Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-10-02_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 2, 1989 7:00 P.H. ROLLCALL I. APPROVAL OF HRA MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 18, 1989 II. PROPOSED PROPERTY ACQUISITION - KUNZ OIL COMPANY AND LEWIS ENGINEERING COMPANY III•. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Council member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of September 18 and Special Meetings of May 8, July 6 and August 21, 1989 III. PUBLIC HEARING - PROPERTY TAX INCREASE - 1990 BUDGET IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall.vote required 'to pass. * A. Amendments to Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances [Continue to 10/16/89] * B. Amendment to Final Development Plan, Edinborouah - Hawthorn Edina, Inc. Generally located north and east of Edinborough Way and west of York Av [Continue to 10/16/89] * C. Amendment to Ordinance No. 825 - To Add a Hotel as a Permitted Use in the MMD -5 District [Continue to 10/16/89] * D. Lot Division - Leo Evans Property,- Generally located south of VErnon Av and east of Olinger Road [Not subject to moratorium on Single Family Subdivisions] E. Appeal of Board of Appeals Decision - Sally Lee, 5600 Wooddale -,30 foot Lot Width Variance for 5616 Wooddale Av F. Amendment to Sign Ordinance No. 451 - To Add Requirements for MDD -6 District - Centennial Lakes * G. Set Hearing Date - Zoning Ordinance Amendment to Allow Private Clubs in the PC -1 Commercial District [10/16/89] V. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS VI. AWARD OF BIDS * A. Storm Sewer Improvement Nos. STS -195, STS -196, STS -199 and STS -200 [Continue to 10/16/891 * B. Van Valkenburg Park Lighting, Scoreboards & P.A. System [Reject Bids] C. Art Center Expansion VII. PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED ISSUANCE BY THE CITY OF EDINA. MINNESOTA OF GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS A. Resolution Relating to General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1989; Authorizing Issuance and Providing for Public Sale Thereof Agenda Edina City Council October 2, 1989 Page Two VIII. .PUBLIC HEARING - ON -SALE WINE LICENSE FEES IX. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Fees and Charges B. Approval of 1990 -91 Community Health Services Plan Update C. Appointment - Community Development and Planning Commission X. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS A. Petition for Vacation of Old County Road Right of Way - Leo Evans Property Generally located east of Vernon Av and east of Olinger Rd - Set Hearing Date [11/06/89] B. Letter - White Oaks Improvement Association C. Letter - U.S. Conference of Mayors - Charleston Hurricane Disaster XI. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES XII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL A. Property Owner Notification of Complaints on Rental Property XIII. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS XIV. FINANCE A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 10/02/89: General Fund $128,356.06, C.D.B.G. $3,318.41, Communications $3,944.68, Art Center $5,615.00, Swimming Pool Fund $162.95, Golf Course Fund $13,859.13, Recreation Center Fund $1,577.24, Gun Range Fund $2,186.18, Edinborough Park $10,616.01, Utility Fund $250,316.84; Storm Sewer Utility $182.62, Liquor Dispensary Fund $11,311.14, Construction Fund $15,631.90, Total $447,078.16 3 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Mon Oct 16 Council /Board of Appeals 6:00 p.m. Mgrs Conf Room Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Mon Nov 6 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Fri Nov 10 VETERANS DAY - City Hall Closed Mon Nov 20 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Thurs Nov 23) ) THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY - City Hall Closed Fri Nov 24) MINUTES EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVEIAPMENT AUTHORITY SEPTEMBER 18, 1989 Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Paulus, Rice and Smith. Commissioner Kelly chaired the meeting in the absence of Chairman Richards. MINUTES of the BRA Meeting of August 21, 1989 and the Joint HRA /Council Meeting of September 5, 1989 were approved as submitted by motion of Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Rice. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly Motion carried. UPDATE GIVEN ON 50TH & FRANCE IMPROVEMENTS: DECISION ON TM REPIACEMENT CONTINUED TO 10/16/89 Engineer Fran Hoffman reported on the survey of property owners /tennants conducted after installation of test sections of different types of material for the the replacement project at the 50th and France Business District. Slides were shown of the nine test sections which had been placed in the sidewalk behind the Edina Theatre and also of existing tile pads. He said that out of 160 survey forms mailed, only 40 were returned. He noted that the 50th & France Business Association Board Members have some of the same differences of opinion as demonstrated in the survey and comments section. There continues to be an underlying concern that any and all decorative products will not hold up as long as plain concrete or exposed aggregate concrete. Staff agreed with the Board's opinion that the original paver installation did not provide the long term stability that the City had hoped for. He stated that a comparative evaluation of the paving alternatives was provided by BRW who commented on each alternative. Engineer Hoffman stated that staff would recommend the following solution which would deal with all issues of concern: A) Concrete brick with beveled edges. (Identified as Test Section #1) B) Brick placed on concrete base with sand between concrete and brick. C) Use of "rebars" (tie -in steel bars to existing concrete to prevent differential settling) D) "Shot - blast" existing plain concrete to enhance its appearance after paver brick installation. He proposed that bids for the work be taken this fall for construction to begin next spring. Gail Korst, President of the 50th and France Business /Professional Association, commented that, according to the .survey results, there are mixed reactions to the alternatives for tile replacement. She said that the members of the Association are not ready to make a decision and would like to consider additional alternatives and get more answers from the City staff. The main concern is to put in something that will last for a longer period of time. However, the Association members would like to have this decided this fall so that work could begin in early spring of 1990.. Engineer Hoffman said that there are several additional alternatives that could be considered, and suggested that the bomanite alternatives be eliminated because of potential problems as to durability and maintenance. Some have suggested using ordinary concrete because they are worried that any type of decorative system will not be easy to walk on. He said that when the area was renovated in 1976 a design scenario was set up that everyone bought into and that plain concrete would defeat that plan. Commissioner Paulus commented that a concensus probably cannot be reached by the 50th and France merchants and that we should follow the professional opinion of the consultant. She said she would like to see a decision made within four weeks so that this would be resolved and the project could proceed. Commissioner Smith said he agreed with the comments of Member Paulus, that an inordinate amount of time has been spent on this project and that a decision needs to be made. Further, he said he objected to having a consultant tell us what kind of sidewalk to lay down in Minnesota. He added that the issue really is do they want the brick pavers or concrete which would eliminate the maintenance problems. Commissioner Rice commented that, because the sidewalks are for pedestrian traffic, safety for walkers should be considered. He said he was surprised by the number of survey comments that the pavers were a problem for women wearing heels. He said he would support looking at this further to get more input from the merchants as he saw no immediate urgency for the project. Commissioner Paulus made a motion directing staff to continue to work with the 50th and France merchants and to come back with a consensus within four. weeks for action by the Council. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Smith. Ayes: Paulus, Smith, Kelly Nays: Rice Motion carried. There being no further business on'the HRA Agenda, motion of Commissioner Paulus was seconded by Commissioner Smith for adjournment. Motion carried. Executive Director o e �, ch \N�bRPORl�Z�O�� 1888 To: HRA From: Gordon Hughes REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Date: September 29, 1989 Subject: ACQUISITION OF LEWIS ENGINEERING AND KUNZ OIL PROPERTY - GRANDVIEW REDEVELOPMENT AREA Recommendation: Agenda Item # HRA II. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends [�] To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance 0 Discussion Adopt the attached resolution and direct staff to pursue a redevelopment agreement with Jerry's Enterprises /Opus. Info /Background: Approximately 18 months ago, staff and the Community Development and Planning Commission reviewed plans for an office /retail development of the subject pro- perties. The proposed development also included the school bus garage'property owned by the School District. The development was proposed by Jerry's Enter - prises. Following Planning Commission review, Jerry's Enterprises' options for the subject properties expired and, for a variety of reasons, were not renewed. During the past several months, staff has discussed redevelopment alternatives for the properties with the property owners.as well as several developers. One of the prospective developers is again Jerry's Enterprises who is working with Opus Corporation to pursue development of the property. Based upon our discussions with Jerry's /Opus and the property owners, it is apparent that financial assistance will be requested from the HRA. Part of this assistance could be in the form of a land write -down. As such, the property owners have requested that the HRA initiate the land acquisition /redevelopment -2- process through the adoption of resolutions authorizing HRA acquisition of the property by eminent domain if necessary. Based on our advice, the property owners have stated this request in the attached letters. Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan The Council and HRA adopted the Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan and created the Tax Increment Financing District in 1984. (copy enclosed). This Plan was preceded by the Grandview Area Traffic Study which was incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan. Since adoption, several elements of the public portion of the Plan have been or are being completed: Link Road reconstruction and signalization Closure of Vernon /Eden /Sherwood intersection Consolidate Jerry's /Norwest Bank /Union Oil access - Vacate Summit Avenue Demolish Public Works garage and reconstruct public parking ramp /Public Works facility In addition, several private developments envisioned by the Plan have occurred: - Jerry's shopping center and office expansion - Vernon Terrace Apartments - Summit Place Apartments The Redevelopment Plan identified the subject properties as characterized by "non- conforming uses, obsolete buildings and incompatible land uses." Among the goals promoted by the Redevelopment Plan was "to undertake land acquisition, parcel assembly and parcel disposition necessary to eliminate certain substandard and non - conforming uses and buildings, to assemble logical, conforming and more efficient building sites." The Plan also notes that public acquisition of property would be kept to a minimum, but in some cases, such as the subject properties, public acquisition may be necessary. In conjunction with the Redevelopment Plan approval, the Council also accepted a land use plan for the Grandview area. (copy attached). This land use plan illustrated medium density residential land uses for the Kunz Oil /Lewis Engineering properties, with the exception of the extreme southerly portion of the Lewis site which was designated for office /office- showroom uses. This plan did not illustrate a potential re -use of the school bus garage site. Proposed Resolution As noted earlier, the property owners have requested that the HRA initiate the redevelopment process through the adoption of a resolution authorizing acquisition by eminent domain if necessary. We have suggested that if such a resolution is adopted, it should be conditional upon the execution of a redevelopment agreement with a redeveloper. The attached draft resolution, which has been prepared for your consideration, contains such a condition. -3- Prospective Redeveloper As noted earlier, staff has met with several prospective redevelopers of the subject property. Such redevelopers have advocated redevelopments ranging from multi - family residential to office - retail to all:,retail with the latter being the most frequently proposed project. Based upon our discussions, staff believes that the office /retail concept advocated by Jerry's Enterprises /Opus represents the most viable alternative. We, therefore, suggest that the HRA authorize staff to negotiate with Jerry's /Opus to prepare a draft redevelopment agreement. The HRA should understand, however, that the proposed redeveloper is pursuing a redevelopment plan which does not conform to the land use plan adopted by the Council several years ago; i.e. multi - family housing. School Bus Garage An integral part of the proposed project is the redevelopment of the school bus garage site. This property has not been included in the proposed resolution at this time. Although the Board of Education has not formally considered this project, School District staff has again confirmed their interest in the concept and their willingness to consider relocation alternatives. Recommended Actions If the HRA wishes to proceed, staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution. We further suggest that the HRA formally direct staff to pursue a redevelopment agreement with Jerry's Enterprises /Opus. Future Actions The HRA /City Council would have to take several additional actions prior to actual acquisition and development of the property including: - Approval of a redevelopment agreement - Rezoning and plan approval of the proposed project - Public hearing to amend the Tax Increment Financing Plan - Public hearing to re -sell the properties if purchased by the HRA Alternatives The HRA could, or course, reject the resolution and involvement in the redevelopment project and suggest that any redevelopment be accomplished on a private basis. The HRA could reject the resolution but direct staff to negotiate with a prospective redeveloper. The resolution could be reconsidered later if a redevelopment contract were achieved. The HRA could adopt the resolution and then solicit Requests for Proposals for the development of the site. This process would allow for a formal comparison of development proposals. This is a relatively complicated process which may require a greater commitment to redevelop the site than the HRA wishes to offer at this point. �t } RESOLUTION WHEREAS, it is necessary, advisable, and in the public interest that the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, acquire for redevelopment purposes, and pursuant to the redevelopment plan entitled "Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan" dated May 30, 1984, adopted by the HRA on June 18, 1984, and approved by the City Council of the City of Edina on June 18, 1984, property within the Grandview redevelopment area; and WHEREAS, in order to accomplish the purposes set out in said Plan, it is necessary that the properties described on Exhibit A attached hereto and hereby made a part be redeveloped; and WHEREAS, the HRA has been advised that said property will not be made available for redevelopment unless it is acquired by eminent domain; and WHEREAS, by reason of the inability of any private party to purchase said property for redevelopment, it will be necessary to procure the same by the right of eminent domain. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the HRA proceed to procure the property described on Exhibit A hereto under its right of eminent domain if it is not made available for redevelopment by sale to a private party or parties; and that the attorneys for the HRA be instructed and directed to file the necessary petition therefor and to prosecute such action to a successful conclusion, or until it is abandoned, dismissed or terminated by the HRA or by the Court; and that the attorneys for the HRA, the Director and Executive Director of the HRA and the Chairman and Secretary of the HRA do all things necessary to be done in the commencement, prosecution and successful termination of such eminent domain proceeding. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that none of the foregoing actions to acquire the property described on Exhibit A hereto be started or undertaken until the HRA has signed and delivered a contract for redevelopment of said property, and the School District Property north of Eden Avenue; with a redeveloper, and on terms and conditions, acceptable to the HRA, and until the Tax Increment Financing Plan is amended in accordance with Minnesota Statute 469.175, subd.(4). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that none of the foregoing resolutions shall be effective or valid after December 31, 1989. EXHIBIT A Lot 1, Block 1, Wanner Addition, EXCEPT that part described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Lot 1; thence North along the East line of said Lot 1, a distance of 23.4 feet; thence West parallel with the South line of said Lot 1 a distance of 101 feet; thence South parallel with the East line of said Lot 1, a distance of 22.4 feet; thence West parallel with the South line of said Lot 1 to the West line of said Lot 1; thence South along the West line of said Lot 1 a distance of 1 foot to the Southwest corner of said Lot 1; thence East along the South line of said Lot 1 to the point of beginning. and Lot 1, Block 1, "Edenmoor, Hennepin County, Minnesota ", EXCEPT the South six (6) feet thereof. and That part of Government Lot 8, Section 28, Township 117 North, Range 21 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying Southerly of the South line of Eden Avenue, Westerly of the West right of way line of the Minneapolis Northfield and Southern Railway and Easterly of Block 1, Wanner Addition, EXCEPT that part described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of Lot 2, Block 1, Wanner Addition; thence North a distance of 25 feet; thence West a distance of 90 feet to the East line of Lot 1, Block 1, Wanner Addition; thence South a distance of 25 feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot 1; thence East a distance of 90 feet to the point of beginning. Also, Lot 2, Block 1, Wanner Addition, according to the map or plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for said Hennepin County, subject to an easement for roadway purposes over and across the South 25 feet of said Lot 2, and together with an easement for roadway purposes over and across the North 25 feet of Lot 3, Block 1 of said Wanner Addition; also together with an easement for road purposes over a strip of land 16 feet in width being 8 feet on each side of the following described line: Commencing at a point on the south line of Eden Prairie Road 358 feet due East from the West line of said Government Lot 8; thence South and parallel with the west line of said Government Lot 8 to a point which is 612.9 feet North of the South line of said Lot 8; thence west at right angles to east line of premises first above described. That part of Lot 1, Block 1 of said Wanner Addition described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Lot 1; thence North along the East line of said Lot 1, a distance of 23.4 feet; thence West parallel with the South line of said Lot 1 a distance of 101 feet; thence South parallel with the East line.of said Lot 1, a distance of 22.4 feet; thence West parallel with the South line of said Lot 1 to the West line of said Lot l; thence South along the West line of said Lot 1 a distance of 1 foot to the Southwest corner of said Lot 1; thence East along the South line of said Lot 1 to the point of beginning. That part of Government Lot 8, Section 28, Township 117 North, Range 21 West, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point located on a line drawn between the following described points; Point 1 located on a line parallel with and distant 221.8 feet East of the West line of said Government Lot 8, which point is distant South 259.4 feet from the Intersection of the center line of Eden Prairie Road and said line; and Point 2 located on the South line of said Government Lot 8, 246.8 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Government Lot 8; said point of beginning being 647.9 feet from the South line of said Government Lot 8; thence Northerly along said drawn line 25 feet; thence Easterly and at right angles a distance of 90 feet; thence Southerly and parallel with said drawn line 25 feet; thence Westerly and at right angles to point of beginning. ATTEST: Chairman Executive Director -2- RESOLUTION WHEREAS, it is necessary, advisable, and in the public interest that the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, acquire for redevelopment purposes, and pursuant to the redevelopment plan entitled "Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan" dated May 30, 1984„ adopted by the HRA on June 18, 1984, and approved by the City Council of the City of Edina on June 18, 1984, property within the Grandview redevelopment area; and WHEREAS, in order to accomplish the purposes set out in said Plan, it is necessary that the properties described on Exhibit A attached hereto and hereby made a part be redeveloped; and WHEREAS, the HRA has been advised that said property will not be made available for redevelopment unless it is acquired by eminent domain; and WHEREAS, by reason of the inability of any private party to purchase said property for redevelopment, it will be necessary to procure the same by the right of eminent domain. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the HRA proceed to procure the property described on Exhibit A hereto under its right of eminent domain if it is not made available for redevelopment by sale to a private party or parties; and that the attorneys for the HRA be instructed and directed to file the necessary petition therefor and to prosecute such action to a successful conclusion, or until it is abandoned, dismissed or terminated by the HRA or by the Court; and that the attorneys for the HRA, the Director and Executive Director of the HRA and the Chairman and Secretary of the HRA do all things necessary to be done in the commencement, prosecution and successful termination of such eminent domain proceeding. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that none of the foregoing actions to acquire the property described on Exhibit A hereto be started or undertaken until the HRA has signed and delivered a contract for redevelopment of said property, and the School District Property north of Eden Avenue, with a redeveloper, and on terms and conditions, acceptable to the HRA, and until the Tax Increment Financing Plan is amended in accordance with Minnesota Statute 469.175, subd.(4). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that none of the foregoing resolutions shall be effective or valid after December 31, 1989.. EXHIBIT A Lot 1, Block 1, Wanner Addition, EXCEPT that part described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Lot 1; thence North along the East line of said Lot 1, a distance of 23.4 feet; thence West parallel with the South line of said Lot 1 a distance of 101 feet; thence South parallel with the East line of said Lot 1, a distance of 22.4 feet; thence West parallel with the South line of said Lot 1 to the West line of said Lot 1; thence South along the West line of said Lot 1 a distance of l foot to the Southwest corner of said Lot 1; thence East along the South line of said Lot 1 to the point of beginning. and Lot 1, Block 1, "Edenmoor, Hennepin County, Minnesota ", EXCEPT the South six (6) feet thereof. and That part of Government Lot 8, Section 28, Township 117 North, Range 21 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying Southerly of the South line of Eden Avenue, Westerly of the West right of way line of the Minneapolis Northfield and Southern Railway and Easterly of Block 1, Wanner Addition, EXCEPT that part described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of Lot 2, Block 1, Wanner Addition; thence North a distance of 25 feet; thence West a distance of 90 feet to the East line of Lot 1, Block 1, Wanner Addition; thence South a distance of 25 feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot 1; thence East a distance of 90 feet to the point of beginning. Also, Lot 2, Block 1, Wanner Addition, according to the map or plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for said Hennepin County, subject to an easement for roadway purposes over and across the South 25 feet of said Lot 2, and together with an easement for roadway purposes over and across the North 25 feet of Lot 3, Block 1 of said Wanner Addition; also together with an easement for road purposes over a strip of land 16 feet in width being 8 feet on each side of the following described line: Commencing at a point on the south line of Eden Prairie Road 358 feet due East from the West line of said Government Lot 8; thence South and parallel with the west line of said Government Lot 8 to a point which is 612.9 feet North of the South line of said Lot 8; thence west at right angles to east line of premises first above described. That part of Lot 1, Block 1 of said Wanner Addition described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Lot 1; thence North along the East line of said Lot 1, a distance of 23.4 feet; thence West parallel with the South line of said Lot 1 a distance of 101 feet; thence South parallel with the East line of said Lot 1, a distance of 22.4 feet; thence West parallel with the South line of said Lot 1 to the West line of said Lot 1; thence South along the West line of said Lot 1 a distance of 1 foot to the Southwest corner of said Lot 1; thence East along the South line of said Lot 1 to the point of beginning. That part of Government Lot 8, Section 28, Township 117 North, Range 21 West, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point located on a line drawn between the following described points; Point 1 located on a line parallel with and distant 221.8 feet East of the West line of said Government Lot 8, which point is distant South 259.4 feet from the Intersection of the center line of Eden Prairie Road and said line; and Point 2 located on the South line of said Government Lot 8, 246.8 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Government Lot 8; said point of beginning being 647.9 feet from the South line of said Government Lot 8; thence Northerly along said drawn line 25 feet; thence Easterly and at right angles a distance of 90 feet; thence Southerly and parallel with said drawn line 25 feet; thence Westerly and at right angles to point of beginning. ADOPTED this 2nd day of October, 1989. ATTEST: Executive Director -2- Chairman 0 ESTABLISHED 1888 THE KUNZ OIL COMPANY Phone(612)920 -9373 5200 Eden Circle • P.O. Box 24107 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55436 September 25, 1989 Mr. Gordon Hughes, Director Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina 4801 West 50th St. Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Mr. Hughes My property at 5200 Eden Circle, Edina, is in the Grandview Redevelopment District and I understand that the H.R.A. of Edina wishes to develop this property. If you wish to acquire this property, you must exercise your right of eminent domain. We will not voluntarily sell this property. SiW unz President /Owner Kunz Oil LEWIS ENGINEERING W S EN E G COMPAN Y 5229 EDEN AVENUE - MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55436 - (612) 920 -6161 September 25, 1989 Mr. Gordon Hughes, Director Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Hughes, My property at 5229 Eden Avenue, Edina, is in the Grandview Redevelopment district and I understand that the H.R.A. of Edina wishes to develop this property. If you wish to acquire this property, you must exercise your right of eminent domain. We will not voluntarily sell this property. Yours very truly, ordon C. Lewis JJ 9 RESOLUTION WHEREAS, it is necessary, advisable, and in the public interest that the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota,-acquire for redevelopment purposes, and pursuant to the redevelopment plan entitled "Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan" dated May 30, 1984, adopted by the HRA on June 18, 1984, and approved by the City Council of the City of Edina on June 18, 1984, property within the Grandview redevelopment area; and WHEREAS, in order to accomplish the purposes set out in said Plan, it is necessary that the properties described on Exhibit A attached hereto and hereby made a part be redeveloped; and WHEREAS, the HRA has been advised that said property will not be made available for redevelopment unless it is acquired by eminent domain; and WHEREAS, by reason of the inability of any private party to purchase said property for redevelopment, it will be necessary to procure the same by the right of eminent domain. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the HRA proceed to procure the property described on Exhibit A hereto under its right of eminent domain if it is not made available for redevelopment by sale to a private party.or parties; and that the attorneys for the HRA be instructed and directed to file the necessary petition therefor and to prosecute such action to a successful conclusion, or until it is abandoned, dismissed or terminated by the HRA or by the Court; and that the attorneys for the HRA, the Director and Executive Director of the HRA and the Chairman and Secretary of the HRA do all things necessary to be done in the commencement, prosecution and successful termination of such eminent domain proceeding. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that none of the foregoing actions to acquire the property described on Exhibit A hereto be started or undertaken until the HRA has signed and delivered a contract for redevelopment of said property with a redeveloper, and on terms and conditions, acceptable to the HRA, and that the Tax Increment Financing Plan be amended in accordance with Minnesota Statute 469.175. subd.(4). ADOPTED BY THE Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota this day of , 1989. Attest: Executive Director Chairman EXHIBIT A Lot 1, Block 1, Wanner Addition, EXCEPT that part described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Lot 1; thence. North along -the East line of said Lot 1, a distance of 23.4 feet; thence West parallel with the South line of said Lot 1 a distance of 101 feet; thence South parallel with the East line of said Lot 1, a distance of 22.4 feet; thence West parallel with the South line of said Lot 1 to the West line of said Lot 1; thence South along the West line of said Lot 1 a distance of 1 foot to the Southwest corner of said Lot 1; thence East along the South line of said Lot 1 to' the point of beginning. and Lot It Block 1, "Edenmoor, Hennepin County, Minnesota ", EXCEPT the South six (6) feet thereof. and That part of Government Lot 8, Section 28, Township 117 North, Range 21 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying Southerly of the South line of Eden Avenue, Westerly of the West right of way line of the Minneapolis Northfield and Southern Railway and Easterly of Block 1, Wanner Addition, EXCEPT that part described as follows; Commencing at the Northeast corner of Lot 2, Block 1, Wanner Addition; thence North a distance of 25 feet.; thence West. a distance of 90 feet to the East line of Lot 1, Block 1, Wanner Addition; thence South a distance of 25 feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot 1; thence East a distance of 90 feet to the point of beginning. Also, Lot 2, Block Is Manner Addition, according to the map or plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for said Hennepin County, subject to an easement for roadway purposes over and across the South 25 feet of said Lot 2, and together with an easement for roadway purposes over and across the North 25 feet of Lot 3, Block 1 of'said Wanner Addition; also together with an easement for road purposes over a strip of land 16 feet in width being 8 feet on each side of the following described line: Commencing at a point on the south line of Eden Prairie Road 358 feet due East from the Nest line of said Government Lot 8; thence South and parallel with the west line of said Government Lot 8 to a point which is 612.9 feet North of the south line of said Lot 8; thence west at right angles to east line of premises first above described. That part of Lot 1, Block 1 of said wanner Addition described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Lot 1; thence North along the East line of said Lot 1, a distance of 23.4 feet; thence west parallel with the South line of said Lot i a distance of 101 feet; thence South parallel with the East line of said Lot 1, a distance of 22.4 feet; thence west parallel with the South line of said Lot 1 to the west line of said Lot 1; thence South along the west line of said Lot i a distance of 1 foot to the southwest corner of said Lot Its thence East along the South line of said Lot 1 to the point of beginning. That part of Government Lot 8, Section 28, Township 117 North, Range 21 west, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point located on a line drawn between the following described points; Point 1 located on a line parallel with and distant 221.8 feet East of the West line of said Government Lot 8, which point is distant South 259.4 feet from the Intersection of the center line of Eden Prairie Road and said line; and Point 2 located on the South line of said Government Lot 8, 246.8 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Government Lot 8; said point of beginning being 647.9 feet from the South line of said Government Lot .8; thence Northerly along said drawn line'25 feet; thence Easterly and at right angles a distance of 90 feet; thence Southerly and parallel with said drawn line 25 feet; thence Westerly and at right angles to point of beginning. e - - ��� ,� � , > r � � .� , � = ��LLi.,11�.a�.L�:L1.1�1 1111_1_l L: � r . � � i jilt .1 LA L Lj -i 7L in I -1-1 R Ir MA, 1 GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN Edina, Minnesota May 30, 1984 n' r� TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Inventory A. Existing Land Use, Zoning B. Natural Features C. Utilities D. Traffic - Circulation E. Existing Plans II. Problem Assessment A. Land Use B. Traffic III. Redevelopment Plan A. Goals and Objectives B. Land Use C. Parking and Circulation D. Urban Design - Landscaping E. Relocation F. Project Cost and Method of Financing G. Initial Redevelopment Project I. INVENTORY Introduction The Grandview area is mixed use commercial areas in North Central Edina. Much of the development in the area occured during the early 1950's along Vernon Avenue which was then Highway 169/212. The Grandview Redevelopment Plan Area, as proposed in this document, is shown on Exhibit 1. The Plan Area is bounded roughly by Highway 100 on the east, Vernon Avenue on the north and west and Eden Avenue on the south. A. Existing Land Use, Zoning The Grandview area contains a mixture of residential commerical and industrial uses. Existing land uses of individual parcels are shown on the attached Exhibit .2. The plan area contains approximately 66 acres and, with the exception of one parcel is completely developed. The central portion of the plan area is presently developed with retail commercial uses along Vernon Avenue and public owned industrial uses along the north side of Eden Avenue. The area north and west of Vernon Avenue is developed with a mixture of single- family residential and commerical uses. The area south of Eden Avenue is industrial with a small amount of office. Our Lady of Grace Church and School borders the area on GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN Plan Area EXHIBIT 1 Zlo 2, AVE - - -r-- z z :7 -e 17 -.c Pa L Z ? J 5 1 4 3 U'- 49 Q 3 m 0 50 Ze 9 to -' 117 m 3 2 2 Z, - L 46. .1 _ o 9 20 9 z EEK > m 10 to 29 :0 7.. 5 1 30 kk 0 6 2 �4 .1 12 17 I 12 17 .2 12 11610 7 al 13 .16 6 3 hi '110 R.L. NO. 2 12 6 ST. 5,, R.,.- A., -Vi-j [-17-7- 2 ..14 2 20. I % 22 3 3 1393 23 A, :z? 19 i! 4 m 4 'z 7 m is 3 20 5 z 21 8 ';xz 4 Or. 4 pp 7 I 20 9 m 16 5 m 4 tX L _1; 17 17 Is 19 to '5 66 5z UP 5.. 1 j 'pif , V? is 17 #kL Is. 14 '10 10 15 < 6 !Uf . 4-- IS 0 !q •IT 12 13 a 7 7 E -- �vl I is 1 13 . v. 12 .9 0. - ----- 60 15 W. ia 7. 'flei (00) 7 3 07y C) Z .14 z 0 < 4z, 3 < a D 'b 12 4' a r. 4 'b r 5 fa fn 6 r 2 1-w- i 3v rtDFN - 2 4 1: 5 i 6 41 rn 0 C]Rr 0 ♦ O 10 0 4 46' 's z *0 0 4 12 2 1 L 5 EDEN 771-- the southeast. The entire Plan area is bisected north to south by the Soo Line railroad right of way. Exhibit 3 illustrates the present zoning classification of all parcels within the plan area. Although most of the existing uses in the area are permitted principal uses, according to the Zoning Ordinance, many exhibit non- conforming features. Most commerically zoned properties are non - conforming in terms of parking quantity and parking setbacks. Outdoor storage, exterior building materials, parking and building setbacks are common problems in the industrially zoned properties. B. Natural Features Since the plan area is completely developed, there are no areas where the original landscape has not been altered._ The existing topography does, however, limit the logical and efficient development and redevelopment of the area. In the central portion of the plan area there is a 35 foot grade differential between the intersection of Vernon and Interlachen and the intersection of Eden and Brookside Avenues. This grade difference prevents the area from acting as a compact and cohesive shopping area. C. Utilities Existing utilties serving the plan area are illustrated on Exhibits 4, 5, and 6. Generally, existing public utilties are i W Q 1� Q N 9 DIVISON 9T g" a g" t 9 a 9 try �Q LIFT ST..A y ^ 7 - O ku Q C ° L° p EDINBROOK L n J 2 a W� 1111 O o > w 48 3To IO P g .: g,. G W 48 ST o _ \6 WOOD H I COJPER HOLLY WOO R D N MILL Cr — 40 15 CIR. o ,, POND m > 0 15" >I ORGHAR LA .� A o• m i PL � : = U, J 'n i g 9 d L) N )• T I ��= N J 49ST3 j G O� co ¢ o I I r W HILLTC CS ?• W ~ Q ' > w31 S7 cn 4 W a g,. o Z� 1 trJC 9 m f 4 vl a 2 cr Q ki X LL X J O ° J Z Q m _ • air pJ� Q• Q 1 w.sz sr � 9 o _ a QEN V r p - y E' r o 3 O = a o wS3 O ¢ �' Cr Cc's Z 9 3 cr W C - 0 EDENNIORE ST MOND OR 9 �- r� o P RI _ 9• GC _ -3 g WINDSOR AVE 7Q b r WINDSOR 9 AVE a i r / °O GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN i y P4 W. g:. v �-'� �' •- `- Exhibit 4 cl poi 4 — 199} 4 LIFT S Ta —� Sanitary Sewer P. iOGEQ r 0) fl► i ' RO9 >� t w 7 ST Q ' Qtr � ., _ - • j• � �QP ' w I I ' - +` DIVISION ST 8•. c E" o o �i O Q 6 m 1 i BF J// Y vkw Q W > a w > _ - o it _ I W E01 00KLA O z 1 , O .r 16W 48 3:0 6 6.. 6.. o° W W48STY n ¢ / 0 ODHI / HOLLYWOOD RD Y MILL m w / a IAftq. LA O POND = a z 1 ¢_ to a t ++ y > N , 1 •_ 12 12 J 9ST3 z C QP HILLTOP LA a a > 8° o I � W u 1 W51 ST a 8 4; U to Ic y1D Gn db J i U pe m 2 � Q J Y � m 's I2112M Q 10■ W -52 ST VILLA r, WAY- o J 3 - _ APTS, a O S 6 PRIVATE to Z 3 'tp FRUMP :. t o W o 900 6 P �� /4.. ... . EDEN ST g 6., - u a +. R . MOND DRIS Co - . . +� 6.+ 6 RI g'. GOLF 6 RICH OW 6 n WIId1*OR v' AVE �" + I s G' LAKE WINOS- S AVE a c GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN / 0 Q� Q4 6 Y 56 V Exhibit 5 a 3 Public Water I 7 > T y r f F 100 b• r -, ¢ I SuNNYSIDE 1 BPCKapi¢ �� MOORE A I W W h CREEK a QW . 2 r _ ` ` il. r pIVISCN ST 14• 2. it r // `\ li W 9R e a prP r IN 2. NN 1 y W \ a ¢ W Q r ��r W �� Z p J p EDINBRUOK L d \ \ 3 Q W W 0 \ �_ C L!-- j W �e ST J _ �M r y ;' m P z�• W48STU _ o WOOD H 1 ..4 :..:.. to ..1 HOLLY RD C PO ND oD a f a CL } \ I Y iARQLA - � m PL I to J Z 1 1 w• 1y 1 . ` J 49ST3 � p O 1 gc¢ 3 Q t y W HILLTOP LA W ' ' W J Q Q 9 W �. WSI ST a Z C y � J Q m p X 1i J Y p O O 2 Q a W.52 ST J p 3 z t WV,. z 3 W p W . 0 cr EDENMORE ST � y P O Al oG O A\ �M'G al MpNO- — DR — �v- -- -- r_nl c ~ R WjV RICKWOOD Is s 0 GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN WINDSOR AVE a a Exhibit 6 / W Storm Sewer pp x tia r 4 W v 36 v ►�� p a 3 yy` V. adequate to serve existing development in the area. However, three existing homes on Summit Avenue do not have access to public water or sanitary sewer service. The southerly portion of _the Soo line Railroad property is not presently served by storm sewer. Generally, private utilities have been placed underground along along Vernon Avenue, but remain above ground in most other portions of the area. D. Traffic - Circulation Vernon Avenue, which serves as a major feeder to Highway 100, provides the prinicipal retail- commerical orientation for the area. Interlachen Boulevard provides access to the area from northwestern Edina. Average daily traffic volumes for Grandview Area streets are illustrated.on Exhibit 7. Vernon Avenue which carries approximately 15,000 vehicles per day serves as the principal artery through the area and is also the main orientation for retail commericial uses in the area. Arcadia Avenue and Eden Aveue provide secondary orientation of commercial- office uses. E. Existing Plans The City's Comprehensive Plan 1980 states that the Grandview Area exhibits signs of "blight, inappropriate land use, and non - conforming uses ". One of the Comprehensive Plan's policies recommends that a detailed study of the area be undertaken to determine the feasibility of a public redevelopment January 1984 Grandview Area EXHIBIT , Traffic Study e project. The Plan also contains the following policies relative to the Grandview Area: * Encourage the re -use of obsolete or under utilized commerical and industrial properties for multiple residential purposes. * Discourage the further extension of commercial uses along Vernon Avenue. * Encourage the intensification of residential uses in the Grandview Area. The Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan also contains the following general policies relating to commercial uses * Cooperate with commercial district owners seeking to improve circulation and off - street parking in smaller.commerial areas. - * Eliminate non - conforming land uses. * Encourage redevelopment of under utilized parcels. * Prevent strip commercial areas. II. PROBLEM ASSESSMENT A. Land Use Land use relationships in the Grandview Area have changed many times over the years. These changes have caused some obsolete land uses in the district as well as parcels that do not allow efficient and logical development or redevelopment. The growth of Jerry's Supermarket and other retail uses in the central portion of the plan area has caused the complex of industrial buildings located west of the railroad tracks to become inappropriate in their present location because of access problems and their proximity to retail commercial uses. The Biltmore Motel once a thriving business has become obsolete due to its lack of exposure to a major highway. The School District maintains its bus storage facility adjacent to Eden Avenue, south of Jerry's Supermarket. The use of this site and-the condition of the buildings create a blighting influence in the area. The bus garage is extremely non - conforming with the Planned Industrial District (PID) of the City's Zoning Ordinance. Building and parking setbacks, construction and materials, lot area and landscaping are among the problems with this site. The Super America station, a doctor's office and a car wash are uses located westerly of the school bus site. The car wash is a non- conforming transitional use. It remains from an ealier partial redevelopment of the site that saw a restaurant converted to a doctor's office. The resulting division of the property left the car wash with a narrow, irregular parcel with frontage on two streets. The site is non - conforming; i.t does not relate well to adjacent uses and is a visual blight on the area. The commercial- office uses located south of Eden Avenue in the vicinity of Eden Circle are generally in good condition and conforming, but they could encounter accessibility problems if intersection improvements occur nearby. Lewis Engineering, Kunz Oil, and the Soo Line Railroad property, are all zoned PID. The Railroad property is currently vacant. The property, has remained vacant for some time after the site was cleared and graded. Redevelopment of this site will be very difficult.due to the long and irregular shape of the site. Kunz Oil and Lewis Engineering sites are non - conforming with regard to building and parking setbacks, exterior building materials and landscaping. An additional blighting influence is the large amount of .outdoor materials storage on the Lewis Engineering site. Under .utilized sites, obsolete uses, and an inadequate street pattern are problems existing in the northeasterly portion of area which is occupied by Jerry Leonard's Clothing, a small office building and the Biltmore Bowl. The area is chopped up by street pattern which severely limits the full utilization of all the properties. A public street separates the bowling alley from its parking lot. Due to lack of convenient access and visibility the bowling alley has become an obsolete use. The area north and west of Vernon Avenue is comprised of a variety of commercial and multi - family uses that back up to existing single dwelling unit neighborhoods. In many cases the separation between single dwelling uses and multi- family and commercial uses is inadequate due to proximity of lack of sufficient buffering. This part of the area shares some characteristics of strip commercial development. In the central, commercial, portion of the area there is a parking shortage. The amount of parking has not kept pace with the growth of retail activity in the area. In addition, due.to the grades and arrangement of parking facilities the efficiency of the parking is reduced, especially in the winter months. The existing arrangement of streets, buildings, and the railroad _ right of way makes the provision of more an improved parking very difficult. Structurally substandard buildings and buildings found to require substantial renovation or clearance to remedy problems such as incompatible land uses, overcrowding of buildings on the land and obsolete buildings not suitable for improvement or GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVEOPMENT PLAN Problem,Summary s[� t. L1._j =o � •N O C/ CO J EXHIBIT 8 r- �Q �I non - conforming uses, obsolete buildings, inadequate street layout, and incompatible land uses substandard buildings traffic- circulation problems conversion are shown on Exhibit 8. B. Traffic As identified in the "Grandview Area Traffic Study ", prepared by BRW, Inc., most traffic problems in the district occur along Vernon Avenue. Arcadia Avenue, a north -south connection between Vernon Avenue /West .50th Stret and Eden Avenue, and Summit Avenue were other identified traffic concerns in the area. The Traffic Study identified five issue areas within the Plan area. Summarized below are the problems associated with each issue area (Exhibit 9): * Issue Area One. Confusing and difficult intersection of Vernon Avenue and Eden Avenue /West 53rd Street. Access to redevelopment of the Motel with multi - family residential. Access to the Sherwood Road neighborhood. Through traffic in the Grandview area. * Issue Area Two. Access to and from Summit Avenue to Vernon Avenue and Interlachen Boulevard. PIP '•laq 4^ AV 1 !