HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-05-07_COUNCIL PACKETf' Y
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA. CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
APRIL 2, 1990
ROL CALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor
Richards.
VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION WEEK PROCLAIMED Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by
Member Smith for adoption of the following proclamation:
PROCLAMATION - VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION WEEK
WHEREAS, volunteers have enriched the life of our community through their concern,
commitment, and generosity of spirit; and
WHEREAS, volunteers are a vital resource to provide for the well -being of our
community and its citizens; and
WHEREAS, volunteerism embodies a spirit of giving and spirit of growth; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edina is proud of the efforts of our volunteers and.wishes to
thank them for their dedicated service;
NOW, THEREFORE I, Frederick S. Richards, Mayor of Edina, Minnesota, do hereby
proclaim the week of April 15 - 21, 1990, as:
VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION WEEK
ADOPTED this 2nd day of April, 1990.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Notion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by
Member Rice to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 5 AND JOINT HRA /COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH
19, 1990 APPROVED Notion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member
Rice to approve the Minutes of the Regular March 5 and Joint HRA /Council Meeting
of March 19, 1990.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED ON THE DESIGNATION OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND APPROVAL
OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS ADOPTED Gordon Hughes, Assistant City Manager,.
advised that notice of this hearing was published.and sent to the School Board, to
the Board of Commissioners of Hennepin County, and also to property owners in the
proposed districts although this is not a requirement. The three areas for
consideration are:
1. 44th Street and France Avenue
2. Valley View Road and Wooddale Avenue
3. 70th Street and Cahill Road
The development program and tax increment financing plans comprise the legal
documents which establish the districts. Plans are required prior to the
establishment of T.I.F. Districts and the plans are conceptual and not final.
Establishment of T.I.F. Districts is the basis for estimating public costs and tax
increment revenues and a framework for deciding the location and the amount of
future public expenditures. Mr. Hughes stated that these plans rely ultimately on
market place decisions. He noted that these development /redevelopment plans do
not constitute rezonings, amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, site plans,
or an authorization to acquire private property. These are not the only plans,
property owners /developers may propose different plans for these districts and
public hearings would have to be held.
Fred Hoisington, of the Hoisington Group, a consulting planner who has prepared
land use -plans for the site was introduced by Assistant Manager Hughes also
introduced was J. Peter Meyers who has assisted the City as liaison with the
business community.
Mr. Hoisington inquired about how much background should be presented to the
audience, with a reminder that a number of people had not seen the proposal.
Mayor Richards told Mr. Hoisington to go through the plans again to familiarize
everyone with what the development plans propose. Mr. Hoisington stated that
consultants like to look at the plans for the three areas in a planners view.
Problems and needs of these areas are as follows by area:
44th Street and France Avenue - The plan presented stressed a concept more
than a physical plan with a change in density of housing on the north side of 44th
Street, yet maintaining the character, ownership and architecture of the area.
The area closest to 44th has a lack of parking while buildings in back have a
surplus of spaces. Steep slopes pose a problem in developing parking in this
area. Rehabilitation of the area was mentioned. Mr. Hoisington described a
redevelopment of the area south of Sunnyside Road which would include a retail
center of 15,000- 20,000 sq.ft, and an office building of 8,000- 10,000 sq. ft.
Wooddale Avenue and Valley View - Streets are 61st, Kellogg, and Oaklawn.
Landmarks are a large multi - family building, day -care center /office building,
shopping center and gas station. Mr. Hoisington pointed out the dangers of the
area; risks for pedestrians, parking and circulation of traffic. Some unsightly
uses exist, while roads do not meet State Aid standards. The conceptual plan,
shows a possible expansion of the shopping center, clinic and drug store, with a
refocusing of that location to the east. The conceptual plan also shows some
restructuring and reorientation but retention of some business to reflect the
Comprehensive Plan which states these types of districts should be contracted to a
degree. A need was noted for Kellogg not to continue through to Valley View but a
separation between retail and residential could be designed by creating a
hammerhead cul -de -sac. Landscaping, with entry features, the widening of Wooddale
from 30' to 32' -36 with turn -lanes would be an attempt to create identity for the
area.
70th Street and Cahill Avenue - Streets in the area are West 70th Street,
Cahill Road and Amundson Avenue. Landmarks are the old Cahill School, a
multi - family housing unit and Cahill Shopping Center. Cahill Center, built in the
'60's, has experienced some leasing difficulties because of the steep grade and
dis- jointed buildings. The conceptual plan is if one building could be built,
retailers could leverage off of each other. One approach for King's Court would
be upgrading and expansion plus,the development of a single center with one
building. The plan could would include possible vacation, addition of a
cul -de -sac on Amundson with the result being the retention of the industrial and
redevelopment of the center. One other idea is to eliminate the central building
and link all buildings together. One main problem with this link would be the 7'
grade between the buildings. Rehabilitation of these buildings is another
possibility via low- interest loans.
Assistant Manager Hughes spoke about the recommended action needed to adopt the
Resolution which approves the development plan and the tax increment financing
plans for each district.
Mayor Richards commented that letters have been received, reproduced and
circulated to all of the Council Members. He opened the Public Hearing and asked
for comments and concerns from the audience. He stated the reason we are again
looking at this is in the belief that the window of opportunity exists to give the
City necessary tools to properly plan these commercial areas. There are no plans
being decided upon-tonight, only the creating of tax increment districts under
consideration, if the Council wishes.
Dr. Philip Sidell, 3920 Sunnyside Road; Mary Jo Aiken, 4548 France Av. S.; Jim Van
Valkenburg, attorney representing the Edina Cleaner's; Dr. Franklin Sidell, 3920
Sunnyside; Ruth Elwell, 4311 Eton Place; Bill Scholmak, Attorney representing Mr.
Gold; Laura Plaetzer, 4058 Sunnyside Road; Walt Sandison, 4612 W. 58th St.; Bob
Roster, owner of Roster's Service & Rentals on Valley View Road & Kellogg; Eric
Kolsom, 3924 44th St. W; Lois Roen - Brickley, 6120 Kellogg spoke in opposition of
the development tax increment financing districts. Steve Soltau, 6100 Oaklawn
Av. spoke in favor of the creation of these districts.
One member of the audience asked if one vote would be taken for all districts or
votes taken individually. Mayor Richards commented that each area would be voted
on individually. The question was asked if both sides of France Avenue would be
involved. Assistant Manager Hughes answered that Minneapolis has been contacted
about their embarking on their own tax increment plan and said he hoped they could
later join efforts. Another question was whether the lines on the proposal could
be expanded or contracted. Assistant Manager Hughes said it is more difficult to
add a parcel to the district rather than delete it.
Audience comments and concerns ranged from concern about property being taken, and
concern over the nearly completed renovation of some properties, loss of business
because of relocation, different levels of parking lots, traffic problems, the
necessity of change, the concern for the maintaining of the unique charm and
architecture, safety, the upgrading of Valley View was a often heard comment,
landscaping would be desirable, and less population would be a plus.
Mayor Richards asked for questions or concerns from the Council or audience.
Member-Kelly asked J. Peter Meyer if he would explain what he has done with this
proposal.
J. Peter Meyers, stated he has spent 6 weeks representing the City as a liaison
between the planner, involved parties and the City. Upon his recommendation, and
with his attendance, one -on -one private meetings were held for those who had
concerns or questions.
Member.Kelly, asked Mr. Meyers what his assessment was of the meetings held. Mr.
Meyers said there had been some lack of understanding, but with property owners
input, questions began to arise and answers were attempted. Some property owners
now represented directly, received answers from neighbors or via rumors and he
felt some of the apprehension is being represented at this meeting. He said his
job was to alleviate some of-that apprehension by the meetings. He feels the City
is not taking advantage of the property owners, but offering a_tool that has been
properly used by Edina in the past, with this being the opportunity to do that.
Member Kelly asked again whether we are trying to reconstruct a blighted area or
that we are meeting a social need for public good. Mr. Meyers said we are looking
to the future, no one knew what the effect of Southdale would be when it was being
developed either. Member Kelly expressed her thanks to Mr. Meyers for his work on
this project.
Member Rice mentioned about previously heard comments regarding 44th and some to
.Valley View & Wooddale. At the last hearing, Mr. Rice said he felt there was less
opposition at 70th & Cahill than at 44th and at Valley & Wooddale, and asked Mr.
Meyers if he felt the same. Mr. Meyers concurred.
Mayor Richards answered the question about the necessity of establishing this tax
increment financing area, stating we need not do anything, and could let matters
resolve themselves which would be an easier course, but he does not believe this
is the right course. The do- nothing course would deprive property owners of an
advantage that others have experienced and continue to experience with tax
increment financing districts. Mayor Richards mentioned the bashing by
legislators of Edina for the mis- handling of tax increment money, and being
compared to Minneapolis. He stated that Edina has not and will not go that route.
We are fiscally responsible in Edina and will remain so. Mayor Richards predicts
some residents will come before the Council at a later date asking for help with
public improvements and public monies and Council is proposing they do them all
themselves. Again, we could do nothing, and miss the opportunity to create a
situation to work with the private sector in trying to improve these areas. In
answer to comments, about putting in a lot of money with no pay -back, Mayor
Richards explained the City would not spend money unless we can be assured it can
be captured in the tax increment financing district. In explanation to another
comment heard regarding the ability to use these vehicles for financing of public
improvements but not to give a subsidy to the private sector. Mayor Richards said
if money is available it could pay for the public improvements, if not, those,
public improvements are not done. The statement that we are engaged in deficit
spending is not.accurate. Another comment heard about taking residential /private
properties, philosophically, he would not support any private property being
taken. He offered his support in the creation of these districts which would
enable the private sector and remaining viable areas able to compete with other
areas throughout the metropolitan area.
Member Rice questioned a troubling comment that was heard regarding whether the
free market process is inhibited if these districts are adopted.
Assistant Manager Hughes answered that by adopting the plan, some properties or
certain buyers could become undesirable or might chill a sale. On the other side,
the presence of a property in a district tends to attract buyers rather than chill
the buyers. Member Rice asked in which district was this the case. Mr. Hughes
stated that at 50th & France, three homes south of the Peoples Plus station are
included in the plan and were shown for multi - family housing, that housing has
never occurred, yet sales on those houses have been brisk. Member Rice questioned
about another comment regarding the expansion of a business and if this
establishment of this district would be a detriment to this. Manager Hughes
answered no, the plan shows an opportunity for expansion, and would add some
credence of expanding the business rather than opposing a negative on it. This
could vary property by property, retail opportunities could be enhanced rather
than be reduced.
Member Smith took exception to the comment that this establishment of a tax
increment district idea was dreamed up in response to folks in St. Paul. He
explained this issue was discussed last spring and may have forced us to adopt a
schedule, and identify things that we could maintain such as viable retail areas.
The intent was not to control what could be or could not be done with buildings in
the area. Looking at the plans, we are shown the planner's view. Maintaining the
vitality of the buildings and homes is the City's job. He stated he sees little
wrong at 44th but would like to facilitate some fix -up of the area. One way this
can be assured is to capture increments of tax between a certain date and a future
date. This would not be developed by the City, nor would homes be purchased, this
would be done by a developer with an interest in your property. Correspondence
has been received regarding the Valley View area. Some property owners in that
area have ideas of what they would like to see done. Member Smith commented that
he does not want things to be razed, but is interested in options we have to
invest in improving the area. In the 70th & Cahill area, we have seen a planners
view. The owner of the property has begun doing some improvements, without asking
for public money. He said his hope would be that the City would have the money
for the property owner when he would be ready to improve the area, street wise,
etc. The charm of these areas must be maintained, but somehow the City needs to
be ready when the area needs the help. In answer to an audience question about
trust of the Council to maintain the same posture. Member Smith stated it depends
on the Council that you elect having your same views. He encouraged the audience
to attend,Council meetings, write letters to the Council with their views, and to
attend planning commission meetings when these issues are being decided upon.
Member Jane Paulus stated the job of the City Council is to represent the whole
City in long range planning, not only for today but for years in the future. Her
perception of what she has heard tonight is mainly a 'me' point of view and is
difficult to address one -on -one. Residential areas in Edina that seem to be
appreciating the greatest in home value are those that have a neighborhood
identity. People moving into these areas want a small area they can walk to, and
seem to be bringing prime dollars back today into these areas. Member Paulus said
these three areas hit these points very well.
Member Peggy Kelly asked what were the four options. She said she has a difficult
time with tax increment financing, she believes the private sector should be the
risk -taker in a market - driven economy yet she had a concern a few years ago about
the 44th & France area when Minneapolis was doing improvements on their side of
the. Member Kelly commented that she is pleased with improvements she sees
happening. She still hears comments about the beautiful way the 50th & France
project turned out. During the time of the improvements with 50th & France the
economic climate was different and she does not feel 44th & France has the same
characteristics. The 70th &_ Wooddale area has two problems, the gas station and
traffic. The Cahill development has been before the Council before, and said she
is looking for some public assistance there to make it happen. Member Kelly said
this is a hard decision but feels she must vote against the proposal.
Member Rice asked if there was a timeline on these projects. Manager Hughes
commented that the duration of the Wooddale & Valley View district and the 70th &
Cahill district would be a maximum of 10 years from the day of its establishment
or at most 8 years of increments. 44th & France could last a maximum of 25 years.
Member Rice questioned if the vote taken tonight would be to establish these
districts. Manager Hughes stated yes. Member Rice asked if at any time in the
next few years more planning could be initiated with no effective date. Member
Hughes commented that there is a four -year, knock -out provision, which means if a
parcel is not benefitted by a public project or through tax increment financing
within four years of establishment, that parcel drops out of the district. If
later, for instance in the fifth year, it could then come.in to the district but
just for three more years, until the conclusion of the district.
Member Rice said that he agrees with many comments heard, but does not agree with
the taking of property. He believes the planner working with the City has
responded well but think the plans are too aggressive. He said if he were drawing
the lines or putting in uses, he would do them differently.
He commented he has heard conflicting comments such as, save my business, even
though it is unsightly, and don't touch this facility, it generates 2,000 cars per
week, and then don't do anything that will increase traffic. He stated he is in
favor of the establishment of these districts, as it gives the City an option.
There are no mandates to do anything at any time, but the opportunity and option
to work with the single family and property owners in these areas. One
interesting comment was made that this would be a catalyst to spur more
examination of these areas and establishing cooperation between private and public
sector. Some visions for the futures of these areas must be seen. Member Rice
stated he would vote in favor of these proposals.
Member Smith inquired about when the 50th & France development was done, how were
the people and property owners within that tax increment district involved. Mayor
Richards stated that in 1970 -72, one of the strongest groups was the 50th & France
Business Association which still meets on a regular basis. The Vernon Avenue area
has a group that meets on a regular basis with continuous involvement also.
Assistant Manager Hughes commented that a steering committee was and still is
working as an interface with the City. The committee is typically made up of
tenants and landlords and is currently meeting with him on a monthly basis on a
prospective project this year. Member Smith questioned the type of input he was
hearing from the 50th & France Association, and what impact they have had.
Manager Hughes stated they had participated very closely in the initial project
and with the present project are guiding our architect more than staff in terms of
the urban design elements that are being pursued.
Member Kelly asked if members of the 50th & France Business Owners Association is
comprised of members of the Minneapolis side too. Manager Hughes said yes the
Association does have Minneapolis members and that the Edina side is in a tax
increment district while the Minneapolis side is not. The improvements for the
Minneapolis side were financed through special assessment as opposed to tax
increment financing. Member Kelly asked that perhaps the association does more
than work with tax increment issues. Manager Hughes commented yes.
Member Rice inquired if property owners would feel like they were in a quandry if
these districts were established, and would an orderly timetable be developed.
Manager Hughes stated that it varies from district to district. The 44th & France
district is similar to 50th & France and recommendation would be to encourage that
area to adopt and establish an association that can be worked with - to bounce
ideas off of and be a sounding board. Member Rice asked if this timetable was
meant to be months or years. Manager Hughes commented months would be needed to
get something like that started. 70th & Cahill is a much less cohesive area and
one property owner is instrumental with what will happen in that district. Valley
View & Wooddale is more in the middle, with two key owners in this district. An
association would also be beneficial in this area. Manager Hughes stated that
after creating the districts, it would be the decision of the Council how
aggressive or reactive they would like to be in promoting the districts.
Mayor Richards commented the issue of aggressive or reactive promoting of the area
bears discussing. The City has not been proactive in trying to promote types of
improvements. The initiative has come from the private sector with building
expansion, etc. He referred to the four previous tax increment districts that
have been instituted, that the initiative had been taken by the City. This could
be done, but would fly in the face of the City, in that if the private sector does
not want to do it, then the City shouldn't propose it. The City is not creating
projects, and if a deadline is put on it, it might create an artificial
stimulation that may or may not be warranted by the area that is under discussion.
Member Rice inquired whether it would be the City's policy to encourage these
areas to be in constant communication with City staff, that these plans and uses
are not in concrete, but are here to help. Mayor Richards concurred that we are
here to discuss any proposals that the private sector may come up with.
Member Kelly asked in establishing these districts, if the City must have a plan
in order to approve a district, how much flexibility can we have with the plan.
Attorney Gilligan explained that under the statute there is no need for detailed
plans or land uses that are set forth in the development program. Goals and
objectives need to be stated about the City's intentions, but no details need to
be done.
Member Smith asked if it is typical in a plan to go into the detail that has been
done for these proposed districts. Attorney Gilligan stated that many of these
plans come about because there is a development that will occur, so it is known,
as opposed to not knowing what is going to happen. The proposals for the
districts allow for much more flexibility and are proposed plans, but do not
commit the City to the specific land use. Member Smith said in his understanding
of the plan, we do not have "little boxes" of future development. In the plan a
line has been drawn around a neighborhood or an area and that identifies the
district. The plan does not spell out this or that happening, but is background
information staff has used to determine what the size the district should be.
Mayor Richards asked the pleasure of the Council.
Council Member Rice made a motion for the adoption of the following resolution as
it relates to the establishment of a tax increment district for the 44th Street
and France Avenue area:
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT
PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 2
AND TAB INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS FOR
TAB INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS 90 -1, 90 -2
AND 90 -3 MAKING FINDINGS AND REQUESTING
CERTIFICATION OF THE TAB INCREMENT FINANCING
DISTRICTS 90 -1, 90 -2, AND 90 -3.
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as
follows:
1. On April 2, 1990, this Council held a public hearing on the designation of
Development District No. 2 (the "Development District ") and the adoption of the
Development Program for Development District No.2 (the "Program ") and on the
adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax Increment Financing
Districts 90 -1, 90 -2, and 90 -3 (the "Tax Increment Districts "), after notice of
public hearing was published in the official newspaper of the City not less than
10 days prior to the date of the hearing. The City has consulted with its
planning department on the designation of the Development District. All persons
desiring to be heard at the,hearing were given an opportunity to express their
views.
2. Copies of the Program and the Tax Increment Financing Plans have been
presented to this Council and are ordered placed on file with the City Clerk. The
forms of the Program and Tax Increment Financing Plans are hereby approved and are
incorporated herein by reference.
3. The Program and Tax Increment Financing Plans and the designation of the
Development District and establishment of the Tax Increment Financing Districts
are hereby approved.
4. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision 3, it.is
hereby found for the reasons set forth in the Program and Tax Increment Financing
Plans that:
A. Tax Increment Financing Districts 90 -2 and 90 -3 are each in "economic
development district" as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174,
subdivision 12.
B. Tax Increment Financing District 90 -1 is a "redevelopment district" as
defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 10.
C. The proposed development outlined in the Program in the opinion of this
Council would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably
foreseeable future and therefor the use of tax increment financing is deemed
necessary,
D. The Tax Increment Financing Plans conform to the general plan for the
development of the City as a whole in that it aids in the development of the
property in the Development District in a manner that alleviates deficiencies in
the Development District as set forth in the Program.
E. The Tax Increment Financing Plans will afford maximum opportunity
consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole for the development of the
area included in the Development District by private enterprise in that it
alleviates deficiencies in the Development District as set forth in the Program.
F. The City elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, subdivision 3, clause (a).
5. The City Manager is authorized and directed to request that the
appropriate officials of Hennepin County to establish the Tax Increment Districts
for the premises in the City described in the Tax Increment Financing Plans.
Passed by the Council this 2nd day of April, 1990.
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
The motion was seconded by Council Member Paulus, and upon vote being taken
thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Nays: Kelly
Motion carried.
Council Member Smith made a motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution as
it relates to the establishment of a tax increment district for the Yooddale
Avenue and Valley View Road area. The motion was seconded by Council Member
Rice, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Nays: Kelly
Motion carried.
Council Member Smith made a motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution as
it relates to establishment of a tax increment district for the 70th Street and
Cahill Road area. The motion was seconded by Council Member Rice, and upon vote
being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 7101 -13 AMUNDSON AVENUE CONTINUED TO 4116/90 Motion
vas made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Rice to continue the final
development plan for 71101 -13 Amundson Avenue, George Kosmides, generally located
at southeast corner of Cahill Rd and Amundson Av until April 16, 1990.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS DENIED - SOUTH HARRIET PARK STEINER
ADDITION Planner Craig Larsen gave background of the Harriet Park Steiner
Addition. In March 1986 Council approved a final plat at the intersection of 52nd
Street and Minnehaha Boulevard. That plat created two new lots by'breaking off
the rear portion of two lots that were fronting on Minnehaha Blvd. A condition of
that approval was the imposition of private restrictive covenants that would be
imposed prior to the release of building permits on the two lots. Those covenants
were never signed or recorded, consequently staff has refused to issue building
permits for the two lots. Council /Staff received a letter from Mr. Gislason, one
of the two parties of the original plat and he requests the Council remove
restrictions as a condition of the building permits. The restrictions are
structured as a private covenant, seven nearby property owners were given the
standing to enforce the provisions of the covenants. The neighbors were notified
of the request and the hearing before the Council. Specifically within the
Covenants, Section 1, paragraphs A -H set forth design criteria for the houses to
be built upon the lots and the intent at the time of those provisions was to
insure that the design materials and the scale of the new homes would be similar
to those existing in the neighborhood.
Mr. Robert Gislason, 5205 Minnehaha Blvd., lawyer and 40 year Edina resident,
submitted a letter to Council asking that the Special Building Restrictions be
removed. He stated that when he was asked to join in making the subdivision, by
his neighbors, the only difficulty with this was the lot length with it only being
119' where the code calls for 120'. Lots in the area are generally 60' wide, with
the proposed lots being 76' and 78' wide, 25% sq.ft. greater than what is
required. This is choice,land and should be subdivided and put on the tax roles.
Dr. Steiner did appear in 1986 before the Council as he wanted to sell his house
and move to Montana. When Dr. Steiner approached Mr. Gislason, with a long list
of covenants and restrictions, he did not agree with the covenants and would not
sign them. Mr. Gislason believes the covenants to be onerous, and for all
practical purposes these lots seem unmarketable with these covenants in place.
The nine covenants in question are:
A. No more than one family dwelling on each lot
B. Houses shall face and front on West 52nd St.
C. Houses shall have a 40' rear setback and no house shall be within 40' of
the rear boundary of the lot
D. Houses shall not exceed 1 1/2 story in height and shall be not more than
25' at the highest point
E. Roof pitch shall be 6/12 or greater
F. Garages shall be attached, with two stalls; garage floor shall be not
more than 2' above the center line of W. 52nd. St. and follow Edina
Ordinances
G. Materials for exterior shall be brick, shakes, lap siding or a
combination of such. The width of exposed shakes and lap siding shall
not exceed 12"
H. North faces of houses shall be less than 100% glass such that the front
walls of the houses shall not be all glass
Mr. Gislason passed out copies of two Supreme Court Landmark Cases, June 1, 1962,
No 38,420, T. Joseph Olsen v. City of Minneapolis and May 1, 1959, No. 37,609,
State Ex. Re;. Melville Foster and Another v. City of Minneapolis and Another.
The Foster case dealt with a municipal corporation that may not condition
restricted uses of property upon the consent of private individuals such as the
owners of adjoining property. In that case, 2/3 of the adjacent property owners
tried to stop something. The Olson case dealt with the building of a
filling- station at 58th & Penn. The Court said it seemed obvious that the City's
underlying motive in denying plaintiff the permit, was its conclusion that the
operation of the filling station would violate the neighborhood concept which it
sought to insure. These are choice lots in a nice neighborhood. Mr. Gislason
stated he has not tried to market this land, but has been approached by people who
had gotten his name from City.Hall. He stated he feels these lots should be put
in the tax roles the same as all the adjoining land, and feels that the
restrictions are unfair and unlawful.
Member Paulus asked when these covenants were established in 1986, was the legal
opinion that they could stand. Attorney Erickson referred to the minutes attached
of February 3, 1986, these lots were sub - standard, because they were not deep
enough and needed a variance. Within the variance process, the neighbors were
advised of a problem. A meeting was held February 3, 1986, with the neighbors,
City staff and Mr. Steiner. At that point it came before Council as an agreed
upon instance where the parties said fine, these conditions are acceptable, accept
and approve the plat with these conditions imposed. At that time no research or
opinions were given and no dispute was heard. The initial plat approval was
subject to the obtaining of the recorded conditions, and appears by the time of
the final plat approval, these had not been signed and plat was approved subject
to them not issuing building permits. The same consent was there, it was just
deferred, the way the minutes read. There were no opinions given at that time on
the validity of the restrictions. Mr. Erickson stated he is familiar with the
restrictions cited, restrictive uses may not be conditioned on the consent of
adjoining property owners. He referred to the Olson case Mr. Gislason spoke about
and agreed that you can not deny a requested activity within the ordinance that is
solely based upon the objections of neighbors. This case was not based on
neighborhood approval nor based on ascetics, it was a consent arrangement that
came before the Council. Member Paulus asked if her understanding is that this
arrangement as originally drawn up, could stand in a court of law. Mr. Erickson
said there may well be some problems with the restrictions as framed. The legal
issue did not come from the Council, there was no dispute at the time. He
believes what happened was that the Council imposed these restrictions, based upon
a statement that everything was fine. Whether the Council would have acted and
approved the plat, had there been a dispute was another point. The plat was
approved based upon statement that these conditions would be imposed. Member
Paulus questioned whether the plat would become null and void if these conditions
were not met. Mr. Erickson stated this would be an argument if these conditions
were withdrawn, and the approval was given on the presumption that these
conditions were going to be there, therefore the plat should not have been
approved and it may be revoked. Member Paulus asked whether the City Ordinance
presently states that no future single family homes in Edina can be built with
only a single car garage and couldn't be grandfathered in for a one garage.
Planner Larsen stated there must be a two -car garage. Member Paulus inquired if a
person building- a-home meets all ordinances, would these plans be reviewed by the
Planning Department. Planner Larsen stated that the restrictions that are before
the Council are a private matter and the City is not party to those. If there was
a disagreement, the seven parties would have to enforce the covenants. Member
Paulus asked if at the time this was discussed back in 1986, were all parties part
of the discussion at that time. Planner Larsen said 2 parties proposed the plat
and all dealings were with Dr. Steiner with no staff contact with the Gislason's.
The City was led to believe that there was an agreement on the proposal. Member
Paulus asked whether Mr. Gislason was aware of or present at discussions going on
about this. Mr. Gislason stated he was not present, and had no information that
discussions were taking place. His first knowledge of a problem was when he was
asked to sign a document concerning these restrictions and he refused to do so.
Member Paulus-inquired about when this happened. He said 2 -3 years ago. Member
Paulus asked if he had spoken to Mr. Larsen at that time and asked if he had had a
problem with the original agreement that was drafted. Mr. Gislason stated he
explained his position to Dr. Steiner and left it up to him and said again.that he
would not sign it. This has come up now because there is a purchaser that is
interested in one of the lots.
Mancel Mitchell, 5137 Juanita, spoke for himself and a neighbor Maria Beal, 5136
Indianola; Rita Lehnert, speaking for her mother, Mary, 5209 Minnehaha Boulevard;
Carolyn Wenger, 5212 Halifax; spoke in opposition to the lifting of the
restrictive covenants.
Doug Grabham, 5201 Minnehaha offered an apology for bringing up the matter to
begin with. He had a vested interest as he pays the taxes on the empty lots.
Comments heard from the aforementioned residents ranged from the belief being that
anyone interested in building in the area would keep to the spirit and flavor of
the neighborhood and could easily build within these covenants, residents were in
the belief that the City was a party to the process of the drawing up of the
covenants, if the Council chooses to lift these covenants the suggestion was heard
that the whole plat process should be reexamined,
Mayor Richards asked for concerns or questions from the Council.
Member Paulus commented that if these covenant's are removed, it should go back
for variance review. The intent was that the subdivision was granted with the
covenant's riding with it. She asked for clarification from the the planning
department regarding her interpretation of this so that the proponents are aware
that it will go back through the process.
Member Jack Rice asked for clarification on-the process. Could anyone buy these
lots, come in and build on them without a plat being filed. Attorney Erickson
said he has not read the statute lately but believes that a court order would have
to be acquired to cancel the plat that has already been filed.
Member Peggy Kelly asked what it would take to get a court order and would be very
expensive. Attorney Erickson stated it all depends upon how hard Mr. Gislason
fights, it could be expensive but depends upon how difficult a task it is on the
defense side. There would have to be some arguments on misrepresentation that led
the City to do what they did and after these were proven to be such, the
opportunity should be revoked. Member Kelly said in her understanding that if
these covenant's are lifted, this is the process that would have to be done.
Attorney Erickson said no, it is a choice.
Member Rice said if these covenants are rescinded, then we are dependent upon
someone else doing something to get control back over the process. Mayor Richards
recalled the action was an approval of a certain action predicated upon certain
events occurring. If one action is removed, the burden is upon the Council. The
staff was instructed not to issue a building permit until those covenant's were
filed. If the covenant's are removed, the position seems that the staff is free
to issue the building permit. If we do not agree with that point of view then the
action we have taken stands. If Council agrees the action taken stands.
Member Jane Paulus commented that if you want to see how ridiculous the covenants
are, speak to the people who live in the Country Club area. Someone can purchase
a lot, say these are the plans that they are going to build on the lot, but are
not legally tied in to those plans, once the lot is purchased. There is no
safeguard because Planner Larsen has seen the plans to say to the neighborhood
they have a guarantee that the house will fit in when it goes up.
Member Kelly inquired about her understanding that these covenant's were between
the people involved and the process.
Mayor Richards commented that we had a difference of opinion regarding whether a
variance should be granted. Before we got down to the merits of granting or not
granting a variance, a consensus was presented to the Council by the then affected
property owners, putting these 8 restrictions on the property. There was no
objection to the property being platted or replatted.
Member Rice asked if on that basis the Council assumed this was the case. Mayor
Richards said he does not know how he would have thought on the variance, but knew
when everyone was in agreement, and differs some with Mr. Gislason's viewpoint.
Mayor Richards does not consider this onerous enough to diminish the market value
of the property. Character'and symmetry of the neighborhood is always examined to
see if development is consistent with regulations. Mayor Richards said the way he
sees this situation is to assure that what is being proposed, is what the end
result would be. He stated that is the way he voted in 1986, and plans to vote as
such this evening.
Member Paulus asked Mayor Richards if he had any problem with legal issues on this
issue standing. Mayor Richards said he does not use the word legally, but knows
where he stands in voting with what is right or wrong. Member Paulus again said
that she has no problem with this, but hears that if it stands, feels that the
City will be legally challenged. Mayor Richards stated he would not change his
mind because of a possible suit against the City.
Member Rice thinks he is hearing that everyone wants to maintain character and
symmetry, maintain the neighborhood, etc., if this stands and someone who wishes
to build on this property, and must follow the covenants, is the City in a
position to allow this to happen or not. Attorney Erickson said no. At the time
it was set -up, it was established that surrounding neighbors were the enforcing
entities. If they comply with their building code, they are entitled to a
building permit, but if they don't comply with these, the neighbors could say they
did not comply with them and must. Member Rice stated that it would be up to the
neighbors to take the action to stop or go ahead with building.
Mayor Richards stated there are ""a number of choices but the three that surface
are:
1. Affirm the action taken by a previous Council saying that no building
permit should be issued until these restrictions are placed at record. Which in
effect carries forward those conditions seen as set forth.
2. Accept the current proponents request to remove and release those
restrictions altogether. If that is the decision of the Council, then suggest
that'the related issue be addressed whether or not the City should take action to
unwind the approval of the replat and the filing of that replat to go back and
address the fact of variance being necessary to develop the lots that have been
created out of the replat. Or take the action that this does not need to be done,
the replat would be filed. In effect the City's staff should issue a building
permit upon compliance with all building requirements for detached single family
residence rezoning.
3. Do not deal with it, refer it back to the Planning Commission or for
continuance if additional information is needed.
Member Smith stated that the proponent could go back and negotiate with the
property owners that are affected by this agreement that goes with the land by
virtue of the platting, and try to get modifications that are deemed necessary and
bring that revision back to Council and then go forth and enforce their
restriction. If he neighbors wanted to modify this plan they may. Mr. Smith
stated he is thinks things should be as they are, and that Mr. Gislason should try
to work with the neighbors, if they at that time want to revise it they may. Mr.
Smith said he would vote to let it stand.
Member Smith made a motion to deny the request to remove the restrictive covenants
from the South Harriet Park Steiner Addition and a second to the motion was given
by Member Paulus.
Member Rice stated he would support the motion, however if Mr. Gislason came back
in the future and said he was able to negotiate all but one item on the list, and
no one is responsive to that, he might have a different attitude about it.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
Mayor Richards commented that the action taken in March, 1986 stands.
* LOT DIVISIONS APPROVED AT 7021 VMORD RD AND 7028 AND 7100 DOWN ROAD AND LOT
DIVISIONS AT 6124 AND 6128 EWING AV SO APPROVED Motion was made by Member Smith
and was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute various separate
parcels:
Lot 12, PROSPECT HILLS, and
Lot 2, Block 1, GRIFFITH ADDITION, and
Lot 1, Block 1, SCHEY'S PARR VIEW 2ND ADDITION
WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to subdivide said tracts
into the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "Parcels "):
Lot 12, PROSPECT HILLS, except that part of Lot 12, PROSPECT HILLS lying
southeasterly of a line running from a point in the easterly line of Wexford
Road distant 67.26 feet southerly measured along said easterly line, from the
southwesterly corner of Lot 13 said PROSPECT HILLS, to a point in the
northeasterly line of said Lot 13, distant 50.00 feet northwesterly, measured
along said northeasterly line, from the southeasterly corner of said Lot 13
and lying westerly of a line drawn from a point on the above described line
distant 97.08 feet northeasterly along said line from the easterly line of
Wexford Road to a point on the south line of said Lot 12 distant 139.81 feet
easterly along said south line from the most westerly corner of said Lot 12.
Subject to easements of record, if any; and
Lot 2, Block 1, GRIFFITH ADDITION, and that part of Lot 12, PROSPECT HILLS
lying southeasterly of a line running from a point in the easterly line of
Wexford Road distant 67.26 feet southerly measured along said easterly line,
from the southwesterly corner of Lot 13 said PROSPECT HILLS, to a point in
the northeasterly line of said Lot 13, distant 50.00 feet northwesterly,
measured along said northeasterly line, from the southeasterly corner of said
Lot 13 and lying westerly of a line drawn from a point on the above described
line distant 97.08_feet northeasterly along said line from the easterly line
of Wexford Road to a point on the south line of said Lot 12 distant 139.81
feet easterly along said south line from the most westerly corner of said Lot
12. Except the east 54.03 feet as measured at right angles to the east line
thereof. Subject to easements of record, if any; and
Lot 1, Block 1, SCHEY'S PARR VIEW 2ND ADDITION, and the east 54.03 feet, as
measured at right angles to the east line, of the following described
property: That part of Lot 12, PROSPECT HILLS lying southeasterly of a line
running from a point in the easterly line of Wexford Road distant 67.26 feet
southerly, measured along said easterly line, from the southwesterly corner
of Lot 13 said PROSPECT HILLS, to a point in the northeasterly line of said
Lot 13, distant 50.00 feet northwesterly, measured along said northeasterly
line, from the southeasterly corner of said Lot 13 and lying westerly of a
line drawn from a point on the above described line distant 97.08 feet
northeasterly along said line from the easterly line of Wexford Road to a
point on the south line of said Lot 12 distant 139.81 feet easterly along
said south line from the most westerly corner of said Lot 12. Subject to
easements of record, if any.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said
Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the
Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinances
Nos. 804 and 825;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is
hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 804 and
Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof-
as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any
other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further
subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent
ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may
be provided for by those ordinances.
ADOPTED this 2nd day of April, 1990.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute various separate
parcels:
Lot 3, Block 1, ENGL.EHARDT'S ADDITION, and
Lot 1, Block 1, FARMER'S SECOND ADDITION
WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to subdivide said tracts
into the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "Parcels "):
Lot 3, Block 1, ENGLEHARDT'S ADDITION, except the south 5 feet, and
Lot 1, Block 1, FARMER'S SECOND ADDITION, and the south 5 feet of Lot 3,
Block 1, ENGLEHARDT'S ADDITION; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said
Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the
Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the.City of Edina Ordinances
Nos. 804 and '825 ;
NOV,_THER_EFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is
hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 804 and
Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof
as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any
other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further
subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent
ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may
be provided for by those ordinances.
