HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-09-18_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
SEPTEMBER 18, 1989
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
I. APPROVAL OF HRA MINUTES OF AUGUST 21, 1989 AND JOINT HRA /COUNCIL MINUTES OF
SEPTEMBER 5, 1989
II. UPDATE .- 50TH & FRANCE IMPROVEMENTS
III. ADJOURNMENT OF HRA
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *)
and in bold print are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one
motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Council
member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the
consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda.
* II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of Regular Meetings of August 21 and September 5, 1989 and
Joint HRA /Council Meeting of September 5, 1989.
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Analysis of Assessment by Manager or Engineer. Public comment heard. Action
of-Council by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall'vote of all members of the
Council required to pass.
A. Parking Ramp Improvement No. P -1B - West 51st Street Parking Ramp
B. Street Improvement No. BA -281A - Malibu Drive from Lincoln Drive to 710
feet Southeasterly
C. Watermain Improvement No. WM -363 - Malibu Drive from Lincoln Drive to 710
feet Southeasterly
D. Storm Sewer Improvement No. STS -185 - Malibu Drive from Lincoln Drive to _
290 feet Southwest
E. Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS -377 - Malibu Drive from Lincoln Drive to
710 feet Southeasterly
F. Watermain Improvement No. WM -364 - Ryan Avenue from West 62nd Street to
West 63rd Street
G. Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS -378 - Ryan Avenue from West 62nd Street
to West 63rd Street
H. Storm Sewer Improvement No. STS -186 - Minnesota Drive from France Avenue
to Edinborough Way
I. Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS -379 - Minnesota Drive from France Avenue
to Edinborough Way
J. Watermain Improvement No. WM -365 - Minnesota Drive from France Avenue to
Edinborough Way
K. Sanitary Sewer Connection No. HC -11 - 4540 France Avenue South
L. Maintenance Improvement No. M -89 - 50th Street and France Avenue Business
District
M. Tree Removal Improvement No. TR -89 - 5200 Valley View Road and 4,810
Brookside Avenue
N. Aquatic Weeds Improvement No. AQ -89 - Mill Pond and Indianhead Lake
0. Tree Trimming Improvement No. TT -89 - Southwest Quadrant of City
P. Re- assessment of Special Assessments on Tax Forfeited Land - Part of
Lot 23, Auditor's Subdivision No. 196
Agenda
Edina City Council
September 18, 1989
Page Two
w'
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing.
Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote
of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable
rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Final Development
Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/4 favorable rollcall vote
required to pass.
A. Conditional Use Permit - Building Expansion and Remodeling - Grace Church
of Edina, 5300 France Avenue (Contd from 8/21/89)
B. Proof of Parking_ Agreement - One Corporate Center Phase V and VI -
Generally located east of Ohms Lane and south of West 72nd Street
* C. Set Hearing Date (10/2/89)
1. Amendment to Final Development Plan, Edinborough - Hawthorn Edina,
Inc. Generally located north and east of Edinborough Way and west of
York Avenue
2. Amendment to Ordinance No. 825 - To Add a Hotel as a Permitted use in
the MDD -5 District
V. PUBLIC HEARING ON STREET VACATION Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation
by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If Council
wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required
to pass.
* A. Vacation of Scriver Road Right of Way - Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Hyland
Acres - (5101 Scriver Road)
VI. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
VII. AWARD OF BIDS
* A. Van Valkenburg Park Ballfield Lighting
* B. Boiler and Machinery Insurance
* C. Snow Plow and Wing for Loader
* D. Service Body for Electrical Service Truck
*
*
VIII. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Approval of Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of September 12, 1989
B. White Oaks Lots Status Report
G. Joint— Powers Agreement---Minnesota Drive
D. Decision on Berenberg Lawsuit
E. CDBG Third Party Funding Agreements
F. Travel Demand Management Ordinance Update
G. Animal Control Policy on Raccoons
H. Human Relations Commission - Ethnic Dinners
I. Appointment to C.A.S.H. Board
IX. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS
A. Ron Clark Letter - Single Family Moratorium
B. Petition for Permanent Street Surfacing and Curb - Lincoln Drive
X. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
XI. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda
' Edina City Council
September 18, 1989
Page Three
XII. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
XIII. FINANCE
A. Resolution Relating to General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds,
Series 1989; Authorizing the Issuance and Providing for the Public
Sale Thereof
* B. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 9/18/89: General Fund $955,506.81,
CDBG $5,678.41, Communications $2,214.90, Art Center $5,676.21, Capital
Fund $445.00, Swimming Pool Fund $520.57, Golf Course Fund $37,051.18,
Recreation Center Fund $9,479.23, Gun Range Fund $369.34, Edinborough Park
$10,247.83, Utility Fund $23,433.79, Liquor Dispensary Fund $129,919.60,
Construction Fund $704,023.79, $1,884,566.66 and confirmation of payment
payment of the following Claims dated 8- 31 -89: General Fund $162,488.57,
Communications $23.38, Art Center $1,054.49, Swimming Pool Fund
$12,523.23, Golf Course Fund $27,430.61, Recreation Center Fund $6,278.95,
Gun Range Fund $429.33, Edinborough Park $10,260.45, Utility Fund.
$43,419.60, Liquor Dispensary Fund $306,554.19, Total $570,462.80
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Mon Oct 2 Regular Council Meeting
Mon Oct 16 Council /Board of Appeals
Regular Council Meeting
Mon Nov 6 Regular Council Meeting
Mon Nov 20 Regular Council Meeting
7:00 p.m. Council Room
6:00 p.m. Mgrs Conf Room
7:00 p.m. Council Room
7:00 p.m. Council Room
7:00 p.m. Council Room
MINUTES
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
AUGUST 21, 1989
Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor
Richards.
MINUTES of the Joint HRA /Council Meeting of July 10, 1989 were approved as
submitted by motion of Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Kelly.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR CENTENNIAL LAKES CONDOMINIUMS LANDSCAPING Motion was made by
Commissioner Smith for award of bid for Centennial Lakes Condominiums Landscaping
to recommended second low bidder, Lakeland Nursery, at $155,932.05. Motion was
seconded by Commissioner Kelly.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR CENTENNIAL LAKES CONDOMINIUMS OUTDOOR LIGHTING & ELECTRICAL `YORK
Motion was made by Commissioner Smith for award of bid for Centennial Lakes
Condominiums outdoor lighting and electrical work to recommended low bidder,
Lakeland Nursery, at $52,590.00. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Rice.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, motion of Commissioner Smith
was seconded by Commissioner Paulus for adjournment. Motion carried.
Executive Director
MINUTES OF THE JOINT MEETING OF THE
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY /CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT EDINA CITY HALL
SEPTEMBER 5, 1989
A joint meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the City
Council was convened to consider concurrently: 1) Edina Homestead Development /RPI
Services, 3) Award of Bids - Centennial Lakes Phase I Residential Amenities, and
4) Centennial Lakes Phase IV. Action was taken by the HRA and Council as
recorded.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners /Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith
and Richards.
MINUTES of the HRA of July 24, 1989 and the Joint HRA /Council Meeting of August 7,
1989 were approved as submitted by motion of Commissioner/Member.Paulus, seconded
by Commissioner/Member Smith.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARING ON EDINA HOMESTEAD DEVELOPMENT - RPI SERVICES CONTINUED
INDEFINITELY Motion of Commissioner/Member Rice was seconded by
Commissioner/Member Smith to continue indefinitely the public hearing on the Edina
Homestead Development.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR CENTENNIAL LAKES - PHASE I RESIDENTIAL AMENITIES Executive
Director Gordon Hughes explained that the bids are for the construction of
fountains in the common areas of Centennial Lakes Condominiums -. Phase I and was
bid separately from some of the other amenities. Motion was made by Commissioner
Rice for award of bid for construction of fountains in the common areas of
Centennial Lakes Condominiums - Phase I to recommended low bidder, Monette
Construction, at $15,600.00. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Smith.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice,--Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
CENTENNIAL LAKES - PHASE IV DISCUSSED Executive Director Hughes said that he had
asked Larry Laukka, the Centennial Lakes Condominium developer, to appear and
discuss further his plans for the Phase IV 'Condominiums. He recalled that the HRA
gave this concept approval at their July 10, 1989 meeting. This concept would
make Phase IV a totally market rate building containing 30 units instead of the 46
units as in Phases I and II. The HRA would make its normal contribution to Phase
IV but none of the units would qualify for second mortgage assistance. Instead
the unused second mortgage potential would be transferred to other condominium
phases that would be eligible for purchase by moderate income individuals.
After the meeting, staff was concerned that the HRA had not given approval for
that unrecoverable subsidy portion of the HRA assistance. Director Hughes
mentioned that in Phases I, II and III, as well as in Edinborough, the HRA
provided an unrecoverable subsidy of $650,000 per phase which was used to reduce
the selling prices of the units. In Phase IV, Laukka Development is suggesting
that the unrecoverable subsidy be reduced from $650,000 to $250,000. This equates
approximately to the land cost for the Phase IV site so in essence the HRA would
be transferring the land at no cost to construct the project.
Director Hughes said that the question for the HRA is: Should Phase IV, which is
designed for more affluent purchases, be subsidized by the HRA so as to reduce the
selling prices? He referred to his memorandum dated September 1, 1989, addressed
to the HRA which listed several pros and cons for the proposed Phase IV.
a�
Commissioner Paulus asked if this would affect future developments in that other
developers would be asking the HRA to underwrite other projects. Director Hughes
said possibly there could be others redeveloping in the City but that a more
likely event would be if market rate housing was proposed for other phases within
Centennial Lakes. The same level of write down could be requested. Commissioner
Paulus noted that future requests will have to be considered on their merits by
the HRA.
Larry Laukka, Centennial Lakes condominium developer, informed the HRA that they
have prepared a packet for the proposed Phase IV and have forwarded it to a number
of people who have exhibited an interest. They are now in the process of
contracting with those people, subject to a pre -sale requirement that, as
developer, they have until October 1 to determine if the building is feasible. He
reiterated that the building design for the larger units would be within the
existing footprint and that the exterior would look the same as those of the
earlier phases. He said the intent is to see if they can introduce the larger
market rate units at that density (40 units per acre) to that community.
Mr. Laukka said that this would also provide an opportunity to construct one of
the buildings without any of the second mortgage subsidy which can then be put
back into the pool and be spread out over the balance of the development or be
saved for subsequent phases of Centennial Lakes. He said he had suggested that
the typical unrecoverable write down be reduced from $650,000 to $250,000 because
he felt the cost per unit would exceed what most people would be willing to pay at
that density and in that environment. He said in projecting cost it is about
$113 /square foot in the market place. .
In conclusion, Mr. Laukka said it is not certain that they will go forward with
Phase IV as proposed. Nevertheless, the formula has been structured with the
$250,000 write -down and that he wanted to be sure that was understood before
getting further into the project.
Chairman Richards said he was troubled by the $8,000 write -down per unit and the
fact that someone may easily be able to afford to pay that. He asked for a feel
of ranges of income and /or assets of individuals who had expressed interest.
In response, Mr. Laukka said that would be hard to even guess at but that the
names would be recognized as pillars of the community. A good number are retirees
or people who are about to retire and want to sell or have sold their homes but
wish to maintain residence in Edina. They have indicated that this project would
provide them that opportunity. Incomes and ages will range widely and the
majority of them are from Edina. Mr. Laukka said when they finished up the
product that, in trying to squeeze the design into the building, the question was
whether or not it could provide a value. The early response in the past two weeks
is that it has not. He said their plan is to offer the units for another three
weeks and then make a decision. If it does not sell then they would revert back
to a normal building for Phase IV wherein they would use the normal full subsidy
and normal write -down.
Mr. Laukka stated that he had felt that this was an opportunity to bring a new
element into the development and preserve something in excess of $600- 700,000
worth of write -down that could be put into the other units to deepen the subsidy
in the other areas. He said there was no harm done at this point and it is a
question of whether the HRA thinks it is a smart idea to try to do it and move
some of the write -down money around and broaden the capital pool.
Commissioner Rice asked what percentage of the buyers in Edinborough participated
in the second mortgage money. Mr. Laukka said that the maximum was 60 %. Member
Rice then asked, in his experience in building hundreds of units in various
communities, if it was a positive or negative to have various.income levels and
sociological levels in a neighborhood. Mr. Laukka replied that he felt it was
very positive. He said that after now managing the Edinborough project since its
inception and in' dealing with the homeowners' association they have found that the
older and more experienced people bring a certain amount of sophistication and
sobriety to the development. A lot of those were energetically involved in
running that community. The younger people are first time homeowners and are not
as experienced and they look and deal with their elder neighbors with a certain
amount of satisfaction because of their wisdom.
Commissioner Rice asked how the marketing of Phases I, II and III has gone in
comparison with Edinborough. Mr. Laukka said it has gone fairly well. At this
point with 134 homes there are 88 bonafide contracts that had people who were
qualified to purchase which is about as good or better than this stage with
Edinborough. He said they do not as yet have the models open but will have in
October. The market is almost identical to that of Edinborough - they are seeing
the same mix - younger faces, incomes, working women and empty nesters. He noted
that there are some higher priced units in Centennial Lakes, up to $110,000, which
have not sold as yet.
Chairman Richards asked if the $400,000 write -down not used for Phase IV were put
in Phase V, in addition to the normal $650,000, would that mean we could try to
reach the lower end of the spectrum. Mr. Laukka said they could deepen the second
mortgage program which would provide some flexibility. A larger second mortgage
would provide an opportunity to sell homes to people who earn less, possibly in
the $25- 26,000 income range.
Chairman Richards asked Mr. Laukka what additional hard costs he would incur in
the next three weeks. Mr. Laukka said that they have spent the money, designed
the building and that is speculative - there would be no additional costs. He
said he did not want to prolong the prospective project if it is not feasible.
Rather they would want to get on with the regular market and get building IV
started yet this year. Chairman Richards then asked what the reaction would be if
the HRA said no to the project three weeks from now. Mr. Laukka replied that he
would prefer the HRA to say no now. They do not wish to antagonize anyone and are
spending a lot of time and energy on this marketing.
Concerning marketing, Commissioner Smith asked if having a second mortgage
available would help. Mr. Laukka said he did not think so. The decision people
are making when they buy is if there is value - are they getting space for the -
dollar and can they live in that environment; the real question is the density.
Chairman Richards then asked the Commissioners to express their feelings on the
Phase IV as proposed. He said he would be inclined to allow the $250,000
write -down and that the other $400,000 be used in the other phases to try to
attract the other end of the economic spectrum as a compensating balance.
Commissioner Rice said he would concur with Chairman Richards. Commissioner Kelly
said that she would like to see this project happen and would like to see what
would happen in the next three weeks. She said that one of her concerns would be
the resale value for these units. Commissioner Smith said he would go along with
the proposal as presented. Commissioner Paulus said that she, too, would concur.
Chairman Richards then made a motion to approve conceptually a market rate
development for Phase IV Centennial Lakes Condominiums consisting of 30 units for
which the HRA would grant an unrecoverable subsidy not to exceed $250,000, with
the remaining subsidy to be transferred to other phases. Motion was seconded by
Commissioner Smith.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
1
Y.
Notion was made by Commissioner Smith and was seconded by Commissioner Bice for
adjournment of the BRA. Motion.carried unanimously.
Executive Director
City Clerk
n
Ar'L
� �1
ch
1BBB
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: City Council /HRA
From: Gordon Hughes, Exec.
Director - HRA
Francis Hoffman,
City Engineer
Date: 18 September, 1989
Subject: Tile Replacement
50th & France
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # -L-
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends [E
To HRA
0
To Council
Action ❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
To move forward with construction of replacing existing tiles with concrete
paver bricks set on a concrete base tied to existing concrete with rebars.
Info /Background:
City staff has completed a survey after installation of test sections of
different potential types of material for the 50th & France renovation.
Attached is the survey 'and comments made by property owners /or.tennants.
Additionally, we had BRW staff evaluate the different installations. The
test sections are located on the south side of the Edina Theatre.
The Association Board of Directors at 50th & France have some of the same
differences of opinion as demonstrated in the survey and comments section.
There continues to be an underlying fear that any and all decorative products
will not hold up as long as plain concrete or exposed aggregate concrete.
This concern colors the opinions given by many of the respondents. Our staff
opinion is one (that agrees with 50th & France Association) that the original
installation did not provide the long term stability that the City had hoped
for.
L
Report /Recommendation
Tile Replacement
50th & France
Page Two
We believe the proposed solution that is recommended deals with all issues.
The recommended solution is to use:
(A) Concrete brick with beveled edges. (This is identified as Test
Section #1.)
(B) Brick placed on concrete base with sand between concrete and brick.
(C) Use "rebars" (tie -in steel bars-to existing concrete to prevent
differential settling).
(D) Then "Shot- blast" existing plain concrete to enhance i'ts appearance
after paver brick installation.
The main reason for the proposed solution is to prevent the need to remove all
existing sidewalk and tiles for a total reconstruction on the walking system
at 50th &.France.
ffl I I I till
BRW. INC. THRESHER SOUAHE 700 IHIHD STREEI SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS. MINNLSOIA 55415
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 30, 1989
TO Gordon Hughes and
Fran Hoffman
City of Edina
FROM: Arijs Pakalns, AIA, AICP
RE: 50th & France
Pavement Reconstruction
Alternative Evaluation
PLANNING
TRANSPORTATION
ENGINEERING
URBAN DESIGN
PHONE: 612/37&0700 FAX: 6121370.1378
This memorandum provides a comparative evaluation of the ten paving reconstruc-
tion alternatives under consideration for the 50th and France area. Four of the
alternatives, No. 1, 2, 4 and 10, were suggested for evaluation in the BRW
memorandum, dated July 3, 1989; the rest of the options have been provided by
others.
The alternatives will be evaluated in terms -of installation requirements, dura-
bility, maintenance issues, and appearance. Following are the ten alternatives
and comments regarding each alternative:
1. Red and orange pavers in a random.patter. Two types of installations are
included:
a. Pavers on a bituminous tack coat.
b. Pavers on a concrete grout setting bed.
Installation: Because of the varying sizes of panels, some pavers may have
to be saw -cut to fit the openings. The pavers on the bituminous tack coat
have not been installed properly and are not level with the adjoining
sidewalk. Care needs to be taken not to stain the pavers with cement when
installing them on a concrete grout setting bed. A third potential type
of installation not demonstrated in the sample panels is installing the
concrete pavers on a 1 -inch sand layer on top of a 2h to 3 -inch concrete
base. The pavers are set with a vibrator forcing up the.sand in the joints
and firmly locking the pavers in place. This installation method has the
advantages of easy replacement of any stained or damaged pavers, ability to
do corrective or repair work to utilities under the pavers, and potential
reuse of the pavers in case the area is ever redeveloped.
AN AFFILIATE OF THE BENNETT, RINGROSE. WOLSFELD. JARVIS. GARDNER. INC.. GROUP
DAVID J. BENNETT DONALD W. RINGROSE RICHARD P WOLSFELD PETER E. JARVIS LAWRENCE J. GARDNER THOMAS F CARROLL CRAIG A. AMUNDSEN DONALD E. HUNT
MARK G. SWENSON JOHN B. McNAMARA RICHARD 0. PILGRIM DALE N. BECKMANN DENNIS J. SUTLIFF JEFFREY L. BENSON RALPH C. BLUM DAVID L. GRAHAM
MINNEAPOLIS DENVER PHOENIX TUCSON ST. PETERSBURG
Gordon Hughes and Fran Hoffman
August 30, 1989
Page 2
Durability: The concrete pavers are the most durable of all the alter-
natives.
Maintenance: No maintenance required.
Appearance: This alternative most closely approximates the existing tile
paver system.
2. Brick pavers. (Same two alternative installations as in No. 1) .
Installation: Same comments as for Alternative 1, except the brick pavers
do not lend themselves to the third type of installation.
Durability: The brick pavers may chip more easily at the edges and may
break up with time.
Maintenance: Replacement of chipped or broken brick pavers.
Appearance: The bricks would give the panels a new look but the relatively
uniform coloring of the bricks could create a rather monotonous appearance.
3. Bomanite with a green - colored diagonal pattern simulating slate.
Installation: Care needs to be taken not to stain the adjoining concrete
with the surface colorant.
Durability: The surface coloring can chip off exposing uncolored concrete
underneath and the concrete can spald and crack.
Maintenance: Difficult to repair or replace to match existing.
Appearance: Simulated materials very rarely achieve the look or feel of
the material being simulated. The greenish tone would give the.area an
undesirable "cool" look or appearance.
4. Brick-paver border with an exposed aggregate central panel.
Installation: Similar to Alternative 2.
Durability: Similar to Alternative 2.
Maintenance: Would require the upkeep and maintenance of two different
materials.
Appearance: The brick border would have a distinctive appearance in the
smaller panels but would lose its impact in the larger panels where the
exposed aggregate panels would dominate.
Gordon Hughes and Fran Hoffman
August 30, 1989
Page 3
5. Bomanite with a red - colored grid pattern and white grouted joints simula-
ting tiles.
Same comments as for Alternative No. 3 except that the grouted joints are
prone to failure and would need to be continuously repaired and.replaced.
Also, the patterns may not fit the openings, leaving sliver- shaped strips
at the edges.
6. Bomanite with a red - colored grid pattern.
Same comments as for Alternative No. 5 except that the rounded "cobble"
shapes are difficult to walk on and could cause tripping.
7. Bomanite with a red - colored, simulated brick pattern.
Same comments as for Alternative No. 3.
8. Bomanite with a green -black grid pattern.
Same comments as for Alternative No. 3 except that the dark -toned panels
would give the area an undesirable, somber look.
9. Bomanite with a black, simulated brick pattern.
Same comments as for-Alternative No. 3 except that the dark -toned panels
would give the area an undesirable, somber look.
10. Concrete pavers with a blended red -brown border, orange central panel, and _
orange corners. (Sample layout is located across driveway from other
panels.)
Same comments as for Alternative No. 1 except that the pattern would give
the panels a distinctive new look while providing continuity and interest.
Our recommendation is to use Alternative 10 because of its strength of
materials, durability, freedom from maintenance, and distinctive yet lively
appearance. We would also recommend that the pavers be installed using the
third installation method - -sand over a concrete base. If this alternative 1s
selected, a sample panel should be installed to verify the installation method
and the final appearance.
AP /lm
cc: File 62 -8928
50TH & FRANCE SURVEY RESULTS
PAURR N(1
ADDRESS
W. 49 1/2 Street
3918 - Patio Villa e
1
1 3
DIS
I61
IKES
5
ALL
6
AMPL
7
S
8
9
3918 - Patio Village
DISLIKES
ALL
SAMPL.S
3922 - Christian Science
3
2
1
3940 - Christ Lee & Sons
DIS
IKES
ALL
AMPL
S
W. 50th Street
3901 - World Gems
2
3
1
3901 - Korst Jewelers
1
3905 - House of Forrester
1
3
2
3907 - Tide pool Gallery
1
3
2
3908 - Bellesons
1
3
2
3910 - Bravo
1
3
2
3911 - Edina Cinemas
3
2
1
2
3917 - Beauty by Design
1
3922 - Edina Travel
1*
3922 - Hosmer A. Brow Atty.
2
3
1
3924 - TCF
3
1
2
3929 - Janele's
1
2
3933 - Children's General Store
3
1
2
3939 - Benson Premier Vision
1
3
2
3939 - Mary 0. Flynn, DDS
1
3
2
3939 - Maxims II
3
2
1
3939 - Dr. M. A. Ronald
1
2
3
3940 - Shoe Allee
1
2
3
3940 - RSVP
1
2
3
3940 - B erl s Edina Gallery
1
2
3
3943 - Edina Liquor
1
2
3
3945 - 50th St. Associates
DISLIKES
ALL
AMPUIS
3945 - Lund Agency
DISLIKES
ALL
AMPL
S
3945 - Edina Properties
DISLIKES
ALL
AMPL
S
3945 - Lunds
DISLIKES
ALL
AMPUIS
France Avenue
4924 - The Sheridans Interiors
1
5000 - Fannie May
3
2
1
5014 - McMuffee's
DISLIKES
ALL
$AMPUIS
5024 - Edina Camera
3
1
2
5026 - Lo os of Edina
3
1
2
5030 - Edina Barber Shop
1
5034 - Lucille R. Smith Inc.
DIS
IKES
ALL
SAMPLES
5036 - Frank Kaiser
1
2
3
5036 - Merrill Lynch
1
2
3
Unknown
1
2
3
TOTAL 1ST CHOICE
11
0
8 1
4
2
3 1
0
1
1*
TOTAL 2ND CHOICE
2
4
0 1
5
5
4
1
2
3
TOTAL 3RD CHOICE
4
4
4
3
1
3
4
0
1
TOTAL # CHOICES
17
8
12
12 1
8 110
1
5 1
3 1
5
* With red brick color
COMMENTS - FRANCE AVENUE SURVEY
WEST 49 1/2 STREET
3918 Prefer to duplicate aggregate as we did on the Mpls. side - I feel
it is the most practical for both walking and maintenance.
3918 We don't like any of the samples. We prefer the aggregate, like
the Minneapolis side has. It would be much easier for public
maintenance and easier for women to walk on. The cutsey brick are
nice for home use or in a warmer climate, but not for here.
3922 With high heels I try to walk on concrete and avoid all bricks.
3940 I have practiced my profession for the past forty five years. I
have always operated on the principle, you make a mistake once but
gain knowledge from such error. From the attached letter from
your office, I take that you have not benefited from the mistake
your office made some fifteen years ago in regards to using tiles
on the sidewalks at Fiftieth and France. The following reasons
should guide you in not using tile. (1) They're slippery, (2) The
color fades and they look like hell, and (3) They come loose and
create a hazard. We have been a property owner for the past forty
years so therefore we feel we have the right to express our
opinion in regards to this problem. It is always our concern that
our tax money is not being wasted. Thanks.
WEST 50TH STREET
3901 ( #4) With larger pebble and simpler outer border - without points
on pavers.
3907 Skip the bricks - they fall apart and are slippery - need
something that will hold up during the winter months and that are
safe to use - without slipping.
3908 It is very difficult to choose from eye appeal alone!! Not
knowing costs, up -keep, and longest wearing qualities, etc., would
have helped to make a correct or better rating!!
3910 Women wearing heels would find some of these samples quite
troublesome when walking.
3911 Lets make sure it is strong. I fell through one of the old brick
sidewalks about 2 years ago - nearly broke my leg!
3917 The colored cement with cut in pattern makes more logical sense as
there would be less problem with grade and less problem with snow
removal'in winter.
3922 Considerations: Ease of walking on, low- maintenance, ease of snow
removal, durability, aesthetics. The individual brick design has
not worked, why even consider it again?
WEST 50TH STREET (Continued
3922 Has a sand base proved satisfactory? I think the stamped concrete
squares would be more difficult to shovel in winter and since the
space between the stamped squares are deeper than the laid
individual bricks they would be difficult for women with spiked
heels.
3929 We would suggest tiles that heels will not get caught in the
grout!! We are tired of having our shoes ruined.
3.933 4 is our choice by far. Are these bricks as fragile as the ones
on the sidewalk now?
3939 These choices seem to have the flattest surfaces (1,5 0). The
others might create problems for elderly or hi- heeled shoes.
3939 Use of cement in place of tiles altogether. Our general consensus
in the building is that although the the is more attractive, it
always becomes problematic as it breaks apart. All the seaming is
very damaging to shoes and hard for elderly walkers.
3939 I think gray tiles would be a nice change from regular red brick.
3940 I believe the "redder" colors are better - the dark tiles may
reflect more summer heat as well!
3945 It appears that all sample tiles are potentially hazardous to
pedestrian traffic due to their unevenness.
3945 Regular sidewalk - full width.
FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH
4924 We like this one (No. 1) because it looks natural and like real
brick. Also, we feel its consistent with the character of 50th &
France. Traditional and regional.
5000 I don't like the ones with the cracks in between the tiles, they
are likely to break up just like the ones we have already.
1,2,3,4,5 = are just like the ones we have now and you would spend
additional time repairing them.
5014 Actually I think you should put exposed aggregate w /red brick
bordering it.
5024 Make anything that's easy for snow shoveling.
5030 Most samples could be very slippery in winter, or will raise with
frost. Hard to shovel snow from. No. 1, if set in sand.
5034 Strongly dislike all samples. Understanding was walks would be
sections of exposed aggregate with cement borders - providing
something cost effective, level surface for ease of walking and
clearing snow - attractive if workmanship done better than that on
Mpls. side.
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
SEPTEMBER 5, 1989
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor
Richards.
YMCA YOUTH FITNESS 'WEEK PROCLAIMED Motion of Member Paulus was seconded by Member
Kelly for adoption of the following proclamation:
PROCLAMATION - YMCA YOUTH FITNESS WEEK
WHEREAS, The Metropolitan Minneapolis YMCA ( Southdale Branch) recognizes the need
for youth to develop a healthy life style and positive esteem; and
WHEREAS, There is a need for promoting youth fitness in a challenging yet
non - competitive environment; and
WHEREAS, The YMCA has identified a need for a special place that is safe and fun
for children and their parents to enhance their fitness level; and
WHEREAS, On September 9, 1989 the Minneapolis YMCA will open its Kid's Gym at the
Southdale, Northwest, and Ridgedale branches to meet these needs;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Frederick S. Richards, Mayor of the City of Edina, do hereby
proclaim the second week of September, 1989 to be
YMCA YOUTH FITNESS WEEK
in the City of Edina.
PROCLAIMED this 5th day of September, 1989.
Receiving the proclamation on behalf of the YMCA Southdale Branch was Marji
Miller, Membership /Marketing Director, who extended an invitation to attend their
open house on Saturday, September 9 from 11 a.m. to 2 p.m.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by
Member Kelly to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF JULY 24 AND AUGUST 7. 1989 APPROVED Motion
was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly to approve the Council
Minutes of the Regular Meetings of July 14 and August 7, 1989.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
DECISION OF BOARD OF APPEALS AFFIRMED: FENCE HEIGHT VARIANCE DENIED FOR 4114
MORNINGSIDE ROAD Planner Phil Dommer presented the appeal of John Kalachnik, 4114
Morningside Road, for a fence height variance. He stated that the subject
property is a corner lot at the intersection of Morningside Road and Grimes
Avenue. The homeowner has constructed a six foot fence in the front yard area
adjacent to the sidewalk. The height of fences permitted in this area is limited
to four feet.
Planner Dommer explained that the subject property is situated such that there is
very limited area on the lot which can be considered as private outdoor space.
The fence is.intended to provide privacy and security for the family. The lots to
the north face Grimes Avenue and the area fenced in is adjacent to the front yards
of these homes. The ordinance limiting fence height to four feet is designed to
preserve the streetscape of the homes to the north.
On August 17, 1989 the Board of Appeals reviewed the situation after reviewing
materials submitted and hearing testimony from the proponent, staff and the
neighbors. The Board unanimously voted to deny the request for the two foot fence
variance.
Member Paulus noted that the fence has been partially completed and asked how the
project got this far without the question of height being raised. Planner Dommer
AVW
said that Mr. Kalachnik has contacted the Building Department to check on fence
height but did not apply for a permit for the work on the deck and porch. The
City became aware of the project from neighborhood calls and complaints and was
able to stop the construction of the fence.
John Kalachnik, 4114 Morningside Road, said he had decided to appeal the decision
of the Board because he felt several factors were not considered: 1) The Board was
concerned that the character of the neighborhood would be effected. He explained
that all'but one area neighbor had signed a statement that they had no objection
to the six foot fence. Also, a number of houses in the immediate area have six
foot fences which are clearly visible from the street. 2) The Board was concerned
about the affect on the immediate neighbors. He said he had checked with both
neighbors and both said they had no concerns.
Mr. Kalachnik said he had started the project in April and his objective was to'
try to improve the property. He had first approached his neighbors and then had a
survey made. After that he came to City Hall and explained that he wanted to
build a six foot fence, showing a sketch for the location of the proposed fence.
He said he was assured that he was doing the right thing and that there was no
problem. He then proceeded to start the work on the fence at the'six foot level.
A complaint was then made to the City which he assumed concerned the clear view
area. Mr. Kalachnik said that he did not want to have any safety concerns and
that in working with Mr. Dommer he immediately took the fence down until the issue
could be resolved. In the revised plan he said there will be a 30 foot clear view
setback according to ordinance requirements. Mr. Kalachnik said that in order to
meet ordinance requirements the converting of the fence from six feet to four feet
will cost an additional $1,000 which will impose an additional hardship.
John Peterson, 4239 Grimes Avenue, said his only concern about the fence was the
Grimes Avenue side and the fact that there would be no place for snow storage
because the fence is up against the sidewalk.
Member Smith made a motion to affirm the decision of the Board of Appeals and to
deny the request for a two foot fence height variance to permit a six foot fence
in -the front setback area. Motion was seconded by Member Rice.
Member Paulus said she had a problem in denying the variance request because the
homeowner did talk to the Building Department and built the fence with the
understanding that it met ordinance requirements. Further, the homeowner has
tried to remedy the situation by moving the fence back to provide for a clear view
area. Member Smith commented that he could share that concern but that he could
not agree with granting variances in the community based on how well our staff did
or did not do in communicating.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Rice, Smith
Nays: Paulus, Richards
Variance denied.
*HEARING DATE OF 10/2/89 SET FOR AMENDMENTS TO SUBDIVISION AND ZONING ORDINANCES
Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly setting October
2, 1989 as hearing date for amendments to the Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF COUNTRYSIDE PARR BASKETBALL COURTS Motion was
made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for
reconstruction of Countryside Park basketball courts to recommended low bidder,
Finley Brothers Enterprises, at $6,640.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
R
REPORT GIVEN ON STATUS OF WHITE OARS LOTS Assistant Manger Gordon Hughes made
reference to a letter dated August 30, 1989 that was sent to Richard J. Andron
concerning Lot 9, White Oaks Second Addition and Lot 1, White Oaks Third Addition.
As directed by the Council, the letter contained an cash offer of $32,000 for the
subject lots, subject to: 1) The City must receive prior to closing $16,000 from
the White Oaks Improvement Association, and 2) The City would accept and
acknowledge receipt of a gift of approximately $120,000 in recognition of the
market value of the subject lots. Assistant Manager Hughes said that he had hoped
to have a response from Mr. Andron but had not been contacted by Mr. Andron prior
to this meeting.
Mayor Richards asked if staff has communicated the terms of the offer to the White
Oaks Improvement Association so that they understand the Council's position and
what is expected of the Association. Connor Schmid, representing the Association,
said that that has been made clear and that the response the Association makes
would meet the requirements of the City if this goes forward.
REPORT PRESENTED ON GRANDVIEW CEMETERY Manager Rosland referred to a memorandum
dated September 5, 1989 from David Velde, Sanitarian, concerning the nuisance
created by Grandview Cemetery for adjacent homeowners. The operator of the
cemetery, Harry Lindberry, has been excavating materials from the property,
hauling in fill, and operating a commercial trucking firm and handling various
materials on the site. In addition, unused or discarded equipment and material
have been allowed to accumulate.
Staff has met with the neighbors and discussed the problem and actions the City
could take to, hopefully, resolve the nuisance. The neighbors agree that the
operation of a cemetery on the property would be acceptable; the trucking
enterprise and excavating operations are not acceptable to them. They understand
that some earth moving activities will be occurring to grade the remaining land
for cemetery use.
The City can issue orders to Mr. Lindberry to abate the following nuisances: 1)
Tall and noxious weeds, 2) Accumulation of discarded tires, 3) Accumulation of
discarded or unused machinery and equipment, and 4) Failure to control fugitive
dust. The City also, based on the Zoning Ordinance, may be able to stop the
excavating operation or at least require such things as fencing and a grading
plan, and may be able to stop the truck storage and excavating operations.
If successful, these actions would relieve some of the nuisances and would stop
the commercial trucking and excavating which has been occurring on the site.
Staff would recommend that the following action be taken to bring about a long
term solution to the Grandview Cemetery problem:
Initiate action to attempt to stop the commercial trucking and mining
operations on the site.
Issue orders to attempt to abate the existing nuisances on the site.
At a minimum, attempt to require a site grading plan for development of the
property for cemetery use and set a date certain for completion of the site
grading and finishing.
Member Smith asked if staff had issued orders before concerning weeds, discarded
equipment and dust and also where the grading plan would fit. Sanitarian Velde
said that the City has not but that those are routine kinds of things that could
be done; however, the problem is deeper than the nuisance issues. Concerning the
grading plan, he explained that the way the vacant land is now Mr. Lindberry would
be unable to use it as a cemetery and that some grading would be required. The
proposed grading plan would set a specific date whereby the grading must be
completed. Member Smith asked if the City has ever taken prior action against Mr.
Lindberry. Sanitarian Velde said he was involved in the 1970's when a greenhouse
.F
on the property was'deemed an unsafe structure. It took several months to have
that removed but it was finally done.
Mayor Richards mentioned that litigation to at to stop the commercial
trucking and mining operations on the site would be costly and it is uncertain as
to whether.or not the City would be successful. He recalled that previous
litigation against Mr. Lindberry was unsuccessful. Mayor Richards asked if the
affected neighbors would be willing to participate in defraying part of the cost
if legal action were taken against Mr. Lindberry.
Robert Eaton, 419 Monroe Avenue, commented that no one is trying to force
Mr. Lindberry out of his legitimate cemetery business. Speaking for himself, he
said he would not want to spend a lot of time on lengthy litigation; that he felt
the nuisances should be stopped but that he did not know how to accomplish that.
He said that other means should be tried first before we jump into a lawsuit.
1
Mayor Richards asked if it would make sense for he and the City Manager to sit
down with Mr. Lindberry in a non - confrontation type of setting and discuss some of
the concerns that have been raised, if the other Council Members concurred with
that action. Mr. Eaton responded that he thought that would probably be the best
way to approach Mr. Lindberry.
Following more discussion, it was informally agreed by the Council that the Mayor
and Manager try to meet with Mr. Lindberry to discuss these issues and then report
back to the neighbors and the Council as to the outcome.
APPOINTMENT TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSED Mayor
Richards said that he was not prepared to submit a name for appointment to the
Community Development and Planning Commission to fill the vacancy caused by the
resignation of Del Johnson. He asked the Council Members to submit names of
individuals to be considered for the position so that the appointment could be
made by the first meeting in October.
Mayor Richards said that several suggestions have been made: 1) That, in order to
have balance on the Commission, the individual be someone who is not proactive in
the development sense but one with interest/background and experience in the
fields of real estate or development, and 2) That 11 members on the Commission
tends to be an unwieldy number.
Following discussion on the issue of how many members should be on the Commission,
Mayor Richards suggested that information on terms and number of years served for
current Commission members be placed in the next Council packets and that the
Council debate this issue to determine if the number of commissioners should be
reduced before considering filling the position vacated by Mr. Johnson.
*RESOLUTION ADOPTED APPROVING SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT FOR 1989 WITH
HENNEPIN COUNTY Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly
for adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that it hereby
approves•the Solid haste Management Agreement with Hennepin County (Contract
No. A07839) to provide partial funding (80 %) for Edina's recycling program and
$5.00 per container;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Council hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor
and Manager to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED APPROVING STORM SEWER PROJECTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS; BIDS TO BE
TAKEN Engineer Fran Hoffman stated that staff has reviewed all areas of the City
and the following projects have been determined to need additional stormwater
drainage upgrading:
Estimated Cost
A) STS -195 - Woodcrest Drive - from 56th & Woodcrest to $ 9,348.00
backyard of 5528 Woodcrest (pipe installation)
B) STS -196 - Grove Street - from easement west side of 27,656.00
5717 Grove Street to 145' east (enlarge pipe and
create overflow pipe)
C) STS -199 - 76th Street and Parklawn Avenue - West to 5,375.00
the pond (pipe upgrade)
D) STS -200 - South of West 58th Street - at Grimes $54,784.00
and Halifax area (pipe upgrade)
Staff has evaluated each area as a result of petitions of residents following the
July 1987 flooding. These projects are recommended and are part of the ongoing
upgrading of the storm sewer system. The funds for the projects will be from the
stormwater utility fund. Bids for the projects would be taken with a completion
date in early spring of 1990.
Member Smith moved adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEM ENT S.AND
DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR
STORM SERER IMPROVEMENT NOS. STS -195, STS -196, STS -199 AND STS -200
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA:
1. The plans and specifications for the proposed improvements set forth in the
following Advertisement for Bids form, heretofore prepared by the City Engineer
and now on file in the office of the City Clerk are hereby approved.
2. The Clerk shall cause to be published in the Edina Sun - Current and
Construction Bulletin the following notice of bids for improvements:
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
STORM SEWERS
CONTRACT NO. 89 -14 (ENG)
IMPROVEMENT NOS. STS-195, STS -196, STS -199 & STS -200
BIDS CLOSE SEPTEMBER 21, 1989
SEALED BIDS will be received and opened in the Council Chambers in Edina City
Hall, 4801 West 50th Street at 11:00 A.M., Thursday, September 21, 1989. The
Edina City Council will meet at 7:00 P.M., Monday, October 2, 1989 to consider
said bids. The following are approximate major quantities:
1,102 LF RCP 12 " -27"
279 LF 12" PVC Cl. 40
9 EA Manholes, Catch Basins
112 TONS MN /DOT 2341 Bituminous
413 TONS C1: 5A Gravel
1,700 SY Sod
20 LF 72" C.M.P.
15 HR 2 CY Backhoe Time
Bids shall be in a sealed envelope with a statement thereon showing the work
covered by the bid. Bids should be addressed to the City Engineer, City of Edina,
4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424, and may be mailed or submitted
personally to the City Engineer. Bids received by the City Engineer, either
through the mail or by personal submission, after the time set for receiving them
may., -be returned unopened.
Work must be done as described in plans and specifications on file in the office
of the City Clerk. Plans and specifications are available for a deposit of $25.00
(by check). Said deposit to be returned upon return of the plans and
specifications with a bona fide bid. No bids will be considered unless sealed and
accompanied by bid bond or certified check payable to the City of Edina in the
amount of at least ten (10) percent of all bids. All plans mailed, enclose
separate check for $5.00 payable to the City of Edina for postage and handling.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL.
Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith,.Richards
Resolution adopted.
*HEARING DATE OF 10/2/89 SET FOR ON -SALE WINE LICENSE FEES Motion was made by
Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly setting October 2, 1989 as hearing
date to consider on -sale wine license fees.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED IN SUPPORT OF GLENN C.G. OLSON'S NOMINATION TO REGIONAL TRANSIT
COMMISSION Mayor Richards advised that he had been contacted by Glenn C.G. Olson
who is seeking support for his reappointment to the Regional Transit Commission as
at -large representative of the suburban communities in the metropolitan-area. His
resume indicated that he has been a long time member of the Metropolitan Transit
Commission and has held various positions in local government.
Member Rice commented that he knows Mr. Olson personally, having served on several
committees with him, and that he is conscientious, well informed and does his job.
Mayor Richards said that Mr. Olson had been told to seek support for his
reappointment and that he also was responding to what had happened when there was
no representation from the western suburbs appointed to the Regional Transit
Board. For those reasons, Mayor Richards said he would support his nomination.
Member Kelly moved adoption of the following resolution to be sent to the Regional
Transit Board:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the term of Glenn G. C. Olson on the Metropolitan Transit Commission is
expiring, and
WHEREAS, he has demonstrated his ability to work in a public affairs environment
and has served as Vice Chair of the Metropolitan Transit Commission and as
Chairman of the Finance and Administration Committee, and
WHEREAS, he has been a dedicated at -large representative of the suburban
communities in the metropolitan area;
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that it hereby
nominates Glenn G. C. Olson for reappointment;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Edina City Council urges the.Regional Transit
Board to approve the reappointment of Glenn G. C. Olson to the Metropolitan
Transit Commission.
ADOPTED this 5th day of September, 1989.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Resolution adopted. -
SHHSC REQUEST FOR FUNDING BEING REVIEWED Manager Rosland reported that he has
been meeting with Larry Oppold, Executive Director, South Hennepin Human Services
Council (SHHSC), concerning SHHSC'S request for funding from the.four cities for
1990 and had also had spent some time with the REM Corporation. SHHSC has reduced
its budget request and will be getting back to the four cities on this.
Member Kelly said she appreciated Manager Rosland's efforts in this and pointed
out that he had taken a leadership role for the four cities involved.
REPORT TO BE MADE ON MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION'S ACTIVITIES Mayor Richards
suggested that Manager Rosland give a report to the Council on the activities of
the Municipal Legislative Commission (MLC) at an upcoming Council meeting, with
the possibility of hearing also from Bob Renner, Jr., lobbyist for the MLC. This
would enable the Council to evaluate how effective the MLC has been in
consideration of the membership fee paid.
WATER BILL INCREASE QUESTIONED Member Rice commented that the water bills have
increased and asked if there was any special reason for this. Engineer Fran
Hoffman said the current billings were for the summer quarter when water usage is
at its highest.
REPORT TO BE GIVEN ON RACCOONS Member Rice asked for information on the raccoon
situation in the City. Manager Rosland said a report would be upcoming in the
near future.
COMMENTS MADE ON FENCE VARIANCE AND CEMETERY PROBLEM Member Rice commented that
in connection with the fence variance request heard earlier in the meeting, he
felt that if incorrect information had been given by staff we should have some
means with which to rectify that. Concerning the discussion on Grandview
Cemetery, Member Rice said that if ordinances were being violated, e.g. noxious
weeds, tires, etc., that the City should either prosecute or change the ordinances
regardless of who commits the violation.
CONCERN OF RESIDENT ON RED FOX LANE NOTED Member Kelly reported that she had
received a call from a resident on Red Fox Lane concerning construction on their
street which had occurred while they were out of town. She suggested that staff
should advise residents of the'date when such work is to,be done so that they
would not be surprised. Engineer Hoffman said that staff does work with residents
in the field and that normally such notice is given.
BORDONARO LETTER CONCERNING RECYCLING NOTED Member Paulus asked that the Council
Members be provided with copies of a letter dated August 31, 1989 that she had
received from Jan Bordonaro, 6009 Birchcrest Drive, concerning the City's
recycling program in which the suggestion was made that that recyclables should be
picked up at the curb in order to reduce the cost of the program.
DORNBIASER LETTER REGARDING TREE PLANTING PROGRAM DISCUSSED Member Paulus
referred to a letter dated August 23, 1989 from Bright Dornblaser, 4630 Drexel
Avenue, asking the City Council to authorize a plan to replace missing boulevard
trees in the Country Club District. She asked what progress had been made on
developing a tree planting program. Manager Rosland responded that staff has
contacted some nurseries but that nothing definite has been developed. Member
Paulus suggested that a target date of February, 1990 be set for staff to bring a
recommendation to the Council.
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL REGIONAL BREAKFAST MEETING DISCIISSED Member Paulus asked if
the Metropolitan Council Regional Breakfast Meeting scheduled for September 22,
1989 for Hennepin County (South) would be worthwhile. Member Kelly said she felt
attending would be helpful and that she usually gained from hearing about the
issues that the Metropolitan Council is dealing with. Mayor Richards said it is
helpful to hear how they view some of those issues which is usually different from
how local officials view them.
