Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-09-05_COUNCIL PACKETr AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 5, 1989 7:00 P.M. (Convene Joint HRA /Council Meeting) ROLLCALL I. APPROVAL OF HRA MINUTES OF JULY 24, 1989 AND JOINT HRA /COUNCIL MINUTES OF AUGUST 7, 1989 II. EDINA HOMESTEAD DEVELOPMENT - RPI SERVICES (Contd from 8/7/89) (Continue Indefinitely) A. Final Rezoning PRD -4, Planned Residence District to PSR -4, Senior Citizen District (Council) B. Final. Plat Approval - Outlot A, Ebenezer Society 1st Addition (Council) C. Tax Increment Financing Assistance (HRA) III. AWARD OF BIDS - Centennial Lakes - Phase I - Residential Amenities (HRA) IV. CENTENNIAL LAKES - PHASE IV - DISCUSSION V. ADJOURNMENT OF HRA EDINA CITY COUNCIL. PROCLAMATION - YMCA YOUTH FITNESS WEEK I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Council member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will bg' removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. * II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of Regular Minutes of July 24 and August 7, 1989 III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Appeal from Board of Appeals Decision - Fence Height Variance - John Kalachnik - 4114 Morningside Road * B. Set Hearing Date (10/2/89) 1. Amendments to Subdivision and'Zoning Ordinances IV. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS V. AWARD OF BIDS * A. Reconstruction of Countryside Park Basketball Courts Agenda Edina City Council September 5, 1989. Page Two VI. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. White Oaks Lots Status Report B. Grand View Park Cemetery Report C. Appointment - Community Development and Planning Commission * D. Recycling Agreement - Hennepin County - 1989 Rebate E. Approval of Storm Sewer Projects - Various Locations * F. Set Hearing Date - On -Sale Wine License Fees (10/2/89) VII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES A. Metropolitan Transit Commission Appointments VIII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL IX. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS X. FINANCE A. Management Summary - Enterprise Funds * B. 1990 Budget - Set Hearing Dates (10/2/89 & 10/16/89) * C. Bond Refunding - Set Hearing Date (10/2/89) * D. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 9/5/89: General Fund $172,493.29, C.D.B.G. $485.00, Communications $837.69, Art Center $7,801.60, Swimming Pool Fund $1,067.63, Golf Course Fund $17,550.76, Recreation Center Fund $1,117.15, Gun Range Fund $616.29, Edinborough Park $9,868.05, Utility Fund $254,553.23, Storm Sewer Utility $8,421.69, Liquor Dispensary Fund $5,188.71, Construction Fund $77,114.60, Total $557,115.69 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Mon Sept 18 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Mon Oct 2 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Mon Oct 16 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room r MINUTES EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JULY 24, 1989 Answering rollcall were Commissioners Rice, Smith, and Richards. MINUTES of the Joint HRA /Council Meeting of May 15, 1989 were approved as submitted by motion of Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Rice. Ayes: Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. Commissioners Kelly and Paulus entered the meeting at this point. EXCESS TAX INCREMENT REVENUE REBATE REQUEST OF SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTINUED TO 8/21/89 Manager Rosland presented the request of the Edina School District concerning rebate of the excess tax increment from the Grandview and 50th /France Tax Increment Districts. As noted in the resolution of the School Board, the voters of the School District authorized an additional levy in October, 1988. This additional levy resulted in a higher mill rate (i.e. tax capacity rate) within these tax increment districts. This increase produced a tax increment windfall for these two districts in -the amount of $49,060 for payable 1989 taxes. The School Board has advised that the 1988 amendments to the Tax Increment Financing Act (Act) include a provision whereby cities can rebate to school districts the excess tax increment generated by a referendum levy. According to the Act, the City may elect to rebate such excess increment but is not obligated to do so. Based on these facts and circumstances, the School District requests that the City authorize the rebate of the excess increment to,start with the 1989 tax increments and continue annually thereafter. Due to ongoing changes in tax increment financing laws, staff would recommend that the rebate be authorized for the payable 1989 tax increment only, and that this resolution be reviewed and considered annually in regard to future payments of excess increment. It is also recommended that the amount of the rebate should be conditioned on the collection of at least 95% of the taxes from each district, i.e. no more than a 5% delinquency rate of total tax revenue. Manager Rosland suggested that action on this matter be held for a month to be sure that there truly are excess increments. Mayor Richards said it might be helpful, as the City deals with the issue of tax increment financing for those districts, for two elected officials to meet with representatives of the School Board to discuss this as a policy issue. Notion was made by Commissioner Smith and was 'seconded by Commissioner Kelly that the School Board's request for rebate of excess tag increment revenue be continued to August 21, 1989. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED APPROVING PLANS AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR CENTENNIAL LAKES PHASE I - LAKE CONSTRUCTION. PARKING LOT AND STORM SEWER Engineer Fran Hoffman explained that the Centennial Lakes Phase I project would include the central pond construction consisting of placing a liner on the bottom of the pond and construction of a concrete retaining wall running along the west side. The estimated cost is $564,000 and will be funded by the HRA and the developers. The second part of the project is construction of the storm sewer and parking lots for buildings 1, 2 and 3 of the residential development. The estimated cost is $70,000 and will be funded by the HRA. Staff would recommend authorization of the projects and that bids be taken. Commissioner Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR -BIDS FOR CENTENNIAL LAKES PHASE 1 - LAKE CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NO. PL1 (HRA) BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA: 1. The plans and specifications for the proposed improvements set forth in the following Advertisement for Bids form, heretofore prepared by the City Engineer and now on file in the office of the City Clerk are hereby approved. 2. The Clerk shall cause to be published in the Edina Sun - Current and Construction Bulletin the following notice of bids for improvements: (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 4801 W. 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS CENTENNIAL LAKES PHASE 1 - LAKE CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NO. PL1 (HRA) BIDS CLOSE AUGUST 4, 1989 SEALED BIDS will be received and opened in the Council Chambers in Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street at 11:00 A.M., Friday, August 4, 1989. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) will meet at 7:00 P.M., Monday, August 7, 1989, to consider said bids. Estimated size is as follows: Pond Liner 100,000 S.F. Concrete Retaining Wall 1,900 L.F. Boulder Riprap 69600 S.F. All in accordance with Plans and Specifications prepared by the Engineer, BRW, Inc. and available at the office of the consulting engineer, 700 Third Street South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415, and on file with the Executive Director. Plans and Specifications incorporating the work for the projects may be examined at the City Hall and at the office of BRW, Inc. COPIES may be obtained from BRW, Inc., upon deposit of $25.00 for each set, all of which deposit will be refunded to each planholder who returns the Plans and Specifications in good condition to the consulting engineer within ten (10) days after the date of opening bids. Bids shall be in a sealed envelope with a statement thereon showing the work covered by the bid. Bids should be addressed to the Executive Director, City of Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424, and may be mailed or submitted personally to the Executive Director. Bids received by the Executive Director, either through the or by personal submission, after the time set for receiving them may be returned unopened. Work must be done as described in plans and specifications on file in the office of the Executive Director. No bids will be considered unless sealed and accompanied by bid bond or certified check payable to the Edina HRA in the amount of at least ten (10) percent of-all bids.- BY THE ORDER OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND EDINA CITY COUNCIL. Gordon Hughes, Executive Director (HRA) Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Commissioner Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. Commissioner Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR CENTENNIAL LAKES PHASE 1 - RESIDENTIAL STORM SEWER AND PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENT NO. STS -198 (HRA)- IMPROVEMENT NO. P -18 (HRA) BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA: 1. The plans and specifications for the proposed improvements set forth in the following Advertisement for Bids form, - heretofore prepared by the City Engineer and now on file in the office of the City Clerk are hereby approved. 2. The Clerk shall cause to be published in the Edina Sun - Current and Construction Bulletin the following notice of bids for improvements: (official Publication) CITY OF EDINA AND HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 4801 W. 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS CENTENNIAL LAKES STREET IMPROVEMENT - INCLUDES STORM SEWERS, LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOS. BA -189, BA -290, STS -197 AND STS- 198(HRA) SAP 102 - 136 -10 BIDS CLOSE AUGUST 17, 1989 SEALED BIDS will be received and opened in the Council Chambers in Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street at 11:00 A.M., Thursday, August 17, 1989.. The Edina City Council will meet at 7:00 P.M., Monday, August 21, 1989, to consider said bids. The following are approximate major quantities: 4,300 LF 12" to 72" Storm Sewer 7,000 TONS Aggregate Base (Crushed Concrete) 3,200 TONS Bituminous Base Course 1,600 TONS Bituminous Wear Course All in accordance with Plans and Specifications prepared by the engineer, BRW, Inc. and available at the office of the consulting engineer, 700 Third Street South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415, and on file with the Executive Director and City Engineer. Plans and Specifications incorporating the work for the projects may be examined at the City Hall and at the office of BRW, Inc. COPIES may be obtained from BRW, Inc., upon deposit of $25.00 for each set, all of which deposit will be refunded to each planholder who returns the Plans and Specifications in good condition to the consulting engineer within ten (10) days after the date of opening bids. Bids shall be in a sealed envelope with a statement thereon showing the work covered by the bid. Bids should be addressed to the City Engineer, City of Edina, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424, and may be mailed or submitted personally to the City Engineer. Bids received by the City Engineer, either through the mail or by personal submission, after the time set for receiving them may be returned unopened. Work must be done as described in plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. No bids.will be considered unless sealed and accompanied by bid bond or certified check payable to the City of Edina in the amount of at least ten (10) percent of all bids. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND EDINA CITY COUNCIL. Gordon Hughes Executive Director (HRA) Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Commissioner Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, motion of Commissioner Kelly was seconded by Commissioner Smith for adjournment. Motion carried. Executive Director MINUTES OF THE JOINT MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY /CITY COUNCIL HELD AT EDINA CITY HALL AUGUST 7, 1989 A joint meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the City Council was convened to consider concurrently: 1) Edina Homestead Development /RPI Services, 2) Award of Bids - Centennial Lakes Project. Action was taken by the HRA and Council as recorded. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners /Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Richards. MINUTES of the Joint HRA /Council Meeting of June 5, 1989 were approved as submitted by motion of Commissioner/Member Smith, seconded by Commissioner/Member Paulus. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. EDINA HOMESTEAD DEVELOPMENT - RPI SERVICES CONTINUED TO 9/5/89 Motion was made by Commissioner/Member Smith and was seconded by Commissioner/Member Rice to continue the public hearing on final rezoning, final plat and tax increment financing assistance for Edina Homestead Development to the meeting of September 5, 1989 as requested by the proponents. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. BID AWARDED FOR CENTENNIAL LAKES - PHASE I LAKE CONSTRUCTION Executive Director Gordon Hughes presented bid tabulations for Centennial Lakes = Phase I Lake Construction. Six bids were received and it is recommended that award be to Veit and Company, Inc., who bid $482,628.00 against engineer's estimate of $495,500.00. Motion was made by Commissioner Smith for award of bid for Centennial Lakes - Phase I Lake Construction to recommended low bidder, Veit and Company, Inc. at $482,628.00. Motion was seconded by CommissionerRice. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. BID AWARDED FOR CENTENNIAL LAKES — PHASE I CONDOMINIUMS RESIDENTIAL AMENITIES Executive Director Hughes presented bid tabulations for Centennial Lakes - Phase I Condominiums Residential Amenities and explained that this is the site work for the first three buildings. Three bids were received and it is recommended that award be to Monette Construction Company at $99,329.00 against engineer's estimate of $96,050.00. Motion was made by Commissioner Smith for award of bid for Centennial Lakes - Phase I Condominiums Residential Amenities to recommended low bidder, Monette Construction Company, at $99,329.00. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. Motion,was made by Commissioner Rice and was seconded by Commissioner Kelly for adjournment of the HRA. Motion carried unanimously. Executive Director City Clerk 191N�.1 j \ '.> REQUEST FOR PURCHASE N g o; TO: HRA FROM: GORDON HUGHES VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5=0 DATE: 9/5/89 AGENDA ITEM HRA III ITEM DESCRIPTION: Companv Amount of Quote or Bid 1. MONETTE CONSTRUCTION 1. $ 15,600 2. OLYMPIC POOLS 2. 18,900 3. LAKELAND NURSERY 3. 26,850 4. 4. 5. 5, RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: MONETTE CONSTRUCTION $ 15,600 GENERAL INFORMATION: The bids are for the construction of fountains in the common areas of Centennial Lakes Condominiums. The Recommended bid is within budget not w Kenneth Rosland, (City Manager Director rp O ' V FV9�1 "A C.n lo To: HRA From: Gordon Hughes REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Date: September 1, 1989 Subject: PHASE IV CENTENNIAL LAKES CONDOMINIUMS Recommendation: Agenda Item # HRA IV - Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends To HRA ❑ To Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance 0 Discussion Provide direction for HRA assistance to Phase IV Condominiums. Info /Background: On July 10, 1989, Larry Laukka, the Centennial Lakes Condominium developer, appeared before the HRA to request conveyance of the Phase III Condominium Site. At the same time, he presented a revised concept for Phase IV. This concept involved re- ducing the number of dwelling units from 46, as in Phase I and II, to 30 units in Phase IV. The dwelling units would correspondingly increase in size and would be marketed to more affluent purchasers. Selling prides would range from approximately $150,000 to $200,000. Based upon the unit prices, moderate income individuals would not qualify as pur- chasers. Therefore, no second mortgages would be available for Phase IV. However, it was proposed that the HRA, nevertheless, make its normal contribution to the Phase but then transfer the unused second mortgage potential to other condominium phases that would be eligible for purchase by moderate income individuals. Although no vote was taken, all members of the HRA expressed support for the Phase IV concept. (Please refer to the attached minutes.) (CONTINUED ON PAGE 2) -2- Since the July 10th meeting, Laukka Development has been marketing the Phase IV concept. Staff is concerned, however, that the HRA has not discussed whether the Phase IV Condominium should or should not receive an unrecoverable subsidy as is the case in the moderate income.phases. As you know, the HRA assistance in Phases I, II and III, as well as Edinborough, takes two forms: first, an unrecoverable subsidy which is used to reduce the cost of all units in order to make them affordable; and second, a recoverable subsidy in the form of second mortgages that must be repaid upon sale. In Phases I, II and III, the unrecoverable subsidy totals $650,000 per phase. In Phase IV, Laukka Development is suggesting that the unrecoverable subsidy be reduced from $650,000 to $250,000. This amount approximately equals the land cost for the Phase IV site. The issue for the HRA is: Should Phase IV, which is designed for more affluent purchasers, be subsidized by the HRA so as to reduce the selling prices? The HRA may wish to consider the following comments, both pro.and con: Laukka has noted that Phase IV will be identical in exterior appearance to Phase I, II and III. Therefore, floor plans of Phase IV must be substantially modified to accommodate the redesign of the units. Laukka submits that this is expensive and will increase unit prices. The HRA's involvement to date has been to assist projects offering housing opportunities for low and moderate income individuals. Phase IV would be the first departure from this practice. On the other hand, not all Edinborough and Centennial Lakes Phases I, II and III purchasers are moderate income. Although such individuals do not qualify for a second mortgage, they may nevertheless purchase a unit. Therefore, these individuals are benefitting from the unrecovered subsidy in these earlier buildings. Although land costs are somewhat higher than similar market rate projects, we cannot identify other site conditions or'design conditions that make the Phase IV site more difficult or costly to develop. Laukka's gross margin is capped at 25% of cost. Therefore, if units in Phase IV sold for higher prices, Laukka would not benefit. The only benefit Laukka would realize is the speed of sales and the resultant reduction in holding costs which may be provided.by the subsidy. Phase IV could provide an opportunity to test-market this type of housing for future development of other housing sites in Centennial Lakes; e.g. north of Parklawn and south of West 76th Street. Therefore, the requested assistance could facilitate the development of a new and different market segment that could benefit the area. MINUTES OF THE JOINT MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY /CITY COUNCIL HELD AT EDINA CITY HALL JULY 10, 1989 A joint meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the City Council was convened to consider concurrently: 1) Edina Homestead Development, and 2) Conveyance of Phase III - Centennial Lakes Condominiums. Action was taken by the HRA and Council as recorded. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners /Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Richards. MINUTES of the Joint HRA /Council Meeting of June 19, 1989 were approved as submitted by motion of Commissioner/Member Smith, seconded by Commissioner/Member Paulus. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. EDINA HOMESTEAD DEVELOPMENT - RPI SERVICES Motion was made by Commissioner/Member Rice and was seconded by Commissioner/Member Smith to continue the public hearing on final rezoning, final plat and tag increment financing assistance for Edina Homestead Development to the meeting of August 7, 1989 as requested by the proponents. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. CONVEYANCE OF PHASE III - CENTENNIAL LAKES CONDOMINIUMS AUTHORIZED Executive Director Gordon Hughes stated that the condominium developer for Centennial Lakes, Laukka Development, is requesting conveyance of the Phase III condominiums site for development. The Phase III condominium building is proposed to be somewhat different than Phases I and II. Phase III will contain 42 condominium units rather than 46 units as was the case with Phases I and II. Also, an elevator will be included that will serve 26 of the 42 units. This will be the first condominium building served by an elevator in Centennial Lakes or Edinborough. Director Hughes said that the proposal for Phase III is apparently responsive to a market segment comprised of older more affluent condominium purchasers. Due principally to the elevator, the average sale price of the Phase III unit will be approximately $98,800, compared to $90,100 for the Phase II condominium. Due to this increase, fewer units will be affordable to moderate income purchasers. Based on the current policy of limiting second mortgages to units selling for $90,000 or less, 11 units in Phase III will qualify for second mortgage assistance, while 34 units in Phase II qualified for such assistance. Under the developer's proposal, second mortgage funds that would normally be allocated to Phase III will instead be allocated to other buildings in the project to assist moderate income purchasers. The East Edina Housing Foundation has reviewed the proposal for Phase III and has consented to the conveyance. They felt that provision of an elevator would provide a desirable housing opportunity for a different segment of condominium purchasers. Director Hughes stated that Larry Laukka, developer, would present preliminary plans for Phase IV. The unit plans for Phase IV would be reconfigured to provide substantially larger units and would be sold to more affluent purchasers. It is anticipated that none of the units in Phase IV would be sold with second mortgage assistance. In that this proposal for Phase IV departs from the original concept of providing homeownership opportunities to moderate income people, direction is being sought from the HRA concerning this proposal. If the HRA agrees with the concept, the amount of financial assistance, if any, will have to be negotiated with the developer. Director Hughes concluded with the recommendation that the HRA authorize conveyance of Phase III and offer comments and direction for Phase IV. Commissioner Rice asked if it is possible that there would not be a demand for the second mortgage assistance in this and future phases of the project. Director Hughes explained that, by the terms of the agreement with Laukka Development, if the money that the HRA is putting into the project ultimately is not reflected in second mortgages the developer would be obliged to pay the HRA the difference in cash. Mayor Richards said his concern would be that we not preclude someone from this market by reducing the number of units affordable to moderate income people. Larry Laukka, developer, pointed out that in the Edinborough project 80% of the units were purchased by individuals who met the criteria for the second mortgage assistance. In the Centennial Lakes project they are now addressing a broader market that would respond to the people who looked at Edinborough and were not satisfied. This included elderly from the area who could not live in Edinborough because of no elevator. During pre - selling of units in the first two buildings they kept track of those people and had some 165 -170 names listed when they worked on the preliminary designs for the Phase III building to include an elevator. He concluded that there is a market to serve there and that, while there are only 11 units in Phase II that will qualify for second mortgages, he felt they would use the second mortgage money in subsequent phases of the development. Commissioner Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RATIFYING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF VARIOUS DOCUMENTS BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA ")', as follows: 1. Recitals. The HRA and the Edina City Council have previously approved a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 462,1 421, subdivision 15, designated as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, and have approved various amendments there (as so amended, the "Redevelopment Plan "). Acting pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan, the HRA has acquired certain land in the area included in the Redevelopment Plan and it has been proposed that the HRA sell and transfer a portion of such land to the East Edina Housing Foundation (the "Foundation "), pursuant to a Land Sale Agreement by and between the HRA and the Foundation (the "Agreement "). By a resolution adopted March 7, 1988, the HRA approved the form of the Agreement and authorized any two officers of the HRA to execute and deliver the Agreement on behalf of the HRA with such modifications as were deemed appropriate and approved by the Chairman and the Executive Director of the HRA. Pursuant to such authorization the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the HRA executed and delivered the Agreement dated on or as of March 14, 1988. Subsequently, by resolution dated September 12, 1988, the HRA approved execution and delivery by any two officers of the HRA, on behalf of the HRA, of an Amended and Restated Land Sale Agreement and Contract for Private Redevelopment between the HRA and Foundation with such modifications as the attorney for the HRA and Executive Director of the HRA should approve (the "Amended Agreement "). Pursuant to such authorization the Chairman and Secretary of the HRA executed and delivered the Amended Agreement dated on or as of September 30, 1988. In connection with the transactions contemplated by the Amended Agreement, it is now proposed that Phase III of the Condominium Development be commenced on the property described on Exhibit A hereto (the "Phase III Condominium Property ") and that the Phase III Condominium Property be conveyed pursuant to the Amended Agreement and on the same terms and conditions as the Phase II Condominium Property was conveyed with such changes and modifications as may be approved by the Executive Director and the Attorney to the HRA, including those resulting from the proposed addition of an elevator and the proposed sale of units without the use of second mortgages. 2. Authorization for Execution and Delivery of Documents. Any two officers of the HRA are authorized and directed to execute such instruments and agreements as may be required or be desirable to accomplish the conveyance of the Phase III Condominium Property pursuant to the Amended Agreement with such changes and. modifications as may be approved by the Executive Director and Attorney for the HRA. The execution of such instruments and agreements by any two officers of the BRA shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents by the HRA in accordance with this Resolution. EXHIBIT A THE HOMES OF CENTENNIAL LAKES PHASE III CONDOMINIUM LAND DESCRIPTION Lot 3, Block 1, THE HOMES OF CENTENNIAL LAKES, according to the recorded plat thereof. Attest: Chairman Executive Director Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Commissioner Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice,.Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. Preliminary Plans - Phase IV - Mr. Laukka explained that a number of requests have been made for a condominium building in which the units would be larger, e.g. approximately 1,500 square feet. In response, they worked on a conceptual design within the existing footprint of the building and without materially changing the appearance that would provide 30 units, all of which would be served by an elevator. After pricing that out, it was determined that the building could be done at approximately $160- 170,000 per dwelling unit. Mr. Laukka said they had some concern for the future with the change in the tax laws, tax increment, etc. They felt that if there is a way to begin to put money back into the capital pool it would be a wise idea and that the proposed building might do that. It is estimated that they will be able to keep about $600,000 for the building in the capital pool if they take the opportunity to sell 30 semi - luxury condominium units. He said this design concept is now on the drawing board and that they are-ready to proceed but cannot do that without the acquiescence of the HRA. Basically, it is a business decision - does it make sense to introduce a third market to that development. Considerable discussion on the concept for the Phase IV condominium building as proposed was held which included: 1) possible negatives from a public viewpoint, 2) monthly assessment for unit owners, 3) effect on market value /real estate taxes on other Centennial Lakes units or Edinborough, 4) effect on resale value of units in Edinborough /Centennial Lakes, 5) market for units priced at $170,000, considering the mix in the development, and 6) creating a market rate "ghetto" within the development. Following discussion, the Commissioners individually said they concurred conceptually with the proposal for the Phase IV condominium building as presented by Mr. Laukka. Motion was made by Commissioner Smith and was seconded by Commissioner Paulus for adjournment of the HRA. Motion carried unanimously. Executive Director City Clerk MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JULY 24, 1989 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor Richards. EDINA MASONIC LODGE COMMENDED FOR $1.500 CONTRIBUTION John Peterson, Kenneth Nelson and Bob Soelberg presented a check in the amount of $1,500 to the City from the Edina Masonic Lodge for use by the Fire Department for acquisition of emergency equipment. On behalf of the Council, Mayor Richards thanked the Lodge for their gift read the following resolution which was unanimously adopted: RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION WHEREAS, for the past twelve years the Edina Masonic Lodge has donated money to the Edina Fire Department for its rescue equipment; and WHEREAS, this money has been earned by members of the Lodge from their efforts in putting on an annual Pancake Breakfast; and SEAS, a check in the amount of $1,500 has been generously given to the Edina Fire Department for purchase of rescue equipment; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that most sincere appreciation be expressed to all members of the Edina Masonic Lodge for its interest in the well -being of all Edina residents through this generous contribution; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Resolution be entered into the Minutes and that an appropriate copy be presented to the EDINA MASONIC LODGE as a token of gratitude of the Edina City Council and all the citizens of Edina. ADOPTED this 24th day of July, 1989. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE JOINT HRA /COUNCIL MEETING AND REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 15, 1989 APPROVED Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly to approve the Minutes of the Joint HRA /Council Meeting and the Regular Council Meeting of May 15, 1989. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVED FOR CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH BUILDING EXPANSION Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Phil Dommer presented the request for a conditional use permit for Christ Presbyterian Church, generally located at the northeast quadrant of Highway 100 and the West 70th Street exit, to allow a major remodeling and expansion of the church facility. The Church has identified two objectives as part of their proposal: 1) Repair and /or remodel existing space to bring it up to code and up to date. 2) Add space for new and expanded programs to adequately provide for additional members and staff. Christ Presbyterian Church was started in 1959 at its current site and has undergone renovation approximately every ten years. Currently the Church has 1800 members, with average Sunday attendance of approximately 800 total in two services. A variety of events occur through out the week including counseling, youth activities and various educational opportunities. i Planner Dommer pointed out that the existing facility is approximately 40,000 square feet. The proposed additional area is 29,610 square feet and will provide the following new facilities: Multi- purpose activities center, counseling center, library, classrooms for youth /adult programs, chapel, expanded offices, larger restrooms and expanded nursery. The Community Development and Planning Commission reviewed the proposal on May 31, 1989. Significant issues raised were parking and access and the Planning Commission decided to continue the matter to allow the Church an opportunity to address those concerns. The proposal presented by the Church would provide an additional 170 parking spaces for the site. They have also prepared a traffic mitigation plan which included the addition of a third service, car - pooling, shuttle service and the use of parking attendants. By instituting these measures it is hoped that the construction of additional parking will not be necessary and that green space can be retained. In addition, the new plan also eliminated one driveway from West 69th Street, revised the parking area to the north to provide a one -way exit onto the frontage road and provided access to the lot from the main parking lot. The Church is requesting no variances and are complying with all codes. The plan will not increase the existing 522 seating capacity of the main sanctuary. Planner Dommer advised that the Planning Commission at their meeting on July 5, 1989 unanimously recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit., subject to: 1) Proof of Parking Agreement 2) Signage directing traffic egress only onto frontage road 3) Landscaping plan approved by staff, primarily as a buffer on the north 4) Installation of a gate at the 69th Street exit to control traffic. Since then staff has met with the Church to further the traffic mitigation plan. The Church has indicated they will implement two measures immediately: 1) Upgrade the berm along West 69th Street, and 2) Implement a program to sensitize members to the traffic concerns of the neighborhood. A traffic and parking study was conducted by the Church on July 16, 1989, a higher than average attendance Sunday. It indicated that early service attendance was 170 compared with an average of 187. Late service attendance was 527 compared with an average of 374. During the early service period 99 cars entered from West 70th Street, with 180 cars during the late service period. No traffic delays were experienced on West 70th Street. The report also showed 32 cars exiting on West 69th Street towards Dunberry. Following the presentation, Mayor Richards stated that copies of letters.received from residents objecting to the Christ Presbyterian Church proposal had been furnished to the Council Members as well as copies of a petition circulated in the surrounding residential neighborhood. The meeting was then opened for public comment. Bill Hall, 7416 Shannon Circle, stated that he and his wife are co- chairs of the Christ Presbyterian Building Committee and have been members of the Church as well as residents of the City for 22 years. He stated that the congregation was started in 1956 with 150 charter members. The current facility was completed in 1968 at which time the membership was 1,082 with two ministers on staff. Current membership is at 1,800 with 12 ministers on staff reflecting a growth rate of 2% per year. Mr. Hall observed that the role of the Church in the community has greatly changed from its earlier years. He mentioned some of the 150 organizations that meet in the facility, many of which are directly church related and some that are community related. The Church is used all day and most nights. The staff includes two fulltime counselors and one parttime. In reality, while the Church has grown by 2% in membership, it has had remarkable growth in missions and activities. Mr. Hall commented that the facility is inadequate for the current activities, and that five years ago the Church hired Robert David Burrow Architects, Inc., a firm that specializes in church remodeling and new church construction, to look at their needs. The proposed expansion has been considered as to various orientations on the site and as to how its character can be retained and enhanced. They have concluded that the proposal as presented is the best plan possible for the site. It will consist of one -third remodeling, one -third new construction, and one -third update for code compliance. Mr. Hall said they had met on June 22, 1989 with concerned neighbors, with approximately 12 in attendance who were not members of the Church. Concerns expressed were about traffic, appearance and parking. He said Christ Church feels it has addressed those concerns and elaborated on some of the changes made to the original plan in response. Mr. Hall indicated that there have been some miscommunications with the neighbors and responded to the items of concern that had been expressed. Commercial activity center - No commercial area is planned. There will be a multi - purpose room to be used by the Church and also by the community, e.g. voting, bloodmobile, counseling. Parking lot north of 69th Street - A parking lot had been proposed some years ago. However, the Church acknowledged that it was not a good idea and was insensitive to the neighbors. This property is being held for investment and the Church would consider selling it if they obtained a good offer. Elderly housing - Ten years ago this was proposed by some neighbors and members who did not want to leave Edina. A fund of $140,000 ear - marked for that was given to Presbyterian Homes of Minnesota, for the Gideon Pond elderly housing project and the Church continues to -give them $10,000 annually. Mr. Hall said he felt that a number of neighbors who had signed the petition had done so because they had misinformation concerning the Church's plan for expansion. In conclusion, Mr. Hall commented that one of the great strengths of Edina is its churches. The churches add to the character and moral fiber of the community. He stated that Christ Presbyterian Church has been a good neighbor as indicated by the Church's mission statement and its generous contributions over the years to help people in great need. Speaking in opposition to the proposal for expansion of Christ Presbyterian Church were: John Hoyt, 4812 Dunberry Lane; Ray and Catherine Wallentine, 6821 Normandale Road; Kingsley Holman, Holman Law Offices, representing neighbors; Dave Gepner, 4817 Dunberry Lane; Floyd Graviel, 4817 Wilford Way; Joe Florenzano, 4712 W. 70th Street; Peg Gallagher, 6812 Brittany Road; and Pat Milan, 4800 W. 70th Street. Concerns and issues raised included increased traffic and activities, location of expansion to the north close to homes, Church's lack of communication with neighbors, decrease in property values for neighborhood, lighting for parking lot, public policy on churches being an appropriate use in R -1 District, need for feasibility /traffic study, and Church's past relations with neighborhood. Speaking in support of the proposal were: William Hull, 6833 Creston Road, Emarie Payne, 4614 Bruce Avenue; Carol Mearkle, 4425 Judson Lane; Craig Peterson, 6121 Parnell Avenue; and Lloyd Cherne, 5704 View Lane. Mayor Richards then called for comment and /or questions from the Council. Member Smith asked: 1) how far the north parking lot would be from the curb and also the distance to the building, 2) the additional parking that would be provided with the expansion and also under the Proof of Parking Agreement, and 3) if the Church has offered to fund a traffic study. In response, Planner Dommer said there would be 10 feet of street right of way, a 20 -foot setback for the lot, 51 -foot width for the parking lot and approximately 16 feet from the lot to the building expansion. The proposal would provide a net gain of 22 parking spaces, and with a Proof of Parking Agreement there would be a potential for an additional 170 M spaces. As to a traffic study, the only information that has been provided are the traffic and parking counts.taken on July 16. Member Kelly asked why the building expansion was oriented to the north rather than to the south. Mr. Hall explained that in trying to work with existing space and existing flow of everything, they looked at the back and south sides and concluded that having building areas on both side of the sanctuary would not work and flow with their programs and office staff. Member Rice commented that although this has been difficult and time consuming it was a clear decision for him. He said he had talked with proponents and opponents concerning the proposed expansion and made these observations: 1) Traffic concerns - Traffic increase that would occur on West 70th Street because of the expansion would be relatively irrelevant. Sunday traffic on Dunberry Lane is not significant. He said he was concerned about the parking on Tuesdays for the bible study and that the Church could do something to mitigate that so there would not be street parking on Dunberry. 2) Church's neighborliness - There have been questions concerning maintenance of the grounds and parking lot lighting over the years: He said he felt a better job could be done in the future and would encourage the Church to consider that. 3) Uncertainty of future land use of adjacent church property - The Church has answered those questions and he did not see any other use being allowed in an R -1 District. 4) Property east of Church - House is owned by the Church but is not particularly attractive. Something could be done to improve that. S) Chimes - Most neighbors liked the chimes but felt something could be done to improve the programming. 6) Neighborhood relations - Suggested some kind of a regular forum once a year between the Church and the neighborhood to dispel rumors as to the Church's plans. Member Rice concluded by saying that he intended to support the project because of the great benefits he felt all the churches, and in particular Christ Church, bring to the community and for the steps the Church would take to mitigate any parking problems. Member Paulus made two comments: 1) Concerning traffic - As a representative to the I -494 Coalition, she said we need to become aware of what is happening to streets like West 70th and that whatever study we would do now would be obsolete. I -494 will not be able to grow fast enough to accommodate future traffic and Edina will see some of that traffic filter through City streets. She said she did not feel we can protect West 70th Street from that future impact. 2) Real estate values - She said it is hard to measure what affect the Church expansion will have on the neighborhood because a house is worth whatever someone will pay for it. What will affect values in that neighborhood is the traffic on Highway 100 and West 70th Street and that will be greater than what happens at Christ Church. Member Paulus said that she would support the project as she felt the benefits to the community clearly outweigh problems that may be caused by the small amount of additional traffic generated by the expansion. Member Paulus concluded that active and growing churches are one of the components that make Edina a desirable community and that she felt this project would benefit the community as a whole. Mayor Richards said he would support the proposal for these reasons: 1) The Planning Commission looks at these issues on a regular basis and devotes a great deal of time in making decisions. A unanimous recommendation for approval is important and persuasive that we remain a progressive community. 2) Design for the expansion is best left to the private sector. He said that the process has brought forth the best design in view of the fact that no variances. are requested and that it complies with the City's codes. 3) The necessary checks and balances are in place, e.g. landscaping plan and proof of parking agreement with traffic mitigation measures. Member Smith commented that he is unaware of any way that the Council can set the size of a congregation or limit the use of a church so long as it is legal and proper. Church use is a special use like a neighborhood school. He said he felt the real issue is the Church's relations with and sensitivity to the neighbors. He said the Church should work with the neighbors on the issues they have raised concerning landscaping, signage and lighting. No further comment being heard, Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption, subject to: 1) Execution of Proof of Parking Agreement including a traffic mitigation plan, 2) Signage directing traffic egress only onto the frontage road, 3) Landscape plan approved by staff, and 4) Installation of a gate at the West 69th Street exit to control traffic. RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WHEREAS, the procedural requirements of Ordinance No. 825 (The Zoning Ordinance) have been met; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the Findings as required by Ordinance No. 825 have been satisfied; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby grants a Conditional Use Permit to Christ Presbyterian Church, 6901 Normandale Road, for building expansion. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Rice. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. PUBLIC HEARING ON CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR GRACE CHURCH CONTINUED TO 8121189 Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Craig Larsen presented the request of Grace Church, located at 5300 France Avenue, for a conditional use permit to allow for expansion and remodeling of the sanctuary and for construction of two new entry vestibules. The expansion and remodeling calls for extending the sanctuary 22.8 feet to the west. The second story of that elevation would be suspended above parking spaces on ground level. The proposed project would not increase the present seating capacity of 890 persons. The purpose of the project would be to improve seating, to provide a direct connection between the main floor and balcony seating and to provide an improved space for the choir. Planner Larsen explained that the project would also include two new entry vestibules. The France Avenue entry would be attached to a canopy over the existing drop -off lane. The proposed canopy would provide a two -foot setback from the property line. The Zoning Ordinance requires a setback of 50 feet from all property lines. He pointed out that the Church currently maintains a non - conforming 35 -foot setback from France Avenue. The entry proposed for the westerly side provides the required setback. At one parking space for each three seats in the sanctuary, a minimum of 197 parking spaces is required. The church now has and will continue to have 610 parking spaces after the remodeling. This results in 313 spaces available on site for concurrent activities. Landscaping and screening for parking areas meets or exceeds Zoning Ordinance requirements. Most of the landscaping was installed in connection with the 1983 addition to the Church. The current proposal would provide additional landscaping on the west, south and east sides of the sanctuary. The proposed landscaping would also include the addition of landscaped islands in the parking lot to the west. Planner Larsen mentioned that the Church held two meetings to explain their plans to interested neighbors prior to appearing before the Community Development and Planning Commission. The first meeting was held for the abutting neighbors along Halifax Avenue. The second meeting was with neighbors within 500 feet of the Church. No letters were received from neighbors prior to the Planning Commission hearing on the proposal. Subsequently, a letter was received from Mary and David Thatcher, 5309 Halifax Avenue So., relative to drainage problems. Representatives from the Church have indicated that they are willing to work with the Thatchers to resolve this. Planner Larsen concluded that the proposed addition and remodeling of existing space will not increase the seating capacity or require increased parking capacity. The level of activity is expected to continue to be similar to today's level. The proposed improvements will improve the way internal spaces function. There is no opportunity to add additional parking on site should parking problems occur in the future; the only way to solve a problem would be to change the operation. Staff would suggest a proof of parking agreement containing parking management techniques similar to those suggested for Christ Presbyterian Church. Planner Larsen observed that staff does have a problem with the proposed canopy on the east side of the Church. As proposed,, the canopy would provide only a two -foot setback from the France Avenue property line. Staff recommended and the Planning Commission concurred that the proposed canopy be eliminated from that entrance. The existing 35 foot setback for the vestibule entry was supported. The Planning Commission expressed sympathy that the Church had limited visibility from France Avenue. The Church will propose that they be allowed to design something that would meet staff approval and that would maintain the 35 foot setback. At its meeting of July 5, 1989, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the conditional use permit, subject to: 1) Removal of the canopy as proposed, and 2) Execution of a proof of parking agreement that would address parking management if parking problems were identified in the future. Richard Lundborg, Chairman of Facilities Task Force, commented that Grace Church has been in existence in Edina for over 50 years and experienced some very rapid growth in the'early '70s. In the early '80s Grace Church had to decide whether they would move and relocate in some other area or stay in Edina. The decision was made to stay in concurrence with zoning laws in effect at that time. Consequently, the Church purchased land'down to West 52nd Street and converted the houses into the large parking area that is there now. The Church also developed a master plan for what would happen if the Church continued to grow. The master plan called for a sanctuary that would seat 1800 people and a two level parking deck to meet on site the 1:3 parking ratio requirement. Mr. Lundborg said that since that time the Zoning Ordinance has been changed and the master plan is no longer valid. The Church agreed that a sanctuary that would seat 1800 would be too big for that area. He explained that the sanctuary that was built was to be a temporary, low cost facility until they could get the larger one. It has a very steep roof which results in poor acoustics, ventilation and sight lines. Now that this will be the permanent sanctuary, they would like to have permission to re -work the sanctuary, enlarge the platform area, extend the balcony down and construct new entrances. He noted that no plans have been approved by the congregation at this point. Mr. Lundborg stated that the proposed project will not add seats, will not add or subtract parking, there will be no traffic change plus or minus as indicated by the traffic study and the Church will not be adding any programs. He introduced Andre Latondresse, Schwarz /Weber Architects, to respond to questions. Mayor Richards asked for clarification as to the number of seats in the sanctuary. Mr. Lundborg explained that they refer to it as the 1,000 seat sanctuary because they had received approval for 1,000 seats. Mr. Latondresse said that there is some conflict between how you measure pew space for the fire code versus the parking code. He confirmed that the seating capacity would remain at the present number of 890. Mayor Richards asked Mr. Latondresse to respond to the recommendation of staff and the"Planning Commission that the canopy be removed from the proposal. Mr. Latondresse said at this point they are asking for permission to redesign the vestibule within the 35 foot setback and so that it does not exceed the height of any part of the existing church, subject to staff approval, without going through the procedure of presenting the modification to the Planning Commission and then to Council. Mayor Richards commented that Grace Church has had a substantial impact on that neighborhood and suggested that the Church was here prematurely. Following discussion and concurrence by the Council Members, Mayor Richards suggested that this be continued so that the Church could come back with a final plan for the vestibule with the understanding that no variance would be granted. Mary Thatcher, 5309 Halifax Avenue, commented that this is the third time Grace Church has done a major building project since they have lived there. She said she was not negative this time but wrote the letter regarding the drainage because it is a problem for four or five lots. She said work has been done on the berm and that she felt it was the Church's intention when they did the last building project to finish the parking lot but it has been sort of "make due ". Mrs. Thatcher explained that their lot is just south of the last storm sewer inlet and the ground drops off together with the level of the berm. She said she hoped this can be remedied as a part of this new building project. Donna Bahn, 5241 Halifax Avenue, said she supported Mrs. Thatcher in the need for looking at the drainage and the plan for the trees and shrubs and what happens in the future. She mentioned that the noise from the air conditioner does impact the neighborhood as well as snow removal from the parking lot at 3:00 a.m. Mayor Richards suggested that the Church discuss these issues with the neighbors. Further, that he would expect staff to work with the Church to address the' concerns that have been raised so that these will be part of the package when the Church returns with their final plans. Member Kelly said she would like to see a landscape plan with respect to the berm. Following further discussion, motion was made by Member Kelly to continue the hearing on the conditional use permit for Grace Church of Edina -to August 21, 1989. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT APPROVED FOR THE HOMES OF CENTENNIAL LAKES Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen presented the request for preliminary plat approval for The Homes of Centennial Lakes. He explained that the subject property is Phase I of the condominium development at Centennial Lakes. The property will ultimately contain six buildings with approximately 46 units in each building. Buildings one and two are now under construction. Previously the Council has approved simple lot divisions to transfer this land from the HRA to the housing developer. Lots 3 through 6 are owned by the Edina HRA and will be conveyed to Laukka as sales permit. Platting the property is necessary for the conveyance and financing of the individual buildings. Planner Larsen noted that the proposed plat will establish individual lots for all six buildings in Phase I. The design and location of the condominium buildings are not changed by the plat. Since the sale and closing of Lot 3 is scheduled prior to the next Council meeting, staff would recommend both preliminary and final plat approval at this time. All conditions in the redevelopment agreement have been met, including subdivision dedication. At its meeting of July 5, 1989, the Community Development and Planning Commission recommended subdivision approval. Planner Larsen pointed out that there is a problem with some of the property being Torrens and some being Abstract. Thus a small portion of the plat in the southwest corner is identified as an outlot. Member Rice introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption, with waiver of second reading: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE HOMES OF CENTENNIAL LAKES BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "THE HOMES OF CENTENNIAL LAKES ", platted by Centennial Lakes Housing Partnership, a Minnesota general partnership, and United Mortgage Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of July 24, 1989 be and is hereby granted final plat approval. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards (Member Kelly was absent for the vote.) Resolution adopted. *VACATION OF PORTION OF RIGHT OF WAY FOR EDINBOROUGH WAY GRANTED Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Pursuant to due notice given, a public hearing was conducted on the request for vacation of a portion of right of way for Edinborough Way. No public comment or objection was heard. Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION VACATING EASEMENT FOR STREET PURPOSES WUI EAS, a resolution of the City Council, adopted the 19th day of June, 1989, fl---ad a.date for a public hearing on a proposed vacation of easement for street purposes; and WHEREAS, two weeks' published and posted notice of said hearing was given and the hearing was held on the 24th day of July, 1989, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the public that said easement vacation be made; and WHEREAS, the Council has considered the extent to which the vacation affects existing easements within the area of the vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric, telephone or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto; NOV, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, that the following described street right of way is hereby vacated: All that part of EDINBOROUGH WAY, as donated and dedicated by SOUTH EDINA DEVELOPMENT ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of LOT 1, BLOCK 2, said SOUTH EDINA DEVELOPMENT ADDITION; thence on an assumed bearing of South 00 degrees 14 minutes 09 seconds East, along the easterly line of said LOT 1 for 100.00 feet; thence South 18 degrees 40 minutes 15 seconds East, continuing along said easterly line for 63.25 feet; thence North 00 degrees 14 minutes 09 seconds West for 159.90 feet to an intersection with the easterly extension of the northerly line of said LOT 1, thence North 89 degrees 57 minutes 33 seconds West, along said easterly extension for 20.00 feet to the point of beginning. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause a notice of completion of proceedings to be prepared, entered in the transfer record of the County Auditor, and filed with the County Recorder, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851. Resolution adopted on rollcall vote, five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING HELD TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE PROHIBITING PLASTIC PACKAGING* RESOLUTION ADOPTED ADVOCATING LEGISIATION REIATIVE TO PLASTIC PACKAGING Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Manager Rosland said that this hearing is to consider a draft ordinance which would prohibit the use of plastic packaging by food establishments which is not environmentally acceptable. He summarized a memorandum on the subject from Janet Chandler, Recycling Coordinator, and the Recycling Commission. The cities of Minneapolis, St. Paul, Shoreview, Robbinsdale, St. Louis Park and Coon Rapids have passed packaging ordinances. Eden Prairie has given the first reading and several cities are considering adoption. On July 10 the Hennepin County Recycling Task Force recommended that the County adopt the Minneapolis Packaging Ordinance, effective July, 1991. The Task Force further recommended that the County encourage food service establishments and other industries to establish their own collection system for reuse or recycling of plastic utensil and packaging items. Regarding enforcement, the Minneapolis Ordinance will be enforced by their Environmental Health Department who makes regular inspections of food establishments. Minneapolis and St. Paul together have hired a consultant to assist in developing rules and standards for enforcement. Some cities which have passed the ordinance have a representative on the Minneapolis -St. Paul Advisory Committee and Edina could also request to be represented. In this way the'rules _. and policies adopted for enforcement will be consistent throughout the area - Additional City staff time would be required to follow through with enforcement. Representatives of the plastics industry oppose efforts to ban or restrict the use of plastic products. They point out that, since plastics are inert materials, they are harmless when landfilled. Further, they believe that plastics will not cause harmful emissions in a properly controlled incineration process. The industry is currently working to set up recycling systems and some markets are available now. The Pollution Control Agency feels it is better to burn plastic than to landfill it because of the energy captured in the incineration process. They would like to see more emphasis on waste reduction in general. Concerning plastic recycling in Edina, the recycling contract calls for a receptacle for plastic to be installed at the Recycling Center by November 1 with BFI to service the receptacle and market the materials. Hennepin County is likely to cover the added costs of picking up plastics in 1990 through funding contracts with the cities. For the commercial sector, working out a plastic recycling IF program is a challenge. Although markets are developing for PET (pop bottle) and HDPE (milk carton) plastics, there is not an opportunity to recycle styrofoan or styrene containers at the present time in this area. Manager Rosland concluded his summary noting that staff would recommend adoption of a packaging ordinance with an effective date of July 1, 1990 and also applying for representation on the Minneapolis -St. Paul Advisory Committee so that Edina's rules and standards for enforcement will be consistent with that of neighboring cities. The Recycling Commission met on July 10 and agreed, on a 4 -1 vote, as follows: 1) Council should adopt a packaging ordinance effective July 1, 1990 with rules for enforcement the same as other communities, and 2) The Recycling Commission should not be the enforcers. They agreed that statewide or countywide regulations would be best. Mayor Richards referred to a draft resolution concerning plastic packaging that had been proposed by Member Smith and asked for comments. Member Smith summarized that the resolution would indicate Edina's support of legislation imposing regulations on plastic packaging in the seven - county metropolitan area and would request the Metropolitan Council to advocate such legislation. He proposed adoption of the resolution in lieu of adopting an ordinance. Member Paulus commented that she would vote in favor of adopting the ordinance because she felt the problem is so great that we cannot wait for the State to enact legislation. Also, because abutting municipalities have adopted a similar ordinance we would be sending a message to the Metropolitan Council and the State Legislature about the seriousness of this issue. Member Rice said that he was not in favor of the ordinance at this time because he felt that it is a broader issue than can be resolved by the Council. He said he would like to hear from those present that have experience with this and that, personally, he was confused about what really is the truth. Member Kelly commented that she also was not in favor of adopting the ordinance at this time. She said she had attended a meeting of the AMM with Manager Rosland this past week,.that they are well aware of the problem and are proposing a prototype resolution relating to plastic packaging. She said national public awareness is growing but without working together this problem will not be solved. Mayor Richards then called for public comment on the issue of plastic packaging. Commissioner Randy Johnson, 2nd District Hennepin County, explained the County's position on the issue, and summarized the County's solid waste plan and how recycling fits in. Approximately 3,300 tons of garbage is generated per day in Hennepin County with 75% going to landfills. The Solid Waste Management Act requires that by 1990 no more unprocessed waste can go.to landfills. The County adopted a new environmental plan a few years ago for composting and recycling. By 1991 they expect to be recycling and composting close to 50% of the total waste stream. He referred to the Minneapolis /St. Paul ordinances and said if plastic packaging is banned it would be a major step backwards for the environment and public health. He said that, for most food packaging purposes, plastic is at least as good or probably better for the environment than the alternative. Commissioner Johnson said that proponents for banning plastic packaging usually give three reasons: 1) Plastic produces harmful emissions when incinerated, 2) Plastic is unsafe in landfills, and 3) Plastic cannot be recycled. He said all three statements are wrong. As to the first, there can be no heavy metals in plastic food packaging by law (no lead, cadmium or mercury). People say dioxins and furans come from burning plastic; the fact is they come from incomplete combustion of chlorine. There is.no chlorine in plastic food packaging with the exception of polyvinylchloride (PVC). and a few very limited applications. Most PVC food packaging is meat foodwrap which is exempted from the Minneapolis ordinance. As to being unsafe in landfills, he said there is no metal and it is stable and inert, producing neither methane nor leachate. It does not decompose and therefore is better to put in landfills as it does not give rise to other problems. They argue that everything should decompose and degrade. However, upon examination of 20 -year old landfills it has been found that nothing really decomposes. They also argue that plastics have too much