Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-11-20_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 20, 1989 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL I. APPROVAL OF HRA MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 6, 1989 II. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL AWARD PRESENTATION - 7th Annual Minnesota Golf Tournament for Physically Disabled COMMENDATION - Edina High School 1989 -90 Girls' Tennis Team I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Council member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of the Regular Council Meeting of November 6, 1989 III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Second Reading 1. Ordinance No. 804 - Regulating Plats and Subdivisions 2. Ordinance No..825 -A30 - Requiring Larger Minimum Lot Areas and Dimensions for Certain Lots in the R -1 District B. First Reading 1. Ordinance No. 825 -A33 - Requiring Increased Sideyard Setbacks for For Lots in the R -1 District Over 85 Feet Wide * C. Reprogramming of Year %IV CDBG Funds - From Assistance to Low and Moderate Income Housing Project to Removal of Architectural Barriers Project IV. PUBLIC HEARING ON STREET VACATION Affidavits of Notice by.Clerk. Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Vacation of Old County Road Right of Way - Leo Evans Property - Generally located east of Vernon Avenue and east of Olinger Road (Contd from 11/6/89) V. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS VI. AWARD OF BIDS * A. Collection of Garbage/Refuse - City Properties (Contd from 11/6/89) * (Continue to 12/4/89) * B. Revolving Entrance Door - Golf Dome * C. Emergency Exit Door - Golf Dome * D. Ice Rink Resurfacing Unit * E. Park and Recreation Activities Calendar * F. Art Center Improvement * Agenda Edina City Council November 20, 1989 Page 2 VII. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS - ) A. School Board Strategic Planning Retreat - Member Paulus Nov B. Approval of Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of 11/14/89 Mon C. Braemar Golf League Policies Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room D. I -494 Project Update 18 E. Proposed Hennepin County Resolution - Composting F. Set 1990 Council Meeting Dates Mon G. Set Date - 1990 Board of Review (4/23/90) VIII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES IX. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL X. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS XI. FINANCE * A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 11/20/89, Total $1,832,548.27; Confirmation of Payment of Claims dated 10/31/89, Total $909,270.21 SCHEDULE UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Wed Nov 22 Special Council Meeting with Heritage 3:30 p.m. Mgrs Conf Rm Preservation Bd Thurs Nov 23) - ) THANKSGIVING HOLIDAYS - City Hall Closed Fri Nov 24) Mon Dec 4 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Mon Dec 18 Joint Council /Park Board Meeting 6:00 p.m. Mgrs Conf Rm Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Room Mon Dec 25 CHRISTMAS DAY - City Hall Closed .�W: . MINUTES EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NOVEMBER 6, 1989 Answering rollcall were Commissioners Rice, Smith and Richards. Commissioner Kelly arrived at 7:03 p.m. Chairman Richards announced that Commissioner Paulus was absent because she was representing the Edina City Council at an Edina School District Strategic Planning Retreat. MINUTES of the HRA Meeting of October 16, 1989 were approved as submitted by motion of Commissioner Rice, seconded by Commissioner Smith. Ayes: Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. AMENDMENT OF CONTRACT FOR DEED AND AMENDMENT TO REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - CENTENNIAL LAKES APPROVED Executive Director Hughes stated that South Edina Development Corporation (SED), the Centennial Lakes Developer, has the option to buy land from the HRA pursuant to the Redevelopment Contracts for Centennial Lakes. To maintain that option SED must, among other requirements, make all payments to Hedberg under the Hedberg Contract for Deed. An interest payment in the amount of $801,797.22 is now due and SED will be making that payment. SED has also worked out an agreement (Second Amendment to Contract for Deed) with Hedberg to allow deferral of the interest payment due October 13, 1990 in the same amount (Deferred Interest). If deferred, that amount would be added to principal. The agreement also reduces the amount of interest to be paid for releases of land from interest on all unpaid principal to interest only on the principal amount paid for the release. Director Hughes said that he and Attorney Erickson have been discussing this matter with SED. They have concluded that the reduction in the interest required Ito be paid for any release is a benefit to the HRA and the Foundation, and that deferral of the Deferred Interest and addition thereof to the principal is not adverse to the HRA or the Foundation if SED agrees to pay any interest on other Deferred Interest while it is the holder of the option. SED has agreed in a proposed amendment (Third Amendment) to the HRA Contract to pay any interest that would ultimately be due on the Deferred Interest without reimbursement by the HRA. Staff would recommend approval of the Second Amendment to Contract for Deed and the Third Amendment to the HRA Contract. Commissioner Smith asked if the HRA would have a liability if the interest is never paid. Director Hughes explained that the agreement with SED provides that, if SED defaults on the contract and then the HRA were to step in and make the payments current and sell to another developer, the HRA would be obliged to reimburse SED for any payments that they had made to date. He said this would not put the HRA at any greater liability than it presently faces except for the interest on interest. Commissioner Smith asked what has changed to bring this about and how this would affect any prior guarantees. Director Hughes said that the principal change is the office market. SED does not see the office development occurring in the near term due to market conditions. They are buying some time with this deferral hoping the market will loosen up. SED has guaranteed payment in lieu of taxes, e.g. they will make payments on the first office building starting in 1991 whether or not that office building has been built. Commissioner Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:, RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF VARIOUS DOCUMENTS BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "BRA "), as follows: 1. Recitals. The HRA and the Edina City Council have previously approved a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.421, subdivision or 15, designated as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, and have approved various amendments thereto (as so amended, the "Redevelopment Plan "). Acting pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan, the HRA has acquired certain land in the area included in the Redevelopment Plan pursuant to a Contract for Deed dated as of October 3, 1989, with John Q. Hedberg and Kenneth N. Anderson, as personal representatives of the Estate of Fred Q. Hedberg (the "Contract for Deed "), and the BRA has entered into an Amended and Restated Land Sale Agreement and Contract for Private Redevelopment between the BRA and Foundation dated as of September 30, 1988(the "Agreement "). In connection with the transactions contemplated by the Contract for Deed and the Agreement, it is now proposed that a Second Amendment to Contract for Deed, and an Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement be executed and delivered by the HRA, both as presented to and reviewed by the Board. 2. Authorization for Execution and Delivery of Documents. Any two officers of the BRA are authorized and directed to execute said Second Amendment to Contract for Deed and said Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement with such changes and modifications as may be approved by the Executive Director and Attorney for the HRA. The execution of such instruments and agreements by any two officers of the BRA shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents by the BRA in accordance with this Resolution. Dated as of the 6th day of November, 1989. Chairman Executive Director Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Commissioner Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. RESOLUTION ADOPTED CONVEYING PHASE IV CENTENNIAL LAKES CONDOMINIUMS Director Hughes recalled that several months ago the Centennial Lakes condominium developer, Laukka Development, presented the concept of constructing a condominium building designed for more affluent purchasers on the Phase IV site. On October 11, 1989, a letter was received from Laukka Development stating that they will not proceed with the construction of this semi - luxury condominium building due to market response. As such, Laukka proposes to develop the Phase IV site with a building identical to that under construction on Phase III. This building is proposed to contain 42 units, most of which would be served by an elevator. As with Phase III, the average sale price of the Phase IV condominiums will be somewhat higher than Phases I and _II. This increase in sale price is principally due to the cost of the elevator. Due to the increase, fewer units will be affordable to moderate income purchasers. Based on the current policy of limiting second mortgages to units selling for $90,000 or less, 13 units in Phase IV will qualify for second mortgage assistance. As with Phase III, second'mortgage funds that would normally be allocated to Phase IV will instead be reallocated to other buildings in the project to assist moderate income purchasers. Staff would recommend adoption of a resolution authorizing execution of documents conveying the Phase IV condominium lot to the condominium developer. Chairman Richards said he was concerned that after completion of all phases there might be money in the second mortgage pot that is not used. Larry Laukka, developer, commented that as the program was developed originally there was $193,000 in mortgage money that went into the second mortgage pool. At this point buildings 1, 2 and 3 have been marketed and there is about $100,000 left in the pool, with approximately 25 units eligible. Mr. Laukka said he did not sense that there would be any money left over in the second mortgage pool and that it was his obligation to see that all money in the pool is used. Mr. Laukka said that the statistics indicate that of the first 73 sales in the development, 82.19% of those fall within the median income guidelines, although not all are eligible for second mortgage money. He observed that the program now is working and that by putting building 4 back on line as it was planned initially does not problem the development. Building 5 will be a non - elevator building and that will provide more housing units that fall into the $90,000 guideline. At this time Building 6 is also planned to be a non - elevator building. Demographics for the project are also following consistently with the Edinborough project in which 15% of the 392 buyers were "empty nesters" (people over 55). Mr. Laukka said that prior to conveyance of Phases V and VI the Council would have the chance for input concerning those buildings. At that time the status of the development would be reviewed in terms of money available in the second mortgage pool and as to reaching the median income level as the program was designed. Commissioner Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RATIFYING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF VARIOUS DOCUMENTS BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "BRA "), as follows: 1. Recitals. The HRA and the Edina City Council have previously approved a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.421, subdivision 15, designated as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, and have approved various amendments thereto (as so amended, the "Redevelopment Plan "). Acting pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan, the HRA has acquired certain land in the area included in the Redevelopment Plan and it has been proposed that the ERA sell and transfer a portion of such land to the East Edina Housing Foundation (the "Foundation "), pursuant to a Land Sale Agreement by and between the HRA and the Foundation (the "Agreement "). -By a resolution adopted March 7, 1988, the HRA approved the form of the Agreement and authorized any two officers of the HRA to execute and deliver the Agreement on behalf of the HRA with such modifications as were deemed appropriate and approved by the Chairman and the Executive Director of the HRA. Pursuant to such authorization the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the HRA executed and delivered the Agreement dated on or as of March 14, 1988. Subsequently, by resolution dated September 12, 1988, the BRA approved execution and delivery by any two officers of the BRA, on behalf of the HRA, of an Amended and Restated Land Sale Agreement and Contract for Private Redevelopment between the BRA and Foundation with such modifications as the attorney for the BRA and Executive Director of the HRA should approve (the "Amended Agreement "). Pursuant to such authorization the Chairman and Secretary of the ERA executed and delivered the Amended Agreement dated on or as of September 30, 1988. In connection with the transactions contemplated by the Amended Agreement, it is now proposed that Phase IV of the Condominium Development be commenced on the property described on Exhibit A hereto (the "Phase IV Condominium Property ") and that the Phase IV Condominium Property be conveyed pursuant to the Amended Agreement and on the same terms and conditions as the Phase III Condominium Property was conveyed with such changes and modifications as may be approved by the Executive Director and the Attorney to the HRA, including those resulting from the proposed addition of an elevator and the proposed sale of units without the use of second mortgages. 2. Authorization for Execution and Delivery of Documents. Any two officers of the BRA are authorized and directed to execute such instruments and agreements as may be required'or be desirable to accomplish the conveyance of the Phase IV Condominium Property pursuant to the Amended Agreement with such changes and modifications as may be approved by the Executive Director and Attorney for the HRA. The execution of such.instruments and agreements by any two officers of the HRA shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents by the HRA in accordance with this Resolution. EXHIBIT A THE HOMES OF CENTENNIAL LAKES PHASE IV CONDOMINIUM LAND DESCRIPTION Lot 4, Block 1, THE HOMES OF CENTENNIAL LAKES, according to the recorded plat W, thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Commissioner Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Rice, Smith, Richards .Resolution adopted. BID AWARDED FOR DECK WATERPROOFING PHASES II b III CENTENNIAL LAKES CONDOMINIUMS Motion was made by Commissioner Rice for award of bid for deck waterproofing Phases II & III Centennial Lakes Condominiums to recommended low bidder, Kremer & Davis, at $19,505.00. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Ayes: Kelly, Rice, Smith, Richards There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, motion of Commissioner Kelly was seconded by Commissioner Smith for adjournment. Motion carried unanimously. Executive Director Honeywell October 17, 1989 Mayor Fred Richard, I spoke with your City Clerk in regards to having about 5 minutes at your November 20th Council Meeting.. She asked me to send you a note with con- firmation about the presentation and some background. My name is Bob Anderson and I work at Honeywell, Hopkins. For the last 7 years I have been the Chairperson that works with Sister Kenny and Braemar Golf Course. We held our 7th Annual Minnesota Golf Tournament for the Physically Disabled at Braemar on the 11th of August. It was another great success, thanks to Braemar and its super management team. The first year we had twelve players. This year there were fifty five. This increase in numbers has encouraged us to expand this to a Regional Tournament which will include Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa and Wisconsin. We already have the MGA, Minnesota Golfers Association to help with publishing the event and handling TV coverage. This Tournament is sponsored by the Sister Kenny Institute and Honeywell Underseas Division in Hopkins. We supply the Financial support, volunteers, posters, flyers, signup sheets and anything that might be needed. But without the Golf Course, we would not a Disabled Golf Tournament. Braemar hs gone out of their way to do everything to help us. They were the only ones to allow Wheelchairs and such on the course. We love working with everyone at the course and have never run into any problems. To show our appreciation and let everyone in Edina know how great the management is at ,Braemar, we would like to present a special plaque to John Valori to hang in the Club House. I hope this gives you enough background you need in helping us present this award to the Golf Course. We would like Susan Hagel, Director of Therapetic Recreation at Sister Kenny and Rick Miller, Production Administrator at Honeywell to present this award to John Valori and answer any questions you may have. If you would like additional information or answer any questions you may have, please feel free to call me at work 931 -6348 or at home 938 -1160. I look forward to seeing you November 20, 1989. Yours truly, z 04 4 Robert E. Anderson MN11 -2961 Honeywell Inc. 600 2nd St. NE Hopkins, MN 55343 UNDERSEAS SYSTEMS DIVISION ``'- _ HONEYWELL INC., 600 2nd STREET N.E., HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343, TELEPHONE 612/931-6511 M OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL NOVEMBER 6, 1989 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Rice, Smith and Mayor Richards. Mayor Richards announced that Member Paulus was representing the Council at the School District Strategic Planning Retreat. AMERICAN EDUCATION WEEK PROCLAIMED Motion of Member Smith was seconded by member Rice for adoption of the following proclamation: PROCLAMATION - AMERICAN EDUCATION WEEK WHEREAS, the citizens of our community have long recognized the historic link between education and a strong, fee nation; and WHEREAS, our public'schools have enabled generations of American families to build upon the lessons of the past to achieve the dreams of tomorrow; and WHEREAS, America's system of public education relies not only on the skills and dedication of teachers, school administrators, and education support staff, but also on the encouragement and support of the entire community, NOW, THEREFORE, I, Frederick S. Richards, serving as Mayor of the City of Edina, do hereby proclaim November 12 -18, 1989 as AMERICAN EDUCATION WEEK I urge all citizens to reaffirm their commitment to our public schools and to recognize.the critical role that learning plays in the preservation of liberty. SIGNED this 6th day of November, 1989. Motion carried unanimously. EMPLOYEES JIM KNUTSON AND BOB KOJETIN COMMENDED Manager Rosland introduced Jim Knutson and commented that he started working for the City in December of 1986 as an accountant. In January of 1988 he was promoted to the position of Assistant Finance Director. He said that Mr. Knutson has been a most valued employee and has generated most of the management reports for the Council. Manager Rosland stated that Mr. Knutson has accepted the position of Finance Director for the City of Anoka. Mayor Richards commended Mr. Knutson for his excellent work in the budgeting process. Members of the Council joined in the commendation wishing him well in his new position. Manager Rosland then introduced Bob Kojetin, noting that he was hired as a Recreation Supervisor in March of 1962, was promoted to Assistant Parks & Recreation Director and in October of 1977 became the Director of Parks and Recreation. During those years Mr. Kojetin has promoted the game of softball in Minnesota, the United States and in other countries around the world. In exchange he brought back the sport of bandy and introduced it to this country. Manager Rosland said it was his privilege to attend a ceremony on October 28 at which Mr. Kojetin was inducted into the Minnesota Softball Hall of Fame. Members of the Council joined in the commendation. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE JOINT HRA /COUNCIL MEETING AND REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 16. 1989 APPROVED Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith to approve the Minutes of the Joint HRA /Council Meeting of October 16, 1989 and the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of October 16, 1989. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. *LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR 4700 AND 4704 MERILANE Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute various separate parcels: Lot 60 and Lot 60A, ROLLING GREEN SECTION TWO and Lot 1, Block 1, GUNNAR JOHNSON'S REARRANGEMENT, Rolling Green; WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to subdivide said tracts into the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "Parcels "): Parcel A - Lot 60 and that part of Lot 60A, ROLLING GREEN SECTION TWO and that part of Lot 1, Block 1, "GUNNAR JOHNSON'S RE RRANGEMENT, Rolling Green ", according to the recorded plats thereof, which lie northerly of the following described line and its extensions: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Lot 60A; thence northwesterly along the easterly line of said Lot 60A, a distance of 17.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence southwesterly, passing through a point on the south line of said Lot 60A distant 72.00 feet westerly from said southeast corner; and said line there terminating; and Parcel B - That part of Lot 60A, ROLLING GREEN SECTION TWO and that part of Lot 1, Block 1, GUNNAR JOHNSON'S REARRANGEMENT, Rolling Green ", according to the recorded plats thereof, which lie southerly of the following described line and its extensions: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Lot 60A; thence northwesterly along the easterly line of said Lot 60A, a distance of 17.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence southwesterly, passing through a point on the south line of said Lot 60A distant 72.00 feet westerly from said southeast corner; and said line there terminating; WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance Nos. 801 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived.to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. SECOND READING FOR ORDINANCE NO. 804 (REGULATING PLATS AND SUBDIVISIONS) AND ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A30 (REQUIRING LARGER MINIMUM LOT AREAS FOR CERTAIN LOTS IN R -1 DISTRICT AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A33 (REQUIRING INCREASED SIDEYARD SETBACKS FOR CERTAIN LOTS IN R -1 DISTRICT CONTINUED TO 11120189 Planner Craig Larsen recalled that at the October 16, 1989 meeting the Council granted First Reading of the proposed Subdivision Ordinance No. 804 and related amendments to the Zoning Ordinance (Nos. 825 -A30 and 825 -A32). At the same time'the Council identified four issues requiring further consideration: 1) Mailed notice of the proposed subdivision by applicants, 2) Massing, 3) Data concerning neighborhood properties, and 4) "Shall deny" language. In addition, comments were made concerning the issue of uniformity. The argument was made that because the definition of neighborhood is a floating and changing concept, two lots side by side may have considerably different lot size minimums applicable to them and therefore the ordinance does not have "uniform regulations" as required by statute. The City Attorney has opined that the regulations are uniform in their language and application. However, the application of those regulations may cause differing results. The fact that the results differ between lots does not mean the regulations are not uniform. Therefore, he believes the ordinance does meet the statutory requirements of uniformity. However, because discrepancies can result between two lots side by side, at least in theory, a revised definition of neighborhood is recommended as follows: "Neighborhood: All lots in the Single Dwelling Unit District, as established by the Zoning Ordinance, which (i) touch, abut or adjoin any part of the proposed plat or subdivision, and (ii) are wholly or partially within 350 feet of any part of such lots and parcels which so touch, abut or adjoin the proposed plat or subdivision, except, however, that there shall be excluded from (i) and (ii) above lots used for publicly owned parks, playgrounds, athletic facilities and golf courses, and lots used for conditional uses as established by the Zoning Ordinance. If the neighborhood includes only a part of a lot, then the whole of that lot shall be included in the neighborhood. As to streets on the perimeter of the proposed plat or subdivision, the 350 feet shall be measured from the common line of the street and the proposed plat or subdivision." Planner Larsen explained that essentially what this does is remove the plat requirement from the definition so that all nearby properties would be covered by the same neighborhood definition. Graphics were presented illustrating how the revised definition would be.applied in various areas of the City.- Planner Larsen then spoke to each of the four issues summarized as follows: Mailed Notice - Add a new paragraph (3) in Sec. 10(b) after the language required to be on signs as follows: "(3) The applicant shall also give mailed notice to each owner of property within the neighborhood of the proposed plat or subdivision, as such owners and their addresses are shown on the records of the City. The notice shall advise of the plat.or subdivision, the number of lots proposed to be created, - the area, depth and width of the proposed lots and the address and phone number of the applicant." Subsequent provisions in the ordinance will then provide that the Commission shall hold a hearing upon determination by the Planner that the required mailed notice will have been mailed and the required signs will have been erected for at least 10 days prior to the hearing, but that the Commission may hold its hearing even if such notice is not given and such signs erected. Massing - The Planning Commission, on November 1, 1989, considered Zoning Ordinance amendments increasing interior side yard setbacks on certain lots. The increased setbacks would reduce the impression of massiveness by increasing the required space between new homes. The Planning Commission considered the following two approaches (current requirements are included for reference): Front Side Interior Rear Current Street Street Side Yard Yard Single Dwelling Unit 30 15 10 25 buildings on lots 75 feet or more in width Attached garage 5 Front Current Street Single Dwelling Unit 30 buildings on lots less than 75 feet in width Alternative 1 Single Dwelling Unit 30 buildings and attached garages on lots 100 feet in width or more Side Interior Street Side Yard 15 5 20 10 Rear Yard 25 35 Alternative 2 Interior Side Yard Setbacks: On lots having a lot width of 85 feet or more the minimum interior side yard setback shall be increased by one foot for each five feet, or portion thereof, that the lot width exceeds 85 feet. Graphics were presented illustrating the current setback requirements and also the alternatives. The Planning Commission and staff recommend Alternative 2 which creates a sliding scale formula for determining interior side yard setbacks. All other minimum setbacks would remain unchanged. A major concern of the Planning Commission was the potential impact of the increased minimum setbacks on existing homes. The new setback requirements could prevent or significantly alter plans for additions to existing homes. The Commission recommended that existing homes with conforming setbacks be exempt from the new requirements. New homes and total reconstructions would be subject to the new,setback requirements. Data Concerning Neighborhood Properties - Section 12 . proposes that data be obtained from a source acceptable to the Planner. This would allow staff to verify the source of information but would not necessarily require a registered land surveyor. "Shall deny" Language - The following paragraph could replace the "shall deny" language of Section 14(c) with "shall consider ". Attorney Erickson continues to favor the shall deny language. He feels that it does allow the Council sufficient latitude in judging subdivisions and is a much stronger defense against claims of discrimination or unequal treatment. "(c) In addition to the foregoing matters, the Commission, in connection with its recommendation to the Council, and the Council in determining whether to approve or disapprove a proposed plat or subdivision, shall specifically and especially consider the following matters: (1) Whether the proposed plat or subdivision complies with the policies, objectives or goals of the Comprehensive Plan. (2) Whether the proposed plat or subdivision complies with the policies, objectives, goals or requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, including, without limitation, the lot size and dimension requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, and the Flood Plain Overlay District and Heritage Preservation Overlay District of the Zoning Ordinance, as varied by variances therefore, if any, granted pursuant to the Zoning Ordinance. (3) Whether the design of the proposed plat or subdivision, or design or type of.improvements proposed to be placed thereon, may be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public. (4) Whether the proposed plat or subdivision conforms to and complies with the requirements of applicable state law. (5) Whether the proposed plat or subdivision complies with the policies, objectives, goals or requirements of this ordinance, as varied by variances therefrom if any, granted pursuant to this ordinance. Planner Larsen also directed the Council's attention to several minor additions to the proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 825 -A30 regarding larger minimum lot areas. He then asked for discussion and direction on the issues. He concluded the presentation with the recommendation that Second Reading for the Ordinances be continued to the November 20, 1989 meeting for these reasons: 1) It will allow staff to (i) incorporate changes or revisions made by the Council and (ii) review the Ordinance to insure the provisions are consistent throughout the Ordinance; and 2) It will allow time to publish notice of the Zoning Ordinance amendment on setbacks. Staff would also ask for authorization to contact some of the local builders of single family houses to review the proposed ordinances and to testify at the public hearing on November 20. Mayor Richards suggested that each of the four specific issues be discussed by the Council Members together with any comments from the audience with the intent that action on the ordinances would be continued to November 20. Mailed Notice - Member Rice proposed that there be consistent language for the mailed notice. Planner Larsen responded that staff could prepare a form to be used by the applicant in mailing the notice. Mayor Richards said that Member Paulus questioned and that he also was concerned about the provision that the Planning Commission may hold its hearing even if such notice and the required sign has not been erected. He suggested that the proponent be mandated to mail.the notice and erect the sign before the City would begin the application process. Member Smith said he concurred. Member Rice asked how staff would know that the proponent had complied. Mayor Richards suggested that the ordinance language include a provision that the proponent would have to certify that the notice had been-mailed and the sign had been erected. Michael Bolen, 5207.Doncaster Way, expressed his concern that the revised definition of neighborhood would shrink it down to properties 350 feet from a proposed subdivision and in effect would be getting away from the original plat and the rights of the original land owners within the plat. It would provide a narrow base for calculating the medians in that area and they would become meaningless. He said that it would also be a problem with regard to the mailed notice in that it would not notify the broader neighborhood. Following discussion, Mayor Richards stated that it was the consensus of the Council that the language should require the applicant to certify that the notice had been mailed and the sign was erected before the application would be processed for public hearing. Massing - Member Smith spoke to the Planning Commission's recommendation that existing homes with conforming setbacks be exempt from the new requirements and that new homes or total reconstruction would be subject thereto. He commented that there would then be two standards regarding setbacks in the community. Planner Larsen said the Planning Commission thought it important that we not prevent people from constructing additions to existing homes. Member Rice raised the question that if existing homes were grandfathered in that it be only for a reasonable period of time. Mayor Richards argued against grandfathering because it would not address the massing issue and pointed out that the Council would have the power to grant a variance from the requirements for any future case. Member Kelly stated she would support that. Michael Bolen said that there is nothing in the ordinance that would address the covenants and the character and symmetry of the original plat. He suggested that, as matter of policy, the Council might want to reserve the right to consider those matters if they felt it was in the best interests of the neighborhood in order to preserve values. He implied that granting of variances would effect the character and symmetry of neighborhoods. Member Rice asked what the restrictions were on hard surface coverage and height for single family homes. Planner Larsen answered that lot coverage is limited to 25% and that the maximum height is 30 feet measured at the front of the house. Data - Mayor Richards stated that staff has addressed the issue by allowing applicants to supply data as to adjoining properties without being required to incur the expense of a registered land surveyor. Tim Keane, Larkin Hoffman, said he was appearing on behalf of Steven Utne, 5257 Lochloy Drive. Mr. Keane commented that the requirement to provide the computation as to size and dimensions of all lots within the defined neighborhood would put an extraordinary burden on an applicant. As an alternative, he suggested that when an application is triggered that could be a function of City staff. He said that the City has most of this information on file and that staff would be reviewing it as a matter of course to confirm dimensions and lot area. "Shall Deny" Language - Mayor Richards observed that alternative language has been drafted to replace the "shall deny" language with "shall consider" as it relates to matters in judging subdivisions. Planner Larsen said that those are elements that have gone into all Council decisions on subdivisions in the past. He reiterated that Attorney Erickson still believes strongly in the shall deny language and feels that it gives the Council latitude in making its decisions. Tim Keane suggested that the language be offered as guiding rather than mandatory and would also include the standard for median finding of the lot area, width and depth. He said it would be sufficient that it guide the Council and the Planning Commission in their findings. A strict application of finding of the lot area, width and depth would have a cumulative effect of being prohibitive in the consideration of any subdivision of an existing or in -fill lot. For pie shaped lots regardless of depth or area in consideration of the surrounding neighborhood, it would be practically impossible to have that lot meet the finding of the median width. Mr. Keane said that the ordinance would be applying a new and different standard to an in -fill subdivision or the creation of a lot in an existing neighborhood. That new standard would be that the lot would have to be at least as large, as wide and as deep as the median of all other lots in the neighborhood. He said he differed with the new standard in that it would not uniformly apply to all those similarly situated within a district, only those who wished to subdivide a lot. Mr. Keane concluded by asking, that if it was sufficient when the subdivision was originally approved that the minimum standards were acceptable for that neighborhood, why now increase them to the median as the new standard for that neighborhood. Michael Bolen commented that if the "shall deny" language is changed to "shall consider" it might be wise to include the factor of character and symmetry of the neighborhood for Council consideration in making its decision. He said he felt that we would be losing sight of what people relied on when they purchased and developed their properties. Member Kelly said that she would prefer the original "shall deny" language as recommended by Attorney Erickson. Member Rice said he was of the opposite viewpoint and that he did not think the Council should give up its prerogatives. Member Smith said that at this point he was unable to understand the differences. Mayor Richards said he agreed with Member Rice on this issue. With regard to the massing issue /setbacks, Member Smith said that he would like some history on the City's prior application of two standards and the transition of grandfathering in to aid him in a decision. Member Kelly asked for information as to how this would affect the corridor area of York and Xerxes Avenues where there are relatively small lots with one car garages. Planner Larsen responded that as written now the new setback requirements would only affect lots over 85 feet in width. Mayor Richards commented that the moratorium has been in effect for a long time and that the Council should move forward and act on the ordinances. Member Rice made a motion to continue the hearings on Ordinance No. 804 Regulating Plats and Subdivisions, Ordinance No. 825 -A30 Requiring Larger Minimum Lot Areas for Certain Lots in R -1 District and Ordinance No. 825 -A33 Requiring Increased Sideyard Setbacks in R -1 District to November 20, 1989. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. NO ACTION TAKEN ON SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A32 (TO ALLOW PRIVATE CLUBS IN THE PC -1 COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Planner Larsen recalled that the Council had granted First Reading of Ordinance No. 825 -A32 at its meeting of October 16, 1989. The amendment would allow private clubs that do not exceed 2,500 square feet of gross floor area to locate in the PC -1 District. Staff would recommend Second Reading and adoption of the ordinance amendment. Member Rice asked if the amendment would allow other non - profit private clubs other than the Edina American Legion to move into the PC -1 Districts. Planner Larsen responded that by zoning requirements it would allow them to locate in the three PC -1 Districts, e.g. Valley View/Wooddale,.44th /France and 70th /Cahill. Member Smith expressed concern that, although'the amendment would accommodate the Edina American Legion, it could open up those areas to privates clubs that are not there now. Member Rice asked if the ordinance language could be more specific. He said that, although he was sympathetic with the request of the Legion, he was somewhat concerned about what might happen in the future if the amendment were passed. Planner Larsen said that by including the square footage requirement it would limit the size of the private club which is consistent with the way other uses are controlled in other zoning districts. There are also other controls in place such as those on liquor and rents which should prevent a full scale American Legion or V.F.W. Post from locating in these districts. Member Rice also raised the question that private clubs are not defined in the ordinance. Member Smith observed that the Edina American Legion now has an on -sale beer license and that he would not like to see that in the PC -1 Districts. He said that he could not support amending the Zoning Ordinance solely for the reason that the Edina American Legion wanted to relocate to the 70th /Cahill area. Manager Rosland commented that the Legion has been part of the Edina community for many years and that there is empathy for that organization and asked if they could be grandfathered in. Planner Larsen said that a use variance cannot be granted and suggested that staff attempt to further refine the amendment language to make it more limiting. Following further discussion, Mayor Richards said that there did not appear to be support for a 4/5 vote to adopt the ordinance amendment. No formal action was taken. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED TO 11/20/89 ON VACATION OF OLD COUNTY ROAD RIGHT OF WAY (LEO EVANS PROPERTY): REQUEST REFERRED TO STAFF FOR RECOMMENDATION Affidavits of of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Engineer Fran Hoffman explained that the request for vacation of the Old County Road right of way on the Leo Evans property, generally located east of Vernon Avenue and Olinger Road, is unusual because the City has no interest of record in the subject land. He explained that the property owner involved is attempting to clarify any interest that the City may have in property that'has a description therein of the "Old County Road" or "Old Eden Prairie Road " -. The request is to vacate any right of way interests that the City may have for public roads except for existing right of way as related to Olinger Road and Vernon Avenue. Staff would recommend vacating right of way interests that the City may have in the subject parcel with reservation of the existing utility easement for sanitary sewer. James Ostendorf, 9001 E. Bloomington Freeway, stated that he was the attorney representing Leo Evans, proponent, in the registration of title to the subject property. He explained that the Examiner of Titles raised the issue of the interest of the City of Edina in the road described as "Old County Road" or "Old Eden Prairie Road" on the property. He said he had researched this matter with the State of Minnesota and Hennepin County. Maps going back to 1918 indicated that the subject road was not a County road. Mr. Ostendorf advised that he had letters from the State of Minnesota and Hennepin County disclaiming any interest in the road and had therefore concluded that the City of Edina may have an interest therein. He noted the following implications: 1) Road could have been abandoned, 2) A quit claim deed could be obtained, or 3) Vacation.of the road could be granted. As to abandonment, he said that is difficult because there seems to be no record as to who owned the road. As to a quit claim deed, it has been contested as to who owns the underlying property to the road. He explained that part of this property lying south of the centerline of the road was initially conveyed out in about 1920. In 1930 everything north of the north line of the road was conveyed to a particular individual who claims ownership of the north half of the road. Mr. Ostendorf concluded by saying that he would like to bring this matter before the Examiner of Titles for a decision. The vacation by the City of Edina of any interest in the right of way for the road would expedite that process. Mayor Richards raised the question, if indeed the City of Edina owns or has an interest in the road, why.the City should give up its public interest without compensation. Mr. Ostendorf said that apparently there is an easement and the issue would be whether or not that has been used by the City. He noted that there is a curb cut at the corner of Olinger Road/Vernon Avenue and that in the past there has been dumping on the property. Engineer Hoffman explained that the City's policy has been that if the City is using or has an interest in an easement the recommendation would be that it be retained. In this case, discussion with the City Attorney indicated: 1) Uncertainty that the City has an interest in the road, 2) The City is not using the property today as a road, and 3) Normal process would be vacating the easement for roadway if the City is not using it or has a need for it. Member Smith made a motion to continue the hearing on the request for vacation of the Old County Road right of way to November 20, 1989 and that the matter be referred to the City Attorney for review of facts and recommendation. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *AWARD OF BID FOR COLLECTION OF GARBAGE/REFUSE FOR CITY PROPERTIES CONTINUED TO 11120189 Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith to continue award of bid for collection of garbage /refuse for City properties to November 20, 1989. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR VAN VALKENBURG PARR LIGHTING Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for Van Valkenburg Park lighting to recommended low bidder, CSI Electric, Inc., at $129,500.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR FENCE REPLACEMENT - BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE DRIVING RANGE Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for fence replacement - Braemar Golf Course Driving Range to recommended low bidder, Crowley Company, Inc., at $9,435.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR FIVE GOLF CARTS Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for five (5) golf carts to recommended low bidder, Versatile Vehicles, Inc., at $14,100.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. BIDS REJECTED FOR DRY ELECTROSTATIC TRANSFER COPIER: TO BE REBID Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith to reject all bids for a dry electrostatic transfer copier and directing that the copier be re -bid. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR REFRIGERATION - GRANDVIEW LIQUOR STORE Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for refrigeration at the Grandview Liquor Store to recommended low bidder, Merit Supply, at $12,281.40. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED ON BEER LICENSE FEES Pursuant to due notice given, a public hearing was conducted to consider increasing the fees for beer licenses in accordance with Chapter 104 (H.F. 1405), 1989 Legislative Session. Mayor Richards called for public comment on the proposed license fee increase. No comment or objection was heard and no written objections had been received hereto. Member Smith moved approval of the proposed increase in beer licenses as presented. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. RECYCLING PROGRAM UPDATE PRESENTED Janet Chandler, Recycling Coordinator, noted that at the October 2, 1989 meeting there was some dissatisfaction expressed by the Council concerning certain aspects of the Recycling Program, in particular the issue of container placement. It was also reported that the drivers were not returning the containers to the garage as per the contract with BFI, Inc. despite the fact that this information was publicized through the recycling pamphlet, articles in the Edina Sun - Current and television. Coordinator Chandler reported that staff had met with BFI representatives to work out a plan that has improved the situation. Subsequently, portions of each of the five recycling routes were checked out by the Coordinator and the BFI Supervisor. The BFI drivers were again instructed on the correct procedure and were told that they would be observed from time to time. From the observations made, it was concluded that the drivers' performance improved considerably during the month of October. Spot checks will continue in the future. Recycling program information and reminders about placement of garbage, recyclables and yard waste will be included in the Edina newsletter scheduled for distribution to each household in January. Coordinator Chandler also explained the procedure for missed pickups and late set -outs of recyclables. BFI has also been working to improve telephone courtesy to residents who call the Recycling Hot Line. In conclusion, Coordinator Chandler stated that the Recycling Program is growing; participation and tonnage data show a steady rise.. She reported that the first check has been received from Hennepin County for funding of the Recycling Program, including the container rebate. She then reviewed a chart showing tonnage and participation percentages. John Moorland, BFI, reported that he has worked with the individuals who are answering the Recyling Hot Line to improve the manner in which calls to BFI are being handled. BFI now has a fairly stable group of route drivers whose performance has improved with regard to container placement /return. Mr. Moorland said that he was pleased with the tonnage which has increased each month and that for the month of October total tonnage was 293 tons. Member Smith asked if BFI was experiencing any difficulties in marketing the recyclables. Mr. Moorland said that everything is, moving out and that none is being stockpiled. Currently, BFI is working with a company that is concentrating on processing and they are going directly to the market with the rest of the materials. He said BFI is having difficulty in keeping up with the volumes needed to meet contract levels. They are also working on regional marketing so that they have backup which is critical to recycling. Member Rice commented that before the change from daylight savings time to central daylight time the recycling truck was coming to his house before daylight which meant that residents would have to place out their recyclables in the dark. He also questioned the driver's habits with regard to traffic safety. Mr. Moorland said that drivers should not be starting their routes before daylight. He said he the drivers have been given guidelines which they are supposed to follow and that he would appreciate knowing immediately about any safety violations. Member Kelly said that residents have raised the question of the need for pickup every week. Mr. Moorland said that many residents do not have enough recyclables to put out every week. However, participation and tonnage levels are generally greatly increase with weekly pickup. Member Kelly suggested that information be communicated to the residents. Mr. Moorland added that every other week pickup is very difficult to administer. Mayor Richards commented that, from his observations and from the tonnage reports, a good job is being done with the Recyling Program. Member Smith asked how Edina compared with other cities and also how the yard waste would be handled next year. Coordinator Chandler said that only Bloomington and St. Louis Park have a higher participation rate than Edina. Although Hennepin County has recently had some problems with compost sites the County has assured that the compost program will continue next year. RESOLUTION ADOPTED IN SUPPORT OF COUNTY FUNDING FOR STOREFRONT/YOUTH ACTION AND SOUTH HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES COUNCIL Jeff Workinger, appeared on behalf of Storefront/Youth Action, and expressed the concerns they and other human service agencies supported by Hennepin County are currently undergoing. Due to recent legislation, Hennepin County has been subjected to very tight funding limits for these programs. The result is that Hennepin County has proposed cuts of approximately $103,000 from Storefront/Youth Action's budget. Losing this vital source of funding could potentially force a reduction of services in Edina. On behalf of Storefront/Youth Action and other agencies who are receiving County funding and providing human services in Edina, Mr. Workinger said he would recommend that the Council adopt a resolution urging the Hennepin County Commissioners to continue their support until a method for evaluating and prioritizing the quality and level of services can be put in place.' Mayor Richards said he would support the recommendation. He informed the Council Members that he had made an appearance with Mr. Workinger on October 31, 1989 to let the County know how important the City views Storefront/Youth's program and what they have done for the City over the past 12 years. Mayor Richards said the same is true for South Hennepin Human Services Council. He said he appreciated the dilemma that the County is in but that it is a timing issue inasmuch as the City of Edina has already gone through its budget process for the coming year. Following discussion, Member Kelly introduced the following resolutions and moved their adoption for forwarding to the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners: RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF STOREFRONT/YOUTH ACTION WHEREAS, Hennepin County is considering total elimination of their support in the amount of $103,876 for Storefront/Youth Action's Youth Counseling Program, and WHEREAS, during 1989 to date the Youth Counseling Program has served 561 City of Edina youth and in 1989 has provided over 4,000 hours of counseling and education to these young people and their families, and WHEREAS, there is no effective alternative service for these people, and WHEREAS, this type of early intervention in young lives actually saves in terms of human resources, as well as reducing future costs of law enforcement, chemical abuse treatment and institutional costs of Edina and to Hennepin County, and WHEREAS, discontinuing this service will ultimately result in substantial' increases in human and financial costs to society; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina requests the Hennepin County Commissioners to continue to appropriate the current level of funding necessary to Storefront/Youth Action in 1990. ADOPTED this 6th day of November, 1989. RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF SOUTH HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES COUNCIL WHEREAS, the Hennepin County 1990 proposed budget eliminates all funding for Community Planning and Coordination and Citizen Participation Process to the Human Services Councils, including South Hennepin Human Services Council ( SHHSC); and WHEREAS, elimination of these funds will significantly impair the function of SHHSC which is the sole entity charged with responsibility of human services planning and coordination between and amount the four cities in the South Hennepin area; and WHEREAS, elimination of these funds will totally dissolve the formal process for solicitation of citizen input as to guidelines to determine priorities in area human service funding; and WHEREAS, SHHSC has in the past shown itself to play an important and beneficial role in human services and development and delivery; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina requests the Hennepin County Commissioners to continue to appropriate the current level of funding necessary to SHHSC in 1990. ADOPTED this 6th day of November, 1989. Motion for adoption of the resolutions was seconded by Member Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolutions adopted. DATE OF 11/22/89 SET FOR MEETING WITH HERITAGE PRESERVATION _BOARD REGARDING ST. PATRICK CHURCH SITE Manager Rosland recalled that the Council had asked staff to suggest a date for a meeting of the Council with the Heritage Preservation Board and representatives of the Historical Society concerning the St. Patrick Church site at 70th Street /Cahill Road. He said the proposed date was November 15. Following discussion as to availability, the Council Members informally agreed to meet with the Heritage Preservation Board /Historical Society on Wednesday, November 22 at 3:30 p.m. COUNCIL PARTY FOR EDINAMITE AUCTION DETERMINED Mayor Richards proposed the following Council party to be auctioned at EDINAMITE on November 18: Five Course Dinner Party for ten people at the Mayor's home with a riddle to be solved with each course. For each riddle solved the bidder would get back 10% of the amount bid. Member Rice stated that a private source would match whatever is bid for the dinner with the money to be designated for the Edina Art Center. Following discussion, the Council informally agreed to the dinner party as suggested by Mayor Richards. (Member Kelly left the meeting during discussion of the next agenda item.) SOUTHDALE REQUEST FOR PRIVATE FUNDING OF PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES DISCUSSED Manager Rosland recalled that at its meeting of September 5, 1989 the Council had heard a proposal by Southdale management for funding of a fulltime police officer that would be stationed at Southdale Center. The Council had directed staff to develop data on the proposal and bring back recommendations for Council's consideration. Manager Rosland directed the Council's attention to a memorandum on the subject of Private Funding of Public Safety Services dated November 3, 1989 from Craig Swanson, Chief of Police. The recommendations were summarized as follows: Continued analysis and negotiation should be the first action. The Center Companies should be encouraged to consider funding two (2) officers. In lieu of that, Southdale can hire parttime officers to provide,police visibility. The shift from public to private funding should only be done on an informed basis due to the expectations created. If the current proposal is accepted, the Police Department should totally manage the officer and assignment. Member Smith asked if there is any way the City could assess for police services based on commercial densities because of the frequency of calls for police service to Southdale. Attorney Gilligan responded that there are none. However, by special legislation the City could set up a Special Service District for the Southdale area and could charge for increased service provided to the district. Member Rice commented that he was troubled with the whole idea of buying special services although he was sympathetic to the Southdale commercial area and their need for heightened security. He said he was familiar with the special service district having experienced that on another entity and that it would be appropriate for certain services. However, he said that in the area of security he felt the City provides a supreme level of service and that he would not support any one entity receiving anything above that. If Southdale feels it does require additional security service, he would encourage Southdale to hire off -duty police or increase their own security force. Member Rice concluded that he would not support the proposal in its present form. Member Smith said he.differed in that he felt it would be a level of service appropriate to the situation and density. He said he did not think it was a cut and dried issue one way or another. If a commercial area like Southdale continues to require a higher level of calls for police service, the City may have to look at a way of saying to Southdale that they have to put that cost into the cost of doing business. Member Smith said he agreed with the recommendations made by the Chief of Police. Mayor Richards commented that he would not support a special service district or special treatment for any area. He said it has been the policy of the City to fund police, fire and park services out of the general fund as general functions of City government. Manager Rosland said he would communicate to Southdale management that at the present time the City will continue the present level of service to be funded through the general fund. Further, that the City does not want to look at dedicating a police officer to one area. No formal action was taken. (Member Kelly returned to the meeting at this point on the agenda.) *RESOLUTION ADOPTED APPROVING 1990 -91 COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota that it hereby authorized and directs the Mayor and Clerk to execute Agreement No. A10779, between the County of Hennepin and the City of Edina, for the period of January 1, 1990 through December 31, 1991 for the purpose of providing Community Health Services in the City of Edina. Resolution adopted on rollcall vote, four ayes. HOVLAND LETTER REGARDING BLAKE ROAD REFERRED TO TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE Manager Rosland called the Council's attention to a letter from James B. Hovland, 5201 Blake Road, regarding excess speeds by vehicles on Blake Road and suggesting the placement of stop signs as a solution. It was informally agreed by the Council that the letter be referred to the Traffic Safety Committee for their recommendation and that Mr. Hovland be so advised. *PETITION FOR ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTS - EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD REFERRED TO ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith to refer the petition from residents on Eden Prairie Road for ornamental street lights to the Engineering Department for processing. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. *PETITION FOR ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTS - DELANEY BOULEVARD REFERRED TO ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith to refer the petition from residents on Delaney Boulevard for ornamental street lights to the Engineering Department for processing. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. BACH LETTER REGARDING DEER ACKNOWLEDGED Manager Rosland referred to a letter dated November 6, 1989 from Ron and Kay Bach, 6625 Dakota Trail, regarding the deer within the City's boundaries. The Bachs stated that they enjoy the presence of the deer in their neighborhood and that several neighbors share their positive attitude. They said they had heard that some residents have been expressing negative comments about the deer and asked to be advised before any action might be taken to remove or destroy the deer. Manager Rosland advised that Arden Aanestad, an Edina resident, serves on the DNR task force on deer and that Assistant Manager Hughes has talked with him. The DNR is addressing the problem by trying to control the main deer herd in the Minnesota River Valley. Mr. Aanestad said he would keep staff informed as to the results of the task force report. Mayor Richards asked that when the report is received that staff notify all residents who have been concerned about the deer population. RTB CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION TO CITY NOTED Mayor Richards advised the Council that he, Manager Rosland and Ceil Smith had attended a recent breakfast meeting of the Regional Transit Board (RTB). Michael Ehrlichmann, RTB Chair, had presented a Certificate of Appreciation to the City of Edina in recognition of the City seeking special legislation to create the transit system to serve the southeast area of the City. Chairman Ehrlichmann had indicated that the RTB is attempting to communicate with all municipalities in the metropolitan area in response to criticism that there is not fair representation on the RTB. UPDATE GIVEN ON EDINA JOINT PUBLIC RELATIONS EFFORT Manager Rosland reported that several months ago.the Edina Chamber of Commerce had a one day planning retreat which he had attended. Dr. Smyth, Edina School District Superintendent, was also present. -Manager Rosland said he had made several comments, one of which referenced the challenge from the Council to better communicate the Edina word, e.g. Edina is a great place in which to live, work and play. Dr. Smyth had indicated that the School District is committed to promoting this general objective. A follow -up meeting was held three weeks ago at which representatives of the Chamber, School District and City discussed how this kind of communication could possibly be achieved through a joint effort. It was agreed that each entity would go back, discuss this and bring back ideas on how to get out that message at a meeting scheduled for December 15. Manager Rosland said this was put on the agenda for input and discussion by the Council. Mayor Richards said he had attended the last meeting and had raised the question, "Do we really have a commonality of interest or purpose of what we would want to communicate through a joint publication ?" It was suggested that a questionnaire be circulated among the three groups to determine if there is a common objective. He suggested that the Council Members individually complete the questionnaire, and then determine if there is a consensus as to where the Council is coming from which could be taken back. Member Smith said he thought the Council's consensus was to tell the Edina story. to other governmental officials that Edina is a good example of the way to run local government. He also said we should keep in mind the City's Mission Statement. Member Smith said he would support further efforts on this. Member Rice said that he also would support this project and suggested that it might be good to get the information compiled by the focus groups of the Futures Commission. Assistant Manager Hughes stated that this information has already been sent to the Board of Education and that it could be sent to the Chamber as well. Member Rice asked if this joint public relations effort would be separate and distinct from the City's current communications effort. Mayor Richards responded that it would-be. CONCERN VOICED REGARDING OPEN HOUSE PARTY ORDINANCE VIOIATIONS Member Smith expressed his concern about the lack of enforcement of the Open House Party Ordinance in connection with the participation of members of the Edina High School homecoming court at a party on October 6. Newspaper accounts of the incident stated that two individuals ages 16 and 17 were arrested for drinking and that they were released to their parents. He said he was not going to judge that action but that the message going around the school is that "they got off ". He suggested that the City do a better job of providing background to the general public as to the appropriateness and degree of difficulty the police officers have in meting out uniform justice when the facts are buried. Member Kelly said that because this has become a public issue maybe it would be good to have a report on the matter from the Police Department. Mayor Richards commented that once an ordinance has been passed he would expect it to be enforced. He said he would not want a report on the incident because the City Manager has the responsibility of supervising the City departments. Member Smith clarified that he wanted to convey Council's support to the Police Department by making sure the ordinance has the strength necessary for enforcement. BROOKVIEW HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD BURGLARIES DISCUSSED Member Smith said that he assumed all the Council had been contacted by residents in the Brookview Heights neighborhood concerning the recent burglaries. He said he was grateful for the attention provided by the Police Department to that area. However, the neighbors are not confident that they are getting the complete picture on everything they should do to prevent ongoing burglaries. Chief Swanson said that the Brookview Heights area had nine burglaries over a two month period and rightfully so became alarmed. Bill Weir became the spokesman for the group and arranged for a meeting of the neighbors with the Police Department relating to neighborhood security, etc. with another meeting scheduled for November 9. In addition, the Police Department is providing full service of the Crime Prevention Coordinator who has scheduled 10 meetings. The Police Department has consulted with Mr. Weir on everything from neighborhood patrols to alarm systems. One of the criticisms was that detectives were not on duty at night. Chief Swanson said that there is not the manpower available for that and he knew of nothing more that could be done. CALLS NOTED ABOUT STORM SEVER PIPES Member Kelly said she had received several calls from residents who were concern about children playing in the storm sewer pipes at Blake Road and Vernon Avenue. She asked that this location be checked as well as other pipes in the area as to safety measures that could be taken to prevent children from accessing the pipes. FEES AND CHARGES FOR 1990 DISCUSSED Member Rice asked when the Council would be taking formal action of the proposed fees and charges for 1990 because he had some questions concerning them. Manager Rosland said that action would be taken in conjunction with adoption of the 1990 Budget at the Council Meeting of December 4. FORMAT FOR STREET LIGHTING PETITIONS QUESTIONED Member Rice questioned the difference in format of the petitions submitted for street lighting, noting that some are misleading in that there is no information that the cost will be assessed. Manager Rosland explained that the City does have a standard form which generally is used. However., occasionally residents circulate petitions which they have drafted themselves and which do not contain information as to assessment for improvements. When those petitions are processed by the Engineering Department the residents are notified of the improvement hearing and the areas proposed to be assessed. RESIGNATION OF OTTO BYRNE FROM HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION ANNOUNCED Mayor Richards called to the Council's attention a letter dated November 1, 1989 from Otto Byhre stating that he is resigning from the Human Relations Commission. He suggested that the Council submit names of individuals for appointment to fill the vacancy. I14C 1990 PROPOSED CITY POLICIES AND PRIORITIES DISCUSSED 'Manager Rosland directed the Council's attention to the League of Minnesota City 1990 Proposed City Policies and Priorities. These policies will be considered for final adoption by the membership at the League's Policy Adoption Meeting on November 16, 1989 at the Hotel Sofitel in Bloomington. Manager Rosland said he would be attending to represent the City and that any Council Members who wished to attend should contact Susan Wohlrabe for registration. He indicated that many of the policies are carry -overs from prior years. If the Council Members have any specific policies with which they are uncomfortable they should so advise. Mayor Richards asked that any issues be conveyed to Manager Rosland by November 13 so that he could then contact the Council Members to obtain a consensus prior to the adoption meeting. Member Smith spoke to the following policies: Tort Liability and Insurance - 1) Arbitration clause to more economically settle disputes without going through the court system, and 2) Reinstate the authority of a governmental body to assess for a judgement to reduce the need for insurance. Member Rice commented as follows: Gopher State One -Call - In support of exempting cities from the Gopher State One -Call excavation system. Ethics in Government - Strongly objects to the ethic standard that public officials disclose personal interest in real property in the state valued at more than $2,500. No formal action was taken. RESOLUTION ADOPTED RELATING TO $12.970.000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREiiM REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1989: AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE, AWARDING SALE FIXING FORM AND DETAILS. PROVIDING FOR EXECUTION AND DELIVERY THEREOF AND SECURITY THEREFOR The City Clerk presented affidavits showing publication of the Notice of Bond Sale for the $12,970,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1989 of the City in a legal newspaper having general circulation in the City, and in a daily or weekly periodical published in a Minnesota City of the first class, which circulates throughout the state and furnishes financial news as a part of its service, as required by law. The affidavits were examined, found to comply with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475 and directed to be filed in the office of the City Clerk. The City Manager reported that four sealed bids for the $12,970,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1989, had been received prior to the time designated in the Notice of Bond Sale for the opening of bids. Pursuant to the Notice of Bond Sale and Terms and Conditions of Sale the bids have been opened, read and tabulated, and the terms of each have been determined to be as follows: Total Interest Interest Bid for Cost - Net Name of Bidder Rates - Principal Average Rate FIRST BANK N.A. MINNEAPOLIS 6.00 -1991 $12,833.815.00 $9,372,193.75 DAIN BOSWORTH INCORPORATED 6.10 -1992 6.8639% NORWEST INVESTMENT SERVICES-, INC. 6.15 -1993 PIPER JAFFRAY & HOPWOOD 6.30 -1995 INCORPORATED 6.30 -1995 THE NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY 6.40 -1996 Allison - Williams Company. 6.45 -1997 American National Bank 6.50 -1998 and Trust 6.60 -1999 Cronin & Company, Inc., Chicago 6.70 -2000 Juran & Moody, Inc. 6.75 -2001 Miller, Johnson and Kuehn, Inc. 6.80 -2001 Miller & Schroeder Financial, 6.85 -2003 Inc. 6.90 -2004 Smith Barney, Harris.Upham & 7.00- 2005/06 Co. Incorporated ' Baird & Co., Incorporated Criag Hallum Dougherty, Dawkins, Strand & Youst Incorporated John G. Kinnard & Co. Marquette Bank Minneapolis , Moore Juran and Company, Inc. M.H. Novick & Company, Inc., Minneapolis Park Investment Corporation Summit Investment Corporation SHEARSON LEHMAN HUTTON, INC. PRUDENTIAL -BACHE CAPITAL FUNDING SMITH BARNEY, HARRIS UPHAM & CO. DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS, INC. 6.50- 1991/96 $12,814,360.00 $9,396,130.83 6.55 -1997 6.8815% 6.60- 1998/99 6.70- 2000/01 6.75 -2002 6.85 -2003 6.90 -2004 6.95- 2005/06 GRIFFIN, KUBIK, STEPHENS 6.00 -1991 $12,814,360.00 $9,483,708.33 & THOMPSON, INC. 6.10 -1992 9.94568 6.20 -1993 6.30 -1994 6.40 -1995 6.50 -1996 6.60- 1997/98 6.70 -1999 6.80- 2000/01 6.90- 2002/03 7.00- 2004/06 HARRIS TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK BEAR, STEARNS & CO. KIDDER, PEABODY & CO., CHICAGO Bank of Oklahoma, N.A. Hutchinson, Shockey, Erley & Co. Mercantile Bank N.A. St. Louis Stern Brother & Co. William Blair & Company Van Kampen Merritt Inc., Lisle A. Webster Dougherty & Co., Inc. Illinois Company, Inc. Prescott, Ball & Turban, Inc., New York 6.60 - 1991/98 $12,814,920.00 $9,487,730.00 6.65 -1999 6.94858 6.75 -2000 6.85 -2001 6.95- 2002/06 Manager Rosland pointed out that the sale would provide present value savings of $426,958.70 which exceeds the goal set by Council of at least $400,000. Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: . RESOLUTION RELATING TO $12,970,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1989; AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE, AWARDING THE SALE, FIXING THE FORM AND DETAILS, PROVIDING FOR THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY THEREOF AND THE SECURITY THEREFOR BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), as follows: Section 1. Authorization and Sale. 1.01. Authorization. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178 and Chapter 475 the City has issued its General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985 (the Series 1985 Bonds) in the original principal amount of $12,000,000. The Series 1985 Bonds were issued to provide funds to finance public redevelopment costs paid or incurred by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Edina, Minnesota (the ERA) or the City in connection with a redevelopment project being undertaken by the ERA pursuant to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the Redevelopment Plan) of the HRA. The Series 1985 Bonds are payable from tax increments derived from the tax increment financing district established by the HRA pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan which is designated by Hennepin County as District No. 1201 (Tax Increment Financing District No. 1201). In addition, to finance public redevelopment costs of the Redevelopment Plan, the HRA has established another tax increment financing district covering property in the area subject to the Redevelopment Plan, which is designated by Hennepin County as District No. 1203 (Tax Increment Financing District No. 1203). Tax Increment Financing District No. 1201 and Tax Increment Financing District No. 1203 are hereinafter together referred to as the "Districts ". The Series 1985 Bonds are presently outstanding in the amount of $11,850,000. The City presently estimates that it can effect a substantial annual debt service savings by refunding the outstanding bonds described above which are callable for redemption and prepayment by the City in advance of their maturities in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Name of Bidder GRIFFIN, KUBIK, STEPHENS & THOMPSON, INC. HARRIS TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK BEAR, STEARNS & CO. KIDDER, PEABODY & CO., CHICAGO Bank of Oklahoma, N.A. Hutchinson, Shockey, Erley & Co. Mercantile Bank N.A. St. Louis Stern Brother & Co. William Blair & Company Van Kampen Merritt Inc., Lisle A. Webster Dougherty & Co., Inc. Illinois Company, Inc. Prescott, Ball & Turban, Inc., New York Interest Rates 6.00 -1991 6.10 -1992 6.20 -1993 6.30 -1994 6.40 -1995 6.50 -1996 6.60- 1997/98 6.70 -1999 6.80- 2000/01 6.90- 2002/03 7.00- 2004/06 Bid for Principal $12,814,360.00 Total Interest Cost - Net Average Rate $9,483,708.33 9.9456% 6.60- 1991/98 $12,814,920.00 $9,487,730.00 6.65 -1999 6.9485% 6.75 -2000 6.85 -2001 6.95- 2002/06 Manager Rosland pointed out that the sale would provide present value savings of $426,958.70 which exceeds the goal set by Council of at least $400,000. Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO $12,970,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1989; AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE, AWARDING THE SALE, FIXING THE FORM AND DETAILS, PROVIDING FOR THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY THEREOF AND THE SECURITY THEREFOR BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), as follows: Section 1. Authorization and Sale. 1.01. Authorization. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178 and Chapter 475 the City has issued its General Obligation Tag Increment Bonds, Series 1985 (the Series 1985 Bonds) in the original principal amount of $12,000,000. The Series 1985 Bonds were issued to provide funds to finance public redevelopment costs paid or incurred by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Edina, Minnesota (the BRA) or the City in connection with a redevelopment project being undertaken by the HRA pursuant to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the Redevelopment Plan) of the HRA. The Series 1985 Bonds are payable from tax increments derived from the tax increment financing district established by the HRA pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan which is designated by Hennepin County as District No. 1201 (Tag Increment Financing District No. 1201). In addition, to finance public redevelopment costs of the Redevelopment Plan, the HRA has established another tax increment financing district covering property in the area subject to the Redevelopment Plan, which is designated by Hennepin County as District No. 1203 (Tax Increment Financing District No. 1203). Tax Increment Financing District No. 1201 and Tax Increment Financing District No. 1203 are hereinafter together referred to as the "Districts ". The Series 1985 Bonds are presently outstanding in the amount of $11,850,000. The City presently estimates that it can effect a substantial annual debt service savings by refunding the outstanding bonds described above which are callable for redemption and prepayment by the City in advance of their maturities in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.67; and the City hereby authorizes the issuance and sale of $12,970,000 in aggregate principal amount of general obligation refunding bonds (the Bonds) on the terms set forth in this resolution, the proceeds of which, together with other available moneys of the City, shall be used for this purpose, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.52. 1.02 Sale of Bonds. Notice of the sale of the Bonds was duly published as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60. Pursuant to the Notice of Bond Sale and the Terms and Conditions of Sale, four (4) sealed bids for the purchase of the Bonds were received at or before the time specified for receipt of bids. The bids have been opened and publicly read and considered, and the purchase price, interest rates and net interest cost under the terms of each bid have been determined. The most favorable proposal received is that of First Bank National Association, of Minneapolis, Minnesota and associates (the Purchaser), to purchase the Bonds at a price of $12,833.815.00, plus accrued interest from the date of the Bonds to the date of delivery thereof, the Bonds to bear interest at the rates set forth in Section 3.01. The proposal is hereby accepted, and the Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute a contract on the part of the City for the sale of the Bonds with the Purchaser. The good faith checks of the unsuccessful bidders shall be returned forthwith. 1.03. Performance of Requirements. All acts, conditions and things which are required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the valid issuance of the Bonds having been done, existing, having happened and having been performed, it is not necessary for this Council to establish the form and terms of the Bonds, to provide security therefore and to issue the Bonds forthwith. 1.04. Maturities. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.54, subdivision 17, this Council hereby estimates that the tax increments from the Districts pledged herein to the payment of the Bonds are sufficient to pay when due the principal of and interest on the Bonds. Section 2. Form of Bonds. 2.01. Bond Form. The Bonds shall be prepared in substantially the following form: No. [Face of the Bonds] UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BOND SERIES 1989 Date of Rate Maturity Original Issue CUSIP November 1, 1989 REGISTERED OWNER PRINCIPAL AMOUNT SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS DOLLARS THE CITY OF EDINA, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the City), acknowledges itself to be indebted and, for value received, hereby promises to' pay to the registered owner named above, or registered assigns, the principal amount specified above, on the maturity date specified above, with interest thereon from the date of original issue specified above, or the most recent interest payment date to which interest has been paid or duly provided for, at the annual rate specified above, payable on January 1 and July 1 in each year, commencing July 1, 1990, to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month, all subject to the provisions referred to herein with respect to the redemption of the principal of this Bond before maturity. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof at the principal office of the Bond Registrar hereafter designated, the principal hereof, are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft of First Trust National Association, in St. Paul, Minnesota, as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the Bond Registrar), or its successor designated under the Resolution described herein. Additional provisions of this Bond are contained on the reverse hereof and such provisions shall for all purposes have the same effect as though fully set forth hereon. This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution until the Certificate of Authentication hereon shall have been executed by the Bond Registrar by manual signature of one of its authorized representatives. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Edina, Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed by the facsimile signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager and by a printed facsimile of the official seal of the City and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the date set forth below. Dated of Authentication: (Facsimile Signature) (Facsimile Signature) City Manager Mayor (Facsimile Seal) CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This is one.of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned within. FIRST TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Bond Registrar By Authorized Representative (Reverse of the Bonds] This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $12,970,000 (the "Bonds "), issued pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on November 6, 1989 (the "Resolution ") to refund outstanding general obligation tax increment bonds of the City. The Bond is issued pursuant to and in full conformity with the provisions of the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota thereunto enabling, including Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178 and Chapter 475. In addition, for the full and prompt payment of the principal and interest on the Bonds as the same become due, the full faith, credit and taxing power of the City have been and are irrevocably pledged. The Bonds are issuable only as fully registered bonds, in denominations of $5,000 or any multiple thereof, of single maturities. Bonds maturing in the years 1991 through 1996 are payable on their respective stated maturity dates without option of prior payment, but Bonds having stated maturity dates in the years 1997 through 2006 are each subject to redemption and prepayment, at the option of the City in whole or in 'part, and if in part, in inverse order of maturities and in $5,000 principal amounts selected by lot, within any maturity, on .- January 1, 1996 and on any interest payment date thereafter, at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued to the date of redemption. At least thirty days prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond, notice of the call for redemption will be mailed to the Bond Registrar and to the registered owner of each Bond to be .redeemed at his address appearing in the Bond Register, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond, not affected by such defect or failure. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions of Bonds so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price therein specified, and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bonds or portions of Bonds shall cease to bear interest. Upon partial redemption of any Bond, a new Bond or Bonds will be delivered to the registered owner without charge, representing the- remaining principal amount outstanding. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Bond Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by his attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Bond Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or his attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange, the City will cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. The City and the Bond Registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond in order to make it a valid and binding general obligation of the City according to its terms have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed in regular and due form as so required; that prior to the issuance hereof, the City has pledged and appropriated tax increments to be derived by the City from tax increment districts in the City to a sinking fund established for the payment of the Bonds; that, if necessary for the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds, ad valorem taxes are required to be levied upon all taxable property in the City, which levy is not limited as to rate or amount; and that the issuance of this Bond does not cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation. The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to the applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM -- as tenants UNIF TRANS MIN ACT..... Custodian..... in common (Gust) (Minor) TEN ENT -- as tenants by the entireties under Uniform Transfers to JT TEN -- as joint tenants Minors with right of survivorship and Act ....................... not as tenants in (State) common Additional abbreviations may also be used. ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints attorney to transfer the within Bond on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: NOTICE: The signature to this PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY assignment must correspond with OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER the name as it appears upon the OF ASSIGNEE: face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration or any change whatsoever. Signature(s) must be guaranteed by a commercial bank or trust company or by a brokerage firm having a membership in one of the major stock exchanges. 2.02. Form of Certificate. A certificate in substantially the following form shall appear on the reverse side of each Bond, following a copy of the teat to the legal opinion of Bond Counsel: We certify that the above is a full, true and correct copy of the legal opinion rendered by Bond Counsel on the issue of Bonds of the City of Edina which includes the within Bond, dated as of the date of delivery of and payment for the Bonds. (Facsimile signature) (Facsimile signature) City Manager Mayor Section 3. Bond Terms, Execution and Delivery. 3.01. Maturities, Interest Rates, Denominations. Payment. and Dating of bonds. The City shall forthwith issue and deliver the Bonds, which shall be denominated "General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1989 ". The Bonds shall be issuable in the denomination of $5,000 each or any integral multiple-thereof, shall mature on January 1 in the years and amounts set forth below, and Bonds maturing in such years and amounts shall bear interest from date of issue until paid or duly called for redemption at the rates per annum shown opposite such years and amounts as follows: Year Amount Rate Year Amount Rate 1991 $185,000 6.00% 1999 $1,035,000 6.60% 1992 130,000 6.10 2000 1,025,000 6.70 1993 160,000 6.15 2001 1,115,000 6.75 1994 170,000 6.20 2002 19100,000 6.80 Year Amount Rate Year Amount Rate 1995 $ 555,000 6.30% 2003 $1,085,000 6.85% 1996 1,060,000 6.40 2004 1,070,000 6.90 1997 1,055,000 6.45 2005 1,100,000 7.00 1998 1,045,000 6.50 2006 1,180,000 7.00 The Bonds shall be issuable only in fully registered form. The interest thereon and, upon surrender of each Bond, the principal amount thereof, shall be payable by check or draft issued by the Registrar described herein. Each Bond shall be dated as of its date of initial authentication. 3.02. Interest Payment Dates. Interest on the Bonds shall be payable on January 1 and July 1 in each year, commencing July 1, 1990, to the owner of record thereof as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the immediately preceding month, whether or not such day is a business day. 3.03. Registration. The City shall appoint, and shall maintain, a bond registrar, transfer agent and paying agent (the Registrar). The effect of registration and the rights and.duties of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto shall be as follows: (a) Register. The Registrar shall keep at its principal corporate trust office a bond register in which the Registrar shall provide for the registration of ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of Bonds entitled to be registered,.transferred or exchanged. (b) Transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender to the Registrar for transfer of any Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner thereof or by an attorney duly authorized by the registered owner n writing, the gegistrar shall authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the transferor. The Registrar may, however, close the books for registration of any transfer after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each - interest payment date and until such interest payment date. (c) Exchange of Bonds. Whenever any Bond is surrendered by the registered owner for exchange, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the registered owner or the owner's attorney duly authorized in writing. (d) Cancellation. All Bonds surrendered upon any transfer or exchange shall be promptly cancelled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. (e) Improper or unauthorized Transfer. When any Bond is presented to the Registrar for transfer, the Registrar may refuse to transfer the same until it is satisfied that the endorsement on such Bond or separate instrument of transfer is legally authorized. The Registrar shall incur no liability for its refusal, in good faith, to make transfers which it, in its judgment, deems improper or unauthorized. (f) Persons Deemed Owners. The City and the Registrar may treat the person in whose name any Bond is at any time registered in the bond register as the absolute owner of such Bond, whether such Bond shall be overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal of and interest on such Bond and for all other purposes, and all such payments so made to any such registered owner or upon the owner's order shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability of the City upon such Bond to the extent of the sum or sums or paid. (g) Taxes. Fees and Charges. For every transfer or exchange of Bonds (except for an exchange upon a partial redemption of a Bond), the Registrar may impose a charge upon the owner thereof sufficient to reimburse the Registrar for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. (h) Mutilated. Lost. Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. In case any Bond shall become mutilated or be lost, stolen or destroyed, the Registrar shall deliver a new Bond of like amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of any such mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in substitution for any such Bond lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in connection therewith; and, in the case of a bond lost, stolen or destroyed, upon filing with the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that such Bond was lost, stolen or destroyed, and of the ownership thereof, and upon furnishing to the Registrar of an appropriate bond of indemnity in form, substance and amount satisfactory to it, in which both the City and the Registrar shall be named as obligees. All Bonds so surrendered to the Registrar shall be cancelled by it and evidence of such cancellation shall be given to the City. If the mutilated, lost, stolen or destroyed Bond has already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms, it shall not be necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment. (i) _Authenticating Agent. The Registrar is hereby designated authenticating agent for the Bonds, within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.55, subdivision 1. 3.04. Appointment of Initial Registrar. The City hereby appoints First Trust National Association, St. Paul, Minnesota, as the initial Registrar. The Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, a contract with First Trust National Association, as Registrar. Upon merger of consolidation of the Registrar with another corporation, if the resulting corporation is a bank or trust company authorized by law to conduct such business, such corporation shall be authorized to act as successor Registrar. The City agrees to pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for the services performed. The City reserves the right to remove any Registrar upon thirty (30) days' notice and upon the appointment of a'successor Registrar, in which event the predecessor Registrar shall deliver all cash and Bonds in its possession to the successor Registrar and shall deliver the bond register to the successor Registrar. On or before each principal or interest due date, without further order of this Council, the City Finance Director shall transmit to the Registrar from the Bond Fund, moneys sufficient for the payment of all principal and interest then due. 3.05. Redemption. Bonds maturing in the years 1991 through 1996 shall not be subject to redemption prior to maturity, but Bonds maturing in the years 1997 through 2006 shall each be subject to redemption and prepayment, at the option of the City, in whole or in part, and if in part, in inverse order of maturities and, within any maturity, in $5,000 principal amounts selected by the Registrar by lot, on January 1, 1996 and on'any interest payment date thereafter at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued to the date of redemption. At least thirty days prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond, the City Manager shall cause notice of the call for redemption to be mailed to the Registrar and to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond not affected by such defect or failure. The notice of redemption shall specify the redemption date, redemption price, the numbers, interest rates and CUSIP numbers of the Bonds to be redeemed and the place at which the Bonds are to be surrendered for payment, which is the principal office of the Registrar. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions thereof so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price therein specified and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bonds or portions thereof shall cease to bear interest. In addition to the notice prescribed by the preceding paragraph, the City shall also give, or cause to be given, notice of the redemption of any Bond or Bonds or portions thereof at least 35 days before the redemption date by certified mail or telecopy to the Purchaser and all registered securities depositories then in the business of holding substantial amounts of obligations of the character of the Bonds (such depositories now being The Depository Trust Company, of Garden City, New York; Midwest Securities Trust Company, of Chicago, Illinois; Pacific Securities Depository Trust Company, of San Francisco, California; and Philadelphia Depository Trust Company, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) and one or more national information services that disseminate information regarding municipal bond redemptions; provided that any defect in or any failure to give any notice of redemption prescribed by this paragraph shall not affect the validity of the proceedings for the redemption of any Bond or portion thereof. Bonds in a denomination larger than $5,000 may be redeemed in part in any integral multiple of $5,000. The owner of any Bond redeemed in part shall receive, upon surrender of such Bond to the Registrar, one or more new Bonds in authorized denominations equal in principal amount to the unredeemed portion of the Bond so surrendered. 3.06. Preparation and Delivery. The Bonds shall be prepared under the direction of the City Manager and shall be executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager, and shall be sealed with the official corporate seal of the City; provided that said signatures and the corporate seal may be printed, engraved, or lithographed facsimiles thereof. In case any officer whose signature, or a facsimile of whose signature, shall appear on the Bonds shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of any Bond, such signature or facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if such officer had remained in office until delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, no Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication on such Bond has been duly executed by the manual signature of an authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of authentication on.different Bonds need not be signed by the same representative. The executed certificate of authentication on each Bond shall be conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this resolution. When the Bonds have been so executed and authenticated, they shall be delivered by the City Manager to the purchaser thereof upon payment of the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the purchaser shall not be obligated to see to the application of the purchase price. Section 4. Security Provisions. 4.01. Escrow Agreement. There has been presented to this Council a copy of an Escrow Agreement relating to the Series 1985 Bonds, between the City and an escrow agent (the Escrow Agreement). The form of the Escrow Agreement is hereby approved and is ordered to be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver the Escrow Agreement on behalf of the City in substantially the form herein approved with such changes as may be approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, which approval shall be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery of the Escrow Agreement by the Mayor and City Manager. Proceeds of the Bonds and fiords of the City or HRA available therefor shall be deposited with the escrow agent as provided in the Escrow Agreement in the amount set forth in the Escrow Agreement. 4.02. Bond Fund. A Bond Fund is hereby created, as a special fiord and designated on the books of the City as the 1989 Tax Increment Refunding Bonds Bond Fund (the "Bond Fund "), to be held and administered by the City Finance Director separate and apart from all other fiords of the City. The principal of and interest on the Bonds to be issued at the same time as the Bonds to pay a portion of the costs of the Project shall be payable from the Bond Fund. So long as any of the Bonds or any additional bonds issued pursuant to Section 4.04 hereof and made payable from the Bond Fund, are outstanding and any principal thereof or interest thereon unpaid, the City Finance Director shall maintain the Bond Fund, as a separate and special account to be used for the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds, and on all other general obligation bonds now or hereafter issued by the City and made payable therefrom, to finance _costs incurred by the City in accordance with the Plan in aid of the Project and any other redevelopment project to be undertaken in accordance with the Plan. The City hereby irrevocably appropriates to the Bond Fund (a) the accrued interest on the Bonds, (b) the tax increments derived from Tax Increment Financing District No. 1203 received by the City from the Authority to pay the Bonds, (c) tax increment derived from Tax Increment Financing District No. 1201 which are appropriated by the City to the Bond Fund from the Bond Fund established by the City in connection with its General Obligation Bonds, Series 1981 pursuant to Section 4.04 of a resolution adopted by the City Council on October 5, 1981 (the 1981 Bond Resolution), and (d) any other moneys appropriated or pledged by the terms of this Resolution to the Bond Fund. The City expressly reserves the right to use amounts in the Bond Fund (other than the amounts initially deposited therein upon the issuance of the Bonds) to finance or pay directly costs paid or incurred by the City pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan in connection with any redevelopment project to be undertaken in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no portion of tax increments derived from Tax Increment Financing District No. 1203 shall be used to pay principal and interest on that portion of the Bonds which have been issued to refund the portion of the Series 1985 Bonds used to fund interest reduction programs undertaken by the HRA pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.012, subdivisions 7 to 10. 4.03. Full Faith and Credit Pledged. The full faith and credit and taxing power of the City shall be and are hereby irrevocably pledged for the prompt and full payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds. It is estimated that the tax increment from the Districts and other fiords herein pledged for the payment of the Bonds will be collected'in amounts not less than five percent in excess of the amounts needed to meet when due the principal of and interest on the Bonds so required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61. Consequently, no ad valorem taxes are now levied to pay the Bonds or the interest to come due thereon, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178, subdivision 2. If the money on hand in the Bond Fund should at any time be insufficient to pay principal and interest due on all bonds payable therefrom, such amounts shall be paid from any other fund of the City and such other fund shall be reimbursed therefor when sufficient moneys are available in the Bond Fund. If on October 1 in any year the sum of the balance in the Bond Fund plus the amount of tax increment to be derived from the District is not sufficient to pay when due all principal and interest to become due on all bonds payable therefrom in the following calendar year, or the Bond Fund has incurred a deficiency in the manner provided in this Section 4.03, a direct, irrepealable, ad valorem tax shall be levied on all taxable property within the corporate limits of the City for the purpose of restoring such accumulated or anticipated deficiency in accordance with the provisions of this Resolution. 4.04. Additional Bonds. The City reserves the right to issue additional bonds payable from the Bond Fund and tax increments to be derived from the Districts as may be required to finance costs of other projects to be undertaken in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan. 4.05. Additional Bonds Under 1981 Bond Resolution. Since the Bonds will be payable in part from tax increment derived from Tax Increment Financing District No. 1201, the Bonds constitute "additional bonds" payable from the Bond Fund established by the 1981 Bond Resolution and are authorized to be issued by Section 4.07 of the 1981 Bond Resolution. 4.06. Execution of Documents. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute and deliver on behalf of the City such documents as may be appropriate to evidence the pledge and appropriation of the tax increments from District by the Authority to the City to pay the Bonds. Section 5. Defeasance. When any Bond has been discharged as provided in this section, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this resolution to the holders of such Bonds shall cease, and such Bonds shall no longer be deemed to be outstanding under this Resolution. The City may discharge its obligations with respect to any Bond thereto which is due on any date by depositing with the paying agent on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full; or, if any,Bond should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged by depositing with the paying agent a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued to the date of such deposit. The City may also discharge its obligations with respect to any prepayable Bond according to its terms, by depositing with the paying agent on or before that date an amount equal to the principal, interest and redemption premium, if any, which are then due, provided that notice of such redemption has.been duly given as provided herein. The City may also at any time discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds, subject to the provisions of law now or hereafter authorizing and regulating such action, by depositing irrevocably in escrow, with a bank qualified by law as an escrow agent for this purpose, cash or securities which are authorized by law to be so deposited,�bearing interest payable at such times and at such rates and maturing on such dates as shall be required to pay all principal, interest and redemption premiums to become due thereon to maturity or said redemption date. Section 6. County Auditor Registration. Certification of Proceedings, Investment of Moneys. Arbitrage Designation of Bonds as Qualified Tax Exempt Obligations and Official Statement. 6.01. County Auditor Registration. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the County Auditor of Hennepin County, together with such other information as the County Auditor shall require, and io obtain from said County Auditor a certificate_ that the Bonds have been entered on his bond register as required by law. 6.02. Certification of Proceedings. The officers of the City and the County Auditor of Hennepin County are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the purchaser of the Bonds and to Dorsey & Whitney, Bond Counsel, certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City, and such other affidavits, certificates and information as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the Bonds as the same appear from the books and records under their custody and control or as otherwise known to them, and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the City as to the facts recited therein. 6.03. Tax Covenant. The City covenants and agrees with the holders from time to time of the Bonds that it will not take or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents any action which would cause the interest on the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder (the Regulations), and covenants to take any and all actions within its powers to ensure that the interest on the Bonds will not become subject to taxation under the "Code and the Regulations. The City will cause to be filed with the Secretary of Treasury an information reporting statement in the form and at the time prescribed by the Code. 6.04. Arbitrage Certification. The Mayor and City Manager, being the officers of the City charged with the responsibility for issuing the Bonds pursuant to this resolution, are authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the purchaser thereof a certificate in accordance with the provisions of Section 148 of the Code, and Sections 1.103 -13, 1.103 -14 and 1.103 -15 of the Regulations, stating the facts, estimates and circumstances in existence on the date of issue and delivery of the Bonds which make it reasonable to expect that the proceeds of the Bonds will not be used in a manner that would cause the Bonds to be arbitrage bonds within the meaning of the Code and Regulations. 6.05. Compliance With Rebate Requirement. The City will not use the proceeds of the Bonds in such a manner as to cause the Bonds to be "arbitrage bonds" within the meaning of Section 148 of the Code and applicable Regulations; to this end, the City shall: (i) maintain records identifying all "gross proceeds" (as defined in Section 148(f)(6)(B) of the Code) attributable to the Bonds, the yield at which such gross proceeds are invested, any arbitrage profit derived therefrom (earnings in excess of the yield on the Bonds) and any earnings derived from the investment of such arbitrage profit; (ii) make, or cause to be made as of the anniversary date of the issuance of the Bonds, the annual determinations of the amount, if any, of excess arbitrage required to be paid to the United States by the City (the Rebate Amount); (iii) pay, or cause to be paid, to the United States at least once every five Bond Years the amount, if any, which is required to be paid to the United States, including the last installment which shall be made no later than 60 days after the.day on which the Bonds are paid in full; and (iv) retain all records of the annual determination of the foregoing amounts until six (6) years after the Bonds have been fully paid. In order to comply with the foregoing requirements, the City Finance Director shall determine the Rebate Amount within 30 days of each anniversary date of the issuance of the Bonds and upon payment in full of the Bonds and shall deposit such Rebate Amount in a separate account and shall separately account for the earnings from the investment of the Rebate Amount. In the event the foregoing requirements conflict with the requirements of the Regulations promulated under Section 148(f) of the Code, the requirements of such Regulations shall be controlling. 6.06. Official Statement. The Official Statement, dated as of October 24, 1989, relating to the Bonds prepared and distributed by Public Financial Systems, Inc., the financial consultant for the City, is hereby approved, and the officers of the City are authorized in connection with the delivery of the Bonds to sign such certificates as may be necessary with respect to the completeness and accuracy of the Official Statement. 6.07. Redemption of Refunded Bonds. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to call for redemption on January 1, 1996, all of the Series 1985 Bonds maturing on or after January 1, 1997. The City Manager shall cause the necessary notices of redemption to be published and mailed in connection with the redemption of the Series 1985 Bonds. Adopted by the City Council on November 6, 1989. ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member Rice and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Kelly, Rice, Smith, Richards and the following voted against the same: None whereupon'said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, and was signed by the Mayor, whose signature was attested by the City Clerk. CLAIMS PAID Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith to approve payment of the following claims as per pre -list dated 11/6/89: General Fund $137,427.82, C.D.B.G. $2,025.00, Communications $258:46, Art Center $3,471.59, Capital Fund $247.37, Swimming Pool Fund $128.00, Golf Course Fund $13,434.47, Recreation Center Fund $7,263.17, Gun Range Fund $744.11, Edinborough Park $16,421.74, Utility Fund $261,372.09, Storm Sewer Utility $1,521.00, Liquor Dispensary Fund $13,737.42, Construction Fund $76,631.05, Total $534,691.63 and for confirmation of payment of the following claims dated 9/30/89: General Fund $440,334.47, Art Center $1,645.41, Swimming Pool Fund $3,381.77, Golf Course Fund $20,339.46, Recreation Center Fund $7,749.35, Gun Range Fund $617.21, Edinborough Park $18,236.99, Utility Fund $70,162.69, Storm Sewer Utility $180.44, Liquor Dispensary Find $243,921.68, Construction'Fund $177,850.40, Total $984,419.87. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the meeting adjourned at 10:52 p.m. City Clerk November 20, 1989 OF COUNSEL JOSEPH GITIS RICHARD A. NOROSYC MLSO ADMITTED IN Edina City Council City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Re: Proposed Ordinance No. 804 and Related Zoning Ordinance Amendments Dear Council Members: This letter is written on behalf of our client, Mr. Steven Utne. Mr. Utne is the owner of the property located at 5257 Lochloy Drive (Lot 6, Block 1, Edina Highlands). The property is a 35,671 square _foot single family lot with 159+ feet of frontage on Lochloy Drive. Mr. Utne purchased his property with the specific intent to subdivide it into two lots. Mr. Utne originally applied to subdivide the property on August 17, 1988. A revised plat was submitted on November 16, 1988. The proposed subdivision complies in all respects with the City of Edina's existing subdivision and zoning ordinances, and Planning staff has recommended approval. The proposal is also identical to a proposed subdivision which received preliminary approval in 1964. Consideration-of Mr. Utne's proposed subdivision has been delayed for nearly a year by a moratorium on the division of single family lots adopted by the City Council on December 5, 1988. Mr. Utne's is the only pending subdivision affected by the moratorium. The City Council now has before it proposed Ordinance No. 804 and related zoning ordinance amendments (the Proposed Ordinances) which, if adopted, would apparently prohibit the subdivision of Mr. Utne's property. The purpose of this letter is twofold: First, to set forth in writing Mr. Utne's objections to the Proposed Ordinances, which 'JAMES P. LARKIN LAI3F�hT HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN LTD. DAVID J. PEAT - ROBE R T L. HOFFMAN MICHAEL T. ­KIM JACK F. DAL Y CHARLES R. wEAVfR D. A4NNETM LINDGREN ATTORNEYS AT LAW HERMAN L. TALLE WENDELL R. ANDERSON VINCENT G. ELLA GERALD M. FRIEDELL ANDREW J. MITCHELL ALLAN E MULLIGAN JOHN A. COTTER ROBERT J. MENNE55EY BEATRICE A. ROTHWEILCR JAMES C. CRICK SON - ISOO NORTHWESTERN FINANCIAL CENTER 2000 PIPER JAFFRAY TOWER PAUL B. PLUNKETT EDWARD J. DRISCOLL ALAN L. KILOOW JAMES P. MILEY 7900 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH 222 SOUTH NINTH STREET KATHLEEN M, PICOTTC NEWMAN GENE N. FULLER MICHAEL S. LE BARON OAVIO C. 9ELLERGREN BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 FRANCIS E. GIBERSON RICHARD J. KEENAN _ TRACY R. EICMHORN- NICKS. JOHN D._FULLMER _ TELEPHONE 16121 835-3800 TELEPHONE 16121 338-6610 AMY DARR GRADY ROBERT E. BOYLE - - CATHERINE BARNETT WILSON* FRANK L HARVEY FAX 16121 896 -3333 FAX 16121 336-9760 - JEFFREY C. ANOCRSON CHARLES S. MODELL DANIEL L. BOWLS$ CHRI$TO PM ER J. DI ET2EN _ TODD M. VLATKOVICH JOHN R. BEATTIE TIMOTHY J LINDA H. FISHER - NORTH SUBURBAN OFFICE GREGORY E KORSTAD THOMAS P. STOLTMAN LISA A. GRAY STEVEN G. LEVIN 8990 SPRINGBROOK DRIVE, SUITE 250 GARY A. RENNEKE FORREST 0. NOWLIN - THOMAS M. WEAVER _ MICHAEL C. JACKMAN COON RAPIDS, MINNESOTA 55433 SHANNON K. MCCAMBRIDGC JOHN E. OIEHL MICHAEL S. COHEN JON S. SWICRZEWSKI TELEPHONE (6121786-7117 DENISE M. NORTON THOMAS J. FLYNN GARY A. VAN CLCVC JAMES P. OUINN FAX (6121786-6711 MICHAEL B. BRAMAN TODD I. FREEMAN JOSEPH W. DICKER STEPHEN B. SOLOMON JACOUELINE F. OICTZ PETER K. BECK LEN L. KNACK JEROME N. KAHNKE RGAY OONEY D. IVES SHE RRILL OMAN KURETICH JULIE A. WRASE GERALD L. BECK CHRISTOPHER J. MARRI$THAL JOHN B. LUNDOUI$T Reply to Bloomington SHARON L. BRENNA DAY LE NOLAN• 'SHARON CANADA LITZAU THOMAS B. HUMPHREY, JR. TIMOTHY J. KEANC JON R. NORSCRO _ WILLIAM C. GRIFFITH THEOOORC A.MONCALC JO NN J.$TEFFENHAGCN DANIEL W. VOSS November 20, 1989 OF COUNSEL JOSEPH GITIS RICHARD A. NOROSYC MLSO ADMITTED IN Edina City Council City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Re: Proposed Ordinance No. 804 and Related Zoning Ordinance Amendments Dear Council Members: This letter is written on behalf of our client, Mr. Steven Utne. Mr. Utne is the owner of the property located at 5257 Lochloy Drive (Lot 6, Block 1, Edina Highlands). The property is a 35,671 square _foot single family lot with 159+ feet of frontage on Lochloy Drive. Mr. Utne purchased his property with the specific intent to subdivide it into two lots. Mr. Utne originally applied to subdivide the property on August 17, 1988. A revised plat was submitted on November 16, 1988. The proposed subdivision complies in all respects with the City of Edina's existing subdivision and zoning ordinances, and Planning staff has recommended approval. The proposal is also identical to a proposed subdivision which received preliminary approval in 1964. Consideration-of Mr. Utne's proposed subdivision has been delayed for nearly a year by a moratorium on the division of single family lots adopted by the City Council on December 5, 1988. Mr. Utne's is the only pending subdivision affected by the moratorium. The City Council now has before it proposed Ordinance No. 804 and related zoning ordinance amendments (the Proposed Ordinances) which, if adopted, would apparently prohibit the subdivision of Mr. Utne's property. The purpose of this letter is twofold: First, to set forth in writing Mr. Utne's objections to the Proposed Ordinances, which LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD. Edina City Council November 20, 1989 Page 2 objections have been put into the record by Mr. Utne's representatives at the hearings before the City Council; and second, to put the Council on notice that if the Proposed Ordinances are adopted, and Mr. Utne is prohibited from subdividing his property, this action by the City will frustrate Mr. Utne's investment backed expectation in purchasing his property, and will constitute a taking of the developable portion of Mr. Utne's property. 