HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-12-04_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
DECEMBER 4, 1989
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
I. APPROVAL OF PRA MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 20, 1989
II. ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *)
and in bold print are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one
motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Council
member or citizen so requests, in, which case the item will be removed.from the
consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda.
II. PUBLIC HEARING - PROPERTY TAX INCREASE - 1990 BUDGET (Continue to 12/18/89)
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to.close hearing.
Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote
of all members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property
Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass.
A. Second Readin
1. Ordinance No. 804 - Regulating Plats and Subdivisions
2. Ordinance No. 825 -A30 - Requiring Larger Minimum Lot Areas and
Dimensions for Certain Lots in the R -1 District
B. Request to Reconsider Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 825 -A32 - To Allow
Private Clubs in PC -1 District
IV. ORDINANCES First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second
Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of all members of Council required
to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members
of Council required to pass.
A. First Reading - Ordinance No. 1232 -A1 - Amending Ordinance No. 1232 to
Include Regulation of the Use of All Municipal Parking Facilities
V. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
VI. AWARD OF BIDS
A. Collection of Garbage/Refuse - City Properties (Contd from 11/20/89)
* B. Scoreboards - Van Valkenburg Park
* C. Furnace System - Braemar Golf Dome
* D. Emergency.Repair - Well #2
VII., RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
* A. Set Year End Council Meeting Date (12/27/89 - 4:30 p.m.)
* B. Feasibility Report - Street Lighting - Set Hearing Date (12/18/89)
C. Recommendation - BFI Recycling Contract Amendment
VIII. RESOLUTIONS Favorable rollcall vote by majority of quorum to pass.
* A. Appointment of Agents of Edina Community Health Board
Agenda
Edina City Council
Page 2
IX. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
X. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
XI. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
A. Confirmation - First Council Meeting in January - Tuesday, January 2
XII. FINANCE
* A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 12/4/89, Total $502,271.27
0
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Sat
Dec
16
Council Study Session
8:00
a.m.
Braemar Clubhouse
Mon
Dec
18
Joint Council /Park Board Meeting
6:00
p.m.
Mgrs Conf Rm
Regular Council Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council Room
Mon
Dec
25
CHRISTMAS DAY - City Hall Closed
Wed-
Dec
27
Year End Council Meeting
4:30
p.m.
Mgrs Conf Rm
Mon
Jan
1
NEW YEAR'S .DAY - City Hall Closed
Tues
Jan
2
Regular Council Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council Room
Mon
Jan
15
MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY - City Hall Closed
Mon
Jan
22
Regular Council Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council Room
MINUTES
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVEIAPMENT AUTHORITY
NOVEMBER 20 1989
Answering rollcall were Commissioners Paulus, Rice, Smith and Chairman Richards.
MINUTES of the HRA Meeting of November 6, 1989 were approved as submitted by
motion of Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Rice.
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, the meeting was adjourned by
motion of Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Rice. Motion carried.
Executive Director
A.
A
o e -.10
�O
•'NCbAPOW`1. t'9 •
�BaB
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Kenneth Rosland
From: Craig Larsen
Date: December 4, 1989
Subject: New Subdivision Ordina
No. 825 and Zoning
Ordinance Amendment
825 -A30
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # TTT_ A.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
® To Council
Action ❑ Motion
❑ Resolution
El Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Second reading for new Subdivision Ordinance and corresponding Zoning Ordinance
Amendments.
Info /Background:
Attached is the final draft of the proposed new Subdivision Ordinance and
-corresponding amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. The Subdivision Ordinance
revises the definition of Neighborhood to include all single family lots within
1000 feet of the property proposed for subdivision. Other changes to the
Ordinances are underlined. These changes are made to correct inconsistencies
within the Ordinance.
Following the November 20, 1989, Council meeting we applied the new definition
to various areas of the City to understand the impact of the change. We are
concerned that, in many cases, 1000 feet will give a distorted view of the
merits of a proposed subdivision. In many cases 1000 feet will draw in lots
which are much larger or much smaller than lots which are most impacted by a
proposed subdivision. Several examples that illustrate the 1000 foot radius are
attached for your review.
iii
Staff suggests the area used to define Neighborhood be revised to read "all
single dwelling unit lots wholly or partially within 500 feet of the property
proposed for subdivision." We believe that a 500 foot radius will provide for
an adequate number of lots and will define a neighborhood which more directly
relates to the property proposed for subdivision. Also, although not the reason
for our recommendation, the reduced area will lower the cost to the proponent
and to the City. Examples of the 500 foot Neighborhood area are attached.
At the November 20, 1989, meeting members of the Council questioned the need for
a fixed definition of Neighborhood. It should be pointed out that a fixed
definition of Neighborhood is the cornerstone of the Ordinance. Without a fixed
definition it would be impossible to calculate the minimum lot area and
dimensional standards required by the Ordinance. If the Council chooses not to
provide a definition of Neighborhood, the Ordinance as currently written, should
not be adopted.
Finally, if, for any reason, the Ordinance is not granted second reading, the
Moratorium should be extended. It is due to expire December 14, 1989.
NEIGHBORHOOD:
All lots in the Single Dwelling Unit District as established by the Zoning Ordinance
which are wholly or partially within oo feet of the perimeter proposed plat or
subdivision,
except, however, those lots used for publicly owned parks, playgrounds, athletic
facilities and golf courses, and except those lots used for conditional uses as
established by the Zoning Ordinance.
If the neighborhood includes only a part of a lot, then the whole of that lot or shall be
Included in the neighborhood. As to streets on the perimeter of the proposed plat or
subdivision, the 1000 feet shall be measured from the common line of the street and the
proposed plat or subdivision.
NEIGHBORHOOD:
An bas in the Single Dwelling Unit District as established by the Zoning Ordinance
Much are wholly or partially within feet of the perimeter proposed plat or
std�divisk n,
excepC however, those lots used for publicly owned parks, playgrounds, athletic
faces and golf courses, and except those lots used for conditional uses as
.established by the Zoning Ordinance.
If the neighborhood includes only a part of a lot, then the whole of that lot or shall be
ftftfed in the hood. As to streets on the perimeter of the proposed plat or
subtilinsion, the 1000 feet shall be measured from the common line of the street and the
proposed plat or svftivision.
NEIGHBORHOOD: -
All lots in the Single Dwelling Unit District as established by the Zoning Ordnnance
which are wholly or partially within of the perimeter proposed plat or
subdivision,
excep4 however, those lots used for publicly owned parks, playgrounds, athletic
facilities and golf courses, and except those lots used for conditional uses as
established by the Zoning Ordinance.
If the neighborhood includes only a part of a lot, then the whole of that lot or shall be
Included In the neighborhood. As to streets on the perimeter of the proposed plat or
subdivision, the 1000 feet shall be measured from the common line of the street and the
proposed plat or subdivision.
NEIGHBORHOOD:
All lots in the Single Dwelling Unit District as established by the Zoning Ordinance
which are wholly or partially within 500 feet of the perimeter proposed plat or
subdivision,
except, however, those lots used for publicly owned parks, playgrounds, athletic
facilities and golf courses, and except those lots used for conditional uses as
established by the Zoning Ordinance.
If the neighborhood includes only a part of a lot, then the whole of that lot or shall be
Included in the neighborhood. As to streets on the perimeter of the proposed plat or
subdivision, the 1000 feet shall be measured from the common line of the street and the
proposed plat or subdivision.
NEIGHBORHOOD:
An lots in the Single Dwelling Unit District as established by the Zoning Ordinance
which are wholly or partlally within 1000 feet of the perimeter proposed plat or
subdivision,
excep4 however, those lots used for publicly owned parks, playgrounds, athletic
facilities and golf courses, and except those lots used for conditional uses as
established by the Zoning Ordinance.
If the neighborhood includes only a part of a lot, then the whole of that lot or shall be
included in the neighborhood. As to streets on the perimeter of the proposed plat or
subdivision, the 1000 feet shalt be measured from the common line of the street and the
proposed plat or subdivision.
NEIGHBORHOOD:
All lots in the Single Dwelling Unit District as established by the Zoning Ordatance
which are wholly or partially wIthIn500 feet of the perimeter proposed plat or
subdivision,
excep4 however, those lots used for publicly owned parks, playgrounds, alldeft
facilities and golf courses, and except those lots used for conditional uses as
established by the Zoning Ordinance.
If the neighborhood includes only a part of a lot, then the whole of that lot or strap be
Included in the neighborhood. As to streets on the perimeter of the proposed plat or
subdivision, the 1000 feet shall be measured from the common line of the street and the
proposed plat or subdivision.
350 PARE AVENUE
NEW YORE, NEW YORE 10022
(212) 415 -9200
1330 CONNECTICUT AVENUE, N. W.
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20036
(202) 857 -0700
3 ORACECHURCH STREET
LONDON EC3V OAT, ENGLAND
01 -929- 3334
36, RUE TRONCHET
75009 PARIS, FRANCE
0I- 42- 66 -59 -49
PAR EAST FINANCE CENTER
HONG KONG
852 -5- 8612555
DOBSEY & WHITNEY
A PwnTNCNSHIP INCLOOINO Poore SSION�L COHIOWTIONS
2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST 340 FIRST NATIONAL BANE BUILDING
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA ,13402
ROCHESTER, -3156 35903
(5o7)28e -31as
(612)340 -2600 315 FIRST NATIONAL BANE BUILDING
TELEX 21)- (1(i0`S WAYZATA,MINNESOTA 55391
FAX (fi12) -1. to (612) 475-0373
THOMAS S. ERICKSON, P. A.
(612) 340 -2659
November 27., 1989
Honorable Members of City Council
of City of Edina; and
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager
4801 West 50 Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
1200 FIRST INTERSTATE CENTER
BILLINGS, MONTANA 59103
(406)252 -3800
201 DAVIDSON BUILDING
GREAT PALLS, MONTANA 59401
(406)727 -3832
127 EAST FRONT STREET
MISSOULA,MONTANA 59802
(406) 721 -6025
Re: Proposed Ordinance No. 804 (the "Proposed
Ordinances ")
Dear Members of the City Council and Mr. Rosland:
This letter is written .in response to a letter that the
Edina City Council received.from Peter K. Beck on behalf of Mr.
Stephen Utne. Mr. Utne owns property located at 5257 Lochloy Drive
(Lot 6, Block 1, Edina Highlands). Mr. Beck's letter states that
this property is a single.family lot consisting of 35,671 square
feet with 159 +.feet of frontage on Lochloy Drive. Mr. Beck's letter
indicates that Mr. Utne originally applied to subdivide the property
on August 17, 1988, and submitted a revised plat on November 16,
1988. According to Mr. Beck,.the proposed subdivision complies
with the City's existing subdivision ordinances, and the Planning
staff has recommended approval.. Mr. Beck further. purports that
the .proposed subdivision-is identical to a subdivision which
received preliminary approval in 19.64.
Consideration of Mr. Utne's proposed subdivision was
tabled pursuant to a moratorium adopted by the City Council that
became effective on December 14, 1988. The resolution adopting
the moratorium directed the City staff to study and make
recommendations with respect to changing or clarifying the
procedures and criteria for approving subdivisions.
In response to the moratorium, the City staff drafted
the Proposed Ordinance, which is currently under consideration
by the City Council. The Proposed Ordinance requires, in part,
that if a proposed plat is within the R -1 District, then the minimum
lot area, lot width and lot depth must, under certain conditions,
be the same or greater than the median lot area,.lot width and
DORSEY & WHITNEY
Honorable Members of City Council
of City of Edina; and
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager
November 27, 1989
Page Two
lot depth of lots in the "neighborhood." The Proposed Ordinance
defines "neighborhood," in part, as all lots within 1,000 feet
of the perimeter of the proposed plat or subdivision.
Apparently, based on Mr. Beck's letter, Mr. Utne's
proposed subdivision does not meet the requirements set forth in
the Proposed Ordinance. Therefore, Mr. Utne objects to the Proposed
Ordinance on the grounds set out in Mr. Beck's letter, namely:
1. it violates the uniformity requirement of state law; 2. it does
not promote the public health, safety,:morals or general welfare;
3. it .places an unreasonable burden on the property owner; 4. it
is unnecessary; and 5. it will take Mr. Utne's property. Our
response to those objections is as follows:
1. The Proposed Ordinance Does Comply with the Uniformity
Requirements of State Law.
Mr. Beck argues that the Proposed Ordinance is unfair
and unlawful insofar as it will violate the uniformity requirements
of state law. Minnesota Statute Section 462.358 states that
subdivision regulations "shall be uniform for each class or kind
of subdivision." Minn. Stat. § 462.358, Subd. la; see also Minn.
Stat. § 462.357, Subd. 1 (providing that zoning regulations "shall
be uniform for each class or kind of buildings, structures, or
land and for each class or kind of use throughout such district,
but the regulations in one district may differ from those in other
districts "). Mr. Beck argues that the Proposed Ordinance creates
double standards between lots that are already developed and lots
which "require replatting to achieve full development." This
argument however, misses the mark. The purpose of subdivision
regulations generally is to promote the orderly development of
undeveloped property. The determination of whether an existing
lot is capable of being further developed or subdivided is made
by applying the requirements contained in the zoning and subdivision
regulations. With respect to Mr. Beck's argument that the Proposed
Ordinance's minimum dimensional requirements will apply only to
future subdivisions and not to existing lots, a municipality clearly
has the right to amend its ordinances in furtherance of the public
health, safety and welfare, even if such amendment results in a
restriction of uses that would have been allowed under its old
ordinance. See, e.g., Olsen v. City of Hopkins, 288 Minn. 25,
30 (1970); Parranto Bros. v. City of New Brighton, 425 N.W.2d 585,
589 -90 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988).
.11, 1 i
DORSEY & WHITNEY
Honorable Members of City Council
of City of Edina; and
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager
November 27, 1989
Page Three
Mr. Beck also contends that the Proposed Ordinance is
not uniform because "each lot to be subdivided is the reference
point for a new neighborhood." As noted above, the Proposed
Ordinance defines the "neighborhood," in part, as all lots within
1,000 feet of the perimeter of the proposed plat or subdivision.
As a result of this method of defining neighborhood, Mr. Beck
suggests that two lots on the same street might be subject to
different dimensional requirements depending on the size of the
surrounding lots. In short, Mr. Beck erroneously argues that the
Proposed Ordinance treats similarly situated property differently.
The Comprehensive Plan allows the subdivision of single
family lots only if the character and symmetry of the neigborhood
is-preserved. In Edina, as well as in most other municipalities,
the size and shapes of lots within different neighborhoods will
vary from neighborhood to neighborhood. To effectuate the
requirement in the Comprehensive Plan that all proposed subdivisions
accord with the character and symmetry of the neighborhood, the
term "neighborhood" must be defined with reference to the particular
lots being proposed for subdivision.
When a municipality draws lines to' establish land use
classifications, "it acts in a legislative capacity under its
delegated police powers." State, by Rochester Assoc. of
Neighborhoods v. City of-Rochester, 268 N.W.2d 885, 888 (Minn.
1978) "As a legislative act, a zoning or rezoning classification
must be upheld unless opponents prove that the classification is
unsupported by any rational basis related to promoting public
health, safety, morals or general welfare, or that the
classification amounts to a taking without compensation." Id.
Moreover, "[e]ven when the reasonableness of a zoning ordinance
is debatable, or where there are conflicting opinions as to the
desirability of the restrictions it imposes it is not the
function of the courts to interfere with the legislative discretion
of such issues." Id. (quoting Sun Oil Co. v. Village of New Hope,
300 Minn. 326 324 (1974)); see also Perron v. Village of New
Brighton, 145 N.W.2d 425, 429 (Minn. 1966). Although these cases
involve zoning classifications, in our opinion Minnesota courts
would apply the same standards to subdivision classifications.
In short, Minnesota courts have on numerous occassions
endorsed the proposition that land use classifications are best
determined by municipalities, rather than courts. As Justice Holmes
stated:
Doi?sEy & WHITNEY
Honorable Members of City Council
of City of Edina; and
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager
November 27, 1989
Page Four
When a legal distinction is determined, as no one
doubts that it may be, between night and day,. childhood
and maturity, or any other extremes, a point has to be
fixed or a.line has to be drawn, or gradually picked
out by successive decisions, to mark where the change
takes place. Looked at by itself without regard to the
necessity-behind it the line or point seems arbitrary.
It might as well be a little more to one side or the
other. But when it is seen that a line or point there
must be, and that there is no mathematical or logical
way of fixing it precisely, the decision of the
legislature must be accepted unless we can say that it
is very wide of any reasonable mark.
Louisville Gas'& Electric Co. v. Coleman, 277 U.S. 32, 41 (1928)
(dissenting opinion).
The line drawing in issue concerns the .definition of
"neighborhood." This definition, as well as the entire Proposed
Ordinance, resulted from the lengthy and thoughtful analysis of
planning alternatives undertaken by the City staff. Although the
method of determining the "neighborhood" may result in different
minimum dimensional requirements for two lots on the same street,
this difference in treatment does.not violate the uniformity
requirements established by statute and case law. The law requires
that zoning regulations provide like.treatment to similarly situated
,properties. If two lots are in different "neighborhoods" that
are composed of different size lots, they would not be similarly
situated, even if the two lots are on the same street. An analogous
situation involves two lots that are on the same street and are
divided by a zoning classification. For example, one lot may be
in a residential district, while the other lot is in a. commercial
district. Although.such zoning boundaries place different
restrictions on the neighboring lot owners, this.disparate treatment
is not unlawful as long as the boundary line is reasonable and
relates to the health, welfare or safety of the community. See,
e.g., Perron, 145 N.W.2d at 429. To establish that the Proposed
Ordinance treats similarly situated lots differently, one
challenging the ordinance would have to demonstrate that two
different lots of the same size in neighborhoods with lots of the
same size have been afforded different treatment under the.Proposed
Ordinance. The Proposed ordinance, however, has been drafted to
insure that this will not happen by objectively defining
"neighborhood," and by specifying the minimum dimensional
requirements.
DORSEY & WHITNEY
Honorable Members of City Council
of City of Edina; and
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager
November 27, 1989
Page Five
2. The Purposes of the Proposed Ordinance Do Relate
to and Promote the General Welfare.
Mr. Beck argues that the Proposed Ordinance is unlawful
because it does not promote the public health, safety, morals or
general welfare. The Proposed Ordinance, however, promotes numerous
legitimate goals. The purpose and objectives of the Proposed
Ordinance include: (i) providing for the orderly, economic and
safe development of land; (ii) developing a consistency with and
an aid to help implement the zoning ordinances of the City; (iii)
supporting and furthering the City's Comprehensive Plan by
establishing uniform procedures and regulations.to preserve and
enhance the value and viable economic use of property; and (iv)
protecting the character and symmetry of neighborhoods in the City.
These legitimate goals are supported both by statute and case law.
See, e.g., Kelber v. City of St. Louis Park, 289 Minn. 456 (1971)
(general welfare includes protecting the character of the
neighborhood); County of Wright v. Kennedy, 415 N.W.2d 728 (Minn.
Ct. App. 1987) (protection of property values traditionally
recognized as a proper purpose in promoting the general welfare);
Minn. Stat. § 462.358, Subd. la (a municipality may adopt
subdivision regulations to protect and promote the public health,
safety and general welfare, and to provide for the orderly,
economic, and safe development of land). Contrary to Mr. Beck's
suggestion, the Proposed Ordinance.is not intended to reduce
population density. Large lot subdivisions are not promoted; the
lots in any given plat may be small or large depending on the
neighborhood.
Mr. Beck also suggests that the goal of preserving the
character of the neighboorhood is rooted in aesthetic considerations
and neighborhood opposition, and therefore, cannot serve as a basis
for the Proposed Ordinance. The Proposed Ordinance., however,
imposes minimum dimensional requirements regardless of whether
the neighboring land owners are in favor of, or are against, a
proposed subdivision. Furthermore, the goal of preserving the
character and symmetry of the neighborhoods encompasses more than
aesthetic concerns. This purpose is also aimed at protecting
property values and insuring the stability of neighborhoods. To
the extent that preserving the character and symmetry of a
neighborhood reflects aesthetic considerations, the Minnesota
Supreme Court has held that an aesthetic purpose does not diminish
the integrity of an ordinance, even if the.aesthetic purpose is
deemed dominant. See County of Pine v. State Dept. of Natural
DOASEy & WHITNEY
Honorable Members of City Council
of City of Edina; and
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager
November 27, 1989
Page Six
Resources, 280 N.W.2d 625, 629 (Minn. 1979); see also Naegele
Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Village of Minnetonka, 281 Minn. 492,
499 (1968) (fact that aesthetic considerations were a significant
factor in motivating the adoption of an ordinance will not
invalidate an otherwise valid ordinance).
3. The Proposed Ordinance Does Not Place Unreasonable
Burdens on Lot Owners.
.Mr. Beck argues that requiring lot owners to obtain
detailed information regarding dimensions of-surrounding lots places
an unreasonable burden on those who wish to subdivide their
property. However, that information is readily available in the
City or County records, and collection of that information does
not require any field work or special expertise, only time and
patience. Therefore, the additional burden of obtaining that
information should be reasonable relative to the benefit sought
by the applicant.