volume for landfills and quote that it is 7% by weight and 30% by volume., After being compacted in a landfill, plastic is still 7% by weight but studies have shown that it is reduced to about 10 -11% by volume. Regarding plastic not being recyclable, Commissioner Johnson said that hi- density polyethylene (HDPE) (milk jugs) and polyethylene terepthalate (PET) (pop bottles) are recyclable. These items, properly washed and ground, are worth as much as $200 -500 per ton in a recycling program. Plastics are worth more than anything else in the waste stream that can be recycled except aluminum. He noted that there is a strong local market to buy this plastic. The local plastics industry use or want to use post consumer ground material because it is almost as good as the virgin material. The problem is that it is not being collected for recycling yet in this area. A third type that people get upset about is polystyrene foam (egg cartons and cups). They say we should ban this type because it contains chlorofluorocarbons (CFC). None of the polystyrene foam products used in this part of the country contains CFC because the largest local manufacturer (Amoco - Chippewa Falls, WI) has never used CFC. There is a market for clean, washed polystyrene foam, with collection the basic problem. Commissioner Johnson said that there are several problems with recycling plastic. The attraction of plastic is that it is light weight and covers a lot of product. However, when you collect it in a truck you are transporting a lot of air, which is expensive, and somehow it must be densified. He noted that the County is working on compactors to be available for the trucks that collect plastic. He illustrated a low -tech way to densify plastics by stepping on a pop bottle - 60% densification with no compactor. He observed that there has been a lot of talk about recycling plastics into landscape timbers, picnic tables, car stops, etc. However, the best value for all plastic recyclables is to get it back to the basic resin types, hi- density or PET for which there are many potential uses. Material that is left, mixed plastic and unidentified resin, can be used for such items as landscape timbers. He stated that the Minneapolis ordinance is irrelevant to what is going on in Hennepin County. The County Board plans next year to require every city that is part of the recycling program and who accepts up to the 80% reimbursement fee to pick up plastic, at least the hi- density polyethlene and PET in order to remain eligible. If a city wants to ban plastic packaging and at the same time pick it up for recycling they can, but it does not make a lot of sense. He said "cities would be collecting it because it is too valuable to ban and too valuable to throw away and is more sanitary and safer than other packaging options. The Pollution Control Agency (PCA) is moving in the same direction. The same week the Minneapolis ordinance was passed the PCA awarded a $30,000 grant to a Florida firm to explore the economic feasibility of locating their grinding, washing and plastic processing here in the Twin Cities. As to things local government can do, Commissioner Johnson said that banning plastic is not one of them. He suggested the following: 1) Buy more recycled products, e.g. paper, tires, containers, 2) Photocopy on both sides of paper, 3) Continue the source separation and collection efforts already begun (some cities have achieved rates that exceed the 1991 goals), and 4) Continue household hazardous waste drop -off programs. In conclusion, Commissioner Johnson said that if the City is serious about the ban they should look at each type of material and be objective. There is no reason that polystyrene cannot be recycled by high volume users with no big subsidy required, beginning next year when the County has everything in place. Levering Wood, Recycling Commission Member, said he was the only person on the Commission that voted against the proposed ordinance. He said all members of the Commission want to do something about getting plastic out of the waste stream and the only disagreement is how to do it. He said we should recycle more material and not do something drastic like banning plastic packaging. Also, he said that this is outside of the local jurisdiction and is not a city or county issue, but a state issue. Another reason was that we have not dealt with the economic and competitive hardships that would impact Edina's small businesses. As written, the proposed ordinance is somewhat clumsy in terms of administrative functions and he said he felt the members of the Commission should not have to be "plastics policemen ". He said if the ordinance is adopted he for one would not have the r time or be willing to be involved in enforcement. He concluded that instead of putting these dollars into'a program that would ban plastic packaging the City should instead put that money into a commercial recycling program. Ardythe Buerosse, Recycling Commission Chair, commented that the proposed ordinance does not necessarily ban plastic packaging. It would prohibit the use of packaging which is not environmentally acceptable. It would not apply to recyclable packaging if that would then be recycled. Steve Sando, Recycling Commission Member, commented that one of the reasons why the Commission voted for the ordinance was to press the issue. They were afraid that unless this type of action is taken the plastic industry would drag its feet. The purpose was to send a message that the communities are serious about this issue and they need to set up a process to bring this plastic back into the system to be recycled. Dottie Rietow, Metropolitan Council Member and Vice Chairperson of the Environmental Resource Committee, said she came to listen to the debate on this issue but on hearing the Metropolitan Council mentioned she felt she should give an overview of what the Council is doing on this issue. She said they have come a long way since the passage of the Waste Management Act and that a lot of it has been a learning process. Part of the system has worked well and part has worked too well (recycling pickup of newspapers). They have learned that there must be markets for recyclables and that recycling product is only truly recycled after it has been source separated, collected, and reused in a useable product. Ms. Rietow advised that the Metropolitan Council is in the process of rewriting their solid waste policy plan. They still have the same goals: 1) Abatement (create less waste), 2) Recycle together with using recycled products. The energy recovery.processes, the refuse derived fuel and the mass burn are the next items on. their priority list, with landfills stated as the least favored solution for solid waste disposal. She said that burn facilities are not easy to site. Also it is very important to remove the problem wastes from the waste stream. Those include batteries and plastics. She pointed out that the basic problem in creating recycled products is that a company have enough of a stream of recyclables to produce the product - it is a chicken /egg thing - what do you have first. The basic thing the Council is looking at now is how to develop a plan that meets the goals set and but has economic incentives to promote that goal. When landfill tipping fees are less than that of energy burning plants so that it makes more sense to landfill it doesn't work. Plastics are a growing part of the waste stream and they want to know how to deal with it appropriately. The fact that the plastics industry is now looking at this issue more has something to do with the kind of ordinance Minneapolis has passed. Packaging ordinances probably belong at the national level but it is important that we all work together to get a system that works in an economically feasible way for the least possible cost. Dave Locey, President of Recycle Minnesota Resources (RMR) and Executive Vice President of the Soft Drink Association, stated that his firm processes and markets 75% of the material under a contract with BFI which includes recyclables from Edina along with material from Minneapolis and Dakota County. RMR also operates the Burnsville and Minneapolis recycling facilities and one in St. Paul. Mr. Locey said he had met with numerous plastic companies and has had calls from about 13 -14 companies within the last three weeks. There is a strong market there for recyclable plastic. They are anxious to buy the material, the problem is collection and processing. He said they have been talking with John Moorland of BFI in regard to this issue. He mentioned that BFI has a truck that should be here in approximately two weeks. Also, RMR is ordering a densification unit to try out. He said the best answer right now is to have the consumer densify it at the house which would take of the problem even in the household recycling container. He said they believe the end result is to look at a broad spectrum of products. Obviously, consumer education plays a great deal in this issue. The hangup is that some products come in two different forms of plastics; one form may contaminate the waste stream if they chose not to separate back at their central facility. Personally, he said that trying to separate the types of plastics is an inefficient process and the end result probably will be baling the material mixed to be sent to a national firm. Mr. Locey said that the problem with the Minneapolis ordinance is that it tries to define products for collection. In other words, if you chose to collect it then it is okay, it is recyclable and then we will allow you to sell it. If you don't chose to collect it then it is not okay and it is banned. He indicated that RMR may chose to not take certain products into their collection system because they will contaminate all the other recyclables, although the product they chose not to collect may be just as recyclable. He said that at this point in time we really don't know the answers and that decisions made on products based on being "environmentally acceptable" may not be workable. The focus should be on recycling the containers and not on= banning them. Michael Flannagan introduced himself as the Minneapolis attorney representing the Council for Solid Waste Solutions which is the plastics industry which has been referred to in the discussions. He assured that the plastics industry has gotten the message that plastics must be recycled. Two years ago incineration was thought to be the answer but they now know they have to recycle. He provided a data packet and referred to newspaper headlines therein reflecting this commitment. He concluded by saying there will be a secondary market for plastics and that will be here soon. Bill Barnhart, City of Minneapolis - Office of Intergovernmental Relations',' observed that the City of Minneapolis was the first city to pass the ordinance banning plastic packaging. He said he disagreed with nothing that had been said on the end market of recycling resins. He stated that he agreed wholeheartedly with all the problems that are present now in the collection system for plastic. He concurred that there has been phenomenal movement in the last six months by the industry towards the opening of plants nationally and development of new concepts and markets. Mr. Barnhart pointed out that the Minneapolis ordinance is not aimed at discriminating against plastics per se and is not about picking up plastics. That what it is about is designing a waste stream to maximum the waste management options at the top end of the waste management hierarchy, e.g. source reduction, re -use and recycling, to minimize landfilling and incineration. Mr. Barnhart noted that under the ordinance if Minneapolis banned plastic and collected plastic - that doesn't occur because if they collect plastics they are not banned, they are allowed. He also referred to Commissioner Johnson's comment that what is needed is selective bans on certain types of plastics. He argued that if they picked up HDPE and PET the effect may be selected bans. Mr. Barnhart responded to the four questions that had been raised.. Withstanding legal challenge - He referred to .a case in Minnesota when plastic milk jugs were banned in 1979 which was taken to the Supreme Court. The State won on virtually every count. The key to the law would be the regulations that go with it. Enforcement - An Advisory Committee on Environmentally Acceptable Packaging has been formed with 21 members and representation from three generic groups, e.g. plastics industry, food industry, and government. Also, a consultant (food packaging engineer) has been hired to work with the Committee to develop rules and standards for enforcement. Island effect - He noted that approximately 745,000 people are covered by the island which includes Minneapolis, St. Paul, Coon Rapids, St. Louis Park, Robbinsdale and Shoreview who have passed the ordinance with several more cities considering a similar ordinance. Nationally, over 125 cities have passed ordinances and the City of Chicago has introduced it. Over 300 requests have been received for copies of the ordinance. Should be done at higher level of government - It is the position of the City of Minneapolis that this should be regulated at the state and national level. There is some concern about the ability of state legislators and Congress being able to do this because of political gridlock induced by special interest groups. Member Smith commented that he would not like to move ahead on the draft ordinance as presented and that he felt what people are talking about is the concept of the ordinance. At this point he said this would be premature and he would like to see staff and the Recycling Commission work with BFI and then come back with a recommendation as to how and when we can begin recycling plastics. Discussion followed on the draft resolution suggested by Member Smith. Member Smith then introduced the following revised resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, discarded packaging from food and beverages constitutes a significant and growing portion of the waste stream in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, and WHEREAS, plastic packaging can best be regulated on a region -wide basis in order to provide uniform standards and regulations and to reduce the cost of enforcement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That the City Council of the City of Edina supports legislation imposing rules.and regulations on plastic packaging in the seven - county metropolitan area. FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, That the City Council requests the Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities area, to advocate uniform local legislation that would provide uniform standards and regulations for all cities in the seven- county metropolitan area relative to the prohibition and recycling of plastic packaging. Motion for adoption.of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Rice, Smith !lays: Paulus, Richards Resolution adopted. FIRST READING OF PERSONNEL ORDINANCE NO. 122 CONTINUED TO 8/7/89 Manager Rosland presented the draft Personnel Ordinance No. 122 and the new Employee. Handbook. He noted the following recommended changes in benefits: 1) One additional day of vacation is given to employees for each year of employment between 10 and 15 years (Sec. 9(b)). 2) Accrued vacation paid for at time employment is ended is increased from 208 hours to 240 hours (Sec. 9(f)). 3) Severance pay is increased from 4 weeks to 6 weeks (Sec. 17(b)). He noted that otherwise the wording of the Ordinance reflects the-way we function presently and adoption is recommended. Member Kelly said she was pleased to finally see the Ordinance and that she could approve it in concept but had some questions about the organization chart. Mayor Richards commented that the changes in benefits would involve additional costs and that he could not support adoption without knowing what those costs are. Members Smith and Paulus said they concurred. Member Paulus made a motion to continue First Reading of Personnel Ordinance No. 122 to August 7, 1989 and to direct staff to bring back figures concerning costs for the recommended changes in benefits. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. 4 *BID AWARDED FOR CENTENNIAL LAKES BRIDGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. BA -289A Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for Centennial Lakes Bridge Improvement Project No. BA -289A to recommended low bidder, Lunda Construction, at $746,102.40. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR CHLORINATORS FOR WELLS Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for four chlorinators for wells to recommended low bidder, Vess Company, Inc., at $6,624.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. . TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF 7118/89 APPROVED Member Kelly moved approval of the following recommended action listed in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of July 18, 1989: 1) To "One Way" stripe the West 49 1/2 Street Municipal Parking Lot and allow parking for three vehicles on the east curb line and one vehicle on the west curb line while staying within the Ordinance dimension guidelines, 2) To Post "30 MPH" speed limit signs east and west of the park area at West 44th Street and Grimes Avenue, and to post "PARK- PIAYGROUND" signs in the area of the park property, and to assign the Traffic Enforcement Unit to West 44th Street for enforcement efforts, 3) To stripe West 70th Street west of Highway 100 to Antrim Road and also Cahill Road in a similar layout to portions east of Highway 100 and to conduct a warrant study on a 3 -way "STOP" sign placement at Tracy Avenue and West 70th Street, 4) To paint a yellow centerline stripe on Dakota Trail, to place appropriate advisory speed signs, and review by the Park Department for minimal trimming in the most blind areas, 5) To post a "DO NOT ENTER" sign on the east frontage road at West 66th Street and Highway 100, and to acknowledge Sections B and C of the Minutes. Motion for approval was seconded by Member Smith. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *ON -SALE WINE LICENSE APPROVED FOR BRAVO[ ITALIAN SPECIALTIES (3910 -12 W•' '-50TH ST) Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly to approve issuance of an On -Sale Wine License to Bravol Italian Specialties restaurant at 3910 -12 West 50th Street. 'Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. APPROVAL OF JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT - MINNESOTA DRIVE CONTINUED TO 8/21189 Member Kelly made a motion to continue approval of the Joint Powers Agreement - Minnesota Drive to August 21, 1989. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. ROBERT SHERMAN REAPPOINTED TO THE EDINA FOUNDATION BOARD: APPOINTMENT TO COMMUNITY EDUCATION SERVICES BOARD CONTINUED TO 8/7/89 Member Kelly made a motion that Robert Sherman be reappointed to The Edina Foundation Board. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice,'Smith, Richards Mayor Richards suggested that the Council Members submit names to him for appointment to the Community Education Services Board and that the matter be continued to August 7, 1989. APPOINTMENTS MADE TO COMMUNITY ENERGY COUNCIL Manager Rosland recalled that on April 3, 1989 the Council voted to participate in the Governor's Community Energy Program which would provide weatherization services to Edina and Hopkins residents. To guide the two -year program a Community Energy Council will be established with three individuals representing Edina. Staff would recommend appointment of Lyman Antonson, Brian Duoos and Roger Heegaard. Member Smith made a motion that Lyman Antonson, Brian Duoos and Roger Heegaard be appointed to the Community Energy Council as representatives of Edina. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. * WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -370 AUTHORIZED* BID AWARDED Motion of Member Smith was seconded by Member Kelly for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION ORDERING WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -370 UPON PETITION THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. It is hereby found and determined that a petition has been filed requesting the Council to construct a watermain improvement at 10 Woodland Road and 11 Woodland Road, and to assess the entire cost against the property of petitioners, and that said petition has been signed by all owners of real property where said improvement is to be located. 2. The making of said improvement in accordance with said petition is hereby ordered pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.031(3), (Session Laws of 1961, Chapter 525, Section 2). Said improvement is hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -370. The entire cost of said improvement is hereby ordered to be assessed against the properties at 10 Woodland Road and 11 Woodland Road where said improvement is to be located. Resolution adopted on rollcall vote, five ayes. Motion of Member Smith was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for construction of Watermain Improvement No. WM -370 to recommended low bidder, Plumbing & Heating Repair, Inc., at $5990.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *CENTENNIAL LAKES PIIBLIC IMPROVEMENTS BA -290 AND STS -197 AUTHORIZED: BIDS TO BE TAKEN Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION ORDERING CENTENNIAL LAKES PIIBLIC IMPROVEMENTS, STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -290 AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. STS -197 UPON PETITION THEREFOR BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. It is hereby found and determined that a petition has been filed requesting. the Council to construct public improvements in the Centennial Lakes Project and to assess the entire cost against Phase I of Centennial Lakes except for the stormwater utility portion. 2. The making of said improvement in accordance with said petition is hereby ordered pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.031 (3), (Session Laws of 1961, Chapter 525, Section 2). Said improvements are hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as: STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -290 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. STS -197. The entire cost of said improvements is hereby ordered to be assessed against the properties in Phase I of Centennial Lakes, except that for the storm sewer improvement approximately $130,000 will be funded from the stormwater utility. Resolution adopted on rollcall vote, five ayes. Motion of Member Smith was seconded by Member Kelly for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -290 AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. STS -197 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA: 1. The plans and specifications for the proposed improvements set forth in the folloving Advertisement for Bids form, heretofore prepared by the City Engineer and now on file in the office of the City Clerk are hereby approved. 2. The Clerk shall cause to be published in the Edina Sun- Current and Construction Bulletin the folloving notice of bids for improvements: (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA AND HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 4801 W. 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS CENTENNIAL LAKES STREET IMPROVEMENT - INCLUDES STORM SEWERS, LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOS. BA -189, BA -290, STS -197 AND STS- 198(HRA) SAP 102 - 136 -10 BIDS CLOSE AUGUST 17, 1989 SEALED BIDS will be received and opened in the Council Chambers in Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street at 11:00 A.M., Thursday, August 17, 1989. The Edina City Council vill meet at 7:00 P.M., Monday, August 21, 1989, to consider said bids. The folloving are approximate major quantities: 4,300 LF 12" to 72" Storm Sever J 7,000 TONS Aggregate Base (Crushed Concrete) 3,200 TONS Bituminous Base Course 1,600 TONS Bituminous Wear Course All in accordance vith Plans and Specifications prepared by the engineer, BRW, Inc. and available at the office of the consulting engineer, 700 Third Street South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415, and on file with the Executive Director and City Engineer. Plans and Specifications incorporating the vork for the projects may be examined at the City Hall and at the office of BRW, Inc. COPIES may be obtained from BRW, Inc., upon deposit of $25.00 for each set, all of which deposit vill-be refunded to each planholder vho returns the Plans and Specifications in good condition to the consulting engineer vithin ten (10) days after the date of opening bids. Bids shall be in a sealed envelope with a statement thereon shoving the vork covered by the bid. Bids should be addressed to the City Engineer, City of Edina, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424, and may be mailed or submitted personally to the City Engineer. Bids received by the City Engineer, either through the mail or by personal submission, after the time set for receiving them may be returned unopened. Work must be done as described in plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. No bids vill be considered unless sealed and accompanied by bid bond or certified check payable to the City of Edina in the amount of at least ten (10) percent of all'bids. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND EDINA CITY COUNCIL. Gordon Hughes Executive Director (HRA) Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk Resolution adopted on rollcall vote, five ayes. I -494 JOINT POWERS ORGANIZATION TO WORK ON ORDINANCE CONCERNING LAND USAGES Member Paulus reported that at the last I -494 Joint Powers Organization (JPO) meeting they approved an agreement in which the five participating municipalities would work together to create an ordinance concerning land usages because of the impact on I -494 of the number of large office buildings. She said that Minnetonka has volunteered their legal counsel and the rest of the cities will donate staff hours. COMMENT MADE REGARDING ROOM & BOARD SIGN Member Rice referred to the Room & Board sign on the rear of their building at 7100 France Avenue and commented that he feels it is offensive and if'legal we should consider changing the ordinance. Member Smith noted that the sign is not turned off after store hours as promised. ELM TREES ON SOUTH SIDE OF GRACE CHURCH MENTIONED Member Rice said that several elm trees on the south side of Grace Church look diseased and asked that they be checked. STAFF COMPLIMENTED FOR WEED REMOVAL AT CITY HALL Member Rice complimented staff for the weed removal from the retaining wall in front of City Hall. He said that the same should be done on the west side. MANAGER COMPLIMENTED: PARKING REQUESTED Member Kelly said that she had attended a recent AMM meeting with Manager Rosland and had observed how well respected he is by other governmental officials as well as citizens. She also asked about the possibility of reserved parking on Council Meeting nights for Council Members. MICHAEL DUCAR LETTER CONCERNING TREE PLANTING PROGRAM NOTED Member Kelly referred to a letter she had received from Michael Ducar, 4616 Wooddale Avenue, concerning a tree planting program for the City and asked that copies be provided to the Council Members so that this could be considered at budget hearing time. ANALYSIS OF RECYCLING COSTS FROM BFI REQUESTED Member Smith said he would like to have "an analysis from BFI on recycling costs and how it is impacting the trash hauling. He said he felt costs on both are going up. CONCERN NOTED REGARDING PROCEDURE FOR REZONING AND PLATTING AND COMMUNICATION BETWEEN PROPONENTS AND IMPACTED NEIGHBORHOODS Member Paulus commented that 70% of the problems that are brought to public hearings on rezoning and platting could be corrected if there were better communication between the proponents and affected neighbors. She asked if the procedure could be re- written so that the proponents would be required early on to work with neighborhoods that are impacted. Member Paulus also asked if somehow churches.and schools that impact neighborhoods could be required to hold open meetings once a year to talk about problems. She suggested these items be put on an upcoming agenda for discussion. 1989 NLC CONGRESS OF CITIES DISCUSSION DEFERRED TO 8/7/89 Mayor Richards suggested that a discussion on the upcoming 1989 NLC Congress of Cities to be held on November 15 -19 in Atlanta be deferred to August 7, 1989. REPORT ON ENTERPRISE FUNDS DEFERRED TO 817189 Mayor Richards asked that the report on the enterprise funds be deferred to August 7, 1989 because of the late hour. CLAIMS PAID Motion of Member Smith was seconded by Member Kelly to approve payment of the following claims as per pre -list dated 7/24/89: General Fund $1,865,792.87, Communications $42.03, Art Center $2,183.93, Capital Fund $985.98, Swimming Pool Fund $3,964.18, Golf Course Fund $31,853.61, Recreation Center Fund $49,976.17, Gun Range Fund $231.28, Edinborough Park $8,328.38, Utility Fund $154,576.08, Storm Sewer Utility $115,512.58, Liquor Dispensary Fund $134,161.38, Construction Fund,$211,276.42, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $349,470.02, Total $2,928,354.91; and to confirm payment of claims dated 6/30/89: General Fund $306,836.54, C.D.B.G. $171.60, Art Center $1,395.71, Swimming Pool Fund $1,547.13, Golf Course Fund $24,007.28, Recreation Center Fund $9,916.79, Gun Range Fund $515.48, Edinborough Park $11,238.20, Utility Fund $26,153.80, Liquor Dispensary Fund $340,378.94, Construction Fund $7,365.90, Total $729,527.37 Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the meeting adjourned at 11:50 p.m. City Clerk M � MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL AUGUST 7, 1989 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor Richards. CONSTITUTION WEER PROCLAIMED Motion of Member Paulus was seconded by Member Smith for adoption of the following proclamation: PROCLAMATION - CONSTITUTION WEEK WHEREAS, our Founding Fathers, in order to secure the blessings of liberty for themselves and their posterity, did ordain and establish a Constitution for the United States of America; and WHEREAS, it is of the greatest import that all citizens fully understand the provisions and principles contained in the Constitution in order to support it, preserve it and defend it against encroachment; and WHEREAS, the two hundred second anniversary of the signing of the Constitution provides an historic opportunity for all Americans to learn about and recall achievements of our Founders, and to reflect on the rights and privileges of citizenship, as well as its attendant responsibilities; and WHEREAS, the independence guaranteed to the American people by the Constitution should be celebrated by appropriate ceremonies and activities during Constitution Week, September 17 through 23, as designated by proclamation of the President of the United States of America in accordance with Public Law 915; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Frederick S. Richards, Mayor of the City of Edina, do hereby proclaim the week of September 17 through 23 as CONSTITUTION WEEK in the City of Edina, and urge all our citizens to pay special attention during that week to our Federal Constitution and the advantage of American citizenship. ADOPTED this 7th day of August, 1989. Receiving the proclamation on behalf of the Sanford Chapter, Daughters of the American Revolution was Florence Norback. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 19, 1989 APPROVED Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to approve the Council Minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 19, 1989. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. FINDINGS. DECISION AND REASONS - LOT 9. WHITE OAKS 2ND ADDITION CONTINUED TO 915/89 Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Smith to continue to September 5, 1989 the Findings, Decision and Reasons - Lot 9, White Oaks 2nd Addition as requested by the proponent. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT GRANTED FOR LOT 6. BLK 1. INDIAN HILLS WEST (6728 APACHE RD) Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Pursuant to due notice given, a public hearing was conducted on the request for vacation of a portion of the drainage and utility easement on Lot 6, Block 1, Indian Hills West (6728 Apache Rd). No public comment or objection was heard. Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the.following resolution: AV %1. RESOLUTION VACATING EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PURPOSES WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council, adopted the 10th day of'July, 1989, fixed a date for a public hearing on a proposed vacation of easement for drainage and utility purposes; and WHEREAS, two weeks' published and posted notice of said hearing was given and the hearing was held on the 7th day of August, 1989, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the public that said easement vacation be made; and WHEREAS, the Council has considered the extent to which the vacation affects existing easements within the area of the vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any persons, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric, telephone or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota that the following described portion of the drainage and utility easement be and is hereby vacated effective as of August 7, 1989: That part of Lot 6, Block 1, INDIAN HILLS WEST, according to the recorded plat thereof, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Lot 6; thence North 0 degrees O1 minutes 29 seconds West, assumed bearing, a distance of 30.00 feet along the east line of said Lot 6; thence South 89 degrees 58 minutes 31 seconds West a distance of 10.00 feet to an angle point in the westerly line of the drainage and utility easement as shown on said plat of INDIAN HILLS WEST and the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North 26 degrees 35 minutes 02 seconds West a distance of 13.20 feet along said westerly line; thence on a bearing of North a distance of 13.35 feet; thence on a bearing of West a distance of 6.68 feet to said westerly line; thence North 26 degrees 35 minutes 02 seconds West a distance of 19.96 feet along said westerly line; thence on a,bearing of North 15.26 feet; thence on a bearing of West a distance of 3.63 feet; thence on a bearing of North a distance of 7.15 feet; thence on a bearing of West a distance of 4.50 feet; thence on a bearing of North a distance of 12.76 feet; thence on a bearing of West a distance of 10.36 feet; thence on a bearing of South a distance of 3.17 feet to the southerly line of said drainage and utility easement; thence on a bearing of East a distance of 2.47 feet along said southerly line to an intersection with said westerly line of the drainage and utility easement; thence South 26 degrees 35 minutes 02 seconds East a distance of 83.87 feet along said westerly line to the point of beginning. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause a notice of completion of proceedings to be prepared, entered in the transfer record of the County Auditor and filed with the County Recorder, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851. Motion for adoption of the resolution carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. PERSONNEL ORDINANCE NO. 122 GRANTED FIRST READING Mayor Richards recalled that First Reading of the Personnel Ordinance No. 122 had been continued at the last - meeting and that staff was asked to provide information concerning the costs for the proposed changes in employee benefits. He referenced a memorandum dated August 7, 1989 from the Manager which explained the costs relating to the proposed changes in employee benefits for severance, vacation, terminal pay and parental leave. Discussion followed and Manager Rosland responded to questions on the proposed changes. Member Smith asked if the term "severance" referred to termination of an employee. Manager Rosland said it refers to employees that retire after 20 or more years with the City. Member Smith also asked if the proposed changes in benefits would bring the City of Edina in line with benefits of other municipalities. Manager Rosland recalled that the benefits study done a few years ago found Edina behind' on these issues and that these changes are proposed in response. Mayor Richards asked what would be the maximum exposure the City would incur for unused or accrued vacation when an employee leaves employment. Ceil Smith, Assistant to Manager, said the employee would be compensated for unused or accrued vacation not to exceed 240 hours (30 days). There would be some carry -over of vacation time as employees with over five continuous years of service would be asked to take a minimum of five days vacation per year, those with over ten years would have to take ten days, those with over fifteen years would have to take 15 days. Mayor Richards said he was concerned that an employee could accrue unused vacation and then at some point ask for a long vacation leave. He suggested that the ordinance indicate the maximum amount of vacation that could be taken in any one year. Member Rice asked what the dollar cost would be for the proposed vacation change. Manager Rosland explained that vacation is a funded liability and therefore the additional cost to the City is in a decrease in productive time of an employee of one additional day per year between the years 10 and 15. As employees move through the year and do not take vacation that becomes accrued vacation hours that are carried over, but the dollars are not necessarily carried over. Historically, however, when an employee retires and is paid for accrued vacation that is funded by back - filling the position at a lower rate of pay. Member Rice asked if productivity would suffer with giving the proposed additional vacation time. Manager Rosland said he did not foresee a drop in service level as the employees on duty would fill those voids where needed. Member Smith then offered Personnel Ordinance No. 122 for First Reading as presented and on file in the office of the City Clerk, subject to an addendum prior to adoption that the maximum amount of vacation that may be taken'each year would be five weeks. Motion for First Reading was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards First Reading granted. *BID AWARDED FOR PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT - MC GUIRE PARK Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for playground equipment for McGuire Park to recommended low bidder, Flanagan Sales, Inc., at $10,116.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR ARNESON HOUSE ADDITION Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for the Arneson House Addition to recommended low bidder, W.H. Cates Construction, Inc., at $206,466.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR RESURFACING OF TENNIS COURTS Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for resurfacing of tennis courts to recommended low bidder, Gopher State Sealcoat, Inc., at $9,600.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. REPORT ON METROPOLITAN COUNCIL POPUTATION ESTIMATES FOR CITY GIVEN The Council was advised that the Metropolitan Council has provided an estimate of the number of households and population for the City of Edina as of April 1, 1989, which estimates are used, among other things, to set levy limits for the City's budget. For 1989, even though the household count increased by 104 units, the population estimate declined by 1,130 persons. This was caused by reduction in the persons per household from 2.25 to 2.18 persons. This reduction is the largest seen in the last ten years and staff is in the process of challenging the new estimates which they feel are unrealistically large. Council will be advised of the outcome. No action was taken. SALLY MAYS APPOINTED TO COMMUNITY EDUCATION SERVICES BOARD Mayor Richards advised that two names have been submitted as candidates for appointment to the Community Education Services Board, Sally Mays and Rollie Ring. Member Smith said that he had been in contact with Mr. Ring who had indicated he could not make this commitment. Mayor Richards made a motion that Sally Mays be appointed to the Community' Education Services Board. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. PETITION FROM NEIGHBORS CONCERNING GRANDVIEW CEMETERY REFERRED TO STAFF Manager Rosland made reference to a petition from neighbors adjacent to Grandview Cemetery complaining about the dirt hauling operations of Harry Lindberry at Grandview Cemetery and the old vehicles and tires stored there. He recommended that this be referred to staff for investigation and possible prosecution. The Planning and Health Departments are looking into possible zoning and nuisance violations occurring at the cemetery. If pursued, the matter could end up in litigation as was the case a number of years ago. Robert Eaton, 419 Monroe Avenue, spoke in behalf of the neighbors. He said that during the past eight years a pile of black dirt has been rising on the cemetery property and that they were told about five years ago that it would end and would be leveled off. They have been unable to keep dirt and dust out of their homes even with air conditioning and have had to put up with the sounds of bulldozers. They object to Mr. Lindberry running a business in a residential area and in the midst of the cemetery and are asking the City to have that stopped. Joseph Chermak, 425 Adams Avenue, commented that the neighborhood has had to put up with the sound of diesels being started mornings. Mrs. Carl Anderson, 425 Jefferson Avenue, said that she lives across the street and that when the trucks exit they produce a cloud of dust which makes it impossible to hang out clothes or work in the garden. Mayor Richards recalled that the City has tried through previous litigation to solve the problem but was not successful. He suggested that the neighbors meet with staff to look at the pros and cons and what some of the alternatives are before the City considers taking legal action. Following discussion, it was informally agreed that this be referred to staff for input from the neighbors and that a recommendation be brought back to the Council as to possible action. 1989 NLC CONGRESS OF CITIES TO BE HELD AT ATIANTA ON NOVEMBER 25 -29 DISCUSSED Mayor Richards suggested that the Council consider the costs of attending the NLC Congress of Cities during the 1990 Budget Hearings and discuss whether anyone should attend at that time. HENNEPIN COUNTY TO CONSIDER PLASTIC BAN ORDINANCE; TESTIMONY SOUGHT Member Paulus said she had been contacted by Hennepin County advising that the county will be considering an ordinance dealing with plastics and are seeking support from elected officials who are in favor of an ordinance that would ban plastic packaging. Testimony will be taken at a public hearing on Thursday morning, August 10, at the Government Center. CONFUSION OF RESIDENTS ON PLACEMENT OF GARBAGE FOR PICKUP NOTED Member Paulus said that she had received numerous phone calls regarding residents who are confused about where garbage and recyclables should be placed for pickup. As a result some residents place their grass clippings, garbage and recyclables at the curb, sometimes several days in advance and there is objection to the resulting trashy look. Mayor Richards proposed that staff be directed to work with BFI on this problem and that BFI report back to the Council by August 21 if possible as to how this is being resolved. Further, that staff contact the garbage haulers to advise their customers that garbage containers are not to be placed at the curb. ODOR PROBLEM FROM SEWAGE PUMPING FACILITY AT 72ND AND OAKLAWN NOTED Member Rice referred to a letter dated July 15, 1989 from Daniel Petrosky, 7204 Oaklawn Avenue, concerning the odor problem from the sewage pumping facility at 72nd Street and Oaklawn and. asked if this is being handled. Manager Rosland said that staff has been in contact with Mr. Petrosky concerning the problem. RESIGNATION OF DEL JOHNSON FROM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION NOTED Member Rice referred to the letter dated July 25, 1989 from Del M. Johnson stating that he was resigning from the Community Development and Planning Commission because he is moving from the City. He asked if this would be an opportunity to reduce the number of members by not filling the position because of some concern that 11 members on the Commission is somewhat unwieldy. Mayor Richards said that the ordinance provides that there be 11 members on the Commission. As to the process for filling the position, he said that the Mayor makes the appointment with the consent of the Council. He suggested that Council Members submit names for this position to him by August-28 so that this matter could be placed on the September 5 Council Agenda. MICHAEL DUCAR LETTER CONCERNING TREE PLANTING PROGRAM TO BE DISCUSSED AT UPCOMING BUDGET HEARINGS Mayor Richards referred to the letter dated July 19, 1989 from Michael Ducar, 4616 Wooddale Avenue, concerning the lack of a tree planting program in the City and asked that this be considered at the upcoming budget hearings. MAYOR'S CORRESPONDENCE NOTED Mayor Richards noted receipt of the following correspondence: 1) Material from the Hennepin County Attorney referring to the recent 1989 Legislative Session, 2) Submittals required by law concerning the Fairview Southdale Hospital Revenue Bonds, 3) Report on inspection of City's jail facilities - Category checked was "good ", 4) News release announcing the opening of the National Childhood Grief Institute, a program -run out of Colonial Church in Edina. FUNDING REQUEST OF SHHSC TO BE HEARD AT BUDGET HEARING 8/8/89 Manager Rosland advised the Council that he had been contacted today by Larry Oppold, Executive Director of South Hennepin Human Services Council (SHHSC) concerning a request for additional funding of $2,000 to fund the position of a senior planner for the rest of 1989. Mr. Oppold was invited to bring that request to the 1990 Budget Hearing on August 8, 1989 when the SHHSC 1990 funding request is heard. FOCUS GROUP WORKING ON COMMUNICATIONS FORMAT Manager Rosland reported that a staff has been working with a focus group of residents to develop a communications budget for a format that would provide for some form of printed word, television program and - newsletter to get information out to the residents of the City. This will be funded by cable television revenues and a report will be made to the Council within the next few weeks., 1988 AUDIT FINDINGS DISCUSSED Finance Director John Wallin referred to the Auditor's Report on Compliance with the Provisions of the Legal Compliance Audit Guide for the recently completed 1988 City audit.which noted two non - compliance findings. He said that in speaking with the senior auditor it was her opinion that both findings were insignificant. He responded to the findings as follows: Finding No. 1 - One day during the year uninsured funds on deposit at a depository designated by Council exceeded 90% of the collateral assigned to the City (M.S. 118.01, subd. 2). Director Wallin explained that he is the treasurer of the Suburban Rate Authority (SRA) and keeps the organization's funds under the City's tax ID number. Checking and savings for the SRA at December 31, 1988 were sufficient to put the City over its collateral limit by about $3,000. Marquette Bank has been contacted and will raise the collateral assigned to the City by $100,000 which will then be brought to the Council for approval. Finding No. 2 - Claims paid prior to a Council meeting are not signed by a majority of the Council (M.S. 412.271, subd. 4). Director Wallin said that the statute states that when the City cannot defer payment of a claim until the next Council meeting without forfeiture of discount privileges, payment may be immediate if at least a majority of the Council members endorse an itemized claim for payment. Payment of the claim is then confirmed at the next Council meeting. He noted that the liquor stores receive about $50,000 a year in cash discounts that are due to paying liquor invoices within a week. The City also is required by the Federal government to transmit funds for the City's portion of FICA within three days after payroll. This has been the City's practice for a number of years and in order to be in compliance at least three Council Members would have to come in at least once a week to sign claims. The senior auditor said that other cities by -pass this requirement as well. Following some discussion it was informally agreed that the City continue to handle all claims as in the past. CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for to approve payment of the following claims as per pre -list dated August 7, 1989: General Fund $171,536.74, CDBG $475.00, Communications $298.75, Art Center $2,490.91, Capital Fund $5,131.32, Swimming Pool Fund $1,214.56, Golf Course Fund $38,686.41, Recreation Center Fund $7,146.44, Gun Range Fund $955.60, Edinborough Park $7,939.30, Utility Fund $238,013.07, Storm Sewer Utility $2,975.90, Liquor Dispensary Fund $1,831.12, Construction Fund $11,465.09, Total $490,160.21. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the meeting adjourned at 8:16 p.m. City Clerk �i O, REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland Agenda Item #11I. A. From: Philip S. Dommer Consent ❑ - Information Only ❑ Date: September 5, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: B- 89 -11, An appeal of ❑ To Council a decision by the Edina Board of Appeals and Action 0 Motion Adjustments to deny a request for a fence ❑ Resolution height variance ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: To deny a request for a fence height variance. Info /Background: On August 17, 1989, the Board of Appeals met to review a variance request to allow a six foot fence in the front yard. After reviewing submitted materials and hearing testimony from the homeowner, staff and neighbors, the Board unanimously voted to deny the request. The homeowner has exercised his right to appeal the Board's decision. Please refer to the attached information. 'r I S�►���q DRAFT B -89 -11 John E. Kalachnik 4114 Morningside Road Portions of Lot 66 Morningside Addition Zoning: R -1 Request: A two foot fence height variance to permit a six foot fence -in the front setback area. Mr. Dommer informed the Board the subject property is a corner lot at the intersection of Morningside Road and Grimes Avenue. The homeowner has constructed a six foot fence in the front yard area adjacent to the sidewalks. The height of fences permitted in this area is limited to four feet. Mr. Dommer added the subject property is situated such that there is very limited area on the lot which can be considered as private outdoor space. The fence is intended to provide privacy and security for the family. Mr. Dommer pointed out the lots to the north face Grimes Avenue. The area fenced in is adjacent to the front yards of these homes. The ordinance limiting -fence height to four feet is designed to preserve the streetscape of the homes to the north. Mr. Dommer concluded, explaining, in the material submitted by the proponent it is alleged that the Building Department gave permission to construct the fence as shown. Mr. Dommer added it would be unfortunate if this were true, however, staff still could not support the request. The fence is out of place and disrupts the streetscape of the adjoining properties. Some privacy and security still could be realized with a conforming fence without disruption to the neighborhood. Staff recommends denial of the request. Mr. Dommer noted that letters have been received by neighbors supporting the request and by one objecting to the request. The City was informed of the construction by two separate complaints. The proponents, Mr. and Mrs. Kalachnik, and interested neighbors were present. Mr. Bailey asked Mr. Dommer if there are any properties within the area that have fences of similar height. Mr. Dommer explained that there are a number of properties within the Morningside area that have fences six feet or over. He said similar fences within the area were erected before the Ordinance, and therefore, are "grandfathered" in. He added if those fences fall down they would have to be erected in compliance with the present Ordinance. Mrs. McClelland asked Mr. Kalachnik if the reason for the fence is to provide privacy for the new screened porch. Mr. Kalachnik responded that that is one reason, another reason is that the corner, in recent years has become busy, and they have two small children. Ms. Carol Franzen, 4225 Grimes Avenue, told the Board a number of the neighbors have a very real concern regarding the "clear view" area. She explained that vehicles approaching the intersection may not be able to see small children or other vehicles, which could cause an accident if the fence remains six feet in height. She said the safety issue is very important. Mr. Dommer explained to the Board and Ms. Franzen that the fence has been re- aligned and re- designed to accommodate the required "clear view" area. Mr. Lewis asked Mr. Kalachnik if the required four foot fence would grant the requested privacy. Mr. Kalachnik said privacy is a very real issue for his family and the proposed six foot fence meets this privacy need. Mr. Kalachnik said it is hard to get as comfortable a feeling of privacy with a four foot fence versus the privacy of a six foot fence. Mr. Kalachnik also asked the Board to note that he received permission from the Building Department to erect the fence. He added there is an issue of money lost, as a result of the misinformation received from the Building Department. Mr. Workinger asked Mr. Kalachnik if there are any other exits (besides the front door) from the home. Mr. Kalachnik explained the house has a rear or back door, but the rear or back yard is only five feet deep. Mr. Workinger questioned Mr. Dommer if Mr. Kalachnik could plant a hedge six feet high or over on his property line. Mr. Dom mer answered that vegetation can be any height except in the clear view area. That area, at all times, must comply with the clear view requirements. Ms. Franzen pointed out to the Board that the proposed fence is to be erected on top of a small retaining wall that at some points is two feet high. She added that a four foot fence, in reality, would be six feet where the retaining wall is two feet high. Mr. Workinger agreed with Ms. Franzen's observation about the retaining wall, noting that a four foot fence on the retaining wall would allow reasonable use of the area. Mr. Workinger continued that the proposed six foot fence violates the openness of the neighborhood. Members of the Board agreed, and therefore, could not support the proposed six foot fence, adding they would like Mr. Kalachnik to erect the fence within the guidelines of the Ordinance. Mrs. McClelland explained to Mr. Kalachnik that it unfortunate there was a misunderstanding with the Building Department, but this Board must make a decision regardless of that misunderstanding. She said the consensus of the Board is that the fence is to be erected in compliance with the Ordinance of the City. She informed Mr. Kalachnik that upon denial of his request he can appeal the decision to the City Council. Mr. Workinger moved to deny the variance request for a two foot fence height variance to permit a six foot fence in the front yard setback. Mr. Bailey seconded the motion. Ayes, McClelland, Bailey, Lewis, Bentley, Workinger. Motion carried. City Clerk City of Edina 4801 West 50th Strret Edina, MN 55424 Dear Sir : August 24, 1989 As outlined over the phone to me by Phil Dommer on August 18 and reiterated in the attached letter, I am formally appealing to the City Council the rejection of my variance request by the Board of Appeals and Adjustments on August 17. The case number is B- 89 -11. My appeal is based -argon the following factors. 1. The Board was con This is erroneous for two reasons. First, both immediate neighbors and all but one area neighbor signed a statement that they had no objection to the 6 foot fence. The concern of the one neighbor who objected revolved around snow and freezing gates which are not relevant to a 6 versus 4 foot fence. Second, a number of houses in the immediate area have 6 foot fences which are clearly visible from the street, run along the sidewalk or street, or are on corner lots. A partial list is as follows : 4209 Grimes, 4200 Morningside, 4101 West 45th -4508 Grimes, 4501 Wooddale, 4048 Sunnyside- 4418 Curve Ave., 4014 Sunnyside -4409 Curve Ave., 4115 Wooddale, and 4316 Eton Place. Therefor, if the neighbors say the character of the neighborhood is not effected and if there are ample numbers of similiar fences in the immediate area, the character of the neighborhood is not effected. 2. The a E Please note that this neighbor signed a no objection to the 6 foot fence. If this neighbor has no concern with his sale and if any new buyer sees the fence when determining to buy, I fail to see why the Board would be concerned. Mr. Bailey is a competent adult who can make his own determinations as to if the fence will effect the sale of the-house. Any buyer is a competent adult who can make their determination to buy based upon the fact a fence is present. 3. The Board claimed they did not want to set a precedent by granting the variance. The Board has granted other variances related to fences and heights. If the claim is that there could not be a precedent for this variance, why bother to have a variance process at all in this area? Why suddenly is a precedent set in this case when others have been granted? 4. Undue hardship, I went through a number of steps to insure that my plan would meet City concerns including a survey, checking with neighbors, and checking with City Hall to make sure my plan was appropriate and no ordinances would be broken. I proceeded with my plan only after the City assurred me that my plan was appropriate and that I was breaking no ordinances. Converting the fence will now cost me at least another $1050.00. My plight is unique to the property and circumstances related to the project, As noted above, the essential character of the neighborhood is not effected. 5. Privacy. We have no privacy or back yard. We have a porch we like to use. Morningside and Grimes has become a very busy and noisy corner the last three years. We have two small children, ages 4 and 7. I have attached to this letter the following items: the area neighbor's signatures with no objection to the 6 foot fence, my August 18 letter to Mr. Dommer, and the August 17 Board agenda. I have also attached my notes from April 26. Included with the letter but seperate, I have sent my July 25 letter to Mr. Rosland regarding the case. Thank you for your consideration, and I look forward to appearing before the Council on Sepember 5, 1989• Sincerely, ohn Kalachnik 114 Morningside Road Edina, MN 55416 934 -4100, 209 925 -4315 cc. Phil Dommer, Senior Planner Ken Rosland, City Manager Ron Rollins, Attorney JJU�?-. ,,�•i7�ic,0 S /�/ /�vCr svaJ�- ��'1ldY% ���' �U�/it�l� �uy�r� v�G� REQUEST FOR VARIATION TO BE PRESENTED TO THE EDINA BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS. NEIGHBORHOOD SIGNATURES REGARDING THE KALACHNIK REQUEST. We have been told that the fence we are constructing on our property must be .4 feet in height versus the 6 feet thought appropiate. The reason for this is that we are a corner lot. The only way to be able to construct the 6 foot fence is to apply for a variation. Application instructions note we are encouraged to obtain neighbor- hood statements of "no objection to the variance." We are requesting the variation because of : (1) no backyard due to being a corner lot; (2) no privacy due to the corner lot; (3) the amount of traffic, both auto and pedestrian, at the corner; (4) two small children, ages 4 and 7, who need,a safe private place to play. The cost to us to convert the fence from 6 feet to 4 feet will be $1075.00 if the variation is rejected. We hope you will sign this. We hope that we have been improving our home and property over the years so that both the neighborhood is improved and your feklings to- ward living in the neighborhood are improved. A notice will be sent regarding the variance hearing to neighbors within 200 feet of us. Thank you for your consideration. WE THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE "NO OBJECTION TO THE VARIATION" FOR 16 FOOT FENCE AT THE KALACHNIK'S. A CLEAR VIEW AREA AT THE STOP SIGN WILL BE MET ACCORDING TO CITY ORDINANCE. NAME ADDRESS DATE v o 1 LT Vy John Bailey • 4247 Grimes Avenue South o Edina, MN 55416 (612) 927 -0374 i August 13, 1989 CITY OF EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT Zoning Board of Appeals and.Adjustments 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Fence Height Variance (Lot 66, Morningside Addition) Auger, 1989 Hearing To Whom It May Concern: This is to let you know that as owners of the property adjoining 4114 Morningside,,Rd., Edina, we have no objection to John Kalachnik building a six -foot fence along the north- ern side of his property which adjoins ours located 4247 Grimes Avenue South. This note is in response to your notice for a public hearing on August 17. Thank you. Sincerely, John Bailey A G E N D A EDINA BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS THURSDAY, AUGUST 17, 1989, AT 5:30 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM MEMBERS SCHEDULED TO ATTEND: Chair, Helen McClelland, John Bailey, Mike Lewis, Geof Workinger and James Bentley I. NEW BUSINESS: B -89 -11 John E. Kalachnik 4114 Morningside Road Portions of Lot 66, Morningside Request: A two foot fence height variance to permit a six foot fence in the front setback area B -89 -12 Dan E. Kester 4015 West 54th Street The W. 75' of the Nk of the NEI of the NEI of the NEI of Section 19, Township 28, Range 24 Request: A two foot sideyard setback variance to expand a single garage and a two foot sideyard setback variance for ° additional living space. B -89 -13 Eugene R. Anderson 406 Jefferson Avenue South Lot 4, Block 10, West Minneapolis Heights Request: A three foot sideyard setback variance to add second story living space. B -89 -14 Target Stores 7000 York Avenue South Lot 1, Block 2, Yorktown Request: A 46 stall parking stall variance, a.10 foot setback variance and a variance to permit compact spaces in lieu of full size spaces. B -89 -15 The Cradle Club 4815 West 77th Street Tract F, RLS 1050 Request: A 20 foot setback variance to install a six foot fence around a childcare play area 15 feet from W. 77th St. II. NEXT MEETING DATE: Thursday, September 7, 1989 at 5:30 p.m. III. ADJOURNMENT: Philip S. Dommer Senior Planner City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 August 18, 1989 Thank you for the phone conversation this morning, August 18. While I was disappointed by the City rejection of my variance request last night on August 17, I do wish to thank you for your professional courtesy during this process. As I promised, listed below are the items we discussed over the phone today and my requests. If any of these are not representative of our talk, please let me know. 1. When I asked about appeals material if I decide to go to the City Council, you told me the formal procedure was to write a letter to the City Clerk describing my appeal and case number. This must be within 10 days. If I would like this heard at the Sept..5 meeting, I must get the material in by August 24. I have no problems with these deadlines. 2. Please send me a formal letter of variance denial. You said a standard form to this effect would go out such that I -would receive it about Wednesday, August 23. 3. I asked for the specific reasons for the denial in written form. You said these were in the committee minutes which would not be typed up and approved for about 2 months due to a committee change over. However, I could get a copy of the draft minutes in about 2 to 3 weeks depending on the secretary's work load. I understand the draft is not formally approved, and changes could occur. In relation to this, you noted my requests for specific denial reasons and names of people speaking would be included from the transcript resulting from the recording of the meeting. There may be some missed comments due to several people speaking at once. A copy of the approved committee minutes is requested when this is formally done in the future. 4. Please formally advise my attorney of the denial per his request in his attached August 4 letter to Mr. Rosland. 5. Should I decide not to appeal and convert the fence from 6 to 4 feet, this will begin on or about August 23 with the subcontractor. I have represented to you the fence is on my property. I will send you a plot drawing should one be made. Given the fence and it's current location is on my property, the fence and location are appropriate given : (a) a 30 foot clear view from the-curb intersection is maintained (30 feet up form triangle, be sure and diagonal), and (b) 4 feet in height other behind the front of my north on Grimes. We wi: each curb, draw a line to fence is behind the triangle convert the 6 foot fence to then the small section neighbor's house to the L1 call if (a) is in any doubt. 