1. The Proposed Ordinances are Unfair and Unlawful in That They Violate the Uniformity Requirement of State Law. The statutory, authority which allows Minnesota municipalities to enact zoning ordinances clearly requires uniformity in zoning district regulations. Minnesota Statute S 462.357, subd. 1 states in part, as follows: "The regulations shall be uniform for each class or kind of buildings, structures or land and for each class or kind of use throughout such district. . ." This proposition has been upheld time and time again by Minnesota courts. See Hay v. Township of Grow, 206 N.W.2d 19 (1973), Northwestern College v. City of Arden Hills, 281 N.W.2d 865 (1979), Odell v. City of Eagan, 348 N.W.2d 792 (Minn. App. 1984), Prior Lake Aaareaates Inc v City of Savage, 349 N.W.2d 575 (Minn. App. 1984). The Proposed Ordinances violate the uniformity requirement and state law on two grounds: First, the Proposed Ordinances create a double standard as between lots which are already developed and those which require replatting to achieve full development. A new series of minimum lot standards apply to new lots which don't apply to similarly situated existing lots in the Single Dwelling Unit District. Second, the impact of the Proposed Ordinances is not uniform as between new lots. This is because each lot to be subdivided is the reference point for a new "neighborhood" under the ordinance. Minimum dimensional requirements are the median of lots within the "neighbo,rhood." Therefore, two lots on the same street which are to be subdivided would be subject to different minimum dimensional requirements depending upon the size of existing lots around them. In response to our uniformity challenge, staff has stated that only the "application" of the regulations must be uniform, not the results. However, in interpreting this requirement, the Minnesota Supreme Court has stated, "a zoning ordinance must operate LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD. Edina City Council November 20, 1989 Page 3 uniformly on those City of Arden Hill The word "operate" "to run or control Dictionary (1984). must be uniform in regulation impacts it is not uniform. similarly situated Aggregates, Inc. v App. 1984). similarly situated." Northwestern College v. a, 281 N.W.2d 865 (1979). (Emphasis added.) is variously defined as "to have an effect" or the functioning of." See The American Heritage It is merely semantics to say an ordinance its application but not in its result. If a similarly situated properties differently, then Or stated another way: "Unequal treatment of properties is prohibited." Prior Lake . City of Savage, 349 N.W.2d 575, 580 (Minn. 2. The Proposed Ordinances are Unlawful in That They Do Not Promote the Public Health, Safety, Morals, or General Welfare. The cumulative effect of the new minimum dimensional requirements set forth in the Proposed Ordinances is to require new lots to be substantially larger than existing lots in the Single Dwelling Unit District. In fact, the median (average) size of existing lots in the newly created "neighborhood" becomes the minimum size for new lots. We do not see any public health, safety, morals or general welfare rationale for an ordinance which imposes substantially different and more restrictive requirements on new lots which are not applicable to existing lots in the same zoning district. If the purpose of the Proposed Ordinances is to reduce population . density, dimensional regulations are sustained only where there is a substantial relation to the public health, safety, or general welfare. See Rohan, Zoning and Land Use Controls, S 34.02[1]. In fact, the use of minimum lot area requirements to reduce density has been criticized: Minimum lot area requirements are the primary devices used by most municipalities to control the density and development of suburban America. Such ordinances are the most difficult to rationalize in terms-of local police power when they require substantial large lots.- See Comment, "A Survey of-the Judicial Responses to Exclusionary Zoning," Syracuse L. Rev. -537, 539 (1971). If the purpose of the Proposed Ordinances is to preserve neighborhood character, this -is not a sufficient basis for unequal treatment of new lots." Minnesota courts have warned against grounding zoning decisions solely on aesthetic considerations or neighborhood opposition. wee Odell v. City of Eagan, 348 N.W.2d 792, 797 (Minn..App. 1984). See also Northwestern College, 281 N.W.2d at 869 (Minn. 1979). LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGBEN, LTD. Edina City Council _ November 20, 1989 Page 4 The Minnesota Supreme Court has.been instructive in past decisions where a zoning ordinance was not uniform in its impact on similarly situated properties: If it can be shown that a particular zoning classification bears no relationship to the health, safety, or public welfare of a municipality, or that the classification is arbitrary and discriminatory insofar as it relates to different property owners affected by it, the courts should not hesitate to invalidate the classification on constitutional grounds. Perron v. Village of New Brighton, 145 N.W.2d 426 (Minn. 1966) quoting from Pearce v. Village of Edina, 118 N.W.2d 659 (Minn. 1962). 3. The Proposed Ordinances Place Unreasonable Burdens on Single Family Homeowners. In addition to being unfair and unlawful by treating new lots_ differently from existing lots, the Proposed ordinances-also place an unreasonable burden on single family lot owners who wish to split their lot. Under the Proposed Ordinances, a homeowner who seeks to split his lot must obtain detailed information regarding the dimensions of potentially hundreds of surrounding lots - just to find out what the minimum size for his lots will bel This requirement alone is. unreasonable, is prohibitively expensive, and is likely by itself to prevent most simple lot splits. At a minimum, the proposed ordinance should provide that the City will advise a property owner of the minimum lot dimensions applicable to his property. 4. The Proposed Ordinances are Unnecessary. The Proposed Ordinances are unnecessary because the Zoning Ordinance's current minimum district standards are uniform, are supported by a rational- basis, and have served the City of Edina well. The Staff concluded -as much in a memo to the Planning Commission on this suhj.ect, dated March 29, 1989, in which it stated, "the end t product of the existing subdivision process has produced results reflecting sound community planning." The problems staff identified with the current subdivision ordinance focused on the subdivision process and the difficulty, uncertainty, and controversy it creates for property owners. Staff did not find flaws in the performance standards. There is no need to change the City's minimum lot dimensions, particularly not as proposed. V LARKIN, HOFF -MAN, DALY gc L.INDGREN, LTD. Edina City Council November 20, 1989 Page 5 Furthermore, the Proposed Ordinances will create more difficulty, more uncertainty, and more controversy as homeowners who want to split lots attempt to determine the rules and - minimum dimensions which apply to their property, and staff attempts to confirm dimensional requirements and interpret the ordinance. 5. The Proposed Ordinances Will Take Mr. Utne's Property. It appears that the Proposed Ordinances will prohibit the subdivision of Mr. Utne's property. The fact that we cannot be sure of this illustrates one of the most basic flaws with the Proposed Ordinances. We s &mply do not know what the minimum dimensional requirements for Mr. Utne's property are,and cannot know this until doing a detailed and expensive study of the lots in the newly defined "neighborhood" surrounding Mr. Utne's property. However, if the Proposed Ordinances do prohibit Mr. Utne's proposed subdivision, this will frustrate Mr. Utne's specific intent when he purchased his property to subdivide it into two lots. Mr. Utne's proposed subdivision complies in all respects with the City's existing subdivision and zoning ordinances and is entitled to approval.. Failure to do so will result in a taking of Mr. Utne's property. In conclusion, we urge the City Council not to adopt the Proposed Ordinances. The requirements set forth in these ordinances are neither uniform in impact on similarly situated property in the Single Dwelling Unit District, nor is there a rational underlying basis to support enactment. The ordinance amendments are unlawful, unreasonable, unfair, and unnecessary. V t my your , Peter K. Beck, for LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD. - kw - cc: Thomas S. Erickson, Esq., City Attorney = PKB:FC6s:kw 0 RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION EDINA HIGH SCHOOL 1989 -90 GIRLS' TENNIS TEAM WHEREAS, the Edina High Schoot 1989 -90 GiAtV Tenn z Team was Lake Con6enence Champions, Section VIAA Champions and State Champion6; and WHEREAS, success ha3 come to the membeAs o4 the team becauze o6 thei& exVu- ondina& y ab.c ?,ity, houAz o6 p ta.ctice, and the teaderus h ip o6 the iA coaches; and WHEREAS, ae nepnez entat-i.ves o6 the City o6 Edina, the membeu o6 the team exempti6ied the highest standaAd6 o6 athtetie pno6.ici.ency and good .6pontsmavu6 hip; NOGG, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Counei e. that zineene eongnatu2ation6 be extended to membetus o6 the team: A.ei. Agu6tszon, Cathy BiAketan.d, L.i nnea Ca&U on, Amy Eu k i.ne, Jonna FuAtong, Betsy Hou s eA, Ke.tty McCartney, Many McNutt,- Jacqueti.ne Moe, Kaeti.e Rive z, Kani Sandefuson, Katja Senn, and Lee G1itti.aw, and to their coaches, Cha te6 Andexson and Bnuee C2a ke. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that thin tesotution be neeonded in the Minutes ob the Edina City Councit and that copies be given to membenb o6 the team. ADOPTED this 20th day ob November, 1989. Mayon POP. ACTION INDEPENDENT 9CH00L nISTRICT 273 Regular Meeting, Novemher 13, 1989 Volume �l Report SUBJECT: COMMFNDATION OF EDINA HIGH SCHOOL 1989 -90 GIRLS' TENNIS TEAM; Be it Resolved, That The Board of Education Commend the Edina High School Girls' Tennis Team and their coaches for exemplary performances and accomplishments as follows: Lake Conference Champions Section VIAA Champions State Champions Section and State Team Participants: Individual Honors: Ali Agustsson Cathy Birkeland Linnea Carlson Amy Erskine Jonna Furlong Betsy Houser Kelly McCarney Mary McNutt Jacqueline Moe Kaelie Rivers Kari Sanderson Katja Senn Lee Williams `1 Jacqueline Moe -- Section VIAA Singles Champion State Singles Champion Cathy Birkeland -- Section VIAA Singles, 2nd Place State Singles, 2nd Place Kari Sanderson -- Section VIAA Doubles, Champion State Doubles, Champion Kaelie Rivers -- Section VIAA Doubles, Champion State Doubles, Champion Additional Team Members: Am Armbrust Jan Cady, Moll Corrigan Allis n Davis Erin,` iffin Alexand a Hays Anne Ingwalson Head Coach: Charles Anderson Assistant Coach: Bruce Clarke Athletic Director: Bud Bjerken Assistant Athletic Director: Mary Manderfeld Mil Johnson Pipe L son Kathr Meyer Jen fe Noyce Mo ly Si ons Regina Smith • nro", • fees REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland From: Craig Larsen Date: November 20, 1989 Subject: New Subdivision Ordinance No. 804 and corresponding amend- ments to Zoning Ord. No. 825 -A30 Recommendation: Agenda Item # III-A- 1 & 2 Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution 0 Ordinance ❑ Discussion Grant second reading for new Ordinances. Info /. Background: The proposed Ordinance has been amended in the following areas: 1. The definition of neighborhood on page 1 has been changed to reflect the definition considered by the Council at its November 1, 1989, meeting. 2. The Ordinance is revised to require the proponent to certify both the posting of the sign and mailed notice to neighborhood before the application is accepted for processing. ­ (page 6) 3. The Ordinance continues to contain the "shall deny" language in Section 14, page 14. However, it may be changed to the attached "shall consider" language. No other changes have been made to either Ordinance. Revise Sec. 14 (c) on page 20 to read as follows: (c) In addition to the foregoing matters, the Commission, in connection with its recommendation to the Council, and the Council in determining whether to approve or disapprove a proposed plat or subdivision, shall specifically and especially consider the following matters: (1) Whether the proposed plat or subdivision complies with the policies, objectives or goals of the Comprehensive Plan. (2) Whether the proposed plat or subdivision complies with the policies, objectives, goals or requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, including, without limitation, the lot size and dimension requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, and the Flood Plain Overlay District and Heritage Preservation Overlay District of the Zoning Ordinance, as varied by variances therefrom, if any, granted pursuant to the Zoning Ordinance. (3) Whether the design of the proposed plat or subdivision, or design or type of improvements proposed to be placed thereon, may be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public. (4) Whether the proposed plat or subdivision conforms to, and complies with the requirements or, applicable state law. (5) Whether the proposed plat or subdivision complies with the policies, objectives, goals or requirements of this ordinance, as varied by variances therefrom, if any, granted pursuant to this ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. 804 AN ORDINANCE REGULATING PLATS AND SUBDIVISIONS, PRESCRIBING THE PROCEDURE FOR APPROVAL OF PLATS AND SUBDIVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR VARIANCES, REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 801, AND PRESCRIBING A PENALTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Purpose and Objectives. The purpose and objectives of this ordinance are to provide for the orderly, economic and safe development of land and urban services and facilities; to facilitate adequate provision for transportation, water, sewage, storm drainage, schools, parks, playgrounds and other public services and facilities; to promote the public health, safety and general welfare by establishing physical standards, design requirements and procedures for plats and subdivisions of land; to allow flexibility in design of plats and subdivisions; to develop a consistency with and to help implement the zoning, building and other applicable ordinances and codes of the City; to support and further the City's comprehensive plan by establishing uniform procedures and regulations for plats and subdivisions to preserve and enhance the value and viable economic use of property; and to protect and further, and not frustrate, legitimate investment backed expectations of property owners. Sec. 2. Definitions; Construction Rules; Severability. (a) Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, as used herein, shall have the following meanings: Applicant: All persons; whether one or more, who request approval by the City of a plat, subdivision or lot division, pursuant to this ordinance. City: The City of Edina, Minnesota. Commission: The Community Development and Planning Commission of the City. Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan of the City adopted by the City in 1989, pursuant to applicable Minnesota Statutes, as now or hereafter amended or modified, and including any similar plan or plans as may supersede or be substituted for said Comprehensive Plan. Said Comprehensive Plan is incorporated into this ordinance by this reference thereto as completely as if fully set out herein. Council: The City Council of the City. Engineer: The Director of Public Works and Engineering for the City. Median: The value (being, in this ordinance, lot area, lot depth or lot width, as the case may be) in an ordered set of such values below which and above which there is an equal number of such values, or which is the arithmetic mean of the two middle values if there is no one such middle value. Neighborhood: All lots in the Single Dwelling Unit District, as established by the Zoning Ordinance, which (i) touch, abut or adjoin any part of the proposed plat or subdivision, and (ii) are wholly or partially within 350 feet of any part of such lots and parcels which so touch, abut or adjoin the proposed plat or subdivision, except, however, that there shall be excluded from (i) and (ii) above lots used for publicly owned parks, Ordinance No. 804 Page 2 playgrounds, athletic facilities and golf courses, and lots used for conditional uses as established by the Zoning Ordinance. If the neighborhood includes only a part of a lot, then the whole of that lot shall be included in the neighborhood. As to streets on the perimeter of the proposed plat or subdivision, the 350 feet shall be measured from the common line of the street and the proposed plat or subdivision. Of Record: Recorded in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, or filed in the Office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota, whichever is the appropriate office to give constructive notice of the document of record. Outlot: An area, parcel, tract or lot of land shown on a plat or subdivision as an outlot. Parcel. Tract or Lot: The definitions in the Zoning Ordinance for parcel, tract and lot are incorporated herein by reference. Planner: The Planner for the City. Plat: The map of one or more subdivisions prepared for filing or record pursuant to, and containing all elements and requirements in, Chapter 505 of Minnesota Statutes, and containing all of the elements and requirements for a subdivision set forth in this ordinance, to the extent such requirements and elements were not waived pursuant to such statute or ordinance, or containing all of the elements and requirement's imposed by, and not waived pursuant to, the statutes and ordinances which were applicable when such map was prepared for filing of record. Replat: A subdivision of an area of land, or parcel, tract or lot then wholly or partially within a plat of record, or a plat then having received final approval by the Council pursuant to this ordinance. Subdivision: The separation of an area of land, of a parcel, tract or lot into two or more parcels, tracts or lots, or long -term leasehold interests where the creation of the leasehold interests necessitates the creation of streets, roads or alleys, for residential, commercial, industrial or other use, or any combination thereof, except those separations: (1) where all the resulting parcels, tracts, lots or interests will be 20 acres or larger in size and 500 feet in width for residential uses and 5 acres or larger in size for commercial and industrial uses;. (2) creating cemetery lots'; or (3) resulting from court orders, or the adjustment of a lot line by the relocation of a common boundary. For purposes of this ordinance, a subdivision shall include Registered Land Surveys and Auditor's Subdivisions. Zoning Ordinance: Ordinance No. 825 of the City, and all amendments, modifications and supplements thereto and thereof now or hereafter made, and all ordinances hereafter adopted by the Council as successors to said Ordinance No. 825. Said Ordinance No. 825 is incorporated into this ordinance by this reference thereto as completely as if fully set out herein. Ordinance No. 804 Page 3 (a) Construction Rules. The rules of construction set out in Section 3.A of the Zoning Ordinance are incorporated herein by reference. (b) Severability. The provisions of Section 3.0 of the Zoning Ordinance are incorporated herein by reference. Sec. 3. Plat Required. (a) Every subdivision, except as provided in Sec. 4 hereof, shall be platted in full compliance with Chapter 505, Minnesota Statutes, this ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. (b) Any land transferred from one zoning district to another zoning district, excluding, however, transfers to or from the Heritage Preservation Overlay District or the Flood Plain Overlay District, as defined in the Zoning Ordinance, shall be platted in full compliance with Chapter 505, Minnesota Statutes, this ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan, in connection with, at the time of, and as d condition to, such transfer. (c) The provisions of this ordinance shall apply also to parcels taken from a parcel, tract or lot then existing of record by use of a metes and bounds description, and such subdivisions shall be platted in full compliance with Chapter 505, Minnesota Statutes, this ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. Sec. 4. Plat Not Required. (a) Double Dwelling Units. No plat shall be required for subdivisions of lots in Double Dwelling Unit Districts pursuant to Sec. 7(a) of this ordinance, but only a lot division pursuant to paragraph (b) of this Sec. 4 shall be required. (b) Lot Divisions. No plat shall be required for any lot division which adjusts or relocates a common lot line separating two lots and which does not create a new undeveloped parcel, tract or lot that complies, alone or in combination with one or more other parcels, tracts or lots, with the applicable minimum lot area and other requirements of this ordinance and the Zoning Ordinance. However, before any such lot division shall be made or any conveyance resulting therefrom is placed of record, the Council shall adopt a resolution approving the same, and the procedure therefor shall be the same as for preliminary plat approval as set out in Sec. 10 of this ordinance, except that (i) notice of the hearing before the Council need not be published as to lot divisions made pursuant to this paragraph (b) (but shall be made for subdivisions pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section), (ii) no sign need be erected, and (iii) only a survey prepared and signed by a Minnesota registered land surveyor showing the proposed lot division need be filed with the Planner together with the required fee and such additional information that, in the opinion of the Planner, is necessary for evaluation of the lot division and determination that it is consistent with the requirements of this ordinance. Sec. 5. Variances. The Council may waive compliance with any provisions of this ordinance by adoption of a resolution specifying which provisions have been waived in any case where (i) compliance will involve an unnecessary hardship and where noncompliance does not interfere with the purposes of this ordinance, or (ii) an improved plat can be achieved by variances from the requirements of this ordinance. Ordinance No. 804 Page 4 Sec. 6. Denial of Permits. No building permit or other permit for the development or improvement of land shall be issued for construction of a building on, or the development or improvement of, any parcel, tract or lot: (a) conveyed in violation of the provisions of Chapter 462, Minnesota Statutes; (b) in any plat or subdivision hereafter made not complying with the requirements of this ordinance and approved by the Council pursuant to this ordinance; (c) in any plat hereafter made which has not been filed and a certified copy thereof delivered to the Planner as required by Sec. 10(f) hereof; or (d) which is an outlot. Sec. 7. Outlots. It is the policy of the City to allow outlots on plats and subdivisions presented to the City for approval pursuant to this ordinance, but only for the purpose of simplifying the descriptions of parcels of land (i) that would otherwise be excepted from the platted area, or (ii) that are to be conveyed or dedicated to the City or other public body. Therefore, any outlots shown on a plat or subdivision approved by the Council shall not be, nor be deemed to be, lots or parcels as defined in the Zoning Ordinance, nor shall any such outlots be developed by the erection or placing of improvements thereon, except, however, for improvements erected or placed by the City or other public body upon outlots conveyed or dedicated to it, unless first replatted into lots and blocks pursuant to this ordinance and the applicable provisions of state law. Sec. 8. Double Dwelling Unit District (R -2) and Townhouse Plats. (a) Double Dwelling Units., Any lot in the Double Dwelling Unit District as then determined by the Zoning Ordinance may be subdivided into two lots notwithstanding the regulations stated in the Zoning Ordinance which apply to the Single Dwelling Unit District. Provided, that as a condition to the approval of such subdivision the owner or owners of the lot to be subdivided shall make a separate and independent connection of each dwelling unit on the lot to be subdivided with the public sanitary sewer and water mains, or obtain a waiver from the Council of such connection, and pay the connection charges therefor, if any, all as required by City Ordinance Nos. 431, 1101 and 1111, and after such conditions are met and complied with the City Clerk shall give a certified copy of the Council resolution approving such subdivision. (b) Townhouse Plats. As conditions to the approval of any townhouse plat, as defined in the Zoning Ordinance, of previously built and then existing townhouses, as defined in'the Zoning Ordinance, each townhouse shall be separately and independently connected to the sanitary sewer and water mains, or the requirement for such connections shall be waived, and the connection charges therefor, if any, shall be paid, all as required by Ordinance Nos. 431, 1101, and 1111, and after such conditions are met and complied with, the City Clerk shall give a certified copy of the Council resolution approving such plat or subdivision. Sec. 9. Fees; Charges. (a) All plats and subdivisions, and all lot divisions pursuant to Sec. 4(b) hereof, presented for approval by the Commission and Council shall be filed with Ordinance No. 804 Page 5 the City Planning Department and shall be accompanied by a filing fee as then prescribed by Ordinance No. 171 of the City for services to be rendered by City employees in processing the proposed plat. Said fee shall not be refunded for any reason including, without the limitation, rejection of the plat, subdivision or lot division by the Council, or abandonment or withdrawal of the proposed plat, subdivision or lot division by the proponent. The City shall have no duty to process or act on any plat, subdivision or lot division unless and until the applicable fee has been paid to the City. (b) Each person, by filing or submitting an application for approval by the City of a proposed plat, subdivision or lot division, shall have agreed to pay all administrative expenses and attorneys' fees, with interest and costs as herein provided, incurred by the City in connection with or as a result of reviewing and acting on such application. If more than one person signs an application, all such signers shall be jointly and severally liable for such expenses and fees, with interest and costs as herein provided. The expenses and fees to be paid to the City pursuant to this paragraph shall be payable upon demand made by the City, and if not paid within 5 days after such demand is made, shall bear interest from the date of demand until paid at a rate equal to the lesser of the highest interest rate allowed by law or two percentage points in excess of the reference rate. Said applicants shall also pay'all costs, including attorneys' fees, incurred by the City in collecting such expenses, fees and interest, with interest on such costs of collection from the dates incurred until paid, at the same interest rate as is payable on such expenses and fees. For purposes hereof, reference rate shall mean the rate publicly announced from time to time by First Edina National Bank, or any successor thereto, as its reference rate, and if such bank, or its successor, ceases publicly announcing its reference rate, reference rate shall mean the interest rate charged from time to time by such bank, or its successor on 90 -day unsecured business loans to its most creditworthy customers. Sec. 10. Review and Approval Process. (a) Applications. (1) All applications for plat, subdivision and lot division approval shall be filed with the Planner on forms prescribed by the Planner, and shall be signed by the applicant and accompanied by the require fee, the proposed plat or subdivision complying with the criteria and requirements for preliminary plat or subdivision set out in Sec. 12 of this ordinance, the information from utility companies pursuant to subparagraph (3) of this paragraph (a), and such other information as is required by this ordinance or any other ordinance of the City, or as is necessary, in the opinion of the Planner, for evaluation of the application and determining consistency and compliance with the requirements of this ordinance and other applicable ordinances of the City. The application shall not be complete until all information and.documents required by this paragraph have been filed with and delivered to the Planner. (2) A new application shall be required: (i) if the final plat is not submitted for approval by the Council by the first anniversary date of the Council resolution granting preliminary approval thereof; or (ii) if the final plat is not filed for record, and a certified copy thereof filed with the Planner as required by paragraph (f) of this section, by the first anniversary date of the Council Ordinance No. 804 Page 6 resolution granting final approval thereof. (3) There shall be delivered with each application a written instrument from each utility company showing that arrangements acceptable to the Planner have been made with the utility company for the installation of utilities in the manner required by this ordinance and other applicable City ordinances. (b) Hearing and Decision by Commission - Preliminary Approval. (1) Upon receipt by the Planner of the application and all other documents and information required pursuant to Sec. 10(a)(1) hereof, the Planner shall review the application and prepare his/her report therefor and forward the report to the Commission. (2) The persons requesting approval of a plat or subdivision of land shall erect, or cause to be erected, a sign or signs as required by Section 4.B.2 of the Zoning Ordinance, except that the information contained thereon shall be as follows: "This property proposed for subdivision. (Names of Applicants) Tele hones of Applicants) For information contact Edina Planning Department, Phone No. 927 - 8861." Such plat or subdivision shall not be deemed presented to the City, and shall not be reviewed or acted upon by the Commission or Council until such mailed notice has been given, and such sign has, or signs have, been erected for at least 10 calendar days preceding the first hearing by the Commission. The sign or signs at all times shall be kept in good repair and shall be maintained in place until a final decision on the application has been made by the Council, and shall be removed by the applicant 5 days after such final decision. If such signs are not kept in good repair or removed as herein required, then such signs shall be deemed a nuisance and may be abated by the City by proceedings under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and the cost of abatement, including administrative expenses, may be levied as a special assessment against the property upon which the sign is located, or the applicant may be prosecuted for violation of this ordinance, and if convicted shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to penalties pursuant to Ordinance No. 175. If there is more than one applicant, they shall be jointly and severally liable hereunder. (3) Upon receipt by the Planner of evidence satisfactory to the Planner (which may be by an affidavit from the applicant, or applicant's agent or representative) that the required mailed notice has been given and required signs have been erected and will have been given and erected for at least 10 days prior to the Commission hearing, and upon receipt of the report of the Planner, the Commission shall conduct a hearing. After hearing the oral and written views of all persons, the Commission shall make its recommendations at the same or at a specified future meeting thereof. In making its recommendation, the Commission shall be guided by and subject to the provisions of Sec. 14 of this ordinance. Also, if the provisions of paragraph (b) of Sec. 11 hereof apply, the Commission shall recommend the dedication or easement option as provided in said paragraph. Ordinance No. 804 Page 7 (c) Public Hearing By Council - Preliminary Approval. (1) Upon request of the Planner or applicant, and after the Commission has examined and considered the proposed plat, subdivision or lot division (and even if the Commission has failed to make a recommendation to the Council), the Council shall set a date for hearing thereon, which shall be not later than 60 days after the meeting at which the hearing date is set. A notice of the date, time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published once in the official newspaper at least 10 days before the date of hearing; provided, however, that no published notice need be made for lot divisions pursuant to Sec. 4(b) hereof. After hearing the oral or written views of all interested persons, the Council shall make its decision at the same meeting or at a specified future meeting thereof. In making its decision, the Council shall be guided by and subject to the provisions of Sec. 14 of this ordinance. Also, if the provisions of paragraph (b) of Sec. 11 hereof apply, the Council shall select its option as provided in said paragraph. The Council may by resolution: (i) grant preliminary approval, with or without modification, and without conditions, or with such conditions reasonably related to the ' purpose and objectives of this ordinance as the Council may deem necessary or desirable; or (ii) grant preliminary and final approval at the same time, with or without modification,_ and without conditions, or with such conditions reasonably related to the purpose and objectives of this ordinance as the Council may deem necessary or desirable or (iii) refer the plat, subdivision or lot division to the Commission or other appropriate City commissions, officers or departments for further investigation and report to the Council at a specified future meeting thereof; or (iv) reject the plat, subdivision or lot division. (2) The Council shall preliminarily approve or disapprove of the proposed plat or subdivision within 120 days of the receipt by the Planner of an application completed in compliance with this section unless applicant agrees to an extension of the review period. (d) Responsibility for Improvements: Subdivision Financing. (1) When preliminary approval has been given to a plat or subdivision, the applicant shall enter into a Developer's Agreement (herein called the "Agreement ") with the City, on terms and conditions determined by the City, and shall cause.all street, water and sewer improvements required by the Planner or Engineer, or by the resolution granting preliminary approval to be completed, pursuant to the Agreement and to the City's then standards and specifications for such improvements. Such Agreement (A) as to improvements to be installed by the applicant shall obligate the applicant to install and complete all such improvements, at applicant's own expense and under the supervision and inspection of the Engineer, and shall obligate the applicant to pay to the City a fee in compensation for such services in an amount equal to 6.5% of the total construction cost of all,such improvements within 30 days after receipt of a statement therefor, (B) as to improvements petitioned for by the applicant to be installed by the City, which City installations shall be done only in plats then situated within the Single Dwelling Unit Ordinance No. 804 Page 8 District, the Double Dwelling Unit District and the Planned Residence District, as determined by the Zoning Ordinance, shall obligate the City to provide engineering services and construct the improvements and obligate the applicant to pay to the City the cost of such services and construction, through payment of special assessments, which shall be payable in not more than 3 annual installments, and (c) as to improvements petitioned for by the applicant to be installed and assessed in accordance with the regular policies of the City, shall provide for installation if ordered by the Council and assessment in accordance with the then policies of the City; provided, however, that the City shall not be obligated to enter into such agreement (i) if the improvements required by Planner or Engineer or by such resolution are not allocated among the methods at (A), (B) and (C) above in a manner satisfactory to the Engineer, or (ii) if the applicant as to the improvements at (A) and (B) above does not give one or more of a bond, cash in escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit, all as may be required by the Planner or Engineer, or (iii) as to any improvements, if the Council determines that the City must borrow money to pay its costs of construction under such Agreement and such borrowing will jeopardize the City's credit rating. The Agreement shall also provide, as to improvements at (B) above, that if the applicant transfers any lot or parcel in the platted or subdivided area while special assessments then levied or. to be levied for the improvements made pursuant to said Agreement remain unpaid, they will be paid or prepaid in full at the time of such transfer to the City Treasurer or the County Treasurer. (2) Any bond required by the City shall be given by the applicant with a corporate surety authorized to do business in Minnesota and approved by the City as surety thereon, and, as to improvements referred to at (a) above, shall be a performance and payment bond in at least the full amount of all contracts for the installation of such improvements, and as to improvements referred to at (b) above, shall be in the full amount of all costs of making the improvements specified in the Agreement not paid in cash by the applicant before or at the time of entering into the Agreement and shall be given for the securing to the City of the payment of the special assessments. (3) Any cash deposit required by the City shall be deposited by the applicant, in escrow, in a national or state bank having an office in the City, in the full amount of the unpaid improvement costs, together with a written agreement signed by the applicant and the bank whereby the funds in escrow will be paid to the City from time to time solely upon the written demand of the City, to the extent of any default by the applicant in the Agreement then alleged by the City. (4) Any letter of credit required by the City shall be from a national or state bank approved by the City, shall be unconditional and irrevocable, shall be for the full amount of the unpaid improvement costs, and shall ,provide that funds will be paid to the City solely upon written demand from time to time of the City to.the extent of any default by the applicant in the Agreement then alleged by the City. (5) If there is more than one applicant, all thereof shall join in the Agreement, and shall be jointly and severally obligated to perform the obligations of applicant under the Agreement. (e) Final Approval. (1) When a plat or subdivision has been given preliminary approval, the Ordinance No. 804 Page 9_ Planner shall submit a supplementary report to the Council recommending final approval upon receipt by the Planner of the following: (i) a written request from the applicant for final approval; (ii) evidence and documents satisfactory to the Planner meeting and complying with the conditions and modifications imposed by the Council at the time of granting preliminary approval; (iii) the final plat meeting the requirements of this ordinance, including Sec. 13 hereof; (iv) the Agreement, fully executed by the applicant and the City, and the security, all as required by paragraph (d) of this section; (v) a letter or other signed document from each utility company agreeing to comply with Sec. 15 of this ordinance; and (vi) evidence acceptable to the Planner evidencing ownership of, and encumbrances on, the property proposed to be platted or subdivided, including, without limitation, a written opinion from the applicant's counsel addressed to the City, opining that all documents executed and delivered by the applicant to the City have been duly executed and delivered, have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate, partnership or other entity action, are binding on the signing parties and enforceable in accordance with their terms, and containing such additional statements as the Planner may request. Provided,.however, if any one or more of the foregoing items is not received by the Planner, the Planner may yet submit his/her supplemental report to the Council, and the Council may condition its final approval upon the receipt by the Planner of those items not then so received, as well as other matters reasonably related to the purpose and objectives of this ordinance. (2) Upon receipt of the supplementary report'of the Planner, the Council shall act thereon, which action shall be by resolution. Such resolution shall be passed within 60 days of receipt of such supplemental report of the Planner. Final approval may be conditioned as provided in (1) of this paragraph (e), and may be also conditioned upon receipt of the land dedication, cash contribution or security required pursuant to Sec. 11 hereof. If the Council imposes conditions in any grant of final approval, then the officers of the City shall not sign such plat, nor shall the City Clerk issue any certified copy of the resolution of the Council giving such final approval, until such conditions are met and complied with. The City Clerk is authorized, once such conditions have been met and complied with, to issue a certified copy of the resolution of the Council giving such final approval, without reference to such conditions. (f) Filing of Plat: Certified Copy of Approving Resolution. (1) The applicant shall file for record the final plat, at applicant's expense, as soon as possible after receipt by applicant of a certified copy of the Council resolution giving final approval of the plat. Said plat shall not be filed for record, nor accepted for record, unless said certified copy of the Council resolution giving such final approval accompanies such plat when presented for filing of record. A certified copy of such filed plat with the recording data thereon shall be filed with the Planner. Ordinance No. 804 Page 10 (2) If the plat is not filed for record and a certified copy thereof filed with the Planner by the first anniversary daterof the Council resolution giving such final approval (even if such final approval is conditional on performance of further acts by applicant or others), the plat or subdivision shall be deemed abandoned and withdrawn and of no effect, and a new application shall be filed and the plat or subdivision again submitted for review and action pursuant to this ordinance. (3) If the approved plat is of land contiguous to another municipality, the City Clerk shall also file a copy of such resolution with the governing body of such municipality. (4) The City Clerk shall not give a certified copy of the resolution approving the plat or subdivision for a double dwelling unit or a townhouse development until the requirements of Sec. 8 of this ordinance have been fulfilled. Sec. 11. Land Dedication or Cash Contribution. (a) A reasonable portion of any proposed plat or subdivision shall be dedicated to the City for public use for streets, roads, sewer lines, electric lines, gas lines, water lines and facilities, storm water drainage and holding areas or ponds and similar utilities and improvements. The Planner and Engineer shall recommend to the Council what portion is reasonable, the location thereof, the need therefor and the use thereof. (b) Where any plat or subdivision adjoins a natural lake, pond or stream, including streams which flow only intermittently, a strip of land running along all sides thereof which are contiguous to such lake, pond or stream, which strip shall extend from a line 100 feet upland from the lake or pond, as measured from the high water mark, and 100 feet from the centerline of the stream shall be either (i) dedicated to the City for public use, or (ii) subjected to a perpetual easement in favor of the City over and in said land and the bed and water body of such lake, pond or steam for the purpose of protecting the hydraulic efficiency and the natural character and beauty of such lake, pond or stream. The Commission shall determine which of these options is more appropriate and shall recommend to the Council one of said options. In either case, there shall also then be granted to the City the right of ingress to and egress from the said strip of land with workers, equipment and material. Also, where the easement is determined to be in the best interest of the City, said easement shall also provide that the owners of the areas as to which such easement is granted shall not make, do or place any fill, grading, improvement or development of any kind on or to such easement area, or raise the level of the easement area in any way, but all such right to fill, grade, improve and develop, and to raise the level of the easement area, shall be granted by the easement to the City. (c) In addition to the dedication to be made pursuant to paragraphs (a) and (b) in this section, and if the Council reasonably determines that it will need to acquire a portion of the land within the plat or subdivision for the purposes stated in this paragraph (c) as a result of approval of the plat or subdivision, then, as to such plat or subdivision, a reasonable portion of the land therein shall be dedicated to the public or preserved for conservation purposes or for public use as parks, playgrounds, trails, wetlands or open space, provided that, at the option of the City, the owner or owners shall contribute to the City an amount of cash equal to the fair market value of the land otherwise required to be so dedicated or preserved, or dedicate and preserve a part of such land and contribute the balance of such land value in cash. Land then set aside and Ordinance No. 804 Page 11 dedicated for public recreational purposes pursuant to Section 13 (Planned Residential District) of the Zoning Ordinance may be considered as set aside and dedicated under this ordinance to the extent required hereunder in connection with such plat or subdivision, but then only to the extent that such land is in excess of the open space then required by the Zoning Ordinance. Any money so paid to the City shall be placed in a special fund and used only for the acquisition or development of land for conservation purposes, parks, playgrounds, trails, wetlands, and open space. For purposes of this ordinance, "fair market value of the land" is defined as the fair market value of the land within such plat or subdivision as of the date the plat or subdivision is granted final approval by the Council, as determined by the City Assessor. (1) It is the policy of the City, as a general rule, to require dedication of land in the following instances: (i) if the property to be dedicated is adjacent to an existing public park or playground and the additional property will beneficially expand the park or playground; (ii) if the property to be dedicated is six acres or more in size, or is expected to be combined with future acquisitions by the City so that a public park with a minimum of six acres will result; (iii) if the property to be dedicated abuts or adjoins a natural lake, pond or stream, or a wetland then protected by then applicable state or federal laws or statutes; (iv) if the property to be dedicated is necessary or desirable for a storm water holding or ponding area, or is an area which the City intends to have dredged or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds; (v) if the property to be dedicated is a place of significant natural, scenic or historic value. Sec. 12. Requirements for Preliminary Plat or Subdivision. (a) General. The applicant shall file with the application required by Sec. 10 hereof the following information which is required for all proposed plats and subdivisions, and which shall be shown on the proposed plat or subdivision or other accompanying document: (1) The proposed name of the proposed plat or subdivision. (2) The name, address and telephone number of each owner, each agent of any owner, each applicant, the surveyor and the designer of the proposed plat or subdivision. (3) A graphic scale (no smaller than l" = 50'), the north point and the date of preparation of the proposed plat or subdivision. (4) The plat or subdivision shall show the perimeter property lines of the plat or subdivision, and the perimeter lines of each lot, with bearings and distances. (5) The lot and block numbers. Ordinance No. 804 Page 12 (6) The lot width (as defined by the Zoning Ordinance), lot depth (as defined by the Zoning Ordinance) and square footage of each lot. (7) Site data, including total,area, area in lots, area in streets and other public uses, and percentages for each, and divided into existing and proposed. (8) The legal description of the tract to be platted, together with its PIN number(s). (9) The existing zoning classification(s) of the property and adjacent property. (10) Location and size of any proposed outlots, and a conceptual plan (graphically and in writing) for future development thereof.-- (11) All existing public roads and rights of way serving the property, including the grade, width, legally established centerline elevation, and the location and elevation of sidewalks. (12) All proposed public roads and rights of way. (13) Existing easement locations, widths and purposes, and showing invert elevation of sewers. (14) Proposed easement locations, widths and purposes. (15) Location of existing and proposed utilities, including distance to nearest utilities not on or adjoining the property, and showing the invert elevation of sewers. (16) Existing elevations and contours at 2 foot intervals and a preliminary grading plan showing resulting elevations and contours at 2 foot intervals. (17) Minimum front, rear and side setbacks for the proposed improvements on the proposed lots. (18) Location of all wetlands, streams, ponds or lakes within or flowing through the property proposed to be platted or subdivided with normal high water and 100 year flood elevations. (19) Location of all proposed parks, drainage facilities and areas proposed to be dedicated for public use. (20) Ground elevation of land within 100 feet of the perimeter property lines of the area proposed to be platted or subdivided, showing contour lines at 2 foot intervals. • (21) If the land proposed to be platted or subdivided is within the Flood Plain as determined by the Zoning Ordinance, the location and elevation of the Flood Plain shall be shown. (22) The mean grade of the front and rear lines of each proposed lot. (23) The land area, by total square footage and by percentage of all land in the proposed plat or subdivision, to be disturbed in the subdivision Ordinance No. 804 Page 13 by public and private improvements, and the location of such disturbed areas. 0 (24) The location and elevation of all existing improvements on the land in the proposed plat or subdivision and a statement as to whether they will remain or be removed. (25) A graphic illustrating the then existing topography for all lots in the proposed plat or subdivision and showing the location of all areas with slopes of greater than 18 %, and the percentage of such areas relative to the total area in the proposed plat or subdivision, and the percentage of each lot having slopes of 18% or greater. (26) The number of overstory trees then existing on the property proposed to be disturbed by public or private improvements, and their location, having a diameter of 6 inches on more as to deciduous trees, and having a height of 6 feet or more as to coniferous trees. (b) Additional Requirements for Platting or Subdivision of Property in the Single Dwelling Unit District. In addition to the requirements at subparagraph (a) of this section, the applicant for a proposed plat or subdivision of land wholly or partially within the Single Dwelling Unit District as then determined by the Zoning Ordinance shall also deliver to the Planner the following information: (1) A complete list of all properties, and the owners thereof, within Single Dwelling Unit Districts which are wholly or partially within the neighborhood of the property proposed to be platted or subdivided. The list of properties and owners shall be from a source acceptable to the Planner. (2) Relative to the properties included in (1) above in this subparagraph: (i) the square footage for each lot in such properties; (ii) the mean average and median lot area for each such lot; (iii) the mean average and median lot width, as defined by the Zoning Ordinance, for each such lot; and (iv) the mean average and median lot depth, as defined by the Zoning Ordinance, for each such lot. (3) The location of the proposed building pad for each lot in the proposed plat or subdivision. Sec. 13. Requirements for Final Plat or Subdivision. If the Council grants preliminary approval of a proposed plat or subdivision, the applicant shall prepare and deliver to the Planner: (1) two mylar or linen reproducible tracings and two mounted copies of the proposed plat in its final form, complying with the requirements of this ordinance, the preliminary approval granted by the Council, and Chapter 505 of Minnesota Statutes; and (2) evidence satisfactory to the Planner, that the final plat has been reviewed and approved by the Hennepin County Surveyor's office. Ordinance No. 804 Page 14 Sec. 14. Guidelines and Criteria for Evaluating Plats and Subdivisions; Review of Requirements. (a) The Commission in reviewing proposed plats and subdivisions and in determining its recommendation to the Council, and the Council in determining whether to approve or disapprove of any plat or subdivision, may consider, among other matters, the following: (1) The impact of the proposed plat or subdivision, and proposed development thereof, on the character and symmetry of the neighborhood as evidenced and indicated by, but not limited to, the following matters: (i) The suitability of the size and shape of the lots in the proposed plat or subdivision relative to the size and shape of lots in the neighborhood; and (ii) The compatibility of the size, shape, location and arrangement of the lots in the proposed plat or subdivision with the proposed density and intended use of the site and the density and use of lots in the neighborhood. (2) The impact of the proposed plat or subdivision, and proposed development thereof, on the environment, including but not limited to, topography, steep slopes, vegetation, naturally occurring lakes, ponds and streams, susceptibility of the site to erosion and sedimentation, susceptibility of the site to flooding and water storage needs on and from the site. (3) The consistency of the proposed plat or subdivision, and proposed development thereof, and compliance by the 'proposed plat or subdivision, and the proposed development, with the policies, objectives and goals of the Comprehensive Plan. (4) The compliance of the proposed plat or subdivision, and the proposed development thereof, with the policies, objectives, goals and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance including, without limitation, the lot size provisions and the Flood Plain Overlay District provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. (5) The impact of the proposed plat or subdivision, and proposed development thereof, on the health, safety and general welfare of the public. (6) The relationship of the design of the site, or the improvements proposed therefor, and the conflict of such design or improvements, with any easements of record or on the ground. (7) The relationship of lots in the proposed plat or subdivision to existing streets and the adequacy and safety of ingress to and egress from such lots from and to existing streets. (8) The adequacy of streets in the proposed plat or subdivision, and the conformity thereof with existing and planned streets and highways in surrounding areas. (9) The suitability of street grades in relation to the grades of lots and existing or future extension of the City's water and storm and sanitary sewer systems. Ordinance No. 804 Page 15 (10) The adequacy and availability.of access by police, fire, ambulance and other life safety vehicles to all proposed improvements to be developed on the proposed plat or subdivision. (11) Whether the physical characteristics of the property, including, without limitation, topography, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion or siltation, susceptibility.to flooding, use as a natural recovery and ponding area for storm water, and potential disturbance of slopes with a grade of 18% or more, are such that the property is not suitable for the type of development or use proposed. (12) Whether development within the proposed plat or subdivision will cause the disturbance of more than 25% of the total area in such plat or subdivision containing slopes exceeding 18 %. (13): Whether the proposed plat or subdivision, or the improvements proposed to be placed thereon, are likely to cause substantial environmental damage. (b) If the proposed plat is wholly or partially within the Single Dwelling Unit District, then the minimum lot area, lot width, lot depth and lot width to perimeter ratio shall be as follows: (1) If the median lot area of lots in the neighborhood is greater than 9,000 square feet, then the minimum lot area of any lot in the proposed plat or subdivision shall not be less than the median lot area of lots in the neighborhood. (2) If the median lot width, as defined by the Zoning Ordinance, of lots in the neighborhood is greater than 75 feet, then the minimum lot width, as defined by the Zoning Ordinance, of any lot in the proposed plat or subdivision shall not be less than the median lot width of lots in the neighborhood. (3) If the median lot depth, as defined by the Zoning Ordinance, of lots in the neighborhood is greater than 120 feet, then the minimum lot depth, as defined by the Zoning Ordinance, of any lot in the proposed plat or subdivision shall not be less than the median lot depth of lots in the neighborhood. (4) The lot width to perimeter ratio (as defined in the Zoning Ordinance) for any lot in the proposed plat or subdivision shall not be less than 0.1. -(c) The Commission shall recommend denial of any proposed plat or subdivision, and the.Council shall deny, and not approve any proposed plat or subdivision, if it makes any of the following findings: (1) That the proposed plat or subdivision does not comply with the policies, objectives or goals of the Comprehensive Plan. (2) That the proposed plat or subdivision does not comply with the policies, objectives, goals or requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, including without limitation, the lot size and dimension requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, and the Flood Plain Overlay District and Heritage Preservation Overlay District of the Zoning Ordinance, as varied by variances therefrom, if any, granted pursuant to the Zoning Ordinance. Ordinance No. 804 Page 16 (3) That the design of the proposed plat or subdivision, or the design or type of improvements proposed to be placed thereon, may be detrimental to -the health, safety or general welfare of the public. (4) That the proposed plat or subdivision does not conform to, and comply with the requirements of, applicable state law. (5) That the proposed plat or subdivision does not comply with the policies, objectives, goals or requirements of this ordinance, as varied by variances therefrom, if any, granted pursuant to this ordinance. Sec. 15. Utilities. (a) Underground Installation of Utilities. All new utilities (excluding main line electric feeders and high voltage transmission lines) constructed-within the confines of and providing service to customers in the plat shall be installed underground. (b) In Public Easements. All electric and gas distribution lines and piping, roadways, curbs, walks and other similar improvements shall be constructed only on a street, alley or other public way or easement which is designated on a plat or subdivision approved by the Council pursuant hereto, or which has otherwise been approved by the Council. Sec. 16. Street Maintenance. Until a street in a plat or subdivision has been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City, and the Engineer has certified as to such completion, the owner shall keep such street, if used for public travel, in a safe condition for such use, at his/her own expense. The City shall not be chargeable with the cost of or the responsibility for the maintenance of such street until the completion of such street has been so certified. Sec. 17. Penalty. (a) Any person who shall violate any provision of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to penalties pursuant to City Ordinance No. 175. (b) Also any person who conveys a lot, tract or parcel in violation of Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.358, Subd. 4b (which is hereby incorporated herein by reference) shall forfeit and pay to the City a penalty of not less than $100.00 for each lot, tract or parcel so conveyed. Also, the City may enjoin such conveyance, or recover such penalty, by a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction. (c) The person.violating this ordinance, or said Section 462.358, Subd. 4b, shall also pay all costs incurred by the City in enforcing this ordinance or prosecuting such violation, including reasonable attorneys' fees. Sec. 18. Repealer. Ordinance No. 801 is hereby repealed in its entirety. Ordinance No. 804 Page 17 Sec. 19. Effective Date: Filing. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its adoption and publication and, when effective, shall be filed with the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota. First Reading: October 16, 1989 Second Reading: Published in the Edina Sun - Current on Filed with the County Recorder on ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A30 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 825 TO REQUIRE LARGER XINDWK LOTS AREAS AND DIMENSIONS FOR CERTAIN LOTS IN THE SINGLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT (R -1) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Subparagraph 1(a) of paragraph E of Section 11 (Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1) of Ordinance No. 825 is hereby amended to read as follows: "(a) single dwelling unit 9,000 square feet; building provided, however, if the lot is in a plat or subdivision approved pursuant to Ordinance No. 804 of the City, then the minimum lot area shall be the same as determined for lots in such plat or subdivision pursuant to said ordinance." Sec. 2. Subparagraph 2 of paragraph E of Section 11 (Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1)) of Ordinance No. 825 is hereby amended to read as follows: "2. Minimum Lot Width. Single dwelling unit building 75 feet; provided, however, if the lot is in a plat or subdivision approved pursuant to Ordinance No. 804 of the City, then the minimum lot width shall be the same as determined for lots in such plat or subdivision pursuant to said ordinance." Sec. 3. Subparagraph 3 of paragraph E of Section 11 (Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1)) of Ordinance No. 825 is hereby amended to read as follows: "2. Minimum Lot Depth. Single dwelling unit building 120 feet; provided, however, if the lot is in a plat or subdivision approved pursuant to Ordinance No. 804 of the City, then the minimum lot depth shall be the same as determined for lots in such plat or subdivision pursuant to said ordinance. Ordinance No. 825 -A30 Page Two Sec. 4. There is hereby added to paragraph E of Section 11 (Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1)) of Ordinance No. 825 a new subparagraph 4 as follows: "4. Minimum Lot Width to Perimeter Ratio. Each lot shall have a lot width to perimeter ration of not less than 0.1." Sec. 5. There is hereby added to paragraph D (Definitions) of Section 3 of Ordinance No. 825, and inserted in the proper alphabetical order in said paragraph D, the following additional definition: "Lot Width to Perimeter Ratio: The quantity resulting from dividing the lot width by the total lineal feet in the perimeter of that lot. Sec. 6. Subparagraph 3 of Paragraph T of Section 7 of Ordinance No. 825 is hereby amended to read as follows: 113.. Non - Conforming Lots. A non - conforming lot in the R -1 District used or intended fora single dwelling unit building shall be exempt from the width, depth and area requirements of this ordinance, provided, that said lot: (a) is not less than 50 feet in width; (b) is not less than 100 feet in depth; (c) has at least 30 feet frontage on a street; and (d) is not at the effective date of this ordinance, or has not at any time subsequent to such effective date, and has not been at any time since October 22, 1951, held in common ownership with all or part of an adjoining lot or parcel which, together, comply with with the minimum width, depth and area requirements imposed.by this ordinance. A non - conforming lot held as of, or at any time subsequent to, the effective date of this ordinance, or at any time since October 22, 1951, in common ownership with all or part of an adjoining parcel or lot and which meets the requirements of (a), (b) and (c) above, shall not be decreased in size." Sec. 6. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its-passage and publication. First Reading: October 16, 1989 Second Reading: Published in the Edina Sun - Current on ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor i .. A Cn Ic 4, .� REPORT /RECOMMENDATION IBBB To: Kenneth Rosland Agenda Item # III. "B. From: Craig Larsen Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: November 20, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: zoning Ordinance ® To Council Amendment 825 -A33, Increased side yard Action ❑ Motion setbacks for larger lots. ❑ Resolution - Fx I Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Council discussion following imput from Builders Association. Info /Background: This is the first Public Hearing on the proposed Amendment. At the November 6, 1981, meeting Council members requested additional information for the public hearing. 1. Impact of the proposed setbacks on lots in the corridor area (east of France Avenue and north of Crosstown Highway). There are approximately 1100 single family lots in the corridor. Approximately one percent (14 lots) would be subject to increased setbacks. Setbacks for all other lots would remain as they are today. 2. Background information on multiple standards for properties in the same zoning district and information on "grandfathering" non- conforming buildings and uses. In 1984, we reduced the minimum interior side yard setback and increased allowable lot coverage for smaller lots. This was done to reduce the number of variances that were routinely granted and to promote desirable investments, such as two car garages, on smaller lots. The present requirements are: Setbacks for Living pace Lots 75 feet wide or wider Lots less than 75 feet Attached Garage All lots Lot Coverage Lot area of 9,000 square feet or more Lots between 9,000 and 7,500 square feet Lots 7,500 square feet or less Interior Side 10 feet 5 feet 5 feet Allowed Lot Coverage 25% 25 -30% 30% We also employ a tiered approach to lot coverage in the Industrial District. The best example of "grandfathering" is our treatment of non - conforming single family lots. Platted lots which are at least 50 feet wide and 100 feet deep are considered legal non - conforming lots. They may be developed or redeveloped without variances. The Zoning Ordinance also allows non - conforming uses to continue provided they don't expand, change or discontinue for a one year period. Following the November 6, 1989, Council meeting staff contacted the Builders Association and several local builders and remodelers to advise them of the pending Ordinance amendment. We understand the group will make a presentation to the Council Monday night. Current Single Dwelling Unit Buildings on lots 75 feet or more in width Attached Garage Single Dwelling Unit Buildings on lots less than 75 feet in width Alternative 1 Single Dwelling Unit Buildings and attached garages on lots 100 feet in width or more Front Side Interior Rear Street Street Side Yard Yard 30 15 10 25 30 15 5 5 25 Front Side Interior Rear Street Street Side Yard Yard 30 20 10 35 Alternative 2 Interior Side Yard Setbacks On lots having a lot width of 85 feet or more the minimum interior side yard setback shall be increased by one foot for each five feet, or portion thereof, that the lot width exceeds 85 feet. NOTE: All minimum interior side yard setbacks are increased 1/2 foot for each foot the building height exceeds 15 feet. 0 En 0 : ),/ REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland From: Craig Larsen Date: November 20, 1989 Subject: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program Year XIV and XV Budgets Recommendation: Agenda Item # III. ,c. Consent 0 Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion 2 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion A. 1. Transfer of funds from Assistance to Low and Moderate Income Housing project to Handicapped Access project. 2. ,Add Edinborough Park to project description for CDBG Year XIV Handicapped Access project. Info /Background: All funds in year XIV must be expended by year end or returned to Hennepin County. There remains $19,186 in our Year XIV Low and Moderate Income Housing project. There are no projects pending which could utilize the funds. Staff is recommending a transfer to the Handicapped Access project. The funds will be used to help pay for the recently completed Community Center improvements and will pay for the handicapped pool lift at Edinborougb . The second action, adding Edinborough to the project description, is required prior to expending funds. The pool lift is the only contemplated improvement at Edinborough. The proposed transfer and expenditure of funds will close out Year XIV of the program. RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby request the following re- allocation of funds in Year XIV of the Community Development Block Grant Program: Existing Budget Proposed Budget Assistance to Low Income Housing $ 19,186.00 -0- Architectural Barriers 102,948.00 $122,134.00 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Edinborough Park be added to the Architectural Barriers project in Years XIV and XV of the Program. ADOPTED this 20th day of November, 1989. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 20, 1989 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 21st day of November, 1989. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk A. oe�, • • ,�RpOSNt�v • lose REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # IV .A From: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: NOVEMBER 16, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: VACATION OF OLD COUNTY To Council ROAD RIGHT OF WAY - LEO EVANS PROPERTY Action ❑ Motion Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adopt resolution vacating any interest the City may have in Old County Road right of way on Leo Evans Property per opinion of City Attorney. Info /Background: The vacation request.was heard by the Council at its meeting of November 6, 1989. The public hearing was continued to November 20 and the request was referred to the City Attorney for review and recommendation. tV9l.-4 A. ,lrl ° REQUEST FOR PURCHASE o:; TO: Mayor Richards and Council Members FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director,.Park and Recreation Department VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000 DATE: November 15, 1989 AGENDA ITEM yz . g ITEM DESCRIPTION: Aluminum revolving door installed - Golf Dome Company Amount of Quote or Bid j, Flanagan Sales (Aluminum doors) $8,250.00 2. A.D. Schleigermeister (Steel doors) 2. $35,000.00 3. 3 4. 4 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Flanagan Sales $8,250.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: Replace revolving door at golf dome. f Only one basic supplier of the aluminum doors for air structure. Items budgeted in our capital-improvements budget for replacement of capital items. The Recommended bid is 'X I , within budget not with n bydget • ohn , allin. FinanVe Director Kenneth Rosland, City Manager ty9l��l.L;� REQUEST FOR PURCHASE o; :; HrJ•� S`! �ntawKnv,,.� TO: Mayor Richards and Council Members FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director, Park and Recreation VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: November 15, 1989 AGENDA ITEM vi. c ITEM DESCRIPTION: Aluminum double balanced emergency doors with fabric Company boot, installed - Golf Dome Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Flanagan Sales 2. (SOLE SUPPLIER)* 3. 4. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Flanagan Sales '$14,800.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. $14,800.00 2. 3. 4. 5. Doors are needed to upgrade standard for I a.year round facility. *Only supplier of emergency equipment for golf domes. Items budgeted in our capital improvements budget for replacement of capital items. S The Recommended bid is Department within budget not Kenneth Rosland, City allin, )fnance Director REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor Richards and City Council Members FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director, Park and Recreation Department VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000 DATE: November 15, 1989 AGENDA ITEM vi.D ITEM DESCRIPTION: Ice Rink Resurfacer Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1• Becker & Associates $39,285.00 2. Frank Zamboni & Company 2. $41,085.60 3. 3. 4. 4. 5• 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Becker & Associates $39,285.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: New ice resurfacer to replace 1965.resurfacing machine. The Recommended bid is —4— within budget not Department allin, Kenneth Rosland, City Manager ce Director REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Edina City Council FROM: Bob Kojetin VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: - - November 6, 1989 AGENDA ITEM V I . E ITEM DESCRIPTION: Park & Recreation Activities Calendar Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Sexton Printing, Inc. 1. $ 7,083.55 2. Chippewa Graphics, Inc. 2. 8,041.00 3. Bolger Publications 3. 8,966.00 4. Ramaley Printing Co. 4. 10,213.00 5. Metro Printing, Inc. 5. 10,361.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Sexton Printing, Inc. $ 7,083.55 GENERAL INFORMATION: For 22,000 printed copies of Edina Park and Recreation Department 1990 recreation activities calendar in accordance with specifications It The Recommended bid is X- wRhin budget not Qd-s�:6 I Departm nt ybudg o�-;Wallin, Fina a Director Kenneth Rosland. City 1r4A. At 'w�� ° REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor Richards and Council Members FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director, Park and Recreation Department VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000 DATE: November 15, 1989 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Art Center Improvement Company I. Earl Lieikle & Sons 2. Dean & Associates 3. W. 4-Cates Construction 4. Parkos Construction 55. Karkela Construction 6. Ron Graves RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Earl Lieikle & Sons at $176,351 GENERAL INFORMATION: AGENDA ITEM VI.F Amount of Quote or &d 1. $176,351 2. $195,000 3. $198,800 4. $199,300 5. $199,775 6. $204,000 Outcome of Art Center improvement bids meets budget guidelines for up to $200,000 for the expansion. The bid of $176,351 for the expansion plus $15,000 for architecture fees, makes a total of $191,351. 1 N vZ The Recommended bid is within budget not G Department Kenneth Rosland, City Manager o e it 0 •'NR7RPOMZ�O • iBBB REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & Council Members Agenda Item # VII.A. From: Kenneth Rosland Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: November 20, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: To Council SCHOOL BD.STRATEGIC PLANNING RETREAT Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance 0 Discussion Recommendation: That the Council respond to the materials and information provided by Council Member Paulus who attended the recent School Board Strategic Planning Retreat. Info /Background: Council Member Paulus is a part of the Schools'. Strategic Planning Team for 1989 -1990. At the recent Retreat, a Progress Report.was drafted, stating the mission, beliefs, policies, objectives and strategies. (See attached materials.) WE CARE WE DARE WE SHARE ED I Nq- The Process Strategic Planning Progress Report Edina Public Schools November 1989 In October of 1988 the School Board approved the concept of a strategic planning effort. After reviewing various plans the board selected the Cambridge Management Group plan to assist strategic planning. - On November 5 -8 a group of 18 people representing School Board, administration, teachers, support staff, and community members worked intensively to develop a strategic plan for the district. The plan consists of a set of 20 beliefs, a mission statement, 7 strategic policies, 3 districtwide strategic objectives, and 6 strategies as well as an internal/ external analysis and analysis of competition. The remaining - component - action plans for each strategy - will be added in the coming months. This is a draft plan. The final plan will be presented to the board in the spring. If you have comments-or concerns in any of the areas, forward them to the Strategic Planning Team, c/o Dr. Kenneth Dragseth, 5701 Normandale Road, Edina, MN 55424. What's Next As the Edina district moves into the second stage of strategic planning, community and staff. insight and comments will be valuable to the success of the process.. On,.November 21 at _ 7:30 p.m. in Fick Auditorium at the Edina High School we will hold a Strategic Planning Awareness meeting to explain the process, give results of the retreat and recruit community and staff members to serve on any of the 6 Action Teams that will develop action plans for each districtwide strategy. We encourage your participation as we plan the course for Edina schools. Draft The Mission The mission of the Edina Public Schools, working in partner - ship with the community to provide a positive, proactive and innovative environment, is to educate responsible, life -long learners who possess the skills, knowledge, creativity, sense of self -worth and ethical values necessary to survive and flourish in a rapidly changing, culturally diverse, global society. Definition of Mission: A broad statement of the unique purpose for which the organization exists and the specific function it performa. Draft Beliefs We believe that: • Every person can learn. • Learning is a life -long process. • Learners have individual differences. • Self esteem affects learning. • Education is a shared responsibility among the students, family, school, community, and society -at- large. • We cannot be all things to.all people. • This community values education. • People are accountable for their own decisions and actions. • Every person has inherent worth. • Global awareness is an essential component of education. • Cooperation is essential in a competitive world. • Creativity linked with knowledge is valued in the educational process. • Educational progress requires innovation. • A positive and supportive environment enhances the educational process. • Physical and mental well being of people are essential for a healthy school community. • Cultural diversity enhances education. • Survival of our democratic society requires a commitment to fundamental ethical values. • A well balanced education includes participation in extra - curricular and community activities. • Open and timely communication is essential for a healthy school /community environment. • The school district exists to serve the learning needs of its clients. Definition of Beliefs: A statement of the organization's fundamental convictions, its values, its characters. Strategic Planning Team 1989 -90 School Board Members Marilou Birkeland Paul Grangaard Scott Johnson Sarah Jones Superintendent Raymond Smyth Assistant Superintendent for Business Services James Hamann Assistant Superintendent for Educational Services David Vick Director of Community Services Douglas Johnson Secondary Principal Al Ogren Elementary Principal Roger Peterson Senior High Certified Staff Elaine Rothman Junior High Certified Staff Paul Andress Intermediate Grade Certified Staff Peter Hodne Primary Grade Certified Staff JoAnne Farley Support Personnel Sandra Kobs Martin Hidy Civic Leaders Jane Paulus Lynne Westphal Additional Personnel Donald Burger - External Facilitator Cambridge Management Kenneth Dragseth - Internal Facilitator Assistant Superintendent for Planning, Evaluation and Reporting Rod Kesti - Assistant Teacher on Special Assignment Laura Tueting Nelson Coordinator of Information Catherine Dostal Secretary, Kenneth Dragseth Action Teams An orientation session for Action Teams will be held on November 30 at 7:30 p.m. at South View Junior High School. 1 If you would like to be selected 1 for Action Team membership, 1 1 please call or send the form 1 1 below to Catherine Dostal, 5701 Normandale Road, Edina, I MN 55424, 920 -2980, by No- I vember 28. 1 1 am willing to commit the 1 time necessary to serve on an 1 Action Team. Choose from 1 among the strategies. 1 1 1 1 st Choice 1 1 2nd Choice ' Name Position Work Location Page 2 Draft STRATEGIC POLICIES (PARAMETERS) We will: • Find an appropriate learning environment for every learner. • Operate the district in a fiscally responsible manner. We will not: • Tolerate psychological, physical or sexual abuse and /or harassment. • Tolerate the use of alcohol or illegal drugs by any person in or on school property or at school related activities involving students. • Tolerate behavior which is prejudicial and/or diminishes a person's dignity and worth. • Allow programs or services to continue without cyclical review. • Add new programs or services without first considering the reallocation of existing resources. Definition of Strategic Policies : Management pronouncements that estab- lish the parameters within which the organization will accomplish its mission OBJECTIVES • Beginning in the 1991 -92 school year all K -12 students will demonstrate knowledge and appreciation of our rapidly changing, culturally diverse, global society. • By 1991 -92 all students must master specified compe- tencies prior to graduation. • By 1991 -92 all students will demonstrate a knowledge and acceptance of identified ethical values as measured by assessment tools and observed behavior. Definition of Objectives: An expression of the desired, measurable end results for the organization. STRATEGIES • We will aggressively pursue a course of action, in coop- eration with the community, in eliminating the problem of alcohol use by youth. • We will develop and implement programs which will impart identified ethical values to students. • We will develop and implement a program including learning activities at each grade level to educate stu- dents about our rapidly changing, culturally diverse, global society. • We will identify competencies to be demonstrated before graduation, and develop or implement assess- ment procedures for measuring these competencies. • We will enhance and implement a timely, effective internal and external communication system. • We will refine, develop and implement an employee training, evaluation and incentive program. Definition of Strategies: The broadly stated means of deploying resources to achieve the organization's objectives. Edina Public Schools Non - Profit Org. 5701 Normandale Rd U.S. Postage Edina, MN 55424 PAID Permit No. 2078 Minneapolis, MN STRENGTHS Highly motivated students Environment where learning is OK (Being Smart Is'OK!)r Broad based educational opportunities Excellent staff Well educated staff Highly intelligent students Wide variety of community education services Community Resource Pool Program - High level of quality volunteers Kids Club - School age child care availability Staff Development Program Good facilities Excellent extra-curricular offerings Wonderful volunteers Chemical health program Social workers Opportunities for adult enrichment Early childhood family education program Opportunities for life long learning Active and involved Board of Education PTA's Booster Groups Advisory Councils Challenging curriculum District all in one city Community Center Kindergarten Center concept/facility Availability of advanced placement Community Education Services publications Financially sound district Excellent adult basic education, ESL and GED Excellent Superintendent Strong administration Good sources of outside funding (fund raising) Availability of technology (computers) Continuous Progress Program Media centers . Availability of support materials (textbooks, art supplies, etc.) . Special education coverage and .program . Happy and healthy students . Aquatics program Desire to plan for future . Diversity during day (in classroom) Faculty interaction . Stability of faculty (experience) . School Is Fun For Everyone . More new teachers at elementary level . Tradition of excellence . Curriculum development review process . Commitment to de- centralized staff development . Awareness of distinction between policy and administration . Some openness to change and innovation . Numerous responsible policies already in place . Nice kids who are receptive and accommodating . CRP and volunteers in the schools . Positive image . Sense of pride in community . High expectations Abundant professional opportunities . Open organization as apposed to closed . Respect and regard espoused at all levels of the organization . Quality materials and resources available . Organizational processes that involve participation . Humanistic . Clean environment . Low crime Economically, gifted for resources . Collaborative in problem solving approach Experienced administration Cordial board relationships Professional library Planning tools - long -range planning - enrollment . Centralized, teacher developed, well- defined curriculum . Motivated and talented students Excellent. support staff -2- . Leadership opportunities . College prep curriculum . Surplus secondary space . Academic achievement Definition of Strengths: Characteristics which contribute to the ability of the organization to achieve its mission. November 7, 1989 -3- 1. WEAKNESSES communication limited capital outlay resources . aging staff - lack of energy lack of support for non - certified staff lack of programs for vocationally - oriented student . limited "culturally diverse" experiences . lack staff renewal opportunities . some staff lacks comfort level with technology. . "too many balls in the air" . unwillingness for staff to participate in extra - curricular activities . family expecting school to assume too many parental duties, and unrealistic parental expectations . diminishing staff interest in school programs the schools limited involvement in community service . we lack curriculum that addresses rapidly changing, global society . few minority staff members . lack of elementary space . lack of evaluation, recognition and promotion of non - certified personnel . incomplete criterion referenced test development . we need to develop further our partnership with the community . lack of sufficient numbers to make programs viable - (wrestling - electives) . staff development for non certified staff . difficulty of correcting deficiencies . transportation problems determine the school schedule . technology (even phones) limited in access to staff . we are not as homogenous as we used to be . too complacent with the status quo . need to have a balanced staff (age) - sudden turnover with rule of 90 . kids /adults feel pressure and stress do newcomers get lost? . cavalier student attitude about societal issues environment - hunger . dependent upon fluctuations of legislature . limited opportunities for promotions . visibility makes us too self- important . over involvement of the board in administration . comunication between board and staff may result in defensiveness . evaluation of staff . use of alcohol by students affects school environment negatively . limitations of school day and year . slow risk taking . fear of failure . conservative community -1- r. . resistant to change due to a stable community . class size . disruptive students . excessive pull out programs . older buildings- repair, remodeling, replace . much time devoted to individual complaints . food service program draining funds . need to focus on strategic issues . absence of financial incentives to be innovative . staff development focusing more on climate than professional growth . out -of- control special education program . time paradigms . lack of awareness of staff of contemporary problems . resources pread thin over many good programs . secondary tied to traditional schedules . elementary tied to secondary schedules . staffing schedules tied to more than one building - . need for a good communications tool (newspapers to the comunity) . no foreign language in elementary . need for personal learning plans for all students . evaluation of educational programs . extra curric. fallout - lots of activities but kids thy out - do not make it - and then don't get plugged in somewhere else . teaching techniques lack of support groups - staff /parents . clique's or group development . emphasis on sports . lack of cultural arts . awards system . need for students to have pride . addressing social problems at elementary level . vacation policy district . arrogance throughout the district . question too much administration . too tough or difficult to oust incompetent teachers . lack of communication between departments . decisions not being made closest to the area of impact . music program . resistance to change . no clear line for parent involvement . decision making process not always clear and well communicated . community doesn't know where to go with issues -- causes poor use of staff time(Supt.) -2- s t . burnout of teachers . level of stress . competitive nature . parent education at all levels . use /misuse of alcohol, illegal drugs, and tobacco . lack of "universal' value instruction . curriculum in primary grades ...worksheet mania . lack of space for preschool programs . lawsuit mania . available funding K -12 elitism . availability of facilities(or cost) of - during non - school hours . lack of understanding/knowledge of some district program_ s - special education, community education . attitude that we are already the best . lack of science in curriculum Definition of Weaknesses: Characteristics that limit the ability of the organization to achieve its mission. -3- PUPIL TRANSPORTATION WORKSHEET (1988 -89 Data Base) 'ublic School Pupils Transported Elem. Traffic Hazards Elem. .7 to 1 Mile Elem. Reg. 1 Mile Plus Enrollment Change Sec--l-to-2 . Miles Sec. Reg. 2 Miles Plus Enrollment Change Total Nonpublic School Pupils Transported Elementary Christ the King St. Peter's Luth. Golden Years Calvin Christian Groves Learning Ctr. Wooddale Academy Our Lady of Grace St. Thomas the Apostle Sub Total Secondary Lutheran H.S. St. Thomas Academy Visitation School Benilde -St. Margaret Holy Angels Breck (Elem. Incl'd.) Blake (Elem. Incl'd.) Minnehaha Academy Sub Total Nonpublic Total Elem. Reg. Pupils Elem. Nonpublic Sec. Reg. Public Sec. Nonpublic Total Regular 7 -3 -'89 JAN 1988 -89 1989 -90 1990 -91 1991 -92 Actual Pro ection 443 Pro ection 474 Projection 493 1,063 1,127 1,206 1,254 1,258 1,333 1,426 1,483 - +6% +7% +4% 1,182 1,135 1,124 1,169 1,093 1,049 1,038 1,079 -4% -1% +4% 5,014 5,087 5,258 5,477 1988 -89 1989 -90 1990 -91 1991 42 Actual Projection Projection Protection 36 36 36 36 23 23 23 23 32 32 32 32 25 25 25 25 14 14 14 14 0 0 0 0 242 242 242 242 9 9 9 9 381 381 381 381 10 10 10 10 16 16 16 16 7 7 7 7 16 16 16 16 14 14 14 14 98 98 98 98 77 77 77 77 11 11 11 11 249 249 249 249 630. 630 630 630 PUPILS TRANSPORTED SUMMARY 1988 -89 1989 -90 1990 -91 1991 -92 1,259- 1,333 17TEF 381 381 381 ,483 381 9 T.W T;w 1 1,093 1,049 1,038 1,079 249 249 249 249 T;M 2,981 3,012 3,094 3,192 FACTOR rnow. kc0hViolfitl , ivailabt& fv*(Cd,g CATEGORY ASSUMPTION m n, mih•I• �hoh �M eallula� Phoh ow &Vius W X11 b� auai labk �F haul vF �a bs► IMPACT 3 *4 "k` at v sK 45+rt; ek4ego So ch a.n c.. it t. Tf4chtvc1 �is�eo 3 T chs�►�r. Gwrricvlun� clatc rook. , •b 10ca.+10n w, 11 �. Inorc� w r�ca11 rov ►des! s: lUs�rd M �rnd reso�ras 4v ma� n s. FACTOR CATEGORY ��• • ASSUMPTION IMPACT da$ �unc ' /. Nest incr+e�n. will us Uit com{or+ k s4w;V dr rea a Compu�M+►• atadsr*s. e� hi�als�ir`�' /. �Iujill b�lom u� �r qIoib�C EdK {O,,�, ��y n let" ,�,� p1loGeii i n,�el'�nrr,a�. 3. Zrn�prOUt � n�`�' Com mvni cihon S. •yl, nited p�opde sK,i/ls whd ai�l rak. ��'�i , FACTOR Chanqcs i n Fco�omic, s�4*J'c1•w�'v Wor (dmi i CATEGORY OF, ASSUMPTION �t con4 t d w rciN problome �• �dar{ni f+on oj +Ss (�.t, a rbl� . 3 �dN�t Ai � 14�1i fi�ac i►+�b►l'� IMPACT V. 44 "44 fW ul ►ll 11Yv In c& Wgr7 W now Know x. #At 0" da��s w;�1 need 40 In ads *r ft su�v; vim• sduc�.i -elite un�•s� end netpond gppre��# FACTOR �O�'►p��'i-hon 4r ��rn�i�d amCunir qk stogy ��ouxas, f�sinesc CATEGORY de.4)nj) in I C, ASSUMPTION S606 tdl%% haute 40 s6.r* �1'iMa,�a•� n Rcdwtsd sfR�k• re �en�ss ,t. Sbu� clown in /1pi�KKin 'kM'h 0�" is e�r+a 3• �crs�ce b'Fr..�s or+ IMPACT � Schoek hws loss nWit, ?. Mee, demand ;.Pro � in ool.. t:?O,Ajrcg W 1 i-h rose p MAW any a4 sam•li.nsAlL /. C,euttit / /lnrnt�C �,hrrce�s mtlu !r� edvca -ti�a1• z, stow down in A*,l 50 unit W'µ 4. rno►,e, ,donend �F+� 6trVras In tCheots. - _ �COMPEITITON �: �Iwta THEIR ADVANTAGES: IOUR ADVANTAGES: Cdrr►Ir�w,i 4i�fOC4trriGG& (ar 3• Tip stlwel Irvi �l► 044W eoNrnErrnorr:. pub lie. THEIR ADVANTAGES: I. L,sas pms&,,Co #,.,md Cemps+Fi�Ft.ti 2. �iC�'�G� 1'ytti�t� �uaFltsrs� Mix /di Vws� fy 3• �itlisa( P"r�,rs �f � �e vials a ak t- t+�vi/an cwt — 51 G OUR ADVANTAGES: �. 54-t �M l+f OCJh CO n'IMGMI4Y. P%p -10eZd� MAN Z . �IV►�, S'(YpneJ 3 . Sisk Wig derm 4f. 4FA- 7 gfo6ot /W,0646 6, d%+* ; ;A room POINTS OF VULNERABILITY: �- hcl I wi's+r+ o+ 'd'n co I c� Good i C, p""*4;v,,m Ar Fu4um j4ut 1p% Uio,4, "ft%ro,�-w 4v gotAors �. N "A. Fir 3-�►,,�, -o fio 'r= ADVANTAGES: r. H �g ti acs.l�►,; c rtPRtrtfi�n T. Mora ihdiViduwli ssA art Splr� + d+esi+►s �c�is3 ih POINTS OF VULNERABILITY: ON :�pn OUR ADVANTAGES: �. More. oPP*y +-shi4+ss r rates sass P hoe- .401tcs ;03 ihstr�e�io �, a. artc.4 tic C (AfV; Cf.10 . 40014191 J4-sFF 4uev%9vvrr P444sure 4v srve, j J 3, lU rAi 4c#t Fu:j,"*Tgs f 'COMPETITION: 1. Teti, rtli ion i 2• E�,ics /fit rtes L �fri Gs. k-o, �. Aip;ii4,v fo . salter Qkde 4. LAQ class a iZZ 7. ttSS Ge h 4* soor4s +. 'GMs POINTS OF VULNERABILITY: I,. Lim�4vA OUR ADVANTAGES: PPr ��okrks Z, Fs���c� — pa lic s•c la,,-e. s 9 So &k li 4y C,/ /,•c. kt , 4d insfowoh #, + 'echno li iS ti wo( Fxc.-ti4i*,j #Xf' .4cwo efeu iicr. Ac eft ct +i cS 8; Nof sciccfift ;^ �3 Off r'fkh; +itv, Ik sed��ts P 3 . �i►'n Inc i �< <nSf�.{,: /i kn c: ee*07 cnn,�e�v�;ur, lb Vi �w e. NQ sdce&4c OK Aros lot e. %4„1�lih� J�ivilrtt ; , b. Nb aocr,�l�z�fi*or C. NCI �fvv r�a.cak. Inrra/ly d,. 4.ts N�llh�s ati �u5� G. hhR� o�inn� Foe 44ai616 &bµsc. �.4. 1 piss b .Gem �esr►►�,, e.l. �a ini�wds FACTOR CATEGORY AD lil ICA ASSUMPTION �S Nel�c'k� -/a aeb�fC �robluks aF�blic dlacAfroh. s. &firtd*tft T(A* 1k aWeuAf' itwAut 4 lost mire 9�eo1 r►�tkt�'1" May IMPACT 1. 9*it Aaada'Iri' W'llnaf l adejt4AIc q;4Wt*kj &)o r Lff CC W&+tof - JW dcatioH uAka"ky Clotesf.- fs 3. �deaae I'mr � east dF- l lacreoes) �raw4r auk s�rv�c�lr jebpm 4'. rKUaa�d rel �a«ce c tow mzs levy RAMM& at..r, an FACTOR 0 << Iva d CATEGORY40 dZiT'1CAcL IT H►cs wme�t-kle 1401 GcMPI:U A,1ta T>a'&RtaDla& 'm 'W A Co0E.ttNWOP 150ARD �uMT5£'iZ • fb An, GDee r CA tau 1 DATes . C.t�% CsRgh'1'$1L 9�i�t.Eb'6✓ O►�1 �u,P�C.I a�'ptNDEAIT �s�cil�r�l�. S�a1'b►� �€� IkP�2�o��uz.�or� , CATEGORY FACTO ASSUMPTIO �IMIXIC'I'A . P S4vJ 6%, 41-" OiZlrA•��Z�4i'lt>i�lhl.. �UJ6�� �F41�T�°�"'" 43V 1r 1 1 1�d ,i nt QR+w an�n;'iy J hit - i►`rn� on `1�NM p4. �1'�v�ati Sovl•� e Vd Znvo l s,4.a W. FACTOR &,&pow #Aarerol ,GbluC4hoM W oO 0 X 0 r� 0 p p 1000 o a CATEGORY �dNCa%HON p ASSUMPTION �. �»Kto75oH a.�el ►tAdcta�cok S1(oa(d USecl 0 %A. IW"����y *41, &4WKUr �oulco�c) �t� / m 0 0 �l mtrncr 1. !.o«yptc�k clime la� `ol�a'ltoK R ire MEttfs efm IICV4AJW % sq&wd,,,rdc Flo �Ntsi- CaWAM c�.KO«�ika.�lvr (YI�IUIC�t�� leAtki� f09 (Nowr 0 o; O U 0 � � 0 0 FACTOR ir wa*,ft 71 A" CATEGORY -e/ ASSUMPTION 064 oc/ Agate IMPACT VOL"06"" I v*v Igo OW 4.ayp1i,lu,tn% M low t � ' i A e 46 AsoAA AA- 16*44 i CATEGORY �1�.2,Ctix FACTOR /��� ASSUMPTION IMPACT FU" to i FACTOR /, �C"n�+��a�s ♦� d «mil CATEGORY DfMdSet 1O8 . 4w w ASSUMPTION LVt V dfor s �il�Rf 1/� �• all /�� ar��� his de� ifv S f44#4 IPA N . Ao Wm. d ( **J Cl). IMPACT • inerC *400 iry 's "ore �w�I�i ►tee �ot �� : FACTOR of/. 9 CATEGORY Q� Iqa IAA M8 ASSUMPTION 0/4, Awled rr era e46 0if#p 41. #*41 �IG•� Afa 10r0 064+ /#M/ Y4�Aw - ovr•� ofw /*ow rA � a Ili d��I�r�•v Ar' 41000 Jr ldh � . y!r •fe,,I ••- Ih�Ow� • IMPACT ♦AEpeqn sd ov a i� a,;&,. *w*o-o ofiAf et � ovwsa 40owd ♦stales Q 4� I�eai" It��r�st FACTOR wo CATEGORY t'I'fl ASSUMPTION ft,., . •��i. A014evp *A fdm;l11* *pow 6(i14*pv J . wmo// a"ios�. eato /mew In � �l • /mss ( *44 ^w /w 40& IMPACT �• an;; i r- �,�,' low/ , C. - FACTOR ereemor of Ao (6) CATEGORY DO ASSUMPTION op, 46" ~6 #*4vv& dw'�d two 165po" to b. ..�«ltss� d" IL Is a�w►w� t of. 1+t�vnr WL IMPACT A% Arse@, A ,*d *1 woo oloam 0*4 006 Mon ww rtvv �f CENSORSHIP ANQ THE ARTS w FEAR .40 LOATHINR IK IIROS= & WORLD REPORT Ll,.s;.1'4evvs SEF=TEMBEFT25, 1989 $1.95 B E S T w t- a I I AIAY I I ! i BEST JOBS FOR THE FUTURE r The message for the next decade is to retrain and retrain hat is a CIO, or chief information officer, and how does this person's work relate to computers? Why might reproductive endo- crinology be a good career choice for someone struck by the anguish felt by infertile couples? Newly special- ized careers are emerging faster than old ones are dying out, and the trend will accelerate in the 1990s. Some of these new tasks, such as computer - integrated manufactur- ing, dangle the potential of incomes well into six figures for those who can exhibit mastery. Rule No. 1 in today's job market "is that the rules are always changing," says David Birch, head of Cognetics, Inc., a marketing consult- ing firm in Cambridge, Mass. Even professionals drawn to such traditional fields as law, medicine, accounting and engineering should watch for offshoots. Eight of the 25 fastest - growing jobs in the next decade, for example, will be health related. Lawyers specializing in toxic -waste regulations and accountants familiar with new European trade standards will gain an edge on their colleagues. In the automobile industry, tech- nicians who can keep robots running will be worth far more on the factory floor than assembly -line workers. While industry continues to replace workers through auto- mation, many corporations will continue to trim middle managers. The 1990s will offer you less job security, but they will distinctly enrich your job possibilities. 60 1 ► Job-market trends. I ► Hot professions. Small business. New specialties are demographics, cropping up on every technology, foreign front, from competition and a medicine. law and skills gap will make engineering to the their mark P. 61 corporate world P. 62 U.S.NEWS & WORLD REPORT. Sept. 25. 1989 a.� h 1 i 11 0 0 r e) a. 62 ► Salary survey. Pav for the same work varies considerably by city. So shows our exclusive survey of how much people make where p. 66 imvE n ..Cxe. -OR usmdw ► Keeping abreast. Are you rising as fast as you should? The measures oj'success have changed. Here's how you can judge your progress P. 71 U.S.NEWS & WORLD REPORT. Seot 25.1989 JOB-MMKU THRDS Studying the forces shaping the workplace will get you a betterjob arely in good economic times has America's job market appeared so volatile. If the economy continues to expand well into the 1990s, as many baffled economists now predict, tur- bulent forces will create millions of new jobs and sweep old ones aside. Entrepreneurs will be- come even more energetic. Baby- boomers will march into middle age while millions fewer young adults will enter the job market, thanks to the baby bust of the 1970s. The need for advanced robotics will call for specialists who can design, produce and ser- vice them, and foreign com- pennon will send thousands of corporate executives back to school for refresher courses on world culture. With a nod to a steadily grow- ~^ ing economy that should keep the job market thriving in the 1990s. here is a closer look at five major trends that will shape your working future. ■_ Small start -ups Experts predict that businesses em- ploying fewer than 100 workers will gen- erate up to half of all new jobs of the next decade. In Wisconsin, for example, thousands of smaller manufacturing firms have helped cushion the shock of the closing of a 6,500 - worker Chrysler assembly plant in Kenosha last vear. In- deed, Wisconsin added 46,000 manufac- turing jobs, net, in 1987 and 1988 de- spite the plant's closing. That reflects a national trend. Fortune 500 companies have slashed 3.5 million jobs from pay- rolls since 1980. but small businesses generated 20 million new jobs during the same period to keep the country's eco- nomic exparision going. Female entrepreneurs launch more than half of all new small businesses. and many are capitalizing on the grow- ing number of dual- income couples by starting day -care centers and home - cleaning services that stay -at -home mothers didn't need a generation ago. The small -is- better trend is not lost on many of today's talented M.B.A.'s, ei- ther. Seventy percent of recent graduates from the Harvard Business School say their goal is to own and manage their own business within the next five to 10 years. Half of them are expected to actu- ally succeed. ■ Aging population As the work force matures over the next quarter - century, many people will spend less time at work. The number of retirees will also increase, though not as fast as in the past decade. Nursing homes. which now outnumber hospitals by more than 2 to 1, will hire more health -care professionals, nurses and technical assis- tants. The offices, of lawyers, travel agents, accountants and even podiatrists will be thronged with older clients. The over -65 population will rise by less than 4 million during the 1990s. com- pared with an increase of 25 million among workers age 35 to 54. This tempo- rary dip reflects an abrupt decline in births during the Depression years of the 1930s. Despite the slower growth rate, retirees will spend billions more on pei- sonal services during the next decade. Jobs in retailing, food services and hotels will grow rapidly to serve an older popu- lation that enjoys and has the wherewith- al to eat out, travel and shop. By 2010, a deluge of new retirees from the baby - boom generation will cause elder care to surpass child care as a national priority and a potential career market. Until then. however, most foresee baby- boomers re- maining the anchor of a stable and reli- able, if somewhat stagnating, work force. ■ Technology Within the next 10 years, computerized secretaries will reduce office stab by tak- ing and editing dictation. Industrial ro- bots will virtually take over assembly lines, and on the farm so-called agribots will rove through orchards picking fruit at harvest time. The presumed outcome will be better products and services at lower prices, but also painful pink slips for millions of low- income workers who failed to heed the warnings and train for new jobs. Even though only 30.000 ro- bots currently work in U.S. assembly plants, automation already has eliminat- ed two thirds of all assembly -line jobs since 1980. note Marvin Cetron and Owen Davies. authors of American Re- naissance (St. Martin's Press. 1989. $19.95). The two predict that within 10 years, 250,000 additional robots will dis- place another 4 million workers. The good news, they say, is that the rise in new jobs will outpace the elimination of 61, r 1 old ones as technical fields open up to serve the latest advances. ■ Foreign competition Nearly every business in America is about to find itself competing in some way in the global marketplace. To survive intense worldwide competition, many firms will be forced to design and manufacture goods piecemeal around the world, just as Ford recently produced the Mercury Tracer, which was built by the Japanese in Mexico. To seek out new markets abroad and improve relations with for- eign clients here, many firms will expand overseas and staff offices with foreign nationals as well as American M.B.A.'s fluent in the language and the culture of the country involved. Hewitt Associates, a consulting firm specializing in employe pay and benefits, reports opening 29 of- fices in 19 countries since 1985. "We didn't want to be left behind," says Wil- liam Pulliam, head of Hewitt's interna- tional division, of the growing presence of U.S. consulting firms overseas. Besides more jobs in Europe and Asia —an estimated 125,000 Americans now work for U.S. -based companies abroad —firms will also hire more profes- sionals in the U.S. with international backgrounds.in law, accounting and fi- nance. Management consultants, mean- while, are flooding Europe this year to determine the impact of the European Economic Community that will unify Eu- rope for trade in 1992. ■ Skills gap The existing gap in work skills-could widen to a chasm. Professionals with doctorates in science or engineering could become a privileged class. The chasm between jobs and qualified people to fill them will also widen among mid- dle- income workers like paralegals, automobile mechanics, nurses and health technicians. A major cause of the dearth of skilled workers is the rapid decline in the numbers of young people now entering the work force. The 197Os baby bust, coupled with rising illiteracy and school- dropout rates, could produce a shortfall of over 23 million American workers by the early 199Os. Better - educated workers who can adapt to new technologies will discover many new jobs awaiting them in the next decade. Poorly educated workers unwill- ing or unable to learn new skills will find little that will pay enough to support a family. More than a gap between the rich and the poor, say the experts, the dividing line for working America in the 199Os will be between those who have learned how to learn and those who have not. ■ 62 by Miehael Kieman NEWS YOU CAN USE HOT PROFESSIONS A baker's dozen of jobs for the needs of the '90s n response to a rapidly changing and shrinking world, new spe- cialties are emerging in business. in science. even in the venera- ble disciplines of law and medicine. Some will require a specific degree, and most will demand experience and a desire for chal- lenges. Here is a generous sampling of these opportunities. CR 4M, - ge ■ Beating bumouL After assisting in knee surgery at Albemarle Hospital in Elizabeth City, N. C. Bernetta Gillet can still smile As a traveling surgical nurse, she enjoys far more adventure and suffers less stress than she did as a staff nurse in Kentucky. A future stop. Gillet hopes is Alaska. MEDICINE ■ Medical professionals in the 1990s' will find their options shaped by an aging population and new technologies. As in- fertility treatments become more sophisti- cated for example. the demand for re- productive specialists will boom. Already. the nursing shortage has created a new commerce in RN's who can travel. Traveling nurse Some entrepre- neurs have spot- ted an opening in the nurse dearth. More than 40 companies. up from just a hand- ful a decade ago. now broker "traveling nurses" for several weeks or months to fill in at hospitals unable to find full -time hires. Adventuresome RN's with the de- sire and flexibility to move around will find the doors flung open. Nursing - school enrollment. which has dropped 1-7 percent since 1983. will decline an additional 15 percent by 1990. and the drop -offs are expected to continue as students head for more lucrative, less stressful careers. "It's the best thing I've ever done for myself." says Bernetta Gillet. 39, an op- erating -room nurse from Lexington, Ky.. who became a traveling nurse five Years aeo after burning out from stress and long hours as a nursing supervisor at the University of Kentuckv Medical School hospital...A gallbladder is a gall- bladder, and operating -room procedures are essentially the same no matter where I go." says Gillet. "It's the travel that makes it fun." So far. she has worked in hospitals from Maine to Hawaii and wants to head for Alaska. Unlike temporary agencies, which U.S.NEWS 8 WORLD REPORT. Sept. 25. 1989 i -i IT generally place nurses on a day - to-day basis, traveling - nurse firms place nurses for one to three months and allow an extended stay if the nurse and the hos- pital agree. Typically, the firm takes care of all the arrangements between nurse and hospital and pays basic benefits such as Social Security, travel ex- penses and most housing costs. You can generally expect to live with a room- mate in an apartment or dorm. Pay ranges from about 515 to 530 an hour, and some hospitals dangle bonuses of $1,000 or more to lure RN's. The greatest need is for nurses who can work in intensive care, sur- gical units and the emer- gency room. Reproductive endocrinologist Growing numbers of cou- ples will be seeking treat- ment for infertility in the 1990s; more women trying to conceive for the first time after age 30 will find themselves unable to, part- ly because of the rise in infertility- causing sexually -transmitted diseases. And there will be more ways to treat infertility. "Optics, medications, lasers, surgi- cal procedures —it's all new," says Dr. Anne Col- ston Wentz, a reproductive endocrinologist at Northwestern Memo- rial Hospital in Chicago. The result, says Wentz, will be a tremendous need for experts in ovulation, hormones, male in- fertility, diagnostic methods, in -vitro fer- tilization, egg implantation and other "assisted reproductive technologies," as the techniques are delicately called. Training is arduous. Beyond the usual four years of medical school and then a four -year obstetrics- and - gynecology resi- dency, you will need a two -year fellow- ship in reproductive endocrinology. But private practitioners' pay - can top 5200,000, and the work can be extraor- dinarily satisfying. "If I'm the one who helps a woman get pregnant. I've helped her reach the most important goal in her life," says Dr. Janice Andreyko, 35, a reproductive endocrinologist at the Uni- versity of California at San Francisco Medical Center. NEWS. YOU CAW USE COMPUTERS ■ Choose a career in computers and volt will never have to worry about being un- employed. short of another Great Depres- sion. Over the next decade. hundreds of thousands of jobs will be added for pro- gramers technicians and systems ana- lysts. Computer detectives. too. Chief information officer The title "manag- er of informa- tion systems" may conjure up a back- office computer nerd whose days are spent keeping the company computer network in operating order. That may once have contained a kernel of truth but no longer. These days that manag- er —the new "chief information offi- cer"—is a person who can make certain that the entire system, hu- man and electronic, oper- ates efficiently. "I treat the other man- agers as my customers." says Katherine Hudson, vice president of informa- tion systems at Eastman Kodak. She huddles with Kodak managers to devel- op computer -based meth- ods of solving their prob- lems. To speed delivery to hospitals of slides used for blood analysis, for ex- ample, Hudson transferred the inventory records from the slow main - computer system to a speedier, per- sonal- computer network. Among her other innova- tions: Machine operators who produce rolls of pho- tographic film now have a computer terminal at their side so they can enter data about equipment problems they encounter. A chief information offi- cer needs to be able to judge whether a new piece of hardware or software is worth purchasing, but a technical degree is unnec- :essary. A bachelor's degree in the liberal . arts and an M.B.A. with an emphasis on information systems can put you on the CIO career path. A CIO might also come from a computer background, perhaps in- cluding a spell as the com- puter expert in sales or marketing to gain a busi- ness background. Nearly half of the Fortune 500 companies al- ready have CIO's, and smaller compa- nies are starting to follow suit. On aver- age. CIO's make $89,000, but salaries climb past 5300,000. Computer-security officer As a cop, Charles Preston of An- chorage, Alaska, protected citizens from crooks. As a freelance computer - security consultant. he is still after the bad guys. But now, the clients he protects range from local computer dealers to multina- tional companies. and the main culprits are man-made computer viruses that can destroy a system's data. Preston's calling was practically non- existent 15 years ago, in the innocent days when businesses did not think about the need to safeguard their com- puter systems. Today, an estimated U.S.NEWS & WORLD REPORT. Sept 25. 1989 .63 i 10,000 computer- securi- ty experts work on staff at corporations or hire themselves out -as con- sultants, and the num- ber jumps yearly by about 25 percent. "At any given time we are trying to find candidates for 20 to 30 companies," says Cameron Carey, president of Computer Security Placement Ser- vice in Northborough, Mass. Typically, a con- sultant like Preston ad- vises companies on how best to guard their data. He evaluates the protec- tive software programs on the market and reads up on new ways that computer viruses, dis- gruntled employes and industrial spies might slip around any precau- tions in place. The de- mand for security con- sultants has so far been greatest at banks, bro- kerage houses and air- NEWS, YOU: CAN USE7 ez _� ■ 600p slew& Mercury, cadmium, chromium, lead ... _These and other toxic substances are targeted on the job by Stephen Katz, 24, a civil engineer with Radian Corporation in Austin, Tex, who is working on a master's in environmental engineering. From chemical plants to drainage basins, Katz tests soil and water samples for government and industrial clients lines, all of which would be paralyzed without the data stored in their computers. A bachelor's degree in computer sci- ence gives you the tools of the trade, but only a very few schools, such as George Washington University and Idaho State University, have courses that cover com- puter detective work. Starting salaries for corporate jobs are around $25,000. Con- sultants earn $50 to $400 an hour. Electronic artist or designer rjffl,gjn,,, A wine company wants a beautiful label for its Beaujolais nouveau. Com- puter graphic artist Robert Schwarzbach of Cronan Design in San Francisco comes up with .15 designs, all of them stored on computer. The client likes a little of this one, a little of that. Instead of retooling the design by hand, Schwarcbach can zap the pieces together on the computer, print out a new color proof and slap it on a bottle, all while the client waits. Advances in computer technology are being hailed by commercial artists and designers as enormous time and money savers. Of 929.000 commercial artists and designers, some 50,000 now do much of their work on computers, up from 11,000 in early 1988, according to a survey conducted by the trade journal Typeworld. Motion - picture studios. tele- vision news departments, corporate communications staffers. architects and M, fashion designers are also coming to rely on computers for everything from blue- prints for a house to a. design for more durable shirt buttons. The nation's 30 or so art universities offer electronic -art courses, although the technology is changing so quickly that on-the-job learning, usually by trial and error, will be part of any job description. Salaries for an artist or a designer start in the midteens and reach $40,000 after five to 10 years. No matter how sophisti- cated the software, of course, it won't compensate for a lack of artistic talent. ENGINEERING ■ There simply are not enough engineers to go around. Enrollment at engineering schools is down 25 percent since 1982. and the number of needed electrical engi- neers alone is expected to increase by half by the year 2000. Environmental engi- neers in particular will be sought as fed- eral funds are poured into hazardous - waste cleanup. And factories will be competing for manufacturing engineers who can help rev up sluggish production. Environmental engineer So many people are needed to clean up and monitor the state of the nation's air. water and land that environmental engineers with some ex- perience can get "any job, anywhere," says Fred Troise of Geraghty & Miller, a Plainview, N.Y., environmental - consulting firm. Con- sulting companies now gobble up about half of all environmental-engi- neering grads; the rest go to government regula- tory agencies or to pri- vate industry. Most environmental engineers are civil, me- chanical, chemical or other types of engineers who have made the envi- ronment their mission. Mary Tabak, 26, for ex- ample, is a chemical en- gineer who was laid off from her job in the petro- leum industry and de- cided she could put her chemical expertise to work analyzing pollut- ants. She went to North- eastern University for a master's in environmen- tal engineering, then took a job with Camp Dresser & McKee, a Boston consulting firm. On a current project, she is testing soil at a plant where an underground fuel - oil tank has leaked. She will soon direct soil -filled dump trucks to either munici- pal or hazardous -waste landfills, depend- ing on the type of contaminants she finds. After the chemical experts figure out what pollutants they are dealing with, environ- mental engineers with a civil or mechani- cal bent plan ways to extract and contain the noxious substances and cart them away. Undergraduates can study environ- mental engineering as part of the civil - engineering curriculum, and many schools now offer master's programs. Pay for those with a master's starts in the mid to upper S30,000s. Manufacturing engineer its . ,,, The notion of getting down and dirty on the factory floor has not been most engineers' idea of glam- our. But the demand for products as cheap and reliable as those that foreign competitors can provide has rapidly made clear that manufacturing is where the revolution is. The push is on to mechanize the nation's factories. and en- gineers who can design and operate the necessary computers and robots are in desperate demand. Now, companies are moving to com- puter- integrated manufacturing, or CIM, conrinued on page 69 U.S.NEWS & WORLD REPORT. Sept. 25.1989 r C.; What jobs are Worth around the country The salaries people earn vary consid- erably by where they settle. That was ' one finding of our 10 -city survey of 10 CHICAGO DENVER HARTFORD MEMPHIS jobs at three rungs of the ladder. Illinois Colorado Connecticut Tennessee Accountant with a major CPA firm First -year accountant $24,000 - 30,000 $25,000- 27,000 $27,000 - 29,000 $24,500- 26,500 Senior accountant 531,000- 38,000 $28,000- 36,000 $31,000-44,000 $27.000- 35,000 Manager 540,000- 50,000 $44,000. 