Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1989-10-16_COUNCIL PACKET
* * * * * * AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER.16, 1989 7:00 P.M. (Convene Joint HRA /Council Meeting) ROLLCALL I. APPROVAL OF HRA MINUTES OF OCTOBER 2, 1989 (HRA) II. EDINBOROUGH -.HAWTHORN HOTEL DEVELOPMENT A. Amendment to Final Development Plan (Council) B. Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 825 -A31 - To Allow Hotels as a Principal Use in Mixed Development District (Council) C. Amendment to Redevelopment Agreement - Edinborough (HRA) III. 50TH AND FRANCE IMPROVEMENTS (HRA) IV. ACCEPTANCE OF OUTLOT A - VILLAGE HOMES OF CENTENNIAL LAKES '(HRA) V. ADJQUR�T EDINA CITY COUNCIL I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Council member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of October 2, 1989 and Special Meetings of August 8 and August 10, 1989 III. ADOPTION OF 1990 BUDGET (Continue to 12/4/89) IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. First Reading - Amendments to Subivision and Zoning Ordinances 1. Ordinance No. 804 - Regulating Plats and Subdivisions 2. Ordinance No. 825 -A30 - Requiring Larger Minimum Lot Areas and Dimensions for Certain Lots in the R -1 District B. Second Reading - Sign Ordinance Amendment No. 451 -A6 - To Add Requirements for MDD -5 District - Edinborough, and MDD -6 District - Centennial Lakes C. First Reading - Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 825 -A31 - To Allow Private Clubs in the PC -1 Commercial District V. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS VI. AWARD OF BIDS A. Storm Sewer Improvement Nos. STS -195, STS -196 and STS -200 (Contd from 10/2/89) B. Concrete Sidewalk Improvement Nos. S -43, 5 -44 and 5 -46 C. (1) Dry Electrostatic Transfer Copier (Continue to 11/6/89) D. Re- Roofing - Braemar Golf Course Clubhouse E. Hydraulic Hammer Attachment F. Tree Replacement - Braemar Golf Course Agenda Edina City Council October 16, 1989 Page 2 VII. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Approval of Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of October 10, 1989 B. Recommendations - Park Board Minutes of October 10, 1989 C. Report /Recommendation - White Oaks Lots D. Fees and Charges - Water & Sewer Rate Increases E. Appointment - Community Development and Planning Commission F. Off -Sale Beer License - Country Store G. Approval of Laboratory Services Agreement - Hennepin County H. Temporary On -Sale Liquor License - The Edina Foundation I. Set Hearing Date - Beer License Fees (11/06/87) VIII. COMMUNICATIONS A. Larry Laukka Letter - Centennial Lakes Phase IV IX. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES A. AMM Policies and Legislative Proposals - 1990 X. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL XI. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANOUS ITEMS XII. FINANCE A.. Resolution Cancelling Levy for 1990 on $5,400,000 G.O. Improvement Bonds, Series 1984 B. Resolution Cancelling Levy for 1990 on $2,200,000 G.O. Redevelopment Bonds C. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 10/16/89: General Fund $240,253.94, C.D.B.G. $6,211.00, Art Center $11,232.03, Capital Fund $153.40, Swimming Pool Fund $102.76, Golf Course Fund $20,132.95, Recreation Center Fund $7,005.49, Gun Range Fund $300.62, Edinborough Park $9,464.48, Utility Fund $20,304.17, Storm Sewer Utility $2,084.62, Liquor Dispensary Fund $113,424.97, Construction Fund $809,593.06, Total $1,240,263.49. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Mon Nov 6 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Fri Nov 10 VETERANS DAY - City Hall Closed Sat Nov 18 Edina Foundation Benefit (Dynamite Jazz '89) 6 :30 p.m. Edinborough Park Mon Nov 20 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Thurs Nov 23) THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY - City Hall Closed Fri Nov 24) Mon Dec. 4 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Mon Dec 18 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Mon Dec 25 CHRISTMAS DAY - City Hall Closed N A• o e vi • POFL � �• 18.18 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: HRA /COUNCIL Agenda Item # HRA /COUNCIL II. From: GORDON L. HUGHES Consent ❑ ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER Information Only ❑ Date: OCTOBER 16, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ x To HRA S_ ubject: 0 To Council ' EDINBOROUGH - HAWTHORN HOTEL DEVELOPMENT Action ❑Motion ❑ Resolution - 0 Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: 1. Approve Final Development Plan 2. Approve Amendment to Zoning Ordinance permitting suites hotels in the Mixed Development District 3. Authorize execution of the Hotel Development Agreement and related documents 4. Amend the sign ordinance to address commercial building signage in the Mixed Development District Info /Background: On April 17, and May 1, 1989, the HRA and City Council conducted public hearings on the proposal of Hawthorn Suites to construct an extended stay hotel at Edinborough. Following the May 1, hearing, the matter was continued to the the May 15, 1989, agenda. Hawthorn Suites requested a postponement of the May 15, hearing and subsequently requested an indefinite continuance of the project. Since last July, staff and representatives of Hawthorn Suites have met on several occasions concerning the project. Hawthorn has now requested a hearing and requests final approval of the development plan and redevelopment agreement. Notice of this hearing has been sent to effected property owners. Attached are letters that we have received concerning the project.. From a zoning standpoint, the final development which is now proposed is identical to that reviewed by the City Council last May. Attached for your review are copies of the May 1, 1989, staff report which include the proposed site plan and other supporting information as well as the project signage proposal. Also enclosed for your review is a copy of the May 1, 1989, HRA and City Council Minutes which include the discussion of the proposed plan and project signage. Again, the plan presently proposed for the development is identical to that reviewed last spring. 0 HRA /COUNCIL - EDINBOROUGH - HAWTHORN HOTEL DEVELOPMENT October 16, 1989 Page Two REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT The proposed hotel development agreement, easement agreement and covenants agreement were presented to the HRA last May. Based upon our discussions with Hawthorn representatives during the past two months, several material changes to these agreements are proposed: PARKING LOT: The Zoning Ordinance would require the construction of 157 parking spaces for the hotel. The hotel is proposing to construct approximately 186 spaces or 29 spaces more that code requirement. Staff proposes that the HRA contribute $2,000 per parking stall for the 29 additional stalls. In exchange, the hotel will grant the City a non - exclusive easement for public parking over 86 spaces. The hotel would be responsible for the on -going maintenance and upkeep of all parking spaces. PARKING RAMP: Staff proposes that we withdraw our requirement that the HRA be given a reservation to construct a future parking ramp on the hotel site. We believe that the non - exclusive parking easement provided on the hotel parking lot will satisfy present and future parking needs. PARK MAINTENANCE FEE: A monthly park maintenance fee of $15 /room would be paid to the City. This fee would be increased in the future, by the lesser of the consumer price index or the percentage increase in the hotel's gross revenues. We would also agree that if the City ever'levied a special tax on hotel rooms, the annual increase in park maintenance fees would cease and the,monthly fee would return to $15 /room. PAYMENT AND PERFORMANCE BOND: Hawthorn Suites is prepared to submit Payment and Performance Bond which guarantees that the hotel will, in fact, be constructed. In exchange, they request that our rights of reversion and rights to re- purchase the property be eliminated from the agreement. We concur with this request. The proposed purchase price of the property remains unchanged at $1,127,903. This price includes reimbursements to the HRA, park dedication fees and special assessments, and also provides at completion of the hotel a $50,000 contribution to the City. The HRA would agree to construct the public sidewalk across the hotel lot, as well as the commuter strip /service drive located north of the hotel. These HRA obligations are the same as those proposed in the original redevelopment agreement. As you know, the City and the State's liquor laws have been discussed in detail at past Council meetings. We now believe that the hotel understands fully the effect of our liquor laws on their operation. Although the sale of liquor by the drink is not permitted in the hotel, Hawthorn Suites understands that they may provide a deli -very service of package liquor to guests in their hotel rooms. This service would be similar to the delivery of groceries, dry - cleaning, and other items that the hotel would routinely f HRA /COUNCIL - EDINBOROUGH - HAWTHORN HOTEL DEVELOPMENT October 16, 1989 Page Three provide to their guests. We believe that this service can be performed within the confines of our liquor laws. ACTIONS REQUIRED:. The Council /HRA should take the following actions if they wish to a approve this project. 1) The Edinborough Final Development Plan should be amended in accordance with the proposed hotel development plan. 2) The Zoning Ordinance should be amended to allow suites hotels as a principal use in a mixed development district. A proposed amendment is attached. 3) The HRA should adopt the attached Resolution which ratifies and affirms the Redevelopment Agreement ;and other agreements and authorizes the Chairman and Secretary to execute such agreements. 4) The Council should amend the sign ordinance to address commercial signage in the mixed development district. This amendment could be considered in connection with the Centennial Lakes amendments which are proposed later in the agenda. I oil U � a nGa�der�r � ���ec�gk � ��d ��� +� �,�+:aa imy tin ^� m���� --fMc_ ot �p �u D �d,a o euve�k � c�,+,�d ���`� �i fur (,�z� ��"'n' � �� , �) ��7�iiva�Fk� �� -h Can �*�',�"e� �,�nnC,�, 4L PJ1A UP, did -- ..,,,aa9 c R,e Cy ,IV jo Dec-r C4! Ciz) nC-J- Mcfn tie eS, re— C�, ctf -74 vz.-7Le- ve. h .4-Ae- yv) net 11 c� ri��oLd iC4 yz,5 7TY-YL c) 6 c- r—\ Q v n F"-\ e- i j-N C., A-, -ILe n J. e- e, cl ( . ^C, GL)'\j e- C-- &.- r\ . I-cy 2 c- V o 1 ° �/ taC V G-/ 41 y o 4. ✓ li d 1 oh +fh`� � l ol,•,.c . VT 71 Kc, V S.J 35 IRE CEIYED GGT ? u 190 October 11, 1989 City of Edina, Minnesota City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Re: Edinborough Site Hawthorn Edina, Inc. /Hyatt Development Corporation Dear City Council Members: I am a resident of 7635 Edinborough Way and am strongly opposed to approving the hotel development for Hawthorn Edina, Inc. and to amending the Zoning Ordinance No. #25 to allow a hotel as principal use in the MDD -5 District. I purchased my Village Home two years ago with the understanding that the proposed development was going to be an office building complex, not a hotel. I never would have purchased my home at Edinborough if I would have known a hotel was planned for that site. This is a residential area and it should stay that way. Has anyone considered how the development will impact the value of the Edinborough Homes located less than 120 feet from the proposed hotel? As a resident of Edina, I do not think the City of Edina needs to allow a hotel to be built within the city limits. There is an over abundance of hotels within a two mile area, of 494 and Hwy 100. The city is asking for more traffic, loitering, and vandalism in the area and increased congestion of the Edinborough Park. Now that Minnesota Drive is completed, there should be a developer interested in building an office complex on that property. It has easy access from France Avenue and 494 and it is visible to the freeway traffic. Sincerely, All d4e� Theresa M. McCormick 7635 Edinborough Way #5302 Edina, Minnesota 55435 (612) 835 -3994 October 7, 1989 Edina Planning Department Edina, MN 55424 To; Planning Commission and City Council Please veto the hotel on lot 1, block 1. This is a residential area here. You have Edinborough buildings. You will have a shopping center west of York. Spread the building out a bit. Don't give us the' concentration of a 142 -room hotel. G. Phillips 7350 York Avenue Edina, MN 55435 wE cEn ED COT i o 1989 October 7, 1989 City Council City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Council Members: I have the following comments regarding the Hawthorn Edina, Inc. /Hyatt Development Corporation hearing on October 16, 1989 at 7 :00 P.M.: Since this development is a hotel instead of an office building as originally planned, there will be a real difference in the patrons who occupy this development. The hotel guests will be transient.and occupy the hotel during the evening hours unlike an office building. There will also be an entrance for removing rubbish facing the south side of the Fifth Phase of Edinborough Condominium Homes. Consequently, I have the following recommendations: 1. Sufficient security provided by the Hawthorn Edina Hotel to protect both its guests and the residents of Edinborough from unwanted intrusions. 2. Adequate fencing and schrubs to cover the entrance to the utilities portion of the Hawthorn so as to provide a positive view from Edinborough. 3. Priority of Edinborough Residents,: both in the High Rise Apartments and Condominiums, over guests at the Hawthorn Edina in the use of recreational facilities at Edinborough Park. If these recommendations are followed, I believe my major concerns about this development will be addressed. I am concerned that the environment and property values of Edinborough are protected in any development on this property. Thank you. ' S' cerel,, n B ie an Jim Pro -. 1 Edinborough Way # 5111 Edina, Minnesota 55435 921 - 0419 RECEIVED 0 C 10 1989 M E M 0 DATE: October 6, 1989 at 3:00 P.M. TO: Planning Department FROM: Leonard Neuman, 7605 Edinborough Way SUBJECT: Hawthorn Suites Mr. Neuman residing at the above listed address telephoned the Planning Department to adivse that he will be unable to attend the scheduled Council Meeting of October 16, 1989. At the October 16, 1989, meeting the Council will hear a proposal on a proposed 142 unit hotel suite complex proposed by Hawthorn Suites. Mr. Neuman wanted the Council to note that he approv(s of the proposed development. x 3 A T. -.- .-. - -1 1 %T MLbD1MLOP.4LVM,.", :OJECT DATA: SHEET INDEX: H T l-U-11TE-B TE L EDINBOROUGHS. PARK EDINA, MINNESOTA CLIENT! STRUCTURAL: CIVIL .1 LANDSCAP!NG: HAWTHORN SUITES ASSOCIATES WN1. HANUSCHAK & AS50CIATE5- 'BRW, INC ARCHITECT: %IECH./ELEC.: . INTERIOR DESIGN: WINSOR/FARICY ARCHFrECTS, INC. NELSON-RUDIE..& ASSOCIATES, INC. INDEX, THE DESIGN FIRNI �1'1 Ll4tlll 4 �11 I I ii; zi %n�-: 1 .1 HAWTHORN SUITES HOTEL E[XNBOROL:CH ?ARK ED!NA. MN. TITLE SHEET DEnc. ULVELJ�'- A0. 1 2 r F- M. r r El 7r7 717 �1'1 Ll4tlll 4 �11 I I ii; zi %n�-: 1 .1 HAWTHORN SUITES HOTEL E[XNBOROL:CH ?ARK ED!NA. MN. TITLE SHEET DEnc. ULVELJ�'- A0. 1 15 March 1989 PROJECT DATA HAWTHORN SUITES EDINBOROUGH PARK . EDINA, MN W/F Project No. 8807 -8801 Site Area: 155,900 S.F. (3.58 Acres) Building Area, 1st Floor: 15,546 S.F. Park ing /Roadway (Excludes Tramway): 76,324 S.F. Open Space: 64,030 S.F. Building Type: Residence Suite Hotel B C -HC R -1 Occupancy E Building Area 90,286 S.F. Floor 1 Building Height: Number of Stories: 7 0 2 Overall Height (top of parapet): 64' -11" 1 Height at Setback: 28' -11" Floor 2 Number of Units: 142 (7 HC) 1 Unit Types 2 0 Unit A 1 Bedroom Suite 443.6 S.F. Unit B 1 Bedroom Suite 465.6 S.F. Unit C -HC Efficiency 407.6 S.F. Unit D 1 Bedroom Suite 508.8 S.F. Unit E 1 Bedroom Suite 577.9 S.F. Unit F -HC 1 Bedroom Suite 443.6 S.F. Unit Breakdown 1 1 Type A B C -HC D E F -HC Total Floor 1 9 0 0 2 1 1 13 Floor 2 15 1 1 4 2 0 23 Floor 3 15 1 1 4 2 0 23 Floor 4 15 1 1 4 1 0 22 Floor 5 13 1 1 4 2 0 21 Floor 6 13 1 1 4 1 0 20 Floor 7 13 1 1 4 1 0 20 Total: 93 6 Building Efficiency: 636 S.F. /Unit Park ing: 6 26 10 1 142 Car Stalls Required: 157 Total 1 Per Unit: 142 1 Per Employee: 15 157 Car Stalls Provided: 166 (7 HC) L LLS Z < LU gAjE0-jPYl0N SIGN ISIcm TyrE S1.4 T ELEYADO HAWTHORN SUITES HOTEL 11 ON T-Y V E EDNBORC�ARK MINAMN SITE PLAWi MAILS — - SITE PLAN DESIGN DEVELOPMENT (J�Q�CHEK �EVATI�QN All j 0 ce 0 SIGN Z tL LLJ HAWTHORN MINN. 11AWIM ORN DRIVE SUITES 0 T I L LU gAjE0-jPYl0N SIGN ISIcm TyrE S1.4 T ELEYADO HAWTHORN SUITES HOTEL 11 ON T-Y V E EDNBORC�ARK MINAMN SITE PLAWi MAILS — - SITE PLAN DESIGN DEVELOPMENT (J�Q�CHEK �EVATI�QN All j 0 SIGN SIGN TYPE S11-2 HAWTHORN 11AWIM ORN SUITES 0 T I L I!::�YMINATEQ PYLON SIGN LU gAjE0-jPYl0N SIGN ISIcm TyrE S1.4 T ELEYADO HAWTHORN SUITES HOTEL 11 ON T-Y V E EDNBORC�ARK MINAMN SITE PLAWi MAILS — - SITE PLAN DESIGN DEVELOPMENT (J�Q�CHEK �EVATI�QN All j • 1 I � _ �� �. -..rte u t .0 z EDINjI0ROUGt1'. IY1Y PER Cb S1RUCTM PL.RS •S -BURT I PLR CIM Or fON.Li'ifW y0CA fOR L - I io�o1P -b - _. - - _ ... � � _ .0 a "• a [ •7"TC 4 - LS rS CIF i I I III E 8D 1 11 -LL1N• m p ' ,'' f ' `�• - ' I I III i -� _ �� vt \ I ' — II it a A. iIII II III \ \ L I • I` FWWTHCHN SLUM HOTEL EM80RO 1[7/ PAR( o� mar e ! cuR� \\ \ Przo .RU. ,a r[ r. i [KRq ([NS PRELIMINARY L., GRADING PLAN " ccf fa.aor+er[ra.fr N It C1.2 r. 0 of LU z TJ U 10 rLFL=r===i zm FDOTCAMUE LEVELS [z4ct, I.ores G) 9 , ME a co) I � A0 1. HAWTHORN .SUTTES HOTEL EDINSOROUGH PARK EXTERIOR LICHTINC PLAN DESIGN DIVUOPMENT E1.1 1 TOWER PLAN LEVELS TWO AND THREE o :+ a le a ,N y. I:I1I- I HAWTHORN SUITES HOTEL EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINA, MN. SECOND & THIRD LEVEL PLAN DISICN Of VfIOPmENY A2.2 r -E, dim HAWTHORN SUITES HOTEL EDINBOROUCH PARK EDNA, NW ROOF PLAN D(SICN DEVELOPWNI ..2.6. !J 11,'•1 �, : /I,f �y '�aoww:ar... 'i HAWTHORN SUITES HOTEL EDINBOROUCH PARK EDNA, NW ROOF PLAN D(SICN DEVELOPWNI ..2.6. awu SOUTH ELEVATION WO LEL-111-kil II-W I F1 THE IN 1tJ1 11 H4 IN- [ginul w Ig in NORTH ELEVATION a. gWTHORN RTES HQTEL., NBOROLiCH PARk NA, MN TAIL 1DYqC ELEV 3UILDING SE= ICN-ULt(IGPMINI I .A3'1. J, 0111114 IA- ED ID 113 1$ Hil 911H -Lq Pi 1fl Ri 1-131310161 [d N 111 .ID [P In MIA m rf A MIq 41 B 4B 4. amt,- IM] i f, 111 --T -r 1p w IN 11111115 -7 rp 1, MID JU CU if II➢ r 1V v WEST EUVATION ,?CROSS SECTION, /WN'EAST ELEVATION WO LEL-111-kil II-W I F1 THE IN 1tJ1 11 H4 IN- [ginul w Ig in NORTH ELEVATION a. gWTHORN RTES HQTEL., NBOROLiCH PARk NA, MN TAIL 1DYqC ELEV 3UILDING SE= ICN-ULt(IGPMINI I .A3'1. IA- ED ID 113 1$ Hil 911H -Lq Pi 1fl Ri 1-131310161 [d N 111 .ID [P In MIA m rf WO LEL-111-kil II-W I F1 THE IN 1tJ1 11 H4 IN- [ginul w Ig in NORTH ELEVATION a. gWTHORN RTES HQTEL., NBOROLiCH PARk NA, MN TAIL 1DYqC ELEV 3UILDING SE= ICN-ULt(IGPMINI I .A3'1. ------------- e iuAIV ----------- lihmn=1 - NIT D' �Nxr,Fl - E) U E T J, ua Wil V, E) UNIT C UNIT B e. HAWTHORN. SUITES HOTEL EDINDOROUdH PAik' EDINA, MN. IT PLANS :CN DEVELOPMEHF A4.1 .0 60 pj to / vl EDINBOROUGH WAY. o PER C"dS7PUCtlC*4 PL• S •S-BUILT i PER CITY Or tDIN• F'ELD IOC•TCR 1. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1. To It or D--a 1.sF.—!J—pfw— )- P- RE / / Ali If i�7 cPl �.. —0 0- -iAwniom §jTm HOTEL Mmaqo" PAP{ MR&W PRELIMINARY WE & LmLrry PLAN PLAM� MINUTES OF THE JOINT MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY /CITY COUNCIL HELD AT EDINA CITY HALL MAY 1, 1989 A joint meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the City Council was convened to consider concurrently: Edinborough - Hawthorn Hotel Development and Edinborough - Housing Revenue Bonds. Action was taken by the HRA and the Council as required and as recorded. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners /Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Richards. MINUTES of the HRA Meeting of April 3, 1989 were approved as submitted by motion of Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Paulus. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING ON AMENDMENTS TO FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, ZONING ORDINANCE AND REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, EDINBOROUGH CONTINUED TO 5/15/89 Executive Director Gordon Hughes recalled that on April 17, 1989 the HRA and Council reviewed the development proposal of Hawthorn Suites for the vacant parcel at Edinborough. The public hearing on amendments to the Final Development Plan, Zoning Ordinance and Redevelopment Agreement for Edinborough was continued with the request that the following items be addressed or clarified. 1. Project signage, 2. Zoning Ordinance amendment relative to permitted hotels, 3. Public parking rights on the hotel site, 4. Provisions to insure that the hotel will be built and fees will be paid when due, and 5. Service of beer, wine and liquor at the hotel. Signage - A sign ordinance amendment will be prepared which will address commercial signage in the MDD -5 and 14DD -6 districts and will control signage for Edinborough and Centennial Lakes. The same standards will be proposed that are now used in the PC -3 Commercial District. The proposed signage for the hotel would conform to the PC -3 signage standards. In addition, signage in a mixed use development should have a common theme. Zoning Ordinance Amendment - Hotels are currently an allowed use in the PC -2 and PC -3 zoning districts. The proposed amendment would allow only "suites hotels" in the MDD -5 district and would be defined as a hotel in which at least 80% of the rooms are two -room suites 400 square feet or greater in size. Parking - The revised parking plan for Hawthorn Suites provides 186 surface spaces. Eighty -six of the spaces are proposed to be reserved for hotel guests, and 100 spaces would be shared with the park on a non - exclusive basis. The reserved spaces. could be signed at the entrance. to the lot rather than by individual signs at each parking space. Hawthorn would construct and maintain all of the spaces. For future parking, Hawthorn would agree to a reservation in favor of the City to construct a one -level parking deck on the hotel site, provided that the lower level is enclosed and Hawthorn approves of architectural design. Hawthorn also requests assurances that ramp construction will not impact hotel operations. In consideration of the increased parking lot size and public use, the HRA would assume responsibility for the construction of the tramway /service drive area located partially on City park property and partially on hotel property as well as the public sidewalk, extending from Edinborough Way on the south and west to the westerly entrance to Edinborough Park. H.R.A. /Council May 1, 1989 Page 2 Service of Beer. Wine and Liquor - John Lyons, Senior Project Director for Hawthorn Suites, read the following statement with regard to liquor: "Hawthorn understands and will comply with the existing liquor laws and ordinances with the City of Edina. Further, it accepts the opinion of the counsel to the City that complimentary beer, wine, or liquor cannot be served to hotel guests or others as an enticement, and specifically, beer, wine and liquor will not be served to guests during the hors d'oeuvre hour. This commitment is based on the understanding.that if the laws, ordinances or opinions of the City change in the future, or if the City otherwise permits or suffers the service of beer, wine or liquor to hotel guests by other hotels in the City, Hawthorn will be entitled to change their operations subject to compliance with the then existing laws." Chairman/Mayor Richards called for comment from the public on the proposed project. Susan Britzius, resident of Edinborough, stated that she objected to the proposed hotel. Further, she said she was concerned about enticements that may be made by the hotel that would capitalize on the park and encourage a different type of weekend guest than the business traveler. Mike Perpich, resident and Edinborough Board member, made reference to a letter from Bob C. Tift, also resident and Edinborough Board member. The letter stated that in Mr. Tift's opinion, even though some opposition has been made, a large majority of the residents are unopposed to the hotel development. Mr. Perpich said that the Board has been contacted by very few residents who are opposed. He said that he, personally, supported the proposed project. Tom Niederer, resident of Edinborough, said that he felt the residents were uninformed about the proposed project. He objected to having a hotel in his r backyard and questioned whether the community would want to associate the transients of the hotel with Edinborough park. He voiced concerns about overcrowding, safety, upkeep, treatment of the facility by transients, and possible future sale of the hotel to a new owner. Chairman /Mayor Richards questioned Mr. Lyons further on the issue of serving of liquor and his understanding of the City's ordinance regulating liquor. Mr. Lyons said that after the meeting of April 17th he had referred this issue to Hawthorn's counsel and had him clearly identify the liquor law process. This information will be part of the orientation for the hotel's manager. Chairman /Mayor Richards said he would not vote for the proposed project until he heard from a representative of Hyatt that they understood the liquor laws in Edina and do not intend to offer free liquor at any time while they own this property, if the Hawthorn Suites project is approved. Mr. Lyons responded that if the statement of counsel were put into his own words that, basically, counsel said the City's Attorney has given his opinion, that they do not differ with the opinion and therefore are in concurrence with it. Commissioner /Member Smith asked Attorney Erickson to restate his opinion concerning liquor. Attorney Erickson stated that under the City's ordinance beer and wine licenses are reserved for specific places, e.g, restaurants with minimum seating for 25 persons, where meals are regularly served to the public. If Hawthorn would establish that kind of restaurant they would, under the ordinance, be one of those places entitled to serve beer and wine. Commissioner /Member Smith asked if it was the intent of Hawthorn Suites to have a restaurant that would fit those qualifications. Mr. Lyons stated that the restaurant in Hawthorn Suites is ( not designed for the 'outside public, it is designed for internal use only. Commissioner /Member Kelly asked for a clarification on the proposed room rent for the hotel suites. Steve Goldman, representing Hawthorn Suites, explained the room rate structure in some detail and also discounts that may apply. They anticipate H.R.A. /Council May 1, 1989 Page 3 that the rates will average approximately $70 -75. Commissioner /Member Kelly commented that she would be more comfortable with the higher rates that were mentioned at the previous meeting. Commissioner/Member Rice said that he concurred with Chairman/Mayor Richards that the liquor issue need to be cleared up before further consideration can be given to the project. Commissioner/Member Smith raised the question of the land use and said he was concerned that the residents at Edinborough purchased their units based upon the amenity of the indoor park and two office buildings on the site. Chairman /Mayor Richards recalled that the Council had indicated on April 17 that there was no problem with the land use and that it was appropriate. Commissioner/Member Paulus commented that it is impossible to hear every Edinborough resident and that what is important is what is best for the City, of which Edinborough is a part. She said she was in favor of the proposed project; that this is land that will not be used for office and that here is a proposal for use of the land. She stated further that the proposed zoning ordinance amendment would be written to allow only "suites hotels" which would protect the City if the property were sold in the future. Regarding the liquor issue, she concurred that the Council needs to hear a clear statement that Hawthorn will not serve liquor. Steve Goldman answered by stating that Hawthorn Suites would not serve liquor under the conditions as they exist today. Attorney Erickson advised that, in order to bind the corporation to that statement, it could be included in the closing documents, by a separate letter or as part of the document itself. Commissioner /Member Smith said that he did not understand why Hawthorn Suites was asking the. City to enclose the hotel parking if in the future the City determined it was necessary to construct a one level ramp. Mr. Lyons said their understanding of the original project dealt with their buying land from the City and developing the hotel. Shortly after the process was begun, staff advised that the City desired to create some additional parking on the site for non -hotel use. Subsequently, that has grown to the current proposal of 86 spaces for hotel use and 100 spaces for general use. The value of the land and the paving that would go into making up those 100 spaces would probably equate to $350,000. Subsequent to that, they were asked by the City for air rights to develop a parking deck over the land they would own. Typically, air rights have some value. Hawthorn then suggested: 1) they would concede the value of the public parking and 2) would make the air rights available for free. The only thing they would ask would be that in developing the ramp that they end up with enclosed parking spaces for the lower level. Chairman/Mayor Richards commented that an enclosed ramp would be prohibitively expensive. That requirement would amount to saying they never wanted the ramp in the first place - it would appear that there is a giving and a taking involved. Mr. Lyons said his opinion was that enclosed ramps are not prohibitively expensive; that they are marginally more expensive. Chairman /Mayor Richards said the real question is the business decision as to why the hotel would insist that it has to be an enclosed ramp. Mr. Goldman elaborated that Hawthorn would be giving the City the value of the land /air rights. In exchange Hawthorn would receive some value in having enclosed parking which would make the hotel more competitive. Commissioner /Member Rice said that he did not feel there would ever be a public parking problem, but that if it would come down to the question of enclosed parking in order to add a ramp, he would vote no. Commissioner /Member Rice expressed his views on the issues raised at the April 17 meeting: Signage - Hawthorn has responded well and he saw no problem with the signage as proposed. Liquor - Assuming that Hawthorn had clarified that question H.R.A. /Council May 1, 1989 j Page 4 and would serve no liquor, he had no problem with that. Zoning amendment - Comfortable with the definition of the suites hotel as defined by staff. Parking - Revised parking lot plan is okay provided that Hawthorn's approval of architectural design for the one -level parking deck is not unreasonable withheld. Would object to provision that the City enclose the lower level. Public safety for Edinborough residents - Has concluded that Edinborough is a regional facility now; that the proposed hotel use may be a less desirable use than office but that it is not an unacceptable risk. Hawthorn Suites can be an asset to Edinborough and the community. With regard to the agreement document, Commissioner /Member Rice suggested that an option to purchase replace the reverter provision. Commissioner/Member Paulus asked if Hawthorn would consider withdrawing the provision that the lower level of the parking be enclosed if the ramp is constructed. Further discussion was held on the parking lot and one level ramp, and also the signage. Chairman /Mayor Richards then asked for Hawthorn's position on the enclosed hotel parking. Mr. Goldman said he believed they would be willing to eliminate the enclosed parking if assurances would be given that there would be no business interruption to the hotel during time of construction of the ramp. Commissioner/Member Kelly said that although she believed in the concept of a suites hotel and felt that it would be an asset to the community, she said she was not prepared to act on the proposal. Chairman /Mayor Richards asked if staff had enough information to refine the documents to reflect the comments made by the Council Members and to bring back a definitive proposal to be acted upon at the next meeting. Director Hughes responded that staff could return with a final draft of the redevelopment contract, that would include specific contingencies regarding the parking ramp (to C not include the provision that the lower level be enclosed). Further, that a statement regarding liquor be included as part of the closing documents in the form of a letter from an officer of the company, as suggested by the City Attorney. Following further discussion on whether the HRA /Council was prepared to take action on the proposed project, Commissioner/Member Kelly made a motion that the public hearing on the Hawthorn Hotel Development be continued to May 15, 1989. Motion was seconded by Commissioner /Member Rice. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED ON ISSUANCE OF REFUNDING BONDS FOR PARR PLAZA PROJECT EDINBOROUGH: RESOLUTION ADOPTED AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE AND SALE OF BONDS: RESOLUTION ADOPTED APPROVING REFINANCING AND AMENDMENT TO INTEREST REDUCTION AGREEMENT Affidavits of notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Chairman /Mayor Richards declared that the public hearing was open and asked for public comment on the proposed refunding of bonds issued for the Edina Park Plaza elderly housing project at Edinborough. No comment or objection being heard, Chairman /Mayor Richards then called for comment from Henry Hyatt, Executive Vice President, Edina Park Plaza of Edinborough. Mr. Hyatt said he had nothing to add from his previous presentation. Chairman /Mayor Richards then declared the public hearing closed. Commissioner /Member Rice asked why the developer had requested that FHA increase the principal amount of the mortgage loan-which it will insure by up to $1,100,000. Mr. Hyatt explained that if the FHA approves the increase it would go ( towards paying the cost of issuance, reducing some of the letter of credit cost or reducing the amount of non -rated bonds and establishing a mortgage operating deficit reserve. H.R.A. /Council • May 1, 1989 • Page 5 Commissioner/Member Rice then asked why this would be of benefit for the City. Mr. Hyatt said that the overall interest rate would be substantially reduced even with the increased debt. In addition, the City would have assurance, with the anticipated $500,000 of operating deficit reserve, that the project is that more secure. Chairman /Mayor Richards asked for assurances that no one would take any money out of the project other than for reducing debt service. Mr. Hyatt stated that they will not take any funds out if there is a mortgage increase to reimburse for previous costs of the partnership. Attorney Erickson indicated that they will be repaying themselves for some operating cost losses, but other than that there will be no funds going to the developer. Member Rice introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF HOUSING DEVELOPMENT REFUNDING REVENUE BONDS (FHA INSURED MORTGAGE IRAN - EDINA PARR PLAZA PROJECT), 1989 -A AND 1989 -B, AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City "), as follows: Section 1. Recitals and Findings. 1.1 By the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended (the "Act "), the City is authorized to plan, administer, issue and sell revenue bonds or obligations to make or purchase loans to finance one or more multifamily housing developments within its boundaries, which revenue bonds or obligations shall be payable solely from the revenues of the development. Pursuant to Section 462C.07, Subdivision 1 of the Act, in the purchase or making of multifamily housing loans and the issuance of revenue bonds or other obligations the City may exercise within its corporate limits any of the powers the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency may exercise under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462A, without limitation under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. 1.2 The City has heretofore developed and, after due notice and public hearing, has adopted a housing plan (the "Plan ") on April 19, 1982 under the Act. The Plan sets forth, among other things, the housing needs of the City and methods for meeting such needs. The Plan has been reviewed and commented on by the Metropolitan Council pursuant to Section 462C.01, paragraph (c) of the Act. 1.3. The Act provides that the City may plan, administer and make or purchase a loan or loans to finance one or more developments of the kinds described in Subdivisions 2, 3, 4 and 7 of Section 462C.05 of the Act, upon adoption of a program setting forth the information required by Subdivision 6 of Section 462C.05 of the Act, after a public hearing thereon, and upon approval by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (the "Agency "), as provided by Section 462C.01 of the Act, on the basis of the considerations stated in Section 462C.04 of the Act. 1.4. This Council has heretofore received a proposal that the City finance the cost of a multifamily housing development under the Act, consisting of acquisition of land located at 7800 York Avenue in the City and the construction and equipping thereon of a residential rental facility containing approximately 203 housing. units and including functionally related and subordinate facilities (the "Development "). 1.5. The City has heretofore caused to be prepared and, after due notice, public hearing and submission for review and comment, has adopted a program (the' "Original Program ") under the Act relating to the Development. The Original Program, as adopted on June 17, 1985, has been submitted to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency in accordance with Section 462C.05 of the Act for approval as provided in Section 462C.01 -on the basis of considerations stated in Section 462C.04 of the Act, and is deemed approved under the provisions of said Section 462C.04, Subdivision I. H,R.A. /Council May 1, 1989. Page 6 1.6. Pursuant to the Original Program, the City has heretofore issued and C sold its Housing Development Revenue Bonds (FHA Insured Mortgage Loan - Edina Park Plaza Project), Series 1985 (the "Prior Bonds "), and has used the net proceeds of the Prior Bonds to make a mortgage loan (the "Mortgage Loan ") to Edina Park Plaza Associates Limited Partnership, an Illinois limited partnership (the "Developer ") and a supplemental loan to Partners for Senior Communities, Inc., an Illinois corporation and a general partner of the Developer (the "General Partner "), to finance the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Development. The Mortgage Loan has been endorsed for mortgage loan insurance by the Federal Housing Administration of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. 1.7. In connection with the issuance of the Prior Bonds and the financing of the Development, the Developer has heretofore entered into an Elderly Housing Interest Reduction Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1985 (the "Interest Reduction Agreement "), with the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "Authority "). The obligations of the Developer under the Interest Reduction Agreement are secured by a Combination Mortgage, Security Agreement, Assignment of Rents and Fixture Financing Statement, dated as of October 1, 1985 (the "Authority Mortgage "), from the Developer to the Authority. 1.8. Pursuant to covenants and restrictions entered into in connection with the Prior Bonds, the Development is required to be occupied for a specified period of time primarily by elderly persons and in part (at least 20 %) by persons and families of low and moderate income. 1.9. The construction and equipping of the Development have been completed, and the Development has been partially leased. Initial leasing projections have not been met, however,,and the Developer and the General Partner are in default under the loan documents securing the Prior Bonds. .1.10. This Council has received a proposal from the Developer that the City refinance the cost of the Development by issuing its refunding revenue bonds in C one or more series (the "Bonds "), for the purpose of refunding and redeeming the outstanding prior Bonds, in connection with a proposed amendment and assignment of the Mortgage Loan. 1.11. The City has heretofore caused to be prepared and has approved an amended program (the "Amended Program ") under the Act, pursuant to which it is proposed that the City issue the Bonds in one or more series and in a maximum aggregate principal amount of $17,500,000 to refund and redeem the Prior Bonds in connection with the proposed amendment and assignment of the Mortgage Loan and the refinancing of the Development. 1.12. The City has been advised by the Developer that conventional commercial financing is available to refinance capital costs of the Development only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the scope of the Development and the economic feasibility of operating the Development would be significantly affected, but with.the aid of municipal financing the operation of the Development can be made more economically feasible. 1.13. The City has been advised by representatives of the Developer and Dain Bosworth Incorporated, of Minneapolis, Minnesota (the "Underwriter "), that on the basis of information available to them and their discussions with the Developer and potential purchasers of bonds, the Bonds could be sold at favorable rates and terms to refund and redeem the Prior Bonds and refinance the Development. 1.14. The full faith and credit of the City will not be pledged to or responsible for the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds. 1.15. The City has received drafts of a Trust Indenture, a Financing Agreement and an Escrow Agreement (collectively, the "City Financing Documents "), a draft Bond Purchase Agreement (the "Bond Purchase Agreement "), and a draft Preliminary Official Statement (the "Preliminary Official Statement ") in connection with the proposed issuance and sale of the Bonds, and has caused such documents to be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. 1.16. Pursuant to notice duly published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City not less than 15 days prior to the date fixed therefor, this Council has held a public hearing on May 1, 1989, at which all interested H.R.A. /Council May 1, 1989 Page 7 persons were afforded an opportunity to express their views, in person or in writing, on the proposed issuance of the Bonds. This Council has carefully considered the views submitted at the public hearing. 1.17. It is hereby found, determined and declared as follows: (a) The Development will constitute a multifamily housing development under Section 462C.01, Subdivision 5 of the Act. The City is authorized to develop and finance the Amended Program by the authorization, issuance and sale of refunding revenue bonds or obligations payable solely from the revenues of the Amended Program and the Development. The purpose of the Development is and its effect will be to promote the public welfare and preserve the quality of life in the City by helping to maintain, provide and preserve adequate housing stock within the-City and to assist persons of low and moderate income, or elderly persons, or both, to obtain decent, safe and sanitary housing within the City. (b) Based upon representations by the Developer and the General Partner, financing for the Development is not otherwise available to the Developer from private lenders upon terms and conditions which are affordable by the Developer, such financing being available only at a rate which, when combined with the cost of operating the Development as well as noneconomic factors, would impair the feasibility of the Development; the General Partner expects that the revenues to be produced by the rental of units in the Development will be sufficient to meet payments when due on the Mortgage Loan, as amended. 1.18. The findings and approvals contained in Section 1 and 2 of the resolution adopted by this Council on April 17, 1989 with respect to the Development, the Amended Program and the Bonds, to the extent not inconsistent with the provisions of this resolution, are hereby confirmed. Section 2. Approval and Authorization. 2.1. This Council, being the "applicable elected representative" of the City within the meaning of Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as -amended, hereby approves and authorizes the issuance of the Bonds upon the terms and 'conditions hereinafter set forth. 2.2 It is hereby determined that it is desirable for the City to proceed with the issuance of the Bonds in one or more series, in fully registered form, without coupons, in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $17,500,000, bearing interest at a rate per annum not to exceed 9.00% (except that the Subordinate Bonds, as defined hereinafter, may bear interest at a rate per annum not to exceed 12.00$), maturing not later than December 1, 2030, and bearing the further terms and conditions set forth in the Trust Indenture heretofore filed with the City (as the same may be amended or completed, as hereinafter provided); provided, that if the Bonds are to be issued in more than one series, the aggregate principal amount of Bonds,, if any, which are not secured by the Mortgage Loan, as amended (the "Subordinate Bonds "), shall not. exceed $1,600,000. Subject to the limitations set forth in this Section 2.2, authority is hereby delegated to the Mayor and the City Manager of the City, acting jointly, to determine the aggregate principal amount of Bonds of each series to be issued, the maturities thereof and the rate or rates of interest payable thereon. 2.3. The form of the Bond Purchase Agreement heretofore filed with the City is hereby approved, subject to such changes as may be deemed desirable by the Mayor, the City Manager and the City Attorney. The Mayor and the City Manager of the City are hereby authorized and directed, on behalf of the City, to execute and deliver a bond purchase agreement in substantially the form of the Bond Purchase Agreement heretofore filed with the City, together with such changes and completions thereof as may be approved by the Mayor, the City Manager and the City Attorney, subject to the limitations contained in this resolution, the execution thereof to constitute conclusive evidence of the approval of such changes and completions. 2.4. Authority is hereby delegated to the Mayor and the City Manager of the City, acting jointly, to determine the aggregate purchase price of the Bonds, provided that the aggregate compensation to the Underwriter (whether in the form H.R.A. /Council May 1, 1989 Page 8 of a discount, fees or other compensation) shall not exceed an amount equal to 3.00% of the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds. 2.5. The forms of the City Financing Documents heretofore filed with the City are hereby approved. The Mayor and the City Manager of the City are hereby authorized and directed, on behalf of the City, to execute and deliver the City Financing Documents in substantially the forms herebby approved, but including such modifications, insertions and additions as are necessary and appropriate in their opinion and in the opinion of the City Attorney and consistent with the Act. The execution of the City Financing Documents by the appropriate officers of the City shall be conclusive evidence of the approval thereof by the City. 2.6. The distribution of a preliminary official statement with respect to one or more series of the Bonds to prospective purchasers, in substantially the form of the Preliminary Official Statement heretofore filed with the City and with such changes, insertions,'omissions and revisions as the Mayor, City Manager and City Attorney shall deem advisable, and the use thereof by the Underwriter in connection with the offering of such Bonds, are hereby authorized and approved. The Mayor is authorized to permit the distribution of the final official statement in substantially the form of the Preliminary Official Statement, with such changes, omissions, insertions and revisions as the Mayor, the City Manager and the City Attorney shall deem advisable. 2.7. The Mayor and the City Manager of the City are authorized and directed to prepare and execute the Bonds and to deliver them to the trustee pursuant to the Trust Indenture for authentication and delivery to the purchasers thereof, together with a certified copy of this resolution and other documents required by the Trust Indenture. As provided in the Trust Indenture, the Bonds shall be executed by the manual or facsimile signatures of the Mayor and City Manager and impressed with the seal of the City or a facsimile thereof and shall be authenticated by the trustee, as authenticating agent, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.55, Subdivision 1. C2.8. As provided in the Trust Indenture, the Bonds are special, limited obligations of the City. Principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds are payable solely out of the revenues derived from the sources described in the granting clauses of the Trust Indenture. Neither the State of Minnesota nor the County of Hennepin shall in any event be liable for the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds or for the performance of any pledge, mortgage, obligation or agreement of any kind whatsoever that may be undertaken by the City. Neither the Bonds nor any of the agreements or obligations of the City contained in the City Financing Documents shall be construed to constitute an indebtedness of the State of Minnesota, the County of Hennepin or the City, within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory provisions whatsoever, nor to constitute or give rise to a pecuniary liability or be a charge against the general credit or taxing power of the State of Minnesota, the County of Hennepin or the City. 2.9. The Mayor, the City Manger and the City Clerk of the City are authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to bond counsel and the Underwriter certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City relating to the Bonds, and such other affidavits and certificates as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality of the Bonds as such facts appear from the books and records in the officers' custody and control or as otherwise known to them; and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall constitute representations of the City as to the truth of all statements contained therein. 2.10. The Mayor and the City Manager of the City are hereby authorized to execute such additional agreements, documents and certificates in connection with the Bonds as may be necessary and appropriate in their opinion and in the opinion of the City Attorney and consistent with the Act. Copies of such additional agreements, documents and certificates, when executed, shall be delivered, filed and recorded as provided therein. 2.11. To evidence the exercise of the authority delegated to the Mayor and City Manager of the City by this resolution, the Mayor and City Manager are hereby H.R.A. /Council May 1, 1989 Page 9 directed to execute and file with the trustee named in the Trust Indenture a r certificate setting forth the determinations made by them pursuant to the authority granted in this resolution, which certificate shall constitute conclusive evidence of the proper exercise by them of such authority. 2.12. The approvals hereby given to the various documents referred to above includes approval of such additional details therein as may be necessary and appropriate and such modifications thereof, deletions therefrom and additions thereto as may be approved by the City Attorney and by the Mayor and the City Manager authorized herein to execute said documents prior to their execution; and the Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized to approve said changes on behalf of the City. The execution of any instrument by the appropriate officer or officers of the City herein authorized shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents in accordance with the terms hereof. In the absence of the Mayor or the City Manager, the documents authorized by this resolution to be executed may be executed by the Acting Mayor or the Assistant City Manager. 2.13. Notwithstanding the approvals and authorizations contained in Section 2 of this resolution, however, the City retains the right to withdraw from participation and accordingly not to issue the Bonds if (i) the Developer or any partner of the Developer fails to provide indemnification to the City, in form and substance satisfactory to the City, in connection with the issuance and sale of the Bonds and.the refunding and redemption of the Prior Bonds, or (ii) the Developer fails to provide a mortgagee's policy of title insurance with respect to the Authority Mortgage in form and substance satisfactory to the Authority. 2.14. The approvals hereby given to the various documents referred to above supersede the provisions of Section 2.6 of the resolution heretofore adopted by this Council on April 17, 1989 relating to the Development and the Bonds. Adopted this 1st day of May, 1989. �. ATTEST: S Mayor ° .. City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member Paulus and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards and the following voted against the same: None whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Commissioner Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE EDINA PARK PLAZA PROJECT; APPROVING THE REFINANCING THEREOF AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the Authority) as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. Pursuant to a Trust Indenture, dated as of October 1, 1985, between the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City ") and First Bank National Association (formerly known as First National Bank of Minneapolis), as trustee (the "Prior Bonds Trustee "), the City has heretofore issued and sold its Housing Development Revenue Bonds (FHA Insured Mortgage Loan - Edina Park Plaza Project), Series 1985 (the "Prior Bonds "), in the original aggregate principal amount of $17,622,800. The Prior Bonds are presently outstanding in the aggregate principal, amount of approximately $17,345,000. 1.02. Proceeds of the Prior Bonds were used to fund a mortgage loan (the "Mortgage Loan ") to Edina Park Plaza Associates Limited Partnership, an Illinois limited partnership (the "Developer ") and a supplemental loan to Partners for Senior Communities, Inc., an Illinois corporation and a general partner of the Developer (the "General Partner "), for the purpose of acquiring, constructing and H.R.A. /Council ` May 1, 1989 Page 10 equipping an approximately 203 -unit multifamily housing development and functionally related and subordinate facilities located at 7800 York Avenue in the City (the "Development "). 1.03. The Mortgage Loan, which is evidenced by a mortgage note secured by a first mortgage lien on the Development under a Mortgage, dated as of October 1, 1985 (the "FHA Mortgage ") from the Developer to the Prior Bonds Trustee, has been endorsed for mortgage loan insurance by the Federal Housing Administration of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the Mortgage Loan is presently outstanding in the principal amount of approximately $14,600,000. 1.04. In connection with the financing of the Development, the Authority has heretofore executed and delivered the following documents: . (a) the Deed and Covenants Running With the Land, dated as of October 1, 1985 (the "Deed "), from the Authority to the Developer; (b) the Elderly Housing Interest Reduction Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1985 (the "Interest Reduction Agreement "), between the Authority and the Developer; (c) the Escrow Agreement, dated as of October 22, 1985 (the "Escrow Agreement "), between the City, the Authority, the Prior Bonds Trustee, Title Services, Inc, and the Developer; and (d) the Combination Mortgage, Security Agreement, Assignment of Rents and Fixture Financing Statement, dated as of October 1, 1985 (the "Authority Mortgage "), from the Developer to the Authority. The Deed, the Interest Reduction Agreement, the Escrow Agreement and the Authority Mortgage are herein referred to collectively as the "Authority Documents ". 1.05. Under the Interest Reduction Agreement, the Authority has agreed to use tax increment derived from the tax increment financing district established by the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan and investment income thereon to lend certain amounts (the "Interest Advances ") to the Developer from time to time to C pay interest on the Mortgage Loan. Under Section 1(b) of the Interest Reduction Agreement, the obligation of the Authority to make Interest Advances terminates upon an "Event of Termination," as defined therein, including a refunding or defeasance of the Prior Bonds initiated by the Developer. Upon an Event of Termination, Section 4 of the Interest Reduction Agreement requires the Developer to repay certain amounts to the Authority. The obligations of the Developer under the Interest Reduction Agreement are secured by the Authority Mortgage, which is subordinate and junior to the FHA Mortgage. 1.06. The construction and equipping of the Development has been completed, and the Development has been partially leased. Initial leasing projections, have not been met, however, and the Developer and the General Partner are in default under the loan documents securing the Prior Bonds. 1.07. The Developer has requested that the City issue its Housing Development Refunding Revenue Bonds (FHA Insured Mortgage Loan - Edina Park Plaza Project) (the "Bonds "), in one or more series, to refund and redeem the outstanding Prior Bonds and refinance the Development. 1.08. In connection with the refunding of the Prior Bonds, the Developer has requested that the terms of the Mortgage Loan and the FHA Mortgage be amended and assigned to the trustee for the Bonds. The amendments to the Mortgage Loan and the FHA Mortgage may result in an increase in the principal amount of the Mortgage Loan and /or a reduction in the interest rate thereon. Such increase, if any, in the outstanding principal amount of the Mortgage Loan may be evidenced by a supplement or amendment to the Mortgage Loan and the FHA Mortgage or by a supplemental mortgage loan and related mortgage (such supplement, amendment or supplemental mortgage loan and related mortgage being referred to herein as the "Amendments "). The Developer will remain the owner of the Development following the proposed refinancing, and the Development is to remain subject to the FHA Mortgage, as amended by the Amendments, and to the covenants and restrictions (including those in the Deed) heretofore entered in connection with the Prior Bonds. 1.09. The Developer has requested that the Authority consent to the refunding of the Prior Bonds and to the Amendments. The Developer has further H.R.A. /Council May 1, 1989 Page 11 requested that the Authority consent to certain amendments to the Interest Reduction Agreement and the other Authority Documents for the purposes, among others, of ensuring that the refunding of the Prior Bonds will not give rise to an Event of Termination and that the lien of the FHA Mortgage, as amended by the Amendments, will remain prior to that of the Authority Mortgage. To this end, there have been prepared and filed with the Authority drafts of a First Amendment to Interest Reduction Agreement and a Consent and Subordination Agreement (collectively, the "Authority Amending Documents "). Section 2. Approvals. 2.01. The proposed refunding of the Prior Bonds, the proposed Amendments and assignment of the Mortgage Loan and the FHA Mortgage, and the transactions described in Section 1 of this resolution in connection with the refinancing of the Development are hereby approved, subject to the terms, conditions and limitations set forth in this resolution; provided, however, that the outstanding principal amount of the Mortgage Loan, as amended by the Amendments, shall not exceed $16,000,000. 2.02. The Authority Amending Documents are hereby approved in the form heretofore submitted to the Authority, with such additions, completions, changes and deletions as may be deemed necessary or appropriate by the officers of the Authority executing the same and subject to the approval of counsel to the Authority. 2.03. Notwithstanding the approvals contained in Section 2 of this resolution, however, the Authority retains the right to withdraw from participation and accordingly to refuse to consent to the Amendments if the Developer fails to provide a mortgagee's policy of title insurance with respect to the Authority Mortgage in form and substance satisfactory to the Authority. Section 3. Authorization. 3..01. Any two officers of the Authority are hereby authorized to execute and deliver the Authority Amending Documents in substantially the form heretofore submitted to the Authority, with such additions, completions, changes and deletions as such officers may consider necessary or appropriate, together with such additional documents, agreements and certificates as the officers executing the same may consider necessary or appropriate to effectuate the proposed refunding of the Prior Bonds and the related transactions described herein. Such documents, agreements and certificates shall be in form and content approved by the officers of the Authority executing the .same and counsel to the Authority, and the execution by such officers of the Authority of any such documents, agreements and certificates shall be conclusive evidence of their approval. Adopted this 1st day„of—Ilay, 1989. ATTEST — qW Wt* Q Stecutive ctor The motion for th�ejadoiption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner Rice and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards and the following voted against the same None whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. There being no further business Commissioner Smith was seconded Motion carried unanimously. on the joint HRA /Council agenda, motion of by Commissioner Kelly for adjournment of the URA. IInMI" L;? L/ "s City Clerk 10 Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN; RATIFYING AND AFFIRMING THE EXECUTION OF VARIOUS AGREEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF VARIOUS OTHER DOCUMENTS BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), as follows: 1. Recitals. The HRA and the Edina City Council have previously approved a redevelopment plan, as defined in- Minnesota Statutes, Section 469-002, subdivision 16, designated.as the Southeast. Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan ") -. Acting pursuant to the Plan the HRA entered into a Land Sale Agreement and Contract For Private Redevelopment (the "Contract ") with the East Edina Housing Foundation (the "Foundation ") dated on or as Hof- August 1, 1985. The Contract was subsequently - amended by Amendment No. 1 dated as of October 1, 1985, by Amendment No. 2 dated as of April 1, 1986, by Amendment No. 3 dated as of July 10, 1986, by Amendment No. 4 dated as-of October 6, 1 "986, by Amendment No. 5 dated as of February 19, 1987 and by Amendment No. 6 dated as of March 31., 1989. ( together herein called the "Prior Amendments ") . It is now proposed that the Contract be further amended by the Hotel Redevelopment Agreement dated as of May 15, 1989 (the "Current. Amendment ") and the Current Amendment has been presented to and reviewed by the HRA. 2. Ratification,. Execution and Deliver . The execution and delivery of the Contract and Prior Amendments by the officers executing the same on behalf .of the HRA is hereby ratified and affirmed. 3. Authorization for Execution and Delivery of Further Documents. The form of the Current Amendment is hereby approved subject to such modifications as are deemed appropriate and approved by the attorney for Lhe HRA and the Executive Director of the HRA, which approval shall be conclusively evidenced by the execution of the Current. Amendment by any two officers of the HRA. Any two officers of the HRA are directed to execute and deliver. the Current Amendment. Any two officers of the HRA are also authorized and directed to execute and deliver such other instruments, and take such other action, as may be required to accomplish the transactions contemplated herein and by the Current Amendment, including. but not limited to any-amendments or- supplements to the Contract, as amended, and other agreements, as may be necessary to accomplish the transactions contemplated by the Current f' Z' ;J. Amendment. The execution of any such amendments, supplements or agreements by any two officers of the HRA shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents by the HRA in accordance with this Resolution. Dated this day of 1989, Chairman Attest: Executive Director The.motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was.duly scco.nded by Commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and..the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted and was si.gncd by the Chairman and his signature attested by the Executive Director. _t CERTIFICATE I, the undersigned, being the Executive Director of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA " ), hereby certify that I am the recording officer for the HRA and that attached hereto is a true and correct copy of a resolution entitled "Resolution Relating to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan; Ratifying and Affirming the Execution of Various Agreements and Authorizing the Execution of Various Other Documents" adopted by the Board of Commissioners of the HRA at a meeting duly called and held by the Board of Commissioners on , 1989. WITNESS my hand as such recording officer this day of 1989, Executive Director Agenda Item II. (Joint HRA /Council) 7609 �' !• ` �l/a�y {1.G //R . (;;4,uz, C� C-�N X0.1 owe O IL's CS N V, 'D 0C1 1619�� A. w19 N 1U ',�. e , �. O ch �° REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Edina From: Francis Hoffman City Engineer Date: 16 October, 1989 Subject: . '50th & France Tile Paver Replacement Agenda Item # III. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: No action at this time. Info /Background: The HRA directed the staff and 50th & France Business Association to reach a con - census on what materials to use at 50th & France. Ms. Gail Korst reported that the Association's Board of Directors have taken a position that the materials to be used should be an exposed aggregate color and finish similar to what Southdale is using in its renovation. Ms. Korst and staff discussed the idea of placing a strip of exposed aggregate behind the theater for final review of the 50th & France Business Association. The proposed samples would be done and a final survey sent to everyone expressing a finding that this.type of proposed exposed aggregate finish would be used unless a preference would be for the concrete paver brick which staff had recommended earlier. This work would be done this fall and survey completed immediately so that we could start the contract documents preparation for a winter letting followed by a start of work as early as weather will allow in the spring. Staff is very aware of the strong concern that whatever is done, that it be visually appealing, durable, and as smooth a surface as possible. We believe this recommenda- tion to do final test sections is consistent with our normal practice at 50th & France to seek opinions not only of landlords but tenants. 50th & FRANCE BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION P.O. Box 24122 Edina. Minnesota 55424 Oct.13,1989 To: Gordon.Hughes & Members of the Edina City Council On behalf of the 50th & France Board of Directors we would like to express our wishes for the type of sidewalks to be put in at 50th & France. It was voted unanimously to have a product like the red exposed aggregate used at the new Southdale area. We like this product because of its durability and even walking surface, and feel it's cost effective. We voted against the brick pavers because of the past problems with bricks coming up and the problem of womens heels catch- ing in the cracks. We feel that we would have an aesthetically pleasing look with the red exposed aggregate. , Thank you for your time. 50th & France Board of Directors President Cn 0 • , ��DAPOMS�O • pass REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: CITY COUNCIL /HRA From: GORDON L. HUGHES ASSISTANT CITY.MANAGER Date: MAY 1, 1989 Subject: AMENDMENT'S TO FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, ZO ORDINANCE AND REDEVE MENT AGREEMENT Recommendation: Agenda Item # 4RA m: A,!