Welfare. 4. The Proposed Ordinance. Reasonably Furthers the General
Mr. Beck argues that the Proposed. Ordinance is
unnecessary. As noted above, a municaplity has the authority to
amend and revise its land use regulations. See Olsen, 288 Minn:
at 30; see also Minn. Stat. § 462.357, Subd.. 4. (allowing for
amendments to zoning ordinances). An amendment, however, need
not be "necessary." Rather, "[t]he power-to amend and revise a
zoning ordinance, like the power to enact the original plan, must
be exercised reasonably in furtherance of the public health, safety
and welfare 13A Dunnell Minn. Digest 2d Municipal Corporations
§ 6.00(c) (citing Olsen v. City of Hopkins). As discussed, the
Proposed Ordinance furthers various public interests. In addition,
the Proposed Ordinance refines the existing ordinance by providing
both the..City Council and property owners with eertain, specific
and objective guidelines for determining whether a lot may be
subdivided. Minnesota courts have expressed concern in the past
with vague and standardless guidelines and boundaries. See, e.g.,
C.R. Investments v. Village of Shoreview, 304 N.W.2d 320 (Minn.
1981); Minnetonka Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses v. Svee,
226 N.W.2d 306 (Minn. 1975); Hay v. Township of Grow, 296 Minn. 1
(1973); Odell. v. City of Eagan, 348 N.W.2d 792 (Minn. Ct. App.
1984); see also Olsen v. City of Hopkins, 276 Minn. 163, 169 (1967)
(boundaries of use districts must be fixed and expressed with
DOIRSEY & WFIITNEY
Honorable Members of City Council
of City of Edina; and
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager
November 27, 1989
Page Seven
sufficient certainty); Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources v.
City of Waterville,. 354 N.W.2d 544, 546 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984)
(boundaries of a municipal use district must be defined and
expressed with certainty). Although the City believes that the
current ordinance is specific enough to pass judicial scrutiny,
the Proposed Ordinance furthers the spirit of the courts' concerns
by incorporating a greater level of specificity and objectivity
into the City's subdivision regulations.
5. The Proposed Ordinance Will Not Result in a Taking
of Mr. Utne's Property.
Last, Mr. Beck argues that the Proposed Ordinance will
result in the taking of Mr. Utne's property if the Proposed
Ordinance prohibits the subdivision of the property. By
implication, Mr. Beck is saying the City must compensate Mr. Utne
for such a "taking. A Minnesota court will employ one of two
different tests to determine whether a zoning law effects a taking
for which payment must be made. See Parranto Bros., 425 N.W.2d
at 590 -92. Under the established test set forth in Agins v. City
of Tiburon, 447 U.S. 225,'260 (1980), "[t]he application of a
general zoning law to a particular property effects a taking if
[(i)] the ordinance does not substantially advance legitimate state
interests or [(ii)] denies an owner economically-viable use of
the land." Parranto Bros., 425 N.W.2d at 590. As discussed above,
the Proposed Ordinance substantially advances several legitimate
state and City interests, including: providing for the economic,
orderly and safe development of the land; developing a consistency
with, and helping to implement the City's zoning ordinance and
Comprehensive Plan; supporting and furthering the City's
Comprehensive Plan by establishing uniform procedures and
regulations to preserve and enhance the value and viable economic
use of property; and protecting the character and symmetry of
neighborhoods. With respect to the second element of the Agins
test, the proposed ordinance would not deny Mr. Utne the economic
or viable use of his lot. Mr. Utne's property will remain valuable
as a single family lot. Even if the market value of Mr. Utne's
lot declines, the Minnesota Supreme Court has made clear that mere
diminution in market value is not sufficient to demonstrate a taking
when a reasonable use of the land is permitted under the zoning
ordinance. See County of Pine, 280 N.W.2d at 630, n.4.
In addition to the Agins test, the United States Supreme
Court has also used a three part analysis, inquiring into: (i)
DORSEY & WHITNEY
Honorable Members of City Council
'of City of Edina; and
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager
November 27, 1989
Page Eight
the economic impact of the regulation on the property owner; (ii)
the extent to which the regulation has interfered with.
investment- backed expectations; and (iii) the character of the
governmental action. See Connolly v. Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corp., 475 U.S. 2119, 224 (1986); Parranto Bros., 425 N.W.2d at
590 -92. Application of the Connolly test also demonstrates that
the Proposed Ordinance will not effect a compensable taking of
Mr. Utne's property. First, although the Proposed Ordinance may
have an economic impact on Mr. Utne's property, the property will
remain economically viable notwithstanding any prohibition of its
subdivision which may result from the Proposed Ordinance. Second,
assuming for the sake of argument that Mr. Utne has legitimate,
investment- backed expectations, a point which the City does not
concede, Mr. Utne knew, or should have known, when he purchased
the lot that any proposed subdivision would be subject to municipal
regulations and restrictions. In this regard, the Minnesota Court
of Appeals has held that extensive governmental regulations
involving zoning, coupled with a city's prior, actions, will operate
to diminish the landowner's claimed.investment- backed expectations.
See Parranto Bros., 425 N.W.2d at 592. Last, if the City Council
adopts the Proposed Ordinance, which is designed to effect the
Comprehensive Plan, it will be acting in an- "arbitration " - capacity.
Where a municipality is acting in an "arbitration" capacity to
effect a comprehensive plan, there is "no..taking unless :the owner
has been denied 'all reasonable'uses of the property.'" Id.
(quoting McShane v. City of Faribault, 292 N.W.2d 253 257—N.2
(Minn. 1980)).
In summary, it is our opinion that: the minimum
dimensional.requirements and the definition of "neighborhood" set
forth in:the Proposed Ordinance meet the uniformity requirements
established by statute and case law; the Proposed Ordinance promotes
and furthers numerous, legitimate goals; and the Proposed Ordinance
will not.result in a compensable taking of Mr.-Utne's property.
TSE:jd
cc: Michael Bolen, Esq.
Peter K. Beck, Esq.
Very truly yours,
Thomas S. Erickson
29538
ORDINANCE NO. 804
AN ORDINANCE REGULATING PLATS AND SUBDIVISIONS,
PRESCRIBING THE PROCEDURE FOR APPROVAL OF PLATS
AND SUBDIVISIONS, PROVIDING: FOR VARIANCES,
REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. -801, AND PRESCRIBING A
PENALTY
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Purpose and Objectives. The purpose and objectives
of this ordinance are to provide for the orderly, economic and safe
development of land and urban services and facilities, to facilitate
adequate provision for transportation, water, sewage, storm
drainage, schools, parks, playgrounds and other public services and
facilities; to promote the public health, safety and general welfare
by establishing physical standards, design requirements and
procedures for plats and subdivisions of land; to allow flexibility
in design of plats and subdivisions; to develop a consistency with
and to help implement the zoning, building and other applicable
ordinances and codes of the City; to support and 'further the City's
comprehensive plan by establishing uniform procedures and
regulations for plats and subdivisions: to preserve and enhance the
value and .viable economic use of property; to protect the character
and symmetry of neighborhoods in the City: and to protect and
further, and not frustrate, legitimate: investment" backed
expectations of property owners.
Sec. 2. Definitions; Construction Rules; Severability.
(a) Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, as
used herein, shall have the following meanings:
Applicant: All persons, whether one or more, who request
approval by* the City of a plat, subdivision or lot division,
pursuant to this ordinance.
City: -The City of Edina, Minnesota.
Commission: The Community Development_ and Planning. Commission
of the City.
Comprehensive Plan: The Coy vrc:sensive Plan of the City adopted
by the City in 1980, pursuant to .applicable Minnesota Statutes, as
now or hereafter amended or modified, and including any similar plan
or plans as may supersede or be substituted for said Comprehensive
Plan. Said Comprehensive Plan is incorporated into this- ordinance
by this reference thereto as completely as if fully set out herein.
5a
Council: The City Council of the City.
Engineer: The Director of Public Works and Engineering for the
City.
Median: The value (being, in this ordinance, lot area, lot
depth or lot width, as the case may be) in an ordered set of such
values below which. and above which there is an equal number of such
values, or which is the arithemetic mean of the two middle values if
- there is no one such middle value.
Neighborhood:. Alltlots in the Single Dwelling Unit District as
established by the Zoning Ordinance which are wholly or partially
within 1%1.000 feet of the perimeter of the proposed plat or
subdivision, A xcent. however. those lots used for publicly gynt -A
Parks, vlayarounds, athletic facilities and golf courses and except
th2se Iota used for conditional uses as established by the Zoning-
-Ordinance, If the neighborhoodr%includes only a part of a not, then
the whole of thatkot shall beAincluded in the neighborhood. AA to
streets on the Perimeter of the proposed plat or subdivision the
1.000 feet shall- be measured from the common line of the street and
the proposed plat or subdivision.
Of Record: Recorded :.in the office of the County Recorder,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, or filed in the Office of the Registrar
of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota, whichever, is the appropriate
office to give constructive notice of the document of record.
ut An area,. parcel, tract or lot of land shown on a plat
or subdivision as an outlot.
Parcel, Tract or Lot: The definitions in the, Zoning Ordinance
for parcel, tract and lot are incorporated herein by reference.
Planner: The Planner of the City.
Plat: The map of one or more subdivisions prepared for filing
of record pursuant to, and 'containing, elements and requirements
in, Chapter, 505 of Minnesota Statutes, and containing all of the
elements and requirements for a subdivision set, forth in this
ordinance, to the extent such requirements and elements were not
waived pursuant to such statute or ordinance, or: containing all of
the .elements and requirements imposed by, and not waived pursuant
to, the statutes and ordinances which were applicable when such map
was prepared for filing of record.
NSubdivision: The separation of 'an area of land, of a parcel,
tract or lot into two or more parcels, tracts or lots, or long -term
leasehold interests where the creation of the leasehold interests
necessitates the creation of streets, roads or alleys, for
541
residential, commercial, industrial or other use, or any combination
thereof, except those separations:
(1) where all the resulting parcels, tracts, lots or
interests will be 20 acres or larger in size and 500 feet
in width for residential uses and 5 acres or larger in size
for commercial and industrial uses;
(2) creating cemetery lots; or
(3) resulting from court orders, or the .adjustment of
a lot line by the relocation of a common boundary.
For purposes of this ordinance, a subdivision shall include
Registered Land Surveys and Auditor's Subdivisions.
Zoning Ordinance: Ordinance No. 825 of the City, and all
amendments, modifications and supplements thereto and= thereof now or
hereafter made, and- all ordinances hereafter adopted by the Council
as. successors to-'said Ordinance No. 825.. Said Ordinance No. 825 is
incorporated into this ordinance by this reference thereto as
completely.as if fully set out herein.
(b) Construction 'Rules. The rules of construction set out in
Section 3.A of the Zoning Ordinance are incorporated herein by
reference.
(c) ...Severability. The provisions of Section.3.C.of the Zoning
Ordinance are incorporated herein by reference.
Sec. 3. Plat Required.
(a) . Every subdivision, except as provided in Sec. 4 hereof,
shall be platted in full compliance with Chapter 505, Minnesota
Statutes, this ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive
Plan.
(b) Any land transferred from one zoning district to another
zoning district,. excluding, however., transfers to or from the
Heritage Preservation Overlay District or the Flood Plain Overlay
District, as defined in the Zoning Ordinance, shall be platted in
full compliance with Chapter, 505, Minnesota Statutes, this
ordinance, the Zoning. Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan, in
connection with, at the time of, and as a condition to, such
transfer.
(c) The provisions of this ordinance shall apply also to
parcels taken from a parcel, tract or lot then existing of record by
use of a metes and bounds description, and such subdivisions shall
be platted in full compliance with Chapter 505, Minnesota Statutes,
this ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
-3-
i
Sec. 4. Plat Not Required.
(a) Double Dwelling Units. No plat shall be required for
subdivisions of lots in Double Dwelling Unit Districts pursuant to
Sec. 7(a) of this ordinance, but only a lot division pursuant to
paragraph (b) of this Sec. 4-shall be required.
(b) Lot. Divisions. No, plat shall be required for any lot
division which adjusts or relocates a common lot line separating two
lots and which does not create a new undeveloped parcel, tract or
lot that complies, alone or in combination with one or more other
parcels, tracts or lots, with the applicable minimum lot area and
other requirements of this ordinance and the Zoning Ordinance.
However, before any such lot division shall be made or any
conveyance resulting therefrom is placed of record, the Council
shall adopt a resolution approving the same, and the procedure
therefor shall be the same as for preliminary plat approval as set
out in Sec. 10 of this ordinance, except that (i) notice of the
hearing before the Council need not be published as to lot divisions
made pursuant to this paragraph (b) (but shall be made for
subdivisions pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section), (ii) no
sign. need be :erected, and (iii) only a.survey prepared and signed by
a Minnesota registered land surveyor showing the proposed lot
division need be filed with the Planner together with the required
fee and such .additional information that, in the opinion of the
Planner, is necessary for evaluation of the lot division and
determination that it is consistent with the requirements of this
ordinance.
Sec.. 5. Variances. The Council. may waive compliance with any
provisions of this ordinance by adoption of a resolution specifying
which provisions have been waived in any case where (i) compliance
will involve an unnecessary hardship - and where noncompliance does
not interfere with the purposes of this ordinance, or (ii) an
improved plat can be achieved by variances from the requirements of
this ordinance.
Sec. 6. Denial of Permits. No building permit or other permit
for the development or improvement of land shall be issued for
construction of a building on, or the development or improvement of,
.any parcel, tract or lot:
(a) conveyed in violation of the provisione -if Chapter 462,
Minnesota Statutes;
(b) in any plat or subdivision hereafter made not complying
with the requirements of this ordinance and approved by the Council
pursuant to this ordinance;
-4-
(c) in any plat hereafter made which has not been filed and a
certified copy thereof delivered to the Planner as required by Sec.
10(f) hereof; or
(d) which is an outlot.
Sec. 7. Outlots. It'is the policy of the City to allow outlots
on plats and subdivisions presented' to the City for approval
pursuant to this ordinance, but only for the purpose of simplifying
the descriptions. of parcels of land (i) that would otherwise be
excepted from the platted area, or (ii) that are to be conveyed or
dedicated to the City or other public body. Therefore, any outlots
shown on a plat or subdivision approved by the Council shall not be,
nor be deemed to be, lots or parcels as defined in the Zoning
Ordinance, nor shall any such outlots be developed by the erection
or placing of improvements thereon, except, however, for
improvements erected or placed by the City or other public body upon
outlots conveyed or dedicated to it, unless first replatted into
lots and blocks pursuant to this ordinance and the -applicable
provisions of state law.
Sec. 8. Double Dwellina Unit District (R -2) and Townhouse Plats.
(a) Double Dwelling Units. Any lot in the Double Dwelling Unit
District as then determined by the Zoning Ordinance may be
subdivided into two lots notwithstanding the regulations stated in
the Zoning Ordinance which apply to. the Single Dwelling Unit
District. Provided, that as a condition to the approval of such
subdivision the owner or owners of the lot to be subdivided shall
make a separate and independent connection of each dwelling unit on
the lot to be subdivided with the public sanitary sewer and water
mains, or obtain a waiver from the Council of such connection, and
pay the connection charges therefor, if any, all as required by City
Ordinance Nos. 431, 1101 and 1111, and after such conditions are met
and complied with, the City Clerk shall give a certified copy of the
Council resolution approving such subdivision.
(b) Townhouse Plats. As conditions to the approval of any
townhouse plat, as defined in the Zoning Ordinance, of previously
built and .then existing townhouses, as defined in the Zoning
Ordinance, each townhouse shall be separately and independently
connected to the sanitary sewer and water mains, or the requirement
for such connections shall be°weived, and the connection charges
therefor, if any, shall be paid, all as required by Ordinance Nos.
431, 1101, and 1111, and alter such conditions are met and complied
with, the City Clerk shall give a certified copy of the Council
resolution approving such plat or subdivision.
-5-
Sec. 9. Fees; Charges.
(a) All plats and subdivisions, and all lot divisions pursuant
to Sec. 4(b) hereof, presented for approval by the Commission and
Council shall be filed with the City Planning Department and shall
be accompanied by a filing fee as then_ prescribed by ,Ordinance No.
171 of the City for services to be rendered by City employees in
processing the proposed plat. Said fee shall not be refunded for
any reason including, without limitation, rejection of the plat,
subdivision or lot division by the Council, or abandonment or
withdrawal of the proposed plat, subdivision or lot division by the
proponent. The City shall have no duty to process or act on any
plat, subdivision or lot division unless and until the applicable
fee has been paid to the City.
(b) Each person, by filing or submitting an application for
approval by the City of a proposed plat, subdivision or lot
division, shall have agreed to pay all administrative expenses and
attorneys' fees, with interest and costs as ..herein provided,
incurred by the City in .connection with -or as a result of reviewing
and acting on such application. If more than one person signs an
application, all such signers shall be jointly and severally liable
for such expenses and fees, with interest and costs as herein
provided. The expenses and fees to be paid to the City pursuant to
this paragraph shall be payable upon demand made by the City, and if
not paid within 5 days after such demand is made, shall bear
interest from the date of demand until. paid at a . rate equal to the
lesser of the .highest interest rate allowed by law or two percentage
points in excess of the reference rate. Said - applicants .shall also
pay all costs, including attorneys' fees, incurred by the City in
collecting such expenses, fees and interest, with interest on such
costs of collection from the dates.. incurred until paid, at the same
interest rate as is payable on such expenses and fees. For purposes
hereof, reference rate shall mean the rate publicly announced from
time to time by First Edina Rational Bank, or any successor thereto,
as its reference rate, and if such bank, or its successor, ceases
publicly announcing its reference rate, reference rate.shall mean
the interest rate charged from time to time by -such bank, or its
successor on 90 -day unsecured, business loans to its most
creditworthy customers.
Sec. 10. Review and Approval Process.
(a) Applications; Notice; New Applications.
(1) All applications for plat, subdivision and lot
division approval shall be filed with the Planner on forms
prescribed by the Planner, and shall be signed by the
applicant and accompanied by the required fee, the proposed
plat or subdivision complying with 'the criteria and
-6-
requirements fora preliminary plat or subdivision
in Sec. 12 of this ordinance, the information from
companies pursuant to subparagraph /�. 2 Z of
paragraph (a), evidence satisfactory to the Planner
set out
utility
this
agent or representative) that the required mailed notice
has been given and required signs have been erected as
reauired by subparagraphs (3) and (4) of thin
paragraph (a). and such other information as is required by
this ordinance or any other ordinance of the City, or as is
necessary, in the opinion of the Planner, for evaluation of
the application and determining consistency and compliance
with the requirements of this ordinance and other
applicable ordinances of the City. The application shall
not be complete until all information and documents
required by this paragraph have been filed with and
delivered to the Planner.
ft.U2 There shall be delivered with each application a
written instrument from each utility company shoving that
arrangements acceptable to the Planner have been made with
the utility company for the installation of utilities in
the manner required by this ordinance and other applicable
City ordinances.
Z The Aipplicant shall erect, or cause to be
erected, a sign or signs as required by Section 4.B.2 of
the Zoning Ordinance, except that the information contained
thereon shall be as follows:
"This property proposed for subdivision.
"(Names of Applicants)
"(Telephone Numbers of Applicants)
"For information contact Edina Planning -Department, J
Phone No. 927 - 8861." /
(4) The applicant shall also give mailed notice to
the owners of all lots in the neighborhood of the
proposed plat or subdivision, as such owners and their
addresses shall be shown on a list prepared by the City,
and for a fee established pursuant to City Ordinance No.
171. The notice shall be on a form prescribed by the
Planner, but, at a minimum, shall advise of the proposed
plat or subdivision, the number of lots to be created,
and the address and phone number of the applicant.
6a
nThe sign or signs required by subparagraph (3).%
of this paragraph . �il at all times shall be kept in good
repair and shall be maintained in place until a final
decision on the application has been made by the
Council, and shall be removed by the applicant within ' 5-
days after such final decision . If such signs are not
kept in good repair or removed as herein required, then)
such signs shall be deemed a nuisance and may be abated
by the City by proceedings under Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 429, and the cost of. abatement, including
administrative expenses, may be levied as a special
assessment against the property upon which the sign is
located, or -the applicant may be . prosecuted for
violation of this ordinance, and if. convicted shall be
guilty of- a misdemeanor 'and subject to. penalties
pursuant to .Ordinance No. 175. If there is more than
one applicant, they shall be jointly and. severally
liable hereunder. 00
(6) A new application shall be required:
(i) if the final plat is not submitted for
approval by the Council by the .first anniversary
date of the Council resolution granting
preliminary approval thereof; or
(ii) if the final .plat is not filed for
record,.:and a certified copy thereof filed with
the Planner as required by paragraph (f) of this
section, by the; first anniversary date of the
Council resolution granting final approval
thereof.
(b) Hearing and Decision by.Commissioni\
(1) Upon receipt by .the Planner of the
application and all other documents. and information
required pursuant to Sec. 10(a)(1) hereof, j=
determination by the Planner that the required mailed_
notice and the required signs will have been given and
erected for at least 10 days prior to the Commission
hearing. the- Planner shall review the application and
prepare his /her report therefor and forward. the .report
to t� Commission.
r�
v
(2) Upon receipt of the report of the Planner,N
the Commission shall conduct a hearing which shall be
at least 10 days after said required notice has been
-8-
given and said' required signs erected. After hearing
the oral and written views of all persons, the
Commission shall make its recommendations at the same
or at a specified future meeting thereof. In making
its recommendation, the Commission shall be guided by
and subject to the provisions of Sec. 14 of this
ordinance. Also, if the provisions of paragraph (b)
of Sec. 11 hereof apply,. the Commission shall
recommend the dedication or easement option as
provided in said paragraph.
