Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-11-06_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 6, 1989 7:00 P.N. ROLLCALL I. APPROVAL OF JOINT HRA /COUNCIL MINUTES OF OCTOBER 16, 1989 II. AMENDMENT OF CONTRACT FOR DEED AND AMENDMENT TO REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - CENTENNIAL I AKES_. III. CONVEYANCE OF PHASE IV CENTENNIAL LAKES CONDOMINIUMS IV. AWARD OF BID - DECK WATERPROOFING PHASES II & III CENTENNIAL LAKES CONDOMINIUMS V. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL PROCLAMATION American Education Week EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION - Jim Knutson and Bob Kojetin I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Council members or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. * II. APPROVAL OF MIN=S of the Joint HRA /Council Meeting and Regular Meeting of October 16, 1989 , * III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. "Lot Division 1. 4700 and 4704 Merilane (Not subject to moratorium) B. Second Reading 1. Ordinance No. 804 - Regulating Plats and Subdivisions 2. Ordinance No. 825 -A30 - Requiring Larger Minimum Lot Areas and Dimensions for Certain Lots in the R -1 District 3. Ordinance No. 825 -A32 - To Allow Private Clubs in the PC -1 Commercial District C. First Reading - Ordinance No. 825 -A33 - To Require Increased Sideyard Setbacks for Certain Lots in the R -1 District IV. PUBLIC HEARING ON STREET VACATION Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Vacation of Old County Road Right of Way - Leo Evans Property - Generally located east of Vernon Avenue and east of Olinger Road V. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS Agenda Edina City Council November 6, 1989 Page 2 VI. AWARD OF BIDS * A. Collection of Garbage/Refuse - City Properties (Continue to 11/20/89) * B. Van Valkenburg Park Lighting * C. Fence Replacement - Braemar Driving Range * D. Golf Carts * E. Dry Electrostatic Transfer Copier * F. Refrigeration - Grandviev Liquor Store VII. PUBLIC HEARING - BEER LICENSE FEES VIII. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Recycling - Program Update B. Storefront/Youth Action - Hennepin County Funding C. SHHSC - Hennepin County Funding D. Set Date - Special Meeting with Heritage Preservation Board Regarding St. Patrick Church Site E. Council Party - Edinamite F. Southdale Request /Funding for Police Officer * G. Community Health Services Subsidy Agreement - Hennepin County IX. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS A. Letter Regarding Blake Road - James B. Hovland * B. Petition for Ornamental Street Lights - Eden Prairie Road * C. Petition for Ornamental Street Lights - Delaney Boulevard fD. Letter Regarding,Deer - Kay and Ron Bach X. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES A. RTB Certificate of Appreciation - Mayor Richards B. Edina Joint Public Relations Effort - School District /Chamber of Commerce XI. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL XII. POSTAGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS A. 1990 LMC Proposed City Policies and Priorities XIII. FINANCE A. Award of Bid - Refunding Bonds - Resolution Relating to $12,970,000 G.O. Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1989; Authorizing Issuance, Awarding Sale, Fixing Form and Detail, Providing for Execution and Delivery Thereof and Security Therefor * B. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 11/6/89, Total $534,691.63; and confirmation of,payment of claims dated 9/30/89, Total $984,419.87 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Fri Nov 10 VETERANS DAY - City Hall Closed Sat Nov 18 Edina Foundation Benefit (Dynamite Jazz '89) 6:30 p.m. Edinborough Park Mon Nov 20 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Thurs Nov 23) ) THANKSGIVING DAY - City Hall Closed Fri Nov 24) Mon Dec 4 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Mon Dec 18 Joint Council /Park Board Meeting 6:00 p.m. Mgrs Conf Rm Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Mon Dec 25 CHRISTMAS DAY - City Hall Closed MINUTES OF THE JOINT MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY /CITY COUNCIL HELD AT EDINA CITY HALL OCTOBER 16,1989 A joint meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the City Council was convened to consider concurrently: 1) Edinborough - Hawthorn Hotel Development, 2) 50th and France Improvements, and 3)'Acceptance of Outlot A - Village Homes of Centennial Lakes. Action was taken by the HRA and Council as recorded. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners /Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Richards. MINUTES of the HRA of October 2, 1989 were approved as submitted by motion of Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Rice. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON EDINBOROUGH/HAQTHORN HOTEL DEVELOPMENT: AMENDMENT TO FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVED: ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 825 -A31 ADOPTED (TO ALLOW HOTELS AS PRINCIPAL USE IN MDD DISTRICT): AMENDMENT TO REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT/EDINBOROUGH APPROVED Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Craig Larsen presented the proposal of Hawthorn Suites Hotel to construct an extended stay hotel at Edinborough. The site is located in the southwest quadrant of the Edinborough development and is vacant land approximately 3.5 acres in area. The approved development plan calls for an eight story, 160,000 square foot office building. The proposal calls for amending the final development plan to allow a seven story, 142 unit hotel. The plans now under consideration are the same as those presented in May, 1989 when the matter was continued indefinitely. Additional action required would be amendment of the Zoning Ordinance to permit suites hotels in the Mixed Development District. The proposed hotel would contain 136 two -room suites and 8 handicapped units. Units range from 408 to approximately 500 square feet. The building is approximately 65 feet in height and has a gross area of 90,000 square feet. This compares to the office building previously approved for the site of 160,000 square feet and 104 feet in height. The site plan illustrates 186 parking spaces; 157 spaces would be required for a hotel. It is proposed that 86 of those spaces would be reserved for park users. The plan also illustrates a 36 -foot setback from the westerly property. The Mixed Development District has a 50 -foot setback minimum; therefore a 14 foot setback variance is requested. This is an improvement over the approved plan that showed the taller office building with a setback of 27 feet from the westerly property line. Proposed signage for the site includes signage on the westerly and southerly walls, with free standing signs at the southerly entry at Minnesota Drive and the main entrance at Minnesota Drive and Edinborough Way. Planner Larsen concluded the presentation by noting that the signage package does comply with the requirements suggested in the amendment to the sign ordinance which will deal with both Edinborough and Centennial Lakes. HRA Executive Director Gordon Hughes stated that the hotel proposal is part of the Edinborough project and as such an amendment to the redevelopment contract for Edinborough is required. The proposed purchase price of the property remains unchanged at $1,127,903. This price includes reimbursements to the HRA, park dedication fees and special assessments, and also provides at completion of the hotel a $50,000 contribution to the City. The City would receive a non - exclusive easement over 86 parking spaces in the hotel lot. The hotel would be responsible for the ongoing maintenance and upkeep of all parking spaces. As to the parking ramp, staff would propose that the HRA withdraw the requirement that the HRA be given a reservation to construct a future parking ramp on the hotel site. Staff believes that the non - exclusive parking easement would satisfy present and future parking needs. A monthly park maintenance fee of $15 /room would be paid to the City. This fee would be increased annually by the lesser of the consumer price index or the percentage increase in the hotel's gross room revenues. The HRA would agree that if the City ever levied a special tax on hotel rooms, the annual increase in park maintenance fees would cease and the monthly fee would return to $15 /room. Hawthorn Suites Hotel is prepared to submit a payment and performance bond which would guarantee that the hotel will, in fact, be constructed. In exchange, they request that the HRA-'s rights of reversion and rights to re- purchase the property be eliminated from the agreement. Staff would propose that the HRA undertake several improvements in connection with the project: 1) Tramway service drive located partly on park property on the north side of the hotel, and 2) Sidewalk that would cross the hotel lot to Edinborough Park. Both improvements were proposed to be constructed by the HRA last spring. Also proposed is that the HRA contribute $2,000 per stall for the 29 stalls that are over and above Zoning Ordinance requirements. Director Hughes concluded by stating, that the following actions would be required if the HRA /Council wished to proceed with the project: 1) Amendment to the Final Development Plan (Council) 2) Amendment to the Zoning Ordnance to allow hotels as a principal use in the Mixed Development District (Council) 3) Amendment to the Redevelopment Agreement for Edinborough and execution of related documents (HRA) 4) Amendment of the Sign Ordinance to address commercial building signage in the Mixed Development District (Council) Commissioner /Member Smith asked if the covenant to maintain the parking lot would run with the land. Attorney Erickson affirmed that the covenant for maintenance of all parking spaces would run with the land. Commissioner /Member Smith then asked if the purchase price of $1,127,903 would be net of the HRA parking contribution. Director Hughes explained that the HRA would be reimbursing the hotel for the 29 parking spaces out of the purchase price. Commissioner /Member Rice asked if the monthly $15 /room park maintenance fee is equivalent to what other Edinborough entities pay. Director Hughes said that the condominium units and the rental apartment units pay $15 /month per unit. Commissioner /Member Rice asked if hotel guests could use the park facilities. Director Hughes explained that the room park maintenance fee would entitle hotel guests to use the pool and track at no extra charge. Chairman /Mayor Richards asked if the hotel would have to pay the monthly $15 /room fee regardless of occupancy rates. Director Hughes said that occupancy would have no bearing on the fee. Chairman /Mayor Richards then asked for comments by representatives of Hawthorn Suite Hotel. No comments were heard. Chairman /Mayor Richards noted that letters objecting to the project were on file from the following: Susan Britzius, 7606 York Avenue #7109; Margaret Graff, 7622 York Avenue #1209; Theresa McCormick, 7635 Edinborough Way #5302; G. Phillips, 7350 York Avenue; Bernie and Jim Prokop, 7631 Edinborough Way #5111; and Catherine Hoffman, 7609 Edinborough Way #4118. A letter in support of the project was received from Leonard Neuman, 7605 Edinborough Way. Public comment was heard as follows: Joyce Claybourn, 7615. Edinborough Way #4110, spoke in favor of the hotel proposal and said many other Edinborough residents are for the project. Tom Niederer, 7606 York Avenue #7205, stated that a lot of the Edinborough as well as community residents are concerned about a hotel being adjacent to Edinborough Park. He said his concerns would be overcrowding, lack of concern by the hotel transients for the park facilities, and inconsistency of hotel with the overall Edinborough and Centennial Lakes developments. Member Rice introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR EDINBOROUGH - HAWTHORN SUITES HOTEL BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the Final Development Plan for Edinborough - Hawthorn Suites Hotel, presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of October 16, 1989, be and is hereby approved. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. Member Smith introduced Ordinance No. 825 -A31 as follows and moved adoption, with waiver of Second Reading: ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A31 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825) TO ADD SUITES HOTEL TO MIXED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND TO ADD A DEFINITION OF SUITES HOTELS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 14.B. of Ordinance No. 825 is hereby amended by adding the following principal use: "8. Suites Hotels" Sec. 2. Section 3.D. of Ordinance No. 825 is hereby amended by adding the following definition: "Suites Hotel: A hotel in which at least eighty percent (80 %) of the guest rooms are two -room suites containing at least 400 square feet of gross floor area." Sec. 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Ordinance adopted. Commissioner Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN; RATIFYING AND AFFIRMING THE EXECUTION OF VARIOUS AGREEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF VARIOUS OTHER DOCUMENTS BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), as follows: 1. Recitals. The HRA and the Edina City Council have previously approved a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.002, subdivision 16, designated as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan "). Acting pursuant to the Plan the HRA entered into a Land Sale Agreement and Contract for Private Redevelopment (the "Contract ") with the East Edina Housing Foundation (the "Foundation ") dated on or as of August 1, 1985. The Contract was subsequently amended by Amendment No. 1 dated as of October 1, 1985, by Amendment No. 2 dated as of April 1, 1986, by Amendment No. 3 dated as of July 10, 1986, by Amendment No. 4 dated as of October 6, 1986, by Amendment No. 5 dated as of February 19, 1987 and by Amendment No. 6 dated as of March 31, 1989 (together herein called the "Prior Amendments "). It is now proposed that the Contract be further amended by the Hotel Redevelopment Agreement dated as of May 15, 1989 (the "Current Amendment ") and the Current Amendment has been presented to and reviewed by the HRA. 2. Ratification. Execution and Delivery. The execution and delivery of the Contract and Prior Amendments by the officers executing the same on behalf of the HRA is hereby ratified and affirmed. 3. Authorization for Execution and Delivery of Further Documents. The form of the Current Amendment is hereby approved subject to such modifications as are deemed appropriate and approved by the attorney for the HRA and the Executive Director of the HRA, which approval shall be conclusively evidenced by the execution of the Current Amendment by any two officers of the HRA. Any two officers of the HRA are directed to execute and deliver the Current Amendment as it may be so modified. Any two officers of the HRA are also authorized and directed-to execute and deliver such other instruments, and take such other action, as may be required to accomplish the transactions contemplated herein and by the Current Amendment, including but not limited to any amendments or supplements to the Contract, as amended, and other agreements, as may be necessary to accomplish the transactions contemplated by the Current Amendment. The execution of any such amendments, supplements or agreements by any two officers of the HRA shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents by the HRA in accordance with this Resolution. Dated this 16th day of October, 1989. ATTEST: Chairman Executive Director Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Commissioner Kelly. Commissioner Smith recalled that at the presentation in April there was some concern regarding hotel trash hauling impacting the residential area. Director Hughes recalled that the discussion had to do with the orientation of the hotel's service drive. He said the trash would be stored indoors and that the landscaping plans include generous landscaping along the service drive area and along the commuter strip. Kevin Poorman, representing Hawthorn Suites Hotel, said it was his understanding that the service area would be bermed and screened by a wall. Commissioner Paulus asked if the building would have provisions for recycling in the future. Director Hughes said the State Uniform Building Code now requires that in all commercial buildings an adequate area be set aside that could accommodate recycling. Chairman Richards then called for vote on the resolution. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. UPDATE GIVEN ON 50TH AND FRANCE BUSINESS DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS .Engineer Fran Hoffman recalled that the HRA had directed the staff and the 50th and France Business Association to reach a consensus on what material to use to replace the brick pavers. The Association's Board of Directors has submitted a letter dated October 13, 1989 stating that they are unanimously in favor of red exposed aggregate like that being used for the Southdale renovation. Engineer Hoffman said staff would propose that sample panels of red exposed aggregate be installed this fall behind the theatre for final review of the 50th and France merchants and tenants. A final survey would then be sent to everyone saying that this type of finish would be used unless they would prefer the concrete paver brick which staff'has recommended. W ' 1 Regarding timetable for the project, Engineer Hoffman said following the survey staff would prepare contract documents for a winter bid letting followed by start of construction in early spring. He said no action is required at this time. CONVEYANCE OF OUTLOT A. VILLAGE HOMES OF CENTENNIAL LAKES, APPROVED Director Hughes explained that the subject outlot is an extremely small parcel located in the southwestern corner of the Centennial Lakes condominiums plat. This outlot is the only portion of the entire plat that is registered property. According to the Examiner of Titles, if any portion of a plat is registered, then the entire plat must likewise be registered. In that this outlot adjoins W. 76th Street, as well as Centennial Lakes Park, the condominium developer has asked that it be transferred to the HRA in order to avoid the title registration action on the balance of the property. Staff would recommend acceptance of Outlot A. Commissioner Rice introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:. RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, that it hereby accepts conveyance of Outlot A, Village Homes of Centennial Lakes, as platted and of record with the Register of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Commissioner Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. Motion was made by Commissioner Kelly and was seconded by Commissioner Rice for adjournment of the BRA. Motion carried unanimously. Executive Director City Clerk �ZN A �1 o e'a `" .�0 REPORT /RECOIV MENDATION JaeB To: HRA Agenda item # HI II BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS From: TOM ERICKSON Consent ❑ - Information Only ❑ Date: NOVEMBER 6, 1989 Mgr. Recommends 0 To HRA Subject: SECOND AMENDMENT TO ❑ To Council HEDBERG CONTRACT FOR DEED; THIRD AMENDMENT Action ❑ Motion TO HRA CONTRACT 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: We recommend approval of the Second Amendment to Contract for Deed and the Amendment No. 3 (to HRA Contract), by means of the attached resolution. Info /Background: South Edina Development Corporation ( "SED "), the Centennial Lakes Development, has the option to buy land from the HRA pursuant to the Redevelopment Contracts for Centennial Lakes. To maintain that option SED must, among other requirements, make all payments to Hedberg under the Hedberg Contract for Deed. An interest payment in the amount of $801,797.22 is now due. SED will be making that payment. SED has also worked out an agreement (the attached Second Amendment to Contract for Deed) with Hedberg to allow deferral of the interest payment due October 13, 1990, also, in the amount of $801,797.22, (the "Deferred Interest "). That amount, if deferred, would be added to principal. The agreement also reduces the amount of,.interest to be paid for releases of land from interest on all unpaid principal to interest only on the principal amount paid for the release. Gordon Hughes and I have been discussing this matter with SED. We have concluded that the reduction in the interest required to be paid for any release is a benefit to the HRA and the Foundation, and that deferral of the Deferred Interest and addition thereof to the principal is not adverse to the HRA or the Foundation if SED agrees to pay any interest on other Deferred Interest while it is the holder of the option. Amendment No. 3 (to HRA Contract) also attached, provides for such payment by SED of interest on the Deferred Interest without reimbursement by the HRA. 3212g RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF VARIOUS DOCUMENTS BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), as follows: 1. Recitals. The HRA and the Edina'City Council have previously approved a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.421, subdivision 15, designated as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, and have approved various amendments thereto (as so amended, the "Redevelopment Plan "). Acting pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan, the HRA has acquired certain land in the area included in the Redevelopment Plan pursuant to a Contract for Deed dated as of October 3, 1989,' with John W. Hedberg and Kenneth M. Anderson, as personal representatives of the Estate of Fred W. Hedberg (the "Contract for Deed "), and the HRA has entered into an Amended and Restated Land Sale Agreement and Contract for Private Redevelopment between the HRA and Foundation dated as of September 30, 1988 (the "Agreement "). In connection with the transactions contemplated by the Contract for Deed and the Agreement, it is now proposed that a Second Amendment to Contract for Deed, and an Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement be executed and delivered by the HRA, both as presented to and reviewed by the Board. 2. Authorization for Execution and Delivery of Documents. Any two officers of the HRA are authorized and directed to execute said Second Amendment to Contract for Deed and said Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement with such changes and modifications as may be approved by the Executive Director and Attorney for the HRA. The execution of such instruments and agreements by any two officers of the HRA shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents by the HRA in accordance with this Resolution. Dated as of the day of November, 1989. Chairman Attest: Executive Director �f R' SECOND AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT FOR DEED THIS AMENDMENT ("Second Amendment") day of October, 1989, by John W. Hedberg as personal representative of the estate (collectively "'Seller"'); and the Housing Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a body po the State of Minnesota ("Purchaser"'). 1030891bg04 is made as of this 13th and Kenneth M. Anderson, of Fred W. Hedberg and Redevelopment Litic under the laws of WHEREAS, Seller and Purchaser entered into a certain Contract for Deed dated as of the 3rd day of October, 1988, and filed with the Hennepin County offices of the Registrar of Title and County Recorder on October 14, 1988, as Document Nos. 1966600 (torrens) and 5465055 (abstract), with respect to that certain property described on Exhibit I (the "'Property"), attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (the "'Contract for Deed"); and WHEREAS, Seller and Purchaser amended the Contract for Deed pursuant to document dated , 1989, filed with the Hennepin County offices of the Registrar of Titles and County Recorder as Document Nos. and , respectively ("First Amendment"); and WHEREAS, the parties desire to further amend said Contract for Deed. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1.0 Deferral of Second Interest Payment: 1.1 Pursuant to paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Contract for Deed, annual principal installments of $1,220,885.80 are required from 1989 through 1997. The parties acknowledge that due to prepayments of principal received by Seller on October 13, 1988, no principal installment is due on the first or second annual installment dates of October 13, 1989 and October 13, 1990, and that only $362,657.40 of principal is due on the third installment date, October 13, 1991. 1.2 The parties further acknowledge that there is due on each October 13, 1989 through 1998, interest on the entire unpaid principal balance of the Contract for Deed. The interest due October 13, 1989 is $801,797.22 ( "First Interest Installment "). Seller agrees the First Interest Installment may be paid subsequent to October 13, 1989 if actually received by Seller prior to November 8, 1989, and if so received prior to said November 8, 1989, Seller agrees to apply and treat said First Interest Installment as if paid on October 13, 1989. 1.3 But for this Second Amendment (and assuming no prepayments are made between the date hereof and then) the interest due October 13, 1990 would be $801,797.22 (the "Deferred Interest Amount"). 1.4 The parties hereby agree that the Deferred Interest Amount need not be paid on October 13,.1990 by Purchaser, but in the event said Deferred Interest Amount is not paid on or before October 13, 1990, then said amount shall be added to the unpaid principal amount of said Contract for Deed, effective as of October 14, 1990, thus (and assuming no prepayments are made between the date hereof and then) thereby increasing the unpaid principal balance from $8,908,858.00 to $9,710,655.22. 1.5 If the Deferred Interest Amount is added to principal pursuant to paragraph 1.4, above, and assuming no other prepayments or interest payments are made under the Contract for Deed, then on October 13, 1991, interest of $873,959.00 and principal of $395,296.50 shall be due and owing; and on October 13, 1992 through 1997 (assuming no prepayments are made), there shall be due and owing $1,330,765.50 in principal, plus interest on the outstanding unpaid balance (as set forth in paragraphs 4(a) and (b) of the Contract for Deed); and on October 13, 1998, the remaining unpaid principal balance of the Contract for Deed, together with all accrued interest shall become due and payable. 2.0 Release Price Adiustments: 2.1 In the event the Deferred Interest Amount is added to the unpaid principal balance under the Contract for Deed pursuant to paragraph 1.3, above, (but not until such time as the Deferred Interest Amount has been so added to the unpaid principal balance), then the following additional modification to the Contract for Deed shall be made: 2.1.1 Wherever the dollar figure of '$5.65" appears in the Contract for Deed in paragraphs 5(b), 5(g)(i), and 5(g)(viii), said dollar figure shall be changed to "$6.16." 2.2 The parties acknowledge that notwithstanding anything else contained herein to the contrary, Purchaser has paid for 408 square feet of land for which it has not yet been given a release from the Contract for Deed, which 408 square feet of land shall be included in the next partial conveyance from Seller to Purchaser pursuant to paragraph 5 of the Contract for Deed. 3.0 Elimination of Special Periods: 3.1 The parties hereby agree that the second sentence of paragraph 5(f) of the Contract for Deed which reads: -2- ,i� "The foregoing notwithstanding, during the periods from the date of this Contract for Deed to and including the 180th day after the date of this Contract for Deed, and from the first anniversary of -the date of this Contract for Deed, to and including the 180th day after such first anniversary (hereinafter the "Special Periods"'), there shall be required to be paid interest accrued to the date of conveyance on only the portion of the principal required to be prepaid in order to secure such conveyance." shall be deemed modified and amended so -as to read: The foregoing notwithstanding, during the period from and after November 8, 1989 through October 12, 1998 (hereinafter the "Special Periods"), there shall be required to be paid interest accrued to the date of conveyance on only the portion of the principal required to be prepaid in order to secure such conveyance."' If the Deferred Interest Amount °is added to the unpaid principal balance pursuant to paragraph 1.4, above, it shall be deemed to have been paid for purposes of calculating any Special Periods interest due on partial conveyances between October 14, 1990 through October 12, 1991. Effective November 8, 1989, the first sentence of paragraph 5(f) of the Contract for Deed shall be deemed deleted, it being agreed that thereafter and until the Contract for Deed becomes finally due and payable, that the "Special Periods"' provision, as modified above, shall apply. 4.0 Ratification: 4.1 Except as.is inconsistent with the terms of this Second Amendment or.the First Amendment, the Contract for Deed is hereby ratified and confirmed. THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK MIC SELLER: John W. Hedberg Kenneth M. Anderson, as personal representative of the estate of Fred W. Hedberg, decedent CONSENT OF SPOUSES Dorothy E. Hedberg, spouse of Fred W. Hedberg, decedent, and Jean M. Hedberg, wife of John W. Hedberg, hereby consent to this Second Amendment to Contract for Deed. Jean M. Hedberg, wife of John W. Hedberg STATE OF MINNESOTA.,) ).ss: COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Dorothy E. Hedberg, By: John W. Hedberg, her attorney in fact The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of October, 1989 by John W. Hedberg and Jean M. Hedberg, wife of John W. Hedberg. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss: COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of October, 1989 by Kenneth M. Anderson, personal representative of the estate of Fred W. Hedberg, decedent. Notary Public Z� STATE OF MINNESOTA ss : COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of October, 1989 by John W. Hedberg, attorney in fact for Dorothy E. Hedberg, spouse of Fred W. Hedberg, decedent. Notary Public THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK -5- PURCHASER:' Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota By: Its Chairman By: Its Secretary STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss: COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of October, 1989 by the Chairman and the Secretary of The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, on behalf of said body politic. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Maun, Hayes, Simon, Johanneson, Brehl & Odlaug (LBG) 3500 West 80th Street Suite 520 Bloomington, MN. 55431 0 -6- CONSENT The undersigned, South Edina Development Corporation, the "Redeveloper" under that certain Amended and Restated Land Sale Agreement and Contract for Private Redevelopment by and between East Edina Housing Foundation and South Edina Development Corporation, dated on or -as of September 30, 1988 ("Foundation Contract") and as referred to in that Amended and Restated Land Sale Agreement and Contract for Private Redevelopment by and between the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, and East Edina Housing Foundation, dated on or as of September 30, 1988 ("HRA Contract"'), as either of those contracts may have been amended, hereby consents to the foregoing Second Amendment to Contract for Deed. DATED as of this day of October, 1989. SOUTH EDINA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION By: Kenneth N. Stensby President By: - Boyd B. Stofer Executive Vice President STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss: COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of October, 1989 by Kenneth N. Stensby, President and Boyd B. Stofer, Execute Vice President of South Edina Development Corporation, a Minnesota corporation on behalf of said corporation. -7- Notary Public 3204g AMENDMENT NO. 3 (To HRA Contract) This Amendment, made and entered into as of this 13th day of October, 1989, between the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a body politic and corporate under the laws of Minnesota (the "HRA "), and East Edina Housing Foundation, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (the "Foundation ") and South Edina Development Corporation, a Minnesota corporation ( "SED"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the HRA and Foundation entered into an Amended And Restated Land Sale Agreement And Contract For Private Redevelopment dated on or as of September 30, 1988 (the "HRA Contract ") relating to certain land in Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, now platted as South Edina Development Addition (the "Subject Land "); and WHEREAS, the Foundation and SED entered into an Amended And Restated Land Sale Agreement And Contract For Private Redevelopment dated on or as of September 30, 1988 (the "Foundation Contract ") relating to the Subject Land; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 13.2 of the HRA Contract, the Foundation was granted an option (the "Option ") to purchase those portions of the Subject Land upon which the Private Improvements (as defined in the HRA Contract) are to be built and also to purchase the Bloomington Parcel (as defined in the HRA Contract); and WHEREAS, said Option was transferred to SED, and the rights and obligations of the Foundation under the HRA Contract were assumed by SED by, and pursuant to the provisions of, the Foundation Contract; and WHEREAS, to maintain the Option in full force and effect SED must make all payments to be made by the purchaser under that certain Contract for Deed (the "Contract For Deed ") dated as of October 3, 1988, and filed with the Hennepin County Offices of the Registrar of Titles and County Recorder on October 14, 1988, as*Document Nos. 1966600 and 5465055, respectively, as amended by First Amendment to Contract For Deed dated as of November 30, 1988, and filed with the Hennepin County Offices of the Registrar of Titles and County Recorder on , 1988, as Document Nos. and , respectively; and WHEREAS, SED now desires that the HRA enter into a Second Amendment to Contract For Deed (the "Second Amendment ") which, among other matters, would allow interest accruing for the period from and including October 14, 1989 to and including October 13, 1990 in the amount of $801,797.22 (assuming no principal payment or interest payments are made prior to October 13, 1990) to be deferred (the "Deferred Interest Amount ") and added to principal due under the Contract For Deed; and r .• WHEREAS, said deferral, if it occurs, would be of benefit to SED by reducing the amount it must pay in 1990 on the Contract For Deed, but would add obligations to the HRA if the HRA should have to pay for releases of land from the Contract for Deed or have to reimburse SED, pursuant to the provisions of the HRA Contract, for payments made on the Contract For Deed and, therefore, the HRA and SED propose to enter into this Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements below set out, the parties hereto do hereby agree, and agree to amend the HRA Contract, as follows: 1. Section 10.7 and Paragraphs 13.3(a) and 13.4(b) of the HRA Contract. The HRA, the Foundation and SED understand and agree that in each of Section 10.7 and paragraphs 13.3(a) and 13.4(b) the HRA may have to reimburse SED for payments made by SED on the Contract for Deed, as amended by the Second Amendment, which might include interest on the Deferred Interest Amount. Therefore, it is agreed that if any reimbursement payments are required to be made by the HRA pursuant to any one or more of Section 10.7 or paragraphs 13.3(a) or 13.4(b), such reimbursement shall not include, and the HRA shall not be required to reimburse SED for, any interest paid by SED on the Deferred Interest Amount. (Such interest on the Deferred Interest Amount is herein called "Interest on Interest ".) 2. Releases of Land from the Contract for Deed. The HRA, the Foundation and SED also agree that if, during the time the Option is in force, the HRA releases land from the Contract for Deed and in connection therewith pays any Interest on Interest, then such Interest on Interest shall be paid by SED to the HRA within 10 days after notice is given to SED pursuant to the Foundation Contract, and if not paid within said 10 -day period, such Interest on Interest shall bear interest at the Interest Rate, and SED shall also pay all costs and expenses incurred by the HRA in collecting all such monies, including reasonable attorneys' fees, together with interest on such costs and expenses of collection at the Interest Rate. All amounts due under this paragraph from.SED may be set off against any monies due under the HRA Contract or Foundation Contract by the HRA or Foundation to SED. 3. To determine the amount of Interest on Interest paid by SED or the HRA, and assuming that the Deferred Interest Amount is added to principal pursuant to the Second Amendment, it is agreed that from and after the date the Deferred Interest Amount is so added to principal: (a) The principal payment due October 13, 1991 in the amount of $395,296.50 pursuant to the Second Amendment shall include a repayment of the Deferred Interest Amount in the amount of $32,639.10; (b) Assuming no prepayment of principal, each annual payment of principal in the amount of $1,330,765.50 made pursuant to the Second -2- Amendment-shall include a repayment of the Deferred Interest Amount in the amount of $109,879.70; and (c) Each prepayment of principal under the Contract for Deed, as amended, shall include a repayment of the Deferred Interest Amount in an amount equal to 8.2568% of the principal amount then prepaid. 4. The HRA Contract shall be and remain in full force and effect as previously and as hereby amended. [The rest of this page intentionally left blank.] -3- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written. HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By Frederick S. Richards Its Chairman And Glenn L. Smith Its Secretary EAST EDINA HOUSING FOUNDATION By And Its Its SOUTH EDINA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION By Kenneth N. Stensby Its President And Boyd B. Stofer Its Vice President -4- STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) SS COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) On this day of , 1989, before me appeared Frederick S. Richards and Glenn L. Smith, to me personally known, who, being by me duly affirmed, did say that they are the Chairman and Secretary, respectively, of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a body politic and corporate under the laws of Minnesota, and that said instrument was signed on behalf of said municipal corporation by authority of its governing body; and that said Frederick S. Richards and Glenn L. Smith-acknowledged, respectively, the instrument to be the free act and deed of said Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota. STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) SS COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) On this day of , 1989, before me appeared and , to me personally known, who, being by me duly affirmed, did say that they are the and , respectively, of the East Edina Housing Foundation, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation, and that said instrument was signed on behalf of said Foundation by authority of its governing body; and that said and acknowledged, respectively, the instrument to be the free act and deed of said East Edina Housing Foundation. STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) SS COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) On this _ day of , 1989, before me appeared Kenneth N. Stensby and Boyd B. Stofer, to me personally known, who, being by me duly affirmed, did say that they are the President and Vice President, respectively,' of South Edina Development Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, and that said instrument was signed on behalf of said corporation by authority of its governing body; and that said Kenneth N. Stensby and Boyd B. Stofer acknowledged, respectively, the instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation. -5- RESOLUTION RATIFYING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF VARIOUS DOCUMENTS BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), as follows: 1. Recitals. The HRA and the Edina City Council have previously approved a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.421, subdivision 15, designated as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, and have approved various amendments thereto (as so amended, the "Redevelopment Plan "). Acting pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan, the HRA has acquired certain land in the area included in the Redevelopment Plan and it has been proposed that the HRA sell and transfer a portion of such land to the East Edina Housing Foundation (the "Foundation "), pursuant to a Land Sale Agreement by and between the HRA and the Foundation (the "Agreement "). By a resolution adopted March 7, 1988, the HRA approved the form of the Agreement and authorized any two officers of the HRA to execute and deliver the Agreement on behalf of the HRA with such modifications as were deemed appropriate and approved by the Chairman and the Executive Director of the HRA. Pursuant to such authorization the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the HRA executed and delivered the Agreement dated on or as of March 14, 1988. Subsequently, by resolution dated September 12, 1988, the HRA approved execution and delivery by any two officers of the HRA, on behalf of the HRA, of an Amended and Restated Land Sale Agreement and Contract for Private Redevelopment between the HRA and Foundation with such modifications as the attorney for the HRA and Executive Director of the HRA should approve (the "Amended Agreement "). Pursuant to such authorization the Chairman and Secretary of the HRA executed and delivered the Amended Agreement dated on or as of September 30, 1988. In connection with the transactions contemplated by the Amended Agreement, it is now proposed that Phase IV of the Condominium Development be commenced on the property described on Exhibit A hereto (the "Phase IV Condominium Property ") and that the Phase IV Condominium Property be conveyed pursuant to the Amended Agreement and on the same terms;, ` %and conditions as the Phase III Condominium Property was conveyed with such changes and modifications as may be approved by the Executive Director and the Attorney to the HRA, including those resulting from the proposed addition of an elevator and the proposed sale of units without the use of second mortgages. 2. Authorization for Execution and Delivery of Documents. Any two officers of the HRA are authorized and directed to execute such instruments and agreements as may be required or be desirable to accomplish the conveyance of the Phase IV Condominium Property pursuant to the Amended Agreement with such changes and modifications as may be approved by the Executive Director and Attorney for the HRA. The execution of such instruments and agreements by any two officers of the HRA shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents by the HRA in accordance with this Resolution. EXHIBIT A THE HOMES OF CENTENNIAL LAKES PHASE IV CONDOMINIUM LAND DESCRIPTION Lot 3, Block 1, THE HOMES OF CENTENNIAL LAKES, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. <, 1r'l�rJ/- oe�A Y � J� o • � ~�bRPON`��v ]Sao REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: HRA From: GORDON L. HUGHES ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER Date: NOVEMBER.6, 1989 Subject: CONVEYANCE OF PHASE 4 CENTENNIAL LAKES CONDOMINIUMS Recommendation: Agenda Item # HRA III - Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends 0 To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Adopt attached resolution authorizing the chairman and secretary to execute documents conveying the Phase 4 condominium lot to the condominium developer. Info /Background: Several months ago, the condominium developer, Laukka Development, presented the concept of constructing a condominium building designed for more affluent purchasers on the Phase 4 site. As you know, on October 11, 1989, we received a letter from Laukka Development stating that it will not proceed with the construction of this semi - luxury condominium building due to market response. As such, Laukka proposes to develop the Phase 4 site with-a building identical to that under construction on Phase 3. This building is proposed to contain 42 condominium units, most of which would be served by an elevator. The attached exhibit compares the unit pricing of Phases 1, 2, 3 and 4.: As with Phase 3, the average sale price of the Phase 4 condominium will be somewhat higher than Phases 1 and 2. This increase in sale price is principally due to the cost of the elevator. Due to the increase, fewer units will be affordable to moderate income purchasers. Based on our current policy of limiting second mortgages to units selling for $90,000 or less, 11 units in Phase 4 will qualify for second mortgage assistance. As with Phase 3, second mortgage funds that would normally be allocated to REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION HRA /CONVEYANCE OF PHASE 4 CENTENNIAL LAKES CONDOMINIUMS November 6, 1989 Page Two Phase 4, will instead be reallocated to other buildings in the project to assist moderate income purchasers. Staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution conveying the Phase 4 site to the condominium developer. 3212g RESOLUTION RATIFYING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF VARIOUS DOCUMENTS BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of -- Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), as follows: 1. Recitals. The HRA and the Edina City Council have previously approved a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.421, subdivision 15, designated as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, and have approved various amendments thereto (as so amended, the "Redevelopment Plan "). Acting pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan, the HRA has acquired certain land in the area included in the Redevelopment Plan and it has been proposed that the HRA sell and transfer a portion of such land to the East Edina Housing Foundation (the "Foundation "), pursuant to a Land Sale Agreement by and between the HRA and the Foundation (the "Agreement "). By a resolution adopted March 7, 1988, the HRA approved the form of the Agreement and authorized any two officers, of the HRA to execute and deliver the Agreement on behalf of the HRA with such modifications as were deemed appropriate and approved by the Chairman and the'Executive Director of the HRA. Pursuant to such authorization the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the HRA executed and delivered the Agreement dated on or as of March 14, 1988. Subsequently, by resolution dated September 12, 1988, the HRA approved execution and delivery by any two officers of the HRA, on behalf of the HRA, of an Amended and Restated Land Sale Agreement and Contract for Private Redevelopment between the HRA and Foundation with such modifications as the attorney for the HRA and Executive Director of the HRA should approve (the "Amended Agreement "). Pursuant to such authorization the Chairman and Secretary of the HRA executed and delivered the Amended Agreement dated on or as of September 30, 1988. In connection with the transactions contemplated by the Amended Agreement, it is now proposed that Phase IV of the Condominium Development be commenced on the property described on Exhibit A hereto (the "Phase IV Condominium Property ") and that the Phase IV Condominium Property be conveyed pursuant to the Amended Agreement and on the same terms and conditions as the Phase III Condominium Property was conveyed with such changes and modifications as may be approved by the Executive Director and the Attorney to the HRA, including those resulting from the proposed additional of an elevator and the proposed sale of units without the use of second mortgages. 2. Authorization for Execution and Delivery of Documents. Any two officers of the HRA are authorized and directed to execute such instruments and agreements as may be °'• ra required or be desirable to accomplish the conveyance of the Phase IV Condominium Property pursuant to the Amended Agreement with such changes and modifications as may be approved by the Executive Director and Attorney for the HRA. The execution of such instruments and agreements by any two officers of the HRA shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents by the HRA in accordance with this Resolution. Dated as of the day of November, 1989. Attest: Executive Director -2- Chairman � e EXHIBIT A THE HOMES AT CENTENNIAL LAKES PHASE IV CONDOMINIUM LAND DESCRIPTION Lot 4, Block 1, The Homes of Centennial Lakes, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. A -1 BLDG I -4 REVISED: 11 /01/8? UNIT PRICE PRICE PRICE PRICE 7 NO. TYPE - - -- - - DESCRIPTION - - - -- BLDG #1 PREFIX 1 BLDG #2 PREFIX 2 BLDG 13 PREFIX 3 BLDG #4 PREFIX 4 TOTAL lUi H -1 102 D HENLEY TILBURY 60,000 65,000 ---------- NIA ---- - - - - -- N/A ---- - - - - -- 125,000 103 A -1 ABINGDON 82,O0u 81,500 88,000 81,500 90,000 90,000 35 (1,uu(1 105 E -1 GLOUCESTER 99,500 104,000 89,500 107,500 89,500 111,400 - 342,000 .. 422,400 7 106 b -2 107 6 -2 CHELTENHAM CHELTENHAM 65,400 87,400 ,400 96,800 363,000 363,0 108 E -2 BANBURY 88,000 87,400 96,000 100,500 371,900 110 6 -1 GREENWICH /9,500 91,500 79,500 91,500 84,000 83,000 68,100 96,000 331,100 362,000 111 H -1 112 D HENLEY 62,000 65,500 NIA NIA !27,500 113 A -1 TILBURY ABINGDON 89,000 89,000 87,000 90,000 355,000 115 E -1 GLOUCESTER 64,500 102,500 86,000 104,000 89,500 101,500 89,500 111,400 .349,500 425,400, 116 B -2 111 B -2 CHELTENHAM CHELTENHAM 87,400 85,400 93,400 .96,800 363,000 118 E -2 BANBURY 68,000 87,400 96,000 100,500 - 371,90u 201 H -2 SALISBURY 79,500 931500 79,500 99,000 64,000 N/A S 88,100 331,100 . 202 D 203 A -1 TILBURY ABINGDON 64,500 881000 90,000 N /A" 90,(100 192,500 352,500 205 E -1 GLOUCESTER 81,500 991500 85,500 1031000 89,500 89,500 346,000 206 B -2 CHELTENHAM 81,500 86,,400 113,040 94,400 117,100 91,800 432,600 360,100 ' 207 B-2 208 E -3 CHELTENHAM TEWKESBURY 89,400 86,400 91,000 101,500 314,300 ., 210 6 -2 NOTTINGHAM 71,000 73,000 14,000 76,000 82,000 84,000 86,000 87,100 313,000 ; 211 H -2 SALISBURY 95,600 99,000 NIA N/A 320,!00 212 D 213 A -1 TILBURY ABINGDON 85,000 89,000 90,000 90,000 194,600 354,000 215 E -1 GLOUCESTER 76,000 102,500 .5,500 103,000 89,500 1139000 89,500 117,100 340,500 ' 216 B -2 217 B-2 CHELTENHAM CHELTENHAM 81,000 86,400 94,400 91,800 435,600 365,600 -218 E-3 TEWKESBURY 88,400 71,000 86,400 74,000 97,000 101,500 373,300 ` 302 D TILBURY 86,500 90,000 82,000 95,500 86,000 101,100s13,10U 313,000 303 A -2 304 F BIRMINGHAM STRATFORD 108,600 111,100 118,500 125,900 464,100 305 F STRATFORD 89,000 90,000 99,000 102,600 380,600 306 B -2 CHELTENHAM 89,000 90,400 901000 88,400 991000 95,400 102,600 380,600 . .� 307 B -2 CHELTENHAM 90,400 88,400 981400 98,900 103,000 373,100 380.200 308 C -1 309 C -2 GAINSBOROUGH READING 98,500 96,500 109,500 114,500 419,000 .� 312 D TILBURY 111,000 109,000 122,000 127,500 469,500 313 A -2 BIRMINGHAM 891000 111,100 89,000 111400 97,500 121,000 101,100 125,900 316,600 314 F 315 F STRATFORD 89,000 90,000 99,000 1021600 469,100 360,600 316 B -2 STRATFORD CHELTENHAM 891000 90,000 99,000 102,600 380,600 317 B -2 CHELTENHAM 89,000 90,000 881000 88,400 95,000 99,500 376,500 319 C -1 98,500 96,500 98 000 109,500 102,600 114,500 379,000 419,000 319 C -2 READING kEADIN6 GARAGES 5000 /EACH 111,000 109,000 122,000 127,500 469.,500 - - -- 30,000 15,11011 50,000 50,000 145,000 TOTAL 41099,700 4,143400 4,144,900 4,300,900 16,688,600 ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- A. ° '11' REQUEST FOR PURCHASE iaar TO: HRA FROM: GORDON L. HUGHES VIA: Kenneth Rosland; City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: NOVEMBER 6, 1989 AGENDA ITEM HRA IV ITEM DESCRIPTION:. DECK WATERPROOFING - PHASE 2 & 3 CONDOMINIUMS Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Kremer & Davis �, $ 19,505.00 2. Water Proofing, Inc. 2. 22,648.00 3. Twin City Pressure Seal, Inc. 3. 28,965.00 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Kremer & Davis $19,505.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: The proposed is for deck waterproofing over the underground parking for condominium buildings .2 & 3 at Centennial Lakes. The Recommended bid is Y Dei)artmot i VA within budget not w Kenneth Rosland, City f�. 1 1 AP WHEREAS, the citizens of our community have long recognized the historic link between education and a strong, free nation; and WHEREAS, our public schools have enabled generations of American families to build upon the lessons of the past to achieve the dreams of tomorrow; and WHEREAS, America's system of public education relies not only on the skills and dedication of teachers, school administrators, and education support staff, but also on the encouragement and support of the entire community, Now, therefore, I, fY, -D c-2 I GEC that T) S , serving as of Do hereby procla y V-14 I urge all citizens to reaffirm their commitment to our public schools and to recognize the critical role that learning plays in the preservation of liberty. Signed this day of 1989 S. Tu-f 9 M f MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL OCTOBER 16, 1989 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor Richards. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 2 AND SPECIAL MEETINGS OF AUGUST 8 AND AUGUST 10, 1989 APPROVED Motion vas made by Member Smith and vas seconded by Member Kelly to approve the Council Minutes of the Regular Meeting of October 2, and Special Meetings of August 8 and August 10, 1989. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. ADOPTION OF 1990 BUDGET CONTINUED TO 1214/89 Mayor Richards stated that staff is recommending that the 1990 Budget hearing be continued to December 4, 1989 because the deadlines for certifying proposed levies and final levies have been moved to later dates. He asked if there was anyone present who wished to comment on the proposed 1990 Budget. No public comment was heard. It was noted that a letter objecting to an increase in taxes was on file from Mrs. Laurence Weiss, 5918 Wooddale Avenue. Motion vas made by Member Rice to continue the hearing on the 1990 Budget to the Council meeting of December 4, 1989. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. FIRST READING GRANTED FOR ORDINANCE NO. 804 (REGULATING PLATS AND SUBDIVISIONS AND ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A30 (REOUIRING LARGER MINIMUM LOT AREAS FOR CERTAIN LOTS IN R -1 DISTRICT Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Pursuant to due notice given, a public hearing was conducted on proposed amendments to the subdivision and zoning ordinances. Mayor Richards stated that in December of 1988 the Council adopted an ordinance imposing a moratorium on subdivisions in the Single Dwelling Unit District. The purpose was to allow the staff and legal counsel to research and make recommendations to the Council to determine if any changes should be made to procedures and criteria for approving single family subdivisions. Planner Craig Larsen advised that notice was published in the Edina Sun - Current, there was a general news story in the Edina Sun - Current last week about the hearing and that notices were sent to neighborhood groups that are on record with the City Clerk as well as to other residents who have expressed an interest in the process. After several months of deliberation the Community Development and Planning Commission has recommended approval of a new Subdivision Ordinance (No. 804) and amendments to the Zoning Ordinance No. 825. The Planning Commission and staff began the process by reviewing recent subdivision proposals in the City, by reviewing the requirements of other cities in the area, and by reviewing the existing process and requirements. Planner Larsen presented the following summary of subdivisions proposals since January 1, 1985: Number of proposals considered: 25- i s Number of proposals approved: 21 Number of new lots: 85 Range of lot sizes approved: 9,282 - 48,900 s.f. Approximate average lot size approved: 21,076 s.f. Criteria considered by the Planning Commission as determined from a review of minutes: - lot area, lot width, concept, frontage on a public street, size and shape, density, character and symmetry of neighborhood, steep slopes, setback from naturally occurring water bodies, spacing and location of homes. After reviewing this history it was determined: 1) That there is a need in.this community for a flexible system, one that recognizes the diversity of the neighborhoods; 2) The process has produced good results and recently has sustained court action; and 3) That it is now necessary to reflect those past practices in ordinance form. The goal was to create a well- defined, consistent approach to subdivisions with the flexibility to adapt to the many individual and diverse neighborhoods in the City. Planner Larsen said that the result is a proposed new subdivision ordinance (No. 804) and corresponding amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. These were recommended for approval by the Planning Commission at its September 27, 1989 meeting. He observed that to staff's knowledge the product of this work is rather unique and is based on a desire not for more uniformity or homogeneity in the community but to be able to make decisions based on existing circumstances in neighborhoods. There are three sections of Ordinance No. 804 which are considered key to the new process: Definition of Neighborhood, Section 2 - The present ordinance does not define neighborhood but neighborhood has been defined on a case by case basis. That has made it difficult when talking to people about a proposed subdivision and in the public hearing process. Ordinance No. 804 would define "neighborhood" as follows: "All property wholly or partially within 350 feet of the perimeter of the proposed plat or subdivision; provided, however, if the proposed plat or subdivision is a replat, the neighborhood shall be (i) all property wholly or partially within 350 feet of the perimeter of the proposed plat or subdivision, and (ii) all property within the original plat, and including any replats of the original plat then of record or finally approved by the Council pursuant to this ordinance, and which also is within 1,000 feet of the perimeter of the proposed plat or subdivision. If the neighborhood encompasses only a part of a parcel, tract or lot, then the whole of that parcel, tract or lot shall be deemed to be within the neighborhood." Guidelines for Evaluating Subdivisions, Section 14 - This is the heart of the proposed ordinance and is comprised of three sections for evaluating all plats and subdivisions. The first section addresses character and symmetry, consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, environmental impact, and the adequacy of proposed public improvements. The second section deals with .the size and shape of individual lots in the proposed plat. It requires that all lots meet or exceed the median average lot area, lot width and lot depth of the defined neighborhood. It also requires a lot width to perimeter ratio of 0.1 or greater. The ratio is equal to the lot width divided by the total perimeter distance of the lot. The ratio is a means of quantifying the shape of proposed lots. Square and rectangular lots score high, unusual shapes, especially neck lots, tend to score low. The third section sets forth reasons which would require the Council to deny a proposed plat. If the Council makes any one or more of the defined findings, the proposed plat must be denied unless the Council decides that a variance to those requirements is warranted in the process. Subdivision Requirements, Section 12 - Section 12 deals with the information required for the submission of a preliminary plat. The first section sets forth requirements for all subdivisions and are generally the same as present requirements. The second section sets forth additional requirements for a single family subdivision. It requires that the size and dimensions of all lots in the neighborhood (as defined in Section 2) be submitted with the application for preliminary plat. This provides for a complete and accurate comparison of the proposal with the surrounding area. Planner Larsen explained that the remaining sections of Ordinance No. 804 deal with the technical, administrative and legal requirements for processing subdivisions. One change concerns payment of parkland dedication fees which would now be payable when the proponent picks up the signed plat. Amendments to Ordinance No. 825 - The proposed amendments incorporate the standards of the new Subdivision Ordinance into the single family section of the Zoning Ordinance. The minimum lot size for lots approved pursuant to the new Subdivision Ordinance is increased from 9,000 square feet to the median size determined at the time of subdivision. The same is true for lot width and lot depth. Following the presentation, Mayor Richards called for public comment. Michael Bolen, 5207 Doncaster Way, said he was concerned because the proposed ordinance does not address protective covenants which were made at the time of the original plat. People who have bought homes have relied upon the fact that the original plat provided for one house per lot and have expected that the area will be maintained according to the original plan. He said that anyone proposing to subdivide property in the R -1 District should be required to show evidence that something has changed which justifies granting a change from that original plan. Specifically, he referred to a lot in the Edina Highlands that was proposed for subdivision prior to the moratorium. He said that, although he felt the Planning Commission and Council needs the flexibility to adjust to the changing needs of areas in the City, -he was disturbed by the ordinance provisions as to character and symmetry being so general without criteria to determine what was the-original character and symmetry of a particular area. Mayor Richards asked Mr. Bolen if he had some specific proposals for the Council to use to weigh and evaluate the ordinance proposals recommended by the staff and the Planning Commission. Mr. Bolen indicated that he felt the proponent should be required to provide specific information as part of the application process as he had presented at the Planning Commission meeting and as reflected in the minutes. Also, he said there is nothing in the ordinance as to street frontage requirements. Further, he said there is nothing under Sec. 14 (c) relating to character and symmetry or necessity for change. Mr. Bolen concluded by saying that some of the criteria is good and that he liked the definition of neighborhood; however, he said he felt the ordinance was still lacking definite criteria. Conner Schmid, 4711 Meadow Road, commented that he appreciated the work Mr. Bolen had done and that he recognized it is important to neighborhoods who do have some special character and symmetry. Ron Clark, 5716 Long Brake Trail, said that he had studied the proposed ordinance and commended the City Planner and his consultants for the manner in which it is drafted. He said it truly accomplishes what the Council set out to do, e.g. it identifies what is a neighborhood and then determines what is a comparable or median lot within that neighborhood. This would provide a basis for considering small lot subdivisions which was the reason for looking at changing the ordinance. Mr. Clark said that to add additional limitations would confuse the issue and would practically prevent further developments within Edina. Peter Beck, said he was representing Steven Utne of 5257 Lochloy Drive. He recalled that Mr. Utne has a pending application for a lot split which has been held up by the moratorium pending the study of the ordinance. With respect to the proposed ordinance in general, he said they felt that the amendments as proposed are unreasonable, unfair and unnecessary. They are unreasonable because they put an incredible burden on the single family homeowner who seeks to split his lot. It would require the survey of many surrounding lots to obtain the square footage, the mean average and median lot area, the mean average and median lot width and depth. Mr. Beck said that requirement alone would be prohibitively expensive for most single family lot split situations. Also, Mr. Beck said the amendments are unfair because they set up a system by which there will be different lot area, width and depth requirements for similarly situated properties in the same zoning district. Basically, what these amendment would do is create a situation where the median size of existing lots becomes the minimum size for new lots_. Lots sizes should be the same within the single family district. Further, Mr. Beck said the amendments are unnecessary. He referred to the staff conclusion in the March 29, 1989 memorandum that "The end product of the existing subdivision process has produced results reflecting sound community planning." Mr. Beck said they believed that is true; that the existing subdivision and zoning ordinances have worked well. The problems which staff sees these amendments addressing are that the process has been difficult and that there has been some uncertainty and controversy. With respect to the difficulty, the amendments will be more difficult to apply and enforce. They will also result in increased uncertainty because in place of established minimum lot sizes and standards there will in essence be a moving target. The minimum lot size will not be known until the surveying is done and there will be disagreement in terms of accuracy, what lots to include, etc. He said that they felt it is impossible to legislate controversy out the land use process. With respect to the specific application of the amendments to Mr. Utne's situation Mr. Beck said their preliminary analysis indicated automatic denial. The amendments go quite a bit further than implementing a different process with essentially the same requirements. Under the proposed amendments the minimum lot size would increase substantially and, in Mr. Utne's situation, to the point where his 19,000 square foot lot if split would not meet the minimum although surrounded by 9,000 square foot lots which are grandfathered in. Mr. Beck concluded by reiterating that they felt the current requirements are working fine. Mayor Richards then called for discussion by the Council Members. He said that the amendments under consideration are a good work product with which to focus in on the issues the Council has to deal with. Mayor Richards said he disagreed with the language in Section 14 (c) which mandates denial if the Council makes any of the findings listed therein. He said the Council should have the full authority to do what is in the best interest of the community. Attorney Erickson explained that the ordinance specifies five bases upon which the Council shall deny. The first four are really in operation now, e.g. the Council has always looked upon the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance, the health, safety and general welfare of the public and also has been bound by state law. He said those are subjective quantities in and of themselves. It is really based upon the judgement of the Council as to whether these things apply - at least in many cases it is a judgmental call. In some cases there will be very specific criteria that the Council will have to abide by. Finding (5) is new and does allow variances from the specific requirements (median lot area, width and depth). Attorney Erickson pointed out that the language for variances is in Sec. 5 and is a verbatim statement of state statute. What the amendments do is balance the specific criteria by giving the Council some leeway with the subjectivity of some of the approaches to reach a conclusion. He clarified that if the subdivision does not meet the requirements it shall be denied unless the Council grants a variance in which case the requirements would be met as varied which would be sufficient to allow the subdivision to be approved. Member Paulus referred to Sec. 10 (b)(2) concerning the preliminary approval process. She suggested that when the sign is erected telling the public that the property is proposed for subdivision that the proponent should send a letter to the neighborhood explaining the proposal. As an alternative, the proponent could be required to hold a neighborhood meeting. She said this initial communication would eliminate many of the questions and concerns that are brought up during the public hearings. Further, the onus would be on the proponent to inform the neighborhood rather than the neighborhood having to make the effort to get that information. Member Rice made reference to the requirements for lots in the Single Dwelling Unit District and asked if there has ever been requirements as to massing or height for houses. Planner Larsen said there have been no requirements in the R -1 District but that those issues have come up in a general way during the process. Member Rice also referred to the comment made that the cost of providing a survey of lots in the neighborhood would be prohibitive for the single lot developer. Planner Larsen said that the cost implication is unknown and may be substantial. He explained that a lot of these things have been requested over the course of the public hearings and that this requirement would prevent the information coming in piecemeal. This would not be a physical surveying of lots but would be the compiling of information by the proponent's registered land surveyor. Mayor Richards then summarized the issues raised by the Council as follows: 1) Initial communication by proponent with impacted neighbors. 2) Requirements on massing/height of building to be constructed. 3) Process for compiling correct data on neighborhood lots. 4) Mandatory language concerning findings. Planner Larsen suggested that it would be more appropriate to address the issue of massing/height in the Zoning Ordinance and that staff would bring back some options for the Council to consider as an issue separate from the subdivision ordinance. There was brief public comment on the issues followed by Council discussion thereon. It was the consensus of the Council that staff bring back revisions to the ordinances that would address issues #1 and #3 above for Second Reading together with an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance that would address the massing/height issue. Member Smith then introduced Ordinance No. 804 and Ordinance No. 825 -A30 for First Reading as presented and on file in the office of the City Clerk. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards First Reading granted. SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 451 -A6 FOR MIRED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ADOPTED ON SECOND READING Planner Larsen observed that the Council had granted first reading for the sign ordinance amendment at its October 2, 1989 meeting. Approval was granted subject to the condition that the ordinance include a restriction on signage facing residential portions of the development in MDD -5 District (Edinborough) and MDD -6 District (Centennial Lakes). He advised that the amendment language now provides for the restriction. Member Smith made a motion for Second Reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 451 -A6 as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 451 -A6 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 451 BY ADDING REGULATIONS FOR 1= DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 5, paragraph (h)(1) of Ordinance No. 451 is hereby amended by adding -the following: (d) MDD -6 District: One sign per development not to' exceed 1000 square feet in area. For developments with more than one street frontage, one additional sign per street frontage provided each additional sign does not exceed 70 square feet in area. Sec. 2. Section 5, paragraph (h) is hereby amended by adding the following subparagraphs: (10) Project Identification Signs in 14DD -6 District: One freestanding sign for each project per street frontage. The total area of a freestanding sign shall not exceed 50 square feet. (11) Retail Signs: The total area of all wall signs affixed to a building wall shall not exceed 15% of total area of that wall. No signs shall be placed on walls of buildings used for non - residential purposes which walls directly face, abut or adjoin a public park or residential use as such parks or uses are shown on the finally approved Overall Development Plan. (12) Suites Hotels: (a) Wall Signs: The total area of all wall signs affixed to a building shall not exceed 15% of the total area of that wall. No signs shall be placed on walls of buildings used for non - residential purposes which walls directly face, abut or adjoin a public park or residential use as such parks or uses are shown on the finally approved Overall Development Plan. (b) Free- standing Signs: One free standing sign for each building per street frontage. The total area of a free - standing sign for a building having one street frontage shall not exceed 100 square feet. Where a building has two or more street frontages, additional permitted free - standing signs shall not exceed 50 square feet in area. The maximum height of free - standing signs shall be 25 feet. Sec. 3. Section 2 of Ordinance No. 451 is hereby amended by adding the following definition: (bb) "Project" in the Mixed Development District means a multi- family residential complex containing 10 or more units, a shopping center or area, theatre complex containing five or more screens, an office building complex containing three or more buildings, or a public institutional or recreational use. .Sec. 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Kelly. Warren Beck, representing Centennial Lakes Plaza (retail development), stated that he agreed with the concern about signage that would front park and residential areas and would support the ordinance restriction as proposed. He said, for the record., they envision for some areas in Centennial Lakes Plaza in the future the opportunity to use signage which would fit and enhance that area. However, it would be difficult today to describe what that signage might be or the circumstances. He referred to-the area around the pavilion where they anticipate restaurants and where a bookstore currently is placed. There may be the opportunity for signage that may enhance that area and also enhance the utilization of the retail development from the park area. He concluded by saying that they may be back at some point in the future asking for consideration of such signage. Member Rice asked for confirmation that there would be no signage on the north side of the Hawthorn Suites Hotel and also what size sign would be on the south -side. Planner Larsen stated that no signage is proposed for the north side of the hotel. Proposed signage for the south side would be less than 6% of the wall area. Mayor.Richards then called for rollcall vote on the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Ordinance adopted. FIRST READING GRANTED FOR ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 825A -31 (TO ALLOW PRIVATE CLUBS IN PC -1 DISTRICT) Planner Larsen explained that currently private non - profit clubs are allowed in the PC -2 and PC -3 Commercial Districts. The proposed amendment would allow private clubs in the PC =1 Commercial District but would restrict the size to not exceed 2,500 square feet of gross floor area. In the PC -2 and PC -3 District the size of clubs is not limited. The limitation proposed in the PC -1 District would be consistent with the limitation placed on other uses such as bakeries and clothing stores. The proposed amendment would allow the Edina American Legion to relocate from the Grandview area to the Cahill - Amundson shopping area. The Legion has lost its lease in the Biltmore Building. Planner Larsen said the amendment would potentially impact two other PC -1 Districts in the City, e.g. Valley View/Wooddale and 44th /France. Mayor Richards asked if this would carry with it the ability for a liquor or beer license at those locations. Planner Larsen observed that the Legion currently has an on -sale beer license. The restriction for gross floor area was included to protect against the possibility in the future that they would grow to be a typical American-Legion Club with a bar, restaurant, and catered parties. Member Paulus introduced Ordinance No. 825 -A32 for First Reading as presented and on file in the office of the City Clerk. Motion for First Reading was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards First Reading granted. *BID AWARDED FOR STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. STS -196 (GROVE STREET) Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for Storm Sewer Improvement No. STS -196 (Grove Street) to recommended low bidder, 0 & P Contracting, Inc., at $30,278.50, and to reject all bids for Storm Sewer Improvement Nos. STS -195, STS -199 and STS -200. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR CONCRETE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NOS. S -43, 5 -44, S -46 Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for Sidewalk Improvement No. 5 -43 (Gleason Rd -Dewey Hill to Schey); Sidewalk Improvement No. 5 -44 (Gleason Rd -Schey to Loch Moor) and Sidewalk Improvement No. 5 -46 (Xerxes Av -W. 60th to W. 62nd) to recommended low bidder, Victor Carlson & Sons, Inc., at $91,253.50. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *AWARD OF BID FOR (1) DRY ELECTROSTATIC TRANSFER COPIER CONTINUED TO 11/6/89 Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly to continue award of bid for (1) dry electrostatic transfer copier to November 6, 1989. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR REPLACEMENT ROOF FOR BRAEMAR CLUB HOUSE Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly for avard of bid for replacement roof for Braemar Club House to recommended lov bidder, Curran V. Nielsen Company, Inc., at $21,900.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR HYDRAULIC HAZER ATTACHMENT Motion vas made by Member Smith and vas seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for a hydraulic hammer attachment to recommended lov bidder, Hayden Murphy Equipment Company, at $12,950.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR TREE REPLACEMENT - BRA MAR GOLF COURSE Motion vas made by Member Smith and vas seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for tree replacement at Braemar Golf Course to recommended low bidder, Landscape & Turf, at $9,500.00. -Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF OCTOBER 10, 1989 APPROVED Member Smith moved approval of the following recommended action listed in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of October 10, 1989: 1) To remove the restriction of three -hour parking from the southern vall and east side of the middle aisle of the lover level in Jerry's Parking Ramp, 2) Installation of a 3 -way "STOP" sign at West 70th Street and Tracy Avenue based on speed and volume warrants, and to acknovledge Sections B and C of the Minutes. Motion for approval was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. ACTION ON PARK BOARD RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING GOLF LEAGUES CONTINUED TO 11/20189 Park /Recreation Director Bob Kojetin advised that the Park Board at their meeting of October 10, 1989, revisited the Braemar golf league policies which had been recommended by the Board and approved by the Council on November 2, 1987. Specifically, the policies reviewed were: 1) All golf league members must be residents; present non - residents may continue through 1989, and 2) Beginning with 1990, all league members are limited to only one league or division. The Park Board voted to: 1) Reconfirm that at the end of this year individuals can belong to only one league, plus participating in the couple's league, and 2) That the 1987 policy concerning residency be revised to grandfather in non - residents that are currently in league play with no limitation as to number of years. Director Kojetin stated that numerous letters had been received from league members and residents which were included in the packets sent to the Board prior to their meeting and were included in the Council packets. Since the Park Board meeting many additional letters have been received in response to,the Board's action which have also been included in the Council packets. Eleanore Compton, 7520 Cahill Road, reiterated the comments made in her letter dated October 12, 1989 asking that non - residents be allowed to stay in leagues and that members in dual leagues be permitted to maintain the present status. She said that there are only 48 women who are in two leagues which equates to 12 tee off times out of 2,240 tee off times per week. Attrition would take care of any future needs. Sylvia Eisler, 5905 Chowen Avenue, said the Braemar Women's Golf Leagues disagree with the recommendations of the Park Board and are asking that those who currently have dual membership and non - resident status be permitted to continue "as is ". She said they would rather not be placed in two divisions, e.g. non - residents who can stay and those residents with dual memberships who must give up one league. She said this would create strong feelings and would split the leagues down the middle. They firmly believe that the future addition of the 9 -hole course will provide room for all and that future attrition will bring the memberships down to the requested levels. Mrs. Eisler mentioned that since 1987 they have decreased the 9 -hole women's groups from 60 to 48. They did this willingly in order to open up the Braemar Golf Course from 6:00 to 6:54 a.m. to give residents the chance to go out and play 18 holes of golf before they went to work in the morning. She concluded by saying that, as indicated in some of the letters, they are asking that non - residents and those with dual membership not be asked to leave now. John Vallerie, Braemar Manager, explained how this all started. He said he had an extremely long waiting list for the Braemar Men's Club, approximately 185 in 1986.. Some'men were approaching him to say they had to wait 3 to 5 years to get into the two men's leagues. In order to address this it was suggested that they could only be in one league. The ensuing issue of the women's leagues came up and they said the rule must be applicable to both genders. Member Kelly asked Mr. Vallerie if the new 9 -hole course will alleviate the problem. Mr. Vallerie said it'will help but the question will be how much time to set aside for league play. If the league play,percentage is expanded for the new 9 -hole course, then obviously not as much open'time would be gained to meet the growing demands from the residents. He said the number of patron card holders is growing by 100 /150 per year; as that public resident use grows it creates a situation where they cannot get on the course. It becomes an issue of trying to balance time for league play versus open play. Member Paulus asked if the one league restriction applied to the men's leagues; how many people are denied tee times and how many cannot get into leagues. Mr. Vallerie said the one league restriction would apply equally to men's and women's leagues. On an average day in summer 225/250 individuals per .day cannot be accommodated for open play. Approximately 185 men are waiting to get into the men's leagues. Some of the women's leagues have waiting lists and some do not. Member Paulus asked if those waiting to get into leagues were in the 55 +,age group. Mr. Vallerie said that was correct. Member Paulus asked if the City would be making Braemar Golf Course.a recreation facility for a certain age group that would prohibit a younger age group from growing up to take the place of those now in leagues when they will no longer be participating. Mr. Vallerie said that one step to address that concern was that he had approached the Park Board and they had approved the intent that new members in the men's leagues would under the age of 40. He added that in no way would the policies deny residents who are patron holders from electing to play during open tee times. Ruth Wherry, 6105 Beard Avenue South, said that as she understood it there are only 50 women who belong to two leagues. If they were allowed to play in a league plus in the couple's league that would leave out those women like herself who is widowed. Member Rice commented that the impact of allowing non- residents to remain is very small and the impact of participation in two leagues is even less and will be smaller in 1991 when the new nine hole course is opened. He said his position would be to grandfather in those, both men and women, who are in two leagues today but not allow anyone else to join two leagues. Mayor Richards asked that if the Council decides to maintain the status quo would it not in effect keep the waiting list for the Braemar Men's Club at approximately 150/165 people for the 1990 golf season. Mr. Vallerie said the men's waiting list would change very slightly if left at the status quo but will improve greatly if the Council approves the one league policy as it will mean the immediate reduction of approximately 40 golfers. Member Paulus commented that there were no representatives from the Braemar Men's Club present and asked if they are in favor of the one league policy. Mr. V.allerie said the comments he has heard are that many are in favor of the one league policy and think that is a fair way to approach it but there are also those that are contrary. Mayor Richards observed that there is an argument that can be made that those who supported the golf course facility.are those who should be given consideration. He said he recognized that the City of Edina has to stand behind the payment of the bonds on the golf course. However, since the construction of the facility there has not been any moneys taken out of the City's coffers to support that facility. Those who have truly supported it financially have been the users and that he would be concerned that the Council adopt a view that in effect would work as a dissidence to those individuals who have supported that facility all those years. Mayor Richards said there may well come a day when we would want non - residents to use the facility just as residents use other golfing facilities in the larger community.. He said that, if it is the consensus of the Council, we look at what would happen if we preserve the status quo for one more year or in effect rescind the action that ,was taken in 1987 and then revisit the issue after the nine hole course is open. Member Rice said he concurred with Mayor Richards' position with the understanding that the National Car Rental and Hennepin County leagues will not be playing at Braemar in 1990. Member Smith suggested that we leave the status quo by rescinding the 1987 action and see what happens when the new nine hole course is opened in 1991 and revisit the issue at that time. After lengthy discussion by the Council Members, Mayor Richards suggested that this matter be continued to November 20 so that everyone could be heard and with the understanding that staff would bring back a specific proposal in response to the discussion by the Council for action at that time. Notion was made by Member Rice to continue the matter concerning golf league policies to the meeting of November 20. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. REPORT GIVEN ON PURCHASE OF WHITE OAKS LOTS Assistant Manager Gordon Hughes reported that the City closed on the purchase of Lot 9, White Oaks Second Addition and Lot 1, White Oaks Third Addition on October 10, 1989. The closing occurred after the City received half of the required purchase price from residents in the White Oaks area. Mayor Richards said that he had talked during the recess with several members of the White Oaks Improvement Association who would like the Council to adopt a statement of intent or declaration, as requested in their letter of September 19, 1989, that would recognize the permanancy of the natural condition of the White Oaks lots. They said if there was any problem with that they would like to come back at the next meeting to discuss their request. They also wanted the Council to understand their appreciation for action in acquiring the lots. Member Smith made a motion to direct staff to draft a resolution that would be recordable restricting the property to its present condition. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. WATER AND SERER RATE INCREASES APPROVED Manager Rosland recalled that the Council had discussed proposed fees and charges for 1990 at the October 2, 1989 meeting. Staff had recommended that the water and sewer rates be increased due to higher sewage treatment costs with the increase weighted towards the water rate side for several reasons. Following discussion the majority of the Council Members were not in favor of the recommendation and asked that a modified proposal be brought back that would reflect proportionally the increased costs to the City for sewer and water. Following further research, Finance Director Wallin would propose the following: Proposed Rates $ .42 per 100 1.30 per 100 27.10 for 1st cu ft 5.00 per qua % Increase cu ft 5% cu.ft 13% 1600 0% rter 0% Finance Director Wallin said the increases would be as of January 1, 1990 and would take effect with the billings for the winter quarter (February). Member Kelly questioned why the water /sewer rates for comparative cities are higher that those charged by Edina. Engineer Hoffman explained that the cities of Bloomington, Eden Prairie and Richfield have additional costs for softening their water while Edina does not. Member Smith questioned the 5% increase in proposed water rates following the increase approved by the Council last fall. Engineer Hoffman explained that we are starting to pay on the new water tower and well. Director Wallin said that last year's increases were basically just to pay off the bond proceeds used for the construction of the new water tower and well. The 5% increase in water currently being proposed is for inflated NSP charges as well as inflation of costs for repairs on the water system. The eater rate increase would equate to approximately $60,000 more revenue and is needed to break even on the water portion of the utility fund. Member Kelly moved approval of the proposed increases in water and sewer rates as presented, effective January 1, 1990. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Walter Sandison, 4612 W. 58th Street, stated his objection to the proposed increases for water and sewer. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards Nays: Smith Motion carried. APPOINTMENT MADE TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION Mayor Richards stated that he would recommend Charles S. Ingwalson, 4612 Arden Avenue, for appointment to the Community Development and Planning Commission. Member Smith made a motion for consent of the Mayor's appointment of Charles S. Ingwalson to the Community Development and Planning Commission to fill an unexpired term to February 1, 1990. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *OFF -SALE BEER LICENSE APPROVED FOR THE COUNTRY STORE AT 6775 YORK AVENUE SOUTH Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly to approve issuance of an off -sale 3.2 beer license to the Country Store located at 6775 York Avenue South. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. Current Rates Water $, .40 per 100 cu ft Sewer 1.15 per 100 cu ft Minimum Charge 27.10 for 1st 1800 cu ft' Storm Sewer 5.00 per quarter Proposed Rates $ .42 per 100 1.30 per 100 27.10 for 1st cu ft 5.00 per qua % Increase cu ft 5% cu.ft 13% 1600 0% rter 0% Finance Director Wallin said the increases would be as of January 1, 1990 and would take effect with the billings for the winter quarter (February). Member Kelly questioned why the water /sewer rates for comparative cities are higher that those charged by Edina. Engineer Hoffman explained that the cities of Bloomington, Eden Prairie and Richfield have additional costs for softening their water while Edina does not. Member Smith questioned the 5% increase in proposed water rates following the increase approved by the Council last fall. Engineer Hoffman explained that we are starting to pay on the new water tower and well. Director Wallin said that last year's increases were basically just to pay off the bond proceeds used for the construction of the new water tower and well. The 5% increase in water currently being proposed is for inflated NSP charges as well as inflation of costs for repairs on the water system. The eater rate increase would equate to approximately $60,000 more revenue and is needed to break even on the water portion of the utility fund. Member Kelly moved approval of the proposed increases in water and sewer rates as presented, effective January 1, 1990. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Walter Sandison, 4612 W. 58th Street, stated his objection to the proposed increases for water and sewer. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards Nays: Smith Motion carried. APPOINTMENT MADE TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION Mayor Richards stated that he would recommend Charles S. Ingwalson, 4612 Arden Avenue, for appointment to the Community Development and Planning Commission. Member Smith made a motion for consent of the Mayor's appointment of Charles S. Ingwalson to the Community Development and Planning Commission to fill an unexpired term to February 1, 1990. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *OFF -SALE BEER LICENSE APPROVED FOR THE COUNTRY STORE AT 6775 YORK AVENUE SOUTH Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly to approve issuance of an off -sale 3.2 beer license to the Country Store located at 6775 York Avenue South. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *1990 LABORATORY SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY APPROVED Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that it hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor and Manager to execute, on behalf of the City, the Environmental Health Services Agreement between the County of Hennepin and the City of Edina, for the period of January 1, 1990 through December 31, 1990, to enable Hennepin County to purchase laboratory support services through the Edina Tri -City Laboratory. Motion adopted on rollcall vote, five ayes. *TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE APPROVED FOR THE EDINA FOUNDATION ( EDINAMITE) Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly to approve issuance of a temporary on -sale liquor license to The Edina Foundation for EDINAMITE (Dynamite Jazz 189) to be held on November 18, 1989. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *HEARING DATE OF 11/06/89 SET FOR BEER LICENSE FEES Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly setting November 6, 1989 as hearing date to consider an increase in beer license fees. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. i CENTENNIAL LAKES PHASE IV DISCIISSED Mayor Richards made reference to a letter from L.A. Laukka Development Company dated.October 11, 1989 advising that they have been unable to achieve enough Centennial Lakes Phase IV presales in the .semi- luxury condominium building to proceed. Mr. Laukka had stated that they would like to initiate construction of the fourth building yet this year and propose that it be an elevator building - same as Phase III. Executive Director Hughes said that resolutions for conveyance of Phase IV would be brought to the HRA on November 6, 1989. He said no formal action is required at this time. AMM POLICIES AND LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS FOR 1990 NOTED -Manager Rosland referred to the AMM Policies and Legislative Proposals for 1990, noting that the Board of Directors will be meeting in about ten days to review and consider these. The General Membership meeting to consider and approve these policies will be held on Thursday evening, November 2, 1989. Manager Rosland stated that, generally speaking, there is nothing in the proposed policies with which the Council would have a strong disagreement and that a number of the policies have been carried over from last year. SAFETY OF PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE OVER CROSSTOWN HIGHWAY QUESTIONED Member Rice asked if anyone is responsible for checking the safety of the pedestrian Bridge over the Crosstown Highway. He said a resident had raised this question in regard to the ending of the Fourth of July Fireworks when that bridge is packed with people. He asked that this be checked out. ROBBINSDALE CODE REGARDING PROPERTY MAINTENANCE NOTED Member Rice referred to a newspaper article concerning the City of Robbinsale's proposed code regarding property maintenance. He said this subject has been of concern to him. POSSIBILITY OF CURBSIDE LEAF PICKUP DISCIISSED Member Rice said a resident had written him a note asking why Edina does not have curbside leaf pickup, e.g. have residents rake leaves to curb, have them swept up and avoid all the plastic bags, etc. Manager Rosland said the City had tried this many years ago and found it to be a very expensive process. The City of Roseville has done it but has gotten out of that procedure because of the cost. SAFETY ISSUE RAISED CONCERNING T.H. 100 EXIT AT BENTON AVENUE Member Rice said that he felt the something was lacking at the T.H. 100 exit onto Benton Avenue. He mentioned that the sight lines are poor and that traffic coming down Benton is traveling fast and do not stop. He suggested that the Traffic Safety Committee review and comment on that situation. FEES QUESTIONED FOR LABORATORY SERVICES PROVIDED TO HENNEPIN COUNTY Member Kelly asked if the fees the City is charging for providing laboratory services to Hennepin County are adequate or if they should be increased. EFFECT OF BLOOMINGTON'S SKYLINE ORDINANCE ON EDINA QUESTIONED Member Kelly made ,reference to the newspaper article concerning Bloomington's proposed skyline ordinance that would limit the height of buildings that would be constructed adjacent to residential property and asked if that would have any effect on Edina. Manager Rosland said he did not have an answer but would have staff look at this. SWSCC MINUTES TO BE DISTRIBUTED TO COUNCIL Member Smith commented that he is the Council representative to the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission and that he would like to have the Council Members receive copies of the Commission's minutes on an ongoing basis. He said the Commission is sponsoring a member news program that will cost approximately $115,000 over the next year and that cities' staffs are enthused about it. He said he would feel more comfortable if the Council had those minutes so that they would be aware of what is going on. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES DISCUSSED Member Smith said that he would like to see more background information included in the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes to better understand the requests brought to the Committee and the recommendations made in response. BOARD OF EDUCATION STRATEGIC PLANNING SESSION RESCHEDULED Member Paulus informed the Council that the Board of Education Strategic Planning Session has been rescheduled for November 5, 6, 7 and 8. REPORT GIVEN ON GRANDVIEW CEMETERY MEETING Mayor Richards reported that the City Manager and he had met with Harry Lindberry to discuss the concerns that had been raised by the neighbors at the August 7, 1989 Council Meeting with regard to the Grandview Cemetery property. Mayor Richards said that Mr. Lindberry had stated that he was relocating his trucking-business to the Chaska /Chanhassen area but that he was not specific as to when he would get final approval from the municipality involved. Mr. Lindberry owns approximately 70 acres, 35 of which are cemetery now. When more land is needed he sells it to the cemetery association. The long range intent is that all 70 acres will be fully developed as a cemetery some day. Mr. Lindberry said he would continue to communicate with the City and in turn he mentioned two issues in which he felt the City was less than a good citizen: 1) Dumping on the southwest corner of the Lindberry property, and 2) Erosion as a result of storm water runoff. Manager Rosland will be working with staff to respond to those concerns. Mayor Richards indicated that Manager Rosland will write a short memorandum on the meeting with Mr. Lindberry and will send that to the neighbors so that they will know what is being done is address their concerns. COUNCIL REQUESTED TO SPONSOR FUNCTION TO BE AUCTIONED AT EDINAMITE ON 11/18/89 Mayor Richards stated that the request had been made that the Council consider sponsoring a function that could be auctioned at the EDINAMITE benefit on November 18, 1989 as has been done in the past. Following discussion, it was agreed to respond by saying that the Council wants to do something and they are looking for a new activity. Further, that any suggestions will be welcomed and that something specific will be decided on November 6. SALE AND DEVELOPMENT OF FORMER CAHILL SCHOOL PROPERTY DISCUSSED Mayor Richards commented that apparently there is a proposal for sale and development of the former Cahill School property owned by Marsh Everson. As part of that, there is an issue as to what can or should be done with regard to the area at W. 70th and Cahill Road that is zoned Heritage Preservation Overlay District (HPD) and on which sits the historic St. Patrick's church building. Mayor Richards said that he had met with Ron Clark, the developer, at his request concerning that issue. Following that discussion, Mayor Richards said he thought that, before this proposal for development is brought to the Council, they should schedule a special meeting with the Heritage Preservation Board to focus on the historical and other facts and to hear what the alternatives might be in dealing with that site. After brief discussion, it was informally agreed that Manager Rosland should contact Foster Dunwiddie and the Heritage Preservation Board as to possible dates for a special meeting with the Council, and that the date would be determined at the meeting of November 6. BEST WISHES EXTENDED TO ERIC HEDBLOM ON NEW POSITION Mayor Richards announced that this would be the last Council meeting covered by Eric Hedblom, Edina Sun - Current reporter, who had accepted a new position. He commented that in covering the Council meetings Eric has been diligent, honest and has reported the facts as he saw them. On behalf of the Council, Mayor Richards thanked him.for his fair reporting and wished him the best of luck in his new career in environmental consulting. SEMI - AUTOMATIC 9MM PISTOL TO BE DEMONSTRATED BY POLICE DEPARTMENT Manager Rosland recalled that this year the Police Department has converted from the six -shot revolver to the semi - automatic 9mm pistol. He extended to the Council the invitation of the Police Department to a demonstration of the new issued sidearm to be held on Monday, October 23 at 4 p.m. at the Braemar Gun Range. PARK & RECREATION DIRECTOR KOJETIN TO BE ENSHRINED IN MINNESOTA SOFTBALL HALL OF FAME Manager Rosland announced that Robert Kojetin, Park & Recreation Director, will be enshrined in the Minnesota Softball Hall of Fame on Saturday night, October 28. *RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED CANCELLING LEVY FOR 1990 ON $5,400,000 G.O. IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1984 AND ON $2,2001000 G.O. REDEVELOPMENT BONDS Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly for adoption for the following resolutions: RESOLUTION CANCELLING AD VALOREM TAXES COLLECTIBLE WITH 1990 GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES LEVIED FOR $5,400,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1984 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has, by resolution adopted September 10, 1984, levied a special ad valorem tag for the payment of principal and interest of its General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1984; said ad valorem tag in the amount of $422,000 being collectible with and as a part of other general taxes for the year 1990; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Sectibn 475.61, permits the cancellation of said levies providing moneys are on hand for payment of principal and interest for said bond issue; and it has been determined by this Council that the required moneys are on hand for the payment of said principal and interest; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that those ad valorem tax levies made by resolution of this Council adopted September 10, 1984, and collectible with and as a part of other general property taxes in said City for the year 1990, be and hereby are cancelled; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota, be authorized and directed to cancel the above described ad valorem tax levies and to delete said levies from taxes to be spread for the year 1990. RESOLUTION CANCELLING AD VALOREM TAXES COLLECTIBLE WITH 1990 GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES LEVIED FOR $2,200,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION REDEVELOPMENT BONDS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has, by resolution adopted November 3, 1975, levied a special ad valorem tax for the payment of principal and interest of its.$2,200,000 General Obligation Redevelopment Bonds, said ad valorem tax in the amount of $270,800 being collectible with and as a part of other general taxes for the year 1990; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, permits the cancellation of said levies providing moneys are on hand for payment of principal and interest for said bond issue; and it has been determined by this Council that the required moneys are on hand for the payment of said principal and interest; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that those ad valorem tax levies made by resolution of this Council adopted November 3, 1975, and collectible with and as a part of other general property taxes in said City for the year 1990, be and hereby are cancelled; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota, be authorized and directed to cancel the above described ad valorem tax levies and to delete said levies from taxes to be spread for the year 1990. Resolutions adopted on rollcall vote; five ayes. *CLAIMS PAID Notion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly to approve payment of the following claims as per pre -list dated 10/16/89: General Fund $240,253.94, C.D.B.G. $6,211.00, Art Center $11,232.03, Capital Fund $153.40, Swimming Pool Fund $102.76, Golf Course Fund $20,132.95, Recreation Center Fund $7,005.49, Gun Range Fund $300.62, Edinborough Park $9,464.48, Utility Fund $20,304.17, Storm Sewer Utility $2,084.62, Liquor Dispensary Fund $113,424.97, Construction Fund $809,593.06, Total $1,240,263.49. Motion carried-on rollcall vote, five ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the meeting adjourned at 11:27 p.m. City Clerk "- CONSENT ITEM III.A.l. LOCATION LOT DIVISION NUMBER LD -89 -8 L O C A T 10 N 4700 and 4704 Merilane EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0 �a LD -89 -8 4700 and 4704 Merilane Request: Lot Line Adjustments Mr. Larsen informed the Commission a new house is under construction at 4704 Merilane. In order to provide a more desirable driveway access the property owners have agreed to adjust their common lot line.. Both parties will continue to comply with all Zoning Ordinance requirements. Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends approval. Commissioner G..Workinger moved to recommend Lot Division approval. Commissioner McClelland seconded the motion. All voted aye. Motion carried. LD -89 -8 Request: Refer to COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT NOVEMBER 1, 1989 4700 and 4704 Merilane Lot Line Adjustments Attached Survey A new house is under construction at 4704 Merilane (Parcel B). In order to provide a more desirable driveway access the property owners have agreed to adjust their dommon lot line. Both parties will continue to comply with all Zoning Ordinance requirements. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval. Q- V °° .. 6oP 3q 411 e'ly line oFLoi 60A 2 C;2 �3 d5 I eo GO t r. \ / ...p_44o09'10 , � 12: 1101 e i +• i / 10 00 v 0 tz Ic , \ a / \ Ev / /�T S0. \� �• o / 1 O• '4 6 eJ� 'I��, // obi z69 07 ARCE A/� P O N O 5, 36 ne comer 0' 1 s `gig RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute various separate parcels: Lot 60 and Lot 60A, ROLLING GREEN SECTION TWO and Lot 1,.Block 1, GUNNAR JOHNSON'S REARRANGEMENT, Rolling Green; WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to subdivide said tracts into the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "Parcels "): Parcel A - Lot 60 and that part of Lot 60A, ROLLING GREEN SECTION TWO and that part of Lot 1, Block 1, " GUNNAR JOHNSON'S REARRANGEMENT, Rolling Green ", according to the recorded plats thereof, which lie northerly of the following described line and its extensions: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Lot 60A; thence northwesterly along the easterly line of said Lot 60A, a distance of 17.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence southwesterly, passing through a point on the south line of said Lot 60A distant 72.00 feet westerly from said southeast corner; and said line there terminating; and Parcel B - That part of Lot 60A, ROLLING GREEN SECTION TWO and that part of Lot 1, Block 1, GUNNAR JOHNSON'S REARRANGEMENT, Rolling Green ", according to the recorded plats thereof, which lie southerly of the following described line and its extensions: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Lot 60A; thence northwesterly along the easterly line of said Lot 60A, a distance of 17.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence southwesterly, passing through a point on the south line of said Lot 60A distant 72.00 feet westerly from said southeast corner; and said line there terminating; WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning'Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance Nos. 801 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. ADOPTED this 6th day of November, 1989. 'i, i4� A. o e A, ch • ,N�bRPOMt�O • lose REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland From: Craig Larsen Date: November 6, 1989 Subject: SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE NO. 804 AND ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 825 -A30 & 825 -A33 . Recommendation: Agenda Item #111. 'B. & C. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA El To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution 0 Ordinance ❑ Discussion IF Consider alternative Ordinance language and continue second reading to November 20, 1989. Info /Background: -,At the October 16, 1989, meeting the City Council granted first reading of the proposed Subdivision Ordinance and related amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. At the same time the Council identified four issues requiring further consideration. They were: 1. A requirement that applicants give mailed notice of the proposed subdivision prior to hearings by the Planning Commission; 2. Consider ordinance amendments which would address the problem of massing; 3. Allow applicants for a proposed subdivision to supply necessary data as to adjoining properties without being required to incur the expense of a surveyor; and 4. Prepare alternative language to the "shall" deny provision of Section 14 which would make the determination permissive. r; In addition to the preceding issues, speakers at the hearing raised the issue of uniformity. The argument made was that because the definition of neighborhood is a floating and changing concept, two lots side by side may have considerably different lot size minimums applicable to them, and therefore the ordinance does not have "uniform regulations" as required by statute. It is Tom Erickson's opinion that the "regulations are uniform in their language and application" However, the application of the uniform regulations may cause differing results. The fact that the results differ between lots does not mean the regulations are not uniform. Therefore, he believes the ordinance does meet the statutory requirements of uniformity. However, because of the discrepancies that can result, at least in theory, between two lots side by side, Mr. Erickson and I are recommending a revised definition of neighborhood for Council consideration. The revised definition is: Neighborhood: All lots in the Single Dwelling Unit District as established by the Zoning Ordinance, which and (i) touch, abut or adjoin any part of the proposed plat or subdivision, (ii) are wholly or partially within 350 feet of any part of such lots and parcels which so touch, abut or adjoin the proposed plat or subdivision, except, however, that there shall be excluded from (i) and (ii) above lots used for publicly owned parks, playgrounds, athletic facilities and golf courses, and lots used for conditional uses as established "by the Zoning Ordinance. If the neighborhood includes only a part of a lot, then the whole of that lot shall be included in the neighborhood. As to streets on the perimeter of the proposed plat or subdivision, the 350 feet shall be measured from the common line of the street and the proposed plat or subdivision. ISSUE 1. Mailed Notice The following language would require proponents to give mailed notice to all property owners in the defined neighborhood before the City accepts the proposal for processing and hearings. It does not mandate a neighborhood meeting. Add a new paragraph (3) in Sec. 10 (b) on page 8 after the language required to be on signs, as follows: (3) The applicant shall also give mailed notice to each owner of property within the neighborhood of the proposed plat or subdivision, as such owners, and their addresses, are shown on the records of the City. The notice shall advise of the plat or subdivision, the number of lots proposed to be created, the area, depth and width of the proposed lots and the address and phone number of the applicant. [Subsequent provisions in the ordinance will then provide that the Commission shall hold a hearing upon determination by the Planner that the required mailed notice will have been mailed and the required signs will have been erected for at least 10 days prior to the hearing, but that the Commission may hold its hearing even if such notice is not given and such signs erected.] ISSUE 2. MASSING: The Planning Commission, on November 1, 1989, considered Zoning Ordinance amendments increasing interior side yard setbacks on certain lots. The increased setbacks would reduce the impression of massiveness by increasing the required space between new homes. The Planning Commission considered the following two approaches. (Current requirements are included for reference.) Current Single Dwelling Unit buildings on lots 75 feet or more in width attached garage Single Dwelling Unit buildings on lots less than 75 feet in width Alternative 1 Single Dwelling Unit buildings and attached garages on lots 100 feet in width or more Alternative 2 Front Street 30 30 Front Street 30 Interior Side Yard Setbacks Side Interior Rear Street Side Year Yard 15 10 25 5 15 5 Side Interior Street Side Yard 20 10 On lots having a lot width of 85 feet or more the minimum interior side yard setback shall be increased by one foot for each five feet, or portion thereof, that the lot width exceeds 85 feet. 25 Rear Yard 35 The Planning Commission and staff recommend Alternative 2 which creates a sliding scale formula for determining interior side yard setbacks. All other minimum setbacks would remain unchanged. I have included several graphics that illustrate the effect of the requirement. A major concern of the Commission was the potential impact of the increased minimum setbacks on existing homes. The new setback requirements could prevent or significantly alter plans for additions to existing homes. Their recommendation is that existing homes with conforming setbacks be exempt from the new requirements. New homes and total reconstructions would be subject to the new setback requirements. ISSUE 3. Data concerning neighborhood properties. In Section 12 we have proposed data be obtained from a source acceptable to the planner. This would allow us to verify the source of information, but would not necessarily require a registered land surveyor. ISSUE 4. "Shall deny" language The following paragraph could replace the "shall deny" language of Section 14 with "shall consider ". This is similar to language in the existing Ordinance. Mr. Erickson continues to favor the shall deny language. He feels that it does allow the Council sufficient latitude in judging subdivisions and is a much stronger defense against claims of discrimination or unequal treatment. Revise Sec. 14 (c) on page 20 to read as follows: (c) In addition to the foregoing matters, the Commission, in connection with its recommendation to the Council, and the Council in determining whether to approve or disapprove a proposed plat or subdivision, shall specifically and especially consider the following matters: (1) Whether the proposed plat or subdivision complies with the policies, objectives or goals of the Comprehensive Plan. (2) Whether the proposed plat or subdivision complies with the policies, objectives, goals or requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, including, without limitation, the lot size and dimension requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, and the Flood Plain Overlay District and Heritage Preservation Overlay District of the Zoning Ordinance, as varied by variances therefrom, if any, granted pursuant to the Zoning Ordinance. (3) Whether the design of the proposed plat or subdivision, or design or type of improvements proposed to be placed thereon, may be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public. (4) Whether the proposed plat or subdivision conforms to, and complies with the requirements or, applicable state law. (5) Whether the proposed plat or subdivision complies with the policies, objectives, goals or requirements of this ordinance, as varied by variances therefrom, if any, granted pursuant to this ordinance. ZONING ORDINANCE Minor additions have been added to the proposed ordinance amendment for clarification. The additions are blacklined for Council review. We recommend that second reading for the Ordinances be continued to the November 20, 1989, meeting. There are two reasons for the delay. First, it will allow us to incorporate changes or revisions made by the Council and allow a review of the Ordinance to insure the provisions are consistent throughout the Ordinance. Second, because of time restraints we were not able to publish for the Zoning Ordinance amendment on setbacks in time for this meeting. That public hearing is scheduled for November 20, 1989. I / 100! CURRENT REGULATIONS PROPOSED REGULATIONS Interior Side Yard Setback. on lots having a lot width of 85 feet or greater the required interior side yard setback shall increase by one foot for each five feet, or portion thereof, that the lot width exceeds 85 feet. BUILDING PAD COMPARISON 1'71 91 2' ► 2' IDS ]JO/ -1 /OS I _ISIS . 120 I CURRENT REGULATIONS PROPOSED REGULATIONS Interior Side Yard Setback. On lots having a lot width of 85 feet or greater the required interior side yard setback shall increase by one foot for each five feet, or portion thereof, that the lot width exceeds 85 feet. BUILDING PAD COMPARISON 23' I 23' Mq 109 is., I /e I 1a1_1 1.15 # 1521.6 CURRENT REGULATIONS PROPOSED REGULATIONS ` Interior Side Yard Setback. On lots having a lot width of 85 feet or greater the required interior side yard setback shall increase by one foot for each five feet, or portion thereof, that the lot width exceeds 85 feet. BUILDING PAD COMPARISON DRAFT OF PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES- NOVEMBER 1, 1989, MEETING. Mr. Larsen informed the Commission that the City Council has asked the Commission to consider Zoning Ordinance Amendments which address a perceived over building of some single family lots. Mr. Larsen reported staff.is suggesting the use of larger side yard setbacks to address the problem. In addition to providing for increased spacing between homes on larger lots, the amendments will indirectly reduce lot coverage. The minimum setbacks for smaller lots would not be changed. Using graphics Mr. Larsen presented two approaches to require increased setbacks for larger lots. The first increases the minimum side and rear yard setbacks on lots 100 feet wide or wider. The second method would apply a sliding scale for side yard setbacks on lots 85 feet wide or wider. Mr. Larsen concluded that Council would like feedback on this issue. The majority of the Commissioners were in agreement that house size on newly developed lots have been constructed very large, and developed with the minimum required setbacks. This trend in development gives a feeling of crowding when one views these new houses from the front street. Commissioner McClelland said she feels this is a good idea but could not support the first method of increased minimums. She added in her opinion the sliding scale is the more workable solution. She added requiring a 35 foot rear yard setback would create a hardship for many developers. Commissioner McClelland pointed out that the sense of crowding usually is a result of interior side yard setbacks. The Commission agreed with Commissioner McClelland's observation that the sliding scale is the best option. With graphics Mr. Larsen pointed out to the Commission past subdivisions and how the new setback requirements would affect them. Mr. Larsen noted the proposed new requirements may have implications for developers. He added it is not the intention of the City to prevent large houses within the City, but to create more open space between dwellings, and the feeling of the house being properly constructed for the site, not over - built. Commissioner Workinger told the Commission he believes this proposal would lessen the feeling of massiveness of houses but wonders in reality if it would work efficiently. Commissioner Workinger pointed out an increase in teardowns in neighborhoods. Mr. Larsen said today teardowns usually have been limited to the most expensive neighborhoods, where the lots are over 85 feet in width. The proposed setbacks would benefit the established neighborhood by reducing the impact of a new house that may be larger or architecturally different than what is in the neighborhood at the present time. Commissioner Hale said he has a real problem with this proposal in regards to already platted and constructed property. Commissioner Bailey agreed. He pointed out it is unfair for someone to purchase a house with a conforming sideyard setback of 10 feet, and if in a few years the property.owner wishes to add an addition, they will not be able to do so without a variance. He said there should be some way present property owners would not be negatively impacted by these new requirements. Mr. Larsen agreed that that is a real concern and the additional requirements may be worded in a way that lots platted before a certain date are not subject to the new setbacks, in a sense they are "grandfathered in ". Commissioner Hale said unless something like that is added to the proposed setback language the Board of Appeals would be swamped with variance requests. Commissioner Workinger asked Mr. Larsen if other communities have such a sideyard requirements. Mr. Larsen said to his knowledge no other communities have a requirement like the one proposed. Most communities including Edina have height formulas which require increased setbacks for taller buildings. Commissioner L. Johnson said he has trouble with the proposed requirements. He pointed out the Country Club, and other areas, Morningside, northwest Edina, etc. have all been constructed on small lots. These developments may also appear crowded to some individuals, is there a difference in viewing existing construction versus new construction? Commissioner L. Johnson also pointed out that potential redevelopment of existing properties with the proposed new setback language would create problems for property owners. Commissioner Runyan observed that there are not many large pieces of property in Edina available for large subdivisions. Mr. Larsen concurred with that observation. Commissioner Hale moved to recommend to the Council that the concept of variable sideyard setbacks be approved, but the Commission would like to see the final wording of the recommended changes before they approve it. Commissioner McClelland seconded the motion. Chairman G. Johnson said the last part of the motion is in error because the Commission is an advisory board and recommends approval. If the Council approves the recommended language the Commission will see it in its final form. Commissioner Hale withdrew his motion. Commissioner Bailey said he agrees with Commissioner L. Johnson and his observation regarding presently platted property and the problems this change could create for property owners if they choose to construct a new addition, garage etc. Commissioner Faust agreed and said in a motion we could pinpoint that issue. Commissioner Faust moved to recommend to the Council the approval of the flexible setback concept, with the rear yard setback to remain at 25 feet and that existing conforming properties be "grandfathered in" allowing them redevelopment options that were present at the time they purchased their property. Commissioner McClelland seconded the motion. Ayes; G. Johnson, J. Bailey, N. Faust, V. Shaw, D. Runyan, G. Workinger, C. Ingwalson, R. Hale, H. McClelland. Nays; L. Johnson n 29558 C ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A30 10-31-87 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE.NO. 825 TO REQUIRE LARGER MINIMUM LOT AREAS AND DIMENSIONS FOR CERTAIN LOTS IN THE SINGLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT (R -1) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Subparagraph 1(a) of paragraph E of Section 11 (Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1)) of Ordinance No. 825 is hereby amended to read as follows: (a) single dwelling unit building 9,000 square feet; provided, however, if the lot is in a plat or subdivision approved pursuant to Ordinance No. 804 of the City, then the minimum lot area shall be the same as determined for lots in such plat or subdivision pursuant to said ordinance J1 greater than 9.000 square feet. Sec. 2. Subparagraph 2 of paragraph E of Section 11 (Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1)) of Ordinance No. 825 is hereby amended to read as follows: 2. Minimum Lot Width. Single dwelling unit building -1- 75 feet; provided, however, if the lot is in a plat or subdivision approved pursuant to Ordinance No. 804 of the City, then the minimum lot width shall be the same as determined for lots in such plat or subdivision pursuant to said ordinance jf treater than 75 Sec. 3. Subparagraph 3 of. paragraph E of Section 11 (Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1)) of Ordinance No. 825 is'hereby amended to read as follows: I V 2. Minimum Lot Depth. Single dwelling unit 120 feet; provided, building however, if the lot is in a plat or subdivision approved pursuant to Ordinance No. 804 of the City, then the minimum lot depth shall be the same as determined for lots In such plat or subdivision pursuant to said ordinance IL greater than 12L 1=1L• Sec. 4. There is hereby added to paragraph E of Section 11 (Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1)) of Ordinance No. 825 a new subparagraph 4 as follows: "4. Minimum Lot Width to Perimeter Ratio. Each lot shall have a lot width to perimeter ratio of not less than 6.1." Sec. 5. There is hereby added to paragraph D (Definitions) of Section 3 of Ordinance No. 825, and inserted in the proper alphabetical order in said paragraph D. the following additional definition: "Lot Width to Perimeter Ratio: the quantity resulting from dividing the lot width by the total lineal feet in the perimeter of that lot. Sec.6. Subparagraph 3 of Paragraph T..of Section 7 of Ordinance No. 825 is hereby amended to read as follows: "3. Non - Conforming Lots. A non - conforming lot in the R -1 District used or intended -for a single dwelling unit building -2- shall be exempt from the width, depth and area requirements of this ordinance, provided, that said lot: (a) is not less than 50 feet in width; (b) is not less than 100 feet in depth; (c) has at least 30 feet frontage on a street; and (d) is not at the effective date of this ordinance, or has not at any time subsequent to such effective date, and has not been at any time since October 22, 1951, held in common ownership with all or part of an adjoining lot or parcel which, together, comply with the minimum width, depth and area requirements imposed by this ordinance. A non - conforming lot held as of, or at any time subsequent to, the effective date of this ordinance, or at any time since October 22, 1951, in common ownership with all or part of an adjoining parcel or lot and.which meets the requirements of (a), (b) and (c) above, shall not be decreased in size." Sec L7. This ordinance shall be in effect upon its passage and publication. Attest: Clerk First Beading: Second Beading: Published in the Edina Sun on M15 Mayor c x shall be exempt from the width, depth and area requirements of this ordinance, provided, that said lot: (a) is not less than 50 feet in width; (b) is not less than 100 feet in depth; (c) has at least 30 feet frontage on a street; and (d) is not at the effective date of this ordinance, or has not at any time subsequent to such effective date, and has not been at any time since October 22, 1951, held in common ownership with all or part of an adjoining lot or parcel which, together, comply with the minimum width, depth and area requirements imposed by this ordinance. A non - conforming lot held as of, or at any time subsequent to, the effective date of this ordinance, or at any time since October 22, 1951, in common ownership with all or part of an adjoining parcel or lot and.which meets the requirements of (a), (b) and (c) above, shall not be decreased in size." Sec L7. This ordinance shall be in effect upon its passage and publication. Attest: Clerk First Beading: Second Beading: Published in the Edina Sun on M15 Mayor ' I.1 o e� Cn 0 •'��bRPOM��O • 1860 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland Agenda Item # 111. B. 3. From: Craig Larsen Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: November 6, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Zoning Ordinance 0 To Council Amendment to allow private clubs in the Action ❑ Motion PC -1 District ❑ Resolution 51 Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Grant second reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment 825 -A32. Info /Background: The Amendment will allow small private clubs in the PC -1, Commercial District. The Council granted first reading on October 16, 1989. ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A32 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 825 TO ALLOW PRIVATE CLUBS IN THE PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (PC -1) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 16.(B) of Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding the following principal use: "53. Clubs, lodge halls and meeting rooms, offices and other facilities for non - profit organizations not exceeding 2,500 square feet of gross floor area." Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. o First Reading: October 16, 1988 Second Reading: Published in the Edina Sun - Current on ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor 1r O 1 Jw O REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # Iy. A. From: Francis Hoffman Consent ❑ City Engineer Information Only ❑ Date: 6 November, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Vacation of City To Council Interest in Parcel As To Public Right - Action 0 Motion Of-Way ❑ .Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Vacate right -of -way interests that the City may have in attached parcel sketch with reservation of current utility easement for sanitary sewer. Info /Background: Property owner involved is attempting to clarify any interest that the City may have in property that is described as the "Old County Road" or "Old Eden Prairie Road ". The request is to vacate any right -of -way interests that the City may have for public roads except for existing right -of -way as related to Olinger Road and Vernon Avenue. The proponent will be in attendance to explain the situation which is unusual in relation to our normal vacation procedures. J i YILO • li1 O a - lb 1 / J.L.M. � it de ✓ C V ° 0 o� c � 04o, 00 ? as I A I I /• b � w c OL W �1 7d I eL i .'�,1,11�1111 111111111111111111111 1111111111111111 �'i /11111111111 IIIIII�II�IIIIOIIIIIIIII�lllll�� .�lllll�� . 111111111111111111 MURMUROUS.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1. Cip"m . I ■1 ■1 ■1 ■1■1�� I 5�i.0O y't• se 17 -� EDINA :11G41Len1 L4KESID Ao4 .7 I¢EPL OT \ 2 1 �c o\�,o Iti y Reflects Area Requested To Be Vacated % ? di o: �: :o ss ee Q I [ - Ne[•ae'rl•c . dabcripi'lon N 3 Exc.lP�'i0*+ P!� d[td lk -- _J° _ J.LH. br.�NeE•26'n'E� f...d 1�.' ;ERNE . /Q.. !7 -N Lr LMG O� EDw. �� 445.OD �\ •ICG wppn� 9 m 19 � Ir, 8 Z Ep1NA M1f.►a LlaNOb �. . I 5�i.0O y't• se 17 -� EDINA :11G41Len1 L4KESID Ao4 .7 I¢EPL OT \ 2 1 �c o\�,o Iti y Reflects Area Requested To Be Vacated w�1N��j U REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Edina City Council FROM: Bob Kojetin, Park and Recreation Department Director VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: November .1, 1989 ITEM DESCRIPTION: . Company Van Valkenburg Park Lighting 1. CSI Electric, Inc. 2. Killmer Electric Co., Inc. 3. Klein Electric, Inc. 4. Ridgedale Electric, Inc. 5. Electric Service Co. of Mpls., Inc. 6. Collins Electric Co. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: CSI Electric, Inc. $129,500.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: AGENDA ITEM vI . B Amount of Quote or Bid 1. 129,500.00 2. 137,500.00 3. 138,450.00 4. 140,645:00 5. 14.4,700.00 6. 158,641.00 Van Valkenburg Park lighting system for 3 field softball complex in accordance with specifications submitted by Cain, Ouse Associates, Inc., consulting engineers. ture rlPnartmnn+ / The Recommended bid is within budget not within bum Kenneth Rosland, City Manager Director ,.,14 A. Arles ° '` REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: City Council Members FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director Edina Park and Recreation VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: October ,12, 1989- AGENDA ITEM Vi. C ITEM DESCRIPTION: Fence Replacement - Braemar Driving Range Companv Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Crowley Company, Inc. 1. $9,435 2. Minnesota Valley Fence 2. $12,494 3 • Anchor Fence 3. $16,018 4. 4. - 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Crowley Company, Inc. at $9,435 GENERAL INFORMATION: - This is to remove the old fence and raise the heighth of the fence on the west side of the range to protect people in the 1st fairway of the regulation course from being hit. The Recommended bid is M within budget not within beset J6fin,�Naiiin, Fin Kenneth Rosland City o e RECD r ;_> o UEST FOR PURCHASE HfJ.� may: TO: EDINA PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT FROM: BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT:_ REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5000 DATE November 1, 1989 AGENDA ITEM VI.D ITEM DESCRIPTION: 5 E -Z Go -Cars Companv Amount of Quote or &d 1. Versatile Vehicles, Inca 1. $14,100 2. E -Z -Go Textron 2. $14,500 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Versatile- Vehicles, Inc. $14,100 GENERAL INFORMATION: These are the only 2 E -Z -Go dealers in.this area and we think it is advisable to maintain our fleet .100% E -Z -Go as they give us good servic, and it is much less expensive to maintain only one line of repair parts. Also, this is the only car that has a -metal body and is more durable than fibreglass. Sig ure Depart en The Recommended bid is jat - within budget not within bu_Qldet n Wallin, FirjWnce Director Kenneth Rosland, City Manager �1 o e� Cn • �N�bRPORP��O • iBeB , REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KEN ROSLAND CITY MANAGER From: RALPH CAMPBELL COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR Date: NOVMEBER 6, 1989 Subject: DRY ELECTROSTATIC TRANSFER COPIER Recommendation: Reject all bids and rebid. Info /Background: Agenda Item # vi . E . Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion On September 29, 1989, the City received nine bids for a copier to replace the ailing 10 -year old primary City Hall copier. While analyzing these bids, staff found that some key claims made by the vendors for their copiers conflicted with an independent analysis secured by the City. In order to resolve these conflicts, staff intends to tighten the bid specifications for...a rebid. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor Richards & Council Members FROM: Susan Wohlrabe VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager . SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 DATE: November 3, 1989 AGENDA ITEM . yI.F. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Refrigeration - Grandview Liquor Store Company Amount. of Quote or Bid 1. Merit Supply 1. .$12,281.40 2. Donovan International 2. $12,654.30 3. NorLake 3. $15,255.00 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Merit Supply - $12,281.40 GENERAL INFORMATION: 3 stainless steel NorLake refrigerators (one for beer and two for wine) with sliding glass doors Signature The Recommended bid is Within budget not witfii Kenneth Rosland, City Ma Wallin, Fin ` ce Director A. r 0 se BB REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Date: NOVEMBER 2, 1989 Subject: PUBLIC HEARING BEER LICENSE FEES Agenda Item # VII. Consent ❑ Proposed 1990 Information Only ❑ $175.00 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution 0 Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Approval of proposed increase in beer license fees. Info /Background: An increase in the fees for beer licenses is proposed for 1990 as follows: On -Sale Beer (renewal) On -Sale Beer (new) Off -Sale Beer (renewal) Off -Sale Beer (new) 1989 Proposed 1990 $165.00 $175.00 220.00 230.00 165.00 175.00 220.00 230.00 The increase in beer license fees would recoup increased costs for staff time spent in issuance of the licenses and inspections. The last increase was effective January 1, 1988. Notice of the public hearing to increase beer license fees was mailed to all current licensees. To date no comment has been received. A. o eA_� Cn jade To: Ken Ros 1 and From: Janet Chandler REPORT/RECOMMENDATION Date: November 6, 1989 Subject: Recyc 1 i ng P rog ram Progress Report Recommendation: Agenda Item # VI i i . A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA © To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance El Discussion Info /Background: PROGRESS REPORT ATTACHED: `Recycling Container Placement `Route Supervision *Publicity *Questions and Concerns *Recycling- Tonnage and Participation RECYCLING REPORT NOVEMBER 6, 1989 This report outlines measures that have been taken to alleviate service problems, particularly the issue of container placement. Also,a monthly recycling tonnage and participation chart is included. RECYCLING CONTAINER PLACEMENT As Council has noted, many residents have been placing recyclables (and garbage) curbside, despite City Ordinances to the contrary. There are several reasons why this may happen: - Residents (especially new residents) may think it's the correct thing to do. - Residents don't want trucks on their driveways. - Residents want to make the hauler's job easier. Our efforts to educate the public on placement of recyclables, garbage and yard waste included information in the recycling flyer, articles in the Edina Sun and a cable TV program. However, as Council discussed on October 2, these instructions were widely disregarded. Council also reported that BFI Recycling drivers were not following the agreed -upon procedure of moving emptied containers back from the curb and leaving reminder notes. Therefore, City Staff and BFI worked out a plan to remedy the situation. ROUTE OBSERVATION AND SUPERVISION During October the City Recycling Coordinator and BFI Supervisor Craig Seim checked out portions of each of the five recycling routes, spending an hour each time observing the performance of the drivers and the appearance of the neighborhoods. The drivers, meantime, were instructed again by BFI staff on the correct procedure and were aware that they would be observed from time to time. The results of our observations were: October 11, eight emptied containers were curbside, with no note inside; October 17, five curbside; October 19, none curbside; October 23, two curbside; October 27, two curbside. We also noticed in the later weeks, that reminder notes had been placed in many containers. Although we didn't tour the entire route each day, our impression was that the drivers' performance improved considerably during the month of October. We plan to continue with spot checks in the future. FUTURE PUBLICITY Recycling program information and reminders about placement of garbage, recyclables and yard waste will be included in the Edina newsletter scheduled for distribution to each household in January. page 2. CALLS FROM RESIDENTS: QUESTIONS AND CONCERNS Missed Pickups Missed pickup calls to the Edina Recycling Office averaged between two and three a day for the month of October. BFI reported that they received an average of five calls per day in October including those relayed to BFI by the Edina Recycling Office. Late Set -outs Residents sometimes call BFI on pickup day to report that their material was missed. The procedure for the drivers is to go back through the route to pick up these "misses." If the driver is certain the material was set out late, he picks up the recyclables and leaves a reminder of the pickup time. On the third or fourth such occurrence, the driver is not required to pick up "late set - outs," but is instructed to leave the reminder note. Telephone Courtesy Council Members have expressed concern about the manner in which their calls to BFI Recycling have been handled. These concerns were discussed in the meeting between City Staff and John Moreland. John will be attending the November 6.meeting to explain the measures BFI has taken to improve telephone courtesy. THE GOOD NEWS Our household recycling program is really catching on; participation and tonnage data show a steady rise. (See chart, page 3) Many residents have stated they are delighted with the new program. It's also been reported that residents who had said they would never bother with recycling are now, in fact, participating. The compost program has also been successful, even though Hennepin County has had problems in locating compost sites. Edina haulers reported 1,860 tons of yard waste collected for composting through August this year. The success of the program insures that Edina will receive the maximum 80% funding through the contract with Hennepin County for 1989. JC 11/2/89 EDINA RECYCLING TONNAGE AND PARTICIPATION 1989 MONTH PAPER GLASS METALS TOTAL WASTE WEEKLY TOTAL PARTIC. REDUCTION PARTICIPATION ESTIMATE JANUARY 85.64 26.47 3.04 115.15 7.0% FEBRUARY 69.60 18.60 2.05 90.25 5.1% MARCH 93.85 24.42 2.34 120.61 7.2% APRIL 99.14 20.12 26.25 145.51 8.7% v MAY 88.55 26.09 2 116.64 7.0% �n c� JUNE 91.61 23.69 2.52 117.82 7.0% `•"' JULY pickup 158.01 42.14 10.53 210.68 drop -off 31.82 8.47 1.07 41.36 total 252.04 15.0% 31.4% 40.8% AUGUST- pickup 188.12 50.17 12.54 250.83 drop -off 10.83 7.41 11.64 29.88 total 280.71 16.7% 48.6% 63.2% SEPTEMBER pickup 197.19 52.84 13.15 263.18 drop -off 21.28 2.81 .50 24.59 total 287.77 17.2% 58.3% 75.8% Jc 11/2/89 T Your participation in the Edina Recycling Program really makes a difference. You are conserving natural resources and energy, as well as saving future tax dollars. Just a reminder! Recycling containers must be visible from the street, but not on the curb. Please help us comply with the Edina City ordinance which states that neither garbage nor recycling should be on the curb. Only bags of compost material may be placed at the curb, for easy identification. Call the BFI Recycling hotline for any questions. or information: 7843262. lei A NeiyftftW Recyc" Program RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF STOREFRONT/YOUTH ACTION WHEREAS, Hennepin County is considering total elimination.of their support in the amount of $103,876 for Storefront/Youth Action's Youth Counseling Program, and WHEREAS, during 1989 to date the Youth Counseling Program has served 561 City of Edina youth and in 1989 has provided'over 4,000 hours of counseling and education to these young people and their families, and WHEREAS, there is no effective alternative service for these people, and WHEREAS, this type of early intervention in young lives actually saves in terms of human resources, as well as reducing future costs of law enforcement, chemical abuse treatment and institutional costs of Edina and to Hennepin County, and WHEREAS, discontinuing this service will ultimately result in substantial increases in human and financial costs to society; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina requests the Hennepin County Commissioners to continue to appropriate the current level of funding necessary to Storefront/Youth Action in 1990. ADOPTED this 6th day of November, 1989. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 6, 1989 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 7th day of November, 1989. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk O . RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF SOUTH HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES COUNCIL WHEREAS, the Hennepin County 1990 proposed budget eliminates all funding for Community Planning and Coordination and Citizen Participation Process to the Human Services Councils, including South Hennepin Human Services Council ( SHHSC); and WHEREAS, elimination of these funds will significantly impair the function of SHHSC which is the sole entity charged with responsibility of human services planning and coordination between and amount the four cities in the South Hennepin area; and WHEREAS, elimination of these funds will totally dissolve the formal process for solicitation of citizen input as to guidelines to determine priorities in area human service funding; and WHEREAS, SHHSC has in the past shown itself to play an important and beneficial role in human services and development and delivery; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina requests the Hennepin County Commissioners to continue to appropriate the current level of funding necessary to SHHSC in 1990. ADOPTED this 6th day of November, 1989. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 6, 1989 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 7th day of November, 1989. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk • October 16, 1989 Dear %� r't Agenda Item VIII.B STOREFRONT/YOUTH ACTION Administrative Offices 4570 W. 77th St., Suite 198. Edina, MN 55435 (612) 830.1331 I'm writing to you because I'm very concerned.about the future of .our agency's ability to provide services for t)►e young people of our community., You may be unaware that the levy limits placed on Hennepin County as a result of the special session tax bill are below those of 1989, As a result, the county has been forced to cut its budget of community services. As and has chosen to take huge hunk out it is now, we are afraid the county n►ay cut all we its funding to the Youth Counseling Program of SYA. That means ge ncy effectively will lose $103,876. It will be in►))ossible to operate our age with that kind of loss. Tile county is being forced to make decisions and the only way to impact that decision - making process is for everyone who supports our agency to let the County Commissioners know how valuable we are to the suburban youth. 1 have enclosed a list of the County Couunissioners, their phone numbers, and addresses. I have also enclosed a sample letter. I urge you on behalf of tl►e youth of our community to let the Commissioners know how you feel about the continued county support for our agency. Please write or call now. This is urgent. Decisions will be made by the first week in November. Thank you so very much. Sincerely, F Mary Ellen Harris Executive Director Storefront /Youth Action h284ab STOREFRONT /YOUTH ACTION 4570 West 77th Street, Suite 198 7145 Harriet Avenue South Edina, MN 55435 Richfield, MN 55423 (612) B30 -1331 (612) 861 -1675 4570 West 77th Street, Suite 198 Edina, MN 55435 (612) 830 -1432 PROJECT CHARLIE 1001 Highway q7 Hopkins, MN 55343 (612) 938 - 7040,;;, -w,� DELTA PLACE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER w Y O U R L E T T E R H E A D Dear Commissioner, Storefront /Youth Action has been one of the only sources of help for suburban children for the past 17 years. The agency has been funded by various factions of the community through a cooperative effort. We realize that troubled youth are the responsibility of everyone and their problems are the responsibility of everyone and their problems impact not just one segment, but all segments of the community. Today, more than ever, with rising suicide rates, victimization of children and drug and alcohol abuse, our parents,'schools and police departments need the help and advice the trained professionals of SYA can provide. We need Storefront /Youth Action, and we cannot support this agency without the help from Hennepin County. Please continue your support for Storefront /Youth Action. It is vitally important to the ,young people of YOUR CITY OR SCHOOL SYSTEM. Sincerely, YOUR NAME YOUR TITLE h284ac District Commissioner Phone Number 1st Jeff Spartz 348 -3085 2nd Randy Johnson 348 -3088 3rd John Keefe 348 -3087 4th John E. Denis 348 -3086 5th Tad Jude 348 -3084 6th Sam S. Sivanich 348 -3082 7th Mark C. Andrew 348 -3080 A -2400 Government Center Minneapolis, MN 55487 91 A. �r\ o e� • ,�RPOM�t'O • REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & Council Members Agenda Item # yIII.C. From: Kenneth Rosland Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: November 3, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: SHHSC AND FUNDING FROM 0 To Council HENNEPIN COUNTY Action ❑Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: That the attached resolution be adopted, requesting the Hennepin County Commissioners to continue to appropriate the current level of funding necessary to South Hennepin in 1990. Info /Background: See attached fact sheet Sample Resolution In Support of South Hennepin Human Services Council WHEREAS, the Hennepin County 1990 proposed budget eliminates all funding for Community Planning and Coordination and Citizen - -Participation Process to the Human Services Councils including South Hennepin Human Services Council ( SHHSC) and WHEREAS, elimination of these funds will significantly impair the function of SHHSC which is the sole entity charged with the responsibility of human services planning and coordination between and among the 4 cities in the South Hennepin area, and WHEREAS, elimination of these funds will totally dissolve the formal process for solicitation of citizen input as to guidelines to determine priorities in area human service funding, and WHEREAS, SHHSC has in the past shown itself to play an important and beneficial role in human services development and delivery by spearheading such efforts as: - Shared Transportation Program - SHAVR - Connection South - Surplus Food - Emergency Assistance Program - Teen Pregnancy Prevention - South Hennepin Family and Childrens Service - Food & Nutrition Program - Parenting Handbook Development - Comprehensive Study of Human Services in South Hennepin - Housing Assistance Program — Energy Assistance Program - 1989 Long Range Plan - First Call For Help -South - HOME - Charaka - Synergy South - Learning Exchange — Project CHarlie - Family Violence - Project I CAN- Latchkey - Suburban Housing Collaborative - Mental Health Advisory Committee - Mini Directory of Human Services in South Hennepin - Human Services Center THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City of requests the Hennepin County Commissioners to continue to appropriate the current level of funding necessary to SHHSC in 1990. Signature Date SHHSC SOUTH HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES COUNCIL Bloomington • Eden Prairie • Edina • Richfield South Hennepin Human Services Council 1990 Hennepin County Proposed Budget Cuts Planning and Coordination SHHSC: $57,594 All three suburban Human Service Councils: $172,782 JUSTIFICATION FOR RECOMMENDATION The funds, which are provided to the three suburban Human Services Councils for the purpose of provid- ing community planning on a more extensive basis than is the case for the five city Human Services Councils (which receive money only for citizens participation efforts), would be eliminated. Addi- tional funding for the suburban Councils' operations could be sought from the cities which established the Councils via joint powers agreements or from the suburban Community Action Agency (CASH). What these cuts mean: Citizen Participation: SHHSC: $12,769 All eight Human Service Councils: $102,152 JUSTIFICATION FOR RECOMMENDATION: The current mechanism (i.e., eight Human Serv- ice Councils) for soliciting recommendations relative to service needs and priorities, as required by CSSA and Adult Mental Health Act/Chil- dren's Mental Health Act, would be eliminated. To be in compliance with statutory requirements, other mechanisms would need to be created to provide this input. Department visibility, com- munication, "bridges," etc., to various commu- nity groups, organizations, etc., as facilitated through the Human Services Councils, would be reduced. * suburbs will lose their on -going voice in planning for their community's human service needs. * almost 70% of the proposed cuts involve contracted agencies. (Services in the South Hennepin area are provided primarily through these contracted agencies.) * 16,000 Hennepin County residents will lose vital human services in 1990. * all of the cuts hit hard at services for children, families, people with disabilities and frail elderly people. Some examples include: • over 1,000 children will be put at increased risk of abuse due to elimination of crisis intervention services. • over 3,500 troubled teenagers will lose the people who run interference against daily real life risks of drug abuse, pregnancy, contracting AIDS, committing crimes and even suicide. over 5,000 suburban families stand to lose critical services that can mean the difference between a temporary setback ( a lost job, an injury or marriage problems), and a nightmare (divorce, long -term unemployment and homelessness.) • over 2,500 vulnerable people with disabilities may lose the critical support that enables them to have jobs, to live in and be contributing members of the community. * other agencies, such as United Way and CASH, are not in a position to financially make up the difference in funding caused by the budget cuts. o (n • � ~�'bRPOMS�J • lase REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER Agenda Item # VIII.F From: CRAIG SWANSON, CHIEF OF Consent ❑ POLICE Information Only Fx] Date: NOVEMBER 3, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: PRIVATE FUNDING OF ❑ To Council PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES Action ❑Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Info /Background: Information for discussion purposes is attached. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Appropriateness of Private Funding of a Public Safety Service Facts and Assumptions: Public safety services are traditionally funded through taxes and the General Fund. The Center Companies, management of Southdale, is currently proposing to fund one (1) police officer who would be assigned to the Center. The Center generates a great number of police calls and this officer's work would offset the responses of the normally- assigned zone officer. The proposed officer's total hours of work would equal approximately one -half the number of hours the Center is open. Increasing numbers of calls for service can be anticipated due to Southdale's growth and self- initiated activity of the officer. Discussion and Conclusions: The addition of the proposed officer fits with plans to add police personnel due to the growth of Southdale, Edinborough and Centennial Lakes. The private entity's motivation to fund the position is unclear, but may be related to incidental benefits of having an officer in Southdale. The high visibility of the officer, the immediate response, and other-officers frequenting the Center are likely "spin - offs." Critics of such a proposal that might claim "money" can buy "services" can be answered in a factual and logical way. The proposal does not directly increase the level of service to Southdale. The proposal adds to the personnel resource by adding one officer. This addition offsets work now done by others and the offset time can be applied to the balance of the community. The unresolved question about the proposal revolves around the word "privatize." Literally, privatize means moving responsibility from public to private interest. Broadly, one might suggest that the movement of financial responsibility would qualify. If the proposal is adopted, a new service delivery model will be developed. An operating level partnership will be created and Southdale's expectations for police response will be dramatically increased. This increase will likely place more demands on the Police Department. The provision for two officers would support the increased expectation and the partnership that would develop. Recommendations: Continued analysis and negotiation should be the first action. The Center Companies should be encouraged to consider funding two (2) officers. In lieu of that, Southdale can hire part -time officers to provide police visibility. The shift from public to private funding should only be done on an informed basis due to the expectations created. If the current proposal is accepted, the Police Department should totally manage the officer and assignment. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager FROM: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Appropriateness of Private Funding of a Public Safety Service DATE: October 31, 1989 Problem: Should government allow private funding of services with the implied delivery of a higher level of service to the entity providing the monetary resource? Facts: Public safety services are traditionally provided by government to the community as a whole. Funding is derived primarily from taxes and resources are spread or assigned_by government at its discretion. Private funding of services 'is not typical in public safety. If it were to occur, there is an implied contract to deliver a higher level of service to the funder. Police have contracted for service to private funding through the limited hiring of part - time, off -duty police officers. This is usually done by commercial interests for additional security during special events. Governmental entities, such as a small city, may contract with another government, such as a county, for police,services. This is usually on a long -term basis and fulfills a governmental responsibility of a city. One example of private funding for the exclusive services of a police officer was found. The City of Bloomington and the Southtown Shopping Center, a private interest, contracted for a three -year period. The officer worked exclusively within the Center as a traditional "beat" officer for the purpose of security and law enforcement. Uniformed private security replaced the use of an officer and continues as the current practice. The proposal at hand includes the funding of salary and benefits of one police officer by The Center Companies. This $35,000- $40,000 would theoretically Kenneth E. Rosland Page 2 October 31, 1989 offset the costs for the City of Edina to assign one (1) officer to Southdale Center. Southdale is a regional shopping center generating a high number of calls for police service. A large number of these calls include arrests and other highly time - consuming responses. As much as 15% of the entire Police Department's workload is generated by the Southdale area. Southdale Security is a proprietor- managed security force working within the Center. Its operation is effective and efficient. It performs a wide range of activity ranging from information and service functions through enforcing Center rules and enforcing law. Southdale Security's members are uniformed, unarmed, well- equipped, and well- trained. Since the Center opened in 1956, there has been a high level of cooperation between Southdale Security and the Edina Police Department. Typically, Southdale Security responds to the majority of calls for service in the Center. They handle most of these without Police Department assistance. However, in the case of emergencies, arrests, disturbances, or wherever conflicts arise, the Police Department is summoned. When the Police Department responds, a record of that response is documented. The Police Department does not maintain records of the thousands of unassisted Southdale Security responses. Currently, the police response comes from a police unit assigned to a geographical area which includes Southdale. This area is most easily described as Edina's "southeast quadrant." Because of the workload from Southdale, multiple police units are assigned to the quadrant when resources permit. Projections of numbers of calls, day of week, and time of day can be made. Additional resources would be assigned against these projections. The workload can be described, but it cannot be managed given the reactive nature of police work. Assumption: An additional privately- funded police officer could be assigned against the projection of calls for service and could respond to the majority of those calls during the time the officer is working. The Kenneth E. Rosland Page 3 October 31, 1989 officer's hours in the Center would amount to approximately one -half of the total hours the Center is open for business. A very optimistic estimate of the percentage of calls the officer would be able to handle, or displace from the current zone car response, is 30 -35 %. This translates to approximately 5% of the total police calls for service. Adding an officer under current assignment practices would establish a workload for that officer of approximately 2.5% of the total calls for service. An officer assigned within Southdale would decrease the number of times a zone officer would be summoned to the Center. Theoretically, that zone officer would then spend greater time serving the balance of the "southeast quadrant." An officer assigned specifically to Southdale would also generate additional calls over and above normal reporting. His presence, contact with people and day -to -day activity would generate reports, incidents and arrests. Discussion: The facts and assumptions support the position that Southdale is a very busy place, is given a great deal of police attention, and an additional officer could offset current and future demands. The question then becomes, Does an additional officer fit into current plans ?, What would motivate a private entity to fund such.a project ?, Should a higher level of service be "sold" in this and other instances?; and Should efforts to privatize service be encouraged or abandoned? Does an additional officer fit into. current plans? A 1987 -88 study by the Police Department attempted to identify growth in the southeast quadrant in light of Edinborough, Centennial Lakes, and Southdale expansion. -In order to maintain the current level of service, given the projections, five (5) additional police officers would need to be added. In 1988, one officer was added to the authorized strength via the normal budget process. The proposed officer, privately funded, would contribute to the total of five and would offset some of the projected increased workload. �1 Kenneth E. Rosland Page 4 October 31, 1989 - Why does a private entity offer such a proposal? Southdale Security, over the last several years, has requested the assignment of officers to a precinct -like office provided at the Center. A 1970's project, called the Commercial Area Patrol, proved successful in responding quickly and effectively to Southdale's crime and calls for service. This project was abandoned due to the difficulty in supervising its operation and increasing demands in the southeast quadrant, outside of the Center. 