49,000 550,000- 65,000 540,000- 50,000 Alcohol and drug counselor, nonproRt organization Beginning counselor 512,000- 16,000 $14,000- 18,000. $20,000. 23,000 511,000- 20,000 Midlevel counselor $15,000. 20,000 $18,000- 22,000 $23,000- 27,000 $14,000- 30,000 Supervisor $18,000- 25,000 :522,000= 27,000 $25,000- 30,000 $18,000- 40,000 Corporate attorney In private practice Starting associate 546,000 $36,500 $41,000 $40,000- 44,000 Fourth -year associate 556,500 $49,000 $52,000 $54.000- 60,000 Partner $173,000 $130,000 $113,000 $125,000- 150,000 Computer programer Starting systems programer $25,800 $27,500 $28,200 $27,800 Senior analyst S41,600- $38,700 $37,800 $35,000 Systems director $62,800 $59,600 $57,700 $51,800 Manufacturing engineer Starting engineer $29,300 $24,000 $27,000- 34,000 528,000 Senior engineer 540,300 $41,000 $45,000 " S40,300 Department manager $73,800 570,000 $75,000 $63,000 Nursing-home administrator . Nursing supervisor $26,100 $26,200 527,000 $27,000 Director (5 years' experience) $40,500 541,200 544,400 $36,500 Director (10 years' experience) 543,400 $44,100 $47,500 539,100 Personnel administrator. FwUme 1,000-company plant Personnel assistant $21,900 522.000 $19,000 - 21,000 $18,000- 21,000 Personnel manager 531,300 $28.000. 33,000 528.000- 30,000 $28.000- 31,000 Personnel director $38,900 S38.000-43,000 $44,000- 48,000 $39,000 - 43,000 Professor at a.state unhrerstty Assistant professor $34,100 $33.200 $28.300 531,400 Associate professor $39,000 $38.500 $38,900 $38,600 Full professor $54,600 $49,000 $52,700 547,800 Public librarian Beginning librarian $22,000 $21,300 $25,000• $18,200 Librarian (5 years' experience). $33,500- 37,000 $26,600 $29.200 $26,700 Director of library system $95,000 $71,000 $76,100 $66.700 Retail sales, department store Management trainee S23,000 $23,000- 27,000 522.000- 27,000 518.000- 21,000 Department manager $28,000 $28.000 $24,000 - 30,000 $24,000- 26,000 Store manager 550,000.70,000 $45,000- 55,000 $50.000 - 60,000 S40.000-45,000 Note: Since Hartterd has no state unrersdies, colleg&votessor salary for Hartford reflects figures I MAWR -.Basic Cafe: The Wyatt Com nr. Roper Half Imematiawl. Inc: William M. Mercer met- tor neartry state schools. dmger Hansen, Inc.: David J. white 8 Assodates. Inc; American Association of University Proles 66 U.S.NEWS A, WORD REPORT. Sept 25, t 989 t 9- rt soy gan i _ NINNEAPOUS NEW ORLEANS NEW YORK PORTLAND SAN FRANCISCO TAMPA Minnesota Louisiana New York Oregon California Florida j $24.500- 28,000 522.000- 24,000 530,000- 33,000 522,000- 25,000 $25,000- 28,000 $26,000- 29,000 $29,000- 39,000 $26,000- 35,000 $38,000- 46,000 526,000- 35,000 $31,000- 30,000 530,000 - 40,000 $40,000- 60,000 540.000- 50,000 555,000- 65,000 S38, 500 - 48,000 540,000- 551000 542,000.50.000 $13 200 - 18,700 515,000- 23,000 $16,500 511,100 - 16,500 516,000 513,300 517,600- 23,100 523,000- 34,000 524,000 $16,800- 23,900 $22,000- 32,000 514,500 $20,900- 26,400 $26,000- 39,000 535,000 519,300- 29,000 S35,000- 45,000 5181000. $55,000 540,000- 50,000 $57,000 535,000- 50,000 539,500 530,000- 52,000 $67,000 $70,000- 100,000 $74,000 $45,000- 65,000 554,000 550,000. 60,000. $147,000 5150,000- 300,000 $279,000 5100.000 $130,000 5125,000- 200,000 $28,300 5251000 $30,600 523,700 $32,700 $25,400 537,300 538,300 551,300 $39,200 545,700 539,100 ..559,100 552,600 _$79,100 557,300 566,300 $52,000, $30,000 525;100 $29,100 $25,000 $28,500 528,500 545,500 $39,700 546,400 S36,000 542,000 $40,300 571,000 572,600 586,500 567,000 580,500 572,900 521,000 527,000 526,800 532,600 532,600 $24,000 538,100 536,500- $56,000 545,700 545,700 535,500 $40,800 $39,100 $59,800 548,900 $48,900 $38,000 517,600 S18,000 $22,600 519,000- 23,000- 524,900 516,500 S23, 000 - 30,000 525,000- 29,000 544,00048,000 $27,000- 30,000 538,000 - 42,000 $34,900 l S40,400 535,00045,000 $60,400 535,000- 37,000 $52,500 540,000- 45,000 534,400 527,700 $36,000 529,300 $33,200 531,900 $39,800 531,000 546.000 533,300 541,800 537,100 554,500 541,100 565,500 541,700 552,800 549,300 U.S.NEWS & WORLD REPORT, Sept. 25. 1989 ,67 525,900 516,000 523.900 521.:00 $28,300 521,000 $36,900 $16,900 527,350- 35,000 528,000 536,000- 44,000 529,200 $73,900 550,500 $90,000- 100,000 559,400 $83,200 562,000 521,500 $18.000- 22,000 523.000- 26,000 521,000- 26,000 522:000- 24,000 521,000 $23,000- 26,000 524;000- 28,000 528,000- 32,000 525,000- 29,000 528,000 528,000 545,000 535,00045,000 545,000- 75,000 S40, 000 - 50,000 540,000- 55,000 $45,000 'Am. som Sauce Edo: American C fle" of Healy Care Adtnmmuaton; Hospital Compensation Service: Amm= library Assn a= Hams 8 Assocam Inc; Millet 8 Mitchelk local gom unmt and pnvate or, 3. garumbons Canpilea by Joarnie ht Sd t and Gary Cohen U.S.NEWS & WORLD REPORT, Sept. 25. 1989 ,67 1 Afew useful pay scales. Besides location and choice of profession, the heft of your paycheck will depend on your schooling and, to a surprising degree, on whether you decide to work for the government or private industry. 68 People who work for Uncle Sam are at a significant pay disadvantage. Here is a sampling of the average salaries federal - government and private employes make for the same work in New York City- federal pay PrMate Pay Wame gap Senior tax attorney $55,000 5220,000 300% Beginning criminal police 42% Airplane pilot S823 officer, investigator $15,700 528,500 81% Beginning engineer $20,000 $35,000 75% Beginning securities 37% Chemical engineer $785 examiner 519,500 532,100 65% Senior computer 5768 25% Education administrator programer 554,700 570.500 29% USNdWR --Basic data New York City Federal Esecum Board PATHS WITN THE BIGGEST PAYOFF Based on 1988 median weekly salaries, here are the top- paying jobs for men and women- Men 1988 salary dl1 9 1983.88 Lawyer $930 42% Airplane pilot S823 33% Aerospace engineer 5820 29% Physician 5815 58% Financial manager 5788 37% Chemical engineer $785 24% Personnel and labor- relations manager 5785 30% Securities and financial- services salesman 5768 25% Education administrator $757 30% College professor 5752 46% Electrical engineer 5749 21% Civil engineer $734 27% Mathematical and computer specialist 5733 23% Pharmacist 5720 1988.89 Economist S719 3% Women $22.632 536,252 Lawyer 5774 33% Engineer 5639 28% matnematical and computer specialist 5575 291/6 Personnel and labor- relations manager 5563 NA College professor $555 39% nurse cuuLeauvn avmunlsuawr $499 28% Computer programer 5497 21% High- school teacher 5491 35% Librarian 5465 25% NA= Not available. Note: Figures eschtde pW M ww are sed-entployW W l WMW pn,,, Perimmae Change for arcane pile reummm mow" sine 1984. l/SW WR -aasc Data: LLS DepL of Labor GROUND-FLOOR PAYCHECKS FOR '89 Here's how average starting salaries have climbed during the 1980s, by degree- tsacnetors aegrees 1980-81 1988 -89 Engineering S20,155 S30.081 Computer science 518.018 S29,778 Physics 517,169 528.964 i,ntsnnsuy $16.587 S26,704 Accounting S15,614 S25.051 Mathematics $16.613 $23.968 Marketing, sales 515,024 S22.951 Financial administration $15.162 S22.829 General business administration $14,672 522.346 Communications 513.851 520,534 Social science $12,970 S20.496 Hotel, restaurant management $13,457 S19,751 Education $12.672 $19.641 Agriculture & natural resources 514.530 • S19.360 Personnel administration $14,827 519,176 Liberal arts 513.447 519.083 Human ecology 513.392 S18.466 Master's degrees 1980 -81 1988.89 M.B.A. with nontechnical B.A. 521,672 539.264 M.B.A. with technical -B.S. $22.632 536,252 Engineering $23,136 535.532 Other technical fields $20.748 533,324 Other nontechnical fields 521.360 532,376 Accounting 518,420 S31284 Doctorates, other advanced degrees 1980-81 1988-89 M.D.'s 564.400 596.100 D.D.S.'s $33.250 S60.410 J.D.'s, LLB.'s NA 535.814 Ph.D.'s _ S22.688 534,608 NA-NM avaYibla Nom Figures are 1989 ptallCtiats ewM for ID.'s, M.D.'s and DDS's. wtkh are aortal 1987 anvagas Figures for D.D s. saunes rate to genial Momone s under die age of 35, and rig M for ALD.'s refer M daaar- 36 rears old and you gar. t6MWR -41asic data: Michigan Stage Unnersiry, Ream" Timds 1988.81,19W& No western llnnersay, lineoursl-Endimff Repot 1980. 1989; National Assooaaon ter law Pla[erheq, American Dmtaf Assoaada4 Amer/ m MM" Assaaaum's Center for means PaK7 Naearch WHAT A DEGREE BUYS The eaming power of people with high - school rather than college diplomas has increasingly eroded over the last decade and a half. The gap could narrow again if a serious labor shortage develops. Expressed in 1987 dollar;, here is how the pay gap has widened - Mean eamings of 25 to34- year -wds Women 1975 1987 689 68% , Men 1 9751 s22A91 ,9x1 - _ 24% 1987 1$19,746 528 768 46% USNawa-- ea=data: The college Floaro Revienw. U.S. census Surm U.S.NEWS & WORLD REPORT. Sect. 25.1989 r I i in which a product is de- signed by computer and then goes into physical pro- duction, skipping the draft- ing and modeling phases. In his job with NCR Cor- poration, manufacturing engineer Jim Wallace, 27, is helping design a plant in Atlanta that will make elec- tronic cash registers using CIM technology. Among his duties: Laying out the factory, selecting equip- ment and developing the manufacturing processes. Manufacturing engineers need to know electrical, computer and mechanical principles plus math and physics. There are seven ac- credited undergraduate programs in manufacturing engineering and dozens of master's programs. LAw ■ Lawyers as a group will not be in short supply in the '90s But specialists in in- ternational business and the environment will be courted as business goes increasingly global and cleanup becomes a priority. PAY: 565,000- SB0,000 to start American business is booming —overseas. Com- panies such as AT &T, Du Pont, PepsiCo and Inter- national Paper have invest- ed some $7 billion in European ventures alone this year. American law firms are at their heels, eager to provide the exper- tise needed in the laws governing multi- national deals. An international lawver might help a client establish a distribu- tion network, buy out a foreign competi- tor or minimize taxes. The need for staff- ers to do such work will intensify in 1992, when the European Economic Community drops trade barriers be- tween its 12 member nations, creating one mega - marketplace where companies with inroads to one nation will have ac- cess to all. The best preparation is a background in liberal arts and business, with a law - school specialty in comparative law. A grasp of other countries' laws and of international treaties is essential. Time spent abroad and a foreign language are pluses, says Howard Stovall, 36, a for- NEWS YOU: aAW USE mer Peace Corps volpnteer in North Ye- men who speaks Arabic and is a Middle Eastern law specialist for Baker & McKenzie. a Chicago -based firm with 144 offices in 26 countries. Stovall recent- i ly helped structure a joint venture for a U.S. client planning to handle slag re- ; moval for a Middle Eastern steel plant. ' He also explained to the client local li- ability laws regarding possible mishaps. ; Says Stovall: "You need to understand cultural nuances. Islamic law empha- sizes fairness and might ban a deal favor- ; ing one party over another." Environmental lawyer As environ- mental cases are clogging court calendars. law firms are staffing up to handle the load. The environmental -law department at the I Washington. D.C., firm Crowell & Mor- ing has expanded from only four lawyers in 1978 to 12 today. In one recent case. attorney Bill Anderson was employed by a manufactur- ing company the EPA had tagged as a "potentially re- sponsible party" (PRP) in polluting a site where sev- eral other companies had also caned their waste. An- derson had to understand the toxicity of the chemi- cals to help the firm figure out its share of the cleanup tab and then negotiate with attorneys for the other PRP's to arrive at each one's obligation. He also helps clients formulate cleanup plans and defends those plans to the EPA. Environmental lawyers who choose to work in pri- vate practice generally de- fend the "black hats," or companies accused of pol- luting. Starting salaries in major cities can reach $85,000. Lawyers who pre- fer to do white -hat work instead, for a quarter to half that starting pay, can sign on with nonprofit groups, such as the Natural Resources Defense Coun- cil, which tend to sue gov- ernments or companies for failing to adhere to envi- ronmental laws. In. either case, you will need a back- ground in administrative and property law, federal regulations and litigation. Lawyers who have taken an engineering and a chem- istry course or two will have a leg up. Mediator To litigate is human, to mediate, divine. More people are begin- ning to see the virtue of steering clear of court. which puts mediators in the cat- bird seat. Seattle -based U.S. Arbitration & Mediation, for example, has grown from one office in 1984 to 34 offices todav and handles some 400 cases a month, says founder Michael Gillie. Mediators, who may or may not have a law degree, handle "kiss and make up" negotiations. As neutral problem solvers who work either in private practice or at public clinics, they gather facts from both sides, explain the legal options and consequences and encourage each party to bend toward compromise. Voluntary settlements are often reached within U.S.NEWS & WORLD REPORT, Sept 25.1989 69 hours or weeks, making mediation far speedier, less expensive and less trau- matic than a full- fledged court battle. Cases range from minor domestic squabbles to complex product- liability and mal- practice disputes. Increas- ingly, states are mandating mediation in certain types of cases, such as for child custody in California and farm- credit disputes in some grain -belt states. "In mediation, both parties can go away win- ners, and that feels very good," says Peter Loven- heim, a mediation attor- ney since 1985 and author of Mediate, Don't Litigate (McGraw -Hill, $19.95, available in October). One of Lovenheim's cases in- volved a dispute between two swimming -pool build- ers who each blamed the other for leaks in a pool they built for a kids' sum- mer camp. Lovenheim got the two firms to avoid a costly and embarrassing public suit by persuading them to agree to split the cost of materials and labor to finish the pool in time for the swimmers. Mediators are often so- cial workers or psycholo- gists who have completed 40 hours of mediation courses, which are taught for a minimal fee by many of the more than 300 public "alternative dispute resolu- tion" centers staffed by volunteers to mediate local cases, or for $700 to $800 by private firms such as CDR Associates in Boulder. Attorney mediators can go this route or take courses in law school, now taught at 174 schools, up from 43 in 1983. BUSINESS ■ Making employes happy will be a priori. ty in the '90s. so people in personnel may find the upward climb easier than will their peers in other departments Jobs in human resources should burgeon by 30 percent in the next 10 years and will advance a notch or two in the corporate hierarchy. Numan-resources manager Not so long ago. personnel admin- istration was a dead end. Personnel em. 70 ployes took job applications, kept salary records and enforced the workplace rules. But affirmative action, stiffer com- petition. the influx of working mothers and fewer entry -level workers have forced American firms to rethink the wav the-, • motivate.and manage their em- ployes. The result has been the human - resources manager. a new breed of per- sonnel administrator whose charge is to make employes content and productive. To make the workplace as hospitable and efficient as possible. for example. a human - resources manager might lobby for job sharing or flexible schedules. An M.B.A. is essential. as is time in various business disciplines such as sales and marketing. before anyone with an eye on the top personnel job settles into human resources. with broad experi- ence. the reasoning goes. you will have more empathy for the problems of other managers and more credi- bility when you advise them on making staff members more productive. Wages are rising, a mea- sure of corporate respect. The median pay for a hu- man- resources manager is $47.500, and salaries go as high as $112,000. But some things never change. Wanda Lee, vice president of human resources at Winchell's, a 650- outlet doughnut chain based in La Mirada, Calif., spends much of her time training shop managers in the art of resolving disputes with re- calcitrant employes, and setting up in -house coun- seling to help laid -off per- sonnel find jobs. She also still bears the ultimate re- sponsibility for planning the company picnic. Corporate trainer � Computer classes. Remedi- al training in the three R's. Preparation for overseas assignments. Training for managers whose formerly white -male work force is increasingly female and nonwhite. Employes in the business world spend so much time in company classrooms these days that people with the knowledge and skills to teach them are becoming as much. a part of the corporate team as accountants and mar- 1 keting experts. Outside class, trainers of- ten study the work force and pinpoint where skills are weak, then design ap- propriate courses. Sotr�e businesses set up their own train- ing institutes, while others contract out their training to consultants. About one third of trainers are in -house experts in subjects like engineering or computers who also have a knack for teaching. Other trainers are drawn from the ranks of former schoolteachers, though they may have a hard time crossing into industry unless they have taught adults before. Some 250 universities have human-re- sources degree programs . concentrating on training or adult education. Entrv- level salaries are around $25,000; the director of training in a major corporation can earn over $100.000. Basic - skills training will be especially critical to companies for the foreseeable U.S.NEWS & WORLD REPORT. Sept 25. 1989 r� i� future because qualified entry -level workers will be in short supply. Some companies even train potential new hires who would normally be considered un- employable. "I remember one woman, a single mother from the inner city, with serious deficiencies in reading, writing and math," says Ira Mozille, senior edu- cation adviser at Aetna Life & Casualty in Hartford, Conn. She completed the company's "hire and train" program, began work as a secretary and recently earned a promotion. Engineering that kind of triumph is what makes Mozille love his work. Reafth-care -,cast executive The cost of health benefits at Allied Signal was $355 million in 1987, up 39 percent from the year before. This year, costs are up less than 10 percent. The person responsible is Joseph Duva, Al- tied's health - care -cost manager, a new member of the executive team. At Allied and other Fortune 500 com- panies, these executives have launched a benefits revolution. Instead of paying out benefits —and paying and paying — they buy benefits. Typically, they negoti- ate a contract with a group of hospitals and physicians to provide health care for employes. By .guaranteeing the doctors and hospitals a set monthly fee, the com- panies get a price break. The employe frequently saves, too, since out -of- pocket expenses for this type.of plan are almost always lower. Negotiating discounts is only the first battle in the war to keep medical costs down. Cost managers have to keep an eagle eye out for other ways to save. When Charles Buck of General Electric. for example, saw that the rate of Caesar- ean sections for employes using a hospi- tal in Utica was unusually high, he noti- fied the hospital. If evidence is found that unnecessary Caesareans are per- formed, G.E. and employes stand to gain. Some companies require a doctor- employe-insurance carrier conference to determine whether a proposed hospital stay is truly necessary. The demand for skilled negotiators at ease with health -care and financial con- cerns is bound to skyrocket, as more companies recognize the benefit of man- aging their own benefits. Hospital and HMO administrators are prime candi- dates, says Michael Meyer, managing di- rector of Witt Associates. The salary outlook is rosy, ranging from 580.000 to $150,000. After all. six figures sounds insignificant compared with the millions that a health- care -cost executive can save a company. ■ by use J. Moore and Marc Silver NLINS.YCU: CAN USE CAREER PATHS When the next step up isjust beyond your reach Steven Anderson never put much stock in climbing the corporate lad- der, and why should he have'? Pro- motions just came naturally, at least at first. Starting with Ford Motor Company in 1971 as an entry -level engineer. he spent a decade there moving up the ranks of the engineering department. eventually making it to the first rung of middle management. Then. Ford began trim- ming its white- collar work force. Ander- son was not laid off and his salary was not a thorny breakdown in communications by organizing and running team meetings with members from various levels. That task exposed him to the company's inner workings and made him a visible player with the upper echelon. At 48. Anderson is again pumped up about his work. Anderson is lucky. After all. he was transferred. not demoted or fired. and during the 1980s more than 3 million jobs have been wiped out at Fortune :00 com- panies. Rare is the office in which people cut, but he lost privileges. duties and staff. are not asking themselves privately: Am I "My job became pretty insignificant. climbing the ladder fast enough:' Atn I says Anderson. "It hurt a lot.•' He mulled getting the money I desen•e" _am I even quitting, sank into a slump and about where I want to be? The answers may three years ago was transferred out of signal a job move or a change in careers. engineering into a department whose pn- Or they may indicate it is time to redefine mary role was to coordinate other depart - your philosophv of success. menu. His new boss, who had seen An- Sharp elbows. To remain at a career derson at his enthusiastic best years plateau is no automatic blemish. Phvsi- earlier when they worked on a computer cians. lawyers. teachers, artists and other project together. promised him leeway in ! professionals spend most of their work structuring his new job. "That's when I lives in one role. Nor does plateauing stopped feeling sorry for myself and gor i prove your performance is iliding. But creative again." says Anderson. He fixed particularly in corporate life. where suc- U.S.NEWS & WORLO REPORT. Sept. 25. 1989 71 47 —... . . J r C cess is measured by money and promotions, the 1990s will be a time of frustration as more good people elbow each other in a race for few- er good jobs. The 10 people currently vying for every middle - management spot will grow to 30 by 1995, says Ron Zemke, president of Performance Research Associates in Minneapolis. Fewer jobs mean slower promotions, maybe even none. A decade ago, white - male managers did not peak in their careers until 47; now, they top out between 40 and 42, says Judith Bardwick, a psychology professor, management consultant and author of The Plateauing Trap (American Management Association, 1986, $17.95). Minorities and women tend to plateau by age 38, says Bardwick, because of lin- gering racism and ,sexism on the job.' Today's yardstick. Mea- suring yourself by pay is hardly the simple exercise it once was. Inflation has wiped out the old rule of thumb that. you should be earning an amount equal to your age times $1,000. These days, valued and am- bitious workers earn annu- al raises averaging 15 per- cent, assuming 6 percent inflation, for their first 15 years of work, says Hap Vaughan, manager of ■ Geared up. Ford engineer Steven Anderson resented being moved to a job he considered pushing paper. An understanding boss gor him jump - started again. training for corporate facil- ities at Texas Instruments, Inc., in Dallas i and author of Your Career Game (John i Wiley & Sons, 1987, $12.95). That means a 22- year -old college graduate starting out at the current average salary of $18.000 for all newly degreed grads should be making close to $150,000 by the time he is 37, assuming he is a top performer. Vaughan's new "law of pay" dictates that after 15 years, a star should earn about four times as much as a new hire. For an average employe, on the other hand, pay usually peaks after 20 years, at 180 percent of the salary of ! someone just then starting out. None of this will help you win points with. your boss unless, of course. you really are a star. To set yourself apart; from your peers, you will have to show you can work better or smarter, and then do it by picking up new skills or broaden - j ing your interests. A marketing special- 72 ■ We beyond partner. Linda Gill Taylor hit 40 five years after making partner at a big Kansas City law firm. Realizing she had nowhere else to go them she starred her own business A year later, her temporary- legal- help firm is a success ist, for example. might develop an acu- men for reading balance sheets and profit- and -loss statements if promotions tend to emanate from the finance depart- ment. Employes who feel blocked and unchallenged should probably leave. "One of the best ways to move ahead in your career is to move." says Jeff Salz- man. cofounder of CareerTrack, a career - counseling firm based in Boulder, Colo. "Spending three years in a company is considered pretty stable. It wasn't 20 years aeo. but it is today." The research and interviewing that go into a possible move will also give you a better idea of what you are worth on the open market. Fleeing a plateaued past may sound enticing. but success in a second or third career is likelier when you can exploit talents already at vour command. Linda Gill Taylor of Kansas City, Mo., found a creative way to parlay 10 years as a lawyer into a new business, Of Counsel, Inc., that sup- plies lawyers temporarily to law firms and corporate legal departments. It is a field she knows well. After law school, she joined the big Kansas City law firm of Gage & Tucker in 1978 and was made partner just five years later. That became the dilemma. "Where do you go after partner ?" she asks. Realizing that at 40 she was not much younger than the men running her firm and her opportunities there were limited, she quit in April, 1988, and opened shop a month later. Nobody cares more than you do whether you are moving at the right speed or are in the. right job. Whatever your personal goals may be, it hardly hurts to devote 2 hours or so a week on small career - boosting steps. You might attend job - related semi- nars, or have lunch with a potential mentor or client and follow up with letters or telephone calls. You might refine your resume. Or you might start a "win file" of memos and docu- ments that track your ac- complishments. Then pass this reminder of your good works on to your boss a week before your perfor- mance evaluation. Being honest with your- self is essential. Every time one of your peers is pro- moted and you are not, swallow your disappointment and consider why. You may have been passed over for tempo- rary reasons that pose no threat to your career. For example, it may be an incon- venience to promote you because there is no obvious replacement. The truth is that everyone plateaus eventually, even CEO's and hard -core work addicts. Unpalatable though it may seem, slowing down the promotion pace has a good side. By rushing toward the executive suite, you may miss getting your hands Airty on the kinds of grubby but important details that, if mastered, would make you a better top dog. Reach- ing your natural plateau is preferable to overreaching and becoming the kind of person insiders deride as more evidence of the Peter Principle. ■ by Terri Thompson in New York U.S.NEWS & WORLD REPORT. Sept. 25, 1989 a' r —M ka� �� _r Igor" V9, 44 EMPPPPI Why It sue: arid". exec il - -41;7�, t. E�tl FT v lip :tl pp- Introduction Here's what to look for in this year's special report of key school statistics. By James R. Oglesby and Thomas A. Shannon Main Events FM7 A review of the news —and the newsmakers —that are making 1989 an important year for education. By Pat Ordovenshy Leadership Our annual profile of local school leaders —plus your opinions on school problems, governance issues. and school -based management. Innumeracy 1�9 A hard look at U.S. students' poor showing on international math assessments —and at proposals to reform mathematics education. Buildings and Bonds Why some school leaders believe the current boom in school construction might be a case of too little. too late. Common Measures Our yearly report on the ups and downs of test scores, dropout rates, and other traditional yardsticks of school success. State of the States AA20 Up- to-the- minute comparative data on important trends in education. region by region and state by state. EDUCATION EDITOR-IN-CHIEF VITAL SIGNS AND ASSOCIATE PUBLISHER VOLUME V GREGG W. DOWNEY EXECUTIVE PUBLISHER MANAGING EDITOR THOMAS A. SHANNON SALLY BANKS ZAKARIYA PUBLISHER SENIOR EDITOR DON E. BLOM MARILEE C. RIST ASSOCIATE EDITORS JAMES BETCHKAL DEL STOVER PUBLISHER 1479 -1989 DONNA HARRINGTON- LUEKER ASSISTANT EDITOR ANDREW TROTTER PROIECT WRITER JUDITH BRODY SAKS DESIGNER ROBERT A. SOULE 1989 PRODUCTION MANAGER National School Boards Association BONNIE BECKER EDITORIAL SERVICES ASSISTANT STACY MARBERT SECRETARY TO THE EDITOR MICHELE SABATIER DIRECTOR OF CIRCULATION ALVIN BROCKWAY CIRCULATION STAFF SUE G. IRONS BETTY WINKLER MARY KAY SEYMOUR CHRISTOPHER WILEY JOHN BOYLE ANGELA GREEN ADVERTISING DIRECTOR J. MICHAEL DISANTO ADVERTISING OFFICE MANAGER LYNDSAY ANDREWS EDITORIAL AND CIRCULATION OFFICES. In the metropolitan Washington. D.C. area: 1 b8 Duke Street. Alexandria. Va. 22314: 703/838.6722. ADVERTISING OFFICES. National: 1680 Duke St.. Alexandria. Va. 22314: 703 %838-6210. East: 1680 Duke St., Alexandria. Va. 22311: 70 318 3 8 -6 2 2 7: loan Goetzinger. district manager. Midwest: Northfield Plaza. Suite 300. Northfield. III. 60093: 312/441 -2604: Rick Arkush. district manager. West: R.W. Walker Co,. Inc. 2 7l o Ocean Park Blvd.. Suite 1010. Santa Monica. Calif. 90105: 2131450.9001: Tom Midgley. district manager. New products: 1680 Duke SL. Alexandria. Va. 22314: Jim Collins. new produce coordinator: 703/8386724. A3 E 0 u C A T 1 0 N V I T A L S 1 G N S 1 9 8 9 I 1 9 9 0 by Pat Ordovenshy he magic word for the year is choice. The hottest, or at least most- discussed. trend in education during the last 12 months is the phenomenon of allowing students a wide selection of public schools and public school districts from which they can choose one to attend. The roots of the trend are in Minnesota, where choice extends to every school district in the state. The Minnesota plan, now in its third year of a gradual phase -in, this year requires every school district with more than 1,000 students to accept anyone who applies from anywhere in the state. Going with the student to the new district is between $3,000 and $3,500 in per - capita state aid. For the smaller districts, choice is voluntary this year, mandatory next September. The Minnesota plan. and its clones appear- ing across the U.S.. is one of three embryonic efforts stirring in education this year that could significantly reshape schooling in the 1990s. A second is national standards for teacher certification. In Detroit. the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. born of a Carnegie Foundation study and nurtured by Carnegie grants, moves inexorably toward a national certification process due by 1993. Its first guidelines for certification standards were out this summer. A third is state- by-state comparisons of student achievement. In Washington, the U.S. Education Department IEDI works with the Council of Chief State School Officers to develop a national test that will be the centerpiece of a national scoreboard. ranking the schools of all 50 states. The first national test. in eighth grade mathematics. will be administered to a sample of 2.000 students per state next February. The first national scoreboard. ranking the 38 states that have volunteered to participate. will be out a year later. Choice controversy In Minnesota. the choice plan sired by Governor Rudy Perpich. along with its many imitators. has produced some predictable controversy. Some school administrators and school board members say the politicians hidden agenda is consolidation. that choice is a politically safe way to force small school districts to lose students. lose money and merge with larger neighbors. Indeed. in a few oases. consolidation already has occurred. Other Minnesota school officials say choice is being exercised for reasons unrelated to school quality. Superintendent Richard Berge in Faribault. 50 miles south of Minneapolis. says he's getting new high school students who want to play on his hockey team, the only one in the area. In the affluent suburb of St Louis Park. Superintendent Carl Holmstrom last spring said 80 parents asked to transfer into his district and 70 requested a transfer out. More than 90 percent of the requests. he said. were for parent convenience —where the baby-sitter lives. for example.. Others mention boys who want to go to school with their girl friends. or choice d'amour. Minnesota teachers. especially those who lost their jobs through mergers. feel so strongly about choice that they persuaded the mid- Pat Ordovensky is an education writer for USA Today. Id1=l ,eacher Salaries (annual average) 1988 -89 1983 -84 1978 -79 514,681: S15,450 A4 E D U C A T 1 0 N V I T A L 5 1 G N 5 i 9 8 9 / 1 9 9 0 summer convention of the National Education Association (N.E:.A.I to spurn the wishes of outgoing President Mary Hatwood Futrell and vote to oppose statewide choice plans wherever they appear. Futrell unsuccessfully pushed for a more moderate policy that would have allowed the union to consider each choice plan on its merits. The N.E.A. will keep busy opposing choice. Programs similar to Minnesota's have been approved in Arkansas. Iowa. and Nebraska. Although proposals for school choice died this year in the Colorado. New Mexico. and Idaho legislatures. proposals are pending in 13 states: Arizona. California. Georgia. Hawaii. Massachusetts. Michigan. Mississippi. New Jersey. New York. North Carolina. Ohio. Oklahoma. and Wisconsin. Chris Pipho. who monitors such things for the Education Commission of the States. points out that none of the statewide choice plans provides money for student transportation. That makes them choice. says Pipho. only for students who can afford them. Comparing states Controversy also surrounds the movement toward the national state-by-state scoreboard. Many of the chief state school officers who voted to push on with the scoreboard in the mid -1980s no longer are in office. and their successors aren't sure they like the idea of comparisons with their neighbors. Gary Phillips. the point man planning the national test for ED. says state officials are unhappy because "we're doing to them what they've been doing to their school districts for years — testing them and ranking them:' One who's especially unhappy is Stan Bemkopf. Georgia's testing director. who asks: "You really think this is going to improve educa- tion? Are you kidding? Twenty to thirty years from now people will look back and say it, too. has passed:' E Elementary • �V♦ 4 Seconoary •• ♦�• =d • �♦ C Total : *0 ♦�• • Source %ational Educat;on Assoc at.on Accepting the idea. however. is Paul Sandifer. South Carolina's education research director. who says: "The public wants the information. Whether it's usable Ifor education purposesl is another issue. The public has a right to know how we stack up with our neighbors:' Says ED's Phillips: "It will shed some light on the states that do well and shed some heat on the states that do poorly.' Step two comes in 1992 when eighth graders again are tested in math and fourth graders in math and reading. By then. Phillips hopes all 50 states will be in the fold. The 12 that declined to participate this year. for financial or political reasons. are Alaska. Kansas. Maine. Massachusetts. Mississippi. Missouri. New York. South Dakota, Tennessee. Utah. Vermont. and Washington. Also in the news As the 1980s end. so obviously does the era of reform reports. The deluge of documents analyzing and criticizing schools that followed the thunder and lightning of A Nation at Risk back in 1983 has slowed to a trickle. The National Assessment of Educational Progress tried to fill the gap by analyzing its findings over the last 20 years and looking for trends (see "Common Measures:' page A 16). It concluded that students are doing well when it comes to learning the basics in mathematics. reading. writing, and science but stumbling when they are asked to apply that knowledge. Most notable in the 1989 trickle was a report from the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics that proposes standards for teaching math that will make our students competitive with youth of other countries. Among its recommendations are a heavy reliance on calculators even in the early grades. group approaches to problem solving to teach the importance of cooperation. and access to a computer for every student Isee 1nnumeracy.' page A91. The Education Writers Association checked in with its survey of the condition of school buildings and its conclusion was "shoddy." The report. written by E.w.A :s Anne Lewis. finds 25 percent of U.S. schools obsolete. overcrowded. or unsafe and another 33 percent headed in that direction because of deferred maintenance or booming enrollments (see "Bonds and Buildings :' page A 121. Individual research on the campuses also produced some headlines this year: • Lorrie Shepard of the University of Colorado's Graduate School of Education came up with some dramatic findings questioning the validity of first grade readiness tests. a growing national trend. Shepard. using control groups of students who "flunked" the test but went on AS E D U C A T 1 o N v i T A L 5 i G N S 1 9 8 9 1 l 9 9 D to first grade anyway. found no difference in achievement or maturity between them and students who passed the test. • Two University of Michigan researchers. Valerie Lee and Carolee Stewart. broke out math and science scores for Catholic school students on the 1986 National Assessment of Educational Progress and found the Catholic kids doing better. across the board at all age levels. than their public school counterparts. They drew no conclusions. however, about why Catholic school kids have the academic edge. • Simultaneous work by researchers at the Universitv of Illinois and New York University show racial and ethnic gaps in achievement begin to disappear when students have equal access to computers. "The computer has the potential to be a powerful compensating tool:' says Cindy Okolo of the University of Illinois. "We now have the data to support that, but we're not sure we understand why." • The 23rd annual survey of college freshmen by U.c.L.A:s Alexander Astin finds that the stress level of college -bound high school graduates was at an all -time high last year Fewer than ever believe they are emotionally healthy. and more than ever say they feel "over- whelmed" by academic pressure. Another indicator of rising stress. Astin notes. is that 10.1 percent of the 1988 -89 freshmen say they smoke. up from 8.7 percent a year earlier. A new direction for education's largest organization, the 1.9- million member N.E.A.. was signaled in July when the 8.500 delegates to the teacher union's annual convention elected Keith .o N N H m A /V A• m N /V H /V r b O m Geiger vice president for six years. as its new president. Geiger, a former mathematics teacher who came up through the militant Michigan teacher union. said he'll concentrate N. E.A:s attention immediately on the 17 states that don't allow collective bargaining for teachers. Outgoing President Futrell. ineligible to run again. successfully downplayed N.EA S once - militant image during her six years at its helm and forged a new role for the union as a key player in developing professional standards. Geiger. while outlining his new course. also insisted he is firmly committed to continuing Futrell's initiatives. Finally, an interesting diversion for education in 1989 came from Chris Whittle. head of Whittle Communications. who developed a 12- minute newscast he wants to pipe in daily to U.S. schools. His show raised the ire of almost all establishment organizations because it includes two minutes of paid commercial advertising. Whittle's lure for school officials is several thousand dollars worth of electronic equipment. including a satellite dish, for every school that signs up. As the 1989 -90 school year dawned. many administrators and school board members were finding that lure irresistible. N •p Chart 2 ❑ Student Distribution (in thousands) D° Of Off IV b f�f 'S:�■ ■'CFO+■ � � �"' PK-8 _ _ 9 -12;�s ' `"� " PK-8 9-12 Total school -age enrollment Public school ,Nonpublic school enrollment I • Estimated figures Source: National Center for Education statistics E D U C A T 1 O N v t T a L S t G N S t 9 8 9 I t 9 9 0 adership Y.. = eorge Bush might vow to be the "Education President;' but the public still wants you — school leaders at the local level - ` to be in charge. A 1986 study of school boards conducted by the Institute for Educational Leadership noted that t = G the U.S. public "strongly supports the concept of local governance of education through the school board:' •, -tom Chart 3 gives a demographic profile of the school board t members to whom the public has entrusted the schools. And as the comparative data from 1983 show, local school leaders have changed remarkably little in the past half - decade. Today. as in 1983. the typical school board member is a man in his forties who earns a financially comfortable income (which now stands between $40.000 and $49.999), and lives in a suburban or rural community. Although school populations have grown increasingly diverse over the years, the complexion of the local school board has remained basically the same— white. Ethnic and minority representation on school boards remains low. Note. though. one significant change: The percentage of women. which had been climbing steadily in the past few years to a peak of 39 percent in 1987. dropped to 31.9 percent in 1988. Whether fewer women are seeking board seats —or fewer are being selected —will require further study. As in previous years. school board mem- bers' greatest concern is the lack of financial support for schools. Declining enrollment. the Number Two concern five years ago. has ceded that position to a growing concern about meeting state mandates. This year. a new study— Profile of School Board Presidents in the U.S.. conducted by the National Center for Education Information — has added some interesting brushstrokes to this picture of school boards. For example. 58 percent of respondents to that study said they believe the authority of the local school board has decreased over the last five years. Who has the authority now? The state, according to 89 percent of that group of respondents. Sixty -two percent said they want the state government to have less influence on the local public schools. and 59 percent also want the federal government to keep hands off local schools. The study also found that the majority of school boards currently make decisions about the total school system budget. teacher dismissal. principal selection and dismissal. and disciplinary policy. In other areas. boards want more decision- making.power: For example. although 38 percent of respondents said their boards currently make decisions on class size, 49 percent said they believed the school board should have that responsibility. Data for Chart 3 are derived from the annual study of school board members con- ducted jointly by Virginia Tech and The American School Board Journal. Results from this year's survey are being analyzed now for presentation in the January 1990 issue of the Journal. A similar study of school administrators is conducted jointly by the State University of New York at Buffalo and The Executive Educator. A report of this survey will appear in the Novem- ber issue of The Exenrtive Educalor. but selected 1989 data are previewed here in Chart 4. Demographically school administrators- A7, E D u C A T 1 0 N V i T A L S 1 G N S 1 9 8 9 r 1 9 9 a Chart 3 0 Profile of School Board Members Sex 1983 1988 Male 62.9% 68.1% Female 37.1 31.9 Ethnic Background 17.7 15.4 Black 2.8% 3.4% White 93.1 93.7 Hispanic 1.5 1.3 American Indian .8 .7 Asian .2 .3 Other 1.7 .3 Ace Under25 .1% .2% 26 -35 9.4 7.3 36 -40 17.7 15.4 41 -50 37.3 44.5 51 -60 24.8 20.0 Over 60 10.7 12.6 Income Less than S20,000 8.1% 3.4% $20,000 - 529,999 18.4 7.9 $30,000 - 539,999 20.1 15.6 $40,000- 549,999 19.6 17.5 $50,000 - 559,999 13.8 15.7 560,000 - 569,999 5.1 11.0 570,000 - 579,999 3.6 7.6 580,000 - 589,999 3.2 4.6 $90,000- 599,999 .1.1 3.3 More than 100,000 6.8 10.0 Where board members live 1983 1988 Small town 34.4% 26.1% Suburb 30.5 29.0 Rural area 21.7 28.7 Urban area 10.5 10.8 Board members' worries 1983 1988 1. Lack of financial support 1. Lack of financial support 2. Declining enrollment 2. State mandates 3. Parents' lack of interest 3. Curriculum development 4. Finding good teachers 4. Facilities S. Teachers' lack of interest S. Use of drugs 6. Use of drugs 6. Declining enrollment 7. Poor curriculum /standards 7. Management/leadership 8. Lack of discipline 8. Parents' lack of interest 9. Pupils' lack of interest/ 9: Collective bargaining truancy 10. Disrespect for students/ 10. Large schools/ teachers overcrowding Source: The American School Board loumal Chart 4 El Profile of Administrators - 1989 Elementary High school school Sex Superintendents principals principals Male 95% 90:6 68% Female 5 10 32 Ethnic background Black 2% 5% 7:6 White 96 93 91 Hispanic 1 2 2 Other 1 - - Ace Under 30 30 -35 1% 7% 6% 36 -41 12 23 22 42 -47 26 30 27 48 -55 38 27 30 S6 -65 22 13 14 Over 65 1 - 1 Years in current iob 1 year or less 11% 11% 9% 2 -3 years 29 31 19 4-5 years 20 15 14 More than 5 years 40 43 58 Percentage who consider compensation adequate 2 4 57% 41% 37% Assessment of iob securi None 3% 4% 2% Little 12 14 6 Some 45 48 38 A great deal 40 34 54 Percentage who entered education intending to be school administrators - - 26% 23% 19% Political affiliations Democrat 35% 41% 49% Republican 42 31 33 Independent 21 24 14 Other - - - None 2 4 4 Political classification Conservative 76% 75% 66% Liberal 24% 25% 34% Elementary Source: The Executive Educator High school school Superintendents principals principals Opinion on where school decisions are best made In the central office 20% 4% 3% At the building level 80 96 97 Say school -based management is planned or in effect In effect 30% 28:5 22% Being planned 27 22 28 Neither 43 50 50 Source: The Executive Educator ail 5 ❑ Increase in School Executive Salaries Position $71,190 $68,174 , Superintendents (contract salary) $56,894 Assistant supts. $43,555 $41,086 Subject area supervisors $45,909. $43.664 Principals Elementary school $49,427 $47,078 ncipals iighlmiddle school $52,987 -- $50,512 Principals High school $38,360 $36,364 Assistant principals Elementary school Percent increase 4.4 4.9 6.0 5.1 4.9 4.9 5.5 $40,093 Assistant principals _ Jr. high /middle school $44,002 $41,839 Assistant principals � High School C 1988 -89 average annual salary J 1987 -88 average annual salary 5.5 5.2 like school board members -remain overwhelm- ingly white. male, and middle aged. But times might be beginning to change on at least one of those fronts: women now account for 10 percent of high school principals surveyed. up from 3 percent last year. Also of note are comparisons among the three categories of administrators surveyed. For example. superintendents are happier with their salaries 157 percent consider their compensation adequate) than are principals (41 percent of high school principals and 37 percent of elementary school principals call their compensation adequate). On the question of job security, the common wisdom notwith- standing. more high school principals ( 18 percent) than superintendents ( 15 percent) say they have little or no job security. A major focus of this year's study is school- based management, which is in effect or being planned inclose to half of the school systems represented by the respondents. But predic- tabiy. some disagreement is evident on the matter of where school decisions are best made: Elementary and high school principals are almost unanimous 197 percent and 96 percent, respectively) in saying school decisions should be made at the building level. but a full 20 percent of the superintendents opt. instead. for the central office as the locus for school decision making. Finally. a look at the compensation school executives receive: Chart 5 shows the average salaries paid to school executives in all major job categories and indicates the rate of increase in compensation this year. Chart 6 shows average salaries for selected job titles broken out by both enrollment and per -pupil expenditure. Chart _6 ❑ What School Executives Earn Salaries by enrollment 1988-89 Enrollment Group Position orfunction ' :° ,,:. -:. ; - ' : 25,000 10,000 2,500 300 Total -all (full time staff) r _ or to ;: to ' .: A8 E „ _ A T 1 0 N t i T A t 5 1 C N 5 1 9 a 9 9 9 0 like school board members -remain overwhelm- ingly white. male, and middle aged. But times might be beginning to change on at least one of those fronts: women now account for 10 percent of high school principals surveyed. up from 3 percent last year. Also of note are comparisons among the three categories of administrators surveyed. For example. superintendents are happier with their salaries 157 percent consider their compensation adequate) than are principals (41 percent of high school principals and 37 percent of elementary school principals call their compensation adequate). On the question of job security, the common wisdom notwith- standing. more high school principals ( 18 percent) than superintendents ( 15 percent) say they have little or no job security. A major focus of this year's study is school- based management, which is in effect or being planned inclose to half of the school systems represented by the respondents. But predic- tabiy. some disagreement is evident on the matter of where school decisions are best made: Elementary and high school principals are almost unanimous 197 percent and 96 percent, respectively) in saying school decisions should be made at the building level. but a full 20 percent of the superintendents opt. instead. for the central office as the locus for school decision making. Finally. a look at the compensation school executives receive: Chart 5 shows the average salaries paid to school executives in all major job categories and indicates the rate of increase in compensation this year. Chart 6 shows average salaries for selected job titles broken out by both enrollment and per -pupil expenditure. Chart _6 ❑ What School Executives Earn Salaries by enrollment 1988-89 Source: Educational Research Service, Inc. n Source:::.uational Research Service, Inc. Enrollment Group Position orfunction ' :° ,,:. -:. ; - ' : 25,000 10,000 2,500 300 Total -all (full time staff) r _ or to ;: to ' .: to reporting . - = :more . -- 24,999 9,999 : : :: 2,499 systems-. Supts. (contiractsal.) $90,110 , -. $77,046 ' - $70,194 $59,383 $71,190 Deputy/assoc supts. , $71,252 $65,741 $62,852 _ -" " $47,802 $66,214 Assistantsupts. - = - _ :._. $63,978 $61,851 : " $58,771 $53,037 $59,655 Principals :< $53,987 -- $50,228 $46,142 - $45,272 Elementary school $48,098 $47,162 - $46,770 _ .- $42,793 $45,909 Jr. high/middle school -_ $50,911 $50,606 .. $50,529 $45,742 $49,427 Highschool :.:;: ;: ;,... ,N. i .;`. _- $55,991 $55,167 .:_: $54,592 __. _ $47,612.: $52,987 =.. Salaries by per -pupil ependRure 1988 -89 Source: Educational Research Service, Inc. n Source:::.uational Research Service, Inc. Per-pupil expenditure level Position or function $6,000 $5,000 $4,000 $3,500 Less Total -all (full- timestaff) or -to - to to . _ than reporting more $5,999 $4,999 $3,999 $3,500 systems , Supts. (contract salary) $79,737 $75,039 $71,391 $70,455 $67,404 $71,190 Deputy/assoc- supts. $73, 568 $71, 664 $68,872 $64,553 $61,635 $66,214 Assistant supts. $68,794 $62,070 $60,663 $59,382 $55,077 $59,655 Prindpals Elementaryschool .., $53,987 -- $50,228 $46,142 - $45,272 $42,154 $45,909 Jr. high/middle school `.. : `: $59,256 $53,728 $50,023 = $48,406 $44,992 $49,427 -L High school - - �= . $62,187 $56,108 $53,302 = " $52,252 $48,867 $52,987 Source: Educational Research Service, Inc. n Source:::.uational Research Service, Inc. V -r A9 E 0 u C o T 1 0 N v i T A l S i G N S 9 8 9 1 9 9 0 Innumeracy tudents in the U.S. scored at or near the bottom of a six - 9 w = - nation international mathematics and science assessment last y: winter— results that suggest mathematics education in this country just isn't adding up. The assessment, administered by A -_; the Educational Testing Service, was given to 24.000 13 -year- r_- olds from Ireland, Korea, Spain, the United Kingdom, the U.S., and four Canadian provinces. yr To no one's surprise, South Koreans were at the top of the �= heap in mathematics. Only 40 percent of the U.S. students tested could perform two -step math problems, compared to 78 percent of the South Korean students. Forty percent of Korea's 13- year -olds understood measurement and geometry concepts and were successful at solving complex problems: less than 10 percent of U.S. students demonstrated those same skills (see Charts 7 and 8). In science. 70 percent of the Korean and British Columbian students showed proficiency in using scientific procedures and analyzing data. but fewer than 40 percent of the U.S.. students performed at the same level. U.S. students were only slightly ahead of students from Ireland and French - speaking students in Ontario and New Brunswick, who were ranked at the bottom in science. In response to this and other growing evidence of low science and mathematics achievement among U.S. students, the mathe- matics and education communities in this country have launched a cooperative effort to reform math education. In its recent report. Everybody Counts. the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences has called for nothing less than a sweeping overhaul of mathematics instruction and has proposed, among other things, that teachers make greater use of hand -held calculators to help students think mathematically rather than simply memorize math facts. . Mathematics. the report argues, plays a special role in school education: Students need to understand and be able to do math to compete for jobs in science and technology. And, careers aside. they need to develop math literacy to understand the growing mathematical content of newspapers and other written mate- rials. "High - school graduates need to know enough about chance to understand health and environmental risks: enough about data and experiments to understand the grounds for scientific conclusions: enough about represen- tation to interpret graphs: and enough about the nature of mathematics to be supportive parents to their children. who will learn aspects of mathematics that their parents never studied:' the report says. But few U.S. high school students take the courses they need to become literate in mathematics, according to Everybody Counts. From eighth grade through graduate school, on average, the percentage of all students taking mathematics decreases by half for each year of schooling. And. the report notes. the percentage of top high school seniors who express an interest in majoring in math in college has declined by more than 50 percent since 1975. Last spring, the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics 1N.C.TM.1 published new standards to help students become mathematically literate —the first effort ever to establish national expectations for school mathematics. N.CVWS goals: Students should learn to value math. to become mathematical %.hart 7 El Percentages Performing At or Above Each Level of the Mathematics Scale, Age 13 * Korea Quebec (French) British Columbia Quebec (English) New Brunswick (English) Ontario (English) New Brunswick (French) Spain United Kingdom ' -4nd .rio (French) United States Source: Educational Testing Service A7101 E _ A 7 1 0 N v i T A L S 1 G N S 1 9 a 9 1 1 9 9 0 problem solvers. and to reason and communi- cate mathematically. Specific recommendations include the following: • Grades K -4: Actively involve children in doing mathematics: emphasize the applications of mathematics: and make appropriate and ongoing use of calculators and computers. • Grades 5 -8: Place more emphasis on open -ended and e\tended problem solving. and less on routine. one-step problems: pay increased attention to estimating and using measurement: and decrease emphasis on memorizing. �.4 • Grades 9 -12: Pay more attention to statistics and probability and use of real -world problems and applications in algebra and geometry. Without such reforms, mathematics educators say. the U.S. could become a nation of mathematical illiterates. And in fact. in his widely acclaimed book. I nmuneracy: Mathematical Illiteracy and Its Consequences. John Allen Paulos. a mathematics professor at Temple University, suggests we're well on the way. Paulos argues that the inability to deal comfortably with the "fundamental notions of number and chance" plagues far too many Americans. Innumeracy has social costs, he says: It results in misinformed government policies. confused personal decisions. and 95 78 L° E E as 73 a. N c O 69 24 a G a y N O G 95 65 E N d N Q 16 1 O O 58 • Grades 9 -12: Pay more attention to statistics and probability and use of real -world problems and applications in algebra and geometry. Without such reforms, mathematics educators say. the U.S. could become a nation of mathematical illiterates. And in fact. in his widely acclaimed book. I nmuneracy: Mathematical Illiteracy and Its Consequences. John Allen Paulos. a mathematics professor at Temple University, suggests we're well on the way. Paulos argues that the inability to deal comfortably with the "fundamental notions of number and chance" plagues far too many Americans. Innumeracy has social costs, he says: It results in misinformed government policies. confused personal decisions. and 100 95 78 40 E 100 as 73 ?