HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-08-07_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AUGUST 7, 1989
7:00 P.M.
(Convene Joint ERA /Council Meeting)
ROLLCALL
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JOINT MEETING HRA /COUNCIL OF JUNE 5, 1989
II. EDINA HOMESTEAD DEVELOPMENT /RPI SERVICES (Contd from 7/24/89 - Continue to 9%5/89)
.A. Final Rezoning PRD -4, Planned Residence District to PSR -4, Senior Citizen
District (Council)
B. Final Plat Approval - Outlot A, Ebenezer Society 1st Addition (Council)
C. Tax Increment Financing Assistance (HRA)
III. AWARD OF BIDS
A. Centennial Lakes - Phase I Lake Construction (HRA)
B. Centennial Lakes - Condominiums Residential Amenities (HRA)
IV. ADJOURNMENT OF HRA
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
PROCLAMATION - CONSTITUTION WEEK (DAR)
ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS All agenda items marked with an asterick ( *)
and in bold print are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one
motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Council
member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from
the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda.
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of Regular Meeting of June 19, 1989
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk
Presentation by Planner. Public comments heard. Motion to close hearing.
Zoning? Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote
of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable
rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Final Development
Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/4 favorable rollcall vote
required to pass.
A. Findings. Decision and Reasons - Lot 9, White Oaks 2nd Addition
III. PUBLIC HEARING ON EASEMENT VACATION Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If
Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote
require to pass.
A. Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easement - Lot 6, Block 1, Indian Hills
West (6728 Apache Rd)
IV. ORDINANCES First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second
Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of all members of Council required
to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members
of Council required to pass.
A. Personnel Ordinance No. 122
V. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
Agenda
City of Edina
August 7, 1989
Page Two
VI. AWARD OF BIDS
A. Playground Equipment - McGuire Park
B. Arneson House Addition - Historical Society Building
C. Resurfacing of Tennis Courts
VII. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Metropolitan Council - Population Estimate
B. Appointment - Community Education Services Board
VIII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS
A. Petition of Adjacent Residents - Grand View Park Cemetery
IX. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
A. 1989 NLC Congress of Cities - November 25 -29 - Atlanta
X. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
XI. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
XII. FINANCE
A. 1988 Audit Findings
B. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated August 7, 1989:- General Fund
$171,536.74, CDBG $475.00,.Communications $298.75, Art Center $2,490.91,
Capital Fund $5,131.32, Swimming Pool Fund $1,214.56, Golf Course Fund
$38,686.41, Recreation Center Fund $7,146.44, Gun Range Fund $955.60,
Edinborough Park $7,939.30, Utility Fund $238,013.07, Storm Sewer Utility
$2,975.90, Liquor Dispensary Fund $1,831.12, Construction Fund $11,465.09,
Total $490,160.21.
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Tues Aug 8 1990 Budget Hearing
Thurs Aug 10 1990 Budget Hearing
Sun Aug 13 Ground Breaking - Edina Historical Society
Mon Aug 21 Council /Human Relations Commission
Mon Aug 21 Regular Council Meeting
Tues Aug 22 Annual Braemar Inspection Tour
Tues Sept 5 Regular Council Meeting
Mon Sept 18 Regular Council Meeting
0
5:00 p.m.
5:00 p.m.
3 -5 p.m.
6:00 p.m.
7:00 p.m.
Braemar G
7:00 p.m.
7:00 p.m.
Mgrs Conf Rm
Mgrs Conf Rm
Arneson Acres
Council Room
Council Room
olf Course
Council Room
Council Room
�w
MINUTES OF THE JOINT MEETING OF THE
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY /COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY HALL
JUNE 5, 1989
A joint meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the City
Council was convened to consider: 1) Hawthorn Hotel Development, 2) Conveyance of
Phase II Condominiums - Centennial Lakes, 3) Award of Bids - Centennial Lakes -
Phase I Deck Waterproofing, 4) Tax Increment Financing Assistance - RPI Services -
Edina Homestead, and 5) Resolution Adopting Special Law Relating to Edina Transit
System & Public Bidding.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners /Members Paulus, Rice and Richards.
(Commissioner /Member Kelly arrived at 7:20 p.m.)
MINUTES of the Joint BRA /Council Meeting of April 17, 1989 were approved by motion
of Commissioner/Member Paulus, seconded by Commissioner/Member Rice.
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Richards
Motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARING ON EDINBOROUGH - HAWTHORN HOTEL DEVELOPMENT CONTINUED INDEFINITELY
Assistant Manager Gordon Hughes informed the Council that the proponents, Hawthorn
Suits Hotel, had asked for an indefinite continuance of their request for Rezoning
and Final Development Plan approval. He explained that continuing the hearing
indefinitely would mean a new hearing date would be set, with,notice mailed and
published, when they wished to have the proposed development back on the Agenda.
Motion was made by Commissioner/Member Rice to continue indefinitely the public
hearing on Edinborough - Hawthorn Hotel Development. Motion was seconded by
Commissioner /Member Paulus.
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Richards
Motion carried.
PHASE II CONDOMINIUMS - CENTENNIAL LAKES CONVEYED HRA Executive Director Hughes
advised that the condominiums developer is ready to proceed with construction of
the Phase II condominium building - Centennial Lakes. Closing of this conveyance
is expected on or about June 9, 1989 with construction to follow immediately.
Staff would recommend that the HRA.authorize the Chairman and Secretary to execute
documents conveying the Phase II condominium lot to the developer. The land will
be conveyed on the same terms and conditions as Phase I was conveyed.
• Commissioner Rice said there has been discussion that some changes may be made,
e.g. installation of an elevator. Director Hughes said that if there is a change
it would happen with the Phase III building and the developer would come before
the HRA at that time to justify any proposed change.
Chairman Richards called for public comment on the proposed conveyance of Phase II
condominiums. No comment being heard, Commissioner Paulus introduced the
following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION RATIFYING AND AUTHORIZING THE
EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF VARIOUS DOCUMENTS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "BRA "), as follows:
1. Recitals. The BRA and the Edina City. Council have previously approved a
redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.421, subdivision
15, designated as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, and have approved
various amendments thereto (as so amended, the "Redevelopment Plan "). Acting
pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan, the BRA has acquired certain land in the area
included in the Redevelopment Plan and it has been.proposed that the BRA sell and
transfer a portion of such land to the East Edina Housing Foundation (the
"Foundation "), pursuant to a Land Sale Agreement by and between the BRA and the
Foundation (the "Agreement "). By a resolution adopted March 7, 1988, the BRA
w'
approved the form of the Agreement and authorized any two officers of the HRA to
execute and deliver the Agreement on behalf of the HRA with such modifications as
were deemed appropriate and approved by the Chairman and the Executive Director of
the BRA. Pursuant to such authorization the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the HRA
executed and delivered the Agreement dated on or as of March 14, 1988.
Subsequently, by resolution dated September 12, 1988, the HRA approved execution
and delivery by any two officers of the BRA, on behalf of the HRA, of an Amended
and Restated Land Sale Agreement and Contract for Private Redevelopment between
the HRA and Foundation with such modifications as the attorney for.the HRA and
Executive Director of the BRA should approve (the "Amended Agreement "). Pursuant
to such authorization the Chairman and Secretary of the HRA executed and delivered
the Amended Agreement dated on or as of September 30, 1988. In connection with
the transactions contemplated by the Amended Agreement, it is now proposed that
Phase II of the Condominium Development be commenced on the property described on
Exhibit A hereto (the "Phase II Condominium Property ") and that the Phase II
Condominium Property be conveyed pursuant to the Amended Agreement and on the same
terms and conditions as the Phase I Condominium Property was conveyed with such
changes and modifications as may be approved by the Executive Director and the
Attorney to the HRA.
2. Authorization for Executiyn and Delivery of Documents. Any two officers
of the HRA are authorized and directed to execute such instruments and agreements
as may be required or be desirable to accomplish the conveyance of the Phase II
Condominium Property pursuant to the Amended Agreement with such changes and
modifications as may be approved by the Executive Director and Attorney for the
HRA. The execution of such instruments and agreements by any two officers of the
HRA shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents by the HRA in
accordance with this Resolution. `
EXHIBIT A
THE HOMES AT CENTENNIAL LAKES
PHASE II CONDOMINIUM LAND DESCRIPTION
All that part of LOT 1, BLOCK 2, SOUTH EDINA DEVELOPMENT ADDITION, according to
the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Commencing at the southeast corner of said LOT 1; thence on an assumed
bearing of North 00 degrees 14 minutes 09 seconds West, along the
easterly line of said LOT 1 for 100.00 feet; thence North 18 degrees 11
minutes 57 seconds East, along said easterly line for 47.23 feet to the
actual point of beginning; thence South 89 degrees 45 minutes 51
seconds West for 148.64 feet; thence North 45 degrees 14 minutes 09
seconds West for 35.67 feet; thence North 00 degrees 14 minutes 09
seconds West for 187.78 feet; thence North 89. degrees 45 minutes 51
seconds East for 25.93 feet; thence North 00 degrees 14 minutes 09
seconds West for 77.00 feet; thence North 89 degrees 45 minutes 51
seconds East for 153.00 feet to said easterly line of LOT 1; thence South 00
degrees 14 minutes 09 seconds East, along said easterly line
for 274.80 feet; thence South 18 degrees 11 minutes 57 seconds West,
along said easterly line for 16.02 feet to the point of beginning.
Dated as of the 5th day of June, 1989.
Attest: Chairman
Executive Director
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Commissioner Rice.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Richards
Resolution adopted.
BID AWARDED FOR CENTENNIAL LAKES - PHASE I DECK WATERPROOFING Executive Director
Hughes explained that the proposed project is the deck waterproofing for the Phase
I Centennial Lakes building. This work is part of the public improvements
undertaken by the HRA that will benefit the condominiums.
Motion was made by Commissioner Rice for award of bid for Centennial Lakes - Phase
I Deck Waterproofing to recommended low bidder, Nichols & Hines, Inc., at
$5,138.00. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Paulus.
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Richards
Motion carried.
REQUEST FOR TAX INCREKENT FINANCING ASSISTANCE - RPI SERVICES - EDINA HOMESTEAD
CONTINUED TO 6/19/89 Executive Director Hughes recalled that on April 3, 1989,
the HRA considered the preliminary request of RPI Services for tax exempt bonds
and tax increment financing assistance for a proposed project in the northwest
quadrant of Parklawn/York Avenues. The proposed project is an 80 dwelling unit
development designed for frail elderly. The project is designed to fill the gap
between traditional senior housing and a rest home. Based upon Council direction
on April 3, staff had met with the developers of the project to outline the terms
of a proposed agreement concerning bond issuance and tax increment financing.
The bonds would be similar to the housing revenue bonds which the City issued for
the Edina Park Plaza and Vernon Terrace projects. Pending federal legislation
would require that 20% of the proposed units be available at rents affordable to.
low and moderate income individuals. Even though this legislation is- pending, if
passed it will impose the 20% requirement on the project. This requirement is.
similar to that imposed at Edina Park Plaza and Vernon Terrace.
The tax exempt bond issue is proposed to be an un -rated issue which would be
privately placed to institutional investors. Under this arrangement, it is felt
that individual local investors would not be affected in the event of a default on -
such bonds.
Director Hughes explained that the proposed tax increment financing assistance for
the project would be similar to that extended to Edina Park Plaza. By way of the
proposed agreement, the HRA would agree to make an annual loan to the project of
$70,000. The annual loans would commence in 1991 and would continue for 20 years
thereafter. Each annual loan would be conditioned upon the following:
1. The tax increment generated from the development would have to be
at least $70,000 annually. If less than $70,000, the annual loan
would be for the actual tax increment generated.
2. The annual loan would be made upon receipt of evidence that the current
year's real estate taxes had been paid.
3. Federal law would have to require that 20% of the units would be
available to low and moderate income residents.
The annual loans would continue for 20 years but not later than 2009. If the
annual payments extend for the full term of 20 years, the project then must repay
all annual loans to the HRA with interest over the subsequent 20 years. If,
however, the project is sold to an unrelated entity, converted to a condominium or
other type of housing, or refinanced, the annual loan payments by the HRA would
terminate and all prior payments made would have to be repaid immediately, but
without interest. The repayment of the annual loans by the HRA would be secured
by a second mortgage.
In connection with the proposed development, the developers are prepared to make a
dedication to the City of $40,000. The developers would also pay all legal fees
incurred by the HRA in connection with the project.
Director Hughes pointed out that the proposed tax increment financing assistance
for this project would result in an essentially risk -free position for the HRA.
Under the proposed agreement, the HRA would make annual loan advances only if the
taxes are paid by the development and only in an amount which does not exceed the
tax increment generated from the payment of such taxes. Increments from other
projects in the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan Area would not be required to
assist the proposed development.
Director Hughes concluded the presentation by saying that if the HRA wished to
assist this project, staff believes that the terms outlined represent fair and
reasonable contribution on the part of the City and the HRA. In light of recent
defaults of housing revenue bonds in the City, the HRA may wish to discuss with
the developers the credit worthiness of the proposed tax exempt bond issue.
There are three approaches that the HRA could take: 1) Insist that this be a rated
bond issue, 2) That the bond issue be an un -rated issue, as proposed by the
developers, that would be sold only to an institutional investor who would submit
to the HRA an investment letter acknowledging that the investor understands the
risks of the. program, with the bonds being issued in large denominations that
would avoid re -sale to small investors, and 3) That the bond issue be rated and
guaranteed but also be required to be sold to an institutional investor.
Director Hughes advised that Larry Olson, RPI Services, was present to answer
questions. Mayor Richards suggested that, because only three Council Members were
present, this matter be continued to June 19, 1989. Director Hughes noted that
final rezoning and plat approval for the development are scheduled for that date.
Mr. Olson suggested that at this time the Council review the work they have done
with the staff to determine if, basically, they are on the track that they were
looking at back in April. Craig Avery, representing the developers, confirmed
that they were here to open the proposal for discussion, that they would be
incurring some costs in negotiating a development agreement with the City and
would be reluctant to do that without additional input from the Council.
Commissioner Paulus asked: 1) How this money would be used in the project, 2) How
this project would avoid the need for refunding of the bonds as was recently done
for the Edina Park Plaza project, and 3)_ Because this project is specialized,
would there be less risk of it not reaching full occupancy. Director Hughes
explained that the tax increment assistance would be directed at providing the
internal subsidy needed to make 20% of the units affordable for low and moderate
income individuals. He said that if a bank would guarantee the bond issue at a
fee, if this were to default the bank would play the role of the FHA as in the
case of Edina Park Plaza, or in essence would provide a safety net for the
bondholders. As to full occupancy, Director Hughes said there is less risk that
it will not be fully occupied because the operating entity in this project is the
same as at 7500 York and there would be somewhat of a captured market. It may be
more risky in that it is a specialized project, e.g. smaller rooms, specialized
arrangement that may make it less adaptable to a re -use for other than frail
elderly. Member Paulus said her concern would be the risk of having to bail out
this project as was done with Vernon Terrace and Edina Park Plaza. Mayor. Richards
said that the City is not at risk on the bonds as it relates to those two
projects. Director Hughes confirmed that both those bond issues and this one are
revenue issues and are backed only by the revenue of the building and are not
backed by the general obligations of the City. A default would not affect the
rating of the City for general obligations bonds per se, but could possibly affect
the marketability.
(Commissioner Kelly entered the meeting at this point.)
Chairman Richards asked if there would be a $40,000 dedication to the City
regardless of what is done on issuance or non - issuance of the bonds. Director
Hughes explained that it is a larger dedication than would be expected under a
traditional park dedication scenario.
Chairman Richards asked what the public benefit would be if the City were to issue
the bonds. Mr. Olson explained that the facility is designed to serve residents
in the local area. Market studies show that approximately 80% of the tenants will
come from within a five mile radius so that there is a direct benefit to the frail
elderly of Edina. Chairman Richards observed that would occur with a market rate
facility also. Mr. Olson said that the structure of the tax increment financing
would be a loan which would be repaid to the City, with repayment secured by a
second mortgage. The non - profit part of the development group is the Ebenezer
Society who will own the property.
Commissioner Kelly said that she looked on this as a unique facility that would
provide a different type of senior housing. Mr. Olson confirmed that it would be
designed to care for the frail elderly in a manner that would provide them the
ability to live with dignity in a more residential type of facility, rather than
an institutional type such as a nursing home. Assisted living has been designed
to meet the unique needs of this segment of the population and is a new and hybrid
type of living arrangement. He said that there is no other facility of this type
other than the one at Minnetonka.
Commissioner Rice commented that he had looked at the Minnetonka facility and
thought it was fabulous. It is fully occupied, is non - subsidized and is doing
well. He asked why there was a need to subsidize the one proposed for Edina. Mr.
Olson explained that the Minnetonka facility was developed in 1983 through Altcare
- a joint venture between General Mills and the Wilder Foundation who contributed
in excess of $1.5 Million to the research and development of the project. The tax
increment assistance on the Edina facility would allow them to serve the 20% low
and moderate income as would be required by pending federal legislation.
Commissioner Rice asked if that is required as of today. Mr. Olson said that it
was not. Mr. Avery elaborated that, if they would go to the market with these
bonds today, bond counsel would not give them an opinion because of the pending
legislation; they would not be marketable without meeting that requirement. The
subsidy would go to the 20% tenants who meet the test for low and moderate income
and who would be subsidized $300 -400 per month. He added that, on the Homestead
project in Minnetonka, General Mills guaranteed the note with the bank.
As to how this would benefit Edina, Mr. Avery said that they have an opinion
letter from their counsel that says they can focus their marketing and set up a
list of only Edina residents who would have first right of refusal if there were a
vacancy in the building. Chairman Richards asked if their market research
indicated that they could not fill the facility with market rate rents of
$1400 -1600 per month. Mr. Avery said he did not know the answer, but
that they do not feel they can build the project without the tax exempt financing
and without the low and moderate income requirement they have to meet as a part of
that. Chairman Richards asked if any profit making organization would be
involved. Mr. Avery said that by law in order to qualify for these housing
revenue bonds it is absolutely necessary, from the time this facility is in use
and during the time those bonds are outstanding, that it be totally owned by a tax
exempt organization. He said Ebenezer will be 100% owners.
Commissioner Rice said he still was confused concerning the effect pending
legislation has on this project and asked when this would be resolved.
Mr. Avery it is his understanding that the pending legislation is a technical
correction to a law that has already been passed and that everyone feels it will
be passed this session with an effective date as of introduction which goes back
to January. He said if for some reason this legislation does not pass they would
not use the tax increment financing at all but would use tax exempt housing bonds
and all units would be market rate. Director Hughes elaborated that tax exempt
would mean the project is exempt from income taxes but is not exempt from real
estate taxes, so it would continue to generate a tax increment.
Commissioner Rice asked for clarification of the repayment of the loan and
interest payment. Director Hughes explained that interest starts to accrue at the
beginning of the repayment period. If at any point prior to the repayment period
the project is sold or converted, the principal amount of the loan is repaid to
the City without interest. If it is after the 20 -year period and a sale occurred
in the 22nd year the repayment would likewise be accelerated but the HRA would
also have accrued two year's interest.
Commissioner Kelly asked if the agreement, whereby if the project is sold the loan
payments would have to be repaid but without interest, is customary and if it is
similar to other projects in the City. Director Hughes said that in the case of
Edina Park Plaza it bore interest. In that situation the 20% requirement was
based on people earning 80% of,the median income; the subject project is based on
people earning 50% of the median income so there is a greater subsidy that needs
to be made for the 20 %. He noted that loans by the HRA are uncommon; typically it
has been a grant to acquire the land in other projects, e.g. South Haven, Summit
Point, Oak Glen. Commissioner Kelly said her concern was that the City is
assisting in these types of projects to meet a need in the community and that she
did not want to make it so easy that the building could be sold to a private party
that would not accommodate those needs.
Chairman Richards stated that he did not think the case had been made for public
assistance and that perhaps it may be better to issue a check each month to those
people who need the subsidy. He alluded to the other two revenue bond issues both
of which are in default and said that of the options suggested by staff he would
opt that if issued the bonds be required to be rated and guaranteed. .
Commissioner Kelly said that she would like to see the market study statistics for
this type of facility to know where they are capturing this type of occupant in
the community.
Commissioner Rice made a motion that the request of RPI Services for tax increment
financing assistance for Edina Homestead be continued to June 19, 1989. Motion
was seconded by Commissioner Kelly.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED APPROVING SPECIAL LAW RELATING TO EDINA TRANSIT SYSTEM
Director Hughes reported that Chapter 241, has been signed into law on May 25,
1989. This law permits the City to operate a public transit system in southeast
Edina and to establish a special service district to provide funding for the
operation of that system. The law also provides that the City of Edina and the
HRA need not require public bidding and performance bonds in connection with
public improvements benefitting housing projects within the Southeast Edina
Redevelopment Plan area.
In order to become effective, the HRA and the City must adopt a resolution which
authorizes acceptance of Chapter 241. Staff would recommend adoption.
Commissioner Rice introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING CHAPTER 241,
MINNESOTA LAWS, 1989
The.Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota hereby approves
Chapter 241, Minnesota Laws, 1989, as required by such law and pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Section 645.021, Subd. 2, and the Executive Director is
directed to file with the Secretary of State a certificate of approval as required
by Minnesota Statutes, Section 645.021, Subd. 3.
Dated this 5th day of June, 1989.
ATTEST:
Chairman
Executive Director
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Commissioner Kelly.
Rollcall: >
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Resolution adopted.
There being no further business on the joint HRA /Council agenda, motion of
Commissioner Kelly was seconded by Commissioner Paulus for adjournment of the HRA.
Motion carried unanimously.
Executive Director
City Clerk
5'� REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: HRA
FROM: GORDON HUGHES
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00
DATE: AUGUST 7, 1989 AGENDA ITEM III . A.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Purchase of retaining wall and pond liner 'for.
Company Centennial Lakes Park. Amount of Quote or Bid
1. 1.
2. 2.
3 SEE ATTACHED TABULATIONS ,
3.
4. 4.
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
VEIT AND COMPANY, INC. $482,628
GENERAL INFORMATION:
The subject bid is for the retaining wall and pond liner
for the central park portion of Centennial Lakes Park.
The Recommended bid is
x
within budget not within
*e . —
Department
Finance Director
Rosland, 0(ity Manager
n�
August 4, 1989
11:00 A.M.
BID TABULATION
CITY OF EDINA. MINNESOTA
IMPROVEMENT NO. PL -1 (HRA)
Centennial Lakes Phase I - Lake Construction
_Engineers Estimate $ 495.500 00
BIDDER
TOTAL
BASE BID
ALT. BID
Veit
& Co.. Inc.
$ 482,628.00
$ 481,798.00
Monette Construction
$502,860.66
$ 495,860.60
Park
Construction Co.
$ 544,656.92
NO
BID
Dean
& Associates. Inc.
$ 628,243.08
$ 600,352.12
George
F. Cook Construction
$ 708.826.94
$ 608,826.94
C.S.
McCrossan. Constr.
$ 857,701.00
$ 847,701.00
_Engineers Estimate $ 495.500 00
Ilk
IMPROVEMENT: PL-1 (HRA) CENTENNIAL LAKES PHASE I - TABULATION OF BIDS PAGE 1 OF 2`
LAKE CONSTRUCTION
BID OPENING AUGUST 4, 1989
ITEM NO.
ITEM
482,628.00
502,860.60
544,656.92
UNIT
QUANTITY
ENGINEERS
U.P.
ESTIMATE
TOTAL
VEIT & CO..
U.P.
INC.
TOTAL
MONETTE
U.P.
CONSTRUCTION
TOTAL
PARK CONSTRUCTION CO.
U.P. TOTAL
2105.501
Common Excavation
LS
1
19,000.00
19,000.00
40,000.00
40,000.00
20,000.00
20,000.00
33,430.00
33,430.00
2451.501
Structure Excavation Class U (P)
LF
2136
8.00
17,088.00
13.00
27,768.00
11.00
23,496.00
10.57
22,577.52
0401.501
Synthetic Liner (P)
SF
109,500
.94
102,930.00
.82
89,790.00
.90
98,550.00
.93
101,835.00
0401.502
Geotextile Fabric (P)
SF
80,500
.15
12,075.00
.10
8,050.00
.15
12,075.00
.11
8,855.00
2411.507
Concrete Closure Structure
EA
2
14,000.00
28,000.00
8,000.00
16,000.00
8,000.00
16,000.00
18,124.00
36,248.00
2511.505
Hand Placed Riprap
Class
V
CY
480
40.00
19,200.00
45.00
21,600.00
58.00
27,840.00
50.00
24,000.00
2411.507
Concrete Retaining
Wall
(P)
5' -2"
LF
882
112.00
98,784.00
98.00
86,436.00
98.00
86,436.00
99.00
87,318.00
2411.507
Concrete Retaining
Wall
(P)
51 -8"
LF
605
117.00
70,785.00
105.00
63,525.00
105.00
63,525.00
105.00
63,525.00
2411.507
Concrete Retaining
Wall
(P)
61 -2"
LF
104
125.00
13,000.00
113.00 •
11,752.00
113.00
11,752.00
116.00
12,064.00
2411.507
Concrete Retaining
Wall
(P)
6' -5"
LF
37
128.00
4,736.00
116.00
4,292.00
116.00
4,292.00
119.00
4,403.00
2411.507
Concrete Retaining
Wall
(P)
6' -811
LF
159
130.00
20,670.00
120.00
19,080.00.
120.00
19,080.00
123.00
19,557.00
2411.507
Concrete Retaining
Wall
(P)
7' -21,
LF
4
139.00
556.00
127.00
508.00
127.00
508.00
132.00
528.00
2411.507
Concrete Retaining
Wall
(P)
71 -8"
LF
302
143.00
43,186.00
136.00
41,072.b0
136.00
41,072.00•
139.00
41,978.00
2105.533
Salvaged Aggregate
Cover
(P)
CY
3,772
4.00
15,088.00
5.00
18,860.00
6.80
25,649.60
5.95
22,443.40
0401.502
Limestone Wall Cap
(P)
LF
531
30.00
15,930.00
45.00
23,895.00
35.00
18,585.00
45.00
23,895.00
2021.501.
Mobilization
LS
1
14,472.00
14,472.00
10,000.00
10,000.00
34,000.00
34,000.00
42,000.00
42,000.00
TOTAL BASE BID PL -1 (HRA)
495,500.00
482,628.00
502,860.60
544,656.92
Deduct for 7/1/90 Completion Date
.00
(830.00)
(7,000.00)
(12.000.00)
ALTERNATE BID
495,500.00
481,798.00
495,860.60
NO BID
IMPROVEMENT: PL -1 (HRA) CENTENNIAL LAKES PHASE I - TABULATION OF BIDS
LAKE CONSTRUCTION __________________•
ITEM NO.