1989 discussions with Southdale Security ended with the thought of giving consideration to such an assignment conditional on the private interest paying for the officer, hence, the proposal at hand. The.most identifiable benefit to Southdale with such an assignment would be the immediate availability and high visibility of the officer. Beyond that are indirect benefits that might be even more significant. Southdale Security might be able to reduce their workload given the officer's presence. The officer's timely response may also be an excellent "risk reduction" technique for Southdale Security putting an officer on the scene of an arrest or confrontation as a first responder rather than follow -up. And, if one officer is assigned there, the likelihood is other on -duty officers will frequent the Center on a social /official basis. Lastly, should the project be successful and the Department become dependent on such an assignment, private funds might be withdrawn. This would then provide the continuing benefit to the Center without the cost. - Should public safety services be contracted to private interests? This may be the focal question of this discussion. It may provide the basis for criticism or it could be a progressive step in public safety funding. As discussed above, public safety services are already contracted to private entities. It is Kenneth E. Rosland Page 5 October 31, 1989 typically part -time and of a short duration. A full -time, long -term commitment would be a departure from that norm. A possible way of analyzing this question may be ,relating to the question of need. Does the southeast quadrant, in general, and the Southdale Center, specifically, need additional police service? If this is answered in the affirmative, the question of'who pays for it has less magnitude. All the.analysis indicates that there is a present and future need for additional police service.to Southdale Center. The proposal addresses that need and may be an anticipatory step by the Center to assure they are included in proposed expansion. Detractors of the proposal might allude to the fact that "money" can buy "services" and those unable to pay would be disadvantaged. This argument might be true if there would be an across- the -board increase in level of service and those not paying would not benefit by that increase. This proposal appears to respond to a level of resources question rather than a level of service question. The proposal adds resources, albeit to a specific location, not the level of service or doing more things at Southdale. In effect, the proposal substitutes an officer in the Center for the one that would normally be called to the Center. Theoretically, this officer can then be applied against other community needs. - Should efforts to privatize services be continued? The focal issue relating to contracting services has been discussed above and conclusions can be made. What remains is the answer to the basic philosophical question underlying the proposal. That question centers around the word "privatize." Privatize is defined as "To alter the status (as in business and industry) from public to private control or ownership." The operating style of the Edina Police Department aver the last ten (10) years has been to do exactly that. Business, especially, has-been encouraged to provide their own security, pay for alarm responses, follow up on bad checks, and generally manage their own safety and security matters. Had this not been the Department's style, Kenneth E. Rosland Page 6 ° October 31, 1989 calls for service would be much higher than current numbers. The proposal at hand does not privatize safety and security for the private sector. In fact, it may do the exact opposite. By contracting with private interests, government is drawn into a partnership regarding safety and security. Such partnerships may be excellent at the planning and coordinating level, but may be out of place at the operational or service delivery level. Conclusions: Southdale Center has a long history of requesting and obtaining a high number of responses to calls for service. This volume currently demands a significant percentage of the police resource serving the entire City. The current proposal is to add one (1) officer to the Police Department that would be financially supported by the Center. This officer would be assigned within the Center to respond to calls for service. This officer's workload would offset that of the normally- assigned zone officer. The reasons for the proposal and the costs associated with it are not clear. It may be a gesture on the part of the Center to establish itself in future planning. . One assigned officer would be insufficient with the enhanced expectation created for Southdale. Also, additional stores planned in the Center and the work the officer would self- initiate calls for the assignment of two (2) officers. This would approximately equalize the number of work hours to the hours the Center is open for business. The proposal does fit into future planning. In this case, private funding would be used to increase the police resource rather than increasing the level of service to the Center. Given the need, the fact that a level of service is not at issue, and the offset resource will be at work in the rest of the community, detractors or critics can be answered. Acceptance and implementation of the proposal would appear to be a logical step given the results, regardless of the reasons for the private entity's funding. Kenneth E. Rosland Page 7 October 31, 1989 On the other hand, efforts to privatize certain public safety services are contradicted. A service delivery model would be established in the area of safety and security that can only lead too even greater demands on the Police Department. Recommendations: The proposal should be analyzed fully with further negotiation and discussion with the Center Companies. - The proposal should not be accepted in the presently communicated form. - The Center Companies should finance two (2) officers for assignment to Southdale. - The Center Companies should be offered the opportunity to secure part -time employment of police through the City if unable to reach an agreement on a formal proposal. The full -time employment of police officers should be dependent on monies derived from taxes or from the General Fund. The Center Companies should be offered the option of contributing to the General Fund to increase the police level of resource. - If the proposal is accepted and implemented, the below - listed conditions should prevail: - The Center Companies and the City of Edina enter into such agreement with no less than a three -year commitment on the part of both parties. The duties of the proposed officer should be spelled out to include a job description and minimum performance standards. - The officer's direction and supervision remain under the exclusive control of the City. Kenneth E. Rosland Page 8 October 31, 1989 - The staffing levels and work assignments of Southdale Security not decrease during the duration of the agreement. CRAIG SWANSON CHIEF OF POLICE CGS:nah e v �y •' Apo" ��G • Bass REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Roslarrl From: David A. Velde Date: November 6, 1989 Subject: 1990 -1991 Community Health Services Agreement with Hennepin Councy Recommendation: Agenda Item # VIII . G Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion IF Adopt a resolution to enter into an agreement with Hennepin County for Community Health Services subsidy for 1990 and 1991. Info /Background: The City of Edina is entitled to subsidy funds from the Minnesota Department of Health for the provision of Community Health Services in 1990 and 1991. These subsidy funds flow through Hennepin County. This agreement will facilitate the pass through of those funds. Edina will receive $115,793 in cash payment for 1990 and $119,573 in cash payment for 1991. Our subsidy cash payment for 1989 is $89,412.00. DAVID E. KRAUSE RONALD L. ROLLINS JAMES B. HOVLAND GEORGE E. ANTRIM, III RONALD D. OUSKY WILLIAM 5. BRANDT CAROLYN J. T LEV15 PAT I-1 W. FRISCH Edina City City Hall Edina, MN Council 55436 Dear Council Members: Agenda Item IX.A KRAUSE 8 ROLLINS ATTORNEYS AT LAW 310 GROVELAND AVENUE MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55403 October 17, 1989 (612) 874 -8550 FAX (612) 874 -9362 My wife LaRae and I recently moved into a new home for us at 5201 Blake Road in Edina. Since our move -in, I have observed that in spite of the fact this is a residential neighborhood, cars travel on Blake Road at relatively high rates of speed generally in excess of the posted speed limit. These high vehicle speeds in a residential neighborhood create significant potential danger for both children and adult pedestrians. There are many children who routinely cross Blake Road to visit friends or catch the school bus. There are also numerous people who walk or run on the street for exercise (our end of the street does not have the new sidewalks.) The excessive speeds, I believe, result from the fact that there are no stop signs on Blake Road between Vernon Avenue and Interlachen Boulevard and most drivers accordingly treat the road as a minor highway. I think there is a solution to the problem short of constant police surveillance. If the Council would authorize the placement of stop signs at strategic locations on Blake Road such as at the intersections of Blake and Fox Meadow Lane and Blake and Knoll Drive plus place appropriate "stop ahead" signs preceding each stop sign, I believe it would help slow down the traffic on the street and decrease the danger to children and adults. This appears to be what the Council intended to accomplish on Gleason Road between the Crosstown and Braemar golf course and I believe similar action on Blake Road would create a much safer environment. Edina City Council Page 2 October 17, 1989 -- - -- - -- Please give this recommendation your collective thought at one of your upcoming meetings. I hope the Council will act favorably on this request. Thank you for your attention to th's matter. ' Respe 11 , ames Hovland JBH:st REPORT/RECOMMENDATION • • f��bnroW'tOO • �eae To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER Agenda Item # IX.B From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Consent ❑X Information Only ❑ Date: NOVEMBER 2, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: PETITION FOR ORNAMENTAL ❑ To Council STREET LIGHTS Action F x] Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: That the Council refer the petition for ornamental street lights for Eden Prairie Road to the Engineering Department for processing.. Info /Background: The attached petition was received from the property owners on Eden Prairie Road requesting ornamental street lights for the 6000 and 6100 blocks on Eden Prairie Road. August 8, 1989 City of Edina 4801 It'. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 �)DD /r/uloiie'--e� RE: PETITION FOR ADDITIONAL STREET LIGHTING ON THE 6,000 BLOCK OF EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD (Please check the appropriate box) 1-I0,�;E06JP;E4 NAME ADDRESS REQUEST LIGHTING DO NOT REQUEST ADDITIONAL LIGHTING l� August 8, 1989 City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 0.�,U �!6��pa Side RE: PETITION FOR ADDITIONAL STREET LIGHTING ON THE 6,x.00 BLOCK OF EDEN PRA RIE ROAD 1411I'le /fie 11 (ray tq (Please check the apprgpriate box) :IO,.EOWNE4 NAME ADDRESS REQUEST LIGHTING DO NOT REQUEST ADDITIONAL f'1 :T ITIO:' u -r,cET l.l%ii�`i ' DATED TO THE HOMORA31-E COUNCIL OF THE wry ry Or The undersigned being owners of not less than ;1,; in frontage of the real property.on the following *treets in said Cit Do8 bettireen and _ between _ and between and between and _.._ between and do hereby petition that said portion of said streets be i nproved by CC`;aST :UC T, ION OF STAI1DARD CITY STREET LIGHTS thereon, and that the cost .of said improvement be assessed against abutting property, as authorized by Chapter 33s, Laws of Minnesota, 1553, as amended. S I Gi;YMrURE 0Fk.'s ADD R ESIS _ DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY 16 17— f. Ll it �� RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota that it hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor and Clerk to execute Agreement No. A10779, between the County of Hennepin and the City of Edina, for the period of January 1, 1990 through December-31, 1991 for the purpose of providing Community Health Services in the City of Edina. ADOPTED this 6th day of November, 1989. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 6, 1989 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 7th day of November, 1989. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk .L O 4 Cn v �� �O •'N�bRPOM�O� �eee REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER Agenda Item # IX.0 From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Consent ❑X Information. Only ❑ Date: NOVEMBER 2, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: PETITION FOR ORNAMENTAL To Council - STREET LIGHTS Action F x� Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: That the Council refer the petitions for ornamental street lights for Delaney Boulevard to the Engineering Department for processing. Info /Background: The attached petitions were received from residents living between Cahill Road and Delaney Boulevard requesting that ornamental street lights be installed on Delaney between 73rd and 78th Streets. Mr. Obermeyer Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, Mn. 55424 Dear Sir: Enclosed are the names and addresses of 57 residnets living between Cahill and Dlaney Blvd. in the 7500 block. These persons are unanimous in their appeal that additional lighting be installed on Delaney between 73rd and \: 4 78th streets. Currently hte city has one streetNlong that 5 block stretch of pavement. Other neighboring residents will also be submitting similar requests. Yours truly, Mrs. Franci Coyle (Mary Jo) 7500 Cahill Rd., #309 Edina, Mn. tt435 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. July 8, 1989 There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1). 73rd and Dewey' -•Hill -Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3)• entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2�..entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. we are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 1% 1989• YXI would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. NAME: ADDRE-S 'I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd'and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1'). 73rd and Dewey.�Hill'Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2). entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return y� 989esponse to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by gu NAME: ADDRES I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. I do not think-it is necessary to have additional lighting on _S-, -y X 3 July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1). 73rd and Dewey',Hill- Road, 2) . Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2�. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989• NAME: I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on ADDRESS: July 8,, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1). 73rd and Dewey:.,Hi11-Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3)• entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill,'2�. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989• •I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. 'I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on -- Delaney Blvd._ NAME: ADDRESS: 1 July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1). 73rd and Dewey:.,Hill -Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new - lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2�. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989• NAME: I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. 'I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on DelaMBlvd- i,--"l�- �S: July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1). 73rd and Dewey.,..-Hill-Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2�* entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989• NAME: I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. 'I do not think it is necessary to Delaney Blvd. have additional lighting on ADnRESS : July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1�. 73rd and Dewey.-.,Hill-Road., 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2�. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989• NAME: ADDRES I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and,78th streets. 'I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1). 73rd and Dewey':,Hill -goad, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2�. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989- �I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd.. between 73rd and 78th streets. NAME: -I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. July 81 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1'$. 73rd and Dewey':,Hi11-Roads, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3)• entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to-West Dewey Hill, 2�. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989• I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. 'I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. NAME: � � 4- mot' ADDRESS: ;�-1 �, O' July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1'- 73rd and Dewey-!Hill -Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2(y0 entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989• �( I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. -I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. NAME: ADDRESS: July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1). 73rd and Dewey :Hill "Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2!. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 159 1989• I would like to see'additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets.' -I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD.. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1). 73rd and Dewey:-Hill-Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 21. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return 5yo 98rresponse August to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by NAME: I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. -I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. ME ADDRESS: July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd . that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: l). 73rd and Dewey-.eHill -Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3)• entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2�. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3) . entrance to 'Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989- I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. NAME: . //-/1. 4 � ADDRESS : S J �✓ �' �� ,��� D % July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. 'In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1�. 73rd and Dewey',Hill -goad, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 4. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are ask' g you to answer the following question san nett n yo response to dwood office or to Mary Co le 309 G, by 98 would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. NAME: 1ts� 1i ATIDR 11[� �.J S 7 -3 S July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1). 73rd and Dewey.Hill -Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2�. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989• NAME: I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city. engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney:. 1). 73rd and Dewey•.�Hill -Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2�'. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking- yo— u—bto--answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or�o Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989• V I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. -I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. ADDRESS : / July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1). 73rd and Dewey' -,Hill-Road,, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3)• entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2�-. entrance. to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989- NAME: I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. -I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on '� -I - - ___ Ol -, July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous reouests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1). 73rd and Dewey-Hill -goad, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2�. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 159 1989• ,2!cI would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. 'I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. NAME: L1/„` L 114-1 ADDRESS: July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1$. 73rd and Dewey.•Hill -Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes, We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to- West.Dewey Hill, 2'. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to,Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989• %C I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. -I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. NAME: // /,t, . ADDRESS: 7,5810 � A J /�/✓ .5 yes July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a.large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1). 73rd and Dewey'.!Hill- Road, 2) . Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2!,. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989• }L I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. --- between 73rd and 78th streets. I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. ( n NAME: ADDRESS: %•S"� U l.•-g July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING'- DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1). 73rd and Dewey.-.,Hill-Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2�. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989- I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets.. �I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. NAME: 7 c Yl� � = fo, 1 ►/ "4 - ; �� ADDRESS: July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1�-. 73rd and Dewey.-,,Hill-Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2�,. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and . 3). entrance to Windwood,'B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August.15, 1989- I would like to,see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on "-- Delaney Blvd. NAME: Ld July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1). 73rd and Dewey' -Hill -Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3)• entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance -to West Dewey Hill, 21�. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989. NAME: I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1'). 73rd and Dewey..- Hill-Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey.Hill, 2�. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989• 1 I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. -I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd.. _- NAME: ADDRESS: Ca L l I 9 July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney-Blvd- that additional lighting be.installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1). 73rd and Dewey.-.!Hill-Roads, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3)• entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2�. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. Tree are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989• I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. NAME: n ADDRESS: July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1�. 73rd and Dewey;Hill-Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989• I would like to see additional lighting installed,on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. J do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. ,_ ~ NAME: i ADDRESS: July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1$. 73rd and Dewey:.Hill-Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3)• entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to.West Dewey Hill, 2�. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989- V I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd_ . NAME: ADDRESS: 30 July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1'). 73rd and Dewey-Hill-Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2�. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989• I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. NAME: !" ADDRESS: r July.8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon,these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1$. 73rd and Dewey: -Hi11 -Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2,1-. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. 'We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989•- I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. etween 73rd and 78th streets. 'I do not think it is necessary -- Delaney Blvd. i NAME: ADDRESS have additional lighting on July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1). 73rd and Dewey'.,Hill Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2�* entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and reurnSyour response August to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by 4LI would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. 'I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. , NAME: ADDRESS: -�r� (2, Z- -cam July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd "and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order -to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney:. 1�. 73rd and Dewey:-Hill-Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2�-. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1969• � I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. NAME: ADDR 'I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. ESS: /,0 0 I 0 July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1�- 73rd and Dewey•Hill -goad, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2). entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, "309 C, by August 15, 1989• ✓ I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. "I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. &z�L NAME: / VIAd� `Z ADDRESS: L�ze�- 0 July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1). 73rd and Dewey.-Hill-Boad, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2�. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 159 1989• I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. 'I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. !- - - - -_.� NAME: ADDRESS: July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1$. 73rd and Dewey:.,Hill-Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3)• entrance to the Ponds Townhomes* We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 0. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 159 1989• , r I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. 'I do not think it is necessary to.have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1). 73rd and Dewey:.,Hill-&oad, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We'feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2�. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3),. entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. we are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989• lI would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. NAME: ADDRE S: ilfJ .S /rf. —cam July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1). 73rd and Dewey--Hill-Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2�. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. V,e are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989• I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. I do not Del 'y NAME: ADDRESS: it is necessary to have additional lighting on July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous reauests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1'). 73rd and Dewey:.•Hill-. Road, 2).- Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We .feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2�. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3) . entrance-to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 151 1989- I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. 'I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. NAME: ADDRESS: 7Tk , ce -,�-�1 G 2 /q 'd July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1). 73rd and Dewey:.-Hill-Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3)• entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2�. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989• would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. .I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. NAME: ADDRESS: r July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina.- In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1$. 73rd and Dewey-�Hill-Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3)• entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2�,. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Wi wood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989• I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. "I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. n �i NAME: ADDRESS: I x �. C /?I i July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1�,. 73rd and Dewey.,.!Hill -Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3)• entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2,�. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 1% 1989• NAME: ADDRES I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. I do not think it isrecessary to have additional lighting on July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1). 73rd and Dewey'.,Hi11-Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2�. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C,_ by August 15, 1989• x� I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. -I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. J NAME: i ADDRESS: -7-,n July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, ,the city engineer's office.needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1). 73rd and Dewey.,!Hill- Road, 2) . Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights.is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2'). entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989• �I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. NAME: ADDRESS: 7 5- (5 6 `(lT 7` H 1 July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1). 73rd and Dewey - Hill -Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3).-entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2�. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. Tr1e are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989• would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. NAME: ;1�-0. "I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents.. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1'). 73rd and Dewey:.Hill -Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2�. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989. I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. 'I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. NAME: �����h �C�c1„_�` ADDRESS: sc,— n STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. July 8, 1989 There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney.Blvd. that additional lighting be installed.between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1). 73rd and Dewey;. -Hill -Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2�* entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg.' We are asking you to an swer the following questions and return 5yo r response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, August by %�I would like'to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. . between 73rd and 78th streets. -I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. � n ( An .. , `JiMWPF� ,1) 1.a. AI July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1). 73rd and Dewey-.�Hill-Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2�,. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C,' by August 15, 1989• Y I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. I do not think it is necessary to have.additional lighting on Delaney} Blvd. NAME: ADDRESS: July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1�-. 73rd and Dewey!Hill -Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2!. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions ar.d return your response C. to the Windwood office.or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989• I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. -I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. 1-10 NAME: ADDRESS: July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests,,the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1). 73rd and Dewey.-.,Hill- Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance'to West Dewey Hill, 2,�. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return_ your response to the Windwood office or to Mary.Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989• /L I would like to see additional_ lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. ffirg 1-* 'I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. // A / STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. July 8, 1989 There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1'). 73rd and Dewey.,.- Hill Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3)• entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2�,. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking -you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989• I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. 'I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Del�afe� Blvd. ` NAME; J ) LJ�z-(A // /S. awl U ADDRESS : ��G� 909 -C-� � 1 July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1). 73rd and Dewey.-.,Hill-Road, 2). Long Brake Trail,.and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2)y. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989• X I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. 'I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. NAME: /,,(�c. ✓' .� l/ ADDRESS: July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents - living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1). 73rd and Dewey:.•Hill -Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance'to West Dewey Hill, 2�. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989. I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. 'I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. NAME: ADDRESS: July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1). 73rd and Dewey.-.-Hill-Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3)• entrance to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2). entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 159 1989• I would like to see additional.lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. I do not think it id necessary to have additional lighting on / Delane Blvd. 1. NAME: ADDRESS: U July 8, 1989 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to act upon these requests, the city engineers office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Currently there are only three street lights on Delaney: 1'). 73rd and Dewey..�Hill-Road, 2). Long Brake Trail, and 3). entrance,to the Ponds Townhomes. We feel the addition of at least 3 new lights is needed - 1). entrance to West Dewey Hill, 2.y. entrance to Windwood, A Bldg. and 3). entrance to Windwood, B Bldg. We are asking you to answer the following questions and return your response to the Windwood office or to Mary Jo Coyle, 309 C, by August 15, 1989• %o I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 73rd and 78th streets. I do not think it is necessary to have additional lighting on Delaney Blvd. NAME: ADDRESS: _ 751 I Y STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that Additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order to-act upon these requests, the.city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. ILL,, would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between . '73rd and 78th streets. Name: .Address: -1st"C9 Name: Addres Name: Address: Name: Address: Address: Name: Address: Name: L/ 0 Address: Name: 3 C3 Address: Name-./ -;—Zjl .Address: Name: Address: Name: Address: Copies should be sent to: Mr. Obermeyer Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th', St. Edina, Mn. 55424 STREET LIGHTING - DELANEY BLVD. There have been.numerous requests from residents living near Delaney Blvd. that additional lighting be installed between 73rd and 78th streets on Delaney by the city of Edina. In order tonact upon these requests, the city engineer's office needs to see a positive response from a large number of concerned residents. Name: I would like to see additional lighting installed on Delaney Blvd. between 7 -A-4 anA 7R +.h c +.rnP +.S _ AddressJl f^ GJa > / �'i i°11 �!��! "' ,r� ✓ .� .a , - Name: Address: Name:= Address: Name: Address: Name: Address: Name: .Address: Name: Address: Name: Address: Name: Address: Name: Address: Name: Address: Copies should be sent to: Mr. Obermeyer Edina City Hall 4801 50th St. Edina, Mn. 55424 Agenda Item IX.D OL CL, us WJL V—VIA- 46L y' a. - -,�;` 1 441- 9sE-5 League of Minnesota Cities October 20, 1989 183 University Ave. East St. Paul, MN 55101 -2526 (612) 227 -5600 (FAX: 221 -0986) Agenda Item XII.A TO: Mayors, Managers, and Clerks FROM: Donald A. Slater, Executive Director RE:' 1990 Proposed Legislative Policies and.Priorities I am very pleased to transmit to you a copy of the League of Minnesota Cities' 1990 Proposed Legislative Policies and Priorities These policies will be considered for final adoption by the membership at the League's Policy Adoption Meeting on November 16, 1989, at the Hotel Sofitel in Bloomington. An agenda and registration form are attached for your information. ""The League of Minnesota Cities owes a great debt to the dedicated city officials who worked as members of the League's policy committees on ;-`the 1990 legislative policies. They spent many hours developing this policy document. The Legislative Committee, which is comprised of the board of directors and each policy committee chair, reviewed and approved the committee's recommendations. The Legislative Committee sends the 1990 Proposed Policies and Priorities to the membership for their consideration. I strongly encourage your city to attend the Policy Adoption Meeting on November 16. The meeting begins with sessions on environmental issues (at 9:00 a.m.), open meeting law (at 9:45 a.m.), and property tax legislative issues (at 10:30.a.m.). Come to hear first hand from legislators what their plans will be for the 1990 session. The Policy Adoption Meeting will conclude with the policy adoption session which begins at 1:45 p.m. To register for the Policy Adoption Meeting, please return the attached registration form to the League of Minnesota Cities, c/o Finance Department, 183 University Avenue East, St. Paul, MN 55101. == OVER == 5_. League of Minnesota Cities Policy Adoption Meeting Thursday, November 16,1989 Hotel Sofitel, Minneapolis 8:00 a.m. Registration 12:011 -1:45 p.m. Lunch -- Transportation issues Hotel Sofitel, Minneapolis City: Commissioner Lcn Levine, Department of 9:00 -9:45 a.m. Environmental issues Transportation Title Address Zip Code Commissioner Gerald Willet, Pollution Control Registration per person: $25.00 Agency 2:00 -4:30 p.m. Adoption of LMC legislative policies Mike Robertson, Director, Office of Wastc Opening remarks -- Lh9C President Millie MacLeod, MAIL TO: League of Minnesota Cities Management Councilmember, Moorhead Minneapolis, MN 55435 -3899 November 16, 1989 Adoption of rules governing the policy adoption 9:45 -10:15 a.m. Open meeting lam- meeting Representing Mark Anf- mnson, Counscl, Minnesota Newspaper Consideration of proposed legislative policies and 65 + Tax Double (Two Peoplej Association priorities Senator Randy Peterson " 1. Development strategies / / / with: Month Uay Y.. Arrivd Date 2. Elections and ethics Check in time 3:00 p.m. Check out time 12:00 noon Phone: ( ) 3. General legislation and personnel 10:15 -10:30 a.m. Break 4. Land use, energy, environment, and transportation 10 :30 -11:45 a.m. Property tax issues 5. Revenue sources .' Due to the uncertainty in the property tax area, the G. Federal legislative Lcague is unable to provide tentative speakers for the Other business property tax issues session. Our goal is to have the chairs of the House and Senate Tax Committees. Adjournment * Invited to speak r LMC Policy Adoption Registration Form November 16, 1989 Hotel Sofitel, Minneapolis City: Contact Person: Telephone #i A.C. Name Title Address Zip Code Registration per person: $25.00 Make checks payable and MAIL TO: League of Minnesota Cities, 183 University Avenue East, St. Paul, MN 55101 Housing reservation form MAIL TO: League of Minnesota Cities 5601 W. 78th Street Policy Adoption Meeting Minneapolis, MN 55435 -3899 November 16, 1989 (612) 835 -1900 To insure space/rate availability, please respond prior to Name November 1, 1989. Representing Please specify: 65 + Tax Single (One Person) Address 65 + Tax Double (Two Peoplej City State Zip I will arrive after 4:00 p.m. Please guarantee the reservation / / / / with: Month Uay Y.. Arrivd Date a,.;.alr®. Momh Date Day D Y Ikpentve (Credit Card) Number and Expiration Date Check in time 3:00 p.m. Check out time 12:00 noon Phone: ( ) r League of Minnesota Cities 183 University Ave. East St. Paul, MN 55101 -2526 (612) 227 -5600 (FAX: 221 -0986) LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES POLICY ADOPTION MEETING RULES 1. Registration. Registration shall-remain open from the previously announced opening of conference registration until completion of policy adoption. 2.Voting Privileges. Only one delegate per city shall be permitted to vote on policy proposals,'priorities, or motions. Each current LMC member city shall designate one official as delegate (and may select another city official as an alternate) for voting purposes. Only those officials with voting cards: for their cities shall be eligible to vote. Possession of the voting card of the city and the signed voting card register shall be evidence that the holder of the voting card is the city's delegate for purposes of voting. 3., Committee Reports The.chair -or vice,chair of each .committee shall present the committee report and move adoption of-the policy statements. . -After adoption of policy language, the chair or vice chair shall move adoption of priority rankings. The chair shall place on the agenda for discussion, a proposal to make a substantive change in the language of a proposed policy, change a priority, or to take a position which the appropriate policy committee chair or representative states was not considered by the committee. The text of nonprocedural motions and amendments, other than changes in policy priorities, must be submitted in writing to the chair prior to debate. 4. Disputes Disputes regarding eligibility to vote shall be referred to the LMC General Counsel and may be appealed to the conference. Such reports or appeals shall be a special order of business and may be taken up at any time a new question (main motion) is in order. 5. Limits on Debate Each speaker shall be limited to three minutes on any debatable question. The chair may extend the debate limits in order to consider an issue if numerous delegates request to be heard on the issue. _= OVER =_ ,J A. Policy Adoption Meeting Rules (cont'd) 4 5. Limits on Debate (cont'd) The chair may reduce the time allotted for debate -in order to - complete policy adoption, but in no case shall the length of time be reduced to less than three minutes per side. 6. Parliamentary Procedure Precedence. The policy adoption process shall be governed by the LMC Constitution, these rules, and Roberts Rules of Order, Revised. The conference shall be its own judge of these rules and Roberts Rules of Order. Appeal of the Chair. Debate of the motion "appeal of.the ruling of the chair ", rule, #6 notwithstanding, shall be limited to two minutes by the appealer'and two minutes by the chair.. Either may designate another eligible voting delegate (or LMC officer or board member) to speak in his /her place. Changes. Motions to "rescind" and "reconsider" shall require a' two - thirds vote of delegates present and voting.. 7. "Number of "A" Prinrifiac A motion to change a proposed policy's priority to an "A" priority must also propose another "A" proposed policy, within that same section, to.be reduced below an "A" priority. The final number of "A" priority policies shall not exceed the number proposed to the conference by the Legislative Committee. L � o '� n Os ~, , H � o G ;.i, es" 1 ° o, 3 tl 0 ok e O 0 +.. - � �g o : ell A� ' h P " • ( ° � " - �:� - .. .. �, - '�� �I� „ as ot yy t _. � . J u• � b o wry. o •, OP ° 7 d ' r` League of Minnesota Cities General Policy Statement . One of the most important purposes of the League of Minnesota Cities is to serve as a vehicle through which cities can define common problems and develop policies and proposals to solve them. The League of Minnesota Cities represents 791 of Minnesota's 855 cities, 10 urban towns and 18 special districts. All sizes of communities are members (the largest non - member city has a population of 347) and each region of the state is fully represented. The policies that follow are basically directed at specific city issues. However, they are underpinned by two principles which guide the development of all League policies. Those principles are: L' Minnesota cities' need for a governmental system which allows sufficient flexibility and authority for cities to meet continuing and new challenges for governing our cities and providing our citizens with government services while at the same time protecting cities from unfunded or underfunded mandates, liability or other financial risk, and restrictions on local control; and 2. That though our system provides substantial independent authority for cities to govern and provide services, the financial and technical requirements for governing and providing services necessitate a continuing and strengthened partnership with federal, state, and local governments. This partnership particularly in the areas of finance, development, housing, environment, and transportation, is critical for the successful operation of Minnesota's cities and the well-being of city residents. Explanation of Priority Designations Priority designation of the policy is in parentheses at the end of the policy title. These priorities are reviewed by member cities at the League's policy adoption meeting. The priorities give additional guidance to the LMC board of directors and staff in implementing the League's legislative program. An "A" priority indicates a major issue where the League may introduce legislation or work actively with other groups to seek new laws and regulations, or to oppose proposals that would have a significant impact on the effective operation of cities. A "B" priority indicates items that are important to cities, but where the League might spend less time, unless the Legislature or other groups mounted a major effort to which LMC must respond. A "C" priority indicates items where the League would monitor the issue and respond only when other groups raise the issue. - i - TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Foreword.................... ............................... CommitteeMembers i 23 ........... ................:.............. iv Development Strategies • .. Veterans' Preference (B) ....................... DS -1. Tax Increment Financing (A) ...................... .��� Tort Liability and Insurance (B) DS -2. Job Impact Statements (A) ...................... 3 DS -3. Economic Development Authorities (B) ............... 4 DS -4. Housing (B) ....... ............................... 4 DS -5. Development.Financing (B) .......................... 5 DS -6. Year of the Cities (C) .............................. 6 DS -7. Municipal Service Districts (C) .................... 6 DS -8. Tax- Exempt Status of Land Cities Hold for Benefits(B) ..................................... Gopher State One- Call(B) ........................ DS -9. Development(C) .. ............................ Small Cities Community Development Block Grant 7 DS -10. Program(C) ..................................... Community Development Principles 8 35 36 (C) ............... 8 Elections and Ethics EE -1. Consolidated Local Government Elections (A) ........ 13 EE -2. Election Administrative Improvements (A) ........... 15 EE -3. Ethics in Government (B) 15 EE -4. Authority to Fill Vacancies by Appointment (B) ..... 17 EE -5. Campaign Financial Disclosure (B) .................. 18 EE -6. Mail -in Balloting (C) 18 EE -7. Voting Equipment (C) ...................... 18 EE -8. Recall of Local Elected Officials (C) .............. 19 EE -9. Initiative and Referendum (C) ...................... 19 EE -10. Optional Poll Hours (C) 20 EE -11. City Election Campaigns (C) ........................ 20 General Legislation and Personnel GLP -1. Minnesota Public Employment Labor Relations Act GLP -2. (PELRA) (A) . .• .............................. Local Government Pay Equity Act (A) 23 GLP -3.- ............ . Open Meetings (B) .................................... 24 GLP -4. • .. Veterans' Preference (B) ....................... 26 GLP -5. .��� Tort Liability and Insurance (B) 27 GLP -6. ................ Mandates (B) . 28 GLP -7. .................. ......... Public Contracting(B) ............. 30 GLP -8. ........... • Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) .�� 30 Benefits, Financing, and Administration (B) .... 32 GLP -9. Time and Distance Residency Requirements (B) ....... 33 GLP -10. Presumptions for Workers' Compensation GLP -11. Benefits(B) ..................................... Gopher State One- Call(B) ........................ 34 GLP -12. Employee Benefits Health Care (B) 35 GLP -13.. .................. One Class of Beer /Wine in Grocery Stores (B) ....... 35 36 GLP -14. Towing of Abandoned Vehicles (B) ................... GLP -15. Volunteer Fire Fighters (B) ........................ 36 37 -ii - GLP -16. Utility Service Territories (B) 37 GLP -17. Government Training Service Funding (C) 37 GLP -18. Firefighter Certification (C) 38 GLP -19. Military Leaves (C) 38 GLP -20. Joint Powers Act.(C) ...... 38 GLP -21* Cable Communications (C).,,,,,,,, ,, 39 GLP -22' State Licensing of Contractors (C) . 39 GLP -23. Local Police and Paid Fire Relief Associations (C).. 40 GLP -24. State Financing of the District Court System (C) 40 GLP -25. Social Investing (C) 41 Land Use, Energy, Environment, and Transportation Drug Abuse: Prevention and Assistance LUEET -1. Wastewater Treatment (A) ........... 45 LUEET -2. Solid and Hazardous Waste Management (A) ......... 46 LUEET -3. Transportation (A) ...... Federal /Local Fiscal • Relations ...... LUEET -4. Land Use, Zoning, Subdivision, • Planning,. and 49 Annexation (B) • 77 • • ........ LUEET -5. Ground and Surface WaterManagement(B) 52 .......... LUEET -6. Environmental Trust Fund (B) .................... 54 LUEET -7. Pesticides and Other Hazardous Materials .. (C) . . . 55 57 LUEET -8. Eminent Domain Law (C) .. ..... ...�..... .... Homelessness .........., LUEET -9. Energy Conservation (C) .......................... 58 /Housing Issues....•...... Federal Mandates ������������ .. ' 58 Revenue Sources Solid Waste Management .•.•��������� RS -1. Property Tax Reform (A) • FL -10. . ........... RS -2. Local Government Aid and State Fund' 63 Cities (A) • •Limits Refugee Assistance .................... RS -3. Elimination of Levy .(B) ............. 64. . RS -4. Truth in Taxation.(B) ••....... 65 RS -5. Sales and Motor Vehicle. Excise. Tax •Extension.(B) 67 .... RS -6. State Administrative Costs (B) .: ....... 68 ........... RS -7. Stability of State Revenues (B) ........... 68 .....���� RS -8. Sales Ratio Issues (B) ......... 69 ...... RS -9. License Fees (C) " " " 70 ,,,,,,,,,,,,;,,,��� RS -10. Service Fees for Government -Owned Property (C) ......, RS -11. State Audits and City Financial Reporting 71 Requirements . • • .......... RS-12. :Encouraging Improvements on Older Homestead 72 Properties (C) .... ............................... 72 Federal Legislative FL -1. Drug Abuse: Prevention and Assistance FL -2. ............... Transportation 75 FL -3. ...... Federal /Local Fiscal • Relations 76 FL -4. ...................... Rural Development 77 FL -5. .........................� Cable Television Regulation ....... .......... .... 80 FL -6. ......... ........ ' Housing Priorities 81 FL -7. ..... ...�..... .... Homelessness 82 FL -8. /Housing Issues....•...... Federal Mandates ������������ .. ' 84 FL -9. Solid Waste Management .•.•��������� 85 FL -10. Highway and Airport Trust• Funds.•����������� 86 FL -11. Refugee Assistance 87 .................................. ........................ 88 (The Federal Legislative policies do not have priorities listed because they are not prioritized.) - iii - LMC LEGISLATIVE POLICY COMMITTEE MEMBERS Development Strategies Steve Quam, Mayor, Richfield -- Chair Lorraine Hostetler, Councilmember, Anoka -- Vice Chair Richard Abraham, City Administrator, Lake City Thomas Anderson, Mayor, Medina Bonnie Balach, Mayor's Office, St. Paul ' Steven Boehlke, Mayor, Montevideo Chuck Canfield, Alderman, Rochester John Cashman, Councilmember, Owatonna Tom Dimond, Councilmember, St. Paul John Frohrip, HRA Executive Director, Sauk Rapids Tony Goddard, St. Paul Jane'Gordon, Councilmember, Minnetonka Doug Gregerson, Councilmember -, Montrose Glyn Huff, Building Inspector, St. Francis Stephan Jilk,,City Administrator, Rosemount Barry Johnson City Administrator, Woodbury Neil Johnson, Public Works Director, Brooklyn Park Andrea Kajer, Assistant State Liaison, Minneapolis Peggy Kelly, Councilmember, Edina Bill King, City Administrator, Waconia Doug Larson, Councilmember, Prior Lake Kevin Maas, Economic Development Director, Chaska Steven Mielke, Community Development Director, Hopkins Robert Museus, Clerk Administrator, Rushford John O'Rourke, Mayor, Austin Bruce Peterson, Community Development Director, Willmar Katie Pocras, Finance Director, Lexington Neil Ruddy, City Administrator, Redwood Falls Randall Schumacher, City Administrator, Lino Lakes Glenda Spiotta, City.Administrator, Carver Paul Steinman, Development Director, Big Lake David Thompson, Councilmember, Golden Valley Ken Tischart, Mayor, Red Lake Falls Craig Waldron, Community Development Director, Roseville Dan Weiss, Councilmember, St. Cloud Chuck Whiting, City Administrator, Janesville Joe Zak, Councilmember, Shakopee Elections and Ethics Karen Anderson, Councilmember, Minnetonka -- Chair Ruth Rasmussen, Councilmember, Austin -- Vice Chair Francene Clark, City Clerk, Mound Judith Cox, City Clerk, Shakopee Greg Engdahl, City Clerk, St. Cloud Carole Grimm, City Clerk, Rochester Evelyn Kjos, City Clerk, Burnsville Myrna Maikkula, City Clerk, Brooklyn Park Joyce Mercil, Director of Elections, Minneapolis Mary Mueller, City Clerk, Apple Valley - iv - LMC LEGISLATIVE POLICY COMMITTEE MEMBERS (cont'd) Elections and Ethics Elaine Niehoff, Councilmember, Melrose Doris Nivala, Administrator Clerk Treasurer, Ham Lake Al Olsen, City Clerk, St. Paul Jo -Anne Student, Council Secretary, Columbia Heights June Swanson, City Clerk, Clara City Eugene Van Overbeke, City Clerk Treasurer, Eagan Evelyn Woulfe, City Clerk, Bloomington General Legislation and Personnel Gary Bastian, Councilmember, Maplewood -- Chair Scott Larson, Clerk Administrator, Cambridge -- Vice Chair Dennis Bible, Director of Labor Relations, Minneapolis Lynn Boland, Personnel Director, Apple Valley Scott Botcher, City Administrator, Young America Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager, Plymouth Larry G. Buboltz, Mayor, Detroit Lakes Steven Devich, Administrative Services, Richfield Dan Donahue, City Manager, New Hope Jerry Dulgar, City Manager, Crystal Karl Frantz, City Administrator, Renville Jim Genellie, Assistant City Manager, Hopkins Ken Hartung, Assistant Administrator, Woodbury Patrick Hentges, City Administrator, Faribault Dick Hierstein, City Administrator, Owatonna Brian Holzer, Fire Chief, Burnsville Melvin Kilbo, Chief of Police, Orono Dianne Latuff, City Clerk, West St. Paul Sheryl Lee, Personnel Office, St. Paul Ed Meister, City Administrator, Lindstrom Orville Mertz, Fire Chief, Rochester Kent Michaelson, Personnel Director, Bloomington Ron Moorse, Adiminstrative Assistant, Roseville Mark Nagel, City Manager, Anoka Patrick Nasi, City Administrator, Annandale Rita Petkoff, Councilmember, Columbia Heights Marty Pinkney, Councilmember, Moorhead Kevin Raun Councilmember, Cottage Grove Mark Robertson, Assistant Personnel Director, St. Paul Robert Schaefer, City Administrator, Inver Grove Heights Ryan Schroeder, Assistant City Manager, Robbinsdale Robert Therres, City Administrator, Winnebago William Thompson, Fire Chief, Coon Rapids Jerry Wampach, Councilmember, Shakopee Gene White, Councilmember, Prior Lake Charles Winkelman, Council President, St. Cloud Betty Zachmann, Clerk Treasurer, Winsted a�� LMC.LEGISLATIVE POLICY COMMITTEE MEMBERS (cont'd) Land Use Ener Environment, and Transportation Dean Massett, Council Administrator, Red Wing -- Chair Barry Anderson, City Attorney, Hutchinson Lydia Andren, Mayor, Prior Lake .Bonnie Balach, Mayor's Office, St. Paul Bill Barnhart,'Local Liaison, Minneapolis Ron Batty, City Attorney, Medina Gary Berg, City of Cottage Grove, Brooklyn Park Jackie Carriere, Administrator Clerk, Montrose Rosemary Given - Amble; Councilmember, Bemidji Mark Grimes, Planning Director, Golden Valley Tom Halloran, Building Official, Rochester Tom Heenan, Health Director, Crystal Gordon Hydukovich, Community Development Director, Fergus Falls Curtis Jacobsen, City Administrator, Howard Lake Marvin Johnson, Mayor, Independence Mark Karnowski, Clerk Administrator, Chisago City Roger Knutson, City Attorney, Lakeville Larry Lee, Community Development Director, Bloomington Al Lovejoy, St. Paul Jean McConnell, Councilmemberr, Rochester Glenn Mckee, Councilmember, Burnsville John McLouth, Water Superintendent, Mora Michelle McPherson, Fridley Bruce Miller, City Administrator, Litchfield Craig Morris, Mayor, Lakeland Bruce Nelson, Executive Director, ALASD, Alexandria LaNelle Olsen, Councilmember, Northfield Gary Peterson, Mayor, Eden Prairie Jack Ross, Councilmember, Hibbing Steve Russell, Community Development Director, Stillwater Joel Schilling, Park Coordinator, Vadnais Heights Cynthia Seelhammer, Mayor's Office, St. Paul Ernie Seppi, Marshall Kathleen Sheran, Councilmember, Mankato Betty Sindt, Councilmember, Lakeville Eric Sorensen, City Manager, Winona Glenda Spiotta, City Administrator, Carver Donald L. Stewart, Thief River Falls Blair Tremere, Planning Director, Plymouth Katherine Trummer, Councilmember, South St. Paul Gloria Vierling, Councilmember, Shakopee Richard Waataja, Clerk Treasurer, Cook William Weiss, City Attorney; St. James Bernard Weitzman, Councilmember, Lilydale Chuck Wolden, Councilmember, Owatonna - vi - LMC LEGISLATIVE POLICY COMMITTEE MEMBERS (cont'd Revenue Sources =Liz Witt, Councilmember, Mendota Heights -- Chair Bob Filson, City Administrator, Mora -- Vice Chair Duke Addicks, Legislative Liaison, Minneapolis *Don Ashworth, City Manager, Chanhassen Larry Bakken, Councilmember, Golden Valley Linda Barton, City Managerr, Burnsville William Bassett, Manager, Mankato Mary Lou Beckman, Mayor, Lake City Larry Bethel, Administrator, Olivia Robert Bocwinski, City Manager, St. Paul Edward Burrell, Finance Director, Roseville John Craig, Mayor, Grand Rapids Charles Darth, Director of Intergovernment Relations, "Brooklyn Terry Dussault, Administrative Services, Blaine Walter Fehst, City Manager, Robbinsdale Henry Gredvig, Alderman, Crookston Robert Haarman, Administrator, Sauk Rapids Chris Hagelie, Administrator, St. Cloud Garrison Hale, City Administrator, Biwabik Barbara Irvine, Hanover Council, St. Michael Darrel Johnson, Finance Director, Winona Robert Johnson, City Administrator, Montgomery Donna Klay, City Clerk, Adrian Duane Knutson, Mayor, Fertile Mark Lenz, City Administrator, Mahtomedi Bob Long, Councilmember, St. Paul Timothy Madigan, City Manager, Waseca Paul McLaughlin, Council President, International Falls Lee Mehrkens, Management Analyst, Coon Rapids Thomas Melena, City Administrator, Apple Valley Michael Mornson, City Administrator, Big Lake Jim Nitchals, City Administrator, Fergus Falls Jim O'Leary, Mayor's Office, St. Paul Lyle Olson, Director of Administration, Bloomington Yvonne Prettner, Councilmember, Duluth Craig Rapp, City Manager, Hopkins Al Ringsmuth, Mayor, Waite Park Mark Sievert, City Administrator, St. James David Unmacht, City Manager, Prior Lake Dan Vogt, City Administrator, Brainerd Richard Waataja, Clerk Treasurer, Cook James Willis, City Manager, Plymouth Gary L. Word, City Administrator, South St. Paul - vii - Park LMC LEGISLATIVE POLICY COMMITTEE MEMBERS"(cont'd) Federal Legislative Peter Solinger, Councilmember, Rochester -- Chair Millie MacLeod, Councilmember, Moorhead -- Vice Chair Larry Bakken, Councilmember, Golden Valley Janel Bush, Federal Liaison, Minneapolis Steve Cramer, Councilmember, Minneapolis Dave Ellison, Assistant City Manager, Mankato Rob Grasslin, Administrative Aide, St. Cloud Jim Krautkremer, Mayor, Brooklyn Park Steve North, Assistant City Manager, Roseville Steve Perkins, City Administrator, Luverne Clarence Ranallo, Councilmember, St. Anthony Jim Scheibel, Councilmember, St. Paul Carol Scott, Councilmember, Prior Lake Cynthia Seelhammer, Mayor's Office,'St..Paul Tom Smith, City Coordinator; Becker - viii - League of Minnesota Cities 183 University Ave. East St. Paul, MN 55101 -2526 (612) 227 -5600 (FAX: 221.0986) DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES Policy Priority DS -1. Tax Increment Financing A DS -2. Job Impact Statements A DS -3. Economic Development Authorities B DS -4. Housing B DS -5. Development Financing B DS -6. Year of the Cities C DS -7. Municipal Service Districts C DS -8. Tax- exempt Status of Land Cities Hold for Development C DS -9. Small Cities Community Development Block Grant Program C DS 10.. Community Development Principles C - 1 - _e L.q I Ot • League of Minnesota Cities H 183 University Ave. East St. Paul, MN 55101 -2526 (612) 227 -5600 (FAX: 221.0986) DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES DS -1. Tax Increment Financing (A) The League supports continuation of tax increment finance (TIF) as a the cornerstone of redevelopment and economic development programs throughout Minnesota. The League opposes efforts to curtail and limit municipal TIF authority. Cities have the responsibility for the physical conditions and the development of the state's urbanized land. TIF is virtually the only tool available to cities for positive intervention to arrest the spread of blight and slums and encourage sound economic development. Moreover, since cities have the responsibility for preserving and maintaining the state's physical development, cities must have the ,authority for discharging that responsibility. TIF is indispensable to cities in order to execute that responsibility. TIF has permitted cities to plan and carry out housing and economic development projects on their own initiative. It represents the most feasible and effective legal strategy which is currently available to cities to,preserve and improve their physical and economic environment. In view of the dramatic reductions in federal assistance for development and housing, TIF remains one of the few options available for cities to promote growth and development in their cities. Should the Legislature decide that particular TIF practices should be modified, the League of Minnesota Cities is willing to work with the Legislature to develop proposals which will permit TIF to remain a viable development tool. DS -2. Job Impact Statements (A The League urges the Legislature not to add burdens which cities must face during the development process by mandating the re aration of a fob impact analysis in the event of Potential job dis lacement due to city land use controls or develo ment actions Cities also should not be charged with financial obligations for additional benefits for displaced workers because of zoning chan es or development actions - 3 - DS -2. Job Impact Statements (A) (cont'd) The state looks to cities to preserve and enhance the existing tax base and to-promote economic development by creating additional jobs. Further restrictions on cities' ability to initiate development • projects could jeopardize the state's economic vitality. Cities currently face substantial requirements of due process in order to execute development projects and to enact zoning changes. No legislation should be adopted to restrict or condition basic city land use controls in the zoning field. Land use control, through zoning, is an inherently basic city activity which has little or no relationship to the diminution of existing employment. Typically, zoning changes requiring the phasing out of outmoded land uses, grandfather the existing facilities. Legislation which could be interpretted to grant displacement benefits, only remotely arising out of the exercise of land use controls, would seriously undermine a city's ability to manage its physical environment responsibly. Displaced workers currently are entitled to relocation benefits and to fair compensation for the loss of property. Individuals losing employment receive unemployment compensation, as well as the opportunity for retraining and placement in new employment. DS -3. Economic Development Authorities (B) The League supports legislation which would provide city economic development authorities with the same power and authority as certain cities have received in s ecial port authority acts The League believes that it is unfair and unreasonable to grant greater authority and power to some cities in the economic development field and requests the following legislative changes: 1. Authorize all cities to designate economic development areas anywhere within their jurisdiction, not as .present law provides, requiring that economic development areas be contiguous and meet the tax increment finance (TIF) redevelopment /blighted area test; 2. Authorize the issuance of debt with respect to project activities within economic development districts without a referendum; 3. Authorize the economic development authority to build buildings or structures on land the authority owns. DS -4. Housing (B) The Lea support stock a ue,of Minnesota Cities urq for measure for enabling c d to finance new construct es iti ion - 4 - the Leq es to p of sin islature to reserve affo 1e and mul continue rdable housin 1- family DS -4. Housing (B) (cont'd) housing that meet local needs. The Legislature must also increase funding to aid cities to prevent the loss of federally subsidized units and to modernize publicly owned housina. Property tax relief for.low- income rental housing should be tied to agreements by developers and owners to maintain affordable rates to assure long -term availability of such units. The League agrees with the Legislative Auditor's office that changes in the state's role in housing require the Legislature to examine the mission and structure of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency in order to increase the participation of state and local government in response to changing demographic and economic conditions and Priorities for housing assistance. LMC congratulates the Governor's Commission on Affordable Housing and the 1989 Legislature for enacting many of the commission's priority recommendations. These will aid cities in providing affordable housing to first -time homebuyers as well as to low- and moderate - income residents. The League opposes any tightening of the housing impact and replacement mandates which were enacted by the 1989 Legislature. The League also opposes the extension of this mandate to all cities The legislation dictates-that cities are solely responsible for maintaining an adequate supply of affordable housing. Currently, public agencies acquire housing after extensive due process and are required to provide relocation benefits and assistance. The supply of affordable housing is subject to economic and demographic changes and market forces beyond the control of local government. Measures that require cities to replace such housing on a one - for -one basis unreasonably intrudes and hinders public improvements and stymies efforts to improve the local economy and increase the local standard of living. DS -5. Development Financing (B) The League supports the continued use of industrial development bonds and other tax - exempt instruments as development tools Tax- exempt financing allows cities to undertake a diverse range of activities to prevent economic deterioration, to attract new businesses and jobs, to retain existing businesses and jobs, and to maintain and strengthen the local tax base. Federal tax legislation has substantially changed the applicability of tax - exempt development financing. The League recommends the following principles. 1. Municipal retention of maximum of Minnesota tax - exempt development - 5 - DS -5. Development Financing (B) (cont'd) 2. Maintenance of local discretion and flexibility in development decisions; and 3. Minimization of state control of local development decisions. The League asks that the governor and Legislature involve the League in fashioning an equitable system. DS -6. Year of the Cities (C The League of Minnesota Cities supported the general goals of Governor Perpich's "Year of the Cities" proposals and supports extending these programs to all Minnesota cities. It is extremely important that all cities remain vital. The argument that the Greater Minnesota Corporation will answer the needs of rural Minnesota is inadequate. For instance, the Greater Minnesota Corporation's efforts at commercial, industrial, and agricultural activity in Greater Minnesota will not have a direct or significant impact on the problem of blighted housing.- To limit neighborhood revitalization efforts to only a few cities is inequitable. All cities-with problem neighborhoods should be eligible to develop programs and receive additional funding. The League strongly believes that the funding for new programs developed by the "Year of the Cities" proposal must not reduce or shift the state's current funding commitment to municipal programs. DS -7. Municipal Service Districts (C) The League supports legislation allowing cities to create municipal service districts. Cities should have authority to finance the types of improvements listed in M.S. 429.021 (relating to the construction, replacement, and maintenance of such things as streets, sidewalks, gutters, storm and sanitary sewers, waterworks systems, street lights, and public malls, parking, or courtyards) Both service charges and ad valorem property taxes should be available to finance services or capital improvements in the district. Court decisions concerning special assessments have made it even more difficult for cities to use special assessments to finance public services and improvements. The Minnesota Supreme Court has interpreted the Minnesota Constitution to require not only that a special assessment project "specially benefit" affected parcels of property, but also that the city be able to prove that the market value of a property will increase in direct relation to the amount of the special assessment applied to that property. - 6 - DS -7. Municipal Service Districts (C) (cont'd) This interpretation has created particular problems for several important city functions. First, it is more difficult to assess all . (or even part) of a capital improvement project to repair or replace, as opposed to newly built improvements. This hinders cities from meeting the widely recognized need for maintenance of the existing • public infrastructure. Second, cities' ability to finance annual operating and maintenance costs of some services to property through the use of special service charges is either unclear or non - existent under current law. The only current financing alternative to special assessments or service charges is the general property tax. But it may not be desirable to use the general property tax to finance some capital or operating expenses. For example, if a road is used almost exclusively by people living.in one corner of a city, it is bad public policy to require the cost of replacing that road be borne by all the property in the city. This'is especially true if the property in the rest of the city has already been assessed for similar improvements. Or, if the central business district or mall of a city benefits from more frequent snowplowing or street cleaning, better lighting, etc. it may not be good policy to have all the city taxpayers share in those expenses. DS -8. Tax - Exempt Status of Land Cities hold for Development (C) The League supports granting unlimited tax-exempt status to property cities and their political subdivisions hold for later resale to promote economic development. Until recently, almost all property political subdivisions owned was granted tax - exempt status. In 1979, the Legislature changed the law to provide that property a political subdivision of the state holds for later resale-for economic development purposes would be considered a public purpose, and therefore tax - exempt for a maximum period of three years. In 1984, the Legislature revised the statute, providing tax - exempt status for a period of eight years in most situations and granting an exemption for an unlimited period of years if the property is held for housing programs or is classified as "blighted land" under state law. The 1984 law provides that the property will be taxable if the city acquires the property for economic development purposes, and building or other improvements are constructed after acquisition of the property, and if more than one -half of the floor space of the buildings or improvements available for lease to or use by a private individual, corporation, or other entity is leased to, or otherwise used by, a private individual, corporation, or other entity. - 7 - DS -8. Tax - Exempt Status of Land Cities Hold for Development (C) cont'd The overall intent of the statute is to create an incentive for Political subdivisions to engage in economic development activities, as well.as to promote moving the property back onto the tax rolls. Unfortunately, it does not fully recognize that the process of developing industrial and economic growth, rehabilitating, or building housing may extend over a long period of time. The provision on improvements and leasing of one -half of the property discourages cities from being active in establishing and maintaining local development corporations, from retaining as much control as possible over their economic development and planning process, and from being selective as to the type of development which may occur in the city. Cities have every incentive to get property back on the tax rolls as soon as possible. Therefore, the League recommends deletion or clarification of the provision concerning one -half installation of improvements and removal the eight -year limit on tax - exempt status. DS -9. Small Cities Community Development Block Grant Program (C) The League supports the state's continued administration of the small cities portion of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. The League also supports the continuation of the set aside of federal funds for economic development grants and augmented state appropriations to supplement the federal funds set aside The League supports dealing with complex, s ecific ro ram criteria administratively rather than by statute The small cities CDBG program should continue as a source of funding which encourages cities to develop viable communities by providing decent housing and suitable living environments and expanding economic opportunities, principally for low- and moderate - income people. The state should maintain the CDBG program balance between cities' economic development needs and the needs of low- and moderate - income people. Cities should retain maximum flexibility in determining how to carry out CDBG program objectives. DS -10. Community Development' Principles (C The League supports legislation which continues state assistance to cities for communit and-economic develo ment. The ap ro riate state agencies should provide technical assistance to aid cities in promoting local development activities The State of Minnesota enacted major initiatives in the economic development field during the 1987 session of the Legislature. The state created a Greater Minnesota Corporation (GMC), expanded the 1 DS -10. Community Development Principles (C) (cont'd) authority of the community development division of the Department of Trade and Economic Development, and provided significant new funding for these activities. The legislation establishing these initiatives provides great flexibility to the state in implementing these new and expanded programs. The state faces many choices in bringing the programs into operation. The League encourages GMC to work closely with cities when developing and implementing GMC development programs. The cities of Minnesota urge the Legislature and the governor to recognize city governments as the foundation of economic development, and establish a partnership with cities in the mutual objective of improving and encouraging economic activities in Minnesota. Minnesota cities have traditionally been responsible for their own economic growth. During the 160s and 170s, cities promoted development through the use of industrial revenue bonds, tax increment financing (TIF), and housing (or mortgage revenue) bonds. Substantial federal grant programs supplemented local resources. The economic realities of the 1980s require even greater efforts by cities in community and economic development. As federal assistance disappears, cities are forced to become more creative in the use and leveraging of available resources. Community and economic development legislation should respond to the following concerns: 1. Protection of cities' ability to finance capital improvements; 2. Management of economic growth to maximize cities' existing capital investment; 3. Revitalization of cities reversing the trend of dispersion of population and economic activity; 4. Recognition and allowance for the great differences between cities, regarding.their stages of growth and development, demographics, and types of economic activity within and adjacent to their borders; and 5. Enabling the.Small Business Finance Agency to package projects, with local city council approval, into larger industrial revenue bonds. 183 University Ave. East St. Paul, MN 55101.2526 (612) 227.5600 (FAX: 221.0986) ELECTIONS AND ETHICS Po_ licy Priority EE -1. Consolidated Local Government Elections A EE -2. Election Administrative Improvements A EE -3. Ethics in Government B EE -4. Authority to Fill Vacancies by Appointment B EE -5. Campaign Financial Disclosure B EE -6. Mail -in Balloting C EE -7. Voting Equipment C EE -8. Recall of Local Elected Officials C EE -9. Initiative and Referendum C EE -10. Optional Poll Hours C EE -11. City Election Campaigns C - 11 - rt • ' League of Minnesota Cities 183 University Ave. East St. Paul, MN 55101 -2526 (612) 227.5600 (FAX: 221.0986) ELECTIONS AND ETHICS EE -1. Consolidated Local Government Elections (A The League urges the Legislature to resolve important election and voter participation issues before consolidating all local government elections. Unless such matters are addressed, cities have serious doubts about whether the changes that will result will benefit voters at the local level. City elections take on the particular character and outlook of the community. Local residents strongly identify with the local election process and campaigns for office. Before making radical changes in the nature, function, and dates of local elections, it is important for the Legislature to avoid lessening voter confidence and support for the current local election process. The following concerns must be addressed to assure that the integrity and effectiveness of the local election process is maintained: 1. Lack of conformance of school district boundaries with city jurisdictional and precinct boundaries; 2. Increase in city election costs as.a result of rescheduling of local government elections; 3. Expense and difficulties imposed by complexity of conducting consolidated local elections, including additional equipment, election judges, voter registration lists, and coordination and printing of multiple election ballots; 4. Authority to make final decisions regarding the conduct of consolidated elections, including such matters as: a. coordination of multiple ballot preparation and printing; b. machine testing and maintenance; C. location of polling places; d. election judge compensation; e. transport of election machines; f. form of voting to be used; - 13 - EE -1. Consolidated Local Government Elections (A) (cont'd g. recruitment and training of election judges; h. allocation of costs among jurisdictions for which elections are' to be held; i. option to hold special elections to fill vacancies, to resolve ballot questions, as well as for primaries, and for bond referenda. Cost sharing is already a concern for those cities faced with administering special school district excess levy or reverse referenda elections as a result of 1989 legislation. When school elections occur on the same date as city elections, serious questions regarding polling procedures and election preparations must be resolved. It is equally important for cities and school districts to reach agreements on the sharing of costs of such elections. It is not sufficient for school districts to be responsible only for the cost of printing school election ballots. There are substantial additional election costs that must be recognized as shared responsibilities of the affected election jurisdictions. It is equally important that any legislation calling for consolidation of local elections retain the option for cities to schedule special elections to fill vacancies in elective offices that occur early in the term at dates deemed appropriate at the local level. It is also unreasonable to restrict the scheduling of special elections on ballot questions or bond referenda to a single general election date. Cities must retain the authority to schedule balloting on such issues in response to local circumstances and the demands of the voters. Cities have opposed the designation of a statewide local election day because of concern about low voter turn -out, the potential for vote confusion and doubts about the fairness of the altered election process. The existence of overlapping election jurisdiction boundaries increases the likelihood of confusion resulting from the necessary changes in polling locations and the altering of precinct and election district lines. The impact of these changes on the voter must not be minimized. Voters could become discouraged and stay away from the polls rather than be forced to deal with changes imposed by statewide consolidation of all local elections. Although some cities are entirely located within one school district, numbers of school districts spread across more than 10 cities; many cover more than one county and numerous townships. Complications at local polling locations are likely to occur when consolidated elections are scheduled. In addition, election judge training will become more difficult, and the increase in their responsibilities is likely to discourage a number from agreeing to continue to service. Ballot rotation and coordination of multiple ballot formats will also increase ballot preparation and printing costs. - 14 - EE -2. Election Administrative Improvements (A The League supports legislation to improve the current election system. The League encourages the following improvements. 1. Public agencies must be required to provide handicapped accessible polling place facilities of sufficient size for voting at a location- separated from other unrelated ongoing building and program •activities; with direct entrance and exit for voters and available parking spaces close to the polling location to permit ease of access for voters. Polling places should be subject to the approval of the election administrator. 2. Election day registration and voting should be permitted but not mandated to take place in adjacent rooms. 3. Publicity and voter information should be made available to provide voters with a better understanding of the forms of identification required for election day registration. 4. Enforcement of state voter registration requirements should be made more effective by modifying those laws where necessary to reduce obstacles to prosecution of offenders, such as the reduction of penalties for election day infractions. (The severity of the current penalties constitutes a barrier to enforcement.) 