+ 2 c 95 69 24 2 100 a 67 c O 100 95 65 18 N d 92 Q 16 1 100 95 58 12 < 1 99 91 O 14 1 O 87 O 18 100 95 78 40 5 100 97 73 22' 2 100 95 69 24 2 100 97 67 20 1 100 95 65 18 1 99 92 58 16 1 100 95 58 12 < 1 99 91 57 14 1 98 87 55 18 2 98 86 55 14 <1 99 85 40 7 0 97 78 40 9 1 .�r`i A11 E 0 u C A T 1 0 N V I T A L S I G N S i 9 8 9 1 1 9 9 0 increased susceptibility to easy answers of all kinds. If we were 'numerate:' he says, we could rationally look at social and economic issues. Although Paulos did not set out to critique mathematics education. he does say that "early mathematics education is generally poor." Most students learn their arithmetic tables in elemen- tary school. he acknowledges. but "many do pass through without understanding that if one drives at 35 m.p.h. for four hours. one will have driven 140 miles...:' Although agreement is widespread that mathematics education urgently needs reform- ing. so is the realization that the road will be long. State and local school boards have to accept and implement new standards: super- intendents must provide the climate and resources for curricular change: teachers have to be willing to learn new ways of teaching: parents have to demand higher quality mathematics education. "Real change requires action by everyone involved in mathematics education :' says the National Research Council report. "There is plenty of work for everyone:' Ka QL Bri QL Ne Or Ne Sp Ur Ire Or Ur Sol MALE FEMALE cr _.,art 9 0 School Bonds, K -12 (by volume in billions of dollars) Source: The Bond Buyer Note: These are tax- exempt municipal bonds with a maturity of more than 13 montns. These bongs are used for all types of school construc- tion ano renovation. 19a4 4) 0 E 0 U C A T 1 0 N V i T A L S 1 G N S 1 9 a 9 1 1 9 9 0 B u�ldin9s andBonds M70MIRR he U.S. is in the midst of its greatest school construction boom since the early 1970s. But even as school leaders watch layers of bricks and mortar rise from the ground, many are concerned the current level of school construction might be too little and too late. Many fear they simply cannot keep up with the massive need for new construction and renovation — or the escalating costs. From 1983 to 1987, the actual dollar value of new construction rose from $3.6 billion to $6.2 billion, an increase of 72 percent nationwide, according to the Bureau of the Census (see Chart 10). An annual survey conducted by American School and University (A.S. &U.) magazine, whose 1987 figure is somewhat higher than the federal govern- ment's, says school system spending on construction and renovation increased from $6.6 billion in 1987 to $7.9 billion in 1988 —up 19.7 percent in a single year. And more construction is in the pipeline: modernization, or replacement, and that local School systems are projected to spend $26 school systems might not be able to foot the bill. billion on new construction and renovation Age and neglect — coupled with enrollment between 1989 and 1991. A.S. &U. predicts. New growth. laws requiring greater safety, and buildings will account for 47.6 percent of that demands for better facilities have created the figure, and modernizations 21 percent —a sharp current problem. According to Wolves at the contrast with the 1988 figures of 37 percent for Schoolhouse Door, a recent study by the Education new buildings and 29 percent for renovation. Writers Association IE.wA.►. 20 percent of U.S. After 1991, though, the picture might be less school buildings are more than 50 years old: rosy. Several reports say the need for school 51 percent were constructed during the 1950s construction —and the problem of paying for it— and 1960s: and only 6 might become the education issue of the next ' percent were built Increase from 1983 to 1987: decade. Experts writing in the Journal of Education during the 1980s 72 percent ,; Finance. for example. note that a sizable propor- (see Chart 11 I. tion of U.S. school buildings is in need of repair. Arlq� Chad 10 E2 School Construction — Value of New Construction Put in Place, 1983 -87, Primary and Secondary Schools ({11(IIIOnS Of dollars) Increase from 1983 to 1987: :e ° 31 percent Source: Bureau of the Census _ Increase from 1983 to 1987: Increase from 1983 Increase from 1983 to 1987: 162 percent T to 1987: 80 percent 123 percent ONO _q N � N l96� &1 BS 66 87 !A� B4 Bf B6 B7 /99� B4 BS B6 B7 1983 B4 Bf B6 B1 19d� B4 BS B6 B1 � _N E D u C A T 1 0 N v i T A L S 1 G N s 1 9 8 9 9 9 0 6 rl i1 G Q One out of every four school buildings is in inadequate condition. the report notes. Of those. 61 percent need maintenance or major repairs. 43 percent are obsolete. 42 percent have environmental hazards. 25 percent are overcrowded. and 13 percent are structurally unsound (see Chart 12). The report estimates a backlog of $41 billion worth of school maintenance and repair. The total price tag, according to the E.W.A. report, is a whopping $125 billion -584 billion in new construction and retrofitting of older buildings. plus $41 billion for deferred mainte- nance and major repairs. Where will the money come from? Traditionally, school bonds have been $1e major source of funding for construction. After a dip in 1987, the dollar volume of school bonds rose to $11. 1 billion in 1988 —back up to its 1986 high (see Chart 9). For the first quarter of 1989. school bonds were the leading category of municipal bonds. ahead of such categories as transportation, public power. and hospital bonds. But compared with the first quarter of 1988. school bonds were down by 17 percent. Bond experts say, however. that the overall market also was down: they expect the volume of school bonds to jump when interest rates begin to decrease. But school bonds, tied as they are to voter approval. can be a risky business. Although bond approval rates rose slightly in the last few years (from 76.6 percent in 1986 to 79.8 percent in 1988). citizens have repeatedly voted down bond referendums in some areas. And even when voters are willing to support a bond issue. legal limits generally placed on a school system's bond indebtedness might mean the system cannot fund needed construction projects. One solution might lie in greater state participation in funding construction. Currently. according to the E.WA. report, states pay an average of 23 percent toward construction costs. States estimate that combined state and local services will meet only 54 percent of the need in the 1989 -90 school year and only 39 percent in 1991 -92. School systems also should explore alternatives to new construction, such as installing portable classrooms: reopening dosed schools: redistributing grades among elemen- tary middle, and high schools: using double sessions. and opening schools year -round. The answers aren't easy. but you'll have to find them: The children keep coming. More babies were born in the U.S. in 1988 than in any other year since 1964. Those children will begin arriving at your schoolhouse door in 1993 —and if your schools offer prekindergarten classes, they'll be there even sooner. Chart I 1 2 Age of Buildings Nationally Number of buildings = 40,118 (46% of national total. 1987) Based on data from 15 states: Cr. DE, FLT IL, MN, MI, NE, NY, NC, ON, OK, PA, WV, WI, WY Source: Education Writers Association, 1988 survey. 30 25 01 .5 20 Z m 15 0 a E 10 Z 5 10.9% n= 359 26% „o n- I [ 10,295 n = 10,108 Pre-1899 1899 -39 1940 -49 1950 -59 1960 -69 1970 -79 1980 -88 Chart 12 0 Condition of Buildings Nationally and Problem Areas Source: Education Association, sim National \ Association of State Directors of Education Plant Services, 1988 sturef,1988 Digest of Good Education Statistics (ED). 42% n = 23,433 Adequate x, n + 18 18,, 400 hudequate 25% n= 14,259 `� - Need Maintenance -61 i Based on data from 28 states: AK, CA, CO, Cr. DE, FL, GA, IL, KS, KY, LA, ME, MD, MA, MN, MO, MS, NE, NC, ON, OK, PA, RI, TN, TX, UT, WA, WY. Number of buildings - 56,092 (64% of national total, 1987) Unsound Structures-13% Overcrowded -25% Obsolete -43% Environmental hazards -42% ,rt132 ,.T. Score Averages (by school year) Source: College i y, E D U C A T 1 0 N V I T A L S I G N S 1 9, a 9 I 1 9 9 0 CommonMeasures tagnant" is the term U.S. Education Secretary Lauro F. Cavazos has for U.S. education this year. Somewhat more diplomatically, the National Assessment of Educational Progress (N.A.1 =P) says American education is at a "crossroads" Students have made gains in basic skills in core subjects such as reading, writing, mathematics, and science, according to N.A.E.P., but it might take "funda- mental changes in curriculum and instruction" to move students beyond those basic skills to higher levels of thinking and reasoning. Here is a look at this year's key test scores, dropout rates, drug -use rates, and other common measures of the state of education. Test scores National scores on the Scholastic Aptitude Test (S.A.T.) devined slightly from 1987 to 1988. although the scores of most ethnic groups continued to rise. In 1988, the national average verbal score fell two points, to 428: the national average math score stayed the same at 476 Board Soo (see Chart 13). Average verbal scores for women 490 476 fell from 425 to 422. but their math scores rose 480 470 460 450 440 428 430 420 410 400 1972 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87.88 0 Math ■ Verbal Chart 14 Score Averages school year) 1988 National Average: 18.8: ` ** 22 21.4 ` ; - 19 18.5 18 16 17.2 ? 15 14 1972 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 ■ Natural Sciences 10 Mathematics 0 Social Studies ■ English 1 Source: American College Testing Program s L Chart 15 IM S.A!T. and A.C.T. Averages (by sex) 5.A.1 composite average score, 1987 -88 M 1933 877 500 600 700 800 900 1000 A.C.T. composite average score, 1987 -88 M 1 19.6 18.1 14 1: 16 17 18 19 20 Sources: Colleoe Board and American College Testing Program 4 Y E 0 u C A T I 0 N v I T A L 5 I G v 9 from 453 to 455. Women in all ethnic groups showed gains in math averages: Mexican Americans. with an eight -point gain, and black women, who gained seven points. did the best The average verbal score for men held steady at 435, but math scores for men slipped from 500 to 498. Although still large. the gender gap in mathematics scores has slimmed by nine points since 1977 and is now at its lowest in 14 years. the College Board notes. Scores on the American College Testing program (A.C.T) increased slightly over last year. with the change attributed to the continuing improvement in minority test scores. The average composite score was 18.8, up by. I from the 1987 national average. Scores in mathema- tics 117.2) and natural sciences (21.4) were the same as in 1987; the English score rose by. I to 18.5. and the social studies score fell by. I to 17.4 (see Chart 14). The A.C.T test scores and high school averages of both men and women showed only small variations or remained unchanged. Men continued to do better in all test areas except English. although women eamed higher glades in high school -2.94 for women compared with 2.83 for men. National assessments In its comprehensive report Crossroads in American Education. the N.A.EP. summarized national trends from nearly 20 years of testing in four basic subjects—reading, writing, mathe- matics, and science Isee Chart 16). Most students are acquiring basic knowledge. the report says. but few are leaming to use that knowledge effectively in thinking and reasoning. Specific findings: e Reading. Students at all three ages tested 19. 13. and 17) were reading significantly better in 1984 than in 1971, but 61 percent of 17 -year- olds still cannot understand. summarize, and explain relatively complicated information, including material about topics they study at school. Chart 16 0 National Trends in Average Proficiency: Ages 9, 13, and 17 Source: National Assessment of Educational Progress ■ Age 17 III Age 13 0 Age 9 300 250 200 300 250 200 300 250 200 298.2 284.5 284.5 _ L 257.4 257.8 213.5 213.2 1971 1975 1980 1984 Reading: 1971 to 1984 3oaa.�� tm 'ZSIQ Co 44r�Ix -� t` 30Q4 �„ t 29g 5 3020 _ t?r.. v a Wit; r - xe = „ x�wr}n�.y AW .� tYc K 7 t� r `�;` , �s�s t r 1973 1978 1982 1986 Mathematics: 1973 to 1986 304.8 � -"� ♦ .i• _ . i- Y `�� .29s.s '�'.. +`7r a, o . ,t3c.r • K �, �, x ,7s 288.5 r n,x.. o r 283 3 v �249s 2501 251.4` . 247.4 L 22AS 2203 " - =r 219.9 220.9 2243 1970 1973 1977 1982 1986 Science: 1969 -70 to 1986 E D U C A T 1 O N v I i A L S I G N S 1 9 8 9 1 1 9 9 0 • Mathematics. The math proficiency of 9 and 13- year -olds was higher in 1986 than in the first N.A.E.R tests in 1973. The skills of 17 -year- olds declined steadily from 1973 to 1982. then began an uphill swing. But nearly half of the 17- year -olds do not have the skills required to perform tasks with decimals. fractions. and percents or to do basic geometry and algebra. (For more on mathematics achievement. see "Innumeracy :" page A9.) • Science. The science skills of 9- year -olds improved between 1982 and 1986 —after declining in the early 1970s and changing little between 1973 and 1982. The pattern was similar for 13 -year -olds. although their average skills declined more and recovered less. Despite recent gains. the average proficiency of 17 -year- olds remains well below that of 1970: for example. in 1986. only 7 percent could draw conclusions using detailed scientific knowledge. • Writing. Writing proficiency at all age levels was no better in 1984 than it was ten years earlier. With less than a third of the 17- year -olds performing adequately on persuasive and informative tasks. N.A.F-? says. a "vast number' of students nearing graduation cannot move beyond straightforward statements to "communicate a reasoned point of view." "If one views this report as a balance sheet 'n0 dJ 4:0 .rte on 20 years of American education, our assets clearly include strengthening students' basic skills and improving minority student perfor- mance:' says N.A. E.P. Executive Director Archie Lapointe. "On the liabilities side of the ledger. we find deficits in higher-order thinking skills. which mean that large proportions of American students do not appear to be adequately prepared for college work, career mobility. or thoughtful citizenship:' Economics Another deficit was revealed last winter when U.S. high school students failed a test of basic economics administered by the joint Council on Economic Education. Overall. students correctly answered only 40 percent of the questions on a standardized multiple-choice test of economics. They correctly answered only 34 percent of the questions on the national economy and 36 percent of those on the intemational economy. The test, given to 8.205 high school juniors and seniors. found students generally had a hard time with basic economic concepts. Only 39 percent of the students could define the Gross National Product: 34 percent could define profits: and 25 percent showed a clear under- standing of inflation. The report recommends beginning instruction in economics earlier, in elementary and junior high school. Other recommendations include providing better teacher training in economics and requiring all high school students to take an economics course. Currently accord- ing to the council. 28 states require some economics instruction, but only 15 make it a prerequisite for high school graduation. 4j�o !gam' 6j r s -s A19, E D U C A T 1 O N V I T A L 5 I G N 5 1 9 8 9 1 1 9 9 0 Drug use The numbers of high school seniors using cocaine, marijuana, and other drugs continued to drop in 1988 and are at the lowest levels in more than a decade. according to an annual national survey of high school seniors. Of special importance was the downturn in cocaine use: The study said 7.9 percent of the class of 1988 reported using cocaine in the previous 12 months, down from 10.3 percent in 1987 and 11.4 percent in 1983 Isee Chart 171. The confidential study, conducted by the University of Michigan's Institute for Social Research and funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, also found a downturn in the use of crack, the smokable form of cocaine. Of the 16,300 students surveyed. 3.1 percent said they used crack in 1988. down from 4.0 percent in 1987. The decline was reported in every socioeconomic group and among students with poor attendance and academic records. The results indicate a "beginning of a retreat from the use of crack:' said Lloyd Johnston, a social psychologist and director of the study. Marijuana use continued its long -term. gradual decline. In 1979, the peak year. half of all seniors reported some use of marijuana in the yeas prior to the survey. but the 1988. only one - third of seniors said the same. Chart 18 M Percentages of Dropouts Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census Dropouts Although the nationwide dropout rate has declined gradually from 1981 to 1986. that decline doesn't hold true for one key group: The dropout rate among 14 and 15-year-olds went up from 2.0 to 2.4 percent (see Chart 18). Other groups of students are doing better at staying in school. especially 18 and 19- year -old Hispanics. whose dropout rate decreased from 36.4 percent in 1981 to 26.8 percent in 1986. Still. dropout rates for Hispanics remain considerably higher than the rates for white or black students. The extent of the U.S. dropout problem remains a source of contention: Various federal agencies, as well as states and local school systems. base their data on widely varying definitions. This fall. a pilot program to testa standard definition of a dropout is beginning in 27 states and the District of Columbia. The definition takes into account the fact that a significant number of students might be dropping out before grade nine: traditionally, these students have not been counted as dropouts because many formulas measure only the high school rate. Grading the schools Americans gave fewer As and Bs and more Cs. Ds. and failing grades to their public schools nationally last year than they did in 1987, accord- ing to the 1988 Gallup Poll of the Public's Attitudes Toward the Public Schools Isee Chart 191. Forty -eight percent of respondents gave the public schools a grade of C. compared with 44 percent in 1987: only 23 percent thought the schools were perceived as good enough to merit an A or B. compared with 26 percent in 1987. The ratings people give their local public schools are always a bit better than the national ratings. Since an all -time low in 1983. when C. D. and F ratings overwhelmed A and B ratings by 52 percent to 31 percent. Americans are show- ing more approval of their local schools. A and B ratings have leveled off at 40 percent or above. while C. D. and F ratings hover 2 around 45 percent. notes the Gallup Poll. s �J,yjs s P_, J •s J •� 6j J6 •O J6 Chart 19 7 Gradina the Schools (by percent) 22 44 11 Note: C not tot becaus answer Source: Gallup Poll E D U C A T 1 O N V I T A L 5 1 G N S 1 9 8 9 ! 1 9 9 0 1 hat's the state of your state this year? Have you lost or gained students? How much more are you spending on each pupil today than you did five years ago? How much have teacher salaries increased? What contribution is the federal gov: rnment making toward school expenses? Have greater expenditures brought about better results — higher test scores and an improved graduation rate? You can learn the answers to these and other important questions by reviewing the state -by -state statistics on the following pages. To compare your state with the U.S. average, see the last column of Chart 25. Here are a few highlights: • Enrollments. The increases in total public school enrollment that began in 1985 continued this year: Enrollment went up to nearly 40.3 million in 1988 -89. an increase since last year of approximately 168.500 students nationwide. The increases. however, were at the elementary level. with an estimated 526.500 more students in the lower grades. Secondary school enroll- ment declined by some 358.000 students. Projections from the U.S. Department of Education indicate that enrollment in grades K -8 will increase for the rest of the decade and into the 1990s. Enrollment declines in grades 9 -12 will come to a halt next year, and after 1990 will change course as greater numbers of younger students move up to the higher grades. The increases should continue until 1997, although they probably will not reach the peak enroll- ments attained in 1971. Education Department officials say " Enrollment increases are by no means uniform across the U.S. For example, a few states in the Northeast region saw continued declines in enrollment, while many states in the Southwest continued to pick up large numbers of students. as they have been doing in recent years. • Teacher salaries. The average teacher salary went from $28,008 in 1987 -88 to $29.567 in 1988 -89. an increase of 5.6 percent. Average salaries, which vary widely across the U.S.. ranged from a high of $41,693 in Alaska to a low of 520,480 in South Dakota. For begin- ning teachers. the average salary nationwide in 1988 -89 was $19.598. up 5.8 percent over the previous year, according to the American Federation of Teachers. Debate continues over how much teacher salaries actually have risen during the last decade. The National Education Association says that when inflation is taken into account. the average teacher salary grew by only S 1,844. or 12.3 percent, between 1978 -79 and 1988- 89. The U.S. Department of Education says that since 1980 -81, average teacher salaries, adjusted for inflation, have risen almost 18 percent but notes that it wasn't until 1987 that teachers regained the buying power they had in the early 1970s. �� ^E D u C n T 1 0 N v i T a L 5 i G N 5 1 9 a 9 I 1 9 9 0 • Per -pupil expenditures. Average spending per pupil reached 54.509 in 1988 -89. an increase of 7.1 percent over the previous year Variations among the states are wide: Expenditures range from a high of $7.571 in New Jersey to a low of $2.574 in Utah. • Pupil- teacher ratios. Pupil- teacher ratios declined 27 percent between 1971 and 1988. from 22.3 to 17.6 students per teacher. The current range is from a low of 13.3 pupils per teacher in Connecticut to a high of 24.7 in Utah. Other states with low pupil- teacher ratios include: Vermont. Massachusetts. and New Jersey: the pupil - teacher ratio also was low in the District of Columbia. Those with a high pupil - teacher ratio include: California. Hawaii. Idaho. Nevada. and Washington. • Graduation rate. The U.S. graduation rate slipped from 71.5 percent in 1986 to 71.1 in 1987, although it has improved slightly (by 1.6 percent) since 1982. States with the highest graduation rates in 1987 were: Minnesota. Wyoming. North Dakota. Nebraska. and Iowa. Those with the lowest rates were: District of Columbia. Florida. Louisiana. Michigan. and Georgia. The U.S. Department of Education. which supplied the data, noted that test scores and graduation rates are "strongly and posi- tively" associated with each other: States with high A.C.T. and S.A.T. scores also tend to have high graduation rates. ❑ ... • Funding. State governments continue to provide the largest share of public school support—a nationwide average of 50.2 percent for 1988 -89. The federal government's share remains small: 6.3 percent. Local govemments provide 43.5 percent of the funding for public schools. These figures represent a continuation of trends in public school funding noticeable since 1979. when the state share of school revenues rose above the local share for the first time. The National Education Association says congressional actions to reduce the national deficit likely will exert a "continuing downward pressure' on the federal government's share. thereby increasing pressure on state and local governments to meet the needs of public educa- tion. States governments are "holding the line financially" now, says a report from the National Governors Association, but sudden shifts in the economy or reductions in federal spending could place many states in financial jeopardy. The report says that in fiscal year 1989, state revenues are expected to grow by 5.4 percent, but expenditures likely will jump by 6.8 percent. Eighteen states have had to reduce expenditures or take other steps to deal with shortfalls in the budget. ■ d tc ❑ ... • Funding. State governments continue to provide the largest share of public school support—a nationwide average of 50.2 percent for 1988 -89. The federal government's share remains small: 6.3 percent. Local govemments provide 43.5 percent of the funding for public schools. These figures represent a continuation of trends in public school funding noticeable since 1979. when the state share of school revenues rose above the local share for the first time. The National Education Association says congressional actions to reduce the national deficit likely will exert a "continuing downward pressure' on the federal government's share. thereby increasing pressure on state and local governments to meet the needs of public educa- tion. States governments are "holding the line financially" now, says a report from the National Governors Association, but sudden shifts in the economy or reductions in federal spending could place many states in financial jeopardy. The report says that in fiscal year 1989, state revenues are expected to grow by 5.4 percent, but expenditures likely will jump by 6.8 percent. Eighteen states have had to reduce expenditures or take other steps to deal with shortfalls in the budget. ■ •, . ........ Ind. Iowa Ky. Ohio Wis. 7.2 6.3 S 3,397 S 2,730 S 3,239 $ 2,550 S 4,513 S 3,858 $ 4,289 $ 3,655 S 3,553 S 4,576 S 4,577 S 3,838 $23,345 $21,587 $20,140 $19,780 $31;195 528,664 $25,884 $24,920 $28,877 $24,480 $19,300 $18,785 $21,421 $23,000 $34,419 $31,500 $25,981 $24,203 $29,152 E D U C A T I O N v i T A L 5 I G N S 1 9 8 9 1 1 9 9 0 Finances Per pupil expenditures 1983 -84 1988 -89 Average teacher salaries 1983 -84 1988 -89 Funding percentages 1983 -84 Federal State Local 1988 -89 Federal State Local Per -capita income I Chart 22 IZ North Central III. Ind. Iowa Ky. Ohio Wis. 7.2 6.3 S 3,397 S 2,730 S 3,239 $ 2,550 S 4,513 S 3,858 $ 4,289 $ 3,655 S 3,553 S 4,576 S 4,577 S 3,838 $23,345 $21,587 $20,140 $19,780 $31;195 528,664 $25,884 $24,920 Mich. Minn. Mo. Neb. Ohio Wis. 7.2 6.3 5.2 4.4 37.7 S 3,498 $ 3,376 $ 2,714 S 2,927 S 3,090 S 3,553 S 4,576 S 4,577 S 3,838 S 3,732 $ 4,138 $ 5,117 18.6 60.6 41.5 52.9 65.2 $28,877 $24,480 $19,300 $18,785 $21,421 $23,000 $34,419 $31,500 $25,981 $24,203 $29,152 531,046 7.6 5.7 5.4 10.5 4.3 4.4 7.2 6.3 5.2 4.4 37.7 53.6 41.0 70.9 35.1 54.1 39.9 28.5 43.9 37.9 54.6 40.7 53.7 18.6 60.6 41.5 52.9 65.2 50.9 57.7 8.2 4.1 5.6 9.9 3.9 4.3 5.5 5.2 5.0 4.4 36.7 60.6 46.1 69.9 36.3 56.1 40.6 24.5 47.8 40.2 55.2 35.3 48.2 20.1 59.8 39.5 54.0 70.3 47.2 55.4 1988 $17,611 $14,721 $14,764 $12,795 $16,387 $16,787 $15,492 $15,184 $15,485 $15,444 0-room characteristics acher ratios s2 18.5 20.0 16.5 20.8 22.9 17.1 17.0 15.7 19.7 17.2 1988 17.2 17.9 15.6 18.2 20.1 17.1 16.2 15.1 18.0 16.2 • Graduation rate 1982 76.1 71.7 84.1 65.9 71.6 88.2 74.2 81.9 77.5 83.1 1987' 75.7 73.7 86.4 67.4 62.4 90.6 74.4 86.7 82.8 85.4 Enrollment Fall, 1983 -84 Elementary 1,271,447 515,914 262,581 431,243 852,223 348,193 546,155 149,519 1,130,800 446,807 Secondary 572,261 468,176 232,385 216,171 847,379 329,698 249,298 117,479 697,300 327,839 Total 1,843,708 984,090 494,966 647,414 1,699,602 677,891 795,453 266,998 1,828,100 774,646 Fall, 1988 -89 Elementary 1,254,119 525,601 266,126 433,482 1,100,900 410,982 568,048 162,040 1,121,769 497,055 Secondary 533,769 432,929 212,074 204,145 554,500 317,033 238,591 106,830 656,893 277,802 Total 1,787,888 958,530 478,200 637,627 1,655,400 728,015 806,639 268,870 1,778,662 774,857 Minority characteristics %Am.Ind. 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 Asian 2 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 1 2 Hispanic 9 2 1 0 2 1 1 2 1 2 Black 19 9 3 10 20 2 15 4 15 9 Total % minority 30 12 5 10 24 6 17 8 17 14 %Handicapped 13.8 11.2 11.7 11.9 10.0 115 12.4 11.4 11.1 10.1 Mean S.A.T. Scores 1978 Verbal 463 413 516 473 459 497 465 484 459 479 Math 511 457 569 510 511 550 506 538 504 540 1988 Verbal 464 412 513 475 457 470 471 487 452 473 Math 520 458 577 515 513 531 519 545 499 534 of Graduates Taking S.A.T. -1988 18 55 5 10 13 17 14 10• '23 14 ,,pupil expenditures, average teacher salaries, funding percentages, and enrollments: National Education Association, Estimates of School Statistics, 1 and 1988 -89 -capita income: U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of Economic Analysis eupil- teacher ratios, graduation rates, and percentage handicapped: U.S. Department of Education, State Education Performance Chart, 1989 Minority characteristics: U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights, 1986 Elementaryand Secondary Schools Civil Rights Survey (based on data projected from reported data of 37, 298 schools with 23, 386,577 enrollment) S.A.T. scores and percentage of graduates taking test: College Entrance Examination Board VII. (B) MINUTES TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE NOVEMBER 14, 1989 9:00 A.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Fran Hoffman, Chairman Alison Fuhr Gordon Hughes Bob Sherman Craig Swanson MEMBERS ABSENT: None OTHERS PRESENT: Mr. Gary J. Hanus, 5336 Brookview Avenue Ms. Jean Colwell, 5401 Oaklawn Avenue South Ms. Shari LaFrance, 5357 Oaklawn Avenue South Ms. Sandra Wetzel, 5400 Oaklawn Avenue South Ms. Rynda Carlis, 5208 Meadow Ridge Ms. Donna Hjerpe, 5400 Park Place Ms. Cindy Robb, 5337 Oaklawn Avenue South Mr. John Zwicke, 5020 Blake Road Ms. Carol Flint - Kaliebe, 5429 Brookview Avenue Mr. Jim Hovland, 5201 Blake Road Ms. Lynn Timmer, 5348 Oaklawn Avenue Ms. Andy Otness, 5433 Kellogg Avenue South Captain Leonard Kleven, Edina Police Department Officer Kris Eidem, Edina Police Department Ms. Joan Waterstreet, Edina Police Department SECTION A Requests on which the Committee recommends approval as requested or modified, and the Council's authorization of recommended action. (1) Discuss traffic safety concerns on West 54th Street, France Avenue to Wooddale Avenue. Continued from October meeting. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Hoffman reviewed the motion from last month's meeting. This included pedestrian signing of West 54th Street, engineering analysis of Minnehaha Boulevard, Brookview and Oaklawn intersections and continued enforcement efforts. Mr. Hoffman presented the engineering study which revealed no inherent grade problems for eastbound traffic, while westbound on West 54th Street, the grades are as follows: 5% downhill grade at Minnehaha Boulevard, 7% uphill grade at Brookview, and 3% uphill grade at Oaklawn. Mr. Hoffman's recommendation for best location of the three for signing was at Minnehaha Boulevard. However, he cautioned that to his knowledge there was only one TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES November 14, 1989 Page 2 other "STOP" sign placement at a downhill grade of that percentage and his recollection was that was a split vote by the Committee. . Mr. Hughes asked if there is any standard regarding "STOP" sign placement at certain grades of roadway and was told by Mr. Hoffman that it is normally a judgement call. Captain Kleven stated that heavy enforcement had been conducted during morning rush hour between 7:00 and 8:30 AM. A resident appealed for more enforcement efforts to be conducted on the weekends. Mr. Swanson stated that, for discussion purposes, his recommendation would be to not install "STOP" signs citing the following: (1) accident warrants do not exist, (2) volumes do not exist, (3) special circumstances do not appear to exist and the clearview is excellent, and (4) the added diffi- culty of installation of a sign on the downgrade may lead to a false sense of security to vehicles and pedestrians. Mr. Sherman also stated his concern for a "STOP" sign on the downgrade during the winter months. A resident disagreed with Mr. Swanson's assessment of the no special circum- stances warrant. She stated that the driver's may be able to see adequately on West 54th Street, but the pedestrians can not. Also the residents again showed concern regarding the change in demographics and also concern for reduction of residential speed limits. Mrs. Fuhr asked what criteria was needed for placement of 25 MPH advisory signs and was told by Mr. Hoffman that they normally are installed at curve locations. Also, they are not enforceable. Mr. Swanson asked if we delayed the Scotia Drive downhill grade "STOP" sign until the spring due to weather precautions and was told that we had, in fact, postponed the installation rather than place a new "STOP" sign on a downhill grade during the winter. Captain Kleven also offered that he had spoken with members of the School District and was told that they will try to move all school bus stops off West 54th Street. Officer Eidem stated that in the year's time she had worked this location on and off, her recollection was that she only issued one citation and possibly two warnings that were speed related. Mr. Hughes moved to deny "STOP" sign request, to install 25 MPH advisory signs for both directions of West 54th Street at Halifax and Oaklawn, to continue enforcement efforts, and to review the area in May of 1990. Mrs. Fuhr seconded the motion. Motion carried 5 -0. (2) Request for installation of "STOP" signs on Blake Road at Fox Meadow Lane and Blake Road at Knoll Drive. Request received from James Hovland, 5201 Blake Road. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. James Hovland began by stating that the intent of the item was more to review concerns than to make specific recommendations to the Committee. He states that, with the recent improvement and reopening of Blake Road, TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES November 14, 1989 Page 3. the speeds have increased and safety was becoming a concern. He felt that the bottom line was enforcement efforts and letting the public know that high speeds would not be tolerated. Mr. Zwicke, another Blake Road resident, agreed with Mr. Hovland and also said that a speed limit was only as good as enforcement efforts made it. He feels that Blake Road has similar traffic patterns to Interlachen Boulevard and that, the more the road is improved, the more people will tend to speed. Mr. Zwicke also commented that a large impact was-made on speed reduction on Interlachen Boulevard by heavy enforcement activity and he felt Blake Road would benefit by the same type of efforts.. He also asked about 20 MPH advisory signs on the curves reasoning that even those that don't comply may still slow speeds somewhat. Mr. Swanson asked Mr. Hoffman if, after the recent reconstruction period, all follow -up signing, etc. was now in place. Mr. Hoffman replied that only the "NO PARKING" signs were in place to his knowledge, and not any type of speed limit or advisory signing. Captain Kleven also addressed the idea of heavier enforcement efforts by stating that there are only certain areas the Department could use for radar setups. He cannot park a police vehicle on a narrow road without shoulders as this could potentially be hazardous to drivers using Blake Road. He then reviewed the accident statistics which showed most accidents occuring at the intersections of Blake Road and Vernon Avenue or Blake and Interlachen Boulevard. Remaining accidents proved to be at various inter- sections along the length of Blake Road between Vernon and Interlachen. Also, two speed surveys were conducted on Blake Road during morning rush hours. Of 66 vehicles observed during a one hour period, three were over 40 MPH. The second survey showed 102 vehicles during a one hour period with three vehicles traveling at over 40 MPH. Mrs. Fuhr was of the opinion that the Committee should continue the item for further study. Mr. Hughes felt that at this time there were insuffi- cient warrants for "STOP" signs and he would rather try other options which more directly addressed the speed issue. Mr. Hughes moved to have the Engineering Department review Blake Road for placement of appropriate speed limit and advisory signing and also that the Traffic Enforcement Unit be requested to conduct further enforcement efforts on Blake Road. Mr. Swanson Seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -1. (3) Request for a "STOP" sign at the intersection of Indian Way West (new street) and McCauley Trail. Request received from Edina Engineering Department. ACTION TAKEN: Mrs. Fuhr moved to install a "STOP" sign at the intersection of Indian Way West and McCauley Trail, as the warrants for definition of right -of- way are met. Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Motion carried 5 -0. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING November 14, 1989 Page 4 (4) Request for a "STOP" sign at southbound Edinborough Way and West 76th Street. Edinborough Way from Parklawn to West 76th Street is a new street constructed as part of Centennial Lakes. Request received from Edina.Engineering Department. ACTION TAKEN: Mrs. Fuhr moved to install a "STOP" sign at southbound Edinborough Way and West.76th Street, as warrants for definition of right -of -way are met. Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Motion carried 5 -0. (5) Request to install "NO PARKING ANYTIME" signs on West 70th Street between Antrim Road and T.H. 100 at appropriate locations. Request is made as a result of recent restriping of West 70th Street between Metro Boulevard and Antrim Road. Request received from Edina Engineering Department. ACTION TAKEN: Mrs. Fuhr moved to install a "NO PARKING ANYTIME" siens on West 70th Street between Antrim Road and T.H. 100 at appropriate locations. Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Motion carried 5 -0. (6) Request for pedestrian crosswalk at 7630 Bush Lake Road. Continued from July meeting. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Hoffman and Captain Kleven met with James Berdall of Business Incen- tives, Inc., the original requestor, on November 7, 1989 to survey the situation and make recommendations. The request was based on the number of times per day that Business Incentives employees must cross Bush Lake Road to access offices owned by the company that are located on both sides of the road. Mr. Hoffman and Captain Kleven's recommendation was not to install a pedestrian crosswalk as there isn't a defined intersection, but rather to install pedestrian signing warning drivers that there is heavy pedestrian traffic in this area. Mr. Swanson moved to denythe marked crosswalk at 7630 Bush Lake Road and to install pedestrian signing to alert drivers. Mrs. Fuhr seconded the motion. Motion carried 5 -0. (7) Discussion items carried over from October meeting. (a) Support the City of Minneapolis on the 25 MPH basic speed law in urban districts. (b) Recommend a policy be formulated for sign requests. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES November 14, 1989 Page 5 ACTION TAKEN: (a) Mr. Hoffman reviewed the position taken by the City of Minneapolis regarding reduction of speed limits to 25 MPH in urban areas. In essence, the opinion is geared at changing the limit state -wide as opposed to allowing a city by city change. Mrs. Fuhr asked what is classified as a "residential" street and was told that this would be any street below a "collector" classification. Mr. Hughes asked about what the enforcement implications might be. Captain Kleven's opinion was that should a change occur, heavy signing and education of the driving public would have to result. Mr. Swanson also stated that from a compliance standpoint, the results would be much lower. While now we normally see 80 -90 %'compliance with posted limits, reduction of residential limits would probably result in 50 -60% compliance. Mr. Hughes stated that he was reluctant to endorse this reduction without further studies from states who have reduced their limits. Mr. Hoffman pointed out that, in fact, previously proposed legisla- tion regarding the reduction of the limit to 25 MPH has not gone anywhere and this request would merely be to bring it onto the table for further legislative discussion. Mrs. Fuhr moved to go on record as supporting further legislative hearings in consideration of reducing the speed limit in urban areas to 25 MPH. Mr. Sherman seconded the motion. Motion carried 5 -0. (b) Mr. Swanson began by stating his concerns as to certain aspects of effectiveness and efficiency of the Traffic Safety Committee. Too often, items have been continued over several months without resolve. These delays are caused by continuing study of an item or adding additional reports before a decision is made. It was his suggestion, therefore, to establish guidelines and criteria that should be met before an issue is placed on the active agenda of the Traffic Safety Committee. This would allow for adequate research before discussion, clarification of issues to be dealt with, justification for change, and guidelines to be addressed. He suggested possibly developing a brochure or fold -out stating these guidelines that might be presented to the requestor at the time request is made so that further follow - up could be conducted prior to meeting date. Establishing a cut -off date for proposed agenda items was also discussed. Mrs. Fuhr moved to establish a draft of the scenario to be used by the Traffic Safety Committee on all future requests in an effort to better serve the public. Mr. Sherman seconded the motion. Motion carried 5 -0. (c) Mr. Hoffman moved to restrict accident history to the past-three years on all Traffic Safety issues. Mr. Sherman seconded the motion. Motion carried 5 -0. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES November 14, 1989 Page 6 SECTION B Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request. (1) Request for installation of "STOP" signs on Meadow Ridge at Everett Place. Continued from October meeting. ACTION TAKEN: Captain Kleven began by reviewing the four speed surveys which had been conducted since last month's meeting. All were conducted at one hour intervals during late afternoon and early evening rush hour periods. The number of vehicles ranged from ten per hour to 17 per hour and all were within compliance. Also, Captain Kleven had the southeast corner of the intersection checked for possible clearview violations and was told that this was also in compliance. Mrs. Carlis asked about the specifics of the clearview ordinance and was advised by Captain Kleven. His suggestion was that-Mrs. Carlis possibly communicate with the owner of the corner property in question to see if he might further trim the tree for safety reasons. Mr.- Swanson moved denial of the "STOP" sign request based on lack of warrants. Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Motion carried 5 -0. (2) Request to upgrade the intersection of West 56th Street and Brookview Avenue from a 2 -way to a 4 -way "STOP" sign. Continued from October meeting. ACTION TAKEN: Captain Kleven began by stating that there had been 2 -1/2 hours of enforce- ment efforts at the intersection on three different days by Officer Eidem of the Traffic Enforcement Unit. The results were that all vehicles were complying at the "STOP" signs and only one citation was written, which was speed related. Mr. Hoffman asked if, perhaps, vehicles were actually "rolling" through the intersection and Officer Eidem stated that the traffic compliance was good at this intersection and, actually, better than most in Edina. Mr. Sherman moved denial of the upgrade from a 2 -way to a 4 -way "STOP" at the intersection of West 56th Street and Brookview Avenue. Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0, with one abstension. SECTION C Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others. (1) Discuss traffic safety concerns on Gleason Road at West 78th Street. Continued from October meeting. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES November 14, 1989 Page 7 ACTION TAKEN: Captain Kleven reported that four speed surveys had been conducted in this area since the last meeting during morning and evening rush hour periods. The highest speed recorded was 39 MPH and eight total citations were written. Captain Kleven stated that a speed problem had been recognized and enforce- ment efforts would continue. Mr. Hoffman stated that the speed surveys should be reviewed by the Engi- neering Department to try to determine speeds for the majority of drivers and, therefore, establish the 85 percentile ratio of the driving public, and relate the information to the geometrics of the street with it's many curves. Mr. Hoffman moved to continue the item until December. Mr. Sherman seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -1. EDINA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE I o e ,p ' VJ REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor Richards and Agenda Item # Council Members From: Consent ❑ Bob Kojetin, Director Park and Recreation Dept. Information Only ❑ Date: November 16, 1989 Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: ❑ To Council Braemar Golf League Policies Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Info /Background: See Attached. See Attached. RECOMMENDATION: A. MOTION: RESCIND ALL FIVE OF THE FOLLOWING POLICIES OF THE NOVEMBER 2,1987•COUNCIL MEETING: LResidence - All golf league members must be residents of Edina. Present league members who are non residents, may continue as such through 1989. 2. Number of Leagues - Beginning with 1990, all league members are limited to play in only one league or division. 3.Numbers of Limitation - All league membership shall be capped at their present limitations. Any 9 -hole women's morning league, presently capped at more than 48 members, shall through attrition, reduce their membership total to 48. This will facilitate the orderly play of the 18 -hole golfers through the back nine. 4.Time Assign - It may become necessary to adjust day of play and /or starting times to make a more effective course operation. 5.Reductions - Beginning 1990, the following leagues will be eliminated: National Car Rental, Hennepin County League, and Singles League. B. MOTION: GRANDFATHER IN ALL NON RESIDENTS THAT ARE CURRENTLY IN LEAGUE PLAYWITH NO LIMITATION AS FAR AS NUMBER OF YEARS UNTIL SUCH TIME THEY ELIMINATE THEMSELVES THROUGH ATTRITION. C. MOTION: BEGIN THE 1990 SEASON BY HAVING ALL LEAGUE MEMBERS LIMITED TO PLAYING ONLY IN ONE LEAGUE OR DIVISION WITH THE EXCEPTION THAT A LEAGUE MEMBER MAY PLAY IN ONE LEAGUE AND ALSO IN ONE COUPLES LEAGUE. D. MOTION: APPROVE THE FOLLOWING THREE POLICIES: LNumbers of Limitation - All league membership shall be capped at their present limitations. Any 9 -hole women's morning league, presently capped at more than 48 members, shall through attrition, reduce their membership total to 48. This will facilitate the orderly play of the 18 -hole golfers through the back nine. 2. rime Assignments - It may become necessary to adjust day of play and /or starting times to make a more effective course operation. 3.Reductions - Beginning 1990, the following leagues will be eliminated: National Car Rental, Hennepin County League, Singles League. BACKGROUND: Enclosed is the policy approved at the November 2, 1987 Council Meeting including all of attachment A which is the golf league policies at Braemar. B MOTION Recommendations by the Park Board to grandfather all non residents into the program until attrition would be eliminated. C AND D MOTION It is the staffs recommendation that we proceed with the policy decisions voted in 1987. Reasoning for this is that all leagues had been working toward their making the adjustments for the 1990 season. It would be very confusing for some who have already been eliminated through some of the programs that we started in the last 2 years and not fair to those residents. ALTERNATIVE C MOTION IF SO DESIRED BEGIN THE 1990 SEASON BY HAVING ALL LEAGUE MEMBERS CONTINUE WITH PRESENT LEAGUE POLICIES THROUGH THE 1992 SEASON AT WHICH TIME WE WILL REVISIT THE ONE LEAGUE RULE STARTING WITH THE 1993 SEASON. Attachment A CITY OF EDINA PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PROPOSED BRAEMAR GOLF LEAGUE POLICIES These policies are proposed in order to facilitate the growing demands of residents wanting to participate in league play and still give adequate numbers of open golf time. It is the recommendation that these proposed new policies be started with the 1.990 season which gives adequate time for affected leagues and golfers time to make adjustments in their membership and rules. LEAGUE MEMBERSHIP I. Residence All golf league members must be residents of Edina. Present league members' who are non residents, may continue as such through 1989. 2. Number of Leagues Beginning with 1990, all league members are limited to play in only one league or division. 3. Numbers Limitation All league membership shall be capped at their present limitations. Any 9 -hole women's morning league, presently capped at more than 48 members, shall through attrition, reduce their membership total to 48. This will facilitate the orderly play of the 18 -hole golfers through the back nine. 4. 5. Time Assignments It may.become necessary to adjust day of play and /or starting times to make a more effective course operation. Reductions Beginning 1990, the following leagues will be eliminated: National Car Rental _ Hennepin County League Singles League Council Minutes Motion and Acceptance, November 2, 1987. J/ A CITY OF EDINA PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT BRAF_ %1AR GOLF LEAGUE PLAY POLICIES s; Present Rules as of June 1986 The Edina Park Board and the Edina Park and Recreation Department in conjunction with golf course management will set such golf league policies which are appropriate and necessary, updating them as needed. Although a municipality is not constituted to give special favors to a particular group, the golf course may grant limited privileges which are consistent with the rights of the general public. General League Guidelines - Golf Leagues or Clubs should: 1. Interest themselves primarily in promoting good sportsmanship, tournament programs and social contact among its members. 2. Foster and create good public relations between their golf league and all other golfers at Braemar. .3. Be walking delegates to insure proper habits and the observance of rules and regulations concerning play and upkeep of the course. 4. Must not forget the responsibility of the management to the general public. 5. Never invade the function retained by the City management to properly administrate the course. Present Golf League Policies (1986) 1. New Members a. All new golf league members must be residents of Edina.. This does not include present industrial leagues on the Executive Course. b. All new league members may be members of only one league on the regulation course. Exception: Couples League. 2. Fees League members who are not patrons, shall pay a reserve tee time fee each season. This is an addition to the non - patron green fee. This fee averages approximately 25 cents per time for the year. 3. .Reserve Tee Times a. The Course Management will'set aside such tee times as are necessary for each league. This reserve time may fluctuate during the golfing season. b. Braemar reserves the right to make foursomes of all groups including and during league play. c. Reservation sign up sheets shall be provided by the course management. Changes in these reserved times must be approved by the course management so as to not create conflicts. d. From time to time it my become necessary to cancel or adjust league play for a special event, or for course maintenance. r. Policies (cont) When this occurs, the earliest possible notice will be given to the affected leagues. e. League event schedules which might affect the golfing public must be clearly resolved well in advance of the event and must be approved. f. During rain or inclimate weather, if.the league decides not to play, the course should be promptly notified. Conversely, if the course must close due to weather conditions, prompt notification will be given to the league officers. 4. Membership numbers The Golf Course Manager shall limit the size and number of golf leagues at Braemar Golf Course. 5. League responsibilities - golf leagues shall a. Collect and manage its own funds and programs. b. Elect officers and directors or appoint as noted in their by -laws so as to spread authority and responsibility among a large segment of the membership. C. Conduct their own events and golf tournaments, with the guidance from the professionals and management of the course. d. Refrain from becoming profit motivated or accumulating any assets of any nature, except in the normal operation of a golf league. The retention of monies from one golfing season to the next, be only that which is necessary for the mailings and start up of.the ensuing golf season. e. Provide the course with a roster of their membership, complete wirth name, address, phone and officers. f. Provide their own postage, envelops and stationary. k. Course management a. Will not have any part in the collection of dues or the naming of the officers of any golf league. b. Will recognize that each golf league represents only that portion of the total play at Braemar, which is represented by its roster. c. Must allow only such privileges as are consistant with the rights of the residents and the general public. d: Should insist on the right of sitting in on, or attending golf league board meetings, as an ex- officio member. e. Assist the officers and members in each league with the necessary guidance to help them perform their duties. f. Act as a facilitator in the dissemination of information concerning changes in the rules of golf, handicap information, sale of golf merchandise, rules of amateur status and tournament participation. g. Provide a maximum of three (3) separate paper copy "runoffs" for each league during each golfing season. A ' s .it BRAE`iAR GOLF LEAGUES 1987 REGULATION COURSE Braemar Men's Club Sully Rudd 926 -2051 Braemar Women's Club 18 holes Vada Ewald 941 -1233 Braemar Women's Club 9 holes Colleen Crew 925 -1629 Edina Newcomers Cindy Nelson 922 -5120 Highlanders Mavis Klefsaas 941 -6289 Braemar Monday League Kay Murphy 938 -4237 Bowling Green Martha Hilgenforf 929 -5421 Myrtle Lerum 866 -0601 Braemar Ladies Twilight Susan Snodgrass 944 -9050 . Tuesday Clubbers Mary Alice Sadler 922 -5112 Westwood Joyce Fess 474 -0045 Couples Warren /Rose Hoglin 922 -2522 Edina Women's Golf Assoc. Judy Cilla 935 -5362 Singles Dick Wegner 330 -6760 Iiennepin County Lawrence Pratt 935 -3381 National Car - Joe McLeod 830 -2825 Golden Agers Ken Malek 920 -0242 A ?,JBRqAEMAqRMEN'S CLUB • 6364 DEWEY HILL ROAD • EDINA, MN 55435 • 612 -941 -2072 The Honorable Fred Richards, Mayor November 13, 1989 City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Richards: The Braemar Men's Club Board met on November 9th, 1989. After a full discussion of the issues and presently proposed options regarding the Council's review of the 1987 Council action regarding league and non - resident play at the Braemar Golf Course the Board unanimously adopted a motion to recommend that the Council act to adopt the following resolution as the most acceptable and equitable solution to the issues raised by the various parties: "Resolved that, until such time as a new nine shall be completed and opened for play at the Braemar Golf Course: a. Non - resident members of two organized, gender- specific, leagues during the 1989 season shall be permitted to remain as members of those leagues. (no non - resident shall, under any circumstances, be permitted to retain membership in more than two organized leagues at the Braemar Golf Course in 1990); b. Edina residents who were members, during the 1989 season, of two organized, gender - specific, 'leagues shall be permitted to remain as members of those leagues. No Edina resident, under any circumstances, shall be permitted to retain membership in more than two organized gender- specific leagues at the Braemar Golf Course; c. As has been the case since 1984, every individual who becomes a new member-of an organized league must be an Edina resident and may become a member of only a single league. Single, gender- specific, 1989 league members may change their league membership affiliation in 1990 (subject to the rules of the league they are joining). Individuals who, in 1989, were members of two, gender- specific, leagues must reduce their membership to a single league before becoming a member of any other league; and, d. These residency restrictions shall not apply to membership in the existing Sister Kenny Handicap League nor shall the gender- specific membership limits apply to the existing Mixed League. . e. Further resolved that, at the time a specific date for the opening of a new nine hole course is established, the Council will solicit the views of concerned residents and others with respect to any changes in its current regulations regarding league membership at the Braemar Golf Course." This resolution is the same as the second option offered by our 1989 President, John Hoyt, in his letter to you of October 23rd, 1989. We can perceive of no action that you could now take that would address or solve the market demand for golfing opportunities by the members of the Edina or the larger suburban community. Your action in proceeding with all reasonable haste in the construction of an additional nine at Braemar will clearly help in the future and we believe this resolution is consistent with that action. Respectfully, 'r Charles J. Drees 1990 President, Braemar Men's Club cc: Council Members Ken Rosland John.Valliere Bob Kojetin Bob Christenson BMC Board BGA President �1 BRAEMAR MEN'S CLUB • 6364 DEWEY HILL ROAD • EDINA, MN 55435 612 -941 -2072 October'23, 1989 The Honorable Fred Richards, Mayor City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Richards: It is my understanding that the City Council will reconsider its 1987 decision relative to the issues of non - resident and single - league -only league membership at the Braemar Golf Course at its meeting scheduled for November 20th, 1989. I also understand that you, and the other members of the Council, have been provided with detailed factual data regarding current (1989 season) multiple league memberships and non- resident league memberships. I will only repeat here two facts: There are no non- resident members of either of the men's leagues (The Braemar Men's Club [BMC] and the Golden Ager's League [GAL]); and, there are 34 men who are members of both the BMC and the GAL as well as 15 men in the BMC who play in both the Tuesday 9 -hole and the Thursday 18 -hole BMC events. Both the BMC and the GAL have made the assumption that the 1987 Council decision will take effect at the start of the 1990 season-and have planned accordingly by advising their affected members of their need to make a choice of membership in only one league and playing in only one of the two BMC weekly events for 1990. We have assumed that the resultant freeing up of 49 scheduled league tee times would (along with the additional league tee times released by the ladies' leagues as a result of their 1990 implementation of the 1987 Council decision) make a contribution to the expressed need for additional "Open Play" tee times. In short, under the assumption that a decision by the Council would equitably affect both male and female leagues, the BMC and the GAL have actively moved to accommodate, beginning in 1990, to the 1987 Council's decision. On behalf of the Braemar Men's Club Board and its membership I want to assure you and the Council that the BMC would support any change in the 1987 decision that the Council considers both reasonable and necessary as it responds to constituent requests - provided that such a change is, in fact, equitable to all. For example, a decision to allow continued league membership by non- residents but to require resignations from a league by current Edina resident members of that league might be considered as emotionally acceptable but is clearly not equitable. We would, at that point, reconsider our support of the 1987 decision. It appears that there are two possible choices open to the Council (particularly given the fact that I have seen no evidence on the part of any of the interest groups involved to even discuss any compromise solution). They are (as perceived by me): 1. Implementation, as intended, of the 1987 decision; or, 2. Continuation of the 1988 -89 interim regulations until such time as the new nine is opened for play with a scheduled "revisit" of those regulations at that time. I have, as you may be aware, been heavily involved in discussions and debates about this issue both as 1989 president of the BMC and the Braemar Golf Association and as a staff member of the Braemar Golf Course as Supervisor of Starters and Rangers. Because of that involvement I am offering below, for your review and possible consideration, a draft of my versions of resolutions that would clearly set forth the intent of the two choices. 