ADOPTED this 2nd day of April, 1990.
DECISION OF BOARD OF APPEALS OVERTURNED: SIDEYARD SETBACK VARIANCE GRANTED - 4420
VANDERVORK AV Associate Planner Phil Dommer gave background on the appeal of the
decision by the Edina Board of Appeals to deny a 1.5 foot sideyard setback
variance in case B -90 -9. The Board met March 15, 1990, to review the subject
variance. At issue is a sideyard setback which is a typical situation which we
have in the City, where as the building gets taller, the sideyard setback
requirement is increased by 1 1/2' on both sides of the house. The Board of
Appeals heard this request, reviewed testimony from the proponent and decided to
deny the request. The proponent is here tonight with her designer if there are
any questions: Mayor Richards called for questions from the audience. Mayor
Richards asked the proponent to speak.
Star Marie Anderson- Atwater, a 10 year resident at 4420 Vandervork Av., stated
that in March, Mr. Dommer told her that a home in her neighborhood had a variance
when it was built and her home will resemble this home when her addition is
completed. Ms. Anderson - Atwater added there are 7 houses on her block, 4
two -story and 3 one - story. She said her neighbors have no objection to the plans,
after examining them. One neighbor adjoining has one window on the side facing
the Anderson - Atwater home and the neighbor on the other side has only one win
being a bathroom window. She said she has two children and needs room and it
would be more expensive to put the addition in 1 1/2' ft.
Mayor Richards opened up the meeting for comments on why this variance should not
be granted.
Member Kelly asked if any neighbors were in the audience that would speak to this
issue. She noted she has driven around the area a lot today and commented that
this is a unique area in that the back yard is a wetland, across the street is a
park and it is east west facing so no blocking light out with 2 story houses next
to the one story houses. She said she wished she could hear the neighbors state
they have no objection to this addition, but after her examining of the area she
stated she could allow this variance to be granted.
Member Paulus asked of Mr. Dommer whether we got any comments at the time the
original variance was heard. Associate Planner Dommer commented that there were
no comments heard, either at the hearing or by letter.
Member Smith asked Mr. Dommer if these neighbors have ever signed off. Mr. Dommer
said no, that it is not required that neighbors sign, their opportunity to make
their feelings heard is at the hearing, and they received a notice about that.
Member Smith inquired if there is a way of indicating agreement with the
proponents statement that the neighbors do not object. Mr. Dommer stated he did
not know this for sure.
Ms. Anderson - Atwater commented that one neighbor's son who does painting and
wallpapering and wants to do the work. Member Smith wanted more evidence that the
neighbors were all right with this addition. Mayor Richards stated that all the
City can do is send notices and give people the opportunity to participate.
Member Smith stated the Council does not know what the residents think and
expressed concern.
Mayor Richards called for the pleasure of the Council.
Member Kelly made the motion to allow the variance to be granted and the decision
of the Board of Appeals for the sideyard setback at 4420 Vandervork Av be
overturned and a second to the motion was made by Member Smith. Member Paulus
wished the minutes to read that no neighbors were present at the variance meeting
and at the public hearing April 2, 1990, nor was there any public comment noted.
Member Kelly said if that was to be included that it should be noted that at the
Board.of Appeals meeting the vote was a 2 to 2 vote which failed because -the lack
of majority.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*HEARING DATE OF 4116190 SET FOR PLANNING MATTERS Motion was made by Member Smith
and was seconded by Member Rice to.set April 16, 1990, as hearing date for the
following Planning matters:
1) Final Rezoning - R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -2, Ron Clark
Construction
2) Final Plat Approval - Highcroft Addition, Ron Clark Construction
3) Preliminary Rezoning Approval - PCD -4 Planned Commercial District to PCD -2
Planned Commercial District - Valgreen's by Semper Holdings 4916 France Avenue
South
4) Preliminary Plat Approval of R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District to PRD -2,
Planned Residential District - Schaefer Development
5) Final Development Plan - Opus Corporation - Western Rational Mutual Insurance -
5350 V. 78th St., 5309 Industrial Boulevard - Building Expansion
6) Final Development Plan for 6969 France Av. S. - Gabbert and Beck Building
Expansion
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE RELATING TO OP -SALE VINE LICENSE AMENDMENT GRANTED
City Manager Rosland gave background information about the wine Ordinance 902 -A1.
Council adopted the wine licensing ordinance on April 1, 1985, which allowed sales
of wine only in qualifying restaurants. Sec. 43 of the ordinance provided for
automatic termination of all previously issued licenses and also stated that no
licenses shall be issued after July 1, 1990. There are 3 options:
1. Extend the sunset provision to a future date.
2. Repeal the sunset provision as stated in Sec. 43.
3. Take no action and hold a public hearing
Staff has no objections to wine licensing, it has gone well as a general rule,
with getting paperwork done the only problem and not with wine as a public
nuisance problem.
Member Kelly made the motion to eliminate the sunset provision on Ordinance No.
902 -A1. A second to the motion was made by Member Smith. Member Smith asked of
Attorney Erickson what the effect would be with the elimination of the sunset
provision. Attorney Erickson stated that at any time the ordinance could be
amended, delete or cancel or do whatever is wished. Member Smith asked if this
would condemn anyone's right to sell wine. Attorney Erickson stated that liquor
licenses were not considered a property right so are not subject to claims for
taking them away. Mayor Richards opened up the meeting for questions. Member
Smith asked if this was the appropriate time to strengthen things or fine people
if they don't acquire training. Mayor Richards this is perhaps an appropriate
comment, but a more appropriate time to do this would be when the general
ordinance is being dealt with.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
CONCERN OF RESIDENT REGARDING WALNUT RIDGE PARK CONTINUED TO 4116/90 Manager
Rosland suggested that the Walnut Ridge Park discussion be continued to April 16,.
1990, because the concerned resident is away on vacation.
DISCUSSION HELD ON PRIVATE PARKING LOTS AT FAIRVIEW SOUT ®ALE HOSPITAL AND
SOUTHDALE MEDICAL CLINIC At the March 5, 1990, meeting, staff had presented
information on existing Edina ordinances that would apply to regulation of private
parking lots. Following that discussion, it was a consensus of the Council that
staff bring back further information for discussion regarding additional action
the City could consider.
Planner Larsen has provided the following information in his memo of April 2,
1990. The City of Minneapolis requires a license for all parking lots containing
10 or more parking spaces. All parking lots are subject to design standards and
are reviewed by the Department of Public Works. Commercial parking lots, those
charging for parking, are subject.to further requirements, including signage and
stacking spaces. All parking lot licenses are granted by the Minneapolis City
Council. Key elements of the ordinance relating to Commercial Lots are:
EDINA ORDINANCE MINNEAPOLIS ORDINANCE
Edina requires no license 1. Licenses required for all parking
lots containing 10 or more spaces
- Free Parking: License for initial
application only
- .Commercial lots: Yearly license
required, Fee between $100 -$300
2. Performance Requirements:
All Parking Lots:
A. Yes A. Hard surface required
B. Yes B. Setbacks required
C. Yes C. Landscaping & screening required
D. Yes D. Design and layout subject to
approval,of City Engineer
No Ordinance Requirement 3. Stacking spaces at entrance
(Note: Stacking spaces were required 1 space for self -serve ticket vendor
for review by City Engineer and 3 or 4 for attended lots
No Requirements 4. Sign Requirements
A. Name & phone # of licensee
B. Hours of operation
C. Rates, including minimum rate and
maximum rate for 12 and 24 hours.
D. Size of signs defined in Ordinance
No Ongoing or Periodic 5. Inspections. Authorized as deemed
inspections required. necessary by Department of Licenses.
Manager Rosland stated that staff had met with the Cambridge Group to make it safe
parking. The stance took by the staff is that Cambridge in theory has the right
to do what they want with their property. The responsibility of the City is to
protect public safety. Staff has met with them on a number of occasions, the City
engineers have reviewed it, Hennepin County because of 66th Street has reviewed it
also. The engineering and fire staff has been monitoring the lot, with regard to
stacking on the public streets and emergency vehicles. Manager Rosland noted he
had personally visited the lot which was approximately 50 -60% full. He exited on
66th Street but noted about 35 cars parked in the Southdale area, obviously were
parked there for Southdale Medical which is a safety concern.
Mayor Richards opened up the discussion to the public. The following spoke in
opposition to paid parking that the owners of the Southdale Medical Building have
implemented:
Sarah Foss, resident of Richfield; Gordon Hendrickson, 5708 Upton Av. S.; Paul
Belvedeere, DDS tenant of Southdale Medical Building; Doneta Hoffman, 5825 St.
John's Av., Leanne Tillman, 8370 Red Rock Road, Eden Prairie; Roberta Thorp,
resident of Edina; Dr. William Wright, 6621 Sally Dr., retired pediatrician; Doug
Lambert, DDS, 6205 Hansen Road; Paul Mullin, owner of Foto -Lab in Southdale
Medical Building; Gary Bolmgren, resident of Richfield; and Glenn Hendrickson.
Objections and concerns voiced included: paying for parking at both the hospital
and medical building, access for emergency vehicles, concern for non - ambulatory
patients, building safety, lack of communication between building owners and
tenants, permanent completion of the lot, no means of dropping- off /picking -up of
people, fear of patient and /or doctor egress. Safety for patients choosing to
park in the Southdale Center lot and crossing 66th Street to the Medical Building
was expressed by several persons as well as safety of pedestrians entering the
building from the lot.
Mayor Richards asked what has been done about access to the building for emergency
vehicles in the public right -of -way. Manager Rosland explained that the area had
been examined by the Police and Fire Departments, i.e., curbs, etc. as to adequate
access. Two areas previously mentioned as temporary drive -overs are exactly that,
and will be changed when weather allows construction. One lady has been hit on
the Southdale Center perimeter road coming from the medical building. As the
parking lot is now, no one can be dropped off at the front door, however if you
drive in and stay less than 15 minutes there is no charge.
Planner Larsen then summarized the differences between Edina's ordinance
requirements and the Minneapolis Ordinance. Licensing requirements do not
preclude someone from choosing to charge for parking, no communities were found
that prohibit charging. Mayor Richards asked the City Attorney, if there would be
legal impositions for Edina if the City were to adopt an ordinance to preclude
someone from charging for parking on private property. Attorney Erickson stated
that City Ordinances must be related to the health, safety and welfare of the
community. This charge or no- charge would have to be tied to the existence of a
health or safety factor. If charging begins and it becomes more of a safety risk,
there may be some reason to impose an ordinance restriction. Some nexus would
have to be found between the ordinance and the activity being governed.
Member Paulus asked, if the City were to establish an ordinance regulating parking
lots after the fact, could we require those standards then to be met. Attorney
Erickson commented that Edina has fought that issue with building codes, where a
new building code is adopted, and existing buildings must comply. This has been
won on a health- safety issue, i.e., sprinkler in a basement so firefighters don't
get caught in smoky areas. This could possibly be done if it is a health- safety
feature, otherwise it could be a non - conforming use grandfathered in.
Member Smith whether crossing of 66th Street by pedestrians could be characterized
as a life- saving issue. Attorney Erickson stated no, rather the actual use of the
lot, by virtue of charging, may make it a safety factor. Member Smith asked
whether the City can regulate a drop -off access. Attorney Erickson said yes, if
it were in the public street where it might back up traffic and result in people
getting hurt. This may well have the connection between regulation and the .
health- safety feature it entails. Member Smith asked if it is necessary in every
building to have a public -free access to an automobile without charge. Attorney
Erickson said, no, not without charge but all Edina's code requires all buildings
to have access to public streets. Member Paulus asked if that could be an
ordinance requirement. Attorney Erickson said again only if it has a
health- safety factor to it. Just because the lot does not have free access it
does not necessarily indicate a safety feature. It could be stated that people
could not be dropped off in the public streets, or areas that otherwise would be
posted for no- parking or no- stopping. If there was parking on the street, it
would be difficult to stop and unload someone. If it were a non -stop, non -park
area, it could be said you cannot unload people in those types of zones, and it
could be posted as such.
Member Paulus commented that this is private property and that the issue as to
charging is their decision. She again stated her concern over the stacking of
cars in the lot, the crossovers and the traffic flow. This is one of biggest
health- safety hazards that needs correcting. Signage should state that people
using the lot for parking must have cash upon exiting.
Member Smith stated he recently doctored at another facility with a family member
that had paid parking and did not like it. However it was a part of the facility,
and was out of his control. There is no regulation that states you cannot charge
for parking. He felt there could be better access for emergency vehicles. Also
that the building owners should have been given the tenants more notice on the
paid parking. If the concern is safety, this is an item that can be addressed by
the Council, but an ordinance cannot be designed saying someone cannot charge for
parking.
Member Kelly asked whether this would be brought back as a draft ordinance, or
whether this would be open for discussion again. She stressed the importance of
the safety issue, the need for a charge for licensing, and said a lot of employee
time had been spent on this issue and the City should be reimbursed.
Member Rice suggested that an ordinance be pursued. Cambridge came into Edina,
acted fast and the City had no ordinance permitting or not allowing paid parking
or licensing to happen. He stated if we were starting with a vacant lot, there
would certainly have been more than 24 hours to consider its approval. He
mentioned other paid parking facilities in the area; however they all have a
pick -up /drop -off access. Member Rice said he felt the situation will improve.
The marketplace will tell Cambridge if their decision was good or bad. The
tenants are upset and have communicated that to the owner. If many leave the
building, the owners will rethink their position on paid parking. Safety is the
major concern, but staff feels it is a safe access even though it looks awkward.
There is a feeling that not everything needs to.be regulated but if there are
going to be commercial parking lots in the City, there must be some control over
them, Le, a process and reimbursement for the process.
Mayor Richards in summation said that safety seems to be the biggest concern, and
along with that, regulations about how we would license and inspect, and how we
would see parking lots function. Whether to charge or not to charge should not be
the issue focused on. Access questions have been raised, emergency and
health- safety issues also have been discussed. Mayor Richards asked that staff
draft an ordinance that would address the issues raised to be brought to Council
on May 7, 1990, to which the Council concurred. He also suggested that Cambridge
be notified of the meeting. Member Smith suggested that Cambridge be notified of
the concern for clear access to the front door for drop- off /pick -up.
Dr. Belvedeere asked if he could submit a video tape that he has made of the
parking lot entrances which might help to make a decision. Mayor Richards said
that any information which might help in the decision - making process, should be
submitted to the City staff.
BID AWARDED FOR TOW TRUCK WITH RECOVERY UNIT Public Works Director Francis
Hoffman explained this request was continued from March 5, 1990, meeting. He
noted the attachments in the packet and that the funds come from Central Services
which means other departments benefit from this purchase also. Questions.brought
up about this truck were how often it was used, for just towing and not servicing
or what. He explained that towing costs the City approximately $3,000 - $4,000
annually. This includes Public Works, and the Police and Fire Departments.
During a really cold winter this could be up to $2,000 more per year. Director
Hoffman commented that this appears to be an expensive vehicle, but over 15 years
it appears this would pay for itself. Member Kelly said this is a budgeted item.
Member Kelly made ,a motion to award the bid to purchase the Challenger Model 5601
tow truck from Twin City's Wrecker Sales in the amount of $69,940.00. A second to
the motion was given by Member Rice.
Member Paulus stated this is an awesome amount of money to pay for one tow truck,
is.still grateful that she questioned the cost. Director Hoffman commented that
this is not even the cream of the crop vehicle and is very standard. The Public
Works Department did not request specifications for a super rig.
Member Smith asked if there was a possibility of sharing this with another suburb.
Director Hoffman said the service could be offered and they could use it. The
Police and Fire have mutual aid, and the possibility could be looked into it. He
told that Bloomington has two huge super trucks, completely out of Edina's league.
Member Rice stated that 3 or 4 staff people said that we need this'truck, and he
concurs with them.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards
Nays: Smith
Motion carried.
*BID AWARDED FOR SAND. ROCK, BITUMINOUS MATERIAL. CONCRETE Motion was made by
Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bids to recommended low
bidders as follows: Sand (delivered) to Prior Lake Aggregate at $3.03 per ton;
Buckshot (delivered) to Model Stone at $8.35 per ton; Limestone Class II
(delivered) to Edward Kraemer & Sons for $5.30 per ton; Seal Coat Chips
(delivered) to Dresser Trap Rock for $13.25 per ton; Plant Asphalt #2331 (picked
up) to Commercial Asphalt for $16.20 per ton; Asphalt 2331 Fine (picked -up) to
Midwest Asphalt at $19.10 per ton; Asphalt #2341 (picked -up) to Midwest Asphalt at
$19.20 per ton; Asphalt Winter Mix (picked -up) to Midwest Asphalt for $39.00 per
ton;. Concrete (delivered) to Model Stone for $44.00 cu.yd.; Cut Back Asphalt
(delivered) to Koch Refining at .708 per gallon.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR ONE REVERSIBLE SNOW PLOW AND WING Motion was made by Member
Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for one reversible snow
plow and wing to recommended low bidder, LeRaas Manufacturing_& Sales, at
$10,558.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR ONE 1990 FORD F -800 LIFT TRUCK WITH AN AERIAL BUCKET Motion was
made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for one 1990
Ford F -800 lift truck with an aerial bucket to recommended low bidder, Road
Machinery 6 Supply for $67,108.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR PARKING LOT RECONSTRUCTION AT BRAElLAR GOLF COURSE Motion was
made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for parking
lot reconstruction at the Braemar Golf Course to recommended low bidder Alber
Construction for $168,951.20.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR BRAEMAR SOCCER FIELD RENOVATION Motion was made by Member Smith
and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for the renovation of the Braemar
Soccer Field to recommended low bidder, Perkins Landscape for $9,789.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
I -494 EIS UPDATE GIVEN Engineer Francis Hoffman gave an update of what has been
done so far. Information and evaluating is being done on alternatives for I -494.
The first area of review is immediately south of Edina between TH 100 and old
County Road 18. City staff is working the Mn /DOT, Hennepin County, consultant and
other cities staff to develop and reduce the number of alternatives in each area
that should be studied in detail. Mayor Richards extended thanks to Director
Hoffman and Member Paulus for monitoring this process. The Mayor asked Director
Hoffman to report back to Council again with periodic updates. No action
required.
VACANCY NOTED ON RECYCLING COMMISSION Mayor Richards noted that a vacancy exists
on the Recycling Commission as Ken Joyce is unable to accept appointment that was
done March 5, 1990, to fill the partial term to 2/1/91. The Mayor explained he
has one name submitted to him, and if the Council has names of interested people
to submit those to him. His intention is to appoint someone to fill this vacancy
by the April 16, 1990, meeting. In addition, it was noted by the Mayor that there
is also a vacancy on the Board of Appeals.
REPORT GIVEN ON DOG LICENSING PROCESS - CONTINUED TO APRIL 16, 1990 REGULAR
COUNCIL MEETING Mayor Richards commented the information requested at a previous
Council meeting had been received from Chief Craig Swanson regarding the Edina
process on dog licensing. The Mayor opened up discussion on the process. By
consensus of the Members, this item will be on the April 16, 1990, agenda.
PROPOSED 1990 PROJECTED STORM WATER IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZATION TO BID CONTINUED TO
APRIL 16, 1990, REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Director Hoffman gave background on
proposed stormwater projects to be constructed during 1990 to be funded from the
stormwater utility as follows:
Section I: W. 76th St. & Parklawn, Edina Lake Park $ 9,040.00
Section II: Edina Manor - Grimes & Halifax Avenues
South of W. 58th St. 56,492.00
Section IIA: Edina Manor - Grimes & Halifax Avenues
from MH CB #4 to MH #5 17,902.00
Section III: Sunnyside Av. & Browndale Av. to Creek 97,885.50
Section IV: W. 64th St between Xerxes and Pond 37,795.00
Section V. Yorktown Park Strip from Adams Hill Pond 105.016.00
TOTAL $324,130.50
Director Hoffman said some neighbors in the Halifax /Grimes area are under the
belief that those projects will cause problems for them. Mayor Richards said
those projects would be open for discussion on April 16, 1990, when bids are
awarded. Member Kelly asked whether the Grimes /Halifax area was the area with
flooding problems during the 1987 storm. Director Hoffman said no, the area that
had the bad flooding was just north of 58th & Woodcrest.
Member Bice moved to authorise bids for the projects as presented with the
exception of Sections II and IIA and moved adoption of the following Resolution:
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND
DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
FOR STORM SEWER 'ROVEMENTS NOS. STS -199, STS -200,
STS 201, STS -202 & STS -203
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA:
1. The plans and specifications for the proposed improvements set forth in the
following Advertisement for Bids form, heretofore prepared by the City Engineer,
and now on file in the office of the City Clerk are hereby approved.
2. The Clerk shall cause to be published in the Edina Sun and Construction
Bulletin the following notice of bids for improvements:
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50th Street
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
STORM SEVER
CONTRACT 90 -6 (EKG)
IMPROVEMENT NOS. STS -199. STS -200, STS -201
STS -202 & STS -203
BIDS CLOSE APRIL 12, 1990
Bids will be received and opened in the Council Chambers in Edina City Hall, 4801
West 50th Street at 11:00 A.M., Thursday, April 12, 1990. The Edina City Council
will meet at 7:00 P.M.,. Monday, April 16, 1990, to consider said.bids. The
following are approximate major quantities:
1 EA Storm Water Lift Station
1,855 LF 12 " -27" RCP
11 EA Catch Basins
1,646 LF 16" D.I.P. Force Main
238 LF 6" D.I.P. Force Main
1,490 SY Sod
458 TONS Mn/DOT 2341 Bituminous
1,326 TONS Cl. 5A Gravel
Bids shall be.in a sealed envelope with a'statement thereon showing the work
covered by the bid. Bids should be addressed to the City Engineer, City of Edina,
4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota, 55424, and may be mailed or submitted
personally to the City Engineer. Bids received by the City Engineer, either
through the mail or by personal submission, after the time set for receiving them
maybe returned unopened.
Work must be done as described in plans and specifications on file in the office
of the City Clerk. Plans and specifications are available for a deposit of $25.00
(by check) at the Edina City Hall Engineering Department. Said deposit to be
returned upon return of plans and specifications with a bona fide bid. No bids
rill be considered unless sealed and accompanied by bid bond or certified check
payable to the City of Edina in the amount of at lest ten (10) percent of all
bids. All plans mailed, enclose separate check for $5.00 payable to the City of
Edina for postage and handling.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL.
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
A second to the motion vas made by Member Smith. Mayor Richards asked if there
are storm sewer projects requested that are not being proposed at this time.
Director Hoffman said staff is now working on the largest project which is the
Rolling Green area. Mayor Richards -said the Council should be made aware of any
proposed projects so they could respond to questions from residents.
OPENINGS ON THE MWCC GENERAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE NOMINATION NOTED Mayor Richards
brought to the attention of the Council the need for nominations to the
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission General Advisory Committee of elected
officials and stated that applications would be welcome until mid - April.
ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES NOMINATIONS TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
WANTED FOR MAY 16, 1990 ANNUAL MEETING Mayor Richards asked if Council Members
had any interest in being nominated for the Board of Directors for the AMM, and to
contact these organizations directly.
LETTER RECEIVED FROM RESIDENT MARY ANN MACLENNAN DISCUSSED Member Paulus shared
that she had received a letter from Mary Ann MacLennan stating her concerns
regarding variances and what is happening in the Country Club District as far as
lot sizes, historical places and zoning. Manager Rosland said he would ask the
Planning Department to phone her and discuss her concerns.
PHONE CONVERSATION HELD BETWEEN SARAH JONES OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT AND MAYOR
RICHARDS REGARDING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING IN CONNECTION WITH THE REFERENDUM
Mayor Richards gave background that there was correspondence in the summer of
1989, speaking about the School Board adopting a resolution requesting the Edina
City Council to rebate the excess tax increment revenue resulting from the 1988
referendum for the fiscal year 1989 -90 and annually thereafter. Subsequently,
Mayor Richards told Sarah Jones to submit additional information. Mayor Richards
has received a letter from James Hamann, the Director of Business Services for the
School District, asking the request be added to the agenda of April 16, 1990.
LETTERS RECEIVED FROM ELECTED OFFICIALS RELATIVE TO PENDING LEGISLATION Mayor
Richards stated he had heard from all three of the legislators, Senator Storm, and
Representatives Pauly and Forsythe, noting their position on the tax increment
financing bills and the pay equity issues on comparable worth. Mayor Richards
added he would supply copies to all Council Members plus staff, and it should be
noted that they have responded and acknowledged our positions.
DECISION MADE BY COUNTY ON COMPOSTING TO BE DISCUSSED APRIL 16, 1990 Manager
Rosland noted that Hennepin County had made a decision on composting. This will
discussed further on April 16, 1990, when the Council meets jointly with the
Recycling Commission 6:00 P.M.
STATE LEGISLATURE (SENATE) ATTEMPTS TO PASS BILL THAT EDINA WOULD LOSE $210.000 IN
GAS TAX MONEY Manager Rosland stated the Senate is attempting to pass a bill that
would mean Edina would lose $210,000 in gas tax money. He stated that Edina is
considered a big City with only a few other Cities named, but Edina has been the
focus, and feel Edina is not participator. Manager Rosland said he had spoken to
the AMM and the MLC. They are working hard to remove this from the bill. Mayor
Richards suggested that letters be written to the various bodies we support
financially that lobby on behalf of equity and fairness and make sure they clearly
understand our position. They must be made aware of the situation and be asked to
lobby against the adoption of that legislation. Manager Rosland commented that
two out of the three organizations contacted him this morning and said they would
defend the City. did not vote to join these organizations, if that is the type of
representation we receive. The legislative delegation should be advised about
this.
JOINT MEETING TO BE HELD APRIL 16, 1990 WITH RECYCLING COMMISSION A joint meeting
of the Recycling Commission and the Council will be held at 6:00 P.M. preceding
the regular Council meeting April 16, 1990.
CLOSED MEETING CALLED TO DISCUSS LABOR NEGOTIATIONS AFTER ADJOURNMENT Manager
Rosland said there would be a closed meeting that by law must be approved by the
Council, after the adjournment of this meeting to discuss labor negotiations that
are going on right now with three unions. Notion made by Member Smith to hold
closed meeting following the adjournment of the regular Council Meeting to discuss
labor negotiations. A second to the motion was by Member Kelly.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*CLAIMS PAID Notion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to
approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register
dated 4/2/90 and consisting of 25 pages: General Fund $191,458.21, Communications
$6,122.13, Art Center $7,180.76, Capital Fund $1,149.00, Golf Course Fund
$32,206.97, Recreation Center Fund $8,385.54, Edinborough Park $8,609.16, Utility
Fund $249,023.35, Liquor Dispensary Fund $7,076.66, Construction Fund $1,197.75,
TOTAL $512,409.53. and for confirmation of payment of the following claims as shown
in detail on the Check Register dated 2/28/90 and consisting of 18 pages General
Fund $364,012.68, Art Center $1,354.50, Swimming Pool Fund $289.99, Golf Course
Fund $14,792.15, Recreation Center Fund $15,269.03, Gun Range Fund $604.44,
Edinborough Park $14,454.20, Utility Fund $20,007.41, Storm Sewer Utility $476.61,
Liquor Dispensary Fund $219,974.74, TOTAL $651,235.75.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the
meeting adjourned at 11:15 P.M.
Acting City Clerk
AGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
MAY 7, 1990
7:00 P.M.
(Convene Joint HRA /Council Meeting)
ROLLCALL
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF SPECIAL JOINT HRA /COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 26, 1990
II. EDINA SCHOOLS - REBATE OF EXCESS TAX INCREMENT (Council) (Contd from 4/16/90)
III. AWARD OF BIDS (HRA)
A. Improvement No. PL -2 Centennial Lakes North Pond Wall & Liner
B. Centennial Lakes Park Improvement•- West Side
C. Centennial Lakes Park Building
1. General Construction
2. Electrical Work
IV. ADJOURNMENT OF HRA
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
PROCLAMATION - Edina Bicycle Safety Month
I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS All agenda items marked with an asterisk M
and in bold print are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one
motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Council
Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the
consent agenda and considered i.n its normal sequence on the agenda.
* II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of April 2, 1990
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If
Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote
of all members of Council required to pass if improvement has been petitioned
for; 4/5 favorable rollcall vote required if no petition.
A. Sidewalk Improvement No. S -47 - West 42nd Street from'France Avenue to the
west City Limits
B. Bituminous Street Surfacing, Concrete Curb and Gutter, Storm Sewer and-
Street Lighting Improvement No. BA -291 - West 69th Street from France
Avenue to Xerxes Avenue
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing.
Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote
of all members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property
Zoned Planned District: 3/4 favorable rollcall vote required to pass.
* A. Preliminary Rezoning Approval - PCD -4 Planned Commercial District to PCD -2
Planned Commercial District - Walgreens by Semper Holdings, Inc. - Located
at 4916 France Avenue So (Contd from 4/16/90) (Continue to 5/21/90)
B. Licensing Ordinance for Commercial Parking Lots
C. Lot Division - Lots 11 -13, Block 14, Country Club District Fairway
D. Report on Massing Issue
E. Set Hearing Date (5/21/90)
1. Preliminary Plat Approval - Subdivision of Lot 5, Block 1, Muir Woods
2. " Final Plat Approval - Highcroft Townhomes, Ron Clark Construction -
Cahill Road and Test 70th Street
Edina City Council Agenda
May 7, 1990
Page 2
V. ORDINANCES First Reading Requires offering'of Ordinance only. Second Readin
Favorable rollcall vote of majority of all members of Council required to pas
Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council
required to pass.
A.' First Reading - Ordinance No. 613 - To Update Fire Code to meet
Requirements of new State Fire Code
* B. First Reading - Ordinance No. 803 -A4 - To Delete Limitation of Service by
Commission Members, To Correct Ordinance References, and To Allow Council
to Replace Members Not Residing in City
C. First Reading - Ordinance No. 162 -A2 - To Provide That Failure to Attend
Meetings of Board and Commissions May Result in Removal From Office
VI. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
A. Leo Hopf, 6625 Naomi Drive - Trapping of Beavers in Nine Mile Creek
B. Roger Dreher, 1 Spur Road - Animal Control Ordinance
VII. AWARD OF BIDS
A. Retaining Wall - Braemar Golf Course Lesson Area (Contd from 4/16/90)
* B. Electric Golf Cars
* C. Ice Resurfacing Machine
* D. Goose Control Contract
* E. Mill Pond Weed Harvesting (Contd from 4/16/90)
F. Re -work Peat - Fairway #2 - Braemar Golf Course
VIII. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Tax Increment Districts Update (Contd from 4/16/90)
B. Dog License Renewal Process (Contd from 4/16/90)
C. Report on Request for Vacation of Duggan Plaza (David Reyes)
D. Report on Appeals Court Decision - Animal Control Ordinance
E. Feasibility Report - Storm Sewer Improvements
* F. On -Sale Wine License and On -Sale Beer License - Scott Kee's Tour de
France, 4924 France Av So
IX. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
A. Southwest Suburban Cable Commission
* 1. Resolution Approving Name Change From Rogers Cablesystems To RBL
Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. - D /B /A/ Paragon Cable
2. Amendment to Ordinance No. 1120 - To Change Name of Grantee
B. Resolution In Support of Minneapolis Application to Legislative Commission
on Minnesota Resources To Conduct Study of Upper Mississippi River
C. 1990 AMM Annual Meeting - May 16
D. LMC 1990 Annual Conference - June 12 -15
X. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
XI. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
XII. FINANCE
* A. Payment of Claims per Check Register dated 05/07/90: Total $820,277.49 and
Confirmation of payment of Claims per Check Register dated 03/31/90: Total
$529,871.70.
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Tues May -15 .School District Election
Wed May 16 AMM Annual Meeting 5:30 p.m. McGuire's Inn
Second Century Forum 7:00 p.m. Community Center
Mon May 21 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room
Mon May 28 MEMORIAL DAY OBSERVED (City Hall Closed)
Mon June 4 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room
June 12 -15 LMC Convention Duluth, MN
Mon June 18 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room
J
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF THE
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY /CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT EDINA CITY HALL
MARCH 26, 1990
A special joint meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the
City Council was convened for a public hearing on the 1990 Amendment to the 50th
and France Redevelopment Plan on March 26, 1990 at 7:00 p.m. Action was taken by
the HRA and Council as recorded.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners /Members Paulus, Rice, Smith and
Richards.
PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED: RESOLUTIONS APPROVING 1990 AMENDMENT TO 50TH & FRANCE
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN ADOPTED Pursuant to due notice given, a public hearing was
conducted on the proposed amendment to the 50th & France Redevelopment Plan.
Public attending included Gail Korst, Korst Sons Jewelers, 3901 W. 50th Street;
Art Dickey, Arthur Dickey Architects, Inc., 4930 France Avenue; and Allen Siegman,
Waterstreet Clothing Company, 3940 W. 50th Street.
HRA Executive Director Gordon Hughes informed the HRA and Council that the effect
of the proposed amendment to the 50th & France Redevelopment Plan would be
two -fold:
1. The amendment would allow the use of tax increments to finance the public
improvement project at 50th & France which is estimated to cost $3,000,000.
2. The amendment would allow pooling of tax increments from the 50th & France
Redevelopment District and the Southeast Edina Redevelopment District. The
amendment would permit, but not obligate, the City to use pooled increments
from one district to the other.
Director Hughes said that notice of the March 26, 1990 public hearing was given to
the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners and the Board of Education for the
Edina School District on February 23, 1990. Both agencies were provided with
copies of the proposed amendment.
Chairman /Mayor Richards called for public comment following a five minute delay so
that individuals arriving late would have the opportunity to speak to the proposed
amendment. No public comment was heard.
Commissioner Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING 1990 AMENDMENT TO
50TH & FRANCE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND
REQUESTING THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY COUNCIL
BE IT RESOLVED, by The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota
(the "HRA "), as follows:
1. Proposed Amendment. The HRA has approved a redevelopment plan, as
defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.002, subdivision 16, designated as the
50th & France Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan "), and a redevelopment
project to be undertaken pursuant thereto, as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 469.002, subdivision 14 (the "Redevelopment Project "), and that in order
to finance the public redevelopment costs to be incurred by the HRA in connection
with the Redevelopment Plan and the Redevelopment Project, the Redevelopment Plan
established a tag increment financing district, as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 469.174, subdivision 9 (the "District ") which is designated by Hennepin
County as Tag Increment Financing District No. 1200. It has been proposed that
the HRA approve an amendment to the Redevelopment Plan which is• entitled "1990
Amendment to the 50th & France Redevelopment Plan" (the "1990 Amendment ") to
authorize the expenditure of tag increment-to finance additional public
improvements in the area'subject to the Redevelopment Plan, to expand the area
t
subject to the Redevelopment Plan to include the area subject to the Southeast
Edina Redevelopment Plan of the HRA (the "Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan ") and
to authorize the expenditure of tax increment revenue derived from the District to
pay for public redevelopment costs incurred and to be incurred by the HRA and the
City of Edina in connection with the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan and
redevelopment projects undertaken pursuant thereto and to pay debt service on
bonds issued and to be issued to finance such public redevelopment costs.
2. Approval of 1990 Amendment. The 1990 Amendment has been presented to
this Board and is ordered placed on file in the office of the Executive Director
of the HRA. The 1990 Amendment is hereby approved. As stated in the 1990
Amendment, the 1990 Amendment further serves the original goals and purposes of
the City and HRA in approving the Redevelopment Plan and the Southeast Edina
Redevelopment Plan which is of benefit to all residents of the City.
3. Pledge Agreement. The officers of the HRA are authorized to enter into
an agreement or agreements with the City to evidence the pledge of tax increments
from the - District to pay debt service on bonds or other obligations issued and to
be issued by the City to finance public redevelopment costs of the Southeast Edina
Redevelopment Plan.
4. Presentation to City Council. The 1990 Amendment hereby approved shall
be presented to the City Council for a public hearing thereon pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.029, subdivision 6 and Section 469.175,
subdivision 4.
Dated the 26th day of March, 1990.
ATTEST:
Chairman
Executive Director
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Commissioner Rice.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Resolution adopted.