5. Election judges should be permitted to initial absentee ballots prior to sending them out. 6. Write -in candidates with less than five percent of the total vote cast city -wide should not need to be listed on election returns. EE -3. Ethics In Government (B The League supports legislation that provides direction and guidance to cites in the adoption, compliance, and enforcement of statewide standards of ethical conduct for public officials and employees The League also supports retaining flexibility for cities to adopt their own statement of principles for upholding those standards of conduct at the local level. The League of Minnesota Cities supports a node of ethics for public officials and employees that assures that those entrusted to office at all levels of government are obligated to observe and abide by standards of ethical conduct in carrying out their responsibilities. - 15 - EE -3. Ethics in Government (B) (cont'd) If the Legislature decides to adopt a statewide policy on ethics for public officials, the League recommends that the following standards of ethical conduct be included in such requirements. For public officials in cities of 10,000 population or more: * Individual statement of economic interest which includes a list of direct and indirect personal interest in real property in the state valued at more than $2,500; as well as declaration of all partnership interests in real estate in Minnesota; * Disclosure of gifts valued at $50 or more from those with a financial interest in official city business. For public officials in cities of less than 10,000 population: * Individual statement of economic interest which includes only information on one's occupation and principal place of business along with disclosure of gifts valued at $50 or more from persons or concerns (other than one's immediate family) which have a financial interest in official city business. The Metropolitan Area Managers Association (MAMA) and the Minnesota Association of Urban Management Assistants (MAUMA) have also developed recommendations to cities for the adoption of local codes of ethics. Those recommendations are recognized as a useful resource by local officials. It is necessary to draw distinctions between the levels of responsibility in positions of public employment and to apply disclosure requirements and standards of conduct particularly to officials and employees who hold positions of responsibility in which they make final decisions on the expenditure of city funds. City officials have indicated their support of the following principles of ethical conduct and compliance with measures to avoid conflict of interest in the conduct of official public (city) responsibilities: * No special benefit, preference, advantage, or privilege of office or position; • No use of public funds, personnel, private gain; • No solicitation, acceptance, offer, performance of public duties; • No intentional use or disclosure of public position for private gain; • Submission of written statement on the presiding officer or immediate • Abstention.from influencing action potential conflict of interest. ` facilities, or equipment for or donation of compensation for information gained through potential conflict of interest to supervisor; or decision that involves a - 16 - . y EE -3. Ethics in Government (B) (cont'd Legislative proposals which seek to create an expanded role for the current Minnesota Ethical Practices Board have generally been received positively by cities, but officials caution that the rapid expansion of the duties and responsibilities of that agency may be too ambitious. It will require a substantial outlay of additional state " - appropriations to provide sufficient capabilities for the EPB to effectively implement and enforce the proposed reporting and legal activities that would be administered by the agency. Another means to establish adoption, observance, and enforcement of these measures would be to provide cities with direction and guidance in the adoption of local codes of ethics while reserving to the state the adoption of standards and disclosure requirements along with requirements for the conduct of public officials at the state level that can be enforced by a reconstituted Ethical Practices Board. EE -4. Authority to Fill Vacancies by Appointment lB The League urges the Legislature to retain the authority of city councils to fill vacancies in city elective office by appointment, in accordance with current state law. Legislation requiring cities to hold special elections for vacancies that occur prior to the opening of filings for the next city election is ill- advised, costly, and a serious intrusion-on local self - governance. Late in the 1989 Session, legislation was,introduced which would prohibit cities from making such appointments. Such restrictions would effectively undermine the ability of the city to maintain effective local government. City council, mayoral, or elected city clerk vacancies must be filled to assure a quorum can be maintained and to permit important decisions to be made in a timely manner. Current law requires cities to hold special elections to.fill council or mayoral vacancies that occur during the first two years of a four year term of office, but permits cities to determine the date of such elections. Other vacancies must be filled by election once the term of office expires for that office or when the city holds a special election. But, in all cases, the city is permitted to fill the position by appointment until an election can take place. The current statutory authority and election requirements should remain in place. There are also more than 130 standard plan cities in which the position of city clerk is an elective office. It would be irresponsible to require those cities to wait until the following November to fill vacancies in that position. Nearly 700 cities now hold elections in even - numbered years. To force an additional election in November of an odd - numbered year simply to fill a single vacancy would substantially add to local election costs, particularly in smaller cities. - 17 - EE -4. Authority to Fill Vacancies by Appointment (B) (cont'd If city officials determine that a special election is needed to fill the vacancy, current law permits those elections to be scheduled at the discretion of local officials who are closer to the situation and more likely to know the needs and wishes of the electorate. EE -5. Campaign Financial Disclosure (B) The Lea r+- c The secretary of state must be mindful of the importance of the timeliness of the availability of the certification forms for local candidate filing periods, particularly in odd - numbered election years.. It would also be helpful to clarify the authority of the'city election officer to refuse to issue a certificate of election to a candidate for city election who has won election but has refused to sign the certificate of compliance with state campaign financial reporting requirements. EE -6. Mail -in Ballotin (C) The League encourages mail -in balloting for non candidate elections and conqratulates the Legislature to make the process available as a permanent method of elections available to all cities It should not be necessary to require the county auditor to approve the decision of the city to hold such an election Notification of the election to the county auditor by the city should be sufficient While it is important for the county auditor to be informed in advance of scheduled city elections, the city council should be fully authorized to schedule such an election on a ballot question and to provide appropriate notice to the auditor as required for other local elections. Mail -in balloting has been successfully conducted in a number of cities in the past two years. Increased voter participation as well as cost- savings have been realized. EE -7. Voting-Equipment (C) The Leaque supports present law permitting a city the c tion of selecting which state approved equipment it determines will best suit its needs and opposes an state - mandated s stem of votin e ui menu. EE -7. Voting Equipment (C) (cont'd) The League supports protection of cities' investment in voting equipment. Certification of equipment should be thorough and provide an assurance that the equipment will be usable for a long period of time. The League opposes state- mandated changes to election laws that are of no benefit to city elections,_ that make equipment obsolete or costly to retrofit, or make elections difficult to administer. EE -8." Recall of Local Elected Officials (C) The League opposes state mandated recall of city elected officials Extending recall to all local governments is inappropriate and unnecessary because: 1. It is of limited usefulness.under the Constitution; and 2. Existing statutes which authorize removal from office of elected officials convicted of serious crimes essentially serve the same purpose as recall. The Minnesota Supreme Court has held that recall is a form of removal from office. Since.the Minnesota Constituion provides that officers may removed only for malfeasance or nonfeasance, recall can therefore only be used in those instances. Cities may adopt home rule charters and include recall provisions_; nearly half the home rule charter cities have _done so. - Because of constitutional restrictions, however, recall is rare. Further, where elected officials have been convicted of serious wrongdoing while holding office, cities have succeeded in declaring the office vacant under M.S. 351.02, thereby removing elected officials who have been convicted of a serious offense based on the failure to uphold their responsibility as a public officeholder. EE -9. Initiative and Referendum (C The League opposes state - mandated initiative and referendum legislation. There is no need for legislation to impose initiative and referendum. The law permits city residents to adopt a home rule charter to provide for it and enables them to adopt provisions to meet their needs. Where city voters have chosen not to establish initiative and referendum, the Legislature should not act to impose it. - 19 - EE -9. Initiative and Referendum (C) (cont'd) Two- thirds of cities with charters provide for initiative and referendum, with varying procedures. The Legislature should continue to allow city voters to decide whether to provide for such procedures. + EE -10. Optional Poll Hours (C) The League opposes current law that mandates all cities, regardless of their size, to have their polls open from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 .m., for state elections. Prior to 1983, cities under 1,000 population located outside the metropolitan area could, by resolution, fix the poll hours to begin no later than 9:00 a.m. for a state general election and to close no earlier than 5:00 p.m. for a state primary election. This flexibility would reduce costs for smaller cities. The League also supports legislation to authorize cities to set up their polling hours by referendum. EE -11. City Election Campaigns (C) The League supports income tax credits or deductions for contributions to city election campaigns. Candidates should be encouraged to seek broader backing from constituents. Providing income tax credits or permitting state income tax deductions should be permitted for city election campaigns. '' 0 L 6. League of Minnesota Cities 183 University Ave. East St. Paul, MN 55101 -2526 (612) 227.5600 (FAX: 221 -0986) GENERAL LEGISLATION AND PERSONNEL 0 Policy Priority GLP -1. Minnesota Public Employment Labor Relations - 21 - (PELRA) Act A GLP -2. Local Government Pay Equity Act A GLP -3. Open Meetings A GLP -4. Veterans' Preference B GLP -5. Tort Liability and Insurance B" GLP -6. Mandates B GLP -7. : Public Contracting B GLP -8. Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) Benefits, Financing, and Administration B GLP -9. Time and Distance Residency Requirements B GLP -10. Presumptions for Workers' Compensation Benefits B GLP -11. Gopher State One -Call B GLP -12. Employee Benefits Health Care B GLP -13. One Class of Beer /Wine in Grocery Stores B GLP -14. Towing of Abandoned Vehicles B GLP -15. Volunteer Fire Fighters B .GLP -16. Utility Service Territories B GLP -17. Government Training Service Funding C GLP -18. Firefighter Certification C GLP -19. Military Leaves C GLP -20. Joint Powers Act C GLP -21. Cable Communications C GLP -22. State Licensing of Contractors C GLP -23. Local Police and Paid Fire Relief Associations C GLP -24. State Financing of the District Court System C_ GLP -25. Social Investing C - 21 - ` League of Minnesota Cities Q 183 University Ave. East St. Paul, MN 55101.2526 (612) 227 -5600 (FAX: 221 -0986) GENERAL LEGISLATION AND PERSONNEL GLP -1. Minnesota Public Employment Labor Relations Act ( PELRA) (A) 1. The.League recommends that legislation be enacted that gives public employers the option of either requesting arbitration within a specific time or allowing essential employees to leqallv strike. Cities in Minnesota are very diverse in their public employment practices. Their ability to deal with employee strikes also varies greatly. The history of bargaining in the public sector has indicated that if cities are properly prepared, even strikes by "essential employees" may not unduly threaten public health and safety. In contrast, the prohibition of the right to strike has forced undue reliance on arbitration, which usually has resulted in large compensation awards to essential employees. . For these reasons, the League recommends that legislation be enacted that gives public employers the option of either requesting arbitration within a specific time or allowing essential employees to legally strike. Further, the League opposes considering any additional employee groups as essential employees. 2. The League recommends the Legislature authorize public employers to select item -by -item impasse arbitration as .a method of arbitration. Currently, state law provides that both parties to an interest arbitration can decide what type of arbitration they are submitting to, final offer item -by -item or final offer total package. Since the arbitration will inevitably involve public expenditures from state and local taxpayers, the wishes of the representatives of the taxpayers should be the sole determinant of the type of arbitration. 3. The Leagu definition of recommends that the than 100 days in a oyees covered k calendar year. Legislature reinstate the PELRA to people employed _previous for more The 1983 Legislature reduced the time period that part -time employees must be employed before they are considered employees covered by PELRA. This has resulted in higher wages for some part -time employees, and more significantly, has resulted in cities hiring fewer part -time employees. Additionally, many employees who view their work as temporary or transitory in nature, have been asked to pay their fair share of union dues, even though they receive no benefit from union membership. Experience with the law has indicated general dissatisfaction with the law by every affected party except unions representing primarily full -time employees. - 23 - GLP -1. Minnesota Public Employment Labor Relations Act PELRA A (cont'd) 4. The League opposes any changes in PELRA which would permit public employees to refuse to cross the picket lines of other city employees, or would change the definition of supervisory or confidential _employees. k Supervisors of public employees should have their management role acknowledged, and continue to have their status -limited so they may meet and confer. In no event should supervisory or confidential employees be represented by an employee organization which represents the employees they supervise. Further limitation of the definition of supervisory personnel would mean that in cities, except city manager cities, no employees could be considered to be supervisory employees for purposes of PELRA. GLP -2. Comparable Worth (A) The League supports the following statements 1. Changes in the comparable worth law should not occur until the current implementation deadline, December 31, 1991, has elapsed. 2. Prohibiting privatization or joint powers agreements for various services would endan services. er economic and efficient provision of ublic 3. Public a worth in the ncies should not be the vehicle to rivate sector through contract com 4. The Department of Em 1 establish an unbiased advi implement comparable liance requirements ee Relations should be directed to r council to review its com arable report files to identify statistically the nature and number of problems which exist in achievin state wid objectives Th1s data, coupled with public implementln comparable worth plans, will pr cooperative review by DOER and ublic agency for refinements to the com arable worth law . comparable worth agency ex erience in ovide the basis for es to determine the worth a need If the Le islature elects to chan a the law, it should use the followin uidelines 1. The approach to comparable worth should be com rehensive, dealing with all employees at all ranks re ardless of sex This is the only equitable approach. Comparable worth involves all employees, male and female, occupying all t public positions., True comparable worth implementation omust btherefore r include all male, female, and balanced job classes - -it is not• sufficient to concentrate on one class over another. 2. Arbitrators and negotiators should be required to follow e - 24 - GLP -2. Comparable Worth (A) (cont'd) comparable worth results for all employee groups. One of the primary obstacles blocking the implementation of comparable worth is the existing state statutes which define certain employees as essential and others as non - essential and require implementation of comparable worth to be collectively bargained. Essential employees do not have the right to strike, but may utilize binding arbitration. 'Arbitrators are not bound to consider the results of comparable worth studies. This creates a special class of employees with unique bargaining leverage. History demonstrates that this leverage has resulted in higher wages to essential employees than non - essential employees. This inequity must be discontinued in order for full implementation of comparable worth to occur. 3. There should be no limitation on the tools available to public agencies to implement comparable worth including accelerating or decelerating salary increases, job restructuring, privatization, or other strategies. 4. While primary consideration needs to be given to comparable job value, market conditions must also be considered. This is necessary both.to assure that municipalities are able to continue to recruit and retain qualified candidates and to assure that classifications similar to private sector jobs are not paid inordinately higher wages than those in the private sector. 5. Changes should not be considered which undermine pay for performance principles and in effect make pay for performance an exception which must be justified when used Pay for performance is an objective as fundamental as comparable worth. The objective should continue to be to pay individuals on the basis of their performance and work value. Instead, pay for performance should be the norm used for adjusting employee salaries. 6. Any definition of comparable worth implementation must recognize and accept as appropriate differences in employee pay occasioned by time in position, market, pay for performance principles, and contract settlements. It must also recognize and qive credit for good faith implementation efforts and the fact that comparable worth implementation is an ongoing effort Each time a salary changes, so too does the pay structure of the organization. Municipalities must therefore examine their pay plans regularly to assure that their pay plan and policies achieve comparable worth insofar as possible. 7. If a governmental unit can demonstrate a good faith effort and continued progress toward achievement of comparable worth, no penalty should be assessed. The Legislature in 1984 mandated that every local.government conduct a comparable worth study, report the results of its study to the state by October 1, 1985, and implement its plan for establishing equitable compensation relationships among female, male, and balanced classes of employees by October 1, 1987. The bill did not provide any specific penalties for not complying with the law. - 25 - GLP -2. Comparable Worth (A) (cont'd) By 1988, all cities which were required to report had filed their reports and many had implemented their plans to make the compensation' ' adjustments indicated by their studies. The costs of implementation have ranged from two to seven percent of payroll. Given the fact that ,. almost 70 percent of city budgets are for personnel compensation, this amount represents a significant financial impact. Continuing maintenance costs'will'also be substantial. The Legislature acted in 1988 to compel compliance for non - reporting jurisdictions by imposing a stricter levy limit on those communities which had not reported by- October 1, 1988, and also provided that cities and other local governments which do not complete implementation by December 31, 1991 will be penalized by having their local government aid reduced by five percent for each year they have not implemented their plan. It is anticipated that all cities will be able to meet the 1991 deadline if the Legislature refrains from imposing new requirements. As cities and other local governments seek to implement their plans, local public employees have many alternatives available to address any grievance they may have with local decisions, including local administrative appeals, arbitration, human rights actions and, ultimately, court actions. Although there has been no comprehensive or systematic,study undertake the Department of Employee Relations (DOER) has indicated that there is no widespread comparable worth implementation problems. However, this lack of demonstrated need has not dissuaded some individuals or groups from suggesting legislative action. The League feels that it is still premature to consider changes to the comparable worth law since many cities are in the midst of their phased implementation plans. If the Legislature, without the benefit of a detailed analysis of implementation results, acts to change existing rules, criteria, definitions, or imposes new mandates, additional confusion, expense, and delay will almost certainly result. For these reasons, the League opposes amendments to the comparable worth law until after the deadline for implementation and after an evaluation of implementation reports. Some amendments to other laws which affect implementation may, however, be necessary. GLP -3. Open Meetings (B) The League supports continuing the rule enunciated by the Supreme Court in the Annandale Advocate decision that meetin s of ublic bodies must be closed when data classified as other than public is to be discussed. - 26 - GLP -3. Open Meetings (B) (cont'd) For many years city and other local government officials were forced -to try to reconcile two conflicting statutes. The open meeting law specifies that almost all local government meetings.must be open to the public. At the same time, the data practices act specifically classified some information, such as information on public employees, as private and prohibited its dissemination. Faced with violating one or the other statute, city officials generally chose to violate the law with the lesser penalty, the open meeting law. The media usually reacted with complaining editorials and, in the case of the Annandale Advocate newspaper, with a lawsuit. The Minnesota Supreme Court in early 1989 finally resolved the conflict between the two laws by establishing a clear rule: when not public data comes before public bodies, either the data must not be released or the meeting must be closed. Media representatives immediately responded by offering proposed legislation which would have reversedAnnandale. The League is of the opinion that the rationale of theAnnandale decision is sound and that not public data should not change its classification simply because it is to be discussed at a council meeting or other government meeting. However, the League recognizes that some discussion of not public data is of substantial public interest, such as the discipline or discharge of public employees. The League believes that the Legislature should review the data practices act and modify it where necessary to provide that certain data is classified as public. GLP -4. Veterans' Preference lB 1. The League supports amending the veterans' preference act to provide that a veteran must select one and only one hearin procedure rather than be able to request both a veterans' reference hearing-and a grievance procedure under a collective bargaining agreement. Current statutes entitle a veteran to at least two different hearing procedures to challenge any disciplinary action. This is inefficient and may be unworkable, since the standards for court review of the decisions of veterans' preference boards and grievance arbitrators vary significantly. The Minnesota Supreme Court, has indicated that these statutes need to be amended. The law should provide for a selection of a single hearing procedure and eliminate any requirement for salary payment pending the hearing when the veteran does not request a hearing within 10 days or when an impartial hearing body determines that the dismissal was for just cause. - 27 - GLP -4. Veterans' Preference (B) (cont'd 2. The Lea followed by --- vvirlillG vi uiauii55at fjrac:ess, so LnaL an employee must provide notice of their intent to appeal within 10 days and the h-earing process must be completed no later than 90 days following a proposed disciplinary or dismissal action Currently an employee has 60 days from the date of the employer's notice of discipline or dismissal to request a hearing. If a hearing is requested, there are no time lines for holding hearings or rendering decisions. Under this.system, a termination decision can, and has, taken more than a year, during which the employee receives full pay and benefits. The result is extremely costly to cities, particularly small cities, which often must hire replacement workers for this period. The League's proposal to provide a more expedited process would not infringe on the employee's right'to a hearing, but would ensure a more efficient and cost - effective procedure. 3. The League supports clarifying the application of the veterans' preference discipline or dismissal process to honorably discharged veterans who have served active duty exceeding 180 days A recent court case raised the question-of whether the'law applies to all honorably discharged veterans or only to honorably discharged veterans who served at least 180 days. In that court case, an individual was honorably discharged from military service after less than one month. That individual was subsequently hired by a city. During his probationary period at the city, the city determined not to offer him a permanent position. He then claimed that since he was an honorably discharged veteran (albeit briefly), he was entitled to all _ notice, hearing, and appeal rights under-the veterans' preference act. If the intent of the law is to provide additional protection or rights to veterans because of their service to our country, then only those veterans whose service is sufficient to earn that right should be rewarded. The Legislature should act to clarify the law to apply only to honorably discharged veterans who have served at least 180 days. GLP -5. Tort Liability and Insurance (B) The Leacrue supports legislation reducing the exposure of cities to civil lawsuits without unduly restrictin an in ured art from recovering compensation from negligent individuals The Lea ue also supports actions ensuring the availability and affordability of insurance coverage for cities The growth of tort litigation over the past several years has resulted in increasing liability for governmental entities, private businesses, 1 1. GLP -5. Tort Liability and Insurance (B) (cont'd and individual citizens. Additionally,.business practices of insurance companies have played a significant role in insurance.pricing. The r League supports reasonable reforms addressing both sides of the liability insurance issue. The municipal tort liability act was enacted in 1963 to protect the public treasury, while giving citizens relief from the arbitrary, confusing,. and administratively expensive prior doctrine of sovereign immunity. The act has served that purpose well in the past. However, courts frequently forget or ignore the positive benefits secured to citizens as a result of the act, which includes liability exceptions and limitations. The special vulnerability of far -flung government operations to debilitating tort suits continues to require the existence of a tort claims act, applicable to local governments as well as the state. The League recommends the following. 1. Continuing our system of clearly defining and limiting the scope of public liability through legislation. The League strongly supports. retention of the dollar limitations on governmental liability. The current limits of $200,000/$600,000 should be reviewed periodically to ensure that those injured are not unfairly compensated and that the limits remain constitutional. The limits should be set at an amount that allows all levels of government to economically procure coverage. Additionally, the limits should conform to the extent possible.with. coverage limits available from insurers. 2. The League supports modifying state laws providing for punitive damages. Punitive damages, intended to punish and deter egregious conduct, have not been effective because the standards of applicability have been too vague. The League does not oppose the total elimination of punitive damages, but would prefer that the Legislature specify that punitive damages may be awarded only when the conduct involved manifests a malicious and flagrant indifference to safety, and place monetary limits on such awards or require payment of some of the damages awarded to the public, rather than to the plaintiff. 3. The League favors eliminating joint and several liability except in limited circumstances. The fault -based system of damage awards has apparently eroded. In -order to facilitate the return to a fault -based system, joint liability should be abolished in cases where defendants have not acted in concert, and a modified comparative fault system should be used to evaluate the actions of other individuals involved with the injury and assess damages only in proportion to the amount of each person's fault. At the very least, the Legislature should retain the 1986 modification to the comparative fault statute that eliminates joint liability for governmental defendants when they are less than 35 percent at fault. 4. In order to protect any enacted legislation from constitutional equal protection challenge, the Legislature should establish - 29 - GLP -5. Tort Liability and Insurance (B) (cont'd) rationales defining the problem and the intent of the Legislature. Further, all government entities should share the same exceptions and limitations in order to avoid an equal protection challenge. GLP -6. Mandates (B) The League opposes any additional mandates unless the Legislature provides adequate revenue sources to implement them. One of the most serious problems facing cities is the growth in the number and cost of federal and state - mandated programs, which substitute the judgments of Congress and the Legislature for local budget priorities. Recent examples of costly mandated programs include affirmative action, comparable worth, employee right to know, legal compliance audits, and newspaper publications. Special bills to address.this problem on an ad hoc basis have not provided a permanent or statewide solution to these problems. The League therefore supports the continuation and improvement of legislation which requires the state to adopt a policy of deliberate restraint on its mandated programs. This includes providing a mandatory fiscal note identifying local government costs on any new mandated programs when they are introduced in the Legislature, and a statement of compelling statewide interest to accompany all state mandates. The League further supports the recently adopted Governor's Advisory Council on State and Local Relations recommended guidelines for mandating for the legislative and executive branches. New mandates should include revenues or alternative revenue producing mechanisms, other than the general property tax subject to levy limits. Also, the Legislature should repeal obsolete, unnecessary, and unduly restrictive mandatory laws and rules. GLP -7. Public Contracting (B) The League supports legislative action to clarify and modernize state laws regulating city contracting for improvements, services 'and materials. Any change should maintain cities' flexibility in contracting. — As governmental bodies, cities and other local governments have an obligation to engage in fair and public contracting practices. State laws have attempted to provide guidance to local governments in their contracting practices. The League supports legislation updating these statutes to reflect inflation and to modify provisions to meet current needs or unique situations. 1. The League supports referencing the contract amounts over which sealed bids must taken in the amounts specified in M.S. 412.311. - 30 - GLP -7. Public Contracting (B) (cont'd) These statutes govern purchasing practices of statutory cities. However, in a 1978 opinion the attorney general stated that the _ bidding requirements for statutory cities are governed by the dollar limits of the uniform contracting law rather than M.S. 412.311. This opinion has been followed by most cities although recently there has been evidence of some continuing confusion. In order to clarify the matter the Legislature should adopt language making the two statutes consistent. 2. The Legislature should increase the purchasing authority of city managers in Plan B cities from $1,000 to conform to the amounts in the uniform municipal contracting law for contracts which do not have to be let after taking sealed bids. M.S. 412.691, first enacted. in 1949, provides that Plan B managers are the chief purchasing agent of their city. Currently, all purchases for the city and all contracts are made by the manager when the amount of the purchase or contract does not exceed $1,000; but all claims resulting therefrom must be audited and approved by the council similar to other claims. All other contracts and purchases are made by the council after obtaining the recommendation of the manager. The Legislature in 1959 increased the statutory amounts from $500 to $1,000. It seems reasonable to 'increase the amount to the level specified in the uniform contracting law for purchases that do not need competitive bidding, which is currently $15,000. 3. The League supports clarifying uncertainties that have arisen regarding when cities must obtain contractor's performance bonds. M.S. 574.26 provides that contractor's performance bonds must be obtained in order to validate any city contract for the doing of any public work, unless the contract is for less than $10,000. Letters of credit may be used as an alternative for projects up to $50,000. M.S. 469.155 provides that for industrial development projects a city may choose either to require a bond or may rely on the mechanics lien statutes to protect subcontractors, but in a pending court action at least one district court judge has ruled that a city may be deemed negligent if it does not require a bond. The League supports a continuing review of these statutes and supports clarifying legislation that allows cities to determine without fear of liability whether bonds or other security should be provided by a particular developer or contractor on public projects or development projects. Additionally, the Legislature should remove the dollar restriction that allows letters of credit only on public projects which are less than $50,000 and allow cities to determine which form of security best protects the citizen of the city regardless of the project cost. 4. The League supports legislation authorizing city councils to delegate authority to other city officers, employees, or consultants to - 31 - GLP -7. Public Contracting (B) (cont'd) approve up to a specified amount or percentage in change orders to pay for unforeseen circumstances both in public improvements under Chapter 429 and in other contract situations under the uniform municipal contracting law (M.S. 471.345). GLP -8. Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) Benefits; Financing, and Administration (B) The following principles should govern any changes the Legislature makes in Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) and the other statewide pension plans. 1. The League opposes any change in the PERA rule of 90 or the current early - retirement reduction factor for current employees, especially vested employees. Members have provided substantial service in reliance on these beneficial and sunposed permanent fund 2. The League of Minnesota Cities opposes modification of the "hi h five" formula. The adoption in 1973 of the "high five year" benefit formula for PERA has provided very adequate pension benefits for career municipal employees. Further shortening of the averaging period would create windfalls for some PERA members and multiply opportunities for manipulation of service and salaries to maximize pension benefits without proportional contributions to the fund. 3. The 1989 legislature made major benefit improvements, changed statutory assumptions and the time table for full funding Substantial experience with the new law should be gained before any significant changes are authorized by the Legislature Any contribution reductions permitted by excess reserves or excessive current contributions or combinations of the two should be of such amounts as to benefit the employer and employee equally as a percentage of overall employee salary or in the case of Police and fire, in the same percentages as contributions are made 4. PERA should not be authorized to create any additional health care plans for retired employees. State agencies have not demonstrated any ability to start and operate such plans effectively. 5. Legislation creating new, specially benefitted classes of employees as in the case of the newly created correctional employees plan, shoul not be implemented because other qroups of employees can make equally compelling arguments for inclusion 6. The League supports the continuation of the Minnesota post - retirement investment fund as a means of pr oviding post - retirement increases in the pension benefits of retirees under the statewide pension plans. - 32 - GLP -8 Public Financina. a 1 ees Retirement Association nistration (B) (cont'd) PERA) Benefits 7. No money or funding should be transferred directly or indirectly - from PERA to less well- funded plans. Since integration of pension fund administration mechanisms, or subjection of all funds to the authority of a.commissioner within the state executive branch may lead to combining the funds, the LMC opposes any move toward the combination - - -.. of administration of the three statewide pension programs. PERA e funding should not be put in jeopardy by refund of employer contributions upon privatization or dissolution of an employing unit. 8. The Legislature should amend the of the two percent tax provision on allow expenditures by the recipient over the employer's share of police or retired employee health insuranc payment.to PERA for transfer to the holding account. present provision on disbursement automobile casualty insurance to political subdivision of any excess retirement costs for any employee a costs, instead of requiring public employees insurance reserve The Department Of Employee Relations has not demonstrated any ability to start and successfully operate a health insurance program for active or retired public employees. GLP -9. Time and Distance Residency Requirements (B The League supports legislation allowing cities in the metropolitan area to enact reasonable area and response time restrictions if there Is a demonstrated.j:ob necessity for certain employees to reside close to the city. In recent years the Legislature has limited the authority of cities and other local units of government to impose.residency requirements for their employees. The Legislature has recognized, however, the need for insuring the ability of certain employees .to be available to respond to emergency situations. In 1984, in the same bill which prohibited non- metropolitan cities from enacting blanket residency requirements, the Legislature specifically allowed non - metropolitan cities to enact reasonable area and response time restrictions if there were demonstrated job necessities for employees to reside close to the city. Unfortunately, a drafting error prohibited metropolitan cities from enacting these restrictions. In 1985, the Legislature acted to allow metropolitan communities to impose reasonable time and distance requirements for volunteer firefighters. The result of the 1984 and 1985 legislative actions is a situation where metropolitan communities still cannot impose reasonable time and distance requirements for their police officers, paid firefighters, or any employee, with the exception of volunteer firefighters. - 33 - GLP -9. Time and Distance Residency Requirements (B) (cont'd The League recommends that.the Legislature grant metropolitan cities the same authority granted non - metropolitan cities to impose reasonable time and distance requirements where the city can show a demonstrated job - related necessity. Because these requirements must pass this difficult test and directly affect the public safety of the community, these requirements should, under no circumstances, be considered as mandatory subjects of collective bargaining. GLP -10. Presumptions For Workers' Compensation Benefits (B) The League supports modifications to the workers' compensation statutes (M.S. 176.011, subd 15) which would restrict Presumlotions of occupational diseases to apply only after an emiolo7ee can illness establish an absence of personal risk factors that could have caused the disease or . , The law allows for the legal presumption that police, fire, paramedics, emergency medical technicians, and nurses contract certain diseases or illnesses due to their employment. Employers must then rebut the presumption by introduction of evidence. This burden is difficult and increases the chance that employees receive compensation for nonworked caused illnesses and diseases. Currently, the law provides the following presumptions for the following personnel: Police and fire -- Myocarditis, coronary sclerosis, pneumonia or its sequel Police, fire, para- medic, emergency medical .technician, nurse -- Infectious or communicable disease (exposures outside of a hospital). Fire -- Cancer All of the listed disease or illnesses are common to the entire population and an equal or greater correlation may exist between the specific illness and the individual's personal risk factors such as smoking, diet, exercise, heredity, and lifestyle than the correlation between the job and the illness. For this reason, the League supports legislation limiting the presumption to cases where the employee can demonstrate limited personal risk factors, or alternately the Legislature should clarify the right of a local government employer to prohibit smoking on or off -duty and to require other measures to limit nonwork causes of these illnesses and diseases. - 34 - M a GLP -11. Gopher State One -Call (B) The League supports exempting cities and other local units of government from the Gopher State One -Call excavation system. The 1987 Legislature enacted a one -call excavation notice system. Among other requirements, the law requires local governments that issue permits for an activity involving excavation to continuously display a state prescribed excavator's and operator's notice, and to provide all permit applicants a copy of the state law (M.S. 216D.02). All excavators are then required to contact.the state notification center at least 48 hours prior to excavation (except in emergencies). The center is then to contact all operators of underground facilities (cable television, phone, electrical, heat, gas, oil, petroleum products, water including storm water, steam, sewage, and other similar substances) in the area which in turn are required to mark their facilities within 48 hours. Although labeled as a one -call notification center, the system will result in multiple contacts. For instance, an excavator will apply tc a city with an excavation permit system. The city will notify the excavator of the state law requirements. The excavator then contacts the state notification center which in turn will contact the city, among the operators, of an excavation the city already knows about and will charge them for the notification. This aspect of the system is absurd and should be modified to exclude notice-to cities when they have an excavation permit system which triggers the system. The Legislature should conduct a review of the one -call system to determine if it is being operated efficiently and to determine if its billing practices should be changed. GLP -12. Employee Benefits Health Care (B) The League supports legislation promoting the efficient and economical provision of life, health, and dental care benefits for city officers and employees and specifically opposes legislation which authorizes employees or groups of. employees to unilaterally select articular care providers. Cities, like all employers, are alarmed at the rapidly rising cost of health care in Minnesota. Further, health care availability is a critical issue in many parts of the state. The League supports efforts to ensure the availability of quality health care at affordable costs. However, some past legislative actions have limited cities flexibility in selecting health care providers. Specifically, as an element of the creation of a statewide health plan for public employees the Legislature provided that exclusive representatives may unilaterally determine whether their employees will participate in the state plan, leaving only the proportion of premium paid by the public employer - 35 - GLP -12. Em loyee Benefits Health Care (B) (cont'd subject to bargaining. The result may be additional administrative or personnel costs to the public employer. The Legislature should eliminate the unilateral selection authority it has granted exclusive representatives. GLP -13. One Class of Beer /Wine in Grocery Stores (B) The League opposes the establishment of one class of beer and the off sale of wine in other than liquor stores. The establishment of one class of beer in Minnesota would cause substantial problems in controlling the sale of beer in filling stations, grocery stores, drug stores, and elsewhere where 3.2 beer is sold. Also, 3.2 on -sale establishments would be selling strong beer without the supervision and controls imposed upon on -sale liquor establishments and municipal liquor stores. GLP -14. Towinq of Abandoned Vehicles (B) The League su ports legislation clarifyi impound abandoned motor vehicles. the authority of cities to State law prohibits a private vehicle tower from removing a motor vehicle from private property unless he has the permission of the owner of the vehicle or of the owner of the property (M.S. 465.75). While this statute intended to prohibit hawkish towing companies from improper towing practices is laudable, the ramifications of the law go too far. Cities are authorized to impound abandoned motor vehicles and state law provides a detailed process to accomplish the removal of health hazards and eyesores (M.S. 168B.04). Unfortunately, the recent legislative act could be construed to prohibit cities from utilizing private towers to remove and impound abandoned or junked automobiles. Cities could be forced to use its own employees and equipment because it is not "in the business of towing." The law should be amended by adding an exclusion for private towers who act at the direction.of a city following the procedures prescribed in Minnesota law. Additionally, 1989 legislation generally prohibited towing prior to the lapse of a four -hour period. The law, which was modeled after the City Of Minneapolis' towing ordinance, does not allow enough flexibility for unique circumstances in various cities. For instance, cities with lakes and public accesses have a serious problem with vehicles and boat trailers being parked near the access in a manner Which inhibits or prevents others from using the access. The Legislature should loosen the law to allow cities to address these unique circumstances. - 36 - GLP -15. Volunteer Fire Fighters (B) In the absence of an overriding and well- demonstrated need to provide full vesting for short service, the League opposes further reductions - in current statutory standards for vesting volunteer firefighter pensions. .Statutory changes to allow local volunteer fire fighter relief associations to pay full yearly pension benefit portions to retirees with less than 20 years-of service will increase actuarial costs to cities and reduce incentives.for, long service. GLP -16. Utility Service Territories (B The League supports legislation confirming the power of Minnesota cities: 1) to require franchises of all non-municipal electric, gas, telecommunication, steam, and hot water utilities as a p recondition to service within municipal boundaries and 2) if a city has or starts a municipal utility, to serve all territory within city boundaries without paying prohibitive, speculative, or unjustified buyout charges. In order to plan in the most effective and economical way for city .economic development and infrastructure needs including those not directly related to gas and electric or other services, cities need substantial controls over the type, location, cost, and layout of electric, gas, and other utilities. They must also be able to cause relocation of the same without great public expense. Recent decisions of the Public Service Commission have called into question.city powers to franchise in or serve new areas of the city. Rigid service territory boundaries established by the commission must be subject to practical modification to best serve the needs of city residents and the state as a whole. GLP -17. Government Training Service Funding (C) The League supports continued state financial funding for the Government Training Service. The Government Training Service (GTS) has been invaluable in maximizing training opportunities while minimizing training costs for local government officials and staff over the past 10 years. Both the need and the demand for services are greater than ever during these times of tight budgets. GTS continues to respond on behalf of all local jurisdictions in Minnesota by developing innovative, low -cost alternatives and exploring cost- effective delivery systems. The Legislature should continue state financial support for GTS. - 37 - GLP -18. Firefighter Certification (C) The League opposes any state - imposed voluntary or mandatory firefi htei certification programs, but supports the availability of technical and financial assistance from the state for local or regional trainingb programs. Recent proposals to establish a state professional qualifications board charged with certifying both voluntary and full -time firefighters, are unnecessary to assure proper training of local firefighters and could too easily be changed into mandatory certifications programs. The League supports efforts by the state to make training programs more readily available for local firefighters as well as financial assistance by the state to encourage local governments to provide additional training for firefighters. GLP -19. Military Leaves (C) The League recommends that the statutes be amended to provide that when an employee is temporarily absent because of short -term military service, the employer pay only the difference between military pay and the public pay, rather than the full public salary. Under current law, a city employee, as well as any other public employee, is entitled to leave with full pay and accrual of seniority status and other benefits for all the time the employee is engaged in short -term (15 days or less) military service while receiving full military pay. Cities, particularly those which must hire part -time replacement employees when others take military leave, suffer a significant financial hardship not shared by private sector employers who are not required to provide short -term paid military leaves. Public employees should only have to pay the difference between the employee's military pay and their regular wage for this 15 -day period. Any longer leave period should be without pay and the accrual of seniority and other benefits should be suspended for military leaves beyond 30 days. Current law which provides for mandatory leaves and reinstatement after wars, declared emergencies, active duty training, and duty training should be changed to provide for mandatory leaves and reinstatement only after wars and declared emergencies. Employees should not be entitled to leave and be reinstated for'active or inactive training duty. GLP -20. Joint Powers Act (C) The League supports efforts to study the current Minnesota joint owers act and recommends that the Legislature refrain from enacting any major changes to the act, prior to completion of such a study and consultation with local joint powers agencies. GLP -20. Joint Powers Act (C) (cont'd) In conducting a review of the current act, Governor's Advisory Council on State -Local ` to consider the policy behind establishing encourage cooperation between governmental study should be to encourage the use and e boards. GLP -21. Cable Communications (C the League urges the Relations or the Legislature such boards and the need to units. The main goal of the stablishment of joint power The League supports strengthening the existing Minnesota cable act. Cities in Minnesota enjoy among the most modern and technically sound cable communications systems in the world, due to strong partnerships and commitments among cable operators and federal, state, and local governments. These relationships are defined at the federal level by the cable communications policy act of 1984, at the state level by Minnesota Statutes Chapter 238, and at the local level by local cable franchise ordinances. In 1985, the Legislature abolished the Minnesota Cable Communications Board, an appointed body of the Department of Administration which promulgated and enforced provision of the cable legislation and accompanying rules. This legislation codified some previously existing board rules into statutory form and reassigned responsibility for telecommunications from the board to the commissioner of commerce. However, in 1987 the Legislature discontinued any state enforcement of cable. M.S. Chapter 238, in its present form, is very important to local governments because it protects cities rights to enforce local standards and cable operator commitments for technical, construction, and programming performance. Any changes should strengthen the authority of local governments to franchise and regulate cable communication systems in their communities. Additionally, the state should reinstitute active monitoring administration, and enforcement of cable with specific reference to the proper filing of initial and modified franchise ordinances. GLP -22. State Licensing of Contractors (C) The League opposes the state's takeover of trade contractor licensing Licensing of general trade contractors and various other activities has long been a local prerogative, and the mechanism for license review, issuance, and enforcement is already in place. The primary reason that - 39 - GLP -22. State Licensing of Contractors (C) (cont'd) local licensing has been successful and therefore maintained at the local level is that inspection and enforcement personnel reside at the local level, know the area and activities, and are familiar with local - ordinance and restrictions, thus providing better and faster enforcement. Suggestions have been made to form a statewide licensing authority and split the revenue among the licensing agency and various municipalities with the cities maintaining enforcement tasks. It is questionable under this arrangement if either the agency or municipalities would have enough funds to accomplish the respective tasks. The current proposals seem to complicate the existing system which is effectively regulating the contractors and may result in a reduction of small contractors who operate in only a limited number of communities. GLP -23. Local Police and Paid Fire Relief Associations (C 1. Individual local police and fire relief associations, with city consent, should be encouraged to merge into the PERA police and fire funds under the uniform policy enacted during the 1987 legislative session. Any amendments to the p olicy should lower city consolidation costs while fully protecting the solvency of the PERA police and fire fund. 2. If the Legislature determines that "escalation" (pensions adjusted ny the percentage increase of wages of active members) presently in effect does not offer adequate inflation protection, that mechanism should be adjusted or abolished However, no new mechanism such as that authorized for Minneapolis police or firefighters in Laws 1988, CHAPTER 319, should be authorized while "escalation" remains in effect. If despite city objections, the Legislature authorizes another benefit increase for local police and paid fire members, all costs of the benefit increase should be borne by the state. The establishment of multiple mechanisms to make post retirement adjustments to protect retirees in local police and paid firefighter pension plans is illogical, confusing, unnecessary, disruptive, and expensive. GLP -24. State Financing of the District Court System (C) The Leag financin defender reduce c system. e supports the transfer to the state the state district court system, in system provided that the transfer or ty revenue sources or 1: of the luding relate obligation for the p ublic actions not mit city access to the judicial - 40 - .4 _ GLP -24. State Financing of the District Court System (C) (cont'd) The League generally supports the transfer of court system financing obligations to the state as necessary and proper following the recent transfer of the administration and oversight responsibilities to the state. However, similar to the position of the Legislature, administration, courts and public defender system, cities do not want to be negatively impacted by the transfer either financially or administratively. The League specifically opposes any effort to divert to the state fines, fees, or other revenues meant to partially compensate cities for their law enforcement and prosecution costs. GLP -25. Social Investing (C) Public employee pension funds should be invested solely for the purpose of maximizing investment return while maintaining the security of the principle. Investment management responsibility for public employee pension reserves should be removed from the,state Board of Investment and lodged in a politically independent board the membership of which is limited to people qualified to manage investment portfolios for large pension programs. - 41 - League of Minnesota Cities Policy LUEET -1. LUEET -2. LUEET -3. LUEET -4. LUEET -5. LUEET -6. LUEET -7. LUEET -8. LUEET -9. 183 University Ave. East St. Paul, MN 55101 -2526 (612) 227.5600 (FAX: 221 -0986) LAND USE, ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND TRANSPORTATION Wastewater Treatment Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Transportation Land Use, Zoning, Subdivision, Planning, and Annexation Ground and Surface Water Management Environmental Trust Fund Pesticides and Other Hazardous Materials Eminent Domain Law Energy Conservation - 43 - s Priority A A A A B B C C C -:r i 183 University Ave. East St. Paul, MN 55101-2526. League Of Minnesota Cities (612) 227 -5600 (FAX: 221 -0986) LAND USE, ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT, AND TRANSPORTATION LUEET -1. Wastewater Treatment (A) The League supports continued state and federal assistance, and alternative programs, which provide financing for wastewater treatment construction projects Clean water is vitally important to the citizens of this country and particularly to residents and visitors of Minnesota. Minnesota's cities remain committed to improving water quality. Unfortunately, the costs involved in providing cleaner water are staggering. Because of the incredible cost, it is economically impractical to immediately .eliminate wastewater pollution. Therefore, all levels of government must take a reasonably balanced approach to solving the wastewater pollution problem.. The ability of cities to comply with any clean water program is contingent upon the availability of adequate.funds for treatment facilities. Since 1978, federal grant funding for the wastewater treatment construction grant program has been rapidly phased out. The same budget constraints facing the federal government exist at the state and local level but to'a greater degree due to limited revenue sources..: 1. The League supports federal and state efforts to establish a stable funding program-with 80 percent state /federal funding and -20 percent local funding. General funding to support this program is essential, either from state bonds or general revenues. 2. The League supports equalization efforts.. Cities which received -financial assistance between 1985 and 1987 were required to locally finance between 30 and 50 percent of construction costs. Cities receiving grants both before and after this period, received grants that allowed local financing to be no more than 20 percent of the project costs. The grant recipients that paid 30 to 50 percent should receive a small supplemental grant from the state to reduce the local share to 20 percent, thus equalizing benefits among communities. Revenues to finance this equalization effort should not diminish other wastewater treatment financing programs. 3. The League also supports alternatives to grant programs. Revolving loan funds are acceptable financing alternatives to the extent that grant programs are not sufficiently funded and the loan program is supplementary to, and not a replacement for, grant programs. Any loan program should take into consideration varying local financial capabilities. - 45 - LUEET -1. Wastewater Treatment (A) (cont'd) 4. The League supports efforts to eliminate or minimize preliminary grant review processes. The construction grants should seek to encourage immediate construction with minimal prior review by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and provide reimbursement to communities on the basis of proven performance in reducing pollutants in wastewater effluent. The program should avoid discouraging privatization and innovative treatment methods. The reimbursement program should ensure state financing within a reasonable period of time, not to exceed five years. Entry into the reimbursement program should be predicated on financing being available within the five -year period. 5. The League supports a full legislative review of water quality permit fees and opposes the imposition of these fees on local units of government to the extent that the actual state's costs cannot be specifically justified and only serve as an alternative means for the state to raise revenue. If fees are determined to be properly imposed on governmental units, the fees should be based solely on the cost of actually providing governmental services to the political subdivision, and private sector alternatives should be made available to ensure minimal costs to local taxpayers. 6. The League opposes efforts by either the state or federal governments to institute enforcement actions or impose increased fees or charges against communities for failure to meet effluent standards while at the same time assigning these communities a low priority on the needs list for state and federal funding. 7. The League supports recent Pollution Control Agency efforts to have agency staff available to communities as resources for operator assistance, evaluation of treatment needs, educational or liaison efforts, and rate - setting assistance. The League particularly supports the use of neighboring city staff as additional advisors for communities. The League requests that the Legislature provide additional staff and resources to the agency to continue and expand the community assistance program. 8. The League also supports the continuation of efforts on individual wastewater treatment systems to reduce pollution problems which may be caused by these systems. LUEET -2. Solid and Hazardous Waste Manaqement (A The League supports state programs designed to minimize or eliminate the need to landfill solid and hazardous waste. The problem of regulating, controlling, and disposing of solid and hazardous waste will continue to be a major environmental issue both nationally and in Minnesota. Major state legislation addressing this issue has been enacted annually since 1980. These acts - 46 - LUEET -2. Solid and Hazardous Waste Management (A) (cont'd) responded to the concerns and issues raised by the League and local governments, and we commend the Legislature for its actions. The existing waste management and control system for the handling and disposal of hazardous materials centralizes responsibility at the state level, but requires the cooperation and support of all levels of government. The system established for solid waste is more diffuse, relying on cities to control and regulate collection, counties to regulate or operate existing resource recovery or disposal facilities, and the state to coordinate responsibilities and plan for future disposal needs. Both systems foster and encourage abatement, recycling, and resource recovery for as much of the waste stream as possible and then to assure environmentally sound disposal for the remaining waste. The system appears to be working, and therefore the League does not perceive a need for major changes to existing legislation at the present time. But any future legislation that may be considered should enhance and not diminish the emphasis on these concerns. 1. Effective Planning. To the greatest extent possible, all levels and units of government and the private sector should be involved in all phases of planning and managing the solid and hazardous waste streams to assure a cost - efficient and environmentally sound solid waste and hazardous waste disposal system. 2. Alternatives to Landfills. The League strongly endorses abatement, recycling, and resource recovery activities and programs to reduce the need for the land disposal of waste. The goal should be to reduce, to the maximum extent practical, the need for land disposal of unprocessed solid waste, and to totally eliminate the land disposal of hazardous waste. The League supports annual statewide recycling goals for local governments based on a percent of total tons of mixed municipal solid waste generated. The League would support the eventual prohibition of disposal of unprocessed.solid waste in landfills, as cost - efficient and environmentally safe alternatives are developed and funding is provided to cities to implement their responsibilities. The League supports mandatory funds financed by tipping fees if the funds derived from the fees are used to pay for closure and post- closure costs of landfills in the political jurisdiction where the fee is derived. Local control and management of these funds is essential. Additionally, the amount required to be raised locally should be set at a level that recognizes the financial stability of cities and the financing resources available to cities. 3. Funding for Recycling,,Reduction, and Abatement Efforts. The League supports alternatives to general taxes as sources of financing conservation efforts. These alternatives can include specific taxes, additional fees on landfill or disposal facility users, and state - 47 - LUEET -2. Solid and Hazardous Waste Management (A) (cont'd) grants and loans. The Legislature should continue to fund educational efforts on the subject of solid and hazardous waste disposal, including_ alternatives for the disposal of household hazardous waste, such as 02 those promoted by.the household hazardous waste reduction project. 4: Financial Incentives for Recycling. The League supports container deposit legislation and other efforts to provide a financial incentive for individuals to recycle. 5. Financial Incentives for Degradable Packaging. The League supports efforts at the state and federal level to institute financial incentives to use degradable packaging materials as well as recyclables. The state should not pre -empt local regulatory authority in the absence of an effective, state -wide regulatory framework or program. 6. Clean -up of Hazardous Substance Locations. The clean -up and decontamination of existing hazardous waste sites should continue before there is further damage to public health and environment. If a responsible party can be identified, that party should be liable for clean -up costs and personal injury damages as defined in law. If a responsible party cannot be identified, then the clean -up should be financed by the state superfund. Cities which acquire land should not, because of their acquisition, become the responsible parties for cleanup. 7. Condemnation Awards. The League supports legislation ensuring that condemnation awards to compensate for a taking of polluted land are adjusted to accurately reflect the fair market value of the land in its polluted condition, rather than its fair market value after pollutants are removed by the acquiring authority. 8. Implementation of Federal Superfund Community Right -to -Know and Emergency Response Provisions. Amendments to the federal superfund law require individuals and businesses possessing hazardous materials to report the size and nature of their inventories to state and local agencies and require the creation of hazardous materials response teams. The League supports the adoption of state programs which minimize the cost of these programs to our citizens while fully meeting federal requirements. The new law and subsequent regulations have the potential for imposing significant costs on local governments. These additional costs and administrative burdens should be carefully monitored and efforts made to reduce the impact on cities, such as seeking to consolidate the reporting, recordkeeping, and inspection requirements. Additionally, cities, as the likely first respondees to any incident, should be given "priority in establishing emergency response plans. 9. Solid Waste Collection. To the extent that cities' abilities to organize solid waste collection is impaired by judicial intent of federal or state antitrust laws, the Legislature should amend either =: LUEET -2. Solid and Hazardous Waste Management (A) (cont'd) the organized collection or antitrust laws to enable cities to effectively organize solid waste collection. 10. Collector Compensation. Refuse haulers have asked the Legislature to study whether and under what circumstances state statutes should require local governments to compensate refuse haulers for "business losses" incurred as the result of governmental regulation or organization. The League opposes any legislation which would depart from the current practice of relying on judicial interpretations of the federal and state constitutions' taking clauses. These constitutional provisions specify that no person may be deprived of their property without just compensation being paid by the government. Providing for compensation to haulers could be precedent for paying landfill or other disposal facility operators as well as any person who is licensed or regulated by the state or local government for any change in state or local standards. Any legislation in this area could result also in governments "freezing" current markets to avoid paying compensation, avoiding regulatory action to avoid payments which consequently will make state goals more difficult to attain, and possibly result in unjustly enriching an inefficient or undeserving business. 11. The League strongly supports legislation that requires responsible disposal of CFCs (Freon) and Halons. The air conditioning and refrigeration service operators and the waste management /disposal industry must recapture and recycle waste products. Eliminating CFCs (Freon) and Halon from the waste stream should be the goal. LUEET -3. Transportation (A) The League supports legislative action providing an adequate and stable source of highway and transit funding, and specifically supports retaining a local share of any additional motor vehicle excise tax transferred from the general fund. An efficient transportation system is a vital element in planning for fiscal, economic, and social development at state, regional, and local levels.. Since the agricultural and recreational economy of the state and its cities are dependent upon .highway transportation, it is necessary to determine long -range highway needs to assure the vitality of the state's economy. Furthermore, environmental concerns and the need to conserve energy require the use of alternate modes of transportation in meeting the diverse needs which exist in various communities and regions of the state. Additional road funding is necessary. Tied in with the funding issue are the issues of jurisdiction studies and turnbacke, and potential constitutional amendments regarding dedication of the motor vehicle excise tax to the highway fund and the current allocation formula (62 percent to the state, 29 percent to the counties, and nine percent to cities over 5.,000 population) for road funds. Jurisdictional studies that attempt to establish the level of use for - 49 - LUEET -3. Transportation (A) (cont'd) particular roads (i.e. classifying roads as collectors, arterials, etc.) have for the most part been completed. Some groups advocate the_ assignment of road maintenance responsibilities to other levels of government. The League recommends the following. 1. The League supports the continued dedication of the sales tax on motor vehicle sales for transportation purposes, and advocates the prompt transfer of 100 percent of the motor vehicle excise tax into the highway user and transit assistance fund. Transfer only to the state trunk highway fund is shortsighted and ignores pressing needs on the local road systems. The Legislature has made some effort to provide transportation funding recently by increasing license fees and the gasoline tax. The League opposes further increases in the gas tax at this time, particularly in light of the repeal of a local share in the MVET. 2. The League supports legislative efforts to establish a system of direct appropriations to cities under 5,000 population, either through a constitutional amendment modifying the 62 -29 -9 formula, or out of the current 29 percent county share of the highway user funds, or at least to the extent that townships receive direct appropriations. Mandatory state guidelines concerning county use of road funds should be required to insure that all communities within a county receive an equitable share of these funds at the very least. Further, the state should establish minimum county funding participation requirements for state and federal highway projects. 3. As an alternative to increased state funding, the possibility of reclassifying many roadways in the state as to appropriate use classifications and jurisdiction has been studied and proposed. The increased cost for cities to assume responsibility for general maintenance and life -cycle treatment far exceeds the current financial capacities of cities. Rather than 'saving money, turnbacks merely make the property tax payer -- rather than the users -- responsible for financing highways. For these reasons, no wholesale program of highway turnbacks should be instituted at this time. Instead, existing mechanisms for'the orderly turnback of roads should be fine tuned, including increasing the level of funding in the municipal turnback account, and prohibiting unilateral revocations or turnbacks by road authorities unless a hearing is held and the road is brought up to its normal maintenance standards before the revocation is effective. Other changes needed to facilitate turnbacks include: a) State aid rules should be changed to allow counties to upgrade county state aid highways using c.s.a.h. funds prior to turnback with city concurrence and without penalty as currently imposed by the rules; b) The League supports use of a portion of the highway motor vehicle excise tax to provide an adequate source for turnback funds, and; mlem LUEET -3. Transportation (A) (cont'd) c) The League supports allowing cities to determine if a turnback road will be designated as a state -aid road or local street, and if the city chooses to designate the road as a state -aid road, this designation should not affect the standard designation process, so that developing cities will be able to continue to designate a percentage of new road growth as part of the state -aid system. 4. The special state bonding program should be continued to provide funds for counties, towns, and cities for the replacement or repair of bridges. 5. Mass transit funding should remain a priority for the state. Funding for the existing level of operation for mass transit should be maintained at a fixed share formula for local governments. 6. The Legislature should continue the Minnesota Department of Transportation as the ride -share program coordinating agency, and to provide adequate funding for its continuation. 7. The possibility and feasibility of utilizing existing railroad trackage as part of a fixed guideway and /or light rail mass transit system should be addressed. If existing railroad trackage /rights -of -way are petitioned for abandonment, these or portions thereof, should be preserved by appropriate government agencies through alternate public use, until rail systems once again become economically feasible or needed because of energy considerations. Non - property tax sources of funding light rail transit should be encouraged. 8. The Legislature should restore the bikeway grants program in order -to promote safety in a growing recreational activity. 9. The League opposes legislation allowing longer truck tractor and trailer combinations on Minnesota highways due to the various public safety and infrastructure cost problems caused by these trucks, such as off - tracking of,rear wheels, acceleration distance needs, and time and distance required for passing. 10. The Legislature should authorize cities to establish, at their option, a road access charge to be levied on an area or per lot basis at the time subdivisions are approved, similar to park dedication fees, or on existing open lots when a building permit is issued. Growing communities are finding it increasingly difficult to finance construction of facilities needed for new residential, commercial, and industrial development. Assessment to developing property for sewers and streets directly benefitting that property is a long- standing legal option, and is the most prevalent method used. However, there are often major streets that need to be constructed leading to new developments. Under current law, only the abutting benefitted property can-be assessed, and then only to the degree of benefit, which in most cases is not nearly enough to pay for an - 51 - LUEET -3. Transportation (A) (cont'd) upgraded roadway that services a larger population. The Legislature has recognized similar situations and authorized charges to provide facilities not directly abutting the affected property. The most ' common is park dedication fees on a per unit or area basis and sewer availability charges. LUEET -4. Land Use, Zoning, Subdivision, Planning, and Annexation (B The League opposes amendments to the existing planning enabling statutes that would restrict cities' current substantive and procedural flexibility to address unique circumstances Minnesota's land use, planning, and annexation statutes and regulations are essential to promoting economic development, preserving environmental resources, and ensuring the efficient delivery of public services. Public policies which encourage substantial development in non -urban areas and which extend public services beyond existing jurisdictions and service areas are wasteful and counter - productive. Additionally, shoreland and prime agricultural land are major natural and economic resources and the state should include as a major objective, their preservation and wise use. Particular attention should be given to the problem of development and the delivery of governmental services to urbanizing fringe areas. State law should continue to encourage the preservation of shoreland and prime agricultural land and discourage the development of such land outside designated growth areas to be served by a city. The League recommends: 1. That state statutes regulating annexation be changed to make it easier for cities to annex developed or developing land, within unincorporated areas-designated as a growth area by the annexing city. It is unfair to city residents to have individuals avoid paying their fair share for municipal services provided by the city government by living in the fringe area around a city; 2. That cities' retain current subdivision authority to regulate subdivisions over county regulations as provided in M.S. 462.358; and 3. That the statutes authorizing concurrent detachments and annexations be reviewed to determine whether it is appropriate for individuals to petition the municipal board to institute the statutory procedures. The League recommends providing for veto power over the landowner's petition by either of the affected cities. The Governor's Advisory Council on State -Local Relations has completed a thorough review of the state's planning and zoning laws. The League - 52 - LUEET -4. Land Use, Zoning, Subdivision, Planning. and Annexation (B) (cont'd) participated in this study. A subcommittee of local elected officials was formed to review the recommendations developed by a technical committee composed of planning officials from townships, cities, v _ counties, regional development commissions, and the state. Those recommendations have been collected in a report on land use legislation, and draft legislation has been prepared, with introduction in the 1990 session probable. In general, the League supports those sections of the proposed .legislation that preserve or provide flexibility for cities to plan and regulate land uses, and opposes those sections that limit a city's ability to tailor procedures and controls to meet local needs. Specifically, the League supports the following. 1. The Legislature should change the requirement of undue hardship to a more reasonable standard, which would loosen the current standard to reflect common practice in granting variances. 2. The League supports requiring the adoption of a comprehensive plan in order to have zoning or other land use controls as long as the comprehensive plan is merely a statement of goals, objectives, and policies, and present and proposed land use maps. Recent cases have called into question the common practice of passing ordinances without ­a supporting comprehensive plan. Metropolitan cities have had this - requirement for,several years; and should continue to be covered by the Metropolitan Land Planning Act. Cities should have a five -year grace period to adopt a comprehensive plan, and financial assistance should be made available. 3.. The Legislature should authorize cities to use impact fees and other development- related fees to partially offset the public costs that are associated with development. The League strongly opposes the following. 1. The state should not mandate administrative procedures and roles of elected and appointed officials which eliminate or diminish the decision - making authority and flexibility municipal officials need, and now have, under the current enabling law. 2. The League opposes requiring the creation of a separate planning commission or board of adjustment. These requirements would unnecessarily limit the authority of a city to establish a structure that meets its unique situation. In addition, smaller communities may find it difficult to recruit board members. At the very least, an intermediate appeal from the board of adjustment to the council should be allowed by ordinance. 3. The League is opposed to prohibiting the practice of conditional against changes in development proposals. Cities should be authorized to use conditional zoning at the discretion of the local government. - 53 - LUEET -4. Land Use, Zoning, Subdivision, Planning, and Annexation (B) (cont'd) 4. The League opposes requiring that zoning controls be rigidly _ consistent with the comprehensive plan. The courts have used inconsistencies between the plan and ordinances that almost inevitably result to compel rezonings. As a result, the Legislature clarified that zoning ordinances will control in situations where uses in the two documents are not consistent. This has greatly solved the problem and should not be unnecessarily modified. 5. The League disagrees with the fringe area growth proposal. This proposal would allow any single local government unit to force the creation of a joint advisory board to review existing controls that govern land within a quarter mile of the city's boundaries and existing controls that govern land within two miles outside the city limits. Any two of three local governments could force the creation of a joint planning board which would serve as a joint planning commission for the designated area. Board recommendations would have to be acted on within 45 days by the governing units represented on the board. . The joint board should not have any advisory or other authority within the city boundaries since the purpose of the board is to evaluate existing controls and make recommendations on controls necessary to properly manage fringe area growth. 