� 4 - Y Y !.� �. � I .nom'. f�'t '.. _ - 11: ��'' 7 U- 71 jq .•�� r ,.t-,. -. �. f �� no- �. �q�'- "tt'a ., t ft�'8- ..r�, ` I a. •�`� .A��'� Mfrs- 4���`'�:` _ x � `� ^ a•. �' �i 2+.11 � � � 1 < � • •' ! a tip.. i,S - .N � a"'" ti r ` 't• -• � e �. ' � r ( _ _ � yr �,� a � . it f y •ss�.4� T - a +�. - 1'� • a b•�il � v Y � mow` i4 ' "k'`rrn ¢ � 1 _s ' p _ '� �k �s.i• ���I � M� `+ice :w � a. �. � a ....� .fwS.F ` � - .°t �J� 0.4. V nl ` ann .f. �b • � :...' January 1984 Grandview Area Traffic Study EXHIBIT 9 Y w� sae as 3f ♦� M� !� 4 - Y Y !.� �. � I .nom'. f�'t '.. _ - 11: ��'' 7 U- 71 jq .•�� r ,.t-,. -. �. f �� no- �. �q�'- "tt'a ., t ft�'8- ..r�, ` I a. •�`� .A��'� Mfrs- 4���`'�:` _ x � `� ^ a•. �' �i 2+.11 � � � 1 < � • •' ! a tip.. i,S - .N � a"'" ti r ` 't• -• � e �. ' � r ( _ _ � yr �,� a � . it f y •ss�.4� T - a +�. - 1'� • a b•�il � v Y � mow` i4 ' "k'`rrn ¢ � 1 _s ' p _ '� �k �s.i• ���I � M� `+ice :w � a. �. � a ....� .fwS.F ` � - .°t �J� 0.4. V nl ` ann .f. �b • � :...' January 1984 Grandview Area Traffic Study EXHIBIT 9 * Issue Area Three. Through traffic capacity and the need for exclusive turning lanes at the intersection of Vernon and Interlachen. Excess speed of traffic exiting southbound Highway 100 to westbound Vernon Avenue Avenue. * Issue Area Four. The effect of closing the Arcadia Avenue access to Vernon * Issue Area Five. Need to limit the number of uncontrolled access points to Vernon Avenue. Lack of major access point to shopping center. III. Redevelopment Plan The problem assessment and the problem summary (Exhibit 8) support the conclusion that certain redevelopment activities in the Plan area are warranted. These problems cannot be corrected by private enterprise or regulation alone. In order to correct problems identified herein and to acheive redevelopment in the plan area in a'timely manner, and in conformance with the Land Use Plan, a tax increment plan should be established and certain tax increment projects be undertaken. Based upon the need demonstrated in the inventory and problem assessment, the following goals and objectives are established for the Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan: 1. To promote development and redevelopment in a manner consistent with the policies set forth in the City's Comprehensive Plan 1980. 2. To promote and secure development and redevelopment in a manner that allows the most logical and efficient arrangement and intensity of land uses. 3. To improve the efficiency of the street and roadway system and to reduce traffic conflicts and automobile pedestrian conflicts through the implementation of the recommended changes, . set forth in the Grandview Area Traffic Study, as modified. 4. To promote and secure the retention of existing jobs and to gain new employment opportunities in the area. 5. To promote and secure development and redevelopment in a manner that will have minimal adverse impact on the environment. 6. To promote and secure certain public improvements, including public parking facilities. 7. To undertake certain land acquisition, parcel assembly and parcel disposition necessary to eliminate certain substandard and non - conforming uses and buildings, to assemble logical, conforming and more efficient building sites. 8. To eliminate threats to the quality of ground water supplies through the elimination of existing on -site sewage disposal systems. 9. To promote the reuse of obsolete land uses on the periphery of the district for multi - family residential uses in accordance with the Land Use Plan. 10. To promote and secure the redevelopment of non- conforming land uses and substandard buildings in a way Land Use which provides a clearer definition of land uses and more efficient utilization of parcels. 11. To promote and secure increased landscaping on private property and public rights of way to improve the asthetics, provide identity for the commerical area and improve transitions along the area's perimeter. The Land Use Plan emphasizes the redevelopment of non= conforming uses and substandard buildings in the Grandview Area. In addition, the Plan anticipates that certain infill development and redevelopment will occur. This development and redevelopment should be principally accomplished privately in a manner consistent with the needs of the surrounding neighborhood and the City as a whole. Public acquisition of private property for redevelopment is to be kept at an absolute minimum. However, in some cases. public acquisition, clearance, and parcel assembly may be the only efficient and expedient approach to desired redevelopment. This may be'the case in the industrial area south of Eden Avenue. In addition, small amounts of additional right of way will be necessary to accomplish planned street improvements. The Land Use Plan anticipates the following net additions in floor area to Grandview Plan Area: Commerical /Retail 20,000 square feet Office 190,000 square feet Office Warehouse 65,000 square feet Residential 82 Units Parking and Circulation The BRW, Inc., "Traffic Study ", incorporated herein by reference, identifies five issue areas in the Grandview area. The major recommendations of the study to be implemented by the Plan are summarized below: 1. Created three major, signalzed intersections along Vernon Avenue; one at Link Road; one as the major entrance /exit for Jerry's foods, First Bank and Union Oil; and an improved intersection with turn lanes at the Vernon/ Interlachen intersection. 2. Close several access points and.driveways along Vernon Avenue to improve traffic flow and discourage through traffic in surrounding single dwelling areas. 3. Close the Vernon /Sherwood /Eden Avenue intersection and rely on the new Link Road intersection. •— �w�ey, ♦ —g Alryas .* •. "¢ � , ��:� , ''� — '' ;- ,►w?. L ,_3. t r der � , a `� . •� � i � �x �- w� Y � w. } .•yam y;�s.e., � s• ' 4 � i ,�� 4+'• �►til _ t `,��,.ea'..� +_ KTl.s Y :, ' t • •�' _ tom. \\- k.3 �" S' F3-.eC aTaw - .. �'. '.l fit' •'•.' Op- ON _ .4 y& .. /J "a1� �.� S ,� 'i..� • a sal., � AS' LK•�� k a • .' t �'�' � ) �,,ti r. �. fir',. �•_, j �, � wL,4� -.�iyd,�^ i i ,,� • .} _ � /. '`��� r�� y• er.iy .• �b'-'•.:Y:.- 5�p'�,""} a �. s. � I,`� , �st�, �'�'R�ij: -ay- � + �� � '�'"��� !171 •� '\ L ',.� (� 3• * a 1. �( r + • . k` 4 . +.. . r - • t �i f�.r" Ott 1 r _ � � - ;� .. ..�*.1 r:: � •$il��i�.'3�.i'aL{`' "a � ..... January 1984 Grandview Area.' rea EXHIBIT 10 j Traffic Study ., .1 •v A y 4 �+ � y.. _ •�. t T--' -poi.. _ .�• � � .'� :; \ :�"t -3`3� +t. A QAM i id �! Zo- MOVIFICAIT It ikF C, j' i �s ? .r�•i jR� �. � _ � �. .► X41 j�y(r�+9Rl ry , J��:. �� �- ,� � �` „• :rte �>A� �, . + j �2, 73"m Tt Su• �_- ". • `.is. ' 'S!' •L f R rr'n ' January 1984 Grandview Area Exhibit 11 Traffic Study 4. Close the Arcadia to Vernon Access, redo the south- bound off ramp from Highway 100 and widen the bridge over the railroad tracks. Exhibit 10, taken from the BRW Traffic Study, summarizes the proposed roadway improvements for the Grandview Area. All recommended improvements are to be constructed as proposed with the exception of the link from Arcadia Avenue to the intersection of Vernon Avenue and Interlachen Boulevard. In order to create a more unified development site in the vicinity of the bowling alley the bridge will be moved south and the link to Arcadia will be realigned to the southerly portion of the bowling alley property as shown on Exhibit 11. In the central portion of the district on parcels now occupied 'by the City storage facility buildings, a parking ramp containing approximately 400 spaces will be constructed. The ramp will be constructed in two phases with approximately 200 spaces in each phase. Urban Design - Landscaping All devlopment, redevelopment and street improvements in the Plan Area should address the following standards: * Screening and buffering non - residential uses from surrounding single family neighborhoods. * Improved perimeter and boulevard landscaping. * Improved screening and landscaping of parking lots. * Existing above ground utilities should be placed underground whenever possible in connection with development, redevelopment and street improvements. Relocation The Plan does not anticipate that 'there will be any acquisition of private property or relocation of persons or businesses until at least Phase II Redevelopment Project. It is the intent of the H.R.A. that current owners of properties designated for redevelopment be party to efforts to redevelop their properties. If some or all of the owners of the subject property are unwilling or unable to redevelop their property and the H.R.A. must acquire and dispose of the property, the H.R.A., will comply with all applicable requirements of the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, and all applicable Minnesota State Statutes. The H.R.A. will provide staff for on -site relocation counseling for tenants and information on their rights relative to relocation services and payments. Project Costs and Methods of Financing The gross cost of public improvements and facilities including right of way acquisition, but not including acquisition for redevelopment purposes is estimated to be approximately $4,500,000. It is proposed that the public redevelopment cost should be paid by the issuance of general obligation bonds of the City of Edina, upon request of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (H.R.A.) as projects are undertaken, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462, and Sections 273.71 to 273.86. All tax increments received by the H.R.A. with respect to Redevelopment Projects, a -n d all revenues received from lands in Project Areas while owned by the HRA, shall be pledged and appropriated by it for the payment of the principal of and interest on said general obligation bonds to be issued by the City in a- .id of the project. Such pledge shall be made by written agreement between the H.R.A.. and the City Council,.and filed with the County auditor. It is currently contemplated that a certain amount of the gross cost, up to 20 percent of $4,500,000 will be received from . - the City. The City will obtain the funds to pay this cost by the levy of special assessments against properties specially benefited by the provision of contemplated public improvements and facilities. Initial Redevelopment Project The initial phase of the redevelopment is based upon the need to finance a public cost of $2,000,000 through the sale of general obligation bonds. The public costs of the initial phase are as follows: * Construction of signalized intersection at Link Road and Vernon Avenue. * Close intersection of Eden "Avenue, Sherwood Road and Vernon Avenue. * Demolish the City storage facility. * Construction of two level parking facility on storage facility site. The increased taxable value creating the tax increment necessary to make principal and interest payments on the bond issue will be provided by the following development and redevelopment in the project area. * Construction of 8 townhouse units. * Construction of 77 condominium units * Construction of approximately 70,000 square feet of office space. * Construction of approxmately,8,000 square feet of retail space. 0 a GRANDVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 TO BE UNDERTAKEN PURSUANT TO THE GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND GRANDVIEW TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN of THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Table of Contents I. Introduction A. Statement of Authority B. Definitions C. Statement of Need D. Statement of Objectives II. Redevelopment Project A. Description of Project 1. Project Area 2.- Conditions of Blight. 3. Redevelopment Activities B. Preparation of Property C. Relocation _ III. Financing of Public Redevelopment Cost A. Determination of Public Redevelopment Cost 1. Estimated Total Public Cost 2. Capital Proceeds of Project 3. Public Redevelopment Cost B. Payment of Public Redevelopment Cost 1. In General 2. Issuance of Bonds 3. Bond Terms 4. Security for and Payment of Bonds C. Determination and Use of Tax Increment 1. Tax Increment Financing District 2. Original Assessed Value 3. Adjustment to Original Assessed Value 4. Assured Value; Captured Assessed Value 5. Duration of District 6. Payment and Discharge of Bonds; Use of Tax Increment 7. Use of Captured Assessed Value and Tax Increment D. Impact of Tax Increment Financing IV. Implementation of Project and Plan A. In General B. Cooperation-Agreement V. Amendments to Plan VI. Exhibits Exhibit A'.- Legal description of tax parcels or portions thereof included in Project Area and Tax Increment Financing District I. INTRODUCTION A. Statement of Authority. This Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan Plan relates to Grandview Redevelopment Project No. 1 of the HRA. The Project is established by action of the Commissioners of the HRA and the City Council of the City, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter.462, and this Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan is approved and adopted by such bodies pursuant to Minnesota Statutes., Sections 273.71 to 273.86. B. Definitions. Each of the words and terms defined in this Section shall for all purposes of this Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan, have the meanings given to them in this Section: "Assessed Value" means the Assessed Value of all taxable property in the District as determined from time to time pursuant to state law. "Bonds" means the Tax Increment Bonds and any other obligations issued by the City or the HRA, the principal of and interest on which is payable in whole or in part out of the Tax Increment, to finance or provide for.the payment of the Public Redevelopment Cost of the Project. "Bond Resolution" means any and all resolutions, ordinances, trust indentures or other documents under which any Bonds are sold, issued or secured. "Capital Proceeds of the Project" means all amounts received or to be received by the City or the HRA from the sale or lease of property in the Project Area. "Captured Assessed Value" means that portion of the Assessed Value in excess of the Original Assessed Value as adjusted from time to time, if any. Minnesota "City" means the City of Edina, Hennepin County, . "District" means the Grandview Tax Increment Financing District established pursuant to the Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan containing the land area included in the Project Area. "Grandview Redevelopment Plan" means the Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan as approved and amended from time to time by the HRA and the City Council pursuant to law. "Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan"-means this Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Project as approved and amended from time to time by the HRA and the City Council pursuant to law. "HRA" means the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Edina. "Municipal Storage Facility means the storage facility of the City located on Parcels B and C described in Exhibit A. "Original Assessed Value" means the Assessed Value of all taxable property in the District as most recently determined by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota, as,of the date of certification thereof by the County Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.76, or as thereafter adjusted and certified by the County Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.76. "Outstanding" when used with respect to Tax Increment Bonds, means Bonds which have not been paid, redeemed and prepaid or discharged in accordance with their terms or the terms of a Bond Resolution. "Parcel" means a lot, parcel, tract or plat of land comprising a single unit for purposes of assessment for real estate purposes, as of the date of adoption of this Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan. "Plan" means the Grandview Redevelopment Plan and this Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan. "Parking Facilities" means the parking ramp containing ° approximately 4 parking levels and 400 parking spaces to be constructed in two phases by the HRA on Parcels B and C described in Exhibit A. "Project" means Grandview Redevelopment Project No. 1, and-the Redevelopment Activities described in Section II -A -3 hereof to be undertaken with respect thereto. "Project Area" means the land area or Parcels described in Exhibit A to this Plan. "Public Redevelopment Cost" means the total amount expended and to be expended by the City and /or the HRA on Redevelopment Activities, less the Capital Proceeds of the Project. -2- "Redevelopment Activities" means all actions taken or to be taken by the HRA in establishing, implementing and carrying out the Project and the Plan and by the City in aid of the Project pursuant to the Plan, including, but not limited to, the activities described in Section II -A -3 hereof. "Tax Increment" means that portion of the ad valorem taxes levied on all taxable property in the District from time to time which is allocable to the Captured Assessed Value of such property. "Tax Increment Bonds" means the approximately $4,500,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds to be issued in one or more series by the City or the HRA to finance all or a portion of the Public Redevelopment Cost. C. Statement of Need. There is a need for redevelopment of the Project Area which will result in the increase of employment opportunities for residents of the City, . the increase of the value of property subject to taxation by the City and other local government units, and the increase of general economic activity in the City, all of which will reduce unemployment, correct inadequate street layout and reduce traffic hazards, provide necessary public parking facilities, improve living conditions, promote desirable redevelopment of land.a portion of which is presently occupied by buildings. which contain defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, including, access to public sewer, light and ventilation and fire protection, layout, which defects or deficiencies are of total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance, and a portion of which is presently occupied by buildings which require substantial renovation or clearance because of conditions such as inadequate street layout, unusual grade conditions, incompatible uses or land use relationships and obsolesence to the extent such buildings are not suitable for improvement or conversion at a cost reasonably related to the public purpose to be served without major residential clearance and with full consideration of the preservation of beneficial aspects of the urban and natural environment, prevent the emergence of blighted property and areas, and encourage and enhance the general health and welfare of the residents -of the City. The actions herein proposed to be taken by the HRA and the City with respect to the Project are necessary to secure the redevelopment of the property included in the Project Area, at this time and in a manner which will best meet those needs. D. Statement of Objectives. The objectives sought to be accomplished by the HRA and the City in establishing and -3- carrying out the Project and in financing of the Public Redevelopment Cost thereof, as specified herein, are to meet the needs specified in paragraph C: a. by promoting and securing the prompt redevelopment of the property in the Project Area in a manner consistent with applicable governmental comprehensive plans and with a minimal adverse impact on the environment, a portion of which property is not now in productive use; b. by promoting and securing additional employment opportunities for residents of the City and surrounding area, thereby improving living standards and reducing unemployment; c. by reducing traffic hazards; d. by promoting and securing necessary public parking facilities; e. by securing the increase of proPerty subject to taxation by the City, Hennepin County and Independent School District No. 273, and other local government taxing jurisdictions, in order to better enable such entities to pay for public improvements and governmental services and programs required to be provided by them; and f. by undertaking and providing moneys for the payment of the cost of Redevelopment Activities in or adjacent to the Project Area, which are necessary to serve the Project Area and for the orderly and beneficial development of the Project Area and adjacent areas of the City. II. REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT A. Description of Project. 1. Project Area.. The Project Area comprises approximately 60 acres of property located in the City. The property identification number of each Parcel included in the Project Area are as set forth in the attached Exhibit A which comprises -part of this Plan. The Project Area comprises 52 Parcels designated AA through zz, inclusive. 2. Conditions of Blight. The Project Area is blighted by virtue of inadequate street layout resulting in traffic hazards, a shortage of public parking facilities -4- necessary for the commercial enterprises located in the Project Area, the location of buildings on Parcels B, C, F, G, H, R, U, X and Y described in Exhibit A which are structurally substandard because they contain defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, including, access to public sewer and water, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and conditions of interior partitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance and by buildings on Parcels A, I, J, K, L., M, S, T, V, W, Y, °'Z, AA, BB, and CC described in Exhibit A which require substantial renovation or clearance in order to remove such existing conditions as incompatible uses or land use relationships, overcrowding of buildings on the Land and obsolete buildings not suitable for improvement or conversion. However, the Project.Area is potentially useful and valuable for redevelopment which would contribute to the general health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City. The Project Area will not be reasonably available for redevelopment by private enterprise, or redeveloped by private enterprise, in the foreseeable future, unless the blighting conditions thereof are removed. The City and the HRA can remove, or cause or encourage. other parties to remove, such blighting conditions, and to redevelop the Project Area by the razing of the Municipal Storage Facility and constructing on that site the Parking Facilities and by constructing necessary street improvements, and in connection with such street improvements acquiring necessary rights -of -way, by jointly exercising the powers conferred upon them by law for this purpose. 3. Redevelopment Activities. The Project includes the following Redevelopment Activities by the City or the HRA, (a) the making of studies and planning and informational activities relating to the Project and the Plan; (b) the razing of the Municipal Storage Facilities and the construction on such site of the Parking Facilities in two phases; (c) the construction of.necessary street improvements and acquiring of necessary rights -of -way in.connection with a comprehensive redesign of the.roadway system in the Project.Area, including new entrances to the shopping center in the Project Area, a new intersection, new approaches and connections and elimination of certain intersections, access points and driveways; (d) the issuance of Tax Increment Bonds to finance all or part of the Public Redevelopment Cost of the Project; and (e) the use of the Tax Increment derived from the Project Area to pay the debt service on such Tax Increment Bonds, or otherwise pay the Public Redevelopment Cost of the Project. -5- No contracts have been entered into for Redevelopment Activities by the City or the HRA. At this time the City and the HRA reasonably expect that the following private developments are expected to take place in the Project Area: a. The existing Biltmore Hotel located on Parcel R will be razed and a condominium project containing seventy -seven units will be constructed on that site in two phases. The first phase is expected to contain twenty -nine units and be completed in Spring, 1986 and the second phase is expected to contain the remaining forty -eight units and be completed in Spring, 1987. b. Three existing single family homes located on Parcels F, G and H will be razed and a townhouse project containing eight units will be constructed on that site. c. The existing commercial and office uses located on Parcels P and Q will be expanded by the addition of approximately 36,000 square feet of floor area. Construction is expected to commence in Spring 1985. d. The existing commercial and office building located on Parcels I and J wil•1 be razed and an office building containing approximately 50,000 square feet will be constructed on that site. B. Preparation of Property For Parking Facilities. The Municipal Storage Facility will have to be razed or removed and necessary public utility connections, street repairs and other public amenities will need to be provided in connection with the construction on that site of the Parking Facilities. C. Relocation. No person will be displaced and have to be relocated as a result of the Project. III. FINANCING OF PUBLIC REDEVELOPMENT COST A. Determination of Public Redevelopment Cost. 1. Estimated Total Public Cost. The total costs expected to be incurred by the City and the HRA, directly or indirectly, in carrying out the Project are estimated to be as follows: a. Razing of Municipal Storage Facility $ 50,000 b. Construction of Parking Facilities 2,500,000 0 M. C. Street Improvements (including acquisi- 1,200,000 tion of necessary rights -of -way) , d. Capitalized Interest 560,000 e. Legal, Fiscal and Administrative 100,000 f. Bond Discount 90,000 Total Public Cost of Project $4,500,000 The items of cost and the amounts thereof shown above are estimated to be necessary based upon the best engineering, legal and other information now available. It is anticipated that the items of cost and the amounts thereof shown on each category above may decrease or increase, but that the Total Public Cost of the Project will not exceed the amount shown above. The City and the HRA reserve the right to pay the cost of any element of the.Total Public Cost of the Project from the proceeds of the Tax Increment Bonds herein authorized, or directly from Tax.Increments derived from the Project Area. 2. Capital Proceeds of Project. There are not expected to be any Capital Proceeds of the Project, comprising the cash proceeds of the sale of property in-the Project Area owned by the HRA to third parties.- 3. Public Redevelopment Cost. The Public Redevelopment Cost of the Project, comprising the total costs expected to be incurred by the City and the HRA, directly or indirectly, in carrying out the Project, less the Capital Proceeds thereof, is expected to be $4,500,000. B. Payment of Public Redevelopment Cost. 1. In General. The entire Public Redevelopment Cost of the Project will be paid from Tax Increment to be derived from the Project Area, either directly or indirectly by payment of debt service on the bonds issued to finance such Public Redevelopment Cost and from any special assessments which may be levied .against the property benefited by the Parking Facilities or street improvements. 2. Issuance of Bonds. It is presently expected that the Public Redevelopment Cost of the Project will be financed by the issuance of Tax Increment Bonds in the principal amount of $4,500,000. The Tax Increment Bonds will be issued by the City or the HRA under authority of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, and Sections 273.71 to 273.78: -7- 3. Bond Terms. The terms of the Bonds are expected to be as set forth below; however, the right is reserved to adjust any and all terms of the Bonds to secure the best interest rate obtainable and to insure that the entire principal of and interest on the Bonds will be paid when due from the sources specified in paragraph 4. The Tax Increment Bonds will be issued in one or more series, in the aggregate principal amount of $4,500,000, will mature serially over a period of approximately twenty -five (25) years from the date receipt by the HRA of the first Tax Increment from the District, commencing on or after June 1, 1988, will be subject to redemption prior to maturity, will bear a fixed rate or rates of interest from date of issue to maturity, payable semiannually commencing in.1985, and will be sold at public sale: 4. Security For And Payment Of Bonds. The Tax Increment Bonds will be general obligations of the City or the HRA, and the full faith and credit and the taxing powers of the City or the HRA will be pledged for their payment. The principal of and interest on the Tax Increment Bonds will be payable from the Tax Increments to be derived from the Project Area by the HRA, from any special assessments which may be levied against the property benefited by the Parking Facilities or street improvements and from ad valorem taxes to be levied on all taxable property in the City, but if necessary for the payment of additional ad valorem taxes will be required by law to be levied on all taxable property in the City, which taxes will not be subject to any limitation as to rate and amount. C. Determination and Use of Tax Increment. 1. Tax Increment Financing District. Seventy percent (700) of the Parcels in the Project Area are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities or other improvements and at least twenty percent (20 %) of the buildings in the Project Area contain defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions or similar- factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or,clearance, and at least an additional thirty percent (30 %) of the buildings in the Project Area require substantial renovation or clearance in order to remove such existing conditions as inadegaute street layout, incompatible uses or land use relationships, overcrowding of buildings on the land, excessive dwelling unit density, obsolete buildings not suitable for improvement or conversion. WE Therefore, the Project comprises and is designated as a "Tax Increment Financing District" and is a "Redevelopment District," as defined in and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.71 to 273.78; and is hereinafter called "the District." 2. Original Assessed Value. The Assessed Value of all taxable property in the District as most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota, being the certification made in 1983 with respect to the Assessed Value of such property as of January 1, 1983, for taxes payable in 1984 is estimated to be $4,418,948, which amount is expected to be the Original Assessed Value of such property. 3. Adjustment to Original Assessed Value. Under Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.76, Subdivision 1, the Hennepin County Auditor is required to certify, in each year after certification of the Original Assessed Value, the amount by which the Original Assessed Value has increased or decreased as a result of a change in tax exempt status of the Parcels in the District; and is directed to add to the Original Assessed Value an amount equal to the Assessed Value of the Parcels becoming taxable as most recently assessed pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.18 or, if that assessment was made more than one year prior to the date of title transfer rendering the Parcel taxable, as determined by the assessor at the time of such transfer. 4. Assessed Value; Captured Assessed Value. It is estimated that the Assessed Value of all taxable property in the District, upon completion of the redevelopment thereof by the HRA and the City in accordance with the Plan and the completion of the private redevelopment expected to occur described in Section II -A -3 hereof and termination of the District, will be approximately $9,414,000, and that accordingly the Captured Assessed Value thereof will be $4,995,000. 5. Duration of District. It is estimated that the duration of the District will be not more than twenty -five (25) years from the date of receipt by the HRA of the first Tax Increment form the District. 6. Payment and Discharge of Bonds; Use of Tax Increment. The principal of and interest on the Bonds will be payable solely from the Tax Increments to be received by the HRA with respect to the District, from any special assessments which may be levied against the property benefited by the Parking Facilities or street improvements, and from certain proceeds of the Bonds (capitalized interest) and interest i earnings thereon. At such time as the Bonds have.been paid or discharged in accordance with the Bond Resolution authorizing therein issuance and all other costs of the Project and any additional project undertaken pursuant to this Plan have been paid, the HRA will notify the Hennepin County Director.of Property Taxation of such fact and will direct the Hennepin County Director of Property Taxation thereafter to pay to all local government units having authority to levy taxes.on taxable property in the District including the City, all ad valorem taxes received with respect thereto, in the manner then provided by law. 7. Use of Captured Assessed Value and Tax Increment. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.76, Subdivision 2, the City and the HRA hereby determine that they will use 100% of the Captured Assessed Value of taxable property located in the District, and 1000 of the Tax Increments to be derived from the District, for the entire duration of the District. D. Impact of Tax Increment Financing. It is estimated that the impact of the establishment of the District and the implementation of the Plan and undertaking of the Project will be as follows: The local government units other than the City which are authorized by law to levy ad valorem property taxes and in which the District is located, are Independent School District No. 273, Hennepin County, the HRA, and various metropolitan area authorities, including the Metropolitan Council, the Metropolitan Transit Commission, the Metropolitan Airports Commission and the Metropolitan Mosquito Control-District (the local government units). After the establishment and during the continuance of the District, as a result of the establishment of the Project and the implementation of the Plan and private development in the Project Area, there will be an increase in the Assessed Value of taxable property 'in the District subject to taxation by such local government units. It is estimated that during the-continuance of the District, as a result of the establishment of the Project and the implementation of the Plan and private development in the Project Area, there.will also be an increase in the Assessed Value.of taxable property outside the District but within the City and such local government units. Upon termination of the District there will be a large increase in the Assessed Value of taxable property in the City and such local government units, and thus in the general tax base of the City and all other taxing jursidictions in which the District is located. -10- ,, During the continuance of the District a.portion of the increase in the Assessed Value of taxable property in the District will be subject to taxation by other local government units pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 473F. IV. IMPLEMENTATION OF PROJECT AND PLAN A. In General. The Project and the Plan shall be implemented on behalf of the City and the City Council and the HRA. The HRA or the City shall sell and issue Tax Increment Bonds in the amount needed to finance the Public Redevelopment Cost of the Project,.and shall use so much of the Bond proceeds available to pay the Public Redevelopment Cost as is necessary. B. Cooperation Agreement.. If necessary, the City and the HRA shall enter into a Cooperation Agreement for the purpose of specifying the duties and responsibilities of each with respect to the implementation of the Project and the Plan, and the application of the Tax Increments to be derived from the District. V. AMENDMENTS TO PLAN The City and the HRA reserve the right to alter the Project and amend or modify the Plan by their joint action, subject to the provisions of state law regulating such action. - The City and the HRA specifically reserve the right to increase the size of the District, the Public Redevelopment Cost of the Project and the amount of Bonds to be issued to finance such Cost, by following the procedures specified in Section 273.74, Subdivision 4, if and when it is determined to be necessary for the paying of additional Public Redevelopment Costs. -11- MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING HELD AT EDINA CITY HALL MAY 8, 1989 A special Council Meeting was held on May 8, 1989, at 6:00 p.m. for the purpose of reviewing the draft agenda for the May 15, 1989 Regular Council Meeting concerning citizens against pornography. In attendance were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor Richards. Staff members present were Manager Rosland and Clerk Daehn. Manager Rosland reported that he had-met with the City Attorney, the Prosecuting Attorney, the Chief of Police and the Chairman of the Human Relations Commission and that together they had developed the following recommendations for the Council to consider concerning the pornography issues: 1) That the Legislature be asked to strengthen the Display to Minors Law and that we lobby through the AMM, LMC and the MLC to correct the weaknesses in the law. 2) That we ask the police chiefs' association to watch for a prosecutable obscenity law case and then ask elected city officials to encourage county officials to challenge the Minnesota Obscenity Law in court. 3) That staff work with Shinder's so that the adult material in their store will not be visible to minors and ask that the baseball card counters be moved. The Council also reviewed and discussed a memorandum dated January 19, 1987 from Dorsey & Whitney, legal counsel, regarding Municipal Regulation of Adult Facilities, and also the Minnesota Obscenity Law and the Display to Minors Law. Following discussion, it was informally agreed that the staff's recommendations be presented at the May 15, 1989 Council Meeting at which time the Council would solicit comment from the citizens' group and react to the recommendations. No formal action was taken and no other business was discussed by the Council. The meeting was adjourned at approximately 6:35 p.m. City Clerk MINUTES OF THE CLOSED COUNCIL MEETING HELD AT EDINA CITY HALL JULY 6. 1989 A closed Council Meeting was held on July 6, 1989 at 8:00 a.m. for the purpose of discussing potential litigation concerning issuance of a building permit for Lot 9, White Oaks Second Addition. In attendance were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice and Mayor Richards. Staff members present were Assistant Manager Hughes, Planner Larsen, Engineer Hoffman, Attorney Erickson and Clerk Daehn. Attorney Erickson referred to the June 19, 1989 direction. of the Council to staff to prepare findings which the Council would use to determine whether or not a building permit should be issued for construction of a single family house on Lot 9. He advised the Council of the legal.ramifications of denial of the building permit and explained the legal opinion concerning the issuance or denial of the permit together with alternatives for the Council's consideration. Following discussion the Council confirmed.the action taken on June 19, 1989 to prepare findings in support of denial of a building permit for the subject property and agreed that the City not acquire the property. No other business was discussed by the Council Members. Meeting was adjourned at 9:15 a.m. City. Clerk MINUTES OF THE CLOSED COUNCIL MEETING HELD AT EDINA CITY HALL AUGUST 21, 1989 A closed Council Meeting was held on August 21, 1989 at 5:30 p.m. for the purpose of discussing potential litigation concerning issuance of a building permit for Lot 9, White Oaks Second Addition and Lot 1, White Oaks Third Addition. In attendance.were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor Richards. Staff members present were Manager Rosland, Assistant Manager Hughes, Engineer Hoffman, Attorney Erickson and Clerk Daehn. Attorney Erickson reported that he and Assistant Manager Hughes had met with Connor Schmid and Ed Clausman of the White Oaks neighborhood and Richard Andron of Andron, Inc. concerning the subject lots, at the request of Mr. Andron. They discussed a proposal whereby the City would purchase the subject lots from Mr. Andron with a cash payment and the acceptance by the City of a gift of value of an additional amount. Attorney Erickson explained the position of the City if this matter were to resolved by the courts. The Council Members discussed the proposal and also the process involved and potential costs if the matter proceeded to litigation. Motion was made by Member Smith directing Assistant Manager Hughes and Attorney Erickson to continue to negotiate with Mr. Andron on purchase of the subject lots, with the understanding that any cash payment for purchase of the subject lots would be predicated upon the City receiving donations from the White Oaks neighbors equal to one -half the amount of the cash payment by no later than September 18, 1989. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. No other business was discussed by the Council Members. Meeting was adjourned at 6:00 p.m. City Clerk + MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 18, 1989 ROL CALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice and Smith. Mayor Pro -tem Kelly chaired the meeting in the absence of Mayor Richards. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMLS ADOPTED Motion vas made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Rice to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented with the exception of the removal of item VII.A - Boiler and Machinery Insurance. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly Motion carried. PUBLIC HFARINGS CONDUCTED ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered place on file. Due notice having been given, public hearings were conducted and action taken as hereinafter recorded on the following proposed assessments: 1. PARKING RAMP IMPROVEMENT NO. P -1B - Location: West 51st Street Parking Ramp Manager Rosland presented analysis of assessment showing total construction cost of $240,000 proposed to be assessed against one assessable unit (Edina Theatre property) . Assessment to be spread over 20 years. No objections were heard and no written objections to the proposed assessment were received prior hereto. Assessment approved by motion of Member Rice, seconded by Member Paulus and carried unanimously. (Assessment levied by Resolution later in Minutes.) 2. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -281A Location: Malibu Drive from Lincoln Drive to 655 feet Southeasterly 3. WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -363 Location: Malibu Drive from Lincoln Drive to 710 feet Southeasterly 4. STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. STS -185 Location: Malibu Drive from Lincoln Drive to 290 feet Southeasterly . 5. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -377 Location: Malibu Drive from Lincoln Drive to 710 feet Southeasterly Improvements listed under 2, 3, 4 and 5 affecting the same properties, public hearing was conducted concurrently. Manager Rosland presented analysis of assessment for Street Improvement No. BA -281A showing total construction cost of $23,349.43 proposed to be assessed against 1,052.25 assessable feet at $22.19 per assessable foot, against estimated assessment of $26.35 per assessable foot. Analysis of assessment for Watermain Improvement No. WM -363 was given as total cost of construction of $21,239.15 proposed to be assessed against 5 assessable lots at $4,247.83 per lot; against estimated assessment of $5,773.72 per lot. Analysis of assessment for Storm Sewer Improvement No. STS -185 was given as total cost of construction of $14,955.98 proposed to be assessed against 140,300 assessable square feet at $0.1066 per assessable square foot, against estimated assessment of $0.126 per square foot. Analysis of assessment for Sanitary Sewer Improvement No: SS -377 was given as total cost of construction of $29,700.85 proposed to be assessed against 5 assessable lots at $5,940.17 per lot, against estimated assessment of $7,132.73 per lot. All assessments are to be spread over 10 years per Developer's Agreement. No objections were heard and no written objections to the proposed assessments were received prior hereto. Assessment for Street Improvement No. BA -281A approved by motion of Member Smith, seconded by Member Paulus and carried unanimously. Assessment for Waterman Improvement No. VM -363 approved by motion of Member Rice, seconded by Member Paulus and carried unanimously. Assessment for Storm Sever Improvement No. STS -185 approved by motion of Member Rice, seconded by Member Smith and carried unanimously. Assessment for Sanitary Sever Improvement No. SS -377 approved by motion of Member Paulus, seconded by Member Rice and carried unanimously. (Assessment levied by Resolution later in Minutes.) 6. WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -364 Location: Ryan Avenue from West 62nd Street to West 63rd Street 7. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -378 Location: Ryan Avenue from West 62nd Street to West 63rd Street Improvements listed under 6 and 7 above affecting the same properties, public hearing was conducted concurrently. Manager Rosland presented analysis of assessment for Watermain Improvement No. WM -364 showing total construction cost of $10,514.19 proposed to be assessed against 3 lots at $3,504.73 per assessable lot, against estimated assessment of $4,736.70 per lot. Analysis of assessment for Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS -378 was given as total construction cost of $17,211.24 proposed to be assessed against 3 lots at $5,737.08 per assessable lot, against estimated assessment of $5,666.10 per lot. Assessments to be spread over 10 years. No objections were heard and no written objections to the proposed assessments were received prior hereto. Assessments approved by motion of Member Rice, seconded by Member Paulus and carried unanimously. (Assessment levied by Resolution later in Minutes.) 8. STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. STS -186 Location: Minnesota Drive from France Avenue to Edinborough Way 9. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -379 Location: Minnesota Drive from France Avenue to Edinborough Way 10. WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -365 Location: Minnesota Drive from France Avenue to Edinborough Way Improvements listed under 8, 9 and,10 above affecting the same properties, public hearing was conducted concurrently. Manager Rosland presented analysis of assessment for Storm Sewer Improvement No. STS -186 showing total construction cost of $63,984.94 proposed to be assessed against 2,139,965 square feet at $0.0299 per assessable square foot, against estimated assessment of $0.331 per square foot. Analysis of assessment for Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS -,379 was given as total construction cost of $19,687.68 proposed to be assessed against 2,139,965 square feet at $0.0092 per assessable square foot, against estimated assessment of $0.01093 per square foot. Analysis of assessment for Watermain Improvement No. WM -365 was given as total construction cost of $40,787.72 proposed to be assessed against 2,139,965 square feet at $0.01906 per assessable square foot, against estimated assessment of $0.02116 per square foot. Assessments to be spread over 10 years. Engineer Hoffman explained that this is the first round of assessments for the Centennial Lakes project. No objections were heard and no written objections to the proposed assessments had been received prior hereto. Assessment for Storm Sewer Improvement No. STS -186 approved by motion of Member Paulus, seconded by Member Smith and carried unanimously. Assessment for Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS -379 approved by motion of Member Rice, seconded by Member Smith and carried unanimously. Assessment for Watermain Improvement No. VN -365 approved by motion of Member Rice, seconded by Member Smith and carried unanimously. (Assessments levied by Resolution later in Minutes.) 11. SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION NO. HC -11 Location: 4540 France Avenue South Manager Rosland presented analysis of assessment showing total construction cost of $6,215.00 proposed to be assessed against one lot as petitioned by property owner. Assessment to be spread over 6 years. No objections were heard and no written objections to the proposed assessment were received prior hereto. Assessment approved by motion of Member Rice seconded by Member Paulus and carried unanimously. (Assessment levied by Resolution later in Minutes.) 12. MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. M -89 Location: 50th Street and France Avenue Business District Manager Rosland presented analysis of assessment showing total cost of $43,121.71 proposed to be assessed against 309,560 square feet at $0.1393 per assessable square foot. One year assessment to be paid in 1990. Engineer Hoffman explained that the assessment next year will be increased to provide for ramp maintenance. No objections were heard and no written objections to the proposed assessment were received prior hereto. Assessment.approved by motion of Member Smith, seconded by Member Rice and carried unanimously. (Assessment levied by Resolution later in Minutes.) 13. TREE REMOVAL PROJECT NO. TR -89 Location: 5200 Valley View Road 4810 Brookside Avenue Manager Rosland presented analysis of assessment showing total cost of $804.22 proposed to be assessed against two lots: $155.42 against 5200 Valley View Road, to be spread over 3 years, and $648.80 against 4810 Brookside Avenue, to be spread over 5 years. No objections were heard and no written objections to the proposed assessment had been received prior hereto. Assessment approved by motion of Member Rice, seconded by Member Smith and carried unanimously. (Assessment levied by resolution later in Minutes.) 13. AQUATIC WEED IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ -89 Location: Indianhead Lake and Mill Pond Manager Rosland presented analysis of assessment showing total cost for Indianhead Lake of $10,651.00 proposed to be assessed against 33 homes at $322.76 per home and total cost for Mill Pond of $7,268.00 proposed to be assessed against 63 homes at $115.37 per home. One year assessment to be paid in 1990. No objections were heard and no written objections to the proposed assessment had been received prior hereto. Assessment approved by motion of Member Smith, seconded by Member Rice and carried unanimously. (Assessment levied by Resolution later in Minutes.) 14. TREE TRIMMING IMPROVEMENT NO. TT -89 Location: Area bounded.by Highway 169 on the West, Highway 100 on the East, Highway 62 on the North and the Southern City Boundary on the South Manager'Rosland presented analysis of assessment showing total cost at $43,442.31 proposed to be assessed against 827 trees trimmed at $52:53.per assessable tree. One year assessment to be paid in 1990. A letter from Nancy E. Johnson, 6312 Warren Avenue, objecting to the assessment was acknowledged. Manager Rosland stated that this will be checked by staff and an adjustment will be made if warranted. Staff also will be responding to numerous phone calls that had been received questioning the tree trimming assessment and adjustments will be made if warranted. No objections were heard and no other written objections to the proposed assessment had been received prior hereto. Assessment approved by motion of Member Smith, seconded by Member Rice and carried unanimously. (Assessment levied by Resolution later in Minutes.) 15. RE- ASSESSMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON TAX FORFEITED LAND Location: Land parcel only - Part of Lot 23, Auditor's Subdivision No. 196 (North of Crosstown Highway and east of Vernon Avenue) Manager Rosland presented analysis of assessment showing total amount to be re- assessed of $7,960.49 proposed to be:assessed against one parcel. Assessment to be spread over 3 years. He explained that this property was formerly owned by Edina Masonic Lodge No. 343 and that assessments were levied in 1982 for public improvements (grading, street, sanitary sewer and watermain). It became tax forfeited land several years ago and has now been purchased from the county. The City will be rebated for 90% ($44,100.00) of the sale price paid ($52.060.49) towards the special assessments, leaving a total of $7,960.49 to be re- assessed. The property owner has been advised of the proposed re- assessment. No objection was heard and no written objection to the proposed re- assessment had been received prior hereto. Assessment approved by motion of Member Smith, seconded by Member Rice and carried unanimously. (Assessment levied by Resolution later in Minutes.) Following the presentation of analysis of assessments and approval, Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED ON ACCOUNT OF VARIOUS.PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City has given notice of hearings as required by law on the proposed assessment rolls for the improvements hereinafter referred to, and at such hearings held on September 18, 1989, has considered all oral and written objections presented against the levy of such assessments. 2. Each of the assessments as set forth in the assessment rolls on file in the office of the City Clerk for the following improvements: Parking Ramp Improvement No. P -1B Street Improvement No. BA -281A Watermain Improvement No. WM -363 Storm Sewer Improvement No. STS -185 Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS -377 Watermain Improvement No. WN -364 Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS -378 Storm Sewer Improvement No. STS -186 Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS -379 Watermain Improvement No. WN -365 Sanitary Sewer Connection No. HC -11 Maintenance Improvement No. M -89 Tree Removal Improvement No. TR -89 Aquatic Weeds Improvement No. AQ -89 Tree Trimming Improvement No. TT -89 Re- assessment of Special Assessments on Tax Forfeited Land (Part of Lot 23, Auditor's Subdivision No. 196 does not exceed the local benefits conferred by said improvements upon the lot, tract or parcel of land so assessed, and all of said assessments are hereby adopted and confirmed as the proper assessments on account of said respective improvements to be spread against the benefitted lots, parcels and tracts of land described therein. 3. The assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments, the first of said installments, together with interest at a rate of 9.0% per annum, except that interest for Re- assessment of Special Assessments on Tax Forfeited Land (Part of Lot 23, Auditor's Subdivision No. 196) shall be at a rate of 11.5% per annum, on the entire assessment from the date hereof to December 31, 1990, to be payable with the general taxes for the year 1990. To each subsequent installment shall be added interest at the above rate for one year on all then unpaid installments. The number of such annual installments shall be as follows: Name of Improvement Number of Installments PARKING RAMP IMPROVEMENT NO. P -1B (Levy No. 11541) 20 years STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -281A (Levy No. 11540) 10 years WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -363 (Levy No. 11534) 10 years STORM'SEVER IMPROVEMENT NO. STS -185 (Levy No. 11538) 10 years SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -377 (Levy No. 11536) 10 years WATERxATN IMPROVEMENT NO. WN -364 (Levy No. 11535) 10 years SANITARY SEVER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -378 (Levy No. 11537) 10 years STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. STS -186 (Levy No. 11539 10 years SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -379 (Levy No. 11559) 10 years WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -365 (Levy No. 11558) 10 years SANITARY SEWER HOUSE CONNECTION NO. HC -11 (Levy No. 11533) 6 years MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. M -89 (Levy No. 11527) 1 year TREE REMOVAL PROJECT NO. TR -89 (Levy No. 11531) 3 years (Levy No. 11532) 5 years AQUATIC WEED IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ -89 (Levy No. 11530) 1 year TREE TRIMMING IMPROVEMENT NO. TT -89 (Levy No. 11551) 1 year TAX FORFEIT LAND RE- ASSESSMENT (Part of Lot 23,.Auditor's 3 years Subdivision No. 196 (06- 116 -21 -21 -0006) (Levy No. 11585) 4. The City Clerk shall forthwith prepare and transmit to the County Auditor a copy of this resolution and a certified duplicate of said assessments with each .then unpaid installment and interest set forth separately, to be extended on the tax lists of the County in accordance with this resolution. 5. The City Clerk shall also mail notice of any special assessment which may be payable by a county, by a political subdivision, or by the owner of any right -of -way as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.061, Subdivision 4, and if any such assessment is not paid in a single installment, the City Treasurer shall arrange for collection thereof in installments, as set forth in said Section. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Rice. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly Resolution adopted. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVED FOR GRACE CHURCH OF EDINA Planner Craig Larsen recalled that the request of Grace Church of Edina, 5300 France Avenue, for a conditional use permit was heard by the Council on July 24, 1989 and the hearing was continued to allow the church time to address concerns that were raised at that meeting. Specifically, the following were identified: 1) If there was to be a modification to the front entrance of the building, exactly what would that be, how would it look and what kind of variance would be requested, 2) Noise - generated by the heating /air conditioning unit located on the roof of the building, and 3) Drainage spilling off of the church property onto the backyards of some of the Halifax Avenue properties. Planner Larsen advised that since then the church did appear before the Board of Appeals and requested a 15 foot setback variance to build a new front entry that would draw the entry back to the existing line of the church building or a 35 foot setback. As initially proposed the new entry would only have had a 2 foot setback. This would comply with what the Planning Commission had indicated would be acceptable. The Board of Appeals unanimously approved the 15 foot setback variance for the redesigned entry at their meeting of September 7, 1989._;: The existing cross and supports to the south of the proposed new entry would be- lowered to the building line at that point. The church has proposed installation of sound baffles on the heating /air conditioning unit located on the roof to reduce the level of sound coming from the unit. Finally, with regard to the drainage problem, the church has installed a new "beehive" type cover for the catch basin which would allow for better drainage. In addition, the church is proposing berming along the low area adjacent to the Thatcher's property which would contain the stormwater runoff on the church site for drainage into the catch basin. Planner Larsen said that church representatives had met with the neighbors who had been concerned about the noise and drainage and had explained the proposed remedies. Staff would recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit for Grace Church to allow for the proposed expansion and remodeling, subject to immediate installation of berming along the west property line, installation of sound baffles on the heating /air conditioning unit, review and approval by the City Engineer of any further changes in the grading plan and also conditioned upon receipt of an executed Proof of Parking Agreement prior to issuance of a building permit for the expansion and remodeling. Member Smith noted that the proposed actions by Grace Church had been outlined in a letter from Andre LaTondresse, Schwarz/Weber Architects, Inc., and said he would like to hear from representatives of the church on these issues. Richard Lundborg, Chairman of Facilities Task Force for Grace Church, then reiterated the background information on their original master plan that had called for a sanctuary that would seat_1800 people. He explained that the sanctuary that was built was to be a temporary, low cost facility until they could build the larger one. Because that master plan is no longer valid, Grace Church is requesting a conditional use permit for building expansion and remodeling to make this their permanent facility. The expansion and remodeling will improve the facility both as to function and visibility. Mr. Lundborg stated that, as good neighbors, Grace Church intends to install the sound baffles on the heating /air conditioning unit and to construct the berming regardless of whether or not the conditional use permit is approved. Member Rice asked how high the proposed new entry tower would be compared with the existing cross to the south, and if any part would be closer to the street than the 35 foot setback. In response to the height of the entry tower, Andre Latondresse, architect for the project, said that the tip of the steeple would be 44 feet from ground level. The existing cross is at a height-of 65 feet which will be lowered so that there will be a recognizable steeple. Planner Larsen confirmed that the new front entry-vestibule would maintain the 35 setback for the existing building. Mary Thatcher, 5309 Halifax Avenue, thanked the Council for its interest in supporting her concern about the drainage from the church site onto her property. She said that, from the plans shown her by the church and comments of City staff, she feels assured that they will not have drainage from routine rainstorms in the future. Further, she said the proposed improvements to the building look, promising. Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved adoption, subject to 1) Immediate installation of berming along the west property line, 2) Immediate installation of sound baffles on the heating /air conditioning unit, 3) Review and approval by City Engineer of any further changes in the grading plan, and 4) Receipt of an executed Proof of Parking Agreement prior to issuance of a building permit for the expansion and remodeling: RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR GRACE CHURCH OF EDINA WHEREAS, the procedural requirements of Ordinance No. 825 (The Zoning Ordinance) have been met; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the Findings as required by Ordinance No. 825 have been satisfied; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby grants a Conditional Use Permit to Grace Church of Edina, 5300 France Avenue, for building expansion and remodeling. Motion for adoption of the resolution -was seconded by Member Rice. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly Resolution adopted. RELEASE_ OF PROOF OF PARKING AGREEMENTS APPROVED FOR ONE CORPORATE CENTER. PHASES 5 AND 6 Planner Larsen presented the request of Ryan Construction Company for release of Proof of Parking Agreements for One Corporate Center, Phases 5 and 6, generally located east of Ohms Lane and west of Metro Boulevard. The subject property measures 12.8 acres and is developed with 14 office buildings containing 280,319 square feet of floor area. The project was developed by Ryan Construction Company in 1982 and required numerous variances because at the time the City did not have a Planned Office District in the Zoning Ordinance. One of the variances granted was for parking quantity. The development required 724 spaces, but the developer proposed constructing 642 spaces. The plan was approved at 642 spaces with a Proof of Parking agreement illustrating the required 724 spaces. Planner Larsen explained that in 1984 the City adopted a new Zoning Ordinance which reduced parking requirements for larger office building developments. Under the new Zoning Ordinance 632 spaces would be required for this development. A recent as -built survey indicated that the development has 645 spaces, or 13 spaces more than currently required. In an effort to simplify the sale and financing of the properties, Ryan has asked the City to release the Proof of Parking Agreements. Staff would support the release of the Proof of Parking Agreements. The development as constructed exceeds current parking requirements. Staff has not observed or received complaints of parking shortages. In addition, it appears that the City would not be able to legally require the construction of parking in excess'of current ordinance requirements. Planner Larsen advised that the request was considered by the Community Development and Planning Commission at its meeting of August 30, 1989, and the Commission unanimously recommended release of the Proof of Parking Agreements. Member Smith introduced the following resolutions and moved their adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Ryan Construction Company of Minnesota, Inc., a Minnesota corporation ( "Owner "), and the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City "), have entered into an Agreement (Conditions to Parking Variance) dated the 24th day of December, 1980, and filed as Document No. 4615750 in the Office of Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Agreement encumbered the real property legally described therein, known as One Corporate Center Phase 5; and WHEREAS, the Owner of the subject property has petitioned the City of Edina to release the encumbrance of said Agreement; WHEREAS, the City hereby agrees to remove the encumbrance of said Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the Mayor and Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute a document releasing the instrument described herein as Conditions to Parking Variance for One Corporate Center. Phase 5. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Ryan Construction Company of Minnesota, Inc., a Minnesota corporation ( "Owner "), and the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City "), have enter into an AGreement (Conditions to Parking Variance) dated the 20th day of October, 1981, and filed as Document No. 4680132 in the Office of Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Agreement encumbered the real property legally described therein, known as One Corporate Center Phase 6; and WHEREAS, the Owner of the subject property has petitioned the City of Edina to release the encumbrance of said Agreement; WHEREAS, the City hereby agrees to remove the encumbrance of said Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED.by the Edina City Council that the Mayor and Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute .a document releasing the instrument described herein as Conditions to Parking Variance for One Corporate Center Phase 6. Motion for adoption of the resolutions was seconded by Member Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly Resolutions adopted. *HEARING DATE OF 10/2189 SET FOR PLANNING MATTERS Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Rice setting October 2, 1989 as hearing date for the following Planning matters: 1) Amendment to Final Development Plan, Edinborough - Hawthorn Edina, Inc. - Generally located north and east of Edinborough Way and west of York Avenue. 2) Amendment to Ordinance No. 825 - To Add a Hotel as a Permitted Use in the MDD -5 District. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. *VACATION GRANTED FOR SCRIVER ROAD RIGHT OF WAY - LOTS 1 AND 2. BLOCK 1. HYLAND ACRES - (5101 SCRIVER ROAD) Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Pursuant to due notice given, a public hearing was conducted on the request for vacation of a portion of right of way for Scriver Road. No public comment or objection was heard. Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION VACATING EASEMENT FOR STREET PURPOSES WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council, adopted the 21st day of August, 1989, fixed a date for a public hearing on a proposed vacation of a portion of Scriver Road right of way; WHEREAS, two weeks' published and posted notice of said hearing was given and the hearing was held on the 18th day of September, 1989, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the public that said street vacation be made; and WHEREAS, the Council has considered the extent to which the vacation affects existing easements within the area of the vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric, cable television or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon such street or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, that the following described portion of street right of way be and is hereby vacated effective as of September 19, 1989: That part of SCRIVER ROAD lying northerly of the following described line: Beginning'at the southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1, HYIAND ACRES, according to the recorded plat thereof; thence North 88 degrees 38 minutes 15 seconds East along the south line of said Lot 1 and its easterly extension a distance of 51.67 feet; thence 67.92 feet along a curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 64.43 feet and a central angle of 60 degrees 23 minutes 45 seconds, to a point on the southwesterly line of Lot 2, said Block 1, distant 31.04 feet northwesterly from the most southerly corner of said Lot 2 and said line there terminating. The City of Edina reserves in favor of itself a utility easement within said described vacated street right of way for the maintenance, replacement, repair and removal of, and for otherwise attending to, underground storm sewer as deemed necessary by the City of Edina. The Clerk is authorized and directed to cause a notice of completion of proceedings to be prepared, entered in the transfer record of the County Auditor, and filed with the County Recorder in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS AT 6509 AND 6517 INDIAN HILLS ROAD HEARD REGARDING ASSESSMENT FOR TREE TRIMMING IMPROVEMENT NO. TT -89 Greg Buck stated that he was appearing for Gordon and Clarette Peterson, 6517 Indian Hills Road and also for Donald and Mary Buck, 6509 Indian Hills Road regarding their proposed assessment for Tree Trimming Improvement No. TT -89 heard earlier in the meeting. He said that he.had arrived after that assessment was-approved. Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly asked the Park and Recreation Director to contact these residents to identify the tree trimming that was done and to determine the assessment against their properties. BOILER AND MACHINERY INSURANCE BID AWARDED Member Smith said that he had asked that the award for boiler and machinery insurance be removed from the consent agenda because he was concerned that only one quotation had been received. He suggested that the City would receive a broader base of bids if all insurance for the City were bid together on an annual basis. Following some discussion, Member Smith made a motion to approve award of bid for boiler and machinery insurance to sole bidder, Hartford Steam Boiler Insurance, at $7,957.00. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly Motion carried. *BID AWARDED FOR SNOW PLOY AND WING FOR LOADER Notion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for snow plow and wing for loader to recommended low bidder, LaHass Manufacturing A Sales, at $9,769.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR SERVICE BODY FOR EIECTRICAL SERVICE TRUCK Notion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for service body for electrical service truck to recommended low bidder, LaHass Manufacturing A Sales, at $7,177.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF 9/12/89 APPROVED Member Smith moved approval of the following recommended action listed in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of September 12, 1989: 1) To place "NO PARKING - BUS STOP" signs on the west side of Xerxes Avenue at West 57th Street, 2) To install "NO PARKING" signs on the west side of Xerxes Avenue south of West 69th Street to the parking lot entrance'of Community Credit Building, 3) To install "NO PARKING ANY TIME" signs on the vest side of McCauley ,Trail South, north of Sioux Trail, and on the north side of McCauley Trail West, 4) To place "STOP" signs on Country Club Road at Moorland Avenue also at Edina Boulevard, and that the crosswalk be enhanced at this location, and to acknowledge Sections B and C of the Minutes. Motion for approval was seconded by Member Paulus. Ayes: Paulus, Smith, Kelly Motion carried. (Member Rice was absent for vote on the motion.) STATUS REPORT GIVEN ON WHITE OAKS LOTS: PURCHASE AGREEMENT SIGNED Assistant Manager Gordon Hughes said he was happy to report that the City has signed a Purchase Agreement with Andron, Inc. in the amount of $40,000 for Lot 9, White Oaks Second Addition and Lot 1, White Oaks Third Addition. Also, that pledges totaling $20,000 have been presented from the White Oaks Improvement Association and other area residents to meet the contingency requested by the City Council. He said the closing on the property is scheduled for October 9, 1989. Connor Schmid, 4711 Meadow Road, Secretary /Treasurer of the White Oaks Improvement Association, spoke on behalf of 19 residents from the area who he said had felt they would meet the goal for pledges and now have met it. He said they were present to thank the members of the staff who had worked on this during the various stages. They also wanted to express their appreciation and thanks to the Council for its sensitivity, concern and forthright position in looking at the many public and private issues that were raised concerning the property. Member Smith asked who will own the property and how it is proposed to be maintained. Assistant Manager Hughes said it would be owned by the City of Edina and is to be left as it is now for open space. He said the only open issue would be the conservation restrictions on some of the lots to the north. Mr. Schmid commented that the representation was made to the people who contributed that this was for the preservation of the marsh and that it would be a permanent situation, that it would not be developed, e.g. municipal swimming pool tennis court or playground. He said that, because there was a 50% participation by the residents of the area in the acquisition, he hoped the City would take steps to see that that status was permanently maintained. ANIMAL CONTROL POLICY ON RACCOONS DISCUSSED: CONCERNS VOICED REGARDING DEER: DREHF.R LETTER REGARDING ORDINANCE NO. 312 (ANIMAL CONTROL) NOTED Raccoons - Chief Craig Swanson stated that the current Edina Animal Control policy regarding raccoons provides for active trapping and disposition of the animal when 1) it is inside a home, 2) when it is determined to be sick or injured, or 3) when it is involved in bites. In other cases, homeowners are advised of steps they can take to deal with raccoons. He explained that the rationale for this policy comes from both a legal and workload basis. State law allows that only a homeowner can remove protected animals that are doing damage. The City could apply for a permit from the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) allowing for transport and destruction of raccoons for residents. The City of Minnetonka has recently done this with the expectation of increased raccoon complaints. Many other cities have a similar policy to that of Edina. Secondly, the resources necessary to deal with even the number of current calls is beyond present allocations. Traps, persons to set and monitor them, and the time necessary to dispose of the animals would be a significant change in service level. Lastly, many people consider raccoons a part of urban wildlife that should not be tampered with. Chief Swanson recommended that the current policy be maintained. If it were to change to a more aggressive trapping program, the current animal control emphasis on dog and cat protection would be eroded. Mayor Pro -tem Kelly asked if the Minnetonka residents are assessed for this service and if Edina could charge for this type of service. Chief Swanson said he did not think they were; however, the City of Minnetonka has set a limit of three animals per household annually that they will trap. Attorney Erickson said that the City could establish a charge for the service. Manager Rosland commented, if the Council decided to do active trapping, that the best approach would be to manage the program through the Police Department but then contract with professional trappers for times when needed the most. Member Paulus said that, unless we are getting a flood of calls about raccoons, she would support the present policy - that the more government is kept out of things it is more positive than government intervention. _ Member Rice said he concurred but that we should keep looking at this. He said he believed that the DNR has taken away the protected status for raccoons in Hennepin County. Also, the summation of raccoon related calls for service was helpful as he had been concerned about bites, which were reported at less than 1 %. Jean Lowe, 6301 Loch Moor Drive, said she was basically present to discuss the, deer problem. However, she said that they have an enormous problem with raccoons and that raccoons that have been trapped are released in the Braemar Park area. She said they have to fend them off of their deck, their fighting awakens them, bird feeders must be secured, etc. Mrs. Lowe said she felt the City's policy has to be seriously looked at and that active trapping should be done at least in their area. Member Paulus responded that there is nothing to prevent the individual resident from trapping raccoons or hiring someone to do that job. If the City were surveyed, we would find that people along Minnehaha Creek have the same problem. It becomes a philosophical question of who was here first, and if.we want the beauty of green landscaping the question is how far should the City go in controlling wildlife. As to trapping in certain areas, she said she felt the policy should apply over all and that it would be difficult to provide trapping in a particular segment. Chief Swanson clarified that for the last ten years all animals that have been trapped or caught have been released in the Minnesota River Valley and not in the Braemar area. Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly suggested that staff should report to the Council in the next few months as to what is happening and how many calls the City is receiving concerning raccoons. She said she was amazed that staff is receiving approximately 50 -60 calls per month and that was of concern to her. Deer - Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly said she had received a call from Mrs. Margaret Good, 6308 Loch Moor Drive, concerning deer and had asked her to write a letter to the City which was done. In response, some research material had been sent to her by Assistant Manager Hughes. Over the years, Mrs. Jean Lowe, 6301 Loch Moor Drive, has also spoken about the same issue. Raymond Good, 6308 Loch Moor Drive, said that they have four concerns: 1) Property damage, 2) Deer trail across back yard, 3) Emotional trauma of facing large animals in the yard, and 4) Health hazard of Lyme disease. He said that, based on their observations over the past 12 years that they have lived there, they had no deer problem until the Braemar Park Golf Course expansion. Their conclusion is that the deer have been chased out of the park through this construction, have ended up in their back woods and they now have as many as seven deer in their back yard within 50 feet from their deck.' The deer are in their driveway when they come home at night and they walk down the street in clusters. Mr. Good concluded that he felt it.will not get better - they would like the problem to disappear but they do not think it will. He said they would appreciate the City addressing their concerns. Jean Lowe, 6301 Loch Moor Drive, said she has approached the Council before on the "deer problem and has also talked with the DNR and the Hennepin County Park system. She said the deer herd is growing rapidly - three years ago she counted 12 in her back yard. Now they are spreading out and have crossed over the street. Anything they want to grow in their yard they have to mask with chicken wire. They have lost three trees and a lot of shrubs. She said that when Lyme disease hits it will be a catastrophe. Mrs. Lowe pointed out that the City has its largest recreational complex in the Braemar area and this needs to be addressed. The deer are the host for the tick and will bring it in. She said that golfers, baseball players and soccer players will be subject to exposure to the ticks which are being found in grasses. She also said that the deer will be hit by vehicles and someone will be seriously injured. She concluded by saying that the resident herd must be addressed and the problem must also be worked on with Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Hennepin County Park system and the DNR. She said one of the ways would be for the Council to put pressure on the Hennepin County Park system and the DNR. Larry Cerf, 6312 Loch Moor Drive, said that, basically, he liked deer and that they were an amusement at first. However, he said they now have a six month old daughter and they are concerned about the raccoons and deer. He said he was also concerned about doing yard work because of exposure to Lyme disease. Last year his brother killed a deer with his car by Braemar Park and he felt it is getting to the point where something should be done. Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly asked Manager Rosland to speak to the question of construction at Braemar and its effect on the deer. Manager Rosland said that a herd has existed in Edina for a long time and that they move up and down the corridor to Bredesen Park. He said he believed that nothing at Braemar has changed that pattern, and that the deer move where there is food. Assistant Manager Hughes said that as the years go by natural habitat becomes less and less and the deer are more apparent as they begin to encroach on other areas. They are a very adaptable animal - similar to geese, ducks and raccoons - and adapt very well to human population and thrive on food sources in back yards. He said this is a multi -city problem and a multi - jurisdiction problem. Edina's deer are part of a herd that extends down through Tierney Woods, Anderson Lakes Park, Hyland Park Reserve and down to the Minnesota River Valley. Much of that river valley is now part of a federal refuge and an attempt is being made to manage that for animals that might be somewhat in conflict with deer such as waterfowl, etc. They are trying to get certain types of vegetation started and have not been successful because the deer eat it as fast as it starts to sprout. So the big interest at this point is controlling the deer herd in the Minnesota River Valley. To that end, Assistant Manager Hughes said a task force has been established and that a resident of Edina, Arden Aanestad, serves on that task force by virtue of other affiliations. While a deer hunting season will be held this year in the Minnesota River Valley it will not extend up into Bloomington and the Hyland Park Reserve and Anderson Lakes area which is the source of much of the deer that find their way up across I -494 into Edina. He said that deer counts made in 1988 did not spot deer in Edina. Since then 1989 counts show an increase of 20% in the herd. Everyone agrees that there is a population problem with deer in this area and that some control measures are needed. Given that fact, it is difficult to come up with control measures that will start to have an impact on the Edina situation. Assistant Manager Hughes pointed out that something the City can do is to adopt a resolution and go on record with the Commissioner of the DNR, who is now an Edina resident, and express our concern that we have asked to play a more active role in the task force. He said the Hennepin Park Reserve would very much like to see a hunting season extend up into lands they control and probably the DNR does as well. Some of the cities like Bloomington and others may have difficulty in coming to that same conclusion. Perhaps that sort of comment passed on to other cities, e.g. Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Burnsville, etc., would be helpful. He concluded by saying that there is no doubt that the deer are a problem - however, the control measures are difficult to come up with. The Council Members then discussed various possible ways to address the deer problem. These included considering some type of fence or barrier that could be installed south of the residential areas that have the deer problem, concerned residents initiating a "grass roots" letter writing campaign to officials of the DNR, Hennepin Park Reserve, etc., looking at an ordinance to prohibit feeding wild life, establishing a task force of Edina residents to take the problem to the DNR and press for some kind of control, and having the concerned residents work with the existing task force. Manager Rosland said he felt that the DNR has to come to the reality that the urban areas are being overrun with deer and that an open hunting or archery season must be held each year in the Hyland Park Reserve and in the Minnesota River Valley to control the deer from those sources. Following further discussion, Manager Rosland commented that the Commissioner of the DNR, Joseph Alexander, is now an Edina resident and that with the Council's backing he would try to get an appointment with Commissioner Alexander to discuss the best way to approach the problem. Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly said she felt that would be a good idea. Member Smith commented that he still felt Edina should try to become a part of the existing task force. It was informally agreed by the Council Members that they would support Manager Rosland's suggestion that he meet with Commissioner Alexander and then report back to the Council on the outcome. Dreher Letter Concerning Ordinance No. 312 (Animal Control) - Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly referred to the letter from Roger H. Dreher, 1 Spur Road, concerning citations for violation of Ordinance No. 312, section 29j for having a dog which disturbed the peace and quiet of someone. Mr. Dreher had proposed that the Council amend the wording of the ordinance to require the complaining party to notify the owner in writing of the disturbance and disclose their name and address. -Alternatively the animal control officer should be required to disclose the name and address of the complaining party on a warning of violation. A reasonable waiting period should be required in either instance before a citation could be issued. Mr. Dreher stated he believed such a change would encourage the complaining party and the animal owner to discuss the situation and work out a solution. The police would need to become involved only if an effective solution were not achieved. Mr. Dreher had also suggested that owners of previously licensed animals should be notified by mail of the need to renew, with directions and necessary forms enclosed to complete the process by mail. Manager Rosland said that it has been the policy of the City not to give out the name of a complainant concerning a violation and that he believed the Data Privacy Act precluded the release of the name. He also commented that this kind of problem usually cannot be resolved between neighbors. Chief Craig Swanson was asked to explain the procedure for complaints concerning barking dogs. He explained that upon receiving a complaint the animal control officer would respond to the scene, make an observation and issue a citation if there was a violation. However, only a warning is generally given to the dog owner on first complaint. He will also report back to the complainant if possible. Chief Swanson said that the complainant's name is protected under,the Data Privacy Act. Following additional discussion on the suggestion made by Mr. Dreher regarding mailing out renewal notices, Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly asked Chief Swanson to respond to Mr. Dreher by letter advising him of the procedure followed and the interpretation of the Data Privacy Act as to revealing names of complainants. Also that the Council had discussed the suggestion concerning renewal notices and had felt it would be costly and would not be effective. COUNCIL ENDORSES ETHNIC DINNER TO.BE HELD 1121/90 Doris Barman, said she was appearing on behalf of the Human Relations Commission and at the suggestion of Mayor Richards to explain the Ethnic Dinner proposed to be held on January 21, 1990: Mayor Richards had said he would support the project. Mrs. Barman explained that as a step toward their goal of reaching out in order to promote understanding of each other, the Commission would like to sponsor an Ethnic Dinner to celebrate the diversity and cultural heritage within the Edina community. The Commission will be asking the Edina School District to join with the City Council to endorse and co- sponsor the event. If approved, Braemar Clubhouse and Edinborough are both being considered as potential sites for the celebration. Elected officials will be asked to join the Commission in serving as hosts. Manager Rosland cautioned that foods served in a public setting could not be brought in but must be prepared in a licensed kitchen. He suggested that the committee work with the Health Department staff concerning the food arrangements. Member Rice made a motion that the Council endorse and approve the Human Relations Commission's Ethnic Dinner proposed to be held on January 21, 1990 and that the Commission work with staff on the food arrangements. Motion was seconded by z Member Paulus who commented that she was endorsing this with the understanding that the dinner would be public. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly Motion carried. JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH BLOOMINGTON REGARDING MINNESOTA DRIVE APPROVED Engineer Hoffman reviewed the history of the proposed joint powers agreement with Bloomington regarding West 77th Street, now named Minnesota Drive. He recalled that the roadway, which is a border street between Edina and Bloomington, was constructed by the City of Bloomington in connection with the Homart project. The road construction also included installation of storm sewer for a total cost of $800,000 for which Edina's share normally would have been one -half. In 1987 staff from Bloomington, Edina and National Car Rental developed a joint power's agreement in which Edina would pay no portion of the cost of the roadway and National Car Rental would agree to pay 23% of all costs, not to exceed $200,000. The portion to be paid by National would be in the form of a special assessment to be levied by the City of Edina and paid over a period of 10 years. However, National was unwilling to complete the negotiations at that time until a determination was made on costs for construction of West 77 1/2 Street (link road connecting Minnesota Drive with West 77th Street). Construction of the link road was one of the requirements as part of the Indirect Source Permit from the PCA on the Centennial Lakes project. National's position concerning the link road was that, based on the joint powers agreement wherein they agreed to pay for a portion of the costs of- the construction of Minnesota Drive, the City of Edina would be responsible for all costs associated with the construction of the link road. National has strongly desired construction of this roadway in order to prevent the use of their parking lot as a public thoroughfare thereby creating a traffic hazard for their employees. Also, National feels that the benefit of the link road will be to those properties to the west. Engineer Hoffman pointed out that if the City did not use state aid funding and were to assess National for construction of the link road it would result in an assessment of $16,160.00 based on $40.00 per lineal foot. However, it would be a rear yard assessment and require only a one -third rate which would result in an assessment of only $5,386.00 for National. Additionally, the construction would render a triangle of land west of the new road (3,900 square feet) useless to National., In summary, plans have been drawn for construction of the link road, most of the necessary'right of way has been obtained, and the City could exchange right of way with National at no cost to one another. In order to proceed with construction of the link road, staff would recommend that the Council approve the joint powers agreement with the City of Bloomington and authorize the mayor and manager to sign the agreement when completed. Member Smith asked what the cost will be, if state aid funds are available to pay for the link road, and why it is needed. Engineer Hoffman stated that the proposed roadway is on the City's state aid system to be funded that way. Final plans have not been submitted to the state for approval because of the delay in executing the joint powers agreement'. Because of the soil conditions (peat), cost is estimated at $700,000, which would include,right of way costs. He said that the primary reason for building the link road is that it is on the City's master traffic plan. Also, this is one of the four items the City was required to build to meet traffic projections as part of the EIS on the Centennial Lakes project. Member Paulus introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that it hereby approves the Joint Powers Agreement (Agreement for Division of Cost of Construction and Maintenance of Street and Storm Sewer) between the City of Bloomington and the City of Edina with regard to Best 77th Street, known as Minnesota Drive; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and Manager are authorized and directed to execute said Joint Powers Agreement on behalf of the City of Edina. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Smith. Member Rice commented that he was in favor of the link road but that he felt properties to the west and south would be benefitted tremendously. Engineer Hoffman said that would be considered as part of the right of way negotiations. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith Nays: Kelly Resolution adopted. DECISION ON BERENBERG LAWSUIT REPORTED Planner Craig Larsen reported that Judge Montgomery has granted the City's motion for Summary Judgement and has dismissed the lawsuit brought by the Berenbergs relating to their proposed subdivision. At this time it is not known if the decision will be appealed. He said if it is appealed it will most likely happen within 30 days. No action was taken. *CDBG THIRD PARTY FUNDING AGREEMENTS APPROVED Notion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that it hereby approves CDGB Third Party Agreements between the City of Edina and the following providers: South Hennepin Services Council for the H.O.M.E. Program, Greater Minneapolis Day Cate Association for daycare subsidies, and Independent School District No. 273 for handicapped improvements to the Edina Community Center; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreements on behalf of the City of Edina. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. UPDATE GIVEN ON TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE Planner Craig Larsen recalled that the Council's 1989 -1990 Work Program includes-development of a Travel Demand Management (TDM) ordinance and calls for a progress report in September. Planner Larsen reported -that the I -494 Joint Powers Organization (JPO) has initiated the process for developing a TDM Ordinance which would apply uniformly to all communities in the I -494 Corridor. He presented a list of the specific goals of the model ordinance and timetable for development of a model ordinance which is scheduled to be presented to the five city councils in February of 1990. ALISON FUHR SUPPORTED FOR NOMINATION TO CASH BOARD Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly said that she had been contacted by Alison Fuhr concerning her reappointment to the Community Action for Suburban Hennepin (CASH) as a representative from Edina for the private sector. South Hennepin Human Services Council (SHHSC) has already supported the nomination of someone else. Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly suggested that a letter on behalf of the Council be sent in support of her reappointment to the CASH Board. Notion of Member Smith was seconded by Member Rice directing staff to send a letter on behalf of the Council in support of the reappointment of Alison Fuhr to the CASH Board. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly Motion carried. RON CLARK LETTER REGARDING SINGLE FAMILY MORATORIUM DISCUSSED Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly referred to the letter dated August 31, 1989 from Ron Clark, Ron Clark Construction, Inc., concerning the moratorium on single family subdivisions. Mr. Clark has asked the City to terminate the moratorium by adopting regulations deemed appropriate and necessary to control future single family subdivision,.or if further study is required, to consider the exemption of the Wooddale Montessori Redevelopment based on the fact that this site proposal may be distinctly different from others which precipitated the need for the moratorium. Planner.Larsen advised that the final draft ordinance was before the Community Development and Planning Commission last month but the Commission did not act on it. Some minor changes have been made and staff will submit what they believe to be the final draft ordinance to the Planning Commission at its meeting on September 17, 1989. The proposed date that this would be heard by the Council would be the second meeting in October and conceivably it could be acted upon at that meeting. He said that the final draft should be ready by the end of the week when it will be sent to the Council Members as well as the Planning Commission. Planner Larsen said he would not recommend that Wooddale Montessori Redevelopment be exempted from the moratorium and that it should apply uniformly to all single family subdivisions until there is a resolution to the draft ordinance. It was informally agreed by the Council Members to support the recommendation and that Planner Larsen should respond to the letter advising Mr. Ryan of the discussion held. *PETITION FOR PERMANENT STREET SURFACING FOR LINCOLN DRIVE REFERRED TO ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FOR PROCESSING Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Rice to refer the petition dated September 7, 1989 for permanent street surfacing and curb for Lincoln Drive to the Engineering Department for processing. - Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. SOLID FENCES IN FRONT YARDS DISCUSSED Member Rice commented that, following the discussion at the last meeting on the fence height variance, he felt that no solid fences of any height should be allowed in the front yard. He said according to the ordinance a fence up to 4 feet could be built and that he would not like to see any solid fences in front yards. He suggested that this be discussed by the Planning Commission. Member Paulus suggested that the Commission also consider if it would be valuable to require a survey when applying for a permit before a fence could be erected. Planner Larsen pointed out that permits are not required for most fences. CONCERN EXPRESSED ABOUT SPEEDING OF GARBAGE TRUCKS Member Rice said he had observed garbage trucks who were apparently exceeding the speed limit. He said he felt these trucks were operating dangerously and asked that any citations issued to those companies be taken into consideration when licenses are up for renewal.. QUESTION RAISED CONCERNING PARKING ON INTERLACHEN BOULEVARD Member Rice noted that there have been many cars parked on both sides of Interlachen Boulevard by people who are inspecting the one million dollar Parade of Homes house off Interlachen Boulevard. He asked if this parking is allowed. Chief Swanson responded that there are no parking restrictions on Interlachen Boulevard with the exception of fire hydrants and near to corner locations. LETTER TO BE SENT TO HOLIDAY STATIONS CONCERNING LANDSCAPING Member Rice asked if a letter had been sent to the Holiday Stations congratulating them on their landscaping. Park Director Kojetin said he had discussed with the Garden Council some type of award that could be given for commercial landscaping. Member Rice asked that in the meantime a letter be sent. PROCESS FOR PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO SUBDIVISION AND ZONING ORDINANCES DISCUSSED Member Smith said that he was concerned about getting the draft amendments to the Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances for single family subdivisions prior to the public hearing so that he would have time to study and think about them. He also said he felt they should be explained before the public hearing. Manager Rosland cautioned that this be done at the hearing and said that the Council controls the process and is not required to take action until they are comfortable with the provisions of the proposed amendments. Member Rice said he would appreciate that the draft amendments be marked to show the old and new language therein. Further, because this is so important, he said the Council should take the needed time to debate them and that no date should be promised as to when these may be adopted. Manager Rosland observed that staff only advises the public as to the ,date of a given public hearing and that any one is welcome to attend. Mayor.Pro -Tem Kelly mentioned that the people who have been following the single family subdivision moratorium should be notified of the public hearing on the ordinance amendments. CONCERN EXPRESSED OVER COUNCIL GETTING INTO ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS Member Smith said he was concerned over the Council's immediate reaction to concerns of residents in areas of policy that staff presently is handling. He referred to the -report on the animal control policy on raccoons as an example. He suggested that agenda items be the Mayor's decision or a consensus of the Council Members. Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly said this was worthy of discussion but that she felt that everything that anybody hears about should come before the Council. LETTER OF CONGRATUTATIONS TO BE SENT TO ERIC HEDBLOM Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly suggested that the Manager send a letter congratulating Eric Hedblom on his recent marriage. It was informally agreed that this be done. 1990 BUDGET HEARING ON 10/2/89 DISCUSSED Manager Rosland reminded the Council that, as required by the Truth in Taxation legislation, the City will be publishing a quarter page notice in the Minneapolis Star Tribune this week advising Edina citizens of a 1990 Budget Hearing on October 2, 1989. The notice will state that a proposed increase in property taxes for 1990 is to be considered and will ask for public comment on the proposal. BROWNING - FERRIS LETTER ON POLITICS OF WASTE .DISPOSAL DISTRIBUTED Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly referred to a letter addressed to public officials in Minnesota regarding The Politics of Waste Disposal and asked that copies be given to the other Council Members who did not receive it. Copies were made and distributed. APPOINTMENT TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & PLANNING COMMISSION TO BE MADE Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly referred to the list of Community Development and Planning Commission members and their terms of office which had been included in the Council packet. She reminded the Council that Mayor Richards has asked that names of individuals be submitted for him to consider to fill the current vacancy. RESOLUTION REIATING TO G.O. TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS:-SERIES 1989 CONTINUED TO 10 /2/89 Manager Rosland recommended that adoption of the Resolution Relating to General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1989 be continued to the meeting of October 2, 1989 so that additional information could be provided. Notion of Member Paulus was seconded by Member Smith to continue adoption of the Resolution Relating to General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds; Series 1989, to October 2, 1989. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly Motion carried. Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly suggested that this item be moved up on the agenda so that it could be discussed earlier in the meeting. The Council Members concurred with the suggestion. r 1 *CIAIMS PAID Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Rice to approve payment of the following claims as per pre -list dated 9/18/89: General Fund $955,506.81, CDBG $5,678.41, Communications $2,214.90, Art Center $5,676.21, Capital Fund $445.00, Swimming Pool Fund $520.57, Golf Course Fund $37,051.18, Recreation Center Fund $9,479.23, Gun Range Find $369.34, Edinborough Park $10,247.83, Utility Fund $23,433.79, Liquor Dispensary Fund $129,919.60, Construction Fund $704,023.79, $1,884,566.66 and to confirm payment of the following Claims dated 8- 31 -89: General Fund $162,488.57, Communications $23.38, Art Center $1,054.49, Swimming Pool Fund $12,523.23, Golf Course Fund $27,430.61, Recreation Center Find $6,278.95, Gun Range Fund $429.33, Edinborough Park $10,260.45, Utility Fund $43,419.60, Liquor Dispensary Fund $306,554.19, Total $570,462.80. Motion was carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. Member Smith referred to the $100 /month payment being made to retired police officers. He said he understood this was part of a contract made some years ago and questioned if value was being received. Manager Rosland explained that it was a contract made in approximately 1972 and recalled that the Council challenged that shortly after he became manager. After researching the contract it was concluded that the City was obligated to those provisions. The officers are to provide 10 hours of service for month. Chief Swanson said that the services provided include recruiting, putting up Neighbors Home Watch signs, consulting for the crime fund, preparing scripts for television shows and researching featured topics, etc. Manager Rosland said there is some frustration in following these officers to provide the services. Chief Swanson made two observations: First, that in the original negotiations this was conceived as a supplemental retirement and was not perceived to be a work program. The officers had attempted to obtain supplemental retirement benefits similar to the firemens' fund through the legislature but were unsuccessful. This was to be an alternative to that. Secondly, in the late 1970's with the police officer standard in training there was a change in the definition of a police officer so that when these people retire they really cannot do police work anymore. Chief Swanson said they continue to work with the program and revisit it often. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, motion of Member Smith was seconded by Member Paulus for adjournment. Motion carried unanimously. Adjournment at 10:55,p.m. City Clerk o e 7Y, .by BBB REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor and Council Agenda Item #Ili• From: Kenneth E. Rosland Consent ❑ City Manager Information Only ❑ Date: October 2, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: 1990 Budget To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance 0 Discussion Recommendation: Hold public hearing and discuss 1990 Budget Info /Background: See Attached Budget Message Also attached are letters received. concerning the proposed increase in property taxes for 1990. o e � o e 0 1990 City of Edna Budget V .1ti' TO: MAYOR RICHARDS AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: KENNETH E. ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER SUBJ: 1990 CITY OF EDINA BUDGET DATE: October 2, 1989 I am pleased to submit for your consideration, the proposed 1990 City of Edina Budget. EXPENDITURES Our proposed 1990 general fund expenditures are $12,958,492, which represents a 4.6% increase over 1989. Figures 1 and 2 illustrate the distribution of the proposed expenditures by-area and by type of expenditure. Figure 1 - Summary of Expenditures by Area Public Safety (459) leneral Govt (1494 Non-0epL (494 1(13%) Figure 2 - Summary of Expenditures by Type Gontrad. Secs. (1494 Commc Equipment (794 (21%) 1990 Budget Page - 2 The following items comprise significant changes: Wages and Salary Adjustment The proposed budget includes a wage and salary adjustment of 3 %. Comparable Worth Adjustment Comparable worth adjustments totalling $75,000 have been spread among all departments. This represents the final year of the comparable worth adjustments. Staff Additions The only proposed staff addition for 1990 is a drug enforcement officer in the Police Department. This officer is specifically trained and assigned to drug enforcement. Drug use and abuse is a national problem that does not stop at Edina's borders. Recently, under- cover operations conducted by the Police Department have substantiated the use and traf- ficking of drugs in Edina. There is a community -wide effort to combat drug use, and a part of that effort should include enforcement. Currently, drug investigations are referred to the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office for any follow -up or undercover work. They do not respond to day -to -day intelligence, nor will they involve themselves with the street level ac- tivities in Edina. This creates the void of not having attention paid to information about drugs as developed by citizens, arrested persons, informants or patrol officers. The proposed budget for this position is $32,300. South Hennepin A $642 increase in our support of South Hennepin Human Services Council is recom- mended. Human Relations A $2,525 increase is recommended to be directed toward chemical abuse issues. Recycling The proposed recycling budget of $149,885 represents the cost of the 1990 project recently approved by the City Council. This is an increase of $75,300 from 1989. Cafeteria Plan The budgeted figure represents a $10 per month increase in the City's contribution for each employee's insurance package. Additionally, the amount shown includes the start-up cost for the Cafeteria Plan and Flex- Benefits program. The added monthly contribution and start -up cost represents a $40,000 increase from 1989. Elections Elections were not held in 1989, but will be held in 1990. An increase of $45,000 is there- fore required. 1989 Budget Page - 3 Futures Commission The Second Century project team requests funding in the amount of $10,000 for their 1990 work. Gopher State Program This is a mandated program from the State which establishes a central agency to locate buried utilities. The expected cost is $7,500. Overtime A total increase in overtime for the Police Department and the Fire Department of $10,000 is recommended to maintain current service levels. REVENUES Figure 3 illustrates the proposed distribution of 1990 revenues. Figure 3 - Summary of Revenues by Type Intergov't Aid (7 %) Fees & Charges (15 %) Licenses & Permits (5 %) 1990 Budget Page - 4 The following revenue sources deserve particular attention: Licenses /Permits and Fees & Charges We are recommending an overall increase of 5.0% in licenses/permits and fees & charges revenues. Some specific fees & charges or licenses/permits show only a small increase or even a reduction in revenue. This is due not as a result of a reduced fee structure, but be- cause of reduced volume. The proposed increases in licenses /permits and fees & charges is based on our analysis of our costs. Real and Personal Property Taxes The proposed 1990 budget requires a levy of $9,420,032. This levy represents a 4.7% in- crease in property tax revenues. As you know, the 1989 property tax law remains a topic of debate and speculation. There- fore, our ability to forecast the effect of our budget increase on the tax burden of residential and non - residential property is extremely limited: Likewise, it is very difficult to speculate on the levy limit formula that will affect our 1990 levy. We believe the proposed budget is feasible based on our present understanding of the law. Out F /Yl-. IL v ,7-� , 6 J-U- 4900 Payton Court . I - 4 6 29 CA sco Ava E DNA CITY COVIVC11- �oINA, MN y 4 god W. S0 t�. Jai . 9— 27— 89 >INA( MN 25� E08 j gei 86,41- 7 .r es t AYr 11,6Ae nY R,Ai- E 1rA. -= 7Akar W0A1'7 UP /92, Ar1r0 7H /f yff,*R T At7 FAeiro W/7W A 2,F% /A/CiPO-A Si T /vaw Py 266 / IN -rA k e r. TN P4A v �ivaidjll - T A/l Our oa tir ##vrs &Y JMrzr Learlf lowv / C946-try / .rc/ ,1004, , VD Cary -rA D) D T 40r A 8% PAY 1A1CRBAST-r Z OP c'ol gss- Alec- - Ah Lucky n? GFr 3 -S 70 /P Au- Goer wau kvw CAA/ T AFpfk.6 70 vf /N ylr #eVfr If _ Rpg 7- /AV /,✓ A Fi�w i �P-r r70 c$ /rrs Yov. /i MA CrICA c �:1- Rh�c�; � LvB,P,�,ao �e+n A �B fiPa�%Y /0 Yeager 4,VD A'h AvR 7`d 6-ar TAP= 7-l.'Qe/7eA17- 13P IVrEP'/? 6F 2 7 S /hO�vT�, ��l�l/ PRR_Jr1.vr '%•AXrsr 74w- OA/77R& SAY- -� J e-rAT$nr VP 8Y 7`�kk�J, PPP/ . Ar-",e TA L/C 0 P /} %3 P/e1Pl3R%�/ r-Ak R18gr ?-aR rr,,grr Yerqq VIS If Ncr ��i' . —/ rPECI Ara r WkFA� Pe-0P417 0v; frA7-Zr PAY A6ou'r IA 7Y,6r TXore r, LFT tl Fi✓c-UUif,44f You To ;D0 S'Dr, ,FT,9JVf "vyr T1/ /f U/�Rt�A SONFfiBLL` %tea' %3 URl7FA/ ' TR- A -Af!KJ FO/t L. rl reAq v <, Pf, T W /Lt- ARX 0 UT 0tr %ObvN OA/ ©Cr: Z So T LG h /SI T/XE f/A9'i'IV4, Notice to ail Edina Gi�izens Proposed increase min property.tax"es for 1990. The Edina City Council is proposing to increase total property taxes to be collected for 1990, by 4.7 percent over 1989 taxes. Total amount proposed: - $9,420,032 . .1 This increase is a proposal only. All citizens of Edina are invited to attend a public hearing where the City - Council will discuss the proposed increase. The board will vote to approve or disapprove this amount at the hearing. Please come and give the members of the board your opinions on this proposal. Public Hearing ' 1 Date: October 2,1989 Hour: 7:00 P.M. Place: City Council Chambers Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota } If additional time is needed, the hearing will be reconvened on October 16,1989, at 7:00 P.M. in the same place. f summaries of the City's proposed 1990 j budget are available for review in the Finance Department, Edina City Hall. Persons unable to attend this' hearing may send written comments to the Council at the above address. For more information, call the City of Edina, Finance Department: 927 -8861, 8 -4:30 P.M., M -F. 1 i Minneapolis Star Tribune Friday, September 22, 1989 r� - 1 Agenda Item III. 4150 MULTIFOODS TOWER MINNEAPOLIS CITY CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 September 29, 1989 Edina City Council Edina City Hall 4801 West 50.th Street Edina, MN 55424 Ladies and Gentlemen: I am sending a written comment to you concerning the proposed property tax increase of 4.7% for 1990. I live at 4705 Sunnyside Road. It is a beautiful home and I enjoy living there. I bought the home from my grandfather's estate in 1983. Although the home was a stretch purchase for me as a single person, I wanted to keep the home in the family. When I moved into the house, my taxes were in excess of $4,000. Every year since I moved into the house, they have increased by approximately 10 %. In six years they have increased by over 50% from what I paid in 1983. My taxes this year were over $6,000. This does not include the special assessments I pay from time to time for the "pond harvesting," tree cutting, etc. I was appalled to read that you are considering yet another steep increase. If my tax statements are any indication, the City of Edina has been able to use increased market values as a basis for steep tax increases every year. I wish my income increased at the same rate. I have had to tighten my belt to just be able to afford my home. I'd ask that the Council do the same and reduce its budget for 1990. G17WDEHgmw0928891 o e �. ^ 01 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland From: Craig Larsen Date: October 2, 1989 Subject: LD -89 -5, Leo Evans and Dennis Wegner, generally located south of Vernon Avenue and east of Olinger Road Agenda Item # IV. D• Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion • Recommendation: The Planning Commission has recommended approval of the lot division. Action is not subject to the moratorium. Info /Background: The proposed division will correct a problem with the legal descriptions of the two properties. The owners are exchanging small triangular pieces of property. LOCATION MAP All clam Ing Ian mss a son man I � �„�or�e. � :: � :i :111: ■ 11� a� ii � � amp i1� �'� E W!, milling I EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT LD -89 -5 Leo Evans and Dennis Wegner. Generally located south of Vernon Avenue and east of Olinger Road Request: Lot line adjustments Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the subject property involves a vacant parcel of about 9.5 acres owned by Leo Evans, and a developed single family lot owned by Dennis Wegner. The Wegner property fronts on Olinger Road and is in the south westerly corner of the Evans property. Mr. Larsen pointed out a survey has discovered that Wegners southerly lot line is not coincident with the rear property lines of the developed lots to the south. Instead, Evans owns a small triangular "piece between the Wegner property and the lots to the south. To correct the problem and-make the lot lines coincident Evans and Wegner have agreed to a property exchange. The trade moves Wegners north property line about 13 feet south. The adjustment "squares off" the Wegner property and gives Evans a useable piece of property. Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends approval. The Commission was in agreement that the proposed correction to the lot lines makes sense by squaring off the Wegner'property and giving Evans a useable piece of property. Commissioner McClelland moved to recommend approval of the lot division: Commissioner Faust seconded the, motion. Ayes; McClelland, Hale, Faust, L. Johnson, V. Shaw and G. Johnson. Motion carried. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SEPTEMBER 22, 1989 LD -89 -5 Leo Evans and Dennis Wegner. Generally located south of Vernon Avenue and east of Olinger Road Request: Lot line adjustments The subject property involves a vacant parcel of about 9.5 acres owned by Leo Evans, and a developed single family lot owned by Dennis Wegner. The Wegner property fronts on Olinger Road and is in the south westerly corner of the Evans property. A survey has discovered that Wegners southerly lot. line is not coincident with the rear property lines of the developed lots to the south. Instead, Evans owns a small triangular piece between the Wegner property and the lots to the south (see attached graphic). To correct the problem and make the lot lines coincident Evans and Wegner have agreed to a property exchange. The trade moves Wegners north property line about 13 feet south. The adjustment "squares off" the.Wegner property and gives Evans a useable piece of property. Recommendation: Approval N M h O 3 a� � ao 33 0 d W I 1 � o W BE2NE o k ° o 3 3 V 1 3 a� � ao 33 0 a N to 33 SC.q— : I "= So' d W I 1 � J BE2NE a N to 33 SC.q— : I "= So' Q I / Z / ' R OPT v 'ry nLit-' ✓ 'E' 0 3 To E U ArN S N 0"1 O Z -(--A Iron r 0.69 E, 0.67 S. 4o6.1S 0.34C N at3° 28 1'7 "6 O. 63 S, eSe-� p� N r 'On Exc.ep �. Per N � - N FQRoN4 GU R^1 S M w 6-C7 4 I OZ o 0 Z 4oro. 15 N SS °28' 17 "E. l•o•. I t:02 E. 0.62 S. 9!.5.00 AJ LY LINE of EVLNA 1IIC4HLANDS 1�KESIDE ADDMOn ml I 19 9 Ir4 E p 1-1 A { 11 G>r1 l At�1C S m ' S1 ✓ CO /IiPr O/' SE %¢ o� NW %a of SPZ'. 32 o@JIJ.I Denotes Judiciul land Mork • Lirnotes Iron Hbnunrnt Found c vrota• Im+ Lbnv� ^t Jet I 1 � Q I / Z / ' R OPT v 'ry nLit-' ✓ 'E' 0 3 To E U ArN S N 0"1 O Z -(--A Iron r 0.69 E, 0.67 S. 4o6.1S 0.34C N at3° 28 1'7 "6 O. 63 S, eSe-� p� N r 'On Exc.ep �. Per N � - N FQRoN4 GU R^1 S M w 6-C7 4 I OZ o 0 Z 4oro. 15 N SS °28' 17 "E. l•o•. I t:02 E. 0.62 S. 9!.5.00 AJ LY LINE of EVLNA 1IIC4HLANDS 1�KESIDE ADDMOn ml I 19 9 Ir4 E p 1-1 A { 11 G>r1 l At�1C S m ' S1 ✓ CO /IiPr O/' SE %¢ o� NW %a of SPZ'. 32 o@JIJ.I Denotes Judiciul land Mork • Lirnotes Iron Hbnunrnt Found c vrota• Im+ Lbnv� ^t Jet I;i *111601 0R] WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute various separate parcels: WEGNER TRACT: All that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 32, Township 117, Range 21, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the West line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter distant 425.4 feet North from the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter'of said Section 32; thence North 87 degrees East a distance of 406.15 feet, thence north parallel with the West line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 107.25 feet, thence South 87 degrees West a distance of 406.15 feet to the West line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, thence South along said West line a distance of 107.25 feet to the point of beginning. EVANS TRACT: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 32, Township 117, Range 21, described as follows: Beginning at a point which center line of County Road intersects the West line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence South along said West line 260 feet to a point 382 feet North of the Southwest corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence parallel with center line of said County Road North 87 degrees East 565 feet to an iron post; thence North 46 degrees 36 minutes East 460.3 feet to an iron post; thence North 24 degrees 31 minutes East 319.1 feet; thence North 53 degrees 39 minutes East 225 feet more or less to the East line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence North to the Northeast corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence West and Southwesterly following centerline of said County Road to point of beginning, EXCEPT therefrom all that part lying Southerly and Southeasterly of the Northerly and Northwesterly line of EDINA HIGHLANDS LAKESIDE ADDITION, and further excepting therefrom all of the land above described as the WEGNER TRACT. WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to subdivide said tracts into the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "Parcels "): WEGNER TRACT: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 32, Township 117, Range 21, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the west line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter with the northerly line of EDINA HIGHLANDS LAKESIDE ADDITION; thence easterly along the northerly line of said EDINA HIGHLANDS LAKESIDE ADDITION 406.15 feet; thence northerly and parallel with the west line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter 107.25 feet; thence westerly and.parallel with the northerly line of EDINA HIGHLANDS LAKESIDE ADDITION 406.15 feet to the west line of said Southeast Quarter of the'Northwest Quarter; thence southerly along the west line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter 107.25 feet to the point of beginning. The north line of EDINA HIGHLANDS LAKESIDE ADDITION is marked by Judicial Landmarks set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 14146. EVANS TRACT: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 32, Township 117, Range 21, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the Northerly line of EDINA HIGHLANDS LAKESIDE ADDITION distant 406.15 feet East along said Northerly line from the West line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, said Northerly line is marked by Judicial Landmarks set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 14146; thence North parallel with the West line of said Southeast Quarter'of the Northwest Quarter, 107.25 feet; thence West, parallel with said - Northerly line, 406.15 feet to said West line; thence North along said West line 144.86 feet, more or less, to the center line of County Road No. 158; thence Northeasterly along said center line to the East line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence South along said East line to the most Northerly corner of EDINA HIGHLANDS LAKESIDE ADDITION; thence Southwesterly and Westerly along the Northerly line of said addition, which line was determined in Torrens Case No. 14146, to the point of beginning. WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivison and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance Nos. 801 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or.as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. ADOPTED this 2nd day of October, 1989. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting-City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby cetify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 2, 1989 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk y .ry91�11�,, °k @ n City of Edina, Minnesota H�o �° OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 • (612) 927 -8861 DATE: October 6, 1989 TO: James A. Ostenforf 412 Z_ FROM: Marcella M Daehn RE: Lot Division - Leo Evans Property ITEM(S): NO. DESCRIPTION I Draft Resolution for above lot division PURPOSE: As you requested Review and return For your information x Reply to sender For your approval Other (see remarks) REMARKS: In order to complete the resolution for the Lot Division for the Leo Evans Drnnarty and the Wegner tract please provide me with legal descriptions as indicated on the draft RESOLUTION DIRAFT WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute various separate parcels: (Here describe each existing parcel - before division) and WHEREAS; the owners of the above tracts of land desire to subdivide said tracts into the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "Parcels "): (Here describe each new parcel - after division) WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision andZoning REgulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivison and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance No.s 801 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of.said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute various separate parcels: Wegner tract: All that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter-'of Section 32, Township 117, Range 21, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the West line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter distant 425.4 feet North from the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 32; thence North 87 degrees Fast a distance of 406.15 feet, thence north parallel with the West line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 107.25 feet, thence South 87 degrees West a distance of 406.15 feet to the West line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, thence South along said West line a distance of 107.25 feet to the point of beginning. Evans tract: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 32, Township 117, Range 21, described as follows: Beginning at a point which center line of County Road inter- sects the West line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence South along said West line 260 feet to.a point 382 feet North of the Southwest corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence parallel with center line of said County Road North 87 degrees East 565 feet to an iron post;-thence North 46 degrees 36 minutes East 460.3 feet to an iron post; thence North 24 degrees 31 minutes East 319.1 -ed thence North 53 degrees 39 minutes East 225 feet more or less to the East line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence North to the Northeast corner of said South- east Quarter of the NORTHWEST Quarter; thence West and Sout westerly following centerline of said County Road to po' of beginning, EXCEPT- therefrom all that part lying Sout y and Southeasterly ldina Highlands Lakeside Addition, and further excepting ther rom all of the land above described as the WEGNER TRACT. ,uW � �., WHEREAS, the owners of the above described tr is of land desire to subdivide said tracts into the following described new and separate parcels (herein called ' :Parcels ") : Wegner tract: See Exhibit "A" hereto attached. Evans tract: See Exhibit "B" hereto attached. V - I That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 32, Township f 117, Range 21, Hennpin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the west line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter with the northerly line of EDINA HIGHLANDS LAKESIDE ADDITION; thence easterly along the northerly line of said EDINA HIGHLANDS LAKESIDE ADDITION 406.15 feet; thence northerly and parallel with the west line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter 107.25 feet; thence westerly and parallel with - the northerly line of EDINA HIGHLANDS LAKESIDE ADDITION 406.15 feet to the west line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence southerly along the west line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter 107.25 feet to the point of beginning. The north line of EDINA HIGHLANDS LAKESIDE ADDITION is marked by Judicial Landmarks set j pursuant to Torrens Case -No. 14146. EXHIBIT "A" That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 32, Township 117, Range 21, Hennepin County, Minnesota, desbribed as follows: Beginning at a point on the Northerly line of EDINA HIGHLANDS LAKESIDE ADDITION. distant 406.15 feet East along said Northerly line from the West line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, said Northerly line is marked by Judicial Landmarks set pursuant to Tor rens Case No. 14146; thence North parallel with the"West line of said Southeast Quarter.of the Northwest Quarter, 107.25 feet; thence West, parallel with said Northerly line, 406.15 feet to said West line;.-thence North along said West line 144.86 feet; more or less, to the center line of County Road No. 158;. thence'Northeasterly along said center line to the East line of said_ Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence South along said East line to the most Northerly corner of EDINA HIGHLANDS LAKESIDE ADDITION; thence Southwesterly and Westerly along the Northerly line of said addition, which line was deterri -ed in Torrens Case No. 14146, to the point of beginning. X55. : 6, A. 0 �WtPOM 'age REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland From: Philip S. Dommer Date: October 2, 1989 Subject: B- 89 -20, An appeal of a decision by the Edina Board of Appeals to gran a lot width and area variance to build a new home on a 45' lot at 5616 Wooddale Avenue Agenda Item # IV• E. . Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action [ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion J. Recommendation: The Board of Appeals granted approval of the Variances as presented. Info /Background: The Edina Board of Appeals reviewed the subject case on September 7, 1989. On September 11, 1989, the homeowners at 5600 Wooddale Avenue submitted a letter to the City Clerk appealing the Boards decision. Since then other letters have been received from neighbors regarding this issue. Please refer to the attached: 1. Neighbors letters. 2. BOA Draft Minutes 3. Staff Report Kai 19Z9 6-8F ao� au -cbk 7o- aploca.L �e c4t L7,k ' 00 0,,Ue cZ �7W aa �- 7 W� 0;:?00// wax. xA-1- I'x-j 'lam. `5l cticd �. �o- U-e " Lx&�-. /" Q&Zzo O & I ej oxz�t lAx.k fa� k WtA-,evev k--Ix �c�Oro��ax�e� 3p' �r�k�v,�, r� �.e ,o�o�oEd WIN September 24, 1989 To: Members of the Edina City Council Edina, Mintiesota Subject: Granting of request for property variance and acceptance of proposed building structure to be built at 5616 Wooddale Avenue Lot 5, Block 4, Subd. Littel Park Gentlemen: We have in hand the Edina Board of Appeals and Adjustment Staff Report dated September 7, 1989. We also have a copy of the plans for the proposed structure to be constructed on that property. It is our understanding that the Staff recommendation was against granting the variance given the submitted proposed building plan. They recommended that the propted building plan be changed to a plan with a front entrance to conform with the existing neighborhood building patterns. The report states that if the plan submitted was carried out it has the potential of "threatening property values of adjacent property ". This is a logical conclusion given the very narrow lot involved. The problem was carefully studied and the recommendation was logical and valid. For most of us,,our property in this neighborhood represents our largest financial asset and we are VERY concerned about the property values in this neighborhood. The statement made by the Appeals Board concerning threatening property values is not taken lightly. It should be stated that we have no question as to the need to improve the involved property. It.has been unoccupied and very poorly taken care of for several years. Improvement is long overdue. However, such improvement can be accomplished by simply putting a front entrance on this house and not attempting to "cram" it in at the side on this narrow lot. There seems very little sense in asking adjoining properties to risk property values when the solution is so easily reached. Edina has an outstanding record of making wise and logical decisions as regards the design and use of village properties. As long time residents we ask that the Council reconsider the acceptance of the -2- proposed building plan until the design of the exterior is made to be more in keeping with existing homes. Name Address, Name -i.�c�; Address`(;Q07fE� Name Addr Name Addr Name �. Address �i�,�• Nam ew/1 jj w4 I A zi Address d• haU� a�• o�lAo� -h� i �y � (�t�G d ids v�cc�ve firpNo , v�' ikc. 7 * w+��fi �a • aC s �f u,r� ov o1 �- au-v l �u V -f yt,�' •o�vs� J lout I� Gc. !- Sao I to 01 ni2YA Q s;- mac- Lt) q� da Ave, � • RECEIVED SEP 2 61989 1% r i IV- pro R E C E I F, D SEP `? 