EDINA SCHOOL BOARD'S LONG RANGE PLAN NOTED Member Paulus reported that the Edina
School Board together with 15 different representatives from_the community has
formed a committee to develop a 20 -year long range plan. She said that she is a
part of that and their first meeting is scheduled for September 20. She asked
that the Council Members contact her if they had anything to interject.
GIVENS LETTER REQUESTING SATELLITE ON EXECUTIVE GOLF COURSE DISTRIBUTED Mayor
Richards circulated a letter addressed to the Director Parks & Recreation dated
August 25, 1989 from Mary E. Givens, 6566 France Avenue So., about the possibility
of placing a satellite on the Executive Course. Director Bob Kojetin said they are
addressing that request.
COUNCIL STUDY SESSION SCHEDULED FOR 9/16189 CANCELLED Mayor Richards said that
only one subject has been suggested for the Council Study Session scheduled for
September 16 - Procedure for proponents /developers to communicate with neighbors
before a project is begun. He suggested that the Study Session be cancelled but
that the Council consider this issue in the near future. Manager Rosland said he
would work with staff to develop a process that they feel could be enforced and
bring that back to the Council for discussion.
RESPONSE REQUESTED FOR QUESTION ON 1990 TAXES Mayor Richards said that he has
been asked by residents what to expect in 1990 concerning real estate taxes. He
asked Assessor Johnson for a response to the question that could be relayed to the
citizens.
PROPOSAL OF SOUTHDALE MANAGEMENT FOR FULLTIME POLICE OFFICER PRESENTED Manager
Rosland reported that he had met with the Southdale Center management who are
concerned about the great amount of shrinkage they are experiencing. They are
willing to pay the total cost for a fulltime police officer that would be
stationed at Southdale Center. He suggested that an agreement be drafted for this
proposal, with a condition that it could be phased out if not necessary.
Manager Rosland recalled that in the early 1970's Southdale had a similar concern
and that the City then did have a Commercial Area Patrol for that part of the.
City. Subsequently, because of budget restraints this was discontinued. He said
the proposal would also benefit the Police Department in that it would provide an
opportunity to rotate officers and assign them to non - patrol car duty. It would
also release the patrol officers from some of the responses they now make to
Southdale. When the south portion of Centennial Lakes is fully developed, the
recommendation at that time would probably be to fund an additional police officer
through the trust fund established by the Centennial Lakes development. Manager
Rosland said that he did not want to pursue this until he had the Council's
reaction. He said he felt that in this way the private sector is responding to
the City's tax problems.
Following some discussion and questions concerning the proposal, Mayor Richards
said that this would be a major policy issue and that the Council would need to be
provided with information as to the pros and cons on the issue and then think
about the ramifications City -wide before making a decision. It was informally
agreed that staff be directed to develop data on the proposal and bring that back
for consideration by the Council.
MANAGEMENT SUMMARY ON ENTERPRISE FUNDS REVIEWED Manager Rosland presented an
executive summary'of the City's enterprise funds for year to date - July, showing
an increase /decrease comparison between years 1988 and 1989. The figures include
revenues, expenditures, depreciation expense and bond payments. He noted that
there is an increase in the net loss over last year for the Arena which was
anticipated because of the bond payments. Those payments are being made from the
proceeds of the golf dome and golf course which are shown as one entity. Also,
Edinborough Park has reduced its net loss by some $144,201 over last year at this
time. He pointed out that the liquor stores have made a substantial increase in
net income over 1988.
General discussion was held on how depreciation is determined, the impact on the
formula for raising general revenue, how enterprise fund losses are funded and the
overall increase in income on the various funds.
It was informally agreed that this format for the executive summary on the
enterprise funds was good. The Council concluded that a quarterly report would be
sufficient and asked that the report include a percentage figure for increase or
decrease for each fund, together with a written explanation on the variances.
*HEARING DATES OF 1012189 AND 10/16/89 SET FOR 1990 BUDGET Notion was made by
Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly setting hearing date on the 1990
Budget and taxes payable in 1990 for October 2, 1989 and reconvening the hearing
on October 16, 1989 if necessary.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*HEARING DATE OF OCTOBER 2. 1989 SET FOR ADVANCE REFUNDING OF 1985 TAX INCREMENT
BONDS Notion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly setting
October 2, 1989 as hearing date for advance refunding of 1985 Tax Increment Bonds.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*CIAIMS PAID Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly to
approve payment of the following claims as per pre -list dated 9/5/89: General Fund
$172,493.29, C.D.B.G. $485.00, Communications $837.69, Art Center $7,801.60,
Swimming Pool Fund $1,067.63, Golf Course Fund $17,550.76, Recreation Center Fund
$1,117.15, Gun Range Fund $616.29, Edinborough Park $9,868.05, Utility Fund
$254,553.23, Storm Sewer Utility $8,421.69, Liquor Dispensary Fund $5,188.71,
Construction Fund $77,114.60, Total $557,115.69
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the
meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
City Clerk
ri
IC N[ITES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
AUGUST 21, 1989
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor
Richards.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by
Member Kelly to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*PUBLIC HEARING ON CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR GRACE CHURCH OF EDINA CONTINUED TO
9118/89 Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly to
continue the public hearing on the Conditional Use Permit for Grace Church of
Edina to September 18, 1989 as requested by the proponents.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
ORDINANCE NO. 1102 -A1 (SAC CHARGES PAID TO METROPOLITAN SEWER BOARD) ADOPTED:
SECOND READING WAIVED Finance Director John Wallin explained that this ordinance
amendment would update Ordinance No. 1102 to follow the revised Metropolitan Waste
Control Commission's reserve capacity charge policies. Also, it would tie the
fees that are to be passed through to the Commission to the City's fees and
charges ordinance.
Member Rice asked if staff concurred with the formula that the charge for each
apartment and condominium unit shall comprise 80% of a unit. Director Wallin said
that staff agrees with that charge. There was no further comment or objection
heard.
Member Smith introduced Ordinance No. 1102 -A1 and moved its adoption as follows,
with waiver of Second Reading:
ORDINANCE NO. 1102 -A1
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1102
TO CHANGE THE AMOUNT OF SAC CHARGES
PAID TO THE METROPOLITAN SEWER BOARD
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Paragraphs (a) and (b) of Section 2 of Ordinance No. 1102 are
hereby replaced in their entirety by the following new paragraphs:
(a) For the,purpose of paying the costs of reserve capacity allocated
to the City each year by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, there is
hereby established a charge for:
(1) the availability of treatment works and interceptors
comprising the metropolitan disposal system; and
(2) connections, direct and indirect, to the metropolitan
disposal system.
The charge is hereby imposed on each building in the City which, at the time of
construction, will have access directly or indirectly to the metropolitan disposal
system, and on each connection permit issued for existing buildings which will
have access directly or indirectly to the metropolitan disposal system. The
charge shall be payable at the time of, and as a condition to, the issuance of
such building permit or such connection permit, as the case may be.
(b) The charge for each building shall be an amount equal to the
Service Availability Charge (SAC) rate as set out in Ordinance No. 171 times the
number of SAC units (rounded) computed as follows:
A. Single family houses, townhouses and duplex units shall
each comprise one unit; .
B. Each apartment and condominium unit shall comprise 80% of a
unit;
C. Each other building and structure shall comprise one unit
a
for each 274 gallons of daily flow (and a pro rata portion of a
unit equal to the pro rata portion of any 274 gallons) which
the City estimates it will discharge, but each commercial and
industrial building shall comprise a minimum of one unit;
D. Each public housing unit and each housing unit subsidized under
any government program for low- and - moderate income housing
shall comprise 75% of the unit equivalent for that type of
housing."
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and
publication.
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Rice.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Ordinance adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 122 (PERSONNEL ORDINANCE) ADOPTED ON SECOND READING Mayor Richards
recalled that at the last meeting the Council had given First Reading to Ordinance
No. 122, subject to an addendum being added that the maximum amount of vacation be
limited to five weeks. He pointed out that, in response, an addendum has been
added to Sec. 9 (e) of Ordinance No. 122 which states that the maximum amount of
vacation that may be taken on an annual basis is twenty -five (25) days.
Member Rice asked if the Manager would have some latitude with regard to the
maximum amount of vacation that may be taken. Manager Rosland said he felt that
five weeks maximum is fine and that if there was an occasional request to exceed
that limit he would bring it to the Council for approval. Mayor Richards asked
for further comment or questions on the ordinance or the Employee Handbook. No
other comment or objection was heard.
Member Smith moved Second Reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 122 as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 122
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A BASIC PERSONNEL POLICY
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA. MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1.. Purpose. The purpose of this ordinance is to establish a system
of municipal personnel administration for all the employees of the City:
Sec. 2. Definitions
Types of employment for the purpose of this ordinance No. 122, shall be
defined as follows:
1. Regular full -time employment - This is employment on a
year - round, full -time basis.
2. Regular part -time employment - This is employment on less than a
full -time basis but extending year - round.
3. Temporary full -time employment — This is employment on a full -time
basis but for a limited period only pursuant to a written contract
with the City.
4. Temporary /seasonal part -time employment - This is employment on
either a full -time basis or less than a full -time basis but is for a
limited period or seasonal period only and for which there is no
written contract with the City.
5. Full -time - This means employment where the employee is regularly
engaged on a scheduled basis for a period of at least 40 hours in
every seven day work cycle.
6. Year - This means in connection with term of employment, each period
starting with the date of initial employment or any anniversary
thereof and ending the day before the then neat subsequent
anniversary of such date.
7. Employee - This means, unless restricted by any specific language
herein, all employees of the City, regular, temporary, full -time and
part -time.
Sec. 3. Scope of the Ordinance.
(a) Personnel covered. Except as otherwise specifically provided, this
ordinance applies to regular full -time employees, regular part -time employees, and
temporary full -time employees, and temporary /seasonal part -time employees, of the
City except the following:
1. All Elected Officials;
2. The City Attorneys;
3. The City Health Officer;
4. Members of City Boards, Commissions, and Committees;
5. Volunteer Fire Fighters and other volunteers; and
6. City Manager
(b) Provisions inapplicable under certain cases. Any employee included in a
collective bargaining agreement entered into in accordance with the public
employment labor relations act (MS Sec. 179A.01 to 179A.25) shall be exempt from
any provision of this ordinance which is addressed by such agreement, except,
however, as specifically provided in Sec. 9 Subd. (f) and Sec. 10 Subd. (a)
hereof. Nothing in this ordinance is intended to modify or' supersede or to add to
or to detract from any provision of the Veterans' Preference Act, Minnesota
Statutes Sections 197.455, 197.46 and 43A.11, or of any collective bargaining
agreement now in force.
(c) The benefits created or granted by this ordinance, including, without
limitation, vacation leave, sick leave and severance pay, shall apply to and
benefit only regular full -time employees and not any regular part -time employees,
temporary full -time employees or temporary part -time employees, except as
otherwise specifically provided herein and except as otherwise required by
applicable law.
(d) The rights, duties and benefits of each temporary full -time employee
shall be as stated in, and shall be controlled by, that employee's contract with
the City, and not by this ordinance.
(e) The provisions of this ordinance shall be subject to all applicable
laws, statutes, rules, ordinances and regulations, which shall control over any
contrary or inconsistent provisions of this ordinance.
Sec. 4. Powers and Duties of the City Manager on Personnel Matters. The
City Manager shall perform duties and exercise powers concerning personnel matters
as follows:
(a) Prepare and recommend to the City Council such changes in this ordinance
as he /she may consider necessary or desirable.
(b) Appoint, promote, transfer, reprimand, suspend, demote, and dismiss
department heads and City employees based on merit and fitness. Merit and fitness
may be determined by such oral, written or other examinations, investigations or
means, as may from time to time be deemed appropriate by the City Manager.
(c) Prepare, put into effect and maintain a classification plan based on
duties, responsibilities and authority of the employees within the City.
(d) Prepare and maintain a compensation plan.for all positions in the
classification plan.
(e) Issue rules and regulations governing the conduct of personnel and the
performance of their assigned duties.
(f) Issue such rules and regulations and perform or cause to be performed
such other activities with reference to personnel administration as may be
determined by the City Manager to be appropriate.
(g) The City Manager, from time to time, may delegate and from time to time
may revoke such delegation of any or all of his/her authority granted by or
derived from this ordinance or other applicable law or statute to such person or
persons as he /she shall designate, and references herein to the City Manager shall
mean and include any such designee.
Sec. 5. Appointments. Every appointment to City employment shall be made by
the City Manager, and shall be made on the basis of merit and fitness for the
position. Merit and fitness shall be ascertained by such means as are deemed
appropriate by the City Manager to evaluate the ability of the candidate to
discharge the duties and responsibilities of the position subject to the
appointment.
(a) The City shall provide equal opportunity to all employees and applicants
for employment in accordance with all applicable Equal Employment
Opportunity /Affirmative Action laws, statutes and regulations of federal, state
and local governing bodies, including any such equal opportunity /affirmative
action plans of the City.
(b) The City shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for
employment because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex,
disability, age, marital status, or status with regard to public assistance.
(c) In the selection process in the areas of public safety, public works,
park maintenance and such other areas of City employment as are deemed appropriate
by the City Manager, the City Manager shall require the person who is offered
employment, subject to passing a physical and or psychological examination, to
take a physical and /or psychological examination.
Sec. 6. Probation Period. The probationary period is hereby determined to
be an integral part of the employee selection process and shall be utilized for
observing the employee's work, for securing the most effective adjustment of the
employee to the position, and for rejecting any employee whose performance does
not meet the required work standards. All regular full -time and regular part -time
employees are subject to a probationary period but temporary full -time and
temporary part -time employees shall not be subject to a probationary period.
(a) Duration. Every original and every promotional appointment is subject
to a probationary period of twelve (12) months after the appointment. The
probationary period may be extended for up to six (6) months by the City Manager
for reasons deemed sufficient by the City Manager.
(b) Termination. The City Manager or his/her designee may terminate an
employee at any time during the probationary period of that employee. The
employee so terminated shall be notified in writing of the termination and shall
not be entitled to a hearing.
(c) Completion. Immediately prior to the expiration of the probationary
period, the department head shall notify the City Manager, in writing, whether or
not the services of the employee have been satisfactory and whether or not the
employee will continue. If notification states that the employee will be
continued, the probationary period shall end. If the department head is the
person to whom notice is being given, the City Manager shall perform the duties of
the department head under this paragraph.
(d) Leave Benefits during Probation. During the first six (6) months of
each probationary period, except a promotional probationary period, an employee
will not be entitled to use sick leave or vacation leave. Sick leave and vacation
leave shall accrue from the start of the probationary employment even though not
useable during the first six months of the probationary period.
(e) Rehire. Any employee who voluntarily or involuntarily leaves the
employment of the City and later is rehired, shall be subject to the same
probationary period as a new employee. Such employees shall receive no credit for
prior years of service with the City in terms of pay or seniority status in
determining duty shifts, work assignments or other benefits.
Sec. 7. Compensation.
(a) Amount. Employees of the City shall be compensated according to the
schedule established from time to time by the City Council. Any wage or salary so
established shall be the total remuneration for employment, but shall not be
considered as remuneration which may be allowed for official travel or other
expenses incurred in the conduct of official City business. Unless approved by
the City Manager, no employee shall receive compensation from the City in addition
to the salary authorized for the position to which he /she has been appointed.
(b) Comparable Worth Value. Subject to Minnesota Statutes, Sections
179.A.01 to 179.A.25 but notwithstanding any other laws to the contrary, the City
established on August 1, 1987, equitable compensation relationships as prescribed
by Minnesota Statutes Sections 471.991 to 471.999. Therefore, compensation of
each class of City employee shall be fixed in compliance with the provisions of
those statutes.
(c) Regular Hourly Rate of Pay. Employees who are compensated at an hourly
rate under the State or Federal Fair Labor Standards Act shall have said hourly
rate computed as provided by applicable law.
(d) Temporary and Part -time Employees. Whenever an employee is hired to
work on less than a full -time basis or for temporary employment, compensation
shall be paid for the position hired as provided for in the part -time and
temporary compensation plan then approved by the City Council. Temporary and
part -time employees are not entitled to sick leave or vacation leave except to the
extent determined necessary or desirable by the City Manager for the proper
administration of the City.
(e) Overtime. Employees to whom either the State or Federal Fair Labor
Standards Act apply shall be compensated for overtime at one and one -half times (1
1/2) the regular rate of pay. To the extent permitted by law and policy then
established by an employee's department head, and which policy has been approved
by the City Manager, an employee may accrue and use compensatory time instead of
pay at overtime rates. Overtime shall be paid or compensatory time accrued, for
hours worked in excess of 40 hours within a defined seven -day work period as
directed by a department head and in accordance with the State or Federal Fair
Labor Standards Act and /or applicable Minnesota Statutes.
Each department head shall be responsible for the accounting and certification to
the payroll clerk of overtime worked and compensatory time taken by each employee
in his/her department.
(f) Paydays. Employees shall be paid bi- weekly on alternate Fridays. When
a payday falls on a holiday, employees shall be paid on the preceding work day.
Sec. 8. Work Hours. Work schedules for employees shall be established by
the appropriate department head with the approval of the City Manager. The
regular work week for employees is five (5) eight -hour (8) working days in
addition to one thirty (30) minute lunch period per working day within a seven day
cycle, except as otherwise established by the department head with the approval of
the City Manager.
Sec. 9. Vacation Leave With Pay.
(a) Eligibility. Regular full -time employees shall accrue vacation leave
according to the following schedule. No other types of employees are eligible for
or shall accrue vacation leave with pay.
(b) Amount. The following accrual schedule shall apply to eligible
employees:
1 - 5 continuous years of 3.076 hours per pay period
regular full -time employment (10 days per year)
6 - 10 continuous years of 4.61 hours per pay period
regular full -time employment (15 days per year)
11 - 15 continuous years of An additional .307 hours
regular full -time employment per pay period or one
additional day of vacation
for each additional year of
service to 15 years of
service. (total at
15 years of service - 20
days per year).
16 years or more of continuous 6.154 hours per pay period
service of regular full -time (20 days per year)
employment.
(c) Conditions Affecting Accrual of Vacation - Although leaves of absence,
under Sec. 12 of this ordinance, do not affect the continuous years of service,
for the purpose of determining accrual rates, vacation shall not accrue during
leaves of absence under said Sec. 12.
(d) When Taken. Vacation leave may be used as earned, subject to the
approval of the department heads to the time at which it is taken.
(e) Minimum and Maximum Amount Used Annually. All regular full -time
employees with over five (5) continuous years of service shall take a minimum of
five (5) days of vacation per year. All regular full -time employees with over ten
(10) continuous years of service shall use a minimum of ten (10) days of vacation
per year. All regular full -time employees with over fifteen (15) years of
continuous years of employment shall use a minimum of fifteen (15) days of
vacation per year. The maximum amount of vacation that may be taken on an annual
basis is twenty -five (25) days.
(f) Terminal Leave. All employees who accrue vacation and who leave
employment with the City in good standing, as described in Section 16 of this
ordinance, shall be compensated for accrued and unused vacation at the date of
separation not to exceed 240 hours. The provisions of this paragraph (f) shall
apply to employees included in collective bargaining agreements who accrue
vacation but no other provisions of this section shall apply to such employees.
(g) Accrual During Leave. An employee using earned vacation or sick leave
shall accrue vacation and sick leave during such use.
Sec. 10. Sick Leave.
(a) Eligibility. Every regular full -time employee shall be entitled to and
shall accrue sick leave with pay. No other types of employees are entitled to or
shall accrue sick leave with pay.
(b) Amount. All employees entitled to sick leave shall accrue sick leave at
a rate of 3.69 hours per pay period.
(c) Purpose. Sick leave may be granted to employees entitled thereto when
the employee is unable to perform scheduled work duties due to illness /disability,
the necessity for medical, dental or chiropractic care, child birth or pregnancy
disability, or exposure to contagious disease, where such exposure may endanger
the health of others with whom the employee would come in contact in the course of
performing work duties. Sick leave pay may also be granted for a maximum of five
(5) working days for the serious illness or death of an employee's spouse,
children, father, mother, spouse's father or mother and resident members of the
employee's household. Sick leave may be granted for a maximum of three (3) days
in the event of the death of an employee's grandparent, grandchild, brother or
sister.
(d) Proof.
1. To be eligible for sick leave with pay, the regular full -time
employee shall report his/her absence to his/her supervisor within the first
thirty (30) minutes of the the start of that employee's scheduled work period.
2. To be eligible for sick leave with pay, an employee entitled thereto
shall keep his/her supervisor informed of his/her condition or the condition of
the family member that is ill on a daily basis and if the absence is of more than
three (3) working days duration, submit a medical certificate in form and
substance acceptable to the City Manager or department head. The City Manager or
department head shall have the right to verify any reported illness of an employee
by such means as he /she deems necessary. The employee may also be required to
submit proof, satisfactory to the City Manager or department head of his/her
physical /emotional ability to perform his/her duties upon his/her return from sick
leave.
(e) Penalty. Using or claiming sick leave for a purpose not authorized by
subdivision (c) shall be cause for disciplinary action under Section 19,
reprimand, suspension or dismissal.
(f) Accrual During Leave. An employee using earned vacation or sick leave
shall accrue vacation or sick leave during such use.
(g) No Payments for Unused Sick Leave Upon Termination. Upon termination of
employment, there will be no payments for accrued but unused sick leave.
(h) The provisions of this Sec. 10 except paragraphs (a) and (b) hereof,
shall be used to administer sick leave provisions of any collective bargaining
agreements which include City employees.
Sec. 11. Military Leave. Every employee to whom Minnesota Statutes,
Sections 192.26 or 192.261, or U.S.C.A., Title 38, section 2021, applies, is
entitled to the benefits, but subject to conditions prescribed therein as required
by law.
Sec. 12. Leave Without Pay. The City Manager may grant any regular
full -time employee a leave of absence without pay for a period not to exceed
ninety (90) calendar days except that the City Manager may extend such leave to a
maximum period of 120 calendar days in case the employee is disabled or where
extraordinary circumstances, in the City Manager's judgement, warrant such
extension. No vacation or sick leave with pay benefits shall accrue during a
leave of absence without pay. During a leave of absence, health, life insurance,
and long term disability insurance premiums are paid by the employee with no
contribution by the City.
Sec. 13. Parental Leave. Any employee who has been employed by the City for
more than one year, is entitled to take an unpaid leave of absence in connection
with the birth or adoption of a child. The leave may not exceed six weeks and
must begin not more than six weeks after the birth or adoption of the child. The
employee is entitled to return to work at the same position and at the same rate
of pay the employee was receiving prior to the commencement of the leave but
including any automatic adjustments that occurred during the leave. Health
insurance coverage will remain in effect during the leave. Vacation and sick
leave will continue to accrue during parental leave. The provisions of this
section shall be subject to and conform with applicable law.
Sec. 14. Jury Duty. When a regular full -time or regular part -time employee
performs jury duty, the employee is entitled to compensation from the City equal
to the difference between his/her regular pay and the amount received as a juror.
Sec. 15. Rest Periods and Holidays.
(a) Rest Periods. Every employee, when working under conditions where a
break period is practicable, shall be granted a fifteen (15) minute break period
in each half of the employee's shift. Each department head shall schedule rest
periods so as not to interfere with work requirements.
(b) Holidays. The following calendar days and such other days as designated
by the City Council are paid holidays: New Year's Day - January 1; Martin Luther
Ring's Birthday - the third Monday in January; Washington and Lincoln's Birthday -
the third Monday in February; Memorial Day - the last Monday in May; Independence
Day - July 4; Labor Day - the first Monday in September; Veteran's Day - November
11; Thanksgiving Day - the fourth Thursday in November; the Friday after
Thanksgiving; and Christmas Day - December 25. Also one -half day on Christmas Eve
- December 24, and one -half day on New Year's Eve - December 31, shall also be
paid holidays whenever they fall on one of the days Monday through Friday. When
New Year's Day, Independence Day, Veteran's Day or Christmas fall on Saturday, the
preceding Friday is the holiday, and should these days fall on Sunday, the
following Monday shall be the holiday. All regular full -time employees are
entitled to time off with full pay on holidays. The City Hall shall be closed for
business on each such holiday, but employees may be required to work on paid
holidays when the nature of their duties or other conditions require. An employee
required to work on a holiday shall receive another day off within thirty (30)
days thereafter as the department head determines unless consideration is given to
this factor in determining work schedules. Each holiday commences at the
beginning of the first shift on the day on which the holiday occurs and continues
for twenty -four (24) hours thereafter. Eligible employees shall receive pay for
official holidays at their normal rate of pay if they are at work or on a leave of
absence with pay the last regular day or shift to which they were or would have
been assigned prior to the holiday and the first regular day or shift to which
they were or would have been assigned following the holiday. In addition to
meeting the foregoing criteria, part -time employees, both regular and temporary,
are entitled to pay on a holiday only if they would normally.be scheduled to work
on the day of the week designated as the holiday and they shall be paid only for
the number of hours they would have worked. The City Manager, in his/her
discretion, may grant paid holidays to individuals for the celebration of certain
religious holy days observed by their particular faith.
Sec. 16. Resignation. Any employee wishing to leave municipal service in
good standing shall file with his/her department head and the City Manager, at
least fourteen (14) calendar days before leaving, a written resignation stating
the effective date of resignation and the reason for leaving, and shall be present
at work the three consecutive work days prior to the final date of employment with
the City. Failure to comply with this procedure may, at the discretion of the
City Manager, be considered cause for denying the employee terminal leave benefits
and /or future employment by the City. Unauthorized absence from work for a period
of three consecutive days may be considered at the discretion of the department
head and City Manager as a resignation without such benefits.
Sec. 17. Severance Pay.
(a) Eligible Employees
1. General Rule. The City shall provide severance pay only to those
regular full -time employees who are no longer in their original probationary
period (as contrasted with a promotional probationary period), who leave
employment with the City in good standing as described in Sec. 16 of this
Ordinance, and whose employment ends:
(i) due to total and permanent disability, as determined by PERA
under PERA rules; or
(ii) after completion of twenty years of continuous service to the
City.
2. Special Rule. The City Manager, in his/her sole discretion, is
authorized to award severance pay to any employee or group of employees in regular
full -time employment who are terminated due to the effects of a permanent
elimination by the City of any functions or activities of the City.
3. Exclusion. Employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement
shall not be eligible for severance pay under this Section 16.
(b) Amount. The eligible employee's severance pay shall be a lump sum
amount equal to six weeks pay.
(c) Time. The City shall provide the severance pay on the payday
immediately following the eligible employee's severance date. For total and
permanent disability, however, the City shall provide the severance pay on the
payday immediately following its receipt of appropriate notice of PERA's
determination.
(d) Definitions. The following special definitions apply only to this
Section.
1. "Eligible Employee" means an employee of the-City who is eligible
for severance pay under paragraph (a) of this section.
2. "Regular Full -Time Employment" means employment with the City where
the employee is regularly engaged on a minimum of 40 hours every seven day cycle,
as determined by the needs and particular customs in the employee's department.
3. "Pay" means the eligible employee's regular basic salary or wage
(before any payroll deductions) for regular full -time employment in effect on the
severance date.
4. "PERA" means the Public Employees Retirement Association under
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 353 (or any subsequent amendment or replacement
thereof).
5. "PERA rules" means the requirements for payment of an annuity or
benefit from PERA as of May 31, 1989 (including any changes in such requirements
adopted as of that date, but effective after that date).
6. "Severance date" means the last date on which the eligible employee
performs duties in full -time employment.
Sec. 18. Grievance Policy. It is the policy of the City insofar as possible
to prevent the occurrence of grievances and to deal promptly with those which
occur. An employee may grieve only those subjects identified within this
ordinance. An employee has five (5) working days from the date of the occurrence
within which to bring the grievance to the attention of his/her supervisor. When
any employee grievance comes to the attention of a supervisory employee, the
supervisor shall discuss all relevant circumstances with the employee, consider
and examine the causes of the grievance, and attempt to resolve it to the extent
of 'the supervisor's authority to do so. If the grievance remains unresolved at
that level, the grievance may be appealed to the next administrative level, and so
on up to and including the City Manager and City Council. The Council's decision
concerning a grievance is final.
Sec. 19. Lay -Off. The City Manager may lay -off any employee when in the
sole and exclusive judgement of the City Manager it is appropriate because of the
shortage of work, funding of positions, changes in the organization or any other
reason.
Sec. 20. Discipline.
(a) General. All City employees shall be subject to disciplinary action,
including dismissal, for failing to fulfill their duties and responsibilities as
determined by the City. The following grounds may as deemed appropriate by the
City be the basis for discipline, including dismissal. These are examples only:
1. Unauthorized possession and /or use of City property.
2. Refusal or failure to comply with an assignment or order or to
perform assigned work.
3. Unauthorized absence.
4. Tardiness after warning.
5. Possession, sale, consumption, or under the influence of
non - prescription drugs, alcohol, or other controlled substances
while on duty.
6. Violation of law, or of City work rules, policies or practices as
deemed appropriate by the City Manager.
7. Failure to perform assigned tasks at a performance level or in a
manner satisfactory to the City Manager.
The above are intended to serve only as examples and are not the exclusive
grounds for which the City may discipline, including dismissal. -The City reserves
the right to determine that other actions or inaction are grounds for discipline,
including dismissal.
Employees subject to discipline have the right to pursue the grievance
procedure or hearing procedure as provided for herein.
(b) As determined by the sole judgement of the City, disciplinary action may
involve any of the following steps, whether or not any specific progression is
followed, as determined by the City:
1. Oral reprimand;
2. Written reprimand;
3. Suspension with or without pay;
4. Demotion, transfer; and
5. Dismissal.
(c) Before any employee is suspended, demoted, transferred, or dismissed for
disciplinary reasons, the employee shall be given written notice of the reason(s)
for any such proposed action. The employee shall also be given notice of a
hearing to be held before the City Manager. The employee may be accompanied at
the hearing by a representative. At this hearing the City Manager shall receive
evidence offered in support of the reasons for the proposed action and evidence as
may be presented by and /or on behalf of the employee. After the close of the
hearing, the City Manager shall consider the evidence presented and make a
decision. Notwithstanding the following provisions regarding notice of proposed
action and an opportunity for hearing before personnel action is taken, the City
reserves the right in cases it considers proper, such as those involving safety,
and health considerations, and /or other hazards affecting the interests of
employees and /or other persons, or in other appropriate circumstances as
determined by the City to remove an employee from the performance of duties in
whole or in part before any such hearing is held or decision made pending such
decision.
(d) The findings and conclusions of the City Manager shall be in writing,
filed with the City Clerk, and served on the employee. The decision of the City
Manager shall be implemented upon such filing and service.
(e) In cases where the City Manager decides to impose personnel action
affecting the employee as a result of proceedings instituted under this section,
the employee shall have the right to appeal said decisions to the City Council.
Said appeal must be made in writing and filed with the City Manager within five
working days after the notification to the employee of the decision of the City
Manager. The appeal and hearings conducted pursuant to any such appeal before the
City Council shall be conducted as determined by the Council; and may include the
appointment of a committee of the Council to hear the appeal. Such committee
shall prepare findings and conclusions for submission to the Council for its
consideration and action. The action of the City Council on any such appeal may
affirm, overrule, or modify the action of the City Manager. The findings and
conclusions of the Council on an appeal shall be in writing, filed with the City
Clerk, and served upon the employee and the City Manager. The City Council's
action on such appeal shall be final.
(f) If the disciplinary action involves the removal of a veteran, the
hearing shall be held in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, 197.46.
Sec. 21. Sexual Harassment - The City is committed to providing a work
environment that is free of sexual harassment. In keeping with this commitment,
the City maintains a policy prohibiting sexual harassment. This policy prohibits
sexual harassment in any form, including verbal and physical harassment.
Sec. 22. Unlawful Acts.
(a) Falsification of Records. No person shall knowingly make any false
statement, certificate, mark, rating, or report in regard to any test, certificate
or appointment held or made under the City personnel system or in any manner
commit or attempt to commit any fraud preventing the impartial execution of the
provisions of this ordinance.
(b) Rendering of Consideration: No person seeking employment to or
promotion in the service of the City shall directly or indirectly give, render, or
pay any money, service, or valuable consideration to any person, on account of or
in connection with his/her test, employment, or promotion, or proposed employment
or promotion.
Sec. 23. Officials Under Workers Compensation Act. Pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes Section 176.011, Subdivision 9, the elected officers of the City and
those municipal officers appointed to a regular term of office or to complete the
unexpired portion of a regular term, are hereby included in the coverage of the
Minnesota Workers Compensation Act.
Sec. 24. Political Activity. An employee may not use official authority or
influence to compel a person to apply for membership in or become a member of a
political organization, to pay or promise to pay a political contribution, or to
take part in political activity. (Minn. Statute, 211B.09).
Any employee who shall become a candidate for a federal, state or municipal
elective office, or assume a federal, state or municipal elective office, shall be
expected to properly fulfill his/her normal duties during such candidacy and while
holding such office and may be disciplined for failure to do so. Also, an
employee holding such office shall be permitted time off from regular employment
to attend meetings required by reason of the public office. Such time off may be
without pay, with pay, or made up with other hours, as agreed between the employee
and the City Manager. (Minn. Statute, 211B.10, Subd. 2).
Any employee whose principal employment in the City is in connection with an
activity which is funded in whole or in part by the United States or a federal
agency is also subject to the restrictions and penalties of the Federal Hatch Act.
(Title 5, S.1501, et. seq, U.S.C.A.)
Sec. 25. Penaltv. Any person violating any provision of Section 22 of this
Ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to penalties set forth in
Ordinance No. 175.
Sec. 26. Repealer. Ordinance No. 121, as amended, is hereby repealed in its
entirety.
Sec. 27. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage
and publication.
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Paulus.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Ordinance adopted.
*BID AWARDED FOR CENTENNIAL LAKES PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT NOS. BA -189. BA -190, STS -197
AND STS -198 Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly for
award of bid for Centennial Lakes Public Improvement Nos. BA -189, BA -190, STS -197
and STS -198 to recommended low bidder, Progressive Contractors, Inc., at
$1,777,672.35.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF 8/15189 APPROVED Assistant Manager Gordon
Hughes directed the Council's attention to item (1) in Section A of the Traffic
Safety Committee Minutes of August 15, 1989 - Discuss "NO PARKING" sign in front
of residence at 4622 Edgebrook Place, noting that Robert Trucker and John Palombo
were present to speak to the issue.
Assistant Manager Hughes explained that the, matter revolves around a "NO PARKING"
sign that was placed at 4622 Edgebrook Place last June. The sign was placed in
order to prohibit parking on the west side of Edgebrook so as to enable
Mr. Palombo to access his driveway. The Committee recommended and the Council
adopted a condition to that sign that it be subject to approval of the resident at
4622 Edgebrook Place. Following erection of the sign the property was sold to
Mr. Trucker who is in the process of rehabilitating it and who appeared before the
Committee on August 15, 1989 requesting that the sign now be removed. The
Committee heard testimony from both Mr. Trucker and Mr. Palombo concerning the
matter. Mr. Palombo's position was that he wishes the sign to remain in place on
a permanent basis. On a 3 -1 vote the Committee recommended that the sign should
remain a permanent installation and should not be subject to the approval or
disapproval of the resident at 4622 Edgebrook. Edgebrook Place is presently
signed "NO PARKING" on the east side (inside of the Edgebrook curve). This is the
only space on the west side that is signed "NO PARKING ".
Mayor Richards restated the issue that when the Council approved the Traffic
Safety Committee Minutes of June 13, 1989 the "NO PARKING" sign to be installed in
front of 4622 Edgebrook Place was based on approval by the resident at that
address and that now the Traffic Safety Committee is reversing its position.
Eric Engwaldson, Bennett Ingvaldson & McInerny, stated that'he was representing
Mr. Trucker and his company, Cornerstone Construction Company. He said he did not
take issue with anything that has been said and agreed with the Mayor's
summarization of the issue with one point. Three people on staff have all
expressed, as reflected in the Committee minutes and-in correspondence, that they
agreed with Mr. Trucker's position and the Traffic Safety Committee did not uphold
staff's position on the issue. He said that this affects only one piece of
property, that of Mr. Palombo's. The property at 4622 Edgebrook already has a
hydrant in front and the sign removes the ability to park in the only other space
in front of the property. The consent of Dr. and Mrs. Miller was obtained but the
consent of the other affected residents was not obtained. He said that visitors
to 4622 Edgebrook will now have to park in front of the other neighbors' houses.
Mr. Engwaldson also commented that the Council approved the sign at their June
19th meeting subject to obtaining the consent of the owner of the property at that
time. Furthermore, this matter was hurriedly brought to the Committee by
Mr. Palombo during the interim period of time that the property at 4622 Edgebrook
was being sold to Mr. Trucker and none of this information was disclosed to
Mr. Trucker.
Mr. Engwaldson argued that the City's policy ought to be, and apparently was as
set forth in Mr. Hoffman's letter of June 16, 1989 to Mr. Palombo, which stated
that "the essence of the approval relies on your neighbor's present approval and
continued approval. The general City policy is not to place restrictions on
streets to facilitate private access. Your situation may ultimately need to be
remedied by alteration of your driveway." Mr. Engwaldson said that Mr. Palombo
has a narrow driveway with small retaining walls on each side and that it could be
easily remedied without affecting the private property rights of the neighbors and
Mr. Trucker. He concluded by saying that Mr. Trucker feels the sign diminishes
the value of his property,.
John Palombo, 4624 Browndale Avenue, presented and explained photographs showing
his driveway, the no parking location, the position of the hydrant relative to an
elm tree and relative to the location of the subject sign, and a car parked in the
sign location in question. He said that what prompted the sign request was the
fact that he and his wife were expecting their first child and they have had a
number of situations.whereby their driveway was blocked so that they could not get
out. He also presented a letter from Ed Anderson, realtor, who stated that he had
never seen the existence of a "No Parking" sign affect the saleability of a single
family dwelling, having been involved in over 1,200 transactions. Mr. Palombo
stated that Mr. Trucker is asking for removal of the sign so that he may benefit
in the resale of a home that he is remodeling. He said he is simply asking for
free access to his residence. He refuted the implication that this issue was
brought to the Committee in a hurry in June. He said that the matter was brought
to Mr. Hoffman's attention on several occasions prior to the Traffic Safety
Committee meeting in June. Mr. Palombo stated that the matter was brought to
Dr. and Mrs. Miller the day after he received the correspondence from the Traffic
Safety Committee and was returned that same day.
Mr. Palombo said that another issue that was brought up at the Committee meeting
was that the house was built in 1926 - why has this now become an issue. He said
that since they purchased the home in 1984, with the exception of three homes,
every home on his block on Browndale Avenue and behind on Edgebrook Place have
changed owners.. Ownership has gone from people that were retired, semi - retired or
empty nesters to growing families with more active life styles. This has added to
the traffic pressure on Edgebrook. Mr. Palombo said that he has talked to his
immediate neighbors and they are in favor of having the sign stay there.
As to the suggestion that he widen his driveway, Mr. Palombo said he would be
happy to reimburse the City for the cost and time involved in placing the sign in
its location. He said it is disconcerting to have to spend several thousand
dollars to remove the retaining wall, replace it and remove the fence and replace
it and incur an expense that is being dictated by a real estate speculator who has
no intention of making that residence his homestead. In conclusion Mr. Palombo
.said he was simply asking for access to his residence.
Member Paulus commented that she was concerned that a precedence would be set if
the "NO PARKING" sign was approved.
Member Rice asked the reason for the "no" vote on the motion by the Committee to
leave the "NO PARKING" sign in place. Craig Swanson, Committee Member, said the
primary reason was the June 26th letter of Francis Hoffman to Mr. Palombo which he
interpreted as calling for initial and continuing approval by the resident at
4622 Edgebrook Place. The other factor that was not mentioned was that the sign
does not guarantee that there will not be a car parked there and the driveway
could be blocked.
Following discussion, Member Smith moved that the Council not approve the
recommended action of the Traffic Safety Committee concerning item (1) in Section
A (to leave the "NO PARKING" sign in place). Motion was seconded by Member
Paulus.
Mayor Richards said he did not intend to support the motion because it would be
unfair and that action to deprive a resident of access to his home is being
requested by someone "who does not intend to occupy the property affected by the
sign. He said that he felt this is a situation that should be decided on a case
by case basis and that the photographs clearly show the difficulty in exiting from
Mr. Palombo's driveway. Mayor Richards then called for vote on the motion.
Ayes: Paulus, Smith
Nays: Kelly, Rice, Richards
Motion defeated.
Member Kelly then moved approval of the recommended action listed in Section A (1)
of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of August 15, 1989 to leave the "NO
PARKING" sign in place in front of 4622 Edgebrook Place.
Ayes: Kelly, Rice, Richards
Nays: Paulus, Smith
Motion carried.
Member Kelly moved approval of the following additional recommended action listed
in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of August 15, 1989:
(2) To replace the diamond arrow sign now in place at the West 50th Street/France
Avenue crosswalk area with a sign reading "STOP FOR PEDESTRIAN ",
(3) To install pedestrian signs with the 25 mph advisory attachments westbound on
Country Club Road at Moorland and eastbound on Country Club Road at Browndale
Avenue,
and to acknowledge Sections B and C of the Minutes. Motion for approval was
seconded by Member Smith.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
REPORT PRESENTED ON RECYCLING PROGRAM Janet Chandler, Recycling Coordinator,
presented a progress report on the new Recycling Program summarized as follows.
New Program Results - Results for July showed an average participation rate of
31.4% on any given day, increasing to a 39% average for the first two weeks of
August. The areas which were previously served in the monthly recycling pickup
are participating at a higher rate. 210 tons of material were picked up in July -
about 100 tons more than the.previous monthly totals. A daily participation rate
is lower than a total participation rate, since many recyclers do not place
materials out each week. Recycling Center - Receipts are down considerably. July .
tonnage totaled about 43 tons, compared to the June total of 117 tons (pickup and
Center combined). Total July Tonnage, Recycling Goals - Edina residential waste
is approximately 1,676 tons per month. Household pickup of paper, glass and cans
totaled 210.68 tons, with Center tonnage at 43 for a July total of 253.68 tons.
Waste reduction was 15 %. Edina has exceeded the 10% reduction goal required by
Hennepin County for full 80% program funding. Container Delivery - BFI plans to
complete container delivery by August 18. As containers were delivered,
participation jumped for that particular route the next pickup. Promotion - An
ongoing promotion plan is needed to increase participation. There is also a need
to clarify questions on placement of recyclables, garbage and yard waste. Several
actions are being planned to deal with these issues. Summary - The new recycling
program is off to a good start. The drivers are getting to know the City and
problems are being worked out. Participation is expected to increase as more
residents discover how easy it is to recycle in Edina.
John Moorland, BFI, presented statistics showing weekly participation in the
program for July and August, and noted that there was a gradual increase in
participation. He said that the drop in tonnage after the first weeks was normal.
All containers should be delivered by August 22. Mr. Moorland showed a sample of
the handout being distributed by the drivers which included a checklist to
facilitate pickup of recyclables. A notice also is being printed that will be
given to residents explaining that the proper location for recyclable pickup as
well as garbage pickup is at the garage within sight from the street.and that only
compost materials may be placed at the curb. Also, BFI has developed a program
for their drivers that along with the normal safety and procedural training
includes customer service and background information on recycling in general and
the recycling program. Mr. Moorland said they are trying to establish a core of
five drivers for Edina who will have their own base customers for whom they are
responsible.
The Council discussed various methods of reminding the residents that the program
is mandatory and ways to encourage participation in the program. Mayor Richards
suggested that it would be premature to do anything now and that staff should
continue reporting on the progress of the program on a monthly basis.
HEARING DATE OF 9/18189 SET FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS Motion was made by Member
Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly for adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARINGS
FOR VARIOUS IMPROVEMENTS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows:
1. The Clerk and Engineer having calculated the proper amounts to be assessed for
the improvements set forth in the Notice of Hearing forms hereinafter recorded,
and the amounts proposed to be assessed against the respective lots, places and -
parcels of land within the districts affected by said improvements, and said
proposed assessments having been filed with the Clerk, the same are hereby
approved and the Clerk shall keep the same on file in her office and open n to
public inspection pending hearings thereon as herein provided.
2. This Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the Notice of
Hearing form hereinafter contained, to pass upon said proposed assessments and the
Clerk's action in publishing notice of said hearings in the official newspaper in
accordance with law is hereby approved. Notices being as follows:
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR:
STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -281A
PARKING RAMP IMPROVEMENT NO. P -1B
MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. M -89
TREE REMOVAL IMPROVEMENT NO. TR -89
AQIIATIC WEEDS IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ -89
TREE TRIMMING IMPROVEMENT NO. TT -89
SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION NO. HC -11
STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NOS. STS -185, STS -186
WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NOS. WM -363, WM -364, WM -365
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NOS. SS -377, SS -378, SS -379
Notice is hereby given that the Edina City Council will meet at the City Hall at
4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota on September 18, 1989, at 7:00 P.M. to
hear, consider and pass upon all objections, both oral and written, to proposed
special assessments for the following improvements:
1. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -281A
Malibu Drive from Lincoln Drive to 710 feet Southeasterly
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Outlot E,
PARKWOOD KNOLLS 20TH ADDITION.(30- 117 -21 -32 -0010) and Lots 1, 4, 5, Block 1,
LANDMARK ADDITION (30- 117 -21 -32 -0014) (30- 117 -21 -32 -0017) (30- 117- 21 -32- 0018).
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $23,349.43
2. PARKING RAMP IMPROVEMENT NO. P -1B
West 51st Street Parking Ramp
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Edina
Theatre property described as commencing at a point in Northwest corner of Lot 47,
thence South'to Southwest corner thereof, thence West 13.9 feet, thence South 1.1
feet, thence West 36.1 feet, thence South 2.4 feet, thence West to a point 7 feet
East from West line of Lot 45, thence North 134.75 feet, thence West 4 feet,.
thence North to South line of West 50th Street, thence East 87 feet, thence South
to beginning, AUDITORS' SUBDIVISION NO. 172 (18- 028- 24 -42- 0052).
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS.: $240,000.00
3. MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. M -89
50th Street and France Avenue Business District
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: All
parcels contained within the 50th Street and France Avenue Business District.
TOTAL AMOUNT -OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $43,121.71
4. TREE REMOVAL IMPROVEMENT NO. TR -89
5200 Valley View Road and 4810 Brookside Avenue
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Lot 5,
Block 1, STRINGER'S ADDITION (04- 116 -21 -22 -0100) and Lot 6, EDINA TERRACE
(28- 117- 21 -24- 0037).
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $804.22
5. AQIIATIC WEEDS IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ -89
Mill Pond and Indianhead Lake
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: All lots
reparian to Indianhead Lake and Mill Pond.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $17,919.00
6. TREE TRIMMING IMPROVEMENT NO. TT -89
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: The area
bounded by Highway 169 on the West, Highway 100 on the East, Highway 62 on the
North and'the Southern City Boundary Line on the South.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $43,440.99
7. SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION NO. HC -11
4540 France Avenue South
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: North 42
feet of East 30 feet of Lot 8 and North 42 feet of Lots 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13,
including adjacent 18 feet of Harriet Avenue vacated except part taken for France
Avenue, Block 26, WAVELAND PARR ADDITION (07- 028- 24 -44- 0140).