6. At about 12:30 pm today, regarding building permits,. I informed Ken Bechler and Elizabeth Sedgewick of Beckler Landscape, 12850 Wayzata Blvd, Minnetonka, MN, 55343, 933 -9944, 538- 7878(beeper) to send you a plan of the porch and deck constructed. Specific questions regarding the actual construction can be made from the subcontractor Mike Reinert who is also doing the fence. Upon receit of the plan (or problems), please advise me of my subsequent duty required.and the time by which you would like to see such done. Thank you for your time and information. I look forward to working with you to meet Planning Department concerns. Sincerely, J hn E. Kalachnik 114 Morningside Road Edina, MN 55416 LOCATION _ ■ VIII VIII IIII�1 IIIII� �■ ■�� men== III._ � ■�����ii�111�i1rr ' �- VARIANCE NUMBER B -89 -11 L O C A T 10 N 4114 Morningside Road REQUEST A two foot fence height variance to permit a six foot fence in the front yard setback area. EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT EDINA BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS STAFF REPORT AUGUST 17, 1989 B -89 -11 John E. Kalachnik 4114 Morningside Road Portions of Lot 66 Morningside Addition Zoning: R -1 Request: A two foot fence height variance to permit a six foot fence in the front setback area. The subject property is a corner lot at the intersection of Morningside Road and Grimes Avenue. The homeowner has constructed a six foot fence in the front yard area adjacent to the sidewalks. The height of fences permitted in this area is limited to four feet. The subject property is situated such that there is very limited area on the lot which can be considered as private outdoor space. The fence is intended to provide privacy and security for the family. The lots to the north face Grimes Avenue. The area fenced in is adjacent to the front yards of these homes. The ordinance.limiting fence height to four feet is designed to preserve the streetscape of the homes to the north. Recommendationn: In the material submitted by the proponent it is alleged that the Building Department gave permission to construct the fence as shown. It would be unfortunate if this were true, however, the staff still could not support the request. The fence is out of place and disrupts the streetscape of the adjoining properties. Some privacy and security still could be realized with a conforming fence without disruption to the neighborhood. Staff recommends denial of the request. PLANNING DEPARTMENT�,;+� Q s xCaseNumber CITY OF . y.1r .. - Date'. PA EDIN y ,% ' Fee `Paid ,, r 4801 WEST FIFTIETH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424` . -, : _ __ r -_ n - end- ;." +S�a -" +. t iY9 i,..s - . `it�c :. ±•�: P _ 4 _ ' -. P' a+. - -• Y � i b; i�'.l,,�it i�j 612)'9 2 7A3 : «:,1>i+.�' 1t �+F�4• • ,.:..., ^. -..; _�v .'...- ....aria: V,.�•as:r aJrtdfC7. s�VftC'(: �.. xG�' s-• h. ��' .��a+4arf`��¢►1�iIGl�'i��?3R4•_ pplication for: F -(.4, [ ] LOT DIVISION [ ] CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT [ ] REZONING [ ] FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN pQ VARIANCE [ ] PLAN AMENDMENT. [ l PLAT Proposed Name APPLICANT • Name John E. Kalachnik r M' 4114 Morningside Ro d t,.�q t" �•=_ ,ew , Address' ;a rr r -r. Edina, 3M 55416 Phone (612 ) 92;5= 4315` fh; . John E. Kalachnik PROPERTY Name OWNER: 4114 Morningside Road Address e .:.�.. (If Different = 5 - 612 925 = 4315 -.(h� ` Edina MN �5 416 from Above) Phone '( =410n. Legal Description of Propertyy The South'S0 Meet of? the Wast 1470" feet 66, Morningside, accordin _;plat: thereof and situate in Hennepin .County,` °Min 1 � +(+•r'ti''^ � � � w Am. :. �. 4a .,.._: ?:4. F" lftp k•.a*"�S a� dnafMN j4� 1�6�� Property Address 4114a Morningside: -Ro d, :E ; , .� -55 ��_ L Residential r x' pI -D.`# 07- 028024 Present Zoning - "Explanation of Request: `Request -for `6 -foot fence for ,privacy`purposesti:�� -for,' .t:.,. r .... -E` :.. ...w..._ N _ i. ^`�.' =i: FC.- iya• , -ti 6 yet. ,' 1- a7�,``Y�t, a 1 s. a nd ..variance from corner 'lot 4 foot ~limit:''Please see .additional .: �s �W:,.,:• s::.F�•...,.�:4a .M•,._ ��. ,fir y,��l -r �5,)ifsi.L:,•_.: Ong !.:,L•.`.�%$a�7,•'fFgl-,;.su� r b � ��GCt Z. -'�- � � a tpages for.':details i:'l+. t .- `f'Ftt,, __ r .. t•'' iL �1 .i._ v.T�.1 l'�G: (Use reverse -side or additional pages"if. necessary) {:► •��`? ••.:�a � � � c^''� f:.f(•��} y r r�� f f :.;, _ r y��, ?,'+` �e`•` die,�r��t':6iu��y��;�l�p��.yi,� v •. - •.s,fyl it:��Y. 1' -1',l a..W. {:S!.%.. C J +w 4•� -!c .,r ' ".i7• -Tk.. - W �t ' not applicable ''to "this; case - phoneY w:p ,�,�,, e,��ARCHITECT ,,..,Name r�����s� �:a,=..>•�•;.��•'>���::�+,��� k�J ti � ♦ �f.F.� 11.�' t Lye .v„ a t�S�'�ir1i. -a `f P �Survey"In eerir 61 tx�:�'SURVEYOR.�' z -Name �.... . •.rav�c �urn►sf,, one..,- ;d( '3• .�!, '19�'Si�la _.i� � �� CY• aV.�a M 6tVa a. ` 4 Y '7 t •� - •�u• (:,�TfJrF, ! �s9�'F,i�3 `� AA tv.nwnPrls,•sGnature 500 - ant's ignatu're REQUEST FOR VARIANCE This request is respectfully made in the spirit of the zoning ordinance as listed in the variance information with this application. Strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause our family undue hardship because of the following : (1) we have no back yard due to a corner lot; (2) we have no privacy due to the corner of.Morning- side and Grimes being a busy corner with both traffic and pedestrian use; (3) we have two small children, ages 4 and 7, who were once approached by strangers and need a safe place to play; (4) the essential character of the neighborhood is-maintained. In addition, my plight is due to circumstances unique to my property which were not created by myself. I have taken steps to inform my neighbors of.my intentions and received no objections, I conducted a survey to insure the fence would be on my property, neither neighbor's house is effected by the fence in an adverse manner, I informed and obtained approval from the City of Edina for my plan, and I have cooperated with the City to meet safety standards once I was told a clear view area must be maintained. TWhile economic considerations alone do not constitute an undue hard- ship, based upon the above and the fact it will cost $1075.00 to convert the partially completed fence from 6 feet to 4 feet, a hardship is incurred. Please note the fence was built at 6 feet based upon City of Edina approval in April, the fence stopped and no further work done until the proper procedures followed, and some boards taken down to meet concerns regarding a clear view. My request does not include any variation for the clear view requirement. I have enclosed my July 25, 1989 letter to Kenneth Rosland which provides the essential details of my request. I have attached photographs of the neighborhood. I have enclosed better drawings of the,project then the ones in my letter to Mr. Rosland. Please note the following attachments in my July 25 letter. ATTACHMENT 1. April 28, 1989. Note from to the north-on Grimes. I talked to him and told them of my project including tl No objections were noted then or during The note has to do with the overhanging my neighbor and his wife Ze 6 foot fence. the summer. trees (see photo () on my property which required cutting for a 6 foot fence. A 4 foot fence would not require such discussion. ATTACHMENT 2. July 25. Drawing of fence project. ATTACHMENT 3. April 8. Contract with fence price. ATTACHMENT 4. April 27. Signed contract for fence. ATTACHMENT 5. May 8. Bill for survey done. ATTACHMENT 6. July 25. Current status of fence completion. ATTACHMENT 7. July 19. Copy of letter from Mr. Dommer. ATTACHMENT 8. July 25. Copy of my response to Mr. Dommer. ATTACHMENT 9. April 25. Copy of my notes from City Hall visit when I inquired as to ordinances and regulations. Please note item # 3 in which I specifically asked about future problems, ordinances, etc. and the approval and information provided to me. The envelope is provided only to show the time frame of my inquiry into this matter. ATTACHMENT 10. July 20. Copy of cost estimate to completely remove the fence. ATTACHMENT 11. July 20. Copy of cost estimate to convert the present 6 foot fence to 4 feet. ATTACHMENT 12. (seperate from July 25 letter). Pictures of property. ATTACHMENT 13. (seperate from July 25 letter). Better drawings of project, current status, and proposed variance. I would like to state that I make this request in the most humble and respectful manner. I hope that my actions both before the project was started and after the City made their concerns known in July show my good faith efforts to cooperate and resolve this matter for all parties concerned. I am committed to the community of Edina and to improve the community through property efforts and my own professional career. Kenneth Rosland page one of four City Manager City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, 14N 55424 July 25, 1989 Dear Mr. Rosland : I am writing this letter to you based upon the recommendation of Phil Dommer, Senior Planner, with whom I met on July 17. On July 17, the City of Edina informed me that a 6 foot fence I was having built on my property must be removed from some areas and altered in others. As backround, I live at 4114 Morningside Road, Edina, MN, 55416, which is the northeast corner of the intersection of Morningside Road and Grimes Avenue. There is a four way stop sign at this corner. The formal location is, "The south 50 feet of the west 140 feet of lot 66, Morningside, according to the recorded plot thereof..." My home faces Morningside. I have a neighbor to the east who also faces Morningside. I have a neighbor to the north who faces Grimes. I have owned the property since March, 1984, and have invested $25,000 to improve what was a deteriorating piece of property so that the neighborhood and City of Edina =is improved. I am a Research Scientist for the State of Minnesota and have been since 1979• I contracted to have a 6 foot fence built since we have no pri- vacy, the corner is busy with the traffic, we have two small children ages 4 and 7, the neighbor to the east is at the far side and out of site of the fence, and the neighbor to the north's driveway is on the other side of his property. In addition, I told the neighbor to the north of my plans, including the fence at 6 feet, because of his trees overhanging onto 'my property which required cutting in order to put the fence in. I have provided Attachment 1 to support this. The fence was to run from the .southwest corner of my house to Morningside, along Morningside to the corner, along Grimes to the property line with the neighbor to the north on Grimes,.and back up to the northwest corner of my. house. I have provided Attachment 2 which shows this. Attachment 3 shows the fence,price, Attachment 4 shows the signed contract, and Attachment 5 show a survey I did to insure the fence would be completely on my property. The fence was started on July 12. The fence was worked on to this point : 6 feet high form my house to Morningside, 6 feet high along Morningside to the corner, 6 feet high along Grimes, the posts set and horizontal beams built along the property line with my neighbor north on Grimes, and the 6 foot high section and.gate on-this line at the very last 10 feet or so which are behind the imaginary line which runs from the front of his house across my property. On July 17 Mr. Dommer informed me that : (1) there had to be a clear view area at the corner of Morningside and Grimes, . _ „-:. and (2) the fence could not be line which runs from the font than 4 other than behind an imaginary ine of my neighbor's house across my property. I had the workmen remove the fence boards from the clear view area although the fence posts remain due to the project being on hold until this matter is resolved. Attachment 6 shows the current status of the fence. Succinctly�_,thefence has been built at 6 feet from my house to Morningside, along Morningside, and along Grimes. The post holes and posts are set along the property line with the neighbor to the north. A small section of fence is finished along the back of this line. What has not been done is the diagonal on my property (to. insure site line /clear view yet give me privacy) and the majority of the line with the neighbor to the north. I have met with Mr. Dommers on July 17 and July 24. I also talked with him on the phone several times on July 17 and twice on _ July 20. He has written .me a letter on July 19 (Attachment 3). My response to him dated July 25 is Attachment 8. What has been established to this point and what we agree on is as follows. (1) The current location of the fence is appropiate and can be 4 feet in height from the land where the posts are set other then for the posts in the clear view area. (2) I am willing to remove, and have done so, the fence from the clear view area and build a diagonal across my property .-to insure the clear view area is met. (3) The fence behind the front of my neighbor's house on the Grimes side may remain at 6 feet and is not effected. As I told Mr. Dommer, as I am now teeling desirentoas evidanyeor- by my good faith actions above, I have dinances and wish to solve this situation in the least expensive, and convenient manner to all parties. This is where the problem comes in. Before I began to finalize this project, I did not wish to break any ordinances. I did not want the situation which is occurring now to occur. In order to insure I was doing the right steps I had a survey done as mentioned above. On April 25, 1989 from 9:25 to 9:40 a.m., I was at City Hall on 50th Street. I specifically asked City employees to direct me to the appropiate people so that I could check ordinances and to be sure I was not breaking any rules in building my fence. I was specifically told by John Schirmang that my plan.was OK, which was drawn out for.him: and orally eXplained in detail as I am telling you now. Attachment 9 presents my notes in detail. Please note item 13 where I sDecificallv asked what if someone-questioned the fence. He said "Tell them John aDproved it". He said I don t see any roblems with you r lP an. I specifically asked him his last name so I could be sure I had documentation and approval for my plan in case something arose. Please note that nothing was said about a 4 foot fence and nothing was said about a clear view , despite my inquiry as to breaking any ordinances. I related the above to Mr. Dommer on July 17 and, after consulting with my attorney, provided Mr. Dommer a copy of Attachments 39 4, and 9. I told Mr. Dommer I had no desire to break any ordinances, wished to comply, but, given the City of Edina's information provided to me on April 25 and upon which I based my decisions, I wanted reimbursement for the required changes. In short, if the City of Edina had provided me the correct information on April 25, as I requested, I would not have built the fence as it is. and the current situation would not have arisen. This letter, therefore, is to formally request, reinbursement for the changes I am being required to make by the City in my fence. The request is made respectfully and is based upon my good faith actions as described above. It is also based upon the fact that a citizen of Edina who pays taxes for public servants to provide him with accurate information is not responsible for costs incurred to correct erroneous information the City has provided him with and upon which he acted in good faith. - While I can certainly understand the problems in keeping track of all the items a city faces, I as a citizen am not responsible for internal problems in dealing with information requests and cannot be held to pay for a correction the City requires of information it provided me. I have considered three options. The first would be to totally remove the fence. This would cost $500.00 to actually remove the fence plus the $2464.00 to build the fence which I owe to the contractor. The total requested, therefor, is $2964.00. Please see Attachment 10 for the workmen's cost to remove the fence plus Attachment 3 which shows the original cost of the fence. This request is based upon the fact that I would not have contracted for the fence had I been provided the correct information on April 25 plus the cost of now removing the result of the product of that information. The second option would be to convert the existing 6 foot fence to a 4 foot fence. The cost for this would be $1075.00. Please see Attachment 11 for the workmen to do this. The third option would be to obtain a varience and keep the 6 foot fence. In this option the only item would be for the workmen to dig new post holes so that the diagonal across my property is built to insure the clear view. The remaining portions could be completed and no additional cost is incurred. The existing portions are already built. With this option no cost would be incurred by the City..since the work would be covered by the contract at $2464.00 in Attachment 3 which I am to pay the contractor upon completion of the job. As I said earlier, I wish to reconcile this matter as easily, conveniently, and . inexpensively for all parties concerned. I want to follow safety ordinances. I have no wish to confront the City of which I am proud and have chosen to live. Therefor, I formally request $1075.00 to convert the fence from 6 feet to 4 feet.:.I am-.- willing to accept a varience and pay for the costs of the diagonal to insure the site line and application fee for the varience. El I have requested my attorney to also write you on this matter. Also, for the record, please consider this lettercLformal inquiry as to my options regarding this matter should a time limit be involved during which time I must start procedures or lose the right to do so. I thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to resolving this issue. Sincerely, e E hn E. E. Kalachnik 114 Mcorningside Road Edina, MN 55416 925-4315 (h). 934-4100 (w) cc. Phil Dommer, Senior Planner Ron Rollins, Attorney Attachments 1 through 11 If A %mimes AVE ca S I ,4 Wil I Caw S*,&(V &AVISSI MEMAN nA0jQQ1rJ6-S1br: ROAD ---VAR JANCE lREGuEs i imm000tt To EAI T Alm onvati- floirsiot n\ 0 (Z N ICU "i M 6-OR � fv%A--'5 -,-L) - - - - - -- -- -- - _ -fit � g:x.� ,�_' --- 0 n �-Vxuf- -MA - I r4AK CC7 ATiACMmENT I Nvi f:Aom "IMES I WOW EA -q:rJCE A . #V 0 . PRO 1 tc T, 2A 67�IM 19 VI-,IW6, m Z� r, t X O Al s roP SIbN T. Z c ��►N FoR ROLE m I6wtls5 y - l)61914N /Inc -s .gvNvvC- H IJ:N•�p FtMf � ••roGo* -'' o �) 7t! Ir, a o •J'Ge Fi�crN�- � a� I � IT o D I �: A LANDSCAPE, INC. QUOTATION 12850 Wayzata Blvd. 6Q 1" 3 0) U t u 4354 Minnetonka, MN 55343 ` Phone 933 -9944 47S' � 3r Oqv) Prepared For�CdE+l� l J �1�L i� 1�V��4- 1�(1�� Date 4 " ' Address 4I I �lb�NwC- r51jam, DR Home Tel. No. City 171 KA MN• Zip Code Bus. Tel. No. Landscape Consultant ❑ Deliver ❑ Pick Up ❑ Taken ❑ Replacement ❑ Landscape Sale ❑ Paid Mark "X" in right box. OUAN I MATERIALS SIZE EACH TOTAL 1 C No wA. 75. CO 17 1. c O 2-4(04. O� Z/ cc of s -rte 1 1 kc 2 T u G i v Fr 001 C i ATTACHE T_ 3: i i QJOM11O n) CI NI TRA c" A ± f t =+ gZa4,Voal LANDSCAPE, INC. 12850 Wayzata Blvd. Minnetonka, MN 55343 Phone 933 -9944 ORDER FORM AND CONTRACT Purchaser: Street Address: i i `i- \c,K r,,, � �=; �� c F-' City, State, Zip Code Date: TERMS AND CONDITIONS: Telephone: (Work) (Home) C.' A T ACHAIIEtv'T 1i 510-web cO NM&T' Bechler Landscape, Inc. ( "Bechler ") hereby agrees to st FbA Nte signed customer as outlined in the proposal above, and the ci tract, and hereby agrees to purchase the product and sery 1 and conditions: A#0 nder- con- terms 1. Payment is to be made as follows: % down upon the start of work and the balance uporfcompletion. Bechler will file lien and bond claims as necessary within the prescribed periods for its own protection and will pro- vide waivers upon payment in full. An additional charge to the customer will be made for the costs, including interest and reasonable attorneys fees, of all collection expenses incurred by Bechlerwhether based on this con- tract, lien, bond or collection procedure. In the event payment in full is not received within ten (10) days of comple- tion, a FINANCE CHARGE will be assessed on the unpaid balance at the rate of 1.5% per month or the highest amount permitted by law. (ANNUAL PERCENTAGE rate of 18 %). 2. Subject to the conditions herein, Bechler warrants against death for a period of 12 months, all trees, shrubs, evergreens, and nursery stock which it has planted in the ground pursuant to this Agreement. This warranty does not apply to items which are planted in containers above ground. This warranty is only valid if your account is paid in full, you are the original purchaser and you have followed our planting, maintenance, watering and winter pro- tection instructions. Bechler reserves the right to inspect the plants involved in any warranty claim and to suggest corrective measures as part of its warranty program. Bechler makes no warranty on replaced plants or trees, or for damages caused by animals, children, sun scald, frost cracks, acts of God, unseasonai weather conditions, van- dalism, snow removal, lawn mowers or other garden equipment or for damage caused by failure to follow Bechler's recommended maintenance programs. Plant failure must be reported during the warranty period and proof of purchase is required. The buyer's remedies under this warranty are limited to return of the plant and replacement thereof on one occasion only. BECHLER MAKES NO WARRANTIES OTHER THAN THOSE SPECIFICALLY SET FORTH HEREIN. 3: Only the materials and labor specified in this contract are being provided by Bechler. Any alteration or devia- tion from the above specifications involving extra costs or any additional materials or labor will be provided only upon the receipt of executed written orders which will become an extra charge over and above contract price set forth herein. All agreements are contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our control. Customeragrees to carry fire, tornado and other necessary insurance. Our workers are fully covered by workmans' compen- sation insurance. BECHLER LANDSCAPE, INC. TERMS AND CONDITIONS: 5161VEb CONMAZr FVg pjtf�� Bechler Landscape, Inc. ( "Bechler") hereby agrees to st inder- signed customer as outlined in the proposal above, and the ci con- tract, and hereby agrees to purchase the product and sery terms and conditions: j 1. Payment is to be made as follows: ~ 7C % down upon the start of work and the balance upon completion. Bechler will file lien and bond claims as necessary within the prescribed periods for its own protection and will pro- vide waivers upon payment in full. An additional charge to the customer will be made for the costs, including interest and reasonable attorney's fees, of all collection expenses incurred by Bechler whether based on this con- tract, lien, bond or collection procedure. In the event payment in full is not received within ten (10) days of comple- tion, a FINANCE CHARGE will be assessed on the unpaid balance at the rate of 1.5% per month or the highest amount permitted by law. (ANNUAL PERCENTAGE rate of 18 %). 2. Subject to the conditions herein, Bechler warrants against death for a period of 12 months, all trees, shrubs, evergreens, and nursery stock which it has planted in the ground pursuant to this Agreement. This warranty does not apply to items which are planted in containers above ground. This warranty is only valid if your account is paid in full, you are the original purchaser and you have followed our planting, maintenance, watering and winter pro- tection instructions. Bechler reserves the right to inspect the plants involved in any warranty claim and to suggest corrective measures as part of its warranty program. Bechler makes no warranty on replaced plants or trees, or for damages caused by animals, children, sun scald, frost cracks, acts of God, unseasonal weather conditions, van- dalism, snow removal, lawn mowers or other garden equipment or for damage caused by failure to follow Bechler's recommended maintenance programs. Plant failure must be reported during the warranty period and proof of purchase is required. The buyer's remedies under this warranty are limited to return of the plant and replacement thereof on one occasion only. BECHLER MAKES NO WARRANTIES OTHER THAN THOSE SPECIFICALLY SET FORTH HEREIN. 3. Only the materials and labor specified in this contract are being provided by Bechler. Any alteration or devia- tion from the above specifications involving extra costs or any additional materials or labor will be provided only upon the receipt of executed written orders which will become an extra charge over and above contract price set forth herein. All agreements are contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our control. Customer agrees to carry fire, tornado and other necessary insurance. Our workers are fully covered by workmans' compen- sation insurance. BECHLER LANDSCAPE, INC. BY Its 4. YOU, YOU, THEBUYER, MAYCANCELTHISTRANSACTIONATANYTIMEPRIORTOMIDNIGHTOFTHETHIRD BUSINESS DAY AFTER THE DATE OF THIS TRANSACTION. SEE ATTACHED NOTICE OF CANCELLATION FORM FOR AN EXPLANATION OF THIS RIGHT. NOTE: This proposal is hereby withdrawn by Bechler Landscape, Inc. if not accepted within ZQ days. The above prices, specifications, and conditions are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as,outlined above. 7 1 , r� f•, , ;/ Accepted by: Date: : '-Customer READ REVERSE SIDE BEFORE SIGNING ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. 5811 Cedar Lake Road, Minneapolis, MN 55416 Phone 541 0500 INVOICE John Kalachnik T OCHMEN T 4114 Morningside Road. Edina, Mn 55416 May 8, 1989 Services: Surveying services at above address Basis: As per quotation FEE: $ 200.00 Terms: Net due upon .receipt PR+7W16'10 5uldvEy Accounts over 30 days are subject to a finance charge of 1.5% per month. THANK YOU � -7"' �iF �s- -�r�T- �'�7'"'�� _l'"'F""►' �-'T'- �s�T mgr- T-'ss��+r � CHECK HERE IF TAX t0d(tEy REM 0 JOHN E. KALACHNIK $ �JJ K- 425 -429- 178 -929 -��- 4114 MORNINGSIDE �� FORD BAL f EDINA, MN 55416 � _BALANCE DEPOSR 0 0 AnICAm coaaENo SiAiVS 670 M �5 1V(�/vC- E in CITY OF EDINA )1 WEST 50TH STREET. EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 o12- 927 -8861 July 19, 1989 John and Debby Kalachnik 4114 Morningside Drive Edina, " 55410 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Kalachnik: (612) 927 -8861 KENNETH ROSLAND CITY MANAGER ��:A..i f CRY OF °�e s �n EDINA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 Thank you for your continuing cooperation regarding your fence. As we discussed, the fence is in violation of Ordinances 1402 and 825.7. It constitutes a traffic hazard and must be removed immediately. Should you decide to replace the fence, please maintain the "Clear View" area defined in Ordinance 1402 of which I have given you a copy. Please also recall that only fences four feet or less in height are permitted" in all areas on your lot; west of your northerly neighbors house front' extended south, and south of the easterly neighbors front extended west. I would be happy to meet with your contractor on site to explain these parameters. Please have them schedule an appointment in advance. Please also contact the Edina Building Department to apply for permits for the other construction work at the home. Since the work is already completed, please anticipate a double fee for the permits. Sincerely, Philip S. Dommer Senior Planner PSD /jh LETTER om rnfl. Do MM Eft AT i iNciq f wvT V Philip S. Dommer Senior Planner City of Edina M4 LuTER To 480,1 West 50th Street �' ®�/1 Edina, MN 55424 ma. Dear Mr. Dommer : July 25, 1989 Thank you for your letter dated July 19, 1989• Also thank you for the meeting at 3:00 p.m. on July 17, the phone conversations on July 17 prior to our meeting, the two phone conversations on the morning of July 20, and the meeting at my home on July 24. I will reiterate for the record what we have discussed. The first is that I wish to follow safety ordinances and have removed the fence boards to form a clear view area. The second is that the current location of the fence as represented by me to be on my property is appropiate and a 4 foot in height fence may be constructed at the current fence posts other then'the fence posts in the clear view area. I have enclosed the two drawings /statements regarding this from July 17 (which you have) and July 24 (as promised). If these are not correct or my statements as above not correct, please let me know. The third is that I based all of my decisions upon information the City of Edina through its employee provided me. I provided you with my April 259 1989 notes regarding this matter as well as the price quotation from my contractor and signed contract. I have also shown you price quotations to correct the fence, one of which you have -from our July 17 meeting which was written at the bottom of the original quotation. This involved removing the fence. The other to replace the 6 foot fence to a 4 foot fence was declined by you on July 24. The fourth is that I have repeatedly stated that the City of Edina is responsible for the information it provided to me as a citizen and is responsible for reimbursing me for changes now being, required as a result of the information provided. I have proposed three options at this point to resolve the matter: removal of the fence with reimbursement, changing the fence to 4 feet with reimbursement, and obtaining a variance to allow a 6 foot fence with the clear view area. You have told me to write Kenneth Rosland about the above matter. You said on July 24 you would send me a variance ap- plication. While you have consistently informed me that it was not up to you to approve variances or approve reimbursement and that your job was to be sure the fence was correct, you said in our first phone conversation on July 20 when I asked,that unless specifically asked for it was typical for information:. requested for building purposes regarding ordinances or concerns to be related orally. In our second conversation the morning of July 20 you stated a variance was "a possibility." In your letter dated July 19 you mention Ordinances1402 and 825.7. You gave me a copy of 1402 on July 17, but I was not provided a copy of 825.7. Please send me a copy of this. I also request any and all procedures I can pursue regarding resolution of this matter so.that I do not forfeit my right to pursue these avenues due to a time limit for action. I have also asked my attorney to write you a letter. For the record, I again wish to resolve this issue as quickly, conveniently, cooperatively, and inexpensively for all parties concerned. I will not, however, be held financially or legally accountable for correcting a product which was conceived based upon information provided to me by the City of Edina when I specifically took actions and inquired for proper information so as to construct the product ac- cording to regulations. Thank you for your continued help in resolving this matter. I look forward to working with you as evidenced by my good faith actions regarding the clear view area. Please note I have written the letter to Mr. Rosland and attached material including this letter. I have sent you a cc. under seperate cover. Sincerely, d 1ohn E. Rala.chnik 14 Morningside Road Edina, MN 55415 925 -4315 (h) 934 -4100 (w) fit- Q6-. / (ITTACMAIWs 9 ti E3 RE"AD # a- it -iq `4 N � � C APPROVAL OF a O )0 1 t s� v tijly, (,dssY !11(VIOW � r y� l.i" : t,4 CV 17 �' '4 "rl 0 (� j't.�l ILC, � ��,✓L�' � c�• .�"'�'��`!1 /- [GG!/i vC� %�C,� i %� � � 1, ice-/ • �'� � �� •i'LLF C% f ,,/1?'_ L,� �,� � .,:�'"b• L J _ _ _ trGL T-jv-e L� f ol L6 C, Ll F,�, �f ' rQ 0 :s p W ax ej c ez ITTAC 4 MW 9 IS AE"Ao 1w vtcl C04, qAj, OjF RNM -7� 1 I eD v4lliuoi ssy It - y 0 rn C 7 IVIV I bi• (OST -M R�jn�o�t - _ Eltr+ 00. Ft&V* (A LSO Ste Atjt�cH nrtt%V T 3 _ *w '0gTA1pJ TOTAL GOZT JOB WORK ORDER TE OF OROER ow N0. PHONE TOMER "S ORDER MECHANIC HELPfEA STARTING GATE ORDER TAKEN BY BILL TO AOOR ❑ DAY WORK _ / _ CITY r ,W=NTRACT ❑EXTRA r JOB NAME AND LOCATIO _ - ! • � J ESCRIPTION OF WORK J - ". _— ------ -' - --- --_ PATE COMPLETED WORK ORDEREO BY I henebv ecknowledge the saudecun co!nPleudn ❑ No one home TOTAL MATEAIA TOTAL LABOR — - - -- -- - -- TAX TOTAL AMOUNT S ❑ Total amount due ❑ Total billing to ; of the above deeonbed work. for above work; or be mailed when – jobfinished -- --- _ - - Signature TOPS gFORM 3468 -- , "- – -- LITHO IN USA - 'Tje- ��— '�–��. 3 � } .`>: �" ".. -'Tf•s j ; �� wU,1'�'.F'7 � �r �4 ~ y •.J� -. r i !M° r •y3 aN vi ..E.� y 1 - �t1. f� __ a�.yM �_y�'w.� -::.�' ��. :tom •ya'GW�^�'.ri .�. • + Y� d+ � 1 T _ '.r,.. �:.'W - X1••1' .�.: i i rier-mcKmWT COST To cl"v6i �iwc� t� F JOB WORK ORDER CATE OF ORDER HELPER STARTING GATE USTOMER•S ORDER NO. PHONE MECHANIC r BILL TO ORDER TAKEN BY ADORE • � � ❑DAY WORK � CONTRACT CIiY +� r J ❑ EXTRA JOB NAME NO LOCATION JOB PHONE • • I hereby acknowledge the esasfectory compleGah — — — — of the above descr+ bed ,,,,a,•r ❑ No one home ❑ Total amount due ❑ Total billing to for above wort: or be mailed when - - -y - -- Signature lob finished. TOPS FORM 3468 LITHO IN USA - " go yy f ',7,, ' t- -r.r.� • m� _ v! f•__" CA r•7 '7i��'yl .T•�h .. i`~� 'Y"- ��`.�f,� ,JYe rr iY�j "l�`tr'4 `+'n� n'�.� t �,� r t �'- " " '!t[ � L +�:1 tt �"t r. r• t `}• w. e t �S 'a.c ° 1 S r f - t,t _. K= ".•'.� +-.� �J �bt ';•` Y•` r li Y. � > S'�t try � �• ��.'- � G -Y ` t °, -�'_. u c., }�- 'r''ij �c 9'�+�`- y��nt,��,.� #yv'�.r�'.t f �t1 r ��z i, f � /_`1t >.•E','�`. .. �. k',f. ��ry^��d �`tWbr��•i�?t'•F�..�-- �'E' 4'• -.. x: "_.! �'.•.s —'� -.r .. � :Y- .: ;3. 139 RPRFT�1-1" PICTURE 3• View from the church we belong to k#.ddle corner from our house at 4201 Morningside looking toward our house and the corner of Morningside and Grimes. My neighbor to the north on Grimes is to the left. This is the third time they have had their house on the market in the last two years. It went on the market July 21 or so. PICTURE 4. View from across the street on Grimes looking toward the corner of Morningside and Grimes and my property. My position is on the property line of 4246 Grimes and 4200 Morningside (this neighbor faces Morningside but has partial yard facing Grimes. _._ � rlemmY?:ti"...C:. _ ^S ^i'ir:%"". "!•.���i�ii .�...'d�b;��� _ - PICTURE 5• View from across the street on Grimes looking at my neighbor's house to the north at 4247 Grimes. The north end of my property and fence is in view. Please note hedges at left side, driveway location. PICTURE 6. View from across the street on Grimes looking toward the corner of Morningside and Grimes. My position is in front of 4246 Grimes, perhaps to the north of absolute front of house nearer to 4244 Grimes. 