1989 - cyo� -�� t''o B -89 -20 Robert and Valerie Kosky 5616 Wooddale Avenue Lot 5, Block 4 Subd. of Littel Park Request: A lot area variance and a 30 foot lot width variance to build a new home on an existing 45 foot wide lot Mr. Dommer informed the Board the subject property is an existing platted lot which is developed with a single family home and large garage. The dimensions of the lot are 45' X 187'. The property is in a line of six 45 foot wide lots. Four of the lots have been combined into two 90 foot lots. The subject property and an adjacent property remain as 45 foot lots. Other lots in the area are 60 feet wide or greater. Mr. Dommer explained the homeowner desires to tear down the existing home and build a new home. The garage will not be altered. Mr. Dommer added a lot width and area variance are required to build on the substandard lot. Mr. Dommer pointed out generally, the City has supported construction on existing platted lots. The exception has been in the case where the proposed structure would be injurious to adjacent properties. Mr. Dommer asked the Board to note that the proposed home orients to the side lot lines. These side yards are small in comparison to the front and rear yards. The front door opens to the north and a patio door opens to the south.. No doors are on the front or rear of the home. Further, the windows also primarily open to the sides. The combined front and rear elevations have 136 square feet of glass. The combined side elevations have 486 square feet of glass. Mr. Dommer said the style of the home is unique and fits the needs of the homeowners. The homes in the area are relatively uniform and in close proximity to one another. In areas of close proximity, and uniformity unique homes have a tendency to be more prominent. Mr. Dommer concluded the subject lot is very narrow, however, staff believes that a single family home including the existing dwelling is a reasonable use of the property. In areas of narrow lots, however, citing and window /door orientation is critical. The presented design does not take advantage of the significant depth of the.lot. Rather it orients to the sides to which other properties are in close proximity. Granting of the variance without conditions to orient the home to the front and rear in a traditional manner would be injurious to adjacent properties In the City of Edina unique style homes are common place. In areas of close proximity and uniformity strikingly unique plans as those presented alter the essential character of the surroundings and may threaten property values of the adjacent properties. In areas of greater spacing, unique plans are entirely appropriate. For example, if the lot were an existing 75 foot lot a permit would be issued for reuse of the property and the presented plan could be built. For the above cited reasons, staff recommends denial of the request, The proponent, Mr. Kosky was present, interested neighbors were present. Mr. Hale asked who owned the land north of the property in questions. Mr. Dommer said the lot is owned by the adjoining neighbor. Mrs. Gunn, 5606 Wooddale and Mrs. Lee, 5600 Wooddale were present and told the Board they did not receive a formal notice of the hearing. Mr. Dommer apologized to Mrs. Gunn and Mrs. Lee regarding the oversight. He explained that their properties along with one other property was issued an incorrect PIN number. When this number was "called up" for the mailing list an incorrect property owner was found to be recorded for those numbers. He told Mrs. Gunn and Mrs. Lee that that matter was corrected and added he was happy they heard about the meeting and were present this evening to offer their comments. Mrs. Gunn told the Board she was not happy having a "front door" on the side of the proposed house. Mr. Runyan explained that a °front door" does not necessarily have to be in the front yard, though that is what is traditionally constructed and accepted. Mr. Kosky told the Board he realizes the house is "different" from a traditional type of house but added in the area in question there are many different varieties of houses. Mr. Dommer explained that staff feel the house should orient north /south versus the proposed east /west. He added in a neighborhood of relatively small lots and more traditional type of houses a unique house disrupts the neighborhoods character and symmetry. Mr. Kosky said if the proposed house were to be changed to a north /south direction the character of the house he is proposing would be violated. Mr. Runyan said this is a difficult matter to pass judgement on because it seems to involve the aesthetics of the proposed house. The variance request is for a variance from the lot width requirement of 75 feet._ This type of variance is generally granted. Mr. Kosky pointed out that there is quite a bit of open space around the proposed house. Mr. Albinson, 5620 Wooddale, told the Board the proposed house is acceptable to . him. He added the house that is located on the property at the present time is unacceptable. A house of new construction will improve the neighborhood. Mr. Hale said he feels the design.of the house is a concern and he cannot support the request. Mr. Olson asked Mrs. Gunn her opinion on the design of the proposed house. Mrs. Gunn said what is proposed is an improvement over what is there at the present time. Mr. Runyan said he understands it is difficult to find an appropriate plan to construct a house on a narrow lot. He added the design of the proposed house is contemporary, adding in his opinion, that should not be used as a reason for denial of the request. Mr. Olson moved to recommend approval of the variance request. Mr. Bentley seconded the motion. Ayes; Olson, Bentley, Utne, Runyan. Nays; Hale. Motion carried. Mr. Kosky was advised that there is a 10 day waiting period before a permit can be obtained. T 1 '10 11,01'alm m - � LWMA I ki I i Ll I I ki re- W-0 a EDINA BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS STAFF REPORT SEPTEMBER 7, 1989 B -89 -20 Robert and Valerie Kosky 5616 Wooddale Avenue Lot 5, Block 4 Subd. of Littel Park Request: A lot area variance and a 30 foot lot width variance to build a new home on an existing 45 foot wide lot The subject property is an existing platted lot which is developed with a single family home. and large garage. The dimensions of the lot are 45' X 187'. The property is in a line of six 45 foot wide lots. Four of the lots have been combined into two 90 foot lots. The subject property and an adjacent property remain as 45 foot lots. Other lots in the area are 60 feet wide or greater. The homeowner desires to tear down the existing home and build a new home. The garage will not be. altered. A lot width and-area variance are required to build on the substandard lot. (Ordinance 825.7). Generally, the City has supported construction on existing platted lots. The exception has been in the case where the proposed structure would be injurious to adjacent properties. (Recent examples include B- 88 -15, Withdrawn Prior to Hearing and B- 87 -39, minutes attached). The plans of the proposed dwelling are attached. The home orients to the side lot lines. These side yards are small in comparison to the front and rear yards. The front door opens to the north and a patio door opens to the south. No doors are on the front or rear of the home. The windows also primarily open to the sides. The combined front and rear elevations have 136 square feet of glass. The combined side elevations have 486 square feet of glass. The style of the home is unique and fits the needs of the homeowners. The homes in the area are relatively uniform and in close proximity to one another. In areas of close proximity, and uniformity unique homes have a tendency to be more prominent. P5 Recommendation: The subject lot is very narrow, however, staff, believes that a single family home including the existing dwelling is.a reasonable use of the property. In areas of narrow lots, however, siting and window /door orientation is critical. The presented design does not take advantage of the significant depth of the lot. Rather it orients to the sides to which other properties are in close proximity. Granting of the variance without conditions to orient the home to the front and rear in a traditional manner would be injurious to adjacent properties. In the.City of Edina unique style homes are common place. In areas of close .proximity and uniformity strikingly unique plans as those presented alter the essential character of the surroundings and may threaten property values of the adjacent properties. In areas of greater spacing, unique plans are entirely appropriate. For example, if the lot were an existing 75 foot lot a permit would be issued for reuse of the property and the presented plan. could be built. For the.above cited reasons, staff recommends denial of the request, Mr. Dommer added the lot is heavily wooded and exceeds 1 and 1/2 a A in size. The lot is difficult to develop, however, the proposed plan exceeds all other ordinance requirements and will preserve a good number of the trees. Mr. Dommer concluded staff recommends approval of the variance as presented. Granting of the variances will allow reasonable use of the property and will not alter the character of the neighborhood. The proponents, Mr. and Mrs. Murphy and their architect Mr. Bonner were present. Mr. Bonner explained to the Board the vegetation along the "neck" driveway will be,preserved as much as possible. Mr. Bonner added he anticipates the loss of one large oak tree and some smaller caliber trees. Mr. Bonner pointed during the summer the house would be heavily screened due to the dense vegetation. Mrs. Patterson whose property abuts the driveway expressed concern about possible erosion of the driveway after it is constructed. Mr. Runyan told Mrs. Patterson the City's Engineering and Building Departments will evaluate the submitted plans on the drive -way assuring its correct construction. Mrs. Utne moved for variance approval. Mr. Palmer seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion carried. OLD BUSINESS B -87 -39 Thomas Barron Builders-, Inc, i 5908 Vernon Avenue Lot 7, Block 2 Mirror Lakes Meadow 2nd Addition to Edina Highlands Request: A 31 foot lot depth variance and a 28 foot front yard setback variance to construct a new single dwelling unit CI Mr. Dommer reviewed for the Board what had taken place at the previous . Board of Appeals and Adjustments Meeting regarding this issue. The proponent, Mr. Thomas and Mr. Barron, the developer and III interested residents were present. _ A considerable discussion ensued between members of the Board, the proponents and interested neighbors. The Board concluded the property owner has the legal right to develop his property but special attention should be given to its development. The character and symmetry of the neighborhood must be maintained and the placement of the house must blend into the topography. —.�_�. - :ice..— .���_. ..'��'^.'Cl �,= �1.r.��+•.•- >.G.�_.a�.., �... ��..�- .,_,.. ._ ....ary��t.r.- �•rnL` -;+±n f Mrs. Utne moved for variance, approval subject to staff conditions with the recommendation the plans are to be altered to better suit the site. Mrs. Utne said the previous plans submitted (1980) in her opinion suited the site better. Mrs. Utne asked Mr. Dommer if it is reasonable to request an alteration of the plan. Mr. Dommer said a recommendation to alter the plans to better suit the site is reasonable but the variances needed more than likely would change from the ones requested. Mrs. Utne withdrew her motion. Mr. Palmer moved to deny the. variance request not on the grounds of it appropriateness, the Board recognizes the right to develop this property but denial on the grounds that the plans presented are not sensitive to the topography and do.not maintain the character and symmetry of the neighborhood. Mrs. Utne seconded the motion. Mr. Runyan and Mr. Bentley voted Aye. Mr. Olson voted Nay. The motion carried. L. 5� P CI rt II r II I ii I; I�. til o i - I p --. i Ti I ?I J .. f: 777e :.0 :.U5'•9 ,•+� i.t .�i LTl1a'!$- ]_ ' ♦ � �ti •!.�: rM 4 f �f'.r'T��41••.ti.. Y3.; .` r.. e ft9ip'ry : . a+ ': r,` L' '.i!Z65� ."5�.� }•t,Z'+'.i',. �i+^1. 1. �? �f.; ~k:,.. .7: , ,,, �1. ti.�: 'r: � •.nr r.T d�R,, •�113 9* ., _ • r + `� �- y a l.'i...,2. +f. 11J ,•'{r- �.wy :A..0 . , ;i.•� • 1,«t�'. . ' .,, n... y. •.n: t 5J .Y �S't`g l SA 't r r • Z �., � -t: �.� =. r �q `arua, -: •,i� � � ,'.�.�,Z+ 'l'.r* Ir��',h.'r ,.�.e� °�.; rl6.Yty..s 'uJi.:�� S . -lC. •y , r•1` ya r. # �1: 'r.•y' ''+'• 4 :r '-~� ��:LM -. .yf...�t �`y �• l-'4 '. \' .v L •.Y: :'.i. + ' 1 lr� 1• i'F is eR. ,Z .'i -. t•:zi i-,y a. .fit n. i....trq� i b+, wxat.. ?�.. r5 i.. v?SL ,li tT „�, .49 t- _ :.Jt. ��..rs;.,1•e. -�" Y_.'){,,r, �� '+ i� .b ^.. If.i +et'. H +� NN1. r �y'fr � �ti'• .� iii - :,'�t'_t: 't :. -'r :•i.. �: ,ti. J1 r'rnf!` ' rl..:., e-n,ir1L ". ?e✓,.,i�,:r±�•: rj�r'�`d'':.S'' �� +�i•''Jr ,y� ,Si• •`'• +: � % i • '+ � - = Q�ER,�1�V�� _rilcJP�G%i __ „� .. a• r-T. L, • •;r �i, .�� „�rT� : e���'/r1rR'f;J•'�,�``�. -•-' , `,►r .0 Ni':I:.f 1 �..., r w1 r �'.� .s 1� +' _(Tewu{:Gripi` ,a°^'3r',�.iJ iB yl'�i:RS �rA <'F^ a� *y.4ty: iir'•.. : %.:°u' ^ ..1_::fs �' 1 r r . t l f.. Ri at,,. n r �' r 4', .. 4 t' , T !' c •� ' nty' f �• �I Y f •! . 1, +.. _..� ,1�J I..n. {�;� cr' }^ r'�•s;rr'•l Y'1• �i ry!�+ } -�5. 1{'. r f.,,i -'4. =r1:s� . r4r �' tA.,.. =t(s� r. 'r - f•. i`xc; SI .,s r•' .T, •w I. ."9.� C'a; I• � �.•,.: -S. i �!i�'� Jl.��n'�. ', .. ,� +gyp ;. �1�., � I "1 ^•fir.`.:`' i .1, ��r�yy,t •�:f J� r't r�.r. .��.,�� 1_ � \ 'f f�!ryr L f•�l,' 11411 r Jr Y• �, Crti .•5 �7 �,9N1 .''?r*�+i s• -•r� .• • �r..ti ._.. _ Iflu '/• �, (4 4 , 4 Y s -t• Y`f4 • ^-t a -�J� "Ii �,`:V,�: :,�,a Jnl�l�. St• 4r '� .i.,i. f I l 1 I rJ t ti• �p , yl 4. IM nT "71M> UNE� 5iit7Yi g..�ll ;rr � r(}u,:�h� iJ �'3`Fk � °t Y t:,'r y fir; J t ^'... :FJfi',r"�, _T:2 K:, is + ':71. a„ "wry '•�'. n1.1+ . a'• 'c• t i JI . - 'r:• +. . i .i � 11 �1t. - ., •_ 1 .-.._ e,• Kl. .ri i. y.w.FL � �� i ,, _./__-T - "t ...., 1;,y- .•„r...,.. r....�. .-r r, ,rly}l l a'� yti � .:tlrl R `_ � 1 / Lr, j� .f; ��fr; �• S.. —���' �..._ _. .e �1' r'- �•-- 7 —••+ -- vim.-- .ra•F-�-••w.•ti 'r� }•� °.° �'t,tl,; •,v .• 4�4.,n,'.._ ..�* �t ,IM,. •� �. I �. ` •�r� `3 ���; -'1" il-w Jai '� Z �..r�� '2sH ' RF-F. (wL) Y, Tr- 7. %sJ"�110itc►iwA61... •2...KtRHt�n1 -Sc. At -1 I v4 � : \1 � I is 1 .r � • r.�:'. [JEST ,. � � � ✓ t. � _ 4 _ . H • . Utf.rr+'_.•SczF.E ► d NEB — — • — �� % �, � �`• '�� it ,, ICI !!fi�rr'' yt♦ Y r 0 IN � i � � • ` •+..i3R/'�{il'.d7� i W J- 1.11.{b.l _ _ ., •� .. , 1 � is Ito - ,rrr11 � 'r+'•�i �•:�l 5 YA. .1 _ h - f-, ' �.. r �Iw .. r, .• L y }l ,a ' f r'i- j 'M ,` Y. � x+11 .r �....T� � r�r �.rrr�� � ... ' 4 1 .Y `t b It ( , .+i (• r'i..� t - '.1__ ..� _ ., � �,� .n " - '' • ° Y' !: �. , Y ✓` � ;'t 7 1 yl i � f' - a . � 1 � �,,�. C- FYNr r�J.bH1il�- -'. 1,71 t ;c„ YIkY1: =dAD (AND ACC. r) � .1 -., r' rev zi . � . � , i' '.r t ti ,g � - -• ' f�+�l1Ei+T 51LNXL%C•UU_ rtRY '� 1 V t Ir �J/A /nJriF . I t •`�,'. {� � � ri If.�Y•JY� .,,�• 'h � � �,�' +: � / � r.r �t`''t:' • . . rw ;�.��f��� :a: - _ f. :'J- .J ''i t: .l. f I.t:��.,�, .{ a�k• r.T 'i ".� i '�) - tf ��: .... - �: ��• .f` �•1 'd' �., `ifl; �.JY 'F'•� '•1„•r .w r _ 'r"• •.i ii,y: y- _.'<•.� >., ,.f. J- _r(S�• " I t ��� �3.. �.�.r ��i '��.i,'pi_r Ii.J,y; /V.��r �.r _ ir,' .L.: ♦ � (' ' ^�,, r ;i 'tsl �;'� ;`••'r'ti(t,.,``y� .'-f''L: ;}rI.:Y�•r_•r.. 1l.r =.I :i. ,F• �'� - - - .•t, ,u': „'s!.�'gg'a., .�.' ••t' Jri:'r Y:/ :Lhit.f.iA4�•: w'1 i.�liL •� • • ,� � �. , •its; t.!: r' .l: " " +, 1 ''( ` ♦f ly ll�...:��;pf�• �•n iy+/��4Ji>)r:�M �. � �•�j�:'�.n.:.. ' C' r'�' �. t.+ � r'ti:' � ..} '1' t .n Yom(' :a , .,(t. I rr�•G' �� ��7 ��� 'y.Gr :1J..” Y.µ•'!� Vii' fir• •'r• .,fi i' ".l. ^w r •r� • � J,f . ♦' f• Y. }. r •'f �('� -'f t :} L.-�_ �.� -. � — .T �. " r • .;t . �..r�. �"�r!;?�:.,� ° ' �' � ':i'i+.'e�. �:yYl., :r:r�. - •k.�..b;. '. . . ,., r'• a ./d, 7 ' Ir, �.: � H,tyom: •,r,,,. •�.t:, . ' :4;(:p.u.r.y+`V'. , }�:�;: ,�i. ;:l. Q ,`.�•• . �� .w.. ' .:Pi ' •('' j +i: •1- %Y 1. %r. }� ..1 '.. •• ti. 1:" rir!i.; "1 '.J ;):/ -1 .' J ..7 ,yA ^ /R4'�^ .: •l,. �. . M. ,.•�...r.' /� -r _- .Cl dF'Tlohl: _ E l- EVATLON�j. l'�F:1. 1. 'a•''�' '• ?.- r' PLK'L p�17 Y :'::,�= KDSK .. � .li _' _f.= -•P. ._. S'7: "- . � I.` •.. - t'Y ^�■ I' .. - Y(va A11 ^Wa _ }• .- Xt- .IJINPOW (ANDt?S EN) r �<<+ h14 ^. H "'P �t I L � r tsr,• ' 'Lt. '� „1 ,(,,, , 4.. ' , i •� a � � ” /.1r � f •. i • — ti y -Y /) ,�. O- � �rI 11. !'fir• i � � � y f -- �iAiWICl CPP.Fa7_�Et•IT•'KY;- KN4P.,�D�K� ;; Y ;.;+ .r' ��.,•(;,'i � y� �rf� ,, i'F�'u a � b � r.s.__= �I.EAfta Fd1•G" � 1f � ,y, for fir' � , r r . �. L t : •, .,'; . r _RAF oftp— (ArIL' AQ ! EELIL, Li ' is r !,.iy •'� ' 'a•� 3ti 43 f r( � .4 �' t n , tt'.l" • �•'.l'3' C' 4 t rI; `G•.�d. .5,,. L .. '� � * e °, •:, z` ':4�. r r � r i,. �S r n t'�. • {� �� �: • • I ., Via' � �. ;:' � ,',L 'I.ZfD�4L "ScR.EI:.j•1 NEJI _ - - -- 41, .,•. .IJINPOW (ANDt?S EN) r �<<+ h14 ^. H "'P �t I L � r tsr,• ' 'Lt. '� „1 ,(,,, , 4.. ' , i •� a � � ” /.1r � f •. i • — ti y -Y /) ,�. O- � �rI 11. !'fir• i � � � y f -- �iAiWICl CPP.Fa7_�Et•IT•'KY;- KN4P.,�D�K� ;; Y ;.;+ .r' ��.,•(;,'i � y� �rf� ,, i'F�'u a � b � r.s.__= �I.EAfta Fd1•G" � 1f � ,y, for fir' � , r r . �. L t : •, .,'; . r _RAF oftp— (ArIL' AQ ! ` Ar -Mr. Ir. I w91N��� V M �f , REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland Agenda Item # IV. F. From: Craig Larsen Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: October 2, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Sign Ordinance Amend- X❑ To Council ment Mixed Development District, MDD -6 Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution 0 Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adoption of attached Sign Ordinance Amendment. Info /Background: There are currently no sign regulations for the MDD -6 District (Centennial Lakes). The proposed amendment adds specific requirements for the MDD -6 District. The amendment establishes requirements for overall development signage, signage on individual projects within the development, and for retail - commercial as a principal use. The requirements for wall signs for retail - commercial are the same as for all other retail uses in the City. Signage requirements for the office, residential and park uses"re- main the same as in other Mixed Development Districts. o\ . * 6ign.,O.rdinance Amendment. for MDD -6 District Mr. Larsen informed Members of the Commission that at the present time the City of Edina does not have incorporated into its Sign Ordinance regulations for the MDD -6 District (Centennial Lakes). With graphics Mr. Larsen pointed out the proposed requirements. A brief discussion ensued with Commissioner McClelland questioning if signage would be directed toward the park and housing. Mr. Larsen explained that signage facing the housing and park is not being proposed. Commissioner L. Johnson move to recommend approval of the adoption of a Sign Ordinance Amendment for the MDD -6 District. Commissioner Shaw seconded the motion. Ayes: McClelland, Faust, Hale, Shaw, L. Johnson, G. Johnson. Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 451 -A6 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 451 BY ADDING REGULATIONS FOR MIXED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MDD -6 The City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, Ordains: Section 1. Section 5, paragraph (h) (1) of Ordinance No. 451 is hereby amended by adding the following: (d) MDD -6 District: One sign per development not to exceed 100 square feet in-area. For developments with more than one street frontage, one additional sign per street frontage provided each additional sign does not exceed 70 square feet in area. Section 2. Section 5, paragraph (h) is hereby amended by adding the following subparagraphs: (10) Project Identification Signs in MDD -6 District: One freestanding sign for each project per street frontage. The total area of a freestanding sign shall not exceed 50 square feet. (11) Retail Signs: The total area of all wall signs affixed to a building wall shall not exceed 15% of total area of that wall. Section 3. Section 2 of Ordinance No. 451 is hereby amended by adding the following definition: (bb) "Project" 'in the Mixed Development District means a multi- family residential complex containing 10 or more units, a.shopping center or.area, theatre complex containing five or more screens, an office building complex containing three or more buildings, or a public institutional or recreational use. �1 oe��� •'N�bRPOM��v� ieee REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: City Council Members From: John Keprios . . Assistant Director Edina Park and Recreation Date: September 29, 1989 Subject: To reject all VanValkenburg Park lighting, score- board and public address bids... Agenda Item # VT _ B. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Recommend to reject all submitted bids for VanValkenburg Park lighting, scoreboard and public address Info /Background: Due to a complication with the Approved equal clause in the specifications, we recommend to reject all bids in order to adjust specifications for rebid. 11 A. w91�1j`lr oeCn r O • �N�b Iasi$ � �Be@ RBPORWRBCOMMBNDATION To: MAYOR. AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # 3L,—.c From: BOB KOATIN, PARK & Consent ❑ RECREATION DIRECTOR Information Only ❑ Date: SEPTEMBER 29,. 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: AWARD OF BID - ART. ❑ To Council CENTER EXPANSION . Action F-1 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Info /Background: Bids were received and opened_at,2;.00 p.m. on.Thursday, September 28, 1989 for expansion of the.Edina.Art Center. Subsequently, staff and the architect for the project have been negotiating with the low bidder to bring the bid within the amount budgeted for the project. Final figures will not be available until Monday, October- 2. A recommendation will be presented at the.Council Meeting Monday night. j r o REQUEST FOR PURCHASE FrJ ul./ y, TO: City Council Members FROM: Bob Kojetin, Park and Recreation Department, Director VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: October 2, 1989 AGENDA ITEM vI . C ITEM DESCRIPTION: Art Center Expansion Recommend Karkela Const. $217,357 GENERAL INFORMATION: Remodel..and expand Edina Art Center, 4701 W. 64th St. Monies will be obtained frout Developer's Fund- $100,000, Art Center Donations- $ 50,000 Park Capital Improvement Budget- $ 50,000 The Recommended bid is Department Within budget not within, bjjdge# -r:- s Finance Director .(op- eth Rosland 66 Manager COMPANAY BASE BID ALTERNATES NET BID - 1, Karkela Const. $242,247 $ 24,890 $217,357 2. 3. Dean & Assoc. 263,000 29,725 233,275 4. Morcon Const. Paulco,.Inc. 256,400 269,559 22,900 233,500 5. MetCon Metro 272,400 32,953 21,224 236,606 251,176 6. 7. W.H. Cates Gladstone Const. 281,500 282,799 25,736 24,670 255,764 258,129 RECOMMENDED QUOTE 'OR BID: Recommend Karkela Const. $217,357 GENERAL INFORMATION: Remodel..and expand Edina Art Center, 4701 W. 64th St. Monies will be obtained frout Developer's Fund- $100,000, Art Center Donations- $ 50,000 Park Capital Improvement Budget- $ 50,000 The Recommended bid is Department Within budget not within, bjjdge# -r:- s Finance Director .(op- eth Rosland 66 Manager e 0 •' ~�bRPOMt�O Jose REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor and Counci From: John Wallin Finance Dir for Date: October 2, 1989 Subject: Public Hearing and Reso- lution Relating to General Obliga- tion Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1989 Recommendation: Agenda Item # VII & -VII.A — Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Hold public hearing and approve resolution relating to General Obliga- tion Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1989; Authorizing the issuance and providing for the public sale thereof. Info /Background: Attached are the two previous Report /Recommendations concerning an advance refunding of 1985 Tax Increment Bonds. The Report dated September 5, 1989, tells how the advance refunding works. The Report dated September 18, 1989, gives the history of the attempts at refunding this issue as well as the present conditions. These two memos are for background information to facilitate the philosophical discussion called for by some of the Council members at the September 18, 1989 Council meeting. _ A. Cn • RPOW`l�O ieea To: Mayor & Council REPORT /RECOMMENDATION From: John Wallin,�� Finance Di r ctor Date: September 5, 1989 Subject: Set hearing date on advance refunding of 1985 Tax Increment Bonds Agenda Item # x_&_ Consent 0 Information Only ❑ Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action 0 Motion Resolution a ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Set hearing date on advance refunding of 1985 Tax Increment Bonds for October 2, 1989 Info /Background:. In September, 1985 the City issued $12,000,000 of General Obligation Tax Increment. Bonds to finance.'a portion of the HRA's costs relating to the Edinborough project. The Bonds mature from 1989 through 2006 and bear interest at rates ranging from 6.5% for Bonds maturing in 1989 to 9.0% for bonds maturing in 2006. The net interest rate on the Bonds is approx- imately 8.9 %. The Bonds maturing in 1997 and thereafter ($9,700,000 of the principal amount of the Bonds) are callable for redemption at the option.of the City on January 1, 1996. With,lower interest rates, the City could issue a series of advance refunding bonds to refund all or a portion of th&iiBonds and would be able to realize substantial debt service savings..In an advance refunding, the refunded or prior bonds are replaced with the refunding bonds. The prior bonds are "defeased" with the proceeds of the Refunding Bonds which are deposited in an escrow account and invested in federal securities. The escrow is structured so that all of the principal of and interest due on the Prior Bonds until maturity or the call date is paid from the amounts deposited -lin the escrow account and the investment income thereon.. Advance'refundings differ from a typical refinancing since the Prior Bonds remain outstanding and are not paid upon the issueance of the • i Refunding Bonds. This technique allows an issuer to lock in today's rates at a time that the Prior Bonds are not prepayable. In an advance refunding of the City's 1985 Tax Increment Bonds the City would redeem all of the Bonds maturing on or after January 1, 1997 on January 1, 1996. This redemption provision was clearly stated in the form of the Bonds, the Notice of Bond Sale and the Official Statement prepared by the City for distribution to potential purchasers of the Bonds. This redemption provision was taken into account by the purchaser in determing what to bid for the Bonds. The City should not be subject to criticism by holders of the 1985 Tax Increment Bonds whose Bonds are redeemed prior to their maturity date. The benefit to the City of an advance refunding of the 1985 Tax Increment Bonds is debt service .savings. The advance refunding will also lessen the risk that the tax increments from the.District will not be sufficient to pay the general obligation bonds of the City which are payable from the tax increments and that the City would be required to levy taxes to pay this shortfall. Federal law requires that the City hold a public hearing on the issuance. of the Refunding Bonds within one year prior to the date of issuance of the Refunding Bonds..At this point interest rates have fallen far enough to produce the targeted $400,000 of present value savings that the Council determined last year to be the minimum savings that would make a refunding .feasible. With the Council's approval after the public hearing, I would then come back to the Council for approval for the sale of the Refunding Bonds. Y A o e �° REPORT/RECOMMENDATION 9BB To: Mayor and Council From: John Wallin Finance Director Date: September 18, 1989 Subject: Resolution Relating to General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1989 Agenda Item #XIII.k. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Action ❑ Motion Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Approve resolution relating to General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1989; Authorizing the Issuance.and Providing for the Public.Sale Thereof.. Subject to reaffirmation at the previously scheduled October .2, 1989 public hearing. Info /Background: See Attached. Info /Background During the past several years the tax - exempt bond market has experienced substantial changes in interest levels. When the bonds were purchased originally, the net interest cost was 8.9 %. In March of 1987 when the Council first considered refunding the bond issue, the net interest cost was in the area of 6.5 %. This reduction in interest rates was short lived, and before the City could act on it the rates increased substantially. It was then decided to wait until the rates again declined to a rate that would make refunding the bonds feasible. On April 15, 1988, the City Council again held a public hearing on the advance refunding of the 1985 Tax Increment Bonds. This time rates did not fall enough to produce the targeted $400,000 of present value savings that the Council originally determined to be the minimum savings.that would make a refunding feasible. At present, interest rates have fallen and the market demand for municipal bonds is high. One or both of these conditions could change quickly and again the City would have missed an opportunity to realize the $400,000 of targeted present value savings. Therefore, I recommend that the City Council pass the resolution authorizing the issuance and providing for the public sale of General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1989 at the October 16, 1989, City Council meeting. At the:September 5, 1989 Council meeting, a public hearing was called for on October 2, 1989. According to the City's bond counsel, there is no problem in authorizing the issuance and providing for the public sale before the public hearing has been held. The Council may still decide to cancel the sale at the public hearing, or at anytime up to the actual sale of the bonds on October 16, 1989. CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1989 Issuer: City of Edina, Minnesota Governing Body: City Council Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting, held on Monday, September 16, 1989, at 7:00 o'clock p.m. at the City Hall. Members present: Members absent: Documents Attached: Minutes of said meeting (including): RESOLUTION RELATING TO GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1989; AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLIC SALE THEREOF I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting.recording officer of the public corporation issuing the bonds referred to in the title of this certificate, certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of the corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that the documents are a correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of the corporation, and correct and complete copies of all resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents approved by the governing body at the meeting, insofar as they relate to the bonds; that the meeting was duly held by the governing body at the time and place and was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as required by law; and that the above- entitled Resolution has not been amended or repealed as of the date hereof. WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer this day of 1989. Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1989; AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLIC SALE THEREOF BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), as follows:' 11. Authorization. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178 and Chapter 475 the City has issued its General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985 (the Series 1985 Bonds) in the original principal amount of $12,000,000. The Series 1985:Bonds are presently in the amount of $11,850,000. The City presently estimates that it can effect a substantial annual debt service savings by refunding the outstanding bonds described above which are Callable for redemption and prepayment by the City in advance of their maturities in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.67; and the City hereby authorizes the issuance and sale of up to $13,400,0.00 in aggregate principal amount of general obligation refunding bonds, the proceeds of which, together with other available moneys-of the City, shall be used for this purpose, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.52. 2. Terms.of Bonds; Sale Meeting. There has been presented to this Council forms of.the.Terms and Conditions of Sale £or.the Bonds, and a notice of sale for publication, which are attached hereto,:and which are hereby approved and shall be placed on file by the City Clerk. Each and all of the provisions of the Statement of Terms for Receipt of Bids and Award of Sale are hereby adopted as the terms and conditions of the refunding bonds and of the sale thereof; and this Council shall meet.at the time.specified therein for the purpose of considering sealed bids for the purchase of the refunding bonds. 3., Publication of Notice. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause the notice of sale to be published in-the Edina Sun- Current, a legal newspaper of general circulation in.the City, and in Northwestern Financial Review, once not less than ten days before the date of the meeting. 4. Official Statement. The City Finance Director, in cooperation with Public Financial Systems, Inc., financial consultants to the City, is hereby authorized and directed to prepare on behalf of the City an official Statement to be distributed to potential purchasers of the refunding bonds. Such official statement shall contain the Statement of Terms and Conditions for Receipt of Bids and Award of Sale and such other information as shall be deemed advisable and necessary to adequately describe the City and the security for, and terms and conditions of, the refunding bonds. Attest: City Clerk -2- Mayor The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: and the following were opposed: whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. -3- 0 •,KLspuoilaodOad pe;snppV 04 LLim aaiad osv4,und 4041, put 'fug A .'40036 EP aO /pUV Gniwoad 141 'po6u243 � s His Onss i : a4Z 41 @000'M U144 aaow , eq ZOu L jugs Ava�f . e L6u is o u i ;. 0�UV4o ;o WON Wnw4xow 044 pup 000'9196 Penn oZ Zou Zunowv uv Aq LVd0u ;ad 40 WWI 90604662 641 *SIG -136P ao asgoaOUI '01 146i.t e4% ssAaasaa X;0 041 } 000'06011 900 ?. 000`01111 soot 000`09011 .0003 000'069 s66i 000`88011 ti00Z 000`9901t 6661 000'413 9661 000`001'1 tool OOo`s10`t 066T 000`011 c66t 000'08111 8001 000'0901t 061 00049L1 8661 000110~1'1 1001 .000606011 9661 000'281 $ 1661 IMM 7m M : s unOwV Put s,Age,e 6u iMO L L04 641 ui i ,cagnUV� uo �anZVU� LLiM:- puV `sailiA W 6LBuis 10 'JOG-4141 aldMM L0aBa1u� DUI 40 00069$ ;0 SUOiZguiwDuOp UI pup uuol pOaOM BOA SL IN Dui 0q MA iM `6861 `t A9gMA0N; jo It enss i Lru jbpo ;o Opp . v Aveq L L IM spuo8. v41 '9Lti saA ;d040 `s91n;v4S VZoseuuiW jo vu0 plAOad 0.41 4UA oOUVPAO*** % 000'090'11$ 40 ZunOWV Lvdiouiad 54 PUSO M 044 u} `Sg6T jo spuog 1uew6aaui xel U0i4VJ)iLg0 LVaOUOD uia4a93 SuiwsOpaa pu0 6uipunpa 3o esodand e4; JOI panssi eq LL ;M spu08 041 'pe M spuo8 044 pug poPA Mg 4064044 alas 041 'PRA M&A eq Mm spuo8 044 ao; sPiq 041 4014M uodn sUOilipuoO pug swaeZ 6040 IUOW94019 v $i 5141 •811P Owls 044 u0 •w•d oo:L ;p LLIN AM 641.4* PL04 -eq 0% BU MBW s p U014vispisuoa ao Lpun00 Zia 044 0; po;uesead eq LLiM spin 041 'Pe1gl -11414 pug pees ' pouOdo sq MA iM 464% U64M '696T 9 AagWSAON ' ,(VPUOW . ua "WI g 00111 lilun SwOUSS MOUT41 OiLgnd jo $60WO 04% %V POAi936J eq LiMU49V ;M 0119 a4Z) VZoseuuiW 'UM 40 �t110 944 40 (sPUO9 00) 6861 6eiaaS 'spu08 4ueweaou1 x11 uoi�04M RJOUap *000'00'.11S do 0npind 044 ,poi spiq POLIBS vios3NNIN `VNI03 d0 1119 6861 $31135 `SON08 BNIONfU38 1N3W4a3Nt XVI N01101110 NUNN +�000`QOtr`t1� 31: do sNoiitaN09 afro Mai The Bonds maturing in 1997 and subsequent years will each be subject to redemption and prepayment, at the option of the City, in whole or in part and if in part in inverse order of maturities and by lot within a maturity, on January 1 1996 and any interest payment date thereafter, at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. Interest will be parable on July It 1990 and semiannually thereafter on each January 1 and July It to the registered owners of the Bonds appearing of record in the bond register . as of the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month. All Bonds of the same maturity must bear interest from date of original issue until paid at a single, uniform rate, not exceeding.the rate specified for Bonds of any subsequent maturity. Each rate must be expressed in in Integral multiple of 1/8 or 6 /100 of 1%, not exceeding the rate specified for Bonds of any subse• quent maturity. The City will designate and contract with a bank, financial institution or trust COT any to act as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the Registrarr. The Bond Registrar will be kept, principal and interest will be paid to the registered owner of each Bond and transfers of ownership will be effected by the Registrar. The City will pair the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for such services. The City reserves the right to remove the Registrar and appoint a successor. Within 40 days after the sale, the City will deliver to the Registrar the printed Bonds ready for completion and authentication. The original, purchaser of the Bonds must notify the Registrar, at least five business days before delivery of the Bonds, of the ersons in whose names the bonds will be initiallJr registered and the authorized denominations of the Bonds to be originally issued. If notification is not received by that date, the Bonds will be registered in the name of the original purchaser and will be issued in denominations corresponding to -the principal maturities of the Bonds. On the day of closing, the City will. furnish to the purchaser the opinion of bond counsel, hereinefter. described , an arbitrage certification, and a certificate verifying that no litigation in any manner questioning the validity of the Bonds Is then pending or, to the best knowledge of officers of the City, threatened. Payment for the Bonds must be received by the City at its desig- nated depositary on the date of closing in immediately available funds. L QRin= An opinion as to the validity of the Bonds will be furnished by Dorsey & Whitney, of Minneapolis, Minnesota and will be printed on the Bonds. The legal opinion will state that the Bonds are valid and binding general obliga- tions of the City enforceable in accordance with their terms, excspt to the extent to which enforceability may be limited by state or United States laws relating to bankruptcy, reorganization, moratorium or creditors' rights. Sealed bids must be mailed or delivered to the undersigned and must be received prior to the time established above for the opening of bids. Each bid must be unconditional. A good faith deposit in the amount of $268,000 must be submitted with each bid. The good faith deposit must be in the form of a certified or cashiers check or bank draft for immediately available funds. The good faith deposit will be retained by the City as liquidated damages if the bid is accepted and the bidder fails to comply therewith. The good faith deposit will be returned to the purchaser at the-closing for the Gonda. The bid authorizing the lowest net interest cost (total interest from date of Bonds to stated maturities less any cash premium or plus any discount) will be deemed the most favorable. No oral bid and no bid of less than $131140,000 plus accrued interest on all of the Bonds will be considered and the City reserves the right to reject any and 411 bids and to waive any Informality in any bid. The Purchaser of the Bonds will be required as a condition of the sale to execute and Submit to the City as a part of its bid, a Certificate in a form satisfactory to the.City as o.the initial offering price -of the Bonds to the public (not including bond houses and brokers or similar persons or organizations acting in the capacity of underwriters or wholesalers) at which price a substantial amount of the Bond= (not less than ten percent (10% of each maturity) will be sold, and certifying that the prices will not be greater than as shown on the Certificate and that the prices are not unreasonably low. CUSIP Numb` The City will. assume. no obligation for the assignment or printing of CUSIP numbers on the Bondi or for the correctness of any numbers printed thereon, but will permit such numbers to be assigned and painted at the expense of the purchaser, if the purchaser waives any delay in delivery occasioned thereby. Information for bidders and bidding forms may be obtained from the undersi ned or from Public Financial Systems, Inc., 612 Nieollet Hall, Suite 5509 Ain - neapolis, Minnesota, 55402; telephone 612.333 -9177, financial consultants to the City. Dated: October 29 1989. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOTICE OF BOND SALE $13,400,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1989 City of Edina, Minnesota NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that sealed bids for the purchase of $13,400,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1989 of the City of Edina, Minnesota, will be received at the offices of Public Financial Systems .until 11:00 o'clock A.M., Central Time, on Monday, November 6, 1989, at which time the bids will be opened and tabulated. The City Council will meet at 7 :00 P.M. on that same date to consider such bids and award the sale of the Bonds. The Bonds will be dated, as originally issued, November 1, 1989, and will mature on January I in the following years and amounts: Year Amount Year Amount Year Amount 1991 $ 185,000 1997 $1,080,000 2002 $1,120,000 1992 175,000 1998 1,075,000 2003 . 11100,000 1993 220,000 1999 ' 1,065,000 2004 1,085,000 1994 225,000 2000 11050,000 2005 11110,000 1995 500,000 2001 1,140,000 2006 1,090,000 1996 11090,000 The City will select-.a suitable bank or trust company to act as BondRegistrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent. Interest will be payable on each January l and July 1, commencing July 1, 1990, to the registered owners of the Bonds appearing of record in the Bond Register as of the 15th day of the, immediately preceding month. Bonds maturing on January 1, 1997 and thereafter shall be subject to redemption on January 1, 1996, and any interest payment date thereafter, at a price equal to the principal amount thereof.to be redeemed plus accrued interest. A legal opinion on the issue will be furnished -by Dorsey & Whitney, of Minneapolis, Minnesota. The proceeds of the Bonds will be;used to refund certain outstanding tax increment bonds of the City. The City reserves the right to decrease the principal amount of the Bonds by an amount not exceeding $525,000 following opening of the bids, in which event the purchase price will be adjusted proportionately, and to increase or decrease any individual maturity by an amount not to exceed $75,000. Copies of the Terms and Conditions of Sale and r additional information may be obtained from the undersigned or from Public Financial Systems, Inc., 512 Nicollet Mall, Suite 550, Minneapolis, Minnesota .55402; telephone (612) 333 -9177. Dated: September 16, 1989. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PRE - SALE /FINANCE PLAN REPORT REFUNDING 1985 TAX INCREMENT BONDS OCTOBER 2, 1989 PUBLIC FINANCIAL SYSTEMS 512 NICOLLET MALL. SUITE 550 • MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 2739 SECOND AVENUE S.E. • CEDAR RAPIDS. IOWA 52403 TELEPHONE: (612) 333 -9177 FAX: (612) 342 -2547 TELEPHONE: (319) 363 -2221 PUBLIC FINANCIAL SYSTEMS $12 NICOLLET MALL. SUITE 550 • MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 5540. TELEPHONE: (612) 333 -9177 FAX: (612) 342 -2547 MEMORANDUM DATE: October 2, 1989 TO: City Council and Staff City of Edina, Minnesota FROM: Public Financial Systems, Inc. SUBJECT: Advance Refunding of G.O. Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985 Executive Summary /Recommendations 2739 SECOND .AVENUE S.E. • CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA K403 TELEPHONE: (319) 363 -2221 In recent weeks, interest rates on tax - exempt bonds have dropped to levels that approach the low points for this decade. These low interest rates create the potential for issuers to save money through the refinancing of existing debt. Such an opportunity is available to the City of Edina with the G.O. Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1985. PFS has been working with the City Staff since last fall to find the appropriate point to refund this issue. Current market conditions indicate that it is time for the City to act. The City Council is requested to adopt the resolution calling for the sale of bonds. The resolution fixes the details of the transaction as described in this report, calling for the sale of bonds on November 6th. This report explains the concept of refunding and discusses the finance plan for the advance refunding. Explanation of Advance Refunding The process of refinancing municipal bonds is called refunding. In simplest terms, a new bond issue is sold to replace (refund) an existing issue. The term advance applies to the transaction if the refunding is done in advance of the stated maturities and of the redemption provisions found in the bond issue. Typically, bonds cannot be redeemed (prepaid) at any time. Bonds can, however, be paid off prior to maturity on or after some future date, the call date. The gap bewteen today and the call feature makes the refunding process more complicated than simply starting a new bond issue and ending an old one. In an advance refunding, the proceeds of the new bond issue (the "refunding bonds ") are placed in an escrow account and invested in securities of state and local governments (S.L.G.S.). Money in the escrow is sufficient to pay all principal and interest on the old bonds (the "refunded bonds ") until the first call date. At the first call date, the money in the escrow is used to redeem all outstanding bonds. This process legally defeases the refunded bonds and they are no longer an obligation of the issuer. The refunding bonds Page 1 Advance Refunding become the new indebtedness obligation. Th e udbiL duvdnGC re1unu1114 6rd11bdt.biun ib IIIubLr-dLuu m riyuve 1 uCluw. Understanding the Impacts of an Advance Refunding There are two reasons for undertaking an advance refunding: to restructure debt or to create debt service savings. This report will focus on the savings aspects of an advance refunding. The concept of the time value of money is important to properly understanding the amount of savings from the refunding. The advance refunding creates savings because the debt service payments on the refunding bonds are less than on the refunded bonds. The savings occur on future dates as debt service payments are made. The total nominal dollar amount of those savings is called the future value savings. Since a dollar is worth more to you today than it will be tomorrow, by discounting the flow of future savings, we can calculate the value of the savings today. The result of this calculation is called the present value savings. Present value savings is the basic test of the feasibility of an advance refunding. It provides the truest indication of savings. Shifting the time period over which the savings will occur will have a significant impact on future value. The same changes will have only minor influences on present value. The amount of savings needed to make a refunding desireable is subject to both statutory and local tests. Minnesota Statutes requires that an advance refunding achieve a net present value savings of three percent (3%). Even though a refunding meets the basic statutory test, the issuer must consider its own financial management objectives for a refunding. Page 2 The benefit to the City is a function of the impact of the savings. The timing of the savings can be adjusted to fit the financial management needs of the city. The figure on the right illustrates a uniform savings pat- tern. Savings are realized over the life of the bonds. This approach pro- vides some relief in every year the bonds are outstanding. The savings from the refunding can be shifted into one or more of the early years of the bond issue (see Figure 3). This approach helps to meet some im- mediate cash flow needs. Examples of using early savings are tax increment projects where devel- opment has been slow or offsetting the need for rate in- creases on utility projects. Advance Refunding 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 300 250 200 M 150 100 50 0 Figure 2 Illustration of Advance Refunding Uniform Annual Savings LEGEND w Existing Debt New Debt Annual Savings 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 Year Figure 3 Illustration of Advance Refunding Early Savings Annual Savings 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 Year Page 3 LEGEND Existing Debt New Debt The opposite approach is to defer savings as shown in Figure 4. Deferred savings can be used to address a projected future revenue shortfall or to free up resources to be used on a fu- ture financing. Trues of Advance Refundings Advance Refunding Figure 4 Illustration of Advance Refunding Deferred Savings 300 LEGEND Existing Debt 250 , New Debt 200 M c 9, 150 100 Annual savings 50 O 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 1992 1994 1996 1996 2000 Year There are two basic types of advance refundings. A Full Net Defeasance refunding eliminates the existing bonds. The refunding bonds create suffi- cient proceeds to fund the escrow at the level needed to fully defease the existing bonds. This type of refunding is desirable from several perspec- tives. The issuer has the ability to realize immediate benefits from refund- ing. The savings can be structured to occur at any point over the life of the bonds. The refunded bonds appear only as a financial footnote to statements of indebtedness of the issuer. In a Crossover refunding, only the callable bonds are refinanced. The escrow pays interest on the refunding bonds until the first call date and then redeems the refunded bonds. Since the bonds prior to the call date are not refunded, the issuer continues to pay their debt service. At the call date, the issuer's support "crosses over" to the refunding bonds. Crossover refundings frequently create a higher percentage of present value savings. The drawback of this approach is that savings occur only after the call date. In the case of the 1985 Tax Increment Bonds, the savings are deferred until tax year 1996. Either type of refunding results in similar present value savings, the crossover being slightly more efficient. Limits on Advance Refundinas Prior to the Tax Reform Act of 1986, advance refundings were an unlimited resource. Issuers could do refundings as long as they were feasible. The Act limited the number of times that an issue can be advance refunded after 1986 to a maximum of two. Any refundings in excess of two must be done with Page 4 Advance Refunding taxable bonds. This limitation places greater pressure on issuers to careful- ly evaluate the refunding decision. In the case of potentially changing situations (i.e. - tax increment bonds), it may be wise to use one advance refunding for savings and the other for potential restructuring. This finance plan allows the City to capture current savings potential and retain the ability to undertake a future advance refunding. Refunding the 1985 Tax Increment Bonds In 1985, the City sold general obligation tax increment bonds for the purpose of financing a portion of the Edinborough project. Under current market conditions, the advance refunding of the 1985 Bonds is now feasi- ble. Since the issue was sold before the Tax Reform Act, the proposed advance refunding would constitute the first of the City's allowable refundings. This refunding is an ex- cellent example of the use of early savings. The tax increment projections have fallen short of the rev- enue needed to support debt service. The City is currently levying general property taxes to make up the shortfall. Pushing the savings into the early years provides some im- mediate property tax re- lief. Hopefully, it buys some additional time for tax increment producing development to occur. PFS has created a model specifically for the pur- Figure 5 Summary of Refunding Analysis Future Present Savings Value Value Existing Debt $23,083,587 $13,928,337 Proposed Debt (22,051,014)(12,975,033) Cash on Hand 540,000 443,000 Excess Proceeds 4,150 4,150 Total $496,723 $417,454 % of Debt Service 3.00% Year Annual Principal Paid Savings 1990 $118,987 1991 (32,925) 1992 121,577 1993 126,652 1994 120,312 1995 4,113 1996 (3,327) 1997 1,498 1998 (153) 1999 2,040 2000 7,290 2001 6,155 2002 6,855 2003 1,093 2004 (345) 2005 6,735 2006 6,015 pose of analyzing and structuring advance refundings. This model produces an extensive analytical report. A copy of this analysis is appended to this report. The key results of the refunding analysis are summarized in Figure 5. Market Conditions 1988 was an interesting year to follow interest rates on tax - exempt bonds. The Bond Buyer's Index (BBI) was remarkably stable for the year. The BBI is the traditional market indicator for tax - exempt interest rates. The Index is Page 5 Advance Refunding an average of interest rates for 20 year municipal bonds of 20 communities whose average credit rating is "Al". The average BBI for 1988 was very similar to the previous year, 7.68 in 1988 and 7.66 in 1987. However, during 1988, the BBI moved in a very narrow range from a high of 7.97 to a low of 7.33. In comparison, the high for 1987 was 9.17 and the low was 6.54. This trend of consistency has continued into 1989. The BBI began the year with a slight decline, dropping to 7.27 in late January. Interest rates rose during the remainder of first quarter, reaching 7.72. Much of the increase came in short term interest rates. This produced what is called a "flat yield curve" and from time to time, an "inverted yield curve" meaning that short term rates equal or exceed long term rates. Interest rates have been improving over the summer months. In June, the BBI dropped below 7.00 for the first time since early in 1987. The Index has increased slightly in recent weeks. The current BBI is 7.33. We expect that interest rates will come to be favorable over the next few weeks as the City brings its bonds to market. The table on the following page illustrates trends in the BBI since 1982. Issuing Process The key dates in the bond sale process are as follows: October 2 City Council action to set sale October 2 October 13 Official Statement completed Week of October 16 O.S. finalized /printed /distributed Market development November 6 Bond Sale Week of November 27 Estimated closing We have enjoyed serving as your financial advisor and look forward to making this bond issue successful. Respectfully submitted, PUBLIC FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC. Page 6 � .................... BOND BUYERS INDEX •...................� WEEK 1Q 4 1985 1986 1987 1988 1 9.48 9.66 9.87 8.33 6.70 7.83 7.44 2 9.37 9.67 9.60 8.04 6.65 7.83 7.40 3 9.48 9.60 9.51 8.10 6.54 7.61 7.29 4 9.66 9.59 9.21 8.05 6.56 7.51 7.27 5 9.74 9.51 9.37 7.86 6.57 7.49 7.29 6 9.72 9.56 9.52 7.73 6.67 7.40 7.38 7 9.53 9.68 9.64 7.62 6.62 7.55 7.54 8 9.34 9.80 9.71 7.44 6.59 7.52 7.55 9 9.04 9.86 9.71 6.98 6.54 7.47 7.56 10 9.22 9.94 9.75 6.88 6.61 7.67 7.52 11 9.19 9.98 9.76 6.89 6.68 7.75 7.52 12 9.15 10.01 9.82 7.34 6.79 7.89 7.72 13 9.38 9.93 9.75 7.21 6.93 7.90 7.64 14 9.23 10.04 9.63 7.15 7.27 7.80 7.56 15 9.04 9.97 9.39 7.25 7.90 7.81 7.54 16 9.09 9.89 9.25 7.16 7.82 7.87 7.44 17 8.82 9.94 9.39 7.22 7.85 7.77 7.40 18 8.78 9.99 9.37 7.33 7.86 7.84 7.36 19 8.86 10.19 9.11 7.36 7.82 7.85 7.36 20 9.29 10.36 8.86 7.53 8.31 7.97 7.18 21 9.51 10.83 8.91 7.78 8.03 7.96 7.11 22 9.78 11.07 8.81 7.70 7.97 7.87 7.15 23 9.69 10.78 8.60 7.97 7.83 7.78 6.95 24 9.38 10.59 8.66 8.08 7.63 7.73 6.88 25 9.38 10.56 8.69 7.82 7.72 7.77 7.08 26 9.36 10.76 8.80 7.59 7.81 7.74 7.02 27 9.55 10.69 8.82 7.51 7.67 7.75 7.00 28 9.54 10.44 8.81 7.45 7.66 7.77 6.92 29 9.44 10.36 8.73 7.45 7.72 7.77 6.95 30 9.60 10.19 8.87 7.60 7.73 7.76 6.95 31 9.74 9.92 9.01 7.54 7.86 7.69 6.86 32 9.85 9.81 9.02 7.53 7.79 7.83 7.02 33 9.70 10.02 9.12 7.33 7.81 7.85 7.09 34 9.59 10.02 9.18 7.06 7.80 7.80 7.15 35 9.75 10.17 9.09 6.93 8.05 7.76 7.16 36 9.75 10.18 9.07 7.00 8.38 7.67 7.15 37 9.67 10.10 9.26 7.15 8.32 7.59 7.16 38 9.62 9.95 9.35 7.14 8.30 7.62 7.33 39 9.42 10.15 9.38 7.15 8.53 7.64 40 9.46 10.34 9.33 7.19 8.66 7.53 41 9.49 10.36 9.25 7.06 9.17 7.52 42 9.67 10.24 9.12 7.08 8.72 7.45 43 9.68 10.05 8.95 7.11 8.43 7.36 44 9.79 10.11 8.76 6.94 7.90 7.33 45 9.75 10.17 8.68 6.94 8.03 7.44 46 9.70 10.31 8.60 6.92 7.91 7.50 47 9.74 10.24 8.37 6.78 7.96 7.58 48 9.82 10.04 8.51 6.74 7.90 7.66 49 9.91 9.95 8.54 6.77 8.10 7.68 50 10.04 10.00 8.42 6.94 8.01 7.66 51 9.92 9.93 8.38 6.92 7.95 7.57 52 9.76 9.91 8.36 6.83 7.86 7.50 MINIMUM 8.78 9.51 8.36 6.74 6.54 7.33 6.86 MAXIMUM 10.04 11.07 9.87 8.33 9.17 7.97 7.72 AVERAGE 9.51 10.10 9.11 7.34 7.66 7.68 7.26 Page 7 Appendix A - Terms and Conditions Page 9 TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE $13,400,000* GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1989 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Sealed bids for the purchase of $13,400,000* General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1989 (the Bonds) of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) will be received at the offices of Public Financial Systems until 11:00 a.m., on Monday, November 6, 1989, when they will be opened, read and tabu- lated. The bids will be presented to the City Council for consideration at a meeting to be held at the City Hall at 7:00 p.m. on the same date. This is a statement of the terms and conditions upon which the bids for the Bonds will be received, the sale thereof awarded and the Bonds issued. Purpose The Bonds will be issued for the purpose of refunding and redeeming certain General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds of 1985, in the outstanding principal amount of $11,850,000 in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 475. Type. Denomination and Maturities The Bonds will bear a date of original issue as of November 1, 1989, will be in fully registered form and in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof, of single maturities, and will mature on January 1 in the following years and amounts: Year Amount Year Amount Year Amount 1991 $ 185,000 1996 1,090,000 2001 1,140,000 1992 175,000 1997 1,080,000 2002 1,120,000 1993 220,000 1998 1,075,000 2003 1,100,000 1994 225,000 1999 1,065,000 2004 1,085,000 1995 590,000 2000 1,050,000 2005 1,110,000 2006 1,090,000 * The City reserves the right to increase or decrease the aggregate amount of principal by an amount not to exceed $525,000 and the maximum amount of change in any single year shall not be'more than $75,000. If the issue size is changed, the premium and /or discount, if any, and the purchase price will be adjusted proportionately. Redemption The Bonds maturing in 1997 and subsequent years will each be subject to redemption and prepayment, at the option of the City, in whole or in part and if in part in inverse order of maturities and by lot within a maturity, on January 1, 1996 and any interest payment date thereafter, at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. Interest Payment Dates and Rates Interest will be payable on July 1, 1990 and semiannually thereafter on each January 1 and July 1, to the registered owners of the Bonds appearing of record in the bond register as of the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month. All Bonds of the same maturity must bear interest from date of original issue until paid at a single, uniform rate, not exceeding the rate specified for Bonds of any subsequent maturity. Each rate must be expressed in an integral multiple of 1/8 or 5/100 of 1 %, not exceeding the rate specified for Bonds of any subse- quent maturity. Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paving Agent The City will designate and contract with a bank, financial institution or trust company to act as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the Registrar). The Bond Registrar will be kept, principal and interest will be paid to the registered owner of each Bond and transfers of ownership will be effected by the Registrar. The City will pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for such services. The City reserves the right to remove the Registrar and appoint a successor. Delivery Within 40 days after the sale, the City will deliver to the Registrar the printed Bonds ready for completion and authentication. The original purchaser of the Bonds must notify the Registrar, at least five business days before delivery of the Bonds, of the persons in whose names the bonds will be initially registered and the authorized denominations of the Bonds to be originally issued. If notification is not received by that date, the Bonds will be registered in the name of the original purchaser and will be issued in denominations corresponding to the principal maturities of the Bonds. On the day of closing, the City will furnish to the purchaser the opinion of bond counsel hereinafter described, an arbitrage certification and a certificate verifying that no litigation in any manner questioning the validity of the Bonds is then pending or, to the best knowledge of officers of the City, threatened. Payment for the Bonds must be received by the City at its desig- nated depositary on the date of closing in immediately available funds. Legal Opinion An opinion as to the validity of the Bonds will be furnished by Dorsey & Whitney, of Minneapolis, Minnesota and will be printed on the Bonds. The legal opinion will state that the Bonds are valid and binding general obliga- tions of the City enforceable in accordance with their terms, except to the extent to which enforceability may be limited by state or United States laws relating to bankruptcy, reorganization, moratorium or creditors' rights. Type of Bid and Award Sealed bids must be mailed or delivered to the undersigned and must be received prior to the time established above for the opening of bids. Each bid must be unconditional. A good faith deposit in the amount of $268,000 must be submitted with each bid. The good faith deposit must be in the form of a certified or cashiers check or bank draft for immediately available funds. The good faith deposit will be retained by the City as liquidated damages if the bid is accepted and the bidder fails to comply therewith. The good faith deposit will be returned to the purchaser at the closing for the Bonds. The bid authorizing the lowest net interest cost (total interest from date of Bonds to stated maturities less any cash premium or plus any discount) will be deemed the most favorable. No oral bid and no bid of less than $13,140,000 plus accrued interest on all of the Bonds will be considered and the City reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to waive any informality in any bid. The Purchaser of the Bonds will be required as a condition of the sale to execute and submit to the City as a part of its bid, a Certificate in a form satisfactory to the City as to the initial offering price of the Bonds to the public (not including bond houses and brokers or similar persons or organizations acting in the capacity of underwriters or wholesalers) at which price a substantial amount of the Bonds (not less than ten percent (10% of each maturity) will be sold, and certifying that the prices will not be greater than as shown on the Certificate and that the prices are not unreasonably low. CUSIP Numbers The City will assume no obligation for the assignment or printing of CUSIP numbers on the Bonds or for the correctness of any numbers printed thereon, but will permit such numbers to be assigned and printed at the expense of the purchaser, if the purchaser waives any delay in delivery occasioned thereby. Information for bidders and bidding forms may be obtained from the undersigned or from Public Financial Systems, Inc., 512 Nicollet Mall, Suite 550, Min- neapolis, Minnesota, 55402; telephone 612 - 333 -9177, financial consultants to the City. Dated: October 2, 1989. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Appendix B - Refunding Analysis 27- Sep -89 City of Edina, Minnesota Refunding Tax increment 1985 - 3% Savings Rate SOURCES NEW BOND ISSUE - PAR $12,975,000.00 DEBT SERVICE LESS - DISCOUNT (181,650.00) BOND YEARS PLUS - PREMIUM 0.00 8.754% PLUS - ACCRUED INTEREST 0.00 AVG. MATURITY CASH ON HAND 540,000.00 ................ 10.435 PRINCIPAL $13,333,350.00 PRINCIPAL USES S.L.G.S. $13,296,300.00 OTHER SECURITIES 0.00 6.862% EXPENSES 32,900.00 T.I.C. INSURANCE 0.00 SINKING FUND DEPOSIT: ACCRUED INTEREST 0.00 EXCESS PROCEEDS 4,150.00 ................ $13,333,350.00 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa FUTURE PRESENT SAVINGS ....... VALUE ................ VALUE EXISTING DEBT 523,083,587.50 ............... . $13,928,337.54 PROPOSED DEBT (•) (22,051,014.58) (12,975,033.59) CASH ON HAND (•) (540,000.00) (540,000.00) ACCRUED INTEREST 0.00 0.00 EXCESS PROCEEDS 4,150.00 ................ ................ 4,150.00 $496,722.92 $417,453.95 % OF DEBT SERVICE 3.00% EXISTING DEBT SERVICE ........................... PROPOSED ................................. DEBT SERVICE BOND YEARS 128325 BOND YEARS 135393 AVG. COUPON 8.754% AVG. COUPON 6.703% AVG. MATURITY 10.829 AVG. MAT. 10.435 PRINCIPAL $11,850,000 PRINCIPAL $12,975,000 A.N.I.R. 6.838% ADJ. MIR 6.862% T.I.C. 6.6865 % T.I.C. TEST PROPOSED DEBT: TOTAL PURCHASE PRICE PRESENT VALUE AT: VARIANCE UNRECOVERABLE EXPENSES $12,975,000 6.687% 12,975,034 .... ........... (534) Prepared By: PUBLIC FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC. (27-Sep-89 ) 27- Sep -89 PAGE 2 City of Edina, Minnesota Refunding Tax Increment 1985 - 3% Savings Rate ........................ .. EXISTING DEBT SERVICE ......................................... Prepared By: PUBLIC FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC. (27-Sep-89 ) INTEREST TOTAL PRINCIPAL P 8 I DATE PRINCIPAL RATE INTEREST P 8 I TO CALL TO CALL 01 -Jan -90 $150,000 6.750 5508,987.50 5658,987.50 $150,000 5658,987.50 01 -Jul -90 503,925.00 503,925.00 0 503,925.00 01- Jan -91 150,000 7.100 503,925.00 653,925.00 150,000 653,925.00 01- Jul -91 498,600.00 498,600.00 0 498,600.00 O1- Jan -92 150,000 7.300 498,600.00 648,600.00 150,000 648,600.00 01- Jul -92 493,125.00 493,125.00 0 493,125.00 01- Jan -93 200,000 7.600 493,125.00 693,125.00 200,000 693,125.00 01- Jul -93 485,525.00 485,525.00 0 485,525.00 01 -Jan -94 200,000 7.800 485,525.00 685,525.00 200,000 685,525.00 01- Jul -94 477,725.00 477,725.00 0 477,725.00 01 -Jan -95 400,000 8.000 477,725.00 877,725.00 400,000 877,725.00 01 -Jul -95 461,725.00 461,725.00 0 461,725.00 01- Jan-96 900,000 8.100 461,725.00 1,361,725.00 10,600,000 11,061,725.00 01-Ju1-96 425,275.00 425,275.00 0 0.00 01- Jan -97 900,000 8.250 425,275.00 1,325,275.00 0 0.00 01- Jul -97 388,150.00 388,150.00 0 0.00 01- Jan -98 900,000 8.400 388,150.00 1,288,150.00 0 0.00 01 -Jul -98 350,350.00 350,350.00 0 0.00 01 -Jan -99 900,000 8.600 350,350.00 1,250,350.00 0 0.00 01 -Jul -99 311,650.00 311,650.00 0 0.00 01- Jan - 2000 900,000 8.700 311,650.00 1,211,650.00 0 0.00 01 -Jul -2000 272,500.00 272,500.00 0 0.00 01 -Jan-2001 1,000,000 8.800 272,500.00 1,272,500.00 0 0.00 01- Jul - 2001 228,500.00 228,500.00 0 0.00 01- Jan-2002 1,000,000 8.900 228,500.00 1,228,500.00 0 0.00 01 -Jul -2002 184,000.00 184,000.00 0 0.00 01-Jan -2003 1,000,000 8.900 184,000.00 1,184,000.00 0 0.00 01- Jul -2003 139,500.00 139,500.00 0 0.00 01- Jan-2004 1,000,000 9.000 139,500.00 1,139,500.00 0 0.00 01- Jul - 2004 94,500.00 94,500.00 0 0.00 01 -Jan-2005 1,050,000 9.000 94,500.00 1,144,500.00 0 0.00 01- Jul -2005 47,250.00 47,250.00 0 0.00 01- Jan-2006 1,050,000 9.000 47,250.00 1,097,250.00 0 0.00 01- Jul -2006 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 01- Jan-2007 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 01- Jul -2007 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 01-Jan-2008 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 01- Jul -2008 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 01- Jan-2009 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 01- Jul -2009 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 01- Jan-2010 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 01- Jul -2010 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 01- Jan-2011 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 01- Jul -2011 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 01 -Jan-2012 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 01- Jul -2012 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 01 -Jan-2013 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 01- Jul -2013 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 01- Jan-2014 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 01- Ju1-2014 ............ 0.00 -------- 0.00 0 0.00 $11,850,000 - ----- $11,233,587.50 .............. .............. $23,083,587.50 $11,850,000 .............. $18,200,237.50 Prepared By: PUBLIC FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC. (27-Sep-89 ) 27- Sep -89 PAGE 3 City of Edina, Minnesota Refunding Tax Increment 1985 - 3% Savings Rate Prepared By: PUBLIC FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC. (27-Sep-89 ) ............... PROPOSED DEBT SERVICE --------------. - -- DATED: 01-Nov-89 INTEREST P g 1 DATE PRINCIPAL RATE INTEREST NEW DEBT 01 -Jan -90 6.100 $0.00 $0.00 01 -Jul -90 574,728.33 574,728.33 01- Jan -91 185,000 6.200 431,046.25 616,046.25 01- Jul -91 425,311.25 425,311.25 01- Jan -92 175,000 6.300 425,311.25 600,311.25 01- Ju1-92 419,798.75 419,798.75 01-Jan-93 220,000 6.300 419,798.75 639,798.75 01-Ju1 -93 412,868.75 412,868.75 01- Jan-94 225,000 6.400 412,868.75 637,868.75 01-Jul -94 405,668.75 405,668.75 01 -Jan -95 540,000 6.400 405,668.75 945,668.75 01 -Jul -95 388,388,75 388,388,75 01- Jan -96 1,050,000 6.450 388,388.75 1,438,388.75 01- Jul -96 354,526.25 354,526.25 01- Jan -97 1,040,000 6.500 354,526.25 1,394,526.25 01- Jul -97 320,726.25 320,726.25 01- Jan-98 1,035,000 6.550 320,726.25 1,355,726.25 01 -Jul -98 286,830.00 286,830.00 01- Jan -99 1,025,000 6.600 286,830.00 1,311,830.00 01 -Jul -99 253,005.00 253,005.00 01- Jan -2000 1,010,000 6.650 253,005.00 1,263,005.00 01 -Jul -2000 219,422.50 219,422.50 01- Jan -2001 1,100,000 6.700 219,422.50 1,319,422.50 01 -Jul -2001 182,572.50 182,572.50 01 -Jan -2002 1,085,000 6.750 182,572.50 1,267,572.50 01- Jul -2002 145,953.75 145,953.75 01- Jan -2003 1,075,000 6.750 145,953.75 1,220,953.75 01- Jul -2003 109,672.50 109,672.50 01- Jan -2004 1,060,000 6.800 109,672.50 1,169,672.50 01- Jul - 2004 73,632.50 73,632.50 01 -Jan -2005 1,085,000 6.800 73,632.50 1,158,632.50 01- Jul - 2005 36,742.50 36,742.50 01- Jan -2006 1,065,000 6.900 36,742.50 1,101,742.50 01- Ju1-2006 0.00 0.00 01 -Jan -2007 0.00 0.00 01- Jul -2007 0.00 0.00 01- Jan -2008 0.00 0.00 01- Jul -2008 0.00 0.00 01- Jan -2009 0.00 0.00 01 -Jul -2009 0.00 0.00 01 -Jan -2010 0.00 0.00 01- Jul -2010 0.00 0.00 01- Jan -2011 0.00 0.00 01-Ju1 -2011 0.00 0.00 01- Jan -2012 0.00 0.00 01- Jul -2012 0.00 0.00 01 -Jan -2013 0.00 0.00 01- Jul -2013 0.00 0.00 01- Jan -2014 0.00 0.00 01- Jul -2014 ........ ...... 0.00 0.00 $12, 975,000 .............. $9,076,014.58 ............ -- $22,051,014.58 Prepared By: PUBLIC FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC. (27-Sep-89 ) 27- Sep -89 PAGE 4 City of Edina, Ninnesota - 3% Savings Rate Refunding Tax Increment 1985 - 3% Savings Rate ........................ SAVINGS ..... ............................... P & I P & I ANNUAL ANNUAL NEW DEBT OLD DEBT SAVINGS SAVINGS NEW DEBT DATE $0.00 $658, 987.50 5658,987.50 $658,987.50 $0.00 O1- Jan -90 574,728.33 503,925.00 (70,803.33) 01 -Jul -90 616,046.25 653,925.00 37,878.75 (32,924.58) 1,190,774.58 01- Jan -91 425,311.25 498,600.00 73,288.75 01- Jul -91 600,311.25 648,600.00 48,288.75 121,577.50 1,025,622.50 01- Jan -92 419,798.75 493,125.00 73,326.25 01 -Jul -92 639,798.75 693,125.00 53,326.25 126,652.50 1,059,597.50 01- Jan -93 412,868.75 485,525.00 72,656.25 01- Jut-93 637,868.75 685,525.00 47,656.25 120,312.50 1,050,737.50 01- Jan -94 405,668.75 477,725.00 72,056.25 01- Jul -94 945,668.75 877,725.00 (67,943.75) 4,112.50 1,351,337.50 01 -Jan -95 388,388.75 461,725.00 73,336.25 01 -Jul -95 1,438,388.75 1,361,725.00 (76,663.75) (3,327.50) 1,826,777.50 01- Jan -96 354,526.25 425,275.00 70,748.75 01 -Jul -96 1,394,526.25 1,325,275.00 (69,251.25) 1,497.50 1,749,052.50 01- Jan -97 320,726.25 388,150.00 67,423.75 01- Jul -97 1,355,726.25 1,288,150.00 (67,576.25) (152.50) 1,676,452.50 01- Jan -98 286,830.00 350,350.00 63,520.00 01- Jul -98 1,311,830.00 1,250,350.00 (61,480.00) 2,040.00 1,598,660.00 O1 -Jan -99 253,005.00 311,650.00 58,645.00 01 -Jul -99 1,263,005.00 1,211,650.00 (51,355.00) 7,290.00 1,516,010.00 01 -Jan -2000 219,422.50 272,500.00 53,077.50 01- Jul -2000 1,319,422.50 1,272,500.00 (46,922.50) 6,155.00 1,538,845.00 01 -Jan -2001 182,572.50 228,500.00 45,927.50 01- Jul -2001 1,267,572.50 1,228,500.00 (39,072.50) 6,855.00 1,450,145.00 01- Jan -2002 145,953.75 184,000.00 38,046.25 01- Jul -2002 1,220,953.75 1,184,000.00 (36,953.75) 1,092.50 1,366,907.50 01- Jan -2003 109,672.50 139,500.00 29,827.50 01- Jul -2003 1,169,672.50 1,139,500.00 (30,172.50) (345.00) 1,279,345.00 01- Jan -2004 73,632.50 94,500.00 20,867.50 01- Jut -2004 1,158,632.50 1,144,500.00 (14,132.50) 6,735.00 1,232,265.00 01- Jan -2005 36,742.50 47,250.00 10,507.50 01- Jut -2005 1,101,742.50 1,097,250.00 (4,492.50) 6,015.00 1,138,485.00 01- Jan -2006 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 -Jul -2006 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01- Jan -2007 0.00 0.00 0.00 01- Jul -2007 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01- Jan -2008 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 -Jul -2008 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01- Jan -2009 0.00 0.00 0.00 01- Jut -2009 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01- Jan -2010 0.00 0.00 0.00 01- Jul -2010 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01- Jan -2011 0.00 0.00 0.00 01- Jul -2011 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O1- Jan -2012 0.00 0.00 0.00 01- Jul -2012 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01- Jan -2013 0.00 0.00 0.00 01- Jul -2013 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01- Jan -2014 0.00 -------- - - - --- 0.00 .............. 0.00 01 -Jut -2014 $22,051,014.58 $23,083,587.50 .............. $1,032,572.92 .............. $1,032,572.92 .............. $22,051,014.58 Prepared By: PUBLIC FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC. (27-Sep -89 ) 27-Sep-89 PAGE 5 City of Edina, Minnesota Refunding Tax Increment 1985 - 3% Savings Rate Ifed85f) INPUTS aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa= aaaaaaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ENTER DATA: - >- >- >- >- > - >• > -> OLD DEBT <- <- <- <- <- < - <• <- PR1NC.(000) $0 RATE(X) 0 PRICE (100) $0.00 COST (CALL.) $0 ..................................................... UNRESTRICTED FIRST SECOND CALL CALL (Expenses Included) DATE ..... DATE DATE FACTOR MONTH S 1 ...... 7 - - -- 1 ...... 100 DAY OF MONTH 1 1 1 PAR =100 YEAR 000 .................................. 90 90 .. ....... 96 YEAR (XX) 1 . >- >- >- >- >-> NEU BONDS .••-- --••-------- <•<- < -< -<- - -... Rating 1ST 1NT DATED CLOSING DATE DATE DATE MONTH 9 ....... 7 • -- -- 11 ....... 11 DAY OF MONTH 1 1 1 YEAR 000 90 89 89 ..---•---------•-------------------------------------•----------- UNRESTRICTED SECURITY A: MATURITY 1ST PAYMENT PRIOR PMT DATE OF SECURITY OF SECURITY MONTH * ........ t ........... 1 ........... 1 DAY OF MONTH 1 1 1 YEAR 000 1 1 1 PR1NC.(000) $0 RATE(X) 0 PRICE (100) $0.00 COST (CALL.) $0 ..................................................... UNRESTRICTED 6.6665 X SECURITY B: (Expenses Included) PREMIUM (S /1000) $0.00 Legal MATURITY IST PAYMENT PRIOR PMT DATE OF SECURITY OF SECURITY MONTH S 1 1 1 DAY OF MONTH 1 t 1 YEAR (XX) 1 1 1 PRINC.(000) $0 RATE(X) 0 PRICE (100) $0.00 COST (CALC.) s0 PRESENT VALUE RATE 6.6665 X (Expenses Included) PREMIUM (S /1000) $0.00 Legal DISCOUNT (S /1000) $14.00 Fiscal Sp Cans EXPENSES (S) $32,900 Off Start Bonds INSURANCE-S1000 DEBT SERVICE 50.00 Escrow TRANSFERRED PROCEEDS ADJ. $0 Verif RESTRICTED CASH DEPOSIT (S) 5540,000 Rating -------------•------.....------••- ------........-----...------ Misc. -- rat :f�r��fw� **s�� *3*w+sf� *wsstrft COPYRIGHT (C) PUBLIC FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC. (1983) �+* �+, rs� *fs,r�s�fi��f *� *�s*r�,t�wt,►�N Prepared By: PUBLIC FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC. (27-Sep-89 ) 27- Sep -89 PAGE 6 City of Edina, Minnesota Prepared By: PUBLIC FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC. (27-Sep -89 ) Refunding Tax Increment 1985 - 32 Savings Rate ............ . .. PRESENT VALUE CALCULATIONS ................... 6.6865 % REDUCED PRES.VAL. PRES. VAL. PRES. VAL. ESCROW REDUCED DATE OLD DEBT NEW DEBT REQUIREMENT REQUIREMENT 01- Jan -90 $651, 803.18 $0.00 5658,987.50 $651,803.18 01 -Jul -90 482,306.47 550,072.31 503,925.00 482,306.47 01- Jan -91 605,623.90 570,543.00 653,925.00 605,623.90 01- Ju1-91 446,832.98 381,153.42 498,600.00 446,832.98 01- Jan -92 562,454.99 520,579.80 648,600.00 562,454.99 01- Jul -92 413,795.48 352,265.30 493,125.00 413,795.48 01- Jan -93 562,805.28 519,505.31 693,125.00 562,805.28 01- Jul -93 381,483.79 324,396.75 485,525.00 381,483.79 01-Jan-94 521,201.51 484,968.69 685,525.00 521,201.51 01 -Jul -94 351,461.88 298,450.16 477,725.00 351,461.88 01- Jan -95 624,851.20 673,220.26 877,725.00 624,851.20 01 -Jul -95 318,067.59 267,548.59 461,725.00 318,067.59 01- Jan -96 907,702.06 958,804.77 11,061,725.00 7,373,552.35 01- Ju1-96 274,310.01 228,675.79 0.00 0.00 01- Jan-97 827,171.73 870,394.97 0.00 0.00 01- Jul -97 234,426.74 193,705.55 0.00 0.00 01 -Jan -98 752,821.28 792,314.23 0.00 0.00 01- Ju1-98 198,127.82 162,206.37 0.00 0.00 01-Jan -99 664,215.36 717,858.38 0.00 0.00 01 -Jul -99 165,023.67 133,970.20 0.00 0.00 01- Jan - 2000 620,832.11 647,145.68 0.00 0.00 01- Ju1-2000 135,108.10 108,791.77 0.00 0.00 01- Jan -2001 610,506.86 633,018.85 0.00 0.00 01- Jul -2001 106,080.81 84,759.04 0.00 0.00 01 -Jan -2002 551,878.77 569,431.30 0.00 0.00 01- Jul - 2002 79,984.21 63,445.62 0.00 0.00 01 -Jen -2003 498,030.57 513,574.57 0.00 0.00 01 -Jul- 2003 56,780.13 44,639.56 0.00 0.00 01- Jan -2004 448,801.60 460,685.29 0.00 0.00 01- Jul - 2004 36,015.53 28,062.57 0.00 0.00 01- Jan -2005 422,076.95 427,288.83 0.00 0.00 01- Jul -2005 16,861.47 13,111.80 0.00 0.00 01- Jan -2006 378,893.53 380,444.85 0.00 0.00 01- Jul -2006 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01- Jan -2007 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01- Jul -2007 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01- Jan -2008 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01- Jul -2008 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01-Jan -2009 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01- Jul -2009 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 -Jan -2010 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01- Jul -2010 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 -Jan -2011 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 -Jul -2011 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01- Jan-2012 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01- Jul -2012 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 -Jan -2013 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01- Jul -2013 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 -Jan -2014 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01- Jul -2014 0.00 -------- - - - 0.00 0.00 0.00 - -- $13,928,337.54 .............. $12,975,033.59 .............. $18,200,237.50 .............. $13,296,240.60 Prepared By: PUBLIC FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC. (27-Sep -89 ) OCT 10 '89 14 :0E DORSEY & WHITNEY MINNEAPOLIS P.1 DORSEYC WHITNEY • A r�M7,��•�U (MLVa,w i1AAi�lM�� G��V7tY„■ 2800 FIRST BANK FLACK EAST KINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 85408 ( 619) 340.8600 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET DEX6100 (612)'340 -2868 RAPICOM 205 (612).340 -2768 DATE; October 10•_ „ -19 8 9 TIME: TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET): 3 TO: Ms. Marcella Daehn FIRM NAME: City of Edina LOCATION: _ Edina, MN FACSIMILE NUMBER. 927 -5032 TELEPHONE NUMBER (TO CONFIRM RECEIPT OF MATERIAL): FROM: Jerome P. Gilligan TELEPHONE NUMBER: 340 -2962 COMMENTS: 927 -8861 PLEASE CONTACT FACSIMILE OPERATOR Cathy AT (612) 340.2872 IF TRANSMISSION IS INCOMPLETE OR CANNOT BE READ. WAimritan 01(ke Pm tam 341.2002 186810 f OCT 10 '89 14 :06 DORSE'Y & WHITNEY MINNEAPOLIS Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS; AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE THEREOF BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), as follows: P.2 1. Authorization. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178 and.Chapter 475 the City has issued its General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985 (the Series 1985 Bonds) in the original principal amount of $12,000,000. The Series 1985 Bonds are presently in the amount of $11,850,000. The City presently estimates that it can effect a substantial annual debt service savings by refunding the outstanding bonds described above which are callable for redemption and prepayment by the City in advance of their maturities in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.67; and the City hereby authorizes the issuance and sale of up to $13,400,000 in aggregate principal amount of general obligation refunding bonds (the Bonds), the proceeds of which, together with other available moneys of the City, shall be used for this purpose, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.52. 2. Terms of Bonds; Sale Date. The City Manager is hereby authorized to set a sale date for the Bonds at such time as it is expected that the present value of the debt service on the Bonds is at least $400,000 less than the debt service on the Series 1985 Bonds to be refunded, all as computed in accordance with Section 475.67, subdivision 12. At such sale date this Council shall meet for the purpose of approving the terms of the Bonds and considering bids for the purchase thereof. Attest: _ City Clerk Mayor OCT 10 '39 14 :0' DORSEY & WHITNEY MINNEAPOLIS The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: and the following were opposed: whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. -2- P.3 oe` Cn �* • •'N�HPOMZbv� �eeB REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER Agenda Item # VIII From. MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date. SEPTEMBER 29, 2989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject. ON -SALE WINE LICENSE FEES ❑X To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution 51 Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Approval of proposed increase in on -sale wine license fees. Info /Background: Following the advisory poll submitted to the voters in November,.1984, the Council adopted an ordinance to allow sales of wine only in qualifying restaurants. The first licenses were issued in September, 1985. The license fees for on -sale wine licenses have remained at the same level since inception. An increase is recommended for 1990 to recoup increased costs for staff time spent in issuance of the licenses and inspections required by ordinance. 1989 Proposed 1990 On -Sale Wine: 50 or less seats .$550 $600 50 - 100 seats 600 650 101 - 150 seats 650 700 Over 150 seats 700 750 Manager's license 50 55 1 Antonio Cecconi's. B � Rr =: A�V=-- (1) a? Ristorante Italiano 3910.West 50th Street - Edina, MN - 55424 - (612) 922 -5815 City of Edina 4801 Wes:: 50th Street Edina MN 55424 September 25, 1989 RE: Fee increase for on -sale wine licenses Since I will be unable to attend the October 2 meeting I would like to express my opinion on this matter. The taxes, insurance, current license:-fees and operating costs we must pay to keep our business operational are very high. In a.very competitive business, we must fight for every consumer dollar. Increasing wine license fees only make it more difficult for the individual owner- operators. Edina already has the reputation of being "hard-to get" in the wine license for.rest aurants. Why increase fees and make it harder to maintain a restaurant in Edina? Sincerelv. Antonio Cecconi eA e '�' t,4 \N�b less REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER Agenda Item # x.A From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK . Consent a Information Only ❑ Date: SEPTEMBER 28, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: PETITION FOR VACATION OF To Council OLD COUNTY ROAD RIGHT.OF WAY Action ❑Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adoption of a resolution setting November 6, 1989 as hearing date for the vacation of 'Old County Road" right of way on the Leo Evans property. Info /Background: A petition has been filed with the City requesting vacation of right of way for 'Old County Road" on the Leo Evans property, generally located south of Vernon Avenue and east of Olinger Road. A hearing date of November 6, I989 is recommended to allow time for the required publication and mailing of notices to adjacent property owners and utility companies. o e AA \�N�bRPOZ:r5 iBBB REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor and Council Agenda Item # TX _ A From: John Wallin �. Consent F-] Finance Dir ctor Information Only ❑ Date: October 2, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Fees and Charges To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance E Discussion Recommendation: Discussion regarding proposed 1990 Fees and Charges for approval at the October 16, 1989 Council Meeting. Info /Background: See attached General Fund Fees and Charges and Enterprise Fees and Charges. CITY OF EDINA FEES AND CHARGES FEE NO. FEES 1989 1990 NO. OF PERMITS FEES REVENUE NO. OF PERMITS FEE REVENUE SIRE SPRINKLER PERMIT: 22.1a-22.1e SPRINKLER PERMIT 300 40 - 300 300 40 - 300 22.1f FIRE PUMP INSTALL 75 75 22.tg -22.1h STAND PIPE INSTALL 75 22,000 75 22,000 GAS PUMP, TANK & MM: 21 -21b SPECIAL HAZARD 180 25 - 100 200 25 - 100 50 GREASE VENT 75 35 75 35 FIRE ALARM SYST 25 40 - 300 30 40 - 300 22 FIRE EXT SERV 28 15 3,000 25 15 3,000 . 22a FALSE ALARMS 30 175 5,000 30 175 5,000 AMBULANCE: LEVEL 1 1,400 60 1,400 60 LEVEL II 245 255 LEVEL III 295 305 LEVEL IV 345 355 LEVEL V 395 365,000 405 375,000 CODE COMPLIANCE 35 75 40 75 ASSESSING SPEC. ASSESSMENT SEARCH 2,500 10 25,000 1300 10 13,000 PLANNING 19a SIGN PERMIT 110 50 5,500 110 50 5,500 PLANNING FEES: 28b SUBDIVISION 8 225 + S5 /LOT 7 225 + S5 /LOT 29b -d REZONING 3 3.00 -600 3 300 -600 29e WAREHOUSE SALE 4 300 4 300 29f COND USE PERMIT 1 5,000 1 5,000, FINAL DEVL PLAN 5 200 5 350 28a LOT DIVISION 8 20 7- 30 28c DEVELOPER FEE /PLAN A 6.5% TOTAL COST 29a VARIANCE 40 50 - 100 40 75 -.150 LANDSCAPING 10 N/A 10 100 31 VACATION APPLICATIONS 7 75 13,000 6 75 13,000 BOWLING, TAXI A PINBALL: CITY CLERK PUBLIC DANCE 4 BOWLING ALLEY LIC 2 KART TRACK LICENSE 0 BINGO 8 GAMBLING 2 MECH AMUSE DEVICE 81 THEATRE LICENSE 3 BENCH COURTESY SIGNS 59 LOUDSPEAKER PERMIT 15 PARKING PERMIT N/A REFUND ON STICKER N/A SOLICITOR 20 MOTOR BIKE LICENSE N/A RENTING MOTOR BIKE. N/A TAXI DRIVER 0 BUSINESS MASSAGE LICENS O INDIV. MASSAGE LICENSE 6 INDIV. FEE - INDIV. LIC. 2 INDIV. FEE-BUSINESS LIC 0 TAXICAB 100 FALSE ALARM 480 DOG 8 IMPOUNDING FEES: 0 IMPOUNDING: 50 DAILY CARE 90 FIRST OFFENSE /YR 130 SECOND OFFENS /YR 4 THIRD OFFENSE /YR 1 DISPOSAL 8 DOG LICENSE 80 NEUTERED LICENSE 300 DUPLICATE LICENSE 10 KENNEL LICENSE 0 DOG LICENSE RENEWAL 40 DOG LICENSE RENEW S/N 140 35 CITY CLERK 35 BEER 8 LIQUOR: 36a SUNDAY LIQUOR LICENSE 36b ON -SALE LIQUOR 36c' ON -SALE BEER RENEL 36c -1 ON -SALE BEER NEW 36d OFF-SALE BEER RENW 36d -1 OFF -SALE BEER NEW 36f TEMP LIQUOR LICENSE 50 ON -SALE WINE: 36g 50 OR < SEATS 369 51 - 100 SEATS 36g 101 - 150 SEATS 2 /MONTH OVER 150 SEATS 36h MANAGERS LICENSE 35 4 35 35 + $10/LANE 2 35 + 810 /LANE 5 /KART OR 40 0 5 /KART OR 40 35 2 35 5 - 35 81 5 - 35 100 3 100 50 59 50 5 15 5 2 /MONTH N/A 2 /MONTH 2 /MONTH N/A 2 /MONTH 35 20 35 50 N/A 50 100 N/A 100 35 0 35 200 0 200 50 6 50 50 2 50 1,500 0 1,500 35 10,000 100 35 75 36,000 480 75 7 100 7 25 140 25 50 4 50 100 1. 100 10 8 10 20 100 20 7 300 7 1 10 1 50 0 50 6 50 6 3 10,000 150 3 2 200 2 200 2 -650 2 650 18 165 18 175 0 220 0 230 6 165 6- 175 0 220 0 230 1 35 1 35 0 550 0 600 2 600 2 650 4 650 4 700 2 700 2 750 32 50 16,000 32 55 12,000 36,000 10,000 16,000 • HEALTH POOL & SPA: INDOOR SWIM POOL 30 250 30 250 OUTDOOR SWIM POOL 25 135 25 135 18 WHIRLPOOL 10 55 11,000 10 55 11,000 FOOD 8 SOFT DRINKS: 23 SEWAGE DISPOSAL STS. 0 25 0 25 24a MILK PLANT OPERATION 0 100 0 100 MILK PRODUCTION & DISTR: 24b EACH TRUCK 0 10 0 10 24c > FIVE TRUCKS 0 50 0 50 25a FOOD ESTABLISHMENT 70 345 75 345 ADDED FACILITY 5 85 5 85 25a1 TAKE OUT FOOD 5 230 5 230 25a2 PACKAGED FOOD 4 110 4 110 25x3 FOOD WHAREHOUSE 2 50 2 50 25a4 CATERING FOOD EST 3 345 3 345 ADDED FACILITY 0 85 0 85 25b ITINERANT FOOD EST 20 50 20 50 25c RETAIL CANDY SHOP 10 35 10 35 25d READY PERISH FOOD 20 55 20 55 25e FLEET OF 5 OR MORE 0 275 0 275 25f BAKERY VEHICLE 0 50 0 50 25g CATERING VEHICLE 0 130 0 130 ADDED VEHICLE 0 15 0 15 25h. PARISHABLE FOOD 5, 55 5 55 25i FLEET OF 5 OR MORE 0 275 0 275 25j FOOD VENDING MACH 500 15 500 15 ?Sp ICE VENDING MACH 0 10 0 10 PKG ICE 2 20 2 20 FOOD EST PLAN 2 100% LICNS FEE 3 100% LICNS FEE 251 -1 FOOD EST PLAN REMO 4 50% LICNS FEE 5 50% LICNS FEE 26 FUMIGATING PERMIT 0 12 0 . 12 HOTEL LICENSE 27a 50 OR < ROOMS: 0 150 0 150 27a OVER 50 ROOMS 0 $1/ ADDED ROOM 0 $1/ ADDED ROOM 27b LODGING LICENSE 0 55 39,000 0 55 41,000 SCAVENGER & GARBAGE COLLECTORS: 41 GARBAGE HAULER 10 75 15 75 ADDED VEHICLE 20 30 20 30 42a SCAVENGER LIC 0 25 0 25 RENEWAL 0 15 0 15 420 SCAVERGER PERMIT 5 20 1,800 5 20 1,800 45a -45b CIGARETTE VENDING 85 12 1,700 85— 12 1,500 CESSPOOL & SEWER 0 20 500 0 20 500 900 BUILDING 900 BUILDING PERMITS -9i BUILDING PERMITS 0 CODE COMPLIANCE INSP Ala MOVING OF BLDGS. 11b INDEMNITY FOR DAMAGES 12 INSTALLER'S LICENSE 13a GASFITTING LICENSE 13b WATER COND. INSTAL. 20 CONSTRUCT /ALTER WELL 30 RADIO 8 TV ANTENNAS 31 STREET EXCAVATION 33 PRIVATE EXCAVATION 34 MINING /STRIPPING 0 PLUMBING: 14a EACH FIXTURE 14b ROUGH-IN FIXTURE 14c SETTING FIXTURES 14d BEER DISPENSER 14e BLOW OFF BASIN 14f CATCH BASIN 14g ELEC WATER HEATER 14h HYDRAULIC VALVE 14i MANHOLES 14j NEW GROUND RUN 14k ROOF DRAINS 14L SUMP TANK 14m WATER SOFTENER 14n EXTEND WATER LINES SEWER WATER 14r INSTALL WATER MTR TAPS: 14s 3/4" 14t 1" 140 INSTALL RP2 BACKFLOW 14t2 INSPECT RP2 ROAD REPAIR: 14Y BLACKTOP 14w CONCRETE GAS: 14y UP TO 2" 14y -1 ADDED TO 21 ' 14z OVER 2" 14z -1 ADDED OVER 2" 14aa GAS STOVE 14ab -14ab1 '. NOT WATER HEATER '14ac GAS LIGHT 14ad GAS BARBECUE 14ae INCINERATOR 14af MINIMUM PERMIT FEE 900 STATE CODE 400,000 900 STATE CODE 0 60/HR 0 60 /HR 0 50 0 50 0 500 0 500 0 25 0 25 0 25 0 25 0 25 0 25 0 25 0 25 0 BLDG PERMIT AMT 0 BLDG PERMIT AMT 0 75 0 75 0 50 0 50 .0 _ 50 0 50 1,400 8 1,400 10 6 7 6 7 5 7 9 10 9 12 9 10 9 10 9 10 9 15 9 15 9 10 9 15 9 10 18 24 18 24 18 24 100 125 100 125 12 12 120 120 120 120 13 15 2 3 18 .20 2 3 9 10 9 10 9 10 9 15 15 15 12 55,000 14 450,000 55,000 HEATING, VENTILATION & MECHANICAL: MINIMUM FEE:' SINGLE FAMILY COMMERCIAL FEE CALCULATION: $0 - $500 $501 - $1,000 $1,001 - $5,000 $5,001 - $10,000 $10,000 - $25,000 $25,001 - $50,000 $50,001 & OVER FURNACE: 100,000 OR < BTU ADDED 50,000 BTU REPLACE FURNACE: 100,000 OR < BTU ADDED 50,000 BTU REPAIRS /ALTERATION: UP TO $500 ADDED 5500 AIR CORD COILS ADD: UP TO 1,000 CFM ADDED 1,000 CFM ..DIRECT GAS FIRED UNIT CONDITION FURNACE: 100,000 BTU /1000CFM ADD 50,000 BTU /1000CFM DUCT SYSTEMS: UP TO $500 ADDED $500 WARM AIR CORD. SYS.: < 1,000 CFM > 1,000 CFM HEATING OR COOLING ONLY: < 1,000 CFM > 1,000 CFM REPAIRS/ALTERATION: UP TO $500 ADDED $500 SUMMER AIR COND: UP TO 1,000 CFM ADDED 1,000 CFM ALTER, ADD, REPAIRS: < $500 > $500 HIGH VELOCITY SYSTEMS < 1200 CFM > 1200 CFM VENTILATION: UP TO 2,000 CFM ADDED 1,000 CFM NOXIOUS VAPORS: UP TO 2,000 CFM ADDED 1,000 CFM 2,000 23 8 13 8 13 8 18 8 23 33 8 13 8 16 6 16 6 13 8 18 8 11 6 22 27 18 8 20 8 u 2,000 i 15 20 2.75% OF CONTRACT PRICE $13.75 + 2.5% > $500 $26.25 + 2.25% > $1,000 5116.25 + 2% > $5,000 $216.25 + 1.75% > $10,000 $478.75 + 1.5% > S25,000 5853.75 + 1.25% > $50,000 18 7 22 11 11 18 9 9 13 18 31 44 76 100 119 145 208 13 8 13 19 30 15 27 42 76 90 119 144 210 13 16 13 18 34 10 5 13 2 18 2 13 8 13 8 12 14 17 EXHAUST SYSTEM: '15d-5 MULTIPLE DWELLINGS 15d -5a ADDED SYSTEMS DIRECT GAS FIRED AIR SYS 6 < $500 15d -7 > $500 ALTER, ADD, REPAIR 15d -8 EACH 5500 15d-9 WARM AIR AC ELECTRIC HEATING: 15e-1 FIRST 96,000 BTU 15e-2 ADDED 48,000 BTU GAS BURNER: 15f-1 UP TO 100,000 BTU 15f -2 100,000- 200,000 15f -3 200,000- 400,000 15f-4 400,000- 600,000 15f -5 600,000- 1,000,000 15f -6 1,000,000- 2,500,000 15f -7. 2,500,000- 10,000,000 15f -7.1 10,000,000- 50,000,000 15f -8 50,000,000-75,000,000 15f -9 > 75,000,000 ' 'REPAIRS /ALTERATION: 15f -10 UP TO $100 15f -11 ADDED $100 L.P. GAS INSTALL: 15f -12 500 GALS OR < 15f-13 501 - 2,000 GALS 15f -14 OVER 2,000 GALS OIL BURNERS: 1 < 2 GALS/HR ,•2 < 4 GAL /HR 158-3 < 7 GALS /HR 15g -4 < 18 GALS/HR 158-5 < 75 GALS /HR 15g -6 < 350 GALS /HR 15g' -7 < 500 GALS /HR 15g-8 OVER 500 GAL /HR ANY TANK NO BURIED: 15g -9 560 GAL OR < 158-10 OVER 560 GALS ANY TANK BURIED• . 15g -11 560 GAL OR < 158-12 OVER 560 GALS 15g -13 OVER 2,000 GALS ALTERATIONS OR REPAIRS: 15g -14 < $100 15g -15 > 5100 GAS PIPING: 15h -1 <21, 8< 3 OPENING 15h-2 OVER 3 OPENINGS 15h-3 >2" 8< 3 OPENING 15h -4 OVER 3 OPENINGS REFRIGERATION SYSTEM: M -1 UP TO 36,000 BTU M -2 ADDED 36,000 BTU ALTERATION /REPAIR: 3 UP TO $500 ADDED $500 FACTORY CHIMNEY: 15j -1 UP TO 8" D1AM 15j-2 OVER 811 DIAM 15j -3 FACTORY FIREPLACE 18 7 22 11 11 18 9 9 13 18 31 44 76 100 119 145 208 13 8 13 19 30 15 27 42 76 90 119 144 210 13 16 13 18 34 10 5 13 2 18 2 13 8 13 8 12 14 17 PARK AND RECREATION REGISTRATION FEE: ' CLEANING AC SYS.: '15k -1 < 8500 16 15k -2 > $500 10 9 STOKER: 800 1 < 14 SO. FT. 11 151 -2 EA. ADD. SO. FT. 1 491 POWDERED FUEL BURNERS: TENNIS INSTR 151 -3 < 350 LB/HR 9 151 -4 EA. ADD. 25 LBS. 1 5 ALTERATIONS OR REPAIRS: 5 151 -5 < $100 11 151 -6 > $100 3 STEANAOT WATER SYSTEM: 15m -1 UP TO 100,000 BTU 22 15m -2 ADDED 50,000 BTU 8 BOILER ONLY: 15m -3 UP TO 240,000 BTU 13 15m -4 ADDED 50,000 BTU 8 ALTERATION/REPAIR: 15m -5 UP TO $500 13 16m -6 ADDED $500 8 15n STEAM OR HOT WATER SYS. HEATING /COOLING: 150 -1 UP TO 100,000 BTU 18 150 -2 ADDED 50,000 BTU 10 COIL: 150 -3 UP TO 100,000 BTU 22 150 -4 ADDED 50,000 BTU 12 ALTERATION /REPAIR: 150 -5 UP TO 8500 13 ADDED $500 8 POWER PLANT: •1 UP TO 200,000 BTU 12 15p-1 UP TO 6 HP 12 15p -2 ADDED 100,000 BTU 8 15p -2 ADDED 3 HP 8 ALTERATION /REPAIR: 15p -3 UP TO $500 12 15p -4 ADDED 8500 8 600000 PARK AND RECREATION REGISTRATION FEE: PLAYGROUND 460. 