Member Rice introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING 1990 AMENDMENT TO
50TH & FRANCE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND MAKING
FINDINGS WITH RESPECT THERETO AND PLEDGING TAX
INCREMENT TO CERTAIN OUTSTANDING BONDS OF THE CITY
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows:
1. The Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina,
Minnesota (the "HRA "), and the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City "), have
previously approved the Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan ") and a
Redevelopment Project (the "Redevelopment Project ") to be undertaken pursuant
thereto and in order to finance the public redevelopment costs to be incurred by
the City and the HRA in connection with the Redevelopment Plan and the
Redevelopment Project, the Redevelopment Plan established a tax increment
financing district (the "District ") which is designated by Hennepin County as Tax
Increment Financing District No. 1200. The Board of Commissioners of the HRA has
approved an amendment to the Redevelopment Plan which is entitled "1990 Amendment
to the 50th & France Redevelopment Plan "(the "1990 Amendment "). The 1990
Amendment authorizes additional public improvements to be constructed in the area
subject to the Redevelopment Plan, expands the area subject to the Redevelopment
Plan to include the area subject to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan of the
BRA (the "Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan ") and authorizes the expenditure of
tax increment revenues derived from the District to pay the costs of such public
improvements and to pay for public redevelopment costs incurred and to be incurred
by the HRA and the City in connection with the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan
and redevelopment projects undertaken pursuant thereto and to pledge tax increment
revenue from the District to the payment of debt service on bonds heretofore and
hereafter issued by the City to finance such costs.
2. This Council on March 26, 1990, held a public hearing on the 1990
Amendment after notice of the public hearing was published in the official
newspaper of the City not less than ten (10) days prior to the date of the
hearing. At such public hearing all persons desiring to be heard with respect to
the 1990 Amendment were given an opportunity to express their views with respect
thereto.
3. The 1990 Amendment is hereby approved. The 1990 Amendment serves to meet
the goals and objectives of the Redevelopment Plan and the Southeast Edina
Redevelopment Plan. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision
4, and for reasons set forth in the Redevelopment Plan, as amended by the 1990
Amendment and the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan it is hereby found that:
(A) The proposed development to be undertaken in accordance with the
Redevelopment Plan, as amended by the 1990 Amendment and the Southeast Edina
Redevelopment Plan, in the opinion of this Council would not occur solely
through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and
therefor the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary.
(B) The Redevelopment Plan, as amended by the 1990 Amendment,
conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole.
(C) The Redevelopment Plan, as amended by the 1990 Amendment, will
afford maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a
whole for the development of the area subject to the Redevelopment Plan and
the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan.
4. Pledge of Tax Increment. The City has previously issued and there is
presently outstanding the following bonds to finance public redevelopment costs
incurred by the City and HRA pursuant to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan
(the "Bonds "):
The•City hereby pledges to the Bonds tax increment revenue derived from the
District received by the City from the MICA to pay the Bonds. The officers of the
City are hereby authorized to enter into an agreement or agreements with the HRA
to evidence such pledge of the tax increment revenue from the District to the
payment of debt service on the Bonds.
Adopted by the Council this 26th day of March, 1990.
FAV4 * *6
City Clerk
Mayor
Title -
Dated
Original Principal Amount
a.
G.O. Tax Increment
October 1, 1981
$4,500,000
Bonds, Series 1981
b.
G.O. Tax Increment
August 1, 1986
4,000,000
Bonds, Series 1986A
c.
G.O. Tax Increment
October 1, 1988
10,175,000
Bonds, Series 1988
d.
G.O. Taxable Tax
October 1, 1988
5,100,000
Increment Bonds,
Series 1988
e.
G.O. Taxable Tax
April 1, 1989
5,300,000
Increment Bonds,
Series 1989
f.
G.O. Tax Increment
April 1, 1989
8,425,000
Bonds, Series 1989
g.
G.O. Tax Increment
November 1, 1989
12,970,000
Refunding Bonds,
Series 1989
The•City hereby pledges to the Bonds tax increment revenue derived from the
District received by the City from the MICA to pay the Bonds. The officers of the
City are hereby authorized to enter into an agreement or agreements with the HRA
to evidence such pledge of the tax increment revenue from the District to the
payment of debt service on the Bonds.
Adopted by the Council this 26th day of March, 1990.
FAV4 * *6
City Clerk
Mayor
i
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Paulus.
Rollcall: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Resolution adopted.
There being no further business on the HRA /Council Agenda, the meeting was
adjourned at 7:14 p.m. by motion of Commissioner/Member Smith, seconded by
Commissioner/Member Rice. Motion carried unanimously.
HRA Executive Director
City Clerk
A.
oe71
ch
o
�=� y
A
a
� • RPOiN tiO/
1
298
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: HRA AND COUNCIL
From: GORDON L. HUGHES
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Date: MAY 7, 1990
Subject: REBATE OF EXCESS
TAX INCREMENT
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # HWCOUNCIL II.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends
To HRA
0
To Council
Action ❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
0
Discussion
Continued from April 16, 1990 regular Council meeting.
Info /Background:
;r
. i
• �VR7q'trpp/..��
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: HRA AND COUNCIL
From: GORDON L. HUGHES
i EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Date: APRIL 16, 1990
Subject: REBATE OF EXCESS
TAX INCRFIIENT
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
HRA
COUNCIL III.
Consent
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends
To HRA
To Council
Action
�!
Motion
Resolution
L'
Ordinance
Discussion
Consider rebate to Edina School District of Excess Tax Increments from 50th
& France and Grandview tax increment financing districts resulting from the
1988 School District Referendum.
Info/Background-
Attached is a letter dated March 30, 1990, from James Hamann, Assistant
Superintendent of Business Services for the Edina Public Schools. This
letter renews the request of the Board of Education that the City rebate
tax increments which resulted from the 1988 School Tax Referendum. This
request was considered but not acted upon by the City Council at its July
24, 1989 meeting. Attached for your review is a copy of the July 24, 1989,
staff report.
According to our information, the 1990 payable increments resulting from
the 1988 referendum, total $57,535. According to Dr. Hamman's letter of
'larch 30, 1990, the return of this amount of excess increments would not
result in additional revenues for the school district. Rather, it would
result in a reduction in the school's mill rate. In that the school's _
levy has already been certified for 1990 payable taxes, a rebate, if
approved, should be for the payable 1991 taxes.
Report /Recommendation
April 16, 1990
Page Two
When this issue was considered in July of 1989, staff understood that the
rebate of the excess increments would result in additional revenues to the
school district. Apparently this is not the case, based on Dr. Hamman's
March 30, 1990, letter. Therefore I am concerned as to whether there is
any real benefit that is derived by the district from this rebate. If the
Council wishes to proceed with this rebate, I suggest that it be instituted
for payable 1991 taxes and that the amount of the rebate should be
conditioned on the collection of at least 95% of the taxes from each tax
increment financing district, i.e., no more than a 58 delinquency rate of
total tax revenue. I would also recommend that the rebate be applied only
for 1991 and that it be considered annually thereafter.
E "C.ARE
YE DARE
SHARE
ova,
�701
March 30, 1990
Mr. Fred Richards, Mayor
Edina City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Fred,
PUBLIC
S C H 0 0 L S This letter is a follow -up to a recent conversation that I
understand you had with Sarah Jones, Chairperson of the
Edina. Board of Education. The purpose of that conversation
as well as this letter is to ask that you consider putting
the matter of excess tax increment revenue from the 1988
school tax referendum before the Edina City Council.
Enclosed with this letter is a copy of the resolution
approved by the Board of Education several months ago as
well as Superintendent Smyth's letter to the City Manager.
The background information to the resolution explains how
the excess revenue concept works.
If the shift of revenue from the city to the school district
is approved it will not actually increase revenue for the
school district. The district's subsequent levy authority
(to be approved in the fall of 1990 for the school year
1991 -92) will be reduced by the amount of the excess tax
increment revenue. In effect, the whole thing is revenue
neutral for the school district. With the reduction
adjustment to the levy authority there is, of course, a
small reduction to Edina taxpayers. This is an excellent
opportunity for the Edina City Council and the Edina Board
of Education to work together in a way that will benefit the
tax - paying citizens in the school district who are also
residents of the city by reducing-taxes slightly. It is not
a significant amount of tax dollars, but nevertheless an
opportunity for some positive publicity in the community
through a joint effort of the two local taxing authorities.
If you would like to discuss this matter further please do
not hesitate to give me a call or you may wish to visit with
Gordon Hughes on the city staff. Gordon and I have studied
this matter together so that we are both knowledgeable about
it.
6701
Sincerely,
ORMANDALE
i
James A. Hamann
DINA
Assistant Superintendent
for Business Services
M I N N E S O T A
56424
JAH /mef
Enc.
cc: Sarah Jones
612- 920.2980
Ray Smyth
N E O A A E
N A R E
000,
- - . P - U B - L I C
S C N 0 O L S
„ye,
June. 22, 1989
Mr. Ken Rosland, City Manager
Edina City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Ken,
You may be aware that legislation passed during the
1988 session provides for some changes with respect to
tax increment financing districts. One of the changes
makes it permissible for a city to rebate to a school
district excess tax increment revenue generated by a
school district referendum levy. The Edina Board of
Education recently approved a resolution to request
that such a rebate be made. I have enclosed a copy of
that resolution.
The purpose of this letter is to ask you to put this
matter on the agenda of a future meeting of the Edina
City Council for consideration. Members of your staff,
Gordon Hughes and Erik Anderson, have met with Jim
Hamann on this to review the provision in the law and
to work up the financial numbers. You may want to
visit with any or all of them for more information.
Your early attention to resolution of this request by
the Board of Education will be very much appreciated-.
Sincl6reW,
Rayr coa P. Smyth
F 1 F T r F I v E Su¢¢erintendent
FTr FIVE mef
Enc.
,T 7 0 T N
S T R E E T
E 0 1 N A M N
5 5 4 3 5
619_AAA.9R11
689
FOR ACTION INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 273
Regular Meeting, June 12, 1989
Volume 60, Report 603
SUBJECT: EXCESS TAX INCREMENT REVENUE FROM THE 1988
REFERENDUM
Be it Resolved, That
The Board of Education
Request the Edina City Council to rebate
the excess tax increment revenue resulting
from the 1988 referendum for the fiscal year
1989 -90 and annually thereafter.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The City of Edina contains four tax increment financing
districts, two of which (50th and France District and
Grandview District) are inclusive within the school
district. when these TIF districts were established the
base or first year valuation of the districts was captured
for taxing jurisdictions such as the school district or
county, which means that tax revenue for the school district
from the TIF districts remains fixed for a 20 to 25 year
period. Because the TIF districts do increase in value the-
city is able to generate incremental tax revenue (difference
between the fixed amount and current or incremental
valuation). These incremental tax revenues are used to
retire the development bonds and other costs of development.
When the voters of the school district authorized by
referendum an additional levy, the result of applying the
additional levy on the incremental or current value is the
generation of "windfall" revenue to the development (TIF)
district. This phenomenon directs revenue to the TIF
district through no action on the part of the city instead
of producing revenue for the school district for whose
benefit the levy was created.
The 1988 amendments to the Minnesota Tax Increment Financing
Act include a provision whereby a city with tax increment
financing districts may pay excess tax increment revenue
generated by a referendum levy to the school district
o
O
• � ~nJR10W`����
aas
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
T0: HRA
From: GORDON L. HUGHES
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Date: JULY 24, 1989
Subject:
EXCESS TAX INCREMENT
REVENUE - 50TH & FRANCE
AND GRANDVIEW
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # HRA II.
Consent ❑
- - Information Only
Mgr . Recommends HE
To HRA
❑
To Council
Action ❑
Motion
0
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Authorize the rebating to the Edina School District of excess tax
increments from 50th & France and Grandview resulting from the 1988
school district referendum for payable 1989 taxes. Rebate to occur
after the receipt of 1989 tax settlement and conditioned upon a
collection of at least 95% of expected taxes.
Info/Background-
Attached is a letter and a Resolution from the Edina School District
concerning excess tax increments from the Grandview and 50th & France
tax increment districts. As noted in the Board's resolution, the voters
of the Edina school district authorized an additional levy in October,
1988. This additional levy resulted in a higher mill rate (i.e. tax
capacity rate) within the 50th & France and Grandview tax increment
districts. This increased mill rate resulted in a tax increment
windfall for these two districts in the amount of $49,060 for payable
1989 taxes.
As noted in the Board's resolution, 1988 amendments to the Tax Increment
Financing Act include a provision whereby the City can rebate to school
districts the excess tax increment generated by a referendum levy.
According to the Tax Increment Financing Act, the City may elect to
rebate such excess increments but is not obligated to do so.
Report /Recommendation
Excess Tax Increment Revenue]
July 24, 1989
Page Two
Based upon the above facts and circumstances, the Edina School District
-_ -.. requests that the City authorize the rebate of the excess increments.
The Board's resolution requests that this rebate.start with the 1989 tax
increments and continue annually thereafter. Due to ongoing changes in
tax increment financing laws, staff recommends that the rebate be
authorized for the payable 1989 tax increments only, and that this
resolution should be reviewed and considered annually in regard to
future payments of excess increments. We also recommend that the amount
of the rebate should be conditioned on the collection of at least 95% of
the taxes from each district, i.e., no more than a S% delinquency rate
of total tax revenue.
gtrls. J�l�
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: HRA
FROM: Gordon Hughes, E;;ecutive Director
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: May 7, 1990
AGENDA ITEM I I I. A.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Improvement No. PL -2 Centennial Lakes North Pond
Wall & Liner
Company Amount of Quote or &d
1. F. M. Frattalone Excavating &.Grading Inc. 1. $ 625,386.66
2. Lovering- Johnson,.Inc. 2.. $ 642,282.25
3• George F. Cook Construction Co. 3.
$ 670,026.61
4. Veit & Company, Inc. 4.
$ 697,386.13
5. C. S. McCrossan Construction, Inc. 5. $1,064,997.00
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
F. M. Frattalone. Excavating &•Grading, Inc. $ 625,386.66
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This is the construction project for Centennial Lakes Phase
1 Lake Construction - North Pond. This project will complete
the north pond with sodding over the balance of the north
park and sodding and irrigation on the east portion of the
central park. The project will be funded through HRA funds.
The Recommended bid is
within budget not within
)
Department
,rd n allin, Finance Direct " r
th Rosland, ity Manager
, 'p?
Cn REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: HRA
FROM:. Gordon .Hughes, Assistant City Manager
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00
DATE: May 7, 1990 AGENDA ITEM HRA III.s.
ITEM. DESCRIPTION: Centennial Lakes Central Park West Side Improvements
Companv Amount of Quote or &d
1. Shaw- Lundquist_ Assoc. 1, $1,496,790.20
2. Cy -Con, Inc. 2. 1,524,654:50
3. C. S. McCrossan 3, 1,588,820.16
4. Lovering- Johnson, Inc. 4, 1,606,819.00
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Shaw- Lundquist Assoc. $1,496,790.20
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This bid is for the walkways, lighting,.landscaping, and all related
work for the west side of central park. The project will be- funded
through HRA funds as part of the Centennial Lakes project.
Signature
The Recommended bid is
Department.
f:
�i
within budget not withiwbu0g-e/t
Kenneth Roslan6, City Manager
ti
1^
o e''
H o
ti
��• f ~R]RI'OM'�O�
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: HRA
From: GORDON HUGHES �
ASSISTANT CIT GER
Date: MAY 7, 1990
Subject: CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK
IMPROVEMENT — WEST SIDE
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # HRA III . B.
Consent ❑
Information Only [ 7x
Mgr. Recommends To HRA
❑ To Council
Action ❑ Motion
_ ❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Attached is a letter from Borgert Products, Inc. regarding the concrete pavers
which were specified for Centennial Lakes. Borgert objects to the fact that
its concrete paver was not accepted for use at Centennial Lakes.
Also attached is a letter from Arijs Pakalns of BRW which explains BRI -I's
reasoning in rejecting this prodict.
I concur with BRW's recommendation.
Info /Background:
0 T H U 1 2 47 D 0 R G E R T C ID N C P. E T E p . 02
• 8646 RIDGEWObD RD;
P.O. BOX 39
ST, JOSEPH, MN 66374
6121363-4671
MN 1-800. 622-4952
ld IN /I
o!
E __ 'z,7 14:44 BRW INC.
BUR
?AW INC. THRESHER SQUARE
May, 4, 1990
Mr. Gordon Hughes
Assisstant City Manager
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Gordon:
700 THIRD STREET SGU7,. MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55415
P.
PANNING
TRANSPORTATION
ENGINEERING
URBAN DESIGN
P',ONE: 412. 370.0700 FAX: 812�370.1378
In regards to the special concrete unit pavers for the Centennial Lakes Park,
the following is a brief summary of the process we went through in selecting the
pavers.
Initially, in the early stages of the design for the Park, the decision was made
to use high - quality materials to complement the high- quality developments being
proposed for the project. For this reason, we selected the concrete pavers which
are manufactured by Courtland Landscape Products as our standard.
In the construction documents we indicated that the Courtland pavers are an accepted
paver but that we would approve other pavers, if they would meet our established
standards.
During the bid period, Borgert Products, Inc. asked us to accept their pavers
as an approved equal. We met with the Borgert representatives, received all necessary
information and obtained sample pavers for out review. In our evaluation we found
that the Borgert pavers do not meet our standards:
• The surface finish is rough and very porous.
• The beveled edges are highly pronounced and noticeable.
• The edge finish is rough and easily chipped.
• The corners are quite rounded, which would exposes larger
joints -- especially in the curving band.patterns.
° Overall, the Borgert pavers have too much.of a "rustic"
and rough appearance which we think is not appropriate
for this project.
For these reasons we feel we could not accept the Borgert pavers as an approved
equal.
Or '�E SENNF r r Gt ALN R..NC , K, Y
.1•:IU. __' +'JCTT
,..•c_
: i�'AlG'N R�NCiyCiSh •'.k.r' ?r1C:P:J.;. ... h'_..1
�" .
�i .•:V /.iehC :. ..:.i�ONE�
MARK ii
.GI:N O '&N.MARA i CJ 11;CG 3 F'IL;Dn 4t
:.FNNI4.1.:;U1 L.F •.
= PFRC'r I F -V }:: i'I
- _. , �. _ ::A1 .`.+VIU L. GAP,' LNW
MINNEAPOLIS
DENVER
PHOENIX
TUCSON
ST PETERSBURG
SEP 03 '90 14:45 BRW INCo
Mr. Gordon Hughes
May 5, 1990
Page 2
P.
I hope this clarifies the issue. If you have any queestions, please call me.
Si nc rel
Arijs Pakalns AIA,AICP
Senior Associate
cc: Peter Jarvis, BRW, Inc.
AP /akm
DATE: MAY 6, 1990
RE: CONCRETE PAVERS AT CENTENNIAL LAKES, EDINA
APRIL 17, 1990
Delivered samples to Arijs Pakalns at B.R.W.
1) Requested pave edge as alternate to angle iron.
2) Borgert Products paving stone samples as alternate.
Comments from Arijs Pakalns of B.R.W.
1) Size not right.
2) Need color samples.
APRIL 19, 1990
Delivered to Arijs Pakalns of B.R.W.
1) Red and brown flash as specified by Mr. Pakalns.
2) Measured stone for consistency of length and width.
Comments, from Arijs Pakalns of B.R.W.
1) Color not quite there.
2) Size would be alright.
Drove to job to visually inspect the color
1) I determined that color was a red, charcoal, brown mixture.
2) 1 telephoned Mr. Pakalns from the job site to discuss the
color and he told me that the samples I left of the red,
brown did look pretty good.
APRIL 23, 1990
Delivered samples of red, brown, charcoal blend to Arijs Pakalns via
courier.
APRIL 25, 1990
Telephoned Arijs Pakalns of B.R.W. for comment on new samples
1) Color was fine.
2) Size was fine.
3). Bevelled edge not acceptable.
4) Texture not acceptable.
5) He informed me that the decision was made by a committee.
page 2
I asked Mr. Pakalns if I could meet with some or all of the
committee people at the job to compare pavers already installed.
1) Mr. Pakalns response was negative.
Edina City Hall - I talked with Mr. Gordon Hughes about the problems
I was having in getting the paving stones approved.
1) Mr. Hughes said he would call Arijs Pakalns about the
matter.
APRIL, 26, 1990
Telephoned Gordon Hughes to inquire about the response he received
from Mr. Pakalns .
1) Response from Mr. Hughes was that as a committee B.R.W.
had not accepted paving stone for same reasons discussed on
April 25.
I asked Gordon what my next step would be if 1. wished to
proceed in this matter.
1) Gordon informed me that I should get on the agenda for the
city council meeting scheduled for May 7th, which is the
same date that the job is to be let.
If the job would have been specified, "manufacturer of product and or
equal ", there would have been no problem with bidding this job in the
normal procedure. By having Division 1 and leaving all acceptable product
decisions up to one person or committee only one product may be
specified, even if products vary only slightly. I feel very strongly that it
is a diservice to the taxpayer to have only one material specified . I do
feel that more than one product, (in each category), should not only be a
responsiblilty but a requirment to insure that taxpayers who support
these types of projects are getting quality as well as competative bids.
Borgert Products was one to the first manufacturers of concrete pavers in
the United States, the first in the State of Minnesota. We manufacture our
pavers on one of the- finest most advance machines available in the world
ty9i��lj,
tt\' REQUEST FOR P R
.�°i U CHASE
TO: HRA
FROM: GORDON L. HUGHES, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager -
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000
MAY 7, 1990
DATE: AGENDA ITEM HRA i I I . C
ITEM DESCRIPTION: CENTENNIAL LAKE PARK PAVILLION - GENERAL CONSTRUCTION
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1• TWIN -CITY CONSTRUCTION 1• $ 649.,543
2• LUND- MARTIN 2• 659,350
3• LOVERING- JOHNSON, 3• 765,600
4• SHAW - LUNDQUIST 4• 808,800
5•. PALANI 5. 830,000
6. UNIPRO 6. 910,000
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
TWIN CITY CONSTRUCTION $649,543
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This bid.is for general construction for,the Centennial Lakes
park pavillion.
Signature / Depart ent
The Recommended bid is
within budget not witWh dget. Wallin, Fi, rice Direct
L.
Kenneth Ro and, City Manager
t.
ch
• ,N�APOW`S��/
ieee
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis Hoffman
City Engineer
Date: 7 May, 1990
Subject: Public Hearing -
Sidewalk
W. 42nd St. from West
City Limits to
France Ave.
Improvement No. S -47
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
III' A-
Consent
❑
ch
• ,N�APOW`S��/
ieee
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis Hoffman
City Engineer
Date: 7 May, 1990
Subject: Public Hearing -
Sidewalk
W. 42nd St. from West
City Limits to
France Ave.
Improvement No. S -47
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
III' A-
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
0
To Council
Action
0
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
A. Authorize Improvement Project S -47.
B. If deemed appropriate, indicate Council direction for size of
assessment area, Area 1 (larger area) or Area 2 (smaller area).
Info/Background-
City Council received a petition for a sidewalk on West 42nd Street from the
west City limits to France Avenue. The petition included 91 signatures of
which all were within Area 1 on attached hearing notice map. Of the 91
signatures, twenty six signatures were outside of Area 2 (smaller proposed
assessment area).
Also attached is a portion of the Edina Comprehensive Land Use Plan as it
relates to sidewalks. This is the 1980 plan which will be updated during
1990 as it relates to sidewalks. Staff believes that the petition submitted
for sidewalk is consistent with the goals and objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan.
(M
Report /Recommendation
Public Hearing - Sidewalk
W. 42nd Street from West
City Limits to France Ave.
Improvement No. 5 -47
Page Two
The proposed project would be to place sidewalk on the south side of West
42nd Street from the west City limits to Grimes Avenue because existing side
street sidewalks would tie -in the proposed walkway. The proposed sidewalk
location-from Grimes to France on West 42nd would be the north side due to
ease of construction on the north versus south side. The cross -over point
at Grimes and West 42nd Street would be considered safe since a 4 -way STOP
sign condition exists.
The proposed project cost is estimated at $95,278.86 which would result in
an estimated assessment of $245.56 for each lot in Area 1 or if Area 2 is
used, an estimated assessment of $560.46 per lot. Also, a note from the
previous Morningside reconstruction project in 1978 -79, all lots were
assessed the same per lineal foot assessment of $29.40 per assessable foot.
(This means that people with or without sidewalk in that project were not
treated differently.)
Staff will make a full presentation at the Council meeting. Attached is all
correspondence received on this issue to date.
Report /Recommendation
Public Hearing - Sidewalk
W. 42nd Street from West
City Limits to France Ave.
Improvement No. 5 -47
Page Two
The proposed project would be to place sidewalk on the south side of West
42nd Street from the west City limits to Grimes Avenue because existing side
street sidewalks would tie -in the proposed walkway. The proposed sidewalk
location-from Grimes to France on West 42nd would be the north side due to
ease of construction on the north versus south side. The cross -over point
at Grimes and West 42nd Street would be considered safe since a 4 -way STOP
sign condition exists.
The proposed project cost is estimated at $95,278.86 which would result in
an estimated assessment of $245.56 for each lot in Area 1 or if Area 2 is
used, an estimated assessment of $560.46 per lot. Also, a note from the
previous Morningside reconstruction project in 1978 -79, all lots were
assessed the same per lineal foot assessment of $29.40 per assessable foot.
(This means that people with or without sidewalk in that project were not
treated differently.)
Staff will make a full presentation at the Council meeting. Attached is all
correspondence received on this issue to date.
E Ian
NOTICE OF PUBLIC BEARING
SIDEWALK
IMPROVEMIINP NO. S -47
The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City,Hall on Monday, May 7, 1990
at 7:00 P.M. to hold a formal Public Hearing on the construction of sidewalk on
West 42nd Street from France Avenue to the West City Limits of Edina. This
hearing has been called as a result of a petition from 91 residents in this area
for better pedestrian access to Weber Park, school bus stops, the France Avenue
MTC bus stop and generally as a connector route. This hearing is being con-
ducted under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. The pro-
posed sidewalk will be located on the south side from the west City Limits' on
West 42nd Street to Grimes- Avenue. East of Grimes, the sidewalk would be on the
north side of West 42nd Street going to France Avenue.
This is considered a formal hearing since it is proposed that the entire cost of
the improvement be paid from assessments. Under present City policy, mainte-
nance (snow removal) of the sidewalk will be the responsibility of the adjacent
property owners. The estimated construction cost of the project is $95,278.86.
The proposed assessment would be between $245.56 and $560.46 per lot, depending
on the actual assessment area.
The first proposed assessment area is the largest suggested area and includes
all petitioners for this project. See attached map.
The second proposed assessment area is a smaller suggested area which does not
include all the petitioners but would be more consistent with the potential as-
sessment district for this type of project. See attached map.
These proposed assessments would be divided over a ten year period with interest
accumulating on the unpaid balance.
The sidewalk is- proposed to be five feet wide and constructed of concrete. The
alignment will be varied to protect existing property features to the greatest
extent possible. The proposed project would be constructed in 1990.
Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is
listed to you is among those properties which are considered to be benefited by
the improvement.
Notice of Public Hearing
Sidewalk Improvement 5 -47
Page Two
The area that may be assessed for the proposed improvement is as follows:
c
Tract A, RLS 567; Tracts A, B, C, D & E, RLS 650; Tracts A & B, RLS 1517; Lots 1
thru 3 & 8 thru 11, Blk. 1, Lots 1 thru 9, Blk. 2, & Lots 1 thru 9, Blk. 3,
Morningside Oaks Addn.; Lots 1 thru 10 & 12 & 13, Blk. 1, Lots 1 thru 19 & 22
thru 26, Blk. 2, Lots 1 thru 19 & 22 thru 26, Blk. 3, & Lots 1 thru 18 & 21 thru
26, Blk. 4, Minikanda Vista Third Addn.; Lots 1 thru 14, 16 & 17 & 19 & 20,
William Scott's Addn.; Lots 1 thru 4, Blk. 1, William Scott's Addn. Peterson
Replat; Lots 1 thru 12, A and B Addn.; Lots 1 & 2, Blk. 1, Lots 1 & 2, Blk. 2,
and Outlots 1 and 2, Morningside Manor; Lots 1 thru 8, Blk. 1, & Lots 1 thru 12,
Blk. 2, Mickelsen's Re- arrangement Morningside Minn.; Lots 1 thru 5, Wooddale
Heights 2nd Addn.; Lots 1 thru 26, Blk. 1, Lots 1 thru 26, Blk. 2, and Lots 8
thru 19, Blk. 3, Crocker & Crowell's First Addn.; Lots 1 & 2, Blk. 1, Morine's
Addn.; and Lots 14 thru 78, Morningside Addn.
Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding this improve-
ment may be forwarded to -the City Council or Engineering Department prior to the
hearing or presented at the hearing itself. If you desire additional informa-
tion, please call me at 927 -8861 between 8:00 A.M. and 4:30 P.M., Monday through
Friday.
The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close
of the hearing.
Thank you.
Francis J."Hoffman, P.E.
Director of Public Works
and City Engineer
FJH /clf
f'.
_.
L
Notice of Public Hearing
Sidewalk Improvement 5 -47
Page Two
The area that may be assessed for the proposed improvement is as follows:
c
Tract A, RLS 567; Tracts A, B, C, D & E, RLS 650; Tracts A & B, RLS 1517; Lots 1
thru 3 & 8 thru 11, Blk. 1, Lots 1 thru 9, Blk. 2, & Lots 1 thru 9, Blk. 3,
Morningside Oaks Addn.; Lots 1 thru 10 & 12 & 13, Blk. 1, Lots 1 thru 19 & 22
thru 26, Blk. 2, Lots 1 thru 19 & 22 thru 26, Blk. 3, & Lots 1 thru 18 & 21 thru
26, Blk. 4, Minikanda Vista Third Addn.; Lots 1 thru 14, 16 & 17 & 19 & 20,
William Scott's Addn.; Lots 1 thru 4, Blk. 1, William Scott's Addn. Peterson
Replat; Lots 1 thru 12, A and B Addn.; Lots 1 & 2, Blk. 1, Lots 1 & 2, Blk. 2,
and Outlots 1 and 2, Morningside Manor; Lots 1 thru 8, Blk. 1, & Lots 1 thru 12,
Blk. 2, Mickelsen's Re- arrangement Morningside Minn.; Lots 1 thru 5, Wooddale
Heights 2nd Addn.; Lots 1 thru 26, Blk. 1, Lots 1 thru 26, Blk. 2, and Lots 8
thru 19, Blk. 3, Crocker & Crowell's First Addn.; Lots 1 & 2, Blk. 1, Morine's
Addn.; and Lots 14 thru 78, Morningside Addn.
Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding this improve-
ment may be forwarded to -the City Council or Engineering Department prior to the
hearing or presented at the hearing itself. If you desire additional informa-
tion, please call me at 927 -8861 between 8:00 A.M. and 4:30 P.M., Monday through
Friday.
The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close
of the hearing.
Thank you.
Francis J."Hoffman, P.E.
Director of Public Works
and City Engineer
FJH /clf
PROPOSED
ASSESSMENT
AREA 1
PROPOSED
ASSESSMENT
AREA 2
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S-47
_
Z , - -a �� CALVIN
�
CHRISTIA
��- SCHOOL
%.CQMMNfTy`Buy D T
zi
Zi
;+N9Eq
r*-r41 bT
cr
Y I
IT I _1
` u
yl o o ~
ct
I
L
L
L
Comprehensive Land Use Plan
Transportation Element
Page 17
IV. Bicycle and Pedestrian System
The demand for increased attention to facilities for bicycles and pedestrians
is expected to be strong throughout the 1980's. A variety of reasons, including
energy awareness and physical exercise,will require increased investment,
both public and private, in the City's facilities to accomodate bicycle and pedestrian
traffic.
Goal: Provide facilities for pedestrians and bicycles that serve the transportation
and recreation needs of Edina residents, and that operates without conflict with
other transportation modes.
A. Pedestrian Paths (Sidewalks)
An excellent street and highway system, and the availability of cheap gas
during the period of rapid growth in Edina,made the provision of sidewalks in new
subdivisions unnecessary_. Since that time circumstances have changed dramatically
and the demand for -_*- ^edestrian rou —c = ^d will continue to
increase during the planning period.
Sidewalks and other pedestrian paths serve two important functions: the
provision of safe lanes for recreation; and the provision of access lanes to
opportunities. By providing a system that gives pedestrian access to opportunities
(employment centers, commercial centers, parks, entertainment facilities), most
of the demand for recreation (exercise) can be satisfied.
Existing sidewalks in the City are concentrated in the Morningside and
Country Club neighborhoods where development occurred prior to 1930.. After
1930, when the private automobile began to take over for the street cars few
sidewalks were provided. Map T -7 details the existing sidewalk system in Edina.
Recently, a more general awareness of the need for a sidewalk system has
developed. The need for an improved and expanded sidewalk system in Edina
has been studied by the League of Women Voters, by a Citizens Task Force,
and by City staff. The recommendations of these studies have been synthesized in
the proposed sidewalk system shown on Map T -7.
Objective: To provide a rational system of sidewalks that will enhance pedestrian
safety, encourage non - motorized transportation and improve access to public
transit and activity centers:
Comprehensive Land Use Plan
Transportation Element
Page 18
Policies: Provide short link sidewalks that improve and connect the existing
system.
Provide sidewalks and safe crossing in high pedestrian danger
areas, including high traffic streets, and commercial areas.
areas.
Provide sidewalks for transit access.
Provide sidewalks in high density residential areas.
Provide sidewalk links within the Southdale major activity center.
Provide sidewalk links to public service centers, and recreation
Provide sidewalk access to major employment centers.
B. Bikeways.
The drive to provide safe and suitable paths for bicycles began in Edina in
the early 1-11— a 1 —nn —1 1_ity staff committees have been actively involved in
planning a system of bike paths for Edina. Early planning efforts were directed
toward providing bike paths for recreation and to provide connections to high
activity Cityparks. During the planning period demand for a wider variety of
use and access is anticipated. The system of bikeways in Edina will expand as a result
of increased demand for access to employment centers, shopping, and recreation
areas.
Although the ideal solution to providing bike paths is to provide paths that
are completely separated from public streets, it should be realized that in many
sections of the City it is not financially or physically feasible. In low density,
low traffic residential areas, the public street system and sidewalk system must
serve as the connecting link to the principal bike path system.
Objective: To provide a system of bike paths that resonds to the needs of Edina
residents for recreation and non - motorized commuting.
Policies: Complete the proposed bike path system around major activity parks,
including neighborhood links.
Yr
January 22, 1990
Ms. Marcella Daehn, City Clerk
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Ms. Daehn:
Enclosed please find seven pages of a petition requesting a
sidewalk on West 42nd Street. The petitioners are requesting,
pursuant to MN Statutes Chapter 429, that the City of Edina
install a sidewalk on West 42nd Street between France Avenue and
the City limits (Oakdale Street). There are two categories of
petitioners: owners of property along West 42nd Street, and
owners of property on side streets adjacent to West 42nd Street.
Owners of side street property will benefit directly from a
sidewalk on 42nd Street since residents of the area use 42nd
Street to walk to Weber Park, school bus stops, the France Avenue
MTC bus stop, and generally as a connector route.
The undersigned Ms. Guerin spoke with the City Engineer last
summer regarding the procedural steps leading a City Council
meeting on the sidewalk issue. As we understand the procedure,
your office will verify the signatures'-status as property
owners, and you will also determine the percentage of 42nd Street
property owners who have signed. We believe that more than 35%
of the owners have signed. Please note that Weber Park abuts a
large section of the street.
According to the City Engineer (Mr. Fran Hoffman), after your
office verifies the signatures, you will forward the petition to
Mr. Hoffman's office where they will do a preliminary cost
assessment. Mr. Hoffman gave a rough estimate of $1,000 per lot
if the City installs a sidewalk on both sides of the street. We
understand that residents may choose to pay any amount assessed
in up to 30 annual installments.
Since we believe that residents of the adjacent side streets will
benefit from a 42nd Street sidewalk,.we will ask the City to
assess construction costs upon both the 42nd Street property and
the side street property.
Ms. Marcella Daehn
January 22, 1990
Page 2
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 also provides that there will be
at least two City Council meetings prior to the assessment of any
sidewalk construction costs. First, after mailed a published
notice, the City Council will meet and vote on a sidewalk
resolution. The City Engineer will determine the exact cost of
the sidewalk construction. Not only will property owners have an
opportunity to review proposed assessments prior to the Council's
approval of those assessments, but the City Clerk will also mail
and publish notice of any meeting at which the Council considers
the assessments.
Mr Hoffman estimated that it would be six to eight weeks between
the time that you receive this petition and the time of the City
Council meeting to consider the sidewalk issue. Therefore, we
are assuming that the City Council will be able to consider this
issue in late February or early March.
Please contact the undersigned if you have any questions about
the petitions or if our understanding of the procedure is
incorrect. Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
, I,, -t - - ;I - � doz���
6� ;-� (: CL�
Ellen Guerin
4406 West 42nd Street
Edina, MN 55416
922 -3205
Enclosure
PC /bjc
Pat Corcoran
4109 Monterey Avenue So.
Edina, MN. 55416
926 -7634
PETITION FOR SIDEWALK
To The Edina City Council:
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, we the undersigned
hereby petition for the construction of a sidewalk on West 42nd
Street between Oakdale Street and France Avenue in the City of
Edina, and the undersigned represent that they are owners of
property which will benefit from this improvement, including but
not limited to property directly abutting West 42nd Street.