(c). Public Hearing By Council - Preliminary Anvroval.
(1) Upon request of the Planner or applicant,
and after the Commission has examined and considered
the proposed plat, subdivision or lot division (and
even if the Commission has failed to make a
recommendation to the Council), the Council shall set
a date for hearing thereon, which shall be not later
than 60 :days after the meeting at which the hearing
date is set. A notice of the date, time, place and
purpose of the hearing shall be published once in the
official newspaper at least 10 days before the date of
hearing; provided, however, that no published notice
need be made for lot divisions pursuant to Sec. 4(b)
hereof. After: hearing the oral or written views of
all interested persons, the Council shall make its
decision at the same meeting .or at a specified future
meeting thereof. In making its decision, the Council
shall_ be guided by and subject to the provisions of
Sec. 14. of this ordinance. Also, if the provisions of
paragraph (b) of Sec., 11 hereof* apply, -the Council
shall select its option as provided in said
paragraph. The Council may by resolution:
(i) grant preliminary approval, with or
without .modification, and without conditions, or
with such conditions reasonably related to the
purpose and objectives -of this ordinance as the
Council may deem necessary or desirable; or
(ii) grant preliminary and final approval at
the same time, with or vlthout modification, and
without conditions, or with such conditions
reasonably related ::r the purpose and objectives
of this ordinance as the Council may deem
necessary or desirable; or
(iii) refer the plat subdivision or lot
division to the Commission or other appropriate
-9-
City commissions, officers or departments for
further investigation and report to the Council
at a specified future meeting thereof; or
(iv) reject the plat, subdivision or lot
division.
(2) The Council shall preliminarily approve or
disapprove of the proposed plat or subdivision within 120
days of the receipt by the Planner of an application
completed in compliance with this Section unless applicant
agrees to an extension of the review period.
(d) Responsibility for Improvements; Subdivision Financing.
(1) When preliminary approval has been given to a
plat or subdivision, the applicant shall enter into a
Developer's Agreement (herein called the "Agreement ") with
the City, on terms -and conditions determined by the City,
and shall cause all street, water and sewer improvements
required by the Planner. or Engineer, or by the resolution
.granting preliminary approval, to be completed, pursuant to
the. Agreement and to the City's then standards and
specifications i for such improvements. Such Agreement
(A) as to improvements to' be installed by the applicant
shall obligate - the applicant to.to install and complete all
such. improvements, at applicant's own expense and under the
supervision and inspection of; the. Engineer, and shall
obligate the applicant -to 'pay to the City a fee in
compensation for such services in an amount equal to 6.5%
of the .total .construction cost of all such improvements
.within 30 days after receipt of a statement therefor,
(B) as to improvements petitioned for-by the applicant to
be installed by the City, which City installations shall be
done only in plats then situated within the Single Dwelling
Unit District, the Double Dwelling Unit District and the
Planned Residence District, as :.determined by the Zoning
Ordinance, shall obligate the City to provide engineering
services and construct the improvements and obligate the
applicant to pay to the .City the cost of such services and
construction, through payment of special assessments, which
shall: be payable in not more than 3 annual. installments,
and (C) as to improvements petitioned for by the applicant
to be installed and assessed in accordance with the regular
policies of the City, shall provide for installation if
ordered by the Council and assessment in accordance with
the then policies of the City; provided, however, that the
City shall not be obligated to enter into such agreement
(i) if the improvements required by Planner or Engineer or
by such resolution are not allocated among the methods at
-10-
(A), (B) and (C) above in a manner satisfactory to the
Engineer, or (ii) if the applicant as` to the improvements
at (A) and (B) above does not give one or more of a bond,
cash in escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit, all as
.may be required by the Planner or Engineer, or (iii) as to
any improvements, if the Council determines that the City
must borrow money to pay its costs of construction under
such Agreement and such borrowing will. jeopardize the
City's credit rating. The Agreement shall also provide, as
to improvements at (B) above, that if the applicant
transfers any lot or.parcel in the platted or subdivided
area while special assessments then levied or to be levied
for the improvements made pursuant. to said Agreement remain
unpaid, they will be paid or prepaid in-full at the time of
such transfer to the City Treasurer or the County Treasurer.
(2). Any bond required by the City shall be given by
the applicant with a corporate .surety authorized to do
business -in Minnesota and approved by the City as surety
thereon, and, as to. improvements referred to at (A) above,
shall be a performance and payment .bond in at least the
full amount of all contracts for the installation of such
improvements, and as to improvements referred to at (B)
above, shall be in the full amount of all costs. of making
the improvements specified in the Agreement not paid in
cash by the applicant before or at the time of entering
into the Agreement and shall be given for the securing to
the.City of the payment of the.special assessments.
(3) Any cash deposit required by the City shall be
deposited by the applicant, in escrow, in a national or
state bank having an office in the City, in the -full amount
of the unpaid improvement costs, together with a written
agreement signed by the applicant and the bank .whereby the
funds in escrow will be paid to the City from time to time
solely upon the - written demand of the City,- to the extent
of any default by the applicant in the Agreement then
alleged by the City.
(4) Any letter of credit required by the City shall
be from a national or state bank approved by the City,
shall be: unconditional -and: irrevocable, shall .be for the
full amount of the unpaid improvement costs, and shall
provide that funds will be paid to the City solely upon
written demand from time to time of the City to the extent
of any default by the applicant in the Agreement then
alleged by the City.
(5) If there is more than one applicant, all thereof
shall join in the Agreement, and shall be jointly and
-11-
severally obligated to perform the obligations of applicant
under the Agreement.
(e) Final Approval.
(1): When a plat or subdivision has been given
preliminary approval, the Planner shall submit a
supplementary report to the Council recommending final
approval upon receipt by the Planner of the following:
(i) a written request from. the applicant
for final approval;
(ii) evidence and documents satisfactory to
the Planner meeting and complying with the
conditions and modifications imposed by the
Council at the time of granting preliminary
approval;
(iii) the final plat meeting the requirements
of this ordinance, including Sec. 13 hereof;
(iv): the Agreement,: fully executed by the
applicant and the City,. and the security, all as
required by paragraph (d) of this section;
-(v) a letter or other signed document from
.each utility company agreeing to comply with Sec.
15.of this ordinance; and
(vi) evidence acceptable to the Planner
evidencing ownership of, and encumbrances on, the
property proposed to be platted or ..subdivided,
including, without limitation, a,. written opinion
from the applicant's' counsel addressed to the
City, opining that all documents executed and
delivered by the applicant to the. City have been
duly executed and delivered, have ,been duly
authorized by all necessary., corporate,
partnership or other entity action,. are binding
on. the signing parties and enforceable in
accordance with their terms, and containing such
additional.statements as the Planner may request.
Provided, however, if any one or more of the foregoing
items is not received by the Planner, the Planner may yet
submit his /her supplemental report to the Council, and the
Council may condition its final approval upon the receipt
by the Planner of those items not then so received, as well
as. other matters reasonably related to the purpose and
objectives of this ordinance.
-12-
(2) Upon receipt of the supplementary report of the
Planner, the Council shall act thereon, which action shall
be by resolution. Such resolution shall be passed within
60 days of receipt of such supplemental report of the
Planner. Final approval may be conditioned as ,provided in
(1) of this paragraph (e), and may also be conditioned upon
receipt of the land dedication, - -_ -cash contribution or
security required pursuant to Sec. 11 hereof. If the
Council imposes conditions in any grant of final approval,
then the officers of the City shall not sign such plat, nor
shall the City Clerk issue any certified copy of the
resolution of the Council giving such final approval, until
such conditions are met and complied with. The City Clerk
is authorized, 'once such conditions have been met and
complied with, to issue a certified copy of the resolution
of the Council giving such final approval, without
reference.to such conditions.
(f) Filing of Plat; Certified Copy of Approving Resolution.
(1) The applicant shall file for record the final
plat, at applicant's expense, as soon as possible after
receipt by applicant of a certified copy of the Council
resolution giving final approval of the: plat. Said plat
shall not be filed for record, nor accepted for record,
unless said certified copy of the Council resolution giving
,such final approval _accompanies such plat when presented
for filing of record. A certified copy of such filed plat
with the recording data thereon shall be filed with the
Planner.
(2) If the plat is not filed for- record and a
certified copy thereof filed with the Planner by the first
anniversary date of the Council resolution giving such
final approval (even if such final approval is conditional
on performance of further acts by applicant or others), the
plat or subdivision shall be deemed abandoned and withdrawn
and of no effect, and a new application shall be filed and
the plat or subdivision again submitted for review and
action pursuant to this ordinance.
(3) If the approved plat is of land contiguous to
another municipality, the City Clerk shall also file a copy
of such resolution with the governing body of such
municipality.
(4) The City Clerk shall not give a certified copy of
the resolution approving the plat or subdivision for a
double dwelling unit or a townhouse development until the
requirements of Sec. 8 of this ordinance have been
fulfilled.
-13-
Sec. 11. Land Dedication or Cash Contribution.
(a) A reasonable :portion of any proposed plat or subdivision
shall. be dedicated to the City for public use for streets, roads,
sewer lines, electric lines, gas lines, water lines and facilities,
storm water drainage and holding areas or ponds and similar
utilities and improvements. . The Planner and Engineer shall
recommend to the Council what portion is reasonable, the location
thereof, the need therefor and the use thereof.
(b). Where any plat or subdivision adjoins a natural lake, pond
or stream, including streams which flow only intermittently, a strip
.of land running along all sides thereof which are contiguous to such
lake, pond or stream, which strip shall extend from .a line 100 feet
upland from the lake or pond, as measured from the high water mark,
and 100 feet from the centerline of the stream, shall be either
(i) dedicated to the City for public use, or (ii) subjected to a
perpetual easement in favor of the City over and in said land and
the bed and water body of such lake, pond or stream for the purpose
of protecting the hydraulic efficiency and the natural character and
beauty of such lake, pond or stream. The Commission shall determine
which of these options is more appropriate and shall recommend to
the Council one of said options. In either case, there shall also
then be granted to the City the right of ingress to and egress from
the said strip of land with workmen, equipment and material. Also,
where the easement 'is determined to be in the best interest of the
City, said easement shall also provide that the owners of the areas
as to which such :easement is granted shall not.make, door place any
fill, grading, improvement or development of any kind on or to such
easement area, or raise the level of the easement area in any way,
but all such right to fill, grade, improve and develop, and to raise
the level of the easement area, shall be granted by said easement to
the City.
.(c) In addition to the dedication to be -made pursuant to
paragraphs (a) and (b) in this section, and if the Council
reasonably determines :that. it will- need to acquire a portion of the
land within the plat or subdivision for the purposes stated in this
paragraph (c) as a. result of approval of the plat or subdivision,
then, as. to such plat or subdivision, a reasonable portion of the
land therein shall be dedicated .to the public or preserved for
conservation purposes or for public . use as parks, playgrounds,
trails, wetlands or open space, provided that, at the option of the
City., the owner or. owners shall - contribute to the -City an amount of
cash equal to the fair market value of the land otherwise required
to be so. dedicated or preserved, or dedicate and preserve a part of
such land and contribute the balance of such land value in cash.
Land then set aside and dedicated for public recreational purposes
pursuant to Section 13 (Planned Residential District) of the Zoning
Ordinance may be considered as set aside and dedicated under this
-14-
ordinance to thei extent required hereunder in connection with such
plat or subdivision, but then only to the extent that such land is
in excess of the open space then required by the Zoning Ordinance.
Any money so paid to the City shall be placed in a special-fund and
used only for the acquisition or development of .land for
conservation purposes, parks, playgrounds, trails, wetlands, and
open space. For purposes of this ordinance, "fair market value of
the land is defined as the fair market value of the .land within
such plat or subdivision as of the date the plat or .subdivision is
granted final approval by the Council,, as determined by the City
Assessor.
(1) It is the policy of the City, as a general rule,
to require dedication of:land in the following instances:
(i) if the property to be dedicated is
adjacent to an existing public park or playground
and the additional property will beneficially
expand the park or playground;
1. (11) if the property to be dedicated is six
acres or more in size, or is expected to be
combined with future acquisitions by the City .so
that a public.park with a minimum of six acres
will result;
(iii) if the property to be dedicated abuts
or adjoins a natural lake, pond or stream, or a
wetland then protected by then applicable state
or federal laws or statutes;
(iv) if the property to be dedicated is
necessary or desirable for a .storm. water holding
or ponding area, or is an area which, the City
intends to have dredged or otherwise improved for
storm water holding areas or ponds;
(v) if the property to be dedicated is a
place of significant natural, scenic or historic
value.
Sec. 12. Requirements for Preliminary Plat or Subdivision.
(a) Genera The applicant shall file with the. application
required by Sec. 10 hereof the following .information which is
required for all proposed plats and subdivisions, and which shall be
shown on the proposed plat or subdivision or other accompanying.
document:
(1) The proposed name of the proposed plat or
subdivision.
-15-
(2) The name, address and telephone number of each
owner, each agent of any owner,, each applicant, the
surveyor and the designer of the proposed plat or
subdivision.
(3) A graphic scale (no smaller than 1" = 50'), the
north point and the date of, preparation of. the proposed
plat or subdivision.
(4) The plat or subdivision shall show the perimeter
property. lines of the plat. or subdivision, and the
perimeter lines of each lot,.with bearings and distances.
(5) The lot and block numbers.
(6) The .lot width (as defined by the Zoning
Ordinance), lot depth (as defined by the Zoning. Ordinance)
and square footage of each lot.
(7) Site data, including :total. area, area in lots,
area in streets. and other public uses, by square footage
and percentages for each, and divided into existing and
proposed.
(8) The legal description of the tract to be platted,
together with its PIN number(s).
(9) The existing. zoning claasification(s) of the
property and adjacent property.
(10) Location and size of any proposed outlots, and a
conceptual plan. '(graphically .and in writing) for future
development thereof.
(11). All existing public roads and rights of way
serving the property, including the grade, width, legally
established :centerline elevation, and the location and
elevation of.sidewalks.
{12:) All.proposed public roads and rights of way.
(13) Existing easement locations, widths and purposes,
and showing invert elevation of sewers:
(14) Proposed easement locations, widths and purposes.
(15) Location of existing and proposed utilities,
including distance to nearest utilities not on or adjoining
the property, and showing the invert elevation of sewers.
-16-
(16) Existing elevations.. and contours at 2 foot
intervals and a preliminary grading plan.showing resulting
elevations and contours at 2 foot intervals.
(17) Minimum front, rear and. side setbacks for the
proposed improvements on the proposed lots.
(18) Location of all wetlands, streams, ponds or lakes
within or flowing through the property proposed to be
platted or subdivided with normal high water and 100 year
flood elevations.
(19.) Location of all proposed parks, drainage
facilities and areas proposed to be dedicated. for public
use.
.(20) Ground elevation of land .within 100 feet of the
perimeter property lines -of the.area proposed to be platted
or.subdivided, showing contour lines at 2 foot intervals.
(21) If the land proposed to be . platted or 'subdivided
is within the Flood Plain as determined by the Zoning
Ordinance, the location and elevation of the Flood Plan
shall be shown.
(22) The mean grade of the front and rear lines of
each proposed lot.
(23) The land area, by total. square footage and by
percentage of all land in the proposed plat or subdivision,
to be disturbed in the subdivision by. public and private
improvements, and'the location.of such disturbed areas.
(24) The location and. elevation of all existing
improvements on = the land in the proposed plat or
subdivision and a statement as to whether they will remain
or be removed.
(25) A ,graphic illustrating the then existing
topography for all lots in the proposed plat or subdivision
and showing the location of all areas with slopes of
greater than 18%, and the- percentage of such areas relative
to the total area in tste proposed plat or subdivision, and
the percentage of each lot having slopes of 18% or greater.
(26) The number of overstory trees then existing on
the property proposed to be disturbed by public or private
improvements, and their location, having a diameter of 6
inches or more as to deciduous trees, and having a height
of 6 feet or more as to coniferous trees.
-17-
(b) Additional Requirements for Platting or Subdivision of
Property in the Single Dwelling Unit District.
In addition. to the requirements at subparagraph .(a) of this
section, the applicant for a proposed plat or subdivision of land
wholly or partially within the Single Dwelling Unit District as then
determined by the Zoning Ordinance shall also deliver to the Planner
the following information from a source acceptable to the Planner:
(1) A complete list of..all ots and the owners
thereof,Nhich areNvithin the neighborhood of the property
proposed to.be.platted or subdivided.k.
(2) Relative. to the properties included in (1) above
in this subparagraph:
(i) the square footage for each lot in such
hadsj borhood;
(ii) the mean average and median lot area
w(in square feet) of all lots in such neighborhood:
.(iii) . the lot width, 'as defined by the Zoning
Ordinance, for each lot in such neighborhood:
iv the mean average and median lot width,
as defined by the Zoning Ordinance, nof all lots
in such neighborhood:
the lot depth, as defined by the Zoning
Ordinance, for each lot in such neighborhood: and
vi the mean average and media lot depth,
as defined by the Zoning Ordinance, of all lots
in such neighborhood.
(3) The location of the proposed building pad for
each lot in the proposed plat or subdivision.
(4) The lot width to perimeter ratio .(as defined in
the Zoning 'Ordinance) for each lot in the proposed plat or
subdivision.
Sec. 13. Requirements for. Final Plat or Subdivision. If the
Council grants preliminary approval of a proposed plat or
subdivision, the applicant shall prepare and deliver to the Planner:
'(l) two mylar or linen reproducible tracings and two mounted copies
of the proposed plat in its final form, .complying with the
requirements of this ordinance, the preliminary approval granted by
the Council, and Chapter 505 of Minnesota Statutes; and (2) evidence
satisfactory to the Planner that the final plat has been reviewed
and approved by the Hennepin County Surveyor's office.
-18-
Sec. 14. . Guidelines and Criteria for Evaluating Plats and
Subdivision; Review of Requirements.
(a) The Commission in reviewing proposed plats and subdivisions
and in determining its recommendation to the Council, and the
Council in determining whether to approve or disapprove of any plat
or subdivision, may consider, among other matters, the following:
(1) The impact of the proposed plat or subdivision,
and proposed development thereof, on the character and
symmetry of the neighborhood as evidenced and indicated by,
but not limited to, the following matters:
(i) The suitability of the size and shape
of the lots in the :proposed plat or subdivision
relative to the size and shape of lots in the
neighborhood.; and
(ii) The compatibility of the size, shape,
location and arrangement of the lots in the
proposed plat or subdivision with the proposed
density and intended use of the site and the
density and use of lots in the neighborhood.
(2) The impact of the proposed..plat or subdivision,
and. proposed development thereof, on thel environment,
including but not limited to, _topography, steep slopes,
.vegetation,. naturally occurring, lakes, ponds and streams,
susceptibility of, the site to .erosion and sedimentation,
susceptibility of the site to flooding and water storage
.needs.on and from the site.
(3) The consistency of the proposed plat or
subdivision, and. proposed.. development. thereof, and
compliance by the proposed plat or:. subdivision, and the
proposed. development, with the policies, objectives and
goals of the Comprehensive Plan.
(4) The :compliance of. the proposed plat or
subdivision, and the proposed development thereof, with the
policies, objectives, goals and requirements of the Zoning
Ordinance including, without limitation, the lot size
provisions and the Flood Plain Overlay District provisions
of the'Zoning Ordinance.
(5) The impact of the proposed plat or subdivision,
and proposed development thereof, on the health, safety and
general welfare of the public.
(6) The relationship of the design of the site, or
the improvements proposed therefor, and the conflict of
-19-
such design. or improvements, with any easements of record
or on the ground.
(7) The relationship of lots in the proposed plat or
subdivision to existing streets and the adequacy and safety
of ingress to and egress from such lots from and to
existing streets.
(8) The adequacy of streets in the proposed plat or
subdivision, and the conformity thereof with existing and
planned streets and highways in surrounding areas.
(9) The suitability of street grades in relation to
the grades of lots and existing or future extension of the
City's water and storm and-sanitary sewer systems.
(10) The adequacy and availability of access by
police, fire, ambulance and other life safety vehicles to
all proposed improvements to be developed on the proposed
plat or subdivision.
(11) Whether the physical characteristics of the
property, including, without limitation, topography,
vegetation, susceptibility to erosion or siltation,
susceptibility to flooding, use as a natural recovery and
ponding area for storm water, and potential disturbance of
slopes with a grade of 18% or more, are such that the
property is not suitable for the .type of development or use
proposed.
(12) Whether development within -the proposed plat or
subdivision will cause the disturbance. of more than 25% of
the total area in such plat. or subdivision containing
slopes exceeding 18%.
13
( ) Whether.the proposed plat or subdivision, or the
improvements proposed to be placed thereon, are likely to
cause substantial environmental damage.
(b) If the proposed plat is wholly or partially within the
Single Dwelling Unit District, then the minimum lot area, lot width,
lot depth and lot width to perimeter ratio shall be as follows:
(1) If the medirai lot area of lots in the
neighborhood is greater than 9,000 square feet, then the
minimum lot area of any lot in the proposed plat or
subdivision shall not be less than the median lot area of
lots in the neighborhood.