8 460 9 AQUATIC INSTR 800 22 800 30 T -BALL 491 22 491 22 TENNIS INSTR 430 22 430 25 FIELD USE FEE 4,700 5 65,000 4,700 5 TREE REMOVAL 10 65,000 70,000 OTHER CHARGES ENGINEERING 8 CLERICAL MUNICIPAL COURT FINES CHARGES TO OTHER FUNDS CONTRIBUTION FROM LIQUOR FUND SALES 8 RENTAL PROPERTY MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE INCOME ON INVESTMENTS LABORATORY FEES DONATIONS SERVICERS HRA OTHER TOTAL FEES 8 CHARGES 120,000 UTILITIES 510,000 SEWER RENTAL CHARGE: 37a SGL FAN. < 1800 CU FT 37a - > 1800 CU FT 37b 4 -UNIT APTS 37c COMM 8 IND BLDGS 37d IND USER SEWER STRENGTH 38a -38f SAC 500 WATER SERVICE: ' EAST OF BEARD AV 1,500 MORNINGSIDE AREA _.e. ALL OTHER AREAS 39d LESS THAN ABOVE 12.50/EA FLAT WATER CHARGE: 39f PARK DEPT /SPRINK /SKATE 39g ST DEPT /FLUSH 39i CURB WATER STOPS 120,000 150,000 510,000 515,000 100,620 105,000 350,000 350,000 20,000 22,000 20,000 20,000 70,000 80,000 3,000 3,000 500 500 135,000 145,000 1,500 2,000 $2,475,120 $2,598,800 20.50/QTR 20.50 /QTR 1.20/100 CU FT 1.20/100 CU FT 84.50 +15.50 > 4 84.50+15.50 > 4 OR 1.10/100 CU FT OR 1.10/100 CU FT 21 /WATER METER OR 21 /WATER METER OR 1.10 /CU FT 1.10 /CU FT 575 600 1.10/100 CU FT 1.10/100 CU FT 1.10/100 CU FT 1.10/100 CU FT .40/100 CU FT .48/100 CU FT 2.20 /MONTH 2.20 /MONTH 2,500 2,500 1,000 1,000 12.50/EA 12.50/EA CITY OF EDINA FEES AND CHARGES PARK ENTERPRISES FEES 1989 1990 FEES REVENUE FEE REVENUE ART CENTER Memberships Family $35.00 $35.00 Individual $25.00 $9,900 $25.00 $13,000 Registration 1990 Member 1990 Non - Member 24 hrs $3.00 $3.25 21 hrs $3.25 $3.50 20 hrs $3.25 $3.50 18 hrs $3.25 $3.50 16 hrs $3.25 $3.50 14 hrs $3.50 $3.75 12 hrs $3.50 $3.75 10 hrs $3.50 $3.75 9 hrs $3.50 $3.75 8 hrs $3.50 $3.75 6 hrs $4.00 $105,000 $4.25'' $141,000 Converted from rate per class to hourly rate ARENA Single Hour Rate $85.00 $336,000 $90.00 $354,000 Open Skating.(Youth 8 Adult) $2.50 $15,000 $2.50 15,000 Skate Rental $1.06 $1.06 Skate Sharpening $1.50 $5,000 $2.00 6,000 Season Tickets Resident Family $55.00 $55.00 Resident Individual $35.00 $35.00 Non- Resident Family $62.00 $62.00 Non- Resident Individual $50.00 $12,000 $50.00 11,000 Classes $45.00 $40,000 $50.00 60,000 GUN RANGE General Admissions Pistol 1/2 hour $4.00 .$14,000 $4.00 $17,750 25 rounds trap 4.50 14,000 $4.50 17,750 Rental of Property Building /hr 45.00 12,440 545:00 9,500 POOL Season Tickets .Resident Family 846.00 846.00 Resident Individual 30.00 30.00 Non- Resident Family 54.00 54.00 Non- Resident Individual 36.00 867,000 36.00 868,000 Daily Admission Adult & Youth 2.50 822,000 2.50 822,000 GOLF COURSE Patron Cards Individual 850.00 850.00 Additional Family Members 45.00 888,000 45.00 895,000 Computerized Handicaps Resident 11.00 12.00 Non- Resident 15.00 83,000 16.00 83,200 Lockers Men's 72" 33.00 35.00 Men's 4218 22.00 25.00 Ladies' 72" 14.00 81,500 15.00 81,500 Cart & Club Rental Club Rental 5.00 5.00 Pull Carts 1.75 2.00 Golf Cars 18 holes 18.00 18.00 9 holes 9.50 10.00 Golf Cars - Seniors 18 holes 15.50 16.00 9 holes 8.50 8110,000 9.00 8117,000 Group Car Fees 22.00 24.00 " Group Golf Lessons Adult 45.00 47.00 Junior 25.00 84,000 25.00 85,000 Golf Range Large Bucket 83.75 4.00 Small Bucket 82.50 2.75 Warm -up Bucket 81.00 1.25 Green Fees Green Fees 18 hole - non- patron 813.50 14.50 18 hole - patron 810.00 -11.50 9 hole - non- patron 88.50 9.00 9 hole - patron 87.00 7.50 Green Fees - Senior 18 hole - non- patron 12.50 13.50 18 hole - patron 9.00 10.50 9 hole - non-patron 8.00 8.50 9 hole - patron 6.50 7.00 Group.Fees 17.00 20.00 Group Fees - 9 hole 10.00 8495,000 12.00 8540,000 EDINBOROUGH Executive Course $2.50 $62,000 32.50 $75,265 , Adult - non- patron 6.25 6.25 .Adult - patron 5.25 5.25 Sr. 8 Jr. - non- patron 5.25 5.25 Sr. 8 Jr. - patron 4.25 3180,000 4.25 3185,000 Executive Course Cart Rental $250.00 $10,000 $250.00 $10,000 Golf Cars - everyone 7.00 7.00 Pull Carts 1.75 $500 1.75 Group Fees 7.00 311,000 7.00 $17,000 Braemar Room Night Rate - resident 450.00 500.00 Night Rate - non- resident 500.00 550.00 Day Rate - resident 225.00 250.00 Day Rate - non-resident 275.00 328,000 300.00 329,000 Concession Fees $75.00 Variable prices EDINBOROUGH Daily Passes $2.50 $62,000 32.50 $75,265 , Season Passes .Edina individual $150.00 $150.00 Edina family $200.00 $200.00 Non -Edina individual $250.00 $250.00 Non -Edina family $250.00 $10,000 $250.00 $10,000 Locker Fee discontinued Towel Fee $.50 $500 3.50 Skate Rental Fee $1.25 $5,000 $1.25 $6,250 Rental Income Box Lunch Program Range $6 - $10 Range $6 - $10 Domestic Photography by: Professionals per hour Grotto $50.00 $50.00 Theater $75.00 $75.00 Great Hall $75.00 $75.00 Ice Rink $100.00 $100.00 Commercial Photography by: Professional per hour - Grotto $150.00 $150.00 Theater $200.00 $200.00 Great Hall $300.00 $300.00 Ice Rink $300.00 $300.00 Mixed Use $500.00 $500.00 Birthday Party Table $15.00 $15.00 Table Rental to Corp. East 8 Park Plaza $5.00 $5.00 Dance Floor $50.00 Included in Rental Mirror Ball $20.00 Included in Rental Catering Kitchen Group site 200 Group size 300 Group size 500 Commercial Use i.e. Trade Shows Building Rentals Category 1 City of Edina 8 Boards/ Associations Category 2 Edina Civic Organizations and Edina Schools (Mon -Thu) Great Hall Arena Theatre Pool Grotto Category 2 Exclusive Use Great Hall Arena Theatre Pool Grotto Category 3 Edina Residents 8 Businesses (per hour) Great Hall Grotto Arena Theatre Pool Category 3 Exclusive Use Great Hall Grotto Arena Theatre Pool Category 4 Non -Edina Residents and Business (per hour) Great Hall Grotto Arena Theatre Pool Category 4 Exclusive Use Great Hall Grotto Arena Theatre Pool $300.00 $300.00 $50.00 Included in Rental $75.00 Included in Rental $100.00 lncluded'in Rental $2,000.00 $2,500.00 $150 /day + $12 /man $150 /day + $12 /man set -up /down set -up /down $125.00 $125.00 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 $75.00 $75.00 $25.00 $25.00 $500.00 $500.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $50.00 $50.00 $150.00 $150.00 $300.00 $300.00 $75.00 $75.00 $125.00 $125.00 $125.00 $125.00 $60.00 $60.00 $1,250.00 Average park rental . $150.00 for use of all areas $150.00 estimated at $1750 $200.00 $60.00 $350.00 $350.00 $125.00 $125.00 $150.00 $150.00 $150.00 $150.00 $85.00 $85.00 $1,500.00 Average park rental $225.00 for-use of all areas $225.00 estimated at $1750 $250.00 •Included w/ Cat.'3) $125.00 $59,500 $125,740 A. o e J �o VI BBB les S REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor and Council Agenda Item # IX.A From: John Wallinl�;W Consent ❑ Finance Director Information Only ❑ Date: October z, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Fees and Charges 0 To Council Water and Sewer Rate Increases Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Facilitate discussion regarding water and sewer increases as a result of sharply higher sewage treatment costs for approval with all other fees and charges at the October 16, 1989 Council meeting. Info /Background: I propose that even though the rate increase is due to higher sewage treatment costs, the increase be weighted towards the water rate side. To support this proposal attached are a background memorandum, a sewer and water rate study, and past memorandums from the Fire Chief regarding the dangers of low water pressure. Last fall the City Council approved higher water and sewer rates for 1989. These rates were increased from $.33 to $.40 per 100 cu. ft. for water.and $1.12 to $1.15 per 100 cu. ft. for sewer. The rate increases were required for 1989 for three reasons: 1. To keep up with the increase in Metropolitan Waste Control Commission collection and treatment charges. 2. To pay for the bonds that the City acquired for the construction of one additional water tower and the installation of one new well. 3. To fund operating losses of the previous three years. The amount being charged by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, after the new rates were approved last year, increased their rates from $191,729.94 payable in 1988 to $220,257.78 payable in 1989. This increase raised costs for the City by $342,334 while the City's increase last year was expected to raise only $300,000. in -added revenues. It is important to note that sanitary sewer charges account for approximately 75% of our utility bill. Virtually all of this sewer charge is attributable to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission charges with only a small percentage attributable to City related sanitary sewer costs. I propose the City increase its water and sewer rates the .,following way: % CURRENT RCS PROPOSED RATES INCREASE WATER $.40 per 100 cu.ft. $.48 per 100 cu.ft. 20% SEWER $1.15 per 100 cu.ft. $1.20 per 100 cu.ft. 4.3% MINIMUM $27.10 for let 1800 $27.10 for let 1600 0% CHARGE cu. ft. cu. ft. STORM SEWER $5.00 per quarter $5.00 per quarter. 0% It is estimated that the above increases in water and sewer rates would equate to approximately $250,000 more revenue for water and $100,000 more revenue for sewer. During the drought of 1988 the City actually lost money on lawn watering activities because of the repairs that had to be made due to the continual operation of the water pumping equipment. The City's low water rates encourage heavier use during dry summer periods and cause water shortages that. :4 threaten the Fire Department's ability to satisfactorily fight fires.and result in high repair bills as pumping equipment run at capacity for long periods of time. The reason that the proposed increases are weighted towards the water side even though the increase is due to higher sewer charges is to try to encourage conservation of water during the summer months. Water being relatively inexpensive, people are more likely to use more of•it for lawn watering. According to a representative from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, the substantial increase in 1989 sewer treatment charges are mostly due to infiltration of storm water because of the wet summer of.1987 and in particular, the massive amounts of water that went through the sanitary sewer system during the July 1987 flood. The Metropolitan Waste.Control Commission has issued their proposed charges for 1990 which are roughly what they are in 1989. Attached, is a comparison of the City of Edina's current and proposed rates with the rates of St. Louis Park, Richfield, and Hopkins. APPENDIX B CITY OF EDINA PAGE 1 OF 2 SEWER 8 WATER RATE STUDY SEPTEMBER 1989 CITY OF EDINA ST. LOUIS PARK RICHFIELD HOPKINS CURRENT RATES PROPOSED RATES 1600 CUBIC FEET: WATER $8.21 $13.76 $10.24 $6.60 $6.60 FIXED /METER CHARGE 10.79 .00 .00 .00 .00 SEWER 14.11 10.72 20.96 20.50 20.50 - $33.11 ------------ - - - - -- ------------------ $24.48 =---------- - - - - -- ----------- ----------- - - - - -- ----------- $31.20 - - - - -- - - - - -- $27.10 ----------- - - - - -- ----------- - - - - -- $27.10 ----------------- ----------------- 1700 CUBIC FEET: WATER $8.72 $14.62 $10.88 $6.60 $8.16 FIXED /METER CHARGE 10.79 .00 .00 .00 .00 SEWER 14.99 11.39 22.27 20.50 20.40 $34.51 ------------ - - - - -- ------------------ $26.01 ----------- - - - - -- ----------- ----------- - - - - -- ----------- $33.15 - - - - -- - - - - -- $27.10 ----------- - - - - -- ----------- - - - - -- $28.56 ----------------- --------------- -- 1800 CUBIC FEET: WATER $9.23 $15.48 $11.52 $6.60 $8.64 FIXED /METER CHARGE 10.79 .00 .00 .00 .00 SEWER 15.88 12.06 23.58 20.50 21.60 $35.90 $27.54 $35.10 $27.10 $30.24 1900 CUBIC FEET: WATER $9.75 $16.34 $12.16 $7.60 $9.12 FIXED /METER CHARGE 10.79 .00 .00 .00 .00 SEWER 16.76 12.73 24.89 21.85 22.80 $37.30 $29.07 $37.05 $29.45 $31.92 2400 CUBIC FEET: WATER $12.31 $20.64 $15.36 $9.60 $11.52 FIXED /METER CHARGE 10.79 .00 .00 .00 .00 ` SEWER 21.17 16.08 31.44 27.60 28.80 $44.27 $36.72 ----------- $46.80 - - - - -- $37.20 ----------- - - - - -- $40.32 --------------- -- 3000 CUBIC FEET: WATER $15.39 $25.80 $19.20 $12.00 $14.40 FIXED /METER CHARGE 10.79 .00 .00 .00 .00 SEWER 26.46 20.10 39.30 34.50 36.00 $52.64 $45.90 858.50 $46.50 $50.40 APPENDIX B CITY OF EDINA PAGE 2 OF 2 SEWER & WATER RATE STUDY SEPTEMBER 1989 CITY OF EDINA ST. LOUIS PARK RICHFIELD HOPKINS CURRENT RATES PROPOSED RATES 4000 CUBIC FEET: WATER $20.17 $34.40 $25.60 $16.00 $19.20 FIXED /METER CHARGE 10.79 .00 .00 .00 .00 SEWER 35.28 26.80 52.40 46.00 48.00 $66.24 ------------ - - - - -- $61.20 ----------- - - - - -- $78.00 ----------- - - - - -- $62.00 ----------- - - - - -- $67.20 ----------------- 5000 CUBIC FEET: WATER $24.95 $43.00 $32.00 $20.00 $24.00 FIXED /METER CHARGE 10.79 .00 .00 .00 .00 SEWER 44.10 33.50 65.50 57.50 60.00 - $79.84 ------------ - - - - -- ------------ - - - - -- $76.50 ----------- - - - - -- ----------- - - - - -- $97.50 ----------- - - - - -- ----------- - - - - -- $77.50 ----------- - - - - -- ----------- - - - - -- $84.00 ----------------- --------------- -- 6000 CUBIC FEET: WATER $29.73 $51.60 $38.40 $24.00 $28.80 FIXED /METER CHARGE 10.79 .00 .00 .00 .00 SEWER 52.92 40.20 78.60 69.00 72.00 $93.44 ------------ - - - - -- $91.80 ----------- - - - - -- $117.00 ----------- - - - - -- $93.00 ----------- - - - - -- $100.80 --------------- -- 7000 CUBIC FEET: WATER $34.51 $60.20 $44.80. $28.00 . $33.60 FIXED /METER CHARGE 10.79 .00 .00 .00 .00 SEWER 61.74 46.90 91.70 80.50 84.00 $107.04• $1 %7.10 $136.50 $108.50 $117.60 SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY ------------ - - - - -- ----------- - - - - -- ----------- - - - - -- ----------- - - - - -- --------------- -- SEWER & WATER CHARGES: WATER: $.86 /100 CUFT $.64 PER 100 CUFT $.40 PER 100 CUFT $.48 PER 100 CUFT 1st 3,000 CUFT $.513/100 CUFT NEXT 44,000 CUFT $.478/100 CUFT MINIMUM USEAGE MINIMUM USEAGE OVER 47,000 CUFT $.441/100 CUFT 1,800 CUFT: 1,600 CUFT: $6.60 $6.60 SEWER: $.926/100 CUFT $.67/100 CUFT $1.31 PER 100 CUFT $1.15 PER 100 CUFT $1.20 PER 100 CUFT MINIMUM USEAGE MINIMUM USEAGE 1,800 CUFT: 1,600 CUFT: $20.50 $20.50 METER CHARGE $4.12 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 FIXED CHARGE $6.67 $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 STORM DRAINAGE $.00 $6.50 $.00 $5.00 $5.00 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: June 1, 1938 TO: Ken Rosland, City Manager FROM: Ted Paulfranz, Fire Chief SUBJECT: City Water System Improveme I strongly recommend Council approval of the water system improvements proposed by the City Engineer. The present system cannot meet current peak demands and results in our summer water emergencies. These emergencies adversely affect fire operations in three ways: 1. The automatic fire control sprinkler systems are designed to operate within a pre - determined (normal range pressure). Should pressures fall below this range, the system will not operate properly and we cannot expect them to control fires. We are very dependent on these systems to protect large buildings and big lire risks. Z. .Fire alarm systems will react to erratic pressure changes by sending in false alarms. This drains - manpower and increases overtime costs on needless responses. We need to better manage falling system pressures. 3. Manual firefighting tactics are adversely affected by low pressures. Pumpers cannot use hydrants at less than 10 PSI. Such - pressures are becoming common at the high points in town during our water emergencies. Fire fighting at low pressure requires more equipment and manpower to do the same job. In the worst case, the involved structure would be left to burn, as limited available water would be needed to protect exposed properties. Current summer demand is exceeding our ability to supply. Improvements are needed both in increased supply (wells) and in elevated storage. The proposed well and tank would meet today's needs. Funding for these,improvements could come from the peak users in the form of premium rates during high demand. TRP /ras I`. MEMORANDUM TO: Hoffman, City Engineer FROM: Paulfranz SUBJ: Recommendations —Policy for- "low water system pressure or storage capacity ". DATE: July 15, 1980 Please review attached ISO Grading Schedule "Water Supply ": For purposes of definition, "low water system pressure or storage capacity" could be any of the following: — Industrial Park at or below 90 P.S.I. — Elevated storage towers empty — Grandview area at or below 40 P.S.I. ` — Engineering Department reporting system breakdown.or..failures. As a muter of policy, I would recommend the following practices be implemented: — Iuprove public awareness of the summer manths June, July, and August odd -even sprinkling policy, and impose penalties by way of watter billing. — The Fire Department be notified when "low system pressure or storage capacity" conditions develop so that fire response and attack tactics can. b_e_.adjusted. — if system pressure continues to deteriorate below 90 P.S.I. Industrial Park, or 40 P.S.I. Grandview area, and system storage capacity of 2.3 million gallons is not: maintained, then -a "Water Emergency" should be declared and a total watering ban imposed. Present "fire control methods utilized by the Edina Fire Department depend on a strong watering system. High static pressures are critically important to both automatic (hydraulic designed).. fire sprinkling systems and manual fire attack. High system pressures permit effective fire control with less than adequate suppression strength. For thos< fires of long duration or those presenting outside exposure. problems, reserve storage capacity is vitally important. Y 4� r �91�11� • ,��bRPOM��O • Jose REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland Agenda Item # Ix. B' From: David A. Velde . Consent F - Information Only ❑ Date: October 2, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: 1990 -91 Community ❑X To Council Health Services Plan Update Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adopt a resolution to approve the 1990 -1991 Community Health Service Plan Update. Info /Background: Since 1977, the City of Edina has been providing Public Health Services in the community through the Community Health Services Act of 1976. In 1987, Edina submitted a Community Health Services Plan for calendar years 1988 and 1989. We are now submitting the 1990 -1991 Community Health Services Plan Update with no changes from the previous Community Health Services Plan. The City of Edina will receive $115,753.00 in subsidy for calendar - years 1990 and 1991. • APPLICATION COVER FORM INDENTIFICATION AND AUTHORIZATION JAME OF APPLICANT ORGANIZATION EDINA HEALTH DEPARTMENT SPONSORING UNITS OF GOVERNMENT FUNDING PERIOD City /County Date Approved I /--L/gam to " /3-L/gL CITY OF EDINA OCTOBER 2, 1989 SUBSIDY REQUEST 90 90 Name of Counties 19W Local Budget 198)8 CHS Subsidy Budget City of Edina 767.990 115.753 TOTAL 767,990 115,753 91 19W SUBSIDY REQUESTS 115,753 ALL APPROPRIATE REGIONAL REVIEW AGENCIES (LIST EACH RDC) WERE SENT COPIES OF THIS APPLICATION: Arector Director Agency Agency Address Address Date Sent Date Sent Director Director Agency Agency _ Address Address Date Sent Date Sent Application is made for a subsidy under the provisions of the Local Public Health Act in the amount and for the purposes stated herein. By signature, the Authorized Official agrees and as the authority to agree to comply with the conditions and reporting requirements nsistent with ap l ble MDH les and Minnesota Statute stated herein. Authorized Official ngiVa ignaturc Title City Manager Date September 22, 1989 Subsidy Application Materials and Forms ASSURANCES AND AGREEMENTS BY SIGNATURE, THE AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL AGREED AND ASSURES THAT. 1. Services will be provided in accordance with State and Federal laws, rules and policies. 2. The Board of Health will comply with state and federal requirements for equal opportunity employment. 3. The Board will comply with state and federal requirements relating to data privacy or confidentiality of information collected on individuals. 4. The Board will provide the Minnesota Department of Health with information referenced in the CHS plan where applicable. 5. ._ Standards for programs or activities will be used in carrying out affected programs or activities where those standards exist. 6. The requirements for full community participation, as defined in Minnesota Rules 4700.1800, have been met. 7. The Health Advisory Committee or Health Task Force of any Human Services Board Advisory Committee in the county where applicable (Minn. Stat. 402.03), shall meet the composition and reporting requirements of the Community Health Services Advisory Committee required by Minnesota Statute. 8. The Board will comply with all standards relating to fiscal accountability that apply to the Minnesota Department of Health, specifically-, a. The local match identified in the budget submission complies with the definition specified in Minnesota Rules 4700.0100, Subpart 15 and meet the following tests: 1) Cash contributions are cash outlays, including the outlay of money contributed by other public agencies and institutions and private organizations and individuals. 2) In -kind /Direct Assistance contributions represent the value of non -cash contributions provided by (1) the applicant, (2) other public agencies and institutions, and (3) private organizations and individuals. Such goods and services directly benefit and are identifiable from the applicant's records. Specifically, the agency calculates the hours of volunteer services by the same method used by the agency for its employees, and the Board documents the basis for determining charges for personal services, supplies and expenses. b. The Board will submit budget revisions to the Commissioner for prior approval in accordance with CHS Policy No. 4 (5/1/78). (Attached) C. Reports will be filed with the Commissioner of. Health in accordance with Minnesota Rules 4700.1700. d. The Board will maintain a Financial Management System that provides: 1) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each activity. 2) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for subsidy supported activities. These records shall contain information pertaining to subsidy awards and authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, liabilities (encombrances), outlays and income. 3) Demonstration that the Board has effective control over the accountability for all funds, property and other assets. 4) Comparison of actual obligations with budget amounts for each activity. Subsidy Application Materials and Forms 5) Accounting records that are supported by source documentation. 6) Audits that can be made by or at the direction of the Board or the Department of Health. CHS financial records will be retained until audited, with the following qualifications: aa) The records will be retained beyond this period if audit findings have not been resolved. bb) Records for non - expendable property which was acquired with subsidy funds will be retained for three years afte final dis , sition. AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL TITLE City Manager DATE September 22, 1989 Subsidy Application Materials and Forms RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAN FOR PROVISION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES IN THE CITY OF EDINA AND THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR THE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES ACT SUBSIDY WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina is the official governing body of the City of Edina and functions as.the official Board of Health in the City of Edina; and WHEREAS, the City Council is committed to promote, support and maintain the health of the entire community at the highest level; and WHEREAS, the Community Health Services Act provides for subsidies in support of public health services on the local level throughout the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, a special needs study has been made and a special public meeting held relative to the needs and priorities of the community for Community Health Services; and WHEREAS, the Community Health Services Advisory Committee of the City of Edina has reviewed the plan for the provision of public health services in the City of Edina and recommends its approval to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed this self -same plan and finds it consistent with the needs and priorities of the community as determined by the Community Health Services Advisory Committee and as expressed by the citizens of Edina; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that the Community Health Services Plan for the City of Edina is approved and authorization is hereby given to submit an application for the Community Health Services Act subsidy for the years 1990 -91. ADOPTED this 2nd day of October, 1989. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution is a true and correct copy of the resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 2, 1989 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 3rd day of October, 1989. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk Agenda Item IX.0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION Name Term Expires Appointed Eligible for Reappointment Bailey, John, 69 Woodland Circle 2 -1 -92 5 -2 -83 Yes Faust, Nan K., 5522 Highwood Dr. 2 -1 -90 2 -21 -89 Yes Hale, Robert W., 5613 Hawkes Dr. 2 -1 -92 2 -21 -89 Yes Johnson, Gordon V., 5737 Jeff Place 2 -1 -92 7 -24 -70 No Johnson, Lee W., 5217 Abercrombie Dr. 2 -1 -90 3 -2 -87 Yes McClelland, Helen, 5717 Continental Dr. 2 -1 -91 2 -9 -76 Yes Palmer, John M., 5813 Eastview Dr. 2 -1 -91 2 -1 -81 Yes Runyan, David T., 4508 North Av. 2 -1 -91 2 -1 -70 Yes Shaw, Virginia, 5408 Kellogg Av. 2 -1 -90 2 -1 -84 Yes Workinger, Geoffrey, 5224 Kellogg.Av. 2 -1 -92 12 -21 -87 Yes Vacancy 9/13/89 2 -1 -90 (unexpired) r EDINA ORDINANCE NO. 102 AN ORDINANCE LIMITING TERMS OF SERVICE OF INDIVIDUALS APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL TO BOARDS. COMMISSIONS OR COMMITTEES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Limitation on Tenure. No person shall be appointed or reappointed by the City Council to any board, commission, committee or any other advisory or legislative body if he or she has served on that board, commission or committee for a cumulative period of twelve or more years (whether or not consecutive). . Section 2. Exceptions. Members of the City Council and employees of the City of Edina who by virtue of their employment with the City are appointed by the City Council to boards, commissions and committees shall be exempt frow the provisions of this ordinance. Section 3. Valid Appointment. any person who is appointed or reappointed in error or inadvertance in violation of this ordinance shall yet be deemed validly appointed and all action taken by such person in the position to which he or she is appointed shall be valid, but such person may be discharged and a new appointment or reappointment made at the pleasure of the Council. Section 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect on January 1, 1990. First. Reading: April 18, 1988 Second Reading: May 16, 1988 Published in the Edina Sun - Current on May 25, 1988 ATTEST: /s/ MARCELLA M. DAEHN City Clerk -4- /s/ C. WAYNE COURTNEY Mayor 1 6/6/88 1 from each organization. Member Smith moved rejection of the proposed amendment. Motion failed for lack of second. Member Turner then moved that those attending speak for the Council at the annual meeting on June 9, 1988 reflecting the points raised: 1) justification for any increase (more information on financial assumptions used),.2) explore the user fee concept, 3) express concern that suburban communities continue to pay an unfair share. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Richards Motion carried. PLANTINGS ON MC CAULEY TRAIL DISCUSSED. Bob Kojetin, Director of Parks 6 Recreation, recalled that at the last meeting the Council had briefly discussed the request from Robert N. Olsen, on behalf of the Indian Foothills Association, to consider a tree planting project along McCauley Trail. The Council had asked that more information be brought back to the Council. Staff would recommend that the City not participate in this program because this has not been our policy in the past. As has been in other cases, staff would recommend encouraging the neighbors to participate in the program themselves by purchasing, planting and maintaining the trees as a continuing beautification by the residents of the community. He said he had talked with Mr. Olsen about the recommendation and had also talked with Ann Fallon, 6417 Timber Ridge, who had written on behalf of the residents of Timber Ridge asking that the City plant ground cover and shrubbery on N their retaining wall. Robert Olsen, 6709 Samuel Road, spoke in support of their proposed tree project on McCauley Trail. Bob Teese, 6705 Samuel Road, stated that maybe the residents could raise some of the money but would like the City's LO cooperation. Member Turner commented that the proposal is a marvelous idea and that the City could give advice for such a project but would support this as private involvement. Member Smith said that there is too big a squeeze for City CD funds on other projects such as the storm water plan to realistically find money Q for the proposed tree project. Mayor Pro -Tem Richards suggested to Mr. Olsen and Mr. Teese that they continue to discuss and get advice from Mr. Kojetin regarding the project if the residents wish to undertake it as a private project. BOARD /COMMISSION TERM EXPIRATION -DATES CLARIFIED.. - -= Manager Rosland referred to Ordinance No. 102 adopted on May 16, 1988 limiting terms of service of individua? appointed by the Council to boards, commissions or committees and asked for clarification of eligibility for re- appointment. If an individual has not serveo 12 years when their term is up can they be re- appointed if another term would result in their serving more than 12 years. Following discussion, it the consensus of the Council that such an individual could be re- appointed and that this would apply beginning January 1, 1990. PROPOSED MLC LAWSUIT DISCUSSED. Manager Rosland advised that the Municipal Legislative Commission (MLC) last week voted to proceed with the process to sue the State of Minnesota on the constitutionality of a portion of the new tax bill. The Operating Committee has developed four plans: 1) fiscal - cost and funding; 2) who will join the MLC in the lawsuit; 3) public relations; and 4) legal counsel to carry forward the lawsuit. The member city councils will have the opportunity to vote on the issue if the committee decides to proceed. The portion of the new tax bill that will be challenged is tax disparity. He explained that the tax law would bring everyone to a mill levy limit - if you spend over 125 mills the State will pay for that difference and if you spend less than 125 mills you pay your own freight. Manager Rosland also presented facts and figures on the new tax laws regarding State Aid and its affect on the City of Edina. Member Turner advised that the AMM Board was asked that the AMM join in the suit. The Board asked the AMM staff to come back with more facts and figures and the Board will consider at its next meeting a vote to join the suit. Member Kelly asked if the City of Minneapolis has been asked to join the suit. Manager Rosland said they are asking everybody to join in the suit but at this stage no firm commitments have been made. Mayor Pro -Tem Richards said he would like to see a specific written report with a proposal. He questioned if a judge or panel of judges would change the political wisdom of the elected officials of the State. He questioned spending time and money needlessly and said he would like an opinion from the City Attorney as to the likelihood of success of the suit. Manager Rosland said the Council would get the report when the four plans are developed and the Council could then make their decision. Following further debate, no formal action was taken. *HEARING DATE SET FOR TRANSFER OF CABLE FRANCHISE TO NEW GRANTEE, Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner to adopt the following resolution: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina that in accordance with the applicable provisions of Minnesota Statute 238 this Council shall meet on Monday, July 11, 1988, at 7:00 p.m. in the Edina City Hall to consider in public hearing the proposed transfer of the City's cable television franchise to a new Grantee; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper ten days prior to the hearing date. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. Agenda Item X.B WHITE OARS IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION 'September 19, 1989 The Honorable Mayor and Edina City Council Members Edina City Offices 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Re: Acquisition for Preservation of Townes Road Marsh Dear Mayor and Council Members: This is to confirm my personal appreciation and that of the White.Oaks Improvement Association and neighbors, past and present, for the excellent work done by the city staff, particu- larly Tom Erickson and Gordon Hughes, among others, in the review, consideration, and cooperative resolution of the numerous public and private issues involved in this matter. This would not have been possible without the sensitivity and practicality of the entire city council in forthrightly recognizing, addressing, and resolving all of the difficult issues involved. As Gordon Hughes reported to you last night, the total of checks and written pledges had reached the $20,000 level re- quired by the purchase agreement contingency. The process of converting the pledges to cash is well underway and should be completed without difficulty. We are working toward having all the cash or checks to the city by October 2, 1989, one week prior to the scheduled closing date requirement. This should enable the city to commence cashing the more recently received checks by October 1, 1989. We believe that the present intent of the city, as well as that of the approximately 60 private contributors who were solicited on that basis, is that the Townes Road marsh would remain in a "natural condition" as a bird and wildlife sanctuary and ponding area. However, to make this intent clear and to help avoid any future misunderstandings when all the facts and consid- erations are forgotten or not so- well - understood, we request that the city by resolution, agreement with the neighbors and /or the Association, and /or by appropriate dedication recognize the perma- nency of the natural condition and ponding area. For your records, we are enclosing a list of those persons who appeared at the council meeting last night to express their appreciation for the successful council action to preserve the marsh. As noted at the meeting, this included all the present officers of the Association and two of its five directors and many concerned neighbors from throughout White Oaks. Many others, who The Honorable Mayor and Edina City Council Members Page 2 September 19, 1989 were also concerned, would have appeared but'for the assurance that the matter had been resolved and that an ample delegation would be present to publicly hear and applaud that the matter had reached resolution by the meeting of the private contribution requirement of the purchase agreement, which is to be'closed October 9, 1989. If we can be of assistance in the closing of the matter or the confirmation of the permanency of the ponding and natural aspects, please do not hesitate to call the undersigned or any other officer of the Association. We would appreciate the con- tinuing advice of the status of the matter through closing. Very truly yours, WHITE OAKS IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION By , Connor F. Schmid Secretary- Treasurer CFS:wpc cc Mr. Gordon Hughes, Assistant City Manager Mr. Thomas Erickson, Esq., City Attorney Dr. Donald McMillan, President Ms. Mary Smith, Vice President Mr. Cliff Code, Pledge Coordinator oe °Cl) ors �y Po iv nn • �eee REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER Date: SEPTEMBER 29, 1989 Subject: LETTER CONCERNING -CHARLESTON HURRICANE DISASTER Recommendation: Info /Background: Agenda Item # _x-c. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance 0 Discussion The attached letter was received on Wednesday, September 27, 1989 by overnite letter from the U.S. Conference of Mayors concerning Mayor Joe Riley's plea for help for the City of Charleston following the hurricane disaster.of last week. Because of the urgency I have placed this on the Council Agenda for discussion. n +F, o f • W • • f• • f O President: KATHRYNJ. WHITMIRE Mayor of Houston Vice President. ROBERT M. ISAAC Mayor of Colorado Springs Pan Presideotst RICHARD L. BERKLEY Mayor of Kansas City, MO ARTHUR J. HOLLAND Mayor of Trenton JOSEPH P. RILEY, JR, Mayor of Charleston, SC COLEMAN A. YOUNG Mayor of Detroit JERRY ABRAMSON Mayor of Louisville WILLIAM J. ALTHAUS Mayor of York MARION S. BARRY, JR. Mayor of Washington. DC STEVEN B. CARISON Mayor of Jamestown. NY JUANITA CRABB Mayor of Binghamton W. WILSON GOODE Mayor of Philadelphia WILLIAM H. HUDNUT. III Mayor of Indianapolis THEODORE MANN Mayor of Newton JOSEPH R. PAOLINO. JR. Mayor of Providence JESSIE M. RATTLEY Mayor of Newport News JOHN P. ROUSAKIS Mayor of Savannah dvisosT Board' Chair RAYMOND L. FLYNN Mayor of Boston RICHARD ARRINGiON Mayor of Birmingham JOAN W.BARR Mayor of Evanston SIDNEY BARTHELEMY Mayor of New Orleans TOM BRADLEY Mayor of Los Angeles J. E. BUD CLARK Mayor of Portland, OR JANICE R. COGGESHALL Mayor of Galveston YGNACIO GARZA Mayor of Browrimile TERRY GODDARD Mayor of Phoenix SHARPEJAMES Mayor of Newark. NJ DAVE KARP Mayor of San Leandro EDWARD KOCH Mayor of New York SHEILA LODGE Mayor of Santa Barbara JOHN O. NORQUIST Mayor of Milaraukee SUE MYRICK Mayor of Charlotte DONNA OWENS Mayor of Tuledo JAMES P PERRON Mayor of Elkhart ELIZABETH D. RHEA Mayor of Rock Hill CHARLOTTE M. ROTHSTEIN Mayor of Oak Park, MI PEGGY RUBACH Mayor of Mesa BRIAN). SARAULT Mayor of Pawtucket PETESFERRAZZA Mayor of Reno GREG SPARROW Mayor of DeKalb NAO TAKASUGI Mayor of Oxnard Executive Direcoon J. THOMAS COCHRAN THE UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS 1620 EYE STREET, NORTHWEST WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 TELEPHONE (202) 293-7330 September 25,1989 TO: All'rMa 40Ge ch_ I - FROM: JA Thomas Cochran,, Executive Director SUBJECT: Charleston Hurt by Hurricane Hugo; Mayor Riley, people of Charleston Need Our Help Charleston Mayor Joe Riley is asking for our help. I know that all mayors have followed the Charleston - hurricane disaster on the TV networks and in the newspapers. We are especially sensitive to the devastation and the loss that Charlestonians have experienced, having just met there in June for our 57th Annual Conference. Mayor Riley called me this morning, appealing to the Conference of Mayors for help in expanding his relief effort. The mayor wants all of his colleagues to know that, tonight in Charleston, 75,000 people are homeless. Many of these people were poor before the storm hit, and are even poorer now. Many have nothing left at all. The Mayor estimates that 15,000 trees must be cleared from the streets. Nearly a third of all buildings in the city sustained severe roof damage. There is no electricity in the city, and it will probably take from two weeks to a month before electricity is completely restored. Mayor Riley needs help to get his city running again, and help in caring for the people hit hardest by this disaster. First help in clearing the streets: Needed are trucks and other appropriate heavy equipment and the crews to operate them. Chain saws and people who can use them, the Mayor says, are "hot items" in Charleston right now. -2- If you are able to send trucks and crews or other. useful equipment, contact Howard Chapman or Mary Ann Sullivan at (803) 724 -3735. Second help for the people displaced by Hugo: For those left homeless by the hurricane, especially the poor, Mayor Riley is asking for shipments, by truck or other means of o non - perishable food (canned meats, vegetables, etc.), including baby food; o clothing for adults and children, and diapers; o building supplies, mainly roofing materials such as shingles, tarpaper, nails, etc. Shipments of these items should be coordinated with the City of Charleston; contact (803) 720 -3838. - Third for those hit hardest bv the hurricane: For the poor citizens of Charleston who are left with notitems money is needed to replace household goods, basic and other essentials. Mayor Riley says that if mayors reach out in their cities for help for Charlestonians, they should recommend that donations Disaster Relief are Fund, tdeductible 800 be sent Street• Charleston 1i ' Charlestdn. S C 29401, phone (803) 720 -3838. In Charleston, phone banks coordinating donations of food, clothing, materials and money are being staffed by volunteers. Because Mayor Riley has asked that the Conference handle his .special request for road - clearing crews and equipment, Conference staff will be following up this memorandum with phone calls to mayors' - offices. Anything you can do to help the Mayor and his people through t this chapter in Charleston's history will be deeply app 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 275704 09/20/89 275704 09/20/89 275704 09/15/89 275704 09/20/89 275705 09/15/89 275706 09/15/89 275707 09/15/89 275708 09/15/89 275709 09/15/89 275710 09/15/89 275711 09/15/89 275712 09/15/89 275713 .09/15/89. 275714 09/15/89 275715 09/15/89 275716 09/15/89 275717 09/15/89, 275718 09/15/89 27571 8 09/15/89 275719 09/15/89 275719 .09/15/89 275720 09/18/89 c AMOUNT 100.00 - 100.00- 100.00 100.00 .00 3,906.25 .3,906.25 * 4,031.54 4,031.54 * 108.96 108.96 120. 60 120.60 * 135.55 135.55 * 100.00 100.00 * 75.00 75.00 * 75.00 75.00 * 90.00 90.00 * 393.23 393.23 * 25.00 25.00 * 281.25 281.25 699.37 699.37 24.17 3.50 27.67 * 23.92 7.00 30.92 * 54.96 54.96 * i. 10 -02 -89 PAGE CHECK REGISTER # P.O. # MESSAGE VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION NORTH CENTRAL CONFERENCE NORTH CENTRAL CONFERENCE NORTH CENTRAL CONFERENCE NORTH CENTRAL CONFERENCE SWSCC COMMISSION SERV ARTHUR DICKEY AC REMODEL FRANCIS CALLAHAN AUGUST MILEAGE AEC ENGINEERS PRO SERV ENG SYSTEM SERV CO RECORDER SERVICE KEITH JOHNSON PERFORMANCE JOAN MICKSON PERFORMANCE JOHN MINCZESKI PERFORMANCE CHERYL SAWYER PERFORMANCE GRAZZINI BROS CO GENERAL SUPPLIES EVERETT McCLAY DONATION C WAYNE COURTNEY PRO SERV /SEPT TCS ENTERPRISES AMMUNITION WILLIAM BOWLER MEETING EXP WILLIAM BOWLER MILEAGE LeROY LISK MEETING EXP LeROY LISK MILEAGE AART GOKEY MILEAGE / .1 1 10 -02 -89 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 40- 4202 - 809 -80 40- 4202 - 809 -80 40- 4202 - 809 -80 40- 4202 - 809 -80 12 -4224- 434 -43 23- 1300 - 001 -00 I 10- 4208 - 480 -48 40- 4201 - 800 -80 2016 40- 4248 - 801 -80 01672 3581 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224- 781 -78. 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4201 - 781 -78 30- 4504 - 782 -78 3686 30- 4504 - 781 -78 30- 4201_ 782 -78 10- 4572 - 420 -42 2422 3219 10- 4206 - 440 -44 10- 4208 - 440 -44 10- 4206 - 440 -44 10- 4208 - 440 -44 40- 4208 - 806 -80 1 �.J 10 -02 -89 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 40- 4504 - 801 -80 10- 4504 - 520 -52 10 -4288- 510 -51 17922 40- 1330 - 000 -00 17921 3545 10- 4201 - 600 -60 30- 4224 - 781 -78 10- 4206 - 440 -44 30- 4201 - 781 -78 30- 4201 - 782 -78 10- 4922 - 506 -50 10- 4200 - 480 -48 3308 10- 4200 - 480 -48 3308 10- 4200 - 482 -48 3308 10- 4200 - 482 -48 919682 3208 10- 4510- 440 -44 3234 10- 4510 - 440 -44 3237 27- 4201 - 662 -66 848 3058 27- 4201 - 662 -66 849 3059 27- 4201 - 662 -66 3062 10- 4200 - 358 -30 1851 60- 1300 - 005 -20 10- 3180 - 000 -00 2 �lkwo 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 275721 09/18/89 12.95 MINN COMM RENTAL 12.95 * 275722 09/21/89 10.00 UNITED WAY MPLS UNITED WAY PINS 10.00 * 275723 09/21/89 139.00 BUSINESS MACH SALES SERVICE AGREEMENT 275723 09/21/89 499.00 BUSINESS MACH SALES TYPEWRITER 638.00 * 275724 09/21/89 84.00 JANE.WILIAMS SERVICES 84.00 * 275725 09/21/89 1,200.00 ESPECIALLY FOR RENTAL 1,200.00 * 275726 09/21/89 21.20 TERRENCE KEHOE MEETING EXP 21.20 * 275727 09/21/89 875.00 MICHELLE BERGMAN PRO SERV 875.00 * 275728 09/21/89 350.00 C WAYNE COURTNEY PRO SERV 350.00 * 275729 09/21/89 22,874.48 HENNEPIN COUNTY SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 22,874.48 * 275730 09/21/89 97.00- INGMAN LAB INC LAB SERVICES 275730 09/21/89 97.00 INGMAN LAB INC LAB SEVICES 275730 09/21/89 97.00 INGMAN LAB INC LAB SERVICES 97.00 275731 09/21/89 131.25 AMSCO REPAIRS 131.25 275732 09/21/89 207.00 SCIENTIFIC PROD DIV AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 207.00 275733 09/21/89 26.79 EMP AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 26.79 275734 09/21/89 80.00 LUCY M ROSCHE CLEANING 275734 09/21/89 80.00 LUCY M ROSCHE CLEANING 275734 09/26/89 80.00 LUCY M ROSCHE CLEANING 240.00 275735 09/21/89 4,384.00 MIDWEST AQUA CARE AQUATIC WEED CONTROL 4,384.00 *. 275736 09/21/89 1,503.73• CAIN OUSE ASSO INC CONSTRUCTION 1,503.73.* 275737 09/21/89 49.00 ELSIE V HAUGESAG AMBULANCE REFUND f �.J 10 -02 -89 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 40- 4504 - 801 -80 10- 4504 - 520 -52 10 -4288- 510 -51 17922 40- 1330 - 000 -00 17921 3545 10- 4201 - 600 -60 30- 4224 - 781 -78 10- 4206 - 440 -44 30- 4201 - 781 -78 30- 4201 - 782 -78 10- 4922 - 506 -50 10- 4200 - 480 -48 3308 10- 4200 - 480 -48 3308 10- 4200 - 482 -48 3308 10- 4200 - 482 -48 919682 3208 10- 4510- 440 -44 3234 10- 4510 - 440 -44 3237 27- 4201 - 662 -66 848 3058 27- 4201 - 662 -66 849 3059 27- 4201 - 662 -66 3062 10- 4200 - 358 -30 1851 60- 1300 - 005 -20 10- 3180 - 000 -00 2 i .J 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -02 -89 PAGE . 