0 PICTURE ' .. View from behind north portion of the fence. i neighbor to the north at Note overhanging trees onto cutting and which I discuss when I told of project (see of his house is .about where toward camera position. my house which has -the The view is toward Grimes, 4247 Grimes is toward tho right. my property which require ed with neighbor in April note from him). The front the evergreen tree is or slightly ATTACHMEWT 13 (� euRaE�'i (K) VARIANCE- PLAN STATVS AEQU 6sr GAMES Avfi ab I-11- 1- e v r 4 wA , hi oil NItj&s10e ROA® [TG -p�� �l�ItiLE -mmoRIG-RUAL Ph-a"i"OU i GAImEs AVk N 5 k To 6N T4 Ajahq '71 �I � I �, hfo A* , n EN�r Aillij r4o(kf fly" VDC v Fl v s;vP S krN CrAASsy mt1sle l m oAr4lt**S 6Dc- mmcmaoA To SAST 4110 m*AtA- la®t- _ flmdtl( wAu v,v N ko ei (:RtmcS Y�� ro tiallm fougc 1'OsTS SET' WITH WAitON'Ont- fooinE eL)jL:; . NJ AMROS o►v GR��Es AV fc E NNW To NO KTM � lilll111�J11111]U1I /� ■ r- w ■ i ►. r - ■ ■ r ■ wny $V S iGry CsAMSI n4bopw "WO X114" ! ®E RO A I> VAR lAtilf. C 19 5:f3a It: 5% o follptoodt iRa Eq� T � I* ai ORro 1wvsl ®E jig &jZ w il L o.v rnoRNiuc -s�0e _ I ru v I' Ft rium I"av c t- �V�tils A ° r REQUEST FOR PURCHASE a o:; EL.A r;., =ems- `y: TO: City Council Members FROM: John Keprios, Assistant Director VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000, DATE: August 24, 1989 AGENDA ITEM v.A ITEM DESCRIPTION: Reconstruction of Countryside Park Basketball Courts Company Amount of Quote or &d j, Finley Bros. Enterprises _$6,640.00 2. Bury & Carlson, Inc. 2.$7,568.00 3. Midwest Asphalt Corporation 3.$8,850.00 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Finley Bros. Enterprises GENERAL INFORMATION: Reconstruction of Countryside Park Basketball Courts: 84' x 60' as per bid spec ii nature The Recommended bid is within budget not Edina Park and Recreation Wallin, Kenneth Rosland, City Manager Director 1 � e 7, Cn �o • ~�bRPOMI�O • lase REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & Council Members From: Gordon Hughes Date: - September 1, 1989 Subject: WHITE OAKS LOTS 9 & 1 Recommendation: Info /Background: Agenda Item # VT _ A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance 0 Discussion Attached is a letter sent to Andron Development, Inc. on August 30, 1989. This letter has not as yet been responded to. I hope to receive a response for Council briefing on September 5. P CITY OF E D' N A ,i1 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 612 - 927 -8861 August 30, 1989 Richard J. Andron 5808 Garden Avenue Edina, MN 55436 Subject: Lot 9, White Oaks Lot 1, White Oaks Dear Dick: Second Addition Third Addition We appreciated the opportunity to meet with you on August 15, 1989,. concerning the subject lots. As we discussed, we hope we can reach an. amicable solution through the City's purchase of this property. Since our meeting, we have discussed this issue with the City,Council and with members of the White Oaks Association. The City Council has directed that any offer on this project must be conditioned upon City funds being matched on a dollar- for- dollar basis by the Association. I have been advised by the Association that they are able to increase their cash contributions to $16,000. Representatives of the'Association have also advised me that they do not anticipate additional funds forthcoming. Based upon the direction from the City Council, I wish to submit to you a cash offer of $32,000 for the subject lots. This offer would be subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. The City must receive, prior to closing, $16,000 from the White Oaks Improvement Association. 2. The City would accept and acknowledge receipt of a gift of approximately $120,000 in recognition of the market value of the subject lots. We understand that you have evidence supporting the amount of this gift and are therefore in a position to support this valuation. Other terms and conditions concerning the transaction that are of a minor nature, will be contained in the purchase agreement. Dick, we would appreciate your favorable consideration of this offer. We hope you will evaluate this offer recognizing the very costly and difficult improvements that would be necessary to make Lot 9 buildable, even if you were successful in obtaining a building permit. Also, I hope the fact you are a resident and developer of several successful projects in Edina would enter into your consideration or our offer. Richard Andron August 30, 1989 Page two I would appreciate your prompt response to this offer. If possible, I. would like to advise the City Council of the status of this matter at their September 5, meeting. Please advise if you have any questions. Thanks again for your consideration. Sincerely Gordon L. Hughes Assistant City Manager cc: Connor Schmid Donald McMillan Enclosure r A. o e �o r REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland Agenda Item # VI. B From: David A. Velde Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: September 5, 1989 Mgr. Recommends. ❑ To HRA Subject: Grandview Cemetery ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Discussion Recommendation: See Attached Sheet Info /Background: Grandview Cemetery is creating a nuisance for adjacent home owners in the residential district. The operator of the cemetery, Harry Lindberry, has been excavating materials from ,the cemetery property, hauling in fill, operating a commercial trucking firm and handling various materials on the site. In addition, unused or discarded equipment and material have been allowed to accumulate on the property. Staff has met with the neighbors and discussed the actions the City of Edina could take to hopefully resolve the nuisance. The neighbors agree that the operation of a cemetery on the property would be acceptable to them. The trucking enterprise and the excavating operations are not acceptable to the neighbors. The neighbors understand that some earth moving activities will be occurring on the property to grade the remaining property for cemetery use. J The City of Edina can issue orders to Mr. Lindberry to abate the following nuisances: - Tall and noxious weeds - Accumulation of discarded tires - Accumulation of discarded or unused machinery and equipment - Failure to control fugitive dust The City of Edina also, based on the Zoning Ordinance, may be able to stop the excavating operation or at least require such things as fencing and a grading plan, and may be able to stop the truck storage and excavating operations. These actions, if successful, would relieve some of the nuisances which have been occurring on the site, and would stop the commercial trucking enterprise on the site, and the excavating and earth moving which has been occurring. Staff recommends that the following action should be taken to bring about a long term solution to the Grandview Cemetery problem: - Initiate action to attempt to stop the commercial trucking and mining operations on the site - Issue orders to attempt to abate the existing nuisances on the site - At a minimum attempt to require a site grading plan for development of the property for cemetery use and set a date certain for completion of the site grading and finishing REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Rpopul Jam% To Ken Ros 1 and From: Janet Chandler Date: September 5, 1989 Subject: 1989 Recycling Contract with Hennepin County Recommendation: Approval of contract. Agenda Item # v 1 • o • Consent F] Information Only F] Mgr . Recommends [] To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Info /Background: A copy of the 1989 Recycling Agreement between the City of Edina and Hennepin County is attached. This contract is identical to the 1988 Agreement with the exception of the Compensation Section on page 2. The total compensation of $256,643 includes $5 per container(13,600 containers) and 80% of all other program costs, contingent upon recycling a minimum of 2,013 tons of paper, glass and cans. Program results so far indicate that Edina will exceed this goal. This level of funding is consistent with the amount budgeted for the Recycling Program approved by the Council. Upon approval by Council, two contract copies need to be signed by the Mayor and the City Manager. SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT Contract No. A07839 THIS AGREEMENT by and between the COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, STATE OF MINNESOTA, hereinafter called the "County ", through its Bureau of Public Works, A -2400 Government Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487, and the CITY OF EDINA, hereinafter called the "City ", 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the County Board, by Resolution No. , on the th day of , authorized funding for the City of Edina to use for its Recycling Program from January 1, 1989, through December 31, 1989, and WHEREAS, said Recycling Program is consistent with Minnesota Statutes, Section 115A.02 and 115.03, as amended by the Laws of Minnesota 1988, Chapter 685, and Minnesota Statutes 473.801; the Metropolitan,Council's Solid Waste Management Development Guide /Policy Plan; Hennepin County's Solid Waste Master Plan; and Hennepin County's source separation /recycling policies. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED: 1. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED a. The City will operate its (curbside, drop -off, composting) Recycling Program as more fully described in Attachment A incorporated and made part of this Agreement. b. In addition to the services as referred to above, the City agrees to: (1) The City will state that the County is a project co- sponsor in publicity materials and presentations. This statement shall visually and /or verbally be as prominent as the City's name. All promotional materials printed for distribution shall include the statement, "... this program is,80% funded by the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners." In addition, all publicity materials should make use, of the "Hennepin Recycles" logo. (2) The City will furnish the County with a written annual report on calendar year 1989, recycling and composting activities by February 28, 1990, evaluating all aspects of the programs including, but not limited to, information on: - Total costs as compared with the budget; - Publicity strategies used and samples of publicity materials; - Presentations made including dates,-locations, organizations, speakers, and number of people in attendance; - Tonnage of material recovered (both yard wastes and recyclables); - Participation rates; HCA Form No. 110 Rev.8 /88 (Page 1) - Market(s) for collected material, as available; and - Every effort should be made to identify other recycling activities (e.g., volunteer church - sponsored paper drives, retail paper recovery efforts, etc.) and to verify and document their recycles tonnages for 1982 (based year) and for the year of 1989. 2. TERM OF THIS AGREEMENT This Agreement shall commence on January 1, 1989, and terminate on December 31, 1989. 3. COMPENSATION a. In consideration of the services as described above and contained in Attachment A, the County agrees to pay the City a sum not to exceed $256,643.00 for collection services, operating supplies, equipment costs, labor, advertising and administration. b.- The City shall submit invoices semiannually to the County for reimbursement for net costs incurred. c. The County will retain 20 percent of each payment. Funds retained will be disbursed (1) upon receipt and approval of the final written report (2) in accordance with the table below and upon verification of recovered tonnages; and (3) after final termination of net program expenditures. City of Edina Reimbursement Schedule Total Solid Waste Materials % Funding Assistance Year (Tonsl Recovered (Of Net Program Costs) 1989 20,115 0 -1408 Prorated 1409 -1609 50% 1610 -1810 60% 1811 -2012 70% 2013+ 80% d. Payment to the City will be made as provided by law for payments of claims against the County. 4. LIABILITY, INDEMNIFICATION, AND INSURANCES a. The City agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the County, its officers, and employees harmless from any liability, claims, damages, costs, judgements, or expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, resulting directly or indirectly from an act or omission including, without limitation, professional errors or omissions of the City, its agents, officers, employees, or contractors in the performance of the services provided by this Agreement; and against all loss by reason of the failure of the (Page 2) parties to fully perform, in any respect, all obligations under this Agreement. b. The City shall by separate policy or under its self- insurance program maintain and keep in force at all times during the term of this Agreement or any renewal thereof the following insurance coverage: (1) Single limit or combined limit or excess umbrella commercial general liability insurance policy of an amount not less than $600,000 for property damage arising from one occurrence, $600,000 for damages arising from death and /or total bodily injuries arising from one occurrence, and $600,000 for total personal injuries arising from one occurrence. (2) A single limit or combined limit or excess umbrella automobile liability policy, of applicable, covering owned, non - owned, and hired vehicles used regularly in the provision of services under this Agreement in an amount not less than $600,000 per accident for property damage, $200,000 for death and bodily injuries and /or damages of any one person, and $600,000 for total bodily injuries and /or damages arising from any one occurrence. C. Contemporaneously with the execution of this Agreement, the City shall furnish the County with certificates of insurance evidencing the above - required coverage. 5. NON- DISCRIMINATION The City further agrees that,no person shall be excluded from full employment rights or participation in or the benefits of any program, service, or activity connected with this Agreement on the grounds of race, color, creed, religion,. age, sex, disability, marital status, affectional /sexual preference, public assistance status, ex- offender status, or national origin; and no person who is protected by applicable Federal or State laws against discrimination shall be otherwise subjected to discrimination. 6. NON- ASSIGNMENT OF SERVICES The provisions of this Agreement shall not be assigned, sublet, or transferred without the prior written approval of the County. 7. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR It is agreed that nothing herein contained is intended, or should be. construed in any manner as creating or establishing the relationship of co- partners between the parties hereto, or as constituting the City as the - agent, representative, or employee of the County for any purpose in any manner whatsoever. The parties are to be and shall remain independent with respect to all services performed under this Agreement. The City represents that it has, or will secure at its own expenses, all (Page 3) S. 9. personnel required in performing services under this Agreement. Any and all personnel of the City or other persons, while engaged in the performance of any work or services required by the terms of this Agreement, shall have no contractual relationship with the County, and shall not be considered employees of the County, and any and all claims that may or might arise under the Workers' Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said personnel or other persons while so engaged, and any and all claims whatsoever on behalf of any such person or personnel arising out of employment or alleged employment including, without limitation, claims of discrimination against the City, its officers, agents, contractors, or employees, shall in no way be the responsibility of the County; and the City shall defend, indemnify, and hold the County, its officers, agents, and employees harmless from any and all such claims regardless of any determination of any pertinent tribunal, agency, board, commission, or court. Such personnel or other persons shall not require, nbr be entitled to, any compensation, rights, or benefits of any kind whatsoever from the County including, without limitation, tenure rights, medical and hospital care, sick and vacation leave, Workers' Compensation, Unemployment Compensation, disability, severance pay, and PERA. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS The City agrees to compl ordinances pertaining to but not limited to, the Chapter 115A, and 473.01 DATA PRIVACY y with all State statutes, regulations, and .solid waste management and recycling including, applicable provision in Minnesota Statutes, now in force or hereafter enacted. All data collected, created, received, maintained, or disseminated for any purposes by the activities of the City in the performance of the provisions of this contract Is governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, and all other statutory provisions governing data privacy, the Minnesota Rules implementing such Act now in force or hereafter.adopted, as well as Federal regulations on data privacy. 10. MERGER AND MODIFICATION It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement between the parties is contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. All items referred to in this Agreement are incorporated or attached and are deemed to be part of this Agreement. Any material alteration or modification of this Agreement shall only be valid when reduced writing as an Amendment to this Agreement signed by both parties. 11. CANCELLATION This Agreement may be cancelled by either party upon thirty (30) days' written notice. (Page 4) The City, having signed this Agreement, and the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners having duly approved this Agreement on , 19_, and pursuant to such approval and the proper County officials having signed this Agreement, the parties hereto agree to be bound by the provisions herein set forth. Approved as to legality, COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, form, and execution. STATE OF MINNESOTq. Assistant County Attorney Date: By: Chairman of Its County Board Date: And: Associate County Administrator Date: ATTEST: Clerk of the County Board Date: CITY OF By: ' Its Mayor Date: ATTEST: Title: (Page 5) 1989 HENNEPIN COUNTY GRANT APPLICATION MUNICIPAL SOURCE - SEPARATED RECYCLABLES AND YARDWASTE PROGRAMS 1. DESCRIPTION OF MUNICIPAL RECYCLING PROGRAM. The city of Edina located at 4801 West 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 927 -8861 STREET ADDRESS TELEPHONE , will implement a source separation program for recyclables and yardwaste during the period January 1 , 1989 to December 31 , 1989 A copy of the resolution passed by the City Council proposing the program described below is attached. The City of Edina continued it's previous Recycling Program through the first six months of 1989. This program provided monthly recycling pickup for half of Edina's single family homes and maintained the Edina Recycling Center six days a week. Recycling route pickup,as well as maintenance of the recycling center and marketing of materials, was operated as a city project. Newspaper, glass and cans were collected on the route pickup. In addition to these ....-items, used oil and household items are collected at the Recycling Center. The City of Edina has contracted with BFI, INc. for weekly pickup of recyclables city -wide starting July 1, 1989, at a cost of $2.45 per household. Single family and duplex homes will be served. Edina's residential garbage haulers are required, as a condition of licensing, to make separate pickup of yard waste for composting throughout the season. If there is additional cost to the hauler, this cost is included in the garbage fee. The City is not reimbursing the haulers for this service. Office paper, newspaper and pop cans are recycled at Edina City Hall and the Community Center. On June 5, 1989, Edina City Council passed a Mandatory Separation of Recyclables Ordinance (enclosed). This ordinance mandates source separation in all City owned buildings schools as well as single family and duplex residences. Projections are that 2,280 tons of paper, glass, and cans will be recycled in 1989, for an 11% abatement of the waste stream. An additional 3,000 tons of yard waste, 250 tons of household goods and 95 tons of used oil bring the projected total to 5,625 tons, a 28% abatement of the residential waste stream. A single container for each household has been ordered from Buckhorn - for distribution during the last two weeks of July, at a cost of $5.85 per container. The City of Edina requests reimbursement from Hennepin County in the amount of $255,448. . PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 2. PROMOTIONAL AND EDUCATION ACTIVITIES ( "X" as appropriate) NO.OFHSHLDS YES ANNUALHSHLDCOST ® © ❑ COLLECTED ❑GLASS ❑ UIHEH ❑ HANGERS, ETC. ❑ VIDEOS N WSLETTER NEEWSPAPER BILILI SERT PRZESRAWING '—� 3. RECYCLING AND YARDWASTE ACTIVITIES DAYS 3C. SEPARATE YARDWASTE COLLECTION 3a. CURB OR ALLEY COLLECTION OF RECYCLABLES LOCATION COLLECTIONTIMES ® SPRING ® SUMMER ® FALL COLLECTION COMPANY Jan . -Jun : -C I ty of Edina ANNU LCONTRACT MOS ANNUA HSHLD COST NO.OFHSHLDS 113,361 NO. OF BUSINESSES ON RESIDENTIAL ROUTE -i,.l --Dec---BFl OIL . is 196, 4r) 4+ $ 140 MOS • 3d. REFUSE COLLECTION COLL. FREQUEN Y monthly �cit ONT /HSHLD 1 SAME DAY COLLECTION SAME ® ' YES' NO -same o day for 70% of residents household AND RECYCLABLES Mon -Sat (BEI garbage customers) 3b. APARTMENT RECYCLING PROGRAM X X NO. OF MULTI FAMILY NO.OFHSHLDS YES ANNUALHSHLDCOST MATERIALS ❑ COLLECTED ❑GLASS ❑ UIHEH ❑ BUILDINGS SERVED 0 $ PAR CANSL DAYS 3C. SEPARATE YARDWASTE COLLECTION MATERIALS COLLECTED LOCATION COLLECTIONTIMES ® SPRING ® SUMMER ® FALL TO NO.WEEKSANN. COLL.WITHTRASH ® YES ❑ NO haulers ANN. HSHLD COST user fee. GLASS PLASTIC OIL nt i re seaso required t fn y 3d. REFUSE COLLECTION DOES CITY CONTRACT FOR YES ©NO ANNUAL HSHLD COST $ REFUSE COLLECTION? 3e. DROP -OFF CENTERS DAYS HOURS MATERIALS COLLECTED LOCATION FROM TO APER BOARD METALS GLASS PLASTIC OIL OTHER household len Ave., 1 block W of #100 Mon -Sat 9AM 4 PM X X X X items 4. RECYCLING AND YARDWASTE TONNAGES 7. EXPENSES NEWSPRINT 1 620 USED OIL (285.7 gal = 1 ton) 5 LABOR — HOURLY WAGES $ 50 000 CARDBOARD BATTERIES LABOR — SALARIES $ 30 GLASS TIRES LABOR — CONSULTANT FEES $ 450 -- 10,000 METAL CANS TEXTILEES & EQUIPMENT — PURCHASE/LEASE $ 180 house hold goods VEHICLES/TRAILERS 6,000 PLASTIC -- SUBTOTAL B 345 EQUIPMENT — PURCHASE/LEASE $ SUBTOTAL C DEVELOPMENT COSTS (maintenance $ SUBTOTAL A 2 280 (YARDWASTE) 3, 000 OF RECYCLING CENTER supplies) 2,400 Total 5,625 tons o 28i PROMOTIONAL ACTIVITIES $ % OF RESIDENTIAL WASTE STREAM RECYCLED 5,000 5. REVENUES CASH PRIZE DRAWINGS $ SALE OF RECYCLABLES $ 34,000 CONTRACT PAYMENTS FOR COLLECTION/ TRANSPORTATION OF RECYCLABLES $ 1960404 OTHER $ CONTRACT PAYMENTS FOR COLLECTION/ $ TRANSPORTATION OF YARDWASTE � - -- TOTAL REVENUE $ 34,000 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 269,804 6. RECYCLING CONTAINERS CONTAINERS 13 600 TOTALCOST $ 79 560 NET EXPENSES $ 235,804 PURCHASED > > NO. HSHLDS 13, 361 CITY SHARE $ 12, 755 CITY SHARE 20 % $ 47,161 CONTAINERS COST PER CONTAINER $._8 COUNTY SHARE $ 66,805 COUNTY SHARE $0 % $ 188,643 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE (Mayor /City Manager) DATE TOTAL CITY EXPENDITURES $ (Program + Container Expenses) 59,916 SIGNATURE (RECYCLING COORDINATOR) DATE TOTAL COUNTY REIMBURSEMENT TO CITY $ (Program + Container Reimbursement) 255,448 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER A. o • �NCIDAPON`��0 • 1888 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # VI.E- From: Francis J. Hoffman Consent ❑ City Engineer Information Only ❑ Date: 5 September, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Storm Sewer [K] To Council Modifications 0 Action Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Approve four Storm Sewer Projects: and authorize bids to be taken. STS -195, STS -196, STS -199 & STS -200 Info /Background: Staff has reviewed all areas of Edina and the following projects have been determined to need additional stormwater drainage upgrading: Estimated Cost A. STS -195: Woodcrest Drive - from 56th & Woodcrest $ 9,348.00 to Back Yard of 5528 Woodcrest B. STS -196: Grove Street - from Easement West Side of $ 27,656.00 5717 Grove Street to 145' East C. STS -199: 76th & Parklawn Avenue - West to the Pond $ 5,375.00 D. STS -200: South of West 58th Street - at Grimes & $ 54,784.00 Halifax Area Staff has evaluated each area and will present to Council the recommended alternative for construction. The funds for the projects will be from the stormwater utility fund. A. o e' v V • �N�bnron/`t °� 1888 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER Agenda Item # VI.F From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Consent Information Only ❑ Date: AUGUST 31, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: HEARING DATE FOR 7 To Council 4N -SALE WINE LICENSE FEES Action Fx1 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: That a hearing date of 10/2/89 be set to consider an increase in on -sale wine license fees. Info /Background: During. the 1989 Session.the Legislature adopted Chapter 104 (H.F. 1405) which states that no city shall increase the fee for a'liquor license except after notice and hearing on the proposed increase. This includes on -sale wine licenses.as referenced in M.S..340A.408, subd. 2. (See attachment.) Staff.-is proposing an increase in the on -sale wine license fees (first increase since 1985) to capture increased staff..costs. In order to comply with the new legislation I would recommend setting a hearing date of 10/2/89 for Council's consideration of the proposed license fees. Affected licensees are being noticed as required. aP e. o 10 Ch. 103 LAWS of MINNESOTA for 1989 228 ecoDOmic and a 'cu tur 1 re our es Qf the county, The !i iU ion on aDp e t -I _iA this s�rction roh'bit ccumu ati of a ounts i� a of S QO inn a un to �e u fir le- u ses _ � se do . De a� acxumulatediti time f� us no ex eed S 0 . Sec. 2. LOCAL APPROVAL. Section 1 ta_ kes e. ffect th dal, ft h ms ed un bar corn lies with inn sot S ute se lion 64-5.021 subdue ivts�t 3 Presented to the governor May S, 1989 Signed by the governor May 9, 1989, 6:01 P.M. C4APM 104°- H.F.Na. 1409 An act relating to "quo?,• requiring notice and hearing before liquor llcenv fees are increased, amending Mfnnesota Statutes 1988, se dom 340A.408, by adding a subdlvision BE IT ENACTED By THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: addinSection I. Minnesota Statutes 1988, section 340A.408, is amended by g a subdivision to 'read: Su d• ;e FEE INCREASES; NOTICE, HEAMG. Rio pity town. or . egunty shall Acrease ILee fee for a g ; li its Quern d Or 3. exc After n�� eari 92 ro sue, d— a ¢y s divisi s Ia 2, e ro ose d in rea ee m_ast �e mane Rio No i .2 th thg da a se for the ea ' — =ed l cen ees ptt 1r least � before a i law or ch rter. �' S° di 'si su erg de =in nsi ten Sec. 2. >EFFIECIIVE DATE. Se ion 1 31i a ective Jane J(.) g + d �� 12 all liW&M t d or ewe oar or after the Al le Presented to the governor May S, I989 0 . Signed by the governor May 9, 1989, 6 :18 p,ru. New la 044 Is indicated by ade in , doletlons by cw2jaM, m� a. ,ti Agenda Item VII.A Glenn G. C. Olson Appointment to the Metropolitan Transit Commission Home Address: 21690 Fairview St. Greenwood, Minn. 55331 (612) 474 -6838 Business Address: NSP - 414 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, Minn. 55401 (612) 330 -5975 General Oualifications Demonstrated ability to work in a public affairs environment. Extensive experience as a member of public bodies. Presently serves as Vice.Chair of the Metropolitan Transit Commission and Chairman of Finance and Administration Committee. Major Activities Worked with MTC staff to update the criteria for implementing new services and evaluating the cost effectiveness of existing routes. - Supervised the first competitive bidding of bus service by MTC. This permits MTC to continue in service routes that would exceed subsidy per passenger standards and. insures_ that bid service is coordinated with other MTC routes. - Worked to relieve overloads on MTC peak hour buses that serve suburban areas. MTC ridership grew in 1988 after years of stability or decline. - Accomplished implementation of a fare restructuring program. •Worked on replacement of MTC fleet. Average fleet age has dropped to seven years by purchasing about 125 new buses yearly. Record of Public Service Currently serving on the Metropolitan Transit Commission. Appointed in 1986 to represent suburban communities. Appointed Chairman of'MTC's Advisory Committee of Transit, 1976. Served for 10 years. - Appointed to MTC to represent Minneapolis, 1972 -74. Greenwood City Council, 1977. - Minnetonka School Board, 1977 -82. Chairman, 1979 -82. -Metropolitan Council, 1967 -71. ' - Minneapolis City Council Member, 1963 -67. President, 1965 -67. Professional Mist= Administrator for Northern States Power Company; since 1980, Metropolitan Governmental Affairs. w 4630 Drexel Avenue Edina, MN 55424 August 23, 1989 Mayor Frederick S. Richards City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Richards: This is to ask the Edina City Council to authorize a plan to replace the missing boulevard trees in the old country club district during the summer of 1990. The purpose of this is to maintain the property values and, not so incidentally, to prevent a deterioration of the cities tax base. There currently is a need to add 289 trees to bring the old country club district back to its original condition. (Please see the attached list of missing boulevard trees established by visual inspection.) The city forester, Mr. Horbath, estimates the cost to plant trees under contract to be $100 per tree, or approximately $29,000. The current annual budget for tree replacement in all of Edina is $5,000, according to Mr. Roseland. He points out that the amount of income from state tax revenues for this and other purposes does not permit a larger budget and more aggressive tree replacement programs like, for example, St. Louis Park. Therefore, other ways to fund tree replacement clearly need to be found. One alternative source of financing to consider is a special assessment, as has been done, for example, to repair sidewalks. The $29,000 tree replacement cost is only .02% of the $150,000,000 market valuation of the property in the old country club district. It is only .1% of the approximate net taxes paid esti- mated by Ms. Diane Kool to be $3,069,478. It is only $50 for each of the 564 homes in the area. Stretching the special assessment over three years should be a politically acceptable way to finance the tree replacement. With special session property tax reform expected to reduce property taxes for Edina's homes and expand city taxing authority, 1990 is a good year to implement a special assessment. A number of homeowners, such as myself, may have planted boulevard trees at our own expense. However, it is in the interest of all homeowners to support an effective boulevard tree replacement program. While homes in the district currently are selling well, we can not assume they will continue to do so as the district becomes more blighted with tree loss. This is especially so in the coming years as the number of buyers declines because of demographics. We need to be competitive with other suburbs, as the City Council has recognized, for example, when it authorized the renovation of the 50th and France area. The Apr a Mayor Frederick S. Richards Page Two August 18, 1989 country club district, as a gateway to our city, is especially important to maintain. Even starting now is late, given the time it takes new plantings to mature. When I drove my family into the district, for the first time, in our move from the east, my young son said, "We're here." He knew it from my pictures he'd seen showing the lovely tree - shaded streets. I hope the City Council and admin- istration will find an effective way to permit future generations to say the same. Sincerely, right M. Dornblaser 4630 Drexel Avenue cc: City Council Members Kenneth E. Rosland CITY OF EDINA OLD COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT MISSING BOULEVARD TREES No 10 Edgebrook Br- Deadend Bruce 10 4500 6 4600 5 4900 Arden 12 4500 19 4600 4900 * blocks No No No Bridge Country Club 16 Sunnyside 2 5 2 3 3 3 4 4 3 1 3 6 2 6 2 4 2 3 2 3 5 10 4 23 17 42 Total Missing 286 Edina Blvd Br- M'land 4500 5 M'land -E Blvd Browndale. E Blvd - W'dale 4400 3 W'dale- Drexel 6 4400* Drexel - Caseo 9 4500 Casco -Bruce 18 4600 Bruce -Arden 4600 Townes Rd -Curve St 19 4500 Curve St- France Av 4600 Moorland Grimes -45th St 6 4500 5 4600 Bruce 10 4500 6 4600 5 4900 Arden 12 4500 19 4600 4900 * blocks No No No Bridge Country Club 16 Sunnyside 2 5 2 3 3 3 4 4 3 1 3 6 2 6 2 4 2 3 2 3 5 10 4 23 17 42 Total Missing 286 Edina Blvd 6 4500 5 4600 Woodale 2 4400 3 4500 8 4600 3 C.Club -50th Drexel 12 4500 10 4600 Casco 19 4500 28 4600 Bruce 10 4500 6 4600 5 4900 Arden 12 4500 19 4600 4900 * blocks No No No Bridge Country Club 16 Sunnyside 2 5 2 3 3 3 4 4 3 1 3 6 2 6 2 4 2 3 2 3 5 10 4 23 17 42 Total Missing 286 HAPY E. � U! , T OF FFG,t' ^E 1 Aug. 25, 1989 i vJ�J� Mr. Robert Kojetin Director of Parks & Recreation k 4801 West 50th St. Edina, Mn. 55424 Dear Mr. Kojetin, s. I recently talked to Mr. Valerie about the possibility a of putting a Satelite on the Executive Course, and he said you were opposed to it. Last week I played with two women, one had recently had a baby, and the other was about my age. None of us dared drink anything because of the fear of not making it back - granted you have trees, but you also have poison ivy!!!! I hear all sorts of comments in the club house like "I don't dare drink coffee - it goes right through me" etc. etc. If I don't have my coffee, I can barely be sociable in the morning, a_ much less address a golf ball. 4 Please have pity on the bladders of women our age. After all, we are the ones who have given you the young golfers! Your course attracts many Senior people, and both men and women have problems along this line. E Thank you for your consideration. F Sincerely, i Mary Givens, Treasurer, Golden Girls copy /John Valerie ST CON ^^ Fred Richards, 'Mayor_-___._�� '4 , e Cn J \� ~�bHPOMS£O� ISO REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor and Council From: John Wallin Finance Direct r Date: September 5, 1989 Subject: Executive Summary Income & Expense Report Recommendation: Executive Summary format. Agenda Item # x.A Consent ❑ Information Only 0 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA F] To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Info /Background: As per your request, .enclosed . are Executive Summary Income and Expense Reports for the Enterprise funds through July 1989, with comparable numbers for the same period of 1988. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INCOME AND EXPENSE REPORT YEAR TO DATE - JULY INCREASE 1989 1988 (DECREASE) ART CENTER REVENUES EXPENDITURES INCOME BEFORE DEPRECIATION DEPRECIATION EXPENSE NET INCOME (LOSS) 110• REVENUES EXPENDITURES INCOME BEFORE DEPRECIATION DEPRECIATION EXPENSE NET INCOME $124,035 $108,279 $15,756 114,583 105,338 9,245 9,452 2,941 6,511 8,137 8,449 (312) $1,315 ($5,508) $6,823 =----- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- ------------ ------ - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- $100,526 $103,235 ($2,709) 52,508 56,135 (3,627) 48,018 47,100 918 9,265 9,835 (570) $38,753 ------ - - - - -- ------------ $37,265 ------ - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- $1,488 ----- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- GOLF COURSE REVENUES $1,051,551 $887,741 $163,810 EXPENDITURES 568,744 455,953 112,791 INCOME BEFORE DEPRECIATION 482,807 431,788 51,019 DEPRECIATION EXPENSE 61,005 61,075 (70) INCOME BEFORE BOND PAYMENTS 421,802 370,713 51,089 BOND PAYMENTS 184,000 83,000 101,000 NET INCOME $237,802 ------------ $287,713 ------ - - - - -- ($49,911) ----- - - - - -- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INCOME AND EXPENSE REPORT YEAR TO DATE - JULY REVENUES EXPENDITURES INCOME BEFORE DEPRECIATION DEPRECIATION EXPENSE INCOME BEFORE BOND PAYMENTS BOND PAYMENTS NET LOSS REVENUES EXPENDITURES INCOME BEFORE DEPRECIATION DEPRECIATION EXPENSE INCREASE 1989 1988 (DECREASE) ARENA $300,959 $224,489 $76,470 256,605 218,569 38,036 GUN RANGE NET INCOME (LOSS) 44,354 44,860 (506) 83,000 ($83,506) 5,920 27,160 (21, 240) 0 ($21,240) 38,434 17,700 20,734 83,000 ($62,266) $25,548 $15,649 $9,899 14,333 14,878 (545) 11,215 3,020 $8,195 EDINBOROUGH PARR REVENUES EXPENDITURES LOSS BEFORE DEPRECIATION DEPRECIATION EXPENSE $352,089 353,091 (1,002) 12.670 771 3,080 ($2,309) $206,096 356,549 (150,453) 7.420 NET LOSS ($13,672) ($157,873) 10,444 (60) $10,504 $145,993 (3,458) 149,451 5,250 $144,201 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INCOME AND EXPENSE REPORT YEAR TO DATE - JULY INCREASE 1989 1988 (DECREASE) LIQUOR STORES REVENUES $2,817,428 $2,881,100 ($63,672) EXPENDITURES 2,454,666 2,623,854 (169,188) INCOME BEFORE DEPRECIATION 362,762 257,246 105,516 DEPRECIATION EXPENSE 24,290 23,906 384 NET INCOME $338,472 ------ - - - - -- ------------ $233,340 ------ - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- $105,132 ----- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- Cn •, ~CORPOW's • iBeB REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & Council From: John Wallin(�,��o� Finance Director Date: September 5, 1989 Subject: Set Hearing Date on 199 Budget and Taxes Payable in 1990 Agenda Item # X.B Consent 0 Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Set hearing date on the 1990 Budget and taxes payable in 1990 for October 2, 1989 and if necessary, reconvening the '.' budget hearing on October 16, 1989 Info /Background: Attached is an example of the budget hearing notice the Department of Revenue is recommending to fulfill the truth in taxation requirements. This hearing notice will appear as a one - quarter page 'ad in the Minneapolis Tribune-in mid - September. c� �n ��IB68i 9'a STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE August 25, 1989 To: Mayors, City Managers and City Clerks of all Minnesota Cities Chairs of County Boards and County Auditors of all Minnesota Counties Board Members and Superintendents of all Minnesota School Districts Enclosed is an example of the type of budget hearing notice the Department of Revenue is asking all local governments to publish to fulfill the truth in taxation requirements pre - scribed by the Department for taxes payable in 1990. The notice should be printed using the same amount of space -- one - quarter page — the same arrangement of type and the same type sizes shown in the example. To ensure that all citizens throughout the state receive the same type of notice, we are ask- ing all local governments to use the language shown in the example -- modified, of course, with appropriate local names, dates and locations. In addition, the use of uniform language throughout the state will aid the Department in judging the effectiveness of the notice. The organization of the notice is calculated to bring attention to the issue of greatest impor- tance to property owners -- whether or not there will be an increase or decrease in the amount of property tax to be collected. The language is aimed at a general audience -- one not familiar with property tax terms used by government officials. The tone is intended to be informal and friendly, and to communicate that you genuinely want the public to attend the hearing. You will notice that the second to the last sentence of the notice sets a date, hour and place for reconvening the budget hearing if discussion on the budget cannot be completed at the initial meeting and it must be recessed. Thus, in addition to selecting the date, hour and place for your budget hearing, it will also it will necessary for you to select a date, hour and place for reconvening the budget hearing, even though you do not expect it to be necessary to reconvene the hearing. This example fulfills all the requirements of the truth in taxation instructions which the Department has mailed to you. If you have any questions about what you are required to do, please don't hesitate to call the Department's Local Government Services Division at 612- 296 -0336. 4 ohce &eFs n Commissioner Enclosure AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER i ff d Notice to cig Pine C d tiwu. Proposed increase in property taxes for 1990 The Pine County Board of Commissioners is proposing to increase total property taxes to be collected for 1990 by x percent over 1989 taxes. Total amount proposed: $00,000,000. This increase is a proposal only. All citizens of Pine County are invited to attend a public hearing where the Board of Commissioners will discuss the proposed increase. The board will vote to approve or disapprove this amount at the hearing. Please come and give the members of the board your opinions on this proposal. Public hearing Date: I October 10, 1989 Hour: 7 p.m. Place: Room 5 Pine County Courthouse 123 Pine Street Pineville, Minnesota If additional time is needed, the hearing ziuill be reconvened on October 12 at 7 p.m. in the same place. Summaries of the county's proposed 1990 budget are available for review in the Pine County Auditor's office, county courthouse, room 123. Persons unable to attend this hearing may send written comments to the board at the above address. For more information, call the Pine County Auditor's office: 123 - 1234, 8 -4:30, M -F. A. cn lees To: Mayor & Council REPORT /RECOMMENDATION From: John Wallin Finance Dir ctor Date: September 5, 1989 Subject: Set hearing date on advance refunding of 1985 Tax Increment Bonds Recommendation: Agenda Item # x&__ Consent Ej] Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Action 7 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Set hearing date on advance refunding of 1985 Tax Increment Bonds for October 2, 1989 Info /Background: In September, 1985 the City issued $12,000,000 of General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds.to finance -'a portion of the HRA's costs relating to the Edinborough project. The Bonds mature from 1989 through 2006 and bear interest at rates ranging from 6.5% for Bonds maturing in 1989 to 9.0% for bonds maturing in 2006. The net interest rate on the Bonds is approx- imately 8.9 %. The Bonds maturing in 1997 and thereafter ($9,700,000 of the principal amount of the Bonds) are callable for redemption at the option of the City on January 1, 1996. With lower interest rates, the City could issue a series of advance refunding bonds to refund all or a portion of the!:Bonds and would be able to realize substantial debt service savings. In an advance refunding, the refunded, or prior bonds are replaced with the refunding bonds. The prior bonds are "defeased" with the proceeds of the Refunding Bonds which are deposited in an escrow account and invested in federal securities. The escrow is structured so that all of the principal of and interest due on the Prior Bonds until maturity or the call date is paid from the amounts deposited,l.in the escrow account and the investment income thereon. Advance refundings differ from a typical refinancing since the Prior Bonds remain outstanding and are not paid upon the issueance of the Refunding Bonds. This technique allows an issuer to lock in today's rates at a time that the Prior Bonds are not prepayable. In an advance refunding of the City's 1985 Tax Increment Bonds the City would redeem all of the Bonds maturing on or after January 1, 1997 on January 1, 1996. This redemption provision was clearly stated in the form of the Bonds, the Notice of Bond Sale and the Official Statement prepared by the City for distribution to potential purchasers of the Bonds. This redemption provision was taken into account by the purchaser in determing what to bid for the Bonds. The City should not be subject to criticism by holders of the 1985 Tax Increment Bonds whose Bonds are redeemed prior to their maturity date. The benefit to the City of an advance refunding of the 1985 Tax Increment Bonds is debt service savings. The advance refunding will also lessen the risk that the tax increments from the District will not be sufficient to pay the general obligation bonds of the City which are payable from the tax increments and that the City would be required to levy taxes to pay this shortfall. Federal law requires that the City hold a public hearing on the issuance of the Refunding Bonds within one year prior to the date of issuance of the Refunding Bonds. At this point interest rates have fallen far enough to produce the targeted $400,000 of present value savings that the Council determined last year to be the minimum savings that would make a refunding feasible. With the Council's approval after the public hearing, I would then come back to the Council for approval for the sale of the Refunding Bonds. s . `i WE 09 -05 -89 PAGE 1 ACCOUNT NO-. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4262 - 646 -64 204953 8846 10- 4262 - 646 -64 204953 8846 10- 4262 - 646 -64 204953 8846 27- 4248 - 669 -66 11- 4201 - 127 -12 10- 4202 - 600 -60 10- 4226 - 507 -50 1081 10- 4226 - 507 -50 1087 10- 3180 - 000 -00 50- 4248 - 841 -84 3142 40- 4248 - 803 -80 9235 2948 41- 4248 - 902 -90 9255 3279 10- 4202 - 440 -44 12- 4215 - 434 -43 30409 30- 3505- 000 -00 23- 1300- 001 -00 10- 4157 - 510 -51, 10- 4288 - 510 -51 20365 9420 10- 4504 - 490 -49 10- 4902 - 490 -49 20365 9420 40- 3800 - 000 -00 40- 4504 - 802 -80 3003 2888 40- 4540 - 801 -80 3024 3126 * * * -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 247R21 08/23/89 93.95 RED WING SHOES SHOES 247R21 08/23/89 93.95 RED WING SHOES HSOES 247R21 08/23/89 93.95- RED WING SHOES HSOES 93.95 248703 08/23/89 70.00 CHRIS CREW CONSTR REPAIRS 70.00 248704 08/23/89 485.00 ZAHNER CONSTR CONSTRUCTION 485.00 * 248705 08/23/89 464.63 JOHN L THAYER REFUND 464.63 * 248706 08/23/89 187.50 BFT RECYCL SYST SERVICES 248706 08/23/89 32,734.45 BFT RECYCL SYST RECYCL CONTRC 32,921.95 *. 248707 08/23/89 245.00 BEULAH MELOY AMBULANCE REFUND 245.00 * 248708 08/23/89 27.20 BLOOM LINO /CARPT MAINT 27.20 * 248709 08/23/89 245.00 STERLING FENCE REPAIR FENCE 248709 08/29/89 982.88 STERLING FENCE FENCE REPAIR 1,227.88 * 248710 08/23/89 45.00 ST CLOUD SEMINAR 45.00 * 248711 08/23/89 187.50 MILLS ADVERTISING CABLE 187.50 * .248712 08/23/89 225.00 FRANK MUSIL PAYMENT . 225.00 * 248713 08/23/89 7,500.00 A DICKEY ARCH INC AC ADDITION 7,500.00 * 248714 08/23/89 3,465.00 LIFE INS CO INSURANCE 3,465.00 * 248715 08/23/89 250.00 SEXTON /CIS INC SERV CONTRACT 248715 08/23/89 _ 46.25 SEXTON /CIS INC -CARBONLESS PAPER 248715 08/23/89 350.00 SEXTON /CIS INC EQUIP 646.25 248716 08/23/89 5.26 RON OLSONOWSKI REFUND WATER BILL 5.26 248717 08/28/89 228.97 ECOMARS INC IND ODOR CONTROL 248717 08/23/89 165.83 ECOMARS INC X -0 CONTROL %✓ WE 09 -05 -89 PAGE 1 ACCOUNT NO-. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4262 - 646 -64 204953 8846 10- 4262 - 646 -64 204953 8846 10- 4262 - 646 -64 204953 8846 27- 4248 - 669 -66 11- 4201 - 127 -12 10- 4202 - 600 -60 10- 4226 - 507 -50 1081 10- 4226 - 507 -50 1087 10- 3180 - 000 -00 50- 4248 - 841 -84 3142 40- 4248 - 803 -80 9235 2948 41- 4248 - 902 -90 9255 3279 10- 4202 - 440 -44 12- 4215 - 434 -43 30409 30- 3505- 000 -00 23- 1300- 001 -00 10- 4157 - 510 -51, 10- 4288 - 510 -51 20365 9420 10- 4504 - 490 -49 10- 4902 - 490 -49 20365 9420 40- 3800 - 000 -00 40- 4504 - 802 -80 3003 2888 40- 4540 - 801 -80 3024 3126 * * * -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 09 -05 -39 PAGE 2 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 394.80 * 248718 08/23/89 245.00 WM G BROSE AMBULANCE REFUND 10 -3180- 000 -00 245.00 * I 248719 08/28/89 52.9.5 DONS APPLIANCE /TV SERV CALL 10- 4248 - 440 -44 5516 3229 248719 08/23/89 746.0,0 DONS APPLIANCE /TV DISHWASHER 10- 4901 - 440 -44 L5500 2520 798.9'5 * 248720 08/23/89 760.0 COMPRESSED AIR MAINT AGREEM 10- 4274 - 440 -44 25169 2514 248720 08/28/89 1,292.Q0 ,0 COMPRESSED AIR AIR LAB 10- 4902 - 440 -44 25311 1772 2,052.00 * 248721 08/28/89 327.3.0 MIDWEST LANDSCAPING PLANTS /SHRUBS 10- 4560 - 644 -64 16541 3030 248721 08/23/89 971.6,0 MIDWEST LANDSCAPING LANDSCAPING 10 -4560- 644 -64 15891 3139 t' 1,298.9'0 * ADVERTISING r^ p A 5 V 4214 0 "4Z� -4 - -.- 3 -2-7- 248723 08/23/89 560.00 TREE TRIMMERS _INC REMOVE /GRIND STUMP 10- 4248 - 644 -64 2931 560.00 * 248724 08/23/89 14.0,0 CHERI ITNYRE REFUND 10- 1145 - 000 -00 14.00 * 248725 08/23/89 14.0,0 JAMES F HERD REFUND 10- 1145 - 000 -00 14.00 * 248726 08/23/89 7.2 1,0 JENNIFER NELSON MILEAGE 10- 4504 - 623 -62 7.20 " 248727 08/23/89 16.0.8 TOM MATSON MILEAGE 10- 4504 - 623 -62 16.08 248728 08/23/89 70.0 .0 SALLY BONKRUDE SERV 30 -4224- 781 -78 70.00 * 248729 08/23/89 50.00 BLOOMINGTON SERV 30 14224- 781 -78 50.00 * 248730 08/23/89 75.00 DAVID SCHUT SERV 30- 4224 - 781 -78 75.00 * 248731 08/23/89 40.0,0 LINDEN HILLS SERV 30- 4224 - 781 -78 40.00 * 248732. 08/23/89 75.0 ,0 TRIAD SERV 30- 4224 - 781 -78 75.00 248733 08/23/89 30.0,0 INVER HILLS BAND SERV 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30.00 248734 08/23/89 75.00 ROBERT BURTIS SERV 30- 4224 - 781 -78 75.00 r i 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 248735 08/23/89 248736 08/23/89 248737 08/23/89 248738 08/23/89 248739 08/23/89 248739 08/23/89 248739 08/23/89 248740 08/23/89 248740 08/23/89 248740 08/23/89 248741 08/23/89 * * * * ** 248743 08/23/89 248744 08/23/89 248745 08/23/89 248746 08/23/89 248747 08/23/89 248748 .08/23/89 248749 08/28/89 248750 08/28/89 248751 08/28/89 248752 08/28/89 09 -05 -89 PAGE 3 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 50- 4214 - 822 -82 50- 4214 - 842 -84 50- 4214 - 862 -86 50- 4214 - 822 -82 50- 4214 - 842 -84 50- 4214 - 862 -86 40- 3357 - 000 -00 30- 4201 - 781 -78 240 3312 27- 4504 - 664 -66 0531 3305 30- 4504 - 782 -78 1276 3314 30- 4201 - 781 -78 10- 3180 - 000 -00 10- 3500 - 000 -00 10- 3500 - 000 -00 10- 4248 - 440 -44 02322 2521 10- 4604 - 646 -64 950254 3180 29- 4204 - 721 -72 3333 * * * -CKS �f CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 50.00 KIM BLOOM SERV 50.00 150.00 DAVID CICCHESE SERV 150.00 50.00 BOB WALSER SERV 50.00 265.00 MARK LARSON SERV 265.00 14.16 GRAND OF MN ADVERTISING 14.16 GRAND OF MN ADVERTISING 14.18 GRAND OF MN ADVERTISING 42.50 * 22.50 MN JAYCEES ADVERTISING 22.50 MN JAYCEES ADVERTISING 22.50 MN JAYCEES ADVERTISING 67.50 * 2,994.53 FILM TEC CORP REFUND 2,994.53 * 292.80 CITYLINE PRO SERV 292.80 150.00 JIM WALLACE NEW TEE SIGN 150.00 90.00 COSINES GENERAL SUPPLIES 90.00 * 96.00 ROXANNE SEIDEL PRO SERV 96.00 * 30.00 JULIE R WELCH AMBULANCE REFUND 30.00 * 17.00 PHYLLIS ANDERSON REFUND 17.00 * 7.00 JUDITH.ST.ITT REFUND 7.00 * 32.50 GREENWOOD GRAP ART TYPESETTING 32.50 * 201.30 MENARDS WOOD 201.30 * 15.00 NATL RIFLE ASSN DUES 09 -05 -89 PAGE 3 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 50- 4214 - 822 -82 50- 4214 - 842 -84 50- 4214 - 862 -86 50- 4214 - 822 -82 50- 4214 - 842 -84 50- 4214 - 862 -86 40- 3357 - 000 -00 30- 4201 - 781 -78 240 3312 27- 4504 - 664 -66 0531 3305 30- 4504 - 782 -78 1276 3314 30- 4201 - 781 -78 10- 3180 - 000 -00 10- 3500 - 000 -00 10- 3500 - 000 -00 10- 4248 - 440 -44 02322 2521 10- 4604 - 646 -64 950254 3180 29- 4204 - 721 -72 3333 * * * -CKS �f �� CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 1989 CITY OF.EDINA WINDTALES BANNERS CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT REIMBURSEMENT US WEST COMM PHONE 15.00 TELEPHONBE 248753 08/28/89 1,290.010 GENERAL SUPPLIES FINLEY BROS ENTER CONSTRUCTION 1,290.00 * 248754 08/28/89 300.010 300.00 * 248755 08/28/89 1,801.0,7 1,801.017 * 248756 08/28/89 173.00 173.00 248757 08/28/89 20.00 248757 08/28/89 5.00 248757 08/29/89 1,175.64 1,200.64 i 248758 08/28/89 29.0,0 29.00 248759 08/28/89 2,575.917 2,575.97 * * * * ** 248761 08/28/89 44.9 ,8 44.918 248762 08/28/89 272.25 272.25 248764 08/28/89 13.00 13.00 * 248765 08/28/89 11.9,5 11.95 * * * * * ** 248767 08/28/89 120.00 120.00 248768 08/28/89 37.915 248768 08/28/89 82.26 120. ;?1 248769 08/28/89 13,528.00 13,528.00 248771 08/28/89 35.30 R �� CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION JOHN H EKLUND BRUSH DUMPED WINDTALES BANNERS MN DEPT OF JOBS TAX 1ST JOHN PHILLIP REIMBURSEMENT US WEST COMM PHONE US WEST COMM TELEPHONBE US WEST COMM CABLE REPAIR AIRSIGNAL INC GENERAL SUPPLIES FINLEY BROS ENTER CONSTRUCTION GRAPHICS UNLIMITED GENERAL SUPPLIES ROLAND MILLWORK CO REPAIRED DOORS MPLS HEALTH DEPT PRO SERV POLICE BOOKSHELF BOOK A.T.O.M. SEMINAR PHYSICIAN'S DESK REFERENCE (2checks) BOOKS 'PRECISION CLEAN PROD OFFICE SUPPLIES ABM AERIAL LIFE OWENS SERVICES REFUND 09 -05 -89 PAGE 4 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4250 - 644 -64 27- 4504 - 662 -66 848 3220 10- 4160 - 510 -51 10- 4596 - 627 -62 27- 4516 - 661 -66 30- 4256 - 782 -78 3313 40- 4248 - 801 -80 A77927 3278 10- 4504 - 430 -42 60- 1300 - 005 -20 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 420 -42 12688 2802 10- 4540 - 520 -52 C357 1988 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 420 -42 5823 10- 4502 - 420 -42 10- 4202 - 420 -42 10- 4502 - 420 -42 10- 4504 - 540 -54 5479 3109 10- 4901 - 305 -30 258400 1126 10- 3357 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS �j * ** -CKS 5 J_, 1989.CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 09 -05 -89 PAGE CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 248771 08/28/89 5.26 GWENG 5ERVIGES REFUND 40 =3800- 000 -00 49. RON OLSONOSKI 248772 08/28/89 34.23 MERRILL LYNCH REALTY REFUND 40- 3800 - 000 -00 34.23 * 248773 08/28/89 41,067.00 ENGCO CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION 60- 1300 - 005 -20 88022 41,067.00 * 248774 08/28/89 434.04 MARY STEELE REPAIRS 10- 4504 - 420 -42 434.04 * 248775 08/28/89 500.00 COMMERCIAL TURF CONTR SERV 27- 4200 - 664 -66 1135 3051 500.00 * 248776 08/28/89 50.00 RUTH BAKKEN PERFORMANCE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 50.00 * 248777 .08/28/89 125.00 MARY ELLEN SKEESICK PERFORMANCE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 125.00 * 248778 08/28/89 60.00 BECKY BROM PERFORMANCE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 60.00 * 248779 08/28/89 50.00 DIANE RAINES PERFORMANCE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 50.00 * 248780 08/28/89 458.40 OUTPOST HUNT /SPORTS AMMO 29- 4572 - 722 -72 4776 2966 458.40 * 248781 08/29/89 91.00 LAWNMASTR SPRINKLER REFUND 10- 3110 - 490 -49 91.00 * 248782 08/29/89 244.00 DUANE TIMERSON AMBULANCE REFUND 10- 3180 - 000 -00 244.00 * 248783 08/29/89 48.50 ALCO CAPITAL RES GENERAL SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 702 -70 62476 3389 48.50 * 248784 08/29/89 163.40 NANCY KNUDSON PRO SERV 28- 4224 - 701 -70 163.40 * 248785 08/29/89 226.67 ASCAP LICENSES 28- 4204 - 701 -70 033 226.67 * 248786 08/29/89 105.00 MERLE ANDERSON CLEANING 27- 4288 - 669 -66 105.00 * 248787 08/29/89 138.24 SOLVEI SWENSON MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 600 -60 138.24 * 248788 08/29/89 17,643.60 BUCKHORN GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 507 -50 71752 2536 .17,643.60 * 248789 08/29/89 492.00 BELL LUMBER POLES 10- 4540 - 322 -30 19295 3110 5 J_, L= ^:J CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION two IRRIGATION SERV 1989 CITY OF EDINA ERIN LAUB CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT HAROLD NESS AMBULANCE REFUND 492:00 248790 08/29/89 1 960.00 CURT KRIENS CONSTR CONCRETE 960.00 * 248791 08/29/89 144.00 AM PUBLIC WORKS REGISTRATION 144.00 * 248792 08/29/89 29.00 29.00 * 248793 08/29/89 2,294.76 2,294.716 * 248794 08/29/89 295.010 295.00 * 248795 08/29/89 353.9199 353.99 * 248796 08/29/89 361.510 361.50 * 248797 08/29/89 4875.010 4,,875.01 * 248798 08/29/89 549.99 549.99 * 248799 08/29/89 26,797.49 26,797.49 * 248800 08/29/89 215.00 215.00 * 248801 08/29/89 125.00 125.00 * * * * * ** 248AII 08/28/89 130.68 130.68 * * * * ** 248A17 08/28/89 3,031.95. 248A17 08/23/89 591.44 3,623.39 * * * * ** 248A21 08/23/89 185.50 185.50 * * * * ** L= ^:J CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION JOHN E OLSON IRRIGATION SERV BRIDGET SULLIVAN AC INSTRUCTOR ERIN LAUB AC INSTRUCTOR BARTLEY LINDSAY CO BOOSTER PUMP HAROLD NESS AMBULANCE REFUND MARLIN PRO DIV TRAINING AIDS MONA MEYER /MCGRATH PR SERV CURT KRIENS CONSTR CONCRETE NORTHERN HYDRAULICS GAS GENERATOR MINNEGASCO RELOCATING LINES AM PUBLIC WORKS REGISTRATION NATL GOLF FOUND DUES ACE SUPPLY REPAIRS ADS TO GO PRO SERV ADS TO GO ADVERTISING ADT SECURITY SYS. ALARM SERV 09 -05 -89 PAGE 6 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 60- 1300 - 283 -04 3405 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 40- 4540 - 805 -80 212782 1538 10- 3180 - 000 -00 10- 4608 - 281 -28 3644 10- 4201 - 500 -50 35123 27- 4524 - 664 -66 3096 27- 4504 - 664 -66 315494 2968 60 -3300- 289 -04 10- 4202 - 240 -24 27- 4204 - 661 -66 3412 10- 4540 - 646 -64 32030 3200 30- 4201 - 781 -78 3332 30- 4504 - 781 -78 3094 30- 4304 - 782 -78 3311 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 09 -05 -89 PAGE 7 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 248A29 08/23/89 76.52 ALBINSON FIELD EQUIP 10- 4604 - 260 -26 577152 8742 248A29 08/23/89 252.55 ALBINSON FIELD EQUIP 10- 4604 - 260 -26 576615 8742 248A29 08/23/89 37.26 ALBINSON FIELD NOTE BOOKS 10- .4604- 260 -26 577151 8742 366.33 * * * * ** . * ** -CKS 248A41 08/29/89 298.41 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE MEAT 27- 4624 = 663 -66 8918 I 248A41 08/29/89 285.61 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE MEAT 27- 4624 - 663 -66 584.02 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 248A43 08/23/89 138.00 AMER LASER -CUT GRA GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 3315 138.00 * * * ** * ** -CKS 248A45 08/28/89 40.26 AMER. PHOTO COPY GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 F25627 40.26 *.. * * * * ** * ** -CKS 248A53 08/23/89 157.20 AMERICAN SHARECOM TELEPHONE 10-4256- 510 -51 157.20 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 248A60 08/23/89 427.30 ANCHOR PAPER ROLL TOWEL 10- 4512- 520 -52 3080 427.30 * * * ** * ** -CKS 248A67 08/28/89 53.66 AQUA ENGINEERING IRRIGATION SYST 60- 1300 - 005 -20 22335 3099 53.66 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 248B02 08/23/89 229.21 BFI PORTABLE SERV SERVICES 10- 4201 - 646 -64 248602 08/23/89 240.00 BFI PORTABLE SERV SERVICES 10- 4504 - 505 -50 3217 248602 08/23/89 65.75 BFI PORTABLE SERV SERVICES 27- 4288 - 664 -66 3092 534.96 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 248605 08/23/89 32.20 BACH -BILL POSTAGE 30- 4290 - 781 -78 248605 08/23/89 24.54 BACH -BILL GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 781 -78 248605 08/23/89 16.50 BACH -BILL GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 248605 08/23/89 47.28 BACH -BILL OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 120.52 248606 08/28/89 34.15 BACHMANS SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 318 -30 34.15 248607 08/23/89 9.20.47 BADGER METER INC WATER METERS 40- 1220 - 000 -00 594318 1802 I i 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 248B07 08/28/89 248B07 08/23/89 248B07 08/28/89 * * * * ** 2736 248B13 08/29/89 * * * * ** 2096 248B18 08/28/89 248618 08/28/89 248618 08/28/89 248618 08/28/89 248B18 08/28/89 248B18 08/28/89 248B18 08/28/89 248B18 08/28/89 248627 08/23/89 248B27 08/23/89 248B27 08/23/89 231.00 248B30 08/28/89 248630 08/23/89 248B30 08/28/89 248B30 08/23/89 248B30 08/23/89 248630 08/28/89 248B30 08/28/89 248B30 08/28/89 248630 08/23/89 248B30 08/23/89 248B30 08/23/89 * * * * ** 248832 08/29/89 * * * *** 248B61 08/29/89 AMOUNT 10- 4540 - 560 -56 87.76 2736 72.61 10- 4540 - 560 -56 27.74 2736 1,108.58 *. 2,490.00 2096 2,490.00 10- 4540 - 560 -56 65.50 2850 655.50- 10- 4540- 560 -56 172.80 2744 321.18 10- 4540 - 560 -56 104.26 3098 321.18 10- 4540 - 560 -56 655.50 2736 8.50 10- 4620 - 560 -56 993.42 1726 134.00 50- 4626 - 822 -82 231.00 330.00 50- 4626 - 842 -84 695.00 5.04 50- 4626 - 862 -86 21.68 4.710 51.87 22.51 60.44 8.510 761.00 .88 336.16 15.218 1,288.06 56.25 56.25 130.83 130.83 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION BADGER METER INC METER PARTS BADGER METER INC METER PARTS BADGER METER INC METER PARTS BARR ENGINEERING BATTERY WAREHOUSE BATTERY WAREHOUSE BATTERY WAREHOUSE BATTERY WAREHOUSE BATTERY WAREHOUSE BATTERY WAREHOUSE BATTERY WAREHOUSE BATTERY WAREHOUSE BERGFORD TRUCKING BERGFORD TRUCKING BERGFORD TRUCKING BERTELSON•BROS. INC BERTELSON.BROS. INC BERTELSON BROS. INC BERTELSON BROS. INC BERTELSON BROS. INC BERTELSON BROS. INC BERTELSON BROS. INC BERTELSON BROS. INC BERTELSON BROS. INC BERTELSON BROS. INC BERTELSON BROS. INC PRO SERV ENG 09 -05 -89 PAGE 8 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 40- 4540 - 807 -80 594691 1802 40- 4540 - 807 -80 593788 1802 40- 4540 - 807 -80 594692 1802 41- 4201 - 900 -90 BRAKES 10- 4540 - 560 -56 52108 2736 BRAKES. 10- 4540 - 560 -56 52108 2736 BULBS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 44757 2096 BATTERIES 10- 4540 - 560 -56 53471 2850 BRAKE SHOES 10- 4540- 560 -56 52416 2744 BATTERY 10- 4540 - 560 -56 56790 3098 BRAKES 10- 4540 - 560 -56 52108 2736 STRAPS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 51652 1726 LIQUOR DEL 50- 4626 - 822 -82 LIQUOR DEL 50- 4626 - 842 -84 LIQUOR DEL 50- 4626 - 862 -86 GENERAL SUPPLIES BINDERS PENCILS BINDERS SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PENCILS EQUIP REPLA OFFICE SUPPLIES BINDERS BINDERS BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS CORES 10- 4504- 140 -14 10- 4504 - 160 -16 10- 4504 - 180 -18 10- 4504 - 200 -20 10 -4504- 260 -26 10- 4504 - 510 -51 10- 4504 - 560 -56 10- 4901 - 420 -42 30- 4516 - 781 -78 40 -4504- 800 -80 40- 4504 - 800 -80 491608 491608 491608 493368 487515 2913 488297 3321 491745 471745 40- 4540 - 802 -80 94918 3029 BOUSTEAD ELEC & MFG. REPAIR MOTOR 10- 4248 - 390 -30 3352 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS x^* -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 248677 08/23/89 248677 08/29/89 248677 08/29/89 248677 08/29/89 248677 08/29/89 248678 08/28/89 248682 08/28/89 * * * * ** BRAUN ENG TESTNG INC 248C04 08/28/89 248C05 08/28/89 248C05 08/28/89 248C05 08/28/89 248C05 08/28/89 248C05 08/28/89 248C05 08/28/89 248C05 08/28/89 248C05 08/28/89 248C05 08/28/89 248C05 08/28/89 248C05 08/28/89 248C05 08/28/89 248C05 08/28/89 248C05 08/28/89 248C05 08/28/89 248C05 08/28/89 * * * * ** 248C09 08/28/89 * * * * ** 248C12 08/28/89 248C13 08/28/89 * * * * ** 248C17 08/28/89 ii - %aw CHECK REGISTER 09 -05 -89 PAGE 9 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 150.00 BRAUN ENG TESTNG INC SOIL TEST 27- 4200 - 664 -66 06800 2355 70.00 BRAUN ENG TESTNG INC PRO SERV 40- 4201 - 800 -80 17428 1,391.80 BRAUN ENG TESTNG INC REMODELING 60- 1300 - 014 -20 17302 188.00 BRAUN ENG TESTNG INC PRO SERV 60- 1300 - 289 -04 17430 322.40 BRAUN ENG TESTNG INC TESTING SERV 60 -1300- 381 -01 17449 2,122.20 * 71.94 BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC PARTS /LABOR 10- 4504 - 510 -51 131723 71.94 * * ** -CKS 82.64 BRUNSON INSTRUMENT NAILS 10- 4504 - 260 -26 077426 2684 82.64 * ** -CKS 369.00 CAMPBELL SPORTS SOCCER T- SHIRTS 10- 4504 - 621 -62 17370 3331 369.00 63.31 CAMPBELL -RALPH TELEPHONE BILL 12- 4202 - 434 -43 8.50 CAMPBELL -RALPH CONT ED 12- 4202 - 434 -43 29.65 CAMPBELL -RALPH MEETING EXP 12- 4206 - 434 -43 20.75 CAMPBELL -RALPH MEETING EXP 12- 4206 - 434 -43 17.70 CAMPBELL -RALPH MEETING EXP 12- 4206 - 434 -43 31.29 CAMPBELL -RALPH MEETING EXP 12- 4206 - 434 -43 27.47 CAMPBELL- RALPH. MEETING EXP 12- 4206 - 434 -43 38.49 CAMPBELL -RALPH MEETING 12- 4206 - 434 -43 34.30 CAMPBELL -RALPH MEETING EXP 12- 4206 - 434 -43 16.20 CAMPBELL -RALPH EQUIP 12- 4206 - 434 -43 43.91 CAMPBELL -RALPH MEETING EXP 12- 4206 - 434 -43 24.06 CAMPBELL -RALPH GENERAL SUPPLIES 12- 4504 - 434 -43 14.25 CAMPBELL -RALPH PHOTO SUPPLIES 12- 4508 - 434 -43 37.22 CAMPBELL -RALPH EQUIP 12- 4902 - 434 -43 18.09 CAMPBELL -RALPH EQUIP NEW 12- 4902 - 434 -43 225.00 CAMPBELL -RALPH EQUIP 12- 4902 - 434 -43 650.19 * ** -CKS 116.35 CARLSON PRINTING BUSINESS CARDS 10- 4504 - 510 -51 45461 116.35 * ** -CKS 82.00 CORNER MARKING CO SIGNS 27- 4516 - 661 -66 317 2909 82'.00 * 26.44 CASH REGISTER SALES RIBBONS 27- 4516 - 661 -66 373891 3335 26.44 * I * ** -CKS 87.28 CDP COPY MACH 10- 4504 - 540 -54 107472 ' I 09 -05 -89 PAGE 10 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 40- 4274 - 803 -80 7014 2860 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 56.0 -56 52286 3179 ,J * ** -CKS; 30- 4214 - 781 -78 104007 3409 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 643 -64 2749 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 500 -50 9484 * ** -CKS 10- 4258 - 446 -44 10- 4258 - 646 -64 60- 1300 - 015 -20 10- 4201 - 600 -60 70230 41- 4204 - 900 -90 79034 * ** -CKS 10- 4248 - 440 -44 C50705 2528 10- 4248 - 560 -56 3353 10- 4540 - 440 -44 C50705 2528 10-4264- 358 -30 5049 9248 * ** -CKS 30- 4248 - 782 -78 10019 3317 * ** -CKS 10- 4248 - 440 -44 2734 2519 . 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 248C19 08/28/89 * * * * ** 248C22 08/23/89 * * * * ** 248C25 08/29/89 * * * * ** 248C27 08/28/89 * * * * ** AIRLESS JACKHAMMER 248C31 08/23/89 * * * * ** 248C33 08/23/89 24BC33 08/23/89 248C33 08/29/89 248C34 08/23/89 248C34 08/29/89 * * * * ** 248C38 08/28/89 248C38 08/29/89 248C38 08/28/89 248C39 08/28/89 * * * * ** 248C61 08/23/89 * * * * ** 248C92 08/23/89 09 -05 -89 PAGE 10 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 40- 4274 - 803 -80 7014 2860 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 56.0 -56 52286 3179 ,J * ** -CKS; 30- 4214 - 781 -78 104007 3409 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 643 -64 2749 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 500 -50 9484 * ** -CKS 10- 4258 - 446 -44 10- 4258 - 646 -64 60- 1300 - 015 -20 10- 4201 - 600 -60 70230 41- 4204 - 900 -90 79034 * ** -CKS 10- 4248 - 440 -44 C50705 2528 10- 4248 - 560 -56 3353 10- 4540 - 440 -44 C50705 2528 10-4264- 358 -30 5049 9248 * ** -CKS 30- 4248 - 782 -78 10019 3317 * ** -CKS 10- 4248 - 440 -44 2734 2519 . CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 87.2.8 * 160.0,8 CEI SALES AIRLESS JACKHAMMER 160.08 * 110.87 CERT POWER TRAIN DRIVESHAFT 110.87 * 52.22 CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO ADVERTISING 52.22 * 406.00 CHEMLAWN CONTRACT SPRAYING 406.00 5,000.00 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON AIRPORT STUDY 5,000.00 145.70 CITY OF EDINA WATER 27.110 CITY OF EDINA WATER 575.00 CITY OF EDINA SAC 74740 12,473.00 CITY OF RICHFIELD SERVICES 200.9',6 CITY OF RICHFIELD POWER 12,673.96 1,050.0,0 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP AIR PAC SERV 270.8,5 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP SERV /AIR PAC 1,071.4,5 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP AIR PAC SERV 2,392.30 * 330:00 CLEAN -FLO LAB HERBICIDE TREAT 330.00 * 236.18 COMTECH INC.. CONTR REPAIRS 236.18 * 222.00 CUSTOM FIRE APP STOBE LITE BAR 09 -05 -89 PAGE 10 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 40- 4274 - 803 -80 7014 2860 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 56.0 -56 52286 3179 ,J * ** -CKS; 30- 4214 - 781 -78 104007 3409 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 643 -64 2749 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 500 -50 9484 * ** -CKS 10- 4258 - 446 -44 10- 4258 - 646 -64 60- 1300 - 015 -20 10- 4201 - 600 -60 70230 41- 4204 - 900 -90 79034 * ** -CKS 10- 4248 - 440 -44 C50705 2528 10- 4248 - 560 -56 3353 10- 4540 - 440 -44 C50705 2528 10-4264- 358 -30 5049 9248 * ** -CKS 30- 4248 - 782 -78 10019 3317 * ** -CKS 10- 4248 - 440 -44 2734 2519 . - • .. .. - -. ., -- _ w ,. ..... .. - ,,, ... �: v.