ITEM
C.S. MCCROSSAN CONSTR.
U.P. TOTAL
28,300.00
28,300.00
UNIT
QUANTITY
ENGINEERS
U.P.
ESTIMATE
TOTAL
DEAN & ASSOCIATES. INC.
U.P. TOTAL
2105.501
Common Excavation
108,405.00
1.42
155,490.00
LS
1
19,000.00.
19,000.00
24,950.00
24,950.00
2451.501
Structure Excavation Class
U (P)
LF
2136
8.00
17,088.00
12.00
25,632.00
0401.501
Synthetic Liner (P)
106,498.15
169.00
SF
109,500
.94
102,930.00
.70917
77,654.12
0401.502
Geotextile Fabric (P)
7,178.00
182.38
SF
80,500
.15
12,075.00
.20
16,100.00
2411.507
Concrete Closure Structure
54,474.76
EA
2
14,000.00
28,000.00
13,210.00
26,420.00
2511.505
Hand Placed Riprap
Class
V
22,000.00
CY
480
40.00
19,200.00
75.00
36,000.00
2411.507
Concrete Retaining
Wall
(P)
P-211
LF
882
112.00
98,784.00
116.40
102,664.80
2411.507
Concrete Retaining
Wall
(P)
51 -8"
LF
605
117.00
70,785.00
127.70
77,258.50
2411.507
Concrete Retaining
Wall
(P)
61 -2"
LF
104
125.00
13,000.00
139.00
14,456.00
2411.507
Concrete Retaining
Wall
(P)
61-5"
LF
37
128.00
4,736.00
150.30
5,561.10
2411.507
Concrete Retaining
Wall
(P)
6' -8"
LF
159
130.00
20,670.00
161.60
25,694.40
2411.507
Concrete Retaining
Wall
(P)
7' -2"
LF
4
139.00
556.00
400.00
1,600.00
2411.507
Concrete Retaining
Wall
(P)
71 -8"
LF
302
143.00
43,186.00
184.26
55,646.52
2105.533
Salvaged Aggregate
Cover
(P)
CY
3,772
4.00
15,088.00
9.12
34,400.64
0401.502
Limestone Wall Cap
(P)
LF
531
30.00
15,930.00
55.00
29,205.00
2021.501
Mobilization
LS
1
14,472.00
14,472.00
75,000.00
75,000.00
TOTAL BASE BID PL -1 (HRA) 495,500.00 628,243.08
Deduct for 7/1/90 Completion Date .00 (27,890.96)
ALTERNATE BID 495,500.00 600,352.12
10,
PAGE 2 OF 2
BID OPENING AUGUST 4, 1989
GEORGE F.
U.P.
COOK CONSTR.
TOTAL
C.S. MCCROSSAN CONSTR.
U.P. TOTAL
28,300.00
28,300.00
45,000.00
45,000.00
14.04
29,989.44
6.00
12,816.00
.99
108,405.00
1.42
155,490.00
.23
18,515.00
.24
19,320.00
13,300.00
26,600.00
25,000.00
50,000.00
100.42
48,201.60
80.00
38,400.00
157.26
138,703.32
155.00
136,710.00
176.03
106,498.15
169.00
102,245.00
145.19
15,099.76
185.00
19,240.00
227.03
8,400.11
194.00
7,178.00
182.38
28,998.42
200.00
31,800.00
181.00
724.00
215.00
860.00
180.38
54,474.76
230.00
69,460.00
10.37
39,115.64
6.00
22,632.00
65.54
34,801.74
50.00
26,550.00
22,000.00
22,000.00
120,000.00
120,000.00
708,826.94 857,701.00
(100,000.00) 110,000.00)
608,826.94 847,701.00
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: HRA
FROM: GORDON L. HUGHES
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT:_ REQUEST FOR-PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5000
DATE. AUGUST 7, 1989 AGENDA ITEM III.B.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESIDENTIAL AMENITIES - PHASES 1, 2,, 3).
Company CENTENNIAL LAKES CONDOMINIUMS Amount of Quote or Bld
1. MONETTE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 1. $ 99,329
2. C. R. BRAZIER 2. 105,915
3. LAKELAND NURSERY 3. 114,568
4. 4
5. 5.
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $96,050
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
MONETTE CONSTRUCTION
GENERAL INFORMATION:
RESIDENTIAL AMENITIES FOR CENTENNIAL LAKES CONDOMINIUMS -
PHASE 1, 2, 3
The Recommended bid is —
within budget nc
P R O C L A M A T I O N
CONSTITUTION WEEK
WHEREAS, our Founding Fathers, in order to secure the blessings of
liberty for themselves and their posterity, did ordain and establish
a Constitution for the United States of America; and
WHEREAS, it is of the greatest import that all citizens fully under-
stand the provisions and principles contained in the Constitution in
order to support it, preserve it and defend it against encroachment;
and
WHEREAS, the two hundred second anniversary of the signing of the
Constitution provides an historic opportunity for all Americans to
learn about and recall achievements of our Founders, and to reflect on
the rights and privileges of citizenship, as well as its attendant
responsibilities; and
WHEREAS, the independence guaranteed to the American people by the
Constitution should be celebrated by appropriate ceremonies and acti-
vities during Constitution Week, September 17 through 23, as designa-
ted by proclamation.of the President of the United States of America
in accordance with Public Law 915;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Frederick S. Richards, Mayor of the City of Edina,
do hereby proclaim the week of September 17 through..23 as..
CONSTITUTION WEEK
in the .City of Edina, and urge all our citizens to pay special atten-
tion during that week to our Federal Constitution and the advantage
of American Citizenship.
ADOPTED this
r0j)
S�
Frederick S. Richards
Mayor
v�ttR!
T O y r
O
Vol a . +• J �
C,�N RCJO"
MARIA SANFORD CHAPTER
The Honorable Frederick S. Richards
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th St.:
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mayor Richards:
As Regent of Maria Sanford Chapter, DAR, I
would very much appreciate it if you would
issue the attached Constitution Week Proclama-
tion at the Council Meeting of August 7,
1989.
With your consent, I will ask that it also be
published in the Sun Current the week of
September 10.
Thank you very much for any assistance you
can give me in this matter.
Sincerely,
Mrs. Howard M. Norback
5501 Dewey Hill Rd ;.
Edina, MN 55435
DES,
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
JUNE 19, 1989
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members, Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and
Richards.
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION ADOPTED FOR ALISON FUHR Motion of Member Kelly was
seconded by Member Smith for adoption of.the following resolution:
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION
WHEREAS, Alison Fuhr has demonstrated her concern and commitment to the City of
Edina through her involvement in many civic organizations, and
WHEREAS she has represented Edina on the Regional Transit Board for the past four
years, and
WHEREAS for the prior one and a half years she represented Edina on the
Metropolitan Transit Commission;
WHEREAS she continues to serve on the Traffic Safety Committee and is a member of
the Edina Citizens Safety Council, and
WHEREAS her achievements have made this City a better place in which to live;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that I, Frederick S. Richards, Mayor of the City of
Edina, join with the members of the Council and all the citizens of Edina in
expressing our sincere appreciation to:
ALISON FUHR
for her unselfish and dedicated service to the City and to its citizens.
Adopted this 19th day of June, 1989. Resolution was adopted unanimously.'
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by
Member Rice to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented with the
exception of the removal of item VI.E. - Mavelle Drive - 24' Easement.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 1. 1989 APPROVED. Motion was made by
Member Smith and was seconded by Member Paulus to approve the Council Minutes of
the Regular Meeting of May 1, 1989.
-- Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*CORRECTION TO PLAT OF WHITE OAKS 2ND ADDITION APPROVED Motion of Member Kelly
was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLUTION APPROVING CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
TO 'PLAT OF WHITE OAKS 2ND ADDITION
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 505.175 Laws of Minnesota, 1957,
Ronald L. Krueger, Registered Land Surveyor No. 14374, State of Minnesota, has
certified:
1. That the plat of White Oaks 2nd Addition dated May 2, 1938 and filed on May
26, 1938 was prepared by a Registered Land Surveyor who is now unavailable.
2' That said plat contains errors, omissions, or defects in the following
particulars, to -wit: The Northeast line of Lot 9 shows a dimension of 107.2, but
field measures 97.2 as shown on the adjacent plat of Lot 1, White Oaks 3rd
Addition.
3. That said plat is hereby corrected in the following particulars, to -wit:
Change the distance on the Northeast line of said Lot 9 from 107.2 to 97.2.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina-,
Minnesota, that it hereby approves the Certificate of Correction, dated April 11,
1989, prepared by Ronald L. Krueger, Registered Land Surveyor No. 14374, State of
Minnesota, as presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of June 19,
1989.
Resolution adopted on rollcall vote, five ayes.
BIDS AWARDED FOR INSURANCE RENEWALS Ceil Smith, Assistant to the City Manager,
presented insurance quotations for the City's insurance renewals as follows:
Property Insurance: Policy
Zurich
Hartford
Northbrook
Jim Fee, agent with Frank B.
carried the City's insurance
established with Hartford a
award of Property Insurance
Period 7/1/89 - 7/1/90
$ 41,268
$ 43,083
$ 61,800
Hall Insurance Co., pointed out that Hartford has
for the past 4 years; that a relationship has been
nd with the enhancements provided staff would recommend
renewal to the Hartford Insurance Company.
Motion was made by Member Smith to award the Property Insurance bid to the
Hartford Insurance Company at $43,083.00. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
General /Liquor Liability, Auto Liability and Workers' Compensation Insurance:
Ceil Smith indicated that only two quotations had been received:
League of MN Cities (LMC) $574,774
Home Insurance $611,760
Staff would recommend award of bid to Home Insurance because of the retrospective
rating of the losses for the LMC Workers' Compensation and for all coverages
offered by Home. The premium cannot be determined until 6 months after the
policies expire. Bill Homeyer, Harris- Homeyer Agency, explained the payment
scheduling with Home Insurance as follows: deposit premium of $45,000 on 7/1/89,
nine payments of $35,000 with a balloon payment of $250,000 on 5/1/90 with no
interest fee charged. John Wallin, Director of Finance, noted that within the
eleven month period, $21,000 in interest could be earned on this payment schedule.
After some discussion, motion was made by Member Smith to award the bid for
General Liability, Workers' Compensation and Automobile insurance to Home
Insurance Company. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMI1TEE MINUTES OF JUNE 13, 1989 APPROVED. Member Smith moved
approval of the'following recommended action listed in Section A of the Traffic
Safety Committee Minutes of June 13, 1989:
1) That a 3 -way "STOP" sign be installed at the intersection of St. John's Avenue
and Golf Terrace and also to install advisory 25 mph pedestrian area signs at the
east and west entrance to Golf Terrace with additional signs in the area of the
bus stop;
2) That "NO PARKING SCHOOL DAYS, 7:00 A.M. - 3:30 P.M." signs be installed at the
5700 and 5800 blocks of W. 68 St.;
3) That "NO PARKING" signs be installed in front of the residence at 4622
Edgebrook Place, based on approval by the resident at this address;
and to acknowledge Sections B and C of the Minutes. Motion for approval was
seconded by Member Kelly.
Ayes: Kelly,.Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
PROPOSAL FOR THE SECOND CENTURY PROJECT PRESENTED AND APPROVED Leslie Turner and
George Hite presented their proposal for The Second Century Project which will be
an open, comprehensive program to identify and explore policy alternatives
affecting Edina as it approaches the 21st Century. The proposed Steering
Committee is as follows: Jim Colville, Andrew Herring, Joanne Kelly, Larry
Laukka, Hazel Reinhardt and Lynne Westphal. It is the intent of the Committee to
enlist anyone in the community who would like to participate and who can
contribute. The initial Committee meeting will be held June 20, 1989. The intent
of the Committee is not to be so visionary that it has no practical value. The
effort of this committee will be focused over the horizon, to see things that are
not readily apparent today but that will influence this community and the kinds of
policy decisions that will have to be made. It will be a combination of vision
and practicality with broad participation. Scheduling would be to begin work in
the fall of 1989 and to return to Council by the fall of 1990 with the report.
Notion was made by Mayor Richards to accept the report on the proposal for The
Second Century Project, and to establish the Edina City Council's Special
Commission on Future Issues and Policies with the Steering Committee to be
comprised of the individuals named, to be chaired by Leslie Turner and George
Hite. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Member Paulus asked that the
candidates who had applied for the vacant Council seat in January and had
expressed interest in the project be included. Mayor Richards said he that those
names have been turned over to the co- chairs who have indicated that they would
contact those that had expressed a desire to participate.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion Carried.
Mayor Richards suggested that the next Agenda item to be heard would be VI.F -
Update - White Oaks Lots.
UPDATE - LOT 9 WHITE OAKS 2ND ADDITION: FINDINGS TO BE DRAFTED Engineer Fran
Hoffman recalled that Andron Development Corporation had applied for a building
permit to construct a single family home on Lot 1, White Oaks 3rd Addition and Lot
9, White Oaks 2nd Addition as was reported to the Council on May 1, 1989. The:
building site on Lot 9 is a low area and staff had requested additional
information from the developer regarding how the stormwater drainage would be
handled. The developer and his engineer have identified four alternatives:
A) No build
B) Temporary pumping
C) Enlarge the holding area
D) Permanent pump and forcemain system.
Engineer Hoffman indicated that Alternative A is not feasible from the owner's
viewpoint and has been rejected.by the builder. With Alternative B the developer
has proposed giving the City some money with which to the pump stormwater from the
low area when needed. Under Alternative C the developer would enlarge the holding
area to provide enough additional stormwater storage on site to equal the amount
of existing pond storage lost by the house construction. This alternative is
supported by the developer. Engineer Hoffman said that Alternative D is preferred
by staff and would be construction of a permanent stormwater lift station system
that would be able to pump down the pond during periods of flooding. It would
provide the least long term risk to the future property owner's building, the
adjacent streets and backyard vegetation of adjoining neighbors. The forcemain
would discharge into the nearest storm sewer, e.g. Arden Avenue /Bridge Lane. The
intent would be that if water rose in the pond area it could be pumped down within
a few days. This would also protect the vegetation that would be hurt by long
standing water. The estimated construction cost of this system would be
approximately $33,000.
In'summary, Engineer Hoffman advised that the developer is willing to provide
either the temporary pump system (Alternative B) or additional ponding capacity
(Alternative C) (estimated at $8,000) to mitigate the effects of future flooding.
Concerning Alternative D the developer would be willing to pay $8,000 towards the
cost of the permanent pump /forcemain system which would leave approximately
$25,000 of the cost not funded. Engineer Hoffman stated that at this point staff
believes that the requirements of an engineering review could be satisfied subject
to final details being submitted to the City. The issue before the Council from a
staff perspective is where should staff be on requesting and requiring the final
plan if indeed a building permit is to be issued at this time. The Building
Department has reviewed the building code and believes, if the issue of the
stormwater drainage is resolved and additional information is submitted on
waterproofing and hydrostatic pressure caused by high water, that a permit could
be issued for the site. He concluded by advising that staff has met with Connor
Schmid and Fred Hoisington who represent the neighbors to keep them abreast of the
situation. He also noted a letter dated June'15, 1989 addressed to the Council
from Dr. and Mrs. Ensor Transfeldt,'4700 Townes Road, in which they stated their
concerns about the proposed development.
Mayor Richards asked for restatement of engineering staff's position that, if.
the developer responded to the issue of surface water drainage by submitting plans
that would indicate construction of Alternative D (permanent pump /forcemain), the
permit could be issued. Engineer Hoffman responded that if the developer stated
they were going to build and pay for Alternative D, staff would say that is the
best alternative of the four proposals. Mayor Richards asked if a building permit
would be issued if the developer came forth with Alternative C. Engineer Hoffman
stated that staff would have a difficult time in not issuing a permit but would be
concerned about the long term effect if there were several consecutive wet years
with no pump.
Mayor Richards asked the City Attorney if the Council would'have the right to
adopt a position relative to Alternative C that staff, presumably, would then
follow. Attorney Erickson restated the question, i.e., could the Council direct
staff to not issue a permit if the developer wanted to do anything other than
Alternative D. He said that the general rule for stormwater is that it is a
common enemy. The person who suffers from it can get rid of it by any means that
is reaonable and that does not do unreasonable harm to other people. Mayor
Richards asked if this was a factual determination and that the Council then might
determine that it is not reasonable to handle the stormwater in that way, i.e.
alternate C. Attorney Erickson stated that it is a question of whether it is
reasonable or not. Mayor Richards questioned if it would be safe to come to a
conclusion that it is not reasonable to handle it in that fashion. Attorney
Erickson responded that he did not know if there are enough facts to present the
question of whether it is reasonable or not at this meeting; that staff would want
to elaborate on the facts and have further testimony for the Council before a
decision would be made.
Mayor Richards asked Engineer Hoffman as to why the City should pick up any cost,
assuming the developer goes forward with Alternative D, to provide any type of
public improvement to handle the stormwater drainage of the site. Engineer
Hoffman said there are two arguments from a developer's point of view: (1) That
the subject site is only part of the 18 acre drainage area to the pond and
therefore should only bear a part of the cost, and 2) That because this is the
last property to be developed, the developer should not be required to solve the
problem.
Member Paulus asked if Alternative C would be a possibility. Engineer Hoffman
explained that one could complete a lowering of that area sufficient to handle the
filled area. The concern would be that a situation could develop with no outlet
out of the holding area and with a high water level that the City would be forced
to go out and pump to protect the nearby properties. Member Paulus asked, if
Alternative C were adopted and there was future flooding, could the City be liable
for damage to surrounding properties because it allowed this property to be built
on. Attorney Erickson stated that he did not believe the City would be liable.
Generally, the building codes impose what the courts call a public duty and
liability would be imposed only if there was a private duty between the City and
the individual. In this case, the matter has been studied and reasonable attempts
have been made t9 mitigate the damages and water flow that may occur.
Member Smith asked, if the City agrees to go with Alternative C, would Andron be
willing to give the City the $8,000 in case we had to build something. Engineer
Hoffman explained that Andron's position is that he would spend the $8,000 on
constructing Alternative C; if the City requests Alternative D he would give that
money to the City towards the cost of that project.
Member Rice questioned whether the City's engineers agreed with the drainage
report prepared by Ron Krueger & Associates for Andron. Engineer Hoffman said
that from the point of view of what the flood levels might be that, basically,
they agreed that there are the four alternatives that have been presented.
Connor Schmid, 4711 Meadow Road, said that Fred Hoisington, Planning Consultant,
had been retained by the White.Oaks Homeowners Association to look at the proposed
development and would speak on behalf of the Association. He then introduced
Catherine Ecklund, 520 Lake Street, Wayzata, MN, the widow of Frank J. Ecklund,
and a co- developer of the White Oaks area in 1937. Mrs. Ecklund presented the
history of the development of the forty -acre White Oaks area and pointed out the
obstacles they had to overcome in the process. The lots sold very quickly and
were developed with the exception of the pond area which was reserved for natural
drainage. The pond area had been offered to the Village of Edina on several
occasions but the Council had declined because of the maintenance costs and
potential liability. When the Ecklunds moved from the White Oaks area,
Mr. Ecklund deeded the pond area to Dr. Lawrence Larson with the agreement that it
was to be kept as a wildlife refuge and bird sanctuary. In conclusion, Mrs.
Ecklund said that the residents of White oaks have a fondness for the area and
want to keep it natural. She said she hoped that the Council would consider
keeping this area in its natural environment rather than letting it be developed.
Fred Hoisington, representing the White Oaks Homeowners Association, spoke of the
importance of preserving wetlands, noting that the wetland on the subject property
is a Type 7, e.g. forested wetland. He showed a graphic depicting the bottom of
the pond at 867 feet and pointed out that the 100 -year flood elevation is at
872 -874. He mentioned that an unstable soil problem also exists; that the site
itself drains 17 acres and that the pond has six inlets and 'no outlet. An
important function of a wetland with no outlet is as a recharge basin wherein the
water seeps through the bottom very effectively. He said that the pond's
integrity as a recharge basin should be preserved.
In reference to the proposed house, Mr. Hoisington noted that the basement floor
slab would be one foot above the pond bottom and 4. to 6 feet below the 100 -year
flood elevation. It would require 11 -12 feet of excavation or piling. The soil
engineers that have worked on this project have indicated that it would be
excavated rather than piled. It would have to have a drain tile system and a
reinforced basement floor because of the hydrostatic pressure and the basement
level would have to be waterproofed. A sewage lift station would be required (not
unusual) and a stormwater lift station as well, or in lieu thereof, excavation to
store stormwater on the site.
Mr. Hoisington stated that, in addition to the 10- 12,000 square feet that would be
disrupted by the house itself and the filling, that footage would be duplicated by
the excavation that would be required to handle the water storage that would not
be pumped away from the site. The disruption would be even more than that if
everything is hauled and none is stored on the site. Half of the existing values
on the site would be lost. It would destroy the vegetation, the wildlife, and the
woodland continuity. It would reduce the needed flood storage capacity of that
basin and would isolate the adjacent wetland that is owned by the Transfeldts.• It
would create a mechanical dependency to shape nature if it is built with a pumping
system. There should be concern about the risk that the future owner(s) would be
at because of the water problems that would exist with a basement that is below
the 100 -year flood level. There will be an enormous monetary cost that will
ultimately be passed through to the owner of the house.
In conclusion, Mr. Hoisington said that development was never intended for this
site. The development as proposed defies all planning and engineering principles.
He said that every agency they have checked with agrees. The environment loses,
the neighborhood loses, the City loses, the ultimate owner loses and maybe if
enough costs can be passed along, the developer will be a winner. He made the
following recommendations: 1) that the City not participate in costs to build a
lift station to pump for one house, 2) that the City not permit dredging, 3) that
the Building Department be authorized to deny a building permit, 4) that this
wetland be treated as any other wetland in the City, and 5) that the City consider
acquisition of the property by condemnation.
Connor Schmid made reference to a letter dated June 15, 1989 addressed to the
Edina City Council from Dr. & Mrs. Ensor Transfeldt, 4700 Townes Road, concerning
the setback for the proposed house and the stormwater problem. He also presented
a letter addressed to the Council from David Shank and Suzyn Ware, 4081 Sunnyside
Road, which related their dealings with Mr. Andron concerning the subject property
and their present home which was built by Mr. Andron. The letter also referred to
the two alternatives proposed by the developer to handle the problem of excess
water that would be created by filling in Lot 9. They felt that either
alternative would result in destruction of the natural habitat of the marsh.
Their letter stated that, if the City accepts the proposal made by the developer
to pay one - fourth the cost of the pumping station, they would possibly seek a
class action suit to prevent the City from assessing other property owners in the
Country Club/White Oakes area for the benefit of this one property owner.
Mr. Schmid mentioned that Mr. Andron acknowledged at one point being advised of
the history of this property, e.g. the dedication of it for a park and that
intent, and the negative impact that the Association felt it would have. Mr.
Andron had looked at it and had said to a group of the neighbors that it should .
not be built on. Since then Mr. Andron has changed his mind. Mr. Schmid said
there is some unusal timing of subsequent events that might impact on the question
of real market value property.
Mr. Schmid observed that the neighborhood and-the White Oaks Homeowners
Association has twice met goals set by the City concerning acquisition. If the
City can-arrive, through the condemnation process or through some other
investigation, at the real value of this property the Association and the
neighbors would come forth to participate on a reasonable basis with the Council.
He said he hoped that, having heard the people who have known and loved this area
for nearly fifty years and the people living there now who are concerned,
something can be done by the Council to serve the public purposes of ponding and
open space that has been in existence for 50 years.
Member Rice questioned the City Planner about the front yard setback alluded to in
the Transfelts' letter. Planner Larsen explained how the front yard set -back in a
residential area is determined where more than 25% of the frontage of that street
is developed. The Ordinance gives two choices: 1) when developing a lot where
there is a home only on one side, the setback of the new building can be that of
the existing building (in this case 60 feet), or 2) an average setback of all
homes fronting on that side of the street between intersections can be used. In
staff's view the development side of the street is uninterrupted, even with a
curve in the street, between Bridge Lane and Sunnyside Road. No set -backs on the
easterly side of Townes Road would be included in that review. In this case 4600,
4700, 4702, 4704 and 4708 Townes Road were included,.with the average setback
being 51.4 feet. Member Rice asked the purpose of the front yard setback
requirement. Planner Larsen stated that it is to maintain a certain continuity
and flow of the houses along a street.
Mayor Richards opened up discussion on the proposed development on Lot 9, White
Oaks 2nd Addition. To put it in perspective, he said that there has been talk
about condemnation, open space, etc. This Council has never talked about the
issue of condemning this property. The Council has had extensive discussions,
which Mr. Andron did not participate in, about the possibility of the City, in
conjunction with the residents in the area, acquiring that property. Actual
negotiations with the property owner were never begun. Through the years various
groups and committees from the City have looked at the issue of park, open space
and wetland and what the City should acquire that it felt should be held in public
domain. The response has been that the subject property has not been considered
for public ownership. At this time the Council is confronted with consideration
of two issues: 1) Initiate condemnation proceedings, and /or (2) Direct staff to
not issue a building permit.
Attorney Erickson said that, if it is the consensus of the Council to make a
directive to the staff, he would recommend that a process be followed similar to
that used for zoning and subdivision; namely., to direct the staff to.study the
testimony, review the facts brought forward and prepare findings, decision and
reasons for the Council to consider in making a decision at a future meeting.
Mayor Richards commented that he did not feel there is any need to discuss
condemnation of the property. He stated that he did not think the case has been
made that there is a right to develop the property. There is uncertainty,
ambiguity and doubt as to whether or not the proposals are adequate to handle the
surface water on the property. He said he felt that it would be appropriate for
the Council to conclude, subject to review of specific facts and findings, that a
permit should not be issued.
Member Paulus inquired whether this.was a portion of a larger piece of property
that was subdivided several years ago. Planner Larsen explained that the lot in
question has been platted since 1938. She commented that since the early 1980's
homes are being built on sites that at one time were considered unbuildable and
after five years we are seeing structural problems and litigation procedures.
Member Paulus said she was not sure of the City's responsibility legally but that
the City should try to foresee such problems for future owners of those types of
properties. She said there have been issues raised here that point to potential
problems for this property in the future. Further, this development would be
disrupting land that has not been tampered with since_ 1938. She regreted that
this situation has gone on as long as it had because of the cost factor for the
residents of White Oaks and for the people proposing to build on this property.