(2) If the median lot width, as defined by the Zoning
Ordinance, of lots in the neighborhood is greater than 75
feet, then the minimum lot width, as defined by the Zoning
-20-
� e
Ordinance, of any lot in the proposed plat or subdivision
shall not be less than the median lot width of lots in the
neighborhood.
(3) If the median lot depth, as defined by the Zoning
Ordinance, of lots in the neighborhood is greater than 120
feet, then the minimum lot depth, as defined by the Zoning
Ordinance, of any -lot in the proposed plat or subdivision
shall not be less than the median lot depth of lots in the
neighborhood.
(4) The lot width to perimeter ratio (as defined in
the Zoning Ordinance) for any lot in the proposed plat or
subdivision shall not be less than 0.1.
(c) Nn addition to the foregoing matters, the Commission, in
connect on with its recommendation to the Council, and the Council
in determining whether to approve or disapprove a proposed plat or
subdivision, shall specifically and especially consider the
following matters:
(1) Whether the proposed plat or subdivisions
with the policies, objectives and goals of the
Comprehensive Plan.
(2) Whether the proposed plat or subdivision com lies
with the policies, objectives, goals kand requirements of
the Zoning Ordinance, including, without limitation, the
lot size and dimension- requirements of the Zoning
Ordinance, and the Flood Plain Overlay District and
Heritage Preservation Overlay District of the Zoning
Ordinance, as varied by variances therefrom, if any,
granted pursuant to the Zoning Ordinance.
(3) K.ðer the design of the proposed plat or
subdivision, or the design or type of improvements proposed
to be placed thereon, may be detrimental to the health,
safety or general welfare of the public.
(4) they the proposed plat or subdivision conforms
to, and Acomo with the requirements of, applicable state
law.
(5j� Whether the proposed plat or subdivision com lies
with the policies, objectives, goals and requirements of
this ordinance, as varied by variances therefrom, if any,
granted - pursuant to this ordinance.
Sec. 15. Utilities.
(a) Underground Installation of Utilities. All new utilities
(excluding main line electric feeders and high voltage transmission
-21-
lines) constructed within the confines of and providing service to
customers in the plat shall be installed underground.
(b) In Public Easements. All electric and gas distribution
lines and piping, roadways, curbs, walks and other similar
improvements shall be constructed only on .a street, alley or other
public way or easement which is designated on a plat or subdivision
approved by the Council pursuant hereto, or which has otherwise been
approved by the Council.
Sec. 16, Street Maintenance. Until a street in a plat or
subdivision has been completed in accordance with the plans and
specifications approved by the City, and the Engineer has certified
as to such completion, the owner shall keep such street, if used for
public travel, in a safe condition for such use, at his /her own
expense. The City shall not be chargeable with the cost of or the
responsibility for the, maintenance of such street until the
completion of such street has been so certified.
Sec. 17. Penalty.
(a) Any person who shall violate any provision of this
ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to penalties
pursuant to City Ordinance No. 175.
(b) Also any person who conveys a lot, tract or parcel in
violation of Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.358, Subd. 4b (which is
hereby incorporated herein by reference) shall forfeit and pay to
the City a penalty of not less than $100.00 for each lot, tract or
parcel so conveyed. Also, the City may enjoin such conveyance, or
recover such penalty, by a civil action in a court of competent
jurisdiction.
(c) The person violating this ordinance, or said Section
462.358, Subd. 4b, shall also pay all costs incurred by the City in
enforcing this ordinance or prosecuting such .violation, including
reasonable attorneys' fees.
Sec. 18, Repealer. Ordinance No. 801 is hereby repealed in its
entirety.
Sec. 19, Effective Date; Filing. This ordinance shall be in
full force and effect upon its adoption and publication and, when
effective, shall be filed with the office of the County Recorder,
Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Mayor
Attest:
Clerk
-22-
I Y1" N t O
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Published in the Edina Sun on
Filed in County Recorder's Office on
Document No.
-23-
, as
.w
M '
29558
ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A30
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 825 TO
REQUIRE LARGER MINIMUM LOT AREAS AND DIMENSIONS
FOR CERTAIN LOTS IN THE SINGLE DWELLING
UNIT DISTRICT (R -1)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Subparagraph 1(a) of paragraph E of Section 11
(Single.Dwelling Unit District (R -1)) of Ordinance No. 825 is hereby
amended to read as follows:
(a) single dwelling unit
building
9,000 square feet;
provided, however,
if the lot is in a
plat or subdivision
approved pursuant
to Ordinance No.
804 of the City,
then the minimum
lot area shall be
the same as
determined for lots
in such plat or
subdivision
pursuant to said
ordinance if
greater than 9,000
square feet.
Sec. 2. Subparagraph 2 of paragraph E of Section 11 (Single
Dwelling Unit District (R -1)) of Ordinance No. 825 is hereby amended
to read as follows:
2. Minimum Lot Width.
Single dwelling unit
building
-1-
75 feet; provided,
however, if the
lot is in a plat or
subdivision
approved pursuant
to Ordinance No.
804 of the City,
then the minimum
lot width shall be
the same as
determined for lots
in such plat or
7,--,�
subdivision
pursuant to said
ordinance if
greater than 75
feet.
Sec. 3. Subparagraph 3 of paragraph E of Section 11 (Single
Dwelling Unit District (R -1)) of Ordinance No. 825 is hereby amended
to read as follows:
2. Minimum Lot Depth.
Single dwelling unit 120 feet; provided,
building however, if the
lot is in a plat or
subdivision
approved pursuant
.to Ordinance No.
804 of the City,
then the minimum
lot depth shall be
the same as
determined for lots
in such plat or
subdivision
pursuant to said
ordinance if
greater than 120
feet.
Sec. 4. There is hereby added to paragraph E of Section 11
(Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1)) of Ordinance No. 825 a new
subparagraph 4 as follows:
1'4. Minimum Lot Width to Perimeter Ratio. Each lot shall have
a lot width to perimeter ratio of not less than 0.1."
Sec. 5. There is hereby added to paragraph D (Definitions) of
Section 3 of Ordinance No. 825, and inserted in the proper
alphabetical order in said paragraph D, the following additional
definition:
"Lot Width to Perimeter Ratio: the quantity resulting from
dividing the lot width by the total lineal feet in the perimeter
of that lot.
Sec. 6. Subparagraph 3 of Paragraph T. of Section 7 of
Ordinance No. 825 is hereby amended to read as follows:
113. Non - Conforming Lots. A non - conforming lot in the R -1
District used or intended for a single dwelling unit building
-2-
N A
shall be exempt from the width, depth, area and lot width to
perimeter ratio requirements of this ordinance, provided, that
said lot:
(a) is not less than 50 feet in width;
(b) is not less than 100 feet in depth;
(c) has at least 30 feet frontage on a street; and
(d) is not at the effective date of this ordinance,
or is not at any time subsequent to such effective date,
and has not been at any time since October 22, 1951, held
in common ownership with all or part of an adjoining lot or
parcel which, together, comply with the minimum width,
depth, area and lot width to perimeter ratio requirements
imposed by this ordinance.
A non - conforming lot held as of, or at any time subsequent to,
the effective date of this ordinance, or at any time since
October 22, 1951, in common ownership with all or part of an
adjoining parcel or lot which together comply with the
requirements of (a), (b) and (c) above, shall not be decreased
in size."
Sec. 7. This ordinance shall be in effect upon its passage and
publication.
Attest:
Clerk
First Heading:
Second Heading:
Published in the Edina Sun on
-3-
Mayor
0
-rte
350 PARK AVENUE
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10002
(212) 415 -9200
1330 CONNECTICUT AVENUE, N. W.
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20036
(202) 857 -0700
3 ORACECHURCH STREET
LONDON RC3V OAT, ENGLAND
_01 -929 -3334
36, RUE TRONCHET
75009 PARIS, PRANCE
0I- 4266 -59 -49
FAR-EAST FINANCE CENTER
HONG KONG
852 -5- 6612555
DOI3SEY & WHITNEY
A PasrSa —s INCLQ ING PS "SS,ON.• COHW6 T—S
2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
(612) 340-2600
TELEX 29 -0605
PAX (612)3.10 -2868
Ms. Marcella Daehn
City Clerk
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Marc:
THOMAS S. ERICKSON, P. A.
(612) 040 -2659
November 28, 1989
Re: Subdivision Ordinance
340 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 55903
(507) 286 -3156
315 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391
(612)475-0373
1200 FIRST INTERSTATE CENTER
BILLINGS, MONTANA 59103
_..(406)252 -3800
201 DAVIDSON BUILDING
GREAT PALLS, MONTANA 59401
(406)727 -3632
127 EAST FRONT STREET
MISSOULA, MONTANA 59802
(406) 721 -6025
I enclose herewith a one page letter to be sent to the
Council Members in their packets marked CONFIDENTIAL and a longer
opinion letter which should also be sent to the Council Members
in their packets. The latter letter has also been forwarded to
Mike Bolen and to Peter Beck as requested by the Council.
I believe Craig Larsen has additional information to
go to the Council, including the ordinance itself and an
accompanying amendment to the zoning ordinance (Ordinance A25 -A30).
If you have any questions please advise.
Very truly yours,
�
Tho as S. Erickson
TSE:lmw
Enclosures
cc: Craig Larsen, City Planner, City of Edina (w /encls.)
Agenda Item III.A.1 & 2
350 PARK AVENUE
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022
(212)415 -9200
1330 CONNECTICUT AVENUE, N. W.
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20036
(202) 857-0700
3. ORACECHURCH STREET
LONDON EC3V OAT, ENGLAND
01-929 -3334
36, RUE TRONCHET
75009 PARIS, FRANCE
0I- 42- 66 -59 -49
FAR EAST FINANCE CENTER
MONO KONG
852 -5- 8612555
DOI3SEY & WHITNEY
A PA@TN ns- INCLUDING P-SSI- CORMI -TIONS
2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
(612) 340-2600
TELEX 29 -0605
FAX (612) 840 -21168
THOMAS S. ERICKSON, P. A.
(612) 340 -2669
November 27, 1989
CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION
BETWEEN ATTORNEY AND CLIENT
Honorable Members of City Council
of City of Edina; and
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Members-of the City Council and Mr. Rosland:
340 FIRST NATIONAL RANK BUILDINO
ROCHESTER, MINNBSOTA 55903
(507) 288 -3156
315 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391
(612)475 -0373
1200 FIRST INTERSTATE CENTER
BILLINGS, MONTANA 59103
. - (406)252 -3800. .
201 DAVIDSON BUILDING
GREAT PALLS, MONTANA 59401
(406)727 -3632
127 EAST FRONT STREET
MISSOULA, MONTANA 69802
(406) 721 -6025
Attached is a letter addressed to the City Council, with
copies going,to Michael Bolen and Peter K. Beck (as requested by
the Council), in which I respond to objections regarding proposed
Ordinance No. 804 raised in the letter from Mr. Beck to the City
Council dated November 20, 1989. Please note that I drafted the
attached letter in an adverserial style to rebut Mr. Beck's
arguments. As a result, the attached letter does not discuss the
potential shortcomings of the proposed ordinance. Although I
believe the arguments that I make in the attached letter would
prevail in court against Mr. Beck's arguments, there is of course
no guarantee that a court would not rule against the City.
Because the attached letter is being sent to Mr. Bolen
and Mr. Beck, it cannot be treated as a confidential communication.
I suggest that this,letter, however, be treated as a privileged
and confidential communication between.attorney and client and,
therefore not be released to the public.
If you have any further questions on this matter, please
call me.
Very truly yours,
Thomas S. Erickson
TSE:lmw
Enclosure
i
JAMES P. LARKIN
ROBERT L. HOFFMAN
JACK F. DALY
D. KENNETH LI NDGREN
WENDELL R. ANDERSON
GERALD H. FRIEDELL
ALLAN E. MULLIGAN
OBERT J. HENNESSEY
AMES C. ERICKSON
.DWARD J. DRISCOLL
JAMES P. MILEY
GENE N. FULLER
DAVID C. SELLERGREN
RICHARD J. KEENAN
JOHN D. FULLMER
ROBERT E. BOY LE
FRANK I. HARVEY
CHARLES S. MODELL
CHRISTOPHER J. DIETZEN
JOHN R. BEATTIE
LINDA H. FISHER
THOMAS P. STOLTMAN
STEVEN G. LEVIN
FORREST D. NOWLIN
MICHAEL C. JACKMAN
JOHN E. DI EHL
JON S. 5WIERZEWSKI
THOMAS J. FLYNN
JAMES P. OUINN
TODD I. FREEMAN
STEPHEN S. SOLOMON
PETER K. BECK
JEROME H. KAHNKE
SHERRILL OMAN KURETICH
GERALD L. BECK
JOHN B. LUNDOUIST
DAYLE NOLAN-
THOMAS B. HUMPHREY, JR.
November 30, 1989
LAI?KIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1500 NORTHWESTERN FINANCIAL CENTER
2000 PIPER JAFFRAY TOWER
7900 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH
222 SOUTH NINTH STREET
BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
TELEPHONE 16121 83S -3800
TELEPHONE (6121338-6610
FAX 16121 896 -3333
FAX 16121 336 -9760
Edina City Council
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
NORTH SUBURBAN OFFICE
8990 SPRINGBROOK DRIVE, SUITE 250
COON RAPIDS, MINNESOTA 55433
TELEPHONE (6121786-7117
FAX 16121 786 -6711
Reply to Bloomington
Re: Proposed Ordinance No. 804 and
Related Zoning Ordinance Amendments
Dear Council Members:
DAVID J. PEAT
MICHAEL T. MCKIM
CHARLES R. WEAVER
HERMAN L. TALLE
VINCENT G. ELLA
ANDREW J. MITCHELL
JOHN A. COTTER
BEATRICE A. ROTHWEILER
PAUL B. PLUNKETT
ALAN L. KILDOW
KATHLEEN M. PICOTTE NEWMAN
MICHAEL B. LE BARON
FRANCIS E. GIBERSON
TRACY R. EICHHORN-HICKS-
AMY DARR GRADY
CATHERINE BARNETT WILSON-
JEFFREY C. ANDERSON
DANIEL L. BOWLES
TODD M. VLATKOVICH
TIMOTHY J. MCMANUS
GREGORY E. KORSTAD
LISA A. GRAY
"' -"- GARY A. RENNEKE
THOMAS H. WEAVER
SHANNON K. MCCAMBRIDGE
MICHAEL S. COH EN
DENISE M. NORTON
GARY A. VAN CLEVE
MICHAEL B. BRAMAN
JOSEPH W. DICKER
JA COUELINE F. DIETZ
GAYLEN L. KNACK
RODNEY D. IVES
JULIE A. WRASE
CHRISTOPHER J. HARRISTHAL
SHARON L. BRENNA
MARIKAY CANAGA LITZAU
TIMOTHY J. KEANE
JON R. NORBERG
WILLIAM C. GRIFFITH
THEODORE A. MONDALE
JOHN J. STEFFENHAGEN
DANIEL W. VOSS
OF COUNSEL
JOSEPH GITIS
RICHARD A. NORDBYE
'M L50 ADMITTED IN
WISCONSIN
This__ letter._ is written in response to the November 27, 1989, letter to
the Council from the City Attorney with respect to proposed Ordinance.
No. 804 and related zoning ordinance amendments (the Proposed
Ordinances). We will address the following issues raised by the
Proposed Ordinances and the City Attorney's letter.
Uniformity Issues.
The City Attorney quotes Minnesota Statutes Section 462.357, Subd. 1,
which provides that zoning regulations:
"shall be uniform for each class or kind of buildings,
structures, or land and for each class or kind of use
throughout such district, but the regulations in one
district may differ from those in other districts ".
The Proposed Ordinances violate this statutory uniformity requirement
because they impose different zoning regulations and requirements
(minimum lot sizes) within the same zoning district. It-is true that
the Zoning Ordinance may impose different requirements in different
zoning districts. However, within the same zoning district the zoning
requirements, including minimum lot sizes, must be the same. If they
are not, the uniformity requirement of state law is violated..
411
LAIRKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGBEN, LTD.
Edina City Council
November 30, 1989
Page 2
The statutory uniformity requirement does not refer to "similarly
situated" properties. The statutory requirement is that zoning
requirements be uniform for each class or kind of use in the same
zoning district. All single family properties in the single family
zoning district must be treated uniformly. The proposed ordinances,
because they impose different requirements on different single family
properties within the same zoning district, violate this uniformity
requirement.
The City Attorney states that, "the law requires that zoning
regulations provide like treatment to similarly situated properties.
If two lots are in different "neighborhoods" that are composed of
different size lots, they would not be similarly situated, even if the
two lots are on the same street." This.analysis is flawed in two
respects. First, the statute does not refer to "similarly situated"
properties. The statute requires that each class or kind of use in a
zoning district be treated uniformly. The law does not allow
distinctions within the same class of use in the same zoning district
based on lot sizes.
Second, the City Attorney's argument that two lots in different
"neighborhoods" are not similarly situated, even if on the same
street, is completely untenable. Under the Proposed Ordinances, every
lot in,the City has a different "neighborhood ". Therefore, under the
City Attorney's_analysis, there are no-two "similarly situated" lots
in the entire City. - -This analysis would read the uniformity
requirement right out of the law and would not, of course, be accepted
by the courts.
The requirement that "similarly situated" properties be treated
uniformly has arisen out of case law. The Minnesota Supreme Court
first used this term in the case of Northwestern College v. City of
Arden Hills, 281 N.W.2d 865 (1979). In that case, the Minnesota
Supreme Court ordered the City of Arden Hills to issue a building
permit to Northwestern College on the grounds that the City had issued
a similar permit to Bethel College. Both colleges were located in the
residential zoning district, but on different properties. The Supreme
Court held, "A zoning ordinance must operate uniformly on those
similarly situated" and "The.disparate treatment of Northwestern and
Bethel is constitutionally impermissible ". 281 N.W.2d 865, 869. The
successful attorney for Northwestern College was the present Edina
City Attorney. The City Attorney's argument in this instance, that
two lots in the same zoning district are not similarly situated unless
"of the same size and neighborhoods with lots of the same size" is
patently inconsistent with the Supreme Court's decision in the
Northwestern College case.
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGBEN, LTD.
Edina City Council
November 30, 1989
Page 3
The point is that residential uses and properties in the same
residential zoning district are similarly situated and must be treated
uniformly, as a matter of constitutional as well as statutory law. It
is not permissible to create floating subdistricts ( "neighborhoods ")
within the same zoning district in order to impose different zoning
requirements.
Furthermore, zoning district boundaries must be fixed and certain.
The Minnesota Supreme Court has'so stated in.Olson v. City of Hopkins,
149 N.W.2d 394 at 398 (1967):
It is a fundamental rule that in establishing boundaries of
use districts they must be fixed and expressed with
sufficient certainty so that an owner can ascertain the
restrictions imposed by reference to the Zoning Ordinance
without resort to extrinsic proof. (Emphasis added)
This means that a property owner must be able to walk into city hall,
pick up a.zoning ordinance and map, and walk out knowing the
restrictions placed on his property. Under the Proposed Ordinances., a
property owner must survey or otherwise obtain the dimensions of
hundreds of properties surrounding his own property in order to
determine the dimensional requirements that apply to his property.
This - information is extrinsic proof, and as such is impermissible
under the rule set forth by the Supreme Court in Olson v. City of
Hopkins. See also Minnesota Department of Natural Resources v. City
of Waterville, 354 N.W.2d 544 (Minn. App. 19.84),. A property owner
must be able to ascertain the restrictions which apply to.fiis property
by reference to the zoning ordinance alone. This will-not be possible
for.single family homeowners in the City of Edina if the Proposed
Ordinances are adopted.
Municipal zoning ordinances which.affect interests-in real property
are authorized only by virtue of an exercise of the police power of a
municipality, and must be in the interest of public health, safety, or
welfare. Pearce v. Village of Edina, 118 N.W.2d 659, 670 (Minn.
1962). (See also Hawkins v. Talbot, 80 N.W.2d.863 (Minn. 1957); K' es
v. City of St. Paul, 62 N.W.2d 363 (Minn. 1953). They are invalid
where they bear no relationship to such public interest, Gunderson v.
Anderson, 251 N.W. 515 (Minn. 1933); or where it is established that
they are discriminatory as applied to a particular situation. State
v. Northwestern Preparatory School, Inc., 37 N.W.2d 370 (Minn. 1949);
See State v United Packing Stations, Inc., 50 N.W.2d 50, 53 (Minn.
1951).; 29 A.L.R. 2d 852.)
While it is true that municipalities are accorded wide discretion in
the adoption of zoning ordinances, the Minnesota Supreme Court has
LAIRKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD.
Edina City Council
November 30, 1989
Page 4
stated that where a particular zoning classification "is arbitrary and
discriminatory insofar as it relates to different property owners
affected by it, the court should not hesitate to invalidate the
classification on constitutional grounds" (Perron v. Village of New
Brighton, 145 N.W.2d "426 429 (1966), quoting from Pierce v. Village
of Edina, 118 N.W.2d 659 (1962).