+.r- .3�. ?'.�ib.w�rmwwa.0 sawm,...,wu.a-..., �.., ., ., i .u. ,. .,, .. .,.._ .. .. .. . _. n _ .. .,._. ,.. 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 09 -05 -89 PAGE 11 CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 248C92 08/23/89 750.00 CUSTOM FIRE APP STROBE LITE BAR 10- 4901 - 440 -44 2734 2519 972.00 248C93 08/28/89 475.00 CERT.HYD SPEC HYD PUMP 10 -4540- 560 -56 59505 2928 475.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 24.8C97 08/23/89 375.00 CYLINDER CITY HYDR CYLINDER 10- 4540 - 560 -56 24136 3108 375.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 248D07 08/23/89 50.09 D. C. HEY CO. SERV CONTRACTS 30- 4288 - 781 -78 248D07 08/28/89 50.09 D. C. HEY CO. SEWER CONTRACT 30- 4288 - 781 -78 127943 3342 100.18 * * * ** * ** -CKS 248D31 08/23/89 353.25 DAVIES WATER EQUIP FLUSHING HYDR 40- 4504 - 803 -80 11128 2705 353.25 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 248D33 08/29/89 514.50 DAVIS - EUGENE WEED CONTROL 10- 4201 - 600 -60 248D33 08/29/89 61.92 DAVIS- EUGENE MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 600 -60 576.42 * * * * ** • * ** -CKS 248D37 08/28/89 63.58 DAY- TIMERS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 3339 63.58 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 248D88 08/28/89 283.44 DUO CHEM SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 560 -56 4221 2762 283.44 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 248E14 08/28/89 134.40 EARL F. ANDERSON MATERIAL 10- 4504 - 325 -30 89997 2964 248E14 08/23/89 322.80 EARL F..ANDERSON SIGNS 10- 4542 - 325 -30 90007 2461 457.20 * * * ** * ** -CKS 248E20 08/23/89 85.00 ECOLAB PEST ELIM. SERV CONTRACT 30- 4288 - 782 -78 P44161 3320 85.00 * * * * ** 248E23 ECONOMICS PRESS * ** -CKS - 2485 @@ 08/28/89 17.02 SPINA G WA.M 09 GGM DUES 10- 4204 - 420 -42 17.02 * * * * ** * ** -CKS %rd 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 09 -05 -89 PAGE 12 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 248E63 08/29/89 53.22 ELECTRONIC CENTER ELEC PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 796240 3037 53.22 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 248E75 08/29/89 230.00 EMPLOYEES CLUB SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 500 -50 230.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 248E94 08/28/89 425.00 ESS BROS & SONS MAN HOLE FRAME 40- 4552 - 900 -80 5778 2677 .41y 248E94 08/28/89 175.00 ESS BROS & SONS - STORM DRAIN 40- 4552 - 902 -80 5848 2845 600.00 *' * * * * ** * ** -CKS 248F02 08/23/89 499.80 FACILITY SYSTEMS PD REMODELING 10- 4901 - 420 -42 39860 2905 499.80 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 248F11 08/29/89 522.08 FEED RITE CONTROL CHLORINE 26- 4564 - 682 -68 127361 1056 248F11 08/29/89 313.25 FEED RITE CONTROL CHLORINE 26- 4564 - 682 -68 128485 1056 248F11 08/23/89 2,660.94 FEED RITE CONTROL WATER CHEM 40- 4622 - 805 -80 127745 1670 3,496.27 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 248F76 08/28/89 16.95 FLAHERTY EQUIP CORP CONDENSER 10- 4540 - 560 -56 1364 16.95 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 248G08 08/28/89 4,467.85 G.L. CONTRACTING INC REPAIR 41- 4248 - 900 -90 27049 3265 4,467.85 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 248G24 08/28/89 8.00 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS ANTENNA 10- 4504 - 440 -44 53707 248G24 08/28/89 27.30 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS, REPAIRS 27- 4248 - 664 -66 53643 2999 35.30 * * * * ** * ** -CKS_ 248G42 08/28/89 142.89 GIL HEBARD GUNS AMMO 29- 4572 - 722 -72 5988 3215 142.89 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 248G44 08/28/89 50.0,0 GLEN SIPE PIANO SERV SERVICE CONTRACT 30- 4288 - 782 -78 890817 3338 50.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 248G68 08/29/89 7.94 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. REDUCERS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 252007 3103 _ 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK N0. DATE 248G68 08/29/89 A * * k k k 248G96 08/23/89 R k k k k 248H21 08/23/89 k k* k k k .248H33 08/28/89 k k k k k k 248I23 08/28/89 248I23 08/28/89 k k k k k k 248I77 08/29/89 k k k* k k 248J27 08/23/89 k k 248J31 08/29/89 248J31 08/29/89 248J31 08/29/89 248J31 08/29/89 248J31 08/29/89 248J31 08/29/89 248J31 08/29/89 248J31 08/29/89 248J31 08/29/89 248J31 08/29/89 248J31 08/29/89 248J31 08/29/89 248J31 08/29/89 248J31 08/29/89 248J31 08/29/89 248J31 08/29/89 248J31 08/29/89 248J31 08/29/89 248J31 08/29/89 AMOUNT 89.66 97.60 31.55 31.55 * 242.95 242.95 * 636.27 636.27 * 32.74 19.14 51.88 80.20 80.20 * 26.33 26.33 * 192.31 30.39 75.13 34.06 18.69 33.86 1.88 75.86 15.08 127.19 303.22 18.00 19.66 45.8.0 25.94 87.97 44.55 61.25 24.67 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. ELEC PARTS GUY SPEAKER CO. CHARTS /INK HARMON GLASS HENN CTY SHERIFF INDELCO CORP INDELCO CORP ISI JERRYS FOODS JERRYS HARDWARE JERRYS HARDWARE JERRYS HARDWARE JERRYS HARDWARE JERRYS HARDWARE JERRYS HARDWARE JERRYS HARDWARE JERRYS HARDWARE JERRYS HARDWARE JERRYS HARDWARE JERRYS HARDWARE JERRYS HARDWARE JERRYS HARDWARE JERRYS HARDWARE JERRYS HARDWARE JERRYS HARDWARE JERRYS HARDWARE JERRYS HARDWARE JERRYS HARDWARE Sao GLASS REPAIR BOOKING FEES IRRIGATION SYST IRRIGATION SYST TEST EQUIP GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS LAMPS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 09 -05 -89 PAGE 13 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4540 - 520 -52 252007 3116 40- 4540 - 801 -80 32.105 3118 10- 4248 - 560 -56 189511 3015. 10- 4286 - 220 -22 60- 1300 - 005 -20 44283 3130 60- 1300 - 005 -20 44385 3206 10 -4540- 560 -56 68785 3119 23- 4504- 611 -61 10- 4504 - 301 -30 10- 4504 - 322 -30 10- 4504 - 325 -30 10- 4504 - 390 -30 10- 4504 - 420 -42 10- 4504 - 440 -44 10- 4504 - 507 -50 10- 4504 - 520 -52 10 -4504- 540 -54 10- 4504 - 560 -56 10- 4504 - 646 -64 10- 4504 - 646 -64 10- 4504 - 782 -78 10- 4512- 540 -54 10- 4540 - 520 -52 10- 4540 - 540 -54 10- 4604 - 260 -26 27- 4504 - 661 -66 27- 4504- 666 -66 * ** -CKS i * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 248J31 08/29/89. 248J31 08/29/89 248J31 08/29/89 248J31 08/29/89 248J31 08/29/89 248J31 08/29/89 * * * * ** HARDWARE 248J35 08/29/89 JERRYS HARDWARE 248J41 08/23/89 * * * * ** GENERAL 248K09 08/28/89 248K09 08/29/89 * * * * ** 248K35 08/23/89 248K35 08/28/89 248K35 08/28/89 248K35 08/28/89 248K35 08/28/89 248K35 08/29/89 248K35 08/29/89 248K35 08/29/89 248K35 08/28/89 248K35 08/29/89 248K35 08/23/89 248K35 08/23/89 * * * * ** 248K38 08/29/89 * * * * ** 248K42 08/28/89 248K42 08/28/89 248K42 08/28/89 248K42 08/23/89 248K42 08/23/89 * * * * ** AMOUNT 37.35 24.53 98.99 133.44 24.41 21.97 1,576.,20 66.67 66.67 77.70 77.70 157.79 2Al 429.20* 491729 44.27 51 .;48 48.27 299.59 10 .'47 26 . X85 73.119 53.54 105.97�s .,;_- 106.99 29.89 71.98 922.49* 72.48 7248 5,247.98 5,172.21 5 , 113 .173 5;238.10 5,149.15 25,921.!17 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION JERRYS HARDWARE CLEANING SUPPLIES JERRYS HARDWARE REPAIRS JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES JERRYS HARDWARE REPIAR PARTS JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES JERRYS PRINTING JIM HATCH SALES KAMAN BEARING & SPLY KAMAN BEARING & SPLY KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNUTSON -JIM KOCH MATERIALS CO KOCH MATERIALS CO KOCH MATERIALS CO KOCH MATERIALS CO KOCH MATERIALS CO PRINTING BROOMS BEARINGS REPAIR MATERIAL HARDWARE WOOD LUMBER WOOD PLYWOOD GENERAL SUPPLIES LUMBER LUMBER REPAIR REPAIR REPAIR MILEAGE ROAD OIL ROAD OIL ROAD OIL ROAD OIL ROAD OIL 09 -05 -89 PAGE 14 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 27- 4512 - 663 -66 28- 4248 - 702 -70 40- 4504- 801 -80 40- 4504 - 801 -80 40- 4540 - 805 -80. 50- 4504 - 841 -84 30- 4600 - 781 -78 7014 3404 10- 4580 - 301 -30 9647 2933 10- 4540 - 560 -56 2745 23- 4248 - 704 -70 670466 3300 10- 4504 - 325 -30 10- 4504 - 646 -64 10- 4604 - 646 -64 10- 4604 - 646 -64 10- 4604 - 646 -64 10- 4620 - 560 -56 27- 4504 - 662 -66 27- 4504 - 666 -66 27- 4504 - 666 -66 28- 4248 - 704 -70 28- 4248 - 704 -70 28- 4248 - 704 -70 10- 4208 - 160 -16 542953 3105 551359 3281 525900 3213 542852 3260 551753 3052 548800 3123 447295 3728 526080 3330 551805 3092 542856 3302 551839 3086 542807 3150 10- 4526- 314 -30 808949 1106 10- 4526 - 314 -30 803177 1106 10- 4526- 314 -30 803858 1106 10- 4526 - 314 -30 807242 1106 10- 4526 - 314 -30 805542 1106 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * *.* -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS ,f r y, * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 09 -05 -89 PAGE 15 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 248L04 08/28/89 4,210.00 LAHASS PLATFORM BODY 10- 4901 - 650 -64 5523 2877 4,210.00 ** * ** * ** -CKS 24.8L06 08/28/89 28.00 - LAKE RESTORATION WEED CONTROL 41- 4248 - 902 -90 9204 3284 248L06 08/28/89 28.00 LAKE RESTORATION WEED CONTROL 41- 4248 - 902 -90 9204 3284 248L06 08/28/89 280.00 LAKE RESTORATION WEED CONTROL 41- 4248 - 902 -90 9204 3284 280.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 248L08 08/23/89 15.48 LAKE STATE EQUIP. WHEEL BOLTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 56558 3100 15.48 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 248L22 08/23/89 180.00 LANDSCAPE & TURF MARKR POINTS 27- 4504 - 664 -66 3995 3031 248L22 08/23/89 263.00 LANDSCAPE & TURF SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 664 -66 3996 3033 248L22 08/23/89 588.00 LANDSCAPE & TURF -SEED 27- 4562 - 664 -66 4021 3140 1,031.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS i 248L28 08/23/89 337.80 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS /SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 322 -30 2864 248L28. 08/23/89 163.34 LAWSON PRODUCTS RIVETS 10- 4504 - 325 -30 2237 248L28 08/23/89 298.66 LAWSON PRODUCTS TIE STRAPS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 2869 248L28 08/23/89 188.43 LAWSON PRODUCTS SCREWS 40- 4504 - 801 -80 2867 248L28 08/23/89 230.45• LAWSON PRODUCTS BOLTS 40- 4504- 801 -80 2868 248L28 08/23/89 481.63 LAWSON PRODUCTS BOLTS 40- 4504 - 801 -80 2870 248L28 08/23/89 371.00 LAWSON.PRODUCTS CLIP FASTENERS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 2866 248L28 08/28/89 522.09 LAWSON PRODUCTS BOLTS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 2669 248L28 08/23/89 371.12 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540- 803 -80 2865 j 2,964.52 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 248L36 08/28/89 53.00 LEFFLER PRINTING PRINTING 30- 4600 - 781 -78 3827 3224 53.00 * * * ** * ** -CKS 248L48 08/23/89 497.25 LIGHTING RESOURCES GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 3221 497.25 * * * ** * ** -CKS 248L52 08/23/89 49.50 LINJO ASSOC H2O TREATMENT 30- 4564 - 783 -78 12317 2723 49.50 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 248L60 08/23/89 2,855.50 LOGIS DATA PROC 10- 4233 - 160 -16 248L60 08/23/89 791.85 LOGIS DATA PROC 10- 4233 - 200 -20 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 248L60 08/23/89 248L60 08/23/89 248L60 08/23/89 248L60 08/23/89 248L60 08/23/89 * * * * ** PROC 248M04 08/23/89 * * * * ** 248M25 08/23/89 321102 LOGIS 248M27 08/28/89 248M27 08/28/89 248M27 08/28/89 248M27 08/23/89 248M27 08/29/89 248M27 08/23/89 248M27 08/28/89 248M27 08/23/89 248M27 08/23/89 248M27 08/28/89 248M27 08/28/89 248M27 08/23/89 248M27 08/29/89 248M27 08/23/89 248M27 08/28/89 248M27 08/23/89 * * * * ** MERIT 248M35 08/23/89 * * * * ** 248M42 08/23/89 248M42 08/28/89 248M42 08/23/89 * * * * ** 248M44 08/28/89 * * * * * * 10,1091.84 * 195.30 MAGNUSON SOD CO. SOD 195!30 * 36.71 CHECK REGISTER MED OXYGEN & EQUIP OXYGEN AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 3475.08 LOGIS DATA PROC 2,,024136 LOGIS DATA PROC 321102 LOGIS DATA PROC 321102 LOGIS DATA PROC 321101 LOGIS DATA PROC 10,1091.84 * 195.30 MAGNUSON SOD CO. SOD 195!30 * 36.71 MED OXYGEN & EQUIP OXYGEN 36171 478.50 MERIT SUPPLY SEALER 453!25 MERIT SUPPLY TAR REMOVER 21134 MERIT SUPPLY SUPPLY . 241!00 MERIT SUPPLY - GENERAL SUPPLIES 341150 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 339115 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 438165 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANER 1,160!00 MERIT SUPPLY FERTILIZER 356!70 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANERS 388150 MERIT SUPPLY DEGREASER 447!50 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES. 441!50 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 495!98 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 414!00 MERIT SUPPLY TOWELS 113!15 MERIT SUPPLY ODOR CONTROL 414!00 MERIT•SUPPLY CLEAN TOWELS 6,544!72 220 257178 METRO WASTE CONTROL SEWER SERVICE 220,257178 * 87!36 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR 186.189 MIDWEST ASPHALT CDR 15.76 MIDWEST ASPHALT CDR 290.01 BLACKTOP BLACKTOP BLACKTOP 104.08 MIDWEST CHEM SUPPLY GARBAGE BAGS 104.08 * 09 -05 -89 PAGE 16 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4233 - 420 -42 40- 4233 - 800 -80 50- 4233 - 820 -82 50- 4233 - 840 -84 50- 4233 - 860 -86 10- 4504- 301 -30 10- 4540 - 440 -44 10- 4504 - 301 -30 10- 4504 - 314 -30 10- 4504 - 390 -30 10- 4504 - 560 -56 10- 4504 - 646 -64 10- 4504 - 646 -64 10- 4512 - 540 -54 10- 4558 - 643 -64 10- 4620 - 560 -56 10- 4620 - 560 -56 30- 4504 - 782 -78 30- 4504 - 782 -78 30- 4512 - 782 -78 40- 4504 - 801 -80 40- 4504 - 801 -80 40- 4504 - 801 -80 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1324 * ** -CKS 22279 2899 22207 2768 22210 2767 22336 3035 22392 3191 22303 2952 22247 2861 22374 3095 22305 2960 22246 2862 22414 3298 22365 3172 22427 3323 22304 2953 22285 2938 22346 3045 40- 4312 - 812 -80 7049 10- 4524 - 301 -30 2077 10- 4524 - 301 -30 2139 10- 4524 - 314 -30 2077 10- 4504 - 440 -44 25530 2529 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 09 -05 -89 PAGE 17 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 26- 4624 - 683 -68 27- 4624 - 662 -66 8925 27- 4624 - 663 -66 * ** -CKS 28- 4248 - 704 -70 98421 3066 10- 4504 - 140 -14 * ** -CKS 60- 1300 - 015 -20 8285 i * ** -CKS i 10- 4204 - 100 -10 10- 4204 - 140 -14 10- 4226 - 420 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4274 - 440 -44 135118 3231 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 646 -64 33738 2396 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 774469 2886 27- 4540 - 664 -66 776034 2998 27- 4540 - 664 -66 778087 3173 27- 4540 - 664 -66 776707 3032 27- 4540- 664 -66 777693 3152 60- 1300 - 005 -20 775458 2324 * ** -CKS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 73111 * ** -CKS 10- 4226 - 420 -42 9697 i 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 248M46 08/23/89 248M46 08/29/89 248M46 08/28/89 * * * * ** HOT DOG BUNS 248M53 08/29/89 248M54 08/28/89 * * * * ** 248M57 08/23/89 424.35 * 248M68 08/23/89 248M68 08/23/89 248M68 08/29/89 * * * * ** * 248M70 08/28/89 21.00 248M76 08/28/89 * * * * ** * 248M81 08/28/89 248M81 08/23/89 248M81 08/28/89 248M81 08/23/89 248M81. 08/28/89 248M81 .08/28/89 * * * * ** CAR PHONE 248M85 08/29/89 * * * * ** CAR PHONE 248M88 08/28/89 09 -05 -89 PAGE 17 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 26- 4624 - 683 -68 27- 4624 - 662 -66 8925 27- 4624 - 663 -66 * ** -CKS 28- 4248 - 704 -70 98421 3066 10- 4504 - 140 -14 * ** -CKS 60- 1300 - 015 -20 8285 i * ** -CKS i 10- 4204 - 100 -10 10- 4204 - 140 -14 10- 4226 - 420 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4274 - 440 -44 135118 3231 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 646 -64 33738 2396 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 774469 2886 27- 4540 - 664 -66 776034 2998 27- 4540 - 664 -66 778087 3173 27- 4540 - 664 -66 776707 3032 27- 4540- 664 -66 777693 3152 60- 1300 - 005 -20 775458 2324 * ** -CKS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 73111 * ** -CKS 10- 4226 - 420 -42 9697 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 20.48 METZ BAKING CO HOT DOG BUNS 218.87 METZ BAKING CO BREAD 185.00 METZ BAKING CO BREAD 424.35 * 66.75 MILHOFF STEEL REPAIR 66.75 * 21.00 MILLER -DAVIS CO. MIN BOOK PAGES 21.00 * 3,013.08 i MILLER - DUNWIDDIE ARNESON HOUSE 3,013.08 77.75 MN. CELLULAR TEL. CAR PHONE 195.45 MN. CELLULAR TEL. CAR PHONE 247.10 MN. CELLULAR TEL. EQUIP RENTAL 520.30 242.00 MN. CONWAY SERVICES 242.00 * 63.58 MN. GLOVE GENERAL SUPPLIES 63.58 * 432.00 MN. TORO INC. PARTS 115.37 MN. TORO INC. IRRIGATIONS PARTS 59.81 MN. TORO INC. MOWER PARTS 53.70 MN. TORO INC. MOWER PARTS 60.04 MN. TORO INC. MOWER PARTS 82.06 MN. TORO INC. IRRIGATION SYST 802.98 40.40 MN. WANNER LEATHER WASH 40.40 20.00 MOBILE CELLULAR UNL. EQUIP RENTAL 20.00 * 09 -05 -89 PAGE 17 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 26- 4624 - 683 -68 27- 4624 - 662 -66 8925 27- 4624 - 663 -66 * ** -CKS 28- 4248 - 704 -70 98421 3066 10- 4504 - 140 -14 * ** -CKS 60- 1300 - 015 -20 8285 i * ** -CKS i 10- 4204 - 100 -10 10- 4204 - 140 -14 10- 4226 - 420 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4274 - 440 -44 135118 3231 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 646 -64 33738 2396 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 774469 2886 27- 4540 - 664 -66 776034 2998 27- 4540 - 664 -66 778087 3173 27- 4540 - 664 -66 776707 3032 27- 4540- 664 -66 777693 3152 60- 1300 - 005 -20 775458 2324 * ** -CKS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 73111 * ** -CKS 10- 4226 - 420 -42 9697 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE * * * * ** AMOUNT 248M97 08/23/89 10,682.16 10,682.16 * * * * * ** 09 -05 -89 PAGE 18 248NO3 08/23/89 486.00 # P.O. # MESSAGE 486.00 * * * * * ** 248N07 08/29/89 257.88 1T 248N07 08/23/89 15.30 248N07 08/23/89 57.48 330.66* 346. ia* * * * * ** REPAIR SERV 40- 4248 - 801 -80 20135 248N09 08/28/89 324.50 2418N09 08/28/89 464.16 * ** -CKS MTS NW SOUND GENERAL SUPPLIES 788.66 76821 * * * * ** 248N13 08/28/89 43.45 I 248N13 08/23/89 43.45 MTS NW SOUND GENERAL SUPPLIES 86.90 76553 * * * * ** 248N21 08/28/89 4.81 * ** -CKS 248N21 08/28/89 75.98 1698 248N21 08/28/89 96.11 LIGHT ASSY 248N21 08/28/89 4.65 248N21 08/28/89 35.93 248N21 08/28/89 77.76 ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 822 -82 108909 295.24 * * * * ** 248N31 08/23/89 32.25 32.25 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 248N37 08/28/89 104.45 475446 3210 0 104.45 SERV KIT 10- 4540- 560 -56 475791 2958 248N54 08/29/89 3.00 475354 248N54 08/29/89 7.68 SWITCH 10- 4540 - 560 -56 472094 10.68 d CHECK REGISTER 09 -05 -89 PAGE 18 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * *, -CKS MPLS FINANCE DEPT. WATER 40- 4640 - 803 -80 * ** -CKS MPLS SEWER & WATER REPAIR SERV 40- 4248 - 801 -80 20135 3190 * ** -CKS MTS NW SOUND GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 76821 3396 MTS NW SOUND GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 76469 3318 MTS NW SOUND GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 76553 3319 * ** -CKS MUNICILITE CO. LIGHTS /FLASH 10- 4620 - 560 -56 1698 3122 MUNICILITE CO. LIGHT ASSY 10- 4620 - 560 -56 1635 2681 * ** -CKS MUZAK ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 822 -82 108909 MUZAK ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS NAPA AUTO PARTS PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 475446 3210 0 NAPA AUTO PARTS SERV KIT 10- 4540- 560 -56 475791 2958 NAPA AUTO PARTS TRANS PART 10- 4540 - 560 -56 475354 2944 NAPA AUTO PARTS SWITCH 10- 4540 - 560 -56 472094 3271 NAPA AUTO PARTS MASTER CYCL 10- 4540 - 560 -56 475323 2939 NAPA AUTO PARTS CUSHION 10- 4620 - 560 -56 492876 2954 x**-CKS NEBCO DISTRIBUTING CONCESSIONS. 26- 4624 - 683 -68 011164 9746 * ** -CKS NFPA BOOKS 10- 4650 - 440 -44 234377 3230 * ** -CKS NORTHERN AIRE HOSE 26- 4504 - 682 -68 4523 NORTHERN AIRE CHLORINE TABLETS 26- 4504 - 682 -68 4514 d 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE * * * * ** 248N62 08/29/89 248017 08/23/89 * * * * ** 248036 08/28/89 248037 08/28/89. 248037 08/28/89 CHECK REGISTER * * * * ** 09- 05 248P03_ 08/29/89 * * * * ** 248P31 08/28/89 * * * * ** # P.O. 248P48 08/23/89 248P48 08/28/89 248P48 08/28/89 * * * * ** 248P56 08/28/89 * * * * ** NORTHLAND ELEC SUP 248P66 08/28/89 * * * * ** 3322 248P84 08/23/89 * * * * ** 248Q09 08/29/89 r+� CHECK REGISTER 09- 05 -89, PAGE 19 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 115.56 NORTHLAND ELEC SUP IRRIGATION PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 269090 3322 115.56 * * ** -CKS 69.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS SERV CONRACT 10- 4288 - 510 -51 088108 69.00 * * ** -CKS 33.00 OLSON CHAIN & CABLE REPAIRS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 90685 2955 33.00 * 135.00 BILL OLSON DIRT FILL 10- 4504 - 301 -30 405.00 BILL OLSON BLACK DIRT 10- 4562 - 643 -64 540.00 * *** -CKS i 1,749.16 PACE LAB WATER TESTING 40- 4201 - 801 -80 34835 3277 1,749.16 * ** -CKS i j 750.00 PETER COTTON SERVICES 10- 4201 - 440 -44 750.00 * ** -CKS 31.90 PIP PRINTING PRINTING 30- 4600 - 781 - 78.5271 3253 187.60 PIP PRINTING PRINTING 30- 4600 - 781 -78 5324 3324 37.50 PIP PRINTING PRINTING 30- 4600 - 781 -78 5344 3334 -257.00 *. * ** -CKS i! 93.75 PLASTIC BAGMART GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 507 -50 4991 3087 93.75 x**-CKS 102.00 PONY EXP RELOADERS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 430 -42 102:00 * ** -CKS 393.75 PRO INSTANT PRINT BLDG INSP SLIPS 10- 4504 - 490 -49 393.75 * ** -CKS 42.50 QUALITY REFRIG REPAIRS 27- 4248 - 663 -66 65246 3411 i I 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 248Q09 08/29/89 QUICK SERV BATTERY FILTER 248Q20 08/28/89 248Q20 08/28/89 248Q20 08/28/89 248Q20 08/28/89 REM SUPPLIES SAFETY GLOVES 248Q22 08/28/89 * * * * ** INSTALLATION 248R22 08/28/89 * * * * ** 248R25 08/28/89 * * * * ** HARDWARE 248R53 08/29/89 * * * * ** GENERAL SUPPLIES 248R81 08/23/89 * * * * ** 248503 08/23/89 248S03 08/28/89 * * * * ** 248510 08/28/89 * * * * ** 248S15 08/29/89 * * * * ** 248519 08/23/89 AMOUNT 145.00 187.50 115.26 40.32 156.28 68.88 380.74 182.09 182.09 218.00 218.00 103.70 103.70 2,624.00 2,624.00 102.27 102.27 86.82 66.66, 153.48 * 29.94 29.94 * 34.16 34.16 * 178.56 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION QUALITY REFRIG SERV CONTRACT QUICK SERV BATTERY FILTER QUICK SERV BATTERY FILTERS QUICK SERV BATTERY FILTERS QUICK SERV BATTERY FILTERS QUIK PRINT PRINTING REM SUPPLIES SAFETY GLOVES RENTAL EQUIP & SALES REPAlRs ROBERT B. HILL INSTALLATION RUBENSTEIN & ZIFF COST /GOODS SOLD S.T. ROBB BOLTS S.T. ROBB HARDWARE SUBURBAN TIRE & AUTO TIRES SEARS GENERAL SUPPLIES SEELYE PLASTICS PUC FITTINGS 09 -05 -89 PAGE 20 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 27- 4288 - 663 -66 104716 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 32521 3040 10- 4540- 560 -56 32151 2743 10- 4540 - 560 -56 32269 2743 10- 4540 - 560 -56 32270 2841 p. * ** -CKS' a 27- 4600 - 661 -66 17099 3171 * ** -CKS 10- 4642 - 301 -30 72889 3272 * ** -CKS 10- 4248 - 644 -64 10080 2895 * ** -CKS 27- 1332 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS 23- 4624 - 613 -61 143052 2783 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 646 -64 50765 2894 10- 4540 - 646 -64 50867 3042 * ** -CKS 10- 4610 - 560 -56 57396 2923 * ** -CKS , 30- 4504 - 782 -78 2724 * ** -CKS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 149208 2930 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE * * * * ** 248S27 08/23/89 248S27 08/28/89 248S27 08/23/89 248S27 08/23/89 * * * * ** 248S30 08/28/89 248S30 08/23/89 248S34 08/29/89 248S34 08/28/89 248S34 08/29/89 248S34 08/29/89 248534 08/29/89 248S34 08/29/89 248S34 08/29/89 248S34 08/29/89 248S34 08/29/89 248S34 08/29/89 248S34 08/29/89 248S35 08/23/89 * * * * ** 248556 08/29/89 * * * * ** 248S67 08/23/89 * * * * ** 248S72 08/28/89 248S72 08/28/89 248572 08/28/89 248S73 08/29/89 . 248S73 08/29/89 248S73 08/29/89 AMOUNT 178.56 28.20 95.02 28.20 87.07 238.49 435.58 180.00 615.58 11.45 155.29 102.96 155.29 340.31 125.36 24.26 40.17 41.39 5.51 4.12 1,006.11 * 35.95 35.95 * 20.32 20.32 3,125.00 3,125.00 67.00 27.00 39.90 133.90 300.95 300.95 300.95- 300.95 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION SHERWIN WILLIAMS SHERWIN WILLIAMS SHERWIN WILLIAMS SHERWIN WILLIAMS SIGN CENTRAL SIGN CENTRAL SOUTHDALE FORD SOUTHDALE FORD SOUTHDALE FORD SOUTHDALE FORD SOUTHDALE FORD SOUTHDALE FORD SOUTHDALE FORD SOUTHDALE FORD SOUTHDALE FORD SOUTHDALE FORD SOUTHDALE FORD SOUTHERN VACUUM STARK ELECTRONICS STORE FRONT STREICHERS STREICHERS STREICHERS STRGAR - ROSCOE -FAUSH STRGAR - ROSCOE -FAUSH STRGAR - ROSCOE -FAUSH PAINT PAINT PAINT PAINT GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS HUB ASSY REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR- PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS VACUUM REPAIR WIRE STRIPPING HUMAN SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES AMMUNITION PRO SERV ENG SERV ENG SERV 09 -05 -89 PAGE 21 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 40- 4542 - 801 -80 44095 3188 40- 4542 - 802 -80 2708 40- 4544 - 801 -80 135949 2457 40- 4544 - 801 -80 39947 2457 N: cz * ** -CKS 30- 4504 - 782 -78 64048 3340 30- 4504 - 782 -78 64036 3316 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 216124 10- 4540 - 560 -56 213980 10- 4540 - 560 -56 216432 10- 4540 - 560 -56 216245 10- 4540 - 560 -56 214629 10- 4540 - 560 -56 216183 10- 4540 - 560 -56 216013 10- 4540 - 560 -56 216305 10- 4540 - 560 -56 215072 10- 4540 - 560 -56 215104 10- 4540 - 560 -56 215303 50- 4236 - 861 -86 i * ** -CKS 40- 4540 - 806 -80 531610 3104 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 504 -50 112309 * ** -CKS 10- 4504- 420 -42 M63630 10- 4504 - 430 -42 M63400 10- 4572- 420 -42 M63505 10- 4201 - 260 -26 40- 4201 - 260 -26 40- 4201 - 260 -26 N: 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE * * * * ** 248S77 08/28/89 248S77 08/29/89 248S77 08/29/89 248S77 08/29/89 248S77 08/29/89 248577 08/29/89. 248S77 08/29/89 248S77 08/29/89 248S77 08/29/89 248S77 08/29/89 248S77 08/29/89 248S77 08/29/89 248S77 08/29/89 248578 08/29/89 248S78 08/28/89 248S78 08/28/89 248S78 :08/23/89 248S78 08/29/89 248S78 08/23/89 248S78 08/28/89 * * * * ** 248583 08/28/89 * * * * ** 248592 08/23/89 * * * * ** 248596 08/29/89 248597 08/29/89 * * * * ** 248T20 08/29/89 * * * * ** 24BT40 08/28/89 248T40 08/28/89 248T40 08/28/89 AMOUNT 2,053.86 118.99 108.56 3.90 35.44 49.20 43.31 85.50 60.57 4.65 244.00 7.80 20.47 2,836.25 72.41 119.03 49.86 6 143 120.176 47 135 36 126 452110 6!89 6!89 63!71 63!71 80.00 80!00 927129 927!29 553.20 553!20 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP SUPERAMERICA SYSTEM SUPPLY SCHUENEMAN -AMY SEH THE PRINT SHOP 28!60 TOLL COMPANY 11!70 TOLL COMPANY 115!22 TOLL COMPANY BODY REPAIR CONTRACTED REPAIRS SERV WORK PLATE MIRROR HAUDLES REPAIR PARTS SPEEDO EX PIPE GASKET PLATE CONVERTOR RESERVOIR AIR VALVE HARDWARE REPAIRS REPAIRS CEMENT PIPE PARTS COPPER T_UMING IRRIGATION PARTS GASOLINE COMPUTER SUPPLIES CLEANING PRO SESRV ENG NEWSLETTER REPARS REPAIR GAS SUPPLYS 09 -05 -89 PAGE 22 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE *x* -CKS 10- 4248- 560 -56 5842 2687 10- 4248 - 560 -56 87458 10- 4248 - 560 -56 88313 10- 4540 - 560 -56 112346 10- 4540 - 560 -56 112581 10- 4540 - 560 -56 112432 10- 4540 - 560 -56 112360 10- 4540 - 560 -56 112254 10- 4540 - 560 -56 113007 10- 4540 - 560 -56 112634 10- 4540 - 560 -56 112443 10- 4540 - 560 -56 112831 10- 4540- 560 -56 112684 10- 4540 - 540 -54 3016 26- 4248 - 682 -68 3050 26- 4248 - 682 -68 3014 40- 4504 - 803 -80 2859 40- 4540- 802 -80 3043 40- 4540 - 803 -80 3097 60- 1300 - 005 -20 3112 * ** -CKS 10- 4612 - 560 -56 * ** -CKS 10- 4233 - 560 -56 080552 3218 x ** -CKS 27- 4201 - 662 -66 40- 4201 - 800 -80 5115 * ** -CKS 10- 4600 - 628 -62 11128 3228 * ** -CKS 10- 4248 - 646 -64 901769 2956 10 -4248- 646 -64 030906 2956 10- 4610 - 560 - 56,238767 2769 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 09 -05 -89 PAGE 23 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 248T40 08/28/89 63.53 TOLL COMPANY. WELD TANKS 10- 4610 - 560 -56 466783 3204 248T40 08/23/89 18.45 TOLL COMPANY ACETYLENE 27- 4580 - 664 -66 31026 3073 237.50 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 248T66 08/23/89 1,823.26 TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT PLAYGROUND SUP 10- 4504 - 624 -62 331034 1496 1,823.26 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 248T68 08/23/89 120.73 TRIO SUPPLY CO MIX 50- 4632 - 862 -86 81367 120.73 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 24BT74 08/28/89 252.00 TURF SUPPLY CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 664 -66 027298 3297 252.00 * * * * ** *. ** -CKS 248U14 08/29/89 162.56 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP ELEC PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 3004 162.56 248V15 08/23/89 5.86 VAN PAPER CO. 4 OZ CONE CUPS 10- 4514 - 520 -52 270229 3078 248V15 08/29/89 1,310.00 VAN PAPER CO. CUPS 27- 4504 - 663 -66 262728 2974 248V15 08/23/89 1,242.00 VAN PAPER CO. BAGS 50- 4514- 822 -82 264668 2534 248V15 08/23/89 1,239.91 VAN PAPER CO. BAGS 50- 4514 - 842 -84 2534 248V15 08/23/89 646.00 VAN PAPER CO. BAGS 50- 4514 - 862 -86 2534 4,443.77 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 248V43 08/23/89 250.00 VERSATILE VEHICLE. RENTAL 27- 4276 - 665 -66 3560 3216 248V43 08/23/89 750.00 VERSATILE VEHICLE LEASE GOLF CARTS 27- 4276 - 665 -66 3559 2014 1,000.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 248V46 08/23/89 1,068.49 VESSCO PARTS 40- 4540 - 805 -80 6039 1299 248V46 08/28/89 93.08 VESSCO PARTS 40- 4540 - 805 -80 6554 1299 1,161.57 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 248W08 08/29/89 27.50 W.W. GRAINGER_ REEL 10- 4540- 440 -44 3021 248W08 08/29/89 50.74 W.W. GRAINGER FAN 10- 4540- 540 -54 3038 248W08 08/29/89 29.61 W.W. GRAINGER FIXTURES 10- 4540 - 646 -64 3189 248W08 08/23/89 275.69 W.W. GRAINGER TOOL CHEST 40- 4274 - 803 -80 2707 248W08 08/29/89 50.28 W.W. GRAINGER ELEC PARTS 40- 4540 - 802 -80 3046 433.82 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 248W11 08/23/89 495.18 W. GORDON SMITH GAS 27- 4612 - 664 -66 1486 2796 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 248W11 08/2.3/89 248W11 08/23/89 248W11 08/23/89 * * * * ** COMMUNICATIONS 248W28 08/28/89 248W28 08/23/89 * * * * ** 26 248W66 08/29/89 248W66 08/29/89 * * * * ** GOLF COURSE FUND 248X05 08/28/89 * * * * ** RECREATION CENTER FUND 248Z01 08/28/89 * * * * ** GUN RANGE FUND 248Z05 08/23/89 248Z05 08/23/89 * * * * ** 348W35 * * * * ** 08/29/89 17,550.76 1,117.15 9,868.05 254,553.23 5,188.71 557,115.69 l AMOUNT 10 495.18 GENERAL FUND 499.02 11 499.02 C.D.B.G. 1,988.40 12 415.00 418.72 COMMUNICATIONS 7.75 23 422.75* A- . A r 124.52 26 44.31 SWIMMING POOL FUND 168.83 27 163.66 GOLF COURSE FUND 163.66 28 82.50 82.50 * 87.75 132.90 220.65 * 181.92 181.92 * 172,493.29 485.00 837.69 7,801.60 1,067.63 616 .29 4 -A r 5 8,42 .69 77,1148 --.60 656 69 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION W. GORDON SMITH GASOLINE W. GORDON SMITH GAS W. GORDON SMITH GS WATER PRODUCTS WATER PRODUCTS WILLIAMS STEEL WILLIAMS STEEL XEROX CORP. REPAIR CLAMPS FITTINGS 'PAINT ,DRILL ASSY BUDGET SUPPLYS ZACKS IND CLEANING HAND SOAP ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE FIRST AID SUP ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE FIRST AID SUP WEIGLE -SUE MILEAGE FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND FUND 11 TOTAL C.D.B.G. FUND 12 TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER FUND 26 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUND FUND 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND FUND 30.TOTAL EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND FUND 41 TOTAL STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND FUND 60 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION FUND TOTAL 09 -05 -89 PAGE 24 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 27- 4612 - 664 -66 1485 2797 27- 4612 - 664 -66 42213 3174 27- 4612 - 664 -66 42172 3175 * ** -CKS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 99771 3132 40- 4540 - 812 -80 99436 3101 * *'* -CKS 10- 4504 - 301 -30 10- 4504 - 560 -56 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 160 -16 3329 27- 4504 - 664 -66 05495 3011 28- 4642 - 701 -70 540844 28- 4642 - 701 -70 540844 10- 4208 - 600 -60 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS