Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-04-16_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING APRIL 16, 1990 7:00 P.M. (Convene Joint HRA /Council Meeting) ROLLCALL I. APPROVAL OF HRA MINUTES OF APRIL 2, 1990 (HRA) II. AWARD OF BID - CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK BUILDING MECHANICAL WORK (HRA) III. EDINA SCHOOLS - REBATE OF EXCESS TAX ° REMENT (Council) IV. ADJOURNMENT OF HRA EDINA CITY COUNCIL COMMENDATION - Representative Mary Forsythe PROCLAMATION - Disability Awareness Week PROCLAMATION - Earth Day I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. * II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of March 19, 1990 III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcalf vote of all members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Final Rezonine PRD -4 Planned Residence District to PSR -4 Senior Citizen District and Final Plat Approval - Walker Methodist and RPI Services, Inc. Generally located in the northwest quadrant of intersection of York Av and Parklawn Av (Contd from 3/19/90) B. Final Development Plan - 7101 -13 Amundson Avenue - George Kosmides - Generally located at southeast corner of Cahill Rd and Amundson Av (Contd from 4/2/90) C. Second Reading - Ordinance No. 825 -A34 - Reveal of Heritage Preservation Overlay District - Ron Clark Construction - Generally located south of West 70th St and west of Cahill Rd D. Final Rezoning - R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -2 Planned Residence District - Ron Clark Construction - Generally located south of West 70th St and west of Cahill Rd E. Final Plat Approval - Highcroft - Ron Clark Construction - Generally located south of West 70th St and west of Cahill Rd F. Preliminary Rezoning Approval - PCD -4 Planned Commercial District to PCD -2 Planned Commercial District - Walgreen's by Semper Holdings, Inc. - Located at 4916 France Avenue So G. Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Plat Approval - R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District to PRD -2 Planned Residence District - Shadow Hill - Schaefer Development - Generally located north of Crosstown Hwy 62 & east Hwy 169 H. Final Development Plan - Opus Corporation - Western National Mutual Insurance- 5350 West 78th St - 5309 Industrial Blvd - Building Expansion I. Final Development Plan - Gabbert and Beck - 6969 France Avenue So - Building Expansion for The Galleria Edina City Council April 16, 1990 Page 2 IV. ORDINANCES First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Readii Favorable rollcall vote of majority of all members of Council required to pas:.. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. A. Second Reading - Ordinance No. 902 -A2 - To Delete Automatic Termination Provision for Wine Licenses V. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS A. Walnut Ridge Park - Barbara Arnold, 6515 Biscayne Blvd B. Storm Sewer Projects - Mrs. Donald Gooding, 5824 Halifax Av VI. AWARD OF BIDS A. Storm Sewer Improvement Nos. STS -199, STS -200, STS -201, STS -202, STS -203 * B. Sprinkler System for Braemar Golf Dome * C. Golf Cars * D. Blacktop Surface Around Core Building - Van Valkenburg Park * E. Retaining Mall - Braemar Golf Course Lesson Area * F. Storm Sever and Electrical Trenching - Braemar Soccer/Football Field * G. Mill Pond Weed Harvesting H. Public Officials Liability Insurance I. Police Professional Liability Insurance * J. Greens Mover * R. Removal of Diseased Trees and Stumps and Trimming of Boulevard Trees VII. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Feasibility Report - West 69th Street and 42nd Street Sidewalk - Set Hearing Date .(5/7/90) B. Tax Increment Districts Update C. Dog License Renewal Process D. Appointments - Board of Appeals and Recycling Commission VIII. COMMUNICATIONS A. Letter - E. David Reyes, 616 W. 53rd Street, Minneapolis, MN IX. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES A. I -494 Update X. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL XI. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS A. Emergency Plan Exercise XII. FINANCE * A. Payment of Claims as per Check Register dated 04/16/90: Total $541,647.27 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Tues Apr 17 Volunteers Recognition Reception 5:00 p.m. Braemar Clubhouse Mon Apr 23 Board of Review 5:00 p.m. Council Room Mon May 7 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Tues May 15 School District Election Mon May 21 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room MINUTES EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APRIL 2, 1990 Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Chairman Richards. MINUTES of the Joint HRA /Council Meeting of March 19,1990 were approved as submitted by-motion of Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Rice. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda lmotion of Commissioner Paulus was seconded by Commissioner Smith for adj9urnment. Motion carried unanimously. Executive Director Ow e - Cn O v tees COMMENDATION WHEREAS, Mary M. Forsythe was elected to the Minnesota House of Representatives as a Representative from the City of Edina in 1972; and WHEREAS, during those eighteen years in public office, Mary M. Forsythe has served on the following committees: Appropriations, Human Services Division, Commerce, Tourism, Judiciary, Ways and Means, Legislative Commission on Planning and Fiscal Policy; and WHEREAS, Mary M. Forsythe was the first woman to serve as Chair of the full Appropriations Committee; and WHEREAS, the mandatory seat belt law, authored by Mary M. Forsythe, has seen far - reaching effects and will continue to save lives; and WHEREAS, during her years of public service, Mary M. Forsythe has contributed greatly to the well -being of the State of Minnesota and to the Legislative District that she served; and WHEREAS, Mary M. Forsythe has deservedly held the respect and regard of the residents of the City of Edina. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby express its appreciation to MARY M. FORSYTHE for her unselfish and dedicated services as a member of the Minnesota State Legislature; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be entered into the Minutes of the Edina City Council and that an appropriate copy be presented to her. Mayor R o, ^ 0 •'�V�RP'ORAt�V 1BBB REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: CITY COUNCIL From: MAYOR RICHARDS Dater APRIL 13, 1990 Subject: APPOINTMENT TO RECYCLING COMMISSION Recommendation: Info /Background: Agenda Item # VII.D Consent Cj Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Action ; X I Motion i Resolution 1 !! Ordinance Discussion Attached is background information "on Inna K. Hayes, 5857 Creek Valley Road, whom I would like to appoint to the Recycling Commission with the consent of the Council. "4 Inna K. Hays Inna Hays, a 23 -year resident of Edina, is a graduate of Chatham College, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. She is an independent management and information consultant,` having begun her professional career in public relations for non - profit and scientific organizations in New York City in 1958. For many years, she was a paraprofessional -lay reader for elementary and secondary level English teachers in the Edina school district. The three Hays sons attended Edina schools from kindergarten through graduation. Her volunteer activities have included Guthrie Theater Stagehands as co- editor of its monthly newsletter; editor of the University of Minnesota Faculty Women's Club activities guide for children; publicity chairman of Edina Newcomers; public relations coordinator for the Westminster Town Hall Forum, among others. She is management associate for Silha Associates, a nationwide consulting firm in the media industry and is research coordinator for CITY INNOVATION based in Minneapolis. This national program is committed, through innovative initiatives, to assisting America's cities in solving urban problems and improving the quality of life for its citizens. One of her many interests is viable recycling of consumer commodities, whether they be cans, glass and newspapers or magazines and books for the school district. 5857 Creek Valley Road Edina, Minnesota 55439 [612] 941 -3795 r X V I t•' N\�1� o, REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: HRA FROM: GORDON L. HUGHES VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: APRIL 16, 1990 AGENDA ITEM HRA /COUNCIL II. ITEM DESCRIPTION: CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK BUILDING MECHANICAL WORK Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. 1. 2. See attached 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Recommend that bids be rejected and project rebid. GENERAL INFORMATION: The attached bids are for the mechanical system for the Centennial Lakes Park Building. The low bid substantially exceeded our estimate. We recommend redesign and rebid. l 144a, Signature Department The Recommended bid is within budget not withip bu �t JraFrfMallin, Finaice Director Kenneth Rosland, City CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK CENTRUM #83 -8832 MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS - BID TALLY NO. CONTRACTORS ADDENDUM BID AMOUNTS NO. 1 BOND 7 t0ow 14414-sl V KA ALL. � 24�. • 4� S w►��D 'VVI� �. `� 2�. no VJ*j2s ?oil .4S7D 7 • 0 oe��� 00 1' ** REPORT /RECOMMENDATION \�RlO1N'�O .aee To: HRA AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # HRA COUNCIL III. From: GORDON L. HUGHES Consent ❑ EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Info_ rmation Only ❑ Date: APRIL 16, 1990 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: REBATE OF EXCESS ❑ To Council TAX INCREMENT Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Discussion Recommendation: Consider rebate to Edina School District of Excess Tax Increments from 50th & France and Grandview tax increment financing districts resulting from the 1988 School District Referendum. Info /Background: Attached is a letter dated March 30, 1990, from James Hamann, Assistant Superintendent of Business Services for the Edina Public Schools. This letter renews the request of the Board of Education that the City rebate tax increments which resulted from the 1988 School Tax Referendum. This request was considered but not acted upon by the City Council at its July 24, 1989 meeting. Attached for your review is a copy of the July 24, 1989, staff report. According to our information, the 1990 payable increments resulting from the 1988 referendum, total $57,535. According to Dr. Hamman's letter of March 30, 1990, the return of this amount of excess increments would not result in additional revenues for the school district. Rather, it would result in a reduction in the school's mill rate. In that the school's levy has already been certified for 1990 payable taxes, a rebate, if approved, should be for the payable 1991 taxes. ., -} %� . Report /Recommendation April 16, 1990 Page Two When this issue was considered in July of 1989, staff understood that the rebate of the excess increments would result in additional revenues to the school district. Apparently this is not the case, based on Dr. Hamman's March 30, 1990, letter. Therefore I am concerned as to whether there is any real benefit that is derived by the district from this rebate. If the Council wishes to proceed with this rebate, I suggest that it be instituted for payable 1991 taxes and that the amount of the rebate should be conditioned on the collection of at least 95% of the taxes from each tax increment financing district, i.e., no more than a 5% delinquency rate of total tax revenue. I would also recommend that the rebate be applied only for 1991 and that it be considered annually thereafter. 1 DISABILITY AWARENESS WEEK APRIL 22 -28, 1990 WHEREAS: Many individuals with disabilities are living independently in our community and are participating in educational, social, religious and recreational activities; and WHEREAS: A significant effort is being made Statewide to eliminate barriers for persons who are disabled in the areas of employment, housing, transportation, education, and public accommodations; and WHEREAS: City officials and school administrators desire public awareness as to the issues and concerns facing persons who are disabled; and WHEREAS. Residents of our community need to become more aware of the talents and abilities of persons who are disabled; and WHEREAS: The Governor of the State of Minnesota, and each of the South Hennepin communities, are proclaiming Disability Awareness Week in recognition of the contributions individuals who are disabled make within the State and the communities in which they live; NOW, THEREFORE, 1, Fnedeh,i.ch S. Mahon oj the, City ab Edina (Name) (Title) (Entity) 0 do hereby proclaim the week of April 22 -28, 1990 as DISABILITY AWARENESS WEEK in Edina Further, 1 urge all residents ' of our City to be more open and attentive to the needs and abilities of persons with disabilities. Dated this 16th day of Apn it , 1990. (Signature) Maym (Title) A E �y see REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & Council Members Agenda Item # Proclamation From: Ken Rosland Consent ❑ Earth Day Information Only ❑ Date: April 13, 1990 Mgr_ .. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: PROCLAMATION 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: That the City Council adopt the attached resolution regarding Earth Day 1990, which is supported by the Edina Recycling Commission, the Edina League of Women Voters and the Inter -Faith Peacemakers of Edina. /SSA, 1 s o IPBP % RESOLUTION WHEREAS, almost twenty years ago, more -than twenty million Americans joined together on Earth Day in a demonstration of-- concern for the environment, and their collective action resulted in the passage of sweeping new laws to protect our air, water and land; and WHEREAS, in the nineteen years since the first Earth Day, despite environmental improvements, the environmental health of the planet is increasingly endangered, threatened -by Global Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, Growing World Population, Tropical Deforestation, Ocean Pollution, Toxic Wastes, Desertification, and Nuclear Waste requiring action by all sectors of society; and WHEREAS, Earth Day 1990 is a national and international call to action for all citizens to join in a global effort to save the planet; and WHEREAS, Earth Day 1990 activities and events will educate all citizens on the importance of acting in an environmentally sensitive fashion by recycling, conserving energy and water, using efficient transportation, and adopting more ecologically sound lifestyles; and WHEREAS, Earth Day 1990 will educate all citizens on the importance of buying and using those products least harmful to the environment; and WHEREAS, Earth Day 1990 will educate all citizens on the importance of doing business with companies that are environmentally sensitive and responsible; and WHEREAS, Earth Day 1990 will educate all citizens on the importance of voting for those candidates who demonstrate an abiding concern for the environment; and WHEREAS, Earth Day 1990 will educate all citizens on the importance of supporting the passage of legislation that will help protect the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina designate and proclaim April 22, 1990, as Earth Day 1990, and that that day shall be set aside for public activities promoting preservation of the global environment and launching the "Decade of the Environment ". Mayor Earth Dal 99O GREEN PLEDGE 01 Because our planet today faces severe environmental crises such as global warming, rain forest devastation, growing ►rid population, and water and air pollution ... Because the planet's future depends on the commitment of every nation, as well as every individual ... I pledge to do my share in saving the planet by letting my concern for the environment shape how I ... /act I pledge to do my utmost to recycle, conserve energy, save water, use efficient transportation, and try to adopt a lifestyle as if every day were Earth Day. Purchase 1 pledge to buy and use those products least harmful to the environment. Moreover, I will do business with corporations that promote global environmental responsibility. Vote I pledge to vote and support those candidates who demonstrate an abiding concern for the environment. Support I pledge to support the passage of local, state and federal laws and international treaties that protect the environment. )'(nir signature APRIL 22, 1990 EARTH DAY Date EARTH DAY 1990 • P.O. BOX 10329 • MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55458 -3329 • 612 -627 -4049 Let Earth Day know that you have joined thousands of others in taking the Green Pledge! ❑ I took the pledge! N.,n,e 'dress St.ite. Lip Home Phone Work Phone I'm a Student. -' Elementary El High School ❑ I %vans to volunteer my time for Earth D:n. College Printed im rec%rled paper. EARTH DAY 1 999 GREEN PLEDGE BECAUSE our planet today faces severe environmental crises such as global warming. rain forest devastation. growing world population, and water and air pollution.... BECAUSE the planet's future depends on the commitment of every nation, as well as every individual.... I PLEDGE TO 0011Y SHARE in saving the planet by -letting my concern for the environment shape how I .... ACT I pledge to do my utmost to recycle. conserve energy. save water. use efficient transportation. and try to adopt a lifestyle as if every day were Earth Day. PURCHASE I pledge to buy and use products least harmful to the environment. Moreover. 1 will do business with corporations that promote global environmental responsibility. VOTE 1 pledge to vote and support those candidates who demonstrate an abiding concern for the environment. SUPPORT I pledge to support the passage of local. state and federal laws and international treaties that protect the environment. EARTH DAY 1990 -APRIL 22. 1990 LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF EDINA LOCAL POSITIONS ENVIRONMENT Support for government consideration of environmental impact on city decision making. (1971) LAND USE Support for exercise of municipal powers to acquire and protect village. open lands and water resources. ( 1971 ) Support for enactment of zoning ordinances which regulate development to facilitate efficient use of transportation systems and utilities. Support for a transit system in Edina. (1973) Support for a system of bike paths and walkways in Edina. (1973) Support for the concept of a fenced nature preserve for the Bredesen Park area. (1973) Support for improved communication betweeen planning commission and community concerning pending development do i s i ons and land use changes. (1973 ) RECYCLING Support for the household pickup of recyclables in Edina. Support of adequate city staff for local recycling programs. Support for an ordinance to allow curbside placement of recyclables for pickkup. Support of a city -wide anti - scavenging ordinance to protect these recyclables from being picked up by anyone other than the designated receiver. Support for adequate funding for a household pickup system. (1984) ATTENTION NEIGHBORS & STUDENTS of Lealwo Women of Voters Ifof Edina Earth Day 1990 will be a global demonstration of citizen concern for protection of the Earth. Earth Day 1990 GREEN PLEDGE Bet;.aUSe our planet today faces severe environmerial ses such as global warming. rain foes: devastation, glowing population, and water and air polhroon ... BeOUSe the planet's future depends on the commitment of every nation, as well as every individual ... 1 pledge to do my shame in saving the planet by letting my concern for the environment shape how I ... Act I pledge as do toy a>moar to recycle, masleve ervem% saw comer, use ef6timt rtansporemm, and cry to adopt a l lea* as if every day were Earth Dxy. Purchm I pledge an boy, and use chose peedocts Ina harmful to the mvieoemenr. Moraae; 1 will do braises with - - I , omt char p- wei global mrhoommnl nespoosthtilit}. VOOe I pledge w voce and support chose aedidaon who densonstrate an abiding cancers for the earnonshme Support I pledge m rapport the passage of laoL soot: and federal leave and iares�ooeal rseatI that proms dos meiroamaht APRIL 22, 1990 EARTH DAY yow sipenrre the EARfi10Ar 1990 • PC gmi 10329 • MWAL#P= MN SMS -3329. 612. 6274049 Shopping for a Better Environment me Ow'b' donvlmamsal ehspping: • `dune tlr amount disse dbarded • Resets oomamas and produce. IOeeIde as much s posdbb. • Reject aassiva passaging, —recy ck" peckam and posh- • Roan by wrubq m can* a and pubk oAieimb m azws poor msarns. L Red labele — Bemnse familiar with the contents dyour household pod - um m determine bab d tomiry. learn proper disposd paoeas and to Identify more durable or repairable items L Make a Ust —A shopping list discourages impulse buying often based on ataactive but excessive packaging. 3. Buy Recyclable— Be aware of your local recycling program ad the types of materials accepted. L Buy Recycled — reeyc4d items an be identified blr. • A gray Interior its paperboard boxes eonoinetg cereals. desepnts. oke mines. eta • Asataomtaspmbolthetsays 'nedefrom recycled rneters is.' • The reeyduhgspmbalon tla pardge (Netts Somedrnes the artows art used to identify tarydolie— it In doubt. eoesaa the awnpany i S. BeyinbulkmielaeaR ►padepdprodhctslelupgrestlus- WWidually wrappd pmdats ro9demote f � Ple aueo d sanrfng and attainment. globtr ade(turnfreshingradimtsmwasaft draple, more rtmifesand tee lass paw Buy dos ler¢a 9uant" 7M CM witbanhassinga g. Buydumbleand re- 1 01ehems —Them items usually offers battle overall enWOOIDmddraice and cost saving!. 7. Buy reusable ar eetorshk— These types of products and packaging povlde better overall vale man the sorneen es more eonvemmo dispos- able alternative. a Buy from mcood4mndles aWageuats— Them bususessesaupport the I Request t of reusing raw than plastic —The for mrse d an old bag, or no 9. Requaat paple bap bag at all a 1 1 yes. axing beg mods from moon or nylon provides a durable and adramw alrse . Paper is made (sure a raaeasbke noexurm oases bssha•e�osd pollution and is recyclable. Shopping for a Better Environment, continued MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MARCH 19, 1990 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Paulus, Rice, Smith, and Mayor Richards. CAMP FIRE BIRTHDAY WEER PROCLAIMED Mayor Richards presented the following proclamation which was adopted unanimously by motion of Member Paulus, seconded by Member Smith: PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, Camp Fire, the national youth organization celebrated its 80th birthday on March 17, 1990, and WHEREAS, Camp Fire councils teach boys and girls self - reliance and good citizenship; and WHEREAS, through contemporary programs and by speaking out on issues that affect youth and their families, today's Camp Fire is helping kids cope with their changing world; and WHEREAS, in Camp Fire, the choices and opportunities are wide open for boys and girls; and WHEREAS, through Camp Fire, young people are learning to develop confidence and to gain skills needed to become tomorrow's leaders; and WHEREAS, Camp Fire is commended for the opportunities its programs offer to young people in the City of Edina and throughout the nation and for the many services these young people perform for their communities through Camp Fire; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Frederick S. Richards, Mayor of the City of Edina, do hereby proclaim March 19 to March 23, 1990, to be CAMP FIRE BIRTHDAY WEER in the City of Edina. ADOPTED this 19th day of March, 1990. Accepting the proclamation was Debora S. Berendts, Service Team Manager for Camp Fire clubs in Edina, Richfield and Bloomington, who briefly explained how Camp Fire benefits the youth of Edina. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Smith to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented with the exception of the removal of item IV.B - Ordinance No. 451 -A7 - Amending Ordinance No. 451 to Correct Error Therein Relating to Size of Sign. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 5 AND JOINT HRA /COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 5. 1990 APPROVED Motion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Smith to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of February 5, 1990 and -the Joint HRA /Council meeting of March 5, 1990. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 7101 -13 AMUNDSON AVENUE CONTINUED TO 412190 Planner Craig Larsen recalled that at the March 5, 1990 Council Meeting the public hearing on the final development plan for 7101 -13 Amundson Avenue was continued to this meeting at the proponent's request. Staff has suggested that the proponent may want to continue the matter again to April 2, 1990 when the Council will consider the proposed tax increment district for the 70th Street and Cahill Road area. George Kosmides, proponent, stated that he did not object to the continuation. Motion was made by Member Smith to continue the public hearing on the final development plan for 7101 -13 Amundson Avenue to April 2, 1990. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. AMENDMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADOPTED: HERITAGE PRESERVATION OVERIAY DISTRICT REPEALED; PRELIMINARY REZONING TO PRD -2 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT GRANTED, AND PRELIMM4ARY PIAT APPROVED FOR RON CLARK DEVELOPMENT [CLARKS 2ND ADDITION) Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen presented the request of Ron Clark Construction for Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, Repeal of the Heritage Preservation Overlay District, Preliminary Rezoning to PRD -2 Planned Residential District and Preliminary Plat Approval for Highcroft. He noted that the subject property is generally located south of West 70th Street and west of Cahill Road and in total is approximately 12 acres in size. Planner Larsen said there are four actions required by the Council if the development is to go forward° 1) Amendment to Comprehensive Plan from Quasi - Public and Medium Density Residential to Single Family and Low Density Residential. 2) Repeal of the Heritage Preservation Overlay District. 3) Preliminary Rezoning from R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -2 Planned Residential District. 4) Preliminary Plat Approval for Highcroft. (Single Family and Townhouse Lots). Comprehensive Plan Amendments - The Comprehensive Plan designates most of the site as Quasi- Public (churches, private schools, golf courses, cemeteries). The easterly 300 feet of the site (approximately 2 acres) is designated Medium Density Residential. This designation includes townhouses and low -rise apartment buildings in a density range of 6 -12 dwelling units per acre. Except for Lewis Park, the entire west Cahill Road frontage from 70th to 78th Streets is designated Medium Density Residential. Planner Larsen explained that the proposed development would designate the existing school site without the parking from the existing Quasi - Public to Single Family Residential, would designate the central portion containing the parking from the existing Quasi - Public to Low Density Residential and would designate the easterly portion from its existing Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential. There are two major components of the proposed development. The single family development on the westerly 8.6 acres for 13 lots and townhouses for the easterly 4.2 acres to support 21 townhouses lots. The initial proposal contained 13 single family lots and 25 townhouse lots. Conformance with Subdivision Ordinance - Single Family Lots - The neighborhood, as defined in the Subdivision Ordinance, would include all developed single family lots within 500 feet of the perimeter of the property proposed for single family lots. The median dimensions and sizes for the defined neighborhood are: lot width of 110 feet, lot depth of 150 feet and lot area of 16,800 square feet. The initial proposal was for 13 single family lots; seven of the lots required variances either from the Subdivision Ordinance or the Zoning Ordinance or both. The revised proposal now under consideration still illustrates 13 lots but variances are now required for only two lots. A lot depth variance is required for Lot 13 (150 feet required, 120 provided). Lot 7 would require a lot width variance (110 feet required, lacks required width 50 feet back from the front property line) and a lot width perimeter ratio variance (0.1 required, 0.04 provided). The townhouse component would occupy the easterly 4.2 acres of the property. The first two proposals considered by the Planning Commission called for 25 units; the result was a Medium Density Residential designation. According to the Comprehensive Plan that would require a PRD -3 Planned Residential zoning of the property. The development proposed buildings containing between 3 and 7 dwelling units each. The modified proposal now under consideration has been reduced from 25 to 21 units, with no more than four units in any building. The resulting density has been reduced from 5.9 per acre to 5 dwelling units per acre. Also, the zoning has been reduced from PRD -3 to PRD -2 which meets the definition for Low Density Attached Residential. Other multi - family developments along the Cahill Road frontage vary between between 7 and 12 dwelling units per acre. Townhouses generally vary between 7 and 9 dwelling units per acre. The townhouse component does comply with all Zoning Ordinance requirements for the PRD -2 District. The Heritage Preservation Board met on November 28, 1989 to discuss the historical significance and future of the old St. Patrick's Church at 70th and Cahill. The Board concluded that architecturally and historically the building itself was not significant but that the site was. They recommended that the building be removed and the history of the Cahill settlement and St. Patrick's Church be commemorated at the intersection by some type of monument. At its meeting of February 28, 1990, the Community Development and Planning Commission reviewed the development proposal as now presented. At that time the Planning Commission took one vote on the overall development plan resulting in a 4 -4 tie vote. If the Council were to approve the four actions as stated, staff would recommend that preliminary rezoning and preliminary approval be conditioned upon: 1) Final Rezoning, 2) Final Plat Approval, 3) Subdivison Dedication, 4) Developer's Agreement, 5) Landscaping Plan and Bond, and 6) Investigation of a Historical Park near 70th and Cahill. Presentation for Proponent Michael Gair, Gair & Associates, stated that he was representing Ron Clark, proponent, who was also present together with Nancy Horn, project manager for the development. Mr. Gair made a board presentation of the proposed development summarized as follows. The subject site is 12.8 acres in area with a quarter -mile frontage on West 70th Street. The existing school is an approximate 52,000 square foot, two story building fronting on West 70th Street. The school is served by an existing 180 x 180 foot parking facility east of the building and on the most easterly portion of the site is the old St. Patrick's Church building. The configuration of the property consists of 1,296 feet on West 70th Street, with the school portion measuring 651 x 601 feet. The "panhandle" extending to the east measures 139 x 695 feet. Physical features include steep slopes that are heavily wooded to the rear of the school building. The slope continues northerly along the east side of the school building to 70th Street. There is a 40 -foot drop in elevation going in an east -west direction and also a 40 -foot drop in elevation on the most southern portion of the site. Existing vegetation are white oaks on the eastern extremity. A neighborhood study was done of existing land use and existing densities which range from 1.8 units per acre to 8.3 units per acre. To the west and north of the site are single family homes; east of Limerick Lane and north of West 70th Street are existing twin homes (Low Density); directly east across Cahill Road is the commercial area; directly south of the "panhandle" are townhomes and condominiums (Medium Density); and park exists directly south of the school building. Both West 70th Street and Cahill Road are collector streets. Regarding land use concepts, they looked at existing uses and the lay of the land. The proposed single family land use component on the western 8 acres will relate well to the existing single family homes to the west and north. The slope continuing northerly up to 70th Street will provide for transition between the single family and the townhomes on the eastern 4.2 acre "panhandle ". The reason for the townhomes use is that they are dealing with a strip of land measuring 239 feet north -south that abuts medium to high density to the south. The 13 single family lots will be served by a cul -de -sac and the sites were laid out off of topography maps first and then the lotting arrangement was considered. The single family homes will range in price from $350- 700,000. The townhomes on the remaining 4.2 acres will range in price from $250- 350,000. Three schemes have been considered for the development of the property. The first consisted of 13 single family homes and 25 townhomes. The Planning Commission and area residents had several concerns regarding that scheme. In the single family component there were a number of variances that would be required in terms of lot depth, lot width and perimeter area ratio. There was also concern regarding the transition between townhomes and single family, the three access points along West 70th Street, and the density. In response, the plan was modified with some minor shifts in roadway alignment to reduce the number of lots requiring variances for the single family portion to'Lots 7 and 13. In addition, in the townhome area there was a shifting of building pads to create a greater horizontal /vertical separation between the townhomes and the single family and to provide a dense evergreen buffer. That also made it possible to reduce the height of the retaining walls. Even with those positive changes, there was still concern regarding the general density and orientation of the project. The single family component was modified so that the access to Lot 13 would be from 70th Street instead of from the cul -de -sac. This enabled a common orientation for the rear yards of Lots 13, 12, 11, 10 and 9. Additionally, by reorienting the townhomes and reducing the number of units the townhomes have rear yards that back up to the single family, the access points from 70th Street have been reduced from 3 to 2, some of the white oaks can be saved and none of the townhouse buildings will contain more than 4 dwelling units. Had the 4.2 acres site for the townhomes been developed under the Medium Density designation, the yield could have been in the 25 to 30 unit range - in contrast this is 21 units with a density of 5 units per acre. With the shifting of the townhome building locations a more open feeling has been created. A floor plan of the 3 -story Highpointe Condominiums building, located to the south, was shown to illustrate its relationship to the proposed townhouses. It pointed out that 9 units are oriented solely to the south, 6 units have a north -south orientation and only one unit orients exclusively to the north. The distances between the two would range from 155 to 180 feet. The single family homes on the north side of 70th Street would view into the side or at oblique angles to the proposed townhomes. The westerly townhomes are proposed as two story structures with a height 29 feet to the ridge and a setback of 90 feet. Landscaping and berming is proposed along all the edges of the development. The pair of twin homes are single level walkouts with a height of 26 feet. A traffic impact analysis for the proposed development has been prepared by Robert Morris, traffic engineer. The analysis showed a considerable reduction in the average daily traffic that would be generated by the proposed housing development as compared to the traffic generated by the existing Montessori School. Following the presentation by Mr. Gair, Mayor Richards commented that the Council has received copies of the numerous letters concerning the development from many of the neighborhood residents, some of whom are in the audience. Phone calls that have been made to individual Council Members have not been shared because the Council feels strongly that any discussion take place at the public hearing. He added that the Council is familiar with the site and is fully informed of the issues. Mayor Richards then called for public comment. Public Comment Speaking in objection to the proposed development were Steve Smithson, 5608 West 70th Street; Ted Steen, 5524 W. 70th Street, who presented 91 letters of objection from the neighborhood; Candice Rishavy, 5817 McGuire Road; Miles Hirschey, Highpointe Condominiums; Saul Collins, 5501 Village Drive; and Lowell Swanson, 5501 Village Drive. The major concern expressed by those objecting was the density of the townhouse component, also the issue of adequate guest parking. Evelyn Daniels, 5705 McGuire Road, and Ralph Linvill, 7005 Antrim Road, asked that the historical significance for this part of Edina be preserved. Speaking in support of the proposed development were: Diane Ebert, 7004 Lee Valley Circle; Joe Lyon, 7005 Lee Valley Circle; Darlene McDonald, 5501 Village Drive; Lyle Sauers, 5547 Village Drive; Neil McCouth, 7015 Lee Valley Circle; and George Kosmides, 7009 Lee Valley Circle. Ron Clark, proponent, spoke to several specific issues that had been raised. Guest parking /townhouses - Each unit has a double garage in front of which are two parking spaces. In addition there are 11 guest parking spaces on the site. St. Patrick's Church - The church was one of the objections in marketing the Highpointe Condomiums as prospective buyers considered it an eyesore. Future condominium building /Highpointe caretaker - The disclosure statement declared that one or more future buildings may be added but that declarant was not obligated to do that. Landscaping at Highlander Townhomes - All landscaping was put in, with two trees added last summer in response to a resident's request. Density Issue /Single Family Homes - The possibility of single family homes all the way to Limerick Lane Lane was considered in several preliminary site plans. Because of the "panhandle" configuration single family homes (20,000 square foot lots) are not feasible. Also considered was 6 small single family units, with either zero lot lines or very narrow lots. It was felt that those would not look good and could not be successfully marketed. Mr. Clark concluded that the proposed density of 5 units per acre is the lowest townhouse density in the City. Council Comments Mayor Richards observed that the issues and concerns that have been raised are controversial and that it may be helpful for the Council Members to state their viewpoints on the issues concerning the proposed development. Mayor Richards - 1) There is no under lying R -1 zoning classification; all land that is undeveloped is R -1 zoning for holding purposes. The Comprehensive Plan serves as a guide as to how property should be developed when a development proposal comes forth. The Plan classified the school property as quasi - public with the easterly portion as Medium Density. The proposal before the Council is for a change from Medium Density to Low Density. 2) The market forces and what should be developed on that site should be consistent with the Plan. The private sector is best suited to determine the market demand. 3) The facts as presented indicate that if developed as proposed there would be less traffic generated than presently exists. 4) The issue of future school need is decided by another elected body. 5) Issues concerning what was or was not done at developments to the south are not part of this process. 6) There is ample public sector property for park and open space purposes in that part of Edina. However, there should be some recognition of Edina's heritage and the early settlers in the Cahill area. 8) Density is an important issue that has been properly addressed in the proposal before the Council. The 1.5 units per acre for the single family portion relates well to the 2.1 units per acre in the Lanham Lane area, the 1.8 units per acre in the Lee Valley Circle area and the 2.0 units per acre north of 70th Street. The Comprehensive Plan currently classifies the easterly portion as suitable for Medium Density, PRD -3 zoning which is a density greater than what is being proposed of 5.0 units per acre or Low Density, PRD -2 zoning. 9) The issue of setbacks from the Highpoint Condominiums on the south, for the pair of double units from 70th Street and the height of the townhouses as viewed from the homes north of West 70th Street are proper planning. Mayor Richards said that for those reasons he intended to support the proposal. Member Rice - 1) Questioned adequacy of the physical development of the site to control runoff. Engineer Hoffman said there are some final details to be worked out but in general the plans are adequate. 2) Question as to access for emergency vehicles. Engineer Hoffman said ambulances can access the site; for fires, hoses would be laid from the fire vehicles on the street as is the case with all townhouses. 3) Requested history of Heritage Preservation Overlay District. Planner Larsen explained that in 1982 the overlay district zoning was approved in connection with a proposal to rezone the property to allow for a 22 -unit, two story condominium building. The reason for the overlay district was that the old church was to be incorporated for private use as an amenity for that project. 4) Questioned site lines for traffic exiting from Highpointe condominiums. Engineer Hoffman -said the proposed development would not change the existing site lines. 5) Asked if access and siting for Lot 13 had been resolved. Planner Larsen said the revised plan has added to the square footage for Lot 13 so that it now has a northeast orientation for the house with access from 70th Street. 6) Questioned the townhouse driveway grade as to safety. Planner Larsen said the curb cut was moved to the west to handle the grade differential. Member Rice commented that he took exception to comments that this area has not been well planned. The proposal is another example of how the City has handled the transition from certain types of use to other uses. The Comprehensive Plan wisely classified the 70th /Cahill corner for higher density than single family. The traffic generated by the proposal would be less than almost any other use. Relative to the historic nature of the site, that should be commemorated as the original Irish settlement in the community but there is no need to preserve the church building. Member Rice concluded that he is generally in favor of the development as proposed. Member Smith - 1) There will be substantially less traffic from the development proposed. 2) Density is a buffer issue to the residents to the north and a frustration issue to the residents to the south. Elements contributing to the transition from single family to low density are the major collector street classification and the topograph of the site. The 90 foot setback provided for the pair of twin units does provide a buffer to the north. The view of the townhouses should be an improvement over the present parking lot. The low density as now proposed for the east portion of the site is an improvement over all. For the residents to the south the 180 foot distance between the buildings seems to be adequate. Member Smith said that the issues and concerns raised at the Planning Commissions hearings have been addressed and the proposal is good. Member Paulus - 1) The townhouse development does not appear to be dense but parking could become an issue, especially for emergency vehicles. 2) The historical value of the area was lost by development in prior years. Importance should be given to that area but a pocket park is not the answer. The City does not have the dollars to create more park space. 3) Issue of devaluating homes in the area - the increase in traffic on 70th Street has been the major factor. What will bring new values to the area is housing stock of the single family homes. 4) Necklot Lot 7 raises great concern that a precedent will be set for future subdivisions. 5) Single family homes on the "panhandle" portion with zero lot lines would not be favorable. 6) This project has nothing to do with the revenue it will generate, it has to do with planning the use of the land for the future. The school is obsolete and it would be too expensive to rehab the building. Also, the cost to the City to purchase the building would be prohibitive. The development being proposed is the best alternative. Mayor Richards summarized the issues still to be addressed prior to final rezoning and plat approval: 1) townhouse parking for guests, 2) grading plan to control runoff and erosion, 3) ability for emergency vehicles to service the townhouses, 4) definitive conceptual plan to commemorate the St. Patrick Church /Irish settlers historical site, 5) review of single family Lot 7, and 6) site lines at Village Drive. Member Smith then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FROM QUASI - PUBLIC AND MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO SINGLE FAMILY AND LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL , BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Edina, Minnesota, that it hereby approves and adopts the following Amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan 1980/90 for property located at the southwest corner of Cahill Road and West 70th Street: 1. The designation for the westerly 8.6 acres is changed from Quasi - Public to Single Family Residential on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Nap. 2. The designation for the easterly 4.2 acres is changed from Quasi - Public and Medium Density Residential to Low Density Attached Residential on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Nap. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Rice. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted.- Member Rice introduced Ordinance No. 825 -A34 for First Reading as follows, subject to the following conditions: 1) Final Rezoning, 2) Final Plat Approval, 3) Subdivision Dedication, 4) Developer's Agreement, 5) Landscaping Plan and Bond, 6) Investigation of Historical Park near 70th and Cahill, and 7) Review of site lines at Village Drive: ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A34 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825) TO REMOVE PROPERTY FROM THE HERITAGE PRESERVATION OVERLAY DISTRICT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 6 of Ordinance No. 825 of the City is hereby amended by removing the following described property from the Heritage Preservation Overlay District (HPD): "That part of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 8, Township 116, Range 21 described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of the Northwest one quarter of Northeast one quarter thence South 15.5 rods, thence West 15.5 rods, thence North 15.5 rods, thence East 15.5 rods to beginning; and Commencing in the North line of Northwest one quarter of Northeast one quarter at a point 914.4 feet East from the Northwest corner thereof, then South 271.8 feet to North line of South 32 acres of Northwest one quarter of Northeast one quarter, then East to Northeast corner of said 32 acres, then North 16.55 feet, then West 15.5 rods, then North 239.2 feet, then West 161.6 feet to beginning except roads." Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Motion for First Reading of the ordinance was seconded by Member Paulus Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards First Reading granted. Member Paulus introduced Ordinance No. 825 -A35 for First Reading as follows, subject to the conditions as previously stated: ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A35 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 815) BY ADDING TO THE PLANNED RESIDENCE DISTRICT (PRD -2) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 6 of Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding the following thereto: "The extent -of the Planned Residence District (Sub - District PRD -2) is .enlarged by the addition of the following property: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 116, Range 21, lying north of the north line of the south 32 acres thereof, which lies easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 8; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 49 minutes 20.seconds East, along the north line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, 477.30 feet to the point of beginning; thence South 32 degrees 10 minutes 40 seconds East 99.84 feet; thence South 06 degrees 09 minutes 10 seconds East 162.11 feet; thence South 56 degrees 39 minutes 03 seconds East 43.97 feet to the intersection of the north line of said South 32 acres and said line there terminating." Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Motion for First Reading of the ordinance was seconded by Member Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards First Reading granted. Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption, subject to the conditions as previously stated: RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FOR CLARKS 2ND ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "CLARKS 2ND ADDITION ", platted by Ron Clark Construction, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, and American National Bank and Trust Company, a national banking association, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of March 19, 1990 be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Rice. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED: YEAR %VI CDBG PROGRAM BUDGET APPROVED Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Pursuant to due notice having been given, a public hearing was conducted on the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program for Year XVI. Planner Larsen stated that for Year XVI Hennepin County has been allotted 2.6 percent less than received in 1989 from the federal government. The City's allocation reflects a similar decrease. The proposed budget includes: Household and Outside Maintenance for the Elderly (H.O.M.E.) $ 24,450 Child Day Care Subsidy 20,000 Rehabilitation of Private Property 39,425 Removal of Architectural Barriers 50.241 $134,116 Planner Larsen explained the removal of architectural barriers funding will be used to continue making handicapped access improvements to public buildings. Projects slated for this year include accessibility to the Community Center at entrance 5/6 located in the middle of the east elevation as well as handicapped improvements to a pair of first floor restrooms. With funds carried over from Year XV, a pair of restrooms at Braemar Arena will be upgraded. He mentioned that the Human Relations Commission reviewed the proposed Year XVI budget on March 5 and would be involved on a continuing basis through year with the intent that the Commission would have a significant impact on possible changes for next year's budget. Mayor Richards asked if there were any projects proposed that are not included in the budget. Planner Larsen said that there have been no other requests for funding and staff has not been able to identify other eligible projects that would be better.. Member Smith asked for more information on the child day care program. Planner Larsen said the program is funded directly through Hennepin County with staff receiving reports periodically on how the funds are spent. The Human Relations Commission will review the program this year as to continued funding. No further comment or objections were heard. Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING PROPOSED PROGRAM FOR YEAR %VI URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS AND AUTHORIZING ITS SUBMITTAL WHEREAS, the City of Edina, through execution of a Joint Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County, is a cooperating unit in the Urban County Community Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina has developed a proposal for the use of Urban Hennepin County GDBG funds made available to it, following a public hearing on March 19, 1990 to obtain the views of citizens on local and Urban Hennepin County housing and community development needs and the City's following proposed use of Year %VI Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant funds: H.O.M.E Program $ 24,450 (Household and Outside Maintenance for the Elderly) Child Day Care Subsidy 20,000 Rehabilitation of Private Property 39,425 Removal of Architectural Barriers 50.241 $134,116 BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Edina approves the proposed use of Year %VI Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant fiords and authorizes submittal of the proposal to Hennepin County for consideration by the Citizen Advisory Committee and for inclusion in the Year %VI Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Statement of Objectives and Project Use of Funds. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. *FINAL REZONING PRD -4 TO PSR -4 AND FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR WALKER METHODIST/RPI SERVICES. INC. CONTINUED TO 4/16/90 Notion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Smith to continue the public hearing on final rezoning from PRD -4 Planned Residence District to PSR -4 Senior Citizen District and final plat approval for Walker Methodist and RPI Services, Inc. to April 16, 1990. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. *HEARING DATE OF 4/2/90 SET FOR RELEASE OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS /SOUTH HARRIET PARK STEINER ADDITION Notion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Smith setting April 2, 1990 as the hearing date for the request to release restrictive covenants on the South Harriet Park Steiner Addition. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. ORDINANCE NO. 1031 -A3 (NOXIOUS WEEDS) ADOPTED: SECOND READING WAIVED Manager Rosland stated that, as directed by the Council, an amendment has been drafted to the ordinance regulating noxious weeds. The amendment incorporates the provisions of Minnesota Statute 18.171 and would strengthen the City's ordinance regarding cutting and removal of noxious weeds and other rank vegetation. Member Rice introduced Ordinance No. 1031 -A3 and moved its adoption with waiver of Second Reading as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 1031 -A3 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1031 TO DEFINE NOXIOUS WEEDS, PROVIDE FOR CUTTING AND REMOVAL OF NOXIOUS WEEDS AND OTHER VEGETATION, PROVIDE FOR CHARGING THE COST OF SUCH CUTTING AND REMOVAL, AND CHANGING THE PENALTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section 1. Sec. 5 of Ordinance No. 1031 is hereby renumbered to Sec. 6, and a new Sec. 5 is hereby added as follows: "Sec. 5. Noxious Weeds and Other Vegetation: Removal: Assessing Costs. (a) Noxious weeds, as used in this ordinance, shall be those plants which are determined, from time to time, to be noxious weeds pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, 1990, Section 18.171, Subd. 5. (b) The weed inspector or assistant weed inspector of the City may enter upon property to cut, remove, destroy and eradicate rank growths of vegetation, including grass or weeds, which are a nuisance under Sec. 2(e) of this ordinance, and also noxious weeds. (c) Such entry by the weed inspector or assistant weed inspector shall be done only after written notice is served upon the owner and the occupant, if othei than the owner, of the property to be entered, and failure of the.owner or occupant to cut down,'remove, destroy or eradicate the noxious weeds, or rank growths of vegetation, within the time, and in such manner, as the weed inspector or assistant weed inspector shall designate in such notice. Such notice shall be given in the manner prescribed by Minnesota Statutes, Section 18.271, Subd. 2, and shall allow a minimum of seven (7) days for the property owner or occupant to comply with requirements of said notice. (d) The costs and expenses incurred by the City in connection with entering a property pursuant to (c) of this Section, and cutting, removing, destroying and eradicating noxious weeds and rank growths of vegetation, shall be paid by the owner or occupant of the property entered pursuant to a notice containing the information and served as prescribed by Minnesota Statutes, Section 18.271, Subd. 4. If the City is not paid the amount stated in the notice within thirty (30) days or before the following October 1, whichever is later, such amount shall become a lien in favor of the City and a penalty of eight percent (8 %) shall be certified to the auditor of Hennepin County for entry as a tax upon such property, all pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 18.271, Subd. 4." Sec. 2. The penalty provisions of Sec. 6 of Ordinance No. 1031 are hereby amended to read as follows: "Sec. 6. Penalty. Any person who violates any provision of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to the penalties set forth in Ordinance No. 175 in addition to the costs and taxes charged by this ordinance." Sec. 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith,'Richards Ordinance adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 451 -A7 (SIGN ORDINANCE) ADOPTED: SECOND READING WAIVED Member Rice asked if any sign permit was approved under the ordinance adopted in October, 1989 which incorrectly stated the allowed square feet allowed per sign in the 14DD -6 District. Planner Larsen said that none was approved and that the ordinance provisions affect only the development identification sign, e.g. the medical building in Centennial Lakes. Member Rice introduced Ordinance No. 451 -A7 and moved its adoption with waiver of Second Reading as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 451 -A7 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 451 TO CORRECT ERROR THEREIN RELATING TO SIZE OF SIGN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 5, paragraph (h)(1)(d) of Ordinance No. 451 is hereby amended to read as follows: (d) MDD -6 District: One sign per development not to exceed 100 square feet in area a. For developments with more than one street frontage, one additional sign per street frontage provided each additional sign does not exceed 70 square feet in area. Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Ordinance adopted. CONCERN OF RESIDENT CONCERNING ACTIVITIES AT WALNUT RIDGE PARR NOTED Mayor Richards advised that he had received a call from Barbara Arnold, 6515 Biscayne Boulevard, who was concerned about the activities that have been occurring at Walnut Ridge Park, e.g. drinking parties and subsequent debris. After brief discussion it was agreed to place this on a future agenda when Mrs. Arnold could be present so that the Council could discuss a general policy on that type of problem and give a sense of direction to staff. *AWARD OF BID FOR SAND, ROCK, BITUMINOUS MATERIAL, CONCRETE CONTINUED TO 4/2/90 Notion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Smith to continue the award of bid for sand, rock, bituminous material and concrete to April 2, 1990. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR WATER TREATMENT CHEMICALS Notion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for water treatment chemicals to sole bidder, Hawkins Chemical, Inc., at $48.25 per 100 lbs. of hydrofluosilicic acid and 100 lbs. of liquid chlorine. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR JOHN DEERE MOWER Notion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for a John Deere mower for the Park Department to recommended low bidder, Scharber & Sons, at $6,550.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR GREENSMASTER MOWER Notion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for a Greensmaster mower for Braemar Golf Course to recommended low bidder, NTI Distributing, at $8,067.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR CUSHMAN TURF TRUCKSTER Notion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for a Cushman Turf Truckster to recommended low bidder, Cushman, at $8,355.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. ' *BID AWARDED FOR EMERGENCY REPAIR OF PUMP Notion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for emergency repair of pump at the 72nd Street lift station to sole supplier, Waldor Pump, at $6,848.77. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF 3/13190 APPROVED Member Smith moved approval of the following recommended action listed in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of March 13, 1990: 1) To install "COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY AHEAD - USE CAUTION" signs and two pedestrian signs on Lincoln Drive at the entrance to Honeywell and also to repaint the double yellow striping in the area, 2) To install "NO PARKING ANYTIME" signs on the east side of Drew Avenue 30, from the public intersections and 15' from the private driveways, and to acknowledge Sections B and C of the Minutes. Motion for approval was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. COOPERATIVE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR FRANCE AVENUE (W. 70TH STREET TO MINNESOTA DR) APPROVED Engineer Hoffman stated that this is the last step in the process to approve the construction project on France Avenue from West 70th Street to Minnesota Drive. The project will satisfy one of the Indirect Source Permit requirements for the Centennial Lakes project. It will also provide for intersection changes at West 70th Street, Hazelton Road and West 76th Street that should meet future traffic projections for those intersections on France Av. This project is a federal aid to urban roadways project and federal aid will fund 57% of the eligible construction items on France Avenue, estimated federal funding is $1.13 million. The estimated total project cost is $2.6 million which includes right of way costs. Engineer Hoffman explained that the project will also include a large storm sewer in the 72nd and France area which will connect to the Centennial Lakes project. This part of the project is another portion of the City's stormwater management plan, cost of which is estimated at $225,000 and will be funded by the stormwater utility. The balance of the project will be funded by county state aid, municipal state aid and assessment to benefited property owners. The estimated construction cost on the side streets (West 70th Street, Hazelton Road and West 76th Street) is $227,000 and will be funded from municipal state aid and costs for right of way will be eligible municipal state aid costs. The estimated City construction share on France Avenue will be approximately $253,000 with approximately $100,000 being federal aid and the balance from municipal state aid 'and assessment. Additionally, the City will have potential right of way costs of $305,000 which will be split with the county (50 -50) and will be eligible for reimbursement from municipal state aid. Recommended action required for the project: 1) Approve the Cooperative Construction Agreement and authorize Mayor and Manager to sign Agreement, 3) Adopt resolution for state aid funds, and 4) Reaffirm assessment for Street Improvement No. BA -280. Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Agreement for participation in the construction of County State Aid Highway No. 17 between 210 feet north of West 77th Street and 75 feet north of West 70th Street, Hennepin County Project No. 8110, Agreement No. PW65- 11 -89, has been prepared and presented to the City. WHEREAS, Plans for Hennepin County Project No. 8110 showing proposed alignment, profiles, grades, and cross sections for the reconstruction of County State Aid Highway No. 17, within the limits of the City, as a Federal Aid and a State Aid Project, have been prepared and presented to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED: That said Agreement be in all things approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the Mayor and Manager are authorized to sign Agreement. No. 65- 11 -89, Hennepin County Project No. 8110. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, it has been deemed advisable and necessary for the City of Edina to participate in the cost of aeconstruction project located on C.S.A.H. No. 17 within the limits'of said municipality, and WHEREAS, said construction project has been approved by the Commissioner of Transportation and identified in his records as S.A.P. No. 120 - 020 -026 and S.A.P. No. 120 - 020 -027; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That we do hereby appropriate from our Municipal State -Aid Street Funds the sum of $785,000.00 to apply toward the construction of said project and request the Commissioner of Transportation to approve this authorization. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION REAFFIRMING ORDERING OF IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -280 WHEREAS, the City Council of Edina, Minnesota, conducted a public hearing on March 21, 1988, pursuant to due notice given, to consider the following proposed improvement to be constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429: PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -280 WHEREAS, the Notice of Public Hearing specified that the properties proposed to be assessed for a portion of the cost be assessed at $40.00 per lineal foot of property abutting France Avenue; WHEREAS, the Edina City Council after considering the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts, by resolution on March 21, 1988, determined to proceed with construction of said improvement and specified the area to be specially assessed for a portion of the cost; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby reaffirms the action taken by resolution on March 21, 1988, regarding Improvement No. BA -280. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. RESOLUTION ADOPTED DESIGNATING MUNICIPAL STATE AID ROUTES Engineer Hoffman stated that annually the engineering staff reviews the municipal state aid system in Edina per state requirements. The City is allowed to have 20 percent of its street mileage designated as state aid routes, which routes must connect to other state aid routes or county /state highways. From time to time, staff will recommend changes to the system to encompass the major road system or expected road systems which have high traffic volumes. The last minor changes were made in 1983. Staff would recommend the following changes: Removals (A) Grimes Avenue from West 44th Street to West 42nd Street and West 42nd Street from Grimes Avenue to France Avenue. (B) Valley View Road from County Road 18 East Frontage Road to the Valley View Road /Braemar Boulevard intersection. Additions (A) Parklawn Avenue from France Avenue to York Avenue. (B) Braemar Boulevard from the Valley View Road /Braemar intersection along Braemar past the Golf Dome to the Ikola Way intersection, thence westerly to the west side of the Braemar Arena lot, thence northerly to the Valley View Road /County Road 18 (now 169) ramp intersection. Member Rice introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING MUNICIPAL STATE AID HIGHWAYS WHEREAS, it appears to the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the streets hereinafter described should be designated as Municipal State Aid Streets under the provisions of Minnesota Laws of 1967, Chapter 162; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Edina, County of Hennepin, that the streets described as follows, to -wit: 1. Parklawn Avenue from France Avenue to York Avenue (120- 174 -010) 2. Braemar Boulevard from the Valley View Road /Braemar intersection to the Valley View Road/T.H. 169 intersection (120- 175 -010) be, and hereby are established, located, and designated as Municipal State Aid Streets of said City of Edina, subject to the approval of the Commissioner of Highways of the State of Minnesota; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Edina, County of Hennepin that the streets described as follows, to -wit: 1. Grimes Avenue from West 44th Street to Morningside Road (120- 167 -010) 2. Grimes Avenue from Morningside Road to West 42nd Street (120- 167 -020) 3. West 42nd Street from Grimes Avenue to France Avenue (120- 168 -010) 4. Portion of Valley View Road from T.H. 169 East Frontage Road to the Valley View Road /Braemar Boulevard intersection (120- 151 -010) be, and hereby are removed from Municipal State Aid designation of said City of Edina, subject to the approval of the Commissioner of Highways of the State of Minnesota; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to forward two certified copies of this resolution to the Commissioner of Highways for his consideration, and that upon his approval of the designation of said streets, that same be constructed, improved and maintained as Municipal State Aid Streets of the City of Edina, to be numbered and known as Municipal State Aid Streets. ADOPTED this 19th day of March, 1990. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. REPORT ON DOG LICENSING DISCUSSED Manager Rosland stated that, as requested by the Council, Chief Swanson had prepared a report on dog licensing which included facts as to rationale for licensing, number of licenses issued, number of renewals, estimates of the dog population and estimated cost for renewal mailout notices which has been recommended by staff. Following some discussion as to the need for the initial license and yearly renewal, Manager Rosland suggested that staff develop a draft renewal notice and further information on the process. APPOINTMENT MADE TO COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE: VACANCY ON BOARD OF APPEALS NOTED Mayor Richards advised that he intended to appoint Spencer Turner to the Community Health Services Advisory Committee, whose name had been submitted by Member Smith. Notion was made by Member Smith for consent of the Mayor's appointment of Spencer Turner to the Community Health Services Advisory Committee for a two year term to 2/l/93. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. Mayor Richards reminded the Council of the vacancy on the Board of Appeals and asked that names be submitted for that appointment. BEER LICENSE RENEWALS APPROVED Notion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Smith for approval of beer license renewals for the following establishments: On -Sale - Biltmore Bowl, Braemar Golf Course, Braemar Golf Dome, Bravo[ Italian Specialties, Corelli's Pizza & Pasta, Daytons Food Service, Edina American Legion Post, Empress Restaurant, Jerry's Foods (also off - sale), Original Pancake House, Pantry Restaurant, Southdale Bowl, Szechuan Star Restaurant, T J's Family Restaurant, and The Lotus -III; Off -Sale - Edina Superette, Holiday Stations, Inc., Kennys Markets, Country Store and SuperAmerica Station. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. RESOLUTION ADOPTED APPROVING PRECINCT NO. 20 POLLING LOCATION Notion was made by by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Smith for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Zdina, Minnesota, that the polling place for Precinct 20 in the City of Edina be changed from Wooddale Montessori Academy (old Cahill School), 5601 W. 70th Street to Brookview Church, 5015 W. 70th Street. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. HENNEPIN COUNTY RECYCLING RECOGNITION LUNCHEON SET FOR 4118/90 Manager Rosland mentioned that the Hennepin County Board of Commissions has invited the Council and City staff to their annual Recycling Recognition Luncheon on April 18, 1990. He said that Janet Chandler, Recycling Coordinator, and he would attend and that if any of the Council Members could go to let him know so that reservations could be made. Member Smith suggested that the members of the Recycling Commission be contacted and invited to attend. REQUEST OF CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE REGARDING FLYING CLOUD LANDFILL DEFERRED Mayor Richards referred to a request from the City of Eden Prairie to support them in opposing the expansion of the Flying Cloud Landfill. He asked Manager Rosland to get more background information on the issue and suggested that this be deferred to a later date. SUPPORT LETTER TO BE SENT OBJECTING TO HOST FEES FOR SOLID WASTE FACILITIES Manager Rosland called to the Council's attention -a letter from Commissioner Sivanich advising that the cities of Minneapolis and Elk River are lobbying in favor of a legislative amendment to the Waste Management Act which would instate "host fees" for solid waste facilities located in those cities. The fee which is being lobbied is $1 per cubic yard. While Hennepin County is concerned about ensuring that cities which host such facilities are compensated for any expenses incurred, the county strongly objects to the proposed legislation and has asked the City of Edina'to support their position. Following some discussion, Member Smith made a motion that a letter be drafted for the Mayor's signature in support of Hennepin County's position regarding the proposed legislation that would instate host fees for solid waste facilities.in Minneapolis and Elk River. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. MI.0 SUPPORTS SINGLE TAX RATE ON HOMESTEADS Mayor Richards advised that he and Manager Rosland, on behalf of the City of Edina, had attended a press conference on March 19 in St. Paul, sponsored by the Municipal Legislative Commission (MLC), at which the MLC member cities announced support for legislation that would change Minnesota's property tax system to require a single tax rate on homesteads. Senator Ramstad (Minnetonka) and Rep. Limmer (Maple Grove) have introduced a bill calling for a constitutional amendment establishing a flat tax rate. Another bill sponsored by Rep. Blatz (Bloomington) and Senator Knaak (White Bear Lake) would establish a single tax rate by statute. Dan McElroy, Mayor of Burnsville, was the spokesman for the elected officials from the 15 member cities who were present. . STUDENTS TO RECEIVE CERTIFICATES FOR COUNCIL )UMER PRESENTATION Member Paulus passed to the Council a copy of the certificate that the City staff had drafted to be given to students who listen to presentations on City government. She said that the second graders at Cornelia were excited when they received them and that this was an inexpensive and effective public relations aid. SCHOOL DISTRICT STRATEGIC PLANNING - PHASE-II NOTED Member Paulus presented a copy of the School District Strategic Planning - Phase II document resulting from a two -day retreat last week. She said that the six plans that have been developed through the planning process represent massive hours of community support. Initially it was felt that millions of dollars would be needed to implement the plans but the conclusion was that a lot of the cost will be absorbed over the next few years via the School's budgeting process. Member Paulus said at the end of the retreat she delivered a message about the City's budget crunch because one of the goals was to have the City fund a person who would control the problem of alcoholic abuse in the City, especially at the youth level. The School District does not understand the City's budget review process and asked that they be informed of that timeframe and the procedure. CONDITION OF GLEASON ROAD SIDEWAL.RS REPORTED Member Rice reported that he had received a phone call from a resident who was concerned about the condition of the sidewalks on Gleason Road by the elementary school. Manager Rosland said that there may be some upheaval at this time of year but that he would have staff check on the condition. NOTICES TO TOWNHOUSES /CONDOMINIUM OWNERS QUESTIONED In connection with the Ron Clark development heard earlier, Member Rice said he noted that notices were not given to owners of townhouses and condominiums within 500 feet of the proposed development and that he felt they should be notified. Planner Larsen said that the ordinance requires notice to the single family homeowners who are used for neighborhood comparison purposes. They are notified for the Council public hearing but are not notified for the initial Planning Commission hearing. He said' that it could be done but would involve more staff time. After some discussion on the issue of who should be noticed in addition to the ordinance requirements, it was the consensus of the Council that this be placed on a future agenda for consideration. SUNMRY OF STRATEGIC PLANNING SESSION HELD ON 3/12/90 PRESENTED Manager Rosland referred"to the summary of the Strategic Planning Session held on March 12, 1990. He said the next step would be to put together a work plan based on the five major issues that were identified. Mayor Richards suggested that this matter be placed back on the agenda when all five Council Members would be present so that the Council could discuss this in greater depth and reach a consensus as to the issues to be included in the work plan. RESOLUTION ADOPTED REIATING TO $3,080,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREKENT BONDS. SERIES 1990A: AWARDING THE SALE, FIXING THE FORM AND DETAILS. PROVIDING FOR THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY THEREOF AND THE SECURITY THEREFOR The City Clerk presented affidavits showing publication of the Notice of Bond Sale for the $3,080,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1990A of the City-in a legal newspaper having general circulation in the City, and in a daily or weekly periodical published in a Minnesota city of the first class, which circulates throughout the state and furnishes financial news as a part of its service, as required by law. The affidavits were examined, found to comply with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475 and directed to be filed in the office of the City Clerk. The City Manager reported that 9 sealed bids for the $3,080,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1990A had been received prior to the time designated in the Notice of Bond Sale for the opening of bids. Pursuant to the Notice of Bond Sale and the Terms and Conditions of Sale the bids have been opened, read and tabulated, and the terms of each have been determined to be as follows: Total Interest Interest Bid for Cost -Net Name of Bidder Rates Principal Average Rate BOATMEN'S NATIONAL BANK 6.70- 2002/04 $3,035,882.70 $2,840,646.05 BANK OF ST. LOUIS 6.80 -2005 6.8361% HARRIS TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK BEAR, STEARNS & CO. KIDDER PEABODY & CO. INCORPORATED Bank of Oklahoma, N.A. William Blair & Company A. Webster Dougherty & & Co., Inc. Hutchinson, Shockey, Erley & Co. Mercantile Bank N.A. Stern Brothers & Company Glickenhaus & Company Hamilton Investments, Inc. Mesirow & Company Prescott, Ball & Turben, Incorporated Van Kampen Merritt Inc. BLUNT ELLIS & LOEWI, INC. THE NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY FBS INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC. NORWEST INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC. American National Bank St. Paul Juran & Moody, Inc. Park Investment 6.80- 2002/04 6.85 -2005 6.80 -2002 6.90- 2003/05 6.90- 2002/05 6.80 -2002 6.90 - 2003/05 $3,031,087.35 $2,042,547.95 $3,044,008.00 $3,033,184.00 $2,880,767.02 6.9326% $2,896,290.39 6.9700% $2,903,172.00 6.9860% $2,905,654.33 6.9925% Corporation Marquette Bank Minneapolis, N.A. M.H. Novick & Company, Inc. DAIN BOSWORTH INCORPORATED 6.85 -2002 $3,046,120.00 $2,908,683.54 MERRILL LYNCH CAPITAL 6.90 -2003 6.99988 MARKETS 6.95- 2004/05 PIPER, JAFFRAY & 6.80 -2002 $3,041,500.00 $2,915,360.42 HOPWOOD INC. 6.90 -2003 7.01598 Alison - Williams 6.95 -2004 Company 7.00 -2005 Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated CRONIN & CO. INC. 6.80 -2002 $3,039,960.00 $2,916,900.42 SMITH BARNEY, 6.90 -2003 7.01968 HARRIS UPHAM & 6.95 -2004 CO. INCORPORATED 7.00 -2005 John G. Kinnard & Co. Incorporated MILLER, JOHNSON & 6.90- 2002/03 $3,043,040.00 $2,922,162.08 KUEHN, INC. 6.95 -2004 7.03238 EDWARD D. JONES 7.00 -2005 AND CO. Dougherty, Dawkins, Strand, Yost, Incorporated Craig Hallum, Inc. Moore, Juran and Company, Inc. Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO $3,080,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1990A: AWARDING THE SALE, FIXING THE FORM AND DETAILS, PROVIDING FOR THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY THEREOF AND THE SECURITY THEREFOR BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), as follows: Section 1. Authorization and Sale. 1.01. Authorization. Pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178 and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, the City Council of the City has authorized the issuance and sale of its General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1990A (the Bonds) in the principal amount of $3,080,000 for the purpose of providing funds for the payment of public redevelopment costs to be incurred by the City and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the HRA) in connection with the 50th and France Redevelopment Plan of the HRA (the Plan). 1.02. Sale of Bonds. Notice of the sale of the Bonds was duly published as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60. Pursuant to the Notice of Bond Sale and the Terms and Conditions of Sale, 9 sealed bids for the purchase of the Bonds were received at or before the time specified for receipt of bids. The bids have been opened and publicly read and considered, and the purchase price, interest rates and net interest cost under the terms of each bid have been determined. The most favorable proposal received is that of Boatmen's National Bank of St. Louis, in St. Louis, Missouri (the Purchaser), to purchase the Bonds at a price of $3,035,882.70 plus accrued interest from the date of the Bonds to the date of delivery thereof, the Bonds to bear interest at the rates set forth in Section 3.01. The proposal is hereby accepted, and the Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute a contract on the part of the City for the sale of the Bonds with the Purchaser. The good faith checks of the unsuccessful bidders shall be returned forthwith. 1.03. Performance of Requirements. All acts, conditions and things which are required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the valid issuance of the Bonds having been done, existing, having happened and having been performed, it is now necessary for this Council to establish the form and terms of the Bonds, to provide security therefor and to issue the Bonds forthwith. Section 2. Form of Bonds. 2_01. Bond Form. The -Bonds shall be prepared in substantially the following form: [Face of the Bonds] UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BOND SERIES 1990A No. Date of Rate Maturity Original Issue CUSIP March 1, 1990 REGISTERED OWNER PRINCIPAL AMOUNT SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS DOLLARS THE CITY OF EDINA, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the City), acknowledges itself to be indebted and, for value received, hereby promises to pay to the registered owner named above, or registered assigns, the principal amount specified above, on the maturity date specified above, with interest thereon from the date of original issue specified above, or the most recent interest payment date to which interest has been paid or duly provided for, at the annual rate specified above, payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing February 1, 1991, to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month, all subject to the provisions referred to herein with respect to the redemption of the principal of this Bond before maturity. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof at the office of the Bond Register hereafter designated, the principal hereof, are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft of First Trust National Association, in St. Paul, Minnesota, as'Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the Bond Registrar) or its successor designated under the Resolution described herein. Additional provisions of this Bond are contained on the reverse hereof and such provisions shall for all purposes have the same effect as though fully set forth hereon. This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution until the Certificate of Authentication hereon shall have been executed by the Bond Registrar by manual signature of one of the authorized representatives of the Bond Registrar. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Edina, Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed by the facsimile signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager and by a printed facsimile of the official seal of the City and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the date set forth below. Dated of Authentication: (Facsimile Signature) (Facsimile Signature) City Manager Mayor (Facsimile Seal) CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This is one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned within. First Trust National Association, as Bond Registrar Authorized Representative (Reverse of the Bonds] This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $3,080,000 (the "Bonds "), issued pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on March 19, 1990 (the "Resolution ") to pay public redevelopment costs to be incurred by the City and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA ") in accordance with a Redevelopment Plan of the HRA (the "Plan'). The Bond is issued pursuant to and in full conformity with the provisions of the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota thereunto enabling, including Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178 and Chapter 475. In addition, for the full and prompt payment of the principal and interest on the Bonds as the same become due, the full faith, credit and taxing power of the City have been and are irrevocably pledged. The Bonds are issuable only as fully registered bonds, in denominations of $5,000 or any multiple thereof, of single maturities. The Bonds are each subject to redemption and prepayment, at the option of the City in whole or in part, and if in part, in inverse order of maturities and in $5,000 principal amounts selected by lot, within any maturity, on February 1, 1997 and on any interest payment date thereafter, at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued to the date of redemption. At least thirty days prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond, notice of the call for redemption will be mailed to the Bond Registrar and to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed at his address appearing in the Bond Register, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond, not affected by such defect or failure. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions of Bonds so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price.therein specified, and from and after such date,(unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bonds or portions of Bonds shall cease to bear interest. Upon partial redemption of any Bond, a new Bond or Bonds will be delivered to the registered owner without charge, representing the remaining principal amount outstanding. The Bonds have been designated by the City as "qualified tax- exempt obligations" pursuant to Section 265 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Bond Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by his attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Bond Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or his attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange, the City will cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. The City and the Bond Registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond in order to make it a valid and binding general obligation of the City according to its terms have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed in regular and due form as so required; that prior to the issuance hereof, the City has pledged and appropriated to a sinking fund established for the payment of the Bonds tax increments to be derived by the HRA from a tax increment district created by the HRA to finance public redevelopment costs to be paid or incurred by the HRA or City pursuant to the Plan, which tax increments are to be paid by the HRA to the City in amounts sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds when due; that, if necessary for the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds, ad valorem taxes are required to be levied upon all taxable property in the City, which levy is not limited as to rate or amount; and that the issuance of this Bond does not cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation. The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to the applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM -- as tenants UNIF TRANS MIN ACT..... Custodian..... in common (Cust) (Minor) TEN ENT -- as tenants by the entireties under Uniform Transfers to JT TEN -- as joint tenants Minors with right of survivorship and Act....... .. ... .. ....... not as tenants in (State) common Additional abbreviations may also be used. 2.02. Form of Certificate. A certificate in substantially the following form shall appear on the reverse side of each Bond, following a copy of the teat of the legal opinion of Bond Counsel: We certify that the above is a full, true and correct copy of the legal opinion rendered by Bond Counsel on the issue of Bonds of the City of Edina which Includes the within Bond, dated as of the date of delivery of and payment for the Bonds. (Facsimile signature) (Facsimile signature) City Manager Mayor Section 3. Bond Terms, Execution and Delivery. 3.01. Maturities, Interest Rates, Denominations, Payment. and Dating of Bonds. The City shall forthwith issue and deliver the Bonds, which shall be denominated "General Obligation.Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1990A." The Bonds shall be issuable in the denomination of $5,000 each or any integral multiple thereof, shall mature on February 1 in the years and amounts set forth below, and Bonds maturing in such years and amounts shall bear interest from date of issue until paid or duly called for redemption at the rates per annum shown opposite such years and amounts as follows: Year Amount Rate 2002 $700,000 6.70% 2003 745,000 6.70 2004 800,000 6.70 2005 835,000 6.80 The Bonds shall be issuable only in fully registered form. The interest thereon . and, upon surrender of each Bond, the principal amount thereof, shall be payable by check or draft issued by the Registrar described herein. Each Bond shall be dated as of its date of authentication. 3.02. Interest Payment Dates. Interest on the Bonds shall be payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing February 1, 1991, to the owner of record thereof as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the immediately preceding month, whether or not such day is a business day. 3.03. Registration. The City shall appoint, and shall maintain, a bond registrar, transfer agent and paying agent (the Registrar). The effect of registration and the rights and duties of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto shall be as follows: (a) Register. The Registrar shall keep at its principal corporate trust office a bond register in which the Registrar shall provide for the registration of ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged. (b) Transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender to the Registrar for transfer of any Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner thereof or by an attorney duly authorized by the registered owner in writing, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the transferor. The Registrar may, however, close the books for registration of any transfer after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each interest payment date and until such interest payment date. (c) Exchange of Bonds. Whenever any.Bond is surrendered by the registered owner for exchange, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the registered owner or the owner's attorney duly authorized in writing. (d) Cancellation. All Bonds surrendered upon any transfer or exchange shall be promptly cancelled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. (e) Improper or Unauthorized Transfer. When any Bond is presented to the Registrar for transfer, the Registrar may refuse to transfer the same until it is satisfied that the endorsement on such Bond or separate instrument of transfer is legally authorized. The Registrar shall incur no liability for its refusal, in good faith, to make transfers which it, in its judgment, deems improper or unauthorized. (f) Persons Deemed Owners. The City and the Registrar may treat the person in whose name any Bond is at any time registered in the bond register as the absolute owner of such Bond, whether such Bond shall be overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal of and interest on such Bond and for all other purposes, and all such payments so made to any such registered owner or upon the owner's order shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability of the City upon such Bond to the extent of the sum or SUM s so paid. (g) Taxes. Fees and Charges. For every transfer or exchange of Bonds (except for an exchange upon a partial redemption of a Bond), the Registrar may impose a charge upon the owner thereof sufficient to reimburse the Registrar for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. (h) Mutilated. Lost. Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. In case nay Bond shall become mutilated or be lost, stolen or destroyed, the Registrar shall deliver a new Bond of like amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of any such mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in substitution for any such Bond lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in connection therewith; and, in the case of a Bond lost, stolen or destroyed, upon filing with the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that such Bond was lost, stolen or destroyed, and of the ownership thereof, and upon furnishing to the Registrar of an appropriate bond or indemnity in form, substance and amount satisfactory to it, in which both the City and the Registrar shall be named as obligees. All Bonds so surrendered to the Registrar shall be cancelled by it and evidence of such cancellation shall be given to the City. If the mutilated, lost, stolen or destroyed Bond has already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms, it shall not be necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment. (i) Authenticating Agent. The Registrar is hereby designated authenticating agent for the Bonds, within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.55, subdivision 1. 3.04. Appointment of Initial Registrar. The City hereby appoints First Trust National Association, of St. Paul, Minnesota, as the initial Registrar. The Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, a contract with First Trust National Association, as Registrar. Upon merger or consolidation of the Registrar with another corporation, if the resulting corporation is a bank or trust company authorized by law to conduct such business, such corporation shall be authorized to act as successor Registrar. The City agrees to pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for the services performed. The City reserves the right to remove any Registrar upon thirty (30) days' notice and upon the appointment of a successor Registrar, in which event the predecessor Registrar shall deliver all cash and Bonds in its possession to the successor Registrar. On or before each principal or interest due date, without further order of this Council, the City Finance Director shall transmit to the .Registrar from the Bond Fund moneys sufficient for the payment of all principal and interest then due. 3.05. Redemption. Bonds maturing shall each be subject to redemption and prepayment, at the option of the City, in whole or in part, and if in part, in inverse order of maturities and, within any maturity, in $5,000 principal amounts selected by the Registrar by lot, on February 1, 1997 and on any interest payment date thereafter at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued to the date of redemption. At least thirty days prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond, the City Finance Director shall cause notice of the call for redemption to be mailed to the Registrar and to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond not affected by such defect or failure. The notice of redemption shall specify the redemption date, redemption price, the members, interest rates and CQSIP numbers of the Bonds to be redeemed and the place at which the Bonds are to be surrendered for payment, which is the principal office of the Registrar. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions thereof so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price therein specified and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bonds or portions thereof shall cease to bear interest. In addition to the notice prescribed by the preceding paragraph, the City Finance Director shall also give, or cause to be given, notice of the redemption of any Bond or Bonds or portions thereof at least 35 days before the redemption date by certified mail or telecopy to the Purchaser and all registered securities depositories then in the business of holding substantial amounts of obligations of the character of the Bonds (such depositories now being The Depository Trust Company, of Garden City, Nev York; Midwest Securities Trust Company, of Chicago, Illinois; Pacific Securities Depository Trust Company, of San Francisco, California; and Philadelphia Depository Trust Company, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) and one or more national information services that disseminate information regarding municipal bond redemptions; provided that any defect in or any failure to give any notice of redemption prescribed by this paragraph shall not affect the validity of the proceedings for the redemption of any Bond or portion thereof. Bonds in a denomination larger than $5,000 may be redeemed in part in any integral multiple of $5,000. The owner of any Bond redeemed in part shall receive, upon surrender of such Bond to the Registrar, one or more new Bonds in authorized denominations equal in principal amount to the unredeemed portion of the Bond so surrendered. 3.06. Preparation and Delivery. The Bonds shall be prepared under the direction of the City Manager and shall be executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager, and shall be sealed with the official corporate seal of the City; provided that said signatures and the corporate seal may be printed, engraved, or lithographed facsimiles thereof. In case any officer whose signature, or a facsimile of whose signature, shall appear on the Bonds shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of any Bond, such signature or facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if such officer had remained in office until delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, no Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication on such Bond has been duly executed by an authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same representative. The executed certificate of authentication on each Bond shall be conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this resolution. 'When the Bonds have been so executed and authenticated, they shall be delivered by the City Manager to the purchaser thereof upon payment of the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the purchaser shall not be obligated to see to the application of the purchase price. Section 4. Security Provisions. 4.01. Construction Fund. A Construction Fund is hereby created, as a special fund and designated on the books of the City as the "1990A Tax Increment Bonds Construction Fund" (the Construction Fund), to be held and administered by the City Finance Director separate and apart from all other funds of the City. The City hereby appropriates to the Construction Fund all of the proceeds received from the sale of the Bonds, less the amount to be deposited in the Bond Fund, pursuant to Section 4.02 hereof. Moneys on hand in the Construction Fund from time to time shall be used solely to pay capital and administrative costs of the City and HRA in connection with the Plan. Any amounts remaining in the Construction Fund upon completion of the improvements to be financed with'the Bonds and payment of all of the costs thereof shall be transferred to the Bond Fund. 4.02. Bond Fund. A Bond Fund is hereby created, as a special fund and designated on the books of the City as the "1990A Tax Increment Bonds Bond Fund" (the "Bond Fund "), to be held and administered by the City Finance Director separate and apart from all other funds of the City. The principal of and interest on the Bonds shall be payable from the Bond Fund. So long as any of the Bonds or any additional bonds issued pursuant to Section 4.04 hereof and made payable from the Bond Fund, are outstanding and any principal thereof or interest thereon unpaid, the City Finance Director shall maintain the Bond Fund, as a separate and special account to be used for the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds, and on all other general obligation bonds now or hereafter issued by the City and made payable therefrom, to finance capital and administrative costs of the HRA or City in connection with the Plan. The City hereby irrevocably appropriates to the Bond Fund (a) the accrued interest on the Bonds, (b) the tax inerements derived from the Tax Increment Financing District created pursuant to the Plan designated by Hennepin County as No. 1200 received by the City from the HRA to pay the Bonds, and (c) any other moneys appropriated or pledged by the terms of this Resolution to the Bond Fund. The City expressly reserves the right to use amounts in the Bond Fund (other than the amounts initially deposited therein upon the issuance of the Bonds) to finance or pay directly capital and administrative costs paid or incurred by the ERA or City pursuant to the Plan. 4.03. Full Faith and Credit Pledged. The full faith and credit and taxing power of the City shall be and are hereby irrevocably pledged for the prompt and full payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds. It is estimated that the tax increment and other funds herein pledged for the payment of the Bonds will be collected in amounts not less than five percent in excess of the amounts needed to meet when due the principal of and interest on the Bonds as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61. Consequently, no ad valorem taxes are now levied to pay the Bonds or the interest to come due thereon, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178, subdivision 2. If the money on hand in the Bond Fund should at any time be insufficient to pay principal and interest due on all bonds payable therefrom, such amounts shall be paid from any other fund of the City and such other fund shall be reimbursed therefor when sufficient moneys are available in the Bond Fund. If on October 1 in any year the sum of the balance in the Bond Fund plus the amount of tax increment to be deposited therein is not sufficient to pay when due all principal and interest to become due on all bonds payable therefrom in the following calendar year, or the Bond Fund has incurred a deficiency in the manner provided in this Section 4.03, a direct, irrepealable, ad valorem tax shall be levied on all taxable property within the corporate limits of the City for the purpose of restoring such accumulated or anticipated deficiency in accordance with the provisions of this Resolution. 4.04. Additional Bonds. The City reserves the right to issue additional bonds payable from the Bond Fund and tax increments pledged thereto as may be required to finance capital and administrative costs of other projects to be undertaken in accordance with the Plan. 4.05. Execution of Documents. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute and deliver on behalf of the City such documents as may be appropriate to evidence the pledge and appropriation of the tax increments by,the HRA to the.City to pay the bonds. Section 5. Defeasance. When any Bond has been discharged as provided in this section, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this resolution to the holders of such Bonds shall cease, and such Bonds shall no longer be deemed to be outstanding under this Resolution. The City may discharge its obligations with respect to any Bond thereto which is due on any date by depositing with the paying agent on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full; or, if any Bond should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged by depositing with the paying agent a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued to the date of such deposit. The City may also discharge its obligations with respect to any prepayable Bond according to its terms, by depositing with the paying agent on or before that date an amount equal to the principal, interest and redemption premium, if any, which are then due provided that notice of such redemption has been duly given as provided herein. The City may also at any time discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds, subject to the provisions of law now or hereafter authorizing and regulating such action, by depositing irrevocably in escrow, with a bank qualified by law as an escrow agent for this purpose, cash or securities which are authorized by law to be so deposited, bearing interest payable at such times and at such rates and maturing on such dates as shall be required, to pay all principal, interest and redemption premiums to become due thereon to maturity or said redemption date. Section 6. County Auditor Registration. Certification of Proceedings. Investment of Honeys. Arbitrage. Designation of Bonds as Qualified Tax Exempt Obligations and Official Statement 6.01. County Auditor Registration. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the County Auditor of Hennepin County, together with such other information as the County Auditor shall require, and to obtain from said County Auditor a certificate that the Bonds have been entered on his bond register as required by law. 6.02. Certification of Proceedings. The officers of the City and the County Auditor of Hennepin County are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the purchaser of the Bonds and to Dorsey b Whitney, Bond Counsel, certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City, and such other affidavits, certificates and information as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the Bonds as the same appear from the books and records under their custody and control or as otherwise known to them, and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the City as to the facts recited therein. 6.03. General Tax Covenant. The City covenants and agrees with the holders from time to time of the Bonds that it will not take or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents any action which would cause the interest on the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder (the Regulations), and covenants to take any -and all actions within its powers to ensure that the interest on the Bonds will not become subject to taxation under the Code and the Regulations. The City will cause to be filed with the Secretary of Treasury an information reporting statement in the form and at the time prescribed by the Code. 6.04. Use of Improvements. In order to ensure that the interest on the Bonds does not become subject to taxation under the Code, the City covenants that the improvements to be financed with the proceeds of the Bonds will be owned and maintained by the City and available for use by members of the general public on a substantially equal basis, and that the City will not enter into any lease, use or other agreement with any non - governmental person relating to the use of such improvements or security for the payment of the Bonds which might cause the Bonds to be considered "private activity bonds" or "private loan bonds" within the meaning of Section 141 of the Code. 6.05. Investment of Honey on Deposit in Bond Fund.. The City Finance Director shall ascertain monthly the amount on deposit in the Bond Fund. If the amount on deposit therein allocable to the Bonds ever exceeds the "minor portion" for the Bonds ($100,000), such excess shall either (i) not be invested except at a yield less than or equal to the yield of the Bonds, computed in accordance with Section 148(h) of the Code, or (ii) be used to purchase or to redeem Bonds. The City reserves the right to amend the provisions of this Section 6.05 at any time, whether prior to or after the delivery of the Bonds, if and to the extent the City Council determines that the provisions of this Section 6.05 are not necessary, or otherwise require amendment, in order to ensure that the Bonds are not arbitrage bonds within the meaning of Section 148 of the Code and the Regulations. 6.06. Arbitrage Certification. The Mayor and City Manager, being the officers of the City charged with responsibility for issuing the Bonds pursuant to this resolution, are authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the purchaser thereof a certificate in accordance with the provisions of Section 148 of the Code, and Sections 1.103 -13, 1.103 -14 and 1.103 -15 of the Regulations, stating the facts, estimates and circumstances in existence on the date of issue and delivery of the Bonds which make it reasonable to expect that the proceeds of the Bonds will not be used in a manner that would cause the Bonds to be arbitrage bonds within the meaning of the Code and Regulations. 6.07. Exemption from Rebate Requirement. For purposes of complying with the requirements of Section 148(f)(4)(C) of the Code relating to the exemption of certain small governmental units from the rebate requirements of the Code, the City represents that: (i) the City is a governmental unit with general taxing powers; (ii) the Bonds are not "private activity bonds" as defined in Section 141 of the Code (Private Activity Bonds); (iii) ninety -five percent of the net proceeds of the Bonds are to be used for the local governmental purposes of the City; and (iv) the aggregate face amount of all tax - exempt bonds (other than Private Activity Bonds) issued by the City in calendar year in which the Bonds are to be issued is not reasonably expected to exceed $5,000,000. Section 6.08. Interest Disallowance. The City hereby designates the Bonds as "qualified tax - exempt obligations" for purpose of Section 265(b) of the Code relating to the disallowance of interest expenses for financial institutions. The City represents that in calendar year 1990 it does not reasonably expect to issue tax - exempt obligations which are not private activity bonds (not treating qualified 501(c)(3) bonds under Section 145 of the Code as private activity bonds for purposes of this representation) in an amount in excess of $10,000,000. 6.09. Official Statement. The Official Statement, dated as of March 7, 1990, relating to the Bonds prepared and distributed by Public Financial Systems, Inc., the financial consultant for the City, is hereby approved, and the officers of the City are authorized in connection with.the delivery of the Bonds to sign such certificates as may be necessary with respect to the completeness and accuracy of the Official Statement. Public Financial Systems, Inc., is hereby authorized on behalf of the City to prepare and distribute to the Purchaser a supplement to the Official Statement listing the offering price, the interest rates, selling compensation, delivery date, the underwriters and such other information relating to the Bonds required to be included in the Official Statement by Rule 15c2 -12 adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Within seven business days from the date hereof, the City shall deliver to the Purchaser 75 copies of the Official Statement and such supplement. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to execute such notes as may be appropriate concerning the accuracy, completeness and sufficiency of the Official Statement. Adopted by the City Council on March 19, 1990. Attest: City Clerk Mayor The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member Rice and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Paulus, Smith, Rice, Richards and the following voted against the same: None whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, and was signed by the Mayor, whose signature was attested by the City Clerk. :1 CLAIMS PAID notion vas.made by Member Rice and vas seconded by Member Smith to approve payment of.the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated 03/19/90 and consisting of 28 pages: General Fund $236,106.50, Communications $11,936.00, Art Center $2,466.44, Capital Fund $11,948.00, Golf Course Fund $37,748.64, Recreation Center Fund $10,318.80, Gun Range Fund $574.57, Edinborough Park $12,619.76, Utility Fund $27,423.23, Liquor Dispensary Fund $90,947.63, Construction Fund $137,616.25, Total $579,705.82. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the meeting adjourned at.11:47 p.m. City Clerk �e`'� N 0 ��•'N�RlOB '��/ REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: GORDON L. HUGHES ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER Date: APRIL 16, 1990 Subject: FINAL REZONING AND FINAL PLAT - WALKER METHODIST AND RPI SERVICES Recommendation: Info /Background: Agenda Item # I II . A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion On June 5, 1989, the City Council heard the request of RPI Services for tax increment financing and tax exempt revenue bonds for the Edina Homestead project located in the northwest quadrant of Parklawn Avenue and York Avenue. At that time, RPI requested an annual tax increment subsidy of $70,000.00. In addition, the developers requested a tax exempt bond issue to finance the project. Since that time, Walker Methodist has replaced Ebenezer Society as the proposed owner and manager of the facility. Walker Methodist and RPI have dropped their request for tax increment assistance but continue to request tax exempt revenue bonds for the project. In our meetings with Walker Methodist and RPI, we have expressed a concern that the proposed project may compete with other elderly projects in the City which have been financed with housing revenue bonds, i.e., Edina Park Plaza and Vernon Terrace. As you know, the Vernon Terrace project is presently in default. Also, the City approved a bond refunding for Edina Park Plaza to avoid a default in that situation. Our concern therefore has been providing public financing for a market segment that appears to be over -built at this time. d Recommendation /Report April 16, 1990 Page Two In response to our concerns, Walker Methodist has prepared the attached Market Feasibility Analysis of the proposed project. This market study distinguishes the proposed project from other types of elderly housing options, namely nursing care facilities and independent congregate facilities such as Edina Park Plaza and Vernon Terrace. The market study concludes that the proposal..responds to and underserved assisted living market in our area. The proposed project has many positive aspects. It will facilitate a land exchange between 7500 York and Hedberg's which has been in the planning stages for several years. It also will provide a very positive contribution to the tax increment cash flows in the Southeast Edina area. The proponent's withdrawal of their request for tax increment financing assistance is also very positive. On the other hand, staff remains concerned that the differences between this project and other elderly projects in the City are very subtle. We are not convinced at this time that approval for this project will be without negative consequences to other assisted projects in the City, namely Edina Park Plaza and Vernon Terrace. The policy question therefore, is whether or not the City should offer tax exempt financing to a project that may adversely affect other projects that also receive such tax exempt assistance. We have advised the proponents of this concern and hope that they can respond to these issues at the hearing on April 16. The Planning Commission considered final rezoning and final plat approval for the development at its May 31, 1989, meeting. The Commission recommended approval of the 80 unit building. Since that time, the unit count has been reduced to 72. Units are removed from the upper floor in the middle of the building. The building foot print remains the same. E 6/5/89 22* DAM LWAAWau CY4 kc- 01MAINIAL LAKES - PHASE I DECK WATERPROOFING Executive Director Hughes explain at the proposed project is the deck waterproofing for the Phase I Centennial Lak lding. This work is part of the public improvements undertaken by the will benefit the condominiums. Notion was made by Commissi ce for award of bid for Centennial Imes - Phase I Deck Waterproofing to recommen bidder, Nichols & Hines, Inc., at $5,138.00. Motion was seconded by Co oner Paulus. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Richards Motion caKried. REQUEST FOR TAX IACREHLNT FINANCING ASSISTANCE - RPI SERVICES - EDINA HOMESTEAD CONTINUED TO 6/19/89 Executive Director Hughes recalled that on April 3, 1989, the HRA considered the pre-kiminary request of RPI Services for tax exempt bonds and tax increment financing assistance for a proposed project in the northwest quadrant of Parklawn/York Avenues. The proposed project is an 80 dwelling unit development designed for frail elderly. The project is designed to fill the gap between traditional senior housing and a rest home. Based upon Council direction on April 3, staff had met with the developers of the project to outline the terms of a proposed agreement concerning bond issuance and tax increment financing. The bonds would be similar to the housing revenue bonds which the City issued for the Edina Park Plaza and Vernon Terrace projects. Pending federal legislation would require that 208 of the proposed units be available at rents affordable to low and moderate income individuals. Even though this legislation is pending, if passed it will impose the 208 requirement on the project. This requirement is similar to that imposed at Edina Park Plaza and Vernon Terrace. The tax exempt bond issue is proposed to be an un -rated issue which would be privately placed to institutional investors. Under this arrangement, it is felt that individual local investors would not be affected in the event of a default on such bonds. Director Hughes explained that the proposed tax increment financing assistance for ` the project would be similar to that extended to Edina Park Plaza. By way of the proposed agreement, the HRA would agree to make an annual loan to the project of $70,000. The annual loans would commence in 1991 and would continue for 20 years thereafter. Each annual loan would be conditioned upon the following: 1. The tax increment generated from the development would have to be at least $70,000 annually. If less than $70,000, the annual loan would be for the actual tax increment generated. 2. The annual loan would be made upon receipt of evidence that the current year's real estate taxes had been paid. 3. Federal law would have to require that 208 of the units would be available to low and moderate income residents. The annual loans would continue for 20 years but not later than 2009. If the annual payments extend for the full term of 20 years, the project then must repay all annual loans to the HRA with interest over the subsequent 20 years. If, however, the project is sold to an unrelated entity, converted to a condominium or other type of housing, or refinanced, the annual loan payments by the HRA would terminate and all prior payments made would have to be repaid immediately, but without interest. The repayment of the annual loans by the HRA would be secured by a second mortgage. In connection with the proposed development, the developers are prepared to make a dedication to the City of $40,000. The developers would also pay all legal fees incurred by the HRA in connection with the project. 6 /5/89 228 Director Hughes pointed out that the proposed tax increment financing assistance for this project would result in an essentially risk -free position for the HRA. Under the proposed agreement, the HRA would make annual loan advances only if the taxes are paid by the development and only in an amount which does not exceed the tax increment generated from the payment of such taxes. Increments from other projects in the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan Area would not be required to assist the proposed development. Director Hughes concluded the presentation by saying that if the HRA wished to assist this project, staff believes that the terms outlined represent fair and reasonable contribution on the part of the City and the HRA. In light of recent defaults of housing revenue bonds in the City, the HRA may wish to discuss with the developers the credit worthiness of the proposed tax exempt bond issue. There are three approaches that,the HRA could take: 1) Insist that this be a rated bond issue, 2) That the bond issue be an un -rated issue, as proposed by the developers, that would be sold only to an institutional investor who would submit to the HRA an investment letter acknowledging that the investor understands the risks of the program, with the bonds being issued in large denominations that would avoid re -sale to small investors, and 3) That the bond issue be rated and guaranteed but also be required to be sold to an institutional investor. Director Hughes advised that Larry Olson, RPI Services, was present to answer questions. Mayor Richards suggested that, because only three Council Members were present, this matter be continued to June 19, 1989. Director Hughes noted that final rezoning and plat approval for the development are scheduled for that date. Mr. Olson suggested that at this time the Council review the work they have done with the staff to determine if, basically, they are on the track that they were looking at back in April. Craig Avery, representing the developers, confirmed that they were here to open the proposal for discussion, that they would be incurring some costs in negotiating a development agreement with the City and would be reluctant to do that without additional input from the Council. Commissioner Paulus asked: 1) How this money would be used in the project, 2) How this project would avoid the need for refunding of the bonds as was recently done for the Edina Park Plaza project, and 3) Because this project is specialized, would there be less risk of it not reaching full occupancy. Director Hughes explained that the tax increment assistance would be directed at providing the internal subsidy needed to make 208 of the units affordable for low and moderate income individuals. He said that if a bank would guarantee the bond issue at a fee, if this were to default the bank would play the role of the FHA as in the case of Edina Park Plaza, or in essence would provide a safety net for the bondholders. As to full occupancy, Director Hughes said there is'less risk that it will not be fully occupied because the operating entity in this project is the same as at 7500 York and there would be somewhat of a captured market. It may be more risky in that it is a specialized project, e.g, smaller rooms, specialized arrangement that may make it less adaptable to a re -use for other than frail elderly. Member Paulus said her concern would be the risk of having to bail out this project as was done with Vernon Terrace and Edina Park Plaza. Mayor Richards said that the City is not at risk on the bonds as it relates to those two projects. Director Hughes confirmed that both those bond issues and this one are revenue issues and are backed only by the revenue of the building and are not backed by the general obligations of the City. A default would not affect the rating of the City for general obligations bonds per se, but could possibly affect the marketability. (Commissioner Kelly entered the meeting at this point.) Chairman Richards asked if there would be a $40,000 dedication to the City regardless of what is done on issuance or non - issuance of the bonds. Director 6/5/89 22� Hughes explained that it is a larger dedication than would be expected under a traditional park dedication scenario. Chairman Richards asked what the public benefit would be if the City were to issue the bonds. Mr. Olson explained that the facility is designed to serve residents in the local area. Market studies show that approximately 808 of the tenants will come from within a five mile radius so that there is a direct benefit to the frail elderly of Edina. Chairman Richards observed that would occur with a market rate facility also. Mr. Olson said that the structure of the tax increment financing would be a loan which would be repaid to the City, with repayment secured by a second mortgage. The non - profit part of the development group is the Ebenezer Society who will own the property. Commissioner Kelly said that -she looked on this as a unique facility that would provide a different type of senior housing. Mr. Olson confirmed that it would be designed to care for the frail elderly in a manner that would provide them the ability to live with dignity in a more residential type of facility, rather than an institutional type such as a nursing home. Assisted living has been designed to meet the unique needs of this segment of the population and is a new and hybrid type of living arrangement. He said that there is no other facility of this type other than the one at Minnetonka. Commissioner Rice commented that he had looked at the Minnetonka facility and thought it was fabulous. It is fully occupied, is non - subsidized and is doing well. He asked why there was a need to subsidize the one proposed for Edina. Mr. Olson explained that the Minnetonka facility was developed in 1983 through Altcare - a joint venture between General Mills and the Wilder Foundation who contributed in excess of $1.5 Million to the research and development of the project. The tax increment assistance on the Edina facility would allow them to serve the 208 low and moderate income as would be required by pending federal legislation. Commissioner Rice asked if that is required as of today. Mr. Olson said that it was not. Mr. Avery elaborated that, if they would go to the market with these bonds today, bond counsel would not give them an opinion because of the pending legislation; they would not be marketable without meeting that requirement. The subsidy would go to the 208 tenants who meet the test for low and moderate income and who would be subsidized $300 -400 per month. He added that, on the Homestead project in Minnetonka, General Mills guaranteed the note with the bank. As to how this would benefit Edina, Mr. Avery said that they have an opinion letter from their counsel that says they can focus their marketing and set up a list of only Edina residents who would have first right of refusal if there were a vacancy in the building. Chairman Richards asked if their market research indicated that they could not fill the facility with market rate rents of $1400 -1600 per month. Mr. Avery said he did not know the answer, but that they do not feel they can build the project without the tax exempt financing and without the low and moderate income requirement they have to meet as a part of that. Chairman Richards asked if any profit making organization would be involved. Mr. Avery said that by law in order to qualify for these housing revenue bonds it is absolutely necessary, from the time this facility is in use and during the time those bonds are outstanding, that it be totally owned by a tax exempt organization. He said Ebenezer will be 1008 owners. Commissioner Rice said he still was confused concerning the effect pending legislation has on this project and asked when this would be resolved. Mr. Avery it is his understanding that the pending legislation is a technical correction to a law that has already been passed and that everyone feels it will be passed this session with an effective date as of introduction which goes back to January. He said if for some reason this legislation does not pass they would not use the tax increment financing at all but would use tax exempt housing bonds and all units would be market rate. Director Hughes elaborated that tax exempt 6/5/89 230 would mean the project is exempt from income taxes but is not exempt from real estate taxes, so it would continue to generate a tax increment. Commissioner Rice asked for clarification of the repayment of the loan and interest payment. Director Hughes explained that interest starts to accrue at the beginning of the repayment period. If at any point prior to the repayment period the project is sold or converted, the principal amount of the loan is repaid to the City without interest. If it is after the 20 -year period and a sale occurred in the 22nd year the repayment would likewise be accelerated but the HRA would also have accrued two year's interest. Commissioner Kelly asked if the agreement, whereby if the project is sold the loan payments would have to be repaid but without interest, is customary and if it is similar to -other projects in tha City. Director Hughes said that in the case of Edina Park Plaza it bore interest. In that situation the 208 requirement was based on people earning 808 of the median income; the subject project is based on people earning 508 of the median income so there is a greater subsidy that needs to be made for the 208. He noted that loans by the HRA are uncommon; typically it has been a grant to acquire the land in other projects, e.g. South Haven, Summit Point, Oak Glen. Commissioner Kelly said her concern was that the City is assisting in these types of projects to meet a need in the community and that she did not want to make it so easy that the building could be sold to a private party that would not accommodate those needs. Chairman Richards stated that he did not think the case had been made for public assistance and that perhaps it may be better to issue a check each month to those people who need the subsidy. He alluded to the other two revenue bond issues both of which are in default and said that of the options suggested by staff he would opt that if issued the bonds be required to be rated and guaranteed. Commissioner Kelly said that she would like to see the market study statistics for this type of facility to know where they are capturing this type of occupant in the community. Commissioner Rice made a motion that the request of RPI Services for tax increment financing assistance for Edina Homestead be continued to June 19, 1989. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. RESOLUTION ADOPTED APPROVING SPECIAL LAW RELATING TO EDINA TRANSIT SYSTEM Director Hughes rep ted that Chapter 241, has been signed into law on May 25, 1989. This law per the City to operate a public transit system in southeast Edina and to establisgikk4pecial service district to provide funding for the operation of that systeri!VZhe law also provides that the City of Edina and the HRA need not require public"i.dding and performance bonds in connection with public improvements benefitti .housing projects within the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan area. '. In order to become effective, the ff&44nd the City must adopt a resolution which authorizes acceptance of Chapter 241. •aff would recommend adoption. Commissioner Rice introduced the folloving^ solution RESOLUTION APPROVI TER MINNESOTA LAWS, 9 The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina;-_ Chapter 241, Minnesota Laws, 1989, as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 645.021, Subd. 2, and the directed to file with the Secretary of State a certif by Minnesota Statutes, Section 645.021, Subd. 3. and moved its adoption: 241, sots hereby approves lav and pursuant to cntive Director is f approval as required LOCATION MAP REZONING & SUBDIVISION NUMBER Z -88 -5 and S -88 -10 L O C A TI O N The northwest quadrant of the intersection of York Avenue and Parklawn Avenue. REQUEST Rezoning from PRD -4 to PSR -4 and Preliminary Plat. EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON WEDNESDAY, MAY 31, 1989, AT 7:30 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman, Gordon Johnson, R. Hale, N. Faust, V. Shaw, J. Palmer, H. McClelland MEl�ERS ABSENT: L. Johnson, D. Johnson, J. Bailey, D. Runyan, W. Workinger STAFF PRESENT: C. Larsen, City Planner F. Hoffman, City Engineer J. Hoogenakker, Secretary I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: The meeting minutes of April 26, 1989, were held over until the July 5, 1989 Planning Commission Meeting. II. OLD BUSINESS: Z -88 -5 Final Rezoning, PRD -4, Planned Residence District to PSR -4, Senior Citizen District, RPI Services Inc., Outlot A, Ebenezer Society 1st Addition 5 -88 -10 Final Plat Approval, Edina Homestead Mr. Larsen presented his staff report and noted the proposal received preliminary approval from the Commission on September 7, 1988, and from the City Council on September 19, 1988. Initially, the project was proposed as a four story 80 unit development. However, the proponents revised the plan to a three story, 72 unit building when they presented it to the Commission. The 72 unit proposal resulted from an increase in the size of a number of units. The proposed Final Development Plan has returned to the 80 unit proposal in a three story building. The building contains small and individual rooms clustered around shared parlors. Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends Final Rezoning and Final Plat approval. The proposed use and plans are consistent with the concept given preliminary approval. The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will be a relatively low traffic generator. The building design and materials are consistent with existing developments in the area. Mr. Larsen concluded staff would support a parking setback variance from York, but not of the magnitude requested. We suggest removing the most easterly eight to nine feet of the parking area which would remove two parking spaces. The parking setback would be increased to 17 feet. The three foot variance would be justified in light of the taking for the new turn lane. On -site parking should remain adequate. Conditions to approval should include: 1. Subdivision Dedication 2. Proof of land trade with Hedberg and land acquisition from 7500 York Avenue Architect Arvid Elness, representing the proponent, RPI, Inc. was present Chairman G. Johnson questioned if the building had been flip - flopped. Mr. Larsen responded that the building had been flip - flopped to accommodate the proposed revisions to the plan. - Commissioner Shaw questioned the number of employees that would be on site at any given time. Mr. Larsen explained that the proponent has indicated that between six to ten staff persons would be on site at any given time. Commissioner McClelland asked if the curb cut on Parklawn would be used a majority of the time by supply trucks and staff. Mr. Larsen said it is desired that traffic coming from the south would use the Parklawn entrance. Commissioner McClelland suggested that parking would work efficiently if visitors would park on the south and staff on the north. Mr. Arvid Elness explained the project is designed for residents who are able to care for themselves but have a need for monitoring and personal help. The facility would be staffed with 1 1/2 cooks, a housekeeping staff and 24 hour medical aide(s). Mr. Elness said this proposal is a facility which gives the public a step between private home ownership and a nursing home. Mr. Elness concluded that the facility would be constructed with wood windows and a brick facade. Commissioner Faust asked if the residents would purchase a unit or there would be a monthly rent /fee. Mr. Elness said the facility is established as rental property. Commissioner McClelland asked if they have established a monthly rent. Mr. Elness said monthly rent would be approximately $1,400 per month and would be a full service program. Commissioner McClelland asked if the facility would have elevators. Mr. Elness said the facility would have two elevators. Commissioner Shaw asked if the residents would have storage. Mr. Elness said each resident would have a 3 X 5 foot storage unit. Commissioner Palmer moved for approval subject to staff recommendations and conditions. Commissioner McClelland seconded the motion. Ayes; Hale, Faust, McClelland, Palmer, Shaw, G. Johnson. Motion carried. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MAY 31, 1989 Z -88 -5 Final Rezoning, PRD -4, Planned Residence District to PSR -4, Senior Citizen District, RPI Services Inc., Outlot A, Ebenezer Society 1st Addition 5 -88 -10 - Final Plat Approval, Edina Homestead General Location: The northwest corner of York and Parklawn Avenues The proposal received preliminary approval from the Commission on September 7, 1988, and from the City Council on September 19, 1988. The proponents have now submitted plans in support of their request for Final Rezoning and Final Plat Approval. Initially, the project was proposed as a four story 80 unit development. The original staff report addressed the 80 unit plan and recommended its approval. However, the proponents revised the plan to a three story, 72 unit building when they presented it to the Commission. The 72 unit proposal resulted from an increase in the size of a number of units. The proposed Final Development Plan has returned to the 80 unit proposal in a three story building. The building contains small and individual rooms clustered around shared parlors. The proposed development will combine the features of apartment living with some of the services provided by a nursing home. The Final Plan contains 76 one -room efficiency units and four units with a separate bedroom. Each unit contains a very small partial kitchen, typically located just inside the unit entry. Since preliminary approval the proponents have been working with City and County staff to work out access and circulation problems identified at preliminary approval. The attached plan has been approved by Hennepin County. It includes a right in - right out on York Avenue in the northeast corner of the site, and a two way curb cut on Parklawn Avenue, near York, has been eliminated. The plan also includes right -of -way dedication for the right turn lane (York to Parklawn) requested by Hennepin County. The Final Plans illustrated 37 surface parking stalls and no garages. In the PSR -4 district-an 80 unit building would require 20 garage stalls and 40 surface spaces. The proponents have submitted a Proof of Parking which would satisfy ordinance requirements. This approach is consistent with preliminary approval. Residents are not expected to have cars. The parking area in front of the building, on the York Avenue side, provides an eight foot setback from the new property line. The Zoning Ordinance requires a 20 foot setback for parking areas adjacent to a street. Thus, a 12 foot parking setback variance is requested. At the time of preliminary approval details of the building elevations and exteriors materials were very sketchy. The final plans call for a three story building, with a hip roof design and a face brick. Development of this proposal depends upon a land trade between 7500 York (current owner) and Hedberg who own a similarly size parcel south of York Avenue, in the northwesterly corner of the 7500 York site. The land trade would transfer the Hedberg development rights to this parcel. If the trade does not occur this parcel would have no development rights, since it was part of the - density calculation for 7500 York. Recommendation a Staff recommends Final Rezoning and Final Plat approval. The proposed use and plans are consistent with the concept given preliminary approval. The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will be a relatively low traffic generator. The building design and materials are consistent with existing developments in the area. Staff would support a parking setback variance from York, but not of the magnitude requested. We suggest removing the most easterly eight to nine feet of the parking area - -which would- remove two parking spaces. The parking setback would be increased to 17 feet. The three foot variance would be justified in light of the taking for the new turn lane. On -site parking should remain adequate. Conditions to approval should include: 1. Subdivision Dedication 2. Proof of land trade with Hedberg and land acquisition from 7500 York Avenue Edina Homestead Project #89171 May 17, 1989 BUILDING INFORMATION 1st Floor Footprint 2nd Floor Footprint 3rd Floor Footprint = 18,017 S.F. Gross = 18,840 S.F. Gross = 17,466 S.F. Gross Total Finished Bldg. = 54,323 S.F. Gross Above Gr. w/o canopy Basement = 9,446 S.F. Gross Gross Total Bldg. = 63,769 S.F. Gross Total-Living Space = 37,870 S.F. Gross Total Common Space = 25,899 S.F. Gross .& Support Services Total Living Space Total Support & Common Space = 40% Total 100% Total Gross Site Area = 81,241 S.F. 1001/6 Total Bldg. Footprint (Far) = 18,017 S.F. 22 °k Total Drive & Parking Areas = 29,790 S.F. 37% Total Sidewalk Areas = 6,638 S.F. 8 %. Total Green Space Areas = 26,846 S.F. 33% = 60% Edina Homestead Project #89171 May 17, 1989 Proof of Parking Requirements Approved Project = 72 Units (33) Surface Spaces Required Proof of Parking Required (18) Enclosed Spaces - - (36) Surface Spaces (54) Total 1989 Proposal = 80 Units = 80172 x Old Proj. (18) Enclosed Spaces x 80172 = (20) Enclosed Spaces (36) Surface Spaces x 80172 = (40) Surface Spaces 60 Spaces Total (33) Surface Spaces Required x 80172 = (37) Surface Spaces R I I ® I l I � ■otrrw ....,.... I I FOUNDATION PLANTING PLAN A. Arvid Elness ArcAlteets Inc Butler Forth Building Stute !IM. 510 First Avenue Furth Minneapolis• Minnesota 55409 Telel.hone 61'_ 939 .5..W . am. nt..s. rra rm euw msn. re.rwrnn o...vr. ..n am ra s�v LANDSCAPE PLAN FOUNDATION PLANTING - 2 v DOD G.II.Dee N • /� 'n W jw i!I a j 1 i I •C• i i I 1 • 1 'r , w• .wr •r .•w. 4 .w• � .•. .w. I I Y � •w• .wv VAAKIAW_ N4 , �- (e AVENUE •w 5 1 Q Arvid ElnessArchiteers Inc Butler North Buildiry.5uite 200 610 not Avenue North Minn"poln, Minnewts 55409 Telephone 612.999.6608 • mr tvrr• I..v ns wu r�r� �saovrrnm. ®w.ssu:m avr vare wlra.u.wv mloo arDS tr t+w s e4 rwr t4ee . e ®w ---V! SITE SURVEY ■ SC.Ie . IEEI IIQ. w r ro_ our twm. t.:Imr - W 4.IM 1.w• l.r Iti In r-•r. e..wr�w_wwr .... - m r•,. a.rr rT.•�.I.• - 1 � wn.M .rI sr •. • .wv w. sw.I ••_•wuuw M • r... M w Mew •, rrvll• QInI Ir Only. aw.r r s ..•_vw •lw ••n•I. r rwrr M r � nwn .._.•.._ rr nw rr •r W I. lO. awn s. iel.a. colcn•.a .c 1 Q Arvid ElnessArchiteers Inc Butler North Buildiry.5uite 200 610 not Avenue North Minn"poln, Minnewts 55409 Telephone 612.999.6608 • mr tvrr• I..v ns wu r�r� �saovrrnm. ®w.ssu:m avr vare wlra.u.wv mloo arDS tr t+w s e4 rwr t4ee . e ®w ---V! SITE SURVEY h 5w_ PLAN Ile 0) 9m EULONQ ts QIO W CARS 10ML rAVU1,11 Tj M Z� - iw Arvid EtneS3 Architects Inc Butler North Building. Suite 200 510 First Avenue North Minneapol* Minnesota 55403 Telephone 6 12.339.5508 port 16 MAY"" WG OPT T Com SITE PLAN \ w•. w r- .e•./.\ ��.♦wI �.rAy .k • «.. rr� -�..I� ..r11.4 ���� LAMU•JtiAM PLAN 1• • W-W .�r..�• .ter... err .....•.. �..... taw.. •... ew�w. .rry, row +ea+ MEN & DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL -k 1 Matwrial (-- , \ +S LsssK�Y •fin IM � .I../.N•e A •IV•O. NV V e� w•••K. M 11N P4Y.T`� ww�w�'f Y.r. �..A. m re .r.w •r.,o.rae are.. w `.► w.... -..., NT,.•.6. . 4. 4MUr/e' V APw••r�M MM1VT W .6.•t .r•O � rY�� rr .•e.•..w •.n.w.r.r..w. rM1 �rrY_so aw .... e•o .i ..w.. -i *+r r :w.�..s. we .ter... +•�.o wA — — 1:l L l� •�•r •Y/G w M Irsee . r../'•w •.s r.w.o Mir Mew.•ry Vh•M.. J•/ �.•� h r..eWp .MO�V 4r, rqI � [�^.• V "•e•s• M,.•e. • e I FW .r w •e..w.e0 • .�M.\.p Y' .••./ 1N. 6 �•Kr l w wa. •YM+n1• w..'.... • w.�+Tee. A.�' r.e•r ..•T. A- x� w N. C. W UroW AKarl,a Aesodmea YrG r:,i • Arvid ElnessArehiteea Inc Butler North Building Suite 200 510 First Avenue North Minneapolis• Minnesota 5503 Telephone 812.339 -5508 , raver oairsr rrr nm wu. ,emir m•aaaoonwre.•amn �,rt+na n ma +aeen`mow um nur i iu • nv ma.om.wwwu•mo m live o iv wde v ...•.�. Wte e6 r1 Win r e Y eYlY.�oe LANDSCAPE PLAN own I I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■tn■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■n PRC >C F 0, PARING - SITE PLAN 20 CAF.S ENC O--6 PARKMG SPACES 40CAR5 EXTERIOR PARKING 5PACE5 toOCAR:� TOTAL PARKING Q 1 I • Q ►J Arvid ElnessArchlfeen Inc Butler NoM BuiI&na Sun& 200 510 Flnt A & ue North ' -- ICI - -- • ■ Telepht 612.779.5506 and i o'e.'n' sere ••a• ..n na a!t:rna• t P R�r• W! 11�4Q • T P lQ. R41a•lRA •art[• yQ�ie LM o •� a••rt v n.caa•• P•l x �e 19s. �c .o ■■■r° Pw. !• oecnr s• ,I0 EW11 • PROOF OF PARKING PLAN MEN 0 2 Mon iiiiiii.. i ■ I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■tn■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■n PRC >C F 0, PARING - SITE PLAN 20 CAF.S ENC O--6 PARKMG SPACES 40CAR5 EXTERIOR PARKING 5PACE5 toOCAR:� TOTAL PARKING Q 1 I • Q Arvid ElnessArchlfeen Inc Butler NoM BuiI&na Sun& 200 510 Flnt A & ue North Minn polq Minncwm55 00 of - Telepht 612.779.5506 i o'e.'n' sere ••a• ..n na a!t:rna• t P R�r• W! 11�4Q • T P lQ. R41a•lRA •art[• yQ�ie LM o •� a••rt v n.caa•• P•l x �e 19s. �c .o Pw. !• oecnr s• nVI PROOF OF PARKING PLAN 2 I I 1 1 � 1 Pp'q _/_'•D_��pE 1 1 I 1. F1RfT YLOOP PLAN SCALE. � s Wit Arvid ElnessArchitetq Inc Butler North Building Suite 200 510 Fink Avenue Id Minneapolis. Minnesota 55107 Telephone 512.379.5508 1 •e•ce• ! -_P• ^e 1 — t_ ;_ nw v ery ..e •oac W e- t v M• ••• tewc• a/vvtsl�. .a •+• 1 • k acn.ccm ac••1 •c, ✓a• .K .sn v •K a•vc v •.Les•a -It to MAY 119!9 •lc o ol+.. e• cacao s ••elCl b a19• FIRST FLOOR PLAN 3 SECOND FLOOR FLAN SCALE. Arvid Elne3s Architects Inc. Butler N.,h O. Building 'Suite 200 510 First Avenue N Mjnr pe!!L Wire ,A& M403 TekVhomOI2.339.5508 wR 16 wy "M —T SECOND FLOOR PLAN 4 Arvid Elness Anhiteea Inc Butler North Building Suite 200 510 F irst Avenue North Minneapolis. Minnesota 55407 Telephone 512.779.5509 1 KRF leer. .IR P f4..I.p 4aem F ..f P JQ� .• rnr. nrtw•alo- K •K.. 1 � e ns. 4G1f.t� e•cy�t C• VQe .K len v .K Fast v wA'1�0.a W1 16 -AV 19" aG o Pew F wcco r •vor. • v nor Oste / 6evrim • BUILDING ELEVATIONS 7 Q WW ry W STU AGE �.. r i • MECtW1JICAL CLEAN �+ ; LLB �XJ F EMPL LAITBiRY LCWC5 E� CPKTS \wry/ LKRS J,EXCAVATED TENAW`r 5 TENAIJT UEXCAVATED S �+B CN GRADE STCRAGE STCRAGE SLAB CN C-.ADE E)1RK BEAUIY EIW cnOEU Dwh SHE LCUJCE s FF/90 a o m� A. COMMITY o ROOM o Arvid ElnessArchiteets Inc- Butler North Buildltlt. Suite 200 510 First Awnue North r.wnealrolu. FlinnesM 55403 " UJEXCAVATED KffG$N' . Telephone 612.339.5508 ::a w ;. • .. +r •fm r •� a � r oiRC• vl..:lla• vc rw. 1 �• a u�. •( !•err O neeaL .11 U MAT 19" fC b Opp T OICQD A �Jf• b �Ol BASEMENT PLAN 5A5Ef,'.EI•:T FLOOP, PLAN (91CALE, 6 tie•t -ta EAST ELEVATION SCA[ . 1/8' . 1 .01 A. r1r-) T1. Arvid ElnessArchiteets Inc Butler North Budding. Suite 200 Slo rant Avenue North Minneapolis. Mtnnesou 55403 Telephone U2.739.5508 t ue• r.t-r• ••. �1�. ! S.s• .0 e• t �rM� •< S +.T O �IVe Y•a an n Iuuty wet 4..[ a+�w e• ua:m w +ca:• r. stn n!L � ItVmOa 1/8' ELEVATION 8 9/19/88 257 a cerrTIVIefs up cats at sald each then unpaid installment and interest set forth separa extended on the tax lists of the County in accordance with this 5. The City Clerk shall also mail notice eial assessment which may be payable by a county, by a political or by the owner of any right- of -vay as required by b totes. Section 429.061, Subdivision 4, and if any such assessmen id in a single installment, the City Treasurer shall arrange for co ereof in installments, as set forth in said Section. Motion for of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. y Rollc IPRELIMINARY REZONING TO PSR -4 PLANNED SENIOR CITIZEN DISTRICT AND PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR ELDER HOMESTEAD (RPI SERVICES INC.). Affidavits of Notice were ??n presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Craig Larsen vl�t G presented the request of RPI Services, Inc. for preliminary rezoning from PRD -4 I, Planned Residence District to PSR -4 Planned Senior Citizen District and preliminary plat approval for Elder Homestead, generally located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of York Avenue and Parklawn Avenue. The subject property is currently an undeveloped site of 83,302 square feet owned by 7500 N York, which is located across Parklawn Avenue to the south, which is open space to Lo satisfy their zoning requirements. The propoents are proposing to develop the Lo subject property ultimately through a two -way swap of land with 7500 York after acquiring a vacant parcel immediately southwest of the site across Parklawn Avenue that is adjacent to 7500 York so that 7500 York may maintain its open space CO requirement. Planner Larsen explained that the vacant parcel immediately Q southwest of the subject site is currently within the Centennial Lakes project (Hedberg) and is zoned MDD -6 Mixed Development District. Following approval of the proposed development for the subject site, the vacant parcel would be rezoned from MMD -6 to PRS -4 Planned Residence District which would be the same as the zoning carried by 7500 York. The original proposal called for a four -story, 80 unit building with the units arranged in clusters. Since that time a revised plan has been submitted for a three -story, 72 unit building. All units would be arranged in 4 -unit clusters, each unit being approximately 450 square feet in area which would share a common parlor area of,an additional 450 square feet. Individual units would have kitchen, sleeping and bathroom facilities. Planner Larsen pointed out that this use is a new concept in housing and the question arose As to whether the zoning should be Planned Senior Citizen District or as a nursing home. Staff took'the position that since each unit for each resident will be complete and will have all facilities as opposed to a nursing home room that it should be zoned Planned Senior Citizen District. In effect, the use of the building will operate essentially as a nursing home. A site plan and conceptual floor plan has been submitted, together with a proof of parking plan as suggested by the Community Development and Planning Commission. :formally, for a 72 -unit building zoned Planned Senior Citizen District the Zoning Ordinance would require a total of 54 parking spaces, with 20 enclosed spaces. The developers would be required to enter into a proof of parking agreement so that, if in the future we found that the additional parking spaces were needed, the proponents would be forced to provide them. At this time, the garages would not be installed with the development of the project; 34 surface parking spaces would be provided as it is anticipated that the demand for parking will be minimal because of the age of the individuals who would occupy the units. The site plan illustrates a right turn in, right turn out from southbound York Avenue. The Planning Commission recommended that the curb cut be eliminated when they reviewed the project. Ultimately, it would have to approved by Hennepin County. Planner Larsen concluded his presentation by advising that the Planning Commission at its meeting of September 7, 1988 recommended preliminary rezoning and preliminary plat approval with several conditions including final rezoning, final plat approval, successful exchange of the parcels between the proponencs and 7500 York, proof of parking agreement, standard 24 -foot drive aisle width, approved drainage and 1 landscaping plans, dedication of sufficient right of way along York Avenue J sufficient to create a right turn in from southbound York to westbound Parklawn, understanding that the sidewalk along Parklawn would subject to their maintenance, and installacion of street light wires for future traffic signals. Planner Larsen advised that the proponents were present to answer questions. Member Turner asked what is allowed in terms of density for the proposed zoning classification. Planner Larsen explained that the Zoning Ordinance limits the density of the site to 67 units by requiring a lot area of 1,250 square feet per dwelling unit. A credit of 250 square feet per unit would be applied if the project were within 2000 feet of the France Avenue I -494 interchange. The project is approximately 2800 feet from the interchange. If the credit were applied, 83 units would be permited on the site. Member Turner asked if the use for the site is what was envisioned regarding traffic in the southeast Edina area. Planner Larsen responded that in the context of traffic this is an excellent use and would be a low traffic generator. Member Smith asked the proponents as to their success with this type of development. Arvid Elness, project architect, explained that they 9/19/88 258 started this type of project four years ago in Minnetonka to provide a new form of care for the frail elderly that was not quite,nursing home or apartment. Each 4 -unit cluster would be occupied by four individuals who essentially would live like a family, each with own kitchen and bath but also with a high care component. As to the market, it does not really fit the category of senior housing in the r traditional sense. It will not compete for the independent more active seniors in their housing types scattered through the City. Mr. Elness reiterated the low impact the development would have on traffic in the area and also spoke in support of the curb cut on York Avenue, both as a convenient approach for emergency vehicles and visitors. In response to questions of Member Smith, Mr. Elness presented graphics and explained the features of each floor of the units. He indicated that it would be a very residential, non - institutional environment. Member Kelly asked what the units would rent for. Mr. Elness said that in their development in Minnetonka the rates are $1,400/1,700 per month or approximately 608 of the cost of a care package in a nursing home. The development is des:gned for individuals who basically can get through the day alright with a little bit of help, i.e. help with dressing, reminder to take medications, main meals prepared. He explained that there is no medical director in the context that you would have in a nursing home but all the orders for the residents who would live here are under the direction of a physician with a full quality assurance review program run by Methodist Hospital for the residents. All of the aides and nurses are part of a Medicare certified home health agency so that if any care is covered. by Medicare that reimbursement can be gotten for the residents. No further comment or objection being heard, Member Kelly moved First Reading of the zoning ordinance and adoption of the resolution for preliminary plat approval as follows, subject to final rezoning, final plat approval, successful exchange of the parcels between the proponents and 7500 York, proof of parking agreement, standard 24 -foot drive aisle width, approved drainage and landscaping plans, dedication of sufficient right of way along York Avenue sufficient to create a right turn in from southbound York to westbound Parklawn, understanding that the sidewalk along Parklavn would be subject to their maintenance, and installation of street light wires for future traffic signals, and no curb cut on York Avenue: ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A27 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825) BY REZONING PROPERTY TO PSR -4 PLANNED SENIOR RESIDENCE FROM PRD -4 PLANNED RESIDENCE DISTRICT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS; Section 1. Section 6 of Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding the following thereto: 1 "The extent of the Planned Senior Residence District (Sub - District PSR -4) is enlarged by the addition of the following property: Outlot A. Ebenezer Society 1st Addition The extent of the PRD -4 Planned Residence District is reduced by removing the property described above from the PRD -4 District." Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR ELDER HOMESTEAD BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that, certain plat entitled "ELDER HOMESTEAD ", platted by BPI Services, Inc. and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of September 19, 1988, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval. Motion for First Reading of the ordiance and adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney First Reading granted, resolution adopted. Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen presented t for preliminary rezoning to R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District and ary plat approval for property located in the southeast quadrant of th ew Avenue/Valley View Road intersection. The Brookviev Aven the subject property is currently developed with a single family with an out building existing on the easterly portion or Valley View of the property. the site is defined as a through lot with 115 f ntage on Brookview Avenue and 156 feet of frontage on Valley View Ro reliminary plat proposed to divide the property creating one new bui The new lot will front on Valley View Road. It is proposed t w lot be zoned R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District to ew* n of a double bungalow. The lot fronting on Brookview Av as a single family dwelling lot. The new lot exceeds the lot widtt for an R -2 lot but would require a variance from the 15,000 sq rea requirement; the lot contains 12,476 square feet. The remaini lot would require a variance from the 15 foot rear setback re foot lot depth requirement; the lot measures 104 feet at area frontino. on Valley View 7500 ,VORK 7500 York Avenue South • Edina, Minnesota 55435 -4736 • Telephone (612) 835 -1010 COOPERATIVE PROPOSED STATEMENT TO EDINA CITY COUNCIL My name is Edward MacGaffey. Because I have lived at 7500 York for the past eight years, and am soon to complete six years on the 7500 York Board of Directors, the Board has asked me to make a statement at this meeting relative to the proposal now being considered. 7500 York strongly endorses and supports for Council approval the proposal for an assisted living complex to be constructed across Parklawn Avenue, on land presently owned by 7500 York. Back in the 1970's, when land was being acquired for our project, city zoning requirements necessitated our buying sufficient land to meet density requirements. The result was our obtaining "Outlet A ", as it is called, on York Avenue, north of the present Parklawn Avenue. This land has sat idle, possibly being used in winters of heavy snow as a snow- dumping.site, but really of very little other use, except to satisfy the zoning requirements. When the sale of the Hedberg mining operations resulted in the pre- sent Centennial Lakes development, one parcel, set off by its location from the rest of the Hedberg area, and now on the East side of Edinborough Way and immediately South of Parklawn, was not included in what was then sold to the Centennial Lakes developers. From a 7500 York point of view, this parcel would be an ideal trade -off for our outlet A which we've just mentioned. It abuts on our property on our Northwest, very close to our building. Acquisition of this piece by 7500 York would complete one contiguous rectangle of land -2- owned by 7500 York and would relieve us of Outlot A which is so far from our building. While we could not, and would not want to, erect a building aboveground on that side, we have developed tentative plans to build a badly needed extension of our present underground garage for resident parking. Our 338 unit apartment building, with an approximate population of 436 residents, has an existing garage with 175 parking spaces. We have a waiting list of close to 800 individuals or couples willing'to wait their turn for an apartment, but many of these people want to be able to keep a car indoors. We see this as helping insure not only the economic stability of 7500 York but indeed of all of that Southeast corner of our city. We would like to build this in the lot which is to our Northwest, rather than being forced to do it elsewhere in our property. The structure would be underground, would help future traffic patterns by providing alternative egress, to our present single entrance egress opening onto 76th street. There,is one other factor, perhaps a lesser factor, in our endorsing this proposal. Our 436 residents include some folks who are physi- cally vulnerable, who have needed temporary convalescence in an assisted living setting. There are others who up to now have had to.make such arrangements on a permanent basis a considerable distance from the 7500 York community where they have many friends. There have been wishful expressions from within our population for a care - giving community physically closer to us than what has been available. These are the reasons why the Board of Directors on behalf of the 436 residents it represents endorses and supports the proposal being considered. Thank you. April 12, 1990 M,eemf f z( /? p o Ar iw- .y e. 41 / '8io.r J of 73'a CCo / >Ie A� r?riC41 A ,v if K OvD C .t �ptdou T LldarNade rs T-0 � r� a7, c�i Yl . , � Y c: �P.,2 r !7, ae. T 1�• �' f� K I�.� n v t ci h eL P" tX Yk They art vrbanl3r�.f,,;ya I , Avvi d &%f /,;:,5 Of S-ervieE ��+�fxv. a c. a.... ri � �-.� r /f- , C o M,e eL'o r- O�.p�� -airs 'jro 1�� �C '%� a: Sou., d- C��. T SR+e, 4c LQ Co :: '7n `P� VI �7t. S �'k 1 J �/ V V L' rig X17 A7 V 11 rt k eve cri �• �� z rt �� r e u h f n- f-v PS A 3 7 Co y sti. 75 uC y °RK T I,' U MARKET FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS OF THE EDINA ELDER HOMESTEAD EDINA, MINNESOTA Prepared for: Craig C. Avery Company Creekridge Center, Suite 200 7BOe Creekridge Circle Bloomington, MN 55435 612- 941 -8055 Prepared by: Michael J. Starke and Associates, Inc. 4614 West Mitchell Avenue Cincinnati, OH 45232 513 -541 -0999 April 5, 1990 Michael J. Starke and Associates, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Summary ....................... ............................... i Introduction .................. ............................... 1 The Edina Elder Homestead Site ............................... 5 Market Area Determination and Description .................... 7 Market Area Elderly Demographics .................. 10 Analysis of Competitive Elderly Products in the Market Area .. 12 Market Feasibility Analysis ... ............................... 15 Appendices 1 - Site Evaluation Check List 2 - NPDC Senior Life Report - City of Edina, MN 3 - NPDC Senior Life Report - Edina Elder Homestead Market Area 4 - Senior Market Report - Edina Elder Homestead Market Area 5 - PCSMART Report Assumption and Summary Tables SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Scope of Engagement The purpose of this engagement was to assist Walker Management, Inc., RPI Services, Craig C. Avery Company, and Elder Homestead Corporation (the Developer), in determining the market feasibility of developing and implementing a concept known as Elder Homestead in Edina, MN (the Concept). Edina Elder Homestead The Concept has been modeled after the prototype Elder Homestead which is located in Minnetonka, MN. Conceptually as proposed, Edina Elder Homestead is a free standing, AO unit assisted living facility for frail elderly. The Elder Homestead concept is specifically designed to provide managed daily assistance with normal living activities for frail elderly. Elder Homestead is designed to meet the needs of frail elderly within a non - institutional, residential environment. The Concept is a cost effective alternative to a nursing home, and is designed and programmed to- create a more secure and more service intensive environment than an independent congregate living facility. Edina Elder Homestead Market Feasibility Analysis Page i Alternative Elderly Housing Products Given the recent interest in the elderly and their housing needs, markets across the country have become inundated with a multitude of housing and service options for the elderly. Many of these options overlap target markets and many product offerings are modified and adjusted over time as the needs of the elderly in a market are clarified. In the Edina - Minneapolis /St. Paul area there are examples of all possible types of elderly housing /care products. These include: Nursing Care Facilities - this level of care is a licensed facility which offers skilled and intermediate care provided by health care professionals. In addition to being licensed, these facilities may also be certified for Medicare and /or Medicaid. Assisted Living Facilities - terminology at this level can become very confusing. The general population has little understanding, if any, of the differences in level of care that are available. In Minnesota, Assisted Living Facilities would be classified as Board and Care Homes. These homes /facilities are licensed to provide only accommodations and personal assistance, and are not supposed to admit or retain persons requiring nursing care. Independent Congregate - living, as in.the Edina market, usually is offered in the form of apartment type living units. These developments are geared to elderly households which are totally independent and ambulatory. The Edina Elder Homestead, as proposed, would fit into the Assisted Living category. At this time, there clearly is no other product like the proposed concept within the Edina market area. Methodoloov The process defined for completing this analysis included: Determination of a realistic market area for the Project; Preparation of a detailed data profile of the market area elderly households; Edina Elder Homestead Market Feasibility Analysis Page ii Analysis of existing, planned, and proposed products in and adjacent to the market area; and Assessment of the feasibility of developing and implementing the Concept in Edina. THE EDINA ELDER HOMESTEAD SITE The site is located in a middle- and upper- income first ring suburban community of Minneapolis that has an excellent reputation. It is surrounded with compatible uses.and in close proximity to shopping, health care, recreational, and cultural amenities. The site is perfectly suited for the proposed Edina Elder Homestead. MARKET AREA DETERMINATION AND DESCRIPTION The market area, which includes the City of Edina, the western portions of Richfield and Bloomington, and the southwestern corner of Minneapolis (reaching up to about the Lake Calhoun area) is a sizeable market area with a base of 5,615 - 75+ households. It is from this base that the Edina Elder Homestead would expect to draw about 70 percent of its residents. Projections for 1994 indicate that while the overall population in the market area is expected to increase slightly (3.07 percent) and households are expected to increase by 8.00 percent, significant growth can be expected in both the 75+ population (15.96 percent) and household (17.19 percent) counts. The target market for the Edina Elder Homestead, 75+ households, is large and growing. Estimated growth potential for this market segment is one very positive indicator supporting development of the Edina Elder Homestead. MARKET AREA ELDERLY DEMOGRAPHICS The largest concentrations of elderly households in the market area are married couple and one person female headed households. The majority of persons in need of assisted living units will come primarily from the older one person female and one person male households. In 1989, it is estimated that there are 1,400 one person female headed households over the age of 80 and 197 one person male households with a head aged 80 +. It is estimated that this age cohort will continue to grow at an average rate of about 9.1 Edina Elder Homestead Market Feasibility Analysis Page iii percent over the next five years. This base will provide the majority of the potential residents for the Edina Elder Homestead. Single person elderly households in this market area have modest incomes - $9,000 - $13,000 per year. This will impact on their ability to afford assisted living units. Home values in this market area are high as compared to the Metro area. Equity realized from sale of homes in the market area will provide significant additional revenue on an annual basis to supplement income. This supplemental income could range from $7,500 to $12,500+ per year depending on personal circumstances. ANALYSIS OF COMPETITIVE ELDERLY PRODUCTS IN THE MARKET AREA At the current time there are no "free standing" assisted living products in the market area similar in nature or concept to the proposed Edina Elder Homestead. The need among market area elderly for "assistance with daily living activities" is currently being addressed by: family; home health care agencies; and nursing homes. Some independent congregate living developments in the market area are advertising "assisted living" within their units, however, the assistance is an add -on (in the form of a contract with a home health agency) into a unit that was designed and programmed for young, active elderly. There clearly is an underserved assisted living market in the Edina market area. MARKET FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS The first calculation in the series used to determine market feasibility is to calculate the number of households which are age and income qualified based upon the project assumptions. The base of 13,665 households with a householder over the age of 65 is reduced to 6,923 households with a householder over the age of 73 in 1989. (This would equate to the number of households over the age of 75 in 1991 - the target opening date for the Edina Elder Homestead.) Of those 6,923 households, the number income qualified is 3,300. When that count is adjusted to reflect a 50 percent discount for married couples (because they are less likely to choose a product Edina Elder Homestead Market Feasibility Analysis Page iv like the Elder Homestead) the age and income qualified count of households is reduced to 2322. Using that base of 2322, and applying the double need screen to determine the number of households with.a person receiving assistance and the number of those likely to choose a formal caregiver yields the number that are age, income, and need qualified for the product. The Edina market area base provides a total of 127 households that are age, income, and need qualified for assisted living units in the Edina market area. As indicated above, the Senior Market Report data indicated 127. qualified target market households for the proposed Edina Elder Homestead. This pool of 127 qualified households, when combined with persons coming out of nursing homes and households with heads under the age of 65, will support 57 to 112 total units, when the gross target market is adjusted using the other assumptions previously identified. (See Appendix 5 for detail.) It is recommended that a market share of 10 - 13 percent be used which would yield a unit potential of 57 to 72 units. Given the results of this analysis, it is clear that there is sufficient need in the Edina market to accommodate an Elder Homestead type development in the range of 57 to 72 units. Even with the introduction of an Elder Homestead of this size in the market, it is estimated that the new facility would only be addressing about 10 -13 percent of the estimated need in the market area over the next two years. Or, 1 in 9 people in need of this type of product are needed to fill the Edina Elder Homestead. It is estimated that a 72 unit Edina Elder Homestead will fill in about 17 to 22 months. Edina Elder Homestead Market Feasibility Analysis Page v INTRODUCTION Scope of Engagement The purpose of this engagement was to assist Walker Management, Inc., RPI Services, Craig C. Avery Company, and Elder Homestead Corporation (the Developer), in determining the market feasibility of developing and implementing a concept known as Elder Homestead in Edina, MN (the Concept). Edina Elder Homestead The Concept has been modeled after the prototype Elder Homestead which is located in Minnetonka, MN. Conceptually as proposed, Edina Elder Homestead is a free standing, 80 unit assisted living facility for frail elderly. The Elder Homestead concept is specifically designed to provide managed daily assistance with normal living activities for frail elderly. Elder Homestead is designed to meet the needs of frail elderly within a non — institutional, residential environment. The Concept is a cost effective alternative to a nursing home, and is designed and programmed to create a more secure and more service intensive environment than an independent congregate living facility. Edina Elder Homestead Market Feasibility Analysis Page 1 Alternative Elderly Housing Products Given the recent interest in the elderly and their housing needs, markets across the country have become inundated with a multitude of housing and service options for the elderly. Many of these options overlap target markets and many product offerings are modified and adjusted over time as the needs of the elderly in a market are clarified. In the Edina - Minneapolis /St. Paul area there are examples of all possible types of elderly housing /care products. These include: Nursing Care Facilities - this level of care is a licensed facility which offers skilled and intermediate care provided by health care professionals. In addition to being licensed, these facilities may also be certified for Medicare and /or Medicaid. Basic services provided in a nursing facility include: skilled and intermediate care; assistance with daily living activities (dressing, bathing, eating); controlled administration of medication; food service (special diets); laundry /housekeeping; and therapy (physical, occupational, and speech). Examples of Nursing Care Facilities located in Edina include: the Edina Care Center (161 beds) and Heritage (98 beds). Assisted Living Facilities - terminology at this level can become very confusing. The general population has little understanding, if any, of the differences in level of care that are available. In Minnesota, Assisted Living Facilities would be classified as Board and Care Homes. These homes /facilities are licensed to provide only accommodations and personal assistance, and are not supposed to admit or retain persons requiring nursing care. Personal assistance is usually defined as providing supervision as required and services including: help in walking; bathing; dressing; eating; and getting in or out of bed. Facilities are often able to circumvent licensing requirements and regulations by providing additional assistance to residents through home health care agencies. Often times in a market, if independent congregate facilities are having trouble filling, they will introduce some level of home health care services and begin Edina Elder Homestead Market Feasibility Analysis Page 2 advertising "assisted living" units. These units, however, were not designed as "assisted living" units and the effectiveness and efficiency of providing this level of service in an independent congregate facility is greatly diminished. Within Edina, while there are some independent congregate facilities which are beginning to offer home health care options, there are currently no free standing assisted living facilities. Outside the immediate area there are several examples including: Rosewood Estate in Roseville; and the Elder Homestead in Minnetonka. - Independent Congregate - living, as in the Edina market, usually is.offered in the form of apartment type living units. These developments are geared to elderly households which are totally independent and ambulatory. An independent congregate living facility usually provides services to its residents as part of its normal program including: one or two meals per day (in a common dining room); housekeeping; flat linen; transportation; and other similar services. In Edina there are several examples of this type of product including: 7500 York; Edina Park Plaza; and Vernon Terrace. The Edina Elder Homestead, as proposed, would fit into the Assisted Living category. At this time, there clearly is no other product like the proposed concept within the Edina market area. Methodology The process defined for completing this analysis included: - Determination of a realistic market area for the Project; - Preparation of a detailed data profile of the market area elderly households; - Analysis of existing, planned, and proposed products in and adjacent to the market area; and - Assessment of the feasibility of developing and implementing the Concept in Edina. Edina Elder Homestead Market Feasibility Analysis Page 3 The following sections of this report present the findings, conclusions and recommendations resulting from this analysis. Edina Elder Homestead Market Feasibility Analysis Page 4 THE EDINA ELDER HOMESTEAD SITE Site Location The proposed site is located on York Avenue in Edina about seven miles south of downtown Minneapolis. Edina is an upper- and middle- income community located in the first ring of suburbs outside of Minneapolis. The community contains a full range of retail - commercial, service, and cultural facilities. The site is directly across the street from 7500 York, a very successful. elderly cooperative. Site Description The site, approximately two acres, is flat and rectangular in shape. Current adjacent or nearby uses include: North - low density apartment complex; East - medium density townhomes; South - 7500 York - elderly cooperative; and West - South Haven - 203 elderly housing development. Edina Elder Homestead Market Feasibility Analysis Page 5 Perceotions of the Site An often subtle but nevertheless major concern is how residents of a community "perceive" the image of the site. This factor determines how strongly they may be attracted (or conversely repelled) by any product offering on the site in Edina due to the perceived assets and /or liabilities of the site and /or its location. Discussions with city planning staff, real estate professionals, local developers, health care professionals and others familiar with the proposed concept and the neighborhood indicate that overall the location is a definite asset. Edina has a very positive, although "upper income" image in the Minneapolis area. Edina is an address that is desirable, safe and socially acceptable. The "upper income" image, while it is positive, it could play a role in limiting the market area. Residents of the surrounding "blue collar" communities might find the "upper income" image of Edina a bit uncomfortable. Evaluation of the Site An evaluation of the location of the site using 16 different location criteria rated the site an 88 out of 100 (Appendix 1). This classifies the site as "excellent" location for the proposed use. Examples of those rating criteria which received positive scores included: availability of utility services; proximity to fire and police, medical, health, shopping; recreational, and cultural facilities; neighborhood security; access to public transportation; and compatibility of use with surrounding uses. Conclusions The site is located in a middle- and upper- income first ring suburban community of Minneapolis that has an excellent reputation. It is surrounded with compatible uses and in close proximity to shopping, health care, recreational, and cultural amenities. The site is perfectly suited for the proposed Edina Elder Homestead. Edina Elder Homestead Market Feasibility Analysis Page 6 MARKET AREA DETERMINATION AND DESCRIPTION Market Area Determination One of the most critical decisions made in evaluating the market for a facility is the determination of the market area from which potential residents will be drawn. The market area is crucial in decisions on several subsequent steps including the analysis of the demographic characteristics of potential residents which in turn leads to estimating market demand. An analysis of materials provided by the Developer, discussions with the following people: a Project Manager with the local office of an international health care consulting firm; the Marketing Director, Edina Park Plaza; an Edina City Planner; the President, Elder Homestead Corporation; the Assistant Manager, Rosewood Estate; the Social Worker at Edina Care Center and the Heritage; and the Manager, Elder Homestead - Hilltop, and MJSA research data and investigation, have led to the establishment of the following market area for the Edina Elder Homestead site. The market area was defined as the City of Edina, the western portions of Richfield and Bloomington, and the southwestern corner of Minneapolis (reaching up to about the Lake Calhoun area - See Map 1), Edina Elder Homestead Market Feasibility Analysis Page 7 = 1:1 176 MARKET AREA CONTINUES ******* SOUTH TO RIVER ****** Ed i n a E :der , -i rm e s t e -a c --a - - = -1 -' - =- =- far - e - —, - ;-= zi = ,.; - -:-' a,- , Mao The market area is defined as the geographic region from which about 70 percent of the prospective target market elderly households will be drawn to the facility. The balance of households (30 percent) would come from outside this residential market area and from non -65+ headed households in the market area (such as ones with an elderly parent living with adult children). Market Area Description Base Demographics The market area has an estimated 1989 population of 161,285 of which 21,656 are age 65+ and 8,470 are age 75 +. There are 69,304 households in the market area, 13,772 are headed by a householder over the age of 65 and 5,615 are headed by a householder over the age of 75. The median income of the 75+ households in the market area is 618,227 (See Table 1). The City of Edina has an estimated 1989 population of 47,108 of which 8,928 are age 65+ and 3,536 are age 75 +. There are 20,526 households in the City, 5,580 are headed by a householder over the age of 65 and 2,345 are headed by a householder over the age of 75. The median income of the 75+ households in the City area is $22,140. 1994 Projections It is estimated that the total population in the market area will increase to 166,238 by 1994, a modest 3.07 percent rise. Population in the 75+ age cohort is projected to increase at a much faster rate to 9,822 by 1994, a 15.96 percent increase. Total households are expected to increase to about 74,848 and 75+ households are expected to increase from 5,615 to 6,580, a 17.19 percent increase. It is estimated that the total population in the City will increase slightly to about 47,962 by 1994. However, population in the 75+ age cohort is projected to increase at a much greater rate to 4,235 by 1994, a 19.77 percent increase. Total households are expected to increase to 22,073 and 75+ households are expected to experience an increase from 2,345 to 2,852, a 21.62 percent increase. Edina Elder Homestead Market Feasibility Analysis Page 8 EDINA ELDER HOMESTEAD MARKET AREA EDINA, MN DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS ALL AGES --------------- - -- POPULATION HOUSEHOLDS HH SIZE MEDIAN HHLD INCOME AGE 65 -74 --------------- - -- POPULATION HOUSEHOLDS HH SIZE MEDIAN HHLD INCOME AGE 75+ --------------- - -- POPULATION HOUSEHOLDS HH SIZE MEDIAN HHLD INCOME 1989 ESTIMATES MARKET CITY OF AREA EDINA --------------- - - - - -- 161,285 47,108 69,304 20,526 2.33 2.30 $46,670 154,917 1994 PROJECTIONS MARKET CITY OF AREA EDINA --------------- - - - - -- 166,238 47,962 74,848 22,073 2.22 2.17 $59,001 $66,726 TABLE 1 02/20/90 1989 -1994 PERCENT CHANGE MARKET CITY OF AREA EDINA --------------- - - - -- 3.07% 1.81% 8.00% 7.54% - -4.56% -5.32% 26.42% 21.50% -------------- 13,186 - - - - -- 5,392 --------------- 15,765 - - - - -- 6,342 --------------- 19.56% - - - - -- 17.62% 8,157 3,235 9,926 3,901 21.69% 20.59% 1.62 1.67 1.59 1.63 -1.75% -2.46% $31,096 $37,429 $40,358 $48,034 29.79% 28.33% --------------- 8,470 - - - - -- 3,536 --------------- 9,822 - - - - -- 4,235 --------------- 15.96% - - - - -- 19.77% 5,615 2,345 6,580 2,852 17.19% 21.62% 1.51 1.51 1.49 1.48 -1.04% -1.52% 118,227 $22,140 $23,384 $28,698 28.29% 29.62% SOURCE: NATIONAL PLANNING DATA CORPORATION AND PROJECT MARKET DATA, INC. i rT iii Conclusions The market area, which includes the City of Edina, the western portions of Richfield and Bloomington, and the southwestern corner of Minneapolis (reaching up to about the Lake Calhoun area) is a sizeable market area with a base of 5,615 - 75+ households. It is from this base that the Edina Elder Homestead would expect to draw about 70 percent of its residents. Projections for 1994 indicate that while the overall population in the market area is expected to increase slightly (3.07 percent) and households are expected to increase by 8.00 percent, significant growth can be expected in both the 75+ population (15.96 percent) and household (17.19 percent) counts. The target market for the Edina Elder Homestead, 75+ households, is large and growing. Estimated growth potential for this market segment is one very positive indicator supporting development of the Edina Elder Homestead. Edina Elder Homestead Market Feasibility Analysis Page 9 MARKET AREA ELDERLY DEMOGRAPHICS To evaluate the market feasibility of the Edina Elder Homestead, it is important to know the age, income, household size, tenure (owner /renter), home values and rents paid by market area elderly households. Once these detailed demographic characteristics are understood for the market area, then the base of elderly households can be evaluated to determine the number of assisted living units in need. (Note: The Senior Market Report (SMR) is the proprietary data base used to present detailed information on the age, household type and income characteristics of the elderly population in the market area. SMR Tables 1 through 7 and lA through 6A are presented in Appendix 4 of this report. It is important to note that the SMR data are 1989 estimates, and that all observations refer to 1989 data. The Summary Table in this section presents selected counts from the SMR tables.) The Summary Table shows that for households headed by a person aged 65 or greater, married couple and one- person female households constitute 89.0 percent of the households. There are 13,665 market area households with a household head age 65 or older. The largest segment of these are married couple households (50.9 percent), followed by one - person female households (38.1 percent), one - person male households (6.4 percent); and "other" households (4.6 percent). Edina Elder Homestead Market Feasibility Analysis Page 10 EDINA ELDER HOMESTEAD MARKET AREA SENIOR MARKET REPORT SUMMARY SUMMARY TABLi EDINA, MN 1989 ESTIMATES AGE OF HOUSEHOLD COUNTS MEDIAN PRE-TAX INCOME MEDIAN HOME MEDIAN GROS' HOUSEHOLDER TOTAL OWNERS RENTERS TOTAL OWNERS RENTERS VALUE MONTHLY REN' ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ALL 65 AND OVER 13665 8716 4949 124,460 130,542 016,066 $168,652 $560 HOUSEHOLDS 65 -69 4688 3226 1462 $35,868 $42,025 $22,916 70 -74 3424 2185 1239 $24,664 $29,754 117,091 75 -79 2457 1452 1005 $18,749 $23,188 $12,861 80 -84 1768 1053 715 $16,890 121,727 $11,732 65 AND OVER 1328 800 528 $17,745 122,850 $11,822 ONE PERSON 65 AND OVER 5212 2237 2975 $12,645 $14,553 $11,057 $132,797 $502 FEMALE 65 -69 1410 628 782 $17,258 $19,183 $159-845 70 -74 1294 564 730 $13,790 015,669 112,087 75 -79 1108 460 648 $10,309 $11,910 69,452 80 -84 811 340 471 $9,852 $11,484 $9,127 85 AND OVER 589 245 344 $9,634 $10,957 $9,009 ONE PERSON 65 AND OVER 868 359 509 $15,396 $16,836 $14,351 $168,456 $558 MALE 65 -69 275 126 149 $23,750 $43,333 $19,375 70 -74 222 94 128 016,200 017,272 $15,333 75 -79 174 68 106 $12,872 $13,571 $12,222 80 -84 110 39 71 $11,969 $12,333 $11,315 85 AND OVER 87 32 55 $11,607 $12,307 $10,937 MARRIED COUPLE 65 AND OVER 6956 5616 1340 $35,667 $37,938 $27,957 0188,683 $680 HOUSEHOLDS 65 -69 2752 2266 486 $46,863 $50,263 $36,979 70 -74 1736 1391 345 $34,861 $36,360 028,452 75 -79 1071 843 228 $26,176 127,222 $23,152 80 -84 783 624 159 025,086 $27,391 $20,333 85 AND OVER 614 492 122 $25,892 $27,968 $21,730 OTHER 65 AND OVER 629 504 ' 125 $34,034 $34,411 $32,662 $165,384 $675 HOUSEHOLDS SOURCE: 1989 ESTIMATES BY PROJECT MARKET DATA, INC. COPYRIGHT IC1 1989 PROJECT MARKET DATA, INC. 02/10/90 In terms of owner- occupied housing, married couple households are even more dominant, constituting 64.4 percent of all homeowners. One person females are the next closest category (25.7 percent), followed by other households (5.8 percent); and one person male households (4.1 percent). In sharp contrast, one person female households form the bulk of renter occupied housing (60.1 percent), followed by married couple (27.1 percent), one person male (10.3 percent) and other households (.2.5 percent). Of the market area 65+ households, one - person female households have incomes which are only 38.4 percent of the incomes of married couple owner households; and 39.6 percent of the income of married couple renter households. The one - person elderly households in the market area have much more modest incomes in general than married couple and other households. Conclusions The largest concentrations of elderly households in the market area are married couple and one person female headed households. The majority of persons in need of assisted living units will come primarily from the older one person female and one person male households. In 1989, it is estimated that there are 1,400 one person female headed households over the age of 80 and 197 one person male households with a head aged 80 +. It is estimated that this age cohort will continue to grow at an average rate of about 9.1 percent over the next five years. This base will provide the majority of the potential residents for the Edina Elder Homestead. Single person elderly households in this market area have modest incomes - $9,000 - $13,000 per year. This will impact on their ability to afford assisted living units. Home values in this market area are high as compared to the Metro area. Equity realized from sale of homes in the market area will provide significant additional revenue on an annual basis to supplement income. This supplemental income could range from $7,500 to $12,500+ per year depending on personal circumstances. Edina Elder Homestead Market Feasibility Analysis Page 11 ANALYSIS OF COMPETITIVE ELDERLY PRODUCTS IN THE MARKET AREA At the current time, there are no directly competitive "free standing" assisted living facilities in the market area that would be similar in concept to the proposed Edina Elder Homestead. There are, however, numerous other products in the market area. An overview of these other products follows. Nursing Home Care Currently in the market area, there are eleven nursing care facilities representing a total of 1,815 beds. In summary: * the eleven facilities surveyed included 1,815 beds of which it is estimated that about 95 beds were reported available - this equates to a vacancy rate of 5.2 percent; * about 49 percent of the beds are private pay; * the fee for an "A" private bed ranged from $50.00 to $101.00 per day; +� about 23 percent of the residents were classified as requiring level "A" or "B" care; and * only three of the eleven facilities indicated that they Edina Elder Homestead Market Feasibility Analysis Page 12 made referrals of patients requiring less care to outside non- affiliated elderly facilities. Nursing homes are institutional by nature and design. They are programmed to serve a need driven client base that does not require acute care but needs more than assistance with daily living activities. Residents in a nursing home generally require 24 hour supervision and professional medical assistance. - Often times in a market, elderly persons requiring some assistance with daily living activities are forced to select a nursing home environment because of a lack of-other options in the marketplace. Independent Congregate Care Within the market area there are five facilities offering market rate (non - subsidized) independent congregate care for the elderly. One is a cooperative and the other four are market rate rentals. In summary: * the five facilities include a combined total of 924 elderly units; * of the 924, about 139 are currently vacant for an overall vacancy rate of 15.0 percent; and * all five facilities offer similar services to residents including dining room, transportation, recreational - social activities, housekeeping, and beauty /barber shop. These facilities were designed as residential - apartment style living - environments. They are programmed,to serve independent, ambulatory, "young elderly ". Independent congregate care is a "choice product" vs. assisted living or nursing care which are need driven products. While independent congregate units will often offer "assistance packages" or offer "home health care" in their units, these units are programmed and staffed to meet the needs of a more active and non -frail elderly client group. Conclusions At the current time there are no "free standing" assisted living products in the market area similar in nature or concept to the proposed Edina Elder Homestead. The need among market area elderly for "assistance with daily living activities" is Edina Elder Homestead Market Feasibility Analysis Page 13 currently being addressed by: family; home health care agencies; and nursing homes. Some independent congregate living developments in the market area are advertising "assisted living" within their units, however, the assistance is an add -on (in the form of a contract with a home health agency) into a unit that was designed and programmed for young, active elderly. There clearly is an underserved assisted living market in the Edina market area. Edina Elder Homestead Market Feasibility Analysis Page 14 MARKET FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS To determine if the proposed Edina Elder Homestead product offering fit's in the marketplace, a feasibility analysis was conducted which developed the observations and insights gained in the previous analysis into a set of working assumptions. Utilizing the Senior Market Report data, qualifying the households in the SMR by need for assistance, and the working assumptions; an estimate was developed of the number of market area households that could afford and would be in need of the type of unit being offered at the Edina Elder Homestead. Assumptions The key assumptions include: Assessment of Need: In determining the market base available for an assisted living product like Elder Homestead, it is important to quantify the number of households containing a person which requires "assistance with daily living activities." Once that universe is defined, then it is necessary to further refine the market base by estimating the number of those persons that are expected to receive that "assistance" from a formal caregiver vs. from their family. Edina Elder Homestead Market Feasibility Analysis Page 15 To accomplish this double screen, need factors were applied against the age and income qualified household counts from the SMR to estimate: 1. The number of households which contain a person receiving help with "Assistance with Daily Living" activities, and 2. The number of those households that are "Expected to Receive Help from Formal Caregivers." These need factors were developed from national survey research included in the Supplement on Aging to the 1984 National Health Interview Survey, the 1982 National Long - Term Care Survey and research conducted by the Institute for