Member Rice stated that he strongly supported the Mayor's comments. He said the
City probably should have taken this property years ago. When the City considered
acquiring open space by referendum some 10 -12 years ago they looked hard for
properties in that area. It was assumed that this was a wetland. He said that
for the reasons stated he did not think it was an appropriate site for building.
Motion was made by Member Smith with a second by Member Kelly to direct staff to
prepare findings and reasons in support of denial of a building permit for Lot 9,
White Oaks 2nd Addition to be brought back by July 24, 1989, if possible.
Mayor Richards then asked the proponent to speak to any issue that he wished to
address. Richard Andron stated that he is the developer of the subject site. He
clarified that when he originally purchased the property the Lot 1 portion of the
parcel was clearly covered by a drainage easement and the Lot 9 portion was not.
The fact that there were two lots there instead of just one, told him as a
registered architect and experienced land planner, that there would be no reason
to subdivide the property unless it was meant to be a buildable lot. The fact
that only Lot 1 was covered by an easement and Lot 9 was not meant that someone
had concluded that it was sufficient area for natural surface drainage. When he
proceeded with design proposals, he met with members of the neighborhood group to
listen to their concerns. He said he also had concerns about developing sensitive
sites and that definitely this was a sensitive site.
Mr. Andron explained that the property.was for sale for close to two years before
he had any inkling or concrete offer from the City and the neighborhood that they
were considering purchasing the property to keep it undeveloped. Had the
neighborhood made some kind of offer during that period he said he would have
considered it. When the offer finally was made by the City Mr. Andron said he had
already sold, closed and passed the deed on to his client who had purchased the
property for the purposes of building a new house.
Mr. Andron stated that he has made a responsible and diligent effort to address
the engineering issues raised concerning the proposed development. The site will
be 8% filled with 92% of the site not filled. He submitted that to deny a
building permit after the fact of passing deed when the property was openly
available for such a long period of time is putting undue duress on himself and
his client. Mr. Andron commented that during previous discussions that have been
held between . the neighborhood and the Council he was not present because he was
not informed that they were taking place.
In response to questions of Mayor Richards, Mr. Andron made the following
comments. He first became involved with the subject property about 2 1/2 years
ago and had verbally ran it by the Planning Department from a legal point of view.
The Planner had indicated that if it were deemed to be buildable by the Building.
and Engineering Departments there would be no other reason why it would not be
buildable. Mr. Andron said he was referred to the Engineering and Building
Departments concerning drainage from the property. At that time he had his civil
engineering consultant do an evaluation of the drainage capacity of that area who
found it to be more than adequate. As to awareness of difficulties and water
problems and buildability, Mr. Andron said that he had the clear impression that
if there was adequate drainage capacity on the site, from an engineering point of
view, that a permit would be issued. He said he would not have proceeded if he
had not been under that impression and that he had continued to have that
impression until tonite. Regarding discussions by the Council that involved him
or the previous owner, Mr. Andron stated that he was not aware of any prior to
about 8 -10 weeks ago.
Member Paulus asked Mr. Andron if he still held a valid purchase agreement with
the same client on the property. Mr. Andron stated that the deed had passed into
their hands and that they own the property. Member Paulus inquired whether Mr.
Andron had a purchase agreement with them to build on this property, or had they
withdrawn building this proposed project. Mr. Andron said that at this time the
building agreement is still valid. Member Paulus asked if the clients have
concerns about whether this can be a successful project considering the cost
factors. Mr. Andron said they are totally aware of the engineering and building
issues that have to be addressed in building that close to the water table.
Member Paulus said that her utmost concern was whether there is really the
technology to prove and guarantee that a. successful building can be put up that
will not have problems.in the future.
Sharon Andresen, 4804 Maple Road, said that she has lived in the White Oaks area
since 1972 and that her concern is the pump system proposed under Alternative D
whereby the stormwater would be discharged to the storm sewer at Arden and Bridge.
She said that during the July 1987 storm all the water from Arden was not drained
properly and came over on Maple Road and flooded all the homes. She asked where
this water would go and said that they need the lowland for drainage.
Engineer Hoffman stated that the July 1987 rainstorm far exceeded any of the
City's design criteria used for stormwater piping systems. There was massive
flooding everywhere - the City's pipes cannot hold that type of flow. The
proposed Alternative D would be a very small system and would take a period of
three days to pump the water down. Its impact would be very small on an intense
rainstorm and would be a delayed pumping system that would eventually drain that
area down if the site is built upon.
William Laird, 4615 Townes Circle, suggested that when this comes before the
Council,again that a topographical map be used.
Michael Feldman, 4083 Sunnyside Road, referred to the letter of David Shank and .
Suzyn Ware, his neighbors at 4081 Sunnyside Road. He said they would corroborate
that as early as February, 1987 the issues about the difficulties of this site
were known.
Mayor Richards then called the motion on the floor.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith,'Richards
Motion carried.
Mayor Richards said that the proposed findings would be submitted by staff to
Connor Schmid who would make them available for review by the neighbors. The
findings would also be sent to Mr.'Andron for his review and comment.
UPDATE PRESENTED ON 50TH & FRANCE BUSINESS DISTRICT RENOVATION PROJECT (89 -9)
Engineer Hoffman gave an update.on the 50th & France Business District Renovation
Project (89 -9). Staff has surveyed the business area and it was clear that the
retailers are concerned about business disruption again this year. The survey
results would indicate that a project starting in August with completion in
mid -1990 would effectively deal with their concerns.
Engineer Hoffman said-that a test section of sidewalk behind the theatre would be
poured and tested over the fall /winter and spring of next year. The test panels
would be exposed aggregate, paver band /exposed aggregate, integrally colored
concrete and paver panels. A final survey will be taken of the 50th & France
merchants on the samples regarding design as well as durability. Following the
survey, staff would propose that the project be bid with award of contract to
start the work in late summer. A second and third contract would be let on later
dates to renovate the specialty items such as trash containers, kiosks, bell tower
and canopies. Engineer Hoffman answered questions about the products from Members
Smith and Paulus. Mayor Richards asked Gail Korst, President of the 50th & France
Business Association, whether she had comments. Ms. Korst said that they want to
make sure that what is used will last and would defer to the Engineering
Department for their expertise regarding the product. No formal action was taken.
50TH STREET CLOSING NOT APPROVED: GUIDELINES ON STREET CLOSING DEVELOPED Craig
Larsen, City Planner, stated that at the last Council meeting staff had presented
the request of the 50th & France Merchants Association to close off West 50th
Street for a promotion. At the City Manager's direction, a meeting was held with
Engineer Fran Hoffman, Police Chief Craig Swanson and Captain Len Kleven to review
this proposal and also how to deal with such requests citywide. The only regular
event within the City.for which streets are closed temporarily is the block party.
This is a normal event happening citywide with a number of requirements that must
be met.
The group developed guidelines to review street closings requests based on the
following:- Does the City have control over the street, do we have the authority
to close it? What is the classification of the street? Is there a
non - residential diverter street available for that time? Is there a public
benefit to the closing? What period of time would the street be closed? Staff
decided, on the public benefit issue, this was a private promotion and thought it.
would set an undesirable precedent based on other commercial areas. The
LE
recommendation was to not permit West 50th Street to be closed at the 50th and
France Business District for Crazy Days as requested.
Mayor Richards inquired whether this information was set forth in the memorandum
that the Council had. Planner Larsen said that it was. Mayor Richards asked
whether the 50th & France Merchants Association knew of this. Planner Larsen said
he did not know if a formal answer had been given. Mayor Richards asked Gail
Korst if an answer must be given immediately. Ms. Korst said that she understood
how it was considered a private benefit but said the merchants were hoping to make
it into a public event sponsoring, for instance, a Kiddie Parade. Member Kelly
stated that she felt a decision should be made tonight.
Notion was made by Member Rice to approve the staff recommendation not to allow
Vest 50th street to be closed on Saturday, July 29 for the 50th & France Business
District Crazy Days.- Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Member Paulus asked,
from a public safety point of view, if this event would be as busy as the Art.
Fair. Ms. Korst said she would hope that it would be but that it probably would
not be. May Richards suggested that the guideline information should be given
to the business community at 50th and France so that if they wanted to take issue
with it they would have a forum to'do so.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith
Nays: Richards
Motion carried.
APPROVAL OF 24' EASEMENT - MAVELLE DRIVE VACATION CONTINUED TO 7/10/89 Member
Smith explained that he had asked to have this pulled from the consent agenda
because he had questions about the bright red sign on the back of the Room and
Board building facing the apartments. The sign may be a conforming sign but is
bright, is on longer hours, etc. He asked if this could be checked. Planner
Larsen responded that the sign does comply with the City ordinance and that staff„
received no complaints. Mayor Richards asked for a motion to continue this to
July 10, 1989, to have a response from the property owner.
Motion was made by Member Smith to continue approval of the 24' easement for the
Navelle Drive vacation to July 10, 1989, to give staff time to check on the sign
and to obtain a response from the property owner. Motion was seconded by Member
Rice.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
EDINA HISTORICAL SOCIETY BUILDING EXPANSION APPROVED Robert Kojetin, Director of
the Parks and Recreation, presented the plan for the proposed expansion of the
Edina Historical Society Building at Arneson Acres. He introduced Joel Stromberg,
Miller - Dunwiddie Architects, as the architect for the project. Using color
overheads, Director Kojetin showed the features of the proposed two -level
expansion. Many of the artifacts from the Wooddale School building will be
incorporated in the addition, e.g. doors, gym flooring, plaster relief molding,
stairway railings, auditorium seats, pair of front door coach lamps, etc.
Director Kojetin stated that the plans have been presented to and reviewed by the
Park Board and the Edina Historical Society. The Society has appointed Jim
Fenalson, President, to sit through the design phase together with Foster
Dunwiddie and Marilyn Curtis from the Society.
Timetable for construction of the expansion is proposed as follows:.
June 28 Advertise for Bids
July 20 Bid Opening - 2 p.m.
August 7 Award of Bid by Council
August 13 Ground Breaking Ceremony
Mayor Richards asked how the project is proposed to be, funded. Director Kojetin
explained that what has been proposed to the architect was to keep the cost within
$200,000 for the actual construction of the facility. The Edina Centennial,
Commission has turned over to the City $221,000 for the project as a lasting
memorial. In addition to the construction costs, there is approximately $15,000
in soft costs for architectural fees.
Notion was made by Member Smith to approve the plans for the Edina Historical
Soceity Building expansion as presented and to authorize the advertising for bids
for the project. A second to the motion was given by Member Paulus.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
On behalf of the Edina Historical Society, Mr. Fenalson expressed their thanks and
appreciation for all who have contributed to the project.
BALL FIELD LIGHTING - VAN VALKENBURG PARK - APPROVED - Parks and Recreation
Director Kojetin introduced Bob Christianson,' Park Board Chair and Bill Jenkins,
Park Board Member. Mr. Christianson presented the recommendation of the Park
Board to use approximately $130,000 from the developers' fund for lighting for the
three softball fields at Van Valkenburg Park in the fall of 1989. He said that no
money has been budgeted to finish this facility for at least 3 -5 years which would
mean from start to finish the park would be a 13 -year project. The Park Board
feels it is important to proceed with the completion so that the adult softball
program can be utilized by the residents to its fullest extent. The lighting of
the fields would double the number of games that can be played in an evening. :It
would also enable the facility to be used in the fall for touch football.
Member Kelly said she agreed that the park completed and asked whether any of the
money would repaid to the developer's fund. Mr. Christianson explained that
ultimately there would be funds allocated out of the capitol improvement budget.
That process would not begin for 3 -5 years. In essence there would be a trade -off
- use of developers' funds today and a postponement of capital expenditures in
five years to off -set at least a portion of the $130,000. Member Kelly inquired
about whether the Softball Association would contribute to pay back the funds.
Mr. Christianson stated that the Softball Association is not like the Art Center,
it is not a revenue producing activity. As a practical matter, that has not been
considered.
Member Smith asked how many teams there are and what the percentage is for
participation of Edina residents. Director Kojetin responded that currently there
are 125 adult softball teams in the program; 15 have been turned down. The teams
are made up of residents or individuals who work in the community which is the
basic rule for all adult activities. Residents in the program is approximately
60 -70 %. Member Smith asked about maintenance of the lights. Manager Rosland said
that each softball team will contribute $25 additionally to pay for the operation
of the lights; operating costs will be covered by the City.
Member Rice questioned the apparent priority given to construction of the shelter
building earlier at Van Valkenburg Park and asked how that was funded. Director
Kojetin explained that the basic use is to provide restroom facilities, which is
the biggest problem at all the ballfields. Heating was installed as the building
will be in operation until November when it will be closed for the winter season.
The $132,000 cost for the building came from the capital improvement budget.
Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Paulus to approve the
expenditure of $130,000 from the developers' fund for installation of lighting at
the three softball fields at Van Valkenburg Park in the fall of 1989, as
recommended by the Park Board.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus,. Richards
Nay: Rice, Smith
Motion carried.
BUDGET HEARING DATES CONFIRMED - Mayor Richards stated that the 1989 Budget
Hearings have been scheduled for August 8, 10, and 15. Following discussion the
Council confirmed the August 8 and 10 dates, leaving open any further date to see
if needed.
*ON -SALE WINE LICENSE RENEWALS APPROVED - Motion was made by Member Kelly and was
seconded by Member Rice to approve the On -Sale Wine License Renewals, for the
period 7/1/89 - 6/30/90, for the following restaurants: Empress Restaurant,
Dayton's Boundary Waters Restaurant, Vie de France Restaurant, The Good Earth,
Szechuan Star; and for conditional approval: Original Pancake House/My Pie, and
The Pantry, as recommended by the Police Department.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes
1989 WORK PROGRAM - Assistant Manager Gordon Hughes recalled that the Council had
reviewed the 1989 Work Program at the last meeting and had suggested some changes.
In accordance with Council's direction for Issue #4, the short term objective and
work program has been amplified.
Motion was made by Member Kelly with a second to the motion by Member Paulus to
accept the 1989 Work Program as presented. Member Paulus suggested that copies of
the 1989 Work Program be sent to all Board and Commission members. The suggestion
was unanimously approved.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
DRAFT PLASTICS BAN ORDINANCE PRESENTED: HEARING DATE SET FOR 7110/89 - Assistant
Manager Gordon Hughes presented a draft ordinance relating to the prohibition of
pastic packaging. The Ordinance is patterned after ordinances which have been
adc,pted in other cities. Manager Hughes mentioned that in Sections 4 and 5 it
provides a rather substantial role for the Recycling Commission. Staff would
suggest that suggest that in Section 4 the City Manager, rather than the Recycling
Commission,.should have the duty to enforce the Ordinance. This would be
consistent with other ordinances in the City. In Section 5, staff would
recommendation that the Manager likewise promulgate rules and regulations subject
to the Recycling Commission's input and the Council's adoption. If the Council
wishes to consider the Draft Ordinance it is suggested that a hearing date be set
for July 10, 1989 for first reading. If so desired, staff would arrange for
experts to provide testimony for certain aspects of the Ordinance.
Member Smith suggested that as an alternative to a plastics ban ordinance the
Council consider a draft resolution that would request the Association of
Metropolitan Municipalities and the Metropolitan Council to advocate legislation
that would provide uniform standards and regulations for all cities in the
seven - county metropolitan area relative to the prohibition of plastic packaging.
He said he felt strongly that we cannot do this by ourselves and that this would
be more effective than an ordinance that would pertain to the City of Edina.
Following discussion on the draft ordinance and the proposed resolution, motion
was made by Member Paulus setting July 10, 1989 as the hearing date to consider an
ordinance that would prohibit plastic packaging. Motion was seconded by Member
Rice.
Ayes: Kelly, Rice, Paulus, Richards
Nays: Smith
Motion carried. (See action later in Minutes changing hearing date to 7/24/89.)
LETTER FROM "SUNSHINE GALS GOLF LEAGUE REFERRED TO STAFF AND PARK BOARD Mayor
Richards referred to a letter dated June 6, 1989 from Bernice Schultz, President
of the "Sunshine Gals" golf league asking that the Edina City Council reconsider
its policy to limit membership in Braemar golf leagues to Edina residents only,
effective in 1990. The letter suggested that current members of the league not be
terminated and that the restriction of Edina residency apply only to new members.
Over time, through attrition, the goal of Edina residency would be achieved.
The Council discussed having the present policy reviewed and the possibility of
grandfathering in current golf league members who are not residents. Parks and
Recreation Director Kojetin said that the Park Board and the Braemar Golf
Association were aware of the letter and had discussed it. It was informally
agreed by the Council that the current policy adopted in November of 1987 be,
revisited by the Park Board, Park and Recreation staff, Braemar staff, the Braemar
Golf Association and all the golf leagues concerning the residency requirement.
*HEARING DATE SET - STREET VACATION - EDINBOROUGH WAY Motion was made by Member
Kelly with a second by Member Rice to adopt the.following Resolution:
RESOLUTION CALLING PUBLIC HEARING ON
VACATION OF EASEMENT FOR STREET PURPOSES
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. It is hereby found and determined that the following described easement for
street purposes should be considered for vacation, in accordance with the
provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 412.851 and 160.29:
All that part of EDINBOROUGH WAY, as donated and dedicated by SOUTH EDINA
DEVELOPMENT ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Beginning at the northeast corner of LOT 1, BLOCK 2, said SOUTH EDINA
DEVELOPMENT ADDITION; thence on an assumed bearing of South 00 degrees
14 minutes 09 seconds East, along the easterly line of said LOT 1 for
100.00 feet; thence South 18 degrees 40 minutes 15 seconds East,
continuing along said easterly line for 63.25 feet; thence North 00
degrees 14 minutes 09 seconds West for 159.90 feet to an intersection
with the easterly extension of the northerly line of said LOT 1, thence
North 89 degrees 57 minutes 33 seconds West, along said easterly
extension for 20.00 feet to the point of beginning.
2. This Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the form of notice
included in paragraph 3 hereof for the purpose of holding a public hearing on
whether such vacation shall be made in the interest of the public.
3. The Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and
purpose of said hearing to be published once a week for two weeks, in the Edina
Sun, being the official newspaper of the City, the.first publication at least 14
days prior to the date of such hearing and to post such notice, at least 14 days
prior to the date of such hearing, in at least three (3) public and conspicuous
places within the City, as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851. Such
notice shall be in substantially the following form:
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ON VACATION OF EASEMENT FOR STREET PURPOSES
IN THE CITY OF EDINA
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin
County, Minnesota; will meet at the Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street on
July 24, 1989, at 7:00 p.m., for the purpose of holding a public hearing on the
proposed vacation of the following easement for street purposes:
All that part of EDINBOROUGH WAY, as donated and dedicated by SOUTH EDINA
DEVELOPMENT ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Beginning at the northeast corner of LOT 1, BLOCK 2, said SOUTH EDINA
DEVELOPMENT ADDITION; thence on an assumed bearing of South 00 degrees
14 minutes 09 seconds East, along the easterly line of said LOT 1 for
100.00 feet; thence South 18 degrees 40 minutes 15 seconds East,
continuing along said easterly line for 63.25 feet; thence North 00
degrees 14 minutes 09 seconds West for 159.90 feet to an intersection
with the easterly extension of the northerly line of said LOT 1, thence
North 89 degrees 57 minutes 33 seconds West, along said easterly
extension for 20.00 feet to the point of beginning.
All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not
the above proposed easement vacation is in the public interest and should be made
shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the extent to
which such proposed easement vacation affects existing easements within the area
of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the
authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling
electric, telephone, or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or
water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to
continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion
thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto,
for the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to
which any or all of any such easements, and such authority to maintain, and to
enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL.
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
HEARING DATE OF 7110/89 SET FOR FAIRVIEW SODTHDALE HOSPITAL REVENUE BONDS Doug
Robinson, Administrator of Fairview Southdale Hospital, presented the request for
scheduling a public hearing on July 10, 1989 on the proposal for the City to issue
revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed $17,000,000. The purpose for the
financing is to cover facilities and equipment needs; some of these dollars will
pay for projects that have recently been completed or ones the hospital will be
invested in shortly. Mr. Robinson pointed out that these bonds will not include
any dollars for the medical office building or the parking ramp now under
construction at the site. They will include include projects like the new
intensive care unit completed last fall, the maternity service remodeling
completed last year, future remodeling and expansion of emergency medical
services, the heart diagnostic center and the magnetic residence imaging unit now
under construction, etc.
Member Kelly asked for statistics on the number of Edina residents using the
hospital. Mr. Robinson stated that the hospital serves about 42% of the people
from Edina who go to hospitals. Mayor Richards requested that additional
information on this question be included in the presentation on July 10 and that
the hospital also respond to concerns raised by staff relating to the hospital's
image in the community. Member Kelly asked whether the rumor was true that
Fairview Southdale would be somehow involved in the Ebenezer Society's proposed
project on York Avenue. Mr. Robinson stated that they have no plans at this point
to be involved but that the possibility exists.
Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION RELATING TO A PROJECT
ON BEHALF-OF FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL AND HEALTHCARE SERVICES
UNDER THE MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT;
CALLING FOR & PUBLIC HEARING THEREON
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the
"Municipality "), as follows;
SECTION 1
Recitals
1.1 The Municipality is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152
through 469.165 (the "Act "), to issue its revenue bonds to finance capital
projects consisting of properties used and useful in connection with a
revenue - producing enterprise, whetehr or not operated for profit, engaged in
providing health care services, including hospitals. Fairview Hospital and
Healthcare Services, a Minnesota non - profit corporation ( "Fairview "), which owns
and operates Fairview Southdale Hospital (the "Hospital ") located in the
Municipality, has requested the Municipality issue its revenue bonds in an
aggregate total amount not to exceed $17,000,000 (the "Bonds ") to finance a
portion or all of the cost of additions and improvements to the Hospital and the
acquisition and installation of items of equipment in the Hospital.
SECTION 2
Public Hearing
2.1 Section 469.154 Subdivision 4 of the Act requires that prior to submission of
an Application to the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development
requesting approval of the Project as required by Section 469.154 Subdivision 3 of
the Act, this Council conduct a public hearing on the proposal to'undertake and
finance the Project. Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, and regulations promulgated thereunder, requires that prior to this
issuance of the Bonds, this Council approve the Bonds and the Project, after
conducting a public hearing thereon. A public hearing on the proposal to
undertake and finance the Project through the issuance of the Bonds is hereby
called and shall be held on July 10, 1989, at 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the City Hall.
2.2 The City Clerk shall cause notice of the public hearing to be published in
the Edina Sun - Current, the official newspaper of the Municipality and a newspaper
of general circulation in the Municipality, at least once not less than fourteen
(14) nor more than thirty (30) days prior to the date fixed for the public
hearing. The notice to be published shall bein substantially the following form:
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSED PROJECT AND
THE ISSUANCE OF HOSPITAL SYSTEM REVENUE
BONDS UNDER THE MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT ACT, MINNESOTA STATUTES.
SECTIONS 469.152- 469.165
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota
(the City), will meet on July 10, 1989, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. at the City Hall,
4801 W. 50th Street, in Edina, Minnesota, for the purpose of conducting a public
hearing on a proposal that the City issue revenue bonds, in one or more series,
under the Municipal Industrial Development Act, Minnesota Statutes, Sections
469.152- 469.165, in order to finance all or a portion of the cost of a project on
behalf of Fairview Hospital and Healthcare Services, a Minnesota nonprofit
corporation ( "Fairview "). The proposed project will consist of various additions
and improvements to and the acquisition and installation of various items of
equipment in Fairview Southdale Hospital, which is owned by Fairview and located
at 6401 France Avenue South in the City. The maximum aggregate principal amount
of the proposed bond issue is $17,000,000. The bonds will be limited obligations
of the City, and the bonds and interest thereon will be payable solely from the
revenues pledged to the payment therof. No holder of any such bonds will ever
have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the
bonds or the interest thereon, nor to enforce payment against any property of the
City except moneys payable by Fairview to the City and pledged to the payment of
the bonds.
A draft copy of the proposed Application to the Minnesta Department of Trade
and Economic Development for approval of the project, together with draft copies
of all attachments and exhibits thereto, is available for public inspection at the
office of the City Clerk between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 4:30 P.M., on normal
business days.
All persons interested may appear and be heard at the tie and place set forth
above, or may file written comments with the City Clerk prior to the date of the
hearing -set forth above.
Dated: June 19, 1989.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Marcella Daehn
City Clerk
2.3 A draft copy of the proposed Application to the Minnesota Department of Trace
and Economic Development, together with draft copies of all attachments and
exhibits thereto, are hereby ordered placed on file with the City Clerk and shall
be available for public inspection, following publication of the notice of public
hearing, between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 4:30 P.M., on normal business days.
Adopted this 19th day of June, 1989.
ATTEST.:
City Clerk
Mayor
Motion for the adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Rice and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
and the following voted against the same:
None
whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
HEARING DATE FOR PLASTICS BAN ORDINANCE CHANGED TO 7124/89 - Motion made by member
Kelly to re -set the hearing date on the Plastics Ban Ordinance to July 24, 1989.
Member Smith gave a second to the motion.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion Carried.
SHHSC TO REQUEST INCREASE IN FUNDING Member Kelly commented that she had attended
a South Hennepin Human Services Council (SHHSC) budget meeting at they indicated
that SHHSC would be asking for a $7,550 increase in funding and asked what this
would be used for. Susan Wohlrabe responded that the increase was partially for
rent, additional staff, salaries and inflation, but is mainly for rent. Member
Kelly asked, if there are public facilities available for a service organization.
such as this, why pay rent. The Human Relations Commission will be studying this
funding request and will be making a recommendation to Council at the budget
hearings.
RESIGNATION ACCEPTED FROM THE COMMUNITY EDUCATION SERVICES BOARD Member Smith
spoke submitted a letter from Elie Reid regarding her resignation as the City
representative to the Community Education Services Board. He referred to his
memorandum of June 16, 1989 suggesting that her replacement be an individual who
was considered for the open seat on the City Council.
NOMINATIONS REQUESTED FOR AMM REGIONAL TRANSIT BOARD Manager Rosland noted that
the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM) Bulletin of June 6, 1989
indicated that two nominations are required for positions on the Regional Transit
Board. The Legislature has reorganized this Board with compulsory membership
being at eight, with at least two being elected county officials and four elected
city or town officials. Discussion was held soliciting interest in serving from
the Edina City Council Members. Mayor Richards expressed an interest in his name
being put in for nomination if the meetings did not conflict with Council
meetings. Manager Rosland mentioned that there are five other committees needing
members: Municipal Revenues, Metropolitan Agencies, Housing and Economic
Development, General Legislation and Transportation. The Council was told if
there is any interest, to make sure the ARM is notified. Questions should be
directed to staff.