& c Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends E To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion' It is recommended to approve amendment's to final development plan, zoning ordinance and redevelopment agreement. Info /Background: On April 17, 1989, the City Council and the HRA reviewed the development Proposal of Hawthorn Suites for the vacant parcel at Edinborough. The Council and the HRA continued the matter to the May 1, 1989, meeting and requested that the following items be addressed or clarified. I. Project signage 2. The zoning ordinance amendment relative to permitted hotels 3. Public parking rights on the hotel site 4. Provisions to insure that the hotel will be built and fees will be paid when due 5. Service of beer, wine and liquor at the hotel Attached is a memo from Craig Larsen which reviews the proposed signage for the hotel. Also included in his memo is a proposed amendment to the zoning ordinance permitting a suites hotel in the mixed - development district. The definition of the suites hotel is patterned around that proposed by Hawthorn Suites. Report and Recommendation May 1, 1989 Page Two Also attached is a letter from Thomas Erickson which outlines the requirement of the redevelopment contract as to the payment of fees and the construction of the project. We believe the existing contracts provide the necessary assurances that the project will be completed. The Council /HRA identified two issues concerning public parking on the hotel site: First, the Council had an interest in reserving rights to construct the parking deck on the property in the future, if warranted. Second, the Council requested a non - exclusive easement covering the hotel parking lot for use by park visitors. As to the first point, Hawthorn Suites has agreed to a reservation in favor of the City to construct a one -level parking deck on the hotel site, provided that the lower level is enclosed and Hawthorn approves of architectural design. Hawthorn also requests assurances that ramp construction will not impact hotel operations. As to the easement for park parking, Hawthorn has prepared a revised parking lot plan for the site, which increases the size of the parking lot from 166 spaces to 186 spaces. This parking lot has been designed such that 86 spaces would be reserved for exclusive hotel use and the remaining 100 spaces would be available on a non - exclusive basis to park users 24 hours per day. Hawthorn has agreed to construct and maintain the entire parking lot. In consideration of the increased parking lot size and public use, staff has recommended that the HRA assume responsibility of the construction of the tramway /service drive area located partially on City park property and partially on hotel property as well as the public sidewalk, extending from Edinborough Way on the south and west to the westerly entrance to Edinborough Park. We estimate the cost of these improvements at approximately $30,000. Hawthorn Suites intends to submit to the Council a letter outlining their understanding and commitments relative to the service of liquor at the hotel. This letter states, among other things, that complimentary beer, wine or liquor will not be served to hotel guests or others -as an enticement or during the hotels hors d'oeuvre hour in the afternoon. In staff's opinion, a reasonable agreement has been fashioned dealing with present parking rights, future parking, and HRA public improvements. We believe that the 100 parking stalls that will be provided for public use will adequately serve the parking demand for Edinborough Park, particularly during weekday hours. Therefore, we recommend approval of the amendment to the final development plan, the amendment to the zoning ordinance permitting limited - service hotels and an amendment to the redevelopment agreement with the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. r M E M O R A N D U M DATE: May 1, 1989 TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager FROM: Craig Larsen, City Planner SUBJECT: HAWTHORN SUITES PROPOSAL The Council, at its April 17, 1989 meeting, continued the hearing on the Hawthorn application and asked for further information on parking, signage, and specific language for an ordinance amendment. Si nage: Staff will be preparing a sign ordinance amendment which will address commercial signage in the MD -5 and MD -6 districts. This amendment would control signage for Edinborough and for Centennial Lakes. We will propose the same standards that we now use in the PC -3, commercial district. The proposed hotel signage conforms to the PC -3 signage standards. In addition to size standards, signage in a•mixed use development should have a common theme. Staff is suggesting the use of Edinborough green and bright brass accents to carry through the Edinborough theme in the hotel signage. Zoning Ordinance Amendment: Hotels are currently.an allowed use in the PC -2 and PC -3 zoning districts. The proposed amendment would allow only "suites hotels" in the MD -5 district. A suites hotel is defined as a hotel in which at least 80% of the rooms are two -room suites 400 square feet or greater in size. Parking: The third attachment to this report summarizes the parking situation at Edinborough. On week days the park relies on the upper level parking deck adjacent to the office building. The deck provides 178 parking spaces. All of the office building's 463 spaces are available to park users on nights and weekends. Hawthorn Suites: The revised parking plan for Hawthorn provides 186 surface spaces. Eighty -six of the spaces are reserved for hotel guests, and 100 spaces would be shared with the park, on a non - exclusive basis. EXISTING STANDARDS FOR HOTEL SIGNAGE Zoning District PC -3 Permitted Free Standin Si ns: 1 per street frontage size: 100 square feet for 1st 50 square feet for all others Hawthorn Proposal: 100 square feet for 1st at southerly entry at Minnesota Drive 37 square feet for 2nd at Minnesota Drive and Edinborough Way Wall Signs: Permitted: 15$ of wall area Hawthorn Proposal: South wall 2 signs totalling 1% West wall 1 sign at 6% North Wall none East Wall none Other: Color: Green with illuminated white letters, green should match green in Edinborough signs and there should be some bright brass accents. �.,� :Y- � � �. i'i sue- '� c f .J M1 ' � � I � i �� * ,� ,> y � � � � � n K' 1 . t �. .��� a - rs v�=r`- ' ' � '�• OJT �. � *u — • `_; -.Y �. pff��, � R.:. "jsT�l". _ � 1 1 � A }_- L �'� Y 1 c5 x° , r� t � ': s 3-�-.� GSr. �� �i ' ��+ rte. -� y � - ' �. Nti / l N. M j 's �., �}' j % 1- 5 .s f � } �. 4 _ t `- Directional Sign 1' 6" x 4' 0" single face Directional Sign. Post and panel construction. Background painted to match PMS 342 green. White vinyl die cut logo and copy. Bronze PMS 4313 2" x 2" posts. c 4' -0" APPENDIX 0 ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825) TO ADD SUITES HOTEL TO MIXED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND TO ADD A DEFINITION OF SUITES HOTELS THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 14.B. is hereby amended by adding the following permitted use: 8. Suites Hotels Section 2. Section 3.D. is hereby amended by adding the following definition: SUITES HOTELS: A hotel in which at least 80 percent of the guest rooms are two -room suites containing at least 400 square feet of gross floor area. 0 EDINBOROUGH PARKING SUMMARY: CONDOMINIUMS: Underground garages Surface lots PARK PLAZA, SENIORS Underground garages Surface lot OFFICE Upper level ramp Lower level ramp Surface lot HAWTHORN SUITES PROPOSAL Surface lot Hotel only PARK PARKING SUMMARY WITH HOTEL Existing Weekdays Weekends and nights With Hotel Weekdays Weekends and nights 585 spaces 195 spaces 780 spaces 144 spaces 65 spaces 209 spaces 178 spaces 177 spaces 108 spaces 463 186 spaces 86 spaces Spaces Available 178 spaces 463 spaces 278 spaces 563 spaces 350 PARE AVENUE NEW TORE, NEW YORK 10022 (212)415 -9200 3 GRACECHURCH STREET LONDON EC3V OAT, ENGLAND 01- 929 -3334 06, RUE TRONCHET 73009 PARIS, FRANCE 01- 42- 66 -59 -49 040 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING P. O. BOX 848 ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 66903 (607)288 -3136 510 NORTH CENTRAL LIFE TOWER 445 MINNESOTA STREET, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 66101 (612)227 -8017 DORSEY & WHITNEY A Pew R...- P......owu Cowroa ." 2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 (612) 340 -2600 TELEX 29 -0603 TELECOPIER (612):440 -2868 THOMAS S. ERICKSON, P. A. (612) 340 -2659 April 26, 1989 Honorable Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota; and Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland, Director 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 1200 FIRST INTERSTATE CENTER 401 NORTH 31" STREET P. 0. BOX 7168 BILLINGS, MONTANA 89103 (406)262 -0800 201 DAVIDSON BUILDING 8 THIRD STREET NORTH GREAT FALLS, MONTANA 59401 (406)727 -3632 127 EAST FRONT STREET MISSOULA, MONTANA 59802 (406) 721- 60"...3 315 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 ( 612) 475 -0373 Re: Edinborough - Proposed Hotel Development Dear Commissioners and Mr. Rosland: At the meeting of April 17 regarding the above matter, the Commissioners raised two issues to which this letter is intended to respond. They were (i) when would certain fees be paid by the Developer and (ii) what assurance does the City have that the Project will get built and if not built the City can recover the property. Payment of Fees. All of the fees payable by the Purchaser of the Hotel Site will be payable.at closing in exchange for a deed from the HRA. Until that time, of course, there will be no proceeds from which to pay those fees. One exception to the foregoing statement is the Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000) which is payable to the City pursuant to Section 3.1(f)(ii) of the Redevelopment Agreement. That Section provides that the Fifty Thousand Dollars will be "payable when the structure and exterior of the (building] to be constructed , has been Substantially Completed; ". Substantially Completed is defined by the Agreement to be, as to the Hotel Site, at the time of "enclosure of the building . . as certified by the Building Official of the City." Construction of the Project. The Redevelopment Agreement provides that construction,of the Hotel Site must commence within thirty days after approval by the HRA of the construction plans and conveyance of the property to the Developer. It goes on to state that subject to "Unavoidable Delays" the Developer shall DoBSEY & WHITNEY April 26, 1989 Page Two complete the construction and receive a Certificate of Completion from the HRA within twenty -four months from the date of the deed from the HRA. Unavoidable Delays are defined as such things as strikes, adverse weather, fire or other casualty or other causes beyond the reasonable control of the Developer. The Agreement further provides that at closing the Developer will deliver to the HRA a policy of builders risk insurance in the amount equal to one hundred percent of the insurable value of the Hotel at the date of completion using the so- called "all- risk" form of policy.... The Agreement then provides that any damage or destruction to the building in excess of One Hundred Thousand Dollars are to be paid to an insurance trustee and to be used solely to repair, reconstruct and restore the damaged building. The money is paid out by the trustee only pursuant to the Developer's request for funds and a certificate from an independent engineer or appraiser that the work in fact has been done. In addition, the Agreement provides that a failure of the Developer to commence construction within the agreed upon time or to complete construction within the agreed upon time, again subject to "Unavoidable Delays," is a default under the Agreement. If such a default occurs the HRA has the right to give notice to the Developer and the Developer has a period of time to cure the default. If the default is not cured the HRA has a number of remedies available to it, one of which is to re -enter and take possession of the property and to terminate the ownership interest held by the Developer and to revest in the HRA all of the interest of the Developer in the property. The Agreement further provides that such re -entry and revesting in the HRA shall terminate the lien of any mortgage and that the rights of the HRA shall be 'prior to the rights of the holder of any mortgage then on the property, unless the holder of the mortgage undertakes to complete the improvements on the property, in which case the mortgage lien do.es not terminate but continues as a lien. The above provisions of the Agreement are designed to give some assurance to the HRA that the improvements imposed by the Developer will in fact be constructed. Of course, it is always possible that a Developer could contest the existence of a default, the propriety of any notice of default and the propriety of any revesting of title in the HRA. TSE : lmw Very truly yours, Th mas S. Erickson A . • ��bNpOM��O • BBB REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # HRA/COUNCIL-IV. From: GORDON L. HUGHES Consent ❑ ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER Information Only ❑ Date: OCTOBER 16, 1989 Mgr. Recommends Fx� To HRA Subject: Eil To Council .ACCEPTANCE OF OUTLOT A, fiction Motion VILLAGE HOMES OF CENTENNIAL LAKES . El Resolution - ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Accept the conveyance of Outlot A, Village Homes of Centennial Lakes. Info /Background: The subject outlot is an extremely small parcel .located in the southwestern corner of the Centennial Lakes Condominiums plat. This outlot is the only portion of the entire plat that is registered property. According to the Examiner-of Titles, if any portion of a plat is registered, then the entire plat must likewise be registered. In that this outlot adjoins W. 76th Street, as well as Centennial Lakes Park, the condominium developer has asked that it be transferred to the HRA in order to avoid the title registration action on the balance of the property. Staff can see no reason why we would not accept this conveyance. ,Ta - THE HOMES OF CENTENNIAL LAKES ........_.:t 'j ... I ... :,..M.,.. ( F -' I CaVt`7:� {!t ?:fit!.... DD! T iili`i so b ::i r•' N 1 °� S - vADARD D■■rl■ W w4' 4'a u DD 8 3 Q 8 B Sn —733.49-- —N 00°14'09 "W -- 9+ . ' VACELRATED JBt.69- __77.00•• -1 -- 274.80 -- �. f N 00°14.0 W a---- - - - - -- -------- - - - - ---------------- ► ----------------------------- ,5.02 as•Z – 100.00 • o N ; 1�:.4Arm►• a rpr r A %70 r r ! L4161IOLT LOS OF LOT 4/' Op O • S■ISEAST 66b0 s/! i ' STS I 1. ; T }� 2 '9 LmtnDa6 A - 04'33'04' i z2 i S I.OT t 1 * ■ �/ �i} 1 V4 0 0 `lJ:_ . L:t, {l'2t'•i..i`i t p a - -T-- l- 29.62 • 4' S r : [♦ • N V tJ4 j �l ..- � J1 N W ?� ( rye' '• .. ir6d ti Q 1 ! N 00 -14.08• r ��- r !- / o '� '•.� 4't g .00{ h j ii : :: n� 1 j 1 N o°SV,'aow w r Toby r N. ,u2Or r _ 8� 30 �� — N o0�4' r w�• ' 3% ,, u*o 36.30 _' ' ,s9.ov 37.79 11 0 ^ ■ ... :.:• � 11 11 � : l j �• t I a ,�. •,, •''. Ila X2 3 24 0 33 %- iy i nmnmxo °Onn LOT r'dn,■"r0a'mi ' touTr L 7707 Oc'` � Q.ocw` `S9" I', -__ • -- ,00.2, 226.99 �. 226.90 140.04 — �joO 'v 7084q3 –C7 L — — — — — S 00 °14 09" E . a><, LINE or Sc usr u66A25 W W T lr LgUR1 1 Or 7K A 4'/4 I acme 3D ua IM L m sw 1/ 11[ t0u1N - l6t p 6491 " t/a DRAMA DRAINAGE & U71UTV EASEME,TS ARE `� \ a�;��� DETAIL NO 64'.116 •�o �tSp r -:� GRAPHIC SCALE • \ Ss r� so Q 23 W ,q0 240 - - - - - - - - - - - - ' - - - - - _ a a $ �..R ■ re BEND 20 FEET IN MDTN AND ADJOINING ° C - ' v ;•, STREET UNES AS SIO,1N ON THE FLAT. Fe tf tf _ ° I In i ! DENOTES IRON MONUMENT BASIS FOR BEARINGS 15 BASED ON ASSUMED DATUM Yl 0 4 CEO LAND 3MVFVWO lR10. INC. r S SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL OCTOBER 2, 1989 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor Richards. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 18 AND SPECIAL MEETINGS OF MAY 8. JULY 6 AND AUGUST 21, 1989 APPROVED Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice to approve the Council Minutes of the Regular Meeting of September 18 and Special Meetings of May 8, July 6 and August 21, 1989. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED ON PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX INCREASE AND 1990 BUDGET Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Pursuant to due notice given, a public hearing was conducted on.a proposed increase in property taxes for 1990 and the proposed 1990 Budget for the City of Edina. Mayor Richards informed the audience that the Council has had preliminary meetings concerning the proposed 1990 Budget in which the Council had set certain parameters for staff to consider when submitting the initial budget draft. From those meetings and formal presentations made by various groups the Council asked staff to bring back and submit for the Council's consideration at this hearing, after additional input from the public, a proposed budget to be adopted for 1990. Mayor Richards presented these 1990 Budget highlights: 1) Salaries are proposed to be increased 3 %, 2) An increase of approximately $225,000 is proposed for new programs, e.g. $75,000 for comparable worth adjustments, $50,000 for elections, $75,000 for recyling and addition of a drug enforcement officer. Total budget would call for an increase of 4.7% over the 1989 Budget. That would amount to an increase of 1/2 of 1% impact on the real.estate tax dollar. Mayor Richards advised that as mandated by truth in taxation legislation, notice of this hearing was published in the Minneapolis Star Tribune, being the qualifying newspaper with the broadest circulation in the City. Manager Rosland commented that the truth in taxation legislation mandates cities to hold public hearings on proposed property tax increases and 1990 budgets as the outcome of the state government supporting so many communities to a great extent with local government aid dollars. The City of Edina presently receives and was proposed to receive $572,000 for 1990. The tax bill passed in the special session would take that aid from the City and give it to the School District so that in essence the affect on Edina .'s taxpayer would be a wash. There is a big push for the state to give tax relief to many cities; unfortunately, Edina is not considered to need any form of tax relief. Manager Rosland pointed out that the present tax bill provides for a $66 million increase. Of this, $35 million would come from western Hennepin County suburbs, $56 million from the metro area, and approximately $7 million would come from outstate. The down side is that there is great tax relief going on in outstate Minnesota and in other communities. Though the current tax bill probably is not good for Edina, the direction to get local governments and counties out of state aids is an appropriate one. If the aids to be given to the school districts is on a per capita formula, Edina will be better off in the long run. r Manager Rosland stated that the City Council does not control a large portion of the tax dollar. Although property valuations are made by the City Assessor, if too low the county automatically increases those valuations. What the City Council does do, however, is to strive to keep expenditures down and services at the best possible level. Graphics were presented illustrating: 1) Effect of a 4.7% City levy increase (proposed 1990 Budget) - 1/2 of 1% increase in total tax bill 2) Property Tax Distribution - School 50.9 %, County 30.9 %, City 11.2%, Miscellaneous Metro 7.0% 3) 1988 Tax Levy Increase - School 24.1 %, County 12.9 %, City 5.0% 4) Total Expenditures by Area - Public Safety 45 %, Public Works 24 %, General Government 14 %, Parks 13 %, Non - Departmental 4% 5) Total Expenditures by Type - Salaries 52 %, Central Services 21 %, Contractual Services 14 %, Equipment 7 %, Commodities 5% 6) Distribution of Revenues by Type - Taxes 73 %, Fees and Charges 15 %, Intergovernmental Aid 7 %, Licenses and Permits 5% Mayor Richards stated that copies of all letters received concerning the property tax increase and 1990 Budget have been circulated to the Council Members. Public comment was then heard from the following citizens:,Susan Palombo, 4624 Browndale Avenue, who questioned the need for a drug enforcement officer; Carlton Bailey, 4509 Drexel Avenue, who objected to the proposed budget increase; Bill Venell, 4614 Drexel Avenue, who asked why Edina does not deserve tax relief; Robert Anthony, 301 Griffit Street, who stated that he felt the proposed increase was justified and asked for clarification of golf course earnings reflected in the Capital Plan; John Palombo, 4624 Drexel Avenue, who asked if there is something in the current tax bill that will give tax relief in the future; Jack Washam, 4508 Drexel Avenue, who objected to the proposed budget increase and the increases in property taxes over the last two years, and expressed concern that increases in valuations of homes be spread throughout the City; Patrick Manion, 6121 Crescent Drive, who asked if the proposed 1990 Budget was final; William Cooper, 5500 Mirror Lakes Drive, who questioned how market value of homes were determined. Mayor Richards then declared the public hearing closed, stating that the public comments made would be taken into account. He said it would be the intent that the Council would formally adopt the 1990 Budget at the meeting of October 16, 1989. Any citizen with additional comments should contact the Council or attend that meeting. Member Kelly asked if the budgeted amount for South Hennepin Human Services Council is at the 4.7% increase. Manager Rosland responded that it is. Member Smith commented that the increases in property taxes last year were due to a variety of reasons, e.g. re- evaluation of homes in some cases, School District increase of almost 25 %, County budget increase of 12.9$; City increase of 5% and state mandated programs. He reiterated that the proposed 4.7% would equate to an increase in total tax bill of 1/2 of 1 %. Member Paulus said that she had received calls from residents who were concerned that, because they have not made improvements to their homes, they would not be able to sell them for as much as the homes down the street who have made major improvements. They feel their property taxes are increasing because of improvements happening in their neighborhoods over which they have no control. A second concern is that there is not an equal worth in houses because many homes are improved without applying for building permits. Mayor Richards expressed appreciation to the citizens who attended the hearing. *AMENDMENTS TO SUBDIVISION AND ZONING ORDINANCES CONTINUED TO 10116/89 Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by.Member Rice to continue the matter of Amendments to the Subdivison and Zoning Ordinances to October 16, 1989. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *_AMENDMENT TO FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. EDINBOROUGH (HAWTHORN EDINA. INC.) CONTINUED TO 10116/89 Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice to continue the matter of Amendment to Final Development Plan, Edinborough (Hawthorn Edina, Inc.) to October 16, 1989. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO. 825 - TO ADD A HOTEL AS A PERMITTED USE IN MMD -5 DISTRICT CONTINUED TO 10/16/89 Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice to continue the matter of Amendment to Ordinance No. 825 - To Add a Hotel as a Permitted Use in MMD -5 District to October 16, 1989. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR LEO EVANS PROPERTY Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute various separate parcels: WEGNER TRACT: All that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 32, Township 117, Range 21, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the West line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter distant 425.4 feet North from the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 32; thence North 87 degrees East a distance of 406.15 feet, thence north parallel with the West line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 107.25 feet, thence South 87 degrees West a distance of 406.15 feet to the West line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, thence South along said West line a distance of 107.25 feet to the point of beginning. EVANS TRACT: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 32, Township 117, Range 21, described as follows: Beginning at a point which center line of County Road intersects the West line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence South along said West line 260 feet to a point 382 feet North of the Southwest corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence parallel with center line of said County Road North 87 degrees East 565 feet to an iron post; thence North 46 degrees 36 minutes East 460.3 feet to an iron post; thence North 24 degrees 31 minutes East 319.1 feet; thence North 53 degrees 39 minutes East 225 feet more or less to the East line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence North to the Northeast corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence West and Southwesterly following centerline of said County Road.to point of beginning, EXCEPT therefrom all that part lying Southerly and Southeasterly of the Northerly and Northwesterly line of EDINA HIGHLANDS LAKESIDE ADDITION, and further excepting therefrom all of the land above described as the WEGNER TRACT. WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to subdivide said tracts into the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "Parcels "): WEGNER TRACT: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 32, Township 117, Range 21, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the west line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter with the northerly line of EDINA HIGHLANDS LAKESIDE ADDITION; thence easterly along the northerly line of said EDINA HIGHLANDS LAKESIDE ADDITION 406.15 feet; thence northerly and parallel with the west line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter 107.25 feet; thence westerly and parallel with the northerly line of EDINA HIGHLANDS LAKESIDE ADDITION 406.15 feet to the west line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence southerly along the west line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter 107.25 feet to the point -of beginning. The north line of EDINA HIGHLANDS LAKESIDE ADDITION is marked by Judicial Landmarks set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 14146. EVANS TRACT: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 32, Township 117, Range 21, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the Northerly line of EDINA HIGHLANDS LAKESIDE ADDITION distant 406.15 feet East along said Northerly line from the hest line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, said Northerly line is marked by Judicial Landmarks set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 14146; thence North parallel with the West line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, 107.25 feet; thence West, parallel with said Northerly line, 406.15 feet to said West line; thence North along said West line 144.86 feet, more or less, to the center line of County Road No. 158; thence Northeasterly along said center line to the East line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence South along said East line to the most Northerly corner of EDINA HIGHLANDS LAKESIDE ADDITION; thence Southwesterly and Westerly along the Northerly line of said addition, which line was determined in Torrens Case No. 14146, to the point of beginning. WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivison and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina. Ordinance Nos. 801 and 825; NOWT, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Resolution adopted on rollcall vote, five ayes. DECISION OF BOARD OF APPEALS UPHELD: LOT WIDTH AND AREA VARIANCE GRANTED WITH CONDITIONS FOR NEW HOME AT 5616 WOODDALE AVENUE Planner Phil Dommer presented the appeal of the homeowners at 5600 Wooddale Avenue for the Board,of Appeals decision to grant a lot width and area variance to build a new home on a 45' lot at 5616 Wooddale Avenue. He explained that the subject property is an existing platted lot measuring 45' x 187' which is developed with a single family home and large garage. The property is in a line of six 45 foot wide lots. Four of the lots have been combined into two 90 foot lots. The subject property and an adjacent property remain as 45 foot lots. Other lots in the area are 60 feet wide or greater. Planner Dommer stated that the homeowner desires to tear down the existing home and build a new house. A lot width and area variance are required to build on the substandard lot. At issue is the size of the lot; the current Zoning Ordinance does not permit building or re- building on lots that are 45 feet wide, nor on lots less than 9,000 square feet. The Board of Appeals heard the variance request at their meeting of September 7, 1989 and reviewed the plan submitted by the proponent illustrating the new house for the property. Following review and comment from neighbors, the Board recommended approval of the variance request. Subsequently, the homeowner at 5600 Wooddale submitted a letter appealing,the decision and was joined in the appeal later on by five other neighbors. Mayor Richards called for comment from the proponent. Robert Kosky, 5616 Wooddale Avenue, commented that he had not been given copies of the letters from the neighbors prior to this meeting. He said one of the complaints raised is that the proposed new structure would not be in keeping with current homes in the neighborhood. He presented photos of his existing house and of homes in the immediate neighborhood pointing out that a home to the north is not in keeping with the neighborhood. Mr. Kosky noted that the Board of Appeals did not place any stipulations on granting of the variance. He said that he has owned the property for more than 13 years and finally is in a financial position to change the structure. Further, that he has gone through several design changes in the last five years in trying to meet the City's requirement for maximum square footage on a lot. He pointed out that it is very difficult to design a house to fit on a 45 foot lot. The front door is oriented to the north because that is the only way the design fits the physical constraints of the property. Mr. Kosky referred to the concern of his neighbor, Evelyn Gunn at 5606 Wooddale Avenue, concerning the driveway. He said that there was a problem some years back with a prior owner of the property. The City put a curb cut in for a driveway that according to the survey is partly on her property. Mr. Kosky said he had no intention of moving the driveway from the existing south side of the structure and that if the City wishes to reinstate the curb at that point he said he would have no problem with that, other than who would pay for that. As to other concerns raised in the letter signed by the neighbors, Mr. Kosky said they are strictly personal opinions as to aesthetics of the proposed structure. He observed that there are no two houses the same on either side of the street for three blocks in any direction and to say that any one building is out of compliance with the appearance of the neighborhood is difficult to do. Member Kelly asked if the Board of Appeals had seen the design of the proposed house. Mr. Kosky said they went over the plans at some length. David Lee, 5600 Wooddale Avenue, stated that he objected to the design of the new house because it does not fit with the neighborhood which is largely Colonial and Cape Code. It is quite blockish, has a flat roof and the main entrance is to the side as opposed to the front and the neighbors are concerned that it will affect their property values. He stated that some of the neighbors did not receive notice of the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Mayor Richards asked Mr. Lee if his only concern was the style of the house and whether he had any problem with the granting of the lot width and area variance. Mr. Lee responded that Mr. Kosky has a right to build on his property but that he would like to see a structure that would fit in. Member Paulus queried Mr. Lee as to who he felt should have the right to say what is appealing and not appealing. She commented that when an individual applies for a building permit certain setback requirements have to be met but there is no requirement as to the design of the house. Mr. Lee said he would like to see something that is no larger than the existing structure as the lot really does not support a larger structure. Carol Gunn Evers stated that she is not a resident of Edina but grew up in the City and wanted to address the issue of her mother's house (5606 Wooddale) which is within 45 feet of the subject property. She said that over the last four years her mother has had to put up with the deteriorating conditions on the subject property and at times with the parking of a trailer and motor home that extended onto her property. Mrs. Evers cited the recommendation from the staff report which stated "In areas of narrow lots, however, siting and window /door orientation is critical. ... Granting of the variance without conditions to orient the 'home to the front and rear in a traditional manner would be injurious to adjacent properties. In the City of Edina unique style homes are common place. In areas of close proximity and uniformity strikingly unique plans as those presented alter the essential character of the surroundings and may threaten property values of the adjacent properties." She said that her mother was concerned about violation of property lines when the existing house is demolished and materials are hauled in for the new house. She also had a concern as to how respectful the useage of the north fronting entrance will be as long as a curb cut continues to be in place on the'north side of the property. Mrs. Evers concluded by saying that her mother is faced with her major investment, her property, being threatened. Craig Scofield, 5601 Wooddale Avenue, stated that he did not personally know the owner of the subject property, that he grew up two houses from where he is living presently and moved back to Edina because of its strict code compliance. He noted that most of the houses in that area of Wooddale are Colonial or Cape Code in style. Mr. Scofield commented that, although it was not up to him to say what kind of house Mr. Kosky should build, few houses in Edina have side entrances. He concluded by saying that new homes in Edina should go with the neighborhood. In response to the concerns expressed, Mr. Kosky stated that the proposed new house is not bigger than the existing one, certainly not in width. He said that the trailer referred to was a truck, since has been removed, and was not parked in violation of any ordinance. He commented that he did not realize the vehicle was parked three feet onto the neighbor's property and would have moved it sooner. Mr. Kosky stated that if the City is willing to remove the curb cut it should be removed. As to comment about the flat roof, he said that the existing house has a flat roof over 40% of the building and the house diagonally from the Lee residence has a flat roof on the attached garage. He reiterated that there is not much that can be done regarding design on a 45 foot lot and still have a driveway. Member Smith made a motion to reverse the decision of the Board of Appeals and to deny the variance request, based upon the staff recommendation for denial. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Member Paulus asked Planner Dommer if staff felt the siting /door orientation could be redesigned and if this has been discussed with the proponent. Planner Dommer said staff believed those points can be redesigned. Member Paulus asked counsel if the variance could be granted with conditions. Attorney Erickson opined that it could be granted subject to the re- orientation of the house (normal front yard, back yard arrangement). Because this is a legal, non - conforming lot it does require a variance; however, all requirements for the variance have been met. The Council could require as a condition to granting the variance, to protect the adjacent properties and to further the spirit and intent of the ordinance, that the house be re- oriented to the normal front yard, back yard arrangement. Mayor Richards called the question. Rollcall: Ayes: Smith Nays: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards Motion defeated. Following further discussion, Member Paulus made a motion to uphold the decision of the Board of Appeals and to grant the lot width and area variance, subject to the house being redesigned so that the front entrance is oriented to the east and that the outdoor living areas are oriented east /west. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith Nays: Richards Motion carried. Mayor Richards commented that he voted no for the reason that he did not support any conditions being attached to granting of the variance. Mayor Richards cautioned that, to avoid any arguments in the future, the redesigned plan be shown to the neighbors and if there is any reasonable doubt as to the conclusion reached that the plan be brought back to the Council to make sure that it complies with the intent of the motion passed by the Council. FIRST READING GRANTED FOR ORDINANCE NO. 451 -A6 (ADDING REGUTATIONS FOR MDD -6 DISTRICT) Planner Craig Larsen presented the proposed amendment to-Ordinance No. 451 advising that currently there are no sign regulations for the Mixed Development District, MDD -6 (Centennial Lakes). The proposed amendment would add specific requirements for the MDD -6 District. It would establish requirements for overall development signage, signage on individual projects within the development, and for retail - commercial as a principal use. The proposed requirements for wall signs for retail - commercial would be the same as for all other retail uses in the City. Signage requirements for the office, residential and park uses remain the same as in other Mixed Development Districts. Member Kelly asked why we would allow the same type of signage on the retail component in the Mixed Development District as is allowed for Southdale or the Galleria as it does not have the same square footage and would impact differently because of the mixed uses. Planner Larsen responded that the intent was to treat the retail usage in Centennial Lakes the same as if were a free standing retail use elsewhere in the City. Member Smith said he was concerned about the orientation of the signage toward the residential and park components of the mixed use development. He said that he felt the proposed ordinance amendment should deal with that issue. Planner Larsen said.that the signage that is proposed for the Centennial Lakes project conforms to the ordinance amendment and none of the proposed signage that staff has seen to date orients towards the park or the residential side of the development. An additional requirement that it does not orient to those areas would be in order. Member Smith then introduced Ordinance No. 451 -A6 for First Reading as presented and on file in the office of the City Clerk, subject to an addendum prior to adoption that would address orientation. Motion for First Reading was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards First Reading granted. *HEARING DATE OF 10116189 SET FOR ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO ALLOW PRIVATE CLUBS IN PC -1 COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Motion was made by Member Kelly and was, seconded by Member Rice to set October 16, 1989 as hearing date for a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to Allow Private Clubs in the PC -1 Commercial District. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *AWARD OF BID FOR STORM SEVER IMPROVEMENT NO.S STS -195, STS -196 AND STS -200 CONTINUED TO 10/16/89 Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice to continue to October 16, 1989 the award of bid for Storm Sewer Improvement Nos. STS -195, STS -196 and STS -200. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *_BIDS REJECTED FOR VAN VALKENBURG PARK LIGHTING. SCOREBOARD & P.A. SYSTEM: PROJECTS TO BE RE -BID Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice to reject all bids for Van Valkenburg Park lighting, scoreboard and public address system and directing that the projects be re -bid. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. BIDS REJECTED FOR ART CENTER EXPANSION: PROJECT TO BE RE -BID Park and Recreation Director Kojetin advised that all bids opened for the Art Center Expansion exceeded the $200,000 budget that had been approved by the Council for the project. Staff would recommend rejection of all bids and that the project be re -bid. Staff would also recommend that the specifications for re -bid include a completion date of June, 1990 in order to eliminate an increase of 7% for winter construction. Director Kojetin said that staff would be working with the project architect to re- orient some of the design within the plans to bring the project in at a cost of of approximately $185,000. Following discussion, Member Smith made a motion to reject all bids for the Art Center Expansion and to direct that the project be re -bid. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. PIIBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED ON PROPOSED ISSUANCE BY THE CITY OF G.O. TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS: RESOLUTION ADOPTED AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE AND PROVIDING FOR PIIBLIC SALE THEREOF Pursuant to due notice given, a public hearing was conducted on the proposed issuance by the City of Edina of General Obligation Tax increment Refunding Bonds. The proposal is that the City issue its general obligation tax increment refunding bonds (the Refunding Bonds) in order to refund in advance of their maturity all or a portion of the City's General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985, dated September 1, 1985, in the aggregate principal amount of $12,000,000. Finance Director John Wallin stated that this public hearing is being conducted for the following reasons: 1) To solicit public comment, 2) To facilitate Council discussion, and 3) To call for public sale of the refunding bonds. He advised that currently interest rates have risen since the proposal was initiated making it no longer feasible to reach the $400,000 debt service savings in accordance with prior direction of the Council in March of 1987 and at the public hearing held April 18, 1988. Finance Director Wallin said that this public hearing and discussion would expedite the process if interest rates drop. He indicated that bond counsel was present to respond to questions. Member Kelly stated that it has been the City's position not to call bonds and asked if a shortfall is anticipated that would precipitate refunding the-bonds. Manager Rosland recalled that at both prior public hearings concerning bond refunding the Council approved the refunding if a debt service savings of $400,000 would be realized. He pointed out that the 1985 Series was the first issue to provide a refunding mechanism. The Council again can decide whether to approve or disapprove the bond refunding. As to potential shortfall, Manager Rosland stated that there was no potential shortfall when the two prior hearings were held for bond refunding. Presently, because there is housing within the City's tax increment districts, there is a potential for shortfall on the bonds in six or seven years because of-legislative action to do away with the homestead credit. Mayor Richards observed that by that time there may be further development within the district and that it was important to note that this is not something that will, in fact, occur. Member Smith asked if the buyers of these bonds did so knowing that the City had the ability to call them and if this was taken into account when the bonds were purchased. In response, Director Wallin said that was correct. Member Smith then asked how the process could be- expedited so that we could take advantage of the lower interest rate window. Jerry Gilligan, bond counsel, said that the Council could take action calling for sale with an indefinite date, or with a definite date to be continued from time to time, when the market appears ready and authorize staff to proceed when the savings are there at the level set by the Council. Member Rice asked for the rationale in setting the $400,000 savings threshold. Attorney Gilligan said that under state statute there is a 3% limit for full defeasance. Member Kelly asked if this would do anything to the City's bond rating. Attorney Gilligan stated that since the City would'be getting savings it should enhance rather than hurt the bond rating as it would be considered a prudent financial action. Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS; AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE THEREOF BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) as follows: 1. Authorization. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178 and Chapter 475 the City has issued its General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985 (the SEries 1985 Bonds) in the original principal amount of $12,000,000. The Series 1985 Bonds are presently in the amount of $11,850,000. The City presently estimates that it can effect a substantial annual debt service savings by refunding the outstanding bonds described above which are callable for redemption and prepayment by the City in advance of their maturities in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.67; and the City hereby authorized the issuance and sale of up to $13,400,000 in aggregate principal amount of general obligation refunding bonds (the Bonds), the proceeds of which, together with other available moneys of the City, shall be used for this purpose, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.52. 2. Terms of Bonds: Sale Date. The City Manager is hereby authorized to set a sale date for the Bonds at such time as it is expected that the present value of the debt service on the Bonds is at least $400,000 less than the debt service on the SEries 1985 Bonds to be refunded, all as computed in accordance with Section 475.67, subdivision 12. At such sale date this Council shall meet for the purpose of approving the terms of the Bonds and considering bids for the purchase thereof. ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk Motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED ON ON -SALE DINE LICENSE FEES Pursuant to due notice given, a public hearing was conducted to consider increasing the fees for on -sale wine licenses in accordance with Chapter 104 (H.F. 1405), 1989 Legislative Session. Mayor Richards noted that a letter objecting to the fee increase had been received from Bravo! Ristorante Italiano, 3910 West 50th Street. Mayor Richards called for public comment on the proposed license fee increase. No comment or objection was heard. Member Smith moved approval of the proposed increase in on -sale wine license fees as presented. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. PROPOSED FEES"AND CHARGES FOR 1990 PRESENTED Finance Director Wallin presented the schedule of proposed Fees and Charges for 1990 for the General Fund and Enterprise Funds. Member Kelly asked if the proposed fees and charges would meet the City's costs and'if Building Department fees are comparable to what other cities are charging. Manager Rosland said that the department heads were asked to take two things into consideration, e.g. the burden rate as well as a reasonable increase in proposing fees and charges for 1990. Most of the fees and charges in the enterprise funds are meeting costs. He stated that many of the Building Department fees are based on the State Building Code, also that they are comparable to what other communities are charging. Member Kelly also asked how much of the ambulance charge would normally be reimbursable by health insurance and that she was concerned that the charge is getting so high that individuals may hesitate to call for the service when needed. Further, she asked what percentage of the billings are being collected and what Hennepin County charges for ambulance service. Chief Paulfranz said that the amount of reimbursement depends on the type of coverage. A lot of people are covered by Medicare and Medicaid and depending on the services performed enroute to the hospital Medicare may or may not pay. He stated that citizens in Edina are paying 20 -30% out of their own pockets. Presently the City is collecting 96% of the ambulance billings. Hennepin County charges more for comparable ambulance services. Member Smith asked if the proposed fees and charges for Park and Recreation have been reviewed by the Park Board. Director Wallin responded that those -were approved by the Park Board at their last meeting. Further discussion was focused on fees for vending machines, special assessment searches and Planning Department fees for developments as to recovering costs. Finance Director Wallin referred to the proposed water and sewer rate increases and explained that the rate increase is due to higher sewage treatment costs. He stated that sanitary sewer charges account for approximately 75% of the utility bill with virtually all of this attributable to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission charges. Staff would propose that the increase be weighted towards the water rate side for several reasons: 1) Low water rates encourage heavier use during dry summer periods and cause water shortages that threaten the Fire Department's ability to fight fires and result in high repairs bills for pumping equipment, and 2) To encourage conservation of water during the summer months. Discussion followed with the majority of the Council not in favor of the staff recommendation. Mayor Richards asked that a modified proposal be brought back on October 16 for consideration by the Council. Mayor Richards said the proposed fees and charges would be formally approved when the 1990 Budget will be adopted. *RESOLUTION ADOPTED APPROVING 1990 -91 COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES PLAN UPDATE Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAN FOR PROVISION OF C010MITY HEALTH SERVICES IN THE CITY OF EDINA AND THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR THE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES ACT SUBSIDY WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina is the official governing body of the City of Edina and functions as the official Board of Health in•the City of Edina; and WHEREAS, the City Council is committed to promote, support and maintain the health of the entire community at the highest level; and WHEREAS, the Community Health Services Act provides for subsidies in support of public health services on the local level throughout the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, a special needs study has been made and a special public meeting held relative to the needs and priorities of the community for Community Health Services; and WHEREAS, the Community Health Services Advisory Committee of the City of Edina has reviewed the plan for the provision of public health services in the City of Edina an4 recommends its approval to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed this self -same plan and finds it consistent with the needs and priorities of the community as determined by the Community Health Services Advisory Committee and as expressed by the citizens of Edina; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that the Community Health Services Plan for the City of Edina is approved and authorization is hereby given to submit an application for the Community Health Services Act subsidy for the years 1990 -91. ADOPTED this 2nd day of October, 1989. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. APPOINTMENT TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION TO BE MADE 10/16/89 Mayor Richards stated that he had a name to submit for appointment on October 16 to the Community Development and Planning Commission to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of Del M. Johnson. The resume of the individual will be forwarded to the Council Members prior to that meeting. If any other individuals are to be considered names should be submitted prior thereto. *HEARING DATE OF 11106/89 SET FOR VACATION OF OLD COUNTY ROAD RIGHT OF WAY (LEO EVANS PROPERTY) Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice for - adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION CALLING PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF EASEMENT FOR STREET PURPOSES BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. It is hereby found and determined that the following described easement for street purposes should be considered for vacation, in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 412.851 and 160.29: The old road sometimes referenced as "the old County Road" or the "old Eden Prairie road" lying within the following described property: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 32, Township 117, Range 21, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the northerly line of EDINA HIGHLANDS LAKESIDE ADDITION distant 406.15 feet East along said northerly line from the west line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, said northerly line is marked by Judicial landmarks set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 14146; thence North, parallel with the west line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, 107.25 feet; thence West, parallel with said northerly line, 406.15 feet to said West line; thence North along said West line 144.86 feet, more or less, to the center line of County Road No. 158; thence northeasterly along said center line to the East line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence South along said East line to the most northerly corner of EDINA HIGHLANDS LAKESIDE ADDITION; thence southwesterly and westerly along the northerly line of said addition, which line was determined in Torrens Case No. 14146, to the point of beginning. Except, however, that this vacation shall not include the existing right of way for County Road No. 158, also known as Vernon Avenue, or the existing right of way for Olinger Road. 2. This Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the form of notice included in paragraph 3 hereof for the purpose of holding a public hearing on whether such vacation shall be made in the interest of the public. 3. The Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and purpose of said hearing to be published once a week for two weeks, in the Edina Sun - Current, being the official newspaper of the City, the first publication at least 14 days prior to the date of such hearing and to post such notice, at least 14 days prior to the date of such hearing, in at least three (3) public and conspicuous places within the City, as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851. Such notice shall be in substantially the following form: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF EASEMENT FOR STREET RIGHT OF WAY PURPOSES IN THE CITY OF EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, will meet at the.Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street on November 6, 1989 at 7:00 p.m., for the purpose of holding a public hearing on the proposed vacation of the following easement for street right of way purposes: (Same as legal description in paragraph 1. above) All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not the above proposed street vacation is in the public interest and should be made shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the extent to which such proposed street vacation affects existing easements within the area of the proposed vacation and.the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric, telephone, or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto, for the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to which any or all of any such easements, and such authority to maintain, and to enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. LETTER FROM WHITE OAKS IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION ACKNOWLEDGED Assistant Manager Hughes referred to the September 19, 1989 letter from the White Oaks Improvement Association concerning the acquisition and preservation of the Townes Road Marsh. He recommended that the Council consider adoption of a resolution, that the marsh remain in a "natural condition" as requested by the Association, after the closing on the property scheduled for October 9, 1989. LETTER FROM U.S. CONFERENCE OF MAYORS REGARDING CHARLESTON HURRICANE DISASTER Manager Rosland referred to a letter from the U.S. Conference of Mayors conveying Charleston Mayor Joe Riley's request for help following the recent hurricane disaster. He said he also had received a phone call from a resident suggesting that the City participate in aiding the victims. In checking with the local Salvation Army agency they indicated that there no longer is a need for clothing, food only is needed through Friday of this week, but diapers for babies are still needed. Manager Rosland said staff could work on collection of assistance if the Council so directed. Member Kelly asked if the phone number of the Salvation Army has been published in the Star Tribune and suggested the it be put in the Edina Sun - Current, on cable and /or on the bulletin board at City Hall so that individuals who wished to participate in the relief effort could do so on a personal basis. Member Rice commented that the President has been down there and has offered several billion dollars in disaster relief and that it would be a waste of staff time although well intentioned. No formal action was taken. SHHSC BUDGET REVISIONS REPORTED Member Kelly reported that at the board meeting of South Hennepin Human Services Council (SHHSC) last week the decision was made not to fund the position of administrative assistant. The work will be done on a parttime basis by extending the hours of an individual already employed. Also, SHHSC is still working on the Northgate project in an attempt to get rent -free space. BOARD OF EDUCATION STRATEGIC PLANNING MEETING POSTPONED Member Paulus reported that the Board of Education Strategic Planning Meeting that was scheduled for September 20 was cancelled and will be rescheduled. PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION OF COMPLAINTS ON RENTAL PROPERTY DISCUSSED Member Kelly said she had received a phone call from a citizen on Limerick Lane who lives next door to a home that is being rented. The renter is a psychologist, a woman with two children, who apparently is using the home as a shelter for run away teenagers. A number of things have occurred, the last being fireworks and other disturbances resulting in the police being called. The citizen is asking that the owner of the property should be notified if police are called to the rental property. The citizen had obtained the name of the property owner and had called to report the incident. The owner had responded that he had no knowledge that this was going on. Another question is the number of unrelated people and /or transients that can live within a home. Manager Rosland commented that when the Police Department goes to a home they have no way of knowing if this is rental property. This is a tough problem because the owner also would not know that the property is being misused. Assistant Manager Hughes explained that the Zoning Ordinance does not prohibit unrelated people from living together in a dwelling. As to transients, he recalled the case of the home on Waterman Avenue when a lot of research was done on the issue. The other requirement deals with customary home occupations. If the psychologist is practicing out of the home there would be a limitation on employees working in the home. No individuals could be employed in that business other than the residents of the dwelling. Member Kelly said that she understood that Planner Larsen had contacted the renter at the subject house and had dealt with the issue. She said she understood why an ordinance that would provide for notification of the property owner on these types of complaints would not be feasible. Manager Rosland said that these cases have to be dealt with one at a time. No action was taken. REQUEST FOR STOP SIGN AT JEFFREY LANE NOTED Member Kelly said she had received a phone call regarding the issue of a stop sign at Jeffrey Lane because of the crosswalk that has now been marked following reconstruction of Blake Road. She asked if that was a requirement because of the crosswalk. Engineer Hoffman said that point on Blake Road was chosen for the crosswalk because it provided the greatest sight distances from both directions. Member Kelly said she had told the caller to present the.request to the Traffic Safety Committee. CONCERN EXPRESSED REGARDING COMMUNICATION WITH CITY HALL Member Kelly expressed her concern regarding the information she had received from the City Planner relating to the redevelopment proposal for the Lewis Engineering /Kunz Oil property. She said it was embarrassing to have related information to citizens that this matter would not be brought to the Council for several months and then to have found the item on the HRA Agenda for this meeting necessitating her calling the citizens back to tell them that it was on the current agenda. She said she was concerned that the Planner did not have current information on the status of the redevelopment. Manager Rosland said he would apologize for any lack of communication and would discuss this with the staff involved. Member Smith noted that this was a redevelopment issue which is normally handled by the HRA Director and that the call may have been more appropriately directed to that individual. SCHOOL BOARD/PARK BOARD MEMBER DISCUSSED Member Rice made reference to the Edina Park Board minutes of September 12, 1989 in regard to the school board member issue. The minutes indicated that a suggestion has been made that the School Board should appoint a member at large from the district who would represent the School Board at the meetings of the Park Board. Park Director Bob Kojetin explained that the suggestion was made because Scott Johnson, the School Board representative, has not attended meetings for approximately the last year. He said that he had reminded the Park Board members that the ordinance requires that the Park Board membership shall include a member of the School Board and any change from that would require amending the ordinance. The Park Board recommended that the ordinance be changed or modified to accommodate the situation. Bob Christianson, Park Board Chair, had indicated that he would discuss this with the School Board and the Mayor concerning the process and additional information will then be provided to the Council. RECYCLING HOTLINE PROCEDURE CRITICIZED Member Paulus said that she was concerned about the response from the BFI recycling hotline when she had called that number the past two weeks because her recycling had not been picked up. She said the person answering the hotline had suggested that the recyling be held until the next week for pickup and that the manner in which the call was handled was rude. She said she was concerned because the contract with BFI provides for pickup of recyclables once a week and that they are being paid accordingly. She said she was disappointed that the hotline calls are being handled in such a negative way. Member Smith said he had the same problem with how the recycling program is being handled. He said he had purposely left his container at the curb to see if a notice about location would be left. No notice was left and the container also was not returned to the garage. He said the City is paying for pickup at the garage with return of the container and the job is not getting done. Also, the residents are still confused as to placement'of recyclables, garbage and yard waste. HEALTH STANDARDS AT COMMUNITY CENTER QUESTIONED Member Paulus reported that she had received several phone calls from citizens that are concerned about the health standards at the Edina Community Center. Specifically, they complained that the restrooms near the Early Childhood, Special Education and Community Education areas are not fit for public use and that there is a rodent problem. Member Smith responded that the Community Center Board has debated the custodial care of the building, that they have had trouble with custodians and that the problem would be handled. LETTERS CONCERN POLICY ON GOLF LEAGUES REFERRED TO PARK DIRECTOR Mayor Richards stated he had received a number of letters about the policy relating to golf leagues which he referred to Park Director Kojetin. He asked when this would be on the Council Agenda. Director Kojetin said it would be discussed by the Park Board at their October 10 meeting and a recommendation would then be brought to the Council. *CIAIMS PAID Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice to approve payment of the following claims as per pre -list dated 10/10/89: General Fund $128,356.06, C.D.B.G. $3,318.41, Communications $3,944.68, Art Center $5,615.00, Swimming Pool Fund $162.95, Golf Course Fund $13,859.13, Recreation Center Fund $1,577.24, Gun Range Fund $2,186.18, Edinborough Park $10,616.01, Utility Fund $250,316.84, Storm Sewer Utility $182.62, Liquor Dispensary Fund $11,311.14, Construction Fund $15,631.90, Total $447,078.16 Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the meeting adjourned at 11:08 p.m. City Clerk s/y MINUTES OF SPECIAL BUDGET MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL AUGUST 8. 1989 5:00 P.M. Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor Richards. Pursuant to due notice given, the Council met in the Manager's Conference Room of City Hall to begin review and consideration of the proposed 1990 Budget for the City of Edina. 1990 BUDGET PRESENTED Manager Rosland presented the proposed 1990 Budget for the City of Edina stating that it is based upon the programs and projections outlined in the budget assumptions presented to the Council on June 19, 1989. The proposed 1990 Budget responds to the direction received from the Council at that time and represents a 5.0% increase over 1989. Depending upon anticipated legislative action, the City should be within its levy limit. Salaries are proposed to be increased by 3% and an overall increase of 5.0% in revenue from licenses /permits and fees /charges is recommended. Presentations were made by Larry Oppold, Executive Director, South Hennepin Human Services Council (SHHSC) and Otto Byrne, Chairman of the Human Relations Commission, on funding requests summarized as follows: SHHSC - Budget request for 1990 is $21,385 which is based on $.47 per capita for the City of Edina. Reasons for the increase of $7,735 over 1989 were: 1) SHHSC has the possibility of moving into the old Northgate School, located near I -494 and Portland Avenue, which is being developed by Robert E. Miller (REM) as a human services center. If SHHSC does move to the human services center, Bloomington will no longer be willing to provide the entire cash funding required for building space. Bloomington has provided office space in Creeksi4e Center as an in- kind' contribution. The four cities are being asked for a portion of the rent dollars for office space. 2) SHHSC is requesting the addition of one half -time planner in 1990 to aide in the implementation of the long range plan and development of the human services center. 