1. Resolved that, effective in 1990, no organized golf league at the Braemar Golf Course shall have non -Edina residents as members of that league and no industrial league(s) shall be permitted. Resolved further that, no individual shall be a member of more than one gender- specific league at the Braemar Golf Course, regardless of which course is used by the league. Resolved further that: a. The residency requirement shall be waived for the existing Sister Kenny Handicapped League, and b. Membership in the existing Mixed League, as a non - gender specific group, may be held by individuals who are also members of a gender- specific Braemar league. Or - 2. Resolved that, until such time as a new nine shall be completed and opened for play at the Braemar Golf Course: a. Non - resident members of two organized, gender- specific, leagues during the 1989 season shall be permitted to remain as members of those leagues. (no non - resident shall, under any circumstances, be permitted to retain membership in more than two organized leagues at the Braemar Golf Course in 1990); b. Edina residents who were members, during the 1989. season, of two organized, gender- specific, leagues shall be permitted to remain as members of those leagues (no Edina resident, under any circumstances, shall be permitted to retain membership in more than two organized gender- specific leagues at the Braemar Golf Course); c. As has been the case since 1984, every individual who becomes a new member of an organized league must be an Edina resident and, consistent with the 1987 decision, may become a member of only a single league. Single, gender- specific, 1989 league members may change their league membership affiliation in 1990 (subject to the rules of the league they are joining). Individuals who, in 1989, were members of two, gender- specific, leagues must reduce their membership to a single league before becoming a member of any other league; and, d. These residency restrictions shall not apply to membership in the existing Sister Kenny Handicap League nor shall the gender- specific membership limits apply to the existing Mixed League. (The following statement could well be included with either of the above alternative actions should you wish to commit to a specific time frame for reconsideration): Further resolved that, at the time a specific date for the opening of a new nine hole course is established, the Council will solicit the views of concerned residents and others with respect to any changes in its current regulations regarding league membership at the Braemar Golf Course. I am assuming that the present policy of leaving decisions with respect to the membership size of any league to the discretion of the Course Manager will not change and does not require formal action by the Council. I will be out of town at the meeting so will not be able to be respond to questions that you or available, at almost any mutually November 15th, for any discussion request. Respectfully, John S. Hoyt,.Jr. ..cc: Council Members Ken Rosland John Valliere Bob Kojetin Bob Christenson BMC Board BGA President time of your scheduled November present at that meeting to others may have. I am convenient time prior to with you or others that you may ?'Ng- /Ia;JO,eA& it' A ✓o Counjc L �fQo� WF4T Soy`` S7- D ✓�! ITT M /�l SS `� Z 1 we t r(nI (- w keGAllp-,) T119. N _ '71JC,- l M kO(\%S U /V0 i 2 a- To yc- L Pry G",Ge_ dA e VEe��-�, % �rL4 IZ, <�, 7 �'1 I L6 0- T 1 _ra/2Sl�-/9 ✓ IV Q 1 A- T� lit S l ✓ 11 o C a&/ � 1 G-- � l F ir, l� on/,x LEA r-; TH4 FIE � A l wu F,N 6 I i C v L4 C 1� oy u u L �H S LcL,- C6Lo2 -SE OV 6-p- PcrA5F- � Pt OA�F- �K r � � �c�sanl Pv 2 A Z- L IV T!� 0 T 0 /V e J42� (41 /3 E12 Zc-2 � `� ci T-6 �} c r-6r C F -t k't 6Th Ls R 2-z- - g-H� l ( c ✓gF .v ,, ) 0 November 12, 1989 The Honorable Fred Richards, Mayor City of-Edina 4801 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Richards: It is thought that the City Council may reconsider its 1987 decision regarding the issues of non - resident and single - league membership at Braemar Golf Course at its meeting scheduled for November 20, 1989. I belong to the Golden Agers League and am also the treasurer of the Braemar Men's Club and really do enjoy golfing at Braemar. If the 1987 plan is implemented as originally proposed, I believe most people would accept it with - "O.K., a decision has been made for the good' of the golf course." However, if a decision is made to allow non - resident golfers to remain in a league but making the one league only policy effective in 1990 for everyone else, the attitude and feeling of many golfers at Braemar would be one of great disappointment. It seems that a more logical decision would be to allow the current leagues to stay in effect until the new nine(9) at Braemar is available for league play at which time a one league, non - resident policy then becomes effective. Respectfully, c`k`R. em k 7150 Cahill Road #111 o e ,. IBBB REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # VII.D. From: Jane Paulus Fran Hoffman Consent ❑ I -494 Project Information Only 0 Management Team Date: 20 November, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: I -494 Project Update a To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Information only and discussion. Info /Background: The report is to provide an update on the activities involving I -494 from I -394 to Minnesota River. Current activities include installation and operation of ramp meters on I -494 in the Richfield, Edina, Bloomington area. Next year, additional ramp metering will occur in the western sections of I -494 in Eden Prairie and Minnetonka area. Additionally, Mn /DOT will be resurfacing all of I -494 from I -394 to Cedar Avenue in 1990, approximately 400,000 tons of pavement. The work will be done at night. The other major activity is;the EIS being done for reconstruction of I -494 as was discussed in the initial I -494 Corridor Study. The project schedule for the EIS is attached. REPORT /RECOMMENDATION I -494 Project Update Page-Two The scoping document has been completed and will be the subject of a public hearing in mid - January. The scoping document is prepared to present decisions reached re ag rding the scope of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for I -494. It identifies the alternatives and impact which will be covered in depth in the EIS. This is a 65 page document which is available if anyone on the Council wishes to review it and additionally, a 23 page condensed version called the scoping decision document is available for review. There has been some delay in the process due to the Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority's request that light rail transit be studied in the corridor. .It was finally agreed that the light rail alternative would be studied, only and only if, ridership projections could be produced that. suggests that it is a feasible alternative. The funding issue for the study of the light rail transit alternative was not resolved. Most of the I -494 Project Management Team members have indicated that any necessary funding should come from Hennepin County for this alternative. Additionally, the I -494 JPO (Cities) are working on a model ordinance . regarding travel demand management. The IMPROVE 494 group (private sector) is conducting a study on travel habits and patterns of employees in several demonstration areas (usually office complexes in the corridor). a Project Schedule Stud STUDY REPORT Y Report Approval $e. Project Milestones Figure 3 1989 1 1990 1 1991 1992 M J S N J M M J S N J M M J S N J M M WORK TASKS A J A 0 D F A J A 0 D F A J A 0 D F A J ' Sco in Document Distributed P g S C O P 1 N G Public Scoping Meeting Sco in Decision P g qe Notice of Intent to Prepare EIS . R T D AF EIS ...................:.:...:............... ..................:.::........: DBIS Dis Technical Reports qe Public hearing X. ? e HIS Distributed FINAL EIS * Adequacy Deter - mination * Record of Decision HIGHWAY DESIGN *Access Access Revision Request Revision ALTERNATIVES Approval CONCEPTS AND LAYOUTS MnDot Staff Concurrence Stud STUDY REPORT Y Report Approval $e. Project Milestones Figure 3 w�t�1f� o e �, V1 Nov �N 0 Joao To :- Ken Ros 1 and From: Janet Chandler REPORT/RECOMMENDATION Date: November 20, 1989 Subject: Proposed Hennepin County Resolution #89- 11- 961111: Composting and Funding for Recycling Recommendation: Agenda Item # V1 I. E. . Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA © To Council Action ❑ Motion Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Council Resolution in opposition to the proposed Hennepin County Resolution Info/Background- SUMMARY OF RESOLUTION (COMPLETE COPY ATTACHED) * By March 15, 1990, each city must set up its own compost site or arrange to send it's yard waste to another city compost site. * The penalty for non - compliance is loss of county funding for recycling programs. The proposed resolution is on the agenda for the November 30 meeting of the Hennepin County Public Service Committee. BACKGROUND INFORMATION After January 1, 1990, state law prohibits disposal of yard wastes in landfills or incinerators. In anticipation of this law, Hennepin County developed a compost program whereby the County provided sites for composting and the cities set up collection and delivery systems. The County, however, has had a great deal of difficulty in finding a permanent compost site. The situation worsened when the Hassan Town Board revoked the County's permit to operate a compost site, due to complaints from residents about odors. The odor was especially strong because the yard waste had been stored for several weeks in plastic bags before delivery to Hassan. This situation has also strengthened the opposition of other cities to the location of compost areas within their borders. ALTERNATIVES County Staff has proposed that a County compost program accept only bulk yard waste. Haulers would need to remove bags en route or at a delivery point. Their opinion is that this would solve most of the operational problems and minimize odor problems. An effort is underway to locate suburban transfer areas where residents could bring yard waste. Also, recently developed compost facilities outside Hennepin County are now available, including a University project being funded by the Metropolitan Council. EFFECT ON CITY Should the County proposal pass, the City will need to consider setting up a compost site of 5 to 10 acres within Edina, or find another city willing to take Edina's yard waste. Failure in either of these efforts would mean loss of funding for the Recycling Program. RESOLUTION NO. 89-11 -961 R1 The following resolution was introduced by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Sivanich: BE IT RESOLVED, that no later than March 15, 1990, Hennepin County requests each municipality to identify one or more sites within the municipality and issue all required permits for the composting of yard waste collected within that municipality; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a municipality may satisfy the above request by entering into an agreement that allows deposit and composting of yard waste collected within that municipality in another municipality; and • BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any municipality that does not either identify such a yard waste composting site within its borders and issue required permits, or enter into an agreement with another municipality for deposit and composting of its yard waste, shall not be eligible for recycling reimbursement under the county's funding assistance policy, unless the County Board specifically determines otherwise after a good faith effort. A. oe ch .�° REPORT/RECOMMENDATION \ leas v- �eae To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # VTT.F From: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: NOVE 4BER 16, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: 1990 COUNCIL MEETING To Council DATES Action Fx I Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Approval of the Council Meeting Schedule for 1990 as presented. Info /Background: In determining the dates for holidays in 1990 we find that in the months of January, February and September the regular Council Meeting falls on a holiday. I would recommend we follow the pattern established last year. In a month when the regular meeting falls on a holiday and there are five Mondays in the month, the Council meetings were held on the second and fourth Mondays. In a month with four Mondays the Council meeting was moved to the 'following Tuesday if the Monday was a holiday. That would result in the following Council Meeting schedule for 1990: January - Monday, January 8 and Monday, January 22 (Second and fourth Monday) (Monday-.,' January 1 7and Monday, January 15 are holidays) February - Monday, February 5 and Tuesday, February 20 (February 5 is first Monday - Monday, February 19 is a holiday) September - Tuesday, September 4 and Monday, September 17 (Monday, September 3 is a holiday - September 17 is third Monday) 1NA. o e • SIN. To: Ken Rosland From: Ralph Johnson Date: November 15, 1989 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION Subject: Set Board of Review Date_ Agenda Item # vzi.G Consent 0 Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑x To Council Action ❑x Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Recommendation: April 23, 1990, 5:00 P.M. Info /Background: April 23 appears to be an , open Monday for the Council. Boards of Review must adjorn by the end of May and are allowed 20 days to conduct their business. That would allow the setting of April 30 (another open Monday) but would preclude any meaningful extension of the 20 day period if one were needed. Any day of the week is satisfactory to this office but the council has shown a preference for Monday in previ- ous years.. The date needs to be selected now to allow time for printing amd mailing by mid December. Last years date was April 24th. RESOLUTION IN OPPOSITION TO HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPOSED RESOLUTION #89-11-96I R1 WHEREAS, Hennepin County is considering requiring each city to set up its .own compost site(s) within or without its borders, and WHEREAS, the penalty for failure to make such arrangement by March 15, 1990 is loss of funding for a city's recycling program, and WHEREAS, the City of Edina would incur significant expense in acquiring land and equipment to provide a compost site, and WHEREAS, the City of Edina has entered into contracts with Hennepin County for funding based on the effectiveness of the recycling program, and WHEREAS, the Edina recycling program for 1990 has been predicated upon.the continuation of the present Hennepin County funding policy, and WHEREAS, discontinuance of funding would jeopardize the future of the Edina Recycling Program, a program which has now surpassed the waste reduction goals set by the County; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina opposes passage of Proposed Resolution #89- 11- 961R1. ADOPTED this 20th day of November, 1989. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting'City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular-Meeting of November 20, 1989 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS. my hand and seal of said City this 22nd day of November, 1989. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk G 11 -20 -89 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 4214 - 822 -82 50- 4214 - 842 -84 50- 4214 - 862 -86 10- 4226 - 420 -42 9825 6581 10- 4204 - 140 -14 50- 4214 - 842 -84 10- 3130 - 000 -00 30- 3501 - 000 -00 30- 3501- 000 -00 10- 4208 - 480 -48 10- 4268 - 420 -42 89Q315 10- 4268- 420 -42 89Q315 10- 4901 - 420 -42 3425 3684 10- 4502- 420 -42 40- 4204 - 803 -80 10- 4204 - 420 -42 1044 30- 4504 - 781 -78 4411 30- 1340 - 000 -00 4402 10- 4202 - 640-64 10- 4612 - 560 -56 10- 4802 - 280 -28 10- 4206 - 140 -14 1 * * * -CKS 1989 CI�Y OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 324702 11/08/89 41.66 THE CHIEF OF POLICE ADVERTISING 324702 11/08/89 41.66 THE CHIEF OF POLICE ADVERTISING 324702 11/08/89 41.68 THE CHIEF OF POLICE ADVERTISING 125.00 * 324703 11/08/89 28.90 MINNCOMM PAGING EQUIPMENT RENTAL 28.90 * 324704 11/08/89 147.00 ELECTION ADM REPORT SUBSCRIPTION 147.00 * 324705 11/08/89 62.76 AMSTERDAM CALENDARS 62.76 * 324706 11/08/89 51.00 CUSTOM REFRIGERATION REFUND 51.00 * 324707 11/08/89 100.00 PAT GREER EXHIBIT FEE OCT 100.00 * 324708 11/08/89 210.00 LOIS HEIM COMMISSION OCT 210.00 * 324709 11/08/89 94.08 FRANCIS CALLAHAN OCT MILEAGE 94.08 * 324710 11/08/89 180.00 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL TELETYPE SERV 324710 11/08/89 150.00 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL TELETYPE SERV 330.00 * 324711 11/08/89 382.00 LITTLE BLIND SPOT EQUIP REPLACEMENT 382.00 * 324712 11/08/89 23.95 ANDERSON PUBLUSHING BOOKS 23.95 * 324713 11/08/89 59.00 AWWA DUES 59.00 * 324714 11/08/89 15.00 ASSO OF TRAINING SUBSCRIPTION 15.00 * 324715 11/08/89 90.00 GANNETT PROD SERV GENERAL SUPPLIES 90.00 * 324716 11/08/89 980.00 THE FITNESS STORE EQUIPMENT 980.00 * 324717 11/08/89 39.66 DIANE SANKEY SCHOOL 324717 11/08/89 4.00 DIANE SANKEY GAS 324717 11/08/89 14.00 DIANE SANKEY PARKING 57.66 * * * * ** 324719 11/08/89 20.00 ASSO OF METRO MEETING EXPENSE G 11 -20 -89 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 4214 - 822 -82 50- 4214 - 842 -84 50- 4214 - 862 -86 10- 4226 - 420 -42 9825 6581 10- 4204 - 140 -14 50- 4214 - 842 -84 10- 3130 - 000 -00 30- 3501 - 000 -00 30- 3501- 000 -00 10- 4208 - 480 -48 10- 4268 - 420 -42 89Q315 10- 4268- 420 -42 89Q315 10- 4901 - 420 -42 3425 3684 10- 4502- 420 -42 40- 4204 - 803 -80 10- 4204 - 420 -42 1044 30- 4504 - 781 -78 4411 30- 1340 - 000 -00 4402 10- 4202 - 640-64 10- 4612 - 560 -56 10- 4802 - 280 -28 10- 4206 - 140 -14 1 * * * -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -20 -89 PAGE 2 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 20.00 * 324720 11/08/89 245.00 DIXIE KOPP AMBULANCE REFUND 10- 3180 - 000 -00 245.00 * 324721 11/08/89 196.00 MARIE RYLANDER AMBULANCE REFUND 10- 3180 - 000 -00 196.00 * 324722 324722 11/08/89 11/08/89 35.00 35.00 AAGARD AAGARD RECYCLING 50- 4250 - 821 -82 1424 324722 11/08/89 35.00 AAGARD RECYCLING RECYCLING 50- 4250 - 841 -84 50- 4250- 861 -86 1425 1423 105.00 * 324723 11/08/89 18.00 SEDGWICK HTG /AIR CON REFUND 10- 3130 - 000 -00 18.00 * 324724 11/08/89 1,524 84 1, 532.34*f-5a--64- BARTLEY LINDSAY CO BOOST PUMP 40- 4540 - 801 -80 4252 324725 11/08/89 1,864.50 MIKE ALM CONSTR ROOF REPAIR 10- 4248 - 560 -56 11 3925 1,864.50 * 324726 11/08/89 2,019.82 THE WAVE CAR WASHES CAR WASHES 10- 4296 - 560 -56 3789 2,019.82 * 324727 11/08/89 262.50 DeVERNS INC CONTRACTED REPAIRS 30- 4248 - 782 -78 9333 4405 262.50 * 324728 11/08/89 300.00 BRAUN PAVEMENT TECH ROAD TESTING 60- 1300 - 291 -04 300.00 * 324729 324729 11/08/89 11/08/89 35.89 85.32 NAOMI JOHNSON NAOMI JOHNSON GENERAL SUPPLIES 23- 4504 - 612 -61 121.21 * CRAFT SUPPLIES 23- 4588- 611 -61 324730 11/08/89 29.35 NW TELEPRODUCTIONS REFUND 40- 3800 - 000 -00 29.35 * 324731 11/08/89 2,750.00 MARY D WALTERS PHONE CONSULTANT 10- 4256 - 510 -51 2,750.00 * 324732 11/08/89 25.92 STEVE JOHNSON SCHOOL 10- 4202 - 280 -28 25.92 * 324733 11/08/89 99.50 PIVAR COMPUTING SERV DISK CONVERSION 10- 4504- 510 -51 292462 4324 99.50 * 324734 11/08/89 403.25 MN STATE FIRE UFC BOOKS 10- 4650 - 440 -44 4062 403.25 * 324735 11/08/89 10.00 RICHARD E NELSON REFUND 10- 1145 - 000 -00 10.00 * 324736 11/08/89 702.00 LIZ GEREBI PAYMENT 30- 3505- 000 -00 702.00 * • a 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 324737 11/08/89 30.00 FLORIDA FOLIAGE MAG DUES 30.00 * 324738 11/08/89 344.06 WOODLAKE SANITARY HAUL RUBBISH 344.06 * 324739 11/08/89 480.00 JOHN H EKLUND HAUL RUBBISH 480.00 * 324740 11/08/89 58.20 VOTER REG /ELEC SEC POSTAGE 58.20 * 324741 11/08/89 10.00 PRYOR RESOURCES INC SEMINAR 10.00 * 324742 11/08/89 231.18 MILTONA TURF PROD ACCESSORIES 231.18 * 324743 11/08/89 67.50 MAHA DIST 6 PROGRAM AD 67.50 * 324744 11/08/89 125.72 BECKER & ASSOC INC REPAIRS 125.72 * 324745 11/08/89 480.00 NANCY KNUDSON PRO SERV 480.00 * 324746 11/08/89 340.00 DAVID J ALLEN GROUP PRO SERV 340.00 * * * * * ** 324748 11/13/89 275.00 OUTPOST HUNT /SPORTS AMMO /GUN RANGE 324748 11/13/89 176.00 OUTPOST HUNT /SPORTS AMMO /GUN RANGE 324748 11/13/89 550.00 OUTPOST HUNT /SPORTS AMMO /GUN RANGE 1,001.00 * 324749 11/13/89 117.00 YELLOW PAGES OF AM ADVERTISING 117.00 * 324750 11/13/89 128.27 PRENTICE HALL DPM NEWS 128.27 * 324751 11/13/89 35.00 0 JOHN SCHIRMANG REIMBURSEMENT 35.00 * 324752 11/13/89 43.38 FINANCE & COMMERCE BOND REFUNDING 43.38 * 324753 11/13/89 12,030.00 PUBLIC FINANCE SYST BOND REFUNDING 12,030.00 * 324754 11/13/89 1,260.00 AMERICAN FINANCIAL BOND REFUNDING 1,260.00 * 4& 11 -20 -89 PAGE 3 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 30- 4204 - 781 -78 11048 4483 10-4250- 644 -64 2910 4438 10- 4250 - 644 -64 4393 10- 4290 - 140-14 40- 3800 - 000 -00 27- 4504- 664 -66 1736 4274 28- 4204 - 701 -70 4423 28- 4248 - 702 -70 12027 3637 28- 4201 - 701 -70 30- 4201 - 781 -78 29- 4572 - 722 -72 0104 4034 29- 4572 - 722 -72 0103 4293 29- 4572 - 722 -72 0102 4409 10- 4210 - 140 -14 4492 10- 4504- 510 -51 10- 4202 - 000 -00 10- 1145 - 000 -00 99930 10 -1145- 000 -00 10- 1145 - 000 -00 - r r * * * -CKS 4 A 41 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -20 -89 PAGE CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 324755 11/13/89 21.00 - gi.89- AMERICAN PW ASSO SEMINAR REPORTS 10- 4202 - 260 -26 P14005 21.00* ai.09 ' * 324756 11/13/89 97.00 DUN & BRADSTREET SEMINAR 10- 4202 - 440 -44 97.00 * 324757 11/13/89 15.00 ALLEN ROTHE SCHOOL 10- 4202 - 440 -44 324757 11/13/89 11.50 ALLEN ROTHE MEETING EXPENSE 10- 4206 - 440 -44 324757 11/13/89 10.50 ALLEN ROTHE MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 440 -44 37.00 * 324758 11/13/89 13,253.00 METRO REFUSE GARBAGE 10- 4201 - 395 -30 110900 324758 11/13/89 27.00 METRO REFUSE GARAGE 10- 4201 - 395 -30 110907 324758 11/13/89 1,161.00 METRO REFUSE GARBAGE 10- 4201 - 395 -30 110905 324758 11/13/89 1,375.00 METRO REFUSE GARBAGE 10- 4201 - 395 -30 110941 324758 11/13/89 63.00 METRO REFUSE GARBAGE 10- 4201 - 395 -30 110901 15,879.00 * 324759 11/13/89 200,000.00 NORWEST BANK MN NA BOND PRINCIPLE 10- 1145 - 000 -00 55021 324759 11/13/89 35,396.00 NORWEST BANK MN NA BOND INTEREST 10- 1145- 000 -00 55021 235,396.00 * 324760 11/13/89 10.10 HAMILTON /AVENT ELEC CHIP 50- 4540 - 861 -86 4183 324760 11/13/89 6.34 HAMILTON /AVENT ELEC CHIP 50- 4540 - 861 -86 4183 16.44 * 324761 11/13/89 399.90 REHBEIN ENTERP PERSONNEL INCENTIES 10- 4504 - 500 -50 399.90 * 324762 11/13/89 337.29 LARSON FORMS PRINTING 27- 4600 - 661 -66 2564 4151 337.29 * 324763 11/13/89 225.00 PRESTO CLEANING CLEAN CARPET 27- 4201 - 662 -66 4906 3955 225.00 * 324764 11/13/89 49.50 KB ART MATERIALS SUBSCRIPTION 23- 4204 - 611 -61 49.50 * 324765 11/13/89 225.00 HARRIS WHS /SALES REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 669 -66 225.00 * .4347 324766 11/13/89 2,957.00 CURT KRIENS CONSTR CONSTRUCTION 27- 1300 - 005 -00 4174 2,957.00 * 324767 11/14/89 2,312.00 CUSTOM MICRO SYST COMPUTER 10- 4902 - 507 -50 007583 4295 2,312.00 * 324768 11/14/89 409.10 ST STEPHENS REFUND 40- 3800 - 000 -00 409.10 * 324769 11/14/89 50.00 GROTH MUSIC MUSIC 10- 4596 - 627 -62 54451 50.00 * 324770 11/14/89 200.00 DAVID KORTZ & CO HARP SERVICES 30- 4201 - 781 -78 4 w 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -20 -89 PAGE 5 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 200.00 * 324771 11/14/89 45.00 BRUCE GATES REIMBURSEMENT 10- 4202 - 440 -44 45.00 * 324772 11/14/89 14,600.07 VICTOR CARLSON PAYMENT 60- 2040 - 000 -00 14,600.07 * 324773 11/14/89 559,672.21 PROGRESSIVE CONTRACT PAYMENT 60- 2040 - 000 -00 559,672.21 * 324774 11/14/89 262,396.18 LUNDA CONSTRUCT PAYMENT 60- 2040 - 000 -00 262,396.18 * 324775 11/14/89 62,579.84 GL CONTRACTING PAYMENT 60- 2040 - 000 -00 62,579.84 * 324776 11/14/89 3,025.70 BURY & CARLSON PAYMENT 60- 2040 - 000 -00 3,025.70 * 324777 11/14/89 7,409.65 S M HENTGES & SONS PAYMNET 60- 2040 - 000 -00 7,409.65 * 324778 11/14/89 13,680.00 E H RENNER PAYMENT 60- 2040 - 000 -00 13,680.00 * 324779 11/14/89 41,939.68 MIDWEST ASPHALT PAYMENT 60- 2040 - 000 -00 41,939.68 * 324780 11/14/89 356.24 EDINA FIREMENS COPIER 10- 4201 - 440 -44 356.24 * 324781 11/14/89 21,795.47 O&P CONTRACTING PAYMENT 60- 2040 - 000 -00 21,795.47 * 324782 11/14/89 6,000.00 MOODY INVESTORS RATING 10- 1145- 000 -00 6,000.00 * 324783 11/14/89 60,000.00 MARQUETTE BANK MPLS TRUST 10- 1090 - 000 -00 60,000.00 * 324784 11/14/89 234.00 BOBO ZINN AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 324784 11/14/89 94.20 BOBO ZINN CRAFT SUPPLIES 23- 4588 - 611 -61 328.20 * 324785 11/14/89 225.49 MOLLIE PAULSON ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 324785 11/14/89 269.29 MOLLIE PAULSON PERSONNEL SERVICE 23- 4120 - 613 -61 494.78 * 324786 11/14/89 168.00 MONICA RUDQUIST MAINT PT 23- 4201 - 611 -61 324786 11/14/89 420.00 MONICA RUDQUIST AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 588.00 * 324787 11/14/89 55.00 DAVID RICKERT PRINTING AC 23- 4600 - 611 -61 55.00 * \ � r w 11 -20 -89 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -6.1 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 6 1 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 324788 11/14/89 60.00 JUDY SMITH AC INSTRUCTOR 60.00 * 324789 11/14/89 60.00 DELORES PAUL AC INSTRUCTOR 60.00 * 324790 11/14/89 70.00 DANIEL OFFERMAN AC INSTRUCTOR 70.00 * 324791 11/14/89 50.00 DESMOND FISHMAN AC INSTRUCTOR 50.00 * 324792 11/14/89 70.00 ANDREW ZIMMER AC INSTRUCTOR 70.00 * 324793 11/14/89 192.00 DOROTHY ODLAND AC INSTRUCTOR 192.00 * 324794 11/14/89 156.00 PHYLLIS PETERSON AC INSTRUCTOR 156.00 * 324795 11/14/89 144.00 CYD WICKER AC INSTRUCTOR 144.00 * 324796 11/14/89 125.00 JENNY CHAN AC INSTRUCTOR 125.00 * 324797 11/14/89 1,083.00 MARGARET MCDOWELL AC INSTRUCTOR 1,083.00 * 324798 11/14/89 180.00 NICK LEGEROS AC INSTRUCTOR 180.00 * 324799 11/14/89 80.00 PHYLLIS HAYWA AC INSTRUCTOR 80.00 * 324800 11/14/89 168.00 COLLEEN HAAS AC INSTRUCTOR 168.00 * 324801 11/14/89 168.00 HARRY HEIM AC INSTRUCTOR 168.00 * 324802 11/14/89 240.00 MARGARET GUST AC INSTRUCTOR 240.00 * 324803 11/14/89 540.00 JEAN GRAPP AC INSTRUCTOR 540.00 * 324804 11/14/89 112.00 BOB CONNOLLY AC INSTRUCTOR 112.00 * 324805 11/14/89 298.00 TOBIE DICKER AC INSTRUCTOR 298.00 * 324806 11/14/89 915.00 MARIAN ALSTAD AC INSTRUCTOR w 11 -20 -89 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -6.1 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 6 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -20 -89 PAGE 7 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 915.00 * 324807 11/14/89 168.00 BETSY BRYANT AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 168.00 * 324808 11/14/89 399.00 BILL DIETRICHSON AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 399.00 * 324809 11/14/89 360.00 SUSAN FRAME AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 360.00 * 324810 11/14/89 450.00 PAT GEISHEKER AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 450.00 * 324811 11/14/89 150.00 DICK GREEN AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 150.00 * 324812 11/14/89 30.00 JANE RIFFEY AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 30.00 * 324813 11/14/89 99.75 ED 2INS ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 99.75 * 324814 11/14/89 74.13 ANN WIDERSTROM ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 74.13 * 324815 11/14/89 113.05 BETTY THOMPSON ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 113.05 * 324816 11/14/89 160.75 SPECIAL EFFECTS ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 160.75 * 324817 11/14/89 52.50 MONICA RUDQUIST ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 52.50 * 324818 11/14/89 57.05 JANE RIFFEY ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 57.05 * 324819 11/14/89 138.60 BETTY PEDDIE ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 138.60 * 324820 11/14/89 114.80 SHARON MCKISSON ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 114.80 * 324821 11/14/89 45.50 BARBARA LUNDGREN ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 45.50 * 324822 11/14/89 92.18 ALAN & BETH ART WORK SOLD 23-3625-000 -00 92.18 * 324823 11/14/89 84.00 JEAN HAEFELE ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 84.00 * 324824 11/14/89 41.30 NORMA HANLON ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 41.30 * 1989 CITY OF EDINA VENDOR CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 324825 11/14/89 46.20 ART WORK SOLD CHERI DOYLE 46.20 * 324826 11/14/89 269.50 ART WORK SOLD MAUREEN BROCKWAY 269.50 * 324827 11/14/89 33.60 APPLICATION FEE BRUCE WARNER 33.60 * 324828 11/14/89 112.00 REIMBURSEMENT ITI 112.00 * 324829 11/14/89 49.00 AMBULANCE REFUND BARBARA A SPANGRUD 49.00 * 324830 11/14/89 44.80 PRO SERV 44.80 * 324831 11/14/89 30.80 30.80 * 324832 11/14/89 57.00 57.00 * 324833 11/14/89 12.00 12.00 * 324834 11/14/89 300,.00 300.00 * 324835 11/14/89 105.00 105.00 * 324836 11/14/89 89.00 89.00 * 324837 11/14/89 21.50 21.50 * 324838 11/14/89 129.00 129.00 * 324839 11/14/89 181.36 181.36 * 324840 11/14/89 29.74 29.74 * 324841 11/14/89 600.00 600.00 * 324842 11/14/89 125.00 125.00 * * * * * ** �M► CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION DONNA GARLINGHOUSE ART WORK SOLD NAN GRIMSBY ART WORK SOLD SUSAN FRAME ART WORK SOLD CHERI DOYLE ART WORK SOLD MARY DOOLEY BURNS ART WORK SOLD KAREN COWAN ART WORK SOLD MAUREEN BROCKWAY ART WORK SOLD KLIERS NURSEY INC SOIL MN DEPT OF PUBLIC APPLICATION FEE BRUCE WARNER WALL HANGING MN /AAPT REGISTRATION DIANE SANKEY REIMBURSEMENT ITI BOOK COLLEEN C RYAN AMBULANCE REFUND JOHN W RAINE AMBULANCE REFUND BARBARA A SPANGRUD AMBULANCE REFUND ESPECIALLY RENTAL ROXANNE SEIDEL PRO SERV 11 -20 -89 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 23- 3625 - 000 -00 23- 3625- 000 -00 23- 3625 - 000 -00 23- 3625 - 000 -00 23- 3625 - 000 -00 23- 3625- 000 -00 23- 3625 - 000 -00 27- 4562 - 664 -66 41201 2530 10- 4310 - 840 -84 27- 4248 - 662 -66 10- 4206 - 260 -26 10- 4233 - 560 -56 10- 4502 - 440 -44 10- 3180 - 000 -00 10- 3180 - 000 -00 10- 3180 - 000 -00 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4201 - 781 -78 8 * * * -CKS 1( k -40 11 -20 -89 PAGE 9 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 4204 - 820 -82 * ** -CKS 50- 4632 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 440 -44 599777 4063 27- 1300 - 003 -00 600023 8742 60- 1300 - 131 -07 600807 8742 * ** -CKS 27- 4624 - 663 -66 8919 * ** -CKS 10- 4262 - 440 -44 10- 4262 - 482 -48 10- 4262 - 520 -52 27- 4262 - 663 -66 30- 4262 - 782 -78 50- 4262 - 821 -82 50- 4262 - 841 -84 50- 4262 - 861 -86 * ** -CKS 10- 4248 - 644 -64 * ** -CKS 10- 4528- 314 -30 12877 10- 4528 - 314 -30 13403 10- 4540- 540 -54 13703 * ** -CKS 30- 4202 - 781 -78 * ** -CKS 40- 1220 - 000 -00 603498 1802 40- 4540 - 807 -80 603275 1802 41 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 324A02 11/08/89 290.00 50 & FRANCE BUS ASSN DUES 290.00 * kkkk *k 324A07 11/13/89 298.80 ALL -AMER BOTTLING MIX 298.80 * kkk *kk 324A29 11/14/89 11.30 ALBINSON MAPS 324A29 11/13/89 22.54 ALBINSON BLUE PRINTS 324A29 11/13/89 558.60 ALBINSON CONSTRUCTION 592.44 * kkkkkk 324A41 11/14/89 428.60 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE MEAT 428.60 * kkkkkk 324A49 11/08/89 239.95 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 324A49 11/08/89 9.07 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 324A49 11/08/89 138.93 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 324A49 11/14/89 37.38 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 324A49 11/08/89 437.99 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 324A49 11/08/89 61.99 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 324A49 11/08/89 57.63 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 324A49 11/08/89 81.73 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 1,064.67 * k k k k k k 324A68 11/13/89 540.75 ARPS TREE SERVICE CONTRACTED REPAIRS 540.75 * kkkkkk 324A98 11/13/89 757.75 AVR INC CONCRETE 324A98 11/13/89 285.68 AVR INC CONCRETE 324A98 11/13/89 368.05 AVR INC CONCRETE 1,411.48 * kkkkkk 324605 11/14/89 294.36 BACH -BILL CONFERENCE k k k k k k 294.36 * 324807 11/14/89 858.92 BADGER METER INC WATER METERS 324807 11/08/89 385.18 BADGER METER INC METER PARTS 1,244.10 * 1( k -40 11 -20 -89 PAGE 9 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 4204 - 820 -82 * ** -CKS 50- 4632 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 440 -44 599777 4063 27- 1300 - 003 -00 600023 8742 60- 1300 - 131 -07 600807 8742 * ** -CKS 27- 4624 - 663 -66 8919 * ** -CKS 10- 4262 - 440 -44 10- 4262 - 482 -48 10- 4262 - 520 -52 27- 4262 - 663 -66 30- 4262 - 782 -78 50- 4262 - 821 -82 50- 4262 - 841 -84 50- 4262 - 861 -86 * ** -CKS 10- 4248 - 644 -64 * ** -CKS 10- 4528- 314 -30 12877 10- 4528 - 314 -30 13403 10- 4540- 540 -54 13703 * ** -CKS 30- 4202 - 781 -78 * ** -CKS 40- 1220 - 000 -00 603498 1802 40- 4540 - 807 -80 603275 1802 41 v 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE * * * * ** 324617 11/08/89 324617 11/08/89 * * * * ** 324622 11/13/89 324B22 11/08/89 324622 11/08/89 324622 11/08/89 * * * * ** ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. 324625 11/08/89 * * * * ** 324627. 11/14/89 324627 11/14/89 324627 11/14/89 * * * * ** 10096 324630 11/13/89 324630 11/13/89 324630 11/13/89 324630 11/13/89 324830 11/13/89 324830 11/13/89 324830 11/13/89 324630 11/08/89 324630 11/08/89 * * * * ** 324632 11/13/89 * * * * ** 324642 11/08/89 * * * * ** 324861 11/08/89 * * * * ** CHECK REGISTER 11 -20 -89 PAGE 10 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 179.20 BFI RECYCLING SYS CONTRACTED SERVICES 10- 4226 - 507 -50 10096 32,734.45 BFI RECYCLING SYS RECYCLING 10- 4226 - 507 -50 10079 32,913.65 * ** -CKS 691.10 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 27- 4630- 663 -66 621.80 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 50- 4630 - 822 -82 1,405.50 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 50- 4630 - 842 -84 2,734.66 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 50- 4630 - 862 -86 5,453.06 * ** -CKS 100.00 BENNETT -WAYNE POLICE SERV 10- 4100 - 430 -42 100.00 * ** -CKS 189.00 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 50- 4626 - 822 -82 497.50 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 50- 4626 - 842 -84 499.50 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 50- 4626 - 862 -86 1,186.00 * ** -CKS 4.64 BERTELSON BROS. INC. TAPE 10- 4504 - 140 -14 515401 19.52 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 515401 16.22 BERTELSON BROS. INC. LIQUID PAPER 10- 4504 - 420 -42 515240 263.67 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 515397 84.67 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 515382 32.07 BERTELSON BROS. INC. SIGNAGE 10- 4504- 520 -52 515921 6.56 BERTELSON BROS. INC. TAPE DISPENSER 10- 4504 - 600 -60 515397 3.80 BERTELSON BROS. INC. CALENDAR 10- 4516 - 440 -44 509409 4058 34.36 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 28- 4516 - 701 -70 512638 4320 465.51 * * ** -CKS 245.75 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 97100 4117 245.75 * * ** -CKS 22.98 BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY PHOTO FINISHING 10- 4508 - 440 -44 871181 22.98 * * ** -CKS 913.45 BOUSTEAD ELEC & MFG. REPAIR CD METER 10- 4248 - 460 -46 269528 4251 913.45 * * ** -CKS . fir► * ** -CKS �40 6970 4543 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 50- 4630 - 822 -82 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 324677 11/08/89 1,673.40 BRAUN ENG TESTNG INC PRO ENG SERV 324B77 11/14/89 1,168.95 BRAUN ENG TESTNG INC PRO SERV ENG * ** -CKS 2,842.35 * 4849 *kkkkk 4847 50- 4248 - 861 -86 4848 324882 11/08/89 64.81 BRUNSON INSTRUMENT TAPES 324B82 11/08/89 13.56 BRUNSON INSTRUMENT FLAGGING 78.37 * kkkkkk ' 324891 11/08/89 1,032.50 BURY & CARLSON INC. BLACKTOP 324891 11/08/89 1,525.00 BURY & CARLSON INC. BLACKTOP 2,557.50 * kkkkkk 324C01 11/08/89 321.29 C & S DISTRIBUTING COST /GOODS SOLD 324C01 11/13/89 442.34 C & S DISTRIBUTING COST /GOODS SOLD 324C01 11/13/89 69.62- C & S DISTRIBUTING CREDIT 324C01 11/08/89 42.93 C & S DISTRIBUTING COST /GOODS SOLD 736.94 * k k k k k k 324C17 11/13/89 47.00 CDP TONER 324C17 11/13/89 44.00- CDP CREDIT 3.00 * k *kkkk 324C23 11/14/89 49.00 CORE RESTORE CHARGE CARTRIDGE 49.00 * kkkkkk 324C30 11/08/89 74.60 CITY BEER BEER 324C30 11/08/89 110.80 CITY BEER BEER 185.40 * kkkkkk 324C33 11/13/89 625.00 CITY OF EDINA GARBAGE 625.00 * 324C34 11/14/89 76.72 CITY OF RICHFIELD POWER 76.72 * kkkk *k 324C36 11/08/89 12.25 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV WINDOW CLEANING 324C36 11/08/89 12.25 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV WINDOW CLEANING 324C36 11/08/89 12.25 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV WINDOW CLEANING 11 -20 -89 PAGE 11 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 60- 1300 - 289 -04 19050 60- 1300 - 290 -04 19224 * ** -CKS 10- 4604 - 260 -26 078538 8743 10- 4604 - 260 -26 078556 8743 * ** -CKS 10- 4524- 301 -30 40- 4524 - 803 -80 * ** -CKS 23- 4624 - 613 -61 94690 4144 23- 4624 - 613 -61 095017 4227 23- 4624 - 613 -61 15574 23- 4624 - 613 -61 094725 4144 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 540 -54 10- 4504 - 540 -54 * ** -CKS 27- 4516- 661 -66 6970 4543 * ** -CKS 50- 4630 - 822 -82 50- 4630 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS 50- 4250 - 821 -82 1814 41 -4252- 900 -90 * ** -CKS 50- 4248 - 821 -82 4849 50- 4248 - 841 -84 4847 50- 4248 - 861 -86 4848 i MIq 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 324C44 11/13/89 324C44 11/08/89 324C44 11/08/89 324C44 11/08/89 324C45 11/13/89 324C46 11/13/89 AMOUNT VENDOR 324C49 11/13/89 * *kk ** # MESSAGE 324C51 11/08/89 324C64 11/14/89 324C64 11/14/89 324C64 11/14/89 kkk * ** 324C87 11/08/89 * ** -CKS 421.25 324C89 11/08/89 k *kkk* 324D05 11/08/89 324D05 11/14/89 kkk * *k 50- 4632 - 822 -82 324D07 11/08/89 *k * *kk 753.44 i MIq CHECK REGISTER 11 -20 -89 PAGE 12 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 36.75 * ** -CKS 421.25 COCA COLA BOTTLING COKE 27- 4624 - 663 -66 198.26 COCA COLA BOTTLING MIX 50- 4632 - 822 -82 753.44 COCA COLA BOTTLING MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 484.21 COCA COLA BOTTLING MIX 50- 4632 - 862 -86 1,857.16 * 255.00 255.00 * COLLINS ELECTRIC SET WOOD POLES 10- 4248 - 322 -30 A5929 4447 14.99 COLOR TILE SUPPLIES 50- 1300 - 003 -00 698746 14.99 * * ** -CKS 1,520.00 COMPUTERLAND PRINTER 30- 1330 - 000 -00 4155 1,520.00 * ** *-CKS 623.80 COMM OF REVENUE FUEL TAX 10- 4612 - 560 -56 002068 623.80 * * ** -CKS 344.37 CONT- MINNESOTA SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 663 -66 238.13 CONT- MINNESOTA CLEAN 27- 4512 - 663 -66 CONT- MINNESOTA FOOD 27- 4624 - 663 -66 2,651.83 * * ** -CKS 45.91 CURTIN MATHESON SCI LAB MEDIA 10- 4504 - 482 -48 2872 45.91 * * ** -CKS 147.55 147.55 * CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 41084 4313 * ** -CKS 251.50 175.50 D. C. ANNIS SEWER D. C. ANNIS SEWER CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 646 -64 1785 4189 427.00 * CLEAN SEWER LINE 10- 4248 - 646 -64 1881 4460 * ** -CKS 45.00 45.00 * D. C. HEY CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 702 -70 139528 * ** -CKS AMOUNT 143.10 143.10 * 66.00 66.00 * 100.00 100.00 * 81.00 81.00 * 2,761.05 8,873.65 8,083.91 19,718.61 * 39.00 39.00 * 706.44 706.44 * 26.00 26.00 * 120.00 25.50 115,362.00 115,507.50 * 464.00 464.00 * 121.00 121.00 * . 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 324D27 11/14/89 DAVIDSEN DIST. INC. BEER 324D29 11/08/89 * * * * ** SIGNAGE 324D61 11/08/89 * * * * ** BEER 324E14 11/14/89 * * * * ** SUBSCRIPTION 324E17 11/08/89 324E17 11/08/89 324E17 11/08/89 * * * * ** MEETING EXP RES 324E23 11/08/89 * * * * ** PROJECT SCHEDULING 324E32 11/14/89 324E33 11/08/89 * * * * ** 324E41 11/08/89 324E41 11/08/89 324E41 11/14/89 * * * * ** 324E51 11/08/89 * * * * ** 324E94 11/08/89 AMOUNT 143.10 143.10 * 66.00 66.00 * 100.00 100.00 * 81.00 81.00 * 2,761.05 8,873.65 8,083.91 19,718.61 * 39.00 39.00 * 706.44 706.44 * 26.00 26.00 * 120.00 25.50 115,362.00 115,507.50 * 464.00 464.00 * 121.00 121.00 * M . CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION DAVE S FOOD WAGON DAIRY DAVIDSEN DIST. INC. BEER DICK NISSEN POLICE SERV EARL F. ANDERSON SIGNAGE EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER ECONOMIC PRESS SUBSCRIPTION EASTMAN KODAK CO MAINT AGREEMENT EDINA CHAM OF COM CHAMBER MEETING EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS TRANSPORTATION EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS MEETING EXP RES EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS ELEVATOR EGGHEAD SOFTWARE PROJECT SCHEDULING ESS BROS & SONS CATCH BASIN M . 11 -20 -89 PAGE 13 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 27- 4624 - 663 -66 * ** -CKS 50- 4630 - 842 -84 * ** -CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 27- 4504 - 666 -66 92595 4330 * ** -CKS 50- 4630 - 822 -82 50- 4630 - 842 -84 50- 4630 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS 10- 4204 - 440 -44 4059 * ** -CKS 10- 4288 - 510 -51 10- 4206 - 140 -14 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 624 -62 10- 4206 - 430 -42 11- 4201 - 127 -12 * ** -CKS 50-1300- 003 -00 3385 * ** -CKS 41- 4504- 900 -90 1473 4197 M s 11 -20 -89 PAGE 14 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 4901- 420 -42 42203 4488 * ** -CKS 40- 4622 - 805 -80 131604 1670 40- 4622 - 805 -80 72074 1670 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 510 -51 * ** -CKS 10- 4262 - 301 -30 10- 4262 - 560 -56 10- 4262 - 646 -64 10- 4512 - 540 -54 28- 4262 - 702 -70 30- 4262 - 782 -78 40- 4262 - 801 -80 * ** -CKS 10- 4226 - 301 -30 32278 10- 4294 - 560 -56 32277 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 301 -30 10- 4504 - 646 -64 40- 4504- 801 -80 * ** -CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 29- 4572 - 722 -72 11622 4408 29- 4572 - 722 -72 11622 4408 29- 4572- 722 -72 11622 4408 29- 4648 - 722 -72 11622 4408 * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION * * * * ** 324F02 11/13/89 182.69 FACILITY SYSTEMS PD REMODELING 182.69 * 324F11 11/13/89 2,037.70 FEED RITE CONTROL WATER CHEMICAL 324F11 11/08/89 90.00 FEED RITE CONTROL DEMURRAGE 2,127.70 * 324F70 11/08/89 84.73 FRIDEN ALCATEL TAPE /INK CARTRIDGE 84.73 * * * * * ** 324G01 11/13/89 496.90 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 324G01 11/13/89 225.00 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 324G01 11/13/89 240.22 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 324G01 11/13/89 223.35 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 324G01 11/13/89 49.44 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 324G01 11/13/89 16.08 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 324G01 11/13/89 246.75 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 1,497.74 * * * * * ** 324G24 11/13/89 19.00 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP RENTAL 324G24 11/13/89 266.25 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS MAINT CONTRACT 285.25 * * * * * ** 324G32 11/14/89 129.50 GOPHER STATE 1 CALL GENERAL SUPPLIES 324G32 11/14/89 64.75 GOPHER STATE 1 CALL GENERAL SUPPLIES 324G32 11/14/89 453.25 GOPHER STATE 1 CALL GENERAL SUPPLIES 647.50 * 324G38 11/08/89 100.00 GEORGE BUTLER POLICE SERV 100.00 * * * * * ** 324G42 11/14/89 933.32 GIL HEBARD GUNS AMMO /GUN RANGE 324G42 11/14/89 933.32- GIL HEBARD GUNS AMMO /GUN RANGE 324G42 11/14/89 93.32 GIL HEBARD GUNS AMMO /GUN RANGE 324G42 11/14/89 127.00 GIL HEBARD GUNS TARGETS /GUN RANGE 220.32 * * * * ** s 11 -20 -89 PAGE 14 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 4901- 420 -42 42203 4488 * ** -CKS 40- 4622 - 805 -80 131604 1670 40- 4622 - 805 -80 72074 1670 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 510 -51 * ** -CKS 10- 4262 - 301 -30 10- 4262 - 560 -56 10- 4262 - 646 -64 10- 4512 - 540 -54 28- 4262 - 702 -70 30- 4262 - 782 -78 40- 4262 - 801 -80 * ** -CKS 10- 4226 - 301 -30 32278 10- 4294 - 560 -56 32277 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 301 -30 10- 4504 - 646 -64 40- 4504- 801 -80 * ** -CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 29- 4572 - 722 -72 11622 4408 29- 4572 - 722 -72 11622 4408 29- 4572- 722 -72 11622 4408 29- 4648 - 722 -72 11622 4408 * ** -CKS -4W 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -20 -89 PAGE 15 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 324G57 11/08/89 170.30 GOPHER OIL CO. COMPRESSED OIL 28- 4504- 704 -70 385274 4299 170.30 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 324G94 11/13/89 195.88 GUSTAVE LARSON GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 377051 4115 195.88 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 324H03 11/08/89 141.50 HOLMSTEN ICE RINKS CONTRACT REPAIRS 30- 4248 - 782 -78 23825 4481 141.50 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 324H22 11/08/89 100.00 HAROLD SWANSON POLICE SERV 10- 4100 - 430 -42 100.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 324H38 11/14/89 162.48 HEDBERG AGGREGATES SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 702 -70 57357 324H38 11/14/89 10.00 HEDBERG AGGREGATES TREES /FLOWERS /SHRUBS 30- 4660- 783 -78 42228 2830 172.48 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 324H65 11/08/89 100.00 HOFFMAN- WILLIAM POLICE SERV 10- 4100 - 430 -42 100.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 324I45 11/08/89 13.00 INGMAN LAB INC. LAB TESTING 10- 4200 - 482 -48 13.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 324J23 11/08/89 304.00 JR JOHNSON SUP TREES/FLOWERS/SHRUBS 30- 4660 - 783 -78 45449 4351 304.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 324J27 11/08/89 66.64 JERRYS FOODS SOAK DISH) 10- 4512 - 440 -44 324J27 11/08/89 26.77 JERRYS FOODS GENERAL SUPPLIE 23- 4504- 611 -61 93.41 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 324J31 11/14/89 42.87 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10-4504- 301 -30 324J31 11/14/89 47.69 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 325 -30 324J31 11/14/89 23.57 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 343 -30 324J31 11/14/89 56.95 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 440 -44 324J31 11/14/89 20.60 JERRYS HARDWARE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 324J31 11/14/89 24.99 JERRYS HARDWARE ROOT FEEDER 10- 4560 - 644 -64 324J31 11/14/89 24.16 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 27- 4504- 664 -66 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 324J31 11/14/89 324J31 11/14/89 * * * * ** 324J35 11/08/89 * * * * ** 324K35 11/08/89 324K35 11/13/89 324K35 11/14/89 324K35 11/14/89 324K35 11/14/89 324K35 11/14/89 324K35 11/14/89 324K35 11/14/89 324K35 11/08/89 324K35 11/08/89 324K35 11/13/89 324K35 11/13/89 324K35 11/13/89 * * * * ** 324K57 11/13/89 * * * * ** 324L30 11/08/89 * * * * ** 32404 11/13/89 32404 11/13/89 * * * * ** 32406 11/08/89 * * * * ** 32408 11/08/89 * * * * ** 324L46 11/13/89 AMOUNT 30.13 49.10 320.06 * 45.87 45.87 * 20.37 58.95 35.94 50.14 21.19 9.35 42.52 119.39 2.13- 104.79 55.82 11.34- 2.40 507.39 * 5,214.10 5,214.10 * 1,250.00 1,250.00 * 48.25 91.66 139.91 * 243.95 243.95 * 576.00 576.00 * 60.13 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES JERRYS PRINTING KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KUETHER DIST. CO. LAYNE MINNESOTA CO LEEF BROS. INC LEEF BROS. INC LEFFLER PRINTING LEITNER COMPANY LIEN INFECTION CON FILING CARDS HARDWARE SIDING HAND TOOLS WOOD SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES SUPPLIES CREDIT REPAIR PLUMBING LUMBER FOR SHOP CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES BEER CONTRACTED REPAIRS SERVICES LAUNDRY PRINTING TOPDRESSING SERVICES y 11 -20 -89 PAGE 16 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 28- 4504 - 702 -70 40 -4504- 802 -80 10- 4504 - 260 -26 7870 10- 4504 - 646 -64 10- 4580 - 301 -30 10- 4580 - 646 -64 10- 4604 - 646 -64 27- 4504 - 662 -66 27- 4504 - 662 -66 27- 4504 - 662 -66 27- 4504 - 664 -66 28- 4248 - 702 -70 28- 4248 - 702 -70 40- 4504- 802 -80 40- 4504 - 802 -80 40- 4504 - 802 -80 50- 4630 - 842 -84 527960 439785 9966 496262 4384 496199 4387 410748 9823 548772 2912 527977 4308 496572 4031 496204 495441 4401 527985 4241 527987 527975 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 40- 4248 - 801 -80 16890 3984 23- 4201 - 612 -61 27- 4262 - 664 -66 30- 4600 - 781 -78 3923 27- 4562- 664 -66 27- 4201 - 663 -66 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 4136 * ** -CKS 8926 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 324L46 11/14/89 60.13 50- 4630 - 842 -84 BEER 120.26 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS PRO SERV 324L52 11/08/89 129.62 TREES /FLOWERS /SHRUBS 30- 4660 - 782 -78 16503 4487 129.62 * * * * * ** GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 560 -56 324L66 11/13/89 70.85 324L66 11/08/89 44.72 115.57 * * * * * ** 324L97 11/08/89 100.00 100.00 * * * * * ** 324M07 11/08/89 2,662.60 324M07 11/08/89 7,179.95 324M07 11/08/89 5,401.25 15,243.80 * * * * * ** 324M11 11/08/89 900.00 900.00 * * * * * ** 324M16 11/13/89 387.10 387.10 * * * * * ** 324M19 11/13/89 25.74 324M19 11/13/89 2,127.24 324M19 11/13/89 229.75 324M19 11/08/89 32.16 2,414.89 * * * * ** 324M25 11/13/89 28.66 324M25 11/08/89 9.30 324M25 11/14/89 15.19 324M25 11/08/89 27.64 80.79 * * * * ** 324M27 11/08/89 166.80 O CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION LIEN INFECTION CON CLEANING LINJO ASSOC H2O TREATMENT LONG LAKE FORD TRACT CONTRACTED REPAIRS LONG LAKE FORD TRACT REPAIR PARTS MERFELD -BERT POLICE SERV MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARTIN - MCALLISTER YL *l7i'*Lm01 *1telm MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY 11 -20 -89 PAGE 17 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 27- 4201 - 663 -66 8926\ * ** -CKS 30- 4564 - 783 -78 12555 4395 * ** -CKS 27- 4248 - 664 -66 96894 4465 27- 4540- 664 -66 96460 4309 * ** -CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS BEER 50 -4630- 822 -82 BEER 50- 4630 - 842 -84 BEER 50- 4630 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS PRO SERV 10- 4201 - 420 -42 2755 * ** -CKS TREES /FLOWERS /SHRUBS 30- 4660 - 782 -78 16503 4487 * ** -CKS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 560 -56 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 PAARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 ENGINE PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 4280 * ** -CKS MED OXYGEN & EQUIP BREATHING AIR 10- 4274 - 440 -44 MED OXYGEN & EQUIP DEMURRAGE 10- 4274 - 440 -44 MED OXYGEN & EQUIP 02 10- 4510 - 440 -44 1324 MED OXYGEN & EQUIP 02 10- 4510 - 440 -44 1324 * ** -CKS MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 28- 4512 - 702 -70 22909 4321 V v 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -20 -89 PAGE 18 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 324M27 11/08/89 492.40 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 30- 4512- 782 -78 324M27 11/13/89 464.10 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 30- 4512 - 782 -78 22967 4416 1,123.30 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 324M35 11/08/89 25,616.25 METRO WASTE CONTROL RESERV CAP CHG 10- 3095 - 000 -00 25,616.25 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 324M42 11/08/89 125.74 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 301 -30 2867 324M42 11/08/89 125.74 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 301 -30 2867 324M42 11/08/89 125.74- MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 301 -30 2867 324M42 11/08/89 97.72- MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 40- 4524- 900 -80 2867 324M42 11/08/89 97.72 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 40- 4524 - 900 -80 2867 324M42 11/08/89 97.72 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 40- 4524 - 900 -80 2867 223.46 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 324M44 11/14/89 90.28 MIDWEST CHEM SUPPLY PLASTIC LINERS 10- 4514 - 520 -52 26334 4436 90.28 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 324M46 11/14/89 137.32 METZ BAKING CO BREAD 27- 4624 - 663 -66 8925 137.32 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 324M54 11/13/89 32.00 MILLER -DAVIS CO. ABATEMENT FORMS 10- 4504 - 200 -20 660124 32.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 324M58 11/08/89 489.61 MILLIPORE LAB SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 482 -48 109384 4296 489.61 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 324M63 11/08/89 390.35 MN. BAR MIX 50- 4630 - 842 -84 324M63 11/08/89 185.52 MN. BAR MIX 50- 4632- 822 -82 324M63 11/08/89 187.10 MN. BAR MIX 50- 4632 - 862 -86 762.97 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 324M70 11/13/89 439.00 MN. CONWAY NOZZLE 10- 4504 - 440 -44 13714 3245 324M70 11/13/89 148.00 MN. CONWAY SHUT -OFF VALVE 10- 4901 - 440 -44 13715 3246 324M70 11/13/89 376.00 MN. CONWAY HOSE 10- 4901 - 440 -44 13716 3247 963.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 324M73 11/13/89 89.30 MN. ELEVATOR SERVICE CONTRACT 30- 4288 - 782 -78 100432 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 324017 11/08/89 28.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS SUPPLIES POLICE 10- 4504 - 510 -51 094560 1989 CITY OF EDINA 11/14/89 43.00 CHECK REGISTER PRODUCTS SUPPLIES 11 -20 -89 PAGE 49 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 11/08/89 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 89.30 4316 324017 11/08/89 28.00 OFFICE * * * * ** SUPPLIES POLICE 10- 4504 - 510 -51 094560 4316 324017 11/08/89 * ** -CKS 324M80 11/13/89 11.28 MN SUBURBAN NEWS OFFICIAL PUBLICATION 10- 4210- 140 -14 324M80 11/08/89 11.70 MN SUBURBAN NEWS NOTICE AERATION 10- 4210 - 140 -14 * * * * ** 324M80 11/08/89 40.96 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ADS FOR BIDS 10- 4210 - 140 -14 * ** -CKS 324M80 11/08/89 51.37 MN SUBURBAN NEWS LEGAL PUB 10- 4210 - 140 -14 324M80 11/08/89 19.33 MN SUBURBAN NEWS AD FOR BID 10- 4210 - 140 -14 324M80 11/08/89 17.43 MN SUBURBAN NEWS LEGAL PUB 10- 4210 - 140 -14 324M80 11/08/89 41.35 MN SUBURBAN NEWS OFFICAL PUBLICATION 10- 4210 - 140 -14 FIRE PRO. 324M80 11/08/89 31.68 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ADS FOR BIDS 10- 4210- 140 -14 324M80 11/14/89 1,682.00 MN SUBURBAN NEWS PRINTING 30- 4600 - 781 -78 1,907.10 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 324M85 11/13/89 43.50 MN. WANNER REPAIR WORK 10- 4248 - 560 -56 73644 43.50 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 324N16 11/14/89 13.56 N.S.P. COMPANY POWER 40- 4252 - 801 -80 13.56 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 324N68 11/08/89 172.80 NORTHSTAR ICE MIX 50- 4632 - 822 -82 324N68 11/08/89 278.64 NORTHSTAR ICE ICE 50- 4632 - 842 -84 324N68 11/08/89 352.62 NORTHSTAR ICE ICE 50- 4632 - 862 -86 804.06 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 324N82 11/08/89 72.95 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 165590 4226 324N82 11/13/89 26.85 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 - 61.165783 4229 99.80 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 324017 11/08/89 28.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS SUPPLIES POLICE 10- 4504 - 510 -51 094560 4316 324017 11/14/89 43.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 094716 4316 324017 11/08/89 28.00- OFFICE PRODUCTS SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 094560 4316 324017 11/08/89 28.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS SUPPLIES POLICE 10- 4504 - 510 -51 094560 4316 324017 11/08/89 2,296.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS NEW EQUIPMENT 10- 4901 - 470 -47 094222 4152 2,367.