Meeting At your June 5th meeting the representatives of the Edina Art Center will be before you regarding a potential expansion and remodeling of the Art Center. On May 9th we met with and presented our proposal to the Park Board. They unanimously endorsed the same. Mr. Christianson, as chair of that group will also attend your June 5th meeting. I am enclosing a brochure explaining a need for and the proposed plan which you may review. It is also our suggestion that several of us will be available at the Art Center that evening at 6 PM for you to not only see, but to inspect the Art Center and to see where some of these changes will fit in. No need to reply. At your meeting Art Dickey will present the proposal from a conceptual standpoint as the architect who has been working on this, and we will then attempt to answer any of your questions. Certainly if there are any questions in the interim on this I would appreciate your call. rames Van Valkenburg, Chair Edina Art Center Advisory Board JVV:jd Encl. 0 w oer� En ie V less REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor and City Council From: Bob Kojetin, Director Park & Recreation Dept. Date: June 1, 1989 Subject: EDINA ART CENTER EXPANSION Agenda Item #VILA Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: MOTION FROM PARK BOARD: Jean Rydell MOVED TO USE $200,000 FROM THE DEVELOPERS FUND AND TO PROCEED WITH THE ART CENTER EXPANSION AS PROPOSED. $50,000 WILL BE PAID BACK FROM ART CENTER DONATIONS_WITHIN-A PERIOD OF FIVE YEARS. $50,000 WILL BE PAID BACK FROM THE PARK CAPITAL FUND BETWEEN 1991 AND 1993.• THE DEVELOPERS FUND WILL BE DEPLETED BY $100,000. Bill Jenkins seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Info /Background: During the past two "years, a special expansion committee of the Art Center Board chaired by Peter R. Spokes has been studying the expansion of the Edina Art Center. At the April Art Center Board meeting, a recommendation was made to proceed with the expansion of the Edina Art Center for the construction of two new classrooms and a re- organization of the office and gallery areas. The Art Center Board also made a recommendation that a presentation be made to the Park Board for the expansion of the Art Center. At the May Park Board meeting, the Art Center Chair and the expansion committee made their presentation of the expansion. The Park Board accepted the presentation and is recommending to the Council for approval to go ahead with this project. In summary, the expansion will cost $200,000. The breakdown is as follows: - $100,000 from the developers fund - 50,000 from donations raised by the Art Center - 50,000 from the park capital fund scheduled for 1991 -93. The Park Board's recommendation is to go ahead with the whole project of $200,000 from the developers fund. Over the next five years, the Art Center will raise a minimum of $10,000 per year to pay back the developers fund. The capital funding will also be taken from the developers fund at this time and then in 1991 -93, the park capital fund will repay the developers fund. As of January 1, 1989, there is $405,000 in the developers fund. The bottom line is the developers fund will be depleted by $100,000. EDINA PARK BOARD 7:30 p:m. May 9, 1989 Edina Art Center MEMBERS PRESENT: Bob Christianson, Jim Fee, Jean Rydell, Mac Thayer, Pat Vagnoni, Bill Jenkins, Andy Montgomery MEMBERS ABSENT: Bill Lord, Don Wineberg, Scott Johnson STAFF PRESENT: Bob Kojetin, Diana Hedges, Bill Bach, Stacey Kness OTHERS PRESENT: Jim Van Valkenburg, Art Dickey Bob Christianson called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. 1. APPROVAL OF APRIL MINUTES Jean Rydell MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE APRIL 11, 1989, MEETING. Mac Thayer seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. 2. CENTENNIAL LAKES UPDATE Mr. Kojetin indicated construction has not begun on the park yet. Phase I of the project consists of the theater, medical office, retail area, and residential area. Grading and construction of housing is going on now. If everything goes right, Minnesota Way will be opened May 15. West 76th Street will be closed and construction could be completed around November 1 including the bridge and road. Also included in Phase I is Parklawn up to the bridge. The start date for Phase II has not been discussed. Phase I of the park design includes a hard shoreline (concrete wall) on the west side of the lake, the lake, and a temporary shoreline on the east side of the lake. As of July 1, the whole park area should be graded; and by August, the whole lake should be graded. The floor plan is complete for the park building, and the exterior design is now being completed and will be brought to the Park Board. Mr. Jenkins asked how many stories the townhomes have. Mr. Kojetin said the are two -story buildings very similar to Edinborough. Mrs. Vagnoni asked if the water in the lake will be natural or if it will be brought in. Mr. Kojetin said the water is run -off from the Southdale area and will be channelled into the lake and then into Nine Mile Creek. Presently, the water is going to Adams Park in Richfield then pumped into storm sewers to go into Nine Mile Creek. Mr. Bach said Centennial Lakes Park will be administered by the current Edinborough Park staff. Hopefully the present Edinborough staff could increased by one person. Mr. Kojetin said we will add more staff as far as maintenance. The trees in the bridge area will be clumps of green ash and in the medians will be shrub roses. There will also be some formal flower areas on the hard shore side of the lake. Mr. Kojetin hopes to bring more information to the Park Board throughout the summer and fall as it becomes available. 3. ART CENTER EXPANSION PROPOSAL Mr. Kojetin'gave some background of the Art Center expansion program. During 1988 a committee was organized headed by Peter R. Spokes to look at the expansion of the Art Center. Because of its tremendous growth in the past few years and the increased revenue, the Art Center board and the staff feel that it is time that an expansion - 1 - J, program should be looked at in the overall use of the Art Center building. Mr. Kojetin indicated that the Art Center board had reviewed the recommendation and wanted to now present the expansion program to the Park Board for continued recommendations to the Council for final approval. At this time, Mr. Kojetin introduced the Art Center board Chair, Mr. Jim Van Valkenburg, to expand on the recommendation for improvement to the Art Center. , Mr. Van Valkenburg indicated the Art Center has been challenged by the Mayor to become more economic and break even. However, there are many problems: the need for more classroom space; the need for handicap access; ventilation; more gift gallery space; more office space for the manager; more parking. The Art Center Board is hopefully recommending capital from the developers fund. Mr. Van Valkenburg introduced Mr. Art Dickey, a member of the building committee. Mr. Dickey went over the preliminary conceptual drawings. The expansion includes: Upstairs - change present reception area into manager's office area and meeting room - excavate gift shop floor to garage level for handicap access - remodel present garage area into an office, sales, and gift area Downstairs - create a painting gallery approximately 900 square feet with sloping north window - create sculpture studio approximately 900 square feet with windows opening into sculpture court Mrs. Vagnoni asked if pottery is downstairs all ready. Mr. Dickey said it is, and it will not be disturbed by the addition. Mr. Dickey stated as plans are fine tuned, the cost will be fine tuned. The cost i. presently figured per square foot. Mr. Christianson asked if it is recommended to be done all at once or will it have be a phase project. Mr. Dickey said it could be a three -phase project, although it will cost less to do it all at once. The Art Center Board recommends the whole project be done at once. Mrs. Vagnoni asked if the current classes would be canceled to do some of the construction. Mr. Dickey said yes, some classes will have to move somewhere else temporarily. This work would be done in a sequence in the hope of not shutting things down as much as possible. Diana said there are times when the upstairs room is not being used and can have a class up there. Mr. Fee asked about the sequence of funds coming in to the Art Center. It appears that the donations could come in at different times. Diana said there are events going on all year that bring in $20,000 per year. Mr. Christianson asked if there is a way for the City to advance the funds and have the Art Center pay them back within a three to four year period. Mr. Kojetin said as of January 1, 1989, there is $405,000 in the developers fund that is not earmarked at this time. We have discussed spending interest off it. Mr. Christianson asked if the park capital funding of $50,000 is used for this project, will there be a shortfall in 1991 -93. Mr. Kojetin is hoping to renovate the heating and ventilation system. Presently, this building uses hot water heat with one boiler and has pipes in the floors and walls. The boiler is on its last legs, and Mr. Kojetin is hoping•that in the $200,000 some of the mechanical problems will be taken care of. Mr. Christianson asked if there is any scheduled maintenance for 1991 -1993. Mr. Kojetin said there i_ not. - 2 - Mr. Montgomery asked who holds the purse strings on the developers fund. Mr. Kojetin said the Park Board makes recommendations to the Council for various projects. The last time it was used was for the Arneson Acres Terrace Room development. Mr. Montgomery asked if there are any restrictions on the fund. Mr. Kojetin said no; it was set up for items that benefit the entire community. Mr. Jenkins asked how much money comes into the developers fund. Mr. Kojetin said deverlopers pay eight percent of the raw value of land when areas are developed in Edina. Mr. Christianson asked if the Art Center receive donations from persons other than Edina residents. Diana said they do have students and members from other areas. Usually about 70 percent are Edina residents and 30 percent are non - residents. Mr. Kojetin said the staff recommends the expansion project. Mr. Van Valkenburg is asking for the Park Board's endorsement to go to the Council. Mr. Christianson stated it seems that more and more people will be interested in passive recreation activities. He feels the need is here. Jean Rydell MOVED TO USE $200,000 FROM THE DEVELOPERS FUND AND TO PROCEED WITH THE ART CENTER EXPANSION AS PROPOSED. $50,000 WILL BE PAID BACK FROM ART CENTER DONATIONS WITHIN A PERIOD OF FIVE YEARS. $50,000 WILL BE PAID BACK FROM THE PARK CAPITAL FUND BETWEEN 1991 AND 1993. THE DEVELOPERS FUND WILL BE DEPLETED BY $100,000. Bill Jenkins seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Christianson will attend the June 5, 1989, Council meeting for the Art Center presentation. Mrs. Vagnoni referred to the presentation booklet and asked if it is a good idea to increase the size of the classes. Diana said some of the classes can be-expanded; however, she does not recommend having more than 15 students in any class. 4. OTHER Arneson Acres Memorial Mr. Kojetin briefly updated the Park Board on the status of the Arneson Acres Memorial. The total amount collected is $221,000. Mr. Kojetin is working with the architects to prepare working drawings. He expects to bring final historical museum plans to the Park Board in June or July. Hopefully construction will being in August and could probably be completed over the holidays. Nine -Hole Golf Course Update Mr. Kojetin indicated we are still waiting on the Corps of Engineers for the permit. He expects the Executive Course building will open on Saturday. Tee Oasis Mr. Kojetin reported Mr. Valliere drawings and have a final one they 1 and 10 to see what it looks like do three to four tees per year. and the architects are working on the tee oasis like. We will construct a tee oasis on tee number If the oasis works out, we will set up a plan to - 3 - Canadian Geese Update A board member asked about the possibility of the City using swan decoys to keep Canadian Geese out of ponds. Colonial Church is using them, and they do not have a goose problem. Mr. Kojetin explained the City is in a three -year program with the University of Minnesota and most of the surrounding communities to relocate the geese. This is the third year of the program. Van Valkenburg Park The infields are constructed and two walls are up on the park building. Adult softball games are scheduled at Van Valkenburg in early July. Trash Containers Mrs. Vagnoni mentioned there are not a lot of trash cans. She asked if maintenance men will put them out in the spring. Mr. Kojetin said they will be replaced. They are taken away for the winter months because they get stolen or vandalized. Meeting adjourned 8:40 p.m. - 4 - PAGE - 109 CITY OF EDINA SEVEN YEAR CAPITAL PLAN 1989 ding renovation TOTAL ART CENTER GUN RANGE: Equipment pistol range Rennovation building Target equipment TOTAL GUN RANGE RECREATION CENTER (ARENA): Furnace Ice resurfacer Recondition pavilion TOTAL RECREATION CENTER /ARENA S 53.000 S 0 S 12 S 5 S 36 INT FND S 5,000 S 5 INT FND 25,000 S 25 INT FND 4.000 S 4 S 34,000 S 0 S 5 S 25 S 4 INT FND S 20,000 $ 20 INT'FND 50,000 S 50 INT FND 70.000 10 10 S 10 S 10 S 10 S 10 S 10 S 140,000 S 0 S 30 S 60 S 10 S 10 S 10 . S 10 S 10 GOLF COURSE: Clubhouse & Maintenance Equipment EARNINGS $173,000 Dredging ponds EARNINGS 45,000 S 45 Parking lot EARNINGS 35,000 S 35 Upgrade old clubhouse EARNINGS 45,000 $ 45. Bridge replacement - hole 17 8 18 EARNINGS 45,000 S 45 Resurface cart paths EARNINGS 50.000 S 50 TOTAL GOLF COURSE S 345.000 S 0 $173,000 S 45 S 35 S 45 S 45 S 50 FUNDING ESTIMATED CARRY DESCRIPTION SOURCE COST OVER 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 GENERAL FUND (CONT.): SWIMMING POOL: Replace filter system INT FND S 25,000 S 25 Seal parking lots INT FND 10,000 S 10 Renovation pool INT FND 60,000 S 60 Lights INT FND 7,000 7 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL S 102,000 S O S 25 S S 10 S 67 ding renovation TOTAL ART CENTER GUN RANGE: Equipment pistol range Rennovation building Target equipment TOTAL GUN RANGE RECREATION CENTER (ARENA): Furnace Ice resurfacer Recondition pavilion TOTAL RECREATION CENTER /ARENA S 53.000 S 0 S 12 S 5 S 36 INT FND S 5,000 S 5 INT FND 25,000 S 25 INT FND 4.000 S 4 S 34,000 S 0 S 5 S 25 S 4 INT FND S 20,000 $ 20 INT'FND 50,000 S 50 INT FND 70.000 10 10 S 10 S 10 S 10 S 10 S 10 S 140,000 S 0 S 30 S 60 S 10 S 10 S 10 . S 10 S 10 GOLF COURSE: Clubhouse & Maintenance Equipment EARNINGS $173,000 Dredging ponds EARNINGS 45,000 S 45 Parking lot EARNINGS 35,000 S 35 Upgrade old clubhouse EARNINGS 45,000 $ 45. Bridge replacement - hole 17 8 18 EARNINGS 45,000 S 45 Resurface cart paths EARNINGS 50.000 S 50 TOTAL GOLF COURSE S 345.000 S 0 $173,000 S 45 S 35 S 45 S 45 S 50 EDINA ART CENTER BOARD 7:30 a.m. April 20, 1989 Edina Art Center MEMBERS.PRESENT: James Van Valkenburg, Peter Spokes, Art Dickey, Betty Paugh, Liz Eisenbrey, Judy Smith, Harriette Bach, Sandra Clark, Suzie Kelm, Dee Dege MEMBERS ABSENT: Dodie Paul STAFF PRESENT: Diana Hedges, Bob Kojetin, Stacey Kness OTHERS PRESENT: Pat Greer 1. CALL TO ORDER Mr. Van Valkenburg called the meeting to order at 7:30 a.m. 2. APPROVAL OF MARCH 16, 1989, MINUTES Peter Spokes MOVED TO ACCEPT THE MINUTES OF THE MARCH 16, 1989, MEETING. Harriette Bach seconded the motion. Diana indicated the minutes did not list the entire Juried Show Committee. The committee consists of the following: Kathryn Bennett, Kathleen Currie, Art Dickey, Mary Dvorak, Pat Greer, Diana Hedges, Suzie Kelm, Mollie Paulson, Peter R. Spokes, Polly Wadsworth, and Marion Ward. MOTION AND CORRECTION CARRIED. 3. DIRECTOR'S REPORT See attached. Kathryn Bennett is the new staff person to replace Kathy Gustafson. Peggy Kelly will no longer be the Art Center liaison. The Council feels liaisons to boards and commission is not - necessary. Peter Spokes MOVED TO WRITE A LETTER OF APPRECIATION TO PEGGY KELLY FOR HER-YEARS OF SERVICE AS LIAISON TO THE ART CENTER BOARD. Betty Paugh seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Kojetin indicated the Council is asking boards to choose a month on the third Monday to meet at 6 p.m. with the Council. 4. BUILDING PROGRAM UPDATE Mr. Dickey explained the preliminary building addition drawings. The expansion is proposed to include a new entrance to the garage classroom. The present garage classroom would be changed into a small office, service, and sales area. The gift shop will have a higher ceiling, and the space will be mechanically ventilated. The present office area will be Diana's office and a conference area. Mrs. Bach asked if there was a library area. Mrs. Paugh asked if the library area could be included in the office /service area. Diana suggested shelving could be added to the main room for reference materials. - 1 - 5. Mrs. Clark asked if the bench outside will be disturbed by the addition. Mr. Dicke, said it will be disturbed but it will probably be more attractive after the expansion. Ms. Dege expressed concern about the new vestibule and entrance area being on the north side of the building. Mr. Dickey indicated the north side of the building seems to be the only place for an entrance of this type. Visitors would be directed through the service area and gift gallery before reaching the main gallery. Ms. Dege's concern was the difference in atmosphere walking into an office area as opposed to entering into the art gallery. Diana stated it is important to have visitors walk through the supply and gift shop area. Mr. Spokes asked why the original entrance door has to be locked. Mr. Dickey indicated it would be a security issue having only one entrance; the present entrance would not have to be locked. Mrs. Greer said the office area wouldn't be able to see the gallery and the original entrance. Mr. Dickey continued to explain the lower level studio area of the expansion. It would include a 940 square foot painting studio with a north slope light and storage lockers. This room is approximately 50 percent larger than the Nichols Room. It also includes a 900 square foot sculpture studio /multi - purpose room that could be used for other classes. The sculpture studio would have welding but no casting. An outdoor path would end at the sculpture court. Ms. Dege indicated the ambiance will be changed because the lake is not visible. Mr. Dickey said a window can be added to see the lake, but it is not necessary for light because of the light provided by the skylights. Mr. Dickey indicated the approximate cost has been based on cost per square foot including a communication system. The basement of the building is heated by radiant heat -- copper pipes in the walls and the floor covered by concrete. The garage and studio are heated by electricity but should be heated by the boiler. There was a concern expressed about parking. Mr. Dickey said five to six parking places could be added on the west side of the building by having cars park on the north side of the current parking lot. There is also a possibility of parking down 64th Street and re- constructing the path to have visitors enter downstairs. Mrs. Clark suggested planting wild cedar between the parking lot and the neighboring homes to prevent cars from being seen. Mrs. Smith asked if Taylor Knoll will be disturbed. Mr. Dickey said it will not. Mrs. Clark asked if glass block could be used on the outside of the expansion instead of concrete stucco to allow more natural light. Mr. Dickey said he could look into the cost of using glass block. The prepared proposal packet will be on the Park Board agenda May 9 and City Council June 5. Mr. Spokes suggested adding a section called "Indebtedness" as an item "D" to page 7. This would show a zero indebtedness. He also suggested removing the line. items with 0 from page 8. CELEBRATE THE ARTS REPORT Mrs. Clark reported the three different ticket prices was a great idea. She feels the ticket prices should be raised for next year. The preliminary totals are as follows: $8950 ticket sales; $770 donations from people not in attendance; $9425 silent auction for a total of $19,641. She said the food was good, and the decorations were nice -- special thanks to those who helped. Compared to last year, w - 2 - made $2500 more in the auction items and incurred more expense with the invitations. The Edina Foundation is holding the proceeds of $13,000 and earning interest. The board will draft letters of thanks to Sandra Clark and Sharon Hale. 6. EDINBOROUGH Pat Greer reported the openings are being coordinated with the Art Center on Thursdays. In May Steven Linder will be showing aerial photographs. In June they will have the Minnesota Artists Association. Edinborough will celebrate its second anniversary in June. 7. JURIED SHOW Peter Spokes reported the judging will be held June 15 from 5 to 7 pm. So far $1975 has been promised. Last year $2845 was promised. The main concern is we won't get as much money. 8. VOLUNTEER LUNCHEON - Mrs. Smith sent 140 invitations for the luncheon. To date she has received 40 no's and 30 yes's. She passed a sign -up sheet for people to bring food or money. Diana said reservations for the City Volunteer Recognition Reception should be made today. Meeting adjourned 8:50 a.m. - 3 - A. r o e q: ch 0 •' ~�bRpopi, • lade REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Jane Paulus, I -494 PMT Fran Hoffman, I -494 PMT Date: 5 June, 1989 Subject: 1 -494 EIS Update Recommendation: None. Agenda Item # vll.c. Consent ❑ Information Only FT] Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Info /Background: The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn /DOT) has a consultant under contract for the I -494 Environmental Impact Statement work (EIS). The firm selected is BRW. The I -494 Project Management Team has met to review the first document prepared by the consultant. The document states what will be studied in the EIS. A majority of the information developed in the I -494 Corridor Study was placed directly into the Scoping Document. The document presents information on alternatives which could meet.the corridor needs and their potential impacts. This document is approximately sixty pages long and is the first report prepared in the EIS process. Additionally, the length of the corridor being studied is longer than the initial corridor study. The original corridor area went from the airport to the intersection of I -494 and the Crosstown Highway. The added new portion extends from the Crosstown Highway /I -494 interchange to the I -394 (old 12)/ I -494 interchange. As a result, the costs for the EIS are higher than the original estimates as agreed upon by the cities involved with Mn /DOT. The I -494 Corridor Commission (JPO) was asked to review this with a suggestion Report /Recommendation I -494 EIS Update 5 June, 1989 Page Two that Minnetonka's share be increased in relation to the other cities in the organization. The EIS also required some new categories to be studied such as historical and hazardous waste,.if found in the corridor analysis. As such, the cities will be asked to increase their financial participation in years 2 and 3 of this agreement. The expected total increase for Edina has yet to be determined, although we might expect our participation to increase approximately $5,000 over our original total commitment of $36,000. A. /I t �l\ 0 e Q,3 ° � • Rpop," O . �xee REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Francis Hoffman City Engineer Date: 5 June, 1989 Subject: Valley View Road - Crosstown Highway Preliminary Review Recommendation: Agenda Item # VTT.D. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Consider sending a letter to William Crawford, District 5 Engineer for Mn /DOT requesting review of this layout as it relates to the Crosstown Highway and addition of auxiliary lanes on the Crosstown Highway from Valley View to T.H. 100. Info /Background: Last fall, the City Council directed staff to look at Valley View Road from West 69th Street to the Crosstown Highway as it related to: development at Centennial Lakes, Southdale Area; stormwater ponding; and long range transpor- tation planning. We have completed a preliminary review and will show via a graphics layout at the Council meeting which deals with all issues. Additionally, we have met with the Traffic Engineering Section at District 5 Mn /DOT about the layout and potential need for additional auxiliary lanes from Valley View Road to T.H. 100. Staff would like to present this information prior to the Council seeing the District 5 presentation at the June 17th Council workshop. riA, • O e AY �o •'NCbRpOM�bv • sea REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Ken Ros 1 and From: Janet Chandler Date: June 2, 1989 Subject: Recycling Contract Recommendation: Agenda Item # v I L.E. # 1 Consent ❑ Information Only Mgr . Recommends To HRA © To Council Action ❑ Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Adoption of Resolution relating to the Agreement for Recycling Collection authorizing the execution of documents. Info /Background: Attachments: - Resolution authorizing the execution of documents. Agreement for city -wide recycling collection by BFI Recycling Systems, July 1, 1989 through December,31, 1990. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE AGREEMENT FOR RECYCLING COLLECTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City "), as follows: 1. The Edina City Council has previously approved a plan for the collection of recyclable materials in the City. Pursuant to such approval, the City staff has prepared an Agreement for Recycling Collection with BFI Recycling Systems of Minnesota, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (the "Agreement"). A draft of the Agreement has been prepared and submitted to the City Council and is hereby directed to be filed with the City Clerk. 2. The form and content of the Agreement is hereby approved subject to such modifications as are deemed appropriate, and approved by the City Attorney and the City Manager. The Mayor and City Manager are directed to execute the Agreement, with such modifications as are deemed appropriate and approved by the City Attorney and City Manager, which approval shall be conclusively evidenced by the execution of the Agreement by the Mayor and City Manager. The Mayor and City Manager are also authorized and directed to execute such other instruments as may be required to give effect to the trans- actions contemplated by such Agreement. Dated this day of June, 1989. Attest: City Clerk a Mayor N 2465g AGREEMENT FOR RECYCLING COLLECTION THIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered into as of the day of , 1989 by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City ") and BFI Recycling Systems of Minnesota, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (the "Contractor "). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City desires to establish a City -wide system for collecting Recyclables (below defined) on the terms and conditions in this Agreement; and WHEREAS, Contractor desires to collect Recyclables in the City pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual terms and conditions herein set out, the City and Contractor hereby agree as follows: Section 1. Definitions. Alternate Collection Point: a place adjacent to the Dwelling, or garage accessory thereto, and visible from the -. street in front of the Dwelling. City: the City of Edina, Minnesota. Collection Districts: the districts shown on the map of the City attached hereto as Exhibit A and hereby made a part hereof, as they may be changed pursuant to.,paragraph 3.2 hereof. Collection Hours: collection shall begin no earlier than 7:00 A.M. and be completed by 5:00 P.M. of the District Collection Day. Collection Point: the curb of the street in front of the Dwelling, or by the side of the alley for Dwellings which have garbage service at the alley. Collection Vehicles: any vehicle validly and currently licensed and approved by the City for collection of Recyclables within the City. Contractor: BFI Recycling Systems of Minnesota, Inc., a Minnesota corporation. f ` ; District Collection Davy: the day of the week shown on Exhibit A attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof for each Collection District. Dwellings: those single - family dwellings now or hereafter located in the Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1) as determined by the Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance No. 825) of the City, and those double dwellings now or hereafter located in the Double Dwelling Unit District (R -2) as determined by said Zoning Ordinance. Holidays: any of New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Missed Collection: the failure of Contractor to collect from a Dwelling the Recyclables placed at the Collection Point during Collection Hours on the District Collection Day for that Dwelling. Non - Recyclables: all refuse, garbage, rubbish and waste matter which is not a Recyclable. Recyclables: newsprint, corrugated paper, glass containers, aluminum foil and cans, tin cans, steel cans and bi -metal cans. " Recyclables" also includes other materials that may be hereafter be required to be collected as a recyclable by the County of Hennepin or Hennepin County's Department of Environment and Energy, or be added to, or deleted from, the definition in this Agreement by written agreement of Contractor and the City. Also, polyethelene terephthalate (PET) and high density polyethelene (HDPE) shall be included as a recyclable on November 1, 1989. Recycling Containers: uniform containers specified by the City to be used for storage of Recyclables by the residents of Dwellings. Recycling Coordinator: the person appointed by the City from time to time as the Recycling Coordinator. In the absence of the Recycling Coordinator, the Assistant City Manager shall act as Recycling Coordinator, and in the absence of both the Recycling Coordinator and the Assistant City Manager, the Assistant to the City Manager shall act as Recycling Coordinator. Section 2. Term. This Agreement shall commence on July 1, 1989 and expire at midnight, December 31, 1990, unless earlier terminated as herein provided. -2- Section 3. Collection; Frequency; Districts; Collection Point; Recycling Containers: Ownership; Alternate Collection Point. 3.1. Contractor shall collect from every Dwelling in each Collection District all Recyclables which have been placed at the Collection Point, whether or not in Recycling Containers, during the Collection Hours on the District Collection Day for that Collection District. The first collection shall be on July 3, 1989. 3.2. All Dwellings in the same Collection District shall have the same District Collection Day. Contractor presently provides, and may provide in the future, garbage collection to some Dwellings in the City. The District Collection Day for each Dwelling shall be the same day that garbage collection service is now or hereafter provided by Contractor for that Dwelling. Contractor may change the boundaries of any Collection District in order to comply with the immediately preceding sentence by written notice to the City and to all Dwellings affected by.the change. 3.3. Collection of Recyclables shall be made only during Collection Hours. Contractor shall advise Dwelling residents to have Recyclables placed at the Collection Point by 7:00 A.M. on the District Collection Day for that Dwelling. 3.4. Recyclables shall be collected from all Dwellings in each Collection District once each week, on the District Collection Day. Each collection shall be made regardless of the availability of markets for any one or more Recyclables. 3.5. If Contractor determines that the collection of Recyclables in a Collection District will not be completed by 5:00 P.M. on the District Collection Day, Contractor shall notify the Recycling Coordinator by 4 :00 P.M. on that day and request an extension of the collection hours. Contractor shall inform the Recycling Coordinator of the areas in that Collection District not completed, the reason for noncompletion and the expected time of completion. The Recycling Coordinator, in his /her sole discretion, shall grant or deny the extension. If denied, the collection of Recyclables in that Collection District shall be completed the following day within the Collection Hours. If granted, the collection of Recyclables in that Collection District shall be completed within the extended hours. 3.6. Contractor shall purchase 13,600 Recycling Containers. The Recycling Containers shall be the green -3- colored containers, with attached cover, but without wheels, manufactured by Shamrock Industries Incorporated, Minneapolis, Minnesota. All such containers shall bear a City logo and Hennepin County logo of a kind determined by the City. Such containers shall have a written five (5) year warranty from the manufacturer warranting against defects in material and construction, and against breakage when used in the normal anticipated manner, and, otherwise, shall be on terms and conditions acceptable to the City. All such containers when purchased by Contractor shall be delivered to Contractor and shall be safely stored by Contractor at its facilities at 9813 Flying Cloud Drive, Eden Prairie, Minnesota. All such containers shall be and become the property of the City when purchased by Contractor and Contractor shall duly execute and deliver to the City a bill of sale, Uniform Commercial Code financing statements, an assignment to the City of the manufacturer's warranty, and such other documents as the City may request from time to time to evidence such ownership by the City. The City shall deliver the Recycling Containers to each Dwelling on or before July 1, 1989, or within thirty (30) days after they are made available to the City for delivery, whichever is later. The Recycling Containers shall be made available by Contractor to the City when and as requested by the City for removal from Contractor's storage facilities. 3.7. After the initial delivery of Recycling Containers to Dwellings is done by the City pursuant to paragraph 3.6 hereof, the Contractor shall deliver the balance of the 13,600 Recycling Containers initially purchased by Contractor to residents of Dwellings as soon as possible after requested by such residents, whether as new or as replacement Recycling Containers. Once all of said 13,600 Recycling Containers are delivered to Dwellings, Contractor shall supply and deliver all new or replacement Recycling Containers requested by a Dwelling resident as soon as possible after such request is made. Contractor may charge to such resident the cost of such new or replacement Recycling Container; provided, however, that Contractor shall use its best efforts and all due diligence, without charge to the City or any resident of a Dwelling, to obtain new Recycling Containers from the manufacturer thereof under the manufacturer's warranty when a replacement Recycling Container is made necessary due to a cause which is, or reasonably could be, covered by such warranty, and if a new Recycling Container is obtained under such warranty, no charge shall be made therefor to the City or any resident of a Dwelling. The City hereby appoints Contractor as its agent for the purpose of making such warranty claims. Such appointment shall continue only so long as this Agreement is in force. The City shall have no obligation to pay for any Recycling Containers other than said 13,600 Recycling Containers, or to deliver any such Recycling Containers except as provided in paragraph 3.6 hereof. IME 3.8. All Recyclables placed at the Collection Point shall be owned by and the responsibility of the residents of the Dwelling so placing such Recyclables, until collected by Contractor, at which time the Recyclables shall become the property and responsibility of Contractor. 3.9. The City may decide, at any time, at its sole option, by notice to Contractor, to require collection of Recyclables from all Dwellings at the Alternate Collection Point. If such decision is made, Contractor shall give notice to all Dwellings advising residents of the change in the Collection Point and the date of such change. Contractor shall commence collection of Recyclables at the Alternate Collection Point on the first day of the first month following the month in which such notice is given by the City, but if such notice is given by the City less than fifteen (15) days before the end of a month, the commencement of collection at the Alternate Collection Point shall commence on the first day of the second month following the month in which such notice is given by the City. References in this Agreement to the Collection Point for a Dwelling shall mean and -refer to the Alternate Collection Point for that Dwelling from and after the date Contractor commences collection at the Alternate Collection Point for that Dwelling pursuant to such notice from the City. Section 4. Missed Collections; Complaints; Severe Weather; Holidays. 4.1. Contractor shall maintain an office and office staff during normal working days and hours adequate to receive and respond to calls and letters from residents of the City relative to Missed Collections, or other complaints concerning collection of Recyclables. Contractor shall advise the Recycling Coordinator and all Dwelling residents of the address and phone number of such office, and any change thereof. Initially such office address and phone number shall be as set out in paragraph 14.10 hereof. 4.2. Contractor shall k e all calls and letters received pu and the Contractor's response and Recycling Coordinator at the requ Coordinator, but not more often t h City Hall of the City. The daily name, address and phone number of purpose and reason for the call or response, and the date and time of account shall be delivered to the review and copying if so requested -5- ep a daily written account of rsuant to paragraph 4.1 hereof shall review them with the est of the Recycling an once each week, at the account shall include the such resident and the time, letter and the Contractor's such response. The daily Recycling Coordinator for by the Recycling Coordinator. 4.3. If Contractor receives notice of a Missed Collection before 12:00 P.M. on the District Collection Day for the Dwelling so missed, the Recyclables at that Dwelling will be collected on that same day; otherwise the Recyclables at that.Dwelling will be collected before 12:00 P.M. the next day. 4.4. In the event of severe weather collection of Recyclables hereunder may be postponed at the discretion of the City after consultation with Contractor. Postponement, if any, shall be to the next day, or such other day which may be mutually agreed upon by Contractor and the City. 4..5. If a Holiday prevents collection on any District Collection Day, Contractor may change that District Collection Day to a day approved by the Recycling Coordinator, but which approved day shall be either one day before or one day after the regular District Collection Day. Notice of such approved change shall be given by Contractor to all Dwellings affected by the change. 4.6. Contractor shall be responsible for all action necessary to properly respond to all complaints. Section 5. Improperly Prepared Recyclables: Non - Recyclables. 5.1. Contractor shall collect all Recyclables even if contaminated with food or dirt or mixed with Non - Recyclables; provided, however, that Recyclables which are, in the reasonable opinion of Contractor, excessively contaminated with food or dirt, or mixed with an excessive amount of Non - Recyclables, need not be collected. In the event any such Recyclables are not so collected, Contractor shall leave a tag reminding the resident to properly prepare and separate Recyclables for collection. Such reminder tag shall be approved by the Recycling Coordinator prior to use or amendment. 5.2. If Non - Recyclables are left at a Collection Point, Contractor need not collect such Non - Recyclables under this Agreement, but Contractor shall leave a tag reminding the resident at that Dwelling that such items are not Recyclables. Such reminder tag shall be approved by the Recycling Coordinator prior to use or amendment. 5.3. Any Recyclables or Non - Recyclables not collected pursuant to paragraphs,5.1 or 5.2 hereof shall be moved by Contractor, at,the time it is there for the collection, to the same point to which the Recycling Container is to be returned pursuant to paragraph 6.2 hereof. -6- Section 6. Clean -up; Return of Containers. 6.1. Contractor shall clean all Collection Points of all Recyclables and collect, pick up and remove all material spilled or dropped during collection, or blown from the Collection Vehicle during collection or hauling operations. Contractor shall also be responsible for removal of Recyclables and Non - Recyclable materials pursuant to* paragraph 5.3 hereof. 6.2. Contractor shall return all Recycling Containers to the area of the garage of the Dwelling, by the side of the Dwelling or other location near the Dwelling agreed upon by the Dwelling resident and Contractor. Section 7. Collection Vehicles; Driving Laws. 7.1. Only Collection Vehicles shall be used by Contractor for collection of Recyclables in the City. 7.2. Each Collection Vehicle shall be equipped with (i) warning flashers; (ii) warning alarms to indicate movement in reverse; (iii) signs on the rear stating "This Vehicle Makes Frequent Stops "; (iv) a broom and shovel for cleaning up spills; and (v) such other equipment as the City may hereafter reasonably require. 7.3. Collection Vehicles, and equipment therein, shall be maintained in proper working order, shall be kept clean and as free from odor as possible, and shall be maintained and licensed in such manner as may now or hereafter be required by any statute, law, ordinance, rule or regulation now or hereafter applicable. Also, Collection Vehicles shall be made available for inspection by the City or its representatives, at the City's request, made not more often than once every six months, and at a location in the City to be designated by the City. 7.4. All Collection Vehicles shall be identified on both sides of the Vehicle with Contractor's name and telephone number. 7.5. Collection and transportation of Recyclables shall be accomplished in full compliance with all laws, statutes, ordinances and regulations now or hereafter applicable, of all federal, state and local governing bodies, including, without limitation, those of the City and of the County of Hennepin, Minnesota. -7- 7.6. The foregoing provisions of this Section notwithstanding, it is agreed that the provisions of any ordinance of the City now or hereafter in effect which impose greater, more, or stricter requirements for Collection Vehicles or Contractor's personnel than are contained in this Agreement, shall be complied with by Contractor in addition to the provisions of this Agreement. Section 8. Personnel. Personnel of Contractor engaged in collection of Recyclables shall (i) conduct the work in a neat and courteous manner; (ii) take reasonable care not to damage-property or cause injury to persons; (iii) not perform the work while consuming or under the influence of alcohol or illegally used controlled substances; and (iv) be duly and currently licensed as required by applicable laws, statutes, ordinances and regulations for performance of their work. Section 9 Reports; Disposition of Recyclables. 9.1. Contractor shall keep accurate records consisting of weigh slips with the net weight of Recyclables collected in the City by each Collection Vehicle. Copies of such weigh slips for any month or months shall be sent to the City upon request of the City specifying the month or months for which such slips are desired. Contractor will also send to the City each month on or before the tenth day of the month after the month to which the report relates, a report of the total tons of Recyclables collected in the City during the then prior month, the actual weight or percentage of the total that each Recyclable material represents, and the markets used for the sale of, and primary purchasers of, such Recyclables. Such report shall also include such other information as the City 'from time to time shall require. Each such report, and those sent to the City pursuant to Section 9.2 hereof, shall be signed by an officer of Contractor and be certified as true, correct and complete. 9.2. The personnel of Contractor in the Collection Vehicles shall keep a record of the number of Dwellings in each Collection District that have Recyclables at the Collection Point during Collection Hours on that District's District Collection Day. These records shall be sent to the City monthly with the reports described in paragraph 9.1 hereof. 9.3. In the event the City establishes a mandatory recycling program for Dwellings, then, upon notice thereof by the City, Contractor shall add to the report required by Section 9.2 hereof the addresses of Dwellings that so participate in the collection of Recyclables. -8- 9.4. The City, and its agents and representatives, shall have the right, during normal business hours, to examine, inspect and copy the books and records of Contractor relating to the records and information to be kept or reported to the City pursuant to this Section 9 and Section 4 hereof. Such books and records shall be kept and made available to the City, and its agents and representatives, for such purposes, on the request of the City, at a place in the Minneapolis -St. Paul metropolitan area of which the City shall be continuously advised. 9.5. Contractor shall also prepare and submit to the City, at the request of the City, such other reports, data and information relative to Contractor's duties under this Agreement as may be required of the City or of Contractor by any statute, law, ordinance, rule or regulation now or hereafter applicable, or which may now or hereafter be requested of the City by Hennepin County. 9.6. All reports given to, and other data and information obtained by, the City pursuant to this Agreement shall be the property of the City to be used as it shall determine without obligation to Contractor. 9.7. Contractor shall be solely responsible for the marketing, distribution and disposal of Recyclables. Contractor agrees, however, that in distributing or disposing of Recyclables, it will not (i) deposit, or cause to be deposited, any Recyclables in any landfill, or (ii) burn, or ,,cause to be burned, any Recyclables in any incinerator, or (iii) deposit or distribute, or cause to be deposited or distributed, any Recyclables in any way or manner which is contrary to any applicable law, statute, ordinance, rule or regulation now or hereafter in force. Provided, however, that the restrictions at (i) and (ii) above shall not apply to any Recyclables which are deposited in a landfill or burned, as the case may be, pursuant to specific prior written approval granted by the County of Hennepin, and which approval has been consented to, in writing, by the City. Section 10 Promotional and Informational Materials. 10.1. Contractor and the City will cooperate in developing a comprehensive on -going promotional program to encourage participation in the recycling program of the City. 10.2. As a part of such promotional program, Contractor shall plan and prepare, at its cost, for review and approval by the City, and once approved by the City, shall -9- distribute, deliver, promote, conduct or publish, as the case may be, the following, all without cost or expense to the City or its residents: (a) Brochures for distribution to each Dwelling, advising residents of all Dwellings of at least the following: (i) Collection Hours, (ii) the District Collection Day for each Dwelling, (iii) Collection Districts, (iv) the Collection Point, and (v) Contractor's policy regarding Holidays and Missed Collections; . (b) Press releases for publication in the Edina Sun - Current; (c) At least one newspaper ad at the beginning of this Agreement, and at least one such ad each six months thereafter during the term of this Agreement, for publication in the Edina Sun - Current; (d) Recycling update reports at least every three months during the term of this Agreement for delivery or mailing to each Dwelling; (e) Presentations to schools and civic groups in the City; (f) A "kick -off" ceremony for the recycling program; (g) A video on recycling to be shown at least three times during the term of this Agreement-on the public access cable TV channel serving the City, the first such showing to be within two months after July 1, 1989; and (h) Notice to.all residents of all Dwellings of the Alternate Collection Point and the date collections will start at the Alternate Collection Point, when such Alternate Collection Point is decided upon by the City, all pursuant to Paragraph 3.9 hereof. Section 11. Payment by the City. 11.1. For all of the services to be provided hereunder by Contractor, the City shall pay Contractor as follows: -10- (a) During such time as Recyclables are collected at the Collection Point, the sum of Twenty Five Thousand Three Hundred Eighty -five and No /100 Dollars ($25,385.00) per month; and (b) During such time as Recyclables are collected at the Alternate Collection Point, the sum of Thirty Two Thousand Seven Hundred Thirty -four and No /100 Dollars ($32,734.00) per month. In each case, a pro rata portion of the monthly payment shall be paid equal to the pro rata portion of any month that this Agreement is in force. Each payment shall be made on or before the tenth day of the month following the month for which services were rendered hereunder, subject to the provisions of this Section 11 and Section 13 hereof. 11.2. In addition to the payments to be made pursuant to paragraph 11.1 hereof, the City shall pay to Contractor, Contractor's cost of purchasing the Recycling Containers pursuant to paragraph 3.6 hereof, as follows: (a) $68,000.00, to be paid within thirty days of receipt by the City of evidence of the cost incurred by Contractor for the Recycling Containers and evidence of ownership of the Recycling Containers by the City, as below provided; and (b) $4,155.56 shall be paid to Contractor with, and in addition to, each monthly payment to be made pursuant to paragraph 11.1 hereof. To determine the cost paid by Contractor for such Recycling Containers, Contractor shall deliver to the City evidence of such purchase price as the City may reasonably require, including, without limitation, paid invoices or purchase orders, but it is agreed that the above amounts shall.be paid by the City even if the cost paid by Contractor is more or less than the amount to be paid by the City. No payment shall be made by the City pursuant to this paragraph 11.2 until such evidence of such purchase price is received by the City and until an assignment of warranty, as provided in paragraph 3.6 hereof, and any such evidence of ownership of the Recycling Containers requested by the City pursuant to paragraph 3.6 hereof is received by the City. 11.3. Also, in any event, no monthly payment to be made pursuant to paragraphs 11.1 or 11. -2 hereof shall be made earlier than ten days after receipt by the City of the monthly reports required by paragraphs 9.1, 9.2, 9.3 and 9.5 hereof. -11- 11.4. Any payment due to Contractor under this Section 11 shall be reduced by any liquidated damages due under paragraph 13.7 hereof, and by any costs and expenses, and interest thereon, due the City pursuant to paragraph 13.3 hereof. 11.5. No claim for services furnished by Contractor but not specifically provided for herein need by paid by the City. Section 12 Insurance• Bond. 12.1. Contractor shall provide on the date hereof a certificate of insurance evidencing liability coverage for bodily injury or death in the amount of at least Six Hundred Thousand and 00 /100 Dollars ($600,000.00) for any one person and in the amount of at least Six Hundred Thousand and 00 /100 Dollars ($600,000.00) for two or more persons for the same occurrence, and for damages to property in the sum of at least One Hundred Thousand and 00 /100 Dollars'($100,000.00). The certificate of insurance, or other evidence satisfactory to the City, shall indicate payment of the premium therefor for the full term of this Agreement. The certificate of insurance shall name the City as an additional insured and state that Contractor's coverage shall be the primary coverage in the event of a loss and otherwise be on terms and conditions, including the amount of any deductibles and any exclusions, acceptable to the City. Further, the certificate of insurance shall provide for thirty days written notice to the City before cancellation, expiration or change of coverage. 12.2. Contractor shall execute and deliver to the City prior to July 1, 1989, a performance and payment bond for a principal sum not less than $600,000.00 and for a term not less than the term of this Agreement and executed by a corporate surety company authorized to do business in Minnesota, to secure the faithful performance of this Agreement by Contractor and conditioned on the Contractor well and truly performing and carrying out this Agreement in strict accord with the -terms and provisions hereof. Such bond otherwise shall be on terms and conditions acceptable to the City. This Agreement shall not become effective until and unless such bond is executed and delivered to the City. If the City requires collection at the Alternate Collection Point pursuant to paragraph 3.9 hereof, the principal amount of the bond shall be increased by not less than $7,350 times the number of months remaining in this Agreement from and including the time of commencement of collections at the Alternate Collection Point, with such increase to be effective at of the time of such- . -12- commencement. This Agreement may be cancelled by the City if said bond is cancelled or the surety therein released of liability for failure to pay any premium or for any other reason or cause, or if it is not increased at the time and in the amount above provided. 12.3. Contractor shall provide workers compensation insurance covering all employees of Contractor engaged in the performance of this Agreement, in accordance with the Minnesota Workers' Compensation Law. Proof of such insurance will be provided by Contractor on request of the City. Section 13, Default: Remedies: Termination. 13.1. Failure by Contractor to perform any obligation or duty of Contractor under this Agreement or to comply with any provision of this Agreement to be complied with by Contractor shall be a default under this Agreement: If any default is not cured or remedied by Contractor within ten days after written notice of the default is given to Contractor, the City can exercise any one or more of the remedies available to it by this Agreement or at law or in equity or by statute. 13.2. In the event of a default herein by Contractor which is not cured or removed within the ten -day period above set out, the City shall have the right to: (a) terminate this'Agreement by written notice to Contractor, which termination shall be effective on the date specified in such notice; (b) stop payment of all moneys due, or to become due, to Contractor under this Agreement; (c) exercise any other remedy granted -by this Agreement as to any specific default or violation set out in.this Agreement; (d) take whatever action, including legal, equitable or administrative, and including mandatory injunction and specific performance, which may appear necessary or desirable to the City to collect any payments due under this Agreement, or to abate or prevent any such default, or to enforce performance and observance of any obligation, agreement or covenant of Contractor under this Agreement; (e) exercise any and all remedies available under the bond delivered pursuant to paragraph 12.2 hereof, including, without limitation, recovery under the bond of any and all monies and damages due hereunder; -13- (f) recover monetary damages suffered or incurred, or to be suffered or incurred, by the City due to the default, even if this Agreement has been terminated, cancelled or rescinded in whole or in part; and (g) take whatever action is required to cure the default, including, without limitation, payments to others, or performance for and on behalf of Contractor of its covenants, obligations and agreements in this Agreement. In addition to the foregoing remedies, the City may take whatever reasonable steps it may deem appropriate to.preserve life or property, or prevent accumulation of Recyclables, or prevent waste, with or without said notice having been given and whether or not said cure period has expired; provided, however, that nothing herein shall be deemed to create any duty or obligation upon the City to take such steps. 13.3. The City shall be entitled to collect from Contractor all costs and expenses incurred by the City in seeking or exercising the remedies provided to the City pursuant to this Section 13, and in collecting any moneys due the City from Contractor under this Agreement, or from seeking or exercising such remedies, including reasonable attorneys' fees, together with interest thereon at the rate of twelve (12 %) percent per annum, but not in excess of the highest rate permitted by law, from the date of each expenditure by the City until paid by Contractor. 13.4. No remedy herein conferred upon or reserved to the City is intended to be exclusive of any other available remedy or remedies, but each and every such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given to the City under this Agreement or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute. No delay or omission to exercise any right or power accruing upon any default shall impair any such right or power or shall be construed to be a waiver thereof, but any such right and power may be exercised from time to time and as often as may be deemed expedient. In order to entitle the City to exercise any remedy reserved to it, it shall not be necessary to give notice, other than such notice as may be required in this Section 13. 13.5. In the event any agreement contained in this Agreement should be.breached by any party and thereafter waived by the other party, such waiver shall be limited to the particular party so waiving and the particular breach so waived and shall not be deemed to waive any other concurrent, previous or subsequent breach hereunder. No waiver by any party shall be effective unless in writing and signed by the waiving party. -14- 13.6. The foregoing notwithstanding, it is further agreed that if Contractor defaults in its obligations under Section 3 hereof to collect Recyclables and such default is not cured or remedied on the day required under Section 4 hereof, then, without any notice to Contractor, the City may exercise any one or more of its remedies under paragraph 13.2 hereof and collect the cost thereof from Contractor as provided in paragraphs 13.3 and 11.4 hereof. 13.7. In addition to the remedies set out in this Section 13, Contractor shall be liable for liquidated damages in the amount below set out, upon occurrence of the following: (a) For failure to collect any Missed Collection by the time and date required by paragraph 4.3 hereof, - liquidated damages of $10.00 per Missed Collection for each day a Missed Collection is not so collected, starting with and including the next day after the District Collection Day for the Dwelling. (b) For failure to collect all Recyclables from a Collection District on the District Collection Day for that District and within the Collection Hours pursuant to Section 3 hereof, or if collection is extended by the provisions of paragraph 3.5 or paragraph 4.4 hereof, whichever is applicable, and there is a failure to so collect by the extended time or day, liquidated damages of $10.00 per day per Dwelling from which Recyclables are not so collected, but not to exceed $1,000 for each day of such failure, starting with and including the next day after the District Collection Day. The City may deduct the full amount of any liquidated damages from any payment then or thereafter due hereunder to Contractor, but any liquidated damages not..paid by such deduction shall remain the obligation of Contractor and shall be payable by Contractor on demand of the City. The provisions of paragraphs 13.3 and 13.4 hereof also shall apply to this paragraph. 13.8. In addition to the remedies set out in this. Section, if a default occurs under paragraph 14.7 hereof, the City can exercise the remedy provided in that paragraph, if a default occurs under paragraph 14.8 hereof, the City can also exercise the remedy provided in that paragraph, and if Contractor fails to maintain the bond required by, and in the amounts required by, paragraph 12.2 hereof, then the City can exercise the remedy provided in that paragraph. -15- 13.9. This Agreement shall terminate effective the date it is made invalid, if made invalid, by any future law or statute, other than by City ordinance. 13.10. In the event the City fails to make any payment to Contractor when and in the amount required by this Agreement, and if such failure continues for ten days after notice of the failure is given to the City, the Contractor shall have, as its sole and exclusive remedy, the right to recover such sum, together with interest thereon at the rate of twelve percent (12 %) per annum, but not in excess of the highest rate permitted by law, by a civil suit against the City. Also, Contractor shall be entitled to collect from the City all costs and expenses incurred by Contractor in recovering such sum, including reasonable attorneys' fees, with interest on such costs and expenses at the rate of twelve percent (12 %) per annum, but not in excess of the highest rate permitted by law, from the date of each expenditure by Contractor until paid by.the City. Section 14, Miscellaneous. 