6. The Department of Natural Resources has recently adopted amendments to the state's shoreland regulations. These rule amendments will necessitate-the modification of all local shoreland ordinances. While experience with the current state regulations has demonstrated the need for revisions in order to effectuate state policy regarding the use of, shoreland areas, the state must provide technical and funding assistance to cities and other local units of government in modifying local plans. Funding assistance should not be based solely on miles of shoreland within a jurisdiction but should also reflect the greater development pressures in cities. LUEET -5. Ground and Surface Water Management (B) The League supports legislation establishing a framework and 2rovidi incentives for local governments to adopt programs or Plans aimed at conserving Minnesota's ground and surface waters. In order to safeguard the public health and the environment it is necessary to plan and manage our water resources as a valuable state resource. Many watershed districts, counties, cities, and towns have done a good job of dealing with surface and groundwater management issues and have the authority and ability to continue to do so in a cost - effective manner. These existing mechanisms should continue to be used to the greatest extent possible to address surface and groundwater management problems, instead of establishing a new system or creating new organizations. - 54 - LUEET -5. Ground and Surface Water Management (B) (cont'd) The League supports as a basic principle that no one has the right to pollute either ground or surface water resources. A reasonable relationship -of economic and social costs and benefits should be a precondition toward achieving.a goal of.non- degradation or treatment resulting in clean-water. The ability of- cities to meet goals must be recognized as contingent upon the.availability of adequate funding, including state assistance. These principles should apply to both the protection of our drinking water supplies and the operation of municipal services. Because water issues affect many state agencies and come under the jurisdiction of numerous legislative committees, policy making in the area of water resources has been,somewhat fragmented and confused. The League, therefore, supported the creation of a Legislative Commission on Water by the 1989 Legislature. The commission should.be similarily structured and empowered as existing commissions on waste management and employee relations. The commission-should be charged with reviewing legislative and agency roles and relationships. The League proposes that the commission be sunsetted in five years to provide for a review of its effectiveness. Local units of government should retain the basic responsibility for surface water management, as they are the level of government closest to the problem. In 1982, legislation required local governments in the metropolitan area to adopt surface water run off controls and regulations. In 1985, legislation encouraged similar steps to be taken in the non-metropolitan-area of the state. Further,.state financial assistance will be necessary to translate these plans into effective management programs. Legislation passed in 1987 creating the clean water partnership will provide financial and technical assistance to local governments. These statutes should be given sufficient time to work, before additional programs or extensive changes to existing programs are enacted by the Legislature. The possibility.of intergovernmental conflict should be studied and dispute resolution.mechanisms should be re- evaluated. The Legislature should provide additional funds to further.encourage cities and other local governments to undertake water planning, clean up, prevention, and management activities. Specifically, additional state funds are necessary to finance mandated programs such as well sealing, removal of underground storage tanks, and clean up of contaminated water supplies. Special levies should also be made available to fund water management projects. LUEET -6. Environmental Trust Fund (B The voters have approved a constitutional amendment for the creation of an environmental trust fund and the Legislature should act promptly to include as eligible programs wastewater treatment facilities, su erfund cleanup actions, and solid waste disposal facilities. - 55 - LUEET -6. Environmental Trust Fund (B) (cont'd) The 1988 Legislature concluded that all Minnesotans share the responsibility to ensure wise stewardship of the state's environment and natural resources for the benefit of current citizens and future generations, and that the proper management of the state's environment and natural resources requires foresight, planning, and long -term activities that allow the state to preserve its high quality environment and provide for wise use of its natural resources. In order to provide a long -term, consistent, and stable source of funding, the Legislature asked Minnesota's citizens to approve the creation of a constitutionally dedicated environment and natural resources trust fund financed by one -half of the state lottery (with voter approval) and other state appropriations. The voters approved the measure overwhelmingly. Although the fund is constitutionally created, the eligibility of programs and projects for funding is set by statute. Current law provides that the following programs or projects are eligible for financing from the trust fund: * R.I.M. (Reinvest in Minnesota), a program encouraging the use of marginal agricultural land as wildlife habitat; * Research projects; * Data collection; * Public education programs; * Capital projects preserving or protecting unique resources; and * Activities that preserve or enhance wildlife, fish, and other natural resources that otherwise may be substantiallly impaired or destroyed in any area of the state. Projects or programs specifically excluded from eligibility include: * Superfund cleanup actions; * Wastewater treatment projects; and * Solid waste disposal facilities (incinerators, landfills, etc). The legislation does provide that if the principal of the trust fund reaches or exceeds $200 million, up to five percent of the fund ($10 million) may be used to provide cities with below market rate interest loans for water system improvements. Every one of the environmental protection programs identified as ineligible to receive trust funds have estimated needs of tens and hundreds of millions of dollars. The need to allocate governmental resources to ensure adequate and clean water for drinking, recreation, and commercial use should be one of Minnesota's highest priorities. The efficient management of solid waste is also an immediate and demonstrated need. Yet these programs are ineligible for trust fund financing. A trust fund may indeed be needed. But the Legislature should act to ensure that an environment and natural resources trust fund not ignore - 56 - LUEET -6. Environmental Trust Fund (B) (cont'd current serious and expensive environmental problems. A balance between short- and long -term environment and natural resource needs • should and can be established. The state should adequately finance current programs designed to provide this and future generations with a quality environment and abundant natural resources, and increasing the types of programs eligible for funding from the trust fund is one way for the state to meet its obligations. LUEET -7. Pesticides and Other Hazardous Materials (C The League supports legislation requiring local consent prior to state licensing of agricultural and.industrial chemical storage and distribution centers and enabling local units of government to regulate the antra -city transportation, storage, and application of pesticides and other hazardous materials. Individuals and governments at all levels are experiencing problems as a result of the use and transportation of pesticides, herbicides, and related chemicals by industry, farms, residences, and others. The public health and safety concerns raised by the use of pesticides and other chemicals must be addressed. In one recent Minnesota survey, almost 30 percent of public water supplies and over 50 percent of private wells were found to be contaminated. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture is required by:current law to regulate the use and storage of agricultural chemicals and any` -local regulation in this area, with the exception of local licensing, penalty, and enforcement. This pre-emption of-locally established standards could lead to.the granting of licenses by the state for operations which are a threat to the public health and safety of local communities. To protect against this eventuality, the Department of Agriculture should be required to.obtain local consent prior to the licensing of any agricultural chemical storage or distribution center. Also, if the local government unit decides to regulate agricultural chemicals, state regulation should supplement, not pre -empt such regulation. The League encourages tighter state regulation of agricultural chemical run -off from aerial spraying and ground application of pesticides that may affect water quality, as well as research into the long -term effects of the use of agricultural chemicals on the general population, and possible alternatives for the agricultural industry. To foster stricter regulation, the Legislature should transfer the regulatory autority of the Department of Agriculture to the Health Department or the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. - 57 - LUEET -8. Eminent Domain Law (C The League recommends that the Legislature undertake a comprehensive study of the eminent domain statutes The League believes the entire eminent domain process should be critically reviewed and streamlined. This examination should include a. re- evaluation of an alternative system of review of condemnation awards. For example, the examination should review using a professional referee, a hearing examiner, etc., rather than a court; using a professional referee in lieu of three commissioners to establish the value of the land; the public purposes for which the law may be used, including its use to encourage economic development; the difficulty posed by the existence of pollution on the condemned property; and the legality and feasibility of collecting past property taxes on,property in instances where the award is substantially in excess of the market value of the property for tax purposes. LUEET -9. Energy Conservation (C) The League supports legislation providing incentives for energy conservation in both the public and private sectors. Overall energy conservation strategies involving the public, private, commercial, and industrial sectors are being developed based on the rationale that conservation efforts achieve the greatest energy savingE at the lowest cost. Many of these efforts are receiving valuable assistance from the state. The League believes that a city's individual energy conservation strategy can be accomplished if the Legislature permits or establishes some of the following measures. 1. Conservation Efforts. The League recommends support of the use of bonding and special levies by local governments for implementation of energy conservation measures, including building energy audits. This authority would supplement the current municipal energy loan program. The Legislature should also continue to encourage private sector conservation through tax credits and other incentives and should explore the possibility of expanding incentives for earth - sheltered, super - insulated, and underground development. 2. District Heating. The League supports efforts to promote statewide applications of district heating technology including: providing additional funds or the ability to special levy for conducting district heating feasibility studies at the community level, ensuring consideration of district heating potential in the power plant siting process, and continuing use of the state district heating bond program for renovation of existing district heating systems. 3. Energy Assistance. Rising energy costs will continue to place a burden on the economic vitality of communities in Minnesota. The League recommends: LUEET -9. Energy Conservation (C) (cont'd) a) Continuation of the fuel assistance program for low- income households, with expanded services to train recipients in energy conservation practices and with a requirement of recipient participation in weatherization programs if the recipient is the owner; b) Support for weatherization programs operated through cities, counties, and Community Action Program agencies; c) Continued support for the Minnesota Housing and Finance Agency's loan and grant program for home weatherization. 4. Local Regulatory Authority. Local governments are in the best position to assess local needs and regulate energy consumption within their. communities. The League recommends giving any municipality the option to adopt and enforce an energy code that may more stringent than the state building code for purposes of energy conservation. - 59 - ` " League of Minnesota Cities W . .183 University Ave. East St. Paul, MN 55101 -2526 (612) 227 -5600 (FAX: 221 -0986) REVENUE SOURCES Policy RS -1. Property Tax Reform RS -2. Local Government Aid and State Funding to Cities RS -3. . Elimination of Levy Limits RS -4. Truth in Taxation RS -5. Sales and Motor Vehicle Excise Tax Extension RS -6. State Administrative Costs RS -7. Stability of State Revenues RS -8.- Sales. Ratio Issues RS -9. License Fees RS 710. Service Fees for Government -Owned Property RS -11. State Audits and City Financial Reporting Requirements RS -12. Encouraging Improvements on Older Homestead Properties - 61 - Priority A A A A B B B B C C N. A ` a League of Minnesota Cities it . 183 University Ave. East St. Paul, MN 55101 -2526 (612) 227 -5600 (FAX: 221 -0986) REVENUE SOURCES RS -1.. Property Tax Reform (A) In enacting changes in Minnesota's property tax system, the League recommends the following. 1. The impact of the proposal should be thoroughly analyzed, not only for its impact statewide, but also for its impact on individual communities, so that unfair and disparate effects are avoided. 2. Major shifts that increase disparities in tax burdens among taxing jurisdictions should not occur. Differences in property tax burdens between neighboring tax jurisdictions which provide similar services must also be kept within reasonable limits. Disparities interfere with cities' abilities to compete fairly for residents and economic development. 3. All sianificant chanaes should be phased in so that cities can adequately plan for needed adjustments. 4. Total state funding for property tax relief should increase at least the rate of inflation to prevent tax burdens from.increasing at a much more rapid rate. 5. The Leaaue opposes anv further transfer of city aid to schools or counties beyond what was transferred under the 1989 tax law. In any transfer of property tax relief funds from cities to schools or counties, the Legislature must insure that the transferred tax relief is preserved for the taxpayer and does not result in higher school or. county levies. The Legislature should examine closely the school aid formula and school referendum levies for operating costs to protect against increasing property taxes in the future. 6. Local government aid, or an equivalent program of sharing state revenue with cities, should remain an essential component of the property tax system. (See RS -2. Local Government Aid.) 7. The League recognizes the problems caused by low property tax capacity and agrees that a state aid formula must seek to address those problems. It is also imperative that the legislature recognize that many cities are confronted by problems which create higher revenue needs. Only by addressing both sides of the revenue equation -- capacity and need - -can a balanced state aid formula be designed 8. The number of property tax classes should be reduced to 10 or fewer. - 63 - RS -1. Property Tax Reform (A) (cont'd) 9. Providing property tax relief to commercial /industrial, rental, and high valued homestead property should remain a high priority. 10. An income - adjusted circuit breaker and renters' credit program should continue. 11. Property tax changes should not 'eopardize the financial stability of tax increment finance (TIF) districts. In particular homestead and agricultural credit aid should not be denied to TIF districts. Any tax reform should recognize the cash flow and obligations of.TIF districts. RS -2. Local Government Aid and State Funding to Cities (A The League supports continuation of the local government aid (LGA) program as an essential component of the state's property tax relief system., The recent decision to transfer state aid from cities to schools must not be the beginning of a diminished state commitment to cities. For the future the League recommends that at a minimum, the LGA appropriation be increased annually to Keep pace with the rising costs of providing local government services, as measured by the state and local implicit price deflator. Additionally, the increased costs to cities caused by state and federal mandates as well as the revenue shorts a caused by federal funding cuts should be taken into account in setting LGA appropriation levels. Local government aid should not be sacrificed in any attempted reform of the state's property.tax structure. It is a major source of revenue which complements cities' other significant revenue source, the property tax. As such, LGA must be distributed among cities in a way which alleviates the problems inherent with reliance on the property tax. Cities vary markedly in their ability to raise revenue from property taxes. There are also wide variations among cities in their citizens', needs for services and the costs of providing those services. A complementary revenue source for cities is necessary precisely because a city's ability to raise revenue from the property tax does not necessarily coincide with the cost of the services which that city must provide to its citizens. Therefore, the 'LGA formula should reflect both the individual city's need and its local revenue-raising capacity. Increased funding for categorical aid programs should not replace cities' LGA funding. For example, the Year of the City program should not be considered property tax relief, and state property tax relief funds should not be used to.finance this program. In addition, funding for the Year of the City program.should benefit all cities, not just first class cities. Furthermore, new categorical aid programs which address specific problems should utilize the broadest and most inclusive definition of a problem as the criterion for city participation, rather than a city's geographic location or size. - 64 - RS -2. Local Government Aid and State Funding to Cities (A) (cont'd) Cities are critically dependent on state funding to reduce property tax burdens in their communities. During the early and mid- 1980s, state appropriations for local government aid did not keep pace with the cost of providing services:. The freezing of 1988 LGA payments added to cities' fiscal stress. Changes in the structure of the homestead credit program may lead to further limits on property tax relief for cities. Other economic challenges facing cities include declining tax bases, cuts in'federal support (particularly the elimination of general revenue sharing), costs growing faster than the general inflation rate, and the need to implement state and federal mandates. It is important to put our current property tax relief financing structure into some historical perspective. Tax and government financing reforms enacted over the past two decades dramatically shifted the mechanisms for raising revenue away from local governments and toward the state. With passage of the 1967 Tax Reform and Relief Act, the 1971 Omnibus Tax bill (the so- called "Minnesota Miracle"), and later tax legislation, the state obligated itself to lower property tax burdens by levying increased sales and income taxes. The increased sales and income tax revenue was to be used by the state to partially replace the property tax. The state was to assume a larger share of the costs of delivering local government services. As a trade -off for providing aid to local governments, the state imposed levy limits on local governments and took away their authority to levy local sales or income taxes. -Local governments were thus encouraged to rely more on state - collected revenue. Given the continued constraints placed on the taxing abilities of local governments and the 'state's original commitment to provide property tax relief, the League believes it would be wholly unfair to reduce state funding for cities. The maintenance of property tax relief should be a high priority. Policy makers must recognize that any cuts in funding for cities will.likely result in higher property tax levels and cuts in needed city services. For nearly two decades, the state has appropriately assumed a role in reducing property tax burdens. A long- standing commitment for such relief has been made to both the public and municipalities. The state must not renege on that promise. RS -3. Elimination of Levy Limits (B The League recommends that the Legislature fulfill its commitment to repeal the city levy limit laws by 1992, especially in light of the 1990 reductions in state aid to cities and new truth in taxation requirements. Removal of levy limits would enhance local accountability and allow cities to plan for and respond to changing financial conditions, particularly declines in federal and state aid, and the increasing costs of mandates. - 65 - RS -3. Elimination of Levv Limits (B) (cont'd In 1989 the Legislature once again imposed extremely stringent levy limits on cities. These levy limits are severely limiting cities' abilities to compensate for cuts in federal financial aid as well as making it nearly impossible to deal with rising costs resulting from various state mandates, such as comparable worth. The legislature should avoid calculating levy limits based on what a city actually levied in the prior year, rather than on what a city was authorized to levy in the previous year. This tightening pf the levy limit base can have the unfortunate effect of encouraging cities to levy to their maximum limit in order to preserve their future levying authority. As long as such stringent levy limits are continued, then the Legislature should: 1. Allow cities to maintain their levy bases without having to levy to the maximum; 2. Restore the full inflation adjustment (measured by the state and local implicit price.deflator) and a full adjustment for population or household growth, whichever is greater; 3. Reinstate the special levies that previously existed (including a special levy for libraries and allow new special levies to cover the costs of mandated programs (for example,. comparable worth); and 4..Provide for an appeals process and not reduce levying authority for cities which have unused reserve appeals.. In addition, the League opposes requiring that special levies be ,excluded from cities' general levy bases. Such a measure would reduce cities' financial flexibility and encourage cities to levy to their maximum limit. Levy limits have made it difficult for many cities to adequately plan for, and respond to, changing conditions. Federal cutbacks, rising insurance costs, costs of comparable worth salary adjustments, and other factors force cities to adjust their budgets and levies. Levy limits prevent some cities from using property taxes as a source of revenue to provide for adequate reserves or absorb increased costs. Local elected officials are accountable to the public and should be entrusted to responsibly use their taxing authority. Cities exist in a very dynamic, changing environment. They are expected to quickly respond to changing federal policies, state mandates, court rulings and market forces. Statewide limits artificially constrain the options available to elected officials and are too inflexible. RS -3. Elimination of Levy Limits (B) (cont'd) Given uncertainties in state and federal financial aids, and the diverse problems and circumstances faced by cities, levy limits are ' unworkable. These limits are inconsistent with the principles of local self- government and accountability and should therefore be ? repealed. RS -4. Truth in Taxation (B The League recommends improvements in the truth in taxation law designed to make the process meaningful for property taxpayers and workable for cities and other local units of government.. The League believes that all levels of,local government (including counties and school districts) as well as the state government should be required to follow similar truth in taxation requirements for public hearings on budget and tax issues. The Legislature should make changes in the following areas. 1. Now that truth in taxation is in place, levy limits should be abolished. If the Legislature continues to impose restrictive le limits, then only cities which need to exceed their levy limits should be required to go throu h the truth in taxation process. 2. Parcel- specific truth in taxation notices should be required as soon as possible in all counties so that the precise impact of budget and levy decisions on individual taxpayers' bills are displayed. State funds should be,appropriated to finance compliance with this _.state mandate: Under current law, most counties (except Hennepin, Ramsey, and St. Louis) are required to produce a general notice that only indicates the proposed levy (after reduction by LGA) and the percent increase or decrease from the previous year's levy. In many cases, such statements will mislead taxpayers about the effects of levy changes on their property tax bills. Only a parcel- specific notice can avoid misleading taxpayers. . 3. Local governments should be allowed to amend the levy that they preliminarily propose to the county auditor on September 1 In addition, the truth in taxation process should apply only to a local unit's levies, not its total budget. Truth in taxation requires budget adoption and levy certification by September 1. Many cities will have a difficult time realistically assessing their budget needs that far in advance of the beginning of the budget year. The early certification date, in combination with the rule that prevents the city's final levy from exceeding its preliminary September 1 estimate, could work against responsible budgeting and force cities to overestimate their budget needs in order to avoid potential revenue shortfalls. 4. Since truth in taxation notices must be sent to each parcel of property, local units should not be required to publish newspaper advertisements. - 67 - RS -4. Truth in Taxation (B) (cont'd) 5. The method for calculating the proposed tax increases shown on taxpayer truth in taxation notices should reflect as accurately as possible the actual year -to -year increases or decreases occurring in taxpayers' tax bills. 6. A city should be allowed to use its official newspaper to publish notification of a recessed truth in taxation hearing, as long as that newspaper is one of general interest and readership in the community. 7. Property tax statements reflect the amount of state ided to homeowners should accurately property tax relief provided for the parcel of property. For example, a "homestead credits amounts are not Committee report.) tificial.calculations of acceptable. (From Coordinating RS -5. Sales and Motor Vehicle Excise Tax Extension (B The League opposes forcing local governments to pav the six percent sales and motor vehicle excise tax on their purchases. Forcing local governments to pay the state sales tax means one level of government is taxing another. This increased sales tax will directly result in increased local property taxes. In 1987, the governor proposed extending the six percent sales and motor vehicle excise tax to purchases made by cities and other local government. units. While rejecting the sales tax proposal, the Legislature did accept the motor vehicle excise tax plan, effective with city purchases of vehicles made after May 31, 1987. This excise tax, however, does not apply to public safety vehicles. RS -6. State Administrative Costs (B) The League strongly opposes deducting state administrative costs from funds appropriated for.property tax relief. In addition, if a state agency is required to recover costs through a state char a -back for services to local units, then during administrative hearings the state should be required to justify their charges on the basis of the services provided to the individual local unit. All state government costs should be subject to the standard appropriation review process and be funded directly by specific state appropriation, not by a broad deduction from property tax relief programs. While decisions on the necessary staffing and funding levels for state agencies are made by the appropriations committees, tax'policy decisions should be handled by the tax committees. When state administrative costs are financed through the local government aid (LGA) appropriation, funds available for property tax relief are reduced, defeating the purpose of LGA. In 1990, such RS -6. State Administrative Costs (B) (cont'd) state costs included the unprecedented large sum of $460,000 to fund the state auditor's - office and certain department of administration f functions related to local government. In the case of the state auditor's office, earmarked deductions from LGA are being used to f' finance over 40 percent of the auditor's state - appropriated budget, an inappropriate action in the League's opinion. Furthermore, LGA funds are.being used to finance auditor and department of administration operations which do not relate to cities, but to all local governments -- counties, school districts, and townships. The LGA program is largely designed for and used by cities. Other state programs -- county income disparity aids, school aids -- largely benefit other units of local government. The League believes it is wholly inappropriate and unfair to almost exclusively tap city funds for programs which relate to all units of local government. In order to promote a cohesive and coordinated state tax policy and provide for adequate review of proposed state agency costs, it is recommended that no state agency's administrative costs be deducted from property tax relief funds. This will allow the tax committees to fully determine the level of property tax relief to be provided. RS -7. Stabilitv of State Revenues lB The League urges adoption of fiscal and revenue policies that will stabilize state revenues and thereby lead to more predictable funding levels for local governments. Inevitably, the stability of revenues flowing to local governments is dependent on the stability of revenues flowing to the state. In this regard, the League supports the establishment of a permanent budget reserve equal to a minimum of five percent of total state outlays. As soon as possible, the reserve should be built up to a more adequate level in excess of five percent of outlays. The reserve should be built up during years of economic prosperity and used only to protect the.state budget from unexpected economic downturns, not for tax reductions or expenditure increases. Such a budget reserve is necessary, given the relatively volatile tax bases on which the state currently relies (particularly the income tax and sales tax), and the potential for error.in revenue and economic forecasting. In recent years the uncertainty of the state -local fiscal relationship has made short and long -term financial planning almost impossible at the local level. During the earlier part of this decade, local jurisdictions were left with severe revenue shortfalls and cash flow problems because of the sharp and unexpected decline in state revenue. State aids to local jurisdictions were cut substantially and aid payments were delayed, often in the middle of RS -7. Stability of State Revenues (B) (cont'd) the budget year, when compensating action was nearly impossible. In addition, cities have been unable to plan their budgets with any degree of confidence given the major year -to -year changes that have occurred in the overall funding level for local government aid in the formula used to distribute local government aid, in levy limit laws, M and in state property tax relief programs. Cities need to be able to rely on predictable revenue sources that will be adequate to maintain the level of services required by their citizens. Should problems with budget shortfalls persist even after establishment of a budget reserve, the Legislature should consider the following additional policy options to stabilize state revenues, including: * Broadening the sales tax base. Broadening the sales tax base could lead to more stable revenues. * Temporary suspension of indexing of the state income tax structure or temporary increases in other. taxes (such as the sales or income. tax) in the event of a sizable budget shortfall. The League supports an automatic increase in income and corporate tax rates when the budget reserve is forecast to fall below $150 million. * Refraining from further income or sales tax reductions unless it is certain that budget shortfalls will not materialize. RS -8. Sales Ratio Issues (B The League urges the Legislature to require that appraisals be used rather than a countywide average, for determining the sales ratio in small communities where few sales occur. Various state formulas consider property tax base valuation in distributing aid. Sales ratios are calculated for each jurisdiction by comparing actual selling prices of properties to the estimated market value assigned by the assessor. These sales ratios are used to equalize assessed values so that all local governments are treated fairly and not rewarded or punished based on their assessment practices. Sales ratios are thus important determinants of the level of state aid received by a community. Yet, in small communities, there are often not enough sales in a given class of property to permit an accurate determination of a sales ratio. In these cases, a countywide Average is applied. The county average, however, may be overly influenced by sales in a larger regional center and thus may not accurately reflect the experience of smaller cities. - 70 - RS -9. License Fees (C The Legislature should repeal all maximum fee provisions relating to r off -sale liquor,..on -sale wine, bottle club, and Sunday liquor licenses, and allow cities to decide locally the appropriate fee to charge for such licenses. With few exceptions, the statutes granting authority to issue licenses or permits do not specify maximum fees. Cities should have the discretion . to set fees based on their own costs, needs, and standards. Case law provides ample limitations on cities' power to set license fees.by requiring that revenues produced must be related to the cost of issuing the license and regulating the licensed business. It is inappropriate.for. the Legislature to set maximum fees for` off -sale liquor,.'_on -sale wine, bottle club, and Sunday liquor license fees. Cities have acted responsibly in setting on-sale liquor license fees. It makes no sense to grant them that power but deny them the.power to set fees for off -sale liquor, on -sale wine, bottle club, and Sunday liquor licenses. There is no evidence to show that lifting the statutory cap would lead to unjustified fee increases. Some reasonable increases in off -sale license fees could be expected since the statutory.maximum fee has not been increased in over 30 years. ` RS -10. Service Fees for Government -Owned Property (C) State, county, school district, city, and regional governments should be required to reimburse cities for the cost of police, fire, and street services. This policy is intended as enabling legislation to grant cities the local option,to impose such fees. One of the glaring inequities in the Minnesota tax system involves local services that are provided free to tax - exempt property owned or used by the state, counties, school districts, cities, and regional government bodies. It is widely acknowledged that such properties directly benefit from government services such as police and fire protection and street services provided by cities. Since there is no legal basis for claiming reimbursement for the costs of such services, they are borne by the local taxpayers. Furthermore, such property is concentrated in certain cities, resulting in a. heavy and disproportionate cost burden upon those cities. Special assessments against state property: Current law (M.S. 435.19), provides for the collection of special assessments from other governmental jurisdictions. The law allows the governmental unit which owns the property to determine the amount of assessment to be paid, as well as the timing of the payment. This is impractical since it often results in interim financing by the local unit of government.. Governmentally owned property should be - 71 - RS -10. Service Fees for Government -Owned Property C cont'd assessed in a manner similar to the assessment of privately owned property. Any law authorizing the state or other governmental units, to refuse to pay the assessed amount, or determine the time and amount of the payment, should be repealed. RS -11. State Audits and City Financial Reporting Requirements lC The League supports continuation of the existing auditing and financial reporting requirements for cities There is no need to rewire cities under 2,500 to follow more rigorous accounting requirements than presently exist or to have annual audits Additionally, the state auditor should not be given the power or responsibility to audit local governments or their instrumentalities The League supports requirements that copies of local audits be sent to the state auditor on a regular basis The private sector is fully competent to conduct governmental audits and may be more economical and practical than a state agency. Minnesota has one.of the most modern and rigorous systems of oversight of municipal finances in the nation. The state auditor currently reviews annual financial reports of all cities. Cities over 2,500 must have annual audits and the state auditor has the authority to audit a city upon receipt of a petition. - 72 - ` League of Minnesota Cities Policy FL -1. FL -2. FL -3. FL -4. FL -5. FL -6. FL -.7. FL -8. FL -9. FL -10. FL -11. 183 University Ave. East St. Paul, MN 55101.2526 (612) 227.5600 (FAX: 221.0986) FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE Drug Abuse: Prevention and Assistance Transportation Federal /Local Fiscal Relations. Rural Development Cable Television Regulation Housing Priorities Homelessness /Housing Issues Federal Mandates Solid Waste Management Highway and Airport Trust Funds .Refugee Assistance - 73 - League of Minnesota Cities 183 University Ave. East St. Paul, MN 55101 -2526 (612) 227.5600 (FAX: 221 -0986) FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE FL -1. Drug Abuse: Prevention and Assistance The League of Minnesota CitiPC act and urges the federal provide assistance to loc community organizations resources to combat the government in partnership with cities to al law enforcement a encies, courts, schools, treatment facilities, and other local znreaz or a abuse and related crime. City officials urge that efforts be made at the federal level to encourage coordination and cooperation at state and local levels to increase the effectiveness of measures to deal with the grievous personal, social, and economic consequences of drug abuse. City officials realize the need for reasonable controls to assure accountability in the use of federal funds. It is also important federal grant requirements remain flexible and complicated grant application procedures.be kept to a minimum. In view of federal budget constraints the League urges Congress, in concert with state and local government, to support efforts to strengthen the capacity and improve the effectiveness of local law enforcement agencies, both urban and rural, to combat drug trafficking and other-illegal activities that threaten neighborhoods and the safety of city streets and homes. It is also necessary for the federal government to intensify U.S. and international efforts to reduce the agricultural and manufacturing sources of illicit drugs in other nations. Strategies to reduce the supply and demand for drugs must be clearly defined with realistic objectives to assure that goals can be achieved. It is essential that Congress provide a consistent stable source of funding for federal grant programs and permit sufficient flexibility at the local level to allow cities to make use of funds in a timely and effective manner. Past experience demonstrates it is difficult to implement effective local strategies when restrictive and complicated grant application procedures are imposed and funding levels are inconsistent. Instances of alcohol abuse among youth are equally alarming and are particulary difficult to eradicate. Information along with experience at state and local levels provide an increased understanding of substance abuse problems and permit local officials to design programs to address the problems in their communities. It is also increasingly evident that serious economic problems and cultural differences with - 75 - FL -1. Drug Abuse: Prevention and Assistance (cont'd) city populations create problems which must also be overcome to reduce the spread of drug and alcohol abuse. Obstacles for individuals at highest risk of addiction must also be recognized to reduce distrust and lack of confidence in government- sponsored actions. a FL -2. Transportation The League of Minnesota Cities'supports redirection of national transportation priorities to: * Improve commuter mobility, traffic congestion, air quality, and energy conservation; * Increase investment in technologies that offer solutions to the problems resulting from dependence on movement of vehicles including research and development of transportation alternatives; * Allocate federal funds to principal arterials to relieve interstate highway congestion; * Include metro and non -metro (primary) highway systems designated the Metropolitian Council in the national highway classification systems in Minnesota; * Increase reliance on movement of people by providing incentives to commuters to use mass transit or highway transportation alternatives; an . * Maintain federal investment in transportation on a long -term basis. The completion of the federal interstate highway system signals a critical turning point in the 70 -year relationship of federal, state, and local governments in surface transportation programs. when the surface transportation assistance act expires at the end of FY1911 federal highway and transit programs must be restructured to respond to new directions for the movement of people and commodities. The League strongly advocates the continued direct involvement of city officials in the development of new directions for a national surface transportation program. The League agrees that the Transportation Advisory Group (TAG) has correctly identified the following key elements of a restructured federal transportation program: * Mutual agreement by federal, state, and local government on the levels of federal funding for all categories of federal highway programs - -4R (interstate repair, reconstruction, and rehabilitation and renovation); BRR (bridge replacement and repair); rural; and urban /suburban. * Increased recognition of the importance of rural as well as urban transportation investments that directly benefit development of investments in agriculture, tourism, and industry; - 76 - FL -2. Transportation (cont'd) • Mandatory pass- through of funds for urban /suburban roads to cities or # metropolitan planning organizations for areas above 200,000 population; * Separate and prominent transit program and removal of barriers to intermodal, interagency, and public /private cooperation; • Flexible transfer of highway and transit funds to meet local needs, to encourage innovative approaches to emerging urban and suburban mobility problems; * Increasing incentives for increased transit ridership; * Increasing integration of transportation modes for.freight linkages to railheads, ports, and-markets; * Single authorization of transit programs including designation of funds for discretionary uses;., * More emphasis on management of transportation demand through the use of high occupancy vehicle lanes (HOVs), ridesharing, traffic signal timing, ramp metering, staggered work hours, and other transportation management techniques; and. * Immediate draw down of the balance and accumulated interest -in federal highway and airport trust funds and the return of those revenues to maintain highway, airport, and transit systems. The League recognizes the important role of the Center for Transportation Studies (CTS) at the University of Minnesota in conducting research studies to.better understand the role of . transportation in maintaining competitive regional'and state economies. The effect of transportation on the survival of rural communities and the impact on the growth of key industries are important areas of study identified by CTS for 1989 -90. Study of these and other issues (such as improving the.useful life of road surfaces and bridge superstructure) will -help define where federal, state, and local dollars can effectively be allocated. FL -3. Federal /Local Fiscal Relations Municipal Financing Issues: The League of Minnesota Cities supports the authoritv of cities to issue tax - exempt municipal bonds and opposes federal intrusion on such local government policy when such restrictions result in higher issuance costs, loss in investor incentives in the construction and preservation of affordable housing, or increase tax liability for general obliaation or municipal revenue bond interest. - 77 - FL -3. Federal /Local Fiscal Relations (cont'd The League urges Congress to eliminate restrictions which reduce or limit- the'authority of cities to use tax - exempt financing and to resist further efforts to intrude on local bonding authority. The League supports actions of the House Ways & Means Committee to broaden rehabilitation tax credits to give investors incentive to restore and preserve affordable housing. The League affirms its support of tax - exempt financing to provide low- and moderate - income housing tax credits. The League supports the three -year extension of those credits proposed in the 189 House tax legislation. In addition, the League supports action to make low- income housing tax credits more workable by making full tax credit available for projects in which cities use tax - exempt financing or community development block grant (CDBG) funds. Congress must not use the 1988 U.S. Supreme Court action which removed the tax immunity of municipal bond interest as an opportunity to impose new costs on cities or to hinder the ability of local governments to finance needed improvements and strengthen the local economy. Further, the League urges Congress to restore the private use test on issues of less than $25 million to 25 percent (from the current level of 10 percent), expand qualifications for exemption from bank and arbitrage deductibility, and maintain the current limit on the authority of non- profit corporations to issue tax - exempt bonds. Federal regulation of municipal bonds should not require unnecessary reporting. Failure to report bond issues to federal regulatory' agencies should not result in taxation of interest income to the city. The League also opposes retroactive arbitrage and rebate liability for tax - exempt bonds issued after enactment of the 1986 tax reform act. Those requirements result in increased costs to cities in financing necessary public improvements. No federal arbitrage restrictions should apply to municipal bond reserves or sinking funds. Arbitrage which results from fluctuating interest rates, issuance procedures, prudent management of the bond issue, or refundings should not be subject to retroactive tax liability. Single - Family Mortgage Bonds: The League urges Congress to extend cities' authority to issue single-family mortgage revenue bonds until December 31, 1994, and to oppose recapture provisions. Mortgage revenue bonds (MRBs) should be continued and the authority to issue such bonds extended for at least three more years to support redevelopment and to aid homebuyers in purchasing housing which they could not otherwise afford. FL -3. Federal /Local Fiscal Relations (cont'd)- The League believes it is reasonable to limit MRBs based on household incomes and.provisions to target MRBs to areas where 50 percent or more of the families have incomes of 80''percent or less of the statewide median as well as to areas of severe economic distress. Previous congressional efforts to restrict MRBs have threatened the availability of MRBs by requiring the recapture of a portion of the interest subsidy received by the buyer if the home is sold within five years. The recapture provision and the effective dates of the proposed limits threaten to impose strict tax liability on bond issuers and place unreasonable costs on qualified first -time home buyers.. The purpose of the program is to provide homeownership opportunities to buyers with.limited income to allow greater housing flexibility as family conditions change and to give families a means to build home equity. Proposed effective dates for recapture provisions could cause problems, including possible disclosure requirements for issuers of bonds with outstanding mortgage funds. The restrictions would also hamper future bond sales because it would be necessary to have regulations in place prior to the sale of any bonds to be sold after the effective date of such requirements. Modifications of Excise Tax.Payments: The League urges Congress to repeal 1987 tax provisions that require cities to pay gasoline and diesel excise taxes and apply for rebates ...,from the federal government. ?While su orting amendments to permit wholesalers to sell tax-free-gas and diesel fuel to cities, the Lea urges repeal of intrusion on cities' exemption from such federal taxes. Cities must, at the very least, be accorded similar treatment with farmers and boatowners, who have been granted the protection of tax - exemption for fuel purchases._ The impact of the current law is particularly harsh on operating.budgets and record - keeping responsibilities of small cities. .The law increases.the cost of providing essential services including police, fire, and emergency response. Non- elected Deferred Compensation: The League urges continued support for legislation to define bona fide employee benefits and to clarify that benefits such as sick and vacation leave would only be taxed when received, not when accrued. - 79 - FL -4. Rural Development The Lea ue urges Congress to ap rove the rural partnership act of 1989 (S. 1036) to strengthen the capacity of cities to deliver basic services in rural areas. It is unnecessa to create new entities to provide development, water and sewer facilities, and to re air and improve local infrastructure - t The legislation authorizes a revolving loan fund for local business development in rural areas in combination with required state and local matching funds. Federal loan protection for banks granting loans to rural businesses will also stimulate expansion of local firms and economic growth. The League supports and affirms the importance of such measures to stimulate rural economic growth. The League has serious reservations about other provisions of the act which authorizes the Rural Electricification Administration (REA) to work with local rural electrical cooperatives to develop rural water and sewer facilities. The legislation would provide $40 million in loan funds for this purpose. Cities that have insufficient local tax bases to cover the cost of sewer and water utility improvements face difficulties in obtaining limited federal grant and loan funds now available for this purpose. The League rejects measures that threaten to reduce the current level of such assistance available directly to cities through Environmental Protection Agency wastewater treatment and clean water grant and loan programs. Further, it is important to maintain a direct and clear relationship between the federal level of government and cities in -rural areas. The danger of unplanned ex -urban development creates problems for rural areas. Rural fringe development can consume limited resources, weaken local economies, and place rural communities at a disadvantage for, encouraging development and maintaining essential services. It is unnecessary to expand the role of the REA to accomplish the objectives of the rural partnership act. The statement of the American Public Power Association to the House Subcommittee on Consservation, Credit and Rural Development correctly identifies the critical challenges facing cities in rural areas -- survival of basic employment, health care, and community services. With higher unemployment and poverty rates, it is necessary to strengthen rural communities not weaken them by encouraging development of service delivery and scattered commercial and residential areas away from population centers. While rural electric cooperatives are publicly owned and locally controlled,, they are not directly accountable to residents of our smaller cities, while city governments are the basic responsible unit of government closest to the people and subject to the voters. It is essential that city officials and utility system operators work in a coordinated manner to use locally generated revenues to meet shared public service. objectives. Cities already make use of such user fees to avoid higher property tax levies. The authority of locally elected city officials to make such decisions and to take responsibility for management must be maintained in any new initiatives. ,r W s FL -5. Cable Television Regulation The League of Minnesota Cities urges of the 1984 cable communications pol regulation of cable franchise operat ress to re- examine provisions act that affect local sand services. The L also has a strong interest in achieving a more appropri between local authority to mandate access to cable commu services for city residents and the opportunity for the to effectivelv compete with broadcast television and the telecommunications industr ate e _ague Lance ions indu LMC supports the following changes in the 1984 cable communications policy act to- * Permit telephone companies to own and operate cable systems subject to city regulation on the same terms and conditions that apply to local regulation of other cable franchise operations; * Assure that rural areas have access through satellite broadcast and other competing technologies to services available on cable systems; * Improve leased access requirements to provide a set - aside of channel capacity for use by commercial programmers not connected with the cable operator as well as by public and educational institutions; * Assure that local commercial broadcast stations will continue to have access to cable channels in order to provide locally originated programming and news programs of local interest; * Establish a legislative definition of effective competition to authorize local rate regulation if comparable alternative television programming.and services are not available to city residents.at rates competitive with those charged by the cable operator; * Broaden discretion in franchise renewal proceedings to eliminate requirements that make it necessary for city officials to disprove that, prior to renewal, the city had previously acknowledged and tolerated violations of the original franchise agreement; * Require payments by cable franchise operators to support the operation of public, educational, and government access (PEG) channels; * Authorize cities to establish and enforce local technical standards to assure the quality of local cable signals; * Provide cities with increased authority over modification procedures and timetables to'permit effective enforcement of existing franchise agreements during pending modification proceedings; * Authorize cities to establish minimum service requirements when requesting proposals from cable franchise operators to assure access to programming that meets local needs; - 81 - FL -5. Cable Television Re ulation cont'd * Require city regulation of the placement and numbering of local broadcast signals and other program services to prevent re- tiering . of basic services; * Guarantee blanket immunity for actions taken by the city consistent With the cable communications policy act; and * Protect the entity operating public access facilities from liability. If the U.S. Supreme Court determines that the cable television industry has broad rights to control program content, distribution, and access to cable systems, the following measures may also be necessary for the protection of local interests: * Prohibit common ownership of cable program networks and cable systems (vertical integration) to prevent concentration of ownership and control of programming, distribution, and access to cable channels; * Require expansion of capacity of the cable system to respond to future demand for channel access; * Require cable operators to make channel capacity available on a first -come, first- served basis; and * Eliminate the five percent limit on franchise fees and permit city franchise authorities to establish fees without federal interference. FL -6. ous"iling Priorities The Lea ue of Minnesota Cities sorts new federal housin o u l islati t ncrea Erect federal fundin for affordable housing to cities. The League also ur es Con ress to retain a block rant ro ram as an essential element of new federal housin olic to target needed federal revenues to help cities m t �ousina nee ee critical local The League agrees with the four basic principles recognized by the national affordable housing act. * Cities, states, and non- profit organizations should play a central role in the establishment of an effective national housing policy; LMC opposes any efforts to entitle community -based organizations to receive CDBG grants as direct grantees. The League believes that all parties interested in improving-and preserving low- income housing should be encouraged to work together and that CDBG funds be made available to cities for such purposes. * Federal resources should be targeted to cities on the basis of local needs. IT f. FL -6. Housing Priorities (cont'd) * Limited federal funds should be used to support extensive private investment, * Federal coordination of tax and spending policies should be better coordinated to make housing affordable for low- and moderate - income households. Federal housing policy should address the critical problems faced by the poor who are without safe and affordable housing and the dilemma of moderate - income families unable to afford to purchase their own homes. Congress should address the need for modernization and rehabilitation of our public housing stock." The Cranston- D'Amato legislation represents a bipartisan effort to address critical housing needs throughout the nation.. Cities should be the prime eligible recipients of housing grant,action program (GAP) funds under Title I of the legislation in order to provide rental, single-family, cooperative, and special needs housing. It is important that cities be able to count on federal funding of 70 percent of the cost of housing as provided in the proposed federal GAP program. It is equally important for cities themselves to be eligible recipients of those grants where a.local match is provided. .LMC believes it is important to link the eligibility for receipt of challenge grants (also to be provided under Title I) to the state's agreement to provide matching funds directly.to localities on the basis of needs established in direct consultation and participation by city housing and elected.officials. Cities should be able to rely on continued federal matching funds over time. The distribution of federal housing funds should be made available on the basis of a formula that includes population, income, and poverty, and'-the condition and utilization of housing stock, state fiscal capacity, and an affordability index which compares both homeownership and rental housing costs to low and moderate household- income levels. Differences in local' (city) fiscal capacity, composition of city housing stock, and population /income characteristics.should make it possible to provide adequate federal resources to help meet local housing needs. Congress should also address the failure of the distribution formula to recognize that most housing is provided through local activity between cities and non - profit organizations. The formula should provide increased funding directly to cities. The national competition proposed for 20 percent of the housing opportunity program (HOP) funding should be re- examined to assure that smaller cities are not faced with unfair competition for limited funds. The state grant action plan should include a process in which city officials directly take part. Provisions for eligibility for FL -6. Housing Priorities (cont'd) challenge grants that require "project specific" action plans should identify representation of city officials in the development of the ; mandated state plan. The League is encouraged by the inclusion of proposals calling for the creation of a tax and housing policy coordinating council to encourage and promote federal tax policy which supports and is coordinated with national housing legislation. It would be useful to examine congressional tax and housing legislative policy authority to.bring the two aspects of federal policy development into a more direct and formal relationship. The League supports improvements in provisions that call for centralized decision - making and categorical programs that do not provide sufficient flexibility to enable states and cities to design housing policy to match local market conditions and to provide ample and adaptable-financial assistance. The National League of Cities' concern for the proposed creation of a housing opportunities corporation (HOCA) and the housing opportunity program (HOP) is worth further examination since these new institutions would duplicate the functions and duties of already existing agencies. FL -7. Homelessness/Housing Issues The League of Minnesota Cities supports full funding of federal Assistance programs for emergency, long-term assistance and reventive measures to aid cities to meet the needs of homeless families and individuals. The League also urges Con r federal /local partnerships in providing a level to reduce risks of homelessness. s to strengthen ordable housing at the local Congressional action to reauthorize the Stewart B. McKinney homeless ' assistance act is encouraging in light of previous federal action to restore FY188 budget cuts in homeless assistance programs. Restoration of funding levels for emergency shelter grants, Section 8 moderate income, and SRO rehabilitation programs continues to be important to cities in local efforts to provide housing services. Demonstration supportive housing programs and supplemental assistance, along with health care and mental health block grants, emergency food and shelter, and emergency service grants, should continue to be funded. Long -term federal assistance to the homeless should include a firm commitment to financing low- income housing programs such as Section 8 new construction and substantial rehabilitation programs, Farmers Home Administration housing loans, and other federal elderly and handicapped housing assistance for those in poverty. Measures that promote maintenance and rehabilitation of low income housing for families and individuals are also important strategies to reduce homelessness. Programs are needed to support availability of FL -7. Homelessness /Housing Issues (cont'd) such housing in rural areas as well. Tax incentives for construction and rehabilitation of low- income housing must be continued and improved '.6 to make it possible for cities to effectively respond to such housing needs. The lack of adequate community mental health services also aggravates the .increase in the number of persons who are homeless. The needs of vulnerable individuals remain a major concern for local officials. The federal government must work with states and cities.to improve eligibility for health care, long -term transitional housing, food stamps, and other federally subsidized benefits to assist such individuals. FL -8. Federal Mandates The League of Minnesota Cities urges Congress to enact legislation to provide reimbursement to cities for the direct costs of compliance with federal policies, regulations, and national standards that impose additional costs and responsibilities on city government. Congress should also address the need for flexibility in implementing federal programs and limit the fiscal impact and overburden on local government. The League acknowledges the important role of the federal government in addressing issues of national concern. It is equally important, however, that federal legislation which imposes increased .responsibilities and duties on cities also address the impact of such requirements .at the local level. In recent years, the federal government has largely overlooked the fact that such mandates often require cities to use local revenues to cover the cost of compliance ..with such national standards. Disparities in local fiscal.capacity and the.adverse effects of federal mandates on local government are indisputable evidence of the need for Congress to take seriously the need to,take better account of the local impact of mandates. City officials are justifiably alarmed at the prospect of the increased costly responsibilities and regulations imposed by the federal government at a time of declining levels of federal aid to cities. Among current and pending federal policies, the following have direct and substantial fiscal impact on cities: * Medicare coverage for currently exempt city employees; * Federal gas and diesel fuel tax liability; * Distribution of retirement benefits to public employees prior to retirement; * Medicare coverage for election judges; * Restrictions on local municipal bond authority; * Water and air quality standards; and * Incinerator ash disposal requirements. FL -8. Federal Mandates (cont'd) Members of Congress should work with local officials to determine how to limit the fiscal and other overburdens of such requirements on the *operation of city government. N '0 Further, the League supports an assessment of current federal ' h programs, regulations, and policies to determine the extent of adverse cost, structural, and intergovernmental impacts on cities. The League supports federal legislation to require that cost impact statements (fiscal notes) be included on all federal legislative proposals, rules, and regulations prior to enactment or enforcement. Traditionally, city officials have agreed to comply with federal requirements associated with the distribution of federal aid to local government, federal housing assistance, community development block grants, wastewater treatment construction grants, etc. In recent years, however, congressional policymaking in response to changing national priorities has often resulted in shifting new duties and responsibilities to the local level without a corresponding increase in federal revenue to cities or the expansion of local authority to raise revenues to.pay for those new mandates. FL -9. Solid Waste Management The League of Minnesota Cities strongly urges Congress to establish a nati_onal program of environmental priorities including resource recovery, recycling, source reduction, and environmentally safe disposal of solid waste. The following measures are needed to the environment and to make it feasible for cities to carry out responsibility for solid waste disposal at the local level rotect *-Establish packaging standards for manufacturers, distributors, and retailers and require all new products and packaging to be non- toxic, recyclable,,and /or biodegradable; * ''Authorize the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to require industry to eliminate toxic, non - recyclable, and /or non - biodegradable products and packaging; * Provide funding and other assistance to expand the market fo recyclables; r * Restore favorable tax treatment for financing of resource recovery facilities, landfills, and recycling centers * Develop national recycling goals and initiatives; * Provide funding for pilot recycling programs to assist cities to develop new recycling methods and programs; * Develop siting criteria for waste disposal facilities; FL -9. Solid Waste Management (cont'd) * Regulate resource recovery and ash emissions through a permitting process that requires periodic monitoring and achievable emission controls; ±'1 * Require retrofitting of existing incinerators only to correct major pollution problems not recognized at the time of construction or to require installation of available, cost - effective new technologies; * Designate incinerator ash as a special waste and establish testing and treatment requirements along with development of flexible methods of ash disposal for residue that has been tested or' treated; and * Establish design criteria for ash monofills to be used for untreated or toxic ash. Further, the federal government should develop options for solid waste disposal and assist local government in implementing cost - effective programs to reduce the chance of future environmental damage from waste disposal methods. Source reduction also plays a critical part in management of increasing costs of disposal. Congress should establish packaging standards for manufacturers, distributors, and retailers to reduce the volume and pollution problems associated with toxic and non - biodegradable materials. Removal of toxic, non - recyclable, or non- biodegradable.packaging and products should be a major focus -of a national solid waste management policy. Development of integrated strategies that use source reduction, recycling, resource recovery, and landfilling is required. LMC supports National League of Cities development of a national solid waste management policy for cities to provide management options that allow cities to meet local needs. FL -10. Highway and Airport Trust Funds The League of Minnesota Cities urges Congress to use accumulated unspent user-generated revenues in the highway and airport and airwa trust funds to finance highway and airport development and improvements. In order to ensure that such user fees are used to benefit urbanized areas and to benefit airport needs and customers, LMC supports removal of the highway trust fund and the airport and airway trust funds from the unified federal budget. Congress should permit the use of uncommitted surpluses for airport noise abatement and local sanctioned airport improvements. Highway trust funds should be distributed to assure that urbanized areas may use available funds. If such funds are not utilized for eligible categorical programs, then the level of the user fees should be reduced. FL -10. Highway and Airport Trust Funds (cont'd) Highway obligations and spending accumulation of unspent revenues and localities. Any uncommitted by increasing authorization leve increased portion of funds to be abatement projects. FL -11. Refugee Assistance should not be restricted to permit that should be returned to states airport user fees should be expended Ls for eligible programs, including an set aside to fund airport noise The League of Minnesota Cities urges Congress to support the following refugee policies. 1. State and local governments have no control over the federal decisions that admit refugees. Refugees are a federal responsibility. * The federal government should have responsibility to provide both resources and leadership to help local governments cope with the result of these federal decisions. z, -a 'tip x * The federal government should develop a cohesive policy to address and alleviate the impact of refugee resettlement problems in urban communities. 2. The federal government should make an ongoing fiscal commitment to adequately fund refugee assistance programs. * The refugee,assistance act should be reauthorized and provide 100 percent reimbursement of state costs for the first 36 months a refugee locates in the state. * Federal commitment for funding should be considered at the same time a decision is made for relocation and resettlement. * Local governments that have received significant inflows of Indochinese after the 1980 census should have their population counts for federal programs adjusted immediately. * Other forms of impact aid should be provided. Local governments should immediately-receive appropriate technical assistance and 100 percent reimbursement for costs they incur for the influx of refugee transitioning efforts. * Additional Department of Labor and Housing and'Urban Development resources should be provided to minimize the competition between disadvantaged Americans and refugees for scarce publicly assisted housing resources and employment opportunities. * There should be increased aid to local education programs for thosr communities experiencing large refugee enrollments and demands for English proficiency for adults. FL -11. Refugee Assistance (cont'd). * The federal government should provide funding for reimbursement of case management support for new arrivals in addition to cash and medical assistance to counties. Such programs could include employment training, rental assistance, language acquisition, child care, and aculturation. 3. State and local governments should to coordinate all refugee assistance efforts. * State and local governments - should be involved in planning for initial refugee placement. Cities should be given timely notification of placement of refugees and the likely secondary migration patterns. * Counties should notify cities immediately upon knowledge of the State Department's decision in order to effectively plan resettlement efforts. - 89 - ;r NOU -06 -1939 15:35 FROH FUEL I C F I N. SYSTEM'S FINANCIAL SYSTEMS TO 512 NI(Y')i.LET MALL. SUITE 550 • MINNEAPOLIS. MINNCNOTA 35402 TELEPHONE; FAk: (61 h t42 -2547 92 1 JV.JG P. GJJ ,=i A 2714 %(%)ND AVENUE K.L. • tTOAR RAPIDS. 10WA 5240 TO E:1111ONE: 0101 $1299709000 G.O. TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1989 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA BBI - 7.24 Moody's Investors Service: *Aal" Standard & Poor's: "AA" 11 , .1 .. FIRST BANK N.A. MINNEAPOLIS 6.00 -1991 DAIN BOSWORTH INCORPORATED 6.10 -1992 NORWEST INVESTMENT SERVICES, 6.15 -1993 INC. 6.20 -1994 PIPER JAFFRAY & HOPWOOD 6.30 -1995 INCORPORATED - 6.40 -1996 THE NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY 6.45 -1997 Allison-Williams Company 6.50 -1998 American National Bank 6.60 -1999 and Trust ' 6.70 -2000 Cronin & Company, In., 6.75 -2001 Chicago - 6.80 -2002 Juran & Moody, Inc. 6.85 -2003 Miller, Johnson and Kuehn, 6.90 -2004 Inc. 7.00 - 2005/06 Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co. Incorporated Baird & Co., Incorporated Craig Hallum Dougherty, Dawkins, Strand & Yost Incorporated John G. Kinnard & Co. Marquette Bank Minneapolis Moore Juran and Company, Inc. M.H. Novick & Company, Inc., Minneapolis Park Investment Corporation Summit Investment Corporation November 6, 1989 $12,833,815.00 $9,372,193.75 6.8639% SHEARSON LEHMAN HUTTON, INC. PRUDENTIAL -BACHE CAPITAL FUNDING SMITH BARNEY, HARRIS UPHAM & CO. DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS, INC. GRIFFIN, KUBIK, STEPHEN$ & THOMPSON, INC. 6.50 - 1991/96 6.55 -1997 6.60 - 1998/99 6.70 - 2000/01 6.75 -2002 6.85 -2003 6.90 -2004 6.95- 2005/06 6.00 -1991 6.10 -1992 6.20 -1993 6.30 -1994 6.40 -1995 6.50 -.1996 6.60 - 1997/98 6.70 -1999 6.80 - 2000/01 6.90 - 2002/03 7.00 - 2004/06 $12,814,360.00 S'1298141360.00 $9,396,130.83 6.8815% 591'483,708.33 6.9456% HARRIS TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK 6.60- 1991/98 $12,814.920.00 59,487,130.00 BEAR, STEARNS & CO. 6.65 -1999 6.9485% KIDDER, PEABODY & CO., CHICAGO 6.75 -2000 Bank of Oklahoma, N.A. 6.85 -2001 Hutchinson, Shockey, Erley 6.95- 2002/06 .& Co. Mercantile Bank N.A. St. Louis Stern Brother & Co. William Blair &.Company Van Kampen Merritt Inc., Lisle A. Webster Dougherty & Co., Inca Illinois Company, Inc.. Prescott, Ball & Turben, Inc., New York These Bonds are Being Reoffered at Par. TOTAL P.04 NOU -06 -1989 15 :35 FROM PUBLIC FIN. SYSTEMS TO City of Edina, Minnesota General Obtigation Tax Inore>neit Refunding Sonde Series 1989 TYPE OF REFUNDING ■ FULL -mss a■ ■cirsn t. Y.�z= xY��— sn■iifi iY.�OCC.�.�=== =a■srs LY S = —sarr x505 SOURCES PROPOSED BOND ISSUE: TOTAL PRINCIPAL 12,970,000.00 DISCOUNT ( -) (136,185.00) PREMItM 0.00 ACCRUED INTEREST 64,949.06 DEBT SERVICE RESERVE FUND 0.00 CASH ON HIND 550,188.17 DEBT SERVICE RESERVE FUND - - -_�� x —rr■ NEW PROJECT FUNDING $13,448,952.23 SINKING FUND DEPOSIT: zz— zzx■■■r■ass USES PRESENT S.L.G.S. 13,331,900.00 UNRESTRICTED INVESTMENTS 0.00 BEGINNING CASH FOR ESCROW 103.17 INSURANCE 0.00 EXPENSES 52,000.00 DEBT SERVICE RESERVE FUND 0.00 NEW PROJECT FUNDING 0.00 SINKING FUND DEPOSIT: u■rrruwsssn■ ACCRUED INTEREST 64,949.06 EXCESS PROCEEDS. 0.00 ... — z— �■ ■ ■ ■■ssim $13,448,952.23 ■aiu■uu■iim sr iYiS sRSrsxxxzs= zs— zsaa■ ar■ ■■ ■urssisRi=xxsx= xxsrursiss= SAVINGS EXISTING DEBT SERVICE PROPOSED DEBT SERVICE ( -) CHANGE IN D.S. RESERVE FUND CASH ON HAND ( -) ACCRUED INTEREST EXCESS PROCEEDS % OF DEBT SERVICE FUTURE PRESENT VALUE VALUE - ..... ........ .. ?3,083,587.50 ............... 13,94x,146.87 (22,206,008.75) 113.034,449.06) - -- 0.00 0.00 (550,188.17) (SS0,188.17) 64,949.06 64,949.06 0.00 0.00 ■■u■rts-iss■u u■rrruwsssn■ $392,339.64 $426,958.70 .■rrr■s■ase■ann :, ■ ■■rrrrssssun ... 3.06% �esanrui■■ m32CLP2—= ;--= �zs■uurmL7FS =z -a—rau iuiESx- =— arrriss EXISTING DEBT SERVICE .............................. PRINCIPAL 811,850,000 BOND YEARS 128,325.000 AVG. MATURITY 10.829 AVG. COUPON 8.7540% PROPOSED DEBT SERVICE ............................. PRINCIPAL 512,970,000 BOND YEARS 136,541.667 AVG. MATURITY 10.527 AVG. COUPON 6.76424% N.I.C. 6.86398% T.I.C. 6.73993% Prepared by: Public Financial System, Inc. ( 06- Nov -89 ) 992-157032 P.02 Page 1 I o e 4, �. 0 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION ~�RPONf`S�� �BBe To: Mayor and Council Agenda Item # • =.A. From: John Wallin Consent ❑ Finance Director - Information Only ❑ Date: November 6, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Award of Bid- 7 To Council Refunding Bonds Action ❑ Motion El Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Approve resolution relating to $12,970,000 G.O. Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1989; Authorizing issuance, awarding sale, fixing form and detail, providing for execution and delivery thereof and security therefor. Info /Background: At the October 2, 1989 Council meeting the City Council approved the bond refunding proposal and due to the volatility of interest instructed staff to carry through with the sale as soon as interest rates dropped to the point where a refunding would bring about at least $400,000 of present value savings over the life of the bonds. Because of recent declines in interest.rates this present value target can now be achieved. With the rates on November 2, the estimated.- present value savings would be $456,037. Attached is a draft of the resolution and the Official Statement relating to the $12,970,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds. The bids will be opened, read and tabulated on Monday, November 6, 1989 at 11:00 am. The results of the bidding process will be presented to the City'Council for consideration at the Council meeting at 7:00 on the same date. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its.adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO $12,970,000 OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING 1989; AUTHORIZING. THE ISSUANCE, AW, SALE, FIXING THE FORM AND DETAILS, THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY THEREOF SECURITY THEREFOR GENERAL BONDS, SERIES ARDING THE PROVIDING FOR AND THE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), as follows: Section 1. Authorization and Sale. 1.01. Authorization. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178 and Chapter 475 the City has issued its General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985 (the Series 1985 Bonds) in the original principal amount of $12,000,000. The Series 1985 Bonds were issued to provide funds to finance public redevelopment costs paid or incurred by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Edina, Minnesota (the HRA) or the City in connection with a redevelopment project being undertaken by the HRA pursuant to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the Redevelopment Plan) of the HRA. The Series 1985 Bonds are payable from tax increments derived from the tax increment financing district established by the HRA pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan which is designated by Hennepin County as District No. 1201 (Tax Increment Financing District No. 1201): In addition, to finance public redevelopment costs of the Redevelopment Plan, the HRA has established another tax increment financing district covering property in the area subject to the Redevelopment Plan, which is designated by Hennepin County as District No. 1203 (Tax Increment Financing District No. 1203). Tax Increment Financing District No. 1201 and Tax Increment Financing District No. 1203 are hereinafter together referred to as the "Districts." The Series 1985 Bonds are presently outstanding in the amount of $11,850,000. The City presently estimates that it can effect a substantial annual debt service savings by refunding the outstanding bonds described above which are callable for redemption and prepayment by the City in advance of their maturities in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.67; and the City hereby authorizes the issuance and sale of $12,970,000 in aggregate principal amount of general obligation refunding bonds (the Bonds) on the terms set forth in this resolution, the proceeds of which, together with other available moneys of the City, shall be used for this purpose, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.52. 1.02 Sale of Bonds. Notice of the sale of the Bonds was duly published as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60. Pursuant to the Notice of Bond Sale and the Terms and Conditions of Sale, sealed bids for the purchase of the Bonds were received at or before the time specified for receipt of bids. The bids have been opened and publicly read and considered, and the purchase price, interest rates and net interest cost under the terms of each bid have been determined. The most favorable proposal received is that of of , and associates.(the Purchaser), to purchase the Bonds price of$ , plus accrued interest from the the Bonds to the date of delivery thereof, the Bonds t at a date of o bear interest at the rates set forth in Section 3.01. The proposal is hereby accepted, and the Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute a contract on the part of the City for the sale of the Bonds with the Purchaser. The good faith checks of the unsuccessful bidders shall be returned forthwith. 1.03. Performance of Requirements. All acts, conditions and things which are required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the valid issuance of the Bonds having been done, existing, having happened and having been performed, it is now necessary for this Council to establish the form and terms of the Bonds, to provide security therefor and to issue the Bonds forthwith. 