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $6,200.00
8. STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. 185
Malibu Drive from Lincoln Drive to 290 feet Southeast
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Outlot E,
PARKWOOD KNOLLS 20TH ADDITION (30- 117- 21 -32- 0010); Tract A, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY
NO. 1503 (30- 117- 21 -31- 0011).
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $14,955.98
9. STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. 186
Minnesota Drive from France Avenue to Edinborough Way
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Lots 1
and 2, Block 1, (32- 028 -24 -23 -0283) (32- 028- 24 -32- 0005); Lot 1, Block 2
(32- 028- 24 -32- 0008); Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, (32- 028 -24 -32 -0006)
(32- 028- 24 -32- 0007); Lot 1, Block 4, (32- 028- 24 -32- 0005); Outlot B
(32- 028- 24 -23- 0285); Outlot D (32- 028 -24 -32 -0009) all in SOUTH EDINA DEVELOPMENT
ADDITION.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $63,984.94
10. WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -363
Malibu Drive from Lincoln Drive to 710 feet Southeasterly
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Lots 1
through 5, Block 1, LANDMARK ADDITION (30- 117 -21 -32 -0014) (30- 117 -21 -32 -0015)
(30- 117 -21 -32 -0016) (30- 117 -21 -32 -0017) (30- 117- 21 -32- 0018).
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $21,239.15
11. WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WN -364
Ryan Avenue from West 62nd Street to West 63rd Street
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: West 1/2
of Lots 2, 3, 4, Block 3, NORMANDALE ADDITION (30- 028 -24 -22 -0027)
(30- 028 -24 -22 -0028) (30- 028- 24 -22- 0031).
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $10,514.19
12. WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -365
Minnesota Drive from France Avenue to Edinborough Way
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Lots 1
and 2, Block 1 (32- 028 -24 -23 -0283) (32- 028- 24 -32- 0005); Lot 1, Block 2
(32- 028- 24 -32- 0008); Lots 1 and 2, Block 3 (32- 028 -24 -32 -0006)
(32- 028- 24 -32- 0007); Lot 1, Block 4 (32- 028- 24 -33- 0005); Outlot B
(32- 028- 24 -32- 0285); Outlot D (32- 028 -24 -32 -0009) all in SOUTH EDINA DEVELOPMENT
ADDITION.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF.PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $40,787.72
13. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -377
Malibu Drive from Lincoln Drive to 710 feet Southeasterly
The area proposed to be-assessed for.said improvement is as follows: Lots 1
through 5, Block 1, LANDMARK ADDITION (30- 117 -21 -32 -0014) (30- 117 -21 -32 -0015)
(30- 117 -21 -32 -0016) (30- 117 -21 -32 -0017) (30- 117- 21 -32- 0018).
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $29,700.85
14. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -378
Ryan Avenue from West 62nd Street to West 63rd Street
The area proposed to be assessed-for said improvement is as follows: West .1/2
of Lots 2, 3, 4, Block 3, NORMANDALE ADDITION (30- 028 -24 -22 -0027)
(30- 028 -24 -22 -028) (30- 028- 24 -22- 0031).
TOTAL AMOUNT-OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $17,211.24
15. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -379
Minnesota Drive from France Avenue to Edinborough Way
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Lots 1
and 2, Block 1 (32- 028 -24 -23 -0283) (32- 028- 24 -32- 0005); Lot 1, Block 2
(32- 028- 24 -32- 0008); Lots 1 and 2, Block 3 (32- 028 -24 -32 -0006)
(32- 028- 24 -32- 0007); Lot 1, Block 4 (32- 028- 24 -33- 0005); Outlot B
(32- 028- 24 -23- 0285); Outlot D (32- 028 -24 -32 -0009) all in SOUTH EDINA DEVELOPMENT
ADDITION.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT IS: $19,687.68
These proposed assessment rolls are now on file in the office of the City Clerk
and are open to public inspection.
APPEAL
Any owner may appeal the assessment to the District Court pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes 429.081, by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the
City of Edina within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment by the City
.Council, and by filing such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days
after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. However, no appeal may be taken as to an
assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is
filed with the Clerk of the City of Edina prior to the hearing or presented to the
presiding officer at the hearing.
DEFERRAL ON HOMESTEADS OWNED BY PERSONS 65 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, the City of Edina has adopted standards and
guidelines for deferring special assessments against homestead property owned by
persons 65 years of age or older for whom payment would be a hardship. To obtain
deferment, application must be filed with the City Assessor's office by the close
of business on the last business day before the City Council meeting set out in
the first paragraph of this notice. For further information and application
forms, please call or visit the City Assessor's office.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL.
Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*RESOLUTION ADOPTED SETTING HEARING DATE FOR VACATION OF SCRIVER ROAD RIGHT OF WAY
(LOTS 1 AND 2. BLOCK 1. HYIAND ACRES) - 5101 SCRIVER ROAD Motion was made by
Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly for adoption of the following
resolution:
RESOLUTION CALLING PUBLIC HEARING ON
VACATION OF EASEMENT FOR STREET PURPOSES
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. It is hereby found and determined that the following described easement for
street purposes should be considered for vacation, in accordance with the
provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851 and 160.29:
That part of SCRIVER ROAD lying northerly of the following described line:
Beginning at the southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1, HYLAND ACRES,
according to the recorded plat thereof; thence North 88 degrees 38
minutes 15 seconds East along the south line of said Lot 1 and its
easterly extension a distance of 51.67 feet; thence 67.92 feet along a
curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 64.43 feet and a
central angle of 60 degrees 23 minutes 45 seconds, to a point on the
southwesterly line of Lot 2, said Block 1, distant 31.04 feet
northwesterly from the most southerly corner of said Lot 2 and said
line there terminating.
2. This Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the form of notice
included in paragraph 3 hereof for the purpose of holding a public hearing on
whether such vacation shall be made in the interest of the,public.
3. The Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and
purpose of said hearing to be published once a week for two weeks, in the Edina
Sun - Current, being the official newspaper of the City, the first publication at
least 14 days prior to the date of such hearing and to post such notice, at least
14 days prior to the,date of such hearing, in at least three (3) public and
conspicuous places within the City, as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section
412.851. Such notice shall be in substantially the following form:
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ON VACATION OF EASEMENT FOR STREET PURPOSES
IN THE CITY OF EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, will meet at the Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street on
September 18, 1989 at 7:00 p.m., for the purpose of holding a public hearing on
the proposed vacation of the following easement for drainage and utility purposes:
(Same as legal description of vacation in paragraph 1. above)
All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not
the above proposed street vacation is in the public interest and should be made
shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the extent to
which such proposed street vacation affects existing easements within the area of
the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority
of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric,
telephone, or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water
pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to
continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion
thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto,
for the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to
which any or all of any such easements, and such authority to maintain, and to
enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL
Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL'S FOCUS SHIFT TO EDUCATION NOTED Member Kelly reported that
she had attended an AMM Metropolitan Agencies Committee meeting recently at which
the Metropolitan Council presented their program for the coming year. She said
they are shifting their focus to some new issues, e.g. education, equal
opportunity, life long learning and special education. She said she was concerned
about the Metropolitan Council getting into these areas and that this may warrant
Edina's Council sitting down with the Edina School Board as this will impact both.
MLC DISCUSSES TAX PROGRAM Manager Rosland reported that the Municipal Legislative
Commission (MLC) has been meeting regarding the Governor's tax program. Although
not funded as the MLC has proposed, it does parallel some of the features of the
MLC's proposal on taxes. However, because the DFL leaders and the Governor do not.
see eye to eye, the Governor's program will probably not be effective. If a
special session of the legislature is called, it will not be until the end of
September.
LETTERS OF COMMENDATION NOTED Member Rice referred to letters from residents
commending various staff personnel for services. He asked if letters of complaint
concerning staff are received. Manager Rosland said that all letters from
residents addressed to the Mayor or Council are copied for the Council packets.
STREET PARKING REGULATIONS AND STREET SWEEPING QUESTIONED Member Rice said he has
noted more cars parked over night on the streets and asked what the regulations
were. Chief Swanson.said there is a basic six hour street parking ordinance for
the non - winter seasons. He explained that the Police Department acts on a
complaint basis only. Member Rice commented that he felt the parking regulations
should be enforced.
Member Rice asked if street sweeping is being done as frequently as it has been in
the past. Engineer Hoffman replied that it is.
WOODDALEJ EST 50TH STREET INTERSECTION DISCUSSED Member Rice said he had heard a
concern from a resident who was traveling north on Wooddale Avenue about turning
west onto West 50th Street and being confused resulting in entering the eastbound
lane. He asked that this be looked at.
LETTER OF MARJORIE LOPA CONCERNING GOLF LEAGUE POLICY DISCIISSED Member Kelly
referred to the letter from Marjorie Lopa of the Bowling Green Golf League
concerning the golf league policy that will be put into effect in 1990 that all
leagues at Braemar may consist of Edina residents only. She said that she has
received several telephone calls on this subject. Member Smith commented that the
affected league members would like to speak to the issue that they be
grandfathered in under the new rules but have expressed that they would feel
somewhat intimidated in presenting their views at a Council meeting. He said we
should be able to facilitate their comfort here.
COUNCIL STUDY SESSION AGENDA FOR 9116/89 DISCIISSED Manager Rosland reminded the
Council Members of the Council Study Session scheduled for September 16. Mayor
Richards asked that the Members contact him with suggestions for that agenda.
There was some discussion about cancelling the session and it was agreed that a
decision would be made at the next meeting.
REPORT ON ENTERPRISE FUNDS TO BE SUMMARIZED Following some discussion as to the
content and format of the report on enterprise funds, it was agreed that it should
be revised and put into a management summary format and then brought back for the
Council's review.
CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly to
approve payment of the following claims as per pre -list dated 8/21/89: General
Fund $278,582.49, C.D.B.G. $11,202.00, Communications $123.64, Art Center
$12,944.17, Capital Fund $180.40, Swimming Pool Fund $2,786.91, Golf Course Fund
$26,889.31, Recreation Center Fund $3,518.87, Gun Range Fund $544.47, Edinborough
Park $8,264.69, Utility Fund $16,068.67, Storm Sewer Utility $1,680.00, Liquor
Dispensary Fund $110,630.06, Construction Fund $363,251.44, IMP Bond Redemption #2
$717.25, Total $837,474.37, and for confirmation of payment of Claims dated
8/31/89: General Fund $293,799.41, C.D.B.G. $8,781.00, Communications $3,666.59,
Art Center $646.07, Swimming Pool Fund $1,155.45, Golf Course Fund $56,024.88,
Recreation Center Fund $7,286.73, Gun Range Fund $237.72, Edinborough Park
$8,391.72, Utility Fund $34,359.44, Liquor Dispensary Fund $203,061.41,
Construction Fund $34,760.32, Total $652,170.73
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the
meeting adjourned at 8:45 p.m.
City Clerk
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED ON ACCOUNT
OF VARIOUS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows:
1. The City has given notice of hearings as required by law on the proposed
assessment rolls for the improvements hereinafter referred to, and at such
hearings held on September 18, 1989, has considered all oral and written
objections presented against the levy of such assessments.
2. Each of the assessments as set forth in the assessment rolls on file in the
office of the City Clerk for the following improvements:
Parking Ramp Improvement No. P -1B
Street Improvement No. BA -281A
Watermain Improvement No. WM -363
Storm Sewer Improvement No. STS -185
Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS -377
Watermain Improvement No. WM -364
Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS -378
Storm Sewer Improvement No. STS -186
Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS -379
Watermain Improvement No. WM -365
Sanitary Sewer Connection No. HC -11
Maintenance Improvement No. M -89
Tree Removal-Improvement No. TR -89
Aquatic_ Weeds Improvement No. AQ -89
Tree Trimming Improvement No. TT -89
Re- assessment of Special Assessments on
Lot 23, Auditor's Subdivision No. 196
Tax Forfeited Land (Part of
does not exceed the local benefits conferred by said improvements upon the lot,
tract or parcel of land so assessed, and'all of said assessments are hereby
adopted and confirmed as the proper assessments on account of said respective
improvements to be spread against the benefitted lots, parcels and tracts of land
described therein.
3. The assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments, the first of
said installments, together with interest at a rate of 9.0% per annum, except that
interest for Re- assessment of Special Assessments on Tax Forfeited Land (Part of
Lot 23, Auditor's Subdivision No. 196) shall be at a rate of 11.5% per annum, on
the entire assessment from the date hereof to December 31, 1990, to be payable
with the general taxes for the year 1990. To each subsequent installment shall be
added interest at the above rate for one year on all then unpaid installments.
The number, of such annual installments shall be as follows:
Name of Improvement Number of Installments
PARKING RAMP IMPROVEMENT NO. P -1B (Levy No. 11541) 20 years
STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -281A (Levy No. 11540) 10 years
WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -363 (Levy No. 11534) 10 years
STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO.. STS -185 (Levy No. 11538) 10 years
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -377 (Levy No. 11536) 10 years
WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -364 (Levy No. 11535) 10 years
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -378 (Levy No. 11537) 10 years
STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. STS -186 (Levy No. 11539 10 years
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -379 (Levy No. 11559) 10 years
WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -365 (Levy No. 11558) 10 years
SANITARY SEWER HOUSE CONNECTION NO. HC -11 (Levy No. 11533) 6 years
MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. M -89 (Levy No. 11527) 1 year
TREE REMOVAL PROJECT NO. TR -89 (Levy No. 11531) 3 years
(Levy No. 11532) 5 years
AQUATIC WEED IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ -89 (Levy No. 11530) 1 year
TREE TRIMMING IMPROVEMENT NO. TT -89 (Levy No. 11551) 1 year
TAX FORFEIT LAND RE- ASSESSMENT (Part of Lot 23, Auditor's 3 years
Subdivision No. 196 (06- 116 -21 -21 -0006)
(Levy No. 11585)
4. The City Clerk shall forthwith prepare and transmit to the County Auditor a
copy of this resolution and a certified duplicate of said assessments with each
then unpaid installment and interest set forth separately, to be extended on the
tax lists of the County in accordance with this resolution.
5. The City Clerk shall also mail notice of any special assessment which may be
payable by a county, by a political subdivision, or by the owner of any
right -of -way as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.061, Subdivision 4,
and if any such assessment is not paid in a single installment, the City Treasurer
shall arrange for collection thereof in installments, as set forth in said
Section.
ADOPTED this 18th day of September, 1989.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do
hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct
copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular
Meeting of September 18, 1989 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular
Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 2nd day of October, 1989.
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
-2-
CITY OF EDINA
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT
III. A.
COUNTY NO. P -1B
LEVY NO. 11541
FOR: PARKING RAMP IMPROVEMENT NO. P -1B.
LOCATION; West 51st Street Parking Ramp.
CONTRACTOR: City of Edina HRA $240,000.00
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST., $240,000.00
. . . .............
ASSESSABLE UNITS: 1 ASSESSABLE UNIT.
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT: $240,000.00
COUNTY CHARGE: 1 Unit @ 20 years # $1.00 1 nn
$240,001.00
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH TAXES DUE IN 1990.
FIRST YEAR INTEREST FIGURED AT 9.0% OF TOTAL PRINCIPLE x 1.28493,YEARS.
a-
III. B.
CITY OF EDINA
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT
COUNTY NO. BA -281A
FOR: STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -281A. LEVY N0. 11540
LOCATION: Malibu.Drive from Lincoln Drive to 655 feet Southeasterly.
CONTRACTOR: 'Annandale Contracting, Inc. $19,372.30
ENGINEERING AND CLERICAL: 12% 2,324.68
$21,696.98
PUBLISHING AND SUPPLIES: 35.00
CAPITALIZED INTEREST AT 9.0%
FROM: November 21, 1988
TO: September 18, 1989
301 days at $5.36 per day $ 1,617.45
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST: $23,349.43
ASSESSABLE UNITS: 1,052.25 ASSESSABLE FEET.
'ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT: $26.35 PER ASSESSABLE FOOT.
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT: $22.19 PER ASSESSABLE FOOT.
ASSESSABLE COST: $23,349.43
COUNTY CHARGE: 2.00
$23,351.43
TO BE SPREAD OVER 10 YEARS - 1990 THROUGH 1999.
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH TAXES DUE IN 1990
FIRST YEAR INTEREST FIGURED AT 9.0% OF TOTAL PRINCIPLE x 1.28493 YEARS.
III. C.
CITY OF EDINA
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT
COUNTY NO. WM -363
LEVY NO.11534
FOR: WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -363.
LOCATION: Malibu Drive from Lincoln Drive to 710 feet southeasterly.
CONTRACTOR: Annandale Contracting, Inc. $25,110.90
ENGINEERING AND CLERICAL: 11% 2,762.20
$27,873.10
PUBLISHING AND SUPPLIES: 5n-on
CAPITALIZED INTEREST AT 9.0%
FROM: November 21, 1988
TO: September 18, 1989
301 days at $6.89 per day
LESS AMOUNT PAID BY UTILITY FUND:
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST:
ASSESSABLE UNITS: 5 ASSESSABLE LOTS.
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT: $5,773.72 PER ASSESSABLE LOT.
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT: $4,247.83 PER ASSESSABLE LOT.
ASSESSABLE COST:
COUNTY CHARGE:
.PL/ , 7LJ . 1 V
$ 2,072.45
$29,995.55
--$ 8,756.40
$21,239.15
$21,239.15
41- , L -1 . V J
TO BE SPREAD OVER 10 YEARS 1990 THROUGH 1999.
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH TAXES DUE IN 1990.
FIRST YEAR INTEREST FIGURED AT 9.0% OF TOTAL PRINCIPLE x 1.28493 YEARS.
III. D.
CITY OF EDINA
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT
COUNTY NO'. ST.S -185-
LEVY NO. 11538
FOR: STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S -185.
LOCATION: Malibu Drive from Lincoln Drive to 290 feet Southeasterly.
CONTRACTOR: Annandale Contracting, Inc. $12,422.50
ENGINEERING AND CLERICAL: 12% 1,465.50
$13,888.00
PUBLISHING AND SUPPLIES: 35.00
$13,923.00
CAPITALIZED INTEREST AT 9.0%
FROM: November 21, 1988
TO: September 18, 1989
301 days at $3.43 per day $ 1,032.98
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . $14,955.98
ASSESSABLE UNITS: 140,300 ASSESSABLE, SQUARE FEET.
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT: $0.126 PER ASSESSABLE SQUARE FOOT.
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT: $0.1066 PER ASSESSABLE SQUARE FOOT,
ASSESSABLE COST:
COUNTY CHARGE:
$14,955.98
1 _^
�14,9bb.9d
TO BE SPREAD OVER 10 YEARS -.1990 THROUGH 1999.
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH TAXES DUE IN 1990.
FIRST YEAR INTEREST FIGURED AT 9.0% OF TOTAL PRINCIPLE x 1.28493 YEARS.
CITY OF EDINA
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT
III. E.
COUNTY NO. SS -377
LEVY NO. 11536
FOR: SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -377.
LOCATION: Malibu Drive from Lincoln Drive to 710 feet Southeasterly.
CONTRACTOR: Annandale Contracting, Inc. $24,6.41.76
ENGINEERING AND CLERICAL: 12% 2,957.01
$27,598.77
PUBLISHING AND SUPPLIES: 50.00
�L /,b4d.
CAPITALIZED INTEREST AT 9.0%
FROM: November 21, 1988
TO: September 18, 1989
301 days at $6.82 per day. 2,052.08
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST: $29,700.85
ASSESSABLE UNITS: 5 ASSESSABLE LOTS
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT: $7,132.73 PER ASSESSABLE LOT.
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT:. $59,940.17 PER ASSESSABLE LOT.
ASSESSABLE COST: $29,700.85
COUNTY CHARGE: 2.50
$29,703.35
TO BE SPREAD OVER 10 YEARS - 1990 THROUGH 1999.
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH TAXES DUE IN 1990,
FIRST YEAR INTEREST FIGURED AT 9.0% OF TOTAL PRINCIPLE x 1.28493 YEARS.
. CITY OF EDINA
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT
III. F.
COUNTY NO. WM -364
LEVY NO. 11535
FOR: - WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -364.
,LOCATION: Ryan Avenue from West 62nd Street to West 63rd Street.
CONTRACTOR: Annandale Contracting, Inc. $8,773.28
ENGINEERING AND CLERICAL: 12% 1,052.79
$9,826.07
PUBLISHING AND SUPPLIES: 25.00
$9,851.07
CAPITALIZED INTEREST AT 9.0%
FROM:. December 19, 1988
TO: September 18, 1989
273 days at $2.43 per. day. $ 663.12
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $10,514.19
ASSESSABLE UNITS: 3 ASSESSABLE LOTS.
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT: $4,736.70 PER ASSESSABLE LOT.
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT: $3,504.73 PER ASSESSABLE LOT.
ASSESSABLE COST: $10,514.19
COUNTY CHARGE: 1 rn
$10,515.69
TO BE SPREAD OVER 10 YEARS - 1990 THROUGH 1999.
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH TAXES DUE IN 1990.
FIRST YEAR INTEREST FIGURED AT 9.0% OF TOTAL PRINCIPLE x 1.28493 YEARS.
III. G.
CITY OF EDINA
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT
COUNTY NO. SS -378
LEVY NO. 11537
FOR: SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -378.
LOCATION: Ryan Avenue from West 62nd Street to West 63rd Street.
CONTRACTOR: Annandale Contracting, Inc. $14,366.72
ENGINEERING AND CLERICAL: 12% 1,724.01
$16,090.73
PUBLISHING AND SUPPLIES: 35.00
$16,125.73
CAPITALIZED INTEREST AT 9.0%
FROM: December 19, 1988
TO: September 18, 1989
273 days at $3.98 per day 1,085.51
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST: $17,211.24
ASSESSABLE UNITS: 3 ASSESSABLE LOTS.
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT: $5,666.10 PER-ASSESSABLE LOT.,
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT: $5,737.08 PER ASSESSABLE LOT.
ASSESSABLE COST: $17,211.24
COUNTY CHARGE: 1.50
$17,212.74
TO BE SPREAD OVER 10 YEARS - 1990 THROUGH 1999.
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH TAXES DUE IN 1990.
FIRST YEAR INTEREST FIGURED AT 9.0% of TOTAL PRINCIPLE x 1.28493 YEARS.
III. H.
CITY OF EDINA
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT
COUNTY NO. ST.S -186
LEVY NO. 11539
FOR: STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S -186.
LOCATION: Minnesota Drive from France Avenue to Edinborough Way.
CONTRACTOR: Annandale Contracting, Inc $54,046.31
ENGINEERING AND CLERICAL: 1 0% 5,404.63
$59,450.94
PUBLISHING AND SUPPLIES: 75.00
CAPITALIZED INTEREST AT 9.0%
FROM: November 21., 1988
TO: September 18, 1989
301 days at $14.68 per day. $ 4,459.00
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST . . . . . . . . . . . . $63,984.94
ASSESSABLE UNITS: 2,139,965 ASSESSABLE SQUARE FEET.
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT: $0.0331 PER ASSESSABLE SQUARE FOOT.
..PROPOSED ASSESSMENT: $0.0299 PER ASSESSABLE SQUARE FOOT.
ASSESSABLE COST: $63,984.94
COUNTY CHARGE: 4.00
$63,998.94
TO BE SPREAD OVER 10 YEARS - 1990 THROUGH 1999.
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH TAXES DUE IN 1990.
FIRST YEAR INTEREST FIGURED AT 9.0% OF TOTAL PRINCIPLE x 1.28493 YEARS.
CITY OF EDINA
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT
III. I.
COUNTY NO. SS -379
LEVY NO. 11559
FOR: SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -379.
LOCATION: Minnesota Drive from France Avenue to Edinborough Way.
CONTRACTOR: Annandale Contracting, Inc. $16,237.20
ENGINEERING AND CLERICAL: 1 2% 1,948.46
$18,185.66
PUBLISHING AND SUPPLIES: 35.00
$18,220.66
CAPITALIZED INTEREST AT 9.0%
FROM: November 21, 1988
TO: September 18, 1989
301 days at $4.49 per day. $ 1,467.02
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $19,687.68
ASSESSABLE UNITS: 2,139,965 ASSESSABLE SQUARE FEET.
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT: $0.01093 PER ASSESSABLE SQUARE ,FOOT.
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT: $0.0092 PER ASSESSABLE SQUARE FOOT.
ASSESSABLE COST:
COUNTY CHARGE:
$19,687.68
A' I1n
�lV,byl.bd
TO BE SPREAD OVER 10 YEARS - 1990 THROUGH 1999.
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH TAXES DUE IN 1990.
FIRST YEAR INTEREST FIGURED AT 9.0% OF TOTAL PRINCIPLE x 1.28493 YEARS.
CITY OF EDINA
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT
FOR: WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO.
LOCATION: Minnesota Drive from
CONTRACTOR: Annandale Contract
ENGINEERING AND CLERICAL: 11%
PUBLISHING AND SUPPLIES:
III. J.
COUNTY NO. WM -365
LEVY NO. 11558
WM -3 65.
France Avenue to Edinborough Way.
ing, Inc. $34,153.10
3,756.84
$37,909.94
50.00
.Pj/ , 7j y. y-+
CAPITALIZED INTEREST AT 9.0%
FROM: November 21, 1988
TO: September 18, 1989
301 days at $9.36 per day $ 2,827.78
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $40,787.72
ASSESSABLE UNITS: 2,139,965 ASSESSABLE SQUARE FEET.
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT: $0.02116 PER ASSESSABLE SQUARE FOOT.
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT: $0.01906 PER ASSESSABLE SQUARE FOOT.
ASSESSABLE COST: $40,787.72
COUNTY CHARGE: 4.00
$40,791.00
TO BE SPREAD OVER 1.0 YEARS - 1990 THROUGH 1999.
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH TAXES DUE IN 1990.
FIRST YEAR INTEREST FIGURED AT 9.0% OF TOTAL PRINCIPLE x 1.28493 YEARS.
CITY OF EDINA
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT
III. K.
COUNTY' NO.' HC -11
LEVY NO. 11533
FOR: SANITARY SEWER HOUSE CONNECTION.NO. HC -11.
LOCATION: 4540 France Avenue South
CONTRACTOR: Backdahl and Olson $6,200.00
PUBLISHING AND SUPPLIES: 15.00
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST . . . . . . . . P . . . . $6,215.00
ASSESSABLE UNITS: 1 ASSESSABLE LOT.
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT: $6,215.00
ASSESSABLE COST: $6,215.00
COUNTY CHARGE: 1 parcel @ $0.30 .30
$6,215.30
TO BE SPREAD OVER 6 YEARS - 1990 THROUGH 1995.
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH TAXES DUE IN 1990.
FIRST YEAR INTEREST FIGURED AT 9.0% OF TOTAL PRINCIPLE x 1.28493.
CITY OF EDINA
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT
III. L.
COUNTY NO. M -89
LEVY NO. 11527
FOR: MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. M -89.
LOCATION: 50th Street and France Avenue Business District.
CONTRACTOR: City of Edina
Payroll - Ed Lancello $27,092.94
Public Works Crew 2,597.59
Extra Summer Help 4,265.70
$33,956.23
CONTRACTED SERVICES:
Mileage - Ed Lancello $ 200.97
Contract - Sidewalks 346.00 $ 546.97
COMMODITIES: Repair parts $3702.92
General supplies 4852.95 $ 8,555.87
$43,059.07
PUBLISHING AND SUPPLIES: 62.64
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST . . . . . . . . $43,121.71
ASSESSABLE UNITS: 309,560 ASSESSABLE SQUARE FEET.
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT:. $0.1393
ASSESSABLE COST: $43,121.71
COUNTY CHARGE: 1.45
$43,123.16
TO BE ALLOCATED TO TAXES DUE AND PAYABLE IN 1990.
FIRST YEAR INTEREST FIGURED AT 9.0% OF TOTAL PRINCIPLE x 1.28493 YEARS.
III. M.
CITY OF EDINA
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT
COUNTY NO'. TR -89
LEVY NO. 11531 (3 yr)
11532 (5 yr)
FOR: TREE REMOVAL PROJECT N0: TR -89.
LOCATION: 5200 Valley View Road
4810 Brookside Avenue
TOTAL COST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $804.22
ASSESSABLE UNITS: 2 ASSESSABLE LOTS.
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT: $155.42 (5200 Valley View Road)
.648.80 (4810 Brookside Avenue)
ASSESSABLE COST: $804.22
COUNTY CHARGE: 1 Unit @ 3 years $0.15
1 Unit @ 5 years = $0.25 .40
$804.62
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE.WITH TAXES DUE IN 1990.
FIRST YEAR INTEREST FIGURED AT 9.0% OF TOTAL PRINCIPLE x 1.28493 YEARS.
9
CITY OF EDINA
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT
III. N.
COUNTY NO. AQ -89.
LEVY NO. 11530
FOR: AQUATIC WEED IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ -89.
LOCATION: Indianhead Lake
CONTRACTORS: Clean Flo Labs, Midwest Aqua Care, $10,651.00
Testing, Permits.
TOTAL COST . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $10,651.00
ASSESSABLE UNITS: 33 Homes.
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT: $322.76 PER HOME.
LOCATION: Mill Pond
CONTRACTOR: Midwest Aqua Care, Testing, Permits $ 8,768.00
LESS CITY OF EDINA SHARE: 1,500.00
TOTAL COST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7,268.00
ASSESSABLE UNITS: 63 Homes.
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT: $115.37 PER HOME
TO BE'ALLOCATED TO TAXES DUE AND PAYABLE IN 1990.
FIRST YEAR INTEREST FIGURED AT 9.0% OF TOTAL PRINCIPLE x 1.28493.
III. 0.
CITY OF EDINA
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT
COUNTY NO. TT -89
LEVY NO. 11551
FOR: TREE TRIMMING IMPROVEMENT NO. TT -89.
LOCATION: Area bounded by Highway 169 on the West, Highway 100
on the East, Highway 62 on the North and the Southern
City Boundary Line on the South.
CONTRACTED SERVICES:
Tree Trimmers Contract and City Forester $37,192.20
Secretarial 4,929.36
Project evaluation 1,320.75
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $43,442.31
ASSESSABLE UNITS: 827 TREES TRIMMED.
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT: $52.53 PER ASSESSABLE TREE.
ASSESSALE COST: $43,442.31
COUNTY CHARGE: 308 parcels @ $0.05 15.40
$43,457.71
TO BE ALLOCATED TO TAXES DUE AND PAYABLE IN 1990.
FIRST YEAR INTEREST FIGURED AT 9.0% OF TOTAL PRINCIPLE x 1.28493 _YEARS.
CITY OF EDINA
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT
III. P.
. COUNTY NO. TF -89
LEVY NO. 11585
FOR: TAX FORFEIT LAND RE- ASSESSMENT.
LOCATION: Land parcel only. (06- 116 -21 -21 -0006)
Part of Lot 23, Auditor's Subdivision No. 196.
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE RE- ASSESSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . $7,960.49
$52,060.49 = pay off balance at time of foreclosure,
including unpaid installments with
penalties + interest.
44,100.00 = 90% of sale price paid towards specials.
$ 7,960.49 Tax forfeit land re- assessment @ 11.5%
levied over 3 years(rate and duration of
original assessment.
Note: property sold @ $49,000/10% do/10 yr contract.
1 /10 (44,100.00)+ interest given to City in
settlement statement yearly for 10 years.
ASSESSABLE COST:
COUNTY CHARGE: 1 parcel @ $0.15
TO BE SPREAD OVER 3 YEARS - 1990 THROUGH 1992.
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH TAXES DUE IN 1990.
$7,960.49
.15
$7,960.64
September 18, 1989
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
City of Edina
Edina, MN
Re: Appeal, Tree Trimming
This letter is to serve as my written objection to the charge of $105.06
for the trimming of two trees on my property at 6312::_ Warren Avenue, Edina,
MN 55435.
I will agree to pay for one tree, but not two. The tree in question can
be observed at the above address, or I will be happy to present a photo.
I also object to the way in which this tree trimming is handled, in that
if the homeowner is not at home at the time the work is done, the homeowner
has no way of knowing.that said work has been completed. I was left with
no card or notification of any kind that tree trimming had been done and
was not aware that it had indeed been accomplished until I received the
billing for it (copy enclosed).
Please keep me informed of any further proceedings.
Thank you,
Nancy E. Johnson
Homeowner
o e
To (n
• ,NQJAPO�`tbO •
INS
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Kenneth Rosland
From: Craig Larsen
Date: September 18, 1989
Subject: C -89 -2, Conditional
Use Permit, Grace Church
5300 France Avenue So.
Agenda Item #
1V.
A.
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Ul
To Council
Action
0
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Approval of the Conditional Use Permit subject to immediate installation of berming
along the west property line and sound baffles on air conditioner and subject to
review and approval by City Engineer of any further changes in grading plan.
Also conditioned upon receipt of an executed Proof of Parking Agreement prior
to receiving a building permit for the remodeling.
Info /Background:
Attached is a letter from the church architect detailing events that have
occurred since the initial Council meeting on the Grace Church proposal.
Representatives of the ehurch have met with neighbors and have proposed
1 to address the storm water and noise problems this fall.
At the September 7, 1989, Board of Appeals meeting the church presented
plans for a revised front entry vestibule (BOA minutes and graphics are
attached). The Board unanimously approved the 15 foot setback variance
for the redesigned entry.
SCH WAR Z/
.3952 LOUISIANA AVENUE
September 12, 1989
Mr. Craig Larsen.
City of Edina
4801 - 50th Street
Edina, MN 55436
WEBER AR
SOUTH • MINNEAPOLIS
Re: Conditional Use Permit - Grace Church of Edina
C H I T E C T S
• MINNESOTA • 55426
(612) 926 -1156
Grace Church appeared at public hearing before the Edina City Council on
July 24, 1989. At this meeting the Church was instructed to redesign the
proposed France Avenue entrance in accord with the recommendations of the
Planning Commission and to respond to the concerns of two neighbors re-
garding problems with noise and stormwater before coming before the Council
for action on the Conditional Use Permit.
The Conditional Use permit will now be before the Council for action on
September 18. The purpose of this letter is to summarize the actions of
Grace Church with respect to the issues above.
1. France Avenue Entrance
The entrance canopy has been redesigned and relocated as requested by the
Planning Commission. The France Avenue face of the supporting piers for
the canopy correspond with the faces of the existing building fin walls. _
The redesigned entrance was reviewed on September 7 by the Board of Appeals
and approved unanimously..
2. H.V.A.C. Noise
Mrs. Donna Bahn, 5241 Halifax appeared before the council and also had
written a letter expressing concern about noise from the roof -top H.V.A.C.
unit located on the building near their rear yard. This is the north-
westerly -most unit on the building. It serves the west office suite and
activities wing and runs a significant percentage of the time.
Attached is a proposal from Allen Mechanical for installation of sound
baffles on the condensing unit discharge ports of this unit. The Church
intends to proceed with this work upon review by the Bahns.
3. Stormwater
Mrs. Mary Thatcher, 5309 Halifax, appeared before the council and also had
written a letter indicating that in heavy rain conditions water overwhelms
- the catch basin in the Church parking lot adjacent to their rear yard.
The problem is aggrevated when debris blocks the cover of the catch basin.
RICHARD J SCHWARZ NEIL WEBER 0 1 AND RE LATONDR•ESSE
i
Mr. Craig Larsen
September 12, 1989
Page Two
The Church became aware of this problem when Mrs. Thatcher appeared at the
neighborhood meeting held by the church in July. At that time the Church
ordered a new "beehive" type cover for the catch basin. This cover is now
in place.
In addition, the low point along the west property line of the church
corresponds with Thatchers property. The Church intends to raise this low
point one foot by means of an earth and timber berm. This berm is shown
on the enclosed site plan (Proposed Parking Plan 9/5/89). The top of berm
would run level at an elevation one foot above the current spill line. The
length of the berm would be as required for existing grade to match the top
of berm (approximately 240').
It would be the intention of the church to, do this work as soon as possible
this fall in conjunction with installation of the newly alligned west curb
of the parking lot from behind the Church to 54th Street.
Conclusion
The Church is making every effort to be sensitive to the needs of its neigh-
bors. The conditional use process has served to make it aware of a need to
improve its communication with its neighbors.
In particular the Church has taken great care to see that the modifications
proposed under this Conditional Use Application will result in a considera-
ble improvement to the appearance of the church and its impact on its neigh-
bors.
In light of this we believe that approval of this permit is in order and
will have positive results for the Church, its neighbors and the City of
Edina.
Sincerely,
SCHWARZ /WEBER ARCHITECTS, INC.
J. Andre LaTondresse
JAL /mm
5 September 1989
DICK LUNDBORG
6704 Dover Drive
Edina, MN 55436
SUBJECT: GRACE CHURCH
Dear Mr. Lundborg;
We propose the following for a cost not to exceed:
ONE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS -------------- - - - - -- $1,100.00
Includes:
One twenty four inch high galvanized metal panel lined with one
inch matted fiberglass insulation and covered with one half inch
bird screen. The panels are to be placed on top of the carrier
.roof top unit next to the chapel, extending up on the south,
north and west side of the condensor section with onedivider
piece down the middle.
-No painting is included.
If you have any further questions please feel free to call me.
Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
ALLAN MECHANICAL, INC.
4f /� tQ
E1mer�D�We -�e��
Project Manager
EDW /mta
cc: Schwartz Weber Architects
Jim Beckwith, Kraus Anderson
allan mechanical, inc.
6020 culligan way
�i
� �iArls�V�'S
I
I
V f ILT scat, �►sc,�s
p�5 �i�+ cornrr�so�
N Cv
0 JAS VN it
AGE CHoRCN "fwTaf UOtr
z
z
i
cc
LLI
ca
a
z
z
3
ac
IA Co FA,04
—�_—,nM-ftS-jL -niFla e V-04. JIMMt
-Top op or-pol
I'l I I 11.11.11.1111 ,
Q a
a�^
B -89 -16 Grace Church
5300 France Avenue South
Request: A 15 foot front yard setback variance to allow an entry
canopy to line up with the existing building which is closer
to France Avenue than the current building setback
requirement
Mr. Dommer informed the Board Grace Church is currently seeking a Conditional
Use Permit for expansion of the church. The Conditional Use Permit has already
been reviewed by the Planning Commission and the City Council. The City Council
has tabled the issue and will not act on the Conditional Use Permit unless an
entry revision is presented. The Conditional Use Permit process does not have a
variance mechanism, therefore, the Board is to review the proposal and their
findings will be presented to the City Council who will act on the Conditional
Use Permit request.
Mr. Dommer explained the front yard setback requirement at the site is 50 feet
from France Avenue. Originally, while before the Planning Commission, the
Church proposed a two foot setback. The Planning Commission suggested redesign
and therefore the church has presented the plan before you this evening.
Mr. Dommer pointed out the current proposal illustrates a 35 foot setback to an
open canopy with roof. This is the setback of the existing church. The
proposal preserves the open front streetscape and responds to the concerns of
the Planning Commission.
Mr. Dommer concluded staff recommends approval as presented subject to
Conditional Use Permit Approval
Mr. Andre Latrondrese, representative for Grace Church was present.
Mr. Latrondrese told the Board he was asked to design a front entry for Grace
Church that would help the church in creating a "more church like front door ".
With graphics Mr. Latrondrese pointed out the design change made to the front
entry canopy to meet the churches 35 foot front yard setback as was requested by
the Planning Commission. Mr. Latrondrese said the new front entry canopy now
lines up with the rest of the church and maintains the 35 foot front yard
setback.
Mr. Olson asked Mr. Latrondrese if the bell tower would be removed. Mr.
Latrondrese said the bell tower will be removed.
The Board was in agreement that the proposed entry canopy is an improvement over
what is currently there. The design change to meet the 35 foot front yard
setback has been accomplished and therefore the variance request meets with
Board approval.
Mrs. Utne moved for variance approval subject to the staff condition that the
Conditional Use Permit is approved by the City Council. Mr. Bentley seconded
the motion. Ayes; Runyan, Bentley, Olson, Hale, Utne. Motion carried.
it
_i�M 1,� 't`j�^ gyp: t Sl�►ai _' r1
al
FRANCE AVENUE ENTRANCE ^FACILITIES RENEWAL_ STUDY-
.•I
ENTRANCE _ -SIDE ELEVATION
PROPOSED ENTRANCE CANOPY
M ELEVATION ,
FACILITIES RENEW AL_ STOY '
A.
e`
Cn
v � �o
e ,�bNPON`S�O •
lase
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Kenneth Rosland
From: Craig Larsen
Date: September 18, 1989
Subject: Release of Proof of
Parking Agreements for
One Corporate Center
Phases 5 and 6
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
Iv.
B.
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
0
To Council
Action
0
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Approve release of Proof of Parking Agreements for One Corporate Center,
Phases 5 and 6.
Info /Background:
The Planning Commission considered and recommended release of the agreements
at its August 30, 1989, meeting.
Since this project was developed-in 1981 -1982, parking requirements for large
office complexes have been reduced. The result in this case is that existing
parking, on -site, exceeds our current Ordinance requirement. Thus, the
Proof of Parking Agreement is no longer needed. Release of the agreements
will facilitate the sale and financing of the buildings.
.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
HELD ON WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 30, 1989, AT 7:30 P.M.
EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair, Gordon Johnson, Helen McClelland, David Runyan, Nan
Faust, Robert Hale, John Bailey, John Palmer, Geoff
Vorkinger, Virginia Shaw
MEMBERS ABSENT: Lee Johnson
STAFF PRESENT: Philip S. Dommer, Senior Planner
Jackie Hoogenakker, Secretary
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES:
Commissioner Palmer moved for approval of the July 5, 1989 Community
Development and Planning Commission Minutes. Commissioner Shaw seconded the
motion. All voted aye. Motion carried.
II. NEV BUSINESS:
One Corporate Center Phases 5 and 6 Proof of Parking Agreements
Mr. Dommer presented his staff report noting in an effort to simplify the sale
and financing of the properties, Ryan has asked the City to release the Proof of
Parking agreements.
Mr. Dommer concluded that staff supports the proposed release of the Proof of
Parking agreements. He pointed out the development, as constructed, exceeds
current parking requirements.
Mrs. McClelland asked Mr. Dommer if any of the parking sites involved in the
Proof of Parking Agreement were striped as compact spaces.. Mr. Dommer said all
the parking spaces are standard size.
Mr. Workinger expressed uncertainty in releasing the Proof of Parking Agreement.
Mr. Dommer explained that the release of the Proof of Parking Agreement is a
technicality due to the fact that when the development occurred the City did not
have a-Planned Office District in the Zoning Ordinance. Therefore, they did not
have a guideline on how to allot the correct amount of spaces. Mr. Dommer
pointed out, at present, the development exceeds the Ordinance's parking
requirements.
Commissioner Hale moved to recommend approval for the release of the Proof of
Parking Agreement. Commissioner McClelland seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Motion carried.
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: August 23, 1989
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Craig Larsen
SUBJECT: One Corporate Center Phases 5 and 6 Proof of Parking Agreements
The subject property measures 12.8 acres and is developed with 14 office
buildings containing 280,319 square feet of floor area.
The project was developed by Ryan Construction Company in 1982. The development
required numerous variances because, at the time, we did not have a Planned
Office District in the Zoning Ordinance. One of the variances granted was for
parking quantity. The development required 742 spaces, but the developer
proposed constructing 642 spaces. The plan was approved. at 642 spaces with a
Proof of Parking agreement illustrating the required 724 spaces. In 1984 we
adopted a new Zoning Ordinance which reduced parking requirements for larger
office building developments. The revised ordinance requires 632 spaces for
this development. A recent as -built survey indicates the development has 645
spaces, or 13 spaces more than currently required.
In an effort to simplify the sale and financing of the properties, Ryan has
asked the City to release the Proof of Parking agreements. A copy of the
release is attached.
Recommendation
Staff supports the proposed release of the Proof of Parking agreements. The
development, as constructed, exceeds current parking requirements. Staff has
not observed or received complaints of parking shortages. In addition, it
appears that we would not be able to legally require the construction of parking
in excess of current ordinance requirements.
` ( NUHMANUALL Ii U. 1 - = "- :i: /' /.h413. -� jig
STATE 1 •�' M� ��. V
j ° l Q 1-. D z015195 -
o,l .. ••. +: cal , , o �• - '
Cl i op 01157. i �' _ A�Doa.No.�OI�eb2 1 ;� Rj ` °� •, Doc.3b�:51C
jot %, ,31,,�f I IOI. /•' ._..... / _ _ _
•h ) .� ' vu :000b,/s - - - -ol/u��1• S - ..E .�.... Is76/... �f7�,i e•+iti r {• ,
S li 2 to 1, •• ooe. w 1 1 0„ ��
4 21.11 , Ire ,J a .•,y 258.29 j ;6.29 4'281!.66` ►-'`�, �:• ONE
' 70 51.35'10 -E Y
C 0 R
Mfr I/ ° r• 5,1�'b. r , . �'w W ow . 1 ' �•"^" �1e 0. 1
set/ i4,
ow-
`Y .I I'�; f t� b �'� .yam p a R Q� A
3 a m = {k n
'•r•. ° °• ,e t I7 M�i 4 .'• 4 I•• (. •
+f , I.' —1LeG 1 lilt O V, cJ•�(9 ''',
f
O.L. oe a 511 No2A11/ No 1 IEQ P wt ;.�' r, jo
W 1 ,:� ;' 4 •.y:r. \y
a N02331ts U S r lLtl.__ ---_ --
01 .' - 1 � /'; IIt sl - _ y 351.88 O.O/ y so•rcu c .1i1'
'^ 416 N030006 /61.d6 ' -' so. /!r„ °.'�J . ee • .:. J
' +•'•
id
Li 11 1; (METRO BLVD.) FRONTAGE RD. 1 I f _- ( I /i•.
"'� 10.71 -n'w F ;11��• ,v 95.51 7141 ,p w• Ni_. _ —..._ w /f •,
�"'t b ioJf( run \ CO •j . t'i O R M `V111
�,• _ 1 4 E tE w
e \ •. es9,YD'H o7• .�,,. : °r 9A. .,,'•,r, J N r [ tl �- O E C N a ---- -- N- - - - - -F N \.