3) SHHSC is requesting funding to support the addition of one third -time clerical staff person to assist the increased planning staff, and 4) 4% increase over 1989 funding is being requested for inflation and salary increases. The SHHSC Board is also requesting a $2,000 supplement to its 1989 budget from each of the four cities to adequately fund the position of a senior planner for the rest of 1989. Considerable discussion followed relating to the relocation of SHHSC and other human service agencies to the proposed human services center. Mr. Byrne commented that the Human Relations Commission supports bringing the agencies together for the sake of providers and recipients and recommended funding the initial expenses. Human Relations Commission Budget - Funding requests for the 1990 Budget were presented as follows: Storefront/Youth Action $38,500, Senior Community Services $5,000, Cornerstone Advocacy Service $2,700, Share -A -Home $2,000, United Battered Families Network $2,000, VEAP $1,800, West Suburban Mediation Center $800 for a total of $52,800. A request of $40500 for the Chemical Health Program was also presented which would provide for a chemical health program coordinator. Mr. Byrne responded to questions and discussion on the proposed Human Relations Commission budget request and the Chemical Health Program.' PROPOSED 1990 BUDGET REVIEWED - The Council then reviewed the proposed 1990 Budget for the various departments of the City, with discussion on the following areas: Election - Mayor Richards asked if there is some cost savings with the new voting system. Clerk Daehn responded that the voting equipment is now stored on City property which eliminated the cost for rental of storage space for the previous voting machines. Some increase in costs for general supplies and printing is anticipated but, basically, the total election budget for 1990 is the same as for 1988. Assessine - Member Kelly asked why there was a 7.9% increase. It was explained . that there are some comparable worth adjustments in the department and also, costs for data processing (LOGIS) are up. Legal and Court Services - Member Kelly asked if the 1.0% increase is reasonable considering pending and potential litigation. Manager Rosland responded that he has been working with the prosecuting attorney in an attempt to hold prosecuting services at the current level. If enforcement goes up there should be the correlating income as an offset. As to services for civil cases, that is difficult to estimate and is affected by any settlements that may be made. Public Works /Supervision - Mayor Richards asked what would happen if we did not fund the Gopher One State program. Manager Rosland explained that this is a mandated program from the State which establishes a central agency to locate buried utilities. He said there has been some talk about State funding of mandated programs but that for the present the City pays for the program. Manager Rosland said he would research how the program works and would bring back that information. Public Works /Street Maintenance - Mayor Richards raised the question of falling behind on street maintenance. Manager Rosland said that staff believes they have been able to keep up the current level of street maintenance without adding manpower by replacing equipment with better and more efficient equipment. Public Safety /Police Protection - Member Rice asked if the proposed budget for police protection would maintain the current level of se lice. Chief Swanson said that it would improve the level of service with the addition of the drug- enforcement officer. Member Kelly asked if they will still be able to handle the emergency medical calls in the southeast area of the City without an additional patrol officer in that area, and, also, what the response time is currently. Chief Swanson said that presently it is well within six minutes, that the previous standard had been four minutes but that they are not always able to hold the four minute mark consistently. She asked for information as to the County's response time and how the City's emergency medical service compares to that of the County. Mayor Richards asked what it would mean if the position of the drug enforcement officer was not funded. Chief Swanson said he felt it would take away the threat to the street level drug distributor. Recent undercover operations conducted by the Police Department have substantiated the use and trafficking of drugs in Edina as indicated by one three -month study project. -He said that presently we are not providing police service to that activity at the street dealer level. Mayor Richards asked if this is the proper level to attack this problem and who would prosecute these cases. Chief Swanson said it was his opinion that it is a cultural problem and has to be addressed by every level. As to prosecution, that would be done by the Hennepin County Attorney and /or through the federal court system on drugs. He said he did not conceive that prosecution would be a problem. Mayor Richards asked.if this would be a joint City /School effort. Chief Swanson said previous funded programs that involved the School were for prevention, education, counseling, liaison work, etc. The drug enforcement officer would be a worker that would be out there to arrest people who are involved in drugs. The School would need to be made aware that enforcement could lead into the schools. Public Safety /Inspections - Member Rice asked if the City were to be more aggressive in area of inspections and /or violations what would that entail. Building Official John Shirmang said it would probably require one -half person at first. Manager Rosland said if we were to change from basically responding to complaints to seeking out violations it would require a fulltime person. Public Safety /Public Health - Member Kelly said she would like the City to seriously consider contracting with Fairview - Southdale Hospital for at least some of the public health services now provided by Bloomington. Currently the City has little control over the contract cost for public health services because Bloomington has been the only provider to meet our specifications. She said that one of the benefits the hospital could provide the community would be public health services. Park & Recreation /Forestry - Manager Rosland explained that this account includes $5,000 for replacement of approximately 20 boulevard trees; however, more than that number'of trees are lost. He said there has been requests from some of the Country Club area residents that the City consider strengthening the tree program. He suggested that the City could either: 1) Buy the trees and have them planted and then assess the cost back to benefitted properties over five years, or 2) Increase the amount for tree replacement in the City budget. Member Kelly said there has also been some concern expressed that the diseased trees are not being taken down fast enough. Manager Rosland said that the work is being contracted out. Park Director Kojetin reported that to date 106 elm trees have been removed from boulevard property this year and 288 have been diagnosed as diseased on private properties. There have been only about a dozen requests for replacement trees out of the 106 removed from the boulevards. He said that replacement trees should probably be spaced further apart because the maples and green ash will not give the crown look as the elms did that were planted 30/40 years ago. Regarding removal, he said diseased trees are generally removed 10 days after they have been identified. Member.Paulus asked if the parks are in need of trees and also if citizens could donate trees to the City. Director Kojetin said that we have lost 56 trees from the parks as a result of girdling by deer. Over 60 trees from the park tree nursery have been planted as replacements. Manager Rosland said citizens who donated trees could take a tax deduction if Ythey did not derive a benefit therefrom. Non- Departmental - Mayor Richards noted the following: 1) Operating budget contribution to the Capital Plan Budget of $140,000 is proposed at $115,000; 2) Special assessments remain at $80,000; 3) Recycling Program is proposed at $149,885 (doubled); 4) Futures Commission is proposed at $10,000 (new program); 5) Loss Subsidy /Art Center is proposed at $5,757 (tremendous improvement). Following review of the proposed 1990 Budget, Mayor Richards said that the budget hearing would continue on Thursday, August 10, and begin with staff's response to specific questions that have been raised. The Council Members would then discuss the 1990 Budget as'proposed and attempt to reach a consensus thereon. The meeting.was adjourned at approximately 7:20 p.m. City Clerk MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL BUDGET MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL AUGUST 10, 1989 5:00 P.M. Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor Richards. HEARING CONTINUED ON 1990 BUDGET Manager Rosland responded to specific questions that had been raised by the Council at the budget meeting on August 8, 1989 as follows. Gopher One State - Gopher One State is a state mandated program which serves as a central agency to locate buried utilities. Anyone who digs mechanically or anyone who digs deeper than one foot must call Gopher One State to tell them of the location. Gopher One State then calls all agencies (utilities companies, governmental units, etc.) who have anything underground in that location. When the City receives a call from Gopher One State we go out and mark where any City utilities are buried. The City is charged $2.50 for each call from Gopher One State. If we have no utilities in the reported location we receive credit for the call. The City's monthly billing from Gopher One State averages $600/650. In addition, there is a flat fee of $50.00 for computer printouts that are received continuously. In the month of July we received 385 calls from Gopher One State. Member Kelly asked if the City could recover this cost through building permit fees. Manager Rosland said that probably could be done, however, the purpose of the program is to make sure that proposed digs are reported. 911 Response Time - Police are first response to 911 medical calls with a response time average of between 3.9 and 4.9 minutes. Paramedics are called at the same time with a response time average of 6.9 minutes as compared to 5.9 minutes prior to this year. The difference is due to a change in recording - previously the start time recorded was when the unit was dispatched. We now record the start time when the 911 call comes in to the dispatch center. Hennepin County response times to neighboring communities taken at time of dispatch are: Eden Prairie 7.5, Hopkins 6.5, Minnetonka 7.8, St. Louis Park 7.3. Manager Rosland said we are well within the standards of the County. Assessing Department 7.9% Increase - Manager Rosland commented that the increase in the budget for the Assessing Department is composed of 46.8% comparable worth, 25.3% payroll, 19.3% central services and 8.6% other. Three out of the five employees in the department received comparable worth adjustments. Central Services - Manager Rosland explained that the central services account includes expenses such as pensions, hospital and life insurance, personnel training, copier rental, phone, worker's compensation, postage and general supplies. These are then allocated to operating departments according to number of employees, usage, etc. Public Health Services - David Velde, Health Department, has been instructed to set up a meeting with the administrator of Fairview - Southdale Hospital to start working on the possibility of the hospital providing some of the public health services to the community. Fees and Charges - Manager Rosland said staff is recommending an overall increase of 5.0% in licenses /permits and fees /charges for a proposed total of $2,598,800 which ties directly into the 1990 Budget. Proposed increases for specific fees and charges will be presented, with formal approval by ordinance /resolution when the 1990 Budget is adopted. Member Paulus commented she would like to see a comparison of Edina's fees and charges with those of other cities. Mayor Richards then asked the Council Members to individually present their viewpoints on the proposed 1989 Budget, and indicate support or non - support for various programs and line items. Following that review the Council then discussed proposed budget cuts which had been suggested. After considerable debate a consensus was reached that staff be directed to make the following cuts for the proposed 1990 Budget: Police /Fire Protection Overtime $ 8,000 New Equipment (Tapes). 4,900 Capital Budget (Street Lighting) 25,000 Park & Recreation Maintenance (Trash Containers) 5,000 Human Relations Commission (Overall Reduction) 475 Human Relations Commission (Chemical Health Advisory) 4,500 South Hennepin Human Services Council (Reduction) 7,093 x74,708 The Council also voted (3 -2) not to fund the-SHHSC request for $2,000 to supplement its 1989 Budget for a senior planner for the balance of the year. Mayor Richards concluded with the comment that staff now prepare the 1990 Budget, in accordance with the direction given by the Council, for the public hearing thereon as required by the truth in taxation legislation and any further legislation as a result of the proposed special session. The meeting was adjourned at 6:35 p.m. City Clerk a o e 7P t4 Cn N'v �y • RPORP -1 • ieee REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor and Council From: John Wallin Finance Director Date: October 2, 1989 Subject: Budget Hearing Agenda Item # III. Consent 0 Information Only ❑ Mgr,. Recommends ❑ To HRA C] To Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Continuation of Budget Hearing to December 4, 1989. Info /Background: For this year only the 1989 Tax Bill changes the October 1 deadline for certifying proposed levies to mid - November. In addition, the bill changes the November 9 deadline for certifying final levies to December 28. Under the bill, the publication of the notices and the public hearings would take place between mid - November and the end of December. Fees and charges should also be approved at the December 4, 1989 Council Meeting. A memorandum from the State of Minnesota Department of Revenue is attached with more information on Truth in Taxation. ,IF STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Mail Station 3340 St. Paul, Minnesota 55146 -3340 (612) 296 -5139 FAX #(612) 297 -2166 October 6, 1989 TO: CHAIRS OF COUNTY BOARDS AND COUNTY AUDITORS; MAYORS, CITY MANAGERS, AND CITY CLERKS OF CITIES OVER 2,500 POPULATION; BOARD MEMBERS AND SUPERINTENDENTS OF SCHOOL DISTRICTS RE: FINAL INFORMATION ON TRUTH IN TAXATION FOR PAYABLE 1990 The Department of Revenue is pleased to inform you that the Truth in Taxation provisions have been finalized. The provisions are contained in the 1989 Property Tax Bill recently passed by the State Legislature in Special Session and signed into law by the Governor. The 1989 Tax Bill contains basically the same procedures for Truth in Taxation for payable 1990 that were outlined in the Commissioner of Revenue's letters mailed on June 23, July 28, and August 25. The schedule of events for Truth in Taxation for payable 1990 had to be changed because the Departments of Education and Revenue are required to recertify state aids and levy limitations under the new state property tax relief plan. The revised schedule of events is listed below: 1. October 23 Last day for the Department of Revenue to recertify aids and levy limitations. 2. October 27 Last day- for the Department of Education to recertify levy limitations. 3. November 15 Last day for a taxing authority to certify its proposed tax levy. 4. December 28 Last day for a taxing authority to certify its final tax levy. (Over) AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER V, Truth in Taxation, Payable 1990 October 6, 1989 Page 2 The procedure for scheduling public hearing dates is to be the same as previously established. The counties will select meeting dates first. School districts will select meeting dates next and cities will select after the school districts. The county auditors will coordinate the scheduling to avoid conflicting meeting dates. The information previously sent to you regarding the format of the meeting notice and other procedures remains unchanged. Taxing authorities which have already certified a proposed levy and whose levy will change as a result of provisions in the new tax law are to recertify their proposed levy. If a public hearing has already been held, the taxing authority is required to certify a new tax levy, publish a new notice, and hold another public hearing. If you have any questions about Truth in Taxation, please feel free to call Bob Lerfald at 296 -5139. Sincerely, �P Xee64-. MICHAEL P. WANDMACHER, Director Local Government Services Division r Postmarked Oct: 6, 1989 Agenda Item III. ��- .:�-- dd L2�v�J 4� 491N��r� o e �y REPORT /RECOMMENDATION �aaB To: Kenneth Rosland Agenda Item # Iy. A:. From: Craig Larsen Consent ❑ - Information Only ❑ Date: October 16, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Single Family Sub- 0 To Council divisions: Amendments to Zoning Ordinance Action ❑ Motion and new Subdivision Ordinance ❑ ReS01UtlOn -0 Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends adoption of the attached Ordinances. . Info /Background: After several months deliberation the Planning Commission has recommended approval of a new Subdivision Ordinance (No. 804) and amendments to Ordinance No. 825, the Zoning Ordinance. Minutes of Planning Commission hearings on the Ordinances are attached for your review. The Planning Commission and staff began the process by reviewing recent subdivision proposals in,the City, by reviewing the requirements of other Cities in the area, and by reviewing the existing process and requirements. The attached memorandum of March 29, 1989, discusses the findings of this review. The intent of the Ordinance is to provide a consistent approach for the review of single family subdivisions which recognizes the character of each individual neighborhood. There are three sections of Ordinance No. 804 which are key to the new process. !z Definition of Neighborhood - Page 2 The Ordinance defines neighborhood as all lots within 350 feet of the property proposed for subdivision plus all lots in the original, underlying plat. Because some original plats are extremely large, the neighborhood is limited to lots within 1000 feet. Our present Ordinance does not define neighborhood. Subdivision Requirements, Section 12, Pages 15 -18 This section deals with the information required for the submission of a preliminary plat. The first section sets forth requirements for all subdivisions. They are generally the same as the present requirements. The second section sets forth additional requirements for a single family subdivision. It requires the size and dimensions of all lots in the neighborhood (as defined above) be submitted with the application for preliminary plat. This provides for a complete and accurate comparison of the proposal with the surrounding area. Guidelines for Evaluating Subdivisions Section 14, Pages 18 -21 This is the heart of the proposed Ordinance. It is broken out in three sections. The first addresses character and symmetry, environmental impact, and the adequacy of proposed public improvements. The second section deals with the size and shape of individual lots in the proposed plat. It requires that all lots meet or exceed the median average lot area, lot width and lot depth of the defined neighborhood. It also requires a lot width to perimeter ratio of 0.1 or greater. The ratio is equal to the lot width divided by the total perimeter distance of the lot. The ratio is a means of quantifying the shape of proposed lots. Square and rectangular lots score high, unusual shapes, especially neck lots, tend to score low. The final section sets forth reasons which require the Council to deny a proposed plat. If the Council makes any one or more of the findings, the proposed plat must be denied. The remaining sections of proposed Ordinance 804 deal with the technical, administrative and legal requirements of processing subdivisions. Amendments to Ordinance No. 825 The proposed amendments incorporate the standards of the new Subdivision Ordinance into the single family section of the Zoning Ordinance. The minimum lot size for lots approved pursuant to the new Subdivision Ordinance is increased from 9,000 square feet to the median size determined at the time of subdivision. The same is true for lot width and lot depth. MINUTES EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OCTOBER 2, 1989 Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Richards. MINUTES of the HRA Meeting of September 18, 1989 were approved as submitted by motion of Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Paulus. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. ACQUISITION OF KUNZ OIL COMPANY AND LEVIS ENGINEERING COMPANY PROPERTIES CONSIDERED: RESOLUTION ADOPTED INITIATING REDEVELOPMENT PROCESS Executive Director Hughes stated that the subject for consideration is adoption of a resolution to acquire, by eminent domain if necessary, the property owned by Lewis Engineering Company and Kunz Oil Company in the Grandview Redevelopment Area. The subject property is located south of Eden Avenue and west of the Soo Line Railroad tracks. Since 1984, Lewis Engineering has acquired the Soo Line Railroad property. The property is part of the Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment District established in 1984. The District can exist for a period of 25 years for the repayment of any public debt that is incurred. The Plan was preceded by the Grandview Traffic Plan adopted early in 1984 and was prompted by a proposal for .. the redevelopment of the Biltmore Motel site. The Grandview Traffic Plan recommended a number of improvements in the Grandview Area which have been or are being completed: 1) Link Road reconstruction and signalization, 2) Closure of Vernon /Eden /Sherwood intersection, 3) Consolidation of Jerry's /Norwest Bank/Union Oil access,. 4) Vacation of Summit Avenue, and 5) Demolition of the Public Works garage and reconstruction of public parking ramp /Public Works facility. In addition, several private developments envisioned by the Plan have occurred, e.g. Jerry's shopping center and office expansion, Vernon Terrace Apartments and Summit Place Apartments. The Redevelopment Plan also included a Land Use Plan which was adopted and as related to the subject property it indicated a medium density residential re -use of the site with approximately 200 units. The southern portion of the railroad property was shown as office and showroom use. Director Hughes recalled that since adoption of the Plan, several proposals were conceptually reviewed for the subject property but were eventually dropped. In 1988 Jerry's Enterprises held options on the Lewis Engineering and Kunz Oil sites and proposed a retail office complex of approximately 160,000 square feet. The proposal also incorporated the School District property and proposed moving the school bus garage to the southern end of the Kunz Oil site. For a variety of reasons the options expired and were not renewed. During the past several months, staff has discussed redevelopment alternatives for the properties with the owners as well as several developers. Most prospective developers were interested in exclusive retail uses for the site; a couple had interest in a housing use for the site. One of the prospective developers is again Jerry's Enterprises who is working with Opus Corporation to pursue development of the property. All developers who approached staff envisioned a tax increment assistance package associated with the redevelopment, although specifics were not discussed. Director Hughes explained that the owners of the property, Lewis and Kunz, have by letters indicated that private sale of the property is not possible at this time and have advised that the HRA should consider using its right of eminent domain to pursue acquisition and redevelopment of the property. To that end a draft resolution has been prepared that would affect the action of the HRA to direct its staff and attorneys to pursue acquisition of the site for redevelopment. Staff would suggest that is such a resolution is adopted, it should be conditional upon the execution of a redevelopment agreement with a redeveloper. Further, that the HRA formally direct staff to pursue a redevelopment agreement with Jerry's Enterprises /Opus. Director Hughes pointed out that at this point the resolution does not include the School District site. Although the Board of Education has not formally considered this project, School District staff has again confirmed their interest in the concept and their willingness to consider relocation alternatives. The HRA /Council would have to take several additional actions prior to actual acquisition and development of the property including: - Approval of a redevelopment agreement - Rezoning and plan approval of the proposed project - Public hearing to amend the Tax Increment Financing Plan - Public hearing to re -sell the properties if purchased by the HRA. As to alternatives, Director Hughes said the HRA could: 1) Reject the resolution and involvement in the project and suggest that any redevelopment be accomplished on a private basis, 2) Reject the resolution but direct staff to negotiate with a prospective redeveloper; the resolution could be reconsidered later if a redevelopment contract were achieved, or 3) Adopt the resolution and then solicit Requests for Proposals (RFP) for development of the site thereby allowing formal comparison of development proposals. He explained that'this is a relatively complicated process which may require a greater commitment to redevelop the site than the HRA wishes to offer at this point. If the HRA chose to pursue the RFP option, it may want to develop some criteria for the development and elements of the financial package that proposers could relate to in making their proposals. Director Hughes concluded his presentation by noting that Robert Shattuck, representing Jerry's Enterprises, was present. Commissioner Paulus asked what kind of cost recovery the HRA would realize from buying the property from the present owners and then re- selling it to a developer. Director Hughes said it probably would be sold at a substantial reduction in cost in that the HRA would be purchasing a developed and improved property with an active tenant or business and then re- selling it essentially as vacant land for redevelopment. If the HRA were involved in the acquisition it could expect to recover its public cost from the tax increments generated from the new development on the site. Commissioner Paulus also asked if the HRA were to adopt the resolution and the redevelopment never was firmed up would the HRA end up acquiring the land. Director Hughes explained that the land would not be acquired until the HRA would take further steps. At any point in the process the HRA could elect to proceed with acquisition, proceed with condemnation, or decline to acquire. Commissioner Kelly raised the following issues of concern: 1) Whether'a soil test has been done on the land and, if not, that the owners should have that testing done to ensure that the land is environmentally sound, 2) That the School property be included in any redevelopment, 3) What the Tax Increment District is producing now, 4) Industrial appraisal of the property versus a commercial /retail appraisal, 5) How this plays into fiscal disparities, 6) That the public benefit be documented, and 7) If the HRA agrees to the condemnation it should have the option to go with another developer if this project does commence. Director Hughes responded that he is unaware of any soil test that has been made of the land. The HRA has elected throughout this district that it not contribute to the fiscal disparities distribution of the City and that none of the City's tax increment districts are contributing. However, under recent law that election can be changed. The proposed resolution is that the acquisition of the property is conditioned upon an approved redevelopment agreement but does not specify with whom. A second part of the recommendation was that staff be authorized to negotiate with one particular developer. If a draft agreement cannot be reached, or the HRA would elect to reject the agreement, the HRA could authorize staff to seek other redevelopers or rescind the resolution. Commissioner Smith asked questions concerning private sale of the property, relocations costs, development /acquisition costs, the effect of removing the property from the tax roles, and security for the development. Director Hughes said that it was his understanding that the property was currently off the market. Attorney Erickson explained that under the state laws, if the property is acquired by condemnation, there are relocation expenses that must be paid. Those are waiveable by the owner on very strict terms and are not waiveable by such persons as tenants. In this case, the Lewis Engineering property is owned by Gordon Lewis and his wife and is leased to Lewis Engineering. Staff has asked for waivers from all owners and tenants and has also told Jerry's Enterprises /Opus, and will tell any subsequent developer, that they must give us an indemnity if those waivers are, in fact, not good. To the extend the HRA ends up paying relocation benefits, they will have to pay the HRA. Regarding development and acquisition costs, Director Hughes explained that those costs would be determined in connection with the redevelopment agreement. It is estimated that acquisition costs would be approximately $2.5 million. As to the effect of removing the property from the tax roles, Director Hughes said that this property as part of the Tax Increment District is off the tax roles. If public money is spent on this project it will, in effect, lengthen the duration of the District. When the acquisition costs have been determined, it will be possible to do an analysis which will show impacts on jurisdictions and the average homeowner in Edina. Regarding security, Director Hughes said that would be part of the redevelopment agreement. A comparison would be the agreement that the HRA has with Jerry's Enterprises on the parking ramp whereby Jerry's has signed an assessment agreement which imposes a minimum valuation on the private improvements thereby generating a certain minimum tax. There are also other guarantees built in such as a shortfall agreement. Robert Balch, 4721 Wilford Way, stated that he had a definite interest in the subject property only over the last month. He said he was told by the owners of the properties as of Saturday that they were on the market for approximately $3.5 million. He asked how much the tax increment write -down would be. Director Hughes said that is not known as this time and would be part of the redevelopment agreement to be negotiated. Mr. Balch asked if the resolution were passed would that preclude the land being purchased by private individuals. Attorney Erickson replied that it would not. Mr. Balch then commented that it seemed to him that a developer is being chosen before the proposal has been heard by the Planning Commission who may not like the plan. Mayor Richards commented that the final decision rests with the HRA and that what the staff has proposed will in no way curtail the normal process. Mr. Balch said that, as a real estate broker, he would ask the HRA to set this matter aside for 30 days. He said he felt there was a large feeling in western Edina that another supermarket might be needed and would be a possibility. He indicated that one developer has a scheme for the School District bus garage property which would be proposed shortly. Commissioner Rice asked if adoption of the resolution would obligate the BRA to anything and if it would preclude the owners of the property or the HRA from negotiating from anyone else, also if there was some period of time for this to take place: Director Hughes stated that adoption of the resolution in itself would not, but that if the HRA were to adopt the second part of the recommendation it would be staff's sense to negotiate with only the named redevelopers. He suggested that this be done in a six - months timeframe. Commissioner Rice asked if the proposed developers were knowledgeable and experienced and if they understood the risks involved, taking into account the comments that have been made at this hearing, and that they understand the normal process for redevelopment. Director Hughes said he believed that they certainly are knowledgeable and understand the risks involved. Chairman Richards commented that he would support the resolution with some modifications. If the redevelopment is to happen with the proposed developers that negotiations be concluded within three months. Further, that staff be instructed to negotiate with Jerry's Enterprises /Opus with the understanding that due and proper consideration be given by the staff to any other developer who may submit a proposal for redevelopment of the subject property. Commissioner Smith said he agreed with the shorter timeframe for negotiations on a redevelopment agreement with Jerry's Enterprises /Opus, that he did not favor condemnation and would like to keep it open for other proposals. He suggested that a discussion on the issue of land use might be appropriate at this time. Chairman Richards responded that the time to consider land use is when a specific proposal is brought back for redevelopment of the property at which time all the costs and other factors would be taken into consideration. The HRA /Council will then either approve it or vote it down. Commissioner Kelly reiterated that nothing be done until a soil test has been made of the property. Attorney Erickson said that the redevelopment agreement would be a three -party document between the owners, the developers and the HRA and that a soil test could be a condition of the agreement. Commissioner Rice commented that the HRA should not assume the function of the developers which is to work these things out, take risks, make assumptions, put the numbers together, present a proposal and then convince the HRA that this is a good deal and of benefit to the public. Chairman Richards moved the following actions: 1) To adopt the resolution as follows, 2) To instruct staff to pursue and negotiate a redevelopment agreement with Jerry's Enterprises /Opus for the subject property, and 3) To direct staff to give due consideration to any written proposal that may be submitted by other developers for redevelopment of the subject property: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, it is necessary, advisable, and in the public interest that the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, acquire for redevelopment purposes, and pursuant to the redevelopment plan entitled "Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan" dated May 30, 1984, adopted by the HRA on June 18, 1984, and approved by the City Council of the City of Edina on June 18, 1984, property within the Grandview redevelopment area; and WHEREAS, in order to accomplish the purposes set out in said Plan, it is necessary that the properties described on Exhibit A attached hereto and hereby made a pat be redeveloped; and WHEREAS, the HRA has been advised that said property will not be made available for redevelopment unless it is acquired by eminent domain; and WHEREAS, by reason of the inability of any private party to purchase said property for redevelopment, it will be necessary to procure the same by the right of eminent domain. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the HRA proceed to procure the property described on Exhibit A hereto under its right of eminent domain if it is not made available for redevelopment by sale to a private party or parties; and that the attorneys for the HRA be instructed and directed to file the necessary petition therefor and to prosecute such action to a successful conclusion, or until it is abandoned, dismissed or terminated by the HRA or by the Court; and that the attorneys for the HRA, the Director and Executive Director of the HRA and the Chairman and Secretary of the HRA do all things necessary to be done in the commencement, prosecution and successful termination of such eminent domain proceeding. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that none of the foregoing actions to acquire the property described on Exhibit A hereto be started or undertaken until the HRA has signed and delivered a contract for redevelopment of said property, and the School District Property north of Eden Avenue, with a redeveloper, and on terms and conditions, acceptable to the HRA, and until the Tax Increment Financing Plan is amended in accordance with Minnesota Statute 469.175, subd.(4). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that none of the foregoing resolutions shall be effective or valid after December 31, 1989. EXHIBIT A Lot 1, Block 1, Wanner Addition, EXCEPT that part described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Lot 1; thence North along the East line of said Lot 1, a distance of 23.4 feet; thence West parallel with the South line of said Lot 1 a distance of 101 feet; thence South parallel with the East line of said Lot 1, a distance of 22.4 feet; thence West parallel with the South line of said Lot 1 to the West line of said Lot 1; thence South along the West line of said Lot 1 a distance of 1 foot to the Southwest corner of said Lot 1; thence East along the South line of said Lot 1 to the point of beginning. and Lot 1, Block 1, ^Edenmoor, Hennepin County, Minnesota", EXCEPT the South six (6) feet thereof. and That part of Government Lot 8, Section 28, Township 117 North, Range 21 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying Southerly of the South line of Eden Avenue, Westerly of the West right of way line of the Minneapolis Northfield and Southern Railway and Easterly of Block 1, Wanner Addition, EXCEPT that part described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of Lot 2, Block 1, Wanner Addition; thence North a distance of 25 feet; thence West a distance of 90 feet to the East line of Lot 1, Block 1, Wanner Addition; thence South a distance of 25 feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot 1; thence East a distance of 90 feet to the point of beginning. Also, Lot 2, Block 1, Wanner Addition, according to the map or plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for said Hennepin County, subject to an easement for roadway purposes over and across the South 25 feet of said Lot 2, and together with an easement for roadway purposes over and across the North 25 feet of Lot 3, Block 1 of said Wanner Addition; also together with an easement for road purposes over a strip of land 16 feet in width being 8'feet on each side of the following described line: Commencing at a point on the south line of Eden Prairie Road 358 feet due East from the West line of said Government Lot 8; thence South and parallel with the west line of said Government Lot 8 to a point which is 612.9 feet North of the South line of said Lot 8; thence west at right angles to east line of premises first above described. That part of Lot 1, Block 1 of said Wanner Addition described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Lot 1; thence North along the East line of said Lot 1, a distance of 23.4 feet; thence West parallel with the,South line of said Lot 1 a distance of 101 feet; thence South parallel with the East line of said Lot 1, a distance of 22.4 feet; thence West parallel with the South line of said Lot 1 to the West line of said Lot 1; thence South along the West line of said Lot 1 a distance of 1 foot to the Southwest corner of said Lot 1; thence East along the South line of said Lot 1 to the point of beginning. That part of Government Lot 8, Section 28, Township 117 North, Range 21 West, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point located on a line drawn between the following described points; Point 1 located on a line parallel with and distant 221.8 feet East of the West line of said Government Lot 8, which point is distant South 259.4 feet from the Intersection of the center line of Eden Prairie Road and said line; and Point 2 located on the South line of said Government Lot 8, 246.8 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Government Lot 8; said point of beginning being 647.9 feet from the South line of said Government Lot 8; thence Northerly along said drawn line 25 feet; thence Easterly and at right angles a distance of 90 feet; thence Southerly and parallel with said drawn line 25 feet; thence Westerly and at right angles to point of beginning. ATTEST: Executive Director Chairman Motion for the above actions was seconded by Commissioner Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. . There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, motion of Commissioner Kelly was seconded by Commissioner Rice for adjournment. Motion carried unanimously. Executive Director .� 29538 ORDINANCE NO. 804 AN ORDINANCE REGULATING PLATS AND SUBDIVISIONS, PRESCRIBING THE PROCEDURE FOR APPROVAL OF PLATS AND SUBDIVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR VARIANCES, REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 801, AND PRESCRIBING A PENALTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Purpose and Objectives. The purpose and objectives of this ordinance are to provide for the orderly, economic and safe development of land and urban services and facilities, to facilitate adequate provision for transportation, water, sewage, storm drainage, schools, parks, playgrounds and other public services and facilities; to promote the public health, safety and general welfare by establishing physical standards, design requirements and procedures for plats and subdivisions of land; to allow flexibility in design of plats and subdivisions; to develop a consistency with and to help implement the zoning, building and other applicable ordinances and codes of the City; to support and further the City's comprehensive plan by establishing uniform procedures and regulations for plats and subdivisions to preserve and enhance the value and viable economic use of property; and to. protect and further, and not frustrate, legitimate investment backed expectations of property owners. Sec. 2. Definitions; Construction Rules; Severability. (a) Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, as used herein, shall have the following meanings: Applicant: All persons, whether one or more, who request approval by the City of a plat, subdivision or lot division, pursuant to this ordinance. Citv: The City of Edina,.Minnesota. Commission: The Community Development and Planning Commission of the City. Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan of the City adopted by the City in 1980, pursuant to applicable Minnesota Statutes, as now or hereafter amended or modified, and including any similar plan or plans as may supersede or be substituted for said Comprehensive Plan. Said Comprehensive Plan is incorporated into this ordinance by this reference thereto as completely as if fully set out herein. -1- Council: The City Council of the City. Engineer: The Director of Public Works and Engineering for the City. Median: The value (being, in this ordinance, lot area, lot depth or lot width, as the case may be) in an ordered set of such values below which and above which there is an equal number of such values, or which is the arithemetic mean of the two middle values if there is no one such middle value. Neighborhood: All property wholly or partially within 350 feet of the perimeter of the proposed plat or subdivision; provided, however, if the proposed plat or subdivision is a replat, the neighborhood shall be (i) all property wholly or partially within 350 feet of the perimeter of the proposed plat or subdivision, and (ii) all property within the original plat, and including any replats of the original plat then of record or finally approved by the Council pursuant to this ordinance, and which also is within 1,000 feet of the perimeter of the proposed plat or subdivision. If the neighborhood encompasses only a part of a parcel, tract or lot, then the whole of that parcel, tract or lot shall be deemed to be within the neighborhood. Of Record: Recorded in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, or filed in the Office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota, whichever is the appropriate office to give constructive notice of the document of record. Outlot: An area, parcel, tract or lot of land shown on a plat or subdivision as an outlot. Parcel, Tract or Lot: The definitions in the Zoning ordinance for parcel, tract and lot are incorporated herein by reference. Planner: The Planner of the City. Plat: The map of one or more subdivisions prepared for filing of record pursuant to, and containing all elements and requirements in, Chapter 505 of Minnesota Statutes, and containing all of the elements and requirements for a subdivision set forth in this ordinance, to the extent such requirements and elements were not waived pursuant to such statute or ordinance, or containing all of the elements and requirements imposed by, and not waived pursuant to, the statutes and ordinances which were applicable when such map was prepared for filing of record. Replat: A subdivision of an area of land, or parcel, tract or lot then wholly or partially within a plat of record, or a plat then having received final approval by the Council pursuant to this ordinance. -2- Subdivision: The separation of an area of land, of a parcel, tract or lot into two or more parcels, tracts or lots, or long -term leasehold interests where the creation of the leasehold interests necessitates the creation of streets, roads or alleys, for residential, commercial, industrial or other use, or any combination thereof, except those separations: (1) where all the resulting parcels, tracts, lots or interests will be 20 acres or larger in size and 500 feet in width for residential uses and 5 acres or larger in size for commercial and industrial uses; (2) creating cemetery lots; or (3) resulting from court orders, or the adjustment of a lot line by the relocation of a common boundary. For purposes of this ordinance, a subdivision shall include Registered Land Surveys and Auditor's Subdivisions. Zoning Ordinance: Ordinance No. 825 of the City, and all amendments, modifications and supplements thereto and thereof now or hereafter made, and all ordinances hereafter adopted by the Council as successors to said Ordinance No. 825. Said Ordinance No. 825 is incorporated into this ordinance by this reference thereto as completely as if fully set out herein. (b) Construction Rules. The rules of construction set out in Section 3.A of the Zoning Ordinance are incorporated herein by reference. (c) Severability. The provisions of Section 3.0 of the Zoning Ordinance are incorporated herein by reference. Sec. 3. Plat Required. (a) Every subdivision, except as provided in Sec. 4 hereof, shall be platted in full compliance with Chapter 505, Minnesota Statutes, this ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. (b) Any land transferred from one zoning district to another zoning district, excluding, however, transfers to or from the Heritage Preservation Overlay District or the Flood Plain Overlay District, as defined in the Zoning Ordinance, shall be platted in full compliance with Chapter 505, Minnesota Statutes, this ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan, in connection with, at the time of, and as a condition to, such transfer. -3- W The provisions of this ordinance shall apply also to parcels taken from a parcel, tract or lot then existing of record by use of a metes and bounds description, and such subdivisions shall be platted in full compliance with Chapter 505, Minnesota Statutes, this ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. Sec. 4. Plat Not Required. (a) Double Dwelling Units. No plat shall be required for subdivisions of lots in Double Dwelling Unit Districts pursuant to Sec. 7(a) of this ordinance, but only a lot division pursuant to paragraph (b) of this Sec. 4 shall be required. (b) Lot Divisions. No plat shall be required for any lot division which adjusts or relocates a common lot line separating two lots and which does not create a new undeveloped parcel, tract or lot that complies, alone or in combination with one or more other parcels, tracts or lots, with the applicable minimum lot area and other requirements of this ordinance and the Zoning Ordinance. However, before any such lot division shall be made or any conveyance resulting therefrom is placed of record, the Council shall adopt a resolution approving the same, and the procedure therefor shall be the same as for preliminary plat approval as set out in Sec. 10 of this ordinance, except that (i) notice of the hearing before the Council need not be published as to lot divisions made pursuant to this paragraph (b) (but shall be made for subdivisions pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section), (ii) no sign need be erected, and (iii) only a survey prepared and signed by a Minnesota registered land surveyor showing the proposed lot division need be filed with the Planner together with the required fee and such additional information that, in the opinion of the Planner, is necessary for evaluation of the lot division and determination that it is consistent with the requirements of this ordinance. Sec. 5. Variances. The Council may waive compliance with any provisions of this ordinance by adoption of a resolution specifying which provisions have been waived in any case where (i) compliance will involve an unnecessary hardship and where noncompliance does not interfere with the purposes of this ordinance, or (ii) an improved plat can be achieved by variances from the requirements of this ordinance. Sec. 6. Denial of Permits. No building permit or other permit for the development or improvement of land shall be issued for construction of a building on, or the development or improvement of, any parcel, tract or lot: (a) conveyed in violation of the provisions of Chapter 462, Minnesota Statutes; -4- (b) in any plat or subdivision hereafter made not complying with the requirements of this ordinance and approved by the Council pursuant to this ordinance; (c) in any plat hereafter made which has not been filed and a certified copy thereof delivered to the Planner as required by Sec. 10(f) hereof; or (d) which is an outlot. Sec. 7. Outlots. -It is the policy of the City to allow outlots on. plats and subdivisions presented to the City for approval pursuant to this ordinance, but only for the purpose of simplifying the descriptions of parcels of land (i) that would otherwise be excepted from the platted area, or (ii) that are to be conveyed or dedicated to the City or other public body. Therefore, any outlots shown on a plat or subdivision approved by the Council shall not be, nor be deemed to be, lots or parcels as defined in the Zoning Ordinance, nor shall any such outlots be developed by the erection or placing of improvements thereon, except, however, for improvements erected or placed by the City or other public body upon outlots conveyed or dedicated to it, unless first replatted into lots and blocks pursuant to this ordinance and the applicable provisions of state law. Sec. 8. Double Dwelling Unit District (R -2) and Townhouse Plats. (a) Double Dwelling Units. Any lot in the Double Dwelling Unit District as then determined by the Zoning Ordinance may be subdivided into two lots notwithstanding the regulations stated in the Zoning Ordinance which apply to the Single Dwelling Unit District. Provided, that as a condition to the approval of such subdivision the owner or owners of the lot to be subdivided shall make a separate and independent connection of each dwelling unit on the lot to be subdivided with the public sanitary sewer and water mains, or obtain a waiver from the Council of such connection, and pay the connection charges therefor, if any, all as required by City Ordinance Nos. 431, 1101 and 1111, and after such conditions are met and complied with, the City Clerk shall give a certified copy of the Council resolution approving such subdivision. (b) Townhouse Plats. As conditions to the approval of any townhouse plat, as defined in the Zoning Ordinance, of previously built and then existing townhouses, as defined in the Zoning Ordinance, each townhouse shall be separately and independently connected to the sanitary sewer and water mains, or the requirement for such connections shall be waived, and the connection charges therefor, if any, shall be paid, all as required by Ordinance Nos. 431, 1101, and 1111, and after such conditions are met and complied with, the City Clerk shall give a certified copy of the Council resolution approving such plat or subdivision. -5- Sec. 9. Fees; Charges. (a) All plats and subdivisions, and all lot divisions pursuant to Sec. 4(b)' hereof, presented for approval by the Commission and Council shall be filed with the City Planning Department and shall be accompanied by a filing fee as then prescribed by Ordinance No. 171 of the City for services to be rendered by City employees in processing the proposed plat. Said fee shall not be refunded for any reason including, without limitation, rejection of the plat, subdivision or lot division by the Council, or abandonment or withdrawal of the proposed plat, subdivision or lot division by the proponent. The City shall have no duty to process or act on any plat, subdivision or lot division unless and until the applicable fee has been paid to the City. (b) Each person, by filing or submitting an application for approval by the City of a proposed plat, subdivision or lot division, shall have agreed to pay all administrative expenses and attorneys' fees, with interest and costs as herein provided, incurred by the City in connection with or as a result of reviewing and acting on such application. If more than one person signs an application, all such signers shall be jointly and severally liable for such expenses and fees, with interest and costs as herein provided. The expenses and fees to be paid to the City pursuant to this paragraph shall be payable upon demand made by the City, and if not paid within 5 days after such demand is made, shall bear interest from the date of demand until paid at a rate equal "to the lesser of the highest interest rate allowed by law or two percentage points in excess of the reference rate. Said applicants shall also pay all costs, including attorneys' fees, incurred by the City in collecting such expenses, fees and interest, with interest on such costs of collection from the dates incurred until paid, at the same interest rate as is payable on such expenses and fees. For purposes hereof, reference rate shall mean the rate publicly announced from time to time by First Edina National Bank, or any successor thereto, as its reference rate, and if such bank, or its successor, ceases publicly announcing its reference rate, reference rate shall mean the interest rate charged from time to time by such bank, or its successor on 90 -day , unsecured business loans to its most creditworthy customers. Sec. 10. Review and Approval Process. (a) Applications. (1) All applications for plat, subdivision and lot division approval shall be filed with the Planner on forms prescribed by the Planner, and shall be signed by the applicant and accompanied by the required fee, the proposed plat or subdivision complying with the criteria and -6- requirements for a preliminary plat or subdivision set out in Sec. 12 of this ordinance, the information from utility companies pursuant to subparagraph (3) of this paragraph (a), and such other information as is required by this ordinance or any other ordinance of the City, or as is necessary, in the opinion of the Planner, for evaluation of the application and determining consistency and compliance with the requirements of this ordinance and other applicable ordinances of the City. The application shall not be complete until all information and documents required by this. paragraph have been filed with and delivered to the Planner. (2) A new application shall be required: (i) if the final plat is not submitted for approval by the Council by the first anniversary date of the Council resolution granting preliminary approval thereof; or (ii) if the final plat is not filed for record, and a certified copy thereof filed with the Planner as required by paragraph (f) of this section, by the first anniversary date of the Council resolution granting final approval thereof. (3) There shall be delivered with each application a written instrument from each utility company showing that arrangements acceptable to the Planner have been made with the utility company for the installation of utilities in the manner required by this ordinance and other applicable City ordinances. (b) Hearing and Decision by Commission - Preliminary Ayproval. (1) Upon receipt by the Planner of the application and all other documents and information required pursuant to Sec. 10(a)(1) hereof, the Planner shall review the application and prepare his /her report therefor and forward the report to the Commission. (2) The persons requesting approval of a plat or subdivision of land shall erect, or cause to be erected, a sign or signs as required by Section 4.B.2 of the Zoning Ordinance, except that the information contained thereon shall be as follows: -7- "This property proposed for subdivision. "(Names of Applicants) "(Telephones of Applicants) "For information contact Edina Planning Department, Phone No. 927 - 8861." Such plat or subdivision shall -not be deemed presented to the City, and need not be reviewed or acted upon by the Commission or Council until such sign has, or signs have, been erected for at least 10 calendar days preceding the first hearing by the Commission. The sign or signs at all times shall be kept in good repair and shall be maintained in place until a final decision on the application has been made by the Council, and shall be removed by the applicant 5 days after such final decision. The failure of any such person to fully comply with the provisions of this paragraph relating to such sign or signs shall not prevent the Commission and the Council from acting on such request nor invalidate any approvals granted by the Council. If such signs are not kept in good repair or removed as herein required, then such signs shall be deemed a nuisance and may be abated by the City by proceedings under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and the cost of abatement, including administrative expenses, may be levied as a special assessment against the property upon which the sign is located, or the applicant may be prosecuted for violation of this ordinance, and if convicted shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to penalties pursuant to Ordinance No. 175. If there is more than one applicant, they shall be jointly and severally liable hereunder. (3) Upon receipt of the report of the Planner, and determination by the Planner that the required sign or signs have been erected at least 10 days, the Commission shall conduct a hearing. After hearing the oral and written views of all persons, the Commission shall make its recommendations at the same or at a specified future meeting thereof. In making its recommendation, the Commission shall be guided by and subject to the provisions of Sec. 14 of this ordinance. Also, if the provisions of paragraph (b) of Sec. 11 hereof apply, the Commission shall recommend the dedication or easement option as provided in said paragraph. (c) Public Hearing By Council - Preliminary Approval. (1) Upon request of the Planner or applicant, and after the Commission has examined and considered the -8- proposed plat, subdivision or lot division (and even if the Commission has failed to make a recommendation to the Council), the Council shall set a date for hearing thereon, which shall be not later than 60 days after the meeting at which the hearing date is set. A notice of the date, time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published once in the official newspaper at least 10 days before the date of hearing; provided, however, that no published notice need be made for lot divisions pursuant to Sec. 4(b) hereof. After hearing the oral or written views of all interested persons, the Council shall make its decision at the same meeting or at a specified future meeting thereof. In making its decision, the Council shall be guided by and subject to the provisions of Sec. 14 of this ordinance. Also, if the provisions of paragraph (b) Hof Sec. 11 hereof apply, the Council shall select its option as provided in said paragraph. The Council may by resolution: (i) grant preliminary, approval, with or without modification, and without conditions, or with such conditions reasonably related to the purpose and objectives of this ordinance as the Council may deem necessary or desirable; or (ii) grant preliminary and final approval at the same time, with or without modification, and without conditions, or with such conditions reasonably related to the purpose and objectives of this ordinance as the Council may deem necessary or desirable; or (iii) refer the plat subdivision or lot division to the Commission or other appropriate City commissions, officers or departments for further investigation and report to the Council at a specified future meeting thereof; or (iv) reject the plat, subdivision or lot division. (2) The Council shall preliminarily approve or disapprove of the proposed plat or subdivision within 120 days of the receipt by the Planner of an application completed in compliance with this Section unless applicant agrees to an extension of the review period. (d) Responsibility for Improvements; Subdivision Financing. (1) When preliminary approval has been given to a plat or subdivision, the applicant shall enter into a Developer's Agreement (herein called the "Agreement ") with -9- the City, on terms and conditions determined by the City, and shall cause all street, water and sewer improvements required by the Planner or Engineer, or by the resolution granting preliminary approval, to be completed, pursuant to the Agreement and to the City's then standards and specifications for such improvements. Such Agreement (A) as to improvements to be installed by the applicant shall obligate the applicant to to install and complete all such improvements, at applicant's own expense and under the supervision and inspection of the Engineer, and shall obligate the applicant to pay to the City a fee in compensation for such services in an amount equal to 6.5% of the total construction cost of all such improvements within 30 days after receipt of a statement therefor, (B) as to improvements petitioned for by the applicant to be installed by the City, which City installations shall be done only in plats then situated within the Single Dwelling Unit District, the Double Dwelling Unit District and the Planned Residence District, as determined by the Zoning Ordinance, shall obligate the City to provide engineering services and construct the improvements and obligate the applicant to pay to the City the cost of such services and construction, through payment of special assessments, which shall be payable in not more than 3 annual installments, and (C) as to improvements petitioned for by the applicant to be installed and assessed in accordance with the regular policies of the City, shall provide for installation if ordered by the Council and assessment in accordance with the then policies of the City; provided, however, that the City shall not be obligated to enter into such agreement (i) if the improvements required by Planner or Engineer or by such resolution are not allocated among the methods at (A), (B) and (C) above in a manner satisfactory to the Engineer, or (ii) if the applicant as to the improvements at (A) and (B) above does not give one or more of a bond, cash in escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit, all as may be required by the Planner or Engineer, or (iii) as to any improvements, if the Council determines that the City must borrow money to pay its costs of construction under such Agreement and such borrowing will jeopardize the City's credit rating. The Agreement shall also provide, as to improvements at (B) above, that if the applicant transfers any lot or parcel in the platted or subdivided area while special assessments then levied or to be levied for the improvements made pursuant to said Agreement remain unpaid, they will be paid or prepaid in full at the time of such transfer to the City Treasurer or the County Treasurer. (2) Any bond required by the City shall be given by the applicant with a corporate surety authorized to do business in Minnesota and approved by the City as surety -10- thereon, and, as to improvements referred to at (A) above, shall be a performance and payment bond in at least the full amount of- all contracts for the installation of such improvements, and as to improvements referred to at (B) above, shall be in the full amount of all costs of making the improvements specified in the Agreement not paid in cash by the applicant before or at the time of entering into the Agreement and shall be given for the securing to the City of the payment of the special assessments. (3) Any cash deposit required by the -City shall be deposited by the applicant, in escrow, in a national or state bank having an office in the City, in the full amount of the unpaid improvement costs, together with a written agreement signed by the applicant and the bank whereby the funds in escrow will be paid to the City from time to time solely upon the written demand of the City, to the extent of any default by the applicant in the Agreement then alleged by the City. (4) Any letter of credit required by the City shall be from a national or state bank approved by the City, shall be unconditional and irrevocable, shall be for the full amount of the unpaid improvement costs, and shall provide that funds will be paid to the City solely upon written demand from time to time of the City to the extent of, any default by the applicant in the Agreement 'then alleged by the City. (5) If there is more than one applicant, all thereof shall join in the Agreement, and shall be jointly and severally obligated to perform the obligations of applicant under the Agreement. (e) Final Approval. (1) When a plat or subdivision has been given preliminary approval, the Planner shall submit a supplementary report to the Council recommending final approval upon receipt by the Planner of the following: (i) a written request from the applicant for final approval; (ii) evidence and documents satisfactory to the Planner meeting and complying with the conditions and modifications imposed by the Council at the time of granting preliminary approval; -11- (iii) the final plat meeting the requirements of this ordinance, including Sec. 13 hereof; (iv) the Agreement, fully executed by the applicant and the City, and the security; all as required by paragraph (d) of this section; (v) a letter or .other signed document from each utility company agreeing to comply with Sec. 15 of this ordinance; and (vi) evidence acceptable to the Planner evidencing ownership of, and encumbrances on, the property proposed to be platted or subdivided, including, without limitation, a written opinion from the applicant's counsel addressed to the City, opining that all documents executed and delivered by the applicant to the City have been duly executed and delivered, have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate, partnership or other entity action, are binding on the signing parties and enforceable in accordance with their terms, and containing such additional statements as the Planner may request. Provided, however, if any one or more of the foregoing items is not received by the Planner, the Planner may yet submit his /her supplemental report to the Council, and -the Council may condition its final approval upon the receipt by the Planner of those items not then so received, as well as other matters reasonably related to the purpose and objectives of this ordinance. (2) Upon receipt of the supplementary report of the Planner, the Council shall act thereon, which action shall be by resolution. Such resolution shall be passed within 60 days of receipt of such supplemental report of the Planner. Final approval may be conditioned as provided in (1) of this paragraph (e), and may also be conditioned upon receipt of the land dedication, cash contribution or security required pursuant to Sec. 11 hereof. If the Council imposes conditions in any grant