Health Planning for their work entitled "Long -Term Care Bed Need Methodologies." To insure that the screens are sensitive to the unique characteristics of the Edina market, the need factors were applied by household size by age of the householder. The specific factors are presented below. NEED FACTORS ONE PERSON FEMALE HOUSEHOLDS HH'S WITH A PERSON AGE RECEIVING HELP ADL 65 -69 9.7% 70 -74 11.2% 75 -79 14.5% 80 -84 24.4% 85+ 40.7% ONE PERSON MALE HOUSEHOLDS EXPECTED TO RECEIVE HELP FROM FORMAL CAREGIVERS 35.0% 35.0% 31.0% 31.0% 31.0% HH'S WITH A PERSON EXPECTED TO RECEIVE HELP AGE RECEIVING HELP WITH ADL FROM FORMAL CAREGIVERS 65 -69 9.2% 24.0% 70 -74 9.7% 28.0% 75 -79 11.4% 31.0% 80 -84 14.9% 32.0% 85+ 27.5% 31.0% Edina Elder Homestead Market Feasibility Analysis Page 16 MARRIED COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS HH'S WITH A PERSON AGE RECEIVING HELP WITH ADL 65 -69 5.6% 70 -74 7.4% 75 -79 11.3% 80 -84 19.2% 85+ 33.6% OTHER HOUSEHOLDS HH'S WITH A PERSON AGE RECEIVING HELP WITH ADL 65 -69 11.7% 70 -74 14.6% 75 -79 21.3% 80 -84 33.7% 85+ 52.1% EXPECTED TO RECEIVE HELP FROM FORMAL CAREGIVERS 30.0% 35.0% 27.0% 27.0% 27.0% EXPECTED TO RECEIVE HELP FROM FORMAL CAREGIVERS 8.0% 16.0% 22.0% 25.0'% 27.0% Minimum Age of Entry: Set at age 75 based on the historical experience of other facilities in the market area. Ratio of Rent to Income: Set at a maximum of 85 percent of pre -tax income, reflecting the fact that residents receive a full service /care package included in the base monthly rent. Monthly Rent: Charges covering all housing and services provided to the residents of the project. The proposed monthly rents provided by the Developer were: Studio - $1,705; One Bedroom - $2,005; and a Second Person Charge of $510. Potential Residents from Nursing Homes: Based upon the results of a survey of existing nursing homes within the market area, it is apparent that there are a number of private.pay patients occupying skilled and intermediate beds that don't require skilled or intermediate care. Based on a survey of 1,815 nursing beds, it was estimated that about 49 percent of those beds are private pay and that about 23 percent of the residents are "A or B" classified patients. These factors are used in the model to include residents of nursing facilities that are candidates for the Edina Elder Homestead but that aren't included in the residential market Edina Elder Homestead Market Feasibility Analysis Page 17 I EDINA ELDER HOMESTEAD MARKET AREA EDINA, MN +*SUMMARY OF HOUSEHOLD COUNTS BY TYPE ** --------------------------------------- - - - - -- HOUSEHOLD TYPE DISCOUNT HOMEOWNER --- - - - - -- - ONE PERSON FEMALE 0.00% - ONE PERSON MALE 0.00% - MARRIED COUPLE 50.00% - OTHER 0.00% RENTER MARKET SEGMENTATION ASSISTED LIVING UNITS STUDIO INCOME COUNT ------------ - - - - -- WITH LOW HIGH (DISC.) --------------------------- $13,300 $17,300 It $13,300 $17,300 2 -- -NA - -- -- -NA - -- 0 $13,300 $17,300 1 - ONE PERSON FEMALE 0.00% $21,800 $25,700 6 - ONE PERSON MALE 0.00% $21,800 $25,700 1 - MARRIED COUPLE 50.00% -- -NA - -- -- -NA - -- 0 - OTHER 0.00% $21,800 $25,700 0 PRELIMINARY UNADJUSTED TARGET MARKET --- - - -19- SOURCE: 1989 Estimates by Project Market Data, Inc. EDINA ELDER HOMESTEAD MARKET AREA EDINA, MN 04ia4i90 -------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 BED 2 BED --------------------- INCOME - - - - -- COUNT --------------------------- INCOME COUNT ------------ - - - - -- WITH ------------ - - - - -- WITH LOW HIGH (DISC.) LJW HIGH (DISC.) --------------------- $17,300 $51,000 - - - - -- 28 --------------------------- -- -NA - -- -- -NA - -- 0 $17,300 $51,000 3 -- -NA - -- -- -NA - -- 0 $1,200 $5x,000 40 -- -NA - -- -- -NA - -- 0 $17,300 $51,000 12 -- -NA - -- -- -NA - -- 0 $25,700 151,000 16 $25,700 $51,000 2 $32,200 $51,000 4 $25,700 $51,000 3 MARKET SEGMENTATION ASSISTED LIVING UNITS 108 -- -NA - -- -- -NA - -- 0 -- -NA - -- -- -NA - -- 0 -- -NA - -- -- -NA - -- 0 -- -NA - -- -- -NA - -- 0 !ABLE c' base. (Note: The survey indicated that the rate for a private "A" room starts at about $1,520 per month.) Potential Residents Living with 65 and Under Age HHs: Age 75+ persons with annual incomes in excess of $20,000 living with persons under the age of 65 in the market area were also determined to be a strong source of potential residents. Using Table 7 from the Senior Market Report, the number of these persons were estimated and added to the market base. Full Occupancy: Most projects experience some vacancies at some time. For the purposes of analysis, full occupancy has been set at 93 percent, assuming a seven percent vacancy rate. Percent Draw from Market Area: Only 70 percent of the residents will come from the target market; the balance (30 percent) will come from areas outside the market area and from non - elderly headed households in the market area. Upper Income Limit: Since Edina is an upscale market, no upper income limit has been set on the households which would consider the Edina Elder Homestead. (In the table the assumption value is set at $51,000 which is a default value and will pull all counts above $50,000). Estimated Market Share Rate: Based on a number of factors (market place acceptance, increasing competition, consumer familiarity, ability to get referrals from nursing facilities, etc.) the rate at which the recommended prototype can draw a percentage of the market's income and need qualified households is estimated. For this analysis a 10.0, 15.0 and 20.0 percent were tested. Edina Elder Homestead Market Feasibility Analysis Page le Calculation of the Adjusted Target Market The first calculation in the development of the Adjusted Target Market is to calculate the number of households which are age and income qualified based upon the previous set of assumptions. The base of 13,665 households with a householder over the age of 65 is reduced to 6,923 households with a householder over the age of 73 in 1989. (This would equate to the number of households over the age of 75 in 1991 - the target opening date for the Edina Elder Homestead.) Of those 6,923 households, the number income qualified is 3,300. When that count is adjusted to reflect a 50 percent discount for married couples (because they are less likely to choose a product like the Elder Homestead) the age and income qualified count of households is reduced to 2322. Using that base of 2322, and applying the double need screen to determine the number of households with a person receiving assistance and the number of those likely to choose a formal caregiver yields the number that are age, income, and need qualified for the product. Table 2 presents the preliminary calculations of the Adjusted Target Market (ATM) based on appropriate Market Segmentation for the proposed Edina Elder Homestead. The ATM represents a count of households in the market area that are age, income, and need qualified for the product. The market area base provides a total of 127 households that are age, income, and need qualified for' assisted living units in the Edina market area. As indicated above, the Senior Market Report data indicated 127 qualified target market households for the proposed Edina Elder Homestead. This pool of 127 qualified households, when combined with persons coming out of nursing homes and households with heads under the age of 65, will support 57 to 112 total units, when the gross target market is adjusted using the other assumptions previously identified. (See Appendix 5 for detail.) The range of units, 57 to 112, is based upon the use of three market share factors - 10, 15 and 20 percent. At this point in the evolution of the assisted living industry, it is a judgement call as to which market share factor is more realistic. Given the number of nursing homes in the market area which are formally affiliated with other types of existing elderly facilities and therefore invested in directing referrals to those facilities, it is recommended that a more conservative market share be used to Edina Elder Homestead Market Feasibility Analysis Page 19 estimate unit potential. It is recommended that a market share of 10 - 13 percent be used which would yield a unit potential of 57 to 72 units. Given the results of this analysis, it is clear that there is sufficient need in the Edina market to accommodate an Elder Homestead type development in the range of 57 to 72 units. Even with the introduction of an Elder Homestead of this size in the market, it is estimated that the new facility would only be addressing about 10 -13 percent of the estimated need in the market area over the next two years. Or, 1 in 9 people in need of this type of product are needed to fill the Edina Elder Homestead. Estimated Absorption Rate The absorption rate for an Edina Elder Homestead will be directly affected by the quality and focus of the marketing program developed for the facility. Given the preceding analysis, it is evident that sufficient qualified households exist to fill the Elder Homestead. Assuming this to be true, the issue then becomes one of educating the target audience about the product and encouraging them to consider Elder Homestead. There are both obstacles to overcome and opportunities to exploit. For example: * One obstacle to overcome will be the shift from a home to a studio or one bedroom apartment. There is a high incidence of home ownership in the market area, backed -up by very credible home health care providers. It will be difficult to dislodge people from their homes. One opportunity to exploit, is the overserved and overcharged residents currently in market area nursing homes. Given the competitive price and value advantage of the proposed Elder Homestead package, an existing nursing home resident in a private room, can be put in a studio in the proposed Elder Homestead - have more room - and still save from $5 to $40 per day. Assuming that an effective marketing program can be developed to overcome the obstacles in the market and exploit the oppor- tunities, it' is estimated that the absorption rate will run at about 3 -4 units per month. This would fill 67 units (72 - 5 vacants) in 17 to 22 months. Edina Elder Homestead Market Feasibility Analysis Page 20 Conclusions Given the results of this analysis, it is clear that there is sufficient need in the Edina market to accommodate an Elder Homestead type development in the range of 57 to 72 units. Even with the introduction of an Elder Homestead of this size in the market, it is estimated that the new facility would only be addressing about 10 -13 percent of the estimated need in the market area over the next two years. It is estimated that a 72 unit Edina Elder Homestead will fill in about 17 to 22 months. Edina Elder Homestead Market Feasibility Analysis Page 21 APPENDIX 1 Site Evaluation Check List Elderly Housing Site Evaluation Check List Project: 1-1-In1A ELDER. Date: Thm?ofte`f 1910 Location: MIKA HM Client: C -k1� L° " Cc CMpojy 1. Site Services Available: Gas Electricity Water Sewer Telephone Yes--L–(4) No —a Yes,&_(4) No (0) Yes__J_(4) No (0) Yes--X—(4) No _Q Yes__X_(4) No (0) 2. Vehicular Access to Site: From quiet residential street From secondary commercial street From busy primary artery 3. Property Zoning: Zoned for elderly housing Can be rezoned for elderly housing 4. Fire and Police Protection Proximity: 0-1 Mile (6) 1 -5 Miles L_(3) 5-10 Miles (1) Does not exist Q S. Emergency Health Care Proximity: 0-1 Mile (6) 1 -5 Miles __X_(3) 5-10 Miles (1) Does not exist (0) 6. Full Service Hospital Proximity: 0-1 Mile __j_(6) 1 -5 Mlles (3) 5-10 Miles (1) Greater than 10 Miles (f7) 7. Degree of Neighborhood Safety /Security: Very safe —JC_(6) Average (3) Security required (1) (5) —_(1) S. Cultural Facility Proximity: (e.g.. Theatre, Library, Museum, etc.) 0-5 Blocks ___%__(5) 1 /s -1 Mile (3) 1 -5 Mlles (1) 5-10 Miles 0 9. Religious Facility Proximity: 0.5 Blocks _Y.'_(6) r/s -1 Mile (3) 1 -5 Mlles (1) 5-10 Mlles 0 (5) _(3) Michael J. Starke and Associates, Inc. Elderly Housing Site E, Iva�.luation Check List Page 2 of 2 Project: Dater 10. Convenience Shopping Proximity: (e.g., Bank, Drugstore, Cleaners, Deli, etc.) 0-5 Blocks j?�—'(5) 1/2 -1 Mile (3) 1 -5 Mlles (1) 5-10 Miles 0 11. Parks & Recreation Facility Proximity: 0-5 Blocks j?�—'(5) 1/2 -1 Mile (3) 1 -5 Miles (1) 5-10 Miles 0 12. Major Shopping Mall Proximity: 0-5 Miles X (5) 5-10 Miles Q 10-20 Miles (1) 13. Public Transportation Access Point: At Site j?�—'(5) 2 Blocks (3) 5 Blocks (1) Does not exist 0 14. Surrounding Property Value: Comparable (5) Lower (3) Higher (1) 15. Project Design, Compatibility with Surrounding Neighborhood (Example: Highrise in Neighborhood of Single Family Bungalows not Compatible): Yes_ 'Ne (5) No -O 16. Nearest Similar Facility: 5-10 Miles (5) 1 -5 Miles (3) 0.1 Mile (1) TOTAL SCORE: Scoring: Maximum Score = 100 Points 85 to 100 Excellent Should appeal to wide market. 701085 Good Site Depending on negatives — may have, slightly limited market range. 55 to 70 Average Site Need to carefully evaluate negatives — may have limited marketability. 0 to 55 Below Average May be more risks than necessary — get several additional opinions. Michael J. Starke and Associates, Inc. APPENDIX 2 NPDC Senior Life Report City of Edina, MN Senior Life Tabulation (Page 1 of 3) Study Area Summary - City of Edina, MN ---- - - - - -- Population by Sex--- - - - - -- Pop. 1980 1989 1994 By Sex Census (Est.) (Prof.) Total 46073 47108 47962 Male 21787 22332 22739 Female 24286 24776 25223 Tot.( %) 100.0 100.0 100.0 Male( %) 47.3 47.4 47.4 Fem.(%) 52.7 52.6 52.6 Max Area Evaluation Svstem 7- FES -90 - - -- Household Income HH Inc. 1980 ($OOOS) Census Total 17961 < 7.5 1405 7.5 -14.9 2396 15 -24.9 3589 25 -34.9 3003 35 -49.9 3157 50 -74.9 2552 >= 75 1859 Median($) 30209 Population 55 Years of Age and Older by Age and Sex: Distribution - - -- 1989 1994 (Est.) (Proj.) 20526 22073 847 752 1184 1004 2038 1725 2078 1932 3242 2671 4444 4413 6693 9576 54917 66726 --------------------- - - - - -- Population by Age--------------------- - - - - -- Pop. ---- - - - - -- 1980--- - - - - -- - - -- -1989 Estimate - - -- - -- -1994 Projection--- - By Sex - - - - -- - 55 -64 - - - - -- 65 -74 - - - - - -- 75+ - - - - - -- 55 -64 65 -74 - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - 75+ - - -- 55 -64 - - - 65 -74 - 75+ Total 6239 3826 2865 6910 5392 - 3536 - - -- - 6271 - - - -- - 6342 - - - - -- 4235 Male 2963 1606 929 3236 2414 1197 2910 2811 1481 Female 3276 2220 1936 3674 2978 2339 3361 3531 2754 Tot.(%) 13.5 8.3 6.2 14.7 11.4 7.5 13.1 13.2 8.8 Male( %) 6.4 3.5 2.0 6.9 5.1 2.5 6.1 5.9 3.1 Fem.( %) 7.1 4.8 4.2 7.8 6.3 5.0 7.0 7.4 5.7 Households by Household Income and Age of Householder: Hhld. ------------------- - - - - -- -Age of Householder---------- - - - - -- Income ---- - - - - -- 1979--- - - - - -- - - -- -1989 Estimate - - - -- - -- -1994 Projection-- - ($000S) 55 -64 65 -74 75+ 55 -64 65 -74 75+ 55 -64 65 -74 - 75+ -- - - - - -- Total - - - - - -- 3703 - - - - - -- 2330 - - - - - -- 1936 - - - - - -- - 4158 - - - - -- - 3235 - - - - -- 2345 - - - - - -- 3840 -- - - - -- 3901 - - - - -- 2852 < 7.5 150 281 637 89 189 390 57 199 363 7.5 -14.9 316 626 530 140 272 447 99 244 390 15 -24.9 667 640 396 252 583 471 163 485 501 25 -34.9 618 306 152 335 454 335 198 515 441 35 -49.9 732 171 105 533 591 327 363 592 412 50 -74.9 680 172 67 923 527 151 708 692 310 >= 75 540 134 49 1886 619 224 2252 1174 435 Median($) 36763 18871 12194 69403 37429 22140 96795 48034 28698 Total( %) 20.6 13.0 10.8 20.3 15.8 11.4 17.4 17.7 12.9 < 7.5 0.8 1.6 3.5 0.4 0.9 1.9 0.3 0.9 1.6 7.5 -14.9 1.8 3.5 3.0 0.7 1.3 2.2 0.4 1.1 1.8 15 -24.9 3.7 3.6 2.2 1.2 2.8 2.3 0.7 2.2 2.3 25 -34.9 3.4 1.7 0.8 1.6 2.2 1.6 0.9 2.3 2.0 35 -49.9 4.1 1.0 0.6 2.6 2.9 1.6 1.6 2.7 1.9 50 -74.9 3.8 1.0 0.4 4.5 2.6 0.7 3.2 3.1 1.4 >= 75 3.0 0.7 0.3 9.2 3.0 1.1 10.2 5.3 2.0 it Senior Life Tabulation (Page 2 of 3) Study Area Summary - City of Edina, MN Max Area Evaluation System 7- FEB -90 Per Capita Income(1979) by Age 1980 Population by Age and Race or In 1980: - I Spanish Origins Pct. Number Pct. Total PCI 55 -64 65 -74 75+ --- - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- Race /Span. Total Pop. ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- 65+ - - - % 65+ (�) 15703 26212 17750 11217 Total 46073 - - -- 6691 - - - -- 14.5 0.3 White 45333 6666 14.5 637 Black 235 5 0.0 50 - 75 Asian 327 12 0.0 537 Span. Or. 220 9 0.0 1980 Specified Owner - Occupied Housing Units Including Condominiums by Housing Value and Age of Householder: Housing ---------------- - - - - -- -Age of Householder In Value - - - - -- Total - - - -- - - - -55 To 64 - - -- - - - -65 To ($OOOS) Number - Pct. Number Pct. Number - - - - - -- Total - - - - -- 12708 - - - - - -- 100.0 - - - - - -- 3035 - - - - - -- 23.9 - - - - - -- 1636 < 25 36 0.3 0 0.0 13 25 - 50 637 5.0 136 1.1 132 50 - 75 2741 21.6 562 4.4 537 75 -100 3665 28.8 1047 8.2 453 100 -150 3479 27.4 913 7.2 341 150 -200 1329 10.5 275 2.2 73 >= 200 821 6.5 102 0.8 87 Median($) 95055 94568 1980--------------- - - - - -- 74---- ------ 75 -------- Pct. Number Pct. - - - - - -- 12.9 - - - - - -- 978 - - - - - -- 7.7 0.1 17 0.1 1.0 169 1.3 4.2 357 2.8 3.6 269 2.1 2.7 87 0.7 0.6 37 0.3 0.7 42 0.3 82506 0.5 71218 1980 Occupied Housing Units by Tenure, Age of Householder And Year Moved Into Housing Unit: Year Moved Into Unit Total 1979 -1980 1975 -1978 1970 -1974 1960 -1969 1950 -1959 Before 1950 Year Moved Total 1979 -1980 1975 -1978 1970 -1974 1960 -1969 1950 -1959 Before 1950 Total Occupied Number Pct. 17961 100.0 3702 20.6 5046 28.1 3201 17.8 3819 21.3 1736 9.7 457 2.5 --- - - - - -- -Age of Householder in All Owner Occ. Owner 55 -64 YR Number Pct. Number Pct. - - - - - -- 1.3656 - - - - -- 76.0 - - - - - -- 3245 - - - - -- 184. 1626 9.1 135 0.8 3660 20.4 513 2.9 2592 14.4 519 2.9 3609 20.1 1130 6.3 1722 9.6 852 4.7 447 2.5 96 0.5 All Renter Occ 4305 24.0 2076 11.6 1386 7.7 609 3.4 210 1.2 14 0.1 10 0.1 Rent. 55 -64 YR 477 2.7 154 0.9 199 1.1 94 0.5 28 0.2 0 0.0 2 0.0 1980------- - - - - -. Owner 65+ YR. Number Pct. 2778 15.5 300 1.7 496 2.8 309 1.7 683 3.8 639 3.6 351 2.0 Renter 65+ YR. 1418. 7.9 301 1.7 556 3.1 401 2.2 152 0.8 0 0.0 8 0.0 MJ1 Senior Life Tabulation (Page 3 of 3) Study Area Summary - City of Edina, MN Max Area Evaluation System 7- FES -90 1980 Population 60 Years and Older by Household Type and Relationship: Household Type & Relationship --------------- Total Living Alone In Families: Hholder Spouse Other In Nonfamilies: Hholder Other In Group Quart: Home For Aged Other --------------- - - - - -- Population by Age------------------ - - - - -- 60 Yr. & Over 60 To 64 Years 65 To 74 Years 75 Yr. & Over Number Pct. Number -- Pct. Number Pct. - - - -- Number Pct. -- - - - - -- 9593 - - - -- 100.0 - - - - -- 2902. - - - -- 30.3 -- - - - - -- 3735 38.9 -- - - - - -- 2956 - - - -- 30.8 2279 23.8 322 3.4 889 9.3 1068 11.1 3586 37.4 1334 13.9 1412 14.7 840 8.8 2890 30.1 1164 12.1 1278 13.3 448 4.7 457 4.8 49 0.5 77 0.8 331 3.5 65 0.7 12 0.1 31 0.3 22 0.2 67 0.7 15 0.2 28 0.3 24 0.3 249 2.6 6 0.1 20 0.2 223 2.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1980 Households by Household Type and Presence of 1 or More Persons 65 Years and Older: Household Type ------------------ - - - - -- Total Households Family Household Nonfamily Household: Living Alone Other Non- Family ----------- Households---- - - - - -- Total Pct. 65+ * Pct. - - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - -- 17961 100.0 4718 26.3 12953 72.1 2701 15.0 4299 23.9 1952 10.9 709 3.9 65 0.4 * Represents households with one or more persons 65 years Note: The percentages shown in the table on page 1 entitled "The Population 55 Years of Age and Older by Age and Sex" are based on the total population for the respective year, presented in the table at the top left of page 1. The percentages shown in the table on page 1 entitled "Households By Household Income And Age Of Householder 55 Years Of Age And Older" are based on the total households for the respective year, presented in the table at the top right of page 1. In each of the tables on pages 2 and 3, the base for each percentage in a particular table is the count appearing in the upper left of the table, which corresponds to the data universe described in the title for the particular table. 1989 estimates and 1994 projections produced by National Planning Data Corp. IfT Senior Life Tabulation (Added Detail) 55 -59 Max Area Evaluation System Study Area Summary - City of Edina, MN - - - - - -- 1221 - - - - - -- 1109 7- FES -90 - - - - - -- 961 Under $7,500 ---------------- - - - - -- Population by Age --------------------- Pop. By Sex - - - .55 -59 60 -64 - - - - - 65 -69 - - - - - -- 70 -74 - - - -- 75 -79 - - - - - -- 80 -84 - - - - 85+ ----- 1980 - -- Persons - - - - - -- 3512 -- 2727 2102 - - 1724 1316 - -- - 922 - - - - -- 627 1989 Persons 3332 3578 3143 2249 1546 1027 963 1989 Male 1573 1663 1441 973 609 334 254 1989 Female 1759 1915 1702 1276 937 693 709 1994 Persons 3053 3218 3467 2875 1921 1151 1163 1994 Male 1425 1485 1557 1254 770 406 305 1994 Female 1628 1733 1910 1621 1151 745 858 Household Income ---------- - - - - -- -Age of Householder----------- - - - - -- (In $000's) 55 -59 60 -64 65 -69 70 -74 75 -79 80+ ----------- - - - - -- 1980(1979) Total - - - - - -- 2034 - - - - - -- 1669 - - - - - -- 1221 - - - - - -- 1109 - - - - - -- 975 - - - - - -- 961 Under $7,500 47 103 103 178 290 347 $ 7,500 - $14,999 151 165 280 346 264 266 $15,000 - $19,999 157 190 168 164 145 79 $20,000 - $24,999 156 164 193 115 97 75 $25,000 - $29,999 162 98 107 76 52 60 $30,000 - $34,999 238 120 67 56 20 20 $35,000 - $39,999 156 120 56 32 28 22 $40,000 - $49,999 215 241 43 40 17 38 $50,000 - $74,999 426 254 127 45 34 33 $75,000 and over 326 214 77 57 28 21 1979 Median ($) 38397 34771 21541 15930 13111 11264 1989 Total 1907 2251 1812 1423 1097 1248 Under $7,500 21 68 76 113 147 243 $ 7,500 - $14,999 39 101 127 145 188 259 $15,000 - $19,999 48 79 130 155 110 123 $20,000 - $24,999 48 77 133 165 112 126 $25,000 - $29,999 62 91 113 135 100 94 $30,000 - $34,999 74 108 114 92 90 51 $359000 - $39,999 61 96 130 80 65 50 $40,000 - $49,999 164 212 251 130 100 112 $50,000 - $74,999 475 448 312 215 81 70 $75,000 and over 915 971 426 193 104 120 1989 Median ($) 72974 66378 43307 29944 24621 19959 1994 Total 1773 2067 2049 1852 1407 1445 Under $7,500 14 43 62 137 135 228 $ 7,500 - $14,999 28 71 110 134 180 210 $15,000 - $19,999 25 53 91 126 124 140 $20,000 - $24,999 32 53 108 160 116 121 $25,000 - $29,999 34 56 109 165 116 120 $30,000 - $34,999 43 65 97 144 109 96 $35,000 - $39,999 55 73 106 103 105 61 $40,000 - $49,999 98 137 222 161 135 111 $50,000 - $74,999 348 360 416 276 169 141 $75,000 and over 1096 1156 728 446 218 217 1994 Median ($) 103672 90895 57181 37913 31491 25979 -- 'APPENDIX 3 NPDC Senior Life Report Edina Elder Homestead Market Area Senior Life Tabulation (Page 1 of 3) Max Area Evaluation System Study Area Summary - Edina Elder Homestead Market Area 7- FEB -90 ---- - - - - -- Population by Sex--- - - - - -- Pop. 1980 1989 1994 By Sex Census (Est.) (Proj.) - - - - -- - - - - -- Total - - - - -- 154306 - - - - -- 161285. 166238 Male 72695 76623 79030 Female 81611 84662 87208 Tot.( %.) 100.0 100.0 100.0 Male( %) 47.1 47.5 47.5 Fem.( %) 52.9 52.5 52.5 - - -- Household Income Distribution - - -- HH Inc. 1980 1989 1994 ($OOOS) -- - - - - -- Census - - - - -- (Est.) - - - - -- (Proj.) Total 60205 69304 - - - - -- 74848 < 7.5 5990 3406 2852 7.5 -14.9 10049 4840 3795 15 -24.9 13574 8372 6855 25 -34.9 12244 8002 7125 35 -49.9 10099 13019 10607 50 -74.9 5288 16896 17193 >= 75 2961 14769 26421 Median($) 25377 46670 59001 Population 55 Years of Age and Older by Age and Sex: --------------------- - - - - -- Population by Age--------------------- - - - - -- Pop. ---- - - - - -- 1980--- - - - - -- - - -- -1989 Estimate - - -- - -- -1994 Projection--- - By Sex - -- - 55 -64 - - - - -- 65 -74 - -- 75+ 55 -64 65 - - -74 75+ 55 -64 - - 65 -74 75+ - - - Total - 16308 - - - 9604 - - - - - -- 7826 - - - - -- - 18413 - - - -- - - 13186 - - - -- 8470 - - - -- - 17819 - - - - -- - 15765 - - - - -- 9822 Male 7629 3854 2375 8616 5831 2723 8318 6995 3314 Female 8679 5750 5451 9797 7355 5747 9501 8770 6508 Tot.( %) 10.6 6.2 5.1 11.4 8.2 5.3 10.7 9.5 5.9 Male( %) 4.9 2.5 1.5 5.3 3.6 1.7 5.0 4.2 2.0 Fem.( %) 5.6 3.7 3.5 6.1 4.6 3.6 5.7 5.3 3.9 Households by Household Income and Age of Householder: Hhld. ------------------- - - - - -- -Age of Householder-------------------------- Income ---- - - - - -- 1979--- - - - - -- - - -- -1989 Estimate - - - -- - -- -1994 Projection-- - ($000S) 55 -64 65 -74 75+ 55 -64 65 -74 75+ 55 -64 65 -74 75+ -- - - - - -- Total - - - - - -- 9755 - - - - - -- 5976 - - - - - -- 5173 - - - - - -- - 11320 - - - - -- - 8157 - - - - -- 5615 - - - - - -- 11141 ------- 9926 - - - - -- 6580 < 7.5 573 1111 2016 317 729 1150 204 682 1039 7.5 -14.9 1115 1754 1531 492 1003 1257 316 856 1102 15 -24.9 2074 1552 916 898 1664 1231 598 1490 1346 25 -34.9 2033 687 333 1148 1175 718 736 1389 1027 35 -49.9 1993 412 190 2047 1406 628 1395 1694 817 50 -74.9 1179 256 95 2985 1216 309 2713 1676 581 >= 75 788 204 92 3433 964 322 5179 2139 668 Median($) 30349 16058 10288 55985 31096 18227 72842 40358 23384 Total( %) 16.2 9.9 8.6 16.3 11.8 8.1 14.9 13.3 8.8 < 7.5 1.0 1.8 3.3 0.5 1.1 1.7 0.3 0.9 1.4 7.5 -14.9 1.9 2.9 2.5 0.7 1.4 1.8 0.4 1.1 1.5 15 =24.9 3.4 2.6 1.5 1.3 2.4 1.8 0.8 2.0 1.8 25 -34.9 3.4 1.1 0.6 1.7 1.7 1.0 1.0 1.9 1.4 35 -49.9 3.3 0.7 0.3 3.0 2.0 0.9 1.9 2.3 1.1 50 -74.9 2.0 0.4 0.2 4.3 1.8 0.4 3.6 2.2 0.8 >= 75 1.3 0.3 0.2 5.0 1.4 0.5 6.9 2.9 0.9 i r Senior Life Tabulation (Page 2 of 3) Max Area Evaluation System Study Area Summary - Edina Elder Homestead Market Area 7- FEB -90 Per Capita Income(1979) by Age In 1980: 1980 Population by Age and Race or Spanish Origins Total PCI 55 -64 65 -74 75+ Race /Span. --- - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- Total Pop. ---- - - - 65+ % 65+ ($) 12101 20625 13668 8870 Total - -- 154306 - - - - - -- 17430 - - - -- 11.3 White 150615 17339 Pct. Black 1145 18 0.0 Asian 1611 47 0.0 Span. Or. 849 27 0.0 1980 Specified Owner- Occupied Housing Units Including Condominiums by Housing- Value and Age of Householder: Housing ---------------- - - - - -- -Age of Householder In 1980--------------- - - - - -- Value - - - - -- Total - - - -- - - - -55 To 64 - - -- - - - -65 To 74 - - -- ------75+------- ($000S) Number -- Pct. - - - Number - Pct. Number Pct. Number Pct. - - - - - -- Total - - - - - 38272 - - -- 100.0 - - - - -- 7491 - - - - - -- 19.6 - - - - - -- 3839 - - - - - -- 10.0 - - - - - -- 2371 - - - - - -- 6.2 < 25 220 0.6 49 0.1 51 0.1 62 0.2 25 - 50 3092 8.1 699 1.8 554 1.4 616 1.6 50 - 75 15130 39.5 2883 7.5 1730 4.5 1077 2.8 75 -100 10230 26.7 2101 5.5 839 2.2 376 1.0 100 -150 6675 17.4 1304 3.4 482 1.3 134 0.4 150 -200 1909 5.0 341 0.9 84 0.2 58 0.2 >= 200 1016 2.7 114 0.3 99 0.3 48 0.1 Median($) 0.5 76696 1.4 76362 68996 10.0 61780 1980 Occupied Housing Units by Tenure, Age of Householder And Year Moved Into Housing Unit: Year Moved Into Unit Total 1979 -1980 1975 -1978 1970 -1974 1960 -1969 1950 -1959 Before 1950 Year Moved Total 1979 -1980 1975 -1978 1970 -1974 1960 -1969 1950 -1959 Before 1950 --- - - - - -- -Age of Householder in 1980------ - - - - -- Total Occupied All Owner Occ. Owner 55 -64 YR Owner 65+ YR. Number Pct. Number Pct. Number Pct. Number Pct. - - - - - -- 60190 - - - - -- 100.0 - - - - - -- - 42040 - - - -- 69.8 - - - - - -- 8297 - - - - -- 13.8 - - - - - -- - 7100 - - - -- 11.8 13661 22.7 5229 8.7 293 0.5 430 0.7 17200 28.6 11197 18.6 1189 2.0 718 1.2 8723 14.5 6719 11.2 959 1.6 556 0.9 11816 19.6 10448 17.4 2693 4.5 1529 2.5 6537 10.9 6338 10.5 2786 4.6 2178 3.6 2253 3.7 2109 3.5 377 0.6 1689 2.8 All Renter Occ Rent. 55 -64 YR Renter 65+ YR. - -- - - - - - -- - 18150 - - - -- 30.2 - - - - - -- 1482 - - - - -- 2.5 - - - - - -- - 4270 - - 7.1 8432 14.0 331 0.5 820 1.4 6003 10.0 569 0.9 1374 2.3 2004 3.3 298 0.5 1036 1.7 1368 2.3 226 0.4 BOB 1.3 199 0.3 41 0.1 112 0.2 144 0.2 17 0.0 120 0.2 If II Senior Life Tabulation (Page 3 of 3) Max Area Evaluation System Study Area Summary - Edina Elder Homestead Market Area 7- FES -90 1980 Population 60 Years and Older by Household Type and Relationship: Household Type & Relationship --------------- Total Living Alone In Families: Hholder Spouse Other In Nonfamilies: Hholder Other In Group Quart: Home For Aged Other --------------- - - - - -- Population by Age------------------ - - - - -- 60 Yr. & Over 60 To 64 Years 65 To 74 Years 75 Yr. & Over Number Pct. Number Pct. Number Pct. Number Pct. -- - - - - -- - - - -- -- - - - - -- - - - -- -- - - - - -- - - - -- -- - - - - -- - - - -- 24544 100.0 7106 29.0 9391 38.3 8047 32.8 6221 25.3 920 3.7 2369 9.7 2932 11.9 8984 36.6 6625 27.0 1323 5.4 208 0.8 167 0.8 915 3.7 81 0.3 3323 13.5 2604 10.6 157 0.6 42 0.2 42 0.2 6 0.0 12 0.0 3539 14.4 2886 11.8 339 1.4 74 0.3 83 0.3 59 0.2 42 0.2 2122 8.6 1135 4.6 827 3.4 92 0.4 62 0.3 850 3.5 27 0.1 1980 Households by Household Type and Presence of 1 or More Persons 65 Years and Older: Household Type ------------------ - - - - -- Total Households Family Household Nonfamily Household: Living Alone Other Non - Family ----------- Households---- - - - - -- Total Pct. 65+ * Pct. - - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - -- 60205 100.0 12356 20.5 40691 67.6 6802 11.3 15589 25.9 5324 8.8 3925 6.5 230 0.4 * Represents households with one or more persons 65 years Note: The percentages shown in the table on page 1 entitled "The Population 55 Years of Age and Older by Age and Sex" are based on the total population for the respective year, presented in the table at the top left of page 1. The percentages shown in the table on page 1 entitled "Households By Household Income And Age Of Householder 55 Years Of Age And Older" are based on the total households for the respective year, presented in the table at the top right of page 1. In each of the tables on pages 2 and 3, the base for each percentage in a particular table is the count appearing in the upper left of the table, which corresponds to the data universe described in the title for the particular table. 1989 estimates and 1994 projections produced by National Planning Data Corp. M-11T, Senior Life Tabulation (Added Detail) Max Area Evaluation System Study Area Summary - Edina Elder Homestead Market Area 7- FEB -90 ---------------- - - - - -- Population by Age--------------- - - - - -- Pop. By Sex 55 -59 60 -64 65 -69 - - - - - -- 70 -74 - - - -- 75 -79 - - - - - -- 80 -84 - - - - 85+ ----- 1980 - - - - -- Persons - - - - - -- 9253 - - - - - -- 7055 5295 - - 4309 3461 - -- 2503 - - - - - -- 1862 1989 Persons 9137 9276 7779 5407 3611 2401 2458 1989 Male 4314 4302 3553 2278 1352 762 609 1989 Female 4823 4974 4226 3129 2259 1639 1849 1994 Persons 9088 8731 8824 6941 4489 2606 2727 1994 Male 4271 4047 3962 3033 1752 877 685 1994 Female 4817 4684 4862 3908 2737 1729 2042 Household Income ---------- - - - - -- -Age of Householder----------- - - - - -- (In 8000's) 55 -59 60 -64 65 -69 70 -74 75 -79 - - -- 80+ ----------- - - - - -- 1980(1979) Total - - - - - -- 5450 - - - - - -- 4305 - - - - - -- 3223 - - - - - -- 2753 - - - 2368 - - - - - -- 2805 Under 87,500 217 356 441 670 894 1122 8 7,500 - 814,999 560 555 875 879 743 788 815,000 - 819,999 519 540 459 363 283 263 820,000 - 824,999 563 452 412 318 144 226 825,000 - 829,999 561 490 209 141 106 148 830,000 - 834,999 595 387 204 133 33 46 835,000 - 839,999 512 371 149 49 56 46 840,000 - 849,999 644 466 153 61 28 60 850,000 - 874,999 605 374 211 45 47 48 875,000 and over 474 314 110 94 34 58 1979 Median (8) 32563 27546 18219 13528 10427 10170 1989 Total 5531 5789 4709 3448 2479 3136 Under 87,500 106 211 311 418 473 677 8 7,500 - 814,999 176 316 480 523 550 707 815,000 - 819,999 180 267 431 400 280 338 820,000 - 824,999 174 277 425 408 289 324 825,000 - 829,999 227 324 354 291 213 202. 830,000 - 834,999 269 328 301 229 155 148 835,000 - 839,999 277 303 335 257 93 148 840,000 - 849,999 648 819 535 279 147 240 850,000 - 874,999 1562 1423 843 373 140 169 875,000 and over 1912 1521 694 270 139 183 1989 Median (8) 61340 50870 35784 24694 18666 17722 1994 Total 5663 5478 5424 4502 3158 3422 Under 87,500 74 130 252 430 446 593 8 7,500 - 814,999 121 195 378 478 531 571 815,000 - 819,999 115 160 320 390 354 379 820,000 - 824,999 137 186 366 414 298 315 825,000 - 829,999 133 197 358 412 296 299 830,000 - 834,999 165 241 313 306 238 194 835,000 - 839,999 201 246 291 255 195 144 840,000 - 849,999 452 496 600 548 207 271 850,000 - 874,999 1353 1360 1089 587 263 318 875,000 and over 2912 2267 1457 682 330 338 1994 Median (8) 79147 66324 47233 32075 24161 22667 1,31 APPENDIX 4 Senior Market Report Edina Elder Homestead Market Area . m ' wo 12I )r11 1)alIid 0661 131 I96l'Ad"J [8261 L112E N0992 ' IL021 98922 18261 MV 3W 2NSOE 09N42 NVI03M N6 ICS 99091 NV10111 IBE2 1082 HIAO ONV OS SE6 IN0 0211 83AO ONV OS 961l22 9061112 OS' 01 ON LEI) Bbl LIE OS 01 ON IBS261 SUM ON - 01 SE 609 ESL OM2 ON Ol SE EL1691 INLL91 SE 01 OE 408 8111. N42 SE1 Ol OE LSLL91 999991 uE' Of S'L2. 91L 1119 211 OE. 01 S'L2 249951 NB2ES1 S'L2) of S2 801. 699 291 S'l2) 01 S2 ELILSI 92"091 S2? 01 9'22 BOL 699 SF2 S2', 01 S'22 6S69S1 29NPI 5'22. 01 02 60L OL9 02 S'22? 01 02 1906S1 9ES2S1 02. 01 S'L► 119 26S OW 02` 01 S'LI 6111641 5402111 S'Ll' 01 SI 96S 91.9 ESE S'LI' 01 SI 9EILN1 481041 Si. 01 01 6SS 529 60L SCI! 01 01 986BE1 N82EE1 01, 01 S 51101 8SN 6001 01' 01 " SSSB21 2[20121 S NVNI SS31 SIN 69E S09 S No SS31 660211 IILIII 111101 16S 099 6N6N 111101 088891 259891 ISBU1100 5,0001 1N38 IN30 S•HH 1511111100 5,0001 30111A 3O111A 111031,11 OIDN3500H NVIM N11103M 111101 3WOJN1 010113SOOH NUIN `11110311 IN38 SSON9 AIHINOM #19 11301OHIS004 HIM SUMMON 831NIN 11V 21551 SOW LE112 [8261 L112E N0992 N113M IL021 98922 016L1 99091 2NSOE 09N42 NVI03M N6 ICS 929 02N IBE2 1082 HIAO ONV OS 68 262 IRE LIE SLB 2611 OS' 01 ON It 991 LE2 042 WS S28 ON - 01 SE S8 N12 662 NN2 OBS 4211 SE 01 OE "9 B41 C12 21.1 96E 89S uE' Of S'L2. E9 621 261 2S1 22E NL4 S'L2) of S2 86 L81 S82 SF2 694 1169 S2? 01 9'22 "I E12 LIE E12 AN SEL 5'22. 01 02 16 6LI EL2 OS2 BON B59 02. 01 S'L► Lill 161 BEE ESE S24 8Ll S'Ll' 01 SI FhF ONN EEO God 69l BbNI Si. 01 01 SLS NIN 6116 6001 9L9 5891 01, 01 S LE 102 ILS 909 112E EEb S NVNI SS31 H422 SHE ESSS 611611 91LB S99E1 111101 S431NIM SH3NN0 111101 Stl31N3H SH3NN0 111101 ISBU1100 5,0001 0 1 SL 39V 0 '. 1 99 39V 111031,11 OIDN3500H EB LCI 981 El SOlOH3500H 11V 2 06/01/20 1 318111 wl -Piro laliPM 1)af.)Il +a salrn ls1 6861 :1311005 LLS69 11190E 612!2 98241 S60E1 90401 IL011 48;9 0 0 9219 6642 4242E WIN OIE99 18662 1.6612 E9621 12511 [168 CEBOI 1895 0 0 "LEN L812 10111 N11I03W S6hl 96E 112 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 8602 83AO ONV OS E2E 442 261 S 0 U u o U 0 0 0 N9, OS) Ol ON SEI Sol BL1 6 I 0 0 0 0 u U 0 BOS 04, 01 SE LII 102 Nll 01 0 U (1 0 u 0 0 U 1'iS SC, 01 OE E4 9E1 2S1 6 1 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 I1E OE- 01 SW S4 N6 tel 8 2 0 0 0 U 0 u 0 9L2 S'12' 01 52 99 2[I 581 21 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 861 S2' Ol S'22 EB LCI 981 El 2 2 0 1 0 U U 0 924 S'22) 01 02 44 Sol SLI 61 4 9 0 0 LE2 0 1) (.1 ESE 02: 01 S'll S4 E /il 181 61 S B O p 0 n 4 0 S9E S'Ll� 01 SI 45 ELI ONE 29 22 6 S SI 0 0 0 0 089 S1, Of ul 9E 901 262 It S2 22 2 12 U 0 01 0 SBS 01.. 01 S SI IN 011 S4 U ul 0 OE 0 0 SI SI 190 S NVH1 SS31 IOS2 S02 86012 S82 59 LS L La 0 0 62 SI 6LSL 111101 HIAO 002 OSI 001 06 08 OL 09 OS ON OE 02 111101 ONV 01 of 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 KVH1 ISWIIOO 5,0001 002 OSI 001. 06 OB OL 1)9 OS ON OE 02 SS31 3903N1 (110"39111H EMISI SSISI SSW N2L61 90LS2 22811 211.11 19621 16OL1 91622 12 IE 2N 66 822 61 OE ON BL OSI 22 22 1.2 NL 56 SI S2 SN L9 26 El BI NE 2; SS El LI EF LE 2S 22 L2 611 99 It 92 2E 94 07 IL 61 12 ON 49 26 NE LN 99 EOI E01 Sb 921 21.1 991 ISI 911 681 OS2 212 202 E6 - 1121 ESI SEI 001 Beg ;It 5001 6E21 29N1 1 SO NB 08 6L -SL NL -OL 69 ;9 201 OE.. 01 9'L2 62 39V Ad SS31NIH 15'1111100 5.0001 NON 10 301tlA 459 U301OHIS11011 H11N SOlOH3500H H3NN0 WOINIMOONO3 0111V 0311I33dS 11V 926112 9002 6EEN2 6101E N262N 56012 CE902 21[12 r( 192 40ELE NV 3111 OSB22 L202 881E2 NU62 520211 SNLL1 06891 64181 M99N2 8989E W410 3w LEI 6S1 SE2 ENS LUEI 891 061 LL2 IN9 SCSI N3A0 ONtl US IL 911 Sol 661 NOE 06 9111 SMI LL2 NES OS• of ON SS 94 99 IBI BE2 LL 89 26 SW EEE ON) 01 SE 9E 69 601 6S1 L02 IS N6 NSI 922 662 SE) 01 OE OE 24 9L 121 L21 EN 09 011 ELI 201 OE.. 01 9'L2 62 NE 99 LL 911 2N IS 66 NII 091 S'L2- 01 S2 611 IN L6 NE BEI IL 89 911 002 602 S2` 01 9'22 21; L9 N6 LEI 211 BL 66 OMI S02 E12 S'221 01 02 IN E5 SB 0111 SII 09 08 EEI BLI LO2 02> 01 S'LI 211 IL BL 911 BII U BII 1141 612 122 S'LI. Ill SI 1.01 111 261 281 L91 202 192 49E LNE BIE ;Ii Ol ul 101 SNI 091 bill Ell LE2 NEE BIN IBE SIE 01 01 S OS 69 28 EL NS ENI E61 SE2 802 ;SI S NVH1 5531 008 ES01 29`11 9012 922E 92E1 89L1 LS012 12`11 8119`1 111101 I SA 49 -09 6L-SL NL OL 69-59 9 S8 018 -118 6L-SL NL It 69 59 158111100 5,0001 39V A8 S83NMO 39V AS 1VI01 3MOJN1 0108350011 S010H3S00H IT# NM 'VN103 411 M07 Atl3A11 '7 9111tlJ 1`13117 VIOU 13111011 OU3153WOH 83013 UM133 :903 S3IVVI1S3 6661 I"Od]H 13AH1111 NOIN35 - '0'11 113fOVd )ul 'PIPO 1aliPM I)aloid 0661 131 196tiAdo3 2L2S1 S2L11 W 618 ELI 02B OBL 251 ISL 8EL L6 6EL 92L 101 199 429 BL L99 929 Ell E19 OE9 EEI SL9 2E9 9E1 ELS 94S E91 ELS US 2L2 62S 8Bt Its 281 644 0S6 SI► 69E S09 at; OIS WtE )ul 'PIPa IaIiPM l)aloid AQ salaetls3 6861 :338805 Ntl3M IOLSI 80041 B969t OBIE2 SEW 6LEOl t2901 OLLB 69111 0t09 0 0 0219 6642 ES6Bl 11113111 NVI01M tl2 LBE 9SLIt LSSBI 46611 ILSB 28L6 0008 00011 ORS 0 0 9LE4 L812 LELMI NUIOiN 83A0 ON11 05 96E112 19OE02 L6 19 11P2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 281 83AO GNU 05 OS" 01 04 69EIB1 BOS6L1 EL 09 19 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 561 OS) 01 Ot Ot) 01 SE 999191 IIt4Sl t2 EE at E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 801 Ot) 01 SE SE` Ol OE 656091 ECEESI 22 62 St E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 SEI 01 OE OE, 01 SW OsBttl SBS9E1 9 LI Ot t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L9 OE) 01 SW S'L2) 01 92 0619tl BEVE1 t 11 W 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2t S'L2) 01 S2 S2', 01 S'22 666541 6PLEl S Ll SE E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 09 S2) 01 S'22 S'22) 01 02 689051 6060tl L LI 2E 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OS S'22) 01 02 02, at S'LI OL9041 201111 9 S2 LS S 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 L6 02p 01 S'LI S'LI, 01 SI L6S01iI OOOSEI 91 Lt 66 6 t S 0 0 (1 0 t 0 481 S'GI) at SI 51:. 01 01 89EIE1 SEIL21 91 to 861 2t 91 O t 21 0 0 0 0 OBE SI) at 01 01) 01 S S;St21 621121 22 9L 9E2 29 22 61 2 02 0 0 01 0 ILt 01) Ol S S NUNI 5531 OBLIII 600111 SI Ot Bill 5t 0 01 0 OE 0 0 SI SI OL2 S WHI SS31 111101 SOE241 2019E1 EIE LIS 0101 181 tt tt 9 29 0 0 62 S1 1222 111101 1N3N IN30 S.1111 ISH91100 5.0001 30111A 3010 W311 Ntl103M 111101 3M03N1 OlOH3500" 1111311 Ntl103M IN3H SS089 AM NON #59 83010HH HIIN S.HH 831N31 NOSH3d 3110 1111 91921 IOLSI 80041 21251 01061 OL891 Ntl3M 2456 49811 90401 9201 2E6tl 891E1 NVI03M St 29 L6 ELI tl2 LBE 33AO ON11 OS 9S 18 LEI 291 L22 6LE OS) Ol Ot 2E 24 tl L6 L21 t22 041 01 SE OE EE E9 101 LII 812 SE) Ol OE 62 2E 19 BL 6L LSI OE) 01 S'L2 9E E2 6S EB ES 9E1 S'L2) 01 S2 95 4E 06 Ell El 902 S2' 01 5'22 LS 62 9B 9E1 El 602 5'22) OI 02 2S OE 28 E91 SII BL2 02. 01 S'LI III t8 S61 2L2 S12 Lot S'LI) at 91 L62 Et2 OtS It; Itt 206 SI` 01 01 t2S ►OE 828 OS6 09 0611 01) 01 S ISLE L61 L9S 909 22E L26 S NVHI 5531 5691 tall 6L82 184E 9652 0809 111101 SHIIN38 S831NO 111101 S831N38 S83NNO 111101 1511111100 5,0001 : 1 SL 3911 ( 1 S9 3911 3MO3NI OlOH3500H S010113500H NOS43d 3110 1111 06101,20 2 118111 83A0 002 051 001 06 08 OL 09 OS at OE 02 111101 ON11 01 01 01 Ol 01 01 01 Ol 01 01 WHl (SW1100 S.0001 002 OSI 001 O6 08 OL 09 OS Ot OE 02 SS31 3M03NI 010113500H 9tE21 42921 2OL21 9EB9l 25881 0426 106 S9L6 tE121 20191 01 SI 02 It LB SI 12 02 tE 29 6 El 01 62 9E t S 12 OE It 9 6 tl 22 L2 L 01 61 02 L2 11 81 L2 SE 24 tl 81 52 Ot 6E 6 41 62 It OL 92 tE IS 08 18 It S6 IEI L21 LII 421 991 412 422 202 E6 121 ESI SEI 001 66E 245 4SL BSA IE6 l 9 SB 48 -08 6L -SL tl-OL 69-r.9 3911 A8 S031N14 ISHtl1100 S.000) 3NOH 10 381tlA #S9 83010H3500H HIM SO10113SOOH H3NNO MOININOONOJ ON11 0313133dS NOS83d 3110 1111 SISSI It6Sl 61951 LOW SM2 IL211 99911 11221 9t6S1 61102 21 11 E2 ES 601 22 OE 62 at 96 21 81 21 Ot St E 9 t2 9E at 9 01 91 82 61 S L 11 It 61 8 01 91 61 02 9 01 El W 02 S L BI OE SS LI t2 Et S9 99 BS LL 801 E01 S6 EL L6 KI 621 L01 OS 99 18 2L ES LL2 RE 92S BS9 tSL 4 SB 48-08 6L -SL tL -OL 69-59 1911 A8 58311;0 AN1111,103 A43AU '3 911183 :1113113 L99E1 OEM S80tl 9t►LI L9112 4266 20201 21801 58241 916L1 22 2E Et 46 961 LE IS 64 20 091 12 IE 22 69 19 L it St 99 68 21 61 OE OS 94 21 LI OE IE 94 61 82 Et Ms 29 02 02 BE t9 6% tl 12 Lt It S21 Et 05 ►6 Stl Ltl 621 20 6E2 OE2 212 L61 E92 09E ESE 601 E41 061 tE2 L02 ESI 9L9 126 2821 91S1 S891 111111311 W 103M 83AO ON OS OS) at 0► Ot) 01 SE SE) 01 OE OE) 01 SW S'121 01 S2 52) 01 S122 S'22) Ol 02 OZ) 01 S'LI S'LD 01 SI SI) OI 01 01) 01 S S NVHI SS31 111101 : 1 98 W -08 61-SL tL-01 69 -S9 ISWIIOO 5.0001 3911 AB 111101 31103111 010113SOON SO10113500H NOSH3d 3N0 1H1 NN 'UNIO3 113811 13'MUM Otl31S3MOH 83013 VN103 :BB3 SIIVVI1S3 6861 1HOd3H 1396UN MOMS - '0'11 DRUM )01 'PIPO M JFM I M 01d 0661 13) 1v611Ad03 'Jul 4111-0 MOM 11a1013 /,0 sale911s3 6861 338005 84641 "Ulu 686E4 0622 84691 MOM 16501 6641 0 8409 0 0 0219 6642 LESS N11311 LSOII NV103M 0006E 00061 E28B1 2448 E2S6 2L2L 0 BEM 0 !, SLE4 L912 68E41 KNOW LLB 68L 16 03AD ONV OS L94E22 EE8012 6S III U 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 HAD ONU 09 408 OLL BEI OS` Ol ()4 829081 0006L1 09 64 BS 1 U 0 t1 0 0 1) 0 1) 90 OS) al 04 4EL OEL L8 W 01 SE 405191 EEEESI 42 62 L4 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EOI Ohi 01 SE IEL 22L S6 SE` 01 (1E 140191 .811Sf 22 L2 44 E 0 U O U U U U U 96 SE` 01 OE SS9 L19 SL OE) al S'L2 OSB441 WWI 9 LI O4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L9 OE. 01 ;'L2 SS9 819 SL S'L2'. 01 S2 LB4S41 899E1 4 01 S2 2 11 0 0 1) 0 U U 0 It S'L2: 01 S2 ES9 L19 211 S2) 01 S'22 128441 4ILSE1 S 41 4E E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9S S2i Ol 5'22 ES9 L19 211 S'22) 01 02 418641 2906E1 L 41 IE 2 0 U 0 t) 0 t1 U U 4S S'22) 01 02 M E4S LEI 02) 01 S'LI 9016E1 2412EI S 61 SS S 2 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 98 02'. 01 S'LI E99 14S 422 S'LI'. 01 SI 016BE1 9442E1 41 2E 46 6 4 0 (1 0 0 4 0 LSI S'll) 01 SI E25 9B4 4E4 Sl 01 01 520621 498421 21 OS 981 BE 21 0 0 21 1) 0 0 0 OIE Si" 01 01 IB4 ES% OSB 01) 01 S 6EBE21 689021 02 09 4E2 09 02 01 0 Oi i 1) 01 1) 4E4 01) 01 S 114 69E SK S NVHI 5531 Mill IIIIII Sl OE 001 S4 0 0 0 OE 0 0 SI SI BS2 S NVH1 5531 LES 20S SL62 111101 42L6E1 LbL2EI 192 69E IL6 SLI BE 01 U 29 0 1) 62 Sl 9E61 1V101 1438 1N38 S,"N 1S0111100 5.0001 30111A 30111A 03AD 002 OSI 001 06 OB 11L 09 Or 04 OE 02 1V101 NV3M NV103M 111101 31103111 010H3500H 03M W103M UNU Ol 01 01 01 Ol 01 01 01 Ol 01 NVHI (s11111100 5.0001 002 OSI 001 06 09 OL 09 09 O4 OE 02 5531 3110]41 010113500" IN38 SSO89 AININOM 150111100 S.000) ]MOM 30 301VA #99 8301UHN HIIN S•HH 831NIN 31VU33 N0503d ]NO #99 43010143500H HIIN SUMMON 83NN0 MOININOONO3 ONV 0313133JS 31111133 NOSB3d 3NO 60521 99951 61BEI 84641 61981 61591 NV311 0421 24921 19921 644SI 9LEB1 011951 OL091 10SI E96B1 281E2 ISM 9L6E1 L9611 000 2SE02 N113M 2926 59911 6566 LSOII ESS41 S4921 NV103M 6006 L216 2546 L0021 S48S1 L9601 48411 01611 69951 E8161 4E96 2586 bOEOi 06LE1 BUL) N11107M 42 12 IS 16 601 002 HAD ONV US S B 11 12 94 9 6 21 L2 SS II LI E2 84 101 43AO OW 0S 4S 9L OEl BEI E02 14E OS, Ol 04 SI 12 BI OE 4S 12 62 92 E4 4B 9E OS 4h EL BEI OS` OI 04 62 O4 69 LB 611 902 04: 01 SE 8 21 6 S2 EE 21 Ll 11 9E E4 02 62 112 19 9L 00 01 SE 62 2E 19 S6 211 L02 SE- 01 of 4 S 02 82 BE E 9 E2 SE S4 L 11 Ea E9 E8 SE- 01 OE 62 2E 19 SL BL ESI OE' 01 S'L2 9 6 4I 12 S2 9 of 91 L2 61 21 61 OE B4 4h OE) 01 S'L2 EE E2 9S SL OS 921 S'L2) 01 92 L 01 91 LI S2 S L 11 01 LI 21 LI L2 L2 24 S'L2) 01 S2 L4 IE BL 211 l9 60 S2 01 5'22 UI SI 22 OE SE L 01 4I al 81 LI S2 9E B4 ES S2) at S'22 L4 82 SL 211 99 BLI S'22> 01 02 11 SI 12 EE 2E 9 01 21 02 BI LI 92 EE ES 0S S'22: 01 02 L4 82 IL LEf 201 6E2 02' al S'LI 8 11 42 SE 69 S L 91 92 84 El BI 04 IV L01 02) 01 S'LI 16 IL 291 422 281 904 S'LI 01 SI 12 82 24 99 L9 ;1 12 SE ;S 9S 9E 64 LL 121 E21 S'LI> 01 SI 812 L61 SE4 4E4 LSE 16L Sf) 0) UI 9S LL S01 201 46 94 E9 8B EB LL 201 041 ELI 901 ILI SI) 01 01 1.94 BL2 94L OSB 464 "El 01. 01 S 011 841 602 01)2 EBI L9 68 221 LII 66 LLI LE2 IEE LIE 282 01', 01 S 211' 201 415 S4S 862 E48 S NUHI 5531 EB 211 LEI 221 16 94 29 4L L9 64 621 4L1 112 681 1141 S NVHI ss31 [941 5401 8052 9L62 LE22 2125 10101 44E 10 849 OEL 2BL 542 114E 094 49S 829 68S IIB 8011 4621 0141 I11101 SBIIN30 503N110 IVI01 5431N38 SOUND ]Viol ISBU1100 5.01101 ' 4 SB 48-00 6L -SL 4L 0L 69 59 9 S0 48 -08 6L-SL 4L -0L 69-;9 4 SB 48 OB 6L SL 41 OL 69 S9 IS0V1100 S.000) SL 390 1 4 S9 39V 31103111 O1OH3500H 39V A0 5831NIN 39V AS SH3NN0 39V AS IV)01 3M03NI 01083500" SOlOH3500H 31V1133 NOSB3d ]NO SUMMON 31UN31 NOS03d 340 NM VN10l 116:01/2(1 ANV•11103 AUAV '3 91V03 :IN1117 V3BV IIANVM OVIIS3900 03013 UN103 :803 S3IVWII53 6861 E 314V1 18Dd30 IIAOV11 8011135 - '0'11 133[00d 1ul 'PIPO 1al)PM Imfaid UA61 131 14610do3 'jul 'PIPO 1almll 13001d AQ salPslls3 6861 :33HH05 F' 61291 N113M 14E421 ES412 L9802 69111 69111 4516 69111 0 0 0 0 0 45202 1111311 ISM MU103M 6908 LBILI 0S291 00011 00011 OUSE 00011 0 0 0 1) U L0991 HIM 0201 L16 2B 03A0 ONtl 05 111161 606061 BE E4 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 03A0 01111 OS 666 IBB 41 OS'• Ol U4 E92081 9916L1 S 11 E 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 OS) 01 94 L06 919 OI 04: 01 SE ISISLI OOOOLI 0 h 1 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 S 04: 01 SE 008 16L 9 SE) Ol OE LE4SL1 999991 0 2 1 U 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 E SEi 01 OE 02B LIB E OE) Ol S'L2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OE) 01 S'L2 691 OIL B 5'(.2) 01 S2 OOOOLI OOOSLI U 1 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 U 0 0 1 S'L2) 01 92 EOL hOl 12 92) 01 1.'22 009291 005291 O E 1 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 h S2; 01 S'22 EBL 40L 42 9'22` 01 02 005291 O0S291 0 E 1 0 0 U 0 1) 1) 0 0 n h S'22) 01 02 619 US 92 02' 01 1.'LI 1.42LL1 ;82491 I 9 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 021- 01 S'LI 524 085 8h S'L1- 01 ;1 2900 UU5291 2 51 S 0 5 U !1 U 0 0 O L2 S'Gli 01 SI BS1. 005 L01 SI 01 UI IUBL91 1.82 "51 4 4E 21 h h B h ii d 6 U U UL 51. 01 VI 964 224 001 01' 01 S 64SL41 000041 2 91 h 2 2 6 2 ! 0 P LE 01� 01 954 ELE 09 S WHI 5531 000521 0606L 0 01 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 S WHI 5531 E19 BSS 60S 111101 L09LL1 951891 2S 841 6E 9 9 4E 9 0 0 0 0 0 162 111101 IN38 IN38 S.NH ISH111100 5.0001 3B1tlA 301VA 03AO 002 OSI 001 06 08 OL 1.9 OS 04 OE 02 111101 WIN NVI03M 111101 3WOINI 010113S00H WIN 111110311 01111 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 Ntl111 1511111100 5.0001 002 OSI 001 1)6 OB OL 09 OS 04 OE 02 S531 31103111 O1DHISMOH IN1N SSO89 AIHINOW ISIVI100 5.0001 3MOH i0 30111A #99 H3010M HIM S.HH 83111311 311111 NOS03d IN0 #S9 43010113511011 HIM 501011350014 43NNO 111111111,1001103 ONtl 0313133dS 31VU NOS113d 3N0 L1821 01441 214E1 61291 EEL02 106LI WIN LOSII 62021 SLLEI E64L1 ELL12 96621 L09E1 19951 96602 01495 86021 W21 56E41 26LBI 6CE82 WIN 64L11 BL621 IIE21 ISM BE891 96E51 NVI03H LE601 SIEII 22221 EEESI SLE61 LOE21 EEE21 ILSEI 2L2L1 EEEE► L0911 69611 2LB21 00291 OSLE2 W103H 12 S2 94 28 S01 LBI 83AO ONtl OS S L 6 02 14 9 B 11 92 45 11 SI O2 94 S6 113AO ON11 OS 2 S L 41 42 BE O5) 01 04 0 0 2 4 8 1 1 E S 4I I I S 6 22 OS) 01 0► E 2 S 01 B 81 04) Ol SE I I I 4 E 0 1 1 4 2 1 2 2 8 S 0►) 01 SE 1 1 2 9 S 11 SE} 01 OE 0 0 1 2 E 0 0 1 1 E 0 0 2 E 9 SE) Ol OE 1) 0 U E I 4 OE> 01 S'L2 U 0 0 1 2 0 I) 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 OE) 01 9'L2 E 0' E B E 11 S'L2) 01 S2 0 0 E E 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 E 4 4 S'L2) 01 S2 6 E 2l 12 9 L2 92) 01 9'22 1 E S 1. L 1 U 2 1 2 2 E L 9 6 S2) 01 S'22 01 1 it 42 L IE S'22'1 01 02 E E 4 L L 0 0 1 4 2 E E S II 6 5'22) Ol 02 6 2 11 92 El 6E 02'• 01 1.'LI I E S 9 11 0 0 2 4 L 1 E L 01 BI 02) 01 S'LI 02 El EE 84 EE IB S'LI) Ol 51 5 9 6 hl 41 2 E 8 01 01 L 6 LI 42 42 S'Gli 01 SI 6; 94 SOI LOI 48 161 S1l 01 01 SI BI 92 S2 E2 21 hl 02 02 81 L2 2E 94 94 14 S1. 01 01 LS 92 EB 001 94 941 01) 01 S 4l 81 S2 ►2 61 9 B 21 21 B 02 92 LE 9E L2 01) 01 S 81 SI ES 09 42 4B S WHI SS31 01 21 91 El 6 4 4 L 5 4 ►I 91 E2 BI El S WWI SS31 2E2 6E1 ILE 605 6SE 898 111101 S5 IL 901 921 641 2E 6E 99 46 921 LB 011 40 222 SL2 111101 SNIIN34 SHINN0 111101 SHIIN3H 583NMO 111101 15"111100 5.000) 9 SO 48-08 6L -SL 4L-OL 69 -59 c 9 SO 48-08 6L -SL 4L -OL 69 -59 < I SB 48-08 6L -SL 4L-OL 69 -59 1511101100 5.0001 9 SL 3911 l 7 S9 3911 31103111 010113S00H 3911 A8 SHIM 3911 AB 58311"0 3911 A9 111101 31101111 003"M SOlOH35BOH 31tlM NOSH3d IWO SO10HIS11011 31VW N05113d 3110 1111 '1111103 06/01120 ANHI103 A#3AV '3 911147 :1113113 U3811 13AHVW 0tl31S3MOH #3013 VN103 :1101 53111111153 6861 h 318111 180d38 IMMM #OIN35 - '0'11 133103d ''ol 'PIPO Ia11PM I3arold 1)661 Ill 1g6l1AduJ '11)1 'Plea lalj•M I13(oid Aq saIM IS3 6861 :33111105 lodl0400E NVIN 61BEL LE02E 2SS92 OL902 EL291 LSOLI OOS21 OSZEI 0 0 0 0 B6Elh 11113M L56L2 NV10311 62LIL E8962 L16h2 ECE61 US291 0;291 OYS21 OWI1 1) 0 0 0 16100 NV1039 826 SEB 6E2 HIAU GNU 05 BE4922 90EL12 86E1 6S2 L91 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L201 HIA0 GNU OS 548 218 091 OS 01 Oh S6902 202L61 OS? 01 01 r 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 i1 hls OS, 01 114 E48 BSL 121 04. 01 SE 2MEL1 IBIELI III 011 Ell r 1 0 U O U 0 0 0 6EE Or- 01 SE 6EB SSL E01 SE'• 01 OE WEL1 MEL1 56 E6 96 E 0 0 U g 0 0 0 0 L82 SEA 01 Of BSL 02L OL OE' 01 9'L2 2E96S1 522451 LE OL 16 S 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 402 OE 01 S'L2 BSL 22L B9 S'L2:• 01 52 L016S1 9r2ES1 Ih LL 001 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 922 S'L2i 01 S2 49L 02L 201 52> 01 9'22 6S06SI 110191 19 S11 051 6 E 0 0 0 q 0 0 0 BEE. S2` 01 S'22 rSl 02L 1)11 S'22" 01 02 LSE091 OOOSSI 9L 021 951 11 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 A9C 5'22 Ol 02 989 LL9 L8 02� 01 S'll 55L2S1 9EEShl BE 08 BII hl 2 h 0 0 0 0 0 U 9S2 02> 01 S'LI S89 9L9 08 S'Ll:- Ol Sl ROW 69SShl 62 OS 6L 6 1 E 0 A .1 0 0 0 ILI S'L1i 01 51 9S9 599 h;l SI. 01 01 24%941 109041 BE LL EEI 61 9 1 1 E U 0 0 0 Bl2 St., 01 01 819 019 6S 01! 01 S L00S41 2L2LE1 41 OE 4S 6 E E 0 1 0 0 1! U 411 011 01 S 0 0 0 S NVHI 5531 9991%1 9991x1 0 1 2 0 11 0 0 i1 0 0 0 9 E S NVHI S531 569 009 0EI 111101 958961 E89881 9912 5221 9LE1 96 12 El 1 5 0 0 0 0 5264 111101 IN30 IN3" SINN 15HVI100 5,0001 3111VA 3111VA 83AO 002 OSI 001 06 08 I'L 09 OS Oh OE 02 1VIOl Ntl3M NV10311 111101 3403111 010143511014 1110311 111110311 GNU 01 01 111 01 111 111 01 01 01 01 NVHI IS"V1100 5.0001 002 091 001 06 08 OL 09 OS Oh OE 02 SS31 3M03N1 OlOB3511OH IN38 550"9 AIHINOM 15"111100 5.0001 3NOH 30 311111A #59 H301OHN HIM S,NH 811N34 31003 03188VV 49 03010113511UH HIIN SO1OH3SBOH 43NMO 1111111111001103 GNU 0313133dS 31d1103 0318WN BIM 81862 90082 OWE LO M S898E Ntl3M 2BOE2 6BE22 02942 0060E IE58E MOE L280E 20062 IL96E. 090ES SLO82 4EW 611W E86LE 20E64 NV30 6L612 224L2 46892 LSW BE6LE L99SE NV103M OEL12 EEE02 29IC2 25482 6L69E B96L2 16EL2 222L2 09E9E E9209 26852 98052 9L192 1984E E9894 11"10311 64 094 605 6E2 5902 W2 HIA0 01111 OS 11 91 22 5'; SEI 121 9E1 E02 69h 9111 2EI 2S1 S22 425 IL21 "3A0 ONV OS 62 061 612 OSI 495 hEL OS'• 01 04 h L BI I4 08 44 BL 89 LEI LS2 B4 S8 98 BLI LEE OS'• 01 04 4E III 541 121 LOE BOS Oh, 01 SE 21 L SI 0 Lh Oh E2 8h W1 291 25 OE E9 491 661 Oh? 01 SE 4h 241 981 EOI 82E ID SE• 01 OE 01 BI 91 S2 hE 62 9S LS 28 401 6E 4L EL L01 BEI SE' 01 OE 22 SL L6 OL 902 90E OE, 01 5'L2 h 5 EI 02 82 51 61 Ih 29 66 61 42 r5 28 L21 OE Ol S'L2 92 96 221 89 BS2 92E 5'L21 01 52 9 9 hl LI 52 12 22 ES 59 L6 L2 82 L9 28 221 S'L2> 01 92 2h ESI 961 201 981 80 S2` UI 5'22 If 6 22 IE 62 IM IE IB 911 BII 25 Oh E01 941 01 S2i 01 S'22 Lh 481 IE2 1.01 61h 929 5'22'• 01 02 21 hl 12 B2 2E 9h L5 18 Ell 221 BS IL 201 141 11;1 5'22:, 01 02 24 MI 161 LB E62 OBE 1)2' Ol S'Ll Of El 61 E2 22 9E 94 L9 h8 09 9r 6S 9B LUI 20 02? 01 S'LI SE EOI BEI OB L61 LL2 S'L1, Ol 51 B El 41 E2 22 S2 94 2E Gh Lt EE 6S 94 OL 69 S'LI 01 SI 89 281 OL2 4S1 12E SLh SI, 01 01 22 82 BE rE 2E 9r 6S LL 2L L9 89 LB Sit 901 66 S1:• 01 01 IS 011 191 6% 9E1 961 Oli 01 S 21 E2 91 B 0 82 04 4E 92 9 04 IL 0S 82 9 01, 01 S O 4 4 U 9 9 S NVBI 5531 0 U U 0 0 O E I I 1 0 E I I I S WHI SS31 605 6S61 8942 OW 9195 9569 1VIOI 221 651 922 54E 9Bh 264 429 E4 1601 9922 419 Eft IL01 9EL1 2SL2 111101 5331M3" S4311110 111101 S831M38 S83MOO IVIOI ISHV11O0 5,0001 ' 9 SB 4B OB 6L -SL 4L•UL 69 S9 9 SB x8-08 6L-9L hL-OI 69 S9 9 SO h8 08 6L -SL hL -OL 69 S9 IS"V1100 5.0001 9 SL 39V 7 59 i9V IN03N1 010H35110H 39V AB S831438 3911 AB S41NMO 39V AB 1VIU1 31103111 OlOH35110B 5018" 11UH 31003 03138VM (A1N0 31103111 31d11O3 0319HUNI SO1OH35110H 31 ,11103 0314SVM NM 'UN103 n6101120 MUM) ) MAU 'J 9111"3 :1NII1J V3dV 1348VU MIS3110H 83013 VN103 :803 S31VN1153 6861 5 3111111 1110,138 1340VU 8011135 - '0'11 133f0 "d ')111 'P1PU IaInM I)aro d o661 (1) 19611Adoi S40SE 0 0 ' 0 0 402EE Ntl3N 0 OBSK Ntl3N 0 2E2SE Z89ZL MV103N 0 0 0 B96 ILB B 83A0 ONV OS 102EL1 WOO 111110311 246 08 SI OS: 01 O► BLIILI 999991 (1 BBB 66L 2Z 01:1 01 SE 559691 (56E91 HIAO ON10 OS 088 I6L 0 SEA 01 OE E81691 OBA91 O LLL LOL 42 OE? 01 S'L2 001891 000491 OS) 01 04 LLL OEL I S'LZ) 01 92 680991 582191 0 0 0 0 S2) 01 S'22 0 0 01% 01 SE 0 O O S'22. Ol 02 0 U u 0 0 0 W 01 S'Ll 0 0 SE) 01 OE BL9 095 I S'L1:1 01 SI LS4291 241LSI 0 2S9 ISS 41 SI, 01 01 018951 94ESl OE, 01 S' L2 0 0 U W 01 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 S NVHI 5531 0 0 S'L2', 01 S2 LOL SO S21 1V101 EbEUL1 IBES91 0 1N38 IN30 S•HH ISHU1100 S,000) Pin 30110A S2- 01 S'22 Ntl3N NV103N 111101 3NO3N1 01OUS11011 NVIN NV103N ININ SAM AIHINOM oS9 830101f3500H HIM S010113S00H 831N30 1131110 6410E 0002E OL21E WEE KW ECIK NV3N 66162 SLUE 2800E 0892E I I W KOK NV103M . 0 61 61 8 201 011 83AO ONU OS / IZ S2 SI h9 6L W. 01 91 S EI 81 22 IL Eb 94= 01 SE II 6E OS 04 SEI SLI SE' 01 OE 41 1/ SS 42 18 S01 OE) 01'S W 1 01 II 1 II 21 SW) 01 S2 0 0 0 u 0 0 S2, 01 S'ZZ 0 0 0 0 0 0 5'22 01 02 0 0 0 0 0 0 02' 01 S'LI I / S 1 EI ►I S'LI'• O1 SI 8 SI E2 1I L2 Ih SI'l 01 01 0 0 0 0. 0 0 OUOIS 0 0 0 0 0 0 S NVHI 5531 44 291 902 521 405 629 IVI01 SI)IN18 58111110 10101 58311118 SHINMO 1V101 (SNV1100 5,0001 ':L 19V : i 59 39V )NO1N1 010H3500H SOlOH3500H 81H10 06/01120 9 318111 )UI 1PIPd jai MM I)afl)ld ea SaIn1 1%] 6861 13]8005 0 21LSE WEE S40SE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OBSK Ntl3N 0 2E2SE BBOEE ;OOZE 0 0 0 r) O 0 0 0 ESK 111110311 0 9L El 0 0 0 (1 0 0 0 0 0 68 HIAO ON10 OS O 14 41 0 O O O 0 0 u 0 11 SS OS) 01 04 0 24 LI 2 O 9 0 0 0 0 u 0 19 01% 01 SE 0 III EE h 0 0 u O 0 O 0 O 811 SE) 01 OE O 64 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OL OE, 01 S' L2 0 9 2 i1 u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B S'L2', 01 S2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S2- 01 S'22 O O 0 0 O O u 0 0 O 0 0 O VW Ol OZ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02'. 01 S' L 0 9 E 1 O 0 0 1) u 0 O O 01 S'll) 01 SI 0 21 6 1 0 0 0 0 O l 0 0 22 SI) 01 01 O 0 u O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 01) Ol S 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S ""I SS31 0 CIE 211 B U 1) 0 u 0 11 U 0 ED 110101 HIM 002 0S1 001 06 OB OL (19 OS 04 OE 02 110101 ONtl 01 01 01 Ol 01 01 01 01 O1 01 NVH1 1511101100 5.0001 002 OSI 001 06 OB OL 09 u5 0 OE 02 SS31 31103N1 610113SOOH 6KOE 96162 60862 9181E 2WE S2182 00062 LOW BESIE E919E 0 O 0 2 9 0 2 2 E B I 2 2 S ZI 1 Z B 21 LI E 4 L 01 0 0 1 0 0 0 u 11 0 1) 1) 0 0 0 u 0 u 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 E E 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L hl E2 9E Sh S SO 48-08 6L -;L hL OL 5 6 9E 190 IB 5113111]10 4SIVII00 5.000) WON 10 301VA •99 03010H3S00H HIIN S010HISRON 03NN0 NBINIM001103 ONV 0313133dS 93HIO LELIE L602E 9L61E. MEE 0698E 90SOE S060E 9081E 26L2E SL20E 11103N O%162 S290E ISSIE 9Lb2E 20BE 51962 19862 ISSIE 5892E 296LE 111010311 h 9 6 12 29 h 9 6 E2 89 HIM ON10 OS S B B 11 62 S 01 01 LI LE OS) 01 01 E S S LI Ih 4 L L 22 ES OV 01 SE 4 L 82 11 SS 5 6 9E ES 2L SE:1 01 OE 5 EI 61 IE 6 21 LI 92 Ih 6 OE, 01 SW E S 2 1 0 E 9 2 1 0 S112'. 01 S2 u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52'1 01 S' 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 S' 22) 01 02 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 02) 01 S'LI 0 1 E 1 S 0 1 b 1 S S'L1) 01 SI E S L L S S 8 01 11 L Si. 01 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 01. 019 0\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 i1 0 0 S 1110111 SS31 IE OS III 9E1 902 BE h9 h01 2L1 IS2 111101 7 SO W08 6L SL 4l UL 69 S4 1 S8 4B 08 6L -SL 4L 0L 69 59 15801100 5.0901 19V ).8 SHINN0 39V 111 111111 31107111 OIUH3S00H SOlON3500H 831110 IIN 'UN103 ANVdM03 A63AU '3 91UH3 :IN3113 V3H10 1310VM 010315311011 83013 VNI03 :803 SIIVMIIS3 6861 Id0.138 1330UN QIN35 - '0'11 l33EO8d )ul 'FIFO IalieN 3 )af01d 0661 111 IgbIIAda3 LIOB L69S 9SLL 4E19 OOEC 60S 0. 0 0 S 2 L 41 1 SI 9 0 9 8 0 B EE 0 CE E9 E 99 E61 21 S02 K2 64 E82 9SS L9 E29 S03010 35nOdS 110101 ( t SL 399 28801 1901 LIL6 E061 WE OIC9 0 0 0 22 12 E4 2E S LE EE 0 EE BM 0 BM 68 S 46 E21 SE BSI 6S2 89 UE EOE 592 09; 606 ME BOEI 503H10 3SnOdS 110101 ( 1 S9 39tl Ntl3N 2516 926L 6EC5 9SE21 02011 Ntl103N MS 2E99 4684 88211 21441 43A0 ONtl US 0 0 0 0 0 OS: Ol 04 S 0 0 0 LI OM'• 01 OE 41 0 0 0 at OE) 01 S2 S 1 0 6 BI S2) 01 02 0 8 0 12 61 02' 111 SI 01 61 4 02 9E SI) 01 01 12 SE L 12 6E 01) 01 S 2L 99 SS 82 BE S NtlNI 5531 16 9L L9 IE BE 110101 812 902 EEI OEI C22 IS8tl1100 S•000) ( 1 SB 48-08 6L -SL 4L -OL 69 -S9 31103111 01083SnOH 39tl AS S03HIC 1696 S99E2 EIBMI IM OW62 94161 Ntl3N 88802 92801 666L 6L98 S806 M2L9 ESIE2 26801 6919 0262 L0161 Ntl103N 2165 0099 44E9 h949 h2L9 11 0 II II 2 El 8360 ONtl OS S 4 2 0 0 S B El L S01 211 OS) Ol OM E 0 2 1 1 2 2E 4E 9 2S1 BSI OM) 01 OE 2 0 n 2 2 4 OM MM II 191 211 OE) 01 S2 2 I 1 2 S 8 109 2L BI 021 BEI 52) 01 02 0 9 2 M 9 82 4E 29 9h LE E8 02N 01 SI 0 8 02 8 01 ;4 01 SS 69 L2 96 91:• 01 01 0 41 IE 21 21 S11 81 EEI 461 92 612 01) 01 S II IE EL 4E S4 BEI 0 BEI E22 0 E22 S NBHI 5531 91 LE SO 6E 94 95C 902 29S SBS 629 h121 110101 6E 101 912 201 L21 SH1N10 SHO1NH 110101 Stl3H10 SHO1HH 111101 1510101100 51nOn) i 7 SB WOO 6L-9L 4L -OL 69 -S9 1 SL 39tl ( 1 S9 39tl NOW OIGH35RON 39tl Ad S83H10 06ro1)20 L 318101 )ul 'ele0 lalieN ))alo)d Aq saleeils3 6861 :3381105 521E ILSE 9999 8221 BE4L 4126 61 BL 92K SSa6 OK21 1110311 OOS2 9162 LEIIE 02LE S20E E109 IG99 4bh4 9229 8608 111010311 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8360 ONtl OS 0 0 2 9 El S 0 2 9 OE (& Ol 04 0 0 1 4 0 hl 0 1 4 BI 00 01 OE 0 0 0 0 0 S 1 0 6 BI OE) at S 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 12 61 S2) Ol 02 O O 0 1 h 01 bl 4 12 04 02) 01 SI 0 0 E 6 E2 12 SE 01 OE 29 SD O1 01 I E B M2 2E EL 69 E9 2S OL 01) at S L 11 IE SO IEI 86 LB 86 911 691 S "Ill S531 B 41 S4 621 E02 922 612 BLI 6S2 924 11101 < 7 SB 48 -OB 6L -SL hL-01, 69 -S9 ( 1 SO 48-08 bl-SL 4L -OL 69 -59 (58101100 5.000) iS9 39tl SI 83010H3SnOH 39tl AS 8301OHMOH 30 35nOd5 39tl AS 81101 31103111 OlOH3SMH 99 39tl NUHI 5531 SI SUMMON 3831111 S010B35nOH Ni 9111611 SNOStl3d hEW 10142 2E622 EWOE SISEE 4M002 S4SS1 48621 ESI22 LEES2 Ntl3N USE2 OS2E2 L2L22 99982 UWE 410)2 22221 9156 6EW 54661 111010311 0 0 0 2 0 S 4 2 2 0 HAS ONtl OS E E 2 92 It 9 E h L2 2L OS) 01 04 9 21 41 0 EL 8 21 41 64 SL OM) 01 OE L 11 22 44 LL- 6 21 E2 94 28 OE) 01 S2 El 61 2E BE 01 El S2 4E 2M 42 S2� 01 02 h Ol 02 2 1 4 81 04 01 11 02. 01 SI 2 E S 6 8 2 LI 9E 12 02 Sl) Ol 01 E 9 6 4 E 41 LE 28 BE 84 01) Ol S 0 0 0 0 0 91 LE SB bE 94 S WHI SS31 BE 49 401 211 IS2 LL 591 02E 412 OLE 110101 9 SB 48 08 6L SL hL OL 69 S9 ( 9 S8 48-08 6L-SL 4L -0L 69 -59 IStltlll00 S•0001 39tl Ad S83010113SOOH 39tl AS 110101 31103111 010)13SOON iS9 39tl SI 83010H3SnOH 383HO SOlOH39011 HIH10 NI 9NIA11 SNOSH3d NN vNIOl ANtldNO] AN3Atl '3 911083 :1113113 1031V 1318VN OV3153HON 03013 VN103 :803 SlItlN1153 6861 l80d3d 13181011 HOIN3S - '0'N 173EOdd 'ul 'FIFO IaIIIPN Itafatd 0661 IJI 196to da3 21551 IL221 516 148 h6 LES 86L 68 609 ESL It 400 84L SB 91L hl9 S9 got 699 E9 BOL 699 06 60L OL9 401 119 26; 46 865 9LS L41 KS 52S E6E 684 8Sa SLS 514 69E OLE ;BS LSS 8422 ]III pipe Ia11eN Ildfat,l AQ salretls3 6861 338005 Will IV S85h2 LEI 12 SOM BMe 'IL002 99h11 BSLOI E59B EE801 IL6S 0 0 EGOS OnS2 SEBQ NV39 NU103N IBE2 1082 265L4 69942 E2281 2h96 9996 269L EEB01 9E0 0 0 OUSE 0002 S6022 N11103N HAD GNU OS 928422 ELES12 4EE S8 4h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E91I 03AD ONU OS OS) 01 04 L88261 521881 L01 61 E9 1 A 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 OS2 OS) 01 04 04 01 SE 268691 L9E891 6E 84 OS 2 0 0 0 0 O e 0 O 6E1 041 01 SE SE) 01 OE 2L6691 h1O691 La OL 29 2 0 0 0 A 0 0 0 0 181 SE" of Of OE, 01 S'L2 SEL991 91091 El 2S a5 2 0 0 0 0 0 1• 0 0 121 OE' 01 S'L2 S'L2) 01 S2 96SLSI SIEISI 91 LE 64 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 401 S'L2) 01 S2 S2: 01 9'22 IOILSI EEE641 92 2S 4L 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LSI S2'� 01 5'22 S'22) 01 02 L61091 8"ESl SE LS IB h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LLI S'22t 01 02 02" 01 S'LI 629051 E9L241 02 S4 SL 8 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 151 02` 01 S'LI S'LI' 01 SI 60S6111 2LL141 02 44 BL L 1 2 tl 0 0 u I 0 ESI S'LI) 01 SI SI'- 01 01 989611 29BEE1 62 4b 881 2E it h 2 L 0 0 0 0 L9E Sly 01 01 01) 01 S 98EOE1 90LS21 E2 99 90 14 41 21 1 II 't 0 S 0 641 01) 01 S S NUNI S531 Will 461111 6 42 99 L2 9 9 u 81 0 tl 6 6 891 S NVBI 5531 110101 261091 ILESSI OIL ESL u901 2E1 82 92 E 9E 0 0 SI 6 OBL2 MIDI IN38 IN38 S.HH 1511111100 5.0001 311110 30111A WIN N11103N 111101 340]41 O1OH3500H 111130 NVI03M IN38 S5089 AIHINON OSL 830101,13SOOH HIM MORMON 8314311 1111 21551 S85h2 LEI 12 E0261 L112E 40992 111139 IL221 9B922 OIbLI 99091 2hS0E (19412 NV193N 116 IES S29 0211 IBE2 1082 83AO GNU OS 60 262 18E LIE SLB 2611 OS` 01 Oa IC 991 LE2 Oat SOS 528 Ito) 01 SE SB 412 662 442 OBS 42B SE) 01 OE ;9 841 E12 20 96E 89S OE` 01 9'L2 F9 621 261 251 22E 4L4 9'L2" 01 S2 86 L81 982 SE2 6S4 469 S21 01 9'22 1101 E12 LIE 142 261 SEL S'22) 01 02 hA 60 EL2 OS2 804 BS9 02, 01 S'LI 01 161 BEE ESE S2a BLL S'Ll) 01 SI E6E 044 EEO 60t 60L 8611 SI) of 01 I 414 696 6001 9L9 5891 01 01 5 OLE 102 ILS SO9 112E EE6 S NVH1 SS31 8422 SOEE ESSS 64611 91LO S99E1 11110I 54111138 SHINMO MIDI S431N38 58311110 111101 158111100 5.0001 c I SL 3911 < I S9 3910 340]41 010H3500H suouS00H 1111 43AD 002 OSI 001 06 08 OL 09 OS Oa OE 02 111101 GNU 01 01 01 01 01 01 of 01 01 01 WH1 ISI1111100 S• OIII 002 OSI 001 66 ')B 0L 09 OS Oh OE 02 SS31 3110341 919H3500N EhISI SSISI SSbS1 42L61 91)LS2 22811 2ELII 19821 16OL1 91622 12 IE 211 86 822 61 OE 04 BL OSI 22 22 L2 4L S6 SI 52 S4 19 26 E 81 4E 2S SS El t EE LE 2S 22 L2 64 99 IL 92 2E 94 89 1 L 61 L2 84 M9 26 4E L4 99 E01 E61 S6 921 2L1 591 ISI 9EI 681 OS2 2E2 202 E6 421 ESI SEI 001 92S SIL Su01 6E21 29111 9 SB 118-08 6L -SL 4L -OL 69 -S9 39V AB S011134 ISUVI100 MOO) 3NOH 30 30111A 49L 83010113500H H11M SOIOH3500H 83NNO NOININDONOJ ON11 03131 us 1111 926112 90842 6EE42 6101E 421124 OSB22 L202 9BIE2 45162 S202h LEI 651 SE2 E" LOEI It 911 501 661 481 SS 94 S9 181 BE2 9E 69 601 6S1 L02 OE 24 9L 121 L21 62 4E 99 LL 911 64 14 L6 411 BEI 2S L9 116 LEI 2hl 14 ES SO 411 511 24 It BL 911 811 101 141 261 281 L91 101 S4I 891 641 Ell OS 69 28 EL aS 008 ES01 2541 5812 922E I SB 18-08 64 SL 4L -OL 69 59 3911 Ad 583NM0 S6EI2 EE902 21112 SE192 WELE 541L1 06891 64L81 49942 998SE BSI 061 LL2 149 SESI 06 gal 541 LL2 4[S LL 89 26 SW HE IS hb 4S1 922 662 Ea 09 1)11 ELI 281 24 IS 56 411 091 IL 89 941 1)02 02 8L 66 041 S02 E12 09 OB EEI BL1 102 9L Oil 441 612 122 202 L92 49E L4E BIE LE2 %EE Blh IBE %IE Eal E61 SE2 802 4S1 82E1 89L1 LSh2 11211E 889h Will N11103N "]AD GNU OS OS'' 01 01 Olt` 01 SE SE - 01 OE OE', 01 S'L2 S'L2 01 S2 52- 01 S'22 S'221 01 02 02` 01 S'LI S'LI: 01 SI SIN 01 01 01: 01 S S N11H1 SS31 111101 ( I SO 118 -08 6L-SL 41-uL 69-S9 ISB111100 S,000t 39V Ad 111101 3NOJN1 010"3S00" SO10113SOOH 1111 NN 'UN101 -Ibtllll2ll ANUdNOJ AN3AU 'J 41UNJ :IN.i11J U3811 I3AUvm OvIISIMOH 83013 UNID3 :ND3 S31UMIIS3 6861 UI 31dul MGM 11ABUN SOINIS - '0'11 mroud 101 'PIPO 1a1JVM 0661 13i 1116 u.do3 h4941 BBEA 1286 Oil EEB01 *BLS 91921 N111N E80S 0052 L9ES1 W IN 222LE 24;6 WHIM ILSL 9hB8 8189 446 648 S4 83A0 ON11 05 802212 991402 12411 020 08L 9S OS) 01 04 002181 256081 O ISL BEL 2E 04" 01 SE 2SE291 Sb5451 24 6EL 92L OE SE 01 ICE 0,)OE91 OS2951 0 199 429 62 OE. 01 9'L2 008E41 462511 L9 L99 929 9E S'L2, 01 s2 OSLE /1 111111 0 E19 OE9 9S 52- 01 5'22 OOB541 OOSLEI hE SL9 219 LS S'22'- 01 02 00901 41LSE1 0 ELS RhS 2S 02 01 S'LI 9456E1 OS21E1 S2 Us L4S 111 S'Ll� 01 SI 194141 92SSE1 0 629 BP L62 SI, 01 01 ISSIEI 22SL21 S2 284 640 429 01� 01 S 488h21 692121 0 s14 691 OLE 9 ""I SS31 96LIll E9E111 91 LES 664 S691 111101 4LE9C1 E921E1 0 IN38 IN38 S.HH (SHV1100 S•000) 381VA 301VA 52 WIN NVI93M 18101 31107111 OIOH3SIIDH N113N NVIO3N IN38 SSON9 AIHINOM ESL 83910RH HIIN S.NH 831N38 110583d 3NO 1111 91921 IOLSI 80041 2456 49811 90401 54 29 L6 9S IB LEI 2E 2* 4L OE EE E9 62 2E 19 9E E2 6S 9S 4E 06 LS 62 99 2S OE 28 III 4B 561 L62 Eh2 09 425 401 828 OLE L61 L99 5691 4811 6LB2 SH3ININ SN3NN0 111101 < i SL 39V 06/01/20 Ud I]BV1 2L261 OL061 OL891 S2L11 2E641 091E1 ELI 412 LBE 291 L02 6LE L6 L21 422 101 Lit 812 8L 6L L91 F.8 ES 9E1 FEI EL 902 9E1 EL 602 E91 911 BL2 2L2 512 LB* 145 144 286 056 045 0641 wQ 22E 126 484E 9652 0809 S831N38 S83NN0 111101 9 S9 39V SOIOH3SOON NOS83d NO 1111 1111311 111110311 HIAO ON11 OS OS? 01 04 04, Ol SE SE` 01 OE OE• 01 9'L2 i' 01 52 52 01 5'22 9'22- 01 02 02, 01 S'll S'LI' 01 51 S1: of 01 01, 01 5 S WWI SS31 111101 15"111100 5,0001 IN07N1 OIDHISHOH )Of 'VIVO la1 nM I)atoJd AQ Sa1VIIIS3 6861 :33800S 66104 EnSBI h4941 BBEA 1286 044L EEB01 *BLS 0 0 E80S 0052 L9ES1 W IN 222LE 12041 50911 ILSL 9hB8 8189 EEB01 1144 0 0 OOSE OuO2 12411 WHIM E2 h1 S 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 83A0 ON11 OS 92 02 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L9 OS) Of Oh B 01 SI 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 hE 04) Ol SE 9 L 21 0 0 0 1) 0 0 0 0 0 S2 SE., 01 OE 2 9 91 1 u 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 S2 OE: 01 9'L2 1 4 11 u 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 91 S'L2, 01 92 2 L 91 I 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 52 I of 5.22 2 S El 0 0 0 u 4 0 0 0 0 02 S'22) 01 02 1 S SI 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 02- 01 S' L S LI LE E I 1 u to 0 0 1 0 S9 S'Ll; 01 SI 8 94 801 22 8 h 2 9 1) 0 0 0 102 S1. 