CONCERN NOTED REGARDING SALE OF CAHILL SCHOOL FOR DEVELOPMENT - Member Kelly
voiced concern about the article in the newspaper regarding the sale of Cahill
School for development. The building was sold by the School District with the
idea that it would always be a school and the neighborhood believed that the
integrity would be protected. Now we are looking at a development - we are not
sure who or what. Member Kelly asked that the zoning be reviewed, that we look
carefully at the possibilities for the site. She added that she was also
concerned about the traffic on West 70th Street, that it backs up exiting from
Highway 100. Member Kelly suggested a meeting between City and School people to
look at the possibility of establishing a joint powers agreement in purchasing
that building. She said she is not saying there is a need for this building but
could see some things in the future, e.g. pre - school education, handicapped
education, senior center, etc., wherein the two governmental bodies might use the
building. Member Kelly reiterated she wants the City prepared when the proposal
to develop this property comes before the Council.
Member Smith commented that the City does not have the money to consider a joint
venture to purchase this and recalled that Cahill School was the most expensive
building to maintain in the School District. Member Kelly commented that she
wants the City to be aware of the possibility that needs could be met by acquiring
the building. Mayor Richards said that he did not agree with this idea. As to
zoning, he said that is in place, R -1 District.
STAFF COMPLIMENTED ON RECYCLING PHAMPHLET Member Smith complimented staff on the
recycling pamphlet which had been included in the Council packet.
COUNCIL STUDY SESSIONS TIME DISCUSSED Member Paulus raised the question of the
hours for the informal Council Study Sessions, specifically the September 16 date.
Pros and cons were discussed about the hours to meet. An informal poll was taken
with agreement that the Saturday hours would be from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon. ,
CONCERN NOTED OVER PELLET WAR GAMES PLAYED ON GREEN FARMS ROAD Mayor Richards
stated he had received a call from a gentleman who had spoken to Chief Swanson
regarding war games that are being played with paint pellets in the location of
Green Farms Road. The gentleman was asked to make a presentation at the Council
meeting, and may do that upon acquiring information. His main reason for calling
was that he is not happy with these activities going on in the area. Apparently
this is not something that can be restricted by ordinance but is something that
should be stopped.
*CLAIMS PAID .Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice to
approve payment of the following claims as per pre -list dated 6/19/89: General
Fund $725,017.85, C.D.B.G. $1,024.00, Art Center $6,051.09, Capital Fund $86.66,
Swimming Pool Fund $3,362.07, Golf Course Fund $155,584.48, Recreation Center Fund
$112,974.59, Edinborough Park $8,361.83, Utility Fund $9,864.08, Storm Sewer
Utility $131.67, Liquor Dispensary Fund $98,363.06, Construction Fund $110,953.11,
IMP Bond Redemption #2, $89,001.18, Total $1,322,775.67, and for confirmation of
payment of Claims dated 5/31/89: General Fund $574,651.37, Art Center $1,082.62,
Swimming Pool Fund $601.47, Golf Course Fund $14,742.63, Recreation Center Fund
$9,849.42, Gun Range Fund $1,703.93, Edinborough Park $8,801.09, Utility Fund
$21,268.11, Liquor Dispensary Fund $212,891.75, Total $845,592.39.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the
meeting adjourned at 10:45 P.M.
Darlene J. Skare
Acting City Clerk
�c
l '
i
d�•L
I ..-
F/ 71 e I
r
o w A 09 D
4e 7i/ llfm� AwwQ
tV-7e1 A9401-094 ea(.
4/76 i 70 u Ae 5.
�7
D g - 4;iz"W-t.QJ Rol .
u/07 U 4$" St.
Y-rvy
Y 4 / 9 �.
yc //.
�cau i %wcJ�Aa c�.Q.Gnc�r,✓ �foea ,adp Pd
A=4- "1 y boo
�f,,,urlAr- PA
Qov SoK^)YyaE w
4L l ( 140_JF,) v4vf 5o
Olt, Arden Ax�-
on/ aAp 4V�'.
'1701 O�rr��i
q7en
�761�jOVJ74
0.- 2-
I r4
A.
�1
� e22 ,
0
•' ~�RPOSNt�9•
lace
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To :
Kenneth Rosland
Agenda Item #
II.
A:
From:
Craig Larsen
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Date:
August 7, 1989
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
Building Permit
To Council
application for Lot 9,
'White Oaks 2nd Addn.
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
-
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
_.
Recommendation:
Adopt decision as stated in attached Findings of Fact, Decision, and Reasons.
Info /Background:
The proposed Findings, Decision and Reasons were sent to Mr. Andron, representing
the property owners, and Mr. Schmid, representing White Oaks Improvement Assoc.,
on July 27, 1989. Both.parties were advised that the Council would consider
the proposed Findings at its August 7, 1989, meeting.
1
CITY OF EDINA
In the Matter of the
Application of Andron,
Inc., for a Building
Permit for Lot 9, White
Oaks 2nd Addition
2742g :TSE :072689
On March 14, 1989, Andron, Inc. (the "Proponent ")
applied for a building permit for the construction of a single
family dwelling unit on Lot 9, White Oaks 2nd Addition (the
"Subject Property "). Subsequent to such application the City
Staff has requested from the Proponent soils investigations,
engineering studies relative to storm water drainage from the
Subject Property and the adjoining Lot 1, White Oaks 3rd
Addition (the "Adjoining Lot "), and site plans for the location
of the proposed improvements. Most of the required information
was finally received on or about June 1, 1989, but the
information received has raised additional questions relative
to necessary flood - proofing of the proposed house on the
Subject Property and to the capability of the house to
withstand anticipated lateral hydrostatic pressure.
Information relative to those questions has not yet been
received. Because of the environmental and safety concerns
raised by this potential development, the City Staff has kept
the City Council continuously advised of the progress of the
building permit application; and on June 19, 1989, at a public
meeting, the City Council heard evidence relative to issuance
of the permit from Catherine T. Ecklund (former owner of the
Subject Property and Adjoining Lot), Mr. Connor F. Schmid
(resident of the White Oaks area and Secretary /Treasurer of the
White Oaks Improvement Association), Mr. Fred Hoisington (a
principal in the Hoisington Group, Inc., land use consultants,
and a former Planner for the City of Edina) and other
interested citizens, and Mr. Richard J. Andron, representing
Andron, Inc. The City Council, having heard and reviewed all
of the facts and arguments presented by the Proponent and its
experts, the City Staff and property owners in the vicinity of
the Subject Property and their experts, and having heard and
reviewed the evidence and law adduced by the Proponent and its
experts, the City Staff, and such property owners and their
experts, and being fully advised, after due consideration,
hereby makes the following
Findings of Fact:
1. The White Oaks neighborhood is an area lying between
the easterly boundary of the Country Club area and France
2742g:TSE:072689
Avenue and between Sunnyside Road and 48th Street. White Oaks
has an unusual and very diverse terrain with many steep hills
and low spots. It also has a considerable number of trees,
especially large oaks for which the area is named and known.
"The whole White Oaks area was platted and developed by one
primary developer, Frank Ecklund. This was done through a
series of six White Oaks plats, which were initiated in 1937
and fully integrated by a partial replatting in 1942 through a
comprehensive auditor's subdivision (Auditor's Subdivision No.
319). The use of curving roads and placement and sizing of
lots and houses with regard to the irregular topography has
taken advantage of the unusual views and vistas. The developer
also preserved three significant open spaces for the three
marshes.or meadows within White Oaks. The largest central
marsh, commonly called the White Oaks Meadow, was conveyed in
1940 to a voluntary nonprofit organization of White Oaks
homeowners (the White Oaks Improvement Association) so that the
meadow could be maintained as an open, natural park. Another
marsh area is on the northwesterly part of'Meadow Road. The
third marsh or open area is located at the Subject Property and
Adjoining Lot. These three separate marsh areas, together with
a marsh area along the south side of 48th Street, provide
substantial environment and cover for ducks, pheasants, marsh
and other birds, frogs, and an occasional fox and deer. The
unusual circumstances of the White Oaks area make it a very
unique and attractive area for its residents and the City and
for many members of the rest of the community who enjoy its
natural open spaces and trees. Significantly, all of the White
Oaks area consisting of approximately 65 lots developed quite
rapidly except for the Subject Lot and the Adjoining Lot. The
proposed development would be at the north entrance to the
White Oaks area and would, with the proposed fill for the
development and intrusion into the marsh, significantly and
adversely affect the aesthetic features of that entry.
2. The Subject Lot and Adjoining Lot have basically
the same topography with the elevation of most of both
properties being approximately 868 feet. Both properties serve
as a receptacle for an approximately 17 -acre drainage area.
This was acknowledged by the original developers when, by deed
given in 1941, J. Frank Ecklund and Catherine T. Ecklund
conveyed an easement over the Adjoining Lot to the then Village
of Edina for collection and retention of surface water. Also,
the Subject Property and Adjoining Lot are a Type VII Forested
Wetland, i.e., a wetland that is wooded with water - logged
soils, based on the criteria established in the United States
Geological Survey, Circular No. 39.
3. In 1984 the Subject Property and the Adjoining Lot
were acquired by Kenneth J. Monroe and Barbara L. Monroe,
-2-
2742g:TSE:072689
husband and wife. After an unsuccessful attempt in 1986 to
resubdivide and develop a higher and dryer portion of the
Subject Property in combination with Lots 16 and 17, Auditor's
Subdivision No. 319 (see City File S- 86 -9), Mr. and Mrs. Monroe
delivered to the City of Edina attorney, in escrow, quitclaim
deeds dated December 26, 1986, conveying the Subject Property
and the Adjoining Lot to the City for "park, open space and
storm water ponding purposes." This proposed development and
the escrowed deeds again acknowledged the status of the Subject
Property and the Adjoining Lot as ponding and open space
areas. However, the deeds were never delivered out of escrow,
but, instead, the Monroes by Purchase Agreement dated
January 28, 1987, sold the Subject Property, and Adjoining Lot
to Andron, Inc. and R.J. Andron. Andron, Inc. and R.J. Andron
refused to complete purchase of the Subject Property and
Adjacent'Lot pursuant to said Purchase Agreement because the
property "is unmarketable as a buildable lot, . . . ." The
Monroes sued to enforce the purchase agreement.
4. On February 15, 1989, the City offered -to buy the
properties from the Monroes for $26,600 (the City Assessor's
estimated market value), but were advised that the property had
been sold to R.J. Andron. On March 7, 1989, the City offered
to buy the properties from R.J. Andron and Andron, Inc. for the
same price, but were advised, on March 9, 1989, that Andron,
Inc. had a contract to design and build a home on the Subject
Property. By deed dated March 9, 1989, the Monroes conveyed
the Subject Property and the Adjacent Lot to Richard J. Andron
and Andron, Inc. On the same day, R.J. Andron and Andron, Inc.
conveyed both properties to James M. Brown and Helen G. Brown,
husband and wife. On March 14, 1989, the building permit to
develop the Subject Property was applied for. It is presumed
that the Proponent is acting as the agent for the Browns in
connection with the building permit application. The City
Staff and City Council have had no communications of any kind
with Mr. or Mrs. Brown.
5. As stated above, the Subject Property and the
Adjacent Lot fit the classification requirements for a Type VII
Forested Wetland, i.e., a wetland that is wooded with
water - logged soil, and intermittently has standing water. The
bottom elevation of the properties is approximately 867 feet,
and almost the whole of both properties is at or below an
elevation of approximately 868. The 100 -year flood elevation
for this area is at 872 -874 depending on the circumstances. A
long term snow melt, because of lack of an outlet and frozen
soils, could result in a higher flood elevation. The
properties have unstable soils to a depth of 11 or 12 feet.
The properties have served, and presently serve, as a recharge
basin replenishing ground water supplies.
-3-
2742g:TSE:072689
6. The adjoining public street has a lowest elevation
of approximately 872 feet, and is, therefore, subject to
flooding from storm waters draining to the properties. If the
street floods the City would have to pump the water up the hill
to Sunnyside Road and into the storm sewer system.
7. The-house proposed for the Subject Property will
be built on about 8 feet of fill. The fill would raise the
proposed house's lowest opening elevation to 876.3 which is
approximately two feet above the 100 -year flood elevation, but
the basement floor elevation would only be at approximately 868
feet, which is one foot above the bottom of the pond and four
to six feet below the 100 -year flood elevation, thus creating
the potential for flooding and an unstable foundation due to
hydrostatic pressures. The Subject Property, including
possibly the driveway, but excluding the house as elevated, and
the Adjoining Lot, would be flooded, essentially making the
house an island.
8. The proposed development will require an 11 to 12
foot excavation to eliminate unstable soils, a drain tile
system, a reinforced basement to withstand hydrostatic
pressures, flood - proofing, a sewage lift station and a positive
drainage system.
9. Also, the proposed development will reduce
existing.storage of surface water, will increase the 100 -year
flood elevation and will increase the potential for future
flooding problems. The Proponent's experts claim the loss of
storage capacity will be 8% and the increased flood elevation
will be an additional 0.3 feet.
10. The three methods proposed for providing positive
drainage and mitigation of potential future flood problems are
temporary pumping, excavating for additional flood storage and
a permanent lift station and force main system.
The temporary pumping solution would require the City
to use portable pumps to pump down the pond during flood
conditions. This solution assumes the availability of the
necessary number and size of pumps, the availability during
flood conditions of workers to place and operate the pumps, the
ability to reach the desired pumping locations and the
availability of electricity when needed to run the pumps.
However, the needed availability and ability is usually least
available and able when needed most, i.e., during a heavy
storm. Therefore, this solution contains great risk that the
pumping will not occur when needed most. Also, this solution
imposes continuous, on -going potential for costs to be incurred
by the City due solely to this proposed development. Also,
before and while pumping is occurring, the adjoining street may
be flooded creating public safety and nuisance concerns.
-4-
2742g :TSE:072689
The excavating solution will result in an excavation
approximately 6 feet deep, 100 feet long and 120 feet wide.
Even with such an excavation, pumping might be required to
remove water from around the proposed house if sustained water
levels were higher than normal. City Ordinance No. 1031
declares as a nuisance affecting health "All ponds or pools of
stagnant water." Also, it'declares as a nuisance affecting
public peace and safety "Any well, hole or excavation left
uncovered or in such other condition as to constitute a hazard
to a child or other persons, being or coming upon the premises
where the same is located; . ." It is possible, with the
present water table, or in wet years, that the water would
continually stand in the excavation. In any event, water will
stand intermittently in the excavation, and if the excavation
silts up water will not percolate but will stagnate in the area.
The lift station and force main solution will cost
approximately $33,000 to construct. It is, by far, the most
expensive solution. The Proponent has offered to pay only
$8,000 of that cost. The original cost (in excess of the
Proponent's offer) and all future maintenance and replacement
would have to be paid by the City or assessed against the
Subject Property and the Adjoining Lot, and possibly other
lots, which would present continuous problems for the City
relative to proving benefits to the properties assessed in at
least the amount assessed. Also, it has some of the inherent
defects of the temporary pumping solution, i.e., the lift
station -could break down, or electric power could be cut off,
when needed most, during a heavy storm. Based on the letter
dated June 1, 1989, from the Proponent's consulting engineer,
even the Proponent believes that this alternative is not
feasible because of the cost.
11. The City Zoning Ordinance (Section 7.G) requires
that "Surface water shall be properly channeled into storm
sewers, watercourses, ponding areas or other public
facilities. All provisions for drainage . . . shall be
reviewed and approved by the (City] Engineer prior to
construction or installation." Also, the City Building Code
(Section 2905(f)) requires that "Provisions shall be made for
the control and drainage of surface water around buildings."
12. The proposed house is proposed to have a front
street setback of 51.4 feet. The City Zoning Ordinance
(Section ll.G.l(a)) states that when more than 25% of the
frontage on one side of a street between intersections is
occupied by buildings with setbacks of more or less than 30
feet, the average setback of such existing buildings shall be
maintained by all new buildings on the same side of the street
and between said intersections. In'the case of the proposed
-5-
2742g:TSE:072689
development,, there are two possible areas "between
intersections." One is from Bridge Lane to the Townes Road
cul -de -sac, and the other is from Bridge Lane to Sunnyside
Road. Using the former area, the setback is 58.5 feet; using
the latter area, the setback is 51.4 feet. North of the
Subject Property, toward Sunnyside Road, there is a large open
area (being the Adjacent Lot) and one house on Sunnyside Road
which is separated from the Subject Property by the Adjoining
Lot, a wooded area and vegetation. South of the Subject
Property all lots are developed and in close proximity to the
Subject Property, and, because of the turn in Townes Road by
the Subject Property, the proposed house on the Subject
Property would appear to be closer to the street than the
houses south of it.
Based on the foregoing facts, the City Council makes
the following
Decision:
That a building permit, and other necessary permits,
for the proposed development of the Subject Property should not
be issued, and the City Staff is directed not to issue such
permits.
The foregoing decision is made for the following
Reasons:
1. The development is a Type VII wetland, a natural
and long standing receptacle for receiving and ponding storm
water. The development will increase the-potential for
flooding to the detriment and damage of the proposed house and
the adjoining public street. The proposed methods of
mitigating that potential for flooding and damage (temporary
pumps, excavation and lift station with force main) are not
acceptable methods for the reasons set out in paragraph 10 of
the Findings and do not comply with the City Zoning Ordinance
or Building Code.
2. The proposed house will, in periods of sustained
high water, possibly suffer flooding conditions and at least
will incur hydrostatic pressures on the basement floor and
foundation which may result in continuous difficulties to the
property owner and possible claims against the developers and
prior owners as well as the City for issuing a building permit
to build in an area of known water problems.
3. The Proponent and Mr. and Mrs. Brown knew or
should have known of the difficulty of development on the
-6-
2742g:TSE :072689
Subject Property due to its obvious wetland characteristics and
the fact that it is the last undeveloped property in the White
Oaks area. Therefore, the Proponent and Mr. and Mrs. Brown
cannot have any valid investment backed expectations relative
to the Subject Property.
4. If'the proposed development of the Subject
Property occurs, the resulting increased potential for flooding
and increased potential.for standing water will cause nuisances
and hazards contrary to Edina ordinances.
5. The front street setback should be 58.5 feet and
not the proposed 51.4 feet because the proposed house clearly
relates to the houses south of it and not to the properties
(with but one house) north of it.
6. The proposed development would destroy the
character and symmetry of the White Oaks area as intended and
preserved for over 50 years.
-7-
August 2, 1989
Dear Edina City Council,
AGENDA ITEM II.A
This letter comes to express our great concern and dis-
appointment about plans being proposed to construct a
residence on Lot 9 of the White Oaks Second Addition. We
have appreciated and enjoyed the existence of that beautiful
wooded nature-area on frequent walks and feel it adds
character and value to the neighborhood. One of the definite
assets of Edina is the care previous planners and developers
have taken to assure the feel of a unique, progressive yet attractive
community that is not like every other suberb.
A second very critical'and painful issue for us is the pros-
pect of building a pump station to pump storm water to Bridge
and Arden. The storm water drainage has been a forty plus years
problem on Arden which the city partially corrected the summer
of 1988 with the addition of two more drainage grids. The
pumping of water from the natural drainage area into the storm
sewer that drains Arden is beyond our comprehension. In the.
past accumulation of 1.to 4+ feet of water on the street was
not unusual with 1 -2 inch rains. Even now, during heavy rains,
water tends to spill over the curbs onto owner's properties.
The addition of more storm water into a system that is at best
barely adequate does not make sense. Further the installation
of a pump lift station at a cost of $32,000 to the city (less
Andron's proposed $8000) so that one residence can.be constructed
is particularly upsetting - Where is the logic in this?
Allocating $32,000 for the benefit of one property owner at
the expense of 20+ property owners who would be placed at
greater risk of their homes now flooding and property being
destroyed is irresponsible stewardship. Are we not then jus-
tified in awaiting our own city provided pump system when our
basement floods due to an inadequate city sewer system? Is
the city concerned about its residents and community= main-
taining its beauty and safety, or about one costly project?
Is there truely a question to be asked?
With great concern.
Sincerely,
L �
Noel & Nancy Hauge
4611 Arden Ave. So.
ii
o e
0
R
ronwi�`�•
,see
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Kenneth Rosland
From: Craig Larsen
Date: August 7, 1989
Subject: vacation of Drainage and
Utility easement. 6728
Apache Road
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # U -
A.
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Fx-1
To Council
Action
0
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Approve proposed drainage easement vacation.
Info /Background: '
The proposed vacation would allow for the construction of additional decking
and for stairs from new and existing deck areas. The proposed area to be
vacated is small and all of the vacated area is above the 100 year flood
elevation for the pond.
The proposed vacation has been reviewed and approved by the private utility
companies and by the City Engineer.
CREEK
N ; ELEM.
InDIA
x - ! MI L•
CIRC i
4 fib:: �� Y • V t
a
�j i`` r}w`�e,
� � tip+ �fzi ti+a •�••
i WEST t
Al
v%� "'v` .1?• All
t Y Y L A • ••••:
ST. AL
IR00 IS EPISC
AM t
,f CI C E
PAj
CIR =
G\ <aw
o •
�aC'1 a '`.. ` tai _` • - - ► JUTE P S$ , V;• �'a Y
cc
BRAIIII
O �
a
•• ,^ 7 ....'1•p�•,✓.i ,� � \;�•;: J. � 3. �'• fit• •!
� •�•; - yr+ � ,'
t
t
•r COMPLEX,; ;
N
EAST 129.94
/ o -.... 60.00
I ` 1
` I
I -0RAIN AGE a UTILITY N \EASEMENT -'' �z
• ` O � I
\
5 F
S z
H f
O N
2 W
a
O
u
a
z
a
5
I �
I
I• 0 '`DRAINAGE 9 UTILITY EASEMENT ...
I
WEST 130.00
c
s.
N �
a
T
N
O ,
O
N
9•SB'31"W.
J4R4 _t
O
O
10 0
I
1
_O
APACHE ROAD I 0
w
CITY OF EDINA
PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY VACATION APPLICATION
-Date Initiated
1) I hereby petition the City Council of the City of Edina to vacate all of the following
described public right -of -way:
Street Alley Utility Easement
Drainage Easement Other '
(describe)
Description of area proposed to be vacated:
14, /Is
�TC '.A
A i .+ + •+
Attached copy of scaled drawing showing in full detail the proposed vacation.
Signature
Address
Telephone 9V e" 7 i
2) Review
CITY ENGINEER by Acceptable
Conditions
MINNEGASCO by Acceptable
Conditions
Opposed Conditional
=Opposed =Conditional
N.W. BELL by Acceptable Opposed Q Conditional
Conditions
N.S.P. by Acceptable =Opposed Conditional
Conditions
10 -3800
Agenda Item III. A.
Consent Item
0j,D
0 � 199
SO
August 7, 1989
Dear Edina City Council Members,
Thank: you for considering our request to vacate a small
portion of the easement which is located on our property at
678 Apache Road. Unfortunately, my husband and I are out
of town and can not attend the meeting, however, we have.
arranged for Ed Baines, our landscape architect, to
represent us and answer any questions you may have.
We would like part of the easement forgiven so that we can
add stairs from the deck: to the backyard and square off the
triangular shaped deck. Currently the deck's small size and
shape does not permit room for any seating and does not
allow access to the backyard.
We have discussed alternative solutions to this problem with
the Edina inspector on site. Our conclusion is that the
attached proposal is the only worktable one and requires the
least amount of modification of the easement.
We believe that the support posts will not affect our
property or that of any of our neighbors in any adverse way.
Again, thank you for your consideration of this matter.
Sincerely,
x
Nancy . Hopf PatricF :: A. Hoff
Y p
6728 Apache Road, Edina, MN 55435 94 -6677
AGENDA ITEM IV.A.
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: August 7, 1989
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Ken Rosland
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. 122
At the last City Council meeting on July 24, 1989, questions arose
concerning the costs of the proposed changes in the benefits within
Ordinance No. 122.
SEVERANCE - The proposal is to change the benefit from four weeks pay to
six weeks pay after 20 years of service. This change would provide
benefit to non - bargaining unit employees equal to the benefit provided
for unionized employees. We have an average of 2 employees per year
that would be eligible for this benefit. The additional cost in excess
of our current practice would be a range of $948 to $2,465 per employee.
The range in pay is reflective of the range in pay between a clerk and
department head. As I mentioned to you before, this is a non - funded
liability. We fund the cost of severance generally by back - filling the
retiree's position with an employee at a lower rate of pay.
VACATION - The proposal is to increase vacation accrual by one day per
each year of service for employees for years 10 through 15.
The following schedule illustrates the shift in cost from paid working
time to paid vacation time. Vacation is a funded liability, therefore,
the additional cost to the City is in a decrease in productive time of
an employee of one additional day per year between the years 10 and 15.
The rationale for the change in vacation accrual is to provide an
additional benefit to employees who stay with the City longer than ten
years. As you can see that after year five of employment, employees
receive a lump- increase in vacation of 40 hours. There is no further
change in an employee's vacation benefit until after the fifteenth year
of employment at which time the employee receives another lump
adjustment of 40 hours of vacation. This is an attempt to spread the
increase of vacation benefit over time as opposed to a lump adjustment
at the end of the fifteenth year.
l .. -
Mayor and City Council
August 7, 1989
Page Two
TERMINAL PAY - The City currently pays for vacation accrued but unused
to a maximum of 26 days (208 hours). The new proposal would allow
employees to accrue an additional 4 days (32 hours) or a total of 30
days (240 hours). Because vacation is a funded liability, the cost to
the City is in productive time. The benefit to the City is that we
would gain four days of productive time from an employee wishing to have
his or her accrual of vacation to increase beyond the current twenty -six
day maximum. The benefit to the employee is the ability to take a
larger benefit in terminal pay.
PARENTAL LEAVE - This change in the Ordinance is in response to a
statutory requirement providing parental leave of six weeks for
employees. Leave is without pay and is available to both male and
female employees. Most of the proposed language in this section is
taken directly from the League of Minnesota Cities' Model Ordinance.
The City's Attorneys approved the language as meeting the statutory
requirements.
The proposed changes and benefits are consistent with communities that
we traditionally compare ourselves to in the Stanton Report.
If you have further questions regarding the Ordinance No. 122 or the
handbook, please call me or Ceil Smith.
PAID
WORK TIME
PAID
VACATION
Proposed
Current
Proposed
Current
0
- 5 YEARS
2000 hrs.
2000 hrs.
80 hrs.
-80 hrs.
