Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-01-02_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 2. 1990 7:00 P.R. ROLLCALL I.. APPROVAL OF HRA MINUTES OF DECEMBER 18,,1989 II. AWARD OF BID.- Centennial Lakes - Residential Amenities III. ADJOURNMENT OF HRA EDINA CITY COUNCIL I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Council member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance : First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Report - Addition at 4515 Drexel Avenue III. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS IV. AWARD OF BIDS * A. Street Lights * B. Overhaul of Iron Removal Plant #4 * C. Five 1990 Police Patrol Vehicles * D. Golf Balls for Driving Range * E. Purchase of Unmarked Police Vehicle V. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Centennial Lakes Update - United Properties B. Scoping Document - I -494 Reconstruction Project C. Park Board - Jupiter and Beyond D. Tax Increment Districting E. Ethnic Celebration - January 21, 1990 VI. RESOLUTIONS Favorable rollcall vote by majority of quorum to pass. * A. Official Depositories Designation * B. Signatory Resolution * C. Facsimile Signatures VII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES VIII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Edina City Council January 2, 1990 IX. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS A. Letter - West Suburban Mediation Center X.' FINANCE * A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 01/02/90: Total $342,929.20 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Mon Jan 15 MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY - City Hall Closed Mon Jan 22 Regular Council Meeting Mon Jan 29 Joint Meeting - Council /School Board Mon Feb 5 .Regular Council Meeting Mon Feb 19 PRESIDENTS DAY - City Hall Closed Tues Feb 20 Joint Meeting - Council /Health Committee Regular Council Meeting Sat Mar 3 Strategic Planning Retreat Mon Mar 5 Regular Council.Meeting Mon Mar 19- Regular Council Meeting Tues Mar 20 Annual Dinner Meeting - Boards /Commissions 7:00 p.m. Council Room 6:00 p.m. Sch Bd Office 7:00 p.m. Council Room 6:00 p.m. Mgrs Conf Rm 7:00 p.m. Council Room 8:30 a.m. Braemar Clubhouse 7:00 p.m. Council Room 7:00 p.m. Council Room 6:00 p.m. Braemar Clubhouse MINUTES EDINA HOUSING AND - REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DECEMBER 18, 1989 Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Chairman Richards. MINUTES of the HRA Meeting of December 4, 1989 were approved as submitted 'by motion of Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Smith. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ACQUISITION OF KUNZ OIL /LEWIS ENGINEERING EXTENDED TO 3/30/90 Executive Director Gordon Hughes recalled that on October 2, 1989, the' HRA adopted a resolution concerning the acquisition of the Kunz Oil /Lewis Engineering properties for redevelopment purposes. The resolution contained two conditions. First, an acquisition could not occur until the HRA had signed and delivered a contract for redevelopment of the properties. Second, the resolution was valid and effective only until December 31, 1989. Director Hughes stated that, since .adoption of the resolution, he had met with representatives of Jerry's Enterprises and Opus Corporation on two occasions concerning the properties. He has been advised that Jerry's and Opus have now obtained options to both properties, subject to acquisition pursuant to the HRA resolution. Also, he had met with William Beard, Professional Ventures, Inc., concerning its potential interest in the development of the properties. Director Hughes said that, in accordance with the direction of the HRA, he had invited Mr. Beard to submit a written proposal. However, to date no proposal has been received and no other inquiries have been made concerning the subject properties. Director Hughes said that he believed Jerry's Enterprises and Opus Corporation are actively pursuing the redevelopment of the properties. However, a redevelopment agreement with these parties will not be signed and delivered by the end of the year. Therefore, staff would recommend that the resolution be extended until July 1, 1990 to provide a reasonable time for negotiating and - executing a redevelopment agreement. Following a brief discussion concerning the time period, Commissioner Kelly moved adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority that it hereby extends the provisions of the resolution adopted on October 2, 1989 relating to acquisition of certain property within the Grandview redevelopment area to March 30, 1990. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Commissioner Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice,. Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, the meeting was adjourned by motion of Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Paulus. Motion carried. Executive Director A. con REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: HRA FROM: GORDON HUGHES VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 DATE: January 2, 1990 AGENDA ITEM HRA II. ITEM DESCRIPTION: CENTENNIAL LAKES - RESIDENTIAL AMENITIES Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. LAKELAND NURSERY, INC. 1. $42,047.00 2. MONETTE CONSTRUCTION 2. 54,900.00 3. MASTERPIECE CONSTRUCTION 3. Incomplete Bid 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: LAKELAND NURSERY GENERAL INFORMATION: This bid is for various specialty items to be located in public areas around Centennial Lakes Condominiums. Items include benches, trellis, gazebo, and litter receptacles. Signature The Recommended'bid is X within budget not w Kenneth Rosland, City Wallin, xl� Director REPORT /RECOMMENDATION • �~�bFiroMj °v • ,eee To: Kenneth Rosland Agenda Item # II. A. From: Philip S. Dommer Consent ❑ Information Only 0 Date: January 2, 1990 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: 4515 DREXEL AVENUE ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance 0 Discussion Recommendation: Info /Background: The following three topics are discussed in this report as additional information on 4515 Drexel Avenue: I. The permit review process in this particular instance; II.. The policy for review of proposals by the Heritage Preservation Board; III. Examples of other projects interpreted in the same manner as the subject property. I. Permit Review Process at 4515 Drexel Avenue. The permit review process in this particular instance is the same process under which all single family construction projects are subject to. The following steps were taken: 1. The designer contacted the Planning Department and Building Department regarding applicable ordinances. 2. The designer prepared working drawings. 0 3. A contractor applied for a building permit on October 5, 1989. 4. The Building Department reviewed the plan. 5. The Planning Department reviewed the plan. 6. The Engineering Department reviewed the plan. 7. It was determined that the addition met all applicable ordinances including lot coverage where the addition is 5% below the 30% limit and height where the addition is 11 feet below the 30' average height limit. 8. A building permit was issued October 11, 1989. The only unusual aspect in this process occurred at Step Number 2. The designer came in and discussed the rear corner of the addition. This corner is the point of controversy in this case. The designer illustrated that whether the extreme corner of the addition were walled off as spoken of previously in Step 1 or made part of the closet with a slanted ceiling, the exterior of the addition, room size and alignment would not change for framing and architectural reasons. Because of this the designer was told it would be possible to store things in the rafter area. Since then, the determination has been reviewed and the contractor was informed that the rafter area should not be used as storage or closet and is being constructed with the closet ending at the 25' setback line as originally required. Attachment 1 a,b,c, illustrates the site plan and floor plans under the two scenario's. Attachment 2 illustrates the exterior corner in question under either scenario. II. Policy for Review by the Heritage Preservation Board (HPB) The Heritage Preservation Board was established along with the Heritage Preservation Overlay District, HPOD: The HPB has two primary functions 1. To study and investigate lands and buildings for inclusion in the HPOD. 2. To review proposals and make findings regarding the granting of permits for work at properties in the HPOD. A summary of the operation of the HPB and HPOD is included as Attachment 3. The subject property at 4515 Drexel Avenue is not zoned HPOD and therefore is not subject to review by the HPB. The Country Club District also is not zoned HPOD. The Country Club District as a whole is listed on the National Register of Historic Places as an example of one of the first planned, suburban communities. The significance of the district is relative to the development process of the area. Individual properties and changes to them or the district itself are not subject to review or regulation On occasion the Board of Appeals, as part of their variance review, has referred proposals to the HPB for comment. Since 1985 the Board of Appeals has reviewed 22 variance requests in the Country Club District. Three have been referred to the HPB for comment. III. Similarly Situated Interpretations. The City of Edina Zoning Ordinance requires that a five foot side yard and rear yard setback be provided for garages and that a 10 foot side yard setback and 25 foot rear yard setback be provided for single dwelling unit buildings. The boundary of a single dwelling unit building is interpreted to be the area of actual living space. Rafter areas and framing above and beside garages not used for actual living space are not considered part of the single dwelling unit building. This interpretation has been applied frequently and consistently by a variety of City Officials in a variety of City locations over many years. Attached are several recent examples of such similar interpretations. Since the City retains house plans for no more than two years, floor plans are not available for older examples. Summary The addition at 4515 Drexel Avenue South and the granting of a Building Permit by the City of Edina can be summarized as follows: 1. The permit review process was consistent with the requirements and procedures of the City. 2. The subject property is not zoned HPOD and is not subject to review by the HPB. 3. The addition is now being constructed within all applicable ordinances of the City of Edina as consistently interpreted. I -1 ATTACHMENT 1A 1 ATTACHMENT 1B �% - -- � -- - - -• 141 _q ,. SETS-4GK 1 I I I ,-; .� of r3.o• f,;�- ...._._d _�`� . uT i i+T l I U i4T 3 than .7 sa. ;-,. e; � I 1 `�� i' C.. �iur; I. ^:J ii 'f: �4` !:•':!::I�� .... �i. �! ��'---�— t � ' �. � . i � `•i i. i:�i �; �$ thin [J� �i�oalf:• i ..l� "., �- '-- -•—+ —' -�-- »- I I — '�— !�s Ac- - • ter/ , 'i ``, ..� ATTACHMENT 1C 26- �,C iv,wb 4p - — ' SETBACK LINE � } I�"��• i %`I ?I( Y ^ x4i•• 1 i � a. S[:� ��,:�:�i1( r!rt c:.,,c •!•%� �i � l i 1 floor. t It t. -NA las; than 5.7 so. -_ ~� �.�`�".. rut 1.�SS ii "f: �4'• �':!::1'f '! I -r ` �, I I . /,. • j �i 1. i ct !A' ;s it!. -_n 2T noce !n j ':;'d!�, [. ��- - T-,��a '1-• -��_ I 1 _ ',— <.:° s .Ns, II I i F S TA.P r S T Atli-. ATTACHMENT 2 ` ATTACHMENT 3 SM ARY OF OPERATION OF HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD AND HERITAGE PRESERVATION DISTRICT 1. The Board, with the Village Planning Director, Park Board and Environmental Quality Commission, will study and investigate lands and buildings within the Village to be considered for preservation. Their report will go to the Planning Commission. 2. The Planning Commission will review the report and submit its recommendation (favorable or unfavorable) to the Council, together with the Board's report and any comments by the Minnesota and Edina Historical Societies. 3. If the Commission favorable recommends inclusion of any property within the Heritage Preservation District, the Village Council will proceed to hold a rezoning hearing as in the case of other rezoning petitions. The Council may grant or deny the rezoning. 4. If rezoned to the Heritage Preservation District, the other zoning classi- fications applicable to the property continue, and the additional require- ments of the Historical Preservation District are imposed. 5. No remodeling, repairing, altering, moving, demolition or construction of any.improvement, or work on the land such as grading, may take place within the district without a permit. This includes interior work, unless the re- zoning ordinance specifically excludes interior work from the permit require- ments. 6. Permits are obtained by making application to the Building Official. He submits the application, together with additional information required by the ordinance, to the Planning Director. The director submits his report and recommendation to the Heritage Preservation Board. The Board studies the application and makes its written findings as to whether or not the work will materially impair the architectural or historic value of the building or land within the District. The Board has sixty days within which to submit its report,to the Planning Director. The permit is issued only upon approval of the Planning Director or if no disapproval is received within ninety days of the submission of the permit request to the Planning Director. The Plan- ning Director may not authorize issuance of any permit which is disapproved by the Board. 7. If a permit is denied, the application may be appealed to the Boa.rd.of Appeals and Adjustments and, in turn, the order of the Board of Appeals and Adjustments may be appealed to the Council. Appeals are taken, and hearings before the Board and Council are held, the same as under existing procedures. 8. The Council can also order the repair of any building or structure within the Heritage Preservation District. The procedure is substantially identical to that established for repair of dangerous and substandard buildings under Village Ordinance No. 471. 9. The Board will consist of eleven members appointed by the Mayor; with the Council's consent. They shall he residents of .the ►.1.] are tai.th the exception of the nominee of the Hennepin County Historical Sor:iety. Onn member shall be a member of the Planning Commission, one a member of the Parl: Board and one a member of the Edina Historical Society. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager FROM: Philip S. Dommer, Senior Planner DATE: January 2, 1990 SUBJECT: Verification of Lot Coverage and Dimensions at 4515 Drexel In October of this year the Edina Building Department reviewed the proposed addition at 4515 Drexel Avenue. A site plan is required as part of the permit application materials. The Building Department compared the site plan to the dimensions shown on the plat. A copy of both is attached. On November 9, 1989, an Edina Inspector verified the accuracy of the measurements in the field as part of the.re- quired footing inspection. This is a standard practice. The Inspector did not note any discrepencies. Lot Coverage Was Calculated As Follows: Lot Size (From Plat): 60 X 124.29 Lot Area: 7457.4 square feet Lot Coverage Permitted: 2237.22 square feet (30 %) Proposed Coverage: Existing House: 1008 square feet New Addition: 266 square feet Garage & Bedroom: 592 square feet 1866 square feet (25%) N cx T x �o 1 , I ..... ......� 12 t I 9 F VM I ( 10) e �. .41 50,1 I o 1 s r' t g • y Jam I 'bS r. r, !3 J / 31 I 'o l 4® .. ( 120) „l� , 1.0.0 ....I 5® s® 1 ( 122) 70 r.o. ® ®( 9) a 1 B (92 5` A 7 X504 R $ (124) $ 2e 1. r 5 7) $iR (9a pp W ( 92) I ..... i S (125) S Q 17 IA e ( 6 (95 r- (331 ! S (126) 1s 'R r 5l 15) J (96 m 2 L Q 9a: „ 3 (127) 25 A (97 _° 1 114) 1 �! A to C� e �! (98 ( 128) (95) $ z3) Si R rp ( 129) (96) 140 51 12) $R (Irr R 2 U •o cn $ v (97) CJ rr X 13 $ (131) 3 W 11 (1 3 T! 10 p 71 (98) R r. x I (I 9) 1r 1 R 's 0 ,y (99) '3 $ ( 133) ,9 (10) ...... . R 76: lj 11 � (100) $ (134) u, IT) $ rs 1� 1 ti 9 I t , 7 i I i i i I i I i ' AL I r� CD III - N • e a h . I a I \ m G•r. F.L.. - }r�.r � j .fL• r LJ• ss•>r a,e ° ley � � a - I ;�c....w •vs •.F / n•• l►�raMr / PRO�Ii GARA oa'�a� / .w..• F r� Survey For: MICHAEL NALLRT NODS • J �♦ DESCRIPTION: Lot 3, Block 1, OA[ PONDS OF 3 INTERLACHEN 2ND ADDITION Za i wi j I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by se or �•1 �' / / ..• under b direct supervision and that I as a duly Registered "no Land surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 22nd day of August, 1988. Building staked March 27, 1988. 'c • t•°.i • Q EGAN, FIELD 6 NOWAK,INC. yore CV ► ' % ♦ 1� \ • "j t�4' � by /7 `o �J !' Bruce M. Grivna y PQ Minnesota License No, 17253 r•_�.•� S �� • . Note: Bearings shown are on an assumed basis •�^ \ / 3� ZZ . �,•i wK IL 3'tiy - _ Dill... -. _.. -.. -. _.. �•% ✓:��Ya� ✓I f Imo- I�: _-- .-�1�fl.'� _- _ - I r- y, I[_II ►1 I . � ' _._ it - - -lf _ li !► = 1 � � . , � I � I i I ¢ FRONT C�� �4C� SLS\/A fi10 = - '-6 II = I N RIGHT I I I I n / i i� GO t:4 t/4' € 77 t�, / i WALL era �•.�- , _ • M.L r1oR. %Pt SO o` de :, ;arm t:,ID h II \\ r+ 0 ilD OMl! r L► L-L86q W ._..:catha5fnia \\ iPHW�� ,, \ �t t.r•; st.ci,,ns ..om „�ia•,Nt ncm:: , . ./ ;t nt0l2 Na:i J♦Y ' (,:� ,. , 111: � D Not In. n,aa 57 sg c Nc; i. 's Nan .; e.a.:inp hsiphL zll _ J• E, Nct j, s 20' cpam.mg wlQth. c' b• 1 'E t PucR fo / _ \ Ok r-Lw oo cam \ j , wcw �� \\ ��5'b w1 w/►u. tee• ' CY e• I ,9�• I b O t I fat J. I 9 � o of I o i ` ,11>:I °(6tZRAt(; T MoNKY UnW KfHOVE CON C PKI VEWA ( 1 I MaA CONC WALK WAY f WC *If AiK CONK COMP. � CNIMn� A[7t711"IDtt � KOV -PORCH_ _. I I Rvmov� EXTRi'IOR WA{.ir Ir — — — — — I Roof OVfK f{4N6 Llrt� Of ItfN ROOF sffWA7 r I IImf of rxls -fING ROOF III I uN1= OF Howe ► it I I a M 6orikf w4v. I CUn� DRIVIY f -;; I I t f;MOvE D aPT NEN FRof9'( t%N'fr\y: / F `RfMOVV Ek*f'H& FROtif Y(OOP I- WK WAY �� { tiFw FRONT S'f00PI MA50tlKY 14AP4 WIR Wki -- -NtiW AvTo VFO? OFF 4f PRIvif WRY (L-IM OF. pRIVE WAY W11ft off >7RoP 0ff)-->� C ICI TuNlrNetlS�TYP.� � � � II – I goy I I – I I I �- I lob I I . _ 0 211 f . N *i r � !ILUVA - - ��� Uju 1 � 1 f "C YZl e r w„ t air di .,..:. . .. • aiulR {i.i. ,cli ui' ■ �q t b rlir, , y!b' Ti v NO l WOO* UtrjDDUS fN'fK-q DOORS 8 f FWe" pOoRs A5 MAiid�h�TV S� $Y "Pr � M ko t- 56 Rt Pi COM L J • W/ ` H eA'f VO4 K GAZING. V r R I FY Ras W/ 'MANUr,4Cf JIZFR' (�iMIT6),(ON WmpoW fjgtioO A5 Notrip) iU1Np0U5 �O tjo-r p () 'fo NAVE IUIN170�1 NEAP �.00A'fEL� 71 =- 7' -8''. H16 "N) r�ariv��r_ T vFEK 10 PKoV1DE 5N0r PMINO Fog AFPRoVkFt,)R At. :A 1"M& OtiN /,AR( )P (firiN��M WINt�OWc, FA14CP WI? Fnl�v r, 4vAGr pooK (UNITE) MASo}IRY 510op5 -frf .�c�s; gRtcK i'�v�K: 40 t1�TCH LIINV;vR STuNt; _ i - -- �,ivin/rw ARE.r9 Screacr l.Mrr' I (�gaA6E 56rDACC I„INriT R� R119 64r vrof5 Hil G Lin£ of £x 15'f I N6 ROO P -.TYP rteu Rooi% SNINGI -fS e- I� ITI I 1 I � I i I -Ti- MOVI WINVOw VAY.% . I I fAl5fIMG ! ifoHk i I�— ���OratE OCTR�ON WINflOU @ 6ARAGE 90dK - ow u M ft , H k Y fV 96 WlSlIrl& y,Wr I ItT +. s x w�1 y,-T ' i 1 1 1+— — Ll E = Lin£ of £x 15'f I N6 ROO P -.TYP rteu Rooi% SNINGI -fS e- I� ITI I 1 I � I i I -Ti- MOVI WINVOw VAY.% . I I fAl5fIMG ! ifoHk i I�— ���OratE OCTR�ON WINflOU @ 6ARAGE 90dK - ow u M ft , H k Y fV 96 WlSlIrl& y,Wr I to�0o I I �IK6oP�ftl 6 -' U. 0 , x 01 C, \. Io To MLOW , * 'Nrvue Rell. 2-9'i ,�HL FLuSil s J 4%(0 Past w/ 04 M4. (e L1 . ;p 7- t.o�t /Ll�c�tY Y r r r �PPeD, ALr. FtuSH ��, •i ' ' I•II'��NL ef4LJW,JO15TaH ; I,i G � (AI R r I I J r O o Rf movf r WIN90W HN 4k MIRROR 4 1MU- paor_ IN PW2T, Wlri0oW (-O. �YEf;I FY OvoF. H T) C) 4� Commo -f v� n0 C106- C✓rao NCO r . . i�EF10Vl: EXIStiNG UINCd7l� MOO (�ARgbG �E�-OW L-4 II z nRCla I b_ I z d l I l �t- 11 1, r: :, i l:.l I.. •. �I I n O o Rf movf r WIN90W HN 4k MIRROR 4 1MU- paor_ IN PW2T, Wlri0oW (-O. �YEf;I FY OvoF. H T) C) 4� Commo -f v� n0 C106- C✓rao NCO r . . i�EF10Vl: EXIStiNG UINCd7l� MOO (�ARgbG �E�-OW L-4 II z nRCla I b_ I z d l I l 1- Edge of l- Dil-urninouS Co" o 3> � I V EXISTING HOUSE Cq�2.1) 3) NORTH 130.00 c911, X883.11) (88e. 18) (893.8) V 55.94 � 22. Co 7 I � C884.4� � I I 24 "0 OAK N 110 4'I 5 N In I� ,` '4t F 1 v I V 874 . Co) / 5.167 C--7 . • o H o ul 0 1 I PROPOSED Ili OAK d 20" • OAK m \ I HOUSE 23.83 r 33 — — — — — — li 11 i � � •I 5" OAK (�Z 4 — J OAKS `O (bO?L) ri 18"•OAK 24" OAK* j / �e80.e� _ LOT r 24" OAK• I O N 20" 1233 " 1 C 878.9) OAK • 1 V OAK • c:j I p 14" • OAK 0878.6) PROPOSED \\ 24" • OAS: d •10" OAK Lo _ -1k I 01733 (679.&) DRIVEWAY ��� N ��op oP iror� i i oc L3enchmar,k \o �Z1 GARAGE n S M. H. I 90 F° h0 U1 West Inv. ' -ZO "••OAKS I (� El e v. 60 1 1 A(p U0?v, eX (8 i �Slq.(o) (_879 8o) 53.94 Top of . 3.8 3 Iron 4=4003'04" e = 50.00 v Ul (8 �) r�2z.�- "3 76-00 on P ,0 NOR � �o� ►� /28• ll a�5 42' ,QOZ)r O �I N 0 it r w V CL N 1 � w � I V EXISTING HOUSE Cq�2.1) 3) NORTH 130.00 c911, X883.11) (88e. 18) (893.8) V 55.94 � 22. Co 7 I � C884.4� � I I 24 "0 OAK N 110 4'I 5 N In I� ,` '4t F 1 v I V 874 . Co) / 5.167 C--7 . • o H o ul 0 1 I PROPOSED Ili OAK d 20" • OAK m \ I HOUSE 23.83 r 33 — — — — — — li 11 i � � •I 5" OAK (�Z 4 — J OAKS `O (bO?L) ri 18"•OAK 24" OAK* j / �e80.e� _ LOT r 24" OAK• I O N 20" 1233 " 1 C 878.9) OAK • 1 V OAK • c:j I p 14" • OAK 0878.6) PROPOSED \\ 24" • OAS: d •10" OAK Lo _ -1k I 01733 (679.&) DRIVEWAY ��� N ��op oP iror� i i oc L3enchmar,k \o �Z1 GARAGE n S M. H. I 90 F° h0 U1 West Inv. ' -ZO "••OAKS I (� El e v. 60 1 1 A(p U0?v, eX (8 i �Slq.(o) (_879 8o) 53.94 Top of . 3.8 3 Iron 4=4003'04" e = 50.00 v Ul (8 �) r�2z.�- "3 76-00 on P ,0 NOR � �o� ►� /28• ll a�5 42' ,QOZ)r O �I N �r J i �•'6♦ d? .r `mob Y.)�' .•'K,� Jai � "�' ";'v;� :." +'t5N•. �3��. �• -e_ •Ir • � 'P .c� j •�,• T +Ord ��� '`�i,� ��� ,.•',p��`)•� r)CJ E T 13 fiC IC C iiyF • l� y� � o'a -� -.L • ii•• 1 t i, i ! 9� S 3 •/v� t��`, .. - '.•_ � =� - -_ / i� ��- ,��.aSS.'1 yam. y�3 - �r ,. - •� � `� . %,. � � nor / I /'li - . (�1 O, �,;...• to •rte _ Z4r)V 4� '-r �•).�%. O �, L .. tr 11-k .1-t e4 goo. bAUISGR Ia, sr'INS I-Ala la 6VA Nil . -1 -- . . - - - ------- I -.0 ?-Ems Hcr- '—� & hit c) -4 L2c�r-- I -Toro o FciJrrrv(— 2 5�—G1 ION G &L1 K-A Co Llv►N6, AReA �Pr13Ac.K ► 7b G AR06C SF.rBAC.K Tye GARAGE — BRw, \/P -NCGa rjc21Z 1q' oG. VrAr 2,44 '� � Ja. C, boll 0•0. rR�dYGO P;.- T f - - N �d� Z � Q W _Z Q U W a T M ti CD r rte' REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00 DATE: January 2, 1990 AGENDA ITEM Iv.A. ITEM DESCRIPTION: 250 Watt High Pressure Sodium Replacement Heads Company Amount of Quote or &d 1. J.H. Larson Electric 1. $ 8,440.00 2. United Electric 2. $ 10,600.00 3• 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: J.H. Larson Electric $ 8,440.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: These are street light replacement heads for City -wide use and will be funded through the capital replacement fund. N Sig ur The Recommended bid is within budget no Public Works - Streets Kenneth Rosland, City Manager A. ° REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00 DATE: 2 January, 1990 IV.B. AGENDA ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION: Iron Removal Treatment Plant #4 Overhaul _Companv Amount of Quote or &d j. Layne Minnesota Company $ 10,320.00 2, Flo - Covery Systems, Inc. 2. $ 10,945.00 3. 3, 4. 4, 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Layne Minnesota Company $ 10,320.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: The iron removal treatment plant #4 was operating inefficiently due to the media needing replacement and tanks needing rebuilding. This is part of the planned capital expense from the capital plan for 1990 and funds for this repair will come from the Utility Fund. This is Phase One of the overhaul program which involves removing the filter media, inspection and a report on what needs to be rebuilt. Signatur The Recommended bid is — X — within budget not Public Works - Utility Dept. Departm nt but VNallin,nance Director Kenneth Rosland, City i -- i REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: . Mayor and City Council FROM: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 DATE: December 19, 1989 Agenda Item IV.C. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Five (5) 1990 Full -Size Police Pursuit Vehicles Company Amount of Quote or Bid �• Rathert Chevrolet 1. $ 66,462.75 4183 Haines Road 2. Duluth, Minnesota 55811 2' 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Low Bidder - Rathert Chevrolet. GENERAL INFORMATION: ,Replacement vehicles (per State of Minnesota Purchasing Cooperative). Acceptable replacement vehicles to be acquired through cooperative bidding. Costs are approximately 3.93% greater than 1989 purchases. Units will be maintained as first line patrol vehicles for a minimum of two (2) years. Signature The Recommended bid is within budget not within] Edina Police Department Rosland, City Manager 4 �1 /mil L� O' REQUEST FOR PURCHASE '"tbn.nnw••'� TO: Mayor Richards and Council Members FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director, Park and Recreation Department VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR 'PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5000 DATE: December 21, 1989 AGENDA ITEM IV. D. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Golf balls for driving range (1500dz . ) Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Spalding 1 8,250.00 2. Wittek Golf Supply 2. 9,000.00 3. Werre Betzen 3, 9,750.99 4. 4 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Spalding at $5.50 /dz or $8,250.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: 1500 dozen range balls with Braemar Golf Course logo on them. S The Recommended bid is within budget not within r) Kenneth Rosland, 6ity Manager Director REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CRAIG G. SWANSON, CHIEF OF POLICE VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 DATE DECEMBER 28, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: IV.E. .ITEM DESCRIPTION: One (1) 1990 Unmarked-Mid-Size Police vehicle Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. RATHERT CHEVROLET 1. $ 11,377.00 4183 Haines Road 2' 2 Duluth, MN .55811 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Low Bidder -- Rathert Chevrolet GENERAL INFORMATION: Replacement vehicle (per State of Minnesota Purchasing Cooperative) Acceptable replacement vehicle to be acquired through cooperative bidding. Replacement for 1981 Chevrolet. ^G Edina Police Signature The Recommended bid is within budget not within Kenneth Department \ 4 JoWallin , City Mana er ,;6 Agenda Item V.A i UNITED PROPERTIES DEVELOPMENT COMPANY January 2, 1990 Mr. Gordon Hughes Housing and Redevelopment Authority City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 RE: Centennial Lakes Master Plan Dear Mr. Hughes: On January 2, we will be presenting to the HRA a proposed modification of the approved master plan for Centennial Lakes. The new proposal involves a redefined use for the designated parcel "E" in the south end of the site, which was originally shown as residential use on the approved master plan. This brief letter will describe the rationale for our request. As has been widely publicized, the Twin Cities office market is seriously overbuilt. In fact, the market in the suburbs has essentially collapsed, and we are now seeing historically high vacancy rates (over 20 %) and effective net rental rates equivalent to those which prevailed 10 years ago. These poor conditions are forcing office projects to fail economically and are making new projects infeasible. We believe that these market conditions are temporary and that a correction will occur some time within the next three to five years. However, the current environment makes it impossible to build any substantial amount of new speculative office space, both because the market is depressed and such speculative projects are not financable anyway. As a consequence of the market conditions, new development of office space is only feasible when induced by a major tenant requirement. We have had a number of large tenants (in the range of 50,000 square feet in size) which we feel we could have proposed to locate within Centennial Lakes, but the office building scheme which is currently shown on the master plan has only buildings that are 250,000 square feet to 350,000 square feet in size, far in excess of any one tenant's need. Even with a 50,000 square foot lead tenant, constructing this large of a building would require that we speculate on over 200,000 square feet of vacant space which is not possible. Therefore, we have not been able to respond to the current market 3500 West 80th Street Suite 100 Minneaoolis. MN 55431 (612) 831 -1000 -2- with the existing master plan as it relates to office use. Therefore, we have taken a look at the master plan and have concluded that we would like to create an opportunity to build a couple of smaller buildings on the site while still retaining the opportunity to build the high -rise office buildings when market conditions improve. The revised plan indicates two small office buildings (between 80,000 to 115,000 square feet) on Parcel E. It is likely that these buildings will be in the four to five story range in height, typically considered to be low -rise buildings. A large lead tenant could be attracted to this plan, thereby reducing or possibly eliminating the amount of speculative space which would need to be built to accommodate the requirement. It is our plan to make the design of the low -rise buildings.compatible with the existing plan for the high -rise office buildings. There are several observations and considerations which are being addressed: 1. Although we have not yet done any financial analysis related to the tax increment program, it is hopeful that any new commercial development on the site will have a positive marginal impact on the tax increment district. The surprise turn of events regarding the homestead credit makes additional tax increment very important. Additionally, all of us would like to generate additional tax increment to - support additional moderate income housing and to complete the public park improvements. The existing residential plan for Parcel E would likely be a "user "'of tax increment where the revised use would be a "generator ". 2. The revised plan actually reduces density on the site, thereby reducing overall traffic demands. We have taken approximately 200,000 square feet of the approved 1.2 million square feet of office space and moved it over into Parcel E. We have not increased the amount of total office space on the site, but rather removed the mostly high -rise residential from Parcel E and replaced it with low -rise office. 3. The low -rise design of Parcel E should not impact negatively on the existing Edinborough condominiums to the east. 4. The availability of office parking at this location provides more convenient parking to the planned amphitheater across 76th Street in the public park. 5. All of the proposed projects for Phase I of Centennial Lakes have been commenced according to plan, and only the office development is facing delays. -* -3- Our objective on January 2 is to make the HRA aware of the use change being proposed for Parcel E. Additional steps including a complete financial analysis with staff and a modification to the Indirect Source Permit will be required. At this point, we are only seeking the.HRA's endorsement of the change in use for Parcel E. Very truly yours, Boyd Sto �r Pres dent BBS /jas- cc: HRA Members Peter Jarvis - BRW, Inc. Kenneth Rosland - City of Edina REPORT /RECOMMENDATION JOB 11 To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # . °'B' From: Francis Hoffman Consent ❑ City Engineer Information Only Fx—] Date: 2 January, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: I -494 Scoping Document %❑ To Council Public Hearing Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: None - Information Only. Info /Background: Attached is a memorandum announcing completion of the I -494 Scoping Document and public hearing at the Edina Community Center on January 17, 1990. Copies of the official document are available in the Engineering Department. h ���WESOT 0 Q° LT OF Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan District Transportation Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 .Oakdale Office, 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota 55128 Golden Valley Office, 2055 North Lilac Drive, Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422 December 19, 1989 To Whom it May Concern: Reply to 612- 593 -8405 Telephone No. RE: Transmittal of I -494 Scoping Document Attached is the Scoping Document for the I -494 Reconstruction Project. This Scoping Document describes the alternatives for the reconstruction of I -494 from the Minnesota River in Bloomington to I- 394/TH 12 in Minnetonka and the potential impacts of those alternatives. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will be prepared for the project. The purpose of this scoping document is to help define the alternatives and issues that will be studied in the EIS. In the appendix of this Scoping Document is a draft Scoping Decision. The purpose of the draft Scoping Decision is to indicate the tentative decisions on the alternatives and issues to be studied in the EIS. These decisions may be changed based on comments recieved on the Scoping Document. The proposed project would involve the addition of one or two lanes in each direction on I -494 and reconstruction of the interchanges to provide additional capacity and improve safety. The alternative of designating one of the additional lanes proposed for I -494 for vehicles with two or more persons is also proposed for study in the EIS. In addition, it is proposed that the EIS study a no -build and Transportation System Management alternative. The Scoping comment period will run through Wednesday, January 24, 1990. Comments on the Scoping Document may be submitted in writing to Craig Robinson, Corridor Manager, Minnesota Department of Transportation, District 5, 2055 North Lilac Drive, Golden Valley, Minnesota, 55422. A public scoping meeting will also be held on January 17, 1990, at 7:00 PM at the Edina Community Center, 5701 Normandale Road, Edina, Minnesota. Both oral and written comments will be accepted at the public scoping meeting. Written comments should address the accuracy of the information presented in the Scoping Document and the alternatives and issues proposed for study in the EIS. Sincerely, GLm(.D�jZ/�G i /James T. Povich Assistant District Engineer � � MINNESOTA 1990 Ar. Equal Opportunity Employer o e • Rropi". • ieeB REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland Agenda Item # y - C - From: Robert Koj etin Consent ❑ - Information Only ❑ Date: January 2, 1990 Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Jupiter and Beyond El To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance U1 Discussion Recommendation: Info /Background: At the special council meeting held on December.18, 1989, between the City Council and the Park Board, the Council asked that the Jupiter and Beyond Plan be placed on the agenda'for discussion at the January 2,, 1990, Council meeting. The process for adoption of the Jupiter and Beyond Plan would include approval by the Park Board; afterwhich it should be considered by the Planning Commission and the Council as an amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Commission and Council actions must occur at public hearings which could be scheduled at the Council's discretion. , r' /1N��r\ o e �- f \N�ORPORt�t�O/ iBBB REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # v.D.. From: GORDON L. HUGHES Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: JANUARY 2, 1990 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: 0 To Council TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTING Action F-1 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance 0 Discussion Recommendation: Info /Background: See attached memorandum's of December 27, 1989, and December 14, 1989. M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 27, 1989 TO: Kenneth Rosland City Manager FROM: Gordon L. Hughes HRA Executive Director SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY WORK PROGRAM - ESTABLISHMENT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS FOR RETAIL AREAS In accordance with the Council's request, we have developed a preliminary plan and schedule for establishing tax increment financing (T.I.F.) districts comprising certain retail areas. These areas include 44th /France, Wooddale & Valley View Road and 70th & Cahill. All other retail areas in Edina currently fall within existing T.I.F. districts. T.I.F. DISTRICT ESTABLISHMENT My memo to you of December 14, 1989, (copy attached) describes some of the important legal and financial considerations of tax increment financing. Based on these considerations, I recommend the following strategy o Establish T.I.F. districts as soon as possible, preferably by March 19, 1990, (reminder: County and School District must receive our plans to, create the districts no later than February 19, 1990). o Establish economic development, T.I.F. districts for all retail areas. After establishment, attempt to upgrade all or4part of some of these districts to redevelopment districts. (Economic development districts are much easier to establish within the recommended time frame. Redevelopment districts are more difficult to establish but are more advantageous from our perspective). o Attempt to establish T.I.F. districts such that increments can be "pooled" among all these districts. In this way, increments from one district can be used to benefit another district. (Some possible disadvantages to such pooling need to be analyzed prior to implementation). We believe that the initial work required to establish the T.I.F. districts can be accomplished by staff and the City Attorney. It should be noted, however, T.I.F. district establishment requires the preparation of a plan describing proposed development activities, public costs, and impacts on other taxing jurisdictions. Due to the proposed schedule, we will attempt to describe these plans as generally as possible using generous public cost estimates. Memorandum: Kenneth Rosland December 27, 1989 Page Two DEVELOPMENT /REDEVELOPMENT PLANS During the process of establishing the T.I.F. districts, we will start work on preparing more detailed development and redevelopment plans. This work will include contacts with tenants and property owners in the district, preparation of land use alternatives and public improvement plans, and more detailed finance plans. This work will require assistance of the hiring or contracting the following: • Planning consultant(s) to prepare land use and public improvement plans • Project manager to interface with tenants and property owners, planning consultants, and potential developers /redevelopers. This individual could be a part -time contractual employee. PLANNING COSTS At this time, we do not have estimates for costs of establishing the districts. Such costs must be borne by the City until tax increments are generated by the districts. Such increments can then be used to repay City costs. ;1 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 14, 1989 TO: Kenneth Rosland City Manager FROM: Gordon Hughes HRA Executive Director SUBJECT: COMMERCIAL AREA REDEVELOPMENT You mentioned that on December 16, 1989, the Council will discuss, among other things, commercial area redevelopment activities. It is my understanding that some members of the Council believe the City should encourage and participate in redevelopment initiatives in our retail districts, particularly Grandview, Cahill /70th Street, 44th /France and Wooddale/Valley View. Assuming that the City has not imposed regulations or ordinances which have discouraged private redevelopment, then the issue, in my view, is whether or not the City is willing to offer financial assistance to facilitate redevelopment. In that tax increment financing is the only significant fiscal tool available for such public financing, I thought an overview of tax increment financing would be useful. TYPES OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS Three types of tax increment financing districts are permitted by state law: o Housing Districts o Redevelopment Districts o Economic Development Districts The Grandview Area, 50th & France and Edinborough /Centennial Lakes are presently located within redevelopment districts. Southdale /Galleria is located in an economic development district. We have no housing districts. Redevelopment and housing districts may remain in existence for 25 years. Therefore, they possess the greatest potential for tax increment collections. However, stringent statutory tests make these districts difficult to establish. To qualify as a redevelopment district, 20% of the buildings in the proposed district must suffer structural defects or a combination of difficiencies in utilities and facilities, and other defects or deficiencies of a.significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance. An additional 30% of the buildings must require renovation or clearance to remove conditions such as inadequate street layout, incompatible land uses, overcrowding, or obsolescence. Although we have not analyzed these districts in detail, it may be difficult to meet these statuatory tests in the Cahill /70th Street, 44th Street /France Avenue, and Wooddale/Valley View Road retail areas. It should be noted that the statuatory tests have become more stringent since the 50th & France district was established. Housing districts, of course, would be of r: limited value for commercial area redevelopment unless a major change in land use is desired. Even so, state law now requires that beneficiaries of _. such districts meet _very stringent income tests. If we cannot meet the tests for redevelopment districts, and if housing districts are not appropriate for the situation, then we are limited to creating economic development districts. Economic development districts have two restrictions that limit the potential for significant redevelopment activities. 1) Districts are limited to 8 -10 years in duration rather than 25 years as with redevelopment or housing districts. 2) The base value of such districts is not absolutely frozen, rather it increases annually at the average inflation rate of the district during the prior five years. Both of these restrictions limit the economic potential of such districts, especially in cases where a relatively immediate addition of new taxable value does not occur. TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT ESTABLISHMENT I will not attempt to outline all of the steps in tax increment district establishment. The Council should be aware, however, that it requires more than simply adopting a resolution. A plan and program must be prepared for each district which includes a proposed budget, a description of the public costs involved, a projection of anticipated tax increments, and an assessment of impacts on other taxing jurisdictions. Such jurisdictions are entitled to review and comment on these assessments prior to district establishment. FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS As mentioned earlier, certain restrictions limit the viability of economic development districts. Even with the more liberal requirements of redevelopment districts, if additional taxable value is not added to the district during flat inflationary times, relatively few increments are collected to repay public costs. For example, the 50th & France district may not have produced tax increments needed to repay the HRA's debt were it not for double digit inflation during the early years of the district. Generally speaking, the financial success of a tax increment district in a retail area is dependent upon an increase in the intensity of development and the resulting increase in tax revenues. Of the three district mentioned, 70th Street and Cahill probably offers the greatest tax increment potential because of the opportunity to capture the Cahill school property prior to redevelopment. Valley View/Wooddale and 44th & France suffer from the problem of, on one hand, having little or no vacant sites to capture, and on the other hand, having difficulty meeting the test for a •redevelopment district. �.J LEGISLATIVE CHANGES Tax increment financing continues to be an unpopular fiscal tool in the view of many legislators. The 1989 property tax law established additional restrictions regarding tax increment use. It is very likely that further restrictions will be considered in the coming legislative session. With regard to future restrictions, the Council should be aware of.the following possibilities. First, key legislators have become very critical of economic development districts. Many of us believe that a serious effort will be undertaken to prohibit such districts altogether. Therefore, if redevelopment districts cannot be justified for our retail areas, then I suggest that economic development districts be established as soon as possible. Second, legislation was introduced in the 1989 session which would have impacted existing tax increment districts with outstanding debt. Up until then, staff believed that such retroactive restrictions would not be considered. However, key legislators now seem interested in such restriction. Therefore, we can no longer be assured that existing districts are safe from legislative changes that impact our ability to repay public costs. Third, certain legislative changes indirectly affect existing tax increment districts. For example, the 1988 tax law changes relating to state paid homestead indirectly and apparently inadvertently impacted the Centennial Lakes /Edinborough district. OTHER FUNDING SOURCES - HRA LEVY As mentioned earlier, tax increment financing is the only significant tool available for public financing of retail redevelopment. However, the HRA could impose an HRA levy in addition to the City's normal levy. This BRA levy can be made outside of the City's normal levy limit imposed by the State. According to my information, the annual BRA levy cannot exceed .0131% of our taxable market value. This would total about $350,000 annually that could be targeted at retail redevelopment. The Council, of course, should understand that this would constitute an increase in our local levy against Edina taxpayers. SUMMARY 1. Tax increment financing is virtually the only significant fiscal tool available to assist retail redevelopment. However, the HRA could impose a levy against all taxable property in the City which could be targeted to retail redevelopment. 2. Redevelopment districts (i.e. 25 year districts) may be difficult to establish at 44th & France, Wooddale & Valley View, and 70th & Cahill due to the statutory tests that must be met. Economic development districts (8-10 year districts) are possible for all retail districts. Such districts should be established as soon as possible because of anticipated legislative restrictions. 3. Tax increment districts, especially economic development districts, rely upon an increase in development intensity to produce sufficient increments for repayment of public costs. This is especially true during flat inflationary times. V 4. The legislature continues to consider additional restrictions for tax _ increment financing. Some of these restrictions may be retroactive in nature and, therefore, could adversely impact tax increment districts which existed prior to passage of the restrictions. A. eK En J � �o ' � • ,N�bAPOMT�G� ihas REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & Council Members From: Susan Wohlrabe Date: January 2, 1990 Subject: ETHNIC CELEBRATION Recommendation: Agenda Item # y. E. Consent ❑ Information Only Fx—] Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion That the Council review the attached material from Noah Hurley, Chair of the Human Relations Commission. Noah will be at the Council Meeting to speak on behalf of the Steering Committee and the Ethnic Celebration planned at Braemar on Sunday, January 21. Info /Background: See attached. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor Richards & Council Members FROM: Noah Hurley, Chair - Edina Human Relations Commission SUBJECT: EDINA COMMUNITY MEETING - SUNDAY, JANUARY 21, 1990 DATE: January 2, 1990 This memo is a reminder to you that your presence at the Edina Community Meeting at Braemar on January 21, 1990, at 2:00 PM is greatly appreciated. The Steering Committee has done an outstanding job in preparation of this event, and they should all be highly commended: Dorie Barman Barb Galligher Betsy Flaten Betty Wickre Tom Oye Mavis Klefsaas Peter Meyers Ardis Wexler Margaret Wong I applaud you for involving the City of Edina in this special event; however, I was disappointed that Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s name was inadvertently omitted. The date chosen -- January 21 - -is in celebration of his birth date. NH /sw Attachment EDINA COMMUNITY MEETING "WE SHARE THE DREAM: AFFIRMING OUR ETHNIC DIFFERENCES" Sunday, January 21 2:00 P.M. Braemar Club House Sponsored by The City of Edina The Edina Human Relations Commission The Edina Public Schools Edina Community Education Services Keynote Speaker Dr. Richard Fowler Professionally licensed consulting psychologist formerly on the Graduate Faculty of the University of Minnesota Department of Family Social Sciences What do demographic projections on ethnic change tell us about the future? How are ethnic differences affirmed as unique contributions to our community and country? How do we encourage the strengths of our diversity so that our differences be- come contributors to the whole? Following the keynote address... Talk with other community members about strategies... and personally reflect about how our changes in population will lead to positive experiences. Please register me for the Edina Community Meeting on January 21. Name Telephone Address Mail to: Susan Wohlrabe Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 OR Call: Susan Wohlrabe 927 -8861 C- l DATE: TO: December 22, 1989 Asian American Residents FROM: Human Rights Commissions of Richfield, Bloomington, Eden Prairie and Edina Families of the Asian American community living in Richfield, Bloomington, Eden Prairie and Edina are invited to take part in their city's ethnic celebrations being held on Sunday afternoon, January 21,11990. People of.all ethnic backgrounds will be gathering at various locations within their city as indicated below. We will share our differing cultures, get better acquainted and learn more about each others customs and traditions. Each city is planning their event and the - program may differ. Most will feature ethnic foods of various countries. Some will have entertainment from different cultures and some will have organizations that have exhibits to display. It should be enjoyable and we urge you to attend. For additional information, call the person listed for your city. The starting time and location of celebration is noted as follows: Richfield: House of Prayer Church 76th and Chicago Ave. S., 4:00 PM Karin Batchelder, 861 -9716 Gordon Anderson, 869 -3184 Bloomington: In various homes throughout city, 4:00 PM Shelley Duran, 881 -5811 Eden Prairie: High School Commons.; 17185 Valley View Road, 5 :00 -7:00 PM Karen Michael, 937 -2262 Edina: Braemer Clubhouse 6364 Dewey Hill Rd, 2:00 PM Susan Wohlrabe, 927 -8861 Extension 203 00 .�v91A.1'lr Cn O ' •'N�bRR7Mt�V� BBB REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER Agenda Item # VI .A. From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Consent Information Only ❑ Date: DECEMBER 27, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: DEPOSITORIES FOR To Council CITY FUNDS Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Council adoption of a Resolution Designating Depositories for Public Funds of the City of Edina. Info /Background: At the first regular Council Meeting of the year, the Council should select official depositories for public funds of the City. A copy of the recommended Resolution is attached. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DEPOSITORIES BE IT RESOLVED that the First Edina National Bank, Edina, MN, First Southdale National Bank, Edina, MN, Americana State Bank of Edina, Edina, MN, Southwest Fidelity State Bank, Edina, MN, First National Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis, MN, Marquette Bank Minneapolis, Minneapolis, MN and Norwest Bank MetroWest, Edina, MN, authorized to do banking business in Minnesota, be and hereby are designated as Official Depositories for.the Public Funds of the City of Edina, County of Hennepin, Minnesota, until January 1, 1991, ADOPTED this 2nd day of January, 1990. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS . CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 2, 1990, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 3rd day of January, 1990. City Clerk Ile 4 c h o .�y • ~C16; t1°V • ieae REPORTIRECOiV MENDATION To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER From: 11ARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Date: DECEMBER 27, 1989 Subject: SIGNATORY RESOLUTION Recommendation: Agenda Item # °1'B' Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance. ❑ Discussion Council adoption of a Signatory Resolution authorizing the Mayor, Manager and Treasurer of the City to act in the transaction of banking business. Info /Background: At the first regular.Council Meeting of the year, the Council should adopt a Signatory Resolution which authorizes the persons holding office as Mayor, Manager and Treasurer of the City to act for the'City in the transaction of any banking business with the named banks. A copy of the recommended Resolution is attached. -. SIGNATORY RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED that the persons holding office as Mayor, Manager and Treasurer of the City of Edina, be, and they hereby are, authorized to act for this municipality in the transaction of any banking business with First National Bank, First Southdale National Bank, Americana State Bank of Edina, Southwest Fidelity State Bank----First National Bank of Minneapolis, Marquette Bank Minneapolis and Norwest Bank MetroWest (hereinafter referred to as the "Bank ") from time to time and until written notice to any Bank to the contrary, to sign checks against said accounts, which checks will be signed by the Mayor, Manager and City Treasurer. Each Bank is hereby authorized and directed to honor and pay any checks against such account if signed as above described, whether or not said check is payable to the order of, or deposited to the credit of, any officer or officers of the City, including the signer or signers of the check. ADOPTED this 2nd day of January, 1990. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 1, 1990, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 3rd day of January, 1990. City Clerk ro o -�0 �RPOMZ�V� less REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KEN ROSLAND , MANAGER Agenda Item # From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Consent Information Only ❑ Date: DECEMBER 27, 1989 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: FACSIMILE SIGNATURES R❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Council adoption of a Resolution Authorizing Use of Facsimile Siguatures by Public Officials. Info /Background: At the first regular Council Meeting of the year, the Council should authorize the use of facsimile signatures by the Mayor, Manager and Treasurer on checks, drafts, warrants, vouchers, etc., or other orders of public funds deposited with the City's banks. A copy of the recommended Resolution is attached. RESOLUTION ADOPTED AUTHORIZING USE OF FACSIMILE SIGNATURES BY PUBLIC OFFICIALS RESOLVED that the use of facsimile signatures by the following named persons: FREDERICK S. RICHARDS - MAYOR KENNETH E. ROSLAND - CITY MANAGER JOHN WALLIN - CITY TREASURER on checks, drafts, warrants, warrant - checks, vouchers or other orders of public funds deposited in First Edina National Bank, First Southdale National Bank, Americana State Bank of Edina, Southwest Fidelity State Bank, First National Bank of Minneapolis, Marquette Bank Minneapolis and Norwest Bank MetroWest, be and hereby 'is approved, and that each of said named persons may authorize said depository banks to honor any such instrument bearing his facsimile signature in such form as he may designate and to charge the same to the account in said depository bank upon which drawn as fully as though it bore his manually written signature and that instruments so honored shall be wholly operative and binding in favor of,said depository bank although such facsimile signature shall have been affixed without his authority. ADOPTED this 2nd day of January, 1990. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, Marcella M. Daehn, duly appointed City Clerk for the City of Edina, Hennepin County, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of "Resolution Authorizing Use of Facsimile Signatures by Public Officials" with the original thereof as recorded in the Minutes of the Edina City Council held on Tuesday, January 2, 1990, and that the same is a true and correct copy of said original record,-and that said Resolution was adopted by said City Council at said meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 3rd day of January, 1990. -1- City Clerk AUTHORIZATION OF FACSIMILE SIGNATURES BY PUBLIC OFFICIALS: We, Frederick S. Richards, Kenneth E. Rosland, and John Wallin, being the Mayor, City Manager and.City Treasurer, respectively, and being duly authorized to sign checks, drafts, warrants, warrant - checks, vouchers and other orders on public funds thereof deposited in the above named DEPOSITORY BANKS, do hereby certify that the facsimile impressed or appended on this page is a facsimile of our signatures in the form which may be used on any such instrument in place of our. manually written signatures, and we hereby authorize said depository banks to honor any such instrument bearing the facsimile of our signatures in said form and to charge the same to the account of said public body in said depository bank upon which drawn as fully as though it bore our manually written signatures. Instruments so honored shall be wholly operative and binding in favor of said depository bank although such facsimile signature shall have been affixed without authority. WITNESS: -2- Mayor City Manager City Treasurer 1 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 01 -02 -90 PAGE CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 002700 12/27/89 45.72 TOM GARDNER SPRINKLER HEAD 10- 2010 - 000 -00 45.72 * 002701 12/27/89 270.95 DALE LUNDGREN SWEATERS 30- 2010 - 000 -00 270.95 * 002702 12/27/89 50.00 NIKOLA KOSTICH REFUND 10- 2010 - 000 -00 50.00 * 002703 12/27/89 5,332.60 AIM ELECTRONICS SCOREBOARDS 60- 2010 - 000 -00 7055 4806 5,332.60 * 002704 12/27/89 20.00 MN DEPT OF AG LICENSE RENEWAL 10- 4202 - 640 -64 20.00 * 002705 12/27/89 92.16 FRANCIS CALLAHAN MILEAGE 10- 2010 - 000 -00 92.16 * 002706 12/27/89 41.75 MN AUTO DAMAGE APP ESTIMATE 10- 2010 - 000 -00 46933 5087 41.75 * 002707 12/27/89 149.64 VIKING ID PRODUCTS DECALS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 163155 4742 149.64 * 002708 12/27/89 300.00 TERRENCE KEHOE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 440 -44 300.00 * 002709 12/27/89 300.00 WILLIAM HANSON CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 440 -44 300.00 * 002710 12/27/89 300.00 JOEL RADJENOVICH CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 440 -44 300.00 * 002711 12/27/89 300.00 JAMES ROBINSON CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 440 -44 300.00 * 002712 12/27/89 150.00 ALLEN ROTHE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 440 -44 150.00 * 002713 12/27/89 150.00 RICHARD HELMER CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 440 -44 150.00 * 002714 12/27/89 150.00 RICHARD VERNON CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 440 -44 150.00 * 002715 12/27/89 150.00 WILLIAM BOWLER CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 440 -44 150.00 * 002716 12/27/89 150.00 LEROY LISK CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 440 -44 150.00 * 002717 12/27/89 150.00 RICHARD MYRE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 440 -44 150.00 * 002718 12/27/89 150.00 WILLIAM LUTTS CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 440 -44 1 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 01 -02 -90 PAGE 2 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 150.00 * 002719 12/27/89 150.00 GREGORY SMEGAL CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 440 -44 150.00 * 002720 12/27/89 150.00 STEPHEN LANDRY CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 10- 4266- 440 -44 150.00 * 002721 12/27/89 150.00 RONALD SAMUELSON CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 440 -44 150.00 * 002722 12/27/89 150.00 JOHN MALONEY CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 440 -44 150.00 * 002723 12/27/89 150.00 JAMES SINGLETON CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 440 -44 150.00 * 002724 12/27/89 150.00 JAMES JULKOWSKI CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 10 -4266- 440 -44 150.00 * 002725 12/27/89 150.00 ROBERT LAWSON CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 440 -44 150.00 * 002726 12/27/89 150.00 ANDREW MEDZIS CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 440 -44 150.00 * 002727 12/27/89 150.00 DAVID RADATZ CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 440 -44 150.00 * 002728 12/27/89 150.00 PATRICK RUNNING CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 440 -44 150.00 * 002729 12/27/89 144.76 DOUGLAS BAGLEY CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 440 -44 144.76 * 002730 12/27/89 150.00 BRUCE GATES CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 440 -44 150.00 * 002731 12/27/89 150.00 JAMES SMITH CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 440 -44 150.00 * 002732 12/27/89 150.00 JOSEPH STRUZYK CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 440 -44 150.00 * 002733 12/27/89 150.00 DARRELL TODD CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 440 -44 150.00 * 002734 12/27/89 151.65 MARTIN SCHEERER CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 440 -44 151.65 * 002735 12/27/89 63.00 STEPHEN NESSER ART WORK SOLD 23- 2010 - 000 -00 63.00 * 002736 12/27/89 231.00 BRYAN MOON ART WORK SOLD 23- 2010 - 000 -00 231.00 * K 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 01 -02 -90 PAGE CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. #.MESSAGE 002737 12/27/89 26.25 VICKI LUND ART WORK SOLD 23- 2010 - 000 -00 26.25 *. 002738 12/27/89 206.00 JEAN HAEFELE ART WORK SOLD 23- 2010 - 000 -00 206.00 002739 12/27/89 43.40 NORMA HANLON ART WORK SOLD 23- 2010 - 000 -00 43.40 002740 12/27/89 129.50 NANCY GRIMSBEY ART WORK SOLD 23- 2010 - 000 -00 129.50 002741 12/27/89 21.00 CHERI DOYLE ART WORK SOLD 23- 2010 - 000 -00 21.00 * 002742 12/27/89 22.40 SANDRA SHAUGHNESSY ART WORK SOLD 23- 2010 - 000 -00 22.40 * 002743 12/27/89 24.50 DONNA LAPORTE ART WORK SOLD 23- 2010 - 000 -00 24.50 * 002744 12/27/89 113.23 BETH TUTTOILMONDO ART WORK SOLD 23- 2010 - 000 -00 113.23 * 002745 12/27/89 63.00 CY TURNBLADH ART WORK SOLD 23- 2010 - 000 -00 63.00 * 002746 12/27/89 30.80 BETTY THOMPSON ART WORK SOLD 23- 2010 - 000 -00 30.80 * 002747 12/27/89 26.60 MONICA SULLIVAN ART WORK SOLD 23- 2010 - 000 -00 26.60 * 002748 12/27/89 27.93 BARBARA PETT ART WORK SOLD 23- 2010 - 000 -00 27.93 * 002749 12/27/89 78.40 ROSIES RAGE ART WORK SOLD 23- 2010 - 000 -00 78.40 * 002750 12/27/89 84.00 JEAN GRAPP ART WORK SOLD 23- 2010 - 000 -00 84.00 * 002751 12/27/89 44.45 ED ZINN ART WORK SOLD 23- 2010 - 000 -00 44.45 * 002752 12/27/89 31.50 HELEN VAN WINKLE ART WORK SOLD 23- 2010 - 000 -00 31.50 * 002753 12/27/89 21.70 BETTY BELL PEDDIE ART WORK SOLD 23- 2010 - 000 -00 21.70 * 002754 12/27/89 22.40 FLORENCE PAULSON ART WORK SOLD 23- 2010 - 000 -00 22.40 * 002755 12/27/89 391.66 MOLLIE PAULSON ART WORK SOLD 23- 2010 - 000 -00 14 K 4 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 01 -02 -90 PAGE CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 002755 12/27/89 217.11 MOLLIE PAULSON PERSONNEL SERV 23- 2010 - 000 -00 608.77 * 002756 12/27/89 11,355.74 PRECISION LANDSCAPE TREE REMOVAL 10- 2010 - 000 -00 1643 11,355.74 * 002757 12/27/89 18.00 CONNER PLUMBING REFUND 10- 2010 - 000 -00 18.00 * 002758 12/27/89 495.00 SHADAWN FENCE CO BROOMBALL GOALS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 5156 002758 12/27/89 495.00 SHADAWN FENCE CO BROOMBALL GOALS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 5157 990.00 * 002759 12/27/89 2,812.25 OUTSIDE SERVICES STUMP REMOVAL 10- 2010 - 000 -00 1644 2,812.25 * 002760 12/27/89 42.60 STERLING FENCE CO FENCE 10- 2010 - 000 -00 9540 4854 42.60 * 002761 12/27/89 5.00 DIANE SANKEY GAS 10- 2010 - 000 -0.0 002761 12/27/89 8.50 DIANE SANKEY LICENSE TABS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 002761 12/27/89 1.58 DIANE SANKEY MERCHANDISE 10- 2010- 000 -00 002761 12/27/89 45.00 DIANE SANKEY MEETING EXPENSE 10- 2010- 000 -00 002761 12/27/89 24.50 DIANE SANKEY MUD FLAPS 10- 2010- 000 -00 002761 12/27/89 10.50 DIANE SANKEY PROPANE 40- 2010 - 000 -00 95.08 * 002762 12/27/89 55.20 ART GOKEY MILEAGE 40- 2010 - 000 -00 55.20 * 002763 12/27/89 6.24 JACKIE ONISCHUK MILEAGE 10- 2010 - 000 -00 6.24 * 002764 12/27/89 105.06 DEWEY HILLS W CONDOS REFUND 10- 2010 - 000 -00 105.06 * 002765 12/27/89 20.91 LYLE AXT CONCESSION PRODUCT 29- 2010 - 000 -00 20.91 * 002766 12/27/89 150.00 MN DEPT OF HEALTH PERMIT FEE 40- 4201 - 800 -80 150.00 * 002767 12/27/89 20.00 JANET CANTON MILEAGE 10- 2010 - 000 -00 20.00 * 002768 12/27/89 29.75 SALLY DISTRIBUTORS GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 2010 - 000 -00 31588 5039 29.75 * 002769 12/27/89 75.00 STEVE BUDAS PERFORMANCE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 75.00 * 002770 12/27/89 37.28 AIRSIGNAL INC PAGER SERVICE 10- 2010 - 000 -00 403660 4502 002770 12/27/89 19.58 AIRSIGNAL INC PAGER SERVICE 10- 2010 - 000 -00 403660 4502 002770 12/27/89 9.32 AIRSIGNAL INC PAGER SERVICE 12- 2010 - 000 -00 403660 4502 002770 12/27/89 50.12 AIRSIGNAL INC PAGER SERVICE 40- 2010 - 000 -00 403660 4502 4 k s 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 01 -02 -90 PAGE 5 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 116.30 * 002771 12/27/89 2,891.00 HYLAND SKI AREA SKI LESSONS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 2,891.00 * 002772 12/27/89 179.00 C.D. PUBLICATIONS SUBSCRIPTION 10- 4204 - 140 -14 98EGR2 179.00 * 002773 12/27/89 453.25 JH LARSON ELEC LUMINAIRE 60- 2010 - 000 -00 866054 2463 453.25 * 002774 12/27/89 106.00 ILLBRUCK INC ACCOUSTIC MAT 10- 2010 - 000 -00 124063 3459 106.00 * 002775 12/27/89 360.00 MN POLLUTION CONTROL SEMINAR 40- 4202 - 809 -80 360.00 * 002776 12/27/89 37.36 ROBERT FORDER REFUND 40- 2010 - 000 -00 37.36 * 002777 12/27/89 190.35 STEPHEN HOENACK REFUND 40- 2010 - 000 -00 190.35 * 002778 12/27/89 904.20 DIESEL INJECTION DIESEL PUMP 10- 2010 - 000 -00 8752 4783 904.20 * 002779 12/27/89 275.00 MAAO DUES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 275.00 * 002780 12/27/89 105.28 RUTH SCHMOLL PETTY CASH 10- 2010 - 000 -00 105.28 * 002781 12/27/89 123.10 WILLIAM C HANSEN BREAKFAST 10- 2010 - 000 -00 123.10 * 002782 12/27/89 409.00 SYNDISTAR INC FIRE VIDEO 10- 2010 - 000 -00 368720 5045 409.00 * 002783 12/27/89 25.00 SESAC INC LICENSE 28- 4204 - 701 -70 25.00 * 002784 12/27/89 50.00 ALCO CAPITAL GENERAL SUPPLY 28- 4504 - 702 -70 101645 50.00 * 002785 12/27/89 506.26 BLEVENS CONCESSION COST OF GS 28- 2010 - 000 -00 04724 4921 506.26 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 002A11 12/27/89 282.11 ACE SUPPLY STACK PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 105208 4992 282.11 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 002A17 12/27/89 590.62 ADS TO GO ADVERTISING 50- 2010 - 000 -00 EDA018 4 01 -02 -90 PAGE 6 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 2010 - 000 -00 EDA018 50- 2010 - 000 -00 EDA018 * ** -CKS 30- 4288 - 782 -78 190654 5040 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 151226 10- 2010 - 000 -00 951221 * ** -CKS 28- 2010 - 000 -00 44405 5023 * ** -CKS 30- 2010 - 000 -00 31398 5000 * ** -CKS 30- 2010 - 000 -00 30- 2010 - 000 -00 30- 2010 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 79426 4613 10- 2010- 000 -00 78250 4613 10- 2010 - 000 -00 77098 4588 * ** -CKS 50- 2010 - 000 -00 50- 2010 - 000 -00 50- 2010 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 97916 4525 10- 2010 - 000 -00 97917 4457 23- 2010 - 000 -00 98524 4696 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 002A17 12/27/89 590.62 ADS TO GO ADVERTISING 002A17 12/27/89 590.62 ADS TO GO ADVERTISING 1,771.86 * k k k* k k 002A21 12/27/89 185.50 ADT SECURITY SYS. SERVICE CONTRACT 185.50 * kkkkk k 002A49 12/27/89 55.14 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 002A49 12/27/89 10.00 AMERICAN LINEN LAB TOWELS 65.14 * kkkkk 002A76 12/27/89 224.10 ASPLUND COFFEE COST OF GS 224.10 * kkkkk k 002A85 12/27/89 487.88 AUDIO VISUAL WHSE GENERAL SUPPLIES kkkkk k 487.88 002605 12/27/89 125.23 BACH -BILL REIMBURSEMENT 002805 12/27/89 90.97 BACH -BILL OFFICE SUPPLIES 002605 12/27/89 22.79 BACH -BILL GENERAL SUPPLIES 238.99 kkkkk k 002B18 12/27/89 238.16 BATTERY WAREHOUSE BATTERY 002818 12/27/89 119.08 BATTERY WAREHOUSE BATTERY 002B18 12/27/89 77.78 BATTERY WAREHOUSE BRAKE PADS 435.02 kkkkk 002B27 12/27/89 321.50 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DEL 002B27 12/27/89 612.00 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DEL 002627 12/27/89 619.00 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DEL 1,552.50 kkkkkk 002B32 12/27/89 118.00 BEST LOCK OF MPLS LOCK SET 002832 12/27/89 6.60 BEST LOCK OF MPLS KEYS 002B32 12/27/89 54.65 BEST LOCK OF MPLS KEYS & CORES 179.25 kkkkk k 002B72 12/27/89 20.65 BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE MTG EXPENSE 4 01 -02 -90 PAGE 6 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 2010 - 000 -00 EDA018 50- 2010 - 000 -00 EDA018 * ** -CKS 30- 4288 - 782 -78 190654 5040 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 151226 10- 2010 - 000 -00 951221 * ** -CKS 28- 2010 - 000 -00 44405 5023 * ** -CKS 30- 2010 - 000 -00 31398 5000 * ** -CKS 30- 2010 - 000 -00 30- 2010 - 000 -00 30- 2010 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 79426 4613 10- 2010- 000 -00 78250 4613 10- 2010 - 000 -00 77098 4588 * ** -CKS 50- 2010 - 000 -00 50- 2010 - 000 -00 50- 2010 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 97916 4525 10- 2010 - 000 -00 97917 4457 23- 2010 - 000 -00 98524 4696 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 w ko 1990 CITY OF EDINA PAGE 7 CHECK REGISTER # CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 10- 2010 - 000 -00 08160 20.65 * 8443 1045 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 23- 2010 - 000 -00 097220 002877 12/27/89 1,678.60 BRAUN ENG TESTNG INC PROF ENG SERV 10- 2010 - 000 -00 1,678.60 * * ** -CKS * * * * ** S06537 4855 002C01 12/27/89 359.40 C & S DISTRIBUTING COST OF GS 002C01 12/27/89 14.70 C & S DISTRIBUTING COST OF GS 374.10 * * * * * ** 002C08 12/27/89 1,320.12 CARLSON LK ST EQUIP. HYD PUMP REPAIR 1,320.12 * * * * * ** 002C31 12/27/89 49,591.50 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMM HEALTH SERV 002C31 12/27/89 1,487.50 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON EMP ASSISTANCE 51,079.00 * * * * * ** 002C33 12/27/89 20.50 CITY OF EDINA WATER 20.50 * * * * * ** 002C44 12/27/89 351.50 COCA COLA BOTTLING COST OF GS 351.50 * * * * * ** 002D85 12/27/89 1,190.75 DUFFEY PAPER CO. PAPER 1,190.75 * * * * * ** 002E02 12/27/89 262.42 E KRAEMER & SONS INC FILL MATERIAL 262.42 * * * * * ** 002E20 12/27/89 85.00 ECOLAB PEST ELIM. SERVICE CONTRACT 85.00 * * * * * ** 002E33 12/27/89 14.00 EDINA CHAM OF COM CHAMBER LUNCH 14.00 * * * * * ** w ko * ** -CKS 27- 2010 - 000 -00 01 -02 -90 PAGE 7 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 925626 4917 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 08160 * ** -CKS 40- 2010 - 000 -00 8443 1045 * ** -CKS 23- 2010 - 000 -00 097220 4751 23- 2010 - 000 -00 097345 4751 10- 2010 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 S06537 4855 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 10042 10- 2010 - 000 -00 10041 * ** -CKS 27- 2010 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS 28- 2010 - 000 -00 546857 1338 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 925626 4917 * ** -CKS 40- 2010 - 000 -00 8443 1045 * ** -CKS 30- 2010 - 000 -00 42399 5153 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS AMOUNT 300.00 300.00 * 21.00 21.00 * 286.25 25.00 311.25 * 202.50 54.97 140.44 35.64- 362.27 * 40.00 40.00 * 5,194.00 27,829.00 2,188.00 35,211.00 * 1,070.00 1,070.00 900.00 900.00 30.96 735.00 765.96 126.00 126.00 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR EMPLOYEES CLUB FRED VOGT & CO. GEN. COMMUNICATIONS GEN. COMMUNICATIONS GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. GUSTAVE LARSON HARRIS HOMEYER CO. HARRIS HOMEYER CO. HARRIS HOMEYER CO. HENN CTY SHERIFF HENN TECH CENTER HORWATH -TOM HORWATH -TOM ITEM DESCRIPTION SUPPLIES REFUND MAINT CONTRACT STRAPS FIXTURES ENCLOSURE ELEC PARTS FIXTURE PARTS INS PREMIUM INS PREMIUM INS PREMIUM RADIO RENTAL TRAINING MILEAGE FORESTRY WORK JERRYS PRINTING PHOTO COPYING J 01 -02 -90 PAGE 8 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4504 - 500 -50 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 32406 10- 2010 - 000 -00 59311 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 107506 4687 25- 2010 - 000 -00 322755 4759 25- 2010 - 000 -00 116804 4795 50- 2010 - 000 -00 117793 4462 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 S78388 4676 * ** -CKS 10- 4260 - 510 -51 10- 4260 - 510 -51 10- 4260 - 510 -51 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 5043 * ** -CKS 10- 4202 - 440 -44 020305 5044 * ** -CKS 10- 2010- 000 -00 10- 2010 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 8550 5107 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 002E75 12/27/89 * * * * ** 002F64 12/27/89 * * * * ** 002G24 12/27/89 002G24 12/27/89 * * * * ** 002G68 12/27/89 002G68 12/27/89 002G68 12/27/89 002G68 12/27/89 * * * * ** 002G94 12/27/89 * * * * ** 002H23 12/27/89 002H23 12/27/89 002H23 12/27/89 * * * * ** 002H33 12/27/89 * * * * ** 002H37 12/27/89 * * * * ** 002H79 12/27/89 002H79 12/27/89 * * * * ** 002J35 12/27/89 AMOUNT 300.00 300.00 * 21.00 21.00 * 286.25 25.00 311.25 * 202.50 54.97 140.44 35.64- 362.27 * 40.00 40.00 * 5,194.00 27,829.00 2,188.00 35,211.00 * 1,070.00 1,070.00 900.00 900.00 30.96 735.00 765.96 126.00 126.00 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR EMPLOYEES CLUB FRED VOGT & CO. GEN. COMMUNICATIONS GEN. COMMUNICATIONS GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. GUSTAVE LARSON HARRIS HOMEYER CO. HARRIS HOMEYER CO. HARRIS HOMEYER CO. HENN CTY SHERIFF HENN TECH CENTER HORWATH -TOM HORWATH -TOM ITEM DESCRIPTION SUPPLIES REFUND MAINT CONTRACT STRAPS FIXTURES ENCLOSURE ELEC PARTS FIXTURE PARTS INS PREMIUM INS PREMIUM INS PREMIUM RADIO RENTAL TRAINING MILEAGE FORESTRY WORK JERRYS PRINTING PHOTO COPYING J 01 -02 -90 PAGE 8 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4504 - 500 -50 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 32406 10- 2010 - 000 -00 59311 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 107506 4687 25- 2010 - 000 -00 322755 4759 25- 2010 - 000 -00 116804 4795 50- 2010 - 000 -00 117793 4462 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 S78388 4676 * ** -CKS 10- 4260 - 510 -51 10- 4260 - 510 -51 10- 4260 - 510 -51 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 5043 * ** -CKS 10- 4202 - 440 -44 020305 5044 * ** -CKS 10- 2010- 000 -00 10- 2010 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 8550 5107 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 01 -02 -90 PAGE 9 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * * * * ** * ** -CKS 002K35. 12/27/89 142.30 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER 10- 2010 - 000 -00 516738 4672 002K35 12/27/89 36.48 KNOX COMM CREDIT PLYWOOD 10- 2010 - 000 -00 524496 4976 002K35 12/27/89 56.68 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER 10- 2010 - 000 -00 524459 4989 002K35 12/27/89 9.48 KNOX COMM CREDIT MATERIALS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 524867 4878 002K35 12/27/89 37.80 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 28- 2010 7000 -00 492711 4954 002K35 12/27/89 24.04 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 28- 2010 - 000 -00 524498 5033 002K35 12/27/89 44.78 KNOX COMM CREDIT PUMPHOUSE SUPPLIES 40- 2010- 000 -00 524610 4965 002K35 12/27/89 46.63 KNOX COMM CREDIT PAINT 40- 2010 - 000 -00 524705 4851 398.19 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 002L04 12/27/89 9,769.00 LAHASS SNOW PLOW 10- 2010 - 000 -00 7745 3593 9,769..00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 002L28 12/27/89 542.29 LAWSON PRODUCTS STOCK WASHERS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 244341 4355 542.29 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 002L82 12/27/89 44.50 LYNDALE HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 2010 - 000 -00 312926 4953 44.50 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 002M27 12/27/89 93.20 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 28- 2010 - 000 -00 23254 4943 002M27 12/27/89 282.50 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 28- 2010 - 000 -00 23179 4733 002M27 12/27/89 327.08 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 2010 - 000 -00 23273 5027 702.78 * ** -CKS 002M29 12/27/89 274.98 MESSERLI & KRAMER AMBULANCE COLL 10- 2010 - 000 -00 002M29 12/27/89 619.15 MESSERLI & KRAMER AMBULANCE COLL 10- 2010 - 000 -00 002M29. 12/27/89 180.88 MESSERLI & KRAMER AMBULANCE COLL 10- 2010 - 000 -00 002M29 12/27/99 238.00 MESSERLI & KRAMER AMBULANCE COLL 10- 2010 - 000 -00 1,313 -.01 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 002M45' 12/27/89 144.65- MIDWEST FENCE FENCE 10- 2010 - 000 -00 54463 4956 144.65 002M46 12/27/89 18.46 METZ BAKING CO BREAD 27- 2010 - 000 -00 8925 18.46 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 002M68 12/27/89 136.16 MN. CELLULAR TEL. CAR PHONE 10- 2010 - 000 -00 807.727 002M68 12/27/89 85.67 MN. CELLULAR TEL. CAR PHONE 10- 2010 - 000 -00 376465 AMOUNT 221.83 * 28.47 28.47 * 2,395.00 2,395.00 * 4,802.46 4,802.46 * 117.59 117.59 * 75.00 75.00 * 488.70 499.00 987.70 * 208.31 208.31 * 230.00 230.00 * 107.66 413.00 142.41 663.07 * 42.48 89.28 131.76 * CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION MN. CONWAY MOTOROLA MPLS FINANCE DEPT. NATL GUARDIAN SYS. NFPA NO STAR WATERWORKS NO STAR WATERWORKS NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY PARK NIC MED CTR PRO INSTANT PRINT PRO INSTANT PRINT PRO INSTANT PRINT QUICK SERV BATTERY QUICK SERV BATTERY SEALS PORTABLE RADIO WATER ALARM DUES STOP BOX CAPS HYDRANT PARTS COST OF GS PRE -EMP EXAM PLBG PERMIT APP BLDG PERMIT CARDS HTG PERMIT APP FILTERS FILTERS 01 -02 -90 PAGE 10 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 140762 4070 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 4069 * ** -CKS 40- 2010 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS 28- 4304 - 702 -70 170126 * ** -CKS 10- 4204 - 440 -44 459084 5046 * ** -CKS 40- 2010 - 000 -00 34217 4784 40- 2010 - 000 -00 34216 4772 * ** -CKS 23- 2010 - 000 -00 752390 4752 10- 2010 - 000 -00 10- 2010 - 000 -00 10- 2010 - 000 -00 10- 2010 - 000 -00 10 -2010- 000 -00 10- 2010 - 000 -00 30343 30343 30343 33508 34144 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 4802 4802 4802 * ** -CKS 4589 4589 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE * * * * ** 002M70 12/27/89 * * * * ** 002M93 12/27/89 * * * * ** 002M97 12/27/89 * * * * ** 002N22 12/27/89 * * * * ** 002N37 12/27/89 * * * * ** 002N50 12/27/89 002N50 12/27/89 * * * * ** 002N82 12/27/89 * * * * ** 002P11 12/27/89 * * * * ** 002P84 12/27/89 002P84 12/27/89 002P84 12/27/89 * * * * ** 002Q20 12/27/89 002Q20 12/27/89 AMOUNT 221.83 * 28.47 28.47 * 2,395.00 2,395.00 * 4,802.46 4,802.46 * 117.59 117.59 * 75.00 75.00 * 488.70 499.00 987.70 * 208.31 208.31 * 230.00 230.00 * 107.66 413.00 142.41 663.07 * 42.48 89.28 131.76 * CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION MN. CONWAY MOTOROLA MPLS FINANCE DEPT. NATL GUARDIAN SYS. NFPA NO STAR WATERWORKS NO STAR WATERWORKS NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY PARK NIC MED CTR PRO INSTANT PRINT PRO INSTANT PRINT PRO INSTANT PRINT QUICK SERV BATTERY QUICK SERV BATTERY SEALS PORTABLE RADIO WATER ALARM DUES STOP BOX CAPS HYDRANT PARTS COST OF GS PRE -EMP EXAM PLBG PERMIT APP BLDG PERMIT CARDS HTG PERMIT APP FILTERS FILTERS 01 -02 -90 PAGE 10 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 140762 4070 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 4069 * ** -CKS 40- 2010 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS 28- 4304 - 702 -70 170126 * ** -CKS 10- 4204 - 440 -44 459084 5046 * ** -CKS 40- 2010 - 000 -00 34217 4784 40- 2010 - 000 -00 34216 4772 * ** -CKS 23- 2010 - 000 -00 752390 4752 10- 2010 - 000 -00 10- 2010 - 000 -00 10- 2010 - 000 -00 10- 2010 - 000 -00 10 -2010- 000 -00 10- 2010 - 000 -00 30343 30343 30343 33508 34144 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 4802 4802 4802 * ** -CKS 4589 4589 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT * * * * ** 002R35 12/27/89 72.90 72.90 * * * * * ** 002R81 12/27/89 28.68 28.68 * * * * * ** 002534 12/27/89 2,770.91 002534 12/27/89 24.76 002534 12/27/89 34.05 002534 12/27/89 108.08 * * * * ** 12/27/89 2,937.80 002536 12/27/89 1,108.70 * * * * ** 12/27/89 ^1,108.70 002561 12/27/89 15.00 002577- 12/27/89 15.00 * * * * ** 002577 12/27/89 3,649.66 002577 12/27/89 66.38 002577 12/27/89 13.46 002577 12/27/89 24.60 002577 12/27/89 3.90 002577 12/27/89 230.23 002577 12/27/89 249.60 002577 12/27/89 248.80 002577- 12/27/89 .22 002577 12/27/89 221.40. 002577 12/27/89 244.00 002577 12/27/89 2.56 002577 12/27/89 24.60 002577 12/27/89 .75 CLIP 10- 2010 - 000 -00 4,980.16 002578 12/27/89 312.35 002578 12/27/89 415.54 CHEVROLET CONVERTER 727.89 * * * * ** e CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION RICHFIELD PLUMB CO PLMG REPAIR • 01 -02 -90 PAGE 11 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 27- 2010 - 000 - 00.8543 5110 * ** -CKS SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO. BEER 50- 2010 - 000 -00 65771 * ** -CKS STATE TREASURER EXAM FEE " 40- 2010 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS SUBURBAN CHEVROLET BODY REPAIRS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS RUBENSTEIN &'ZIFF COST OF GS 23 -2010- 000 -00 153881 4750 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIRS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS SOUTHDALE FORD BODY REPAIR 10- 2010 - 000 -00 13513 4718 SOUTHDALE FORD AMMETER 10- 2010 - 000 -00 225065 SOUTHDALE FORD SEAL /WASHER 10- 2010 - 000 -00 225258 SOUTHDALE FORD PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 224316 * ** -CKS SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO. BEER 50- 2010 - 000 -00 65771 * ** -CKS STATE TREASURER EXAM FEE " 40- 2010 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS SUBURBAN CHEVROLET BODY REPAIRS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 6247 3968 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET HEAD ASM 10- 2010 - 000 -00 118860 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIRS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 94707 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET HANDLE 10- 2010 - 000 -00 118827 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET PLATE 10- 2010 - 000 -00 118538 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CAPSULE /LAMP 10- 2010 - 000 -00 117412 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CONVERTER 10- 2010 - 000 -00 118472 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CONVERTER 10- 2010 - 000 -00 118181 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CLIP 10- 2010 - 000 -00 117645 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CONVERTER 10- 2010 - 000 -00 118310 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CONVERTER 10 -2010- 000 -00 90374 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET RETAINER 10- 2010 - 000 -00 117708 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET HDL ASM 10- 2010 - 000 -00 118888 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET GASKET 10- 2010 - 000 -00 118486 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP HEATER 10- 2010 - 000 -00 542177 4968 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP PLBG PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 540467 4856 002T05 12/27/89 21.00 TAYSTEE BAKING CO. COST OF GS 28- 2010 - 000 -00 4922 002T05 12/27/89 21.00 TAYSTEE BAKING CO. COST OF GS 28- 2010 - 000 -00 5025 1 * ** -CKS SZa► 01 -02 -90 PAGE 12 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 34135 .4969 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 59933 4863 10- 2010 - 000 -00 58641 4205 * ** -CKS 10-2010- 000 -00 638900 4668 10- 2010 - 000 -00 775900 4777 10- 2010- 000 -00 737400 4762 25- 2010 - 000 -00 4116 25- 2010 - 000 -00 919200 4967 25- 2010 - 000 -00 4993 10- 4202 - 240 -24 ' 10 %ad 1990 CITY OF EDINA 60- 2010 - 000 -00 CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR 40- 2010 - 000 -00 ITEM DESCRIPTION 4764 42.00 * 3909 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 260252 002T40 12/27/89 12.60 TOLL COMPANY TORCH OXYGEN 25- 2010 - 000 -00 12.60 * 40- 2010 - 000 -00 * * * * ** 40- 2010 - 000 -00 4796 002T96 12/27/89 119.80 TWIN CITY GAR. DOOR REPAIR DOOR 002T96 12/27/89 2,840.00 TWIN CITY GAR. DOOR REPAIR GAR DOOR 2,959.80 * * * * * ** 002U14 12/27/89 342.23 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP ELECTRIC PARTS 002U14 12/27/89 281.69 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP WIRE 002U14 12/27/89 189.16 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP ELECTRIC PARTS 002U14 12/27/89 171.36 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP FIXTURE 002U14 12/27/89 20.42 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP ELEC PARTS 002U14 12/27/89 •133.53 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP ELEC PARTS * * * * ** 1,138.39 * 002U20 12/27/89 115.00 UNIVERSITY OF MN REGISTRATION 115.00 * * * * * ** 002U27 12/27/89 167,000.00 US WEST COMM. RELOCATION CABLES 167,000.00 * * * * * ** 002V46 12/27/89 356.80 VESSCO FLUORIDE PUMP 002V46 12/27/89 356.80 VESSCO FLUORIDE PUMP 713.60 * * * * * ** 002V80 12/27/89 394.80 VOSS ELECTRIC SUP LAMPS 394.80 * * * * * ** 002W08 12/27/89 190.36 W.W. GRAINGER HEATER 002W08 12/27/89 94.10 W.W. GRAINGER MOTOR 002W08 12/27/89 67.80 W.W. GRAINGER CIRCULATOR PARTS 352.26 * * * * ** 002W66 12/27/89 162.77 WILLIAMS STEEL RUST OLEUM 002W66 12/27/89 81.03 WILLIAMS STEEL HARD HAT SPRAY SZa► 01 -02 -90 PAGE 12 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 34135 .4969 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 59933 4863 10- 2010 - 000 -00 58641 4205 * ** -CKS 10-2010- 000 -00 638900 4668 10- 2010 - 000 -00 775900 4777 10- 2010- 000 -00 737400 4762 25- 2010 - 000 -00 4116 25- 2010 - 000 -00 919200 4967 25- 2010 - 000 -00 4993 10- 4202 - 240 -24 * ** -CKS 60- 2010 - 000 -00 A85425 * ** -CKS 40- 2010 - 000 -00 7144 4764 40- 2010 - 000 -00 7145 3909 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 260252 4685 * ** -CKS 25- 2010 - 000 -00 4675 40- 2010 - 000 -00 4675 40- 2010 - 000 -00 4796 10- 2010 - 000 -00 219520 10- 2010 - 000 -00 218264 * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 002W66 12/27/89 002W66 12/27/89 002W66 12/27/89 002W66 12/27/89 * * * * ** 002W71 12/27/89 * * * * ** 002Z05 12/27/89 * * * * ** AMOUNT 47.47 229.75 88.76 41.86 651.64 * 568.25 568.25 * 313.20 313.20 * 150,878.67 9.32 2,585.57 711.08 111.86 1,753.99 20.91 1,744.65 7,929.88 4,397.42 172,785.85 342,929.20 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION WILLIAMS STEEL CYLINDER WILLIAMS STEEL HARD HAT SPRAY WILLIAMS STEEL SUPPLIES WILLIAMS STEEL HARD HAT SPRAY WINFIELD DEVEL. ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE FUND 10 TOTAL FUND 12 TOTAL FUND 23 TOTAL FUND 25 TOTAL FUND 27 TOTAL FUND 28 TOTAL FUND 29 TOTAL FUND 30 TOTAL FUND 40 TOTAL FUND 50 TOTAL FUND 60 TOTAL TOTAL RENT 1ST AID KIT SUP GENERAL FUND COMMUNICATIONS ART CENTER CAPITAL FUND GOLF COURSE FUND RECREATION CENTER FUND GUN RANGE FUND EDINBOROUGH PARK UTILITY FUND LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND CONSTRUCTION FUND 1 01 -02 -90 PAGE 13 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 2010 - 000 -00 217078 10- 2010 - 000 -00 216014 10- 2010 - 000 -00 216049 40- 2010 - 000 -00 217323 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 627 -62 101679 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 180716 5158 * ** -CKS • � w9N34 1r� Cn Q3 �0 • •'�bAPOM��O• lee9 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & Council Members Agenda Item # Ix-A. From: Kenneth Rosland Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: January 2, 1990 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: ❑ To Council WEST SUBURBAN MEDIATION CENTER Action }{ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: That the letter received from West Suburban Mediation Center concerning Hennepin County's decision not to fund them in 1990 be referred to the Human Relations Commission. Info /Background: Attached is information which the Human Relations Commission used in the budget process. Edina will be funding West Suburban Mediation Center $800 in 1990. Their total budget is $45,000 of which $15,000 came from the County. Their letter has asked all of us for some creative thoughts. My recommendation is to refer this back to the Human Relations Commission for their added reviewal and further recommendation. WEST SUBURBAN 32 Tenth Avenue South, December 20, 1989 Mayor and City Council City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Attention: City Manager MEDIATION Suite 211, Hopkins, Dear Mayor and Council Members: AGENGA ITEM: IX.A. CENTER MN 55343 (612) 933 -0005 On December 14th, the final decision was made by Hennepin County not to fund the West Suburban Mediation Center, the North Hennepin Mediation Project and the Minneapolis Mediation Program due to funding constraints on the part of the County Board. The County funds represented one -third of our 1990 budget; support from nine municipalities represented another third and the remainder was to be raised by grants, corporate contributions and community organizations. just as our Center increased its mediations and conciliations 115% over 1988, the sudden, unexpected funding loss has been a shock. We plan to continue providing our services to residents of your community. Additional efforts will be made to make up for the unexpected shortfall. Any suggestions you might have would be appreciated. Thank you for your support and interest. Sincerely, 7U� Susan A. Nelson Executive Director SAN /vm cc: Susan Wohlrabe WEST SUBURBAN MEDIATION CENTER ;32 Tenth Avenue South, Suite 211, Hopkins, MN 55343 (612) 933 -0005 June 1. 1959 Edina. Human Relations Comes ission City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina. MN. 55424 Attention: Susan Wohlrabe Administrative Assistant. Dear Members: Vest Suburban Mediation Center (WSMO is submitting a proposal to you for funding in 1990, . Caseload activity involving Edina residents so far this year have included: 1. landlord /tenant pr:jblem which was conciliated due to our intervention. 2. Three employer /employee disputes when all three "other parties' refused to mediate. A "Malicious Mischief "' problem involving 14 .juveniles was mediated with an agreement. 4. Business /Consumer• case was conciliated. The "other party" agreed to "write oft ' the bill. As noted in the proposal in a study of 2.5' 1 cases handled by WSMC, 7% involved Edina residents. New directions includr. , 1. Certification by the Minnesota Supreme Court ( first program in the State) which permits court referrals. 2. Training nine (9) new mediators (4 applicants were from Edina = 2 are taking training now). 3. Truancy projectwith District 283. 4. Shoplifting mediati.tins with Target (Knollwood) and Carson Pirie Scott (Ynollwood). 5. State funding assistAnce bill passed the Senate 67 -0: was not heard in the House. The concept of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is growing in Minnesota. Our numbers of cases. although stall low. increased 64 %« the first quarter al' OS9. Also. "Bench & Bar ". the official publication of the Minnesota `Mate Bar Association devoted the April. 1989 issue to ADR. WSMC Page 2 We have asked the cities in our service area to inform residents of our availability in city newsletters, to appoint a representative (liaison) to.our Board and to make referrals. We plan to meet soon with Representative Mary Forsythe to seek advice on promotion of our services to Edina. residents (see letter in attachments) . We need the support of the cities in our service area in order to continue to be available as an option to resolve disputes. Sincerely, ZSue Nelson Executive Director SNlvm enclosures S JBURBAN N EDIA' 'ON CENTER 32 Tent Avenue'south, Suite 211, Hopkins, MN 55343 FUNDING PROPOSAL FOR THE CITY OF EDINA (612) 933 -0005 June 2. 1959 The West. Suburban Mediation Center iWSNICI is requesting 52500 for 1990. STATEMENT OF N7EED The concept of alternative dispute resolution in the form (if community -based media- tion programs has grown and developed because of the need to provide citizens with a quick. accessible. convenient, and inexpensive forum to resolve their disputes Comm- unity mediation programs are based on the premise that citizens are capable of identifying their problems and resolving differences which divide them. Many serious disputes begin as misunderstandings or failures to communicate. Cases may range from multi -party disputes involving whole neighborhoods to conflicts confined to a single household. They may be local disputes between neighbors, landlords and tenants businesses and consumers. or acquaintances. The problem may be noise. parking. im- proper property upkeep. vandalism, quality of goods and services, payment of money owed. or juvenile delinquency. They may include financial losses, threats and harass- ment, insults and innuendo. Juvenile offenses which are generally most amenable to resolution through mediation. include theft damage of property, trespassing, simple assault and truancy. The community based mediation program serving Edina, addresses the urgent need of community citizens for efficient. fair alternatives for dispute resolution apart faun the court system. WSMC seeks to spare coin inunItti residents the stress a.nd ext)ense oi' inappropriate processes, inadequate remedies: and inaccessible ►ntitutitins. The iuvenile diversion program helps to meet the needs of the communities by teach- ing young people alternative resolutic►ns to unacceptable behavior. WSMC Page 2 Mediation services are needed to relieve the court system. to sage public and private money and to reinforce and promote emontinally healthy families and neighborhoods In 19 WS13C served 525 individuals In a study ot'fl-51 cases. 7"0 were involving one or more residents or businesses in Edina SEPVICES Four types of service are offered: --Mediation. When parties in dispute or conf lict v oluntarily agree to participate. they attend a mediation session along with two neutral mediators scheduled at a time and place convenient to the disputants. The function cif the mediators is to facilitate comm- unication between the parties. assist them in establishing mutual needs, and finally to assist the parties to arrive at an agreement that resoi es the dispute -- Conciliation. When the parties are nut.willing to participate in face _to face media- tion or if the conflict is amenable to resolution through telephone or written commun- ication, an effort is made to develop a total or partial solution to the problem. -- Information and Referral. If mediation or conciliation does not seem, an appropriate forum for the disputants problem. the parties may be advised of other resources available to them to deal peaceably with the conflict. Referral arrangements are mainutined with a wide rasiety of social a vencies -- Public Education Presentations are made free of charge to any community seinrice group requesting such a presentation Pi-e5es;tati0ns are also made to schools. city u WS?MC Page 3 staff and social service agencies. Initial and in- service training sessions are offered free to any community resident wishing to serve their community as a mediator or case developer First offender juveniles through mediations become responsible for their behavior and can agree to restitution (financial or in -kindi or a behavior changewhich can pre- vent reoccurrence of delinquency. Compliance to agreements is extremely high Our services are free. voluntary. convenient. speedy and confidential ALTERNATIVE PROGRAMS It is our understanding that Edina "s Human Relations Commission offers a voluntary mediation service to help resolve cases of perceived discrimination With that excep- tion. there is no other free, non - profit, community based program offering mediation services for Edina. RESOURCES There is one paid executive director i 11. l hoijrs a week l and one case developer C12 -1!2 hours Per week) There are 25 trained ol�.irteer .mediators. An additional.nine t 9) are being trained beginning May 15th Four anniicants Deere F.dina .residents. The office is at 32 l(Ith Avenue. South. Suite 211 Hopkins. %,IN. 55343 !Mediations are held in neutral locations in the communities we serve (all west, south and two north- west suburbs) Office hours are nine to six p.m 'Messages may be left on the answer- ing machine when no one is in the of Tice WSMC EXPERIENCE Page 4 The cases referred to us have had a 90% success rate of compliance with mediated agreements. The biggest obstacle in getting cases is the notion that disputes are best handled through an adversarial process. Positive experiences by clients, encouragement by referral sources and continued public relations efforts will chip away at that perspective. We have received referrals and inquiries from: Edina police department 925 -2233 Lt. Jay Brask Captain Kleven Investigator Mike Lutz Police Chief Swanson Dave Velde Edina City Hall 927 -8861 St. Louis Park police department Sgt. Walker Sgt. Shook 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard St. Louis Park, 55416 920 -2345 St..Louis.Park City Manager and Assistant City Manager 924 -2500 Minnetonka police department and city attorney 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka, 55345 933 -1604 Hopkins police department 1010 First St. S. Hopkins, 55343 Commander Liddy Officer Weckman Police Chief Johnson Kirk DiLorenzo School Liaison Officer St. Louis Park High School 6425 W. 33rd Street St. Louis Park, 55426 925 -4300 Plymouth police department Officer Mike Ridgely 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, 55447 544 -9511 / iS SMC Page 5 Other referrals have come from the Golden Valley police department, Legal Aid Legal Rights Center. Dispute Resolution Center. private attorneys. Tonka Referral, individuals, Orono police chief. St. Bonifacius /Minnetrista, WCCOHelp Line, 41ost of the Board members have been with the Center since its inception and most of them are also mediators. Volunteer mediators complete an extensive 25 hours of train- ing according to State Supreme Court guidelines, observe mediations and work with an experienced mediator. A minimum of S hour_ of continuing education must be completed each year. The executive director has a B.A. in sociology; psychology . post graduate training at the University of Minnesom School of Social Work and over 20 years experience as an executive director.in human service agencies. The case developer has had aver 22 years experience with a major department stare as an executive secretary and in customer relations. Follow -up can be a phone call and /or letter to the .referral source stating what the parties have agreed. They may have refused conciliated or decided to try mediation. Reports of the Center's activity to each municipality is usually asked for quarterly to the Mayors and City Councils. An annual report was sent for 19SS. Depending on what the agreement is, we follow up with both parties by phone and /or letter. We call periodically if there are payments to be made. We close a case after agreement has been reached and parties were satisfied. The "initiating party" and "other part-1,," (victirl /offender) are sent an evaluation form and stamped self- addressed envelope WSMC EXPENSES Page 5 As the case load from Edina increases. we expect to approach other organizations in Edina for support if needed (i.e., Golden Valley Rotary Club gave us 5300 on 51'31/88 and the Hopkins Jaycees gave us $5000). Our primary sources of income are Hennepin. County; municipalities. Interest on Lawyers Trust Accounts (IOLTA) and foundations. In 1989 funding so far has come from Hopkins (52500); Nfinnetonka (52500 - contract with city attorney at $250 per mediation); Golden Gulley ($1000); Plymouth ($500); St, Louis Park ($3000); Bloomington ($2360); Eden Prairie ($1500); Richfield ($2500); Edina ($500). Hennepin County again funded us for $15.000 and we plan the same for 1990. We are approaching foundations, corporations and civic organizations to meet budget for 1989. It is our goal to have all the municipalities over 15,000 to fund us for at least $2500 in. 1990 so that our efforts can be directed mainly in outreach and promotion of our services. We do not charge fees but contributions are encouraged. As yet we do not have demographic data:but plan to implement such data.as income level for 1989 cases. A similar program serving Ramsey County has figures that 51% of their cases have in- comes of less than $15,000 and 12% have less than a high school education. WSMC BACKGROUND Page 7 WSMC was established in 19SZ by the Hennepin County Bar Association and initially supported by a grant from the Supreme Court Judicial Planning Committee. Our Center was originally a satellite office staffed part time by Mediation Center for Dispute Resolution in St" Paul. As of July 1, 1987. WSMC became an independent non- profit agency. The consortium of community based programs of which we are a member has become the Minnesota Association of Community- Based Mediation Pro- grams and includes the Mediation Services for Anoka County; Minneapolis Mediation Program: North Hennepin Mediation Project.: Dispute Resolution Center for Ramsey County; and Northlands Mediation Project in Duluth. All programs share the same philosophy and operate similarly but are independent agencies. Goals include refin- ing data collection and evaluation procedures; explore new applications of mediation and conciliation; joint training programs and joint fund - raising efforts; and public relations. O We intend to continue to deliver and market our effective and essential services with your assistance. We would also like a representative from Edina to serve on our Board of Directors w; liaison and to improVe communications. ATTACHMENTS 1958 Annual Report 19SS Board List. 1989 Budget. Representative Forsythe Lea r Attorney General Letter 1988 Financial Recap LW-A - -West- Suburban - Mediation -Centern.-I 989-Budget 4 A B C D E IF i-2 Community i3 Expenses Mediation Personnel Lirector 14050 1'6 (lase Developer 12450 I 17 Taxes/Benefits 3750 .8 Total 30250 Other .1 0 Rent 4350 Telephone 1600 1 2 Staff Dev. 150 1 3 Travel 400 1 4 Postage 1000 1 5 Printing 800 1 6 Capital Equip. 500 1 7 Training 750 11 8 Promotion 1000 1 9 Igisurance 1 100 2 a Supplies 800 Accountina 600 .2 2 Technical Asst. 500 2 3 Miscellaneous 700 .2 4 Total 14250 25 .2 6 TOTAL 44500 2 7 INCOME .2 8 Assured 2 9 F.ennepin Ctv 15000 .30 IOLTA 1200 31 Municipalities 8800 .3 2 Foundations 1100 33 34 3 5 Total 26100 36 37 3 8 Anticipated 3 9 klunicipalitiesi 4000 4 0 Froposal WS MC 7000 4 1 (' orporations 1500 4 2 C ivic Or 5900 3 44 4 5 Total TOTAL 184001 445001 E 46 4 7 4 Mary M. Forsythe District 42B Hennepin County Committees: Appropriations Ways and Means Judiciary. Commerce Higher Education March 10, 1989 Minnesota ' House of Representatives Ms. Sue Nelson, Executive Director West Suburan Mediation Center 32 Tenth Avenue S., Suite 211 Hopkins, MN 55343 Dear Ms. Nelson: Thank you so much for your informative letter concerning the West Suburban Mediation Center and the legislation which is to be introduced. I am well aware of the mediation programs and am very supportive of the work you do. I will look forward to Rep. Orenstein's bill and would anticipate that I would be in support of such legislation. Best wishes and thank you for all of your efforts. Sincerely, Mary Forsyt e State Repre entati MF /ko Reply to: ❑ State Office Building, St. Paui Minnesota 55155 n Off ice: (612) 296-4363 Home: (612) 927 -6613 WEST SUBURBAN MEDIATION CENTER 32 Tenth Avenue South, Suite 211, Hopkins, MN 55343 (612) 933 -0005 December 27,1989 Contact; Sue Nelson Executive Director PRESS RELEASE For Immediate Release Due to budget constraints in Hennepin, County funding for the Hennepin County Mediation Programs was cut for 1990. County funds represented one - third of the budget for West Suburban Mediation Center (WSMC). WSMC serves 31 suburbs in the south, west and northwest suburbs representing over 500,000 people. In 1959, mediations and conciliations increased 115 %. Nearly 1200 people were served. Mediation offers people a process whereby their dispute or problem can be resolved with the assistance of trained volunteer mediators quickly in their own communities and with no fee. The advantages of mediation -- accessibility, free services, convenience, confidentiality and expediency -- outweigh many traditional .E means of dispute resolution, Mediation is flexible and creative and enables parties to see new solutions to old problems, which, left unresolved, may continue to escalate and create additional demands on the courts, police departments, correctional institutions and other social service agencies, Disputes referred to the Center range from neighbor -to- neighbor conflicts over property maintenance and noise to conflicts between consumers and businesses regarding the quality of goods and services or the payment of money owed. Cases may involve two (2) parties or large groups such as residents of multi -unit housing. The juvenile offender program involves cases of vandalism, intra- family conflicts, simple assault, theft, shoplifting, automobile or property damage and truancy. In all situations, the parties and the community benefit from the resolution, rather than the avoidance of the problem. Services are effective, agreements are reached in %% of the cases and compliance to the agreements is equally high as the parties work on their own solutions. No third party makes a decision 1= them. WSMC enables people in conflict to resolve their disputes, juveniles to be held accountable and prevents reoccurrence of illegal behavior, thereby, building healthy, peaceful neighborhoods and stronger communities. Most referrals come from police, city staff, conciliation court and the State Human Rights Department but individuals also may call the Center directly, .Contributions are needed for the Center, a non - profit, charitable agency. Tax- deductible contributions can be sent to WSMC, 32 10th Avenue, South, Hopkins, Minnesota 55343. Call 933 -0005 for further information. -30- ** TOTAL PAGE.03 ** VOLUNTEERS WHO HAVE GIVEN GENEROUSLY OF THEIR TIME INCLUDE: Naomi Anderson Gilbert F. Bakeberg Robert Carlson Frank Commers Denis Diekhoff Bob Ehrenberg Linda Ell Cheri Fischer Tom Fiutak Don Fraley Steve Kessler Shelley Kordell Suzanne Lang Connie Lano Jay Levenson Florence Lowe Timothy Moran James Nelson Ellie Ogden Sandra Ohlgren 1988 BOARD MEMBERS John O'Loughlin John Ott Richard Pouliot Les Puett Jim Ryan Charles Sanders Mary Rose Watson. Cheri Fischer, Chair Robert Carlson Gilbert F. Bakeberg Timothy Moran Karlyce J. Pestello Frank G. Commers Dr. James McDonough Don Fraley Tolly Kizilos Chip Whitacre Mary Rose Watson Charles M. Walerius Tollie Flippin STAFF: Sue Nelson, Executive Director - Ginny Mezera, Case Developer CITIES IN SERVICE AREA ARE: Bloomington Hopkins Minnetonka Beach St. Bonifacius Deephaven Independence Minnetrista St. Louis Park Eden Prairie Long Lake Mound Shorewood Edina Loretto New Hope Spring Park Excelsior Maple Plain Orono Toaka Bay Golden Valley Medicine Lake Plymouth Wayzata Greenfield Medina Richfield Woodland Greenwood Minnetonka Rockford REFERRALS HAVE BEEN MADE BY: Sailor Newspaper Golden Valley Newsletter Dispute Resolution Center -St. Paul North Hennepin Mediation Project Lawyers Referral Service Conciliation Court Minneapolis Housing Board Minnetonka City Offices Building Inspector's Office -Eden Prairie W.C.C.O Consumer Help Line Richfield City Offices Minneapolis /St. Paul Magazine Hopkins Mainstreet Attorney General's Office Bloomington Human Rights Star Tribune Newspaper Police Departments School Personnel City Staff The above list reflects those agencies, organizations and departments which have most frequently referred cases. COMMENTS FROM USERS OF THE SERVICE .,.,` "We were amazed that our dispute was settled in approximately 45 minutes after going back and forth with the parties involved for 8 months. Everyone involved was prompt, courteous and extremely helpful." "For my, husband and me it was a chance to meet and understand the reason behind all the problems that were arising in our neighborhood. Hearing the other side was very helpful too. Our neighborhood is more relaxed and friendly as a result." "This program seemed like an answer to my prayers. Because I can't seem to communicate with my daughter and son -in -law I needed a Mediator outside of the family." "I'm so thankful for the wonderful prompt service and in a week the whole thing was resolved plus a letter of apology from the party I was mediating with. I sure will publicize your service. Thank you." "We were very satisfied with our mediation experience. Mediators were helpful, friendly, professional and understanding. We had to compromise on the resolution, but that was okay. We're very pleased that this service is available." 1988 EVALUATIONS Of 69 evaluations returned, 61 rated the quality of service as excellent or good; 58 got the service they wanted; 57 said their needs were met; and 53 were satisfied with the amount of help they received. FINANCIAL SUPPORT HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY: Hennepin County Bureau of Community Corrections* Lawyers Trust Account Board* Bush Foundation* City of St. Louis Park* City of Golden Valley's City of Plymouth" City of Minnetonka* City of Hopkins* City of Eden Prairie City of Richfield* City of Edina* City of Bloomington City of Orono Golden Valley Rotary Club Hopkins Jaycees* Hopkins Raspberry Festival Prudential Partners in Community Service G.E. Capital Fleet Services * indicates multiple year funding FINANCIAL REPORT Income for 1988 was $40,927 and expenses were $40,939. 60 55 50 W to 45 W V 40 Z W 35 C7 t 30 t- u=i 26 W 20 d 15 10 O INDIVIDUALS MEDIATIONS CONCILIATIONS CASES .SERVED 1988 STATISTICS ABOUT WSMC West Suburban Mediation Center (WSMC) helps people in our service area to resolve disputes through mediation. Our trained volunteer mediators meet with the people involved to facilitate reaching an agreement acceptable to all parties. Mediation keeps control over and responsibility for resolving disputes with the people involved in the dispute. Mediation results in solutions that are more likely to work. WSMC mediates neighbor problems, juvenile offenses, tenant /landlord issues, business /consumer difficulties, residents /city official /staff disputes for groups or individuals. In addition to mediation, WSMC provides conciliation services, information and referral. education and training. Our services are free. voluntary, confidential, quick and convenient. For information or presentations, please call 933-0005. WSMC wishes to thank the volunteers, funders and referral sources who have made its continued service possible! WEST SUBURBAN MEDIATION CENTER 32 10th Avenue South Suite 211 Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 933 -0005