01 01 21 24 EEI hE 21 of 1 11 u 0 S 0 092 01) 01 S 6 h2 99 L2 0 9 0 81 0 0 6 6 L91 S NMI SS31 501 902 99h 06 12 12 E SE 0 0 SI 6 IL6 1VIOl 83AO 002 OSI 001 Ob 08 OL 09 05 04 OE 02 111101 ONV 01 01 01 01 01 of Ol 01 01 of WHI ISU111100 SION) 002 OSI 001 06 08 OL 09 OS 0 OE 02 5531 31103111 OlOH3SH0H 94E2I 42921 28[21 9EBS1 25881 0426 1046 S9L6 4EL21 20491 01 sl 02 It LA SI 12 02 4E 29 6 El 01 62 9E 4 S 12 QE It 9 6 41 22 L2 L PI 61 02 Li II 81 L2 SE 24 h1 of 52 O4 bE 6 41 62 14 OL 92 4E IS 08 IB IL 96 IEI L21 LII 421 991 4E2 422 202 Eb 421 ESI SEI 001 66E 245 4SL 858 IE6 c 9 S8 48 -uB 6L-SL 4L 0L 69 -59 94 OE) Of 9'L2 S 19V AS SH31N38 IS8111100 5,0001 3MOH 10 30111A 09L 8301OHIS11011 WIN 5010113500H HIMO 1111111111001103 OW 0313133JS NOS83d 3110 IN 91991 146S1 61951 L0461 911542 L9SE1 BE04I 58041 944L1 L9112 N113N IL211 99911 64221 94651 61102 4266 20201 21801 S82h1 9160 NVI03V 21 LI E2 ES 601 22 2E E4 46 961 13A0 an OS 22 OE 62 at B6 LE IS 64 28 091 OS) Ol 04 21 81 21 04 S4 12 IE 22 69 18 00 01 SE E 9 42 9E at L II S4 99 68 9E> 01 OE 9 01 91 82 61 21 61 OE OS 94 OE) Of 9'L2 S L 11 11 61 21 LI OE IE 94 S'L2) 01 S2 B 41 91 61 02 61 82 E4 hS 29 92? 01 S'22 9 01 El 42 02 02 82 BE "9 6S 5'22) 01 02 S l BI OE SS 4I 12 0 IL S21 02) 01 S'LI LI h2 Eh S9 99 E4 BS h6 Shl 01 S'L1- 01 SI BS LL 901 E01 56 621 2L1 6E2 OE2 212 SI) Ol 01 EL L6 tEl 621 L01 L61 192 B9E ESE 60E 01? 01 S OS 99 IB 2L ES 01 061 412 02 ESI S WWI SS31 LL? 6LE 825 BS9 h9l 9L9 126 2821 9151 S891 111101 l 1 SB 4B -00 6L-SL 4L -OL 69 -s9 < 4 S8 48 -08 6L-SL 4L -OL 69 -S9 ISH111100 5.0001 39V AS SH3NN0 39V All 111101 31103111 010113S00H SQ1OH3S00H NOSH3d ]NO IN NM 'VNIO3 ANVdM01 A83AU ') 91VH1 :1113113 VISV !3'.1111011 OV31SIMBN 83013 VN103 :803 S31VNIIS3 6861 IUOd3N 1344VM 40INIS - '0'11 173108d jol ►1p0 laIIpM )al,) Id 1)661 IJI 14biJAdo3 11ul 'Piro 1611?M 1)afo)4 .Aq sa1pi)1s3 6861 :138005 68521 NU3N S006E 89261 48541 EOEB 1996 6641 0 4865 0 0 EGOS OOS2 Wn Sl NUN ' 2926 NV10311 SSSSE 24941 40511 2SE1 64LB 9999 0 EL44 0 0 OOSE 0002 06111 N11103N LLB 681 42 81AO ON11 09 B02922 EEEE12 41 4 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 831t0 GNU OS 408 011 hS OS) 01 O4 2LLbLl L49L1 S2 BI 12 0 0 )) 0 0 0 0 0 0 h9 OS) 01 O4 4EL OEL 62 Oh• 01 SE 696191 OOOSSI B 6 SI 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EE Oh' 01 SE IfL 22L 62 SE, 01 OE OOOE91 I)Qgsl 9 L 21 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 (1 0 S2 %V Ol AE 569 L19 62 OE) 01 S'L2 008M h62SE1 2 9 91 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S2 QE. 01 S'L2 S19 819 EE S'l2) 01 S2 0SLE41 EEEEEI 1 h 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 91 SW', 01 S2 ES9 L19 0 S2) 01 9'22 E85441 SLE4E1 2 9 SI 1 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 42 S2- 01 5'22 ES9 L19 dh S'22, 01 02 OOSL41 WW 2 S El ii 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 S'22: 01 02 19S E4S Eh 02) 01 9'LI &ZE1 OS21E1 1 S SI 1 0 0 0 0 G 0 0 0 22 02. 01 5'LI E9S IK 16 S'0. 01 SI 000041 202E1 S 21 9E E 1 0 P 0 0 BS VW 01 SI E25 984 BE2 SI, 01 Of IE1621 242921 9 1.2 201 02 9 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 L91 SI) 01 01 184 E94 L9h 01, Ol S 991421 EE8021 II EE IEI EE 11 S 0 it (1 0 5 0 02 01) 01 5 114 69E 2EE S NUHI 5531 596111 E9E111 6 81 S9 L2 0 0 r) BI O 0 6 6 SSI S 1111111 5531 929 164 E941 111101 )BStEl 991621 26 491 SSh L0 81 S 0 SE 0 0 SI 6 OLD 111101 1N31 IN38 SAM ISHU1100 5.0 01 3111VA 391VA 83A0 002 991 001 06 08 01 09 09 04 OE 02 111101 NV311 NU103M 111101 1M03N1 010113SBOH NUIN N11101N ONU 01 01 01 01 01 01 Of 01 of 01 NM IStl111100 S.01)0) 002 OSI 001 06 08 01, 09 OS 04 OE 02 5531 3NO3NI 010113SAOH ININ 55089 AIHINON ISIV1100 SAM 3MOH 30 301VA oSL 83010HH HIIN SAM 831M38 31VM33 NOSD3d 3NO #SL 113010113590" "1111 5019H3S90H 11311119 11111111111001103 GNU 031313345 3111M3J NOS83d 3110 68;21 99951 61811 8h641 61981 61591 WIN L4421 24921 19921 64451 9LE81 00951 81091 ILhSI E9691. 2BIE2 IS9E1 9L6E1 L9611 L40L1 29E02 NU3N 2926 59511 6566 LSOII E9W 54921 NVI03H 6006 L216 2546 L8021 r"SI LS601 49411 01611 69951 E8161 4196 2586 6OE01 06LE1 BS20 NV103M h2 12 IS 16 601 002 83AO ONU OS S D 11 12 94 9 6 21 L2 SS 11 LI E2 84 101 83AO GNU OS 4S 9L OEI BE1 E02 IhE 05? 01 0 SI 12 DI OE 4S 12 62 92 E4 bD 9E OS h4 EL BEI OS 01 04 62 O4 69 LB 611 902 1A 01 SE 8 21 6 S2 EE 21 LI 11 9E E4 02 62 112 19 91 04% 01 SE V. 2E 19 S6 211 L02 SE, 01 OE 4 S 02 82 BE E 9 E2 SE S4 11 E4 E9 ED SE. of OE 62 2E 19 SL 8L ESI OE; 01 S'l2 9 6 41 12 S2 9 01 91 L2 61 21 61 E Dh 4h 0E: 01 S'L2 EE E2 99 SL OS 521 S'L2:• 01 S2 L 01 91 0 S2 L II 01 LI 21 LI L2 L2 24 S'L2 01 S2 l4 IE BL 211 L9 611 S2) 01 9'22 01 SI 22 OE SE L 01 41 01 111 LI S2 9E 114 ES S2? 01 5'22 L• 82 SL 211 99 Bli 5'22 Ol 02 11 SI 12 EE 2E 9 01 21 02 BI 11 S2 EE ES 0; S'22) 01 02 [h 82 IL LEI 201 6E2 )2' 01 S'LI 8 II h2 SE 65 S L 91 92 84 El 81 114 19 L))1 02: 01 S'LI 16 IL 291 422 281 904 9'LI. 01 91 12 02 2h 99 L9 SI 12 9E S; 9; 9E 64 LL 121 E21 S'LI'• 01 SI BE2 L61 9E4 K§ LSE 16L SI, 01 01 9S LL SOI 201 46 94 E9 88 E0 LL 201 041 161 581 ILI W 01 01 l.Q4 BL2 S%L 0S9 464 "El 01. of S 011 841 602 002 E81 L9 60 221 LII 66 Lll LE? IEE LIE 202 01) of S 2Ef 281 41S SK 862 148 S NUHI 5531 ED 211 LEI 221 16 94 29 bL L9 64 621 411 112 6BI Ohl S N"l SS31 [941 5401 HOW SL62 LE22 2125 111101 h4E ILh 1149 OEL 28L S42 04E 094 h9S 829 6BS 118 8011 4621 0141 10191 50311118 SNIN110 1UIOl S4311138 S43NN0 1UIOl !SMU1100 5,0001 i S8 48 -08 6L -9L 4L -OL 69 -S9 9 S8 W08 61.-SL 41 -OL 6° S9 9 SO 48-08 6L -SL 41-01 69•;9 158111100 5,9001 i SL 39V i 59 390 31193111 01011359011 39V A9 5H)IN38 19V AB SMJNMO 39V 48 111101 IND341 018113S110H S01OH3SOOH 31VMIJ N0583d 3NO SOIDNIS90H 31VMIJ NOSH3d 3NO NM 'UN101 W 0110 ANVJMOJ Ad3AV 'J 911141 °1NI113 U34V 1348UM ONI151NOH d3013 VNI03 :y03 S3IVM1153 6861 UL 11901 ISUJ34 1318VW 001N3S - 'O'M 1731001 rul 'PI P0 Ia11Py I aroid Obb1 131 1461 a da3 'lul '1P1P0 MOW 130-114 Ap sa1P91 1s3 6861 :13HOOS 10ii LIB21 N113111 OS291I LIM 24621 EEBOI EEBOI 124L EE801 0 0 0 0 0 281E1 Ntl311 641.11 NVIOIM OOOOL 46821 24121 EEBOI EE8u1 9999 EE80I U 0 0 U U 2021 111010311 0201 L16 12 SIAO ON11 OS 999161 606061 6 01 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 03A0 GNU OS bl6 IBB 2 OS, 01 04 999161 999161 1 2 0 0 0 U 0 U Cl 0 U U E OS) 01 Oh L06 91B E Oh• 01 SE ODUSLI OOOSLI 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 1 04; 01 SE 088 16L I SE, 01 OE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r) 0 u 0 0 0 0 U SE, 01 OE 0 0, 0 OE'. 01 -L2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (� OE: 01 S' l2 60L uIL E Val 01 12 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 U 4 0 U 0 U 0 U S'L2) 01 S2 EBL 40L 6 S2) 01 S -22 OOOSLI OOOSLI 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 S2+ 01 S'22 EBL bOL 01 5'22? Ol 02 U 0 0 U U 0 0 U 0 U U U U U U S'22) 01 02 619 SLS 6 U2. 01 "'L1 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 02" 01 S' U 529 085 02 S11, 01 51 LLBOBI 999991 0 S 1 U U I 0 0 0 0 U r) L S'LI 01 SI BSS OOS 6S ;1', of 01 048891 E92SS1 2 81 9 2 2 h 2 0 0 U 0 0 9E SI- 01 01 964 224 LS 01, 01 S 01)SEEI EEEEEI 1 6 2 1, 1 5 1 u 0 0 C'. 0 02 01; 01 S 994 ELE BE S NVH1 SS31 000S21 ILSBL 0 9 0 0 (1 9 0 0 O 0 0 0 21 S WHI SS31 909 ISS 2E2 110101 894LL1 OSIV91 El 29 II t E 91 E 0 0 0 0 0 101 111101 11138 IN30 5.1111 IS8111100 5.9001 3O111A 38111A 83AO 002 OM 001 06 98 OL 09 OS 04 OE 02 111101 Ntl3M NVI0311 110101 31103111 010113snom Will NVI03M GNU 01 01 01 01 01 Ol 01 01 01 01 NVHI 1511111100 S.000) 002 PSI 001 U6 08 OL 09 (A 04 OE 02 SS31 31103111 OIDNISAON INIB SS049 AIMINOM IS8111100 5.000) 311011 30 30110A oSL 3301ONH HIM S,HH 031N38 31VV NOS83d 3N0 4SL 8301oH350011 HIM SPOH351104 83NAO 110111111001103 111111 0313133dS 31UN NOSH3d ]NO L1821 01441 214E1 61291 EIL02 106L1 N III LOSl1 62021 SLLEI E64L1 ELL12 96621 L09E1 19951 96602 Will% 66021 56121 S6E41 26LB1 6EE82 WIN 6401 BL621 IIE21 ISM BE891 96ESI 11101OIN LE601 SIEII 22221 EEESI SLE61 LOE21 EEE21 ILSEI Wd EEEE4 L0911 69611 2LB21 09291 OSLE2 W103M 12 S2 94 20 Sol L81 HIAO GNU OS S L 6 02 111 9 B II 92 115 11 SI 02 94 S6 83Ao GNU OS 2 S L 41 Q BE OS, 01 04 0 0 2 4 B 1 1 E S hl I I S 6 22 OS,., Of 04 E 2 S 01 8 Of 1W 01 SE 1 I I h E 0 1 1 4 2 1 2 2 8 S 04, 01 SE I 1 2. 9 S 11 SE: Ol of 0 0 1 2 E 0 0 1 I E 0 0 2 E 9 SE) 01 OE 0 0 0 E 1 4 OE:" 01 S'L2 (i 0 0 1 2 0 P 0 1 0 0 O 0 2 2 OE) of S'L2 E 0 E 8 E 11 9'L2` 01 S2 U 0 E E 2 0 6 0 1 2 0 ` 0 E. h h S'L2) 01 S2 6 E 21 12 9 L2 S2` 01 5'22 I E S S l 1 0 2 1 2 2 E L 9 6 S2) 01 S'22 01 1 II h2 L IE 5'22` 01 02 E E h L L U 0 1 h 2 E E S 11 6 S'22) 01 02 6 2 11 92 El 6E 02, 01 S -LI I E S 9 If 0 0 2 h L I E L OI BI 02 01 S'LI 02 El EE Bb EE IB S'LI. 01 SI S 9 6 hl hl 2 E 8 01 01 L 6 LI 42 42 S'L1: 01 SI 6; 94 Sol LUl 48 161 SI 01 01 Sl 81 92 S2 E2 21 Ill 02 02 BI L2 2E 91P Sh 14 91) 01 01 LS 92 ES OUI 91) 941 01: 01 S 111 BI 52 h2 61 9 8 21 21 8 02 92 LE 9E L2 01, 01 S BE SI ES 09 b2 48 S N11111 5531 01 21 91 El 6 4 4 L S h 41 91 E2 81 EI S NVH1 SS31 2f.2 6EI ILE 605 6SE 89B 111101 r.9 IL 901 821 641 2E bE 89 46 921 LB 011 hl.l 222 M 111101 SN)ININ SH3N110 110101 51111113.4 SHINNO 111101 158101100 5.01101 I SB bB -08 66 -SL 44-OL 69 -59 9 SB bB UB 6L Sl hL UL 69 59 1 S8 4B 48 6L SL 4L UL 69 S4 ISBV1100 5.0001 i SL 39V < I S9 39V 3MO3N1 01011350011 39V All 511311138 39V A8 SOW!) 39V All IVIO1 31107141 OIOH]SHOH S01OH]SOOH 311111 NOS83d 3NO SO10113SOON 31VU NOS83d ]NO NM 'VN103 06101,211 ANV41103 A43AU '3 911183 :1111113 103810 13.181011 OV3153UP 83013 1111103 :803 S3111MIIS3 6861 uh 119V1 I4Od3H 13.1111111 8011135 - '0'11 173108d 'rul 'el•O IaIIPM l)ar0rd 0661 171 146rrAdo3 0100E 0114 98SBE WIN U612 224L2 9110E2 WIN RULE L995E NV1039 64 094 6L612 111110311 S902 40E2 83A0 ONV OS 826 SE9 64 H3AO ONtl OS 494922 L9►L12 OSi 01 0► 548 219 62 OS) Ol 04 219902 808961 Obi 01 SE [to BSL ►E 0►' 01 SE IE9EL1 LE►ELI SE) 01 OE He SSL 44 SE, 01 OE IE►4L1 A6MI OEr 01 S'L2 BSL 02L 22 OE) 01 S'L2 000091 MKS S'L2) 01 92 BSL 22L 92 S'L2) 01 S2 4E96SI MESS Se` 01 S'22 4SL 02L 24 S2) 01 S'22 212651 092ES1 5'22) Ol 02 ►SL 02L 0 S'22- 01 02 510191 E099S1 02' 01 S'LI S09 LL9 24 02) 01 S'LI 61;251 IBOS►l S'Lli 01 SI S69 91.9 SE S'Lli 01 Sl 622SS1 821941 SI' 01 01 SIS9 S99 98 S1. Ol Of US01 L441►I 01) 01 S 919 019 IS 01. 01 S 094941 9E98E1 S 0111111 SS31 0 0 0 5 01VHl 5531 000521 000521 111101 PL IEL 60S 110101 S109L106110 ISHV1100 5.0001 0 IN38 111311 S.114 ISH111100 510001 3nIVA 301VA S2 ", 01 S'22 WIN NV103M 111101 31107111 0lOH3S00H 1111311 NV103N IN38 SSW AMNON oSL 83010HH HIM S.HH 01IN38 31003 0310HUM B M2 81862 90082 0100E 0114 98SBE WIN U612 224L2 b6B92 L96L2 RULE L995E NV1039 64 094 605 6E2 S902 40E2 83A0 ONV OS 62 061 612 OSI 1199 4EL OSi 01 0► bE III S41 121 L8E 609 Obi 01 SE ►4 211 9B1 E01 82E IE► SE) 01 OE 22 SL Lb OL 9E2 90E OEr 01 S'L2 92 96 221 99 BS2 92E S'L2) 01 92 24 ESI 561 2n1 9BE BBb Se` 01 S'22 L4 ►BI IE2 L01 614 925 5'22) Ol 02 e4 641 161 LB E62 08E 02' 01 S'LI SE E01 BEI OB L61 LL2 S'Lli 01 SI Be 281 OL2 bsl 12E SLb SI' 01 01 IS 011 191 69 9E1 S61 01) 01 S n 4 1 0 9 9 S 0111111 SS31 605 6561 8902 O4E1 919S 9569 111101 SHIIN38 S83NMO 111101 S131N33 SH3NNO 111101 ISHV1100 5.0001 0 i SL 3911 0 1 1 S9 39V 31103111 O1OH35IIOH S01ON35ROH 31dn07 OJIHHVW n6l01120 tlS 318111 iul 'ele0 lalreM l3alord A9 salesrls3 6861 33tlnoS ES919 10892 81SE2 EILLI ILSEI 64LE1 0 0OS21 0 0 0 0 68EOE 1111311 28215 2802 EL122 00591 OS211 EEEB 0 00521 1) 0 0 0 968L2 NV10311 IIE LS LE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 504 tl3A0 ON11 05 IB 94 BE 1 0 0 0 r) 0 0 0 0 991 05) 01 at IE IE 2E 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 r) 0 "s6 OY, 01 SE 14 04 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 Ir 0 ri Eel SE- Ol OE 11 22 82 1 0 0 0 0 ri 0 0 0 29 OE) 01 S'L2 SI 82 LE 2 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 S'L2) 01 S2 112 S4 6S E 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2E1 S2 ", 01 S'22 EE 2; 09 ► 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 GI S'22P Ol 02 61 at 09 L 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 621 02i 01 ;'LI SI 92 14 ► 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 LB S'Lli 01 SI 12 E► SL 01 E 0 0 1 Ir 0 0 0 ESI sl) 01 01 11 42 E► L 2 2 1) 0 0 0 0 0 68 01. 01 S 0 0 1 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 S Will SS31 E19 4S► 09S 14 L S 0 1 1318VW 0 u 0 1891 111101 93A0 002 OSI 001 06 09 OL 09 OS 04 OE 02 111101 ONV 01 01 of 01 01 01 01 at 01 of WHI 1511111100 5,000) 002 051 001 06 u8 OL 09 OS 04 OE 02 SS31 3903N1 0101143S00H 280E2 6BE22 82942 0060E IESBE OEL12 EEE02 2SIE2 25182 6L69E II 91 22 SS SEI 4 L BI 14 08 21 L SI 04 L4 01 81 91 S2 4E 4 S El 02 82 9 9 41 LI Se II 6 2e IE 62 21 41 12 92 2E 01 El 61 E2 22 8 El 41 E2 22 22 02 BE 1E 2E 21 E2 91 8 0 0 u 0 u 0 221 691 822 S►E 984 i S9 4(1-08 6L -SL ►L -OL 69 -S9 L21 OE) Ol S'L2 12 39V All SH31N38 ISH111100 5.0001 3MOH 30 3nivA #9L V3010H3SnOH HIM 5010113S00H 43NN0 110111111001103 00 0311133IS 31d003 031NIVU 9LS0E L200E 20062 IL96E 090ES SL082 ►E6L2 68LL2 E86LE 20E64 1111311 896L2 16EL2 222L2 09E9E E9205 26852 98052 9L192 1984E E9094 11111034 121 PEI E02 694 ?Ell 2E1 251 SU 42S IL21 tl)A0 01111 OS 44 BL 89 LEI L92 B4 S8 98 BLI LEE OS) 01 04 04 E2 84 ►21 251 25 OE E9 491 661 00 01 SE 62 9; LS 28 401 bE 4L EL L01 BEI SE) 01 OE SI 61 It 29 66 61 42 4S 20 L21 OE) Ol S'L2 12 22 E5 S9 L6 L2 92 L9 28 221 S'L2) at S2 It IE I9 S11 BII 2S at E01 941 01 S2) 01 S'22 94 LS 19 Ell 221 BS IL 201 Ibl 451 5'22) 01 02 9E 94 L9 48 09 94 65 99 L01 28 02) 01 S'L1 52 94 2E L4 L4 EE 69 94 OL 69 S'L1: 01 SI 94 6S LL 2L L9 99 L8 SII 901 66 SI) 01 01 82 84 4E 02 9 04 IL OS 82 9 01'. 01 S 0 E I I 1 0 E 1 1 1 S IS"I M1 264 429 E►B 16E1 9922 419 EBL ILOI 9EL1 Me 1VIOI 1 98 48-08 6L-SL bL-OI 69 -59 1 SB 48-08 6L-sL ►L -nL 69 -S9 (S1�)1100 5.000) 39V AB S83NMO 3911 All 1V101 31107111 010113SBOH IA1NO 3903N1 31dn03 03188VMI S0101135nOH 31d103 0314WM HM 'VNI03 ANVdMO3 A33AU '3 911183 :1113113 V3VV 1318VW OV31SJVOH 83(113 VN103 :403 S31tl1111S3 6861 ISOM 131NVU HOIN3S - '0'11 URDU )uI 'e1v-0 IalirN I )at o)d 0661 (J) 196t Mq •jul 'e1r0 lal)PM l)alo)d AQ salt-611s] 6861 :3781105 6110E N113M 0 ISM 2LLOE OOS2E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2942E 1111311 66162 111110311 0 E002E 0050E OOS2E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19LIE W103M -- 0 0 0 HAD ON OS L921L1 666691 0 41 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 113A0 ON OS 246 08 h 05) Ol 01 6092LI LWL91 0 El h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 If OS) of 04 888 66L S 0►) of SE 6EO991 00S291 0 L E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 01) 01 SE 088 161 11 SE) 01 OE L2"Ll ESS491 0 E2 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EE SE) of OE ILL LOL hl OE) 01 S'L2 16LL91 000191 0 h2 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ►E OE` 01 S'12 ILL OEL I S'L2) 01 S2 999991 999991 0 S 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 S'L2) Of S2 0 0 0 S2) of 9'22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 92� of S'22 0 0 0 S'22) Ol 02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S'22) 01 02 0 0 0 02) Of S'LI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02) Ol S'LI 8L9 09S 1 S'LI) Ol SI OOOSLI 000SLI 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 S'LI) 01 SI 2S9 ISS B St) of 01 L91291 241LS1 0 9 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ii SI', 01 01 0 0 0 01) of S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1) 0 0 0 01) 01 S 0 0 0 S Will 5531 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u 0 0 0 S WHl 5531 908 89L " 111101 EL8691 S21S91 0 E6 K 1 0 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 821 18101 IN38 IN38 S.HH 158111100 5.0001 311111A 301VA 03AO 002 OSI 001 06 08 OI 09 OS 04 OE 02 111101 N113M NU103M 111101 3MOJN1 OIDH3SIIDH NVIM 11111030 ON 01 01 01 01 Ol of 01 01 01 01 WWI 151111100 5.0001 002 OSI 001 06 08 OL 09 OS 0► OE 02 5531 31103101 010113511014 IN38 SS089 AIHINOM 158111100 S.0001 3110H 10 30111A +SL 83010143511011 HIM 501011350011 831N38 83NIO +9L d30lOH3SnDH HIM S010H350011 8311"0 111111011101111193 ON 0313133dS 1131110 6410E 0002E OL21E 102EE 4544E EEI►E 1111311 6ME 96162 60862 SIBIE ME LELIE L602E 9L61E 2E2EE 069BE 90SOE S060E 9081E 26L2E SL28E WIN 66462 91EIE 2080E 2892E II►4E 4EOK NVI03M S2182 00062 L8962 BESIE ES19E OSL62 S290E ISSIE 9L62E MBE 51962 19862 ISEIE S892E 2961E 11111030 Q 61 61 8 201 Oil 83AO ON 05 0 0 0 2 9 h 9 6 12 29 1 9 6 E2 89 HAD ON OS 4 12 92 SI 19 6l OS) 01 01 0 2 2 E B S 8 B 41 62 S 01 01 LI LE OS) 01 01 S El BI 22 it E6 04) 01 SE 1 2 2 S 21 E S S LI 14 4 L L 22 ES 01) 01 SE 11 6E OS 04 SEI SLI SE) Of OE 1 2 B 21 It h L 02 14 SS S 6 9E ES 2L SE) 01 OE 41 14 SS h2 18 S01 OEN 01 S•L2 E 4 L 01 0 6 EI 61 IE 6 21 LI S2 14 6 OE) Ol S'L2 I 01 11 1 it 21 9'L2) Ol S2 0 1 0 0 0 E S 2 1 0 E 9 2 1 0 S'L2) 01 S2 0 0 0 0 0 0 S2) Ol 9'22 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S21 01 9'22 0 0 0 0 0 0 9'22:• 01 02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.22) 01 02 0 0 0 0 0 0 02) Ol S•LI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1) (1 0 0 0 0 0 0 02) 01 S'LI I 1 S I El hl S'Ll) 01 SI 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 E h S 0 1 h 1 S S'LI, 01 SI B SI E2 41 L2 Ih SD 01 01 2 E E ► 2 E S L L S S 0 01 11 L SI) 01 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 OD 01 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ole 01 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 S Will 5531 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S Will SS31 4h 291 902 Set 405 629 IVI01 L hl E2 9E S4 It OS IB 9E1 902 BE 49 ►01 20 192 111101 S4111114 SHINNO 111101 S431N38 58311"0 111101 15H01100 5,000) f 4 S8 h8 -08 6L -SL 4L -ft 69 ;9 1 18 h8 08 6L-,L ►L-OL 69-59 < 1 SB 48 -08 6L -9L 4L-OL 69 -S9 158111100 MOO) Z SL 390 : 1 99 3911 31103111 010H3S00H 3911 All SH31N38 3911 AS S83NNO 3911 AS 19101 3MOJN1 OlUH35110H SO101135110H 831110 SO1011350011 831110 NM 'uN103 u6101121) ANUdNOJ A83AV 'J 911187 :IHil13 113811 13181111 OV31S311014 113013 11NIO3 '803 S3111MI153 6861 119 3101 ISOM 13.I811M HOIN35 - '0'11 1J310Hd APPENDIX S PCSMART Report Assumption and Summary Tables Edina Elder Homestead Market Area %O0'L %00'06 OOO`1SS %00'OL %OO•r EE %00'E2 HOW, SIaI 902 %OO'S OISS OS S00 `as SOL`ls 9NIN3d0 %00'SS %00'0 %00.09 %00'0 MID MID %00'OS %0010 %00'0 SL 43uedn »o to 1eaA. 1s1tj 'l W 'tlNI03 V38tl 133SVW GURS30H 83013 VNI03 :803 SNOIldWMV AMU .661 indw N lalea u014e4eu8df O61E01 0 01 tl atleua3S % ( - - -- W1 a1e45 1aVeW palee1ls3 'El 0 # ( - - - -- souped aMl 0 # ( - - - -- 5oolpae aup 0 # ( - - - -- o1Pn1S %O0'L %00'06 OOO`1SS %00'OL %OO•r EE %00'E2 HOW, SIaI 902 %OO'S OISS OS S00 `as SOL`ls 9NIN3d0 %00'SS %00'0 %00.09 %00'0 MID MID %00'OS %0010 %00'0 SL 43uedn »o to 1eaA. 1s1tj 'l W 'tlNI03 V38tl 133SVW GURS30H 83013 VNI03 :803 SNOIldWMV AMU .661 indw N N O61E01 0 .661 indw N N O61E01 0 SMART SUMMARY REPORT FOR: EDINA ELDER HOMESTEAD MARKET AREA 04/03/90 SCENARIO A EDINA, MN #i ASSUMPTIONS *# ##SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS** -------------- --- ------ -------- -------- -- - - -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - MIN. AGE - DATE OF ENTRY 75 - - -- --- --UNIT SIZE--- - - - - -- - RATIO OF RENT TO INCOME 85.00% STUDIO 1 BED 2 BED TOTAL - FULL OCCUPANCY PERCENTAGE 93.00% --------- -------- -------- -------- - UPPER INCOME LIMIT 651,000 PRELIMINARY UNADJUSTED TARGET MARKET 19 108 0 127 - ESTIMATED MARKET SHARE 10.00% (BASED ON NEED, AGE 5 ABILITY TO AFFORD) - PERCENT FROM TARGET MKT. 70.00% MINUS HH'S IN EXIST /COMP FAC 0 0 0 0 ----- ---- - - - -- - - - -- - MONTHLY FEES ADJUSTED TARGET MARKET FROM RESIDENTIAL BASE 19 108 0 127 Studio $1,705 ----- ----- - ---- - - - -- One Bedroom $2,005 ADJUSTMENT CALCULATIONS: Two Bedroom f0 ADJ FOR NURSING HOME POTENTIAL 205 Second Person Charge $510 ADJ FOR AGE L INCOME QUAL. LIVING WITH <65 HH'S 33 POTENTIAL FROM NURSING HOMES 205 SUB- TOTAL 3365 Total Nursing Beds in /adj MA 1815 --------------- - -- Est. % private pay 49.00% APPLY MARKET SHARE RATE OF 10.00% 37 Est. % not requiring skilled care 23.00% ADJ FOR MARK AREA DRAW OF 70.00% AT 53 100 PERCENT OCCUPANCY - AGE b INCOME QUALIFIED PERSONS ADJ FOR FULL OCCUPANCY OF 93.00% 57 LIVING WITH (65 HH'S 33 PRELIMINARY UNIT POTENTIAL 57 **SUMMARY OF HOUSEHOLD COUNTS BY TYPE ## ___________________________________________ __________________ °______ ° °_ ° °° ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ STUDIO 1 BED 2 BED --------------------- - - - - -- --------------------- - - - - -- --------------------------- HOUSEHOLD TYPE INCOME COUNT INCOME COUNT INCOME COUNT ------------ - - - - -- WITH ------------ - - - - -- WITH ------------ - - - --- WITH DISCOUNT LOW HIGH (DISC.) LOW HIGH (DISC.) LOW HIGH (DISC.) HOMEOWNER- - - - -- --------------------- - - - - -- --------------------- - - - - -- --------------------------- - ONE PERSON FEMALE 0.00% $13,300 $17,300 it $17,300 $51,000 28 ---NA --- -- -NA - -- 0 - ONE PERSON MALE 0.00% $13,300 $17,300 2 $17,300 $51,000 3 -- -NA - -- -- -NA - -- 0 - MARRIED COUPLE 50.00% -NA - -- -- -NA - -- 0 $21,200 $51,000 40 -- -NA - -- - - -NA - -- 0 - OTHER 0.00% $13,300 $17,300 1 $17,300 $51,000 12 -- -NA - -- -- -NA - -- 0 RENTER - ONE PERSON FEMALE 0.00% $21,800 $25,700 6 $25,700 $51,000 16 -- -NA - -- -- -NA - -- 0 - ONE PERSON MALE 0.00% $21,800 $25,700 1 $25,700 $51,000 2 -- -NA - -- -- -NA - -- 0 - MARRIED COUPLE 50.00% -- -NA --- -- -NA - -- 0 $32,200 $51,000 4 -- -NA - -- -- -NA - -- 0 - OTHER 0.00% $21,800 $25,700 0 $25,700 $51,000 3 -NA - -- -- -NA - -- 0 PRELIMINARY UNADJUSTED TARGET MARKET 19 108 0 SOURCE: 1989 Estimates by Project Market Data, Inc. Copyright (C) 1990 Project Market Data, Inc. (a ;e8 not ;eu ;auad) %00'SI y otjeua3s % < - - -- a;ej aje4S ;aVeW pa ;eat ;s3 'ET 0 f ( - - - -- soojpag awl 0 i ( - - - -- soojpag aup 0 S ( - - - -- otpn ;S sat ;tlpej ant ;t;adsoo but;stx3 ut sPl04asnoH 10 411110) pa ;es! 19 '21 %00'L % ( - - -- span0jd uo asomt ;saja ;ut lenuuy %00'06 % ( - - - -- ;uaj o; Aldde o; spaamid lenptsaj anlen asoy 10 ;ua3lad -11 0001ISS S ( - - - -- ;eajq ;sajeau o; ;!stl aaout jaddn •01 %0010L % ( - - - -- Me 184jes 9011 MEJP ;ua3lad '6 %00'L % ( - - - -- a6elmiad A3ue3en pattltge ;S 'B EE t ( - - - -- 5,44 S9> 6utntl lenb 8103UI Pue 86y •L %00'E2 % ( - - - -- aje3 pall! ;s 6utjtnbei ;ou % • ;s3 %00'6b % (- - --- Aed a;entjd % • ;s3 SIB1 S C - - - -- VW tpe /ut spag 6utsjnN le;ol 902 :sasOH 6utslnN 0011 s;uaptsaj let ;ua ;od -q %00'3 % ( - - - -- a;ej not ;etlap lenuuy 010 S C - - - -- a6je4o uosjad puo)aS OS S < - - - -- soojpag owl S0012S i ( - - - -- soupag auQ SOL`1S S C - - - -- olpn ;S BE NNO :saal Al4;uos Pasodosd 'S %OO'SB % < - - - -- aao wt xe; -aid o; ;uaj 10 01;e8 •q 1140010 % C - - - -- AM %00'OS % ( - - - -- aldnoo patjjeW %0010 % ( -- - -- aleW uosied -aup %0010 % ( - -- -- alesaj uosjad -aup :sja ;ua8 %00'0 % ( - - - -- ja4 ;0 %00109 % C - - - -- aldno3 patljeW %00'0 % C - - - -- aleW uosjad -aug %0010 % ( - - - -- alesaj uosjad -aug :sjau«oasoH :sadA; plo4asno4 10 s ;uno3 but ;unustp jot sa ;e8 'E EL = 6661 ut abe 'u!W SL S c - - - -- 6utuado 10 a ;ep uo abe snstutW :a6uej a6y •2 1661 8A ,: - -- -- Auuedn»o 10 jean ;sill '1 indNI NW 'VNi03 y38" 13ASVW WIMP 83013 VNI93 06 1EO /h0 :802 'c,NGIidWnSSN 1mmd SMART SUMMARY REPORT FOR: EDINA ELDER HOMESTEAD MARKET AREA 0.001 $21,800 $25,700 04/03/90 SCENARIO A EDINA, MN 0.00% 121,800 625,700 1 - MARRIED COUPLE 50.00% -- -NA - -- ff ASSUMPTIONS ff 0 - OTHER *#SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS** $21,800 $25,700 0 PRELIMINARY --------------------------------------- - MIN. AGE - DATE OF ENTRY - - - - -- 75 19 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - - - -- -UNIT SIZE--- - - - - -- - RATIO OF RENT TO INCOME 85.00% STUDIO 1 BED 2 BED TOTAL - FULL OCCUPANCY PERCENTAGE 93.00% --------- -------- -------- -------- - UPPER INCOME LIMIT $51,000 PRELIMINARY UNADJUSTED TARGET MARKET 19 108 0 127 - ESTIMATED MARKET SHARE 15.00% (BASED ON NEED, AGE L ABILITY TO AFFORD) - PERCENT FROM TARGET MKT. 70.00% MINUS HH'S IN EXIST /COMP FAC 0 0 ----- ---- 0 - - - -- 0 - - - -- - MONTHLY FEES ADJUSTED TARGET MARKET FROM RESIDENTIAL BASE 19 108 0 127 Studio $1,705 ----- ----- ----- ----- One Bedroom $2,005 ADJUSTMENT CALCULATIONS: Two Bedroom f0 ADJ FOR NURSING HOME POTENTIAL 205 Second Person Charge $510 ADJ FOR AGE L INCOME DUAL. LIVING WITH <65 HH'S ------------------ 33 - POTENTIAL FROM NURSING HOMES 205 SUB -TOTAL 365 Total Nursing Beds in /adj MA 1815 --------- --------- Est. % private pay 49.00% APPLY MARKET SHARE RATE OF 15.00% 55 Est. % not requiring skilled care 23.00% ADJ FOR MARK AREA DRAW OF 70.00% AT 79 100 PERCENT OCCUPANCY - AGE L INCOME QUALIFIED PERSONS ADJ FOR FULL OCCUPANCY OF 93.00% 85 LIVING WITH <65 HH'S 33 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- ------ - - - - -- ------------------------------------------- PRELIMINARY UNIT POTENTIAL 85 f #SUMMARY OF HOUSEHOLD COUNTS BY TYPEff --------------------------------------------------------"-"-""-"--"--------""""-- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ STUDIO 1 BED 2 BED HOUSEHOLD TYPE --------------------- INCOME - - - - -- --------------------- COUNT INCOME - - - - -- COUNT --------------------------- INCOME COUNT ------------ - - - - -- WITH ------------ - - - - -- WITH ------------ - - - - -- WITH DISCOUNT LOW HIGH (DISC.) LOW HIGH (DISC.) LOW HIGH (DISC.) HOMEOWNER--- - - - - -- --------------------- - - - - -- --------------------- - - - - -- --------------------------- - ONE PERSON FEMALE 0.001 $13,300 $17,300 11 $17,300 $51,000 28 ­NA -- -NA --- 0 - ONE PERSON MALE 0.00% $13,300 $17,300 2 $17,300 $51,000 3 -- -NA - -- -- -NA - -- 0 - MARRIED COUPLE 50.00% -- -NA - -- -- -NA - -- 0 $21,200 $51,000 40 -- -NA - -- -- -NA - -- 0 - OTHER 0.00% 613,300 $17,300 1 $17,300 $51,000 12 - - -NA - -- -- -NA - -- 0 RENTER - ONE PERSON FEMALE 0.001 $21,800 $25,700 6 - ONE PERSON MALE 0.00% 121,800 625,700 1 - MARRIED COUPLE 50.00% -- -NA - -- -- -NA - -- 0 - OTHER 0.00% $21,800 $25,700 0 PRELIMINARY UNADJUSTED TARGET MARKET 19 SOURCE: 1989 Estimates by Project Market Data, Inc. $25,700 $51,000 16 -- -NA - -- - - -NA - -- 0 $25,700 651,000 2 -- -NA- -- -- -NA - -- $32,200 $51,000 4 -- -NA - -- -- -NA - -- 0 $25,700 $51,000 3 -- -NA - -- -- -NA - -- 0 108 0 Copyright (C) 1990 Project Market Data, Inc. PROJECT ASSUMPTIONS FOR: 04/03/90 EDINA ELDER HOMESTEAD MARKET AREA EDINA, MN INPUT 1. First year of occupancy - - -- YR 1991 2. Age range: Minimum age on date of opening --- - -> # 75 Min. age in 1989 = 73 3. Rates for discounting counts of household types: Homeowners, One-person Female - - - - -> % 0.00% One- person Male - - -- -r % 0.00% Married Couple - - - - -> % 50.00X Other - - - --> % 0.00% Renters: One- person Female - - - - -> X 0.00% One-person Male -- - - -> % 4.00% Married Couple - - - - -> % 50.00% Other - - - - -> X 0.00% 4. Ratio of rent to pre -tax income ---- -> % 85.40% 5. Proposed monthly fees: OPENING Studio - - - - -> $ $1,705 One Bedroom - - ---> $ 12,005 Two Bedroom - - - - -> f $0 Second Person Charge - - - - -> $ $510 Annual deflation rate -- - - -> % 5,00% b. Potential residents from Nursing Homes: 205 Total Nursing Beds Wadi MA - - - - -> # 1815 Est. X private pay - --- -> % 49.00% Est. % not requiring skilled care - -- - -> % 23.00% 7. Age and income qual living !65 hh's -- -- -> # 33 8. Stabilized vacancy percentage - - - --> % 7.00% 9. Percent draw from market area -----> % 70.00% 10. Upper income limit to nearest break -- - - -> $ $51,000 11. Percent of home value residual proceeds to apply to rent - - - --> % 90.00% Annual interest income on proceeds - - --> % 7.00% 12. Estimated count of Households in Existing Competitive Facilities Studio - - - --> # 0 One Bedroom - - ---> # 0 Two Bedroom - - - --> # 0 13. Estimated Market Share rate - - - -> % Scenario A 20.00% (Penetration Rate) SMART SUMMARY REPORT FOR: EDINA ELDER HOMESTEAD MARKET AREA 04/03/90 SCENARIO A EDINA, MN ** ASSUMPTIONS ** * *SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS** --------------------------------------- - - - - -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - MIN. AGE - DATE OF ENTRY 75 - - - - --- --UNIT SIZE--- - - - - -- - RATIO OF RENT TO INCOME 85.00% STUDIO 1 BED 2 BED TOTAL - FULL OCCUPANCY PERCENTAGE 93.00% ---- ----- ---- -- -- -- ------ -- - -- --- - UPPER INCOME LIMIT $51,000 PRELIMINARY UNADJUSTED TARGET MARKET 19 108 0 127 - ESTIMATED MARKET SHARE 20.00% (BASED ON NEED, AGE 5 ABILITY TO AFFORD) - PERCENT FROM TARGET MKT. 70.00% MINUS HH'S IN EXIST /COMP FAC 0 0 0 0 - - - -- - - - -- - - - -- - - - -- - MONTHLY FEES ADJUSTED TARGET MARKET FROM RESIDENTIAL BASE 19 108 0 127 Studio $1,705 - - - -- - - - -- - - - -- - - - -- One Bedroom $2,005 ADJUSTMENT CALCULATIONS: Two Bedroom $0 ADJ FOR NURSING HOME POTENTIAL 205 Second Person Charge $510 ADJ FOR AGE L INCOME DUAL. LIVING WITH (65 HH'S 33 ------------------ - POTENTIAL FROM NURSING HOMES 205 SUB -TOTAL 365 Total Nursing Beds in /adj MA 1815 --------------- - -- Est. % private pay 49.00% APPLY MARKET SHARE RATE OF 20.00% 73 Est. % not requiring skilled care 23.00% ADJ FOR MARK AREA DRAW OF 70.00% AT 104 100 PERCENT OCCUPANCY - AGE b INCOME BUALIFIED PERSONS ADJ FOR FULL OCCUPANCY OF 93.00% 112 LIVING WITH (65 HH'S 33 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRELIMINARY UNIT POTENTIAL 112 * *SUMMARY OF HOUSEHOLD COUNTS BY TYPE ** ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ STUDIO 1 BED 2 BED --------------------- - - - - -- --------------------- - - - - -- --------------------------- HOUSEHOLD TYPE INCOME COUNT INCOME COUNT INCOME COUNT ------------ - - - - -- WITH ------------ - - - - -- WITH ------------ - - - - -- WITH DISCOUNT LOW HIGH (DISC.) LOW HIGH (DISC.) LOW HIGH (DISC.) HOMEOWNER--- - - - - -- --------------------- - - - - -- --------------------- - - - - -- --------------------------- - ONE PERSON FEMALE 0.00% $13,300 $17,300 11 $17,300 $51,000 28 - - =NA - -- -- -NA - -- 0 - ONE PERSON MALE 0.00% $13,300 $17,300 2 $17,300 $51,000 3 -- -NA- -- -- -NA - -- 0 - MARRIED COUPLE 50.00% -- -NA - -- -- -NA - -- 0 $21,200 $51,000 40 -- -NA - -- -- -NA - -- 0 - OTHER 0.00% $13,300 $17,300 1 $17,300 $51,000 12 -- -NA - -- -- -NA - -- 0 RENTER - ONE PERSON FEMALE 0.00% $21,800 $25,700 6 $25,700 $51,000 16 -- -NA - -- -- -NA - -- 0 - ONE PERSON MALE 0.00% $21,800 $25,700 1 $25,700 $51,000 2 -- -NA - -- -- -NA - -- 0 - MARRIED COUPLE 50.00% -- -NA- -- -- -NA - -- 0 $32,200 $51,000 4 -- -NA - -- -- -NA - -- 0 - OTHER 0.00% $21,800 $25,700 0 125,700 $51,000 3 -- -NA - -- -- -NA - -- 0 PRELIMINARY UNADJUSTED TARGET MARKET 19 108 0 SOURCE: 1989 Estimates by Project Market Data, Inc. Copyright (C) 1990 Project Market Data, Inc. V �v91NA, �1 o e ` :.& 0 • B,oW,,�'�� REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland From: Craig Larsen Date: April 16, 1990 Subject: P -90 -1, Final Development Plan, Cahill Road and Amundson Avenue. George Kosmides Recommendation: Info/Background- Agenda Item # III . B. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. - Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion The proposal was continued pending the outcome of Tax Increment studies at West 70th Street and Cahill. The development concept for 70th and Cahill does not directly impact this property. However, including this parcel in a redevelopment is not precluded. The proponent has requested a hearing on his original proposal. The result would be a 15,000 square foot office building developed independently of possible redevelopment north of Amundson Avenue. =posed town =uses and the single family residential lots also poses �co She said it is her opinion a real problem for her is lot 9. The nd proximity to the townhouses in her opinion .makes it an undes le lot. Commissioner Palmer told the Commission that even thong a establishment of the new subdivision ordinance has been accomplished; is to be used as a guide that affords the Commission and Council flexibility d judgement, to determine if the development as a whole makes good plannin nse. He pointed out it is the job of the Commission to review the ordin and Comprehensive Plan and recommend to the Council our views. Commissioner Runyan questioned Mr. Ga' n if lot 11 would be accessed off West 70th Street. Mr. Gair explained t lot 11 would be accessed off the cul de sac by a private easement throu ots 10 and nine. Commission Members expressed concern over this s' ation. They said they do not want a private easement over lots nine an to provide access to lot 11. Commissioner McClelland pointed out it is unfair to those property owners, and does not make good planning se Commissioner L. Johnson asked Mr. Clark if the house on lot 11 would fr on West 70th Street. Mr. Clark said the house would front on West 70th Str with a rear loading garage. Commissione . Johnson said in his opinion he does not find lot 7 to be unreason a but feels the configuration of lots 9,10,11, and their relationship to th ownhouses and the grade of the property is a concern. He observed that a po ibility may be to located the row of townhouses nearest the single family to could be located at the toe of the slope. Commissioner L. Johnson P -90 -1 Final Development Plan Qn 7101 -13 Amundson Avenue , V rl George Kosmides \1��glJLocated: Southeast corner of Cahill Road and Amundson Avenue Request: Construct new office building Mr. Larsen presented his report and noted the property measures approximately 3.5 acres in area and is developed with a single story warehouse building containing 37,700 square feet of floor area. Mr. Larsen, added the proponent requests permission to construct a single story, 15,000 square foot office - warehouse building on the westerly portion of the site, south of Amundson. Mr. Larsen concluded staff's view of the proposed development is generally positive. The development intensity is less than the Ordinance would allow, adequate parking is provided, but the shape of the site does make development difficult. The difficulty of the site creates the need for variances. Mr. Larsen said staff supports the parking setback from Amundson Avenue. He explained the lack of site depth is a hardship and the property directly across the street is commercial. Mr. Larsen continued adding staff also supports the continuation of the non - conforming setbacks for the site in order to meet code parking requirements, thus staff supports the drive aisle variance south of the supported building. Mr. Larsen told the Commission could not support the proposed setback and added the building setback from Cahill Road should be increased from the proposed 65 feet to the required 75 feet. This would provide additional green space and room for additional screening along Cahill. This would also eliminate the need for the parking setback variancer from Cahill Road. Mr. Larsen concluded staff would also like to see landscaping meet ordinance requirements and that the materials stored outside should be removed. He suggested that additional landscaping should be concentrated in front of the building along Cahill and Amundson Road. Mr. Larsen concluded subject to the recommended changes staff recommends approval of the proposed Final Development Plan. The proponent, Mr. Kosmides, and his architect Mr. Reese were present. Chairman Johnson questioned if shared parking could become a concern. Mr. Larsen clarified that the property has common ownership and if the properties were split they would comply with the parking requirements. Mr. Larsen added he believes parking on site is adequate. Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Larsen if traffic would flow one -way. Mr. Larsen indicated traffic would flow one -way. Commissioner Runyan questioned the grading needed on the site and wondered if there could be a water run -off problem. Mr. Larsen agreed with Mr. Runyan's observation and noted that permit approval would be contingent on an approved grading plan from the City Engineer. Commissioner L. Johnson observed that the drive -way would be on the Jetco property line and asked if they have any objection. Mr. Larsen said to his knowledge Jetco has no objection. Mr. Reese told the Commission the building would be moved back 10 feet as recommended by Mr. Larsen. He also explained that a catch basin would be installed in the rear. Mr. Reese added that landscaping would be brought up to the City's requirements. Commissioner Faust asked Mr. Reese if there would be loading docks constructed on the building. Mr. Reese said there would be no loading docks constructed. He explained that the anticipated users of this site are small, such as a print shop etc. Commissioner McClelland questioned why the building has been allowed to store goods and materials outside without the City enforcing the outdoor storage ordinance. Mr. Larsen explained that staff police sites, and violations of the code, on a complaint basis. When staff went to view the site it was noted that outdoor storage of materials was taking place. Staff felt comfortable in adding as subject to approval removal of these materials. Mr. Larsen noted that this was also an opportunity to upgrade the landscaping on the site, which in its present condition is below ordinance standards. Commissioner L. Johnson moved to recommend approval of the proposal subject to staff conditions that the materials comply with Ordinance requirements, that the current storage of goods and materials be discontinued, that the grading plan be reworked and approved by the City Engineer and that the building setback be - - increased from the proposed 65 feet to 75 feet. Commissioner Ingwalson seconded the motion. Ayes; McClelland, Ingwal'son, Hale, Faust, Workinger, Shaw, Palmer, Runyan, L. Johnson, G. Johnson. Motion carried. W�r AL EK VIEW L qO,y P IL AS DR N wii:a:•i_ jt -i�� O'a'r � .. ... BLEy �.,.......: Y•:.�� RIDGE - W ;-WARDWELL'.! ';'' a --LEWIS P/�RK ,:� "q FINAL DEVELOPMENT NUMBER P -90 -1 _PLAN L O C A TI Q N Southeast corner of Cahill Road and Amundson Avenue REQUEST Construct new office - warehouse building EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT ''Erb IR -vr11 �S MN I L✓ 1 F✓ y �G I � t_' I � C� *•" cv GJ�n'n EASErrEnT - - - � -1. yfI 517-: FLAN yuiE !'• _.. 4v.c. �a••or�o c..a B.a.`. mwn... C • I I � � I ice! IsJ /,rf I _ L P I 4 I ez CAHILL ROAD L • � � t .• . � �n h;� ^�rl oy. I a CONCRETE i Ij ll ' AMC/N:JSCA, At N-J° -I- — �x,r'� �,c,�,; �74- �� 1 i• ,I, . , , IR � � '1 -�' ._+.: .r a - � a_ rc i -vc 5.,rr a _ v. ;.•r v: �� /. j FJJ�• -_T • g,' 6 PROPOSPD NEW alJ14DING S • � OFFICEI WARENQU5F- Z� .a.. IS,OOD r' . � t_' I � C� *•" cv GJ�n'n EASErrEnT - - - � -1. yfI 517-: FLAN yuiE !'• _.. 4v.c. �a••or�o c..a B.a.`. mwn... CD FLOoQ- PL-AN 10 e 50, o" —,f,'. — — — ; I NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION IS [',ALL�AWNIN.. I � ..r. I j i l i U - -� - 1•e <r[NtiI�N JCINT —_ -_ — I��l. ___ _ I� I�._, N !K�EY TG •I V P[_FINL ED M.•T4L C2) FA[ -rc C2 `; ALL)M ROCS FLcw.T E4 1 O CS` 5TCNE FINISH 42.' S:ZCC., MA -OGCi ,J 2Q= FKL- MAY1+eY SOUTH ELEVATION EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS %•..• I.. • ; ••a •• ' , —) �� -- ••� -`� (' wEF Woos �......ISN[[ I � f Yw.+ M•W-`y I ',T l+[ T,T [T W C �./ ' F[[NIw'I.NIO a I I r[w t ) • C KIY�cT[V iVNr 9L['1[4L♦Nr [1IJ: IN[ua MM Ort�t �I)M LTI'<[[Q/Yr ♦ <f W rNra W•� I Y•, .NT V�NIfNT1 f. f.�l•w.114 ( 0 I I� Mg1y.er. M.u/ r N ORTH LL WALL- �`� . SOUTH WAL� EAST WALL`�TI7N THRU FRONT,EI :I `7•=v •�,nz OFFICF /WARFHniJI F RI 111f1RJ(-. i I I - _ �l WEST ELEVATION r, Itr� (n 'y /, REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland From: Craig Larsen Date: April 16, 1990 Subject: Second Reading, Ord. No. 825 -A34, Final Rezoning R -1, Single Family to PRD -2, Planned Residence District and Final Plat Approval for Clark 2nd Addition. Recommendation: Agenda Item #III. C, D, E. Consent Information Only Mgr.- Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion �X❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion A. Grant Second Reading of Ordinance to Repeal Heritage Preservation Overlay District, subject to final determination on development of historical marker. B. Grant Second Reading of Rezoning of Townhouse Development to PRD -2, pursuant to recommendation of Planning Commission. C. Approve Final Plat for Clarks 2nd Addition subject to: 1. Recorded conservation restriction on steep slopes of single family lots. 2. Subdivision dedication based on a raw land value of $1,800,000. 3. Developer's Agreement INFO /BACKGROUND When the Council granted preliminary approval on March 19, 1990, six issues were identified which were to be addressed prior to the granting of final approval. Listed below are the six issues including developer response and staff research on each issue. 1) Guest parking for townhouses. The developer believes, based on other similar projects, that adequate guest parking is provided. Also, additional surface- parking will - reduce landscaping and green areas Staff agrees with -this position. The Council however, may wish to impose a Proof -of- Parking Agreement r' to add spaces if it becomes necessary in the future. The proponent will illustrate the location of additional spaces at the Council meeting. 2) Grading plan to control runoff and erosion. The developer has submitted a grading and erosion control pan. This plan has been reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. The developer has also agreed to a conservation easement to permanently protect the steep slopes on the single family portion of the plat. 3) Emergency vehicle access. The site plan has been reviewed by the City Fire Department. Access for ambulance and fire trucks is accommodated.. 4) Concep-tual plan to commemorate the historical significance of the corner. Attached to this report are three concepts developed by the proponents architect. The concepts includes elements requested by the Park Department and Jim Finlayson of the Historical Society. All of the plans can be accommodated without changing the site plan for the townhouses. Following Council action these options will be considered by the Historical Society and the Heritage Preservation Board. Following this review we will return with a recommendation for development of the commemorative marker. 5) Lot 7, of the single family plat. Staff recommends approval of Lot 7 as presented. We believe approval of Lot 7 will not set a precedent. The shape of Lot 7 is a result of the shape and topography of the site. Development of this lot and adjacent lots will not create a neck lot situation where one home is constructed in what appears to be the rear yard of adjacent lots. Development will result is a typical side yard to side yard relationship. Private spaces and views will not be compromised by the, development. 6) Site lines at Village Drive. The City Engineering Department has reviewed the grading plan and has determined that this development will not cause a site line problem at the intersection. The Planning Commission considered Final Rezoning.plans for the townhouse, PRD -2 zoning at its March 28, 1990, meeting. These plans included final grading and utility plans and a landscaping plan and schedule. The site plan is unchanged from the plan given preliminary approval by the Council. The Commission recommends approval of the Final Rezoning Plans. DRAFT OF MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 28, 1990 Z -90 -1 Final Rezoning approval. Highcroft Townhomes. Ron Clark Construction Generally Located: Southwest corner of Cahill Road and Vest 70th Street Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the City Council, on March 19, 1990, voted unanimously-to grant preliminary approval for the subject development. The proponent has now returned with Final Development Plans for the 21 unit townhouse development. Mr. Larsen explained the number of units, location of buildings and size of . individual townhomes remains unchanged. The only change from previous plans is that lap siding has replaced stucco as an exterior material. Face brick continues as the other finish material. In support of their request, proponents have submitted a landscaping plan and schedule, a final grading plan and a utilities plan. Mr. Larsen pointed out the proposed landscaping plan exceeds ordinance requirements for both amount and size of landscaping material. The plan continues to show a thick conifer planting at the westerly end of the project, at the transition to the single family lots. The City's Engineering Department has reviewed and approved the utility and grading plans subject to a signed developers agreement. The Developers Agreement is to include an erosion control plan which is also subject to review and approval by Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Mr. Larsen concluded the Final Rezoning plans conform to those given preliminary, approval by the City Council. The Final Development Plan conforms to Ordinance requirements. Continuing, Mr. Larsen said staff recommends Final Rezoning Approval subject to: 1. Final Plat Approval 2. Developers Agreement 3. Subdivision Dedication 4. Final Council Action of Historic Designation Mr. Ron Clark, proponent, Ms. Nancy Horn and Mr. Michael Gair, representing Mr. Clark were present. Commissioner Workinger asked Mr. Larsen what the Parkland Dedication would be. Mr. Larsen said at this time he is not sure. The Council will 'make that decision on April 16, 1990. Commissioner Workinger questioned if the retaining wall has been reduced. Mr. Larsen answered that is correct, the wall has been reduced from what was previously submitted. Commissioner McClelland questioned if the driveway easement for lot 13 has been cleared up. Mr. Larsen said there is no driveway easement for lot 13. Lot 13 will have it's entrance off West 70th Street. Commissioner Palmer asked Mr. Larsen if they are approving the plat for single family homes and the rezoning for townhomes.' Mr. Larsen said what needs approval tonight is the rezoning for the townhomes. Mr. Gair explained to the Commission permits for the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District have been submitted since Council approval. Mr. Gair pointed out the grading plan has been revised and the retaining walls have been reduced from what was previously submitted. He clarified that Lot 13 would be accessed from West 70th Street. Commissioner L. Johnson told Mr. Gair he wants.-to see a park like atmosphere kept on the - -site. He added he wants to see the grading done carefully around the large oak trees so they are not damaged during construction. Mr. Gair said they have every intention of saving the oak trees. Mr. Gair said the oak trees are large white oaks, and grading will be carefully done in that area. Commissioner L. Johnson noted the deterioration of the retaining wall on Village Drive and asked what would be done with it. Mr. Gair said the retaining wall will be removed and grading down around the area. Commissioner Palmer moved to recommend final rezoning for the project, subject to the staff conditions. Commissioner Hale seconded the motion. Ayes, Hale, L. Johnson, Workinger, Shaw, Runyan, Palmer, G. Johnson. Nays' McClelland. Motion carried. Subdivision No. 5- / o " SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT TO: Planning Commission Park' Board Environmental Quality Commission FROM: Planning Department ,/+ SUBDIVISION NAME: H l..Ir�� J-C�tl 1Lj LAND SIZE: aT' 2 ( 7 ^� 7 Ca-f 5 LAND VALUE: . r (By: < ±- GJ Date The developer of this subdivision has been required to 0 A. grant an easement over part of the land ElB. dedicate % of the land C. donate $ as a fee in lieu of land As a result of applying the following policy: A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 5% of land dedicated) 1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition beneficially expands the park. El 2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park. 3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream. 4. If property is necessary for storm water holding or will be dredged or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds. r7 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his- toric value. F1 6. B. Cash Required 1. In all other instances than above. j� 2. IJ `+ P+4 LOhIC. eGccAt- PROPOSED SITE A PROS 1. Side A was the corner of original site of the first building constructed for the Irish community. 2. It gives the visitor good visibility to all areas that have historic significance. 3. Parking would be close to viewing area if the commercial space was utilized. Sidewalk could run from parking directly to tee. No street crossing would be necessary. 4. Buses could pull into commercial parking area for unloading and boarding. S. Individual parking would be available from office building and shopping center. 6. Ample circulation space around monument for groups such as school children. 7. Commercial property lends itself to public use more easily than residential property. 8. Easy to spot from Cahill or 70th Street. CONS 1. Need approval from owner's of old Kings Court building. I 1 P1 - rltl� PROPOSED SITE B PROS 1. Original corner of St. Patricks church. 2. Front end of Highcroft development not in residence's back yards. CONS 1. Limited circulation space around monument for visitors. 2. Parking would need to be either across the street or on Village Drive. 3. No place for buses to load and unload. 4. Public use of private residential property. 5. Limited space, due to the need to heavily screen homes with landscaping to provide some privacy from 70th and Cahill traffic. St. Patrick's Catholic Church, circa 1906 —The Cahill District in southwest Edina was first settled by Irish immigrants in the 1850's. The intersection of Cahill Road and West 70th Street was the heart of the Cahill District. In 1864 the settlers erected the Cahill School, which also served as a meeting place for St. Patrick's Catholic Church. Twenty years later, they erected this church on the southwest corner of the intersection at 7000 Cahill Road. It was destroyed by lightning in 1924 and the present structure on the site was built. In 1961 a larger sanctuary was completed at 6779 Valley View Road and the congrega- tion moved to its present quarters. St. Patrick's Catholic Church, circa 1890 —The members of St. Patrick's Catholic Church turned to face the photographer at the rear of the church in this early view of the congregation. This was the second church to serve this congregation. The original church was a log cabin structure that stood on the northwest corner of Wooddale Avenue and West 70th Street. Built in 1884, the second church was located on the southwest corner of Cahill Road and Valley View Road until it was destroyed by lightning in 1924. 7 1°i�► � G' �GTI cN G . PROPOSED SITE C PROS 1. Loanding and unloading spaces for buses on Village Drive. 2. Easy to spot from Cahill. CONS 1. Limited circulation space with retaining walls and landscaping buffer to create privacy for residents and to block views to industrial buildings. 2. Not easy to spot from 70th Street. 3. Majority of parking is located across the street. O 4. Limited visibility to other historic sites. 5. Public use of private residential property. 6. Possible problems with general public using Highpoint Condominiums or Highcroft Townhomes parking. J c k� ��CHCfDP7 -' --------- ------ U IU •,e.r e,syt� ILrl ^ � lam: —t•'• - - — •G •sre 114eD' s_.. OF r fig, If.,Buoe U I b ' C3 l �' ■ I ..io aoD4 , 12• L 13 I.r.•j]V� M iu.) T BOCK YI U Q - W 0th STREET Mir• r6 �r�s������� - -.�.� HIGHCROFT TOWNNOMES f 10 0,41L il lei p 0i , �l� B` P/ Q I I R�� J /iQy" I 11. 10. / II / {i� 1 \ R I 119 LcD° ZJ TODP VILLAGE DR. l \ I CIrcle *'� 8. It iF J� F1 Lot Tabulation II I I m loon `_iLio_ eui® Ulu IM I —•••I en leaf `DoYsloOment Summery j • n' e' — HIGHCROFT HIGHCROFT TOWNHONES .�. / SRIOIa /ArllY ACRE 6.e AC TOMMNOr[ ACRES 4.2 AC '/ : IY Ile' we Ir rr.rM i SINGLE, FAMILY LOT AR1 EA OF 7.6 AC TOwNNOY! LOTS 2s Lora II ,Y. OP YP w '• rs 00 SIT! OUTLOT • I R.O.A. 0.6 AC TOMMNOM! UNITS 79 r 'I In' Ile• Nr' w If.+N I 10% OF SITE SITE AREA PER UNIT 7402 50. FT. I) lu" Ile' fn• rl 'S.F. LOT] 12 LOTS LO :T AMA PER UNIT 2400 SO. FT. In• Ila' fY' le If.+Y 01. LOT SIZE 1°.600 SOFT. GUILDMG AREA 2150.5 60. FT. MAR LOT S12! 42.400 SO.FT. BUILDING COVERAGE 20.0% I MEDIAN IDT 21.700 SO. FT. USIAOLE SITE AREA PER .400 $0. FT ZONED R -1 ITS REZONES 11D PRD -2 Sa IEACR 2TANOAR0e.NEIOMeeOOAM000 9414ACR w,uN,aRD4 — � I ee4wt 0.R0Y• ,a eM R Y2DIA I•»e I »0) •e- / :q 01Rele N' •. Ae 0YY.1 0)1001 Ae' .ORgA W 1.1 001IR - . 1Y4 0Y e1� /•' .....' .......... »><. a •» •• RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION GROSS DENSITY 1.3 UN /AC GROSS DENSITY So UN /AC 5114 lDINA INOYe TRIAL BLVD. [DIRA. ON Ba42e _ —" 4 m�1 trr A CLARK'S 2nd ADDITION :7ATE' VFJ 4Rl4T 01 NORTH 0 2e eo foo lao F[! IV I I , EP�.oN WHIZO�. Y I �f c V are IM CO" TR CnaM sur aw.E 2 cr a (ttw.nt.l W - "A Cwt1M u �r d 5.THW. fL Z _ _ 1 mow• _ \ _ W. 01h STREET •sre n�a r•• Q VV = f /� %� • 9' /�/ / / - VILLAGE DR. I /I \ Mlph . •�•`ci _ '/ / -� II III // -9 Fl, FT FFFFJ �. •� Clrel / I � • I f F -.-I I Il] LLUI / •rra - rtwry!a won sw.nv. v V- -9,: r.ny 6EUw..nW —em — eu5nut. rnJrouo_ `'• `'� ' arOxc�r,o 81 LO 7 1. I 1 GRADING PLAN - ' & EROSION CONTROL PLAN RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION ' `i.a •� i —_ 6114 EDINA IMOUBTRIAI uv0. y j I D4E: ¢FV i -rolo emttA, r,t s8438 „a! � 0 28 so too 1°O Ful r rr ♦ v r _w VILLAGE DRIVE �� I I PLANT SCHEDULE KEY QM COMMON MAMA (OTAMICALIYAML NLS Mawr aO4 11 9UCOZL M M 1 Ole I—k M MALSMALL:S ASN rLAYlMti f`R"K'MAiammALIWt*1 /1e LIN It Ciw\1 194 LIMOLM TLIA cwmlA'aa[aNirl[a' in' /1e R MEMO e[TAL aw.L 10 6IMMIS MONSVI.D AT GLAPITMA TtIA.'SKYLINa' a *' ele Palm O rl" 0►i. 6LIaKVS rALV[TL/S iA' e10 Mr u MOLWw "Ma rINUs LLM1INOa 10 MA IAIN! 140f SO MO.I~ "Na r11Nli weLIMOM C• la CO14w00 (warm Y[+KL rhos^ r7MafiM3 y ='SL COS K COLCOAOO 6996M Srs r a pica^ ram"" O' sae _- AM to AMUL MAR.a A XO. 41MMN.h a' Me. RSC is Lao %fta OM CaAVCRa MAUla 'aa0 SRA"WW i' SAW AC 7 AMU. 0" raa[sY faUNLN. MAAKI L' sae -- WJ It WILLMI JUNIM4. JIINIr"us atM 11OL1N' A' sae a!J M OfA [fAN1 J.'1 JAnA[.O1 LMIM. -\ aMAN' IL' r r .. "i -.P m[lANal ,AMI/aA• K .IUNIf[LIK NMIL'M4AN' la' fCf v[w In VAMICa[. /iD W[IaeLw wYA�'I!� ■ VAMltalu 74 I'm Zj ADM al AM\R OWAM MA*%& AL[L iINNA/l.'(IMrKTA' i1' rOr _ _••_ WE N W"Mv MIO/IYM1ri eUOrMKUS ALnays G' IbT CAO b COMrALT AFIQ.IC'AM C,'beew Na[ma1A TLItOalsm 'CA�1fILT►: 74• I'M � �_�_�� / I.WO 60 AMTIOIrf vwa[ /[L st, 41PIA" 1115M.LA 'AW.' le• Im ALL as ALfIMa CUfaAaf{ LIOas ALRMUM IL' fbT aMN 9O "Itaft MON40 OI -AX a 10 Me IOmICd/. 1M ASTP[1' MAIN' Iw' fOr POT 37 AOe&T-.W000 nnsmres � PbTwwrnLA rL.'MeO7MIlam'le' Ibr q .�.� •.���� IlOiil: 1) ALL LlWM AKA^ TO be {0 00[0 ' fl ML SOOOfO a Lmp..CNN AM -M M-4 Itw16M7K11 7YSTEK. -�- -`�" -- ' a) Au /aTINNes V TO WE eelae LOL ►rm& "Yvrone, aLLv"Io /Y. ll N MN A) lOC7-'WM IM SN[W 5W APIP"N't10 al[LoINfATO el PM LII!\IPI[ (I%'#). I— [riAlL. S)l M0.1N IM 4N /Ve tws Aww raOM el[LPNK TO Be a•Llw[L -Avem® W.A aim LAMvsC m rmelC, ViI-L [Oaf/_. VILLAGE DRIVE �� I I C� SIDE RAMER SIDE ELEVATION - TWO STORY FRONT ELEVATION - RAMBLER _ —_ - .___ - -- FRONT ELE_VATION_- TWO STORY_ -_ 5z y m N N T E4 O �N c- C W zcv isT w Y u 11iJ a Z C) E-+ . U o N E— N co m O xo� 04 z �-r SHEF'7 OF � | � | ) / � | |< | | . ------ --- | | | � | ) \ \ / / sressr - — '� «�� 1==0=v =OT °==`=.^ ,.."= —1~~1.. ~~— .~~ MIGHCROFT TOWNHOME5 nnw cL*nn cuwnrnocr/nw � --_�-_�--_-_-_- 0 - ' � ! fft�� 0 5 30 60 GRADING DRAINAGE Pi Agenda Item III.C.D.E April 11, 1990 Torence L. Becker 5532 West 70th Street Edina, Minnesota 55439 Mayor Richards and City Council, This letter is in regards to the City Council meeting of March 19, 1990. At this meeting a pre - approval was given to developer Ron Clark for a single family and townhome development at West 70th Street and Cahill Road. I was not only amazed, but appalled by the City Council's lack of concern with the 152 + signed documents of disapproval submitted by your south- west Edina constituents. Also, the "non - approval" vote submitted to you by our own City Rlannina, Cosinission was seemingly discounted as the pre - approval was given Mr. Clark. I have lived in Edina all my life and for the past four years in the home my wife and I purchased at: 5532 W. 70th St. ( directly across from the pre- approved townhome development). I really thought I understood what the Edina city government's philosophv was on development in regards to its impact on the single family neighborhood, but after the March 19th meeting, I can see that philosophy has been altered dramatically. Mr. Everson and Mr. Clark can sound their horns about what a "wonderful thing" they are doing for our neighborhood, but that is GARBAGE! What they really care about is what our neighborhood can do for their bank accounts! That is the end of their service to our West 70th Street single family neighborhood. Hasn't Mr. Everson already proven that by purchasing the school property on the contention of running a school there only to turn around and sell the property for an unbelievable profit - a profit by all rights, if to be gained at all, should have gone into the city's bank account? Frankly, I have no problem with the planned single family homes, they sound very attractive and like those who support Mr. Clark's townhome plan, if my .come backed up to one of these pricey single family homes - he'd have my support too! Well, my home is directly affected by the townhome developmnet and Mr. Clark does NOT have my support! Is it to much to ask that the density of this development be cut from 21 units to 16 units? Is it to much to ask that our elected officials start getting tough with developers and start getting back to the philosophies that.made Edina such a wonderful family community? I hope you will give this some serious thought before you give your final approval to the Ron Clark development proposed for West 70th Street and Cahill Road. I assure you I will be thinking about it everytime I look out my livingroom windows. Remember, the world is only as perfect as we decide to make it. Sincerely, i i[lG sy 1.Y. Aalley-31a y L 4204 J164 916 load Ainneapol's, Aff55416 (612) 926- 7981 April 12, 1990 CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55439 SUBJ: Cahill and 70th development To Whom It May Concern: Agenda Item III.C.D.E. Home Address: 5426 Creek View Lane I have not been happy with the zoning and development in West Edina, paticularly the 70th and Cahill area. Since I have heard of this development and I see the nastalgic school house and the green it is hard to vision'a glut of townhomes on that corner. They are over priced and will be slow selling as the units on Cahill road. I strongly believe if you allow this redevelopment you are grossly misrepresenting the citizens of Edina and our area. Sincerely, m. Ri ey CC: Steve Smithson 3e,9.. -7.A 6#,,: 624 X. Cl..16nd -7e, . .7a11s, -#X5-6537 218% 736 -6084 t A. ' B 'N�R!'ON�`�tiO • ' iaBB REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland From: Craig Larsen Date: April 16, 1990 Subject: Z -90 -3, P -90 -3 Rezoning and Final Development Plan PCD -4, Planned Commercial District to PCD -2, Plan Commercial District. Walgreens by Semper Holdings, Inc. 4916 France Avenue South Recommendation: Agenda Item # III. F. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr : _ Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Approval of Preliminary Rezoning and Final Development Plan request with the following conditions: 1. Narrowing of 49 1/2 Street egress from 20' to 12'; 2. Approval of landscape plan; 3. Payment of public parking assessment ($10,700) prior to. receipt of building permit; 4. Final Rezoning. Info /Background: The proposal suggests the removal of the existing Mobile Service Station and the reconstruction of a brick 11,300 square foot (basement and first floor) Walgreens Drug Store. The proposal meets ordinance requirements except for parking. The Planning Commission reviewed the parking variance and recommended approval. Sixteen parking stalls are provided on site, as well as the use of public facilities. Approximately $10,700 would be assessed to the property to help pay the cost of providing public parking consistent with current H.R.A. policy. Please refer to attached Planning Commission minutes and staff report. DRAFT OF THE MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 28, 1990 Z -90 -3 PCD -4, Planned Commercial District to PCD -2, Planned Commercial District. Walgreen's by Semper Holdings, Inc. 4916 France Avenue South Generally Located: Northwest corner of France Avenue and West 49 1/2 Street Mr. Larsen - informed the.Commission the subject property is zoned PC -4 and is developed with a Mobil Oil gas station. The PC -4 zone is limited to gas stations, car washes and automobile service centers. Mr. Larsen added the gross site area is 18,917 square feet. Mr. Larsen explained a petition has been submitted to rezone the property from PC -4 to PC -2, Planned Commercial District. PC -2, is the general retail rezoning carried by most properties in the 50th and France Commercial District. The existing gas station would be removed and in its place a Walgreens Drug Store would be constructed. The store would contain 8,300 square feet of lst floor retail space with a 3,000 square foot basement storage area. Mr. Larsen asked the Commission to note that exterior materials would be face brick. Mr. Larsen pointed out in a Planned Commercial District building and parking setbacks are required only from a property line which is a boundary of the district. In this case setbacks are required only from the north property line. The proposed redevelopment provides the required 10 foot parking setback and exceeds the required 25 foot building setback. The proposed building has a gross floor area of 11,300 square feet, which includes a 3,000 square foot basement storage area. The Zoning Ordinance requires 70 parking spaces for a retail building of this size. The proposed site plan would provide 16 on -site parking spaces. Thus, a 54 space parking variance is requested. Mr. Larsen added in 1977 the HRA adopted a policy which allows expansions and the redevelopment of properties within the commercial area. The policy allows the use of public parking facilities to support buildings with a floor area ratio-of 1.0 or less. The proposed building has a floor area of 0.6. Thus, it conforms to current HRA policies regarding expansions. Mr. Larsen told the Commission all commercial properties in the 50th and France Commercial Area were assessed a portion of the cost of public parking facilities. Some were charged on existing floor area, assuming no expansion, others were assessed for expansion potential. This property was not assessed for expansion potential. It has been City -HRA policy to assess for expansion based upon net addition demand placed on public parking facilities. In this case approximately $10,700 would be assessed to help pay the cost of providing public parking. Mr. Larsen concluded the proposed plan is the smaller of two prototype floor plans being developed in the area for Walgreens. Typically, the stores have between 15 and 25 parking spaces. With the 16 spaces provides and the availability of public parking nearby, we believe parking has been adequately addressed. We recommend approval of the parking variance. The building and its finish materials and design are compatible with the 50th and France Design Framework. Continuing, Mr. Larsen said staff believes the store will be a plus to retail activity along 49 1/2 Street. Staff recommends approval of the rezoning subject to: 1. Final Rezoning 2. Approval of landscaping along north property line. 3. 