of final approval, then the officers of the City shall not sign such plat, nor shall the City Clerk issue any certified copy of the resolution of the Council giving such final approval, until such conditions are met and complied with. The City Clerk is authorized, once such conditions have been met and complied with, to issue a certified copy of the resolution of the Council giving such final approval, without reference to such conditions. -12- (f) Filing of Plat: Certified Cony of Avvroving Resolution. (1) The applicant shall file for record the final plat, at applicant's expense, as soon as possible after receipt by applicant of a certified copy of the Council resolution giving final approval of the plat. Said plat shall not be filed for record, nor accepted for record, unless said certified copy of the Council resolution giving such final approval accompanies such plat when presented for filing of record. A certified copy of such filed plat with the recording data thereon shall be filed with the Planner. (2) If the plat is not filed for record and a certified copy thereof filed with the Planner by the first anniversary date of the Council resolution giving such final approval (even if such final approval is conditional on performance of further acts by applicant or others), the plat or subdivision shall be deemed abandoned and withdrawn and of no effect, and a new application shall be filed and the plat or subdivision again submitted for review and action pursuant to this ordinance. (3) If the approved plat is of land contiguous to another municipality, the City Clerk shall also file a copy of such resolution with the governing body of such municipality. (4) The City Clerk shall not give a certified copy of the resolution approving the plat or subdivision for a double dwelling unit or a townhouse development until the requirements of Sec. 8 of this ordinance have been fulfilled. Sec. 11. Land Dedication or Cash Contribution. (a) A reasonable portion of any proposed plat or subdivision shall be dedicated to the City for public use for streets, roads, sewer lines, electric lines, gas lines, water lines and facilities, storm water drainage and holding areas or ponds and similar utilities and improvements.: The Planner and Engineer shall recommend to the.Council what portion is reasonable, the location thereof, the need therefor and the use thereof. (b) Where any plat or subdivision adjoins a natural -lake, pond or stream, including streams which flow only intermittently, a strip of land running along all sides thereof which are contiguous to such lake, pond or stream, which strip shall extend from a line 100 feet upland from the lake or pond, as measured from the high water mark, and 100 feet from the centerline of the stream, shall be either -13- (i) dedicated to the City for public use, or *(ii) subjected to a perpetual easement in favor of the City over and in said land and the bed and water body of such lake, pond or stream for the purpose of protecting the hydraulic efficiency and the natural character and beauty of such lake, pond or stream. The Commission shall determine which of these options is more appropriate and shall recommend to the Council one of said options. In either case, there shall also then be granted to the City the right of ingress to and egress from the said strip of land with workmen, equipment and material. Also, where the easement is determined to be in the best interest of the City, said easement shall also provide that the owners of the areas as to which such easement is granted shall not make, do or place any fill, grading,, improvement or development of any kind on or to such easement area, or raise the level of the easement area in any way, but all such right to fill, grade, improve and develop, and to raise the level of the easement area, shall be granted by said easement to the City. (c) In addition to the dedication to be made pursuant to paragraphs (a) and (b) in this section, and if the Council reasonably determines that it will need to acquire a portion of the land within the plat or subdivision for the purposes stated in this paragraph (c) as a result of approval of the plat or subdivision, then, as to such plat or subdivision, a reasonable portion of the land therein shall be dedicated to the public or preserved for conservation purposes or for public use as parks, playgrounds, trails, wetlands or open space, provided that, at the option of the City, the owner or owners shall contribute to the City an amount of cash equal to the fair market value of the land otherwise required to be so dedicated or preserved, or dedicate and preserve a part of such land and contribute the balance of such land value in cash. Land then set aside and dedicated for public recreational purposes pursuant to Section 13 (Planned Residential District) of the Zoning Ordinance may be considered as set aside and dedicated under this ordinance to the extent required hereunder in connection with such plat or subdivision, but then only to the extent that such land is in excess of the open space then required by the Zoning Ordinance. Any money so paid to the City shall be placed in a special fund and used only for the acquisition or development of land for conservation purposes, parks, playgrounds, trails, wetlands, and open space. For purposes of this ordinance, "fair market value of the land" is defined as the fair market value of the land within such plat or subdivision as of the date the plat or subdivision is granted final approval by the Council, as determined by the City Assessor. (1) It is the policy of the City, as a general rule, to require dedication of land in the following instances: (i) if the property to be dedicated is adjacent to an existing public park or playground -14- and the additional property will beneficially expand the park or playground; (ii) if the property to be dedicated is six acres or more in size, or is expected to be combined with future acquisitions by the City so that a public park with a minimum of six acres will result; (iii) if the property to be dedicated abuts or adjoins a natural lake, pond or stream, or a wetland then protected by then applicable state or federal laws or statutes; (iv) if the property to be dedicated is necessary or desirable for a storm water holding or ponding area, or is an area which the City intends to have dredged or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds; (v) if the property to be dedicated is a place of significant natural, scenic or historic value. Sec. 12. Requirements for Preliminary Plat or Subdivision. (a) General. The applicant shall file with the application required by Sec. 10 hereof the following information which is required for all proposed plats and subdivisions, and which shall be shown on the proposed plat or subdivision or other accompanying document: (1) The proposed name of the proposed plat or subdivision. (2) The name, owner, each agent surveyor and the subdivision. (3) A graphic north point and the plat or subdivision. address and telephone number of each of any owner, each applicant, the designer of the proposed plat or scale (no smaller than 1" = 50'), the date of preparation of the proposed (4) The plat or subdivision shall show the perimeter property lines of the plat or subdivision, and the perimeter lines of each lot, with bearings and distances. (5) The lot and block numbers. -15- (6) The lot width (as defined by the Zoning Ordinance), lot depth (as defined by the Zoning Ordinance) and square footage of each lot. (7) Site data, including total area, area in lots, area in streets and other public uses, and percentages for each, and divided into existing and proposed. (8) The legal description of the tract to be platted, together with its PIN number(s). (9) The existing zoning classification(s) of the property and adjacent property. (10) Location and size of any proposed outlots, and a conceptual plan (graphically and in writing) for future development thereof. (11) All existing public roads and rights of way serving the property, including the grade, width, legally established centerline elevation, and the location and elevation of sidewalks. (12) All proposed public roads and rights of way. (13) Existing easement locations, widths and purposes, and showing invert elevation of sewers. (14) Proposed easement locations, widths and purposes; (15) Location of existing and proposed utilities, including distance to nearest utilities not on or adjoining the property, and showing the invert elevation of sewers. (16) Existing elevations and contours at 2 foot intervals and a preliminary grading plan showing resulting elevations and contours at 2 foot intervals. (17) Minimum front, rear and side setbacks for the proposed improvements on the proposed lots. (18) Location of all wetlands, streams, ponds or lakes within or flowing through the property proposed to be platted or subdivided with normal high water and 100 year flood elevations. (19) Location of all proposed parks, drainage facilities and areas proposed to be dedicated for public use. -16- (20) Ground elevation of land within 100 feet of the perimeter property lines of the area proposed to be platted or subdivided, showing contour lines at 2 foot intervals. (21) If the land proposed to be platted or subdivided is within the Flood Plain as determined by the Zoning Ordinance, the location and elevation of the Flood Plan shall be shown. (22) The mean grade of the front and rear lines of each proposed lot. (23) The land area, by total square footage and by percentage of all land in the proposed plat or subdivision, to be disturbed in the subdivision by public and private improvements, and the location of such disturbed areas. (24) The location and elevation of all existing improvements on the land in the proposed plat or subdivision and a statement as to whether they will remain or be removed. (25) A graphic illustrating the then existing topography for all lots in the proposed plat or subdivision and showing the location of all areas with slopes of greater than 18 %, and the percentage of such areas relative to the total area in the proposed plat or subdivision, and the percentage of each lot having slopes of 18% or greater. (26) The number of overstory trees then existing on the property proposed to be disturbed by public or private improvements, and their location, having a diameter of 6 inches or more as to deciduous trees, and having a height of 6 feet or more as to coniferous trees. (b) Additional Requirements for Platting or Subdivision of Property in the Single Dwelling Unit District. In addition to the requirements at subparagraph (a) of this section, the applicant for a proposed plat or subdivision of land wholly or partially within the Single Dwelling Unit District as then determined by the Zoning Ordinance shall also deliver to the Planner the following information: (1) A complete list of all properties, and the owners thereof, within Single Dwelling Unit Districts which are wholly or partially within the neighborhood of the property proposed to be platted or subdivided. The list of properties and owners shall be from a source acceptable to the Planner. -17- (2) Relative to the properties included in (1) above in this subparagraph: (i) the square footage for each lot in such properties; (ii) the mean average and median lot area for each such lot; (iii) the mean average and median lot width, as defined by the Zoning Ordinance, for each such lot; and (iv) the mean average and median lot depth, as defined by the Zoning Ordinance, for each such lot. (3) The location of the proposed building pad for each lot in the proposed plat or subdivision. Sec'. 13. Requirements for Final Plat or Subdivision. If the Council grants preliminary approval of a proposed plat or subdivision, the applicant shall prepare and deliver to the Planner: (1) two mylar or linen reproducible tracings and two mounted copies of the proposed plat in its final form, complying with the requirements of this ordinance, the preliminary approval granted by the Council, and Chapter 505 of Minnesota Statutes; and (2) evidence satisfactory to the Planner that the final plat has been reviewed and approved by the Hennepin County Surveyor's office. Sec. 14. Guidelines and Criteria for Evaluating Plats and Subdivision; Review of Requirements. (a) The Commission in reviewing proposed plats and subdivisions and in determining its recommendation to the Council, and the Council in determining whether to approve or disapprove of any plat or subdivision, may consider, among other matters, the following: (1) The impact of the proposed plat or subdivision, and proposed development thereof, on the character and symmetry of the neighborhood as evidenced and indicated by, but not limited to, the following matters: (i) The suitability of the size and shape of the lots in the proposed plat or subdivision relative to the size and shape of lots in the neighborhood; and (ii) The compatibility of the size, shape, location and arrangement of the lots. in the -18- proposed plat or subdivision with the proposed density and intended use of the site and the density and use of lots in the neighborhood. (2) The impact of the proposed plat or subdivision, and proposed development thereof, on the environment, including but not limited to, topography, steep slopes, vegetation, naturally occurring lakes, ponds and streams, susceptibility of the site to erosion and sedimentation, susceptibility of the site to flooding and water storage needs on and from the site. (3) The consistency of the proposed plat or subdivision, and proposed development thereof, and compliance by the proposed plat or subdivision, and the proposed development, with the policies, objectives and goals of the Comprehensive Plan. (4) The compliance of the proposed plat or subdivision, and the proposed development thereof, with the policies, objectives-, goals and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance including, without limitation, the lot size provisions and the Flood Plain Overlay District provisions. of the Zoning Ordinance. (5) The impact of the proposed plat or subdivision, and proposed development thereof, on the health, safety and general welfare of the public. (6) The relationship of the design of the site, or the improvements proposed therefor, and the conflict of such design or improvements, with any easements of record or on the ground. (7) The relationship of lots in the proposed plat or subdivision. to existing streets and the adequacy and safety of ingress to and egress from such lots from and to existing streets. (8) The adequacy of streets in the proposed plat or subdivision, and the conformity thereof with existing and planned streets and highways in surrounding areas. (9) The suitability of street grades in relation to the grades of lots and existing or future extension of the City's water and storm and sanitary sewer systems. (10) The adequacy and availability of access by police, fire, ambulance and other life safety vehicles to all proposed improvements to be developed on the proposed plat or subdivision. -19- (11) Whether the physical characteristics of the property, including, without limitation, topography, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion or siltation, susceptibility to flooding, use as a natural recovery and ponding area for storm water, and potential disturbance of slopes with a grade of 18% or more, are such that the property is not suitable for the type of development or use proposed. (12) Whether development within the proposed plat or subdivision will cause the disturbance of more than 25% of the total area in such plat or subdivision containing slopes exceeding 18 %. (13) Whether the proposed plat or subdivision, or the improvements proposed to be placed thereon, are likely to cause substantial environmental damage. (b) If the proposed plat is wholly or partially within the Single Dwelling Unit District, then the minimum lot area, lot width, lot depth and lot width to perimeter ratio shall be as follows: (1) If the median lot area of lots in the neighborhood is greater than 9,000 square feet, then the minimum lot area of any lot in the proposed plat or subdivision shall not be less than the median lot area of lots in the neighborhood. (2) If the median lot width, as defined by the Zoning Ordinance, of lots in the neighborhood is greater than 75 feet, then the minimum lot width, as defined by the Zoning Ordinance, of any lot in the proposed plat or subdivision shall not be less than the median lot width of lots in the neighborhood. (3) If the median lot depth, as defined by the Zoning Ordinance, of lots in the neighborhood is greater than 120 feet, then the minimum lot depth, as defined by the Zoning Ordinance, of any lot in the proposed plat or subdivision shall not be less than the. median lot depth of lots in the neighborhood. (4) The lot width to perimeter ratio (as defined in the Zoning Ordinance) for any lot in the proposed plat or subdivision shall not be less than 0.1. (c) The Commission shall recommend denial of any proposed plat or subdivision, and the Council shall deny, and not approve any proposed plat or subdivision, if it makes any of the following findings: -20- (1) That the proposed plat or subdivision does not comply with the policies, objectives or goals of the Comprehensive Plan. (2) That the proposed plat or .subdivision does not comply with the policies, objectives, goals or requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, including, without limitation, the lot 'size and dimension requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, and the Flood Plain Overlay District and Heritage Preservation Overlay District of the Zoning Ordinance, as varied by variances therefrom, if any, granted pursuant to the Zoning Ordinance. (3) That the design of the proposed plat or subdivision, or the design or type of improvements proposed to be placed thereon, may be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public. (4) That the proposed plat or subdivision does not conform to, and comply with the requirements of,-applicable state law. (5) That the proposed plat or subdivision does not comply with the policies, objectives, goals or requirements of this ordinance, as varied by variances therefrom, if any, granted pursuant to this ordinance. Sec. 15. Utilities. (a) Underground Installation of Utilities. All new utilities (excluding main line electric feeders and high voltage transmission lines) constructed within the confines of and providing service to customers in the plat shall be installed underground. (b) In Public Easements. All electric and gas distribution lines and piping, roadways, curbs,. walks and other similar improvements shall be constructed only on a street, alley or other public way or easement which is designated on a plat or subdivision approved by the Council pursuant hereto, or which has otherwise been approved by the Council. Sec. 16. Street Maintenance. Until a street in a plat or subdivision has been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City, and the Engineer has certified as to such completion, the owner shall keep such street,'if used for public travel, in a safe condition for such use, at his /her own expense. The City shall not be chargeable with the cost of or the responsibility for the maintenance of such street until the completion of such street has been so certified. -21- Sec. 17. Penalty. (a) Any person who shall violate any provision of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to penalties pursuant to City Ordinance No. 175. (b) Also any person who conveys a lot, tract or parcel in violation of Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.358, Subd. 4b (which is hereby incorporated herein by reference) shall forfeit and pay to the City a penalty of not less than $100.00 for each lot, tract or parcel so conveyed. Also, the City may enjoin such conveyance, or recover such penalty, by a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction. (c) The person violating this ordinance, or said Section 462.358, Subd. 4b, shall also pay all costs incurred by the City in enforcing this ordinance or prosecuting such violation, including reasonable attorneys' fees. Sec. 18, Repealer. Ordinance No. 801 is hereby repealed in its entirety. Sec. 19. Effective Date; Filing. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its adoption and publication and, when effective, shall be filed with the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Mayor Attest: Clerk First Reading: Second Reading: Published in the Edina Sun on Filed in County Recorder's Office on , as Document No. -22- 29558 ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A30 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 825 TO REQUIRE LARGER MINIMUM LOT AREAS AND DIMENSIONS FOR CERTAIN LOTS IN THE SINGLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT (R -1) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Subparagraph 1(a) of paragraph E of Section 11 (Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1)) of Ordinance No. 825 is hereby amended to read as follows: (a) single dwelling unit building 9,000 square feet; provided, however, if the lot is in a plat or subdivision approved pursuant to Ordinance No. 804 of the City, then the minimum lot area shall be the same as determined for lots in such plat or subdivision pursuant to said ordinance: Sec. 2. Subparagraph 2 of paragraph E of Section 11 (Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1)) of Ordinance No. 825 is hereby amended to read as follows: 2. Minimum Lot Width. Single dwelling unit building -1- 75 feet; provided, however, if the lot is in a plat or subdivision approved pursuant to Ordinance No. 804 of the City, then the minimum lot width shall be the same as determined for lots in such plat or subdivision pursuant to said ordinance. Sec. 3. Subparagraph 3 of paragraph E of Section 11 (Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1)) of Ordinance No. 825 is hereby amended to read as follows: 2. Minimum Lot Depth. Single dwelling unit building 120 feet; provided, however, if the lot is in a plat or subdivision approved pursuant to Ordinance No. 804 of the City, then the minimum lot depth shall be the same as determined for lots in such plat,or subdivision pursuant to said ordinance. Sec. 4. There is hereby added to paragraph E of Section 11 (Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1)) of Ordinance No. 825 a new subparagraph 4 as follows: "4. Minimum Lot Width to Perimeter Ratio. Each lot shall have a lot width to perimeter ratio of not less than 0.1." Sec. 5. There is hereby added to paragraph D (Definitions) of Section 3 of Ordinance No. 825, and inserted in the proper alphabetical order in said paragraph D, the following additional definition: "Lot Width to Perimeter Ratio: the quantity resulting from dividing the lot width by the total lineal feet in the perimeter of that lot. Sec. 5. Subparagraph 3 of Paragraph T. of Section 7 of Ordinance No. 825 is hereby amended to read as follows: "3. Non - Conforming Lots. A non - conforming lot in the R -1 District used or intended for a single dwelling unit building shall be exempt from the width, depth and area requirements of this ordinance, provided, that said lot: (a) is not less than 50 feet in width; -2- (b) is not less than 100 feet in depth; (c) has at least 30 feet frontage on a street; and (d) is not at the effective date of this ordinance, or has not at any time subsequent to such effective date, and has not been at any time since October 22, 1951, held in common ownership with all or part of an adjoining lot or parcel which, together, comply with the minimum width, depth and area requirements imposed by this ordinance. A non - conforming lot held as of, or at any time subsequent to, the effective date of this ordinance, or at any time since October 22, 1951, in common ownership with all or part of an adjoining parcel or lot and which meets the requirements of (a), (b) and (c) above, shall not be decreased in size." Sec. 6. This ordinance shall be in effect upon its passage and publication. Attest: Clerk First Reading: Second Reading: Published in the Edina Sun on -3- Mayor 1�_ -- /� *Amendment Zoning Ordinance No. 825 and New Subdivision Ordinance No. 804 Mrs. Larsen explained to the Commission that before them this evening is a draft of Ordinance 804 and amendments to Ordinance 825. He said the amendment to Ordinance No. 825 and the new 804 are a result of Commission input, staff input, and working with the legal staff retained by the City of Edina. He explained the changes and additions implemented by the Ordinances and to the application process would result in the Commission receiving pertinent information at the onset allowing them to carefully review and arrive at a educated decision. He asked the Commission to recall that in the past, inquiries about topography, and lot sizes in the surrounding neighborhood were requested quite often after the item was first heard. The new application process should expedite matters. The Commission expressed approval of the draft of the proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 825 and the new Amendment No. 804, offering the following comments and observations. Chairman G.Johnson asked Mr. Larsen if in his opinion (and City Attorney Tom Erickson) the new Ordinances would be able to withstand'scrutiny by the court if a suit would be levied against the City. Mr. Larsen said staff, and the City Attorney feel the proposed amendments would withstand a court review. Mr. Larsen cautioned, however, that each case is individual and judged individuality on its own merits. Mr. Larsen stated he feels the proposed amendments meet the requirements of the City and ensure that the City maintains its.residential character and symmetry. Further, Mr. Larsen explained that the new application process places additional requirements on the proponent. One requirement, that was alluded to earlier, that will benefit staff and the Commission, is when an application for subdivision is submitted to the City, the proponent is required to supply lot sizes of lots within the original plat, and 350 feet from the perimeter of the property proposed for subdivision. It should also'be noted that if an original plat is extremely large (i.e West Minneapolis Heights, Morningside plats) the limit for the proponent supplying lot sizes is 1000 ft. Mr. Larsen pointed out lot sizes of an area have been routinely requested by Members of the Commission. Commissioner Shaw asked Mr. Larsen what is the definition of neighborhood? Mr. Larsen explained for the subdivision process the definition of neighborhood is: * 350 foot radius from the proposed subdivision; * the original plat; or * 1000 foot radius from the proposed subdivision if the original plat exceeds 1000 feet. Commissioner Hale questioned what would be the "neighborhood" of a proposed subdivision if it abuts a public park. Mr. Larsen answered the same criteria applies to a proposed subdivision abutting.a public park. Mr. Larsen added a limit has to be set and if a park is over 1000 feet in depth it may be realistic to assume they will not be adversely impacted by a proposal over 1000 feet away. Commissioner L. Johnson told the Commission he generally approves of the proposed ordinance amendments but feels the minimum lot size requirements for subdivision in the City should be increased. He pointed out the majority of new developments within the City are not on lots of 9000 square feet. Commissioner L. Johnson noted that urban development could occur within the City in areas of small lots. The City will have to be willing to come to an educated solution if that would occur that will benefit the City. Mr. Larsen said that may become a an issue in the future and City Staff, the Commission, and Council will have to develop performance standards. Mr. Mike Bolen of 5207 Doncaster told the Board he was present on behalf of his client, Mr. Keinith and himself. Mr. Bolen said he agrees with some aspects of the new ordinances but finds it lacking. He said the City should not enable the subdivision of any single family lot to be effortless. He pointed out private covenants should be protected by the City and enforced. He added when someone purchases a property within the City they should be assured that the original plat is protected and the area will be maintained in its original form. He added the City does not go far enough in protecting private covenants within an original plat. Further, Mr. Bolen said subdivision of a property should not solely be for monetary gains. A person should not be allowed to purchase property in a neighborhood, subdivide it and make a profit. Chairman G. Johnson clarified for Mr. Bolen that the Commission does not look at economics when determining if a parcel of land is subdividable or not. He pointed out the Commission when reviewing a proposal has no idea how much the proponent paid for the property, or the amount of money the proponent intends to sell the new lot for. Their decision is based on many standards, including comparable lot size, character, symmetry, topography, traffic safety, and if, or if not, the proposal negatively impacts the neighborhood. Commission McClelland agreed with Commissioner G. Johnsons comments and pointed out the Commission has always walked the site, reviewed it carefully with the aide of the Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision'Ordinance and the Comprehensive plan, and neighborhood input. They then arrive at an educated decision. Mr. Bolen said in his opinion the following information should be required from the proponent and delivered to the City Planner (if reasonably available) for the application process: * A copy of the original plat and replats thereof; in a neighborhood; * A copy of the so- called residential protective covenants, easements, restrictions, adopted at or about the time of the plat; * topographical elevations of original plat and replat thereof; * Aerial photographs of the neighborhood; * Developers agreement for original plat and replat of the neighborhood; * Sales brochures issued to the original purchaser of lot of the original plat or replat of the neighborhood; * Any other documents or information relative to the original and amended plan of development for the neighborhood. * Statement regarding the changes in the original or re- plated plat which would justify granting a subdivision or replat of a lot or part thereof that was originally a single family dwelling unit. Mr. Bolen said these eight items would "pin- down" the original plat. Mr. Bolen added he would like to see under Section 14, subparagraph 6, as to criteria, "that in granting a plat or subdivision, the applicant of the proposed replat of a subdivision of a platted or originally platted single family lot has failed to bare the burden or proof by clear and convincing evidence that the original development plan for his single dwelling unit lot and the neighborhood has so changed as to justify the granting of his application to create two or more buildable lots where only one was originally or subsequently provided for." Commissioner Faust pointed out to Mr. Bolen that the attempt of a subdivision within his neighborhood failed. She added she felt the reviewal process the Commission and Council follow work when all aspects of community planning are considered. Commissioner Faust noted that the cost for the proponent to supply the City with lot size, topography etc, could be significant and may deter a number of persons. Mr. Larsen agreed that cost could be a factor to an elderly property owner who years ago purchased a home on a large lot with the prospect of dividing it as a cushion for retirement. Commissioner McClelland told Mr. Bolen that Members of the Commission, and the Council, want Edina to stay a single family community and have done their best in maintaining that character. Commissioner McClelland added there may be areas within the City where new development is not harmful and it is unrealistic to assume that new development will not occur in those areas of our City. Mr. Bolen agreed, but added his main concern and fear is with the "one' lot subdivision requests. The Commission agreed that "one" lot subdivisions must be looked at very carefully. Commissioner McClelland moved to recommend to Council the adoption the amendments to Zoning Ordinance No. 825 and Subdivision Ordinance No. 804. Commissioner L. Johnson seconded the motion. Ayes; G. Johnson, L. Johnson, H. McClelland, R. Hale, N. Faust, V. Shaw. Motion carried,. (Note: This proposal is not subject to oratorium placed on single family lots) Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the ect property is Phase I of the condominium development at Centenn' akes. The property will ultimately contain six buildings with appr ately 46 units in each building. Buildings one and two are now under c ruction. Lot three through six are owned by the Edina HRA and will be co ed'to Laukka as sales permit. Platting the property is necessary for the eyance and financing of the individual buildings. Mr. Larsen con ed staff recommends approval of the plat as proposed. Commissio Palmer moved to recommend subdivision approval. Mr. Workinger second he motion. Ayes; H. McClelland, J. Bailey, D. Johnson N Faust, L. son, G. Workinger, V. Shaw, J. tion c led. Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance Amendment for Single Family Subdivisions ��G��� Resident, Mr. Mike Bolen was present. A majority of Members of the Planning Commission expressed approval in changes made to the application, process when one requests to subdivide their single family property. There was a discussion over whether the minimum lot size should be increased from 9,000 square feet. The majority of the Planning Commission believes that flexibility is needed when studying a request for subdivision. The 9,000 square foot lot size as a minimum, with the recommended guidelines included in the subdivision application process is adequate. Resident of Edina, Mike Bolen, told the Commission when reviewing an application for subdivision, Members of the Commission and Council should take into consideration the private deed restrictions that were in place when a property was purchased. The proposed amendment and guidelines do not mention private deed restrictions. Commissioner Palmer moved to recommend to the Council the proposed changes to the Subdivision Amendment and the addition of proposed guidelines, which will be included in the application process. Commissioner Shaw seconded the motion. Ayes; G. Johnson, H. McClelland, N. Faust, J. Bailey, D. Johnson, V. Shaw, Palmer, Workinger. Nays; L. Johnson. Motion Carried. V. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 10:35 p.m. I nci . He said e Planning Commission is an advisory board. Mr. Strommen said he does no ant any.changes to the church and does not want to see the lots across fro the church used as parking spaces. Commissioner Palmer suggested that this item needs furt/sit pointed out he would like to see the City enter into a Proof of eement with the Church, and would like to have the Church indicate lan, where additional parking can be achieved on site, if the City s additional parking is required. Commissioner Palmer also added th like the City to review the possibility' of constructing a hammerround at the end of the north parking lot, thus eliminating the accerom 69th Street. Commissioner Palmer moved to continue C -89 -2 until 0 July 5, 1989 Community Development and Planning Commission Meeting in /ord to give City staff and members of the Church time to develop a Proof oking Agreement and to look into the possibility of constructing a hammerh rn around. Commissioner McClelland seconded the motion. All voted a . Motion carried. LD -89 -4 South Edina Developmet}*Addition. Centennial Lakes Edina HRA and Laukka 4fiVhd Associates (NOTE: THIS ACTION IS NOT TO THE SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION MORATORIUM) Mr. Larsen informed the mmission the HRA is preparing to convey, to Laukka, the Phase II land for ndominium development at Centennial Lakes. The proposed lot divisi 0 provided the necessary legal description for conveyance of the property. Mr. Larsen co luded staff recommend approval. Commissio r Palmer moved to recommend approval. ssioner Shaw seconded the mot' Ayes; Faust, Hale, McClellan r, Shaw, G. Johnson. Motion carri SINESS: C• �` Continued Discussion on the Subdivision Ordinance Members of the Planning Commission and Mr. Larsen discussed the Subdivision Ordinance. Below are noted suggestions: * The new amendment has served the City well. A new term for neighbor- hood may be needed. * Flexibility must be maintained. tr * Asa result of the Berenberg case the Commission and Council can not let any ruling interfere with their judgements or findings. * It is the nature of the Council and Commission to make judgements. * The Ordinance should stay in place and the City can implement into Zoning Ordinance No. 825, Section 11. E. 1. (a) and implement into the application process "Submission Guidelines ". Commissioner Palmer said the Commission feels the current amendment works well except for the addition of certain technicalities with the recommendation that we adopt submission guidelines"and adopt into the Zoning Ordinance No. 825, Section 11. E. 1.(a) except for #5. Planning Commission Membership on the Edina Board of Appeals - Information Chairman G. Johnson noted the memo from Mr. Erickson regarding the role of Commission Members on the Edina Board of Appeals and Adjustments. Commissioner Palmer made a motion stating Planning Commission Members are official representatives of the Edina Community Development and Planning Commission to the Edina Board of Appeals and Adjustments. Commissioner McClelland seconded the motion. All vote aye. Motion carried. V. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 10:35 p.m. Hoogenakker, Secretary Discussion on Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance Amendments Continued discussion occurred between Mr. Larsen and Members of the Planning Commission regarding the materials presented by Staff on changes to the Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance. It was suggested that it may be advantageous for the Commission and Staff to consider the possibility of increasing the minimum requirements for lot size. Mr. Larsen said that.could be further studied, but added, the 9,000 square foot minimum lot size is a minimum on where to begin. Commission McClelland agreed adding that there are areas in'Edina where there are 9,000 square foot lots, so any increase must be carefully reviewed. She added the City must be considered with all its various sections in mind. One item the Commission expressed support for was that the proposed changes-in,the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances must incorporate into its wording language from the City's Comprehensive Plan. Commission Members expressed favor over the additional requirements proposed to be supplied by the proponent (i.e, lot size, topography, etc.) during the application process. IV. ADJOURNMENT: 'he meeting was adjourned at 10:00 p.m. ��Jin Hoogenakker, S c etary III. OTHER BUSINESS: ,?C• �15�Sq Discussion of Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance Amendments Mr. Larsen told Members of the Commission that during the past ten weeks City Staff has reviewed the City of Edina's subdivision process. He explained that the materials sent in the Commission packet to be reviewed are "brain storm" ideas that staff would like the Commission's input on an on going basis. Members of the Commission agreed to review the materials collected by Staff and will have suggestions and comments prepared for the April 26, 1989, Planning Commission Meeting. M E M O R A N D U M DATE: March 29, 1989 TO: Members of the Community Development and Planning Commission FROM: Craig Larsen, City Planner SUBJECT: DISCUSSION OF SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS During the past 10 weeks the City staff has reviewed the Edina subdivision process. The following items were investigated: > Analysis of subdivision proposals since January 1, 1985 > Analysis of current subdivision standards > Analysis of the Edina Comprehensive Plan > Analysis of the housing stock and neighborhood composition of property zoned in the single family dwelling unit district > Analysis of alternative regulating methods including: - single family sub - districts which include estate lot zoning by petition which Bloomington and Inver Grove Heights use - strict minimum standards methods where approval is granted when proposals meet minimum guidelines which can be quantified such as in St. Louis Park - incentive methods where developers receive density bonuses and relaxed requirements when they incorporate certain features into plats such as conservation easements, public waters access, and others - subjective methods where proposals are reviewed in light of the overall public good and compliance with quantifiable standards are considered to be of less importance The investigation completed to date has produced the following conclusions: 1. Edina consists of a variety of neighborhoods and dwelling,types. The diverse character of Edina is desirable and should be preserved. 2. Edina is nearly fully developed, however, a significant number of property owners control property which could be considered for further development. 3. 84% of the proposed subdivisions since January 1 of 1985 have been approved as presented or-modified during the hearing process. These approvals have produced a diversity of lots in a variety of neighborhoods. (Please refer to the attached Review of Platting History summary). G 1 t, , r� 4. Both quantifiable standards and subjective review have been considered when reviewing subdivision proposals. S U M M A R Y The end product of the existing subdivision process has produced results reflecting sound community planning. The process of achieving those-results has often been difficult and controversial. To continue the desirable results of the existing process but reduce the uncertainty and controversy, the staff has expanded on the standards and policies used to review subdivision proposals. The attached draft sets specific standards and principles to be used in the review. SUMMARY OF SUBDIVISIONS AS OF JANUARY 1, 1985 Number of proposals considered: 25 Number of proposals approved: 21 Number of NEW lots: 85 Range of lot sizes approved: 9,282 - 48,900 s.f. Approximate average lot size approved: 21,076 s.f. Criteria considered by the Planning Commission as determined from a review of the minutes: * lot area * lot width * concept of neck lot * frontage on a public street * "size and shape" * density * "character and symmetry of the neighborhood" * steep slopes * setback from naturally occuring water bodies * spacing and location of homes EXAMPLES OF LOT WIDTH TO PERIMETER RATIO 140' -- - - - - -- 160' - - - -- 120' 160' 9116A - - -- 80- - - - -1 200' 180' 80' - -- 140' i� O N ),A, m O REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland Agenda Item # TV- B'• From: Craig Larsen Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: October 16, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Sign Ordinance Amendment 0 To Council Mixed Development District MDD -6 Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution 0 Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Approve 2nd Reading for Sign Ordinance Amendment for Mixed Development Info /Background: The Council granted first reading for the Meeting. The approval was granted on the clude a restriction on signage facing res Staff is recommending that signage not be portions of development in MDD districts. to Edinborough. ti amendment at its October 2, 1989, condition that the Ordinance in- idential portions of the development. allowed facing residential or park This restriction will also apply ORDINANCE NO. 451 -A6 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 451 BY ADDING REGULATIONS FOR MIXED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT The City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, Ordains: Section 1. Section 5, paragraph (h) (1) of Ordinance No. 451 is hereby amended by adding the following: (d) MDD -6 District: One sign per development not to exceed 1000 square feet in area. For developments with more than one street frontage, one additional sign per street frontage provided each additional sign does not exceed 70 square feet in area. Section 2. Section 5, paragraph (h) is hereby amended by adding the following subparagraphs: (10) Project Identification Signs in MDD -6 District: One freestanding sign for each project per street frontage. The total area of a freestanding sign shall not exceed 50 square feet. (11) Retail Signs: The total area of all wall signs affixed to a building wall shall not exceed 15% of total area of that wall. No signs shall be placed on walls of buildings used for non - residential purposes which walls directly face, abut or adjoin a public park or residential use as such parks or uses are shown on the finally approved Overall Development Plan. (12) Suites Hotels: (a) Wall Signs: The total area of all wall signs affixed to a building shall not exceed 15% of the total area of that wall. No signs shall be placed on walls of buildings used for non - residential purposes which walls directly face, abut or adjoin a public park or residential use as such parks or uses are shown on the finally approved Overall Development Plan. (b) Free - standing Signs: One free standing sign for each building per street frontage. The total area of a free - standing sign for a building having one street frontage shall not exceed 100 square feet. Where a building has two or more street frontages, additional permitted free- standing signs shall not exceed 50 square feet in area. The maximum height of free standing signs shall be 25 feet. Section 3. Section 2 of Ordinance No. 451 is hereby amended by adding the following definition: (bb) "Project" in the Mixed Development District means a multi - family residential complex containing 10 or more units, a shopping center or area, theatre complex containing five or more screens, an office building complex containing three or more buildings, or a public institutional or recreational use. w91OA, Ai i� ' • ,N�bRPORI�t�9 • • �BBe , REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland /agenda Item # IV. C: From: Craig Larsen Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: October 16, 1989 Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Amendment to Ordinance 0 To Council No. 825 to add private clubs as a permitted Action ❑ Motion use in the PC -1, Commercial Zone. ❑Resolution Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Approve proposed amendment 3s recommended by the Planning Commission Info /Background: See attached Memorandum and Planning Commission Minutes. * Zoning Ordinance Amendment to allow private clubs in the PC -1 Commercial 'District Mr.' Larsen told the Commission currently private, non profit clubs are allowed in the PC -2 and PC -3 Commercial Districts. The proposed amendment would add as a permitted use in the PC -1 District, clubs, lodge halls, meeting rooms, offices and other facilities for non profit organizations not exceeding 2,500 square feet of gross floor area. Mr. Larsen added the proposed amendment would allow the Edina American Legion to relocate from the Grandview area to, the Cahill - Amundson shopping area. The Legion has lost its lease in the old Biltmore Building. Commissioner L. Johnson questioned if it is a good idea to allow a private club in this district because its not a retail draw. Commission L. Johnson pointed out many retail "strip" malls are in trouble. Mr. Larsen agreed that the Cahill - Amundson area needs re- design or re- development to remain a viable mall area. He added the Legion anticipates renting space on a short term basis. The Legion has been in the Community for a number of years and they can not afford the high rent in permitted districts. Commissioner McClelland pointed out that it is important to remember that the Legion is non - profit and the proposed limited square footage allowed for the club should prevent other non - profit organizations from relocating to this district because of the square footage limitation. Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Larsen to clarify the square footage the Legion would be using. Mr. Larsen said the square footage they are renting is 1300 square feet. Commission L. Johnson reiterated that this center needs to work, but he wants to make sure this use is temporary. Commissioner G Johnson asked Mr. Larsen if he knew how many members attend this Legion. Mr. Larsen answered he was not sure, but the membership is not large. Commissioner Faust asked where would the Legion move if they couldn't relocate to this site. Mr. Larsen said they have no where to go. Members of the Commission commented that the Legion has given much to the Community in terms of sponsoring athletic teams and events. Commissioner McClelland move to recommend that private clubs are to be allowed in the PC -1 Commercial District and not to exceed 2,500 square feet of space. Commission Faust seconded the motion. All voted aye. Motion carried. M E M O R A N D U M DATE: September 27, 1989 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Craig Larsen SUBJECT: Zoning Ordinance Amendment to allow private clubs in the PC -1, Commercial District Currently private, non profit clubs are allowed in the PC -2 and PC -3, Commercial Districts. The proposed amendment would add the following as a permitted use in the PC -1 District. Clubs, lodge halls and meeting rooms, offices and other facilities for non - profit organizations not exceeding 2,500 square �eet of gross floor area. In the PC -2 and PC -3 Districts we do not limit the size of clubs. The limitation proposed in PC -1 is consistent with the limitation placed on other uses such as bakeries and clothing stores. The proposed amendment would allow the Edina American Legion to relocate from the Grandview area to the Cahill - Amundson shopping area. The Legion has lost its lease in the old Biltmore Building. ° '� REQUEST F N' �q OR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR -PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: 16 October, 1989 AGENDA ITEM VI. A. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Storm Sewer Renovation - Grove Street STS -196 Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. 0 & P Contracting, Inc. 1. $ 30,278.50 2. S.M. Hentges & Sons 2. $ 32,608.00 % G.L. Contracting 3. $ 36,148.65 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: 0 & P Contracting, Inc. $ 30,278.50 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is renovation of existing system on Grove Street between Tracy and Stuart Avenues. The funds for this project are from the Stormwater Utility. Additionally, we recommend rejecting the balance of the bid for Storm Sewer Projects 195, 199 and 200. Project 195 (Woodcrest Drive) will be handled by City crews as it is small enough for City to complete. Projects 199 (Parklawn Avenue Repair) and 200 (Edina Manor) will be rebid. - Public Works - Stormwater gnat a Deeartroent The Recommended bid is within budget not Kenneth Rosland, City Manager ity Director ° ch REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF K000 DATE: 16 October, 1989 AGENDA ITEM VI. B ITEM DESCRIPTION: Concrete Sidewalk Improvements 5 -43, , 5 -44 & 5 -46 Company Amount of Quote or &d 1. Victor Carlson & Sons, Inc. 1• $ 91,253.50 2. Sunram Landscaping 2. $ 92,785.50 3. Gunderson Bros. Cement Contractors 3. $ 99,448.00 4• Standard Sidewalk, Inc. 4• $100,797.00 5. Austin P. Keller Constr. Co. Inc. 5. $115,210.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Victor Carlson & Sons, Inc. $ 91,253.50 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for sidewalks on Gleason Road from Dewey Hill to Schey, Gleason Road from Schey to Loch Moor and Xerxes Avenue from West 60th to West 62nd. Funding for the project will be from the capital plan. The Engineer's Estimate was $99,276.50. Engineering Si atur Depart n The Recommended bid is within budget not witJoint6dget ,-J-o�n Wallin, Fina Director Kenneth Rosland, City f REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: City Council Members FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director of Park and Recreation Department VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00 DATE: October 12, 1989 AGENDA ITEM VI. D ITEM DESCRIPTION: Replacement Roof for Braemar Club House Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Curran V. Nielsen Co., Inc. 1. $21,900 2• Walker Roofing Co. 2. $34,900 3• 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Curran V. Nielsen Co., Inc. at $21,900 GENERAL INFORMATION: Replace old clubhouse roof with.a new and energy efficient roof. The Recommended bid is .z within budget not within fidget 4ohn)Wallin, Kenneth Rosland City o' REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00 DATE: 16 October 1989 AGENDA ITEM VI. E. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Hydraulic Hammer Attachment Companv Amount of Quote or &d 1. Hayden Murphy Equipment Co. 1. $ 12,950.00 2. Aspen Equipment Co. 2. $ 13,965.00 3. Allied Hammer 3. $ 14,450.00 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Hayden Murphy Equipment Co. $ 12,950.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This hydraulic hammer replaces Unit Number 25 -408 which was purchased in 1980 and wore out.- The funds for this purchase are from the.equip- ment replacement fund. Signa ure J' The Recommended bid is within budget not ilic Works Depa, e t n Ilin. Fi n e Director Kenneth Roslanb, City Manager 1Z.1A..iI o 71, i e . REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: City Council Members FROM: Bob Kojetin VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: _REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000 DATE: October 10, 1989 AGENDA ITEM VI.F ITEM DESCRIPTION: Tree Replacement - Braemar Golf Course Company Amount of Quote or &d 1• Landscape & Turf 1. $ 9,500 2. Natural Green. 2; $10,195 3. 3 4. 4. 5. 5. n RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR END: Landscape & Turf GENERAL INFORMATION: 32 assorted trees for areas on the 18 and Executive 9 hole golf course WE The Recommended bid is within budget not within buq0 V�allin, Fin#ce Director Kenneth Rosland City Man VII. A. MINUTES TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE OCTOBER 10, 1989 9:00 A.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Fran Hoffman, Chairman .Alison Fuhr Gordon Hughes Craig Swanson Bob Sherman MEMBERS ABSENT: None OTHERS PRESENT: Mr. Gary Hanus, 5336 Brookview Avenue Mr. and Mrs. Dennis LaFrance, 5357 Oaklawn Avenue Ms. Andy Otness, 5433 Kellogg Avenue Ms. Teresa McCarthy, 5537 Brookview Avenue Ms. Bee Scofield, 5601 Kellogg Place Mr. and Mrs. Steve Timmer, 5348 Oaklawn Avenue Mr. John Carlis, 5208 Meadow Ridge Mr. and Mrs. Bryan Colwell, 5401 Oaklawn Avenue Ms. Gay Eastman, Jerry's Enterprises, 5101_ Vernon Avenue Mr. Norm-Nielsen, 7708 Gleason Road Captain Len Kleven, Edina Police Department Ms. Joan Waterstreet, Edina Police Department SECTION A Requests on which the Committee recommends approval as requested or modified, and the Council's authorization of recommended action. (1) Request to change three -hour parking restrictions in Jerry's Parking Ramp, 5101 Vernon Avenue South. Request received from Robert Shadduck, Executive Vice President, Jerry's Enterprises. , ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Hoffman moved to remove the restriction of three -hour parking from the southern wall and the east side of the middle aisle of the lower level ramp that is presently so designated. Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0. (Mr. Swanson temporarily absent when vote was called). (2) Discuss warrant study for a 3 -way "STOP" sign at West 70th Street and Tracy Avenue. Continued from July, 1989 meeting. Y' 1 TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES October 10, 1989 Page 2 ACTION TAKEN: Per Mr. Hoffman, the striping layout on West 70th Street is being completed as well as the warrant study, and at this time the results would show a multi -way "STOP" sign warrant based on volume and approach speeds. Mr. Swanson moved installation of a 3 -way "STOP" sign at West 70th Street and Tracy Avenue based on speed and volume warrants. Mr. Sherman seconded the motion. Motion carried 5 -0. SECTION B Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request. (1) Discuss traffic safety concerns on Halifax Avenue between 5032 and West 54th Street. Request received from Anne Bishop and John Crist, 5324 Halifax Avenue. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Hoffman began by giving a synopsis of an earlier discussion at this . meeting regarding the lowering of speed limits to 25 MPH. In discussions with Minneapolis and St. Paul, it is apparent that the State will not look at this issue on a street by street basis. Furthermore, if they were to take this one location into consideration for lower limits, it would not meet the criteria and warrants necessary for reduction of speed. (NOTE: Attachment 1). Minneapolis is suggesting legislation for lowering resi- dential speed limits to 25 MPH. Ms. Bishop stated that since the removal of the temporary barricade, she felt that not only were the speeds increasing again on Halifax, but also the volume was high again from the 50th and France business district and also from Grace Church. Therefore, she requested turning restriction signs be placed on Halifax to limit southbound traffic at West 51st Street on Monday through Friday, from 3:00 to 6:00 PM, and also limit northbound traffic at 54th Street on Monday through Friday, from 7:00 to 10:00 AM. Mr. Hughes asked if the City had any similar restrictive signs at present and was advised that the only restrictive turn signs with time designations were 'at semaphores for turning on the red light. Mrs..Fuhr also asked if there were some way traffic could be directed at Grace Church to prevent the heavy use of Halifax Avenue by the parishioners. Mr. Hoffman asked if there was a noticeable difference in traffic patterns, volume or speed during the France Avenue construction project and was told that there was no apparent difference. Mr. Hoffman then stated that the Council's instructions were to monitor the situation on Halifax for one year. We had, in fact, done that. At this time, there are no warrants to conclude that the area is unsafe. His only suggestion for improvement would be the installation of sidewalks, which would be approached from a public hearing standpoint to decide if the area residents would be receptive. He also felt that without warrants, the installation of any restrictive signing was also possibly a matter for public hearing. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES October 10, 1989 Page 3 Mr. Swanson moved that no action be taken based on no significant changes and recommended to Ms. Bishov that the option of public hearing on sidewalk installation was still open to the neighborhood. Mr. Sherman seconded the motion. Motion carried 5 -0. SECTION C Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others. (1) Discuss traffic safety concerns on West 54th Street, France Avenue to Wooddale Avenue. Continued from September meeting. ACTION TAKEN: Captain Kleven began by reviewing the accident statistics from last month's meeting. From 1983 to present, there have been 51 accidents at this loca- tion, 42 of those being at the intersection of France Avenue and West 54th Street. The remaining nine accidents in over five years were at various locations between France Avenue and Wooddale Avenue. He also stated that four traffic surveys were completed during morning rush hour period of 7:30 to 8:30 AM. The compliance was relatively low at 55 to 578 compliance and, should enforcement efforts been underway, seven citations would have been issued. He has added West 54th Street to the Traffic Enforcement Unit's on -going assignment. Mr. Hoffman reviewed a current newpaper article that addresses the reduction of residential speed limits from 30 MPH to 25 MPH. He then reviewed an analysis that he had made of three locations scheduled for discussion at this meeting based on criteria established by MNDOT for such a reduction. (NOTE: Attachment 1). Part of the formula-is based on the consideration that 858 of drivers would drive at a given speed that would not lend itself to being an unsafe speed. As the attachment shows, two of the locations, including West 54th Street, if considered for rezoning, would stay at 30 MPH. The third location, West 70th Street, could actually warrant raising the limit to 35 MPH. Based on this information, Mr. Hoffman suggested that lobbying State legislators for overall State reduction would be'the only legitimate option. Ms. Andy Otness then presented the results of the neighborhood survey which was conducted to establish usage patterns on and around West 54th Street. Seventy -one surveys were completed. Questions included reasons for crossing West 54th, at what time of day, destination, and what inter- section of West 54th was most currently being utilized for crossing. The results were that pedestrian and bicycle traffic most crossed West 54th Street. The numbers were fairly even as to times of day that West 54th was being crossed, and also as to the intersection most frequently being used. Ms. Otness also stated that, although not individually counted in the survey, there are approximately 30 children at Creekside Children's Place, a nursery school located at 4113 West 54th Street, who cross almost daily to go to Arden Park. The pattern of pedestrians seems to be a cir- r r-, TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE'MINUTES October 10, 1989 Page 4 cular path on Kellogg and Brookview between West 52nd and West 55th Streets. Ms. Otness requested speed enforcement and also "STOP" sign placement at Oaklawn Avenue. Mr. Steve Timmer stated that he noticed speed increases during the diver- sion of traffic during the West 50th Street renovation. He also noted that most problems occur during rush hour and also on weekends when pedestrian traffic in the area is high. Mr. Bryan Colwell felt that when the Minnehaha Creek is used in the summer, there is also an increased hazard due to numbers of pedestrians. He also felt that turning onto West 54th Street from Minnehaha Boulevard was very difficult and a "STOP" sign at this location should be considered. Mr. Hughes asked if the grade of the road at Minnehaha was conducive to "STOP" sign placement. Mr. Hoffman stated that both Minnehaha Boulevard and Brookview Drive would warrant "STOP SIGN AHEAD" sign placement due to the grade of the road at these locations. Mrs. Fuhr asked about the possibility of advisory signs or amber blinking lights. Mr. Hoffman's observation was that 25 MPH advisory signing on a straight roadway tended not to reduce speeds. Captain Kleven also added that advisory signs are advisory only and therefore we could not legally cite drivers for not observing those limits. He also stated that overall speed tolerance is lower in residential areas. Mr. Swanson also stated that the burden of proof rests with the officer and that not only speed, but also road conditions, equipment conditions, etc. were all considera- tions to arrive at acceptable tolerances. Therefore, tolerances are never exactly set and even persons driving at less than the speed limit may, on occasion, be cited should the situation warrant. Representatives of the neighborhood feel that placement of a "STOP" sign at both Oaklawn and Halifax Avenues plus 25 MPH advisory signs would not be an unreasonable request. Mr. Hughes observed that the residents seemed to be asking for the "STOP" sign placement to serve as an "interruptor" of a collector street. His concern is that placement at either Halifax Avenue or Oaklawn would not, in fact, fulfill that purpose. Placement of a sign at either Minnehaha Boulevard or Brookview seemed more logical to him except for the steeper grades of the roadway at these intersections. Mr. Hughes moved that the item be continued for one month pending further engineering investigation of West 54th Street at Minnehaha Boulevard, that a "SCHOOL" sign be placed adjacent to Creekside Children's Place, and a recommendation that the Traffic Enforcement Unit continue speed enforcement efforts on West 54th Street. Mrs. Fuhr asked to amend the motion to include engineering survey of Oaklawn Avenue also. Mr. Hughes did not accept the amendment. Mrs. Fuhr withdrew the amendment. Mr. Hoffman seconded the motion. Motion failed 2 -3. Mrs. Fuhr moved that the item be continued for one month pending further engineering_ study of West 54th Street at both Minnehaha Boulevard and Oaklawn Avenue, that a "SCHOOL" sign be placed adjacent to Creekside Children's Place and recommended continued enforcement efforts by the Traffic Enforcement Unit. Mr. Sherman seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -1. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES October 10, 1989 Page 5 (2) Request for installation of "STOP" signs on Meadow Ridge at Everett Place. Continued from September meeting. ACTION TAKEN: .Mr. John Carlis stated that he is requesting the "STOP" sign installation because the intersection is presently uncontrolled, there are several children in the area, the speeds seem to be high, and Meadow Ridge and Everett is now a school bus stop for the children. Captain Kleven said that there were no reportable accidents at the inter- section, and that at present no speed surveys had been conducted in the area. Mr. Swanson advised Mr. Carlis that installation of a "STOP" sign must be warranted. At present, there was no accident history and the right -of -way was defined at the intersection. Therefore, it would be inconsistent with established policy to recommend a "STOP" sign. Mr. Hughes also offered that the intersection is unobstructed and not unlike several other inter- sections in Edina. Mr. Swanson moved that the item be continued until a speed survey could be conducted in the area. Mrs. Fuhr seconded the motion. Motion carried 5 -0. 6 (3) Discuss traffic safety concerns on Gleason Road near West 78th Street. Request received from Norm Nielsen, 7708 Gleason Road. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Nielsen addressed the Committee with his concern for potential accidents in front of his home at 7708 Gleason Road. There is a somewhat blind curve in front of his home for southbound Gleason Road. The proxi- mity of this curve to the intersection of West 78th Street and Gleason Road makes it somewhat dangerous if vehicles are stacked at the "STOP" sign at this intersection awaiting entrance onto West 78th Street. Mr. Nielsen has observed cars traveling at a fast speed approaching this intersection and has witnessed them swing wide into the oncoming lane to avoid rear - ending a stopped vehicle ahead. He questioned whether the Committee might have some solution on slowing traffic before personal injury results from this situation. Captain Kleven reviewed the accident history of the 7600 and 7700 blocks of.Gleason Road and also the intersection of Gleason Road and-West 78th Street. There have been 26 accidents to date, 20 of those which were reportable. Fourteen of the 20 were at the intersection of West 78th and Gleason and six were between the 7600 and 7700 blocks of Gleason. The most common causes were unsafe speed and failure to yield. Captain Kleven also stated that there had been no speed survey conducted in this area except at Bonnie Brae. It was his personal opinion that it was difficult to negotiate the downhill curves in this area at 30 MPH. Mr. Nielsen told the Committee that the evening rush hour seemed to be when he noticed the most problems. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES October 10, 1989 Page 6 Mrs. Fuhr moved that this item be continued pendinv--a survev by the Enei- neerine Department of the topoeraphy of the roadway and pendine a speed survey to be conducted in more of the immediate area. Mr. Sherman seconded the motion. Motion carried 3 -1. (Mr. Swanson temporarily absent when vote was called). (4) Request to upgrade the intersection of West 56th Street and Brookview Avenue from a 2 -way to a 4 -way "STOP" sign. Petition received from numerous area residents. ACTION TAKEN: Ms. McCarthy began by saying that at present there are "STOP" signs on Brookview Avenue but not on West 56th Street. She has observed that with the present signing, most vehicles roll through the "STOP" or disregard it altogether. Mr. Swanson stated "STOP" signs do not tend to slow traffic, but are meant primarily to establish right of way. Captain Kleven reviewed the accident history at this intersection, and reported two accidents in 1984 and one in 1989. Two were caused by "STOP" sign error and one by failure to yield after stopping. He also stated that no speed surveys had been conducted in this area. Mr. Hoffman moved to recommend heavy coverage by the Traffic Enforcement Unit for "STOP" sizn violators, which was amended by Mr. Swanson to also include a speed survey to be conducted in the area. Mr. Swanson seconded the motion. Motion carried 5 -0. EDINA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE ATTACHMENT 1 DATE TO: CITY OF EDINA MEMORANDUM October 10, 1989 Traffic Safety Committee FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer SUBJECT: Analysis of Speed Surveys Due to continuing concern over the speed of traffic in the community, I did an analysis of three areas for comparison purposes: - Halifax from 51st to 54th - West 54th at Oaklawn - West 70th at Tracy The 85th percentile speed is the speed at which Minnesota Department of Transportation would evaluate the speed zoning for a street. The three street locations are identified as follows: (All are zoned at 30 MPH). Halifax Avenue - residential West 54th Street - low volume collector West 70th Street - high volume collector 85% Percentile Halifax - 1988 30 -31 MPH - 1989 32 MPH West 54th Street - 1989 32 -33 MPH West 70th Street - 1989 36 -39 MPH The effects of the survey would indicate that the first two segments are zoned at 30 MPH properly with the last segment (West 70th Street) probably should be zoned at 35 MPH. My comments are not to be interpreted as advocating a position, simply reporting the information. As you may be aware, the Minneapolis and St. Paul traffic engineers believe the residential street speed ought to be 25 MPH due to normal parking and driving conditions on inner city streets. Traffic experts say 30 mph too fast for city driving By Gregor W. Pinney Stab' Writer On city streets all across Minnesota, cars and trucks and motorcycles are allowed to go 30 miles per hour. It's a state law that's Lccn around for a long time. - But that doesn't impress Mike Mona- han, traffic engineer in Minneapolis, or Don Sobanis, his counterpart in St. Paul. It unnerves them. "1 don't think any vehicle, traveling down a - cjidcntial street, with park- ing on both sides — really, now — 30 isn't safe. That's moving right along," said Monahan. fA.r• W So he wants the Legislature to cut the speed limit to 25. But before that can happen, the Min- neapolis City Council would have to endorse the idea, and it hasn't dis- cussed it yet. Council President Alice Rainville wouldn't predict this week how coun- cil members might react to the idea. Duke Addicks, the city's lobbyist, doubted that it would go very far unless the Minnesota Lergue of Cit- ies got interested in it. And that doesn't seem likely because league staff n ow.bers say nobody in the lengve hz; m: atianed it. "At first look, I'd say that may be Fine for densely populated areas." said Toni Thelcn, league field repre- sentati -c. "But I doubt if the r—al ,ould want :o g^ down to 25." T1 cnly ^uthurity lin ihangirg s^ ^ ^d !;mil in Minnesota :r the r'° D;p7 -1mcnt of Transpoi:ation. The department has a procedure for any city that wants to lu:: a sp °ed limit, and Minneapolis ought to use it, said Thelcn. Minneapolis has used the procedure, said Monahan, but "The mechanism i- ^ ;nly for raising ^!::eds, not low- ering them. " Indeed, the only city streets posted below 30 are those designated park- ways, and that 25 -mph speed was set long ago. A Transportation Department study ;bows that 20 states, including all that touch Minnesota, have 25 -mph limits on residential streets. Fifteen set the limit at 30 and five at 35, and the rest post other speeds. Just about every time Monahan goes out to a neighborhood group meet- ing, h:; said, people complain about traffic ,speeds. "They say cars are speeding. But we run checks out there. and they're going 29 miles an he- and that's legal." Star Tribune /Saturday /September 30 /19ts, 313 w ., o e" 4 ch \,N�bRFOMZOv/ Jsss REPORTIRECOMMENDATION To: Mayor and City Council From: Bob Kojetin, Director Park and Recreation Dept. Date: October 13, 1989 Subject: Braemar Golf Course - League policies for residents and non - residents, one.league part - participation Agenda- Item # VTT . b Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action © Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Mr. Wineberg MOVED THAT WE RECONFIRM THAT AT THE END OF THIS YEAR YOU CAN BELONG TO ONE LEAGUE PLUS YOU CAN PARTICIPATE IN THE COUPLES LEAGUE. Bill Jenkins seconded the motion. Pat Vagnoni opposed. MOTION CARRIED. Jim Fee MOVED THAT WE MAKE A REVISION TO THE 1987 MOTION WHICH ELIMINATED ALL NON- RESIDENTS AND THAT WE RESCIND THAT TO GRANDFATHER IN NON - RESIDNETS THAT ARE CURRENTLY IN LEAGUE PLAY WITH NO LIMITATIONS AS FAR'AS NUMBER OF YEARS. Andrew Montgomery seconded the motion. Mr'. Christianson opposed the motion, because it does discriminate against Edina residents. He also stated that in legue play you are guaranteed a spot where in open play it is based upon a.first come first serve basis. SIX VOTED FOR, ,TAMES FFR, WTT,LIAM LORD, ANDREW MONTGOMERY, MAC THAYER, DONALD WINEBERG, AND PAT VAGNONI. THREE OPPOSED, BOB CHRISTIANSON, BILL JENKINS, AND JEAN RYDELL. MOTION PASSES. Info /Background: This issue was addressed and decided by City Council in 1987. All pertinent information from that time is enclosed. The subject was reintroduced due to a large number of - interest shown to have the motion rescinded, becaus6 of. effective date for the new policy to start January 1, 1990. EDINA PARK BOARD 7:35 p.m. October 10, 1989 Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Bob Christianson, Donald Wineberg, Bill Jenkins, James Fee, William Lord, Andrew Montgomery, Jean Rydell, John Thayer, Pat Vagnoni MEMBERS ABSENT: Scott Johnson STAFF PRESENT: Bob Kojetin, John Valliere, Susan Weigle, John Keprios, Janet Canton OTHERS PRESENT: Eleanor Compton, Hazel Foss, Tass Von Schmidt - Pauli, Millie Delebo, Sylvia Eisler, Luverne Swanson, Marge George, Dean Johnson, Marion Olson, Muriel Johnson, Rosemary Labandz, June Hoyt, Jeanne Swanson, Martha Hilgendorf, Pat Newell, Pat Hatlestad, Lois Clynes, Jewel Lalim, Jean Cutshall, Margorie Loper, Alice Bishop, Georgia Chapman, Harvey Chapman, Colette Bednarczyk, Delphie Clark. Margerie Johnson sitting in for Scott Johnson 1. APPROVAL OF SEPTEMBER MINUTES JIM FEE MOVED TO APPROVE THE SEPTEMBER 12, 1989, MEETING MINUTES. BILL JENKINS SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE Mr. Christianson, Chair for the Park Board, welcomed all of the guests in the audience to the park board meeting. Mr. Kojetin introduced the two immediate questions. a. Non - Residents b. Golf Leagues Mr. Kojetin indicated that both non - residents and the golf league issue had been passed in 1987 and in 1990 both of these policies would become effective starting next spring. Mr. Kojetin indicated to the audience that all correspondence that had been sent to the council, golf course, and park and recreation office was assembled in a packet. Also, included in the packet were past park board and council policies as well as pertinent information to the questions at hand. This packet was then distributed to the park board members. MW Mr. Valliere and Mr. Kojetin assembled a simplified history of the issues. The history of these issues along with the agenda was on the back table for members of the audience to pick up. Mr. Kojetin briefly reviewed the items and then called on John Valliere, Golf Course Manager, to present a more comprehensive view on the historical backgrond of these issues. John Valliere indicated to the audience how much he appreciates the business the leagues have given to Braemar. The problem that exists, however, is there are too many league golfers. There has to be an adjustment made for all of the additional people who want to use the facility. Therefore, we have to constrain the amount of league play. We also have to permit the residents to have more access. With this situation, we needed to go from the women's three leagues to two leagues. From there, we needed to go from the two leagues to the one league.. Mr. Valliere stated he did not advocate the non - residency issue when Braemar moved to the one league situation. It was the fact that it would not be fair for approximately 165 men to be on a waiting list while others enjoyed the two league situation. Then another problem is, should it be done for both genders to make it fair; the park board brought up the non - residency with this. The residents then stated that if they have to surrender their two league privilege, they would want the non - residents to leave first. Thus we have the non - residency problem. Mr. Valliere stated his goal is to offer as many people in our community an opportunity to have access to the golf course on a once a week basis. Mr. Valliere's recommendation is to support the one league per player policy, with the exception of the Couples League. Bob Christianson indicated that the Council in 1987 adopted recommendations from Park Board: 1) persons be allowed in one league only and 2) that non - residents in league play will be phased out at the end of the 1989 season. The policy has been in transition for two playing seasons. When discussion on this decision took place in 1987, there were no plans for expansion of the golf course. There was some discussion on the possibility of moving some league play to the new nine holes. Mr. Lord asked how the new nine hole golf course is coming along and would this pertain to the issues of non - residents and play on only one league. Mr. Kojetin indicated that the Corps of Engineers are still reviewing the nine -hole project at this time. The Corps of Engineers are requesting a portion of land be set aside as undisturbed open space for.wildlife. The city has offered some of the SE corner of the hill as a possibility. If everything goes right within the next 30 days we will probably have play in June of 1991. Mr. Kojetin stated that we will go through the first year observing play because there are so many people who want to play. Then in the fall of 1991 we will make some consideration on league play for the 1992 season. At the present time, the new nine hole course would not be affected by the current policy. Mr. Christianson asked if there is sufficient demand from Edina residents who either are or are not patron card holders that will absorb the entire capacity of the new nine -hole? Mr. Valliere indicated yes, that they now - 2 - have 2,000 patron card holders and the desire for additional rounds are indicated by just the traffic on the present 18. An expansion of another nine will help but it won't alleviate the problem. Mr. Kojetin brought up the point that there are more senior citizens now playing golf. The senior population is now dominating play at Braemar during the daylight time, more so than in the earlier years at the golf course. Mr. Christianson brought up the point that Braemar,does not restrict open play to residents only. Mr. Valliere indicated that most of the time patrons call in and make a reservation and they usually have non - patrons with them. Those non - patrons may or may not be residents. Seventy -one percent of traffic is patron traffic. Twenty -nine percent is non - resident and non - patron. Mr. Valliere explained how Bowling Green League has an unusual set of circumstances. They are the only daytime league on the regulation course with non - residents. Otherwise, evening leagues contain the non - residents. This narrows down the daytime non - residency issue to 36 people. The difficult part is if you make the decision to permit this league, we.are duty bound to defend this to the other non - residents that are not permitted to stay. Mr. Valliere indicated to the audience and the park board that the Bowling Green League has provided very good customers. Mr. Christianson asked if there are waiting lists for the leagues and Mr. Valliere replied that on some women's leagues there are waiting lists. He also indicated that if all of the ladies leagues are not filled at this time it will be utilized by open golf. In the future those times will fill by possibly future residents who want to join those leagues. Mr. Wineberg asked who originally invited the Bowling Green to play at Braemar. A member of the audience replied that Mrs. Cooper and Janet Hyde were playing in the Bowling Green league at the Eden Prairie Golf Course and at that time indicated to their club that they were invited to move their league to Braemar Golf Course. The audience had many remarks on these two topics. There was a request that the women who have been members on two leagues and also the non - residents to still be able to continue as it is and to be grandfathered in. Bill Jenkins stated he has a problem with a resident not being able to play because of a non - resident. It was stated in the audience that they are not taking away anyone's time. They only have a waiting list on Wednesday, otherwise, they are open. Another point brought up by the audience is, that if 28% of the time is for leagues, what percentage is for women's league? The women's league goes off at 7:00 a.m. and the league consists of 40 girls who are not residents and 50 girls who are in two leagues. The audience asked what is the damage that this amount of people is doing? Mr. Valliere indicated that if all of our ladies leagues are gone tomorrow, our golf course would fill in the morning. Right now Friday morning is the only week time from 7:00 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. for open golf. - 3 - Another comment from the audience is that there isn't a woman's league going off after 9:00 a.m. The leagues are off the front tee in a hurry. For 90 of them why can't they have the grandfather clause, take in no more non - residents and let people be in more than one league. Mr. Valliere indicated that the two league issue is his biggest problem. Also, the audience indicated that if it is grandfathered there shouldn't .be a problem since most of the women won't be around for a long time thus the problem will take care of itself. The audience would like it recommended to the Park Board that they have the grandfather clause extended. Another point brought up by the audience was, if we take company groups, within those groups, how many are residents? If we have two companies and there were 40 or 50 people, it was suggested that only 5 might be residents and they are taking up a four and a half to five hour play. Woman's league is going on only one morning. So if it were taken down in count there are more non - residents playing more hours on that course than Bowling Green's 38 girls. Mr. Christianson stated that his problem is not the non - residents percentage of use but, is with all of the residents backed up that cannot get on the golf course. They are the people we represent and we have to balance those concerns. No one answer will please everyone. There was one member of the audience who is on a league at the Executive course, and she indicated there are 32 non - residents in the league out of 160, and they have a waiting list of 27 people. The point was brought up of possibly compromising, where you could be grandfathered in if you are a non - resident who has golfed in the league for five years or more. That would eliminate 17 of our people and that would grandfather all of Bowling Green. No league has taken in non - residents in the last two years. Mr. Valliere indicated. that he could live with that but would still hold fast to a single league. Mr. Montgomery asked how many other non - residents are playing during non - league time. Mr. Valliere said they do not poll those people. Mr. Christianson indicated that the one league policy limits people to one league regardless of gender. The present policy would go into effect the end of this season. Next year, they will be entitled to one league. Mr. Valliere indicated there is the one exception which is the mixed league, because it is a co -rec situation, a player may play on one women's league and one co -rec league. The audience indicated that the men and women should be taken care of separately. They are not equal. Mr. Von Schmidt -Pauli stated that the men's club expanded this year to include men under 45. One can't compare the women with what the men are doing. A Richfield resident stated that Bowling Green is the oldest league in Minnesota and they just had their 50th anniversary and can hardly bear the thought of being broken up now. - 4 - Mr. Von Schmidt -Pauli indicated that all of the groups that come to Braemar, golfers and non - golfers, using the Braemar.Room for activity are put on the Marquis as a welcome to that group. Mr_ Christianson summed up the two issues. The first one is to continue the policy that you can only be on one league with the exception of co -rec league. At the present time, if we do nothing, the policy is effective at the end of this year where you can only play on one league, and you have to choose between your leagues. MR. WINEBERG MOVED THAT WE RECONFIRM THAT AT THE END OF THIS YEAR YOU CAN BELONG TO ONE LEAGUE PLUS YOU CAN PARTICIPATE IN THE COUPLES LEAGUE. BILL JENKINS SECONDED. _PAT VAGNONI - OPPOSED. MOTION CARRIED. The second issue is the termination of league rights of non - residents, which goes into effect the end of this playing season. This is not an issue with the men. All wens' leagues consist of Edina residents only. JIM FEE MOVED THAT WE MAKE A REVISION TO THE 1987 MOTION WHICH ELIMINATED ALL NON- RESIDENTS AND THAT WE RESCIND THAT TO GRANDFATHER IN NON- RESIDENTS THAT ARE CURRENTLY IN LEAGUE PLAY WITH NO LIMITATIONS AS FAR AS NUMBER OF YEARS. ANDREW MONTGOMERY SECONDED Discussion Mr. Christianson opposed the motion, because it does discriminate against Edina residents. He also stated that in league play you are guaranteed a spot where in open play it is based upon a first come first serve basis. SIX VOTED FOR, JAMES FEE, WILLIAM LORD, ANDREW MONTGOMERY, MAC THAYER, DONALD WINEBERG, AND PAT VAGNONI. THREE OPPOSED, BOB CHRISTIANSON, BILL JENKINS,' AND JEAN RYDELL. MOTION PASSES. c. Satellites Mr. Kojetin indicated that there was a request to have a satellite placed out on the north side of Braemar Boulevard on the Executive course. It came from some ladies that play out there, who feel once they get an hour away from the Executive Clubhouse that they can't make it back. Bob Kojetin stated that the restrooms down in the Executive Clubhouse should adequately serve the Executive Course traffic. Once you have a satellite out there, you have to service it and that means you need a truck to come out. What is happening now is they are going behind the trees. Right now there is one satellite on the 18 course, but that is easy to service and that is a much longer course. John Valliere indicated that this executive golf course is one half of a normal nine. Mr. Wineberg felt that if its just one group, there is not enough to go on for this request. Mr. Kojetin indicated there are probably only a half dozen woman involved with this request. - 5 - DONALD WINEBERG MOVED THAT WE REJECT PLACING A SATELLITE ON THE EXECUTIVE COURSE. BILL JENKINS SECONDED. BASED ON STAFF RECOMMENDATION, THERE WILL BE NO SATELLITE. d. Capital Improvements Mr. Kojetin passed out a sheet on capital improvements that are presently being worked on and some that will be done in 1990. Also, there are on going situations on improvements for the golf course. _Bill Jenkins asked how the capital numbers for each year is determined. Mr. Kojetin stated, it is based on what we anticipate our net figure to be and what our cash flow is. We can kind of anticipate somewhere around $75,000.00 beyond our equipment replacement. 3. SENIOR CENTER Mr. Kojetin indicated that congregate dining is not working out at the Community Center. It is due to the catering kitchen. They are not performing or paying the rent and that makes it uncertain. Also, the extremely hot weather brought down the number of people to about 15 a day. Now that it is getting cooler, there are more people, but the uncertainty with the caterer is still there. The Volunteers of America said that if the numbers do not go up to 45 people by December they will have to eliminate the program. Ms. Weigle indicated that now they are averaging about 40 people a day. Mr. Kojetin stated if we lose the congregate dining, they will never come back to the City of Edina again. There is quite a number of cities on the waiting list that would like congregate dining. Mr. Jenkins asked what they were averaging before they came to the Senior Center and Ms. Weigle stated about 100 people. She also pointed out that then they were in a building that had many frail, elderly people that could come down and use the program. Volunteers of America would be happy with 40 to 50 people a day. Ms. Weigle stated that with having so much instability with the catering service, it has gotten to the point they have had to hire a Volunteers of America part -time coordinator to see that the food is prepared in advance so that people who are there can eat. Since the part -time coordinator has started, it has improved. Numbers everywhere seem to go down in the summer. When congregate dining first began at the Community Center more than 500 new people attended the first six months; but because the food was so poor many people didn't come back. Through word of mouth more people are coming back again. Instability of the caterer is the bottom line. We don't know if he will be there two weeks from now. He hasn't paid his bills and most of the time is not there. Mr. Wineberg asked if "Meals on Wheels" is a possibility. Ms. Weigle answered that she would not like to go to this because, first of all, the caterer has to be gone before something else can be done. Mr. Kojetin stated that the concept of "Meals on Wheels" is a different program. The purpose of congregate dining is to provide a social atmosphere as well as food. - 6 - Mr. Jenkins asked why we don't get the caterer out of the congregate dining and Mr. Kojetin indicated that he has a contract with the School District which is in litigation right now, which could take a month or so. The topic was brought up on whether there was air conditioning on the third floor and Ms. Weigle indicated that there was not. If there was air conditioning there for the summer months, Ms. Weigle would have no problem, but she does not want them there year round. Mr. Kojetin indicated they had an overall budget.allocation of $20,000 for air conditioning, he has had two quotes. His feeling is not the air condition but, the uncertainty of the caterer. Mr. Kojetin also suggested reactivating the committee to look into another senior location. He questioned whether there was another location in the SE corner of the city, or even the possibility of renting a facility. The new concept across the country is to put senior centers in shopping malls. Once we establish long range plans it should be located near the tram line for easy transportation. The people who were on the Senior Search Committee are Sue Weigle, Jean Rydell, Mrs. Reed, Glen Smith, and Bob Kelly. Mr. Christianson stated it would be a good idea to reactivate the committee. Ms. Weigle indicated there was good news, there are about 300 new members for the Senior Center. 4. BUDGET Mr. Kojetin indicated the budget has not been approved yet. It will be approved on Monday, October 16. The Council knows the Park Board has approved the fees and charges. 5. WHITE OAKS LOT Mr. Kojetin indicated that the White Oaks Lot has been bought by the City of Edina for $40,000. $20,000 came from the resident and $20,000 came from the city. The closing will be ready and signed within a week. The Grove Street house topic was brought up and Mr. Kojetin stated that the Grove Street property is open space, we removed the house, had a neighborhood party and planted a lot of trees and put in a lot of wild flower mixture, it looks kind of weedy right now. In a prairie grass'area it takes about three years to look good. 6. CORNELIA PARK WALKING PATH Mr. Kojetin indicated that they have just resurfaced the path around Lake Cornelia. In the original path, part of the money came from the State bicycle funds, and we were obligated to have it as a bicycle path and as a walking path. It has been very difficult to have one path for both. We have tried to have bicycles going one way and walkers another, but it just hasn't worked out. One option we could do is leave 66th street for bicycles but have the remaining path for walkers. - 7 - Mr. Kojetin suggested to the park board to use the walking path and see what they think and have this topic be on next months agenda. Mr. Christianson indicated he thought it was dangerous for walking pedestrians and moving pedestrians to be on the same path. 7. ART CENTER Mr. Kojetin indicated the bids came in at $217,000.00 without alternate's, $232,000.00 with soft costs, which made it $32,000 over the budget. We tried to look at cutting way back. The original base bid was $242,000.00, without soft costs and alternates, so it was cut back to $217,000.00 with the add alternate and then tried to, get it to $185,000.00, by gutting the building. All bids have been rejected. Mr. Kojetin indicated he has met with the architect and the low bidder. There.was discussion on where some cost cutting could come in to play. One major item that came up, is the second room that has a 14 foot and a 9 foot ceiling. Bringing both ceilings to 9 feet would save quite a bit as well as some other modifications with the roof structure, and materials. We are rebidding and open the second week of November. Awarding on the third Monday in November is what is now scheduled. 8. JUPITER AND BEYOND Mr. Kojetin reminded the board about the joint park board council meeting scheduled for. December 18, 1989. He indicated that we should look totally at our program at the November meeting. Mr. Christianson indicated that each committee needs to have a rough draft of their report at the November meeting. On the agenda we should have the "Jupiter and Beyond" reports. 9. BRAEMAR ARENA ROOM Mr. Kojetin indicated there has been some discussion on finishing the lower room at the arena by two clubs. Mr. Thayer has been in close contact with these two clubs. Mr. Keprios gave further insight on the proposal and discussed how the lower room under the office area has not been finished. The Hockey Association (with assistance from the hockey moms) would like to see the room developed into a social gathering room. The Figure Skating Club would ideally prefer extra amenities to accommodate other activities such as dance, exercise etc. However, the Figure Skating Club has not yet decided upon a plan. The two clubs have met with the architect who has drawn up the design of how to redo the room very simply. Put new walls around, ceiling, lights, carpeting, place at one end a counter, have a storage area, and also have a second exit door going into the hallway or into the tunnel area. The cost would be around $30,000.00, which each club could put $15,000.00 into it. The groups could pay it off in a 3 year period. Mr. Christianson indicated that the only place we can get the money from we have already taken money from twice: for the lights at Van Valkenberg ballfields and the art center. Mr. Wineberg stated that there is one point that is different and that is they will pay it back. - 8 - Mr. Keprios indicated that timing is important for the figure skaters but not so much for the hockey players. The figure skaters are having some major competitions out there, the Midwest Figure Skating and the Great Lakes Regional. Mr. Christianson asked how much these groups could come up with now. Mr. Keprios indicated he thought around $5,000.00 each. It was questioned whether they could go to First Edina to borrow the money. Mr. Keprios replied that the two organizations prefer a request to the City for a non - interest bearing note to make it more affordable. The dollar figure is not to exceed $20,000.00. Bob Kojetin and Bob Christianson will go before the council on this topic. BILL LORD MOVED TO PURSUE THE NON- INTEREST BEARING NOTE TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR $20,000.00, AND THAT EACH CLUB CONTRIBUTE $5,000.00 WITH A PAY BACK IN THREE YEARS. MR. WINEBERG SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED. 10. OTHER Mr. Keprios is going to San Antonio for the National Park and Recreation Conference. Ms. Vagnoni asked about National Park Month, if we are doing anything. Mr. Kojetin indicated that generally the Girl Scouts and Boy Scouts go out and clean up the parks. It's a tradition for them. Also, the Lions Club has shown an interest in this. Ms. Rydell indicated that she had heard that it costs $1,500.00 in order to use a field to have a soccer tournament. Mr. Kojetin indicated that if it's private it could be, but that the Soccer Association has a set policy and it's not $1,500.00. Mr. MacHolda could answer any further questions on this topic. Mr. Keprios indicated that a contract for Van Valkenburg Park has been agreed upon. Also, three scoreboards and a pop dispenser will be donated by Coca -Cola as long as we buy their product for the next seven years. The lighting, scoreboard, and public address system, on the first bid was rejected. The new bid opening will be November 1, for just lights. Hopefully they will be low enough. The low bid was $123,460.00 for just the lights and wood poles. We budgeted $130,000.00. 11. ADJOURNMENT ' DONALD WINEBERG MOVED TO ADJOURN AT 9:40 P.M. BILL JENKINS SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED. - 9 - BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE PROJECTED UPDATE 189 Completion of the final drawings for the new nine holes and, after the bid process, commence construction. 189 Upgrade the old clubhouse and Pro Shop for energy efficiency by insulating and replacing the cedar shakes. '89 Revamp present parking -lot and provide badly needed lighting for evening events. 189 -190 Upgrade the dome with a larger heating plant and enlarge the front portion of the existing main building by 12 feet. This will provide space for an office and a needed foyer for heater efficiency. 189 -'90 Install a higher fence on the West end of driving range to insure safety for persons playing the first nine of the regulation course. 190 Add to the present maintenance building to accommodate added equipment for the new nine and provide overflow golf car storage. 190 Continue to install new "Tee Oasis" and rebuild at least four tees per year. 190 Expand the lesson tee area on the North end of the driving range. 190 Expand the golf car fleet from 40 to 50 cars. Ongoing Institute a program for pond and stream clarity. Plan a Pro Shop expansion to include more floor space and needed administrative offices. Implement a strong course flower program and clubhouse grounds beautification program. Purchase a piano with Memorial Fund monies (Balance presently at $4,300.00). Continue to replace golf course maintenance equipment. ($50,000.00 for 1990). Upgrade the Dome lighting system. Continue a strong tree planting program. One League Membership Policy and the Non - Resident Issue at Braemar Golf Course HISTORY 1976 John Valliere, Course Manager, acting alone, changed policy.on multi- league memberships. Action: Reduced ladies league membership to a two league maximum. Rationale: To allow additional persons an opportunity to play in league play. 1984 John Valliere, acting alone, instituted a grandfather clause on non- residents and informed all leagues that all new members must be Edina residents. Readily accepted. 1986 John Valliere, in conjuction with the Braemar Golf Committee (a committee formed to help advise on clubhouse construction and other matters) recommended action to reduce all league memberships to one only. Rationale: The increased waiting list for the Braemar Men's Club had grown past the 100 mark. Many Golden Age league members (men) were also in the Braemar Men's Club. The decision for a one league policy would and should provide for more residents to participate in organized competitive golf. Some ladies leagues, but not all, had a waiting list. The thought then surfaced that if this one league action were taken for men, that it should be effective for ladies also. This action would then be equitable according to gender and head off a potential problem. The committee and management agreed. The issue was then brought before the Park Board by some very concerned ladies. Their concern was, and still is, is this: "Before I have to step out of my second league, please ask all.non- residents to leave first ". The two other sides of this issue are as follows: 1. Does the non - resident rule extend to the Executive course. (The real crunch has to date been mostly on the Main course.) However, the Executive course is becoming increasingly popular and does serve as an overflow when the main course is unavailable. 2. The Bowling Green Golf League was invited to come to Braemar' in 1965, when traffic was considerably lighter and they have been good customers all of these years. It is the oldest ladies league in the state of Minnesota. They, incidentally, are the only morning league on the main course with non - residents in it. 1987 The volatile and emotional issues were brought to the council level with recommendations from the Park Board to do the following: 1. All league memberships (both courses, men's and ladies) shall be reduced to one league. 2. All non - residents shall leave. Both of these edicts are to become effective in 1990. This was a compromise to allow the leagues to adjust during the ensuing time span. This was per Park Board meeting, October 13, 1987 and City Council action dated November 2, 1987. At the decision time, no consideration had been given to an additional new nine holes of golf. rl Positions: Council: as stated above. Park Board: in harmony with the council. Braemar Golf Association: non - residents with 15 or i.e. "Grandmothered" as a help of those few women. on June 20 to concur with the original position was to allow pore years of league membership to remain recognition of the long service and Position was reversed by a 6 -2 vote and support existing Council position. Staff: In harmony with council, park board and golf association. Exceptions: 1. Allow Executive course non - residents to remain for one additional year. Rationale: These leagues were displaced during construction (1986 -87) and were promised a returning position after completion of construction. 2. Feel that non - residents in Bowling Green should remain, as the single exception to the rule. This position is not defensible so acquiesce to the Council and Park Board's decision. Summary and considerations: The major concern and rationale for these actions was based on the growing demand to accommodate the residents of our community. The growth continues with some 100 more patron cards sold in 1989 over 1988. The number is approaching 2000. The course must strike a balance between open golf and organized league play. (Currently 28% league play and 72% open play.) League play provides social and competitive comraderie. I have attached an analysis of league play memberships. This report is an attempt to update the,present council of what has taken place and why. As the deadline approaches, emotions one again have surfaced. The golf course management can live with the original decision or its more up to date consideration, i.e. the new nine hole course to be built. However management and majority of golfers strongly agree with the one league policy. Please also be advised that a steady reduction of industrial leagues has transpired from a high of twelve to the present number of two, both of which will leave at the close of the 1989 golfing season. Some consideration should be given to the mobility of the game of golf. In other words, our residents presently play other golf courses and are members of other Minneapolis course leagues. Are we in fact building walls for Edina residents? The golf course management advances this report so that all of the information is condensed and so that you may make an informed decision or reaffirm the former one. I apologize that this matter reached council level, but as you well know, certain items can be emotional and citizens will elevate the level during the appeal process. Thank yo e/ ohn Valliere October 4, 1989 SUMMARY OF BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE ISSUES BEFORE THE EDINA PARK BOARD AND THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL In 1987 the Edina City Council adopted the following policy regarding the Braemar Golf Course: Effective for the 1990 golf season and thereafter no non - Edina residents shall be permitted in the organized Golf Leagues. Similarly, no Edina resident shall be per jitted membership in more than a single organized league. New league members accepted by a league between the adoption of this policy and its enforcement in 1990 shall be Edina residents and shall not be members of any other league organized at the Braemar Golf Course. In addition, the Golf Course Manager was to establish membership limits for each league. The .- two -year interim between the adoption of this policy and the beginning of the 1990 season was for the express purpose of allowing affected individuals ample time to prepare for the impact of the policy in 1990. In the Spring of 1989 the City Council directed the Park Board, the Parks and Recreation Department, the Course Manager and the newly formed Braemar Golf Association to "revisit" the issues and report back to the Council. The Park Board and the Council members have been appraised of the detailed history underlying these issues and of at least some of the emotions aroused within the leagues and their members in earlier reports and correspondence and in the documents that accompany this report. This report, prepared by the Course Manager, presents the decision options available to the Council as it revisits the 1987 policy decision. The options are presented without a specific recommendation for adoption by the Manager or his staff.. Any of the options, or combination thereof, are both acceptable and implementable by the course management. It is imperative, however, that a decision be made soon so that the officers of the organized leagues can proceed with their league's planning for the 1990 season. ' An organized golf league at Braemar is a league that has an assigned block of tee times for its league play on a particular day of the week and which permits play only by its members or authorized guests for special events. ` Two exceptions to this policy are presently in effect. At the 18 -hole course Edina residents may belong to the Mixed League as well as a single Men's or women's League. At the 9 -hole Executive course qualified handicap persons may belong to the Sister Kenny League - whether Edina residents or not. There are seven perceived alternative Options and each is described below. Following these descriptions is a "statistical table which summarizes the impact of each Option in terms of individual_ tee times made available by the adoption of a specific Option. OPTION 1. Reaffirm the 1987 Council Policy Ramification: on the 18 -hole course a total of 49 additional individual tee times will be released from Men's league play; 157 from women's league play; and, 48 from removal of the entire Hennepin County and National Car industrial leagues. OPTION 2. Eliminate all non -Edina Residents from league play on the 18 -hole Course Ramification: A total of 81 individual tee times from gender - specific leagues and 48 from the two industrial leagues will be released. OPTION 3. Eliminate all non -Edina Residents from league play on the 9 -hole Executive Course. Ramification: A total of 89 individual tee times will be released. OPTION 4. Enforce single league only membership on the 18 -hole course Ramification: A total of 125 individual tee times will be released. OPTION 5. Enforce single league only membership on the 9 -hole Executive course Ramification, A total of it individual tee times will be released. 3 It should be understood that an "individual tee time" represents only one position of the total of four positions in a normal foursome and that the days of the week, the time of day of the tee time and the location of the on the 18 -Hole Course or the Executive Course will vary depending on the option(s) selected. 9 These two industrial leagues have been informed that they may not play at Braemar in 1990. They have accepted that decision gracefully and reversal of that action is not warranted although it probably would be gratefully accepted by one of both of these groups. OPTION 6. Eliminate only the two industrial leagues. Ramification: A total of 48 individual tee times will be released. OPTION 7. Reaffirm the elimination of the two industrial leagues and allow a continuation of the interim rules in the Men's and Women's Leagues until the new 9 -hole course i5 open for play. Re- review the policy at that time. Ramification: All new league members would have to be Edina Residents and could be a member of only one league regardless of .on what course the league plays. Current, 1989 season, league members in good standing would be allowed to ?ontinue their current membership regardless of plaG.e-- of residence. Individuals who are currently members of two leagues would be allowed to continue that membership provided that they did not move from one of those two leagues to membership in another Edina league. Leagues that are presently above their membership maximums would be allowed no new members until those limits had been reached through attrition of current members. 5 It should be noted that an individual league member who is a current Edina resident and who moves to a residence outside of Edina would be dropped from league membership at the end of the then current golfing season. SUMMARY TABLE OF RESULTANT INDIVIDUAL TEE TIMES RELEASED UNDER VARIOUS AVAILABLE OPTIONS OPTION On 18 - Hole Course On Executive Course 18 -hole times 9 -hole times 9 -hole times Option 1. 90 164 100 (187 Policy) (34 men, (15 men, (All 56 women) 101 women, 48 women) from Ind. Lgs) Option 2. 18 63 (No non -res, (All (All 18 -Hole) Women) Women) Option 3. 0 ; 0 (No non -res, Exec course) Option 4. 72 53 (1 lge only, (34 men, (15 men, 18 -Hole) 38 women) 38 women) Option 5. 0 0 (1 lge only, Exec course) Option 6. 0 48 (No ind. leagues) Option 7. ?7 48 (Current interim policy continued) N 89 (All Women) 0 11 (All Women) F 08 6 If Option 1. is not reaffirmed, any combination of Options 2 through 6 could be adopted. The net results on the total numbers of individual tee times released would be additive. 7 The numbers of individual tee times released on the 18 -hole course is not measurable. It will be equal to the numbers of non- resident current members who leave their league(s.) and whose current leagues are presently over their membership caps. 8 None of the Executive course leagues are at their membership limits. Elimination of non - resident membership will provide additional opportunities for resident membership but will not necessarily release individual tee times. BRAEMAR LEAGUE ANALYSIS 24 18. Hennepin County(" " " ) 24 Ladies 16 Men's �.. League: Present Allowed Nbi- Resi�dim Braemar Monday 38 38 1 Highlanders 53 48 1 Braemar Ladies Twilight 30 32 10 Tuesday Clubbers 31 31 0 Edina Women 108 108 0 Edina Newcomers 24 24 0 Westwood Women 24 24 18 Braemar Women (18) 85 85 0 Braemar Women (9) 55 48 0 Bowling Green 106 108 36 Mixed (Not included in Men's 108 110 20 or Women's Counts) Industrial National Car (1989 is last year) 24 24 18. Hennepin County(" " " ) 24 24 16 Men's 160 120 35 Golden Agers 120 120 0 Braemar Men's Club 325 325 0 Executive Course Golden Girls 41 60 0 Sister Kenney (HCP) 16 16 12 Par -3 Swingers 160 120 35 Newcomers 20 24 0 Sunshine Gals 60 64 26 Golf Bags (1989 is last year) 30 30 26 Notes: There are 87 duplications in the Ladies' Leagues; 49 in Mens' Present number of ladies on regulation course: 554 (467) Present number of men on regulation course: 445 (396) Industrial Men's League members: 48; Industrial Women: 0 Total ladies in league.play on Executive Course: 319 Total men in league play on Executive Course: 8 Grand total of ladies in league play on both courses: 927 Grand total of men in league play on both courses: 501 Total Men on waiting lists: 183 Total Women on waiting lists: 115* * There is no waiting list for any Executive Course League. October 4, 1989 To: Braemar Golf Association Board . From: John Valliere, BGC Manager Re: "Outside" groups playing at Braemar In response to a question raised by a member of your board about the numbers of golfers playing in "outside" groups at the Braemar Golf Course I offer the following information: 1. As a matter of policy (From Memorial Day through Labor Day) we permit no more than an average of a total of 100 golfers in such groups per week of play. That represents only 3.7 percent.of the 2688 golfing tee times available (based on 8 tee times per hour, 12 hours per day and 4 golfers per tee time). 2. We took the month of July, 1989 and, from our records, have established that a total of 324 such "outside" golfers played that month in a total of 13 different groups. That is an average of 73 golfers per week; only 73 percent of our allowable average. 3. In fact, we recorded an actual total of 13,084 rounds during July, 1989 so that the percentage actually drops to 2.5 percent, only 2 /3rds of the allowable total under our current policy. 4. In addition, many of our "outside" groups are scheduled at the request of Braemar patrons and, in addition, are often composed at least in part of Edina residents and /or Patron Card holders. 5. A part of what appears to be a misconception about the numbers of "outside" golfers probably stems from the announcements that appear on the Course Marquee sign from day to day. A large percentage of these announcements pertain to non - golfing use of our clubhouse facilities. We place these announcements as a coutesy to the groups using the facility. If you have further questions please let me know. /4 7�& Mr. MacHolda received nothing but compliments on the T -Ball Coordinator, Clare Hohman, and the program itself. This year the participants received a certificate and a pennant. There were about 60 more kids than last year. VI. OTHER - GOLF COMMITTEE PROPOSAL Mrs. Lonsbury received letters on a decision made by the Braemar Golf Committee at their April meeting. Mr. Kojetin read the new rules the Committee recommended. "1) In 1988, individuals may be members of only one golf league on the regulation course. An exception to this rule will be the Couples League on Friday nights. "2) During 1987, 1988, and 1989, an individual may be a member of one additional league on the Executive Course. In 1990, a choice must be made so that membership will be in only one league at Braemar." The audience and other golf league members request a change in the new rules. John Valliere said if there is all this complaining, we could have a situation like Dwan Golf Course. They had this problem and to solve it, the Council eliminated ALL leagues except one men's, one women's, and one couples'. Mr. Valliere does not want this to happen at Braemar. New residents should not have to wait their turn to play in leagues. John Valliere moves to allow more people a chance to play in leagues. If this rule were in effect, it would provide 130 additional league members without disrupting open golf. Don Wineberg, a member of the Golf Committee, said they are looking for a way to make the opportunity for Edina residents that want to play league golf as soon as possible. There was no other way that they knew of to do this. So the only way this could be done is to allow everyone to play in one league. It is not fair for some people to be in several leagues while others have to wait to be in one. Mrs. Sylvia Eisler, Bowling Green and Braemar - Monday, requested for her group, Bowling Green, to be recognized as league supporters who helped build up the Golf Course. She believes the problems Braemar is experiencing now will work themselves out down the road since members of her group will only be golfing for a few more years. There are openings in some of the women's leagues. Mrs. Eisler said they want more people to join them. Mr. Wineberg said the Golf Committee was under the impression that there are no openings in the leagues. He stated the new residents who want to join are not asking to have the same privileges as the long time residents. They just want the opportunity to join leagues as soon as possible and not have to wait for years to play league golf. The Committee is trying to take problems that are confronting the community and take care of them now. We want to make the facility available to more individuals that don't have the opportunity now. Mr. John Hoyt, Braemar Men's Club, stated his personal opinion, not that of the whole Men's Club. He thinks that what the leagues are asking for is reasonable. They will be happy to move out of the duplicate leagues as soon as the industrial leagues are eliminated. Mr. Valliere stated there are 165 men now waiting to get into the Men's Club. The waiting period is approximately three to five years. c 1 T v z N In f, A member of the audience asked why can't another club be formed for all the men waiting'for the Men's Club? Mr. Valliere said there has to be time for those who don't want to play in a league. Creating another league would take away from this time. Mrs. Lonsbury stated that Braemar is a public golf course. Any Edina taxpayer has a right to play. A member of the audience said she is unable to play 18 holes of golf at one time. She feels it is discriminating against the 9 -hole players that they can only be in one league. She feels that members of 9 -hole leagues should be able to play in two leagues since they will-be ending up playing the same number of holes. Mr. Wineberg stated that golf is an 18 -hole game. He also stated there is a group not represented at this meeting that doesn't have a lobby and wants to play as much as the people here tonight but can't because of the waiting lists. Are we going to turn our backs and deny them that privilege? Mr. Valliere said from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. Braemar offers 18 hole golf. Prior to 9 a.m. and during league play, Braemar offers 9,hole golf. A member of the audience agreed with Mr. Valliere. She feels strongly that people should be happy to belong in one league and can play.all the golf they want during the open times. Mrs. Lonsbury was surprised to receive the letter from the Men's Club with a City seal on it. A member of the audience said the club has taken action to correct this. Bill Lord stated the Golf Committee consists of men's and women's club members. We have all had their input; as a park board, we have to heed their decisions and abide by their opinions. We have to stand behind the Golf Committee and John Valliere unless they are violently wrong; we believe in these people. Mr. Thayer and Mr. Fee agreed with Mr. Lord. Mr. Fee stated Edina Country Club had to adjust also. They now only allow members to play in one league. Mrs. Rydell' also agreed with Mr. Lord. Mr. Christianson asked if doing away with the industrial leagues would open it up to more citizens. He also stated that a Council member recommends to do away with all leagues. The audience asked questions about the Golf Committee. Mr. Kojetin explained it is an ad hoc committee and only meets when there is a special topic of concern. Mr. Valliere stated the Golf Committee is appointed by the Park Board and not elected. The majority of the committee is made up of league golfers. Actually the committee should have more representation from non - league members. Not every league is represented. There was a discussion on the resident versus non - resident issue. Mrs. Lonsbury stated this issue would have to be discussed at another time. - 4 - Mr. Christianson MOVED TO ACCEPT THE GOLF COMMITTEE'S APRIL 20, RECOMMENDATIONS. Mr. Fee seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. EDINA PARK BOARD 7:30 p.m. August 11, 1987 Edina City Hall MEMBERS PRESENT: Joan Lonsbury, Don Wineberg, Marilyn Wooldridge, Jean Rydell, Mac Thayer, Jim Fee, Bill Lord, Bob Christianson MEMBERS ABSENT: Andrew Montgomery, James MQe STAFF PRESENT: Bob Kojetin, John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Stacey Kness, John Valliere OTHERS PRESENT: Seventeen members of men's and women's golf leagues at Braemar Golf Course GUEST LIST Edina Park Board August 11, 1987 - 6 - NAME LEAGUE(S) 1. Jo Omestad Bowling Green & Highlanders 2. Sylvia Eisler Bowling Green & Braemar - Monday 3. June Hoyt Bowling Green & Highlanders & Couples 4. John Hoyt Braemar Men's Club & Couples 5. Millie Delebo Bowling Green 6. Alice Woods Highlanders 7. Fern Finer Highlanders 8. Bettye McClain Braemar-Monday & Couples 9. Bill McClain Golden Agers & Couples 10. Priscilla Barott Highlanders 11. Martha Hilgendorf Bowling Green 12. Roxy Molzahn Bowling Green & Braemar Women's Club (18) 13. Georgia Chapman Bowling Green & Westwood -Women 14. Harvey Chapman 15. Lois Clynes Bowling Green & Edina Women's Golf Association 16. Mary Schmelz Bowling Green & Edina Women's Golf Association 17. Jewel Lalim Bowling Green & Edina Women's Golf Association - 6 - WHEREAS, Hennepin County has submitted for Council approval a revised Construction Cooperative Agreement No. 43- 11 787, County State Aid Highway 28, Hennepin County Project 8529 for the above named project; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, does approve Construction Cooperative Agreement No. 43- 11 -87, subject to the condition that the City's share of the cost of the project be funded from r� municipal State Aid funds; t� BE IT FURTHER. RESOLVED, that the Mayor and Manager are hereby directed and authorized to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Turner, Courtney yi Resolution adopted. 4 j� PARK & RECREATION TASK FORCE MEMBERS DISCUSSED. Manager Rosland recalled that an J element of the 1987 -1988 Strategic Work Plan is the establishment of a task force to review the City's Park and Recreation facilities and programs. This task force is to be comprised of three Park Board members and eight citizens - two from each quadrant of the City. He suggested that the Council members submit names of individuals for the task force so that appointment could be accomplished at the meeting of November 2. Absent members will be advised and asked to also submit �. names and the matter will be placed on the Council Agenda for November 2, 1987. PARK BOARD RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING BRAEMAR GOLF LEAGUE POLICIES DISCUSSED: CONTINUED TO 11/2/87. Manager Rosland directed the Council's attention to the IN% recommendation of the Park Board as stated in their minutes of October 13, 1987 that the Council accept the "City of Edina Park and Recreation Department Proposed ll Braemar Golf League Policies" as presented at their meeting. The policies are proposed in order to facilitate the growing demands of residents wanting to participate in league play and still give adequate numbers of open golf time. It i is recommended that the proposed new policies be started with the 1990 season which would give adequate time for affected leagues and golfers to make �J adjustments in their membership and rules. Basically, the policies are: 1) All IQJ golf league members must be residents; present non - residents may continue through 1989; 2) Beginning with 1990, all league members are limited to only one league or division; 3) All league membership shall be capped at present limitations, 4) It may become necessary to adjust day of play and /or starting times; and 5) Beginning with 1990, the National Car Rental, Hennepin County and Singles leagues will be eliminated. Manager Rosland suggested that the golf league policies be publicized in the Edina Sun - Current prior to Council action to avoid criticism that golfers �' did not know this was proposed. Member Turner commented that this matter should be held until the meeting of November 2, 1987. It was informally agreed to continue the matter to the Council meeting of November 2, 1987. NO ACTION TAKEN ON TAX - FORFEITED LANDS LIST 705 -NC. Manager Rosland called to the attention of the Council a list of tax - forfeited Lands (List 705 -NC) received from Hennepin County with the request that the Council take action to approve the parcels for public auction, auction to adjacent owners or request a conveyance to the City for public use. He presented the following data on the parcels: 1) 06- 116 -21 -21 -0005 - Bradley Investment Co. - repurchase amount of $228,449.41 of which $201,075.98 represents special assessments; 2)• 06- 116 -21 -21 -0006 - Edina Lodge No. 343 - repurchase amount of $55,758.66 of which $52,060.49 represents special assessments with interest, 3) 33- 117 -21 -22 -0086 - Robert T. Schmidt - single family lot, and 4) 19- 028 -24 -32 -0009 - State Land Dept. - small strip of land adjacent to a developed lot. Manager Rosland said that with regard to the two parcels on which there are unpaid special assessments the concern is that if the parcels are auctioned the City may not recover the special assessments. There is no apparent need by the City for conveyance for public use. The recommendation of staff is that the City take no action on these parcels at this time. The Council has a ninety day period from October 9, 1987 to act and by taking no action it leaves the door open for potential development. No formal action was taken. ..... ... -.__ ... _... ,....... .. n.. t.••..•r.••..••n• +... .•nn +. '. + r c •• +•� •. ... non .._.. _ __ _r_ v__�. __ than three days from the date of said meeting, and to mail notice to all affected properties in substantially the following form: (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING GRADING & R.O.W. IMPROVEMENT NO. P -C -145 PERMANENT STREET SURFACING IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -279 The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall on Monday, November 2, 1987 at 7:00 p.m. to consider the following proposed improvements to be constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. The approximate cost of said improvements are estimated by the City as set forth below: GRADING & R.O.W. IMPROVEMENT NO. C -145 PERMANENT STREET SURFACING IMPROVEMENT NO. The projects are proposed to be funded by State Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. ESTIMATED COST .$273,352.58 BA -279 $436,726.92 Aid Gas Tax Funds. Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk CONDOLENCES EXPRESSED TO ASSISTANT MANAGER. Manager Rosland informed the Council of the death of the father -in -law of Gordon Hughes, Assistant Manager. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Kelly expressing condolences to Gordon Hughes, on behalf of the Council, on the death of his father -in -law, Marvin Teigert. Motion carried unanimously. AMENDMENT TO JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR CDBG PROGRAM APPROVED. Planner Craig Larsen advised that a request was received from Hennepin County for action by the Council on an amendment to the Joint Cooperation Agreement with the county for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. He explained that the agreement regulates the administration of the program with Hennepin County under the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Recently, HUD.has made some language changes to which the county must respond. The amendment basically does the following: a) defines the term "Metropolitan City ", b) satisfies assurance that the Agreement will be effective for however long it takes to expend granted funds, c) satisfies that all participants are bound by the required certification of compliance, d) satisfies requirements relative to program income, and e) satisfies the requirement of setting forth standards applicable to activities of real property acquisition or improvement. Staff would recommend approval of the amendment. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Turner for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City of Edina, Minnesota and the County of Hennepin have executed a Joint Cooperation Agreement, County Contract No. 70467, for the purposes of qualifying as an Urban County under the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Development Block Grant program for Fiscal Years 1988, 1989 and 1990; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Amendment No. 1 to the Joint Cooperation Agreement, County Contract No. 70467 be approved, and that the Mayor and the Manager be authorized to sign Amendment No. 1 on behalf of the City. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. *CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Kelly to approve payment of the following claims as per pre -list dated 10/19/87: General Fund $339,889.89, Art Center $11,783.98, Swimming Pool Fund $1.30, Golf Course Fund *17 A47 F1 Rorroatinn rantOT vi nA Al - R9R . 1 5 . Cim Ranac- F1TnA S1 - 596.75. y A I f Af b/ re--s D tc-, VrVy6_ 117--6 .y LETTER FROM "SUNSHINE GALS GOLF LEAGUE REFERRED TO STAFF AND PARR BOARD Mayor Richards referred to a letter dated June 6, 1989 from Bernice Schultz, President of the "Sunshine Gals" golf league asking that the Edina City Council reconsider its policy to limit membership in Braemar golf leagues to Edina residents only, effective in 1990. The letter suggested that current members of the league not be terminated and that the restriction of Edina resident apply , new me Over time, through attrition, the goal of Edina residency wouldlbetachievedmbers. The Council discussed having the present policy reviewed and the possibilit y of grandfathering in current golf league members who are not residents. Parks and Recreation Director Kojetin said that the Park Board and the Braemar Golf Association were aware of the letter and had discussed it. It agreed by the Council that the current policy adopted in Novembers ofn1987abey revisited by the Park Board, Park and Recreation staff, Braemar staff, the Braemar Golf Association and all the golf leagues concerning the residency requirement. 'HEARING DATE SET - STREET VACATION - EDINBOROU was . Kelly with a second by Member Rice to adopt the followingtResolutionde b y Hember RESOLUTION CALLING PUBLIC HEARING ON BE IT RESOLVED by the VCity 2 Council EASEMENT a City of STREET dinaa,Henne Minnesota, as follows: pin County, 1• It is hereby found and determined that the following described easement for street purposes should be considered for vacation, in provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 412.851 and accordan with the All that part of EDINRORnnr_u L,.o _ _ ;t Page No. 09/22/89 PRIORITY LISTING OF BMC WAITING LIST APPLICANTS BY RANK ORDER OR ALPHABETLCAL ORDER POS APPLICANT NAME HOMEPI-ON OFF.PHON APPL.DATE BIRTHDAY COMMENTS 52 ADAMS, ALLAN W. 929 -2340 06/13/87 15 ALLUM, CHAS. E. 941 -9546 06/03/86 / / DELAY TO 1/90 112 ANDERSON, TODD G. 941 -2072 12/15/86 78 ANDERSON, TODD P. 926 -4918 924 -2621 01/17/88 110 BARON, GREGORY L. 929 -4123 624 -5677 12/10/88 106 BASSINGER, FRED W. 941 -2126 10%07/88 158 BATTAGLIA, ANTHONY 929 -9138 927 -4631 05/31/89 06/15/28 102 BEARD'SLEY, WILLIAM L. 941 -5593 372 -3061 07/09/88 :166 BECK, ROBERT 936 -2169 931 -6919 07/22/89 04/29/41 137 BENNEN, MIKE 925 -3319 925 -3319 04/14/89 11/28/62 68 BERG, WALLACE 10%16/87 ! / 57 BERGMAN, JOHN 941 -0979 339 -4843 07/21/87 / 81 BISHOP, NORMAN J. 941 -2268 591 -0821 01/29/88 94 BJERKEN, MAURICE R. 922 -0406 729 -7329 05/26/88 149 BLUMER, STEPHEN F. 830 -1252 835 -3300 05/12/89 09/04/52 1165 BOCHE, LES 835 -5573 07/17/89 05/10/19 ;113 BONNER, PAUL S. 927 -5027 690 -1751 12/22/88 / / #11 12/22/89 ;•160 BOOS, FRED 920 -4466 06/06/89 08/02/33 14 BOYSEN, WAYNE 941 -5932 09/17/87 3 BRIMACOMB, JERRY 941 -5860 941 -5860 06/04/85 % / DELAY TO 1/90 "105 BROCKWELL, IAN 938 -8244 09/02/88 :147 BROPHY, JAMES P. 922 -7081 927 -2567 05/01/89 04/15/54 4 BROWN, CHARLIE 920 -2456 870 -2173 06/07/85 / / DELAY TO 1/90 1171 BRUNEAU, MICHAEL L. 920 -1384 942 -6067 08/10/89 04/16/51 `` 13 CADWELL, TED C. 927 -7483 931 -7096 04/15/86 / / DELAY TO 1/90 0115 CARD, WILLIAM H. 929 - 3305 332 -5569 01118/89 1,87 CARNEY, JIM 941 -1518 04/09/88 173 CHRISTENSEN, C. B. 935 -3052 931 -5648 08%18/89 03/30/25 ``126 CHRISTMAN, ALAN M. 944 -8199 941 -8342 03/28/89 05/17/34 ':100 CLAPP, STEVE 926 -6254 835-6585 07/03/88 7 COLE, GEORGE H. 920 -7861 01/02/86 / / DELAY TO 1/90 93 CORRIVEAU, JAMES P. 941 -3590 696 -0689 05/21/88 '`134 CUMMINGS, KIMBALL 926 -3234 542 -3513 04/12/89 / J 38 DAHLSTROM, DONALD 941 -6276 922 -5809 03/02/87 177 DAMMICCI, ANTHONY E. 926-6744 887 -5256 09/16/89 03/20/32 .69 DEVEREAU, SOB 944 -65310 10/21%87 :163 DOBESH, GREG 924 -0639 831-2432 07/01/89 10/10/55 157 DOLBEC, EARL 941 -1856 05/31/89 03/22/23 152 DOMHOLT, PAUL 929 -6891 348 -4448 05/16•x89 03/29/5 -121 DORNSEIF, DAN 831 -6268 941 -2072 03/15/39 04/25/54 9 DRAXLER, DAVE 835- 2075 291 -5297 04%01/86 / DELAY TO 1/90 109 DRILL, FREDERICK E. 929 -5432 927 -4525 12/02/88 � 70 DUBOW, IRVINE 835 -2101 11;- 107/87 108 DUCAR, MICHAEL 920 -4551 372 -3152 10/28/88 / A 3 EATON, MARK 922 -8816 870 -2521 04%10/89 10/11/56 .7 EISENBERG, STAN 941 -4913 546 -5306 11/14/86 104 ENGH, RAY J. 941-7497 733 -5242 08/15/88 04/24/41 172 ERICKSON, THOMAS S. 922 -9106 340 -2659 08/17/89 04/14/32 22 ERICKSON, WM. (BILL) 926 -5311 09/04/86 i / Page No. 2 09/22/89 POS APPLICANT NAME 143 FAVARO, BOB 145 FEDDEMA, JOHN A. 82 FIEDLER, DANIEL J. 77 FOLDENAUR, JIM 97 FORNELL, WILLARD 40 FOURNIER, TOM 116 GAMER, RCS! 51 GILBERTSON, DON 55 GOEBLEL, RALPH 146 HAGGERTY, DANIEL 8 HALL, CLAYTON 29 HANSON, HAROLD 99 HARTNETT, JAS. A. 150 HARTWIGSEN, CURT 35 HATLESTAD, DAVID C.' 161 HEEGARD, ROGER 120 HELLBUSCH, JON 58 HERGOTT, DAN '4 HOGAN, THOMAS ,4 HOKANSON, ROBERT V. 127 HOLMQUIST, R. E. 37 HOUSH, ALLEN 56 HUGHES, E.STAN 60 HUNGSPREUG, PAISARN 76 HURSH, BOB "'118 ITTNER, DONALD W. 1'168 JASTRAM, HAROLD D. 74 JOHNSON, DALE R. 154 JOHNSON, GORDON '107 JOHNSON, ROLLIG ,. :141 JOHNSON, SCOTT L. 451 JOHNSTON, GEORGE H. 73 JOHNSTON, JIM 174 JONDAHL, ROBERT'S. 135 KEATING, RONALD 21 KELLY, CHARLES 63 KELLY, JOHN 84 KIDD, ROBERT JOSEPH 14 KILGORE, BOB 10 KING, JIM 138 KING, JOE 85 KING, ROBERT C. 80 KINNEY, BERNIE 148 KOERBER, CHUCK 6 LANNERS. BRUCE A. #4204 124 LEMIEUX, ROGER W. 122 LILLIS , JOE 95 LIND, HAROLD 0. PRIORITY LISTING OF BMC WAITING LIST APPLICANTS BY RANK ORDER OR ALPHABETICAL. ORDER HOMEPHON OFF . PHON .APPL . DATE BIRTHDAY COMMENTS 927 -5078 926 -3702 343 72500 926 -9142 925 -1455 938 -1745 938 -3489 929 -2342 929 -2342 929 -1058 927 -5319 941 -2731 372 -8736 941 -1956 545 -2541 922 -6764 342 -5810 935 -1172 929 -6111 929 -6111 926 -2665 929-1425 925 -2137 333 -6990 920 -2642 425 -4191 929 -1152 G81 -6144 925 -1301 941 -7919 475 -6149 944 -2748 944-0585 922 -6527 624 -7212 941 -1249 835 -9697 941 -2273 344 -9281 941 -3928 435 =2550 944 -2295 829 -4750 922 -0112 921 -2701 941 -6468 924 -2635 927 -8059 726 -7727 938 -2897 941 -1787 941 -6408 452 -5333 926 -4505 941-5726 922 -2557 922 -2557 938 - 3609 546 -8917 927 -6798 925 -3319 925 -3319 926 -2464 338 -3807 929 -7726 473-7726 929 -7407 921 -0416 933 -2411 04/18/89 04/27/89 02 /10 /8S 01/12/88 06/09/ 88 03/14/87 01/23/89 06/10/87 07/15/87 04/28%89 02/01/86 11/16/86 06/18/SS 05/13/89 02/11/87 06/06/89 03/11/89 07/23/87 09/21/86 07/06/89 03/31/89 02/27/87 07/18/87 08/05/87 01/10/88 02/05/89 0 ?/30/89 01/01/88 05/21/89 10/16/88 04/15/89 05/15/89 1 -1/ 14/87 08/23/89 04/12/89 08/15/36 08/18/87 03/01/88 05/22/86 04/03/86 04/14/69 03/ 24 /tS 01/26%85 05/07/89 09/15/89 06/19/26 11/27/37 02/17/41 02/14/47 04/24/27 11/22/69 r/ 08/18/38 07/22/25 r/ 11/03/34 01/12/35 12/13/59 10/13/34 r/ 11/25/23 07/15/35 10/22/55 12/19/62 i/ 12/10/29 12/16/53 926 -5451 851 -1136 03/27/89 08/13/31 920 -4409 339 -8981 03/18/89 08/31/46 941 -5039 06/01/68 / #11 4/18/90 NO RET. 86 DELAY TO 1/90 DELAY TO 1/90 DELAY TO 1/90 Page No. 3 09/22/89 PRIORITY LISTING OF BMC WAITING LIST APPLICANTS BY RANK ORDER OR ALPHABETICAL :'ORDER POS APPLICANT NAME HOMEPHON OFF.PHON APPL.DATE BIRTHDAY COMMENTS 88 LINDEMANN, CHUCK 926 -1296 823 -5225 04%11/88 12 LORD, WILLIAM K., SR. 926 -7238 04%14/86 % DELAY TO 1/90 36 LeGROS, JIM 941 -1652 944 -5033 02/20/87 23 MACLENNAN, JOHN R. 929 -8496 09/18/86 2 MAXWELL, DOUG 926 -8652 04%02/85 / / DELAY TO 1/90 132 MCGRATH, FRANCIS X. 920 -1286 544 -3200 04%09/89 11/29/26 123 MEINKE, GARY 941- 7522 476 -2000 03/24/89 06/13/41 33 MERTZ, JOHN H. 925 -3828 01/31/87 162 MOON, GREG 929 -3811 929 -3850 06/07/89 02/01/47 32 MURPHY, DAVID 920 -5497 01%23/87 144 MURPHY, JOHN 941 -4123 829 -0068 04/19/89 12/24/4 26 MacCORRACK, ROBERT L. 933 -0335 10/13/86 54 McCLAIN, BILL 944 -8268 07/12/87 50 McELHATTON, JOHN W. 831 -4959 05/28/87 59 McGILL, JACK 944 -9469 08/03/87 65 McKERNAN, JOHN B. 922 -8267 09/17/87 16 NELSON, JAMES R. 920 -1593 07/16/86 / / DELAY TO 1%90 156 NYDAHL, BRUCE . 941 -5549 920 -2696 05/31/89 07/11/34 '8 OAKES, MANLEY E. 925 -4452 929 -6648 09/18/89 04/30/29 0 OLSON, RICHARD J. 922 -3907 927 -1117 04/24/88 17 OLSON, ROY 941 -4345 9291308 07/28/86 / / DELAY TO 1%90 :167 OTTO, JAMES, R. 941 -4003 341 -7629 07/23/89 11/28/32 44 PAGE, CLAYTON 938 -4163 04/02/87 72 PASCOE, MORGAN 926 -2200 11/13/87 139 PERKINS, MICHAEL 935 - 1843 829 -3418 04/15/89 / 25 PERS•INGER, DALE 927 -9536 09/27/86 62 PERUNOVICK, ELI 941 -2608 68/18/87 101 PETSCHAUER, DICK J. 941 -3553 635 -5568 07/04/88 142 PLATT, JAMES E. JR. 941 -9637 944 -8293 04/16/89 11/17/46 103 POPOVICH, JOHN G. 941 -7971 347 -4741 07/12%88 31 PROSHEK, LUMIR C. 941-6161 01/13/87 42 QUINN, BRUCE 920 -7113 03%23%87 91 RAMING, DICK 920 -2206 835 -2252 05/12/88 48 ROBERTSON,ROBERT E. 941 -4139 05%05/87 155 ROBINSON, JAMES LEE 922 -9389 05/30/89 06/17/26 6 ROWLAND, R.H. 929 -3760 01/01/86 01/01/26 DELAY TO 1/90 75 ROYCE, HERB 929 -1813 01/04/88 67 SALEH, PAUL 926 -2849 870 -20G9 10/04/87 114 SANDERS, WAYNE R. 927 -9442 01/06/89 153 SANDVIG, MARK 920 -5789 544 -0321 05/18/89 05/17/50 47 SANDVIK, ALLEN 922 -6062 04/28/87 / 128 SCHNEIDER, HOWARD R. 944 -8324 831 -0585 03/31/89 02/01/43 OFFER SENT 11 SCHNEIDER, NEAL 941 -7328 941 -7963 04/05/86 / / DELAY TO 1/90 .117 SCHOONOVER. HEWITT A. 927 -6325 01/31/89 / /• 11 SCOTT, J.T. 942 -8902 533 -2791 12/13/88 9 SIMMONS, RICK 927 -4832 888 -9211 01/22/88 170 SIMONSON, KERMIT L. 922 -4993 371 -2508 08/04/89 06/23/38 45 SKALLERUD, WILLIAM 926- 1012 333- 0543 04/03/87 -119 SKOGLUND, D.' W. 933 -4521 03/10/89 / j' #11 3/10/90 Page No. 4 09/2/89 POS APPLICANT NAME 159 SKORDAHL, ORV 18 SLAYTC,hI, BILL 53 SMITH, FRANK 175 SORENSON, SCOTT L. 30 SOUR, CLIFFORD 125 SPOKES, PETER R. 1 STROMSETH, QUENTIN 129 SWIFT, JOHN J. 71 TANEY, WALT 39 TEEGEN, RICHARD F. 86 THORP, JIM 66 TIERNEY, JOEL 169 TORDSEN. MILT 34 TOWEY, JOHN 92 TROMBLEY, KEN 43 TURNER, SPENCER 41 WAACK, DONALD 96 WAGNER, LOU 98 WALLENTINE. RAY L. 19 WANK, RICHARD 3 WARNER, GEORGE M. X31 WELLMAN, FRANK 5 WENDT, NORM 61 WICK, DAVE A. 20 WIDGA, LEE 46 WILLIAMS, HAROLD G. 89 WOLFF, LEE A. 49 WRIGHT, WILLIAM S. 130 WYATT, ROBERT F. 28 ZANIN, LEE 1136 ZINSCHLAG, DAVID 140 ZUMBERGE, GARY S. * ** Total * ** * ** PRIORITY LISTING OF BMC WAITING LIST APPLICANTS BY RANK ORDER OR .ALPHABETICAL ORDER HOMEPHON OFF.PHON APPL.DATE BIRTHDAY COMMENT. 941 -1498 06/05/89 944 -1786 522 -3643 08/03/86 941 -3535 07/10/87 933 -4242 933 -4242 09/12/89 941 -6235 01/08/87 942 -7404 942 -7404 03/27/89 938 -6392 03/01%85 920 -3554 349 -7867 03/31/89 944 -8926 11/12/87 926 -9748 03%06/87 829 -8011 935 -3300 04/01/88 929 -0948 09/18/87 922 -3150 08/03/89 941 -2018 542 -7706 02 %10/87 829 -0727 823 -6888 05/17/88 929 -6216 925 -7043 04/01/87 941 -3144 03/22/.87 926 -5334 926 -5334 06/02%88 920 -5274 927 -9260 06/10/88 929 -7176 08/13/86 926 -4410 330 -6546 02/12/88 922-0170 927 -8861 04/05/89 922 -5169 07/04/85 08/11/87 938 -7833 08/14/86 925 -1164 04/12/87 941 -8491 941 -8491 04/19/88 941 -2312 05/07/87 922 -3873 922 -3873 04/02/89 926 -9587 371 -2938 11/15/86 922 - 7485 227 -7621 04/13/89 927 -7146 925- 6839 04/15%89 09/08/21 09/06/51 01/14/28 01/15/32 05/24/25 08/22/34 07/10/21 03/02/39 11/20/49 DELAY TO 1/90 DELAY TO 1/90 MARY E. GIVENS l POINT OF FRANCE #906 6566 FRANCE AVE. S. ! Aug. 25, 1989 .../// EDINA, MN 55435 Mr. Robert Kojetin Director of Parks & Recreation 4801 West 50th St. Edina, Mn. 55424 Dear Mr. Kojetin, I recently talked to Mr. Valerie about the possibility of putting a Satelite on the Executive Course, and he said you were opposed to it. :1 Last week I played with two women, one had recently had a baby, and the other was about my age. None of us dared drink anything because of the fear of not making it back - granted you have trees, but you also have poison ivy!!!! I hear all sorts of comments in the club house like "I don't dare drink coffee it goes right through me" etc. etc. If I don't have my coffee, I can barely be sociable in the morning, . much less address a golf ball. Please have pity on the bladders of women our age. After all, we are the ones who have given you the young golfers! Your course attracts many Senior people, and both men and women have problems along this line. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, L� Mary Givens, Treasurer, Golden Girls copy /John Valerie ST 0014 Fred Richards, Mayor EDZNA SCHOOL BOARD'S LONG RANGE PLAN NOTED Member Paulus reported that the Ed School Board together with 15 different representatives from the community has formed a committee to develop a 20 -year long range plan. She said that she is a part of that and their first meeting is scheduled for September 20. She asked that the Council Members contact her if they had anything to interject. GIVENS LETTER REQUESTING SATELLITE ON EXECUTIVE GOLF COURSE DISTRIBUTED Mayor Richards circulated a letter addressed to the Director Parks & Recreation dated August 25, 1989 from Mary E. Givens, 6566 France Avenue So., about the' possibility of placing a satellite on the Executive Course. Director Bob Kojetin said they ar addressing that reauest. August 31, 1989 TO: John Valliere, Braemar Golf Course '. Dear John: I have been in the Bowling Green League for eighteen years and today is my last day unless the Edina City Council grandfathers us in. I wonder if either you or the city council really realise how hurt we non - resident members ='T are, or the repercussions which will result. We are the oldest women's league Minnesota and we came to Braemar when it was built, at their _ ,(Wyears)-in - invitation, because they needed us (now they don't need us ?) Several years ago you asked us to take in only Edina residents, which we gladly did; and as a result, we now have only 35 non - residents out of about 110 women. Almost all of us are older and the process of attrition and general moving demands in life will probably take all of us in the next few years. The Edina women, being the majority, will stay and perhaps assume the league name. This will leave the rest of us with no place to go as a group - just scattered to the winds. We have made lifelong friendships. Our eighteen -hole champion who lives in Minnea-�:7-...1:fir: polis joined in 1938 and our nine -hole champion who lives in Minnetonka joined `�; in 1965 - now they may not even be able to play in the league. At one time, I believe, a motion was made to grandfather ionly those who had been in fifteen years or longer. This would only affect a very few as we've almost all been here a very long time. We love the golf course and the friend - ships we've made with your Edina members and ask that you please consider the grandfather clause. Our final luncheon is October fifth and it would be a glorious day if we could make an acceptance announcement. Thank you for whatever you can do. You may read any portion of this to the Edina City Council if you wish. Si cerely, Betty lafse?,' ichfield Bowling Green Member since 1971 Re: Proposed procedures for Thursday starting times Facts: 1939 - 222 players signed up for Thursday Event - average number of players was 154 (Range 137 to 169) 1990 - Blocked off tee times - 9:00am to 2:30pm 7 minutes per foursome = 44 tee times plus 3 starter times. 44.x 4 = 176 players All players signed up for the Thursday Event in 199C will be mailed a °Reserved Starting Time Form" to be completed and returned to Event Chairman if a regular starting time is desired for the 1990 season. Approximately 1/2 of the available starting times will be assigned on a permanent basis with the remainder available for weekly reservations as we now have. The first permanent tires will be for the months of 'iay and June. There will be another drawing for the remainder of the season at the end of June. Return the form stating the members in your foursome and desired starting time, i.e. 9:00- 1C:001-1 ", 10:00- 11:00c1;1, etc. and a check to 3`,:C for forty dollars. 3� C Officers will then assign specific starting times by draw for approximately 1/2 of the starting times. The balance of the times will be available on a weekly basis just as now by calling 741 -7365 Thursday morning from 3:00A; to 9:OOA" for the following weeks play. Only "Call -in" reservations will be taken .during this time. after °:00' : the reservation sheet will be in tie Pro Shop, and reservations can be made in person for any remaining foursomes or singles, just as now. Those foursomes having,a permnanent starting time can make substitutions in their group from any Thursday Event member. They also can cancel one or more of their group by calling the Pro Shop before Thursday, the day of play. If no cancellations are made and less than 4 members arrive at the tee time assigned the foursome will be charged 510.00 per missing person. :11hen the $40.00 is used the group will have the reserved time taken away. If none of the $40.00 (or only part thereof) is used for absent golfers the balance will be returned to sender at the end of the reservation period. The Committee: Chuck Drees Dave AcEnary Tass Von Schmidt -Pauli Pat Finley F2 June 6, 1989 Edina City Council 4801 - West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55423 To whom it may concern: We are writing regarding the future of the Braemar Golf League - "Sunshine Gals." At our organizational meeting it was brought to our attention that effective in 1990 all members of the Braemar Golf Leagues must be Edina residents. Our league has been a loyal patron of the Braemar Golf Course for over ten years. Only a few of the members are Edina residents, but we hope to continue golfing at Braemar for years to come. We respectfully request that you consider a compromise to your policy of Edina residency: we suggest that current members of the league may not be terminated. The restriction of Edina residency would apply only to new members who wish to join the league. Over time, through attrition, your goal of Edina residency would still be achieved. In the meantime, Braemar (and the City of Edina) can continue to benefit from the weekly patronage of the "Sunshine Gals." Please note this league plays on the Executive Course and there is ample room for additional Edina residents to join as members. Please, re- evalute your proposed policy of Edina members only in Braemar Golf Leagues. Thank you, SUNSHINE GALS - Bernice Schultz 6510 Humboldt Ave. So. Richfield MN. 55423 I SUNSHINE GALS - /Ue0 MAP .. . % Septembet 16, 1989 Dean Mt. R.i.chatds, I understand that the issue o� non - residents in .league play at Btaemat Gott Course is coming be4ote the City Council in Oc tobet. I am a botmet kaident o4 Edina and have played at Btaemat in the BowP.i.ng Green Got4 League since the course opened 25 years ago. Out group was the 6iut .league invited to play at Btaemat. We ate now told that we rust break up out gnoup and att non -Edina tesidents must .leave. I would tike the City Council to cons-i.det allowing the .league to temain intact and to "Gtandbathet in" the hew non- taidents who tona,i.n. This seems to be the poti.cy in other suburbs where a non- tesident Lute is to be .imptemented. Thank you 4ot co" i.deting this matter. Sincetety, ;�7 `_ � slit .��c� .�� ��� �-d-� ��- l=ea c�/.�� � et,� l .Q.fG y °L tLl2 - Ae liC 2� i WOW September 18, 1989 Mr. Fred Richards, 1-fayor City of Edina 4801 vo 50th Street Edina, Mn. 55424 Dear 1-4r. Mlayor, I have been a member.of the Bowling Green Golf League for 27 years, two years before we were invited to play at Braemar. I have en- joyed playing at Braemar and appreciate it's beautJ -ful landscaping and. the care the city of Edina has given it. For this reason I have bought a Patron's ticket for many dears, even tho I do not play on weekends. The league has enabled all of us in Bowling Green to make many won- derful friends, some of ti l- om are not residents of Edina but have been in the league for many ,years. As I understand it, our group has not taken in any non - residents since 1981. This ti�aas by a re- quest from the management of Braemar. Although I live in Edina, I have a very strong wish that our non- resident members would be able to remain a part of the Bowling Green League. My husband and I thoroughly enjoy living in Edina and appreciate the good. service we have always received when malting a request about a problem. We think the city does a tremendous job on snow plow- ing. We also enjoy the parks very much. Thank you for listening to me. Sincerely, Lois Falk 7200 Cahill Rd. ;°'31C Edina, i'n. 55435 .. OURAGE 3915 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley,'MN 55422 (612) 588-0811 Courage Center is a nnnprofit organization ling rehabilitation and ndentliving services for .en and adults with physical disabilities and sensory, impairments. Equal Opportunity Provider A United Way Agency C E N September 26, 1989 Dan D nsigh Braemar o f Course 6364 Dewey Hill Rd. Edina, MN 55435 Dear Dan: T E R I want to thank you and Braemar Golf Course for again allowing us to run our "LET'S GO GOLFING ".program at you course this year. The ten golfers improved greatly and had a very successful experience. The highlight was the opportunity to use the skills that they learned by playing.the executive course. Thank you, Dan, and your staff for your wonderful.cooperation. The staff is always so helpful and courteous. I hope you'll thank all of them for us. Enclosed is the check for our fee for the balls. Thanks also for letting us use tees and clubs as we needed them. We look forward to returning again next year. Thanks for your support of sports for children with disabilities. Sincerely, 1 &4 . klst� Karyl Hoeger, Coordinator Community Recreation Programs Sports, Physical Education and Recreation KH /bjs cc: John Valerie Edina Gymnastics Association X201 Eden Circle • Edina, iVlinnesota S� ��6 • (612) 920 -532 August 28,°1989 Mr. Mark Poss Olympic Sports Festival 444 Cedar Street St. Paul, MN 55110 Dear Mr. Poss: This is a followup to my telephone conversation with _you. On behalf of the Edina Gymnastics Assocaition, I would like to make our facilities available to be used by the gymastics participants in the Olympic Sports Festival: The Edina Gymnastics Association is the largest park and recreation gymastics program in the state of Minnesota. It is one of the few gymnastics programs that is not pri- vately owned and part of private enterprise. It is a volunteer parents -run organization, with over 800 students participating. Our facility is approximately 10,000 square feet, and has all of the equipment necessary for the training of athletes. In our phone conversation, you indicated that you were going to attempt to have all the training done as close as possible to the University of Minnesota. In the event that.you are not able to handle all of the gymnasts at the University of Min- nesota, we will make our facility available and will work with you in arranging transportation so that the gymnasts can travel to and from our facility to the Universitv where they are being housed, with no additional cost to the Sports Festival. Further, the staff of the EGA and our Board of Directors, as well as the various parent support groups, are more than will- ing to make themselves available to assist you in ensuring that the gymnastics program at the Sports Festival is a com- plete success. We are willing to take whatever time is necessary to ensure that the athletes' stay in Minnesota will be a very positive one, both for the athletes and our state. Mr. Mark Poss -2- August 28, 1989 Olympic Sports Festival Due to the fact that we are a community -based park and recreation program, I believe that we can offer more services than any of the local organizations inasmuch as we have a very close working relationship with the City of Edina and the Park and Recreation Department, and they, too, are more than willing to do whatever is necessary, within limits, of course, to ensure that the pro- gram is as successful-as possible. I am looking forward to meeting with you, and if there is anything that I can do by way of services for the Festival, all you need to do is contact me at my office, 929 -7145, or the gymnastics club at the address on our letterhead. Again, I enjoyed our conversation, and am looking forward to working with you in the future. Thank you for your time and consideration. V('�V truly yours, Th;�mas._tt�Wilson III President Edina Gvmnastics Association TBW:dnh ee The Hon. Frederick S. Richards, Mayor, City of Edina Robert Kojetin, Director of Parks and Recreation, City Edina John Keefe, Hennepin County Commissioner Dennis Metzold, President, Edina Chamber of Commerce Gail Peterson, Acting Director, EGA Y October 10, 1989 TO: EDINA PARK BOARD FROM: BRAEMAR WOMEN'S GOLF LEAGUES RE: REQUEST TO AMEND NOVEMBER 2, 198 '7, GOLF RULES #1 AND #2 AS PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. OUR REQUEST IS SIMPLE - - - THOSE OF US WHO CURRENTLY HAVE DUAL - MEMBERSHIP AND NON- RESIDENT STATUS CONTINUE "AS IS" IN THE BRAEMAR WOMEN'S GOLF LEAGUES. ATTRITION WILL BRING THE MEMBERSHIPS TO THE REQUESTED LEVELS. Braemar management initiated a decrease (Sept., 187) of the membership limits of four 9 -hole Women's Leagues from 60 members to 48. This is 48 members less in the over -all total in Women's Leagues. These leagues are being allowed to accomplish this by attrition and NO WOMAN IS BEING REQUIRED TO DROP OUT OF HER LEAGUE! FACTS 'N FIGURES: 280% of the tee times are scheduled for men's and women's leagues. 72% of the tee times are for open golf. Nine additional holes are being added which will greatly increase available tee times. Women's Morning Leagues on the Regulation Course: 50 to 55 Edina women residents are in two leagues. 40 league members are non - residents. Thursday -18 has openings - - any Edina woman who wants to play in an 18 -hole league can do so. Wednesday 9 and 18 do not have immediate openings. Executive Course: John Valliere's expressed opinion is "there is no crunch on the Executive Course ". C � t j Wednesday .-February, 10'."- 1988 Vol: 17. No . 20.' SECTION':- Golf league rules changes H you are starting to plan for a summer on the golf course, there are some eligibility and rule changes in the Braemar golf leagues you should know about. • All golf league members must be residents of Edina. Present league members who are non- residents may continue to play through the 1899 season. ;L — • Beginning in 1890, league members will be allowed to play in only one league or division. 3 — • All league memberships will be capped at the present level.. Any nine -hole women's morning league, presently capped at more than 48 members will reduce their membership to 48 through attri- tion, thus facWtating orderly Play for:the.18 -hole golfers on the back nine. -/ — • Starting times or days may be changed for some leagues to make more effective use of the course. — • Beginning in 1880, the National Car: Renal,- Hennepin County and Singles leagues will be eliminated. These channges•were passed by the City Council on Nov. 2. There are no openings in the women's nine -hole league, but there are openings in some wom- en' 18 -hole leagues. Call the Braemar pro shop for information. October 10, 1989 To: Members of Edina Park Board From: Martha Hilgendorf- Member of Bowling Green Golf League 6120 Hansen Road, Edina, MN. Dear Members: As a member of the Bowling Green Golf League (with a membership at present of 110) I would like to present the following facts for-your consideration: Our league has been playing at Braemar since the course opened in the mid -60's. The league had been playing on a Minneapolis course and were invited to transfer to Braemar - which was done. We still have as members 20 of those women who were part of our league at that time - and 9 of those women were and are non - residents of Edina. The last year we accepted non - residents (at the request of Braemar) was 1981, at which time there were 5 non - residents who joined (we had accepted 2 in 1980, 4 in 1977, 2 in 1976). As you can see, we have cooperated fully with the guidelines established in 1981. As I understand it, there are about 2700 golfers using Braemar in a given week (during mid - summer). I,f all of our members golfed each week we would use 4% of the tee - times. We have 31 non - resident members at this time - and if they all golfed - they would use a little over 1% of the tee - times. However, we are allotted only 24 tee -times one day a week - so you can see it is not possible for all of our members to use the course on a given day. Please consider this information in your decision. We have thoroughly enjoyed our membership at Braemar these many years - and consider it THE best public course in our area. We are hoping we can continue in 1990 and beyond as the Bowling Green Golf League at Braemar. Thanks from all of us for all the efforts you make in our behalf. CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED AS A RESULT OF. OCTOBER 10, 1989 PARK BOARD MEETING REGARDING BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE LEAGUE POLICIES C07 ell ��� ���� ,7 zee or °Sl;i��7goJ� 'YeYlo "2 3 _?/'!"705 4'7M(;l I�z�lY ��i c?rY�i NO�1/a'L <f•/ �Ga /1 -Z-.3M,5 XaeRA z Sri sa- &7A - wjsqv &4z-2Cf/ d' /�1SrL �A'vfi?1,2� su 1`7n 'nb°P — r('?/6,0`Gr -;;Pia 56-0,Y960' a►i6r�/yr✓ stU��s .J ���� s�:�dnp7 �y�n► -��.� h����.� c sn7� �n�-7 mv�6� 01 C-?� �' a'�6� �i�i Cv�l1. H n'/ j P� vrr!s�� 9/Y�� �iv� S1 �GfiOiJ'�1 ,1yyr 0(7ZZ oW7l -20C -z7n� rr"f-f/�c aa'oJ-A• N%w o.% �nb/f� Q1- �l�9b_�7 OA11 4L �X1/OZ =�£� �1%9(Y 3-711161! 2.4 P1 Qv 6VA2 16- 7 -01W 016014 AW41 O� 9Nr7 �np/Y OiY,'1 S[/YaPiS�'�' 1N�Q0y /1��1f/d-7 ' a' ,w-76ba�' 1-P 53�3W7 P1 9(YP?32' 2L 3(7N1L(o1'9,.7 94 SCrv�P�a'(►'O!Y '/1.Ci14' ' l�J /LS3('(� lY/ :x.,2'0,17 �3(l55✓ OG%1! 6,7V W jo - 0fY(I() A,4 October 12, 1989 City Council of Edina Village Hall Edina, Minnesota 55424 To The City Council of Edina: This letter is in concern of the Braemar Golf Course. Last Tuesday evening I attended the meeting of.the Park and Recreation Board. Also attending were many.of my non - resident Bowling Green golfing friends. Bowling Green is the league that was asked to come to Braemar in 1968 and has about 40 non -resi- dents in it at the present time. The situation made it uncom- fortable for me to get up to express my feelings on the issues at Braemar. The two main issues are: 1. Non - residents staying in leagues at Braemar. 2. Residents maintaining dual league memberships. The Park Board voted 6 -3 recommending that all non - residents currently ulaying in a league at Braemar be grandfathered to stay. This includes a number of about 150 people since the recommendation went across the board to the Executive Course and the Regulation Course. The Board voted 8 -1 recommending that Edina residents can only belong to one league. The men at Braemar have two leagues: the Braemar Men's Club and the Golden Agers. The women do not have a club, but have several small leagues. We have about 35 Edina men who are in the Golden Agers and the Men's Club. There are about 50 women from Edina who are in dual leagues. This makes a total of about 85 residents in dual leagues. All of us are taxpayers and many of us have been in Edina supportive of Braemar equally as long as the Bowling Green Women. We are asking you to give equal consideration for the long time support the Edina residents have given to Braemar and that those currently in dual league member- ships be grandfathered to stay. Thank you for your kind consideration. Sincerely, e 6600 Blackfoot Pass Edina, Minnesota 55435 Ora r k r 1�7i� /« r s .Z Gf kr�(f r.sta A(e Q74 fl e r e .36 ki �r-- C �p�✓ �.s Co cc rs = �Qi� res��� ,Ze% �K tf // �.,1 / G2 alt rs 7Z1"1'f'v 41 4;1 74�71y / r �5�� 7s -7 -GU ZC e5 C� E S 4f 7L� L emu► 7o -T IaXlgOall' h� y . ��r5� .� ci c��� �7�1 /7i� �c��77��5r ��; 7e' To: THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA Subject: BRAEMAR GOLF LEAGUE MEMBERSHIP On Tuesday evening,October 10,1989, the Edina Park Board approved a motion to "grandfather in" all non - residents who are now members of golf leagues at Braemar Golf Course. I applaud them for recognizing the long term support the Bowling Green League has given to the golf club. I have lived in Edina for 35 years and have played league golf at Braemar since 1974. I am asking you to recognize the Edina residents who have given long term support to the Braemar Golf Course. Please give.equal consideration to the Edina women who play in two golf leagues at Braemar and grant them the privileptge of continuing in two leagues by "grandfathering" all who now are members of two leagues. Your favorable consideration will be appreciated. Jeanne Swanson 5228 West 56th Street Edina,Minnesota 55436 0 October 11, 1989 Dear Mayor Richards: At the October 10th Park Board Meeting I understand they decided to recommend that you "gradfather in" all non - residents of Edina for golf leagues at Braemar. As a 30 year resident and tax payer of Edina and a dual- member of Braemar Golf Leagues for some 20 years I and Edina Golf League members like me should at least get equal consideration. We've supported the golf program, given donations to improve the course and paid taxes in the City and believe we should at least get the same consideration as non -Edina golfers. I urge you to reconsider their recommendations and be fair to Edinans by "grandfathering" us in also. ' Sincerely, Jacqueline Nash 5725 Dale Avenue Edina, MN 55436 October 11, 1989 EDINA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: We, the Braemar Women's Golf Leagues, presented a simple request to the Park Board, Tuesday, October 10, asking for their support of the following recommen- dation. Our suggestion to them was that we go on with the leagues at the current memberships and look forward to the expansion of our additional nine holes which will greatly increase available tee times for Edina residents. AND NO WOMAN WOULD BE REQUIRED TO DROP OUT OF HER LEAGUE. "PERMIT THOSE OF US WHO CURRENTLY HAVE DUAL - MEMBERSHIP AND NON- RESIDENT STATUS TO CONTINUE 'AS IS' IN THE BRAEMAR WOMEN'S GOLF LEAGUES. ATTRITION WILL BRING THE MEMBERSHIPS TO THE REQUESTED LEVELS." The Park Board by a 6 -3 vote chose to allow ALL NON- RESIDENTS ONLY to remain in their current leagues. Bob Christianson, Park Board chair, was in opposition and commented that this "discriminates against the Edina resident ". We, the Edina residents, are the bill payers for our community, the supporters, the voters, the volunteers, and our taxes support the entire park system. Many of us are long -time Edina homeowners and taxpayers and have been for many years enthusiastically supportive and involved at Braemar Golf Course. The total of non - residents (women only, there are none in men's leagues) is 156 for morning, evening, and executive course leagues. Braemar management also allows "outside" groups to schedule tee times, an average of 100 golfers per week of play. The dual - membership total of Edina residents in leagues is approximately 50 women and 35 men, for a total of 85. It is our firm feeling that at the present time - and with the future addition of 9 -holes to the regulation course - there is room for all of us: Edina residents and non - residents* "Down- the - road" attrition will bring the memberships to the requested, restrictive levels and most important, no woman will be compelled to drop out of a league. We are appealing this Park Board vote to you, the City Council, and asking that you re- address our recommendation. Thank you for your support! Sy is Eisler (5905 Chowen Av So) Homeowner in Edina since April, 1958 Bowling Green Golf League - member since 1974 Braemar Monday Golf League - member since 1974 Braemar Golf Association Board member THE ENCLOSED INFORMATION SHEETS ARE IN.REGARD TO THE BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE. I. COMMENTS AND FIGURES SUPPORTING A REQUEST FROM THE WOMEN'S GOLF LEAGUES TO AMEND THE DUAL - MEMBERSHIP AND NON- RESIDENT POLICIES. II. AN OVER -ALL REVIEW OF MEMBERSHIP QUOTAS PER LEAGUE. III. THE POLICIES AT BRAEMAR SINCE 1978. WOMEN'S GOLF LEAGUES AT BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE The following is a summary from comments made by different members of several of the Women's Leagues. (Compiled by Sylvia Eisler.) The City Council passed the following "Golf league rules c_anpW,," at their meeting on November 2 19 (the changes to -take effect for the 1990 golf season) 1. All golf league members must be residents of Edina. Present league members who are non - residents may continue to play through the 1989 season. 2. Beginning in 1990, league members will be allowed to play in only one league or division. 3. All league memberships will be capped at the present level. Any nine -hole women's morning league, presently capped at more than 48 members will reduce their membership to 48 through attrition, thus facilitating orderly play for the 18 -hole golfers on the back nine. 4. Starting times or days may be changed for some leagues to make more effective use of the course. 5. Beginning in 1990, the National Car Rental, Hennepin County and Singles leagues will be eliminated. In the spring of 1989, a $2.2 million "recreational facility" bboon.C1?� P waG Gni d by the City of Edina which inclu e e a ition of a new nine -hole golf course ". According to a report from City Manager, Ken Rosland, "There seems to be an ever increasing demand for more Golf, and _we le_ we can meet the demand v addina these nine holes." In a time study (9- 17 -187) done by John Hoyt of the Men's Club, "Analysis of Golf Course Usage During an Average Week ", he reports: "League play on the 18-hole- course presently constitutes on a weekly basis, only 28 percent of available tee times." qrmmmwmw� With an additional nine holes of open tee times, this 28961 of league usage will be greatly decreased and will become a much smaller part of the over -all picture. The 72% available tee times for open golf will then be greatly increased for Edina residents. The addition of nine holes to the present 18 will create a usage of 27 holes in combinations. John Valli =, Braemar Golf Course Manager, is requesting two changes to these 1987-Rules: Rule #3i "All league memberships will be capped at the present level." A very difficult problem at Braemar is the lengthy waiting list of Edina men desiring membership in the Men's Club. Braemar management and the Men's Club have agreed that an increase of the capped membership is necessary and advisable. A request, therefore, will be presented to the City Council to amend Rule #3 and allow the Men's Club to increase their membership by 50: from 275 to 325. Rule #2• "Beginning in 1990, league members will be allowed to play in only one league gu gue o division.,, John is going to request this rule be amended by allowing resident golfers to join the Friday afternoon Mixed League (formerly called Couples) as the ONLY allowable second league. It is our position that the definition of a league is a group of people, whether '. it be all men, all women, or both men and women in one league, who have organized to play golf and been assigned specific tee times on the same day of each week by Braemar management. A comment was made that the Mixed League is for sociability. The Women's Leagues are also for sociability and friendship, as well as playing golf. A solution could be to allow the dual memberships and after that continue with the Mixed League as a third league but with NO restrictions as to membership in other leagues. fic request is" with the orderl e policies of joining just one league and being an Edina resident have been in effect since 1984 and the leagues have adhered to them. Through attrition the memberships will reach the desired level of Edina residents and one league membership. We also call your attention to Rule #3 where the rule is in force right now to cut back by 20% the four morning 9 -hole leagues that had an allowable 60 membership. This is being accomplished by attrition and UQ.J MAN IS BEING REQUIRED TO DROP FROM HER LEAGUE! This membership decrease has opened up the golf course for early morning golfers desiring to play 18- holes. (6:30 - 6:54 a.m.) Neither the Braemar Men's Club nor the men's Golden Age League have ever had any non - resident members. When Bowling Green (Thursday, Women's 9 and 18) came to Braemar in 1965, the majority were non - residents. And welcomed. Wei - - Let us remain in our leagues -- do not make our "retirement" mandatory! We are scheduled for just a part of the 28% tee times and that percentage will be even less with the additional nine holes. We have cooperated with Braemar management to open up early morning tee times for those desiring to play 18 -holes by cutting 48 GOLFERS FROM THE WOMEN'S LEAGUES'MEMBERSHIP TOTAL. We as - for recognition and a gesture of appreciation for the Women's Leagues at Braemar who have contributed to the success and supported this Golf Course for many years. VE ASK - - please amend Rules #1 and #2 and allow attrition to be the on -going policy for the Women's Leagues at Braemar. Attrition: "loss of personnel in an organization in the normal course of events, as by retirement" (Webster's) THANK YOU FROM THE BRAEM- WOMEN' S T.F.A(;iTFS . 1 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE LEAGUES_ WOMEN' S MORNING T,ZAGtM NAME DAY PRESENT ALLOWED NON- RESIDENT Braemar Monday -18 18 Monday 38 38 1 Highlanders 9 Monday 53* 48 1 Edina Women 18 Tuesday 60 60 9 Tuesday 48 48 Braemar Women 18 Wednesday 8`_; 85 Braemar Women 9 Wednesday 55* 48 Bowling Green 18 Thursday 57 60 19 11 it 9 Thursday 52* 48 19 *The four Women's 9 -hole leagues with a formerly allowable membership cap of 60 are in the process of attrition to reduce the "allowed" total to 48. Tuesday Clubbers 9 Tuesday 31 32 Edina Newcomers ** 9 Tuesday 24 24 * *A woman (newcomer) may remain as a member in this league for two years only. She then, if wanting to continue playing in a league, must transfer to another one. There are approximately 50 - 55 women belonging to two morning leagues. There are 40 non - resident members. Both the Wednesday 9 and 18 -hole Women's Leagues have a long waiting list. This is by each woman's choice, either for convenience of the day or for this particular league. There are - and have been for years - openings in the other 18 -hole leagues. WOMEN'S EVENING; LZAC;iTF'S . Braemar Ladies Twilite 9 Monday 30 32 10 Westwood Women 9 Tuesday 24 24 18 EXECUTIVE Gol en Girls Par -3 Swingers Sunshine Gals (evening) Newcomers E}E('fZ ('QiTRSR Qzz T_H_ N wQAM.: City of Edina Sister Kenny Monday 41 60 Tuesday 160 160 35 Wednesday Wednesday 60 64 42 Tuesday 20 24 Monday evening Monday evening 16 16 12 There is one group of 8 men in league play on the Executive Course. Apparently there is a very limited interest among men golfers for the Executive Course to establish a league for them. John Valliere's opinion is "there is no crunch on the Executive Course." T1V$7ISTRTAT. LEAD ESL; :'National Car Rental Hennepin County 9 Monday evening 24 24 18 9 Monday evening 24 24 16 Rule #5: "Beginning in 1990, the National Car Rental, Hennepin County and Singles leagues will be eliminated." These two leagues are moving to other golf courses and this will open up tee times for 48 golfers in the Monday evening tee times. MR1�T I S T .F nnr ES , Golden Agers 18 Monday 120 120 Men's Club 18 Thursday 325 325 * ** 9 Tuesday evening ** *The Men's Club is requesting an increase of 50, from the present 275 allowed to 325. The Men's Club functions under one Board. MIXED TAR (,IM (Couples, Singles) 9 Friday 110 110 (3:30 - 6:54) As of September, 1989, there is a waiting list of 50 couples (110.people). L, M7 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 19� - A person can be a member of two leagues (formerly unlimited) and each new member must be a resident of Edina. June 1983 - - Meeting of Golf Committee: "Beginning in 1984 any new members could only be members of ONE league at Braemar. This includes both men's and ladies' leagues but excludes Braemar's Couples League." "Any of you people who were presently members of two leagues in 1983 would be grandfathered in 1984 and later. In other words you are status quo." A ril 20 198 - - Braemar Golf Committee (5 Wed. Women's Club members; 5 Men's Club members, Don Wineberg of the Park Board, Bob Kojetin, John Valliere): Policies established: 1. In 1988 members of one golf league on regulation course. 2. During 1987, 1988, 1989, may be a member of one additional iea�jL;.e on Executive Course. In 1990, a choice must be made of membership in one league only at Braemar. 3. Two additional leagues to Executive Course only. 4. Free up early morning tee times for patrons and residents. 5. Must be an Edina resident for league membership. August - - Park Board Meeting. Over 20 golfers attended this meeting to oppose the recommendation of the Golf Committee. It was at this meeting that an Edina resident questioned the "non- resident" policy for leagues. The majority of League players are Braemar patrons. Au st 13, 19 - - A letter from John Hoyt addressed to the City Council was distributed among Braemar golfers for reinforcement. A request for delay in action was made. September 17, 1987 - - A letter from the Braemar Men's Club Board of Directors signe y Sully Rudd, President, on their behalf regarding "Open and League Play at the Braemar Golf Course" was sent to Bob Kojetin, Don Weinberg, John Valliere: A time study by John Hoyt declared that "league play on the 18 -hole course presently constitutes on a weekly basis, only 28 percent of available tee times (and less than 46 percent of weekday times) on the 18 -hole course. Given the league support that the course has enjoyed we believe that a move toward a 50 -50 split between league and non - league play might be a reasonable target to be pursued." Additional recommendations by Men's Club: "We also support the continuance of current policies with respect to membership by Edina residents, only one - league coupled with the continuance of the current 'grandfather' clause for current two - league members." Also that one - league members be allowed to join an Executive Course League. And: "Should the course management recommend, after the 1988 season, any further restriction on league play or membership we strongly urge that the initial 'cuts' be made in non - resident individual league membership and the two current non - resident industrial leagues." October 13, 1987 - - The Policies as drawn up by John Valliere, Bob Kojetin, Don winenerg were presented to the Park Board and passed by them. 1. All golf league members must be residents of Edina. Present league members who are non - residents may continue to play through the 1989 season. 2. Beginning in 1990, league members will be allowed to play in only one league or division. 3. All league memberships will be capped at the present level. Any nine -hole women's morning league, presently capped at more than 48 members will reduce their membership to 48 through attrition, thus facilitating orderly play for the 18 -hole golfers on the back nine. 4. Starting times or days may be changed for same leagues to make more effective use of the course. 5. Beginning in 1990, the National Car Rental, Hennepin County and Singles leagues will be eliminated. November 2, 1982 - - City Council Meeting: A group of 8 women golfers (each one an Edina resident, league member, and patron) read a prepared statement to the members of the City Council requesting them to continue to honor the "grandfather" clause of 1984 permitting those men and women (in appreciation and acknowledgment of Braemar support) to continue "as is" and allow the process of attrition to cut back on non - residents and dual memberships. The Council turned down this request. Februar 10, 1988 - - Notice in the "Sun- Current" regarding "Golf League Rules anges . August 25, 1988 - - Braemar Golf Association is formed. ki ri v Gam." -G� ao zw _ a . s / /` i � �' % � � � / � i ,�'� ;. / / � � � i � � .� /J I �� � - � � � y � �� / / i i / .. / -</ � � r � �' - "' � �. �. i, �� � _ ., —� _ . / � � %/ q / ' � // � ��, �� / '� � � / � .� � �: � • ,/ / - � / � /// ' /. ��i � / i � i ,. �. '��� / � /� �, � - /' � � � / � ` � �'�� � , %� � � � � � � , � � � � /y' .e i 2Xe- Gci-obe2 /!, 1-989 DeaA Maya& 2ichaa.A: S' am a long -time nei.i.dert of Edina and a mem'ben o,I both the Edina Women',. yol,j' AM"ocirction and the Bowling yAeen Women's League. S wa.a veA,u pleaAed to heat that the % a&k BoaAd has aecommended the "gAand- 4athe2ing" o� the non- ice4ident membeAA of the Bowling yaeen League. But S waA veicy d.Aappointed to Kean. that the dual membetis have not, at 6i i point, been given the .iame corvsidertati.on. 7hen"e� one, S am appealing to you on the council io authoA4e this. S have made vezy good 4iendi in 6oth of the leaguei and the do,ie ice Iation&Aipa. would, in many caisea, 6e 6.&ohen 6y JoAr ng dual leaQu,e member to choose 6etween leagues and �Ai.end,.. S! f ind thi i to be ",OAAl y un�aiA. 2e4pect p Uy, & )JIM � �oan "6. AndeAAon 5709 View Lane &ina - L wig djCA-dv S ��,.a,t -7l. �d?.w•a � V ,,r - lua� as S 7'0.c,,,., yc.�,nr c�.a. �+.•� awe_ a�� � aa- ac..o.- �,,,.e., tom►- � -�^a,, �u.�„ a.�-� W ou.� _-_-__---_--_'_-----_--_____ � _ ___'--__ _-_--__-'-__--__^'_--____- ' 7 ��^f C ; V � 1 2 Lf A -d y 7 12 16 October 1989 Dear Councilmember, On 10 October 1989 I attended the Edina'Park Board meeting at City Hall. At that meeting the Edina Park Board voted to grandfather in about one hundred fifty non - residents to play in leagues at the Braemar Golf Course. Only thirty eight of that number are in Bowling Green, the first league at Braemar. Of the remainder, the majority play on the new Executive Course and some play in evening leagues. Most of these non - residents play in other leagues in their own com- munities. None of them buy Braemar patron cards. After giving this privilege to about one hundred and fifty non- residents the Edina Park Board voted that eighty five Edina residents with dual membership will no longer be able to play in more than one league. What happened to equal rights? Therefore, we are asking for at least some consideration. We feel that the Edina residents who currently have dual membership should be allowed to continue "as is" in the Braemar Leagues and that the other league players that wish to play in more than one league be allowed to put their names on waiting lists. Can you possibly justify grandfathering in about one hundred fifty non - residents and do abso- lutely nothing for the Edina residents that play golf at Braemar? We are your constituents and we pay taxes in Edina. Sincerely yours, Lois J. Clynes 5716 Bernard Place Edina, Minnesota 55436 A. !�' k 7 Cn o ,y -� • , -`DAP07V`��O lase REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: GORDON L. HUGHES ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER Date: OCTOBER 16, 1989 Subject: WHITE OAKS LOTS Recommendation: Agenda Item # vII: c. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Adopt resolution in accordance with the request of the White Oaks Improvement Association. Info /Background: We are pleased to report that the City closed on the purchase of the White Oaks Lots on October 10, 1989. This closing occurred after the City received half of the required purchase price from residents in the White Oaks area. On October 2, 1989, we transmitted to you a letter from the White Oaks Improvement Association concerning the property. This letter requested that the Council adopt a Resolution which would "recognize the permanancy of the natural condition and ponding area ". The Council continued consideration of the resolution until the October 16, 1989, meeting. In that we have now closed'on the acquisition of the lots, we believe that it is appropriate for the Council to consider the requested resolution. Although the suggested resolution does not legally encumber the property, it would represent a record of the present Council's intent in the acquisition. If the Council agrees with this request, staff would be prepared to draft an appropriate resolution for inclusion in the minutes. P Agenda Item X.B WHITE OARS .IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION September 19, 1989 The Honorable Mayor and Edina City Council Members Edina City Offices 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Re: Acquisition for.Preservation of Townes Road Marsh Dear Mayor and Council Members: This is to confirm my personal appreciation and that of the White.Oaks Improvement Association and neighbors, past and present, for the excellent work done by the city staff, particu- larly Tom Erickson and Gordon Hughes, among others, in the review, consideration,.and cooperative resolution of the numerous public and private issues involved in this matter. This would not have been possible without the sensitivity and practicality of the entire city council in forthrightly recognizing, addressing, and resolving all of the difficult issues involved. As Gordon Hughes reported to you last night, the total of checks and written pledges had reached the $20,000 level re- quired by the purchase agreement contingency. The process of converting the pledges to cash is well underway and should be completed without difficulty. We are working toward having all the cash or checks to the city by October 2, 1989, one week prior to the scheduled closing date requirement. This should enable the city to commence cashing the more recently received checks by October 1, 1989. We believe that the present intent of the city, as well as that of the approximately 60 private contributors who were solicited on that basis, is that the Townes Road marsh would remain in a "natural condition" as a bird and wildlife sanctuary and ponding area. However, to make this intent clear and to help avoid any future misunderstandings when all the facts and consid- erations are forgotten or not so well understood, we request that the city by resolution, agreement with the neighbors and /or the Association, and /or by appropriate dedication recognize the perma- nency of the natural condition and ponding area. For your records, we are enclosing a list of those persons who appeared at the council meeting last night to express their appreciation for the successful council action to preserve the marsh. As noted at the meeting, this included all the present officers of the Association and two of its five directors and many concerned neighbors from throughout White Oaks. Many others, who a The Honorable Mayor and Edina City Council Members Page 2 September 19, 1989 were also concerned, would have appeared but for the assurance that the matter had been resolved and that an ample delegation .would be present to publicly hear and applaud that the matter had reached resolution by the meeting of the private contribution requirement of the purchase agreement, which is to be closed October'9, 1989. If we can be of assistance in the closing of the matter or the confirmation of the permanency of the ponding and natural aspects, please do not hesitate to call the undersigned or any other officer of the Association. We would appreciate the con- tinuing advice of the status of the matter through closing. Very truly yours, WHITE OAKS IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION By Connor F. Schmid Secretary- Treasurer CFS:wpc 'CC Mr. Gordon Hughes, Assistant City Manager Mr. Thomas Erickson, Esq., City Attorney Dr. Donald McMillan, President Ms. Mary Smith, Vice President Mr. Cliff Code, Pledge Coordinator C^ owed, ;� �� • , ~�bRPOR/�S�O • lees REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor and Council Agenda Item # VII.D From: John Wallin Consent ❑ Finance Director Information Only ❑ Date: October 16, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Fees and Charges - FLI To Council Water and Sewer Rate Increases Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Discussion Recommendation: Discussion of new rates for water and sewer. Info /Background: See attached background memorandum and sewer and water rate study. A Last fall the City Council approved higher water and sewer rates for 1989. These rates were increased from $.33 to $.40 per 100 cu. ft. for water and $1.12 to $1.15 per 100 cu. ft. for sewer. The rate increases were required for 1989 for three reasons: 1. To keep up with the increase in Metropolitan Waste Control Commission collection and treatment charges. 2. To pay for the bonds that the City acquired for the construction of one additional water tower and the installation of one new well. 0 3. To fund operating losses of the previous three years. The amount being charged by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, after the new rates were approved last year, increased their rates from $191,729.94 per month payable in 1988, to $220,257.78 per month payable in 1989. This increase raised costs for the City by $342,334 while the City's increase last year was expected to raise only $300,000 in added revenues. It is important to note that sanitary sewer charges account for approximately 70% of our utility bill. Virtually all of this sewer charge is attributable to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission charges with only a small percentage attributable to City.related sanitary sewer costs. I propose the City increase its water and sewer rates the following way: % CURRENT RATES PROPOSED RATES INCREASE WATER $ .40 per 100 cu.ft. $ .42 per 100 cu.ft. 5% SEWER $1.15 per 100 cu.ft. $1.30 per 100 cu.ft. 13% MINIMUM $27.10 for 1st 1800 $27.10 for 1st 1600 0% CHARGE cu. ft. cu. ft. STORM SEWER $5.00 per quarter $5.00 per quarter 0% It is estimated that the above increases in water and sewer rates would equate to approximately $60,000 more revenue for water and $350,000 more revenue for sewer. The $60,000 is needed to break even on the water portion of the utility fund and the $350,000 will cover the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission increase and cover the increase due to inflation on the maintenance of the sewer system. 1 According to a representative from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, the substantial increase in 1989 sewer treatment charges are mostly due to °infiltration of storm water because of the wet summer of 1987 and in particular, the massive amounts of water that went through the sanitary sewer system during the July, 1987, flood. The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has issued their proposed charges for 1990 which are roughly what they are in 1989. As discussed at the October 2 Council meeting, the Finance Department will begin'a study that will address the issues of conservation of water and the approximate level at which peak usage of water pushes repair and maintenance cost above revenues. The study will involve comparing the past three or four years usage, costs, and revenues to determine at what level costs begin to raise disproportionately to revenues and at what level shortages become critical. The Finance Department hopes to bring a recommendation back to the City Council by mid -year next year, with the findings of the study. Attached, is a comparison of the City of Edina's current and proposed rates with the rates of St. Louis Park, Richfield, and Hopkins. APPENDIX B CITY OF EDINA PAGE 1 OF 2 SEWER 8 WATER RATE STUDY OCTOBER 1989 CITY OF EDINA ST. LOUIS PARK RICHFIELD HOPKINS CURRENT RATES PROPOSED RATES 1600 CUBIC FEET: WATER $8.21 $13.76 $10.24 $6.60 $6.60 FIXED /METER CHARGE 10.79 .00 .00 .00 .00 SEWER 14.11 10.72 20.96 20.50 20.50 $33.11 ------------------ $24.48 ----------- - - - - -- -------- $31.20 --- - - - - -- $27.10 ----------- - - - - -- $27.10 ----------------- 1700 CUBIC FEET: WATER $8.72 514.62 $10.88 56.60 $7.14 FIXED /METER CHARGE 10.79 .00 .00 .00 .00 SEWER 14.99 11.39 22.27 20.50 22.10 $34.51 ------------ - - - - -- ------------------ $26.01 ----------- - - - - -- ----------- ----------- - - - - -- ----------- 533.15 - - - - -- - - - - -- 527.10 ----------- - - - - -- ----------- - - - - -- $29.24 ----------------- --------------- -- 1800 CUBIC FEET: WATER $9.23 $15.48 $11.52 $6.60 $7.56 FIXED /METER CHARGE 10.79 .00 .00 .00 .00 SEWER 15.88 12.06 23.58 20.50 23.40 ------------ ------------ 535.90 - - - - -- - - - - -- $27.54 ----------- - - - - -- ----------- ----------- - - - - -- ----------- $35.10 - - - - -- - - - - -- $27.10 ----------- - - - - -- ----------- - - - - -- $30.96 --------_-------- --------------- -- 1900 CUBIC FEET: WATER $9.75 $16.34 $12.16 $7.60 $7.98 FIXED /METER CHARGE 10.79 .00 .00 .00 .00 SEWER 16.76 12.73 24.89 21.85 24.70 $37.30 $29.07 $37.05 $29.45 $32.68 2400 CUBIC FEET: WATER $12.31 $20.64 $15.36 $9.60 $10.08 FIXED /METER CHARGE 10.79 .00 .00 .00 .00 SEWER 21.17 16.08 31.44 27.60 31.20 544.27 $36.72 $46.80 $37.20 541.28 3000 CUBIC FEET: WATER $15.39 $25.80 $19.20 " $12.00 $12.60 FIXED /METER CHARGE 10.79 .00 .00 .00 .00 SEWER 26.46 20.10 39.30 34.50 39.00 $52.64 $45.90 $58.50 $46.50 $51.60 APPENDIX B CITY OF EDINA PAGE 2 OF 2 SEWER & WATER RATE STUDY OCTOBER 1989 CITY OF EDINA ST. LOUIS PARK RICHFIELD HOPKINS CURRENT RATES PROPOSED RATES 4000 CUBIC FEET: WATER $20.17 $34.40 525.60 $16.00 $16.80 FIXED /METER CHARGE 10.79 .00 .00 .00 .00 SEWER 35.28 26.80 52.40 46.00 52.00 $66.24 $61.20 $78.00 $62.00 $68.80 5000 CUBIC FEET: WATER $24.95 $43.00 $32.00 520.00 $21.00 FIXED /METER CHARGE 10.79 .00 .00 .DO .00 SEWER 44.10 33.50 65.50 57.50 65.00 $79.84 576.50 597.50 $77.50 586.00 6000 CUBIC FEET: WATER 529.73 $51.60 538.40 $24.00 525.20 FIXED /METER CHARGE 10.79 .00 .00 .00 .00 SEWER 52.92 40.20 78.60 69.00 78.00 $93.44 $91.80 $117.00 $93.00 $103.20 7000 CUBIC FEET: WATER $34.51 $60.20 $44.80 $28.00 $29.40 FIXED /METER CHARGE 10.79 .00 .00 .00 .00 SEWER 61.74 46.90 91.70 80.50 91.00 $107.04 $107.10 $136.50 -5108.50 $120.40 SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY SEWER & WATER CHARGES: WATER: $.86 /100 CUFT 5.64 PER 100 CUFT 5.40 PER 100 CUFT 5.42 PER 100 CUFT 1st 3,000 CUFT $.513/100 CUFT NEXT 44,000 CUFT .,$.478/100 CUFT MINIMUM USEAGE MINIMUM USEAGE OVER 47,000 CUFT 5.441/100 CUFT 1,800 CUFT: 1,600 CUFT: $6.60 $6.60 SEWER: 5.926/100 CUFT 5.67/100 CUFT $1.31 PER 100 CUFT $1.15 PER 100 CUFT $1.30 PER 100 CUFT MINIMUM USEAGE MINIMUM USEAGE 1,800 CUFT: 1,600 CUFT: $20.50 $20.50 METER CHARGE ' $4.12 $.00 $.00 a $.00 $.00 FIXED CHARGE $6.67 $.00 $.00 5.00 $.00 STORM DRAINAGE $.00 $6.50 $.00 $5.00 $5.00 A. o e 4 0 • �• �N�bRPOMtbv� lees REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: COUNCIL MEMBERS From MAYOR RICHARDS Date: OCTOBER 13, 1989 Subject: APPOINTMENT TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION Recommendation: Info /Background: Agenda Item # yII.E . Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑• To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Attached is information submitted by Charles S. Ingwalson, 4612 Arden Avenue, whom I am recommending for appointment to the Community Development and Planning Commission, with the consent of the Council. The appointment would fill the unexpired term to 2/1/90 vacated by Del M. Johnson who has moved from the City. October 6, 1989 Charles S. Ingwalson 4612 Arden Avenue Edina, MN 55424 922 -8652 Home 370 -4729 Work Charles Ingwalson is President of First Asset Realty Advisors (FARA) , a wholly owned subsidiary of First Bank System. Mr. Ingwalson has been actively involved in the real estate industry for the past 27 years. Prior to joining FARA in 1984, he spent thirteen years with Norwest Mortgage in a variety of commercial real estate related capacities. His experience includes the acquisition, management and sale of commerical properties as well as mortgage lending. Current responsibilities at FARA in the asset management area include portfolio management, product development and marketing. As a real estate consultant, he has total responsibility for the development and implementation of real estate investment strategies for FARA's clients. Mr. Ingwalson has been a resident of Edina since 1971 when he and his wife Mara purchased their present residence. Their three children, David, Johm and Anne all attended the Edina school system. Mr. Ingwalson is a graduate of The University of North Dakota (BS) and a past president of The Minnesota Mortgage Bankers Association. He is a member of The Pension Real Estate Association and The National Association of Industrial and Office Parks, as well as the Edina Country Club and The Colonial Church of Edina. A. 2it o e 1 cn Hr� 10 \,�RPOMT�v/ 1000 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: .KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Date: OCTOBER 12, 1989 Subject: OFF -SALE BEER LICENSE FOR COUNTRY STORE Recommendation: Agenda Item # VII.F Consent 0 Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action F] Motion . ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Approval of issuance of an off -sale 3.2 beer license to the Country Store located at 6775 York Avenue South. Info /Background: Staff has been informed that the Red Owl Country Store, located at 6775 York Avenue, is proposed to be under new ownership as of November 6, 1989. According to ordinance requirements, licenses cannot be transferred. The new owner, Jerry's Enterprises, has submitted an application for an off -sale 3.2 beer license at that location. (The Red Owl Country Store currently holds.an off -sale beer license.) The application has been reviewed by the Police Department and approval is recommended. A. O e P t4 Cn •'��RPow. -I • lees REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland Agenda Item # VII. 'G. From: David A. Velde Consent ❑X Information Only ❑ Date: October 16, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: 1990 Laboratory Service © To Council Agreement Action ❑Motion El Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adopt a resolution approving the 1990 Laboratory Services Agreement with Hennepin County Info /Background This is an annual agreement whereby the City of Edina agrees to provide laboratory services to Hennepin County for food and water samples. The agreement sets forth a maximum dollar amount of $2,000.00 for 1990. The testing is billed to the County on a cost per sample basis established by the City of Edina. RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that it hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor and Manager to execute, on behalf of the City, the Environmental Health Services Agreement between the County of Hennepin and the City of Edina, for the period of January 1, 1990 through December 31, 1990, to enable Hennepin County to purchase laboratory support services through the Edina Tri -City Laboratory. ADOPTED this 16th day of October, 1989. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution is a true and correct copy-of the resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 16, 1989 and as recorded in the'Minutes of said Regular Meeting. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk O oech �° REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Jose To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER Agenda Item # __YII.x From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Consent F_x] Information Only ❑ Date: OCTOBER 12, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: TEMPORARY ON -SALE ® To Council LIQUOR LICENSE FOR EDINAMITE Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Council approval for issuance of a temporary On -sale Liquor License to The Edina Foundation in connection with EDINAMITE (Dynamite Jazz '89) to be held on November 18, 1989. Info /Background: The Edina Foundation has applied for a temporary On -sale Liquor License in connection with EDINAMITE to be held at Edinborough Park on November 18. The application complies with the requirements of Ordinance No. 902 concerning a temporary on -sale liquor license and will be issued under the license of Interlachen Country Club as has been done in past years. A. ow e P Cn • RpoM�sv • lase REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Date: OCTOBER 12, 1989 Subject: HEARING DATE FOR BEER LICENSE FEES Recommendation: Agenda Item # vII.I. Consent Information Only ❑. Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA FE To Council Action F_x] Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion That a hearing date of 11/06/89 be set to consider an increase in beer license fees. Info /Background: Staff is proposing an increase in beer license fees to recover increased staff costs in issuing the license and regulation. A hearing date of November 6, 1989 is recommended_ for Council's consideration of the proposed license fees. Affected licensees are being noticed as required. (Staff has been advised that the 1989 legislation requiring a public hearing for proposed increases in liquor and on -sale wine licenses includes 3.2 beer licenses as well.) , Agenda Item VIII.A L.A. LAUKKA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY October 11, 1989 Mr. Gordon Hughes "Assistant City Manager City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street - Edina, MN 55424 RE: Centennial Lakes - Phase IV :Dear Gordon: We have been unable to achieve enough Centennial Lakes Phase IV' presales the in semi - luxury condominium building to proceed. Few of those that had exhibited an interest in this concept were willing, when pressed, to purchase without seeing the product constructed and the development in place. Prices may have contributed to their dilemma too, maybe we will try again next year when we consider phase VI. We would like to initiate construction of the fourth building yet this year and propose that we do so as an elevator building - same as phase III. There is sufficient contractable interest to do this again and like phase III an additional $100,000.00 of capital pool funds will inure to the benefit of II and V. -Please advise the City Council of this decision and let me know what to do next. Sincerely, Larry La kka LL /cb 3300 EDINBOROUGH WAY - SUITE 201 - EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 - TELEPHONE 612/896 -1971 October 3, 1989 Dear City Official: Agenda Item IX.A The attached Legislative Policies have been recommended by the five AMM standing policy committees for adoption by the Board of Directors and General Membership as additions and /or revised AMM Legislative Policy for the 1990 Legislative Session. The Board of Directors will be meeting in about ten days to review and consider these Policies and any changes made by the Board will be forwarded to you as soon as possible thereafter. Policies adopted last year for 1989 -1990 continue for 1990 except for those recommended for change by this year's action. The General Membership meeting to consider and approve these Policies has been set for Thursday evening, November 2, 1989. We will be sendi -ng you more detailed information concerning this meeting.in the near future but please reserve this date on your calendar now. We are sending the proposed policies now to give.you and your council as much time as possible to peruse and discuss the various policy recommendations. Policy adoption at this meeting requires a majority vote of those present. Each city except Bloomington has two votes, St. Paul and Minneapolis has seven votes because of Populations. We look forward to your acti, this very important part of the AMM policy Respectfully, 4 AO* Walt Fehst, President Association of Metropolitan Municipalities two thirds has one vote has five votes their larger . ie participation in process.. 183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227 -4008 t s P R O P O S E D A D D E N D U M T 0 P O L I C I E S A N D L E G .I.S L A T I V E P R O P O S A L S 1990 SEPTEMBER 29, 1989 s. 183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227 -5600 MUNICIPAL REVENUE AND TAXATION 90 -11 MANDATED STATE AND FEDERAL PROGRAMS (I -B -3) The cost of local government is being influenced more and more by both state and federally legislated mandated programs and increased mandated benefits or costs for in -place programs'. Due to current levy limitation restrictions, the ability of local government to pay these increased costs is severely restricted, thereby causing in many instances, a reduction in the level of the traditional service functions of police, fire, street, etc. There is a vast .range of. mandated program increases which have no bearing or relationship to the annually allowed levy limit increase. Some of these include worker's compensation benefits, .binding 'arbitration, federal 'social security, minimum wage laws, comprehensive planning, Critical Areas Act, Shorelines Act, OSHA, etc. THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO RECOGNIZE THAT MANDATED INCREASED EXPENDITURES IN.ONE PROGRAM WITHOUT A CORRESPONDING INCREASE IN FUNDING ABILITY MANDATES A DECREASED EXPENDITURE IN THE OTHER SERVICE AREAS SUCH AS PUBLIC SAFETY ETC. THEREFORE, WHEN NEW PROGRAMS OR INCREASES TO EXISTING PROGRAMS ARE MANDATED, THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD PROVIDE SUBSTANTIAL STATE FUNDING ASSISTANCE ALONG WITH, AS APPROPRIATE, A PERMANENT LEVY LIMIT BASE INCREASE TO OFFSET THE NEW COSTS. 90 -12 PROPERTY TAX REFORM - TIF HOUSING The new property tax aid system eliminates payments to local government to offset homestead credit to homeowners. This elimination has created a significant financial problem for cities that created TIF Housing Districts to help eliminate delapidated housing stock in blighted areas. Without the full increment, including the amount for homestead credit, many areas are having to levy additional property tax to pay the TIF bonds. In some cases the levy amount is very significant, i.e., up to a 20% across the board tax increase. Since these districts were undertaken in good faith to alleviate a public safety problem, it is unreasonable for the legislature to unduly penalize taxpayers in these cities because of a change in tax methodology. Therefore; THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO CREATE.A SPECIAL TRANSITION AID FUND TO OFFSET THE DECREASED HOMESTEAD CREDIT PAYMENTS FOR TIF HOUSING DISTRICTS TO ENSURE THAT OTHER TAXPAYERS ARE NOT PENALIZED BY HAVING TO PAY A SPECIAL LEVY FOR TIF BONDED DEBT PAYMENTS. 90 -13 FISCAL DISPARITIES (I -F) Starting with the 1987 tax bill, the legislature has systematically begun making major changes to the Minnesota property tax system. The Homestead Credit has been changed to an aid and reduced, aid distribution between types of local government and among regions is changing, and classification rates se and ratios to determine taxable value and relative tax are being modified annually. All of these changes will have an impact on the operation of the Fiscal Disparities program but because of the interactiveness of one change upon another, it is difficult to assess the total impact or change in the relative contribution and distr- ibution of fiscal disparities tax base. Thus, it seems inappropriate to continue pursuit of a major change to the fiscal disparities program until the proposed changes can be analyzed as they would interact with the property tax system changes of 1989 -1990. Therefore, THE AMM REQUESTS THAT NO CHANGES BE MADE TO THE FISCAL DISPARITIES PROGRAM UNTIL THE CURRENT PROPERTY 'TAX REFORM MEASURES ARE IN PLACE AND THE IMPACT ON FISCAL DISPARITIES CAN BE DETERMINED. STUDY SHOULD CONTINUE AS TO THE INTERACTION AND IMPACT OF FISCAL ,DISPARITIES WITH THE NEW TAX LAW. -2- 2 GENERAL LEGISLATION 90 -21 PICKET LINES (A -3) PUBLIC EMPLOYEES SHOULD NOT BE GIVEN THE RIGHT TO REFUSE TO CROSS A PICKET LINE. F 90 -22 PART TIME EMPLOYEES (A -5) THE AMM RECOMMENDS THAT THE LEGISLATURE REINSTATE THE PREVIOUS DEFINITION OF EMPLOYEES COVERED BY PELRA TO BE 'PERSONS EMPLOYED FOR MORE THAN 100 DAYS IN A CALENDAR YEAR' INSTEAD OF THE CURRENT 67 DAYS. 90 -23 DATA PRIVACY AND OPEN MEETING (II -C) Data privacy laws protect individuals from the release of information to the public which the legislature has deemed to be private or which could be unnecessarily harmful to the individual. On the other hand, the open meeting iaw prohibits local government units from holding closed sessions except when discussing pending or actual lawsuits. with an attorney or labor negotiations. Unfortunately, many occasions have arisen in past years where local units in dealing with individuals or employee disciplinary matters have been forced to either violate the Data Privacy Statutes or the Open Meeting Statute in order to fairly resolve the issue. The Minnesota Supreme Court in early 1989 finally resolved the conflict between the two laws and did so by establishing a clearly followed rule. When 'not public data' comes before public bodies, either the data must not be released or the meeting must be closed. THE AMM SUPPORTS CONTINUING T, HE RULE INITIATED BY THE SUPREME COURT IN THE ANNANDALE ADVOCATE DECISION THAT MEETINGS OF PUBLIC BODIES MUST BE CLOSED WHEN DATA CLASSIFIED AS OTHER THAN PUBLIC IS .TO BE DISCUSSED. IF THE LEGISLATURE DOES MODIFY THE LAW IT SHOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH THE ANNANDALE DECISION. 90 -24 CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE BONDS (II -I) The 1989 legislature modified Minnesota Statutes 574.26 to allow contractors to provide a letter of credit instead of a performance bond for contracts of less than $50,000. This is an improvement but still will create significant hardship with many .reputable small contractors. In todays market, projects in excess of $50,000 are very common and are not really large jobs. The emphasis should be in protecting the public. THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO PROVIDE GREATER FLEXIBILITY IN -3- CONTRACTOR GUARANTEES FOR CITIES BY ALLOWING IN ADDITION TO BONDS,' OTHER RELIABLE FINANCIAL SECURITY GUARANTEES, SUCH AS LETTERS OF CREDIT, WITHOUT LIMITATION AS TO PROJECT COSTS. 90 -25 DATA PRACTICES - GENERAL PUBLIC DATA The Government Data Practices Act allows municipalities to charge the actual costs of searching for, retrieving, and copying public data if copies of the data are requested. The law prohibits municipalities from charging the costs of searching for and retrieving data if a person asks only to inspect it. In many cases, the searching and retrieving are the most time - consuming aspects of supplying data. Making a copy is frequently only a small portion of the time required and should not be the .standard for determining whether a charge is appropriate. Profit - making enterprises have used this free service to augment their businesses. For example, individuals have established businesses for preparing special assessment searches. Personnel from these businesses use city facilities, including expensive computer equipment, to obtain the special assessment data.. The personnel may also take significant amounts of staff time for explanations of the data collected. They then dominate the publicly provided telephone for lengthly period- to transmit the information obtained. These businesses use city facilities and personnel as part of a profit- making enterprise, solely at taxpayer expense. Municipalities should be allowed to charge for retrieving and explaining public data whether or not. the request includes copying. The law also prohibits municipalities from charging for separating public from non - public data. This task may be very time- comsuming and is necessary to protect the non - public. data. Municipalities should be allowed to charge for this service. To preserve the Act's spirit and intent of keeping government records open to inspection for public purposes, the new charges proposed would not apply to the media or to private citizens requesting information about themselves or their own properties. THE AMM ENCOURAGES THE LEGISLATURE TO AMEND MINN. STAT. 13.031 SUBD. 3 TO ALLOW MUNICIPALITIES TO CHARGE FOR RETRIEVING AND EXPLAINING PUBLIC DATA AND FOR SEPARATING PUBLIC FROM NON- PUBLIC DATA. THIS AMENDMENT WOULD NOT APPLY, HOWEVER, TO THE MEDIA OR TO PRIVATE CITIZENS REQUESTING INFORMATION ABOUT THEMSELVES OF THEIR OWN PROPERTIES. 90 -26 (II -G) COMPARABLE WORTH The Minnesota Pay Equity Law mandated in 1984 that public employers conduct a comparable worth study and report the results -4- to the state. Cities have consistently demonstrated their continuing support of the concept and objectives of the law by: - Virtually all of the 1,600 public agencies required to do so have completed pay equity studies and submitted their reports to the state in accordance with statute. -For each of these public agencies, first year implementation costs were between 2% and 7% of payroll. This is a significant continuing expenditure to each public.agency. -To complete the mandated study, public agencies have invested between $2,000 to $20,000 each, either in staff time or consultant services or both. Additional costs will accrue for continuous updates. -Most agencies schedule pay equity implementation by the state mandated December 31, 1991, deadline or sooner. -Pay equity has provided municipalities with a rational basis for community employee compensation and classification systems. The Commissioner of the Department of Employee Relations has stated that there is no problem with pay equity implementation in the .vast majority of cases. . To enhance the enforceability of the statute, the legislature in 1987 adopted a requirement that all plans be fully implemented no later than December 31, 1991, and imposed financial penalties for noncompliance 'within that time frame. In the meantime,. alleged pay inequities can be resolved through 1) The Department of Human Rights process; 2) Court system; or 3) Arbitration. Finally, there has been no systematic research done by either the Department of Human Rights or Department of Employee Relations to statistically substantiate widespread pay equity implementation problems. At this time it is too early to consider changes to the pay equity law. Most units are in the implementation process, mainly using a three year phased program. The cities and the legislature need time to analyze the results of the implementation. To change rules, criteria, definition or mandates in mid stream will only cause more confusion, more unnecessary expense and in many cases delays. The legislature needs to provide the tools (ability to raise the dollars needed) and the time for local units to comply willingly. THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE: TO PROVIDE LEVY BASE ADJUSTMENTS FOR PAY EQUITY IMPLEMENTATION; TO NOT ENDANGER ECONOMIC AND EFFICIENT PROVISION OF PUBLIC -5- SERVICES BY PROHIBITING PRIVATIZATION OR JOINT POWERS AGREEMENTS FOR VARIOUS SERVICES. THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD NOT MANDATE THAT PUBLIC AGENCIES ARE TO BE THE VEHICLE TO IMPLEMENT PAY EQUITY IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR THROUGH CONTRACT COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS; AND TO NOT MAKE CHANGES IN THE LAW UNTIL THE CURRENT IMPLEMENTATION DEADLINE, DECEMBER 31, 19919 HAS ELAPSED. IN THE INTERIM, THE DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYEE RELATIONS SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO REVIEW ITS PAY EQUITY REPORT FILES - TO.IDENTIFY STATISTICALLY THE NATURE AND NUMBER. OF PROBLEMS WHICH EXIST IN ACHIEVING STATE -WIDE PAY EQUITY OBJECTIVES. THIS DATA, COUPLED WITH PUBLIC AGENCY EXPERIENCE IN IMPLEMENTING COMPARABLE WORTH PLANS WILL PROVIDE THE BASIS FOR A COOPERATIVE REVIEW BY DOER AND PUBLIC AGENCIES TO DETERMINE THE NEED FOR REFINEMENTS TO THE PAY EQUITY LAW. IF THE LEGISLATURE ELECTS TO CHANGE THE LAW THEN THE FOLLOWING GUIDELINES SHOULD BE USED: COMPARABLE WORTH INVOLVES ALL PUBLIC EMPLOYEES, MALE AND FEMALE, OCCUPING ALL TYPES OF PUBLIC SECTOR .POSITIONS. TRUE COMPARABLE WORTH IMPLEMENTATION MUST THEREFORE INCLUDE ALL MALE, FEMALE AND BALANCED JOB CLASSES - IT IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO CONCENTRATE ON ONE CLASS OVER ANOTHER. THE APPROACH TO COMPARABLE WORTH SHOULD BE COMPREHENSIVE, DEALING WITH ALL EMPLOYEES AT ALL RANKS REGARDLESS OF SEX. THIS IS THE ONLY EQUITABLE APPROACH. ONE OF THE PRIMARY OBSTACLES BLOCKING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPARABLE WORTH IS THE EXISTING STATE STATUTES WHICH DEFINE CERTAIN EMPLOYEES AS ESSENTIAL AND OTHERS AS NON- ESSENTIAL AND REQUIRE IMPLEMENTATION OF PAY EQUITY TO BE COLLECTIVELY BARGAINED. ESSENTIAL EMPLOYEES DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO STRIKE, BUT MAY UTILIZE BINDING ARBITRATION. ARBITRATORS ARE NOT BOUND TO CONSIDER THE RESULTS OF COMPARABLE WORTH STUDIES. THIS CREATES A SPECIAL CLASS OF EMPLOYEES WITH UNIQUE BARGAINING LEVERAGE. HISTORY DEMONSTRATES THAT THIS LEVERAGE HAS RESULTED IN HIGHER WAGES TO ESSENTIAL EMPLOYEES THAN NON- ESSENTIAL EMPLOYEES. THIS INEQUITY MUST BE DISCONTINUED IN ORDER FOR FULL IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPARABLE WORTH TO OCCUR. ARBITRATORS AND NEGOTIATORS SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO CONSIDER COMPARABLE WORTH RESULTS FOR ALL EMPLOYEE GROUPS. IF THIS DOES NOT OCCUR, ARBITRATION AWARDS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ALLOWABLE EXCEPTIONS TO PAY EQUITY IMPLEMENTATION. THERE SHOULD BE NO LIMITATION ON THE TOOLS AVAILABLE TO PUBLIC AGENCIES TO IMPLEMENT PAY EQUITY INCLUDING ACCELERATING OR DECELERATING SALARY INCREASES, JOB RESTRUCTURING, PRIVATE CONTRACTING, AND OTHER STRATEGIES. WHILE PRIMARY CONSIDERATION NEEDS TO BE GIVEN TO COMPARABLE JOB VALUE, MARKET CONDITIONS MUST ALSO BE CONSIDERED. THIS IS NECESSARY BOTH TO ASSURE THAT MUNICIPALITIES ARE ABLE TO CONTINUE TO RECRUIT AND RETAIN QUALIFIED CANDIDATES AND TO ASSURE THAT a CLASSIFICATIONS SIMILAR TO PRIVATE SECTOR JOBS ARE NOT PAID INORDINATELY HIGHER WAGES THAN THOSE PAID IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR. PAY FOR PERFORMANCE IS AN OBJECTIVE AS FUNDAMENTAL AS COMPARABLE WORTH. THE OBJECTIVE SHOULD CONTINUE TO BE TO PAY INDIVIDUALS ON THE BASIS OF THEIR PERFORMANCE AND WORK VALUE. CHANGES SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED WHICH UNDERMINE PAY FOR PERFORMANCE PRINCIPLES AND IN EFFECT MAKE PAY FOR PERFORMANCE AN EXCEPTION WHICH MUST BE -- JUSTIFIED WHEN USED. INSTEAD, PAY FOR PERFORMANCE SHOULD BE THE NORM USED FOR ADJUSTING EMPLOYEE SALARIES. ANY DEFINITION OF PAY EQUITY IMPLEMENTATION MUST RECOGNIZE AND ACCEPT AS APPROPRIATE DIFFERENCES IN EMPLOYEE PAY OCCASIONED BY TIME IN POSITION, MARKET, PAY FOR PERFORMANCE PRINCIPLES AND CONTRACT'SETTLEMENTS. IT MUST ALSO RECOGNIZE AND GIVE CREDIT FOR GOOD FAITH IMPLEMENTATION EFFORTS AND THE FACT THAT COMPARABLE WORTH IMPLEMENTATION IS AN ONGOING EFFORT. EACH TIME A SALARY CHANGES, SO TOO DOES THE PAY STRUCTURE OF THE ORGANIZATION. MUNICIPALITIES MUST THEREFORE EXAMINE THEIR PAY PLANS REGULARLY TO ASSURE THAT THEIR PAY PLAN AND POLICIES ENSURE ACHIEVEMENT OF COMPARABLE WORTH INSOFAR AS POSSIBLE. IF A GOVERNMENTAL UNIT- CAN DEMONSTRATE A GOOD FAITH EFFORT AND CONTINUED PROGRESS TOWARD ACHIEVEMENT OF PAY EQUITY, NO PENALTY SHOULD BE ASSESSED. 90 -27 CONCURRENT DETACHMENT AND ANNEXATION (II -N•) Prior to 1985 the changing of municipal boundaries initiated by property owners was limited to the single case where their property was totally surrounded by another community. The 1985 legislation opened the possibility up to all property owners to initiate such action. This broad 'based allowance is problematic in some instances because of the City expense and intercity divisiveness that it causes. IT IS THE POLICY OF THE AMM THAT THE PROVISION ALLOWING PROPERTY OWNERS TO PETITION FOR ANNEXATION BE MODIFIED TO ALLOW PETITIONING UNDER ANY OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA. -THE PROPERTY OWNERS HAVE BEEN DENIED A REASONABLE USE OF THEIR LAND WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH AND ALLOWED UNDER THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING ORDINANCE. THE PROPERTY OWNERS HAVE NOT BEEN DENIED A REASONABLE USE IF THE PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT HAS BEEN DEFERRED PURSUANT TO A PHASING OR STAGING PLAN. -THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DOES NOT ACCOUNT FOR SIGNIFICANT BARRIERS SEPARATING THIS LAND FROM SERVICE FROM THE CURRENT COMMUNITY INCLUDING ANY ABILITY TO ACCESS ITS STREET SYSTEM. :FC - PROPERTY OWNERS HAVE PAID FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR SERVICE BUT DUE TO ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE GOVERNING BODY ARE PROHIBITED FROM ANY CONNECTION TO THAT SYSTEM. t„ BEFORE PROPERTY OWNERS INITIATE PROCEEDINGS UNDER THESE CONDITIONS THEY MUST UNDERTAKE A PROFESSIONAL PLANNING FEASIBILITY STUDY TO BE CONDUCTED BY A CONSULTANT TO BE SELECTED AND PAID FOR BY THE PROPERTY OWNERS. THE CURRENT COMMUNITY MUST APPROVE THE SELECTION OF THE CONSULTANT OR OFFER AN ALTERNATIVE CONSULTANT ACCEPTABLE TO THE PROPERTY OWNERS. IF AGREEMENT CANNOT BE REACHED, THE MUNICIPAL BOARD SHALL APPROVE A CONSULTANT. THE STUDY SHOULD EXAMINE THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY AND THE RAMIFICATIONS OF DETACHMENT AND ANNEXATION. THE STUDY SHOULD ADDRESS PHYSICAL PLANNING ISSUES, DELIVERY OF SERVICE AND ANY .FINANCIAL RAMIFICATIONS TOGETHER WITH ANY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN. THE PROPOSED PLAN FOR THE PROPERTY SHALL BE PRESENTED TO THE CURRENT. COMMUNITY. IF REJECTED BY THE CURRENT COMMUNITY, THE PROPERTY OWNERS SHALL PRESENT THE PLAN TO THE OTHER COMMUNITY. PRIOR TO A HEARING IN FRONT OF THE MUNICIPAL BOARD, AFTER THE PETITION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, THERE SHALL BE A PERIOD TO ALLOW FOR MEDIATION BY THE CITIES. FAILING A MEDIATED RESULT, A REVIEW SHALL BE CONDUCTED BY THE REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION(S) OR METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WHERE THE CITIES ARE LOCATED. COMMENTS WILL THEN BE FORWARDED TO THE MUNICIPAL BOARD FOR CONSIDERATION. THE MUNICIPAL BOARD'S DECISION MUST BE BASED ON A BALANCING OF THE INTERESTS OF BOTH MUNICIPALITIES AND THE PROPERTY OWNERS. FACTORS TO CONSIDER SHOULD INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO: -THE EXTENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES THAT CAN BE PROVIDED BY EACH MUNICIPALITY; -THE FINDINGS OF THE REGIONAL PLANNING AUTHORITY REGARDING THE IMPACT ON THE REGIONAL SYSTEMS; , -THE ECONOMIC IMPACT ON EACH COMMUNITY AND THE PROPERTY OWNERS; -THE EXISTENCE OF PHYSICAL• BARRIERS WHICH SEPARATE THE PROPERTY FROM THE REMAINDER OF THE CURRENT MUNICIPALITY BUT NOT THE PROPOSED MUNICIPALITY; AND - ADDITIONAL CRITERIA INCLUDED IN MS 414.041, SUBDIVISION 5. U-11 3 HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 90 -30 TAX INCREMENT FINANCE (III B -4) Tax increment finance (TIF) has enabled cities to plan and carry out housing, economic development, and redevelopment projects on their own initiative. TIF_ represents the most feasible and effective strategy or tool presently exercised by cities to preserve and improve their. own physical and economic environment. TIF is virtually the only tool available to most cities for positive self intervention to curb the spread of blight and to encourage and manage sound economic development which is so vital to provide jobs and to maintain a healthy tax base. THE AMM. ENCOURAGES THE LEGISLATURE TO .RECOGNIZE THAT TIF IS THE CORNERSTONE OF THE ECONOMIC VIABILITY FOR MANY CITIES THROUGHOUT MINNESOTA. THE LEGISLATURE MUST ALSO RECOGNIZE THAT TIF (1) IS USED STATEWIDE, (2) IS EQUALLY IMPORTANT STATEWIDE AND (3) MUST NOT BE DEALT WITH ON ANYTHING LESS THAN A STATEWIDE BASIS. UNDER THE GUISE OF REFORM SIGNIFICANT AMENDMENTS HAVE PASSED IN RECENT SESSIONS WHICH HAVE FURTHER RESTRICTED THE ABILITY OF CITIES TO USE TIF. THE AMM IS WILLING TO COOPERATE WITH OTHER GROUPS AND THE LEGISLATURE IN AN IMPARTIAL AND THOROUGH REVIEW OF TIF TO DETERMINE WHAT IMPROVEMENTS ARE NECESSARY TO. CONTINUE ITS CREDIBILITY. AND SUPPORT SO THAT IT CAN REMAIN-AN USEFUL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TOOL. 90 -31 COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITIES (EDA'S) Some County Officials through the Minnesota Association of Counties are asking that Counties be given EDA authority similar to cities. A bill was introduced in the 1989 Session to grant such authority. There may be areas of the state, particularly in Greater Minnesota, where it makes sense to do economic development projects on a larger geographic basis such as a County. Such rationale does not exist in the seven county area in the AMM's judgement. THE AMM DOES NOT OPPOSE THE GRANTING OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TO COUNTIES BUT BELIEVES SUCH AUTHORITY IS NOT NEEDED FOR COUNTIES IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA SINCE IT WOULD-BE DUPLICATION OF AUTHORITY PRESENTLY EXERCISED BY CITIES. HOWEVER, IF SUCH AUTHORITY IS GRANTED TO METROPOLITAN COUNTIES IT MUST HAVE TWO LIMITS: (1) A COUNTY CAN NOT DO A PROJECT OR (2) LEVY AN ,EDA TAX IN A CITY WITHOUT CITY GOVERNMENT APPROVAL. 90 -32 HAZARDOUS SITE CLEAN -UP LOAN FUND Minnesota cities have encountered difficulty in financing the redevelopment of sites that require clean up of chemical contamination. An obvious source to evaluate for its potential as the necessary provider of additional funds is the state and federal superfund. However, the Superfund is a very limited resource which is only available to deal with the most seriously polluted sites presenting immediate health hazards. It will not be available within the foreseeable future to address the growing number of polluted sites that are encountered in the redevelopment process, and that are characterized by relatively lower levels of contamination and less immediate threats to public health. The limitations of available redevelopment financing tools are such that they are not effective for contaminated sites without the infusion of an additional source of funds. To date, that source of additional funds has not been available. The inability to clean up and redevelop contaminated sites has significant negative leffects on the area in which the sites are located, and has broad implications for general public health and safety. A mechanism for treatment and redevelopment of affected sites must be implemented. THE AMM REQUESTS LEGISLATION THAT WOULD ESTABLISH A STATE HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE LOAN FUND TO PROVIDE LOANS TO MUNICIPALITIES FOR THE PURPOSE OF CORRECTING EXISTING HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE PROBLEMS.WHICH PREVENT DEVELOPMENT OF A SITE. 90 -33 LAND USE PLANNING (III -C) Land use regulation by cities in the Metropolitan Area has been governed by the Municipal Planning Act (MS 462) and the Metropolitan Land Planning ,Act (MS 473). While not a perfect framework, these acts have worked well for the vast majority of cities in the metropolitan area. Land use control for cities is more than just one of the many powers and occupies a significant part of the work of city councils and their staff. It has a significant impact on other community regulations, tax base, economic development and redevelopment. It is a driving force for creating service needs. Land use regulation is the common thread which runs through most of a city's functions and operations. The legislation sponsored by the Governor's Advisory Committee on state local - relations (ACSLR) and introduced in, the last two sessions. would have. substantially altered the overall .land use control framework including: 1. Diluting the authority of local elected officials thereby reducing local accountability, particularly in the use of- Conditional Use Permits and Variances. -10- ,. 2. Establishing a new legal framework which would render moot much of the existing case law and existing codes and ordinances. 3. Leaving out significant aspects of present law which allows local officials the discretion to manage development in their cities. The proposed law may be well intentioned in attempting to create uniform land use rules 'for counties, towns, and cities rather than the present diverse enabling laws. However, need for such a mayor change has not been demonstrated at least for metropolitan cities. The proposal also does not adequately address the interface between the State Act and the Metropolitan Land Planning Act. The AMM through a special task force has been involved in this proposed revision to the state's land use planning enabling statutes for two years. Significant improvements have been made to the proposal as a result of this involvement but problems still remain and the AMM may not support passage during the 1990 legislative session. THE .AMM DOES NOT BELIEVE THAT MAJOR CHANGE IS NEEDED IN THE STATUTES WHICH GOVERN MUNICIPAL LAND USE PLANNING AND REGULATION. THE AMM OPPOSES CHANGES WHICH WOULD REDUCE LOC -AL FLEXIBILITY AND MANY OF THE CHANGES CONTAINED IN THE ACSLR SPONSORED LEGISLATION ARE MORE PRESCRIPTIVE THAN CURRENT LAW. THE AMM DOES NOT BELIEVE THAT UNIFORMITY FOR THE SAKE OF UNIFORMITY IN STATE STATUTES GOVERNING MUNICIPAL LAND. USE CONTROLS PROVIDES SUBSTANTIAL BENEFITS TO AMM MEMBERS. THE AMM WOULD SUPPORT LEGISLATION CONTAINING MORE EXPLICIT AUTHORITY FOR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES PROVIDED SUCH AUTHORITY IS PERMISSIVE. THE AMM WOULD NOT OPPOSE MODIFICATION OF STANDARDS FOR GRANTING VARIANCES AND ADJUSTMENTS AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE CURRENT RIGID STANDARDS CONTAINED IN STATUTES. ANY SUCH STATE ENABLING LEGISLATION MUST ADDRESS THE INTERFACE WITH AND ELIMINATE CONFLICT WITH THE METROPOLITAN LAND PLANNING ACT. THE COSTS TO LOCAL UNITS TO IMPLEMENT SUCH LAW SHOULD ALSO BE REIMBURSED. 90 -34 STATE LICENSED RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES (GROUP HOMES) (III -D) The AMM believes that persons with disabilities are entitled to live in the least restrictive possible environment and should have a range of residential choices throughout the state. The AMM also believes that residential based facilities (i.e. Group Homes) should not be concentrated.. Over- concentration of such facilities could have a negative impact on the community and on the facility residents. Recent amendments to the Federal Fair Housing Act may have an.impact on the State's ability to regulate residential based facilities. However, the AMM believes that the principles - 11 - contained in this policy are very appropriate and if state legislation is pursued it should not conflict with the AMM principles. The residents of residential based facilities come from our communities and the AMM believes that cities as one of the major institutions of our society have a responsibility to be a part of the solution by-welcoming such facilities on a rational basis. The AMM believes that cities have a responsibility to be part of the solution, but it also believes that the state has the major responsibility to assure that the residents living in residential based facilities receive care and supervision appropriate to the extent of their disability. The state's deinstitutionalization policy is directly linked to the need for more residential based care facilities in our cities and the state has the responsibility to provide sufficient funding to assure adequate care and supervision of the residents placed in such facilities. The state also has the responsibility to notify a city when such a facility is licensed so that the city is prepared to deal with emergencies that might occur in such a facility. The AMM also believes that the state has a responsibility to screen clients, particularly in the corrections area, so that persons placed in residential based facilities are not a danger to themselves, fellow residents, or the community. THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD ADHERE TO THE FOLLOWING PRINCIPLES WHEN DEALING WITH THE ISSUES OF DE INSTITUTIONALIZATION AND RESIDENTIAL BASED FACILITIES: -THERE MUST BE TIMELY NOTIFICATION TO CITIES WHEN A RESIDENTIAL FACILITY LICENSE IS ISSUED OR RENEWED IN ORDER TO PROVIDE THE CITY ADEQUATE OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND. -STEPS MUST BE TAKEN TO AVOID THE CLUSTERING OF COMMUNITY RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES ATTRIBUTABLE TO ECONOMIC, GEOGRAPHIC OR PROGRAMMATIC EXPEDIENCE. STANDARDS OF NONCONCENTRATION FOR THE STATE OR FOR COUNTY- ISSUED RFP'S SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED. IN ADDITION, FINANCIAL INCENTIVE PROGRAMS FOR PROVIDERS LOCATING IN NON- CONCENTRATED AREAS SHOULD BE EXPLORED. -THERE MUST BE ADEQUATE STATE FUNDING SO THAT THE RESIDENTS OF THESE FACILITIES RECEIVE PROPER CARE AND SUPERVISION. -THERE MUST BE A REALISTIC ONGOING SCREENING PROCESS TO ASSURE THAT PERSONS PLACED IN A RESIDENTIAL FACILITY WILL BENEFIT FROM SUCH LIVING ENVIRONMENT AND WILL NOT BE A DANGER TO THEMSELVES OR OTHERS. THE LICENSING AUTHORITY MUST BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING -12- ANY PERSONS FOUND INCAPABLE OF CONTINUING IN SUCH ENVIRONMENT. - FACILITIES LICENSED BY'THE CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT SHOULD NOT BE EXEMPT FROM REASONABLE'LOCAL LAND USE REGULATIONS. -ANY LEGISLATION EFFECTING LAND USE CONTROLS SHOULD BE EXPRESSED IN TERMINOLOGY CONSISTENT WITH LOCAL LAND USE CONTROLS. 90 -36 NEIGHBORHOOD LIVEABILITY Rapidly evolving social, demographic, economic and behavorial changes are converging on many cities creating new challenges that exceed their capacity to deal effectively with their new environments. These forces are having an immediate and drastic impact on certain neighborhoods. For example, affected cities are experiencing increased demands for public safety and protective inspection services at a time when their residential tax base is eroding. High rental vacancies and dilapidated housing make maintenance of housing stock especially difficult.. Also, aging housing stock is not being rehabilitated, but abandoned. Growing concentration of low income households, many of whom are minorities, raise particular challenges. Drugs and criminal activity discourage many from locating in areas offering affordable housing. Additional human service and educational needs are experienced by community . agencies and- school. Finally, the 'flight of avoidance' by families and businesses that give diversity, strength and leadership to the community i.s creating long -term problems that need to be addressed immediately. These combinations of challenges exceed many communities' financial and staffing-capabilities to resolve the issues at hand. These problems, if not adequately addressed, will spread to other cities, resulting in premature economic losses; i.e., property equity, long -term community instability, and the under utilization of public infrastructure. THE CHALLENGES CITIES FACE WITH DETERIORATING NEIGHBORHOODS, CRIME, AND DRUGS NEED THE COOPERATIVE EFFORTS OF PUBLIC, PRIVATE, AND BUSINESS INTERESTS TO SOLVE. CITIES HAVE EXPANDED PUBLIC SAFETY, INSPECTION, AND HEALTH PROGRAMS; HAVE AGGRESSIVELY REPAIRED AND REPLACED INFRASTRUCTURE; I.E., REPLACED STREETS AND PUBLIC UTILITY LINES; HAVE REMOVED DISEASED TREES, REDEVELOPED .PARKS, REFURBISHED OR REPLACED NEIGHBORHOOD CIVIC FACILITIES; AND HAVE DEVELOPED PROGRAMS TO ASSIST LOW AND MODERATE INCOME FAMILIES, YET PROBLEMS CONTINUE TO GROW. CITIES SHOULD TAKE THE LEAD IN DEVELOPING STRATEGIES ON HOW BEST TO DEAL WITH THE ISSUES. FOR EXAMPLE, INCREASED LEVELS OF PUBLIC SAFETY, PROTECTIVE INSPECTION,. EDUCATIONAL, AND RECREATIONAL -13- SERVICES NEED TO BE ESTABLISHED AT TARGETED AREAS AND PROBLEMS. STATE AID AND GRANT PROGRAMS SHOULD BE ALLOCATED TO CITIES, COUNTIES, AND SCHOOLS TO ASSIST IN THE DELIVERY OF BASE LINE SERVICES. TO COMPLIMENT THIS, TAX POLICIES THAT ENCOURAGE QUICK REHABILITATION AND /OR REDEVELOPMENT OF AGING PROPERTY NEEDS TO BE STRENGTHENED. SEVERAL SPECIFIC STRATEGIES AND PROGRAMS SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED, INCLUDING: _ -AN EQUITY GUARANTEE PROGRAM - A MAJOR DEVELOPING PROBLEM IN SOME AREAS IS A HESITANCY TO PURCHASE HOMES FOR FEAR OF DECLINING VALUES. A PROGRAM WHICH GUARANTEES EQUITY COULD ALLEVIATE SUCH FEARS. SUCH A PROGRAM SHOULD BE LIMITED TO OWNER- OCCUPIED DWELLINGS AND TO AREAS WHICH MEET PREDETERMINED CRITERIA. OTHER CONDITIONS, SUCH AS CODE COMPLIANCE AND MINIMUM TIME OF OWNERSHIP COULD APPLY. THE PROGRAM COULD OPERATE SIMILAR TO THE FHA MORTGAGE INSURANCE PROGRAM AND, THEREFORE REQUIRE MINIMAL, IF ANY, PUBLIC SUPPORT. -CODE ENFORCEMENT - FOR AREAS JUST BEGINNING TO EXPERIENCE DECLINE, ADDITIONAL CODE ENFORCEMENT CAN BE AN EFFECTIVE, RELATIVELY LOW -COST STRATEGY. ADDING THIS CAPABILITY TO MUNICIPAL BUDGETS CAN BE DIFFICULT HOWEVER, GIVEN RESTRICTIVE LEVY LIMITATIONS. THE STATE SHOULD CONSIDER ALLOCATING FUNDS TO ASSIST MUNICIPALITIES WITH CREATING OR EXPANDING HOUSING CODE ENFORCEMENT PROGRAMS. CRITERIA COULD BE DEVELOPED AS TO WHEN MUNICIPALITIES WOULD QUALIFY AND FOR HOW LONG THE STATE ASSISTANCE WOULD BE AVAILABLE. -EDA LEVY AUTHORITY - CITIES CURRENTLY HAVE LIMITED AUTHORITY TO LEVY FOR. EDA ACTIVITIES. CONSIDERATION SHOULD BE GIVEN TO .EXPANDING THIS AUTHORITY. - HOUSING COURT JURISDICTIONS - THE JURISDICTION OF CURRENT HOUSING COURTS IS LIMITED TO MULTI - FAMILY BUILDINGS. ABSENTEE OWNERSHIP OF SINGLE - FAMILY DWELLINGS IS BECOMING MORE OF A PROBLEM AS ONE MOVES OUTWARD FROM THE CORE OF THE CENTER CITIES. CONSIDERATION SHOULD BE GIVEN TO EXTENDING THE JURISDICTION OF HOUSING COURTS TO SINGLE - FAMILY BUILDINGS. - RESIDENTIAL MARKETING - AREAS OFTEN SUFFER FROM PERCEPTIONS, WHICH UPON CLOSER EXAMINATION ARE NOT ACCURATE. FURTHER, MANY AREAS WITH OLDER HOUSING OFTEN HAVE A NUMBER OF ATTRACTIVE FEATURES WHICH MAY NOT BE WIDELY KNOWN. WHILE CITIES ARE BECOMING INCREASINGLY ADEPT AT MARKETING THEMSELVES TO ATTRACT BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT, MOST DO NOT SIMILARLY MARKET THEMSELVES TO ATTRACT OR RETAIN NEW RESIDENTS TO THEIR EXISTING HOUSING STOCK. THE STATE SHOULD ASSIST CITIES WHICH MEET,CERTAIN CRITERIA IN DEVELOPING -14- 41 9 RESIDENTIAL MARKETING PROGRAMS. -15- 4 METROPOLITAN AGENCIES 90 -41 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL BUDGET AND WORK PROGRAM PROCESS (IV -F) The Metropolitan Council has an annual budget approaching 15 million dollars and its programs impact the two million plus people living in the metropolitan area. The budget document should convey sufficient information so that the residents can determine what. 'product' is being produced and how much the 'product' costs and the benefits. The budget process should commence early enough in the annual adoption cycle so that the residents can provide meaningful input as to goal and priorities. 41 -1 BUDGET DETAIL AND SPECIFICITY The annual budget and work program document has been improved in. recent years and contains more detail and specificity which enables public interest groups to make more reasoned _.recommendations but further improvements can be made. MANDATED OR NON DISCRETIONARY PROJECT, PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES SHOULD BE IDENTIFIED. PROJECTS, PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES WHICH MAY BE DISCRETIONARY BUT ARE TOTALLY OR MOSTLY FUNDED BY A.FEDERAL OR STATE GRANT SHOULD ALSO BE IDENTIFIED. MORE INFORMATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED AS TO PREVIOUS YEARS EXPENDITURES AND PROGRESS FOR ON -GOING PROGRAMS, PROJECTS AND ACTIVITIES. 41 -2 RELIANCE ON PROPERTY TAXES The AMM is concerned by the growing reliance on the property tax to support Council activities. Federal grants formerly funded about two /thirds of the Council Budget and the local property tax about one /third. The federal portion has now shrunk to about 20 percent. THE COUNCIL SHOULD_ MAKE A THOROUGH EXAMINATION OF THE PROGRAMS FORMERLY FUNDED BY FEDERAL GRANTS TO DETERMINE IF THEY ARE STILL NECESSARY AND WORTH4HILE WHEN ONLY LOCAL DOLLARS ARE INVOLVED. ADDITIONALLY THE COUNCIL SHOULD SEEK TO DIVEST ITSELF OF SERVICES THAT IT PERFORMS FOR THIS AREA, IF SUCH SERVICES ARE PERFORMED BY STATE AGENCIES FOR THE BALANCE OF THE STATE, OR SEEK STATE FUNDING FOR THOSE SERVICES. SOME AREAS WHICH NEED TO BE EXAMINED INCLUDE SOLID WASTE AND HEALTH CARE. 41 -3 PROGRAM-EVALUATION The Council usually levies the maximum or close to the maximum tax levy allowed. It is difficult for 'outsiders' to determine if internal evaluation is being performed to ascertain the effectiveness or necessity of council programs or if they are being continued because 'they have always been done' and there are sufficient funds available to do so. THE AMM BELIEVES THAT EVERY MAJOR COUNCIL PROGRAM /PRIORITY SHOULD -16- MEET THREE TESTS: -THE ISSUE OR PROBLEM BEING ADDRESSED IS IMPORTANT TO THE WELL BEING OF THE REGION. - COUNCIL INTERVENTION OR ACTIVITY WILL MAKE A DIFFERENCE. - COUNCIL EFFORT OR ACTIVITY DOES NOT DUPLICATE OR SERVE AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR A STATE LEVEL PROGRAM OR EFFORT OR WHAT SHOULD BE A STATE LEVEL ACTIVITY. 90 -42 WATER MANAGEMENT IN METROPOLITAN AREA (IV -H) In order to safeguard the public health and the environment it is necessary to plan and manage our water resources as a valuable state and metropolitan resource. Most Water Management Organizations (WMO's), cities, and towns are doing a good.job of dealing with surface and groundwater management issues and have the authority and ability to continue to do so in a cost effective manner. These existing mechanisms should continue to be used to the greatest extent possible to address surface and groundwater management problems, instead of establishing a new system or creating new organizations. Local units of government should retain the basic responsibility for surface water management, as they are the level of government closest to the problem. A major study is now underway under the direction of BOWSR to determine the effectiveness and appropriateness of the existing metropolitan area water planning and management structure. The AMM is represented on the study committee. THE AMM WILL WAIT FOR THE RESULTS OF THE REPORT FROM THE BEFORE MENTIONED STUDY BEFORE MAKING SUBSTANTIAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHANGE IN THE STRUCTURE OR AUTHORITIES FOR WATER PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT. THE AMM DOES SUPPORT THREE SPECIFIC ACTIONS WHICH ARE' NOT DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE STUDY: -THE SPECIAL LEVY STATUS SHOULD BE REINSTATED FOR THE COSTS OF IMPLEMENTING THE SURFACE AND GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ACTS. ' -THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD (EQB) OR MINNESOTA BOARD OF WATER AND SOIL RESOURCES (BOWSR) SHOULD EXAMINE THE 1987 METROPOLITAN GROUNDWATER PLANNING ACT AND ASSESS IF COUNTIES ARE THE LOGICAL ENTITY AROUND WHICH TO STRUCTURE GROUNDWATER MANGEMENT IN THE. METROPOLITAN AREA. -THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD PROVIDE FUNDS FOR ANY ADDITIONAL WATER PLANNING ACTIVITIES IT MANDATES ON CITIES. 90 -43 WASTE STREAM MANAGEMENT (IV -I) The problem of managing the waste stream (for all types of waste) is and will continue to be one of the major social environmental problems as we head into the next decade. We are -17- 1, rapidly running out of space (capacity for land disposal) in the metropolitan area and there are no general disposal facilities in this state for Hazardous Waste. We are also learning that for many materials incineration may not be a good environmental alternative to landfill disposal. The existing waste management system centralizes responsibility at the state level for hazardous. waste but requires the cooperation and support of all levels of government and the private sector. The solid waste system for the metropolitan area is essentially a three tiered. system: cities control and regulate collection; counties are responsible for 'siting' new landfills, developing abatement plans, developing processing facilities and regulating existing landfills; and the Metropolitan Council provides grants and has regional planning and coordinating responsibilities. The systems were intended to foster and encourage abatement, recycling and resource recovery for as much of - the waste 'stream as possible and then to assure environmentally sound disposal for the remaining waste. In spite of,a great deal of cooperation and coordination among and between the various levels and units of government and the private sector, some major problems appear on the horizon. While much has been accomplished during the past decade in improving the waste stream management system. .Much remains to be done and any future legislation should take into account the following precepts. 43 -1 INTEGRATED WASTE STREAM PLANNING The disposal of solid waste is a multifaceted problem which will require the cooperation and participation of all levels of government and the private sector to effectively develop a solid waste system which is cost effective and environmentally sound. To achieve such a system, all elements of the waste management hierarchy (reduction, reuse, recycling, composting, incinceration, landfilling) must be utilized. Further, it must be realized that an effective. "system" begins before materials become "waste" and, as such, a comprehensive view of the entire life cycle of products is needed in order to succeed. -THE AMM ENDORSES THE CONCEPT THAT SINCE GOVERNMENT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL, IT HAS A LEGITIMATE INTEREST IN BEING INVOLVED IN OVERALL WASTE STREAM MANAGEMENT. THIS MEANS THAT GOVERNMENT'S INTEREST BEGINS BEFORE MATERIALS BECOME "WASTE." -THE AMM ENDORSES A WASTE MANAGEMENT HIERARCHY WHICH INCLUDES REDUCTION, REUSE, RECYCLING, COMPOSTING, INCINERATION AND LANDFILLING. FURTHER, A COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEM MUST INCLUDE A MIXTURE OF ALL THESE ELEMENTS AND SHOULD NOT RELY SOLELY ON ANY ONE ELEMENT. -THE AMM ENCOURAGES MORE ATTENTION BE GIVEN TO THE ALTERNATIVES OF REDUCTION, REUSE AND RECYCLING BY ALL LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT. +THE STATE SHOULD FUND THE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF AN EDUCATION PROGRAM, WHICH ACTIVELY ENCOURAGES CITIZENS TO RECYCLE, COMPOST, REUSE AND REDUCE WASTE GENERATION. +LEGISLATION SHOULD BE INITIATED TO REQUIRE MANUFACTURERS OF PACKAGING AND PRINT MATERIALS TO ESTABLISH RECYCLING AND REUSE MARKETS. +ESTABLISH STATE REGULATIONS WHICH REQUIRE BEVERAGE AND FOOD RETAILERS TO HAVE -A DEPOSIT AND RETURN PROCESS IN PLACE FOR REUSABLE AND RETURNABLE CONTAINERS. - LEGISLATION SHOULD BE INITIATED TO REQUIRE DEPOSITS ON ITEMS WHICH DO NOT HAVE A VIABLE RECYCLING MARKET. -THE AMM OPPOSES ANY LEGISLATION WHICH WOULD LIMIT LOCAL INITIATIVES IN WASTE STREAM MANAGEMENT. -AMM SUPPORTS COMPOSTING AS A TECHNIQUE FOR REUSE OF YARDWASTES AND OTHER APPROPRIATE COMPONENTS OF THE SOLID WASTE STREAM. GIVEN THE JANUARY 1, 1990 PROHIBITION ON LANDF-ILLING YARDWASTE, RESIDENTS AND REFUSE HAULERS NEED TO BE IMMEDIATELY PROVIDED WITH CONVENIENT LOCATIONS TO DEPOSIT BRUSH AND OTHER YARDWASTES FOR PROCESSING. COUNTIES WITH THE ASSISTANCE FROM THE STATE.SHOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND OPERATING COMPOSITING FACILITIES. 43 -2 HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT The improper disposal of hazardous wastes, through landfiliing or incineration, poses a major risk of water and air pollution. Much has been done to monitor the generation and proper disposal of hazardous waste by business and industry, and these efforts should continue. However, the reduction, control and proper disposal of household hazardous wastes is a significant concern which needs to be addressed. (A.) HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE. THE AMM SUPPORTS A STATE -WIDE PROGRAM TARGETED TO THE REDUCTION AND PROPER MANAGEMENT OF HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTES, INCLUDING: - PERMANENT DROP OFF OR DISPOSAL SITES - STRATEGICALLY AND CONVENIENTLY LOCATED THROUGHOUT THE STATE WHERE ALL TYPES OF HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTES CAN BE TAKEN FOR PROPER HANDLING, PROCESSING, OR DISPOSAL. - EDUCATIONAL AND POINT -OF -SALE INFORMATION FOR CONSUMERS NOTIFYING THEM OF THE HAZARDOUS NATURE OF CERTAIN PRODUCTS AND THE IMPORTANCE OF PROPER HANDLING. -19- - INVOLVEMENT OF THE GENERATORS (RETAILERS) IN THE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTES TO HELP ASSURE PROPER HANDLING AND PROCESSING. - INFORMATION TO CONSUMERS ALERTING THEM TO NON- HAZARDOUS SUBSTITUTES FOR HAZARDOUS HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTS. -------.-ENCOURAGEMENT WHICH COULD INCLUDE INCENTIVES TO MANUFACTURES TO PRODUCE LESS HAZARDOUS PRODUCTS FOR USE IN HOUSEHOLDS. THE TOP PRIORITY OF THE HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IS TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT PRODUCED. (B.) COMMERCIAL /INDUSTRIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE. THE AMM SUPPORTS CONTINUED EFFORTS AT THE STATE LEVEL TO PROPERLY MANAGE INDUSTRIAL HAZARDOUS WASTES, INCLUDING THE RE -USE, RECOVERY AND RECYCLING OF AS MUCH HAZARDOUS WASTE AS POSSIBLE. THAT WHICH CANNOT BE RE -USED OR REPROCESSED MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER. MANUFACTURERS SHOULD ALSO BE ENCOURAGED TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS USED IN THEIR MANUFACTURING'PROCESSES. 43 -3 METROPOLITAN /COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES. As noted previously, the cities have the responsibility for waste collection including implementing and managing most recycling type programs. The other waste stream management responsibilities are basically split between the Metropolitan Council and the Counties. Considerable progress has been made in recent years in certain parts of the waste stream management system particularly those aspects for which cities are responsible. But several significant problems beyond the control of cities are becoming evident including: the inability of the counties to site needed waste facilities (landfills, transfer stations, compost sites, etc.), fluctuating and /or lack of markets for some recyclables, uneven funding among counties to run the low tech systems, and the radical variance in disposal costs throughout the metropolitan area. Some of these problems are urgent and significant changes may need to be made in the waste stream management system in the metropolitan area. Some of the current waste stream management concerns are similar to the concerns which precipitated the formation of other regional commissions. SERIOUS CONSIDERATION SHOULD BE GIVEN TO THE FORMATION OF A REGIONAL SOLID WASTE COMMISSION. IT COULD BE PATTERNED ALONG THE LINES OF THE RTB STRUCTURALLY INCLUDING HAVING LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIALS SERVING AS COMMISSIONERS. MORE ANALYSIS AND STUDY IS NEEDED TO DETERMINE THE TOTAL LIST OF FUNCTIONS TO BE ASSIGNED TO SUCH COMMISSION BUT MOST FUNCTIONS NOW PERFORMED BY THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AND THE COUNTIES SHOULD BE GIVEN STRONG CONSIDERATION INCLUDING THE FOLLOWING: -20- - RESPONSIBILITY FOR SITING CERTAIN TYPES OF WASTE PROCESSING AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES. - REGULATION OF DISPOSAL CHARGES (TIPPING /FEE) TO PROVIDE MORE FAIRNESS AND EQUITY. - DISTRIBUTION OF FUNDS TO SUPPORT THE LOCAL RECYCLING-PROGRAMS. - DISTRIBUTION OF OTHER GRANT FUNDS NOW MANAGED BY THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL -MOST OTHER FUNCTION PERFORMED BY THE COUNCIL EXCEPT FOR THE PLANNING FUNCTIONS (LONG RANGE POLICY PLANS, ETC.). - COORDINATION OF MARKETING EFFORTS FOR RECYCLABLES. 43 -4 LOCAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES The AMM acknowledges that cities have certain responsibilities in helping to manage and implement an effective solid waste management system including recycling programs and the collection systems. THE AMM BELIEVES THAT THE SYSTEM OUGHT TO BE FLEXIBILE AND BASED ON PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND /OR GOALS RATHER THAN MANDATED TECHNIQUES. TO HELP ACHIEVE RECYCLING AND ABATEMENT GOALS, THE AMM WOULD SUPPORT THE CREATION OF A DISPOSAL SYSTEM WHERE INCENTIVES ARE PROVIDED TO RESIDENTS WHO REDUCE THEIR VOLUME OF WASTE THROUGH ABATEMENT, RE -USE AND SOURCE SEPARATION ACTIVITIES. THE RESPONSIBILITIES NOW ASSIGNED TO CITIES FOR SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SHOULD REMAIN WITH THE CITIES. 43 -5 FUNDING The current funding system for solid waste has a number of drawbacks: It does not encourage maximum utilization of the waste disposal hierarchy; it often gives no incentive to individual residents to participate in recycling; it does not differentiate between generators of 'clean' waste and 'problem' waste; and it has given no assurances that the main sources of funding are related to the entities incurring expenses. -AMM BELIEVES THAT IN GENERAL FUNDING THE SOLID WASTE SYSTEM SHOULD COME FROM THE GENERATORS OF SOLID WASTE THROUGH THE COST OF DISPOSAL. IN PRACTICAL TERMS, THIS MEANS THAT THE TIP FEE SHOULD BE THE GENERAL, ALL - PURPOSE VEHICLE FOR FUNDING. -AMM BELIEVES THAT THE SALES TAX AS A FUNDING .MECHANISM IS NOT DESIRABLE, SINCE IT APPLIES NOT ONLY TO DISPOSAL, BUT ALSO TO THE SERVICE OF COLLECTION. -IN GENERAL, THE FUNDING SYSTEM SHOULD ENCOURAGE MAXIMUM USE OF THE WASTE HIERARCHY. IT SHOULD COST MORE TO DISPOSE OF WASTE IN LANDFILLS THAN IN RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITIES. -AMM SUPPORTS THE CONCEPT THAT MATERIALS WHICH CAUSE SPECIAL -21- d• PROBLEMS IN THE WASTE STREAM SHOULD BEAR THE COSTS (THROUGH THE COST OF PURCHASING THE MATERIALS). ASSOCIATED WITH THESE PROBLEMS. -AMM ENCOURAGES PROVIDING FINANCIAL INCENTIVES.SUCH AS VARIABLE AND DIFFERENTIAL FEES TO RESIDENTS WHO PARTICIPATE IN RECYCLING. -AMM BELIEVES THAT ANY FUNDING SYSTEM MUST GUARANTEE DISTRIBUTION OF THE MONIES TO ALL ENTITIES INVOLVED IN THE SYSTEM. 43 -6 ORGANIZED COLLECTION Organized collection serves as a viable and important method for municipalities to ' achieve solid waste abatement. It is a type of service agreement that allows cities proper regulatory power over their solid waste collection system. It provides municipalities the opportunity to choose the type of solid waste collection that would best serve their residents. 'Just Compen- sation' legislation is designed to limit municipalities regulatory power in the area of solid waste collection. In placing severe financial penalties on municipalities that undertake organized collection, 'Just Compensation' legislation infringes on municipalities rights to establish intangible service agreements for municipal services. -THE AMM ENDORSES THE CONCEPT OF ORGANIZED COLLECTION AS A VIABLE METHOD FOR MUNICIPALITIES TO ASSERT REGULATORY POWER OVER THEIR SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SYSTEMS. -THE AMM BELIEVES THAT ORGANIZE D AVAILABLE TO CITIES AS THEY COLLECTION SYSTEM THAT WOULD RESIDENTS. COLLECTION MUST CONTINUE TO BE CHOOSE A TYPE OF SOLID WASTE BEST SERVE THE NEEDS OF THEIR -THE AMM OPPOSES ANY LEGISLATION THAT WOULD IMPOSE COMPENSATION PENALTIES ON MUNICIPALITIES WHO CHOOSE TO IMPLEMENT A SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SYSTEM. 43 -7 HOST CITIES AND CLEANUP RESPONSIBILITIES While solid waste facilities are components of county and regional solid waste management systems, they must be located in individual cities. Because the number of facilities is limited, the effects of hosting these facilities is not equally shared among cities. Most of these effects are negative - an increased likelihood and incidence of water, soil, air, and noise pollution; and increased amount of litter and offensive odors; a greater likelihood of adverse impacts on values of neighboring properties; a need for increased maintenance on public streets and highways; and potential threats to public health and welfare in areas immediate to and along access routes to these facilities. Longer -term -22- impacts may affect cities if the organizations responsible for facility operations cease as financially viable entities. Safeguards need to be enacted for host cities for the operations and clean up responsibilities associated with solid waste facilities. The trend within the metropolitan area.has been to internalize present and future costs of solid waste management on current generators of solid waste. These costs should include the extra and adverse financial impacts borne by host communities. Cities host these regional facilities because of accidents of geography. Liabilities for these facilities should be shared across the -region. -THE AMM SUPPORTS THE CURRENT COMPENSATION LEVEL ALLOWED THROUGH SURCHARGE FEES AS A MINIMUM LEVEL; THIS COMPENSATION SHOULD BE CONTINUED OR INCREASED. THIS FORM OF COMPENSATION SHOULD BE AVAILABLE TO ALL TYPES OF SOLID WASTE FACILITIES. -THE AMM BELIEVES THE HOST COMMUNITIES SHOULD NOT BEAR A FINANCIAL LIABILITY ASSOCIATED WITH SOLID WASTE FACILITIES. .COSTS INCURRED FOR MONITORING OPERATIONS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS SHOULD BE BORNE BY FACILITY OPERATORS OR, IN THE ABSENCE OF SUCH REGULATIONS, BE ASSUMED BY THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. LEGISLATION NEEDS TO BE STRENGTHENED SO AS TO EXEMPT CITIES FROM ANY PRESENT AND FUTURE LIABILITY ARISING FROM OPERATIONS OF SOLID WASTE FACILITIES. LEGISLATION SHOULD FURTHER ESTABLISH THAT PROCEEDS FOR FUTURE REMEDIAL ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIONS BE IN A TRUST FUND. -THE AMM WILL SUPPORT LEGISLATION WHICH CLEARLY ARTICULATES THAT REMEDIAL ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITIES ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY ONLY ON THE PERMITTED OPERATOR AND /OR THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. -THE AMM _BELIEVES THAT LOCAL PROPERTY TAXING AUTHORITIES SHOULD NOT BE FORCED TO LEVY HIGHER PROPERTY TAX RATES BECAUSE SOLID WASTE FACILITIES MAY DEPRESS PROPERTY VALUES WITHIN PARTS OF THE TAXING JURISDICTION. OPERATORS SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO PAY ADDITIONAL FEES COMMENSURATE WITH THE ADVERSE TAX REVENUE IMPACT RESULTING FROM LOWER VALUES ON NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. -THE AMM WILL SUPPORT MEASURES WHICH REQUIRE THAT OPERATORS OF SOLID WASTE FACILITIES GUARANTEE THE PURCHASE VALUE OF PROPERTIES WHICH ARE INFLUENCED BY THEIR PROXIMITY TO THOSE FACILITIES. -23- A II 5 TRANSPORTATION 90 -51 REGIONAL TRANSIT SYSTEM (V -R) The purpose of a.Transpor tat ion.. System -is to provide, mobility for people and accessibility to and_ for .economic development and services. The most effective system will make maximum use-of all - -- transit alternatives and strategies where they are most appropriate, thus, creating a truly integrated system. Exclusive reliance Qn . only freeways is imprudent and possibly cost prohibitive primarily due to social and economic upheaval of established neighborhoods for right of way acquisition. Transit improvements are imperative, but even with implementation of various load increasing strategies, the capacity is finite and will reach unacceptable saturation limits within the forseeable future. The AMM supports more coordination and integration of Transit and Highway planning and implementation. THE REGIONAL TRANSIT SYSTEM SHOULD BE A COMBINATION OF SHORT AND LONG HAUL SYSTEMS AND BE INCLUDED IN ALL PLANNING DOCUMENTS AT ALL LEVELS INCLUDING EIS STUDIES. THE LONG HAUL SYSTEM SHOULD INCLUDE HOV LANES, EXPRESS BUSES, AND THE LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT SYSTEM WHICH SHOULD BE BUILT WHEN IT IS APPROPRIATE AND FINANCIALLY FEASIBLE IN EACH CORRIDOR OF THE AREA TO CONNECT RESIDENTS TO JOB, RETAIL, AND COMMERCIAL CENTERS'. THE SHORT HAUL SYSTEM COULD INCLUDE A VARIETY OF MODES, INCLUDING A TAXI SYSTEM, BUSES, AND PARK AND RIDES ADEQUATE TO CONNECT THE LONG'HAUL SYSTEM AND REGIONAL CENTERS, MAJOR TRIP GENERATORS AND COMMUNITIES, BOTH URBAN AND SUBURBAN. BUS SYSTEMS AND ESPECIALLY LRT SYSTEMS SHOULD INCLUDE AMPLE REGIONAL PARK AND RIDE FACILITIES, WITH EASY ACCESS, CONSISTENT WITH THE PLANNING OF A REGIONAL ENTITY TO ACCOMMODATE THE NEEDS OF THE PUBLIC. FEEDER- SYSTEMS SHOULD BE A MAJOR CONSIDERATION FOR BUS PARK AND RIDE AND LRT STATIONS. PLANS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED TO USE VAN POOLS TO ALSO FEED THE PARK AND RIDES FOR EXPRESS BUSES AND LRT. ALL TRANSIT MODES AND TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT POLICIES SHOULD BE GIVEN EQUAL CONSIDERATION NOW AND•IN THE FUTURE IN ORDER TO PROVIDE THE BEST TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM POSSIBLE TO THE METROPOLITAN AREA. THE FINANCING FOR THE REGIONAL SYSTEM SHOULD BE BORNE IN PROPORTION TO THE BENEFIT OR SERVICES RECEIVED. 90 -52 CSAH DESIGNATION County State Aid Highways located within cities may not be abandoned, changed, or revoked without the concurrence of the governing body of the city unless the city refuses or neglects to -24- approve plans for construction which are in conformance with CSAH standards for a period of one year. Counties would like the authority to change designation without,preparing expensive plans and without city concurrence based on changing conditions. Cities are concerned about abandonment of major county roadways without appropriate maintenance. Therefore; THE AMM OPPOSES ELIMINATION OF CITY COUNCIL CONCURRENCE FOR COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY ABANDONMENT, CHANGE, OR REVOCATION 'UNTIL SUCH TIME AS STANDARDS CAN BE DEVELOPED. i -25- rp :* A. w91��eA e `' Cn • , ~WAPORPtbV � JOBS REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: JOHN WALLIN, FINANCE DIRECTOR Date: OCTOBER 13, 1989 Subject :CANCELLING LEVY FOR BONDS Agenda Item # -xi—.A & B. Consent E] Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 51 To Council Action ❑ Motion Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adoption of Resolutions cancelling levy for 1990 on $5,400,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1984 and $2,200,000 General Obligation Redevelopment Bonds. Info /Background: The principal and interest on the Improvement Bonds of 1984 and the Redevelopment Bonds are payable primarily from special assessments. In the event that the special assessments fell short, additional ad valorem taxes were required by law to be levied on all taxable property in the City for each of the years that principal and interest payments are to be made. Since the special assessments will again be sufficient to pay principal and interest, the tax levied for 1990 should be cancelled. RESOLUTION CANCELLING AD VALOREM TAXES COLLECTIBLE WITH,1990 GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES LEVIED FOR $5,400,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1984 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has, by resolution adopted September 10, 1984, levied a special ad valorem tax for the payment of principal and interest of its General'Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1984; said ad valorem tax in the amount of $422,000 being collectible with and as a part of other general taxes for the year 1990; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, permits the cancellation of said levies providing moneys are on hand for payment of principal and interest for said bond issue; and it has been determined by this Council that the required moneys are on hand for the payment of said principal and interest; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that those ad valorem tax levies made by resolution of this Council adopted September 10,• 1984, and collectible with and as a part of other general property taxes in said City for the year 1990,.be and hereby are cancelled; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota, be authorized and directed to cancel the above described ad valorem tax levies and to delete said levies from taxes to be spread for the year 1990. ADOPTED this 16th day of October, 1989. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 16, 1989, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 17th day of October, 1989. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk - RESOLUTION CANCELLING AD VALOREM TAXES COLLECTIBLE WITH 1990 GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES LEVIED FOR $2,200,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION REDEVELOPMENT BONDS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has, by, resolution adopted November 3, 1975, levied a special ad valorem tax for the payment of principal and interest of its $2,200,000 General Obligation Redevelopment Bonds, said ad valorem tax in the amount of $270,800 being collectible with and as a part of other general taxes for the year 1990; and , WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, permits the cancellation of said levies providing moneys are on hand for payment of principal and interest for said bond issue; and it has been determined by this Council that the required moneys are on hand for the payment of said principal and interest; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that those ad valorem tax levies made by resolution of this Council adopted November 3, 1975, and collectible with and as a part of other general property taxes in said City for the year 1990, be and hereby are cancelled; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota, be authorized and directed to cancel the above described ad valorem tax levies and to delete said levies from taxes to be spread for the year 1990. ADOPTED this 16th day of October, 1989. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 16, 1989, and as recorded in the - Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 17th day of October, 1989. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk RESOLUTION CANCELLING AD VALOREM TAXES COLLECTIBLE WITH 1990 GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES LEVIED FOR $5,400,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1984 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has, by resolution adopted September 10, 1984, levied a special ad valorem tax for the payment of principal and interest of its General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1984; said ad valorem tax in the amount of $422,000 being collectible with and as a part of other general taxes for the year 1990; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, permits the cancellation of said levies providing moneys are on hand for payment of principal and interest for said bond issue; and it has been determined by this Council that the required moneys are on hand for the payment of said principal and interest; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that those ad valorem tax levies made by resolution of this Council adopted September 10, 1984, and collectible with 'and as a part of other general property taxes in said City for the year 1990, be and hereby are cancelled; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota, be authorized and directed to cancel the above described ad valorem tax levies and to delete said levies from taxes to be spread for the year 1990. ADOPTED this 16th day of October, 1989. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 16, 1989, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand.and seal of said City this 17th day of October, 1989. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk RESOLUTION CANCELLING AD VALOREM TAXES COLLECTIBLE WITH 1990 GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES LEVIED FOR $2,200,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION REDEVELOPMENT BONDS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has, by resolution adopted November 3, 1975, levied a special ad valorem tax for the payment of principal and interest of its $2,200,000 General Obligation Redevelopment Bonds, said ad valorem tax in the amount of $270,800 being collectible with and as a part of other general taxes for the year 1990; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, permits the cancellation of said levies providing moneys are on hand for payment of principal and interest for said bond issue; and it has been determined by this Council that the required moneys are on hand for the payment of said principal and interest; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that those ad valorem tax levies made by resolution of this Council adopted November 3, 1975, and collectible with and as a part of other general property taxes in said City for the year 1990, be and hereby are cancelled; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota, be authorized and directed to cancel the above described ad valorem tax levies and to delete said levies from taxes to be spread for the year 1990. ADOPTED this 16th day of October, 1989. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of 0ctober.16, 1989, and as recorded in, the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 17th day of October, 1989. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk Ic 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -16 -89 PAGE 1 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 289700 10/03/89 77.59 KUSTOM ELECTRONICS EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274 - 420 -42 554240 77.59 *I 289701 10/03/89 54.46 MPH INDUSTRIES INC EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274 - 420 -42 MC8107 54.46 289702 10/03/89 45.00 - 48--99 AFFILIATED EMERGENCY PRO SERVICES 10- 4201 - 470 -47 45.00* 48.99 289703 10/03/89 80.17 HOLIDAY INN ST CLOUD CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 80.17 * * * * ** * * * -CKS GOPHER STATE SEALCOAT 289705 10/03/89 9,600.00 RESURFACING 10- 4201 - 647 -64 1766 3146 289705 10/03/89 67.21 TRI STAR INSULATION REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 704 -70 32656 3621 289706 10/03/89 400.00 CUMMINS DIESEL SERV SERV CONTRACT 30- 4288 - 782 -78 150635 3855 400.00 289707 10/03/89 2,224.10 IND RUBBER /SUPPLY FLOORING 28- 1300 - 001 -00 22666 3141 289707 10/03/89 492.12 IND RUBBER /SUPPLY REPAIR PLASTIC 28- 4248 - 704 -70 22665 3696 2,716.22 289708 10/03/89 50.00 ALCO CAPITAL RESOURC GENERAL SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 702 -70 71790 50.00 289709 10/03/89 492.72 BUDGET LIGHTING INC. REPAIR LIGHTS 28- 4248 - 702 -70 4024 492.72 289710 10/03/89 605.00 JOSEPH L BARD LTD FEE FOR SERVICE 10- 4201 - 140 -14 605.00 289711 10/03/89 45.00 MICHAEL GUNDERSON REFUND 28- 3500- 000 -00 45.00 289712 10/03/89 90.00 CAROL COLE REFUND 28-3500- 000 -00 90.00 289713 10/03/89 45.00 KRIS STRAWBRIDGE REFUND 28- 3500 - 000 -00 45.00 * 289714 10/03/89 45.00 MARTHA SCUDDER REFUND 28- 3500 - 000 -00 45.00 * 289715 10/03/89 213.00 NANCY KNUDSON PRO SERV 28- 4224 - 701 -70 213.00 * 289716 10/03/89 18.00 SOUTHTOWN PLBG REFUND 10- 3110 - 000 -00 18.00 * 289717 10/03/89 104.00 BREDAHL PLBG REFUND 10- 3113 - 000 -00 104.00 * 289718 10/03/89 12.00 JULIE KNAPP REFUND 10- 1145 - 000 -00 12.00* r � 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 289718 10/03/89 * * * * ** 17.00 289720 10/03/89 289720 10/03/89 289720 10/03/89 289720 10/03/89 289720 10/03/89 289720 10/03/89 289721 10/03/89 289722 10/03/89 289723 10/03/89 289724 10/03/89 289725 10/03/89 289726 10/03/89 289727 10/03/89 289728 10/03/89 289729 10/03/89 289730 10/03/89 * * * * ** 289732 10/05/89 289733 10/05/89 289734 10/05/89 289734 10/05/89 289735 10/05/89 c 10- 4201 - 500 -50 916.10 * CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 25.00 gWbiE KNAPP UNITED WAY MEETING 25.00 * - 2; -88-- UNITED WAY MPLS . 10 -16 -89 PAGE 2 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4206 - 140 -14 3.00 DIANE SANKEY PW GAS 10- 4208 - 621 -62 17.00 DIANE SANKEY PW LICENSE TABS 10- 4310 - 560 -56 5.50 DIANE SANKEY PW TITLE FOR CAR 10- 4310 - 560 -56 6.31 DIANE SANKEY PW POSTAGE 10- 4504 - 301 -30 6.75 DIANE SANKEY PW PARKING 10- 4802 - 280 -28 13.50 DIANE SANKEY PW PARKING 10- 4802 - 280 -28 52.06 * 916.10 MONA MEYER /MCGRATH SERVICES 10- 4201 - 500 -50 916.10 * 89.70 CHEAP JOES ART STUF COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 3533 89.70 * 303.00 ILLBRUCK INC SONEX 10- 4540 - 520 -52 124475 3571 303.00 * 61.37 ABM EQUIP /SUPPLY COVER 10- 4540 - 560 -56 394200 3363 61.37 * 190.37 DALE LUNDGREN MILEAGE 30- 4208 - 781 -78 190.37 * 70.51 BOB BRAMWELL MILEAGE 30- 4208 - 781 -78 70.51 * 2,348.50 HOPKINS PET HOSPITAL ANIMAL SERVICES 10- 4278 - 470 -47 3861 2,348.50 * 38.56 CERAMIC ARTS /SUPPLY CRAFT SUPPLIES 23- 4588 - 611 -61 13316 3629 38.56 * 850.00 RICHARD G LARSON SERVICES 30- 4201 - 781 -78 850.00 * 74.88 NEWSWEEK SUBSCRIPTION 10- 4204 - 140 -14 74.88 * 6,640.00 FINLEY BROS ENTER SERVICES 10- 4201 - 647 -64 3594 3475 6,640.00 * 210.00 HARMON CONTRACT PRO SERVICES 30- 4201 - 782 -78 2981 210.00 * 14.99 TODD CORP UNIFORMS 30- 4262 - 782 -78 334712 3696 312.40 TODD CORP UNIFORMS 30- 4262 - 782 -78 33165 3696 327.39 * 875.00 MICHELLE BERGMAN SERVICES 30- 4201 - 781 -78 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV 875.00 * 289736 10/05/89 350.00 C WAYNE COUTRNEY PRO SERVICE 30- 4201 - 782 -78 350.00 * 289737 10/05/89 179.92 DAVID BLOOD UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 420 -42 .179.92 289738 10/05/89 261.26 NORTHERN PUMP 10- 4620 - 560 -56 261.26 * 289739 10/09/89 2.88 SUSAN OAKES REFUND 40- 3800 - 000 -00 2.88* s.?G * 289746 289740 18�85�89 10/09/89 i9.60 10.08 AN6A ALLE ANGA GALLE REFUND REFUND 48 9899 999 GO 40- 3800 - 000 -00 10.08* 29-16- * 289741 10/05/89 110.00 JAMES TOENSING SERVICES 10- 4201 - 627 -62 110.00 * 289742 10/05/89 50.00 BOB CONNOLLY SERVICES 10- 4201 - 627 -62 50.00 * 289743 10/05/89 45.00 J KANJANAVIVITCH SERVICES 10- 4201 - 627 -62 45.00 * 289744 10/05/89 45.00 NAOMI JOHNSON SERVICES 10- 4201 - 627 -62 45.00 * 289745 10/05/89 45.00 MONICA SULLIVAN SERVICES 10- 4201 - 627 -62 45.00 * 289746 10/05/89 45.00 DIANA HEDGES SERVICES 10- 4201- 627 -62 45.00 * 289747 10/05/89 40.00 MATT DAHLIEN SERVICES 10- 4201 - 627 -62 40.00 * 10 -16 -89 PAGE 3 # P.O. # MESSAGE 3584 289748 10/05/89 125.00 GRAFIX SHOPPE EQUIP 10- 4248 - 440 -44 2322 3843 289748 10/05/89 855.00 GRAFIX SHOPPE REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 2303 3235 289748 10/05/89 855.00 GRAFIX SHOPPE EQUIP 10- 4901 - 440 -44 2303 3235 1,835.00 * 289749 10/05/89 559.00 MIDWEST AQUA CARE SERVICES 10- 4201 - 358 -30 3887 559.00 * 289750 10/10/89 19.98 TARGET STORES GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 440 -44 068172 3238 289750 10/05/89 135.69 TARGET STORES BATTERIES /CHARGER 10- 4504 - 440 -44 3233 155.67 * 289751 10/05/89 52.50 VFW POST #5555 ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 822 -82 289751 10/05/89 52.50 VFW POST #5555 ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 842 -84 289751 10/05/89 52.50 VFW POST #5555 ADVERTISING 50- 4214- 862 -86 1989 CITY OF EDINA 10- 4208: 480 -48 CHECK REGISTER 25- 4924 - 520 -52 17414 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 10- 4202 - 600 -60 157.50 * 10- 4580 - 560 -56 289752 10/05/89 224.92 DAVID VELDE SCHOOLI 30- 3501 - 000 -00 224.92 * 30- 3501 - 000 -00 289753 10/05/89 108.24 FRANCIS CALLAHAN MILEAGE 10- 4201 - 500 -50 108.24 * 40- 3800 - 000 -00 289754 10/05/89 153.40 SURPLUS OFFICE SUPP CONF TABLE 153.40 * 289755 10/05/89 79.00 SUCCESS BUILDERS REGISTRATION 289755 10/05/89 79.00 SUCCESS BUILDERS REGISTRATION 289755 10/05/89 79.00 SUCCESS BUILDERS REGISTRATION 237.00 * 289756 10/05/89 21.08 STEVE JOHNSON MEETINGS 21.08 * 289757 10/05/89 50.00 RANDY SCHUGAL TOOLS 50.00 * 289758 10/05/89 50.00 DPI OFFICE SUPPLIES 50.00 * 289759 10/05/89 4.00 DORIS BEVERS REFUND 4.00 * 289760 10/05/89 267.00 DORIS WOLTER COMMISSION 267.00 * 289761 10/05/89 100.00 PAT GREER FEE 100.00 * 289762 10/05/89 15.60 EDINA ART CENTER PAYMENT 15.60 * 289763 10/09/89 80.00 LUCY M ROSCHE CLEANING 289763 10/05/89 80.00 LUCY M ROSCHE CLEANING 160.00 * 289764 10/05/89 3,415.00 DIANE SIMS PAGE SERVICES 3,415.00 * 289765 10/05/89 195.00 SCOTT FAHY PROD REPAIRS 195.00 * 289766 10/05/89 26.80 BILL BOTENKAMP REFUND 26.80 * 289767 10/05/89 3.92 LOUIS WAGNER REFUND 3.92 * 289768 10/05/89 18.80 ERIC SCHNED REFUND 18.80 * t 10 -16 -89 PAGE 4 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4202 - 480 -48 10- 4208: 480 -48 25- 4924 - 520 -52 17414 2423 10- 4202 - 120 -12 10- 4202 - 140 -14 10- 4202 - 600 -60 10- 4202 - 280 -28 10- 4580 - 560 -56 30- 4516 - 781 -78 1330 3895 30- 3505 - 000 -00 30- 3501 - 000 -00 30- 3501 - 000 -00 30- 3501 - 000 -00 27- 4201 - 662 -66 27- 4201 - 662 -66 30554 3063 10- 4201 - 500 -50 28- 4248 - 702 -70 3883 40- 3800 - 000 -00 40- 3800 - 000 -00 40- 3800 - 000 -00 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -16 -89 PAGE 5 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 289769 10/05/89 39.00 LEAANNS SEW /DECO REPAIR FIRE GEAR 10- 4248 - 440 -44 89027 3841 289769 10/10/89 21.00 LEAANNS SEW /DECO REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 440 -44 89029 60.00 * 289770 10/05/89 75.00 IIMC FEE 10- 4204 - 140 -14 75.00 * 289771 10/05/89 60.25 MN AUTO DAMAGE APPR BODY ESTIMATES 10- 4248 - 560 -56 46125 3805 60.25 * 289772 10/05/89 885.00 NATIONAL INSTITUTE SCHOOL 10- 4202 - 640 -64 3829 885.00 * 289773 10/05/89 980.50 SHERWOOD TREE SERV TREE REMOVAL 10- 1300 - 090 -23 980.50* 289774 10/05/89 10.00 STATE OF MN FUEL 10- 4612 - 560 -56 10.