PETITION FOR SIDEWALK
To The Edina City Council:
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, we the undersigned
hereby petition for the construction of a sidewalk,on West 42nd
Street between Oakdale Street and France Avenue in the City of
Edina, and the undersigned represent that they are owners of
property which will benefit from this improvement, including but
not limited to property directly abutting West 42nd Street.
PETITION FOR SIDEWALK
To The Edina City Council:
Pursuant -to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, we the undersigned
hereby petition for the construction of a sidewalk on West 42nd
Street between Oakdale Street and France Avenue in the City of
Edina, and the undersigned represent that they are owners of
property which will benefit from this improvement, including but
not limited to property directly abutting West 42nd Street.
r
PETITION FOR SIDEWALK
To The Edina City Council:
_- Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, we the undersigned
hereby petition for the construction of a sidewalk on West 42nd
Street between Oakdale Street and France Avenue in the City of
Edina, and the undersigned represent that they are owners of
property which will benefit from this improvement, including but
not limited to property directly abutting West 42nd Street.
� I
D
PETITION FOR SIDEWALK
To The Edina City Council:.
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, we the undersigned
hereby petition for the construction of a sidewalk on West 42nd
Street between Oakdale Street and France Avenue in the City of
Edina, and the undersigned represent that they are owners of
property which will benefit from this improvement, including but
not limited to property directly abutting West 42nd Street.
0
x-20 5
�zG? PETITION FOR SIDEWALK
To The Edina City Council:
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, we the undersigned
hereby petition for the construction of a sidewalk on West 42nd
Street between Oakdale Street and France Avenue in the City of
Edina, -and the undersigned represent that they are owners of
property which will benefit from this improvement, including but
not limited to property directly abutting West 42nd Street.
tZI/ 141, AIV A,�s
Ae"
0
PETITION FOR SIDEWALK
To The Edina City Council:
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter-429, we the undersigned
hereby petition for the construction of a sidewalk on West 42nd
Street between Oakdale Street and France Avenue in the City of
Edina, and the undersigned represent that they are owners of
property which will benefit from this improvement, including but
not limited to property directly abutting West 42nd Street.
Herb Knox
4245 .Aden Drive
Edina, MN 55416
May 3, 1990
Mr. Francis J. Hoffman
Director of Public Works
City of Edina
The attached list of about 175 residents indicated their
endorsement -of the statement at the tci. ,f the first page
expressing opposition to "Sidewalk Improvement No. 47" as it
is being proposed. To the best of my knowledge, only affected
home owners signed the informal petition, with one exception -
the cd.retaker for a lady with advanced Parkinson's disease who
could not write.
Before the petition was circulated, your office. was asked to
confirm or correct the general impression that the cost of the
sidewalks installed some ten years ago was assessed entirely to
the -homes where the sidewalks were installed, and not shared by
areas where no sidewalks were put in. The answer given by the
assistant was "that is absolutely right ". Yrhen it was learned
Thursday Lfternoon that your study of the records indicated
otherwise, efforts to collect more signatures were stopped
because I was not sure I could give people accurate information
on this point.
If it turns out you are right, it should be understood that
the earlier information ,iven. by your office resulted? 4.r,
several households signing the list who otherwise would not
have done so. Also, theee households were encountered where
one spouse signed and the other disagreed.
Thank you fo.-- your attention.
Sincerely,
Herb Knox
,��•%� -, l4 =lam �_' c ��c. -.,� -c �.'w.�
_
,V
,��•%� -, l4 =lam �_' c ��c. -.,� -c �.'w.�
71-AC UZOd r—X 711CGl P L°Si'drtiYs QP )Vet # /' l pSlde
jF �
c�1'e D -PLe d �ho�cscd
Ideavalk hs ,r?rovc�i�r -t/ 1r�a. S- t)L7.4 Ll,�st �t -2mil.
Sze
,�'' � (� �.�•�- -t/� -� � --� `7 �� =off ==� -rte._.
44d
all
L .f; rr
A4Z,
� d
(� �' .�� /„ t .J`�kc � yDlO iliv rte, n S: �� 1� • ,
r
,M���-'�'- G���. -1 �`���'T -1L r;�,,v11, rti.� `�," � '► , � -: G -J4, I� ��h � -.
�, r 44
IL
.."0" ........... . .
s
fi
5-5
1
yaa� �Id� p� ,
Ald env b2
q- oho 7
A-A-
4 � I &or-� 1�
-7
IA
e7
�4 '7
st -
I ,3' -
4W-Al,l
q2 23-s C s 44
"77
qc
3
--- -4z., q & v-irr,tu
Cv
sco
A-
'do
C/o
ate
1�
E Pei ! A76 ftf
JA
Wt
MCA
•
WA,
• jol
ate
1�
g .
.. _..... -. 777
.. - G�1p_- '_..ww�e- .L_...... -.•T wwe +y+�b^+L.. . q'. c• .�ir.�M�:•Y�a.?,- '11�M- ��.F. - -. �..`�+ .�_ -.. __ .. -.._ r_.�.- ..�.��
\ 1 // LL
�"i)n�711k—, -4111 1 j), J 2 *R.St
4 2 3 1
-- _
- -1�..� - —-- -- -. —_ --
PAP
I op
7 .
ME-
_ 1 0 , AM1\ lye i
♦ i , 1 , I , , , I / /�l WNW
OEM"
I
.L
.s .! _ •�l �M4
4 2 3 1
-- _
- -1�..� - —-- -- -. —_ --
' e
April 30, 1990
Francis J. Hoffman, P.E.
Director of Public Works /City Engineer
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
To Whom It May Concern:
I shall attend the hearing, but wanted you to have in hand prior to that time
the enclosed schematic indicating our route to Weber Park, and bus stops. In
the 13 years we have lived at 4012 Kipling, we have yet to use 42nd street.for
either park access or bus access. We use the #12 bus from Excelsior Avenue,
as it runs more frequently and there are no hills to climb to get there.
Sometimes, however, we'll take the France Avenue bus home. Then, the shortest
route is through the park, north of the holding pond, though this is not
always accessible in winter, when we use 39th Street. The shortest route to
Weber Park is always through the alleyway at 41st street.
I do not dispute the desirability of having a sidewalk on 42nd street, espe-
cially in the area of the Montessori School. However, it will have little
value to me and my children /grandchildren. I do not feel we ought to be asked
to pay for something we will not use.
Thank you for informing me of the hearing. I will attend.
Cordially,
Dolores A. Dege, Ph.D.
4012 Kipling Ave.
Edina, MN 55416
919 -6268 (H)
SIDEWALK IMPROV MENT NO. S-47
PROPOSED JJ�
ASSESSMENT
AREA 1 -�
_ o i
Z 1�
CALVIN 7
CHRISTI S'C� • '`�� -x
-� = �---r .i• Yk SCHOOL F �-
��
is ,a, •'�' -
o, ;vy�9ER I
L P T
IT
PROPOSED
ASSESSMENT 7
AREA 2 e
r o
V
_ <'�' +� CALVIN
_ r-- CHRISTIAN
SCHOOL L
z a--r--�cu
ST
CC
Mill
;�'PiFtD�
I I I
_ w
J '
1
"CPNIGTE, ROAD
James F. Mewborn
4004 Kipling Avenue
Edina, MN 55416
April 30, 1990
Francis J. Hoffman, P.E.
Director of Public Works and
City Engineer
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Re: Proposed Sidewalk Improvement No. S 7.47
Dear Mr. Hoffman:
I have received your notice of a public hearing regarding
the proposed sidewalk improvement No. S -47 for West 42nd Street.
My family and I live at 4004 Kipling Avenue which is in the
extreme northern portion of the proposed assessment area 1,
approximately two blocks from West 42nd Street.
I do not oppose the request of the residents living in the
immediate vicinity of West 42nd Street to have a sidewalk
installed (and I believe I may even have signed the petition at
the request of someone who came to my door). However, I do not
feel that the residents on the upper portion of Kipling Avenue
have sufficient interest in or would be benefited by a sidewalk
on West 42nd Street to justify including them within the
assessment area. Simply put, I do not want to have to pay a
special assessment of several hundred dollars in order to provide
a sidewalk two blocks away that I would not be using.
If the residents along West 42nd Street wish to have a
sidewalk, I strongly recommend the adoption of your proposed
assessment area 2, or an even smaller assessment area.
JFM:shn
cc: Edina City Council
Very truly yours,
James F. Mewborn
V
/ - / 501 '5;; 6 .
All
71—
A 4�1
1,7 'p27
/I
I/
3c (1;,
ciJ -W c 7—
.1
A?
Ap r i 1 30
City of Edina
Engineering Dept.
Re: Proposed Sidewalks - 42nd Street
Sirs,
A question?
Why should the property owner be
responsible for the total cost of
a sidewalk on his property that will
benefit everyone? Also, I would
have the added cost of snow removal.
Thank you.
AgathA Ledin
4201 Oakdale
90
TAJ INTERNATIONAL HOTELS
BUCKINGHAM GATE. LONDON SW IE 6AF PHONE NO: (01) 834 -6655 TELEX NO: 919557 TAJJAM G
l� -2 iSt Z q i CI ("A G
c
y 1-301 wl t '>C t 11 St-
X Ck�vYl C'- C�sv�l 1CJ 1
J
J
+Y CJYY\ n•v -\,
L <,
cfL 51 -14k, 1 -ate r0 a - cl-' -(_ cu ,
rry'r
1 C: b,Q, LC,'i -1
.,
� T
;to.- �'
1�11 " Ile -f - il r-- a " al 4 � �-
Rkhard A. `Walkovets
4200 Morni side Rd
Edina, MC55416
2
le-
ol
.-
-'0"
a
J
'.�
Imo,
"'� . - /° D -S-C' V � / 14/'17 `/
at
Mayor and City
City of Edina
4601 West 50th
Edina Mn.55424.
Council
St
April 30th 1990
Dear Mr. Mayor and Council Members:
We have received a Notice of Public Hearing related to the proposed
construction of a sidewalk on 42nd St. It is underlined in the�Notice
that our property at 4021 Monterey Ave. "is among those which are
considered to be benefited by the improvement" and that we may
therefore be included in the assessment area. Maps enclosed with the
Notice show that this would be the case only if the assessment area was
taken to be the larger of two suggested possibilities. We will not be
able to attend the public hearing and we wish to register our strogest
protest about being considered for inclusion in the assessment area.
The proposed sidewalk would not benefit us at all: our children reach
the elementary school bus stop at 40th and Monterey by'walking up
Monterey, and the junior high bus stop (at 41st and Lynn) by walking
along the public right of way which follows the 41st street line. This
same easement provides us with safe pedestrian access to Weber park and
its continuation leads to the MTC bus stop on France Ave. Our
inclusion in the assessment area would be obviously unfair. The size of
the larger of the proposed assessment areas is inconsistent with this
type of project. The petitioners of this project did not canvass -in our
block.
Therefore, we expect you, as our representatives, to oppose this
project unless the assessment area be reduced to, at the most, the
smaller of the two suggested areas in the map included with the Notice.
Sincerely,
Oriol & Maureen Valls
4021 Monterey Ave
Edina 55416
9293110
r
w
Ellen Guerin
4406 West 42nd Street
Edina, MN 55416
May 2, 1990
The Honorable. Frederick S. Richards
Mayor of Edina
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Re: Sidewalk on West 42nd Street
Dear Mayor Richards:
Last week, Morningside residents received written notice of the
May 7, 1990 City Council meeting on the above - referenced issue.
We also noted that the City published notice in the Sun - Current.
We are looking forward to the May 7th meeting, at which we hope
that the City Council will approve the sidewalk. However, many
of the affected residents, while in favor of a sidewalk, would
like that sidewalk to have the following characteristics:
1. That the sidewalk be continuous on either the north or
south side of 42nd Street, rather than switching at
Grimes Avenue.
2. That the sidewalk be no wider than is necessary to allow
pedestrian, stroller, and bicycle /tricycle access (i.e.,
five feet seems too wide).
3. That no mature trees be lost as a result of the sidewalk
construction. Several of us did an unofficial count and
saw five trees that looked to be in the path of the
proposed sidewalk site on the south side of 42nd Street
between Grimes and Oakdale. In contrast, it appears that
no trees would be in the path of a sidewalk on the north
side of that segment, assuming that the sidewalk bypasses
the telephone poles.
Mayor Frederick S. Richards
May 2, 1990
Page 2
We hope that you will take these concerns into account when
approving the sidewalk plans. In addition, you should note that
since the petition was circulated, two families have moved into
houses at 4504 West 42nd Street and 4408 West 42nd Street, both
of whom are in favor of the sidewalk.
Sincerely,
Ellen Guerin
4406 West 42nd Street
EG /bjc
cc: Francis Hoffman
City Engineer
Pat Corcoran
4109 Monterey Avenue So.
� [M
-�-- s
^ �, -^ ����-ft.,� %f�.•l —_ ��'� �` ° % � c. sue. -7�— �`�(
Li
f'
% k,(-N, :-,- I ti
VIC
�e Uri C�
Mjw Naomi Neebtel
4249 Crocker Ave
Minneapolis MN 55416
-ay 3, 1990
To: Edina City Council
From: Carol A. Franzen, homeowner
4225 Grimes Ave So
Edina, Mi 55416
Due to a prior commitment to a Girl Scout swimming outing at
Southview on the evening of 14ay 7, I am unable to attend the City Council
meeting on adding sidewalk on W. 42nd Street. I wanted to express
my opinion in written form.
M-iile not lcon.ing forward to paying additional assessments, I
feel the neighborhood, and my family in particular, would benefit
form a sidewalk on w. 42nd Street. I realize that Edina has
historically had a negative attitude toward placing sidewalks in new
neighborhoods or adding them in established neighborhoods. The
Morning side area is unique in many ways, and one of them is that many
people use and value sidewalks.
I was surprised by the two proposed assessment areas in the letter
from Fran Hoffman. The sm.-,ller one would be more logical. TM home
is included on both maps. Is it possible that the map of the larEer
area was included to arouse more opposition to the project?
Also the five foot sidewalk width proposed by the City is
ridiculous. On Grimes, the sidewalk is 3 ft-10 in. wide. I would
say that a 3y?'-4ft. width is totally adequate.
Thank you for taking the time to read by letter and I hope
you will consider my views when making a decision.
Carol A. Franzen
LKI
May 2, 1990
Frances J. Hoffman, P.E.
Director.of Public Works and City Engineer
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mr. Hoffman :
Thank you for your "Notice of Public Hearing. Sidewalk. Improve-
ment No. S -47" which I received on April 28, 1990.
I will attempt to be present at the May 7 meeting, but should my
work schedule prevent me from doing so I wanted to write this
letter to state my position on the plans presented.
1. I oppose in the strongest terms the "Proposed Assessment Area 1"
Plan for Sidewalk Improvement No. S -47.
My opposition is based upon the fact that while the sidewalk
will certainly benefit those individuals on 42nd Street, it has
no benefit for those of us on Morningside or in the southern
half of the line dividing 42nd and Morningside. We have access to
Weber Field. We have accesss to bus stops.
e1'
2. I have no opposition to Proposed Assessment Area 2 since4directly
assesses those properties benefiting from the assessment. It is
most likely it was also many individuals in this area who made
the request; therefor, it is only fair they be assessed for
their request and not those of us who did not make the request
and do not not benefit.
3. For the record, I think items such as sidewalks should come from
the general city fund, and I find it offensive that residents
of Edina must be further assessed for what I consider basic
items our taxes should cover. In fact, a city such as Edina- -
which we are all proud of and choose to live in and improve- -
should have sidewalks in all of its neighborhoods via our taxes.
I certainly realize budgetary restraints prevent this from
occuring all at once; however, a 10 year plan could be developed.
We certainly find the funds to subsidize a lot of other
projects.
In summary, I am oppossed to Proposed Assessment Area 1. I do not
have any objections to Proposed Assessment Area 2 other than I
think such construction should be part of basic city services and
funded via general city funds.
Sincerely,.,
rdina, Kalachnik
Morningside Road
MN 55416
925 -4315
'934 -4100, x209
GriVne5
CITY OF EDINA
4801 WEST 50th STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
MORNINGSIDE AREA IMPROVEMENTS
IMPROVEMENT NO. P- BA -204A
T "
2 Ste. �2
010
NEW AND REPLACEMENT CONCRETE CURB AND
GUTTER AND NEW BITUMINOUS STREET SUR-
FACING AND REPLACEMENT CONCRETE SIDE-
WALK.
The Edina City Council will on Monday, March 20, 1978, at 7:00 p.m. at the
Edina City Ball. 4801 West 50th Street, hold a Public hearing on the necessity
and feasibility of constructing the improvements indicated above. Your receipt
of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you
is among those properties which are considered to be benefited by the improvements.
Total estimated costs, estimated City of Edina
participation, total
estimated
amounts to be
assessed and estimated costs per
assessable unit of the improve-
ments are as
follows:
ESTIMATED COSTS
PER
CITY OF EDINA
TO BE
ASSESSABLE
IMPROVEMENT
TOTAL PARTICIPATION
ASSESSED
UNIT
P- BA -204A
$2,625,658.57 $1, 50,856.70
$1 .87
R29.89 per
assessable ft.
The estimated costs above include construction of a state -aid street system in
Morningside on Grimes Avenue from W. 44th Street to W. 42nd Street and on W.42nd
Street from Grimes Avenue to France Avenue. This allows the City to draw state -
aid funds which can be allocated to the construction project. The test estimates
above reflect constructing a street system in Morningside with a unifonn width
of thirty (30) feet in non- sidewalk areas north of W. 42nd Street and a street
width on streets south of W. 42nd Street corresponding to the current width on
each street, with replacement of sidewalk, on existing sidewalk areas.
An alternate. cost estimate without use of state -aid funds will also be presented
at the hearing.
Other items in the cost estimates include removing elm trees on the boulevarc! and
a re- forestation Program for the boulevard trees lost. There is great concern
that dutch elm disease will afflict the remaining boulevard trees and as such,
tree removal cost estimates are included.
The City of Edina participation includes state -aid funds if a state -aid street
system is constructed, community development funds, and general funds used to
pay one -half ne cost of replacling curb and gutter, base and surfacing in the
area presently.having c!arb and getter place.
Page 2
IMPROVEMENT P- BA -204A
It is proposed to assess these improvements over a 15 to 20 year period. The
City's normal policy in assessing the cost of street and sidewalk improvements
is to assess on the basis cf a property's frontage along the street with the
frontage along the side of a corner lot divided by three to determine the
assessable footage along those street::.
If this project is approved, it is proposed to construct the street improvement
over a two year period, 1978 and 1979. Assessment for this project would be
levied in 1980 with the first payment due in 1981. The present ccndition of
the Municipal Bond market makes -it difficult to determine the annual rate of
interest that will be charged on the annual unpaid assessment balance, but it
will not exceed seven (7) percent.
Also, attached to this notice is an information sheet for property owners over
65 for whom special assessment would he a hardship.
Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding these improve-
ments may be forwarded to the City Council or Engineering Department prior to
the hearing or presented at the hearing itself. If you desire additional infor-
mation, please call me at 927 -8861 between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
Sincerely,
1.
Francis J. Hoffman
Director of Public Works.
and Engineering
FJH:cq
ti
T'
CITY OF EDINA
4801 WEST 50th STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
MORNINGSIDE AREA IMPROVEMENTS
IMPROVEMENT NO. P- ST.S. -145A
STnRr4 SFWFR
The Edina City Council will on
Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th
and feasibility of constructing
of this notice is an indication
is among those properties which
menu.
4onday, March 20, 1978, at 7:00 p.m., at the
Street, hold a Public Hearing on the necessity
the improvements indicated above. Your receipt
that property whose ownership is listed to you
are considered to be benefited by the improve-
Since the last hearing, we have re- examined the proposals for storm sewer work
and propose that a storm sewer improvement be completed prior to construction
of a permanent street surface. 'We are proposing wh t we consider to be minin"uri
storm sewer extensions on Grimes Avenue from Morniegside Road to Branson Street, _
on 1lorninaside Road from Grimes tc Crocker. Avenue; on-Crocker Avenue between
Morninaside Road and 14. 42nd Street and on Lynn Avenue from 14. 42nd Street to
LittelJStreet. The storm sewer cost is proposed to be assessed uniformly over
the total drainage area.
j' ESTIMATED COST
v CITY OF EDINA
IMPROVEMENT TOTAL PARTICIPATION
P- ST.S -145A $133,313.68 $9,316.72
PER
TO BE ASSESSABLE
ASSESSED UNIT
$123,996.96 20.74 /per
1000 sq. ft.
If this project is approved, it is proposed to construct the storm sewer during
1978. Assessment for this project will be levied in 1979 with the first payment
due in 1980. (The present condition of the Municipal Bond market makes it diffi-
cult to determine the annual rate of interest that will be charged on the annual
unpaid assessment balance, but it will not exceed seven (7) percent.)
Any inquiries, comments and ;'or suggestions you may have regarding these improve-
ments may be forwarded to the City Council or the Engineering Department prior
to the hearing or presented at the hearing itseif. If you desire additional
information., please call me at 92? -8861, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
Sincerely,
Francis J. Hoffman
Director r* Public l,:orks
and Engineering
FJH:cq
IJ
CITY OTF EDINA
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ON
WATEIC-AIN, NO. 299
Notice is hereby given that the Edina City Cowicil will meet at the City Hall at
4801 West 50th Street, Fdira, Minnesota, on August 21, 1978,, at 7:00 p.m. to hear,
consider., and pass upon all objections, both oral and written, "to a proposed
special assessment for the following, improvement:
CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAI ?d. NO. 299
Morningside Area
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows:
Lot 11, Auditor's Subdivision tt172; Lot 8, Auditor's Subdivision #319; Lot 2,
White Oaks 3rd; Parcels 1100, 200n, and 5000, Sec. 7, TV p. 28, Ran c 24; Lots
1 thru 12, Block 1, A and B Addition; Lots 1 thru 3, Block 1, and Lots 1 thru 5,
Block 2, Arden Park; Lots 3, 4, 5(also Lot 9, Block 2, Arden Park), 6 (also Lot
8, BlocK.2, Arden Park), Lots 7 thru 31, Lots 33, 35 thru 41, 43 thru 52; Auditor's
Subdivision 161; Lots 1 thru 12, Block 1, and Lots 1 thru 7, Block 2, Berkeley
Heights; Lots 1 thru 26, Block 1, and Lots 1 thru 26, Block 2, and Lots 8 thru
14, 17 thru 19, Block 3, Crocker s Crowell's First; Lots 2 thru 9, Block 1, and
Lots l thru 9, Block 2, Fairbairnes Rearrangement in Waveland & Waveland Park;
Lots 1 thru 16, Melvin Grimes Subdivision of Lets 8, 9, and 10 Grimes Homestead;
Lots 1 thru 3, Leerskovs First; Lots 1 thru 3, Block 1, Mac Gregors; Lots 1 thru
8, Block 1, and Lots 1 (also Lot 1 and 2, Wooddale Heights 2nd) thru 12, Block 2
Michelson's Rearrangement of Morningside; Lots.l thru 10, 12 and 13, Block 1,
and Lots 1 thru 19, and 22 thru 26, Block 2, and Lots 1 thru 12, Block 3, Mini -
khada Vista Third; Lots 14 thru 95, Morningside; Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, and
Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Morningside Manor; Lots 1 thru 3, and 8 thru 11, Block 1,
and Lots 1 thru 9, Block 2, and Lots 1 thru 9, Block 3, Morningside Oaks; Tract A,
Registered Land Survey #517; Tracts A thru D, Registered Land Survey 4549; Tract A,
Registered Land Survey #567; Tracts A thru E, Registered Land Survey #650; Lots
l thru 27, Riley's Subdivision of Lots 3 thru 7, 30 & 31, Grimes Homestead; Lots
1 thru 15 and 20, William Scotts; Lots 1 thru 4, Block 1, William Scotts Addition -
Peterson Replat; Blocks 13 and 15, Waveland Park; Lots 1 thru 10, Block 1, and
Lots 1 thru 7, Block 2, Wooddale Heights; Lots 1 thru 5, Wooddale Heights Second;
Lots 1, 2, 11 thru 13, 15 thru 18, 24 thru 29, Grimes Homestead.
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT - $458.65 PER ASSESSABLE CONNECTION
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT - $534.18 PER ASSESSABLE CONNECTION
The proposed assessment roll is now on file in the office of the City Clerk and
is open to public inspection. The proposed assessment will be payable in ten
(10) equal installments over a period of ten years. First payment of each
assessment will be payable together with real estate taxes payable in 1979, with
interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 5% per annum from the date of
the resolution adopting the assessment to December 31, 1979. To each subsequent
installment will be added interest at the same rate for one year on all unpaid
installments. The owner of any property assessed may pay the whole of the assess-
ment, ti•:ithout interest, to the City Treasurer on or before November 15, 1978.
140 PURT11FR STATEMIENT L•]ILL BE IS.E:UZED.
'Pioposed Special Psssessmcnt oni Watclmal'I'I No. 299'
Page 2
Any o•.:j-,a:: rav lu-hc assessment to the district court pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Scctin.,-i 429.0,21, serving notice of t1le app•al upon the Maycr or
Clerk o- th - C-it-:j- cf Edi.;,._. 41-.,..entv (,0) bays after thc, adoption of thr-
assessincnt tho C-Lu".., Council, and b filinc z. stick notice with'the district court
Within to (1011 itftcr sv_-1r%F1Ce U.17011 17.he Mlavor or Clerk.
Pursuant to Vinne7ota Statutes, the City of Edina has adopted standards and
guidelines fcr 6e:'. -rrine1
. special assessment s again -t homestead property o-,.-ned
()4� acre ol- oldar for pa-ment would be a hardshiz'. To
by persons 65 vec� ... _ - .1 -
obtain 6efe:C1!LC'11t,. must be filed with tile City Assessor's affict_- by
the. closet of busin.-t-ss on the laZt busincss day before the Cit Council meeting
set out in the first paragrap-i -of this notice. For further information, and
application forms, please call or visit the City Assessor's office.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
July 21, 1938
Florence B. Hallberg
City Clerk
CITY OF EDINA
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
ATTENTION: PROPERTY (ANERS OVER 65 FOR WHOM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT WOULD BE A HARDSHIP
SENIOR CITIZEN SPECIAL ASSESS14FNT DEFERMENTS
It is now possible for residents of Edina who are over 65 years of age and for whom
payment of special assessments against homestead property would be a hardship to
apply to have assessments deferred if they meet the following qualifications:
1. The applicant must be 65 years of age or older,
2. The applicant must own the property for which the deferment is requested,
either alone or in joint tenancy with a spouse, who also lives with the
applicant in the same property, but who need not be 65 years of age or
older,
3. The property for which deferment is requested must be classified and
taxed as homestead property by the City Assessor as of the date the
application is made, and
4. The applicant must have a "financial hardship" as defined as:
a. an income of $15,000 or less in the calendar year.prior to the year
in which the assessment will be levied (as given in the Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 290A "Property Tax Refund" application) and
b. the first year's installment of the proposed special assessment will
increase-the aggregate total of the installments of special assess-
ments against the property for which deferment is requested and pay-
able in the year of the first installment to a sum equal to more than
2% of this income.
If you wish to apply for this deferment, or have further questions, please write or
call the Assessor's Office, City Hall, 927 -8861. To obtain deferment, application
must be filed with the City Assessor's Office by the close of business on the last
business day before the City Council meeting set forth in the enclosed special
assessment hearing notice.
4211 Alden Drive
4245 Alden Drive
4247 Alden Drive
4231 Alden Drive
4225 Crocker Avenue
TELEPHONE CALLS
Opposed.
Herb Knox - opposed.
Opposed.
Opposed. If it passes, she will move.
Mr. & Mrs. Karl Sharp said do not want sidewalk
on 42nd Street.
4102 Grimes Avenue Sandy Eicher said is in favor of 42nd Street
sidewalk. Also, want walk along Grimes. She
will be at the meeting. Also wanted traffic
counts.
4011 Kipling Avenue Mrs. Rose - opposed. Was asked if she opposes
sidewalk on West 42nd St. during petition -
misleading.
4018 Kipling Avenue W. J. Anderl - opposed. Wants name off petition
was told no assessment.
4237•Lynn Avenue Conrad Razidlo said is for sidewalk, as long as
the assessment is done right.
4201 Oakdale Avenue Agatha Ledin Opposed.
4211 Scott Terrace Mary Farr said she does not want sidewalk.
4242 Scott Terrace Opposed.
4201 W. 42nd Street They are opposed but want it on the North side.
They have the large cottonwood tree.
4217 W. 42nd Street Richard King'- Opposed. Has two boulevard Elms
which would have to be removed.
PETITION OPPOSING SIDEWALK
AND ASSESSMENT
WEST 42ND STREET EDINA
We, the undersigned property owners, hereby indicate our
opposition to the proposed construction of a sidewalk along West 42nd St.,
Edina, and the assessment therefor. This sidewalk is unnecessary and
will not benefit our property.
4 tir ��
Ox A
PETITION OPPOSING SIDEWALK
s
AND ASSESSMENT
WEST 42ND STREET EDINA
We, the undersigned property owners, hereby indicate our
opposition to the proposed construction of a sidewalk along West 42nd St.,
Edina, and the assessment therefor. This sidewalk is unnecessary and
will not benefit our property.
SIGNATURE OF OWNERS ADDRESS
PETITION IN OPPOSITION
TO IMPROVEMENT NO S-47
TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL:
WE THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY 'TATE OUR OPPOSITION TO ANY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF A SIDEWALK--,'WEST 42 ND ST BETWEEN
OAKDALE ST AND FRANCE AVE IN THE CITY OF EDINA.
S- OWNER, ADDRES&
-z
aL
f 7i
jTtz
^�
PETITION IN OPPOSITION
TO IMPROVEMENT NO S-47
TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL:
WE THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY STATE OUR OPPOSITION TO ANY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF A SIDEWALK WEST 42 ND ST BETWEEN
OAKDALE ST AND FRANCE AVE IN THE CITY OF EDINA'
-------------------------- _------------------------------------ __
SAGNATURE OF OWNER ADDRESS
Yool
' -
______________»~���_�+��+"��^~.~�______^__
�
^~-------------------------------------- --------------
'
------------------ -------------
' 4L
L�,`
-- «�--------------_�/.T_' ������
^-1
PETITION IN OPPOSITION
TO IMPROVEMENT NO S-47
TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL:
WE THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY STATE OUR OPPOSITION TO ANY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF A SIDEWALK WEST 42 ND ST BETWEEN
OAKDALE ST AND FRANCE AVE IN THE CITY OF EDINA.
'SIGNATURE OF OWNER ADDRESS
--------------------------
_ _ _ _________________
- �-�___�______________��-��'
// x
_
�
'7'o/��
.2������__
. .
_ cwj_�,
L/L} / 9
�
____________
~
4�n^w
--�r-----�---------------------------------^---------------------
^~ '
___---- ____________
'
� .
PETITION lN OPPOSITION
TO IMPROVEMENT NO 9-47
TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL:
WE THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY STATE OUR OPPOSITION TO ANY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF A SIDEWALK WEST 42 NO BT BETWEEN
WAKDALE ST AND FRANCE AVE IN THE CITY OF EDINA'
'
--______________________________________________________--___�___
SIGNATURE OF OWNER ADDRESS '
_-________________________________-________ __-___
_
\
_-_______z
__________1����_�.
�
`—
PETITION IN OPPOSITION
TO IMPROVEMENT NO B-47
TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL:
WE THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY STATE OUR OPPOSITION TO ANY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF A SIDEWALK WEST 42 ND ST BETWEEN
OAKDALE ST AND FRANCE AVE IN THE CITY OF EDINA.
SIGNATURE OF OWNER
ADDRESS
-----------------------------------------------------
I IL
;&i ................................
oll
�
/ �-OL
PETITION IN OPPOSITION
TO IMPROVEMENT NO S-47
TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL:
WE THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY STATE OUR OPPOSITION TO ANY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF A SIDEWALK WEST 42 ND ST BETWEEN
OAKDALE ST AND FRANCE AVE IN THE CITY OF EDINA.
SIGNATURE OF OWNER ADDRESS
--------�-----71---
____-__
r' ---------�- ------------------------ ------
----- �_____---
-------------------------
�
J _ _- _
P_i8 _
_7D
- �
/ .
_ /J cc
/
/ |
.�
Ile-
�- it)
AGENDA ITEM III.A
vu-
V6
H`fc�
�C�°c2' ✓rte
(See a...r,e Side)
t+-x..
c�t
4 4 w �{ 2"`� st
i13p5 ._N3U4
PETITION OPPOSING SIDEWALK
AND ASSESSMENT
t WEST 42ND STREET EDINA
We, the undersigned property owners,, hereby indicate our
oppositian to the proposed construction of a sidewalk along West 42nd St.,
Edina, and the assessment therefor. This sidewalk is unnecessary and
will not benefit our property.
SIGNAURE OF OWNERS ADDRESS
--r f-.e ,,. -ZZT7 A-
v" \
01
Cn
O
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To.
Mayor & City Council)
Agenda Item # 111.B.
From.
Francis Hoffman/ j �(`
Consent
❑
City Engineer
Information Only
❑
Date.
7 May, 1990
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject.
W. 69th Street
0
To Council
Public Hearing.
Action
Fx-1
Motion
Reconstruction from
France to Xerxes
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Continue to May 21st Council Meeting.
Info/Background-
Staff has prepared plans for reconstruction of West 69th
Street from France Avenue to Xerxes Avenue. These plans
are consistent with the expansion of the Galleria block.
However, staff needs to review these plans with Southdale
Shopping Center as to access changes further prior.to any
Council action. We, therefore, recommend continuing this
matter to the May 21st, 1990 Council meeting.
A.
e F .
Iry �O
• , Z0RPow -w •
lase
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Kenneth Rosland
From: Craig Larsen
Date: May 7, 1990
Subject: Licensing Ordinance
for Commercial
Parking Lots.
Recommendation : -
Discussion.
INFO /BACKGROUND
Agenda Item #
IV.
B.
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
0
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
0
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Attached is a first draft of a.parking lot licensing ordinance. The ordinance
requires a license for lots which restrict access for whatever reason.
Key requirements of the ordinance are:
1. Formal application process including application fee.
2. Yearly operating fee for a restricted access lot.
3. Review of application by Director of Public Works.
4. Requirement for liability insurance.
S. Inspections authorized and revocation of license if Ordinance
violations are found.
6. Signage, landscaping and other performance requirements.
The ordinance closely follows the City of Minneapolis licensing ordinance. At
this point the ordinance has not been reviewed by the City Attorney. If the
Council wishes to proceed to adoption of a licensing ordinance, I would suggest
it be referred to staff and the City Attorney for necessary corrections and
revisions.
N
ORDINANCE NO. 824
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A LICENSING PROCEDURE
FOR RESTRICTED ACCESS PARKING LOTS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Definitions.
"Restricted Access Parking Lot" means a parking lot which by mechanical or
other means controls access to a privately owned parking lot structure.
"Free Parking Lot" means a parking lot for which access and egress is
unrestricted and which is operated for the benefit of persons such as, but not
limited to, employees, members, customers, patrons, clients or visitors.
"Motor Vehicle" means every vehicle which is self - propelled and not
deriving its power from overhead wires.
"Motor Vehicle Reservoir Area" means the area at the entrance of a
commercial parking lot between the property line and the line at which a ticket
or claim check is received or a fee is paid.
"Parking Lot: means any open air space with ten (10) or more parking
spaces used for the parking or storing of motor vehicles.
License Required.
No person shall own or operate or in any way offer to operate a restricted
access parking lot without first obtaining a license for that lot as provided
in this chapter.
Application for License.
Any person desiring to be licensed to own or operate a restricted access
parking lot shall file an application with the City Clerk on forms provided by
the Clerk. The application shall contain such information as the Clerk may
require, including plot plans and the street address of the applicant's
residence, the name of the owner of the lot and the name of the manager or
operator of the lot if different than the owner. No application shall be
considered completed unless plot plans have been approved by the Department of
Public Works with regards to all requirements of this ordinance.
Procedure.
Prior to the issuance of a license, the Director of Public Works shall
determine if the parking lot complies with all the provisions of this chapter,
other applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, and state statutes and
regulations. If all such provisions are met and proper application has been
made, the Fire and Police may grant the license.
License Fee.
There shall be an original license fee of $500.00 for all restricted
access parking lots, payable with the original application. Thereafter, annual
license fees shall be:
0 -50 spaces $100.00
51 -100 spaces $150.00
101 -200 spaces $250.00
Over 200 spaces $400.00
Expiration Date.
All restricted access parking lot licenses issued under this chapter shall
expire on September 1st of each year.
Transfer of Licenses.
No license issued under this chapter shall be transferable except upon
application in the same manner as for a new lot, and approved by the City
Council.
Insurance Required.