'Payment of public parking assessment prior to receipt of building permit. Commissioner Runyan asked Chairman Johnson to note that he is abstaining from discussion or the vote on this item. Mr. John Coiler, of the Runyan and Vogel Group was present representing Semper Holdings•(Walgreens). Chairman G Johnson asked why there is only one entrance into the store and observed that all the parking is located on the backside of the building, by the apartments. Mr. Larsen said it was at the suggestion of City Staff that the building be located near the street, relating to pedestrian traffic, he acknowledged that it may be inconvenient for people parking their cars and having to walk around the building to enter, but staff wanted the streetscape to remain consistent with the rest of the 50th streetscape. Mr. Larsen added regarding the residents of the apartment building, they may prefer to view the open space of the parking lot instead of building mass. Chairman Johnson suggested the possibility of turning the building at a 90 degree angle, thus solving some of those concerns. Commissioner McClelland said she agreed with Chairman G. Johnson that there may be a need for another door. She expressed concern that if the building is hard to access, in a few years the building could be vacant. Commissioner L. Johnson asked where the deliveries would be made, and pointed out if the deliveries are in the rear there could be a conflict between the delivery truck and patrons for the drug store. Commissioner L. Johnson also pointed out that the drive aisle does not have to be as wide as it is depicted. He recommended if the drive aisle is reduced there would be more open space for adding low vegetation. Mr. Coiler introduced himself.and informed the Commission deliveries to the store are scheduled on a once per -week basis, deliveries are on Monday morning between 9:00 a.m. and 11:00 a.m. He added a conflict with patrons and the delivery truck should not be a problem. Mr. Coiler added that the delivery truck is not a semi -truck but a van type of truck. Continuing, Mr. Coiler told the Commission Walgreens will have a 20 year lease on the building. He pointed out Walgreens does not have a store in Edina and is very excited about establishing a store in this community. Mr. Coiler explained that Walgreens does a large volume of work for HMO's and feels there is a need for this type of store in the area. Mr. Coiler pointed out that the design of the store is situated toward 50th and France and will be similar to the Stansfield Building. In response to Chairman Johnson's and Commissioner McClellands concern about one entrance he explained the store will focus on the streetscape of 50th and France and pedestrian traffic that will use the ramp and walkways. Commissioner Shaw asked Mr. Coiler if the underground gas tanks would be removed from the site. Mr. Coiler said that the tanks would be removed. Commissioner Workinger told Mr. Coiler that he feels there should be a rear door on the store and possibly windows to break up the line of the building in the rear. Mr. Workinger suggested that there also could be a security problem in not being able to view the rear parking lot. Mr. Coiler explained that located along the rear wall of the store will be the pharmacy and shelving. He added Walgreens does not want easy access to the drugs that will be stored in this area, therefore no windows are proposed. He added the wall will be broken up with brick detailing and security lighting. The security lighting will be aimed downward into the lot so residents in the apartment will not be bothered by the lighting. Commissioner L. Johnson noted that 49 1/2 street is a one -way out and the width of the proposed drive aisle at 20 feet may invite a left hand turn into the parking lot. This could be prevented if the drive aisle is necked down, allowing the truck area to be widened and landscape materials could then be added to an 8 foot area along the corner of the building. Mr. Coiler said he has no problem with Commissioner L. Johnson's suggestions, adding that it is a good idea. Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Larsen if the City has any observations about traffic and stacking at the lights at 49 1/2 and France. Mr. Larsen said his experience at that intersection shows there is not a problem with vehicles stacking. Commissioner McClelland said she agrees with Mr. Larsen's observation adding the highest number of cars stacking she has observed at that intersection has been three to four. She said traffic seems to flow very well there. Mr. Larsen noted that traffic consultants said a drug store type use will generate less traffic than the gas station. Commissioner McClelland said if her memory is correct there used to be a drug store on the Minneapolis side of 50th and France. Mr. Larsen said that is correct, it is now a B. Dalton and the prescription part of that operation moved down a couple of doors. Marge Buss, 4500 Wooddale, told the Commission she, along with her husband, own the Edina Pharmacy, which used to be located where the B. Dalton is and now has relocated down a few doors as just a professional pharmacy. She added she has a good thriving business and just wanted the Commission to know who she is. Commissioner Hale moved to recommend approval subject to the staff conditions and the recommendation that the driveway at 49 1/2 street be amended from the proposed 20 feet to 12 feet thus allowing more space for landscaping and truck delivery. Commissioner Shaw seconded the motion. Ayes; Hale, McClelland, L. Johnson, Palmer, Shaw, Workinger, G. Johnson. Mr. Runyan abstained. The motion carried. el A d [01 k, = ii F 0 ��mM Ti' h_ M h_ [ )M' .,mIim I� 4 :JVA • DINA PLANNING DEPAH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MARCH 28, 1990 Z -90 -3 PCD -4, Planned Commercial'District to PCD -2, Planned Commercial District. Walgreen's by Semper Holdings, Inc. 4916 France Avenue South Generally Located: Northwest corner of France Avenue and West 49 1/2 Street The subject property is zoned PC -4 and is developed with a Mobil Oil gas station. The PC -4 zone is limited to gas stations, car washes and automobile service centers. The gross site area is 18,917 square feet. A petition has been submitted to rezone the property from PC -4 to PC -2, Planned Commercial District. PC -2, is the general retail rezoning carried by most properties in the 50th and France Commercial District. The existing gas station would be removed an in its place a Walgreens Drug Store would be constructed. The store would contain 8,300 square feet of 1st floor retail space with a 3,000 square foot basement storage area. Exterior materials would be face brick. In a Planned Commercial District building and parking setbacks are required only from a property line which is a boundary of the district. In this case setbacks are required only from the north property line. The proposed redevelopment provides the required 10 foot parking setback and exceeds the required 25 foot building setback. The proposed building has a gross floor area.of 11,300 square feet, which includes a 3,000 square foot basement storage area. The Zoning Ordinance requires 70 parking spaces for a retail building of this size. The proposed site plan would provide 16 on -site parking spaces. Thus, a 54 space parking variance is requested. However, in 1977 the HRA adopted a policy which allow expansions and redevelopment of properties within the commercial area. The policy allows the,use of public parking facilities to support buildings with a floor area ratio of 1.0 or less. The proposed building has a floor area of 0.6. Thus, it conforms to current HRA policies regarding expansions. All commercial properties in the 50th and France Commercial Area were assessed a portion of the cost of public parking facilities. Some were charged on existing floor area, assuming no expansion, others were assessed for expansion potential. This property was not assessed for expansion potential. It has been City -HRA policy to assess for expansion based upon net addition demand placed on public parking facilities. In this case approximately $10,700 would be assessed to help pay the cost of providing public parking. Recommendation The proposed plan is the smaller of two prototype floor plans being developed in the area for Walgreens. Typically, the stores have between 15 and 25 parking spaces. With the 16 spaces provides and the .availability of public parking nearby, we believe parking has been adequately addressed. We recommend approval of the parking variance. The building and its finish materials and design are compatible with the 50th and France Design Frameowrk. We believe the store will be a plus to retail activity along 49 1/2 Steeet. Staff recommends approval of the rezoning subject to: 1.. Final Rezoning 2. Approval of landscaping along north property line. 3. Payment of public parking assessment prior to receipt of building permit. IRS] Flook BASEMENT FLOOR 'SOUTH ELEVATION .. . ....... I W11"o, ■IN%, I ■ I im��r-t PH _ n 13 PRF F041SI 1117 ME IAL CAP FLASHING •FACE BRICK •At 0� 4 FRAMf W, I "Sul. GI ASS &MAL COLUMN COVERS RS LREIFF41SHED TAL CAP I PREFINISHED ME FAL COLUMN COVERS [IRST FLOOR L EAST ELEVATION PREFN15HED METAL CAI' FLASHING FACE BRICK NORTH ELEVATION FACE BRICK ALUM FRAME W/ 1* INSUC GLASS ��'�11!l��[! im��r-t PH _ n FACE BRICK ALUM FRAME W/ 1* INSUC GLASS It 141 BASEMENT F�--9 WEST ELEVATION BASEMEN] FLOOR m ion r. PROPOSED BUILDING FOR WALGREENS EDINA, MINNESOTA ----------- YIYwYYYY .... ......... . It 141 BASEMENT F�--9 WEST ELEVATION BASEMEN] FLOOR m ion r. PROPOSED BUILDING FOR WALGREENS EDINA, MINNESOTA EXISTING APT BLIUDNG PROPERTY IINC r / �- �s\f �..j- su_ — d �. nislrx:n,vuus( 1 Is nn 1. C LL )o 0—(��- o 0 _ k o- Xg( F�' C o 1 11'11,[ EXISTING BLIILDNG i � 1e,sn LNUOSUI F ° I ) HC 0 LU N Z PROPOSED! WALGRE ENS BUILDING _ W j MSTNGIBUIL -DNG I = u LL tI BASEMENT - - I cnr IILm a,ao,n, . l -) C- 1-1-1 51A. -lU 111 ' PROPERTY LINE 20 n' 1 49 112 STREET WEST r, lJ SITE PLAN PROJECT INFORMATION tX151wr, tL3NwG - I•l -.1 ZONING RtQUESTID - PC2 SIIT AREA - 18,917 SF .434 ACRES BUIIDING SIZE - FIRST FLOOR - 8,300 SF BASEMENT - 3,000 SF PARKING PROVIDED - 16 CARS BUILDING SETBACK - NURIII PROPERIY LINE - 217 PARKING SETBACK - • NORTH PROPERTY INC - 10' (1), NOR 111 o S to Su 1u scas � nl1 I�u` eM11•SSICfI Cfe}P M. cr PROPOSED BIBU3NG FOR WAI_GRF_ENS EDINA. MINNESOTA SITE PLAN 'i a e tt Cn saes REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland From: Craig Larsen Date: April 16, 1990 Subject: Z -90 -4, S -90 -2, R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District to PRD -2, Planned Residence Dis- trict for Schaefer Development, Preliminary Plat Approval for Shadow Hill. Recommendation: Agenda Item # III. G. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr.-- Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion The Planning Commission recommends preliminary rezoning and preliminary plat approval for the proposed development subject to: 1. Final Rezoning; 2. Final Plat Approval; 3. Subdivision Dedication; 4. Engineering specifications for retaining walls. Info /Background: As.part of the development the proponent is requesting a reallocation of special assessments levied against this property. Currently, approximately $245,000 is levied against a single parcel. The reallocation would equally divide the total into 12 assessments against the proposed individual lots. The assessments would be satisfied as the lots are developed. Mr. Wilson proposes the reassess- ment to be for a five year period with interest remaining at the current 11J %. The initial assessment was for 10 years with three years remaining. The request would result in a two year extention of the assessment. Please refer to the attached letter from Steve Wilson of Schaefer Development. I DRAFT OF MINUTES.OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 28, 1990. Z -90 -4 R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District to PRD -2, Planned Residence District. Schaefer Development rL - S -90 -2 Preliminary Plat Approval. Shadow Hill. Schaefer Development Mr. Larsen explained to the Commission the subject property is zoned R -2 and is platted with five double bungalow lots. Prior to the current zoning the Commission and Council approved a PRD -2 zoning for 15 townhouse units. Both of these concepts failed in the marketplace. Mr. Larsen told the Commission a rezoning petition has been received for a PRD -2 zoning to allow for the construction of 12 "detached" townhomes. The development concept is new to Edina. It combines elements of single family detached housing with elements of townhouse design and management. Each unit will have an individual private lot, making it work like many small lot single family neighborhoods in the City. The units, however, will have common design and materials with a townhouse type association for maintenance. Mr. Larsen pointed out the units are planned as one -story units with all living spaces on one floor measuring approximately 1600 square feet. Each unit has an attached two -car garage. Exterior materials would be wood siding with brick accents. The proposed development complies with all ordinance requirements except for the side yard setback on Lot 12. A 10 foot setback is provided where a 20 foot setback is required. Thus, a 10 foot sideyard setback variance is requested. Mr. Larsen concluded that this is a very difficult site to develop. The combination of the hill on the north side and freeway to the south are very limiting. In the last couple years two different development concepts have failed. This proposal may have a better chance to succeed than the previous proposals. Primarily because the offering price will be lower, acknowledging the sites limitations. Mr. Larsen said staff believes the proposal has merit and should receive preliminary approval subject to the following conditions. 1'. Final Rezoning 2. Final Plat 3. Subdivision Dedication 4. Engineering Specifications for Retaining Wall Mr. Steve Wilson, proponent was present. Chairman G. Johnson asked to have noted that he will abstain from the vote. Commissioner Runyan asked Mr. Wilson if the proposed units would have a basement. Mr. Wilson responded that they would be constructed with a basement. Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Wilson to explain the pricing of the units and the marketability. Mr. Wilson told the Commission each unit would be constructed with a full basement with light wells to create more light in the basement, therefore a more appealing living area. He added the units would have the advantages of communal living along with the privacy of single family living. Mr. Wilson said he believes these units will appeal to empty nesters, single, and professional couples, and be in the price range of 170's +. Mr. Wilson told the Commission it is his opinion that the units should be priced competitively to offset the.negitive impact a highway has on property. Continuing, Mr. Wilson said he plans to develop a small sound wall that will add character and containment to the project. He indicated the units would be constructed with a variety of building materials, brick, cedar, and stucco with a location change in the entrances so each unit maintains an individual character. Commissioner Hale questioned the maintenance on the property, i.e., snow removal, grass cutting, water sprinkling, etc. Mr. Wilson said the property would be maintained by the association and a sprinkler system would be installed. Mr. Wilson clarified that each lot would be individually owned. Commissioner Hale asked if all the properties would be constructed at one time or on an as sold basis. Mr. Wilson said one unit would be constructed as a model, toward the middle, and as the units are sold, construction would take place. Commissioner Workinger asked Mr. Wilson Wilson said the retaining walls will be feet and sloping down again to nothing. treated timbers, all walls will have the and be anchored. the height of the retaining walls. Mr. constructed from 6 inches high up to 15 The walls would be constructed of 6.X 6 approval of the engineering department Commissioner L. Johnson asked if any retaining walls spill onto adjacent properties. Mr. Wilson responded that all walls would be contained on the site. Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Wilson if the retaining walls could be terraced. Mr. Wilson said that it is his plan to terrace the higher walls. Commissioner McClelland questioned how many feet would be between the units and the retaining walls. Mr. Wilson answered from the dwelling unit to the retaining wall the distance would be around 30 feet. Commissioner L. Johnson asked Mr. Wilson with this concept. Mr. Wilson responded proposed to develop detached townhomes. with a development project of townhomes good market for the proposal. Commissioner Runyan asked Mr. Wilson the said the distance between dwelling units proposed units are only one story units of openness will be created. if he has ever constructed a project that this is the first time he has Mr. Wilson added he was very successful in Edina and feels that this area is a distance between units. Mr. Wilson will be 16 feet. He pointed out the and with 16 feet between them a feeling Commissioner McClelland questioned where Mr. Wilson proposes to place the sound wall. Mr. Wilson said he proposes to place the,sound wall off the site, adding he has approval from -the state to place a fence type wall on state right -of way, with the state having the understanding that they will not pay for the wall. Mr. Joe Eton, resident of Vernon Woods told the Commission he does not oppose the proposal but wants the Commission to make sure the project is done correctly and that all taxes are brought up to date. Mr. Eton said he wants the Commission to make sure the hill is not touched and the buffer of vegetation is maintained. Commissione-r L. Johnson asked Mt. Wilson if he will save as much vegetation as possible. Mr. Wilson said it is his plan to clear just what needs to be cleared and to maintain as much vegetation as possible. Commissioner L. Johnson asked if Mr. Wilson has a landscaping plan. Mr. Wilson said he has a landscaping plan. Commissioner McClelland expressed some caution regarding this development. She noted this has been a very difficult site to develop and has a bad history for proposals "not flying" She questioned what would happen if the property only became partially developed. Mr. Wilson said he has researched the market and is confident this proposal will work. He added he will construct the first unit in the middle of the project and then develop it in either direction. Mr. Wilson said he understands Commissioner McClellands concern but reiterated his confidence in the project. Commissioner Hale questioned if Lot 13 would have a conservation easement. Mr. Larsen responded that it would. Commissioner Palmer moved to recommend approval of the proposed development subject to staff conditions. Mr. Hale seconded the motion. Ayes, Hale, McClelland, L. Johnson, Palmer, Runyan, Workinger, Shaw. Chairman Johnson abstained. The motion carried. ,$Ichaefer VELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION, LTD. 2581 Co. Rd. 74 (Old Hwy. 15) St. Cloud, Minnesota 56301 (612) 252.7345 April 11, 1990 Edina City Council Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Ridgeview Hills Detached Townhomes Dear City Council Members: Schaefer Development is proposing to develop twelve detached townhomes on the property located north of Vernon Court and East of Vernon Avenue. The home will be thirty two feet wide containing approximately 1600 square feet on lots typically having 54 feet of roadway frontage. The design of the home will be one story, offering a living room, dining room, kitchen, formal dining area, master bedroom suite, master bath, bedroom /den, guest bathroom and laundry room on one level. The interior will feature ten foot walls, vaulted /volume ceilings, skylights and fireplace. The exterior will be built with a combination of brick and cedar siding. The streetscape will vary through the use of both hip and gable end roof types, detail changes in the elevations and garage doors able to be placed on either the front or side of the home. The base price,of the home will be approximately $175,000.00 The property has had two other proposals previously approved by the City. The first one consisted of 15 townhomes in four buildings. Each two story townhome was 32 feet wide with 20 feet between buildings. The second proposal was designed for 5 two story twin homes with 20 feet between each of these buildings. Schaefer Development's proposal improves upon the previously approved plans by reducing the mass of the buildings through the use of one story buildings instead of two story units. Also, by separating each unit, there becomes a landscaped greenspace between each unit, providing for a larger number and more frequent visual breaks through the development. In addition to the issues of rezoning and subdivision I also wish for you to consider the method of allocation and payment of Page 2 special assessments which have been levied against the property. Hennepin County currently shows approximately $205,000.00 in special assessments, interest and penalties on this property from previous years. The County, at the request of the City of Edina, will remove this amount from the property tax statement. The amount of $205,000.00 plus the future payments for special assessments in the amount of approximately $40,000.00 for a total of approximately $245,000.00 can then be divided equally over the twelve proposed lots. The responsibility for collection of this special assessment on each lot can be returned to the County, with payments made over a five year term and interest continuing to accrue at an 11 1/2 % annual rate. This plan provides no less security for the City of Edina in the collection of the amount owed to the City for the installation of the public improvements on Vernon Court. It does provide what seems to be a fair and equitable way for each lot to assume responsibility for improvements to each. Thank you for your favorable consideration. Sincerely, Steve Wilson Real Estate Development.Officer SW:smr LOCATION MAP /VE - - - - -- - -- - - -. - - APEL MILL - ;FORD CT. FOUNTAIN -WOOD ATIONAL' APT$ < )INA WEST. APT'S F '� • - ` 1 .�7 REZONING & SUBDIVISION NUMBER Z -90 -4 and S -90 -2 L O C A T 10 N Vernon Court (north side of Vernon Court) REQUEST Construct a 12 Unit Detached GL •r ' .. - ..,i . :; ate., ., •, ••ti 'ter �i .1 �:. y �. GRflt ���,t'= / Ei T M ""`:' LL REZONING & SUBDIVISION NUMBER Z -90 -4 and S -90 -2 L O C A T 10 N Vernon Court (north side of Vernon Court) REQUEST Construct a 12 Unit Detached Townhouse Development EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MARCH 28, 1990 Z -90 -4 R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District to PRD -2, Planned Residence District. Schaefer Development M S -90 -2 Preliminary Plat Approval. Shadow Hill. Schaefer Development The subject property is zoned R -2 and is platted with five double bungalow lots. Prior to the current zoning the Commission and Council approved a PRD -2 zoning for 15 townhouse units. Both of these concepts failed in the marketplace. A rezoning petition has been received for a PRD -2 zoning to allow for the construction of 12 "detached" townhoues. The development concept is new to Edina. It combines elements of single family detached housing with elements of townhouse design and management. Each unit will have an individual private lot, making it work like many small lot single family neighborhoods in the City. The units, however, will have common design and materials with a townhouse type association for maintenance. The units are planned as one -story units with all living spaces on one floor measuring approximately 1600 square feet. Each unit has an attached two -car garage. Exterior materials would be wood siding with brick accents. The proposed development complies with'all ordinance requirements except for the side yard setback on Lot 12. A 10 foot setback is provided where a 20 foot setback is required. Thus, a 10 foot sideyard setback variance is requested. Recommendation This is a very difficult site to develop. The combination of the hill on the north side and freeway to the south are very limiting. In the last couple years two different development concepts have failed. This proposal may have a better chance to succeed than the previous proposals. Primarily because the offering price will be lower, acknowledging the sites limitations. We believe the proposal has merit and should receive preliminary approval subject to the following conditions. 1. Final Rezoning 2. Final Plat 3. Subdivision Dedication 4. Engineering Specifications for Retaining Wall SHADOW HILL PRELIMINARY PLAT rnit •e t .,e t . I1. of s ,..,,. .�f `r M1•t w M1I`n•.w:.a . .. w... 1f •fl�e �•.f l.r^tan. lo; �f r.0 . `u`e: u I�f•�t: • tmn•t l� w ref . i «wow e.I n. `oe .•ia s•eltneN . on.w na.� +nwrn lu.�•noron•.•wrlr t en. « a .• `l Eow. roe fln ny l.M e f C y -------- T _ _ f. I.J I l '�E Wf3ri 1E N 3 D •VENUE PHONE 15131 3519.H �r.y�ll.uo.ra u..n tnrd. �..w IlJ I I I I �'J l) I _ I '�E Wf3ri 1E N 3 D •VENUE PHONE 15131 3519.H �r.y�ll.uo.ra u..n tnrd. �..w SHADOW HILL PRELIMINARY PLAT .f t r of t t I/t of [ Tomul0 tollw.rtn. Npt�u lnp �•ll.lof r ertin. at . •IOO.It! r l.u•t Mlcn l aMtb`en 'r 011 l..tob cef t at u of r l /.� t rlY a ,i�•O.tl.ettu .epl.et Mpl.tslot 11 Gpru r.0 s •et i i�l lnti t rw.lop bss0 Mr.11.l ... at t t l/i et tM b[tEM.t l/i . i1.�9 ttut•• [ .... nc• n llM et u 'N.c. .. .lenp ..10 Nrt0 0 0! ill.i [ lu. t Nptwlep, Mten Ilu , rtM.u.r1Y of tN brtM[lY 111 n.00t tM CwvtY T---------- Ii I �) ', Yr/ flJ I (n I!� I I �J 9 .laepe ddOC117�tr 16 N 23RU.VENUE VIIONE 16121 Z Kft -ti... .00.O.l0 te.TOV. IINI II IO0t IFII[utl : �'a 1�0a ..........u0� .0 µµl w r[FY :Z7 RE7AINNG WALL CF VAP\PbLE I-EIGHf 3 CCL SPRUCE O ROCK GARDEN / WITH VARY lLS Z' RED MAPLE Z- CALLCN PLANTS L' PRIVACY FENCE PATO r �• im /a' PRIVACY FENCE v O .0 LIVING MN DcG w0m O OKITCHEN i ON. DEW VEST. i DINING 12 6 O LD. R° } ' ENI�' PRIVET'S I -12 GALL.CW PRCPEKTY LINE • Z" CRAb4PPEL GARAGE OLDEN R3iFNf1L SET SACK LINE -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- ------------------------ Z -12 GAL. SPREADING DRIVEN ✓AY YEWS PKCPERIY LINE 4' CREFa FE LWDEN Z CCLCRAIDD SPRUCE 8' TALL FIRST FLOOR PLAN va• • -0• PKCPERTY LINE . 90DrEEW019V HULLS CTEBU MHOURCO O'chaefer VELOPNENT AND CONSTRUCTION, LTD. 2581 Co. Rd. 74 (Old Hwy. 15) St. Cloud, Minnesota 56301 (612) 252 -7345 March 16, 1990 Edina Planning Commission Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Ridgeview Hills Detached Townhomes Dear Commissioners: Schaefer Development is proposing to develop twelve detached townhomes on the property located north of Vernon. court and East of Vernon Avenue. The homes will be thirty two feet wide containing approximately 1600 square feet on lots typically having 54 feet of roadway frontage. The design of the home will be one story, offering a living room, dining room, kitchen, informal dining area, master bedroom suite, master bath, bedroom /den, guest bathroom and laundry room on one level. The interior will feature ten foot walls, vaulted /volume ceilings, skylights and fireplace. The exterior will be built with a combination of brick and cedar siding. The streetscape will vary through the use of both hip and gable end roof types, detail.changes in the elevations and garage doors Paee 2 able to be placed on either the front or side of the home. The base price of the home will be approximately $175,000.00. The property has had two other proposals previously approved by the City. The first one consisted of 15 townhomes in four buildings. Each two story townhome was 32 feet wide with 20 feet between buildings. The second proposal was designed for 5 two storv-twin homes with 20 feet between each of these buildings. Schaefer Development's proposal improves upon the previously approved plans by reducing the mass o.f the buildings through the use of one story buildings instead of two story units. Also, by separating each unit, there becomes a landscaped greenspace between each unit, providing for a larger number and more frequent visual breaks through the development. I look forward to discussing the proposal with you and receipt of your favorable consideration. Sincerely, Steve Wilson Real Estate Development Officer SW:smr VERNON WOODS HOMEOWNERS ASSN. March 28, 1990 TO: EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION In regard to the proposed development of Schaefer Development and Construction, LTD. We, the owners, are adjacent to the Northwest of the proposed site. We are not objectionable to development of this property, but have great reservations as to the present proposal. DENSITY: A person must use great imagination to not regard these as single - family homes built under the disguise of town homes so regard for set backs and lot size can be ignored. WOODS: It is of great concern that, as planned, the wooded buffer we now enjoy between our property and Crosstown Highway will be destroyed forever. We suggest that two (2) homes on the West /Southwest be eliminated. SOUND BARRIER: Considering the proximity of this property to Crosstown and Highway 169, a sound barrier should be erected at the builders' expense and with the cooperation of the City /County /State. The noise from these highways is unbearable in the summer. It is impossible to sleep with windows open. We are behind the woods to the Northwest. What it will be like with this development concerns us. LIGHTING: The Highway Department maintains a light standard of approximately 100 feet high just to the Southwest of this proposed site. Complaints from the future owners of this property will be justified, and will end up in some sort of legal action. RETAINING WALL: It is our understanding that the builder intends to erect retaining walls that vary from 4 to 16 feet high. They should be engineered for safety and duration without destroying the woods and causing future mudslides. This wall backs up to city property. TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS: It is our understanding the taxes and special assessments are in arrears to a great amount of money. It is our recommendation that before this property is plotted that all arrears be brought up to date and the entire project be bonded until all homes are built and sold. As this project is planned, the builder could conceivably build one model and, if these homes didn't sell, abandon the project. If this should happen, the City of Edina would have an awful mess. The neighbors would live with a partially completed project for many years, and all future options for this property destroyed. FUTURE: As we stated in the beginning, we are not opposed to the development of this property if done in a high quality manner as most projects in Edina are. It would put this property on the tax rolls, provide homes for future Edina citizens, and be an asset to the community. Edina Planning Commission Page 2 March 28, 1990 Enclosed is an aerial view of this property. The dash line area in red is the portion of the property we feel should be kept wooded. Thank you for your consideration. VERNON WOODS HOMEOWNERS ASSN. 6705 - 6711 Vernone Avenue Edina, Minnesota •-r'•' ~ v •►. cr ej tt Az � •yam` .jn Fy;.- , J �'.- `` Sri..►'.: as' M`.P rt:r..'y.t• -.:•.: .; `- .:r�=�.. ^1c� .i 'j 'rvti2' "r.J.�`� L'sr.r'_ r.• �.,Y= jut • � �T VERNON WOODS HOMEOWNERS ASSN. April 16, 1990 TO: EDINA CITY COUNCIL RE: CASE FILE Z90 -4 In regard to the proposed development of Schaefer Development and Construction LTD. We, the owners, are adjacent to the Northwest of this proposed site. We are not objectionable to development of this property, but have great reservations as to the present proposal. DENSITY: A person must use great imagination to not regard these as single - family homes built under the disguise of town homes so regard for- set =backs —and lot size can be ignored. WOODS: It is of great concern that, as planned, the wooded buffer we now enjoy between our property and Crosstown Highway will be destroyed forever. We suggest that two (2) homes on the West /Southwest be eliminated. SOUND BARRIER: Considering the proximity of this property to Crosstown and Highway 169, a sound barrier should be erected at the builders' expense and with the cooperation of the City /County /State. The noise from these. highways is unbearable in the summer. It is impossible to sleep with windows open. We are behind the woods to the Northwest. What it will be like for this development concerns us. LIGHTING: The Highway Department maintains a light standard of approximately 100 feet high just to the Southwest of this proposed site. Complaints from the future owners of this property will be justified, and will end up in some sort of legal action. RETAINING WALL: It is our understanding that the builder intends to erect retaining walls that vary from 4 tol6 feet high. They should be engineered for safety and duration without destroying the woods and causing future mudslides. It is questionable if this can be done as each home is built. We suggest the entire wall be done before any homes are built. TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS: We understand the taxes and special assessments are in arrears to a great amount of money. It is our recommendation that before this property is plotted that all arrears be brought up -to -date and the entire project be bonded until all homes are built and sold. As this project is planned, the builder could conceivably build one model and, if these homes didn't sell, abandon the project. If this should happen, the City of Edina would have an awful mess. The neighbors would live with a partially completed project for many years, and all future options for this property destroyed. FUTURE: As we stated in the beginning, we are not opposed to the development of this property if done in a high quality manner as most projects in Edina are. It would put this property on the tax rolls and provide homes for future Edina citizens; although we question if this project can be sold due to its' proximity to 169 & 62 Crosstown, the light overflow, and the intense noise. Edina City Council Page 2 April 16, 1990 Enclosed is an aerial view of this property. The yellow area is the portion of the property we feel should be kept wooded. Thank you for your consideration. VERNON MOODS HOMEOWNERS ASSN. 6705 - 6711 Vernon Avenue Edina, Minnesota `� -. \�. \ ��� - '�,: - •.'., �.` Sri �`�� f ✓J� ; -: � _ . ,1 _ � ,.�, '� N ''Y 1 y - 11 5`�. -y �...'�_ ' � r -,yri I u Y;r. • - � � af,,,. •-`�5y!r� � 1 5 . Iwo tw. ,� � ��1j.�." "-+���.•�= �nw��K�`� �.i A.f �:). ��. -`... ' -�� t -- xi..�..j�i�`,�r • � , � _. �.r �.� � -._- � � = _ �.t..�. _.A � - �.. ^? STMT -y��: '�`�..��Y� .R�R1�' �!-_ �r y - w� � ta.•.-- ...,.ir„ } �` �=- ..�F '�" a =fir '. •.r � ''- ,� jw lN At 4 A. o e `'> ty 0 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland Agenda Item # III' H. From: Craig Larsen Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: April 16, 1990 Mgr. - .Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: P -90 -2, Final Develop- 0 To Council ment Plan, Opus Corporation Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Approval of Final Development Plan with Conditions. 1. Additional landscape upgrading along Edina Industrial Boulevard; 2. Alignment of the northerly curb cut with Bush Lake Road; 3. NSP approval of easement reconfiguration; 4. Landscape plan approval and bonding. Info /Background: See attached staff report and Planning Commission Minutes. DRAFT OF MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 28, 1990 P -90 -2 Opus Corporation - Western National Mutual Insurance 5350 West 78th Street 5309 Edina Industrial Boulevard East and South of Edina Industrial Boulevard and North of West 78th Street Request: Building Expansion Refer to: Attached Plans Mr. Larsen informed the Commission Western National Mutual Insurance currently occupies the 32,400 square foot office building at 5350 West 78th Street. East of Western National at 5309 Edina Industrial Boulevard is a 25,725 square foot multi- tenant office /warehouse building. Both parcels are zoned Planned Industrial District, PID. Together the parcels measure 4.069 acres in area. Mr. Larsen added the proponents are requesting approval of a plan to remove the multi- tenant building and add approximately 38000 square feet of office to the existing Western National building. The addition is two stories with some parking under a portion of the second floor on the north side similar to the existing building. Mr. Larsen explained that currently at the Western National building the parking situation is approximately 20 stalls below the ordinance requirement. Often employees park along the drive aisle adjacent to Edina Industrial Boulevard.. Mr. Larsen pointed out recently Edina Industrial was widened and approximately a quarter of an acre measuring 21 feet at the widest point was taken by the County for expansion. The taking reduced the parking setback and eliminated area for parking expansion. Mr. Larsen asked the Commission to note that other non - conforming features include: 1. Curb cut at south west corner of property onto West 78th and Edina Industrial Boulevard is too close to intersection. 2. Vehicles loading and unloading supplies park in drive aisles on the south side of the building. 3. Landscaping is deficient. 4. Parking and building setbacks at 5309 Edina Industrial Boulevard are substandard. Mr. Larsen noted that the proposed plan provides the following elements at the site: 1. Reconfiguration of the parking lot stalls. As proposed the number of with the ordinance requirements; 2. Provision of a loading area which from right -of -way lines; 3. Upgrading of landscaping; to add 172 parking parking stalls complies is out of drive aisles and screened 4. Relocation of the southwest curb cut east to an appropriate distance from the intersection; 5. Removal•of asphalt and building and replacement with additional greenspace and building at a conforming setback. Mr. Larsen concluded the proposed expansion meets all ordinance requirements and upgrades the site in several ways. Staff recommends approval subject to: 1. Additional landscape upgrading along Edina Industrial Boulevard; 2. Alignment of the northerly curb cut with Bush Lake Road; 3. NSP approval of easement reconfiguration. 4. Landscape plan approval and bonding. Mr. Robert Worthington and Steve Grasso of Opus Corporation were present. Mr. Klauda, President of Western Mutual Life was present. Chairman G. Johnson observed that the intersection at the site is bad, and may need a traffic light. He expressed concern that cars will exit the site and cross over the four lanes to get where they need to be, thus posing a safety concern. Chairman Johnson said there is a problem between 4:00 -4 :35 when traffic is heavy and this proposal seems to encourage them to shoot across the four lanes. Chairman Johnson said there may be a need to take a second look at reconfiguring the drive - aisle. Mr. Worthington told the Commission this proposal is unique. This building has existed on this site since 1970 and now needs expansion. Mr. Worthington said he was not part of the negotiation regarding the driveway and deferred comments on the drive aisle to Mr. Grasso. He said at this time he does not object to moving the drive aisle as recommended by Chairman Johnson. Continuing, Mr. Worthington said the proposal meets all the standards of the Zoning Ordinance. He concluded that he feels this situation is a win -win situation for both the proponent and the City. Mr. George Klauda, President of Western National said his company began in 1901 and built its first building in Richfield. Mr. Klauda said his company wants to stay in Edina which is the reason why they purchased the warehouse building. He added they employ over 200 people and enjoy their location. Chairman Johnson reiterated that he has a concern with the drive aisle and in not wanting -to encourage people who leave the site to shoot across four lanes of Bush Lake Road. Chairman Johnson said he looks at this as a safety feature. Chairman Johnson said it is possible at certain times to have cars backed up all the way to West 78th Street. Commissioner L. Johnson said the driveway by the front door may not have to be so wide. He asked if any of it,is designated parking, he said he has noticed that people park there now. He observed that it may need to be made a one way and the whole road narrowed down. He added he would prefer to see no parking allowed along that entrance road and that it would be a one way, east to west. He suggested that the point of access to West 78th Street should be an exit only. Commissioner L. Johnson said he has driven it a few times since he received the proposal, and noted these conditions. Mr. Grasso said that Opus would be willing to move the drive aisle farther to the right to avoid any problems. Mr. Grasso said the current situation is parallel parking in front of the building which is a by- product of the width of the road. Mr. Grasso said the access has been pulled back from West 78th Street and hopes it is not a hazard. He added the street works well as a two way street. Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Grasso if he sees the drop -off problem. Mr. Grasso acknowledged that could be a problem but added most people go back out onto West 78th Street after they drop off someone. Commissioner McClelland asked how may people actually visit the site. Mr. Klauda said there are few visitors. He added the width is needed there for messenger service vans, the sandwich truck, and this site seems to have an-abundance of ambulance visits. -He said he has not had a problem with the road in the past and does not feel there will be a problem in the future. Mr. Klauda said he does not want to see — -the.-road--narrowed. Mr. Klauda said there is a no- parking zone of 30 -35 feet in front of the entrance into the building. Commissioner L Johnson asked Mr Larsen if Fran Hoffman, City Engineer looked at the proposal. Mr. Larsen said Mr. Hoffman looked at it, and in practice it does work, it is an on -site operational manner and other than the suggestion of relocating the access on West 78th Street to the east, which is a good suggestion, it works. Continuing, Mr. Larsen pointed out it is a single occupant use. Mr. Klauda told the Commission the easterly entrance will now be used by employees. The employees who now use the front entrance will now use the easterly drive -way and that entrance.- Mr. Klauda said the front entrance should be marked for visitors: He reiterated most employees will use the easterly entrance. Commissioner L. Johnson asked if the road could be widened, if parking is going to be along the road. Mr. Larsen said that aspect could be studied and the City could hire an outside party to review it, if needed. Chairman Johnson asked if the City could enter into a type of Proof of Parking Agreement so the area could be policed. Mr. Larsen said that is possible. Commissioner Hale asked if the exit on West 78th could be closed and a cul de sac put in. Chairman Johnson said that would be a problem because of the County right -of -way. Commissioner McClelland pointed out that at the present time the site does work so maybe a Proof -of- Parking Agreement should be entered into, allowing the City some control if the proposed configurations do not work as they are anticipated to work. Commissioner McClelland noted that the site has a historic feel regarding the driveway. Mr. Worthington said the staff at Opus is flexible and the Proof -of- Parking type of agreement is agreeable with them. Commissioner Runyan moved to recommend Final Development Plan approval subject to the staff conditions and recommending a type of Proof -of- Parking arrangement between the proponent and City allowing the City the flexibility to intervene if there is a problem in circulation in the future. Commissioner Palmer seconded the motion. Ayes; Hale, L. Johnson, McClelland, Palmer, Runyan, Shaw, Workinger, G. Johnson. Motion carried. LOCATION. MAP FINAL DEVELOPMENT NUMBER P -90.= PLAN L O C A T 10 N 5350 West 78th Street REQUEST Building Expansion EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION 0KNa = 3:401;44 MARCH 28, 1990 P -90 -2 Opus Corporation - Western National Mutual Insurance - - -- 5350 West 78th Street - 5309 Edina Industrial Boulevard East and South of Edina Industrial Boulevard and North of West 78th Street Request: Building Expansion Refer to: Attached Plans Western National Mutual Insurance currently occupies the 32,400 square foot office building at 5350 West 78th Street. East of Western National at 5309 Edina Industrial Boulevard is a 25,725 square foot multi- tenant office /warehouse building. Both parcels are zoned Planned Industrial District, PID. Together the parcels measure 4.069 acres in area. The proponents are requesting approval of a plan to remove the multi- tenant building and add approximately 38000 square feet of office to the existing Western National building. The addition is two stories with some parking under a portion of the'second floor on the north side similar to the existing building. Currently at the Western National building the parking situation is approximately 20 stalls below the ordinance requirement. Often employees park along the drive aisle adjacent to Edina Industrial Boulevard. Recently Edina Industrial was widened and approximately a quarter of an acre measuring 21 feet at the widest point was taken by the County for expansion. The taking reduced the parking setback and eliminated area for parking expansion. Other non - conforming features include: 1. Curb cut at south west corner of property onto West 78th and Edina Industrial Boulevard is too close to intersection. 2. Vehicles loading and unloading supplies park in drive aisles on the south side of the building. 3. Landscaping is deficient. 4. Parking and building setbacks at 5309 Edina Industrial Boulevard are substandard. The proposed plan provides the following elements at the site: 1. Reconfiguration of the parking lot to add 172 parking stalls. As proposed the number of parking stalls complies with the ordinance requirements; 2. Provision of a loading area which is out of drive 'aisles and screened from right -of -way lines; - 3. Upgrading of landscaping; 4. Relocation of the southwest curb cut east to an appropriate distance from the intersection; 5. Removal of asphalt and building and replacement with additional greenspace and building at a conforming setback. Recommendation The proposed expansion meets all ordinance requirements and upgrades the site in several ways. Staff recommends approval subject to: 1. Additional landscape upgrading along Edina Industrial Boulevard; 2. Alignment of the northerly curb cut with Bush Lake Road; 3. NSP approval of easement reconfiguration. 4. Landscape plan approval and bonding. SURVEY FOR: OPUS CORPORATION 1. Issas . M•r . NlY I.rrotNt avrN, •� »Iw Y W e•e•eft1 '! 11.a 0-1: r-ap?. f...a1• IMM•w. / EOINA INDUSTMAL BLVD. _ •�.. w I .""e -re vlrplie n : N . Yea•• •wrWS LL•-rl• V sear wt- r» •».�r4 W r F� V. r».• wtrlt•Iw N r»•. !r wl..l• •� -_ R s--M •Irarle te•rfMrr n Y•rtr ps•w••rr wl• Y YeetM 11/.t MI M ewe•• rlrV.e r �\ w \ fii Yr�ie q ii »n LLw-1- fn w�ie � iwrta :iwar S\ _ ,,ere• I �w:l .`• , • rrW ,� Irt n r-M a »rate six. . ¢• � d ,� Mt � is .enter rirerM eanl .•. n NMr fulM ' --.�_ ` eC YYrwW � M �IMe r1 Y•IrW w.l .lN ✓� I �:i .•1 / �{ I • �!N� ett - ».II ».!Sale 1• 1rN r N4 .a wart rM 1 � 1 { r11_Iw r1 •w.arNalr. / • • f�r, 1, ` 1 _„ r •. I.1 w4 rr••r•r 1• •rw e1 •feMel W r•w •'� rr . n t 1 . l ir, rr wl m t.•• 1 r r-e uLLe Sena .tea MiM.q•. . • C t /'' t +r f1r•lertr r.nar rm 1• Lwer le n•ee tr Y 14- - . �� /f�"i ifs /. A- - - - - -�. _ �. •a•1!1.: fi -. ' . <.,P r.lr! nwl t Ir swale reel .rr nnr rN I, [[e1w - � r..l � _ _. t •�> • � tr. h 1, la�., [rr W ftllrel nee Ier..M tlM y. ' �� �� � t _ - , 1tJ r7. 'r�✓ y;� I � ' 1 ', �I.1 —1.11 ns 1•I.ers te�rarlLL YILLrILLt ��/ /ss� / \ -t 1 f•. , •4: •.)I Y.1 rW61 n-t Verwal y fMt M rn4.1 b". Itp W �\ �L_ 1'. ,\1 :� 4' 1 � ✓ . 1,1 f .r.•�! 11ft saeNal N [ra M rl »1.1 rlMa If 1aN-rr i P - __ ' 'il l eG :•: �� j'.:• ; .i . i t »MI- sift n"1 N ft, M -141.1 -lilt Ill V »rtM _ 4 j !� I r ; '1 . rr M•i1 N re M r114N rlsN 1tMW • `' I - /'. t ... h. }; ' 1`T, .t 1.f Ia•. r rely 1.•s.rafl lu.N+ M. n. M •.,11 Mra. ants. fr wrrrn / (.' / I I �' r. 1 -' •tent r•rwal II,a11 y n. •r .IM reN / /// • - - - I -. - S� :] "y ,� 1' rent .f wrrlr •-Nara-! In,14 N• n. - •.Ma MrM is / i , • zi �_w -' + r �� fr\ 1.1 TM .r a ..e .f u» epwe M ar M Ir .r rIM • �, ,• � I I � � _ ��- t•. -.tl•1 .1 -. Mtr• frr nl. rIM tlrulrl.� .1 -. FLOW �! 1 ■•1 res of t -a of fire epn- - t» M•t IM of .Y 4Y, ' ./ �.1� 1 . X1'•1 � � 1� - - .••a 1 »�iwa. _r Ntl.... ».te er »IM �.4.t.1.1 .I.a. ,pj /;..•awn .Y� Ir. �8 I� ►� � � i � e . w / 1 L ♦ - r \r +` w NrM. ruff Wt.t».l• 1• • •1r w ' � 1 •aN0 FLOOR-! _ i Jim 1 e W •awtl � I.r -s M tW I3 -11 -- of ear It Y•• �. 1 1 • `'� _.1 rll•1i.1• �If uY. nr » r MIe 1.1J. . , rte ul. at. 4. of _rw, 1aeo. �Jfij T 1 .,w t•1 [J�/ST/NG ? sr fUN DANG t t I �� m 1uY Nnntr. Is. I saw R mm rr sn►nr /� 1a • rw, ! apss, w nus 1• I I _J Isr FLOOR I 'I I at— ..1,i..»n• •, ff _t 11f VY1YYY1 pJi� w � I I I I \\ • ' ` ratV ` Q MOB r 1 ;ria• ,' ar +E * + as tr11��eYe -wYepr.�r n»w 1..1 i a- I� I I Y Ir I I� _ 1 o.. �. �..... _ I �- �-i � - - •rte w.r ( / I 1 1 I WAMMPM- SITE PLAN • �1 1 "UT�. M •1• r. IM l•.!. - �� 1n1g111 11 1 •y w..•1•�• .L ; wrong i am�Y�1 I�Y�Yr+1.11• ��.Y+141..0 4MV II I II I , ma1�r•rl•m11 11wr.r1. lu• I I mow. rrl.ar. II I ••o.Irly MM NO p1..1011.Im Jim I. t1.1. II Idla� I rL 11• I (t E �r r lo � w I I 1 7 E I I I � I � I I I I I I •' ► • � ' III 1w. E I I a I I II � I I I I �A Mp 1•�11N I NIL 'LwM�M•L 411+ w.L••r� w4.Ipry i 1 I I I ICI � I dY 3� �Ej I I I , I r- CL n O n n O M�l1eTWAL MOULLVAM - rw � III / d O • • O i %nmz I r ,.... rr 1 � n•— rr, r r r •�r� .h •ru ..Yr .. r..r .i � •. 1 `.vrwr:�wi. r•rr +� w r• I'. 14• —• .rr• _rr rr r•— r.rr.• w �r �•. r_ •r li •IW —� o.Hr � �.w.Y r I "M mw_ Op 01 ' //' %'- , /fir;{ % / / %/i �V1.rI //➢L- '.!�Id %',` MAIL- . . . . . . . . . . OUR, 7p XT eln"o twill ,a- III o -- E ! 4 � .(F-�- (M} 4 0 y i 1 I i!l 2 J z Z W O id N � 7 fN if @)-I u r E� IL I u r E� IL m 1 ii gilgiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiijimi iiiiji � .w9iN�11'Lr o e REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland Agenda Item # III • I From: Craig Larsen Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: April 16, 1990 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: P-90-4, Galleria ❑ To Council Expansion, 6969 France Avenue South. Action ❑ Motion Gabbert,& Beck ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends approval of the Final Development Plan subject to an executed Proof of Parking Agreement. Info /Background: See attached Planning Commission Minutes and Staff Report. I DRAFT MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 28, 1990 Commissioner Palmer excused himself from the meeting at 10:10 p.m. P -90 -4 Final Development Plan approval. Gabbert and Beck. 6969 France Avenue South Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the owners of the Galleria have submitted Final Development Plans for a planned expansion of the Galleria Shopping Center. The Galleria property includes the entire block between 69th and 70th Street and between France Avenue and York Avenue. Currently, the Galleria Shopping Center occupies the westerly one -half of the block. The expansion would increase the gross floor area of the shopping center from 237,000 square feet to 501,000 square feet. Mr. Larsen added the commercial buildings four screen theatre, retail building. proposed expansion would remove and replace three existing on the easterly one -half of the site. These uses are a a 32 lane bowling alley and a 36,000 square foot general Mr. Larsen explained the proposed expansion includes an addition to the existing Gabberts furniture store as well as a major addition to the shopping mall. He asked the Commission to note the additions are as follows: Gabberts Furniture Galleria Existing Square Feet 106,121 131,131 Addition 42,517 143,403 Total 148,638 274,534 Continuing Mr. Larsen said the redeveloped site would require a total of 1798 parking spaces by Zoning Code. This includes 372 spaces for the furniture store and 1426 spaces for the mall and other related uses. The proposed site plan provides 1,683 spaces. The developer has presented a proof of parking plan illustrating 1813 spaces. This is accomplished by restripping the lot with 8 1/2 foot spaces instead of the proposed 9 foot spaces. This would be similar to the proof of parking agreement now in place for the Galleria. Mr. Larsen pointed out the proposed expansion of the Galleria is subject to an Indirect Source Permit (ISP) issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. An ISP is triggered, in this case, by the addition of 500 or more parking spaces. The ISP application is based on the Proof of Parking total not actual number of parking spaces constructed. The critical element reviewed is the possibility of traffic congestion leading to reduced air quality. On February 21, 1990, the MPCA issued an Indirect Source Permit for the project. The finding was that there would not be congestion leading to reduced air quality as a result of this project. 'i Mr. Larsen said in regards to setbacks the proposed plans illustrate an addition to the furniture store which would maintain the existing 40 foot setback from West 69th Street. The PC -3 Zone requires a minimum building setback of 50 feet. Thus, a 10 foot building setback variance is requested. All other building and parking setbacks meet or exceed Ordinance requirements. Mr. Larsen reminded the Commission the owners have agreed to provide a route through their property for the planned transit way linking Edinborough with the hospital. The transit way would enter the site from our existing transit way south of 70th Street and would go under the building and proceed across 69th Street and through Southdale. Mr.. Larsen indicated the addition to the Galleria would match existing design and materials. The non - conforming wood exterior of the furniture store would be replaced with concrete panels or brick. The proposed materials comply with ordinance requirements. Mr. Larsen concluded the proposed expansion has been anticipated for some time. Staff believes it is well conceived and will be well executed. Mr. Larsen said staff recommends approval of the Final Development Plan as presented subject to an executed Proof of Parking Agreement. Mr. Warren Beck was present representing Gabbert and Beck. Commissioner L. Johnson asked Mr. Larsen to clarify how the transit vehicle would travel in and out of the site. Mr. Larsen said as the transit vehicle crosses West 70th Street it will dip down and go under the building and come back up. Commissioner L. Johnson observed that it is not a tunnel. Mr. Larsen said that is correct. It is a depression in the grade. Chairman Johnson asked how this project will tie into the renovations along West 69th Street. Mr. Larsen said it is the City's hope that it will tie in, in a very timely manner. West 69th Street will under go redevelopment beginning this summer and the developer, Warren Beck has been working with City Staff in relationship to these improvements. Chairman Johnson asked if this reconstruction would give the City an opportunity to have the transit vehicle travel under West 69th Street. Chairman Johnson pointed out how very busy those streets are and questioned if a traffic light would be installed. Mr. Warren Beck with graphics explained the proposal to the Commission, he pointed out the plan depicts that patrons can enter the Galleria at two levels, the upper level and lower level. The lower level of course will be the level that services the transit vehicle. Mr. Beck pointed out the potential areas along West 69th Street for signalization and added the feeling is that the transit vehicle will cross the street at off -peak times. Commissioner Runyan observed that the grade at the Galleria would be depressed. Mr. Beck said that is correct. Commissioner L. Johnson observed that the new construction will be brick instead of the materials proposed in the Gabbert building. Mr. Beck said Gabberts wants to maintain a separate identification and will do so visually with building materials. Commissioner Workinger moved to recommend approval of the Final Development Plan subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Hale seconded the motion. Ayes, Hale, McClelland, L. Johnson, Runyan, Palmer, Shaw, Workinger, G. Johnson. Motion carried. b x Q O sou � W SOUTHOALE ClSHOPPING CENTER _ 0 0 } o W. 69 TN. W 70 TN. IF77>971 .,-,T.- ST ST. PUbL IC LIBRARY 6� 6� i FINAL DEVELOPMENT NUMBER P -90 -4 L O C A T 10 N 6969 France Avenue REQUEST Building Expansion PLAN EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MARCH 28, 1990 P - -90 -4 Final Development Plan approval. Gabbert and Beck. 6969 France Avenue South The owners of the Galleria have submitted Final Development Plans for a planned expansion of the Galleria Shopping Center. The Galleria property includes the entire block between 69th and 70th Street and between France Avenue and York Avenue. Currently, the Galleria Shopping Center occupies the westerly one -half of the block. The expansion would increase the gross floor area of the shopping center from 237,000 square feet to 501,000 square feet. The proposed expansion would remove and replace three existing commercial buildings on the easterly one -half of the site. These uses are a four screen theatre, a 32 lane bowling alley and a 36,000 square foot general retail building. The proposed expansion includes an addition to the existing Gabberts furniture store as well as a major addition to the shopping mall. Additions are as follows: Existing Square Feet Addition Total Parking and Traffic Gabberts Furniture 106,121 42,517 148,638 Galleria 131,131 143,403 274,534 The redeveloped site would require a total of 1798 parking spaces by Zoning Code. This includes 372 spaces for the furniture store and 1426 spaces for the mall and other related uses. The proposed site plan provides 1,683 spaces. The developer has presented a proof of parking plan illustrating 1813 spaces. This is accomplished by restripping the lot with 8 1/2 foot spaces instead of the proposed 9 foot spaces. This would be similar to the proof of parking agreement now in place for the Galleria. The proposed expansion of the Galleria is subject to an Indirect Source Permit (ISP) issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. An ISP is triggered, in this case, by the addition of 500 or more parking spaces. The ISP application is based on the Proof of Parking total not actual number of parking spaces constructed. The critical element reviewed is the possibility of traffic congestion leading to reduced air quality. On February 21, 1990, the MPCA issued an Indirect Source Permit for the project. The finding was that there would not be congestion leading to reduced air quality as a result of this project. Setbacks The proposed plans illustrate an addition to the furniture store which would maintain the existing 40 foot setback from West 69th Street. The PC -3 Zone requires a minimum building setback of 50 feet. Thus, a 10 foot building setback variance is requested. All other building and parking setbacks meet or exceed Ordinance requirements. South East Edina Transit Way The owners have agreed to provide a route,through their property for the planned transit way linking Edinborough with the hospital. The transit way would enter the site from our existing transit way south of 70th Street and would go under the building and proceed across 69th Street and through Southdale. Design and Materials The addition to the Galleria would match existing design and materials. The non - conforming wood exterior of the furniture store would be replaced with concrete panels or brick. The proposed materials comply with ordinance requirements. Recommendation The proposed expansion has been anticipated for some time. Staff believes it is well conceived and will be well executed. I recommend approval of the Final Development Plan as presented subject to an executed Proof of Parking Agreement. .0 -Z cr - - ------ ow- .) I i . -I- C===g 6c�bl*., STING ONE.. ot-, f 2 WE S ell, STREET EXISTING BCWJ%Z t 0 0 II 7-1 c ; !.7 6 EB:: li _ I I Z -79.C5 70.!7 > ;-79.47 173.00 5-=-:-L;RES S-CM ON mROVIDES As---Z- -7 VA S. 'ONS ARE A-PROXIMATE -XIIIATE LOCA' R. Riv I%v. E L E V. 833.72 872.39 879.40 871.72 g7g.00 87!.;o 878.59 -78.4_1 EZ3.28 679.E 4 8;2. S.A E77,42 873.62 E76.55 573.15 875.3-, 874.24 574.. 970.07 97&.9- 1 17•.27 I I i II 972.23 869.61 .2 857.!2 865-46 860.96 868.79 -•\ 'ARC- -' 864.94 v,4J.._ �• +.._ INV. ._ ri. -V 66.50 p 2 07;.4- 2. 79 71 12.47 861.87 862.96 :13.65 5 W 42 865.02 ; !.7 6 EB:: li _ I I Z -79.C5 70.!7 > ;-79.47 173.00 5-=-:-L;RES S-CM ON mROVIDES As---Z- -7 VA S. 'ONS ARE A-PROXIMATE -XIIIATE LOCA' R. Riv I%v. E L E V. 833.72 872.39 879.40 871.72 g7g.00 87!.;o 878.59 -78.4_1 EZ3.28 679.E 4 8;2. S.A E77,42 873.62 E76.55 573.15 875.3-, 874.24 574.. 970.07 97&.9- 1 17•.27 I I i II 972.23 869.61 .2 857.!2 865-46 860.96 .. -.. �) - 2-1 ! i? . - 2 IL 25 2- 2; 22 -- NOTE: THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND ELECTR•C, GAS, A-43 Cov.vUNICATIC% - %ES SHow.N FRry RECORDS OF APPROPR,ATE OPERATInG �TILM AND HAVE NOT BEEN - ---:) VERIFIED. 3* CALL 454-0002 FOR LOCATION OF U%,---RGRO=' L %--S PRIOR 70 A.%" :EXCAVATION. CB /M- 868.79 864.94 C3 973.40 359-65 970.09 66.50 p 2. CB 864.57 866. ED 866.71 867.89 861.87 862.96 .. -.. �) - 2-1 ! i? . - 2 IL 25 2- 2; 22 -- NOTE: THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND ELECTR•C, GAS, A-43 Cov.vUNICATIC% - %ES SHow.N FRry RECORDS OF APPROPR,ATE OPERATInG �TILM AND HAVE NOT BEEN - ---:) VERIFIED. 3* CALL 454-0002 FOR LOCATION OF U%,---RGRO=' L %--S PRIOR 70 A.%" :EXCAVATION. CB /M- 868.79 864.94 C3 973.40 869.08 Cm 873.39 1966.94 CB 870.30 866.38 CB 873.78 868-26 ce 874.87 859.37 C3/vH 872.58 868.43 Cg/w. 871.58 867.28 1-3 .30 868.90 Eq . DE PTH TH 3.13 Cq/mH 877.91 874.39 CBIMH 877.52 873.42 CB1mH 877.89 874.07 C9/MH 878.22 874.82 CB/MH 879.92 875.12 q E, 1 5 1 0 IN 5 ff S uj poll 'A ; all Z 0 P 7039 0 EPP WE-ET W NO. 1 E. m Z) 0 V) 0 z Z LLI Li L) Z RE v 1 5 1 0 IN 3 ---------- A LS 21 1 TA LLS I 9 STALLS AM: I NC 3 STALLS AND INC "C c 9 STALLS 3 AND IMC 3 STALLS AND I MC 21 STALLS TRUCK I STALLS 17 STALLS' 20 STALLS + TRUCK STALL. P I I-n ILP u 1-7 ----- 4 -1 — 5 STALLS 11 STALLS A Illi 1. STALL. III I �! II 1111111 111 If EXISTING GALLERIA A A A a 9 fill gin 9, ENTRY -0 CONCRETE VALK L! L 7 -------- l TER. 6 STALLS AND 3 HC 19 STALLS I WW BITUMMOM FRMIMG LOT STALLS 1 uxrcmvaxmo 24'. WEST 70th- --STREET SHEET ......... --------------------- TIT -7 140' Sil TO Ill. Error IS. 416 24, 26 STALLS 23 STALLS 24 STALLS 24 STALLS 4 Ei 24 STALLS 26 STALLS EIUFrMr NEW BITUMINOUS PARICING LOT T I sm 26 STALLS I GABBEll ADDITION — ! J STALLS -SE -Sl E 24 STALLS 21 STALLS ,,,r lfi STALLS AM 3 HC I CIN:F—F� I I I I 2 STALLS 3 CR —CONETE SIDEWALK LS 21 1 TA LLS I 9 STALLS AM: I NC 3 STALLS AND INC "C c 9 STALLS 3 AND IMC 3 STALLS AND I MC 21 STALLS TRUCK I STALLS 17 STALLS' 20 STALLS + TRUCK STALL. P I I-n ILP u 1-7 ----- 4 -1 — 5 STALLS 11 STALLS A Illi 1. STALL. III I �! II 1111111 111 If EXISTING GALLERIA A A A a 9 fill gin 9, ENTRY -0 CONCRETE VALK L! L 7 -------- l TER. 6 STALLS AND 3 HC 19 STALLS I WW BITUMMOM FRMIMG LOT STALLS 1 uxrcmvaxmo 24'. WEST 70th- --STREET SHEET 77 D 0 �pl 7 25 -2 0 z III 0 2 Hc 1-8 WEST END PARKING. 675 SPACES (15 MC) z 11 E% I s 1 0 N S REQUIRED PARKING -Ln II -iLLLL 0 0 GABBERrsiaLA) —7 WEE S T 7:-, RE E T MARCH 15. IM EXISTING: 105.121 S.F. SHEET sw EXPANSION: 4LS17 S.F. TOTAL 148.638 S.F. -372 SPACES (V400 S.F.) GALLERIA IOLA) EXISTING: 131.131 S.F. ul w EXPANSION: 143.403 S.F. TOTAL, 274,534 S.F.-%373 SPACES (V200 LFJ Lj '93 RESTAURANT SEATS - 36 SPACES (Vio SEATS) PROW AREA. 32.144 S.F. - 17 SPACES SUPPORT (112.000 S.F.) MALL AREA: 46.0153 S.F. - 0 SPACES TOTAL, 501.369 S.F.- 1,798 SPACES 136 MCI PROOF -OF- PARKING TOTAL 1,813 SPACES 437 HC) 7 FA cc I FT 2' Loomm om L) z :22. < al RAM SE l 14, 2 ni.i ii i i i; 19 mc mc. mc II I III -Ln II -iLLLL 0 0 0 0 15176 'F WEE S T 7:-, RE E T MARCH 15. IM SHEET sw DEVELOPS@1RSUMMARY / GAINERTS EXISTING EJmTNG AREA: -4ES1 SF. �1 EXPANSION N AREA : sF. TOTAL GLA :4&638 S.F. J ,! I R"Llii EX ✓✓ �— EASING AREA: q:lY sF. EXPANSION AREA: »5403 SF. 4l'. 09:' S -� =� Tara GU: :-4.534 SF. - -- ww"YES: 3LI44 S.F. / COMMON DIALLI AREA: 46.053 S.F. -� GROSS FLOOR AREA: WAS SF. / PARKINS PROVIDED: LASS SPACES IX -C - SEE PROOF OF PARIONG FOR REOYRED PYSM1r ONE WAY / R[YISIONS Tpxu To fr�� 4LTi16Y AN" ACRaIS w GA VM WrrM DIM WEST 70th STRcET— — — — r II ' I I ii II � cl W Z M! i i a Y N I Q M! i nSTALLS 1 I II $ rr sTau I I7 -1-011 7111111 In i � I Ill'i IliffTFU 17 STALLS 4i! W. ��.�• EO �7Ye• �I I 1lINI IIARd +!. 1leO I� �i N i-eou SMEET NO. E / � ------_ -- . ---_-- - _---_--_ -- _---�-_- / / il l|; . |i| | " : / .0 \ |.| | |||| =^DW.D= r\ O| Ln-11 M Ill It', !011 Ill i'l � � ~ -- ----r--' / �----__ \ _ \ - `--_---� - - __---_- L----7; 7,,TFi 77 � � GL.� EAST END PARKING: 1,138 SPACES (22 HO LOAOMG ' / /- ' 7 !!� | � �| |/ � | Hillill. . � o w\ « \ !� � | / ! | U / '/ | i �� | | � . . / \ � i 3e ' � ' | .3 || LE-9 y) | | | i| | | | | | | : | | | | | | ',-� H| � | | / / - 0 WEST 70tx S-RHET -- i y Ic IL VE-ET No. 5E so BION ; I I rr. T � ✓: ^ z I ,• aoD 0 7114 tc —'pr, W Q 0 z 7 U I � i Z 1 < 1 i w U Z j I ii NON I I � i NOTE• ALL BOULEVARD ARW TO BE $00010 BI VISION$ I LEGEND GROUND DECIDUOUS SHRUB CONIFEROUS SHRUB OORNAMENTAL TREE -11 13• CAL MIN. OORNAMENTAL TREE- 14 2.3• CAL MIN. SHADE TREE- 17 2.5• CAL MIN. CONIFER- 10 9 -10 FT. HEIGHT MIN. OOR 10 ORNAMENTAL TREE EXISTING SHADE 02 - TREE -9' CAL MIN. EXISTING CONFER- 24 12 FT. HEIGHT MIN. TOTAL WEST END: 149 TOTAL TREES REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT: 120-44800 FT. SITE PERIMETER/1 TREE PER 40 FT.I no SHEET $E i i I _Q J J Q L SID WE S T 7: STREET ow W_ LEGEND GROUNDCOVER DECIDUOUS SHRUB CONIFEROUS SHRUB O 0 ORNAMENTAL TREE- 40 L5' CAL MIN. 0 ORNAMENTAL TREE- 21 2.S' CAL MIN. . 