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 289779 10/09/89 17.35 ID SERVICES INC BADGES 27- 4600 - 661 -66 61129 3957 17.35 * 289780 10/09/89 26.50 STATE OF MINNESOTA BOOKS 10- 4504 - 480 -48 26.50 * 289781 10/09/89 530.00 RAY OHERRON CO INC AMMUNITION 10- 4572 - 420 -42 199729 2422 530.00* �5e-29 * 289782 10/09/89 433.55 FRAN HOFFMAN REIMBURSEMENT 10- 4202- 240 -24 289782 10/09./89 95.00 FRAN HOFFMAN REIMBURSEMENT 10- 4206 - 260 -26 .528.55 * 289783 10/09/89 60.00 AM PUBLIC WORKS ASSN MEMBERSHIP 10- 4204 - 240 -24 9320 60.00 * 289784 10/09/89 12,500.00 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE DUES 10- 4204 - 140 -14 12,500.00 * 289785 10/09/89 2,096.64 STAR TRIBUNE BUDGET AD 10- 4214 - 500 -50 2,096.64 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 289787 10/09/89 42.00 CHESTER GROTH MUSIC MUSIC 10- 4596 - 627 -62 42.00 * 289788 10/09/89 65.20 MIDWEST LANDSCAPING SHRUBS 10- 4560 - 520 -52 18923 3823 65.20 * 289789 10/09/89 88.13 DITCH WITCH OF MN TOOLS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 5704 3938 88.13 * 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -16 -89 PAGE 6 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 289790 10/09/89 2,225.50 OUTSIDE SERVICES INC STUMP REMOVAL 10- 4250 - 644 -64 1644 2,225.50 * 289791 10/09/89 190.00 COLLEGE OF ST THOMAS SCHOOL 10- 4202 - 600 -60 190.00 * 289792 10/09/89 31.58 CARLSON EQUIP CO REPAIR PARTS - 10- 4540 - 560 -56 143480 3291 31.58 * * * * * ** * * * -CKS 289794 10/09/89 23.10 QUALITY ENGRAVING GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 430 -42 1958 23.10 * 289795 10/09/89 168.00 BETSY BRYANT AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 168.00 * 289796 10/09/89 958.00 MARIAN ALSTAD AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 958.00 * 289797 10/09/89 234.00 BOBO ZINN AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 234.00 * 289798 10/09/89 144.00 CYD WICKER AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 144.00 * 289799 10/09/89 540.00 MONICA RUDQUIST AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 540.00 * 289800 10/09/89 156.00 PHYLLIS PETERSON AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 156.00 * 289801 10/09/89 84.00 BETTY BELL PEDDIE AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 84.00 289802 10/09/89 192.00 DOROTHY ODLAND AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 192.00 * 289803 10/09/89 225.00 J THOMAS NELSON AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 225.00 * 289804 10/09/89 1,170.00 MARGARET MCDOWELL AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 1,170.00 * 289805 10/09/89 144.00 NICK LEGEROS AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 144.00 * 289806 10/09/89 80.00 PHYLLIS HAYWA AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 80.00 * 289807 10/09/89 240.00 MARGARET GUST AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 240.00 * 289808 10/09/89 168.00 HARRY HEIM AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 s 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 289809 289810 289811 289812 289813 289814 289815 289816 289817 289818 289819 289820 289821 289822 289823 289824 289825 289826 10/09/89 10/09/89 10/09/89 10/09/89 10/09/89 10/09/89 10/09/89 10/09/89 10/09/89 10/09/89 10%09/89 10/09/89 10/09/89 10/09/89 10/09/89 10/09/89 10/09/89 10/09/89 AMOUNT 168.00 399.00 399.00 * 40.00 40.00 * 104.00 104.00 * 150.00 150.00 * 360.00 360.00 150.00 150.00 450.00 450.00 25.50 25.50 1,890.00 1,890.00 * 196.00 196.00 * 70.00 70.00 * 50.00 50.00 * 50.00 50.00 * 30.00 30.00 * 75.00 75.00 * 40.00 40.00 * 75.00 75.00 640.00 640.00 n CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION BILL DIETRICHSON MAYME ESCHWEY BARBARA NELSON KATHY GUSTAFSON SUSAN FRAME DICK GREEN PAT GEISHEKER AGNES FINE METRO IMPROVEMENTS CITYLINE SALLY BONKRUDE RONNIE NEWMAN ROBERT ADNEY DON BATES JIM SCHATTAUER ST ANTHONY CYNTHIA KATZ LIZ GEREBI AC INSTRUCTOR AC INSTRUCTOR AC INSTRUCTOR AC INSTRUCTOR AC INSTRUCTOR AC INSTRUCTOR AC INSTRUCTOR AC INSTRUCTOR IMPROVEMENTS ADVVERTISING SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES PAYMENT 10 -16 -89 PAGE 7 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23-4201- 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 11- 4201 - 127 -12 30- 4214 - 781 -78 4023 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 3505 - 000 -00 ill 8 ®■ 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -16 -89 PAGE CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 289827 10/09/89 196.85 SALLY DIST INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 627 -62 30591 4010 196.85 * 289828 10/09/89 32.10 WARREN OSTLUND REFUND 40- 3800 - 000 -00 32.10 * 289829 10/09/89 8.60 BESS BROWN REFUND 40- 3800 - 000 -00 8.60 * 289830 10/09/89 35.00 AAGARD CARD BOARD 50- 4250 - 821 -82 289830 10/09/89 35.00 AAGARD CAARDBOARD 50- 4250 - 841 -84 289830 10/09/89 35.00 AAGARD CARD BOARD 50- 4250- 861 -86 105.00 * 289831' 10/09/89 75.00 MN DEPT OF LABOR REGISTRATION 10- 4202 - 140 -14 289831 10/09/89 75.00 MN DEPT OF LABOR REGISTRATION 10- 4202 - 140 -14 289831 10/09/89 75.00- MN DEPT OF LABOR REGISTRATION 10- 4202 - 140 -14 75.00 289832 10/09/89 41.03 NAOMI JOHNSON GENERAL SUPPLIES 23- 4120 - 612 -61 289832 10/09/89 33.72 NAOMI JOHNSON ADVERTISING 23- 4214 - 611 -61 289832 10/09/89 27.28 NAOMI JOHNSON CRAFT SUPPLIES 23- 4588 - 611 -61 102.03 289833 10/09/89 69.26 DAYTIMERS SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 140 -14 69.26 289834 10/09/89 116.00 SOUTHDALE PET HOSP PRO SERV ANIMAL 10- 4201 - 470 -47 116.00 289835 10/09/89 80.00 KATHY HONKEN REFUND 23- 3500- 000 -00 80.00 289836 10/09/89 45.00 MIKE WRESH SERVICES 23- 4120 - 612 -61 45.00 289837 10/09/89 30.00. COLLEEN HAAS AC PART TIME 23- 4120 - 612 -61 289837 10/09/89 240.00 COLLEEN HAAS AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 270.00 * 289838 10/09/89 540.00 JEAN GRAPP AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 289838 10/09/89 32.00 JEAN GRAPP AC CRAFT SUPP 23- 4588 - 611 -61 572.00 * 289839 10/09/89 558.00 TOBIE DICKER AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 289839 10/09/89 58.50 TOBIE DICKER CRAFT SUPPLIES 23- 4588 - 611 -61 616.50 * 289840 10/10/89 79,224.74 MIDWEST ASPHALT PAYMENT 60- 2040 - 000 -00 79,224.74 * 289841 10/10/89 21,645.75 EH RENNER & SONS PAYMENT 60- 2040 - 000 -00 21,645.75 * 289842 10/10/89 4,321.00 ZAHNER CONSTRUCTION WORK CONTRACT 11- 4201- 127 -12 8 ®■ 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 289843 289844 289845 289846 289847 289848 289849 289850 289851 289852 289853 289854 289855 289856 289857 289858 289859 289860 10/10/89 10/10/89 10/10/89 10/10/89 10/10/89 10/10/89 10/10/89 10/10/89 10/10/89 10/10/89 10/10/89 10/10/89 10/10/89 10/10/89 10/10/89 10/10/89 10/10/89 10/10/89 0 AMOUNT 4,321.00 14.00 14.00 * 12.00 12.00 * 41.97 41.97 * 195.00 195.00 * 38.50 38.50 * 236.00 236.00 * 133.50 133.50 * 3,000.00 3,000.00 * 72.00 72.00 * 23.97 23.97 * 23.63 23.63 * 231.00 231.00 * 21.00 21.00 * 29.93 29.93 * 21.00 21.00 * 308.00 308.00 * 25.20 25.20 * 29.40 29.40 * r CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION RUTH ROSEQUIST MARCIA ERICKSON GREG VANGEN ISIA LINDSKOOG LAATHAM FYI COMPUTER EMPIREHOUSE INC POSTMASTER BETSY BRYANT WALLACE FLANDERS AGNES FINE BRYAN MOON MARY EVE KRAUTER NANCY HAMMER JEAN HAEFELE DICK GREEN BARB RICHARDS MONIA RUDQUIST E] REFUND REFUND MILEAGE DUES GENERAL SUPPLIES AMBULANCE REFUND REPAIR DOOR POSTAGE ARTWORK SOLD ARTWORK SOLD ARTWORK SOLD ARTWORK SOLD ARTWORK SOLD ARTWORK SOLD ARTWORK SOLD ARTWORK SOLD ARTWORK SOLD ARTWORK SOLD i 10 -16 -89 PAGE 9 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 1145 - 000 -00 10- 1145 - 000 -00 28- 4208 - 701 -70 28- 4204 - 701 -70 4006 28- 4504 - 702 -70 3859 10- 3180 - 000 -00 28- 4248 - 702 -70 6165 3712 10- 4290 - 510 -51 23- 3625 - 000 -00 23- 3625 - 000 -00 23- 3625 - 000 -00 23- 3625 - 000 -00 23- 3625 - 000 -00 23- 3625 - 000 -00 23- 3625 - 000 -00 23- 3625- 000 -00 23- 3625 - 000 -00 I 23- 3625 - 000 -00 U 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -16 -89 PAGE 10 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 289861 10/10/89 21.00 ROSALIE WELLS ARTWORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 21.00 * 289862 10/10/89 133.00 BETTY PEDDIE ARTWORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00. 133.00 * 289863 10/10/89 .32.06 SPECIAL EFFECTS ARTWORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 32.06 * * * * * ** * * * -CKS 289865 10/10/89 18.33 MN AMVETS NEWS ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 822 -82 289865 10/10/89 18.33 MN AMVETS NEWS ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 842 -84 289865 10/10/89 18.34 MN AMVETS NEWS ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 862 -86 55.00 * 289866 10/10/89 184,905.95 GL CONTRACTING INC PAYMENT 60- 2040 - 000 -00 184,905.95 * 289867 10/10/89 99,637.90 LUNDA CONSTR CO PAYMENT 60- 2040 - 000 -00 99,637.90 * 289868 10/10/89 193,463.83 PROGRESSIVE PAYMENT 60- 2040 - 000 -00 193,463.83 * 289869 10/10/89 1,960.00 JOHN E OLSON SERVICES 60- 1270 - 000 -00 1,960.00 * 289870 10/10/89 36.00 BOBO ZINN ARTWORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 289870 10/10/89 94.20 BOBO ZINN CRAFT SUPPLIES 23- 4588 - 611 -61 289871 10/10/89 228 ?29* MOLLIE PAULSON ARTWORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 289871 10/10/89 173.74 MOLLIE PAULSON SERVICES 23- 4120 - 613 -61 402.03* i 944 * 289872 10/10/89 49.00 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS SCHOOL 40- 4206 - 000 -00 49.00 * 289873 10/10/89 146,111.71 VEIT & COMPANY PAYMENT 60- 2040 - 000 -00 146,111.71 * 289874 10/10/89 244.50 JOHNSTONS SALES /SERV GENERAL SUPPLIES 27 -4504- 662 -66 244.50 * 289875 10/10/89 612.00 BUDGET ELECTRIC INC CONSTRUCTION 27- 1300 - 001 -00 612.00 * 289876 10/10/89 45.00 PC EXPRESS CLEAN COMPUTER 27- 4248 - 669 -66 48782 3764 45.00 289877 10/10/89 205.26 OUTWATER PLASTICS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 490 -49 3775 205.26 289878 ' 10/10/89 � 72.13 ARMSTRONG t AMBULANCE SUPP 10- 4510 - 440 -44 17502 3241 qP 1 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION DAN G JOHNSON DRAIN REPAIRS SAFETY SYSTEM EM SCHOOL THEODORE PAULFRANZ BOOK 3M CO GENERAL SUPPLIES A -1 ROOTMASTER REPAIR DRAIN ALL -AMER BOTTLING MIX AIR HYDRAULIC SYSTEM FITTING ALBINSON FLAGGING TAPE ALBINSON FLAGGING TAPE ALBINSON PAINT ALBINSON BLUE PRINT PAPER ALBINSON GAMMON REELS ALTERNATOR REBUILD ALTERNATOR REBUILD ALTERNATOR REBUILD ALTERNATOR REBUILD AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE AMER LASER -CUT GRA REPAIR PARTS ROTOR STARTER BATTERY /FLASHLITE MEAT MEAT GENREAL SUPPLIES I . i 10 -16 -89 PAGE 11 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4248 - 440 -44 3249 i 10- 4202 - 440 -44 10- 4502 - 440 -44 10- 4504- 325 -30 * ** -CKS 3679 * ** -CKS 28- 4248 - 702 -70 63777 3528 50- 4632 - 862 -86 10- 4620 - 560 -56 A14563 3351 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 10- 4502- 260 -26 585009 10- 4504- 260 -26 589518 I 10- 4504 - 644 -64 587465 8742 Ij 10- 4570 - 260 -26 585096 j 10- 4604 - 260 -26 587017 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 13689 3670 10- 4540 - 560 -56 13688 3669 10- 4620 - 560 -56 9012 3752 10- 4642 - 560 -56 1714 3583 27- 4624 - 663 -66 8919 27- 4624 - 663 -66 i * ** -CKS 28- 4504 - 702 -70 64125 4007 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 72.13 * 289879 10/10/89 72.00 72.00 * 289880 10/10/89 880.00 880.00 * 289881 10/10/89 47.65 47.65 * 289A01 10/09/89 8.70 8.70 * * * * * ** 289A06 10/05/89 77.00 77.00 * 289A07 10/09/89 93.60 93.60 * * * * * ** 289A24 10/09/89 173.38 173.38 * * * * * ** 289A29 10/09/89 43.37 289A29 10/09/89 13.45 289A29 10/05/89 70.15 289A29 10/09/89 264.43 289A29 10/09/89 36.85 428.25 * * * * ** 289A39 10/05/89 96.70 289A39 10/05/89 28.70 289A39 10/09/89 42.90 289A39 10/05/89 187.75 356.05 * * * * ** 289A41 10/03/89 189.75 289A41 10/09/89 282.87 472.62 289A43 10/10/89 70.00 qP 1 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION DAN G JOHNSON DRAIN REPAIRS SAFETY SYSTEM EM SCHOOL THEODORE PAULFRANZ BOOK 3M CO GENERAL SUPPLIES A -1 ROOTMASTER REPAIR DRAIN ALL -AMER BOTTLING MIX AIR HYDRAULIC SYSTEM FITTING ALBINSON FLAGGING TAPE ALBINSON FLAGGING TAPE ALBINSON PAINT ALBINSON BLUE PRINT PAPER ALBINSON GAMMON REELS ALTERNATOR REBUILD ALTERNATOR REBUILD ALTERNATOR REBUILD ALTERNATOR REBUILD AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE AMER LASER -CUT GRA REPAIR PARTS ROTOR STARTER BATTERY /FLASHLITE MEAT MEAT GENREAL SUPPLIES I . i 10 -16 -89 PAGE 11 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4248 - 440 -44 3249 i 10- 4202 - 440 -44 10- 4502 - 440 -44 10- 4504- 325 -30 * ** -CKS 3679 * ** -CKS 28- 4248 - 702 -70 63777 3528 50- 4632 - 862 -86 10- 4620 - 560 -56 A14563 3351 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 10- 4502- 260 -26 585009 10- 4504- 260 -26 589518 I 10- 4504 - 644 -64 587465 8742 Ij 10- 4570 - 260 -26 585096 j 10- 4604 - 260 -26 587017 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 13689 3670 10- 4540 - 560 -56 13688 3669 10- 4620 - 560 -56 9012 3752 10- 4642 - 560 -56 1714 3583 27- 4624 - 663 -66 8919 27- 4624 - 663 -66 i * ** -CKS 28- 4504 - 702 -70 64125 4007 10 -16 -89 PAGE 12 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P..O. # MESSAGE 30- 4504 - 782 -78 64132 4024 30- 4504 - 782 -78 64115 3907 * ** -CKS 10-4274- 420 -42 33943 3759 * ** -CKS 10- 4262 - 440 -44 10- 4262 - 482 -48 10- 4262 - 520 -52 27- 4262 - 663 -66 50- 4262 - 821 -82 50- 4262- 841 -84 50- 4262 - 861 -86 * ** -CKS 28- 4624 - 703 -70 38657 3353 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 * ** -CKS 10- 4528- 314 -30 10216 10- 4528 - 314 -30 10078 10- 4528 - 314 -30 9630 1044 40- 4528 - 803 -80 9357 1044 40- 4552- 900 -80 9903 * ** -CKS 27- 4250 - 664 -66 10- 4262 - 301 -30 9407 * ** -CKS 30- 3505- 000 -00 30- 4504 - 781 -78 30- 4504 - 782 -78 30- 4512 - 781 -78 30- 4516 - 781 -78 30- 4660 - 782 -78 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 289A43 10/09/89 52.00 AMER LASER -CUT GRA GENERAL SUPPLIES 289A43 10/05/89 248.00 AMER LASER -CUT GRA GENERAL SUPPLIES 370.00 kkkk * k 289A45 10/03/89 220.00 AMER. PHOTO COPY EQUIP MAINT 220.00 k k k k k k 289A49 10/05/89 184.48 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 289A49 10/05/89 8.34 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 289A49 10/05/89 112.71 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 289A49 10/05/89 84.14 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 289A49 10/05/89 47.51_ AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 289A49 10/05/89 52.78 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 289A49 10/05/89 64.55 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 554.51 * kkkkkk. 289A76 10/03/89 221.50 ASPLUND COFFEE CONCESSIONS 221.50 * 289A80 10/09/89 41.20 ASTLEFORD INTL SEAL 41.20 kkkkkk - . 289A98 10/09/89 119.30 AVR INC CEMENT 289A98 10/09/89 405.18 AVR INC CEMENT 289A98 10/03/89 210.00 AVR INC CONCRETE 289A98 10/03/89 187.50 AVR INC CONCRETE 289A98 10/09/89 117.60 AVR INC CEMENT 1,039.58 * 289B02 10/09/89 65.75 BFI PORTABLE SERV GARBAGE 65.75 * 289803 10/03/89 27.03 BENSON GLASSES 27.03 * kkkkkk 289805 10/05/89 5.00 BACH -BILL REFUND 289B05 10/05/89 14.59 BACH -BILL GENERAL SUPPLIES 289805 10/05/89 35.65 BACH -BILL GENERAL SUPPLIES 289805 10/05/89 76.00 BACH -BILL BOOK 289805 10/05/89 19.72 BACH -BILL OFFICCE SUPPLIES 289805 10/05/89 3.98 BACH -BILL PLANT SUPPLIES 10 -16 -89 PAGE 12 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P..O. # MESSAGE 30- 4504 - 782 -78 64132 4024 30- 4504 - 782 -78 64115 3907 * ** -CKS 10-4274- 420 -42 33943 3759 * ** -CKS 10- 4262 - 440 -44 10- 4262 - 482 -48 10- 4262 - 520 -52 27- 4262 - 663 -66 50- 4262 - 821 -82 50- 4262- 841 -84 50- 4262 - 861 -86 * ** -CKS 28- 4624 - 703 -70 38657 3353 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 * ** -CKS 10- 4528- 314 -30 10216 10- 4528 - 314 -30 10078 10- 4528 - 314 -30 9630 1044 40- 4528 - 803 -80 9357 1044 40- 4552- 900 -80 9903 * ** -CKS 27- 4250 - 664 -66 10- 4262 - 301 -30 9407 * ** -CKS 30- 3505- 000 -00 30- 4504 - 781 -78 30- 4504 - 782 -78 30- 4512 - 781 -78 30- 4516 - 781 -78 30- 4660 - 782 -78 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 154.94 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 289B07 10/05/89 2,152.90 289B07 10/05/89 1,840.94 WATER METERS 40- 1220 - 000 -00 3,993.84 *Rk *IV It 289810 10/03/89 18.00 BALDWIN SUPPLY CO. HEATERS 18.00 * * * * * ** 3586 289813 10/09/89 160.50 289B13 10/03/89 1,673.17 * * * * ** 1,833.67 * 289B18 10/05/89 321.18 289B18 10/05/89 53.53 374.71 * ** -CKS I BATTERY WAREHOUSE BATTERY 289B22 10/09/89 1,252.95 289B22 10/09/89 743.70 289B22 10/09/89 1,622.10 289822 10/09/89 1,411.90 * ** -CKS BEER WHOLESALERS 5,030.65 * * * * ** 289B25 10/03/89 100.00 100.00 * * * * ** 50- 4630 - 842 -84 289B27 10/05/89 302.50 289B27 10/05/89 544.00 289627 10/05/89 490.50 * ** -CKS 1,337.00 * * * * ** 10- 4100 - 430 -42 289830 10/10/89 143.71 289B30 10/05/89 59.05 289630 10/05/89 7.20 289630 10/10/89 4.89 289B30 10/10/89 170.16 289630 10/05/89 113.51 289B30 10/05/89 23.32 289830 10/10/89 46.80 CHECK REGISTER 10 -16 -89 PAGE 13 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS BADGER METER INC WATER METERS 40- 1220 - 000 -00 598382 1802 BADGER METER INC WATER METERS 40- 1220 - 000 -00 599698 1802 * ** -CKS BALDWIN SUPPLY CO. HEATERS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 4305 3586 * ** -CKS BARR ENGINEERING NEW NINE HOLE 27- 1300 - 003 -00 BARR ENGINEERING PRO SERV ENG 41- 4201 - 900 -90 I * ** -CKS I BATTERY WAREHOUSE BATTERY 10- 4540 - 560 -56 62035 3515 BATTERY WAREHOUSE BATTERY 10- 4540 - 560 -56 62591 * ** -CKS BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 27- 4630 - 663 -66 BEER WHOLESALERS BEERE 50- 4630 - 822 -82 BEER WHOLESALERS BEERE 50- 4630 - 842 -84 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 50- 4630 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS BENNETT -WAYNE POLICE SERVICES 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DEL 50- 4626 - 822 -82 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DEL 50- 4626 - 842 -84 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DEL 50- 4626 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 160 -16 504961 BERTELSON BROS. INC. PENS /MARKERS 10- 4504 - 325 -30 161900 3567 BERTELSON BROS. INC. MECH PENCIL 10- 4504 - 325 -30 3567 BERTELSON BROS. INC. CASSETTE 10- 4504 - 420 -42 504961 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 510 -51 504961 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 502827 BERTELSON BROS. INC. SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 560 -56 502827 BERTELSON BROS. INC. EASIL PAD 27- 4516 - 661 -66 504484 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 289B30 10/05/89 57.87 289B30 10/05/89 42.48 289630 10/10/89 3.83 289630 10/05/89 3.35 676.17 k k k k k k 289B32 10/03/89 6.60 289832 10/05/89 43.25 289B32 10/05/89 10.00 59.85 k k k k k k 289B42 10/05/89 23.41 23.41 k k * k k k 289B61 10/03/89 292.55 289B61 10/03/89 292.55 - 289B61 10/03/89 292.55 289B61 10/03/89 18.00 310.55 * 289662 10/05/89 178.47 178.47 * kkkk *k 289677 10/10/89 120.20 - iRG-eB 289677 10/09/89 637.95 758.15* k k k k k k 289B82 10/10/89 143.45 143.45 kkkkkk 289891 10/05/89 729.60 289B91 10/10/89 496.80 1,226.40 k k k k k k 289C01 10/09/89 41.39 289C01 10/09/89 76.01 117.40 kkkkkk 289C09 10/09/89 95.35 LJ CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION BERTELSON BROS. INC. SUPPLIES BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES BERTELSON BROS. INC. PENCIL BERTELSON BROS. INC. TRAY BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS KEYS BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS REPAIR PARTS BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS LOCK PARTS BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY BOUSTEAD ELEC & MFG BOUSTEAD ELEC & MFG BOUSTEAD ELEC & MFG BOUSTEAD ELEC & MFG BOYUM EQUIPMENT OFFICE SUPPLIES REPAIR PUMP REPAIR PUMP REPAIR PUMP HEATER MUFFLER /PIPE BRAUN ENG TESTNG INC SERVICES BRAUN ENG TESTNG INC PRO SERV ENG t 10 -16 -89 PAGE 14 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 27- 4516 - 661 -66 502011 1775 27- 4546 - 661 -66 502152 1175 40- 4504 - 800 -80 504961 40- 4504 - 800 -80 502827 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 95236 3197 10- 4540 - 540 -54 95600 3451 10- 4540 - 646 -64 96298 3717 * ** -CKS 30- 4516 - 781 -78 902807 3885 40- 4248 - 801 -80 26'5448 2892 40- 4248 - 802 -80 265448 2892 40- 4248 - 802 -80 265448 2892 40- 4540 - 801 -80 266453 3498 10- 4540 - 560 -56 4141 5127 40- 4201 - 800 -80 18524 60- 1300 - 289 -04 18458 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS BRUNSON INSTRUMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 803 -80 8743 * ** -CKS BURY & CARLSON INC. BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 380 -30 BURY & CARLSON INC. BLACKTOP 10- 4524 7380 -30 * ** -CKS C & S DISTRIBUTING COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 093445 3780 C & S DISTRIBUTING COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 093311 3780 * ** -CKS CARLSON PRINTING BUSINESS CARDS 10- 4504 - 510 -51 45939 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION CDP CEDAR LAKE FLORAL CORE RESTORE COPY MACH RENTAL OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO ADS FOR BIDS CITY BEER BEER CITY BEER BEER CITY OF RICHFIELD POWER CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV WINDOW CLEANING CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV WINDOW CLEANING CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV WINDOW CLEANING COCA COLA BOTTLING MIX COCA COLA BOTTLING MIX COCA COLA BOTTLING MIX COMM OF REVENUE SALES i COMM 1989 CITY OF EDINA FUEL CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT REVENUE SALES 95.35 * * * * * ** OF REVENUE: 289C17 10/03/89 90.84 OF REVENUE 90.84* 289C18 10/05/89 30.00 REVENUE SALES 30.00 * * * * * ** OF REVENUE 289C23 10/10/89 49.00 OF REVENUE 49.00 * TAX 289C25 10/05/89 51.30 51.30 * * * * * ** 289C30 10/09/89 190.60 289C30 10/09/89 43.60 234.20 * * * * * ** 289C34 10/09/89 171.45 171.45 * * * * * ** 289C36 10/05/89 12.25 289C36 10/05/89 12.25 289C36 10/05/89 12.25 36.75 * * * * ** 289C44 10/09/89 148.85 289C44 10/09/89 526.60 289C44 10/09/89 487.49 1,162.94 * * * * ** 289C51 10/10/89 158.50 289C51 10/09/89 683.60 289C51 10/10/89 208.85 289C51 10/10/89 11.46 289C51 10/10/89 9,028.08 289C51 10/10/89 466.04 289C51 10/10/89 225.69 289C51 10/10/89 134.48 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION CDP CEDAR LAKE FLORAL CORE RESTORE COPY MACH RENTAL OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO ADS FOR BIDS CITY BEER BEER CITY BEER BEER CITY OF RICHFIELD POWER CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV WINDOW CLEANING CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV WINDOW CLEANING CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV WINDOW CLEANING COCA COLA BOTTLING MIX COCA COLA BOTTLING MIX COCA COLA BOTTLING MIX COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX COMM OF REVENUE FUEL TAX COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX COMM OF REVENUE: SALRS TAX COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX (2 checks - $683.60 and $47,331.55) AV 10 -16 -89 PAGE 15 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 540 -54 108792 30- 4516 - 781 -78 522980 1725 27- 4516- 661 -66 10- 4210 - 140 -14 105248 . 50- 4630 - 842 -84 50- 4630 - 862 -86 41- 4252 - 900 -90 50- 4248 - 821 - 82.3991 50- 4248 - 842 -84 3992 50- 4248 - 862 -86 3993 50- 4632 - 822 -82 50- 4632 - 842 -84 50- 4632 - 862 -86 10- 3357 - 000 -00 10- 4612- 560 -56 23- 3357 - 000 -00 26- 3357 - 000 -00 27- 3357 - 000 -00 28- 3357 - 000 -00 29- 3357 - 000700 30- 3357 - 000 =00 0' * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS lkl- AMOUNT 2,132.90 7,243.33 14,516.07 13,206.15 48,015.15.* 166.66 238.22 2,279.41 2,684.29 * 39.00 39.00 * 297.80 297.80 55.50 67.00 122.50 135.00 135.00 50.09 50.09 190.74 190.74-* 45.60 45.60 * 96.51 96.51 * 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 289C51 10/10/89 289051 10/10/89 289C51 10/10/89 289C51 10/10/89 * * * * ** 289C64 10/09/89 289C64 10/09/89 289C64 10/09/89 * * * * ** 289C66 10/05/89 * * * * ** 50- 3357- 001 -00 289C88 10/03/89 * * * * ** COMM OF REVENUE 289C92 10/10/89 289C92 10/10/89 * * * * ** COMM OF REVENUE 289C97 10/09/89 * * * * ** 289D07 10/03/89 * * * * ** 289D27 10/05/89 * * * * ** 289D29 10/09/89 * * * * ** 27- 4504 - 663 -66 289D45 10/05/89 * * * * ** CONT- MINNESOTA lkl- AMOUNT 2,132.90 7,243.33 14,516.07 13,206.15 48,015.15.* 166.66 238.22 2,279.41 2,684.29 * 39.00 39.00 * 297.80 297.80 55.50 67.00 122.50 135.00 135.00 50.09 50.09 190.74 190.74-* 45.60 45.60 * 96.51 96.51 * CHECK REGISTER 10 -16 -89 PAGE 16 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX 40- 3357 - 000 -00 COMM OF REVENUE SALRS TAX 50- 3357- 001 -00 COMM OF REVENUE SALRS TAX 50- 3357 - 002 -00 COMM OF REVENUE SALRS TAX 50- 3357 - 003 -00 * ** -CKS CONT- MINNESOTA SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 663 -66 CONT- MINNESOTA CLEANING 27- 4512 - 663 -66 CONT- MINNESOTA FOOD 27- 4624 - 663 -66 i * ** -CKS CONTACT MOBILE COMM. REPAIR WORK 10- 4294 - 560 -56 12330 3569 * ** -CKS CURTIS 1000 PRINTING 23 -4600- 611 -61 451630 2786 * ** -CKS CUSTOM FIRE APP CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 440 -44 002790 3849 CUSTOM FIRE APP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 440 -44 002790 3849 * ** -CKS CYLINDER CITY ROD CYLINDER 10- 4540 - 560 -56 24577 3677 * ** -CKS D. C. HEY CO. SERVICE CONTRACT 30- 4288 - 781 -78 108467 3856 * ** -CKS DAVE S FOOD WAGON DAIRY 27- 4624- 663 -66 8421 * ** -CKS DAVIDSEN DIST. INC. BEER 50- 4630 - 842 -84 * ** -CKS DELEGARD TOOL CO., CHARGER 10- 4580 - 301 -30 56632 3355 * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -16 -89 PAGE 17 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 289D61 10/03/89 100.00 DICK NISSEN POLICE SERVICES 10- 4100 - 430 -42 100.00 k k k k k k - * ** -CKS 289D67 10/09/89 157.64 66.8? DOALL TWIN CITIES CO SAWBLADE 10- 4580 - 560 -56 3560 157.64* -* kkkkkk * ** -CKS 289D79 289D79 10/03/89 10/03/89 14,563.35 22,813.43 DORSEY & WHITNEY DORSEY & WHITNEY LEGAL 10- 4218 - 220 -22 367499 289D79 10/03/89 26,125.00 DORSEY & WHITNEY LEGAL LEGAL 10- 4218 - 220 -22 10- 4218 - 220 -22 367500 364773 63,501.78 kkkkkk * ** -CKS 289E14 289E14 10/10/89 10/09/89 89.04 194.56 EARL F. ANDERSON EARL F. ANDERSON SERVICES 10 -4201- 647 -64 91839 4033 289E14 10/09/89 264.72 EARL F. ANDERSON SIGNS SIGNS 10- 4504 - 646 -64 10- 4540 - 375 -30 91483 91436 3517 3508 289E14 10/05/89 79.70 EARL F. ANDERSON SIGNS 10- 4540- 520 -52 91345 3285 628.02 kkkkkk * ** -CKS 289E17 10/09/89 3,676.60 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER 50- 4630 - 822 -82 289E17 10/09/89 6,842.00 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER 50- 4630 - 842 -84 289E17 10/09/89 5,981.65 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER 50- 4630 - 862 -86 16,500.25 k k k k k k * ** -CKS 289E32 10/09/89 670.88- EASTMAN KODAK CO SERV AGREEMENT 10- 4288 - 510 -51 289E32 10/09/89 670.88 EASTMAN KODAK CO SERV AGREEMENTE 10- 4288 - 510 -51 289E32 10/09/89 670.80 EASTMAN KODAK CO SERV AGREEMENT 10- 4288 - 510 -51 670.80-* k *kkRk * ** -CKS 289E57 10/03/89 221.83 E -Z SHARP INC SHARPENER SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 702 -70 0999 3067 221.83 kkkkkk * ** -CKS 289E71 10/09/89 61.89 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY EAR PLUGS 10- 4642 - 301 -30 2591 61.89 kkkkkk * ** -CKS 289F11 10/05/89 2,899.26 FEED RITE CONTROL WATER CHEMICALS 40- 4622 - 805 -80 129771 1670 2,899.26 * ** -CKS 289F21 10/10/89 7,816.00 FLANAGAN SALES EQUIPMENT 10- 4201 - 647 -64 4110 3145 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -16 -89 PAGE 18 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 7,816.00 * kkkkkk * ** -CKS 289F26 10/05/89 437.90 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 810 -80 3147 3676 437.90 * k k k k k k * ** -CKS 289F56 10/09/89 3,592.00 FRANK B. HALL & CO. INSURANCE 10- 4260 - 510 -51 289F56 10/09/89 11.00 FRANK B. HALL & CO. INSURANCE 10- 4260 - 510 -51 3,603.00 k k k k k k * ** -CKS 289G01 10/10/89 585.50 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 301 -30 289G01 10/10/89 329.20 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 560 -56 289G01 10/10/89 312.15 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 646 -64 289G01 10/10/89 273.75 G & K SERVICES CLEANING SUPPLIES 10- 4512 - 540 -54 289G01 10/10/89 61.80 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 28- 4262 - 702 -70 289G01 10/10/89 20.10 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 30- 4262 - 782 -78 289G01 10/10/89 323.32 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 40- 4262 - 801 -80 1,905.82 * ** -CKS 289G20 10/09/89 55.09 GENE SEARS SUPPLY CONTRACTED REPAIRS 29- 4248 - 722 -72 95299 2432 55.09 * ** -CKS 289G24 10/09/89 19.00 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 301 -30 31975 289G24 10/05/89 13.00 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS RADIO SERVICES 10- 4248 - 440 -44 55236 1325 289G24 10/09/89 465.00 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS RADIO 10 -4294- 560 -56 55238 4390 289G24 10/09/89 266.25 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS CONTRACT 10- 4294 - 560 -56 31974 289G24 10/03/89 111.90 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS CRYSTAL 10- 4294 - 560 -56 54996 289G24 10/03/89 58.02 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS CONNECTOR 10- 4294 - 560 -56 54997 289G24 10/09/89 465.00 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS RADIO 10- 4294 - 560 -56 55239 4399 289G24 10/09/89 465.00 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS RADIO 10- 4901 - 260 -26 55241 4401 289G24 10/09/89 465.00 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS RADIO 10- 4901 - 260 -26 55240 2,328.17 k k k k k k * ** -CKS 289G26 10/09/89 22.88 GENERAL OFFICE PROD GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 289G26 10/10/89 170.00 GENERAL OFFICE PROD GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 4038 192.88 * ** -CKS 289G29 10/03/89 283.00 GENERAL REPAIR SERV SUMP PUMP 40- 4540 - 801 -80 5362 3743 283.00 - * ** -CKS 289G38 10/03/89 100.00 GEORGE BUTLER POLICE SERVICE 10- 4100- 430 -42 HAROLD SWANSON HARRIS HOMEYER CO HARRIS HOMEYER CO HARRIS HOMEYER CO HENN CTY SHERIFF HENN CTY MED CENTER HENN TECH CENTER HENN TECH CENTER HOFFMAN- WILLIAM POLICE SERVICES INSURANCE INSURANCE INSURANCE BOOKING FEES 10- 4100 - 430 -42 10- 4260 - 510 -51 10- 4260- 510 -51 10- 4260 - 510 -51 10- 4286 - 220 -22 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS AMBULANCE SUPP 10- 4540 - 440 -44 520 3848 FFII TRAINING 10- 4202 - 440 -44 020250 3844 FFII TRAINING 10- 4202 - 440 =44 020262 POLICE SERVICE 10- 4100 - 430 -'42 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK.REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 10 -16 -89 PAGE 19 100.00 * kkkkk ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 289G62 10/03/89 102.00 102.00 * kkkkk POPCORN 27- 4624 - 663 -66 289G68 10/03/89 166.84 289G68 10/03/89 23.74 289G68 10/03/89 248.78 REPAIR PARTS 289G68 10/03/89 274.23 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. 713.59 * kkkkkk 3667 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC 289G96 10/09/89 4.00 430558 3590 4.00 * kkkkk k 40- 4504 - 807 -80 935971 3662 289G99 10/10/89 114.90 114.90 * ** -CKS kkkkk k INK /RECORDERS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 289H22 .10/03/89 100.00 100.00 289H23 10/09/89 27,829.00 CASH REGISTER /CLEAN 289H23 10/09/89 2,188.00 289H23 10/09/89 5,194.00 kkkkk k 35,211.00 289H33 10/09/89 312.40 312.40 k k k k k 289H36 10/10/89 1,125.06 1,125.06 289H37 10/05/89 240.00 289H37 10/05/89 60.00 300.00 * kkkkkk 289H65 10/03/89 100.00 100.00 * kkkkkk HAROLD SWANSON HARRIS HOMEYER CO HARRIS HOMEYER CO HARRIS HOMEYER CO HENN CTY SHERIFF HENN CTY MED CENTER HENN TECH CENTER HENN TECH CENTER HOFFMAN- WILLIAM POLICE SERVICES INSURANCE INSURANCE INSURANCE BOOKING FEES 10- 4100 - 430 -42 10- 4260 - 510 -51 10- 4260- 510 -51 10- 4260 - 510 -51 10- 4286 - 220 -22 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS AMBULANCE SUPP 10- 4540 - 440 -44 520 3848 FFII TRAINING 10- 4202 - 440 -44 020250 3844 FFII TRAINING 10- 4202 - 440 =44 020262 POLICE SERVICE 10- 4100 - 430 -'42 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS CHECK.REGISTER 10 -16 -89 PAGE 19 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS GRANDMA S CUPBOARD POPCORN 27- 4624 - 663 -66 * ** -CKS GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 322 -30 908919 2697 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. EXIT LITE 10- 4540 - 540 -54 936805 3667 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. WIRE 40- 4504- 807 -80 430558 3590 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. WIRE /SPLICE 40- 4504 - 807 -80 935971 3662 * ** -CKS GUY SPEAKER CO. INK /RECORDERS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 3737 * ** -CKS GOPHER CASH REGISTER CASH REGISTER /CLEAN 27- 4248 - 669 -66 9647 4040 * ** -CKS HAROLD SWANSON HARRIS HOMEYER CO HARRIS HOMEYER CO HARRIS HOMEYER CO HENN CTY SHERIFF HENN CTY MED CENTER HENN TECH CENTER HENN TECH CENTER HOFFMAN- WILLIAM POLICE SERVICES INSURANCE INSURANCE INSURANCE BOOKING FEES 10- 4100 - 430 -42 10- 4260 - 510 -51 10- 4260- 510 -51 10- 4260 - 510 -51 10- 4286 - 220 -22 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS AMBULANCE SUPP 10- 4540 - 440 -44 520 3848 FFII TRAINING 10- 4202 - 440 -44 020250 3844 FFII TRAINING 10- 4202 - 440 =44 020262 POLICE SERVICE 10- 4100 - 430 -'42 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS ty 10 -16 1989 CITY OF EDINA ACCOUNT NO. INV. CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 3795 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 289H85 10/09/89 36.50 HUMPHREY RADIATOR HEATER COVE 36.50 * 10- 4504 - 643 -64 45099 289I23 10/05/89 15.00 INDELCO CORP IRRIGATION PAARTS 15.00 * * ** —CKS 289I45 10/10/89 26.00 INGMAN LAB INC. LAB TEST 26.00 e� k * R k * k x**—CKS 10- 4504 - 510 -51 289I49 10/10/89 56.02 INMAC COMPUTER SUPPLIES * ** —CKS 56.02 121018 3565 289I61 10/05/89 342.70 * ** —(;KS INTERSTATE 10- 4248 - 560 -56 FILTER KIT kkk * k k 342.70 10- 4540 - 560 -56 69067 3357 289I77 10/03/89 94.46 ISI METER REPAIR 289I77 10/03/89 24.30 ISI REPAIR PARTS * ** —CKS 118.76 k k k k k k 23- 4504 - 611 -61 289J23 10/05/89 70.90 23- 4588 - 611 -61 JR JOHNSON SUP PLANT SUPPLIES 70.90 * ** —CKS 23- 4600 - 611 -61 k k k k k k 3783 289J27 10/10/89 111.53 JERRYS FOODS kkk —CKS SUPPLIES 289J27 10/10/89 95.09 JERRYS FOODS GENERAL SUPPLIES 289J27 10/09/89 29.17 10- 4540 - 560 -56 JERRYS FOODS 3509 GENERAL SUPPLIES 289J27 10/10/89 133.86 JERRYS FOODS CRAFT SUPPLIES 369.65 k k k k k k 289J35 10/03/89 119.69 JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING 119.69 k k k k k k 289K05 10/05/89 56.85 K & K SALES REPAIR DOORS 56.85 k k k k k k 289K09 10/05/89 110.40 KAMAN BEARING & SPLY ROLLER CHAIN 10 -16 -89 PAGE 20 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4248 - 560 -56 3795 * ** —CKS ;4 e 10- 4504 - 643 -64 45099 3731 * ** —CKS 10- 4200 - 482 -48 e� x**—CKS 10- 4504 - 510 -51 3893 * ** —CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 121018 3565 * ** —(;KS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 69273 3357 10- 4540 - 560 -56 69067 3357 * ** —CKS 30- 4660- 781 -78 41610 3872 * ** —CKS 10- 4212 - 510 -51 10- 4504 - 440 -44 23- 4504 - 611 -61 23- 4588 - 611 -61 * ** —CKS 23- 4600 - 611 -61 7457 3783 kkk —CKS ` 28- 4248 - 702 -70 42841 3882 ., * ** —CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 3509 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE * * * * ** 110.40 * 289K23 10/05/89 * * * * ** 289K35 10/05/89 289K35 10/09/89 289K35 10/05/89 289K35 10/05/89 289K35 10/10/89 289K35 10/03/89 289K35 10/05/89 * * * * ** 289K38 10/10/89 289L06 10/09/89 * * * * ** 289L28 10/09/89 289L28 10/09/89 289L28 10/05/89 289L28 10/05/89 289L28 10/09/89 289L28 10/05/89 ' * * * * ** 32.37 28906 10/05/89 * * * * ** 536445 289L97 10/03/89 * * * * ** KNOX COMM CREDIT 289M02 10/05/89 289M02 10/05/89 * * * * ** 34.00 ill CHECK REGISTER 10 -16 -89 PAGE 21 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 110.40 * * ** -CKS 549.01 KELLY SERVICES TEMP CLERICAL 10- 4201 - 600 -60 549.01 * * ** -CKS 150.92 KNOX COMM CREDIT ART SUPPLIES 23- 4504 - 612 -61 532198 3801 32.37 KNOX COMM CREDIT SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 664 -66 536445 3624 55.46 KNOX COMM CREDIT SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 664 -66 509136 3857 34.00 KNOX COMM CREDIT PAINT SUPPLIES 27- 4544 - 662 -66 432142 3779 92.41 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER 27- 4604 - 664 -66 532328 3891 44.96 KNOX COMM CREDIT REPAIR 28- 4248 - 702 -70 508876 3756 22.53 KNOX COMM CREDIT REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 704 -70 526451 3622 432.65.* * ** -CKS 40.00 KNUTSON -JIM MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 160 -16 40.00 * ** -CKS 240.00 LAKE RESTORATION WEED CONTROL 41- 4248 - 902 -90 4040 3936 240.00 * ** -CKS 79.32 LAWSON PRODUCTS SUPPLIES_ 10- 4504 - 322 -30 3648 213.46 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 10- 4504 - 325 -.30 3646 143.99 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 10- 4504 - 646 -64 3511 375.87 LAWSON PRODUCTS NUTS /BOLTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 3493 349.89 LAWSON PRODUCTS- PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 3645 445.56 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 3378 1,608.09 * ** -CKS 50.00 LEFFLER PRINTING PRINTING 30- 4600 - 781 -78 38885 38778 50.00 * ** -CKS 100.00 MERFELD -BERT POLICE SERVICES 10- 4100 - 430 -42; 100.00 * ** -CKS 142.92 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. PULLEY 10- 4540 - 560 - 56.98622 3576 349.11 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 - 56:98753 492.03 * • 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -16 -89 PAGE 22 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 289M04 10/05/89 360.25 MAGNUSON SOD•CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 289M04 10/05/89 228.77 MAGNUSON SOD CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 318 -30 289M04 10/05/89 255.00 MAGNUSON SOD CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 803 -80 289M04 10/05/89. 285.00 MAGNUSON SOD CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 900 -80 1,129.02 * J * * * * ** * ** -CKS 289M07 10/09/89 6,293.35 MARK VII SALES BEER 50- 4630 - 842 -84 r 289M07 10/09/89 6,616.20 MARK VII SALES BEER 50- 4630 - 862 -86 12,909.55 *" * * * * ** * ** -CKS 289M14 10/10/89 25.00 MAUMA DUES 10- 4204 - 140 -14 25.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 289M16 10/05/89 160.00 MCCAREN DESIGNS TREES /FLOWERS /SHRUBS 30- 4660 - 783 -78 1640 3896 160.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 289M19 10/09/89 1,731.22 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 289M19 10/09/89 60.84 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY TOOLS 10- 4580 - 560 -56 289M19 10/09/89 44.70 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 289M19 10/09/89 119.32 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 289M19 10/09/89 40.42 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 40- 4504 - 805 -80 1,996.50 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 289M25 10/10/89 22.50 MED OXYGEN & EQUIP DEMURRAGE SEPT 10- 4274 - 440 -44 1324 22.50 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 289M27 10/05/89 44.85- MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 22565 3588 289M27 10/05/89 289.00 MERIT SUPPLY - GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 301 -30 22573 3651 289M27 10/05/89 44.85 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES .4504- 10- 4504 - 301 -30 22565 3588 289M27 10/05/89 373.75 MERIT SUPPLY SOIL STERILANT 10- 4504 - 301 -30 22589 3589 289M27 10/05/89 448.50 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 22565 3588 %. 289M27 10/05/89 292.40 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 325 -30 22590 3663 �. 289M27 10/05/89 495.00 MERIT SUPPLY WASH /WAX 10- 4620 - 560 -56 22598 3672 289M27 10/05/89 364.00 MERIT SUPPLY REPAIR CHARGER 28- 4248 - 702 -70 22659 3858 289M27 10/05/89 278.80 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 28- 4512 - 702 -70 22645 3772 289M27 10/03/89 383.80 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 30- 4512 - 782 -78 22621 3761 J 289M27 10/03/89 948.00 MERIT SUPPLY CONSTRUCTION 60- 1300 - 005 -20 22632 3710 3,873.25 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 289M35 10/05/89 7,400.25 METRO WASTE CONTROL PERMITS 10- 3095- 000 -00 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10- 4524 - 301 - 302490 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 10- 4524 - 314 -30 7,400.25 10- 4524 - 314 -30 k *kkk* 10- 4524 - 380 -30 289M42 10/03/89 2,588.85 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. SERVICES 289M42 10/03/89 600.26 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 289M42 10/10/89 143.61 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 289M42 10/03/89 3,7.16.80 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 289M42 10/10/89 4,773.56 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 289M42 10/10/89 624.00 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 289M42 10/03/89 499.04 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. CONSTRUCTION 12,946.12 * ** -CKS 50- 4632 - 822 -82 289M44 10/03/89 363.33 MIDWEST CHEM SUPPLY PAPER SUPPLIES 50- 4632 - 862 -86 363.33 i kkkkkk 27- 4256 - 662 -66 26584 3884 289M46 10/09/89 131.45 METZ BAKING CO BREAD 289M46 10/05/89 167.64 METZ BAKING CO BREAD 299.09 kkkkkk 289M51 10/09/89 143.30 MIDWEST WIRE & STEEL STOCK FENCE 143.30 289M54 10/03/89 87.00 MILLER -DAVIS CO. BOOK 87.00 289M57 10/09/89 80,558.19 MILLER- DUNWIDDIE ADDITION 80,558.19 k k k k k k 289M63 10/09/89 105.07 MN. BAR MIX 289M63 10/09/89 249.75 MN. BAR MIX 289M63 10/09/89 403.52 MN. BAR MIX 758.34 289M66 10/05/89 203.85 MN BUSINESS SYS PHONE 203.85 kkkkkk 289M68 10/03/89 62.56 MN. CELLULAR TEL. PHONE 289M68 10/03/89 187.20 MN. CELLULAR TEL. CAR PHONE 10 -16 -89 PAGE 23 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 647 -64 2490 10- 4524 - 301 - 302490 10- 4524 - 301 -30 10- 4524 - 314 -30 10- 4524 - 314 -30 10- 4524 - 380 -30 60- 1300 - 011 -20 2490 * ** -CKS 10- 4514 - 520 -52 26014 3556 * ** -CKS j 27- 4624 - 663 -66 27- 4624 - 663 -66 8925 * ** -CKS I 10- 4504 - 301 -30 15933 3659 i * ** -CKS 10- 4504- 100 -10 658547 3790 * ** -CKS 60- 1300 - 015 -20 * ** -CKS 50- 4632 - 822 -82 50- 4632 - 842 -84 50- 4632 - 862 -86 i * ** -CKS 27- 4256 - 662 -66 26584 3884 * ** -CKS i 10- 4204 - 100 -10 10- 4204 - 140 -14 807727 lA0 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 289M68 10/09/89 * * * * ** 289M70 10/09/89 289M70 10/03/89 289M70 10/05/89 289M70 10/05/89 289M70 10/03/89 289M70 10/05/89 * * * * ** 289M73 10/09/89 289M73 10/09/89 289M73 10/09/89 * * * * ** 289M80 10/05/89 289M80 10/05/89 289M80 10/10/89 289M81 10/03/89 289M81 10/03/89 289M81 10/03/89 289M81 10/03/89 289M81 10/05/89 289M81 10/05/89 289M81 10/05/89 * * * * ** 289M93 10/10/89 * * * * ** 289N07 10/03/89 289N08 10/05/89 * * * * ** 289N16 10/10/89 289N16 10/10/89 * * * * ** AMOUNT 294.55 544.31 60.25 5.25 41.75 11.75 122.75 19.25 261.00 89.30 78.31 177.70 345.31 * 104.57 140.40 1,682.00 1,926.97 * 10.56 15.91 413.31 8.93 70.08 91.00 364.65 974.44 * 20.70 20.70 * 317.80 317.80 * 239.75 239.75 * 17.28 16.27 33.55 * CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION MN. CELLULAR TEL. EQUIP RENTAL MN. CONWAY MN. CONWAY MN. CONWAY MN. CONWAY MN. CONWAY MN. CONWAY MN. ELEVATOR MN. ELEVATOR MN. ELEVATOR MN SUBURBAN NEWS MN SUBURBAN NEWS MN SUBURBAN NEWS MN. TORO INC. MN. TORO INC. MN. TORO INC. MN. TORO INC. MN. TORO INC. MN. TORO INC. MN. TORO INC. MOTOROLA MTS NW SOUND MUELLER SALES CORP N.S.P. COMPANY N.S.P. COMPANY GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACT EQUIP NEW EXT EXT RECHARGE SAFETY EQUIP SERVICCE CONTRACT CONTRACT SERV CONTRACT SERV CONTRACT SERV LEGAL PUBLICATION WANT AD PRINTING SEAT /PLUG PLUG /SEAT WHEEL BEARING SEAT /SPRING /PLUG REPAIR PARTS. REPAIR PARTS MOWER ROLLERS RADIO .SERVICE 10 -16 -89 PAGE 24 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4226 - 420 -42 10- 4504 - 520 -52 23- 4248 - 612 -61 26- 4201 - 682 -68 27- 4288 - 667 -66 28- 4642 - 701 -70 30- 4288 - 782 -78 136728 3372 136732 136731 136731 136727 137519 3886 30- 4288 - 782 -78 90424 4026 30- 4288 - 782 -78 308596 30- 4288 - 782 -78 308546 10- 4210 - 140 -14 10- 4212 - 510 -51 30- 4600 - 781 -78 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10- 4540 - 560 -56 27- 4540 - 664 -66 27- 4540 - 664 -66 27- 4540 - 664 -66 783015 3524 783769 781281 3359 783520 3524 783696 3554 783703 3638 782447 3544 10- 4248 - 440 -44 1329 GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 77509 3854 GUAGES 40- 4540 - 801 -80 24486 3522 POWER 27- 4252 - 664 -66 POWER 27- 4252 - 664 -66 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -16 -89 PAGE 25 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # i MESSAGE 289N21 10/09/89 78.73 NAPA AUTO PARTS REPAIR PAARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 530712 3753 289N21 10/05/89 3.05 NAPA AUTO PARTS SPRINGS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 528861 3678 289N21 10/09/89 33.14 NAPA AUTO PARTS GASK SET 10- 4540 - 560 -56 530713 3753 114.92 289N22 10/10/89 117.59 NATL GUARDIAN SYS. ALARM SERVICE 28- 4304 - 702 -70 144613 289N22 10/05/89 161.91 NATL GUARDIAN SYS. ALARM SYSTEM 50- 4304 - 821 -82 144714 289N22. 10/05/89 184.78 NATL GUARDIAN SYS. ALARM SERVICE 50- 4304 - 861 -86 144713 464.28 * * * * ** �on►i*e n'inn ion . n-r ;n NO STAR AGP•HA6T G96T•T99G96 69699 — 29 4624 61@ 61 164669 1786 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS I 289N48 10/10/89 10.65 NO STAR TURF MOWER PARTS 27- 4540- 664 -66 174950 3863 10.65 * ** -CKS 289N68 10/09/89 133.92 NORTHSTAR ICE MIX 50- 4632 - 822 -82 289N68 10/09/89 340.74 NORTHSTAR ICE MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 289N68 10/09/89 289.98 NORTHSTAR ICE MIX 50- 4632 - 862 -86 764.64 289N82 10/09/89 197.79 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 164660 1786 * ** -CKS � 289N82 10/09/89 27.35 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 164523 3782 289N82 10/03/89 26.33 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 164071 3532 251.47* 8 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 289017 10/05/89 306.55 •OFFICE PRODUCTS SERVICE CONTRACT 10- 4288 - 510 -51 091672 3860 289017 10/09/89 198.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS SERV CONTRACT 30- 4288 - 781 -78 092295 4027 504.55 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 289030 10/10/89 143.01 OLD DUTCH FOODS CHIPS 27- 4624 - 663 -66 143.01 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 289036 10/05/89 223.80 OLSON CHAIN & CABLE STEEL CHAIN 40- 4540 - 801 -80 91936 3653 223.80 289037 10/09/89 90.00 BILL OLSON BLACK DIRT 10- 4562 - 643 -64 289037 10/05/89 145.00 BILL OLSON BLACK DIRT 27- 4562 - 664 -66 3739 289037 10/09/89 48.00 BILL OLSON BLACK DIRT 40- 4552 - 900 -80 283.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS Amo 10 -16 -89 PAGE 26 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 30- 4288 - 782 -78 41074 3906 10- 4246 - 640 -64 50- 4632 - 822 -82 50- 4632 - 842 -84 50- 4632- 862 -86 10- 4212 - 510 -51 10- 4201 - 440 -44 7897 10- 1139 - 000 -00 10- 4201- 504 -50 10- 4202 - 600 -60 10- 4206- 140 -14 10- 4206 - 160 -16 10- 4206 - 200 -20 10- 4206 - 490 -49 10- 4208 - 120 -12 10.- 4208 - 140 -14 10- 4208 - 480 -48 10- 4208 - 490 -49 10- 4209 - 490 -49 10- 4209 - 490 -49 10- 4504 - 100 -10 10- 4504 - 140 -14 10- 4504 - 200 -20 10- 4504 - 260 -26 10- 4504 - 480 -48 10- 4504 - 627 -62 26- 4504 - 682 -68 26- 4504 - 682 -68 26- 4512 - 682 -68 28- 4248 - 702 -70 28- 4504 - 703 -70 29- 4204 - 721 -72 29- 4504 - 721 -72 i * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 289050 10/05/89 189.23 OWENS SERVICE CO SERVICE CONRACT 189.23 * * * * * ** 289P11 10/03/89 237.00 PARK NIC MED CTR PHYSICAL 237.00 * * * * * ** 289P30 10/09/89 86.30 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING MIX 289P30 10/09/89 430.90 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING MIX 289P30 10/09/89 176.05 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING MIX 693.25 * 289P31 10/03/89 1,250.00 PETER COTTON TRAINING 1,250.00 * 289P34 10/05/89 100.00 PERSONNEL DECISIONS FEES FOR SERVICES 100.00 289P36 10/10/89 48.50 PETTY CASH FOOD 289P36 10/10/89 5.30 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 289P36 - 10/10/89 20.80 PETTY CASH DUES 289P36 10/10/89 7.00 PETTY CASH MEETING EXP 289P36 10/10/89 5.92 PETTY CASH PARKING 289P36 10/10/89 40.00 PETTY CASH MEETING EXP 289P36 10/10/89 15.00 PETTY CASH MEETING EXP 289P36 10/10/89 5.00 PETTY CASH PARKING 289P36 10/10/89 24.21 PETTY CASH PARKING 289P36 10/10/89 1.10 PETTY CASH PARKING 289P36 10/10/89 2.15 PETTY CASH PARKING 289P36 10/10/89 2.15 PETTY CASH PARKING 289P36 10/10/89 2.15- PETTY CASH PARKING 289P36 10/10/89 4.00 PETTY CASH GENERAL SUPPLIES 289P36 10/10/89 90.46 PETTY CASH GENERAL SUPPLIES 289P36 10/10/89 3.79 PETTY CASH GENERAL SUPPLIES - 289P36 10/10/89 3.45 PETTY CASH GENERAL SUPPLIES 289P36 10/10/89 11.48 PETTY CASH GENERAL SUPPLIES 289P36 10/10/89 11.99 PETTY CASH GENERAL SUPPLIES 289P36 10/10/89 4.23 PETTY CASH GENERAL SUPPLIES 289P36 10/10/89 16.28 PETTY CASH GENERAL SUPPLIES 289P36 10/10/89 4.10 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 289P36 10/10/89 58.63 PETTY CASH ARENA EXP 289P36 10/10/89 8.12 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 289P36 10/10/89 15.00 PETTY CASH GUN RANGE EXP 289P36 10/10/89 4.84 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES * * * * ** 411.35 10 -16 -89 PAGE 26 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 30- 4288 - 782 -78 41074 3906 10- 4246 - 640 -64 50- 4632 - 822 -82 50- 4632 - 842 -84 50- 4632- 862 -86 10- 4212 - 510 -51 10- 4201 - 440 -44 7897 10- 1139 - 000 -00 10- 4201- 504 -50 10- 4202 - 600 -60 10- 4206- 140 -14 10- 4206 - 160 -16 10- 4206 - 200 -20 10- 4206 - 490 -49 10- 4208 - 120 -12 10.- 4208 - 140 -14 10- 4208 - 480 -48 10- 4208 - 490 -49 10- 4209 - 490 -49 10- 4209 - 490 -49 10- 4504 - 100 -10 10- 4504 - 140 -14 10- 4504 - 200 -20 10- 4504 - 260 -26 10- 4504 - 480 -48 10- 4504 - 627 -62 26- 4504 - 682 -68 26- 4504 - 682 -68 26- 4512 - 682 -68 28- 4248 - 702 -70 28- 4504 - 703 -70 29- 4204 - 721 -72 29- 4504 - 721 -72 i * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS n,�� 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 289P48 10/05/89 * * * * ** VENDOR 289P54 10/05/89 * * * * ** PRINTING 289P58 10/05/89 * * * * ** 447.00 289P64 10/05/89 * * * * ** 289P72 10/03/89 * * * * ** 27.20 289P78 10/10/89 * * * * ** * 289P94 10/09/89 POMMER CO. INC. NAME PLATES 289Q20 10/05/89 * * * * ** 110.78 289R01 10/05/89 289R01 10/10/89 * * * * ** 78.00 289R12 10/09/89 289R12 10/03/89 289R13 10/05/89 * * * * ** ADVERTISNIG 10 -16 -89 PAGE 27 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 30- 4600 - 781 -78 5601 3899 * ** -CKS j 40- 4540 - 807 -80 7308 3201 * ** -CKS 28- 4504 - 702 -70 678445 * ** -CKS i 10- 4504 - 510 -51 18862 I * ** -CKS 40- 4504 - 802 -80 90830 9783 j I * ** -CKS i 28- 4274 - 704 -70 42443 * ** -CKS 30- 4214 - 781 -78 1271 4025 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 33087 3563 * ** -CKS 28- 4248 - 704 -70 11148 3608 28- 4248 - 704 -70 11165 3873 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 5094 3671 26- 4540- 682 -68 0867 3378 10- 4226 - 440 -44 14968 * ** -CKS CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 49.70 PIP PRINTING PRINTING 49.70 * 447.00 PLANT & FLANGED EQU REPAIR PARTS 447.00 * 27.20 PLUNKETTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 27.20 * 85.64 POMMER CO. INC. NAME PLATES 85.64 * 110.78 POWER SUPPLY CO. GUAGES 110.78 * 78.00 PRINTERS SERV INC BLADE SHARPENEING 78.00 * 45.00 PUBLICITY CENTRAL ADVERTISNIG 45.00 * 84.54 QUICK SERV BATTERY FILTERS 84.54 * 168.80 R & R SPECIALTIES REPAIR ZAMBONI 104.00 R & R SPECIALTIES REPAIR ZAMBONI 272.80 * 15.82 RADIO SHACK DUPLEX JACK 24.94 RADIO SHACK MIKE 40.76 * 132.00 RADIO INSTALLS RADIO RENTAL 132.00 * 10 -16 -89 PAGE 27 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 30- 4600 - 781 -78 5601 3899 * ** -CKS j 40- 4540 - 807 -80 7308 3201 * ** -CKS 28- 4504 - 702 -70 678445 * ** -CKS i 10- 4504 - 510 -51 18862 I * ** -CKS 40- 4504 - 802 -80 90830 9783 j I * ** -CKS i 28- 4274 - 704 -70 42443 * ** -CKS 30- 4214 - 781 -78 1271 4025 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 33087 3563 * ** -CKS 28- 4248 - 704 -70 11148 3608 28- 4248 - 704 -70 11165 3873 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 5094 3671 26- 4540- 682 -68 0867 3378 10- 4226 - 440 -44 14968 * ** -CKS R CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION RENTAL EQUIP & SALES REPAIR CHAIN SAW RENTAL EQUIP & SALES REPAIRS RENTAL EQUIP & SALES 1989 CITY OF EDINA ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. BEER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT REX DISTR. 289R25 10/09/89 199.50 CO 289R25 10/09/89 170.05 SIGNAL PARTS 289R25 10/09/89 196.00 ROAD RESCUE OXYGEN BAG 565.55 k k k k k k ROAD RESCUE PARTS 289R33 10/09/89 4,401.95 289R33 10/09/89 5,980.15 289R33 10/09/89 3,585.82 50- 4630 - 862 -86 13,967.92 kkkk *k 289R35 10/05/89 31.85 31.85 * k k•k k k 289R37 10/03/89 437.40 30- 4504 - 782 -78 289R37 10/03/89 155.70 593.10 * ** —CKS k k k k k k 10- 4504 - 330 -30 890836 3268 289R49 10/05/89 190.00 890837 289R49 10/05/89 78.06 75.99 - 289R49 10/05/89 10814 � 3 289R49 10/09/89 . 111.23 10- 4620 - 560 -56 487.43* 3211 10- 4620 - 560 -56 90113 289R63 10/03/89 334.00 10- 4620 - 560 -56 80345 3258 334.00 k k k k k k 289R79 10/09/89 618.75 * ** —CKS 10- 4201 - 646 -64 618.75 3673 *kkkkk 289R81 10/09/89 70.34 10- 4260 - 510 -51 70.34 k kkkkk 289515 10/10/89 66.97 * ** —CKS 66.97 146945 k k k k k 1 289S19 10/09/89 568.96 R CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION RENTAL EQUIP & SALES REPAIR CHAIN SAW RENTAL EQUIP & SALES REPAIRS RENTAL EQUIP & SALES REPAIR PARTS REX DISTR. ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. BEER REX DISTR. BEER REX DISTR. 3719 BEER RICHFIELD PLUMB CO GENERAL SUPPLIES RIDDLE CONTROL PROD. SIGNAL PARTS RIDDLE CONTROL PROD. SIGNAL PARTS ROAD RESCUE OXYGEN BAG ROAD RESCUE TUBE SET ROAD RESCUE PARTS ROAD RESCUE SIREN PARTS ROGERS PAINTING PAINTING RTW INC. INSURANCE RUBENSTEIN & ZIFF COST /GOODS SOLD SEARS REPAIR BATTERY SEELYE PLASTICS REPAIR PARTS 10 -16 -89 PAGE 28 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4248 - 644 -64 10576 3719 10- 4248 - 644 -64 10559 10- 4540 - 520 -52 10337 3936 * ** —CKS 50- 4630 - 822 -82 50- 4630 - 842 -84 50- 4630 - 862 -86 4ts k k k —CKS 30- 4504 - 782 -78 0385 3430 * ** —CKS 10- 4504 - 330 -30 890836 3268 10- 4504 - 330 -30 890837 3290 * ** —CKS 10- 4510 - 440 -44 090171 3840 10- 4620 - 560 -56 90016 3211 10- 4620 - 560 -56 90113 10- 4620 - 560 -56 80345 3258 * ** —CKS 10- 4201 - 646 -64 3673 * ** —CKS 10- 4260 - 510 -51 r * ** —CKS 23- 4624 - 613 -61 146945 3865 1 * * * — CKS'� 28- 4248 - 704 -70 3636 * ** —CKS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 153263 3728 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION SHERWIN WILLIAMS SOUTHDALE FORD SOUTHDALE FORD SOUTHDALE FORD SOUTHDALE FORD SOUTHDALE FORD SOUTHERN VACUUM SOUTHERN VACUUM SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO ST. PAUL BOOK ST. PAUL BOOK JOHN SHEPARD STATE TREASURER STATE TREASURER STRGAR - ROSCOE -FAUSH SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET GENERAL SUPPLIES PARTS HOSE CABLE GASKETS GASKETS NEW VACUUM FLOOR MAINT BEER BEER OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE SERVICES PERMITS PERMITS PRO SERV ENG PAINT EXT CAB SERVICE REPAIR WORK REPAIR WORK REPAIR WORK GEAR ANTENNA 10 -16 -89 PAGE 29 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 4504- 325 -30 06817 3345 10- 4540 - 560 -56 218895 10- 4540 - 560 -56 218125 10- 4540- 560 -56 218252 10- 4540 - 560 -56 219363 10- 4540 - 560 -56 218226 50- 4236 - 821 -82 50 -4262- 821 -82 50- 4630 - 822 -82 50- 4630 - 842 -84 10- 4516 - 600 -60 959422 3800 23- 4516 - 611 -61 959451 3630 10- 4100 - 430 -42 10- 3095 - 000 -00 10- 3113 - 000 -00 10- 4201 - 260 -26 10- 4248 - 560 -56 6053 10- 4248 - 560 -56 6049 10- 4248 - 560 -56 89295 10- 4248 - 560 -56 89376 10- 4248 - 560 -56 90215 10- 4540 - 560 -56 114507 10- 4540 - 560 -56 114150 * ** -CKS .j * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 568.96 kkkkkk 289S27 10/05/89 113.49 i2e.se 113.49* '28-98' kkkkkk 289S34 10/09/89 11.65 289S34 10/03/89 24.44 289S34 10/03/89 30.54 289S34 10/09/89 2.98 289534 10/03/89 18.12 87.73 289S35 10/05/89 165.00 289S35 10/05/89 36.95 201.95 289S36 10/09/89 3,063.10 289S36 10/09/89 8,049.90 11,113.00 kkkkkk 289S45 10/03/89 16.66 289S45 10/03/89 54.82 71.48 k k k k k k 289550 10/03/89 100.00 100.00 kkkkkk . 289S61 10/05/89 2,430.85 289S61 10/05/89 136.00 2,566.85 kkkkkk 289S73 10/09/89 372.11 372.11 kkkkkk 289S77 10/03/89 350.00 289S77 10/03/89 429.60 4�29..to 289S77 10/03/89 132.00 289S77 10/03/89 31.50 289S77 10/03/89 100.00 289S77 10/09/89 8.86 289S77 10/03/89 6.97 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION SHERWIN WILLIAMS SOUTHDALE FORD SOUTHDALE FORD SOUTHDALE FORD SOUTHDALE FORD SOUTHDALE FORD SOUTHERN VACUUM SOUTHERN VACUUM SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO ST. PAUL BOOK ST. PAUL BOOK JOHN SHEPARD STATE TREASURER STATE TREASURER STRGAR - ROSCOE -FAUSH SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET GENERAL SUPPLIES PARTS HOSE CABLE GASKETS GASKETS NEW VACUUM FLOOR MAINT BEER BEER OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE SERVICES PERMITS PERMITS PRO SERV ENG PAINT EXT CAB SERVICE REPAIR WORK REPAIR WORK REPAIR WORK GEAR ANTENNA 10 -16 -89 PAGE 29 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 4504- 325 -30 06817 3345 10- 4540 - 560 -56 218895 10- 4540 - 560 -56 218125 10- 4540- 560 -56 218252 10- 4540 - 560 -56 219363 10- 4540 - 560 -56 218226 50- 4236 - 821 -82 50 -4262- 821 -82 50- 4630 - 822 -82 50- 4630 - 842 -84 10- 4516 - 600 -60 959422 3800 23- 4516 - 611 -61 959451 3630 10- 4100 - 430 -42 10- 3095 - 000 -00 10- 3113 - 000 -00 10- 4201 - 260 -26 10- 4248 - 560 -56 6053 10- 4248 - 560 -56 6049 10- 4248 - 560 -56 89295 10- 4248 - 560 -56 89376 10- 4248 - 560 -56 90215 10- 4540 - 560 -56 114507 10- 4540 - 560 -56 114150 * ** -CKS .j * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA GEAR CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 289S77 10/09/89 4.43 289S77 10/03/89 20.25 SUP IRRIGATION PARTS t nee t * 1,083.61* r°°° .w'_" 289S78 10/05/89 7.57 289S78 10/05/89 155.16 289S78 10/09/89 294.20 289S78 10/05/89 33.99 - 289S78 10/09/89 29.41 289S78 10/09/89 196.90 289S78 10/05/89 123.16 289S78 10/05/89 73.67 846.08 * * * * ** 289592 10/03/89 189.85 289S92 10/10/89 71.42 289S92 10/09/89 118.03 379.30 * * * * ** 289S96 10/09/89 80.00 289S96 10/09/89 8.00 289596 10/05/89 80.00 289S96 10/09/89 8.00 - 289S96 10/09/89 80.00 289596 10/09/89 80.00 - 160.00 * 289S97 10/03/89 212.33 212.33 * * * * * ** 289T11 10/05/89 130.00 289T11 10/05/89 62.25 192.25 * * * * * ** 289T14 10/05/89 349.44 349.44 * * * * * ** 289T16 10/03/89 271.99 271.99 * * * * * ** 289T20 10/05/89 36.50 36.50 * * * * * ** CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION SUBURBAN CHEVROLET GEAR SUBURBAN CHEVROLET HANDLE SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP IRRIGATION PARTS SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP IRRIGATION PARTS SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP REPAIR PARTS SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP CREDIT SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP REPAIR PARTS SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP REPAIR PARTS SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP REPAIR PARTS SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP TORCH PARTS SYSTEM SUPPLY COMPUTER SUPPLIES SYSTEM SUPPLY PAPER SUPP PD SYSTEM SUPPLY COMPUTER SUPPLIES AMY SMITH CLEANING AMY SMITH CLEANING AMY SMITH CLEANING AMY SMITH CLEANING AMY SMITH CLEANINFF AMY SMITH CLEANINFF SEH PRO SERV ENG TESSMAN SEED & CHEM. SEED TESSMAN SEED & CHEM. CHEMICALS TEXGAS CORP. PROPANE TIERNEY BROS INC SUPPLIES . 10 -16 -89 PAGE 30 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 114509 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10- 4504 - 520 -52 10- 4540- 520 -52 10- 4540 - 520 -52 10- 4540 - 540 -54 10- 4540- 646 -64 23- 4540 - 611 -61 40- 4540 - 801 -80 40- 4540 - 803 -80 3794 3742 3649 3649 3492 3592 10- 4504 - 510 -51 090823 3792 10- 4504 - 510 -51 100335 4028 10- 4504 - 510 -51 100212 3952 27- 4201 - 662 -66 27- 4201- 662 -66 27- 4201 - 662 -66 3062 27- 4201 - 662 -66 27- 4201- 662 -66 27- 4201 - 662 -66 40- 4201 - 800 -80 5322 10- 4504- 301 -30 34265 3564 30- 4564- 783 -78 35611 3898 10- 4504 - 314 -30 875221 3519 10- 4504 - 510 -51 38526 THE PRINT SHOP FLYER SR CENTER 10- 4600 - 628 -62 11231 3415 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** =CKS * ** -CKS CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION THOMSEN - NYBECK LEGAL THOMSEN - NYBECK LEGAL THORPE DISTR. BEER TOLL COMPANY TOLL COMPANY TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT GENERAL SUPPLIES SUPPLIES CRAFT SUPPLIES CRAFT SUPPLIES TWIN CITY ELEVATOR SERVICES UNDERGROUND PIERCING UNDERGROUND PIERCING UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNITED ELECTRIC CORP UNITED ELECTRIC CORP UNITED ELECTRIC CORP UNITED ELECTRIC CORP UNITED ELECTRIC CORP UNIVERSITY OF MN US WEST PAGING ,40 SPRINKLER SYSTEM SPRINKLER SYSTEM UNIFORM ALLOWANCE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE UNIFORM ALLWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES I 10 -16 -89 PAGE 31 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4201 - 220 -22 10- 4201 - 220 -22 50- 4630 - 862 -86 10- 4504 - 646 -64 32411 3827 10- 4610 - 560 -56 241167 3582 23- 4588 - 611 -61 347965 3626 23- 4588- 611 -61 349107 3781 10- 4248 - 520 -52 12445 10- 4201 - 500 -50 6302 3657 10- 4201 - 500 -50 7461 3657 10- 4266- 420 -42 10- 4266- 420 -42 10- 4266 - 430 -42 10- 4266 - 430 -42 10- 4504 - 420 -42 10- 4504 - 420 -42 CABLE 10- 4540 - 520 -52 44281 3442 r 10- 4540 - 520 -52 3436 1989 CITY OF EDINA 3733 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 289T29 10/10/89 4,002.50 289T29 10/10/89 11,107.25 15,109.75 * 289T30 10/09/89 9,137.60 9,137.60 * * * * * ** 289T40 10/09/89 43.20 289T40 10/05/89 58.49 101.69 * * * * * ** 289T66 10/03/89 69.36 289T66 10/09/89 27.49 96.85 * * * * * ** 289T82 10/05/89 61.43 61.43 * * * * * ** 289U07 10/03/89 374.50 289U07 10/03/89 480.00 854.50 289U08 10/05/89 1,455.80 289U08 10/05/89 591.35 289U08 10/05/89 28.95 289U08 10/05/89 .149.25 289U08 10/05/89 380.50 289U08 10/05/89 10.50 2,616.35 * * * * ** 289U14 10/03/89 224.32 289U14 10/03/89 368.94 289U14 10/03/89 146.80 289U14 10/03/89 118.12 289U14 10/03/89 4,927.61. 5,785.79 * * * * ** 289U20 10/09/89 2,000.00 2,000.00 * * * * ** 289U30 10/05/89 40.50 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION THOMSEN - NYBECK LEGAL THOMSEN - NYBECK LEGAL THORPE DISTR. BEER TOLL COMPANY TOLL COMPANY TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT GENERAL SUPPLIES SUPPLIES CRAFT SUPPLIES CRAFT SUPPLIES TWIN CITY ELEVATOR SERVICES UNDERGROUND PIERCING UNDERGROUND PIERCING UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNITED ELECTRIC CORP UNITED ELECTRIC CORP UNITED ELECTRIC CORP UNITED ELECTRIC CORP UNITED ELECTRIC CORP UNIVERSITY OF MN US WEST PAGING ,40 SPRINKLER SYSTEM SPRINKLER SYSTEM UNIFORM ALLOWANCE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE UNIFORM ALLWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES I 10 -16 -89 PAGE 31 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4201 - 220 -22 10- 4201 - 220 -22 50- 4630 - 862 -86 10- 4504 - 646 -64 32411 3827 10- 4610 - 560 -56 241167 3582 23- 4588 - 611 -61 347965 3626 23- 4588- 611 -61 349107 3781 10- 4248 - 520 -52 12445 10- 4201 - 500 -50 6302 3657 10- 4201 - 500 -50 7461 3657 10- 4266- 420 -42 10- 4266- 420 -42 10- 4266 - 430 -42 10- 4266 - 430 -42 10- 4504 - 420 -42 10- 4504 - 420 -42 CABLE 10- 4540 - 520 -52 44281 3442 ELEC WIRE 10- 4540 - 520 -52 3436 FUSE 10- 4540 - 646 -64 3733 WIRE 40- 4504 - 807 -80 3598 STARTER 40- 4540 - 801 -80 42596 2080 GOOSE CONTROL 27- 4201 - 664 -66 SERVICE CONTRACT 30- 4288 - 781178 3897 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -16 -89 PAGE 32 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 40.50 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 289V15 10/10/89 410.35 VAN PAPER CO. SUPPLIES 10- 4514 - 520 -52 3902\ 289V15 10/05/89 1,274.80 VAN PAPER CO. BAGS 50- 4514 - 822 -82 277213 3760 289V15 10/05/89 2,358.10 VAN PAPER CO. BAGS 50- 4514 - 842 -84 277215 3760 289V15 10/05/89 1,263.20 VAN PAPER CO. BAGS 50- 4514 - 862 -86 277216 3760 5,306.45 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 289V30 10/09/89 102.00 VANTAGE ELECTRIC ELECT REPAIR 27- 4248 - 666 -66 010824 3953 102.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 289V43 10/03/89 516.00 VERSATILE VEHICLE RENTAL /GOLF CARS 27- 4276 - 665 -66 3786 3711 289V43 10/09/89 217.79 VERSATILE VEHICLE GOLF CART PARTS 27- 4540 - 665 -66 5913 3386 - 733.79 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 289V46 10/05/89 347.00 VESSCO FLUORIDE PUMP 40- 4504 - 801 -80 6767 3642 347.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS I 289V80 10/03/89 247.55 VOSS ELECTRIC SUP LAMPS 10- 4504 - 540 -54 255261 3263 289V80 10/63/89 350.40 VOSS ELECTRIC SUP LAMPS 10- 4540 - 330 -30 255374 3280 289V80 10/03/89 217.08 VOSS ELECTRIC SUP LAMPS 10- 4540 - 330 -30 255501 3295 289V80 10/03/89 92.16 VOSS ELECTRIC SUP LAMPS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 255463 3264 289V80 10/03/89 53.88 VOSS ELECTRIC SUP LAMPS 10- 4540- 646 -64 256287 3587 961.07 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 289W08 10/03/89 177.61 W.W. GRAINGER METER 10- 4540 - 520 -52 3356 289W08 10/09/89 80.03 W.W. GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 3192 289W08 10/03/89 161.10 W.W. GRAINGER METER 10- 4540 - 540 -54 3585 289W08 10/03/89 153.86 W.W. GRAINGER MOTOR 40- 4540 - 802 -80 3433 572.60 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 289W15 10/03/89 100.00 WALTER JOHNSON POLICE SERVICES 10- 4100 - 430 -42 100.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 289W28 10/03/89 30.26 WATER PRODUCTS PVC CAP 40- 4540- 802 -80 2579 3650 30.26 * ** -CKS 289W44 10/09/89 120.85 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. WHEEL MASSNY 10- 4504 - 301 -30 80305 3725 r 240,253.94 246658- FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 6,211.00 FUND 11 TOTAL. C.D.B.G. 11,232.03 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER 153.40 FUND 25 TOTAL CAPITAL FUND 102.76 FUND 26 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER FUND 27 10 -16 -89 PAGE 33 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 300.62 120.85 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND * * * * ** FUND 30 TOTAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 20,304.17 * ** -CKS 289W66 10/03/89 7.49 WILLIAMS STEEL ROPE CLIP 10- 4620 - 560 -56 FUND 41 TOTAL 7.49 * 113,424.97 FUND 50 * * * * ** LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 809,593.06 FUND 60 * ** -CKS 289W92. 10/03/89 100.00 WROBLESKI -HENRY POLICE SERVICE 10- 4100 - 430 -42 100.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 289Z14 10/09/89 12.15 ZIEGLER INC BOLT 10- 4540 - 560 -56 3718 12.15 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 240,253.94 246658- FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 6,211.00 FUND 11 TOTAL. C.D.B.G. 11,232.03 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER 153.40 FUND 25 TOTAL CAPITAL FUND 102.76 FUND 26 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUND 20,132.95 FUND 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND 7,005.49 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND 300.62 FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND 9,464.48 FUND 30 TOTAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 20,304.17 '^8 . FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND 2,084.62 FUND 41 TOTAL STORM SEWER UTILITY 113,424.97 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 809,593.06 FUND 60 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 1,240,263.49* TOTAL vo