Each applicant for a license under this chapter at all times shall keep in
full force and effect a public liability insurance policy written by an
insurance company authorized to do business in this state, in the following
amounts: Not less than five thousand dollars ($5,000) property damage;
twenty -five thousand dollars ($25,000) for injury or death of one person; and
fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) for each occurrence. A copy of the policy or
certificate of insurance shall be filed with the City Clerk. The policy or
certificate shall contain an endorsement as provided by section of this Code of
Ordinances. No cancellation of any insurance policy shall be valid except upon
thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City Clerk.
Revocation Suspension, Refusal to Renew.
A license granted under this chapter may be revoked, suspended or not
renewed by the City Council for good cause. Violations of any of the terms of
this chapter shall be cause for revocation, suspension, or refusal to renew a
license.
Inspections Required: Notice, Correction of Violations.
(a) At such times as de,
shall inspect every
event a parking lot
provisions pursuant
personally upon the
residential address
timed necessary, the Department of Public Works
parking lot located within the City. In the
is found not in compliance with any of the
to this chapter a written notice shall be served
licensee of such parking lot or by mail at the
as appearing on the license application.
(b) The written notice shall describe the violation and shall be signed
by the Director of Public Works. The notice shall require the
licensee to correct the listed violations within thirty (30) days
after date of service of such notice or to show cause why such
license should not be revoked at the next meeting of the appropriate
City Council committee following the thirty (30) day period. The
notice shall contain a return to be signed by the server thereof
attesting the manner in which the notice was served.
Paying Required.
(a) The ground floor space of all parking lots shall be surfaced with
concrete of either the cement of asphalt type.
(b) The ground or floor surface of all parking lots shall be maintained
so as to provide a smooth, level surface for parking and shall be
kept free of depressions, cracks, gaps, holes, and similar surface
aberrations, as well as dust, rocks, dirt and other debris.
Driveways.
All driveway locations, the width of driveways, location of self- service
ticket vendors, location of attendant buildings and the interior circulation
systems shall be approved by the Department of Public Works.
Drainage.
All parking lots shall be constructed with a drainage system adequate to
prevent the free flow of water into the sidewalk or into properties adjacent to
the parking lot.
Motor Vehicle Reservoir.
A commercial parking lot shall have a motor vehicle reservoir area at each
entrance. The motor vehicle reservoir area for a restricted access parking lot
with a vehicle capacity of fifty (50) or less motor vehicles shall have at
least three (3) eight and one half (8 1/2) foot by twenty (20) foot spaces.
The motor vehicle reservoir area shall be conspicuously outlined with pavement
paint and shall not be used for the parking or storage of motor vehicles.
Placement of Cars.
No car shall be parked in a manner which blocks any fire escape or exit
door of any building adjoining the parking lot. In no case shall cars be
parked in a manner that would prevent reclamation of any car upon request. At
no time shall any driver with a current claim check be refused the opportunity
to obtain his car, provided the driver has paid accumulated parking charges.
Claim Check.
When a car is left for parking in an attended Class "A" commercial parking
lot, the driver shall be furnished with a claim check on which shall be printed
the full name of the operator and the address of the parking lot.
Parking Spaces and Aisles.
All parking lots shall have conspicuously marked spaces which shall open
directly upon an aisle of such width and design as approved by the City
Engineer.
Landscaping, Fencing, and Bumper Curbs.
(a) All parking lots shall be landscaped. The landscaping requirement
shall be pursuant to Zoning Ordinance regulations.
Attendant Buildings.
Attendant buildings shall be accessible to all _reservoir areas and located
no closer than feet from the sidewalk adjacent to any entrance to any
entrance or exit. Minimum standards for the materials and general design of
attendant buildings shall be as- follows:
(a) Attendant building shall have a minimum floor area sufficient to
accommodate the normally complement of station operating personnel.
The building shall be enclosed and weathertight. It shall be
equipped with an operable and lockable door and window. It shall be
set on a curb or platform rising a minimum of six (6) inches above
the adjacent lot paving. Service connections.shall be in accordance
with this Code.
(b) Materials of construction shall be compatible with the screening
design and should respect the character of the surrounding
neighborhood. Materials used in construction shall be of a permanent
nature such as brick, stone, concrete, wood, terra - cotta, prefinished
metal, tile and other similar materials.
(c) All building plans shall be submitted to the Department of
Inspections for approval so as to insure their compliance with all
building codes. A building permit shall be required for
construction of said building.
Lighting.
Parking lots which are equipped with lights shall have such lights
arranged in a manner so that residential structures shall be shielded from
direct rays of light and so as not to exceed an intensity of illumination
greater than three (3) footcandles measured at the residence district boundary,
or ten (10) footcandles measures at the contiguous street right -of -way line.
(a) Every Restricted Access Parking Lot license shall maintain
information signs on the parking lot. Said signs shall show the name
and telephone number of licensee or attendant, the licensee's number
under which he is operating, and the rates charged for parking or
storing automobiles on said premises. Such signs shall state the
minimum rate, the maximum rate for 12 hours and the maximum rate for
24 hours, and if there is no maximum rate, the sign shall so
indicate. No change in the posted rates shall be effective until
notice of such change has
been given not less than 24 hours prior to the effective time of the
change in schedule by posting the same on the premises. Signs shall
be two feet by three feet, permanently mounted with a minimum height
to the bottom of sign of four feet and a maximum height to top of
sign of eight feet, and shall conform to all City codes regarding
erection and construction. Layout of sign graphics shall be
according the the approved prototypes as approved by the City Council
on file with the Department of Inspections which establishes the
standards pertaining to size of sign, color, size of lettering,
placement of information and identification symbols. In no case
shall any letters or numerals be less than two inches in height.
(b) Signs on one -way streets need only display required graphics on the
side facing traffic flow. In such cases the opposite face shall be
painted white.
(c) Except as permitted in this section, it' shall be unlawful to attach
signs to or display graphics of any type on licensed attendant
building except to attach or incorporate into the building design a
sign which specifies the hours of attendant duty, the location of
keys after attendant house, the name and phone number of licensee,
and any other information essential to the normal operation of the
lot.
(d) All parking lots which engage in towing of unauthorized vehicles
shall post such practice on a sign at each lot entrance, or on an
information sign, or on the outside of an attendant building. In
addition, the sign shall include the lots owner's name, license or
permit number, name and telephone number of tower used. Letters on
such signs shall be at least one (1) inch in height.
Charges Limited to Those On Sign, Maximum Lost Ticket Charge.
No parking lot shall charge any greater sum for parking a motor vehicle
than is provided for on the entrance signs. No parking lot shall charge a lost
ticket charge greater than the maximum rate for each 24 hour period in which a
car was actually parked in the lot.
Alterations. `
It shall be unlawful for any parking lot operator to make any alterations
in the approved plot plan layout pertaining to entrance and exit location;
width and grade; design and location of attendant building; landscaping area or
screening; location of signs; location of lighting; without first securing the
approval of the Department of Public Work.
Maintenance.
No licensee, or other person in charge of any parking lot shall place upon
the street, alley, curb, sidewalk or boulevard, any accumulations of snow, ice,
dirt, rubbish or other dangerous or unwholesome substances or of any water or
waste by reasons of washing or cleaning or automobiles; and each licensee shall
at all times keep all driveways leading to said parking lot and sidewalks and
backyards adjacent to said parking lot free and clear of all accumulations of
show, ice, dirt, weeds, rubbish, or other dangerous or unwholesome substances.
All snow originating in entrances or upon the lot itself shall be hauled away
at the lot owner's or operator's expense or placed well back on private
property. Each licensee shall at all times keep all surface areas of said
parking lot free and clear of all accumulations of dirt, weeds, rubbish, or
other dangerous or unwholesome substances. Attendant buildings, landscaping,
fences, walls, planters, and shrubbery shall be kept clean and in good
condition at all times. Trees, plants, and grass shall be well tended and
shall be replaced without delay if damaged, diseased, or dead. All surfaces
required to be paved shall be maintained with a smooth level surface and shall
be „kept free to depressions, cracks, gaps,'holes, or similar surface
aberrations.
Unauthorized Use of Vehicles.
No parking lot personnel shall use or permit the. use of any motor vehicle
left for parking for any purpose whatsoever unless authorized in writing by the
owner or operator of such vehicle.
Transferring Vehicle to Another Lot.
No parking lot personnel shall transfer any vehicle to another parking lot
without the consent of the owner or person in charge of said vehicle unless
such vehicle is parking without permission or payment.
Reports to Police.
Each licensee shall immediately report to the Police Department the
license number and make of the motor vehicle parking in the lot for a period
longer than 48 hours after the termination of the parking agreement. no
vehicle shall be reported more than once on any consecutive stay. Every
licensee shall notify the Police Department within 24 hours of any claim made
by reason of any loss of theft occurring upon the licensed premises.
Prohibited Acts.
(a) The licensee of a parking lot shall not permit the repairing except
in an emergency, dismantling or wrecking of any motor vehicle or the storage of
any junk motor vehicle on the parking lot.
(b) No person shall charge, or offer'to charge, a fee for parking on any
property other than a properly licensed commercial parking lot.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Published in the, Edina Sun - Current on
/s/ FREDERICK S. RICHARDS
Mayor
ATTEST:
/s/ MARCELLA M. DAEHN
City Clerk
vA.
ot e P
>4
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Kenneth Rosland
From: Craig Larsen
Date: May 5, 1990
Subject: LD -90 -5 , Lots 11,12
and 13, Country Club
Fairway Addition
Agenda Item # iv. c.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
0
To Council
Action ❑
Motion
0
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation: Approval of Lot Division subject to:
1. Lot width variance for vacant parcel;
2. Removal of existing driveway and construction of new two car garage for existing
dwelling.
INFO /BACKGROUND
The proposed lot division comes as a result of
variance hearing. A variance request was made
lot which along with two adjacent 50 foot lots
site. The proposed lot division would provide
existing dwelling and a 70 foot wide lot for a
below the minimum width of 75 feet development
lot width variance.
suggestions made at a recent
to build on a vacant 50 foot wide
is developed as a single home
an 80 foot wide lot for the
new home. Since the new lot is
of the lot would be subject to a
Attached to this report is the proposed footprint of the new home. The graphic
is provided for information only. If the lot division is approved by the
Council the Board of Appeals will consider the variance at its May 17, meeting.
Lot divisions are not considered public hearings and, as such, no publication or
mailed notices are required. However, since the lot division and variance would
result in the construction of a new dwelling we have mailed notice of the lot
division hearing to all neighbors who received notice of the variance request.
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the variance, subject to the
conditions mentioned above, at its May 2, 1990, meeting.
DRAFT MINUTES P. C. MEETING MAY 2, 1990
LD -90 -5 Paul Curran and Patricia Curran
4209 County Club Road
Lots 11 -13, Block 14
Country Club District Fairway
Request: A proposal to divide the middle lot of three 50 foot wide
platted lot's currently held in common ownership. The
resulting parcels will measure 80 feet and 70 feet wide
respectively.
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the subject property currently is comprised
of three 50' X 135' platted lots. The single family home known as 4209 Country
Club Road is built on the most westerly lot (Lot 13) and a portion of the middle
lot (lot 12). The remaining portion of lot 12 is occupied by the driveway for
the home. Lot 11, the easterly lot, has on it an old tennis court.
Mr. Larsen explained that on March 15, 1990, the proponents sought lot width and
lot area variances from the Board of Appeals and Adjustments,in order to build a
new home in place of the tennis court on Lot 11. The Board of Appeals reviewed
the request and heard testimony from neighbors. At the Board of Appeals Meeting
the Board noted that they were not comfortable with a constructing a home on a
50 foot lot. The Board suggested that the proponent seek ways of increasing the
width and area of the lot.
Mr. Larsen pointed out,the current request proposes that the easterly 20 feet of
Lot 12 be combined with Lot 11. The result is a 70' X 136' parcel with an area
of 9,400 square feet. The remaining parcel on which the existing home will
remain will include the westerly 30' of Lot 12 and all of Lot 13. The parcel
will measure 80' X 135' with an area of 10,800 square feet.
Continuing, Mr. Larsen reported that along Country Club Road between Wooddale
and Bruce five other homes face Country Club Road besides the parcels in
question. The widths of these lots are as follows: 100', 70', 80', 100', and
97'. North of the subject property the lots on-Drexel and Casco are 50' and 60'
wide lots.
Mr. Larsen concluded that the lot division as proposed creates two parcels
similar in size and character to those in the area. Staff recommends approval
of the request with the following conditions:
1. Maintenance of a two car garage with the existing house and driveway
easements as necessary.
2. Lot width variance approval for the easterly parcel.
The proponent, Mr. Curran was present.
Chairman G. Johnson explained to the Board that he, Helen McClelland, and Geof
Workinger were members present at the Board of Appeals Meeting that asked the
Currans to work with Mrs. Vennum to create a lot that is compatible in size with
the lots in the immediate neighborhood.
Mr. Curran told the Commission at the request of the Board he worked with Mrs.
Vennum and came up with the present solution he hopes will be favorable to the
Commission. He added it is proposed that Mrs. Vennum's tuck - under /below grade
garage will be filled in, the present driveway removed and a new two car
detached garage constructed in the rear, of the property. Mr. Curran said the
driveways for the Vennum property and the proposed property will be located on
the east side.
Commissioner Ingwalson asked.Mr. Larsen to clarify for him the need for the
variance if the lot division is approved. Mr. Larsen explained that if the
proposed lot division is approved this evening, a lot width variance will still
be needed because of our Zoning Ordinance. Our Zoning Ordinance requires that
all lots have -a minimum lot width of 75 feet. Mr. Larsen said he can understand
confusion, because a majority of lots within the Country Club area are below the
75 foot lot width requirement. Continuing, Mr. Larsen said if approved, the
Currans would be applying for a five foot lot width variance. Mr. Larsen
pointed out this process also affords staff and board members control over what
is constructed.
Commissioner McClelland commented that the plan as it has been presented
followed the boards suggestion to increase the lot size from the previous
proposal, which was to develop on a 50 foot lot. Commissioner McClelland added
this proposal works much better, and in her opinion, the Vennum property will be
improved with the tuck under garage filled in. She added at times that garage
has had water run -off problems.
Commissioner Hale asked if the proposed new house would have a two car garage
constructed in the rear. Mr. Curran answered that is correct, the new lot will
have the garage constructed in the rear.
Commissioner L. Johnson said he wants to make sure each property is developed
with a separate garage, separate driveway and that Mr. Vennum's tuck under
garage is eliminated. Mr. Larsen said that issue could also be solved by the
variance board when the variance request is heard.
Chairman G. Johnson suggested that if this proposal is approved, the lot width
variance should be heard by the Board that heard this issue previously.
Commissioner L. Johnson moved to recommend approval of the lot division subject
to staff conditions and the further recommendation that Tract A be developed
with a separate two car garage located in the rear, with a separate driveway and
that the present tuck under garage be eliminated and properly filled, and Tract
B be developed with a separate two car garage and separate driveway.
Commissioner Hale seconded the motion. Ayes; Hale, Faust, L. Johnson,
McClelland, Runyan, Palmer, Ingwalson, Byron, G. Johnson. Nays; Workinger.
Commissioner Workinger explained he voted Nay because he felt the motion was
too restrictive and the garage /driveway issues could be addressed and implemented
on the Board level.
•I•gAIN d [•l ILI M ;T, I.r
� a �� �9 "rte"
Isis
MEN ion
as
� ss�ME Mrs w
�iit��s�w NOW;
I 'I • a 111
® IC MW
to SWIMMP
gamma
IRS
-'s �' ►sty,. _99'"�I4�'��i�`'��
•- �.- � �raM ��� ��ses
mom
EDINA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
MAY 2, 1990
LD -90 -5 Paul Curran and Patricia Curran
4209 County Club Road
Lots 11 -13, Block 14
Country .Club District Fairway
Request: A proposal to divide the middle lot of three 50 foot wide
platted lots currently held in common ownership. The
resulting parcels will measure 80 feet and 70 feet wide
respectively.
The subject property currently is comprised of three 50' X 135' platted lots.
The single family home known as 4209 Country Club Road is built on the most
westerly lot (Lot 13) and a portion of the middle lot (lot 12). The remaining
portion of lot 12 is occupied by the driveway for the home. Lot 11, the
easterly lot, has on it an old.tennis court:
On March 15, 1990, the proponents sought lot width and lot area variances from
the Board of Appeals and Adjustments in order to build a new home in place of
the tennis court on Lot 11. The Board of Appeals reviewed the request and heard
testimony from neighbors. The attached Board of Appeals minutes reflect that
the Board was not comfortable with a home on a 50 foot lot. The Board suggested
that the proponent seek ways of increasing the width and area of the lot.
The current request proposes that the easterly 20 feet of Lot 12 be combined
with Lot 11. The result is a 70' X 136' parcel with an area of 9,400 square
feet. The remaining parcel on which the existing home will remain will include
the westerly 30' of Lot 12 and all of Lot 13. The parcel will measure 80' X
135' with an area of 10,800 square feet.
Along Country Club Road between Wooddale and Bruce five other homes face Country
Club Road besides the parcels in question. The widths of these lots are as
follows: 100', 70', 80', 100', and 97'. North of the subject property the lots
on Drexel and Casco are 50' and 60' wide lots.
Recommendation:
The lot division as proposed creates two parcels similar in size and character
to those in the area. Staff recommends approval of the request with the
following conditions:
1. Maintenance of a two car garage with the existing house and driveway
easements as necessary.
2. Lot width variance approval for the easterly parcel.
�NrlinG •
C 'WAIk.
�►: ?9.86 —
�2, y 26 L =56.50 Plat
stow
1
Bak �•.:`
� a
N'r
192.9 I {819•° r<'(
b
1 V �
N N V E x i s t n 9/
1� Si°ry Haase C N so ,
Teti je+J.l
t t14.�. • 14.0
N %g o $S / t
4 u ♦ : 6 66.4 !.JS re��`' coo,' TRACT B
M o.3 19.2 `° �P� e� +►\ .9 �ap,a AREA t 9,490 54. FT. pit
0.� M
x•l1.1
c �
o � "
TRACT A
AREA : 10A sv. Ft.
M __}^^•
te9.o
•
��4 • 1
p °tip I Yse9 e c
q _ 80.16
Oil
B -90 -11 Mr. and Mrs. Paul J. Curran
East 50 feet of 4209 Country Club Road
Lot 11 - 13, Block 14
Country Club Fairway Section
Zoning: R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District
Request: A 25 foot lot width variance and a 2194 square foot lot
area variance to build a new home on a 50' % 136' lot held
in common with two other 50' lots, all currently known as
4209 Country Club Road
Mr. Dommer informed the Board the subject property is an existing 50 foot wide
platted lot. Currently, the lot is owned together with two other 50 foot lots.
Along the block at the subject site the lots are platted at 50 feet in width,
however, all owners on the south side of Country Club Road in this block own
portions of two or more lots. Lot widths range between 70 feet and 150 feet.
Mr. Dommer explained on the north side of Country Club Road in this block are
corner lots. The frontage along Country Club Road of these corner lots is at
least 100 feet. Beyond these corner lots to the north the district is developed
with 50' - 60' wide lots. The lot size requirements applicable to this area is
a minimum 9000 square foot lot area and a minimum lot width of 75 feet. Mr.
Dommer added the subject property is 6806 square feet in area and 50 feet wide.
Mr. Dommer told the Board the proponents desire to build a new home on the lot.
Currently an old tennis court occupies the site. Architecturally the new home
is proposed to be similar in character to the surrounding area. Driveway access
to the property will be from Country Club Road along the neighbors driveway to
the east and lead to a detached two car garage. The proposed home and garage
are at the maximum lot coverage limit.
Mr. Dommer pointed out the City of Edina has permitted new construction on
substandard lots when the following conditions are met: other substandard lots
in the area are built on; the proposed dwelling meets all applicable size and
setback requirements; the proposed construction does not negatively impact
adjoining properties; and, access to the site is adequate.
Mr. Dommer concluded as presented, the proposal has been designed to address the
above criteria. Despite the sensitive design, staff has identified the
following deficiencies:
1. . Conformance with area. Staff defines the area for comparison as
the streetscape along Country Club Road. Spacing along the north
and south of Country Club Road is relatively generous. The proposed
home disrupts this streetscape to a degree.
2. Impact on adjoining properties. The impact on the adjoining
properties is difficult to predict. In this instance, the adjoining
properties have enjoyed the undeveloped land for many years, and
therefore, the building of a new home, even if the lot were con-
forming would impact the neighbors. Because the lot is not con-
forming, the spacing and open space would be less than it otherwise
might be. The impact therefore would be greater than a conforming
situation.
3. Adequate access. Entering from Country Club Road is certainly
appropriate. In this case, however, neighboring driveways are
on both sides of the property. Because of the narrow lot access to
a detached garage must run adjacent to the neighbors drive and
essentially be a shared driveway.
Staff believes there are some positive elements to the proposal. Unfortunately,
given the above deficiencies, staff cannot support the request. Mr. Dommer
added should the Board feel otherwise, staff would recommend that any approval
be made contingent on review and comment by the Heritage Preservation Board
regarding the final building plans. This will ensure preservation of the
character of the Baird House which is located south of the subject property.
The proponents, Mr. and Mrs..Curran, their architect, Mr. Bartels, of BRW and
interested neighbors were present.
With graphics, Mr. Bartels explained to the Board the house was designed to
blend into the neighborhood and maintain the character and symmetry of the
surrounding homes. Mr. Bartels told the Board the house has been designed to
meet the intent of the codes. Continuing, Mr. Bartels said the house has been
developed according to the guidelines for a 50 foot lot. He said the house will
be 2,800 square feet and the materials will be brick with other materials
befitting the neighborhood. He added the house will be constructed with today's
needs in mind so no future additions to the home would be necessary. Mr.
Bartels pointed out the current home on the site, the Vennum home, and the
property it sits on, is in a sense, out of character for the neighborhood.
Mrs. McClelland asked Mr. Bartels if he knew how many feet there is between the
lot line of the proposed lot and the addition of the other home. Mr. Bartels
said he is guessing that the distance is around 40 feet.
Mr. G. Johnson asked if there is going to be any separation between the two
driveways. Mrs. Bartels said there will be no separation between the driveways.
Mr. L. Johnson pointed out that the driveways could be separated.
Mr. Johnson questioned that if there is 40 feet between the houses on the west
side why isn't the new lot line shifted toward the west. Mr. Bartels said the
reason is because of the shared recessed driveway. Mr. Bartels said that
visually from the street there will be a wide separation because of this
driveway.
Mrs. McClelland said she feels this proposal is not appropriate. She pointed
out there is additional room because of the size of the lot to creatively place
the proposed structure without.such a negative impact to the surrounding
neighbors. Mrs. McClelland concluded that she cannot support the proposal as
presented when there are other alternatives that can be studied.
Mrs. Amondt, 4203 Country Club Road told the Board she has no objection to the
style of the home but wants it constructed on a lot larger than 50 feet in
width. She said the neighborhood in question contains lots that are larger than
50 feet and added she feels there is room for creativity of house in placement
in this area. Mrs. Amondt pointed out she has a fear that there could be
another home placed on the site if a 50 foot wide lot is approved by this Board.
Mr. Newhall, Mrs. Vennum's brother, 1904 James Avenue South, told the Board he
is in favor of granting this variance. He added the 50 foot requirement is
adequate. He pointed out the additional house will not give the block a
"crowded" look and added he feels the plans presented will give the neighborhood
an opportunity to have an appropriate house constructed on the site.
Ms. Elizabeth Johnson, 4215 Country Club Road, said she opposes the current plan
because most of the houses along the street are larger than the house proposed,
she added she has a concern about possible additions to the home. Ms. Johnson
also expressed concern over the rest of the remaining property as time goes on.
She does not want to see more development along Country Club Road, because it
will change the character of the streetscape.
Ms. Butler, 4634 Bruce Avenue told the Board she has a concern regarding
approving the development of a 50 foot lot and the implications of a possible
precedent being set.
Mr. Jack Curtis, 4400 West 50th Street (Baird House), told the Board this issue
could be resolved if the Vennums would wall in the underground garage, fill in
the hole, construct a new garage in the rear of the lot and properly position
the proponents garage. If that is accomplished it will be possible to get two
75 foot lots, or very close to two 75 foot lots which will create a more open
feeling. Continuing, Mr. Curtis proposed that the shared driveway could then be
placed on Vennums side with the construction fill from the Curran's construction
of their new house used to fill in the garage /driveway hole on Mrs. Vennum's
property. Mr. Curtis added this concept would make Vennums property more
desirable because she will have a new garage that will be much easier to access.
Mr. Johnson said that is not the proposal before the Board this evening, but it
is an interesting solution.- He explained to Mr.. Curtis that the Board can only
vote on what is presented.
Mr. Curran said he recently discovered the concern of the neighbors in the area
to this proposal. Mr. Curran said he is willing to buy more property so another
site could not be developed. Mr. Johnson said if additional property is
purchased it could create an irregular lot if not properly done, which the Board
would not support. Mr. Curran said Mrs. Vennum would have to be approached
regarding the suggestion made by Mr. Curtis and that he and his family would
want time think of the implications if they change their plan.
Mr. Johnson said with what he has viewed in driving by and studying the area,
the best solution to this proposal is the one suggested by Mr. Curtis. Mr.
Johnson said at this time he cannot support what is proposed.
Mrs. McClelland agreed with Mr. Johnsons observation. She added impinging on
the neighbor to the east is not being a good neighbor, when there is adequate
spacing on the other side. She pointed out obtaining more property, thereby
creating a 70 or 80 foot lot would be a reasonable, workable solution and
provide more spacing between houses. Mrs. McClelland said supporting the
proposal would set a precedent for 50 foot lots.
Mr. Newhall said what has been suggested by Mr. Curtis has merit. He added what
would the Board recommend them doing at this time.
Mr. Johnson explained to Mr. Curran and Mr. Newhall that members of this Board
have indicated that they cannot support the variance as presented. Mr. Johnson
said that if you want the Board to consider what Mr. Curtis has suggested your
request would have to be withdrawn. Mr. Johnson added that if a revision is
made to the proposal the Currans should work with staff and request that the
same Board present this evening hear the revised proposal. Mr. Johnson added
that if the proponent wishes the Board to vote this evening, and if it is
denied, you do have the right to appeal our decision to the Council.
Mr.. Curran said he would like to withdraw the proposal and work out a solution
to the problem with the Vennums and City Staff.
SITE PLAN FOR PROPOSED VARIANCE
COUNTY CLUB ROAD
:, e 7 Gaartlt.. !Mal'. _.....
d_ 19.86
1 y��6. :.�; I •II
4k I ,
".,
�a
N _
sum
-.0
Vr....'a
Eli %ii As
u w 6.6
.,
19.2 .s
TRACT
ARIA a 101 FT.
-
pV'
- -.150.24 m"67:
160-00 Pie}
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Tract H:
Lot 11, end that part of Lot 12 lying easterly of
the east 20.00 feet of said Lot 12, all in Block
1�, COVNTRY'CZUH DISTRICT FAIRWAY SECTION,
.wording to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin
County, Minnesota.
ter wart
�� SerwFar
IOtS
f
•1 - -- — . emit
T - LZ 64. 50 TV T I
i
t
I I
PFtO�..CD eWCrr.
PPwe{t CRNP�i 1 I
r ��
�Q pl
I I
�� «
2•S•f
I°3 PRoroc�D N
71p�OU 60
'�.
't
I ARIA 11464 so.rk.
H
K
lid
.I
- 1- 4-
I NI
1
'70.08
I
SITE DATA:
SITE WIDTH 70 FT.
SITE AREA 9490 SF.
BUILDING AREA 2272 SF.
SITE COVERAGE 23.9%
ro
2340 Daniels Street, Long Lok Proposed Property e, Minnesota 55356 p y D
Ph: 475-1433
.1 i
A.
o e
>4, O Cn
\ tiMRIBOBMS�O/
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Kenneth Rosland
From: Craig Larsen
Date: May 7, 1990
Subject: Massing
Recommendation:
INFO /BACKGROUND
Agenda Item # TV_ D.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
0
To Council
Action ❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
Discussion
The subject of MASSING has been reviewed in part previously in connection
with the following two issues:
1. Proposed revision of setback regulations in the Fall of 1989. The
focus of the discussion was on new construction. The Minneapolis
Builders Association provided comment on the proposal and its effects.
No action was taken.
2. Residents in the vicinity of a particular addition in the Country
Club District sought review of the addition's compliance with regulations
in January of 1990. The addition was found to be in compliance with City
regulations and policy.
Since that time, the staff was directed to review and monitor the massing
issue. The following components have been reviewed and monitored.
- Massing definition;
- Existing method of regulation;
- Massing related resident concerns;
13
- Country Club District Construction activity 1980 -1988;
- Massing related action options.
MASSING DEFINITION
The concept of massing may mean different things to different people.
Webster's Dictionary defines mass as follows:
A quantity or aggregate of matter usually of considerable size.
For the basis of the staff review and monitoring, this base definition
has been expanded as follows:
Massing refers to the mass of structures and their relation to
neighboring properties in the Single Family Dwelling Unit District.
EXISTING METHOD OF REGULATION
Massing is currently regulated with typical bulk and density standards
specified in the Zoning Ordinance no. 825. The City of Edina regulations
slightly differ from some surrounding communities in specifics, but in
general are similar'in concept and intent. They are as follows:
Building Setbacks: The City of Edina specifies the minimum distance a
building must be set back from the front lot line, the side lot lines and
the rear lot line. The minimum front yard setback is 30' or the block
average, if greater. The minimum rear yard setback is 25'. Setback
requirements differ in the following instances:
Principle v. Accessory Structures: Generally, principle structures must
maintain a greater distance from side and rear lot lines than accessory
structures in the side or rear yards;
Wide v. Narrow Lots: The minimum side yard setback for living space on
lots 75' in width or greater is ten feet whereas the minimum side yard
setback for lots less than 75' wide is 5 feet.
Taller Structures: As a building increases in height, the side yard
setback requirement also increases at a rate of 6" for every foot the
average building height exceeds 15'.
Lot Coverage Requirements: The City of Edina limits the amount of the
lot which one can cover with buildings. Lot coverage includes accessory .
structures, decks and patios. Lot coverage requirements differ in the
following instance:
Large v. Small Lots: Lots which have an area of 9000 square feet or more
may not cover more than 25% of the lot with the combined footprint of
buildings. Lots less than 9000 square feet may not occupy more than 30%
or 2,250 square feet, whichever is less. This two tier approach was
established in 1984.. Previously all lots were restricted to a 25% lot
coverage limit.
Height: The height of single family homes may not exceed 30' or two and
one half stories as measured from the front elevation. Except for
increasing the side yard setback as mentioned above, there are no height
restrictions in the side and rear yard.
MASSING REIATED RESIDENT COMMENTS
In the past year the staff has responded to comments from residents on
massing. The comments can be generally classified as follows:
1.. Current massing regulations are too permissive.
2. Current massing regulations are too restrictive.
Comments are as follows:
Too Permissive:
"The addition is too close to the side of my home / The addition is too
close to my back yard / The new home towers over our home / We have lost
our privacy because the large windows look right down on our patio / The
new addition blocks our sunlight and views / The building is not in scale
with the neighborhood / One or two such homes or' additions are o.k. but
if everyone were, allowed to build or expand in a similar way the area
would be overpowered /"
Too Restrictive:
" The existing living space is not functional for todays lifestyles / The
character of this area is urban and there is a particular attraction
about a "Georgetown" atmosphere / More homeowners desire to expand and
upgrade their homes than not. If all were permitted to expand in a
similar scale, the character would remain intact / The taxes and value of
property in Edina support large, functional homes. /"
The City of Edina also entertains an estimated 30 requests a year for
variances from the bulk and density requirements in the Single Dwelling
Unit District.
COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY 1980 -1988
The Country Club District in particular has been the focus of both sides
of the massing issue. In response, the staff has studied the building
activity in the District between 1980 and 1988. The study included all
types of permits such as interior remodeling not visible from the
exterior and the addition of new living area visible from the exterior.,
The following summary statements can be made and are supported with the
attached graphs:
1. The number of building permits of all types have fluctuated through
the study period with no apparent pattern;.
2. There were more conversions and interior remodeling than there were
new additions.
3. The value of all types of permits has increased through the study
period;
4. The number of new additions has increased through the study period
for all lots;
S. There were more new additions on lots less than 9000 square feet than
there were new additions on lots more than 9000 square feet;
6. Although the number of new additions on lots less than 9000 square
feet has increased through the study period, new additions account for a
similar percent of all permits through the study period.
7. The size of new additions has increased over the study period.
MASSING RELATED ACTION OPTIONS:
The monitoring and review process has further illustrated the complexity
of the issue. At this point the Council has at least the following
options:
1. Maintain the existing regulations and policies without further
action;
2. Open the issue for public comment in a public hearing format;
3. Solicit comment on the issue from various special interest groups;
4. Direct staff to prepare specific ordinance revisions and illustrate
their effects;
S. Direct staff to continue to monitor and review the issue.
NUMBER OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED FROM
1080 -1088 IN THE COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988
1981 1983 1985 1987
j
PERMIT BREAKDOWN BY TYPE IN THE
COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT 1980 -88
CONVERT & INTERIOR '` -70-f\
NEW: LOT>9000 'SF (20 %)
NEW: LOT<9000 SF (17 %)
LN
TOTAL VALUE IN DO]L]LARS FOR PERMITS
ISSUED 1080 -88 IN COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT
WK
we
!.se
500
c
0
0
400
IKK
w
100
x
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988
1981 1983 1985 1987
w
NUMBER OF NEW ADDITIONS FROM 1080 -1088
Is
15
10
7
A
IN THE COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988
1981 1983 1985 1987
4
Number of New Permits According t0 Lot
50
ire,,
30
20
10
ME
Size for 1980-83 and 1985-88
<9000+ >9000+
1980 -83
New Additions on Lots < 0000 Sq. Ft.
1980 -83
All Other Permits (72%
ew Additions (28 %)
0)
li
}
New Additions on ]Lots C 0000 Sq. ]fit.
1985 -1988
All Other Permits (M,
?w Additions (29 %)
V
AVERAGE AREA OF NEW ADDITIONS ON ]LOS'S
FOR 1080 -88 IN COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988
1981 1983 1985 1987
9
VARIANCE HISTORY IN THE COUNTRY
CLUB DISTRICT 1980 -1988
Total Number of Variances: 26
Number Of Variances Relative To Lot Size
Lots less than 75' Wide - 15
Lots more than 75' Wide - 11
Lots less than 9000 s.f. in area - 14
Lots more than 9000 s.f. in area - 12
Number Of Lot Coverage Variances On Lots Less Than 9000 S.F.
1980 -1983 - 4
1985 -1988 - 0
Number Of Variances By Structure Type
Garages------- - - - - -3
Garages with other structures - 2
Two story additions - - - - - - 7
All other------- - - - -14
%r A. At .
4 e
n
♦J 'sr JI;
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: CITY COUNCIL
Agenda Item # y-A
From: TED PAULFRANZ
Consent
0
Information Only
❑
Date: MAY 2, 1990
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject: PROPOSED ORDINANCE
Fx-�
To Council
NO. 613
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
0
Ordinance
Recommendation:
Adoption of new Ordinance No. 613 to update Fire Code to meet requirements
of new State Fire Code.
Info /Background:
Minnesota Statute requires local Fire Code to meet minimum provisions.
New State Code necessitates local update.
See attached analysis & overview.
C
A
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: May 2, 1990
TO: Ken Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Ted Paulfranz, Fire Chief
Steve Landry, Fire Inspector
SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT A NEW FIRE CODE ORDINANCE NO. 613
Attached is the new Fire Code Ordinance No. 613. The purpose of this new ordinance
is to update our local ordinance and bring it into line with the current State Fire
Code and Building Code Statutes.
The attached ordinance has been reviewed by Mr. Thomas Erickson and incorporates
all changes identified by Mr. Erickson's review.
The majority of this new Ordinance No. 613_ is a restatement of Ordinance 612, with
exceptions as follows: -
Section 1: (a) & (b) Adoption of the current State Fire Codes MUFC and UFC
by reference.
Section 2: (a) & (b) Identifying referenced codes to be on file
Section 3: (a) no change
(b) delete definition of corporate council
(c) no change
Section 4: no change
Section 5: no change
Section 6: no change
Section 7: (b), (c) & (d) New language requiring maintenance of existing fire
lanes by the property owner, change curb marking and identify
limits and signs.
Section 8: no change
Section 9: no change
Memo to Ken Rosland
May 2, 1990
Page 2 of 2
Section 10. Amendments to the MUFC and UFC.
(a) Article 4
(1) Editorial changes and deleting reference to assembly
occupancies.
(b) Article 10
(1) New language to require permits and fees under Ordinances
No. 645 and 171 re�--nectively for the installation of fire
protection systems.
(c) Article 11
(1) New language to identify barbecue requirements and delete
Ordinance No. 631.