,: l9 1 ..,
"_ ��' /ss pRPC
is C-
v P S E V 1
1 iJ t
CENTER PHASE 6 �
• . _� - �\ I .IO1s1 ,Soo 9
.e,r/S ,
• ° 315.71 el r ➢,a = 4 ?L.�;- J 11111 -
' \, 1 P ° '/w ♦ 1 L 16111 9 ' 919 o,lbis' M•fio 1 iavyjl -, -
`o !L,•° �9° 7 ,4c1!._.� —ltreo vo •t /! la,`4. soo f s.m s59
�g a, a•. �lV .. Q :� �,.4o ye9! LANE !a ioi eon i•,Se 3' `J
. 5 6 1 Ir
11 �. !.' •. c ;.: �� t. .. 2 so,o is 6* 1`3 .0111 • � = 1rl:r,i1 t ?= I,•��K3 R.. .•w' � ,.. d31.E - /•It•11'tt �_i N h �
�1•I 1111 M,•:Off'I '1• ,y � - h Q Iflf
ltl of -,. - •� ••.,. �• \, ` - r� �^ ` •� .. - - - - --
+� CENT
,,; Ep1NA IN M 2
'i Hw Q G� ,a 269.56 231.10 R
WWI 7
"' �' W �(/ !Q` �- .' °;�, °° 3 320.66 -;� ` -I ---- � •iii_ -
:. 27796_ 25O.3o P
•lip ` -. y . a, G ih - --- N ,n
— 'r9J3 /4e+ -- ? N�fc,� 1 s?B.96 O` _
�= ..i.' , ° App.
„� ' '\ ,N�ERCN,► Ppp• F, SF, — ;. Fova�N : , v i
••CENT 1 : GF' poo• °• - ... ,;
i4,1'27 -4 "o" ::r 3io01 SS913 `'
' V'
G OV T. LOT I GOVT LOT 2
' • . 1.• GOVT. LOT .3
CON
'S). �`:`,y ► Mr. s. urw+ ru. �...•. r.., trn. w+ wru. atl�sw. s+> 1tr. a. N.,.. rn.• d�. ..relrM.•wt.tYrrw.�.ra.�r... -.w u..nww�u4.....,.r.......... �, ..e._.�.....,. ._.. _...
BITE�INFORMATION
1
MIT ■ AREA
PNAB■
51 5.087 ACRES
PHA :e
O 1 7.]7]5 ACRES
• TOTAL
1 1•.8705 ACREO
UAOOB BUILOINO AREA ALLOWEO 60%
PHASE
51 11 :,7.4 B.P.
v11ABe
e 1 1e O,eae 9.P.
• TOTAL
1 200,3' B.R.
03
OR 8 OUILOINO AREA BNOWN
PNA BB
I. • ::•1: E.P.
PNAB.
O 1 80,,7 ]4 B.P.
,• TOTAL
1 147,.4:
• OTAIRB.VERT. BNAPTO,•NB:TB.c
COMMON
AREAS
PN A:E
O 1 •1,880 E.P.
PNAB:
:1 •1, :B] B.I.
• TOTAL
1 •B,BB3 E.P.
PAZ INO
REOUIRBO 1/800
PNABE
0. 389 CAp:
PNABE
: 1 3Ee CARO
•TOTAL
784 CARE
PARKIN.
Bf1OWN
PHA::
O 1 ,8E7 CAPE
PNABE
01 ]:5 GARB
-TOTAL
1 •4: CARO
PARKING
VARIANCE PE0008TED
PNA ::
O 1 1•.7 948 CARD
PNABE
: 1 10 140 CAR BI
• TOTAL
1 11.3 911113 CAR :1
� I ,
y1 �yj� ._.. �1 � ��• /� XL. . hI.H /t1,..•y .f
°11;
M.
A/ '1
1 , 1 � Sl Via.• s �T 111111.; . ,, lil�lll�.,� j' ' w/. .f
1,111,1 + •.••. ; -1!I ! 0
i
J II � � y gyp•;' <)il _Zr lr r1T
I Pill
WEST 73RD ST. m '�- 1 ....r.:+��•I,r+•1 . I4...y'_
tM. f1' 111. 61'
\ f
� j 9,91 • ,r�, b:::'lr :l P, \.
I
• °• ` -� 1 I ', it
•
\F ,� 4�f+y �9 I,
I Q
II
,��I`�'�.rr
I``
1I•
�I
I(r.
lu...r.�-.'z 111n
—
,,.
ITTIC.`tTT',R;.j)
4" •\'7. \� \
\.
..I Q II N
1
'I
u Dl'4,,••,•..iw .ar'. _
�����.�I
f
� !' cur fw. ECAf•r,'•s4
designers
ONE ORP CENTER
builders
6 BATE
EDINA MINNESOTA
..
developers
..Y; BITE PLAN
O "0
A.
Cn
' � •'��bRPOM��O�
�aBB
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis Hoffma
City Engineer
Date: 18 September, 1989
Subject: Vacation of Portion
of Scriver Road
Right -of -Way
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # V. A.
Consent W-]
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
0
To Council
Action Fx I
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Vacate right -of -way as requested subject to maintenance of utility easement
over area. (Storm sewer pipe in place.)
i
Info /Background
Attached is the application and a copy of the area (black shading) requested
to be vacated. This is a portion of Scriver Road that was a cul -de -sac before
the roadway was extended to the west. Minnegasco, NSP, U.S. West and Rogers
Cablesystems have no objection to the vacation of the excess right -of -way.
However, the City has a storm sewer on this portion and therefore must maintain
a utility.easement right over the shaded area in'the attached exhibit.
CITY OF EDINA
PUBLIC RIGHT=OFF -WAY VACATION APPLICATION
-Date Initiated
1) I hereby petitiorUhe City Council of the City of Edina to vacate all of the following
described public right -of -way:
Street Alley Utility y � Easement
Drainage Easement Other'-
_ (describe)
Legal description of area proposed to be vacated: To. TX "5.0011-
(See attached copy of plat) yy.,_
Attached copy of scaled drawing showing in full detail the proposed vacation.
Signature
Address ,57% .
Telephone �. 7 7
2) Review
CITY ENGINEER by Acceptable Opposed Conditional
Conditions
MINNEGASCO by Acceptable Opposed l Conditional
Conditions
N.W. BELL by ED Acceptable Opposed Conditional
Conditions
N.S.P. by = Acceptable = Opposed Conditional
Conditions
10 -3800
i
PLAT O
s °re
FOR: NE
V
u
UTILITY EANENT FER PLAT �\ �O / 9.9•
OF NTLAND ACNES Q
/ O
� ppA1NA0E G$ENENT e'C'
� e�roc9l.AT OF NYIAND '
BRICK
V
4'
�•
wnu 1 /0 H 1 rv�•',0.
In � b3 O / F4 • e. 4'e
f +rEM d +'N4
OLp VJ .
ip 4WOOD[N
FENCE
r
HOUSE ° •s0 \Q, ..
CF ��
CCORNE�R im [ 1 4,4 `7�• ��� e -
1� �
/
568'38'IS'W -C
✓ y ` 86 34 O,g •41' '
10 -191M1 �� 51.67 j) ` <. y~ 0 20 40
10.671P) `SBa,36'IS'E '' a •ss�g/ Pay
so 9a Z + a
NN SCALE IN FE[
NDT TANGENT
i q
i 'i ,' � pie
4 4
14
�O
N I REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Edina City Council
FROM: John Keprios, Assistant Director Park and Recreation Department
VIA:. Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT:_ REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5000
DATE: September 15, 1989
AGENDA ITEM VII.A.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Electrical
work for Ballfield lighting
Company
Amount of Quote or Bid
1•
CSI Electric, Inc.
1.
$123,460.00
2•
Killmer Electric Co., Inc.
2.
$166,700.00
3•
Collins Electric
3•
$181,511.00
4.
4,
5.
5,
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
CSI Electric, Inc. $123,460.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Ballfield lighting for VanValkenburg Park Softball Complex.
(Pine wood pole)
ozve-;Cl'�
Si nature
The Recommended bid is ---Z—
within budget no
—Edina Park and Recreation
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
FROM: CEIL SMITH
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000
DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 1989 AGENDA ITEM VII-B.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: BOILER AND MACHINERY INSURANCE
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
�. HARTFORD STEAM BOILER INSURANCE $7,957.00
2. 2.
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
HARTFORD STEAM
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Because of the limited market, the broker, Brandow, Howard, Kohler and
Rosenbloom, Inc., received one quotation. This is coverage for boilers
and mechanical equipment. This premium is a slight reduction from last
year.
a A6/11-1-4k
Signature
The Recommended bid is —
within budget not
Kenneth
11
Department
City
Wallin, Fin nce Director
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
v
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Kenneth Roslancd City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00
DATE: 18 September, 1989 AGENDA ITEM vTT _ c_
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Snow Plow and Wing for Loader
Companv . Amount of Quote or &d
1. LaHass Mfg. & Sales $ 9,769.00
2, Little Falls Machine, Inc. 2, $. 9,965.00
3• 3.
4. 4.
5. 5,
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
LaHass Mfg. & Sales $ 9,769.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This snow plow and wing is for a loader (Unit Number 25 -448 ) purchased
earlier this year. This unit will replace an existing .road grader snow
plow and wing when the new loader is delivered. The funds for this
purchase are from the equipment replacement fund.
Sian ture
The Recommended bid is -- X—
within budget not v
Kenneth
Public Works - Streets
Department
d. City
Wallin, Fjfiance Director
9t�a. ATl�
° 75 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000
DATE: 18 September, 1989
AGENDA ITEM v i I'. D.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Service Body for Service Truck
Company Amount of Quote or &d
1. LaHass Mfg. & Sales 1. $ 7,177.00
2• J. Craft, Inc. 2• $ 8,362.00
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
LaHass Mfg. & Sales $ 7,177.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This piece of equipment is a service box replacement for the existing
service truck (Unit # 25 -340 ) which is used in maintenance of traffic
signals and City street lights. This purchase is funded from the
equipment replacement fund.
Si ature Department
The Recommended bid is
within budget not
Kenneth Roslar d, City
e Director
I
MINUTES
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
SEPTEMBER 12, 1989
9:00 A.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Fran Hoffman, Chairman
Alison Fuhr
Gordon Hughes
Bob Sherman
Craig Swanson
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
OTHERS PRESENT: Mr.
Ms.
Ms.
Ms.
Ms.
Mr.
Ms.
Mr.
Ms.
Ms.
Ms.
Ms.
SECTION A
VIII (A)
and Mrs. Dennis Lafrance, 5357 Oaklawn Avenue South
Donna Hjerpe, 5400 Park Place
Mary Kluesner, 4409 Country Club Road
Anne Bishop, 5324 Halifax Avenue South
Barb Lofquist, 4408 Country Club Road
and Mrs. Bryan Colwell, 5401 Oaklawn Avenue South
Gloria Sullivan, 5412 Oaklawn Avenue South
Michael C. L:.:dberg, 5704 Xerxes Avenue South
Cindy Robb, 5337 Oaklawn Avenue South
Pam Starkey, 5331 Oaklawn Avenue South
Joan Boelter, 5409 Oaklawn Avenue South
Andy Otness, Kellogg Avenue South
Requests on which the Committee recommends approval as requested or modified, and
the Council's authorization of-recommended action.
(1) Request for "NO PARKING - BUS STOP" signs on the west side of Xerxes Avenue
at West 57th Street.
Request received from Michael Lundberg, 5704 Xerxes Avenue South.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Lundberg explained that there is presently an MTC transit sign (T)
at the curbline in front of his home, but this is an explanatory sign only
and does not regulate parking privileges. He further stated that his
neighbors own and operate a dance studio from their home and the clients
of this studio park on Xerxes Avenue, thereby forcing the MTC bus to stop
on the roadway itself to pick up and drop passengers. He requested that
a "NO PARKING" sign be added to this area to ensure the safety of the
riders.
Mrs. Fuhr moved to place "NO PARKING - BUS STOP" signs on the west side of
Xerxes Avenue at West 57th Street. Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Motion
carried 5 -0.
Is
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES
September 12, 1989
Page 2
(2) Request for "NO PARKING" signs on west side of Xerxes Avenue, south of
West 69th Street to parking lot entrance of Community Credit Building,
3101 West 69th Street.
Request received from Craig Miller, 3101 West 69th Street.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Swanson began by reviewing the accident history of this portion of
Xerxes Avenue from West 69th Street to West 70th Street. To date, 16
accidents have been reported, 14 of those occurring at the intersections
of either West 69th or West 70th Street. Accidents at the driveway in
question have not been a problem to date.
Mrs. Fuhr commented that she had reviewed this area and felt that it was
congested with poor visibility when vehicles were parked and the potential
for accidents was there.
Mrs. Fuhr moved to install "NO PARKING "_sip-ns on the west side Xerxes
Avenue south of West 69th Street to the parking lot entrance of Community
Credit Buildine. Mr. Hoffman seconded the motion. Motion carried 5 -0.
(3) Request for "NO PARKIi7G ANY TIME" signs on the west side of McCauley Trail
South, north of Sioux Trail; and on the north side of McCauley Trail West.
Request received by Captain Kleven, Edina Police Department.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Swanson moved to install "NO PARKING ANY TIME" signs on the west side of
McCauley Trail South, north of Sioux Trail: and on the north side of
McCauley Trail West. Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Motion carried 5 -0.
(4) Discuss traffic safety concerns regarding access to Wooddale Park from
Moorland /Edina Boulevard area.
Continued from August meeting.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Hoffman stated that, in reviewing the.last meeting's minutes, the
motion had been made to place pedestrian and 25 mph advisory speed signs
in the area. In checking this area, these signs have been placed. He also
offered his recommendation of enhancing the crosswalk area by repainting,
etc. and /or the placement of "STOP" signs on Country Club Road at the inter-
sections of Moorland and Edina Boulevard. He also reiterated his concern
about re- educating pedestrians to cross at the crosswalk and not midblock,
and also the fact that "STOP" signs and crosswalks would not slow traffic
speeds in the area.
Mrs. Fuhr asked if improving and dignifying the entrance to the park
accompanied with an improved crosswalk area might put more emphasis on
exactly where to cross Country Club and enter the park. Mr. Hughes also
asked what justification or warrants could be provided for installing "STOP"
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES
September 12, 1989
Page 3
signs at this location. He asked Mr. Hoffman if pedestrian traffic was
a published warrant for placement of "STOP" signs.
The residents inquired if anyone had checked into lowering the speed limit
below 30 mph. Mr. Hoffman explained that he had talked to the State and,
based on similar inquiries in the past, he felt very strongly that the
speed limit would not be lowered in this area. His reasoning was that the
State would complete surveys much the same as had been completed by the
Committee and would find that most drivers in this area are driving
reasonably in the 30 mph zone. That is why the Traffic Safety Committee
normally suggests advisory signing to lower speed if at all possible.
Mr. Hughes moved that "STOP" signs be placed on-Country Club Road at
Moorland and also at Edina Boulevard, and that the crosswalk be enhanced
at this location. Mrs. Fuhr seconded the motion. Motion carried 5 -0.
SECTION B
Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request.
None.
SECTION C
Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others.
(1) Discuss traffic safety concerns on West 54th Street, France Avenue to
Wooddale Avenue.
Continued from August meeting.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Swanson began by recapping the accident history on West 54th Street.
The total number of accidents in almost 6 years was 51 total, with 42 of
those occurring at the intersection of France Avenue and West 54th Street.
The nine remaining accidents occurred at various locations along West 54th.
He also presented the results of three speed surveys which were conducted.
One was conducted from 7:20 to 8:20 AM during morning rush hour, one from
4 :30 to 5:30 PM during the evening rush, and the final survey from noon to
approximately 1:00 PM. Both the mid -day and evening surveys fell well
within the tolerances of collector roadways in Edina, with approximately
80% compliance. Only one citation would have been issued had enforcement
efforts been underway. However, the morning survey presented a different
picture. From 7:20 to 8:20 AM there was only 53% compliance and, should
enforcement have been underway, seven citations would have been issued.
Mr. Swanson stated that he would advise enforcement and survey activity
during this morning period to find if this is truly a pattern.
The residents also expressed concern that children are walking on West
54th Street to school bus stops during the hours in question. Mr. Hoffman
and Mr. Swanson stated that the school district tries to keep buses from
stopping as much as possible on collector roadways in Edina and they were
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES
September 12, 1989
Page 4
not aware that stops were being made on West 54th Street. In most cases,
per the residents, the buses will turn onto side streets to make their
stops, but they do stop on West 54th at Oaklawn and also on West 54th at
Kellogg.
A resident also stated that visibility was not good in the area of Edina
Community Lutheran Church, 4113 West 54th Street, as members of the church
use on street parking as opposed to parking in the lot seven days a week.
This adds to the problems of crossing West 54th at this location.
Many members of the neighborhood expressed concern for their children when
crossing to play at Arden Park, but they also were concerned with their
own welfare while crossing at any point of West 54th Street due to speed.
Also during the summer months, canoeists are also present at Minnehaha Creek
making for additional pedestrians concentrated in this area at this time.
Residents questioned the possibility of not widening the.bridge during future
expansions as this had a tendency to slow traffic slightly.
Mr. Hoffman said that what he seemed to be hearing was a concern of speeders,
primarily, and a secondary concern for pedestrian safety in general. The
residents stated that all were valid issues but, primarily, they were con-
cerned with safety to pedestrians.
Mr. Hoffman raised the possibility of striping the roadway to better define
pedestrian walkway. This would also define West 54th as a two -lane versus
a four -lane roadway, as this was also expressed as a concern of the resi-
dents. He also cautioned that highlighting might draw more attention to
the roadway and, thereby, have the reverse affect or increase the speed
problem. Mr. Hoffman was also asked when the upgrading project was to
begin on West 54th and told the residents that it was just being looked at
for some time in the future. However, he felt that with the increasing
concern of the residents, it might be beneficial to look into upgrading
at an earlier time than was originally anticipated.
Mr. Hoffman asked if there was a resident spokesperson who would be able
to provide input as to the highest pedestrian areas as requested in last
month's motion. The residents stated that they were not able to provide
that information at this time and hadn't had the chance to survey their
neighbors.
Mr. Swanson moved to (1) continue the matter pending increased Traffic
Enforcement Unit activities on West 54th Street and additional speed
surveys. (2) contact the school district requesting input on how to keen
edestrians and bus stops off West 54th Street and 3 re guest that the
residents provide input as to number of pedestrians, times of pedestrian
activity, and patterns of pedestrians along West 54th Street. Ms. Andy Otness
volunteered to act as neighborhood representative. Mrs. Fuhr seconded the
motion. Motion carried 5 -0.
(2) Request for installation of "STOP" signs on Meadow Ridge at Everett Place.
Petition received from numerous local residents.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMMITTEE MINUTES
September 12, 1989
Page 5
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Hughes moved to continue this matter for one month as there were no
representatives of the neighborhood present. Mr. Hoffman seconded the
motion. Motion carried 5 -0.
(3) Discuss traffic concerns at entrance /exit of Byerly's, 7101 France Avenue
South.
Request received from Alison Fuhr, Traffic Safety Committee.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Hoffman reviewed the previous discussions on this issue. The latest
record was that Byerly's was to discuss the option of signalization with
Leisure Lane in the hopes of dividing the costs of installation of a signal
at the entrance /exit location. Leisure Lane owners declined involvement and,
at the City Council Meeting, Byerly's withdrew their request based on the
costs of the project.
Mrs. Fuhr asked about the possibility of allowing access from France Avenue,
especially since France Avenue expansion was being planned and implemented.
Mr. Hoffman stated that France Avenue is under the jurisdiction of Hennepin
County and he could see no way that they would allow access from France
based on past history. He said that, in fact, Hennepin County had on recent
projects reduced the number of ingresses and egresses off of County roadways.
Mr. Swanson added that Byerly's had engaged the services of Barton- Aschman
Associates to review options of entrance /exit changes. He felt that since
their opinion was to not make further changes (i.e., finance the traffic
signal), it was not the responsibility of the Committee to comment further.
Mrs. Fuhr moved to study France Avenue access to Byerly's. There was no
second.
Mrs. Fuhr then moved to defer the discussion indefinitely. Mr. Hoffman
seconded the motion. Motion carried 5 -0.
EDINA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
o e`
• ,NroRpow, •
lees
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis Hoffman
City Engineer
Date: 18 September, 1989
Subject: Road Improvement BA -279
West 77 1/2 Street
(Road Connecting
Minnesota Drive with
West 77th Street)
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # yTT
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
a
Action Eil
0
1. C.
To HRA
To Council
Motion
Resolution
Ordinance
Discussion
Review status and joint powers agreement. Authorize Mayor and Manager to sign
agreement when completed.
Info /Background:
Attached is previous information submitted and additional letters from National
Car Rental. Also, aerial photos are to be available for the Council Meeting on
Monday. Staff will make a full presentation at the meeting.
May 22, 1989
Mr. Francis J. Hoffman
Director of Public Works
and City Engineer
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Re: Construction of Link Road Between Minnesota Drive and
West 77th Street, Edina, MN
Dear Fran:
National
CarRental
National Car Rental System, Inc.
World Headquarters
7700 France Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435
(612) 830 -2121
Recently I have received numerous complaints regarding the safety of our
employees as related to public traffic entering and exiting our employee
parking lot. In one situation, an accident took place because a non - employee
was not observing a safe distance between his vehicle and that of one of our
employees which resulted in an accident. In another instance, a non- employee
exhibited very aggressive behavior including verbal and physical threats while
a National employee was parking her car.
From a safety standpoint; elimination of public traffic through our employee
parking lot would greatly improve the current situation. At a minimum,
National would request increased patrolling of our parking lot by the Edina
police department to help reduce or possibly eliminate these problems.
In addition, what is the new timetable for construction of the link road
between Minnesota Drive and West 77th Street. Please contact me at your
earliest convenience so that we can discuss both these matters further. My
office number is 893 -6246.
Sincerely,
NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SYSTEM, INC.
Mark E. Batti
Senior Attorn
Properties Department
/jo
September 1, 1989
Mr. Francis J. Hoffman, P.E.
Director of Public Works and
City Engineer
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Re: Cost Allocation for Minnesota Drive
Dear Fran:
National
CarRental
National Car Rental System, Inc.
World Headquarters
7700 France Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435
(612) 830 -2121
Thi -s is a follow up of our recent phone discussion regarding allocation of
costs for the construction of Minnesota Drive. National Car Rental System,
Inc. will agree to pay 23% of all costs incurred with respect to the
construction of Minnesota Drive, exclusive of signals, such amount not to
exceed $200,000. Please refer to Mr. Thompson's letter to you dated 7 -2 -86
for further information. It is my understanding that these costs will
probably occur in the form of a special assessment to be levied by the City
of Edina and paid over a period of 10 years.
In addition, it was also my understanding that based on this agreement to pay
for a portion of the costs of the construction of Minnesota Drive,. the City
of Edina has agreed to be responsible for all the costs associated with the
construction of the link road between Minnesota Drive and West 77th Street
estimated to cost $709,000. It was my understanding that this agreement was
memorialized by a resolution adopted by the City Council.
If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please feel free to
contact me. My office number is 893 -6246.
Sincerely,
NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SYSTEM, INC.
Mark E. Battis c
Senior Attorney
Properties Department
/jo
cc: Charles Lynch
11/
V
• ��•'N�UAP(1M��O/
Iliad
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To :- Mayor & City Council
From: Francis Hoffman
City Engineer
Date: 10 July, 1989
Subject: Road Improvement BA -279
West 77 1/2 Street
(Road Connecting
Minnesota Drive with
West 77th Street)
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
y_,,.
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
❑
To Council
Action
0
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Review status and joint powers agreement. Authorize Mayor and Manager to sign
agreement when completed.
Info /Background:
The purpose is to update status of road improvement with attached sketches
(Exhibits 1 and 2), and sample of joint powers agreement (Exhibit 3). The
project requires right -of -way purchases or negotiations. The vacant lot west
of the National Car Rental property has had a couple of potential developers
look at the site. Staff has attempted to-work this road project into the
potential development of the vacant lot. Staff will make a presentation at
the Council meeting.
The following chronological listing of events is attached.
q
1979 - National Car Rental
- City approves plat which includes an agreement which provides street
easement under certain conditions.
1980 - City places proposed road on the state aid system which would allow
future funds for construction.
1981 thru 1984 - No items on said road appeared on City Council agenda.
1985 - City Council becomes aware of Homart project in Bloomington in April,
1985.
- During mid 1985, the City determines that the Homart project is of Metro
significance.
- The result is a settlement which results in'a discussion of proposed
road.
1986 - Bloomington proceeds with Homart project, builds roadway around the
Homart site.
Bloomington asks for cooperative construction agreement in which the City
of Edina might participate.
City Council directs staff to work with National Car Rental and
Bloomington on Road projects.
1987 - Staff from Bloomington, Edina, and National Car Rental develop a joint
power's agreement in which Edina pays no portion of the roadway known as
Minnesota Drive from France Avenue to W. 77 1/2 Street. National Car
Rental maintains position that they would pay up to $200,000.00 for a
portion of the actual construction of Minnesota Drive. Project costs for
Minnesota Drive are approximately $800,000.00 and normally Edina would
have participated at a 50% cost split because roadway is a border
street. National Car Rental is unwilling to complete the negotiations
until determination on W. 77 1/2 Street costs are made.
Hedberg property is under review for development and Exhibit 2 of Traffic
Impact Study indicates W. 77 1/2 Street is a key street segment (see
attached Exhibit 2).
Hennepin County plans to widen France Avenue in 1989 north of Minnesota
Drive to W. 70th Street subject to City Council approval. (Now 1990).
Additionally, if the Hedberg property moves ahead in a normal course of
events, the staff would expect major reconstruction on W. 76th Street
between Edinborough Way and France Avenue during 1989.
It appears important to have a good east -west arterial in place during
the above construction. Traffic passing thru 76th and York could use
76th, Edinborough Way, Minnesota Drive, W. 77 1/2 Street and 77th Street
to Highway 100. Additionally, ramp metering on I -494 could occur during
1990.
December, City Council authorizes project and negotiations began on
right -of -way for new road.
1988 - National Car Rental indicates that land exchange with Northwestern
National Life not acceptable.
- Project placed on hold when it became obvious materials from Centennial
Lakes were available for job.
OIT E-4
Aed.
ed.
Y *A '�00 m \ �y� Nf �NN 0. 4 /� n \fj \ �\
C%
1011i 1P
qo,
cp
0, 166
10
41:
' 6 m: \ :- ! � L e9062t' R � `0 0
'Lol
77 th. St.
KLA w 3 3' 33'
m
III If
1 611
bo%
p
—129 iING
ROU tiUbt
ri
• I _I !� �1 _I �I . {. I �> �j ,i I I oSm I I STJ
e .. S--
a S rn S.
ST.
Exhibit L W.
6: to
�
z n.�
11 ..r W_
= Key Streets and ,- Il FaRREST
I�, }/f • r. a+ / N vi} ui ui �^ of OR,. `
o' intersections ST o W. II 68 to ST.
I oU_^
r1 Q Key Intersections �� = — , W 69 in ST
1111111111 Key Street Segments oa ■. 69TH ST. .� < < < > a > = ST
i W. TO to
s •� Proposed New Streets TO', =Tn "ST.
_ S_ ao. W W_ 'I- RICHFIEL ST..
pN, T o TON T1'fzsT 1Q80 POP. 37 85
■ Y • ' - x
72nd
T.
72 ntl
Hedberg
cc�� W
A76thST. �s d t .7a a0 W- T3 th c ST-. M1B1SC US S, S"nRTH OR I o FLL OR. - 'T4 Ith c ST W.
It FORD a;
pop
CC
. S T
o 7ARKLAWN Z 75th < ' 1 W- 3:2•'�"
I- S
c
m
ST..
IEolmA IN o 100 W
-
el� 4 .r.� un.
v1K1NG LVO_
n- y�
4'
18th z
..nr1 =i1• YALLEY R M. dOtn W
Si. a. W y M. 81ST ST. Z
O .. Blsr ST.
d ui�
�O t
5T.
iT ;n > > a W.. DUcOH- GR.
i �.. -ENTER ` z
W.82ntl ST• ¢(( r.•C' .yiT_ o _ o - a •.lf3rtl
\ o r •. 8'rd ST. - Pte• = -
r =� . _ Note Analysis of 1 -494 wil
' 1 {t �
! i �••, ST ° a z �l r - t/v RQ. m
and the Interchanges
;TTLE� France Avenue, and "
W _
i^ '^_ uQaRIS Guard _
T2iN R21■ p 2 ¢ W�� 7� w�i„
�. a ir45F+8UaN ��! �:R. T,
I 20121 m <� = a n r
6 �� ' _�. °7rn S a 9�G- t�.:: ~�tL =S N. 86tH
L. ST.
EXHIBIT 3
AGREEMENT FOR DIVISION OF COST
OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF
STREET AND STORM SEWER
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of
1989, by and between the City of Bloomington, a body poli-
tic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota ( "Bloomington "),
and the City of Edina, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the
State of Minnesota ( "Edina ").
WHEREAS, Bloomington has completed construction of a street and
storm sewer (including curb and gutter, bituminous surfacing, landscaping
and related improvements) from France Avenue to a point approximately 1,300
feet west of France Avenue which lies along the common corporate limits of
Bloomington and Edina ( "Street Improvements "); and
WHEREAS, Bloomington has requested Edina to share in the cost of
the Street Improvements and Edina is willing to share such cost to the ex-
tent and in the manner herein stated; and
WHEREAS, this Agreement is made pursuant to the provisions of
Minnesota Statutes Section 471.59 (the "Joint Powers Act "); and
WHEREAS, the cost of constructing the Street Improvements was
$ ( "Construction Costs "), which amount does not include, and
which Street Improvements do not include, the cost of constructing the
waterline and sidewalk along the south side of the Street Improvements; and
WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to set forth their respective
obligations with regard to the Street Improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND -
TERMS HEREIN, IT IS HEREBY AGREED THAT:
1. Bloomington, with the cooperation of Edina's Engineer, was
responsible for the supervision and direction of the construction of the
Street Improvements. As such, Bloomington agrees to indemnify and hold
Edina harmless from and against any and all loss, cost, damage and expense,
including, without limitation, reasonable attorney's fees whether suit be
brought or not, due to any claim or demand arising out of, or claimed or
alleged to arise out of, any act or omission of Bloomington or its
employees, agents, contractors or suppliers in connection with the planning,
engineering, construction or operation of the Street Improvements, subject,
however to the provisions of paragraph 6 hereof.
2. Bloomington shall have, and has, full power and authority, for
and on behalf of Edina and Bloomington, to negotiate, compromise and settle,
or litigate any disputes of any kind with any contractor, supplier, surety
on any bond, or with any other person or entity, arising out of or due to
the construction of the Street Improvements.
I
3. Any and all employees of Bloomington and all other persons
engaged by Bloomington in the performance of any work or services required,
volunteered, or provided for in connection with the construction of the
Street Improvements or required herein to be performed by Bloomington shall
riot be considered employees of Edina, and that any and all claims that may
or might arise under the Workmen's Compensation Act of the State of
Minnesota on behalf of any of said employees while so engaged, and any and
all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission
on the part of said employees while so engaged on any of the work or
services provided or to be rendered by Bloomington shall in no way be the
obligation or responsibility of Edina.
4. The portion of the Street Improvements within the corporate
limits of Edina is adjacent to and benefits the property owned and occupied
by National Car Rental ( "National "). Edina shall negotiate with National to
reach an agreement satisfactory to Edina as to the amount of Construction
Costs to be assessed against National's property ( "Assessed Amount "). The
Assessed Amount shall also be the amount Edina shall pay to Bloomington as
Edina's share of the total Construction Cost. Edina shall pay its share of
the total Construction Cost to Bloomington immediately following the expira-
tion of the appeal period, without any appeal, provided by Minnesota
Statutes, Section 429.081. However, if any appeal is filed, payment by
Edina shall be made only upon settlement of, or final judgment in, such
appeal and then only in the amount to be paid by National pursuant to such
settlement or final judgment.
S. Edina shall not be required to pay any portion of the cost of
constructing the waterline and sidewalk located on the south side of the
Street Improvements.
6. Edina shall maintain the storm sewer comprising a part of the
Street Improvements in good and operating condition without cost to .
Bloomington and shall hold Bloomington harmless from and indemnified against
any loss, cost or damage or expense, including, without limitation,
reasonable attorney's fees whether suit be brought or not, due to any claim -
or demand arising out of the failure of Edina to so maintain the storm sewer
improvements. In the event the storm sewer improvements are demolished or
destroyed, Edina shall have no obligation to replace or restore the storm
sewer improvement. Bloomington hereby grants to Edina such easements and
rights to enter on, over, under and across the portion of the Street Im-
provements within Bloomington as may be necessary or desirable from time to
time for Edina to fulfill the provisions of this paragraph.
7. Until further agreement of the parties is reached, Bloomington
shall maintain the street surface in good and operating condition, including
snowplowing, and shall hold Edina harmless from and indemnified against any
loss, cost, damage or expense, including, without limitation, reasonable
attorney's fees whether suit be brought or not, due to any claim or demand
arising out of or claimed or alleged to arise out of, the negligence or
failure of Bloomington to so maintain the street surface.
8. All records kept by Bloomington and Edina with respect to the
Street Improvements shall be subject to the examination by the representa-
tives of each at reasonable times during normal business hours.
-2-
It
9. All notices, reports or demands required or permitted to be
given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be
given when delivered personally to any officer of the party to which notice
is being given, or when deposited in the United States mail in a sealed
envelope, with registered or certified mail, postage prepaid thereon,
addressed to the parties at the following addresses:
To Edina: 4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Attention: City Engineer
To Bloomington: 2215 West Old Shakopee Road
Bloomington, Minnesota 55431
Attention: Director of Public Works
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Agreement to be executed by their respective duly authorized officers as of
the day and year first above written.
CITY OF BLOOMINGTON
Its Mayor
Its Manager
CITY OF EDINA
is Mayor
is Manager
-3-
/1N� ,1 A
0
e
ItlPB
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis Hoffman
City Engineer
Date: 24 July, 1989
Subject: Minnesota Drive -
W. 77J St. Construction
Joint Powers Agreement
Continuation from
7/10/89
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # mui. c.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
❑
To Council
Action ❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Review status and joint powers agreement. Authorize Mayor and Manager to
sign agreement when completed.
Info /Background:
The following information is provided to assist in clarifying the situation.
Attached is a letter from National Car Rental in which they agree to build
Minnesota Drive with Homart. As such, what happened is the two adjacent
property owners on Minnesota Drive are paying for the new street. Bloomington,
at this point, has temporarily funded National Car Rental portion with the
expectation that a joint powers agreement would be executed between the two
cities allowing for payment with an assessment to National Car Rental.
Therefore, neither City funded the initial $800,000 project. The attached
Exhibit showing state aid streets shows the new linking street as a part
of our master road plan. This new project if assessed would result in an
assessment of $16,160.00 based on $40.00 per lineal foot. However, it would
be a rear -yard assessment and require only a one -third rate which would result
in an assessment of only $5,386.00 for National Car. Additionally, we render
a triangle of land west of the new road (3,900 square feet) useless to
National Car.
Report /Recommendation
Minnesota Drive =
W. 771 St. Construction
Joint Powers Agreement
Continuation from
7/10/89
Page Two
Also, National Car voluntarily agreed to assist in the Minnesota Drive
project which they did not have to given our opinion at the time of the
Homart issue.
The bottom line to staff is that a piece of our collector - arterial system
was completed at no cost to Edina (Minnesota Drive) and now we are com-
pleting the next link which was one of our requirements as part of the
Indirect Source Permit from PCA on the Centennial Lakes project.
r
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: 77th Street Road Project
The staff has been working with Bloomington Staff and National Car
Rental on development of.the road between.Homart and National Car
Rental. The Edina staff has been reviewing the construction plans and
working with National Car Rental on aspects on construction affecting
their property.
Attached is a letter from W. Bernie Thompson on the position of National
Car Rental on the road project. Mr. Thompson will be in attendance on
Monday evening to further discuss this matter with City Council.
If City Council desires for staff to continue working with Bloomington
on the project, the next step would be to develop a joint powers
agreement between the cities incorporating the National Car Rental
agreement.
FJH:Im
7/18/86
s
®® National Car Rental
July 2, 1986
National Car Rental 5vstem, Inc.
7700 France Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435
612 - 830 -2121
Mr. Fran Hoffman
Director of Public Works & Engineering
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Fran:
Subject: 77th Street Cost Allocation
A HOUSEHOLD
INTERNATIONAL COMPANY
As we discussed on the telephone, Homart and National have come
to an understanding that National Car Rental will pay 23% of
all costs incurred with respect to the construction of 77th
Street, exclusive of signals, such amount not to exceed
$200,000. As we discussed, these costs would probably occur in
the form of a special assessment to be levied by the City of
Edina and paid'for over a period of several years.
Please let me know if there is anything further National needs
to do to implement this cost sharing agreement.
We strongly desire that the "link road" between 77th Street and
Parklawn can be constructed at the same time in order to
prevent the use of National's parking lot as a public
thoroughfare, thus creating a severe traffic hazard to our
employees. As the benefit of the "link road" will be to those
west of us, we would expect that the cost of that road would be
assessed to those benefiting and not to National.
This is also to confirm that National has agreed to the
construction of the free right turn at the northwest corner of
the intersection of 77th and France.
Yours very truly,
C
W. Bernie
Corporate
Finance
WBT: djg
Thompson
Vice President
cc: S. Reinstein, Homart
P. Neuvi11e
D. Hanson
Affiliates: Europcar, Tilden
O �
.�y
• f bRro", •
jass
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Kenneth Rosland
Agenda Item # vIII.
'D.
From: Craig Larsen
Consent
❑
-
Information Only
0
Date: September 18, 1989
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject: Berenberg Lawsuit
❑
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
No Action.
Info /Background:
Judge Montgomery has granted the City motion for Summary Judgement and has
dismissed the lawsuit brought by the Berenbergs. At this writing we do
not know if the decision will be appealed.
I have attached the Judge's order and supporting memorandum for Council review.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
Danny B. Berenberg and
Christina A. Berenberg,
Plaintiffs,
VS.
City of Edina, a municipal.
corporation,
Defendant.
U(rse.y ti rth i tnry RR 1909 Lj�
DISTRICT COURT
FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
S}B.U.S.R
File No. 88 -20671
The above - entitled matter came on for hearing before the
Honorable Ann Montgomery, Judge of the above -named Court, on the
2d day of June, 1989, upon cross - motions by both plaintiff and
defendant for summary judgment.
Frank J. walz, Esq. and Caryn S. Glover, Esq. appeared for
and on behalf of plaintiffs, and Steven K. Champlin, Esq.
appeared for and on behalf of defendant.
The Court having heard the arguments of counsel and having
considered all the files, reoords and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is DENIED.
2. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: this 30"L-day
of August, 1989.
BY THE COURT:
Ann Montg er
Judge of ist ict C rt
r
HEMORAMUM
Plaintiffs are attempting to subdivide their residential
property in Edina into two unequal. lots. At the time of their
application for subdivision to the City of Edina [City) on June
22, 1988, their property consisted of approximately 1.4 acres
with a single family residence located in the southwest corner.
The proposed subdivision would result in one lot [Lot 11
measuring approximately 14,400 square feet, with 118 feet of
frontage and a depth of 120 feet. The second lot [Lot 21 would
measure approximately 46,609 square feet, with 76 feet of
frontage and a depth of 405. The Lot 2 is subject to a power
line easement which extends 50 feet from its eastern boundary.
Plaintiffs stated in their application that the purpose for this
subdivision was for the future construction of a single family
residence on Lot 2.
The Edina Community Development and Planning Commission
[planning Commission] reviewed plaintiffs' proposal and issued a -
staff report according to the city's Subdivision Ordinance No.
sol, sec. 6, on July 6, 1988.1 The staff Report concluded the
proposed subdivision did "not represent sound community
planning." This conclusion was based on a comparison of the
1. The ordinance provides in part: The Planning
Commission... shall examine each plat and report and
make a recommendation thereon in writing to the Council
as to the following matters: * * * the suitability of
the plat from the standpoint of community planning.
2
size of the proposed lots to the average size of existing lots in
the xilldale Addition, the area in which plaintiffs' lot was
originally platted.
Additionally, the Staff Report cited the non - compliance of
the proposed subdivision to various provisions in the City's
Comprehensive Plan as further bases for their recommendation.
specifically, the Staff Report noted that the proposed
subdivision would have a negative impact upon the "character and
symmetry" of the neighborhood because the creation of Lot 2 would
give the appearance of a "neck lot." The Staff Report also cited
the Comprehensive Plan's requirement of increased minimum lot
sizes as the final basis for their recommendation.
After several hearings on plaintiffs' application, during
which the Planning Commission heard testimony from the City
Planner, plaintiffs' attorney and planning consultant, and area
residents, the staff Report was adopted by the Planning
Commission on July 27, 1988.
A little over two months later on October 3, the Edina City -
Council considered plaintiffs' proposed subdivision. The City
Council heard much the same testimony as was heard before the
Planning Commission. At the conclusion of the testimony, the
City council directed that findings of fact consistent with the
Planning Commission's recommendation be drafted. These findings
were subsequently adopted by the City Council in a brief hearing
on October 17, 1989. Pur "suant to these findings, plaintiffs'
proposed subdivision was denied by the City Council.
3
The Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure provide that summary
judgment must be granted if the record shows "that there is not a
genuine issue as to any material fact and that either party is
entitled to judgment as a matter of law." Minn. R. Civ. P.
56.03. In passing on a motion for summary judgment, the sole
function of the trial court is to determine whether there is an
issue of fact to be tried.
Ees�er�l._W�aving. �._Lo_an,�s s.� ► 308 N . w . 2 d 471, 480 ( Minn . 1981).
The moving party bears the burden of proof, and the nonmoving
party enjoys the benefit of the view of evidence most favorable
to it. gand. 8n ..�Y�_..A1.1Q_0,1_�if..9...•_- CSC..... 411 N.W.2d 902, 906 (Minn.
Ct. App.. 1987), (Minn. November 13, 1 987) (citing Ii4.td
YT._He ,re.id, 305 N.W.2d 337, 339 (Minn. 1981)) .
In the present case, both plaintiff and defendant have moved
for summary judgment. Both parties base their motion upon the
question of whether the City's denial of the proposed subdivision
was arbitrary and capricious and whether this procedure violated
equal protection. However, prior to analyzing the substantive
summary judgment issues, this court must decide a procedural
issue, that is, whether the records made before the local zoning
body and city council are sufficient for review.
Recently, inW._ ari. S. vA..., Y,�..��.t.y_sz._.91Q.Qmin.gt9n, 421 N.W.2d 307
(Minn. 1988), the Minnesota Supreme Court reviewed a case quite
similar to the instant case. In the plaintiff appealed
a grant of summary judgment, contesting the district court's
determination that the City of Bloomington did not act
arbitrarily or capriciously in denying his subdivision
4
application. The district court had made this determination
based upon the "record" compiled by the city. In its discussion
of the propriety of the district court's reliance upon the city's
findings, verbatim transcripts of the city council hearings and
memoranda submitted by the parties, the supreme court stated that
a trial court "should establish the scope and conduct of its
review of a municipality's zoning decision by considering the
nature, fairness and adequacy of the proceeding at the local
level and the adequacy of the record of the local proceeding."
Iff.L at 31213. Consistent with this evaluation the court held
that:
Where the municipal proceeding was fair and the record
clear and complete, review should be on the record.
Where the municipal body has proposed formal findings
contemporaneously with its decision and there is an
accurate verbatim transcript of the proceedings, the
record is likely to be clear and complete.
I.d_, at 313.
Here, the plaintiff received several on the record hearings
before both the Planning Commission and the City Council.
Plaintiffs and counsel were given full opportunity to present all
the testimony they wished to support their proposed subdivision.
Furthermore, with the exception of some minor gaps in the
transcript of the first hearing before the Planning Commission,
the record before this Court is unquestionably clear and
complete.
Finally, contrary to plaintiffs' contentions, the City did
record the facts and legally sufficient reasons for their denial
contemporaneously with its decision and thus complied with the
5
Minnesota supreme Court's holding in
Heidiaa, 303 Minn. 240, 243, 226 N.W.2d 865, 900 (1975). The City
Council did not actually deny plaintiffs' request until October
17, not on October 3 as plaintiffs maintain. The City had not
completed its fact finding until the October 3 hearing. It would
be an unreasonable request to require the City to carefully draft
a detailed set of findings on the spot.
In resolution of this threshold procedural issue, this Court
will examine the verbatim transcripts and minutes of the
hearings, the Planning Commission's Staff Report, and the City
Council's findings as the record for review. There 1s ample data
on the record from which to evaluate whether the city's decision
was arbitrary or capricious.
Because the interpretation of an existing zoning ordinance,
together with those legislative enactments incorporated into the
zoning ordinance by the municipality, is a question of law for a
trial court to decide, summary judgment may be appropriately _
considered in the present case. See .Aeon 348
N.W.2d 66, 72 (Minn. 1984) ; 9.de.11.�t_._._ City
_.._of ..E-agan, 348 N.W.2d
792, 797 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984).
Moreover, even if the ordinance enacted by the municipality
is valid in and of itself, this court must determine whether the
municipality's decision based upon this ordinance was reasonable
and not arbitrary and capricious. -- &..AXLS_Qn at 314;
Qf•..Minn.e•.dR.o1.s, 401 N.W.2d 408, 412 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). "When
a municipality states reasons for denying the permit a reviewing
court may reverse the decision if the reasons are legally
6
insufficient or if the decision is without factual basis." Arkpco
395 N . w . 2 d 115, 117 (Minn. Ct .
App. 1986). Consequently, the City's actions must be evaluated
first on the basis of the validity of the zoning ordinance, and
second in light of the reasonableness -of the City's action based
upon the ordinance.
The terms-of the ordinance must be examined in their plain
and ordinary meaning. QSi.el.l at 797. The ordinance must be
construed strictly against the city and in favor of the property
owner. . _ �,ity fr..�.� s ey i.l l..e , 295
N.W.2d 604, 608 (Minn. 1980).
One of the bases upon which the city denied plaintiffs'
proposed subdivision was that it was contrary to Edina City
Ordinance No. 801. Section 6 of this provision provides for the
examination of the plat by the Planning commission and report to
the City Council as to the "suitability of the plat from the
standpoint of community planning."
This statement is much like that considered by the Minnesota'.
Court of Appeals in O.d.e11�1L�,�.i.X_.A,.,a -4 -an, 348 N:W.2d 792 (Minn.
Ct. App. 1984). In Odell, the court of appeals determined that
the stated purpose of an Eagan subdivision ordinance, "to promote
an attractive and stable community" was impermissibly vague. .Id,.
at 797. As a result, the court indicated that this could not
serve as an independent authority for disapproving a plat. Id.,.
(quoting o u,t.h.es.ri_.oap...___D.e v......_.ui�d �.,,..,- I?.ra..gg e.rs , 696 F. 2 d 1347,
1351 (11th Cir. 1983)).
7
. I +
Likewise, the statement, "suitability of the plat from the
standpoint of community planning ", relied upon by the City is
vague. The City's statement regarding "suitability" stands
alone, with no legally sufficient supporting rationale. Even if
this standard did not fail for vagueness, it cannot not be-upheld
as a bald assertion of fact. The City cannot premise its
decision on this basis.
The second portion of the Zoning Ordinance upon which the
city relied is found in the City's Comprehensive Plan.. This
comprehensive Plan was incorporated by reference into the City's
Zoning ordinance by Ordinance No. 825. This ordinance provides
in pertinent part that the:
standards and regulations for guiding future
development and redevelopment should be based upon the
stated goals, objectives and policies of the City of
Edina Comprehensive Plan, as from time to time amended,
which constitutes the City of Edina's statement of
philosophy concerning the use of land within its
jurisdiction.