1.04. Maturities. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.54, subdivision 17, this Council hereby estimates that the tax increments from the Districts pledged herein to the payment of the Bonds are sufficient to pay when due the principal of and interest on the Bonds. Section 2. Form of Bonds. 2.01. Bond Form. The Bonds shall be prepared in substantially the following form: -2- [Face of the Bonds] UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BOND SERIES 1989 an Rate REGISTERED OWNER PRINCIPAL AMOUNT Date of Maturity Original Issue November 1, 1989 CUSIP SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS DOLLARS THE CITY OF EDINA, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the City), acknowledges itself to be indebted and, for value received, hereby promises to pay to the registered owner named above, or registered assigns,.the principal amount specified above, on the maturity date specified above, with interest thereon -from the date of original issue specified above, or the most recent interest payment date to which interest has been pa "id.or duly provided for, at the annual rate specified above, payable on January 1 and July 1 in each year, commencing July 1, 1990, to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month, all subject to the provisions referred to herein with respect to the redemption of the principal of this Bond before maturity. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof at the principal office of the Bond Registrar hereafter designated, the principal hereof, are payable in lawful money of.the United States of America by check or draft of in , as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the Bond Registrar), or its successor designated under the Resolution described herein. -3- Additional provisions of this Bond are contained on the reverse hereof and such provisions shall for all purposes have the same effect as though fully set forth hereon. This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under the - Resolution until the Certificate of Authentication hereon shall have been executed by the Bond Registrar by manual signature. of one of its authorized representatives. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Edina, Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed by the facsimile signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager and by a printed facsimile of the official seal of the City and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the date set forth below. Dated of Authentication: (Facsimile Signature) (Facsimile Signature) City Manager Mayor (Facsimile Seal) CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This is one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned within. By as Bond Registrar Authorized Representative [Reverse of the Bonds] This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $12,970,000 (the "Bonds "), issued pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on November 6, 1989 (the "Resolution ") - to refund outstanding general obligation tax increment bonds of the.City: The Bond is issued pursuant to and in full conformity with the provisions of the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota thereunto enabling, -4- including Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178 and Chapter 475. In addition, for the full and prompt payment of the principal and interest on the Bonds as the same become due, the full faith, credit and taxing power of the City have been and are irrevocably pledged. The Bonds are issuable only as fully registered bonds, in denominations of $5,000 or any multiple thereof, of single maturities. Bonds maturing in the years 1991 through 1996 are payable on their respective stated maturity dates without option of prior payment, but Bonds having stated maturity dates in the years 1997 through 2006 are each subject to redemption and prepayment, at the option of the City in whole or in part, and if in part, in inverse order of maturities and in $5,000 principal amounts selected by lot, within any maturity, on January 1, 1996 and on any interest payment date thereafter, at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued to the date of redemption. At least thirty days prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond, notice of the call for redemption will be mailed to the Bond Registrar and to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed at his address appearing in the Bond Register, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond, not affected by such defect or failure. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions of Bonds so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price therein specified, and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bonds or portions of Bonds shall cease to bear interest. Upon partial redemption of any Bond, a new Bond or Bonds will be delivered to the registered owner without charge, representing the remaining principal amount outstanding. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Bond Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by his attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Bond Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or his attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange, the City will cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. -5- The City and the Bond Registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond in order to make it a valid and binding general obligation of the City according to its terms have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed in regular and due form as so required; that prior to the issuance hereof, the City has pledged and appropriated tax increments to be derived by the City from tax increment districts in the City to a' sinking fund established for the payment of the Bonds; that, if necessary for the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds, ad valorem taxes are required to be levied upon all taxable property in the City, which levy is not limited as to rate or amount; and that the issuance of this Bond does not cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation. The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to the applicable laws or regulations: TEN-COM -- as tenants UNIF GIFT MIN ACT..... Custodian..... in common (Gust). (Minor) TEN ENT -- as tenants by the entireties under Uniform Gifts to JT TEN -- as joint tenants Minors with right of survivorship and Act ...................... not as tenants in (State) common Additional abbreviations may also be used. ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto the within Bond and all rights thereunder, irrevocably constitutes and appoints and hereby attorney to transfer the within Bond on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: ° PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER NOTICE: The signature to this OF ASSIGNEE: assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration or any change whatsoever. Signature(s) must be guaranteed by a commercial bank or trust company or by a brokerage firm having a membership in one of the major stock exchanges. 2.02. Form of Certificate. A certificate in substantially the following form shall appear on the reverse side of each Bond, following a copy of the text of the legal opinion of Bond Counsel: We certify that the above is a full, true and correct copy of. the legal opinion rendered by Bond Counsel on the issue of Bonds of.the City of Edina which includes the within Bond, dated as of the date of delivery of and payment for the Bonds. (Facsimile signature) City Manager (Facsimile signature) Mayor Section 3. Bond Terms, Execution and Delivery. 3.01. Maturities, Interest Rates, Denominations, Payment, and Dating of Bonds. The City shall forthwith issue and deliver the Bonds, which shall be denominated "General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1989." The Bonds shall be issuable in the denomination of $5,000 each or any integral multiple thereof, shall mature on January 1 in the years and amounts set forth below, and Bonds maturing in such years and amounts shall bear interest from date of issue until paid'or duly called for redemption at the rates per annum shown opposite such years and amounts as follows: -7- Year Amount Rate Year Amount Rate 1991 $ 185,000 % 1999 $1,035,000 % 1992 130,000 2000 1,025,000 1993 160,000 2001 1,115,000 1994 170,000 2002 1,100,000 1995 - 555,000 2003 1,085,000 1996 1,060,000 2004 1,070,000 1997 . 1,055,000 2005 1,100,000 1998 1,045,000 2006 1,180,000 The Bonds shall be issuable only in fully registered form. The interest thereon and, upon surrender of each Bond, the principal amount thereof, shall be payable by check or draft issued by the Registrar described herein. Each Bond shall be dated as of its date of initial authentication. 3.02. Interest Payment Dates. Interest on the Bonds shall be payable on January 1 and July 1 in each year, commencing July 1, 1990, to the owner of record thereof as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the immediately preceding month, whether or not such day is a business day. . 3.03.- Registration. The City shall appoint, and shall maintain, a bond registrar, transfer agent and paying agent (the Registrar). The effect of registration and the rights and duties of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto shall be as follows: (a) Register. The Registrar shall keep at its principal corporate trust office a bond register in which the-Registrar shall provide for the registration of ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged. (b) Transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender to the Registrar for transfer.of any Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner thereof or by an attorney duly authorized by the registered owner in writing, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the transferor. The Registrar may, however, close the books for registration of any transfer after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each interest payment date and until such interest payment date. (c) Exchange of Bonds. Whenever any Bond is surrendered by the registered owner for exchange, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the registered owner or the owner's attorney duly authorized in writing. (d) Cancellation. All Bonds surrendered upon any transfer or exchange shall be promptly cancelled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. (e) Improper or Unauthorized Transfer. When any Bond is presented to the Registrar for transfer, the Registrar may refuse to transfer the same until it is satisfied that the endorsement on such Bond or separate instrument of transfer is legally authorized. The - Registrar shall incur no liability for its refusal, in good faith, to make transfers which it, in its judgment, deems improper or unauthorized. (f) Persons Deemed Owners. The City and the Registrar may treat the person in whose name any Bond is at any time registered in the bond register as the absolute owner of such Bond, whether such Bond shall be overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal of and interest on such Bond and for all other purposes, and all such payments so made to any such registered owner or upon the owner's order shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability of the City upon such Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. (g) Taxes, Fees and Charges. For every transfer or exchange of Bonds (except for an exchange upon a partial redemption of a Bond), the Registrar may impose a charge upon the owner thereof sufficient to reimburse the Registrar for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. (h) Mutilated, Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. In case any Bond shall become mutilated or be lost, stolen or destroyed, the Registrar shall deliver a new Bond of like amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of any such mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in substitution for any such Bond lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in connection therewith; and, in the case of a Bond lost, stolen or destroyed, upon filing with the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that such Bond was lost, stolen or destroyed, and of the ownership thereof, and upon furnishing to the Registrar of an appropriate bond or indemnity in form, substance and amount satisfactory to it, in which both the City and the Registrar shall be named as obligees. All Bonds so surrendered to the Registrar shall be cancelled by it and evidence of such cancellation shall be given to the City. If the mutilated, lost, stolen or destroyed Bond has already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms, it shall not be necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment. (i) Authenticating Agent. The Registrar is hereby designated authenticating agent for the Bonds, within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.55, subdivision 1. 3.04. Appointment of Initial Registrar. The City hereby appoints Minnesota, as the initial Registrar. The Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, a contract with , as Registrar. Upon merger or consolidation of the Registrar with another corporation, if the resulting corporation is a bank or trust company authorized by law to conduct such business., such corporation shall be authorized to act as successor Registrar. The City agrees to pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for the services performed. The City reserves the right to remove any Registrar upon thirty (3,0) days' notice and upon the appointment of a successor Registrar, in which event the predecessor Registrar shall deliver all cash and Bonds in its possession to the successor Registrar and shall deliver the bond register to the successor Registrar. On or before each principal or interest due date, without further order of this Council, the City Finance Director shall transmit to the Registrar from the Bond Fund, moneys sufficient for the payment.of all principal and interest then due. 3.05. Redemption. Bonds maturing in the years 1991 through 1996 shall not be subject to redemption prior to maturity, but Bonds maturing in the years 1997 through 2006 shall each be subject to redemption and prepayment, at the option of the City, in whole or in part, and if in part, in inverse order of maturities and, within any maturity, in $5,000 principal amounts selected by the Registrar by lot, on January 1, 1996 and on any interest payment date thereafter at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued to the date of redemption. At least thirty days prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond, -10- the City Manager shall cause notice of the call for redemption to be mailed to the Registrar and to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond not affected by such defect or failure. The notice of redemption shall specify the redemption date, redemption price, the numbers, interest rates and CUSIP numbers of the Bonds to be redeemed and the place at which the Bonds are to be surrendered for payment, which is the principal office of the Registrar. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions thereof so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price therein specified and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bonds or portions thereof shall cease to bear interest. In addition to the notice prescribed by the preceding paragraph, the City shall also give, or cause to be given, notice of the redemption of any Bond or Bonds or portions thereof at-least 35 days before the redemption date by certified mail or telecopy to the Purchaser and all registered securities depositories then in the business of holding substantial amounts of obligations of the character of the Bonds (such depositories now being The Depository Trust Company, of Garden City, New York; Midwest Securities Trust Company, of Chicago, Illinois; Pacific Securities Depository Trust Company, of San Francisco, California; and Philadelphia Depository Trust Company, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) and one or more national information services that disseminate information regarding municipal bond redemptions; provided that any defect in or any failure to give any notice of redemption prescribed by this paragraph shall not affect the validity of the proceedings for the redemption of any Bond or portion thereof. Bonds in a denomination larger than $5,000 may be redeemed in part in any integral multiple of $5,000. The owner of any Bond redeemed in part shall receive, upon surrender of such Bond to the Registrar, one or more new Bonds in authorized denominations equal in principal amount to be unredeemed portion of the Bond so surrendered. 3.06. Preparation and Delivery. The Bonds shall be prepared under the direction of the City Manager and shall be executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager, and shall be sealed with the official corporate seal of the City; provided that said signatures and the corporate seal may be printed, engraved, or lithographed facsimiles thereof. In case any officer whose signature, or a -11- facsimile of whose signature, shall appear on the Bonds shall cease to be such officer before-the delivery of any Bond, such signature or facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if such officer had remained in office until delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, no Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entit -led to any security or benefit under this resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication on such Bond has been duly executed by the manual signature of an authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same representative. The executed certificate of authenti- cation on each Bond shall be conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this resolution. when the Bonds have been so executed and authenticated, they shall be delivered by the City Manager to the purchaser thereof upon payment of the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the purchaser shall not be obligated to see to the application of the purchase price. Section 4. Security Provisions. 4.01. Escrow Agreement. There has been presented to this Council a copy of an Escrow Agreement relating to the Series 1985 Bonds, between the City and an escrow agent (the Escrow Agreement). The form of the Escrow Agreement is hereby approved and is ordered to be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver the Escrow Agreement on behalf of the City in,substantially the form herein approved with such changes as may be approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, which approval shall 'be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery of the Escrow Agreement by the Mayor and City Manager. As set forth in the Escrow Agreement, $ of the proceeds of the Bonds, together with $ of funds of the City or HRA available therefor shall be deposited with the escrow agent in accordance with the Escrow Agreement. 4.02. Bond Fund. A Bond Fund is hereby created, as a special fund and designated on the books of the City as the 1989 Tax Increment Refunding Bonds Bond Fund (the "Bond Fund "); to.be held and administered by the City Finance Director separate and apart from all other funds of the City. The principal of and interest on the Bonds to be issued at the same time as the Bonds to pay a portion of the costs of the Project shall be payable from the Bond Fund. So long as any of the Bonds or any additional bonds issued pursuant to Section 4.04 hereof and made payable from the Bond Fund, are outstanding and -12- any principal thereof or interest thereon unpaid, the City Finance Director shall maintain the Bond Fund, as a separate and special account to be used for the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds, and on all other general obligation bonds now or hereafter issued by the City and made payable therefrom, to finance costs incurred by the City in accordance with the Plan in aid of the Project and any other redevelopment project to be undertaken in accordance with the Plan. The City hereby irrevocably appropriates to the Bond Fund (a) the accrued interest on the Bonds, (b) the tax increments derived from Tax Increment Financing District No. 1203 received by the City from the Authority to pay the Bonds, (c) tax increment derived from Tax Increment Financing District No. 1201 which are appropriated by the City to the Bond Fund from the Bond Fund established by the City in connection with its General Obligation Bonds, Series 1981 pursuant to Section 4.04 of a resolution adopted by the City Council on October 5, 1981 (the 1981 Bond Resolution), and (d) any other moneys appropriated or pledged by the terms of this Resolution to the Bond Fund. The City expressly reserves the right to use amounts in the Bond Fund (other than the amounts initially deposited therein upon the issuance of the Bonds) to finance or pay directly costs paid or incurred by the City pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan in connection with any redevelopment project to be undertaken in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no portion of tax increments derived from Tax Increment Financing District No. 1203 shall be used to pay principal and interest on that portion of the Bonds which have been issued to refund the portion of the Series 1985 Bonds used to fund interest reduction programs undertaken by the HRA pursuant to Minnesota. Statutes, Section 469.012, subdivisions 7 to 10. 4.03. Full Faith and Credit Pledged. The full faith and credit and taxing power of the City shall be and are hereby irrevocably pledged for the prompt and full payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds. It is estimated that the tax increment from the Districts and other funds herein pledged for the payment of the Bonds will be collected in amounts not less than five percent in excess of the amounts needed to meet when due the principal of and interest on the Bonds as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61. Consequently,.no ad valorem taxes are now levied to pay the Bonds or the interest to come due thereon, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178, subdivision 2. If the money on hand in the Bond Fund should at any time be insufficient to pay principal and interest due on all bonds payable therefrom, such amounts shall be paid from any other fund of the City and such other fund shall be reimbursed therefor when sufficient moneys are available in the Bond -13- Fund. If on October 1 in any year the sum of the balance in the Bond Fund plus the amount of tax increment to be derived from the District is not sufficient to pay when due all principal and interest to become due on all bonds payable therefrom in the following calendar year, or the Bond Fund has incurred a deficiency in the manner provided in this Section 4.03, a direct, irrepealable, ad valorem tax shall be levied on all taxable property within the corporate limits of the City for the purpose of restoring such accumulated or anticipated deficiency in accordance with the provisions of this Resolution. . 4.04. Additional Bonds. The City reserves the right to issue additional bonds payable from the Bond Fund and tax increments to be derived from the Districts as may be required to finance costs of other projects to be undertaken in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan. 4.05. Additional Bonds Under 1981 Bond Resolution. Since the Bonds will be payable in part from tax increment derived Tax Increment Financing District No. 1201, the Bonds constitute "additional bonds" payable from the Bond Fund established by the 1981 Bond Resolution and are authorized to be issued by Section 4.07 of the 1981 Bond Resolution. 4.06. Execution of Manager are hereby authorized of the City such documents as the pledge and appropriation Districts by the Authority to Documents. The Mayor and City to execute and deliver on behalf may be appropriate to evidence of the tax increments from the City to pay the Bonds. Section 5. Defeasance. When any Bond has been discharged as provided in this section, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this resolution to the holders of such Bonds shall cease, and such Bonds shall no longer be deemed to be outstanding under this Resolution. The City may discharge its obligations with respect to any Bond thereto which are due on any date by depositing with the paying agent on or befo.re that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full; or, if any Bond should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged by depositing with the paying agent a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued to the date of such deposit. The City may also discharge its obligations with respect to any prepayable Bond according to its terms, by depositing with the paying agent on or before that date an amount equal to the principal, interest and redemption premium, if any, which are then due, provided that notice of such redemption has been duly given as provided herein. The City may also at any time discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds, subject to the -14- provisions of law now or hereafter authorizing and regulating such action, by depositing irrevocably in escrow, with -a bank qualified by law as an escrow agent for this purpose, cash or securities which are authorized by law to be so deposited, bearing interest payable at such times and at such rates and maturing on such dates as shall be required to pay all principal, interest and redemption premiums to become due thereon to maturity or said redemption date. Section 6. County Auditor Registration, Certification of Proceedings, Investment of Moneys, Arbitrage, Designation of Bonds as Qualified Tax Exempt Obligations and Official Statement. 6.01. County Auditor Registration. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the County Auditor of Hennepin County, together with such other information as the County Auditor shall require, and to obtain from said County Auditor a certificate that the Bonds have been entered on his bond register as required by law. 6.02. Certification of Proceedings. The officers of the City and the County Auditor of Hennepin County are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the purchaser of the Bonds and to Dorsey & Whitney, Bond Counsel, certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City, and such other affidavits, certificates and information as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the Bonds as the same appear from the books and records under their custody and control or as otherwise known to them, and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the City as to the facts recited therein. 6.03. Tax Covenant. The City covenants and agrees with the holders from time to time of the Bonds that it will not take or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents any action which would cause the interest on the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder (the Regulations), and covenants to take any and all actions within its powers to ensure that the interest on the Bonds will not become subject to taxation under the.Code and the Regulations. The City will cause to be filed with the Secretary of Treasury an information reporting statement in the form and at the time prescribed by the Code. -15- 6.04. Arbitrage Certification. The Mayor and City Manager, being the officers of the City charged with the responsibility for issuing the Bonds pursuant to this resolution, are authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the purchaser thereof a certificate in accordance with the provisions of Section 148 of the Code, and Sections 1.103 -13, 1.103 -14 and 1.103 -15 of the Regulations, stating the facts, estimates and circumstances in existence on the date of issue and delivery of the Bonds which make it reasonable to expect that the proceeds of the Bonds will not be used in a manner that would cause the Bonds to be arbitrage bonds within the meaning of the Code and Regulations. 6.05 Compliance With Rebate Requirement. The City will not use the proceeds of the Bonds in such a manner as to cause the Bonds to be "arbitrage bonds" within the meaning of Section 148 of the Code and applicable Regulations; to this end, the City shall: (i) maintain records identifying all "gross proceeds" (as defined in Section 148(f)(6)(B) of the Code) attributable to the Bonds, the yield at which such gross proceeds are invested, any arbitrage profit derived therefrom (earnings in excess of the yield on the Bonds) and any earnings derived from the investment of such arbitrage profit; (ii) make, or cause to be made as of the anniversary date of the issuance of,the Bonds, the annual determinations of the amount, if any, of excess arbitrage required to be paid to the United States by the City (the Rebate Amount); (iii) pay, or cause to be paid, to the United States at least once every five Bond Years the amount, if any, which is required to be paid to the United States, including the last installment which shall be made no later than 60 days after the day on which the Bonds are paid in full; and (iv) retain all records of the annual determination of the foregoing amounts until six (6) years after the Bonds have been fully paid. In order to comply with the foregoing requirements, the City Finance Director shall determine the Rebate Amount within 30 days of each anniversary date of the issuance of the Bonds and upon payment in full of the Bonds and shall deposit such Rebate Amount in a separate account and shall separately account for the earnings from the investment of the Rebate -16- Amount. In the event the foregoing requirements conflict with the requirements of the Regulations promulgated under Section 148(f) of the Code, the rquirements of such Regulations shall be controlling. 6.06. Official Statement. The Official Statement, dated as of October 24, 1989, relating to the Bonds prepared and distributed by Public Financial Systems, Inc., the financial consultant for the City, is hereby approved, and the officers of the City are authorized in connection with the delivery of the Bonds to sign such certificates as may be necessary with respect to the completeness and accuracy of the Official Statement. 6.07. Redemption of Refunded Bonds. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to call for redemption on January 1, 1996, all of the Series 1985 Bonds maturing on or after January 1, 1997. The City Manager shall cause the necessary notices of redemption to be published and mailed in connection with the redemption of the Series 1985 Bonds. Attest: Adopted by the City Council on November 6, 1989. City Clerk -17- Mayor NEW ISSUE Rating Requested: Moody's Investors Service Standard & Poor's Corporation In the opinion of Bond Counsel, interest on the Bonds is not includible in gross income of the recipient for United States or Minnesota income tax purposes, but is subject to federal alternative minimum taxes and environmental surtaxes on corporations and Minnesota franchise taxes on financial institutions and corporations measured by income. The Bonds are not arbitrage bonds and are not private activity bonds. The City will not designate the Bonds as "qualified tax- exempt obligations ". (See "Tax Exemption" herein.) $12,970,000* Cit y of Edina, Minnesota General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1989 Dated: November 1, 1989 Due:, January 1, 1991 -2006 The Bonds will be issued for the purpose of refunding and redeeming certain General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds of 1985, in the outstanding principal amount of $11,850,000 in accordance with the provision of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. Interest on the Bonds will be initially payable on July 1, 1990 and semiannually thereafter on January 1 and July 1. The Bonds will be issued in multiples of $5,000 in registered form and will mature on January 1 in the years and amounts as follows: Year Amount Year Amount Year Amount 1991 $ 185,000 1997 $1,055,000 2002 $1,100,000 1992 130,000 1998 1;045,000 2003 1,085,000 1993 160,000 1999 1,035,000 2004 1,070,000 1994 170,000 2000 1,025,000 2005 1,100,000 1995 555,000 2001 1,115,000 2006 1,080,000 1996 1,060,000 "The City reserves the right to increase or decrease the aggregate amount of principal by an amount not to exceed $350,000 and the maximum amount of change in any single year shall not be more than $90,000. Bonds maturing in the years 1997 through 2006 will be subject to redemption and prepayment, in inverse order of maturity or if in part, to be selected by lot by the registrar, on January 1, 1996 and on any interest payment date thereafter at a price of par plus accrued interest at the option of the City. Bids must be for not less than $12,814,360, plus accrued interest on the total principal amount of the issue and be accompanied by a certified check or cashier's check or bank draft in the amount of $259,400 payable to the Finance Director. Bid Opening: Monday, November 6, 1989 @ 11:00 A.M., C.T. Consideration: Monday, November 6, 1989 @ 7:00 P.M., C.T. The Bonds are offered subject to the legal opinion of Dorsey & Whitney, Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota. A rating application has been made to Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and Standard & Poor's Corporation. The date of this Official Statement is October 24, 1989. Further information may be obtained from: PUBLIC FINANCIAL SYSTEMS 512 NICOLLEi MALL, SUITE 550 • MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 2739 SECOND AVENUE S.E • CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA 52403 TELEPHONE: (612) 333 -9177 FAX: (612) 342.2547 TELEPHONE: (319) 363 -2221 CITY COUNCIL No dealer, broker, salesman or other person (except as noted on the foregoing cover page) has been authorized by the issuer to give any information or make any representations other than those contained in this Official Statement or any supplement which may be issued hereto, and if given or made, such other information or representations must not be relied upon as having been author- ized. This Official Statement does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor shall there be any sale of this issue by any person in any jurisdiction in which it is unlawful for such person to make such offer, solicitation, or sale. Information set forth within this Official Statement has been obtained from sources which are believed to be reliable; however, such information is not guaranteed as to its completeness or accuracy. Bond Counsel has not been asked and has not undertaken to review the accuracy, completeness, or suffi- ciency of this Official Statement or other material relating to this issue, except to the extent stated in their final approving legal opinion. .The information, estimates and expressions of opinion herein are subject to change without notice. Neither the delivery of this Official Statement nor any sale of this issue shall, under any circumstances, create any implication that there has been no material change since the date thereof. This Official Statement has been prepared only in connection with the.initial offering and sale of this issue and may not be reproduced or used in whole or in part for any other purpose. Current Term Name Position Expires Frederick S. Richards Mayor January 1993 Peggy Kelly Council Member January 1993 Bernard G. Rice, Jr. Council Member January 1991 Glenn L. Smith Council Member January 1991 Jane L. Paulus Council Member January 1993 ADMINISTRATION Kenneth E. Rosland City Manager Appointed John Wallin Finance Director Appointed Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk Appointed No dealer, broker, salesman or other person (except as noted on the foregoing cover page) has been authorized by the issuer to give any information or make any representations other than those contained in this Official Statement or any supplement which may be issued hereto, and if given or made, such other information or representations must not be relied upon as having been author- ized. This Official Statement does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor shall there be any sale of this issue by any person in any jurisdiction in which it is unlawful for such person to make such offer, solicitation, or sale. Information set forth within this Official Statement has been obtained from sources which are believed to be reliable; however, such information is not guaranteed as to its completeness or accuracy. Bond Counsel has not been asked and has not undertaken to review the accuracy, completeness, or suffi- ciency of this Official Statement or other material relating to this issue, except to the extent stated in their final approving legal opinion. .The information, estimates and expressions of opinion herein are subject to change without notice. Neither the delivery of this Official Statement nor any sale of this issue shall, under any circumstances, create any implication that there has been no material change since the date thereof. This Official Statement has been prepared only in connection with the.initial offering and sale of this issue and may not be reproduced or used in whole or in part for any other purpose. TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i INTRODUCTION . . . . . , , , 1 AUTHORITY, PURPOSE & SECURITY. . . . . . . . 1 RATING. .............................. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 .LITIGATION CLOSING DOCUMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 TAX EXEMPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 ORGANIZATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 GENERAL FUND . . . . . . . . . 10 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES . . . . . . 10 CASH AND INVESTMENTS ON HAND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 UTILITIES FUND . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 LIQUOR FUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 GOLF COURSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 RECREATION CENTER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 PROPERTY TAX SYSTEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 VALUATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 TREND OF VALUES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 LARGER TAXPAYERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 TAX RATES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 TAX COLLECTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 INDEBTEDNESS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 DEBT LIMITATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 DEBT RATIOS ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 DIRECT DEBT - General Obligation - By Issue. . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 DIRECT DEBT - General Obligation _ By Maturity . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 GENERAL OBLIGATION - Self Supportive . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE DEBT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 INDIRECT DEBT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 FUTURE FINANCING . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . 23 ECONOMIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 POPULATION AND AREA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 EMPLOYMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 LARGER EMPLOYERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 INCOME AND TRADE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 BUILDING PERMITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 MEDICAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 EDUCATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 BANKING . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Appendix A Financial Statements Form of Legal Opinion Worksheet Bid Forms SUMMARY Authority & Purpose: The $12.970,000* General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1989 :are being issued for the purpose of refunding and redeeming certain General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds of 1985, in the outstanding principal amount of $11,850,000 in accordance with the - ,provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. Security: The General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds will be a - general obligation of the City for which its full faith, credit and taxing powers are pledged. Debt service will be paid- by tax increment revenue .result- ing from increases in taxable value of real property in a tax increment financing district in the City. Rating: The City's outstanding general obligation bonds are rated "Aal ". by Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and "AA" by Standard & Poor's Corporation. An application has been made for a rating on these Bonds to Moody's Investors Service, and Standard & Poor's. 1988/1989 Property Values: Indicated Market Value: Assessor's Market Value: Gross Tax Capacity: Summary of Indebtedness: Direct General Obligation Debt Levy /Increment /Assessment Supported (Includes This Issue): Self Supportive: Indirect General Obligation. Debt: Total City Funds as of (October 1, 1989): Population.(April, 1989): Area (Square Miles): $3,604,734,906 $3,078,443,610 $ 101,668,818 $ 56,380,000 $ 8,830,000 $ 21,711,529 $ 18,059,154 44,943 16 This Summary is subject in all respects to more complete information contained in this Official Statement. No person is authorized to detach this Summary or use it without this entire document.- (This page left blank intentionally.) INTRODUCTION AUTHORITY. PURPOSE & SECURITY The Bonds will be issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475 for the purpose of refunding and redeeming certain General Obligation. Tax. Increment Bonds of 1985, in the outstanding principal amount of $11,850,000. Sources - Uses New Bond Issue $1.2,970,000 S.L.G.S. $13,317,900 Discount (155,640) Expenses 32,900 Cash on Hand 540,000 Excess Proceeds. .3,560 $13,354,360 $13,354,360 The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which its full faith, credit and taxing powers are pledged together with tax increments resulting from,increases in taxable value of_real property in a tax increment financing district in the City. RATING A rating application has been made to Moody "s Investors Service, Inc. (99 Church Street, New York, New York, 10007, Telephone: 212- 553 -0300) and Standard & Poor's Corp. (25 Broadway, New York, New York, 10004, Telephone: 212 - 208 - 8000)]. Ratings have not 'been assigned as of the date of this Official Statement, although the' City does expect ratings to be .available prior to the sale date of this issue. The City is currently rated "Aal" by Moody's and "AA" by Standard & Poor's. There is no assurance that such ratings will be obtained for any definitive period of time or that such ratings will not be changed or withdrawn if, in the opinion of the rating agencies, cir- cumstances so warrant. Any such changes or withdrawals may have an adverse effect on the marketability of the Bonds. For a full explanation of the meaning and significance of the rating, contact the rating agency „directly. LITIGATION There is no litigation of any nature now pending or threatened questioning the organization of the City, the offices of its present officials, or the right, power and authority of the City to issue the Bonds or to levy and collect taxes for their payment. CLOSING DOCUMENTS Simultaneously with the delivery of and payment for the Bonds by the Pur- chaser, the City will furnish to the Purchaser the following. closing docu- ments; in a form satisfactory to Bond Counsel: (1) Signature Identification Certificate, (2) Receipt and Delivery Certificate; (3) Arbitrage Certificate (if applicable), (4) No- Litigation Certificate; (5) Legal Opinion; and (6) Certificate as to Official Statement as included in this Official Statement. TAX EXEMPTION In the opinion of Dorsey & Whitney, as Bond Counsel, on the basis of laws in effect on the date of issuance of the Bonds, interest on the Bonds is not includible in gross income for federal income tax purposes or in taxable net - 1 - income of individuals, estates and trusts for Minnesota income tax purposes. Interest on the Bonds is includible in taxable income of corporations and financial institutions for purposes of the Minnesota franchise tax. Certain .provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the "Code "), however, impose continuing requirements that must be met after the issuance of the Bonds in order for interest thereon to be and remain not includible in federal gross income and in Minnesota taxable net income. Noncompliance with such requirements by the Issuer may cause the interest on the Bonds to be includible in federal gross income and in Minnesota taxable net income, retroactive to the date of issuance of the Bonds, irrespective in some cases of the date on which such noncompliance occurs or is ascertained. No provision has been made for redemption of the Bonds, or for an increase in the interest rate on the Bonds, in the event that interest on the Bonds becomes includible in federal gross income or Minnesota taxable net income. Interest on the Bonds is not an item of tax preference includible in alterna- tive minimum taxable income for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax applicable to all taxpayers or the Minnesota alternative minimum tax applicable to individuals, estates and trusts, but is includible in book income or in earnings and profits in determining the alternative minimum taxable income of corporations for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax and the environmental tax imposed by Section 59A of the Code. Interest on the Bonds may be includible in the income of a foreign corporation for purposes of the branch profits tax imposed by Section 884 of the Code and is includible in the net investment income of foreign insurance companies for purposes of Section 842(b) of the Code. In the case of an insurance company subject to the tax imposed by Section 831 of the Code, the amount which otherwise would be taken into account as losses incurred under Section 832(b)(5) of the Code must be reduced by an amount equal to fifteen percent of the interest on the Bonds that is received or accrued during the taxable year. Section 86 of the Code requires recipients of certain social security and railroad retirement benefits to take into account interest on the Bonds in determining the taxability of such benefits. Passive investment income, including interest on the Bonds, may be subject to federal income taxation under Section 1375 of the Code for an S corporation that has Subchapter C earnings and profits at the close of the taxable year if more than twenty -five percent of its gross receipts is passive investment income. Section 265 of the Code denies a deduction for interest on indebtedness incurred or continued to purchase or carry the Bonds. The Bonds will not be designated as "qualified tax - exempt obligations ". The foregoing is not intended to be an exhaustive discussion of collateral tax consequences arising from receipt of interest on the Bonds. Prospective purchasers or Bondholders should consult their tax advisors with respect to collateral tax consequences, including without limitation the calculations of alternative minimum tax, environmental tax or foreign branch profits tax liability or the inclusion of social security or other retirement payments in taxable income. - 2 - TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE $12,970,000* GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1989 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Sealed bids for the purchase of $12,970,000* General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1989 (the Bonds) of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) will be received at the offices of Public Financial Systems, Inc., until 11:00 a.m., on Monday, November 6, 1989, when they will be opened, read and tabulated. The bids will be presented to the City Council for consideration at a meeting to be held at the City Hall at 7:00 p.m. on the same date. This is a statement of the terms and conditions upon which the bids for the Bonds will be received, the sale thereof awarded and the Bonds issued. Purpose The Bonds will be issued for the purpose of financing and redeeming certain General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds of 1985, in the outstanding principal amount of $11,85.0,000 in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 475. Type. Denomination and Maturities The Bonds will bear a date of original issue as of November 1, 1989, will be in fully registered form and in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof, of single maturities, and will mature on January 1 in the following years and amounts: Year Amount Year Amount Year Amount 1991 $ 185,000 1996 $1,060,000 2001 $1,115,000 1992 130,000 1997 1,055,000 2002 1,100,000 1993 160,000 1998 1,045,000 2003 1,085,000 1994 170,000 1999 1,035,000 2004 1,070,000 1995 555,000 2000 1,025,000 2005 1,100,000 2006 1,080,000 *The City reserves the right to increase or decrease the aggregate amount of principal by an amount not to exceed $350,000 and the maximum amount of change in any single year shall not be more than $90,000. If the issue size is changed, the premium and /or discount, if any, and the purchase price will be adjusted proportionately. Redemption The Bonds maturing in 1997 and subsequent years will each be subject to redemption and prepayment, at the option of the City, in whole or in part and if in part in inverse order of maturities and by lot within a maturity, on February 1, 1996 and any interest payment date thereafter, at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. Interest Payment Dates and Rates Interest will be payable on July 1, 1990 and semiannually thereafter on each January 1 and July 1, to the registered owners of the Bonds appearing of record in the bond register as of the close of business on the 15th day - 3 - (whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month. All Bonds of the same maturity must bear interest from date of original issue until paid at a single, uniform rate, not exceeding the rate specified for Bonds of any subsequent maturity. Each rate must be expressed in an integral multiple of 1/8 or 5/100 of 1`io, not exceeding the rate specified for Bonds of any subse- quent maturity. Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent .and Paving Agent The City will designate and contract with a bank, financial institution or trust company to act as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the Registrar). The Bond Registrar will be kept, principal and interest will be paid to the registered owner of each Bond and transfers of ownership will be effected by the Registrar. The City will pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for such services. The City reserves the right to remove the Registrar and appoint a successor. Delivery Within 40 days after the sale, the City will deliver to the Registrar the printed Bonds ready for completion and authentication. The original purchaser of the Bonds must notify the Registrar, at least five business days before delivery of the Bonds, of the persons in whose names the bonds will be initially registered and the authorized denominations of the Bonds to be originally issued. If notification is not received by that date, the Bonds will be registered. in the name of the original purchaser and will be issued in denominations corresponding to the principal maturities of the Bonds. On the day of closing, the City will furnish to the purchaser the opinion of bond counsel hereinafter described, an arbitrage certification and a certificate verifying that no litigation in any manner questioning the validity of the Bonds is then pending.or, to the best knowledge of officers of the City, threatened. Payment for the Bonds must be received by the City at its desig- nated depositary on the date of closing in immediately available funds. Legal Opinion An opinion as to the validity of the Bonds will be furnished by Dorsey & Whitney, of Minneapolis, Minnesota and will be printed on the Bonds. The legal opinion will state that the Bonds are valid and binding general obliga- tions of the City enforceable in accordance with their terms, except to the extent to which enforceability may be limited by state or United States laws relating to bankruptcy, reorganization, moratorium or creditors' rights. Type of Bid and Award Sealed bids must be mailed or delivered to the undersigned and must be received prior to the time established above for the opening of bids. Each bid must be unconditional. A good faith deposit in the amount of $259,400 must be submitted with each bid. The good faith deposit must be in the form of a certified or cashiers check or bank draft for immediately available funds. The good faith deposit will be retained by the City as liquidated damages if the bid is accepted and the bidder fails to comply therewith. The good faith deposit will be returned to the purchaser at the closing for the Bonds. The bid authorizing the lowest net interest cost (total interest from date of Bonds to stated maturities less any cash premium or plus any discount) will be deemed the most favorable. No oral bid and no bid of less than $12,814,360 plus accrued interest on all of the Bonds will be considered and -4- the City reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to waive any informality in any bid. The Purchaser of the Bonds will be required as a condition of the sale to execute and submit to the City as a part of its bid, a Certificate in a form satisfactory to the City as to the initial offering price of the Bonds to the public (not including bond houses and brokers or similar persons or organization acting in the capacity of underwriters or. wholesalers) at which price a substantial amount of the.Bonds (not less than ten percent (,100 of each maturity). will be sold, and certifying that the prices will. not be greater than as shown on the Certificate an that the prices are not unreasonable-low. CUSIP Numbers The City will assume no obligation for the assignment or printing of CUSIP numbers on the Bonds or for the correctness of any numbers printed thereon, but will permit such numbers to be assigned and printed at the expense of the purchaser, if the purchaser waives any delay in delivery occasioned thereby. Information for bidders and bidding forms may be obtained.from the undersigned or from Public Financial Systems, Inc., 512 Nicollet Mall, Suite 550, Min- neapolis, Minnesota, 55402; telephone 612- 333 - 9177, financial consultants to the City. Dated: October 2, 1989. Pursuant to-,the resolution of the City Council dated. October 2, 1989, I.hereby authorize Public Financial Systems and Dorsey & Whitney to proceed with.the sale of bonds as described herein. BY: DATE: - 5 - ORGANIZATION Edina is located in the heart of the Minneapolis -St. Paul metropolitan area. The City is adjacent to the southwest border of Minneapolis. Edina is well served by the regional transportation system. Interstate 494, forming the "loop" highway for the area, passes the City's southern border. State Highway 100 /County Road 62 (Crosstown) /U.S. Highway 169 bisect the City. In addition, Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport is located six miles from the City. Edina is celebrating its centennial this year, having been incorporated on December 17, 1888. The City adopted the Council- Manager form of government on January 1, 1955. The City is governed by a five member City Council (see organization chart on following page). The Council Members serve four year overlapping terms. Mr. Kenneth Rosland has served as the City Manager since 1977. Mr. Rosland has been employed by the City since 1958. He held the office of Director of Parks and Recreation from 1962 to 1977. Mr. Rosland is a graduate of the University of Minnesota and a full member of the International City Management Associa- tion. The City's Finance Director is Mr. John Wallin. He has held this position since 1986. Mr. Wallin is a certified public accountant. v City of Ein .a [-Citizens Boarda $ City Council / Commhelons HRA City Attorney City Manager HRA Admin. 1 1 N Personnel Liquor a.. . I Fire Accountinq Svstem and Budgetary Controls Internal..accounting controls of the City are designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance regarding: (1) the safeguarding of assets against loss from unauthorized use or.disposition; and (2) the reliability of financial records for preparing financial statements and maintaining accountability for assets`: Budgetary control is maintained through the use of purchase orders. Purchase orders which-would result in an overrun of the budgeted allotment are not released until additional appropriations are made available. Financial Reporting'.Entity The City has reviewed its financial reporting entity definition in light of the National Council on Governmental Accounting's Statement'No. 3, Defining the Governmental Reporting Entity as adopted by the Governmental Accounting . , Standards; Board Statement 1. The entities included in the City's rep.ort are those for which the City has oversight responsibility. Oversight respon- sibility includes such duties as appointment of governing body members, budget review, approval of property tax levies, responsibility for funding deficits .and for outstanding debt secured by the City's full faith and credit for revenues. Cash Manaaement The City subscribes to the "pooled cash" concept of investing. Under this approach, all funds.with cash balances participate in an investment pool.. This permits some funds to be overdrawn and others to.show cash balances when,.in fact, the -City has a`cash'balance. This pooled cash concept provides for greater amounts of money at more favorable rates. Independent Audit, State Law requires that every city with a.population in' excess of 2,500 submit to the State Auditor audited financial statements which have been - attested to by a.cert_ified- public accountant, public accountant, or the State Auditor. In compliance with this statute, the 1988 audit of the City was conducted by the certified.publi,c accounting firm of Peat, Marwick, Main &'Co. Fund Accounting The accounts of the City are organized on the basis of funds and account groups, each of which is considered a separate accounting entity. The opera- tions of each fund are accounted for with a separate set of self - balancing accounts that comprise its assets, liabilities, fund equity, revenues and expenditures. Government resources are allocated to and accounted for in individual funds based upon'the purposes for which they are to be spent and the means by which spending activities are controlled. Basis of Accounting Governmental funds are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting, in which revenues are recognized when they become both measurable and available. Expenditures are generally recognized under the modified accrual basis when the related fund liability is incurred. The proprietary fund types are accounted for using the accrual basis of accounting. Their revenues are recognized when earned and their expenses are recognized when incurred. Revenue sources susceptible to accrual include property taxes, intergovernmental revenue and investment earnings. Expenditures are recognized when the corresponding liabilities are incurred, except for principal and interest on general long- term debt, which are recognized when due. Operations The City currently employs 231 full -time employees. Fire, police and public works personnel are represented by recognized bargaining units. Public Works and Police employees have current contracts through December 31, 1989. The Fire Department personnel are currently involved in negotiations for a new contract. All office and engineering personnel are non - unionized at this time. All other eligible employees (including police and fire personnel hired after January 1, 1971) are covered under the state - administered Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA). Retirement for police and fire personnel is handled through two separate City pension plans. City contributions to these plans are given below. 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 Social Security $202,023 $223,561 $272,680 $285,922 $344,352 PERA & Police & Fire $504,537 $508,757 $537,402 $552,089 $604,124 The City Fire Department has 30 full -time personnel on staff in one station in the City. The Department operates 7 vehicles including 4 pumpers, 2 paramedic trucks, and a grass fire rig. The City has a fire insurance rating of #4. The City Police Department provides city residents with 46 licensed Police Officers. The City has eleven patrol cars and 15 unmarked cars in the Police Department. The City of Edina operates an extensive public works system under the manage- ment of the City Public Works Director. The Public Works Department includes water and sanitary utility, storm sewer, engineering, parking system and the parks and recreation system. Water Utility - The Water Department maintains a system of 197.97 miles of water main, and 13,347 user - connections. Water is pumped from seventeen wells. Storage capacity is 6 million gallons. Street and Sanitary Sewer - This department is responsible for maintaining the 185.83 miles of sewers in Edina and the 226 miles of streets in the City. Parks and Recreation - The Parks and Recreation Department, maintains 1,279 park acres of which 700 acres are improved. Facilities include 34 playgrounds, 3 private golf courses and 2 public golf courses. - 9 - GENERAL FUND REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES (Year Ending 12/31) Revenues: 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 Taxes $ 4,803,082 $ 5,763,688 $ 6,437,526 $ 6,890,876 $ 7,433,321 Licenses & Permits 405,685 553,908 695,898 710,282 623,760 Intergovernmental 1,632,855 1,752,677 1,903,714 2,039,753 2,154,799 Charges for Services 379,584 540,458 772,920 652,389 740,708 Fines & Forfeits 375,101 386,333 401,203 515,172 532,257 Interest on Investments 56,617 157,447 89,305 203,412 118,759 Miscellaneous 61,161 72,502 83,606 170,025 109,818 Total Revenues $ 7,714,085 $9,258,224 $10,384,172 $11,181,909 $11,713,422 Expenditures: General Government $ 1,204,887 $1,397,975 $1,383,353 $1,425,939 $ 1,655,826 Public Safety 4,018,072 4,223,247 4,520,851 4,762,906 5,122,392 Public Works 2,597,141 2,274,673 2,444,260 2,209,872 2,441,928 Parks -- 0 - -(1) 1,000,148 1,068,170 1,369,848 1,471,741 Other 199,697 363,634 617,814 391,139 597,234 Capital Outlay -- 0 -- 594,788 837,061 683,391 678,709 Total Expenditures $ 8,019,791 $9,854,466 $10,871,509 $10,843,095 $11,967,830 Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over Expenditures $ (305,712) $ (596,242) $ (487,337) $ 338,814 $ (254,408) Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) $ 323,595 $ 1,861,915 $ 966,730 $ 553,357 $ 2,443,671 Excess of Revenues/ Other Sources over Expenditures /Other Uses $ 17,883 $ 1,265,673 $ 479,393 $ 892,171 $2,189,263 Fund Balance - (12/31) $ 1,412,844 $ 2,678,517 $ 3,157,910 $ 4,050,081 $ 6,239,344 Fund Balance as a of Expenditures 17.62% 27.18% 29.05% 37.35% (1) Listed in a seperate fund for this year Source: 1984 - 1988 Audit Reports. - .10 - 52.13% CASH AND INVESTMENTS ON HAND General Fund CDBG Cable Working Capital Art Center Capital Project Swimmi -ng -.Pool Golf Course Arena Gun Range Edinborough Park Utilities /Storm Sewer Liquor Construction Improvement Bond Redemption Total UTILITIES FUND - Water and Sewer $ 4,326,173 (13,193) 862,834 20,902 16,372 5,882,615 (61,797) 1,994,006 (942,780) 9,068 ('339,441.) 6,358,109 141,379 (2,637,971) 2,442,878 $18,059,154 LIQUOR FUND 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 Operating revenues $3,093,546 $3,248,364 $3,136,808 $4,053,788 $4,276,446 Non Operating revenues 295,908 430,577 341,318 95:656 9,276 $3,389,454 $3,678,941 $3,478;126 $4,149,444 $4,285,722 Operating Expenses* (2,996,541) (3,347,289) (3,567,831) (3,745,869) 4,442,843 Net Income (Loss) $ 392,913 $ 331,652 $ (89,705) $ 403,,575 $ (157,121) Excludes: Depreciation $ 390,000 $ 384,618 $ 379,125 $ 381,600 $ 399,954 LIQUOR FUND - 11 - 1.I 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 Gross profit $ 978,700 $ 987,787 $ 986,980 $ 980,749 $1,100,280 Non - Operating revenue 65,809 61,827,: 55,192 67,676 2,511 $1,044,509 $1,049,614 $1,042,172 $1,048,425 $1,102,791 Operating expenses (688,623) (735,443) (722,2981 (735,006) 749,224 Net Income (Loss) $ 355,886 $ 314,171 $ 319,874 $ 313,419 $ 353,567 - 11 - 1.I GOLF COURSE RECREATION CENTER 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 Operating Revenues $ 693,489 $ 786,430 $ 768,220 $ 956,737 $1,241,809 Non - Operating $ 428,628 2,271 - - - - 58,701 2,231 $ 695,760 $ 786,430 $ 768,220 $1,015,438 $1,244,040 Operating Expenses* (504,488) (588,529) (692,8431 (711,898) (817,991) Net Income (Loss) $ 191,272 $ 197,901 $ 75,377 $ 303,540 $ 426,049 * Excludes: 28,719 $ 67,457 $ 11,154 *Excludes: Depreciation $ 50,312 $ 52,569 $ 75,888 $ 106,516 $ 142,561 Interest & Fiscal Charges 11,293 46,928 56,261 46,216 99,512 97,690 112,842 RECREATION CENTER - 12 - 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 Operating revenues $ 337,463 $ 320,228 $ 358,865 $ 364,327 $ 428,628 Non - Operating revenues 30,623 - - 31,575 44,616 8,060 $ 368,086 $ 320,228 $ 390,440 $ 408,943 $436,688 Operating Expenses* (323,639) (363,478) (361,721) (341,486) (425,534) Net Income (Loss) $ 44,447 $ (43,250) $ 28,719 $ 67,457 $ 11,154 *Excludes: Depreciation $ 45,399 $ 47,555 $ 46,928 $ 46,216 $ 45,607 Interest & Fiscal Charges 2,515 1,366 - - - - 48,340 - 12 - PROPERTY TAX SYSTEM In 1988, the Minnesota State Legislature enacted several changes to the property tax system aimed at providing property tax relief. The most sig- nificant of these changes were: (1) Enactment of new ratios calculating taxable values; (2) Elimination of the Homestead Credit beginning in 1990; (3) Creation of Disparity Reduction Aid and Transition Aid programs. These changes will be discussed in the .following section describing the Minnesota property tax system. Tax Cycle Ad valorem property taxes are levied by local governments in Minnesota and are extended and collected by the various counties within the State. Each taxing jurisdiction is required to certify the annual tax levy to the County Auditor by October 10th of the preceding year. A listing of taxes due is then prepared by the County Auditor and turned over to the County Treasurer on or before the first Monday in January. The County Treasurer is responsible for collecting all property taxes within the County. Real estate tax statements are to be mailed out no later than January 31 and personal property tax statements no later than February 15. One -half of the taxes on real property is due on or before May 15. The remainder is due on or before October 15. One -half of personal property taxes is due on or before February 28 and one -half on or before June 30. The County Treasurer's major distribution of tax collections occur on June 1 and November 1 for school districts and July 5 and November 5 for cities, counties, towns, and other taxing jurisdictions. Non - payment of taxes is penalized at various rates, depending on the type of property and the delin- quency period. Property Values All taxable property in Minnesota is listed annually and reappraised at least once every four years with reference to its value on January 2 of that year. Property is appraised at Estimated Market Value, defined as the usual selling price of the property which would be obtained at private sale and not at a forced or auction sale. The taxable value of property, upon which taxes are levied, extended and col- lected, is a percentage of the Estimated Market Value. In previous years, the term for taxable value was "assessed value." In 1988, the Minnesota State Legislature changed the manner in which the taxable value of property is determined. For taxes payable 1989, the taxable value of property is called Gross Tax Capacity. After 1989, taxable value will be referred to as Net Tax Capacity. The mechanics of the computation are the same as in previous years. Gross /Net Tax Capacity equals Estimated Market Value multiplied by a given percentage for the particular classification of property. The following table compares selected Assessed Value ratios for previous years with the Gross and Net Tax Capacity formulas. - 13 - It should be noted that neither the assessed value /tax capacity nor the market value may accurately represent what a property's.actual market value would be in the market place. By dividing the estimated market value used for tax purposes by the State Equalization Aid Review Committee's (EARC) "Sales Ratio" for any particular year, an Indicated Market Value can be calculated which ap- proximates such an actual value. Sales ratios represent the relationship between the market value used for tax purposes and actual selling prices which were obtained in real estate transactions within a governmental unit in any particular year. Residential Homestead First $68,000 $68,000 to $100,000 Over $100,000 Residential Non - Homestead: Three or fewer units Four or more units Agricultural Homestead House: First $65,000* Over $65,000 Agricultural Homestead Land: < $65,000 and < 320 acres < $65,000 over 320 acres Over $65,000 to 320 acres Over $65,000 over 320 acres Agricultural Non - Homestead: House Land Commercial and Industrial: First $60,000 $60,000 to $100,000 Over $100,000 Tax Rates - - - -- Percent of Estimated Market Value - - - -- Payable 1988 Payable 1989 Payable 1990 Gross Tax Net Tax Assessed Value Capacity Capacity 17% 2.17% 1.00% 27% 2.50% 2.50% 27% 3.30% 3.30% 28% 3.50% 3.50% 34% 4.10% 4.10% 14% 1.75% 0.805% 18% 2.20% 2.20% 14% 1.75% 1.12% 14% 1.75% 1.295% 18% 2.25% 1.44% 18% 2.25% 1.665% 180 2.70% 2.700 18% 2.25% 1.665% 28% 3.30% 3.30% 43 %. 3.30% 3.30% 43% 5.25% 5.25% The applicable tax rates are calculated by dividing each taxing district's levy by its corresponding gross tax capacity (taxable value). Prior to 1989, the tax rates were expressed as mill rates, one mill representing one dollar of tax per $1,000 of assessed value. Beginning in 1989, the tax rates will be called tax capacity extension rates and will be expressed in the form of a percentage. Levy Limitations The ability of local governments in Minnesota to levy property taxes is controlled by various statutory limitations. The levy limits described in this section applies to all counties and cities with a population in excess of 2,500. The property tax levy limitation for 1989 is determined by multiplying the "levy limit base" by 104% and by the percentage growth in population or number of households (whichever is greater) and subtracting the amount of Local Government Aid (LGA) to be received in 1989. For the years 1989 and there- - 14 - after, the levy limit base will be adjusted by 103 %. The levy limit base is the actual levy for the previous year (subject to levy limits) plus.LGA and minus special levies (for the.Twin Cities metropolitan area the levy base includes fiscal disparity distribution levies). Property taxes may be levied without limitation for debt service, correcting auditor's.errors and omissions, unfunded pension liability, compensation to the State for the cost of State ordered reassessments and tax increment ,shortfalls due to changes in the property tax system. The levy limit may be appealed to the Commissioner of Revenue. To grant an appeal, the Commissioner must be provided with satisfactory evidence that the levy for the previous year had been reduced because reserve funds were used,to make expenditures. Further information on levy limitations can be obtained from the Minnesota Department of Revenue, Local Government Aids and Analysis Division. Homestead Credit Minnesota homeowners receive direct property tax relief from the Homestead Credit. The State reduces by 54% the property taxes 'on residential homestead property up to a maximum estimated market value of $68,000. The maximum Homestead Credit is $725. Reimbursement for the Homestead Credit.is made to each governmental unit. With the exception of school.- districts, the reimbur- sement payments are made in two equal installments,'on or before July 15th and December 15th. School districts are reimbursed in nine installments from August to May with.a tenth installment made the following October. The current property tax law will end the homestead credit program after 1989. Disparity Reduction Aid Disparity Reduction Aid was created by the 1988 State Legislature and will take effect in 1989. The objective of Disparity Reduction Aid is to reduce property taxes in high tax.,areas to.an approximate equivalent of 125 mills. The amount of Aid is the greater of (1) Payable 1988.Gross Tax.Less Payable 1988 Gross Tax Capacity, or (2) City /Town 1988 Gross Tax Less' 23% of City /Town Payable 1988 Gross Tax Capacity multiplied by 20 %. The determination of Disparity Reduction Aid will be made using 1988 data and will not.be redeter- mined in future years... The County Auditor will use the amount of Disparity Reduction Aid to reduce the property tax rates to each jurisdiction. Units of government levying taxes are reimbursed in accordance with the reduction in tax rates. The payment -of Disparity Reduction Aid follows the same timing as the Homestead Credit. Transition Aid In conjunction with the elimination of the homestead and agricultural credits and the conversion to net tax capacity,. Transition Aid will be paid to.local government in 1990 and in subsequent years. The amount of Transition Aid is calculated according to the following formula: Payable 1989 Gross Tax Less (Payable 1989 Homestead Effective Rate X Net Tax Capacity X 103). The determination of Transition Aid will be made using 1989 data and will not be redetermined in future years. The payment of Transition Aid follows the same timing as the Homestead Credit. - 15 - VALUATIONS TREND OF VALUES Prior Years: 1987/88 $3,190,473,220 88.5% $2,823,568,800 $705,560,060(4) 1986/87 ---- - - - - -- -1988 Levy /1989 Collection----- - - - - -- 2,625,958,950 Indicated Sales Assessor's Tax 2,532,958,450 Market Value(1) Ratio Market Value Capacity Real Property 643,378,605(4) $3,060,814,910 $100,743,307 Personal Property 613,145,399(4) (1) The indicated market value is calculated by dividing the assessor's $3,604,734,906 85.4% 17,628,700 925,511 estate sales ratio. $3,078,443,610 $101,668,818 Less: Incremental Value(2) (3,968,472) Fiscal disparity contribution(3) (9,224,484) Plus: Fiscal disparity distribution 2,499,219 $ 90,975,081 Prior Years: 1987/88 $3,190,473,220 88.5% $2,823,568,800 $705,560,060(4) 1986/87 2,895,213,836 90.7 2,625,958,950 673,924,956(4) 1985/86 2,798,849,116 90.5 2,532,958,450 659,467,919(4) 1984/85 2,777,562,157 87.6 2,433,144,450 643,378,605(4) 1983/84 2,689,907,775 86.3 2,321,390,410 613,145,399(4) (1) The indicated market value is calculated by dividing the assessor's market value by the Minnesota Department of Revenue's real estate sales ratio. (2) The incremental assessed value of urban renewal project areas, in the years after their redevelopment, is segregated from the assessed value upon which tax rates are computed and levied. The same rates, however, are levied upon the incremental value to pay for urban renewal costs (in- cluding debt service). After payment of these costs in full, the incre- mental value is added to the tax base for general governmental purposes. (3) Each community in the seven - county metropolitan area contributes 40% of its new industrial and commercial valuation to an area pool, which is then distributed among the municipalities on the basis of population, special needs, etc. Each governmental unit makes a contribution and receives a distribution -- sometimes gaining and sometimes losing assessed value for tax purposes. Taxes are spread on the basis of assessed valuation after fiscal disparities and adjustments. (4) These figures represent assessed value. The figures for 1989 represent Tax Capacity. Detail of the City's 1988/89 Tax Capacity for Real Property is given below. MULTIPLE DWELLING 6.' COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL 34.3% RESIDENTIAL 58.6% - 16 - OTHER 1% LARGER TAXPAYERS * This represents 13.87% of the total gross tax capacity of the City of Edina. TAX RATES* - Taxes per $1,000 of Assessed Value - 1984/85 - 1987/88* Percent of Gross Tax Capacity Value - 1988/89* Tax ------ - - - - -- Levy /Collection Year- - - - - -- -- Extension 1984/85 1985/86 1986 87' 1987/88 1988/89 Hennepin County $29.26 1988/89 Name Business Tax Capacity Southdale Shopping Center $ 5,669,895 Southdale Office Center Office Building 1,4682372 Pentagon Office Park Office Building 1,417,500 Gaberts and Galleria Shopping Center 1,024,233 Southdale Medical - Center Office Building .963,,112 National Car Office Building 901,267 Cedars of Edina Apartments 899,335 Honeywell Building Office Building 695,221 7500.York Co -op Housing 56811398 Durham Apartments 498.750 $92.48 $14,1062083* * This represents 13.87% of the total gross tax capacity of the City of Edina. TAX RATES* - Taxes per $1,000 of Assessed Value - 1984/85 - 1987/88* Percent of Gross Tax Capacity Value - 1988/89* Tax ------ - - - - -- Levy /Collection Year- - - - - -- -- Extension 1984/85 1985/86 1986 87' 1987/88 1988/89 Hennepin County $29.26 $29.69 $29.36 $31.67 27.10% City of Edina 10.34 11.30 11.95 12.15 9.89 ISD #273 46.21 45.03 43.07 44.84 43.48 ISD #287(Hennepin 112.06 94.98 105.16 110.82 92.53 Technical College) 1.49 1.54 1.42 1.49 1.22 Other 5.18 5.88 5.96 6.74 5.80 $92.48 $93.44 $91.76 $96.89 87.49% *Before computation of homestead credits which are currently 54% of taxes or a $725 maximum. Residents of Edina living in school districts other than #273 would have total mill rates or total tax capacity rates as shown below: 1984/85 1985/86 #270(Hopkins) $88.84 $ 95.56 #271(Bloomington) 97.05 97.92 #280(Richfield) 98.36 102.35 #272(Eden Prairie) 97.38 105:99 #283(St. Louis Park) 96.13 104.97 - 17 - Tax Extension 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 $ 92.80 $100.99 85.73% 94.84 110.86 92.44 98.11 108.16 89.32 104.08 112.06 94.98 105.16 110.82 92.53 TAX COLLECTIONS Source: County Auditor's Reports. - 18 - Collections as First Year Collections of May, 1989(2) Amount Year of Net Levy(1) Amount % Amount 1988/89 $8,996,527(3) -------- - - - -In Process of Collection------ - - - - -- 1987/88 7,433,784 $7,328,114 98.58% $7,375,376 99.21% 1986/87 6,905,063 6,792,720 98.37 6,875,887 99.58 1985/86 6,389,119 6,317,603 98.88 6,377,755 99.82 1984/85 5,698,313 5,616,898 98.57 5,696,552 99.97 (1) Amount of Levy is less Homestead Property Tax Credit and Levy adjustments. (2) Amounts exclude penalties and interest on delinquent payments. (3) This figure represents original gross tax levy. Net tax levy was not available. Source: County Auditor's Reports. - 18 - INDEBTEDNESS DEBT LIMITATION All Minnesota municipalities (counties, cities, towns and school districts) are subject to statutory "net debt" limitations under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.53. Net debt is defined as the amount remaining after deducting from gross debt the following: 1) Obligations payable wholly or partially from special assessments levied upon benefited property. 2) Warrants or orders having no definite maturity. 3)- Obligations payable wholly from revenue producing conveniences. 4) Obligations issued to create or maintain a permanent improvement revolving fund. 5) Obligations issued for public conveniences from which revenue is or may be derived. 6) Obligations specifically excluded under the provisions of law authorizing their issuance. 7) Debt service funds for the payment of principal and interest on obliga- tions other than those described above. With some exceptions, no Minnesota city may incur net debt in excess of two percent (2 %) of its most recent assessed valuation. Amount Legal-Debt Limit (2% x $3,078,443,610) $61,568,872 100% Attributable Debt - 0 0 Unused Debt Margin $61,568,872 100% DEBT RATIOS (1) Based on an estimated population of 44,943. - 19 - of Assessor's % of Tax Total Per Capita(1) Market Value Capacity General Obligation $56,810,000 $1,264-.00 1.85% 62.45% Self-Supporting 8,830,000 196.47 .29 9.71 Indirect Debt 22,194,287 494.00 .72 24.40 (1) Based on an estimated population of 44,943. - 19 - DIRECT DEBT - General Obligation - October 1, 1989 - By Issue Levy /Increment /Assessment Supported Self- SuoDortina(1 Original Maturities Principal Maturities Principal Issue Amount Dated Rates Outstanding Outstanding Redevelopment $ 2,200,000 12/1/75 6.10 - 6.400 12/88 -93 $ 1,100,000 Tax Increment 4,500,000 10/1/81 10.40 - 11.0 10/90 -93 1,800,000 Tax Increment 12,000,000 9/1/85 Refunded With This Issue - - Tax Increment 4,000,000 8/1/86 5.40 - 7.00 8/90 -06 3,950,000 Tax Increment 2,000,000 8/1/86 5.40 - 7.00 8/90 -03 1,950,000 Tax Increment 10,175,000 10/1/88 6.40 - 7.30 2/95 -09 10,175,000 Taxable Tax Increment 5,100,000 10/1/88 9.20 - 9.75 2/95 -09 5,100,000 Taxable Tax Increment 5,300,000 4/1/89 10.00 -10.25 2/95 -09 5,300,000 Tax Increment 8,425,000 4/1/89 6.80 - 7.30 2/95 -09 8,425,000 Improvement 5,400,000 9/1/84 7.90 - 8.75 1/90 -94 2,100,000 Improvement 2,500,000 8/1/86 5.40 - 6.60 8/90 -96 1,750,000 Improvement 1,760,000 4/1/89 6.75 - 7.10 2/92 -01 1,760,000 Tax Increment 12,970,000 11/1/89 This Issue 1/91 -06 12,970,000 $56,380,000 Self- SuoDortina(1 - 20 - Original Maturities Principal Amount Dated Rates Outstanding Outstanding Golf Revenues $1,200,000 9/1/85 6.75 - 8.70% 1/90 -00 $1,100,000 G.O. Utility Revenue 3,160,000 10/1/88 5.90 - 6.80 2/90 -99 3,160,000 Recreational Facility 2,470,000 10/1/88 6.10 - 7.30 12/92 -09 2,470,000 Recreational Facility 2,100,000 4/1/89 6.75 - 7.30 1/92 -09 2,100,000 $8,830,000 - 20 - BY MATURITY GENERAL OBLIGATION - LEVY /ASSESSMENT /TAX INCREMENT SUPPORTED N f� TOTAL PRINCIPAL 1985 1989 TOTAL OUTSTANDING G.O. TAX INCREMENT G.0 TAX INCREMENT PRINCIPAL WITHOUT THIS ISSUE REFUNDED BONDS REFUNDING BONDS (LESS:REFUNDED BONDS % YEAR (10/1/89) (THIS ISSUE) PLUS: THIS ISSUE) REPAID ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- 1989 200,000 200,000 1990 2,050,000 150,000 1,900,000 1991 1,500,000 150,000 185,000 1,535,000 1992 1,780,000 150,000 130,000 1,760,000 1993 1,830,000 200,000 160,000 1,790,000 1994 1,130,000 200,000 170,000 1,100,000 1995 1,500,000 400,000 555,000 1,655,000 1996 1,750,000 900,000 1,060,000 1,910,000 1997 1,650,000 900,000 1,055,000 1,805,000 1998 1,800,000 900,000 1,045,000 1,945,000 1999 2,250,000 900,000 1,035,000 2,385,000 2000 2,200,000 900,000 1,025,000 2,325,000 2001 2,520,000 1,000,000 1,115,000 2,635,000 2002 2,550,000 1,000,000 1,100,000 2,650,000 2003 2,825,000 1,000,000 1,085,000 2,910,000 2004 3,175,000 1,000,000 1,070,000 3,245,000 2005 3,400,000 1,050,000 1,100,000 3,450,000 2006 3,650,000 1,050,000 1,080,000 3,680,000 2007 2,800,000 2008 3,425,000 2009 3,675,000 2010 1,100,000 2011 1,800,000 2012 2,250,000 2013 2,450,000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 55,260,000 11,850,000 12,970,000 56,380,000 5YR 13% IOYR 2BY. 15YR 510 TOTAL P & I OUTSTANDING WITH THIS ISSUE ---------- - - - - -- 234,600 5,992,160 5,780,505 5,888,422 5,831,260 4,994,357 5,996,180 6,390,910 6,217,323 6,337,262 6,385,497 6,486,678 6,662,310 6,427,128 6,425,682 6,503,706 6,453,938 6,408,941 4,746,981 5,346,293 5,363,012 --------------- - 120,873,145 GENERAL OBLIGATION - Self Supportive By Maturity Principal Outstanding 1990 $ 220,000 1991 300,000 1992 415,000 1993 495,000 1994 495,000 1995 520,000 1996 555,000 1997 585,000 1998 665,000 1999 700,000 2000 280,000 2001 290,000 2002 320,000 2003 330,000 2004 365,000 2005 395,000 2006 430,000 2007 445,000 2008 505,000 2009 520.000 $8,830,000 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE DEBT 5 yr - 22% 10 yr - 56% 15 yr -74% Principal and Interest Outstandinq $ 867,941 894,585 987,141 1,037,735 1,004,980 995,873 994,285 985,030 1,021,101 1,007,180 550,841 539,545 547,998 534,878 544,979 547,604 552,760 535,999 561,393 538.980 $15,250,828 Industrial Development Revenue Bonds (IDRB) are issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474 for the purpose of financing costs of acquiring, constructing, reconstructing or extending various projects as contracted between the City and authorized persons or public or private corporations. The Bonds are special obligations of the City payable solely from project revenues pledged. The Bonds do not constitute an obligation upon any property of the City, except the project itself, nor do the Bonds constitute a debt of the City. Issued Original Issue 5/1/82 Fairview Southdale Hospital Revenue Bonds 4,500,000 8/1/85 Fairview Southdale Hospital Revenue Bonds 10,055,000 12/1/86 Multifamily Mortgage Revenue Bonds(Biltmore)12,600,000 10/1/85 Housing Redevelopment Revenue Bonds - Edina Park Plaza Project Series 1985 17,622,800 - 22 - Outstanding 3,800,000 7,715,000 12,600,000 17,619,893 INDIRECT DEBT - October 31, 1989 Special Districts Metro Council $2,325,812,286 $90,975,081 3.91 $358,084,000 $14,001,084 Metro Transit 2,137,697,518 90,975,081 4.25 10,950,000 465,375 Subtotal City Share $ 14,466,459 Total City Share $21,711,529 FUTURE FINANCING - 90 days None of the overlapping entities anticipate the issuance of debt within the next 90 days. - 23 - Taxable Gross Tax Capacity Net G.O. Debt 1988/89 Taxable in the City G.O. Debt Applicable Gross Tax Capacity Amount % Outstanding to City Hennepin Co. $1,217,545,243 $ 90,975,081 7.47 $60,375,000 $4,511,224 ISD #273(Edina) 75,225,887 73,556,502 97.78 658,020 643,411 ISD #287 (Hennepin Technical Center) 784,797,312 90,975,081 11.59 3,586,877 415,719 ISD #270(Hopkins) 95,561,842 6,480,296 6.78 6,300,000 427,140 ISD #271(Bloomington) 123,747,638 10,766 .01 6,550,000 569 ISD #272(Eden Prairie) 55,128,539 1,310,694 2.37 46,995,000 1,113,781 ISD #280(Richfield) 41,849,367 9,611,608 22.97 580,000 133,226 ISD #283(St.Louis Park) 50,387,544 5,215 .01 -- -- Subtotal City Share $7,245,070 Special Districts Metro Council $2,325,812,286 $90,975,081 3.91 $358,084,000 $14,001,084 Metro Transit 2,137,697,518 90,975,081 4.25 10,950,000 465,375 Subtotal City Share $ 14,466,459 Total City Share $21,711,529 FUTURE FINANCING - 90 days None of the overlapping entities anticipate the issuance of debt within the next 90 days. - 23 - ECONOMIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC POPULATION AND AREA Total land area of the City is 16 square miles. Population figures for the City are given below. 1989 1960 1970 1980 (April) City of Edina 28,501 44,046 46,073 44,943 Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census and State Demographer. EMPLOYMENT Labor force and unemployment statistics for the City of Edina and the State of Minnesota are given below: ----------- - - - - -- Average Annual----------- - - - - -- 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 Labor Force: Edina 25,608 25,732 25,882 26,517 27,128 Unemployment Rate: Edina 3.1% 2.7% 2.6% 3.0% 2.3% State 6.3 6.0 5.3 5.4 4.0 Estimated nonagricultural covered(1) wage and salary employment for Hennepin County is given below: September 1988 Agriculture, Mining, Forestry, Fishing 3,095 Manufacturing 126,638 Construction 27,993 Transportation, Communication & Utilities 43,260 Trade 185,673 Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 61,977 Services(2) .195,339 Government(3) 74,736 Total 718,711 (1) Covered employment includes only those subject to unemployment insurance coverage. (2) Includes private schools and colleges. (3) Includes city, county, state and federal offices and public schools and colleges. Source: Minnesota Department of Jobs and Training. - 24 - LARGER EMPLOYERS A listing:of the larger employers located the area is given below: Employer Fairview Southdale Hospital National Car Rental Daytons J.C. Penney Target Stores B. Dalton Carson Pirie Scott Sico, Inc. ATT Wausau Insurance Product /Service Hospital Vehicle rental /leasing Department Store Retai-ler Retailer Bookstore headquarters Department Store Space saving equipment Communications Insurance * Does not include physicians on staff. INCOME AND TRADE Total EBI (000)(1): Hennepin County City of Edina State of Minnesota Median Household EBI: Hennepin County City of Edina State Percent of Households W.ith.EBIs in Excess of $20,000: He County City of Edina State # of Employees 2;100* 1,700 1,100 400 390 350 325 250 236 175 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 $13,620,967 $14,675,648 $15.,950,609 $17,760,732 $16,270,3 976;374 1,051,856 1,141,940 1,249,915 1;137,5 46,673,987 50,146,883 52,996,789 58,403,780 53,820,0 $ 32,060 $ 29,204 $ 30,127 $ 33,132 $ 30,0 45,795 42,316 43,721 47,797 43,7 27,037 24,812. 25,470 27,803 25,3 71.4% 84.3 64.3 Retail Sales Total Retail Sales ($000) Hennepin County $ 7,612,528 City of Edina 733,870 State of Minnesota 25,127,747 Retail Sales Per Household: 66.3% 67.2% 79.5 80.1 59.8 60.6 $ 81255,326 $ 8,689,408 795,752 836,618 27,241,195 28,044,113 70.6% 82A 64.2 $9,184,604 869,291 28,903,224 67 80 60 $9,739,2 915,7 31,320,2 Hennepin County $ 19,975 $ 21,205 $ 21,292 $ 22,346 $ City of Edina 39,244 41,662 :41.9-830 43,903 State 16,415 17,579 17,683 18,153 (1) Effective Buying Income (EBI). Source: Sales and Marketing Management, "Survey of Buying Power." - 25 - 23,3 45,7 19,3, BUILDING PERMITS - City of Edina * As of October 1, 1989. Source: City Building Permit Records. MEDICAL Medical facilities and services are available to area residents at Fairview Southdale Hospital located in Edina. The Hospital has a 390 bed capacity and employs 1,900 full and part -time employees and has a medical staff of 800 doctors. Area residents also have access to many other hospitals and nursing homes located in Minneapolis /St. Paul and the surrounding suburbs. EDUCATION Independent School District No. 273 serves the City of Edina and encompasses 11.6 square miles. The District operates 4 elementary schools, 3 junior - senior high schools, and the Edina Community Center. The insured value of all buildings and contents is $84,307,871. The K -12 personnel of the District consist of the following categories measured in full -time equivalencies: teachers - 319, administrators - 29, clerical - 66, others - 151, and part -time employees with a total of 147. The teachers and principals contracts expired 6- 30 -89. A new one is presently being negotiated. Custodial, secretarial and food service employees are contracted through 6- 30 -90. Current and prior year enrollment figures are given below: K - 390 7 New 1987/88 - 5,501 1 - 410 8 - 406 1986/87 - 5,687 Residential Commercial - 421 1985/86 - 5,750 3 - 393 Year Single /Multi Family Industrial/ 4 - 409 Other - 464 Total 5,926 No. Value No. Value No. Value No. Value 1989* 32 $19,325,488 14 $39,980,330 746 $24,603,538 792 $83,909,356 1988 49 16,657,937 3 3,165,000 795 28,116,704 847 47,939,641 1987 66 30,349,482 3 4,967,000 891 22,378,014 960 57,694,496 1986 98 39,611,300 5 18,034,760 792 14,939,332 895 72,585,392 1985 72 36,058,313 5 6,645,080 731 21,591,182 808 64,294,575 1984 54 14,979,650 3 1,290,500 834 15,019,287 891 31,289,437 1983 77 19,920,342 4 9,250,500 793 14,258,871 874 43,429,713 * As of October 1, 1989. Source: City Building Permit Records. MEDICAL Medical facilities and services are available to area residents at Fairview Southdale Hospital located in Edina. The Hospital has a 390 bed capacity and employs 1,900 full and part -time employees and has a medical staff of 800 doctors. Area residents also have access to many other hospitals and nursing homes located in Minneapolis /St. Paul and the surrounding suburbs. EDUCATION Independent School District No. 273 serves the City of Edina and encompasses 11.6 square miles. The District operates 4 elementary schools, 3 junior - senior high schools, and the Edina Community Center. The insured value of all buildings and contents is $84,307,871. The K -12 personnel of the District consist of the following categories measured in full -time equivalencies: teachers - 319, administrators - 29, clerical - 66, others - 151, and part -time employees with a total of 147. The teachers and principals contracts expired 6- 30 -89. A new one is presently being negotiated. Custodial, secretarial and food service employees are contracted through 6- 30 -90. Current and prior year enrollment figures are given below: K - 390 7 - 324 1987/88 - 5,501 1 - 410 8 - 406 1986/87 - 5,687 2 - 404 9 - 421 1985/86 - 5,750 3 - 393 10 - 409 1984/85 - 5,832 4 - 409 11 - 464 1983/84 - 5,926 5 - 372 12 - 548 6 - 410 Special - 12 Total - 5,372 Portions of the City are also served by the following school districts: #270 (Hopkins), #271 (Bloomington), #280 (Richfield), #272 (Eden Prairie), and #283 (St. Louis Park). - 26 - BANKING Banking and financial services are available to area residents at many full service banks and at a number of savings & loan and credit union institutions. The top three banks in Minnesota have branch banks located in Edina. A breakdown of deposits for the branch banks is not available. Year end deposits are listed below for Fidelity Bank of Edina and Americana Bank of Edina. 1988 year end total deposits for the top three Minnesota banks having branch banks located in Edina are given below: Fidelity Bank N.A. $10,674,000,000 Norwest Bank Minnesota N.A. 5,540,745,000 Marquette Bank Minneapolis, N.A. 1,106,095,000 Source: Commercial West "Bank Directory of the Upper Midwest" and the individual banks. - 27 - Deposits Institution as of 12 -31 -88 Fidelity Bank $ 65,115,000 Americana Bank Edina 42,000,000 $107,115,000 Prior Years: 12 -31 -87 $94,030,000 12 -31 -86 92,816,141 12 -31 -85 82,098,871 12 -31 -84 78,015,485 12 -31 -83 65,731,284 1988 year end total deposits for the top three Minnesota banks having branch banks located in Edina are given below: Fidelity Bank N.A. $10,674,000,000 Norwest Bank Minnesota N.A. 5,540,745,000 Marquette Bank Minneapolis, N.A. 1,106,095,000 Source: Commercial West "Bank Directory of the Upper Midwest" and the individual banks. - 27 - Appendix A City of Edina, Minnesota Audited Financial Statements for year ended December 31, 1988 The City of Edina.is audited annually by the certified public accounting firm of Peat, Marwick, Main & Co. The following pages are selected schedules extracted from the annual Financial Report of-the City for.1988. Governmental Funds are accounted for using the modified accrual'basis of accounting. Proprietary funds;are' accounted for using the-accrual basis of accounting'.. The complete audited financial statement may_,contain additional.,,information to aid'in the interpretation and explanation of the schedules included ini "this statement. Notes.to the audit—are available upon request by calling Public Financial Systems, Inc. KPMG Peat Marwick Cerofied Public Accountants Past Marwick Main A Co. 4200 Norwest Center 90 South Seventh Street Minneapolis. MN 55402 Independent Auditors' Report Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Edina, Minnesota: We have audited the combined financial statements of the City of Edina, Minnesota as of and for the year ended December 31, 1988, as listed in the accompanying table of contents. These combined financial statements are the responsibility of the City's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these combined financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing stan- dards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the combined financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evi- dence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the combined financial state- ments. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the combined financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the City of Edina, Minnesota, at December 31, 1988, and the results of its operations and the changes in financial position of its proprietary fund types for the year then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. As discussed in note 9 to the financial statements, the City reclassified revenues and expenditures previously reported in the general fund into special revenue funds, and also changed the accounting for construction fund expenditures relating to enterprise activities into enterprise funds. Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the combined financial statements taken as a whole. The combining, individual fund, and account group financial statements and schedules listed in the accompanying table of contents are presented for purposes of additional analysis. They are not a required part of the combined financial statements of the City of Edina, Minnesota. Such information has been subjected to the auditing proce- dures applied in the audit of the combined financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in ail material respects in relation to the com- bined financial statements taken as a whole. The data designated as the "statistical section" in the accompanying table of contents is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a re- quired part of the basic financial statements. Such information has not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic finan- cial statements and, accordingly, we express no opinion on it. May 12, 1989 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Combined Statement of Revenues. Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual - General and Special ReArenue Fund Types Year ended December 31, 1988 (with comparative totals for year ended December 31, 1987) Totals (memorandum only) General Variance - Spacial Revenue Variance - 1988 variance - 1987 Budget Actual favorable (nnfavnrablel Budget favorable Actual (unfavorable) Budget Actual favorable (unfavorable) Actual Revenuesi Taxes i 7,546,747 7,433,321 (113,426) - - - 7,546,747 7,433,321 (113,426) 6,890,876 Franchise fee - - - - 48,528 48,528 - 48,528 48,528 58,683 Licenses and permits 609,700 623,760 14,060 - - - 609,700 623,760 14,060 710,282 Intergovernmental 1,919,193 2,154,799 235,606 - 54,071 54,071 1,919,193 2,208,870 289,677 2,043,581 Charges for services 811,166 740,708 (70,458) - - - 811,166 740,708 (70,458) 652,389 Fines and forfeitures 500,000 532,257 32,257 - - - 500,000 532,257 32,257 515,172 Interest on investments 65,000 118,759 53,759 - - - 65,000 118,759 53,759 209,807 Sales and rental of property 15,000 27,846 12,846 - - - 15,000 27,846 12,846 52,495 Miscellaneous 102.500 61.972 (20,528) - - _ 102.500 81,972 (20.528) 117.530 Total revenues 11.569.306 11,713.422 144.116 - 102.599 102,599 - 11.569,306 11.816.021 246,715 11,250,815 Expenditures: Currents General government 1,663,725 1,655,826 7,899 - - - 1,663,725 1,655,826 7,899 1,425,939 Public safety Public works 5,092,720 5,122,392 (29,672) - - - 5,092,720 5,122,392 (29,672) 4,762,906 Parks 2,450,738 2,471,373 (20,635) - - - 2,450,738 2,471,373 (20,635) 2,209,872 Unallocated general 1,497,897 335,240 1,471,741 26,156 - - - 1,497,897 1,471,741 26,156 1,369,648 Other 321,166 14,074 - - - 335,240 321,166 14,074 340,300 Capital outlay) 89,400 276,068 (186,668) - 145,458 145,458 89,400 421,526 (332,126) 163,837 General government Public safety 18,398 253,615 151088 3,310 - - - 18,398 15,088 3,310 26,737 Public works 246,899 6,716 - - - 253,615 246,899 6,716 322,132 Parks 288,318 91.255 293,155 123,567 (4,837) - - - 288,318 293,155 (4,837) 271,756 Total expenditures 11,781.306 11,997.275 (32,312) (215.969) - - _ - 145,458 145,458 91.255 11.761,306 123,567 (32.312) 6766 2, 12,142.733 (361,427) 10:956,093 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures (212.000) (283.853) (71.853) - (42.859) (42,859) (212.000) (326,712) (114.712) 294.722 Other financing sources (uses): Operating transfers in 350,000 350,000 - - - - 350,000 350,000 - 568,735 Operating transfers out (138,000) (487,360) (349,360) - - - (138,000) (487,360) (349,360) (627,746) Parkland dedication - 51,617 51,617 - - - - 51,617 51,617 92,205 Parkland dedication for Edina BRA - 2.558.859 2,558,859 - - _ 2.558.859 Total other financing source 212.000 2.473.116 2.261.116 - - - _ 212.000 2.473.116 2.558.859 2,261.116 351.428 384.622 Excess (deficiency) of reve- nues and other financing sources over expenditures and other financing uses 8 - 2,189,263 x.169.26+ - (42,859) 142.659) - 2,146,404 2.146.404 679,344 Fund balance - January 1 4.050.081 12.110 4.062.191 3,382.847 Fund balance - December 31 S 6.239.344 (30.749) 6.206.591 4,062.191 CITY OF EDINA,'MINNESOTA Combined Balance Sheet - All Fund Types and Account Groups December 31, 1988 (with comparative totals for December 31, 1987) Proprietary Fiduciary Account groups Governmental fund types fund tyDe fund tYDes General ii General Totals _ Assets Special Geaerel Revenue Debt Service Capital Projects Enterprise Fixed Long -term Agency Assets Debt ' (memormdum only) 1987 1988 Cash (deficit) (Dotes I and 2) 7 1,928,086 - 2,556,865 (3,947,811) (404,597) - - - 132,543 279,151 Investments (notes 1 and 2) 4,618,288 - - 9,774,498 3,503,670 - - - 17,896,456 .10,425,125 Cash with plan administrators (note 8) - - _ _ _ 2,649,132 - - 2,649,132., 2,340,427 Receivables) Accounts 69,688 13,022 - 298,246 814,322 - - - 1,195,276 1,143,223 Special assessments - - 1,948,899 510,534 _ _ _ _ 2,459,433 3,017,997 Notes (notes 6.and 7) - - - - 225,546 - - - 225,546 281,684 Due from other funds (note 12) 51;039 - 200,000 577,186 245,000 - - 1;073,225 4,039,854 Due from -other governments 356,593 7,268 5,809 11101 - _ _ _ 370,771 522,367 Contracts receivable (note 7) - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 19,522 Inventory (note 1) 5,000 - - - 511,711 - - - 516,711 653,790 Prepaid ezpense- 275,693 - - _ - _ _ _ 275,693 155,564 Fixed assets (net of accumulated depreciation) (note 4) - -, - - 21,093,593 - 50,117,4.11 - 71,211,004 53,807,174 Amount available in debt service funds _ _ _ 2,741,008 2,741,008 3,752,591 Amount to be provided for retirement of long -term debt - - - _ 38.427,490 ° 38,427:490 23,981,600 . Total assets = 7.304.387 n 4.711.573 7.213.754. 25.989.245 2.649.132 50.117.411 41.168.498 ;139.174.290 104.420.089 Liabilities and Fund Equity Liabilities: Accounts payable - 287,857 - - 479,00E 768,278 - - - 1,535,140 979,485 Accrued interest payable - - - - 96,968 - - - 96,968 - Due to -other funds (note 12) 777,186 51,039 - - 245,000 - - - 1,073,225 4,039,854 Due to other governments - - 43,102 - - _ _ _ 43,102 29,036 .Deposits payable - - - 36,465 5,833 - - - 42,298 41,690 Due to participants (note 8) - - - - _ 2,649,132 - - 2,649,132 2,340,427 Accrued compensated absences (notes 1 and 5) - - - - _ _ _ 593,498 593,497 464,191 Deferred revenuo (note 6) - - 1,927,463 510,534 204,260 - -• - 2,642,257 3,260,595 Bonds payable (note S) - - - - - - 6,730,000 40.575.000 47,305,000 28.400,000 Total` liabilities 1 :065.043 11�m 1.970.565 1,026,004 B.050.339 2,649,132 41,168,498 55.980:620 39.575.278. , Fund equity - Investment in general fized assets - - - - _ _ 50,117,411 - 50;117,411 .35,591,779 Contributed capital - - - - 273,545 - - 273,545 _ .296,836." Retained earningst Reserved (note 13) - - - - .797,646 - - 797,646 145,445 .Unreserved - uadesignated - - - - 16,867,715 - - 16,867,715 17,985,878 Fund balances Reserved (note 13) 489,885. - 2,741,008 - _ _ _ _ 3,230,093 4,182,028 Unreserved - designated (note 13) 4,554,185 (30,749) - 4,455,576 _ _ _ _ 8,979;012 4,552,739 Unreserved - uadesignated - 1,19S.274 - - 1,732.174 _ _ 2,227,448 2.090.106. Total fund equity - 6,232,344 (30.749) 2,741,008 6,187,7S0 17.938.906 - 50.117.41E _ '83,193,670 64,844,811 Total liabilities and fund equity 7 7.304.387 20.200 4.711.573 7.21].754 25.989.245 2.649.132 50.117.411 4 L 16Bi498 " 139.174.290 104_420.Oa9 CITY Of EDINA, MINNESOTA Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in fund Balance - All Governmental fund Types Year ended December 31, 1988 (with comparative totals for year ended December 31, 1987) Governmental fund twee Totals General Special Debt Revenue Servine Capital Projects (memorandum 1988 only) 1987 Revenues& Taxes (note 3) S 7,433,321 - _ 2,420,239 9,853,560 8,486,440 Special assessments - - 1,074,793 425,257 11500,050 1,787,962 Franchise fee - 48,S28 - - 48,528 58,683 Licenses and permits 623,760 - _ - 623,760 710,282 Intergoveramental 2,154,799 54,071 - 216,850 2,425,720 3,010,203 Charges for services 740,708 - - - 740,708 652,389 Pines and forfeitures 532,257 - _ - 532,257 515,172 Interest on investments 116,759 - 23,010 391,678 533,647 785,228 Sale and rental of property 27,845 - _ 100,000 127,846 152,495 Miscellaneous 81.972 48.794 130.766 162.109 Total revenues 11.713.422 102.599 1,097.803 3.603.018 16.516.842 16.340.963 Expenditures: Currents General government 1,655,826 - - - 1,655,826 1,425,939 Public safety 5,122,392 - _ - 5,122,392 4,762,906 Public works 2,441,928 - - - 2,441,928 2,209,872 Parks 1,471,741 - - - 1,471,741 1,369,848 Unallocated general 321,166 - - - 321,166 340,300 Other 276,068 145,458 2,400 625,758 1,049,684 981,645 Capital outlays General government 15,088 - - - 15,088 26,737 Public safety 246,899 - - - 246,899 322,132 Public works 293,155 - _ - 293,155 271,756 Parks 123,567 - _ 19,128,752 19,252,319 8,454,683 Debt service: Bond principal - - 1,950,000 - 1,950,000 1,700,000 Interest and fiscal charges - - 2.170.163 - 2.170.163 2.299.429 Total expenditures 11,967.830 145.458 4.122.563 19.754.510 35.990.361 34.165.447 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures (254.408) (42.859) (3.024.760) (16.151.492) (19.473.519) (7.824.484) Other financing sources (uses)& Proceeds from issuance of bonds - _ _ 15,111,818 15,111,818 - Proceeds from sale of land _ _ _ 4,783,356 4,763,356 - Operating transfers in 350,000 - 2,596,071 874,699 3,822,770 3,500,179 Operating transfers out (516,805) - (554,894) (2,630,899) (3,702,598) (3,100,179) Parkland dedication 51,617 _ _ - 51,617 92,205 Parkland dedication for Edina BRA 2.558.859 2.558.859 351.128 Total other financing sources (uses) 2.443.671 - 2.043.177 18.138.974 22.625.822 843.633 Excess (deficiency) of revenues and other financing sources over expen- ditures and other financing uses 2,189,263 (42,859) (981,583) 1,987,482 3,152,303 (61980,851) Fund balance - January 1 4.050.081 12.116 3.722.591 4.200.268 11.985.050 18.965.901 Fund balance (deficit) - December 31 8 6.2_ •�. +` 130.719) &JAL ooe 6.1s7.750 15.137.35+ 11.9RS. M CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Combined Statement of Revenues, E:penditures and Changes in Fund Balance - All Governmental Fund Types Year ended December 31, 1988 (with comparative totals for year ended December 31, 1987) Other financing sources (uses): Proceeds from issuance of bonds Proceeds from sale of land Operating transfers in Operating transfers out Parkland dedication Parkland dedication for Edina BRA Total other financing sources (uses) Excess (deficiency) of revenues and other financing sources over expen- ditures and other financing uses Fund balance - January 1 Fund balance (deficit) - December 31 15,111,818 15,111,818 - 4,783,356 4,783,356 - 350,000 - 2,598,071 874,699 3,822,770 3,500,179 (516,805) - (554,894) (2,630,899) (3,702,598) (3,100,179) 51,617 _ _ - 51,617 92,205 2.558.859 _ - 2,558.859 351,428 2.443.671 2.043 177 16.138.974 22.625.822 843.633 2,189,263 (42,859) (981,583) 1,987,482 3,152,303 (6,980,851) 4.050.081 12.110 3.722.591 4.200.268 11.985.050 18.965.901 8 6.239.344 (30.749) 2.741.008 6.187.750 15.137,353 11.985.050 Governmental fund ypes Totals General Special Debt Revenue Service Capital Projects (memorandum 1988 only) 1987 Revenues: Taxes (note 3) 8 7,433,321 - _ 2,420,239 9,853,560 8,486,440 Special assessments - - 1,074,793 425,257 11500,050 1,787,962 Franchise fee - 4!,528 - - 48,528 58,683 Licenses and permits 623,760 - _ - 623,760 710,282 Intergovermental 2,154,799 54,071 - 216,850 2,425,720 3,010,203 Charges for services 740,706 - _ - 740,708 652,389 Fines and forfeitures 532,257 _ _ - 532,257 515,172 Interest on investments 118,759 - 23,010 391,878 533,647 785,228 Sale and rental of property 27,846 - - 100,000 127,846 152,495 Miscellaneous 61.972 _ 48,794 130,766 182,109 Total revenues 11.713,422 102.599 1.097,803 3.603.018 16.516.842 16.340.963 Expenditures: Current: General government 1,655,826 - _ - 1,655,826 1,425,939 Public safety 5,122,392 - - - 5,122,392 4,762,906 Public works 2,441,928 - _ - 2,441,928 2,209,872 Parks 1,471,741 - _ - 1,471,741 1,369,848 Unallocated general 321,166 - - - 321,166 340,300 Other 276,068 145,458 2,400 625,758 1,049,684 981,645 Capital outlay: General government 15,088 - - - 15,088 26,737 Public safety 246,899 - _ - 246,899 322,132 Public works 293,155 - _ - 293,155 271,756 Parks 123,567 _ - 19,128,752 19,252,319 8,454,883 Debt service: Bond principal - - 1,950,000 - 1,950,000 1,700,000 Interest and fiscal charges - - 2.170.163 - 2,170.163 2.299,429 Total expenditures 11.967.830 145.458 4.122.563 19.754.510 35.990.361 24.165.447 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures (254.408) (42.859) (3.024.760) (16.151.492) (19,473.519) (7.824.464) Other financing sources (uses): Proceeds from issuance of bonds Proceeds from sale of land Operating transfers in Operating transfers out Parkland dedication Parkland dedication for Edina BRA Total other financing sources (uses) Excess (deficiency) of revenues and other financing sources over expen- ditures and other financing uses Fund balance - January 1 Fund balance (deficit) - December 31 15,111,818 15,111,818 - 4,783,356 4,783,356 - 350,000 - 2,598,071 874,699 3,822,770 3,500,179 (516,805) - (554,894) (2,630,899) (3,702,598) (3,100,179) 51,617 _ _ - 51,617 92,205 2.558.859 _ - 2,558.859 351,428 2.443.671 2.043 177 16.138.974 22.625.822 843.633 2,189,263 (42,859) (981,583) 1,987,482 3,152,303 (6,980,851) 4.050.081 12.110 3.722.591 4.200.268 11.985.050 18.965.901 8 6.239.344 (30.749) 2.741.008 6.187.750 15.137,353 11.985.050 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Combined Statement of Changes in Financial Position - All Proprietary Fund Types Year ended December 31, 1988 (with comparative totals for year ended December 31, 1987) Sources of working capital: Operations: Net income (loss) Add items not requiring working capital: Depreciation Working capital provided by operations Proceeds from revenue bonds Contributed capital Decrease in other assets Transfer from other funds Increase in deposits Reduction in notes receivable Total sources of working capital Uses of working capital: Decrease in deposits payable Decrease in other liabilities Additions to property and equipment Reduction of long -term debt Transfers to other funds Total uses of working capital Enterprise funds 1988 1987 $ (369,081) 251,656 687,391 623,289 318,310 874,945 5,630,000 - - 308,481 50,817 48,862 229,828 - 608 - 6,714 5,322 6,236,277 1,237,610 13,870 50,817 48,862 2,405,411 980,151 50,000 35,000 350,000 400,000 2,856,228 1,477,883 Net increase (decrease) in working capital $ 3,380,049 (24�0.271) Elements of increase (decrease) in working capital: Cash Investments Receivables Due from other funds Inventory Prepaid expense Accounts payable Accrued interest payable Due to other funds Current portion of bonds payable 646,101 3,503,670 (90,176) (134,579) (400) (449,135) (96,968) 1,536 18,425 (806,333) 235,195 (52,467) (15,272) (252,054) 310,496 271,737 50,000 Net increase (decrease) in working capital $ 3.380.049 (240.271) CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Combined Statement of Revenuesf Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings All Proprietary Fund Types Year ended December 31, 1988 (with comparative totals for year ended December 31, 1987) Operating expenses: Disposal charges 2,621,462 Enterprise funds 2,058.,294 1,708,399 '1988 1987 Sales and cost of sales: 694,884 561,352 Sales 529,296 $ 5,181,955 5,103,281 Cost of sales 4,081,675 4,056,622. 6,744,384 Gross profit 1,100,280 1,046,659 Operating revenues: Interest on investments Charges for services 6,534,601 5,712,503 61,020 Total gross profit and operating 7,960 7,960 Federal aid revenues 7,634,881 6,759,162 Operating expenses: Disposal charges 2,621,462 2,187,999 Personal services 2,058.,294 1,708,399 Contractual services 1,409,739 1,084,.935.. Commodities 694,884 561,352 Central services 529,296 578,410, Depreciation 687.389 623,289 Total operating expenses 8,001,064 6,744,384 Operating income (loss) (366,183) 14,778 Nonoperating revenues (expenses): Interest on investments 116,187 93,087 Current value credit - MWCC 61,020 61,020 Rental income 7,960 7,960 Federal aid - 51,816 Donations 25,290 12,592 .Interest and fiscal charges (238,940) (97,690) Subsidy from general fund 16,337 98,047 Miscellaneous 9,248 10,046. Total nonoperating revenues (expenses) (2,898) 236,878 Income (loss) before operating transfers and contributions (369,081) 251,656 Net operating transfers out (120,172) (400,000) Net loss (489,253) (148,344) Add depreciation on contributed assets 23,291 11,645 Increase (decrease) in retained earnings (465,962) (136,699) Retained earnings - January 1 18,131,323 18,268,022 Retained earnings - December 31 $ 17.665.361 18,131,323 4 DORSEY LR WUITNEY • P•.n...-r ft •%Vw.. Poor$ ...... �'a.w•�•r�o.. 8800 FIRST BANR PLACE EAST MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 88408. (611�1) 340 -4000 T61[1t Q9•A6os TT.LCfoPIRR 16iQl:wo-h ea $12,970,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1989 City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota We have acted as Bond Counsel in connection with the issuance by the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the City), of its General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1989, dated originally as of November 1, 1989, in the total principal amount of $12,970,000 (the Bonds). The Bonds are registered as to both principal 'and., interest and are issuable in any authorized denomination which is a multiple of $5,000. The Bonds mature on January-1 in the years and amounts set forth below, and Bonds maturing in such years and.amounts bear interest from date of issue until paid or duly called for redemption at the .annual rates set forth opposite such years and amounts respectively: Year 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 Interest commencin g appearing Registrar fifteenth preceding' S Amount Rate Year Amount 185,000 % 1999 $1,035,000 130,000 2000 1,025,000 160,000 2001 1,115,000 170,000 2002 11100,000 555,000 2003 1,085,000 1,060,000 2004 1,070,000 4055,000 2005 11100,000 1,045,000 2006 1,080,000 Rate is payable semiannually on each January 1 and July 1, July 1,.'1990, to the registered owners of the Bonds of record in the bond register maintained by the described below as of the close of business on the day (whether or not a business day) of the immediately month... Bonds maturing on January 1, 1997 and thereafter are each subject to redemption and prepayment, at the option of the City and in whole or in part, and if in part, in inverse order of maturities and in $5,000 principal amounts selected by lot within any maturity, on January 1, 1996, and any. interest payment date thereafter, at a price equal to the principal thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued to the date of redemption. Interest on the Bonds is payable by check or draft mailed to the registered owners by in or a DORSEY & .WHITN.EY $12,970,000 General Obligation City of Edina, Tax Increment. Refunding Hennepin County, Minnesota Bonds, Series 1989 -2- successor bond registrar, transfer agent and paying agent (the Registrar), and the principal thereof is payable to the registered owner upon presentation and surrender. thereof at the principal office of the Registrar. For the purpose of this opinion, we , .examined. certified copies of certain proceedings taken by he. City-in the authorization,.sale and issuance of the Bonds, including the form of the Bonds, and certain other proceedings and documents furnished by the City. and. others. From our .examination. of such proceedings and other documents, assuming the authenticity thereof, the genuineness- of the signatures thereon, ,.anId the. accuracy of the facts stated therein., and based upon 'laws.,.. regulations, rulings and decisions in effect on the date hereof, it is our opinion: 1. The Bonds are in due form, have been duly .authorized., executed and delivered, and are valid and binding general obligations of the City enforceable in .accordance with their terms, except to the extent enforceability may be limited by State of Minnesota or United States laws relating,.. to. bankruptcy, reorganization, moratorium or creditors' rights generally. 2. The principal of and interest on the Bonds are payable primarily from tax increment revenues generated from the captured assessed value of taxable property within the tax increment financing districts in the City in which the project to be financed by the issuance of the Bonds is located, the collections of which the governing body of the City has estimated will produce amounts at least five percent in excess of the amounts needed to meet, when due, the principal and interest payments on the Bonds, but if necessary for payment of such principal and interest, ad valorem taxes are required by law to be levied on all taxable property in the City, which taxes are not subject to any limitation as to rate or amount. 3. Interest on the Bonds is not includable in gross income for federal income tax purposes or in taxable net income of individuals, estates or trusts for Minnesota income tax purposes. Interest on the Bonds is includable in taxable income of corporations and financial institutions for purposes of the Minnesota franchise tax. Interest on the Bonds is not an item of tax preference includable in alternative minimum taxable income DoRSEY & WHITNEY $12,970,000 General Obligation City of Edina, Tax Increment Refunding Hennepin County, Minnesota Bonds, Series 1989 -3- for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax applicable to all taxpayers or the Minnesota alternative minimum tax applicable to individuals, estates and trusts, but is includable in book income or in earnings and profits of corporations in determining alternative minimum tax imposed on corporations. The opinions set forth in this paragraph are subject to the condition that the City comply with all the requirements of the Code that must be satisfied subsequent to the issuance of the Bonds in order that interest thereon be, or continue to be, excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes. The City has covenanted in the resolution authorizing the issuance of the Bonds to comply with these continuing requirements. Failure of the City to comply with these requirements may result in the inclusion of interest on the Bonds in federal gross income and in Minnesota taxable net income, retroactive to the date of issuance of the Bonds. We express no opinion regarding other federal tax consequences arising with respect to the Bonds. We have not been asked, and have not undertaken, to review the accuracy, completeness or sufficiency of any offering materials relating to the Bonds, and accordingly, we express no opinion with respect thereto. Dated this day of 1989. Worksheet CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA - $12,970,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS DATE OF BONDS 11/01/89 DUE 01/01 PRICE NOT LESS THAN. $12,814,360.00 INTEREST RATES ONE RATE OF INTEREST EXPRESSED PER MATURITY, IN MULTIPLES OF 1 /20TH OR 1/8TH OF ONE, PERCENT , DESIGNATED IN ASCENDING ORDER. CALL. FEATURE ALL-BONDS MATURING IN THE YEARS 1997 . -_2006 ARE SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION AND PRIOR PAYMENT ON - 01/01/96. AND ON ANY;. INTEREST PAYMENT DATE THEREAFTER AT PAR PLUS' -ACCRUED INTEREST. YEAR PRINCIPAL BOND YEARS CUMULATIVE - - -- 1991 ----- - - - - -- 185,000 ------ - - - - -- 215.8333 ------ - - - - -- 2.15.8333 1992 130,000 281.6667 497.5000 1993 160,000 506.6667 1,004.1667 1994 170,000 708.3333 1,712.5000 1995 555,000 2,867.5000 4,580.0000 1996 1,060,000 6,536.6667 11,116.6667 1997 1,055,000 7,560.8333, 18,677.5000 1998 1,045,006 8,534.1667 27,211.6667 1999 1,035,000 9,487.5000 36,699.1667 2000 1,025,000 10,420.8333 47,120.0000 2001 1,115,000 12,450.8333 59,570.8333 2002 1,100,000 13,383.3333 72,954.1666 2003 1,085,000 14,285.8333 87,239.9999 2004 1,070,000 15,1.58.3333 102,398.3332 2005 1,100,000 16,683.3333 119,081.6665 2006 1,080,000 17,460.0000 136,541.6665 $12,970,000 136,541.6665 AVERAGE MATURITY - 10.52750 YEARS Bid Form TO: Members of City Council, Edina, Minnesota RE: $12,970,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1989 For all of the referenced Bonds in accordance with the terms and conditions as set forth in the Official. Statement for the issue, we offer to pay the City $ (not less than $12,814,360), plus accrued interest from November 1, 1989, to the delivery date with the condition that the Bonds mature on February land bear interest at the coupon rates. as follows: Year of Coupon Initial Year of Coupon Initial Maturity Amount Rate Price Maturity Amount Rate Price 1991 $ 185,000 % 1999 $1,035,000 % 1992 130,000 % 2000 1,025,000 % 1993 160,000 % 2001 1,115,000 % 1994 170,000 % 2002 11100,0.00 % 1995 555,000 % 2003 1,085,000 % 1996 1,060,000 % 2004 1,070,000 X 1997 1,055,000 % 2005 1,100,000 1998 1,045,000 % 2006 11080,000 % In accordance with the Notice of Sale, we certify that (1) the above repre- sents the initial offering price of the Bonds to the public (not including bond houses and brokers or similar persons or organizations acting.in the capacity of underwriters or wholesalers) at which a substantial amount of the Bonds (not less than ten percent of each maturity) will. be sold, (2) the prices will not be greater than those shown above and (3) that the pices are not unreasonably low. This bid is for prompt acceptance or rejection and is conditional upon delivery of the referenced Bonds. Attached hereto, as evidence of our good faith, is our certified or cashier's check or treasurers check in the amount of $259,400. If our bid is not accepted, said check is to be promptly returned to us. Respectfully submitted, Account Manager(*) By ( *) Representing associated firms, as listed elsewhere on this form. NOT PART OF OFFICIAL BID According to our calculations the following is accurate: Net Interest Cost = $ Net Interest Rate - Received above described good faith check. Public Financial Systems, Inc. The foregoing offer is hereby accepted by the issuer this 6th day of November, 1989 by the following qualified officers. Frederick S. Richards Kenneth E. Rosland Mayor City Manager I I I I Bid Form TO: Members of City Council, Edina, Minnesota RE: $12,910,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1989 For all of the referenced Bonds in accordance with the terms and conditions as set forth in the Official Statement for the issue, we offer to pay the City $ (not less than $12,814,360), plus accrued interest . from November 1, 1989, to the delivery date with the condition that the Bonds mature--on February 1 and bear interest at the.coupon.r.a.tes as follows: Year of Coupon Initial Year of Coupon Initial Maturity Amount Rate. Price Maturity Amount Rate Price 1991 $ 185,000 % 1999 $1,035,000 % 1992 130,000 % 2000 .1,025,000 % 1993 160,000 % 2001 1';;115, 000 % .1994 110,000 % 2002 1,100,000 % 1995 555,000 % 2003 1,085,000 % 1996 1,060,000 % 2004 1,070,000 % 1997 1,055,060 % 2005 1,10.0,000 % 1998 1,045,000 % 2006 1,080,000 % In accordance with the Notice of Sale, we- certify that (1) the above repre- sents the initial offering price of the Bonds to the public (not including bond houses and brokers or similar persons or organizations acting in the capacity of underwriters or wholesalers) at which a substantial amount of the Bonds (not less than ten percent of each maturity) will be sold, (2) the prices will not be greater than those shown above and (3) that the pices are not unreasonably low. This bid is for prompt acceptance. or rejection and is conditional upon delivery of_the referenced Bonds. Attached hereto, as evidence of our good faith, is our certified or cashier's check or treasurers check in the amount of $259,400. If our bid is not accepted, said check is to be promptly returned to us. Respectfully submitted, Account Manager(*) By ( *) Representing associated firms, as listed elsewhere on this form. NOT PART OF OFFICIAL BID According to our calculations the following is. accurate: Net Interest Cost = S Net Interest Rate - Received above described good faith check. Public Financial Systems, Inc. The foregoing offer is hereby accepted by the issuer this 6th day of November, 1989 by the following qualified officers. Frederick S. Richards Kenneth E. Ros and Mayor City Manager Bid Form TO: Members of City Council, Edina, Minnesota RE: $12,970,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1989 For all of the referenced Bonds in accordance with the terms and conditions as set forth in the Official Statement for the issue, we offer to pay the City $ (not less than $12,814,360), plus accrued interest from November 1, 1989, to the delivery date with the condition that the Bonds mature on February 1 and bear interest at the coupon rates as follows: Year of Coupon Initial Year of Coupon Initial Maturity Amount Rate Price Maturity Amount Rate Price 1991 $ 185,000 % 1999 $1,035,000 % 1992 130,000 % 2000 1,025,000 -% 1993 160,000 % 2001 1,115,.000 % 1994 170,000 % 2002 1,100,000 % 1995 555,000 % 2003 1,085,000 % 1996 1,060,000 % 2004 1,070,000 % 1997 1,055,000 % 2005 19100,000 % 1998 1,045,000 % 2006 1,080,000 % In accordance with the Notice of Sale, we certify that (1) the above repre- sents the initial offering price of the Bonds to the public (not including bond houses and brokers or similar persons or organizations acting in the capacity of underwriters or wholesalers) at which a substantial amount of the Bonds (not less than ten percent of each maturity) will. be sold, (2) the prices will not be greater than those shown above and (3) that the pices are not unreasonably low. This bid is for prompt acceptance or rejection and is conditional upon delivery of the referenced Bonds. Attached hereto, as evidence of our good faith, is our certified or cashier's check or treasurers check in the amount of $259,400. If our bid is not accepted, said check is to be promptly returned to us. Respectfully submitted, Account Manager(*) By ( *) Representing associated firms, as listed elsewhere on this form. NOT PART OF OFFICIAL BID According to our calculations the following is accurate: Net Interest Cost = $ Net Interest Rate - % Received above described good faith check. Public Financial Systems, Inc. The foregoing offer is hereby accepted by the issuer this 6th day of November, 1989 by the following qualified officers. Frederick S. Richards Kenneth E. Rosland Mayor City Manager FORM OF ISSUER'S CERTIFICATE OF OFFICIAL STATEMENT We the undersigned, being the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, Minnesota, do hereby certify that we have examined the attached "Official Statement" prepared in connection with the sale of $12,970,000 General Obliga- tion Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1989, of the City and find that to the best of our knowledge and belief such statement does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact which should be included therein, for the purpose for which the Official Statement is to be used, or which is necessary in order to make the statements made therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. Witness our hands this day of City of Edina, Minnesota . 1989. Frederick S. Richards Kenneth E. Rosland Mayor City Manager (SEAL) FINANCIAL ADVISOR Public Financial Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, has acted as financial advisor to the City concerning the Bonds and has assisted the City with the preparation of this Official Statement. PD I ": 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 310704 10/25/89 40.00 PATRICIA JOHNSON SERVICES 40.00 * 310705 10/25/89 40.00 RACHEL MCLAUGHLIN SERVICES 40.00 * 310706 10/25/89 40.00 SEVERINE MUTEL SERVICES 40.00 * 310707 10/25/89 116.82 CARLSON TRACTOR CREDIT 310707 10/25/89 122.20 CARLSON TRACTOR BLADES 310707 10/25/89 116.82- CARLSON TRACTOR CREDIT 310707 10/25/89 116.82- CARLSON TRACTOR CREDIT 5.38 * 310708 10/25/89 15.00 DEPT OF LABOR CERT 310708 10/25/89 15.00 DEPT OF LABOR CERT 30.00 * 310709 10/25/89 75.00 PETER BAUER PERFORMANCE 75.00 * 310710 10/25/89 20.00 ELLIOTT MARSTON CONFERENCE 310710 10/25/89 40.80 ELLIOTT MARSTON MILEAGE 60.80 * 310711 10/25/89 24.00 DIANE SANKEY LIC PLATES 310711 10/25/89 44.26 DIANE SANKEY PARKING 68.26 * 310712 10/25/89 60.00 GARY SMIEJA REPAIR PARTS 60.00 * 310713 10/25/89 96.00 ROXANNE SEIDEL PRO SERV 96.00 * 310714 10/25/89 250.00 MARK PROMOTIONS ADVERTISING 250.00 * 310715 10/25/89 53.70 VOTER REG /ELEC SEC POSTAGE 53.70 * 310716 10/25/89 43.92 ART GOKEY MILEAGE 43.92 * 310717 10/25/89 123.75 STERLING FENCE FENCE REPAIR 123.75 * 310718 10/25/89 437.55 AEC ENGINEER /DESIGN PRO SERV ENG 437.55 * 310719 10/25/89 19.90 NEW SWEDEN 88 PAYMENT 19.90 * 310720 10/25/89 6.00 DRIVER /VEHICLE SERV LIC PLATES 60 W 11 -06 -89 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4201 - 627 -62 10- 4201- 627 -62 10- 4201 - 627 -62 10- 4540 - 560 -56 116226 3262 10- 4540 - 560 -56 116138 3262 10- 4540 - 560 -56 116226 3262 10- 4540- 560 -56 116226 3262 40- 4310 - 801 -80 39424 3992 40- 4310 - 801 -80 69425 3991 30- 4224 - 781 -78 10- 4202 - 480 -48 10- 4208 - 480 -48 10- 4310 - 560 -56 10- 4802 - 280 -28 40- 4540- 810 -81 30- 4201 - 781 -78 30- 4214 - 781 -78 4507 10- 4290 - 140 -14 40- 4208 - 806 -80 40- 4248 - 801 -80 3987 40- 4201 - 800 -80 2112 30- 4516 - 781 -78 10- 4504- 440 -44 1 + + Awl 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -06 -89 PAGE 2 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 6.00 310721 10/25/89 59.40 BUDGET LIGHTING INC REPAIR LITE 28- 4248 - 702 -70 4306 3719 310721 10/25/89 70.20 BUDGET LIGHTING INC REPAIR LITE 28- 4248 - 702 -70 4163 3719 129.60 k 310722 10/25/89 192.50 MARK HURD AERIAL PHOTO 10- 4901 - 260 -26 L600 192.50 310723 10/25/89 455.00 OUTPOST HUNT /SPORTS AMMO /GUN RANGE 29- 4572 - 722 -72 1010 3837 310723 10/25/89 182.00 OUTPOST HUNT /SPORTS AMMO /GUN RANGE 29- 4572- 722 -72 101 3619 637.00 310724 10/25/89 969.69 ECOMARC INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 3072 3975 .969.69 310725 10/25/89 400.00 ANIXTER DISTR REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 3875 400.00 310726 10/25/89 1,000.00 MARY D WALTERS' PHONE CONSULTING 10- 4256 - 510 -51 1,000.00 310727 10/25/89 120.00 RYAN CONSTRUCTION REFUND 10- 3095 - 000 -00 120.00 * 310728 10/27/89 80.00 LUCY M ROSCHE CLEANING 27- 4201 - 662 -66 30560 4014 310728 10/25/89 80.00 LUCY M ROSCHE CLEANING 27- 4201 - 662 -66 160.00 * 310729 10/25/89 474.64 INDUSTRIAL SPRINKLER REPAIRS 50- 4248 - 841 -84 M06298 4128 474.64 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 310732 10/25/89 7.00 LEAANNS SEWING DECO GEAR REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 440 -44 89032 7.00 310733 10/25/89 875.00 MICHELLE BERGMAN PRO SERV 30- 4201 - 781 -78 875.00 310734 10/27/89 72.50 RIEDELL SHOE INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 702 -70 20488 3700 310734 10/25/89 413.50 , RIEDELL SHOE INC RENTAL SKATES 28- 4504 - 702 -70 20017 3700 486.00 310735 10/25/89 385.00 ZAHNER CONSTRU CONSTRUCTION 11- 4201 - 127 -12 385.00 310736 10/25/89 6.00 -: MPLS AREA ASSO DUES 10- 4204 - 200 -20 310736 10/25/89 65.00 MPLS AREA ASSO DUES 10- 4204 - 200 -20 310736 10/25/89 6.00 MPLS AREA ASSO DUES 10- 4204 - 200 -20 65.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 310738 10/25/89 137.40 SALLY DIST GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 627 -62 31411 4149 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 137.40 * 310739 10/25/89 6,825.00 THE DEVITT CO INC ADVERTISING 6,825.00 * 310740 10/25/89 1,565.00 23- 4588 - 611 -61 1083 3866 1,565.00 * 310741 10/25/89 30.40 MARIAN ALSTAD PERFORMANCE 30.40 * 310742 10/25/89 219.36 30- 4224 - 781 -78 219.36 * 310743 10/25/89 25.00 BOB CONNOLLY PERFORMANCE 25.00 * 310744 10/25/89 85.00 30- 4224 - 781 -78 85.00 * 310745 10/25/89 25.00 BILL DIETRICHSON PERFORMANCE 25.00 * 310746 10/25/89 85.00 30- 4224 - 781 -78 85.00 * 310747 10/25/89 30.00 MARGARET GUST PERFORMANCE 30.00 * 310748 10/25/89 30.00 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30.00 * 310749 10/25/89 25.00 JOHN H EKLUND HAULING 25.00 * 310750 10/25/89 25.00 10- 4201 - 500 -50 R10191 4172 25.00 * 310751 10/25/89 100.00 100.00 * 310752 10/25/89 50.00 50.00 * 310753 10/25/89 30.00 30.00 * 310754 10/25/89 25.00 25.00 * 310755 10/25/89 680.00 680.00 * 310756 10/25/89 275.00 275.00 * CHECK REGISTER 11 -06 -89 PAGE 3 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE SHHSC HUMAN SERVICES 10- 4201 - 509 -50 THE DEVITT CO INC ADVERTISING 30- 4214 - 781 -78 4080 BLOOMINGTON CERAMICS CRAFT SUPPLIES 23- 4588 - 611 -61 1083 3866 BENSON PREMIER EYEGLASSES 10- 4262 - 301 -30 MARIAN ALSTAD PERFORMANCE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 JUDY LIEBER PERFORMANCE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 KATHY GUSTAFSON PERFORMANCE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 BOB CONNOLLY PERFORMANCE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 J KANJANAVIVITCH PERFORMANCE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 MARGARET GUST PERFORMANCE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 BILL DIETRICHSON PERFORMANCE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 AGNES FINE PERFORMANCE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 BACHMANS PERFORMANCE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 MARGARET GUST PERFORMANCE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 HARRY HEIM PERFORMANCE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 JUDY LIEBER PERFORMANCE 30 -4224- 781 -78 JOHN H EKLUND HAULING 10- 4250 - 644 -64 DITCH WITCH OF MN IRRIGATION 10- 4201 - 500 -50 R10191 4172 ko w J 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 310757 10/25/89 1,531.12 450.00 RES WATER WELL 1,531.12 * 310758 10/25/89 200.00 450.00 * 200.00 * 310759 10/25/89 47.00 310762 10/26/89 47.00 * CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION TC TREE TRUST CONTRACT REPAIRS PHYLLIS FAHEY REFUND CORPORATE REPORT SUBSCRIPTION 11 -06 -89 PAGE 4 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4248 - 643 -64 4153 30- 3507 - 000 -00 10- 4206 - 140 -14 * * * * ** 310761 10/26/89 450.00 RES WATER WELL CONSTRUCTION 11- 4201 - 127 -12 450.00 * 310762 10/26/89 155.00 MERLE ANDERSON SERVICES /GOLF ODME 27- 4248 - 667 -66 155.00 * 310763 10/26/89 672.00 LUIS HERNANDEZ REFEREE 27- 4100 - 667 -66 672.00 * 310764 10/26/89 17.50 DORIS WOLTER SERVICES 30- 3501 - 000 -00 17.50 * 310765 10/26/89 165.00 ADVANCED LEGAL ED CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 41406 165.00 * 310766 10/26/89 75.00 ARROWWOOD RESORT CONFERENCE 10- 4202 - 420 -42 75.00 * 310767 10/26/89 300.00 AIRSIGNAL INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 430 -42 300.00 * 310768 10/26/89 250.00 ASSO OF TRAINING CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 1028 310768 10/26/89 250.00 ASSO OF TRAINING CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 1023 310768 10/26/89 250.00 ASSO OF TRAINING CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 1017 310768 10/31/89 15.00 ASSO OF TRAINING DUES 10- 4204 - 420 -42 1041 310768 10/26/89 15.00 ASSO OF TRAINING DUES /SUBSCRIPTION 10- 4204 - 420 -42 1153 780.00 * 310769 10/26/89 31.28 MPH INDUSTRIES INC EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274 - 420 -42 MC1083 31.28 * 310770 10/26/89 105.00 BCA /TRAINING CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 T00847 105.00 * 310771 10/26/89 335.00 EMPLOYERS ED SERVICE CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 335.00 * 310772 10/27/89 100.00 ARTHUR FELSEN GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 100.00 * 310773 10/27/89 375.00 RAMSEY FOUNDATION SEMINAR 10- 4202 - 480 -48 375.00 * 310774 t' 10/26/89 187.00 GRAND VIEW LODGE CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 06753 J * * * -CKS J 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -06 -89 PAGE 5 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 187.00 * 310775 10/26/89 443.13 STENCIL CUT /SUPP CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 10899 4220 443.13 * 310776 10/26/89 120.00 EDINA ATHLETIC ADVERTISING 10- 4204 - 600 -60 120.00 * 310777 10/26/89 916.36 PAUL KENNEDY SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 500 -50 4273 916.36 * 310778 10/26/89 15.00 DEPT OF LABOR CODE ENFORC 28- 4248 - 702 -70 69435 15.00 * 310779 10/26/89 22.85 ARROW APPLIANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 520 -52 4159 22.85 * 310780 10/26/89 91.00 WAHL & WAHL INC MAINT AGREEMENT 10- 4288 - 510 -51 104614 91.00 * 310781 10/26/89 10.00 RALPH MOUDRY REFUND 10- 1145- 000 -00 10.00 * 310782 10/26/89 236.00 THERES TRUNLGER AMBULANCE REFUND 10- 3180 - 000 -00 236.00 * 310783 10/26/89 116.00 COLLEEN C RYAN AMBULANCE REFUND 10- 3180 - 000 -00 116.00 * 310784 10/26/89 245.00 DIXIE KOPP AMBULANCE BILLING 10- 3180 - 000 -00 245.00 * 310785 10/26/89 265.00 KAUFMAN SIGN CO SIGNAGE 10- 4504 - 520 -52 14017 3862 265.00 * 310786 10/27/89 23.14 MOORLANE INC SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 627 -62 19980 4127 23.14 * 310787 10/27/89 18.80 LYLE AXT GUN RANGE PRODUCT 29- 4624 - 722 -72 310787 .10/27/89 35.31 LYLE AXT REIMBURSEMENT 29- 4624 - 722 -72 54.11 * 310788 10/27/89 125.00 MICHAEL OTTE SERVICES 30- 4224 - 781 -78 125.00 * 310789 10/27/89 50.00 WAYZATA CHILDREN SERVICES 30- 4224 - 781 -78 50.00 * 310790 10/27/89 50.00 EDEN PRAIRIE COMM SERVICES 30- 4224 - 781 -78 50.00 * 310791 10/27/89 50.00 EDINA HS CHAMBER SERVICES 30- 4224 - 781 -78 50.00 * 310792 10/27/89 1,190.00 RON OLSON ELECTRIC CONSTRUCTION 11- 4201 - 127 -12 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 310793 310794 310795 310796 310797 310797 310798 310799 310800 310801 310802 310803 310804 310805 310805 310806 310806 310807 310807 310807 310808 310809 10/27/89 10/27/89 10/27/89 10/27/89 10/27/89 10/27/89 10/27/89 10/27/89 10/27/89 10/27/89 10/27/89 10/27/89 10/27/89 10/27/89 10/27/89 10/27/89 10/27/89 10/27/89 10/27/89 10/27/89 10/26/89 10/27/89 AMOUNT 1,190.00 60.00 60.00 * 4,134.00 4,134.00 * 1,996.92 1,996.92 * 51.50 51.50 * 117.00 499.99 616.99 * 7,307.50 7,307.50 * 600.00 600.00 * 12.95 12.95 * 53.00 53.00 * 47.52 47.52 * 668.00 668.00 * 350.00 350.00 * 22.05 7.00 29.05 * 21.95 3.50 25.45 * 25.00 30.00 30.00 85.00 * 18,783.00 18,783.00 * 23.50 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 11 -06 -89 PAGE 6 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE MOREAU SANKEY 2 TEXTS 10- 4504 - 200 -20 DAVID J ALLEN GROU PRO SERVICES 30- 4201 - 781 -78 MONA /MEYER /MCGRATH PRO SERVICES 10- 4201 - 500 -50 35924 ALCO CAPITAL RES COPIER RENTAL 28- 4504- 702 -70 82914 4282 CITYLINE ADVERTISING 30- 4214 - 781 -78 344 4221 CITYLINE ADVERTISING 30- 4214 - 782 -78 79 4291 FEDERAL SIGNAL CORP EQUIP REPLAC 10- 4901 - 460 -46 FEDERAL WARNING SYST EQUIPMENT 10- 4901 - 460 -46 2853 MINN COMM RENTAL 10- 4226 - 301 -30 THE PRINT SHOP PRINTING 29- 4600 - 721 -72 88445 4298 CHERYL OLSON MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 420 -42 CONSTR MATERIALS CAR STOPS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 73764 3751 MORNINGSIDE SIDEWALK 60- 1300 - 286 -04 RICHARD MYRE MEETING EXP 10- 4206 - 440 -44 RICHARD MYRE PARKING 10- 4208 - 440 -44 RICHARD HELMER MEETING EXP 10- 4206 - 440 -44 RICHARD HELMER PARKING 10- 4208 - 440 -44 MN AMATEUR HOCKEY ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 822 -82 MN AMATEUR HOCKEY ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 842 -84 MN AMATEUR HOCKEY ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 862 -86 ENGCO CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION 60- 1300 - 005 -20 KEN PETERSON MEETING 50- 4206 - 820 -82 I 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -06 -89 PAGE 7 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 23.50 * 310810 10/30/89 54.00 LEROY H UNTE REFUND 10- 3095 - 490 -49 54.00 * 310811 10/30/89 96.00 ROXANNE SEIDEL PRO SERV 30- 4201 - 781 -78 96.00 * 310812 10/30/89 60.00 DON HADD DUES 10- 4204 - 490 -49 60.00 * 310813 10/30/89 203.00 PRESTO CLEANING SYST CLEANING RUG 27- 4288 - 662 -66 2430 3954 203.00 * 310814 10/30/89 10.00 BONNIE GASPERLIN REFUND 10- 1145 - 000 -00 10.00 * 310815 10/30/89 445.00 CONTACT MOBILE COMM EQUIPMENT 10- 4901 - 650 -64 12694 3599 445.00 * 310816 10/30/89 1,210.88 MINNESOTA UC FUND UNEMPLOMENT INS 10- 4160- 510 -51 1,210.88 * 310817 10/30/89 66.00 SEDGWICK HTG /AIR CON RERUND 10- 3130 - 000 -00 66.00 * 310818 10/30/89 1,700.00 AIA SANDBLAST CO IRRIGATION BLOWOUT 27- 4200 - 664 -66 1102 3890 1,700.00 * 310819 10/30/89 30.00 CALHOUN ISLE CONTRACT SERV 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30.00 * 310820 10/30/89 40.00 HELGESON PRESS INC REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 3054 3818 40.00 * 310821 10/30/89 250.18 CONNEY SAFETY PROD MEDICAL SUPPLIES 10- 4642 - 560 -56 966548 3986 250.18 * 310822 10/30/89 175.15 NATL MOWER CO REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 032595 4000 175.15 * 310823 10/30/89 3,134.75 DEDE HENSEL PROF SERVICES 28- 4201 - 701 -70 3,134.75 * 310824 10/30/89 83.20 RUTH SCHMOLL PETTY CASH 10- 4504 - 440 -44 83.20 * 310825 10/30/89 804.89 JOHN KEPRIOS CONFERENCE 10- 4202 - 600 -60 804.89 * 310826 10/30/89 286.90 ROBELIN DISPLAY INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 286.90 * 310827 10/30/89 850.00 RICHARD G LARSON PROF SERV 10- 4201 - 781 -78 850.00 * 40 0 to I 11 -06 -89 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4248 - 520 -52 60- 1300 - 015 -20 27- 4248 - 667 -66 4288 4331 27- 4540 - 669 -66 90182 3911 60- 1300 - 013 -18 10- 4202 - 482 -48 10- 4502-420 -42 10- 4204 - 440 -44 17323 10- 4233 - 440 -44 25158 4032 60- 1300 - 289 -04 78224 40- 4202 - 800 -80 10- 4542 - 325 -30 �z 10- 4542 - 325 -30 s 10- 4542 - 325 -30 1989 CITY OF EDINA 3942 CHECK REGISTER 3679 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 310828 10/30/89 80.00 MN DEPT OF HEALTH LICENSE 80.00 * 310829 10/31/89 26,602.76 WH CATES CONSTR REMODELING 26,602.76 * 310830 10/31/89 120.00 AD SCHLAGEMEISTER REPAIRS DOOR 120.00 * 310831 10/31/89 212.80 STRUCTURAL WOOD CORP REPAIR PARTS 212.80 * 310832 10/31/89 58.26 SANDRA D LEWIS REFUND /TREE TRIMMING 58.26 * 310833 10/31/89 60.00 NEHA DUES 60.00 * * * * * ** 310835 10/31/89 33.05 CALLAGHAN & CO BOOK 33.05 * 310836 10/31/89 60.00 INTERN SOCIETY OF DUES 60.00 * 310837 10/31/89 2,745.00 CANTUS CORP COMPUTER PROGRAM 2,745.00 * 310838 10/31/89 851.39 COMM OF TRANSP TESTING SERV 851.39 * 310839 10/31/89 182.06 RICHARD PELINKA SCHOOL 182.06 * * * * * ** 310A01 10/30/89 63.94 3M CO 3M RED LETTERS 310A01 10/25/89 310.94 3M CO SIGNS 310A01 10/30/89 66.42 3M CO 3M RED LETTERS 310A01 10/30/89 253.75 3M CO EXEMPTION CERT 310A01 10/25/89 65.00 3M CO SIGNS 760.05 * 310A02 10/27/89 23.50- 50 & FRANCE BUS ASSN MEETING 310A02 10/27/89 23.50 50 & FRANCE BUS ASSN MEETING .00 * * * * * ** 310A07 10/25/89 201.40 ALL -AMER BOTTLING MIX * * * * ** 201.40 * I 11 -06 -89 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4248 - 520 -52 60- 1300 - 015 -20 27- 4248 - 667 -66 4288 4331 27- 4540 - 669 -66 90182 3911 60- 1300 - 013 -18 10- 4202 - 482 -48 10- 4502-420 -42 10- 4204 - 440 -44 17323 10- 4233 - 440 -44 25158 4032 60- 1300 - 289 -04 78224 40- 4202 - 800 -80 10- 4542 - 325 -30 3942 10- 4542 - 325 -30 3679 10- 4542 - 325 -30 3942 10- 4542 - 325 -30 3942 10- 4542 - 325 -30 3679 50- 4206 - 820 -82 50- 4206 - 820 -82 50- 4632 - 842 -84 8 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA VENDOR CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 31OA11 10/30/89 23.96 31OA11 10/30/89 93.36 ADT SECURITY SYS. ALARM SERVICE 117.32 * * * * ** ALTERNATOR REBUILD BATTERY 31OA14 10/25/89 20.84 STARTER ALTERNATOR REBUILD 20.84* 29-95 * * * * ** GLOVES AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE 310A19 10/25/89 493.84 AMER. PHOTO COPY GENERAL SUPPLIES 493.84 * * * * ** ASTLEFORD INTL WHEEL SEAL 31OA21 10/27/89 185.50 185.50 * * * * ** 31OA29 10/25/89 139.20 139.20 * * * * ** 31OA39 10/30/89 59.28 31OA39 10/30/89 98.90 31OA39 10/30/89 148.90 31OA39 10/25/89 323.40 31OA39 10/30/89 58.08 688.56 * * * * ** 31OA41 10/25/89 252.37 31OA41 10/30/89 189.04 441.41 * * * * * ** 31OA45 10/27/89 156.19 156.19 * * * * * ** 31OA53 10/25/89 205.01 205.01 * * * * * ** 31OA80 10/25/89 41.20 41.20 * * * * * ** CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACE SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS ACE SUPPLY STACK PARTS ACTION RENTAL CENTER GENERAL SUPPLIES ADVON LAUNDRY /UNIFORMS ADT SECURITY SYS. ALARM SERVICE ALBINSON PAINT ALTERNATOR REBUILD BATTERY ALTERNATOR REBUILD REPIAR PARTS ALTERNATOR REBUILD STARTER ALTERNATOR REBUILD SAFETY GLASS ALTERNATOR REBUILD GLOVES AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE MEAT AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE MEAT AMER. PHOTO COPY GENERAL SUPPLIES AMERICAN SHARECOM TELEPHONE ASTLEFORD INTL WHEEL SEAL 40 4 11 -06 -89 PAGE 9 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4540 - 520 -52 97349 3998 40- 4540 - 802 -80 97376 3977 * ** -CKS 28- 4504 - 702 -70 140564 2058 * ** -CKS 30- 4262 - 782 -78 278861 3695 * ** -CKS 30- 4304 - 782 -78 4288 * ** -CKS 40- 4504 - 801 -80 588156 3734 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 440 -44 1716 4094 10- 4540 - 560 -56 13720 3999 10- 4540 - 560 -56 9116 4193 10- 4642 - 560 -56 1715 3935 40- 4504 - 801 -80 1717 4095 * ** -CKS 27- 4624 - 663 -66 27- 4624 - 663 -66 * ** -CKS 10- 4504- 420 -42 E30379 * ** -CKS 10- 4256- 510 -51 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 4106 * ** -CKS On- 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 31OA91 10/25/89 40.60 12179 40.60 * * * * * ** 31OA96 10/25/89 166.00 2086 AVR INC 166.00 * * * * * ** 12421 31OA98 10/27/89 1,234.05 ^29- 310A98 10/25/89 1,008.00 31OA98 10/27/89 504.00 31OA98 10/27/89 298.55 31OA98 10/27/89 266.57 31OA98 10/25/89 119.30 31OA98 10/25/89 767.70 31OA98 10/25/89 179.28 2086 BACH -BILL 4,377.45 * * * * ** 310805 10/25/89 20.00 310605 10/25/89 3.79 310605 10/25/89 18.39 31OB05 10/25/89 9.84 310605 10/25/89 34.00 BACH -BILL OFFICE SUPPLIES 86.02 * * * * * ** BADGER METER INC 310607 10/27/89 1,139.25 310607 10/27/89 1,139.25 40- 1220 - 000 -00 601422 2,278.50 * * * * * ** 310613 10/30/89 1,521.00 1,521.00 * * * * * ** 310617 10/25/89 140.80 310617 10/25/89 32,734.45 32,875.25 * 310618 10/25/89 61.34 61.34 * * * * * ** 310627 10/27/89 131.00 310627 10/27/89 296.00 310627 10/27/89 245.00 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION AUTO SOUND /ENTRONIX CONTRACTED REPAIRS AUTOMOBILE SERV CTR REPAIR WORK 11 -06 -89 PAGE 10 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4248 - 560 -56 2990 10- 4248 - 560 -56 4663 3974 AVR INC CONCRETE 10- 4528 - 314 -30 12179 AVR INC CONCRETE 10- 4528- 314 -30 11356 2086 AVR INC CONCRETE 10- 4528- 314 -30 12421 AVR INC CONCRETE 40- 4528 - 803 -80 12021 AVR INC CONCRETE 40- 4528 - 803 -80 12038 2086 AVR INC CONCRETE 40- 4552 - 900 -80 10490 2086 AVR INC CONCRETE 40- 4552 - 900 -80 11614 2086 AVR INC CONCRETE 40- 4552 - 900 -80 10678 2086 BACH -BILL PRO SERV 30- 4201 - 781 -78 BACH -BILL POSTAGE 30- 4290 - 781 -78 BACH -BILL GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 781 -78 BACH -BILL GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 BACH -BILL OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516- 781 -78 BADGER METER INC WATER METERS 40- 1220 - 000 -00 601421 BADGER METER INC WATER METERS 40- 1220 - 000 -00 601422 BARR ENGINEERING PRO SERV BFI RECYCLING SYS RECYCLING BFI RECYCLING SYS RECYCLING BATTERY WAREHOUSE BRAKE SHOES BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DEL BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DEL BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DEL 41-4201 - 900 -90 10- 4226 - 507 -50 10067 10- 4226 - 507 -50 10043 10- 4540 - 560 -56 65754 3748 50- 4626 - 822 -82 50- 4626 - 842 -84 50- 4626 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -06 -89 PAGE 11 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 672.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 310830 10/27/89 10.46 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 140 -14 509224 310830 10/30/89 20.68 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 140 -14 511201 310630 10/25/89 28.60 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 160 -16 506878 310630 10/30/89 6.14 BERTELSON BROS. INC. CALENDAR 10- 4504 - 260 -26 511201 310B30 10/27/89 8.32 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 509224 310830 10/25/89 10.80 BERTELSON BROS. INC. STAPLER 10- 4504 - 301 -30 506878 310630 10/30/89 12.38 BERTELSON BROS. INC. PENS 10- 4504 - 301 -30 511201 310830 10/25/89 3.91 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 506878 310630 10/25/89 160.49 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 506878 310630 10/25/89 13.53 BERTELSON BROS. INC. MARKERS 10- 4504 - 510 -51 500812 310630 10/30/89 51.07 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 511201 310630 10/25/89 13.53- BERTELSON BROS. INC. CREDIT 10- 4504 - 510 -51 310630 10/27/89 21.67 BERTELSON BROS. INC. SIGNAGE 10- 4504 - 520 -52 509990 310B30 10/31/89 22.68 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 628 -62 310630 10/27/89 27.33 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 628 -62 508910 310830 10/25/89 4.80 BERTELSON BROS. INC. SUPPLIES 10- 4512 - 520 -52 507607 310630 10/27/89 184.07 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 440 -44 508352 4058 310630 10/31/89 3.80 BERTELSON BROS. INC. CALENDARS 10- 4516 - 440 -44 310B30 10/27/89 22.49 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516- 781 -78 509936 4305 599.69 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 310632 10/30/89 11.25 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS CORE 10- 4540 - 646 -64 96687 4083 310632 10/27/89 6.84 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS KEYS 27- 4540 - 667 -66 96652 4277 310632 10/25/89 7.44 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS REPAIR DOOR 28- 4248 - 702 -70 96569 4138 310632 10/25/89 68.60 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS CORES /KEYS 40- 4540 - 802 -80 95939 3654 94.13 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 310854 10/30/89 468.96 BLUMBERG PHOTO CEILING MOUNT 10- 4540 - 520 -52 822980 3458 310854 10/27/89 185.18 BLUMBERG PHOTO GENERAL SUPPLIES 12- 4504 - 434 -43 822136 310854 10/27/89 73.28 BLUMBERG PHOTO CABLE TV 12- 4504 - 434 -43 B22992 727.42 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 310660 10/30/89 48.42 BORCHERT - INGERSOL GASKETS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 146507 3941 48.42 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 310862 .10/30/89 333.27 BOYUM EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 4231 3964 333.27 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 310677 10/30/89 1,247.25 BRAUN ENG TESTNG INC AC REMODEL 23- 1300 - 001 -00 18984 31OB77 10/25/89 149.50 BRAUN ENG TESTNG INC TESTING 60- 1300 - 278 -04 18475 310677 10/25/89 530.75 BRAUN ENG TESTNG INC TESTING 60- 1300 - 283 -04 18636 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 31OB77 10/25/89 351.50 310677 10/31/89 1,509.80 CHAPIN PUBLISHING 3,788.80 * * * * * ** FOR BIDS 310681 10/31/89 165.00 31OB81 10/31/89 25,197.27 CHAPIN PUBLISHING 25,362.27 * * * * * ** FOR BIDS 310001 10/25/89 321.26 310001 10/25/89 202.50 523.76 * 3100O2 10/25/89 10.00 10.00 * * * * * ** 310009 10/25/89 291.35 291.35 * 310C10 10/27/89 114.65 114.65 * * * * * ** 31OC17 10/25/89 5.66 31OC17 10/25/89 37.50 - 310C17 10/25/89 177.00 145.16 * * * * ** 31OC25 10/31/89 120.60 31OC25 10/30/89 31.50 31OC25 10/30/89 102.60 31OC25 10/30/89 91.00 31OC25 10/30/89 45.25 390.95 * * * * ** 31OC27 10/25/89 936.25 936.25 * * * * ** 31OC33 10/27/89 466.55 31OC33 10/27/89 27.10 31OC33 10/27/89 184.45 31OC33 10/27/89 27.10 31OC33 10/27/89 1,628.96 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION BRAUN ENG TESTNG INC TESTING BRAUN ENG TESTNG INC PRO ENG SERV BRW INC. BRW INC. C & S DISTRIBUTING C & S DISTRIBUTING C. F. ANDERSON PROF SERVICES PRO SERV ENG COST /GOODS SOLD COST /GOODS SOLD REPAIR BP EQUIP CARLSON PRINTING BUSINESS CARDS CARLSON STORE FIX CO GENERAL SUUPLIES CDP RENTAL CDP CREDIT CDP RENTAL CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO ADS FOR BIDS CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO ADS FOR BIDS CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO ADS FOR BIDS CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO ADS FOR BIDS CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO ADVERTISING CHEMLAWN CITY OF EDINA CITY OF EDINA CITY OF EDINA CITY OF EDINA CITY OF EDINA WEED CONTROL WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER /SEWER ,4Y 11 -06 -89 PAGE 12 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 60- 1300 - 284 -04 18475 60- 1300 - 289 -04 18408 27- 4201 - 664 -66 55585 60 -1300- 381 -01 55155 23- 4624- 613 -61 093579 3531 23- 4624 - 613 -61 093580 3531 10- 4248 - 440 -44 10- 4504 - 510 -51 46012 30- 4504 - 782 -78 34751 4303 10- 4504 - 540 -54 10- 4504 - 540 -54 10- 4540 - 540 -54 10- 4210 - 140 -14 105653 10- 4210 - 140 -14 105430 10- 4210 - 140 -14 105573 10- 4210 - 140 -14 105285 30- 4214 - 781 -78 105867 4310 10- 4201 - 643 -64 10- 4258 - 520 -52 10- 4258 - 540 -54 10- 4258 - 540 -54 10- 4258 - 646 -64 30- 4258 - 782 -78 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 31OC33 10/27/89 27.10 31OC33 10/27/89 27.10 CLANCY DRUG INC. PHOTO 2,388.36 * * * * ** PHOTO DUPPLIES 31OC37 10/25/89 23.98 31OC37 10/25/89 23.98 31OC37 10/25/89 23.98- ELECT CHANGER 23.98 31OC44 10/30/89 257.00 31OC44 10/30/89 27.50 284.50 31OC45 10/25/89 62.85 62.85 31OC65 10/30/89 445.00 31OC65 10/30/89 155.00 600.00 * * * * ** 31OC78 10/25/89 106.82 k k * * * 106.82 31OC85 10/25/89 23.50 23.50 * * * k * * 310D03 10/25/89 85.12 310D03 10/25/89 33.60 118.72 * * * k k * 310D05 10/25/89 49.50 k 49.50 * k k k* k 310D07 10/25/89 169.33 310D07 10/30/89 54.00 310D07 10/27/89 25.00 248.33 k * * * ** CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION CITY OF EDINA WATER CITY OF EDINA WATER CLANCY DRUG INC. PHOTO SUPPLIES CLANCY DRUG INC. PHOTO DUPPLIES CLANCY DRUG INC. PHOTO DUPPLIES COCA COLA BOTTLING COKE COCA COLA BOTTLING COST OF GOODS COLLINS ELECTRIC ELECT CHANGER (see also 310810) CONTACT MOBILE COMM CONTACT MOBILE COMM CRESCENT ELECTRIC CULLIGAN D & V SALES D & V SALES D. C. ANNIS SEWER D. C. HEY CO. D. C. HEY CO. D. C. HEY CO. 4w 4 RADIO RADIO SERV MISC ELEC SOFT WATER SERV GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES DRAIN CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS SERVICE CONTRACT 11 -06 -89 PAGE 13 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 4258 - 821 -82 50- 4258 - 861 -86 * ** -CKS 10- 4508 - 627 -62 10- 4508 - 627 -62 10- 4508 - 627 -62 * ** -CKS 27- 4624 - 663 -66 28- 4624 - 703 -70 60- 1300 - 009 -17 A5902 * ** -CKS 10- 4226 - 301 -30 12693 3598 10- 4504 - 301 -30 12695 3945 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 3577 * ** -CKS 10- 4200 - 482 -48 * ** -CKS 30- 4504 - 782 -78 39407 4132 30- 4504 - 782 -78 39493 4170 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 1668 3831 * ** -CKS 23- 4248 - 612 -61 134130 23- 4248 - 612 -61 135872 3869 30- 4288 - 781 -78 137600 4304 * ** -CKS 11 -06 -89 PAGE 14 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4248 - 460 -46 6785 3658 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 600 -60 10- 4208 - 600 -60 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 510 -51 920935 4041 10- 4504 - 600 -60 920935 4041 * ** -CKS 40- 4518 - 803280 6905 1045 40- 4552- 900 -80 6695 40- 4552 - 900 -90 7125 1045 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 647 -64 92383 3539 10- 4504 - 301 -30 91056 3367 10- 4504 - 560 -56 91754 3196 * ** -CKS 30- 4288 - 782 -78 P93789 4167 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 520 -52 4279 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 500 -50 * ** -CKS 10- 4901 - 420 -42 40837 25- 4924 - 520 -52 41627 25- 4924 - 520 -52 41626 4124 * ** -CKS 40- 4620 - 805 -80 130435 3910 v � 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 31OD21 10/25/89 212.50 DANNYS CONSTR. CO. CRANE RENTAL 212.50 * * * * ** 31OD33 10/25/89 330.75 DAVIS- EUGENE WEED CONTROL 31OD33 10/25/89 54.00 DAVIS- EUGENE MILEAGE 384.75 * * * * ** 31OD85 10/25/89 36.84 DUFFEY PAPER CO. TAGBOARD 31OD85 10/25/89 36.84 DUFFEY PAPER CO. TAGBOARD 73.68 * * * * ** 310E02 10/27/89 267.45 E KRAEMER & SONS INC FILL MATERIAL 31OE02 10/25/89 264.44 E KRAEMER & SONS INC HAULING 31OE02 10/27/89 262.42 E KRAEMER & SONS INC FILL MATERIAL 794.31 * * * * ** 310E14 10/31/89 2,453.76 EARL F. ANDERSON SERVICES 310E14 10/30/89 419.76 EARL F. ANDERSON PAINT 31OE14 10/25/89 160.80 EARL F. ANDERSON SIGNS 3,034.32 * ** * * ** 310E20 10/25/89 85.00 ECOLAB PEST ELIM. CONTRACT SERV 85.00 * * * * * ** 31OE71 10/30/89 71.07 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY SUPPLIES 71.07 * * * * * ** 31OE75 10/30/89 300.00 EMPLOYEES CLUB SUPPLIES 300.00 * * * * * ** 31OF02 10/27/89 18.60 FACILITY SYSTEMS REMODELING 31OF02 10/25/89 35.00 FACILITY SYSTEMS REMODELING 31OF02 10/25/89 212.37 FACILITY SYSTEMS REMODELING 265.97 * * * * ** 31OF11 10/25/89 324.80 FEED RITE CONTROL H2O TREAT EQUIP 11 -06 -89 PAGE 14 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4248 - 460 -46 6785 3658 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 600 -60 10- 4208 - 600 -60 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 510 -51 920935 4041 10- 4504 - 600 -60 920935 4041 * ** -CKS 40- 4518 - 803280 6905 1045 40- 4552- 900 -80 6695 40- 4552 - 900 -90 7125 1045 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 647 -64 92383 3539 10- 4504 - 301 -30 91056 3367 10- 4504 - 560 -56 91754 3196 * ** -CKS 30- 4288 - 782 -78 P93789 4167 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 520 -52 4279 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 500 -50 * ** -CKS 10- 4901 - 420 -42 40837 25- 4924 - 520 -52 41627 25- 4924 - 520 -52 41626 4124 * ** -CKS 40- 4620 - 805 -80 130435 3910 1989 CITY OF EDINA RADIO CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 31OF11 10/30/89 233.00 31OF11 10/25/89 15.00 31OF11 10/25/89 2,091.81 310F11 10/30/89 2,223.84 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS 4,888.45 * * * * * ** 10- 4294 - 560 -56 55509 31OF26 10/25/89 4,949.90 RADIO 10- 4294 - 560 -56 4,949.90 * * * * * ** COMMUNICATIONS RADIO 31OF37 10/30/89 75.00 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS 75.00 * * * * * ** 10- 4504 - 440 -44 56300 31OF64 10/30/89 26.00 26.00 * * * * * ** 31OG15 10/25/89 86.00 86.00 * * * * * ** 31OG22 10/27/89 192.08 192.08 * * * * * ** 31OG24 10/25/89 166.60 31OG24 10/27/89 56.70 31OG24 10/25/89 35.30 31OG24 10/25/89 97.70 31OG24 10/25/89 41.00 31OG24 10/27/89 97.70 31OG24 10/27/89 67.00 562.00 * * * * * ** 31OG26 10/31/89 369.85 369.85 * 310G32 10/31/89 472.50 31OG32 10/30/89 377.20 31OG32 10/25/89 75.00 31OG32 10/25/89 75.00 31OG32 10/30/89 117.50 31OG32 10/30/89 400.00 1,944.78 1,517.20* CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION FEED RITE CONTROL TREATMENT EQUIP FEED RITE CONTROL DEMURRAGE CHG FEED RITE CONTROL H2O TREAT CHEM FEED RITE CONTROL CHEMICALS 11 -06 -89 PAGE 15 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 40- 4622 - 805 -80 130873 3996 40- 4622 - 805 -80 71307 1670 40- 4622 - 805 -80 130381 1670 40- 4622 - 805 -80 130887 1670 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL SEWER RODS /SAW 40- 4540 - 801 -80 3195 3562 FLOYD LOCK & SAFE CO PARTS FRED VOGT & CO. REFUND GEM TAP SERV BEERLINE CLEAN GENERAL BINDING LAMINATING SUPPLIES 10- 4620 - 560 -56 12430 3994 10- 3130 - 000 -00 27- 4630 - 663 -66 10- 4504 - 520 -52 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS RADIO SERV 10- 4248 - 440 -44 55237 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS RADIO SERVICE 10- 4248 - 440 -44 56426 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS ANTENNA GOPHER 10- 4294 - 560 -56 55508 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS REPAIR RADIO 10- 4294 - 560 -56 55509 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS REPAIR RADIO 10- 4294 - 560 -56 55507 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS RADIO REPAIR 10- 4294 - 560 -56 55854 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS RADIO BATTERY 10- 4504 - 440 -44 56300 GENERAL OFFICE PROD REPLACE SAFE GOPHER STATE 1 CALL GENERAL SUPPLIES GOPHER STATE 1 CALL LOCATION REQUEST GOPHER STATE 1 CALL GENERAL SUPPLIES GOPHER STATE 1 CALL GENERAL SUPPLIES GOPHER STATE 1 CALL LOCATION REQUEST GOPHER STATE 1 CALL LOCATION REQUEST 28- 4504 - 702 -70 3303 40- 4504 - 801 -80 10- 4504 - 301 -30 10- 4504 - 301 -30 10- 4504 - 646 -64 40- 4504 - 803 -80 288117 40- 4504 - 803 -80 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS '40 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -06 -89 PAGE 16 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * * * * ** * ** -CKS 310G44 10/25/89 50.00 GLEN SIPE PIANO SERV CONTRACT SERV 30- 4288 - 782 -78 891019 4168 50.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 310G52 10/25/89 35.72 GOODIN CO. HARDWARE 10- 4540 - 646 -64 4120 35.72 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 310G68 10/30/89 133.01 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. ELEC PARTS 10- 4540 - 390 -30 961286 4090 31OG68 10/30/89 86.75 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 952712 3947 310G68 10/25/89 215.74 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. MISC PARTS 10- 4540- 520 -52 947747 3817 310G68 10/30/89 197.91 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. FUSE 40- 4540 - 801 -80 959738 4085 310G68 10/25/89 145.00- GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. CREDIT 40- 4540 - 806 -80 945097 3590 488.41 * * * * ** * ** -CKS �olnrovcv�10"25"89 ¢72 59 472.59 GRIGGS GOOPER & GO. GENERAL 5A4-$$i-fB * * * * ** * ** -CKS 310G96 10/30/89 24.75 GUY SPEAKER CO. BLUE PENS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 33246 4103 24.75 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 310H03 10/31/89 44.00 HOLMSTEN ICE RINKS CONTRACT REPAIRS 30- 4248 - 782 -78 1353 4337 44.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 310H21 10/25/89 66.27 HARMON GLASS DOOR GLASS 10-4248 - 560 -56 189308 3798 66.27 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 310H33 10/31/89 36.90 HENN CTY SHERIFF EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274 - 420 -42 310H33 10/27/89 267.48 HENN CTY SHERIFF WORKHOUSE /JAIL 10- 4286 - 220 -22 304.38 310H34 10/31/89 162.50 HENN COUNTY TREAS. ROOM /BOARD 10- 4286 - 220 -22 20836 310H34 10/27/89 4,706.56 HENN COUNTY TREAS. ROOM BOARD 10- 4286 - 220 -22 20580 310H34 10/31/89 75.75 HENN COUNTY TREAS. ROOM /BOARD 10- 4286 - 220 -22 20829 310H34 10/27/89 2,799.27 HENN COUNTY TREAS. WORKHOUSE /JAIL 10- 4286 - 220 -22 20617 7,744.08 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 310H74 10/27/89 21.20 HOOTEN CLEANERS LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 420 -42 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -06 -89 PAGE 17 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 21.20 * k k k k k * ** -CKS 31OH85 10/30/89 42.50 HUMPHREY RADIATOR CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 4001 31OH85 10/30/89 29.50 HUMPHREY RADIATOR REPIAR RADIATOR 10- 4540 - 560 -56 3966 72.00 * kk *kkk * ** -CKS 310I05 10/27/89 63.00 I C M A SUBSCRIPTION 10- 4204 - 140 -14 201722 4278 63.00 * *kkk ** * ** -CKS 310I09 10/25/89 90.00 IAAO DUES 10- 4204 - 200 -20 90.00 * kkkkk k * ** -CKS 310I23 10/25/89 8.56 INDELCO CORP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 45534 3946 310I23 10/25/89 25.77 INDELCO CORP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 45329 3820 310I23 10/30/89 21.20 INDELCO CORP IRRIGATION PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 45682 3989 55.53 * kkkkk * ** -CKS 310I59 10/27/89 186.45 INTERIOR COM SYS. TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 510 -51 25130 310I59 10/25/89 109.20 INTERIOR COM SYS. REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 702 -70 025142 4139 295.65 * kkkkk * ** -CKS 310I61 10/25/89 1,776.77 INTERSTATE TRANS REPAIR 10- 4248 - 560 -56 120655 3668 310I61 10/25/89 46.80 INTERSTATE REPAIR WORK 10- 4540 - 560 -56 120633 4003 1,823.57 * *kkkkk * ** -CKS 310J08 10/25/89 60.00 J & F REDDY RENTS RENTAL 27- 4540 - 666 -66 56748 2727 60.00 * kkk * *k * ** -CKS 31OJ23 10/31/89 18.98 JR JOHNSON SUP GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 783 -78 41130 3787 18.98 * kkkkkk * ** -CKS 31OJ27 10/25/89 79.60 JERRYS FOODS SUPPLIES 10- 4202 - 281 -28 31OJ27 10/30/89 26.26 JERRYS FOODS GENERAL SUPPLIES 23- 4504 - 611 -61 31OJ27 10/27/89 8.20 JERRYS FOODS GENERAL SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 665 -66 114.06 kkkkkk * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 31OJ35 10/25/89 31OJ35 10/30/89 * * * * ** 31OJ41 10/30/89 31OJ41 10/30/89 * * * * ** 31OJ74 10/25/89 31OJ74 10/25/89 31OJ74 10/31/89 * * * * ** 31OK05 10/25/89 31OK05 10/25/89 31OK05 10/25/89 31OK05 10/25/89 31OK05 10/25/89 * * * * ** 31OK09 10/30/89 * * * * ** 31OK35 10/25/89 31OK35 10/25/89 31OK35 10/25/89 31OK35 10/27/89 31OK35 10/25/89 31OK35 10/25/89 31OK35 10/25/89 31OK35 10/25/89 31OK35 10/25/89 31OK35 10/30/89 31OK35 10/25/89 31OK35 10/27/89 31OK35 10/25/89 31OK35 10/25/89 * * * * ** 31OK38 10/25/89 31OK38 10/30/89 AMOUNT 19.72 214.76 234.48 * 369.74 395.74 765.48 * 67.14 174.50 26.05 267.69 * 121.04- 478.00 121.04 121.04 251.55 850.59 * 47.20 47.20 * 38.45 173.62 1.74- 29.20 23.91 34.37 16.98 39.75 30.75 47.71 323.89 104.02 87.56 31.54 980.01 56.09 61.92 118.01 'f i CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION JERRYS PRINTING INSPECTION FORMS JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING JIM HATCH SALES JIM HATCH SALES JUSTUS LUMBER JUSTUS LUMBER JUSTUS LUMBER K & K SALES K & K SALES K & K SALES K & K SALES K & K SALES TOOLS TOOLS LUMBER LUMBER REPAIR PARTS DOOR CLOSER HOLLOW METAL DOOR DOOR CLOSER DOOR CLOSER HINGES /FRAME KAMAN BEARING & SPLY REPAIR PARTS KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNUTSON -JIM KNUTSON -JIM SUPPLIES SUPPLIES CREDIT SIDING MISC HARDWARE MISC HARDWARE LUMBER LUMBER LUMBER LUMBER LUMBER GENERAL SUPPLIES HEATERS REPAI PARTS CONFERENCE MILEAGE 11 -06 -89 PAGE 18 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4600- 480 -48 7559 23- 4600 - 611 -61 7799 4147 10- 4580 - 301 -30 9848 3939 10- 4580 - 301 -30 9847 3944 10- 4528 - 314 -30 9431 3793 10- 4528 - 314 -30 7320 3568 27- 4540 - 669 -66 18892 3864 10- 4540 - 390 -30 43468 3488 10- 4540 - 390 -30 43513 3261 10- 4540 - 390 -30 43468 3488 10- 4540 - 390 -30 43468 3488 40- 4540 - 803 -80 43442 3561 10- 4540 - 560 -56 3912 10- 4504 - 301 -30 532091 3924 10- 4504 - 325 -30 509197 3819 10- 4504 - 646 -64 496130 10- 4528 - 314 -30 496699 4004 10- 4540 - 646 -64 471882 4118 10- 4540 - 646 -64 495526 4005 10- 4604 - 646 -64 496573 3990 10- 4604 - 646 -64 496801 3988 10- 4604 - 646 -64 496129 3908 27- 4604 - 662 -66 495740 4160 27- 4604- 664 -66 496119 3956 28- 4504 - 702 -70 495540 4134 40- 4504- 802 -80 496135 3948 40- 4540- 802 -80 508568 3810 10- 4202 - 160 -16 10- 4208 - 160 -16 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS ' � 1 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT RRRR RIY 310K51 10/25/89 90.00 PARTS LAWSON 90.00 * R R R R R R 3722 LAWSON 310K57 10/27/89 2,704.65 310K57 10/30/89 4,588.15 LAWSON 7,292.80 * R *R * ** LAWSON 310K63 10/31/89 170.50 LOGIS 170.50 * R R R R R R 310L08 10/30/89 86.71 DATA PROCESSING 86.71 * R * * * *R DATA PROCESSING 310L10 10/25/89 227.92 R R R R R R LOGIS 227.92 * 310L22 10/30/89 130.00 DATA 130.00 * R9[ R RRR DATA 310L28 10/25/89 96.81 310L28 10/25/89 79.52 310L28 10/25/89 547.83 310L28 10/25/89 218.60 310L28 10/25/89 564.40 310L28 10/25/89 332.60 1,839.76 R R R R R R 310L60 10/27/89 3,012.97 310L60 10/27/89 863.39 310L60 10/27/89 3,944.03 310L60 10/27/89 2,092.98 310L60 10/27/89 326.73 310L60 10/27/89 326.73 310L60 10/27/89 329.73 - 310L60 10/27/89 329.73 310L60 10/27/89 326.74 10,893.57 * R R R R R 1 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR KREMER SPRG & ALGN KUETHER DIST. CO. KUETHER DIST. CO. KUSTOM ELECTRONICS LAKE STATE EQUIP. LAKELAND ENGINEERING ITEM DESCRIPTION SPRINGS BEER BEER LEASE PAYMENT REPAIR PARTS REAPIR PARTS LANDSCAPE & TURF FERTILIZER LAWSON PRODUCTS ELEC PARTS LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 3722 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 3724 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS LAWSON PRODUCTS BOLTS LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS LOGIS DATA PROCESSING LOGIS DATA PROCESSING LOGIS DATA PROCESSING LOGIS DATA PROCESSING LOGIS DATA PROCESSING LOGIS DATA PROCESING LOGIS DATA PROCESSING LOGIS DATA PROCESSING LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 11 -06 -89 PAGE 19 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 16982 3917 * ** -CKS 50- 4630 - 822 -82 50- 4630 - 842 -84 * ** -CKS 10- 4901 - 420 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 P59101 4198 * ** -CKS 40- 4540 - 805 -80 3799 * ** -CKS 27- 4588 - 664 -66 4196 4180 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 322 -30 3723 10- 4504- 325 -30 2237 10- 4540 - 560 -56 3381 10- 4642 - 301 -30 3722 40- 4540 - 801 -80 3510 40- 4540 - 803 -80 3724 * ** -CKS 10- 4233 - 160 -16 10- 4233 - 200 -20 10- 4233 - 420 -42 40- 4233 - 800 -80 50- 4233 - 820 -82 50- 4233 - 840 -84 50- 4233 - 840 -84 50- 4233 - 840 -84 50- 4233 - 860 -86 V 40 * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -06 -89 PAGE 20 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 310L66 10/25/89 19.05 LONG LAKE FORD TRACT CABLE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 94460 3796 19.05 k k* k k k * ** -CKS 310L80 10/25/89 68.82 LYNDALE GARDEN CTR GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504- 782 -78 19686 4054 310L80 10/25/89 63.68 LYNDALE GARDEN CTR GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 19693 4056 132.50 * kkkkkk * ** -CKS 310L82 10/25/89 25.67 LYNDALE HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 30-4504- 782 -78 262850 4148 25.67 * kkkkk k * ** -CKS 310M02 10/25/89 160.44 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. MOUNT 10- 4536 - 310 -30 99146 4105 310M02 10/25/89 373.34 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. DIRT SHOE RUNNER 10- 4536 - 310 -30 99205 3803 533.78 * , kkkkkk * ** -CKS 310M05 10/25/89 22.00 MAMA MEETING EXP 10- 4206 - 140 -14' 22.00 * * k * k k k * ** -CKS 310M07 10/25/89 2,569.35 MARK VII SALES BEER 50- 4630 - 822 -82 2,569.35 * kkkkk * ** -CKS 310M11 10/27/89 225.00 MARTIN - MCALLISTER PRO SERVICES 10- 4201 - 420 -42 1673 225.00 kkkkk k * ** -CKS 310M16 10/25/89 220.00 MCCAREN DESIGNS TREES /FLOWERS /SHRUBS 30- 4660 - 782 -78 4039 310M16 10/27/89 151.81 MCCAREN DESIGNS TREES /PLANTS.SHRUBS 30- 4660 - 783 -78 1786 4225 371.81 * kkkkkk * ** -CKS 310M18 10/25/89 75.60 MCGARVEY COFFEE COFFEE 10- 4504 - 510 -51 220393 4157 75.60 * kkkkkk * ** -CKS 310M23 10/25/89 300.00 MARKETING FACTORS PRO SERV 50- 4201 - 820 -82 310M23 10/25/89 300.00 MARKETING FACTORS PRO SERV 50- 4201 - 840 -84 310M23 10/25/89 300.00 MARKETING FACTORS PRO SERV 50- 4201 - 860 -86 900.00 kkkkkk * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -06 -89 PAGE 21 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 31OM25 31OM25 10/25/89 10/25/89 33.33 15.19 MED OXYGEN & EQUIP MED OXYGEN & EQUIP OXYGEN OXYGEN 10- 4510 - 440 -44 48.52 10- 4540 - 440 -44 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 3 31OM27 31OM27 10/31/89 10/25/89 150.30 448.50 MERIT SUPPLY KENNEL SERV 10- 4278 420 -42 22881 4243 31OM27 10/25/89 422.65 MERIT SUPPLY MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 390 -30 10- 4504 - 390 -30 22657 22670 3741 31OM27 31OM27 10/25/89 10/25/89 433.90 498.40 MERIT SUPPLY MERIT SUPPLY CLEANER /SPRAY 10- 4504 - 560 -56 22686 3750 3802 31OM27 10/25/89 135.45 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES POLYLINERS 10- 4504 - 645 -64 22775 3982 31OM27 31OM27 10/30/89 10/30/89 380.00 MERIT SUPPLY ICE MELT 10- 4512 - 540 -54 10- 4520 - 301 -30 22657 22782 3741 4002 31OM27 10/25/89 403.90 467.50 MERIT SUPPLY MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 22815 4088 31OM27 31OM27 10/25/89 10/31/89 4,530.90 133.58 MERIT SUPPLY PRESSURE WASHER 10- 4620 - 560 -56 10- 4901 - 560 -56 22713 22794 3833 3715 31OM27 10/31/89 138.00 MERIT SUPPLY MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 663 -66 22797 31OM27 31OM27 10/25/89 10/25/89 232.20 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 663 -66 28- 4512 - 702 -70 22836 22732 3892 3904 31OM27 10/25/89 475.60 480.00 MERIT SUPPLY MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 22783 4125 310M27' 31OM27 10/30/89 10/25/89 414.00 MERIT SUPPLY WYPALLS 30- 4504 - 782 -78 40- 4504 - 801 -80 22731 22756 3763 3965 31OM27 10/25/89 438.60 592.00 MERIT SUPPLY MERIT SUPPLY WYPALLS CARPETING 40- 4504 - 801 -80 22704 3826 10, 775.48* -i6--827 . e l * 60- 1300 - 005 -20 22793 4081 31OM29 10/25/89- : -' "` "A 51.53* MESSERLI & KRAMER AMBULANCE COLLECT 10- 3180 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS 31OM35 10/25/89 220,257.78 METRO WASTE CONTROL SEWER CHARGE 40- 4312 - 812 -80 7259 220,257.78 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 31OM37 10/27/89 28.00 MGA FEES 27- 3470 - 661 -66 4217 28.