Section 11: no change
Section 12: Identify ordinances repealed by this ordinance, and eliminating
some outdated and obsolete ordinances.
SUMMARY OF STATE FIRE CODE (MUFC) CHANGES
Included here are a selection of changes that have been identified as controversial
or of special interest during the code development, public hearing, and adoption
process:
1. 1982 National Fire Code (NFC) - NFPA
The NFC has been deleted by the State Fire Code unless specifically referenced
by the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code. This was done in an attempt to provide for
more uniform enforcement of this code.
2. ARTICLE 11, "General Precautions Against Fire"
The new State Fire Code has adopted a set of requirements for barbecues in
multiple dwellings in response to an increasing number of fires associated with
the operation of these devices. This language is more restrictive than
Ordinance No. 631. The problem lies in our inability to enforce requirements
less restrictive than this code.
Our option is to adopt this language or delete it and enforce nothing. Our
recommendation is to adopt the new language in State Fire Code and repeal our
current barbecue ordinance, Ordinance No. 631.
3. ARTICLE 80 Hazardous Materials
Recent Federal legislation has delegated a significant increase in the role of
the State and local jurisdictions' responsibility to handle hazardous materials
incidents. This code section gives us a uniform guide for code enforcement
that hopefully will assist us in pre - planning, inspection and code enforcement,
operations and recordkeeping based on this new Federal legislation.
TRP /SDL /ras
Attachment
ORDINANCE NO. 613
AN ORDINANCE'ADOPTING THE MINNESOTA UNIFORM FIRE
CODE AND THE NATIONAL FIRE CODE BY REFERENCE,
ESTABLISHING A BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION,
REQUIRING PERMITS, AUTHORIZING ESTABLISHMENT
OF FIRE LANES, IMPOSING A PENALTY AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 612.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Adoption of Codes and Standards. There is adopted and incorporated
herein by reference as an ordinance of the City:
(a) The Minnesota Uniform Fire Code promulgated by the Department of Public
Safety of the State of Minnes -ta, published in the State Register on May
22, 1989, and adopted as published in the State Register on September 25,
1989, (which Code is hereinafter referred to as the "MUFC ") with the
changes and omissions hereinafter set forth;
(b) The 1988 Edition of the Uniform Fire Code, as published by the
International Conference of Building Officials and the Western Fire Chiefs
Association (hereinafter referred to as "UFC "), with the changes and
omissions hereinafter set forth.
Section 2. Codes and Ordinance on File. One copy of each of the following
codes, with the changes and omissions hereinafter set forth, each marked "Official
Copy ", shall be filed in the office of the Clerk prior to publication of this
ordinance and shall remain on-file and available for use and examination by the
public:
(a) MUFC;
(b) UFC.
The Clerk shall furnish copies of said codes or standards at cost to any person
upon request. Also, additional copies of this ordinance shall be kept in the
office of the fire department.for distribution to the public.
Section 3. Definitions.
(a) Wherever the word "jurisdiction" is used in the MUFC, it shall mean the
City of Edina.
(b) Wherever the term "chief" is used in the MUFC, it shall mean the Chief of
the Edina Fire Department or his authorized representative.
Section 4. Establishment of the Bureau of Fire Prevention.
(a) The Bureau of Fire Prevention is hereby established in the Fire Department
of the City. It shall be operated under the supervision of the Chief of
the Fire Department. The members'of the Bureau of Fire Prevention shall
be the Chief of the Fire Department, an Assistant Chief of the Fire
Department and all Inspectors of the Fire Department. The Chief of the
Fire Department from time to time may appoint Inspectors of the Fire
Department.
(b) A report of the Bureau of Fire Prevention shall be made annually and
transmitted to the Manager. It shall contain all proceedings under this
ordinance with such statistics as the Chief of the Fire Department may
wish to include therein; the Chief of the Fire Department shall also
recommend any amendments to this ordinance which in his judgment shall be
desirable.
Section 5. Enforcement; Appeals. The provisions of this ordinance shall be
enforced by the Building Official and the Bureau of Fire Prevention in accordance
with Sections 3 through 10, inclusive, of Ordinance No. 471. Appeals from any
order made by the Building Official or the Bureau of Fire Prevention shall be made
in accordance with Sections 3 through 10, inclusive, of ordinance No. 471.
Section 6. Permit Fee. The fee for each permit required by this ordinance and
for each annual ,renewal thereof shall be established by Ordinance No. 171. All
permits unless otherwise noted shall expire one year from the date of issuance.
Section 7. Orders Establishing Fire Lanes.
(a) The Bureau of Fire Prevention is hereby authorized to order the
establishment of fire lanes on public or private property as may be
necessary to comply with the MUFC and in order that the travel of fire
equipment may not be interfered with and that access to fire hydrants or
buildings may not be obstructed.
(b) Fire lanes in existence prior to the effective date of this ordinance
shall be permitted to remain using their present signs so long as such
signs are maintained in good repair and condition. The first and last
sign shall mark the limits of the fire lane. If the Bureau of Fire
Prevention determines that such signs are not maintained as herein
required, it may require signing as provided in paragraph (c) of this
Section.
(c) Fire lanes established or 'existing fire lanes changed following the
effective date of this ordinance shall be marked by signs, not more than
50 feet apart, bearing the words, "NO PARKING, FIRE LANE, BY ORDER OF
FIRE CHIEF ", with the first and last sign marking the limits of the fire
lane. The signs shall have red letters and a red border on a white
background, shall be 12 inches by 18 inches in size, and shall
otherwise comply with the standards from time to time established by
the Chief for such signs.
(d) When the fire lane is on public property or public right -of -way, the sign
or signs shall be erected and maintained by the City, and when on private
property, they shall be erected by the owner at his expense within 30 days
after he has been notified of the order and thereafter shall be maintained
by the owner at his expense. After such signs are erected, no person
shall park a vehicle on or otherwise occupy or obstruct the fire lane.
(e) Whenever any member of the Bureau of Fire Prevention or a Police Officer
finds a vehicle unattended and obstructing a fire lane, such member of the
Bureau of Fire Prevention or Police Officer is hereby authorized to
provide for removal of such vehicle to the nearest convenient garage or
other place of safety outside the limits of the ,fire lane, at the expense
of the owner.
(f) Violations of this section are exempted from the provisions of Section 8
of this ordinance and instead shall be governed and enforced by Ordinance
No. 175.
Section 8. Violation. No person shall be convicted of violating this
ordinance unless he or she shall have been given notice of the violation in writing
and a reasonable time to comply.
Section 9. Penalty. Any person violating any provision of this ordinance or
of any order made pursuant hereto shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to
penalties pursuant to Ordinance No. 175.
Section 10. Amendments to the MUFC and UFC.
(a) Article 4 "Permits Required ", of UFC is included in its entirety with the
following changes:
(1) Section 4.108,1.1 of UFC is amended to read as follows: "Where a
single container or the aggregate of interconnected containers is 500
or more gallons water capacity, the installer shall.obtain a permit
and plan approval from the Chief."
(b) Article 10, "Fire Protection" of UFC as adopted by MUFC is amended as
follows:
(1) Section 10.301 of UFC as adopted by MUFC is amended by adding thereto
a new subsection (g), reading as follows: "(g) Permits for
installation of fire protection systems shall be secured as provided
for in City Ordinance No. 645, and fees established as provided for
in City Ordinance No. 171."
(c) Article 11, "General Precautions Against Fire" of UFC as adopted'by MUFC
is amended as follows:
(1) Section 11.117(a) of UFC as adopted by MUFC is amended by deleting
the phrase "when required by the Chief ".
Section 11. Interpretation. In the event of a conflict between the provisions
of the MUFC, UFC, and the Minnesota State Building Code, as adopted by the
ordinances of the City of Edina, and the provisions of this ordinance, the most
stringent provision shall apply.
Section 12. Repealer. Ordinances 612, 621 and 631 are repealed in their
entirety.
Section 13. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon
its passage and publication.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Published
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
A.
4 A
e
>1� ^� , o
v• •
RPO"' b
1886
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER
Agenda Item # K=B
From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK
Consent
�
Information Only
U
Date: MAY 3, 1990
i
Mgr. Recommends
To HRA
Subject: ORDINANCE NO. 803A -4
n
To Council
Action!
Motion
Resolution
!x I
Ordinance
Discussion
Recommendation:
First Reading of Ordinance No. 803 -A4 Relating to Community Development and
Planning Commission.
Info /Background:
Attorney Erickson has drafted the attached ordinance amendment and has provided
background information in support of the recommendation for adoption.
r
ORDINANCE NO. 803A -4
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 803
TO DELETE LIMITATION ON SERVICE BY COMMISSION
MEMBERS, TO CORRECT ORDINANCE REFERENCES,
AND TO ALLOW COUNCIL TO REPLACE ANY COMMISSION
MEMBER NOT HAVING A LEGAL RESIDENCE IN THE CITY
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 2 of Ordinance No. 803 is hereby amended to delete
therefrom the following sentence:
"However, no Commission members shall be reappointed
to the Commission if he or she has served on the
Community Development and Planning Commission for.
a cumulative period of twelve or more years (whether or
not consecutive)."
Sec. 2. References in Ordinance No. 803 to other ordinances of the City
are hereby amended and corrected as follows:
a. References to "Platting Ordinance (No. 801)" are
changed to "Platting Ordinance (No. 804) ";
b. References to "Zoning Ordinance (No. 811)" are
changed to "Zoning Ordinance (No. 825)';
C. Reference in the heading of Ordinance No. 803 to
Ordinance No. 801 is corrected to No. 802; and
d. Reference to the "Flood Plain Management
Ordinance (No. 815)" is changed to the "Flood Plain
Overlay District (Sect. 21 of Ordinance No. 825) ".
Sec. 3. The next to last sentence of Section 2 of Ordinance No. 803 is
hereby amended to read as follows:
"Commission members who discontinue legal residence
in the City-&-h—all .... t,..., atie., iiy be _ ...,, upcl i m cai
may be removed from office 4 the Mayor with the
consent of a majority-of members of the Council."
Sec. 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage
and publication.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Published:
Attest:
Clerk
-2-
Mayor
i
:r
360 PARK AVENUE
NEW TORN, NEW TORE 10022
(212)415 -0200
360 FIRST NATIONAL BANE RUILDINO
P. 0. BOX 646
I=BESTEH, MINNESOTA 66000
(607)266 -3156
610 NORTH CENTRAL LIFE TOWER
446 MINNESOTA STREET
ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA 66101
( 612) 227 -8017
315 FIRST NATIONAL RANK BVILDINO
WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 66301
(612) 476 -03rd
0 ORACECRURCB STREET
LONDON EC3V OAT, ENGLAND
-OI- 920 -3304
Mr. Craig Larsen
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55420
DOBSEY & WHITNEY
A PYiRe EW INCLMINO Pv MSWIMI CORM"WO S
2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
( 612) 340-2600
TELEX 29 -0605
TELECOPIER (612)340 -2868
THOMAS S. EMCESON
612- 340-2859
April 16, 1990
1200 FIRST INTERSTATE CENTER
401 NORTH 31- STREET
P. 0. BOX 7186
BILLINGS, MONTANA 59103
(406)252.3800
201 DAVIDSON BUILDING
8 THIRD STREET NORTH
GREAT FALLS, MONTANA 59401
(406)727 -3632
127 EAST FRONT STREET
MISSOUTA, MONTANA 59502
(406)721-6025
30 ROE LA BoETIE
75008 PARIS, FRANCE
OD -33 (1)43- 59 -13 -65
0E- 33(1)46- 62 -32 -50
Re: Ordinance No. 803A -4 (Community Development Planning
Commission)
Dear Craig:
I enclose herewith a proposed Ordinance No. 803A -4. This is a
"housekeeping" amendment to delete the limitation on service of Commission
members (consistent with the prior action of the Council on this subject), to correct
references to ordinances which have been renumbered, or were erroneous in the
first instance, and to change the sentence relative to automatic termination of
members who move from the City to a provision allowing the Council to remove
such members.
As to the last item in the amendment, as we have previously
discussed, I believe the "automatic termination provisions" could present
difficulties. For example, a member who may have been "automatically"
terminated by virtue of this language may yet, out of ignorance, appear at a
Commission meeting and vote on a controversial matter. The parties opposing the
action of the Commission could then take the position that the vote of that member
was improperly cast, and therefore the Commission action is void, at least if the
improper vote was the deciding vote on an issue.
If the enclosed meets with your approval, I presume you can make
arrangements to have it put on the Council agenda.
DORSEY & WHITNEY
April 16, 1990
Page 2
If you have any questions, please call me.
Very truly yours,
Thomas S. Erickson
TSE:jd
enclosure
cc: Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland
Ms. Marcella Daehn
f/ Y
o e t U)
0
• `N�bRroMtbJ •
lase
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER
Agenda Item #
—.c
From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK
Consent
Fx ]
Information Only
❑
Date: MAY 3, 1990
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject: ORDINANCE NO. 162A -2
❑
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
y
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
First Reading of Ordinance No. 162A -2 - To Provide That Failure to Attend
Meetings of Boards /Commissions May Result in Removal From Office.
Info /Background:
Attorney Erickson has drafted the attached ordinance and has provided
background information for the Council's consideration of the ordinance.
ORDINANCE NO. 162 -A2
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 162 TO PROVIDE
THAT FAILURE TO ATTEND REGULAR OR SPECIAL MEETINGS
QF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS MAY RESULT IN
REMOVAL FROM OFFICE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 2 of.Ordinance No. 162
is hereby amended to read as follows:
"Sec. 2. Removal. Any public member of either
the Edina Park Board, Edina Human Relations
Commission, Edina Environmental Quality
Commission, Teen Recreation Board, Building
Construction Appeals Board, Board of Appeals
and Adjustment, the Planning Commission, or
any other board or commission hereafter created
or approved by the City Council, who fails
to attend three (3) consecutive meetings thereof,
whether regular or special, or who fails to
attend any four (4) meetings, whether regular
or special, in the span of twelve consecutive
months, shah- atit- amati-eally- be- reEReved- €Fete
e € €i-ee may be removed from office by the Mayor
with the consent of a majority of the members
of the Council."
Sect. 2. This ordinance shall be in full
force and effect immediately on its passage and publication.
First Reading: 1990
Second Reading: 1990
Published in the Edina Sun on 1990.
Attest:
City Clerk
Mayor
n
ORDINANCE NO. 162 -A2
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 162 TO PROVIDE
THAT FAILURE TO ATTEND REGULAR OR SPECIAL MEETINGS
QF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS MAY RESULT IN
REMOVAL FROM OFFICE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 2 of.Ordinance No. 162
is hereby amended to read as follows:
"Sec. 2. Removal. Any public member of either
the Edina Park Board, Edina Human Relations
Commission, Edina Environmental Quality
Commission, Teen Recreation Board, Building
Construction Appeals Board, Board of Appeals
and Adjustment, the Planning Commission, or
any other board or commission hereafter created
or approved by the City Council, who fails
to attend three (3) consecutive meetings thereof,
whether regular or special, or who fails to
attend any four (4) meetings, whether regular
or special, in the span of twelve consecutive
months, shah- atit- amati-eally- be- reEReved- €Fete
e € €i-ee may be removed from office by the Mayor
with the consent of a majority of the members
of the Council."
Sect. 2. This ordinance shall be in full
force and effect immediately on its passage and publication.
First Reading: 1990
Second Reading: 1990
Published in the Edina Sun on 1990.
Attest:
City Clerk
Mayor
C�
330 PARK AVENUE
NEW TORK, NEW YORK 10022
(212)415 -9200
1330 CONNECTICUT AVENUE. N - W
WASMNOTON, D. C. 20036
(202)857 -0700
3 ORACECBUHCR STREET
LONDON RC3V OAT, ENGLAND
O1- 929 -3334
36,RUE TRONCHET
75009 PARIS, PRANCE
01- 42- 66 -59 -49
FAR EAST FINANCE CENTER
HONG KONG
852 -5- 8612555
DORSEY & WHITNEY
A P-. ERSRIp 1NCLUDINO PRO.ESS10- CORM T1ONS
2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
(612) 340-2600
TELEX 29 -0603
FAX (612) 340 -2868
THOMAS S. ERICKSON, P. A.
(612) 340 -2659
April 24, 1990
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Re: Ordinance No. 162
Dear Ken:
'340 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
ROCRESTE R, MINNESOTA 33903
(307)288 -3156
315 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 53391
(612)475 -0373
1200 FIRST INTERSTATE CENTER
BILLINGS, MONTANA 59103
(406) 252-:1800
201 DAVIDSON BUILDING
GREAT FALLS, MONTANA 59401
(406)727 -3632
127 EAST FRONT STREET
MISSOULA, MONTANA 59802
(406)721 -6025
I enclose herewith a proposed Amendment to
Ordinance No. 162 changing an automatic removal from
office to 'a permi -ssive removal from office of those
members of certain commissions and boards who fail to
attend three consecutive meetings or four meetings in
the span of twelve consecutive months. I propose this
change because of the concern I have that an automatic
removal may result in one or more people being removed
from office "automatically" but who will thereafter
continue to attend and vote out of ignorance and which
would then give rise to questions about the propriety
of the meeting and the validity of the vote. I believe
that removal by Council action will eliminate that problem.
I give this to you for placing on the Council
agenda if you wish to do so. This procedure is similar
to that suggested for the Community Development and
Planning Commission by an Ordinance Amendment proposal
sent to Craig Larsen on April 16, a copy of which letter
and proposed Ordinance were given to you.
If you have any questions please let me know.
TSE:cac
Encl.
cc (w /encl):
Marcella Daehn
Very truly yours,
Thomas S. Erickson
�1
o� e
ch
o
•'N�RPOMT�J/
iBeB
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER
Agenda Item #
v1 _A
From:
MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Date:
MAY 3, 1990
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA-
Subject:
TRAPPING AND RELATED
❑
To Council
ORDINANCE NOS. 1071 AND
1222
Action
1 I
U
Motion
❑
Resolution
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Info /Background:
As you requested, I have researched the Council Minutes on the subject of
trapping beginning with minutes of November 6, 1978 and subsequent discussion
and action by the Council.
304
11/6/78
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilman Richards.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Shaw, Van Valkenburg
Nays: None
Resolution adopted.
CABLE TELEVISION SERVICE TERRITORY-GIVEN QUALIFIED APPROVAL. Mr. Campbell pre -
sented the petition of-Northern Cablevisioa, Inc., for the .City to join St. Louis
Park, Hopkins, Richfield, Eden Prairie and Minnetonka in establishing a cable
television service territory. He explained that this cable service territory is a
requirement of the State Cable Board but that it does not take away the City's
opportunity to franchise whomever it wishes. The cable service territory is a
non - exclusive territory. Mr. Campbell emphasized that in adopting the resolution
requested by Northern Cablevision, the Council is not authorizing or awarding any
franchise to Northern Cablevision. In attendance at the meeting also were
Messrs. Robert McDonald, William Schiller-and W. D. Donaldson of the Cable TV Board.
Following discussion, Councilman Courtney offered the following resolution and
moved its adoption:,
A RESOLUTION DENOTING QUALIFIED APPROVAL OF
A PROPOSED CABLE SERVICE TERRITORY WITHIN
THE BOUNDARIES OF THE MUNICIPALITIES OF
BLOOMINGTON, EDINA, RICHFIELD, EDEN PRAIRIE,
ST. LOUIS PARK, HOPKINS AND MINNETONKA
WHEREAS, Northern Cablevision, Inc., ( "Northern "), has given notice of its intent
to propose a cable service territory ( "CST ") within the boundaries of the munici-
palities of Bloomington, Edina, Richfield, Eden Prairie, St. Louis Park, Hopkins
and Minnetonka; and
WHEREAS, such a proposal. must be submitted to the Minnesota Cable Communications
Board ( "MCCB ") for approval; and
WHEREAS, the MCCB has been charged by law with the duty of approving cable ser-
vice territories within which a franchise may be awarded and the procedures to
be followed for alteration of cable service territory boundaries; and
WHEREAS, the MCCB has adopted certain regulations relating to the processing of
proposals for the establishment of CSTs, which regulations include a provision that
the MCCB shall require and consider, among other information, resolutions from
the governing bodies of all municipalities contacted by the party or parties
proposing the CST, stating their approval or disapproval of such proposal, and a
provision that the MCCB shall consider 'a number of factors in determining ir.:;
approval or rejection of a CST; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edina does not yet have information addressing the factors
to be considered by the MCCB in the approval or rejection of a CST, and does not
now know what the effect upon the City of Edina and its citizens would be in
terms of enfranchising a cable communications system if it were included in the
proposed CST; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edina does not oppose being considered for inclusion in the
proposed CST, but desires to have complete information about all relevant factors
and criteria before being required to state its position on the merits of being,
included cr excluded; and
WHEREAS, the regulations require the City either to approve of disapprove of the
proposed CST prior to the filing of the application and the receipt of all such
factors and 'criteria and the opportunity to examine and study the same;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, that:
1. The City of Edina does not object to being considered for inclusion
within the proposed CST described above.
2. The City of Edina takes no position.at this time on the merits of its
being included in or excluded from the proposed CST.
3. The City of Edina approves of the proposed CST for the sole purpose of
fulfilling the regulations of MCCB requiring approval or disapproval, and
requests that it be permitted to participate fully as an interested party,
in any proceedings relating to the establishment of the proposed CST or
any modification thereof.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilman Shaw.
Rollcall:
Aves: Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Shaw, Van Valkenburg
Nays: None
Resolution adopted. Councilman Richards requested that a record be kept of
time spent by the staff in regard to cable television.
TRA,°PINC ORDINANCE TO BE DRAFTED. Council's attention was called to a letter from
Mrs. Bette Kent, 5913 Ewing Ave., requesting that trapping be prohibited within the
Citv and also that the sale of angel jaw leghold traps be prohibited. Mrs. Kent
introduced Mrs. Nancy Nelson, 5854 Creek Valivv Road, urged that an ordinance he
adopted which would prevent additional injury of children and household pets.
11/6/73 305
Mr. Rosland said that he agreed that the leghold trap should be banned but that
he did nor believe that the City should legislate trapping on private property.
Chief Swanson spoke of the occasional need to use live traps for beavers and
small rodents by the City. Tn response to a question of Councilman Richards,
Mrs. Nelson said that none of the local hardware stores sell the leghold
trap. Councilman Courtney's motion was seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt,
requesting that the City Attorney draft an ordinance banning the steel jawed leg -
hold trap and prohibiting trapping in the City of Edina except when deemed neces-
sary by the City.
Ayes: Courtney, Schmidt, Shaw, Van Valkenburg
Nays: Richards
Motion carried.
METROPOLITAN COUNCILMAN DIRK DE VRIES INTRODUCED. Mrs. Alison Fuhr introduced
Mr. Dirk deVries of the Metropolitan Council who was welcomed to the meeting.
HALIFAX AVENUE WELL REPAIR BID AWARDED. Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of four
bids received for repair of the Halifax Avenue well. Tabulation showed Layne
Minnesota Company low bidder at $1,900.50 without the bowl assembly and $4,075.50
with the bowl assembly. Other bids were from Kevs Well Drilling Company. Berger -
son Caswell and McCarthy Well Co. Councilman Courtnev's motion for award to recom-
mended low bidder, Layne Minnesota Company, with the decision as to whether the work
is to be done with or without the bowl assembly to be made after the pump has been
examined.
Ayes: Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Shaw, Van Valkenburg
Nays: None
Motion carried. _
SANITARY SEWER LIFT STATION EMERGENCY REPAIR BID AWARD CONFIRMED. Mr. Rosland
advised Council that.an emergency situation had developed with the sanitary sewer
lift station at 72nd and Oaklawn and that G.L. Contracting had been requested to
make the necessary repairs.. Councilman Courtney's motion was seconded by Council-
woman Schmidt confirming Mr. Hoffman's action in awarding the bid.
Ayes: Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Shaw, Van Valkenburg
_Nays: None
Motion carried.
CITY HALL WINDOW COVERING CONTINUED. As recommended by Mr. Rosland, it was generall
agreed to continue award of bids for storm coverings for City Hall windows until
further study can be made.
EDINA JUNIOR FOOTBALL LEAGUE PICTURES BID AWARDED. Mr. Rosland presented a request
for purchase of pictures of football teams for the Edina Junior Football League
with the understanding that the League will reimburse the City. Councilwoman
Schmidt's motion for award to Lee's Photography b Art, the only bidder, at
$1,298.00 was seconded by Councilman Richards.
Ayes: Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Shaw, Van Valkenburg
Nays: None
Moticn carried.
GRADER BLADES PURCHASE AUTHORIZED. Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of two bids
for 50 double bevel curved grader blades and 50 plow blades to be used as changes
are necessary during the snow plowing season. Tabulation showed Paper Calmenson
5 Co. low bidder at $5,176.00, with Borchert- Intersoll, Inc., at $6,107.00.
Councilman Courtney's motion for award to low bidder, Paper Calmenson b Co. at
$5,176.00 was seconded by Councilman Richards.
Ayes: Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Shaw, Van Valkenburg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
INTERLACHEN HILLS THIRD ADDITION CURB AND GiTTER DISCUSSED: REOVEST FOR BLACK-
TOP CURB AND OTTER DENIED. Mr. Rosland advised Council that Mr. Wallace Kenneth,
developer of Interlachen Hills Third Addition, had requested permission to
install blacktop curb and gutter, rather than the cement curb and gutter as orig-
inally agreed. Mr. Kenneth urged that he be allowed to use blacktop inasmuch as
Mr. Dunn had said that he could use either cement or blacktop, because cement is
difficult to buy and because he actually prefers the "V "' asphalt curb. Mr. Ken-
neth also said that the Developer's Agreement which he sicned did not specify
that concrete be used. In response to Mr. Kenneth's contention that he was no
notified of the improvement hearing, Councilman Richards read from the minutes
of November 21, 1977, which indicated that Mr. Kenneth had attended that meeting.
Followinc Jcngthy discussion, Councilman Shaw's motion was tivcondvd by Councilman
11/20/78 3 1
CITY NhWSI.I:TTER DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland advised that no definite arrangements
have heen 11111e with the School District as to pnblishin}; a joint newsletter. He
said that if no arranl;ements are made within the next week or two, he will recom-
mend :hat the City send out a newsletter on its own with the homestead forms.
No action was taken.
ORDINANCE NOS. 1071 AND '1222 -A1 ADOPTED Mr. Rosland presented 'Ordinance Nos.'
1071 and 1222 -A1 and explained to Ms. Nancy Nelson Carlson the intent of the ord-
inances.. Councilman Courtney then offered the following ordinances for First
Reading, with waiver of Second Reading and moved their adoption:
ORDINANCE. NO. 1071
AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING THE USE OF CERTAIN TRAPS, AND
PRESCRIBING A PENALTY
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA,_ MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Declaration: Purpose. The City Council of the City of Edina
hereby finds and declares that the use of steel -jaw, leghold traps within the
City of Edina is potentially harmful to the citizens of Edina, particularly
children, and to domesticated animals and fowl, and is unnecessarily harmful,
painful, and injurious to wild animals; that, therefore, it is the purpose of
this ordinance to promote the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens
of the City of Edina by prohibiting the use of steel - jawed, legbold traps in
the manner hereinafter set out.
Sec. 2. Definitions. As used in this ordinance:
"Trap" means a steel - jawed, leghold trap.
"Trapping" means to set, lay, prepare, or use any steel -jawed leghold trap.
Sec. 3. Trapping Prohibited. Trapping within the City of Edina is pro-
hibited.
Sec. 4. Penalty. Any person violating this ordinance shall be guilty of
a misdemeanor.
Sec. 5. This ordinance shall be ih full force and effect upon its pass-
age and publication.
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Courtney, Schmidt, Shaw, Van Valkenburg
Nays: None
Ordinance adopted.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
ORDINANCE NO. 1222 -A1
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1222
TO ALLOW TRAPPING IN PUBLIC PARKS BY
AGENTS OF THE CITY OF EDINA
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Subparagraph (b) of Sec.'8 of Ordinance No. 1222 is hereby
amended by adding thereto the following sentence:
"The prohibition in this subparagraph (b) shall not apply to trapping done
by the City of Edina, or done under its direction, or done by any other govern-
mental agency or department with the permission of the City of Edina; provided
that in no event shall steel - jawed, leghold traps be used."
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage
and publication.
Motion for adoption of the Ordinance was seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Courtney, Schmidt, Shaw, Van Valkenburg
Nays: None
Ordinance adopted. /
ATTEST:
City Clerk
/ Mayor
STATE AID HIGHWAY RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED As recommended by the City Engineer,
Councilman Courtney offered the following resolutions and moved their, adoption:
RLSOLUTION ESTARLISIU NG MUNICIPAL STATE AID HICHWAYS
WHEREAS, it appears to the City Council of the Citv_ of Edina, Minnesota, that the
streets hereinafter described should he designated Municipal State Aid Streets
under the provisions of Minnesota laws of 1959, Chapter 500;
7/21 i9
141
i_)LTi1 nt:PA"rTMF:dT CON Ti I'll ;NCF REPO ^T CO ?1MEriDED. Mayor Van VaPM1enburg commended rtrs.
Colleen Faul.us on her report on the conference .which was attended by the Health
Department.. No action was taken.
PARK DEPARTMENT COMPLIMENTED ON U.S.G.A. WOMEN'S AMATEUR PUBLIC LINKS TOURNAMENT.
Mayor Van Valkenburg publicly thanked Mr. Kojetin and all members of the Park
Department and commended them on the excellent job they had cone to make the U.S.G.A.
Women's Amateur Public Links Tournament a success. -Councilman Bredesen advised
also that the winner of the tournament had commented on the excellent condition of
the golf course. No action was taken.
PAMELA S. MILLER SUIT NOTED. Mr. Rosland advised Council that a suit had been
brought against the City by Pamela S. Miller and said that the matter had been
referred to the City Attorney and that it would be defended in Conciliation Court.
No action was taken.
LIWCON FUNDS APPLICATION APPROVED FOR BREDES_EN _PART:. As recocmmended by Mr. Hughes,
Councilwoman Schmidt offered the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the City staff be and is hereby authorized to prepare and sub-
nit an application for a LAWCON /LCe:R (Land and Water Conservation /Legislative
Commission on Minnesota Resources) grant for the development of Bredesen Park
Nature Area.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilman Bredesen.
Q Rollcall:
Q Ayes: Bredesen, Schmidt, Van Valkenburg
Q Nays: None
Resolution adopted.
ORDINANCE 1:0. 311 -Al2 ADOPTED ON SECOND READING. Councilwoman. Schmidt offered
Ordinance No. 311 -Al2 for Second Reading and craved its adoption as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 311 -Al2
AN ORDINi1NC°_ AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 311 TO ALLOW
CITY COUNCIL TO GRANT APPROVAL
FOR HARBORING MORE THAN TWO DOGS OVER SIX MONTHS OF AGE
A7 ANY PLACE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIT'! OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 17 (d) of Ordinance No. 311 is herebv amended to read
as follows:
"(d) No more than two animals over six months of age shall be kept or
harbored at any place except in a licensed pet shop or licensed animal hospital,
unless permission has been granted by the Board of Health in accordance with
Ordinance No. 302."
Sec. '_'. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage
and publication.
:Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Councilman Bredesen.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen., Schmidt, Can Valkenburg
:'aye: None
Ordinance adopted.
ATTEST
I/.
City Clerk
"favor
TRAPPING ORDINANCES GRANTED FIRST READING. Mr..Rosland presented Ordinance Nos.
1071 -A1 and '?_22 -A2 which have been proposed because traps presently allowed are
ineffective against the beavers which are causing a real nuisance in various are:cs
of the City. rayon Van Valkenburg said that he gathered List; at the ti-:a the '_ag-
aold traps were banned, concerned residents realized that some alternate actic%
might be necessary in the. case of an emergency. 'Mr. Rosland added that there is
also a problem with Sepiers chcwin^ through underground ii hti:>> cables end that
_._orts o,cld be made to find to Corbat Z ";!E: prrbla-.:. Cuunci_..oman Schmidt
then offered the followi::Q ord.inan�.es fo_ . _rs!:
013,DINA.NC7 NO. 1071-A1
AN ORDINANCE NO. 7071
TJ AL1.Cid TVAP_ 1 :!, T,Y THE CITY Oi' EDINA
AND OTHERS WITH PKi,Pf1SSION OF THE CITY P11aACER
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY .07 ED' NA, MINNESOTA, O D,1,JNS:-
Section 1. Sec. 3 ui Ord un_lnre 1071 is .,crcbv amended to read as foL-
lous:
—ii)
142
"Sec. 3. Trappitf' i'runUoited. Trapping %rithin thu City of Edi.na is
prohibited, excopt that trappiny,iri: i.e done 10y the City of Edina, or m::y be
done under its direction, or may be done by any other governuental agency or
department with the written permission of the City Manager, or may be done by
any person with a valid trapping license issued by the State of Minnesota and
with the written permission of the City Manager."
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage
and publication.
ORDINANCE NO. 1222 -A2
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1222
TO ALLOW TRAPPING IN PUBLIC PARES BY THE CITY OF EDINA,
AND OTHERS WITH PERMISSION OF THE CITY MANAGER
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. The last sentence of subparagraph (b) of Sec. 8 of Ordinance
No. 1222 is hereby amended to read as follows:
"The prohibition in this subparagraph (b) and in subparagraph (a) of this
Sec. 8 shall not apply to trapping by any means or methods done by the City of
Edina, or done under its direction, or done by any other governmental agency or
department with the written permission of the City Manager, or done by any par-
son with a valid trapping license issued by the State of Pinnesota and with the
written permission of the City Manager."
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage
and.publication.
BIDS TO BE TAKEN FOR PUBLIC ! *T -ROVE ?!EATS. As re'-ommended by Mr. Hoffman, Council-
woman Sr_hmidt offered the following resolution and movad its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVI`:G PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR PROPOSED I`!PROVE`!ENTS AND
DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
FOR PUBLIC I`IPROVE ENTS NUMBERS
SANITARY SEWER, LIFT S ATIO`-. AND FORCEMAIN LS -9
PERMANE ?:T STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE
CURB A :,D GUTTED AND STOP:I SEWER 3A -227A
SANITARY SEWER NO. SS -352 AND ?2ATERNLAIN NO. WM -336
'6E IT RESOLVED ZY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF F.DINA, MINNESOTA:
1. The plans and specifications for the proposed improvements set forth in the
following Advertisement for Bids form, heretofore prepared by the City Engineer
and now on file in the office of the City Clerk are hereby approved.
2. The Clerk shall cause to be published in the Edina Sun and Construction
Eullaton the following notice of bids for improvements:
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50TIl STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
AD\ _RTISEXIL :1 70R BIDS
SANITA Y 5EldE1 , LIFT STATION AND FORCES L-kIN LS -9
!i :L1l•:ENT STREET SURF, %CINC. WITH CONCRETE
CURT? AND GTTTER AND STORM SEWER BA -227A
SANITARY SEWER SS -352
.+ATEF'•L%I'1 NO. Wid -336
CONTRACT 79 -6, 79 -7, 79 -8 AND 79 -9
LIDS CLOSE AUGUST 3, 1979
SEALED BIDS will be received and opened in the Council Chambers in Edina City
Hall, 450; 30th Street at 11:00 a.-., August 3, 1979, and the Edina City
Council will meet ar. 7:00 p.m.. Monday, .lu;;u,r 6, 197/9, to consider said bills for
Sanitary Sewer, Lift _ration, Force :rLin, Permanent Street Surfacing with Concrete
Curb and Gutter and l :arermain. There ill be trio Separate bids and not zie(i..
The followln, :Are approxi:rate ,ua,:r.ities of thr: -ajcr ite ms
- "0VEy!:1 :7
Pumps
=, _, 5' � . I . i'. S :•.ocL' :lain
1 e!,5 f 'F. 10" ...! ... Farces Main
_ "L:;. Mannni.,;
1).0.,, . 3331 ..itunir.cu :;
'1"ROVEMENT ::1 --:—.7-A . -
7 ;IN79
14�
CROSSTOWN 'r.f.Gwiy,, rmisF L`IsCDSSIa). ',ouucil's attention was called to a letter
signed by fourteen families living on Parnell, Ryan and Virginia Avenues neat:
the Northeast gradrant of the Crosstown. Highway and Highway 100 which requested
that some action be taken to reduce the noise level in their area. The hitter
emphasized that some signers did not want a wall constructed and suggested that
the speed limit on the Crosstown Highway could be reduced to 45 miles per hour,
which action would cause many trucks to use Interstate 494. Mr. Rosland said
that lie did not think that the speed reduction would be practical but suggested
an earth berm and /or a heavy planting of spruce trees would help solve the problem.
An unidentified lady who lives on Wyman Avenue said that the noise also causes
difficulty in her neighborhood and asked if something could be done to help her
area. She was told that, because her area is higher than the highway, it would
be difficult to help in that area. Councilman Richards suggested, that the staff
contact residents to determine if they would like a berm and trees before taking
any further action.• Mr. Rosland said that he would bring the matter back for
Council's determination. No formal action was taken.
TRAPPING ORDINANCE DISCUSSED; NO ACTION TAKEN AS THIS TIME. Mr. Rosland
recalled that in November, 1978, the Council had adopted Ordinance No. 1071
which ordinance would prohibit use of steel - jawed, leghold traps within the City,
but that beavers which are causing great problems in the City and in Hopkins can-
not be captured with any other type of trap. He expressed concern about amend-
ing the ordinance but emphasized that the nuisance must be abated. Mrs. Nancy
Nelson, 5854 Creek Valley Road, said that she represented a group of people who
Q are very concerned about the- possible amendment to the ordinance and recalled
Q that Mr. David Johnson of the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources had suc-
cessfully used the Bailey live trap for over 20 years and that her group would -
be glad to buy traps for the City.or find some that could be borrowed. Mr. Bruce
Moss of St. Croix, Wisconsin offered to loan some live traps to the CLty. Mr.
James Melcowski, Director of the Dodge Nature Center, said that he would take
two traps and members of the Wild Life Nature Preserve group said that they would
take five traps. Mr. John Vadnais, Area Enforcement Officer for the Department
of Natural Resources said that he also has two Bailey traps but that he does
not believe that they will be effective. He added that it will be difficult to
eliminate an entire beaver colony. It was generally decided that the City will
work with members of the Wild Life group in the use of the Bailey trap but that
if it is not satisfactory, other action will need to L•e taken. No formal action
was taken.
TRACY AVENUE LIFT STATION REPAIR BID AWARDED. Mr. Rosland presented tabulation
of two bids for labor and appurtenances necessary to assist the Sewer Department
replace pumps at the Tracy Ave. Lift Station. Tabulation showed Horwitz Mech-
anical low bidder at $1,750.00 and G. L. Contracting, at $2,324.00. Council-
man Richards' motion was seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt for award to reco;a-
mended loci bidder, Horwitz :Mechanical for $1,750.00.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Van Valkenburg
Nays: None
:Motion carried.
INSTALLATION OF 300 LINEAL FEET OF 36" C.M.P. FOR WILLI ?_>M WAILD'r ?UL I.E: ?TS PARK EID
AWARDED. Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of two bids received for intallati.cn
of 200 lineal feet cf 36" C.2M.P. to be supplied by the City of Edina as a part of
the Storm Sewer for William Wardwell Lewis Park. Tabulation showed C.L.
Contracting, inc., lost bidder at $1,700 and Matt Bullock Contracting Co., Inc.
at $2,240.00. Councilwoman Schmidt's motion for award to recommended low bidder,
G. L. Contracting, was seconded by Councilman Pichards.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Van Valkenburg
Nays: Norse
Motion carried.
L'DEN PRAIRIE -EDINA SCHOOL DISTRICT BOUNDARY CHANGE P 20110SAL NOTED. wa.^,
advised of a M-.earing to bu held on Jul.y 31, 1979. ac 10:30 a.m. in -_-ha County
u.rd Room GovernirnnL Center -or t`a transfer o; properry i.0 3raea_tr H'iils
7, 3, 9, an,! 10th AJd_tinas fro -: Edc,:t Praici,. Indepcndeut "choo.l District. 272 Lu
Edina School uiStl:iLL 27:. ;:o action was talcen.
IN RA -CITY 311S 01'T.R4T TON SC'- TrEr,TLP. DT: ;('US::ZD. , Mi:. 11osl.an,i %al icri
atLtmiL'iou :.,, a mciaoran;ili.: from Mr. liotmint re ardio;; :,u:;sLbilit of up :r:;Li
an i.IItr;l -C1 7 but; service. The ier.;o stated that ;uol l taku apr.ru:•.Lm,italy 6i:.
months to i,:Tit•mect a f;ti.rLy_ ��li p.l,nnr.cil pro •,ei : :.1 :n::i ::L!:o called atL-rtinn ro
Lhe ^.as well n:; 1a... :,int iC 'i!..I _o: ;L itp :,r :tt -au :1y :GUO to
c700 nor wet.t: La cper :.Le v;] a- ile :4 :C :Nll , �)) •,..• Lo
224
I I., 1'ii'
Ayes: Bredesen, Courtney, Richards, S:h.•nidt, V:an ;'alkenburg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMLIITTEE MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 14, 1979, REVIEWED. Councilman
Courtney's motion accepting Section C of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of
November 14, 1979, and approving the following actions was seconded by Council -
woman Schmidt: 1) Continuance of existing signing ( "NO PARKING SUNDAYS, 7 A.M. -
1P.M.') along the North side of Olinger Blvd. from Tracy Ave. to 5900 Olinger
Blvd. until such time as residents request their removal; 2) Installation of
a STOP sign at the intersection of Timber Ridge Road and McCauley Trail; 3)
That further requests for street lighting at intersections continue to be hand-
led by the Engineering Department;. 4) Installation of NO PARKING signs for
users of the Recycling Center at 5121 Brookside Ave.; 5) That Mr. V. P. Mag-
nuson, 4909 Browndale Ave., be advised by the Engineering Department that the
Traffic Safety Committee recommends installation of a guard rail in front of his
house to keep cars from leaving the roadway and driving on the grassy right -of-
way. Motion was seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt.
Ayes: Bredesen, Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Van Valkenburg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
SERENDIPITY BEER LICENSES APPROVED. Mr. Rosland called Council's attention to
the applications of Serendipity, located in the Biltmore Motel, for an On -Sale
Beer License and an Off -Sale Beer License. The Clerk advised that she had
received a letter from Mr. and Mrs. Merrill B. Webert, 5128 William Ave., and
three telephone calls objecting to issuance of the licenses and two calls from
People indicating that they had no objections. Councilman Richards said that he
had received a call from Mr. Arthur Buffington of Villa Way, opposing the issuance
of the licenses. Councilman Bredesen's motion approving the two licenses was
seconded by Councilmay Courtney.
Ayes: Bredesen, Courtney, Van Valkenburg
Nays: Richards, Schmidt
Motion carried.
HENNEPIN E`IERGEWCY COAMUNICATIONS ORGANIZATION (HECO) 911 PLAN PARTICIPATION
APPROVED. I1_. Rosland recalled that action on the Hennepin Emergency
ci:.ta Cr- . .. Co. m
munica-
gei:ati _ . "nv-CC Dl. h _ bte^ _.^t nued f xT November 5, 1Q 79,
go
that the Council would have an opportunity for further study and advised that
participation in the plan had been recommended by Chiefs Buresh and Swanson. No
comments being heard, Councilman Courtney offered the following resolution and
moves its adoption:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 403 require that each county submit a final 911 plan
to the Department of Administration by December 15, 1979, and each county shall
have an operational 911 telephone system by December 15, 1982; and
WHEREAS, the Hennepin Emergency Communications Organization (HECO) has prepared
a final "911 Plan for Hennepin County" that has been submitted to the Hennepin
County Board r.f Commissioners; and
WHEREAS, the rules promulgated by the Department of Administration which govern
the design and operation of 911 systems in Minnesota require a certification by
the County Board that the final 911 plan meets the reeds of the safety agencies
whose services will be available by dialing 911; and
WHEREAS, representatives of the City of Edina have participated in the develop-
ment of the final "911 Plan for Hennepin County ";
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina hereby certifies that the
final "911 Plan for'Hennepin County" meets the needs of the safety agencies whose
services are available within the City of Edina; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Edina recommends that the Hennepin County
Board of Commissioners approve the final "911 Plan for Hennepin County" as sub-
mitted by HECO.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Van Valkenburg
Nsys: None,
Resolution adopted.
ROLLAND ROLL NOTICE OF CLAIM NOTED. Mr. Rosland advised Council of a claim of
Rolland Roll :1gairst the City of Edina and that the claim has been referred to
the insurance companies and the City Attorney, No action was taken.
TRAPPING ORDINANCE NOS. 1071 -A1 AND - :L^ c:?. :''LP. versa„ READINr, Rowland
recalled that on JL1 19-79, Oniinancc th!;. ! -l. and 1_222 -.12 had „received
Firs, ReaLiIn;, but that, S i __ t...... .. : :' . LhL: l;,'S ...tco:"tcd to usz l
traps to catch he :n,cr,;. I!. r. p rt ;' ti :. �n i:: ce. trc:,.•cr -i : •i and
11/ 9/7'J
225
that there is now •i pro5.len: with muskrats on Lakeview Drive as well as with
beavers in thv Pn mela Park area Of LI« City. 'Ir. Cal R. Colvin, 5920 Halifax
Ave., spokesman for Halifax Avenue residents, said that beavers have caused
the area to look like "tornado alley ", that wild life is being destroyed by the
flooding conditions and that there have been two power outages because trees
have fallen on power lines. He emphasized that the condition is dangerous for
children and requested that the City clean up the fallen trees in the area.
..-Mr. ,Ray-Buckman, 5908 Halifax Ave., said that he has seen as many as four
beavers at once and joined Mr. Colvin in urging the City to pass ordinances .
which would permit trapping to alleviate the nuisance. Speaking in opposition
to the proposed ordinances was Mrs. Nancy Nelson, 5854 Creek Valley Road, who
commended Council's past action and urged that the ordinance amendments not be
adopted. She suggested that the City continue to use live traps and that the
animals either be relocated to a zoo or that they be euthanized. Mr. James
Mulkowski, Executive Director of Dodge Nature Center, suggested that only one
licensed trapper be retained by the City, but that he could not do the work him-
self. The Mayor advised that he also shared the concern. for the animals but that
residents must have their rights protected, and that the City Manager should be
able to use his discretion as to what type of trap to use. Mrs. Nelson suggested
that the ordinance amendment should provide that the work must be done by a
licensed trapper, that only nuisance animals are to be trapped, that trapping
00 must be done for non - commercial purposes and that the pelts should be turned over
to the City or the Department of Natural Resources and not be sold. No further
discussion being heard, Councilman Bredesen then offered the following ordinance
Q for Second Reading and moved its adoption:
ORDINANCE NO. 1071 -A1
Q AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1071
Q
TO ALLOW TRAPPING BY THE CITY OF EDINA
AND OTHERS WITH PERMISSION OF THE CITY MANAGER
THE CITY COUNCIL Or THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 3 of Ordinance No. 1071 is hereby amended to read as
follows:
"Sec. 3. Trapping Prohibited. Trapping -within the City of Edina is pro-
hibited, except that trapping may be done by the City of Edina, or may be done
under its direction, or may be done by any other governmental agency or departmer
'
with. the - written permission of the City Manager, or may be done by any =erson wi:
11a appin; is . ' cd by the Eta`c cf P1i- ^ ^ ^�`a and ith .te .. tt2r.
permission of the City Manager. All trapping is to be in accordance with State
Law.
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage
and publication.
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Councilman Richards.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Van Valkenburg
hays: None, with all members expressing concern for the welf re of animals.
Ordinance adopted.
ATTEST:
yor
City Clerk
Councilman Bredesen thereupon offered Ordinance No. 1222 -A2 and moved its adoption:
ORDINANCE N0. 1222 -A2
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1222
TO ALLOW TRAPPING IN PUBLIC PARKS BY THE CITY OF EDINA,
AND OTHERS WITH PERMISSION OF THE CITY PLkNNAGER
Section i. The last sentence o> subparagraph '(b) of Sec. 8 of Ordinance.
No. 1222 is hereby amended to read as follows:
"The prohibition of this subparagraph (b) and in subparagraph (a) of
this Sec. 8 shall not apply to trapping by any means or methods done by the City
.of Edina, or done under its direction. or done by any other governmental agency
cr department :aith the written permission of the City ^1aaager, or done by any
person with a valid trapping license issued by the State of Minnesota and with
the written permission of rine City Manager. All tr2ppins: is to be in accord-
ance with State law.
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage
and publication.
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Councilman Richards.
Rollcail:
Ayes: Bredesen, Courtney, Richards, 5ch midt, Vnn 1alkenburg
%ays: None
Ordinance adapted.
a British
glomerate,
iers, Michb
srnie Hartman
er, were
,s A owner -
er the newly
hip New Can -
Page 1C.
Washington, D.C.
'Syrian officials have notified the
United States to expect the release of
another U.S. hostage by Friday, bar-
ring unforeseen circumstances and
delays of the sort that accompanied
Robert Polhill's release, an adminis-
tration source said Monday.
avid Brewster
■ rre51Qt$1 It 00011 IJ largo 1y tl. v ..... .. -,�
he's trading something for the release of hostages. Page 4A.
The source said he did not know Also yesterday, Iran's foreign minis
whether the alert involves one of the ter said that he expected a second
two Americans still held by the Is- captive to be freed in the "next few
lamic Jihad for the Liberation of Pal- days."
estine, the group that released Polhill
Sunday. Other militant Islamic However, he coupled his prediction
groups hold five other Americans. with a hint that future hostage re-
rest
ice arrested nine protesters Monday and sprayed chem-
thers after they blocked traffic near the Hennepin County
ator in downtown Minneapolis. Story on page. 1B.
Helium convicted of
2nd - degree murder
By Paul Gustafson and Joe Kimball federal ad prison escaped sentence from wand
Staff Writers .
could face additional federal charges
After five days of intense delibera-
tion, a Ramsey County jury found
Randy Lee Helium guilty of second -
degree murder and three other crimes
Monday night, but acquitted him of
first - degree murder in the shooting
death of Scott Brainard at a Roseville
bar.
Hellum, 33, faces a maximum of 40
years in prison for the convictions. In
addition, he still must serve a 27 -year Helium continued on page 9A
for that escape and weapon viola-
tions.
Jurors apparently had little trouble
returning guilty verdicts for attempt-
ed murder and assault after Helium
admitted he shot at bar manager Tim
Lyke. And Helium admitted he tried
to flee the bar by holding patron
Matthew Uzpen at gunpoint. But it
1982 — and now believed by U.S.
officials to be dead — and 400 Leba-
nese and Palestinians, including u
prominent Shiite religious leader,
who are under Israeli control.
Meanwhile, Polhill was reported by
Hostages continued on page 8A
Edina pet rule curbed
Court calls noise ordinance
By Margaret Zack
Staff Writer
An Edina ordinance that prohibits
pet owners from keeping animals
that disturb neighbors has been over-
turned by the Minnesota Court of
Appeals, which ruled it is unconstitu-
tionally vague.
In a decision to be filed today, the
court said the 1981 ordinance left
residents to guess whether their dogs'
barking disturbed others.
The appeal stemmed from a citation
given Edina resident Roger Dreher,
Who was cited last August after police
were balled twice about a barking
dog. He appealed his conviction and
$30 fine.
According to the court the first
occasion a police officer sat in his
Randy Helium
fn rl
i
I
too vague
second complaint was made two days
later and the same officer stopped
near Dreher's house and listened io
the dog bark. for 10 minutes.
The officer testified' at Dreher's trial
that the dog barked and made ''a
howling or whining -type noise." He
also said that the "frequency and
consistency were disturbing" and the
dog barked about every 10 seconds
car about 50 yards from Dreher's i
Pets continued on page 6A
house and listened to the dog bark. A ... '
esday /Apra 24/199b /Star Tribune
tge IA
impact on minorities is greatest,
use involved in the anti -drug ef-
ts agree that the system is not
isciously designed against blacks.
vas a black judge who sentenced a
ck man in Los Angeles to life
prisonment for possession of 5' /2
ms of cocaine, they point out.
wouldn't call it a conscious con -
racy," said Dr. Barry Krisberg,
�sident of the National Council on
ime and Delinquency. "I don't be-
ve that these black mayors and
lice chiefs and other officials have
out to make war on their own
ople."
ie officials say, however, that the
sponse has been rooted in the belief
at blacks are the major purveyors
I drugs in America. The news medi-
'§ stark portrayals of the drug- relat-
d violence and crime most preva-
ent in black neighborhoods has
Dlayed a significant role in that per-
ception.
Me kinds of visuals you have on
tsltvision, where most people get
'
Neil news, are shots of black people
*.a drug- market area," said Bob
Witt. tor of the Center for
blic Affairs, a Washing -
anization that analyzes
ge. "That reinforces the
it's mostly a black
flies get the additional
Mounted, residents also
e2 of increased law en-
41t grey hadn't counted
turps, searches, ar-
Mrassment. But
the police ef-
they y affect civil
more
said
Pets Continued from page lA
for 10 minutes.
Only the officer, not the complaining
neighbors, was called to testify at
Dreher's trial.
The three judge appeals court panel
said the ordinance did not meet stan-
dards of definiteness. Dreher's com-
pliance with it hinged on the officer's
personal sense of annoyance over the
dog's barking.
The judges wondered about the
meaning of the words in the ordi-
nance that set standards by forbid-
ding animals "which shall by any
noise disturb the peace and quiet of
any persons in the vicinity."
"Does that include several- month-
old babies which may easily be dis-
turbed and cry at any strange sound?
Does it include the elderly or anyone
who is extremely sensitive and
claims to be disturbed by any noise
above the normal hum of conversa-
tion? Does it include persons who,
because of their love of pets, have an
extremely high tolerance for barking
dogs and mewing cats, or do we go by
the standards of those who strongly
dislike any pet within a residential
area ?" wrote Judge R.A. Randall for
the panel.
The city had argued on appeal that
the phrase "disturb the peace and
quiet" has a well- accepted, generally
understood meaning. The city looked
to three cases where convictions
stemming from violations of similar
ordinances on disturbing the peace
were upheld. Those cases involved
Vietnam protesters who disrupted
the Aquatennial parade, an individ-
ual who berated a clergyman during a
church service and refused to leave,
and protesters who blocked entrances
and damaged property at a restau-
rant.
The court said those cases were dif-
ferent from the Edina situation be-
cause they involved clear, observ-
able, deviant conduct.
In addition to the ordinance not put-
ting Dreher on notice of what con-
duct is prohibited, it invites arbitrary
enforcement, said Randall.
"Because the city failed to introduce
any evidence from the original com-
plainants who reported appellant's
dog barking, the question whether
appellant violated the ordinance de-
pended entirely on the officer's
threshold of annoyance," the court
said.
In reversing Dreher's conviction, the'
court said the case was very similar
to one decided recently by the Wash-
ington Supreme Court. The Minne-
sota court said it was adopting the
reasoning of that case, which said
that because the ordinance turned on
the neighbors' level of tolerance or
intolerance for barking, an average
person of common intelligence could
not determine how much noise was
prohibited.
Power failures
Vandalism was suspected in two
power failures that left about 92,000
people without power for six hours,
Pacific Gas & Electric said Monday.
Residents of Santa Cruz and Watson-
ville, Calif., were affected by the fail-
ures, caused by damage to power
poles.
tI V Ul V Q 1 r
Your Secretary's Day!
Wednesday, April 25, remember the one who
remembers everything by choosing from an array
of elegant "thank you's ": pearlized ceramic Keep-
sake Boxes holding rich Truffles, sleek white lac-
quer Ballotins with luscious assortments of Milk
and Dark chocolates, Gold Ballotins blossoming
with silky roses and more. You're sure to find the
O D I VAS,
perfect gift at Godiva. So not only, will we make
�G
.
,your secretary's day brighter —we'll make your
Secretary's Day easier, too!
Crystal Court
IDS Center, 80 So. 8th Street, Minneapolis
338 -6800
i
L 'fie uri
0
0
d
P
i
REQUEST .FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director Park
and Recreation Department
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: may 4, 1990
AGENDA ITEM yll.A.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Construction
of protection wall for lesson tee.'
Company
Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Jackson Landscape
1. $8,970
2. Palani Construction
2. $12,575
3.
3.
4.
4.
5.
5
RECOMMENDED ,QUOTE OR. BID:
Jackson Landscape $8,970
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Construction of a.wall to protect'the lesson tee area at the.North
end,of Braemar Golf Course Driving Range. The Driving Range North
end.fence will be removed to give extra length to Driving Range.
The new wall will:
.1. stop rolling balls up on the lesson tee area, and
2. protect.slope area of'the tee
340 fee of timber wall ranging from 6 inches to 3 feet back to 6 inches
depending on'.topography. and slope of tee, within the 340 feet.
nature. Dwartmeat
The Recommended bid is X".
within' budget not w
Kenneth Roslanii, City —
Manager
Director
N° REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
a O:
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director Park and Recreation Department
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: May 3, 1990
AGENDA ITEM V T T _ R _
ITEM DESCRIPTION: 15 new golf cars with 10 car trade -in.
Companv Amount of Quote or Bid
1. GOLF CAR MIDWEST 1. $34,695.
2. VERSATILE VEHICLES 2. $35,950
3. MINNESOTA GOLF CARS, INC.(does not meet 3.
4. specifications) 4 $31,925
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
GOLF CAR MIDWEST $34,695
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Low bid is rejected because it did not meet specifications. The low
bidder is aware of not meeting specifications, but still wanted to bid.
Basic reason for bid rejection: 1. Does not meet self adjusting brake
system., 2. self adjusting electric accelerator control does not meet
specifications.
The Recommended bid is
within budget na
r
0
A.
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM:Bob Kojetin, Director Park and Recreation Department
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE. May 4, 1990 AGENDA ITEM VII. C.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Ice resurfacer
Companv Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Becker Arena Products, Inc. 1. $47,938
2. Frank J. Zamboni & Co., Inc. 2. $50,530
3.
3.
4.
4
S.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Reject Bids
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Not within budget for first phase Centennial Equipment.
"Si Si ature
The Recommended bid is
within budget not within 4Wg0t
Department
i
0-'i.1 Cl-'Lq=
Finance Director
�� nneth Rosland, C' Manager
REQUEST FOR, PURCHASE
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: GORDON L. HUGHES, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER,
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00
DATE MAY 7, 1990
AGENDA ITEM VII.D
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Goose Management Contract
Companv Amount of Quote or Bid
1' University of Minnesota $ 21,000
2. 2.
3. 3.
4. no other bids 4
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
University of.Minnesota $ 21,000
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This is !a three year,contract for goose removal.from City
lakes and ponds. It is-a continuation of the program which
has been in place for the past. three years.
Signature ,) Depa ment
1
The Recommended bid is
within budget not within b get _16hn Wallin; F' ance Dir
Kenneth Rosland City Manager
A.
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: GORDON L. HUGHES
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000
DATE: APRIL 16, 1990 AGENDA ITEM VII.E
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Company
1.
MINNETONKA WEED EATERS
2.
MIDWEST AQUA CARE
3.
4.
5.
MILL POND WEED HARVESTING
Amount of Quote or &d
1. $ 7,840.00
2. 8,768.00
3.
4.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Recommend low bid to Minnetonka Weed Eaters at $7,840.00.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
The proposals are for the annual aquatic weed harvesting
of the Mill Pond.
Signature
The Recommended bid is x —
within budget not
4J r,- -
Kenneth Rosland, &yy Manager
`T7A..NIT
REQUEST UEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and.Council.Members
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director Park and Recreation Department
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000
DATE: May 4, 1990 AGENDA ITEM Vi l . F
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Rework peat of #2 fairway at. Braemar Colf Course
Company Amount-of Quote or &d
1• Perkins Landscape 1 $5,808..
2• Matt Bullock,Construction 2. $12,513
3. g
4.. 4
5• 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BD:.
Perkins Landscape .
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Rework of 5 acres of peat area between Braemar Boulevard.and #2 fairway,
from .#2 tee long North edge df fairway on both sides.of pond up to
road and behind #2 green. Grading and seeding, this does not include
fabric.
Si ture Department
The Recommended bid is
within budget not within budget .. Wallin, Fin nce Director
Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
40
�• RPOM'DO 4
age
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
From: GORDON L. HUGHES
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
Date: MAY 7, 1990
Subject: TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTS
UPDATE
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # VIII.A
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
❑ To Council
Action ❑ Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
FE Discussion
Continued from April 16, 1990 regular Council meeting.
Info /Background:
��v9lv��r'lr\
o •r -\
`l Cn
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
From: GORDON L. HUGHES
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
Dater APRIL 16, 1990
Subject: TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTS
UPDATE
Recommendation:
Info/Background-
Agenda Item #
VII.B
Consent
(F7
Information Only
F7
Mgr . Recommends
To HRA
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
_
Resolution
Ordinance
0
Discussion
As you know, on April 2, 1990, the City Council approved the establishment
of Tax Increment Financing districts at 44th & France, Valley View &
Wooddale and 70th Street and Cahill Road. Staff is currently preparing the
documents necessary to request certification of these districts by Hennepin
County.
Based on the Council's action of April 2, 1990, we understand that projects
and proposals associated with these districts should be generated by the
property owners and the development community rather than the staff.
Therefore, we have not initiated any discussions with property owners or
developers concerning projects in these three areas. The Council, however,
may consider the continuation of dialogue between the City and property
owners which we would do through Peter Meyers. Whichever direction the
Council wishes, we want to make sure the staff understands Council
direction. We of course will meet with and respond to any thoughts that
property owners or the development communities have.
350 PA AVENUE
NEW YORE, NEW YORK 10022
(212)415 -9200
1330 CONNECTICUT AVENUE. N. W.
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20036
(202)857 -0700
3 ORACECHURCH STREET
LONDON EC3V OAT, ENGLAND
01- 929 -3334
36,RUE TRONCHET
75009 PARIS, FRANCE
01- 42- 66 -59 -49
FAH EAST FINANCE CENTER
- - - -HO1NO HONG -
852 -5- 8612555
Mr. Gordon Hughes
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
DOI3SEY & WHITNEY
A P�zRSNiY INCLQDfNO PROFESS- CO-ONS
2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
(612 ) 340-2600
TELEX 29 -0605
FAX (612) 340 -2868
JEROME P. Gns IGAN
(614 340-2=
May 7,1990
Re:. Effect of 1990 Tax Increment Amendments on
44th & France, Valley View & Wooddale and
70th & Cahill TIF Districts.
Dear Gordon:
340 FIRST NATIONAL BANE BUILDING
ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 55903
(507) 288 -3156
315 FIRST NATIONAL BANE BUILDING
WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391
(612)475 -0373
1200 FIRST INTERSTATE CENTER
BILLINOS, MONTANA 59103
(406)252 -3800
201 DAVIDSON BUILDING
GREAT FALLS, MONTANA 59401
(406)727 -3632
127 EAST FRONT STREET
MISSOULA, MONTANA 59802
(406) 721 -6025
On April 2nd, the City Council approved the establishment of three tax
increment districts in the City.covering the areas at 44th & France, Valley View &
Wooddale and 70th & Cahill. The 44th & France district was qualified as a
redevelopment district, and the Valley View & Wooddale and 70th & Cahill districts
were qualified as economic development districts. On April 20, the City filed a
request with Hennepin Council to certify the original tax capacity of the districts.
A major consideration' of the City Council in creating these districts
was to be grandfathered from additional restrictions on tax increment financing
which were then being considered by the Legislature. The Legislature eventually
enacted these additional restrictions in the Tax Bill passed on the final day of the
session. These restrictions, among other things, eliminate the ability of the City to
create economic development tax increment districts for commercial areas (such as
the Valley View & Wooddale and 70th & Cahill districts), and tighten the
requirements for creating redevelopment tax increment districts by eliminating the
provision under which the 44th & France district qualified as a redevelopment
district.
Generally the additional restrictions are effective for tax increment
districts for which certification was requested after April 30, 1990. However, for
DOKSEY & WHITNEY
Page -2-
Mr. Gordon Hughes
May 7,1990
districts for which the request for certification was filed during April 1990 (such as
the 44th & France, Valley View & Wooddale and 70th & Cahill districts), the bill
provides that the amendments are effective for such districts if by June 1, 1991 none
of the following actions are taken: (i) a development agreement is entered into by
the City for a site in the district, (ii) bonds were issued to finance project costs or (iii)
the City acquires property in the district after April 1 (the statute does not reference
April 1 of what year, but I assume the intent is April 1, 1990).
The effect of this effective date provision on the 44th & France, Valley
View & Wooddale and 70th & Cahill districts, is that unless one of the conditions
set forth above is met for such district by June 1, 1991, such district will no longer
qualify as a tax increment district after such date. It is important to note that the test
will be applied to each district separately, and the failure to satisfy the condition for
one district will not affect another district where one of the conditions has been
satisfied by June 1, 1991.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call me.
Yours truly,
o P. hGillilga
JPG:cmn - -
cc: Tom Erickson
ti
A.
o e t Ict
Cn
J • f��Rronw�bJ •
lase
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER
Agenda Item ##
VIII.B �
From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Date: MAY 4, 1990
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject: DOG LICENSE RENEWAL
❑
To Council
PROCESS
Action
IF I
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑I
Ordinance
;
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Info /Background:
At the April 16, 1990 Council Meeting, the Council deferred discussion and
action on the dog license renewal process because of the late hour.
The packet data from that meeting is attached.
i
o e
J RRJM'
� J j
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
From. ZEN ROSLAND, :TANAGER
Date: APRIL 13, 1990 .
Subject. DOG LICENSING RENEWAL
PROCESS
Recommendation:
Agenda Item I# VII.0
i
Consent
Information Only I
Mgr. Recommends To HRA
To Council
I
Action Xi Motion
Resolution
Ordinance
Discussion i
Council approval of dog license mail -out renewal process.
Info /Ba ckground:
At previous Council meetings the subject of mailing out renewal notices for
dog licenses has been discussed and as requested by the Council background
information on dog licensing was provided together with estimated costs for
mailing out renewal notices. (Copies attached.)
I concur with Chief Swanson's recommendation that the City instigate dog
license renewals through a mail -out process.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Dog Licensing
DATE: March 26, 1990
The attached "draft" form is provided in accordance with the Council's request.
The form would be sent out in November anticipating the December 31st license
expiration. A letter acknowledging the license renewal would be sent to those
who choose to use the mailing format.
As recommended in my memo to you on March 16, 1990, I would encourage the use
of any unanticipated revenue to identify and license currently unlicensed dogs.
Conservative estimates are that the number of unlicensed dogs exceeds the total
that are or have been licensed. As many as 1500 unlicensed dogs may exist in
Edina.
To identify unlicensed dogs, the following examples might be implemented.
* Authorize veterinarians to sell licenses at the time of
initial rabies vaccinations.
* Have veterinarians hand out the attached renewal card at
the time of initial rabies vaccinations.
* Set up vaccination /licensing clinics at reduced rates.
* Request veterinarians to provide a list of vaccinated dogs.
* Discuss a "life time" license.
* Discuss "free licensing" of cats and dogs that have been
vaccinated and spayed or neutered.
If you have questions or comments, please contact me.
Craig Swanson
Chief of Police
{
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Kenneth E. Rosland
FROM: Craig G. Swanson
SUBJECT: Doz Licensing
DATE: March 16, 1990
At the March 5, 1990, Council meeting, questions arose regarding
notification to dog owners-for license renewal. Facts about licensing
include:
* Rationale for licensing:
- A means of identifying stray or lost dogs and establishing proof
of ownership.
- A mechanism for assuring that animals are vaccinated against
rabies.
a Total licenses issued:
1989 - 570
1988 - 585
1987 - 629
* Renewals:
55% previously licensed
34% licensed during preceding year
11% never licensed before
• Estimates of the dog population-
- Approximately 1,000 dogs licensed during 1984 -1989.
- 60 %+ of dogs are never licensed.
- Estimated 2,500 dog population in Edina.
• Renewal mailout cost (1,000 addresses):
printed mailer - $300.00
postage - 140.00
labels - 28.00
staff time (mailout only) - _60.00
$528.00
I recommend a renewal mailout. It will generate a larger percentage of
renewals. Revenue from the renewals will generate $2,000 to $4,000. I
further recommend that this revenue be used to attack the larger problem of
unlicensed dogs.
If you have questions or comments, please contact me.
CRAIG SWANSON
CHIEF F POLICE
HELP US HELP YOU.
IL-Ul OR. BRNG Lei YOUR APPUCAMON TOD Ul
j
All dogs over 6 months of age must be licensed with the City. All licenses a :pine
December 31st of the year in which they are issued. The license mg you receive must
-.e won by your dog at all times. Licensing provides the City with a method of
Lhat dos 3r° proper
v3CC:.'la:ed �g�': St rabies.
_dditionally, CUQ o%mers receive t:emendousvalue nom a ilcerse :n authonties
make e': err effort, to r eturn lost dogs to their homes when they are we:.z ng a cu.reat
'license. All other does are a spored to the animal shelter ir. 31oorningtan where
impounding and boarding `eels are charged..
— NSI IUMO`S I
ter.; .:s sp;i�e�an a Ctg i'.]:l —'P. :n= • .- log Lm-J& (:Ity of ?den ?rzr a. . JLa hmne. 4.14
ia>r:::'leeae inao�ie ;:.00 .'x tact V; :3 ae orsac -NUkC deela p3ti-Ank :a cay I E_an ?=-m I
i . DOG LICENSE aPPUCATION
C-w-ners name
:Address
Home prune
Dugs nacre (:st)
Uor
Breed
Szc: M ❑ F -
Rabies Tag d D=e Vet Clinic
�' ;'s acme (? ^.c:) orecd _ _..
'4 C�iur _ Sex: `I Q c C: — – -��- ?-
Rabies Tz9 Due Vat Clinic
— LUNRUN T NOTICE —
A;,;dC== sell aoe W uaepted wig: out mmpiete ribes riewmLim isdanuliott 7= infamadaa :s on )W thadnre of
vimmanoa Ptan == 7w m Clinic if necawary.
e
A.
e tA
• `NCbHpOM� °J •
lase
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item ##
• C
From:
KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER
Consent
u
Information Only
U
Date:
11AY 4, 1990
Mgr. Recommends
El
To HRA
Subject:
REQUEST FOR VACATION OF
n
To Council
DUGGAN PLAZA (REYES).
Action
r--�
I x
Motion
!
Resolution
Ordinance
Discussion
Recommendation:
Because of the complexity of the ownership of the small island and adjoining
strips of land if the City were to vacate the properties, staff would recommend
that the request be denied and that Mr. Reyes be so informed by letter.
Info /Background:
At the meeting of April 16, 1990, the Council acknowledged receipt of a letter
from E. David Reyes, 701 4th Avenue South, Minneapolis, requesting the City
to vacate a small center island in Duggan Plaza (copy attached). The matter
was referred to staff for further study and recommendation.
Attorney Erickson has researched the history and ownership of the property
if the city were to grant the vacation. A copy of his findings dated April '23,
1990, is also attached.
It is my recollection that a similar request was made some years ago following
the construction of Highway 100 and was turned down for similar reasons.
v
701 4th Avenue South
Suite 350
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415
April 10, 1990
City Clerk
Edina City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Counsel Members:
I am requesting that a small portion of land be eliminated
from the tax rolls and put on for public listing. The current
property identification number is 0411621340061, referring to a
center island and small lot located east of Danens Drive on the
center line of Duggan Plaza.
I am interested in purchasing the lot and building a home on
it. Please provide me with any information on how to purchase
the lot from the City. My home address is:
E. David Reyes
616 West 53rd Street, #506
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55419
Telephone: 612/824 -6058
Thank you very much for your cooperation.
EDR:tk
Sincerely,
E. DAVID REY'ES
Telephone: (612) 348 -5967
TDD: (612) 348 -5861
GOVT LOT 4�o.,P�°
. M
2i 90.6/ Res.
920.0 `
ev � O _ i131�
m ti q0 I • ��
ILIA
am
g a .35 50 35 F,.b. ;�60 `R
1 al .A `I �1 . • t•! i . r Q .N ��. " �1 �I jib H•
«
fDA� ,•,.
p 52 104 0 /a0 . J 90 d0 94 of i rWL 1
m y (
46 11 _
co 90 i O�BO li/1 u. r �• tj OD
ti O
IC
lMr 9 _
�
� 37 M� iZ K 3L� � � y7,
Le
2
�N hp0: y • ;• - ti><� 3S so ZL6 4i � t, °! �� 9c•
-,' - / �$1- � � ` •V = �,' ��lr) -� e•� 4 rte\
/ N t•'lyy i : •p0' 0 s o 57
Jr�s ti� q1 (T.q� :: ' _ i- - - - �'}''• -,s:� 44� o %, � ♦`° y' •" �5 �
��• S/ ` °, (q /•P 0. `� ar -
an
v40 t3 yp - oI/ ^�. �4I52 r 5
LD
CA
N 1w
: .1G_). N N �-
►1j 7f�
130 ti 1 •' "' f %l.S ^• '..
CY
In
UF
C�i /� Ob v i4 4 �J`I�•g• ° u ry ''Qp N ° o� ff0• 16 .
•s q0 , _v1110• 9i' rV j6/ � M O) 1 ep .�..p J,y \�� �` y / eo.
+ Fs�``. eo
iii r • 3 ? op .ti. .� _ tv ,� off.