14.1. The entire agreement of the parties is contained herein. This Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions or waivers of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties. 14.2. Contractor shall not enter into subcontracts for any services provided for in this Agreement without the express prior written consent of the City in each instance. 14.3. At all times and for all purposes hereunder, Contractor is an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. No statement herein shall be construed so as to find Contractor an employee of the City. No employees of Contractor shall be employees of the City. 14.4. Neither party shall assign this Agreement, or any interest arising herein, without the prior written consent of the other party. Also, Contractor shall not subcontract any of the work or duties of Contractor in this Agreement without the prior written consent of the City in each instance. Subject to the foregoing sentence, this Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the respective successors and assigns of the parties hereto. 14.5. Any waiver by either party of a breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not affect in any respect the -16- remainder of this Agreement. No waiver shall be effective unless in writing duly signed by the waiving party. Delay or inaction shall not be deemed a waiver. 14.6. Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and agents, from and against all claims, damages, losses and expenses, including, but not limited to, attorneys' fees and expert witness fees, arising out of or claimed to arise out of the negligent or intentional act or omission of Contractor, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors, or the agents, representatives, employees or any subcontractor in the performance of this Agreement. 14.7. Contractor, at all times, shall comply with all applicable federal, state and City laws, ordinances, rules and regulations relating to non - discrimination, affirmative action and equal employment opportunities. Also Contractor agrees: (1) That, in the hiring of common or skilled labor for the performance of any work under any contract, or any subcontract; no contractor, material supplier, or vendor, shall,.by reason of race, creed, or color, discriminate against the person or persons who are citizens of the United States or resident aliens who are qualified and available to perform the work to which the employment relates; (2) That no contractor, material supplier, or vendor, shall, in any manner, discriminate against, or intimidate, or prevent the employment of any person or persons identified in clause (1) of this paragraph, or on being hired, prevent, or conspire to prevent, the person or persons from the performance of work under any contract on account of race, creed or color; (3) That a, violation of this paragraph 14.7 is a misdemeanor; and (4) That this Agreement may be cancelled or terminated by the City, and all money due, or to become due under this Agreement shall be forfeited for a second or any subsequent violation of the terms or conditions of this paragraph 14.7. 14.8. employee of the in this Agreeme provision shall Contractor will Agreement. Contractor agrees that no City shall have any direct nt or the proceeds thereof. cause this Agreement to be forfeit any payments to be -17- member, officer or or indirect interest Violation of this null and void and made under this 14.9. This Agreement shall be controlled by the laws of the State of Minnesota. 14.10. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, a notice, demand, request or other communication required or permitted under this Agreement to be given by either party to the other shall be sufficiently given and served, and shall be effective and deemed properly given and served, if, and only if, in writing and, if delivered, when personally delivered to an officer, director or official of the party to whom it is addressed, or, if mailed, upon receipt by the addressee when deposited in the United States mail and sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: If to City: 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Attn: Recycling Coordinator If to Contractor: 9813 Flying Cloud Drive - Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Attn: John Moreland Phone No.: 941 -2860 or at such other address (or to the attention of such other person) with respect to any such party as that party may, from time to time, designate by at least fifteen days prior notice given to the other as provided in this paragraph 14.10; provided, however, anything herein contained to the contrary notwithstanding, in order for notice of address change to be effective, it must actually be received by the addressee. Except as provided in the immediately preceding sentence, notice, demand, request or other communication shall be deemed given, received and served if mailed or delivered as above provided even if rejected or refused, or if the notice could not be delivered or because of changed address of which no effective notice was given.. The return receipt date stamp of the United States Post Office shall be conclusive proof of the receipt of any notice given as above provided, and the date of such receipt. 14.11. Wherever in this Agreement the consent or approval of the City is expressly or impliedly required, or is requested, such consent or approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed except as provided in other Sections or parts hereof. Whenever such consent or approval is withheld or -18- delayed, and the perso that such withholding of the person seeking specific performance o shall money damages be given by any party for deemed to be a consent n seeking such consent or approval claims or delay is unreasonable, the only remedy such consent or approval shall be r mandatory injunction, but, in no event, claimed or paid. Consent or approval any specific act or thing shall not be or approval to any subsequent act or thing of 'the same or any other kind. 14.12. If any provision of this Agreement is for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable asto any person or circumstance, the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those.as to which it was held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby, and all provisions of this Agreement in all other respects shall remain in full force and effect and be valid and enforceable. 14.13. Contractor understands that the City intends to collect a portion of its costs under this Agreement from Hennepin County, Minnesota. Therefore, Contractor agrees to execute and deliver such amendments hereof as the City shall reasonably request in order for the City to obtain from Hennepin County, Minnesota, the largest portion of the City's costs hereunder as can be collected from such county. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Contractor have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF EDINA By Its Mayor And Its Manager BFI Recycling Systems of Minnesota, Inc. By Its And Its -19- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 11 1989, by and the Mayor and Manager, respectively, of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of said corporation. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA SS COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1989, by and the and , respectively, of BFI Recycling Systems of Minnesota, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of said corporation. Notary Public -20- EXHIBIT A [Collection Districts] Agenda Item VII.E.2. 1989 RECYCLING BUDGET CONTAINER OPTIONS: A. CONTAINERS WITH COVERS, TOTAL PAID IN 1989 B. CONTAINERS ONLY, TOTAL PAID IN 1989 C. CONTAINERS WITH COVERS, LUMP SUM OF $68,000 IN 1989, BALANCE OVER 18 MONTHS D. CONTAINERS ONLY, $68,000 LUMP SUM, BALANCE OVER 18 MO. COSTS A. B. C. D. Contract for Collection of Recyclables Curbside, Container Return to Garage $152,315 $152,315 $152,315 $152,315 Containers 142,800 108,800 92,934 81,600 City Operated Program, Pickup & Recycling Center, 12 mos. 70-000 70,000 70-000 70,000 Total $365,115 $331,115 $315,249 $303,915 INCOME Sale of City Recyclables $ 34,000 $ ' 34,000 $ 34,000 $ 34,000 Hennepin County: ° * Program reimbursement 150,652 150,652 150,652 150,652 Container reimbursement 68,000 68,000 68,000 68,000 Total $252,652 $252,652 $252,652 $252,652 NET COST TO CITY $112,463 $ 78,463 $ 62,597 $ 51,263 Budgeted for 1989 $ 74,588 $ 74,588 $ 74,588 $ 74,588 Hennepin County will fund 80% of net costs, provided recycling tonnage goals are met. "Hennepin County will fund containers at $5 per household. i 1990 RECYCLING BUDGET CONTAINER OPTIONS: A.B. - -NO CONTAINER COST (PAID IN 1989) C. - -- CONTAINERS WITH COVERS, 18 MONTH PAY D. - -- CONTAINERS ONLY, 18 MONTH PAY THE OPTION CHOSEN FOR 1989 MUST CARRY THROUGH 1990 COSTS (*])Contract for Collection of Recyclables Curbside, Cont. Return to Garage ( *2) Payroll (City) Misc. Supplies & Promotion Containers Total INCOME ( *3) Hennepin Co. Funding Sale of City Recyclables Total A.B. C. D. $304,630 $304,630 $304,630 30,000 30,000 30,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 49,866 27,200 $339,630 $389,496 $366,830 $271,704 $271,704 $271,704 15,000 15,000 15,000 $286,704 $286,704 $286,704 NET COST TO CITY $ 52,926 $102,792 $ 80,126 Budget (assume) same as '89 _ $ 74,588 . $ 74,588 $ 74,588 (*I )Contract costs are based on 18 month contract for city -wide collection of recyclables from one and two family dwellings, in compliance with state and county mandates. ( *3) Funding from Hennepin Co. is assumed to be at the maximum (80F of net costs) according to present policy. ( *2) Payroll includes a Recycling Coordinator and a part - time worker for the Recycling Center. Income from sale of recyclables is less than previous years. - -Garage pickup would add an annual cost of $88,183 and probably not be reimbursed by Hennepin County. , -- Curbside without container return would reduce the annual cost by $62,528. Weekly Recycling Curbside Pick -up begins July 3rd r, ...and \ Here's Scotty to Tell You all About it! ).1 ow e W as o Z ° nom ° In= City of Edina y w Dm Rec clin v g w 3 m Program Scotty essays ■ ■ fou can lake a ifference!" Waste management problems often seem too big for just one person to tackle. But, every person who recycles can help solve the problem. Edina is serious about waste reduc- tion and recycling. We are asking for your cooperation in making Edina, a City That Recycles. Please consult the map in this brochure to determine your collec- tion day and start recycling now! Container_ s •}:{4]p: { ?:rr { {: { { ;.: {4; { { {:+4:U,v, { {• }Y: frn; { {v'r.; H}:•r {.: +/. A container for storage of recycl- ables will be delivered to your home by July 1. If you move, please leave the container for the next resident. The container is the property of the City. This brochure was printed on 100% recycled paper. JUNE 1989 Don't Throw a Good Thing Away! What and How { ti �f .. +r}YA:{9:hYJ:d:4Y.SYfAC••^}: {{ {+:%• %!+ff /N!.{xryr,.p};n ..:•A"ALOOhY+F.M.:IX{?}YAC}} ]YlfiYA00P Place three bags in your container for glass, cans and newspapers. Glass ... • Rinse bottles and jars • Remove caps and rings • Avoid breaking Metal ... • Food and beverage cans • Rinse and remove labels Newspaper ... • Place in bag or bundle • If you have extra newspaper, place beside your container • PLEASEI -NO MAGAZINES OR PHONE BOOKS Cardboard ... • Corrugated cardboard only • Bundle no larger than 3 ft. X 3 ft. • Place in, or next to, container • PLEASE -NO CEREAL (OR SIMILAR) BOXES 110. Curbside Collection IX {4T'A4YR: {:riA::40.W1.i: AC+£!.IX {?+. GJp+:. }:M } }} }'f.•:i•:::NYI::tIX4 %?5C•} } }YAS+A40W9C6 On collection day place your recycling container by the curb or alley by 7AM. BFI RECYCLING SYSTEMS WIII pick -up your materials weekly and place the empty container by your garage. Garbage Policy Edina ordinances specify that garbage is to be stored in containers and not placed at the curb. Recycling Center awwc} x•}.:,• }:s:�::}x•: } }r: }:c•:rx•: a}::::::tt...:.:.. .wrvx•:xs w } }}}r The Recycling Center, located on Eden Avenue one block west of State Highway 100, will remain open 9 AM to 4 PM, Monday through Saturday. Newspaper, glass, cans, crankcase oil, and GOODWILL items in usable condition are accepted. Hazardous Waste Paint, insecticides and other problem items may be taken to a Hennepin County collection site in September. For information call 348 -8984. Compost Program %{•iU.: }.V%W6C{{-0Ott{ :.% %. JN: O} Yfi%NU /.9i {.Yfi }:OFY.. } }::. }::: } }+ } };{ }}Wi: + /.•:{ { {4%?:.'l. {:M:+RY AC-0t Leaves and grass clippings will be picked up by garbage haulers for composting. Call your hauler for pick -up schedule. Residents should place these materials, in bags, at the curb no sooner than 12 hours before the scheduled pick -up. Please observe this regulation and help keep Edina beautiful! �1 A. 0 e to 0 Rip I as To Ken Rosland From: Janet Chandler Date: June 2, 1989 Subject: REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item # v I I - E. #3. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adoption of ordinances to implement recycling program. Info /Background: ORDINANCES ENCLOSED: *711 -A6, to Provide for Collection of Recycl'ables *715, Mandatory Separation of Recyclables *1001 -A4, Anti - Scavenging ' *1301 -A4, to Require Licensing of Haulers Collection Recyclables f i1 r- ORDINANCE NO. 711 -A6 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 711 TO PROVIDE FOR COLLECTION OF RECYCLABLES AND ESTABLISHING A PENALTY The City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, ordains: Section 1. Ordinance No. 711 is hereby amended by renumbering Sec. 14 to Sec. 15, and by adding a new Section 14 as follows:' "Section 14. Collection of Recyclables; Districts. The City Council, by resolution, may establish the entire City as a district for the collection of recyclables as defined in Ordinance No. 715, or may establish more than one such district within the City. The City Council also, by resolution, may designate one or more collectors in each such district for collection of recyclables in that district on terms and conditions to be agreed upon by each such collector and to be approved by the City by resolution of the City Council." Sec. 2. Sec. 15 of Ordinance No. 711 is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 15. Penalty. Any person violating this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to a fine and penalty as set out in Ordinance No. 175 of the City, as from time to time amended." Sec. 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication., First Reading: Second Reading: Published in the Edina Sun - Current on Attest: Clerk Mayor ORDINANCE NO. 715 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR MANDATORY SEPARATION OF RECYCLABLES FROM CERTAIN PREMISES AND IMPOSING A PENALTY The City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, ordains: Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this ordinance is to require mandatory separation of recyclables to aid and promote collection thereof and disposal by means other than deposit in a sanitary landfill or by burning. Sec. 2. Definitions. Whenever used in this ordinance, the following words, terms and phrases and their derivations, shall have the following meanings: "City" means the City of Edina. "County" means Hennepin County, Minnesota. "Dwellings" means those dwellings described at (i) and (ii) of the definition of Premises in this ordinance. "Person" means any natural person, and any association, organization, partnership, corporation or other legal entity. "Premises" means (i) all single family dwellings now or hereafter located in the Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1) as determined by the Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance No. 825) of the City, (ii) all double dwellings now or hereafter located in the Double'Dwelling Unit District (R -2) as determined by said Zoning Ordinance, (iii) all buildings or parts of buildings now or hereafter owned by or leased to the City and located in the City, except, however, park shelter or park toilet buildings, and (iv) all buildings or parts of buildings now or hereafter owned by or leased to the School District and located in the City. "Recyclables" means newsprint, corrugated paper, glass containers, aluminum foil and cans, tin cans, steel cans and bi -metal cans, reasonably free of food, dirt and other contaminants. Polyethelene terepthalate (P.E.T.) and high density polyethelene (H.D.P.E.) shall be included as a recyclable on November 1, 1989. Also included as a recyclable is any other material that the City may hereafter be required to collect as a recyclable by the County of Hennepin or its Department of Environment and Energy. For purposes of this ordinance, recyclables shall not be refuse, rubbish or waste matter as defined in Ordinance No. 711 of the City. "Resident" means every person who is an owner or occupant of a Dwelling, the City as to the buildings or parts thereof described at (iii) of the definition of Premises in this ordinance, and the School District as to buildings or parts thereof described at (iv) of the definition of Premises in this ordinance. "School District" means Independent School District No. 273. Sec. 3. Separation and Storage of Recyclables. (a) Every resident of every premises shall separate the recyclables from their respective premises from all other refuse, garbage, rubbish and waste matter as defined in Ordinance No. 711, and shall store the recyclables separately in containers designated as containers for the storage of recyclables. (b) Containers for storage of recyclables shall be kept in the same location as is designated by Ordinance No. 711 for refuse containers, however, residents of dwellings not earlier than twelve (12) hours prior to scheduled collection of recyclables from their respective dwellings, shall place the containers for recyclables at the curb of the street in front of the dwelling, or by the side. of the alley adjoining the dwelling if that dwelling has refuse collection service at the alley. If recyclables are not collected from a dwelling when scheduled, or if the container for recyclables is not returned by the collector to the side of or near to the dwelling after collection of recyclables, the residents of that dwelling shall promptly return the uncollected recyclables and the said containers to the same location as containers for refuse are kept as designated by Ordinance No. 711. Sec. 4. Collection of Recyclables. (a) Collection of recyclables from premises shall be by a hauler selected and paid by a resident of such premises but which hauler is then duly licensed by the City under Ordinance No. 1301 of the City and other then applicable ordinances of the City or County. Also such collection shall be done in compliance with all other applicable ordinances of the City now or hereafter in effect. (b) The foregoing provisions of paragraph (a) of this Section notwithstanding, the City, at any time, and from time to time, may contract with a hauler for collection of recyclables from some or all premises, and if the City so contracts, the recyclables shall be collected from the premises covered by such contract by the collector under contract with the City and on terms and conditions set out in such contract. Sec. 5. Disposal of Recyclables. Recyclables. collected from premises shall not, in any event, (i) be deposited in any landfill, (ii) be burned in any incinerator, or (iii) be deposited or distributed in any way or manner which is contrary to then applicable law, statute, ordinance, rule or regulation. Provided, however, that the restrictions at (i) and (ii) above shall not apply to any recyclables which are deposited in a landfill or burned pursuant to specific prior written approval granted by the County and consented to, in writing, by the City. Residents shall take such action as is reasonable under the circumstances to determine that recyclables are not disposed of contrary to the provisions of this paragraph. Sec. 6. Reports to City. As and when requested by the City from time to time, the City and School District shall require the haulers of their respective recyclables, who are not under contract with the City, to keep complete and accurate records of the total tons of recyclables collected each month from their respective premises, together with the actual weight or percentage of the total that each recyclable material represents, and the markets used for the sale of, and primary purchasers of, such recyclables. Such records shall be sent to the City, when requested by the City. The City and School District also shall prepare, or require their haulers, who are not under contract with the City, to prepare, and submit to the City, at the request of the City, such other reports, data and information relative to the separation, collection and disposal of recyclables as may be required' by any statute, law, ordinance, rule or regulation now or hereafter applicable, or which may now or hereafter be requested of the City by the County. All such records, reports, data and information, once received by the City, shall become the property of the City to be used'as it shall determine without obligation to any person. Sec. 7. Severability. If any part or provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person, entity or circumstances shall be adjudged unconstitutional or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such judgment shall be confined in its operation to the part, provision or application which is directly involved in the controversy in which such judgment shall have been rendered, and shall not affect or impair the validity of the remainder of this Ordinance or the application thereof to other persons, entities or circumstances. Sec. 8. Penalty. Any person violating this ordinance shall be guilty of a petty misdemeanor, for which the maximum fine shall.be $50.00 plus costs of prosecution. Each day in which a violation occurs constitutes a separate violation. Sec. 9. Controlling Effect. The provisions of this ordinance shall control over any contrary or inconsistent provisions in Ordinance No. 711 of the City. Sec. 10. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication, but not earlier than First Reading: Second Reading: Published in the Edina Sun - Current on: Mayor Attest: Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 1001 -A4 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1001 TO MAKE IT A MISDEMEANOR TO SCAVENGE RECYCLABLES The City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, ordains: Section 1. Ordinance No. 1001 is hereby amended by adding a new Section as follows: "Sec. 21. Scavenging of Recyclables. a. Ownership of recyclables, as defined in Ordinance No. 715 of the City, shall remain and be vested in the person or persons who or which collected and stored - the recyclables, until collected by a hauler authorized by the City to collect recyclables and serving such person or persons, at which time such ownership shall vest in such hauler. b. No person shall remove, take or collect the recyclables owned by any other person except, however, a hauler authorized by the City to collect recyclables and serving such owner as above provided in this section. C. For purposes of this section, person means any natural person, any association, organization, partnership, corporation or other legal entity." Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published in the Edina Sun - Current on Mayor Attest: Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 1301 -A4 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1301 TO REQUIRE COLLECTORS OF RECYCLABLES TO BE LICENSED, AND IMPOSING A PENALTY The City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, ordains: Section 1. The first sentence of Section 1 of Ordinance No. 1301 is hereby amended to read as follows: "No person shall engage in hauling, conveying or collecting rubbish, garbage or other refuse, as defined in Ordinance No. 711 of the City, or recyclables, as defined in Ordinance-No. 715 of the City, unless that person holds a valid license hereunder." Sec. 2. Sec. 16 of Ordinance No. 711 is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 16. Penalty. a. Any person violating this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to a fine and penalty as set out in Ordinance No. 175 of the City, as from time to time amended. b. In addition to the foregoing penalties, the license of any person violating this ordinance may be suspended or revoked as provided by Ordinance No. 141 of the City and Sec. 8 of this ordinance." Sec. 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published in the Edina Sun - Current on Mayor Attest: Clerk Recycled paper �?",, ® -v BROWNING- FERRIS INDUSTRIES NORTHWEST REGION Ms. Janet Chandler Recycling Coordinator City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street _ Edina, MN 55424 Dear Ms. Chandler, I have received the proposed Agreement for Recycling Collection with the City of Edina. In Section 3.6, certain very specific conditions are placed upon the contractor concerning recycling. containers. Although the City Council initially decided -to utilize the Shamrock Recycling containers, I feel it may be beneficial to re- examine the Buckhorn container for use in Edina, for several reasons. 1. Buckhorn can use up to 25% post consumer plastic. This meets the requirement of Hennepin County resolution 89 -5 -422. 2. Buckhorn will unconditionally guarantee their containers for 5 . years. 3. The Buckhorn container is available for a lower cost: $7.00 per container. I would be pleased to discuss this issue with you at your earliest convenience. I have been assured by the distributors of the Buckhorn containers that the containers can be ready in time for an early July start up. I have place the Shamrock order on "hold" until you have an opportunity to examine this-new information. Sincerely, Kevin Nordby Divisional Vice President Recycling Systems KN /nae cc: Ken Rosland P.O. BOX 1375 - MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55440 - (612) 921 -8505 - FAX (612) 921 -8558 8500 NORMANDALE LAKE BOULEVARD, SUITE 850 - BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55437 A. o� e`" REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland Agenda Item # VII. F. From: David A. Velde Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: June 5, 1989 Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject :" Variance from Noise Ordinance Recommendation: Staff recommends granting the variance from the night - 'ime noise standard for the duration of the crosstown highway road repair project with the allowing conditions: * The affected property owners are notified about the starting and completion dates of this project. * The affected property owners are notified about the dates when road surface milling will occur in their area. Info /Background: The Minnesota Department of Transportation is reguesting a variance from the nighttime noise standard to perform maintenance work on the crosstown highway between Tracy Avenue South and Highway 100. The project consists of milling the existing surface and re- surfacing with bituminous. The milling operation will take three nights to complete and will in all likelihood violate the nighttime noise standard for residents on either side of the crosstown highway. The City Council may grant a variance from the nighttime noise standard where an undue hardship exists in complying with the noise standard. In this case, it would take twice as long to complete the project if work was not allowed at night. It would create traffic congestion on a very busy highway and perhaps long delays. On the other hand, the milling operation at night will affect adjacent property owners, perhaps disrupting their sleep. This problem may be alleviated by notifying the homeowners Z advance about the road repair project. They should be advised about the starting date, ending date and what nights the milling will take place. The Minnesota Department of Transportation does not routinely notify property owners about projects this small. 0 To Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Staff recommends granting the variance from the night - 'ime noise standard for the duration of the crosstown highway road repair project with the allowing conditions: * The affected property owners are notified about the starting and completion dates of this project. * The affected property owners are notified about the dates when road surface milling will occur in their area. Info /Background: The Minnesota Department of Transportation is reguesting a variance from the nighttime noise standard to perform maintenance work on the crosstown highway between Tracy Avenue South and Highway 100. The project consists of milling the existing surface and re- surfacing with bituminous. The milling operation will take three nights to complete and will in all likelihood violate the nighttime noise standard for residents on either side of the crosstown highway. The City Council may grant a variance from the nighttime noise standard where an undue hardship exists in complying with the noise standard. In this case, it would take twice as long to complete the project if work was not allowed at night. It would create traffic congestion on a very busy highway and perhaps long delays. On the other hand, the milling operation at night will affect adjacent property owners, perhaps disrupting their sleep. This problem may be alleviated by notifying the homeowners Z advance about the road repair project. They should be advised about the starting date, ending date and what nights the milling will take place. The Minnesota Department of Transportation does not routinely notify property owners about projects this small. a� Minnesota hyo-Department of Transportation District 5 #. 2055 No. Lilac Drive TaP�y� Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422 (612) 593- 8403 May 11, 1989 Mr. Fran Hoffman Director of Public Works City of Edina - 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: S.P. 2763 (T.H. 62) From Tracy Ave. to T.H. 100 in Edina S.P. 2774 (T.H. 62) From Penn Ave. to T.H. 121 in Minneapolis and Richfield Dear Mr. Oman: It is respectfully requested that the City provide a variance to its noise ordinance to enable the Minnesota Department of Transportation to expedite this project. The project is scheduled for a June 23, 1989, letting, and will consist of milling of the existing pavement surface and resurfacing with bituminous. It will also include saw cutting for construction of loop detectors at two locations. Favorable consideration of the variance will enable us to do the project in the shortest time possible. The project is scheduled to begin about July 31, 1989, and provides eight work days for completion. The work is planned to be done during night time hours of 10 p.m. and 5:30 a.m. It is expected that the milling operations will take three nights to complete, and it is expected that the saw cutting for the loop detectors will take one night to complete. If this project were to be done during daytime hours, it would take at least twice as long to complete, cause greater traffic disruptions and cause more complaints. If you need additional information or have any questions, please contact Glen Ellis, Project Manager, at 593 -8502. Si&A� WiDi An Equal Opportunity Employer .® 155 -c o e �, ch �. �y REPORT /RECOMMENDATION \~�bitpo".�� lees To: Mayor & Council Members Agenda Item #v-,—,.G. From: Ken Rosland Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date:- J,une_2,_19.89 _Mgr -.— Recommends- ❑- T -o -HRA Subject: '"BUDGET HEARING DATES Recommendation: That the budget hearing dates be set for either July or August: Tuesday, July 11 Tuesday, August 8 Thursday, July 13 or Thursday, August 10 Tuesday, July 18 Tuesday, August 15 (5 PM - Manager's Conference Room) To Council Action Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: That the budget hearing dates be set for either July or August: Tuesday, July 11 Tuesday, August 8 Thursday, July 13 or Thursday, August 10 Tuesday, July 18 Tuesday, August 15 (5 PM - Manager's Conference Room) o e, �y • ,N�bHPON'S�C • leas , REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: K4YOR AND CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item # VII . H. From: GORDON L. HUGHES Consent ❑ ASSISTANT_ CITY MANAGER Information Only ❑ Date: JUNE 5, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: ❑ To Council 1989 - 1990 WORK PROGRAM Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Info /Background: .Attached for your review is the 1989 - 1990 Strategic Work Program. The' issues contained -in this Work Program stem from the March 11, 1989, retreat conducted by City staff and Council members. We suggest that the Council review the draft Work Program and consider its adoption at the June 19, 1989, Council meeting. CITY OF EDINA 1989 - 1990 WORK PROGRAM ISSUE #1. How can Edina maintain the quality and diversity of our housing stock and the integrity of our neighborhoods? Goal: Preserve and protect the character of Edina's residential neighborhoods and the quality of the housing stock. Focus: Edina's housing stock and residential neighborhoods are our most valuable assets. The preservation of these assets is of paramount importance. These assets are potentially threatened by two very different factors having their roots in the aging of the community. First, homes are older and therefore, more vulnerable to deferred maintenance and which may result in the deterioration of our housing stock. Second, neighborhoods are potentially impacted by demands for new housing opportunities which cannot be satisfied through traditional subdivisions. These demands for new housing can result in adverse effects on neighborhood integrity. Short -Term Objectives: Promote the maintenance and rehabilitation of housing stock through regulatory and financial incentives. Provide new standards for single family subdivision, especially in established neighborhoods. Work Program and Timetable: Adopt amendments to the Zoning /Subdivision Ordinance regulating single family subdivisions, especially subdivisions of developed lots - August, 1989. Investigate the feasibility of code compliance /truth in housing inspections prior to the sale of single family homes - September, 1989. Target CDBG loans and grants at selected neighborhoods. Pursue other home improvement loan/grant programs such as those sponsored by MHFA. Investigate home improvement programs for homes not presently owner occupied. 1989 -1990 Work Program May, 1989 Page 2 ISSUE #2 - FINANCE How can the City expand its revenue sources in light of its inability to rely on traditional methods of raising revenues? How can the Council improve its monitoring of City finances? Goal: Long term stability in City revenues with minimal reliance on other levels of government. Focus: The 1988 - 1989 Work Program identified issues relating to alternate revenue sources and the need to utilize these sources to maintain present service levels. This year's work program restates this issue. In addition, the Council expressed a desire to improve financial reporting systems to improve their monitoring of expenditures. Short Term Objectives: Identify and review the feasibility.of tapping non - traditional revenue sources for supporting the City operating budget. f Provide a financial report at the first Council meeting of each month. Work Program and Timetable: Establish a think tank of community leaders to brainstorm alternative revenue sources: Establish think tank - 9/15/89 Report - 2/15/90 Develop a financial reporting system that provides a monthly overview of the City's expenditures and revenues for Council review. Timetable: Implement System - 7/10/89 Budget Implications 1989 -1990 Work Program May, 1989 Page Three ISSUE #3: What environmental and public health hazards threaten the vitality of Edina and how can these hazards be addressed? Goal: A liveable city. Focus: As part of the 1988 -1989 Work Program, the City will commence a City -wide door -to -door recycling program to do our part in managing the regional solid waste disposal problem. The Council realizes, like solid waste, other issues threaten the livability of Edina. Among these at the local level are roadway noise and groundwater pollution. Other issues, such as AIDS /HIV are international in scope. Short Term Objectives: Divert 16% of Edina's solid waste stream for calendar year 1990. Increase AIDS /HIV awareness among all City employees. Improve the monitoring of the City's drinking water supply. Work Program: s Implement weekly pick -up recyclables for all single family and two family dwellings by July 1, 1989. • Undertake AIDS /HIV training for all City employees and adopt a workplace AIDS /HIV policy. • Test City wells twice annually for a broad spectrum of organic contaminants including volatile organic compounds (VOC) • ISSUE #4: How can the City more effectively influence public policy, especially State Tax policy, and communicate with our residents? Focus: Edina has participated for many years with the League of Minnesota Cities, Association of Metropolitan Municipalities and the Municipal Legislative Commission to advocate local 1989 -1990 Work Program May, 1989 Page Four governments, philosophies and viewpoints. Although these relationships have been and will continue to be valuable, we believe that Edina has a special story which can be a model for effective local government. This story should not only be related to our constituents, but also to other governments and policy leaders, especially those who establish policies concerning local government finance. Short Term Objective: Develop a strategy for conveying the Edina story through a multi- faceted network of local opinion leaders and government officials. Work Program: Consult with a public relations firm to develop a communication strategy. Agenda Item VII I SKATEBOARD COMPLAINTS TO THE POLICE January 1, 1983 to May 20, 1989 '83 '84 '85 '86 ** '87 '88 189 I 50th & France I I I I I I I 8 1 6 1 11 I I I I I I 4 1 I I 5 1 I I 1 1 I I Jerry's ramp I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4 I I I I I •I Cornelia Park I • I I I I I I 2 1 2 1 I I I I I I 2 1 I I 2 1 I I 1 1 I i All other locations I I I I I I 4* I 7 1 6 1 7 1 I I I I i 13 I I 8 1 I 2 1 I 4 17 14 18 19 19 4 * 1 skateboard accident (not involving motor vehicle) 04/23/83 - 11:39 PM - 55th & France Ave. S. ** June 1986 passage of ordinance restricting use in the 50th & France area. if I `^1 A. ch \N�bRPOM'�bv� �eae REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER Agenda Item # VII.J From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Consent 0 Information Only ❑ Date: JUNE 2, 19W Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: CLUB LIQUOR LICENSE AND To Council SUNDAY LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS Action a Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion - Recommendation: Approval of Liquor License Renewals for Edina Country Club and Interlachen Country Club. Info /Background: Applications for renewal of the liquor license for Edina Country Club and Interlachen Country Club have been received and reviewed by the Police Department. Copies of the Department's reports are attached... Staff recommends approval of the club liquor and Sunday liquor license renewals. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager DATE: May 31, 1989 FROM: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Liquor License Renewal - Edina Country Club The application for renewal of the on -sale license of the Edina Country Club has been received and reviewed by the Police Department. The licensees are operating within the applicable statutes and ordinances. Principals of the Club have been checked criminally and records were found to be clear. There have been no calls for service relating to violations of statutes or ordinances pertaining to the on -sale license. CRAIG SWANSON CHIEF OF POLICE CGS:nah M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager r FROM: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Liquor License Renewal - Interlachen Country Club DATE: May 31, 1989 The application for renewal of the on -sale license of the Interlachen Country Club has been received and reviewed by the Police Department. The licensees are operating within the applicable statutes and ordinances. Principals of the Club have been checked criminally and records were *found to be clear. There have been no calls for service relating to violations of statutes or ordinances pertaining to the on -sale license. CRAIG SWANSON CHIEF OF POLICE CGS:nah zr ,,; rk O, Cn • l �R ISO REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # VTTT .A From: Consent ❑ MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Information Only ❑ Date: JUNE 2, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: CHAPTER 241 LAWS OF 0 To Council MINNESOTA - TRANSIT SYSTEM Action ❑ Motion Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Council adoption of the attached resolution. Info /Background: The HRA earlier on the Agenda will consider adoption of a resolution approving Chapter 241, Minnesota Laws, 1989. The City Council must likewise adopt a similar resolution, copy of which is attached. Staff would recommend adoption. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING CHAPTER 241, MINNESOTA LAWS, 1989 The City of Edina hereby approves Chapter 241, Minnesota Laws, 1989, as required by such law and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 645.021, Subd. 2, and the City Clerk is directed to file with the Secretary of State a certificate of approval as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 645.021, Subd. 3. Attest: Dated this day of June, 1989. Mayor Clerk The Motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted and was signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. RESOLUTION APPROVING CHAPTER 241, MINNESOTA LAWS, 1989 The City of Edina hereby approves Chapter 241, Minnesota Laws, 1989, as required by law and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 645.021, Subd. 2, and the City Clerk is directed to file with the Secretary of State a certificate of approval as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 645.021, Subd. 3. Dated this 5th day of June, 1989. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor Agenda Item IX.A Dona Hiltunen 6450 York Ave. So. apt 309 Edina, Mn. 55435 May 24, 1989 Edina City Council 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, Mn. 55424 Dear Council Members: Frequently I walk from my condo apt.to Fairview Southdale Hospital, the Southdale Medical Building, or to the Marquette Bank just west of France on 65th St. Many others from the large apt. buildings on York Ave. also walk in this area. The problem is there are no sidewalks on 65th St. from Barrie Rd to France Ave. with the exception of one block (by the hospital). Isn't there some way that sidewalks can be put in at leaston one side of the street? I talked to your engineering dept and they said 51% of the property owners had to agree to this. The whole south side of 65th St.is comprised of commercial buildings and parking lots. How do you get such owners to agree to such a request? It's bad enough walking in the street in the summer time but in the winter to try and dodge cars and keep your footing is terrible. P1 ease advi se. Sincerely, Dona Hiltunen Agenda Item IX.B Water Street Clothing Co. 287 WATER STREET • EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 55331 • (612) 474 -0474 May 31, 1989 To: Mr. Mayor and City Council Members We are sending you this letter now, in the event you may wish to refer this concept to an advisory committee. On Saturday July 29, we would like to close off 50th Street between Halifax and France Avenue from 10AM- 12noon. The reason for this request is to promote a Crazy Days Festival that will include a kiddies bicycle parade, dog cart rides, pony rides, and a unicycle/ juggler /stilt walker /mime. We will also be serving sno- cones, and having a side -walk sale. A couple of years ago you approved the street closing for the Edina Art Fair on Saturday and Sunday. This has worked out quite well for all involved. We feel that Crazy Days can become a major tradition for 50th and France. We appreciate your consideration, and look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely Cl� Alan Siegman 1st Vice - President and Chairman of Advertising Committee for 50th and France Business Association. Fairview Southdale Hospital A Oiui-sion of Fairview May 25, 1989 6401 France AvenueSoutli Edina, AIN 55435 612-924.5000 Fax 612 -924 -5012 The Honorable Frederick S. Richards Mayor, City of Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Richards: Agenda Item XII.A Last week I met with Ken Rosland to discuss with him whether the City may be willing to issue hospital revenue bonds to finance improvements and equip- ment for Fairview Southdale Hospital. He suggested that I address this request to you. As you are aware, Edina has previously issued hospital revenue bonds -in 1982 and 1985 to finance improvements and equipment at Fairview Southdale Hospital. Such bonds, and the bonds proposed to be issued, are similar to industrial revenue bonds and housing revenue bonds, in that the City is not obligated to pay debt service on the bonds from taxes, the general fund or any other funds of the City. In effect, the City acts as a conduit by allowing the bonds to be issued in its name in order that interest on the bonds may be exempt fran federal income taxation. In the documents relating to the bonds Fairview will indemnify the City against any liability which may result fran the issuance of the bonds. In addition, Fairview will pay all expenses of the City in connection with the issuance of the bonds. Fairview proposes that the bonds be issued in the principal amount of approximately $16, 000,000. The improvements and equipment proposed to be financed are all located at Fairview Southdale Hospital and not at other hospitals in the Fairview system. The improvements to be financed consist of a number of remodeling projects which are underway, completed or are to be undertaken in the near future. Major construction projects include the expansion of the ICU unit, a new Cath lab, the remodeling of the emergency roan and remodeling of the labor and delivery roans and nurseries. Major items of equipment include a phone system, emergency generator and a laboratory computer. The projects to be financed do not include the medical office building or the parking ramp which are presently under construction on the Fairview Southdale campus. Fairview remains in a strong financial position as reflected by the rating on the Fairview bonds of A -1 by Moody's Investors Service and A+ by Standard & Poor's. In 1988 Fairview had net operating income of $10.0 million, which is the highest level in Fairview's history. I've enclosed a copy of our 1988 annual report for your reference. or ti - 2 - In my meeting with Ken, he mentioned that the City is facing increased budget constraints and that the Hospital may be able to assist the City with some of its public health programs. We would be happy to discuss with City officials alternatives with which the Hospital might assist. We would like to appear before the Council at its June 19th meeting to discuss our request for the issuance of the bonds. At that time representa- tives from the Hospital would be present to explain the proposed financing and answer any questions the Council may have. Should you have any questions or require any further information at this time, please call at 924 -5102. Sincerely, ?tGr -fl�t- Dougl N. Robinson Vice President & Administrator .. cc: Ken Roslund 1 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -05 -89 PAGE CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE ,156700 05/17/89 36.75 JACK WELSH INC CRAFT SUPPLIES 23- 4588 - 611 -61 06629 1487 36.75 * 156701 05/17/89 45.00 RITAS FLOWERS GENERAL SUPPLIES 23- 4504 - 611 -61 1640 45.00 * 156702 05/17/89 15.00 STATE TREASURER LICENSE RENEWAL 40 -4204- 809 -80 15.00 * 156703 05/17/89 50.00 THE WOMANS CLUB ADVERTISING 23- 4214 - 611 -61 50.00 * 156704 05/17/89 15.00 DON STODOLA WELL REFUND 10- 3095 - 490 -49 156704 05/17/89 15.00 DON STODOLA WELL REFUND 30- 3095 - 490 -49 156704 05/17/89 15.00- DON STODOLA WELL REFUND 30- 3095 - 490 -49 15.00 * 156705 05/17./89 27.36 REBECCA OLSON MILEAGE 40- 4208 - 806 -80 27.36 * 156706 05/17/89 155.45 ABLE HOSE & RUBBER HOSE 10- 4504 - 560 -56 48380 1367 155.45 * 156707 05/17/89 7.08 MOGREN BROS NOZZLES 10- 4504 - 318 -30 3794 1432 7.08 * 156708 05/19/89 317.00 THOMPSON PLBG CO REFUND 10- 3095 - 490 -49 156708 05/17/89 32.00 THOMPSON PLBG CO REFUND 10- 3130 - 490 -49 349.00 * 156709 05/17/89 29.30 BUD LARSON SALES BROOMS 10- 4580 - 301 -30 7870 152.9 29.30 * 156710 05/17/89 20.25 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP EXPRESS MAIL 10- 1145 - 000 -00 20.25 156711 05/17/89 43.00 WESTERN CONTAIN STOR BARRELS 10- 4504- 642 -64 40755 1435 43.00 156712 05/19/89 19.54 JOEL RADJENOVICH MEETING EXP 10- 4206 - 440 -44 19.54 * 156713 05/17/89 400.00 CREATIVE CONSTR EMERGENCY REPAIR 10- 4248 - 520 -52 2635 400.00 * 156714 05/17/89 46.47 BOB KOJETIN REIMBURSEMENT 10- 4504 - 643 -64 46.47 * 156715 05/17/89 447.00 EXPLORER POST 925• CAR WASHES 10- 4296 - 560 -56 447.00 * 156716 05/17/89 50.00 TCPA TCPA MEMBERSHIP 10- 4204 - 140 -14 50.00 * 156717 05/17/89 65.85 HENN CTY EMS EMERGENCY CARE 10- 4502- 440 -44 1 i \J 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -05 -89 PAGE 2 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 65.85 * 156718 05/17/89 335.00 FAITH TUNSTEAD AMBULANCE 10- 3180 - 000 -00 335.00 * * * * * ** * * * -CK,S 156721 05/19/89 839.45 NORTHWESTERN SERV CHEM H2O TREAT PUMP 28- 1300 - 000 -00 56632 1779 156721 05/19/89 84.10 NORTHWESTERN SER.V REPAIR HEATERS 28- 4248 - 702 -70 56346 1767 923.55 * 156722 05/24/89 75.52 WARNING LITES OF IL FREIGHT 10- 4504 - 325 -30 428056 1011 156722- 05/19/89 582.60 WARNING LITES OF IL BARRICADES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 427210 1011 658.12 * 156723 05/19/89 4,270.42 ENNIS PAINT MFG INC TRAFFIC PAINT 10- 4544 - 335 -30 4678 8676 4,270.42 * 156724 05/19/89 15,000.00 MN THE LANDSCAPING TREE PLATING 10- 4504 - 390 -30 3450 1303 156724 05/19/89 15,000.00- MN THE LANDSCAPING TREE PLANTING 10- 4504 - 390 -30 3450 1303 156724 05/19/89 1,500.00 MN THE LANDSCAPING TREE PLANTING 10- 4504 - 390 -30 3450 1303 1,500.00 * 156'25 05/19/89 136.00 DON ENGER CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 420 -42 136.00 * 156726 05/19/89 376.00 MARKETON BODY SHOP ENGINE'REBUILD 27- 4248 - 664 -66 376.00 * 156727 05/19/89 132.00 BUREAU OF NATIONAL SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 10- 4204 - 140 -14 751457 156727 05/19/89 596.00 BUREAU OF NATIONAL SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 10- 4204 - 140 -14 751457 728.00 * 156728 05/19/89 918.56 KENNY BOILER & MFG REPAIR BOILER VALVE 28- 4248 - 702 - 70'72744 1787 918.56 * 156729 05/19/89 9.01 A -Z RENTAL COOLER RENTAL 10- 4500 - 500 -50 2054 9.01 * 156730 05/19/89 45.70 CITY OF EDINA LIQUOR FOR RECEPTION 10- 4500 - 500 -50 45.70 * 156731 05/19/89 300.00 PASTIME GAMES PLAYGROUND GAMES 10- 4504 - 624 -62 1209 1843 300.00 * 156732 05/19/89 145.98 PRECISION LANDSCAPE TREE REMOVAL 10- 4248 - 644 -64 1643 145.98 * 156733 05/19/89 677.73 RICHARD J HERKAL ELECTION SERVICES 10- 4201 - 184 -18 156733 05/19/89 677.73- RICHARD J HERKAL ELECTION SERVICES 10- 4201 - 184 -18 156733 05/19/89 67.73 RICHARD J HERKAL ELECTION SERVICES 10- 4201- 184 -18 67.73 * 156734 05/19/89 279.04 FLORENCE NORBACK ELECTION SERVICES 10- 4201 - 184 -18 279.04 * s 06 -05 -89 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4201 - 184 -18 10- 4208 - 184 -18 10- 4156 - 510 -51 10- 1132 - 000 -00 40- 4504 - 801 -80 6973 1602 40- 4540 - 801 -80 1142 40- 4540 - 801 -80 213295 1538 25- 4900 - 002 -68 9096 1339 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4201 - 781 -78 10- 4540 - 560 -56 60681 1621 * * * -CKS 3 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 156735 05/19/89 353.70 HOWARD NORBACK ELECTION SERVICES 156735 05/19/89 22.28 HOWARD NORBACK ELECTION MILEAGE 375.98 * 156736 05/19/89 31.00 RICHARD NISSEN REBATE 31.00 * 156737 05/19/89 6,390.00 H.O.M.E. REHAB 6,390.00 * 156738 05/19/89 308.50 FILTRA TECH SYST SAND SEPAARATOR 308.50 * 156739 05/24/89 1,524.84 BARTLEY LINDSAY CO BOOST PUMP 156739 05/19/89 13.15 BARTLEY LINDSAY CO SEALS 1,537.99 * 156740 05/19/89. 1,340.35 CROWN AQUATICS INC POOL SUPPLIES 1,340.35 * 156741 05/19/89 80.00 CAROLYN LONNING PERFORMANCE 80.00 * 156742 05/19/89 100.00 PLAYWRIGHTS CENTER PERFORMANCE 100.00 * 156743 05/19/89 50.00 DIANE RAINES PERFORMANCE 50.00 * 156744 05/19/89 75.00 FRANK TONGAS PERFORMANCE 75.00 * 156745 05/19/89 80.00 JIM SCHATTAUER PERFORMANCE 80.00 * 156746 05/19/89 75.00 WEST BANK PERFORMANCE 75.00 * 156747 05/19/89 65.00 TC INSTITUTE FOR PERFORMANCE 65.00 * 156748 05/19/89 50.00 EMMET STARK PERFORMANCE 50.00 * 156749 05/19/89 50.00 FRED MASEY PERFORMANCE 50.00 * 156750 05/19/89 256.00 ROXANNE SEIDEL SERVICES 256.00 * * * * * ** 156752 05/24/89 7.50 HANCE CO BULBS 7.50 * s 06 -05 -89 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4201 - 184 -18 10- 4208 - 184 -18 10- 4156 - 510 -51 10- 1132 - 000 -00 40- 4504 - 801 -80 6973 1602 40- 4540 - 801 -80 1142 40- 4540 - 801 -80 213295 1538 25- 4900 - 002 -68 9096 1339 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4201 - 781 -78 10- 4540 - 560 -56 60681 1621 * * * -CKS 3 e d 06 -05 -89 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 28- 4224 - 701 -70 10- 4540 - 560 -56 2672 1511 10- 4504 - 100 -10 2691 2022 10- 4902 - 140 -14 1182 30- 4201 - 781 -78 30- 4504 - 782 -78 30- 4208 - 781 -78 10- 4202 - 600 -60 10- 4504 - 621 -62 497 1850 10- 4504 - 623 -62 497 1850 10- 4504 - 624 -62 497 1850 10- 4504 - 642 -64 497 1850 26- 4262 - 682 -68 497 1850 26- 4262 - 683 -68 497 1850 25- 4900 - 002 -68 15146 1252 40- 4310 - 809 -80 10- 4504 - 318 -30 25- 4924 - 520 -52 1852 27- 4201 - 662 -66 27- 4248 - 663 -66 59501 1659 2774516 - 661 -66 6478 1856 10- 4204 - 490 -49 10- 4504 - 540 -54 57408 8131 4 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 156753 05/24/89 145.55 NANCY KNUDSON ADMIN SERV 145.55 * 156754 05/24/89 136.95 TWIN CITY BEDLINER DECK 136.95 * 156755 05/30/89 965.00 CAR -TEL MOBILE COM MOBILE PHONE 156755 05/24/89 665.00 CAR -TEL MOBILE COM CAR PHONE 1,630.00 * 756 05/24/89 95.00 TC MUSICIAN UNION CONTRIBUTION 95.00 * 757 05/24/89 25.80 HOLLMAN WOODWORKING PAYMENT 25.80 * '58 05/24/89 23.76 KATHY FORD MILEAGE 23.76 * 59 05/24/89 189.75 VINCE COCKRIEL REIMBURSEMENT 189.75 * '60 05/24/89 54.80 BARRETT INC STAFF SUITS 60 05/24/89 54.80 BARRETT INC STAFF SUIT 60 05/24/89 171.25 BARRETT INC STAFF SUIT '60 05/24/89 75.35 BARRETT INC STAFF SUIT '60 05/24/89 205.50 BARRETT INC STAFF SUIT 60 05/24/89 95.90 BARRETT INC STAFF SUIT 657.60 * 61 05/24/89 604.53 MMC BASKETS 604.53 * '62 05/24/89 15.00 STATE TREAS LICENSE 15.00 * 63 05/24/89 92.58 JOE CARPENTER SPRINKLER REPAIR 92.58 * "64 05/24/89 266.98 RUDY J SOMMERS REMODELING 266.98 * '65 05/24/89 80.00 LUCY ROSCHE CLEANING 80.00 * '66 05/24/89 223.60 GOLDEN VALLEY SUPP CONTRAT REPAIRS 223.60 * 67 05/24/89 49.00 CORE RESTORE SUPPLIE 49.00 * -68 05/24/89 140.00 INTERN CONF OF BLDG SCHOOL 140.00 * 69 05/24/89 188.00 UHL CO INC GENERAL SUPPLIES e d 06 -05 -89 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 28- 4224 - 701 -70 10- 4540 - 560 -56 2672 1511 10- 4504 - 100 -10 2691 2022 10- 4902 - 140 -14 1182 30- 4201 - 781 -78 30- 4504 - 782 -78 30- 4208 - 781 -78 10- 4202 - 600 -60 10- 4504 - 621 -62 497 1850 10- 4504 - 623 -62 497 1850 10- 4504 - 624 -62 497 1850 10- 4504 - 642 -64 497 1850 26- 4262 - 682 -68 497 1850 26- 4262 - 683 -68 497 1850 25- 4900 - 002 -68 15146 1252 40- 4310 - 809 -80 10- 4504 - 318 -30 25- 4924 - 520 -52 1852 27- 4201 - 662 -66 27- 4248 - 663 -66 59501 1659 2774516 - 661 -66 6478 1856 10- 4204 - 490 -49 10- 4504 - 540 -54 57408 8131 4 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK - :- -..STER 06 -05 -89 PAGE 5 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 188.00 * 156770 05/24/89 168.00 BETSY BRYANT AC INSRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 168.00 * 156771 05/24/89 180.00 RAYMOND GORMLEY AC INSRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 180.00 * 156772 05/24/89 600.00 PAT GEISHEKER AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 600.00 * 156773 05/24/89 360.00 SUSAN FRAME AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 360.00 * 156774 05/24/89 120.00 BOBO ZINN AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 120.00 * 156775 05/24/89 168.00 CYD WICKER AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 168.00 * 156776 05/24/89 174.00 TOBIE DICKER AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 174.00 * 156777 05/24/89 600.00 PAT GEISHEKER AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 600.00 * 156778 05/24/89 456.00 BILL DIETRICHSON AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 456.00 * 156779 05/24/89 180.00 JEAN GRAPP AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201- 611 -61 180.00 * 156780 05/24/89 192.00 DOROTHY ODLAND AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 192.00 * 156781 05/24/89 1,312.00 MARGARET McDOWELL AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 1,312.00 * 156782 05/24/89 174.00 NICK LEGEROS AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201- 611 -61 174.00 * 156783 05/24/89 44.00 KATHY GUSTAFSON AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 156783 05/24/89 44.00 KATHY GUSTAFSON AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 156783 05/24/89 44.00- KATHY GUSTAFSON AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 156783 05/24/89 44.00- KATHY GUSTAFSON AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -62 156783 05/24/89 44.00 KATHY GUSTAFSON AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -62 44.00 * 156784 05/24/89 168.00 MARGARET GUST AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 168.00 * 156785 05/24/89. 210.00 PHYLLIS HAYWA AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 210.00 * 156786 05/24/89 142.50 JO RUTH AC ADMIN 23- 4120 - 611 -61 T. 4 h, 1989 CITY OF EDINA _ CHECK REGISIER 06 -05 -89 PAGE 6 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 142.50 * 156787 05/24/89 225.00 MONICA RUDQUIST AC MAINT 23- 4120 - 612 -61 156787 05/24/89 276.00 MONICA RUDQUIST AC INSSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 501.00 * 156788 05/24/89 48.00 ALAN HONN ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 48.00 * 156789 05/24/89 20.00 STEVEN KAMPER REFUND 10- 1145- 000 -00 20.00 * 156790 05/24/89 66.24 MERWYN WALKER MILEAGE 27- 4208 - 661 -66 66.24 * 156791 05/24/89 31.60 LYLE AXT REIMBURSEMENT 29- 4624 - 722 -72 31.60 * 156792 05/24/89 330.00 SPECIALIZED GRAPHIC DOOR HANGERS 40- 4248 - 801 -80 1670 1682 156792 05/30/89 175.00 SPECIALIZED GRAPHIC FLUSHING CARDS 40- 4248 - 801 -80 1670 1729 505.00 * 156793 05/24/89 27.93 MBR SEAL /WHEEL 10- 4540 - 560 -56 7279 1517 156793 05/24/89 76.34 MBR SEAL 10- 4540 - 560 -56 7432 1654 ` 104.27 * 156794 05/24/89 447.52 QUAD STATE SERV PARTS 10- 4504 - 560 -56 14549 1811 447.52 * 156795 05/25/89 17.00 BARB KRUPNICK REFUND SWIMMING 10- 3500 - 000 -00 17.00 * 156796 05/25/89 69.66 BETSY FLATEN REIMBURSEMENT 10- 2146 - 000 -00 69.66 * 156797 05/25/89 48.00 SUSAN M DAVIES ARTWORK 10- 4504 - 507 -50 48.00 * 156798 05/25/89 35.00 MOBILE CELLULAR EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274 - 420 -42 35.00 * 156799 05/25/89 1,320.00 Steven P Geiger PhD CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 1,320.00 * 156800 05/25/89 55.00 MN Asso of Women CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 0001 55.00 * 156801 05/25/89 500.00 CALIBRE PRESS CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 589109 1856 500.00 * 156802 05/25/89 163.40 PRESSWRITE TROPHIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 430 -42 1103 163.40 * 156803 05/25/89 495.00 JOHN E REID & ASSO CONT ED 1.0- 4202 - 420 -42 52753 156803 05/25/89 495.00 JOHN E REID & ASSO CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 52754 IV w- to 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK Rc:`::STER 06 -05 -89 PAGE 7 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 990.00 * 156804 05/25/89 75.00 N.T.O.A. DUES. 10- 4204 - 420 -42 75.00 * 156805 05/25/89 1,574.90 CITY OF FRIDLEY REIMBURSEMENT 10- 4266 - 420 -42 1,574.90 * 156806 05/25/89 50.00 GOVT TRAING CTR SCHOOL 10- 4202 - 420 -42 50.00 * 156807 05/25/89 907.28 NWESTERN POWER EQUI POOL PUMP PARTS 25- 4900 - 002 -68 288170 8624 156807 05/25/89 129.00 NWESTERN POWER EQUI POOL PUMP PARTS 25- 4900 - 002 -68 156807 05/25/89 86.30 NWESTERN POWER EQUI SHIPPING 25- 4900 - 002 -68 1,122.58 * PALANICCONSTRUCTION 156808 05/30/89 32,381.00 CONSTRUCTION 27- 1300 - 001 -00 156808 05/30/89 3,700.00 PALANI CONSTRUCTION EXEC BLDG 27- 1300 - 001 -00 1768 36,081.00 * 156809 05/30/89 1,340.00 FINISHING TOUCH RAIL 27- 1332 - 000 -00 1569 1,340.00 * 156810 05/30/89 1,347.50 CAROLS DRAPES DRAPES 27- 1332 - 000 -00 1249 156810 05/30/89 181.50 CAROLS DRAPES VALANCES 27- 1332 - 000 -00 1480 156810 05/30/89 471.90 CAROLS DRAPES BLINDS 27- 1332 - 000 -00 1479 2,000.90 * 156811 05/30/89 296.86 DUO CHEMINC CLEAN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 3781 1294 156811 05/30/89 88.68 DUO CHEMINC CLEAN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 3801 1119 385.54 * 156812 05/30/89 23.70 INDELCO CORP PLBG SUPPLIES 10- 4540 - 646 -64 42309 1666 23.70 * L56813 05/30/89 888.00 ST CLOUD STATE UNIV CONT ED 10- 4202 - 430 -42 888.00 * L56814 05/30/89 2,750.00 MN VALLEY FENCE CONS RETAIN WALL 27- 1300 - 001 -00 1707 2,750.00 * L56815 05/30/89 360.