Edina ordinance No. 825, sec. 1.
The city appears to rely upon a policy in the Comprehensive -
Plan which requires "increased minimum lot sizes for single
family and two family lots on steep slopes." Comprehensive Plan
at 5. Lot 2, which plaintiffs agree features "steep" slopes,, far
exceeds the normal minimum lot size mandated by the.City's Zoning
ordinance. In fact, the resulting lot would be more than three
times larger than the minimum. using this factor as a basis for
denial is unreasonable and is neither factually supported nor
legally sufficient.
8
The City also relies on a portion of the comprehensive Plan
which provides for the protection of "the lands, waterbodies, and
watercourses of Edina from erosion, sedimentation, slippage, and
vegetation removal resulting from inappropriate uses of steep
slopes." Bje.je. Comprehensive Plan at 5. Utilizing this standard,
the City found that the proposed subdivision would "have an
adverse impact on the present unique natural environment and
terrain surrounding the pond." Findings of Fact at 7.' This
finding was supported only by the testimony of the City Planner
and the protestations and assertions of neighborhood residents.
The City produced no expert testimony upon which they could make
a finding based upon the previously cited policy.
This erosion policy is a highly technical one, and the
City's ultimate conclusion as to the "adverse impact on the
present unique natural environment of the pond" would have been
better supported had they produced more technical and qualified
testimony. Although there is no mention of a requirement for
expert testimony in the cases which plaintiffs claim support
their position, it seems logical, particularly in light of the
testimony presented by the City of Bloomington in S- walz-Qn_ 1t .
-ci-Y .o.f_ -5Jso.omi.nQtn.n, 421 N.W.2d 307 (Minn. 1988) (City Planner;
City Forester and a wildlife biologist), that expert testimony
should be required in a case such as this.
It cannot be said, however, that-the City's decision based
upon the testimony it received was arbitrary and capricious. The
City also relied upon a policy in the Comprehensive Plan which
allows "subdivisions of developed single family lots only if
9
neighborhood character and symmetry are preserved." This
statement is undefined. Neither the Comprehensive Plan, nor the
Platting ordinance, nor the Zoning Ordinance itself provide any
clues as to what elements are included in an evaluation of
"neighborhood character and symmetry."
At times, however, the phrase was coupled with references to
Lot 2's creation of the appearance of a "neck or flag lot," also
prohibited by the comprehensive Plan. The fact that these
policies were referred to in unison clarifies what is meant by
character and symmetry. This is further supported by an
examination of the platting diagram of the Hilldale Addition.
From this diagram, it is clear that the proposed subdivision
would be inconsistent with the "symmetry" of the present
neighborhood. Consequently, the city's denial on this basis was
not unreasonable or arbitrary and capricious. Nonetheless, as
both the requirement for the preservation of neighborhood
"character and symmetry" and the prohibition against "neck or
flag lots" appear to go to neighborhood aesthetics, they may not_
be the sole justification for approval or denial of a
subdivision. 1dt e_�_ s M�9.� X J. x_ to.�K.. ,9_e�_ =pq,.�� _.__C t_y._Of__ -Khi_t..e
Bear -LaXe, 324 N.W. 2d 174, 177 -78 (Minn. 1982) ; Qd211 at 797.
Similarly, the Whit.&...B.e.ar__S-g -cXinQ case applies with equal
force to Vie "undesirable precedent" of possible further
subdivisions in the neighborhood. This also goes to aesthetic
considerations which might affect the value of neighboring
private residences. This as well, is not a sufficient basis in
and of itself to deny plaintiffs' proposed subdivision.
10
Likewise, neither is neighborhood opposition. The City
council heard testimony and received written submissions by
numerous area residents opposing plaintiffs' proposed
subdivision. While "neighborhood sentiment may be taken into
consideration in any zoning decision, it may not constitute the
sole bases for granting or denying a given permit." 1L(�r1hV_es,tezn
281 N:W.2d 865, 869 (Minn. 1979) .
Even though the City has relied on some impermissible bases
for its denial of plaintiffs' proposed subdivision, and relied on
several bases which, alone, could not provide a sufficient basis
for denial, it nonetheless has relied on several bases which were
legally sufficient. The potential impact of the proposed
subdivision upon the environment; the undesirable effect of a
"neck" or "flag" lot upon the character and symmetry of the
neighborhood and other aesthetic concerns; and neighborhood
opposition, when considered together, provide a reasonable basis
as a matter of law for the City's decision to deny plaintiffs' _
application. summary judgment is therefore granted in favor of
the City on the claim of arbitrary and capricious action.
The same disposition is be reached with respect to
plaintiffs' equal protection claim. The standard for evaluating
equal protection claims in zoning cases was set out by the
Minnesota Supreme Court in XQ,xtby�,es..t.er�l...
Fiil.l.s, 281 N.W.2d 865 (Minn. 1979). The court stated:
[a] zoning ordinance must operate uniformly on those
similarly situated—the equal protection clauses of
the Minnesota Constitution and of the Fourteenth
Amendment of the United States constitution require
that "one applicant not be preferred over another for
11
reasons unexpressed or unrelated to the health,
welfare, or safety of the community or any other
particular and permissible standards or conditions
imposed by the relevant zoning ordinances.
1`cj.., at 869 [citations omitted).
unlike plaintiffs' initial claim, when considering the equal
protection claim, this court must examine evidence which was not
a part of the record before the City. Of necessity, the court
must evaluate the claim by reference to the City's treatment of
other subdivision applications.
Initially, plaintiffs have made no showing that their
application was treated differently from any other applications
made by applicants who were similarly situated. There is no
evidence that the City has ever received a subdivision
application from a resident of the Hilldale neighborhood.
Although plaintiffs contend that they should be compared to
anyone ever requesting and receiving or being denied an
application for subdivision in Edina, the supreme court indicated
- in 5-wanspn that it is appropriate for a city to compare an
applicant with other property owners within his or her own
neighborhood. 421 N.W.2d at 314.
Even if this court were to compare the °treatment by the City
of plaintiffs' application with others in Edina, plaintiffs still
cannot show that they were similarly situated to other applicants
because no applications were filed simultaneously with theirs.
In Nor,. thwQ� ..t.e.rn..__C.o..l.l.e.,ge, plaintiff's request for a special use
permit was denied at the same time that another college's request
was granted. The court held "[t]he almost simultaneous filing of
two applications * * * clearly mandated that both applicants be
12
accorded equal treatment." 261 N.W.2d at 869 (quoting $.8Y_y,
TQ- WnS.hip- -of-- Grow, 296 Minn. 1, 7, 206 N.W, 2d 19, 23 (1973)).
Clearly, this language emphasizes the importance of the timing of
application filing and City consideration when evaluating an
equal protection claim.
Finally, plaintiff has made no showing that the rationale
used by the City to deny plaintiffs' application were, in their
entirety, impermissible "standards or conditions imposed by the
relevant zoning ordinances." N,0 xShreS,x,er.n__C_o.l..�.�..5[e at 869. As
was discussed $ -Up ra, the City's decision was based upon valid
Policies set out in the Comprehensive Plan, which had been
incorporated into the City's Zoning ordinance. Thus, plaintiffs
have not shown that the City engaged in prohibited unequal
treatment in considering their application. summary judgment in
favor of the City is therefore proper on this claim as well.
For the reasons stated above, this court finds that, as a
matter of law, the actions of the City of Edina were neither -
arbitrary nor capricious and that the bases for its denial of
Plaintiffs, application were legally sufficient. Furthermore,
plaintiffs' claim of a denial of equal protection by the City has
no basis in fact. Consequently, summary judgment in favor of the
City is granted on both claims.
ANN MONTGOMERY
3.3
r�
O
1
0
9)�/'
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Kenneth Rosland
Agenda Item # VIII.
' E.
From: Craig Larsen
Consent
❑X
-
Information Only
❑
Date: September 18, 1989
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject: CDBG Third Party
0
To Council
' Funding Agreements
Action
❑Motion
U]
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Authorize Mayor and Manager to execute agreements for projects approved by the
City Council.
Info /Background:
Third party agreements allow the City to fund certain CDBG projects and services
which are provided by outside agencies. We currently have three such projects:
The H.O.M.E. Program; Day Care subsidies; and the handicapped project at the
Community Center. The agreements set forth the standard requirements of HUD
for using CDBG funds. New, this year, is the requirement that the agreements
be executed prior to release of funds by HUD.
A copy of the agreement with Greater Minneapolis Day Care is attached for Council
review. The other two agreements are identical in form.
THIRD PARTY AGREEMENT
URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
GRANT PROGRAM
This agreement made and entered into by and between the City of Edina (City)
and Greater Minneapolis Day Care Association (Provider).
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the City is a cooperating unit in the Urban Hennepin County
Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) by virtue of a joint coopera-
tion agreement executed between the City and Hennepin County pursuant to MSA
471.59 and
WHEREAS, the City has executed a subrecipient agreement with Hennepin County
which allocates $20,000 from the Year XV (FY 1989) Urban Hennepin County CDBG
program for the purpose of supporting the activity as identified in Exhibit
1, attached and a part of this agreement, hereinafter referred to as "activ-
ity."
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained
in this Agreement, the parties hereto mutually agree to the following terms
and conditions:
1. The Uniform Administrative Requirements in 24 CFR 570.502 issued by
the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD),
shall apply to activity.
2. The Provider shall be responsible for procurement of all supplies,
equipment, services, and construction necessary for implementation
of the activity. Procurement shall be carried out in accordance
with the OMB Circular A -110. The Provider shall prepare, or cause
to be prepared, all advertisements, negotiations, notices, and
documents; enter into all contracts; and conduct all meetings,
conferences, and interviews as necessary to insure compliance with
the above described procurement requirements.
3. The Provider shall be responsible for carrying out any acquisi-
tions of real property necessary for implementation of activity.
The Provider shall conduct all such acquisitions in its name and
shall hold title to all properties purchased. The Provider shall be
responsible for preparation of all notices, appraisals, and documen-
tation required in conducting acquisition under the latest appli-
cable regulations of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real
Property Acquisition Act of 1970 and of the CDBG Program. The
Provider shall also be responsible for providing all relocation
notices, counseling, and services required by said regulations.
4. The Provider shall comply with the acquisition and relocation
requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property
Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 as required under 24 CFR 570.606(a)
and HUD implementing regulations at 24 CFR Part 42; the requirements
in 24 CFR 570.606(b) governing the residential anti - displacement and
relocation assistance plan under section 104(d) of the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1974 (the Act); the relocation require-
ments of 24 CFR 570.606(c) governing displacement subject to section
104(k) of the Act; and the relocation requirements of 24 CFR
570.606(d) governing optional relocation assistance under Section
105(a)(11) of the Act, as pertaining to the activity.
5. The Provider shall maintain records for the expenditure of all CDBG
funds it receives, such records to be maintained in accordance with
OMB Circular A -110 and A -122, as applicable. All records shall be
made available, upon request of the City for monitoring by the City.
The City shall have authority to review any and all procedures and
all materials, notices, documents, etc., prepared by the Provider in
implementation of activity, and the Provider agrees to provide all
information required by any person authorized by the City to request
such information from the Provider for the purpose of reviewing the
same.
6. The Provider shall take all necessary actions required to implement
activity and to comply with any related requests by the City, it
being understood that the City has responsibility to Hennepin County
for insuring compliance with such requirements. The Provider also
will promptly notify the City of any changes in the scope or
character of activity.
7. The Provider does hereby agree to release, indemnify, and hold
harmless the City from and against all costs, expenses, claims,
suits, or judgments arising from or growing out of any injuries,
loss or damage sustained by any person or corporation, including
employees of Provider and property of Provider, which are caused by
or sustained in connection with the tasks carried out by the
Provider under this Agreement.
8. The City agrees to provide the Provider with CDBG funds in such
amounts as agreed upon in this Agreement to enable the Provider to
carry out activity. It is understood that the City shall be held
accountable to Hennepin County for the lawful expenditure of CDBG
funds under this Agreement. The City shall therefore make no
payment of funds to the Provider and draw no funds from Hennepin
County on behalf of a Provider, prior to having received from the
Provider a request for reimbursement including copies of all
documents and records needed to insure that the Provider has
complied with all appropriate requirements.
9.- The City shall be responsible for the preparation of all requests to
Hennepin County for HUD -wage rate determinations on activity. The
Provider shall notify the City prior to initiating activity,
including advertising for contractual services which will include
costs likely to be subject to the provisions of Federal Labor
Standards and Equal Employment Opportunity and related implementing
regulations.
10. The City agrees to provide technical assistance to the Provider in
the form of oral and /or written guidance and on -site assistance
regarding CDBG procedures and project management. This assistance
will be provided as requested by the Provider, and at other times,
at the initiative of the City, when new or updated information
concerning the CDBG Program is received by the City from Hennepin
County and deemed necessary to be provided to the Provider.
11. In accordance with the provisions of 24 CFR 85.43, suspension or
termination of this Agreement may occur if the Provider materially
fails to comply with any term of this Agreement. This Agreement
may be terminated for convenience in accordance with 24 CFR 85.44.
The Agreement may be terminated with or without cause by either
party hereto by giving thirty (30) days written notice of such
termination. CDBG funds allocated to the Provider under this
Agreement may not be obligated or expended by the Provider following
such date of termination. Any funds allocated to the Provider under
this Agreement which remain unobligated or unspent following such
date of termination shall automatically revert to the City.
12. Any material alterations, variations, modifications or waivers of
provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have
been reduced to writing as an amendment to this Agreement approved
by Hennepin County through its Office of Planning and Development
and properly executed by the authorized representatives of the
parties. All amendments to this Agreement shall be made a part of
this Agreement by inclusion in Exhibit 2 which shall be attached at
the time of any amendment.
13. All data collected, created, received, maintained or disseminated
for any purpose by the Provider in the performance of this Agreement
is governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minne-
sota Statutes, Chapter 13, and all other statutory provisions
governing data privacy, the Minnesota Rules implementing such act _
now in force or hereafter adopted, as well as federal regulations on
data privacy.
14. During the performance of this Agreement, the Provider agrees to the
following: In accordance with the Hennepin County Affirmative
Action Policy and the County Commissioners' Policies Against
Discrimination, no person shall be excluded from full employment
rights or participation in, or the benefits of, any program, service
or activity on the grounds of race, color, creed, religion, age,
sex, disability, marital status, affectional /sexual preference,
public assistance status, ex- offender status, or national origin;
and no person protected by applicable federal or state laws against
discrimination shall otherwise be subjected to discrimination:
15. The effective date of this Agreement is July 1, 1989. The termina-
tion date of this agreement is December 31, 1990, or at such time
as activity is satisfactorily completed prior thereto. Upon expira-
tion, the Provider shall relinquish to the City all program funds
unexpended or uncommitted for the activity.
16. Any program income as a result of the activity shall be returned
immediately to the City upon receipt and the provisions of 24 CFR
570.504 shall apply.
17. Any real property acquired or improved as a' result of activity, in
whole or in part, using CDBG funds in excess of $25,000 shall either
be:
a. Used to meet one of the national objectives in 24 CFR 570.208
until five years after expiration of this Agreement;
b. Disposed of in a manner that results in the City being
reimbursed in the amount of the current fair market value of
the property less any portion of the value attributable to
expenditures of non -CDBG funds for acquisition of, or
improvement to, the property.
18. The following standards shall apply to real property acquired or
improved as a result of activity, in whole or in part:
a. The Provider shall inform the City at least thirty (30) days
prior to any modification or change in the use of the real
property from that planned at the time of acquisition or
improvements, including disposition.
b. The Provider shall reimburse the City in an amount equal to the
current fair market value (less any portion thereof attribut-
able to expenditures of non -CDBG funds) of property acquired or
improved as a result of activity that is sold or transferred
for a use which does not qualify under the CDBG regulations.
Said reimbursement shall be provided to the City at the time of
sale or transfer of the property.
19. The Provider agrees to provide City with an annual audit report
consistent with OMB Circular A -110, Uniform Requirements for Grants
to Universities, Hospitals and Non - Profit Organizations and OMB
Circular A -122 Cost Principles for Non - profit organizations.
a. The audit report is to be provided to City on July 1 of each
year this Agreement is in effect and any findings of non-
compliance affecting the use of CDBG funds shall be satisfied
by Provider within six (6) months of the provision date.
b. The audit may not be paid from CDBG funds.
C. City reserves the right to recover from Provider the full
amount of any CDBG funds found to be improperly expended or
otherwise disallowed.
20. The Provider shall comply with the general condition of 24 CFR
570.200, particularly sections; (f) (Means of Carrying Out Eligible
Activities); and (j) (Constitutional Prohibitions Concerning
Church /State Activities).
21. The Provider as appropriate shall comply with the Lead -Based Paint
notification, inspection, testing and abatement procedures estab-
lished in 24 CFR 570.608.
Provider, having signed this Agreement, and the City of Edina having duly
approved this Agreement on , 19 _, and pursuant to
such approval the parties hereto agree to be bound by the provisions herein
set forth.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and
affixed their seals this day of , 1989.
Upon proper execution, this Agreement will be legally valid and binding.
CITY OF
STATE OF MINNESOTA
By
Mayor
and
Its
PROVIDER
By
I is &XEL'a /YP , >-Pc7�o✓
and _
Its
THIRD PARTY AGREEMENT
URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
EXHIBIT 1.
STATEMENT OF WORK
The following activity shall be carried out by the Provider under the terms of
this Agreement and the details and processes set forth below:
1. ACTIVITY: Child Day Care
2. LOCATION: ADDRESS: Citywide
CENSUS TRACT:
3. NUMBER: 032
4. BUDGET: $20,000
5. BENEFIT: L/M (Limited Clientele)
6. DESCRIPTION:
Provide child daycare assistance for Section 8 income eligible households
utilizing a sliding fee scale through an agreement with the Greater
Minneapolis Day .Care Association. Hennepin County will provide overall
program coordination.
7. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: Requirements with an "X" are applicable to this -
activity.
[ ] Supplemental Agreement
[ ] Non - Profit Agency
[ ] Public Agency
[ ] Other
An agreement must be executed with any other agency providing a service
or implementing an activity on behalf of Provider. Said agreement must
contain all pertinent sections contained in Third Party Agreement and
such other requirements as are identified herein.
[X] Schedule
Activity must be implemented in a timely manner and completed by December
31, 1990.
[X] Environmental Review Record
Per 24 CFR Part 58 Subpart E the environmental review status for this
activity has been determined as follows:
[ ]
[ ]
[X]
I
I
Exempt (EX)
Categorically Excluded (CE)
Categorically Excluded /Exempt
Assessment Required (AR)
Funds Released (FR) Date: _
(CE /EX)
[ ] Labor Standards / Eoual Employment Opportunity
All construction projects of $2,000 or more and financed in whole or part
with federal funds shall comply with the provisions of the Davis -Bacon
Act (prevailing wage), the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act
and the Copeland (Anti- Kickback) Act.
All federally funded or assisted construction contracts or subcontracts
of $10,000' or more shall comply with Executive Order 11246, Equal
Employment Opportunity, as amended, and the regulations issued pursuant
thereto, 41 CFR Part 60.
[ ] Procurement
Standards and guidelines are established in 24 CFR Part 85.36 for the
procurement of supplies, equipment, construction and services for
federally assisted programs. All procurement shall be made by one of the
following methods. The method used shall be adequately documented and
contracts shall contain standard conditions as appropriate.
- Small Purchase. (Informal Method) To be followed for the purchase
of services, supplies or other property costing in, the aggregate not
more than $25,000. If small purchase procurement is used, written _
price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of
qualified sources.
Competitive Sealed Bids. (Formal Advertising) To be followed when
the purchase /s, costing in the aggregate, exceeds $25,000. Sealed
bids shall be publicly solicited and a firm fixed -price contract is
to be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder. This method is
preferred for soliciting construction bids.
- Competitive Proposals. This method is normally used when more than
one source submits an offer, and either a fixed -price or cost -
reimbursement type contract is awarded. This method is typically
used for procuring professional services.
[ ] Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition
The standards described in 49 CFR Part 24 shall apply to activity that
involves the acquisition of real property or the displacement of persons,
including displacement caused by rehabilitation and demolition.
[ ] Residential Antidisplacement and Relocation Assistance
All occupied and vacant occupiable low- moderate income dwelling units
demolished or converted to another use as a direct result of activity
shall be replaced and relocation assistance shall be provided to each
displaced low- moderate income household in accordance with the Urban
Hennepin County CDBG Program Anti - displacement and Relocation Assistance
Policy, pursuant to Section 104(d) of the Housing and Community Develop-
ment Act of 1974, as amended.
[ ] .Property Management
The standards described in 24 CFR Part 570.505 Subpart J shall apply to
all real property which was acquired or.improved in whole or in part
using CDBG funds in excess of $25,000. These standards apply for a
period of five (5) years after the termination of this agreement.
[X] Low and Moderate Income
Using the applicable Section 8 income limits established by HUD, it shall
be demonstrated that a low- and moderate - income activity so indicated in
5. Benefit, above, meets one of the four criteria of 24 CFR Part 570.208,
relating to:
[ ] Area Benefit
[X] Limited Clientele
[ ] Housing
[ .] Job Creation or Retention
[ ] Prevention or Elimination of Slums and Blight
It shall be demonstrated that a slum and blight activity so indicated in
5. Benefit, above, meets one of the following criteria: -
] Area Determination. The boundaries of the slum or blighted area
must be defined and meet the requirements of 24 CFR Part 570.208
(b)(1).
[ ] Spot Basis. The specific conditions of blight or physical decay not
located in a slum or blighted area must be described.
[ ] Urgent Community Need
It shall be demonstrated that an urgent need activity, so indicated in 5.
Benefit. above, is designed to alleviate a recent (within 18 months)
condition which poses a serious and immediate threat to the health or
welfare of the community.
[ ] Other Requirements
A
A.
0-
.�y REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
• ,��RPON`��O •
1888
To:
KENNETH ROSLAND
Agenda Item #
From:
CRAIG LARSEN
Consent
❑
CITY PLANNER
-
Information Only
Fx]
Date:
SEPTEMBER 18, 1989
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
0
To Council
TRAVEL DEMAND
MANAGEMENT (TDM) IN
Action
El
Motion
494 CORRIDOR
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
NO ACTION
Info /Background:
The City Council's 1989 -1990 work program includes development of a TDM
Ordinance. The program calls for a progress report in September.
The Joint Powers Organization (the 5 494 communities) has initiated the process
developing a TDM Ordinance which would apply uniformly to all communities
in the corridor. A timetable for Ordinance development is attached for
Council information.
TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT MODEL ORDINANCE GOALS
Develop a TDM (Transportation Demand Management) model ordinance which has a core
group of strategies to be applied uniformly to all I -494 Corridor Commission
communities.
Specific goals of the model ordinance are:
* Reduce peak hour single occupancy vehicle trips
* Easy to understand
* Can be administered with minimum City staff additions
* Focuses on highest payback strategies
* Meshes with regional strategies
- ramp metering and HOV bypas lanes
- HOV lanes
- LRT and feeder bus network
- Increased suburban transit
Results oriented
* Depends upon private sector participation
* Developed through consensus among the Corridor Commission communities -
,4
1 -494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION (JPO)
DEVELOPMENT OF MODEL TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) ORDINANCE
Review Community Attitude Toward
TDM
* Consultant Input
Establish Goals
# JPO, Improve - 494, RTB,
Met Council Review
Survey Existing TDM Ordinances
Develop TDM Strategy
#
Prepare Draft Model Ordinance
#
Prepare Final Model Ordinance
Attorney Review
Adopt by JPO
Present to City Council
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
5 100A 17 1fi91
a
2_
•,
Agenda Item VIII.G
M E M 0 R A N D.0 M
TO: Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Animal Control Policy on Raccoons
The current Edina Animal Control policy regarding raccoons
provides for active trapping and disposition of the animal when
it is inside a home, when it is determined to be sick or injured,
or when it is involved in bites. In other cases, homeowners are
advised of steps they can take to deal with raccoons (see
attached supplemental,information).
The rationale for this policy comes from both a legal and
workload basis. State law allows that only a homeowner can
remove protected animals that are doing damage. Edina could
apply for a permit from the Department of Natural Resources (DNR)
allowing for the transport and destruction of raccoons for
residents. The City of Minnetonka has recently done this with
the expectation of increased raccoon complaints. Many other
cities, including Bloomington, have a similar policy to Edina's.
Secondly, the resources necessary to deal with even the number of
current calls is beyond our allocations. Traps, persons to set
and monitor the traps, and the time necessary to dispose of the
animals would be a significant change in service level.
Lastly, many people consider raccoons a part of urban wildlife
that should not be tampered with.
My recommendation is to maintain the current policy. If it were
to change to a more aggressive trapping program, the current
animal control emphasis on dog and cat protection would be
eroded.
If you have further questions or direction, please contact me.
CRAIG SWANSON
CHIEF OF POLICE
EDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT
CGS:nah
t
ATTACHMENT 1
Supplemental Information
Raccoon - related calls for service:
- Approximately 50 -60 calls per month - early spring to
early winter.
40% - sightings in yard, on deck, on roof, etc.
33% - in garbage, raiding garden
5% DOA sighting
2% - in house
less than 1% - bite, fight with dog or cat
10% - in chimney
5% - in their trap
5% - sick, injured, dragging leghold trap, etc.
Advice given to residents:
- renting, buying trap & removing raccoons themselves (in
accordance with DNR regulations)
- chemical repellants
- relocating trash cans, dog food dishes, etc.
- eliminating roof access
- hire a chimney sweep or use trouble light for raccoons in
chimney
- hiring private trapper (critter control or individuals
who have such an interest)
Current State Statute:
97B.655 TAKING ANIMALS CAUSING DAMAGE. `
Subdivision 1. Owners and occupants may take certain animals. A person may
take mink, squirrel, rabbit, hare, raccoon, lynx, bobcat, fox, or beaver on land owned
r ` or occupied by the person where the animal is causing damage. The person may take
the animal without a license and in any manner except by poison, or artificial lights in
the closed season. Raccoons may be taken under this subdivision with artificial lights
during open season. A person that kills mink, raccoon, lynx, bobcat, fox, or beaver
under this subdivision must bring the entire animal to a conservation officer or
employee of the division within 24 hours after the animal is killed.
Subd. 3. Special permit for taking protected wild animals. The commissioner may
issue special permits under section 97A.401, subdivision 5. to take protected wild
animals that are damaging property. A person must have the required license and seals
to take beaver L -rder the permit.
History: 1986 c 3S6 art 2 s 53
September 13, 1989
Mr. Gordon Hughes
Edina City Hall
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Mr. Hughes:
Let me tell you what the expansion of the Braemar Park Golf Course has
meant for us.
We have been invaded by a herd of deer -- as many as seven of whom
spend entire days not 75 feet from our back door. Last summer in a ten
day period we trapped eight raccoon in a Have -A -Heart trap on our patio.
Two months ago there was a fox at the birdfeeder outside our family room
window.
Once the novelty and amusement of harboring a mini -zoo in the backyard
have worn off -- what's the impact? First property damage: a deer trail
runs across the yard; trees are stripped, small plants and shrubs are
destroyed and new growth is devoured (we planted 250 tulip bulbs -- six
survived to flower). Then the emotional trauma of coming face to face
with a large animal in your yard.. These deer have become quite brazen.
They often startle us at night in the driveway and last week an injured doe
limped past me at mid- morning. I want my backyard to be safe-for my
grandchildren to play in -- and it isn't now. Finally, and most importantly,
the health hazard of Lyme disease. My husband has already exhibited
symptoms and although two tests have proved negative, the diagnosis is still
not clear.
What can be done? This situation cannot be allowed to continue. It is
clearly getting worse and as with many other problems in life, it will not
go away if it is ignored. For our part -- we are in the process of fencing in
a portion of the yard. This is expensive and of course there's no guarantee
it will keep out the deer. All this to protect ourselves from wild animals in
a suburban Edina setting! How ridiculous.
-2-
Since our problem appears to be. a direct result of the city's decision to
expand Braemar, it would also seem that the city has an ethical and fiscal
responsibility to correct the problem.
What can you do to help?
Sincerely,
O
Margaret Good
6308 Loch Moor Drive.
Edina, MN 55435
cc: Editor Sun C Zl1'YeRf
'1
I Spur Road
Edina, MN 55435
September 14, 1989
Mr. Craig Swanson
Chief of Police
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Officer Swanson:
During the past month I have received two citations for violation of Ordinance 312, section
29j, for having a dog which disturbed the peace and quiet of someone. After reviewing the
wording of this section of the ordinance, I have concluded that it may cause an unnecessary
burden to our animal control officers. It also may encourage people to bring marginal
complaints, or even to harass the dog's owner.
I propose that the Council amend the wording of Ordinance 312, section 29j to require the
complaining party to notify the owner in writing of the disturbance and disclose their name
and address. Alternatively, the animal control officer should be required to disclose the
name and address of the complaining party on a warning of violation. A reasonable
waiting period should be required in either instance before a citation could be issued.
I believe such a change would encourage the complaining party and the animal's owner to
discuss the situation and work out a solution. Only failing an effective solution would the
police need to become involved. I believe this would reduce our officers' workload and
reduce the potential for frivolous or harassing complaints.
I also believe the animal licensing process could be made more effective by notifying
owners of previously licensed animals by mail of the need to renew, and enclosing
directions and forms necessary to complete the process by mail. I believe license revenue
would increase and citizens would appreciate being relieved of the need to come to City
Hall to comply.
I trust you will consider these suggestions for early action. I will contact each of you by
phone in the next two weeks to discuss your position and how to muster popular support
for these proposals.
Sincerely,
Je
Roge H. Dreher
cc: Peggy Kelly
Jane L. Paulus
Bernard G. Rice, Jr.
Fredrick S. Richards
Glenn Smith
VTTT _ M
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor Richards & Council Members
FROM: Edina Human Relations Commission
SUBJECT: ETHNIC DINNER
DATE: September 18, 1989
As a step toward our goal of reaching out in order to promote understanding of
each other, the Edina Human Relations Commission wants to sponsor an Ethnic
Dinner to celebrate the diversity and cultural heritage within our community.
The Commission will be asking the Edina School District to join us as a
co- sponsor. The Commission is asking the City Council to endorse and approve
this event.
If approved, the celebration will take place on Sunday, January 21, 1990.
Braemar Clubhouse and Edinborough are both being considered as potential sites
for the celebration.
Elected officials will be asked to join the Commission in serving as hosts for
the event.
Thank you for your interest.
HRC /sw
Agenda Item IX.A
RON CLANK ,
5114 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD I EDINA, MN 55435 6121831 -2225
'August 31,, 1989
�+�' try �.' •,I it I. i,�, � -.I 1. -{ �, �,. I,y,l I i I i � ! I i ,la i i,'i i L, I_ I It '" ilj IhII I "I 1
�j1•
J I' "
�I r1' Mr Craig Larsen
a( �i I Planning Director
City of Edina
1 {�
rl^ ti 14801 West 50th Street i .I I'-
I I, j! I + ' .
�'�if'ii'ki , + I :I ! ,i` J,+• I ' L;: 1....• * +.
{Edina ' MN 55424 ! a I
1^ r•5111�Iti,�aI +I ", + .t1.1, 151 � I ,:1 (� �.3i 1 � ,, i, ,� „ l I ' . I � i:' .+ t i'i j � i v ,; i � � � 1 I �l I�
Re Single Family Moratorium
I ' +'
ti
11J
y Dear Mr Larsen.
We underst
an d the City of Edina will review and consider ' new submittal
requirements to accompany future single family subdivision applications.
ICI, i,
♦.;.,,,,'During a recent meeting, you provided -a draft copy of these proposed requirements: l'
!As you know, we have recently conducted a .neighborhood informational meeting
{.`,, :''concerning the Montessori Academy and Performing Arts Center. The proposed'use of
I. ,y.:
this property, "as discussed with yourself and Mr. Rosland, includes both single
,I ;family detached homesites and an attached townhome component.' Since our meetings
;I', " with the area residents and yourself,:''I have authorized the preparation' of
'engineering plans including grading and utility design,' as well as commissioning
an architect to deal specifically with the townhome floor plan and elevations.
. -
We intend to submit to . the City an application' for preliminary. plan,`'PRD 3f
1Ciat'
,♦rezoning, comprehensive plan amendment `and ;perhaps a' setback ',variance 'on 1 r'a �•�
I ; fSeptember 13, 1989 in anticipation of the September 27, 1989 Planning Commission
{d;jmeeting t
Yew �� irol i��rl q 'a.q 1� +) ,I • i ;, ti+ �.. � .� `'` � '' ( I ,+r. I i ' �. a is i; I ',: } rt_ I {.r r`,' �^ 1, . ' , :.:,,.F ' ..' � I, ,.+'
in `recent `conversations with you, „we. have a basic understanding as ' to the �'`'1► i
(existence of the moratorium on single_ ,,family subdivisions We furthermore
understand the intent of the proposed submission requirements for single family
"subdivision applications and we believe the plans we have prepared meet the spirit 17
and intention of the proposed regulations. i ;a °
We respectfully request the City terminate the moratorium by adopting regulations
deemed appropriate and necessary to control future single family subdivision, or
if further study is required, to consider the exemption of the Wooddale Montessori
Redevelopment from the current moratorium based on the fact that this site
proposal may be distinctly different from others which precipitated the need for
the moratorium. Please enter this letter into the City Record.
in st r gards
/ onald E. Clark
REC /cw
''r1 91 A•
e
• • � ~�RPOMt�v •
lees
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER
Agenda Item #
IX.B
From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK
Consent
0
Information Only
❑
Date: SEPTEMBER 14, 1989
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject: PETITION FOR PERMANENT
❑X
To Council
STREET SURFACING .: A' . -.- -
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
To refer the petition for permanent street surfacing for Lincoln Drive to
the Engineering Department for processing.
Info /Background:
The attached petition was received from the property-owners in Interlachen
Hills 3rd Addition requesting permanent street surfacing and curb to be
constructed on Lincoln Drive.
DATE =�E(s7 61 "lf -- K % , 1989
PETITION FOR PERMANENT STREET SURFACING AND CURB
r
TO THE HONORABLE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA:
The undersigned being owners of not less than 51% in frontage of the real
property abutting on the following streets in said City:
Lincoln Drive between SEE aTTA C.11C O and"
between and
between and
between and
between and
do hereby petition that said portion of said streets be improved by CONSTRUCTION
OF PERMANENT STREET SURFACING AND CURB therein, and that the cost of said
improvement be assessed against abutting property, as authorized by Chapter
398, Laws of Minnesota, 1953, as amended.
rrf-", -ex 4iar -a,,,,��}} W g�.
Aq- LEGAL DESCRIPTION
SIGNATURE OF OWNERS ADDRESS OF.PROPERTY
-(Aj ke a- 1 4
(! e;Lnp Cl/VC' w follows
All of Lot 1, Block 2, and that part of Lot 2, Block 2, INTERLACHEN HILLS 3RD
ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, described as follows:
Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Lot 2; thence South 0 degrees 02
minutes 00 seconds West, assumed bearing, along the West line of said Lot 2,
a distance of 207.17 feet; thence South 89 degrees 58 minutes 00 seconds
East, a distance of 355.00 feet; thence North 41 degrees 34 minutes 58
seconds East, a distance of 199.34 feet to the Easterly line of said Lot 2;
thence North 40 degrees 11 minutes 31 seconds West, along the Easterly line
of said Lot 2, a distance of 13.61 feet to a point of curve in said Easterly
line; thence Northwesterly a distance of 58.23 feet along said Easterly
line, being a tangential curve, concave to the East, having a radius of
323.28 feet and a central angle of 10 degrees 19 minutes 13 seconds, to the
Northeast corner of said Lot 2; thence North 89 degrees 58 minutes 00
seconds West, a distance of 445.02 feet, along the North line of said Lot 2
to the point of beginning.
0060)
X t ketj20 5201, 5205, 5211, 5215, 5221 and 5xxx (PIN#30- 117- 21 -33-
J Lincoln Dr.4 ve follows
Lots L 2, 3, 4 and 5, Block 1, INTER LACHEN HILLS 3RD ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof.
Those parts of Lot 2, Block 2, Out lot A and vacated Lincoln Drive, all in INTER LACHEN HILLS 3RD ADDITION, according tot he recorded plat thereof, described as folloA
Commencing at the northeast corner of said Lot 1, Block 1; thence South 77 degrees 07 minutes 56 seconds West, along the northerly line of said Loll, a
distance of 227.31 feet t o t he northwest corner of said Lot 1, being the point of beginning of the land being described; thence South 0 degrees 11 minutes
19 seconds East, a distance of 92.110 feel; thence South 52 degrees 25 minutes 51 seconds West, a distance of 186.55 feet to an intersection with the northerly
extension of the west lines of Lots 29 through 35, in said Block 1; thence South 0 degrees 11 minutes 19 seconds East, along said extended line, a distance of
115.00 feet to the northwest corner of L o t 35 in said Block 1; thence South 89 degrees 58 minutes 00 seconds East, a distance of 155. 00feel t o t he westerly
line of said vacated Lincoln Drive; thence southerly along said westerly line of vacated Lincoln Drive to the southeast corner of Lpt 34, in said Block 1:
thence east to the southwest corner of Lot 5, in said Block L being the easterly line of vacated Lincoln Drive; thence northerly along said easterly line of
vacated Lincoln Drive, to the point of beginning.
This petition was circulated by Norman P. Bjornnes, Jr.
SPONSORS OF PETITIONS PLEASE NOTE: THE COUNCIL HAS ASKELI THAT PETITIONS BE
SIGNED BY OWNERS OF 60A OF ABUTTING PROPFRTThS WIIMFVFR PnR14TAT.F..
W,k&C.(2-
- - -+Me c)ogc� "D o� da���v, 9pp¢4iuTi�is,�o -
_.._. _ow,cQ �nope smcQ ee� _._. _...
7 -G -S9
pu,x
<riA.
�y
^ lass
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor and Council
From: John Wallin
Finance Director
Date: September 18, 1989
Subject: Resolution Relating to
General Obligation Tax Increment
Refunding Bonds, Series 1989
Agenda Item #XIII.A.
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
El
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
0
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Approve resolution relating to General Obligation Tax Increment
Refunding Bonds, Series 1989; Authorizing the Issuance and Providing
for the Public Sale Thereof. Subject to reaffirmation at the previously
scheduled October 2, 1989 public hearing.
Info /Background:
See Attached.
:.
Info /Background
During the past several years the tax - exempt bond market has
experienced substantial changes in interest levels. When the
bonds were purchased originally, the net interest cost was
8.9 %. In March of 1987 when the Council first considered
refunding the bond issue, the net interest cost was in the
area of 6.5 %. This reduction in interest rates was short
lived, and before the City could act on it the rates
increased substantially. It was then decided to wait until
the rates again declined to a rate that would make refunding
the bonds feasible.
On April 15, 1988, the City Council again held a public
hearing on the advance refunding of the 1985 Tax Increment
Bonds. This time rates did not fall enough to produce the
targeted $400,000 of present value savings that the Council
originally determined to be the minimum savings that would
make a refunding feasible.
At present, interest rates have fallen and the market demand
for municipal bonds is high. One or both of these conditions
could change quickly and again the City would have missed an
opportunity to realize the $400,000 of targeted present value
savings. Therefore, I recommend that the City Council pass
the resolution authorizing the issuance and providing for the
public sale of General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding
Bonds, Series 1989 at the October 16, 1989, City Council
meeting.
At the September 5, 1989 Council meeting, a public hearing
was called for on October 2, 1989. According to the City's
bond counsel, there is no problem in authorizing the issuance
and providing for the public sale before the public hearing
has-been held. The Council may still decide to cancel the
sale at the public hearing, or at anytime up to the actual
sale of the bonds on October 16, 1989.
Member introduced the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION RELATING TO GENERAL OBLIGATION
TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1989;
AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND PROVIDING
FOR THE PUBLIC SALE THEREOF
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Edina, Minnesota (the City), as follows:
1. Authorization. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Section 469.178 and Chapter 475 the City has issued its General
Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985 (the Series 1985
Bonds) in the original principal amount of $12,000,000. The
Series 1985 Bonds are presently in the amount of $11,850,000.
The City presently estimates that it can effect a substantial
annual debt service savings by refunding the outstanding bonds
described above which are callable for redemption and
prepayment by the City in advance of their maturities in
accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.67; and the
City hereby authorizes the issuance and sale of up to
$ in aggregate principal amount of general
obligation refunding bonds, the proceeds of which, together
with other available moneys of the City, shall be used for this
purpose, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.52.
2. Terms of Bonds; Sale Meeting. There has been
presented to-this Council forms of a Statement of Terms and
Conditions for Receipt of Bids and Award of Sale, and a notice
of sale for publication, which are attached hereto, and which
are hereby approved and shall be placed on file by the City
Clerk. Each and all of the provisions of the Statement of
Terms for Receipt of Bids and Award of Sale are hereby adopted
as the terms and conditions' of the refunding bonds and of the
sale thereof; and this Council shall meet at the time specified
therein for the purpose of considering sealed bids for the
purchase of the refunding bonds.
3. Publication of Notice. The City Clerk is
authorized and directed to cause the notice of sale to be
published in the Edina Sun- Current, a legal newspaper of
general circulation in the City, and in Northwestern Financial
Review, once not less than ten days before the date of the
meeting.
4. Official Statement. The City Finance Director, in
cooperation with Public Financial Systems, Inc., financial
consultants to the City, is hereby authorized and directed to
prepare on behalf of the City an official Statement to be
distributed to potential purchasers of the refunding bonds.
Such official statement shall contain the Statement of Terms
and Conditions for Receipt of Bids and Award of Sale and such
other information as shall be deemed advisable and necessary to
adequately describe the City and the security for, and terms
and conditions of, the refunding bonds.
Attest:
City Clerk
Mayor
,,SEP -15 -1989 15:06 FROM PUBLIC FIN. SYSTEMS TO
99275032 P.02
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE
(Prelfmfnary)
$1391159000*
GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1989
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
Sealed bids for the purchase of $13,115,000* General Obligation Tax Increment
Refunding Bonds, Series 1989 (the Bonds) of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the
City) will be received at the offices of Public Financial Systems until 11:00
a.m., on Monday, October 16, 1989, when they will be opened, read and tabu-
lated. The bids will be presented to the City Council for consideration at a
meeting to be held at the City Hall at 7:00 p.m. on the same date. This is a
statement of the terms and conditions upon which the bids for the Bonds will
be received, the sale thereof awarded and the Bonds issued.
Prose
The Bonds will be issued for the purpose of refunding and redeeming certain
General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds of 1985, in the principal amount of
$12,000,000 in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapters
475.
Type, Denomination and Maturiti-es
The Bonds will bear a date of original issue as of November 1, 1989, will be
in fully registered form and in denominations of $5,000 or any integral
multiple thereof, of single maturities, and will mature on January 1 in the
following years and amounts:
e r
A= unt
Year
Amount
Year
Amount
1991 $
250,000
1996
1,050,000
2001
1,110,000
1992
170,000
1997
1,050,000
2002
1,095,000
1993
220,000
1998
1,040,000,
2003
1,080,000
1994
230,000
1999
1,030,000
2004
1,060,000
1995
550,000
2000-
1,020,000
2005
1,090,000
2006 1,070,000
* The City reserves the right to increase or decrease the aggregate amount of
principal by an amount not to exceed $ and the maximum amount of
change in any single year shall not be more than $ If the issue
size is changed, the premium and /or discount, if any, and the purchase price
will be adjusted proportionately.
-1-
SEP -15 -1989 15 :06 FROM PUBLIC FIN. SYSTEMS TO 99275032 P.03
Re.___ demnti_on
The Bonds maturing in 1997 and subsequent years will each be subject to
redemption and prepayment, at the option of the City, in whole or in part and
if in part in inverse order of maturities and by lot within a maturity, on
January 1, 1996 and any interest payment date thereafter, at a price equal to
the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus accrued interest to the date
of redemption.
I terest Payment Dates and Rates
Interest will be payable on July 1, 1990 and semiannually thereafter on each
January 1 and July 1, to the registered owners of the Bonds appearing of
record in the bond register as of the close of business on the 15th day
(whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month. All Bonds
of the same maturity must bear interest from date of original issue until paid
at a single, uniform rate, not exceeding the rate specified for Bonds of any
subsequent maturity. Each rate must be expressed in an integral multiple of
1/8 or 5/100 of 1 %, not exceeding the rate specified for Bonds of any subse-
quent maturity.
Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent
and Paving Agent
The City will designate and contract with a bank, financial institution or
trust company to act as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the
Registrar). The Bond Registrar will be kept, principal and interest will be
paid to the registered owner of each Bond and transfers of ownership will be
effected by the Registrar. The City will pay the reasonable and customary
charges of the Registrar for such services. The City reserves the right to
remove the Registrar and appoint a successor.
iv
Within 40 days after the sale, the City will deliver to the Registrar the
printed Bonds ready for completion and authentication. The original purchaser
of the Bonds must notify the Registrar, at least five business days before
delivery of. the Bonds, of the persons in whose names the bonds will be
initially registered and the authorized denominations of the Bonds to be
originally issued. If notification is not received by that date, the Bonds
will be registered in the name of the original purchaser and will be issued in
denominations corresponding to the principal maturities.of the Bonds. On the
day of closing, the City will furnish to the purchaser the opinion of bond
counsel hereinafter described, an arbitrage certification and a certificate
verifying that no litigation in any manner questioning the validity of the
Bonds is then pending or, to the best knowledge of officers of the City,
threatened. Payment for the Bonds must be received by the City at its desig-
nated depositary on the date of closing in immediately available funds.
IWM
JCr -l.: -1707 i ✓ - U rfCJI I rUGLiI, r1H. Gi- JIrzri:D IU 1' l'L- �
7�r�_�- r'. L14
Leaal Opinion
An opinion as to the validity of the Bonds will be furnished by Dorsey &
Whitney, of Minneapolis, Minnesota and will be printed on the Bonds. The
legal opinion will state that the Bonds are valid and binding general obliga-
tions of the City enforceable in accordance with their terms, except to the
extent to which enforceability may be limited by state or United States laws
relating to bankruptcy, reorganization, moratorium or creditors' rights.
Type of Bid and Award
Sealed bids must be mailed or delivered to the undersigned and must be
received prior to the time established above for the opening of bids. Each
bid must be unconditional. A good faith deposit in the amount of $
must be submitted with each bid. The good faith deposit must be in t�orm
of a certified or cashiers check or bank draft. The good faith deposit will
be retained by the City as liquidated damages if the bid is accepted and the
bidder fails to comply therewith. The good faith - deposit will be returned to
the purchaser at the closing for the Bonds. The bid authorizing the lowest
net interest cost (total interest from date of Bonds to stated maturities less
any cash premium or plus any discount) will be deemed the most favorable. No
oral bid and no bid of less than $ plus accrued interest on all of
the Bonds will. be considered and the City reserves the right to reject any and
all bids and to waive any informality in. any bid. The Purchaser of the Bonds
will be required as a condition of the sale to execute and submit to the City
as a part of its bid, a Certificate in a form satisfactory to the City as to
the initial offering price of the Bonds to the public (not including bond
houses and brokers or similar persons or organizations acting in the capacity
of underwriters or wholesalers) at which price a substantial amount of the
Bonds (not less than ten percent (10% of each maturity) will be sold, and
certifying that the prices will not be greater than as shown on the Certifi-
cate and that the prices are not unreasonably low.