0 SHADE TREE- 49 2.5' CAI. MIN. CONIFER- TO 8-10 FT. HEIGHT MIN. EXISTRIG a ORNAMENTAL TREE OEXISTING SHADE • 29 TREE -6' CAL MIN. EXISTING CONIFER- 26 SOD SOD 12 FT. HEIGHT NON. TOTAL EAST END: 245 D TOTAL TREES REQUIRED FOR TO PERIMETER11 TREE PER 40 FTJ THE PROJECT! 120 4800 FT. SITE` ®r -7 WEST 70th STREET Lol m 1I ALL 00182VARD AII To U 800020 / I w I S 1 0 N S . 7Z) 5 U) Z uj > < ui If 11 l !if I Z Ali SHEETS NO. SE Sol, Ali li z Z 3-9018 _ SHEETS NO. SE • Heise Reinen 2m j L1 K 1.9 1 10 (G 11 .3 MacRae & Assodatm 7TIIIIECT TITLE 4LJL- 5 ELII�TIOVSELMON AT BRIDGE E It AIRIERT, -D NECK .73 C-1 31 C- 0-1 0- R! 103 2i V ELI il 'i-A-1--stj I., 0 NORTH ELEVATION AT GABBERTS \t_Y KAU: AW. 1-.r OB (D F G H I 105 0 Md .Ch. WEST ELEVATION AT GABBERTS VALE: Y3 . r. 1•4r DRAWING TITLE EXTUNIX I.E.A71ONY BULDI%G= no 0' COMMISSION No DATE OF ISSUE -at-, th-IIJ i-4 I I I! I x o, --N,. A oo"'ffm Zllm W.E.,ELEVATION/SECTION AT BRIDGE DRAWING No k DD5.2 jiF I. O 1�41' —_r- C- MU I.VATION �32 ,LH- 43 12- II H ELEVATION -4 I. O 1�41' —_r- C- MU I.VATION �32 ,LH- 43 12- II -4 7711 liritr �iNORTH ELEVATION T NORTH O a 37 4 ji 34 �32 -4 liritr O RI C Heise Reinen MacRae & AssodaWs PROJECT TITLE 0 - % E R ABBERI —D BKR :AWING TITLE rERIOR FLEVATkONY UO.G SECTIONS IMMISSION No .534W" TE OF ISSUE .14.1, , PRINTED INIA 1, Igo AWING NO f'l r I I I Y. 177 38 39 B D C c T- -T- I- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - Ell IMP 01� M.2 LL� N.1 0 - --------- 21 -1sq 111W wr L6) 1,17 1 f�l 19 if is s.9 CJ V. V 7.�� e.B 9.! 1.t s1. .J ar j `) d'„* (391 QLQVvL• %L FLOOR PLAN ZOr4 2 H RMA H E I S E R E I N E A N MACRE & ASSOCIATES CIRRI a ma I low U* DD 3.2 3B 59 q "a2 i as a 45 145.2 �a6 a7 -� - 1 9 I , \cam I ''' -_JI~� —/f L � �• a I I � •V•1 1 ! �._i. 0 �� I t \VI rs.m.�/• \ - -� -- � © ! � - - 11.9 V \ r � � r \ r I n 1 __ _ _ __ ___ _______ _ ____� __ {.ua \ r i C "\ ^ 71— ' 0.7 mt I I I 1 I I i / '• L I' b r.9' - I s•. h' � I 6 — - 71 I � r WTI I cu•.rc mr UPPER v s• • w LEVEL BOOR PLAN - ZONE 3 scue H R M A H E I S E 1 M A C A E & ASS0.I.;TES �1 (IIR bn wme. � m}(IDIa em 4 DD 3.6 f� L' o e ,, 0 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: COUNCIL From: GORDON L. HUGHES Date : -- APRIL 16, 1990 . Subject: PROPOSED GALLERIA EXPANSION - TRANSIT WAY Recommendation: Agenda Item # III .I Consent (� Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Action ❑ Motion El Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Staff recommends approval of the cost sharing proposal. Info /Background: Attached is a etter dated April 10, 1990, from Warren Beck concerning the proposed Galleria expansion. Mr. Beck raises the possibility of public financial participation in construction of the transit way-beneath the Galleria project. Mr. Beck's letter is self - explanatory as to the amount and method of this financial participation. As you know, the City established an economic development district covering Southdale and the Galleria in 1989. Transit way improvements were among the capital costs that were included in the economic development district plan. Therefore, the requested public financial participation is consistent with the economic development district plan. We have discussed on several occasions our concerns regarding the loss of state paid homestead aid in the Centennial Lakes / /Edinborough districts. One of the available means of offsetting this homestead problem would be the pooling of increments from the economic development district into the Edinborough /Centennial Lakes district. Therefore, our participation in the Galleria transit way reduces to some extent, the amount of excess increment that would be available for transfer to Centennial Lakes and Edinborough. If the City Council wishes to participate in this project, I recommend authorization of the necessary agreements to facilitate participation in an amount not to exceed $175,000.00. April 10, 1990 City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Attention:. Mr. Gordon Hughes Re:_.Proposed Galleria Expansion Gentlemen: The development plan for the proposed expansion of the Galleria shopping center has been Commission and forwarded consideration. In conju; project, I would like to improvements required as request participation on reviewed by the Edina Planning to the City Council for its . action with the Council's review of the raise two issues with respect to A part of this project on which we the part of the city. First, let me provide some background. In 1973 at the time the Galleria was originally planned, and shortly after the Yorktown development plan had been approved, city staff indicated that the city was interested in maintaining some type of access through the Galleria property on the alignment of the Yorktown linear park for future pedestrian and /or transportion use. Although nothing was formalized we agreed that we would cooperate with the city as our development of the Galleria parcel evolved over the longer term. In 1986, as we worked on the development of the Centennial Lakes development plan, the issue of access across the Galleria parcel was discussed again. In conjunction with the proposed routing of the transit way running from Edinborough to Southdale, the access across the Galleria parcel became an obvious issue. At that time, we had begun to contemplate expansion of the Galleria in an easterly direction which would cross the most logical access route for the transportation system. After discussion with city staff, we pursued a plan for expansion of the Galleria which would result in depressing a transit way under the Galleria building in order to accommodate a future transit system. Staff indicated that the cost associated with providing access under the building could be considered an improvement which could be considered for funding under an economic development district which was then being created. As our plans evolved, the concept of developed to expand the depressed area to include Galleria parking in adition to the transitway. A second level of retail was added under a portion of the building with entrances into the building from the transitway and parking areas. The result is a plan about which we are particularly excited and which we think benefits both the city. and the Galleria in considering the future transit system. The costs, however, benefit both the building and the transitway, resulting in the need to allocate a benefit and cost- - sharing. The elements of additional development costs associated with construction of the depressed parking /transit area include additional excavation, construction of retaining walls along a --portion-of the - transitway route where it is adjacent to the - -- -- existing building, a structural floor over the parking /transitway area, and a concrete drive area under to building area. In addition, the depressed area requires a new storm sewer line to service the depressed area, since none of the existing storm sewer system in the area is at a sufficiently low elevation to do so. Discussions between city staff and the watershed district resulted in the conclusion that the best solution would be the construction of a new storm water facility running from the Galleria property on the north to the Centennial Lakes on.the south. Such a system would not only provide drainage to the depressed parking area, but also would serve the proposed transitway which is not otherwise served by storm sewer at this time. In order to further the discussion with respect to the costs, we asked our contractor and consultants to prepare an estimate of the cost associated with the transit way. Specifically, the contractor was asked to calculate the cost of site work and construction associated with that portion of the site which would be utilized by the transit way as I have indicated on the enclosed site plan. A summary of those estimates of costs are as follows: Earth Work $ 50,000 Concrete Work (Retaining Walls & Driveways) 69,000 Structure (Supportive Floor Structure and Associated Improvements over the Transit Way) 56,862 Subtotal $175,862 Our consultants have calculated the cost of a storm sewer system which would be required to, service the depressed area. The estimated cost of this 33" sewer line is $183,700. While total capacity of this pipe would not be required for the transit way itself, the fact that the elevation required for f the transit way is below the existing storm sewer system results in the need to create a storm sewer connection in any event. Once constructed, however, this storm sewer provides the potential to drain the entire length of the transitway as well as handle additional drainage from other properties which may be developed or redeveloped along the route through the linear parkway system to Centennial Lakes. in view of these issues we propose that costs associated with construction of a transitway through the Galleria site and the storm sewer be shared between the city and the developer on the following basis. As a part of the Galleria construction and its related development costs, we would pay all of the transitway construction costs. In return, the city would construct the storm sewer as proposed from the property line of the_ Galleria - site to an _outlet into the Centennial - Lakes water - - - - - - retention facility on a non - assessed basis to the Galleria parcel. Our proposal represents a cost sharing approach to the development of an amenity (the transit system) which will serve the south east Edina commercial area, including the Galleria, and the community as a whole. We hope that you will give our proposal your serious consideration. Sincerely, Marren Beck WB /dg e >1� = l .�° REPORT /RECOMMENDATION CfjRpnM S ixae To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Date. APRIL 13, 1990 Subject: ORDINANCE NO. 902 -A2 Recommendation: Agenda Item # IV.A Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr-: Recommends ❑ To HRA [x-1 To Council Action ❑ Motion Resolution X Ordinance L_ Discussion Second Reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 902 -A2 To Delete Automatic Termination Provision for wine licenses. Info /Background: On April 2, 1990 the City Council gave First Reading to an amendment to the wine licensing ordinance which would delete the automatic termination provision (July 1, 1990) when no licenses could be issued and previously issued licenses would termiate. This ordinance has been placed on the Council Agenda for Second Reading and adoption if the Council wishes to continue wine licenses in the City. Ordinance No. 902 -A2 is attached together with a copy of the Wine Licensing Ordinance No. 902 -A1 for reference. 11 k. ORDINANCE NO. 902 -A2 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 902 -Al TO DELETE AUTOMATIC TERMINATION PROVISION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Sec. 43 of Ordinance No. 9.02 -A1 is hereby repealed in its entirety. Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: ATTEST: City Clerk 186 -1A -2 Mayor 0 ORDINANCE N0. 902 —AL AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 902 TO ALLOW SALES OF WINE ONLY IN QUALIFYING RESTAURANTS ._THE_CITY COUNCIL OF'THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: _Section 1. Definitions. To Section 1 the following definitions are added and amended as follows: "Bar" means a counter or similar kind of place or structure at which wine is served but not in conjunction with regular full menu service. "City" means the City of Edina. "Commissioner" means the State Commissioner of Public Safety. "Council" means the Council of the City of Edina. "Licensed Premises" means the area shown in the application as the place where wine will be served and consumed. "Meal" means entrees and sandwiches offered on a restaurant menu. "Person" means and includes any individual, partnership, association, trust, institution, corporation or municipality. "Restaurant" means.an establishment, under control of a single proprietor or manager, having appropriate facilities for serving meals and where in consideration of payment therefor, meals are regularly served at tables to the general public, and which employs an adequate staff to provide the usual and suitable service to its guests. This definition amends and supersedes the definition of "Cafe" 'or "restaurant" in- Ordinance No. 902. "State" means the State of Minnesota. "Wine" means vinous beverage created by fermentation. Sec. 2. Sec. 21, No Liquor in Restaurants, is hereby amended by adding at the beginning thereof the words "Except as permitted under Part H of this Ordinance, ". Sec. 3. Part H is hereby added as follows: "PART H. ON SALE OF WINE ONLY IN RESTAURANTS." 186 -1A -1 prior to the date of 'expiration of the license. Applications for renewal of an existing manager's license shall be made at least 30 days prior to and not earlier than 150 days prior to the date of expiration of the license. The renewal application may incorporate by reference all information contained in the original application, to the extent such information is then true, current and applicable. If, in the judgment of the City Council as to on -sale wine licenses, and in the judgment of the City Manager as to manager's licenses, good and sufficient cause for the applicant.'s failure to apply for a renewal within the time provided is shown, the City Council,' or City Manager, as the case may be, may, if the other provisions of this ordinance are complied-with, grant the application notwithstanding such failure to timely apply. (d) No on -sale wine license shall be transferred to any person or premises by the person or from the premises to whom and for which the license was granted, by any means whatsoever, including, without limitation, devise, descent or involuntarily by the operation of law, without the person and premises to whom and to which the license is to be transferred having first submitted an application containing all of the information required in an original application, and complying with all requirements for an original license, and receiving the approval of the Council, and where required, the Commissioner, provided that an application for transfer may refer to, and incorporate therein by reference, the information set forth in the original application for the license to be transferred, to the extent such information is then true, current and applicable. (e) Manager's license shall be .personal to the person to whom it is issued and shall not be transferable. (f) Any change in the persons named in the original application for an on -sale wine license or any change in such original application, as required by Sec. 37 of this ordinance, including any increase in the size or seating capacity of the licensed premises, shall be deemed a transfer for purposes of this ordinance; provided, however, if the licensee is a limited partnership, a change in the limited partners of 10% or less cumulatively over the then license period shall not be deemed a transfer; and provided further, however, that if the licensee is a corporation, a change in stock ownership of 10% or less cumulatively over the then license period shall not be deemed a transfer. Sec. 38. Financial Requirements for an On -Sale Wine License. (a) Investigation Fees and Deposit - At the time of original application, the applicant shall deposit $500 with the City of Edina for the Investigation Fee. Should the investigation require an out -of -state investigation, an additional $2,000 shall be deposited prior to further processing of the application by the City. The cost of the investigation shall be based on the expense involved, but in no event shall it exceed $500 if the investigation is limited to the State of Minnesota or $10,000 -3- liquor license, including a wine -only on -sale license, revoked for any violation of any statutes, ordinances or regulations relating to the manufacture, sale, distribution or possession of intoxicating liquor or wine. 6) Have a manager, licensed under Sec. 42 of this Part H, in charge of and on the licensed premises at all times during which the licensed premises are open for business. 7) Sign a st4tement indicating that he or she has reviewed.and understands the pertinent sections of this Ordinance and of State laws and regulations. 8) Not have applied for nor hold a federal wholesale or retail liquor dealer's special stamp or a federal or state gambling or gaming stamp or license. 9) Not be an employee or elected official of the City of Edina. 10) Not have falsified any information given either in the application or in the process of investigation. 11) On renewal, not have been found in violation of any provision of this ordinance or applicable State statutes or regulations. 12) If an individual, be a U.S. citizen. 13) Not be financially indebted to a person who is disqualified under subparagraphs 5, 7 and 11 of this paragraph (a). (b) Licensed Premises - The licensed premises must meet the following requirements: 1) Be in a PC1, PC2 or PC3, or Mixed Development District or be in a restaurant permitted in the R -1 District, as established by the City Zoning Ordinance. 2) Have an exclusive entrance from or exit to the exterior of the building in which the licensed premises are located. Entrances from or exits to a public concourse or public lobby meet this requirement. 3) Be under the control of the licensee. 4) Be a restaurant having facilities for seating not fewer than 25 guests at one time. 5) Have a valid food establishment license and have a kitchen approved by the City Public Health Sanitarian. -5- (h) Licensees under this Part H may sell wine during the same hours on Sunday as holders of Sunday sale licenses may sell intoxicating liquor. (i) The City inspections authorized by Sec. 12(g) of this ordinance ate anticipated to be made at least twice during each license period. (j) All applicable provisions of State statutes and regulations shall be complied with in connection -with the on -sale of wine. Sec. 41. Suspension and Revocation— enforcement, suspension and revocation provisions of Ordinance No. 141 shall apply to all licenses issued under Part H of this ordinance, except to the extent inconsistent with applicable State statutes and regulations, and in the event of such inconsistencies, the State statutes and regulations shall apply. Sec. 42. Manager's License. (a) The manager(s) or person(s) in charge of a licensed premise shall be an individual or individuals. (b) Each individual manager shall apply for an individual manager's license on application forms provided by the City Clerk. The application shall be processed in a manner similar to that for an on -sale wine license. Each application shall describe the licensed premises to be managed by the applicant. The manager's license shall be restricted to the licensed premises described in the application. (c) No investigative fees shall be required for a manager's license application, but if investigated with an application for an on -sale wine license and if investigation of the proposed manager for the licensed premises results in additional expense, or out -of -state investigation, additional deposits may be required to be made under Sec. 38. (d) The applicant for a manager's license, in order to be granted a manager's license hereunder, shall and must comply with all requirements of this-ordinance, State statutes and regulations which are applicable to r an applicant for a manage's license under this Part H, and including, without limitation, Sec. 39(a) and Sec. 40 of this Part H. (e) The license fee is listed in Ordinance No. 171. The provisions of Sec. 38(b) apply to this Sec. 42, except that no refund of the license fee shall be made. Sec. 43. Automatic Termination. The provisions of this Part H shall terminate automatically at 12:01 A.M. on July 1, 1990. No licenses shall be issued under this Part H after said time and date. All licenses then previously issued under this Part H also shall automatically terminate at such time and date and thereafter no wine shall be sold under such licenses. -7- Agenda Item V.A M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager FROM: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Walnut Ridge Park DATE: April 13, 1990 I have reviewed the facts and circumstances surrounding complaints about Walnut Ridge Park. .The review included viewing pictures of the park Taken during March, 1990, conversations with Mrs. Barbara Arnold,' an area resident, analysis of police calls to the location, and personal inspections of the park. During 1989, 12 police calls occurred at Walnut Ridge Park. Most calls were of a disturbance nature and some alcohol use was noted. Residents complained about late -night activity at the hockey rink in December and police patrols were increased. On March 18, 1990, police patrols were summoned to the park and noted the evidence of the use of alcohol due to a large number of beer cans in the area. No one was found in the park at that time. The next day, pictures of this trash were taken by Mrs. Arnold and the Police Department. Mrs. Arnold was contacted and the problem was discussed with her on two occasions in March and in April. At this time, a three -step strategy will be put in place. 'First of all, through the summer months the Edina Police Reserve will regularly patrol the park on Friday and Saturday nights. Secondly, regular police patrols will frequent the park more often. Hopefully, these extra patrols will deter the disturbance activity. Lastly, Mrs. Arnold will inform neighbors bordering the park to call the Police. Department, using "911 ", at the first hint of an after -hours gathering at the park. Some neighbors may have had the misconception that such a.call was not important enough to notify the police. Mrs. Arnold will attempt to dispel that notion. Misuse of parks in this manner has a long history in the City. Other parks have had a similar complaint pattern from time to time. This occurrence'of such activity comes when police patrols are traditionally the busiest and have the least time to give attention to the parks. Hopefully, the use of Reserves and the cooperation of the neighborhood will curb this problem. 'F CRAIG G. WANSON CHIEF OF POLICE CGS:nah 114A. )At f ° (`i REQUEST FOR PURCHASE v TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: 11 April, 1990 AGENDA ITEM VI.A ITEM DESCRIPTION: Various Storm Sewer Improvements Company Amount of Quote or Bid See Attached Tabulation 1 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Dave Perkins Contracting, Inc. $ 273,271.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is the bid for the following stormwater projects: STS -199 - W. 76th St. & Parklawn Repair - Lake Edina Park STS -200 - Edina Manor Area - Grimes & Halifax STS -201 - Country Club Area from Sunnyside & Moorland down Browndale to Minnehaha Creek STS -202 - W. 64th St. & York Pond Area to Xerxes Ave. STS -203 - Yorktown Park Strip from Adams Hill Pond to Centennial Lakes These projects are funded from the stormwater utility fund. The Engineer's Estimate was $324,130.50 ign ature The Recommended bid is --A within budget not Public Works - Engineering Department City Wallin, finance Director a April 12, 1990 11:00 A.M. BID TABULATION CITY OF EDINA. MINNESOTA CONTRACT 90 -6 Storm Sewers Improvement Nos. STS -199 STS -200 STS -201 STS -202 & STS -203 BIDDER TOTAL BID Dave Perkins Contracting Inc $ 273,271.00 Widmer, Inc. $ 285,041.82 G.L. Contracting $ 308,116.75 Burschville Construction Inc $ 315,329.50 Austin P. Keller Construction Co $ 321,692.00 B & D Underground, Inc $ 331,593.37 Progressive Contractors Inc $ 336,716.20 Engineers Estimate $ 324,130.50 . 0 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: - Fdina City Council & Mayor FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director Park and Recreation Department VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: April 1.1, 1990 AGENDA ITEM yI . B ITEM DESCRIPTION: , Sprinkler system for Golf Dome Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Olsen Fire Protection Incorporated 2. Grinnell Fire Protection 3 Shield Fire Protection 4 `lidwest Fire Protection 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Olsen Fire Protection Inc. - $9,475.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: 1-$ 9,475.00. 2-$14,105.00 3-$13,780.00 4•$20,361.00 5. Sprinkler system for the Braemar Golf Dome. provide materials and labor to sprinkler mechanical room, lobby, offices wood mezzanine, using a.dry pipe system including all misc. fittings. i Sigf!iatur J The Recommended bid is —— within budget not Department Wallin, Finance Director Kenneth Rosland City Manager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE SE TO: Mayor and Council Members FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director Park and Recreation VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000 DATE: April 12; 1990 AGENDA ITEM VI.0 ITEM DESCRIPTION15 Golf Cars for Braemar Golf Course Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Minnesota Golf Cars, Inc. 1. $38,325.00 2. Golf Car Midwest 2. $39,195.00 3. Versatile Vehicles, Inc. 3. $40,950.00 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Reject all bids GENERAL INFORMATION: Rebid with a 10 car trade -in. Signa re The Recommended bid is ■ within budget no C Department mennem Hosiand, City Manager N` REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Fdina City Council & Major FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director—• Park and Recreation Department VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000 DATE: April 11, 1990 AGENDA ITEM VI .D ITEM DESCRIPTION: Blacktop surface around core building at VanValkenburg Park Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Plehal Blacktopping, Inc. 1. $7,970.00 2. Bury & Carlson, Inc. 2. $9,891.27 3. Richfield Blacktop, Inc. 3. $8,556.00 4. 4 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Plehal Blacktopping, Inc. $7,970.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: Asphalt 1,240 Square yards at VanValkenburg Park Softball Complex The Recommended bid is fj ?� ✓lam` � re Department within budget not within *get o ,�Nallin, FiAnce Director Kenneth Rosland, City Manager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Edina City Council & 11avor FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director - Park and Recreation Denartment VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000 DATE: April 11, , 1990 AGENDA ITEM vl.E ITEM DESCRIPTION: Retaining wall for Braemar Golf Course Lesson Area Company Amount of Quote or &d 1. Jackson Landscape $ 8,970.00 2. Palani Construction 2. $12,575.00 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Jackson Landscape - $8,970.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: A wood wall to protect golfers on outer tier of driving range. Will run the entire length of range and keep balls in range area. r Si nature- The Recommended bid is within budget not Department Kenneth Rosland City Wallin, Fiviance Director tV9l��l lr REQUEST FOR PURCHASE v � i TO: Mayor Richards and City Council FROM: Bob Kojetin VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE. April 12, 1990 AGENDA ITEM VI.F ITEM DESCRIPTION: Installation of storm sewer and electrical trenching, Company at Braemar Soccer /Football Fie mount of Quote or Bid 1. Perkins Landscape Contractors 1 $14,892.00 2. Magnuson Electric Co.: 2. $15,980.00 3. Dave Perkins Contracting 3. $17,600.00 4. 4. 5. 5. , I RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Perkins Landscape Contractors at $14,892.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: Install 140 LF of, 15" ADS storm sewer pipe with 2'ea. 27" catch basin and trench new electrical wiring as per City electrical plans and specs at Braemar soccer /football field. The Recommended bid is x Qe� ' within budget not within budget ohn Walli , Finance Director Kenneth Rolland, City 91�SA. ?r ° ' 0' REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: GORDON L. HUGHES VIA: Kenneth Rosland. City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: APRIL 16, 1990 AGENDA ITEM VI. G. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Company 1. MINNETONKA WEED EATERS 2. MIDWEST AQUA CARE 3. 4. 5. MILL POND WEED HARVESTING Amount of Quote or Bid $ 7,840.00 2. 8,768.00 3. 4. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Recommend low bid to Minnetonka Weed Eaters at $7,840.00. GENERAL INFORMATION: The proposals are for the annual aquatic weed harvesting of the Mill Pond. 4 - Signatur The Recommended bid is within budget not Kenneth Rosland in 6161 Wooddale Ave. Suite 101 P.O. Box 24030 Edina, Minnesota 55424 612 - 922 -0301 April 16, 1990 Ceil Smith City of Edina 4801 west 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Public Officials Liability Dear Ceil, Agenda Item.VI.H William P. Homeyer, CPCU John R. Harris, CPCU .."' Douglas H. Crowther '" David W. Crowther Timothy S. Gonsior National Casualty Company has offered the following renewal proposals for Public Officials Liability: Insured: City of Edina ,Limit: $1,000,000 Each Loss /Annual Aggregate Deductible: $5,000 Each Loss (including loss adjustment expense) Premium: $10,500 Insured: Edina Housing & Redevelopment Authority Limit: $1,000,000 Each Loss /Annual Aggregate Deductible: $5,000 Each Loss (including loss adjustment expense) Premium: $4,725 The market place remains limited for this coverage, Ceil. We have submitted applications to the major "competitors" in this line of insurance, but have not yet received quotations. I expect to have options by the end of this week, and if they are more attractive, would suggest we leave the "door open" to pursue. Please advise if you have any questions. Thanks, Ceil. Grds, !,1 David Crowther Agenda Item VI.I William P. Homeyer, CPCU John R. Harris, CPCU Douglas H. Crowther David W. Crowther Timothy S. Gonslor Y, 6161 Wooddaie Ave. Suite 101 P.O. Box 24030 Edina, Minnesota 55424 612 - 922 -0301 April 16, 1990 Ceil Smith City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Law Enforcement Liability Dear Ceil, National Casualty Company has offered the following renewal proposal for Law Enforcement Liability: Insured: City of Edina Police Department Additional Insured: City of Edina Limit: $500,000 Each Person $500,000 Each Occurrence $500,000 Annual Aggregate Deductible: $10,000 Per Claim (including loss adjustment expense) Premium: $24,618 As with Public Officials Liability, the marketplace for this coverage is rather limited. We have submitted an application to Home of Illinois, which is attempting to compete in this area. Their form does, however, exclude claims arising from the operation of jails, an issue we will need to clarify when we receive a quotation. I am also awaiting a quotation from Western World Insurance Company, which has proposed reasonably competitive terms each of the past two years. I will let you know as soon as these options come in, Ceil. D6vid Crowther r A. lase REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Tom KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER Agenda Item ## VI. H & J From: CEIL SMITH Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: APRIL 13, 1990 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: QUOTES FOR PUBLIC OFFICI S ❑ To Council j - LIABILITY INSURANCE AND POLICE PROFESSIONAL Action Motion x 1 LIABILITY INSURANCE Resolution Ordinance, Discussion Recommendation: Award of quote for Public Officials Liability Insurance and Police Professional Liability Insurance prior to May 1. Info /Background: We have been actively soliciting bids for Public Officials Liability and Police Professional Liability Insurance for the past two months and had been told that quotes would be available for inclusion in the Council packets. These were delayed because some of the insurers were closed for the Good Friday religious observance. Quotes should be available on Monday prior to the Council Meeting. We anticipate that quotes will remain very close to those awarded last year. For reference purposes, a copy of the 1989 bid awards for these insurance coverages is attached. l� REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CEIL SMITH VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR - PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00 DATE: MAY 1, 1989 AGENDA ITEM Iv . c ITEM DESCRIPTION: PUBLIC OFFICIALS LIABILITY INSURANCE - Companv CITY COUNCIL /HRA Amount of Quote or Bid 1. National Union (HRA, City Council combined) 1. $ 18,000.00 2. National Casualty - City Council 2. $ 10,500.00 3. National Casualty - HRA 3. $ 4,575.00 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: National Casualty - $15,075.00 for Council and HRA GENERAL INFORMATION: These quotations are for coverage of $1,000,000.00 per loss and u $1,000,000.00 annual aggregate. This is a $5,000.00 retention. National Casualty premium quotation reflects no change from last years permium paid by the City for the same level of coverage. Agent: Bill Homeyer, Harris - Homeyer Public Officials Liability Insurance is written by a limited number of companies, hence the limited number of bids (3). Signature The Recommended bid is within budget Administration Department not wit 'n b et n Wallin, F ance Director Kenneth Rosland, City Manager A. ° c 01 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE, TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CEIL SMITH VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000 DATE: MAY 1, 1989 AGENDA ITEM iv . D ITEM DESCRIPTION: POLICE PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE Company Amount of Quote or &d 1. WEST WORLD 1. $ 33,990.00 2. NATIONAL CASUALTY 2. $ 24,753.00 3. 3 4.- 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: NATIONAL CASUALTY - $24,753.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: These quotations are based on coverage in the amount of 500,000 each occurance, 500,000 annual aggregate, and a $10,000 deductible Agent: Bill Homeyer, Harris - Homeyer Police Professional Liability Insurance is written by a limited number of companies, hence the limited number of bids (2). i r Administration Signature " Department The Recommended bid is within budget not within ud a Ilin, Fina ce Director i Kenneth Rosland, City O -II REQUEST FOR PURCHASE �rJ•,� may; TO: Mayor and Council Members FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director Park and Recreation VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE. April 12, 1990 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Greens mower Company 1. MTI Distributing 2. North Star Turf 3. 4. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR END: MTI Distributing $7,545.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: Replacement Greens mower with trade -in. Signat r The Recommended bid is within budget AGENDA ITEM VI . J Amount of Quote or &d 1. $7,545.00 2. $9,725.00 3. 4. 5. mennein Hosland, City Manager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE e OX TO: Mayor and Council Members FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director Park and Recreation Department VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: April 13,. 1990 AGENDA ITEM yi . K ITEM DESCRIPTION: Removal of diseased trees, stumps and trimming of Company Boulevard trees. Amount of Quote or &d 1 Precision Landscape & Tree 1. Trimming $2.91 /DBH in.. Removal $8.96 /DBH in. Grinding $1.96 /DBI1 in. 2 Ceres Tree Company 2. Trimming $3.34 /DBH in. Removal $9.34 /DBH in. Grinding $1.79 /DBH in. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Precision Landscape & Tree GENERAL INFORMATION: Contract tree removal and stump grinding of diseased trees.on boulevard Also, trimming of boulevard trees. All work to be done within the City of Edina. Work not to exceed $14,000. The Recommended bid is -- -k— within budget not Kenneth Department City Manager 1 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Francis Hoffman :r City Engineer Date: 16 April, 1990 Subject: Feasibility Reports - Set Hearing Date 7 May, 1990 W. 69th Street W. 42nd Street Recommendation: Agenda Item # VILA. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr.- - Recommends ❑ To HRA El To Council Action 7 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Set Hearing Date - 7 May, 1990 for Street Improvement BA -291: West 69th Street from France to Xerxes and for Sidewalk Improvement 5 -47: West 42nd Street from France to West City Limits. Info/Background- The Engineering staff has investigated two projects which have been petitioned or requested by adjacent property owners. The projects are feasible and recommend hearing the projects on 7 May, 1990. Improvement Location Est. Cost Project BA -291 W. 69th Street from France to Xerxes $ 1,067,123.43 Project 5 -47 W. 42nd Street from France to West City $ 123,208.92 Limits These projects would be funded by state aid and special assessment. 0 \N�b.aaBe1..60/ REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: GORDON L. HUGHES ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER Dater APRIL 16, 1990 Subject: TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTS UPDATE Recommendation: Info /Background: Agenda Item # VII . B Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 7 To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance 0 Discussion As you know, on April 2, 1990, the City Council approved the establishment of Tax Increment Financing districts at 44th & France, Valley View & Wooddale and 70th Street and Cahill Road. Staff is currently preparing the documents necessary to request certification of these districts by Hennepin County. Based on the Council's action of April 2, 1990, we understand that projects and proposals associated with these districts should be generated by the property owners and the development community rather than the staff. Therefore, we have not initiated any discussions with property owners or developers concerning projects-in these three areas. The Council, however, may consider the continuation of dialogue between the City and property owners which we would do through Peter Meyers. Whichever direction the Council wishes, we want to make sure the staff understands Council direction. We of course will meet with and respond to any thoughts that property owners or the development communities have. A. o e o �•'NR]PPOMt1pJ see REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To. MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # VII.0 From: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER Consent ❑ Information Only Dater APRIL 13, 1990 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ,Subject. DOG LICENSING RENEWAL n To Council j PROCESS Action E:xl Motion ❑ Resolution �! Ordinance Discussion u Recommendation: Council approval of dog license mail -out renewal process. Info /Background: At previous Council meetings the subject of mailing out renewal notices for dog licenses has been discussed and as requested by the Council background information on dog licensing was provided together with estimated costs for mailing out renewal notices. (Copies attached.) I concur with Chief Swanson's recommendation that the City instigate dog license renewals through a mail -out process. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager FROM: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Dog Licensing DATE: March 26, 1990 The attached "draft" form is provided in accordance with the Council's request. The form would be sent out in November anticipating the December 31st license expiration. A letter acknowledging the,license renewal would be sent to those who choose to use the mailing format. As recommended in my memo to you on March 16, 1990, I would encourage the use of any unanticipated revenue to identify and license currently unlicensed dogs. Conservative estimates are that the number of unlicensed dogs exceeds the total that are or have been licensed. As many as 1500 unlicensed dogs may exist in Edina. To identify unlicensed dogs, the following examples might be implemented. * Authorize veterinarians to sell licenses at the time of initial rabies vaccinations. * Have veterinarians hand out the attached renewal card at the time of initial rabies vaccinations. * Set up vaccination /licensing clinics at reduced rates. * Request veterinarians to provide a list of vaccinated dogs. * Discuss a "life time" license. * Discuss "free licensing" of cats and dogs that have been vaccinated and spayed or neutered. If you have questions or comments, please contact'me. Craig Swanson Chief of Police M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth E. Rosland FROM: Craig G. Swanson SUBJECT: Do Licensing DATE: March 16, 1990 At the March 5, 1990, Council meeting, questions arose regarding notification to dog owners for license renewal. Facts about licensing include: * Rationale for licensing: - A means of identifying stray or lost dogs and establishing proof of ownership. - A mechanism for assuring that animals are vaccinated against rabies. * Total licenses issued: 1989 - 570 1988 - 585 1987 - 629 * Renewals: 558 previously licensed 348 licensed during preceding year 118 never licensed before * Estimates of the dog population: - Approximately 1,000 dogs licensed during 1984 -1989. - 608+ of dogs are never licensed. — Estimated 2,500 dog population in Edina. * Renewal mailout cost (1,000 addresses): printed mailer - $300.00 postage - 140.00 labels - 28.00 staff time (mailout only) - _60.00 $528.00 I recommend a renewal mailout. It will generate a larger percentage of renewals. Revenue from the renewals will generate $2,000 to $4,000. I further recommend that this revenue be used to attack the larger problem of unlicensed dogs. If you have questions or comments, 'CRAIG SWANSON CHIEF F POLICE please contact me. HELP US HELP YOU. ILAM OR BRNG 11i YOUR APPUC. -MON TODAY' .A11 dogs over 6 months of age must be licensed with the City, Vl lie—arises expire December 31st of the year in which they are issued. The license tae you receive must be worn by your dog at all times. Licensing provides the City with a method of irsur ^.Pg that dogs are properly vaccinated ag---%i,st rabies. Additionally, doe owners receive tremendous value from a license in r.—,r authorities mince evert e?°or to r eturn lost dogs to their homes when thev are wearing a current license. All ocher dogs are n-risported to the animal shelter in Bloomingum where impounding and boarding :`ees are charged. NSTBL'MONS J tins; .pis 3ppli on o �n !'ail —00 Mil = ".03 L'ceMV. Eden ?r:4, ?�>a Ezecz itia �r..e• Uva prairie. 4N 55344 °Ww include X00 for &= ag :a be 'Ucam; 4 Make decks p3}-mle :o: City td'c.en DOG LICEtiSE APPIRATIO` OK•nees name Address Home peune a Ew ergnncl x Bog's name (1st) Breed _ Color See: M ❑ F ❑ (. — -� Exact Rabies Tag D=e Vet Clinic N' t Duacrs Xs.:.e) Dog's name (2.m!') Dr=Cti Color Sex: M ❑ F r } : E.•c: c: Rabies Tag # Date Vet Clinic — BLIVRTANT NOTICE -- E A ;pliptiaro ail! nat be aearped without ccmpkte ribio vacc" -aiw iedwtatiom This ir- IM=i0a 3 on your t:aaUM of II =aa Pew u= ?w Est dint if neceawy. • • Is aasmo -Na xoixymoaxi f)xissaori i.wiuo&gi Grvd ar *sae 'S:1 • i 3:�•.rt^s Animal Control Laws Strictly Enforce .;1.. Ir r• m r � C \ J M19) t�cc esosaut. -�y� '�P3 iaa ;5 1;305 3saM lost I. at.- -EaaC 8DrTOd EU'rP3 6 -foot '� leash '� irequired 4 � animal � waste ��� clean -up '�� required Hula ing dog s e \�cpeQv%.Ced. No Dogs PARK RULES No Tethered or Unattended Dags o e =° Vt;l �. ch lase REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: ;IAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # VIII.A From: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER Consent ❑ j Information Only ❑ Date: - APRIL 13, 1990 Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: [—xl To Council REYES LETTER REQUESTING PUBLIC SALE OF LAND PARCEL Action r— I Motion Resolution Ordinance Discussion Recommendation: That The Reyes letter be referred to staff for study and recommendation. Info /Background: The attached letter from E. David Reyes, 701 4th Avenue South, Minneapolis, requests that a small parcel owned by the City be placed for public sale. I would recommend that this request be referred to staff for study as to the history for this parcel and recommendation. 4 �ec'j `/ -/1- 'f D 701 4th Avenue South Suite 350 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 April 10, 1990 City Clerk Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Counsel Members: I am requesting that a small portion of land be eliminated from the tax rolls and put on for public listing. The current property identification number is 0411621340061, referring to a center island and small lot located east of Danens Drive on the center line of Duggan Plaza. I am interested in purchasing the lot and building a home on it. Please provide me with'any information on how to purchase the lot from the City. My home address is: E. David Reyes 616 West 53rd Street, #506 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55419 Telephone: 612/824 -6058 Thank you very much for your cooperation. Sincerely, E. DAVID RE S Telephone: (612) 348 -5967 EDR:tk TDD: (612) 348 -5861 by�Jl. 's 34 3� 66. 11 u �. �61' � � `1 12 �• �o r��s R,7o, !0 c'7Z0�� C. {'\� t ks 7 Id 8 u ,r'l 2 r" = ,~ ^gip -S _ 8S 90 I of, � �¢9 o a or 1 � t�0 !fir A 42 -Js •r I �� GI. N •� r �� qh J eo ; o trio W c Z-6 �w , Air •�o Mai • '�� ' "��'+ 9 - ° 14, �vV'� ,'3� _/-liR s• s�' 44 •�°y� 0j •,r11 •S0 �j as F +: sY�r�J '0(� �rjf..�y''� t is Cr11 Cr15 • a �0w P�`' 2m✓ I *d 102 ' r� ) "7� 282 ,S4 to 46 r�e4- i3 wJ ,-23 kl 9° �i '�►� 23 1% ` T 36 80' it •...�' 4 h Bi��9 z tik .248 yti' )" �0h c • fro 2f� 6 so ` 2�'' 36 I s 1h� �� 'gv^ ° '._ 14o— i - -8i y o 35 I .,.9C y 10 I ^ �� c _ 140 ,o 2 19 p - -No 311Li1lj ;� Doc 10 .a 1 --------- . -- rl c3164. L, v $ X631 g iL II i 11 M GO ..io' 110•' 60 •10'►20 oa.N..syss,lod�I� M W r•IOi , Vr o•a i a DUGGA G � i' 4 T.,, — OPLAZA of 7710... W (/ ,9 * i0 :Nfp.lt p.�• `0' �� I �\. .. 125 nte• I :tir. � 0 91jy o a I 4S !3s O e `l o - - 9 �21#4 135- = I Ot T, ;f �i -ro � �' CHURCH PL- o N ,�� 80 ,3.7 ' � �2 "� �hk _ .•ti is' .'�� -• \ X06 �,o ti ,� to �: ,,41•3r. `� 111 oti'0p6 s ,�► a ' fr I X09: ,'. �Y , �i•C' 9��5 s �° o� �1 �� N C f o e `' 0 \r�•'�' .�y% REPORT /RECOMMENDATION :aB• To: Kenneth Rosland Agenda Item # IXA. From: Kenneth Rosland Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date. April 16, 1990 Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: I -494, EIS 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adopt attached resolution urging Hennepin County participation in the I -494 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) process. Info/Background- Hennepin County has withdrawn from participation in the I -494 EIS process. The County had previously committed to fund 10% of the .EIS cost. The stated reason for withdrawing their participation is the decision to not include Light Rail Transit in the EIS. Light Rail was removed as a viable option because of the low ridership projections. Our five community Joint Powers Organization (JPO) has asked the five City Councils to formally request the County to reconsider and participate in the study. The attached resolution would be sent to the County Board with copies to our State legislators. l; RESOLUTION REQUESTING HENNEPIN COUNTY PARTICIPATION IN THE I -494 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT PROCESS. Whereas, In 1986, work began on the I -494 Corridor Study in response to the need to improve the capacity and safety of I -494 and its interchanges. This study was initiated by the cooperative efforts of the Metropolitan Council, MnDOT, the Regional-Transit Board, the Metropolitan Airports Commission, Hennepin County and the cities of Richfield, Bloomington, Edina, Eden Prairie and Minnetonka. The multi- agency cooperation wa§ demonstrated by shared funding as well as representation throughout the study process. Whereas, The transit component of the I -494 Corridor Study considered Light Rail Transit as an alternative transit mode that needed analysis. However, based upon the Long Range Transit Capital Improvements Study prepared by the Metropolitan Council, the year 2000 transit ridership in the I -494 corridor was shown to be relatively low; thus Light Rail Transit was not considered to be a financially responsible option. Whereas, The I -494 Corridor Study was adopted by all agencies including Hennepin County. The primary recommendation of the study was that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) should be completed for the portion of I -494 lying between the Minnesota River and Carlson Parkway in Minnetonka. The financial and implementation portion of the study stated that Hennepin County provide partial funding for the I -494 EIS and preliminary design; participate in negotiations for cost sharing agreements for interchanges where the intersecting road is a county road; and participate on an EIS Project Management Team. Whereas, The Hennepin County Board approved the I -494 Corridor Study which included the recommendations of the paragraph above in 1987. Whereas, In 1989, work commenced on the I -494 EIS with Hennepin County staff participating on the Project Management Team. Hennepin County was a party to an interagency agreement that set forth the responsibilities for the cost of the EIS. The I -494 EIS is the first in the metropolitan area where numerous governmental agencies as well as the private sector (Improve I -494) has agreed to financially participate in the preparation of this type of study. Whereas, The I -494 EIS is a joint effort that recognizes that every political entity that contributes traffic to this section of I -494 stands to benefit from improvement of the facility. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that; The Hennepin County Board is urged participate in the I -494 EIS process for the following reasons: a. The I -494 EIS process represents a cooperative effort between state, regional, local governments and the private sector to initiate needed regional roadway improvements. b. The cost sharing agreements between the multiple agencies is unique and demonstrates intergovernmental cooperation. C. Hennepin County participation within the project is needed and valuable given the twelve of county roads that will be studied as part of the EIS process. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on this 16th day of April 1990. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution adopted by -the City Council of fhe City of Edina, Minnesota, at a duly authorized meeting held on the 16th day of April, 1990. Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk 0 e 0 \V�RPOMti1'J� 1 ISO O REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # XT -A From. KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER Consent Information Only Dater APRIL 13, 1990 Mgr'. Recommends. ❑ "To HRA Subjej ct: EMERGENCY PLAN EXERCISE ❑ To Council Action 71 Motion E] Resolution Ordinance i E] Discussion , Recommendation: Info/ Background: Attached is a report from Chief Swanson on the simulated disaster exercise conducted on April 5, 1990, together with the scenario description. I will respond to any questions you might have at the meeting Monday night. r. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager FROM: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Emergency Plan Exercise DATE: April 9, 1990 On Tornado Awareness Day, April 5, 1990, - Edina's Emergency Preparedness Plan was exercised by a simulated disaster. The purpose of this exercise was to access the readiness of the City of Edina to respond to extreme conditions encountered during large emergencies such as a tornado. The "table top" exercise was conducted on a Thursday, during the normal workday. A different scenario was presented with both a natural disaster, tornado, and a chemical spill (see * attached scenario). Results and observations are included below: • The Emegency Operations Center (EOC) was activated at 1:20 PM and nine of eleven key personnel were immediately available to respond. The absence of up to four such personnel is acceptable on a "no notice" activation. • The initial resource review revealed in excess of 110 City employees at work and 35 immediately recallable. This, in addition to mutual aid support, EMS emergency plans and hospital disaster plans provides adequate personnel resources for the scenario used. Noted during the exercise was the fact that widespread disasters .involving surrounding communities would diminish this resource. • All key personnel were familiar with their responsibilities and took immediate and correct actions during the exercise. A high level of teamwork existed and a synergy became apparent solving problems. • Telephone communication was identified as a potential problem. During emergencies, calls in to the City telephone numbers and the Police Department numbers become overloaded, thereby blocking outbound calls. An engineering study will be undertaken to determine if modifications can be made to the City system to preclude this problem. Also, the use of portable cellular telephones was discussed. • The Edina Fire Department distinguished itself during the exercise. The expertise relating to the chemical spill was apparent and confidence in the Department's ability to manage it was high. • Congregate care (caring for displaced residents) was the weakest of the functions of the plan. To adequately perform this role, various supplies and equipment would be needed. In the event of an actual disaster, I'm sure the Emergency Plan Exercise Page 2 April 9, 1990 metropolitan "community" would respond with help along with such services as the Red Cross, etc. * The public information role was discussed and clarified. In an actual situation, the media will be very active and accomodations will need to be made. - * During the course of the exercise, the need for the "key" decision makers to be together -in the EOC was emphasized. Also, it was recommended that all personnel review their operating instructions and annexes to the Emergency Plan. If you have questions or comments, please contact me. CRAIG G SWANSON CHIEF POLICE CGS:nah Attachment M 1990 Toronado Drill - Simulated Disaster SCENARIO Cn Thursday, June 5, 1990 . at i I : C I0 AM the Oiar i cnal Weather Service issued a T•crnado Watch which inClLlded all of Henneo:n County. 5 r At 1, : iv � ., ale Sli-?r'15 were SGI.:I -;dBG =i4 t "i? Weather - _i"c:CaSi: Cffir_e- and .a Trzrnadjo Warning -,,as a tnouanc C -fur Fienneoii', County. A tarnado LOL!ChdOwn :Vas r`'_-pior "ted its r'ilhrtt:t-::' ?;;3 rear Shady Gak road and _;:ceislor Saulev_ird. Beginning at 1:211 F11 the Edina i ofice L•ispatCner begins t receive a steady s_r?am of c.a:1s from citizens tailing of tornado damage, fallen 'trees, blocked rcacs, and a derailed train in the Brookview Heights area. A police officer reports by radio Zroin his location on ;iAiv o? near TraC';/ i=iverilaE l i "l at 17 -�U : :;i'iea 'Aare -Jenloi : Sl ;aG I n `_he area -From a _crrlado. A trair: has -�r"al. led 4Vi t.} niliTie rlLl C3rKZl` cars. r'Sere is sciLe "/Ce ac .'accir cio1�C escarzi nC tr"clil ,one or, } trail-! cars. Power and `t? c JIICI ?*3 ires ar° Co✓4n i rt tine area. - Tire -DC has 'eel-, act: va `ad _ =}ai r:: SL i 0� c r2 qurCi -�r�: T.vu Ccink c_;irLi ar',e S� @r•di �_. e i tas a : a p c r C: Cuo as, --ap The o�I,er _Btr►< Car has a ii::;uic ;-L;r:ino cut from a eunCtur-e in the side, Dar X1993 placard. T:ie liQUid is draining toward Nine Mile Creek. 10 houses destroyed on nidgeview, ::uggan, and Tiiton ,fir. Two houses destroyed on the south end of Limerick Dr. Minor damage to many sul ~I- OUnding houses. Numerous residents are walking and moving around. Sri -i5 people are injured and need medical care. Two are asking for help finding family members in the denioi i shed houses. Ridgeview Drive is blocked by debris at Duggan Dr. City Hail is being deluged with requests by the media for information. Calls are starting to filter in asking about survivors. THOMSEN NYBECK JOHNSON BOUQUET VAN VALKENBURG OHNSTAD & SMITH, P.A. LAW OFFICES SUITE 600, EDINBOROUGH CORPORATE CENTER EAST 3300 EDINBOROUGH WAY, MINNEAPOLIS (EDINA), MINNESOTA 55435 (612) 835 -7000 • FAX: (612) 835 -9450 GLENN G. NYBECK MARSH J. HALBERG OF COUNSEL: GORDON V. JOHNSON WILLIAM E. SJOHOLM JACK W. CARLSON JOHN K. BOUQUET THOMAS R. KELLEY _ RICHARD D. WILSON, P.A. JAMES VAN VALKENBURG DENNIS M. PATRICK HERBERT P. LEFLER, III MARK G. OHNSTAD PHILIP SIEFF HELGE THOMSEN. RETIRED DONALD D. SMITH DAVID J. MCGEE April 5, 1990 Ms. Shirley Melander 6620 Ridgeview Drive Edina, Minnesota 55435 Re: Shinders Dear Ms. Melander: I am in receipt of your letter dated March 30, 1990 regarding the complaint of the sale of pornography at Shinders in Edina. I subsequently went to Shinders to personally view the area and the items in question. It appears that Shinders has taken substantial steps to restrict the view into the area where pornographic material is stored. Coincidentally Officer Mundale also happened to come into the store while I was there. He informed me that he routinely checks the store to make sure minors are not present. He has found the store to be making a good effort to_ make sure the material is contained in the area and no problems have arisen. In regard to the prosecution of material for violation of the obscenity law, I do not anticipate issuing criminal charges where the offensive nature of the material is a debatable issue. A significant segment of society may or may not agree as to whether the items you refer to are objectionable. If the matter is debatable, I do not believe it rises to the level of being "patently offensive" beyond a reasonable doubt as required by the law. Your view and mine are not the test. As such, such items as sexual intercourse between adults, masturbation, exhibition of the genitals and oral sex are in the debatable category. In contrast, I believe most people would agree that such items as bestiality, excessive torture, child pornography and similar conduct are "patently offensive" and may be appropriate for prosecution. I will be willing to consider prosecution on such matters. In deciding whether to prosecute, I will need to weigh the resources available to us and the enforcement priorities of the city. With the limited resources available to our police department and legal staff, I do not anticipate the police department investigating obscenity allega- tions other than on a complaint basis. Once complaints are made, we will review the situation on a case by case basis to see if further action is appropriate. It may be required for the citizen complainant to swear out an affidavit stating that he /she has rented, bought or observed offensive material describing the publica- tion or item viewed and what it contains. In addition, the complainant will be required to provide the actual material viewed in order to preserve the chain of custody of the material. Because of the significant time demands on our police department, I do not anticipate the city will be using police personnel to rent and view videos. We would be relying upon the testimony of civilian witnesses as is the case in many other criminal prosecutions. . . Ni Ms. Shirley Melander Page Two April 5, 1990 In conclusion, I do not plan to issue criminal charges based upon your most recent letter to me. I hope that the above statement clarifies my position regarding the subject matter. I believe my position is consistent with many other communities in regard to this issue. Very truly yours, Marsh J. Halbe� Prosecuting Attorney City of Edina MJH:tjh bcc Ken Rosland Chief Craig Swanson 04 -16 -90 PAGE 1 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 23- 4624 - 613 -61 6665 23- 4214 - 611 -61 80347 6530 25- 4214 - 611 -61 80347 6530 25- 4214 - 611 -61 80347 6530 25- 4802 - 611 -61 80069 50- 4202 - 860 -86 50- 4202 - 860 -86 10- 4504 - 510 -51 044751.6597 10- 4202 - 640 -64 10- 4202 - 480 -48 10 -4202- 482 -48 27- 4636 - 667 -66 2691 6824 60- 1300 - 005 -20 C421 10- 4202 - 440 -44 10- 4202 - 440 -44 10- 4202 - 440 -44 10- 1145- 000 -00 35938 10- 4202 - 420 -42 10- 4296 - 560 -56 10- 4504 - 325 -30 51961 6287 10- 4504 - 325 -30 52133 6633 10- 4504 - 325 -30 52133 6633 10- 4504 - 325 -30 52133 6633 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10738 6643 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 106702 03/30/90 80.52 DANIEL SMITH COST /GOODS SOLD 80.52 106703 04/09/90 219.86 MPLS ZIP SORT CORP ADVERTISING 106703 04/09/90 219.86- MPLS ZIP SORT CORP ADVERTISING 106703 04/09/90 219.86 MPLS ZIP SORT CORP ADVERTISING 106703 03/30/90 161.51 MPLS ZIP SORT CORP CENTRAL SERVICES 381.37 106704 03/30/90 380.00 COLLEGE OF ST THOMAS SCHOOL 106704 03/30/90 380.00 COLLEGE OF ST THOMAS SCHOOL 760.00 106705 03/30/90 27.00 GOVT FINANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 27.00 106706 03/30/90 76.70 VINCE COCKRIEL SCHOOL 76.70 106707 03/30/90 100.00 IZATHY GULF SPRING CONFERENCE 106707 03/30/90 100.00 IZATHY GULF SPRING CONFERENCE 200.00 106708 03/30/90 60.00 BRAEMAR PRO SHOP RENTAL WOODS 60.00 * 106709 04/03/90 74,997.00 CSI ELECTRIC ELECTRICAL WORK 74,997.00 * 106710 04/03/90 10.00 DOUGLAS BAGLEY REFUND 10.00 * 106711 04/03/90 15.00 MN AMBULANCE DUES 15.00 * 106712 04/03/90 10.00 BRUCE GATES REFUND 10.00 * 106713 04/03/90 700.00 POUCHER PRINTING BOND PRINTING - 700.00 * 106714 04/03/90 350.00 DARE OFFICERS CONT ED 350.00 * 106715 04/03/90 326.00 EDINA POLICE CAR WASHES 326.00 * 106716 04/02/90 406.50 M R SIGN EQUIPMENT 106716 04/09/90 224.17 M R SIGN STRAPPONG 106716 04/09/90 224.17 M R SIGN STRAPPING 106716 04/09/90 224.17- M R SIGN STRAPPONG 630.67 * 106717 04/02/90 48.00 MIDLAND EQUIPMENT FILTER 48.00 * 04 -16 -90 PAGE 1 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 23- 4624 - 613 -61 6665 23- 4214 - 611 -61 80347 6530 25- 4214 - 611 -61 80347 6530 25- 4214 - 611 -61 80347 6530 25- 4802 - 611 -61 80069 50- 4202 - 860 -86 50- 4202 - 860 -86 10- 4504 - 510 -51 044751.6597 10- 4202 - 640 -64 10- 4202 - 480 -48 10 -4202- 482 -48 27- 4636 - 667 -66 2691 6824 60- 1300 - 005 -20 C421 10- 4202 - 440 -44 10- 4202 - 440 -44 10- 4202 - 440 -44 10- 1145- 000 -00 35938 10- 4202 - 420 -42 10- 4296 - 560 -56 10- 4504 - 325 -30 51961 6287 10- 4504 - 325 -30 52133 6633 10- 4504 - 325 -30 52133 6633 10- 4504 - 325 -30 52133 6633 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10738 6643 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 106718 04/02/90 248.66 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE WINGPOST 248.66 * 106719 04/02/90 232.50 BOB KLEIN & ASSO PARTS FOR BLEACHERS 232.50 * 106720 04/09/90 26.06 LAND EQUIPMENT IDLER 106720 04/09/90 3.72 LAND EQUIPMENT SEAL 106720 04/09/90 30.91 LAND EQUIPMENT SEAL /GASKETS 106720 04/02/90 5.23 LAND EQUIPMENT REPAIR.PARTS 65.92 * 106721 04/03/90 40.00 DIE BAVARIAN SERVICES 5/31/90 40.00 * 106722 04/03/90 75.00 VALERIE WEBER SERVICES 5/22/90 75.00 * 106723 04/03/90 75.00 TOM PRIN SERVICES 5%21/90 75.00 * 106724 04/03/90 50.00 KENWOOD CHAMBER SERVICES 5/13/90 50.00 * 106725. 