6
- 10 YEARS
1960
1960
120
120
11
YEARS
1952
1960
128
120
12
YEARS
1944
1960
136
120
13
YEARS
1936
1960
144
120
14
YEARS
1928
1960
152
120
15
YEARS
1920
1960
160
120
16
YEARS
1920
1920
160
160
TERMINAL PAY - The City currently pays for vacation accrued but unused
to a maximum of 26 days (208 hours). The new proposal would allow
employees to accrue an additional 4 days (32 hours) or a total of 30
days (240 hours). Because vacation is a funded liability, the cost to
the City is in productive time. The benefit to the City is that we
would gain four days of productive time from an employee wishing to have
his or her accrual of vacation to increase beyond the current twenty -six
day maximum. The benefit to the employee is the ability to take a
larger benefit in terminal pay.
PARENTAL LEAVE - This change in the Ordinance is in response to a
statutory requirement providing parental leave of six weeks for
employees. Leave is without pay and is available to both male and
female employees. Most of the proposed language in this section is
taken directly from the League of Minnesota Cities' Model Ordinance.
The City's Attorneys approved the language as meeting the statutory
requirements.
The proposed changes and benefits are consistent with communities that
we traditionally compare ourselves to in the Stanton Report.
If you have further questions regarding the Ordinance No. 122 or the
handbook, please call me or Ceil Smith.
At I
°
0. ; REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
a o:
`„ttn.�w•u
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Park Director
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: July 21, 1989 AGENDA ITEM VI.A .
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Playground Equipment for McGuire Park
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1• Flanagan Sales. Inc. 1 -• $ 10,116
2' Earl F. Anderson and Associates, Inc. 2• 10,123
3•. Gerber Leisure Products, Inc. 3• 11,255
4. 4
5. 5
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR EID:
Flanagan Sales, Inc. $ 10,116
GENERAL INFORMATION:
One aluminum post Playbooster playground equipment with
tenderdecks for McGuire Park.
ire DenartmPnt
The Recommended bid is 1,�.,, �2
within budget not withjnet Vll�llin, Firce Director
Kenneth Rosland, City
�9` 4A.
° e -'`, � ` REQUEST e o; S FOR PURCHASE
TO: City Council Members
FROM: Bob Kojetin,, Director Parks-and Recreation
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE August 2, 1989
AGENDA ITEM V T - R
F1TEM DESCRIPTION: Arneson House Building Addition
COMPANY
ALTERNATE RECOMMENDED
1. W.H. Cates
BASE BID
$219,000
DEDUCTIONS DEDUCTIONS I
$12,534.
TOTAL
2.
David Volkman Constr.
229,934
,$15,647
18,300
$206,460
211,634
3.
Dean & Associates
232,000
16,850
215,150
4.
Morcon Construction
237,200
15,000
222,'200
5.
Palani Construction
244,500
15,400
229,100
6.
Frerichs Construction
253,000
16,900
236,100
7.
Socon Construction
257,900
17,590
240,310
8.
- Haymaker Construction
260,000
13,900
246,100
9.
KM Building Company
279,900
18,030
261,870
10.
Steenburg- Henkel
280,700
14,065
266,635
11.
Met Con Metro Co.
290,200
17,229
272,971
12.
Meisinger Constr.
292,900
15,800
277,100
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR'SD:
W.H. Cates $206,460
GENERAL INFORMATION:
There is presently $219,000 in the Arneson Acres museum account which was
raised by the Centennial. Presently, this account receives $1,000 /month in
interest.
The recommended bid is W.H. Cates at $206,460. In addition, we have
approximately $12,000 in soft cost which brings the total committed to
$218,000'. The Edina Historical Society will be purchasing-furniture,
shelving and rugs for the_ interior, which will be acquired from the
Historical Society's budget.
The Recommended bid is
within budget
el
not
Kenneth Rosland, !
Manager
Director
�9lrtA Art1r
° '` REQUEST F
OR PURCHASE
TO: City Council Members
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director of Parks and Recreation
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: August 2, 1989
AGENDA ITEM. VI . c
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Resurfacing of tennis courts
Company Amount of Quote or &d
1. Gopher State Sealcoat, Inc. 1 $ 9,600.00
2. Finley Bros. Enterprises 2. $ 10,,955.00
3, Recreational Surfacers 8. $14,950.00
4. 4. -
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Gopher State Sealcoat, Inc. "$9,600.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Resurfacing of Highlands, Pamel, Utley and Weber Park
tennis courts according to specifications, including
anchoring new center strap supports at Braemar Park
(West Court) and Garden Park (East Court).
Si a, a Department
The Recommended bid is —�
within budget not w
Kenneth Rosland, City
Wallin,/FAnance Director
o e
ch
0 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
BBB
To: Kenneth Rosland
Agenda Item #
VII.
A.
From: Craig Larsen
Consent
a
Information Only
❑
Date: August 7, 1989
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject: Metropolitan Council
To Council
population estimates.
Action
El
_
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
No Action Required.
Info /Background:
Each year the Metro Council provides an estimate of households and population for
all metro area communities. These estimates are used, among other things, to set
levy limits for City budgets. For 1989, even though our household count increased
by 104 units, our population estimate declined by 1,130 persons. This was caused
by reduction in the persons per household from:2.25 to 2.18 persons.
The reduction in the persons per household is the largest we've seen in the last
10 years. Staff feels the reduction is unrealistically large. We are now in the
process of challenging the new estimate. I will advise you of the outcome of
our negotiations.
1
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL PROVISIONAL POPULATION ESTIMATE - APRIL 1, 1989
City or Township
1989 Housing Units
Estimated Total
Housing (Including
Estimate 1980 Uncompleted Estimated Estimated
By Type Housing Units 1988 Permits) Completed Occupied
'Single-Family
Multifamily
(incl. Townhouse)
Mobile Home
TOTAL
Household Estimates
1980 Household Estimate
1988 Household Estimate
1989 Household Estimate
Population Estimates
1980 Total Population
1980 Group Quarters Population
1989 Group Quarters Population
1989 Population in Households
1989 Population Estimate
Persons Per Household
1980 Persons per Household
1988 Persons per Household
1989 Persons per Household
All numbers are as of April 1 of each year.
KJP00212
-O-
•
`t0 R
ate-
6
r P
A.
e,
•'�APOMS�O •
lose
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor and Council
From: Kenneth Rosland
Date: August 7, 1989
Subject: .Petition from neighbors
adjacent to Grandview
Cemetery
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
VIII: A.
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
®
To Council
Action
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Refer complaint to staff for investigation and possible prosecution.
Info /Background:
Staff is in the process of investigating the complaint as set forth in the
attached letter. The Planning Department and Health Department are looking
into possible zoning and nuisance violations occurring at the cemetery. We
will inform the neighbors and Council of any charges that result from the
investigation.
The dirt hauling operation has been temporarily shut down twice in the last
two weeks for failure to control dust from the operation.
M
AGENDA ITEM VIII.A
rq
- - - -a-. J
r.
ILI
- ------------
so
1.
-5:L-72-Ka-
\ 0
-- -� -_ - ,�y` -`.` r.. '� �l /-LLB
183 University Ave. East
St. Paul, MN 55101 -2526
(612) 227.5600 (FAX: 221 -0986)
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayors, Managers, Clerks
FROM: Ann Higgins, Federal Liaison
Agenda Item IX.A
SUBJECT: REGISTRATION /HOTEL ACCOMMODATIONS FOR
1989 NLC CONGRESS-OF CITIES, NOVEMBER 25 -29, ATLANTA, GA.
The NLC Congress of Cities in Atlanta offers Minnesota city
officials an exciting program of workshops and plenary sessions
on key topics that will aid local government to make progress
through improved performance, participation and partnerships.
Enclosed please find a copy of the NLC program and registration
materials for the 66th NLC Congress of Cities, to be held in
Atlanta, Georgia, November 25 -29. City officials are urged to
register as soon as possible in order to obtain convenient hotel
accommodations. Note that payment in full for NLC registration is
required at the time registration is filed. Only paid registrations
will be processed.
Deadline for early registration is September 4. The final date
for advance registration is October 23. After that date, it will
be necessary to register on site. If hotel reservations are made
after Ocrober 23, room rates may be higher than those listed.
Hotel Accommodations
The workshops and committee meetings will be held at the Georgia
World Congress Center. (Please refer to the map in the brochure.)
The Omni International Center is the hotel located immediately
across the street from the World Congress Center. Other hotels
are located nearby (within walking distance for most delegates). -
NLC shuttle bus transportation is available from all hotels other
than the Omni International.
Carefully review housing information in the brochure. When sending
deposits to reserve assigned hotel accommodations, send payments
directly to the hotel, not to the NLC Registration Center. Pay
close attention to hotel reservation instructions. Note deadlines
for cancellations and changes. Most of the hotels listed accept
major national credit cards for room deposits and guaranteed
arrival; however, some accept only specific credit cards for that
purpose. Some cities prefer to use government purchase orders for
hotel accommodation payments. Please note that purchase orders,
vouchers, etc. must be received one month prior to arrival date and
are subject to hotel approval. Please be sure to check with the
specific hotel for appropriate payment arrangements.
Review the section of the brochure.entitled Hotel Accommodation
Information and pay particular attention to the deadlines for
advance housing deposits. The deposit is due as soon as you
receive confirmation of reservations from the hotel.
LMC Delegation Activities
The League is making plans to hold a number of events during the
Congress of Cities in a manner similar to the programs conducted
at the 188 NLC Congress of Cities in Boston. Locations in Atlanta
offer significant historic, educational, cultural and political
settings for program activities. Details on LMC delegation programs
and activities will be sent to city officials, along with additional
information about Atlanta and opportunities for visiting sites of
interest in the vicinity.
Last year LMC held delegation activities on Monday evening and Tuesday
morning. Please reserve time on Monday evening, November 27, and
Tuesday morning, November 28, for LMC delegation programs to be
announced..
NLC Policy Development /LMC Briefing
LMC delegates are urged to attend the LMC Delegation Briefing on
Sunday, November 26, at 5:00 - 6:00 p.m. The location of the
meeting has not yet been - determined. That information will also
be forthcoming in a future mailing on conference program details.
The following city officials are members of NLC Steering and Policy
Committees and are expected to attend NLC committee meetings to be
held on Sunday; November 26. (Some committees will meet in the
morning; others in the afternoon. Please make your travel
arrangements to permit your arrival prior to the time of committee
meetings.)
It is important for Minnesota city officials to participate in
the .NLC policy development through membership on NLC committees.
Please notify me if you know that you will be unable to continue
to serve on the committee to which you were appointed last January.
If you are interested in serving on one of the NLC committees next
year, please contact me. The LMC President appoints Minnesota
city officials to NLC policy committees each January. The League
also recommends appointment of Minnesota city officials to NLC
Steering Committee membership at that time. Officials may serve
up to four terms as NLC committee members. Attendance at meetings
is important in considering renewal of current committee appointments.
The opportunity for additional city officials to participate in the
development of NLC National Municipal Policy is also considered in
making new committee appointments each year._
Community & Economic Development
Steering Committee Member: Tony Scallen, Councilmember, Minneapolis
Policy Committee Members:
Joyce Benson, Councilmember, Duluth
Robert DeGhetto, Councilmember, Minnetonka
Leland Swanson, Mayor, Morris
Joanell Dyrstad, Mayor, Red Wing
Chuck Wolden, Councilmember, Owatonna
Energy, Environment and Natural Resources
Steering Committee Member: Steve Cramer, Councilmember, Minneapolis
Policy Committee Members:
Bernie Beerman, Councilmember, Inver Grove Heights
Dean Massett, Council Administrator, Red Wing
Edwina Garcia, Councilmember, Richfield
Robert Matson, Councilmember, Roseville
Vernon Lippert, Councilmember, Austin
Alternate: Bob Long, Councilmember, St. Paul
Finance, Administration & Intergovernmental Relations
Steering Committee Member: Millie MacLeod, Councilmember, Moorhead
President, LMC
Policy Committee Members:
Larry Bakken, Councilmember, Golden Valley
Janel Bush, Federal Liaison, Minneapolis
James Krautkremer, Mayor, Brooklyn Park
Don Ramstad, Councilmember, Maple Grove
Mark Steen, Councilmember, Duluth
Alternate: Peter Grover, Councilmember, Austin
Human Development
Steering Committee Member: Clarence Ranallo, Councilmember, St. Anthony
Policy Committee Members:
Frank Jewell, Councilmember, Duluth
Carol Johnson, Councilmember, Minneapolis
George Marks, Councilmember, St. Anthony
Steve Quam, Mayor, Richfield
Leon Steiner, Councilmember, Albert Lea
Transportation & Communications
Steering Committee Member: Pete Solinger, Alderman, Rochester
Policy Committee Members:
Karen Anderson, Councilmember, Minnetonka
Robert Benke, Mayor, New Brighton
Chuck Dehn, Councilmember, Maple Grove
Robert Sundland, Mayor, St. Anthony
(one position vacant)
Enclosure
AIRLINE RESERVATION INFORMATION
INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL EXCHANGE has agreed to make travel arrangements
to and from Atlanta for city officials attending the 1989 NLC Congress
of Cities. A contract with Northwest Airlines will be discussed to
provide arrangements to offer city officials attending the conference
the opportunity to obtain special airfare discounts of 5 percent off
the lowest fares available at.the time of booking-as well as 40
percent off regular nonrestrictive coach fares from any destination
to Atlanta during the conference.
This means that, in addition to -the flight times listed below,
city officials can take advantage of these same low rates for
departures and return flights for the conference scheduled at other
times during that week. Flyers to be sent at a later time will
detail the travel arrangement contract with Northwest Airlines
through International Travel Exchange.
International Travel Exchange has an 800 number that is available
for city officials to use in confirming your reservations. The
options provided for travel arrangements mean that those attending
may determine whether to use the discount on the Super Saver rate
(nonrefundable tickets) for the lowest fare or the discount on
the nonrestrictive airfares that allow ticketholders to make changes
in departure and return flights, if needed - without penalty.
At this time,,the following flights have been booked for use in
traveling to the 189 NLC Congress of Cities to provide for arrival
and departure times convenient to NLC conference and committee
meeting schedules. As noted above, however, it is possible to
obtain the same discounts on other scheduled flights simply by
contacting International Travel Exchange to make those arrangements.
Suggested Departure Flights
Friday, November 24
NW #760 Depart Mpls /St Paul 7:55 a.m.
NW #612 " " 12:50 p.m.
NW #764 " " 5:45 p.m.
Saturday, November 25
NW #760 Depart Mpls /St Paul 7:55 a.m.
Suggested Return Flights
Wednesday, November 29
NW #765 Depart Atlanta 5:00 p.m.
Thursday, November 30
NW #761 Depart Atlanta 7:00 a.m.
NW #763 " " 12:05 p.m.
-over-
Arrive Atlanta 11:21 a.m.
4:17 p.m.
9:08 P.M.
Arrive Atlanta 11:21 a.m.
Arrive Mpls /St Paul 6:28 p.m.
Arrive Mpls /St Paul 8:30 a.m.
" " 1:36 p.m.
Please call 612- 483 -8236 or 1- 800 -331 -2596
with Cindy Arendts at International Travel
brochures to be sent out later this summer
code number that will be assigned to the N
arrangements for Minnesota city officials.
to that code number when contacting travel
to make arrangements
Exchange. Northwest
will also specify a
LC conference flight
You may wish to refer
agency representatives.
The address for International Travel Exchange is:
International Travel Exchange
3585 North Lexington Avenue
Suite 120 (Arden Plaza)
Shoreview, MN 55126
0
r' °
el
o e
Cn
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item #
XII . A.
From: JOHN WALLIN, DIRECTOR
Consent
❑
OF FINANCE
-
Information Only
0
Date: AUGUST 7, 1989
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:.
❑
To Council
AUDIT FINDINGS
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Info /Background:
Pursuant to Council's request for further explanation of audit
findings, see attached.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: John Wallin, Finance Director
SUBJECT: Audit findings
DATE: August 2, 1989
In response to the attached Independent Auditors' Report on
Compliance with the Provisions of the Legal Compliance Audit
Guide, the following are the explanations for the non -
compliance:
Finding H-Q_, 1. - Being the Treasurer for the Suburban Rate
Authority, I keep the organization's funds under the City's
tax ID number. The checking and savings for the SRA at
December 31, 1988, were sufficient to put the City over its
collateral limit by about $3,000. Marquette Bank will
increase the collateral pledged so that this will not happen
again.
Findina ND. ?, - Minnesota Statute (M.S. 412.271, subd. 4)
states that when the City cannot defer payment of a claim
until the next council meeting without.forfeiture of discount
privileges, payment may be immediate if at least a majority
of all council members endorse an itemized claim for payment_.
The claim is then acted on formally at the next council
meeting in the same manner as if it had not been paid, and
the earlier payment does not affect the right of the City or
any taxpayer to challenge the validity of the claim.
The Edina Liquor Stores receive about.$50,000 a year in cash
discounts that are due to paying liquor invoices within a
week. The City also is required by the Federal government to
transmit funds for the City's portion of FICA within three
days after payroll.
At least three Council Members would have to come into City
Hall at least once a week to sign claims in order to satisfy
this statute.
Peat Marwick
Certified Public Accountants
Peat Marwick Main & Co.
4200 Norwest Center
90 South Seventh Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Independent Auditors' Report on Compliance with the Provisions
of the Legal Compliance Audit Guide
The City Council
Edina, Minnesota:
We have audited the combined financial statements of the City of Edina, Minne-
sota, as of and for the year ended December 31, 1988, and have issued our
report thereon dated May 12, 1989. Our audit was made in accordance with
generally accepted auditing standards; the provisions of the Legal Compliance
Audit Guide promulgated by the Legal Compliance Task Force pursuant to Minne-
sota Statutes Sec. 6.65. Accordingly, the audit included such tests of the
accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we considered neces-
sary in the circumstances.
The Legal Compliance Audit Guide covers five main categories of compliance to
be tested: contracting and bidding, deposits and investments, conflicts of
interest, public indebtedness, and claims and disbursements. Our study
included all of the listed categories. The results of our tests indicate
that for the items tested, the City of Edina, Minnesota complied with the
material terms and conditions of applicable legal provisions except as
described in the following two paragraphs.
Finding No. 1 - We noted one day during the year when uninsured funds on depo-
sit at a depository designated by council exceeded 90`b of the collateral
assigned to the City (M.S. 118.01, subd. 2).
Finding No. 2 - We noted th
checks) are not signed by a
This relates primarily to
includes other miscellaneous
pated purchases in excess of
of the purchase orders. In
liquor store obligations, ar
Member Firm of
Klvnveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler
it claims paid prior to a council meeting (manual
majority of the council (M.S. 412.271, subd. 4).
payment of liquor store, obligations, but also
manual payments. We note, however, that antici-
$5,000 are approved by council prior to placement
addition, manual checks, exclusive of payments of
approved by the Finance Director before payment.
This report in intended solely for the use of management and the State of
Minnesota and should not be used for any other purpose. This restriction is
not intended to limit the distribution of this report, which is a matter of
public record.
May 12, 1989
NATIONAL CHILDHOOD GRIEF INSTITUTE
For Immediate Release For further information
please contact:
Denise McNaught
Executive Director
(612) 920 -0737
We are pleased to announce the opening of the National Childhood
Grief Institute here in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
In a time of family crisis, parents are usually so absorbed in
their own grief, that they are emotionally or physically
unavailable to their children, subsequently the children become
the "forgotten grievers ". These children sustain tremendous
losses and experience great pain. This challenges a child's
basic sense of security and self esteem.
The National Childhood Grief
organization of its kind for
Institute provides resources
from death of a loved one or
is a national center for the
resources to help children ci
Institute is the first non - profit
children in this country. The
and support for children grieving
parental divorce. The organization
collection and dissemination of
ape with loss and grief.
The "Grieving and Growing" program offers support groups for
children ages 3 to 5 and 6 to 12. The "Grief Relief" program
offers support groups for teens ages 13 to 18. The Grief Inter-
vention Team is available to schools responding to traumatic
events such as student death.
Society is just beginning to recognize how large a role major
loss and unresolved grief play in a child's sense of well being.
The National Childhood Grief Institute is committed to providing
and encouraging-the development of resources and support for all
grieving children.
6200 COLONIAL WAY • EDINA, MINNESOTA 55436
(612) 920 -0737
NATIONAL CHILDHOOD GRIEF INSTITUTE
C H I L D H O O D G R I E F
Grief is difficult for adults to understand and express, and
it is even more difficult for children. Parents, consumed by
their own grief issues, may be unable to provide needed.sup-
port and others, offering comfort and support to the adult,
often overlook the child. These children thus become the
"forgotten grievers ".
1 1/2 million children in the United States lose one or both
parents by death before the age of 15. Countless others are
affected by their own or family members' chronic or terminal
illnesses. 12 million children under the age of 18 are
grieving losses due to parental divorce.
Family changes due to illness, death or divorce can have
great impact on children's emotional health. They can chal-
lenge a child's basic sense of trust, making the world seem
insecure and unsafe.. Children are apt to exhibit aggressive
behavior rather than tears. They may appear sullen, angry or
boisterous rather than sad. Their play may reveal an attempt
to feel power and control over events which create feelings
of helplessness and fear.
Society is just beginning to recognize how large a role major
loss and unresolved grief play in personality disturbances
including anxieties, phobias, alcoholism, depression, suicide
and relationship difficulties.
Children are able to recognize, accept and express feelings
of grief if they are given appropriate opportunities where
they feel loved and secure. They are able to decrease feel-
ings of helplessness and increase feelings of self worth to
grow through the pain of grief developing coping skills for
future transitions and losses.
Communities need to provide education and support to help
children gain honest and accurate information about their
feelings of grief. Adults who work with children need to
be trained to understand the grief process and encourage
the expression of feelings experienced during this time.
6200 COLONIAL WAY • EDINA, MINNESOTA 55436
(612) 920 -0737
NATIONAL CHILDHOOD GRIEF INSTITUTE
DIVORCE: A FAMILY CRISIS
The United States Bureau of Census data indicates that now nearly
one child in three experiences a parental divorce. Projections
based on this data indicates that by the mid- 1990's nearly one
out of every two children will spend part of his or her time
living in a post- divorce household. .'
There is no single pathway to healthy divorce adjustment.
Divorce is a complex process with diverse social psychological,
legal, educational and economic implications. Similarly,
adjustment and adaptation following divorce are part of a complex
process involving family members and professionals.
The period after marital separations and divorce is a time of
vulnerability for both parents and children. Parents
consistently report that in the period following a divorce, their
children have more problems in behavior discipline, learning,
emotional issues and peer relationships. For parents it is a
time to develop new social networks, social roles and resolve or
control the emotions stirred by the marriage dissolution. The
relationship between former spouses must be negotiated to ensure
the emotional and financial support of the children and a
continuing commitment to the children. At an age when children
most need extra help and support from their parents the parents
may be least able to respond because of their own stress level.
Divorce is a lengthy process that affects at differing times a
number of people and relationships. Within the immediate family,
the first change is loss of the couple relationship. This
affects parents and children in varying ways. For example,
research shows that young .boys seem to have greater problems soon
after a divorce while young girls are more likely to have
problems later, during adolescence. Grandparents and other family
members who may "take sides" may aggravate the family's feeling
of anxiety and can heighten conflict. And changes in economic
resources or stability threaten to change family life. It is
estimated that it takes approximately two years for a family to
re- establish itself after a divorce.
After a divorce there are substantial issues for parental
disagreement regarding children, and more seriously, these issues
may become a major route for the couple to continue attempts to
control and frustrate each other. Research suggests the level of
conflict between parents may be more central to the child's post -
divorce adjustment than the disruption caused by the divorce
itself. Continued contact with both parents is beneficial in the
absence of significant conflict between parents, but may add to
problems if parents cannot get along. Poor adjustment by
children is associated with frequent visitation complicated by
6200 COLONIAL WAY • EDINA, MINNESOTA 55436
(612) 920 -0737
significant parental conflict. Conversely, adjustment is often
enhanced by parental harmony.
Early identification and treatment of emotional, behavioral and
learning problems can improve a child's well being and help
prevent more serious difficulties in later life. Children may
experience numerous adjustment difficulties related to the
divorce process, including:
- a sense of guilt and betrayal
- conflicting of divided loyalties
- low self- esteem with related feelings of incompetence
- aggression, hostility or resentment towards parents
- depression, loneliness, sadness, fears
- a confusion about relationships, personal identity and the
future
- decreased concentration and school performance problems
- antisocial "acting out" such a stealing, lying, destruction
of property, and uncooperative or defiant behavior
- increased physical symptoms such as headaches or stomachaches
Children often need a neutral place to work through their
feelings. They benefit from a group format for several reasons.
First, it creates an opportunity for peer support. Second, the
groups provide a sense of "safety through numbers" which
individual approaches cannot achieve. Third, by using a group
format children can be more open than if their parents were
present. Finally, it is simply more efficient to see eight
children at a time. Children are more able in a short time to
become comfortable expressing inner concerns to learn new coping
strategies, and to come to understand the normality of being a
child of divorce when a peer group format is used. It is more
powerful vehicle for preventive intervention.
.N L McMfIj�/ — n e- II9if
{'�4 � Il N �3 ti 'I d� 1,
Comforting the Forgotten Grievers
.'l If-111, �,..'.
111. Itll, NAM'[ 1. l.h I l.N \X'I II.N III.NIJI.
McNaught, executive director of the
National Childhood Grief Institute,
talks about children in mourning. She and
Marge Heegaard, cofounders of the Edina -
based institute, are drawing support from
some Washington, D.C., insiders as they en-
deavor to comfort grief - stricken children.
Susan Baker, the wife of Secretary of State
James Baker, has shown interest in the cause.
So have Joanne Kemp, who is married al
HUD Secretary Jack Kemp, and Marilyn
Quayle, the wife of the Vice President. First
Lady Barbara Bush plans to host a luncheon
next fall to honor the institutes work.
The institute, which was established just
last summer, is the first and only center in
the nation devoted exclusively to educating
people and communities about children and
grief. From offices at the Colonial Church
of Edina, McNaught and Heegaard are
spreading the news that actenrion must be
paid to sociery's "forgotten grievers" —
children who have suffered the heartache of
a death, divorce, or separation.
"in times of family crisis such as death and
divorce, parents are so absorbed in their own
grief that they become emotionally, and
sometimes physically, unavailable to their
children;' says McNaught, an oncology
nurse who has helped many children grieve.
Adults' ignorance of children's emotion-
al needs, and the neglect such ignorance can
lead to, are both tragic, she says. One of the
school principals who has referred children
to the institute's grief support groups wit-
nessed a glaring example. "He said there was
a child who came home from school and
found his father hanging by a rope. The fam-
ily couldn't figure out a year later why he
was having problems at school"
The ways in which children express sor-
row may be confusing to adults, according
to McNaught. "They dori r sustain their grief
like adults do. They grieve intermittencl, On
the ourside they may look like happy, well -
adjusted children. But oftentimes they're
having behavioral problems at school or
decliiring grades. The younger children may
regress, have bedwetting, loss of appetite,
difficulty in sleeping."
Heegaard says that early intervention is
crucial, that children whose grief is not ad-
dressed promptly often carry emotional bur-
dens and low self- esteem into adulthood.
"They also have trouble with relationships
and often avoid getting married; she says.
"They are more likely to become chemical-
ly dependent, because they learn to repress
and deny their feelings:'
Heegaard, an art therapist, is the insti-
tute's program coordinator. The feelings
raised by the death of her husband and then
her child's reaction inspired her to writs
When Someone Very Special Dies, a eom•
ILLUSTRATED BY STANLEY OLSON
bination coloring book and grief survival
manual for kids.
Ito., au,r , Inl,llrn , a1i I alw.n ulrnnlr, ur
,.,1 „1,,, h,,,. 16., 1.•.1. �h. 1.,,.,6 �Il,,,vc
111t11 n, ,unnnunii.nr vnu.Ilh, I Icryaard
>.IV.. "utildren arc naturally right- 11ramcd
until about third or fourth grade. They think
in terms of symbols”
The children s drawings reveal their true
feelings, in spite of whatever masks they
wear to face the world. Moreover, arc ther-
apy also leads children toward verbal ex-
changes with their peers. "They learn it's OK
to talk about their feelings, says McNaught.
"That there are no right or wrong feel -
ings —chat feelings just are"
McNaught tells the story of one little girl
from a support group for children grieving
over divorce who improved dramatically
through art therapy. "She was born with
cerebral palsy, and she believed the reason
her parents divorced was because she was
born with a handicap. The night her father
told her he was leaving, she tried to stand
up and show him that he could stay, that she
could walk. But she fell to the floor."
By the end of the group's sessions, Mc-
Naught says, "she just blossomed. Now she s
on our children's board of directors"
Heegaard's book has been so effective
in support groups at Colonial Church that
it will soon be translated into Khmer, the
Cambodian language, so that it can be
used to help children living in refugee camps
to cope with the extreme emotional trauma
of losing their homes and members of their
families.
As executive director of the grief institute,
McNaught spends much of her time speak-
ing to groups from schools, churches, and
neighborhood organizations. Her prime
purpose, she says, is to encourage others to
start children's grief support groups to serve
their own communities. Another of her
goals is making death a less frightening sub-
ject for adults, so they can comfortably dis-
cuss it with children.
"There are so many natural teaching ex-
periences that we, as parents, could take ad-
vantage of but don t: pointing out flowers
growing from seeds and leaves changing
colors in the fall. The message should be
that death is simply a part of life"
—Peter J. Kirilos
0
MICHAEL P. DUCAR
4616 WOODDALK AVE. . EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
July 19, 1989
Mrs. Michael F. Kelly
22 Circle West
Edina, MN 55435
Dear Peggy:
I will be out of town the week of July 23rd and hence will not be able
to attend the upcoming City Council meeting. Therefore, would it be
possible for you to make the following points before the Council on my
behalf.
There has been a heavy resurgence in Dutch Elm disease this year. It
reflects, according to discussions with one of the major private treatment
companies, the hot dry weather last year. I have lost two trees - the two
Elms on the boulevard in front of my house at 4616 Wooddale. The first was
taken down early this spring when it failed to produce any leaves. The
second has been marked for removal but is still standing. Shortly after my
first tree was removed, I contacted a private tree service about injection
of the second one (this was when it still looked good and had not yet been
marked for removal). They advised me of the questionable status of my
second tree, noted that the tree across the street, at the residence of Mr.
Michael Sitek was infected and that others were probably also diseased.
They pointed out that they felt the City's management of Dutch Elm
disease was not sound - either because of lack of funds or administration
of available funds. They pointed out that it was imperative that the
diseased trees be removed immediately so as to halt the spread of Dutch
Elm. Inability to do so would thwart treatment programs undertaken at
homeowners expense.
For my part, I was dismayed to learn that the City no-longer had a
tree planting program. There was one in years past, but lack of funds has
apparently precluded continuation of it.
There really is no good reason why a tree planting program cannot.be
sponsored by the City. Even with a bare bones plan, it would seem that the
City could negotiate with one or two nurseries to supply a variety of stock
at reduced or wholesale prices. I am not asking for the City to plant
trees at City expense. I am only asking for the City to use its purchasing
power and negotiating experience to obtain a reduced price for trees that
several homeowners in Edina will plant to maintain the appearance and value
of their property.
It is ironic that taxes are increasing sharply at a time when our
stately elms are coming down, clearly- detracting from market value of our
homes.
This letter then Peggy, is an appeal to you and other council members
to prevail upon the City administration to quickly dispatch these diseased
elms and to initiate some sort of program of tree replacement.
Sincerely,
Michael P. Ducar
MPD /gb
cc: Robert Christianson Jr.
Robert J. Kojetin
Kenneth E. Rosland
0
G� PY
Daniel S. Petrosky
7204 Oaklawn Avenue
Edina, Minnesota 55435
City of Edina
Director of Public Works
5146 Eden Avenue
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Sir:
July 15, 1989
There is a problem in this community which demands your immediate
attention. I am referring to the sewage pumping facility at the
intersection of 72nd and Oaklawn. The odors emitted by this facility
have been an annoyance and embarrassment to the residents in this
area for many years, as verified by the enclosed statements.
I have personally lived in this area for over four years. My
level of tolerance reached a peak on July 8. I reported the problem
to the Public Works Department and requested the Edina Police
Department file a nuisance complaint against the city. A public
works employee called me. Be informed me that there were no
chemicals present and the odor in the neighborhood was from RAW
SEWAGE. This employee was concerned about his own health as a result
of some of the previous means used to address this problem. Be
indicated that previous efforts to address this problem were totally
ineffective. The Edina Police Department refused to register my
complaint. At this point I discussed the problem with neighbors
living within one city block of this intersection.
Attached are the names, signatures and comments of local
residents. Collecting this information was an enlightening
experience for me. These people are both irritated and frustrated by
this problem. THIS IS NOT A NEW PROBLEM - IT HAS A TWENTY PLUS
YEAR HISTORY. It has been reported to the Department of Public Works
an uncountable number of times. Most of these people feel that your
department has lied to them concerning your knowledge and the status
of this problem.
One of the most appalling facts is that this facility is located
adjacent to Cornelia Grade School. I have received a number of
verbal comments concerning the presence of odors.in the classroom and
play area. The long term impact to the health of the children in
this area must be given your highest priority.
I have provided copies of this letter and the enclosed statements
to the City Council - Office of the Mayor and the Environmental
Protection Agency. If a satisfactory solution is not reported back
to residents in this area, I will escalate awareness of this problem
to additional state and federal agencies. I will also provide copies
to news media and actively solicit their assistance in correcting
this problem.
Daniel &: Petrosky
REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE
The Edina residents living in the vicinity of 72nd"and Oaklawn
would appreciate immediate action to correct a nuisance and potential
health hazard. The problem is created by the offensive odors of raw
sewage originating from the treatment - pumping facility at this
location. The condition has existed for several years and residents
past and present have individually requested that the problem be
corrected. Individual action has not received sufficient attention to
correct the problem.
- This situation is not only a source of embarrassment to residents,
but can have significant repercussions such as decreased property
value.
- The facility -is located on public school grounds and presents an
unknown health hazard to all students attending Cornelia Grade
School.
- The city must recognize and be willing to accept full
responsibility for potential health problems to city public works
employees resulting from this facility
Copies of the.attached statements will be sent to:
Director of Public Works (original)
Edina City Council
Environmental Protection Agency
The assistance of other agencies and media will be requested if this
situation is not corrected immediately.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: C. _Thorto i 1SC> Address: 7,'Z:)1 o(& &1t'cyn A- ✓e
Phone: 1'iia-7 # Years at this Address: P S
# Years aware of this problem: c.
Comments: g.ac l � s U b L a ucR hle — Ag hA,e- Cfilled Vecp 1!Y
Signature:*
Name- 41. Address: 754;2-/ evaF_ .
Phone: e -41- 11-Z % # Years at this Address: 62 5--
Comments:
.,
# Years aware of this problem: a c/- t
.,
0 - Signature :/�
i 'e �
REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE
The Edina residents.living in the vicinity of 72nd and Oaklawn
would appreciate immediate action to correct a nuisance and potential
health hazard. The problem is created by the offensive odors of raw
sewage originating from the treatment - pumping facility at this
location. The condition has existed for several years and residents
past and present have individually requested that the problem be
corrected. Individual action has not received sufficient attention to
correct the problem.
- This situation is not only a source of embarrassment to residents,
but can have significant repercussions such as decreased property
value.
- The facility is located on public school grounds and presents an
unknown health hazard to all students attending Cornelia Grade
School.
- The city must recognize and be willing to accept full
responsibility for potential health problems to city public works
employees resulting from this facility
Copies of the attached statements will be sent to:
Director of Public Works (original)
Edina City Council
Environmental Protection Agency
The assistance of other agencies and media will be requested if this
situation is not corrected immediately.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Name : � �4�� �J V �G�'l
/����'1
Address: -7 -200 &r/le-11k
'
Phone: &36- -:2 870
#
Years at this Address:
3
# Years aware of this problem:
Comments: -�-'+ Q�ls'��s h 9 4D I/. VR_ P- 1 �9O,.hC-, Y VYGc_1
Signature:
Name: C ; r 1,.) Y-41trx j) Address: or
i
Phone Years at this Address: Ow
# Years aware of this problem: .
Comments:
Signature:
- - - - -- -------------------------------------------------------------
Name: 4L h .� Address : y5"'
Phone: 2 Years-at this Address: Z ��
# Years aware of this problem:
Comments: _
Signature:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: Wo 49 V14 4 IIA Address: Z j o F Oe-- L (,^-. - ..
Phone.: Years at this Address:.
# Years aware of this problem:
Comments:
Signature:
------ - ------------------------------ ---- ---------
Nam Address
Phone: Years at this Address: o�
# Years aware of this problem:
Comments:
Name:
Phone:
------------------------------------------- - �I------ - - - - --
Address:
# Years at this Address: �.
# Years aware of this problem:
Signature:
REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE
The Edina residents living in the vicinity of 72nd and Oaklawn
would appreciate immediate action to correct a nuisance and potential
health hazard. The problem is created by the offensive odors of raw
sewage originating from the treatment - pumping facility at this
location. The condition has existed for several years and residents
past and present have individually requested that the problem be
corrected. Individual action has not received sufficient attention to
correct the problem.
- This situation is not.only a source of embarrassment to residents,
but.can have significant repercussions such as decreased property
value.
- The facility is located on public school grounds and presents an
unknown health hazard to all students attending Cornelia Grade
School.
The city must recognize and be willing to accept full
responsibility for potential health problems to city public works
employees resulting from this facility
Copies of the attached statements will be sent to:
Director of Public Works (original)
Edina City Council
Environmental Protection Agency
The assistance of other agencies and media will be requested if this
situation is not corrected immediately.
--------- - - - - -- - - - - - -- ----------=----------'-/-/-,-----]----------------
Name: Address: �-`�'�� (;dJLo��� ✓z?.�,f�-•
Phone: ��b'7 (0 9 # Years at this Address:
# Years aware of this problem:.
ILI
Name: Address:
Phone: # Years at this Address:
Comments:
# Years aware of this problem:
Signature:
REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE
The Edina residents living in the vicinity of 72nd and Oaklawn
would app .reciate immediate action to correct a .nuisance and potential
health hazard. The problem is created by the offensive odors of raw
sewage originating from the treatment - pumping facility at this
location. The condition has existed for several years and residents
past and present have individually requested that the problem be
corrected. Individual action has not received sufficient attention to
correct the problem.
- This situation is not only a source of embarrassment to residents,
but can have significant repercussions such as decreased property
value.
- The facility is located on public school grounds and presents an
unknown health hazard to all students attending Cornelia Grade
School.
- The city must recognize and be willing to accept full
responsibility for potential health problems to city public works
employees resulting from this facility
Copies of the attached statements will be sent to:
Director of Public Works (original)
Edina City Council
Environmental Protection Agency
The assistance of other agencies and media will be requested if this
situation is not corrected immediately.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: �2 Address:
Phone: # Years at this Address: Z
# Years aware of this problem:
Comments:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Name .
( ,(.cc.✓1
�ie�
Address:
% o� 0 / &
C1L l'-
Phone:
�< l -
76
76
# Years at this
Address:
/ 6-
Comments, 14&0d_y_U
# Years aware of
sUO e-Z_ 'fi gA.
U
�/U !L !t d� c¢� L�- �4•� -�-� Signature:
this problem: 1-;
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Name:
Address:7�0f
L S
Phone:
"J 76 7 V
# Years at this
Address:
Comments:
# Years aware of this problem: /i�
.
� v �
Signature:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: Address: `
/� Phone: Years at this Address:
# Years aware of this problem:,.
Comments: i� ��. L -`: �'o m 411—
\
J
V Signature: 1 r
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Name : Address: OLE (&6 t lj
Phone: �� S7� # Years at this Address: �.
# Years aware of this problem:
Comments : \, LP r /hQ,m,(,� 0 n� 1-y
Signature:C.
--------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
Name:
Phone:
Comments:
Address:
# Years at this Address:
# Years aware of this problem:
Signature:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: ' ` - Sc l Advwk aAU�frdjdrea,5:—'V/4 ��A«�✓ L
Phone: Years at this Address: �b
# Years aware of this problem:
Comments : �•'�. D./l _
P.?
Signature: T
Name: �j ��LL SSEr ( Address: 730 0.411�Al fh4
Phone: S'3� " 5Sb' 1 # Years at this Address:
# Years aware of this problem:
Comments: ,Q S �. �� ice- 4U/4ri .
Signature:
--------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
Name' - Address:
Phone: # Years at this Address:
# Years aware of this problem:
Comments: _
Name:-
Phone:
Comments:
Signature:
Address-
# Years at this Address:
# Years aware of this problem:
Signature:
REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE
The Edina residents living in the vicinity of 72nd and Oaklawn
would appreciate immediate action to correct a nuisance and potential
health hazard. The problem is created by the offensive odors of raw
sewage originating from the treatment- pumping facility at this
location. The condition has existed for several years and residents
past and present have individually requested that the problem be
corrected. Individual action has not received sufficient attention to
correct the problem.
- This situation is not only a source of embarrassment to residents,
but can have significant repercussions such as decreased property
value.
- The facility is located on public school grounds and presents an
unknown health hazard to all students attending Cornelia Grade
School.
- The city must recognize and be willing to accept full
responsibility for- potential health problems to city public works
employees resulting from this facility
Copies of the attached statements will be sent to:
Director of Public Works (original)
Edina City Council
Environmental Protection Agency
The assistance of other agencies and media will be.requested if this
situation is not corrected immediately.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: - Address: 4401 AwmG-4 -Ou've'.
Phone: 9 ,39- CG 3�1 �l # Years at this Address: 3 k ir,5,
# Years aware of this problem: 3 (,�Y,�.
Comments: &fnG J. ter^f'ltl CAC kOS-5 A 0-1 -1-k ,OLO m /2 tv .
WE
/19-4110 --------------------------------
Name: Address:
Phone:
Comments:
# Years at this Address:
# Years aware of this problem:
Signature:
+� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -J- - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-'
Name: �i 1( MN (dtJLC�JS4 Address:
Phone: Years at this Address: ? _.
# Years aware of this problem :_.
Comments:
Signature:
Name: �� Address:
Phone: 4 aI� 4 # Years at this Address:
Comments:
# Years aware of this problem:
'AA „/ /
Signature: 6 C
--------------------------------------------------- - -- ----- ----- - - - - -_
Name: �Q -wQ. -� �.- n,�o�, Address: 7c;7-17
Phone: Years at this Address:
# Years aware of this problem: c2l,/
Sig;afture-:
--------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
Name:
Phone:
Comments:
Address:
# Years at this Address:
# Years aware of this problem:
Signature:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Name Address:130 1
Phone: ��3%-// /off, # Years at this Address: 2.
# Years aware of this problem:
Comments :JAL�
o
Comments:
Address:
# Years at this Address:
#,Years aware of this problem:
Signature:
--------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
Name: Address:
Phone: # Years at this Address:
# Years aware of this problem:
Comments: ,
Signature:
--------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
Name:
Phone:
Comments:
Address:
# Years at this Address:
# Years aware of this problem:
Signature:
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
214572
07/28/89
* * * * **
215K42
07/28/89
* * * * **
219704
07/25/89
219705
07/25/89
219706
07/25/89
219707
07/25/89
219708
07/25/89
219709
07/25/89
219710
07/25/89
219711
07/25/89
219712
07/25/89
219713
07/25/89
219714
07/25/89
219715
07/25/89
219716
07/31/89
219717
07/28/89
219718
07/28/89
219718
07/28/89
219718
07/28/89
CHECK REGISTER
08 -07
-89 PAGE 1
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
# MESSAGE
13.65
STREICHERS
GENERA SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 420 -42
M62873
13.65
* ** -CKS
5,279.28
KOCH MATERIALS CO
OIL
10- 4526 - 314 -30
705669
1106
5,279.28
* (see also 219K42)
* ** -CKS
549.77
OUTPOST HUNT &SPORTS
AMMO FOR GUN RANGE
29- 4572 - 722 -72
5427
2559
549.77
*
168.00
HENN CTY TREES
PERMIT
10- 4310 - 560 756
168.00
*
324.00
VL SERVICES LIGHTING
LAMPS
10- 4504 - 330 -30
1591
324.00
*
27.34
PARAGON ELECT CO
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
2737
27.34
*
340.00
CURRAN V NIELSON CO
CONTRACT SERV
30- 4248 - 782 -78
10998
2781
340.00
*
32.00
PAUL WENZ
REFUND
10- 1145- 000 -00
32.00
*
256.00
ROXANNE SEIDEL
SERVICES
30- 4201 - 781 -78
256.00
*
96.00
ROXANNE SEIDEL
SERVICES
00- 4201 - 781 -78
96.00
*
159.75
VAUGH DISPLAY
SOCCER BANNER
10- 4504 - 621 -62
21333
2819
159.75
*
16.56
REBECCA OLSON
MILEAGE
40- 4208 - 806 -80
16.56
*
118.27
WOODLAKE SANITARY
DUMP BRUSH
10- 4250 - 644 -64
2536
2090
118.27
*
405.50
MIDWEST LANDSCAPING
TREES
60- 1300 - 005 -20
14889
2578
405.50
*
2,019.00
CARLSON TRACTOR
FLAIL MOWER
10 -4901- 650 -64
8723
2478
2,019.00
*
5.00
COMM OF
BOOKS /PAMPHLETS
10- 4502 - 420 -42
75215
5.00
*
223.40
CITYLINE
ADVERTISING
30- 4214 - 781 -78
201
2870
233.40
CITYLINE
ADVERTISING
30- 4214 - 781 -78
201
2870
233.40-
CITYLINE
ADVERTISING
30- 4214 - 781 -78
201
2870
1989 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
08 -07 -89 PAGE 2
CHECK
NO. DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O.
# MESSAGE
223.40
*
219719
07/28/89
270.00
LIZ GEREBI
SKATING INSTRUCTOR
30- 3505 - 000 -00
270.00
*
219720
07/28/89
5.50
STATE OF MINNESOTA
BOOK
10- 4502- 120 -12
5.50
*
?19721
07/28/89
157.50
PERFORMANCE
GENERAL SUPPLIES'
10- 4504 - 420 -42
2552
157.50
*
?19722
07/28/89
12.25
HEDBERG AGGREGATES
GENERAL SUPPLIES'
30- 4504 - 782 -78
41496
1899
12.25
*
?19723
07/28/89
65.52
JO TAYLOR
MILEAGE
10- 4208 - 490 -49
65.52
*
!19724
!19724
08/01/89
07/28/89
3,266.75
4,920.00
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
BLACKTOP
ASPHALT
27- 1300 - 001 -00
54137
1554
8,186.75
*
27- 4522 - 664 -66
54138
1885
* * * -CKS
!19726
07/28/89
855.75
OUTSIDE SERVICE INC
STUMP REMOVAL
10- 4248 - 644 -64
1644
855.75
*
:19727
07/28/89
100.00
MARIA GENNE
PERFORMANCE
30- 4224 - 781 -78
100.00
*
'19728
07/28/89
50.00
DIANA MOORE
PERFORMANCE
30- 4224 - 781 -78
50.00
*
19729
07/28/89
46.00
THE PRINT SHOP.
PRINTING
30- 4600 - 781 -78
86779
2831
46.00
*
19730
19730
07/28/89
08/01/89
80.00
80.00
LUCILE M ROSCHE
LUCILE M ROSCHE
CLEANING
CLEANING
27- 4201 - 662 -66
160.00
*
27- 4201 - 662 -66
19731
07/28/89
360.00
GEORGE WETZEL
REIMBURSEMENT
10- 4156 - 510 -51
360.00
*
19732
07/28/89
360.00
MARC LIMBECK
REIMBURSEMENT
10- 4156 - 510 -51
360.00
*
GERALD DREVLOW
19733
07/28/89
360.00
14RAE04Eo 9 SON
REIMBURSEMENT
10- 4156 - 510 -51
360.00
*
19734
07/28/89
277.21
E KRAEMER & SONS
RIP RAP
40- 4518 - 902 -80
3648
1045
277.21
*
19735
07/28/89
245.00
GROUP HEALTH
AMBULANCE REFUND
10- 3180 - 000 -00
245.00
*
19736
07/28/89
32.80
WILLIAM C HANSEN
REIMBURSEMENT
10- 4206- 440 -44
r..
08 -07 -89 PAGE 3
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
40- 3800 - 000 -00
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
10- 4201- 646 -64
32.80
*
219737
07/28/89
304.80
GITTLEMAN CORP
REFUND
40- 3800 - 000 -00
304.80
*
219738
07/31/89
23.46
STEVE JOHNSON
MEETTING EXDP
2729 2778
30- 4201 - 782 -78
23.46
*
219739
07/31/89
17.00
TERESA LEACH
REFUND
17.00
219740
08/01/89
59.37
LYLE AXT
REIMBURSEMENT
219740
07/31/89
17.97
LYLE AXT
REIMBURSEMENT
77.34
219741
07/31/89
44.16
LOWELL MCCARTHY
MILEAGE
44.16
219742
07/31/89
40.71
JON REISSNER
MILEAGE
40.71
219743
07%31/89
17.00
HOLLY LIESCH
REFUND
17.00
*
219744
07/31/89
34.00
RUTH BOOTH
REFUND
34.00
*
219745
07/31/89
17.00
STAN OLSON
REFUND
17.00
*
219746
07/31/89
46.00
TOSHIE METZGER
REFUND
46.00
*
.219747
08/01/89
9.37
MR ANDERSON
REFUND
9.37
*
219748
08/01/89
17.97
ROBERT LUCK
REFUND
17.97
*
219749
08/01/89
11.07
LAUKKA CONSTRUCTION
REFUND
11.07
*
219750
08/01/89
475.00
DON STODOLAS
WELL ABANDONMENT
_ 475.00
*
219751
08/01/89
495.00
GOOSE GRAPHICS
PARK DESIGN
495.00
*
219752
08/01/89
220.00
MIKE RAWLINS
PRO SERV
220.00
*
219753
08/01/89
3,623.74
PRECISION LANDSCAPE
TREE REMOVAL
3,623.74
*
219754
08/01/89
165.00
WESTERN STATES
LANDSCAPING
r..
08 -07 -89 PAGE 3
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
40- 3800 - 000 -00
10- 4202 - 280 -28
10- 3500 - 000 -00
29- 4624 - 722 -72
29- 4624 - 722 -72
10- 4201 - 646 -64
10- 4201- 646 -64
10- 3500 - 000 -00
10- 3500 - 000 -00
10- 3500 - 000 -00
26- 3415 - 681 -68
40- 3800 - 000 -00
40- 3800 - 000 -00
40- 3800 - 000 -00
11- 4201 - 127 -12
10- 4201 - 627 -62
2729 2778
30- 4201 - 782 -78
10- 4248 - 644 -64
10- 4504 - 643 -64
2746
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
HENN CTY SHERIFF
EQUIP RENTAL
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
EQUIPMENT
JAMES FISCHER
REIMBURSEMENT
165.00
*
219755
08/01/89
2,229.00
ADVERTISING
VFW POST #5632
ADVERTISING
2,229.00
*
219756
08/01/89\,
18.00
SECURITY
MERLE ANDERSON
18.00
*
219757
08/01/89
180.00
TRAINING
BLOCK
OFFICE SUPPLIES
180.00
BOOK
219758
08/01/89
205.70
PRO SERV
KATHY GUSTAFSON
AC MAINTENANCE
205.70
*
219759
08/01/89
320.95
320.95
*
219760
08/01/89
153.20
153.20
*
219761
08/01/89
22.50
219761
08/01/89
22.50
219761
08/01/89
22.50
67.50
*
219762
08/01/89
118.51
118.51
*
219763
08/01/89
315.00
219763
08/01/89
441.00
756.00
219764
08/01/89
95.00
219764
08/01/89
572.97
219765
08/01/89
5.63
5.63
219766
08/01/89
116.13
116.13
219767
08/01/89
29.95
29.95
219768 _
08/01/89
104.80
104.80
219769
08/01/89
110.08
110.08
219770
08/01/89
42.00
42.00
219771
08/01/89
180.00
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
TC MUSICIANS UNION
PRO SERV
HENN CTY SHERIFF
EQUIP RENTAL
BUREAU OF CRIMINAL
TRAINING
RAT OHERRON
EQUIPMENT
JAMES FISCHER
REIMBURSEMENT
RICHARD M LUTZ
REIMBURSEMENT
VFW POST #5632
ADVERTISING
VFW POST #5632
ADVERTISING
VFW POST #5632
ADVERTISING
BRAVO ITALIAN
REFUND
CHASSE SECURITY CORP
SECURITY
CHASSE SECURITY CORP
SECURITY
MERLE ANDERSON
P A E " -„ °.T�
MAIN T
MAE MARTIN
PRIZES
MARYANN HAEMING
TRAINING
BLOCK
OFFICE SUPPLIES
BOARD ROOM CLASSIC
BOOK
TC PICTURE FRAMING
FRAMING
NANCY KNUDSON
PRO SERV
KATHY GUSTAFSON
AC MAINTENANCE
CYD WICKER
AC INSTRUCTOR
08 -07 -89 PAGE 4
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
30- 4201 - 781 -78
10- 4226 - 420 -42
10- 4202 - 440 -44
10- 4901 - 420 -42 195809
10- 4266 - 420 742
10- 4266 - 420 -42
50- 4214 - 822 -82
50- 4214 - 842 -84
50- 4214 - 862 -86
10- 3038 - 000 -00
.27- 4201 - 662 -66
27 -A201- 662 -66
27- 4288 - 667 -66
27- 4600 - 661 -66
10- 4120 - 184 -18
30- 4516 - 781 -78
10- 4502 - 420 -42
27- 4600 - 661 -66
28- 4224 - 701 -70
23- 4201 - 612 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
2557
2515
2625
2843
2635
2652
ob.�
wos
1989. CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
BRIDGET SULLIVAN
AC INSTRUCTOR
180.00 *
219772
08/01/89
102.00
J KANJANAVIVITCH
AC OFFICE
102.00 *
219773
08/01/89
138.00
219773
08/01/89
83.00
219773
08/01/89
104.00
S D SHAUGHNESSY
ART WORK
@25.99
�"
* * * * **
ART WORK
SOLD
219776
08/01/89
48.00
BETH TORSTENSON
ART WORK
48.00
219777
08/01/89
21.00
JENNY CHANG
ART WORK
21.00 *
219778
08/01/89
22.40
BETTY PEDDIE
ART WORK
22.40 *
219779
08/01/89
37.80
M MCDOWELL
AC MAINT
37.80 *
219780
08/01/89
210.00
MOLLIE PAULSON
SERVICES
210.00 *
219781
08/01/89
63.00
MARIAN ALSTAD
AC INSTRUCTOR
63.00 *
219782
08/01/89
50.40
50.40 *
219783
08/01/89
70.00
70.00 *
219784
08/01/89
140.00
140.00 *
219785
08/01/89
110.90
110.90 *
219786
08/01/89
30.00
219786
08/01/89
30.00
60.00 *
219787
08/01/89
87.00
219787
08/01/89
263.64
350.64 *
219788
08/01/89
157.57
219788
08/01/89
300.00
457.57
219789
08/01/89
200.00
v
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
BRIDGET SULLIVAN
AC INSTRUCTOR
,rJ KAN4 NAVIT 'TTGW
AC OFFICE
J KANJANAVIVITCH
AC OFFICE
AC OFFICE
ANN WIDERSTROM
ART WORK
SOLD
JACK WELSH
ART WORK
SOLD
S D SHAUGHNESSY
ART WORK
SOLD
R SORENSON
ART WORK
SOLD
JEAN HAEFELE
ART WORK
SOLD
BETH TORSTENSON
ART WORK
SOLD
LINDA BATDORFF
ART WORK
SOLD
JENNY CHANG
ART WORK
SOLD
SANDA CLARK
ART WORK
SOLD
BETTY PEDDIE
ART WORK
SOLD
M MCDOWELL
AC INSTRUCTOR
M MCDOWELL
AC MAINT
MOLLIE PAULSON
ART WORK
SOLD
MOLLIE PAULSON
SERVICES
MARIAN ALSTAD
ART WORK
SOLD
MARIAN ALSTAD
AC INSTRUCTOR
METRO REFUSE
50TH ST REFUSE
ACCOUNT NO. INV
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4120 - 611 -61
23- 4120 - 611 -61
23- 4120 - 611 -61
23- 3625 - 000 -00
23- 3625 - 000 -00
23- 3625 - 000 -00
23- 3625- 000 -00
23- 3625 - 000 -00
23- 3625 - 000 -00
23- 3625 - 000 -00
23- 3625 - 000 -00
23- 3625 - 000 -00
23- 3625 - 000 -00
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201 - 612 -61
23- 3625- 000 -00
23- 4120 - 613 -61
23- 3625 - 000 -00
23- 4201 - 611 -61
10- 4201 - 395 -30
08 -07 -89 PAGE 5
# P.O. # MESSAGE
KRISTEN HALE
JANE RIFFEY
* * * -CKS
1989 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
08 -07 -89
PAGE 6
CHECK
NO. DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM'DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O.
# MESSAGE
219789
219789
08/01/89
08/01/89
1,486.00
36.00
METRO REFUSE
METRO REFUSE
50TH ST REFUSE
10- 4201 - 395 -30
219789
08/01/89
1,974.00
METRO REFUSE
50TH ST REFUSE
50TH ST REFUSE
10- 4201 - 395 -30
219789
219789
08/01/89
08/01/89
9,968.00
METRO REFUSE
50TH ST REFUSE
10- 4201 - 395 -30
10- 4201 - 395 -30
219789
08/01/89
36.00-
36.00
METRO REFUSE
METRO REFUSE
50TH ST REFUSE
10- 4204 - 395 -30
13,664.00
50TH ST REFUSE
10- 4204 - 395 -30
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219A09
219A09
07/28/89
07/25/89
668.88
704.34
AAA
AAA
CAR REGISTRATION
10- 4310 - 560 -56
1,373.22
TITLE ETC
10- 4310 - 560 -56
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219A21
07/28/89
185.50
ADT SECURITY SYS.
ALARM SERV
30- 4304 - 782 -78
2849
185.50 *
219A22
07/28/89
89.25
89.25 *
AIR COMFORT INC.
LABOR /MATERIAL
10- 4248 - 520 -52
33074
2398
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219A29
219A29
07/25/89
07/31/89
105.30
280.66
ALBINSON
ALBINSON
PAINT FOR FIELD CREW
10- 4504 - 260 -26
569869
8742
219A29
07/25/89
114.83
ALBINSON
SURVEY EQUIP
EQUIPMENT
10- 4504 - 260 -26
571834
8742
500.79
10- 4504 - 260 -26
569881
8742
* * * * **
S
219A41
219A41
07/28/89
07/25/89
74.00
569:86-
AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE
AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE
HOT DOGS
26- 4624 - 683 -68
1699
219A41
07/25/89
569.86
AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE
FOD
FOOD
27- 4624 - 663 -66
'4624-
8919
219A41
219A41
07/25/89
08/01/89
569.86
AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE
F00
27- 663 -66
27-- 4624 - 663 -66
8919
8919
284.67
928.53
AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE
MEAT
27- 4624 - 663 -66
* ** -CKS
219A51
07/28/89
35.00
35.00
AMERICAN RED CROSS
WATER SAFETY
10- 4504 - 625 -62
10662
2845
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219A53
07/28/89
131.06
AMERICAN SHARECOM
TELEPHONE
10- 4256 - 510 -51
131.06
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219A60
07/25/89
427.30
427.30
ANCHOR PAPER
ROLL TOWEL
10- 4514 - 520 -52
2715.
* * * * **
* ** -CKS.
219BO5
07/25/89 -
300.00
BACH -BILL
REIMBURSEMENT
30- 4202 - 781 -78
'r1►
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
BACH -BILL
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
219605
07/28/89
27.40
219B05
07/28/89
6.41
219605
07/28/89
17.16
219805
07/28/89
44.35
219805
07/28/89
21.00
BROS.
INC.
416.32 *
219606
07/25/89
782.00
CARD HOLDER
BERTELSON
782.00 *
* * * * **
GRID PADS
BERTELSON
219609
07/25/89
125.10
219609
07/28/89
190.00
PENCIL SHARPENER
315.10 *
* * * * **
219B13
08/01/89
347.50
219B13
07/31/89
1,052.90
1,400.40 *
* * * * **
219B30
07/31/89
21.95
219B30
07/28/89
100.86
219630
08/01/89
59.68
219630
08/01/89
55.72
219630
08/01/89
69.68
219630
08/01/89
11.92
219830
07/31/89
10.39
219630
07/28/89
15.65
219630
07/28/89
91.90
219630
07/31/89
22.36
460.11
* * * * **
219832
07/31/89
4.84
219832
08/01/89
12.59
219632
07/25/89
3.50
219832
07/28/89
41.25
62.18
* * * * **
219B42
08/01/89
8.33
8.33
* * * * **
219854
07/28/89
31.45
* * * * **
31.45
0
07J
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
BACH -BILL
POSTAGE
BACH -BILL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BACH -BILL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BACH -BILL
OFFICE SUPPLIES
BACH -BILL
SOIL TEST
BACHMANS
8 TREES
BAILEY NURSERIES
VANVALKENBURG PARK
BAILEY NURSERIES
TREES
BARR ENGINEERING GOLF COURSE ENG
BARR ENGINEERING PRO SEV
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
BUDGET SUPPLIES
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
FOLDERS
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
CARD HOLDER
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GRID PADS
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
PENCIL SHARPENER
BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS KEYS
BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS CORE
BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS KEYS
BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS CONTRACT REPAIRS
BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY PHOTOS
BLUMBERG PHOTO SOUND BATTERY
08 -07 -89 PAGE 7
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
30- 4290 - 781 -78
30- 4504 - 781 -78
30- 4504 - 782 -78
30- 4516- 781 -78
30- 4660 - 782 778
10- 4560 - 644 -64 157810 2107
* ** -CKS
60- 1300 - 005 -20 2589
60- 1300 - 005 -20 2734
* ** -CKS
27- 1300 - 003 -00
41- 4201 - 900 -90
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 510 -51
10- 4504 - 510 -51
10- 4504 - 510 -51
10- 4516 - 440 -44
10- 4516 - 440 -44
10- 4516 - 440 -44
10- 4516 - 600 -60
12-4504- 434 -43
12- 4504 - 434 -43
26- 4516 - 681 -68
486185
484442
484456
485700 2511
485996 2512
485906 2511
486186
484442
484449
486186
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 510 -51 94300
10- 4504 - 646 -64 94301 2919
10- 4540 - 540 -54 93778 2467
30- 4248 - 782 -78 94162 2717
* ** -CKS
10- 4508 - 440 -44 104972
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 647 -64 S17215 2848
* ** -CKS
i
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
.CHECK NO.
DATE
219B61
07/28/89
* * * * **
219B77
07/25/89
219B77
07/25/89
219677
07/31/89
219B78
07/31/89
219B78
07/25/89
* * * * **
219B83
07/25/89
219683
07/25/89
* * * * **
219C04
07/25/89
219C04
07/28/89
219C04
08/01/89
219C04
07/31/89
219C04
07/31/89
219C04
.07/25/89
219C05
08/01/89
219C05
08/01/89
219C05
08/01/89
219C05
08/01/89
219C05
08/01/89
* * * * **
219C09
08/01/89
219C09
07/28/89
* * * * **
219C12
08/01/89
* * * * **
219C23
08/01/89
* * * * **
AMOUNT
2,329.70
2,329.70
97.77
195.53
385.55
678.85
12.51
7.23 642
19.74 *T3
81.53
138.17
219.70
375.00
20.00
270.00
38.00
369.00
45.00
1,117.00
32.50
42.10
45.09
42.47
29.04
191.20
392.05
112.25
504.30
17.87
17.87
49.00
49.00
CHECK REGISTER 08 -07 -89 PAGE 8
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
BOUSTEAD ELEC & MFG. CONTRACTED REPAIRS 40- 4248 - 801 -80 262767 2749
BRAUN ENG TESTNG INC
BRAUN ENG TESTNG INC
BRAUN ENG TESTNG INC
BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC.
BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC
BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC
BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC
CAMPBELL SPORTS
CAMPBELL SPORTS
CAMPBELL SPORTS
CAMPBELL SPORTS
CAMPBELL SPORTS
CAMPBELL SPORTS
CAMPBELL -RALPH
CAMPBELL -RALPH
CAMPBELL -RALPH
CAMPBELL -RALPH
CAMPBELL -RALPH
CARLSON PRINTING
CARLSON PRINTING
CORNER MARKING CO
CORE RESTORE
TESTING
TESTING
ENG SERV
CLEANING SUPPLY
CLEANING FLUID
FILL MATERIAL
BALL FIELD AG LIME
T -BALL PENNANTS
TENNIS TROPHYS
TROPHIES
TROPHY
T- SHIRTS
PRINTING
LUNCH MEETING
LUNCH MEETING
LUNCH MEETING
LUNCH MEETING
PHOTO FILM
BUSINESS CARDS
FORMS FORESTRTY
SIGNS
COPIER TONER
60- 1300 - 282 -04
60- 1300 - 284 -04
60- 1300 - 381 -01 17250
10- 4512 - 520 -52 129657 2549
10- 4512 - 520 -52 130005 2549
10- 4504 - 301 -30 5306
10- 4504 - 642 -64 9809
10- 4504 - 621 -62 16309 2817
10- 4504 - 623 -62 17747 2876
10- 4504 - 623 -62 16815 2971
26- 4642 - 681 -68 16838 2908
26- 4642 - 681 -68 16298 2907
27- 4504 - 662 -66 16306 2714
11- 4206 - 434 -43
12 -4206- 434 -43
12- 4206 - 434 -43
12- 4206 - 434 -43
12- 4508 - 434 -43
10- 4504 - 510 -51 45260
10- 4504 - 644 -64 45164 2847
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
27- 4504 - 666 -66 9598 2123
* ** -CKS
27- 4600 - 661 -66 6667 2844
* ** -CKS
08 -07 -89 PAGE 9
ACCOUNT NO. INV..# P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4210 - 140 -14 101727
10- 4210 - 140 -14 101148
30- 4214- 781 -78 102627 2850
* ** -CKS
30- 4288 - 782 -78 114501 2780
* ** -CKS
10- 4258 - 520 -52
10- 4258 - 540 -54
10- 4258 - 540 -54
10- 4258 - 646 -64
50- 4258- 821 -82
50- 4258 - 861 -86
41- 4252 - 900 -90
" * -CKS
27- 4248 - 662 -66 A5665 1753
* ** -CKS
50- 4504 - 821 -82 2800
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 807 -80 2480
* ** -CKS
27- 4562 - 664 -66 2805 2621
27- 4562 - 664 -66 2798 2501
* ** -CKS
30- 4288 - 781 -78 2851 123219
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 600 -60
10- 4208 - 600 -60 N
I
rI
i
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
219C25
07/25/89
119.05
CHAPIN PUBLISHING
CO
AD FOR BIS
219C25
07/25/89
178.20
CHAPIN PUBLISHING
CO
AD FOR BIDS
219C25
07/28/89
49.76
CHAPIN PUBLISHING
CO
ADVERTISING
347.01 *
* * * * **
219C27
07/25/89
74.00
CHEMLAWN
SERVICE CONTRACTS
74.00 *
* * * * **
219C33
07/28/89
248.00
CITY OF EDINA
WATER
219C33
07/28/89
27.10
CITY OF EDINA
WATER
219C33
07/28/89
190.65
CITY OF EDINA
WATER
219C33
07/28/89
27.10
CITY OF EDINA
WATER
219C33
07/28/89
38.75
CITY OF EDINA
WATER
219C33
07/28/89
27.10
CITY OF EDINA
WATER
558.70 *
219C34
07/28/89
203.20
CITY OF RICHFIELD
LIFT STATION
203.20 *
COLLINS ELECTRIC CO.
219642
07/25/89
255.00
G R DVERTIGING
MOVE POLE
255.00
219C46
07/25/89
143.76
COLOR TILE
SUPPLIES
143.76 *
219C78
07/25/89
129.97
CRESCENT ELECTRIC
METER SOCKET
129.97 *
* * * * **
219C99
07/25/89
682.50
C &W TURF
SOD
219C99
07/25/89
945.00
C &W TURF
SOD
1,627.50
* * * * **
219D07
07/28/89
50.09
D. C. HEY CO.
SERVICE CONTRACT
50.09
* * * * **
219D33
08/01/89
766.50
DAVIS- EUGENE
WEED CONTROL
219D33
08/01/89
72.96
DAVIS- EUGENE
MILEAGE
839.46
08 -07 -89 PAGE 9
ACCOUNT NO. INV..# P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4210 - 140 -14 101727
10- 4210 - 140 -14 101148
30- 4214- 781 -78 102627 2850
* ** -CKS
30- 4288 - 782 -78 114501 2780
* ** -CKS
10- 4258 - 520 -52
10- 4258 - 540 -54
10- 4258 - 540 -54
10- 4258 - 646 -64
50- 4258- 821 -82
50- 4258 - 861 -86
41- 4252 - 900 -90
" * -CKS
27- 4248 - 662 -66 A5665 1753
* ** -CKS
50- 4504 - 821 -82 2800
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 807 -80 2480
* ** -CKS
27- 4562 - 664 -66 2805 2621
27- 4562 - 664 -66 2798 2501
* ** -CKS
30- 4288 - 781 -78 2851 123219
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 600 -60
10- 4208 - 600 -60 N
I
rI
i
08 -07 -89 PAGE 10
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
28- 4201 - 702 -70 1648 2804
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 647 -64 88865 2839
10- 4546 - 343 -30 88946 1616
26- 4504 - 682 -68 88769 2842
* ** -CKS
30- 4288 - 782 -78 P19266 2868
* ** -CKS
26- 4642 - 681 -68 9689
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 500 -50
* ** -CKS
10,- 4201 - 420 -42
* ** -CKS
26- 4564 - 682 -68 125570 1056
26- 4564 - 682 -68 542419 1056.
26- 4564- 682 -68 542419 1056
40- 4622 - 805 -80 125484 1670
* ** -CKS
10- 4260 - 510 -51 042232
10- 4260 - 510 -51 043309
* ** -CKS
10- 4290 - 510 -51
* ** -CKS
29- 4248 - 722 -72 95901 2814
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
* * * * **
219E08
08/01/89
210.00
EAGAN CONSTRUCTION
BLACK DIRT
210.00
* * * * **
219E14
07/28/89
403.20
EARL F. ANDERSON
REPAIR PARTS
219E14
07/25/89
647.48
EARL F. ANDERSON
MARKER
219E14
07/28/89
19.26
EARL F. ANDERSON
POOL SIGN
1,069.94 *
* * * * **
219E20
07/28/89
85.00
ECOLAB PEST ELIM.
SERVICE CONTRACTS
85.00 *
* * * * **
219E69
07/28/89
6.95
ELSMORE AQUATIC
BATHING CAPS
6.95
219E75
07/31/89
230.00
EMPLOYEES CLUB
SUPPLIES
230.00 *
* * * * **
219F08
08/01/89
113.00
FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL
PRO SERV
113.00 *
* * * * **
219F11
07/25/89
417.66
FEED RITE CONTROL
CHLORINE
219F11
07/31/89
417.66-
FEED RITE CONTROL
POOL CHEMICALS
219F11
07/31/89
417.66
FEED RITE CONTROL
POOL CHEMICALS
219F11
07/25/89
2,643.44
FEED RITE CONTROL
WATER CHEMICALS
3,061.10
* * * * **
219F56
08/01/89
3,243.00
FRANK B. HALL & CO.
INSURANCE
219F56
08/01/89
3,590.00
FRANK B. HALL & CO.
INSURANCE
6,833.00
219F70
07/28/89
297.00
FRIDEN ALCATEL
POSTAGE METER
297.00
* * * * **
219G20
08/01/89
267.32
GENE SEARS SUPPLY
PARTS
08 -07 -89 PAGE 10
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
28- 4201 - 702 -70 1648 2804
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 647 -64 88865 2839
10- 4546 - 343 -30 88946 1616
26- 4504 - 682 -68 88769 2842
* ** -CKS
30- 4288 - 782 -78 P19266 2868
* ** -CKS
26- 4642 - 681 -68 9689
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 500 -50
* ** -CKS
10,- 4201 - 420 -42
* ** -CKS
26- 4564 - 682 -68 125570 1056
26- 4564 - 682 -68 542419 1056.
26- 4564- 682 -68 542419 1056
40- 4622 - 805 -80 125484 1670
* ** -CKS
10- 4260 - 510 -51 042232
10- 4260 - 510 -51 043309
* ** -CKS
10- 4290 - 510 -51
* ** -CKS
29- 4248 - 722 -72 95901 2814
1989 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
* * * * **
219G24
08/01/89
219G24
08/01/89
219G24
08/01/89
219G24
07/28/89
219G24
07/28/89
* * * * **
08 -07
219G26
07/28/89
219G26
08/01/89
219G26
07/25/89
* * * * **
# MESSAGE
219G68
07/25/89
219G68
07/25/89
219G68
07/25/89
219G68
07/25/89
219G68
07/25/89
219G68
07/28/89
219G68
07/25/89
219G68
07/25/89
219G68
07/25/89
* * * * **
1325
219G79
08/01/89
* * * * **
RADIO SER
219G94
07/25/89
219G94
07/25/89
* * * * **
219G99 08/01/89
* * * * **
219H09 07/28/89
* * * * **
219H23 08/01/89
40
i
-CHECK REGISTER
08 -07
-89
PAGE 11
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O.
# MESSAGE
267.32
* ** -CKS
62.60
GEN. COMMUNICATIONS
RADIO REPAIR
10- 4248 - 440 -44
51715
1325
54.60
GEN. COMMUNICATIONS
RADIO SER
10- 4248 - 440 -44
52229
1325
41.00
GEN. COMMUNICATIONS
RADIO SERV
10- 4248 - 440 -44
52228
1325
27.30
GEN. COMMUNICATIONS
REPAIR WALKIE TALKIE
27- 4248 - 664 -66
49460
2824
j
44.40
GEN. COMMUNICATIONS
REPAIR
27- 4248 - 664 -66
51114
2824
229.90
* ** -CKS
1.93
GENERAL OFFICE PROD
GENERA SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42
19.00
GENERAL OFFICE PROD
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42
5,131.32
GENERAL OFFICE PROD
REMODELING
25- 4924 - 520 -52
1879
5,152.25
* ** -CKS
188.17
GRAYBAR. ELECTRIC CO.
BALLAST
10- 4504 - 520 -52
882080
2596
70.28
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
PARTS
10- 4540 - 440 -44
429591
2401
87.07
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
TAPE
10- 4540 - 540 -54
886822
2688
97.14
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
BALLAST
10- 4540 - 646 -64
877709
2316
95.97
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
SPLICE EQUIP
27- 4540 - 662 -66
888168
2697
1,19.6.15
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
WIRE
40- 4540 - 804 -80
883727
2605
499.55
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
ELEC PARTS
40- 4540 - 807 -80
877322
2477
122.56
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
ELEC PARTS
40- 4540 - 807 -80
880413
2588
140.82
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
BALLAST
50- 4504 - 861 -86
877714
2160
i
2,497.71 *
I
* ** -CKS
5,332.75
GREUPNER -JOE
LESSONS
27- 3417 - 000 -00
5,332.75
* ** -CKS
.17.03
GUSTAVE LARSON CO
AC PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
572016
2331
70.54
GUSTAVE LARSON CO
EXPANSION VALVE
50- 4540 - 840 -84
S72696
2604
87.57 *
* ** -CKS
45.00
GOPHER CASH REGISTER
REPAIR REGISTER
27- 4248 - 666 -66
8991
2973
45.00 *
* ** -CKS
1,490.45
HALLMAN
ENGINE OIL
10- 4618 - 560 -56
46001
2698
1,490.45
!I
* ** -CKS it
60.00
HARRIS HOMEYER CO.