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYMENT 30- 3507 - 000 -00 360.00 * L56816 05/30/89 180.00 MARK PROMOTIONS ADVERTISING 30- 4214 - 781 -78 180.00 * L56817 05/30/89 32.40 SCHULTE - SCHLABAUM GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 63864 1712 32.40 * L56818 05/30/89 15,232.00 ENGCO GENERAL CONS CONSTRUCTION 60- 1300 - 005 -20 15,232.00 * L56819 05/30/89 8,000.00 PBCC I EQUIP REPLACE 10- 4901 - 420 -42 9596 8,000.00 * w- to 8 04 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -05 -89 PAGE CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O # MESSAGE 156820 05/30/89 883.00 DICTAPHONE CORP SERVICE CONTRACT 10- 4288 - 420 -42 831205 9683 156820 05/30/89 990.00 DICTAPHONE CORP EQUIP REPLACE 10- 4901- 420 -42 831205 9683 . 1,873.00 * 156821 05/30/89 290.00 R MICHAEL LUTZ CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 420 -42 290.00 * 156822 05/30/89 174.09 AM PHOTO COMP GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 F21702 174.09 * 156823 05/30/89 425.66 HENN CTY SHERIFF ROOM /BOARD 10- 4286 - 220 -22 4 -1989 425.66 * 156824 05/30/89 30.00 MN CHAPTER IAAI DUES 10- 4204 - 440 -44 30.00 * 156825 05/30/89 493.00 ATHLETIC BUSINESS CONFERENCE 10- 4206 - 140 -14 493.00 * 156826 05/30/89 267.15 CITY OF WOODBURY MEETING 10- 4206 - 140 -14 267.15 * 156827 05/30/89 1,795.00 ANDERBURG LUND PRNT ENVELOPES 10- 2148 - 000 -00 1,795.00 * 156828 05/30/89 15.00 STATE TREASURER LICENSE RENEWAL 40- 4310 - 809 -80 15.00 * 156829 05/30/89 169.45 NATL CAMERA,EXCH EQUIPMENT 10- 2148 - 000 -00 34537 169.45 * 156830 05/30/89 250.00 BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TAXES 50- 4204 - 820 -82 156830 05/30/89 250.00 BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TAXES 50- 4204 - 840 -84 156830 05/30/89 250.00 BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TAXES 50- 4204 - 860 -86 750.00 * 156831 05/30/89 300.00 HENN TECH INSTITUTE FFII TRG 10- 4202 - 440 -44 018689 1336 156831 05/30/89 72.00 HENN TECH INSTITUTE FIRE GROUND TRG 10- 4202 - 440 -44 018662 1336 372.00 * 156832 05/30/89 74.08 FIRE DEPT /PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 10- 4504 - 440 -44 74.08 * 156833 05/30/89 35.00 SUTPHEN CORP TRAINING FILM 10- 4608 - 440 -44 1859 35.00 * 156834 05/30/89 31.25 ST PAUL PIONEER ADVERTISING 27- 4600 - 661 -66 2024 31.25 * 156835 05/30/89 234.00 OLSEN FRIE PROTECT PRO SERVICES 27- 4201 - 663 -66 7838 1717 234.00 * 156836 05/30/89 900.00 PAYMENT MGMT PAVE MAGMT 10- 4201 - 260 -26 7575 9432 900.00 * 8 04 k U019►j1 128.20 285.00 413.20 * 79.91 79.91 * 175.83 175.83 * 198.20 482.48 680.68 * 28.00 28.00 * 211.00 211.00 12.50 12.50 93.40 36.60 49.00 83.86 262.86 167.78 267.60 363.51 798.89 * 188.64 188.64 * 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE k k k k k k 156A01 05/17/89 156A01 05/24/89 kkkkkk VENDOR 156AII 05/17/89 k k k k k k # MESSAGE 156A21 05/24/89 k *kkkk 156A29 05/19/89 156A29 05/25/89 156A30 05/24/89 k k k k k k 37764 156A34 05/24/89 k k k k k k 156A36 05/24/89 k k k k k k 1195 156A39 05/17/89 156A39 05/17/89 156A39 05/17/89 156A39 05/24/89 k k k k k k 156A41 05/30/89 156A41 05/17/89 156A41 05/24/89 * k * k k 156A53 05/25/89 k U019►j1 128.20 285.00 413.20 * 79.91 79.91 * 175.83 175.83 * 198.20 482.48 680.68 * 28.00 28.00 * 211.00 211.00 12.50 12.50 93.40 36.60 49.00 83.86 262.86 167.78 267.60 363.51 798.89 * 188.64 188.64 * wo. CHECK REGISTER 06 -05 -89 PAGE 9 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE ** *-CKS 3M CO LETTERS 10- 4504- 325 -30 37764 1195 3M CO SIGN MATERIAL 10- 4542 - 325 -30 37765 1195 * ** -CKS ACE SUPPLY PARTS 40- 4540- 802 -80 81906 9545 * ** -CKS ADT SECURITY SYS. ALARM SERV 30- 4304 - 782 -78 1948 * ** -CKS ALBINSON DRAFTING PENS 10- 4570 - 260 -26 551128 ALBINSON PRINTING MATERIAL 10- 4570 - 260 -26 553610 ALFONS ANDERSON BEER LINES 27- 4630 - 663 -66 * ** -CKS ALLIED PLASTICS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 390 -30 5415 1873 * ** -CKS AUTOMOTIVE WHSL INC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 90402 9!43 * ** -CKS ALTERNATOR REBUILD BATTERY 10- 4504 - 301 -30 1678 1366 ALTERNATOR REBUILD BATTERY 10- 4504 - 301 - 30'1679 1443 ALTERNATOR REBUILD STARTER PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 13074 1461 ALTERNATOR REBUILD STORAGE BINS 40- 4504 - 801 -80 1680 1600 * ** -CKS AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE FOOD /SALE 27- 4624 - 663 -66 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE FOOD 27- 4624 - 663 -66 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE FOOD 27- 4624 - 663 -66 * ** -CKS AMERICAN SHARECOM TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 wo. 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -05 -89 PAGE 10 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156A63 05/17/89 148.40 ERIC ANDERSON FMI CONVENTION 50- 4202 - 820 -82 156A63 05/17/89 148.40 ERIC ANDERSON FMI CONVENTION 50- 4202 - 840 -84 156A63 05/17/89 148.40 ERIC ANDERSON FMI CONVENTION 50- 4202 - 860 -86 445.20 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156A67 05/24/89 20.95 AQUA ENGINEERING TUBING 10- 4504 - 318 -30 20654 1661 156A67 05/17/89 60.45 AQUA ENGINEERING SPRINKLER PARTS 10- 4504 - 318 -30 20530 1311 156A67 05/17/89 38.45 AQUA ENGINEERING HOSE PARTS 40- 4504 - 803 -80 20528 1583 156A67 05/17/89 20.95 AQUA ENGINEERING HOSE 40- 4504 - 803 - 80.20529 1583 140.80 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156A91 05/17/89 120.00 AUTO - SOUND /ENTRONIX SPEEDO CHECK 10- 4248 - 560 -56 1606 120.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156A94 05/19/89 3,182.00 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CHART RECORDER 40- 4540 - 801 -80 1215 9563 3,182.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156603 05/19/89 38.95 BENSON SAFETY GLASSES 10- 4262- 301 -30 26047 156603 05/19/89 57.20 BENSON SAFETY GLASSES 10- 4262 - 301 -30 25578 156603 05/24/89 54.95 BENSON SAFETY GLASSES 10- 4262 - 646 -64 27152 156B03 05/19/89 35.51 BENSON GLASSES 10 -4262- 646 -64 88963 186.61 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156605 05/19/89 5.00 BACH -BILL UNIFORMS 30- 4262 - 782 -78 156605 05/19/89 25.00 BACH -BILL POSTAGE 30- 4290 - 781 -78 156605 05/19/89 26.53 BACH -BILL GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504- 781 -78 156605 05/19/89 8.07 BACH -BILL GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 156805 05/19/89 124.88 BACH -BILL OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 156605 05/19/89 18.40 BACH -BILL TOOLS 30- 4580 - 782 -78 207.88 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156607 05/24/89 .2,152.90 BADGER METER INC WATER METERS 40- 1220 - 000 -00 582205 156607 05/24/89 4,285.20 BADGER METER INC WATER METERS 40- 1220 - 000 -00 582943 6,438.10 * -CKS 156613 05/30/89 1,367.00 BARR ENGINEERING ENG SERV 41- 4201- 900 -90 1,367.00 * * * * * ** ,*,-CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 156618 05/24/89 82.47 156827 156618 05/17/89 27.58 05/24/89 156618 05/17/89 311.60 299.97 156618 05/17/89 321.18 156627 05/19/89 322.50 742.83 LIQUOR DEL 156622 05/19/89 196.70 196.70 156B27 05/24/89 85.14 156827 05/19/89 129.00 156827 05/24/89 235.00 156627 05/19/89 299.97 156627 05/24/89 244.00 156627 05/19/89 322.50 TRUCKING LIQUOR DEL 1,315.61 * R * * k * BERGFORD 156630 05/30/89 37.40 156630 05/30/89 85.86 156630 05/24/89 7.87- 156630 05/24/89 36.14 156630 05/24/89 6.69 156630 05/30/89 57.68 156B30 05/24/89 316.55 156630 05/24/89 43.02 156830 05/17/89 31.96 156630 05/17/89 25.20 156630 05/30/89 24.75 156B30 05/30/89 61.41 156630 05/30/89 12.00 156630 05/24/89 192.40 156630 05/30/89 22.40- 156630 05/30/89 22.4Q 156630 05/30/89 39.12 156630 05/24/89 22.40 156630 05/24/89 17.96 156630 05/24/89 3.83 BROS. INC. 1,006.50 * * * * * ** 469904 156632 05/25/89 12.35 156632 05/17/89 55.60 BERTELSON 67.95 * * * * * ** SHELF 10- 4504 - 540 -54 156642 05/24/89 35.08 CHECK REGTI 7TER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION BATTERY WAREHOUSE BATTERY BATTERY WAREHOUSE BRAKE SHOES BATTERY WAREHOUSE FREON BATTERY WAREHOUSE BATTERIES Is 06 -05 -89 PAGE 11 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 37490 1519 10- 4540 - 560 -56 31743 1276. 10- 4540 - 560 -56 34892 1277 10- 4540 - 560 -56 36755 1445 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 27- 4630 - 667 -66 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DEL 50- 4626 - 822 -82 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DEL 50- 4626 - 822 -82 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DEL 50- 4626 - 842 -84 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DEL 50- 4626 - 842 -84 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DEL 50- 4626 - 862 -86 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DEL 50- 4626 - 862 -86 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 160 -16 471546 BERTELSON BROS. INC. SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 260 -26 471666 BERTELSON BROS. INC. CREDIT 10- 4504 - 510 -51 462342 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 466238 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 465498 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 471546 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 469904 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 468185 BERTELSON BROS. INC. SHELF 10- 4504 - 540 -54 463547 1375 BERTELSON BROS. INC. TRAYS 10- 4504 - 540 -54 462724 1300 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 440 -44 467379 1333 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 600 -60 471546 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 600 -60 471546 BERTELSON BROS. INC. SIGNS 25- 4924 - 520 -52 467159 1853 BERTELSON BROS. INC. LETTERS 27- 4516- 661 -66 469732 BERTELSON BROS. INC. LETTERS 27- 4516 - 661 -66 470544 BERTELSON BROS. INC. STAPLERS 27- 4516 - 661 -66 471546 BERTELSON BROS. INC., SIGN LETTERS 27- 4540 - 666 -66 469732 BERTELSON BROS. INC. STAPLER 30- 4504 - 781 -78 468186 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLYS 30- 4516 - 781 -78 469409 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS GENERAL SUPPLIES BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS CORE /KEYS BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 92169 10- 4540 - 520 -52 91992 1532 30- 4516 - 781 -78 883040 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 06 -05 -89 PAGE 12 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 30- 4504 - 783 -78 31011 1773 30- 4504 - 783 -78 31095 1897 10- 2149 - 000 -00 813208 1776 * ** -CKS 10- 4534 - 310 -30 3619 9954 10- 4536 - 310 -30 3634 1385 * ** -CKS 10- 2146 - 000 -00 10- 4212- 510 -51 10- 4500 - 500 -50 1882 * ** -CKS 10- 4512 - 520 -52 123992 1477 * ** -CKS 27- 1300 - 003 -00 53833 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 642 -64 E420 1685 * ** -CKS 23- 4624 - 613 -61 086546 1483 23- 4624 - 613 -61 086547 1484 * ** -CKS 10- 2148 - 000 -00 10- 2148 - 000 -00 10- 2148 - 000 -00 10- 2148 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 18362 1534 • 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 35.08 * * * * ** ' 156653 05/24/89 54.00 BAKER POOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES 156853 05/24/89 34.90 BAKER POOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES 88.90 * 156854 05/25/89 193.26 BLUMBERG PHOTO CABLE TV 193.26 * * * * * ** 156662 05/24/89 297.91, BOYUM EQUIPMENT BROOMS 156862 05/24/89 295.08 BOYUM EQUIPMENT SHOES 592.99 * * * * ** 156872 05/24/89 23.00 BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE MTG EXP 156872 05/24/89 65.35 BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE TRAINING EXP 156872 05/24/89 135.00 BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE ROOM RENTAL 223.35 * 156878 05/19/89 24.36 BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC P.T.E. CLEANER 24.36 * * * * * ** 156881 05/30/89 4,054.45 BRW INC. ENGINEERING FEES 4,054.45 * * * * ** 156683 05/17/89 158.53 BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC FIELD MIX 158.53 * * * * ** 156C01 05/17/89 76.68 C & S DISTRIBUTING COST OF COMM 156C01 05/17/89 274.71 C & S DISTRIBUTING COST OF COMM 351.39 * * * * ** 156C05 05/30/89 34.91 CAMPBELL -RALPH MRG EXP LOGIS 156C05 05/30/89 395.00 CAMPBELL -RALPH LASER POINTER 156C05 05/30/89 125.00 CAMPBELL -RALPH MEETING EXP 156C05 05/30/89 53.97 CAMPBELL -RALPH REIMBURSEMENT 608.88 * * * * ** 156C08 05/24/89 334.52 CARLSON LK ST EQUIP. BRAKE REPAIR 06 -05 -89 PAGE 12 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 30- 4504 - 783 -78 31011 1773 30- 4504 - 783 -78 31095 1897 10- 2149 - 000 -00 813208 1776 * ** -CKS 10- 4534 - 310 -30 3619 9954 10- 4536 - 310 -30 3634 1385 * ** -CKS 10- 2146 - 000 -00 10- 4212- 510 -51 10- 4500 - 500 -50 1882 * ** -CKS 10- 4512 - 520 -52 123992 1477 * ** -CKS 27- 1300 - 003 -00 53833 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 642 -64 E420 1685 * ** -CKS 23- 4624 - 613 -61 086546 1483 23- 4624 - 613 -61 086547 1484 * ** -CKS 10- 2148 - 000 -00 10- 2148 - 000 -00 10- 2148 - 000 -00 10- 2148 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 18362 1534 • / CHECK Rc:_:.'TER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION CARLSON LK ST EQUIP. PARTS CORNER MARKING CO SIGNS CORNER MARKING CO SIGN CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO ADS FOR BIDS CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO, ADS FOR BIDS CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO ADVERTISING (2 checks) CITY OF EDINA WATER CITY OF EDINA WATER CITY OF EDINA LIFEGUARD SEMINAR CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP PAL ALARMS CLEAN -FLO LAB WEED CONTROL CLEAN -FLO LAB IMPROVEMENTS CURTIN MATHESON SCI LAB SUPPLIES CURTIN MATHESON SCI LAB SUPPLIES CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. CUSHMAN PARTS D. C. HEY CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES D. C. HEY CO. SERVICE CONTRACT DAVIS- EUGENE WEED CONTROL DAVIS- EUGENE MILEAGE *01 0 06 -05 -89 PAGE 13 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 51572 1295 * ** -CKS 27- 4504 - 662 -66 1795 27- 4504 - 666 -66 8933 1355 * ** -CKS 10- 4210 - 140 -14 99058 10- 4210 - 140 -14 99459 30- 4214 - 781 -78 99932 1963 * ** -CKS 10- 4258 - 446 -44 10- 4258- 646 -64 26- 4202 - 681 -68 " ** -CKS 10- 4574 - 440 -44 49412 1576 10- 4264- 358 -30 4917 10- 4264 - 358 -30 4934 9248 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 482 -48 1702 10- 4504 - 482 -48 323764 * ** -CKS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 17257 1507 * ** -CKS 28- 4504 - 702 -70 110691 1504 30- 4288 - 781 -78 113458 1967 10- 4201 - 600 -60 10- 4208 - 600 -60 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 156CO8 05/17/89 56.76 391.28 * kkkkkk 156C12 05/30/89 86.40 156C12 05/30/89 32.75 119.15 * k k k k k k 156C25 05/19/89 95.40 156C25 05/24/89 77.40 156C25 05/30/89 53.04 225.84 kkkkkk 156C33 05/25/89 151.90 156C33 05/25/89 27.10 156C33 05/17/89 30.00 209.00 kkkkkk 156C38 05/30/89 528.50 528.50 156C39 05/24/89 56.00 156C39 05/25/89 2,646.67 2,702.67 kkkkkk 156C87 05/19/89 377.70 156C87 05/25/89 35.41 413.11 k k k k k k 156C89 05/24/89 21.15 21.15 k k k k k k 156DO7 05/19/89 100.00 156DO7 05/30/89 50.09 150.09 k k k k k k 156D33 05/30/89 309.75 156D33 05/30/89 53.52 363.27 k k k k k k / CHECK Rc:_:.'TER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION CARLSON LK ST EQUIP. PARTS CORNER MARKING CO SIGNS CORNER MARKING CO SIGN CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO ADS FOR BIDS CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO, ADS FOR BIDS CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO ADVERTISING (2 checks) CITY OF EDINA WATER CITY OF EDINA WATER CITY OF EDINA LIFEGUARD SEMINAR CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP PAL ALARMS CLEAN -FLO LAB WEED CONTROL CLEAN -FLO LAB IMPROVEMENTS CURTIN MATHESON SCI LAB SUPPLIES CURTIN MATHESON SCI LAB SUPPLIES CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. CUSHMAN PARTS D. C. HEY CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES D. C. HEY CO. SERVICE CONTRACT DAVIS- EUGENE WEED CONTROL DAVIS- EUGENE MILEAGE *01 0 06 -05 -89 PAGE 13 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 51572 1295 * ** -CKS 27- 4504 - 662 -66 1795 27- 4504 - 666 -66 8933 1355 * ** -CKS 10- 4210 - 140 -14 99058 10- 4210 - 140 -14 99459 30- 4214 - 781 -78 99932 1963 * ** -CKS 10- 4258 - 446 -44 10- 4258- 646 -64 26- 4202 - 681 -68 " ** -CKS 10- 4574 - 440 -44 49412 1576 10- 4264- 358 -30 4917 10- 4264 - 358 -30 4934 9248 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 482 -48 1702 10- 4504 - 482 -48 323764 * ** -CKS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 17257 1507 * ** -CKS 28- 4504 - 702 -70 110691 1504 30- 4288 - 781 -78 113458 1967 10- 4201 - 600 -60 10- 4208 - 600 -60 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS ucr'� 06 -05 -89 PAGE 14 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4580 - 560 -56 28330 1428 * ** —CKS 26- 4564 - 682 -68 710843 1057 * ** —CKS 10- 4504- 510 -51 910321 1777 10- 4504 - 510 -51 910321 1777 10- 4504 - 510 -51 910321 1777 10- 4504 - 600 -60 910321 1777 * ** —CKS 10- 4504 - 647. -64 87192 1372 10- 4542 - 325 -30 87468 9885 27- 4504 - 666 -66 87627 1946 * ** —CKS 30- 4288 - 782 -78 03830 1989 CITY OF EDINA * ** —CKS CHECK REGISTER 9167 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 156D45 05/17/89. 66.44 DELEGARD TOOL CO. TOOLS 10- 4504 - 440 -44 66.44 * * * * * ** * ** —CKS 10- 4500 - 500 -50 156D65 05/25/89 108.00 DIXIE PETRO —CHEM INC POOL CHEMICALS 108.00 * * ** —CKS * * * * ** 102804 9778 10- 4540 - 560 -56 156D85 05/30/89 99.32 DUFFEY PAPER CO. PAPER 156D85 05/30/89 112.00— DUFFEY PAPER CO. PAPER 156D85 05/30/89 112.00 DUFFEY PAPER CO. PAPER 156D85 05/30/89 112.04 DUFFEY PAPER CO. DUFFEY PAPER * * * * ** 211.36 156E14 05/17/89 139.90 EARL F. ANDERSON PAINT FOR TRAILS 156E14 05/24/89 118.80 EARL F. ANDERSON SIGN MATERIAL 156E14 05/30/89 118.16 EARL F. ANDERSON SIGNS 376.86 * * * * ** 156E20 05/24/89 85.00 ECOLAB PEST ELIM. SERVICE CONTRACT 85.00 ** * * ** 156E69 05/17/89 738.00 ELSMORE AQUATIC LIFEGUARDS SUITS 156E69 05/24/89 42.00 ELSMORE AQUATIC STAFF SUIT 780.00 * * * * ** 156E71 05/30/89 31.81 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY EAR PLUGS 31.81 * * * * ** 156E75 05/19/89 500.00 EMPLOYEES CLUB REIMBURSEMENT 156E75 05/30/89 230.00 EMPLOYEES CLUB SUPPLIES 730.00 * * * * ** 156E81 05/24/89 6.4.7 ENGINE PARTS SUPPLY PARTS - 156E81 05/24/89 46.37 ENGINE PARTS SUPPLY PARTS 52.84 * * * * ** 156F02 05/24/89 Y 91.13 FACILITY SYSTEMS REMODELING ucr'� 06 -05 -89 PAGE 14 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4580 - 560 -56 28330 1428 * ** —CKS 26- 4564 - 682 -68 710843 1057 * ** —CKS 10- 4504- 510 -51 910321 1777 10- 4504 - 510 -51 910321 1777 10- 4504 - 510 -51 910321 1777 10- 4504 - 600 -60 910321 1777 * ** —CKS 10- 4504 - 647. -64 87192 1372 10- 4542 - 325 -30 87468 9885 27- 4504 - 666 -66 87627 1946 * ** —CKS 30- 4288 - 782 -78 03830 * ** —CKS 26- 4262 - 682 -68 9167 1695 26 -4262- 682 -68 9210 * ** —CKS 10- 4504 - 440 -44 1332 * ** —CKS 10- 4500 - 500 -50 10- 4504 - 500 -50 * ** —CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 102804 9778 10- 4540 - 560 -56 102584 1028 * ** —CKS 25- 4924 - 520 - 52.37004 1854 f 06 -05 -89 PAGE 15 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 25- 4924 - 520 -52 36909 25- 4924 - 520 -52 37002 25- 4924 - 520 -52 36999 1854 25- 4924 - 520 -52 37003 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 420 -42 10- 4201 - 420 -42 * ** -CKS 26- 4564 - 682 -68 122034 1056 40- 4622 - 805 -80 121710 1670 40 -4622- 805 -80 122100 40- 4622 - 805 -80 121103 **A-CKS 40- 4540 - 810 -80 2812 1826 * ** -CKS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 90028 1505 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 57518 9960 * ** -CKS 30- 4504 - 782 -78 10672 8371 **k-CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 1364 * ** -CKS 10- 4202 - 420 -42 5788 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 510 -51 125153 * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 156F02 05/24/89 35.00 FACILITY SYSTEMS REMODELING 156F02 05/24/89 10.13 FACILITY SYSTEMS REMODELING 156F02 05/24/89 338.40 FACILITY SYSTEMS REMODELING 156F02 05/24/89 30.38 FACILITY SYSTEMS REMODELING 505.04 k k k k k k 156F08 05/25/89 49.00 FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL PRO SERV 156F08 05/25/89 49.00 FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL PRO SERV 98.00 kkkkkk 156F11 05/25/89 626.49 FEED RITE CONTROL CHLORINE 156F11 05/24/89 2,274.34 FEED RITE CONTROL WATER CHEMICALS 156F11 05/30/89 966.97 FEED RITE CONTROL WATER CHEM 156F11 05/17/89 482.20 FEED RITE CONTROL WATER CHEM 4,350.00 * k k k k k k 156F26 05/24/89 100.98 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL ICE MACHINE PARTS 100.98 * k k k k k k 156F47 05/17/89 10.03 8.8a FOWLER ELECTRIC PARTS 10.03* 8.8a* k k * k k 156F50 05/17/89 6.24 FRED G ANDERSON PAINT 6.24 * kkkkkk 156F59 05/24/89 8.85 FRANK J. ZAMBONI GENERAL SUPPLIES 8.85 * kkkkkk 156F76 05/17/89 23.67 FLAHERTY EQUIP CORP PAINTS 23.67 * kkkkkk 156G09 05/25/89 285.00 GOVT TRAIN SERV CONT ED 285.00 * k *kkkk 156G22 05/17/89 109.40 GENERAL BINDING LAMINATING SUPPLYS 109.40 * kkkkkk f 06 -05 -89 PAGE 15 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 25- 4924 - 520 -52 36909 25- 4924 - 520 -52 37002 25- 4924 - 520 -52 36999 1854 25- 4924 - 520 -52 37003 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 420 -42 10- 4201 - 420 -42 * ** -CKS 26- 4564 - 682 -68 122034 1056 40- 4622 - 805 -80 121710 1670 40 -4622- 805 -80 122100 40- 4622 - 805 -80 121103 **A-CKS 40- 4540 - 810 -80 2812 1826 * ** -CKS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 90028 1505 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 57518 9960 * ** -CKS 30- 4504 - 782 -78 10672 8371 **k-CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 1364 * ** -CKS 10- 4202 - 420 -42 5788 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 510 -51 125153 * ** -CKS 06 -05 -89 PAGE 16 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4226 - 301 -30 30983 10- 4248 - 440 -44 48825 1325 10- 4294 - 560 -56 30982 27- 4504 - 666 -66 48824 1403 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 420 -42 10- 4504 - 420 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 325 -30 489134 -10- 4504 - 325 -32 489134 10- 4504 - 325 -32 48913.4 10- 4504 - 646 -64 489134 40- 4504 - 801 -80 489134 30- 3512 - 000 -00 -* -CKS 29- 4572 - 722 -72 74571 1771 x ** -CKS 40- 4504 - 806 -80 1835 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 560 -56 370689 1598 * ** -CKS 27- 4612 - 664 -66 1388 1709 * ** -CKS 27- 4624 - 663 -66 - ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 833162 1531 10- 4540 - 520 -52 834164 1586 10- 4540 - 540 -54 837032 1617 4 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 156G24 05/17/89 19.00 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS RENTAL 156G24 05/30/89 41.00 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS GE REPAIR 156G24 05- /17/89 266.25 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS MAINT 156G24 05/17/89 260.40 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS SUPPLIES * * * * ** 586.65 * 156G26 05/25/89 11.67 GENERAL OFFICE PROD GENERAL SUPPLIES 156G26 05/25/89 52.74 GENERAL OFFICE PROD GENERAL SUPPLIES 64.41 * * * * * ** 156G32 05/17/89 82.00 GOPHER STATE 1 CALL LOCATE 156G32 05/17/89 82.00- GOPHER STATE 1 CALL LOCATE 156G32 05/17/89 82.00 GOPHER STATE 1 CALL LOCATE 156G32 05/17/89 82.00 GOPHER STATE 1 CALL LOCATE 156G32 05/17/89 661.54 GOPHER STATE 1 CALL LOCATE 825.54 * 156G33. 05/17/89 244.00 GEREBI -LIZ SERVICES * * * * ** 244.00 * 156G42 05/24/89 153.69 GIL HEBARD GUNS TARGETS 153.69 156G52 05/30/89 23.28 GOODIN CO. FAUCET ****** 23.28 156G57 05/24/89 212.00 GOPHER OIL CO. FLOOR DRI 212.00 * * * * ** 156G60 05/17/89 448.54 GORDON SMITH CO. GAS 448.54 156G62 05/30/89 102.00 GRANDMA S CUPBOARD POPCORN 102.00 * * * * ** 156G68 05/17/89 23.52 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. PARTS 156G68 05/17/89 174.20 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. FILTER /SEALS 156G68 05/17/89 30.20 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. ELEC PARTS 06 -05 -89 PAGE 16 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4226 - 301 -30 30983 10- 4248 - 440 -44 48825 1325 10- 4294 - 560 -56 30982 27- 4504 - 666 -66 48824 1403 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 420 -42 10- 4504 - 420 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 325 -30 489134 -10- 4504 - 325 -32 489134 10- 4504 - 325 -32 48913.4 10- 4504 - 646 -64 489134 40- 4504 - 801 -80 489134 30- 3512 - 000 -00 -* -CKS 29- 4572 - 722 -72 74571 1771 x ** -CKS 40- 4504 - 806 -80 1835 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 560 -56 370689 1598 * ** -CKS 27- 4612 - 664 -66 1388 1709 * ** -CKS 27- 4624 - 663 -66 - ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 833162 1531 10- 4540 - 520 -52 834164 1586 10- 4540 - 540 -54 837032 1617 4 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 156G68 05/17/89 156G68 05/17/89 k k k* k k NED 156G76 05/24/89 k * *kkk 10- 4540 - 520 -52 156G79 05/30/89 k k k k k NED 156H09 05/24/89 k k k k k k 10- 4540 - 520 -52 156H19 05/17/89 156Hd9 05/17/89 156H19 05/17/89 156H19 05/17/89 156H19 05/17/89 kkkkkk NED 156H21 05/17/89 156H21 05/17/89 156H21 05/24/89 156H21 05/17/89 156H21 05/24/89 k k k k k k HODES CO. 156H56 05/24/89 k k k k k k 1578 156H61 05/24/89 156H61 05/17/89 kkkkkk 156H63 05/24/89 156H63 05/24/89 156H63 05/24/89 156H63 05/24/89 �40' AMOUNT 22.78 57.43 308.13 * 92.65 92.65 * 8,799.75 8,799.75 * 332.75 332.75 * 186.46 482.50 357.50 163.80 37.20 1,227.46 128.46 128.46 191.61 128.46 55 :,71 632.70 24.98 24.98 19.95 40.11 60.06 71.64 20.36- 20.36 20.36 92.00 CHECK RE: _"STER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. PARTS GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. FLASHLITES 06 -05 -89 PAGE 17 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 832403 9612 40- 4504 - 801 -80 821037 9572 GREEN ACRES SPRNKLR. SPRINKLER REPAIR 10- 4504 - 318 -30 GREUPNER -JOE LESSONS 27- 3417 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS HALLMAN OIL 27- 4504- 664 -66 44639 1788 ** *-CKS HAR NED LUMBER CO. CEDAR MATERIAL 10- 4504 - 318 -30 38628 1363 HAR NED LUMBER CO. TILES 10- 4540 - 520 -52 38024 9962 HAR NED LUMBER CO. CEILING TILE 10- 4540 - 520 -52 38048 9962 HAR NED LUMBER CO. DOORS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 38270 1109 HAR NED LUMBER CO. MATERIAL 10- 4540 - 520 -52 38494 1181 * ** -CKS HARMON GLASS GLASS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 183148 1450 HARMON GLASS GLASS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 183150 1451 HARMON GLASS WINDSHIELD 10- 4248 - 560 -56 183172 1524 HARMON GLASS GLASS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 183149 1449 HARMON GLASS GLASS 10- 4504- 646 -64 183190 1530 * ** -CKS HIRSHFIELDS PAINT 10- 4540 - 520 -52 445406.1441 * ** -CKS HODES CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 78631 HODES CO. REPAIR PARTS 30- 4540- 782 -78 78631 1578 HOFFERS INC PLEXI GLASS 27- 4516 - 661 -66 121339 1793 HOFFERS INC DOOR REPAIR 50- 4274 - 860 -86 120194 1611 HOFFERS INC DOOR REPAIR 50- 4274 - 860 -86 120194 1611 HOFFERS INC DOOR REPAIR 50- 4274 - 861 -86 120194 1611 * ** -CKS , 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGI,.- ER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 156H85 * * k 156I59 156I78 156J27 156J27 156J27 156J31 156J31 156J31 156J31 156J31 156J31 156J31 156J31 156J31 156J31 156J31 156J31 156J31 156J31 156J31 156J31 156J31 156J31 156J31 156J31 156J31 156J31 156J31 156J31 156J31 156J31 156J31 156J31 156J31 156J31 05/17/89 276.00 HUMPHREY RADIATOR 276.00 * 05/25/89 64.50 INTERIOR COM SYS 64.50 05/19/89 32.96 ISIA 32.96 RADIATOR EQUIP MAINT PAPER SUPPLIES 06 -05 -89 PAGE 18 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10- 4274 - 420 -42 23898 28- 4516 - 701 -70 021488 1164 05/30/89 O1 JERRYS FOODS MEETING EXP 10 -4206- 440 -44 05/19/89 JERRYS FOODS FOOD 10- 4500- 500 -50 05/17/89 0 JERRYS FOODS GENERAL SUPPLIES 23 =4504- 611 -61 601.83 05/17/89 3.89 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 260 -26 05/17/89 19.48 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 05/17/89 37.93 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 318 -30 05/17/89 23.02 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 322 -30 05/17/89 88.15 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 325 -30 05/17/89 28.15 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 05/17/89 54.51 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 05/17/89 335.50 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 440 -44 05/17/89 11.41 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 482 -48 05/17/89 37.14 JERRYS HARDWARE REPAIR PARTS 10 -4504- 507 -50 05/17/89 172.30 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 520 -52 05/17/89 20.36 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 540 -54 05/17/89 106.81 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 560 -56 05/17/89 17.74 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 624 -62 05/17/89 152.41 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 05/17/89 27.73 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 05/17/89 100.00 JERRYS HARDWARE TOOLS 10- 4580 - 560 -56 05/17/89 329.00 JERRYS HARDWARE EQUIPMENT 10- 4901 - 440 -44 05/17/89 74.18 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 23- 4504 - 612 -61 05/17/89 74.18- JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 612 -61 05/17/89 74.18 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 612 -61 05/17/89 41.73 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 661 -66 05/17/89 14.49 JERRYS HARDWARE REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 662 -66 05/17/89 104.77 JERRYS HARDWARE REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540- 665 -66 05/17/89 65.64 JERRYS HARDWARE PAINT 27- 4544 - 662 -66 05/17/89 44.03 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 702 -70 05/17/89 16.13 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 29- 4504 - 721 -72 05/17/89 5 3.96 JERRYS HARDWARE PAINT 30- 4544- 782 -78 05/17/89 37.82 JERRYS HARDWARE EQUIP MAINT 40- 4274 - 803 -80 05/17/89 18.64 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 A * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK RE,-;::STER 06 -05 -89 PAGE 19 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 156431 05/17/89 81.95 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 156J31 05/17/89 23.59- JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 807 -80 156J31 05/17/89 15.78 JERRYS HARDWARE REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 807 -80 2,140.24 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156J35 05/30/89 78.03 JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING 10- 2148 - 000 -00 156J35 05/30/89 21.68 JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING 10- 4201 - 500 -50 3905 156J35 05/30/89 7.18 JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING 10- 4201 - 500 -50 19653 156J35 05/30/89 71.00 JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING 10- 4600 - 140 -14 4969 156J35 05/30/89 78.96 JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING 10- 4600 - 140 -1.4 19799 156J35 05/30/89 34.44 JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING 10- 4600 - 480 -48 6092 156J35 05/30/89 33.18 JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING 10- 4600- 480 -48 4321 156J35 05/17/89 152.06 JERRYS PRINTING PHOTO COPYING 10- 4600 - 600 -60 5709 476.53 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156J74 05/24/89 118.56 JUSTUS LUMBER REPAIR PARTS 10- 4504 - 318 -30 82516 1388 156J74 05/24/89 202.57 JUSTUS LUMBER FORM MATERIAL 10- 4540 - 520 -52 89696 1429 156J74 05/24/89 42.24 JUSTUS LUMBER MATERIAL 10- 4540 - 520 -52 81534 1288 363.37 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156K05 05/30/89 337.55 K & K SALES DOOR FOR POOL 10- 4504 - 646 -64 33562 1721 337.55 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156K09 05/17/89 49.24- KAMAN BEARING & SPLY CREDIT 10- 4540 - 560 -56 662528 1286 156K09 05/17/89 49.24 KAMAN BEARING & SPLY PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 662267 1286 156K09 05/24/89 81.79 KAMAN BEARING & SPLY BEARINGS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 663742 1594 156K09 05/17/89 51.19 KAMAN BEARING & SPLY PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 662515 1286 132.98 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156K35 05/17/89 32.97 KNOX COMM CREDIT MATERIALS 10- 4504 - 318 -30 436642 1387 156K35 05/30/89 17.26 KNOX COMM CREDIT HARDWARE 10- 4504 - 646 -64 477129 1671 156K35 05/17/89 24.92 KNOX COMM CREDIT HARDWARE 10- 4504 - 646 -64 436582 1462 156K35 05/17/89 47.35 KNOX COMM CREDIT MATERIAL 10- 4540 - 520 -52 436583 1466 156K35 05/17/89 56.56 KNOX COMM CREDIT REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 436382 1593 156K35 05/17/89 45.28 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER 10- 4604 - 646 -64 436279 1523 156K35 05/17/89 11.44 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER 10- 4604 - 646 -64 439195 1686 156K35 05/30/89 62.07 KNOX COMM CREDIT SUPPLIES 26- 4504 - 682 -68 476895 1812 156K35 05/30/89 115.90 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER 27- 4604 - 664 -66 476886 1797 156K35 05/30/89 11.25 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER 27- 4604- 664 -66 476888 1797 156K35 05/17/89 39.94 KNOX COMM CREDIT PARTS FOR SHOP 40- 4504 - 802 -80 439285 1605 156K35 05/17/89 9.58 KNOX COMM CREDIT PARTS FOR SHOP 40- 4504 - 802 -80 439221 1610 156K35 05/24/89 85.20 KNOX COMM CREDIT PUMPHOUSE PARTS 40- 4540 - 802 -80 477226 1672 156K35 05/17/89 53.03 KNOX COMM CREDIT: PUMPHOUSE PARTS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 436369 1582 612.75 * * * * ** * ** -CKS M � 06 -05 -89 PAGE 20 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4208 - 160 -16 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 140 -14 10- 4248 - 560 -56 4888 1600 10- 4248 - 560 -56 4870 1539 10- 4248 - 560 -56 4889 1211 10- 4504 - 301 -30 9466 10- 4504 - 318 -30 9731 10- 4504 - 322 -30 1549 10- 4504 - 325 -30 1989 CITY OF EDINA 1135 10- 4504 - 646 -64 1361 CHECK REGI";' R 1235 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 1560 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 156K38 05/30/89 19.44 1362 KNUTSON -JIM MILEAGE 40- 4540 - 801 -80 1456 19.44 1134 40- 4540 - 803 -80 1547 40- 4540 - 803 -80 * * * * ** 40- 4540 - 803 -80 1359 156L02 05/24/89 1,008.95, LABOR RELATIONS ASN. FEE FOR SERVICE 1,008.95 * * * * ** 156L04 05/24/89 488.21 LAHASS CORPORATION INSPECTION 156L04 05/24/89 160.80 LAHASS CORPORATION REPAIR HOIST 156L04 05/24/89 2,891.50 LAHASS CORPORATION REPAIRS 3,540.51 * * * * ** 156L28 05/24/89 72.00 LAWSON PRODUCTS BOLTS 156L28 05/24/89 '173.26 LAWSON PRODUCTS SPEC BOLTS 156L28 05/24/89 159.51 LAWSON PRODUCTS FIXTURE PARTS 156L28 05/24/89 224.96 LAWSON PRODUCTS RIVETS ` 156L28 05/17/89 126.73 LAWSON PRODUCTS SUPPLIES 156L28 05/24/89 345.05 LAWSON PRODUCTS FASTENERS 156L28 05/17/89 88.81 LAWSON PRODUCTS BOLTS 156L28 05/19/89 517.29 LAWSON PRODUCTS BOLTS 156L28 05/24/89 453.10 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 156L28 05/24/89 455.22 LAWSON PRODUCTS STACK 156L28 05/17/89 62.00 LAWSON PRODUCTS BOLTS 156L28 05/24/89 275.33 LAWSON PRODUCTS BOLTS 156L28 05/17/89 144.00 LAWSON PRODUCTS BOLTS 156L28 05/24/89 457.32 LAWSON PRODUCTS BOLTS 156L28 05/17/89 402.63 LAWSON PRODUCTS SUPPLIES 156L28 05/24/89 159.87 LAWSON PRODUCTS CONNECTORS 156L28 05/19/89 638.47 LAWSON PRODUCTS SPEC BOLTS 156L28 05/24/89 639.40 LAWSON PRODUCTS HYD REPAIR PARTS .5,394.95 156L30 05/30/89 409.34 LAYNE MINNESOTA CO. METERING PUMP 409.34 156L34 05/17/89 30.90 LEEF BROS. INC. CONT EQUIP 30:90 * * * * ** 156L52 05/17/89 183.55 7°�4 ss LINJO ASSOC WATER TREATMENT 183.55" * * * * ** 156L56 05/17/89 7.00 LINHOFF DEVELOP FILM M � 06 -05 -89 PAGE 20 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4208 - 160 -16 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 140 -14 10- 4248 - 560 -56 4888 1600 10- 4248 - 560 -56 4870 1539 10- 4248 - 560 -56 4889 1211 10- 4504 - 301 -30 9466 10- 4504 - 318 -30 9731 10- 4504 - 322 -30 1549 10- 4504 - 325 -30 1360 10- 4504 - 646 -64 1135 10- 4504 - 646 -64 1361 10- 4540 - 560 -56 1235 10- 4540 - 560 -56 9947 10- 4620 - 560 -56 1560 10- 4620 - 560 -56 1458 10- 4620 - 560 -56 9949 10- 4620 - 560 -56 1362 10- 4620 - 560 -56 9710 40- 4540 - 801 -80 1456 40- 4540 - 803 -80 1134 40- 4540 - 803 -80 1547 40- 4540 - 803 -80 1133 40- 4540 - 803 -80 1359 40- 4540 - 801 -80 10867 1841 23- 4201 - 612 -61 30- 4564 - 783 -78 12004 1418 10- 4504 - 260 -26 151168 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA * ** -CKS CHECK RE..:STER 83626 1590 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 156L56 05/17/89 21.00 LINHOFF DEVELOP FILM 156L56 05/19/89 9.70 LINHOFF DEVELOP FILM 156L56 05/19/89 20.00 LINHOFF DEVELOP FILM 57.70 * ** -CKS * * * * ** 146373 156L60 05/30/89 2,503.88 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 156L60 05/30/89 2,356.56 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 156L60 05/30/89 2,644.54 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 156L60 05/30/89 1,384.30 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 156L60 05/30/89 312.76 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 156L60 05/30/89 312.75 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 156L60 05/30/89 312.75 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 9,827.54 * * * * ** 156L66 05/17/89 127.95 LONG LAKE FORD TRACT REPAIRS 127.95 * * * * * ** 156M01 05/17/89 195.10 M & I IND SUPPLY SUPPLIES 195.10 * 156M02 05/17/89 45.33 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. PARTS 156M02 05/24/89 80.22 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. SHACK 156M02 05/24/89 141.96 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. PARTS 267.51 * * * * * ** 156M08 05/30/89 353.99 MARLIN INDUS. DIV. TRAINING AIDS 353.99 * * * * * ** 156M18 05/19/89 77.60 MCGARVEY COFFEE COFFEE 77.60 * * * * * ** 156M22 .05/17/89 50.70 MCNEILUS STEEL STEEL 156M22 05/24/89 32.70 MCNEILUS STEEL STEEL 83.40* 156M23 05/24/89 232.17 MARKETING FACTORS PRO SERVICES 156M23 05/24/89 232.17 MARKETING FACTORS PRO SERVICES 156M23 05/24/89 232.19 MARKETING FACTORS PRO SERVICES 696.53 * * * * ** 156M25 05/30/89 53.60 MED OXYGEN & EQUIP COMPRESSED AIR 06 -05 -89 PAGE 21 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4504 - 260 -26 151146 60- 1300 - 280 -04 151578 60- 1300 - 280 -04 151272 * ** -CKS 10- 4233 - 160 -16 10- 4233 - 200 -20 10- 4233 - 420 -42 40- 4233 - 800 -80 50- 4233 - 820 -82 50- 4233 - 840 -84 50- 4233 - 860 -86 * ** -CKS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 83626 1590 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 560 -56 46241 1291 10- 4540 - 560 -56 94343 1177 10- 4540- 560 -56 94656 1464 10- 4540 - 560 -56 76751 1758 * ** -CKS 10- 4608- 281 -28 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 510 -51 146373 * ** -CKS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 80464 1282 27- 4504 - 664 -66 84935 1656 50- 4201 - 820 -82 50- 4201 - 840 -84 50- 4201 - 860 -86 * ** -CKS 10- 4274 - 440 -44 1324 1989 CITY OF EDINA 220,257.78 METRO WASTE CONTROL SEWER CHARGE CHECK REGISTER 06 -05 -89 PAGE 22 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT -NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 156M25 05/30/89 48.09 05/24/89 MED OXYGEN & EQUIP OXYGEN 10- 4510 - 440 -44 COR. 1324 10- 4524 - 301 -30 156M42 05/25/89. 101.69 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 301 -30 156M42 05/19/89 179.24 * * * * ** ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 301 -30 1135 156M42 05/25/89 5,274.17 MIDWEST ASPHALT * ** -CKS 156M27 05/17/89 420.00 05/25/89 MERIT SUPPLY STERILANT 10- 4504 - 301 -30 21531 1390 156M27 05/17/89 399.95 MERIT SUPPLY SUPPLYS 10- 4504 - 325 -30 21561 1439 156M27 05/30/89 63.84 MERIT SUPPLY SOAP DISPENSESR 10- 4504 - 440 -44 21659 1331 156M27 05/30/89 63.84 MERIT SUPPLY SOAP DISPENSESR 10- 4504 - 440 -44 21585 1331 156M27 05/24/89 463.80 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLYS 10- 4512 - 540 -54 21606 1521 156M27 05/24/89 444.91 MERIT SUPPLY S -WALK REPAIR 10- 4518 - 365 -30 21530 1389 156M27 05/19/89 2,950,.00 MERIT SUPPLY PAINT 10- 4540 - 375 -30 21628 1510 156M27 05/19/89 2,00,0.00 MERIT SUPPLY PAINT 10- 4540 - 560 -56 21628 1510 156M27 05/17/89 256.90 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANERS 10- 4620- 560 -56 21533 1275 156M27 05/17/89 495.00 MERIT SUPPLY WASH /WAX 10- 4620 - 560 -56 21562 1438 156M27 05/30/89 4,514.00 MERIT SUPPLY EQUIP REPLAC 10- 4901 - 420 -42 21745 9526 156M27 05/30/89 194.25 MERIT SUPPLY MERI CLEAN II 26- 4512 - 682 -68 21774 1053 156M27 05/19/89 493.20 MERIT SUPPLY- SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 664 -66 21640 9569 156M27 05/24/89 263.40 MERIT SUPPLY SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 666 -66 21735 1701 156M27 05/24/89 1,965.00 MERIT SUPPLY REPAIR SCUBBER 28- 4248 - 702 -70 21725 1716 156M27 05/24/89 486.66 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 28- 4512- 702 -70 21714 1790 156M27 05/19/89 486.10 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 28- 4512- 702 -70 21675 1708 156M27 05/30/89 378.71 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 21757 1900 156M27 05/17/89 485.06 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 21665 1700 156M27 05/17/,89 392.00 MERIT SUPPLY BLOCKS 40- 4540- 801 -80 21518 1310 156M27 05/24/89 480.00 MERIT SUPPLY MEMBRANES 40- 4540 - 801 -80 21605 1522 156M27 05/24/89 86.40 MERIT SUPPLY FLOOR MAINT 50- 4236 - 821 -82 21711 1728 156M27 05/24/89 86.40 MERIT SUPPLY FLOOR MAINT 50- 4236 - 841 -84 21711 17,869.42 * * * * ** * ;* -CKS 15BM29 05/30/89 174.46 MESSERLI & KRAMER AMBULANCE COLLECT 10- 3180 - 000 -00 156M29 05/30/89 227.70 MESSERLI & KRAMER AMBULANCE COLLECT 10- 3180 - 000 -00 402.16 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156M31 05/30/89 28.90 METRO FONE COMM. EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 307577 156M31 05/24/89 30.00 METRO FONE COMM. PAGER RENTAL 10- 4504 - 184 -18 306859 156M31 05/17/89 54.80 METRO FONE COMM. PAGER RENTAL 40- 4504 - 801 -80 301349 113.70 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156M35 05/17/89 220,257.78 METRO WASTE CONTROL SEWER CHARGE 40- 4312 - 812 -80 6734 220,257.,78 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156M42 05/24/89 109.67 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 301 -30 156M42 05/25/89. 125.43 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 301 -30 156M42 05/19/89 179.24 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 301 -30 1135 156M42 05/25/89 5,274.17 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 314 -30 156M42 05/25/89 15.44 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524- 647 -64 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 156M42 05/25/89 156M42 05/24/89 156M42 05/19/89 * * * * ** 156M46 05/24/89 156M46 05/30/89 156M46 05/24/89 156M47 05/24/89 156M47 05/17/89 * * * * ** 156M58 05/19/89 156M59 05/17/89 156M60 05/19/89 156M68 05/30/89 156M68 05/30/89 * * * * ** 156M73 05/17/89 * * * * ** 156M76 05/24/89 156M76 05/24/89 156M76 05/17/89 * * * * ** 156M80 05/24/89 156M80 05/30/89 156M80 05/17/89 156M81 05/17/89 156M81 05/30/89 156M81 05/24/89 AMOUNT 642.13 286.50 190.87 6,823.45 * 220.58 201.19 108.89 530.66 * 30.00 21.90 51.90 * 502.45 502.45 * 122.50 122.50 * 54.15 54.15 160.66 218.30 378.96 48.97 48.97 32.68 42.69 124.23 199.60 * 32.00 31.77 177.77 241.54 * 39.92 58.54 184.23 CHECK R-!.._STER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP METZ BAKING CO METZ BAKING CO METZ BAKING CO MIDWAY IND SUPPLY MIDWAY IND SUPPLY MILLIPORE MILSCO ENGINEERING MILWAUKEE TOOL CO. MN. CELLULAR TEL MN. CELLULAR TEL MN. ELEVATOR MN. GLOVE MN. GLOVE MN. GLOVE MN SUBURBAN NEWS MN SUBURBAN NEWS MN SUBURBAN NEWS MN. TORO INC. MN. TORO INC. MN. TORO INC. BREAD BREAD BREAD /ROLLS PAINT REPAIR KIT PARTS LAB SUPPLIES WADING POOL SPRAYER PARTS /LABOR CAR PHONE EQUIP RENTAL CONTRACT SERV GLOVES GLOVES SAFETY GLASSES LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION LEGAL PUBLICATION SPRINKLER PARTS SPRINKLER PARTS PARTS 06 -05 -89 PAGE 23 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 40- 4524 - 803 -80 40- 4524 - 803 -80 40- 4524 - 803 -80 27- 4624 - 663 -66 27- 4624 - 663 -66 27 -4624- 663 -66 10- 4540 - 560 -56 94570 1455 10- 4540 - 560 -56 94379 1455 10- 4504 - 482 -48 43076 1493 26- 4504 - 682 -68 050389 1193 10- 4248 - 560 -56 258215 1657 10- 4204 - 140 -14 10- 4226 - 420 -42 30- 4288 - 782 -78 307304 1714 10- 4504 - 325 -30 31158 1442 10- 4504 - 325 -30 31090 1595 40- 4504- 803 -80 30776 1442 10- 4210 - 140 -14 10- 4210 - 140 -14 10- 4210 - 140 -14 10- 4504 - 642 -64 50640 1535 10- 4504 - 643 -64 753395 1393 10- 4540 - 560 -56 750330 1513 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGIS -iER 06 -05 -89 PAGE 24 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 156M81 05/24/89 7.89 MN. TORO INC. PARTS 10- 4540-560 -56 750372 1516 156M81 05/17/89 .91 MN. TORO INC. PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 747329 1118 156M81 05/17/89 14.28 MN. TORO INC. STARTER 10- 4540 - 560 -56 747400 1118 156M81 05/24/89 34.61 MN. TORO INC. PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 752063 1118 156M81 05/24/89 182.83 MN. TORO INC. IRR PARTS 27 -4540- 664 -66 752342 1623 156M81 05/24/89 155.98 MN. TORO INC. IRRIGATION PARTS 27- 4540 - .664 -66 752359 1573 156M81 05/24/89 44.46 MN. TORO INC. IRR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 753655 1761 156M81 05/24/89 175.07 MN. TORO INC. IRRIGATION PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 752339 1573 898.72 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156M85 05/30/89 23.55 MN. WANNER BALLFIELDS 10- 4504 - 642 -64 72266 1936 156M85 05/30/89 15.70 MN. WANNER BALLFIELDS 10- 4504 - 642 -64 072159 156M85 05/30/89 5.10 MN. WANNER WEED SPRAYER 10- 4504 - 643 -64 72215 1934 156M85 05/30/89 15.95 MN. WANNER WATERING TREES 10- 4504 - 644 -64 72153 1937 156M85 05/17/89 30.00 MN. WANNER HOSE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 072011 72011 156M85 05/30/89 105.00 MN. WANNER NOZZLE FOR POOL 26- 4248 - 682 -68 72226 1938 195.30 * * * * ** *x* -CKS 156M93 05/30/89 158.80 MOTOROLA RADIO SERV 10- 4248 - 440 -44 1329 158.80 * -, * ** -CKS 156M97 05/30/89 5,281.86 MPLS FINANCE.DEPT. WATER PURCHASED 40- 4640 - 803 -80 5,281.86 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156NO3 05/17/89 570.00 MPLS SEWER & WATER SERV LINE REPAIR 40- 4248 - 801 -80 20805 1546 570.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156N13 05/24/89 43.45 MUZAK ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 822 -82 156N13 05/24/89 43.45 MUZAK ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 862 -86 86.90 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156N16 05/17/89 26.92 N.S.P. COMPANY POWER 40- 4252 - 801 -80 26.92 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156N18 05/25/89 62.50 NATL CAMERA EXCH. EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274 - 420 -42 306 62.50 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156N21 05/24/89 102.67 NAPA AUTO PARTS CLUTCH 10- 4540 - 560 -56 510476 1612 156N21 05/24/89 58.40 NAPA AUTO PARTS WIRE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 510577 1620 1989 CITY OF EDINA 51.60 CHECK F.:: STER 10- 4580 - 301 -30 06 -05 -89 PAGE 25 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 44.59 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 156N21 05/24/89 111.98 96.19 NAPA AUTO PARTS HELICOIL 10- 4540 - 560 -56 510719 1653 156N21 05/24/89 49.90 30- 4216 - 781 -78 NAPA AUTO PARTS PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 509964 1607 156N21 05/17/89 7.88 1,297.41 NAPA AUTO PARTS TRANS KIT 10- 4540- 560 -56 507371 1463 156N21 05/24/89 220.00 700.63 NAPA AUTO PARTS BRAKE FLUID 10- 4620 - 560 -56 512833 1738 156N21 05/24/89 134.87 1,998.04 NAPA AUTO PARTS BATTERY PARTS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 508626 1527 4,000.00 * * * * ** 685.70 156P28 * * * * ** 156017 05/17/89 117.50 EQUIP OFFICE PRODUCTS DISK DRIVE INSTAL 10- 4233 - 560 -56 * ** -CKS 156N33 05/25/89 92.00 511.87 NELSON RADIO COMM EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274 - 420 -42 15202 156N33 05/25/89 176.00 511.87- NELSON RADIO COMM EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274 - 420 -42 15203 156017 268.00 * OFFICE PRODUCTS CREDIT 10- 4288 - 510 -51 * * * * ** * *. -CKS 156N48 05/17/89 51.60 NO STAR TURF TOOL PARTS 10- 4580 - 301 -30 11966 1365 156N48 05/17/89 44.59 100.00 NO STAR TURF MOWER PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 115600 1625 AUDIT 29- 4216 - 721 -72 96.19 * 700.00 PEAT MARWICK MAIN * * * * ** AUDIT 30- 4216 - 781 -78 156P27 05/17/89 1,000.00 PEAT * ** -CKS 156N72 05/24/89 1,297.41 40- 4216 - 800 -80 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES 10- 4616- 560 -56 PEAT 156N72 05/17/89 700.63 AUDIT NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES 10- 4616 - 560 -56 600.00 PEAT MARWICK 1,998.04 * AUDIT 66- 4216 - 000 -00 4,000.00 * * * * ** 156P28 * ** -CKS 156017 05/17/89 117.50 EQUIP OFFICE PRODUCTS DISK DRIVE INSTAL 10- 4233 - 560 -56 080152 156017 05/17/89 511.87 OFFICE PRODUCTS CREDIT 10- 4288 - 510 -51 156017 05/17/89 511.87- OFFICE PRODUCTS CREDIT 10- 4288 - 510 -51 156017 05/17/89 511.87- OFFICE PRODUCTS CREDIT 10- 4288 - 510 -51 156017 05/24/89 575.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS SERVICE CONTRACT 10- 4288 - 510 -51 080724 1847 156017 05/17/89 22.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPUTER CABLE 10- 4504 - 420 -42 079907 156017 05/17/89 42.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 510 -51 080595.1629 156017 05/17/89 3,920.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPUTER EQUIP 28- 1300 - 001 -00 080048 9741 4,164.63 * * * * ** *,* -CKS 156036 05/24/89 34.70 OLSON CHAIN & CABLE CHAIN LINK 10- 4504 - 646 -64 88208 1618 34.70 * 156037 05/17/89 540.00 BILL OLSON DIRT FOR PARKS 10- 4562 - 643 -64 540.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156P27 05/17/89 900.00 PEAT MARWICK MAIN CO AUDIT 28- 4216 - 701 -70 156P27 05/17/89 100.00 PEAT MARWICK MAIN CO AUDIT 29- 4216 - 721 -72 156P27 05/17/89 700.00 PEAT MARWICK MAIN CO AUDIT 30- 4216 - 781 -78 156P27 05/17/89 1,000.00 PEAT MARWICK MAIN CO AUDIT 40- 4216 - 800 -80 156P27 05/17/89 700.00 PEAT MARWICK MAIN CO AUDIT 41- 4216 - 900 -90 156P27 05/17/89 600.00 PEAT MARWICK MAIN CO AUDIT 66- 4216 - 000 -00 4,000.00 * 156P28 05/17/89 279.62 PLANT EQUIP INC BUTTERFLY VALVE 40- 4540 - 801 -80 11517 1440 AMOUNT 279.62 * 860.00 860.00 * 147.00 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 375.90 * 156P31 05/30/89 k * * k k k 156P44 05/30/89 156P44 05/30/89 156P44 05/30/89 18.50 ' *• -CKS 156P48 05/24/89 156P48 05/24/89 156P48 05/30/89 145.00 156P64 05/25/89 156P64 05/30/89 * *k *k* * 156Q09 05/24/89 156Q09 05/30/89 * * * * ** PLBG 156Q22 05/24/89 * * * * ** 156R01 05/19/89 * * * * ** 156R22 05/17/89 * * * * ** * 156R35 05/24/89 156R35 05/19/89 156R35 * * * * ** 05/19/89 AMOUNT 279.62 * 860.00 860.00 * 147.00 114.45 114.45 * ** -CKS 375.90 * 94.50 10408 20.00 112.00 226.50 * 18.50 ' *• -CKS 108.65 GLOVES 127.15 * 63.50 145.00 208.50 * 125.10 * ** -CKS 125.10 * 252.80 3613 252.80 * 105.00 PLBG 105.00 * 35.25 86.00 PLBG 25.85 3492 147.10 * CF;cCK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION PETER COTTON PHYSIO CONTROL PHYSIO CONTROL PHYSIO CONTROL PIP PRINTING PIP PRINTING PIP PRINTING POMMER CO. INC POMMER CO. INC QUALITY REFRIG QUALITY REFRIG QUIK PRINT R & R SPECIALTIES REM SUPPLIES RICHFIELD PLUMB CO RICHFIELD PLUMB CO RICHFIELD PLUMB CO CONT ED LIFEPAK FIRST AID SUPPLIES LIFEPAK CASE PRINTING PRINTING PRINTING PLAQUE AWARDS REPAIR ICE MAKER MAINT NEWSLETTER 06 -05 -89 PAGE 26 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 4202 - 440 -44 * ** -CKS 10- 4248 - 440 -44 E33612 9909 10- 4510 - 440 -44 E33612 9909 10- 4510 - 440 -44 E33606 9909 * ** -CKS 30- 4600 - 781 -78 4811 1881 30- 4600 - 781 -78 4813 1883 30- 4600 - 781 -78 4854 1966 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 100 -10 018146 10- 4504 - 100 -10 018145 1967 * ** -CKS 27- 4288 - 663-66 063515 27- 4288 - 663 -66 104195 * ** -CKS 27- 4600 - 661 -66 16567 1858 * ** -CKS REPAIR TIRES 28- 4248 - 704 -70 10408 1580 ' *• -CKS SAFETY GLOVES 10- 4642 - 301 -30 42589 1397 * ** -CKS FAUCET PARTS 27- 4248 - 663 -66 3613 1233 REPAIR PLBG 28- 4248 - 702 -70 3452 9996 REPAIR PLBG 28- 4248 - 702 -70 3492 1060 * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK RF -ER 06 -05 -89 PAGE 27 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 156R43 05/24/89 217.70 RITEWAY CALIPER BRAKE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 176000 1596 217.70 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156R47 05/19 ^- 986-00 - RGAD- MA6- H- 1- NE-R -Y o2 ^8- ,3--886--88 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156R49 156R49 05/30/89 05/30/89 199.00 106.59 ROAD RESCUE ROAD LITES FOR TOWER 10- 4504 - 440 -44 050036 9914 305.59 RESCUE AMBULANCCE SUPPLIES 10- 4540 - 440 -44 050073 1860 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156R53 05/30/89 43.20 ROBERT B.. HILL SALT 10- 4504 - 440 -44 03394 1320 43.20 * * * * ** — -CKS 156R63 05/30/89 3,070.00 ROGERS PAINTING PAINTING 10- 4201 - 647 -64 9921 3,070.00 * * * * ** * *, -CKS 156R69 05/30/89 400.05 ROSLAND MEETING EXP 10- 4206 - 140 -14 400.05 * * * * ** - ** -CKS 156R71 05/30/89 238.00 RUNYAN /VOGEL GROUP CONSTRUCTION 27- 1300 - 001 -00 238.00 * * * * ** * "* -CKS 156R79 156R79 05/24/89 05/24/89 225.00 507.93 RTW INC. RTW FEE FOR SERVICE 10- 4260 - 510 -51 INC. FEE FOR SERVICES 10- 4260 - 510 -51 732.93 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156R81 05/17/89 366.15 RUBENSTEIN & ZIFF CRAFT SUPPLIES 23- 4588 - 611 -61 1486 366.15 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156503 05/30/89 9.80 S.T. ROBB HARDWARE 10- 4540 - 646 -64 49998 1662 9.80 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156509 05/17/89 111.33 SCHAFER EQUIP CO TOOLS 10- 4580 - 301 -30 145154 1517 111.33 * _f CHECK REGIS. _:R VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 1989 CITY OF EDINA SUBURBAN TIRE & AUTO TIRES CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT TOOLS 156S10 05/17/89 488.60 REPAIRS 156S10 05/17/89 486.80 REPAIR PARTS SHERWIN WILLIAMS ADHESIVE 975.40 PAINT * * * * ** SOFTWARE /ARENA SOUTHDALE FORD CABLE 156S15 05/24/89 61.07 VALVE 156515 05/30/89 111.57 PARTS 156515 05/17/89 78.87 FLOOR MIANT 251.51 * * * * ** 156519 05/17/89 241.02 156S19 05/17/89 245.63 156519 05/17/89 8.46 495.11 * * * * ** 156S27 05/24/89 32.94 156S27 05/19/89 487.44 520.38 * * * * * ** 156S32 05/24/89 106.96 106.96 * * * * * ** 156534 05/17/89 86.79 156S34 05/17/89 289.28 156534 05/17/89 32.44 156S34 05/17/89 4.63 156534 05/17/89 29.12 442.26 * 156S35 05/.24/89 40.95 156S35 05/24/89 26.95 67.90 * * * * * ** 156551 05/30/89 95.95 95.95 * * * * * ** 156S54 05/17/89 139.70 139.70 * * * * * ** 156S67 05/24/89 3,125.00 _f CHECK REGIS. _:R VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION SUBURBAN TIRE & AUTO TIRES SUBURBAN TIRE & AUTO TIRES SEARS TOOLS SEARS TOOLS SEARS MISC TOOLS SEELYE PLASTICS REPAIRS SEELYE PLASTICS REPAIRS SEELYE PLASTICS REPAIR PARTS SHERWIN WILLIAMS ADHESIVE SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT SOFTWARE FIRST SOFTWARE /ARENA SOUTHDALE FORD CABLE SOUTHDALE FORD AIRCHAMBER SOUTHDALE FORD VALVE SOUTHDALE FORD PARTS SOUTHDALE FORD PARTS SOUTHERN VACUUM VACUUM REPAIR SOUTHERN VACUUM FLOOR MIANT ST PAUL CANDY /TABAC CIGARS STAR TRIBUNE WANT ADS STORE FRONT HUMAN SERVICE 05 -05 -89 PAGE 28 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4616 - 560 -56 54498 1452 10- 4616 - 560 -56 54348 1373 CKS 10- 4504 - 325 -30 1383 10- 4580- 646 -64 8967 10- 4580 - 646 -64 1434 * -CKS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 139687 1370 40- 4540 - 801 -80 139671 1304 40- 4540 - 801 -80 - -CKS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 47494 1547 28- 4544 - 702 -70 47841 1568 . "^ -CKS 28- 1300 - 001 -00 22821 1846 *** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 205922 10- 4540 - 560 -56 206564 10-4540- 560 -56 206818 10- 4540 - 560 -56 206657 10- 4540- 560 -56 206910 50- 4236 - 841 -84 50- 4236 - 861 -86 * ** -CKS 27- 4624- 663 -66 6653 8922 * ** -CKS 10- 4212 - 510 -51 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 504 -50 112306 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE * * * * ** 27- 4504 - 662 -66 156572 05/25/89 156572 05/25/89 156572 05/24/89 * * * * ** 27- 4624 - 663 -66 156577 05/17/89 156577 05/17/89 156577 05/19/89 156577 05/17/89 156577 05/17/89 156577 05/17/89 156577 05/17/89 156577 05/17/89 156578 05/30/89 156578 05/30/89 156578 05/24/89 156578 05/17/89 156578 05/24/89 156578 05/17/89 * * * * ** 156592 05/25/89 * * * * ** SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP 156T08 05/30/89 156T08 05/30/89 * * * * ** SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP 156T10 05/30/89 156T10 05/30/89 156T10 05/30/89 156T11 05/24/89 156T11 05/17/89 * * * * ** 156T13 05/19/89 156T13 05/24/89 CHECK RE TER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 3,125.00 27- 4504 - 662 -66 844.94 2023 STREICHERS 1,530.75 12463 STREICHERS 402.00 27- 4624 - 663 -66 STREICHERS 2,777.69 GRASS SEED 10- 4540 - 520 -52 126.23 1512 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 367.66 18312 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 927.95 10- 4201 - 644 -64 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 82.66 SERVICES SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 100.00 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 10.11 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 61.15 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET .60 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 1,676.36 184.50 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP 344.67 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP 185.85 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP 212.21 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP 176.42 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP 161.87 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP 1,265.52 75.58 SYSTEM SUPPLY 75.58 * 317.23 TARGET 8.78 TARGET 326.01 * 246.05 TERRY ANN SALES CO. 495.20 TERRY ANN SALES CO. 478.30 TERRY ANN SALES CO. 1,219.55 * 325.00 TESSMAN SEED & CHEM 120.90 TESSMAN SEED & CHEM 445.90 * 810.00 TOM HORWATH 570.00 TOM HORWATH UNIFORMS UNIFORMS SPEAKER REPAIR WORK BODY WORK BODY WORK WASHER /WIPER TRANS REPAIR LUBE NOZZLE RETAINER POOL PARTS POOL PARTS PUMP HOUSE REPAIR SDALE PUMPHOUSE PAMELA PUMP HOUSE PUMPHOUSE REPAIRS PAPER SUPPLIES CABLE TV PHOTO SUPPLIES FA 06 -05 -89 PAGE 29 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 4266 - 420 -42 M60787 1067 10- 4266 - 420 -42 M60876 1067 10- 4540 - 560 -56 60289 1545 10- 4248 - 560 -56 81580 10- 4248 - 560 -56 5519 10- 4248 - 560 -56 5521 1382 10- 4540 - 560 -56 107133 10- 4540 - 560 -56 81913 10- 4540 - 560 -56 °106815 10- 4540 - 560 -56 106948 10- 4540 - 560 -56 107121 10- 4540 - 646 -64 1722 10- 4540- 646 -64 1729 40- 4540 - 801 -80 1584 40- 4540 - 801 -80 1309 40- 4540- 801 -80 1465 40- 4540 - 803 -80 1391 10- 4504- 510 -51 050753 1947 10- 2148 - 000 -00 10- 4508 - 120 -12 PLATES /LINERS 27- 4504 - 662 -66 12447 2023 CUPS PAPER 27- 4504 - 664 -66 12463 1956 NAPKINS /CLOTH 27- 4624 - 663 -66 12451 2025 GRASS SEED 10- 4540 - 520 -52 20337 1512 CHEMICALS 30- 4564- 783 -78 18312 1401 FORESTRY 10- 4201 - 644 -64 SERVICES 10- 4201 - 644 -64 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA- CHECK REGISTER 06 -05 -89 PAGE 30 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 156T13 05/19/89 810.00 TOM HORWATH FORESTRY 10- 4201 - 664 -64 156T13 05/19/89 810.00- TOM HORWATH FORESTRY 10- 4201 - 664 -64 1,380.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156T29 05/17/89 14,555.00 THOMSEN - NYBECK LEGAL 10- 4201 - 220 -22 156T29 05/17/89 300.92 THOMSEN - NYBECK LEGAL 10- 4201 - 220 -22 14,855.92 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156T38 05/19/89 1,535.00 TOIVONEN PAINTING PAINTING 10- 4248 - 646 -64 1341 156T38 05/19/89 1,480.00 TOIVONEN PAINTING PAINTING 60- 1300 - 014 -20 1342 3,015.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156T40 05/24/89 79.26 TOLL COMPANY WELDING GAS 10- 4504 - 646 -64 38561 1601 156T40 05/17/89 27.08 TOLL COMPANY WELD SUPPLYS 10- 4504 - 801 -80 038284 1528 156T40 05/24/89 69.30 TOLL COMPANY SUPPLIES 10- 4610 - 560 -56 457595 1744 156T40 05/24/89 16.74 TOLL COMPANY ACETYLENE 27- 4580 - 664 -66 38801 1763 192.38 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156T46 05/24/89 103.58 TOTAL TOOL TOOLS 10- 4580 - 301 -30 103658 1515 103.58 * * * * ** *x* -CKS 156T53 05/24/89 6,960.18 TRACY OIL GASOLINE 10- 4612 - 560 -56 T10045 1814 6,960.18 * ** -CKS 156T64 05/24/89 351.,00 TRI STATE PUMP POOL PUMP REBUILD 25- 4900 - 002 -68 93555 351.00 * * * * ** *ft*-CKS 156U08 05/17/89 584.70 UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 30- 4262 - 782 -78 14619 156U08 05/30/89 27.95 UNIFORM UNLIMITED LAUNDRY /UNIFORM 30- 4262 - 782 -78 15112 2021 156U08 05/17/89 41.95- UNIFORM UNLIMITED CREDIT 30- 4262 - 782 -78 570.70 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156U14 05/19/89 89.53 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP WIRE /CONDUIT 10- 4540 - 540 -54 186420 1659 156U14 05/17/89 77.83 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP ELECTR PARTS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 1518 156U14 05/19/89 550.00 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP GROUND CLAMPS 40- 4504 - 806 -80 1297 156U14 05/19/89 81.78 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP FREIGHT CHARGE 40- 4540 - 801 -80 090609 9733 799.14 * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK RE STER 06 -05 -89 PAGE 31 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 156U25 05/30/89 12.50 UNIVERSAL MED SERV AIR ADAPTOR 10- 4504 - 440 -44 001771 12.50 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156V15 05/19/89 417.45 VAN PAPER CO. LUNCH RM SUPPLYS 10- 4514 - 520 -52 257281 1713 417.45 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156V30 05/24/89 196.10 VANTAGE ELECTRIC REPAIRS 27- 4248 - 662 -66 10661 1855 196.10 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156V46 05/17/89 17.08 VESSCO PARTS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 6027 1430 17.08 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156V57 05/24/89 9.83 VIKING INDUS CTR SIGNS 27- 4248 - 662 -66 367949 1553 9.83 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156V78 05/19/89 372.00 VL SERVICE LIGHTING LAMPS 10- 4504 - 330 -30 72044 1591 372.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156V80 05/17/89 100.92 VOSS ELECTRIC SUP PARTS 10- 4504 - 540 -54 250301 1537 156V80 05/19/89 260.88 VOSS ELECTRIC SUP LAMPS 10- 4540 - 390 -30 250590 1658 361.80 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156W08 05/17/89 186.13 W.W. GRAINGER ELECTRIC MOTOR 10- 4540 - 540 -54 1307 186.13 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156W11 05/24/89 446.56 W. GORDON SMITH GAS 27- 4612 - 664 -66 1900 1827 446.56 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156W13 05/24/89 365.00 WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP CHECK VALVE 40- 4540 - 801 -80 98768 1906 365.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 156W25 05/17/89 426.76 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE 10- 4250 - 301 -30 156W25 05/17/89 83.14 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE 10- 4250 - 440 -44 156W25 05/17/89 91.30 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE 10- 4250 - 520 -52 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 156W25 05/17/89 426.76 156W25 05/17/89 15.95 156W25 05/17/89 27.71 156W25 05/17/89 380.58 156W25 05/17/89 76.75 156W25 05/17/89 166.40 156W25 05/17/89 166.40 156W25 05/17/89 294.40 156W25 05/17/89 294.40 FUND 41 2,450.55 * * * * * ** 50 TOTAL 156W35 05/30/89 165.84 165.84 * * * * * ** 156W44 05/24/89 54.52 54.52 * * * * * ** 156W49 05/24/89, 274.00 274.00 * * * * * ** 156W63 05/17/89 325.00 156W63 05/17/89 499.00 824.00 * * * * ** 156W76 05/30/89 375.00 156W76 05/30/89 185.14 560.14 * * * * ** 156Z05 05/30/89 200.25 200.25 * * * * ** 145,133.28 149,119.28 " 7659.48 4,382.88 2,529.96 64,540.84 11,047.86 301.42 5,545.23 5,556.2=- 253,840.22 2,067.00 5,082.36 Syr- �� LJ CHECK REGI., HR VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE WASTE MGMT - SAVAGE GARBAGE WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE WEIGLE -SUE MILEAGE WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. GAS HOSE WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT HOIST REPAIR WM BAIRD CO PRINTING WM BAIRD CO PRINT WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY STAND WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY CLUBS ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE FUND 10 TOTAL FUND 23 TOTAL FUND 25 TOTAL FUND 26 TOTAL FUND 27 TOTAL FUND 28 TOTAL FUND 29 TOTAL FUND 30 TOTAL FUND 40 TOTAL FUND 41 TOTAL FUND 50 TOTAL FIRST AID SUPPLIES GENERAL FUND ART CENTER CAPITAL FUND SWIMMING POOL FUND GOLF COURSE FUND RECREATION CENTER FUND GUN RANGE FUND EDINBOROUGH PARK UTILITY FUND STORM SEWER UTILITY LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 06 -05 -89 PAGE 32 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4250 - 540 -54 10- 4250 - 645 -64 23- 4250 - 612 -61 27- 4250 - 662 -66 27- 4250 - 664 -66 2.8- 4250 - 702 -70 30- 4250 - 782 -78 50- 4250 - 841 -84 50- 4250 - 861 -86 10- 4208 - 600 -60 10- 4610 - 560 -56 77905 9795 10- 4540 - 540 -54 18763 1289 23- 4600 - 611 -61 138 1267 23- 4600 - 611 -61 139 1267 27- 4504 - 666 -66 874941 -1482 27- 4504 - 666 -66 83822 9937 26- 4504 - 682 -68 540166 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS ' v i 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK R- :;TER 06 -05 -89 PAGE 33 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 16,741.70 FUND 60 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 600.00 FUND 66 TOTAL IMP BOND REDEMPTION #2 519,472.23* 523,468.04- TOTAL v LJJ 1989 OF EDINA V rwFrw Nn nATF AMMINT Lea �Yr ' %w ' , 2 IMN 1tw12 V 2 E 2 y� 3 %V 13 31 3: 31 35 4( 4 4: 4: %014, 41 4- tw 31 '�I 3 b I' CHECK STER 04 -30 -5 AGE 1 vokin AD TTCM nCQPOTOTTAU A,`,'Al1Y1T MA T►IU L o A Y ueeewre 093712 04/18/89 10.00 SHHSC MEETING 10 -4206- 140-14 MANUAL --1.0-00 * — 093713 04/18/89 8,000.00 ZAHNER CONSTR REHAB 10 -1132- 000 -00 MANUAL 8,000.00 * •rrrrr * ** -CKS 093P32 04/18/89 23,901.67 P.E.R.A. PERA 10- 4145 - 510 -51 MANUAL 23,901.67 * � srrrrr * ** -CKS 093P70 04/18/89 914.58 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 10- 4290 - 510 -51 MANUAL ' 914.58 rr *rrr *:a. *-CKS 1 094714 04/18/89 280.00 CRAGUNS CONF CONFERENCE 10 -4202- 140 -14 MANUAL 280.00 rrrrrr 094E33 04/18/89 13.00 EDINA CHAMBER MEETING 10- 4206 - 140 -14 MANUAL 13.00 * rrrrrr - -CKS 095712 04/18/89 10.00 SHHSC MEETING EXP 10 -4206- 100 -10 MANUAL 10.00 * rrrrrr *.t::Y -CKS 095730 04/18/89 357.50 PAULGANDRUD WAGES /PRO SHOP 27 -4120- 661 -66 MANUAL 095730 04/18/89 38.50 PAUL GANDRUD WAGES /DOME 27- 4120- 667 -66 MANUAL 396.00 * 095731 04/18/89 55.00 T.C.P.M.A. SEMINAR 10- 4202 - 160-16 MANUAL 55.00 * rrrrrr * ** -CKS 09SP70 04/18/89 8.75 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 10- 4290- SIO -51 MANUAL I' 8.75 1 •rrrrr GKS ' 1 096P70 04/18/89 194.68 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 10-4290-510-51 MANUAL 1 194.68 * ' 1 rrrrrr •.r. *_i:KS 097766 04/18/89 60.00 RAY PHILLIPS REIMBURSEMENT 40-4202- 800 -80 MANUAL 60.00 097767 04/18/89 128.00 BRUCE DEHN REIMBURSEMENT 40- 4202 - 800 -80 MANUAL 0 4 1989 CITY OF EDINA �m CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 2 2FNIE 4 i 9 „ '- , „ 4, 2f 2 2: (}s 2: 2. 2! e`. 21 V 2t r 2: 3( 3' 4► 33 3E 37 3E 3V 4C 041 42 43 0 44 45 4E f!• 47 4E 43 0 SC 51 52 0 53 54 SS 5E CHECK REGISTER 04 -30 -89 PAGE VFNAAR TTFM AFArPTPTTAN Arrm INT NA TNV A P A a MFRF:AGF t - .f r am Lm s, 12 71 72 73 74 77 7 • 128.00 • - - - -- - -- ... - -- 097768 - -- — - -- - 04/18/89 - - - --- -- -- - -- 68.00 -- - - - - -- -- -- - - -- MIKE BRAMWELL -- - -- - -- REIMBURSEMENT - 40- 4202 - 800 -80 MANUAL 68.00 • rrrrr• ** *-CKS - 09-7M9-- 0- 4L19L89 1,188,-00 MINNFBA$CO HEAT 10-4254- 440 -44 MANUAL 097M98 04/18/89 1,269.51 MINNEGASCO HEAT 10- 4254 - 520 -52 MANUAL 097M98 04/18/89 6,429.43 MINNEGASCO HEAT 10-4254 - 540 -54 MANUAL 097M98 04_/_18/89 1,829.01 MINNEGASCO HEAT 10- 4254 - 646 -64 MANUAL 097M98 04/18/89 219.27 MINNEGASCO HEAT 23-4254 - 612-61 MANUAL I 097M98 04/18/89 1,148.61 MINNEGASCO HEAT 27- 4254 - 662 -66 MANUAL 1 _091M90 04/1.818.2 -Z3 -9_-Q MINNEGASCO HEAT 27- 4254 - 664 -66 MANUAL 04/18/89 2,788.25 MINNEGASCO HEAT 27- 4254 - 667 -66 MANUAL L097M98 097M98 04/18/89 3,416.37 MINNEGASCO HEAT 28- 4254 - 702 -TO MANUAL 097M98 04/18/89 4,402.86 MINNEGASCO HEAT 30-4254- 782 -78 MANUAL 097M98 04/18/89 328.11 MINNEGASCO HEAT 40-4254- 801 -80 MANUAL 097M98 04/18/89 3,989.47 MINNEGASCO HEAT 40- 4254 - 803 -80 MANUAL _ _0477MM9$ 04/1-8/89 185.51 MINNEGASCO HEAT 50- 4254- 821 -82 MANUAL 097M98 04/18/89 298.89 MINNEGASCO HEAT 50- 4254- 841 -84 MANUAL 097M98 04/18/89 286.03 MINNEGASCO HEAT 50- 4254 - 861 -86 MANUAL 28,018.35 r *rrrrr * ** -CKS 100714 04/18/89 70.00 CRAGUNS CONF RESERVATION 10-4202- 140 -14 MANUAL 70.00 r rrrrrr * ** -CKS 100793 - - - -- 04/18/89 - - - - - -- 34.05 DARLENE SKARE - -- — SUPPLYS 10-4202- 140 -14 MANUAL 34.05 w - -- - - - - -- rrrrrr * *« -CKS 100873 04/18/89 45.00 PETTY CASH GC MEMBERSHIPS 27-3410- 000 -00 MANUAL _]- 0.0873 04/18/89 7.00 PETTY CASH GC SCHOOL 27- 4202 - 661 -66 MANUAL 100873 04/18/89 29.66 PETTY CASH GC POSTAGE 27- 4290-661-66 MANUAL 100873 04/18/89 50.00 PETTY CASH GC GENERAL SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 662 -66 MANUAL 10OB73 04/18/89 23.94 PETTY CASH GC GENERAL SUPPLYS 27-4504 - 664 -66 MANUAL 100873 04/18/89 162.27 PETTY CASH GC PRINTING 27-4600- 661 -66 MANUAL 100873 04/18/89 92.09 PETTY CASH GC CONCESSIONS 27 -4624- 663 -66 MANUAL _ 00 73 04/18/89 25.00 PETTY CASH GC BEER 27 -4630- 667 -66 MANUAL 434.96 w rrrrrr * * * -CKG 101807 05/04/89 1.18- BRW ENT 50-3710- 842 -84 MANUAL _ 01803 05/04/89 78.60 BRW ENT 50- 4628-842 -84 MANUAL 77.42 r rrrrrr **v-CKS 1-10 IA82 04/18/89 24.39 AT &T TELEPHONE 30-4256- 782 -78 MANUAL t - .f r am Lm s, 12 71 72 73 74 77 7 • �-, C r 1989 OF EDINA rurru un nere eMnuur vm , G 3 � 7 2 2 � 3 3 3 3' 3 3 _ 3' 3' 4 4 ' 4 4. 4 ' 4' 4 4'. s� s s, s: 5! s. 6 ZW CHECK STER 04 -30 -8: AGE 3 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. H MESSAGE 101A82 04/18/89 3.22 AT &T TELEPHONE 50- 4256 - 821 -82 MANUAL 04/1_8/89 _ .31 _ AT &T TELEPHONE SO- 4256- 841 -84 MANUAL 27.92 * 101A83 04/18/89 89.29 AT &T TELEPHONE 10 -4256- 510 -51 MANUAL 101A83 04/18/89 5.72 AT&T TELEPHONE 10-4256- 628 -62 MANUAL 101A83 04/18/89 58.63 AT&T TELEPHONE 23 -4256- 612 -61 MANUAL 153.64 *, 101A84 04/18/89 13.95 AT &T TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL 13.95 * �� *• 4, ** -CKS 101E11 05/04/89 10.48— EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL lolEll 05/04/89 9.48— EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 101Ell 05/04/89 7.66- EAGLE WINE 50-3710-862-86 MANUAL lolEll 05/04/89 524.02 EAGLE WINE 50-4628-822 -82 MANUAL 101Ell 05/04/89 474.18 EAGLE WINE 50-4628- 842 -84 MANUAL l0lE1.1 05/04/89 383.09 EAGLE WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 101Ell 05/08/89 16.65 EAGLE WINE MIX 50- 4632- 822 -82 MANUAL 101Ell 05/08/89 89.07 EAGLE WINE MIX 50- 4632- 842 -84 MANUAL 1,459.39 « ** * * ** * ** -CKS 101E26 05/04/89 1.46- ED PHILLIPS 50-3710- 322 -82 MANUAL 101E26 05/04/89 1.24- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 822-82 MANUAL 101E26 05/04/89 3.01- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710-842 -84 MANUAL 101E26 05/04/89 13.53- ED PHILLIPS 50-3710-842 -84 MANUAL 101E26 05/04/89 4.90- ED PHILLIPS 50-3710- 842 -54 MANUAL 101E26 05/04/89 .69- ED PHILLIPS 50-3T10- 842 -84 MANUAL 101E26 05/04/89 1.55- ED PHILLIPS 50-3710-842 -84 MANUAL 101E26 05/04/89 4.62- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -88 MANUAL 101E26 05/04/89 .22- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862-86 MANUAL 101E26 05/04/89 6.07- ED PHILLIPS 50-3T10-362-8b MANUAL 101E26 05/04/89 7.07- ED PHILLIPS 50-3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 101E26 05/04/89 1.92- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710-862-86 MANUAL IOIE26 05/04 /889 676.70 ED PHILLIPS 50-4626- 842 -84 MANUAL IOIE26 05/04/89 77.67 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 101E26 05/04/89 231.19 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 101E26 05/04/89 146.40 ED PHILLIPS 50-4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 101E26 05/04/89 124.94 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL _101E26 05/04/89 490.14 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 101E26 05/04/89 301.59 ED PHILLIPS SO- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL IOIE26 05/04/89 69.84 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 101E26 05/04/89 707.14 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL i IOIE26 05/04/89 22.22 ED PHILLIPS SO -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL IOIE26 05/04/89 192.60 ED PHILLIPS 50-4628- 862 -86 MANUAL IOIE26 05/04/89 607.29 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 101E26 05/04/89 87.45- ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 3,513.99 + 101G82 05/04/89 36.16- GRIGGS COOPER SO- 3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL op 4 M 5 e i v o e 4r , is • z: z< ze z, z; � 3( 3' Ji -W 13e 3E 3:1 3E 3: 4( !� 41 4: W. r 4. y 4• 4E 4- 4E ^ 15( 5: 5: 5. 5: 5E s; 1989 CITY OF EDINA rwrew un nATF AMrniNT CHECK REGISTER 04 -30 -89 PAGE 4 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 4 P.O. 4 MESSAGE 101G82 05/04/89 34.52- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL .— ,OLG82__ 05/_04/69 3.5184- — GRIfzG--COQPER 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 101682 05/04/89 25.12- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 101GS2 05/04/89 7.65- GRIGGS COOPER 50-3710 - 822 -82 MANVAL 10IG82 05/04/89 43.44- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710-842 -84 MANUAL 101682 05/04/89 4.59- GRIGGS COOPER 50-3710- 842-84 MANUAL 101G82 05/04/89 4.81- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL — _141G82— S5-4(L4 489 3.Q6- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 862 -86 _ MANUAL 101G82 05/04/89 84.91- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL IOIG82 05/04/89 15.29- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 101G82 05/04/89 12.03- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 05/04/89 382.35 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL Lt01G82 101G82 05/04/89 1,256.16 GRIGGS COOPER 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL ___101G82_ 95404189 24.Q�0 GRIGGS COOPER 50-4626 - 642 -84 ___MANUAL 101682 05/04/89 229.41 GRIGGS COOPER 50-4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 101682 05/04/89 2,171.86 GRIGGS COOPER 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL i01G82 05/04/89 192.87 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 101682 05/04/89 4,245.57 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 101682 05/04/89 764.70 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626-SOE -86 MANUAL _101682 05/04/89 601.50 GRIGGS COOPER 50 -4626- 862-_86 MANUAL 101G82 05/04/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 101G82 05/04/89 5.87- GRIGGS COOPER 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 101G82 05/04/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 101G82 05/04/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50-4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 101682 05/04/89 120.74- GRIGGS COOPER 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL _1.9_L68P 05/04/89 _ 6.27- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 9,327.87 w r•••saE +.r + -CKS tO1J62 05/04/89 5.54- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 1.Q1J62 05/04/89 25.93- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 101J62 _ 05/04/89 .85- JOHNSON WINE 50-3710 - 842 -84 _ MANUAL IOIJ62 05/04/89 7.15- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL IOIJ62 05/04/89 8.29- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 101,162 05/04/89 41.35- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 101J62 05/04/69 51.74- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL — L01J6.2 0$/614/89 12.18- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL IOIJ62 05/04/89 1.21- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 10IJ62 05/04/89 1,296.84 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 10IJ62 05/04/89 6.30 JOHNSON WINE 50-4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 101J62 05/04/89 1.75 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842-84 MANVAL 10IJ62 05/04/89 11.55 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL — J..0_L,LOZ 05/04/69 357.55 JOHNSON WINE 50-4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 10IJ62 05/04/89 2,067.70 JOHNSON WINE 50-4626-842 -84 MANUAL 10IJ62 05/04/89 2,586.99 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL IOIJ62 05/04/89 10.15 JOHNSON WINE 50-4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL IOIJ62 05/04/89 6.65 JOHNSON WINE 50-4628 - 822 -62 MANUAL 101J62 05/04/89 552.04 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 522 -82 MANUAL _- 1.01 ,162 Q5/9�/89 830.70 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANVAL IOIJ62 05/04/89 1.05 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4626- 842 -34 MANUAL 101J62 05/04/89 85.35 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL IOIJ62 05/04/89 12.25 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL IOIJ62 05/04/89 18.55 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 662 -86 MANUAL 101J62 05/04/89 1.40 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 662 -86 MA NUAL l a %w r 1989 OF EDINA rUCPU NA AATF r Vr 7 • mp • • ANAIINT CHECK UFNAAR STER 04 -30 -8. GE 5 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. k P.O. M MESSAGE f 2 101J62 05/04/89 120.71 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628-862 -86 MANUAL ' 101i6e 05/04/89 1 .57 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 4 5 9,031.86 + 6 +++ + ++ * ** —CKS 7 e 101N16 04/18/89 23.45 NSP POWER 10 -4252- 301 -30 MANUAL ° 10IN16 04/18/89 12,141.70 NSP POWER 10 -4252- 321 -30 MANUAL 10 10IN16 04/18/89 10,441.16 NSP POWER 10-4252- 322 -30 MANUAL 11 101N16 04/18/89 2,416.49 NSP POWER 10-4252- 330 -30 MANUAL 12 101N16 04/18/89 525.91 NSP POWER 10-4252- 345 -30 MANUAL 13 101N16 04/18/89 34.86 NSP POWER 10-4252- 358 -30 MANUAL 14 101N16 04/18/89 1,953.06 NSP POWER 10 -4252- 375-30 MANUAL 15 101N16 04/18/89 579.84 NSP POWER 10-4252- 440 -44 MANUAL 16 101N16 04/18/89 44.13 NSP POWER 10-4252- 460 -46 MANUAL f7 101N16 04/18/89 1,302.62 NSP POWER 10- 4252- 520 -52 MANUAL 18 101N16 04/18/89 2,048.10 NSP POWER 10-4252 - 540 -54 MANUAL 19 10IN16 04/18/89 3,058.37 NSP POWER 10- 4252- 646 -64 MANUAL 20 10IN16 04/18/89 1,233.93 NSP POWER 23- 4252 - 612 -61 MANUAL 21 101N16 04/18/89 64.23 NSP POWER 26- 4252-682 -68 MANUAL 22 101N16 04/18/89 23.45 NSP POWER 27- 4252- 662 -66 MANUAL 23 101N16 04/18/89 163.77 NSP POWER 27- 4252- 664 -66 MANUAL 24 101N16 04/18/89 763.34 NSP POWER 27- 4252 - 667 -66 MANUAL 25 101N16 04/18/89 7,249.02 NSP POWER 28- 4252 - 702 -70 MANUAL 28 10IN16 04/18/89 5,629.96 NSP POWER 30- 4252-782 -78 MANUAL 27 101N16 04/18/89 2,360.15 NSP POWER 40- 4252-801-80 MANUAL 20 101N16 04/18/89 13,933.65 NSP POWER 40- 4252 - 803 -80 MANUAL 29 101N16 04/18/89 438.66 NSP POWER 50- 4252 - 821 -82 MANUAL 30 10IN16 04/18/89 573.13 NSP POWER 50- 4252- 841 -84 MANUAL 31 IOIN16 04/18/69 327.96 NSP POWER 50- 4252 - 861 -86 MANUAL 32 33 67,331.14 + 34 35 * + + + +• *efi —CKS 36 101P82 05/04/89 7.76- PRIOR WINE 50-3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 37 tO1P82 05/04/89 12.02- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710-842 -84 MANUAL 38 101P82 05/04/89 1.45- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710-842-84 MANUAL 39 101P$2 05/04/89 9.25- PRIOR WINE 50-3710 - 662 -86 MANUAL °O 1O1P82 05/08/89 19.95 PRIOR WINE WINE 50- 4628- 822-82 MANUAL 41 101P82 05/04/89 368.14 PRIOR WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL a2 101P82 05/04/89 72.58 PRIOR WINE 50-4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 43 IOIP82 05/04/89 601.04 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 842-84 MANUAL °° IOIP82 05/04/89 462.53 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 862-86 MANUAL 45 101P82 05/08/89 45.03 .PRIOR WINE MIX 50- 4632- 842-84 MANUAL 46 1,538.79 • 47 48 rt + + ++ * ** -CKS 49 70 101016 05/04/89 25 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 71 101016 05/04/89 1.72- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 52 101016 05/04/89 8.60- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 53 101016 05/04/89 3.65- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 74 101016 05/04/89 .87- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 35 101016 05/04/89 2.09- QUALITY WINE SO-3710-842-84 MANUAL 56 57 101016 05/04/69 8.51- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL I I 1989 CITY OF EDINA PWCPW NA AATF AMAIINT IQ 4 e i v e 8 s n 121 40 c 2 2, • 2, X 2, y3 • 2, C 31 3 • e� 37 3e 37 • 3e 3V 4C • 4, 47 a2 4! 4e 47 4E 49 Pj 5[ 5, 57 5_ 54 S• 5e 57 CHECK REGISTER 04 -30 -89 PAGE 6 VFNAAR TTFM DFRCRTPTTAN ACCAIINT NA TNV N P A_ 0 MESSAGE 101016 05/04/89 39.20- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL IM-0t6 05/04tj 1.74- 0MALITY WI E 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 101016 05/04/89 4.04- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 101016 05/04/89 7.77- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 1 1016 05/04/89 6.02- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -66 MANUAL IOIQ16 05/04/89 430.15 QUALITY WINE 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 101Q16 05/04/89 1,960.32 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 0101 -6 05/04189 387.90 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 101016 05/04/89 364.15 QUALITY WINE SO- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 101016 05/04/89 24.95- QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 101016 05/04/89 172.50 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 101016 05/04/89 86.50 QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 101016 05/04/69 209.10 QUALITY WINE 50-4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 01016 05/f9L @9 849 25 QUALITY WINE 50-4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 101Q16 05/04/89 173.00 QUALITY WINE SO -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 101016 05/04/89 403.30 QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 101016 05/04/89 600.05 QUALITY WINE 50-4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 5,527.31 wwwwww + +� -CK$ 101T49 05/04/89 40.35 TOW DISTRIBUTING 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 101T49 05/04/89 11.29- TOW DISTRIBUTING 50-4628-822 -82 MANUAL 29.06 + wwwww* * ** -CKS 103706 04/18/69 296.25 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY SPRING BANQUET 10-4206- 500 -50 MANUAL 296.25 w wwwwww * ** -CKS 103U27 04/18/89 7.85 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 460 -46 MANUAL 103027 04/18/89 31556.85 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510-51 MANUAL 103U27 04/18/89 636.76 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 622 -62 MANUAL 103U27 04/18/89 120.17 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 10 -4256- 628 -62 MANUAL 103U27 04/18/89 40.86 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 646 -64 MANUAL 103 04/18/89 160.76 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 23- 4256- 612 -61 MANUAL 103U27 04/18/89 24.88 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 26- 4256- 682 -68 MANUAL 103U27 04/18/89 324.79 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 27- 4256- 662 -66 MANUAL 103U27 04/18/89 52.42 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 27- 4256- 664 -66 MANUAL 103U27 04/18/89 15.88 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 27- 4256 - 667 -66 MANUAL 103U27 04/18/89 15.88- US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 27- 4256 - 667 -66 MANUAL 03U27 04/18/89 155.88 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 27-4256 - 667 -66 MANUAL 103U27 04/18/89 528.66 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 28- 4256 - 702 -70 MANUAL 103U27 04/18/89 38.23 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 29- 4256 - 722 -72 MANUAL 103027 04/18/89 316.71 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 30- 4256 - 782 -78 MANUAL 103U27 04/18/89 104.37 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 40- 4256 - 801 -80 MANUAL 103U27 04/18/89 307.80 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 40 -4256- 803-80 MANUAL 04/18/89 149.74 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 50- 4256 - 821 -82 MANUAL 103U27 04/18/89 177.51 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 50 -4256- 841 -84 MANUAL 103U27 04/18/89 125.74 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 50 -4256- 861 -86 MANUAL 6,829.98 • wwwwww ** *-CKS to 7 �r r r r to 10 r r r r s 1989 OF EDINA ^Ucd%U ►IA AATC AMAIIWT CHECK STER 04 -30 -8. +GE 7 UFWAAR TTFM OFACRTPTTON ACCOUNT NO_ TNV_ N P.O. N MESSAGE 4 2 3_ _104C33 04/18/89 133,000.00- CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 50 -1010- 000 -00 MANUAL 4 104C33 04/18/89 133,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 50 -1010- 000-00 MANUAL 5 a .00 + 7 rrrrrr rrr-CKS e 9 104C51 04/18/_89 83.08 COMM OF REVENUE SALE TAX 10- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 10 104C51 04/18/89 261.18 COMM OF REVENUE SALE TAX 23- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 11 104CSI 04/18/89 5,289.75 COMM OF REVENUE SALE TAX 27- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 12 104C51 04/18/69 124.63 COMM OF REVENUE SALE TAX 28-3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 13 104C51 04/18/89 11.85 COMM OF REVENUE SALE TAX 29-3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 14 104C51 04/18/89 118.50 COMM OF REVENUE SALAES TAX 29- 3357 - 000-00 MANUAL 15 104C51 04/18/89 11.85- COMM OF REVENUE SALAES TAX 29-3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 18 104C51 04/18/69 748.94 COMM OF REVENUE SALE TAX 30 -3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 17 104C51 04/18/89 934.57 COMM OF REVENUE SALE TAX 40 -3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 1B 104C51 04/18/89 7,067.74 COMM OF REVENUE SALE TAX 50-3357- 001 -00 MANUAL f9 104C51 04/18/89 13,807.30 COMM OF REVENUE SALE TAX SO- 3357 - 002 -00 MANUAL 20 104C51 04/18/89 12,102.57 COMM OF REVENUE SALE TAX 50-3357- 003 -00 MANUAL 21 40,538.E6 r 22 23 + + + + ++ 2a **v-CKS 25 104F14 04/18/89 14,487.13 FIDELITY BANK FICA 10-4149 - 510 -51 MANUAL 28 104F14 04/18/89 334.71 FIDELITY BANK MEDICARE 10 -4162- 510 -51 MANUAL 27 14 821.84 + 28 29 rrrrrr 30 * ** -CKS 31 107P32 04/18/89 23,771.28 P.E.R.A. PERA 10-4 45- - ANUA 32 33 23,771.28 + 34 rrrrrr * ** -CKS 35 38 108739 05/08/89 10.00 SHHSC MEETING 10-4206- 140 -14 MANUAL 37 10.00 + 38 39 rrrrrr * ** -CKS 40 41 108ASE 05/08/89 37.58 AT &T TELEPHONE 27- 4256-662 -66 MANUAL 42 108A82 05/08/89 8.18 AT &T TELEPHONE 28 -4256- 702-70 MANUAL 43 45.76 + 44 4s rrrrrr * ** -CKS 48 47 108E11 05/04/89 6.75- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 48 108EII 05/04/89 26.08- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 49 108E11 05/04/89 5.57- EAGLE WINE 50-3710-862-86 MANUAL 50 108E11 05/04/89 17.08- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710-662-86 MANUAL 01 1 8E11 05/04/89 337.72 EAGLE WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 42 108E11 05/04/89 1,304.07 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 53 108E11 05/04/89 853.97 EAGLE WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 76 108E11 05/04/89 278.55 EAGLE WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 85 108EII 05/08/89 125.14 EAGLE WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 MANUAL 36 108E11 77 05/08/89 131.18 EAGLE WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 862 -86 MANUAL 4 L J� w d T a e • 1989 CITY OF EDINA PWVPU NA AATR AMAIINT CHECK REGISTER 04 -30 -89 PAGE 8 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. N MESSAGE 1 1 2 2,975.15 13 2 3 6 10SE26 05/04/89 5.49- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL e ' 108E26 05/04/89 3.51- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822-42 MANUAL 9 ° 108E26 05/04/89 4.17- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL " 9 _L08E26_ -._— __05%04/89 2.06- EQPWLLiPl_ 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL :01 108E26 05/04/89 6.70- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL " 108E26 05/04/89 16.80- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL " 1: 12 108E26 05/04/89 1.98- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710-842 -84 MANUAL ,1 131 I 102E26 05/04/89 .18- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 1' 14' 108E26 05/04/89 1.56- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL " ''' 108E2.6 �5%0.9.C89 y 3- ED PHILLIPS 50-3710- 842 -84 MANUAL '2 6 108E26 05/04/89 7.71- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 2 " 10SE26 05/04/89 16.26- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 2 2, ° 108E26 05/04/89 3.90- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710-862-86 MANUAL 9 106E26 05/04/89 3.06- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 862-86 MANUAL 21 20� 108E26 05/04/89 175.55 ED PHILLIPS 50-4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 2' 2 2' 1.015E26 05/04/89 840.02 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626-842 -S4 _ MANUAL z. 22 108E26 05/04/89 78.23 ED PHILLIPS 50-4626 - 842-84 MANUAL = 23 108E26 05/04/89 153.22 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL ' 3 24 108E26 05/04/89 813.06 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 3 25 10SE26 05/04/89 549.31 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 3 26 10BE26 05/04/89 206.15 ED PHILLIPS 50-4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 3 3 2' 1O8E2G O$/�4/_8_9. 417.62 ED 50-4628- 822 -82 MANUAL a 211 108E26 05/04/89 28.15 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 3 29 108E26 05/04/89 670.44 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 3 3 30 108E26 05/04/89 198.00 ED PHILLIPS 50-4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 4 31 108E26 05/04/89 633.60 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 842-84 MANUAL 4 32 108E26 05/04/89 771.99 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 4 33 A48E26 05/04/89 _ 390.38 ED PHILLIPS 50-4628- 862 -86 I° MANUAL _ a 34 5,846.01 * 4 4 35 4 37 J° 108G82 05/04/89 5.94- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 822 -82 4' MANUAL 5 5 39 05/04/89 45.34- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL p 40 _ __108.0" 108G82 -- 05/04/89 129.18- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 _ MANUAL 41 108682 05/04/89 47.16- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 5' 5'. 