04/03/90 75.00 ROBERT BURTIS SERVICES 5/10/90 75.00 * 106726 04/03/90 150.00 DEE TRAUDT SERVICES 5/13/90 150.00 * 106727 04/03/90 40.00 SYMPHOKNOLLS SERVICES 5/6/90 40.00 * 106728 04/03/90 18.00 PR NEWSWIRE ADVERTISING 18.00 * 106729 04/03/90 290.00 MARK PROMOTIONS ADVERTISING 290.00 * 106730 04/03/90 88.00 SAGMORE PUBLISHING FIVE BOOKS 88.00 * 106731 04/03/90 15.00 THE FITNESS STORE GENERAL SUPPLIES 15.00 * 106732 04/03/90 6,550.00 SCHARBER & SONS INC JD 915 6,550.00 * 106733 04/03/90 41.68 THE CHIEF OF POLICE ADVERTISING 106733 04/03/90 41.66 THE CHIEF OF POLICE ADVERTISING 106733 04/03/90 41.66 THE CHIEF OF POLICE ADVERTISING 125.00 * 106734 04/03/90 11.66 MN VIETNAM VETERAN ADVERTISING • 04 -16 -90 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 4310 6174 10- 4201 - 647-64 6730 10- 4540 - 560 -56 231723 6731 10- 4540 - 560 -56 231597 6581 10- 4540 - 560 -56 231651 6726 10- 4540 - 560 -56 231486 6581 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 7781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4214 - 781 -78 273995 6881 30- 4214 - 781 -78 3291 6878 30- 4204 - 781 -78 30- 4504 - 782 -78 30691 6773 10- 4901- 650 -64 8581 6500 50- 4214 - 842 -84 50- 4214 - 862 -86 50- 4214 - 862 -86 50- 4214 - 822 -82 FA a 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 04- 16 -90' PAGE 3 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO, INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 106734 04/03/90 11.66 MN VIETNAM VETERAN ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 842 -84 106734 04/03/90 11.68 MN VIETNAM VETERAN ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 862 -86 35.00 * 106735 04/03/90 52.38 PETER SAABYE MILEAGE 28- 4208 - 701 -70 52.38 * 106736 04/03/90 93.19 STATE SUPPLY COMP REPAIR PUMP 28- 4248 - 702 -70 30406 6665 93.19 * 106737 04/03/90 30.00 ELLIOTT MARSTON SEMINAR 10- 4202 - 480 -48 30.00 * 106738 04/03/90 60.00 NATL ENVIRO DUES 10- 4204 - 480 -48 60.00 * 106739 04/03/90 13,298.03 PUBLIC FINANCIAL BOND ISSUE 10- 1145 - 000 -00 13,298.03 * * * * * ** * * * -CKS 106741 04/05/90 182.55 TRI STATE VIDEO SERV VIDEO REPAIR 27- 4248 - 669 -66 1225 5337 182.55 * 106742 04/05/90 75.00 MN APA CONFERENCE 10- 4202 - 120 -12 75.00 * 106743 04/05/90 17,755.03 WH CATES CONSTR ARNESON ADD 60- 1300 - 015 -20 106743 04/05/90 7,141.52 WH CATES CONSTR ARNESON ADD 60- 1300 - 015 -20 24,896.55 * 106744 04/05/90 231.00 JOHN L THAYER SCHOOL 10- 4202 - 600 -60 231.00 * 106745 04/05/90 479.00 COLORADO MINERAL CANOPY 10- 4504- 646 -64 119853 6891 106745 04/05/90 24.66 COLORADO MINERAL CANOPY 10- 4504 - 646 -64 119859 6898 503.66 * 106746 04/05/90 78.00 LEARNING RES NETWORK DUES 30- 4204 - 781 -78 50948 6671 78.00 * 106747 04/05/90 30.00 M.P.S.A. MEETING 10- 4202 - 640 -64 30.00 * 106748 04/05/90 1,510.47 WACO INTERNATIONAL CONSTRUCTION 30- 1340 - 782 -78 525165 6619 1,510.47 * 106749 04/09/90 420.00 BERG BAG COMPANY SANDBAGS 41- 4504 - 900 -90 17924 6650 106749 04/05/90 840.00 BERG BAG COMPANY SAND BAGS 41- 4504- 900 -90 17839 6494 1,260.00 * 106750 04,/05/90 53.66 MPLS SPOKESMAN ADVERTISING 10- 4212 - 510 -51 53.66 * 106751 04/05/90 223.99 MENARDS REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 646 -64 53460 6319 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 106752 106753 106754 106755 106757 106758 106760 106760 106761 106762 106763 106764 106765 106766 106767 106768 106769 106770 I 04/05/90 04/05/90 04/05/90 04/05/90 AMOUNT 488.75 223.99 * 32.50 27- 4214 - 667 -66 32.50 * 63.00 488.75 63.00 * 1,584.97 1,584.97 * 162.05 24.00 162.05 * CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ROBERT GRUNDSTROM SHERIFFS DEPT TCS ENTERPRISES .BE MEYERS CONT ED EQUIP MAINT AMMUNITION EQUIP MAINT 04 -16 -90 PAGE 4 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4202 - 420 -42 10- 4274 - 420 -42 10- 4572 - 420 -42 2469 10- 4274 - 420 -42 11616 6773 04/06/90 488.75 WCCO TV INC ADVERTISING 27- 4214 - 667 -66 6966 488.75 * 04/06/90 24.00 SIMMONS CATERING CANDLES 27- 4504 - 662 -66 5896 24.00 * PIVAR COMPUTING SERV. 04/06/90 108.43, iNe FILE CONVERSION 10- 4504 - 510 -51 6829 04/06/90 85.50 HONEYWELL INC REPAIRS 27- 4248 - 662 -66 6041 04/06/90 2,614.89 SAHARA SPROTSWEAR UNIFORMS 27- 4504- 661 -66 149944 6228 2,614.89 04/09/90 107.43 CERAMIC ARTS /SUPP CRAFT SUPPLIES 23- 4588 - 611 -61 15331 6669 107.43 * 04/09/90 50.00 HARTLAND CLOGGERS PEROFRMANCE 5/1/90 30- 4224 - 781 -78 50.00 * 04/09/90 80.00 JAMES TOENSING PERFORMANCE 5/17/90 30- 4224 - 781 -78 80.00 * 04/09/90 50.00 PAT FUHR PERFORMANCE 6/10/90 30- 4224 - 781 -78 50.00 * 04/09/90 100.00 CAROL MCCORMICK PERFORMANCE 5/31/90 30- 4224 - 781 -78 100.00 * 04/09/90 15.00 MPSA CONFERENCE 30- 4202 - 781 -78 15.00 * 04/09/90 77.95 JACK MCCLARD /ASSO SERVICE CALL 10- 4580 - 560 -56 63083 6798 77.95 * 04/09/90 37.46 SUTPHEN CORP CABLE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 18235 6838 37.46 * 04/09/90 127.73 VINCENT METALS EXTENSIONS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 6567 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 04/09/90 04/09/90 04/09/90 04/09/90 04/09/90 04/09/90 04/09/90 04/09/90 04/09/90 04/09/90 04/09/90 04/09/90 04/09/90 04/09/90 04/09/90 04/09/90 04/09/90 04/09/90 04/09/90 04/09/90 04 -15 -90 PAGE 5 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4542 - 325 -30 6408 CHECK REGISTER 6403 10- 4620 - 560 -56 601660 AMOUNT 10- 4540 - 540 -54 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 127.73 23- 3625 - 000 -00 23- 3625 - 000 -00 61.00 SIGN -TIFIC SIGN 23- 3625 - 000 -00 10.00 23- 3625 - 000 -00 SIGN -TIFIC PREMASK 71.00 23- 3625- 000 -00 10- 4540 - 560 -56 62853 332.04 23- 3625- 000 -00 VAN 0 LITE INC PARTS 332.04 23- 3625 - 000 -00 23- 4120 - 613 -61 2,799.19 ST HILAIRE SUPPLY CO PLBG REPAIRS 2,799.19 54.52 ANN WIDERSTROM ART WORK SOLD 54.52 * 31.50 HELEN VAN WINKLE ART WORK SOLD 31.50 * 64.40 CY TURNBLADH ART WORK SOLD 64.40 * 21.00 MARGARET NORDSTOG ART WORK SOLD 21.00 * 34.13 SHARON MCKISSON ART WORK SOLD 34.13 * 38.50 BARBARA LUNDGREN ART WORK SOLD 38.50 * 35.00 OBERON LESLIE ART WORK SOLD 35.00 * 21.00 NAN GRIMSBEY ART WORK SOLD 21.00 * 45.50 ROSE EDIN ART WORK SOLD 45.50 * 327.50 BRYAN MOON ARTWORK SOLD 327.50 * TWIN CITY ENGINE REBUILDERS 79.28 PLUGS 612.50 KAY SHARKEY ART WORK SOLD 69i. ?8 186.00 MARIAN ALSTAD AC INSTRUCTOR 186.00 240.00 MONICA RUDQUIST PT MAINT AC 240.00 266.53 MOLLIE PAULSON ART WORK SOLD 209.15 MOLLIE PAULSON PERSONNEL SERVICES 475.68 04 -15 -90 PAGE 5 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4542 - 325 -30 6408 10- 4542 - 325 -30 - 6403 10- 4620 - 560 -56 601660 6657 10- 4540 - 540 -54 6026 23- 3625 - 000 -00 23- 3625 - 000 -00 23- 3625 - 000 -00 23- 3625 - 000 -00 23- 3625 - 000 -00 23- 3625 - 000 -00 23- 3625 - 000 -00 23- 3625- 000 -00 23- 3625- 000 -00 23- 3625- 000 -00 10- 4540 - 560 -56 62853 6573 23- 3625- 000 -00 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4120- 612 -61 23- 3625 - 000 -00 23- 4120 - 613 -61 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 106788 04/09/90 38.95 NAOMI JOHNSON GENERAL SUPPLIES 106788 04/09/90 17.63 NAOMI JOHNSON OFFICE SUPPLIES 106788 04/09/90 1,167.67 NAOMI JOHNSON AC CRAFT SUPPLIES 106788 04/09/90 1,167.67- NAOMI JOHNSON AC CRAFT SUPPLIES 106788 04/09/90 116.67 NAOMI JOHNSON AC CRAFT SUPPLIES 173.25 106789 04/09/90 125.62 JOAN WATERSTREET CONT ED 106789 04/09/90 26.40 JOAN WATERSTREET MEETING EXP 106789 04/09/90 67.07 JOAN WATERSTREET MILEAGE 106789 04/09/90 21.20 JOAN WATERSTREET BOOKS /PAMPHLETS 106789 04/09/90 154.29 JOAN WATERSTREET GENERAL SUPPLIES 106789 04/09/90 81.81 JOAN WATERSTREET PHOTO SUPPLIES 106789 04/09/90 28.96 JOAN WATERSTREET AMMUNITION 106789 04/09/90 4.20 JOAN WATERSTREET GENERAL SUPPLIES 509.55 106790 04/09/90 1,443.73 DURAFLEX INT CORP DIVING BOARD REF 1,443.73 * 106791 04/10/90 3,750.00 NAKED ZOO ENTERP SHOW LIGHTS 3,750.00 * 106792 04/10/90 24,586.00 ORR CONSTRUCTION PAYMENT 24,586.00 * 106793 04/10/90 96.00 ROXANNE SEIDEL PRO SERVICE /MAY 96.00 * 106794 04/10/90 19,219.42 METRO REFUSE 50TH ST GARBAGE 19,219.42 * 106795 04/10/90 4,757.96 HOISINGTON GROUP TIF DISTRICT EST 4,757.96 * 106796 04/10/90 15.00 MN GFOA DUES 15.00 * 106797 04/10/90 185.00 GFOA DUES 185.00 * 106798 04/10/90 77.00 EDINA SOCCER ASSN REGISTRATION FEE 77.00 * 106799 04/10/90 979.46 ROLL UP SHUTTER CO SHUTTERS - 979.46 * 106800 04/10/90 875.00 LINDA KOZAK PAYMENT 875.00 * 106801 04/10/90 600.00 ESPECIALLY.FOR RENTAL /OFFICE SPACE 600.00 * 1068021 04/10/90 766.48 PAT GREER PAYMENT 04 -16 -90 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 23- 4504 - 613 -61 23- 4516 - 611 -61 23- 4588 - 611 -61 23- 4588 - 611 -61 23- 4588 - 611 -61 10- 4202 - 420 -42 10- 4206 - 420 -42 10- 4208 - 420 -42 10- 4502 - 420 -42 10- 4504 - 420 -42 10- 4508 - 420 -42 10- 4572 - 420 -42 12- 4504 - 434 -43 10- 4248 - 682 -68 38454 3399 28- 4201 - 702 -70 5864 6953 60- 2040 - 000 -00 30- 4201 - 781 -78 10- 4201- 395 -30 110900 10- 4201 - 500 -50 10- 4204 - 160 -16 10- 4204 - 160 -16 282889 10- 3500- 000 -00 27- 1300 - 005 -00 6951 30- 4201 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4201 - 781 -78 6 1990 CITY OF EDINA PERFORMANCE 5/17/90 30- 4224 - 781 -78 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT PERFORMANCE 6/28/90 30- 4224 - 781 -78 766.48 30- 4224 - 781 -78 * 106803 04/10/90 30.00 BACKPLATE 10- 4540 - 330 -30 20222 5479 PAGER SERVICE 30.00 * 106804 04/10/90 75.00 12- 4248 - 434 -43 PAGER SERVICE 40- 4248 - 801 -80 75.00 BATTERY * 106805 04/10/90 60.00 11338 6854 BATTERY 40- 4548 - 802 -80 6854 60.00 40- 4548 - 802 -80 * 106806 04/10/90 100.00 SUBSCRIPTION 10- 4204 - 440 -44 REIMBURSEMENT 100.00 * 106807 04/10/90 75.00 10- 4510 - 440 -44 11112 5812 AIR BAGS /TRG 10- 4608 - 440 -44 75.00 AIR BAFS /TRG * 106808 04/10/90 126.00 47094 5813 NITRONOX 10- 1139 - 000 -00 111940 5806 126.00 * 106809 04/10/90 111.00 111.00 * 106810 04/10/90 52.00 106810 04/10/90 12.50 106810 04/10/90 6.50 106810 04/10/90 32.00 103.00 106811 04/10/90 184.60 106811 04/10/90 135.00 106811 04/10/90 135.00- 106811 04/10/90 135.00 319.60 106812 04/10/90 183.00 183.00 106813 04/10/90 31.50 31.50 106814 04/10/90 79.98 79.98 106815 04/10/90 55.00 55.00 106816 04/10/90 83.58 83.58 106817 04/10/90 50.58 106817 04/10/90 50.58 106817 04/10/90 50.58- 50.58 106818 04/10/90 1,058.78 CHECK REGISTER 04 -16 -90 PAGE 7 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE MN DEPT OF MAX KRAUSE N HENN COM CO N HENN COMM COL MAX KRAUSE INDUSTRIAL SPRINKLER TRAFFIC CONTROL CORP AIRSIGNAL AIRSIGNAL AIRSIGNAL AIRSIGNAL NATL CUSTOM ENTERP NATL CUSTOM ENTERP NATL CUSTOM ENTERP NATL CUSTOM ENTERP ALPHA VIEDO /AUDIO FIRE COMMAND THEODORE PAULFRANZ LEAANNS SEW /DECO CIVIC SUPPLY INC ARMSTRONG MED INDUS ARMSTRONG MED INDUS ARMSTRONG MED INDUS COUNTS MED EQUIP LICENSE FEE 30- 4202 - 781 -78 PERFORMANCE 5/17/90 30- 4224 - 781 -78 PERFORMANCE 7/24/90 30- 4224 - 781 -78 PERFORMANCE 6/28/90 30- 4224 - 781 -78 PERFORMANCE 4/28/90 30- 4224 - 781 -78 SPRINKLER INSPECTION 50- 4248 - 841 -84 M10176 BACKPLATE 10- 4540 - 330 -30 20222 5479 PAGER SERVICE 10- 4226 - 420 -42 PAGER SERVICE 10- 4248 - 540 -54 PAGER SERVICE 12- 4248 - 434 -43 PAGER SERVICE 40- 4248 - 801 -80 BATTERY 10- 4540 - 646 -64 11260 6782 BATTERY 40- 4540 - 802 -80 11338 6854 BATTERY 40- 4548 - 802 -80 6854 BATTERY 40- 4548 - 802 -80 6854 BRACKETS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 6707 SUBSCRIPTION 10- 4204 - 440 -44 REIMBURSEMENT 10- 4504 - 440 -44 GEAR REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 440 -44 89051 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 10- 4510 - 440 -44 11112 5812 AIR BAGS /TRG 10- 4608 - 440 -44 47094 5813 AIR BAFS /TRG 10- 4608 - 440 -44 47094 5813 AIR BAFS /TRG 10- 4608 - 440 -44 47094 5813 NITRONOX 10- 1139 - 000 -00 111940 5806 I 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 04 -16 -90 PAGE 8 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV.' # P.O. # MESSAGE 106818 04/10/90 28.81 COUNTS MED EQUIP LARYNGOSCOPE 10- 4510 - 440 -44 110332 5420 1,087.59 106819 04/10/90 3.69 DIANE SANKEY SUPPLIES /LAB 10- 4504 - 482 -48 106819 04/10/90 58.66 DIANE SANKEY BURNER-ASSY 10- 4540 - 560 -56 106819 04/10/90 19.28 DIANE SANKEY PLANTS /BULBS 10- 4560 - 644 -64 106819 04/10/90 19.28 DIANE SANKEY PLANTS /BULBS 10- 4560- 644 -64 106819 04/10/90 6.75 DIANE SANKEY ELECT CIRCUIT BOARD 40- 4504 - 803 -80 107.66 106820 04/10/90 90.37 BOB BRAMWELL MILEAGE 30- 4208 - 781 -78 90.37 106821 04/10/90 100.00 PAR GREER EXHIBIT FEE /MARCH 30- 3501 - 000 -00 100.00 106822 04/10/90 210.00 GOLF COURSE DUES 27- 4204 - 661 -66 210.00 * 106823 04/10/90 150.00 LINDENFELSERS RUBBISH /DUMP 10- 4250 - 644 -64 2880 150.00 * 106824 04/10/90 1,167.96 AEC ENGINEERS PRO ENG SERV 40- 4201 - 800 -80 1,167.96 * 106825 '04/10/90 8,302.29 LAYNE MINNESOTA CO PAYMENT 60- 2040 - 000 -00 .8,302.29 * 106826 04/10/90 2,200.00 SPANCRETE MIDWEST 8" PLANKS 25- 4900 - 005 -54 10064 6294 2,200.00 * 106A03 04/05/90 8.48 A -Z RENTAL RENTAL EQUIPMENT 27- 4540 - 667 -66 ** *-CKS 106A03 04/05/90 200.34 A -Z RENTAL RENTAL EQUIPMENT 27- 4540 - 667 -66 77395 84 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 106A06 04/03/90 58.00 A -1 ROOTMASTER REPAIR DRAIN 28- 4248 = 702 -70 75865 6884 58.00 * 106A07 04/09/90 62.06 ALL -AMER BOTTLING MIX 50- 4632 - 822 -82 106A07 04/09/90 67.40 ALL -AMER BOTTLING MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 129.46 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 106A09 04/02/90 715.12 AAA CAR EXP 10- 4310 - 560 -56 715.12 * * ** -CKS 106A11 04/10/90 16.32 ACE SUPPLY PIPE 10- 4540 - 540 -54 6797 16.32 * * * ** ** * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 04 -16 -90 PAGE 9 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 106A25 04/10/90 1,670.00 ALCO CAPITAL RES COPIER PURCHASED 28- 1300 - 000 -00 148340 6822 1,670.00 ** * * ** * ** -CKS 106A29 04/03/90 120.52 ALBINSON PAINT 10- 4504- 646 -64 630635 6489 106A29 04/06/90 50.70 ALBINSON MAP REDUCTION 10- 4570 - 260 -26 637699 5352 171.22 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 196A36 94, 95, 99 8.48 AEJT^�TIVS�- !PIS- RENTA6 EQUIPMENT 2a- 548 --66 78721 - X778 - -- � --48 -* t k * * k * ** -CKS 106A39 04/02/90 166.29 ALTERNATOR REBUILD BRUSH /HAMMER 10- 4504 - 325 -30 1759 6478 106A39 04/02/90 109.44 ALTERNATOR REBUILD BATTERY 10- 4504 - 325 -30 1763 6560 106A39 04/02/90 151.14 ALTERNATOR REBUILD BATTERY 10- 4504 - 440 -44 1762 6561 106A39 04/09/90 45.90 ALTERNATOR REBUILD CASTER 10- 4504 - 560 -56 1764 6721 106A39 04/02/90 171.87 ALTERNATOR REBUILD WHEEL 10- 4504 - 560 -56 1757 6378 106A39 04/02/90 29.95 ALTERNATOR REBUILD DRIVE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 1760 6378 106A39 04/02/90 45.00 ALTERNATOR REBUILD REBUILT 10- 4540 - 560 -56 14782 6513 106A39 04/03/90 135.00 ALTERNATOR REBUILD REBUILT 10- 4540 - 560 -56 14783 6514 106A39 04/02/90 163.66 ALTERNATOR REBUILD LADDER 10- 4580 - 440 -44 1758 6348 106A39 04/02/90 236.43 ALTERNATOR REBUILD TAPE MEASURES 10- 4580- 560 -56 1761 6503 1,254.68 * 106A40 03/30/90 176.70 ACTION MAILING SERV MAILING INSERT 40- 4201 - 800 -80 3186 176.70 * 106A41 04/06/90 210.30 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE MEAT 27- 4624 - 663 -66 210.30 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 106A49 04/02/90 203.15 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 440 -44 106A49 04/02/90 9.82 AMERICAN LINEN LAB TOWELS 10- 4262 - 482 -48 106A49 04/02/90 113.81 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 520 -52 106A49 04/06/90 9.99 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 27- 4262 - 663 -66 106A49 04/03/90 159.73 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 30- 4262- 782 -78 106A49 04/02/90 55.87 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50- 4262 - 821 -82 106A49 04/02/90 78.13 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50 =4262- 841 -84 106A49 04/02/90 65.56 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50- 4262 - 861 -86 696.06 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 106A54 04/05/90 35.00 AAGARD RECYCLING 50- 4250 - 821 -82 106A54 04/05/90 35.00 AAGARD RECYCLING 50- 4250 - 841 -84 106A54 04/05/90 35.00 AAGARD RECYCLING 50- 4250 - 861 -86 105.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 04 -16 -90 PAGE 10 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 106A80 04/02/90 144.00 ASTLEFORD INTL PUMP FOR CAB 10- 4540 - 560 -56 A62155 6648 144.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 106A96 04/02/90 33.50 AUTOMOBILE SERV CTR ALIGNMENT 10- 4248 - 560 -56 6842 6646 33.50 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 106A98 04/10/90 352.95 AVR INC REPAIRS 10- 4248 7646 -64 19524 2086 352.95 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 106B03 04/02/90 30.10 BENSON GLASSES 10- 4262 - 646 -64 288272 106B03 04/05/90 34.34 BENSON SAFETY GLASSES 10- 4262- 646 -64 291579 106803 04/02/90 64.50 BENSON GLASSES 10- 4262 - 646 -64 287616 128.94 * * * ** * ** -CKS 106B13 04/10/90 104.50 BARR ENGINEERING PRO ENG SERVICES 10- 4201 - 260 -26 106813 03/30/90 6,699.84 BARR ENGINEERING PRO SERV ENG 41- 4201 - 900 -90 106813 04/10/90 8,445.21 BARR ENGINEERING PRO ENG SERV 41- 4201 - 900 -90 15,249.55 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 106617 04/06/90 182.40 BFI RECYCLING SYS CONTRACTED SERVICE 10- 4226 - 507 -50 106617 04/06/90 33,348.15 BFI RECYCLING SYS RECYCLING SERVICE 10- 4226 - 507 -50 33,530.55 106618 04/02/90 112.44- BATTERY WAREHOUSE CREDIT 10- 4540 - 560 -56 5894 106B18 04/02/90 337.31 BATTERY WAREHOUSE TERMINAL 10- 4540 - 560 -56 4501 6263 106818 04/02/90 72.39 BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 5578 6406 106B18 04/09/90 34.31 BATTERY WAREHOUSE BATTERY 10- 4540 - 560 -56 7560 6551 106618 04/09/90 224.87 BATTERY WAREHOUSE BATTERY 10- 4540 - 560 -56 8211 6626 106618 04/02/90 112.44- BATTERY WAREHOUSE CREDIT 10- 4540 - 560 -56 5894 106618 04/09/90 136.92 BATTERY WAREHOUSE BEAM 10- 4540 - 560 -56 6894 6102 106818 04/02/90 337.31 BATTERY WAREHOUSE BATTERIES 10- 4540- 560 -56 6188 6386 106B18 04/02/90 112.44 BATTERY WAREHOUSE CREDIT 10- 4540 - 560 -56 5894 106618 04/02/90 64.46 BATTERY WAREHOUSE CABLE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 51 6649 1,095.13.* * * * * ** * ** -CKS 106B22 04/09/90 859.00 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 50- 4630 - 822 -82 106622 04/05/90 1,961.65 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 50- 4630 - 842 -84 106622 04/06/90 1,189.40 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 50- 4630 - 862 -86 4,010.05 * * * * ** I * ** -CKS 106825 03/30/90 100.00 BENNETT -WAYNE POLICE SERVICES 10- 4100 - 430 -42 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 04 -16 -90 PAGE 11 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. #.P.O. # MESSAGE 100.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 106627 04/10/90 54.00 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUORDELIVERY 50- 4626 - 822 -82 106627 04/10/90 54.00 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 50- 4626 - 822 -82 106627 04/10/90 54.00- BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUORDELIVERY 50- 4626 - 822 -82 106B27 04/10/90 150.00 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 50- 4626 - 842 -84 106B27 04/10/90 193.00 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 50- 4626 - 862 -86 397.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 106B30 04/03/90 7.65 BERTELSON BROS. INC. PAPER 10- 4504 - 120 -12 555918 106B30 04/03/90 4.50 BERTELSON BROS. INC. PENS /INDEX CARDS 10- 4504 - 140 -14 555918 106830 04/05/90 20.81 BERTELSON BROS. INC. DISKETTES 10- 4504 - 160 -16 556395 106830 04/03/90 23.62 BERTELSON BROS. INC. BINDERS 10- 4504 - 160 -16 555918 106B30 04/09/90 9.60 BERTELSON BROS. INC. DESK PENS 10- 4504 - 200 -20 557929 106B30 04/09/90 13.34 BERTELSON BROS. INC. -PENS 10- 4504 - 510 -51 557929 106630 04/03/90 54.35 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 555918 106830 04/05/90 34.40 BERTELSON BROS. INC. FOLDERS 10- 4504 - 510 -51 556401 106830 04/09/90 40.72 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516- 600 -60 557929 106630 04/03/90 124.94 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 555136 6742 333.93 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 196892 106832 94¢19f99 95.25- BEST 69GK 9F MP66 5999 5917 04/10/90 8.80 BEST LOCK OF MPLS 69GK KEYS 10 4549 529 52 10- 4540 - 520 -52 1439 1429 106B32 04110190 95.25 BEST LOCK OF MPLS LOCK SET 10- 4540 - 646 -64 1430 5999 106632 04/10/90 40.00 BEST LOCK OF MPLS SERVICE CALL 40- 4248 - 804 -80 2671 6630 144.05* -289- -ate * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 106B35 04/06/90 32.50 BARTLEY LINDSAY CO REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 6918 32.50 * * ** -CKS 106B42 04/10/90 14.97 BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 149837 6976 14.97 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 106B46 04/09/90 77.62 BLMGT LINO /CARPET ADHESIVE /TILE 10- 4540 - 520 -52 9798 6545 77.62 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 106859 04/02/90 337.52 BFI OF MN INC GARBAGE 10- 4250 - 301 -30 106B59 04/02/90 156.70 BFI OF MN INC GARBAGE 10- 4250 - 440 -44 106B59 04/02/90 156.70 BFI OF MN INC GARBAGE 10- 4250 - 520 -52 106859 04/02/90 337.51 BFI OF MN INC GARBAGE 10- 4250- 540 -54 106659 04/02/90 52.24 BFI OF MN INC GARBAGE 23- 4250 - 612 -61 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 106859 04/02/90 156.70 INC 106B59 04/02/90 12.06 MN 106859 04/02/90 52.24 OF 106859 04/02/90 485.71 BFI 106859 04/02/90 1,329.89 GARBAGE 106B59 04/02/90 26.12 INC 106B59 04/02/90 26.12 MN INC GARBAGE 3,129.51 * 106677 04/09/90 60.00 60.00 * 106C01 03/30/90 277.87 277.87 * k k * * k k 106C17. 04/10/90 88.18 88.18 * k * k * * * 106C25 04/06/90 323.00 323.00 * * * k k k 106C30. 04/06/90 138.20 106C30 04/09/90 51.40 189.60 * 106C31 04/02/90 12,164.20 12,164.20 * 106C32 04/10/90 122.91 * k * k k * 122.91 * 106C35 04/10/90 193.00 193.00 * 106C36 04/03/90 12.25 106C36 04/03/90 12.25. 106C36, 04/03/90 12:25 k k * * * * 36.75 * 106C44 04/10/90 457.00 106C44 04/09/90 195.07 ► AND161: "703 *141342 *[ON BFI OF MN INC GARBAGE BFI OF MN INC GARBAGE BFI OF MN INC GARBAGE BFI OF MN INC GARBAGE BFI OF MN INC GARBAGE BFI OF MN INC GARBAGE BFI OF MN INC GARBAGE BRAUN ENG TESTNG INC ASBESTO ANALYSIS C & S DISTRIBUTING COST /GOODS SOLD CDP MACHINE RENTAL CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO AD FOR BIDS CITY BEER CITY BEER CITY OF BLOOMINGTON FRAN CALLAHAN BEER BEER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT MILEAGE /MARCH CITYLINE PRO SERVICES CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV WINDOW CLEANING CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV WINDOW CLEANING CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV WINDOW CLEANING COCA COLA BOTTLING COKE COCA COLA BOTTLING MIX 04 -16 -90 PAGE 12 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 27- 4250 - 662 -66 27- 4250 - 664 -66 27- 4250 - 667 -66 28- 4250 - 702 -70 30- 4250 - 782 -78 50- 4250 - 841 -84 50 -4250- 861 -86 40- 4248 - 802 -80 10216 6814 23- 4624 - 613 -61 102861 6533 10- 4504 - 540 -54 10- 4210 - 140 -14 110304 50- 4630 - 842 -84 50- 4630 - 862 -86 66- 2075 - 000 -00 10- 4208 - 480 -48 30- 4201 - 781 -78 487 6975 50- 4248 - 821 -82 50- 4248 - 841 -84 50- 4248 - 861 -86 28- 4624 - 703 -70 50- 4632 - 822 -82 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 106C44 04/06/90 * * * * ** 27- 4504 - 663 -66 106C62 04/10/90 * * * * ** 27- 4512 - 663 -66 106C64 04/06/90 106C64 04/06/90 106C64 04/06/90 106C64 04/06/90 106C64 04/06/90 * * * * * * 106C85 04/10/90 * * * * ** 6885 106C89 04/02/90 106C89 04/02/90 106C89 04/02/90 106C89 04/02/90 106C89 04/02/90 106C89 04/02/90 106C93 04/09/90 106C93 04/09/90 106C93 04/09/90 * * * * ** 106D07 04/03/90 106D07 04/03/90 106D07 04/03/90 106D07 04/03/90 106D07 04/03/90 * * * * ** 106D09 04/05/90 106D09 04/05/90 106D09 04/05/90 AMOUNT 390.77 1.042.84 380.00 380.00 18.65 303.00 129.76 22.11 1,602.66 2,076.18 23.50 23.50 8,355.00 8,355.00- 8,355.00 153.04 74.14 16.22 8,598.40 292.13 159.84 101.89 553.86 2,810.10 48.90 48.90 - 2,810.10- 48.90 48.90 10.00 14.03 16.31 40.34 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION COCA COLA BOTTLING MIX C WAYNE COURTNEY SYSCO MINNESOTA SYSCO MINNESOTA SYSCO MINNESOTA SYSCO MINNESOTA SYSCO MINNESOTA CULLIGAN CUSHMAN MOTOR CO CUSHMAN MOTOR CO CUSHMAN MOTOR CO CUSHMAN MOTOR CO CUSHMAN MOTOR CO CUSHMAN MOTOR CO CERT HYD SPEC CERT HYD SPEC CERT HYD SPEC D. C. HEY CO. D. C. HEY CO. D. C. HEY CO. D. C. HEY CO. D. C. HEY CO. DAEHN - MARCELLA DAEHN - MARCELLA DAEHN - MARCELLA SERVICES /MAY 04 -16 -90 PAGE 13 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 4632 - 842 -84 30- 4201 - 782 -78 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS CLEANING 27- 4504 - 663 -66 SILVERWARE 27- 4504 - 663 -66 491625 6524 SUPPLIES 27- 4512 - 663 -66 SUPPLIES 27- 4512 - 667 -66 FOOD 27- 4624 - 663 -66 * ** -CKS LAB TOWELS 10- 4200 - 482 -48 CUSHMAN VEHICLE CUSHMAN VEHICLE CUSHMAN VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS MOTOR VALVE PARTS 27- 1340 - 000 -00 27- 1340 - 000 -00 27- 1340 - 000 -00 27- 4540 - 664 -66 27- 4540 - 664 -66 27- 4540 - 664 -66 6 6 8257 6684 42685 6743 42589 6600 42590 6610 10- 4540 - 560 -56 70506 6869 10- 4540 - 560 -56 70088 '6635 10- 4540 - 560 -56 70089 6547 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS GENERAL SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 702 -70 160125 6885 GENERAL SUPPLIES 28- 4504- 702 -70 160125 6885 GENERAL SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 802 -80 160125 6885 GENERAL SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 802-80 160125 6885 GENERAL SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 802 -80 160125 6885 NOTARY FEE MILEAGE PLANT /ADM 10- 4204 - 140 -14 10- 4208 - 140 -14 10- 4504 - 140 -14 * ** -CKS * * * * ** * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA SIGNS EARL CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT SIDE BEVERAGE 106D27 04/06/90 87.01 BEER EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 87.01 EDINA 106D29 04/05/90 289.75 ELECTRIC CO. ELECTRICAL WORK EDINA 289.75 ELECTRICAL WORK EDINA ELECTRIC CO. SERVICE CALL 106D31 .04/09/90 180.00 * * * k * k 180.00 106D39 04/05/90 1,085.00 1,085.00 k k k k 106D47 04/06/90 16.36 16.36 k k * * * 106D61 03/30/90 100.00 100.00 kkk * k k 106D79 04/10/90 1,042.90 1,042.90 k * * * * k 1O6E14 04/09/90 217.05 1O6E14 04/03/90 54.28 52.04- 271.33 * - 9 k * * k 106E17 04/05/90 3,388.05 106E17 04/05/90 7,507.60 106E17 04/05/90 6,801.30 17,696.95 * k k * k k 106E35 04/10/90 4,891.38 106E35 04/10/90 4,978.94 - 106E35 04/10/90 4,978.94 106E35 04/10/90 83.50 4,974.88 kk * *k* CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION DAVE S FOOD WAGON MILK /DAIRY DAVIDSEN DIST. INC. BEER DAVIES WATER EQUIP HYDRANT WRENCHES DAYTONS STAFF SWIM SUITS DEPENDABLE COURIER BOND ISSUE DICK NISSEN POLICE SERVICES DORSEY & WHITNEY LEGAL TIF EARL F. ANDERSON SIGNS EARL F. ANDERSON REPAIR PLASTIC EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER EDINA ELECTRIC CO. ELECTRICAL WORK EDINA ELECTRIC CO. ELECTRICAL WORK EDINA ELECTRIC CO. ELECTRICAL WORK EDINA ELECTRIC CO. SERVICE CALL 04 -16 -90 PAGE 14 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 27- 4624 - 663 -66 5508 * ** -CKS 50- 4630 - 842 -84 *x*-CKS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 3083 6729 * ** -CKS 10- 4542 - 325 -30 95320 6875 28- 4248 - 702 -70 95387 6039 * ** -CKS 50- 4630 - 822 -82 50- 4630 - 842 -84 50- 4630 - 862 -86 27- 1300 - 005 -00 6772 27- 1300 - 005 -00 6772 27- 1300 - 005 -00 40- 4248 - 804 -80 14012 6202 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 26- 4262-'682 -68 * ** -CKS 10- 1145 - 000 -00 151467 * ** -CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4218 - 220 -22 372676 * ** -CKS 10- 4542 - 325 -30 95320 6875 28- 4248 - 702 -70 95387 6039 * ** -CKS 50- 4630 - 822 -82 50- 4630 - 842 -84 50- 4630 - 862 -86 27- 1300 - 005 -00 6772 27- 1300 - 005 -00 6772 27- 1300 - 005 -00 40- 4248 - 804 -80 14012 6202 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 106E54 04/02/90 132.31 106E54 04/02/90 70.70 203.01 * k k k * * k 106E60 04/10/90 24.38 24.38 * k k k k k k 106E71 04/09/90 62.15 106E71 03/30/90 10.45 106E71 03/30/90 115.00 106E71 04/09/90 50.85 238.45 * k k k k k k 106F11 04/09/90 10.00 10.00 * k k k k k k 106F21 04/05/90 4,977.00 4,977.00 * k k k k k k 106F37 04/10/90 77.35 kkkk * k 77.35 * 106F59 04/10/90 4.99 4.99 * k * k k k k 106F76 04/09/90 18.69 k 18.69 * k k k k k 106G01 04/09/90 786.55 106G01 04/09/90 451.85 106001, 04/09/90 234.35 - cos 106GOI 04/09/90 317.45 106G01 04/09/90 109.70 106G01 04/09/90 20.10 106G01 04/09/90 588.40 2, 508.40 *T59 -99 *kkkk k . CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION EIDE SAW & KNIFE BLADES EIDE SAW & KNIFE BLADES ELECTRIC MOTOR REP. SHAFT ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY ASPIRIN ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY TOOLS ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY TOOLS ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY SUPPLIES FEED RITE CONTROL DEMURRAGE FLANAGAN.SALES LIGHT FIXTURES FLOYD LOCK & SAFE CO LOCK ASSY FRANK J. ZAMBONI FLAHERTY EQUIP CORP G & K SERVICES G & K SERVICES G & K SERVICES G & K SERVICES G & K SERVICES G & K SERVICES G & K SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES BEARING HALF LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY CLEANING SUPPLIES LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY 04 -16 -90 PAGE 15 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4580 - 301 -30 62151 6346 10- 4580- 301 -30 61881 6355 * ** -CKS 40 -4540- 801 -80 129716 6781 10- 4504 - 301 -30 10- 4580 - 644 -64 10- 4580 - 644 -64 10- 4642 - 301 -30 6720 6384 6652 6720 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 40- 4622 - 805 -80 75520 6937 * ** -CKS 27- 4540 - 669 -66 4546 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 53402 6580 0 * ** -CKS 30- 4504 - 782 -78 15252 6473 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10-4262- 301 -30 10- 4262 - 560 -56 10- 4262 - 646 -64 10- 4512 - 540 -54 28- 4262 - 702 -70 30- 4262 - 782 -78 40- 4262 - 801 -80 * ** -CKS 6576 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA PAGE 16 ACCOUNT NO. INV. CHECK REGISTER MESSAGE CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 106G03 04/02/90 143.88 G T PARTS BULBS 27- 4630 - 662 -66 5509 143.88 * * ** -CKS kRk *kk 63092 6974 10- 4294 - 560 -56 33241 106G09 04/03/90 831.30 10- 4310 - 560 -56 GOVT TRAIN SERV PLANNING RETREAT 40- 4504 - 801 -80 390170 831.30 * 10- 4540 - 520 -52 181816 R k* R k R 10- 4540 - 520 -52 172110 6209 106G15 04/10/90 28.00 GEM TAP SERV BEER LINES 5939 28.00 * 6335 106G24 04/10/90 84.00 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 106G24 04/10/90 286.25 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS MAINT CONTRACT 370.25 * R R k R R R 106G32 04/09/90 95.00 GOPHER STATE 1 CALL LOCATIONS 106G32 04/09/90 250.00 GOPHER STATE 1 CALL LOCATIONS 345.00 * R R R R R R 106G38 03/30/90 100.00 GEORGE BUTLER POLICE SERVICES k R R R k R 100.00 * 106G42 03/30/90 143.35 GIL HEBARD GUNS AMMO 106642 03/30/90 127.00 GIL HEBARD GUNS TARGETS 270.35 * k k k k k k 106G44 04/10/90 100.00 GLEN SIPE PIANO SERV PRO SERVICES 100.00 * R R R k R k 106G46 04/03/90 50.00 GARVENS GREETINGS GREETING CARDS 50.00 * R k R R R R 106G68 04/10/90 45.54- GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. CREDIT 106G68 04/10/90 55.87 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. ELECTRIC PARTS 106G68 04/10/90 45.54 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. ELECTRIC PARTS 106G68 04/10/90. 113.19- GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. CREDIT 106G68 04/10/90 285.56 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. ELECTRIC PARTS 106G68 04/10/90 253.86 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. ELECTRIC PARTS 04 -16 -90 PAGE 16 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4540 - 560-56 28656 6405 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 100 -10 7245 6583 29- 4648 - 722 -72 * ** -CKS 27- 4630 - 662 -66 5509 * ** -CKS 10- 4294 - 560 -56 63092 6974 10- 4294 - 560 -56 33241 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 10- 4310 - 560 -56 390170 40- 4504 - 801 -80 390170 * ** -CKS 10- 4100- 430 -42 * ** -CKS 29- 4572 - 722 -72 21470 6583 29- 4648 - 722 -72 21470 6583 * ** -CKS 30- 4201 - 782 -78 900405 6974 * ** -CKS 50- 4632 - 862 -86 2141 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 181816 10- 4540 - 520 -52 172110 6209 10- 4540 - 520 -52 173336 6253 10- 4540 - 520 -52 180116 5939 40- 4540 - 802 -80 175964 6335 40- 4540 - 802 -80 175977 6336 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE xxxxxx 106G79 04/10/90 xxxxxx 106G88 04/06/90 xxxxxx 106H09 04/09/90 ,ixxxxx 106H21 04/09/90 106H21 04/02/90 106H21 04/02/90 10BH22 03/30/90 xxxxxx 106H28 04/09/90 106H28 04/09/90 xxxxxx GENERAL SUPPLIES 106H30 04/10/90 x *xxxx 106H33 04/02/90 106H34 04/09/90 xxxxxx 106H36 04/10/90 xxxxxx 106H56 04/02/90 106H56 04/02/90 04 -16 -90 PAGE 17 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 27- 4100 - 661 -66 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 641 -64 * ** -CKS 10- 4618 - 560 -56 51726 6562 * ** -CKS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 6700 10- 4248 - 560 -56 198100 6420 10- 4540- 560 -56 208627 6642 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 33400 6627 41- 4504 - 900 -90 8571 6508 * ** -CKS 28- 4248 - 702 -70 6971 * ** -CKS 10- 4274 - 420 -42 10- 4600 - 180 -18 * ** -CKS 10- 4510 - 440 -44 720 5058 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 125249 6354 10- 4540 - 520 -52 125272 6381 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 482.10 5,000.00 GREUPNER -JOE PAYMENT 5,000.00 565.00 GRUBER POWER EQUIP GENERAL SUPPLIES 565.00 134.40 HALLMAN GEAR OIL 134.40 159.81 HARMON GLASS WINDSHIELD 27.69 HARMON GLASS GLASS 60.13 HARMON GLASS TINTED GLASS 247.63 * 100.00 HAROLD SWANSON POLICE SERVICES 100.00 * 73.70 HAYDEN- MURPHY EQUIP SEALING RING 389.00 HAYDEN- MURPHY EQUIP GENERAL SUPPLIES 462.7.0 * 143.00 HARMON GLASS & GLAZE REPAIR WINDOW 143.00 * 148.53 HENN CTY SHERIFF EQUIP MAINT 148.53 * 19.17 HENN COUNTY TREAS. PCT 20 LABELS 19.17 * 407.02 HENN CTY MED CENTER AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 407.02 * 13.49 HIRSHFIELDS PAINT 13.49 HIRSHFIELDS PAINT 04 -16 -90 PAGE 17 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 27- 4100 - 661 -66 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 641 -64 * ** -CKS 10- 4618 - 560 -56 51726 6562 * ** -CKS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 6700 10- 4248 - 560 -56 198100 6420 10- 4540- 560 -56 208627 6642 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 33400 6627 41- 4504 - 900 -90 8571 6508 * ** -CKS 28- 4248 - 702 -70 6971 * ** -CKS 10- 4274 - 420 -42 10- 4600 - 180 -18 * ** -CKS 10- 4510 - 440 -44 720 5058 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 125249 6354 10- 4540 - 520 -52 125272 6381 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 04 -16 -90 PAGE 18 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 106H56 04/02/90 32.07 HIRSHFIELDS PAINT 10- 4540 - 520 -52 140876 6496 106H56 04/02/90 26.98 HIRSHFIELDS PAINT 10- 4540 - 520 -52 125080 6267 86.03 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 106H65 03/30/90 100.00 HOFFMAN- WILLIAM POLICE SERVICES 10- 4100 - 430 -42 100.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 106H74 04/05/90 46.64 HOOTEN CLEANERS LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 420 -42 46.64 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 106I45 04/10/90 95.00 INGMAN LAB INC. SERVICES 10- 4200 - 482 -48 6528 95.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 106J09 03/30/90 2,478.00 J.H. LARSON ELEC LIGHT POLES 60- 1300 - 032 -11 4440 2,478.00 * * * * * ** * *w -CKS 106J23 04/05/90 131.19 JR JOHNSON SUP GREENHOUSE SUPP 10- 4504 - 643 -64 58351 6558 131.19 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 106J27 03/30/90 25.93 JERRYS FOODS GENERAL SUPPLIES 23- 4504 - 611 -61 106J27 04/05/90 27.62 JERRYS FOODS GENERAL SUPPLIES 23- 4504 - 611 -61 106J27 03/30/90 26.66 JERRYS FOODS GENERAL SUPPLIES 23- 4504 - 611 -61 80.21 * * * * ** *x*-CKS 106J31 04/05/90 8.69 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 106J31 04/05/90 65.43 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -.30 106J31 04/05/90 47.48 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 322 -30 106J31 04/05/90 42.16 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 325 -30 106J31 04/05/90 12.73 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 106J31 04/05/90 85.19 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 440 -44 106J31 04/05/90 56.55 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 520 -52 106J31 04/05/90 45.76 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 540 -54 106J31 04/05/90 34.53 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 560 -56 106J31 04/05/90 195.11 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 646 -64 106J31 04/05/90 85.47 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 661 -66 106J31 04/05/90 24.37 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 667 -66 106J31 04/05/90 14.94 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504- 782 -78 106J31 04/05/90 435.48 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 106J31 04/05/90 20.39 JERRYS HARDWARE TOOLS 40- 4580 - 801 -80 106J31' 04/05/90 30.53 JERRYS HARDWARE . GENERAL SUPPLIES 50- 4504 - 841 -84 1,204.81 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT kkitkkk 1OBJ35 03/30/90 36.90 36.90 * R k k k k k 106J47 04/10/90 210.00 210.00 k* k k k k 106J59 04/10/90 490.00 490.00 * k k k k k k 106J74 04/06/90 51.89 51.89 * k*kk ** 106J99 04/10/90 40.00 k k k k k 40.00 * 106KO9 04/09/90 165.35 106KO9 04/09/90 31.85 197.20 * k k k k k k 106K23 04/05/90 336.00 106K23 04/05/90 268.80 k k k k k k 604.80 106K35 03/30/90 167.37 106K35 04/10/90 38.86 106K35 04/10/90 74.37 106K35 04/10/90 218.68 106K35 04/10/90 20.56 106K35 03/30/90 40.26 106K35 04/10/90 44.04 106K35 03/30/90 52.24 106K35 04/05/90 46.72 106K35 04/10/90 188.24 106K35 04/10/90 76.81 106K35 04/10/90 6.98 106K35 04/09/90 8.49 106K35 03/30/90 59.60 106K35 04/05/90 37.14 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION JERRYS.PRINTING JERRYS LSCAPE MAINT JOHN H EKLUND JUSTUS LUMBER PRINT SNOW PLOW.CONTRACT RUBBISH /DUMP PAINT /LUMBER JANET CANTON MILEAGE /LOGIS KAMAN BEARING.& SPLY PARTS KAMAN BEARING & SPLY BALL BEARING KELLY SERVICES KELLY SERVICES KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT SERVICES SERVICES CEILING TILE GENERAL SUPPLIES PLYWOOD PLYWOOD INSULATION PLBG PARTS LUMBER LUMBER LUMBER LUMBER LUMBER DRAWING BOARDS COST /GOODS SOLD LUMBER LUMBER 04 -16 -90 PAGE 19 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 23- 4600 - 611 -61 504108 6754 * k k - C K S 50- 4248 - 841 -84 7250 * ** -CKS 10- 4250 - 644 -64 * ** -CKS 30- 4544 - 782 -78, 41208 6609 * ** -CKS 10- 4208 - 160 -16 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 6629 10- 4540 - 560 -56 6527 10- 4201 - 140 -14 10- 4201 - 140 -14 10- 4504 - 646 -64 613178 10- 4504 - 646 -64 606834 10- 4540 - 540 -54 600845 10- 4540 - 540 -54 638437 10- 4540 - 540 -54 600874 10- 4540- 646 -64 600922 10- 4604 - 644 -64 606449 10- 4604 - 646 -64 600523 10- 4604 - 646 -64 612938 10- 4604 - 646 -64 613097 10- 4604 - 646 -64 606.479 23- 4588 - 611 -61 613253 23- 4624 - 613 -61 612921 27- 4540 - 667 -66 600448 27- 4540 - 667 -66 637881 6786 6876 6632 6574 6660 6579 6846 6661 6812 6868 6908 6723 6802 6688 5955 * ** -CKS * * * -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 106K35 04/06/90 106K35 04/06/90 106K35 04/06/90 106K35 04/03/90 * * * * ** VENDOR 106K57 04/09/90 106K57 04/09/90 * * * * ** 27.64 106L02 04/06/90 * ** * ** 27'- 4604'- 662 -66 106L10 04/10/90 * * * * ** 106L28 04/09/90 106L28 04/03/90 106L28 04/09/90 106L28 04/09/90 106L28 04/09/90 10BL28 04/03/90 106L28 04/03/90 106L28 04/09/90 106L28 04/09/90 106L28 04/09/90 106L28 04/03/90 106L28 04/09/90 106L28 04/03/90 106L28 04/09/90 106L28 04/03/90 106L28 04/03/90 106L28 04/03/90 106L28 04/09/90 106L28 04/03/90 106L28 04/09/90 106L28 04/09/90 * * * * ** 10604 04/09/90 * * * * ** 106L46 04/06/90 CHECK REGISTER 04 -16 -90 PAGE 20 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 27.64 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER 27'- 4604'- 662 -66 613379 6764 21.80 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER 27- 4604 - 662 -66 600532 6737 19.44 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER 27- 4604 - 662-66 613044 6819 21.99 KNOX COMM_CREDIT SUPPLIES 28- 4248 - 702 -70 613109 6818 1,171.23 * ** -CKS 2,890.70 KUETHER DIST. CO. BEER 50- 4630 - 822 -82 5,811.25 KUETHER DIST. CO. BEER 50- 4630 - 842 -84 8,701.95 * ` * ** -CKS 425.74 LABOR RELATIONS ASN. LABOR SERVICES 10- 4201- 440 -44 425.74 * * ** -CKS 107.50 LAKELAND ENGINEERING AIR VALVE 40- 4540 - 802 -80 L83598 6491 107.50 * ** -CKS 250.52 LAWSON PRODUCTS TIE STRAP 10- 4504- 301 -30 6557 67.18 LAWSON PRODUCTS SCRAPER /FILE 10- 4504 - 301 -30 6329 351.39 LAWSON PRODUCTS BITS /SAWS 10- 4504 - 301 -30 6395 266.87 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 6326 374.27 LAWSON PRODUCTS ELEC CONN 10- 4504 - 322 -30 6556 298.82 LAWSON PRODUCTS MATERIAL SUPPLIY 10- 4504 - 322 -30 6330 186.93 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 325 -30 6351 150.01 LAWSON PRODUCTS RIVETS /WASHERS 10- 4504 - 335 -30 6392 401.20 LAWSON PRODUCTS FASTERNERS 10- 4504 - 335 -30 6554 401.28 LAWSON PRODUCTS TIE STTRAPS 10- 4504 - 646 -64 6553 318.02 LAWSON PRODUCTS CARRIAGE BOLTS 10- 4504 - 646 -64 6178 244.39 LAWSON PRODUCTS BITS 10- 4580 - 301 -30 6393 468.57 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 6180 436.95 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 6394 489.88 LAWSON PRODUCTS LOCKS /WASHERS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 6328 112.96 LAWSON PRODUCTS SCREWS /GLUE TAPE 10- 4620 - 560 -56 6180 318.20 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 6178 196.89 LAWSON PRODUCTS WASHER ASST 40- 4504 - 801 -80 6555 288.86 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 6327 250.52 LAWSON PRODUCTS WASHER 40- 4540 - 801 -80 6391 164.71 LAWSON PRODUCTS FASTENERS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 6396 6,038.42 * * ** -CKS 23.97 LEEF BROS. INC. LAUNDRY 27- 4262 - 664 -66 23.97 * * ** -CKS 60.13 LIEN INFECTION CON SANITATION 27- 4201 - 663 -66 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 04 -16 -90 PAGE 21 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 106L46 03/30/90 86.23 LIEN INFECTION CON' CONT MAINT 27- 4288 - 667 -66 161170 6826 146.36 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 106L56 04/06/90 12.30 LINHOFF BATTERY 10- 4504-260 -26 168685 12.30 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 10606 04/05/90 1,725.63 LYLE SIGNS INC. SIGN INVENTORY 10- 4542 - 325 -30 745 5211 1,725.63 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 106L97 03/30/90 100.00 MERFELD -BERT POLICE SERVICES 10- 4100 - 430 -42 100.00 * ** -CKS 106M01 04/09/90 330.88 M & I IND SUPPLY SAFETY GLASS 10- 4642 - 301 -30 3604 6637 330.88 * 106M02 04/09/90 246.00 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. BROOM FOR SWEEPER 10- 4534 - 310 -30 A2231 6711 106M02 04/05/90 602.30 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. GEAR COUPLER 10- 4540- 560 -56 3627 6712 106M02 04/02/90 165.52 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. WATER PUMP 10- 4540 - 560 -56 3110 6252 1,013.82 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 106M07 04/05/90 3,360.28 MARK VII SALES BEER 50- 4630 - 822 -82 106M07 04/06/90 5,981.45 MARK VII SALES BEER 50- 4630 - 842 -84 106M07 04/09/90 5,506.42 MARK VII SALES BEER 50- 4630 - 862 -86 14,848.15 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 106M19 04/05/90 80.60 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 6672 80.60 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 106M22 04/09/90 200.42 MCNEILUS STEEL STEEL 10- 4504 - 646 -64 57216 6792 106M22 04/03/90 328.20 MCNEILUS STEEL STEEL MATERIAL 10- 4504 = 646 -64 52197 6414 106M22 04/09/90 451.57 MCNEILUS STEEL MATERIAL 10- 4540 - 560 -56 54399 6575 106M22 04/09/90 375.90 MCNEILUS STEEL ANGLE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 54764 6636 106M22 04/09/90 122.21- MCNEILUS STEEL CREDIT 10- 4540 - 560 -56 954764 6636 106M22 04/03/90 355.58 MCNEILUS STEEL STREET 10- 4620 - 560 -56 52196 6410 106M22 04/03/90 323.34 MCNEILUS STEEL PIPE CHANNEL 10- 4620 - 560 -56 50450 6338 106M22 04/09/90 494.08 MCNEILUS STEEL FLANGE 40- 4504 - 803 -80 52448 6488 2,406.88 * 106M23 04/10/90 75.00 MARKETING FACTORS FMI CONFERENCE 50- 4206- 840 -84 106M23 04/10/90 77.24 MARKETING FACTORS FMI CONFERENCE 50- 4206 - 860 -86 152.24 * 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE * * * * ** 106M56 04/09/90 * * * * ** 106M27 04/09/90 106M27 04/02/90 106M27 04/02/90 106M27 04/09/90 106M27 04/09/90 106M27 03/30/90 106M27 04/10/90 106M27 03/30/90 106M27 04/06/90 106M27 04/03/90 106M27 04/09/90 106M27 04/02/90 106M27 04/02/90 106M27 04/02/90 * * * * ** 106M29 04/10/90 106M29 04/10/90 k k k k * * 106M32 04/05/90 106M32 04/10/90 * * * k * * 106M35 04/06/90 106M36 04/10/90 106M36 04/10/90 106M37 03/30/90 106M46 04/06/90 106M46 04/06/90 106M46 04/03/90 * * * * ** 106M56 04/09/90 * * * * ** CHECK REGISTER 04 -16 -90 PAGE 22 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 182.60 MERIT SUPPLY SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 325 -30 23944 66728 453.25 MERIT SUPPLY SOIL STERILANT 10- 4504 - 365 -30 23872 6559 379.70 MERIT SUPPLY MISC SUPPLIES 10- 4512 - 540 -54 23814 6407 327.25 MERIT SUPPLY PRESSURE WASH 10- 4620 - 560 -56 23958 6784 467.50 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANER 10- 4620 - 560 -56 23907 6654 137.40 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 23- 4512 - 612 -61 23890 6637 98.00 MERIT SUPPLY MATS 27- 4504 - 662 -66 24012 6958 95.50 MERIT SUPPLY TRASH BAGS 27- 4512 - 667 -66 23780 6825 90.30 MERIT SUPPLY TRASH BAGS 27- 4512 - 667 -66 23403 5441 326.05 MERIT,SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 28- 4512 - 702 -70 23919 6740 407.50 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 30- 4512 - 782 -78 23982 6889 414.00 MERIT SUPPLY WYP ALLS 40- 4504 - 801 -80 23824 6504 414.00 MERIT SUPPLY WYP ALLS 40- 4504 - 801 -80 23808 6409 138.00 MERIT SUPPLY WYP ALLS 40- 4504 - 802 -80 23807 6408 3,931.05 * * ** -CKS 144.00 MESSERLI & KRAMER AMBULANCE COLLECTION 10- 3180 - 000 -00 22.00 MESSERLI & KRAMER AMBULANCE COLLECTION 10- 3180 - 000 -00 166.00 * * ** -CKS 99.29 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4634 - 862 -86 127.88 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4634 - 862 -86 227.17 * * ** -CKS 40,986.00 METRO WASTE CONTROL RESERVE CAP 10- 3095- 490 -49 40,986.00 * 295.00 MINVALCO MOD MOTOR 10- 4540 - 540 -54 30854 6570 58.64 MINVALCO SWITCH /RELAY 10- 4540 - 560 -56 31200 6932 353.64 * 75.00 MGA DUES 27- 4204 - 661 -66 6817 75.00 * * ** -CKS 61.04 METZ BAKING CO BREAD 27- 4624 - 663 -66 19.86 METZ BAKING CO BREAD 27- 4624 - 663 -66 11.00 METZ BAKING CO COST OF GOODS 28- 4624 - 703 -70 91.90 * ** -CKS 75.00 MILLER TOWING TOWING 10- 4248 - 560 -56 39061 6810 75.00 * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 04 -16 -90 PAGE 23 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO, INV, # P.O. # MESSAGE 106M58 04/10/90 515.00 MILLIPORE LAB FILTERS 10- 4504 - 482 -48 36061 6617 515.00 kkkkkk * ** -CKS 106M63 04/09/90 208.02 MN. BAR MIX 50- 4632 - 822 -82 106M63 04/06/90 177.44 MN. BAR MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 106M63 04/09/90 264.90 MN. BAR MIX 50- 4632 - 862 -86 650.36 kkkkkk kkk -CKS 106M69 04/09/90 67.50 68.5T- MCC /MIDWEST CRAFT SUPPLIES 23- 4588 - 611 -61 36822 6668 8- 1 67.50* 106M70 04/10/90 45.00 MN. CONWAY REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 440 -44 14752 106M70 04/10/90 57.00 MN. CONWAY FACE SHIELDS 10- 4504 - 440 -44 15142 102.00 kkkkkk * ** -CKS 106M76 04/03/90 220.85 MN. GLOVE RAINSUIT 10- 4642 - 301 -30 41463 6550 106M76 04/03/90 303.40 MN. GLOVE GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 41355 6509 106M76 04/09/90 113.64 MN. GLOVE GLOVES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 41982 6793 637.89 k k k k k k - * ** -CKS 106M80 04/06/90 104.83 MN SUBURBAN NEWS AD FOR BIDS 10- 4210 - 140 -14 87217 106M80 04/06/90 21.24 MN SUBURBAN NEWS AD FOR BIDS 10- 4210 - 140 -14 87216 106M80 04/06/90 16.87 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ORD PUBLICATION 10- 4210 - 140 -14 87214 106M80 03/30/90 57.41 MN SUBURBAN NEWS AD FOR BIDS 10- 4210 - 140 -14 87139 106M80 04/06/90 49.91 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ORD PUBLICATION 10- 4210 - 140 -14 106M80 04/09/90 1,735.00 MN SUBURBAN NEWS OUTSIDE PRINTING 30- 4600 - 781 -78 5283 1,985.26 * 106M81 04/09/90 3,850.00 MN. TORO INC. NEW VEHICLE 27- 1340 - 000 -00 104204 6311 106M81 04/09/90 1,410.00 MN. TORO INC. NEW EQUIPMENT 27- 1340 - 000 -00 104015 6592 5,260.00 * kkkkkk kkk -CKS 106M85 04/10/90 15.00 MN. WANNER REPAIR WORK 10- 4504 - 301 -30 74040 15.00 * k k k k k k k k k - C K S 106M90- 04/09/90 120.50 MODEL STONE CO. BLOCKS 10- 4540- 540 -54 198604 6516 106M90 04/02/90 21.28 MODEL STONE CO. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 198536 6248 141.78 k k k k k k k k k - C K S 106NO3 04/09/90 700.00 MPLS SEWER & WATER SERVICE LINE REPAIR 40- 4248 - 803 -80 21019 6856 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 106NO3 04/03/90 270.00 MPLS SEWER & WATER STOP BOX REPAIRS k k k k k k 970.00 * 106N05 04/10/90 770.00 MTKA. IRON WORK PLANS 770.00 * k * k k 106N07 04/03/90 300.00 MTS NW SOUND MACH /EQUIP 106N07 04/03/90 350.00 MTS NW SOUND PRO SERV k k k k k k 650.00 106N13 04/10/90 43.45 MUZAK MUZAK 106N13 04/10/90 43.45 MUZAK MUZAK 86.90 F k k k* k 106N22 04/03/90 70.00- NATL GUARDIAN SYS. ALARM REPAIR 106N22 04/03/90 70.00 NATL GUARDIAN SYS. ALARM REPAIR 106N22 04/03/90 70.00 NATL GUARDIAN SYS. ALARM REPAIR 70.00 k k * k * * 106N68 04/05/90 88.56 NORTHSTAR ICE MIX 106N68 04/05/90 153.90 NORTHSTAR ICE MIX 106N68 04/05/90 162.00 NORTHSTAR ICE ICE * k k k k 404.46 106N72 04/09/90 1,961.07 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES * k k k k k 1,961.07 106N82 03/30/90 409.75 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST /GOODS SOLD k k k k k 409.75 106N96 04/10/90 67.00 MINN COMM PAGING SERVICE CONTRACT 106N96 04/10/90 67.00- MINN COMM PAGING SERVICE CONTRACT 106N96 04/10/90 67.00 MINN COMM PAGING SESRVICE CONTRACT 67.00 106017 04/05/90 16.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 16.00 * 04 -16 -90 PAGE 24 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 40- 4248 - 803 -80 21018 6837 * ** -CKS 27- 1300 - 005 -00 10375 6952 * ** -CKS 30 -1340- 782 -78 81994 6880 30- 4201- 782 -78 81922 6879 * ** -CKS 50- 4214 - 822 -82 50- 4214 - 862 -86 50- 4301 - 841 -84 218816 50- 4301 - 841 -84 218816 50- 4304 - 841 -84 218816 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 50- 4632 - 822 -82 50- 4632 - 842 -84 50- 4632 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS 10- 4616 - 560 -56 * ** -CKS 23- 4624- 613 -61 170477 6532 * ** -CKS 30- 4233 - 782 -78 44535 30- 4233 - 782 -78 44535 30- 4288 - 782 -78 44535 * ** -CKS 30- 45'16- 781 -78 108107 6894 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 04.16 -90 PAGE 25 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE wwwwww ** *_CKS 106024 04/05/90 377.00 OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING 10- 4600 - 420 -42 30755 6446 106024 04/05/90 470.00 OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING 10- 4600 - 420 -42 30756 6751 847.00 wwwww* * ** -CKS 106030 04/10/90 30.84 OLD DUTCH FOODS CHIPS 27- 4624 - 663 -66 5514 30.84 wwwwww * ** -CKS 106038 04/03/90 200.00 OLSON FIRE PRO. INSTALL AIR SWITCH 10- 4540 - 540 -54 8726 6647 200.00 * ** -CKS 106P11 04/09/90 509.50 PARK NIC MED CTR SHOTS 10- 4201 - 420 -42 509.50 wwwwww * ** -CKS 106P30 04/09/90 159.17 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING MIX 50- 4632 - 822 -82 106P30 04/06/90 244.23 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 106P30 04/09/90 .112.19 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING MIX 50- 4632 - 862 -86 515.59 106P31 04/02/90 500.00 PETER COTTON PRO SERV 10- 4201 - 440 -44 500.00 wwwwww * ** -CKS 106P58 04/03/90 27.20 PLUNKETTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 702 -70 740926 27.20 wwwwww * ** -CKS 106P75 04/05/90 80.00 PREMIER OUTDOOR SERV PRO SERV 30- 4201 - 782 -78 1179 6893 80.00 wwwww * ** -CKS 106P78 04/10/90 104.00 PRINTERS SERV INC SHARPENING 28- 4274 - 704 -70 48684 - 104.00 wwwwww - ** *_CKS 106P80 PRIOR LAKE AGGREGATE X86 -9 $,4- 04/05/90 798.80 PRIOR WINE G914P NY SAND 10- 4522 - 318 -30 1042 798.80 wwwwww * *.* -CKS 106P84 04/05/90 94.83 PRO INSTANT PRINT PLBG PERMITS APPL 10- 4504- 490 -49 32055 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT x x x k x x 27- 4248 - 663 -66 94.83 7039 106Q09 04/10/90 95.97 7038 106Q09 04/10/90 64.48 7037 106Q09 04/10/90 105.50 6821 106Q09 04/10/90 1,416.60 6552 FILTERS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 1,682.55 * xkxxkx 10- 4540 - 646 -64 17176 6924 106Q20 04/02/90 7.09 6808 106Q20 04/02/90 127.74 5057 xxxxxx 134.83 * 106Q22 04/03/90 148.32 - 106Q22 04/03/90 148.32 106Q22 04/03/90 149.32 xxxxxk 149.32 106R12 04/10/90 19.85 106R12 04/09/90 19.85 - ei .i4- 106R12 04/10/90 6.25 106R12 04/02/90 6.25 6.66 106R12 04/09/90 10.34 - 106R12 04/10/90 10.34 106R12 04/10/90 229.90 106R12 04/10/90 8.95 311.73* Bi-* 106R13 04/10/90 132.00 132.00 xxxxxx 106R22 04/10/90 209.40 xxxxxx 209.40 * 106R25 04/02/90 329.00 329.00 * xxxxkx 106R33 04/09/90 4,030.15 106R33 04/09/90 6,314.20 106R33 04/09/90 3,942.10 14,286.45 xkxkkx CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION QUALITY REFRIG QUALITY REFRIG QUALITY REFRIG QUALITY REFRIG QUICK SERV BATTERY QUICK SERV BATTERY QUIK PRINT QUIK PRINT QUIK PRINT RADIO SHACK RADIO SHACK RADIO SHACK RADIO SHACK RADIO SHACK RADIO SHACK RADIO SHACK RADIO SHACK RADIO INSTALLS REM SUPPLIES RENTAL EQUIP & SALES REX DISTR. REX DISTR. REX DISTR. 04 -16 -90 PAGE 26 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS REPAIRS 27- 4248 - 663 -66 68361 7039 REPAIRS 27- 4248 - 663 -66 68362 7038 SERVICE CALL 27- 4248 - 663 -66 68365 7037 ICE MACHINE 27- 4248 - 663 -66 068457 6821 FILTERS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 35749 6552 FILTERS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 35737 6405 SHOW PRINTING 28- 4600 - 701 -70 37450 6775 SHOW PRINTING 28- 4600 - 701 -70 37450 6775 SHOW PRINTING 28- 4600 - 701 -70 37450 6775 WALL PLATE 10- 4540- 520 -52 16270 6624 WALL PLATES 10- 4540- 520 -52 16270 6624 ELECTRONIC PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 15847 6506 BATTERY /KNIFE SWITCH 10- 4540 - 540 -54 15847 6506 BULBS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 16748 6794 LAMPS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 016748 6794 ALARM 10- 4540 - 646 -64 17176 6924 ADAPTOR 40- 4540 - 802 -80 16956 6808 RADIO RENTAL 10- 4226 - 440 -44 16752 5057 GENERAL SUPPLIES CHAIN SAW BEER BEER BEER 30- 4504 - 782 -78 1062 6973 10-4580- 644 -64 11663 6717 50- 4630 - 822 -82 50- 4630 - 842 -84 50- 4630 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 106R37 03/30/90 8,430.00 RIDDLE CONTROL PROD. CONTROLLER' 8,430.00 * R R R R R R 106R39 04/03/90 716.26 RIEDELL SHOES MACH /EQUIP R RRR R4 716.26 * 106R81 03/30/90 70.64 RUBENSTEIN & ZIFF CRAFT SUPPLIES 70.64 * R R R R R R 106S10 04/02/90 194.84 SUBURBAN TIRE & AUTO TIRES 194.84 RRRRRR 106S15 04/09/90 127.10 SEARS - BELTS R R R R R R 127.10 106S19 04/02/90 198.49 SEELYE PLASTICS PUC PIPING 106S19 04/09/90 29.72 SEELYE PLASTICS PUC PIPING 228.21 RRRRRR 106S27 03/30/90 24.17 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 106S27 04/09/90 32.04 SHERWIN WILLIAMS MATERIAL R R R R R R 56.21 106S34 04/10/90 15.85 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 15.85 106S36 04/06/90 3,333.45 SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO. BEER 106S36 04/05/90 9,589.55 SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO. BEER 12,923.00 R R R R R R 106S45 04/05/90 42.62 ST. PAUL BOOK OFFICE SUPPLIES 106S45 03/30/90 116.34 ST. PAUL BOOK OFFICE SUPPLIES 158.96 R R R R R R 106S50 03/30/90 100.00 JOHN SHEPARD POLICE SERVICES 04 -16 -90 PAGE 27 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4274- 330 -30 900304 6249 * ** -CKS 30- 1340 - 782 -78 30174 6750 * ** -CKS 23- 4588 - 611 -61 161118 6534 * ** -CKS 10- 4616- 560 -56 7397 6566 * ** -CKS 10- 4504- 325 -30 6572 * ** -CKS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 167850 6625 40- 4540 - 801 -80 169127 6804 * ** -CKS 10- 4544 - 646 -64 6507 40- 4504 - 801 -80 18248 6701 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 235177 * ** -CKS 50- 4630 - 822 -82 50- 4630 - 842 -84 * ** -CKS 27- 4516 - 667 -66 920316 6907 27 -4516- 667 -66 021610 6458 * ** -CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 04 -16 -90 PAGE 28 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 100.00 * ** -CKS 106S61 04/06/90 2,577.83 STATE TREASURER BLDG REPORT 10- 3095 - 490 -49 106S61 04/06/90 99.00 STATE TREASURER BLDG REPORT 10- 3113-490 -49 2,676.83 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 106S72 04/02/90 103.9-4 STREICHERS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 M69728 6770 106S72 04/05/90 12.20 STREICHERS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 M6939 6770 116.14 106S73 04/10/90 2,173.96 STRGAR - ROSCOE -FAUSH PRO ENG SERVICES 60- 1300 - 291 -04 2,173.96 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 106S77 04/10/90 307.55 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR DOOR 10- 4248 - 560 -56 7066 106S77 04/10/90 16.54 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET MANIFOLD 10- 4540 - 560 -56 123452 106S77 04/10/90 39.93 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET BELT 10- 4540 - 560 -56 123242 364.02 106S78 04/09/90 101.99 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP FITTINGS 10- 4504 - 646 -64 6714 106S78 04/10/90 223.80 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP PLBG PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 6273 106S78 04/03/90 55.63- SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP CREDIT 10- 4540 - 540 -54 106S78 04/09/90 138.13 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP TUBES 10- 4540 - 540 -54 6719 106S78 04/03/90 177.00 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP TUBE CUTTER 10- 4540 - 540 -54 6479 106578 04/09/90 33.95 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP PLBG SUPPLIES 10- 4540 - 540 -54 6732 106S78 04/09/90 41.76 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP SUPPLIES 10- 4540 - 540 -54 6706 106S78 04/10/90 426.82 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP PLBG PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 6271 106S78 04/10/90 228.83 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP PLBG PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 6254 106S78 04/10/90 426.20 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP PLBG PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 6272 106S78 04/09/90 42.96- SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP HANDLE ASSEMBLY 10- 4540 - 560 -56 106S78 03/30/90 163.31 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP PLBG PARTS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 6714 106578 04/09/90 216.11 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP MISC SUPPLIES 40- 4540 - 803 -80 6697 106S78 04/10/90 222.98 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP PLBG PARTS 50- 4540 - 861 -86 6724 2,302.29 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 106581 04/09/90 150.00 SUN ELECTRIC TOOL CALIBRATION 10- 4580 - 560 -56 6779 150.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 106583 04/09/90 28.80 SUPERAMERICA GAS 10- 4612 - 560 -56 62533 28.80 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 106T05 04/02/90 102.50 THE PRINT SHOP FUTURE COMM 10- 4201 - 500 -50 91435 106T05 04/03/90 490.00 THE PRINT SHOP PRINTING 10- 4212 - 510 -51 91389 6762 106T05 04/03/90 68.00 THE PRINT SHOP PRINTNG 10- 4504- 260 -26 90696 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 04 -16 -90 PAGE 29 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 106T05 03/30/90 63.00 THE PRINT SHOP PRINTING 10- 4600 - 180 -18 91434 723.50 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 106TOS 04/05/90 21.76 TARGET WALL CLOCK 10- 4504 - 440 -44 21.76 x *xxxx * ** -CKS 106T11 03/30/90 130.40 TESSMAN SEED & CHEM. CHEMICALS 10 -4558- 643 -64 46106 6703 106T11 04/03/90 1,259.50 TESSMAN SEED & CHEM. GRASS SEED 10- 4568 - 643 -64 46774 6702 106T11 04/10/90 107.25 TESSMAN SEED & CHEM. GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 47094 6771 1,497.15 *xx *xx * *x -CKS 106T16 04/02/90 92.86 TIERNEY BROS INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 600 -60 48585 6828 1OBT16 04/06/90 69.95 TIERNEY BROS INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 600 -60 485854 6963 162.81 * * * * *x * ** -CKS 106720 03/30/90 9.35 THE PRINT SHOP COPIER SERVICE 10- 4504 - 510 -51 13154 106T20 03/30/90 119.69 THE PRINT SHOP COPIER SERVICE 10- 4504- 510 -51 13151 106T20 04/03/90 527.50 THE PRINT SHOP MONTHLY NEWSLETTER 10- 4504 - 628 -62 13097 6541 656.54 * * * *x* * ** -CKS 106T29 04/02/90 9,443.43 THOMSEN- NYBECK PROSECUTION 10- 4201 - 220 -22 106T29 04/02/90 9,443.43- THOMSEN - NYBECK PROSECUTION 10- 4201 - 220 -22 106T29 04/02/90 9,443.43 THOMSEN - NYBECK PROSECUTION 10- 4201 - 220 -22 9,443.43 * 106T30 04/05/90 9,199.90 THORPE DISTR. BEER 50- 4630 - 862 -86 9,199.90 * * * *xx* * ** -CKS 106T40 04/09/90 60.40 TOLL COMPANY PROPANE 10- 4610 - 560 -56 109125 6874 106T40 04/09/90 42.79 TOLL COMPANY WELDING SUPPLIES 10- 4610 - 560 -56 36151 6708 106T40 04/02/90 6.62 TOLL COMPANY PROPANE -10- 4610- 560 -56 35957 5012 106T40 04/02/90 24.75 TOLL COMPANY PROPANE 40- 4504 - 801 -80 35731 6435 134.56 * * ** -CKS 106T53 04/02/90 4,120.07 TRACY OIL GASOLINE 10- 4612- 560 -56 T17580 6722 4,120.07 * * * *x ** * ** -CKS 2 82.4--68.2 -6 6_._ . _.. -------- -5958-,--, --PIZZA 106T60 04/06/90 116.76- TONYS PIZZA SERV PIZZA 27- 4624 - 663 -66 5958 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 116.76* 2 --58 * RxxRxR CITY GAR. DOOR 106T88 04/05/90 18.12 GAR. DOOR REPAIR PARTS 18.12 CITY RRRRxx DOOR DOOR REPAIR TWIN 106T96 04/10/90 429.00 INSTALL HINGES 106T96 04/10/90 55.10 DOOR 106T96 04/05/90 725.98 _758.69 - 106T96 04/03/90 233.90 106T96 04/03/90 190.50 RxRxxx 1,634.48* 106U08 04/10/90 4,613.37 106U08 04/10/90 142.90 RRxxRx 4,756.27 106U14 04/10/90 459.55 106U14 04/10/90 72.85 106U14 04/10/90 26.10 106U14 04/10/90 16.31 106U14 04/10/90 192.85 767.66 R R R R R R 106U30 04/02/90 21.00 xRRxxR 21.00 106V10 04/10/90 396.97 xxRxxx 396.97 106V43 04/10/90 169.76 106V43 04/10/90 363.21 106V43 04/10/90 41.60 574.57 xxxRxx 106V48 04/05/90 37.65 37.65 R R R R x R 106V80 04/10/90 7.44 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION TWIN CITY HOME JUICE JUICE TWIN CITY GAR. DOOR CONTRACTED REPAIRS TWIN CITY GAR. DOOR REPAIR PARTS TWIN CITY GAR. DOOR DOOR REPAIR TWIN CITY GAR. DOOR INSTALL HINGES TWIN CITY GAR. DOOR INSTALL HINGES UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOWANCE UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOWANCE UNITED ELECTRIC CORP ELECTRIC PARTS UNITED ELECTRIC CORP CONNECTORS UNITED ELECTRIC CORP TIMER UNITED ELECTRIC CORP EMT UNITED ELECTRIC CORP ELECTRIC PARTS US WEST PAGING PAGER VALLEY INDUSTRIAL LP FUEL VERSATILE VEHICLE CART PARTS VERSATILE VEHICLE CART PARTS VERSATILE VEHICLE CART PARTS VOTER REG /ELEC SECT POSTAGE VOSS ELECTRIC.SUP LAMPS 04 -16 -90 PAGE 30 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 50- 4632 - 862 -86 10- 4248 - 440 -44 4228 5811 10- 4540 - 440 -44 4228 5811 10- 4540- 540 -54 3847 6137 10- 4540 - 540 -54 1880 6644 10- 4540- 540 -54 1879 6645 10- 4266 - 420 -42 10- 4266 - 430 -42 10- 4504 - 322 -30 6170 10- 4504 - 330 -30 5293 10- 4540 - 390 -30 6653 10- 4540 - 520 -52 6663 10- 4540 - 540 -54 6329 10- 4201 - 640 -64 6815 28 -4612- 704 -70. 27- 4540 - 665-66 6258 6744 27 -4540- 665 -66 6230 6673 27- 4540- 665 -66 6262 6759 10- 4290 - 140 -14 10- 4540 - 330 -30 265939 6695 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS RRR -CKS Aft 1990 CITY OF EDINA LAMPS VOSS CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT ELECTRIC SUP 106V80 04/10/90 199.67 EMERGENCY LITE 106V80 04/10/90 45.72 W.W. 106V80 04/1,0/90 257.28 GRAINGER BRACKET 510.11 kkxxxx 106W08 04/10/90 262.64 106W08 04/10/90 81.10 106W08 04/10/90 41.66 106W08 04/10/90 41.66 427.06 xkkkkx 106W10 04/09/90 67.32 67.32 kxkxxx 106W13 04/03/90 362.25 106W13 04/03/90 25.00 k k x k x x 387.25 106W15 03/30/90 100.00 100.00 kkk *kk 106W28 04/02/90 138.00 106W28 04/10/90 229.50 106W28 04/02/90 140.40 507.90 kxxxxk 106W44 04/09/90 195.15 106W44 04/09/90 234.69 106W44 04/09/90 243.04 672.88 xrxxxk . 106W52 03/30/90 100.00 100.00 kkxkxx 106W66 04/10/90 174.04 106W66 04/10/90 27.65 201.69 k k x k R x CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION VOSS ELECTRIC SUP LAMPS VOSS ELECTRIC SUP LAMPS VOSS ELECTRIC SUP ELECTRIC PARTS W.W. GRAINGER EMERGENCY LITE W.W. GRAINGER HAND TRUCK W.W. GRAINGER BRACKET W.W. GRAINGER BRACKET WALKER - MERWIN WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP WALTER JOHNSON WATER PRODUCTS WATER PRODUCTS WATER PRODUCTS WEST WELD SUPPLY CO WEST WELD SUPPLY CO WEST WELD SUPPLY CO WM WALSH WILLIAMS STEEL WILLIAMS STEEL MILEAGE TERMINAL BOARD PUMP REPAIR POLICE.SERVICES 04 -16 -90 PAGE 31 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4540 - 520 -52 264586 6195 10- 4540- 646 -64 265008 6347 50- 4540 - 821 -82 265446 6344 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 6568 10- 4540 - 540 -54 6210 10- 4540 - 646 -64 5395 10- 4540 - 646 -64 5396 * ** -CKS 27- 4208 - 661 -66 * ** -CKS 40- 4248 - 801 -80 102328 6842 40- 4248 - 801 -80 102460 6841 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS WATER MAIN REPAIR 40- 4504 - 803 -80 112192 6387 REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 807 -80 117380 6843 PUC PIPE 41- 4550 - 900 -90 114154 6699 * ** -CKS LINER /ELECTRODE 10- 4610- 560 -56 83256 6511 CONDUCTOR /WIRE 10- 4610 - 560 -56 82937 6640 TORCH 10- 4610 - 560 -56 83438 6725 POLICE SERVICES HARD HAT SPRAY HARD HAT SPRAY 10- 4100 - 430 -42 10- 4620 - 560 -56 40- 4504 - 801 -80 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 106W71 03/30/90 568.25 568.25 * 106W76 04/06/90 195.91 195.91 * 106W92 03/30/90 100.00 * * * * ** 100.00 * 106214 04/02/90 130.06 130.06 * * * * * ** 209,843.87 10.70 3,916.27 ^ ,;z8- 2,361.51 1,085.00 40,776.23 9,994.05 7 ^�P5 7,958.69 270.35 - 12,050.18 9,248.74 16,934.45 87593.28 137,,433.80 12,164.20 541,647.27* 541,905.36 r• CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION WINFIELD DEVEL. RENT WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY WROBLESKI -HENRY ZIEGLER INC FUND 10 TOTAL FUND 12 TOTAL FUND 23 TOTAL FUND 25 TOTAL FUND 26 TOTAL FUND 27 TOTAL FUND 28 TOTAL FUND 29 TOTAL FUND 30 TOTAL FUND 40 TOTAL FUND 41 TOTAL FUND 50 TOTAL FUND 60 TOTAL FUND 66 TOTAL TOTAL 04 -16 -90 PAGE 32 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10 -4201- 627 -62 10182 * ** -CKS CLUBS /RANGE 27 -4540- 666 -66 25639 6474 * ** -CKS POLICE SERVICES 10- 4100 - 430 -42 I * ** -CKS SOLENOID 10- 4540 - 560 -56 6493 GENERAL FUND COMMUNICATIONS ART CENTER CAPITAL FUND SWIMMING POOL FUND GOLF COURSE FUND RECREATION CENTER FUND GUN RANGE FUND EDINBOROUGH PARK UTILITY FUND STORM SEWER UTILITY LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND CONSTRUCTION FUND IMP BOND REDEMPTION #2 * ** -CKS