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 324030 11/14/89 36.76 OLD DUTCH FOODS CHIPS /PRETZELS 27- 4624- 663 -66 8920 36.76 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 324038 11/13/89 185.00 OLSON FIRE PRO. REMODELING 50- 1300 - 003 -00 8377 4499 V V v AMOUNT 185.00 * 942.74 942.74 * 25.90 44.80 41.00 1,746.00 1,857.70 * 139.05 342.27 237.07 718.39 * 942.25 942.25 * 91.13 91.13 * 95.00 27.20 122.20 * 52.00 52.00 * 69.07 69.07 69.07- 69.07 * 210.50 210.50 * 181.12 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION OWENS SERVICE CO PARK NIC MED CTR PARK NIC MED CTR PARK NIC MED CTR PARK NIC MED CTR PEPSI COLA BOTTLING PEPSI COLA BOTTLING PEPSI COLA BOTTLING PERSONNEL DECISIONS PETERSON- BARBARA PLUNKETTS PLUNKETTS PRINTERS SERV INC PRIOR LAKE AGG. PRIOR LAKE AGG. PRIOR LAKE AGG. QUALITY REFRIG QUIK PRINT CONTRACT REPAIRS SHOTS SHOTS HEARING TEST PHYSICAL MIX MIX MIX PRO SERV MILEAGE PRO SERV GENERAL SUPPLIES SHARPENING GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIRS PRINTING 11 -20 -89 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE kk *k *k 30- 4248 - 782 -78 324050 11/08/89 k k k k k k 324P11 11/13/89 324P11 11/08/89 324P11 11/08/89 324P11 11/13/89 k k k k k R 324P30 11/08/89 324P30 11/08/89 324P30 11/08/89 kkkkkk 324P34 11/08/89 324P35 11/13/89 kkkkkk 324P58 11/08/89 324P58 11/08/89 kkkkkk 8659 324P78 11/08/89 kkkkkk 324P80 11/08/89 324P80 11/08/89 324P80 11/08/89 kkkkkk 690043 324Q09 11/14/89 k k k k k k * ** -CKS 324Q22 11/08/89 AMOUNT 185.00 * 942.74 942.74 * 25.90 44.80 41.00 1,746.00 1,857.70 * 139.05 342.27 237.07 718.39 * 942.25 942.25 * 91.13 91.13 * 95.00 27.20 122.20 * 52.00 52.00 * 69.07 69.07 69.07- 69.07 * 210.50 210.50 * 181.12 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION OWENS SERVICE CO PARK NIC MED CTR PARK NIC MED CTR PARK NIC MED CTR PARK NIC MED CTR PEPSI COLA BOTTLING PEPSI COLA BOTTLING PEPSI COLA BOTTLING PERSONNEL DECISIONS PETERSON- BARBARA PLUNKETTS PLUNKETTS PRINTERS SERV INC PRIOR LAKE AGG. PRIOR LAKE AGG. PRIOR LAKE AGG. QUALITY REFRIG QUIK PRINT CONTRACT REPAIRS SHOTS SHOTS HEARING TEST PHYSICAL MIX MIX MIX PRO SERV MILEAGE PRO SERV GENERAL SUPPLIES SHARPENING GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIRS PRINTING 11 -20 -89 PAGE 20 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 30- 4248 - 782 -78 41675 4341 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 420 -42 10- 4201 - 420 -42 10- 4201 - 800 -80 10- 4212 - 510 -51 * ** -CKS 50- 4632 - 822 -82 50- 4632 - 842 -84 50- 4632 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 420 -42 8659 30- 4208 - 781 -78 * ** -CKS 23- 4201 - 611 -61 S34071 4143 28- 4504 - 702 -70 690043 * ** -CKS 28- 4274 - 704 -70 43510 * ** -CKS 40- 4504- 900 -80 40- 4504- 900 -80 40- 4504 - 900 -80 * ** -CKS 27- 4248 - 663 -66 66387 * ** -CKS 28- 4600 - 701 -70 035534 4323 ,;o 1 • \ 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE * * * * ** RADIO RENTAL NOV 324R13 11/08/89 * * * * ** 324R21 11/14/89 324R21 11/14/89 324R22 11/08/89 324R22 11/08/89 324R22 11/14/89 * * * * ** 324R33 11/13/89 324R33 11/13/89 324R33 11/14/89 * * * * ** 324R49 11/13/89 * * * * ** 140 324R69 11/14/89 * * * * ** 324R81 11/13/89 * * * * ** 0133 324515 11/13/89 * * * * ** FLOOR MAT 324534 11/13/89 * * * * ** 324536 11/08/89 324S36 11/08/89 AMOUNT 181.12 * 132.00 132.00 * 80.70 371.25 451.95 * 495.00 2,250.00 68.00 2,813.00 * 4,376.80 4,886.55 3,969.50 13,232.85 * 12.37 12.37 * 971.19 971.19 * 117.79 117.79 * 29.28 29.28 * 144.90 144.90 * 2,885.30 6,867.40 9,752.70 * CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 11 -20 -89 PAGE 21 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS RADIO INSTALLS RADIO RENTAL NOV 10- 4226 - 440 -44 15244 * ** -CKS RED WING SHOES LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 646 -64 200205 RED WING SHOES GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 260 -26 200205 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 140 4406 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 0133 4340 REM SUPPLIES FLOOR MAT 50- 4504 - 842 -84 0224 * ** -CKS REX DISTR. BEER 50- 4630 - 822 -82 REX DISTR. BEER 50- 4630 - 842 -84 REX DISTR. BEER 50- 4630 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS ROAD RESCUE LENS 10- 4504 - 440 -44 100518 3838 * ** -CKS ROSLAND CONFERENCE 10- 4202 - 140 -14 * ** -CKS RUBENSTEIN & ZIFF COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 149650 4272 * ** -CKS SEARS HUMIDIFIER BELTS 10- 4504 - 520 -52 750576 4222 * ** -CKS SOUTHDALE FORD PARTS AXLE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 221788 * ** -CKS SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO. BEER 50- 4630- 822 -82 SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO. BEER 50- 4630 - 842 -84 v AMOUNT 57.66 57.66 * 100.00 100.00 * 515.00 95.25 610.25 * 17.58 21.54 39.12 * 2,580.52 132.50 2,713.02 * 146.67 9.46 19.30 37.50 2.03 214.96 * 130.83 9.75 140.58 * 97.76 90.14 187.90 * 192.00 130.00 93.50 415.50 * 536.50 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION SOUTHTOWN MN FABRICS FABRIC JOHN SHEPARD STAR TRIBUNE STAR TRIBUNE STARK ELECTRONICS STARK ELECTRONICS STATE TREASURER STATE TREASURER SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP TARGET TARGET TESSMAN SEED & CHEM TESSMAN SEED & CHEM TESSMAN SEED & CHEM THE PRINT SHOP POLICE SERV BOND REFUNDING WANT ADS REPAIR PARTS CHIPS BLDG PERMIT BLDG PERMIT 11 -20 -89 PAGE 22 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4504 - 627 -62 169496 4036 10- 4100 - 430 -42 10- 1145 - 000 -00 10- 4212 - 510 -51 10- 4540 - 330 -30 50- 4540 - 861 -86 10- 3095 - 000 -00 10- 3113 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 4357 4196 * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 324537 11/08/89 * * * * ** 324550 11/08/89 * * * * ** 324554 11/13/89 324S54 11/13/89 * * * * ** 324556 11/13/89 324S56 11/13/89 * * * * ** PEDAL 324561 11/08/89 324561 11/08/89 * * * * ** 10- 4540 - 520 -52 324577 11/13/89 324S77 11/13/89 324S77 11/13/89 324S77 11/13/89 324S77 11/13/89 324578 11/13/89 324S78 11/13/89 * * * * ** 324T08 11/08/89 324T08 11/08/89 * * * * ** 324T11 11/08/89 324T11 11/14/89 324T11 11/13/89 * * * * ** 10- 4568 - 646 -64 324T2O 11/08/89 1 • 0 AMOUNT 57.66 57.66 * 100.00 100.00 * 515.00 95.25 610.25 * 17.58 21.54 39.12 * 2,580.52 132.50 2,713.02 * 146.67 9.46 19.30 37.50 2.03 214.96 * 130.83 9.75 140.58 * 97.76 90.14 187.90 * 192.00 130.00 93.50 415.50 * 536.50 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION SOUTHTOWN MN FABRICS FABRIC JOHN SHEPARD STAR TRIBUNE STAR TRIBUNE STARK ELECTRONICS STARK ELECTRONICS STATE TREASURER STATE TREASURER SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP TARGET TARGET TESSMAN SEED & CHEM TESSMAN SEED & CHEM TESSMAN SEED & CHEM THE PRINT SHOP POLICE SERV BOND REFUNDING WANT ADS REPAIR PARTS CHIPS BLDG PERMIT BLDG PERMIT 11 -20 -89 PAGE 22 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4504 - 627 -62 169496 4036 10- 4100 - 430 -42 10- 1145 - 000 -00 10- 4212 - 510 -51 10- 4540 - 330 -30 50- 4540 - 861 -86 10- 3095 - 000 -00 10- 3113 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 4357 4196 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 115922 GRILLE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 116015 STRUT ASSM 10- 4540 - 560 -56 116064 PIPE ASSM 10- 4540 - 560 -56 116252 PEDAL 10- 4540 - 560 -56 115903 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 3804 UNION 10- 4540 - 520 -52 3804 * ** -CKS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 627 -62 PHOTO SUPPLIES 12- 4508 - 434 -43 * ** -CKS GRASS SEED 10- 4568 - 646 -64 36887 4437 FERTILIZER 10- 4588 - 642 -62 38131 4386 FERTILIZER 30- 4558 - 783 -78 103089 4493 * ** -CKS NEWSLETTER 10- 4600 - 628 -62 11707 4141 ' • " �, VENDOR 1989 CITY OF EDINA NEWSLETTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 324T20 11/08/89 536.50 - 324T20 11/08/89 536.50 TRACY OIL GASOLINE 536.50 * * * * ** TWIN CITY HOME JUICE MIX 324T29 11/08/89 5,086.8Ot4,at2.99 UNIFORM UNLIMITED 324T29 11/08/89 14,012.99 UNIFORM UNLIMITED 19,099.79* ne nnr ne * 28,925.98 324T30 11/08/89 10,307.60 UNIVERSITY OF MN REGISTRATION 10,307.60 324T53 11/08/89 7,200.15 7,200.15 * * * * ** 324T66 11/08/89 34.22 34.22 ::T88 11/08/89 92.16 92.16 * * * * ** 324U08 11/08/89 2,395.80 324U08 11/08/89 31.45 324U08 11/08/89 42.00 324U08 11/13/89 34.75 2,504.00 * * * * * ** 324U14 11/13/89 105.87 105.87 * * * * * ** 324U20 11/08/89 75.00 324U20 11/08/89 75.00 150.00 * * * * * ** 324U30 11/08/89 40.50 40.50 * * * * * ** 324V30 11/08/89 200.89 M CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION THE PRINT SHOP NEWSLETTER THE PRINT SHOP NEWSLETTER THOMSEN - NYBECK LEGAL THOMSEN - NYBECK LEGAL THORPE DISTR. BEER TRACY OIL GASOLINE TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT CRAFT SUPPLIES TWIN CITY HOME JUICE MIX UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOWANCE UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOWANCE UNIFORM UNLIMITED GENERAL SUPPLIES UNIFORM UNLIMITED LAUNDRY /UNIFORMS UNITED ELECTRIC CORP WIRE UNIVERSITY OF MN REGISTRATION UNIVERSITY OF MN REGISTRATION US WEST PAGING TELEPHONE VANTAGE ELECTRIC REPAIR ELECTRIC 11 -20 -89 PAGE 23 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4600 - 628 -62 11707 4141 10- 4600 - 628 -62 11707 4141 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 220 -22 10- 4201 - 220 -22 50- 4630 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS 10- 4612 - 560 -56 T14140 4182 * ** -CKS 23- 4588- 611 -61 353711 4228 * ** -CKS 50- 4632 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS 10- 4266 - 420 -42 10- 4266 - 430 -42 10- 4504 - 430 -42 30- 4262- 782 -78 19258 2421 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 390 -30 4116 * ** -CKS 10- 4202 - 240 -24 10- 4206 - 260 -26 * ** -CKS 30- 4256 - 781 -78 4396 * ** -CKS 28- 4248 - 702 -70 10882 4129 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 324V30 11/08/89 * * * * ** 324V43 11/13/89 324V43 11/13/89 324V43 11/13/89 324V43 11/13/89 324V43 11/14/89 324V43 11/13/89 * * * * ** W.W. 324W08 11/13/89 324W08 11/13/89 324W08 11/13/89 324W08 11/13/89 324W08 11/13/89 324W09 11/14/89 324W09 11/14/89 * * * * ** 2208 324W11 11/13/89 324W11 11/13/89 * * * * ** 324W15 11/08/89 * * * * ** CASTERS 324W25 11/14/89 324W25 11/14/89 324W25 11/14/89 324W25 11/14/89 324W25 11/14/89 324W25 11/14/89 324W25 11/14/89 324W25 11/14/89 324W25 11/14/89 324W25 11/14/89 324W25 11/14/89 324W25 11/14/89 324W25 11/14/89 324W25 11/14/89 324W25 11/14/89 AMOUNT 103.87 304.76 2,287.00 750.00 250.00 147.00 4.67 15.01 3,453.68 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION VANTAGE ELECTRIC REPAIR ELECTRIC VERSATILE VEHICLE VERSATILE VEHICLE VERSATILE VEHICLE VERSATILE VEHICLE VERSATILE VEHICLE VERSATILE VEHICLE BEVERAGE CART LEASE GOLF CARTS LEASE GOLF CARTS RENTAL GOLF CARTS CART PARTS CONTRACT PARTS 11 -20 -89 PAGE 24 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 28- 4248 - 703 -70 10883 4345 27- 1340 - 000 -00 27- 4276- 665 -66 27- 4276 - 665 -66 27- 4276 - 665 -66 27- 4540 - 665 -66 27- 4540 - 665 -66 3999 4175 03982 2014 03982 4479 3337 4008 5343 4135 5345 4135 24.13 W.W. GRAINGER STAPLES 10- 4540 - 520 -52 4257 62.00 W.W. GRAINGER MOTORS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 4250 124.89 W.W. GRAINGER PULLEY /SHAFT 10- 4540 - 540 -54 4026 43.60 W.W. GRAINGER ADJ STOOL 10- 4540 - 540 -54 4268 240.87 495.49 A W.W. GRAINGER SAFETY LADDER 10- 4901 - 440 -44 2208 W.W. GRAINGER 8.83 W.W. GOETS6#- CASTERS 27- 4540 - 662 -66 7945 511.46* W.W• GOETSf�FI -- CASTERS 27- 4540 - 662 -66 7945 498.94 W. GORDON SMITH GASOLINE 27- 4612 - 664 -66 42408 4435 498.94 W. GORDON SMITH GASOLINE 27- 4612 - 664 -66 42407 4434 997.88 * 100.00 WALTER JOHNSON POLICE SERV 10- 4100 - 430 -42 100.00 * 426.76 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE 10- 4250 - 301 -30 83.14 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE 10- 4250 - 440 -44 91.30 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE 10- 4250 - 520 -52 426.76 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE 10- 4250 - 540 -54 115.00 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE 10- 4250 - 645 -64 52.25 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE 10- 4250 - 645 -64 27.71 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE 23- 4250 - 612 -61 128.00 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE 26- 4250 - 682 -68 347.54 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE 27- 4250 - 662 -66 76.75 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE 27- 4250 - 664 -66 46.67 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE 27- 4250 - 667 -66 166.40 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE 28- 4250 - 702 -70 166.40 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE 30- 4250 - 782 -78 61.00 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE 50- 4250- 841 -84 30.50 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE GARBAGE 50- 4250 - 861 -86 2,246.18 * * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS ** *-CKS * ** -CKS 11 -20 -89 PAGE 25 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 4208 - 600 -60 * ** -CKS 60- 1300 - 015 -20 3203 * ** -CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 23- 4600 - 611 -61 171 4048 23- 4600 - 611 -61 172 4049 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 560 -56 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 627 -62 101595 * ** -CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 82601 3369 10- 4620 - 560 -56 86501 3749 10- 4901 - 305 -30 83601 2579 10- 4901 - 305 -30 83901 2580 * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION * * * * ** 324W35 11/13/89 186.00 WEIGLE -SUE MILEAGE 186.00 * * * * * ** 324W49 11/08/89 1,230.70 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT CONSTRUCTION 1,230.70 * * * * * ** 324W52 11/08/89 100.00 WM WALSH POLICE SERV 100.00 * * * * * ** 324W63 11/13/89 278.50 WM BAIRD CO PRINTING 324W63 11/13/89 278.50 WM BAIRD CO PRINTING 557.00 * * * * * ** 324W66 11/13/89 54.94 WILLIAMS STEEL GRINDING OIL 54.94 * * * * * ** 324W71 11/14/89 1,704.75 WINFIELD DEVEL. RENT 1,704.75 * * * * * ** 324W92 11/08/89 100.00 WROBLESKI -HENRY POLICE SERV 100.00 * * * * * ** 324Z14 11/08/89 610.00 ZIEGLER INC HITCH HOOK 324Z14 11/08/89 2,700.00 ZIEGLER INC HYD LINER 324214 11/08/89 29,509.00 ZIEGLER INC 950 WHEEL LOADER 324Z14 11/08/89 88,963.00 ZIEGLER INC 936 WHEEL LOADER 121,782.00 * * * * ** , r -rr9g 28= er FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 115,362.00 FUND 11 TOTAL C.D.B.G. 90.14 FUND 12 TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS 11,307.68 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER 128.00 FUND 26 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUND 15,481.15 FUND 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND 2,165.87 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND 1,221.32 FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND 13,965.92 FUND 30 TOTAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 11 -20 -89 PAGE 25 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 4208 - 600 -60 * ** -CKS 60- 1300 - 015 -20 3203 * ** -CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 23- 4600 - 611 -61 171 4048 23- 4600 - 611 -61 172 4049 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 560 -56 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 627 -62 101595 * ** -CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 82601 3369 10- 4620 - 560 -56 86501 3749 10- 4901 - 305 -30 83601 2579 10- 4901 - 305 -30 83901 2580 * ** -CKS ri . . . 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -20 -89 PAGE 26 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 9,162.92 9i55.422- FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND 197.72 FUND*41 TOTAL STORM SEWER UTILITY 86,088.64 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 992,030.45 FUND 60 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 1,832,548.27* 1,841,4,6 ne TOTAL ri . . . s 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -31 -89 PAGE 1 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 275P32 11/07/89 24,394.80 P.E.R.A. PERA 10- 4145 - 510 -51 MANUAL 24,394.80 * __.... * * * * ** ** *-CKS 276E17 11/14/89 25.00 EASTSIDE BEV 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 25.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 276M14 11/07/89 11.00 MAUMA MEETING EXPENSES 10- 4206 - 140 -14 MANUAL 11.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 277731 11/07/89 3,750.00 OLYMPIC BALER BALER 50- 1340 - 000 -00 MANUAL 3,750.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 278775 11/07/89 126.50 SUSAN WOHLRABE SERVICES 10- 4105- 140 -14 MANUAL 126.50 * 278776 11/07/89 39,326.60 ANDRON INC PURCHASE LOTS 10 -4962- 500 -50 MANUAL 39,326.60 * 278777 11/07/89 573.40 RICHARD ANDRON WHITE OAK LOTS 10- 4962 - 500 -50 MANUAL 573.40 * 278778 11/07/89 80.93 RAY ELIOT CHEV REPAIRS 10 -4201- 500 -50 MANUAL 80.93 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 278876 11/07/89 79,570.00 BHK &R INSURANCE 10- 4260 - 510 -51 MANUAL 278B76 11/07/89 7,957.00 BHK &R INSURANCE 10- 4260 - 510 -51 MANUAL 278B76 11/07/89 79,570.00- BHK &R INSURANCE 10- 4260 - 510 -51 MANUAL 7,957.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 278H23 11/07/89 35,211.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO INSURANCE 10- 4260 - 510 -51 MANUAL 35,211.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 278H34 11/07/89 611.60 HENN CTY TREAS WHITE OAK LOTS 10- 4962- 500-50 MANUAL 611.60 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 278H83 11/07/89 70,000.00 HRA TRANSFER 10- 1145 - 000 -00 MANUAL 70,000.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO..DATE 283864 11/14/89 283864 11/14/89 * * * * ** 283EII 283E11 283E11 283E11 283E11 283E11 283E11 283E11 283EII 283EII * * * * ** 283E26 283E26 283E26 283E26 283E26 283E26 283E26 283E26 283E26 283E26 283E26 283E26 283E26 283E26 283E26 283E26 283E26 283E26 283E26 283E26 283E26 283E26 283E26 283E26 283E26 283E26 283E26 283E26 283E26 AMOUNT CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 1.38- BRW ENTERPRISES 92.00 BRW ENTERPRISES 90.62 * 11/14/89 5.74- EAGLE WINE 11/14/89 7.96- EAGLE WINE 11/14/89 6.41- EAGLE WINE 11/14/89 24.08- EAGLE WINE 11/14/89 397.95 EAGLE WINE 11/14/89 286.88 EAGLE WINE 11/14/89 320.56 EAGLE WINE 11/14/89 1,204.22 EAGLE WINE 11/07/89 104.19 EAGLE WINE 11/07/89 18.58 EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 2,288.19 50- 3710 - 842 -84 11/14/89 .62- ED PHILLIPS 11/14/89 18.25- ED PHILLIPS 11/14/89 3.99- ED PHILLIPS 11/14/89 5.78- ED PHILLIPS 11/14/89 4.58- ED PHILLIPS 11/14/89 5.54- ED PHILLIPS 11/14/89 3.96- ED PHILLIPS 11/14/89 9.43- ED PHILLIPS 11/14/89 22.92- ED PHILLIPS 11/14/89 2.51- ED PHILLIPS 11/14/89 7.58- ED PHILLIPS 11/14/89 3.94- ED PHILLIPS 11/14/89 15.05- ED PHILLIPS 11/14/89 2.55- ED PHILLIPS 11/14/89 199.58 ED PHILLIPS 11/14/89 912.80 ED PHILLIPS 11/14/89 1,146.41 ED PHILLIPS 11/14/89 752.81 ED PHILLIPS 11/14/89 458.23 ED PHILLIPS 11/14/89 578.41 ED PHILLIPS 11/14/89 62.00 ED PHILLIPS 11/14/89 396.80 ED PHILLIPS 11/14/89 554.28 ED PHILLIPS 11/14/89 943.32 ED PHILLIPS 11/14/89 251.90 ED PHILLIPS 11/14/89 255.99 ED PHILLIPS 11/14/89 758.73 ED PHILLIPS 11/14/89 394.85 ED PHILLIPS 11/07/89 16.95 ED PHILLIPS 7,576.36 * * * * ** 283G82 11/14/89 24.62- GRIGGS COOPER 10 -31 -89 PAGE 2 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842-84 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 MANUAL MIX 50 -4632- 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL . 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL BEER 50- 4630 - 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -31 -89 PAGE 3 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION. ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 283G82 11/14/89 38.73- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL 283G82 11/14/89 82.98- GRIGGS•COOPER 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL 283G82 11/14/89 108.85- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 283G82 11/14/89 3.87- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 283G82 11/14/89 3.04- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 283G82 11/14/89 84.85- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 283G82 11/14/89 2.49- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 283G82 11/14/89 7.74- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 283G82 11/14/89 31.05- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 283G82 11/14/89 151.81 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 283G82 11/14/89 387.08 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 283G82 11/14/89 124.36 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 283G82 11/14/89 4,242.66 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 283G82 11/14/89 1,552.33 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 283G82 11/14/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 283G82 11/14/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 283G82 11/14/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 283G82 11/14/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 283682 11/14/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 6,070.02 + * * * -CKS 283J62 11/14/89 8.05- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 283J62 11/14/89 8.05- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 283J62 11/14/89 8.05 JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 283J62 11/14/89 21.87- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 283J62 11/14/89 95.64- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 283J62 11/14/89 11.62- JOHNSON WINE 50-3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 283J62 11/14/89 11.95- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 283J62 11/14/89 5.98- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 283J62 11/14/89 7.11- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 283J62 11/14/89 29.80- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 283J62 11/14/89 1,093.49 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 283J62 11/14/89 4.80 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 283J62 11/14/89 26.00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 283J62 11/14/89 4,782.93 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 283J62 11/14/89 1,489.75 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 283J62 11/14/89 5.20 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 283J62 11/14/89 10.00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 283J62 11/14/89 902.60- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 283J62 11/14/89 6.66- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 283'J62 11/14/89 20.93- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 283J62 11/14/89 10.00- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 283J62 11/14/89 802.60 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 283J62 11/14/89 10.00 JOHNSON WINE 50•- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 283J62 11/14/89 902.60 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 283J62 11/14/89 1,160.52 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 283J62 11/14/89 11.20 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 283J62 11/14/89 1,194.03 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 283J62 11/14/89 22.80 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 283J62 11/14/89 597.73 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 283J62 11/14/89 708.39 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 283J62 11/14/89 14.00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 283J62 11/14/89 3.60 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL r r 1 r 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE kRkkkk 283P20 283P20 *kkkkk 283P82 283P82 283P82 283P82 283P82 283P82 283P82 *kkkkk 283Q16 283Q16 283Q16 283Q16 283Q16 283Q16 283Q16 283Q16 283Q16 283Q16 283Q16 283Q16 283Q16 283Q16 283Q16 283Q16 283Q16 283Q16 283Q16 283Q16 kkkkkk 283T49 283T49 283T49 kkkkkk 284700 Rkkkkk CHECK REGISTER 10 -31 -89 PAGE 4 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 11,707.43 * ** -CKS 11/14/89 6.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 11/14/89 201.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 207.00 * * ** -CKS 11/14/89 4.30- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710-822 -82 MANUAL 11/14/89 5.51- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 11/14/89 11.88- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 11/14/89 193.13 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 11/07/89 21.95 PRIOR WINE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 11/14/89 275.56 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 11/14/89 593.87 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 1,062.82 kk* -CKS 11/14/89 12.93- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 11/14/89 4.84- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 11/14/89 .61- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 11/14/89 23.06- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 11/14/89 28.05- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 11/14/89 2.48- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 11/14/89 .04 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 11/14/89 1.43- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 11/14/89 11.41- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 11/14/89 12.69- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 11/14/89 646.91 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 11/14/89 61.25 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 11/14/89 1,402.45 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 11/14/89 634.92 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 11/14/89 481.60 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 11/14/89 2,297.85 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 11/14/89 247.00 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 11/14/89 1,138.40 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 11/14/89 142.55 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 11/14/89 4.49- QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 6,950.98 * ** -CKS 11/14/89 121.79 TOW DISTRIBUTING 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 11/14/89 57.54 TOW DISTRIBUTING 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 11/14/89 103.90 TOW DISTRIBUTING 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 283.23 * * ** -CKS 11/07/89 206.25 YELLOW FREIGHT INC SHIPPING 10- 4504 - 646 -64 MANUAL 206.25 * ** -CKS to 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 284673 11/07/89 284673 11/07/89 284673 11/07/89 284673 11/07/89 284673 11/07/89 284673 11/07/89 284673 11/07/89 284673 11/07/89 284673 11/07/89 284B73 11/07/89 284B73 11/07/89 284673 11/07/89 284673 11/07/89 284673 11/07/89 * * * * ** PETTY 285C33 11/07/89 285C33 11/07/89 * * * * ** POSTAGE 286A82 11/07/89 286A82 11/07/89 286A82 11/07/89 286A82 11/07/89 286A82 11/07/89 286A82 11/07/89 286A83 11/07/89 286A84 11/07/89 * * * * ** PETTY 286P70 11/07/89 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 288703 11/07/89 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 288F14 11/07/89 288F14 11/07/89 * * * * ** AMOUNT 101.00 24.00 368.88 38.00 29.95 18.00 3.64 51.00 25.00 24.52 6.85 10.90 14.00 23.29 739.03 117,000.00 117,000.00- .00 7.10 3.32 27.04 11.83 5.55 2.68 57.52 17.29 17.29 * 12.75 12.75 * 480.00 480.00 395.00 395.00 13,725.38 490.40 14,215.78 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION GC PETTY CASH SALARIES GC PETTY CASH SALAARIES GC PETTY CASH SALARIES GC PETTY CASH SCHOOL GC PETTY CASH DUES GC PETTY CASH REPAIRS GC PETTY CASH REPAIRS GC PETTY CASH TELEPHONE GC PETTY CASH POSTAGE GC PETTY CASH OFFICE SUPPLIES GC PETTY CASH REPAIR PARTS GC PETTY CASH REPAIR PARTS GC PETTY CASH PLANTINGS GC PETTY CASH CONCESSIONS CITY OF EDINA TRANSFER CITY OF EDINA TRANSFER AT &T AT &T AT &T AT &T AT &T AT &T AT &T AT &T POSTMASTER VAN METER & ASSO FIDELITY BANK FIDELITY BANK TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE POSTAGE SCHOOL FICA MEDICARE 10 -31 -89 PAGE 5 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 27- 4120 - 663 -66 MANUAL 27- 4120 - 664 -66 MANUAL 27- 4120 - 666 -66 MANUAL 27- 4202 - 661 -66 MANUAL 27- 4204 - 661 -66 MANUAL 27- 4248 - 662 -66 MANUAL 27- 4248 - 664 -66 MANUAL 27- 4256 - 664 -66 MANUAL 27- 4290 - 661 -66 MANUAL 27- 4516 - 661 -66 MANUAL 27- 4540 - 664 -66 MANUAL 27- 4540 - 667 -66 MANUAL 27- 4560-664 -66 MANUAL 27- 4624 - 663 -66 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL 23- 4256 - 612 -61 MANUAL 27- 4256 - 662 -66 MANUAL 27- 4256 - 664 -66 MANUAL 40- 4256 - 803 -80 MANUAL 50- 4256 - 861 -86 MANUAL 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4290 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4202 - 420 -42 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4149 - 510 -51 MANUAL 10- 4162 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS � r , 1989 CITY OF EDINA . CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 288P32 11/07/89 23,615.07 P.E.R.A. PERA 23,615.07 * * * * * ** 288P70 11/07/89 165.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 165.00 * * * * * ** 289701 11/07/89 173,125.62 PITT -DES MOINES CONSTRUCTION 173,125.62 * 289702 11/07/89 850.00 RICHARD G LARSON SERVICES 850.00 * * * * * ** 290E11 11/14/89 11.17- EAGLE WINE 290E11 11/14/89 20.56- EAGLE WINE 290E11 11/14/89 1.59- EAGLE WINE 290E11 11/14/89 14.47- EAGLE WINE 290E11 11/14/89 558.46 EAGLE WINE 290E11 11/14/89 1,028.15 EAGLE WINE 290E11 11/14/89 723.39 EAGLE WINE 290EII 11/14/89 79.59 EAGLE WINE 290EII 11/07/89 71.47 EAGLE WINE MIX 290E11 11/07/89 188.68 EAGLE WINE MIX 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 2,601.95 MANUAL * * * * ** MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 290E26 11/14/89 4.24 ED PHILLIPS 290E26 11/14/89 3.09- ED PHILLIPS 290E26 11/14/89 11.58- ED PHILLIPS 290E26 11/14/89 11.91- ED PHILLIPS 290E26 11/14/89 4.24- ED PHILLIPS 290E26 11/14/89 4.24- ED PHILLIPS 290E26 11/14/89 6.36- ED PHILLIPS 290E26 11/14/89 5.27- ED PHILLIPS 290E26 11/14/89 6.96- ED PHILLIPS 290E26 11/14/89 6.36 ED PHILLIPS 290E26 11/14/89 5.26- ED PHILLIPS 290E26 11/14/89 27.04- ED PHILLIPS 290E26 11/14/89 6.36- ED PHILLIPS 290E26 11/14/89 15.26- ED PHILLIPS 290E26 11/14/89 14.54- ED PHILLIPS 290E26 11/14/89 2.96- ED PHILLIPS 290E26 11/14/89 4.71- ED PHILLIPS 290E26 11/14/89 9.00- ED PHILLIPS 290E26 11/14/89 .34- ED PHILLIPS 290E26 11/14/89 2.90- ED PHILLIPS 290E26 11/14/89 63.92- ED PHILLIPS 290E26 11/14/89 595.55 ED PHILLIPS 10 -31 -89 PAGE 6 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4145 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4290 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 60- 2040 - 000 -00 MANUAL 30- 4201 - 781 -78 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4632 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4632 - 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710-842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -31 -89 PAGE 7 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 290E26 11/14/89 263.57 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 290E26 11/14/89 1,352.37 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 290E26 11/14/89 235.65 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 290E26 11/14/89 1,158.11 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 290E26 11/14/89 309.29 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 29OE26 11/14/89 424.20 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 290E26 11/14/89 424.20 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 290E26 11/14/89 424.20- ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 29OE26 11/14/89 636.30 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 29OE26 11/14/89 526.95 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 290E26 11/14/89 636.30- ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 290E26 11/14/89 1,526.13 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 290E26 11/14/89 696.64 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 29OE26 11/14/89 636.30 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 29OE26 11/14/89 900.18 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 29OE26 11/14/89 296.94 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 29OE26 11/14/89 1,454.22 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 29OE26 11/14/89 3,196.42 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 29OE26 11/14/89 290.56 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 290E26 11/14/89 34.24 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 13,701.98 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 29OG82 11/14/89 67.76- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL 290682 11/14/89 18.99- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 29OG82 11/14/89 63.02- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 290682 11/14/89 11.53- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 29OG82 11/14/89 112.84- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 290682 11/14/89 3.87- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 29OG82 11/14/89 3,150.81 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 290G82 11/14/89 949.81 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 290G82 11/14/89 576.48 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 29OG82 11/14/89 5,642.00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 290G82 11/14/89 193.54 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 290G82 11/14/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 10,234.63 290H83 11/07/89 80,000.00 HRA TRANSFER 10- 1145 - 000 -00 MANUAL 80,000.00 " * * * * ** * ** -CKS 290J62 11/14/89 50.48- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 290J62 11/14/89 10.86- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 29OJ62 11/14/89 1.48- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 290J62 11/14/89 39.68- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 290J62 11/14/89 6.44- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 290J62 11/14/89 6.44- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 290J62 11/14/89 14.32- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 290J62 11/14/89 6.44 JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 290J62 11/14/89 12.77- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 290J62 11/14/89 70.19- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 290J62 11/14/89 11.80 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 290J62 11/14/89 2,524.46 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 1989 CITY OF EDINA 290J62 11/14/89 290J62 11/14/89 290J62 11/14/89 290J62 11/14/89 290J62 11/14/89 290J62 11/14/89 290J62 11/14/89 290J62 11/14/89 290J62 11/14/89 290J62 11/14/89 290J62 11/14/89 290J62 11/14/89 290J62 11/14/89 290J62 11/14/89 290J62 11/14/89 290J62 11/14/89 290J62 11/14/89 290J62 11/14/89 290J62 11/14/89 290J62 11/14/89 kkkkkk AMOUNT 1,984.43 7.60 16.93 3,508.69 17.40- 1,080.85 16.00 1.20 12.00 12.00 1,433.44 12.00 - 640.98- 12.00 640.98 7.50- 640.98 147.75 20.00 1,270.66 12,457.67 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE 290P20 11/14/89 88.90 PAUSTIS & SONS 290P20 11/14/89 33.50 PAUSTIS & SONS 290P20 11/14/89 3.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 125.40 kkkkkk 290P82 11/14/89 5.12- PRIOR WINE 290P82 11/14/89 .79- PRIOR WINE 290P82 11/14/89 .79- PRIOR WINE 290P82 11/14/89 14.00- PRIOR WINE 290P82 11/14/89 10.05- PRIOR WINE 290P82 11/07/89 19.95 PRIOR WINE 290P82 11/14/89 236.14 PRIOR WINE 290P82 11/14/89 39.29 PRIOR WINE 290P82 11/14/89 39.29 PRIOR WINE 290P82 11/14/89 700.20 PRIOR WINE 290P82 11/14/89 502.74 PRIOR WINE . 290P82 11/07/89 36.21 PRIOR WINE 1,543.07 ITEM DESCRIPTION. WINE MIX ACCOUNT NO. INV 50- 4626 - 842 -84 50- 4626 - 842 -84 50- 4626 - 862 -86 50- 4626 - 862 -86 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 862 -86 50- 4628 - 862 -86 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50- 4628- 842 -84 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 862 -86 50- 4632 - 822 -82 10 -31 -89 PAGE 8 # P.O. # MESSAGE MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL kkkkkk k** -CKS 290Q16 11/14/89 19.48- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 290Q16 11/14/89 5.94- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 290Q16 11/14/89 .34- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 290Q16 11/14/89 .34 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 290Q16 11/14/89 96.64- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 290Q16 11/14/89 .75 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 290Q16 11/14/89 3.85- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 290Q16 11/14/89 9.99- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL . to 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 290Q16 11/14/89 6.58- QUALITY WINE 290Q16 11/14/89 2.58- QUALITY WINE 29OQ16 11/14/89 91.08- QUALITY WINE 290Q16 11/14/89 974.09 QUALITY WINE 290Q16 11/14/89 4,831.80 QUALITY WINE 290Q16 11/14/89 4,553.78 QUALITY WINE 290Q16 11/14/89 34.50 QUALITY WINE 290Q16 11/14/89 593.05 QUALITY WINE 29OQ16 11/14/89 994.25 QUALITY WINE 29OQ16 11/14/89 74.95- QUALITY WINE 29OQ16 11/14/89 34.70- QUALITY WINE 29OQ16 11/14/89 383.10 QUALITY WINE 290Q16 11/14/89 656.00 QUALITY WINE 29OQ16 11/14/89 258.35 QUALITY WINE 293U27 11/07/89 12,933.88 * US WEST * * * * ** TELEPHONE 293U27 11/07/89 53.72 293731 11/07/89 281.25 SANDRA K ANDERSON REIMBURSEMENT 293U27 11/07/89 281.25 * US WEST * * * * ** 293737 11/07/89 18.75 JOAN WATERSTREET REIMBURSEMENT 18.75 * * * * * ** 293760 11/07/89 60.00 1ST NATL ANOKA REGISTRATION FEE MANUAL 50- 4626 - 822 -82 60.00 * 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL * * * * ** MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 293H83 11/07/89 150,000.00 HRA MANUAL TRANSFER MANUAL 50-4628- 862 -86 150,000.00 * * ** -CKS 10- 4206 - 500 -50 MANUAL * * * * ** * ** -CKS 10- 4206 - 500 -50 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10 -4201- 500 -50 293U27 11/07/89 449.37 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 293U27 11/07/89 145.13 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 293U27 11/07/89 22.79 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 293U27 11/07/89 45.49 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 293U27 11/07/89 34.08 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 293U27 11/07/89 326.22 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 293U27 11/07/89 53.72 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 293U27 11/07/89 127.93 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 293U27 11/07/89 339.13 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 293U27 11/07/89 42.96 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 293U27 11/07/89 245.16 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 293U27 11/07/89 414.85 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 293U27 11/07/89 16.06 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 293U27 11/07/89 16.06 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 293U27 11/07/89 16.06 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 2,295.01 10 -31 -89 PAGE 9 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50-4628- 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4206 - 500 -50 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4206 - 500 -50 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10 -4201- 500 -50 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 1145- 000 -00 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4256- 510 -51 MANUAL 10 -4256- 622 -62 MANUAL 10- 4256- 628 -62 MANUAL 10- 4256- 646 -64 MANUAL 23- 4256 - 612 -61 MANUAL 27- 4256 - 662 -66 MANUAL 27- 4256- 664 -66 MANUAL 27- 4256 - 667 -66 MANUAL 28 -4256- 702 -70 MANUAL 29- 4256- 722 -72 MANUAL 30- 4256 - 782 -78 MANUAL 40- 4256 - 803 -80 MANUAL 50- 4256 - 821 -82 MANUAL 50- 4256 - 841 -84 MANUAL 50- 4256 - 861 -86 MANUAL I I e * ** -CKS 1 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR CHECK REGISTER 10 -31 -89 PAGE 10 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 297733 11/07/89 875.00 MICHELLE BERGMANN SERVICES 30- 4201 - 781 -78 875.00 * * * * ** 297E11 11/14/89 8.29- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 297EII 11/14/89 9.23- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 297EII 11/14/89 19.12- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 297E11 11/14/89 414.38 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 297E11 11/14/89 461.44 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 297E11 11/14/89 956.09 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 297E11 11/07/89 38.17 EAGLE WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 822 -82 297EII 11/07/89 23.11 EAGLE WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 862 -86 1,856.55 * * * * ** 297E26 11/14/89 3.92- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 297E26 11/14/89 13.12- ED PHILLIPS 50-3710- 822 -82 297E26 11/14/89 4.74- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 297E26 11/14/89 8.13- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 297E26 11/14/89 5.20- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 297E26 11/14/89 12.20- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 297E26 11/14/89 1.21- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 297E26 11/14/89 8.39- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 297E26 11/14/89 3.45- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 297E26 11/14/89 2.28- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 842 -84 297E26 11/14/89 7.99- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 297E26 11/14/89 2.75- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 297E26 11/14/89 56.69- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 297E26 11/14/89 11.85- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 297E26 11/14/89 2.53- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 297E26 11/14/89 2.32- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 297E26 11/14/89 3.06- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 297E26 11/14/89 8.55- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 297E26 11/14/89 99.40- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 297E26 11/14/89 3.54- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 297E26 11/14/89 1.79- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 297E26 11/14/89 196.26 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 822 -82 297E26 11/14/89 656.35 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 822 -82 297E26 11/14/89 419.57 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 842 -84 297E26 11/14/89 2,834.88 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 842 -84 297E26 11/14/89 172.52 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 842 -84 297E26 11/14/89 89.90 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 862 -86 297E26 11/14/89 4,970.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 862 -86 297E26 11/14/89 153.06 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 862 -86 297E26 11/14/89 177.40 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 862 -86 297E26 11/14/89 813.44 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 297E26 11/14/89 520.54 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 297E26 11/14/89 474.50 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 297E26 11/14/89 121.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 297E26 11/14/89 1,220.99 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 297E26 11/14/89 799.05 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 297E26 11/14/89 228.79 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL w 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV 297E26 11/14/89 275.70 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 297E26 11/14/89 253.78 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 297E26 11/14/89 232.75 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 297E26 11/14/89 1,185.30 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 297E26 11/14/89 855.54 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 297E26 11/07/89 51.05 ED PHILLIPS BEER 50- 4630 - 862 -86 297E26 11/07/89 18.95 ED PHILLIPS BEER 50- 4630 - 862 -86 297E26 11/07/89 76.23 ED PHILLIPS MIX 50- 4632 - 862 -86 16,534.44 * * * * ** 297G82 11/14/89 13.80- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 822 -82 297G82 11/14/89 15.52- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 822 -82 297G82 11/14/89 156.18- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 822 -82 297G82 11/14/89 74.42- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 822 -82 297G82 11/14/89 27.87- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 842 -84 297G82 11/14/89 55.06- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 842 -84 297G82 11/14/89 8.76- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 862 -86 297G82 11/14/89 70.38- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 862 -86 297G82 11/14/89 39.78- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 297G82 11/14/89 5.15- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 297G82 11/14/89 47.85- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 842 -84 297G82 11/14/89 8.01- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 297G82 11/14/89 86.41- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 297G82 11/14/89 257.32 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 822 -82 297G82 11/14/89 1,989.11 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 822 -82 297G82 11/14/89 2,392.34 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 297G82 11/14/89 4,320.60 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 862 -86 297G82 11/14/89 400.25 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 862 -86 297G82 11/14/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628- 822 -82 297G82 11/14/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 822 -82 297G82 11/14/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 822 -82 297G82 11/14/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 822 -82 297G82 11/14/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 842 -84 297G82 11/14/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 842 -84 297G82 11/14/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 862 -86 297G82 11/14/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 862 -86 8,750.43 R *1fk ** 297J62 11/14/89 2.00- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3700 - 822 -82 297J62 11/14/89 1.00- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3700 - 842 -84 297J62 11/14/89 .50- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3700 - 862 -86 297J62 11/14/89 6.82- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 297J62 11/14/89 31.91- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 297J62 11/14/89 7.36- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 297J62 11/14/89 14.49- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 297J62 11/14/89 14.11- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 297J62 11/14/89 56.51- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 297J62 11/14/89 29.92- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 297J62 11/14/89 6.76- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 297J62 11/14/89 10.11- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 2 / 1, 275.81 1,267-51 4OWSON -W -ENE- .50- 4626- 8- 22 --8-2- 10 -31 -89 PAGE 11 # P.O. # MESSAGE � i 1 MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL- 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR 297J62 11/14/89 8.30 JOHNSON WINE 297J62 11/14/89 21.00 JOHNSON WINE 497462 11j14/89 2,825.75 -2—,se4-75 4eHNS -O"INE- " 297J62 11/14/89 11.60 JOHNSON WINE - 297a62 11�14/ 1,495.71 'r- 484-=1 4OH -NseN -WINE- 297J62 11/14/89_ 00 JOHNSON WINE 11/07/89 1;002.x35 PRIOR WINE WINE W 29T 79 62 11/14%89 7994.9S 3 JOHNSON NE 297J62 11/14/89 7.20 JOHNSON WINE 297J62 11/14/89 8.30 JOHNSON WINE —29;j62 -1 i�/14/.8 -9- 1,411.83 i,999.8a - PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 297J62 11/14/89 9.20 JOHNSON WINE 297J62 11/14/89 21.00 JOHNSON WINE 297J62 11/14/89 .00 JOHNSON WINE 297J62 11/14/89 1,448.55 JOHNSON WINE 297J62 11/14/89 .00 JOHNSON WINE 297J62 11/14/89 4.40 JOHNSON WINE 297J62 11/14/89 675.35 JOHNSON WINE -297 -i 4-71,011.29 999-69 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 297J62 11/14/89 11.60 JOHNSON WINE 297Q16 11/14/89 729.58 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 11,802.39-11 * * * * ** ITEM,DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV 50- 4626 - 822 -82 50- 4626 - 842 -84 5 0-*6.2 6 -8-42- 8.4 50- 4626 - 862 -86 -50- 4626=862- -86- 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 862 -86 50- 4628 - 862 -86 50- 4628 - 862 -86 50- 4628 - 862 -86 297P20 11/14/89 107.25 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 297P20 11/14/89 3.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 297P20 11/14/89 6.40 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 297P20 11/14/89 399.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 515.65 * 11/07/89 19.95 PRIOR WINE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 * * * * ** 297P82 11/14/89 3.15- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 297P82 11/14/89 4.70- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 297P82 11/14/89 8.48- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 297P82 11/14/89 1.19- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 297P82 11/14/89 5.85- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 297P82 11/14/89 137.62 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 297P82 11/07/89 19.95 PRIOR WINE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 297P82 11/14/89 235.11 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 297P82 11/14/89 423.79 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 297P82 11/14/89 59.58 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 297P82 11/14/89 292.43 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 1,145.11 * * * * ** 297Q16 11/14/89 114.97- QUALITY WINE 50- 3700 - 842 -84 297Q16 11/14/89 5.63- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 297Q16 11/14/89 25.55- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 297Q16 11/14/89 44.71- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 297Q16 11/14/89 12.23- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 297Q16 11/14/89 2.96- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 297Q16 11/14/89 .05 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 297Q16 11/14/89 7.57- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 E 10 -31 -89 PAGE 12 # P.O. # MESSAGE v 40 • MANUAL MANUAL -MANUAL - MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 297Q16 11/14/89 297Q16 11/14/89 297Q16 11/14/89 297Q16 11/14/89 297Q16 11/14/89 297Q16 11/14/89 297Q16 11/14/89 297Q16 11/14/89 297Q16 11/14/89 297Q16 11/14/89 297Q16 11/14/89 297Q16 11/14/89 297Q16 11/14/89 297Q16 11/14/89 * * * * ** 297T49 11/14/89 * * * * ** 299C47 11/07/89 * * * * ** 299P70 11/07/89 * * * * ** 30OC33 11/07/89 30OC33 11/07/89 * * * * ** 300F14 11/07/89 300F14 11/07/89 * * * * ** 304834 11/14/89 304834 11/14/89 304E11 11/14/89 304E11 11/14/89 304E11 11/14/89 304E11 11/14/89 AMOUNT 63.32 - 1.05- .92- 1,276.87 2,234.94 3,164.65 562.40 .00 295.36 1,218.20 4.55- 754.35 91.00 105.60 9,419.96 46.05 46.05 433.80 433.80 8.75 8.75 95,000.00 95,000.00- .00 13,402.40 474.31 13,876.71 1.18- 78.60 77.42 11.58 - 20.56- 24.49- 579.16 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE TOW DISTRIBUTING COMM LIFE INS CO POSTMASTER CITY OF EDINA CITY OF EDINA FIDELITY BANK FIDELITY BANK BRW ENTERPRISES BRW ENTERPRISES EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE LIFE INSURANCE POSTAGE PAYROLL TRANSFER PAYROLL TRANSFER FICA MEDICARE ;J 10 -31 -89 PAGE 13 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4157 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4290- 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4149 - 510 -51 MANUAL 10- 4162 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 0 * *. ** * ** -CKS 304E26 11/14/89 2.82- ED PHILLIPS r MANUAL � 1989 CITY OF EDINA ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 CHECK REGISTER 304E26 10 -31 -89 PAGE 14 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 304EII 11/14/89 1,027.85 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 304EII 11/14/89 1,224.53 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 304E11 11/07/89 45.48 EAGLE WINE MIX 50- 4632- 822 -82 MANUAL 304E11 11/07/89 90.48 EAGLE WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 MANUAL 304E26 11/14/89 2,910.87 ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 304E26 * *. ** * ** -CKS 304E26 11/14/89 2.82- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 304E26 11/14/89 2.30- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 304E26 11/14/89 7.03- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 304E26 11/14/89 6.13- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 304E26 11/14/89 3.41- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 304E26 11/14/89 5.58- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 304E26 11/14/89 1.31- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 304E26 11/14/89 16.44- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 304E26 11/14/89 6.00- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 304E26 11/14/89 7.71- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 304E26 11/14/89 11.16- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 304E26 11/14/89 1.57- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 304E26 11/14/89 3.08- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 304E26 11/14/89 1.20- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 304E26 11/14/89 170.86 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 304E26 11/14/89 306.84 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 304E26 11/14/89 65.92 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 304E26 11/14/89 822.14 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 304E26 11/14/89 78.67 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 304E26 11/14/89 282.06 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 304E26 11/14/89 703.90 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 304E26 11/14/89 230.39 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 304E26 11/14/89 600.13 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 304E26 11/14/89 558.63 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 304E26 11/14/89 1,116.30 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 304E26 11/14/89 308.95 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 304E26 11/14/89 120.39 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 304E26 11/14/89 771.21 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 304E26 11/07/89 260.95- ED PHILLIPS BEER 50- 4630 - 841 -84 MANUAL 304E26 11/07/89 260.95 ED PHILLIPS BEER 50- 4630 - 841 -84 MANUAL 304E26 11/07/89 260.95 ED PHILLIPS BEER 50- 4630- 842 -84 MANUAL 6,321.60 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 304G82 11/14/89 58.40- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL 304G82 11/14/89 43.40- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL 304G82 11/14/89 6.90- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 304G82 11/14/89 86.70- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 304G82 11/14/89 36.86- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 304G82 11/14/89 29.84- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 304G82 11/14/89 1.56- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 304G82 11/14/89 67.19- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 304G82 11/14/89 143.04- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 304G82 11/14/89 1,843.15 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 304G82 11/14/89 78.09 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 304G82 11/14/89 1,491.80 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL .10 �w 40 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV 304G82 11/14/89 3,359.38 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 862 -86 304G82 11/14/89 7,152.00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 862-86 304G82 11/14/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 822 -82 304G82 11/14/89 4.29- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 842 -84 304682 11/14/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628- 842 -84 304G82 11/14/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 862 -86 304G82 11/14/89 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 862 -86 13,446.24 * * * * * ** 304G86 11/07/89 11,570.95 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 10- 4156 - 510 -51 11,570.95 * * * * * ** 304J62 11/14/89 5.29- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 304J62 11/14/89 3.62- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 304J62 11/14/89 4.87- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 304J62 11/14/89 45.07- JOHNSON WINE - 50- 3710 - 822 -82 304J62 11/14/89 7.41- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 304J62 11/14/89 12.93- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 304J62 11/14/89 128.51- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 304J62 11/14/89 6.77- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 304J62 11/14/89 9.65- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 304J62 11/14/89 137.82- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 304J62 11/14/89 2.00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 304J62 11/14/89 2,253.80 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 304J62 11/14/89 10.27 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 304J62 11/14/89 264.30 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 304J62 11/14/89 28.87 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 304J62 11/14/89 6,425.56 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 304J62 11/14/89 1.32- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 304J62 11/14/89 32.80 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 304J62 11/14/89 6,890.66 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 304J62 11/14/89 359.78 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 304J62 11/14/89 3.60 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 304J62 11/14/89 3.80- JOHNSON WINE - 50- 4628 - 822 -82 304J62 11/14/89 7.20 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 304J62 11/14/89 488.05 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 304J62 11/14/89 13.60 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 304J62 11/14/89 9.86- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 304J62 11/14/89 738.50 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 304J62 11/14/89 10.80 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 304J62 11/14/89 1,291.57 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 304J62 11/14/89 5.36- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 304J62 11/14/89 676.81 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 304J62 11/14/89 964.38 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 304J62 11/14/89 5.20 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 304J62 11/14/89 18.00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 20,103.47 * * * * ** 304M24 11/07/89 15,759.70 MED CENTERS HOSP PREM 10- 4156 - 510 -51 10 -31 -89 PAGE 15 # P.O. # MESSAGE MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE * * * * ** 30012 11/07/89 * * * * ** 304P32 11/07/89 * * * * ** 304P42 11/07/89 * * * * ** 304P82 11/14/89 304P82 11/14/89 304P82 11/14/89 304P82 11/14/89 304P82 11/14/89 304P82 11/14/89 304P82 11/14/89 304P82 11/14/89 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 304Q16 11/14/89 304Q16 11/14/89 304Q16 11/14/89 304Q16 11/14/89 304Q16 11/14/89 304Q16 11/14/89 304Q16 11/14/89 304Q16 11/14/89 304Q16 11/14/89 304Q16 11/14/89 304Q16 11/14/89 304Q16 11/14/89 304Q16 11/14/89 304Q16 11/14/89 304Q16 11/14/89 304Q16 11/14/89 304Q16 11/14/89 304Q16 11/14/89 * * * * ** AMOUNT 15,759.70 * 2,251.95 2,251.95 * 23,770.59 23,770.59 * 19,244.00 19,244.00 * 4.34 - .79- 8.28- 4.52- 217.04 39.29 413.97 226.01 878.38 1.01 - 5.35- 8.69- 44.91- 2.83- 13.40- 1.80- 11.36- 59.41- 268.01 2,245.05 2,970.78 101.65 865.53 282.10 1,335.29 179.90 1,133.28 9,232.83 535,346.30 37.40 1,285.77 y CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE INSURANCE P.E.R.A. PHP PRIOR WINE PRIOR WINE PRIOR WINE PRIOR WINE PRIOR WINE PRIOR WINE PRIOR WINE PRIOR WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE FUND 10 TOTAL FUND 23 TOTAL FUND 27 TOTAL ' 4 PERA INSURANCE GENERAL FUND ART CENTER GOLF COURSE FUND J 10 -31 -89 PAGE 16 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10-4158- 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4145 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4156- 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 822-82 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628-842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS + , a 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -31 -89 PAGE 17 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 339.13 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND 42.96 FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND 1,970.16 FUND 30 TOTAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 420.40 FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND 196,702.47 '^-_ter FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 25 173,1.62 FUND 60 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 909,270.21* 999,188.41. TOTAL