CUSP K uJ tubers
The City will assume no obligation for the assignment or printing of CUSIP
numbers on the Bonds or for the correctness of any numbers printed thereon,
but will permit such numbers to be assigned and printed at the expense of the
purchaser, if the purchaser Waives any delay in delivery occasioned thereby.
Information for and bidding forms may be obtained from the undersigned
or from Public Financial Systems, Inc., 512 Nicollet Mall, Suite 550, Min-
neapolis, Minnesota, 55402; telephone 612 -333 -9177, financial consultants to
the City.
Dated: September 18, 1989.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
- 3 -
TnTAI . P. 04
Recycied paper ..'
A.
BROWNING- FERRIS INDUSTRIES
NORTHWEST-REGION
Date: September 7, 1989
To: Public Officials in rnnesota
From: Tom Vandervoo
Divisional Vice esident, Public Affairs
Re: The Politics of Waste Disposal
Attached is a column entitled "The Politics of Waste Disposal" by
Browning- Ferris Industries' Chairman and CEO, William D.
Ruckelshaus, which appeared in the September 5, 1989 Wall Street
Journal.
The column provides our company's perspective on the fact that
technical solutions to waste disposal problems exist, but are
caught up in difficult political, realities. Mr. Ruckelshaus
suggests a means of finding solutions through a process which
allows involved parties to:
1. agree on values
2. develop incentives
3. enable institutions to carry out decisions.
I hope this column will be helpful as you consider public policy
affecting waste disposal. BFI has a significant amount of
information on environmentally and economically sound waste
disposal systems which we will be happy to share. Please contact
me if you would like our input.
TV /nae
attach.
P.O. BOX 1375 • MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55440 • (612) 921 -8505 • FAX (612) 921 -8558
8500 NORMANDALE LAKE BOULEVARD, SUITE 850 • BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55437
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 5, 1989
6P
The Politics ofW aste Disposal
By WILLIAM D. RUCKELSHAUS
The problem of solid-waste disposal in
America is not that the Industry does not
know how to solve It. We know how to op-
erate a system that would satisfy the most
ardent environmentalist, and still allow us
to make money. No, our problem has to do
with values, public priorities and trade-
offs. Private enterprise is trying to mesh
with a set of public processes, and there Is
sand In the gears.
More than a third of the nation's la id-
fills will be full within the next decade.
New York will exhaust its capacity in nine
years, Los Angeles In six, and Philadelphia
Is out of capacity now, and must engage in
continuous negotiations to dispose of Its
800,000 tons per year. Why? Nobody wants
garbage put down anywhere near where lie
lives, the "not- in -my- backyard" syn-
drome —the dreaded NIMBY.
It has been argued that we can recycle
waste and reduce waste at the source to
such an extent that our need for disposal
facilities will disappear. But this is pie in
the sky. The Environmental Protection
Agency estimates that by the year 2000,
55% of municipal. wastes will still have to
be landfilled. That's down from 77.5% stow,
but that still means finding a place for an
estimated 107 million tons of waste. Ten
years ago landfill disposal commonly cost
$5 to $10 a ton. Today, fees of $50 a ton are
common and $140 is not unknown.
A Worse Error
One response Is to control costs by regu-
lation —that Is, by treating the disposal In-
dustry like a utility and subjecting it to
rate regulation. This is an even worse er-
ror than supposing we don't need more
disposal capacity. In New Jersey, the state
that has pursued the public - utility option
most aggressively, the number of waste
haulers has declined from about 2,300 in
1970 to less than 650 this year, demonstrat-
ing the truth that people will not stay in
business if they can't make a living. Much
New Jersey waste Is going out of state. A
recent governor's task force there*has rec-
ommended deregulation of collection.
Free markets are not perfect, but they
are efficient allocators of services. Tile
U.S. waste - disposal system is such a sys-
tem. But It is being blocked by the other
great hinge of our free society, the right of
our citizens to determine their own fate.
Why do Americans so resist disposal fa-
cilities? And why haven't officials re-
sponded more energetically to the NIMBY
problem?
The questions are more complicated
than they seem. Granted, a landfill is not a
rose garden, but neither Is a tire factory or
a steel mill, and towns-fight to get those.
Perhaps it is the implied degradation asso-
ciated with the word "garbage." You often
see letters in rural newspapers asking why
those city folks can't take care of their own
garbage. Less subtle Is the fear that a
nearby site will lower property values.
These problems are not helped by the
typical absence of any substantive benefit
offered to a community in return for ac-
cepting a waste - disposal facility, particu-
larly from the standpoint of the commu-
nity's elected leaders. Politically, there is
no upside to supporting an incinerator or
landfill In your district or town.
From the standpoint of the state there
Is a definite benefit — indeed a necessity.
Yet state governments have been ex-
tremely reluctant to use the brute - force ap-
proach, one without which we would have
no interstate highway system. State offi-
clals don't want to seem like a Goliath
beating down some rural David over gar-
bage disposal.
But this does not explain why the states
have not set up a workable process for se-
lecting sites, explaining risks, and distrib-
uting benefits. This inaction means the
states have delegated responsibility to lo-
calities without providing the Incentives to
make waste management possible.
There are a number of reasons for the
absence of a political solution. Most Impor-
tant It is hard for people to believe in the
reality of the problem as long as the gar-
bage is picked up every day and fees are a
relatively small fraction of the average
person's Income.
A related reason is that much of Ameri-
can politics has becorpe a kind of deluonol-
ogy. We are ever ready to tar the villain. It
is much harder to find solutions when ev-
eryone shares a little of the blame, as is
the case with waste generation. For exam-
ple, while It was relatively easy to place
air - pollution controls on factories, It has al-
ways been hard to Influence individuals'
driving habits —now• a' more significant
source of air pollution in many areas.
To get anything done in a free society
three things are needed; First there has to
be agreement on a set of values, some pub-
lic consensus that there is a goal worth
pursuing. Next must come a, set of Incen-
tives, by which society can be seen to re-
ward those who pursue the values and
sanction those who do not. In market econ-
omies incentives usually involve money.
Finally, institutions must be able to adopt
the values and administer the incentives.
But after source reduction and recy-
cling are inipleuiented to their fullest, new
capacity for the residue will still be
needed. In a remarkable display of both
humility and generosity, the federal gov-
ernment has decided to let the states and
localities deal with the siting issue by
themselves. They —or, in tine breach, Indus-
try —can improve the way this is done.
Mechanisms must be established for lo-
cal choice. The public, politicians and the
media must be told of the risks of waste
disposal or incineration and how they
would be controlled, and the host coninlu-
nity must share in the benefits from the fa-
cility. It should not be surprising ilia[ peo-
ple are perfectly willing to endure some-
thing unpleasant if you pay them for it.
These principles were applied by ECOS
Inc., a company (with which I was affili-
ated) based in Washington state. Tile state
needs a hazardous - waste - handling faci]-
ity—as do many states. The company-con-
ducted a statewide screening that elimi-
nated almost 80% of Washington's area,
based on such criteria as sensitive lands
and land uses, natural hazards, transporta-
tion accessibility, and historical or archae-
ological Importance. Communities in the
remainder of the state were theft publicly
asked if they might be interested in hosting
the facility. A good number responded. Af-
ter some initial discussion, Informational
meetings were held in nine of them.
Granted, a landfill is not a rose garden, but neither is a
tire factory or a steel mill, and towns fight to get those. -
Ili the waste business, the values are in
conflict, the Incentives push mainly in the
wrong direction, and the institutions are
weak or nonexistent. We value, for exam.
pie, the convenience of products such as
disposable diapers and we value attractive
packaging. We show this at the checkout
counter, which is a powerful incentive for
the people who supply such products. We
also value the right of local people to make
local land -use decisions, and we show tills
In public meetings and in the voting booth
which is a powerful incentive for people in
political office.
The value of an efficient and fair waste -
disposal system has not been as well artic-
ulated, and there are few Incentives that
support such a value. Disposal costs are
rarely included product costs. People who
produce lots of trash rarely are charged
more than those who produce little —and if
they are, it's usually not enough to make
them change their behavior.
Nor has the consumer faced much so-
cial pressure to generate° less waste. Pro
ducers, on the other hand, give high prior-
ity to reducing the generation of waste —es-
pecially. hazardous. waste. This again
shows the power of appropriate incentives:
in this case the money lost In the form of
liability when the hazardous waste is Im-
properly discarded.
The federal government's response to
municipal waste has been focused almost
exclusively on design standards for dis!
posal facilities. Aside from these regula-
tions and some research and technical as-
sistance, the federal government believes
that its major contribution will be in en-
couraging source reduction and recycling.
This makes some sense, since it is the na-
tion's single largest customer, and changes
In Its procurement standards could stimu-
late markets for recycled materials.
Put to a Vote
The company Helped interested commu-
nities form citizen advisory committees to
represent the community at large and
serve as liaisons to the firm. These com-
mittees negotiated proposals that included
stringent environmental safeguards and
substantial economic benefits for the cone -.
munity. This March, two towns put the
proposals to a vote. In both places more
than 60016 of the voters favored accepting
the proposal and allowing (lie facility to be
opened in their community. The company
is now doing the detailed geological work -
ups, on the basis of which a single site will
be selected. Only then will it begin work on
a permit application. While this was done
for a hazardous waste facility, a similar
process would work for a municipal waste
facility.
flere. we have an example of a private
firm making Imaginative use of what is es-
sentially a political process. Political lead --
ers at the state level might well do• the
same. You may be able to take the gar•
bage out of politics, but you can't take the
Politics out of garbage.
Mr. Ruckelshaus, tivice administrator
of the EPA, is currently chairman and
CEO of Browning - Ferris Industries, a
world -wide waste - disposal company. .
1
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
261700
09/05/89
158.00
BUSINESS MACHINES
SERV CONTRACTS
261700
09/12/89
170.00
BUSINESS MACHINES
RUBBONS
328.00
*
261701
09/05/89
488.00
RIEDELL SHOES INC
SKATES
488.00
*
261702
09/05/89
99.00
BORLAND NTERNATL
SOFTWARE
99.00
*
261703
09/05/89
177,971.00
EDINA FIREARMS
FIRE STATE AID
177,971.00
*
261704
09/05/89
14.00
MARTHA EASTON
REFUND
14.00
*
261705
09/05/89
10.00
LEWIS RIDGE CONDO
REFUND
10.00
*
261706
09/05/89
207.00
MN STATE
FLOWERS
207.00
*
261707
09/05/89
64.96
TODD CORP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
64.96
*
261708
09/05/89
375.58
DPC INDUSTRIES
CHEMICALS
375.58
*
261709
09/05/89
38.09
STEVE JOHNSON
SCHOOL
38.09
*
261710
09/05/89
14.00
SUSAN DEFEE
REFUND
14.00
*
261711
09/05/89
14.00
MARGARET BOSIGER
REFUND
14.00
*
* * * * **
261714
09/11/89
120.00
MN GOVT FINANCE
CONFERENCE
261714
09/11/89
120.00
MN GOVT FINANCE
CONFERENCE
240.00
261715
09/11/89
445.00
BLEVINS CONCESSIONS
OIL PUMP
261715
09/11/89
20.00
BLEVINS CONCESSIONS
LITE SOCKETS
465.00
261716
09/11/89
25.00
MRPA
T- SHIRTS
25.00
*
261717
09/11/89
474.00
KUNDE CO
OAK WILT CONTROL
474.00
*
261718
09/11/89
4,113.50
W H CATES CONSTR INC
CONSTRUCTION
4,113.50
*
./
09 -18 -89 PAGE
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4288 - 510 -51 2283 3424
10- 4516 - 140 -14 17861 3610
28- 4248 - 704 -70 18109 3251
10- 4504 - 510 -51 37 3091
10- 3311 - 000 -00
10- 1145- 000 -00
40- 3800 - 000 -00
30- 4660- 783 -78
30- 4504 - 782 -78 290697 3479
26- 4564 - 682 -68 1057
10- 4202 - 280 -28
10- 1145 - 000 -00
10 -1145- 000 -00
10- 4202 - 160 -16
10- 4202 - 160 -16
25- 4900 - 002 -68 330192
26 -4248- 683 -68 330191
10- 4504 - 600 -60
10- 4248- 644 -64 3538
60- 1300 - 014 -20
1
* * * -CKS
2
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
09 -18 -89 PAGE
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
261719
09/11/89
1,270.50"
OUTSIDE SERV INC
TREE REMOVAL
10- 4248 - 644 -64
1644
1,270.50 *
261720
09/11/89
155.00
STERLING FENCE INC
FENCE REPAIR
40- 4248 - 803 -.80
9282 3476
155.00 *
261721.
09/11/89
200.00
MIKE RAWLINGS
PAYMENT
.30- 4201 - 781 -78
200.00
261722
09/11/89
20.94
FRANKS NURSERY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 783 -78
3525
20.94
261723
09/11/89
58.50
ERIK STANG
SERVICES
27- 4120 - 668 -66
58.50
261724
09/11/89
85.25
RUTH SCHMOLL
PETTY CASH
10- 4504 - 440 -44
85.25
261725
09/11/89
260.00
MRPA
PAYMENT
30- 4202 - 781 -78
260.00 *
261726
09/11/89
240.00
SHIRLEY BLAKE
PAYMENT ARTIST
30- 3501 - 000 -00
240.00 *
261727
09/11/89
100.00
PAT GREER
EXHIBT FEE
30- 3501- 000 -00
100.00 *
261728
09/11/89
198.00
LIX GEREBI
SKATING LESSONS
30- 3505 - 000 -00
198.00 *
261729
09/11/89
289.50
KENNY BOILER /MFG
REPAIRS
28- 4248 - 702 -70
72825 3422
289.50 *
261730
09/11/89
69.51
NAOMI JOHNSON
GENERAL SUPPLIES
23- 4504 - 612 -61
261730
09/11/89
15.53
NAOMI JOHNSON
OFFICE
2617-30
09/11/89
57.51
NAOMI JOHNSON
CRAFT "
23- 4588 - 611 -61
142.55 *
261731
09/11/89
262.00
TOBIE DICKER
AC INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201 - 611 -61
262.00 *
261732
09/11/89
113.00
KATHY GUSTAFSON
AC INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201 - 611 -61
113.00 *
261733
09/11/89
90.00
DINA OSULLIVAN
AC INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201 - 611 -61
90.00 *
261734
09/11/89
113.00
MARGARET GUST
AC INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201 - 611 -61
113.00 *
261735
09/11/89
90.00
COLLEEN HAAS
AC INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201 - 611 -61
90.00
261736
09/11/89
675.00
JEAN GRAPP
AC INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201 - 611 -61
2
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
09 -18 -89 PAGE 3
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
# MESSAGE
675.00
261737
09/11/89
90.00
AGNES FINE
AC INSTRUCTOR.
23- 4201 - 611 -61
90.00
*
261738
09/11/89
77.00
BOB CONNOLLY
AC INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201 - 611 -61
77.00
*
261739
09/11/89
133.00
MARGARET MCDOWELL
AC INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201 - 611 -61
133.00
*
261740
09/11/89
192.00
BRIDGET SULLIVAN
AC INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201 - 611 -61
192.00
261741
09/11/89
113.00
MARGARET GUST
AC INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201 - 611 -61
113.00
*
261742
09/11/89
100.00
DIANA HEDGES
SCENE WINNERAC
10- 4504 - 627 -62
100.00
*
261743
09/11/89
142.50
J KANJANAVIVITCH
CONFERENCE_
23-4202- 611 -61
142.50
*
261744
09/11/89
226.00
SUE DAVIES
AC INSTRUCTOR'
23- 4201 - 611 -61
261744
09/11/89,
28.70
SUE DAVIES
CRAFT SUPPLIES
23- 4588 - 611 -61
254.70
*
261745
09/11/89
119,610.00
HARIS BANK
BOND PAYMENT
10- 1145 - 000 -00
261745
09/11/89
450,000.00
HARIS BANK
BOND PAYMENT
10- 1145 - 000 -00
569,610.00
*
261746
09/11/89
1,595.00
CONSTROM HTG
NEW FUENACCE
11- 4201- 127 -12
1,595.00
*
261747
09/11/89
26.00
RACO OIL /GREASE
GREASE
40- 4504 - 801 -80
3503
26.00
*
261748
09/11/89
497.49
ECOMARC INC
ODOR TREAT CHEM
40- 4504 - 801" -80
3045
3452
497.49
261749
09/11/89
930.00
SOUTHSIDE ELECT
UPGRADE ELECTRIC
11- 4201 - 127 -12
930.00
*
261750
09/11/89
19.20
ABM EQUIP
BUMPER PADS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
3864
3507
19.20
261751
09/11/89
85.93
BOYER TRUCKS
REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
21831
2843
85.93
*
261752
09/11/89
31.58
CARLSON EQUIP CO
VALVE KIT
10- 4540 - 560 -56
143480
3291
31.58
*
261753
09/11/89
72.00
SP MANUFACTURUNG CO
MIRROR
10- 4540 - 560 -56
3121
72.00
261754
09/11/89
349.44
TEXGAS
PROPANE
10- 4504 - 314 -30
2612
a
.,A)
09 -18 -89 PAGE 4
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4290 - 140 -14
29- 4648 - 722 -72 3228 3407
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
* * * -CKS
09/11/89
7.00
LEAANNS SEWING
REPAIR GEAR
10- 4248 - 440 -44
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
*
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
1,400.00
ELECT OFFICE ENVIRO
349.44
27- 4248 - 662 -66
10740
261755
09/11/89
51.90
VOTER REG /ELEC SECT
POSTAGE
51.90
09/11/89
1,988.00
261756
09/11/89
364.00
OUTPOST HUNT /SPORTS
12 GUAGE AMMO
1,988.00
364.00
*
261757
09/11/89
50.00
PAT FUHR
PERFORMANCE
REFUND
10- 1145 - 000 -00
50.00
*
261758
09/11/89
75.00
KATHLEEN WALTERS
PERFORMANCE
09/11/89
75.00
*
SERVICES
261759
09/11/89
50.00
PAT FUHR
PERFORMANCE
*
50.00
*
261760
09/11/89
75.00
MAX KRAUSE
PERFORMANCE
75.00
*
*
.,A)
09 -18 -89 PAGE 4
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4290 - 140 -14
29- 4648 - 722 -72 3228 3407
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
* * * -CKS
09/11/89
7.00
LEAANNS SEWING
REPAIR GEAR
10- 4248 - 440 -44
89021
7.00
*
09/11/89
1,400.00
ELECT OFFICE ENVIRO
FOLDING CHAIRS
27- 4248 - 662 -66
10740
2069
1,400.00
*
09/11/89
1,988.00
PROWOOD
LUMBER
27- 4604 - 664 -66
2811
1,988.00
*
09/11/89
12.00
R JEFFERY KNUTSON
REFUND
10- 1145 - 000 -00
12.00
*
09/11/89
850.00
RICHARD G LARSON
SERVICES
30- 4201 - 781 -78
850.00
*
09/11/89
.12.00.
ELIZABETH COLBURN
REFUND
10- 1145 - 000 -00
12.00
*
09/11/89
120.00
AD SCHLAGEMEISTER
REPAIRS
27- 4248 - 662 -66
4288
120.00
*
09/11/89
85.00
MERLE ANDERSON
SERVICES
27- 4288 - 669 -66
85.00
*
09/12/89
28.90
MINN COMM
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226- 420 -42
9825
6581
28.90
*
09/12/89
452.48
STANDARD FUSEE CORP
SAFETY EQUIP
10- 4642 - 420 -42
3071
452.48
*
09/12/89
22.00
KATHLEEN COOK
REFUND
10- 3500 - 000 -00
22.00
*
09/12/89
7.00
JUDITH STITT
REFUND
10- 3500 - 000 -00
1989 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
261774
09/12/89
261775
09/32/89
261776
09/12/89
261777
09/12/89
261778
09/12/89
261779
09/12/89
261780
09/12/89
261781
09/12/89
261782
09/12/89
261783
09/12/89
261784
09/12/89
261785
09/12/89
261786
09/12/89
261 -787
09/12/89
261788
09/12/89
261789
09/12/89
261790
09/12/89
261791
09/12/89
AMOUNT
7.00 *
30.00
30.00 *
22.00
22.00 *
662.50
662.50 *
1,390.00
1,390.00 *
40.86
40.86 *
170.50
170.50 *
28.50
28.50 *
84.00
84.00 *
106.33
106.33 *
3,097.65
3,097.65 *
394.38
394.38 *
65.00
65.00 *
40.00
40.00 *
2,000.00
2,000.00 *
3,153.41
3,153.41 *
44.80
44.80 *
80.00
80.00 *
400.00
400.00 *
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
CYNDY WEBB
REFUND
JESSICA EDSTAM
- jESG ;GA EASTMAN
REFUND
CHRISTIAN BROS
REMOVE TREE -
MORNINGSIDE LSCAPE
LANDSCAPING
APC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
KUSTOM ELECTRONICS
LEASE
QUALITY ENGRAVING
GEN SUP RESERVES
KEN KANE
MILEAGE
MEDIA DEVELOP IND
GENERAL SUPPLIES
HENN CTY TREAS
WORKHOUSE /JAIL
HENN CTY SHERIFF
EQUIP RENTAL
MGIA
SEMINAR
ATOM
SEMINAR
DEAN BERRY ASSO
WRITING TRAINING
MIKE ANDREJKA
KITCHEN FLOOR
EDINA ART CENTER
COMMISSION
CAROLYN LONNING
PERFORMANCE
SAY IT ONCE SYSTEMS,
INC.
BWG ;NEG G Tre" "T°
DTP TRAINING
09 -18 -89 PAGE 5
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 3230 - 000 -00
10- 3500 - 000 -00
10- 1300 - 089 -23
60- 1300 - 286 -04 2196 2810
10- 4504 - 420 -42 F26225
10- 4901 - 420 -42
10- 4504 - 430 -42 1938
10- 4208 - 420 -42
10- 4504 - 434 -43 887944
10- 4286 - 220 -22 20542
10- 4226 - 420 -42
10- 4202 - 420 -42
10- 4202 - 420 -42
12- 4201 - 434 -43
11- 4201 - 127 -12
30- 3501- 000 -00
30- 4224 - 781 -78
10- 4212 - 510 -51 600
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
261792
09/12/89
* * * * **
261794
09/12/89
261795
09/12/89
261796
09/12/89
261797
09/12/89
261798
09/12/89
261798
09/12/89
261798
09/12/89
261799
09/12/89
261800
09/12/89
261801
09/12/89
261802
09/12/89
261803
09/12/89
261804
09/12/89
261805
09/12/89
261806
09/12/89
261807
09/12/89
261808
09/12/89
261808
09/12/89
261809
09/12/89
AMOUNT
220.16
220.16
276.00
276.00
58.30
58.30
200.00
200.00
314.17
314.17
87.50-
87.50
87.50
87.50 *
40.00
40.00 *
750.00
750.,00 *
17,123.75
17,123.75 *
3,040.00
3,040.00 *
1,384.31
1,384.31 *
272,598.02
272,598.02 *
88,939.40
88,939.40 *
8,361.95
8,361.95 *
5,959.08
5,959.08 *
237.02
208.40
445.42 *
30.80
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
NANCY KNUDSEN PRO SERVICES
THERES TRUNIGER
CRAIG G SWANSON
CAREER TRACK
COMM HEALTH EMS
JANE WILLIAMS
JANE WILLIAMS
JANE WILLIAMS
CITY AND STATE
MARY D WALTERS
EH RENNER & SONS
SM HENTGES & SONS
DH BLATTNER & SONS
GL CONTRACTING
MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP
BURY & CARLSON
PLBG & HEATING
MOLLIE PAULSON
MOLLIE PAULSON
BETTY PEDDIE
AMBULANCE REFUND
MEETING EXP
SEMINAR
FIRST AID SUPPLIS
SERVICES
SSERVICES
SERVICES
SUNSCRIPTION
PHONE CONSULTING
PAYMENT
PAYMENT
PAYMENT
PAYMENT
PAYMENT
PAYMENT
PAYMENT
ART WORK SOLD
PERSONNEL SERVICES
ART WORK SOLD
09 -18 -89 PAGE 6
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P-.O. # MESSAGE
28- 4224 - 707 -70
10- 3180 - 000 -00
1074206 - 420 -42
10- 4202 - 440 -44
10- 4510 - 440 -44
10- 4200 - 600 -60
10- 4200 - 600 -60
10- 4201 - 600 -60
10 -4204- 140 -14
10- 4256 - 510 -51
60- 2040 - 000 -00
60- 2040 - 000 -00
6072040 - 000 -00
60- 2040 - 000 -00
60- 2040 - 000 -00
60- 2040- 000 -00
60- 2040 - 000 -00
23- 3625 - 000 -00
23- 4120 - 613 -61
23- 3625 - 000 -00
* * * -CKS
I/
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
09 -18 -89 PAGE 7
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
# MESSAGE
30.80
261810
09/12/89
74.20
SHARON MCKISSON
ART
WORK
SOLD
23- 3625 - 000 -00
74.20
*
261811
09/12/89
511.00
BRYAN MOON
ART
WORK
SOLD
23- 3625 - 000 -00
511.00
*
261812
09/12/89
52.50
DOROTHY HALL
ART
WORK
SOLD
23- 3625 - 000 -00
52.50
*
261813
09/12/89
53.87
NANCY HAMMER
ART
WORK
SOLD
23- 3625 - 000 -00
53.87
*
261814
09/12/89
45.50
NORMA HANLON
ART
WORK
SOLD
23- 3625 - 000 -00
45.50
*
261815
09/12/89
70.00
JEAN HAEFELE
ART
WORK
SOLD
23- 3625 - 000 -00
70.00
*
261816
09/12/89
48.97
RICK GRAVROK
ART
WORK
SOLD
23- 3625 - 000 -00
48.97
*
261817
09/12/89
203.00
SUSAN FRAME
ART
WORK
SOLD
23- 3625 - 000 -00
203.00
*
261818
09/12/89
21.00
BETSY BRYANT
ART
WORK
SOLD
23- 3625 - 000 -00
21.00
*
261819
09/12/89
24.50
E HOOD ANDERSON
ART
WORK
SOLD
23- 3625 - 000 -00
24.50
*
261820
09/12/89
35.70
BETTY THOMPSON
ART
WORK
SOLD
23- 3625 - 000 -00
35.70
*
261821
09/12/89
28.50
EDINA FOUNDATION
ART
WORK
SOLD
23- 3625 - 000 -00
28.50
*
261822
09/12/89
39.20
ROSALIE WELLS
ART
WORK
SOLD
23- 3625 - 000 -00
39.20
*
261823.
09/12/89
80.00
LUCY ROSCHE
CLEANING
27- 4201 - 662 -66
847
3057
80.00.*
261824
09/12/89
209.00
PRESTO CLEANING
RUG
SHAMPOO
27- 4288 - 662 -66
3227
3529
209.00
*
261825
09/12/89
374.00
SUBURBAN SIGN CO.
SIGN
BLDG
27- 1300 - 001 -00
1332
3410
374.00
*
261826
09/12/89
720.50
HOSPITALITY SUPPLY
CHAIRS
/TABLES
27- 1300 - 001 -00
1494
720.50
*
261827
09/12/89
180.67
ANR FREIGHT
FRT
CHAIRS
27- 1300 - 001 -00
215361
1494
180.67
*
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
09 -18
-89
PAGE 8
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
# MESSAGE
261828
09/12/89
49.50
JOHNSTON SALES
REPAIRS
27- 4248 - 662 -66
78702
49.50 *
261829
09/12/89
292,817.69
LUNDA CONSTRUCTION
PAYMENT
60- 2040 - 000 -00
292,817.69 *
261830
09/12/89
3,742.07-
DEDE HENSEL
PRO SERVICES
24- 4224 - 701 -70
261830
09/12/89
3,742.07
DEDE HENSEL
PRO SERVICES
24- 4224 - 701 -70
261830
09/12/89
3,742.07
DEDE HENSEL
PRO SERVICES
28- 4224 - 701 -70
3,742.07
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
261A07
09/11/89
297.79
ALL -AMER BOTTLING
MIX
50- 4632 - 822 -82
261A07
09/11/89
71.20
ALL -AMER BOTTLING
MIX
50- 4632- 862 -86
368.99
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
261A29
09/07/89
9.02
ALBINSON
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 330 -30
582270
261A29
09/11/89
72.10
ALBINSON
PAINT
10- 4504 - 646 -64
577473
8742
81.12
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
261A36
09/11/89
46.19
AUTOMOTIVE WHSL INC
TRANS KIT
10- 4540 - 560 -56
95204
3273
46.19
* * * * **
(See also 291A39)
* ** -CKS
261A39
09/11/89
146.40
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
PADLOCK
10- 4504 - 301 -30
1704
2699
261A39
09/11/89
98.76
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
BATTERY
10- 4504- 440 -44
1702
3202
261A39
09/11/89
30.00
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
KIT SEAL
10- 4504 - 560 -56
1703
3274
261A39
09/11/89
494.61
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
HOIST REPAIR
10- 4540 - 540 -54
1701
3138
261A39
09/11/89
406.80
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
STARTER
10- 4540 - 560 -56
1700
3135
261A39
09/11/89
320.00
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
ALTERNATOR
10- 4540 - 560 -56
1712
3450
261A39
09/11/89
34.59
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
GEAR MOTOR
10- 4540 - 560 -56
1710
3447
261A39
09/11/89
182.38
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
STARTER
10- 4540 - 560 -56
1698
3114
261A39
09/11/89
457.01
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
HOIST
10- 4620 - 560 -56
1699
3128
2,170.55 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
261A41
09/12/89
661.68
AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE
MEAT
27- 4624 - 663 -66
661.68 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
261A49
09/05/89
275.98
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
10- 4262 - 440 -44
261A49
09/05/89
20.16
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
10- 4262 - 482 -48
261A49
09/05/89
110:01
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
10- 4262 - 520 -52
261A49
09/12/89
117.59
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
27- 4262 - 663 -66
261A49
09/05/89
57.80
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
50- 4262 - 821 -82
261A49
09/05/89
96.43
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
50- 4262 - 841 -84
. ,
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
261A49
09/05/89
* * * * **
SUPPLY PARTS
261A57
09/11/89
* * * * **
CREDIT
261A67,
09/11/89
* * * * **
SPEEDO
261A72
09/11/89
261A72
09/11/89
* * * * **
CONCRETE
261A91
09/11/89
* * * * **
CONCRETE
261A96
09/11/89
* * * * **
FILL MATERIAL
261A98
09/11/89
261A98
09/11/89
261A98
09/11/89
261A98
09/11/89
261A98
09/11/89
261A98
09/11/89
261A98
09/11/89
261A98
09/11/89
* * * * **
261602
09/12/89
* * * * **
261605
09/11/89
'261805
09/11/89
261605
09/11/89
261605
09/05/89
* * * * **
AMOUNT
61.08
739.05 *
140.80
140.80 *
117.56
117.56 *
25.00-
242.50
217.50 *
39.95
39.95 *
26.00
26.00 *
336.00
756.00
556.50
126.50
315.00
137.00
198.00
957.00
3,382.00 *
65.75
65.75 *
5.00
10.00
50.00
30.00
95.00
CHECK REGISTER
.
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
AMMONIA HOUSE
SUPPLY PARTS
AQUA ENGINEERING
PLOW DAMAGE
ASHLAND CHEMICAL
CREDIT
ASHLAND CHEMICAL
THINNER
AUTO SOUND /ENTRONIX
SPEEDO
AUTOMOBILE SERV CTR
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
AVR INC
CONCRETE
AVR INC
CONCRETE
AVR INC
CONCRETE
AVR INC
CONCRETE
AVR INC
CONCRETE
AVR INC
FILL MATERIAL
AVR INC
CONCRETE
AVR INC
CONCRETE
BFI PORTABLE SERV
RUBBISH REMOVAL
BACH -BILL
POSTAGE
BACH -BILL
GENERAL SUPLLIES
BACH -BILL
OFFICE SUPPLIES
BACH -BILL
MEETING EXP
.../
09 -18 -89 PAGE 9
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
50- 4262 - 861 -86
* ** -CKS
28- 4540 - 704 -70 017041 3299
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 318 -30 22143 3506
* ** -CKS
10- 4544 - 335 -30 517436
10- 4544 - 335 -30 514135 3185
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56 26566 3269
* ** -CKS
10- 4248 - 560 -56 4064 3454
* ** -CKS
10- 4528 - 314 -30 8815
10- 4528 - 314 -30 8794
10- 4528 - 314 -30 8944
10- 4528 - 314 -30 6912
10- 4528 - 314 -30 7094
40- 4518 - 900 -80
40- 4528 - 803 -80 8214
40- 4528 - 803 -80 7582
* ** -CKS
27- 4250 - 662 -66
* ** -CKS
30- 4290 - 781 -78
30- 4504 - 782 -78
30- 4516 - 781 -78
30- 4516 - 781 -78
* ** -CKS
* * * * ** * ** -CKS
261B22
09/12/89
1,289.35
BEER WHOLESALERS
BEER
27- 4630 - 663 -66
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
1,194.00
CHECK
REGISTER
BEER
09 -18
-89 PAGE 10
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.'0.
# MESSAGE
261B07
09/05/89
4,285.20
BADGER METER
INC
WATER METERS
40- 1220 - 000 -00
594822
1802
261B07
09/05/89
1,840.94
BADGER METER
INC
WATER METERS
40- 1220 - 000 -00
594825
1802
261607
09/05/89
2,916.81
BADGER METER
INC
WATER METERS
40- 1220 - 000 -00
595271
1802
261B07
09/05/89
972.27
BADGER METER
INC
METERS
40- 1220 - 000 -00
595432
1802
261607
09/05/89
27.74-
BADGER METER
INC
REFUND
40- 4540 - 807 -80
28401
261607
09/05/89
87.76-
BADGER METER
INC
REFUND
40- 4540 - 807 -80
SERVICES
10- 4100 - 430 -42
261807
09/05/89
333.28
BADGER METER
INC
METER PARTS
40- 4540 - 807 -80
595033
* * * * **
10,233.00 *
* ** -CKS
261B27
09/11/89
222.00
BERGFORD TRUCKING
LIQUOR
DEL
* ** -CKS
261B17
09/12/89
32,734.45
BFI RECYCLING
SYS
RECYCLING
10- 4226- 507 -50
10014
50- 4626 - 842 -84
261B27
32,734.45 *
463.00
BERGFORD TRUCKING
LIQUOR
DEL
50- 4626 - 862 -86
261B18
09/11/89
59.04
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
MIRROR
10- 4540 - 560 -56
57411
3120
261B18
09/11/89
61.56
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
BRAKE SHOES
10- 4540 - 560 -56
55659
3500
* ** -CKS
261B30
120.60 *
19.35
BERTELSON BROS.
INC.
PENS
10- 4504 - 120 -12
* * * * ** * ** -CKS
261B22
09/12/89
1,289.35
BEER WHOLESALERS
BEER
27- 4630 - 663 -66
261B22
09/11/89
1,194.00
BEER WHOLESALERS
BEER
50- 4630 - 822 -82
261822
09/11/89
2,535.55
BEER WHOLESALERS
BEER
50- 4630 - 842 -84
261B22
09/11/89
25,355.55
BEER WHOLESALERS
BEER
50- 4630 - 842 -84
261B22
09/11/89
25,355.55-
BEER WHOLESALERS
BEER
50- 4630 - 842 -84
261B22
09/11/89
2,690.15
BEER WHOLESALERS
BEER
50- 4630 - 862 -86
7,709.05
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
261B25
09/11/89
100.00
BENNETT -WAYNE
POLICE
SERVICES
10- 4100 - 430 -42
100.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
261B27
09/11/89
222.00
BERGFORD TRUCKING
LIQUOR
DEL
50- 4626- 822 -82
261B27-
09/11/89
392.50
BERGFORD TRUCKING
LIQUOR
DEL
50- 4626 - 842 -84
261B27
09/11/89
463.00
BERGFORD TRUCKING
LIQUOR
DEL
50- 4626 - 862 -86
1,077.50
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
261B30
09/12/89
19.35
BERTELSON BROS.
INC.
PENS
10- 4504 - 120 -12
496532
261B30
09/12/89
18.36
BERTELSON BROS.
INC.
BINDER
10- 4504- 160 -16
496532
261B30
09/12/89
32.98
BERTELSON BROS.
INC.
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42
493228
261B30
09/07/89
554.55
BERTELSON BROS.
INC.
CALCULATORS
10- 4504 - 510 -51
495220
261B30
09/12/89
193.47
BERTELSON BROS.
INC.
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
496532
261B30
09/07/89
47.83
BERTELSON BROS.
INC.
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
495221
261B30
09/12/89
17.38
BERTELSON BROS.
INC.
EASEL PAD
10- 4504 - 520 -52
496020
261B30
09/07/89
12.00
BERTELSON BROS.
INC.
OFFICE
SUPPLIES
30- 4516- 781 -78
495353 3541
261B30
09/11/89
3.80
BERTELSON BROS.
INC.
OFFICE
SUUPLIES
30- 4516 - 781 -78
469386
261B30
09/11/89
19.60-
BERTELSON BROS.
INC.
CREDIT
30- 4516 - 781 -78
880.12 *
* * * * ** * ** -CKS
09 -18 -89 PAGE 11
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4504 - 540 -54 94919 3017
27- 4248 - 667 -66 95508 3255
27- 4288 - 662 -66 95507 3254
* ** -CKS
27- 4504 - 662 -66 3481
* ** -CKS
30- 4540 - 783 -78 31895 3478
* ** -CKS
40- 4201 - 800 -80 17951
60- 1300 - 284 -04 17959
60- 1300 - 289 -04 18033
* ** -CKS
23- 4624 - 613 -61 091331 3155
23- 4624 - 613 -61 091012 2790
23- 4624 - 613 -61 091840 3159
23- 4624 - 613 -61 090957 2790
* ** -CKS
27- 4288 - 662 -66 375612 3625
* ** -CKS
40- 4540 - 803 -80 7014 2860
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56 52462 3499
* ** -CKS
10- 4210 - 140 -14 103680
* ** -CKS
10- 4566- 643 -64 2749
�
s
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
261632
09/11/89
14.54
BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS
KEYS
261632
09/11/89
159.50
BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS
REPAIRS
261B32
09/12/89
65.80
BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS
KEY /LOCK
239.84 *
* * * * **
261B50
09/12/89
399.99
BEST BUY SUPERSTORE
EQUIP
399.99 *
*it Yt *i1N
261B53
09/05/89
82.90
BAKER POOLS
REPAIR PARTS
82.90
* * * * **
26IB77
09/05/89
818.00
BRAUN ENG TESTNG INC
PRO SERV
26IB77
09/07/89
598.90
BRAUN ENG TESTNG INC
TESTING
261B77
09/12/89
125.15
BRAUN ENG TESTNG INC
PRO SERV ENG
1,542.05
* * * * **
261C01
09/05/89
119.53
C & S DISTRIBUTING
COST /GOODS SOLD
261C01
09/05/89
75.33
C & S DISTRIBUTING
COST /GOODS SOLD
261C01
09/11/89_
334.36
C & S DISTRIBUTING
COST /GOODS SOLD
261C01
09/05/89
430.35
C & S DISTRIBUTING
COST /GOODS SOLD
959.57 *
* * * * **
261C13
09/12/89
200.00
CASH REGISTER SALES
SERVICE CONTRACT
200.00 *
* * * * **
261C19
09/11/89
160.08
CEI SALES
AIRLESS HAMMER
160.08
* * * * **
261C22
09/11/89
146.08
CERT POWER TRAIN
DRIVE SHAFT
146.08
* * * * **
261C25
09/11/89
102.60
CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO
ADS FOR BIDS
102.60
* * * * **
261C27
09/05/89
402.00
CHEMLAWN
WEED SPRAYING
402.00 *
09 -18 -89 PAGE 11
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4504 - 540 -54 94919 3017
27- 4248 - 667 -66 95508 3255
27- 4288 - 662 -66 95507 3254
* ** -CKS
27- 4504 - 662 -66 3481
* ** -CKS
30- 4540 - 783 -78 31895 3478
* ** -CKS
40- 4201 - 800 -80 17951
60- 1300 - 284 -04 17959
60- 1300 - 289 -04 18033
* ** -CKS
23- 4624 - 613 -61 091331 3155
23- 4624 - 613 -61 091012 2790
23- 4624 - 613 -61 091840 3159
23- 4624 - 613 -61 090957 2790
* ** -CKS
27- 4288 - 662 -66 375612 3625
* ** -CKS
40- 4540 - 803 -80 7014 2860
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56 52462 3499
* ** -CKS
10- 4210 - 140 -14 103680
* ** -CKS
10- 4566- 643 -64 2749
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
CITY BEER BEER
CITY BEER BEER
CITY BEER BEER
CITY OF EDINA. GARBAGE BILLING
CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV
CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV
CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV
COCA COLA BOTTLING
COCA COLA BOTTLING
COCA COLA BOTTLING
COMM OF REVENUE
CONT- MINNESOTA
CONT- MINNESOTA
CONT- MINNESOTA
WINDOW CLEANING
WINDOW CLEANING
WINDOW CLEANING
MIX
MIX
MIX
FUEL TAX
SUPPLIES
CLEANING
FOOD STUFF
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. REPAIR PARTS
DANS REGISTER SERV. REPAIR REGISTER
DAVE S FOOD WAGON MILK /ICE CREAM
. �rJ
09 -18 -89 PAGE 12
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
50- 4630- 822 -82
50- 4630 - 842 -84
50- 4630 - 862 -86
50- 4250 - 821 -82 1778
50- 4248 - 821 -82
50- 4248 - 841 -84
50- 4248 - 861 -86
50- 4632 - 822 -82
50- 4632 - 842 -84
50- 4632 - 862 -86
10- 4612 - 560 -56
27- 4504 - 663 -66
27 -4512- 663 -66
27- 4624 - 663 -66
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
27- 4540 - 664 -66 17448 2884
27- 4248 - 663 -66
27- 4624 - 663 -66
* ** -CKS
3607
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
* * * * **
261C30
09/11/89
54.40
261C30
09/11/89
105.20
261C30
09/11/89
152.40
312.00 *
* * * * **
261C33
09/07/89
625.00
625.00 *
* * * * **
261C36
09/07/89
12.25
261C36
09/07/89
12.25
261C36
09/07/89
12.25
36.75
* * * * **
261C44
09/11/89
480.38
261C44
09/11/89
892.16
261C44
09/11/89-
1,001.69
2,374.23
* * * * **
261051
09/12/89
649.20
649.20
261064
09/12/89
360.16
261064
09/12/89
249.32
261064
09/12/89
4,754.21
* * * * **
5,363.69
261C89
09/11/89
10.39
10.39
* * * * **
261D19
09/12/89
159.95
159.95
261D27
09/12/89
359.60
359.60
* * * * **
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
CITY BEER BEER
CITY BEER BEER
CITY BEER BEER
CITY OF EDINA. GARBAGE BILLING
CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV
CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV
CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV
COCA COLA BOTTLING
COCA COLA BOTTLING
COCA COLA BOTTLING
COMM OF REVENUE
CONT- MINNESOTA
CONT- MINNESOTA
CONT- MINNESOTA
WINDOW CLEANING
WINDOW CLEANING
WINDOW CLEANING
MIX
MIX
MIX
FUEL TAX
SUPPLIES
CLEANING
FOOD STUFF
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. REPAIR PARTS
DANS REGISTER SERV. REPAIR REGISTER
DAVE S FOOD WAGON MILK /ICE CREAM
. �rJ
09 -18 -89 PAGE 12
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
50- 4630- 822 -82
50- 4630 - 842 -84
50- 4630 - 862 -86
50- 4250 - 821 -82 1778
50- 4248 - 821 -82
50- 4248 - 841 -84
50- 4248 - 861 -86
50- 4632 - 822 -82
50- 4632 - 842 -84
50- 4632 - 862 -86
10- 4612 - 560 -56
27- 4504 - 663 -66
27 -4512- 663 -66
27- 4624 - 663 -66
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
27- 4540 - 664 -66 17448 2884
27- 4248 - 663 -66
27- 4624 - 663 -66
* ** -CKS
3607
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
W
CHECK REGISTER
AMOUNT
27- 4200 - 664 -66
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
261D29
09/11/89
261D29
09/11/89
* * * * **
DICK NISSEN
261D33
09/12/89
261D33
09/12/89
* * * * **
WEED CONTROL
261D39
09/11/89
* * * * **
MILEAGE
261D45
09/11/89
261D45
09/11/89
* * * * **
EARL F. ANDERSON
261D61
09/11/89
* * * * **
EARL F. ANDERSON
261E02
09/12/89
261E02
09/12/89
261E02
09/12/89
261E02
09/11/89
261E02
09/11/89
* * * * **
261E14
09/12/89
261E14
09/11/89
261E14
09/12/89
261E14
09/11/89
* * * * **
261E17
09/11/89
261E17
09/11/89
261E17
09/11/89
* * * * **
261E32
09/11/89
W
CHECK REGISTER
AMOUNT
27- 4200 - 664 -66
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
262.70
27- 4200 - 664 -66
DAVIDSEN DIST. INC.
BEER
139.70
DELEGARD TOOL CO.
DAVIDSEN DIST. INC.
BEER
402.40
DICK NISSEN
100.00 *
301.87
E KRAMER & SONS INC
DAVIS- EUGENE
WEED CONTROL
51.12
E KRAMER & SONS INC
DAVIS- EUGENE
MILEAGE
352.99
27- 4200 - 664 -66
72.00
DAYTONS
72.00
27- 4200 - 664 -66
167.27
DELEGARD TOOL CO.
43.00
DELEGARD TOOL CO.