4 108G82 05/04/89 2,267.03 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 5 63 108682 05/08/69 126.08 GRIGGS COOPER LIQUOR 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 5' 44 108682 05/04/89 60332.81 GRIGGS COOPER 50-4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 5' 51 45 1.08G82 05/04/89 2,357.83 GRIGGS COOPER 50 -4GEG- 862 -86 MANUAL 'el a6 106G82 05/04/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50-4628-822 -82 MANUAL ° 67 108G82 05/04/69 63.95- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628- 822-82 MANUAL ° 6: 48 10,792.18 49 G' 50 51 i+** —CKS I6 6' 52 108J62 05/04/89 3.13 JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 61 63 108J62 05/04/89 3.13- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL �7 R4 IOSJ62 05/04/89 29.31- JOHNSON WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 7: 55 108J62 05/04/89 2.48- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 7 56 57 108J62 05/04/89 3.13- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 7' 71 71 4i 1989 OF EDINA turd[ MA nATC AMAt1uT v d v v 8` r v r v CHECK STER urunnO TTCM nuOPOTOTTAM 04-30 -8. AGE 9 ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. M MESSAGE 2 108J62 05/04/89 107.68- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL ' 10016 _4a9 20.88- JOHNSON WINE 50-3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 4 108J62 05/04/89 7.07- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 5 IOSJ62 05/04/89 4.34- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 6 108J62 05/04/89 81.55- JOHNSON WINE SO- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 7 108J62 05/04/89 3.72- JOHNSON WINE 50-3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 6 108J62 05/04/89 1,466.52 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822-82 MANUAL 9 108J62 05/04/89 111.22— - JOHNSON WINE 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 10 IOSJ62 05/04/89 6.49 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL t1 108J62 05/04/89 5,384.31 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 12 108J62 05/04/89 24.50 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 13 108J62 05/04/89 4,075.86 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 14 108J62 05/04/89 16.45 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862-86 MANUAL 15 108J62 05/04/89 4.20 JOHNSON WINE 50-4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 16 108J62 05/04/89 248.64 JOHNSON WINE 50-4628-822-82 MANUAL 17 108J62 05/04/89 315.26— JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 16 108J62 05/04/89 8.29— JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 19' 108J62 05/04/89 313.16 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 20 108J62 05/04/89 315.26 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 21 108J62 05/04/89 2.10 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 22 108J62 05/04/89 17.15 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 23 108J62 05/04/89 720.73 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL L4 IOSJ62 05/04/89 2,087.30 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 25 108J62 05/04/89 3.50 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 26 IOSJ62 05/04/89 433.06 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862-86 MANUAL 27 IOSJ62 05/04/89 371.58 JOHNSON WINE SO- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 20 108J62 05/04/89 8.40 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 29 30 14,804.30 31 32 • *rot• # # - 33 108P20 05/04/89 80.25 PAUSTIS & SONS - 50-4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 34 108P20 05/04/89 225.17 PAUSTIS & SONS 50 -4623- 862 -86 MANUAL 35 108P2o 05/04/89 3.00 PAUSTIS 6 SONS 50- 4628 - 862-86 MANUAL 36 108P20 05/08/69 75.00 PAUSTIS 6 SONS MIX 50-4632 - 862-86 MANUAL 37 38 383.42 t 39 111111 * ** -CKS 40 41 108P82 05/04/89 5.04- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 42 1o8P82 05/04/89 7.79- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710-842 -84 MANUAL 43 108P82 05/04/89 1.83- PRIOR WINE 50-3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 44 108P82 O5/04/89 1.83- PRIOR WINE SO- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 45 108P82 05/04/89 12.58- .PRIOR WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 46 1O8P82 05/04/89 252.23 PRIOR WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 47 108P82 05/04/89 389.36 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 48 108P82 05/04/89 91.40 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 49 108P82 OS/04/89 91.40 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL s0 108P82 05/04/89 628.80 PRIOR WINE SO -4625- 862 -86 MANUAL s1 108P82 05/08/89 45.03 PRIOR WINE MIX SO -4632- 822 -82 MANUAL , 52 53 1,469.15 t 54 111111 * ** -CKS s6 57 108016 05/04/89 8.40- QUALITY WINE 50-3700 - 662-86 MANUAL q - 2 3 4 �.. 5 5 7 IL � >, u fe IF ,s 2: 21 ,y 12; 2. ze 2( � r zs — — z ✓ 3C 31 L 3' 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 AG G/ 47 46 40 SC 51 52 53 54 55 ti 56 57 vw 1989 CITY OF EDINA rurru NA nATC AMAIINT CHECK REGISTER 04 -30 -89 PAGE 10 VFNTIAR TTFM IIFACRTPTTON ACCOUNT NO TNV 0 P 0. 0 MF�'�AGF 108016 05/04/89 1.19- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL .- .108016_- - - - - -- 05/-04/89 -__ -- - ._..34- - - -- QUALITY WINE ---------- v___�__ -- - -50= 3710-822 -82 - -- ----- - - - - -- MANUAL - -- - 108016 05/04/89 27.02- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 108016 05/04/89 2.86- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 108016 05/04/89 9.24— QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 108016 05/04/89 1.98— QUALITY WINE 50-3710- 842 -84 MANUAL_ 108016 05/04/89 2.15— QUALITY WINE 50-3710- 842 -84 MANUAL — _108016_ -_— 05/04/8 -9 _ 05/04/89 4.�3— 67.39— QUALITY QUALITY WINE WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL D108016 108016 05/04/89 10.06- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 10_8016 05/04_/89 2.88- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 108016 05/04/89 73.23- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 108016 05/04/89 .26 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL __1_08016_ 05/04/89 _R..08- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 108016 05/04/89 .70- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710-86 ^2 -86 MANUAL 108Q16 05/04/89 11350.35 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 108016 05/04/89 236.72 QUALITY WINE 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 108016 05/04/89 142.96 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 108016 05/04/89 3,368.91 QUALITY WINE 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 108016 05/04./89 31661.74 _ QUALITY WINE 50-4626-862 -86 MANUAL 108016 05/04/89 35.90 QUALITY WINE 50-4628-822-82 MANUAL 108016 05/04/89 118.60 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 -822 -82 MANUAL 108016 05/04/89 197.45 QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 108016 05/04/89 213.44 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 108016 05/04/89 921.35 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL j 108016 05/04/89 69.00 QUALITY WINE 50- 462228- 862 -86 MANUAL J 108016 05/04/89 1,003.50 QUALITY WINE 50 -4G28- 862 -86 MANUAL 108016 05/04/89 25.75- QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 108016 05/04/89 206.25 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862-86 MANUAL 108016 05/04/89 .00 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 108016 05/04/89 287.20 QUALITY WINE 50-4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 11,573.61 * 108T49 05/04/89 13.45- TOW DISTRIBUTING SO-4628-822-82 MANUAL 108T49 05/04/89 26.90 TOW DISTRIBUTING 50-4628- 822 -82 MANUAL -- JALST49 05/04/89 96.20 TOW DISTRIBUTING 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 109.65 * d * * * ** 109740 05/08/89 673.75 CAROLS DRAPES DRAPES 27- 1332 - 000 -00 MANUAL 673.75 * 109741 05/08/89 1,618.40 WESTSIDE EQUIP - GAS TANK 27 -1300- 001 -00 MANUAL 1,618.40 * 109P70 05/08/89 150.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 10 -4290- 510 -51 MANUAL 150.00 * dMd * ** * * * —CKS Li 05108/$9 _ 300.00 THEATER 65 _ COUNCIL VOL BANQUET - 10 -4201- 100 -10 _ MANUAL 1989 OF EDINA r: PWWP [ MA AATF AMAl1NT Ilei i nk za ,� ze 6 27 za 2E 3C 31 32 �w �m 4 4: 4: 4. 4! 41 4 41 4! 71 wom m Imm CHECK STER 04 -30 -8. .AGE 11 VCWAAP TTFM nrQP0TPTTAM ArPnIIMT NA TAIV 8 P A Y MG44A1^_L %r V 300.00 * 110753 05/08/89 100.00 TRUDY FINDEN COUNCIL VOL BANQUET 10- 4201 - 100 -10 MANUAL 100.00 * 110754 05/08/89 75.00 LYNN PETERSON COUNCIL VOL BANQUET 10 -4201- 100 -10 MANUAL 75.00 * rrrrrr * * * -CKS 114P36 05/08/89 19.00 PETTY CASH CLASS FEE 10 -4201- 643 -64 MANUAL 114P36 05/08/89 1.75 PETTY CASH PARKING 10- 4202- 140 -14 MANUAL 114P36 05/08/89 30.00 PETTY CASH CLASS 10- 4202- 490 -49 MANUAL 114P36 05/08/89 8.00 PETTY CASH PARKING 10- 4202 - 600 -60 MANUAL 114P36 05/08/89 38.21 PETTY CASH MEETING EXP 10 -4206- 100 -10 MANUAL 114P36 05/08/89 25.40 PETTY CASH MEETING EXP 10 -4206- 140 -14 MANUAL 114P36 05/08/89 6.00 PETTY CASH MEETING EXP 10- 4206 - 200 -20 MANUAL 114P36 05/08/89 8150 PETTY CASH PARKING 10- 4208 - 140 -14 MANUAL 114P36 05/08/89 1.50 PETTY CASH PARKING 10 -4208- 160 -16 MANUAL 114P36 05/08/89 1.65 PETTY CASH PARKING 10- 4208 - 480 -48 MANUAL 114P36 05/08/89 3.50 PETTY CASH PARKING 10 -4208- 490 -49 MANUAL 114P36 05/08/89 25.45 PETTY CASH PARKING 10- 4504 - 140 -14 MANUAL 114P36 05/08/89 24.65- PETTY CASH PARKING 10-4504 - 140 -14 MANUAL 114P36 05/08/89 25.45- PETTY CASH PARKING 10 -4504- 140 -14 MANUAL 114P36 05/06/89 24.65 PETTY CASH PARKING 10- 4504 - 140 -14 MANUAL 114P36 05/08/89 25.45 PETTY CASH GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 140 -14 MANUAL 114P36 05/08/89 24.65 PETTY CASH GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 140 -14 MANUAL 114P36 05/08/89 40.10 PETTY CASH GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 160 -16 MANUAL 114P36 05/08/89 8.26 PETTY CASH GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 200-20 MANUAL 114P36 05/08/89 16.37 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10-4504-260-26 MANUAL 114P36 05/08/89 7.32 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10-4504- 520-52 MANUAL 114P36 05/08/89 6.86 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10-4504-624 -62 MANUAL 114P36 05/08/89 18.29 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 627 -62 MANUAL 114P36 05/08/89 10.46 PETTY CASH GUN RANGE 10- 4624 - 722 -72 MANUAL 114P36 05/08/89 43.88 PETTY CASH MEETING EXP 28 -4206- 702 -70 MANUAL 114P36 05/08/89 21.12 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 702 -70 MANUAL 114P36 05/08/89 25.48 PETTY CASH PRINTING 28- 4600 - 702 -70 MANUAL 114P36 05/08/89 9.74 PETTY CASH LIQUOR 50- 4504 - 860-86 MANUAL, 114P36 05/08/89 2.00 PETTY CASH EASEMENT 60- 1300 - 286 -04 MANUAL 403.51 irlwwwo 05/08/89 90.00 AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT SEMINAR, CONFERENCE 10- 4202 - 440 -44 * * *' KS 90.00+ 116EII 05/04/89 4.93- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 116E11 05/04/69 7.02- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 116EII 05/04/89 26.62- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 116E11 05/04/89 246.70 EAGLE WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 116EII 05/04/89 351.02 EAGLE WINE 50-4628-842-84 MANUAL 116E11 05/04/89 1,331.16 EAGLE WINE 50-4628- 862-66 MANUAL 1,890.31 rrrrrr * * * -CKS 116E26 05/04/69 1.92- ED PHILLIPS 50-3710-822-62 MA AL 116E26 05/04/89 3.42- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL %r V qw I 1989 CITY OF EDINA CIA AwTC AYAII►IT QP 2 3 4 6 7 9 u 11 zc k'- 12 f Z t / Z 0 3 3 IT 13 3: 31 3" �l 31 Y 31 41 Q-4 4; C 4 4, 41 'y 4' 41 5, e S'. �G S, a S' �z Co i CHECK REGISTER 04 -30 -89 PAGE 12 urunno ?TOM nPQr0TPTTnN ArrnuNT Nn TNV 0 P O_ N MESSAGE 116E26 05/04/89 13.20- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 6E26 07- Ep PHJ_L -LL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 116E26 05/04/89 1.16- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 116E26 05/04/89 9.34- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 116E26 05/04/89 8.50- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710-842 -84 MANUAL 116E26 05/04/89 10.99- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 116E26 05/04/89 18.34- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 115E26 41 - ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 116E26 05/04/89 6.62- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 116E26 05/04/89 660.30 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 116E26 05/04/89 425.13 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 842-84 MANUAL 116E26 05/04/89 58.10 ED PHILLIPS 50-4626- 842-84 MANUAL 116E26 05/04/89 917.49 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626-862 -86 MANUAL L6.E26 05 0 192.60 ED PHILLIPS 50-4628- 822-82 MANUAL 116E26 05/04/89 342.19 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628-822 -82 MANUAL 116E26 05/04/89 407.53 ED PHILLIPS 50-4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 116E26 05/04/89 1,099.26 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 116E26 05/04/89 934.95 ED PHILLIPS 50-4628- 842 -$4 MANUAL 116E26 05/04/89 662.53 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862-86 MANUAL 8 e 2- ED PHILLIPS 50-4628-862 -86 MANUAL 116E26 05/04/89 736.89 ED PHILLIPS 50-4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 6,329.83 s ssssss * ** -CKS 16G82 05/04/89 9.68- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL 116G82 05/04/89 58.25- GRIGGS COOPER 50 -3700- 862 -86 MANUAL 116682 05/04/89 55.90- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 116G82 05/04/89 66.34- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 116G82 05/04/89 43.05- GRIGGS COOPER 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 116682 05/04/89 2.86- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 1 CBia 05/04/89 139.24- GRIGGS COOPER 50-3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 116G82 05/04/89 2,152.71 GRIGGS COOPER 50-4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 116GBE, 05/04/89 3,317.24 GRIGGS COOPER 50-4626-842 -84 MANUAL 116G82 05/04/89 143.06 GRIGGS COOPER 50-4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 116682 05/04/89 6,962.18 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 11668E 05/04/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 30-4828- 842 -84 MANUAL USE 05/94/89 6.02- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 116682 05/04/69 8.35- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 116682 05/04/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 116682 05/04/89 8.71- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 116682 05/04/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 862-86 MANUAL 12,176.79 s ssssss * ** -CKS 116J62 05/04/89 9.50- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL 116JGE 05/04/89 21.00- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL 116J62 05/04/89 21.00- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3700- 862 -86 MANUAL 116,16e 05/04/89 7.59- JOHNSON WINE 50-3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 116J62 05/04/89 27.01- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 116J62 05/04/89 71.10- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 116J62 05/04/89 24.16- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 116J62 05/04/89 69.45 JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 116,162 05/04/89 69.45- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 73 4 LL f 1989 OF EDINA r rurru MA nAT= CHECK STER AMAIIMT - UCMnAD VTOM nrennrnTInu 04 -30 -6 AGE 13 ACCOUNT NO INV k P 0 N MESSAGE 116J62 05/04/89 14.42- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL IAM 05k04169 69.45- JOHNSON WINE SO- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 116J62 05/04/89 1,355.68 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 116J62 05/04/89 3,569.35 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 116J62 05/04/89 13.36- JOHNSON WINE 50-4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 116J62 05/04/89 3,472.53 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 116J62 05/04/89 3,486.53 JOHNSON WINE 50-4626- $62 -86 MANUAL 116I62 05/04/89 14.00 JOHNSON WINE -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL ' 116J62 05/04/89 3,486.53- JOHNSON WINE _50 50 -4G26- 862 -86 MANUAL ' 116J62 05/04/89 10.15 JOHNSON WINE 50-4628- 822 -82 MANUAL t 116J62 05/04/89 .00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL ' 116J62 05/04/89 757.12 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628-822 -$2 MANUAL ' 116J62 05/04/89 .00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628-842-84 MANUAL ' 116J62 05/04/89 2,453.86 JOHNSON WINE 50-4628-842 -84 MANUAL ' 116J62 05/04/89 .00 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 116J62 05/04/89 20.65 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL ' 116J62 05/04/89 1,440.66 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL ' 12,815.41 « « « « « «« . « = -CKS ' 116P62 OS/04/89 10.36- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 822-82 MANUAL 116P82 05/04/89 16.88- PRIOR WINE 50-3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 116P82 05/04/89 10.44- PRIOR WINE 50-3710- 862 -$6 MANUAL 116P62 05/04/89 10.44- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 116P82 05/04/89 10.44 PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -66 MANUAL 116P82 05/04/89 518.24 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- $22 -82 MANUAL 116P82 05/04/89 843.88 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628-842 -84 MANUAL 116P82 05/04/89 522.17 PRIOR WINE 50-462$- 862 -86 MANUAL 116P82 05/04/69 522.17- PRIOR WINE 50- 4628-862 -86 MANUAL 116P8t 05/04/89 512.17 PRIOR WINE SO- 4628- $62 -$6 MANUAL 116P$2 05/08/89 40.13 PRIOR WINE mix 50-463Z-82Z -8Z MANUAL 1,886.74 ¢ say -Ct(S 116016 05/04/89 4.16- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 116016 05/04/89 36.41- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 116016 05/04/89 36.41- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 116016 05/04/89 .43- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 116016 05/04/89 .90- QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 116016 05/04/89 36.41 QUALITY WINE SO- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 116016 OS/04/89 4.43- QUALITY WINE SO- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 11.6016 05/04/89 12.71- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL , 116016 05/04/89 80.53- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 116016 05/04/89 5.51- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL ' 116016 05/04/89 1.67- QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 116016 05/04/89 .36- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 116016 05/04/89 .52- QUALITY WINE SO- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 116016 05/04/89 .75- QUALITY WINE SO- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 116Q16 05/04/89 65.02- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 116016 05/04/89 1,821.16- QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 116016 05/04/89 1,821.16 QUALITY WINE 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL , 116016 05/04/89 1,821.16 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 116016 05/04/89 4,025.78 QUALITY WINE 50 -4626- 842-84 MANUAL 2 3 dr ' — a e 9 10 11 12 13 * 14 LH 17 1a 17 1e 19 zo 21 22 ^ 23 24 zs 26 E 27 28 4 � ]O 31 i 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT CHECK REGISTER VENDOR TTEM DERCRTPTION 04 -30 -89 PAGE 14 ACCOUNT NO INV_ 0 P O. 4 MESSAGE 116Q16 05/04/89 3,250.37 QUALITY WINE 50-4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 1 6916, 0510.4E @9 415.60 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 116016 05/04/89 89.75 QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 116016 05/04/89 43.00 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 116416 05/04/89 440.20 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 116016 05/04/89 1,268.30 QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 116016 05/04/89 166.40 QUALITY WINE 50-4628-862 -86 MANUAL 116 Qi6 OSLO-4/89 51.75 QUALITY WINE 50-4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 116016 05/04/89 550.40 QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 116016 05/04/89 35.90 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 116416 05/04/89 74.95 QUALITY WINE SO- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 12,020.16 * *•** ** * ** -CKS 116505 05/04/89 101.00 SALUD AMERICA 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 101.00 * ** *+s* * ** -CKS 116T49 05/04/89 115.85 TOW DISTRIBUTING SO -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 116T49 05/04/69 40.35 TOW DISTRIBUTING SO -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 156.20 * ** *+*+ ** *-CKS 117C33 05/08/89 2,031.25 EMPLOYEES CLUB REIMBURSEMENT 10- 1130 - 000 -00 MANUAL 2,031.25 * ** ** ** * ** -CKS 117GO9 05/08/89 25.00 GOVT TRAIN SERV SEMINAR 10 -2148- 000-00 MANUAL 25.00 * ss• + ++ * ** -CKS 117P70 05/08/89 480.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 10 -4290- 510 -51 MANUAL s * +ss• * ** -CKS 118C33 05/08/89 17,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 118C33 05/08/89 17,000.00- CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL .00 * ss +sss * ** -CKS 4 „7.e 06 409,489 90.00 AIRGRAF T SEMINAR REG;STRATIAN 10- 2- Ga- 440 -44 MANUAL 0 • + ++ +s *w*-CKS 122EII 05/04/89 8.63- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 122E11 05/04/89 5.70- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 64L' -84 MANUAL 122EII 05/04/89 29.74- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710-862-86 MANUAL , s 0 4 e I ` , s 0 4 e L 1989 OF EDINA r empru un nATF AMAIINT , , , , , , , 2 2 21 P \ 2, V 2, 25 35 3' 3: 3: 31 35 3: 3, 3S 4f 41 4: 4; 4� 4! 4( 4: 41 s1 s s: s: s. 7: 51 CHECK STER 04 -30-9. iGE 15 ` VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. M MESSAGE 122E11 05/04/89 431.69 EAGLE WINE 50-4628-822 -82 MANUAL 122E11 05/04/89 282.11 - e8S-+4- EAGLE WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 122E11 05/04/89 1,487.01 EAGLE WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 2,156.74* 2, 169.74 rrrrrr * ** -CKS 1222! 0/ /89 3.24- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL ' 122E26 05/04/89 7.68- ED PHILLIPS 50-3710 - 822 -52 MANUAL 122E26 05/04/89 7.19- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -$2 MANUAL 12ZE26 05/04/89 5.58- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 842 -54 MANUAL 122E26 05/04/69 12.65- ED PHILLIPS 50-3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 122E26 05/04/89 8.26- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 542-84 MANUAL 1.22E26 05/04/69 28.13- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710-842 -84 MANUAL 122E26 05/04/89 28.33- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 122E26 05/04/89 20.42- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710-862 -86 MANUAL 122E26 05/04/89 6.59- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 122E26 05/04/69 359.88 ED PHILLIPS 50-4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 122E26 05/04/89 1,406.85 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 122E26 05/04/89 279.18 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4626- 842 -54 MANUAL 12EE26 05/04/89 1,416.72 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626-862 -86 MANUAL 122E26 05/04/89 42.00- ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 122E26 05/04/89 768.00 ED PHILLIPS SO- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 122E26 05/04/89 324.24 ED PHILLIPS 50-4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 122E26 05/04/89 826.12 ED PHILLIPS SO- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 122E26 05/04/89 1,265.40 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 122E26 05/04/89 659.10 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 122E26 05/04/89 2,042.38 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 122E26 05/08/89 73.75 ED PHILLIPS BEER 50- 4630 - 842 -84 MANUAL 122E26 05/08/69 142.25 ED PHILLIPS BEER 50- 4630-862 -86 MANUAL 9,393.80 rrrrrr * ** -CKS 122G82 05/04/89 28.37- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL 122G82 05/04/89 108.95- GRIGGS COOPER 50-3700- 86E -86 MANUAL 122G82 05/04/89 32.45- GRIGGS COOPER 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 122G82 05/04/89 43.05- GRIGGS COOPER 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 12EG82 05/04/89 15.74- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 122G82 05/04/89 155.62- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 122G82 05/04/89 162.32- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 122G82 05/04/89 1,622.66 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 122682 05/04/89 2,152.71 GRIGGS COOPER 50-4626 - 622 -82 MANUAL 122GSE 05/04/89 7,780.95 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 122G82 05/04/89 787.00 GRIGGS COOPER 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 12EG82 05/04/89 81116.15 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 122G82 05/04/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 122G82 05/04/89 28.96- GRIGGS COOPER SO -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 122G82 05/04/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 12EG82 05/08/89 79.62 GRIGGS COOPER MIX 50 -4632- 822 -82 MANUAL e 19,963.63 rrrrr* * ** —CKS 122J62 05/04/89 10.40— — 10.46 -- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710— S22 -82 MANUAL EL'■ Vr 2 3 4 e 7 e e ,1 4" It 4 ,: ,1 121, 21 ^ e 2. z, 2• �MI21 2; W 6I 2` 3[ 31 `, 13: fo 3E 3( 3i r 31 c 3% 4( 41 4: 4: 4 41 op 4' 41 M 51 5' 5: 5: 5, 3! 51 1989 CITY OF EDINA rWPr [ Mn nATF ANAIINT CHECK REGISTER 04 -30 -89 PAGE 16 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. k MESSAGE 122J62 05/04/89 8.50- JOHNSON WINE 50-3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL — 1.22J62 05/09189 9.81- J0R"-OX-RI NE 50-3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 12EJ62 05/04/89 138.44- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 122J62 05/04/89 17.43- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 122J62 05/04/89 83.20- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 122J62 05/04/89 2.45 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 122,162 05/04/89 519.92 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 1.22,/62 0SLQ4L8. INE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 122J62 05/04/89 6,922.47 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 122 ,162 05/04/89 4,159.29 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 122J62 05/0_4/89 19.60 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 128,162 05/04/89 848.76 JOHNSON WINE 50-4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 122J62 05/04/89 9.80 JOHNSON WINE 50-4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 1_i:2J_6.2 05/9_4/89 982.08 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 122,162 05/04/89 15.75 JOHNSON WINE 50-4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 12EJ62 05/04/89 3.64- JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 122J62 05/04/89 26.95 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628-862 -86 MANUAL IEEJ62 05/04/89 1,746.13 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 15,012.58* 5, 018.Se - rrrrrr * ** -CKS 122P20 05/04/89 4.00 PAUSTIS d SONS 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 1EEP20 05/04/89 187.25 PAVSTIS d SONS 50-4628 - 822-82 MANUAL 122P20 05/04/89 101.25 PAVSTIS & SONS 50-4628-842 -84 MANUAL E2P20 05/04/89 4.00 PAVSTIS Q SONS 50- 4628-842 -84 MANUAL 122P20 05/04/89 174.25 PAUSTIS 6 SONS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 122P20 05/04/89 3.00 PAUSTIS S SONS 50 -462S- 842-84 MANUAL 122P20 05/04/89 4.00 PAVSTIS & SONS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 122P20 05/04/89 197.95 PAUSTIS R SONS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 122P20 05/08/89 50.00 PAUSTIS & SONS Mix 50- 4632 - 842 -84 MANUAL 725.70 • rrrrrr * ** -CKS 122P82 05/04/89 7.70- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710-822 -82 MANUAL 122P82 05/04/89 20.63- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 22P82 05/04/89 14.14- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710-862-86 MANUAL 122P82 05/04/89 364.89 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 122P82 05/08/89 19.95 PRIOR WINE WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 122P82 05/04/89 1,031.54 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 122P82 05/04/89 706.89 PRIOR WINE 50-4628- 862-86 MANUAL 122PS2 OS/06/89 93.77 PRIOR WINE MIx 50-4632 - 822 -82 MANUAL P 82 OS/00/89 95.91 PRIOR WINE MIx 50-4632 - 842 -84 MANUAL 2,270.48 • rrrrrr * ** -CKS 122Q16 65/04/89 4.63- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 122016 05/04/89 15.15- QUALITY WINE 50-3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 122016 05/04/89 2.44- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 122016 05/04/89 11.25- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 122016 05/04/89 78.45- QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 122016 05/04/89 2.25- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 122016 05/04/89 2.65- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL i t Lli 1989 OF EDINA L rurru MA nATV ANn11NT 1 2 _ 3 4 � 3 e �e _ e n 1+ u z, V. 2, T 21 z, 3( 3' 31 31 3; 31 3'. 41 4' ` 4: 4: 4. 4' 41 47 41 4, 51 5 5. S; 5, S' 51 7. CHECK STER 04 -30 -8� ,GE 17 VFNnOR TTFM nFACRIPTTON ACCOUNT NO INV_ # P.O. 11 MESSAGE 122016 05/04/89 1.04— QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862-86 MANUAL 2 -016 05/04/89 10.51— QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 122016 05/04/89 .26 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 122916 05/04/89 4.27— QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 122016 05/04/89 8.87— QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 122Q16 05/04/89 87.91— QUALITY WINE 50-3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 122Q16 05/04/89 756.80 QUALITY WINE 50-4626— S22 -82 MANUAL 22Q16 05089 112.25 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 542 -84 MANUAL 12EQ16 05/04/89 3,920.78 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626-842-84 MANUAL 122016 05/04/89 4,394.53 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 122016 05/04/89 525.01 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 122016 05/04/89 461.40 QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 122016 05/04/89 243.40 QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 122016 05/04/89 11119-00 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 122916 05/04/89 263.90 QUALITY WINE 50-4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 122016 05/04/89 25.75— QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862-86 MANUAL 122016 05/04/89 425.20 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 122016 OS/04/89 103.50 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 122016 05/04/89 882.80 QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 12,9S3.66 * 111111 * ** —CKS 122T49 05/04/89 94.80 TOW DISTRIBUTING 50- 4628- 862 -56 MANUAL 94.80 + 111111 * ** —CKS 123R69 05/08/89 100.00 K ROSLAND LIQUOR STORE MEETING 50- 4206- 820 -82 MANUAL 123R69 05/0$/89 100.00 K ROSLAND LIQUOR STORE MEETING 50-4806-840 -84 MANUAL 123R69 05/08/89 100.00 K ROSLAND LIQUOR STORE MEETING 50-4206 - 340-54 MANUAL 123869 05/08/89 100.00— K ROSLAND LIQUOR STORE MEETING 50-4206- 840-84 MANUAL 123R69 05/08/89 100.00 K ROSLAND LIQUOR STORE MEETING 50-4806- 860 -86 MANUAL 300.00 + 111111 ***—CKS 125,783.81 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 1,933.77 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER 89.11 FUND 26 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUND 14,109.98 FUND 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND 11,417.34 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND 156.73 FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND 11,122.86 FUND 30 TOTAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 22,214.32 FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND 224,261.04 824,263.98 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 2.00 FUND 60 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 11,090.96* 411,093,90 TOTAL