INSURANCE
10- 4260 - 510 -51
Isw
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTI
HARRIS HOMEYER CO. INSURANCE
HARRIS HOMEYER CO. INSURANCE
HARRIS HOMEYER CO. INSURANCE
HENN COUNTY TREAS. JAIL FEES
HENN TECH CENTER HAZMAT TRG
HOFF - WILLIAMSON GENERAL SUPPLIE
HOFFERS INC PAINT
INMAC PENS
INTERIOR COM SYS. TELEPHONE
JERRYS FOODS MOSC
JERRYS LSCAPE MAINT LANDSCAPING
JUSTUS LUMBER BLDG MATERIALS
K & K SALES REMODELING
K & K SALES REMODELING
08 -07 -89 PAGE 12
ON ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4260 - 510 -51
10- 4260 - 510 -51
10- 4260 - 510 -51
* ** -CKS
10- 4286 - 220 -22 20141
* ** -CKS
10- 4202 - 440 -44 018851 2516
* ** -CKS
S 10- 4504 - 420 -42 240999
10- 4563 - 642 -64 68174 2617
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 260 -26 400947 2827
* ** -CKS
30,- 4256 - 782 -78 24327 2869
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 440 -44
* ** -CKS
27- 1325 - 000 -00 6785 2508
* ** -CKS
10- 4504- 646 -64 89692 2004
* ** -CKS
28- 1300 - 000 -00 40961
28- 1300 - 000 -00 40960
* ** -CKS
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
'CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
219H23
08/01/89
5,198.00
219H23
08/01/89
2,196.00
219H23
08/01/89
37,464.80
44,918.80
* * * * **
219H34
08/01/89
1,763.28
1,763.28
* * * * **
219H37
08/01/89
525.00
525.00
* * * * **
219H62
07/28/89
17.03
17.03
219H63
07/28/89
178.50
178.50
219I49
07/28/89
44.83
44.83 *
* * * * **
219I59
07/28/89
93.25
93.25 *
* * * * **
219J27
08/01/89
3.00
3.00 *
* * * * **
219J47
07/25/89
4,999.00
4,999.00 *
* * * * **
219J74
07/25/89
5.50
5.50 *
219K05
08/01/89
131.71
219K05
08/01/89
6,480.00
6,611.71
* * * * **
Isw
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTI
HARRIS HOMEYER CO. INSURANCE
HARRIS HOMEYER CO. INSURANCE
HARRIS HOMEYER CO. INSURANCE
HENN COUNTY TREAS. JAIL FEES
HENN TECH CENTER HAZMAT TRG
HOFF - WILLIAMSON GENERAL SUPPLIE
HOFFERS INC PAINT
INMAC PENS
INTERIOR COM SYS. TELEPHONE
JERRYS FOODS MOSC
JERRYS LSCAPE MAINT LANDSCAPING
JUSTUS LUMBER BLDG MATERIALS
K & K SALES REMODELING
K & K SALES REMODELING
08 -07 -89 PAGE 12
ON ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4260 - 510 -51
10- 4260 - 510 -51
10- 4260 - 510 -51
* ** -CKS
10- 4286 - 220 -22 20141
* ** -CKS
10- 4202 - 440 -44 018851 2516
* ** -CKS
S 10- 4504 - 420 -42 240999
10- 4563 - 642 -64 68174 2617
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 260 -26 400947 2827
* ** -CKS
30,- 4256 - 782 -78 24327 2869
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 440 -44
* ** -CKS
27- 1325 - 000 -00 6785 2508
* ** -CKS
10- 4504- 646 -64 89692 2004
* ** -CKS
28- 1300 - 000 -00 40961
28- 1300 - 000 -00 40960
* ** -CKS
40
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
219K35
07/25/89
219K35
07/25/89
219K35
07/25/89
219K35
07/25/89
219K35
07/25/89
219K35
07/25/89
219K35
07/28/89
* * * * **
KNOX
219K38
08/01/89
* * * * **
219K42
07/31/89
219K42
07/28/89
219K42
07/31/89
219K42
07/31/89
219K42
07/31/89
COMM CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
219L06
07/28/89
219L06
07/28/89
219L06
07/25/89
* * * * **
219L36
07/31/89
* * * * **
MILEAGE
219L42
08/01/89
* * * * **
PRINTING
219L46
08/01/89
* * * * **
219L52
08/01/89
MATERIALS CO
ROAD OIL
219L56
08/01/89
40
08 -07 -89 PAGE 13
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4504 - 325 -30
10- 4504 - 365 -30
10- 4504 - 646 -64
10- 4504 - 646 -64
10- 4540- 440 -44
10- 4540 - 440 -44
27- 4504 - 664 -66
10- 4208 - 160 -16
470082
535810
469994
535959
482977
469928
548716
2458
2465
2586
2457
2493
2808
10- 4526 - 314 -30 708106 1106
10- 4526 - 314 -30 706383 1106
10- 4526 - 314 -30 708904 1106
10- 4526 - 314 -30 708904 1106
10- 4526 - 314 -30 708904 1106
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
15,426.85
MM►
CHECK REGISTER
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
27.65
KNOX
COMM CREDIT
SCREWS
21.29
KNOX
COMM CREDIT
MATERIALS
21.25
KNOX
COMM CREDIT
HARDWARE
69.40
KNOX
COMM CREDIT
HARDWARE
40.99
KNOX
COMM CREDIT
PARTS
21.58
KNOX
COMM CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
99.96
KNOX
COMM CREDIT
POLY FOR PONDS
302.12 *
16.32
KNUTSON
-JIM
MILEAGE
16.32 *
50.00
LEFFLER PRINTING
PRINTING
30- 4600 - 781 -78
(see
also 215K42)
5,172.21
KOCH
MATERIALS CO
ROAD OIL
4,999.25
KOCH
MATERIALS CO
OIL
5,255.39
KOCH
MATERIALS CO
ROAD OILO
5,255.39
KOCH
MATERIALS CO
ROAD OIL
5,255.39-
KOCH
MATERIALS CO
ROAD OILO
08 -07 -89 PAGE 13
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4504 - 325 -30
10- 4504 - 365 -30
10- 4504 - 646 -64
10- 4504 - 646 -64
10- 4540- 440 -44
10- 4540 - 440 -44
27- 4504 - 664 -66
10- 4208 - 160 -16
470082
535810
469994
535959
482977
469928
548716
2458
2465
2586
2457
2493
2808
10- 4526 - 314 -30 708106 1106
10- 4526 - 314 -30 706383 1106
10- 4526 - 314 -30 708904 1106
10- 4526 - 314 -30 708904 1106
10- 4526 - 314 -30 708904 1106
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
15,426.85
* ** -CKS
696.80
LAKE RESTORATION
POND TREATMENT
41- 4128 - 902 -90
3641
2742
743.00
LAKE RESTORATION
LAKE TREATMENT
41- 4128 - 902 -90
3640
2742
280.00
LAKE RESTORATION
WEED CONTROL
41- 4248 - 902 -90
0094
2748
1,719.80
* ** -CKS
50.00
LEFFLER PRINTING
PRINTING
30- 4600 - 781 -78
3540
2902
50.00
* ** -CKS
77.40
LESCO
PARTS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
494016
2826
77.40
*
* ** -CKS
196.75
LIEN INFECTION CON
CLEANING
27- 4201 - 663 -66
196.75
*
* ** -CKS
167.30
LINJO ASSOC
WATER TREATMENT
30- 4564 - 783 -78
12249
2723
167.30
* ** -CKS
42.21
LINHOFF
PHS
10- 4508 - 440 -44
155945
2517
42.21
*
1989 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
08 -07
-89
PAGE 14
CHECK
NO. DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
# MESSAGE
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219L60
08/01/89
2,281.03
LOGIS
DATA PROCESS
10- 4233 - 160 -16
219L60
08/01/89
2,123.36
LOGIS
DATA PROCESS
10- 4233 - 200 -20
219L60
08/01/89
3,095.77
LOGIS
DATA PROCESS
10- 4233 - 420 -42
219L60
08/01/89
1,992..06
LOGIS
DATA PROCESS
40- 4233 - 800 -80
219L60
08/01/89
279.13
LOGIS
DATA PROCESS
50- 4233 - 820 -82
219L60
08/01/89
279.14
LOGIS
DATA PROCESS
50- 4233 - 840 -84
219L60
08/01/89
279.13
LOGIS
DATA PROCESS
50- 4233 - 860 -86
10,329.62
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219L66
08/01/89
6.69
LONG LAKE FORD TRACT
PARTS
27- 4540 - 644 -64
089673
2730
219L66
08/01/89
6.69-
LONG LAKE FORD TRACT
PARTS
27- 4540 - 644 -64
089673
2730
219L66
08/01/89
6.69
LONG LAKE FORD TRACT
PARTS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
089673
2730
6.69
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219M13
07/31/89
855.00
MATT BULLOCK CONST
RENTAL
10- 4248 - 664 -66
8777
'
855.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219M25
08/01/89
93.79
MED OXYGEN & EQUIP
AIR & 02
10- 4274 - 440 -44
1324
93.79
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219M27.
08/01/89
344.35
MERIT SUPPLY
PLASTIC BAGS
10- 4504- 645 -64
22209
2766
219M27
07/25/89
477.50
MERIT SUPPLY
GARBAGE BAGS
10- 4504 - 645 -64
22129
2676
219M27
07/25/89
1,342.50
MERIT SUPPLY
PAINT
10- 4540 - 540 -54
22109
2583
219M27
08/01/89
470.50
MERIT SUPPLY
WEED SPRAY
10- 4566 - 643 -64
22232
2881
219M27
08/01/89
149.10
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
28- 4504 - 702 -70
22095
2564
219M27
07/31/89
498.50
MERIT SUPPLY °
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
22189
2779
219M27
08/01/89
496.40
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
22215
2879
219M27
07/28/89
471.05
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
30- 4512 - 782 -78
22156
2725
219M27
07/25/89
449.00
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
30- 4512 - 782 -78
22124
2662
4,698.90
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219M31
08/01/89
28.90
METRO FONE COMM.
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
313041
28.90
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
21SM35
07/25/89
220,257.78
METRO WASTE CONTROL
SEWER CHARGES
40- 4312 - 812 -80
6944
220,257.78
* ** -CKS
219M42
07/28/89
745.56
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
10- 4524 - 301 -30
1793
1103
`w.
CHECK REGISTER
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
ITEM DESCRIPTION
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
219M42
07/28/89
10,472.59
METZ BAKING CO
BREAD
11,218.15
* * * * **
MILLER- DUNWIDDIE
SERVICES
219M44
07/28/89
330.30
CAR PHONE
MN. CELLULAR TEL.
330.30
* * * * **
LEGAL PUBLICATION
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
219M46
07/31/89
44.48
219M46
07/25/89
209.74
219M46
08/01/89
204.10
-MN. TRGE)r€R
WELDING FOR POOL
458.32 *
* * * * **
MOTOROLA
RADIOS
219M57
07/25/89
7,471.64
7,471.64 *
* * * * **
219M68
07/28/89
70.44
219M68
07/28/89
197.42
219M68
07/28/89
267.81
535.67
219M80
07/25/89
204.78
219M80
07/28/89
33.29
238.07
219M81
08/01/89
107.51
219M81
07/28/89
128.72
219M81
07/28/89
15.0.27
386.50
- r- s9MB2
07/28/89
22.50
22.50
* * * * **
219M92
08/01/89
17.90
17.90 *
219M93
08/01/89
1,515.00
1,515.00 *
* * * * **
219M97'
07/25/89
7,933.60
7,933.60
* * * * **
`w.
08 -07 -89 PAGE 15 j
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
j
10- 4524 - 314 -30 1793 1103
i
* ** -CKS
I
10- 4514 - 520 -52 25073 2450
* ** -CKS
26- 4624 - 683 -68
27- 4624 - 663 -66
27- 4624- 663 -66
* ** -CKS
60- 1300 - 015 -20 8859 2729
* ** -CKS
10- 4204 - 100 -10
10- 4204 - 140 -14
10- 4226 - 420 -42
I
* ** -CKS
i
10- 4210 - 140 -14
10- 4210 - 140 -14
27- 4540 - 664 -66 772916 2753
27- 4540 - 664 -66 771913 2795
27- 4540 - 664 -66 771816 2713
I
10- 4248 - 646 -64 072929 2856
* ** -CKS
50- 4516 - 860 786 996254
10- 4901 - 440 -44 581620 1253
* ** -CKS
40- 4640 - 803 -80 I
* ** -CKS
I
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
MIDWEST CHEM SUPPLY
TOWELS
METZ BAKING CO
CONCESSIONS
METZ BAKING CO
BREAD
METZ BAKING CO
BREAD
MILLER- DUNWIDDIE
SERVICES
MN. CELLULAR TEL.
CAR PHONE
MN. CELLULAR TEL.
CAR PHONE
MN. CELLULAR TEL.
RENTAL
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
LEGAL PUBLICATION
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
LEGAL PUBLICATION
MN. TORO INC.
IRRIGATION PARTS
MN. TORO INC.
MOWER PARTS
MN. TORO INC.
IRRIGATION PARTS
MN WANNER CO.
-MN. TRGE)r€R
WELDING FOR POOL
MONARCH MARKETING
SUPPLIES
MOTOROLA
RADIOS
MPLS FINANCE DEPT.
WATER PURCHASED
08 -07 -89 PAGE 15 j
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
j
10- 4524 - 314 -30 1793 1103
i
* ** -CKS
I
10- 4514 - 520 -52 25073 2450
* ** -CKS
26- 4624 - 683 -68
27- 4624 - 663 -66
27- 4624- 663 -66
* ** -CKS
60- 1300 - 015 -20 8859 2729
* ** -CKS
10- 4204 - 100 -10
10- 4204 - 140 -14
10- 4226 - 420 -42
I
* ** -CKS
i
10- 4210 - 140 -14
10- 4210 - 140 -14
27- 4540 - 664 -66 772916 2753
27- 4540 - 664 -66 771913 2795
27- 4540 - 664 -66 771816 2713
I
10- 4248 - 646 -64 072929 2856
* ** -CKS
50- 4516 - 860 786 996254
10- 4901 - 440 -44 581620 1253
* ** -CKS
40- 4640 - 803 -80 I
* ** -CKS
I
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
08 -07 -89
PAGE 16
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O.
#
MESSAGE
219N13
07/28/89
43.45
MUZAK
ADVERTISING
50- 4214 - 822 -82
219N13
07/28/89
43.45
MUZAK
ADVERTISING
50- 4214 - 862 -86
86.90 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219N22
08/01/89
233.63
NATL GUARDIAN SYS.
ALARM SERV
50- 4304 - 841 -84
132598
233.63 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219N31
07/31/89
57.70
NEBCO DISTRIBUTING
CONCESSIONS
26- 4624 - 683 -68
010170
9746
219N31
07/31/89
10.65C-
NEBCO DISTRIBUTING
CONCESSIONS
26- 4624 - 683 -68
010289
9746
• :2 1 QNR�_g7•�1
.0o
IA . B6
NE$GA -B R- IBUT-ING GONGESSIGNS
26 4, 6- 2- 4- 6$3- 6$-- 0- 10- 2- 8- 9- 9-7 -46
219N31
07/25/89
23.70
NEBCO DISTRIBUTING
PRETZELS
26- 4624 - 683 -68
9847
9746
-2-"N9!
w"21� 8 9
i 9 -•6 5
-NE BGQ P1S-T�R4BU-T-1-Nv ®NG- E- S- SI-096
' 46- 4- 6-8.3— f8--0- 02-8 9-9-7-46
-
70.75*
* * * **
* ** -CKS
219N50
07/25/89
69.27
NO STAR WATERWORKS
REPAIR CAPS
40- 4540 - 803 -80
31924
1982
69.27
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219017
07/28/89
73.60
OFFICE PRODUCTS
SERV CONTRACTS
10- 4288 - 510 -51
086041
2836
219017
07/25/89
23.00
OFFICE PRODUCTS
PRINTER CABLE
10- 4504 - 440 -44
085447
2639
96.60
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219024
08/01/89
189.50
OFFSET PRINTING
PRINTING
10- 4600 - 420 -42
30105
2627
189.50
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219050
07/28/89
75.00
OWENS SERVICE CO
SERV CONTRACT
30- 4288 - 782 -78
39129
2798
75.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219P05
07/25/89
595.00
PAPER CALMENSON
CORNERS FO RNEW RINK
10- 4640 - 646 -64
1939
595.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219P31
07/28/89
750.00
PETER COTTON
EDUCATION
10- 4202 - 440 -44
750.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219P48
07/28/89
22.10
PIP PRINTING
PRINTING
30- 4600 - 781 -78
5128
2838
22.10
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK
REGISTER
08 -07
-89
PAGE 17
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O.
# MESSAGE
219P58
07/28/89
65.00
PLUNKETTS
EXTERMINATION
10- 4201- 647 -64
S31956
2877
219P58
07/28/89
75.00
PLUNKETTS
EXTERMINATION
10- 4201- 647 -64
S31957
2878
140.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219P62
07/28/89
11,389.00
POLAR CHEVROLET
VAN
10- 4901 - 260 -26
251715
1202
219P62
07/28/89
11,623.00
POLAR CHEVROLET
1/2 TON TRUCK
27- 1340 - 000 -00
122896
23,012.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219P64
07/28/89
1,875.00
POMMER CO. INC.
PLAQUES
10- 4504 - 100 -10
019001
2816
219P64
08/01/89
106.80
POMMER CO. INC.
AWARDS
27- 4600 - 661 -66
18984
2541
219P64
07/25/89
61.17
POMMER CO. INC.
ENGRAVING
29- 4504 - 722 -72
19101
2809
2,042.97
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219Q22
08/01/89
90.90
QUIK PRINT
NEWSLETTER
27- 4600 - 661 -66
17136
2906
90.90
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219R01
08/01/89
65.55
R & R SPECIALTIES
REPAIR
28- 4248 - 702 -70
11003
2771
65.55
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219R12
07/25/89
63.85
RADIO SHACK
ANSWERING MACH
10- 4540 - 646 -64
001146
2464
219R12
07/25/89
18.55
RADIO SHACK
ELECT PARTS
20- 4540 - 646 -64
001338
2558
82.40
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219R22
07/31/89
450.50
REM SUPPLIES
FERTILIZER
30- 4588 - 783 -78
2901
450.50
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219R31
07/28/89
166.82
RETAIL DATA SYS
MN
RIBBONS
50- 4248 - 841 -84
37660
166.82
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219R35
07/25/89
106.10
RICHFIELD PLUMB
CO
REPAIR TOILET
26- 4201 - 682 -68
5741
106.10
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219R79
08/01/89
233.16
RTW INC.
FEE FOR SERV
10- 4260 - 510 -51
233.16
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
ii
i
1989 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
08 -07
-89 PAGE 18
CHECK
NO. DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INV. # P.O.
# MESSAGE
219501
07/25/89
94.07
S.H. BARTLETT CO
HARDWARE
10- 4504 - 646 -64
27388
2614
94.07
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219508
07/25/89
112.30
SAYLORS SOFTWARE 1ST
COMPUTER SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
25695
2654
112.30
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219534
07/25/89
111.74
SOUTHDALE FORD
BODY WORK
10- 4248 - 560 -56
10639
219534
07/25/89
21.14
SOUTHDALE FORD
FILTER
10- 4540 - 560 -56
211567
219S34
07/25/89
59.54
SOUTHDALE FORD
KEYS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
210438
219534
07/25/89
152.22
SOUTHDALE FORD
GAS TANK
10- 4540 - 560 -56
212909
219S34
07/25/89
10.76
SOUTHDALE FORD
FILTER
10- 4540 - 560 -56
211337
219534
07/25/89
45.74
SOUTHDALE FORD
ADAPTER
10- 4540 - 560 -56
211479
219534
07/25/89
18.12
SOUTHDALE FORD
GASKET
10- 4540 - 560 -56
210768
219534
07/25/89
267.70
SOUTHDALE FORD
FUEL PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
211042
219534
07/25/89
37.48
SOUTHDALE .FORD
SPEED KEY
10- 4540 - 560 -56
211713
724.44
*.
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219537
07/28/89
123.65
SOUTHTOWN MN FABRICS
FABRIC
10- 4504 - 647 -64
169398
2719
219537
07/28/89
147.86
SOUTHTOWN MN FABRICS
FABRIC
10- 4504 - 647 -64
169400
2719
271.51
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219554
07/25/89
120.65
STAR TRIBUNE
HELP WANTED ADS
104212-510-51
219554
08/01/89
279.40
STAR TRIBUNE
HELP WANTED ADS
10- 4212 - 510 -51
400.05
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219556
07/25/89
35.78
STARK ELECTRONICS
BATTERY
10- 4540 - 520 -52
2686
35.78
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS.
219567
07/28/89
3,125.00
STORE FRONT
HUMAN SERVICES
10- 4201 - 504 -50
112308
3,125.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219577
07/25/89
100.00
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
ENGINE REPAIR
10- 4248 - 560 - 56.83543
219577
07/25/89
30.00
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
110415
219577
07/25/89
32.60
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
COIL ASSY
10- 4540 - 560 -56
110962
162.60
*
219578
07/25/89
40.90
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
PLBG SUPPLIES
10- 4540 - 646 -64
2703
40.90
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
�,'.a':� -. rx +w',. .Fu .S•m,�''yp.- ,.c�•'•Si� ! �) .w�,�p w <�..n. � ry ,;: < -, _'.. ^.., i ;a:..,-; r r:,.,;•.y�.r Yuic�ien"5c..y'urin,Gny�sr, a;, .,.,....: ..-
� '_�ity5'i}+I ic^-N '4. "- "'y.y •'•+rt �it'4T'K' 1.:: kA�r� ?�1_YJ. V1 ""lei .h� •l ,". Y ...
..
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
08 -07
-89
PAGE 19
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O.
# MESSAGE
219580
07/28/89
1,750.00
SUBURBAN RATE
DUES
10- 4201 - 506 -50
1,750.00
* ** -CKS
* * * * **
219586
07/28/89
20.45
SUPRA COLOR LABS
PHOTO SUPPLIES
10- 4508 - 420 -42
220527
20.45
* ** -CKS
* * * * **
219596
07/25/89
80.00
SCHUENEMAN -AMY
CLEANING
27- 4201 - 662 -66
219596
08/01/89
80.00
SCHUENEMAN -AMY
CLEANING
27- 4201 - 662 -66
160.00
* ** -CKS
* * * * **
219T10
08/01/89
360.50
TERRY ANN SALES CO.
TERRY ANN SALES CO.
CUPS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 663 -66
27- 4504 - 663 -66
12484
12483
2910
2855
219T10
08/01/89
249.30
609.80
219T11
07/25/89
53.33
TESSMAN SEED & CHEM.
TESSMAN SEED & CHEM.
TREE FOOD
FERTILIZER
10- 4558 - 644 -64
30- 4558- 783 -78
28410
29393
2471
2572
219T11
07/28/89
29.70
83.03
* ** -CKS
* * * * **
219T13
08/01/89
2,145.00
TOM HORWATH
FORESTRY
MILEAGE
10- 4201 - 644 -64
10- 4208 - 600 -60
219T13
08/01/89
190.08
TOM HORWATH
2,335.08
* ** -CKS
* * * * **
219T38
07/28/89
2,594.00
TOIVONEN PAINTING
PAINTING
60- 1300 - 014 -20
2147
2,594.00
* ** -CKS
* * * * **
219T42
07/25/89
30.74
TOOLS BY OLSEN
TOOLS
10- 4580 - 646 -64
19150
2702
219T42
07/28/89
41.90
TOOLS BY OLSEN
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
19204
2801
72.64 *
* ** -CKS
* * * * **
219T53
07/25/89
4,480.03
TRACY OIL
GASOLINE
10- 4612- 560 -56
T11457
2611
4,480.03 * .
* ** -CKS
* * * * **
219T74
08/01/89
228.00
TURF SUPPLY CO.
CHEMICALS
27- 4564 - 664 -66
027277
2844
219T74
08/01/89
228.00
228 00-
TURF SUPPLY CO.
TURF SUPPLY CO
CHEMICALS
CHEMICALS
28- 4564- 664 -66
28- 4564 - 664 -66
027277
027277
2844
2844
219T74 08/01/89
228.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
AMOUNT
633.05
192.80
185.80
45.00
1,056.65 *
316.11
80.24
396.35 *
40.50
40.50 *
462.25
468.00
930.25 *
108.00
108.00 *
56.40
253.80.
108.75
176.13
595.08 *
55.11
91.45
146.56 *
62.16
62.16 *
498.37
498.37 *
480.24
480.24 *
CHECK REG =STER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM
UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLWANCE
UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORMS
UNIFORM UNLIMITED MAINT
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP FIXTURES
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP CIRCUIT BREAKER
ME
08 -07 -89 PAGE 20
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4266 - 420 -42
10- 4266 - 430 -42
10- 4266 - 440 -44 16964 2518
10- 4274 - 420 -42
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 540 -54 2598
40- 4540 - 807 -80 2489
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
219U08
08/01/89
219U08
08/01/89
219U08
08/01/89
219U08
08/01/89
* * * * **
219U14
07/25/89
219U14
07/25/89
* * * * **
267153
219U30
08/01/89
* * * * **
CUPS
219V15
07/25/89
219V15
08/01/89
219V30
07/28/89
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
219V80
07/25/89
219V80
07/25/89
219V80
07/25/89
219V80
07/25/89
* * * * **
219W08
07/28/89
219W08
07/25/89
* * * * **
253100
219W10
07/28/89
219WIl
08/01/89
* * * * **
252761
219W41
07/28/89
AMOUNT
633.05
192.80
185.80
45.00
1,056.65 *
316.11
80.24
396.35 *
40.50
40.50 *
462.25
468.00
930.25 *
108.00
108.00 *
56.40
253.80.
108.75
176.13
595.08 *
55.11
91.45
146.56 *
62.16
62.16 *
498.37
498.37 *
480.24
480.24 *
CHECK REG =STER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM
UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLWANCE
UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORMS
UNIFORM UNLIMITED MAINT
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP FIXTURES
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP CIRCUIT BREAKER
ME
08 -07 -89 PAGE 20
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4266 - 420 -42
10- 4266 - 430 -42
10- 4266 - 440 -44 16964 2518
10- 4274 - 420 -42
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 540 -54 2598
40- 4540 - 807 -80 2489
* ** -CKS
W.W. GRAINGER TOOLS 10- 4580 - 646 -64 2755
W.W. GRAINGER FIXTURE 23- 4504 - 611 -61 2674
e
* ** -CKS
WALKER - MERWIN MILEAGE 27- 4208 - 661 -66
W. GORDON SMITH GASOLINE 27- 4612- 664 -66 1484 2799
* ** -CKS
WEST PHOTO PHOTO SUPPLIES 10- 4508 - 420 -42 23306 2644
* ** -CKS
US WEST PAGING
TELEPHONE
30- 4256 - 782 -78
2965
* ** -CKS
VAN PAPER CO.
SUPPLIES
10- 4514 - 520 -52
267153
2794
VAN PAPER CO.
CUPS
27- 4504 - 663 -66
268122
2840
* ** -CKS
VANTAGE ELECTRIC
REPAIRS
30- 4248 - 782 -78
010743
2832
* ** -CKS
VOSS ELECTRIC SUP
LAMPS
10- 4504 - 540 -54
253100
2597
VOSS ELECTRIC SUP
PARTS
10- 4540 - 375 -30
252761
2409
VOSS ELECTRIC SUP
LAMPS
23- 4504 - 611 -61
253289
2625
VOSS ELECTRIC SUP
LAMPS
40- 4504 - 804 -80
253168
7923
* ** -CKS
W.W. GRAINGER TOOLS 10- 4580 - 646 -64 2755
W.W. GRAINGER FIXTURE 23- 4504 - 611 -61 2674
e
* ** -CKS
WALKER - MERWIN MILEAGE 27- 4208 - 661 -66
W. GORDON SMITH GASOLINE 27- 4612- 664 -66 1484 2799
* ** -CKS
WEST PHOTO PHOTO SUPPLIES 10- 4508 - 420 -42 23306 2644
08 -07 -89 PAGE 21
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
10- 4248 - 440 -44 19595 2136
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 560 -56
10- 4504 - 560 -56
40- 4504 - 801 -80
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 627 -62 010725
* ** -CKS
30- 4642 - 781 -78 2920
* ** -CKS
10- 4504- 160 -16 0628 1952
* ** -CKS
m i I
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
* * * * **
219W49
08/01/89
2,595.00
WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT
TANK
2,595.00
* * * * **
219W66
07/25/89
19.29
WILLIAMS STEEL
BROOM
219W66
07/25/89
71.76
WILLIAMS STEEL
PAINT
219W66
07/25/89
75.61
WILLIAMS STEEL
PAINT
166.66
* * * * **
219W71
07/28/89
1,704.75
WINFIELD DEVEL.
RENT
1,704.75
* * * * **
219Z05
08/01/89
127.30 '1?7
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
SAFETY EQUIP
127.30*
* * * * **
219218
07/25/89
50.45
ZIP PRINTING
BUDGET SHEETS
50.45
171,536.74'
171,5@5.2@-
FUND 10 TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
475.00
FUND 11 TOTAL
C.D.B.G.
298.75
FUND 12 TOTAL
COMMUNICATIONS
2,490.91
FUND 23 TOTAL
ART CENTER
5,131.32
FUND 25 TOTAL
CAPITAL FUND
1 214.56
',^�
FUND 26 TOTAL
SWIMMING POOL FUND
38,686.41
FUND 27 TOTAL
GOLF COURSE FUND
7,146.44
FUND 28 TOTAL
RECREATION CENTER FUND
955.60
FUND 29 TOTAL
GUN RANGE FUND
7,939.30
-gym-
FUND 30 TOTAL
EDINBOROUGH PARK
238,013.07
FUND 40 TOTAL
UTILITY FUND
2,975.90
FUND 41 TOTAL
STORM SEWER UTILITY
1,831.12
FUND 50 TOTAL
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
11,465.09
FUND 60 TOTAL
CONSTRUCTION FUND
490,160.21
TOTAL
08 -07 -89 PAGE 21
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
10- 4248 - 440 -44 19595 2136
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 560 -56
10- 4504 - 560 -56
40- 4504 - 801 -80
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 627 -62 010725
* ** -CKS
30- 4642 - 781 -78 2920
* ** -CKS
10- 4504- 160 -16 0628 1952
* ** -CKS
m i I