210.27 *
2975
100.00
DICK NISSEN
100.00 *
44.25-
E KRAMER & SONS INC
44.25
E KRAMER & SONS INC
44.25
E KRAMER & SONS INC
221.09
E KRAMER & SONS INC
395.18
E KRAMER & SONS INC
660.52
343.00
EARL F. ANDERSON
3,485.01
EARL F. ANDERSON
1,488.31
EARL F. ANDERSON
211.50
EARL F. ANDERSON
5,527.82 *
5,023.15
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
9,692.45
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
11,821.00
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
.26,536.60 *
649.36
EASTMAN KODAK CO
649.36
LA
09 -18 -89 PAGE 13
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
50- 4630 - 842 -84
50 -4630- 862 -86
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 600 -60
10- 4208 - 600 -60
* ** -CKS
DOCKERS 30- 4262 - 782 -78
* ** -CKS
TOOLS 10- 4580 - 560 -56 54173 3187
TOOL 10- 4580 - 560 -56 54156 3187
POLICE SERVICES 10- 4100 - 430 -42
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
HAULING SHARGES
27- 4200 - 664 -66
4981
2975
HAULING SHARGES
27- 4200 - 664 -66
4981
2975
HAULING CHARGES
27- 4200 - 664 -66
4981
2975
FILL MATERIAL
40- 4518 - 803 -80
4980
FILL MATERIAL
40- 4518 - 900 -80
5429
- 1045
PLAYGROUND EQUIP 10- 4201 - 647 -64 90995 3609
EQUIPMENT 10- 4201 - 647 -64 90913 2500
CONSTRUCTION 28- 1300 - 000 -00 90883
TRAFFIC CONE 40- 4504 - 801 -80 90149 2840
BEER
BEER
BEER
MAINT AGREEMENT
50- 4630 - 822 -82
50- 4630 - 842 -84
50- 4630 - 862 -86
10- 4288 - 510 -51
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS I
09 -18 -89 PAGE 14
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
27- 4600- 661 -66 49140 3390
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56 58914 3027
* ** -CKS
40- 4504 - 805 -80 128611 3292
40- 4622 - 805 -80 128638 1670
* ** -CKS
12- 4902 - 434 -43 54457 2539
* ** -CKS
10- 4260 - 510 -51 044248
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 510 -51 442736
* ** -CKS
27- 4540 - 664 -66 3307
* ** -CKS
10- 4262 - 301 -30
10- 4262 - 560 -56
10- 4262 - 646 -64
10- 4512 - 540 -54
28- 4262 - 702 -70
30- 4262 - 782 -78
40- 4262 - 801 -80
* ** -CKS
10- 4202 - 420 -42 6673
10- 4212 - 510 -51
* ** -CKS
9
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
* * * * **
261E84
09/11/89
926.40
ENGLAND PRESS INC.
PRINTING
926.40
* * * * **
261F05
09/11/89
78.16 72 z2
FADDEN PUMP
PUMP PARTS
78.16 * -
* * * * **
261F11
09/07/89
63.00
FEED RITE CONTROL
H2O TREAT EQUIP
261F11
09/07/89
2,915.82
FEED RITE CONTROL
WATER CHEMCALS
2,978.82
* * * * **
261F50
09/05/89
160.00
FRED G ANDERSON
BLINDS
160.00
* * * * **
261F56
09/12/89
3,590.00
FRANK B. HALL & CO.
INSURANCE
3,590.00
*
* * * * **
261F70
09/05/89
39.97
FRIDEN ALCATEL
SUPPLIES
* * * * **
39.97
*
261F76
09/05/89
762.51
FLAHERTY EQUIP CORP
ENGINE
762.51
* * * * **
261G01
09/11/89
483.92
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
261G01
09/11/89
238.65
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
261G01
09/11/89
237.12
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
261G01
09/11/89
226.68
G & K SERVICES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
261G01
09/11/89
49.44
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
261G01
09/05/89
32.16
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
261G01
09/11/89
206.60
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
1,474.57
* * * * **
261G09
09/12/89
290._00
GOVT TRAIN SERV
CONT ED
261G09
09/12/89
1,214.07
GOVT TRAIN SERV
FEE FOR SERVICES
* * * * **
1,504.07
09 -18 -89 PAGE 14
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
27- 4600- 661 -66 49140 3390
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56 58914 3027
* ** -CKS
40- 4504 - 805 -80 128611 3292
40- 4622 - 805 -80 128638 1670
* ** -CKS
12- 4902 - 434 -43 54457 2539
* ** -CKS
10- 4260 - 510 -51 044248
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 510 -51 442736
* ** -CKS
27- 4540 - 664 -66 3307
* ** -CKS
10- 4262 - 301 -30
10- 4262 - 560 -56
10- 4262 - 646 -64
10- 4512 - 540 -54
28- 4262 - 702 -70
30- 4262 - 782 -78
40- 4262 - 801 -80
* ** -CKS
10- 4202 - 420 -42 6673
10- 4212 - 510 -51
* ** -CKS
9
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
09 -18 -89
PAGE 15
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
# MESSAGE
261G24
09/12/89
54.60-
GEN. COMMUNICATIONS
RADIO REPAIRRS
10- 4248 - 440 -44
54380
1325
261G24
09/12/89
54.60
GEN. COMMUNICATIONS
RADIO REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 440 -44
54380
1325
261G24
09/12/89
54.60
GEN. COMMUNICATIONS
RADIO REPAIRRS
10- 4248 - 440 -44
54380
1325
261G24
09/11/89
13.70
GEN. COMMUNICATIONS
REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 440 -44
53853
261G24
09/11/89
84.00
GEN. COMMUNICATIONS
RADIO REPAIR
10- 4294 - 560 -56
53644
152.30
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
261G38
09/11/89
100.00
GEORGE BUTLER
POLICE SESRVICES
10- 4100 - 430 -42
100.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
261G57
09/11/89
220.50
GOPHER OIL CO.
FLOOR DRI
10- 4504 - 560 -56
379778
3282
220.50 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
261G62
09/12/89
102.00
GRANDMA S CUPBOARD
POPCORN
27- 4624 - 663 -66
102.00 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
261H03
09/11/89
130.00
HOLMSTEN ICE RINKS
RINK SUPPLIES
28- 4504 - 704 -70
3606
130.00 *
261H04
09/11/89
175.64
HACH CO.
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 803 -80
109766
3212
175.64 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
261H09
09/12/89
50.10
HALLMAN
OIL
10- 4504 - 440 -44
47071
3432
50.10
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
261H21
09/11/89
66.75 49 --6-7--
HARMON GLASS
GLASS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
189568
3461
sir
66:75*
261H22
09/11/89
100.00
HAROLD SWANSON
POLICE SERVICES
10- 41.00- 430 -42
100.00
261H23
09/12/89
5,194.00
HARRIS HOMEYER CO.
INSURANCE
10- 4260 - 510 -51
261H23
09/12/89
2,188.00
HARRIS HOMEYER CO.
INSURANCE
10- 4260 - 510 -51
261H23
09/12/89
2,771.00
HARRIS HOMEYER CO.
INSURANCE
10- 4260 - 510 -51
261H23
09/12/89
27,829.00
HARRIS HOMEYER CO.
INSURANCE
10- 4260 - 510 -51
37,982.00
* * * * **
HEDBERG AGGREGATES
* * * -C,KS
26 ima7
09/11/89
99.16
HENN TEGH -9NXRR
REPAIR PARTS
28- 4540 - 704 -70
57356
3301
99.16
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
rm:A`'
1989 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
261H61 09/12/89
k *kk *k
261H65 09/11/89
261H85 09/11/89
k k k k k k
261I49 09/07/89
k k k k k k
261I59 09/12/89
k k k k k k
261J31
09/12/89
261J31
09/12/89
261J31
09/12/89
261J31
09/12/89
261J31
09/12/89
261J31
09/12/89
261J31
09/12/89
261J31
09/12/89
261J31
09/12/89
261J31
09/12/89
261J31
09/12/89
261J31
09/12/89
261J31
09/12/89
261J31
09/12/89
261J31
09/12/89
261J31
09/12/89
261J31
09/12/89
261J31
09/12/89
261J31
09/12/89
261J31
109/12/89
261J31
09/12/89
k k k k k k
261J74 09/12/89
k k k k k k
CHECK REGISTER
AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
11.34 HODES CO. GENERAL SUPPLIS
11.34
:j
09 -18 -89 PAGE 16
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
30- 4504 - 782 -78 090369 3612
.100.00
HOFFMAN- WILLIAM
POLICE
SESRVICES
10- 4100 - 430 -42
100.00
c
38.50
HUMPHREY RADIATOR
HEATER
CORE
10- 4540 - 560 -56 3176
38.50
67.35
INMAC
PRINTER
SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 510 -51 3414
67.35
2,814.00
INTERIOR COM SYS.
MAINT CONTRACT
10- 4288 - 510 -51 24788
2,814.00
21.48
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 260 -26
17.68
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 301 -30
88.39
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 322 -30
19.89
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 390 -30
253.37
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 440 -44
125.27
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 520 -52
236.52
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 540 -54
93.44
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 560 -56
62.98
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 644 -64
44.03
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
.65
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERA
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 782 -78
51.45
JERRYS
HARDWARE
PAINT
10- 4544 - 646 -64
74.02
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
23- 4504 - 612 761
94.74
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 661 -66
15.50
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 664 -66
11.28
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERA SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 667 -66
5.34
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
29- 4504 - 721 -70
231.85
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
40- 4504- 801 -80
99.55
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
40- 4504 - 803 -80
28.98
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
40- 4504 - 807 -80
.45
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERA SUPPLIES
50- 4504 - 841 -84
1,576.86
24.12
JUSTUS
LUMBER
LUMBER /FLOWERS
27- 4504 - 666 -66 240 2980
24.12 *
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS -
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
AMOUNT
90.74
116.92
3.29
130.47
34.03
375.45
17.22
12.97
374.33
384.35
25.49
45.16
859.52
40.00
40.00 *
5,230.68
5,092.32
10,323.00 *
14.94
14.94 *
4,168.90
8,129.00
12,297.90 *
102.36
292.45
204.72
599.53
386.00
284.00
670.00
196.51
C
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
KAMAN
BEARING
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
261K09
09/11/89
261K09
09/05/89
261K09
09/11/89
261K09
09/11/89
261K09
09/11/89
BEARING
&
261K35
09/05/89
261K35
09/05/89
261K35
09/05/89
261K35
09/05/89
261K35
09/12/89
261K35
09/11/89
* * * * **
261K38
09/12/89
* * * * **
261K42
09/05/89
261K42
09/05/89
* * * * **
261K45
09/05/89
* * * * **
261K57
09/11/89
261K57
09/11/89
* * * * **
261L02
09/12/89
261L02
09/12/89
261L02
09/12/89
* * * * **
261L04
09/11/89
261L04
09/11/89
* * * * **
261L28
09/11/89
AMOUNT
90.74
116.92
3.29
130.47
34.03
375.45
17.22
12.97
374.33
384.35
25.49
45.16
859.52
40.00
40.00 *
5,230.68
5,092.32
10,323.00 *
14.94
14.94 *
4,168.90
8,129.00
12,297.90 *
102.36
292.45
204.72
599.53
386.00
284.00
670.00
196.51
C
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
KAMAN
BEARING
&
SPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
KAMAN
BEARING
&
SPLY
REPAIRS
KAMAN
BEARING
&
SPLY
REPAIR PARTS
KAMAN
BEARING
&
SPLY
PULLEYS
KAMAN
BEARING
&
SPLY
REPAIR PARTS
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNUTSON -JIM
KOCH MATERIALS CO
KOCH MATERIALS CO
KOKESH ATHLETIC
KUETHER DIST. CO
KUETHER DIST. CO
LABOR RELATIONS ASN
LABOR RELATIONS ASN
LABOR RELATIONS ASN
LAHASS
LAHASS
LAWSON PRODUCTS
HARDWARE
HARDWARE
LUMBER
LUMBER
LUMBER
REPAIRS
MILEAGE
ROAD OIL
ROAD OIL
BATHING CAPS
BEER
BEER
FEE FOR SERVICES
FEE FOR SERVICES
FEE FOR SERVICES
REPAIR BUMPER
TRAILER HITCH
ELEC CONNECTORS
v.
09 -18 -89 PAGE 17
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4504 - 560 -56
2709
28- 4248 - 704 -70 70414
40- 4540 - 801 -80
3181
40- 4540- 803 -80
2492
40- 4540 - 803 -80
2492
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 646 -64 543252 3347
10 -4504- 646 -64 526148 3205
10- 4604 - 646 -64 548848 3263
10- 4604 - 646 -64 542796 3349
27- 4504 - 666 -66 531747 3530
28- 4248 - 702 -70 542570 3429
* ** -CKS
10- 4208 - 160 -16
* ** -CKS
10- 4526- 314 -30 812661
10- 4526 - 314 -30 811971 1106
* ** -CKS
26- 4642 - 681 -68 22634
* ** -CKS
50- 4630 - 822 -82
50- 4630 - 842 -84
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 140 -14
10- 4201- 140 -14
10- 4201 - 140 -14
* ** -CKS
10- 4248- 560 -56 5473 3024
10- 4620 - 560 - 56.5530 3125
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 560 -56 2941
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
BOLTS WASHER
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
SCREWS
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
261L28
09/11/89
334.29
261L28
09/11/89
107.41
261L28
09/11/89
229.26
261L28
09/11/89
476.82
261L28
09/11/89
445.73
261L28
09/11/89
492.04
2,282.06
k * k k * k
261L36
09/07/89
273.00
273.00
*kkkkk
'
261L38
09/12/89
3,168.00
261L38
09/12/89
1,152.00
4,320.00
* k * k * k
261L46
09/12/89
196.75
196.75
k k * * k k
261L52
09/12/89
451.80
261L52
09/05/89
313.50
765.30 *
k k k k k k
261L56
09/07/89
45.00
261L56
09/12/89
9.90
54.90 *
k k k k k k
261L97
09/11/89
100.00
100.00 *
k* k k k k
261M02
09/11/89
308.67
261M02
09/11/89
271.47
580.14 *
k k * k k
261M07
09/11/89
6,330.35
261M07
09/11/89
10,994.19
261M07
09/11/89
10,792.30
28,116.84
k k* k k k
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
BOLTS WASHER
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
SCREWS
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
BITS /HOLDERS
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
PUMP BOLTS
LEFFLER PRINTING
LEITNER COMPANY
LEITNER COMPANY
LIEN INFECTION CON
LINJO ASSOC
LINJO ASSOC
LINHOFF
LINHOFF
MERFELD -BERT '
OFFICE SUPPLIES
SOIL
SEEDS /MISC
CLEANING
WATER TREAT
WATER TREATMENT
PHOTO . PROC
PHOTO PROCESS
POLICE SERVICES
MAC
QUEEN
EQUIP INC.
REPAIR PARTS
MAC
QUEEN
EQUIP INC.
REPAIR PARTS
MARK
VII
9
SALES
BEER
MARK
VII
SALES
BEER
MARK
VII
SALES
BEER
09 -18 -89 PAGE 18
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4504 - 560 -56
3049
10- 4504 - 646 -64
2940
10- 4580 - 301 -30
3193
10- 4620 - 560 -56
2943
40- 4504 - 801 -80
3047
40- 4540 - 803 -80
3048
* ** -CKS
30- 4516 - 781 -78 3827 3225
* ** -CKS
27- 4562 - 664 -66 9851
28- 4562 - 664 -66, 3326
* ** -CKS
27- 4201 - 663 -66
* ** -CKS
30- 4564 - 783 -78 12370 3614
30- 4564- 783 -78 12349 3480
* ** -CKS
12- 4508 - 434 -43 157272
12- 4508 - 434 -43 156955
* ** -CKS
10- 4100- 430 -42
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56 97780 3460
10- 4540 - 560 -56 97949 3455
50- 4630 - 822 -82
50- 4630 - 842 -84
50- 4630 - 862 -86
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
T 40
1,989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
09 -18 -89
PAGE 19
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O.
# MESSAGE
261M11
09/12/89
225.00
MARTIN - MCALLISTER
FEE FOR SERVICES
10- 4212 - 510 -51
225.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
261M14
09/12/89
7.00
MAUMA
MEETING EXP
10- 4206 - 140 -14
7.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
261M16
09/12/89
542.00
MCCAREN DESIGNS
TREES /FLOWER /SHRUBS
30- 4660 - 782 -78
1487
3398
542.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
261M19
09/07/89
107.42
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
68841
3151
107.42
* ** -CKS
261M25
261M25
09/11/89
09/11/89
18.60
18.57
MED OXYGEN & EQUIP
DEMURRAGE
10- 4274 - 440 -44
1324
37.17
MED OXYGEN & EQUIP
OXYGEN
10- 4510 - 440 -44
1324
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
261M27
261M27
09/11/89
09/11/89
302.16
464.00
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
WASH BRUSHS
10- 4504 - 560 -56
2375
3131
261M27
261M27
09/07/89
09/11/89
477.50
448.60
MERIT SUPPLY
SPRAY
PLASTIC BAGS
10- 4504 - 560 -56
10- 4504- 645 -64
22428
22443
3275
3270
261M27
09/11/89
495.00
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING AIDS
WASH /WAX
10- 4512 - 540 -54
22444
3276
261M27
261M27
09/12/89
09/12/89
103.50
MERIT SUPPLY
TOWELS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
27- 4512 - 663 -66
22376
22465
3178
3392
261M27
09/05/89
89.00
736.40
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
SPRAY
CONTRACT SERVICES
27- 4564 - 664 -66
30- 4248 - 782 -78
22529
22466
3547
261M27
261M27
09/05/89
09/12/89
485.60
478.85
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
30- 4512 - 782 -78
22462
3388
261M27
09/12/89
327.10
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
30- 4512 - 782 -78
30- 4512 - 782 -78
22494
22528
3423
3537
4,407.71 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
261M35
09/07/89.
35,862.75
METRO WASTE CONTROL
RESERVE CAP CHG
10- 3095 - 000 -00
35,862.75
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
261M42
261M42
09/05/89
09/05/89
109.67
242.12
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
10- 4524 - 301 -30
351.79
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
40- 4524 - 803 -80
* * * * **
261M46
09/12/89
21.93
METZ.BAKING CO
BREAD ROLLS
26- 4624 - 683 -68
* ** -CKS
261M46
09/12/89
A02.38
424.31 482. 96-- *
METZ BAKING CO
BREAD ROLLS
27- 4624 - 662 -66
T 40
CHECK REGISTER
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
DESCRIPTION
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
261M47
09/11/89
44.65
TOOL
REPAIR
44.65 *
* * * * **
REPAIR
MN. BAR
261M57
09/05/89
6,678.87
MIX
6,678.87 *
* * * * **
261M60
09/11/89
145.80
261M60
09/11/89
18.40
* * * * **
164.20
261M63
09/11/89
173.70
261M63
09/11/89
554.20
261M63
09/11/89
257.55
985.45
* * * * **
261M65
09/05/89
140.76
140.76
* * * * **
261M73
09/12/89
89.30
* * * * **
89.30
261M80
09/11/89
72.00
261M80
09/11/89
'- 2
261M80
09/12/89
1,682.00
261M80
09/11/89
. 75.17
1,829.17* 1, 851.ie
* * * * **
261N11
09/07/89
351.75
351.75
261N21
09/11/89
116.59
261N21
09/11/89
10.87
261N21
09/11/89
17.22
261N21
09/11/89
8.76
261N21
09/11/89
87.74
261N21
09/11/89
55.93
297.11
* * * * **
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
MIDWAY IND SUPPLY
GEAR
ASSY
MILLER - DUNWIDDIE
SERVICES
MILWAUKEE TOOL CO.
TOOL
REPAIR
MILWAUKEE TOOL CO.
TOOL
REPAIR
MN. BAR
MIX
MN. BAR
MIX
MN. BAR
MIX
MN. BLUEPRINT
MN. ELEVATOR
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
MURRAY SANDLER SUP
NAPA AUTO PARTS
NAPA AUTO PARTS
NAPA AUTO PARTS
NAPA AUTO PARTS
NAPA AUTO PARTS
NAPA AUTO PARTS
a
�b
BOOKS /PAPER
SERVICE CONTRACTS
WANT ADS
HOT DOG BUNS
PRINTING
ADS FOR BIDS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SEAT BELT
TRANS PARTS
MTR MOUNT
BEARINGS
TRANS PARTS
DOOR HANDLES
09 -18 -89 PAGE 20
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4540 - 560 -56 38021 3360
* ** -CKS
60- 1300 - 015 -20 3397
* ** -CKS
10- 4580 - 560 -56 3054
10- 4580 - 560 -56 3054
* ** -CKS
50- 4632 - 822 -82
50- 4632 - 842 -84
50- 4632 - 862 -86
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 260 -26 167099 3384
* ** -CKS
30- 4288 - 782 -78 080432 3611
* ** -CKS
10- 4212 - 510 -51
26- 4624 - 683 -68 1698
30- 4600 - 781 -78
60- 1300 - 289 -04
* ** -CKS
28- 4504 - 704 -70
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 560 -56 603157 3366
10- 4540 - 560 -56 499196 3484
10- 4540 - 560 - 56.498558 3184
10- 4540 - 560 -56 499734 3207
10- 4540 - 560 -56 499145 3484
10- 4620 - 560 -56 497601 3113
* ** -CKS
1989 CITY
OF EDINA.
CHECK NO.
DATE
261N33
09/11/89
k * *kkk
2789
261N48
09/05/89
k k * * * k
1636
261N50
09/05/89
261N50
09/11/89
k k k k k k
10- 4288 - 510 -51
261N56
09/11/89
* k k k * k
261N68
09/11/89
261N68
09/11/89
261N68
09/11/89
k k k k k k
3169
261N82
09/05/89
261N82
09/05/89
261N82
09/05/89
k k k k k k
3168
261017
09/05/89
261017
09/05/89
261017
09/05/89
261017
09/05/89
261017
09/05/89
261017
09/05/89
261017
09/05/89
261017
09/05/89
261017
09/12/89
k k k k k k
261024 09/12/89
k k k k k k
261030 09/12/89
AMOUNT
228.40
228.40
29.07
29.07
508.85
333.82
842.67 *
11.53
11.53 *
442.26
351.54
511.38
1,305.18 *
48.84
97.74
99.11
245.69 *
30.00
94.50
189.00
103.50
180.00
103.50
180.00
115.00
387.00
1,382.50 *
224.00
224.00 *
221.69
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
NELSON RADIO COMM SIREN REPAIR
NO STAR TURF PARTS
NO STAR WATERWORKS
NO STAR WATERWORKS
NORTHERN POWER PROD
NORTHSTAR ICE
NORTHSTAR ICE
NORTHSTAR ICE
NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY
NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY
NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY
OFFICE PRODUCTS
OFFICE PRODUCTS
OFFICE PRODUCTS
OFFICE PRODUCTS
OFFICE PRODUCTS
OFFICE PRODUCTS
OFFICE PRODUCTS
OFFICE PRODUCTS
OFFICE PRODUCTS
OFFSET PRINTING
OLD DUTCH FOODS
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIRS
CARE KIT
MIX
MIX
MIX
09 -18 -89 PAGE 21
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4620 - 560 -56 15342 3456
* ** -CKS
27- 4540 - 664 -66 162090 3337
* ** -CKS
40- 4540 - 803 -80 32463 2590
40- 4540 - 803 -80 32485 3022
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56 238408 3117
50- 4630 - 842 -84.
50- 4632 - 822 -82
50- 4632 - 862 -86
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
COST /GOODS SOLD
23- 4624 - 613 -61
163302
3157
COST /GOODS SOLD.
23- 4624 - 613 -61
163157
2789
COST /GOODS SOLD
23- 4624 - 613 -61
160038
1636
* ** -CKS
SERVICE CONTRACT
10- 4288 - 510 -51
088809
3169
SERVICE CONTRACTS
10- 4288 - 510 -51
088804
3167
SERVICE CONTRACT
10- 4288 - 510 -51
088807
3169
SERVICE CONTRACTS
10- 4288 - 510 -51
088808
3167
SERVICE
10- 4288 - 510 -51
088806
3168
SERVICE CONTRACTS
10- 4288 - 510 -51
088803
3167
SERVICE CONTRACTS
10- 4288 - 510 -51
088805
3166
SERVICE CONTRACT
10- 4288 - 510 -51
088802
3168
NEW EQUIP
10- 4902 - 510 -51
089837
3252
* ** -CKS
PRINTING 10- 4600 - 420 -42 30165 2996
* ** -CKS
POTATO CHIPS 27- 4624 - 663 -66
`I
09 -18 -89 PAGE 22
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
27- 4504 - 666 -66 91645 3527
* ** -CKS
30- 4248 - 782 -78
40076
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
10- 4201 - 800 -80
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
40- 4201 - 800 -80
221.69
* * * * **
10- 4201 - 260 -26
7561 9432
10- 4201 - 260 -26
261036
09/12/89
497.25
OLSON CHAIN & CABLE
CHAIN
27- 4624 - 661 -66
497.25 *
50- 4632 - 822 -82
* * * * **
50- 4632 - 842 -84
50- 4632 - 862 -86
261050
09/05/89
1,915.98
OWENS SERVICE CO
CONTRACT REPAIRS
10- 4510 - 440 -44
A95071 3233
1,915.98 *
* * * * **
28- 4504 - 702 -70
666317
261P11
09/11/89
69.00
PARK NIC MED CTR
HEARING TEST
261P11
09/11/89
69.00
PARK NIC MED CTR
HEARING TEST
261P11
09/11/89
69.00-
PARK NIC MED CTR
HEARING TEST
261P11
09/11/89
69.00
PARK NIC MED CTR
HEARING TEST
138.00
* * * * **
261P22
09/12/89
900.00
PAVEMENT MGMT SYS
PRO SERV ENG
261P22
09/12/89
7,200.00
PAVEMENT MGMT SYS
PRO SERV ENG
8,100.00
* * * * **
261P30
09/12/89
922.35
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
PEPSI
261P30
09/11/89
182.43
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
MIX
261P30
09/11/89
456.29
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
MIX
261P30
09/11/89
255.81
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
MIX
1,816.88
* * * * **
261P44
09/12/89
62.50
PHYSIO CONTROL
PAIENT CABKE
62.50
* * * * **
261P58
09/11/89
27.20
PLUNKETTS
PEST CONTROL
27.20 *•
* * * * **
261P72
09/07/89
636.20
POWER SUPPLY CO.
PRESSURE GUAGE
636.20
* * * * **
261P78
09/11/89
52.00
PRINTERS SERV INC
BLADE SHARPENEING
52.00
* * * * **
09 -18 -89 PAGE 22
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
27- 4504 - 666 -66 91645 3527
* ** -CKS
30- 4248 - 782 -78
40076
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 301 -30
10- 4201 - 800 -80
10- 4201 - 800 -80
40- 4201 - 800 -80
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 260 -26
7561 9432
10- 4201 - 260 -26
7544 9432
* ** -CKS
27- 4624 - 661 -66
50- 4632 - 822 -82
50- 4632 - 842 -84
50- 4632 - 862 -86
* ** -CKS
10- 4510 - 440 -44
A95071 3233
* ** -CKS
28- 4504 - 702 -70
666317
* ** -CKS
40- 4504 - 803 -80
85074 3361
* ** -CKS
28- 4274 - 704 -70
41524
* ** -CKS
09 -18 -89 PAGE 23
.ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4504 - 430 -42 1212
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 490 -49 27442 3223
* ** -CKS
28- 4600 - 701 -70 034771 3601
28- 4600 - 701 -70 034665 3327
* ** -CKS
10- 4226 - 440 -44 14732
* ** -CKS
10- 4262 - 301 -30 204969
* ** -CKS
10- 4618 - 560 -56 10092 3020
30- 4504 - 782 -78 10462 3543
* ** -CKS
50- 4630 - 822 -82
50- 4630 - 862 -86
* ** -CKS
27- 4248 - 663 -66 7038 3633
* ** -CKS
10- 4510 - 440 -44 080580
10- 4510 - 440 -44 080258 3240
10- 4510 - 440 -44 080594 2525
10- 4901 - 440 -44 080338 2918
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 440 -44 1344 1320
27- 4564 - 664 -66 3406
4
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
261P81
09/12/89
164.50
PRESSWRITE TROPHIES
GEN SUP RESERVES
164.50 *
* * * * **
261P84
09/05/89
494.01
PRO INSTANT PRINT
BLDG INSP SLIPS
494.01 *
* * * * **
261Q22
09/12/89
137.69
QUIK PRINT
PRINTING
261Q22
09/05/89
188.60
QUIK PRINT
PRINTING
326.29 *
261R13
09/11/89
132.00
RADIO INSTALLS
RADIO RENTAL
132.00 *
* * * * **
261R21
09/11/89
81.55
RED WING SHOES
SHOES
81.55 *
* * * * **
261R25
09/11/89
145.80
RENTAL EQUIP & SALES
OIL 2 CYCLE
261R25
09/07/89
105.00
RENTAL EQUIP & SALES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
250.80
* * * * **
261R33
09/11/89
5,990.80
REX DISTR.
BEER
261R33
09/11/89
5,563.70
REX DISTR.
BEER
11,554.50
* * * * **
261R35
09/12/89
100.30
RICHFIELD PLUMB CO
REPAIR SINK
100.30
261849
09/12/89
16.97
ROAD RESCUE
BULBS
261R49
09/12/89
45.50
ROAD RESCUE
BLADE
261R49
09/12/89
89.83
ROAD RESCUE
AMBULACNE SUPP
261R49
09/11/89
1,845.50
ROAD RESCUE
LIGHT BAR
1,997.80
* * * * **
261R53
09/11/89
36.00
ROBERT B. HILL
SALT
261R53
09/12/89
59.40
ROBERT B. HILL
SALT
95.40
09 -18 -89 PAGE 23
.ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4504 - 430 -42 1212
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 490 -49 27442 3223
* ** -CKS
28- 4600 - 701 -70 034771 3601
28- 4600 - 701 -70 034665 3327
* ** -CKS
10- 4226 - 440 -44 14732
* ** -CKS
10- 4262 - 301 -30 204969
* ** -CKS
10- 4618 - 560 -56 10092 3020
30- 4504 - 782 -78 10462 3543
* ** -CKS
50- 4630 - 822 -82
50- 4630 - 862 -86
* ** -CKS
27- 4248 - 663 -66 7038 3633
* ** -CKS
10- 4510 - 440 -44 080580
10- 4510 - 440 -44 080258 3240
10- 4510 - 440 -44 080594 2525
10- 4901 - 440 -44 080338 2918
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 440 -44 1344 1320
27- 4564 - 664 -66 3406
4
1989 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT
kkkkkk
w
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
261R79
09/12/89
506.25
RTW INC.
SUPPLIES
28 -4516- 701 -70 838560 3526
506.25
SUPPLIES
28- 4516- 701 -70 907325 3604
OFFICE
SUPPLIES
28- 4516 - 701 -70 958864 3425
261R81
09/05/89
128.55
RUBENSTEIN & ZIFF
SERVICES
10- 4100 - 430 -42
128.55
261S03
09/11/89
146.63
S.T. ROBB
146.63
kkkkkk
.
261S15
09/12/89
19.62
SEARS
19.62
*kkkk k
261S26
09/12/89
9,981.00
SEXTON
9,981.00
261S27
09/11/89
138.95 '"°
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
138.95* --2s -*
k k k k k k
261S32
09/05/89
79.•30 - ?5 -89--
SOFTWARE FIRST
79.30* -*
k k k k k k
261S36
09/11/89
5,558.75
SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO
261S36.
09/11/89
12,466.65
SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO
.
18,025.40
k k k k k k
261S45
09/11/89
22.50
ST. PAUL BOOK
261545
09/12/89.
46.50
ST. PAUL BOOK
261S45
09/11/89
26.86
ST. PAUL BOOK
k k k k k k
95.86
261S50
09/11/89
100.00
JOHN SHEPARD
100.00 *
261S51
09/12/89
69.75
ST PAUL CANDY /TABAC
69.75 *
kkkkkk
FEE FOR SERVICES
COST /GOODS SOLD
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CUTTER
09 -18 -89 PAGE 24
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
10- 4226 - 510 -51
* ** -CKS
23- 4624 - 613 -61 143011 2791
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 646 -64 50895 3177
* ** -CKS
27- 4540- 666 -66 2979
* ** -CKS
INSTALLATION 27- 1332 - 000 -00 1396 1095
PAINT 10- 4504 - 322 -30 3111
* ** -CKS
SOFTWARE UTILITY 10- 4233 - 440 -44 27374 3222
* ** -CKS
BBER 50- 4630 - 822 -82
BEER 50- 4630 - 842 -84
CIGARS 27- 4624 - 663 -66 14948
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
OFFICE
SUPPLIES
28 -4516- 701 -70 838560 3526
OFFICE
SUPPLIES
28- 4516- 701 -70 907325 3604
OFFICE
SUPPLIES
28- 4516 - 701 -70 958864 3425
* ** -CKS
POLICE
SERVICES
10- 4100 - 430 -42
CIGARS 27- 4624 - 663 -66 14948
* ** -CKS
09 -18 -89 PAGE 25
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4212 - 510 -51
10- 4212 - 510 -51
23- 4214 - 611 -61
* ** -CKS
10- 3095 - 000 -00
10- 3113 - 000 -00
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 260 -26
* ** -CKS
40- 4540 - 801 -80 3346
40- 4540 - 803 -80 3293
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 520 -52
* ** -CKS
27- 4624 - 663 -66 12495 3600
27- 4624 - 663 -66 12490 3421
10- 4504 - 643 -64 32933 3129
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 644 -64
10- 4208 - 644 -64
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 220 -22
10- 4201 - 220 -22
50- 4630 - 862 -86
* ** -CKS
10- 4610 - 560 -56 469788 3469
•d
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
261S54
09/12/89
190.50
STAR TRIBUNE
WANT ADS
261554
09/07/89
506.45
STAR TRIBUNE
WANT ADS
261554
09/05/89
68.00
STAR TRIBUNE
ADVERTISING
764.95
261S61
09/07/89
3,330.72
STATE TREASURER
BLDG REPORTS
261561
09/07/89
143.00
STATE TREASURER
BLDG REPORTS
3,473.72
261573
09/12/89
3,142.75
STRGAR - ROSCOE -FAUSH
PRO SERV ENG
3,142.75
* * * * **
261578
09/11/89
220.67
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
REPAIR PARTS
261S78
09/11/89
47.35
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
REPAIR PARTS
268.02
261T08
09/11/89
38.14
TARGET
FILM FOR CAMERA
38.14
* * * * **
261T10
09/12/89
423.90
TERRY ANN SALES CO.
COVERS
261T10
09/12/89
394.40
TERRY ANN SALES CO.
CUPS
818.30
*
261T11
09/05/89
262.63
TESSMAN SEED & CHEM.
TOOLS
262.63
*
* * * * **
261T13
09/05/89
1,695.00
TOM HORWATH
FORESTRY
261T13
09/05/89
127.20
TOM HORWATH
MILEAGE
1,822.20
* * * * **
261T29
09/07/89
921.00
THOMSEN - NYBECK
LEGAL
261T29
09/07/89
12,497.10
THOMSEN- NYBECK
LEGAL
13,418.10
*
261T30
09/11/89
18,209.05
THORPE DISTR.
BEER
18,209.05
*
* * * * **
261T40
09/11/89
97.19
TOLL COMPANY
WELD SUPPLIES
09 -18 -89 PAGE 25
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4212 - 510 -51
10- 4212 - 510 -51
23- 4214 - 611 -61
* ** -CKS
10- 3095 - 000 -00
10- 3113 - 000 -00
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 260 -26
* ** -CKS
40- 4540 - 801 -80 3346
40- 4540 - 803 -80 3293
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 520 -52
* ** -CKS
27- 4624 - 663 -66 12495 3600
27- 4624 - 663 -66 12490 3421
10- 4504 - 643 -64 32933 3129
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 644 -64
10- 4208 - 644 -64
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 220 -22
10- 4201 - 220 -22
50- 4630 - 862 -86
* ** -CKS
10- 4610 - 560 -56 469788 3469
•d
V 09 -18 -89 PAGE 26
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
27- 4580 - 664 -66 031426 3336
* ** -CKS
27- 4540 - 664 -66 19947 3304
* ** -CKS
10 -4612- 560 -56 T12643
10- 4612 - 560 -56 T12778 3364
10- 4612 - 560 -56 T12778 3364
10- 4612 - 560 -56 T12778 3364
* ** -CKS
23- 4624 - 613 -61 344570 3156
* ** -CKS
60- 1300 - 005 -20 27596 3440
60- 1300 - 005 -20 27547 3441
* ** -CKS
50- 4632 - 842 -84
50- 4632 - 862 -86
* ** -CKS
10- 4266- 430 -42
* ** -CKS
30- 4288 - 782 -78 3542
* ** -CKS
28- 4612 - 704 -70
* ** -CKS
26- 4624 - 683 -68 270593 9676
27- 4624- 663 -66 270593 9676
28- 4624- 703 -70 270593 9676
* ** -CKS
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
261T40
09/05/89
24.75
TOLL COMPANY
TOOLS
121.94
* * * * **
261T42
09/05/89
27.00
TOOLS BY OLSEN
MOWER PARTS
27.00
* * * * **
261T53
09/05/89
7,600.19
2,964.08
TRACY OIL
TRACY OIL
GASOLINE
GASOLINE
261T53
261T53
09/07/89
09/07/89
3,964.08-
TRACY OIL
GASOLINE
261T53
09/07/89
3,964.08
TRACY OIL
GASOLINE
10,564.27 *
* * * * **
261T66
09/11/89
28.47
TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT
COST /GOODS SOLD
28.47 *
* * * * **
261T74
09/05/89
475.00
TURF SUPPLY CO.
SEED
SEED
261T74
09/05/89
343.00
TURF SUPPLY CO.
818.00
* * * * **
261T88
09/11/89
145.50
TWIN CITY HOME JUICE
MIX
261T88
09/11/89
16.32
TWIN CITY HOME JUICE
MIX
161.82
* * * * **
261U08
09/05/89
490.00
UNIFORM UNLIMITED
RESERVE PATCHES
490.00
* * * * **
261U30
09/11/89
42.00
US WEST PAGING
SERVICE CONTRACT
42.00
* * * * **
261V10
09/11/89
198.49
VALLEY INDUSTRIAL
LP FUEL
198.49
* * * * **
261V15
09/05/89
88.12
VAN PAPER CO.
CUPS
CUPS
261V15
09/05/89
2,487.12
VAN PAPER CO.
261V15
09/05/89
466.12
VAN PAPER CO.
.CUPS
3,041.36 *.
* * * * **
V 09 -18 -89 PAGE 26
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
27- 4580 - 664 -66 031426 3336
* ** -CKS
27- 4540 - 664 -66 19947 3304
* ** -CKS
10 -4612- 560 -56 T12643
10- 4612 - 560 -56 T12778 3364
10- 4612 - 560 -56 T12778 3364
10- 4612 - 560 -56 T12778 3364
* ** -CKS
23- 4624 - 613 -61 344570 3156
* ** -CKS
60- 1300 - 005 -20 27596 3440
60- 1300 - 005 -20 27547 3441
* ** -CKS
50- 4632 - 842 -84
50- 4632 - 862 -86
* ** -CKS
10- 4266- 430 -42
* ** -CKS
30- 4288 - 782 -78 3542
* ** -CKS
28- 4612 - 704 -70
* ** -CKS
26- 4624 - 683 -68 270593 9676
27- 4624- 663 -66 270593 9676
28- 4624- 703 -70 270593 9676
* ** -CKS
AMOUNT
750.00
250.00
1,000.00 *
2,160.00
369.44
2,529.44 *
43.34
43.34 *
61.68
61.68 *
496.76
496.76 *
100.00
100.00 *
3.60
3.60 *
255.15
255.15 *
80.85
80.85 *
171.00
171.00 *
48.78
48.78 *
i
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
261V43
09/07/89
261V43
09/07/89
kkkkk
REPAIR PARTS
261V46
09/07/89
261V46
09/11/89
* * k * k k
MILEAGE
261WO8
09/12/89
* k k * k
POLICE SERVICES
261W10
09/05/89
261W11
09/12/89
kkkkk k
WELD ROD
261W15
09/11/89
* k k k * k
PARTS
261W28
09/11/89
kkkkkk
261W41
09/12/89
k * *_kkk
261W44
09/11/89
kkkkk k
261W49
09/11/89
kkkkk k
261W66
09/11/89
kkkkk k
AMOUNT
750.00
250.00
1,000.00 *
2,160.00
369.44
2,529.44 *
43.34
43.34 *
61.68
61.68 *
496.76
496.76 *
100.00
100.00 *
3.60
3.60 *
255.15
255.15 *
80.85
80.85 *
171.00
171.00 *
48.78
48.78 *
i
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
VERSATILE VEHICLE
LEASE
VERSATILE VEHICLE
LEASE
VESSCO
REPAIR PARTS
VESSCO
FLUORIDE PUMP
W.W. GRAINGER
VALVE
WALKER - MERWIN
MILEAGE
W. GORDON SMITH
GASOLINE
WALTER JOHNSON
POLICE SERVICES
WATER PRODUCTS
REDUCER
.WEST PHOTO
PHOTO SUPPLIES
WEST WELD SUPPLY CO.
WELD ROD
WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
WILLIAMS STEEL
PARTS
09 -18 -89 PAGE 27
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
27- 4276 - 665 -66 3757 2014
27- 4276 - 665 -66 3758 3476
* ** -CKS
40- 4540- 801 -80 6576 2935
40- 4540 - 805 -80 6664 3199
* ** -CKS
27- 4540 - 664 -66 3418
* ** -CKS
27- 4208 - 661 -66
27- 4612 - 664 -66 42712 3393
* ** -CKS
10- 4100 - 430 -42
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56 98768 3505
* ** -CKS
10- 4508 - 420 -42 25437
* ** -CKS
10- 4610 - 560 -56 79386 2922
* ** -CKS
10- 4248 - 440 -44 19841 2949
* ** -CKS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
* ** -CKS
40
• .4. " .
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
PAGE 28
261W81
09/11/89
21.00
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
WM H MCCOY
21.00
*
kk * ikkk
14813 3266
261W92
09/11/89
100.00
* ** -CKS
WROBLESKI -HENRY
100.00
*
10- 4100 - 430 -42
291A39
09/11/89
39.40
* ** -CKS
ALTERNATOR
39.40
*
k k k k k k
955,506.81
-
5,678.41
* ** -CKS
FUND 10
2,214.90
GENERAL FUND
5,676.21
FUND 11
TOTAL
C.D.B.G.
445.00
FUND 12
520.57
COMMUNICATIONS
37,051.18
FUND 23
TOTAL
ART CENTER
9,479.23
FUND 25
369.34
CAPITAL FUND
10,247.83
FUND 26
TOTAL
SWIMMING POOL FUND
23,433.79
FUND 27
129,919.60
GOLF COURSE FUND
.704,023.79
FUND 28
TOTAL
1,884,566.66*
• .4. " .
CHECK REGISTER
09 -18 -89
PAGE 28
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
WM H MCCOY
PROPANE
10- 4504 - 314 -30
14813 3266
* ** -CKS
WROBLESKI -HENRY
POLICE SESRVICES
10- 4100 - 430 -42
* ** -CKS
ALTERNATOR
REBUILD
STARTER
10- 4540 - 560 -56
13403 3156
-
* ** -CKS
FUND 10
TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
FUND 11
TOTAL
C.D.B.G.
FUND 12
TOTAL
COMMUNICATIONS
FUND 23
TOTAL
ART CENTER
FUND 25
TOTAL
CAPITAL FUND
FUND 26
TOTAL
SWIMMING POOL FUND
FUND 27
TOTAL
GOLF COURSE FUND
FUND 28
TOTAL
RECREATION CENTER FUND
FUND 29
TOTAL
GUN RANGE FUND
FUND 30
TOTAL
EDINBOROUGH PARK
FUND 40
TOTAL
UTILITY FUND
FUND 50
TOTAL
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
FUND 60
TOTAL
CONSTRUCTION FUND
TOTAL
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
ACCOUNT N0. INV.
CHECK REGISTER
10- 4158 - 510 -51
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
213N12
09/06/89
2,393..62
MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE
INSURANCE
MANUAL
27- 4201 - 662 -66
2,393.62
27- 4201 - 664 -66
MANUAL
* * * * **
MANUAL
27- 4504 - 662 -66
MANUAL
27- 4504 - 664 -66
215700
09/06/89
55.00
U OF NEBRASKA
CONFERENCE
27- 4600 - 661 -66
MANUAL
55.00
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50- 1010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
50- 1010- 000 -00
MANUAL
215B73
09/05/89
616.60
GC PETTY CASH
SALARIES
215B73
09/05/89
329.25
GC PETTY CASH
SALARIES
215B73
09/05/89
107.64
GC PETTY CASH
SERVICES
215673
09/05/89
45.00
GC PETTY CASH
SERVICES
215673
09/05/89
25.00
GC PETTY CASH
SCHOOLS
215673
09/05/89
93.44
GC PETTY CASH
GENERAL SUPPPLIES
215B73
09/05/89
12.32
GC PETTY CASH
GENERAL SUPPLIES
215673
09/05/89
61.80
GC PETTY CASH
OFFICE SUPPLIES
215B73
09/05/89
15.50
GC PETTY CASH
REPAIR PARTS
215B73
09/05/89
33.60
GC PETTY CASH
PRINTING
215B73
09/05/89
20.85
GC PETTY CASH
CONCESISONS
1,361.00
* * * * **
216C33
09/06/89
62,000.00-
CITY /EDINA
PAYROLL TTRANSFER
216C33
09/06/89
62,000.00
CITY /EDINA
PAYROLL TTRANSFER
.00
* * * * **
216F14
09/06/89
14,052.50
FIDELITY BANK
FICA
216F14
09/06/89
1,040.79
FIDELITY BANK
FICA
15,093.29
* * * * **
220728
09/06/89
500.00
DEPT OF NAT RES
DNR FEE
500.00
*
220729
09/06/89
192.00
TREAS STATE /MN
PERMITS
192.00
*
* * * * **
221A82
09/06/89
52.02
AT &T
TELEPHONE
221A82
09/06/89
.76
AT &T
TELEPHONE
221A82
09/06/89
9.12
AT &T
TELEPHONE
221A82
09/06/89
11.72
AT &T
TELEPHONE
221A82
09/06/89
.85
AT &T
TELEPHONE
221A82
09/06/89
4.61
AT &T
TELEPHONE
79.08
221A83
09/06/89
89.29
AT &T
TELEPHONE
221A83
09/06/89
57.49
AT &T
TELEPHONE
08 -31 -89 PAGE 1
ACCOUNT N0. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4158 - 510 -51
MANUAL
* ** =CKS
40- 4202 - 800 -80
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
27- 4120 - 663 -66
MANUAL
27- 4120 - 666 -66
MANUAL
27- 4201 - 662 -66
MANUAL
27- 4201 - 664 -66
MANUAL
27- 4202 - 661 -66
MANUAL
27- 4504 - 662 -66
MANUAL
27- 4504 - 664 -66
MANUAL
27- 4516 - 661 -66
MANUAL
27- 4540 - 662 -66
MANUAL
27- 4600 - 661 -66
MANUAL
27- 4624 - 663 -66
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50- 1010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
50- 1010- 000 -00
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4149 - 510 -51
MANUAL
10- 4162 - 510 -51
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 260 -26
MANUAL
10- 4310 - 440 -44
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4256 - 510 -51
MANUAL
23- 4256 - 612 -61
MANUAL
26- 4256 - 682 -68
MANUAL
30- 4256 - 782 -78
MANUAL
50- 4256 - 821 -82
MANUAL
50- 4256 - 841 -84
MANUAL
10- 4256 - 510 -51
MANUAL
23- 4256- 612 -61
MANUAL
1989 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
221A84
221A84
* * * * **
221M98
221M98
221M98
221M98
221M98
221M98
221M98
221M98
221M98
221M98
221M98
221M98
221M98
* * * * **
221P32
* * * * **
221P70
* * * * **
221U27
221U27
221U27
221U27
221U27
221U27
221U27
221U27
221U27
221U27
221U27
221U27
221U27
221U27
221U27
221U27
221U27
* * * * **
t
3
09/06/89
09/06/89
CHECK REGISTER
AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
146.78 *
10.38 AT &T TELEPHONE
8.10 AT &T TELEPHONE
18.48 *
4)
08 -31 -89 PAGE 2
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.•# MESSAGE
10- 4256 - 622 -62
50- 4256 - 821 -82
09/06/89
59.69
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
10- 4254 - 440 -44
09/06/89
11.64
MINNEGASCO l
HEAT
10- 4254 - 520 -52
09/06/89
101.19
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
10- 4254 - 540 -54
09/06/89
76.44
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
10- 4254 - 646 -64
09/06/89
6,730.46
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
26- 4254 - 682 -68
09/06/_89
78.67
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
27- 4254 - 662 -66
09/06/89
14.88
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
27- 4254 = 664 -66
09/06/89
3.16
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
27- 4254 - 667 -66
09/06/89
96.78
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
28- 4254 - 702 -70
09/06/89
159.15
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
30- 4254 - 752 -78
09/06/89
45.50
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
40- 4254 - 801 -80
09/06/89
253.76
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
4074254 - 803 -80
09/06/89
12.86
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
50- 4254 - 861 -86
7,644.18
09/06/89
24,912.32
P.E.R.A.
INSURANCE
10- 4145 - 510 -51
24,912.32
09/06/89
400.00
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE
10- 4290 - 510 -51
400.00
09/06/89
2,930.83
US WEST COMM
TELEPHONE
10- 4256- 510 -51
09/06/89
183.19
US WEST COMM
TELEPHONE
10- 4256- 622 -62
09/06/89
88.74
US WEST COMM
TELEPHONE
10- 4256 - 628 -62
09/06/89
11.60
US WEST COMM
TELEPHONE
10- 4256- 646 -64
09/06/89
86.22
US WEST COMM
TELEPHONE
23- 4256- 612 -61
09/06/89
39.77
US WEST COMM
TELEPHONE
26- 4256 - 682 -68
09/06/89
243.55
US WEST COMM
TELEPHONE
27- 4256- 662 -66
09/06/89
50.49
US WEST COMM
TELEPHONE
27- 4256 - 664 -66
09/06/89
111.89
US WEST COMM
TELEPHONE
27- 4256 - 667 -66
09/06/89
223.84
US WEST COMM
TELEPHONE
28- 4256 - 702 -70
09/06/89
30.19
US WEST COMM
TELEPHONE
29- 4256 - 722 -72
09/06/89
557.55
US WEST COMM
TELEPHONE
30- 4256- 782 -78
09/06/89
73.47
US WEST COMM
TELEPHONE
40- 4256 - 801 -80
09/06/89
456.39
US WEST COMM
TELEPHONE
40- 4256 - 803 -80
09/06/89
120.29
US WEST COMM
TELEPHONE
50- 4256 - 821 -82
09/06/89
118.48
US WEST COMM
TELEPHONE
50- 4256 - 841 -84
09/06/89
82.91
US WEST COMM
TELEPHONE
50- 4256 - 861 -86
5,409.40
I
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
I
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK
REGISTER
08 -31 -89 PAGE 3
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
222EII
222EII
09/08/89
09/08/89
4.16-
3.33-
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
50 -3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
222EII
09/08/89
24.06-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
MANUAL
222EII
222EII
09/08/89
09/08/89
207.98
166.50
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
222E11
09/08/89
1,202.96
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
MANUAL
222EII
09/06/89
45.48
EAGLE WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
MANUAL
222EII
09/06/89
161.07
EAGLE WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 862 -86
MANUAL
1,752.44
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
222E26
222E26
09/08/89
09/08/89
6.96-
1.62-
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
222E26
09/08/89
9.56-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
MANUAL
222E26
09/08/89
31.47-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
222E26
09/08/89
5.06-
ED PHILLIPS'
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
222E26
222E26
09/08/89
09/08/89
.89-
14.43-
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
222E26
09/08/89
2.34-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
MANUAL
222E26
222E26
09/08/89
09/08/89
1.42-
1.42-
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
222E26
09/08/89
24.47-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
MANUAL
222E26
09/08/89
1.42
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
222E26
09/08/89
11.60-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
222E26
222E26
09/08/89
09/08/89
1,573.85
1,223.55
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
222E26
09/08/89
71.40
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 862 -86
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
MANUAL
222E26
222E26,
09/08/89
09/08/89
71.40
71.40-
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
222E26
09/08/89
162.38
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 862 -86
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
MANUAL
222E26
222E26
09/08/89
09/08/89
696.55
89.40
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
222E26
09/08/89
956.04
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
MANUAL
222E26
09/08/89
506.98
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
222E2,6
222E26
09/08/89
09/08/89
1,160.51
1,443.73
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
222E26
09/08/89
234.72
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
MANUAL
222E26
09/06/89
35.50
ED PHILLIPS
BEER
50- 4630- 822 -82
MANUAL
8,044.79
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
222G82
222G82
09/08/89
09/08/89
138.02-
101.32-
GRIGGS COOPER
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 822 -82
MANUAL
222G82
09/08/89
120.72-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 842 -84
50- 3700 - 862 -86
MANUAL
MANUAL
222G82
222G82
09/08/89
09/08/89
48.30-
1.26-
GRIGGS COOPER
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
222G82
09/08/89
74.95-
GRIGGS COOPER
5C- 3710 - 842 -84
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
MANUAL
222G82
222G82
09/08/89
09/08/89
167.78-
2,415.02
GRIGGS COOPER
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
222G82
09/08/89
63.14
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 822 -82
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
MANUAL
222G82
09/08/89
3,747.32
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
222G82
09/08/89
8,388.89
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
k
08 -31 -89 PAGE 4
# P.O. # MESSAGE
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV
222G82
09/08/89
.00
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 822 -82
222G82
09/08/89
9.70-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 842 -84
222682
09/08/89
.00
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 842 -84
222G82
09/08/89
.00
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 862 -86
13,952.32
* * * * **
222J62
09/08/89
.90-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
222J62
09/08/89
8.37-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
222J62
09/08/89
41.01-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
222J62
09/08/89
3.69-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
222J62
09/08/89
11.71-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
222J62
09/08/89
64.26-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
222J62
09/08/89
20.19-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
222J62
09/08/89
1.14-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
222J62
09/08/89
186.61-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
222J62
09/08/89
9.40
JOHNSON WINE•'
50- 4626 - 822 -82
222J62
09/08/89
2,050.36
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
222J62
09/08/89
3.60
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
222J62
09/08/89
369.72
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
222J62
09/08/89
16.80
'JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
222J62
09/08/89
3,214.27
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
222J62
09/08/89
41.20
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
222J62
09/08/89
9,329.71
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
222J62
09/08/89
1 .80
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
222J62
09/08/89
11.20
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
222J62
09/08/89
89.90
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
222J62
09/08/89
835.13
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
222J62
09/08/89
19.20
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
222J62
09/08/89
1,171.47
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
222J62
09/08/89
28.40
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
222J62
09/08/89
113.70
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
222J62
09/08/89
2,019.26
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
222J62
09/08/89
2.40
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
18,988.64 *
* * * * **
222P20
09/06/89
50.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
50.00 *
* * * * **
222P36
09/05/89
10.08
PETTY CASH
MILEAGE
10- 4202 - 200 -20
222P36
09/05/89
35.00
PETTY CASH
MEETING EXP
10- 4202 - 490 -49
222P36
09/05/89
31.22
PETTY CASH
MEETING EXP,
10- 4202 - 600 -60
222P36
09/05/89
39.64
PETTY CASH
MEETING EXP
10- 4206- 140 -14
222P36
09/05/89
15.00
PETTY CASH
MEETING EXP
10- 4206 - 160 -16
222P36
09/05/89
20.00
PETTY CASH
MEETING EXP
10- 4206- 200 -20
222P36
09/05/89
4.00
PETTY CASH
PARKING
10- 4208 - 120 -12
222P36
09/05/89
5.00
PETTY CASH
NOTARY REG
10- 4504 - 120 -12
222P36
09/05/89
3.70
PETTY CASH
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 490 -49
222P36
09/05/89
178.49
PETTY CASH
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 624 -62
222P36
09/05/89
5.00
PETTY CASH
PARKING
10- 4504 - 627 -62
k
08 -31 -89 PAGE 4
# P.O. # MESSAGE
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
3.71-
PRIOR
CHECK
REGISTER
222P82
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV
222P36
09/05/89
2.15
PETTY
CASH
PARKING
12- 4202 - 434 -43
222P36
09/05/89
21.23
PETTY
CASH
MEETING EXP
12- 4215 - 434 -43
222P36
09/05/89
13.93.
PETTY
CASH
SUPPLIES
26- 4504 - 682 -68
222P36
.09/05/89
9.48
PETTY
CASH
SUPPLIES
26- 4504- 682 -68
50- 4628 - 842 -84
222P82
393.92
201.00
PRIOR
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
* * * * **
222P82
09/08/89
3.71-
PRIOR
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
222P82
09/08/89
1.97-
PRIOR
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
222P82
09/08/89
4.71-
PRIOR
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
222P82
09/08/89
4.02 -
PRIOR
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
222P82
09/08/89
185.49
PRIOR
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
222P82
09/08/89
98.74
PRIOR
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
222P82
09/08/89
235.62
PRIOR
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
222P82
09/08/89
201.00
PRIOR
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
50- 4626 - 842 -84
222Q16
706.44
2,302.27
QUALITY
WINE
* * * * **
222Q16
09/08/89
61.50-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3700 - 842 -84
222Q16
09/08/89
1.92-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
222Q16
09/08/89
8.93-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
222Q16
09/08/89
46.06-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
222Q16
09/08/89
1.26-
QUALITY
WINE-
50- 3710 - 842 -84
222Q16
09/08/89
6.36-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
222Q16
09/08/89
317.75
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
222Q16
09/08/89
2,302.27
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
222Q16
09/08/89
192.15
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
222Q16
09/08/89
.00
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
222Q16
09/08/89
889.80
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
222Q16
09/08/89
125.65
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
3,701.59
* * * * **
226N16
09/06/89
923.54
NSP
POWER
10- 4252 - 301 -30
226N16
09/06/89
12,253.97
NSP
POWER
10- 4252 - 321 -30
226N16
09/06/89
10,566.44
NSP
POWER
10- 4252 - 322 -30
226N16
09/06/89
2,771.07
NSP
POWER
10- 4252 - 330 -30
226N16
09/06/89
118.05
NSP
POWER
10- 4252- 345 -30
226N16
09/06/89
113.77
NSP
POWER
10- 4252 - 358 -30
226N16
09/06/89
2,143.20
NSP
POWER
10- 4252 - 375 -30
226N16
09/06/89
1,130.24
NSP
POWER
10- 4252 - 440 -44
226N16
09/06/89
44.13
NSP
POWER
10- 4252 - 460 -46
226N16
09/06/89
1,950.85
NSP
POWER
10- 4252 - 520 -52
226N16
09/06/89
2,232.24
NSP
POWER
10- 4252 - 540 -54
226N16
09/06/89
4,155.43
NSP
POWER
10- 4252 - 646 -64
226N16
09/06/89
570.38
NSP
POWER
23- 4252 - 512 -61
226N16-
09/06/89
570.38-
NSP
POWER
23- 4252- 512 -61
226N16
09/06/89
570.38
NSP
POWER
23- 4252 - 612 -61
226N16
09/06/89
1,262.49
NSP
POWER
26- 4252 - 682 -68
226N16
09/06/89
6.37
NSP
POWER
27- 4252 - 664 -66
226N16
09/06/89
32.09
NSP
POWER
27- 4252 - 667 -66
226N16
09/06/89
9,179.50
NSP
POWER
30- 4252 - 782 -78
fto
08 -31 -89 PAGE 5
# P.O. # MESSAGE
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
08 -31 -89 PAGE 6
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
226N16
09/06/89
3,074.33
NSP
POWER
POWER
40- 4252 - 801 -80
40- 4252 - 803 -80
MANUAL
MANUAL
226N16
226N16
09/06/89
09/06/89
37,554.11
476.74
NSP
NSP
POWER
40- 4252 - 804 -80
MANUAL
226N16
09/06/89
780.41
NSP
POWER
POWER
50- 4252 - 821 -82
50- 4252 - 841 -84
MANUAL
MANUAL
226N16
226N16
09/06/89
09/06/89
1,295.91
595.64
NSP
NSP
POWER
50- 4252 - 861 -86
MANUAL
93,230.90
* ** -CKS
* * * * **
227C51
09/05/89
.20-
COMM OF REV
REV
SALES
SALES
TAX
TAX
10- 3357 - 000 -00
10- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
MANUAL
227C51
227C51
09/05/89
09/05/89
76.94
92.25
COMM OF
COMM OF REV
SALES
TAX
23- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
227C51
09/05/89
247.39
COMM OF REV
SALES
SALES
TAX
TAX
23- 3357 - 000 -00
26- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
MANUAL
227C51
227C51
09/05/89
09/05/89
2,343.44
2,114.54
COMM OF REV
COMM OF REV
SALES
TAX
26- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
227C51
09/05/89
6,257.02
COMM OF REV
SALES
TAX
27- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
MANUAL
227C51
09/05/89
14,041.93
61.33
COMM OF REV
COMM OF REV
SALES
SALES
TAX
TAX
27- 3357 - 000 -00
28- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
227C51
227C51
09/05/89
09/05/89
35.14
COMM OF REV
SALES
TAX
28- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
227C51
09/05/89
109.00
COMM OF REV
OF REV
SALES
SALES
TAX
TAX
29- 3357 - 000 -00
29- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
MANUAL
227C51
227C51
09/05/89
09/05/89
88.45
155.85
COMM
COMM OF REV
SALES
TAX
30- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
227C51
09/05/89
196.68
COMM OF REV
SALES
TAX
30- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
227C51
09/05/89
503.50
COMM OF REV
SALES
TAX
40- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
MANUAL
227C51
09/05/89
761.43
COMM OF REV
COMM OF REV
SALES
SALES
TAX
TAX
40- 3357- 000 -00
50- 3357 - 001 -00
MANUAL
227C51
227C51
09/05/89
09/05/89
2,751.56
7,597.09
COMM OF REV
SALES
TAX
50- 3357 - 001 -00
MANUAL
227C51
09/05/89
14,676.30
COMM OF REV
SALES
SALES
TAX
TAX
50- 3357 - 002 -00
50- 3357 - 002 -00
MANUAL
MANUAL
227C51
227C51
09/05/89
09/05/89
6,026.63
6,720.04
COMM OF REV
COMM OF REV
SALES
TAX
50- 3357 - 003 -00
MANUAL
227051
09/05/89
14,297.28
COMM OF REV
SALES
TAX
50- 3357 - 003 -00
MANUAL
79,153.59
* ** -CKS
* * * * **
227E11
09/08/89
20.97-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
MANUAL
227E11
227EII
09/08/89
09/08/89
5.32-
11.76-
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
227E11
09/08/89
2.48 -.
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
50- 3710 842 -84
MANUAL
MANUAL
227E11
227EII
09/08/89
09/08/89
4.57-
24.21-
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
-
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
227E11
09/08/89
3.96-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
227E11
09/08/89
1.80-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
MANUAL
227E11-
227EII
09/08/89
- 09/08/89
265.85
1,048.41
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
227E11
09/08/89
228.27
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
MANUAL
227EII
227EII
09/08/89
09/08/89
587.91
124.14
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
227EII
09/08/89
198.04
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
MANUAL
227E11
227E11
09/08/89
09/08/89
90.00
1,210.28
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
227E11
09/06/89
70.42
EAGLE WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
MANUAL
3,748.25
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
08 -31 789 PAGE 7
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
227E17
09/08/89
25.00
EASTSIDE BEV
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
25.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
227E26
09/08/89
1.60-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
227E26
09/08/89
12.52-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
227E26
09/08/89
5.03-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
227E26
09/08/89
17.78-
ED PHILLIPS
50 -3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
227E26
09/08/89
2.55-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
227E26
09/08/89
6.25-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
227E26
09/08/89
.77-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
227E26
09/08/89
.51-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
227E26
09/08/89
1.28-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
227E26
09/08/89
6.19-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
227E26
09/08/89
2.99-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
227E26
09/08/89
17.58-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
227E26
09/08/89
17.13-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
227E26
09/08/89
10.17-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
227E26
09/08/89
80.31
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
227E26
09/08/89
889.08
ED.PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
227E26
09/08/89
64.20
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
227E26
09/08/89
149.80
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
227E26
09/08/89
856.54
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
227E26
09/08/89
255.15
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
227E26
09/08/89
1,252.69
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
227E26
09/08/89
18.20-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
227E26
09/08/89
503.73
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
227E26
09/08/89
625.62
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
227E26
09/08/89
24.95-
ED PHILLIPS
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
.227E26
09/08/89
77.31
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
227E26
09/08/89
51.51
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
227E26
09/08/89
619.78
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
227E26
09/08/89
1,758.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
227E26
09/08/89
1,017.85
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
8,056.07
* ** -CKS
227G82
09/08/89
22.60-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
227G82
09/08/89
105.37-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
227G82
09/08/89
63.65-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 = 842 -84
MANUAL
227682
09/08/89
12:67-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
227G82
09/08/89
69.32-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
227G82
09/08/89
1,129.94
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
227G82
09/08/89
5,268.68
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
227682
09/08/89
3,182.67
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
227G82
09/08/89
633.28
GRIGGS COOPER
5074626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
227G82
09/08/89
3,465.92
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
227G82
09/06/89
95.01
GRIGGS COOPER MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
MANUAL
13,501..89
* * ** **
* ** -CKS
227J62
09/08/89
11.30-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
08 -31 -89 PAGE 8
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
227J62
09/08/89
.35-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
227J62
09/08/89
45.79-
JOHNSON WINE
50 =3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
227J62
09/08/89
.17-
JOHNSON WINE
50-3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
227J62
09/08/89
1.71-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
227J62
09/08/89
13.00-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
227J62
09/08/89
13.26-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
227J62
09/08/89
.. 70-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
227J62
09/08/89
2,289.74
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
227J62
09/08/89
14:00
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
227J62
09/08/89
5.68-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
227J62
09/08/89
34.60
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
227J62
09/08/89
.80
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
227J62
09/08/89
12.80
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
227J62
09/08/89
1,126.32
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
227J62
09/08/89
.40
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
227J62
09/08/89
17.30
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
227J62
09/08/89
2.40
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
227J62
09/08/89
20.40
JOHNSON WINE
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
227J62
09/08/89
1,299.92
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
227J62
09/08/89
171.14
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
227J62
09/08/89
1,323.05
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
227J62
09/08/89
69.20
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
227J62
09/08/89
19.60
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
227J62
09/08/89
5.36-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
227J62
09/08/89
1.60
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
6,305.95
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
227P82
09/08/89
1.38-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
227P82
09/08/89
8.79-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
227P82
09/08/89
2.82-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
227P82
09/08/89
3.55-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 842-84
MANUAL
227P82
09/08/89
.98-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
227P82
09/08/89
3.56-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
227P82
09/08/89
7.17-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
227P82
09/06/89
19.95
PRIOR WINE WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
227P82
09/08/89
48.95
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
227P82
09/08/89
439.48
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
227P82
09/08/89
141.20
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
227P82
09/08/89
- 177.28
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
227P82
09/08/89
48.84
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
227P82
09/08/89
178.08
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
227P82
09/08/89
358.48
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
1,384.01
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
227Q16
09/08/89
19.38-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
227Q16
09/08/89
7.40-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
227Q16
09/08/89
.51-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
227Q16
09/08/89
6.45-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
227Q16
09/08/89
.36-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
227Q16
09/08/89
6.33-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
227Q16
09/08/89
.72-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL-
* * * * **
227T49
09/08/89
316.25
TOW DISTRIBUTING
50- 3710 - 862 -86
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
100.40
TOW DISTRIBUTING
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
227Q16
09/08/89
1.21-
QUALITY
WINE
227Q16
09/08/89
29.65-
QUALITY
WINE
227Q16
09/08/89
.90-
QUALITY
WINE
227Q16
09/08/89
6.89-
QUALITY
WINE
227Q16
09/08/89
10.17-
QUALITY
WINE
227Q16
09/08/89
.71-
QUALITY
WINE
227Q16
09/08/89
2.85-
QUALITY
WINE
227Q16
09/08/89
1.80-
QUALITY
WINE
227Q16
09/08/89
11.42-
QUALITY
WINE
227Q16
09/08/89
142.89-
QUALITY
WINE
227Q16
09/08/89
969.09
QUALITY
WINE
227Q16
09/08/89
1,483.02
QUALITY
WINE
227Q16
09/08/89
508.40
QUALITY
WINE
227Q16
09/08/89
7,144.18
QUALITY
WINE
227Q16
09/08/89
35.90
QUALITY
WINE
227Q16
09/08/89
644.10
QUALITY
WINE
227Q16
09/08/89
51.75
QUALITY
WINE
227Q16
09/08/89
738.45
QUALITY
WINE
227Q16
09/08/89
120.75
QUALITY
WINE
227Q16
09/08/89
629.15
QUALITY
WINE
227Q16
09/08/89
71.80
QUALITY
WINE
227Q16
09/08/89
179.50
QUALITY
WINE
227Q16
09/08/89
89.75
QUALITY
WINE
227Q16
09/08/89
684.75
QUALITY
WINE
227Q16
09/08/89
71.10
QUALITY
WINE
227Q16
09/08/89
283.05
QUALITY
WINE
227Q16
09/08/89
1,138.25
QUALITY
WINE
14,593.35
* * * * **
227505
09/08/89
66.00
SALUD AMERICA
66.00
* * * * **
227T49
09/08/89
316.25
TOW DISTRIBUTING
50- 3710 - 862 -86
227T49
09/08/89
100.40
TOW DISTRIBUTING
MANUAL
227T49
09/08/89
130.85
TOW DISTRIBUTING
50- 3710 - 862 -86
227T49
09/06/89
33.00
TOW DIST
BEER
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
580.50 *
MANUAL
50- 4626 - 862 -86
* * * * **
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
228700
09/06/89
65.00
CRAGUNS CONF CTR
SCHOOL
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
65.00 *
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
228701
09/06/89
20.00
HENN TECH COLLEGE
SCHOOL
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
20.00 *
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
228702
09/06/89
230.00
K EIDEM
CONVENTION
* ** -CKS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
230.00 *
* ** -CKS
* * * * **
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
228N16
09/06/89
105.38
NSP
POWER
v
08 -31 -89 PAGE 9
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84 _
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4630 - 822 -82
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4202 - 420 -42 MANUAL
10- 4202 - 420 -42 MANUAL
10- 4202 - 420 -42 MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4252 - 330 -30 MANUAL
08 -31 -89 PAGE 10
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4252- 646 -64
rr/
27- 4252-662 -66
MANUAL
27- 4252 - 664 -66
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
MANUAL
CHECK REGISTER
MANUAL
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
228N16
09/06/89
2,419.01
NSP
POWER
228N16
09/06/89
3,656.58
NSP
POWER
228N16
09/06/89
256.02
NSP
POWER
228N16
09/06/89
675.58
NSP
POWER
228N16
09/06/89
5,861.86
NSP
POWER
228N16
09/06/89
201.69
NSP
POWER
228N16
09/06/89
165.37
NSP
POWER
10- 4156 - 510 -51
MANUAL
13,341.49
* ** -CKS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
* * * * **
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
228P70
09/06/89
160.00
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE
MANUAL
160.00 *
229C33
09/06/89
73,000.00-
CITY /EDINA
PAYROLL TRANSFER
229C33
09-/06/89
73,000.00
CITY /EDINA
PAYROLL TRANSFER
"
*
.00 *
* * * **
233673
09/05/89
423.87
GC PETTY CASH
SALARIES
233673
09/05/89
118.02
GC PETTY CASH
SALARIES
233673
09/05/89
41.77
GC PETTY CASH
OFFICE SUPPLIES.
233B73
09/05/89
32.38
GC PETTY CASH
TREES
233B73
09/05/89
2.97
GC PETTY CASH
LUMBER
233B73
09/05/89
22.37
GC PETTY CASH
CONCESSIONS
641.38
* * * * **
233F14
09/06/89
14,719.23
FIDELITY BANK
FICA
233F14
09/06/89
974.30
FIDELITY BANK
MEDICARE
15,693.53
* * * * **
233G86
09/06/89
11,570.95
GROUP HEALTH
INSURANCE
11,570.95
* * * * **
233P42
09/06/89
18,784.00
PHP
INSURANCE
18,784.00
* * * * **
234742
09/08/.89
1.87-
BRW ENTERPRISES
234742
09/08/89
2.35-
BRW ENTERPRISES
234742
09/08/89
.72-
BRW ENTERPRISES
234742
09/08/89
124.60
BRW ENTERPRISES
234742
09/08/89
157.20
BRW ENTERPRISES
234742
09/08/89
48.00
BRW ENTERPRISES
324.86
08 -31 -89 PAGE 10
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4252- 646 -64
MANUAL
27- 4252-662 -66
MANUAL
27- 4252 - 664 -66
MANUAL
27- 4252 - 667 -66
MANUAL
28- 4252 - 702 -70
MANUAL
29- 4252 - 722 -72
MANUAL
40- 4252 - 801 -80
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4290 - 510 -51
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50- 1010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
50- 1010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
27- 4120 - 663 -66
MANUAL
27- 4120 - 666 -66
MANUAL
27- 4516 - 661 -66
MANUAL
27- 4560 - 664 -66
MANUAL
27- 4604 - 662 -66
MANUAL
27- 4624 - 66,3 -66
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4149 - 510 -51
MANUAL
10- 4162 - 510 -51
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4156 - 510 -51
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4156 - 510 -51
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50=4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK
REGISTER
08 -31 -89 PAGE 11
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
234EII
09/08/89
12.17-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234EII
09/08/89
11.46-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234EII
09/08/89
8.03-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234E11
09/08/89
1.94-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234E11
09/08/89
608.73
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234E11
09/08/89
573.06
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234EII
09/08/89
97.06
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234EII
09/08/89
401.64
EAGLE WINE
50- 46.28- 862 -86
MANUAL
1,646.89
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
234E26
09/08/89
3.75-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234E26
09/08/89
2.86-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234E26
09/08/89
.25-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234E26
09/08/89
1.38-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822- -82
MANUAL
234E26
09/08/89
5.58-
ED PHILLIPS
.50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234E26
09/08/89
11.92 — ii.2s
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
234E26
09/08/89
6.36-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
234E26
09/08/89
16.32-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234E26
09/08/89
8.26-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234E26
09/08/89
36.41-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234E26
09/08/89
.51-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234E26
09/08/89
1.73-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234E26
09/08/89
8.81-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234E26
09/08/89
5.50-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234E26
09/08/89
41.39-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234E26
09/08/89
.68-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234E26
09/08/89
5.27-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234E26
09/08/89
69.39
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234E26
09/08/89
143.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234E26
09/08/89
413.18
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234E26
09/08/89
815.76
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234E26
09/08/89
1,820.70
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234E26
09/08/89
2,069.88
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234E26
09/08/89
25.95
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234E26
09/08/89
375.63
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234E26
09/08/89
557.72
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234E26
09/08/89
56.56-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234E26
09/08/89
51.90
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234E26
09/08/89
635.61
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234E26
09/08/89
1,192.14
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234E26
09/08/89
68.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234E26
09/08/89
173.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234E26
09/08/89
275.03
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234E26
09/08/89
881.96
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234E26
09/08/89
527.73
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
9,883.04*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
234G82
09/08/89
1.96-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 822 -82
MANUAL
�L)
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
08 -31 -89 PAGE 12
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
234G82
09/08/89
62.38-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234G82
09/08/89
55.15-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234G82
09/08/89
159.59-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234G82
09/08/89
84.52-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234G82
09/08/89
87.89-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234G82
09/08/89
16.29-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234G82
09/08/89
142.54-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234G82
09/08/89
4,226.11
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234G82
09/08/89
814.57
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234G82
09/08/89
4,394.59
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234G82
09/08/89
7,126.96
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234G82
09/08/89
.00
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234G82
09/08/89
.00
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234G82
09/08/89
4.99-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234G82
09/08/89
.00
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234G82
09/08/89
.00
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
15,946.92 * .
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
234J62
09/08/89
87.27-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234J62
09/08/89
5.41-
JOHNSON WINE
ipi NE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
59 ;;ig 822 82
MANUAL
MANYA6
234j62
234J62
99"98"89
09/08/89
87.27
1.00-
JEN Sep; Wi
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234J62
09/08/89
1.04-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234J62
09/08/89
25.54-
JOHNSON WINE
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
234J62
09/08/89
81.97-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234J62
09/08/89
80.36-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234J62
09/08/89
13.52-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234J62
09/08/89
4,363.58
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234J62
09/08/89
19.40
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234J62
09/08/89
20.80
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234J62
09/08/89
4,098.60
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234J62
09/08/89
1.32-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234J62
09/08/89
20.00
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234J62
09/08/89
4,017.83
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234J62
09/08/89
5.20
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234J62
09/08/89
539.32
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234J62
09/08/89
2.00
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234J62
09/08/89
2,551.55
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
234J62
09/08/89
99.50
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234J62
09/08/89
31.20
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234J62
•09/08/89
2.40
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234J62
09/08/89
103.80
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234J62
09/08/89
18.00
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234J62
09/08/89
1,351.13
2 242 S9 _*
JOHNSON WINE
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
* * * * **
16,946.88*
* ** -CKS
234P20 09/08/89 84.95 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL
234P20 09/08/89 3.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL
234P20 09/08/89 5.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL
234P20 09/08/89 186.05 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL
.04
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK
REGISTER
08 -31 -89 PAGE 13
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
234P20
09/08/89
4.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234P20
09/08/89
186.70
PAUSTIS & SONS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234P20
09/06/89
25.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
MIX
50- 4632 - 862 -86
MANUAL
494.70
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
234P32
09/06/89
24,553.47
P.E.R.A.
PERA
10- 4145 - 510 -51
MANUAL
24,553.47
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
234P82
09/08/89
.46-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234P82
09/08/89
3.55-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234P82
09/08/89
3.94-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234P82
09/08/89
3.74-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234P82
09/08/89
3.10-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234P82
09/08/89
5.46-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234P82
09/08/89
23.09
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234P82
09/08/89
177.25
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234P82
09/08/89
196.85
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234P82
09/08/89
186.99
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234P82
09/08/89
272.93
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234P82
09/08/89
155.04
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234P82
09/06/89
41.11
PRIOR WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234P82
09/06/89
113.53
PRIOR WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
MANUAL
1,146.54
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
234Q16
09/08/89
2.38 -
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234Q16
09/08/89
.18-
QUALITY.WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234Q16
09/08/89
23.87-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82-
MANUAL
234Q16
09/08/89
.43-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234Q16
09/08/89
49.29-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822-82
MANUAL
234Q16
09/08/89
1.18 -
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234Q16
09/08/89
.35-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234Q16
09/08/89
8.30-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234Q16
09/08/89
8.54-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234Q16
09/08/89
1.74-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234Q16
09/08/89
.72-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234Q16
09/08/89
99.21-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234Q16
09/08/89
2.87-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234Q16
09/08/89
7.58-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234Q16
09/08/89
1.62-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234Q16
09/08/89
4.97-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234Q16
09/08/89
118.42-
QUALITY WINE
50- 37.10- 862 -86
MANUAL
234Q16
09/08/89
1,193.51
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234Q16
09/08/89
2,464.27
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234Q16
09/08/89
59.08
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234Q16
09/08/89
414.70
QUALITY WINE•
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234Q16
09/08/89
4,960.94
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234Q16
09/08/89
248.31
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234Q16
09/08/89
5,921.07
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234Q16
09/08/89
34.50
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
�WO '!L
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
* ** -CKS
08 -31 -89 PAGE 14
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
234Q16
09/08/89
17.95
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234Q16
09/08/89
42.95
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234Q16
09/08/89
238.85
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
234Q16
09/08/89
71.80
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234Q16
09/08/89
850.45
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234Q16
09/08/89
173.60
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
234Q16
09/08/89
161.55
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234Q16
09/08/89
754.20
QUALITY'WINE
241E11
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
234Q16
09/08/89
285.90
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4632 - 842 -84
MANUAL
17,561.98
2,332.81
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
237760
09/06/89
130.00
MN APCO
OFFICE TRAINING
10- 4202 - 420 -42
MANUAL
09/08/89
2.82-
130.00 *
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
241E26
09/08/89
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
241C47 09/06/89 432.00 COMM LIFE INS INSURANCE 10- 4157 - 510 -51 MANUAL
432.00 * -
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
241E11
09/08/89
5.58-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
241EII
09/08/89
3.18-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
241E11
09/08/89
8.70-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241EII
09/08/89
1.59-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
241EII
09/08/89
26.40-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
241E11
09/08/89
159.18
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
241E11
09/08/89
279.15
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
241EII
09/08/89
435.23
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241EII
09/08/89
79.59
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
241EII
09/08/89
1,320.16
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
241E11
09/06/89
24.94
EAGLE WINE MIX
50- 4632 - 822 -82
MANUAL
241E11
09/06/89
80.01
EAGLE WINE MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
MANUAL
2,332.81
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
241E26
09/08/89
19.37-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
241E26
09/08/89
2.82-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
241E26
09/08/89
1.28-
ED. PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL,
241E26
09/08/89
3.06-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
241E26
09/08/89
3.96 - 4.96
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241E26
09/08/89
.68-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241E26
09/08/89
2.55-
ED PHILLIPS
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
241E26
09/08/89
16.69-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241E26
09/08/89
2.26-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241E26
09/08/89
2.87-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241E26
09/08/89
.18-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241E26
09/08/89
4.96-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241E26
09/08/89
12.02-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
241E26
09/08/89
2.26-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
241E26
09/08/89
8.12-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
241E26
09/08/89
6.30-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
241G82 -
09/08/89
74.417
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3700 - 822 -82
MANUAL
241G82
09/08/89
68.307
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3700 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241G82
09/08/89
157.77-!
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
MANUAL
241G82
09/08/89
CHECK REGISTER
GRIGGS
08 -31 -89
PAGE 15
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
86.85=
GRIGGS
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. #
MESSAGE
241E26•
09/08/89
GRIGGS
.681,-
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
09/08/89
MANUAL
241E26
09/08/89
12.071-
MANUAL
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
GRIGGS
MANUAL
241E26
09/08/89
968.62
09/08/89
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 822 -82
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
241E26
09/08/89
64.20
GRIGGS
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 822 -82
241G82
MANUAL
241E26
09/08/89
834.91'
50- 4628 - 842 -84
ED
PHILLIPS
50 -4626- 842 -84
46.24
MANUAL
241E26
09/08/89
143.71'
241G82
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 842 -84
COOPER
MANUAL
241E26
09/08/89
406.37;
.00'
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
MANUAL
241E26
09/08/89
315.00,
COOPER
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 862 -86
09/08/89
MANUAL
241E26
09/08/89
282.49
MANUAL
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
241E26
09/08/89
306.85
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
241E26
09/08/89
1 18.20,
JOHNSON
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
241J62
MANUAL
241E26
09/08/89
396.90
50- 3710 - 822 -82
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
.69;
MANUAL
241E26
09/08/89
255.60,
241J62
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
WINE
MANUAL
241E26
09/08/89
68.68
12.16 -1
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
MANUAL
241E26
09/.08/89
464.09
WINE
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
09/08/89
MANUAL
241E26
09/08/89
226.80'
MANUAL
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
JOHNSON
MANUAL
241E26
09/08/89
1,202.08
09/08/89
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241E26
09/08/89
1,207.25',
JOHNSON
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
241E26
09/08/89
226.80'
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
241E26
09/08/89
68.68;
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
241E26
09/06/89
32.061
� eon
nc
ED
PHILLIPS MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
MANUAL
kkkkkk
73,307..16 *`
kk* -CKS
241G82 -
09/08/89
74.417
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3700 - 822 -82
MANUAL
241G82
09/08/89
68.307
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3700 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241G82
09/08/89
157.77-!
COOPER
50- 3700 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241G82
09/08/89
34.787
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
241G82
09/08/89
86.85=
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241G82
09/08/89
105.84-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
241G82
09/08/89
1,739.22',
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
241G82
09/08/89
4,342.40
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241G82
09/08/89
5,291.991
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
241G82
09/08/89
1 .00�
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
241G82
09/08/89
82.50-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241G82
09/08/89
46.24
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241G82
09/08/89
.00, !
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241G82
09/08/89
.00'
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241G82
09/08/89
46.2.47
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241G82
09/08/89
46.24=
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
10,716.921*
k* k k k k
* ** -CKS
241J62
09/08/89
45.98
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3700 - 822 -82
MANUAL
241J62
09/08/89
53.62;
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
241J62
09/08/89
.69;
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
241J62
09/08/89
2.21 =.
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
241J62
09/08/89
12.16 -1
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
241J62
09/08/89
15.321
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241J62
09/08/89
4.42;
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241J62
09/08/89
72.42 .
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241J62
09/08/89
.87 -1
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241J62
09/08/89
4.42;
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
to to
08 -31 -89 PAGE 16
# P.O. #, MESSAGE
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK
REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV
241J62
09/08/89
18.72-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
241J62
09/08/89
50.17-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
241J62
09/08/89
1.04-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
241J62
09/08/89
13.20
JOHNSON'WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
241J62
09/08/89
2,682.23
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
241J62
09/08/89
110.45
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
241J62
09/08/89
.80
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
241J62
09/08/89
220.90
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
241J62
09/08/89
.3,621.28
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
241J62
09/08/89
16.80
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
241J62
09/08/89
1.60
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
241J62
09/08/89
8.40
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
241J62
09/08/89
1.60
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
241J62
09/08/89
2,509.28
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
241J62
09/08/89
220.90
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
241J62
09/08/89
69.20
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
241J62
09/08/89
20.40
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
241J62
09/08/89
.00
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
241J62
09/08/89
1,213.17
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
241J62
09/08/89
1.60
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
241J62
09/08/89
2.00
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
241J62
09/08/89
3.30-
JOHNSON WINE
50'- 4628 - 842 -84
241J62
09/08/89
7.67-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
241J62
09/08/89
26.80
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
241J62
09/08/89
86.50
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
241J62
09/08/89
1,531.20
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
241J62
09/08/89
29.60
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
241J62
09/08/89
1,866.84
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
241J62
09/08/89
2.40
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
241J62
09/08/89
103.80
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
14,067.94
* * * * **
241N12
09/06/89
2,392.19
MUTUAL BENEFIT
LIFE INSURANCE
10- 4158 - 510 -51
2,392.19
241P82
09/08/89
2.47-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
241P82
09/08/89
3.01-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
241P82
09/08/89
4.16-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
241P82
09/08/89
1.90-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
241P82
09/08/89
6.26-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
241P82
09/08/89
4.71-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
241P82
09/08/89
150.67
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
241P82
09/08/89
103.74
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
241P82
09/06/89
19.95
PRIOR WINE
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
241P82
09/08/89
95.02
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
241P82
09/08/89
207.77
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
241P82
09/08/89
313.07
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
241P82
09/08/89
235.57
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
1,103.28
08 -31 -89 PAGE 16
# P.O. #, MESSAGE
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
08 -31 -89 PAGE 17
.CHECK N0.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
241Q16
09/08/89
.85.
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
241Q16
09/08/89
7.14-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
241Q16
09/08/89
.18
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
241Q16
09/08/89
1.18-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
241Q16
09/08/89
.18-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
241Q16
09/08/89
.18-
QUALITY WINE
50 -3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
241Q16
09/08/89
29.57-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
241Q16
09/08/89
77.43-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241Q16
09/08/89
15.01-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241Q16
09/08/89
1.80-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241Q16
09/08/89
1.80
QUALITY WINE
5073710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241Q16
09/08/89
1.80-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241Q16
09/08/89
48.54-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
241Q16
09/08/89
1.31-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
241Q16
09/08/89
.72-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
241Q16
09/08/89
9.07-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
241Q16
09/08/89
1,478.66
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
241Q16
09/08/89
3,871.57
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241Q16
09/08/89
2,427.56
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
241Q16
09/08/89
117.60
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
241Q16
09/08/89
712.15
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
241Q16
09/08/89
84.95-
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
241Q16
09/08/89
17.95
-.
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
241Q16
09/08/89
17.95
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
241Q16
09/08/89
17.95
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
241Q16
09/08/89
179.50
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241Q16
09/08/89
1,498.85
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241Q16
09/08/89
179.50
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241Q16
09/08/89
179.50
-.
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241Q16
09/08/89
902.90
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
241Q16
09/08/89
130.15
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
241Q16
09/08/89
71.80
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
241Q16
09/06/89
30.44
QUALITY WINE MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
MANUAL
11,163.08
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
241T49
09/08/89
37.95
TOW DISTRIBUTING
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
241T49
09/08/89
100.24
TOW DISTRIBUTING
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
241T49
09/08/89
90.75
TOW DISTRIBUTING
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
228.94
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
248E11
09/08/89
10.83-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
248EII
09/08/89
1.59-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
248EII
09/08/89
12.14-
EAGLE WINE
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
248EII
09/08/89
1.59-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
248EII
09/08/89
79.59
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
248EII
09/08/89
541.70
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
248EII
09/08/89
607.10
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
248E11
09/08/89
79.59
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
1,281.83
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
Nmol
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
08 -31 -89 PAGE 18
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
248E17
09/08/89
25.00
EASTSIDE BEV
50= 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
25.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
248E26
09/08/89
3.82-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
248E26
09/08/89
2.15-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
248E26
09/08/89
3.96-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
248E26
09/08/89.
6.17-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
248E26
09/08/89
13.95-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
248E26
09/08/89
12.06-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
248E26
09/08/89
4.31-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
248E26
09/08/89
9.35-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
248E26
09/08/89
7.07-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
248E26
09/08/89
47.37-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
248E26
09/08/89
9.71-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
248E26
09/08/89
308.57
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
248E26
09/08/89
603.01
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
248E26
09/08/89
215.91
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
248E26
09/08/89
2,368.74
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
248E26
09/08/89
396.38
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
248E26
09/08/89
215.20
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
248E26
09/08/89
382.70
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
248E26
09/08/89
935.89
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
248E26
09/08/89
1,395.21
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
248E26
09/08/89
971.29
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
248E26
09/08/89
707.57
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
248E26
09/08/89
56.56-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
8,323.99
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
248G82
09/08/89
31.40-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 822 -82
MANUAL
248G82
09/08/89
98.54-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 842 -84
MANUAL
248G82
09/08/89
72.24-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 862 -86
MANUAL
248G82
09/08/89
36.46-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
248G82
09/08/89
41.13-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
248G82
09/08/89
117.74-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
248G82
09/08/89
1,822.97
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
248G82
09/08/89
2,056.67
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
248G82
09/08/89
5,887.17
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
248G82
09/08/89
12.52-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
248G82
09/08/89
.00
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
248G82
09/08/89
.00
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
248G82
09/08/89
.00
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
9,356.78
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
248J62
09/08/89
15.19-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
248J62
09/08/89
19.16-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
248J62
09/08/89
2.22-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
248J62
09/08/89
60.54-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
248J62
09/08/89
28.08-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
'�`' .. - ,'-YZ- �+.wn�,s•+�w �+e.°fils "rM!'Yw'� f 13/.x° -�� z��. °' �? . !' �"�- .. � ^ �. ~ --
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
08 -31 -89 PAGE 19
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
248J62
09/08/89
17.06-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
248J62
09/08/89
91.87-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
248J62
09/08/89
957.60
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
248J62
09/08/89
4.20
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
248J62
09/08/89
14.00
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
248J62
09/08/89
3,026.57
JOHNSON WINE
50 -4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
248J62
09/08/89
4,594.20
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
248J62
09/08/89
22.40
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
248J62
09/08/89
14.00
JOHNSON WINE
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
248J62
09/08/89
1,517.52
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
248J62
09/08/89
2,805.45
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
248J62
09/08/89
45.60
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
248J62
09/08/89
2.00
JOHNSON WINE
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
248J62
09/08/89
222.83
JOHNSON WINE
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
248J62
09/08/89
26.80
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
248J62
09/08/89
1,704.87
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
14,723.92
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
248P20
09/08/89
115.75
PAUSTIS & SONS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
248P20
09/08/89
4.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
119.75
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
248P82
09/08/89
2.43-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
248P82
09/08/89
3.11-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
248P82
09/08/89
8.80-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
248P82
09/08/89
5.50 -
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
248P82
09/08/89
8.90-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
248P82
09/08/89
1.46-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
248P82
09/08/89
155.59
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
248P82
09/08/89
121.67
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
248P82
09/08/89
275.19
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
248P82
09/08/89
439.88
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
248P82
09/08/89
444.80
PRIOR WINE
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
248P82
09/08/89
72.94
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
1,479.87
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
248Q16
09/08/89
7.73-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
248Q16
09/08/89
.54-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
- MANUAL
248Q16
09/08/89
21.49-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
248Q16
09/08/89
4.11-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
248Q16
09/08/89
.90-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
248Q16
09/08/89
43.17-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
248Q16
09/08/89
3.55-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
248Q16
09/08/89
6.98-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
248Q16
09/08/89
51.54-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
248Q16
09/08/89
1.70-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
248Q16
09/08/89
3.77 -.
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
248Q16
09/08/89
1.26-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
248Q16
09/08/89
10.52-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
�.
1989 CITY
OF EDINA.
CHECK REGISTER
08 -31 -89
PAGE 20
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. #
MESSAGE
248Q16
09/08/89
1,075.39
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
248Q16
09/08/89
2,158.38
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
248Q16
09/08/89
2,576.09
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
248Q16
09/08/89
769.20
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
248Q16
09/08/89
53.85
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
248Q16
09/08/89
411.25
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
248Q16
09/08/89
89.75
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
248Q16
09/08/89
694.55
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
248Q16
09/08/89
352.85
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
248Q16
09/08/89
1,048.55
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
_MANUAL
248Q16
09/08/89
377.46
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
248Q16
09/08/89
125.65
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
248Q16
09/08/89
169.20
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
9,744.91
* * * * **
* * * -.CKS
162,488.57
FUND
10 TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
23.38
FUND
12 TOTAL
COMMUNICATIONS
1,054.49
FUND
23 TOTAL
ART CENTER
12,523.23
FUND
26 TOTAL
SWIMMING POOL FUND
27,430.61
FUND
27 TOTAL
GOLF COURSE FUND
6,278.95
FUND
28 TOTAL
RECREATION CENTER FUND
429.33
FUND
29 TOTAL
GUN RANGE FUND
10,260.45
FUND
30 TOTAL
EDINBOROUGH PARK
43,419.60
FUND
40.TOTAL
UTILITY FUND
306,554.19
810,859.4'
FUND
50 TOTAL
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
570,462.80*
5'4. "0.00
TOTAL