Purposes of the Proposed Ordinances
The City Attorney has set forth a number of "purpose and objectives"
of the Proposed Ordinances. However, we have heard no discussion of
these purposes at the City Council hearings on the Proposed
Ordinances. The.evidence before the City, in the form of staff
reports, is that the present subdivision ordinances have produced
sound results. There has been no testimony from the public as to the
need for the Proposed Ordinances. The only testimony has been from
opponents to Mr. Utne's subdivision whose agenda is clearly limited to
the adoption of an ordinance which will prohibit Mr. Utne's proposed
lot split.
There has.been much discussion in the .city council hearings and in the
City Attorney's letter regarding the goal of "preserving.the character
and symmetry -of the.neighborhood The City Attorney attempts to link
this concern to the protection of the property:values and stability of
neighborhoods. However, there is no evidence before the City Council
that neighborhoods with varying lot sizes have lower property values
or stability than neighborhoods with more uniform lot sizes. As we
have stated before, aesthetic considerations are not a sufficient
basis for the Proposed Ordinances. Odell v. City of Eagan, 348 N.W.2d
792 (Minn. App. 1984); See White Bear Docking and Storage, Inc v .
City of White Bear Lake, 324 N.W.2d at 177 -78 (Minn. 1982). Municipal -
zoning ordinances are invalid if enacted primarily in adherence to
aesthetic concepts. Pierce v. Village of Edina, 118 N.W.2d 659 (Minn.
1962); Olson v. City of Minneapolis, 115 N.W.2d 734 (Minn. 1962). We
have seen no credible evidence of any purpose behind the proposed
ordinances other than aesthetics and an attempt to exclude new
residences from existing neighborhoods.
The City Attorney asserts that the Proposed Ordinances incorporate, "a
greater level of specificity and objectivity in the city's subdivision
regulations ". This is not the case. The Proposed Ordinances will be
in addition to the current subdivision standards. All of the
subjective standards currently in the subdivision ordinance will
remain. The only difference will be that most large single family
lots currently existing in the City will no longer be able to be
split.
LABKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LIIVDCRE \', LTD.
Edina City Council
November 30, 1989
Page 5
If the City Attorney is saying that under the Proposed Ordinances
subdivisions which comply with the new dimensional requirements will
be automatically approved, the Proposed Ordinances should specifically
so state and the numerous subjective standards replaced with the new
objective lot area requirements. If this is not the case, the
Proposed Ordinances.will not in any way increase specificity,
objectivity or certainty. The only impact will be to eliminate the
possibility of subdivision for most large single family lots in the
City including, in all likelihood, Mr. Utne's.
The City Attorney also states that "large lot subdivisions are not
promoted by the Proposed Ordinances. This is also completely
incorrect. The Proposed Ordinances provide that no new lot can be
smaller than half of the existing lots in the "neighborhood ". The
Proposed Ordinances will eliminate most lot splits and, even where a
split is allowed, new lots can be no smaller than half the existing
lots in their surrounding "neighborhood ", even if this means that they
must be several times larger than the minimum lot requirement
applicable to all other properties in the single family zoning
.- district. The Proposed Ordinances cannot possibly result in anything
but larger lot subdivisions.
The entire purpose of the Proposed Ordinances is to prohibit the
subdivision of large lots and to stop the clock on any further infill
development in the City of Edina. If the restrictions had been in
effect when the City of-Edina was made up of a number of large farms,
those farms would be the only properties in the City of Edina today.
Fortunately for the current residents of Edina,:the City Council's
predecessors did not take such an ill- advised action. The current
City Council, for the benefit of the existing and future residents of
Edina, should not do so at this time.
Taking Issues
Mr. Utne purchased his property with the intent of splitting it into
two lots. If the Proposed Ordinances prohibit this lot split, they
will have taken Mr. Utne's second lot.. It will have no value, as it
will not be permitted to exist.
We say "if ", because we simply do not know whether the Proposed
Ordinances will or will not prohibit Mr. Utne's proposed lot split.
The City Attorney states that the information which would enable us to
determine whether Mr. Utne's lot split will be permitted, "is readily
available in the city or county records, and collection of that
information does not require any field work or special expertise, only
time and patience ". If the City Attorney knows where we can "readily"
obtain (1) the "horizontal distance between side lot lines measured at
LAIRKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGIAEN, LTD.
Edina City Council
November 30, 1989
Page 6
right angles to the line establishing the lot depth at a point of 50
feet from the front lot'line "; and (2) the "horizontal distance
between the mid -point of the front lot line and the mid -point of the
rear lot line "; and (3) the "area within the lot lines exclusive of
land located below the ordinary high water elevation of lakes, ponds
and streams ", for every lot within 1,000 feet of Mr._Utne's property,
we would like to know where it is. We have asked the City for several
months now to advise us as to where this information is "readily
available ", and have yet to receive an answer. We assume that if it
was'as "readily available" as the City Attorney would have you
believe, we would have received an answer by this time.
The City Attorney states that Mr. Utne knew,.or should have known,
when he purchased his property that any proposed subdivision would be
subject to municipal regulations and restrictions. Of course Mr. Utne
'knew that the property was subject to the city's zoning and
subdivision ordinances. He checked those ordinances and found that
his property was approximately four times the minimum lot size. We do
not believe a court will impute to Mr. Utne the knowledge.that the
City would subsequently adopt an ordinance which more than doubles the
minimum lot size for his property, while not changing the requirements
for surrounding properties:in the-same zoning district.
Nowhere in,the City Attorney's letter is there a case cited which
holds that a zoning ordinance which establishes different lot area and
size requirements for identical uses in the same zoning district is
constitutional. The City Attorney has made a valiant attempt to
defend the Proposed Ordinances. However, the Proposed Ordinances do
not treat similarly situated properties uniformly; they impose
different zoning requirements on.properties used for the same purposes
in the same zoning district; and, in all likelihood, they take Mr.
Utne's second lot from him without compensation. The ordinances
violate state law and the federal and state constitutions.
V truly urs,
Peter K. Beck, for
Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd.
kw
cc: Steve Utne
PKB:FD5S
i'
o e
Cn
Alillp
less
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
Kenneth Rosland
Agenda Item #
III.
'B.
From:
Craig Larsen
Consent
❑
-
Information Only
❑
Date:
December 4, 1989
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
Request by American
U1
To Council
Legion to locate.-in the
PC -1 Zoning District
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
0
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Info /Background:
Second reading of the Ordinance Amendment failed for lack of a motion at the
November 6, 1989, Council meeting.
The American Legion requested that the Council reconsider and grant second
reading to the amendment.
r I r:,.
November 28, 1989
Edina City Council
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
RE: Occupancy of 7070 Amundson Ave.
Dear Council Members:
We request permission for use of the space at
7070 Amundson Ave., Edina, MN. This space would be
used by the members of the Edina American Legion Club.
Sincerely,
Edina American Legion Club.
ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A32
AN ORDINANCE AKENDING ORDINANCE NO. 825
TO ALLOW PRIVATE CLUBS IN THE PLANNED COMMCIAL DISTRICT (PC -1)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 16.(B) of Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by
adding the following principal use:
"53. Clubs, lodge halls and meeting rooms, offices and other facilities
for non - profit organizations not exceeding 2,500 square feet of
gross floor area."
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and
publication.
First Reading: October 16, 1988
Second Reading:
Published in the Edina Sun - Current on
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor ,
ma"',
E®I NA
,il WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
612 - 927 -8861
November 29, 1989
Edina American Legion
Post 471
5115 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55436
Dear Sirs:
As you are aware on November 6, 1989, the City. Council considered,.but did not
approve a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to allow you to relocate to 7070 Cahill
Road.. I informed, Bill Mellin of Kenny's Properties, who I understand to be
your agent, of the City Council action. Pursuant to your letter I have placed
your request that the Council reconsider its action on the agenda for the
December 4, 1989, meeting. You may wish to be represented at that meeting.
As it stands now you may only relocate to a property zoned PC -2 or PC -3, Planned
Commercial District. All properties in the Cahill- Amundson Commercial area,
including 5437 West 70th Street, are zoned PC -1; which does not allow Private
Clubs, such as yours.
If.you now or in the future - consider other locations in the City, check with the
Planning Department to verify the correct zoning: Also, be advised that
leasehold.improvements are subject to receipt of a building permit.
Sincrely,
n
Craig Larsen
City Planner
CL /jh
o e
ch
O
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis Hoffman
City Engineer
Date: 4 December, 1989
Subject: ,Ordinance Change
Regarding Regulation
of Use of Municipal
Parking Facilities
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
1V.A.
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
0
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
.Resolution
0
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Adopt first reading of amended ordinance and waive second reading if Council
so desires.
Info /Background:
Ordinance No. 1232 needs�to be restructured and amended to include addi-
tional ramps within City jurisdiction, i.e., Jerry's Ramp and Edinborough
Ramp. Original ordinance covered the regulation of use of any municipal
parking facility but too narrowly defined parking ramps.
The proposed changes are attached and deletions to the ordinance are shown
as dashed lines and underlined sections indicate changed or new wording
being added to the ordinance.
Additionally, the ordinance change reflects the changing fee structure which
is now handled under Ordinance No. 171.
This ordinance change makes possible the enforcement of parking restrictions
that Council approved for Jerry's Ramp which limits parking hours to three
hours in specified areas.
(Deletions are marked - - - - -- Additions are underlined)
7
ORDINANCE NO. 1232
AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE USE OF
MUNICIPAL PARKING FACILITIES AND PROVIDING
A PENALTY AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 1231
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Hours of Parking Limited. No person shall park any vehicle in
any municipal parking facility for a period in excess of the time limits, as
established pursuant hereto, during business hours. Persons may park in any
municipal parking facility for any length of time during non - business hours,
except for such times as parking may be prohibited for snow removal, repairs, and
like purposes.
Section 2. Definitions. As used in this ordinance:
(a) Municipal parking facility shall mean any lot or ramp, and the lanes
giving ingress thereto and egress therefrom, and all accessories thereof, owned or
operated by the City of Edina or the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina,
Minnesota, herein called "H.R.A. ", and made available to the public for parking of
private motor vehicles, whether for a fee or at no cost. It shall not include
parking spaces located along public streets and highways.
(b)- Ramps- shall -mean- the- twe- ffixaieipal- parking - €aeil €ties- leeated -in- the -Sotk
&- Fraaee- Gemmereial- Area;- ene- Nerth- a € -SAtk- Street- and- eme- Seutk- a € -SAtk- Street:
(e) -- The - 50th -&- Fraaee- 6euereial- Area - shall- mean -the- area - within- the -city
ineluded- within -the- plan - prepared -by- the- H:R:A:- entitle& -'-' §8th -&- Fraaee- Eeemlereial
Area - Plan ' -'';- dated- Beeember -37-1974:
(d) Business hours shall be from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. of each day, except
Sunday, or such other hours during such days as may be set from time to time by
resolution of the City Council for any one or more of the municipal parking
facilities. Any business hours hereafter set by the City Council shall coincide,
as closely as possible, with those hours during which any substantial portion of
the businesses in the business area of the particular municipal parking facility
shall be open.
(e) Time limits shall be such as are specified by resolution of the City
Council from time to time for all or certain portions of any one or more of the
municipal parking facilities. In setting the time limit, the City Council shall
be guided by the purpose of allowing maximum use of the municipal parking
facilities by patrons of businesses located in the business area of each municipal
parking facility. Time limits shall be posted in a conspicuous manner, as
determined by the City Manager, on the municipal parking facilities.
Section 3. Exceptions, Permits.
Vehicles identified by a permit sticker issued by the City under this section may
be parked in- the -ramps in excess of the time limits, but only in such locations in
the - ramps municipal parking facilities as shall be designated from time to time by
the City Manager. Locations designated by the City Manager shall be those that
are least convenient for patrons of businesses located in the business area of the
ramps such designated municipal parking facilities, except that parking for
physically handicapped employees, as defined in Ordinance No. 1401, may be located
in other places in the -ramps such designated municipal parking facilities.
Locations so designated for employees and- for- physieally- kandieapped- empleyees
shall be posted in- a- eensgiexexs-manner; as -determined- by- tke-City-Manager at all
vehicular entrances to each designated municipal parking facility.
Ordinance No. 1232
Page 2
The Permit stickers shall be issued by such City department or City staff as the
City Manager from time to time shall designate, and shall be issued only to
Persons - to -be- designated eligible individuals as determined by the City Manager.
The- City - Manager -may- direet- the- issuanee- a €- xp -te- 600 -sueh- permits -te- persons -whe
are - employed -by- businesses -iR- the - 30th- &- FraAee- Commereial -Area: The maximum
number of.-Permit stickers issued in a calendar year for a particular municipal
parking facility r group of municipal parking facilities shall be set from time
to time by resolution of the City Council. Persons desiring a permit sticker
shall apply to the City Manager for-a- stieker on forms provided by the City
Manager. Upon Prior to issuance of each permit sticker, the recipient shall pay a
fee a €- $l2 - €er- the- ealendar- year- er -sxeh- Part- theree€ -then- remaining as set out in
Ordinance No. 171, and furnish a description of the make, year, body style, color
and license number of the vehicle to which it is to be fastened and the
recipient's place of employment. Permit stickers shall be numbered consecutively
and shall be valid only for the calendar year in which issued. The City shall
keep a record of the atm3ber -e €- the - stieker permit sticker number and the
description of the vehicle. The permit sticker'shall be fastened to the left rear
bumper of the vehicle and shall be visible at all times when the vehicle is parked
in the-ramp-such designated municipal parking facilities. When the vehicle is
sold or traded and another vehicle is acquired, the City, upon application for a
new permit sticker for the remainder of the calendar year, accompanied by a
description of the new vehicle and its license number, shall issue such new permit
sticker, without charge,-and show the old permit sticker as having been canceled.
Whenever a person to whom a permit sticker has been issued.shall cease to be
regularly employed upon the premises where he or she was employed at the time the
permit sticker was issued, the employer shall notify the City of such fact, and
the City shall cancel the old - stieker permit sticker of that person.
No person shall park a motor vehicle in parking spaces designated and reserved for
physically handicapped persons employees- xaless- the - permit- required -by -this
erdixaaee- be- €astexed -to- the - vehicle -as- herein - required -and unless that person is
physically handicapped or operating a vehicle under the direction and for the use
of a physically handicapped person employee and such vehicle also has displayed
prominently upon it.an identifying certificate or license plates issued to
physically handicapped.persons by the Minnesota Department of Public Safety
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 169.345 and 168.021.
- Section 4. Penalty. Violation.of this ordinance shall be a petty
misdemeanor which shall be punishable by a fine of not more than $200.
.Section 5. Repealer. Ordinance No. 1231, as amended, is hereby repealed in
its entirety.
ORDINANCE NO. 1232 -A1
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1232
TO INCLUDE REGULATION OF THE USE OF ALL
MUNICIPAL PARKING FACILITIES AND PROVIDING A PENALTY
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1.. Paragraphs (b) and (c) of Section 2 of Ordinance No. 1232 are
hereby deleted in their entirety.
Sec. 2. Section 3 of Ordinance No. 1232 is hereby amended to read as
follows:
"Section 3. Exceptions, Permits.
Vehicles identified by a permit sticker issued by the City under this
section may be parked in excess of the time limits, but only in such locations in
municipal parking facilities as shall be designated from time to time by the City
Manager. Locations designated by the City Manager shall be those that are least
convenient for patrons of businesses located in the business area of such
designated municipal parking facilities, except that parking for physically
handicapped employees, as defined in Ordinance No. 1401, may be located in other
places in such designated municipal parking facilities. Locations so designated
for employees shall be posted at all vehicular entrances to each designated
municipal parking facility.
Permit stickers shall be issued by such City department or City staff as the
City Manager from time to time shall designate, and shall be issued only to
eligible individuals as determined by the City Manager. The maximum number of
permit stickers issued in a calendar year for a particular municipal parking
facility or group of municipal parking facilities shall be set from time to time
by resolution of the City Council. Persons desiring a permit sticker shall apply
to the City Manager on forms provided by the City Manager. Prior.to issuance of
each permit sticker, the recipient shall pay a fee as set out in Ordinance No. 171
and furnish a description of the make, year, body style, color and license number
of the vehicle to which it is to be fastened and the recipient's place of
employment. Permit stickers shall be numbered consecutively and shall be valid
only for the calendar year in which issued. The City shall keep a record of the
permit sticker number and the description of the vehicle. The permit sticker
shall be fastened to the left rear bumper of the vehicle and shall be visible at
all times when the vehicle is parked.in such designated municipal parking
facilities. When the vehicle is sold or traded and another vehicle is acquired,
.the City, upon application for a new permit sticker for the remainder of the
calendar year, accompanied by a description of the new vehicle and its license
number, shall.issue such new permit sticker, without charge, and show the old
permit sticker as having been cancelled. Whenever a person to whom a permit
sticker has been issued shall cease to be regularly employed upon the premises
where he or she was employed at the time the permit sticker was issued, the
employer shall notify the City of such fact, and the City shall cancel the permit
sticker of that person.
No person shall park a motor vehicle in parking spaces designated and
reserved for physically handicapped persons unless that person is physically
handicapped or operating a vehicle under the direction and for the use of a
physically handicapped person and such vehicle has displayed prominently upon it
an identifying certificate or license plates issued to physically handicapped
persons by the Minnesota Department of Public Safety pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 169.345 and 168.021.
Ordinance No. 1232 -A1
Page 2
Sec. 3. Section 4 of Ordinance No. 1232 is hereby amended to read as
follows:
"Section 4. Penalty. Violation of this ordinance shall be a petty
misdemeanor which shall be punishable by a fine of not more than $200."
Sec. 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and,effect upon its passage
and publication.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
r
" REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Kenneth Rosland
FROM: David A. Velde
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: November 6, 1989 AGENDA ITEM vI.A
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Collection of Garbage /Refuse - City Properties
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Waste Management $5.75 - $6.61 /cu. yd.
2. Browning Ferris Industries 2.$5.68-$6.69/cu yd.
3. Buckingham-Disposal 3 $6.80 /cu. yd.
4. Quality Waste Control, Inc. 4.$6.88/cu. yd.
5. Metro Refuse, Inc. 5.$7.44/cu. yd.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Waste Management for two years at
$5.75 per cu. yd. for 1990 and $6.61 per cu. yd. for 1991.
GENERAL INFORMATION: Waste Management is a penny cheaper
per cubic yard over a two year contract. The anticipated cost for refuse
in 1990 and 1991 is $28,166.38 and $32,379.09 respectively. The total
cost for the two year contract as bid will be $60,545.77. The ney't
lowest bidder, Browning Ferris Industries, two year contract bid was
$60,588.26.
� 4, L� Health
Signature Department
The Recommended bid is
x
within budget not
Wallin, FinAnce Director
enneth Rosland, City Manager
° 0' REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
01 '^t1�nrnnw�•�
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Bob Kojetin
VIA: Kenneth Rosland; City Manager
SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000
DATE: November 21, 1989
AGENDA ITEM VI. B
ITEM DESCRIPTION: 3 scoreboards for Van Valkenburg Park
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1• AIM Electronics 1. $5,336.00
2. Adams Electronics 2. $5,796.00
3. Long Electric Co. 3. $5,916.00
4. 4.
5: 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
AIM Electronics $5,336.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
3 Daktronics scoreboards and consoles, and signal cable and freight,
for Van Valkenburg Park softball complex.
Total price to be reimbursed by Coca -Cola as per contractural
agreement.
• 1t �.
The Recommended bid is
within budget not
Department
c
Director
ty91��1 L;�
REQUEST FOR PURCH �+
o:; AS
TO: Mayor Fred Richards and Council Members
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director, Park and Recreation Department
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000
DATE: November 30, 1989
AGENDA ITEM VI . C
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Replacement furnace for Edina Golf Dome
Companv Amount of Quote or Bid
1- Flanagan Sales, Inc. 1. $45,610.00
2. 1460 West County Road C 2.
3.
Roseville, MN 55113
3
4. (only supplier)
4.
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Flanagan Sales, Inc.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Permanent furnace to replace temporary leased furnace at Golf Tome.
Specs were written for two differenct furnaces. This is specialized
equipment and only supplier that bids on dome furnaces. Also,
installation.is inclued, which is a specialty.
Price is within anticipated=Capital Improvement Budget.
i
Sign ture `-�
Department n
The Recommended bid is V_
within budget not within bu
Kenneth Rosland, City
W
Director
°� 0' REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: . Mayor & City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR 'PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: 4 December, 1989
AGENDA ITEM v I . D .
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Emergency Repair of Deep Well #2
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. E.H. Renner & Sons 1. $6,897.00
2. 2.
3. 3.
4. 4,
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
E.H. Renner & Sons $6,897.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Well #2 is one of our primary wells attached to an iron removal plant.
It suffered a failure in the column pipe discovered upon removal. The
work was performed on an emergency basis to be able to return the system
to an operating status as soon as possible. We rotate our emergency
repair work thru different well.contractors and emergency repair work
costs are usually very close to what a normal bid price would be. The
funds for the repair come from the Utility Fund.
r
Signature
The Recommended bid is
within budget not w
Public Works - Utility Dept.
Kenneth Rosland. City
Wallin, Fiance Director
e
En
Iry �g - �O
\fN�bHpOMt�v�
�aae
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Ken Rosland, Manager
From: John Wallin,
Finance Director
Date: December 4, 1989
Subject: Year End Council Meeting
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
VILA
Consent
M
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
To Council
Action
7
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
That Wednesday, December 27, 1989, at 4:30 p.m. be set as the Year -End
Council Meeting.
Info /Background:
The Year -End Council Meeting is primarily to approve payment of claims,
transfer of funds to be included in the current year, and, if necessary,
to Bold a truth in taxation public hearing if it is continued,[from the
December 18 Council Meeting.
Other business can be included on the agenda if action needs to be taken
before the first Regular Meeting in January. (01/02/90)
A.
o a Lo
O
It FUl"
,BOB
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis Hoffman
City Engineer
Date: 4 December, 19 &9
Subject: Street Lighting Hearings
for Delaney Boulevard
and Eden Prairie Road
Set Hearing Date
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # -V-U• B.
Consent 0
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
To Council
Action 0
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Set a hearing date of December 18, 1989 to conduct public hearing on two
street light petitions.
Info /Background:
The engineering staff has reviewed the petitions and developed a lighting
plan in cooperation with Northern States Power Company.
Project L -3�: Delaney Boulevard from Dewey Hill Road to West 78th Street is
estimated to cost $8,176.00.
Project.L- /: Eden Prairie Road from Kaymar Drive to Blake Road is
estimated to cost $4,907.84.
Both of these projects are judged to be feasible and staff would recommend a
public hearing on December 18, 1989.
A�
Vj
• �N�bRpoMt�O •
Jess
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Ken Rosland
From: Janet Chandler
Date: December 4, 1989
Subject: Recycl ing Contract
Amendment
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # -1/ 1 1 . c .
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
FLI
To Council
Action ❑
Motion
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Resolution to amend the contract with BFI Recycling to include recycling
service for the 323 townhomes which have individual attached garages.
Info /Background:
PROPOSAL
The proposal from BFI would provide weekly recycling collection for 323
townhomes at a monthly cost of $1.90 per unit (vs. $2.45 for single family
homes.) Since it takes less time per unit to service a group of townhomes
than a similar number of single family homes, the cost will be lower per
unit.
CONTAINERS
Containers will be delivered by BFI with no delivery charge. The supply of
containers on hand is sufficient to provide for the townhomes, and have a
remainder of 200 for future replacements.
PROMOTION
Two flyers will be distributed with each container: one from the City and
one from BFI. We will also try to gain the support of the owners
associations wherever possible.
-2-
SERVICE NOW PROVIDED FOR SOME TOWNHOMES
Recycling service has been provided to over 100 townhome units since early
in the program. This came about because the BFI drivers thought the
townhomes were duplexes (which were included in the contract.) The mixup
was discovered several weeks into the program, at which point it seemed
best to continue the service.
We were thus provided the opportunity to note any problems in townhome
service and compare costs with single family home service.
COSTS AND FUNDING
Assuming the current County Funding policy remains unchanged, the added
costs are anticipated to be:
Total Cost County Funding Edina Net
Monthly $ 613.70 $ 490.96 $ 122.74
Yearly $7,364.40 $5,891.52 $1,472.88
HENNEPIN COUNTY FUNDING POLICY
Present policy does not include funding for dwellings where garbage is
handled with dumpster service. Therefore, 154 townhomes with dumpster
service (Yorkdale and Oak Glen) have not been included for recycling
service at this time.
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
Kenneth Rosland
Agenda Item #
VIII.' A.
From:
David A. Velde
Consent
a
Information Only
❑
Date:
December 4, 1989
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
Designation of Agents
0
To Council
of the Community Health
Board
Action
❑
Motion
0
Resolution
-
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Adopt a Resolution designating Kenneth Rosland and David Velde as agents of the
Edina Community Health Board.
Info /Background:
The Edina Community Health. Services Plan update was submitted to the Minnesota
Department of Health in September 1989. The Minnesota Department of Health re-
quires that the Community Health Board designate an agent to act on behalf of
the Board between scheduled meetings. This resolution designates Kenneth Rosland
and David Velde as the agents of the Board.
RESOLUTION APPOINTING AGENTS OF THE
EDINA COMMUNITY HEALTH BOARD
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (Community Health Board) of the City of Edina,
Minnesota, pursuant to its authority under Minnesota Laws 1987, Chapter 309, that
it hereby appoints and authorized the following persons to act on the Board's
behalf and bind the Board for the following purposes:
To serve as the Board's agent according to Minnesota Laws 1987, Chapter 309,
Section 4, Subd. 2, in communicating with the Commissioner of Health,between
Board meetings, including receiving information from the Commissioner and
disseminating that information to the Board, as well as providing information
to the Commissioner on the Board's behalf.
Name: David A. Velde
Address: 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424
Phone: (B) (612) 927 -8861
(H) (612) 561 -4009
To sign and submit to the Commissioner the prepared Community Health Plan and
revisions to the plan submitted according to Minnesota Laws 1987, Chapter 309,
Subd. 5 and 6.
Name: Kenneth Rosland
Address: 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424
Phone: (B) (612) 927 -8861
(H) (612) 831 -5910
To sign and submit to the Commissioner the Board's annual budgets, revisions
to the budget, expenditure reports and activity reports submitted according
to Minnesota Laws 1987, Chapter 309, Section 10, Subd. 6 and 8.
Name: David A. Velde
Address: 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424
Phone: (B) (612) 917 -8861
(H) (612) 561 -4009
To sign and execute on behalf of the Board, delegation agreements with the
Commissioner of Health in accordance with Minnesota Laws 1987, Chapter 309,
Section 7. -
Name: Kenneth Rosland
Address: 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424
Phone: (B) (612) 917 -8861
(H) (612) 831 -5910
ADOPTED this 4th day of December, 1989.
•
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
12 -04 -89 PAGE 1
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
GLASS INTED
10 4248 560 . -56
+ 475c--4_109
+-z-
99.97
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
0-5 60 56 57 03 i 2 -41-99-
224.60
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
338703
11/21/89
22.50
AMERICAN LEGION
ADVERTISING
50- 4214 - 820 -82
338703
11/21/89
22.50
AMERICAN LEGION
ADVERTISING
50- 4214 - 840 -84
338703
11/21/89
22.50
AMERICAN LEGION
ADVERTISING
50- 4214 - 860 -86
67.50
338704
11/21/89
1,636.32
A DICKEY ARCHITECTS
AC REMODEL
23- 1300 - 001 -00
88728
1,636.32
338705
11/21/89
45.00
JOEL RADJENOVICH
REFUND
10- 4202 - 440 -44
45.00
338706
11/21/89
950.00
MILLS ADVERTISING
MAGAZINE PROTOTYPE
12- 4215 - 434 -43
950.00
338707
11/21/89
159.41
MPLS ZIP SORT CORP
PRO SERVICES
23-4201- 611 -61
7201
159.41
338708
11/21/89
12,800.00
LUIS HERNANDEZ
REFEREE
27- 4201 - 667 -66
338708
11/21/89
1,280.00
LUIS HERNANDEZ
REFEREE
27- 4201 - 667 -66
338708
11/21/89
12,800.00-
LUIS HERNANDEZ
REFEREE
27- 4201 - 667 -66
1,280.00 *
338709
11/21/89
75.00
MERLE ANDERSON
SERVICES /DOME
27- 4201 - 667 -66
75.00 *
338710
11/21/89
1,650.00
WITZEL TREE MOVING
TREE MOVING
10- 4248 - 644 -64
1521 4368
1,650.00 *
338711
11/21/89
5,600.00
STANDARD & POORS
BOND REFUNDING
10- 1145- 000 -00
172149
5,600.00 *
338712
11/21/89
35.00
NATIONAL CENTER FOR
MEMBERSHIP
10- 4204 - 120 -12
35.00 *
338713
11/21/89
55.00
SHIGO & TREES ASSO
FORESTY BOOK
10- 4202 - 640 -64
55.00 *
338714
11/21/89
239.91
ROGER OLWIN
REIMBURSEMENT
10- 4266 - 420 -42
338714
11/21/89
17.50
ROGER OLWIN
REIMBURSEMENT
10- 4508 - 420 -42
338714
11/21/89
2.80
ROGER OLWIN
REIMBURSEMENT
10- 4572 - 420 -42
260.21 *
338715
11/21/89
90.00
LIFE LINK III
CONT ED
10- 4202 - 420 -42
EMR024
90.00 *
338716
11/21/89
20.00
CSC CREDIT SERV INC
PRO SERV
10- 4201 - 420 -42
L'
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
VENDOR
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
338716
11/21/89
120.00
DUES /SUBSCRIPTION
ASSO OF TRAINING
140.00 *
338717
11/21/89
44.97
PAGER
AUDIO INTELLIGENCE
44.97 *
338718
11/21/89
15.00
338718
11/21/89
15.00
338718
11/21/89
15.00
EQUIP MAINT
BLEVINS CONCESSIONS
45.00 *
338719
11/21/89
15,500.00-
338719
11/21/89
3,579.60
338719
11/21/89
1,556.16 !,559.99
338719
11/21/89
15,500.00
EDINA HISTORICAL
ADVERTISING
5,135.76'- 5, 129 .69
338720
11/21/89
48.00
TIPS
MANAGEMENT STUDY
48.00
338721
11/21/89
45.00
45.00
338722
11/21/89
275.15 ' =88.26-
275.15* 444
338723
11/21/89
478.59
478.59
338724
11/21/89
325.00
325.00
338725
11/21/89
204.00
204.00
338726
11/21/89
156.00
156.00
338727
11/21/89
2,994.53
2,994.53
338728
11/21/89
35.00
338728
11/21/89
34.00
338728
11/21/89
33.00
338728
11/21/89
33.00
135.00 *
338729
11/21/89
275.00
275.00 *
338730
11/21/89
55.00
55.00 *
338731
11/21/89
50.00
50.00 *
w
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
CSC CREDIT SERV INC
MEMBERSHIP FEES
SEARCH & SEIZURE
DUES
ASSO OF TRAINING
DUES /SUBSCRIPTION
ASSO OF TRAINING
DUES /SUBSCRIPTION
ASSO OF TRAINING
DUES /SUBSCRIPTION
AUDIO INTELLIGENCE
PAGER
AUDIO INTELLIGENCE
EQUIPMENT
AUDIO INTELLIGENCE
PAGER
AUDIO INTELLIGENCE
PAGER
LEFEVERE LEFLER
DUES /SUBSCRIPTION
AFFILIATED EM VET
PRO SERVICES
MEMOREX TELEX
EQUIP MAINT
BLEVINS CONCESSIONS
CONCESSIONS
THE CAULKERS CO
CONSTRUCTION
PAUL GANRUD
REPAIRS /DOME
CORY SMITH
REPAIRS /DOME
FILM TECH CORP
REFUND
EDINA HISTORICAL
ADVERTISING
EDINA HISTORICAL
ADVERTISING
EDINA HISTORICAL
ADVERTISING
EDINA HISTORICAL
ADVERTISING
GREAT WORKS
PARK CLEANUP
TIPS
MANAGEMENT STUDY
DAVE MEACHAM
SERVICES
v
12 -04 -89 PAGE
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4204 - 420 -42
10- 4204 - 420 -42
10- 4204 - 420 -42 1180
10- 4204 - 420 -42 1046
10- 4204 - 420 -42 1098
10 -1139- 000 -00 044557 3165
10- 1139 - 000 -00 3214
10- 1139 - 000 -00 044557 3165
10- 1139 - 000 -00 044557 3165
10- 4204 - 420 -42
10- 4201 - 470 -47 53262B
10- 4274 - 420 -42 989065
28- 4624 - 703 -70 330364 4336
60 -1300- 005 -20 2554 4568
27- 4248 - 669 -66
27- 4248 - 669 -66
40- 3357 - 000 -00
10- 4504 - 627 -62
50- 4214 - 820 -82
50- 4214 - 840 -84
50- 4214 - 860 -86
10- 4201 - 643 -64 4552
10- 4201 - 662 -66 4553
40- 4248 - 902 -90
� s
2
a
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
338732
11/21/89
338733
11/21/89
338734
11/21/89
338735
11/21/89
* * * * **
PRO SERV
338737
11/21/89
338737
11/21/89
338738
11/21/89
338739
11/21/89
338740
11/21/89
338741
11/21/89
338742
11/21/89
338743
11/21/89
338744
11/21/89
338745
11/21/89
338746
11/21/89
338747
11/27/89
338748
11/27/89
338749
11/27/89
338750
11/27/89
L�
AMOUNT
83.97
83.97 *
472.92
472.92 *
3,583.00
3,583.00 *
400.00
400.00 *
1.63
95.39
97.02 *
106.95
106.95 *
283.62
283.62 *
60.00
60.00 *
1,840.00
1,840.00 *
952.00
952.00 *
25.00
25.00 *
143.81
143.81 *
17.50
17.50 *
324.58
324.58 *
85.17
85.17 *
80.00
80.00 *
75.00
75.00 *
60.00
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
NATIONAL MOWER CO PARTS
CONVEYORS TRANS BELT
FINLEY BROS ENR HOCKEY RINK FENCE
SAY IT ONCE SYSTEMS, INC.
DTP TRAINING
12 -04 -89 PAGE 3
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
27- 4504- 664 -66 032726 4203
10- 4620 - 560 -56 C79677 4091
10- 4201 - 647 -64 3790 4285
10- 4201 - 500 -50 637
DIANE SANKEY PW
KERR LIDS
10- 4504 - 482 -48
DIANE SANKEY PW
TOOLS
10- 4580- 301 -30
AUERBACH PUBLISHING
NEW EQUIPMENT
10- 4902 - 510 -51
4284
MONA MEYER & MCGRAW
PRO SERV
10- 4201 - 500 -50
36210
US POSTAL SERVICE
PERMIT /BULK MAILING
10- 4290 - 510 -51
00303
POUCHER PRINTING
BOND REFUNDING
10- 1145 - 000 -00
3385B
AM FINANCIAL
BOND REFUNDING
10- 1145- 000 -00
LAUKKA DEVELOPMENT
REFUND
40- 3800 - 000 -00
TASCO INDUSTRIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30-4504- 781 -78
92857 4109
TODD CORP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
388928 4638
ROBELAN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
90164 4637
CINDY WAKNITZ
REIMBURSEMENT
30- 4262 - 782 -78
JAMES TOENSING
PERFORMANCE
30- 4224 - 781 -78
JOAN MICKSON
PERFORMANCE
30- 4224 - 781 -78
BECKY BROM
PERFORMANCE
30- 4224 - 781 -78
* * * -CKS
1989 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
338751
338752
338753
338754
338755
338756
338757
338758
338759
338760
338761
338761
338761
338762
338763
338764
338765
338766
338766
338766
338767
11/27/89
11/27/89
11/27/89
11/27/89
11/27/89
11/27/89
11/27/89
11/27/89
11/27/89
11/27/89
11/27/89
11/27/89
11/27/89
11/27/89
11/27/89
11/27/89
11/27/89
11/27/89
11/27/89
11/27/89
11/27/89
AMOUNT
60.00 *
75.00
75.00 *
100.00
100.00 *
50.00
50.00 *
109.80
109.80 *
88.52 44. .-
88.52* 26-9
22.50
22.50
2,500.00
2,500.00
60.00
60.00
269.00
269.00
70.00
70.00
2,292.00
250.00
500.00
3,042.00 *
806.63
806.63 *
650.00
650.00 *
122.75
122.75 *
47.52
47.52 *
20.00
20.00
20.00
60.00 *
875.00
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
NANCY ROZYCKI
MIKAEL RUDOLPH
VIRGININA BURTON
BOB BRAMWELL
DANIEL SMITH
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSN
GRANT THORNTON
US WEST COMM
MINN COMM PAGING
QUALITY WOOD PROD
HALLA NURSERY INC
HALLA NURSERY INC
HALLA NURSERY INC
SLOPE INDICATOR CO
MN SAFETY COUNCIL
VINCENT COCKRIEL
ART GOKEY
COMPUTER CHEQUE /MN
COMPUTER CHEQUE /MN
COMPUTER CHEQUE /MN
LINDA KOZAK
r �
PERFORMANCE
PERFORMANCE
PERFORMANCE
MILEAGE
COST /GOODS SOLD
BOOKS
BOND REFUNDING
CABLE REPAIR
PAGER
LUMBER
TREES PLANTED
TREES PLANTED
TREES PLANTED
REPAIR PARTS
SAFETY TRAINING
REFUND
MILEAGE
COLLECTION CHARGES
COLLECTION CHARGES
COLLECTION CHARGES
11/22/89- 12/05/89
b
12 -04 -89 PAGE 4
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4208 - 781 -78
23- 4624 - 613 -61 341103 4427
10- 4204 - 600 -60
10- 1145 - 000 -00 06655
40- 4248 - 801 -80 A86826 4605
12- 4802 - 434 -43
10- 4604 - 260 -26
10- 4504 - 318 -30 3822
10- 4504 - 365 -30 3822
10- 4504 - 370 -30 3822
40- 4540 - 801 -80 32593 4388
10- 4202 - 281 -28 27271 4529
10- 4202 - 640 -64
40- 4208 - 806 -80
50- 4201 - 820 -82 10833
50- 4201 - 840 -84 10834
50- 4201 - 860 -86 10835
30- 4201 - 781 -78
1989 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
338768
11/27/89
338769
11/27/89
338770
11/27/89
338771
11/27/89
338772
11/27/89
338773
11/27/89
338774
11/27/89
338775
11/27/89
338776
11/27/89
338777
11/28/89
338778
11/28/89
338779
11/28/89
338780
11/28/89
338781
11/28/89
338782
11/28/89
338783
11/28/89
338784
11/28/89
338785
11/28/89
998 -8-7-
11/28/89
338786
AMOUNT
875.00
875.00
875.00 *
100.00
100.00 *
50.00
50.00 *
50.00
50.00 *
56.25
56.25 *
2,679.00
2,679.00 *
26.21
26.21 *
245.00
245.00 *
75.00
75.00 *
28.00
28.00 *
11.04
11.04 *
20.00
20.00 *
292.50
292.50 *
125.00
125.00 *
228.00
228.00 *
162.00
162.00 *
75.00
75.00 *
10.00*
so. -9-
45.00*
1
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
LINDA KOZAK
KEITH JOHNSON
JOANN SCHWMACHER
MARILYN BOE
JOHN HARELAND
MIDWEST LANDSCAPING
ELSA M FOLLETT
LILLIAN MUELLER
DEVERNS INC
JANET M CANTON
SOLVEI SWENSON
MN RECREATION & PARK
NW TENNIS ASSOC
ROXANNE SEIDEL
CAROLA VIERA
OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC
1990 MIDWESTERN SECT
EM GO
JAY SJOSTROM
f
12/6/89- 12/19/89
PERFORMANCE 2/15/89
PERFORMANCE 3/1/90
PERFORMANCE 2/27/90
POSTS
PURCHASE TREES
AMBULANCE REFUND
AMBULANCE REFUND
PRO SERVICES
MILEAGE /LOGIS
MILEAE
REGISTRATION
PAYMENT
SERVICES
REFUND
COST /GOODS SOLD
ADVERTISING
REFUND
SKATING REFUND
0
12 -04 -89 PAGE 5
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
30- 4201 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
27- 1300 - 001 -00
3634
10- 4560 - 644 -64 1601
4343
10- 3180 - 000 -00
10- 3180 - 000 -00
30- 4201 - 782 -78 4655
10- 4208 - 160 -16
10- 4208 - 600 -60
10- 4202 - 600 -60
30- 3505- 000 -00
30- 4201 - 781 -78
10- 4248 - 644 -64
28- 4624 - 703 -70 4HO130
4551
28- 4600 - 701 -70
4423
40..3800- 000 -00
28- 3500 - 000 -00
* * * -CKS
:✓
12 -04 -89 PAGE 6
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
28- 3500 - 000 -00
28- 4224 - 701 -70
28- 4202 - 701 -70
28- 3500 - 000 -00
28- 3500 - 000 -00
28- 3500- 000 -00
28- 3500 - 000 -00
28- 4504 - 702 -70 94043 4664
27- 4288 - 663 -66 35153 4629
50- 1300 - 003 -00 4660
* ** -CKS
10- 4542 - 325 -30 3679
* ** -CKS
28- 4248 - 702 -70 68108 4663
* ** -CKS
10- 4310 - 560 -56
* ** -CKS
50- 4214 - 822 -82 EDA017
50- 4214 - 842 -84 EDA017
50- 4214 - 862 -86 EDA017
* ** -CKS
30- 4304 - 782 -78 809163 4639
I
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
90.00*
338787
11/28/89
--46.9
SHARON HERMAN
SKATING REFUND
338788
11/28/89
9,941.80
DEDE HENSEL
PRO SERV
9,941.80
338789
11/28/89
138.00
NANCY KNUDSON
SCHOOL CONFERENCE
138.00
338790
11/28/89
45.00
MARGO HOPPMANN
SKATING REFUND
45.00
*
338791
11/28/89
45.00
PAM CHRISTIANSON
SKATING REFUND
45.00
*
338792
11/28/89
90.00
DONNA ALT
SKATING REFUND
90.00
*
338793
11/28/89
45.00
NYDIA CARVER
SKATING REFUND
45.00
*
338794
11/28/89
50.00
ALCO CAPITAL RES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
50.00
*
338795
11/28/89
225.00
ENVIROMATIC CORP
MAINT
225.00
*
338796
11/28/89
1,965.00
PHIL DUFFNEY & SONS
CUSTOM FIXTURES
1,965.00
*
* * * * **
338AO1
11/21/89
200.85
3M CO
LETTERS
200.85
*
* * * * **
338AO6
11/28/89
97.00
A -1 ROOTMASTER
REPAIR DRAIN
97.00
*
* * * * **
338A09
11/27/89
4,721.04
AAA
TITLE /FILING /LIC
4,721.04
*
* * * * **
338A17
11/21/89
1,213.57
ADS TO GO
ADVERTISING
338A17
11/21/89
1,213.56
ADS TO GO
ADVERTISING
338A17
11/21/89
1,213.56
ADS TO GO
ADVERTISING
3,640:69
* * * * **
338A21
11/21/89
185.50
ADT SECURITY SYS.
ALARM SERV
:✓
12 -04 -89 PAGE 6
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
28- 3500 - 000 -00
28- 4224 - 701 -70
28- 4202 - 701 -70
28- 3500 - 000 -00
28- 3500 - 000 -00
28- 3500- 000 -00
28- 3500 - 000 -00
28- 4504 - 702 -70 94043 4664
27- 4288 - 663 -66 35153 4629
50- 1300 - 003 -00 4660
* ** -CKS
10- 4542 - 325 -30 3679
* ** -CKS
28- 4248 - 702 -70 68108 4663
* ** -CKS
10- 4310 - 560 -56
* ** -CKS
50- 4214 - 822 -82 EDA017
50- 4214 - 842 -84 EDA017
50- 4214 - 862 -86 EDA017
* ** -CKS
30- 4304 - 782 -78 809163 4639
I
v 0 40
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
12 -04 -89
PAGE 7
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. #
MESSAGE
185.50
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
338A29
11/27/89
107.43
ALBINSON
MEASURING TAPES
10- 4604 - 260 -26
603145
8742
338A29
11/21/89
40.85
ALBINSON
PRINT FOR GC
27- 1300 - 003 -00
601361
8742
148.28
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
338A39
11/21/89
68.16
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
BATTERY
10- 4504- 343 -30
1718
4123
338A39
11/21/89
98.12
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
BATTERY
10- 4504 - 440 -44
1719
4176
166.28
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
338A41
11/28/89
34.00
AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE
MEAT
27- 4624 - 663 -66
8919
34.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
338A53
11/21/89
208.49
AMERICAN SHARECOM
TELEPHONE
10- 4256 - 510 -51
338A53
11/21/89
208.49-
AMERICAN SHARECOM
TELEPHONE
10- 4262 - 510 -51
338A53
11/21/89
208.49
AMERICAN SHARECOM
TELEPHONE
10- 4262 - 510 -51
208.49
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
338A60
11/21/89
76.46
ANCHOR PAPER
TOWEL DISPENSER
10- 4514 - 520 -52
4173
76.46
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
338A72
11/21/89
351.00
ASHLAND CHEMICAL
WINSHIELD WASH
10- 4620 - 560 -56
3971
351.00
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
338A76
11/28/89
125.00
ASPLUND COFFEE
COST OF GOODS
28- 4624 - 703 -70
42251
4335
338A76
11/21/89
351.00
ASPLUND COFFEE
CONCESSIONS
28- 4624 - 703 -70
41289
4335
476.00
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
338A80
11/27/89
77,984.00
ASTLEFORD INTL
DUMP TRUCKS
10- 4901 - 305 -30
59033
9886
77,984.00
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
338A82
11/28/89
24.61
AT & T
TELEPHONE
30- 4256 - 782 -78
24.61
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
338A85
11/21/89
95.00
AUDIO VISUAL WHSE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504- 782 -78
29864
4577
v 0 40
1989 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
338BO5
338605
338605
338B05
338805
338605
338605
338605
338805
* * * * **
338B18
338618
338618
338818
338B18
338B18
* * * * **
338B30
338B30
338B30
338B30
338B30
338630
338B30
338B30
* * * * **
338B42
338842
* * * * **
338860
338B72
338672
* * * * **
338678
11/27/89
11/27/89
11/27/89
11/27/89
11/27/89
11/27/89
11/27/89
11/27/89
11/27/89
AMOUNT
95.00
166.77
30.00
25.00
13.24
24.00
15.00
23.78
23.78
23.78-
297.79* =°1-92
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
BACH -BI.LL
BACH -BILL
BACH -BILL
BACH -BILL
BACH -BILL
BACH -BILL
BACH -BILL
BACH -BILL
BACH -BILL
RF?MbRSEMENT ES
POSTAGE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PRINTING
SIOL SAMPLES
SOIL SAMPLES
SIOL SAMPLES
12 -04 -89 PAGE 8
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
30 -4516- 781 -78
30- 4201 - 783 -78
30- 4290 - 781 -78
30- 4504- 781 -78
30- 4504 - 782 -78
30- 4600 - 781 -78
30- 4660 - 782 -78
30- 4660 - 782 -78
30- 4660 - 782 -78
* ** -CKS
11/21/89
80.28
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
70598
4101
11/21/89
226.24
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
BATTERY
10- 4540 - 560 -56
70476
4259
11/21/89
343.56
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
BATTERIES
10- 4540 - 560 -56
68364
4266
11/21/89
160.59
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
BATTERY
10- 4540 - 560 -56
66138
3797
11/21/89
85.35
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
BRAKE SHOE
10- 4540 - 560 -56
68367
3915
11/21/89
253.90
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
BLADES
10- 4620 - 560 -56
70477
4087
1,149.92
* ** -CKS
11/21/89
5.70
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 120 -12
513297
11/21/89
20.19
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
BINDERS
10- 4504- 160 -16
517404
11/21/89
39.60
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
BINDERS
10- 4504 - 301 -30
517404
11/21/89
38.20
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
517404
11/21/89
113.10
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
COPIER LABELS
10- 4504 - 510 -51
513297
11/21/89
5.27-
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
CREDIT
10- 4504- 510 -51
513297
11/27/89
63.98
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
30- 4516- 781 -78
161900
4569
11/27/89
33.52
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE MATERIAL
40- 4504 - 801 -80
517708
4520
309.02 *
* ** -CKS
11/21/89
275.40
BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY
OFFICE SUPPLIES
30- 4516 - 781 -78
870965
4544
11/27/89
48.94
BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY
OFFICE SUPPLIES
30- 4516 - 782 -78
128206
4647
324.34 *
* ** -CKS
11/21/89
295.33
BORCHERT - INGERSOL
PULLEY
10- 4540 - 560 -56
146621
3997
295.33 *
11/21/89
55.00
BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE
EVENT FEE
10- 4280 - 504 -50
(2checks)
* ** -CKS
11/21/89
656.20
656.29
BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE
INSPECTION TOUR
10- 4206 - 100 -10
* ** -CKS
11/21/89
303.69
BRISSMAN - KENNEDY INC
CLEANING SUPPLIES
10- 4512 - 520 -52
140513
4421
10
12 -04 -89 PAGE 9
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10 -4504- 301 -30 293638 4178
10- 4504 - 343 -30 S07104 4116
41- 4504 - 900 -90 S07079 4265
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 510 -51 46360
* ** -CKS
10- 4540- 560 -56 55249 4122
27- 4516 - 661 -66 6574
* ** -CKS
10- 4210 - 140 -14 106587
30- 4214 - 781 -78 106627 4634
* ** -CKS
30- 4288 - 782 -78 179351 1400
* ** -CKS
10- 4258- 446 -44
10- 4258 - 646 -64
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 482 -48 4486
* ** -CKS
40- 4540 - 803 -80 15503 4191
* ** -CKS
10- 4218 - 220 -22 367672
10- 4218- 220 -22 367673
10- 4218 - 220 -22 367674
.40
* ** -CKS
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
303.69
*
338679
11/21/89
435.00
BROCK WHITE
MATERIAL
338679
11/21/89
92.75
BROCK WHITE
EPDXY PATCHER
338B79
11/21/89
64.68
BROCK WHITE
FORMS
592.43
*
* * * * **
338C0S
11/21/89
201.30
CARLSON PRINTING
BUSINESS CARDS
201.30
*
* * * * **
338C22
11/21/89
220.00
CERT POWER TRAIN
PARTS
220.00
*
338C23
11/21/89
49.00
CORE RESTORE
CARTRIDGE REPLACE
49.00
*
* * * * **
338C25
11/27/89
55.80
CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO
ADS FOR BIDS
338C25
11/21/89
45.25
CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO
ADVERTISING
101.05
*
* * * * **
338C27
11/27/89
296.00
CHEMLAWN
CHEMICALS
296.00
*
* * * * **
338C33
11/27/89
142.60
CITY OF EDINA
WATER
338C33
11/27/89
27.10
CITY OF EDINA
WATER
169.70
*
;;*8c*:;
11/21/89
486.85
CURTIN MATHESON SCI
LAB SUPPLIES
486.85
*
* * * * **
338D31
11/21/89
37.52
DAVIES WATER EQUIP
PAINT
37.52
*
* * * * **
338D79
11/28/89
17,959.47
DORSEY & WHITNEY
LEGAL
338D79
11/28/89
18,576.63
DORSEY & WHITNEY
LEGAL
338D79
11/28/89
7,992.22
DORSEY & WHITNEY
LEGAL
44,528.32
* * * * **
10
12 -04 -89 PAGE 9
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10 -4504- 301 -30 293638 4178
10- 4504 - 343 -30 S07104 4116
41- 4504 - 900 -90 S07079 4265
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 510 -51 46360
* ** -CKS
10- 4540- 560 -56 55249 4122
27- 4516 - 661 -66 6574
* ** -CKS
10- 4210 - 140 -14 106587
30- 4214 - 781 -78 106627 4634
* ** -CKS
30- 4288 - 782 -78 179351 1400
* ** -CKS
10- 4258- 446 -44
10- 4258 - 646 -64
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 482 -48 4486
* ** -CKS
40- 4540 - 803 -80 15503 4191
* ** -CKS
10- 4218 - 220 -22 367672
10- 4218- 220 -22 367673
10- 4218 - 220 -22 367674
.40
* ** -CKS
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
12 -04 -89
PAGE 10
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
338D81
11/28/89
415.00
DOWNEY WATER COND.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
28- 4504 - 702 -70
2781
4490
415.00 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
338D85
11/27/89
218.00
DUFFEY PAPER CO.
PAPER
10- 4504 - 510 -51
923494
4498
218.00 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
338D88
11/22/89
54.50-
DUO CHEM
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
4636
338D88
11/21/89
54.50
DUO CHEM
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
4636
338D88
11/27/89
485.73
DUO CHEM
CHEMICALS
30- 4540 - 782 -78
MN4825
4652
485.73 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
338E14
11/21/89
141.72
EARL F. ANDERSON
ALUM BLANKS /SIGNS
10- 4542 - 325 -30
92169
4267
141.72 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
338E20
11/27/89
85.00
ECOLAB PEST ELIM.
SERVICE CONTRACT
30- 4288 - 782 -78
P18332
4648
85.00 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
338E71
11/27/89
23.42
ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 520 -52
23.42 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
338E75
11/27/89
300.00
EMPLOYEES CLUB
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 500 -50
300.00 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
338E94
11/21/89
496.00
ESS BROS & SONS
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 900 -90
1581
4454
496.00 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
338F02
11/28/89
187.50
FACILITY SYSTEMS
REMODELING
10- 4901 - 420 -42
42545
4669
338F02
11/28/89
115.78
FACILITY SYSTEMS
REMODELING
10- 4901 - 420 -42
42598
4668
303.28 *
* ** -CKS
338F11
11/27/89
809.06
FEED RITE CONTROL
WATER.CHEMICALS
40- 4622 - 805 -80
132000
1670
809.06 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
338F26
11/21/89
283.97
FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL
HOSE ASSEM
10- 4540 - 560 -56
3224
3745
w
s
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
12 -04 -89
PAGE 11
283.97 *
kRkRk*
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
338F47
11/27/89
102.00
102.00 *
kkkkkk
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
338F64
11/21/89
13.00
13.00 *
kkkkkk
* ** -CKS
338G15
11/27/89
54.00
54.00 *
k k k k k k
338G24
11/21/89
84.74
338G24
11/21/89
954.00
8923
1,038.74 *
kkkkkk
338G44
11/21/89
100.00
GEN. COMMUNICATIONS
RADIO SERVICE
100.00 *
kR *RRk
1325
338H03
11/28/89
36.00
57493
3690
36.00 *
kkkkkk
338H09
11/27/89
1,249.75
GLEN SIPE PIANO SERV
SERVICE CONTRACT
1,249.75 *
kkkkkk
4635
338H21
11/21/89
202.14
338H21
11/21/89
93.97 2ff.i4 -*
338H28
11/27/89
12,950.00
1642
4624\
12,950.00 *
:::H5 6
11/27/89
4.46
338H56
11/27/89
21.75
48201
4366
26.21 *
kRk *kk
w
40
* ** -CKS
CHECK REGISTER
12 -04 -89
PAGE 11
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
FOWLER ELECTRIC
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
97975
4567
* ** -CKS
FRED VOGT & CO.
REFUND
10- 3130 - 000 -00
* ** -CKS
GEM TAP SERV
CLEANING
27- 4630 - 663 -66
8923
* ** -CKS
GEN. COMMUNICATIONS
RADIO SERVICE
10- 4248 - 440 -44
57114
1325
GEN. COMMUNICATIONS
REPLACE RADIO
27- 4504- 664 -66
57493
3690
* ** -CKS
GLEN SIPE PIANO SERV
SERVICE CONTRACT
30- 4288 - 782 -78
89117
4635
* ** -CKS
HOLMSTEN ICE RINKS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
28- 4504 - 704 -70
1642
4624\
* ** -CKS
HALLMAN
ENGINE OIL
10- 4618 - 560 -56
48201
4366
* ** -CKS
HARMON GLASS
WINDSHIELD
10- 4248 - 560 -56
197410
4119
(2 checks)
HARMON GLASS
GLASS TINTED
10- 4248 - 560 -56
110750 4109
* ** -CKS
HAYDEN- MURPHY EQUIP
ALLIED HYDRA HAMMER
40- 1340 - 000 -00
3604
3919
* ** -CKS
HIRSHFIELDS
PAINT
10- 4544 - 646 -64
111588
4657
HIRSHFIELDS
WOOD
10- 4604 - 646 -64
111657
4477
40
* ** -CKS
I
1989 CITY-OF
EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
338H63
11/27/89
* * * * **
WOOD
338H74
11/21/89
* * * * **
LUMBER
338I78
11/21/89
* * * * **
4365
338J27
11/21/89
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
338J35
11/21/89
* * * * **
10- 4540- 520 -52
338J74
11/21/89
338J74
11/21/89
338J74
11/21/89
* * * * **
4243
338K09
11/21/89
338K09
11/21/89
* * * * **
519111
338K35
11/27/89
338K35
11/27/89
338K35
11/27/89
338K35
11/27/89
338K35
11/28/89
338K35
11/21/89
338K35
11/21/89
338K35
11/21/89
338K35
11/27/89
338K35
11/27/89
338K35
11/21/89
* * * * **
527492
338K57
11/21/89
AMOUNT
214.20
214.20 *
4.24
4.24 *
298.13
298.13 *
3.99
3.99 *
17.22
17.22 *
8.50
16.20
88.76
113.46 *
39.92
121.37
161.29 *
56.02
10.99
55.99
97.28
87.51
89.82
197.29
95.68
4.70-
83.02
69.80
838.70
2,189.85
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
HOFFERS INC LINE PAINT
HOOTEN CLEANERS
ISIA
JERRYS FOODS
JERRYS PRINTING
LAUNDRY
PRINTING
BATTERY
PRINTING
•'1
IWO
12 -04 -89 PAGE 12
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4563 - 642 -64 69067 3806
10- 4262 - 420 -42
28- 4600 - 701 -70 4319
10- 4504 - 440 -44
10- 4600 - 480 -48 8096
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
JUSTUS
LUMBER
NAILS
27- 4540 - 667 -66 12319
4021
JUSTUS
LUMBER
WOOD
27- 4540 - 667 -66 23862
4281
JUSTUS
LUMBER
WOOD
27- 4540- 667 -66 14243
4223
4365
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
* ** -CKS
KAMAN
BEARING & SPLY
BEARING REPLACEMENT
10- 4540- 520 -52
3969
KAMAN
BEARING & SPLY
ROLLER CHAIN
10- 4540 - 560 -56
3912
* ** -CKS
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
BLDG
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 343 -30
527538
4361
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
BLDG
SUPPLIES
10- 4540 - 390 -30
496170
4365
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
BLDG
SUPPLIES
10- 4540 - 520 -52
495445
4371
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
BLDG
MATERIAL
10- 4540 - 520 -52
527775
4243
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
28- 4540-704 -70
519111
4491
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
SHOP
MATERIAL
40- 4504 - 802 -80
496313
4382
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
SHOP
MATERIAL
40- 4504 - 802 -80
527750
4269
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
SHOP
MATERIAL
40- 4504 - 802 -80
527492
4370
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
CREDIT
41- 4504 - 900 -90
527842
4262
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
BLDG
SUPPLIES
41- 4504 - 900 -90
527834
4262
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
REMODELING
50- 1300 - 003 -00
527751
4579
* ** -CKS
KUETHER DIST. CO. BEER 50- 4630 - 822 -82
1989 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
kkkkkk
PRODUCTS
338L04
11/27/89
kkkkkk
PARTS
338L28
11/21/89
338L28
11/21/89
338L28
11/21/89
338L28
11/21/89
338L28
11/21/89
338L28
11/21/89
kkkkkk
50- 4233 - 820 -82
33802
11/27/89
kkkkkk
50- 4233 - 840 -84
338L48
11/27/89
k k k k k k
50- 4233 - 860 -86
338L60
11/21/89
338L60
11/21/89
338L60
11/21/89
338L60
11/21/89
338L60
11/21/89
338L60
11/21/89
338L60
11/21/89
kkkkkk
338L66
11/21/89
kkkkkk
338M16
11/27/89
kkkkkk
338M23
11/21/89
338M23
11/21/89
338M23
11/21/89
kkkkkk
V
AMOUNT
2,189.85 *
7,177.00
7,177.00 *
170.15
343.15
360.99
191.99
362.41
487.06
1,915.75 *
4,196.00
4,196.00 *
4,194.00
4,194.00 *
2,617.66
821.09
3,777.67
1,418.76
301.66
301.66
301.66
9,540.16 *
50.84
50.84 *
491.64
491.64 *
75.00
75.00
75.00
225.00 *
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
LAHASS SERVICE BODY
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
PARTS
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
PARTS
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
PARTS
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
PARTS
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
PARTS
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
PARTS
Is
12 -04 -89 PAGE 13
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
10- 4901 - 305 -30 7066 3591
10- 4504 - 301 -30
10- 4504 - 322 -30
10- 4620 - 560 -56
10- 4620 - 560 -56
40- 4504 - 803 -80
40- 4540 - 803 -80
10- 4204 - 140 -14
* ** -CKS
3940
3927
3978
3928
3926
3979
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
LIGHTING RESOURCES LIGHT CART 30- 1340 - 000 -00 3774
* ** -CKS
LOGIS
DATA
ENTRY
10- 4233 - 160 -16
LOGIS
DATA
ENTRY
10- 4233 - 200 -20
LOGIS
DATA
ENTRY
10- 4233 - 420 -42
LOGIS
DATA
ENTRY
40- 4233 - 800 -80
LOGIS
DATA
ENTRY
50- 4233 - 820 -82
LOGIS
DATA
ENTRY
50- 4233 - 840 -84
LOGIS
DATA
ENTRY
50- 4233 - 860 -86
* ** -CKS
LONG LAKE FORD TRACT MUFFLER 10- 4540 -560- 56,96246 4532
* ** -CKS
MCCAREN DESIGNS TREES /FLOWERS /SHRUBS 30- 4660 - 783 -78 1967 4495
* ** -CKS
MARKETING FACTORS SERVICES 50- 4201 - 820 -82
MARKETING FACTORS SERVICECS 50- 4201 - 840 -84
MARKETING FACTORS SERVICECS 50- 4201 - 860 -86
w AV
* ** -CKS
4 4 t
1989 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT
338M27
11/21/89
296.80
338M27
11/21/89
457.60
338M27
11/21/89
323.75
338M27
11/21/89
79.00
338M27
11/27/89
81.20
338M27
11/21/89
20.00 -
338M27
11/21/89
200.00
338M27
11/21/89
20.00
338M27
11/21/89
213.70
338M27
11/21/89
292.81
338M27
11/21/89
297.30
338M27
11/27/89
427.05
2,669.21 *
* * * * **
338M35
11/21/89
220,257.78
220,257.78 *
* * * * **
338M42
11/21/89
63.49
338M42
11/21/89
94.54
338M42
11/28/89
2,710.12
338M42
11/21/89
256.45
3,124.60 *
* * * * **
338M46
11/28/89
24.95
338M46
11/21/89
53.47
78.42 *
* * * * **
338M51
11/27/89
848.00
848.00 *
* * * * **
338M58
11/21/89
32.91
32.91 *
* * * * **
338M68
11/27/89
265.13
265.13 *
* * * * **
338M76
11/21/89
113.47
113.47 *
* * * * **
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
MERIT
SUPPLY
CLEAN SUPPLYS
MERIT
SUPPLY
SNOW PLOW WAX
MERIT
SUPPLY
SNOW PLOW WAX
MERIT
SUPPLY
SUPPLIES
MERIT
SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
MERIT
SUPPLY
CLEAN SUPPLYS
MERIT
SUPPLY
CLEAN SUPPLYS
MERIT
SUPPLY
CLEAN SUPPLYS
MERIT
SUPPLY
CLEANER
MERIT
SUPPLY
BAIT /GREASE
MERIT
SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
MERIT
SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
12 -04 -89 PAGE 14
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4504 - 301 -30
10- 4504 - 318 -30
10- 4504- 318 -30
10- 4504 - 520 -52
10- 4504 - 645 -64
10- 4504 - 645 -64
10- 4504 - 645 -64
10- 4504 - 645 -64
10- 4512 - 375 -30
10- 4540 - 540 -54
28- 4512 - 702 -70
30- 4512 - 782 -78
22508
22814
22878
23030
23043
22508
22508
22508
22854
22817
23008
23031
3466
4102
4200
4632
4188
3466
3466
3466
4187
4107
4489
4549
* ** -CKS
METRO WASTE CONTROL SEWER SERVICE
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR
METZ BAKING CO
METZ BAKING CO
MIDWEST WIRE & STEEL
MILLIPORE
MN. CELLULAR TEL
MN. GLOVE
40- 4312 - 812 -80 7364
* ** -CKS
BLACTOP
BLACKTOP
CONSTRUCTION
BLACKTOP
10- 4524 - 301 -30 1103
10- 4524 - 301 -30 2969
28- 1300 - 001 -00 3085 1103
40- 4524 - 803 -80 2969
* ** -CKS
BREAD
BREAD
27- 4624 - 663 -66 8925
27- 4624 - 663 -66 8925
* ** -CKS
PLOW MARKERS 10- 4504 - 318 -30 19904 4448
* ** -CKS
LAB SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 482 -48 113663 3871
* ** -CKS
CAR PHONE 10- 4204 - 140 -14 807727
* ** -CKS
GLOVES 40- 4504- 803 -80 36907 4232
* ** -CKS
r
1989 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
12 -04
-89
PAGE 15
CHECK
NO. DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
#
MESSAGE
338M80
11/21/89
75.17
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
ADVERTISING
10- 4210- 140 -14
338M80
11/27/89
29.53
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
ADS FOR BIDS
10- 4210 - 140 -14
338M80
11/27/89
42.00
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
ADVERTISING
23- 4214 - 611 -61
91156
4588
338M80
11/21/89
19.80
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
PRINTING
23- 4600 - 611 -61
89305
166.50
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
338M85
11/21/89
18.00
MN. WANNER
MATERIAL /STEEL
10- 4504 - 560 -56
73669
4263
338M85
11/27/89
10.50
MN. WANNER
PLBG PARTS
10- 4540 - 646 -64
073731
4656
28.50 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
338M92
11/28/89
53.70
MONARCH MARKETING
OFFICE SUPPLIES
50- 4516 - 860 -86
240216
53.70 *
338M93
11/21/89
163.50
MOTOROLA
EQUIP REPLACE
10- 4901 - 420 -42
163.50 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
338M97
11/21/89
4,355.96
MPLS FINANCE DEPT.
WATER
40- 4640 - 803 -80
4,355.96 *
* * *R *1t
* ** -CKS
338NO3
11/21/89
840.00
MPLS SEWER & WATER
SERVICE REPAIR
40- 4248 - 801 -80
20226
4459
338NO3
11/21/89
84.00
MPLS SEWER & WATER
SERVICE REPAIR
40- 4248 - 801 -80
20226
4459
338NO3
11/21/89
84.00-
MPLS SEWER & WATER
SERVICE REPAIR
40- 4248 - 801 -80
20226
4459
840.00
(2 checks)
* * * * **
338N21
11/21/89
224.68
NAPA AUTO PARTS
TRANSPT
10- 4540 - 560 -56
570312 4199 * ** -CKS
338N21
11/21/89
8.64
NAPA AUTO PARTS
BATTERY CABLE
10- 4540 - 560 -56
570943
4264
338N21
11/21/89
41.72
NAPA AUTO PARTS
BEARING
10- 4540- 560 -56
571089
4240
338N21
11/21/89
112.38
NAPA AUTO PARTS
CLUTCH /BEARING
10- 4540 - 560 -56
570642
4209
387.42* �-t$2.74'
338N22
11/27/89
2.20
NATL GUARDIAN SYS.
ALARM SYSTEM
23- 4304 - 612 -61
161176
2.20
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
338N33
11/21/89
233.00
NELSON RADIO COMM
REPAIR WORK
10- 4620 - 560 -56
15448
4110
233.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
338N72
11/27/89
796.87
NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO
TIRES /TUBES
10- 4616 - 560 -56
796.87
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
338N82
11/21/89
20.26
NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY
COST /GOODS SOLD
23- 4624 - 613 -61
165994
3532
14P
Aw
1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 12 -04 -89 PAGE 16
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
338N82 11/21/89 40.41 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 165969 4328
60.67 *
* * * * ** * ** -CKS
338017
11/27/89
133.00
OFFICE PRODUCTS
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
095609
4420
338017
11/27/89
12.00
OFFICE PRODUCTS
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
095905
11/28/89
338017
11/27/89
78.00
OFFICE PRODUCTS
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
095711
4420
338017
11/21/89
32.00
OFFICE PRODUCTS
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
095330
4316
CASH
MEETING
255.00 *
338P36
11/28/89
5.70
PETTY
CASH
* * * * **
10- 4206 - 500 -50
338P36
11/28/89
2.25
PETTY
CASH
* ** -CKS
338024
11/21/89
89.00
OFFSET PRINTING
PRINTING
10- 4600 - 420 -42
30364
4297
338P36
11/28/89
89.00 *
PETTY
CASH
PARKING
10- 4208 - 200 -20
338P36
* * * * **
2.00
PETTY
CASH
PARKING
10- 4208 - 480 -48
338P36
* ** -CKS
338P11
11/21/89
68.00
PARK NIC MED CTR
HEARING TEST
10- 4201 - 300 -30
11/28/89
38.90
PETTY
CASH
68.00 *
10- 4504- 200 -20
338P36
11/28/89
12.68
PETTY
* * * * **
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 490 -49
338P36
11/28/89
11.90
PETTY
* ** -CKS
338P31
11/27/89
750.00
PETER COTTON
TRAINING
10- 4201 - 440 -44
CASH
4657
10- 4512 - 520 -52
338P36
750.00 *
16.54
PETTY
CASH
SUPPLIES
10- 4516- 600 -60
* * * * ** * ** -CKS
338P36
11/28/89
26.00
PETTY
CASH
CHAMBER LUNCHEON
10- 4202 - 140 -14
338P36
11/28/89
27.70
PETTY
CASH
PARKING
10- 4202 - 600 -60
338P36
11/28/89
110.15
PETTY
CASH
MEETING ADM
10- 4206 - 140 -14
338P36
11/28/89
12.00
PETTY
CASH
PARKING
10- 4206 - 260 -26
338P36
11/28/89
20.35
PETTY
CASH
MEETING
10- 4206 - 490 -49
338P36
11/28/89
5.70
PETTY
CASH
MEETING
10- 4206 - 500 -50
338P36
11/28/89
2.25
PETTY
CASH
PARKING
10- 4208 - 120 -12
338P36
11/28/89
6.60
PETTY
CASH
MILEAGE
10- 4208 - 160 -16
338P36
11/28/89
14.49
PETTY
CASH
PARKING
10- 4208 - 200 -20
338P36
11/28/89
2.00
PETTY
CASH
PARKING
10- 4208 - 480 -48
338P36
11/28/89
12.33
PETTY
CASH
MEETING COMPUTERS
10- 4212 - 510 -51
338P36
11/28/89
38.90
PETTY
CASH
SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 200 -20
338P36
11/28/89
12.68
PETTY
CASH
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 490 -49
338P36
11/28/89
11.90
PETTY
CASH
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
338P36
11/28/89
2.24
PETTY
CASH
KITCHEN SUPPLIES
10- 4512 - 520 -52
338P36
11/28/89
16.54
PETTY
CASH
SUPPLIES
10- 4516- 600 -60
338P36
11/28/89
18.00
PETTY
CASH
MTG EXP /CAMPBELL
12- 4206 - 434 -43
338P36
11/28/89
8.12
PETTY
CASH
MTG EXP /CAMPBELL
12- 4208 - 434 -43
338P36
11/28/89
12.00
PETTY
CASH
GC SUPPLIES
27- 1300 - 003 -00
338P36
11/28/89
23.02
PETTY
CASH
ARENA SUPPLIES
28- 4504 - 780 -78
382.97 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
338P40
11/21/89
28.45
PHOTO
FAST
GENERAL SUPPLIES
23- 4504- 611 -61 3348
28.45 *
* * * * ** * ** -CKS
• � �� fit.
a
1989 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
338P48
11/21/89
18.70
30- 4600 - 781 -78
5407
18.70 *
* * * * **
338P56
11/21/89
112.50
* ** -CKS
PLASTIC BAGMART
112.50 *
* * * * **
6381
4485
338P66
11/21/89
102.00
102.00 *
* * * * **
PONY EXP RELOADERS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
338R25
11/27/89
35.00
35.00 *
* * * * **
338R35
11/27/89
320.00
10- 4248 - 644 -64
10845
320.00 *
* * * * **
338R59
11/28/89
242.60
* ** -CKS
RICHFIELD PLUMB CO
242.60 *
* * * * **
7735
338R81
11/21/89
257.27
257.27 *
* * * * **
ROCHESTER MIDLAND
GENERAL SUPPLIES
338S15
11/21/89
156.92
338S15
11/21/89
117.35
274.27 *
* * * * **
RUBENSTEIN & ZIFF
CRAFT SUPPLIES
338519
11/21/89
646.65 $40-7$
338S19
11/21/89
8.60
655.25*655.9 *
* * * * **
SEARS
CONSTR BOX
338S27
11/21/89
135.76
338S27
11/21/89
15.31
10- 4580 - 301 -30
151.07 *
* * * * **
338S32
11/21/89
201.93 197-88-
CHECK REGISTER
12 -04 -89 PAGE 17
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
PIP PRINTING
OUTSIDE PRINTING
30- 4600 - 781 -78
5407
4626
* ** -CKS
PLASTIC BAGMART
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 507 -50
6381
4485
* ** -CKS
PONY EXP RELOADERS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 430 -42
* ** -CKS
RENTAL EQUIP & SALES
SAW REPAIR
10- 4248 - 644 -64
10845
4655
* ** -CKS
RICHFIELD PLUMB CO
CONNECTION /GAS MOTOR
27- 1300 - 005 -00
7735
* ** -CKS
ROCHESTER MIDLAND
GENERAL SUPPLIES
28- 4504 - 704 -70
3623
* ** -CKS
RUBENSTEIN & ZIFF
CRAFT SUPPLIES
23- 4588 - 611 -61
149986
4326
* ** -CKS
SEARS
CONSTR BOX
10- 4580 - 301 -30
3813
SEARS
TOOL BOX
10- 4580 - 301 -30
3980
* ** -CKS
SEELYE PLASTICS
REPAIRS
28- 4248 - 704 -70
156520
4275
SEELYE PLASTICS
POLY TUBING
40- 4540 - 803 -80
155649
4202
* ** -CKS
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
MATERIAL
10- 4504 - 343 -30
4236
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
MATERIAL
10- 4504 - 646 -64
3930
* ** -CKS
SOFTWARE FIRST
EQUIP REPLACE
10- 4901 - 470 -47
30198
1989 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
* * * * **
338S34
11/27/
338534
11/27/
338S34
11/27/
338S34
11/27/
338534
11/27/
338S34
11/27/
338534
11/27/
* * * * **
781.13 *
338S67
11/21/
* * * * **
3,125.00 *
338S72
11/21
* * * * **
338S77
11/27
338S77
11/27
338S77
11/27
338S77
11/27
338S77
11/27
338S77
11/27
338S77
11/27
338S77
11/27
338S77
11/27
338S78
11/27
338S78
11/21
338S78
11/21
338S78
11/21
338S78
11/21
* * * * **
338583
11/28
* * * * **
338S92
11/21
338S92
11/27
* * * * **
AMOUNT
201.93* '?-9*
89 7
73.24
89 8
80.24
89 2
26.34
89 4
43.81
89 4
4.16
89 5
529.33
89 2
24.01
781.13 *
89 3
3,125.00
3,125.00 *
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
SOUTHDALE FORD VALVE
SOUTHDALE FORD MUFFLER
SOUTHDALE FORD HANDLE ASSY
SOUTHDALE FORD REG ASY
SOUTHDALE FORD VALVEASSY
SOUTHDALE FORD TRUCK AXLES
SOUTHDALE FORD LAMP ASSY
STORE FRONT
STREICHERS
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
SUPERAMERICA
HUMAN SERVICES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PARTS /LABOR
PLATE
LAMP
FLY WHEEL
HOSE
HUB CAP
ABSOR
LENS
EMBLEM
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIRS
REPAIRS
FITTINGS
PARTS
GAS /OIL
SYSTEM SUPPLY SUPPLIES
SYSTEM SUPPLY COMPUTER PAPER
1
12 -04 -89 PAGE 18
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
10- 4540 - 560 -56
10- 4540 - 560 -56
10- 4540 - 560 -56
10- 4540 - 560 -56
10- 4540 - 560 -56
10- 4540 - 560 -56
222546 1666
223711 1666
223614 1666
223485 1666
222406 1666
222676 4503
222762 1666
10- 4201 - 504 -50 112312
10- 4504 - 420 -42 M65985
10- 4248 - 560 -56 92183
10- 4540 - 560 -56 117126
10- 4540 - 560 -56 116907
10- 4540 - 560 -56 116483
10- 4540 - 560 -56 117113
10- 4540 - 560 -56 116580
10- 4540 - 560 -56 116541
10- 4540 - 560 -56 116285
10- 4540 - 560 -56 116354
10- 4540- 646 -64 4581
28- 4248 - 702 -70 4478
28- 4248 - 702 -70 4400
40- 4540 - 803 -80 4254
41- 4504 - 900-90 4201
10- 4612 - 560 -56
10- 4504 - 510 -51 110594 4564
10- 4504 - 510 -51 110751 4631
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
STORE FRONT
STREICHERS
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
SUPERAMERICA
HUMAN SERVICES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PARTS /LABOR
PLATE
LAMP
FLY WHEEL
HOSE
HUB CAP
ABSOR
LENS
EMBLEM
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIRS
REPAIRS
FITTINGS
PARTS
GAS /OIL
SYSTEM SUPPLY SUPPLIES
SYSTEM SUPPLY COMPUTER PAPER
1
12 -04 -89 PAGE 18
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
10- 4540 - 560 -56
10- 4540 - 560 -56
10- 4540 - 560 -56
10- 4540 - 560 -56
10- 4540 - 560 -56
10- 4540 - 560 -56
222546 1666
223711 1666
223614 1666
223485 1666
222406 1666
222676 4503
222762 1666
10- 4201 - 504 -50 112312
10- 4504 - 420 -42 M65985
10- 4248 - 560 -56 92183
10- 4540 - 560 -56 117126
10- 4540 - 560 -56 116907
10- 4540 - 560 -56 116483
10- 4540 - 560 -56 117113
10- 4540 - 560 -56 116580
10- 4540 - 560 -56 116541
10- 4540 - 560 -56 116285
10- 4540 - 560 -56 116354
10- 4540- 646 -64 4581
28- 4248 - 702 -70 4478
28- 4248 - 702 -70 4400
40- 4540 - 803 -80 4254
41- 4504 - 900-90 4201
10- 4612 - 560 -56
10- 4504 - 510 -51 110594 4564
10- 4504 - 510 -51 110751 4631
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
-4►' .r.
12 -04 -89 PAGE 19
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
27- 4201 - 662 -61 30562 4015
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 440 -44 38341 4065
30- 4564 - 783 -78 38679 4569
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 644 -64
10- 4208 - 644 -64
* ** -CKS
27- 1300 - 002 -00 735616 4332
* ** -CKS
30- 4504 - 782 -78 033254 4418
40- 4504 - 801 -80 243352 4230
40- 4504 - 803 -80 32983 4261
* ** -CKS
10- 4612 - 560 -56 TI4438
* ** -CKS
23- 4588 - 611 -61 354500 4322
* ** -CKS
28- 4612 - 704 -70
* ** -CKS
10- 4514 - 520 -52 285155 4557
* ** -CKS
27-4248-663-66 10910 4665
* ** -CKS
27- 4208 - 661 -66
4w
1989 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK
NO. DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
338596
11/27/89
80.00
AMY SMITH
CLEANING
80.00
* * * * **
338T11
11/21/89
130.00
TESSMAN SEED & CHEM.
SEED
338T11
11/27/89
60.00
TESSMAN SEED & CHEM.
CHEMICALS
190.00
* * * * **
338T13
11/27/89
915.00
TOM HORWATH
FORESTRY
338T13
11/27/89
90.00
TOM HORWATH
MILEAGE
1,005.00
* * * * **
338T28
11/21/89
264.83
THOMPSON LUMBER CO.
REROOF PROJECT
264.83
* * * * **
338T40
11/21/89
34.11
TOLL COMPANY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
338T40
11/21/89
110.78
TOLL COMPANY
WELDING SUPPLIES
338T40
11/21/89
57.04
TOLL COMPANY
WELDING SUPPLIES
201.93
* * * * **
338T53
11/21/89
7,155.16
TRACY OIL
GASOLINE
7,155.16
*
* * * * **
338T66
11/21/89
52.44
TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT
CRAFT SUPPLIES
52.44
*
* * * * **
338V10
11/21/89
383.19
VALLEY INDUSTRIAL
PROPANE FUEL
383.19
*
* * * * **
338V15
11/21/89
501.85
VAN PAPER CO.
PAPER SUPPLIES
501.85
*
* * * * **
338V30
11/28/89
192.54
VANTAGE ELECTRIC
ELECTRIC REPAIRS
192.54
*
* * * * **
338W10
11/28/89
68.64
WALKER - MERWIN
MILEAGE
-4►' .r.
12 -04 -89 PAGE 19
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
27- 4201 - 662 -61 30562 4015
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 440 -44 38341 4065
30- 4564 - 783 -78 38679 4569
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 644 -64
10- 4208 - 644 -64
* ** -CKS
27- 1300 - 002 -00 735616 4332
* ** -CKS
30- 4504 - 782 -78 033254 4418
40- 4504 - 801 -80 243352 4230
40- 4504 - 803 -80 32983 4261
* ** -CKS
10- 4612 - 560 -56 TI4438
* ** -CKS
23- 4588 - 611 -61 354500 4322
* ** -CKS
28- 4612 - 704 -70
* ** -CKS
10- 4514 - 520 -52 285155 4557
* ** -CKS
27-4248-663-66 10910 4665
* ** -CKS
27- 4208 - 661 -66
4w
1989 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT
68.64
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
12 -04 -89 PAGE 20
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* * * * **
338W28
11/21/89
297.73
WATER PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 900 -80
6365
4177
297.73 *
* * * * **
338W71
11/27/89
568.25
WINFIELD DEVEL.
R -ENT
10- 4201 - 627 -62
101637
568.25 *
* * * * **
338W81
11/21/89
12.00
WM H MCCOY
PROPANE
10- 4504 - 314 -30
5959
2169+
338W81
11/21/89
9.00
WM H MCCOY
PROPANE
10- 4504 - 314 -30
8602
2593
338W81
11/21/89
12.00
WM H MCCOY
PROPANE
10- 4504 - 314 -30
07853
2321
338W81
11/21/89
12.00
WM H MCCOY
PROPANE
10- 4504 - 314 -30
6601
2251
45.00
* * * * **
338ZOI
11/28/89
70.00
ZACKS IND CLEANING
SUPPLIES
27- 4504- 664 -66
06053
4352
70.00
* * * * **
338Z14
11/21/89
260.63
ZIEGLER INC
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
4260
338Z14
11/21/89
7.12
ZIEGLER INC
PARTS
10- 4540- 560 -56
4232
338Z14
11/21/89
174.51
ZIEGLER INC
CYLINDER
10- 4540 - 560 -56
4089
338Z14
11/21/89
37.40
ZIEGLER INC
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
4192
338Z14
11/21/89
167.00
ZIEGLER INC
CYLINDER
10- 4540 - 560 -56
3973
646.66
* * * * **
399Br211/21/89-
55.90
BRAEMAR ..L.,
-- 42-88 -504-50—
* * * * **
REFUND -
40- 38+38- 008 -90-
-i o . 8 9-�
* * * * **
209,145.24
^^^ 142.'6.
FUND 10 TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
1,245.12
FUND 12 TOTAL
COMMUNICATIONS
2,347.08
.2,8+ 98
FUND 23 TOTAL
ART CENTER
4,513.96
FUND 27 TOTAL
GOLF COURSE FUND
17,068.27
17�8 —.
FUND 28 TOTAL
RECREATION CENTER FUND
10,792.06
'^v-- 625.29
FUND 30 TOTAL
EDINBOROUGH PARK
247,381.48
FUND 40 TOTAL
UTILITY FUND
176.54
FUND 41 TOTAL
STORM SEWER UTILITY
9,276.52
FUND 50 TOTAL
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
325.00
FUND 60 TOTAL
CONSTRUCTION FUND
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
5.02,271.27* TOTAL
a
12 -04 -89 PAGE 21
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
-dw i •