3 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 49.00 275738 09/21/89 71.80 AQUA CITY IRRIGATION SPRINKLER REPAIR 60- 1300 - 283 -04 71.80 275739 09/21/89 1,010.23 COMM OF PLANT INSPECTION 60- 1300 - 289 -04 77470 1,010.23 275740 09/21/89 50.00 MPLS MED RESEARCH SEMINAR 10- 4202 - 420 -42, 50.00 275741 09/21/89 176.25 STERLING FENCE FENCE REPAIR 40- 4248 - 803 -80 3675 176.25 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275743 09/21/89 20.00 ACTION TOWING JUMP START VEH 10- 4248 - 560 -56 2712 t 3457 ; 20.00 275744 09/21/89 89.84 CEDERGREN DESIGN REPAI RBLIND 28- 4248 - 702 -70 7039 2632 89.84 275745 09/21/89 1,066.91 MN DEPT OF JOBS UNEMPLOYMENT INS 10- 4160 - 510 -51 1,066.91 * 275746 09/21/89 1,150.00 WATER SPECIALTY CO POOL VACUUM 30- 1340 - 000 -00 1161 3403 1,150.00 * 275747 09/21/89 53.76 ABM EQUIPMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 3363 53.76 * . 275748 09/21/89 361.00 J &G POWER EQUIP AMSOIL 10- 4618 - 560 -56 3446 361.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275751 09/25/89 480.00 JOHN H EKLUND DUMP BRUSH 10- 4250 - 644 -64 3726 480.00 *. 275752 09/25/89 619.92 0 JOHN SCHIRMANG COFERENCE 10- 4202 - 490 -49 275752 09/26/89 302.00 0 JOHN SCHIRMANG CONFERENCE 10- 4202 - 490 -49 921.92 * 275753 09/25/89 221.72 DAVID BLOOD MEETING EXP 10- 4202 - 420 -42 221.72 * 275754 09/25/89 69.00 IAMFES DUES 10- 4204 - 480 -48 69.00 * 275755 09/25/89 25.00 SUE BLAIR ART DEMO 30- 4224 - 781 -78 25.00 * 275756 09/25/89 25.00 PHYLLIS HAYWA ART DEMO 30- 4224 - 781 -78 25.00 275757 09/25/89 25.00 MARIAN ALSTAD ART DEMO 30- 4224 - 781 -78 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -02 -89 PAGE 4 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 25.00 * 275758 09/25/89 25.00 BILL DIETRICHSON ART DEMO 30- 4224 - 781 -78 25.00 * 275759 09/25/89 25.00 BOB CONNOLLY ART DEMO 30- 4224 - 781 -78 25.00 * 275760 09/25/89 25.00 MARGARET GUST ART DEMO 30- 4224 - 781 -78 25.00 * 275761 09/25/89 40.00 MIKE HANEN SMITH REFUND 30- 3505 - 000 -00 40.00 275762 09/25/89 410.97 OBYRNE COSTUMES COSTUME 30- 4504 - 781 -78 410.97 * 275763 09/25/89 2,080.00 JOHN E OLSON CONTRACT INSPECTION 60- 1270 - 000 -00 2,080.00 * 275764 09/25/89 350.46 GTE SUN ADVERTISING 23- 4214 - 611 -61 3163 350.46 * 275765 09/25/89 86.24 TARGET CRAFT SUPPLIES 23- 4600 - 611 -61 063635 3162 86.24 * 275766 09/25/89 50.00 MIKE HALORAN REFUND 30- 3507 - 000 -00 50.00 275767 09/25/89 439.84 PROD CONSULTANT SYST GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 5273 3036 275767 09/25/89 350.00 PROD CONSULTANT SYST GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 560 -56 5273 3036 789.84 275768 09/25/89 96.50 SODERBERGS HRDW INC MAINTENANCE 50- 4248 - 841 -84 25198 3776 96.501* 275769 09/26/89 34.00 GARDEN DESIGN SUBSCRIPTION 10- 4504 - 644 -64 3788 34.00 * 275770 09/26/89 3,318.41 MIKE ANDREJKA FLOOR /STEPS 11- 4201 - 127 -12 3,318.41 * 275771 09/26/89 71.00 BILLIE MOIR CONFERENCE EXP 10- 4206 - 420 -42 71.00 * 275772 09/26/89 147.55 THE I ECONOMIC PRESS SUBSCRUPTION 10- 4502 - 420 -42 147.55 * 275773 09/26/89 70.00 B &D PRINTING GENERAL - SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 430 -42 1161 70.00 * 275774 09/26/89 50.00 THE PRINT SHOP PRINTING 10- 4600 - 420 -42 87808 50.00 * 275775 09/26/89 450.00 MURPHY ASSOC INC CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 89105 r 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 275776 09/26/89 275777 09/26/89 275777 09/26/89 275777 09/26/89 275778 09/26/89 275779 09/26/89 275779 09/26/89 275779 09/26/89 275779 09/26/89 275779 09/26/89 275779 09/26/89 275779 09/26/89 275779 09/26/89 275779 09/26/89 275779 09/26/89 275780 09/26/89 275781 09/26/89 275782 09/26/89 275783 09/26/89 275784 09/26/89 275785 09/26/89 275786 09/26/89 275786 09/26/89 275787 09/26/89 275788 09/26/89 275789 09/26/89 AMOUNT 450.00 *. 103.00 103.00 * 22.50 22.50 22.50 67.50 * 119.85 119.85 * 10.00 78.66 11.75 21.00 49.08 152.51 5.00 12.79 54.39 38.43 433.61 15.00 15.00 45.00 45.00 245.00 245.00 661.50 661.50 * 41.00 41.00 * 105.00 105.00 * 150.00 13.57. 163.57 * 75.00 75.00 * 38.75 38.75 * 80.00 .80.00 * CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 10 -02 -89 PAGE 5 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE AT &T DATA SERVICE EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274 - 420 -42 MPLS JAYCEES ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 822 -82 MPLS JAYCEES ADVERTISING 50 -4214- 842 -84 MPLS JAYCEES ADVERTISING 504214 - 862 -86 MN STATE REGISTER& COPIES 10- 4502- 420 -42 J WATERSTREET PD DUES 10- 4204- 420 -42 J WATERSTREET PD MEETING EXP 10- 4206 - 420 -42 J WATERSTREET PD MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 420 -42 J WATERSTREET PD LICENCES 10- 4310 - 560 -56 J WATERSTREET PD BOOKS 10- 4502- 420 -42 J WATERSTREET PD GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 J WATERSTREET PD GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 470 -47 J WATERSTREET PD PHOTO SUPPLIES 10- 4508 - 420 -42 J WATERSTREET PD AMMUNITION 10- 4572 - 420 -42 J WATERSTREET PD CABLE 12- 4504 - 434 -43 MALEFI CONFERENCE 10- 4202 - 420 -42 DAVID RADATZ REFUND 10- 4202 - 440 -44 AUDREY LAEHN AMBULANCE REFUND 10- 3180 - 000 -00 N LIGHTS PRO SHOP CLAY TARGETS 29- 4648 - 722 -72 22611 3391 MARGARET McDOWELL AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 ANDREW ZIMMER OFFICE ADMIN AC 23- 4120 - 611 -61 MARGARET GUST AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 MARGARET GUST CRAFT SUPPLIES 23- 4588 - 611 -61 DAVID ICE AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 SUSAN FRAME COST COMM 23- 4624 - 613 -61 AMY SMITH CLEANING 27- 4201 - 662 -66 N6,y 4 J1 A 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -02 -89 PAGE 6 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 275790 09/26/89 51.12 LYNN ANDERSON MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 600 -60 51.12 275791 09/26/89- 57.28 LYLE AXT REFUND 29- 4624 - 722 -72 57.28 2757,92 09/26/89 854.00 BRAEMAR PRO SHOP REIMBURSEMENT 10- 4504 - 100 -10 . 854.00 * ** -CKS 275A07 09/15/89 86.04 ALL -AMER BOTTLING MIX 50- 4632- 842 -84 86.04 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275A09 09/21/89 195.50 AAA LICENSE RENEWAL 10- 4310 - 560 -56 195.50 * * ** -CKS 275A15 09/21/89 33.50 ADAMS PEST CONTROL INSECT CONTROL 26- 4201 - 682 -68 33.50 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275A18 09/26/89 185.50— }m.ee —* ADT INC. SERVICE CONTRACTS 30- 4288 - 781 -78 3836 185.50 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275A34 09/21/89 340.80 ALLIED PLASTICS MATERIAL 10- 4504 - 301 -30 8274 3513 340.80 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275A39 09/21/89 59.00 ALTERNATOR REBUILD REPAIRS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 8834 3463 275A39 09/21/89 493.57 ALTERNATOR REBUILD ENGINE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 1711 3449 275A39 09/21/89 60.84 ALTERNATOR REBUILD BOLT CUTTER 10- 4580 - 560 -56 1713 3572 613.41 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275A41 09/26/89 310.99 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE MEAT 27- 4624 - 663 -66 275A41 09/25/89 502.12 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE MEAT 27- 4624 - 663 -66 8919 813.11 * * * * ** * ** -CKS o: 275A53 09/25/89 146.84 AMERICAN SHARECOM TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 146.84 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275A67 09/25/89 16.05 AQUA ENGINEERING IRRIGATION PARTS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 22631 3578 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 275A67 09/21/89 * * * * ** 275B05 09/25/89 275B05 09/25/89 275605 09/25/89 275805 09/25/89 275605 09/25/89 275805 09/25/89 275605 09/25/89 275806 09/25/89 275807 09/25/89 275607 09/15/89 275807 09/25/89 * * * * ** 275618 275B30 275B30 275830 275B30 275B30 275630 275630 275630 275830 275830 275630 275830 275630 275630 275830 275630 275630 275630 275630 * * * * ** 275632 * * * * ** 09/21/89 09/21/89 09/25/89 09/21/89 09/25/89 09/25/89 09/25/89 09/25/89 09/21/89 09/18/89 09/21/89 09/21/89 09/25/89 09/26/89 09/26/89 09/21/89 09/21/89 09/26/89 09/26/89 09/21/89 09/26/89 CHECK REGISTER 10 -02 -89 PAGE 7 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 430.26 AQUA ENGINEERING REPAIR SPRINKLER 60- 1300 - 286 -04 22569 446.31 * * * -CKS 9.60 EACH -BILL MEETING EXP 10- 4206 - 140 -14 6.78 BACH -BILL GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4204 - 782 -78 42.85 BACH -BILL POSTAGE 3074290- 781 -78 11.57 BACH -BILL GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 781 -78. 23.00 BACH -BILL OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516- 781 -78 2.99 BACH -BILL OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 14.00 BACH -BILL SOIL TESTING 30 -4660- 782 -78 110.79 * 64.75 BACHMANS TREES 10- 4560- 520 -52 161581 2875 64.75 * 962.85 BADGER METER INC WATER.METERS 40- 1220 - 000 -00 597711 1802 1,886.85 BADGER METER INC WATER METERS 40- 1220 - 000 -00 596278 1802 72.65 BADGER METER INC METER PARTS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 597559 1802 2,922.35 321.18 BATTERY WAREHOUSE BATTERIES 10- 4540 - 560 -56 58697 3209 321.18 96.54* BERTELSON BROS. INC.. SUPPLIES 10- 4504-- 510 -51 55.08 BERTELSON BROS. INC: BINDERS 10- 4504 - 160 -16 500656 3.36 BERTELSON BROS. INC. RULERS 10- 4504 - 200 -20 498480 5.80 BERTELSON BROS. INC. TAPE DISPENSER 10- 4504 - 301 -30 500656 18.31 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 500656 5.00 BERTELSON BROS. INC. MAGNETS 10- 4504 - 420 -42 500656 29.01 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 500656 117.60 BERTELSON BROS. INC. SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 498477 98.52 BERTELSON BROS. INC. CALENDARS 10- 4504 - 510 -51 498449 11.10 BERTELSON BROS. INC. ENVELOPES 10- 4504 - 520 -52 498478 98.32 BERTELSON BROS. INC. SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 628 -62 498477 27.61 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 140 -14 500656 9.17 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 501004 3835 9.12 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 501004 3835 16.76 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 3704 46.96 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 498142 3697 9.17- BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 501004 3835 140.82 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIS 30- 4516 - 781 -78 501038 3834 25.46 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 50- 4516 - 860 -86 498480 708.83 *(See also 375B30)* 77.94• BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS REPLACE PADLOCKS 27- 4248 - 667 -66 95879 3255 77.94 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 275B72 09/15/89 * * * * ** BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE 275B78 09/15/89 275678 09/15/89 * * * * ** BRISSMAN- KENNEDY 275B81 09/26/89 * * * * ** CLEANING SUPPLIES 275683 09/21/89 275683. 09/21/89 275883 09/21/89 275B83 09/21/89 275883 09/21/89 * * * * ** REPAIR PARTS 275C01 09/25/89 * * * * ** 52.50 275C08 09/21/89 * * * * ** BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC 275C25 09/21/89 275C25 09/21/89 275C25 09/25/89 * * * * ** 134.05 275C33 09/21/89 275C33 09/21/89 275C33 09/25/89 275C33 09/21/89 275C33 09/21/89 275C33 09/21/89 275C33 09/21/89 275C34 09/15/89 * * * * ** 10 -02 -89 PAGE 8 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4212 - 510 -51 10- 4504- 470 -47 133391 10- 4512 - 520 -52 135231 3603 i 27- 4201 - 664 -66 10- 4540 - 520 -52 10- 4561 - 642 -64 40- 4504 - 902 -90 40- 4504 - 902 -90 60- 1300 - 005 -20 23- 4624 - 613 -61 092546 3534 10- 4540 - 560 -56 P57804 3518 10- 4210 - 140 -14 104384 10- 4210 - 140 -14 104383 30•- 4214 - 781 -78 104877 3771 23- 4258 - 612 -61 27- 4258 - 662-66 27 -4258- 662 -66 27- 4258 - 664 -66 28- 4258 - 702 -70 28- 4258 - 702 -70 50- 4258 - 841 -84 41- 4252 - 900 -90 79034 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 70.40 BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE TRAINING 70.40 85.89 BRISSMAN- KENNEDY ANIMAL CONTROL SUP 337.46 _INC BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC CLEANING SUPPLIES 423.35 3,185.84 BRW INC. SERVICES 3,185.84 185.63 BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC REPAIR PARTS 307.43 BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC INFIELD MIXTURE 52.50 BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 721.38 BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,138.90 BRYAN ROCK PROD, INC CONSTRUCTION 3,405.84 134.05 C & S DISTRIBUTING COST /GOODS SOLD 134.05 16.20 CARLSON LK ST EQUIP. HOSSES 16.20 95.40 CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO. AD FOR BIDS 118.80 CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO AD FOR BIDS 48.94 CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO ADVERTISING 263.14 25.50 CITY OF EDINA WATER 717.65 CITY OF EDINA WATER 29.45. CITY OF EDINA WATER 20.50 CITY OF EDINA WATER 20.50 CITY OF EDINA WATER 20.50 CITY OF EDINA WATER 40.30 CITY OF EDINA WATER 874.40 182.62 CITY OF RICHFIELD LIGHT POWEWR 182..62 10 -02 -89 PAGE 8 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4212 - 510 -51 10- 4504- 470 -47 133391 10- 4512 - 520 -52 135231 3603 i 27- 4201 - 664 -66 10- 4540 - 520 -52 10- 4561 - 642 -64 40- 4504 - 902 -90 40- 4504 - 902 -90 60- 1300 - 005 -20 23- 4624 - 613 -61 092546 3534 10- 4540 - 560 -56 P57804 3518 10- 4210 - 140 -14 104384 10- 4210 - 140 -14 104383 30•- 4214 - 781 -78 104877 3771 23- 4258 - 612 -61 27- 4258 - 662-66 27 -4258- 662 -66 27- 4258 - 664 -66 28- 4258 - 702 -70 28- 4258 - 702 -70 50- 4258 - 841 -84 41- 4252 - 900 -90 79034 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 275C44 09/25/89 * * * * ** 275C65 09/21/89 * * * * ** 275C89 09/26/89 * * * * ** 275D05 09/15/89 * * * * ** 275D07 09/15/89 * * * * ** 275D33 09/26/89 275D33 09/26/89 * * * * ** MESSAGE 275D58 09/26/89 * * * * ** COKE 275D85 09/15/89 * * * * ** 275E14 09/21/89 * * * * ** 275E20 09/25/89 275E33 09/25/89 275E33 09/21/89 a CHECK REGISTER 10 -02 -89 PAGE 9 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 158.50 COCA COLA BOTTLING COKE 27- 4624 - 663 -66 8920 158.50 i I * ** -CKS 35.00 CONTACT MOBILE COMM REPAIR WORK 10- 4294 - 560 -56 12266 35.00 * ** -CKS F 85.94 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 40451 3550 R- 85.94 * ** -CKS 190.00 D. C. ANNIS SEWER PUMP SEPTIC /2 TANKS 10- 4248 - 646 -64 1476 3445 190.00 * ** -CKS 55.25 D. C. HEY CO. CONTRACT REPIARS 23- 4248 - 612 -61 128991 3160 55.25 * ** -CKS 215:25 DAVIS- EUGENE WEED INSPECTION 10- 4201 - 600 -60 51.12 DAVIS- EUGENE MILEAGE o 10- 4208 - 600 -60 266.37 * ** -CKS 257.70 DICTAPHONE CORP EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274 - 420 -42 257.70 * ** -CKS 1,278.75 DUFFEY PAPER CO. PAPER 10- 4504- 510 -51 918031 3482 1,278.75 * ** -CKS 31.05 EARL F. ANDERSON VEH REGULATORY 10- 4620 - 560 -56 90952 31.05 * L� * ** -CKS 85.00 ECOLAB PEST ELIM.' SEERVICE CONTRACT 30- 4288 - 782 -78 P69094 3767 85.00 * a * ** -CKS 13.00 EDINA CHAM OF COM LUNCH /CHAMBER 10- 4206 - 140 -14 10.00 EDINA CHAM OF COM BOOTH EXPENSE 30- 4516 - 781 -78 23.00 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -02 -89 PAGE 10 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275E75 09/18/89 230.00 EMPLOYEES CLUB SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 500 -50 230.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275F11 09/21/89 364.00 FEED RITE CONTROL WATER TREAT EQUIP 40- 4622- 805 -80 129155 3521 364.00 275G24 09/21/89 41.00* GEN. COMMUNICATIONS RADIO SERVICE i 10- 4248- 440 -44 54618 1325 * * * -CKS 275G24 09/21/89 19.00 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP RENTAL 10 -4226- 301 -30 31761 275G24 09/21/89 27.30 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS RADIO SERVICE 10- 4248 - 440 -44 54754 1325 275G24 09/21/89 41.00 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS RADIO SERVICE 10- 4248 - 440 -44 54618 1325 275G24 09/21/89 52.00 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS RADIO SESRVICE 10- 4248 - 440 -44 54619 1325 275G24 09/21/89 85.32 GEN: COMMUNICATIONS CONNECTORS 10- 4294 - 560 -56 53854 275G24 09/21/89 43.10 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS REPAIRS 10- 4294 - 560 -56 53766 275G24 09/21/89 266.25 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS MAINT CONTRACT 10- 4294 - 560 -56 31760 275G24 09/21/89' 111.90 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS ACCESSORYS 10- 4294 - 560 -56 53765 645.87 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275G26 09/25/89 2,051.58 GENERAL OFFICE PROD DIVIDERS 10- 4201 - 500 -50 230883 1770 275G26 09/25/89 19.80- GENERAL OFFICE PROD CREDIT 10- 4504 - 420 -42 2,031.78 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275G32 09/15/89 100.00 GOPHER STATE 1 CALL GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4248 - 646 -64 275G32 09/15/89 200.00 GOPHER STATE 1 CALL GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 275G32 09/15/89 632.35 GOPHER STATE 1 CALL CONTRACTED REPAIRS 40- 4248 - 801 -80 932.35 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275G42 09/26/89 144.40 GIL HEBARD GUNS TARGETS 29- 4648 - 722 -72 7829 3620 144.40 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275G44 09/25/89 50.00 GLEN SIPE PIANO SERV SERVICE CONTRACTS 30- 4288 - 782 -78 890921 3765 50.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275G46 09/26/89 50.00 GARVENS GREETINGS GIFT BAGS 50- 4514 - 842 -84 1930 275G46 09/26/89 25.00 GARVENS GREETINGS GIFT BAGS 50- 4514 - 862 -86 1931 75.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275G88 09/21/89 45.00 GRUBER POWER EQUIP TRIMER PARTS 10- 4540 - 641 -64 6133 3664 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -02 -89 PAGE 11 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 275G88 09/21/89 91.94 GRUBER POWER EQUIP MOWER PARTS 10- 4540 - 641 -64 6996 3494 275G88 09/21/89 28.00 GRUBER POWER EQUIP MOWER PARTS 10- 4540- 641 -64 6505 3666 275G88 09/21/89 56.00 GRUBER POWER EQUIP TRIMMER PARTS 10- 4540 - 641 -64 5919 2159 275G88 09/21/89 88.08 GRUBER POWER EQUIP MOWER /TRIMMER PARTS 10- 4540 - 643 -64 6535 3665 275G88 09/21/89 420.00 GRUBER POWER EQUIP WEED TRIMMERS 10- 4901 - 650 -64 5920 2158 729.02 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 5� 275H05 09/21/89 39.30 H.L. MOORE AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 10- 4510- 440 -44 622043 3236 39.30' * ** -CKS 275H09 09/25/89 1,040.22 HALLMAN OIL 10- 4618 - 560 -56 47139 3502 1,040.22 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275H30 09/26/89 372.37 HARMON GLASS & GLAZE REPALCE GLASS 27- 4288 - 669 -66 409834 3852 372.37 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275H63 09/15/89 47.25 HOFFERS INC PAINT FOR RINK 10- 4544 - 646 -64 68808 3489 275H63 09/15/89 493.25 HOFFERS INC FIELD PAINT 10- 4563 - 642 -64 68693 3294 540.50 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275H85 09/21/89 235.00 HUMPHREY RADIATOR REPAIR WORK 10- 4248 - 560 -56 3574 275H85 09/21/89 28.50 HUMPHREY RADIATOR SERVICE RADIATOR 10- 4540 - 560 -56 3487 275H85 09/21/89 32.50 HUMPHREY RADIATOR SERVICE RADIATOR 10- 4540 - 560 -56 3504 296.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275I23 09/15/89 26.72 INDELCO CORP IRRIGATION PARTS 10- 4504 - 643 -64 44748 3501 26.72 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275I59 09/15/89 32'.75 INTERIOR COM SYS. PHONE 10- 4256- 510 -51 24387 3688 T 275I59 09/15/89 414.50 INTERIOR COM SYS. TELEPHONE 30- 4256 - 782 -78 24897 3685 a 447.25 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275I61 09/21/89 396.62 INTERSTATE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 192380 3467 s! 275I61 09/21/89 224.48 INTERSTATE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 275I61 09/21/89 152.20 INTERSTATE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 3435 275I61 09/25/89 711.36 INTERSTATE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 3358 1,484.66 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -02 -89 PAGE 12 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 275J27 09/15/89 25.52 JERRYS FOODS GENERAL SUPPLIES 23- 4504- 611 -61 25.52 * ** -CKS * * * * ** 275J35 09/25/89 164.11 JERRYS PRINTING SUPPLIES PRINTING 10- 4504 - 510 -51 23 -4600- 611 -61 7407 7387 3769 3536 275J35 09/25/89 160.25 JERRYS PRINTING 324.36 ** *_CKS 275J74 09/21/89 266.52 JUSTUS LUMBER I'BLDG SUPPLIES BLDG SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 10 -4504- 647 -64 1480 4204 3034 3348 r 275J74 09/21/89 35.49 23.50- JUSTUS LUMBER JUSTUS LUMBER CREDIT 10- 4540 - 520 -52 4867 275J74 275J74 09/25/89 09/25/89 6.00 JUSTUS LUMBER MATERIAL 10- 4540 - 540 -54 95923 2623 284.51 * ** -CKS * * * * ** 275K23 09/26/89 563.27 KELLY SERVICES TEMP SERV 10- 4201 - 600 -60 563.27 * ** -CKS * * * * ** 275K35 09/18/89 10.29 KNOX COMM CREDIT MATERIAL 10- 4504 - 260 -26 542588 3438 275K35 09/18/89 27.36 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER SIDING 10- 4504 - 301 -30 10- 4528 - 314 -30 526468 531951 3559 3497 275K35 09/18/89 108.24 103.25 KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER 10- 4604 - 644 -64 542587 3437 275K35 275K35 09/15/89 09/25/89 81.72 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER 10- 4604- 646 -64 526493 3727 275K35 09/15/89 140.72 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER LUMBER 10- 4604 - 646 -64 27- 4604 - 664 -66 531851 532342 3495 3709 275K35 09/26/89 305.40 43.85 KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER 40- 4504 - 900 -80 542683 3365 275K35 09/18/89 820.83 * ** -CKS * * * * ** 275K38 09/25/89 41.44 KNUTSON -JIM MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 160 -16 41.44 * ** -CKS * * * * ** 275L06 09/25/89 670.00 LAKE RESTORATION WEED CONTROL 10 -4201- 358 -30 4031 3770 670.00' * ** -CKS * * * * ** 275L28 09/21/89 475.96 LAWSON PRODUCTS ,. PARTS STRAPS 10- 4504 - 322 -30 10- 4540 - 560 -56 3379 2942 275L28 275L28 09/25/89 09/21/89 594.09 381.56 LAWSON PRODUCTS LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 10- 4540-560 -56 3380 275L28 09/21/89 417.39 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 3377 1,869.00 * ** -CKS * * * * ** 275L30 09/15/89 4,552.50 LAYNE MINNESOTA CO. PUMP REPAIRS 40- 4248 - 801 -80 t 16783 3575 ___ .:� ..';.. —1, pry' A ,:: __ . - ,- - „"' y:. espy •,. v, .Y, q�,. -- •__ " " -- _— .._.. 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -02 -89 PAGE 13 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 275L30 09/25/89 1,428.70 LAYNE MINNESOTA CO. WELL PUMP PARTS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 16784 3558 5,981.20 * , * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275L32 09/25/89 14,612.00 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES DUES 10- 4204 - 140 -14 ,14,612.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275L42 09/26/89 255.00 LESCO SEED FOR TREES 27- 4562 - 664 -66 541095 3596 255.00 * * * * ** ** *.CKS 275L60 09/25/89 2,599.63 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 10- 4233 - 160 -16 275L60 09/25/89 725.10 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 10- 4233 - 200 -20 275L60 09/25/89 3,281.94 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 10- 4233 - 420 -42 275L60 09/25/89 1,649.55 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 40- 4233 - 800 -80 275L60 09/25/89 309.99 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 50- 4233 - 820 -82 275L60 09/25/89 310.00 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 50- 4233 - 840 -84 275L60 09/25/89 310.00 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 50- 4233 - 860 -86 9,186.21 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275L66 09/25/89 180:25 LONG LAKE FORD TRACT RENT SEEDER 10- 4201 - 643 -64 6440 3516 180.25 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275L80 09/21/89 18.00 LYNDALE GARDEN CTR GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 783 -78 27163 3687 18.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275L82 09/26/89 25.85 LYNDALE HARDWARE GARDENS SUPPLIES 30- 4660 - 782 -78 293941 3778 25.85 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275M02 09/21/89 41.21 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. HOSE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 98444 3661 275M02 09/21/89 155.30 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. MOTOR MOUNT 10- 4540 - 560 -56 98238 3194 196.51 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275M16 09/21/89 700.00 MCCAREN DESIGNS TREES /FLOWERS /SHRUBS 30- 4660 - 783 -78 1615 3403 700.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275M19 09/18/89 1,458.73 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 275M19 09/18/89 287.08 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 1,745.81 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO.' DATE - * * * * ** 275M23 09/21/89 275M23 09/21/89 275M23 09/21/89 * * * * ** 325 -00 275M25 09/21/89 * * * * ** 50- 4201 - 840 -84 275M27 69/21/89 275M27 09/25/89 275M27 09/21/89 275M27 09/21/89 275M27 09/21/89 275M27 09/15/89 275M27 09/26/89 275M27 09/25/89 275M27 09/15/89 275M27 09/21/89 275M27 09/26/89 275M27 09/26/89 275M27 09/26/89 * * * * ** 275M29 09/15/89 275M29 09/15/89 * * * * ** SUPPLIES 275M35 09/15/89 * * * * ** 508.50 275M42 09/25/89 275M42 09/15/89 275M42 09/25/89 275M42 09/18/89 275M42 09/15/89 275M42 09/18/89 275M42 09/15/89 275M42 09/18/89 275M42 09/25/89 * * * * ** CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 10 -02 -89 PAGE 14 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * * * -CKS 325.00 MARKETING FACTORS SERVICES 50- 4201 - 820 -82 325 -00 MARKETING FACTORS SERVICES 50- 4201 - 840 -84 325.00 MARKETING FACTORS SERVICES 50- 4201 - 860 -86 975.00 39.02 MED OXYGEN & EQUIP OXYGEN 10'4540- 440 -44 1324 39.02 237.00 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 10- 4512 - 540 -54 22532 3523 508.50 MERIT SUPPLY CONCRETE 10- 4528 - 301 -30 22332 3025 495.00 MERIT SUPPLY WASH /WAX 10- 4620 - 560 -56 22492 3439 467.50 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANER 10- 4620 - 560 -56 22555 3850 414.00 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 28- 4512 - 702 -70 22562 2988 497.05 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 30- 4512- 782 -78 22564 2628 249.65 MERIT SUPPLY' CLEANING SUPPLIES 30- 4512- 782 -78 22527 3789 452.60 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 30- 4512 - 782 -78 22599 3555 736.40 MERIT SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 30- 4540 - 782 -78 22493 3402 145.60 MERIT SUPPLY DEODORANT 40- 4504 - 801 -80 22473 3362 68.93 MERIT SUPPLY REPAIRS 50- 4248 - 821 -82 22527 3786 68.93 MERIT SUPPLY - REPAIRS 50- 4248 - 841 -84 22527 3789 68.94 MERIT SUPPLY REPAIRS 50- 4248 - 861 -86 22527 3789 4,410.10 218.13 MESSERLI & KRAMER AMBULANCE COLLECTION 10- 3180 - 000 -00 1851 78.98 MESSERLI & KRAMER AMBULANCE COLLECTION 10- 3180 - 000 -00 1852 297.11 220,257.78 METRO WASTE CONTROL SEWER CHARGE 40- 4312 - 812 -80 7154 220,257.78 4,009.83 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. SERVICES 10- 4201 - 647 -64 2424 126.04 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 301 -30 2269 230.67 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 301 -30 40.71 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 301 -30 350.21 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 301 -30 1929 841.77 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 314 -30 322.56 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 314 -30 1929 562.06 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. CONCRETE 10- 4528 - 365 -30 349.52 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 40- 4524 - 803 -80 2424 6,833.37 1989 CITY OF,EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 275M46 09/21/89 275M46 09/25/89 275M46 09/25/89 275M47 09/21/89 275M47 09/21/89 * * * * ** 275M57 09/15/89 * * * * ** PAGE 15 275M70 09/21/89 275M70 09/25/89 275M70 09/21/89 275M70 09/26/89 275M70 .09/21/89 275M70 09/21/89 275M70 09/26/89 275M70 09/26/89 * * * * ** 8925 275M76 09/21/89 * * * * ** BREAD 275M80 09/25/89 275M81 09/21%89 275M81 09/21/89 275M81 09/25/89 275M81 09/25/89 275M81 09/26/89 275M81 09/25/89 275M81 09/25/89 * * * * ** 275M93 09/26/89 * * * * ** 275M97 09/21/89 CHECK REGISTER 10 -02 -89 PAGE 15 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 1.45 METZ BAKING CO. HOT DOG BUNS 26- 4624 - 683 -68 172.60 METZ BAKING CO BREAD 27- 4624 - 663 -66 8925 158.29 METZ BAKING CO BREAD 27- 4624 - 663 -66 8925 332.34 162.28 MIDWAY IND SUPPLY PARTS 10- 4504- 560 -56 101414 3376 44.65 MIDWAY IND SUPPLY PARTS 10- 4504 - 560 -56 101191 3360 206.93 * ** -CKS 1,875.48 MILLER - DUNWIDDIE ARCHITECT SERV 60- 1300 - 015 -20 8345 3680 1,875.48 * ** -CKS 108.50 MN. CONWAY FIRE EXT INSPECTION 10- 4504- 440 -44 136150 3566 15.75 MN. CONWAY FIRE SAFETY INS 10- 4504 - 646 -64 3777 167.25 MN. CONWAY FIRE EXT INSPECTION 10- 4540 - 540 -54 136726 3370 75.25 MN. CONWAY SAFETY EQUIP 10- 4642 - 420 -42 136729 1,720.00 MN. CONWAY 4 -TURN OUT GEAR 10- 4901 - 440 -44 13178 1577 106.75 MN. CONWAY INSPECTION 40- 4504 - 802 -80 136735 3375 45.50 MN. CONWAY FIRE EXT SERV 50- 4248 - 821 -82 136737 10.50 MN. CONWAY FIRE EXT SERV 50- 4248 - 841 -84 136736 2,249.50 * ** -CKS 163.32 MN. GLOVE GLOVES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 34962 3368 163.32 * ** -CKS 68.40 MN SUBURBAN NEWS WANT AD 10- 4212 - 510 -51 68.40 84.67 MN. TORO INC. PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 782289 3473 6.92 MN. TORO INC. BALL JOINT 10- 4540 - 560 -56 782285 3472 276.48 MN. TORO INC. IRRIGATION PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 780031 3224 .89.20 MN. TORO INC. MOWER PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 780759 3304 42.50 MN. TORO INC. IRRIGATION PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 785023 3758 72.46- MN. TORO INC. CREDIT 27- 4540 - 664 -66 C96830 122.58 MN. TORO INC. MOWER PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 780763 3256 549.89 * ** -CKS 128.00 MOTOROLA EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274 - 420 -42' 128.00 * ** -CKS 6,436.18 MPLS FINANCE DEPT. WATER 40- 4640 - 803 -80 6,436.18 �o 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 275M98 09/21/89 * * * * ** 275N01 09/26/89 275N01 09/26/89 * * * * ** VENDOR 275N13 09/26/89 275N13 09/26/89 * * * * ** GAS LINE 275N16 09/15/89 * * * * ** 275N21 09/21/89 275N21 09121/89 275N21 09/21/89 275N31 09/25/89 * * * ** 275N48 09/25/89 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275N62 09/26/89 * * * * ** 29 -4648- 722 -72 275N72 09/18/89 * * * * ** 661.50 275N82 09/15/89 275N82 09/15/89 2967 �o * ** -CKS CHECK REGISTER 10 -02 -89 PAGE 16 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 6,512.00 MINNEGASCO GAS LINE 60- 1300 - 005 -20 6,512.00 * ** -CKS 661.50 MPLS GUN CLUB PRO SH CLAY TARGETS 29 -4648- 722 -72 2402 2203 661.50 MPLS GUN CLUB PRO SH CLAY TARGETS 29- 4648- 722 -72 2401 2967 1,323.00 i * ** -CKS 43.45 MUZAK ADVERTSING 50- 4214 - 822 -82 .43.45 MUZAK ADVERTSING 50- 4214 - 862 -86 86.90 * i * ** -CKS 70.93 N.S.P. COMPANY NSP 40- 4252 - 801 -80 70.93 * ** -CKS 42.02- NAPA AUTO PARTS CREDIT 10- 4540 - 560 -56 475103 62.22 NAPA AUTO PARTS REPAIR•PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 604359 3465 4.32 NAPA AUTO PARTS FUEL FILTERS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 606126 3570 24.52 * ** -CKS 171.00 NEBCO DISTRIBUTING CONCESSIONS 28- 4624 - 703 -70 012494 9746 171.00 * ** -CKS 1,896.00 NO STAR TURF SOD CUTTER 10- 4901 - 305 -30 164550 3354 1,896.00 * ** -CKS 950.00 NORTHLAND ELEC SUP GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 101246 2217 950.00 * ** -CKS t 1,398.33 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES 10- 4616 - 560 -56 1,398.33 * ** -CKS 57.27 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 163689.3161 237.89 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 163688 3158 295.16 * * ** -CKS b � 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -02 -89 PAGE 17 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 275017 275017 09/21/89 09/21/89 38.00 102.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPUTER SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 090429 140.00 COMPUTER CABLES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 090707 3431 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275024 275024 09/26/89 09/26/89 270.00 456.00 OFFSET PRINTING OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING 10- 4600 - 420 -42 30232 1350 275024 09/26/89 274.00 OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING PRINTING 10- 4600 - 420 -42 10- 4600 - 420 -42 30231 30230 1350 1350 1,000.00 * * * * ** ** *-CKS 275036 09/25/89 20.16 OLSON CHAIN & CABLE NYLON SLING 10- 4580 - 646 -64 91864 3579 20.16 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275050 09/21/89 70.75 OWENS SERVICE CO PROF SERV 30- 4201 - 782 -78 40773 3401 70.75 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275P11 275P11 09/21/89 09/21/89 316.60 68.00 PARK NIC MED CTR PARK NIC MED CTR PHYSICAL 10- 4212 - 510 -51 384.60 HEARING TEST 40- 4201 - 800 -80 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275P35 09/21/89 85.10 PETERSON- BARBARA MILEAGE 30- 4208 - 781 -78 85.10 * ** -CKS 275P48 09/21/89 22.10 PIP PRINTING PRINTING 30- 4600- 781 -78 5490 3707 22.10 * * ** -CKS 275P77 09/21/89 189.25 PREST EQUIPMENT TIRE 10- 4540- 560 -56 3967 3970 189.25 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275P80 275P80 09/15/89 09/15/89 205.41 303.89 PRIOR LAKE AGG. PRIOR LAKE AGG. SAND /GRAVEL /ROCK 10- 4522 - 314 -30 509.30 FILL MATERIAL 40 -4518- 803 -80 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275Q20 09/21/89 68.88 QUICK SERV BATTERY FRAM CORP 10- 4540 - 560 -56 32993 3444 68.88 *. * * * * ** * ** -CKS py� 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -02 -89 PAGE 18 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 275Q22 09/25/89 107.16 QUIK PRINT. PRINTING 27- 4600 - 661 -66 17530 3757 107.16 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275R22 09/15/89 72.72 REM SUPPLIES WORK GLOVES /TREES 10- 4504 - 644 -64 7660 3383 72.72 * ** -CKS 275R25 09/15/89 50.75 RENTAL EQUIP & SALES REPAIR SAW 10- 4248 - 644 -64 10148 3640 50.75 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275R33 09/15/89 8,345.15 REX DISTR. BEER 50- 4630 - 842 -84 8,345.15 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275R43 09/21/89 82.84 RITEWAY PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 3515 82.84 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275R49 09/15/89 193.67 ROAD RESCUE AMBULANCE PACK 10- 4510 - 440 -44 080164 3242 275R49 09/21/89 66.00 ROAD RESCUE FIRST AID SUPPLIES 10 -4540- 440 -44 090140 3243 275R49 09/15/89 4,200.00 ROAD RESCUE EQUIP REPLACE 10- 4901- 420 -42 60131B 2978 275R49 09/21/89 156.36 ROAD RESCUE LIGHGT BARS 10- 4901 - 440 -44 090116 3232 4,616.03 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275R79 09/25/89 893.25 RTW INC. FEE FOR SERVICE 10- 4260 - 510 -51 893.25 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275R83 09/21/89 112.50 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON VALVE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 059111 3183 275R83 09/21/89 490.47 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON VALVE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 059112 3182 275R83 09/21/89 22.92 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON BALL JOINT 10- 4540 - 560 -56 058826 3018 275R83 09/21/89 503.83- RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON CREDIT 10- 4540 - 560 -56 58992 8152 122.06 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275S11 09/15/89 214.00 SCHMIDT MUSIC •MUSIC MATERIAL 10- 4596 - 627 -62 214.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275516 09/21/89 26.08 SEARS ROEBUCK.& CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 3548 26.08 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF.EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -02 -89 PAGE 19 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 275527 09/21/89 114.70 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT THINNER 10- 4544 - 325 -30 76204 3462 114.70 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275534 275S34 09/18/89 09/18/89 9.04 11.26 SOUTHDALE FORD SOUTHDALE FORD PARTS PARTS HOSE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 217907 275S34 09/18/89 77.67 SOUTHDALE FORD PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10- 4540 - 560 -56 217177 217903 275534 09/18/89 33.46 SOUTHDALE FORD SWITCH ASSY 10- 4540 - 560 -56 216794 131.43 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275545 275S45 09/21/89 09/21/89 59.39 229.00 ST. PAUL BOOK GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 140 -14 959647 288.39 ST. PAUL BOOK CHAIR 50- 4504 - 841 -84 958873 3708 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275554 09/21/89 120.65 STAR TRIBUNE WANT ADS 10- 4212 - 510 -51 120.65 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275567 09/26/89 3,125.00 STORE FRONT HUMAN SERVICES 10- 4201 - 504 -50 112310 3,125.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275572 275S72 09/15/89 09/15/89 840.00- 230.58 STREICHERS STREICHERS CREDIT 10- 4266 - 420- 42- M55162 275572 09/15/89 609.42 STREICHERS UNIFORM ALLOWANCE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 420 -42 10- 4266 - 420 -42 M63971 M63964 3350 9503 275S72 275S72 09/15/89 09/15/89 39.32 132.75 STREICHERS STREICHERS GENERAL SUPPLIS 10- 4504 - 420 -42 M63971 3350 172.07 AMMUNITION 10- 4572`- 420 -42 M64341 * ** -CKS 275577 275577 09/18/89 09/25/89 177.50 1,211.05 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET BODY REPAIR BODY WORK 10- 4248 - 560 -56 6169 275S77 09/18/89 246.00 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET BODY REPAIR 10- 4248 - 560 -56 10 -4248- 560 -56 5941 6170 3287 275577 275S77 09/18/89 09/18/89 246.94 31.80 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET COMPRESSOR 10- 4540 - 560 -56 113583 275S77 09/18/89 187.16 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SOLENOID REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10- 4540 - 560 -56 113855 113045 275S77 275S77 09/18/89 09/18/89 21.19 34.60 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET DOOR ORNAMENT 10-4540- 560 -56 113562 275S77 09/18/89 20.13 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUPT KI COVER 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10- 4540 - 560 -56 113368 113153 275S77 275577 09/18/89 09/26/89 25.88 10,650.00 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CHAIN CAR 10- 4540 - 560 -56 113523 12,852.25 10- 4901 - 440 -44 55667 1861 275578 09/15/89 33.25 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP HARDWARE 10- 4540 - 646 -64 3464 33.25 * * * * ** * ** -CKS Nmol 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 275583 09/26/89 * * * * ** 275592 09/21/89 * * * * ** 275T11 09/25/89 275T11 09/25/89 275T11 09/15/89 275T11 09/25/89 * * * * ** 54.61 275T13 09/26/89 275T13 09/26/89 275T13 09/26/89 * * * * ** 54.61 275T16 09/26/89 * * * * ** 275T53 09/21/89 * * * * ** 275T74 09/15/89 275T74 09/21/89 275T74 09/21/89 275T74 09/15/89 * * * * ** 275T91 09/21/89 * * * * ** 3692 275V15 09/21/89 275V15 09/15/89 275V15 09/15/89 * * * * ** CHECK REGISTER 10 -02 -89 -PAGE 20 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 54.61 SUPERAMERICA PROPANE 10- 4504 - 301 -30 54.61 * ** -CKS 53.78 SYSTEM SUPPLY SUPPLIES 10 -4594- 510 -51 090483 3692 53.78 * ** -CKS 132.04 TESSMAN SEED & CHEM. LSCAPE /HDWR 10- 4504 - 643 -64 33768 3343 410.00 TESSMAN SEED & CHEM. GRASS SEED 10- 4568 - 643 -64 33866 3514 135.00 TESSMAN SEED & CHEM. GRASS SEED 10- 4568 - 643 -64 33628 3257 131.50 TESSMAN SEED & CHEM. GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 783 -78 34440 3483 808.54 *. * ** -CKS 630.00 TOM HORWATH ASSESSING INSP 10- 4105 - 980 -64 "975.00 TOM HORWATH FORESTRY 10- 4201 - 644 -64 119.52 TOM HORWATH MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 644 -64 1,724.52 * ** -CKS 67.48 TIERNEY BROS INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 36957 67.48 * ** -CKS 7,639.32 TRACY OIL GASOLINE 10- 4612 - 560 -56 T13121 7,639.32 * ** -CKS 480.00 TURF SUPPLY CO. GRASS SEED 10- 4568 - 643 -64 27702 3296 206.25 TURF SUPPLY CO. SEED 27- 4562 - 664 -66 27921 3426 1,244.00 TURF SUPPLY CO. CHEMICALS 27- 4564- 664 -66 27921 3426 9.50 TURF SUPPLY CO. SOIL TEST 60- 1300 - 005 -20 277979 3639 1,939.75 * ** -CKS 503.70 TWIN CITY TESTING TESTING 10- 4201 - 440 -44 3244 503.70 * ** -CKS 421.93 VAN PAPER CO. SUPPLIES 10- 4514 - 520 -52 275313 3635 2,925.00 VAN PAPER CO. PAPER CUPS 27- 4624 - 663 -66 270603 9321 695.00 VAN PAPER CO. PAPER CUPS 28- 4624 - 703 -70 270603 9321 4,041.93 * ** -CKS 10 -02 -89 PAGE 21 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 30- 4504 - 782 -78 010803 3698 * ** -CKS 27- 4276 - 665 -66 3793 3551 27- 4540 - 665 -66 5770 2970 27- 4540 - 665 -66 5768 2970 27- 4540 - 665 -66 5855 3170 * ** -CKS 40- 4540 - 805 -80 6353 .2264 40- 4540 - 805 -80 6354 2265 * ** -CKS 27- 4612 - 664 -66 42774 3632 27- 4612 - 666 -66 42148 3076 * ** -CKS 40- 4248 - 801 -80 100234 3496 40- 4540 - 801 -80 100351 3536 * ** -CKS 10- 4250 - 301 -30 10- 4250 - 440 -44 10- 4250 - 520 -52 10- 4250 - 540 -54 10- 4250 - 645 -64 10- 4250 - 645 -64 23- 4250 - 312 -61 23- 4250 - 312 -61 23- 4250 - 612 -61 26- 4250 - 682 -68 27- 4250 - 662 -66 27- 4250 - 664 -66 28- 4250 - 702 -70 30- 4250 - 782 -78 50- 4250 - 841 -84 50- 4250 - 861 -86 * ** -CKS 40- 4540- 803 -80 097226 2750 * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 275V30 09/21/89 68.67 VANTAGE ELECTRIC GENERA SUPPLIES 68.67 * * * * ** 275V43 09/15/89 490.00 VERSATILE VEHICLE RENTAL 275V43 09/21/89 98.67 VERSATILE VEHICLE CAART PARTS 275V43 09/21/89 28.55 VERSATILE VEHICLE CART PARTS 275V43 09/21/89 148.11 VERSATILE VEHICLE CART PARTS 765.33 * * * * ** 275V46 09/18/89 3,312.00 VESSCO CHLORIATOR 275V46 09/18/89 3,312.00 VESSCO CHLORINATOR 6,624.00 * * * * ** 275W11 09/25/89 441.21 W. GORDON SMITH GASOLINE 275W11 09/21/89 489.77 W. GORDON SMITH GASOLINE 930.98 * * * * ** 275W13 09/15/89 2,254.92 WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP PUMP REPAIRS 275W13 09/15/89 21.75 WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP PUMP WASHER 2,276.67 * * * * ** 275W25 09/15/89 426.76 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE 275W25 09/15/89 83.14 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE 275W25 09/15/89 91.30 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE 275W25 09/15/89 426.76 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE 275W25 09/15/89 115.00 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE 275W25 09/15/89 88.55 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE 275W25 09/15/89 27.71 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE 275W25 09/15/89 27.71- WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE 275W25 09/15/89 27.71 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE 275W25 09/15/89 128.00 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE 275W25 09/15/89 332.54 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE 275W25 09/15/89 76.75 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE 275W25 09/15/89 166.40 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE 275W25 09/15/89 166.40 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE 275W25 09/15/89 61.00 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE 275W25 09/15/89 30.50 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE 2,220.81 *. * * * * ** 275W28 09/21/89 119.00 WATER PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 119.00 * * * * ** 10 -02 -89 PAGE 21 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 30- 4504 - 782 -78 010803 3698 * ** -CKS 27- 4276 - 665 -66 3793 3551 27- 4540 - 665 -66 5770 2970 27- 4540 - 665 -66 5768 2970 27- 4540 - 665 -66 5855 3170 * ** -CKS 40- 4540 - 805 -80 6353 .2264 40- 4540 - 805 -80 6354 2265 * ** -CKS 27- 4612 - 664 -66 42774 3632 27- 4612 - 666 -66 42148 3076 * ** -CKS 40- 4248 - 801 -80 100234 3496 40- 4540 - 801 -80 100351 3536 * ** -CKS 10- 4250 - 301 -30 10- 4250 - 440 -44 10- 4250 - 520 -52 10- 4250 - 540 -54 10- 4250 - 645 -64 10- 4250 - 645 -64 23- 4250 - 312 -61 23- 4250 - 312 -61 23- 4250 - 612 -61 26- 4250 - 682 -68 27- 4250 - 662 -66 27- 4250 - 664 -66 28- 4250 - 702 -70 30- 4250 - 782 -78 50- 4250 - 841 -84 50- 4250 - 861 -86 * ** -CKS 40- 4540- 803 -80 097226 2750 * ** -CKS Smoo 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -02 -89 PAGE 22 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 275W66 09/18/89 14.95 WILLIAMS STEEL GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 646 -64 275W66 09/18/89 134.07 WILLIAMS STEEL PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 275W66 09/18/89 28.71 WILLIAMS STEEL GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 177.73 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275W76 09/26/89 140.23 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY PARTS 27- 4540 - 666 -66 95593 3419 140.23 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 275Z14 09/21/89 342.04 ZIEGLER INC PARTS _ 10- 4540 - 560 -56 3468 342.04 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 2798-38 99"21"89 6- 41.62 f L- sAN —BRes . l tL'-- 86RTE66Gpi BRE)s. ipiG. BE E-R Ab SUPPLIES GFFIGE SUPPLIES iE) 4504-5-10-51-498-4-80— 38 45i6 781 ?8 499153 3703 279BOG gg,/al�sg qq,'21�89 i6.46 BERTELSE)Pi BRE)S. ipie. GFF!eE SUPPEIES 38 45i B-1-7 -• -3704 -27g 8 }-7-8 -- -3 -704- •- 279B39 09/21/89 41.62 BERTE668N- 8ROS ---1446. - GFFIGE SUPP61ES 90 4r1-&-7-8i8--- 499- 15- 3- .3703-- 96.54 * * * * ** 279G24 gq�21/8o- 99 GEN. GGMMUNIGATIONG REPAIRS 19 4294 569 56 53229 * ** -CKS * * * * ** - A . i * ** -CKS 375B30 09/21/89 41.62 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 499153 3703 41.62 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 128,356.06 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 3,318.41 FUND 11 TOTAL C.D.B.G. 3,944.68 FUND 12 TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS 5,615.00 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER 162.95 FUND 26 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUND 13,859.13 FUND 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND 1,577.24 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND 2,186.18 FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND 10, 616.01 — 46 --6is . 51 FUND 30 TOTAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 250,316.84 _ FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND 182.62 FUND 41 TOTAL STORM SEWER UTILITY 11,311.14 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 15,631.90 FUND 60 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 447,078.16* TOTAL