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 31OM42 31OM42 10/27/89 10/25/89 117.46 121.78 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. SERVICES BLACKTOP 10- 4201 - 647 -64 2721 31OM42 31OM42 10/27/89 63.02 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524- 301 -30 10- 4524 - 301 -30 2659 2795 31OM42 10/27/89 10/25/89 64.43 342.11 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 301 -30 2721 31OM42 31OM42 10/27/89 46.64 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 380 -30 27- 4524 - 664 -66 2659 2795 31OM42 10/27/89 10/27/89 160.10 81.49 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP CASTINGS 40- 4524 - 803 -80 2795 997.03 40- 4552 - 900 -80 2721 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 31OM46 31OM46 10/30/89 10/31/89 122.83 106.68 METZ BAKING CO METZ BAKING CO BREAD 27- 4624 - 663 -66 31OM46 10/25/89 175.47 METZ BAKING CO BREAD BREAD 27- 4624 - 663 -66 27- 4624 - 663 -66 0 to 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 404.98 * * * * ** 31OM57 31OM58 31OM58 * * * * ** 31OM68 31OM68 31OM68 31OM68 31OM68 31OM68 31OM68 310M68 31OM69 31OM69 31OM69 31OM70 31OM70 31OM70 * * * * ** 31OM76 * * * * ** 31OM80 31OM80 31OM80 31OM80 31OM80 31OM80 31OM80 31OM80 31OM81 31OM81 310M81 31OM81 t) 11 -06 -89 PAGE 22 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10/25/89 1,591.97 MILLER- DUNWIDDIE ARCH SEVRV 60- 1300 - 015 -20 8389 4164 1,591.97 10/27/89 402.47 - 3.98- -38- MILLIPORE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 482 -48 103562 3870 10/27/89 451.01 MILLIPORE LAB SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 482 -48 103561 3871 ee ear is 853.48* 10/30/89 55.96 MN. CELLULAR TEL. PHONE 10- 4204 - 100 -10 10/30/89 260.11 MN. CELLULAR TEL. PHONE 10- 4204 - 140 -14 807727 10/31/89 68.60 MN. CELLULAR TEL. EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 10/31/89 8.25 MN. CELLULAR TEL. EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 10/31/89 16.50 MN. CELLULAR TEL. EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 10/31/89 77.55 MN. CELLULAR TEL. EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 10/31/89 30.90 MN. CELLULAR TEL. EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 10/31/89 7.35 MN. CELLULAR TEL. EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 525.22 * 10/30/89 164.85 MCC /MIDWEST CRAFT SUPPLIES 23- 4588- 311 -61 27483 4145 10/30/89 245.25 MCC /MIDWEST COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 27483 4145 10/25/89 215.18 MCC /MIDWEST COST /GOODS SOLD 23 -4624- 613 -61 27195 3631 625.28 * 10/25/89 562.50 MN. CONWAY FIRE EXT 10- 4248 - 560 -56 136725 3371 10/27/89 29.95 MN. CONWAY SUSPENDERS 10- 4574 - 440 -44 13453 3845 10/25/89 128.20 MN. CONWAY GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504- 782 -78 3961 720.65 * 10/30/89 143.11 MN. GLOVE GLOVES 10- 4642- 301 -30 36083 3932 143.11 * 10/25/89 363.33 MN SUBURBAN NEWS OFFICIAL PUB 10- 4210 - 140 -14 10/25/89 10.74 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ADS FOR BIDS 10- 4210 - 140 -14 10/25/89 27.92 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ADS FOR BIDS 10- 4210 - 140 -14 10/25/89 28.42 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ADS FOR BIDS 10- 4210 - 140 -14 10/30/89 16.11 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ADS FOR BIDS 10- 4210 - 140 -14 85816 10/25/89 244.14 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ADS 10- 4210 - 140 -14 10/30/89 39.72 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ADS FOR BIDS 10- 4210 - 140 -14 10/30/89 12.35 MN SUBURBAN NEWS OFFICIAL PUBLICATION 10- 4210 - 140 -14 0089 742.73 10/27/89 2,925.00 MN. TORO INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 664 -66 786858 3400 10/27/89 160.07 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 789466 4142 10/27/89 109.79 MN. TORO INC. IRRIGATION PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 786964 3874 10/27/89 109.92 MN. TORO INC. IRRIGATION PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 788107 3325 3,304.78 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA VENDOR CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT *kkkkk EXPANSION JOINT MONARCH MARKETING 310M85 10/25/89 50.75 MPLS SEWER & WATER SERV LINE REPAIR 50.75 * k k k k k k MTS NW SOUND GENERAL SUPPLIES 310M90 10/25/89 198.75 GENERAL SUPPLIES MUZAK 198.75 * *kkk *k ADVERTISING NAPA AUTO PARTS 310M92 10/27/89 39.30 NATL GUARDIAN SYS. ALARM SERV 39.30 * kkk * k k NATL GUARDIAN SYS. ALARM SERVICES 310M97 10/25/89 5,973.70 5,973.70 * k k k k k k 310NO3 10/25/89 480.00 480.00 * k k k k k k 310N07 10/27/89 212.19 310N07 10/27/89 212.19 424.38 * kkkkkk 310N11 10/27/89 32.95 310N11 10/25/89 274.85 307.80 * kkkkkk 310N13 10/31/89 43.45 310N13 10/31/89 43.45 86.90 * k k k k k k 310N21 10/25/89 134.92 310N21 10/30/89 83.10 218.02 * 310N22 10/25/89 146.72 310N22 10/30/89 551.99 310N22 10/31/89 233.63 932.34 * kkkkkk CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION MN. WANNER WELD POLE MODEL STONE CO. EXPANSION JOINT MONARCH MARKETING MONARCH REPAIR MPLS FINANCE DEPT. WATER MPLS SEWER & WATER SERV LINE REPAIR MTS NW SOUND GENERAL SUPPLIES MTS NW SOUND GENERAL SUPPLIES MURRAY SANDLER SUP GENERAL SUPPLIES MURRAY SANDLER SUP GENERAL SUPPLIES MUZAK ADVERTISING MUZAK ADVERTISING NAPA AUTO PARTS REPAIR PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS HOSE END NATL GUARDIAN SYS. ALARM SERV NATL GUARDIAN SYS. ALARM CONRACT NATL GUARDIAN SYS. ALARM SERVICES 11 -06 -89 PAGE 23 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 4248 - 322 -30 073366 * ** -CKS 10- 4528 - 314 -30 194882 3808 * ** -CKS 50- 4516 - 860 -86 194527 * ** -CKS 40- 4640 - 803 -80 * ** -CKS 40- 4248 - 801 -80 20212 4098 * ** -CKS 30- 4504 - 782 -78 78053 4219 30- 4504 - 782 -78 78054 4218 * ** -CKS 28- 4504 - 702 -70 7787 28- 4504 - 702 -70 6987 3881 * ** -CKS 50- 4214 - 822 -82 108911 50- 4214 - 862 -86 108911 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 533815 3943 10- 4620 - 560 -56 524638 4100 23- 4304 - 612 -61 144711 27- 4304 - 662 -66 50- 4304 - 841 -84 155049 4w * ** -CKS CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION NEBCO DISTRIBUTING POPCORN NO STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS NO STAR TURF MOWER PARTS NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST /GOODS SOLD 1989 CITY OF EDINA SOLD CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 31ON31 10/27/89 10.95 OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING 10.95 * * * * * ** PRINTING 31ON48 10/25/89 3.77 31ON48 10/27/89 21.69 BILL OLSON DIRT 25.46 * * * * * ** CONTRACT SERV 165047 31ON72 10/27/89 2,680.09 PARK NIC MED CTR SHOTS 2,680.09 * * * * * ** 31ON82 10/25/89 29.81 31ON82 10/25/89 200.53 31ON82 10/30/89 125.03 30326 4009 355.37 * * * * ** 30326 4009 310024 10/31/89 416.00 310024 10/31/89 416.00 310024 10/31/89 416.00- 10- 4518- 365 -30 416.00 * * * * ** 40- 4504 - 803 -80 310036 10/30/89 76.00 76.00 310037 10/25/89 200.00 310037 10/25/89 167.50 * ** -CKS 367.50 * * * * ** 310050 10/25/89 777.00 777.00 **R * *t 310P08 10/25/89 65.25 65.25 * * * * ** 31OP11 10/27/89 47.10 31OP11 10/25/89 8.00 * * * * ** 55.10 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION NEBCO DISTRIBUTING POPCORN NO STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS NO STAR TURF MOWER PARTS NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST /GOODS SOLD NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST /GOODS SOLD NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST /GOODS SOLD OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING OLSON CHAIN & CABLE NYLON TIE DOWN BILL OLSON DIRT * ** -CKS BILL OLSON DIRT 3785 OWENS SERVICE CO CONTRACT SERV 165047 PAPER WAREHOUSE SUPPLIES 23- 4624 - 613 -61 PARK NIC MED CTR SHOTS PARK NIC MED CTR SHOT .:J 11 -06 -89 PAGE 24 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 28- 4624 - 703 -70 013704 9746 10- 4504 - 627 -62 11030 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 420 -42 10- 4212 - 510 -51 1 � ' * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 174951 3863 27- 4540 - 664 -66 174952 3863 * ** -CKS 10- 4616- 560 -56 * ** -CKS 23- 4624 - 613 -61 164709 3785 23- 4624 - 613 -61 165047 3867 23- 4624 - 613 -61 165470 4053 * ** -CKS 10- 4600 - 420 -42 30326 4009 10- 4600 - 420 -42 30326 4009 10- 4600 - 420 -42 30326 4009 * ** -CKS 10- 4580 - 646 -64 93117 4113 10- 4518- 365 -30 1040 40- 4504 - 803 -80 1040 * ** -CKS 30- 4288 - 782 -78 41323 3960 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 627 -62 11030 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 420 -42 10- 4212 - 510 -51 1 � ' * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA VENDOR CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 31OP24 10/30/89 64.34 CABLE PIP PRINTING 64.34 * * * ** ** PRINTING PRINTERS SERV INC 31OP44 10/25/89 345.00 31OP44 10/25/89 110.60 FREEZER QUICK SERV BATTERY 455.60 * * * * * ** FILTERS QUICK SERV BATTERY 31OP48 10/25/89 15.90 31OP48 10/27/89 26.20 REPAIR AUGER 42.10 * * * * * ** 31OP78 10/25/89 330.00 330.00 * * * * * ** 31OP80 10/25/89 41.76 41.76 * * * * * ** 31OP84 10/25/89 136.33 136.33 * * * * * ** 310009 10/30/89 161.73 161.73 * * * * * ** 310Q20 10/30/89 50.34 31OQ20 10/30/89 100.08 31OQ20 10/30/89 61.15 211.57 * * * * * ** 31OQ22 10/31/89 26.45 31OQ22 10/31/89 136.28 162.73 * * * * * ** 31OR01 10/25/89 547.55 547.55 * * * * * ** CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION PBE MARKER LIGHT PHYSIO CONTROL MAINT AGREEMENT PHYSIO CONTROL CABLE PIP PRINTING PRINTING PIP PRINTING PRINTING PRINTERS SERV INC BLADES PRIOR LAKE AGG. GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO INSTANT PRINT GENERAL SUPPLIES QUALITY REFRIG FREEZER QUICK SERV BATTERY FILTERS QUICK SERV BATTERY FILTERS QUICK SERV BATTERY FILTERS QUIK PRINT PRINTING QUIK PRINT PRINTING R & R SPECIALTIES REPAIR AUGER 11 -06 -89 PAGE 25 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4620 - 560 -56 428721 3933 * ** -CKS 10- 4274 - 440 -44 D17979 1317 10- 4510 - 440 -44 A02107 3847 * ** -CKS 30- 4600 - 781 -78 5706 4169' 30- 4600 - 781 -78 5728 4224 * ** -CKS 28- 4274 - 704 -70 42758 4043 * ** -CKS 10 -4504- 301 -30 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 490 -49 28838 3958 * ** -CKS 27- 4248 - 663 -66 66287 4306 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 33688 3972 10- 4540 - 560 -56 33410 3830 10- 4620 - 560 -56 33680 3918 * ** -CKS 28- 4600 - 701 -70 035408 4276 28- 4600 - 701 -70 035452 4307 * ** -CKS 28- 4248 - 704 -70 11205 3901 * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA 10- 4262 - 301 -30 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 31OR12 10/27/89 15.82 REM SUPPLIES 15.82 * k k k k k k 0134 4314 31OR21 10/25/89 81.55 31OR21 10/25/89 76.45 158.00 * 31OR22 10/30/89 497.50 31OR22 10/30/89 366.75 k k k k k k REPAIR WORKS 864.25 * 31OR25 10/30/89 15.00 31OR25 10/30/89 145.00 31OR25 10/30/89 145.00- 15.00 k k k k k k 31OR49 10/31/89 44.00 31OR49 10/25/89 1.00 31OR49 10/27/89 67.50 - 310R49 10/27/89 74.97 52.47 kkkkkk 31OR53 10/25/89 43.20 43.20 k k k k k k 31OR63 10/25/89 1,000.00 31OR63 10/25/89 535.00 1,535.00 kkkkkk 310S08 10/27/89 109.00 310S08 10/25/89 67.42 176.42 310S09 10/25/89 75.71 75.71 31OS10 10/25/89 921.24 921.24 k k k k k k 310S15 10/25/89 66.50 ti' CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION RADIO SHACK TELEPHONE JACK 11 -06 -89 PAGE 26 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4540 - 540 -54 * ** -CKS RED WING SHOES UNIFORM ALLAWANCE 10- 4262 - 301 -30 97246 RED WING SHOES UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10- 4262 - 560 -56 97246 REM SUPPLIES GENRAL SUPPLIES 30- 4540 - 782 -78 0134 4314 REM SUPPLIES TREES /SHRUBS /FLOWERS 30- 4558- 783 -78 0132 4318 * ** -CKS RENTAL EQUIP & SALES REPAIR WORK 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10703 4108 RENTAL EQUIP & SALES REPAIR WORKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10703 4108 RENTAL EQUIP & SALES REPAIR WORK 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10703 4108 ROAD RESCUE ROAD RESCUE ROAD RESCUE ROAD RESCUE ROBERT B. HILL ROGERS PAINTING ROGERS PAINTING STRETCHER STRAPS RED LENS /VEHICLE CREDIT WHELEN FLASH SALT PAINT HOCKEY RINK PAINT HOCKEY RINK SAYLORS SOFTWARE 1ST SOFTWARE EB SAYLORS SOFTWARE 1ST GENERAL SUPPLIES SCHAFER EQUIP CO TOOLS SUBURBAN TIRE & AUTO TIRE SEARS REPAIRS * ** -CKS 10- 4510 - 440 -44 100254 3243 10- 4540 - 560 -56 90371 3732 10- 4901 - 440 -44 001697 10- 4901 - 440 -44 100196 3838 * ** -CKS 10- 4504- 440 -44 2817 1320 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 646 -64 3491 10- 4201 - 646 -64 **x-CKS 10- 4504 - 510 -51 29844 4156 10- 4504- 510 -51 29302 10- 4580 - 301 -30 147904 3520 10- 4616 - 560 -56 3381 3967 10- 4248 - 440 -44 989066 3248 r �y • * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT SOUTHDALE FORD LATCH 66.50 * kkkkk k REPAI RPARTS 310527 10/31/89 256.35 SOUTHDALE FORD BOOSTER 256.35 * kkkkk k 310534 10/27/89 40.50 310534 10/25/89 120.33 310534 10/25/89 250.00 310534 10/25/89 197.66 310534 10/25/89 57.30 310534 10/25/89 14.79 REPAIR WORK 680.58 * kkkkk k WORK SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 310545 10/25/89 11.05 REPAIR WORK 11.05 * kkkkkk WOEK SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP 310567 10/27/89 3,125.00 REPAIR PARTS 3,125.00 * kkkkkk PARTS SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP 310572 10/31/89 145.00 REPAIR PARTS 145.00 * kkkkkk 310577 10/25/89 100.00 - 310577 10/25/89 185.00 310577 10/25/89 100.00 310577 10/25/89 100.00 310577 10/25/89 261.15 310577 10/25/89 185.00 731.15 310578 10/25/89 224.80 310578 10/25/89 5.46 310578 10/25/89 80.28 310578 10/25/89 24.78 310578 10/25/89 352.64 687.96 kkkkk k 310590 10/25/89 263.00 263.00 kkkkkk CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT SOUTHDALE FORD LATCH SOUTHDALE FORD REPAI RPARTS SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS SOUTHDALE FORD BOOSTER SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS SOUTHDALE FORD SWITCH ST. PAUL BOOK CALENDARS STORE FRONT HUMAN SERVICES STREICHERS AMMUNITION SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR WORK SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR WORK SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR WORK SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR WORK SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR WORK SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR WOEK SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP REPAIR PARTS SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP REPAIR PARTS SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP REPAIR PARTS SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP VALVE SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP REPAIR PARTS SWANSON BROTHERS CEMENT 11 -06 -89 PAGE 27 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 28- 4544 - 702 -70 21309 4140 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 220907 10- 4540 - 560 -56 219673 10- 4540 - 560 -56 20170 10- 4540 - 560 -56 220100 10- 4540 - 560 -56 219689 10- 4540 - 560 -56 219796 * ** -CKS 27- 4516- 661 -66 959231 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 504 -50 112311 * ** -CKS 10- 4572 - 420 -42 65532 * ** -CKS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 90933 10- 4248 - 560 -56 6251 10- 4248 - 560 -56 90933 10- 4248 - 560 -56 90933 10- 4248 - 560 -56 06072 10- 4248 - 560 -56 6227 10- 4540 - 520 -52 3736 10- 4540 - 520 -52 3821 10- 4540- 646 -64 2729 40- 4540 - 802 -80 3804 40- 4540 - 803 -80 3931 * ** -CKS 10- 4528 - 314 -30 24033 3809 40 4 40 * ** -CKS 11 -06 -89 PAGE 28 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 27- 4201 - 662 -66 27- 4201 - 662 -66 30559 4013 40- 4201 - 800 -80 5828 40- 4201 - 800 -80 5648 * ** -CKS 27- 4624 - 663 -66 * ** -CKS 28- 4248 - 702 -70 35014 3615 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 644 -64 10- 4208 - 644 -64 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 803 -80 32420 3828 10- 4610 - 560 -56 472883 4104 * ** -CKS 27- 4540- 664 -66 20987 4046 * ** -CKS 40- 4540 - 807 -80 125333 4121 * ** -CKS 50- 4630 - 822 -82 057310 10- 4540 - 560 -56 56136 3832 * ** -CKS 10- 4612 - 560 -56 T13667 10- 4266- 440 -44 19576 4060 * * * -CKS ti bw 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 31OS96 10/25/89 80.00 AMY SMITH CLEANING 310S96 10/27/89 80.00 AMY SMITH CLEANING 160.00 * 31OS97 10/30/89 268.41 SEH PROF ENG SERV 310597 10/30/89 10,533.53 SEH PRO ENG SERV 10,801.94 * * * * * ** 310T08 10/31/89 333.94 TARGET FOOD STUFF 333.94 * * * * * ** 31OT11 10/25/89 472.50 TESSMAN SEED & CHEM. REPAIRS 472.50 * * * * * ** 310T13 10/27/89 825.00 TOM HORWATH FORESTRY WORK 310T13 10/27/89 83.76 TOM HORWATH MILEAGE 908.76 * * * * * ** 31OT40 10/30/89 42.57 TOLL COMPANY GENERAL SUPPLIES 31OT40 10/25/89 76.40 TOLL COMPANY WELDING SUPPLIES 118.97 * * * * * ** 31OT42 10/25/89 31.66 TOOLS BY OLSEN CHAINS FOR SAW 31.66 * * * * * ** 31OT46 10/30/89 301.85 TOTAL TOOL TOOLS 301.85 * * * * * ** 31OT49 10/25/89 33.00 TOW DISTRIBUTING BEER 33.00 * 31OT50 10/25/89 28.00 TOWN & COUNTRY DODGE TIRE TUBE 28.00 * * * * * ** 31OT53 10/25/89 4,360.04 TRACY OIL GASOLINE 4,360.04 * 31OU08 10/25/89 287.15 UNIFORMS UNLTD. UNIFORMS .287.15* 11 -06 -89 PAGE 28 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 27- 4201 - 662 -66 27- 4201 - 662 -66 30559 4013 40- 4201 - 800 -80 5828 40- 4201 - 800 -80 5648 * ** -CKS 27- 4624 - 663 -66 * ** -CKS 28- 4248 - 702 -70 35014 3615 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 644 -64 10- 4208 - 644 -64 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 803 -80 32420 3828 10- 4610 - 560 -56 472883 4104 * ** -CKS 27- 4540- 664 -66 20987 4046 * ** -CKS 40- 4540 - 807 -80 125333 4121 * ** -CKS 50- 4630 - 822 -82 057310 10- 4540 - 560 -56 56136 3832 * ** -CKS 10- 4612 - 560 -56 T13667 10- 4266- 440 -44 19576 4060 * * * -CKS ti . s 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -06 -89 PAGE 29 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE siaui4 31OU14 le"25"es 10/25/89 289'.t5 89.17 bNfT D EtEeTRfe eeRP UNITED ELECTRIC CORP U fFeRM9 FREIGHT te 62e6 41t ligt 40- 4540 - 801 -80 i9576 090935 *86e 9640 31OU14 10/25/89 13.06 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP WIRE 40- 4540 - 806 -80 3595 102.23* 3$s -3e-* * * * * ** * ** -CKS 31OU20 10/25/89 210.00 UNIVERSITY OF MN SHORT COURSE 10- 4202 - 200 -20 210.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 310V10 10/25/89 320.99 VALLEY INDUSTRIAL LP FUEL 28- 4612 - 704 -70 320.99 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 31OV15 10/31/89 396.23 VAN PAPER CO. SUPPLIES 1074514 - 520 -52 281915 42945 396.23 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 31OV30 10/30/89 1,199.82 VANTAGE ELECTRIC EMERGENCY REPAIR 27- 4248 - 666 -66 10850 4302 31OV30 10/25/89 48.00 VANTAGE ELECTRIC REPAIR LINE 27- 4288 - 662 -66 10825 3953 1,247.82 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 31OV36 10/30/89 47.00 VAUGHN DISPLAY FLAD 27- 4516 - 661 -66 25495 4130 47.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 31OV55 10/30/89 66.33 VIKING ELECTRIC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 390 -30 833146 4093 66.33 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 31OV80 10/30/89 135.16 VOSS ELECTRIC SUP LAMPS 10 -4540- 520 -52 257974 4084 31OV80 10/31/89 447.84 VOSS ELECTRIC SUP LIGHT BULBS 27- 4504- 667 -66 256865 3768 583.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 31OW08 10/30/89 80.47 W.W. GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 3983 31OW08 10/30/89 12.35 W.W. GRAINGER VALVES 10- 4540 - 540 -54 3990 31OW08 10/30/89 322.50 W.W. GRAINGER HEATER 40- 4540 - 802 -80 4114 415.32 * 31OW09 10/25/89 48.00 W.W. GOETSCH REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 532341 2837 48.00 * 31OW10 10/31/89 63.36 WALKER - MERWIN MILEAGE 27- 4208 - 661 -66 63.36 * 40 40 40 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 31OW11 10/31/89 490.63 490.63 * * * * * ** 31OW14 10/25/89 50.08 50.08 * * * * * ** 31OW25 10/25/89 426.76 31OW25 10/25/89 83.14 31OW25 10/25/89 91.30 31OW25 10/25/89 426.76 31OW25 10/25/89 115.00 31OW25 10/25/89 52.25 31OW25 10/25/89 27.71 31OW25 10/25/89 128.00 31OW25 10/25/89 332.54 31OW25 10/25/89 76.75 31OW25 10/25/89 46.67 31OW25 10/25/89 166.40 31OW25 10/25/89 166.40 31OW25 10/25/89 61.00 31OW25 10/25/89 30.50 2,231.18 * * * * * ** 31OW44 10/25/89 356.85 31OW44 10/25/89 80.35 437.20 * * * * * ** 31OW81 10/25/89 9.00 31OW81 10/25/89 9.00 31OW81 10/25/89 9.00 31OW81 10/25/89 19.50 31OW81 10/25/89 9.00 26- 4250 - 682 -68 GARAGE 55.50 * * * * * ** 27- 4250 - 664 -66 GARAGE 31OZ14 10/25/89 2.08 GARAGE 30- 4250 - 782 -78 2.08 * * * * * ** GARAGE 50- 4250 - 861 -86 31OZ18 10/30/89 50.75 10- 4620 - 560 -56 80430 3811 50.75 * * * * * ** 137,427.82 126,529.94 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION W. GORDON SMITH GASOLINE WALLIN -JOHN WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE WEST WELD SUPPLY CO WEST WELD SUPPLY CO WM H MCCOY WM H MCCOY WM H MCCOY WM H MCCOY WM H MCCOY ZIEGLER INC ZIP PRINTING FUND 10 TOTAL CONFERENCE 11 -06 -89 PAGE 30 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 27- 4612 - 664 -66 42870 4161 10- 4202 - 160 -16 GARAGE 10- 4250 - 301 -30 GARAGE 10- 4250 - 440 -44 GARAGE 10- 4250 - 520 -52 GARAGE 10- 4250 - 540 -54 GARAGE 10- 4250 - 645 -64 GARAGE 10- 4250 - 645 -64 GARAGE 23- 4250 - 612 -61 GARAGE 26- 4250 - 682 -68 GARAGE 27- 4250- 662 -66 GARAGE 27- 4250 - 664 -66 GARAGE 27- 4250 - 667 -66 GARAGE 28- 4250- 702 -70 GARAGE 30- 4250 - 782 -78 GARAGE 50- 4250- 841 -84 GARAGE 50- 4250 - 861 -86 WHEEL MASONRY 10- 4504 - 301 -30 80306 3816 ELECTRODE 10- 4620 - 560 -56 80430 3811 PROPANE PROPANE PROPANE PROPANE PROPANE GASKETS PRINTING GENERAL FUND 10- 4504 - 314 -30 18402 3594 10- 4504 - 314 -30 20602 3807 10- 4504- 314 -30 19303 3720 10- 4504 - 314 -30 20201 3754 10- 4504 - 314 -30 19652 3735 10- 4540 - 560 -56 3816 23- 4600 - 611 -61 5457 4146 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 2,025.00 258.46 3,471.59 247.37 128.00 13;434.47 7,263.17 7,265.98 744.11 16,421.74 261,372.09 1,521.00 13,737.42 76,631.05 534,691.63* ,797.62 11 -06 -89 PAGE 31 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 40 4w 40 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION FUND 11 TOTAL C.D.B.G. FUND 12 TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER FUND 25 TOTAL CAPITAL FUND FUND 26 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUND FUND 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND FUND 30 TOTAL EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND FUND 41 TOTAL STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND FUND 60 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION FUND TOTAL 11 -06 -89 PAGE 31 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 40 4w 40 r { i * * ** ** * *P -CKS 248E26 09/15/89 42.65 ED PHILLIPS MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 MANUAL 1989 CITY OF EDINA 42.65 * CHECK REGISTER 09 -30 -89 PAGE 1 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 4 P.O. # MESSAGE 244C33 09/15/89 78,000.00 DEPOSIT ACCT /EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 244C33 09/15/89 78,000.00- DEPOSIT ACCT /EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL .00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 248712 09/15/89 75.00 RADISSON ARROWWOOD CONFERENCE 10- 4202 - 160 -16 MANUAL 75.00 * 248713 .09/15/89 75.00 RADISSON ARROWWOOD CONFERENCE 10- 4202 - 160 -16 MANUAL 248M98 09/15/89 75.00 * MINNEGASCO HEAT. 10- 4254 - 440 -44 MANUAL * * * * ** 09/15/89 12.41 MINNEGASCO HEAT 10- 4254 - 520 -52 * ** -CKS 248E11 09/15/89 53.84 EAGLE WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 822' -82 MANUAL 248M98 09/15/89 53.84 MINNEGASCO HEAT 10- 4254 - 646 -64 MANUAL * * ** ** * *P -CKS 248E26 09/15/89 42.65 ED PHILLIPS MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 MANUAL 42.65 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 248F14 09/15/89 14,130:30 FIDELITY BANK FICA 10- 4149 - 510 -51 MANUAL 248F14 09/15/89 783.98 FIDELITY BANK MEDICARE 10- 4162 - 510 -51 MANUAL 14,914.28 * * * ** ** * ** -CKS 248M24 09/15/89 16,444.65 MEDCENTER HOSP PREM 10- 4156 - 510 -51 MANUAL 16,444.65 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 248M98 09/15/89 65.48 MINNEGASCO HEAT. 10- 4254 - 440 -44 MANUAL 248M98 09/15/89 12.41 MINNEGASCO HEAT 10- 4254 - 520 -52 MANUAL 248M98 09/15/89 82.37 MINNEGASCO HEAT 10- 4254- 540 -54 MANUAL 248M98 09/15/89 78.90 MINNEGASCO HEAT 10- 4254 - 646 -64 MANUAL 248M98 09/15/89 9.17 MINNEGASCO HEAT 23- 4254 - 612 -61 MANUAL 248M98 09/15/89 71.53 MINNEGASCO HEAT 27- 4254 - 662 -66 MANUAL 248M98 09/15/89 16.42 MINNEGASCO HEAT 27- 4254 - 664 -66 MANUAL 248M98 09/15/89 3.00 MINNEGASCO HEAT 27- 4254 - 667 -66 MANUAL 248M98 09/15/89 77.08 MINNEGASCO HEAT 28- 4254 - 702 -70 MANUAL 248M98 09/15/89 149.04 MINNEGASCO HEAT 30- 4254 - 782 -78 MANUAL 248M98 09/15/89 29.85 MINNEGASCO HEAT 40- 4254 - 801 -80 MANUAL 248M98 09/15/89 270.89 MINNEGASCO HEAT 40- 4254 - 803 -80 MANUAL 248M98 09/15/89 11.18 MINNEGASCO HEAT 50- 4254- 841 -84 MANUAL 248M98 09/15/89 9.80 MINNEGASCO HEAT 50- 4254 - 861 -86 MANUAL 887.12 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 249A84 09/15/89 37.02 249A82 TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL 249A84 09/15/89 144.00 249A83 TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 249A84 09/15/89 249A84 09/15/89 249A84 09/15/89 249A84 09/15/89 249A84 09/15/89 * * * * ** POWER 249P32 09/15/89 * * * * ** 124.31 250F56 09/15/89 * * * * ** NSP 251761 09/15/89 * * * * ** POWER 251N16 09/15/89 251N16 09/15/89 251N16 09/15/89 251N16 09/15/89 251N16 09/15/89 251N16 09/15/89 251N16 09/15/89 251N16 09/15/89 251N16 09/15/89 251N16 09/15/89 251N16 09/15/89 251N16 09/15/89 251N16 09/15/89 251N16 09/15/89 251N16 09/15/89 251N16 09/15/89 251N16 09/15/89 25-IN16 09/15/89 251N16 09/15/89 251N16 09/15/89 251N16 09/15/89 251N16 09/15/89 251N16 09/15/89 251N16 09/15/89 251N16 09/15/89 251N16 09/15/89 * * * * ** 254E11 10/17/89 AMOUNT 57.49 44.54 15.06 .29 16.20 314.60 24,350.61 24,350.61 * 10,773.00 10,773.00 * 100.00 100.00 * CHECK REGISTER e VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 249A83 TELEPHONE 249A82 TELEPHONE 249A82 TELEPHONE 249A82 TELEPHONE AT &T TELEPHONE P.E.R.A. F B HALL INS ANDRON INC PERA INSURANCE EARNEST MONEY 1,037.72 NSP POWER 12,281.01 NSP POWER 10,594.09 NSP POWER 3,015.64 NSP POWER 68.32 NSP POWER 124.31 NSP POWER 2,052.06 NSP POWER 1,096.54 NSP POWER 44.13 NSP POWER 1,906.21 NSP POWER 2,178.81 NSP POWER 5,936.27 NSP POWER 557.54 NSP POWER 1,411.36 NSP POWER 4,005.11 NSP POWER 264.33 NSP POWER 728.75 NSP POWER 6,151.46 NSP POWER 206.49 NSP POWER 8,328.90 NSP POWER 2,633.89 NSP POWER 35,252.62 NSP POWER 364.39 NSP POWER 783.31 NSP POWER 1,233.30 NSP POWER 582.23 NSP POWER 102,838.79 MANUAL 16.36- EAGLE WINE DISCOUNT 09 -30 -89 PAGE 2 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 23- 4256 - 612 -61 MANUAL 27- 4256 - 662 -66 MANUAL 30- 4256 - 782 -78 MANUAL 50- 4256 - 821 -82 MANUAL 50- 4256 - 861 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4145- 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS i` 10- 4260 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 500 -50 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4252 - 301 -30 MANUAL 10- 4252- 321 -30 MANUAL 10- 4252- 322 -30 MANUAL 10- 4252- 330 -30 MANUAL 10- 4252 - 345 -30 MANUAL 10- 4252 - 358 -30 MANUAL 10- 4252 - 375 -30 MANUAL 10- 4252 - 440 -44 MANUAL 10- 4252 - 460 -46 MANUAL 10- 4252 - 520 -52 MANUAL 10- 4252 - 540 -54 MANUAL j 10- 4252 - 646 -64 MANUAL 23- 4252- 612 -61 MANUAL 26- 4252 - 682 -68 MANUAL 27- 4252 - 662 -66 MANUAL 27- 4252 - 664 -66 MANUAL 27- 4252 - 667 -66 MANUAL 28- 4252 - 702 -70 MANUAL 29- 4252 - 722 -72 MANUAL 30- 4252 - 782 -78 MANUAL 40- 4252 - 801 -80 MANUAL 40- 4252 - 803 -80 MANUAL ; 40- 4252 - 804 -80 MANUAL 50- 4252 - 821 -82 MANUAL 1 50- 4252 - 841 -84 MANUAL , 50- 4252 - 861 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL V. 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 09 -30 -89 PAGE 3 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 254EII 10/17/89 6.63- EAGLE WINE DISCOUNT 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 254E11 10/17/89 23.66- EAGLE WINE DISCOUNT 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 254EII 10/17/89 818.01 EAGLE WINE WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 254E11 10/17/89 331.26 EAGLE WINE WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 254E11 10/17/89 1,183.00 EAGLE WINE WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 254EII 09/15/89 83.65 EAGLE WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 MANUAL 2,369.27 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 254E26 10/17/89 14.66- ED PHILLIPS DISCOUNT 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 254E26 10/17/89 5.72- ED PHILLIPS DISCOUNT 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 254E26 10/17/89 16.48- ED PHILLIPS DISCOUNT 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 254E26 10/17/89 15.84- ED PHILLIPS DISCOUNT 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 254E26 10/17/89 18.47- ED PHIILIPS DISCOUNT 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 254E26 10/17/89 24.15- ED PHILLIPS DISCOUNT 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 254E26 10/17/89 286.63 ED PHILLIPS LIQUOR 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 254E26 10/17/89 792.31 ED PHILLIPS LIQUOR 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 254E26 10/17/89 922.50 ED PHILLIPS LIQUOR 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 254E26 10/17/89 1,467.38 ED PHILLIPS WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 254E26 10/17/89 1,649.44 ED PHILLIPS WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 254E26 10/17/89 2,420.07 ED PHILLIPS WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 7,443.01 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 254G82 10/10/89 59.17- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL 254G82 10/10/89 65.99- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL 254G82 10/10/89 141.86- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 254G82 10/10/89 26.30- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 254682 10/10/89 11.33- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 254G82 10/10/89 113.79- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 254G82 10/10/89 4.53- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 254G82 10/10/89 96.33- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 254G82 10/10/89 6.80- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 254G82 10/10/89 6.80- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 254G82 10/10/89 6.80 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 254G82 10/10/89 566.50 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 254G82 10/10/89 1,315.04 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 254G82 10/10/89 5,689.31 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 254G82 10/10/89 226.60 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 254G82 10/10/89 4,816.41 •GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 254G82 10/10/89 339.90- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 254G82 10/10/89 339.90 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 254G82 10/10/89 339.90 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 254G82 10/10/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 254G82 10/10/89 20.06- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 254G82 10/10/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 254G82 10/10/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 12,407.60 254H83 09/15/89 80,000.00 HRA DUE FROM HRA 10- 1145 - 000 -00 MANUAL 80,000.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS * * * * ** * ** -CKS 254P82 10/17/89 11.68- PRIOR WINE DISCOUNT 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 254P82 1989 CITY OF EDINA PRIOR WINE DISCOOUNT CHECK REGISTER MANUAL 09 -30 -89 PAGE 4 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 254J62 10/10/89 8.26- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 10/17/89 MANUAL 254J62 10/10/89 52.12- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 205.74 MANUAL 254J62 10/10/89 14.73- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 254J62 10/10/89 .60- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 254J62 10/10/89 14.73 JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 254J62 10/10/89 14.73- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL 254J62 10/10/89 10.93- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 254Q16 MANUAL 254J62 10/10/89 102.90- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 10/17/89 MANUAL 254J62 10/10/89 14.80 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 2,292.81 MANUAL 254J62 10/10/89 2,607.22 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 QUALITY WINE MANUAL 254J62 10/10/89 5,143.73 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 WINE MANUAL 254J62 10/10/89 26.40 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 254J62 10/10/89 840.32 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 * ** -CKS MANUAL `c 254J62 10/10/89 172.89- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL f 254J62 10/10/89 1,493.26- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 254J62 10/10/89 60.48 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 254J62 10/10/89 18.40 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 254J62 10/10/89 1,474.86 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 254J62 10/10/89 1,493.26 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 254J62 10/10/89 .80 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 254J62 10/10/89 16.40 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 254J62 10/10/89 1,093.22 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 10,934.20 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 254P20 10/10/89 5.00- PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 254P20 10/10/89 129.25 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 254P20 10/10/89 4.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 128.25 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 254P82 10/17/89 11.68- PRIOR WINE DISCOUNT 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 254P82 10/17/89 7.15- PRIOR WINE DISCOOUNT 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 254P82 10/17/89 4.11- PRIOR WINE DISCOUNT 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 254P82 10/17/89 583.93 PRIOR WINE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 254P82 10/17/89 357.37 PRIOR WINE WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 254P82 10/17/89 205.74 PRIOR WINE WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 1,124.10 * ** -CKS ` 254Q16 10/17/89 22.64- QUALITY WINE DISCOUNT 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 254Q16 10/17/89 7.21- QUALITY WINE DISCOUNT 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 254Q16 10/17/89 45.86- QUALITY WINE DISCOUNT 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 254Q16 10/17/89 25.66- QUALITY WINE DISCOUNT 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 254Q16 10/17/89 1,132.64 QUALITY WINE LIQUOR 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL d�l 254Q16 10/17/89 2,292.81 QUALITY WINE LIQUOR 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 254Q16 10/17/89 1,700.77 QUALITY WINE WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 254Q16 10/17/89 718.20 QUALITY WINE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 5,743.05 * * * * ** * ** -CKS i Alo 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 254T49 10/17/89 254T49 10/17/89 * * * * ** GC 256700 09/15/89 256701 09/15/89 256702 09/15/89 * * * * ** GC 256B73 09/15/89 256673 09/15/89 256673 09/15/89 256873 09/15/89 256873 .09/15/89 256873 09/15/89 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 257703 09/15/89 * ** -CKS 257A82 09/15/89 257A82 09/15/89 257A82 09/15/89 257A82 09/15/89 257A82 09/15/89 257A82 09/15/89 257A82 09/15/89 257A82 09/15/89 257A82 09/15/89 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 257P70 09/15/89 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 257U27 09/15/89 257U27 09/15/89 257U27 09/15/89 257U27 09/15/89 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 148.15 TOW DIST WINE 102.90 TOW DIST WINE 251.05 175.00 C WAYNE COURTNEY 175.00 * 220.00 MIKE RAWLINGS 220.00 * 177,850.40 PROG CONTRACT 177,850.40 * 433.75 GC PETTY CASH 46.20 GC PETTY CASH 43.31 GC PETTY CASH 30.00 GC PETTY CASH 6.30 GC PETTY CASH 91.55 GC PETTY CASH 651.11 MANUAL 27- 4516 - 661 -66 MANUAL 795.45 MICHELLE BERGMAN 795.45 * 17.29 257A83 .73 AT &T 1.25 AT &T 3.81 AT &T 45.38 AT &T .6.07 AT &T 6.89 AT &T 16.20 249A84 8.10 249A84 105.72 MANUAL 160.00 POSTMASTER 160.00 * 3,210.02 248U27 150.26 US WEST COMM 96.88 US WEST COMM 195.08 248U27 PRO SERVICES PRO SERVICES PAYMENT SALARIES SALARIES SERVICES DUES OFFICE SUPPLIES CONCESSIONS PRO SERV TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE POSTAGE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 09 -30 -89 PAGE 5 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 30- 4201 - 782 -78 MANUAL 30- 4201 - 782 -78 MANUAL 60- 2040 - 000 -00 MANUAL * ** -CKS 27- 4120 - 663 -66 MANUAL 27- 4120 - 666 -66 MANUAL 27- 4201 - 663 -66 MANUAL 27- 4204 - 661 -66 MANUAL 27- 4516 - 661 -66 MANUAL 27- 4624 - 663 -66 MANUAL * ** -CKS 30- 4201 - 781 -78 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL 10- 4256- 510 -51 MANUAL 23- 4256 - 612 -61 MANUAL 26- 4256 - 682 -68 MANUAL 27- 4256- 662 -66 MANUAL 27- 4256 - 664 -66 MANUAL 29- 4256 - 722 -72 MANUAL 40- 4256 - 801 -80 MANUAL 50- 4256 - 821 -82 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4290 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL 10- 4256 - 622 -62 MANUAL 10- 4256 - 622 -62 MANUAL 1 i 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 09 -30 -89 PAGE 6 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 257U27 09/15/89 125.42 248U27 TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 628 -62 MANUAL 257U27 09/15/89 22.11 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 628 -62 MANUAL 257U27 09/15/89 29.28 248U27 TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 646 -64 MANUAL 257U27 09/15/89 29.22 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 646 -64 MANUAL 257U27 09/15/89 .159.59 248U27 TELEPHONE 23- 4256 - 612 -61 MANUAL 257U27 09/15/89 61.94 248U27 TELEPHONE 26- 4256 - 682 -68 MANUAL 257U27 09/15/89 280.61 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 27- 4256 - 662 -66 MANUAL 257U27 09/15/89 52.44 248U27 TELEPHONE 27- 4256 - 662 -66 MANUAL 257U27 09/15/89 52.66 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 27- 4256 - 664 -66 MANUAL 257U27 09/15/89 127.76 248U27 TELEPHONE 27- 4256- 667 -66 MANUAL 257U27 09/15/89 108.98 248U27 TELEPHONE 28- 4256 - 702 -70 MANUAL 257U27 09/15/89 201.78 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 28- 4256 - 702 -70 MANUAL r. 257U27 09/15/89 41.42 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 29- 4256 - 722 -72 MANUAL 257U27 09/15/89 50.76 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 30- 4256- 782 -78 MANUAL r' 257U27 09/15/89 268.92 248U27 TELEPHONE 30- 4256 - 782 -78 MANUAL 257U27 09/15/89 104.43 248U27 TELEPHONE 40- 4256 - 801 -80' MANUAL a 257U27 09/15/89 49.41 248U27 TELEPHONE 40- 4256- 803 -80 MANUAL 257U27 09/15/89 59.07 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 40- 4256- 803 -80 MANUAL 257U27 09/15/89 135.68 248U27 TELEPHONE 50- 4256- 821 -82 MANUAL 257U27 09/15/89 178.07 248U27 TELEPHONE 50- 4256 - 841 -84 MANUAL 257U27 09/15/89 126.53 248U27 TELEPHONE 50- 4256- 861 -86 MANUAL 5,918.32 * * * * * ** * ** —CKS 258C33 09/15/89 100,000.00— DEPOSIT ACCT /EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 258C33 09/15/89 100,000.00 DEPOSIT ACCT /EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL .00 * * * * * ** * ** —CKS 262C51 10/10/89 270.50 COMM OF REV SALES TAX 10- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 262C51 10/10/89 126.99 COMM OF REV SALES TAX 23- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 262C51 10/10/89 913.60 COMM OF REV SALES TAX 26- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 262C51 10/10/89 12,870.27 COMM OF REV. SALES TAX 27- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 262C51 10/10/89 56.40 COMM OF REV SALES TAX 28- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 262C51 10/10/89 156.86 COMM OF REV SALES TAX 29- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 262C51 10/10/89 155.17 COMM OF REV SALES TAX 30- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 262C51 10/10/89 2,510.38 COMM OF REV SALES TAX 40- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 262C51 10/10/89 7,556.31— COMM OF REV SALES TAX 50- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 262C51 10/10/89 7,556.31 COMM OF REV SALES TAX 50- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 262C51 10/10/89 7,556.31 COMM OF REV SALES TAX 50- 3357 - 001 -00 MANUAL 262C51 10/10/89 14,398.70 COMM OF REV SALES TAX 50- 3357 - 002 -00 MANUAL 262C51 10/10/89 14,286.10 COMM OF REV SALES TAX 50- 3357 - 003 -00 MANUAL 53,301.28 * * * * ** * ** —CKS; 262E11 10/10/89 4.41— EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 262EII 10/10/89 5.01— EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 262EII 10/10/89 5.60— EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 262EII 10/10/89 18.46— EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 262E11 10/10/89 17.96— EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 262E11 10/10/89 19.69— EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 262EII 10/10/89 220.63 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 1 i 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 09 -30 -89 PAGE 71 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 262E11 10/10/89 250.49 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 262E11 10/10/89 279.80 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 262E11 10/10/89 922.95 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 262E11 10/10/89 897.99 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 262E11 10/10/89 984.64 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL . 262E11 10/10/89 40.58 EAGLE WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 822 -82 MANUAL 262E11 10/10/89 141.89 EAGLE WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 862 -86 MANUAL 3,667.84 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 262E26 10/10/89 5.07- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 262E26 10/10/89 16.01- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 262E26 10/10/89 3.28- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 . MANUAL 262E26 10/10/89 12.34- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 262E26 10/10/89 .68- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 262E26 10/10/89 .85- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 262E26 10/10/89 7.62- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 262E26 10/10/89 3.31- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 262E26 10/10/89 .89- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 262E26 10/10/89- 12.93- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 262E26 10/10/89 17.41- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 262E26 10/10/89 24.35- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 262E26 10/10/89 9.81- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 262E26 10/10/89 9.40- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 262E26 10/10/89 3.32- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 262E26 10/10/89 800.87 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 262E26 10/10/89 870.94 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 262E26 10/10/89 44.90 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 262E26 10/10/89 1,217.55 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 262E26 10/10/89 1,234.70 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 262E26 10/10/89 328.39 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 262E26 10/10/89 507.58 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 262E26 10/10/89 85.85 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 262E26 10/10/89 331.71 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 262E26 10/10/89 762.02 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 262E26 10/10/89 1,293.92 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 262E26 10/10/89 68.40 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 262E26 10/10/89 332.21 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 262E26 10/10/89 940.59 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 262E26 10/10/89 981.81 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 262E26 10/10/89 35.50 ED PHILLIPS BEER 50- 4630- 842 -84 MANUAL 9,709.67 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 262F14 10/10/89 13,979.77 FIDELITY BANK FICA 10- 4149 - 510 -51 MANUAL 262F14 10/10/89 675.71 FIDELITY BANK MEDICARE 10- 4162 - 510 -51 MANUAL 14,655.48 * * * *** * ** -CKS 262G82 10/10/89 87.73- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL 262G82 10/10/89 52.05- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 262G82 10/10/89 90.79- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION m 09 -30 -89 PAGE 8 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 262G82 10/10/89 100.97- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 262G82 10/10/89 23.30- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 262G82 10/10/89 137.45- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 262G82 10/10/89 4,539.66 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 822 -82 262G82 10/10/89 1,165.01 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 262G82 10/10/89 5,048.52 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 262G82 10/10/89 6,872.66 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 862 -86 262G82 10/10/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 842 -84 262G82 10/10/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 862 -86 17,133.56 * * * * ** 262G86 10/10/89 11,570.95 GROUP HEALTH HOSP PREM 10- 4156 - 510 -51 11,570.95 * * * * ** 262J62 10/10/89 11.38- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 262J62 10/10/89 44.55 - JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 262J62 10/10/89 7.97- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 262J62 10/10/89 8.85- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 262J62 10/10/89 9.04- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 262J62 10/10/89 116.13- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 262J62 10/10/89 9.23- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 262J62 10/10/89 9.75- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 262J62 10/10/89 69.87- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 262J62 10/10/89 2,227.87 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 262J62 10/10/89 8.60 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 262J62 10/10/89 5,807.08 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 262J62 10/10/89 32.80 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 262J62 10/10/89 16.40 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 262J62 10/10/89 3,493.49 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 262J62 10/10/89 15.60 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 262J62 10/10/89 1,137.71 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 262J62 10/10/89 797.84 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 262J62 10/10/89 10.80 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 262J62 10/10/89 884.53 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 262J62 10/10/89 16.80 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 262J62 10/10/89 8.80 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 262J62 10/10/89 904.89 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 262J62 10/10/89 925.15 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 262J62 10/10/89 973.32 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 262J62 10/10/89 6.80 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 262J62 10/10/89 19.60 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 17,001.31 * * * * ** 262P20 10/10/89 316.50 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 262P20 10/10/89 7.20 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 262P20 10/10/89 100.50 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 262P20 10/10/89 3.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 262P20 10/10/89 3,455.90 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 262P20 10/10/89 7.20- PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 * * * * ** 262P32 10/10/89 24,286.06 P.E.R.A. PERA MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 24,286.06 * ** -CKS * * * * ** MANUAL 1989 CITY OF EDINA 10- 4156 - 510 -51 262P42 10/10/89 CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 262P20 10/10/89 7.20 PAUSTIS & SONS 262P20 10/10/89 3,455.90- PAUSTIS & SONS 262P20 10/10/89 335.90 PAUSTIS & SONS 262P20 10/10/89 7.20 PAUSTIS & SONS .55- PRIOR WINE 770.30 262P82 10/10/89 17.31- * * * * ** 262P32 10/10/89 24,286.06 P.E.R.A. PERA MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 24,286.06 * ** -CKS * * * * ** MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4156 - 510 -51 262P42 10/10/89 18,518.00 PHP HOSP PREM 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 18,518.00 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 * * * * ** 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 262P82 10/10/89 1.10- PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82- 262P82 10/10/89 6.38- PRIOR WINE MANUAL 262P82 10/10/89 .55- PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 262P82 10/10/89 .55- PRIOR WINE MANUAL 262P82 10/10/89 17.31- PRIOR WINE 50- 4632 - 842 -84 262P82 10/10/89 1.09- PRIOR WINE MANUAL 262P82 10/10/89 .96- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 262P82 10/10/89 10.17- PRIOR WINE MANUAL 262P82 10/10/89 27.59 PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 262P82 10/10/89 299.28 PRIOR WINE MANUAL 262P82 10/10/89 55.18 PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 262P82 10/10/89 27.59 PRIOR WINE 262P82 10/10/89 19.95 PRIOR WINE WINE 262P82 10/10/89 54.50 PRIOR WINE 262P82 10/10/89 865.44 PRIOR WINE 262P82 10/10/89 508.67 PRIOR WINE 262P82 10/10/89 48.05 PRIOR WINE 262P82 10/10/89 93.54 PRIOR WINE MIX 262P82 10/10/89 72.42 PRIOR WINE MIX 2,034.10 262Q16 10/10/89 30.16 - QUALITY WINE 262Q16 10/10/89 8.95- QUALITY WINE 262Q16 10/10/89 .34- QUALITY WINE 262Q16 10/10/89 .83- QUALITY WINE 262Q16 10/10/89 1.76- QUALITY WINE 262Q16 10/10/89 7.14- QUALITY WINE 262Q16 10/10/89 7.14 QUALITY WINE 262Q16 10/10/89 69.24- QUALITY WINE 262Q16 10/10/89 7.00- QUALITY WINE 262Q16 .10/10/89 1.21- QUALITY WINE 262Q16 10/10/89 16.40- QUALITY WINE 262Q16 10/10/89 2.17- QUALITY WINE 262Q16 10/10/89 97.25- QUALITY WINE 262Q16 10/10/89 1.11- QUALITY WINE 09 -30 -89 PAGE 9 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 5.0- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4145 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4156 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82- MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4632 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4632 - 842 -84 MANUAL * * *' -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL * * * * ** 264749 a 30.00 HOLIDAY EXPO CONFERENCE 1989 CITY OF EDINA 40.00 HOLIDAY EXPO CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 262Q16 10/10/89 6.34- QUALITY WINE 262Q16 10/10/89 1,507.07 QUALITY WINE 262Q16 10/10/89 3,462.58 QUALITY WINE 262Q16 10/10/89 108.67 QUALITY WINE. 262Q16 10/10/89 4,862.36 QUALITY WINE 262Q16 10/10/89 892.25 QUALITY WINE 262Q16 10/10/89 34.50 QUALITY WINE 262Q16 10/10/89 83.20 QUALITY WINE 262Q16 10/10/89 711.70- QUALITY WINE 262Q16 10/10/89 176.00 QUALITY WINE 262Q16 10/10/89, 120.75 QUALITY WINE 262Q16 10/10/89 1,638.12 QUALITY WINE 262Q16 10/10/89 617.20 QUALITY WINE 262Q16 10/10/89 711.70 QUALITY WINE 262Q16 10/10/89 110.60 QUALITY WINE 262Q16 10/10/89 632.00 QUALITY WINE MIX 14,002.54 * 2,095.94 * * * * ** *:704 10/10/89 100.00 N CENT SEC AWWA SCHOOL 269E26 100.00 * 6.13- ED PHILLIPS * * * * ** 264749 10/17/89 30.00 HOLIDAY EXPO CONFERENCE 264749 10/17/89 40.00 HOLIDAY EXPO CONFERENCE 264749 10/17/89 35.00 HOLIDAY EXPO CONFERENCE MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 105.00 * 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 264750 10/10/89 145.86 RAY ELIOT CHEV BROKEN WINDOW MANUAL 50 -4628- 842 -84 145.86 * 50- 4628 - 862 -86 . * * * * ** MANUAL 268M24 10/10/89 15,661.85 MEDCENTER HEALTH HOSP PREM 15,661.85 * * * * * ** 269E11 10/10/89 8.21- EAGLE WINE. 269E11 10/10/89 8.34- EAGLE WINE 269E11 10/10/89 17.51- EAGLE WINE 269EII 10/10/89 410.38 EAGLE WINE 269EII 10/10/89 417.09 EAGLE WINE 269EII 10/10/89 875.72 EAGLE WINE 269EII 10/10/89 20.54 EAGLE WINE MIX 269EII 10/10/89 40.58 EAGLE WINE MIX 269E11 10/10/89 365.69 EAGLE WINE MIX 2,095.94 * * * * ** 269E26 10/10/89 2.88- ED PHILLIPS 269E26 10/10/89 6.13- ED PHILLIPS U 09 -30 -89 PAGE 10 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 * ** -CKS 40- 4202 - 809 -80 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS 50- 4202 - 820 -82 MANUAL 50- 4202 - 840 -84 MANUAL 50- 4202 - 860 -86 MANUAL 10- 4201 - 500 -50 MANUAL 50- 4632 - 842 -84 * ** -CKS 10- 4156 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4632 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4632 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4632 - 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL AW .i .J d1 �ftd �./ a 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 09 -30 -89 PAGE 11 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 269E26 269E26 10/10/89 10/10/89 2.86- 2.99- ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 269E26 10/10/89 11.28- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL 269E26 269E26 10/10/89 10/10/89 8.68- ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 269E26 10/10/89 .35- 9.39- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL 269E26 269E26 10/10/89 10/10/89 31.18- 6.72- ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 269E26 10/10/89 6.33- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL MANUAL 269E26 269E26 10/10/89 10/10/89 2.28- 18.91- ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 269E26 10/10/89 5.77- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL MANUAL 269E26 269E26 10/10/89 10/10/89 143.00 434.20 ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 269E26 10/10/89 1,559.33 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL 269E26 269E26 10/10/89 10/10/89 288.59 ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 269E26 10/10/89 .945.81 613.67 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 862 -86 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL MANUAL 269E26 269E26 10/10/89 10/10/89 288.41 35.10 ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 269E26 10/10/89 939.44 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL 269E26 269E26 10/10/89 10/10/89 299.84 1,128.87 ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 269E26 10/10/89 228.76 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL MANUAL 269E26 269E26 10/10/89 10/10/89 672.38 633.76 ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 269E26 10/10/89 245.00 ED PHILLIPS BEER 50- 4628 - 862 -86 50- 4630 - 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL 269E26 10/10/89 35.50 ED PHILLIPS BEER 50- 4630 - 862 -86 MANUAL 8,375.91 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 269G82 269G82 10/10/89 10/10/89 43.74- 12.02- GRIGGS COOPER GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 269G82 10/10/89 12.85- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL 269G82 269G82 10/10/89 10/10/89 129.10- 1.55- GRIGGS COOPER GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 269G82 10/10/89 106.83- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL MANUAL 269G82 269G82 10/10/89 10/10/89 600.77 2,186.80 GRIGGS COOPER GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 269G82 10/10/89 6,454.91 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 822 -82 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL 269G82 269G82 10/10/89 10/10/89 642.55 77.49 GRIGGS COOPER GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 269G82 10/10/89 5,341.52 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL MANUAL 14,997.95 * ** -CKS 269J62 269J62 10/10/89 10/10/89 4.00- 2.00- JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON,WINE 50- 3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 3.25- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3700 - 822 -82 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL 269J62 269J62 10/10/89 10/10/89 10.50- 14.25- JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 4.50- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3700 - 862 -86' 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 3.21- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL d1 �ftd �./ * * * * ** * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 09 -30 -89 PAGE 12 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 269J62 10/10/89 3.21- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 3.21 JOHNSON WINE 50 =3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 38.64- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 38.64 JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 38.64- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 88.13- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 8.38- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 65.87- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 101.53- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 11.16- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 186.04- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 8.80 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 186.04 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 8.80- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 1,932.04 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 8.80 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 4,383.52 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 3,292.76 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 23.20 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 14.80 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 25.27 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 5,076.85 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 .00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 4.80 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 321.10 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 .00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 4.80- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 4.80 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 6.88- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 321.10- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 321.10 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 13.20 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 .00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 .00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 838.48 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 12.86- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 1,115.16 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 .00' JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 .00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 269J62 10/10/89 18.00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 16,692.82 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 269P82 10/10/89 1.99- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 269P82 10/10/89 2.81- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 269P82 10/10/89 4.54- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 269P82 10/10/89 12.67- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 269P82 10/10/89 140.34 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 269P82 10/10/89 99.55 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 269P82 10/10/89 226.91 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 269P82 10/10/89 633.51 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 269P82 10/10/89 36.21 PRIOR WINE MIX 50- 4632- 822 -82 MANUAL 1,114.51 * * * * ** * ** -CKS -� %w to 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 269Q16 10/10/89 269Q16 10/10/89 269Q16 10/10/89 269Q16 10/10/89 269Q16 10/10/89 269Q16 10/10/89 269Q16 10/10/89 269Q16 10/10/89 269Q16 10/10/89 269Q16 10/10/89 269Q16 10/10/89 269Q16 10/10/89 269Q16 10/10/89 269Q16 10/10/89 269Q16 10/10/89 269Q16 10/10/89 269Q16 10/10/89 269Q16 10/10/89 269Q16 10/10/89 269Q16 10/10/89 269Q16 10/10/89 269Q16 10/10/89 269Q16 10/10/89 269Q16 10/10/89 269Q16 10/10/89 269Q16 10/10/89 269Q16 10/10/89 269Q16 10/10/89 269Q16 10/10/89 269Q16 10/10/89 269Q16 10/10/89 269Q16 10/10/89 * * * * ** 269T49 10/10/89 270P70 10/10/89 * * * * ** 271C47 10/10/89 * * * * ** 271H83 10/10/89 AMOUNT 7.95 - 7.95- 2.62- 39.34- 2.56- 3.93- .52- 59.72- 5.54- 2.41- 95.29- .17- .37 7.28 - 1.06- 130.96 1,967.72' 196.44 2,981.87 4,757.06 253.60 553.30 51.75 240.35 .00 725.30 .00 105.70 36.50- 17.25 7.96 15.91 11,732.70 86.80 86.80 5,000.00 5,000.00 430.20 430.20 100,000.00 100,000.00 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE MIX QUALITY WINE MIX TOW DISTRIBUTING POSTMASTER POSTAGE COMM LIFE INS CO LIFE INS HRA HRA TRANSFER 09 -30 -89 PAGE 13 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4632 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4632 - 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4290 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4157- 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 1145 - 000 -00 MANUAL * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 271N12 10/10/89 2,488.21 2,488.21 * * * * ** 272C33 10/10/89 60,000.00 272C33 10/10/89 60,000.00 * * * * ** 272F14 10/10/89 13,887.87 272F14 10/10/89 563.98 276E11 10/10/89 14,451.85 * * * * ** 276A82 10/10/89 22.72 276A82 10/10/89 3.21 276E11 10/10/89 25.93 276A83 10/10/89 22.72 276A83 10/10/89 22.72 - 276A83 10/10/89 72.00 276A83 10/10/89 57.49 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 129.49 * 276A84 10/10/89 8.10 276A84 10/10/89 8.10 276E26 10/10/89 16.20 * * * * * ** 276E11 10/10/89 .92- 276E11 10/10/89 24.21 - 276E11 10/10/89 10.83 - 276E11 10/10/89 18.80 - 276E11 10/10/89 1,210.57 276E11 10/10/89 45.99 276E11 10/10/89 541.57 276E11 10/10/89 940.02 276E11 10/10/89 40.61 276E11 10/10/89 107.24 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 2,831.24 * * * * ** 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276E26 10/10/89 4.19 - 276E26 10/10/89 2.99 - 276E26 10/10/89 .57- 276E26 10/10/89 4.96 - 276E26 10/10/89 .75- 276E26 10/10/89 2.56 - 276E26 10/10/89 13.70- CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE INSURANCE CITY OF EDINA TRANSFER CITY OF EDINA TRANSFER FIDELITY BANK FICA FIDELITY BANK MEDICARE AT &T TELEPHONE AT &T TELEPHONE AT &T TELEPHONE AT &T TELEPHONE AT &T TELEPHONE AT &T TELEPHONE AT &T TELEPHONE AT &T TELEPHONE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE MIX EAGLE WINE MIX ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS 09 -30 -89 PAGE 14 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4158 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4149 - 510 -51 MANUAL 10- 4162 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL 10- 4256 - 628 -62 MANUAL 10- 4256- 510 -51 MANUAL 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL 10- 4256- 510 -51 MANUAL 23- 4256 - 612 -61 MANUAL 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL 50- 4256- 821 -82 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4632 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4632-842 -84 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL I � .. 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 09 -30 -89 PAGE 15 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 276E26 10/10/89 7.44- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276E26 10/10/89 9.73- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276E26 10/10/89 5.99- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 276E26 10/10/89 10.68- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 276E26 10/10/89 4.31- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 276E26 10/10/89 8.50- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 276E26 10/10/89 3.39- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 276E26 10/10/89 128.40 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276E26 10/10/89 486.50 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276E26 10/10/89 299.68 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 276E26 10/10/89 215.91 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 276E26 10/10/89 496.64 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 276E26 10/10/89 419.43 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 276E26 10/10/89 57.10 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 276E26 10/10/89 299.06 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 276E26 10/10/89 1,370.26 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 276E26 10/10/89 75.60 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276E26 10/10/89 98.65- ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276E26 10/10/89 744.96 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276E26 10/10/89 339.07 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 276E26 10/10/89 850.87 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 276E26 10/10/89 1,068.85 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 276E26 10/10/89 35.50 ED PHILLIPS BEER 50- 4630- 862 -86 MANUAL 6,709.42 *** -CKS :;:G 82 10/10/89 5.30- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL 276G82 10/10/89 42.63- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL 276G82 10/10/89 9.00- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276G82 10/10/89 143.09- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 276G82 10/10/89 41.49- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 276G82 10/10/89 4.49- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276G82 10/10/89 95.79- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276G82 10/10/89 4.58- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 276G82 10/10/89 2,074.55 GRIGGS COOPER_ 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 276G82 10/10/89 4,789.61 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276G82 10/10/89 224.62 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276G82 10/10/89 229.15 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 276G82 10/10/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 276G82 10/10/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 276G82 10/10/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276G82 10/10/89 23.09- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 276G82 10/10/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 6,948.47 * * * * ** ***-CKS 276J62 10/10/89 2.85- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 276J62 10/10/89 4.44- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 276J62 10/10/89 42.20- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 276J62 10/10/89 8.54-- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 276J62 10/10/89 97.21- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276J62 10/10/89 13.70- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276J62 10/10/89 .48- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 =84 MANUAL lk�l �zo 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 09 -30 -89 PAGE 16 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 276J62 10/10/89 5.70- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276J62 10/10/89 8.18- 6.38- JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL MAN AL 276J62 276J62 10/10/89 10/10/89 51.38- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 276J62 10/10/89 7.81- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 276J62 10/10/89 427.05 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 276J62 10/10/89 2.00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 276J62 10/10/89 25.80 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276J62 10/10/89 4,859.06 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276J62 10/10/89 2,568.14 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 276J62 10/10/89 10.80 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 276J62 10/10/89 282.84 JOHNSON'WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MAN AL 276J62 10/10/89 3.60 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MAN AL 276J62 10/10/89 5.20 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MAN AL 276J62 10/10/89 444.85 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MAN AL 276J62 10/10/89 2,110.40 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MAN AL 276J62 10/10/89 10.57 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MAN AL 276J62 276J62 10/10/89 10/10/89 .80 2.40 JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MAN MANI�AL AL 276J62 10/10/89 570.90 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MAN�AL 276J62 10/10/89 1,370.96 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MAN AL 276J62 10/10/89 32.03- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MAN AL 276J62 10/10/89 10.40 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MAN AL 276J62 10/10/89 27.60 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MAN AL 276362 10/10/89 47.50 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MAN AL 276J62 10/10/89 820.07 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MAN AL 276J62 10/10/89 640:15 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MAN AL 276J62 10/10/89 777.81 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MAN AL 276J62 10/10/89 16.80 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 �50- 4628 - 862 -86 MAN MAN AL AL 276J62 276J62 10/10/89 10/10/89 6.80 8.51- JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MAN AL 14,753.09 * * * * ** * ** CKS 276P20 10/10/89 5.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50 -4628- 822 -82 MAN AL 276P20 10/10/89 224.65 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MAN AL 276P20 10/10/89 99.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MAN AL 276P20 10/10/89 3.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50 -4628- 842 -84 MAN AL 276P20 10/10/89 50.00 PAUSTIS & SONS MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 MAN AL 381.65 * * * * ** * ** CKS 276P82 10/10/89 .88- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MAN AL 276P82 10/10/89 14.26- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MAN AL 276P82 10/10/89 9.37- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MAN AL 276P82 10/10/89 44.12 712.92 PRIOR WINE PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50- 4628- 842 -84 MAN MAN AL AL 276P82 276P82 10/10/89 10/10/89 468.49 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MAN AL 276P82 10/10/89 134.65 PRIOR WINE MIX 50- 4632- 842 -84 MAN MAN AL AL 276P82 10/10/89 36.21 PRIOR WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 862 -86 1,371.88 * * * * ** * ** -CKS •fr/ `..J 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 09 -30 -89 PAGE 17 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 276Q16 10/10/89 2.58- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 10.32- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 .51- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 23.00- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 .43- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 8.32- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 1.34 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 8.32- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 1.34 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 8.32 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 2.58- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 1.79- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 .34- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 55.42- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 1.34- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 .34 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 .34- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 1.15- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 1.52- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 2.58- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 8.56- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 15.93- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 .17- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 1,150.09 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 89.70 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 2,770.87 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 796.97 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 43.00 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 1,030.85 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 257.50 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 51.75 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 257.50 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 34.50 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 67.23 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 67.23- QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 828.90 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 34.50 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 828.90 -838 -:g- QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 34.50- QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 67.23- QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 114.75 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 828.90- QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 257.50 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 852.60 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 152.65 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 276Q16 10/10/89 17.25 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86. MANUAL 8,505.29 * "- * * * * ** * ** -CKS 276T49 10/10/89 29.95 TOW DISTRIBUTING 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 29.95 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS Ad 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 09 -30 -89 PAGE 18 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 278M98 10/10/89 105.86 MINNEGASCO HEAT 10- 4254 - 440 -44 MANUAL 278M98 10/10/89 16.39 MINNEGASCO HEAT 10- 4254- 520 -52 MANUAL 278M98 10/10/89 124.15 MINNEGASCO HEAT 10- 4254 - 540 -54 MANUAL 278M98 10/10/89 132.36 MINNEGASCO HEAT 10- 4254 - 646 -64 MANUAL 278M98 10/10/89 22.00 MINNEGASCO HEAT 23- 4254 - 612 -61 MANUAL 278M98 10/10/89 40.86 MINNEGASCO HEAT 27- 4254 - 662 -66 MANUAL 278M98 10/10/89 24.82 MINNEGASCO HEAT 27- 4254 - 664 -66 MANUAL 278M98 10/10/89 3.00 MINNEGASCO HEAT 27- 4254 - 667 -66 MANUAL 278M98 10/10/89 915.81 MINNEGASCO HEAT 28- 4254 - 702 -70 MANUAL 278M98 10/10/89 287.42 MINNEGASCO HEAT 30- 4254 - 782 -78 MANUAL 278M98 10/10/89 56.44 MINNEGASCO HEAT 40- 4254 - 801 -80 MANUAL 278M98 10/10/89 378.57 MINNEGASCO HEAT 40- 4254 - 803 -80 MANUAL 278M98 10/10/89 19.60 MINNEGASCO HEAT 50- 4254 - 841 -84 MANUAL 278M98 10/10/89 25.22 MINNEGASCO HEAT 50-4254- 861 -86 MANUAL 2,152.50 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 278N16 10/10/89 956.58 NSP POWER 10- 4252 - 301 -30 MANUAL 278N16 10/10/89 12,352.72 NSP POWER 10- 4252 - 321 -30 MANUAL 278N16 10/10/89 12,352.72- NSP POWER 10- 4252 - 321 -32 MANUAL 278N16 10/10/89 12,352.72 NSP POWER 10- 4252 - 321 -32 MANUAL 278N16 10/10/89 10,700.28 NSP POWER 10- 4252 - 322 -30 MANUAL 278N16 10/10/89 2,623.66 NSP POWER 10- 4252 - 330 -30 MANUAL 278N16 10/10/89 2,036.32 NSP POWER 10- 4252 - 375 -30 MANUAL 278N16 10/10/89 976.03 NSP POWER 10- 4252 - 440 -44 MANUAL 278N16 10/10/89 38.93 NSP POWER 10- 4252- 460 -46 MANUAL 278N16 10/10/89 1,641.32 NSP POWER 10- 4252 - 520 -52 MANUAL 278N16 10/10/89 2,054.31 NSP POWER 10- 4252 - 540 -54 MANUAL. 278N16 10/10/89 3,333.56 NSP POWER 10- 4252 - 646 -64 MANUAL 278N16 10/10/89 484.96 NSP POWER 23- 4252 - 612 -61 MANUAL 278N16 10/10/89 979.36 NSP POWER 26- 4252 - 682 -68 MANUAL 278N16 10/10/89 249.50 NSP POWER 27- 4252 - 664 -66 MANUAL 278N16 10/10/89 621.26 NSP POWER 27- 4252 - 667 -66 MANUAL 278N16 10/10/89 621.26- NSP POWER 27- 4252 - 667 -66 MANUAL 278N16 10/10/89 621.29 NSP POWER 27- 4252 - 667 -66 MANUAL 278N16 10/10/89 97.18 NSP POWER 28- 4252 - 702 -70 MANUAL 278N16 10/10/89 205.55 NSP POWER 29- 4252 - 722 -72 MANUAL 278N16 10/10/89 7,473.00 NSP POWER 30- 4252 - 782 -78 MANUAL 278N16 10/10/89 2,826.64 NSP POWER 40- 4252- 801 -80 MANUAL 278N16 10/10/89 24,814.05 NSP POWER 40- 4252 - 803 -80 MANUAL 278N16 10/10/89 119.56 NSP POWER 40- 4252 - 804 -80 MANUAL 278N16 10/10/89 116.71 NSP POWER 41- 4252 - 902 -90 MANUAL 278N16 10/10/89 63.73 NSP POWER 41- 4252 - 902 -90 MANUAL 278N16 10/10/89 739.09 NSP POWER 50- 4252 - 821 -82 MANUAL 278N16 10/10/89 1,237.35 NSP POWER 50- 4252 - 841 -84 MANUAL 278N16 10/10/89 553.23 NSP POWER 50- 4252 - 861 -86 MANUAL 77,294.91 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 278U27 10/10/89 3,813.70 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL 278U27 10/10/89 194.85 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 622 -62 MANUAL 278U27 10/10/89 103.46 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 628 -62 MANUAL _ �.. .«•2r � i :.!:- i%it'r^1�aW�n�M11!. 'kF. + fi TP`�P _ .... ., v _ . IPi. C _ — r., .. Pi'RC•' .�; If+y" .1, .l TAW vw on 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 09 -30 -89 PAGE 19 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 278U27 10/10/89 20.88 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 646 -64 MANUAL 278U27 10/10/89 168.93 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 23- 4256 - 612 -61 MANUAL 278U27 10/10/89 11.70 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 26- 4256 - 682 -68 MANUAL 278U27 10/10/89 52.37 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 27- 4256 - 662 -66 MANUAL 278U27 10/10/89 127.64 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 27- 4256- 667 -66 MANUAL 278U27 10/10/89 140.66 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 28- 4256- 702 -70 MANUAL 278U27 10/10/89 318.27 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 30- 4256 - 782 -78 MANUAL 278U27 10/10/89 104.19 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 40- 4256- 801 -80 MANUAL 278U27 10/10/89 472.11 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 40- 4256 - 803 -80 MANUAL 278U27 10/10/89 153.54 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 50- 4256 - 821 -82 MANUAL 278U27 10/10/89 181.25 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 50- 4256 - 841 -84 MANUAL 278U27 10/10/89 129.54 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 50- 4256 - 861 -86 MANUAL 5,993.09 * * * * ** * * * -CKS 440,334.47 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 1,645.41 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER , 3,381.77 FUND 26 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUND 20,339.46 FUND 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND 7,749.35 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND 617.21 FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND 18,236.99 FUND 30 TOTAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 70,162.69 FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND 180.44 FUND 41 TOTAL STORM SEWER UTILITY 243,921.68 24a 93 69 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 177,850.40 FUND 60 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 984,419.87* TOTAL