0l �'�� �♦ - Iii �� 0Q•ts \raj/ •�
in
X1'1, \ `• �01 �,ii l � � .,w�/�,�'�� ♦ � 1 .h • 7f �, ^ �� �• "'� ",jt� ..s • • � 7�r' e`oe� ♦` ^� . � 1��r/ .�
Ib6 j; !% ^ ��J OAT e�b 0.``k• ^° fl �•Ow .f;ZZ.� -s' ^ ♦h, O tiw� e -
let
350 PARE AVENUE
NEW YORK, NEW YORE 10022
(212)415 -9200
1330 CONNECTICUT AVENUE, N. W.
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20036
(202)857 -0700
3 GRACECHURCH STREET
LONDON BC3V OAT, ENGLAND
01- 929-3334
36, RUE TRONCHET
75009 PARIS, FRANCE
0I- 42- 66 -59 -49
FAR EAST FINANCE CENTER
HONG KONG
882 -5- 8612555
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland
City Manager
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
DORSEY & WHITNEY
A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROPESSIONAL CORPORATIONS
2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
(612) 340 -2600
TELEX 29 -0605
FAX (612) 340-2668
THOMAS S. ERICKSON, P. A.
(612) 340 -2659
April 23, 1990
Re: Request for Vacation of Duggan Plaza
Dear Mr. Rosland:
340 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 55903
(507) 288 -3136
315 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
WAYZATA, MINNBSOTA 55391
(612) 475-0373
1200 FIRST INTERSTATE CENTER
BILLINGS, MONTANA 59103
(406)252 -3000
201 DAVIDSON BUILDING
GREAT PALLS, MONTANA 59401
(406)727 -3632
127 EAST FRONT STREET
MISSOULA, MONTANA 59502
(406) 721 - 6025
A Mr. E. David Reyes, by letter dated April 10, 1990, to the City Clerk,
has requested that a small center island in Duggan Plaza and lying east of Danens
Drive be vacated. You have asked me to inquire into the ownership of that property
in the event of vacation.
The whole of the Street known as Duggan Plaza came out of the plat of
Brookview Heights 1st Addition. This means that if the street were vacated the
whole of the vacated would be owned by the property owners to the north of the
street. There are two lots lying north of the street and lying east of Danens Drive
and west of Highway 100. The most westerly lot is privately owned. The most
easterly lot is owned by the State of Minnesota having acquired it in connection
with the Highway 100 improvements.
In the middle of Duggan Plaza, and east of Danens Drive is an island. It
is unclear from the plat whether or not that island was dedicated as a part of the
street of Duggan Plaza itself. Apparently, it was concluded by the taxing authorities
that it was not a part of the dedicated street because it was taxed and eventually
forfeited to the State of Minnesota for non - payment of taxes. In turn, the.State of
Minnesota conveyed it to the City of Edina to be used as a park and open space.
Should the street be vacated and the City no longer need or want the small island
DoRSEY & WHITNEY
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland
April 23, 1990
Page 2
for the public purpose for which it was granted to the City, then the City should
reconvey the property back to the State of Minnesota. If not reconveyed, it will
- automatically revert pursuant to the terms of the deed and applicable statutes.
Therefore, if the street is vacated, it would appear appropriate for the City to
reconvey the small island back to the State of Minnesota.
Based on the foregoing, the end result of a vacation and reconveyance
by the City would be that the property owner to the north would own two 35 foot
strips of land, one north and one south of the island in the middle of the street, and
the State of Minnesota would own the island in the middle of the street. As we
have previously discussed in other contexts, the County may well be willing to sell
the island to the adjoining property owner, meaning the property owner to the
north of the vacated street.
I trust the foregoing is responsive to your inquiry. If you have any
further questions, please let me know.
Very truly yours,
-y . ��
Thomas S. Eric son
TSE:amo
d
r
/art A. '►?r��
O
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
T0: Edina City Council
From: Craig G. Swanson
Chief of Police
Date: May 7, 1990
Subject:
Court of Appeals decision
regarding Edina City
ordinance, 312, Animal
Control
Recommendation:
Info /Background:
Agenda Item # VIII.];
Consent ❑
Information Only Fx]
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
❑ To Council
Action ❑ Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
The attached Minnesota Court of Appeals decision was handed down
on April 17, 1990. The staff, in conjunction with the City
Prosecutor, are researching various alternatives to this decision
and will report their recommendations to the City Council on
June 18, 1990.
i
ME—DIA .AND COU14SEL ARE PROHIBITED FROM MAMIG
THIS) OPRI IOi,W8r', KR'F, ikH ±0R TO
12:01 VNMCO2RT1'-IDE'IIk'PB S
A P P E a�MT� Ljg �v9 I
Hennepin County Randall, Judge
City of Edina, Hubert H. Humphrey, III
Attorney General -
Respondent, 200 Ford Building
117 University Avenue
St. Paul, MN 55155
Marshall Halberg
David J. McGee
Thomsen, Nybeck Law Firm
Edinborough Corporate Center E.
3300 Edinborough Way
Edina, MN 55435
VS.
Roger H. Dreher, Steven D. DeRuyter .
Leonard, Street & Deinard
Appellant. 150 South Fifth Street
Suite 2300
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Filed April 24, 1990 .
Office of Appellant Courts
S Y L L A B U S
City ordinance that prohibited owning an animal that "by any
noise disturbs the peace and quiet of persons in the vicinity"
did not provide adequate notice or adequate standards to prevent ±
arbitrary enforcement and therefore violates due process of law.
Reversed.
Considered and decided by Randall, Presiding Judge, Foley,
Judge, and Gardebring, Judge.
0 P I N I.0 IV
RANDALL, Judge
This is an appeal from judgment against appellant for
violating a city ordinance that prohibits a person from keeping
an animal which by any noise disturbs the peace and quiet of
persons in -the vicinity. Appellant argues that the city
ordinance denies him due process of law. We reverse.
FACTS
On August 14, 1989, an Edina community officer was dispatched
by the police department to answer a citizen's complaint that a
dog was barking at the house of appellant Roger Dreher. Upon
reaching the house, the officer sat in his vehicle and from about
50 yards away listened to appellant's dog bark
the officer left a warning citation and a copy
Ordinance, Number 312, 5 29(j) (Dec. 2, 1981),
No person owning, operating, having charge
occupying any building or premises shall k+
allow to be kept any animal which shall by
disturb the peace and quiet of any persons
vicinity thereof.
Before leaving,
of-'Edina City
which orovides:
C-4 or
?eo or
any noise
in the
Two days later another complaint was made about appellant's
dog by a second individual. The same community officer stopped
near appellant's house and listened for about 10 minutes while �a
the dog barked. The officer testified that on this second
occasion he could hear barking and also "a howling or whining
type noise." The officer further testified that it was a higher
frequency and the "frequency and consistency were disturbing."
-2-
A
He testified that the dog barked about every 10 seconds for
approximately 10 minutes.
The officer then issued a formal citation to appellant for
violating the Edina ordinance. At trial neither of the original
complainants were called, and the city's case rested on solely on
the officer's testimony. After trial to the court, appellant was
convicted of violating the Edina ordinance and assessed a $30
fine, plus court costs.
ISSUE
Does Edina City Ordinance, Number 312, 9 29(j), as applied to
appellant, violate due process of law?
ANALYSIS
Appellant asserts that Edina City Ordinance, :umber 312,
29(j), is unconstitutionally vague as applied to him and thereby
deprives him of due process of law.
The Edina ordinance must meet due process standards of
definiteness under both the United States Constitution and the
Minnesota Constitution. State v. Newstrom, 371 N.W.2d 525, 528
(Minn. 1985). Persons of common intelligence must not be left to
guess at. the meaning of the ordinance nor differ as to its
application. Id. The purposes of the void for vagueness
doctrine are to put people on notice of what conduct is
prohibited and, more importantly, to discourage arbitrary and
discriminatory law enforcement. Kolender,v. Lawson, 461 U.S.
352, 357 (1983).
- 3 -
When fundamental" rights are not involved, as here, vagueness
challenges must be examined. in light of the defendant's actual
conduct. State v. Becker, 351 N.W.2d 923, 925 (Minn. 1984).
Appellant must show that the ordinance "lacks, specificity as to
his own behavior and not as to some hypothetical situation."
State v. Kager, 382 N.W.2d 287, 289 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986), pet.
for rev. denied (Minn. April 24, 1986). Appellant must prove a
constitutional violation beyond a reasonable doubt. Rio Vista
Non- Profit Housing Coro. v. County of Ramsev, 335 N.W.2d 242, 245
,
(Minn. 1983) appeal dismissed, 464 U.S. 1033 (1984).
Respondent contends the phrase "disturb the peace and quiet"
has a well accepted, generally understood meaning so that when
applied to appellant's conduct, it meets the constitutional
standard. We disagree. Respondent cites three cases for.
support. In State v. Johnson, 282 Minn. 153, 163 N.W.2d 750
(1968), Vietnam war protesters disrupted the Minneapolis
Aquatennial parade by climbing lamp posts, shouting, and
distributing leaflets. Charged with violating a Minneapolis
ordinance that punishes "conduct which disturbs the peace and
quiet," the protesters challenged the ordinance on vagueness
grounds.l The supreme court rejected the challenge, reasoning '#
.1. The entire ordinance reads:
No person, in any public or private place, shall engage
in, or prepare, attempt, offer or threaten to engage in,
or assist or conspire with another to engage in or
congregate because of, any riot, fight, brawl,
tumultuous conduct, act of violence, or any other
conduct which disturbs the peace and quiet of another
save for participating in a recognized athletic
contest. Johnson, 282 Minn. at 158 n.l, 163 N.W.2d at
753 n.l (quoting Minneapolis Code of Ordinances, §
870.060).
- 4 -
that the defendants were aware of the nature of the charged
offense, that is, creating traffic congestion during a parade.
Johnson, 282 Minn. at 159, 163 N.W.2d at 754. Similarily, in
another case, the supreme court affirmed a conviction under the
same ordinance when the defendant entered a church during a
reverential part of the service, berated a clergyman, and refused
to leave. State v. Olson, 287 Minn. 300, 301 -02, 178 N.W.2d 230,
231 (1970). Finally, in 1973 the supreme court rejected a
vagueness challenge to Minn. Stat. § 607.705(3), the unlawful
assembly statute, when protesters disrupted operation of a
restaurant by blocking entrances and damaging property.2 State
v. Hipp, 298 Minn. 81, 89 -90,. 213 N.W.2d 610, 615 -16 (1973).
Respondent's reliance on these cases is misplaced. Unlike
Johnson, Olson, and Hipp where clear observable deviant conduct
occurred, appellant's compliance with the ordinance hinged on the
officer's personal sense of annoyance over the sound of a natural
act, a dog barking. Blocking traffic, disrupting a church
service, or interfering with a business are unusual acts, and may
be understood by ordinary people of common intelligence as
disturbing the peace. Here appellant was left to guess whether
hss_ dog's barking disturbed others in the vicinity. The +*
2. The statute provides in part:
When three or more persons assemble, each person is
guilty of unlawful assembly which is a misdemeanor, if
the assembly is: * * * Without lawful purpose, but the
participants so conduct themselves in a disorderly
manner as to disturb or threaten the public peace.
Hipp, 298 Minn. at 82, 213 N.W.2d at 612 (quoting Minn.
Stat. § 609.705 (3)).
-5-
ordinance provided no objective standard against which appellant
could measure the level of his dog's barking.
The key words in the ordinance are "by any noise disturb the
peace and quiet of any persons in the vicinity." who.does that
mean? Does that include several month old babies which may
easily be disturbed and cry at any strange sound? Does it
include the elderly or anyone who is extremely sensitive and
claims to be disturbed by any noise above the normal hum of
conversation? Does it include persons who, because of their love
of pets, have an extremel., high tolerance for barking dogs and
mewing .cats, or do we go by the standards of those who strongly
dislike any pet within a residential area? The ordinance as
written gives no guidance to the pet owner, the neighbor, or the
investigating officer as to what is allowable barking and what is
not.
Besides =ail i n:j tco out appellant on notice of what conduct is
prohibited, the ordinance invites arbitrary enforcement. A city
may enforce ordinances that reasonably specify what conduct is
prohibited. However, it may not enforce an ordinance "whose
violation may entirely depend upon whether or not a police _
officer is annoyed." Coates v. Cincinnati, 402 U.S. 611, 614
(1971). Yet this is precisely what ;.his Edina ordinance does.
Because the city failed to introduce any evidence from the
original complainants who reported appellant's dog barking, the
question whether appellant violated the ordinance depended
y.
entirely on the officer's threshhold of annoyance.3 Under these
circumstances the Edina ordinance violates appellant's right to
due process of law and therefore we reverse his conviction.
We note that the Washington Supreme Court recently addressed
this. same issue involving similar facts and a parallel
ordinance. See City of Spokane v. Fischer, 110 Wash.2d.541, 754
P.2d 1241 (1988). In Fischer, the ordinance provided for
conviction if a dog were permitted to "disturb or annoy another
person or neighbor by frequent or habitual howling, yelping or
barking." Id. at 543, 754 P.2d at 1241. The court held the
ordinance was unconstitutionally vague. It reasoned that because
violation of the ordinance turned on the neighbors' level of
tolerance or intolerance for barking, an average person of common
intelligence could not determine prohibited conduct. We find the
reasoning by the court in Fischer logical and persuasive, and
adopt it in this case.
3. Edina City Ordinance Number 312, § 29(k) provides that before
an officer may issue a citation he must personally
investigate the circumstances forming the basis of the
complaint. As respondent explained it, this requirement is
practical and exemplary. It puts the buffer of a police
officer between.two neighbors and, in theory, should help
screen nuisance calls from neighbors involved in a petty
backyard dispute. However, when the prosecuting authorities
made the decision not to call either of the two original
complainants to identify by direct evidence what they heard
and observed, the city, even though encouraging politeness
and good manners between neighbors, deliberately deprived
itself of its best evidence. Prosecuting authorities always
have the privilege of excepting witnesses from their case in
chief, but they also accept the risk that their case becomes
weaker.
-7-
}
D E C I S I O N
Edina City Ordinance, Number 312, § 29(j) is unconstitu-
tionally vague as applied to appellant and deprives him of due
process of law.
Reversed.
-8
"U
J
�1
A.
oe ,:
,
BOB
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis Hoffman
City Engineer J
Date: 7 May, 1990
Subject: Storm Sewer Projects:
Storm Sewer Improvement 204
Easement Line - Parkwood Knolls
Storm Sewer Improvement 205
Easement Line - Dundee Road
Storm Sewer Improvement 206
Easement Line - E. Sunnyslope Rd.
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # VII
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
0
Action 0
❑
I. E.
To HRA
To Council
Motion
Resolution
Ordinance
Discussion
A. Authorize bids for Improvement Projects 204, 205 and 206.
B. Nine Mile Creek Watershed District request for emergency overflow at
Vernon Avenue and Walnut Ridge Park.
Info/ Background
The following projects have been reviewed for feasibility and are consistent
with our overall stormwater management program:
(A) Location: Easement line - Parkwood Knolls Addition (Project 204)
Estimated Cost: $17,801.28
Description: This project is a replacement of an existing pipe and
pond outlot located north of Parkwood Road and east of Westwood Court.
(B) Location: Easement line - East Sunnyslope Road (Project 206)
Estimated Cost: $16,327.36
Description: This project is a replacement of existing catch basin and
pipe on East Sunnyslope Road and addition of a backyard drain west of
East Sunnyslope Road. This area is the low point for several
backyards.
Report /Recommendation
Storm Sewer.Projects:
Storm Sewer Improvement 204
Easement Line - Parkwood Knolls
Storm Sewer Improvement 205
Easement Line - Dundee Road
Storm Sewer Improvement 206
Easement Line - E. Sunnyslope Road
Page Two
(C) Location: Easement line - Dundee Road (Project 205)
Estimated Cost: $ 5,885.60
Description: This project is extending an existing storm sewer into a
backyard area which is the low point for, several backyards. This area
was-flooded in the frozen ground -rain conditions in March. The
neighbors have petitioned for this addition.
The three above projects are recommended to be funded thru the Stormwater
Utility Fund.
Additionally, we have received a request for an emergency overflow system
from the neighbors bordering Walnut Ridge Park area. The request is to
provide an overflow pipe across Vernon Avenue at Nine Mile Creek. Staff is
aware that Nine Mile Creek Watershed District is reviewing this type of
improvement in light of the 1987 (Federal disaster) rainstorm event. Staff
recommendation is to request Watershed review and funding of this type of
project.
Staff will present graphics on these four sites at the Council meeting.
ch
o
• 'N�APON`Zbv •
IBBB
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Ken Rosland, Manager
From: Marcella Daehn, Clerk
Date: May 4, 1990
Subject: On -Sale Wine License and
On -Sale Beer License for
Scott Kee's Tour de Fran
4924 France Avenue So.
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # VIII.F
Consent ❑
❑
Information Only ❑
❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
❑ T
To HRA
❑� T
To Cou
Action ❑
❑ M
Motion
L1 R
Resolut
!; I O
Ordinen
❑ D
Discus
Approval of Issuance of an On -Sale Beer License and On -Sale Wine License to
Scott Kee's Tour de France restaurant at 4924 France Avenue South.
Info /Background:
The City has received applications for both an On -Sale Beer License and an
On -Sale Wine License from Scott Kee's Tour de France restaurant located at
4924 France Avenue South, together with applications for two Manager's Licenses.
The applications have been reviewed by the Police, Health and Planning Departments
and the necessary investigations have been conducted. Hemorandums are attached
from these departments in support of issuance of the On -Sale Wine License.
The departments have also approved issuance of the beer license.
`j
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Kenneth E. Rosland
FROM: Craig G. Swanson
SUBJECT: On -Sale Wine License
DATE: April 23, 1990
The on -sale wine license application of the below - listed .
establishment has been investigated in accordance with applicable
statutes and ordinances:
Scott Kee's Tour de France
4924 France Ave. S.
Edina, MN 55410
The findings of this investigation do not reveal information that
is contrary to the public interest for the purpose of licensing.
Therefore, I recommend the Council move to approve the
application and issuance of an on -sale wine license for the
establishment conditioned upon approval by the State of
Minnesota, and instruct the City Clerk to forward the required
documents to the State of Minnesota for their approval.
CRAIG G. SWANSON
CHIEF/OF POLICE.
CGS:nah
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Kenneth Rosland
FROM: Elliott Marston
SUBJECT: On -Sale Wine License Application
DATE: May 7, 1990
The on -sale wine license application for Scott Kee's Tour de France, 4924 France
Avenue South, Edina, MN. has been reviewed by the Health Department.
Our investigation of the premises finds that the subject restaurant complies
with the requirements of Ordinance No. 902 with respect to seating capacity,
food establishment license and appropriate storage and food handling space
which is not adversely impacted by the storage and service of wine.
I would recommend that the on -sale wine license be approved.
i
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Kenneth E. Rosland
FROM: Craig Larsen, City Planner(/ /
SUBJECT: On -Sale Wine License - Scott Kee's Tour de France
DATE: May 7, 1990
The on -sale wine license application for Scott Kee's Tour de France, 4924 France
Avenue South, Edina, MN. has been reviewed by the Planning Department.
The premises meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and I would recommend
approval of the license application.
Agenda Item IX.A.1 & 2
`SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION
C/O MOSS & BARNETT
4800 Norwest Center
90 SOLIth Seventh Street
Muineapolis, MN 55402 -4119
(612) 347 -0300
April 18, 1990
Mr. Kenneth Rosland
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th St.
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Ken:
Please find enclosed the following:
1. The agenda cover page from the Southwest Commission meeting
describing the name change requirements.
2. The Resolution recommending approval of the requested name change
adopted by the Commission on April 4, 1990.
3. An Acknowledgement and Consent form executed by KBL Cablesystems of
the Southwest, Inc., and its parent companies.
4. A Resolution for adoption by your city council.
5. An Ordinance Amendment to be adopted by your City.
Will you kindly have these matters placed on your city council agenda for
approval and adoption at the earliest opportune_ time. Kindly have your city
clerk send us two certified copies of both the Resolution and Ordinance after
adoption. We will send one certified copy of each document to Paragon, file
one copy of each document in the Commission files on your City's behalf, and
arrange for the completion of all requirements related to this matter.
Please call me if you have any questions.
Very truly yours,
C�-U�-L
Adrian E. Herbst
225ZKJD
Enclosures
cc: Debra Cottone
Ann Mathews
Cities of Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, Minnetonka & Richfield
SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION
AGENDA ITEM NO. I
Description Initiated By Date
Company Name Change Paragon March 26, 1990
Rogers Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. ( "RCTSI ") desires to change its
corporate name to KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. ( "KBLCSI ") and has
requested the approval of the name change by the Southwest Suburban Cable Com-
mission("SWSCC") and its Member Cities. RCTSI does not intend to make any
changes to its corporate structure or to the control of its operations, but
simply desires to change its name.
Given that RCTSI intends only to change its name and not its corporate
structure, this matter can be handled by the Member Cities by resolution without
all of the formal transfer documents usually required in connection with a
transfer request. As long as KBLCSI and its parent companies acknowledge that
KBLCSI is the corporate successor of RCTSI, and the parent companies reaffirm
their status as guarantors of KBLCSI's obligations under the Franchise, the
Member Cities can proceed to approve RCTSI's request.
Accordingly, counsel for SWSCC has prepared a resolution for adoption by
the Commission recommending approval of the request for a name change and also
has prepared a model Resolution and model Ordinance for use by the Member Cities
in approving the name change should they decide to do so.
The Commission should note that the Franchise and the relevant closing
documents relating to the recent transfer of ownership from the Rogers Commu-
nication group to KBLCOM Incorporated ( "KBLCOM ") provide that the Franchise and
the related documents shall be binding on the successor in interest of RCTSI.
Accordingly, counsel for the Commission has prepared an Acknowledgement and
Consent form pursuant to which I(BLCSI's parent companies, KBLCOM and KBL Cable,
Inc. ( "KBLC "), acknowledge that KBLCSI is the corporate successor to RCTSI. The
document also reaffirms KBLCOM's and KBLC's status as guarantors of KBLCSI's
rights and obligations under the Franchise and the agreements related thereto.
The Operating Committee reviewed this matter and all supporting documents
at its meeting of March 22, 1990.
RECOMMENDATION
The Operating Committee recommends that the Commission adopt the attached
Resolution approving the change of the name of the Grantee under the Franchise
from Rogers Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. to KBL Cablesystems of the
Southwest, Inc., provided KBLC, KBLCOM, and KBLCSI first execute and deliver to
each Member City an Acknowledgement and Consent in a form satisfactory to each
Member City. The request for approval of the name change should then be
presented to each Member City-for action.
APPROVED
-2-
DENIED
N
n Vf'1 T TTTTnAl
RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF NAME
CHANGE FROM ROGERS CABLESYSTEMS OF THE
SOUTHWEST, INC. TO KBL CABLESYSTEMS OF THE
SOUTHWEST, INC.
WHEREAS, Rogers Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc: ( "RCTSI ") is the
current grantee under the cable communication franchises granted pursuant to the
cable communication ordinances (collectively, the "Franchises ") of the Cities of
Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, Minnetonka, and Richfield, Minnesota ( "Member
Cities "); and
WHEREAS, RCTSI desires to change its name to KBL Cablesystems of the
Southwest; Inc., d /b /a Paragon Cable ( "KBLCSI ") and has requested the Southwest
Suburban Cable Commission ( "SWSCC ") and its Member Cities to the approve the
name change; and
WHEREAS, RCTSI does not intend to make any changes to its ownership struc-
ture or to the control of its operations, but desires only to change its, name;
and
WHEREAS, .KBL Cable, Inc. ( "KBLC ") and KBLCOM Incorporated ( "KBLCOM ") are
the guarantors of RCTSI's obligations under the Franchises pursuant to a Consent
Agreement and Guaranty of Performance given to each Member City; and
WHEREAS, the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission ( "SWSCC ") has reviewed the
re-:.uest for approval of RCTSI's name change and has found no reason to disap-
prove of the request, provided that KBLC, KBLCOM, and KBLCSI acknowledge and
agree in a writing acceptable to the Member Cities that'KBLCSI is the corporate
successor of RCTSI for all purposes under the Franchises and all agreements
related thereto, and further provided that KBLC and KBLCOM reaffirm their status
as guarantors of KBLCSI's obligations under the Franchises.
NOW, THEREFORE, at a regularly scheduled meeting of SWSCC, SWSCC resolves
as follows:
SWSCC hereby approves and recommends to the Member Cities that each of them
consent to and approve RCTSI's request for a name change to KBL Cablesystems of
the Southwest, Inc., d /b /a Paragon Cable, provided KBLC, KBLCOM, and KBLCSI
first execute and deliver to each Member City an Acknowledgement and Consent in
a form satisfactory to the Member Cities.
Dated this day of ' 1990.
SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION
By%��;::
Its'Chairpp, son
-2-
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND CONSENT
Parties:
KBL Cable, Inc., a Delaware corporation ( "KBLC ").
KBLCOM, Incorporated, a Texas corporation ( "KBLCOM ").
KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc., a Minnesota corporation d /b /a
Paragon Cable ( "KBLCSI ").
Effective Date:
March 20, 1990.
Recitals:
1. Rogers Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. ( "RCTSI ") , a wholly -owned
subsidiary of KBLC (which is a wholly -owned subsidiary of KBLCOM) , is the
current grantee under the cable communications ordinances (the "Franchises ") of
the Cities of Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, Minnetonka, and Richfield, Minnesota
(collectively, the "Cities ").
2. KBLC and KBLCOM are the corporate guarantors of RCTSI's obligations
under the Franchises pursuant to a Consent Agreement and Guaranty of Performance
between KBLC, KBLCOM, and each City ( "Guaranty ").
3. RCTSI desires to change its name to KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest,
Inc. and has requested the approval of each City to do so.
4. The Cities are willing to consent to the name change, provided KBLC,
KBLCOM and KBLCSI acknowledge in writing that KBLCSI is the successor of RCTSI
for all purposes related to the Franchises and that the Guaranty shall remain in
full force and effect.
Acknowledgement and Agreements:
1. KBLC, KBLCOM, and KBLCSI hereby acknowledge and agree that KBLCSI is
the successor in interest to RCTSI for all purposes under the Franchises and the
Guaranty (including the Guaranteed Documents as defined in the Guaranty).
2. KBLC, KBLCOM, and KBLCSI represent and warrant to the Cities that
RCTSI intends only to change its corporate name to KBL Cablesystems of the
Southwest, Inc., and that no changes in the ownership or control of RCTSI will
occur as a result of this name change.
3. KBLC and KBLCOM acknowledge and agree that they remain fully bound
under the Guaranty as guarantors of KBLCSI's obligations under the Franchises
and the Guaranteed Documents (as defined in the Guaranty). KBLC and KBLCOM
hereby waive any defenses to the enforcement of the Guaranty based on RCTSI's
change of its name to KBLCSI.
KBL CABLE, INC.
By
Its ice President, Sgkretary
reasurer
KBLCOM INCORPORATED
By
Its Vice President, tary
Treasurer IV
KBL CABLESYSTEMS OF THE
SOUTHWEST, INC.
By
Its Vice President, re ary
reasurer
-2-
CITY OF EDINA
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL' TO A CHANGE OF NAME OF
GRANTEE FROM ROGERS CABLESYSTEMS OF THE SOUTHWEST,
INC. TO KBL CABLESYSTEMS OF THE SOUTHWEST," INC.
D /B /A PARAGON CABLE
WHEREAS, Rogers Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. ("RCTSI ") is the
current grantee under the cable communications ordinance ( "Franchise ") of the
City of Edina, Minnesota ( "City "); and
WHEREAS, RCTSI desires to change its corporate name to KBL Cablesystems of
the Southwest, Inc., d /b /a Paragon Cable ( "KBLCSI ") and has requested the City's
approval of the name change; and
WHEREAS, RCTSI does not intend to make any changes to its ownership struc-
ture or to the control of its operations, but desires only to change its name;
and
- WHEREAS, KBL Cable, Inc. ( "KBLC ") and KBLCOM Incorporated ( "KBLCOM ") are
the guarantors of RCTSI's obligations.under the Franchise pursuant to a Consent
Agreement and Guaranty of Performance given to the City; and
WHEREAS, the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission ( "SWSCC ") reviewed the
request for approval of RCTSI's name change and found no reason to disapprove of
the request, provided KBLC, KBLCOM, and KBLCSI first acknowledge and agree in a
writing acceptable to SWSCC's member cities that KBLCSI is the corporate suc-
cessor of RCTSI for all purposes under the Franchise and that KBLC and KBLCOM
reaffirm their status as guarantors of KBLCSI's obligations under the Franchise;
and
WHEREAS, the City joins in the foregoing findings of SWSCC.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. The City hereby consents to and approves the change of the name of the
grantee under the Franchise from Rogers Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. to
KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc., d /b /a Paragon Cable, provided KBLCOM
Incorporated, KBL Cable, Inc., and KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. first
file with the City an Acknowledgement and Consent in a form and substance
acceptable to the City.
2. The City declares-that as of the time of this Resolution, the Fran-
chase and all agreements entered into by RCTSI in connection therewith shall
remain in full force and effect, except that KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest,
Inc. shall be deemed to have been substituted as grantee and shall be obligated
as RCTSI's successor in interest to perform all of RCTSI's duties and obliga-
tions thereunder.
Passed and adopted this day of
Edina.
Attest:
City Clerk
-2-
, 1990, by the City of
CITY OF EDINA
By
Its
OPDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1120
TO CHANGE THE NAME OF GRANTEE
THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, DOES ORDAIN:
SECTION 1. That Article I, Section 2, Paragraph J of said Ordinance be
-- amended to read as follows:
J. "Grantee" is Rages- 6a��esyseffis- e- e- fieei�we9e;
1-tte- KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc., a Minnesota
corporation, d /b /a Paragon Cable.
SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon adoption
and publication, provided that it shall become effective only if all of the
Cities of Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, Minnetonka and Richfield adopt an
ordinance similar to this Ordinance within sixty (60) days after the adoption of
this Ordinance.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Published in the Edina Sun - Current on
ATTEST:
City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )ss.
CITY OF EDINA )
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
By
Its Mayor
By
Its Manager
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of
Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance is a true and
correct copy of the Ordinance duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its
Regular Meeting of 1990, and as recorded in the Minutes of
said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of
1990.
City Clerk
RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL TO A CHANGE OF NAME OF
GRANTEE FROM ROGERS CABLESYSTEMS OF THE SOUTHWEST, INC.
TO KBL CABLESYSTEMS OF THE SOUTHWEST, INC. D /B /A PARAGON CABLE
WHEREAS, Rogers Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. ( "RCTSI ") is the current
grantee under the cable communications ordinance ( "Franchise ") of the City of
Edina, Minnesota ( "City "); and
WHEREAS, RCTSI desires to change its corporate name to KBL Cablesystems of the
Southwest, Inc., c/b /a Paragon Cable ( "KBLCSI ") and has requested the City's
approval of the name change; and
WHEREAS, RCTSI does not intend to make any changes to its ownership structure or to
the control of its operations, but desires only to change its name; and
WHEREAS, KBL Cable, Inc ( "KBLC ") and KBLCOM Incorporated ( "KBLCOM ") are the
guarantors of RCTSI's obligations under the Franchise pursuant to a Consent
Agreement and Guaranty of Performance given to the City; and
WHEREAS, the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission ( "SWSCC ") reviewed the request
for approval of RCTSI's name change and found no reason to disapprove of the
request, provided KBLC, KBLCOM, and KBLCSI first acknowledge and agree in a
writing acceptable to SWSCC's member cities that KBLCSI is the corporate successor
of RCTSI for all purposes under the Franchise and that KBLC and KBLCOM reaffirm
their status as guarantors of KBLCSI's obligations under the Franchise; and
WHEREAS, the City joins in the foregoing findings of SWSCC.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. The city hereby consents to and approves the change of the name of the
grantee under the Franchise from Rogers Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. to KBL
Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc., d /b /a/ Paragon Cable, provided KBLCOM
Incorporated, KBL Cable, Inc., and KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. first
file with the City an Acknowledgement and Consent in a form and substance
acceptable to the City.
2. The City declares that as of the time of this Resolution, the Franchise and
all agreements entered into by RCTSI in connection therewith shall remain in full
force and effect, except that KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. shall be
deemed to have been substituted as grantee and shall be obligated as RCTSI's
successor in interest to perform all of RCTSI's duties and obligations thereunder.
Passed and adopted this 7th day of May, 1990, by the City of Edina.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
ATTEST: By
Its Mayor
City Clerk
i
t � A
i O
ixea
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From. Francis Hoffman
City Engineer
Date. 7 May, 1990
Subject: Attached Minneapolis
Request
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
lX.B.
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
E
To Council
Action
0
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Defer until May 21st Council Meeting.
Info /Background:
Attached is a letter from Minneapolis requesting support on
a funding proposal to study risks of contamination of the
Upper Mississippi River. Staff is also aware of an additional
study about alternative water supply which should be discussed
with Council prior to the passing of a resolution.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS OFFICE
'H',." C _'(-ALL
\11NNEAPO_ S, 'v'% X5415
1612, 318 -7552
Kenneth Rosland, \tanager
City,- of Edina
4801 t}. 50th Street
cii ia, �1N ,5 4 2
Dear Mr. Rosland:
EXHIBIT A
am o��R�po �o�
�a�� ofd kb'?
April 16, 1990
The City of Minneapolis recently submitted an application to the
Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources to conduct a study
w hich will assess the risks of contamination of the Upper
Mississippi River. The Study, if funded, would begin in 1991 and
be conducted over a two -yeas time period. .attached is a summary of
the entire proposal.
The decision on funding will probable be made in late summer of
1990. As a part of this application, the City- is seeking the
support of the cities which currently are served by the Minneapolis
Seater Worts. Also attached is a sample resolution which could be
considered by your city council.
Tf �'ou have any questions, please give me a call at 673 -2039.
Sincerely,
William Barnhart
Government Relations
Representative
AFFIRMATIVE ACTON EVPLOVER
-- YIVOICE 16121 348 -2151
SAMPLE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS: The Mississippi River is the primary source of water for
approximately 900,000 people in the Twin C'it.ies
Metropolitan Area; and
WHEREAS: The NMetropoiitan Council in recent reports has
recommended decreased reliance on ground water and
continued utilization of surface water; and
WHEREAS: There is currently- no comprehensive watershed protection
program for the Upper Mississippi; and
WHEREAS: The City- of Minneapolis has submitted an application to
the Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources to
determine potential sources of contamination for the
Upper Mississippi River, estimate the liklihood of severe
contamination incidents, and identify strategies to
reduce the level of risk; and
WHEREAS: The City- of Edina is served by the ^Minneapolis Water
Works;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDINA THAT:
The City of Edina endorses the application of the C'it.v of
Minneapolis to the Legislative Commission on Minnesota
Resources to assess the risk of contamination of the
Upper Mississippi River and urges that the project be
funded.
1991 LCMR Funding Proposal
PROGRAM TITLE: Assessment of the Risks of'Contamination of the Upper Mississippi
Biennial Program J.F. Hayek, P.E.; Director
Total: 5500,000 Manager: Minneapolis Water Works
205 South 4th Street Minneapolis MN 55415
Minneapolis MN 55415 ?H: 612- 673 -2418
I. narrative. Chemical, biological, or radiological contamination of the Upper
Mississippi River could jeopardize drinking water supplies and the river ecology. This
project would determine the potential sources of contamination, estimate the likelihood of
severe contamination incidents. and identify strategies to reduce the level of risk.
II. Objectives
A. Inventory of Contaminant Sources in the Upper Mississippi River Basin.
1. Narrative. The inventory will produce a document identifying potential contaminant
sources by location, degree of toxicity, quantity, and mode of entry to the river.
2. Amount budgeted for the objective. $200,000
3. Product timeline. Starting Date is July 1, 1991.
a. Review of report on literature review, analysis of previous incidents, and
development of survey scope and procedures. August 1991.
b. Field survey and data collection. August 1991 to July,1992.
Quarterly reports due in October 1991; January 1992; and April 1992.
c. Review of Final Survey Report. July, 1992.
4. Benefits. (1)The development of baseline contamination data. (2)Data would also be
shared with other researchers and agencies.
B. Impact of Contamination of the Mississippi River.
1. Narrative. The impact analysis will (a) develop contamination scenarios based on
field data for various flow rates and locations; 4b) estimate the extent and duration of
each scenario and the impact on water treatment; and (c) determine the relative
likelihood of the identified scenarios occurring.
2. Amount budgeted for this objective. $190,000
3. Product timeline. Start date is July, 1991.
a. Report on literature survey and proposed analysis. October 1991
b. Interim report on analysis of field data. January 1992.
c. Summary report on all field data. October 1992.
4. Benefits. (1)The determination of the most serious contamination problems requiring
priority emergency planning and mitigation strategies. (2)The development of innovative
computer modeling techniques.
C. Emergencv Planning and Mitigation Analysis.
1. Narrative. This research and interagency coordination effort will (a) develop
mitigation alternatives (improved detection and warning, rerouting of hazardous
materials, drainage control, changes in water treatment procedures or capacity) and. (b)
determine the impact of mitigation strategies on risk reduction (cost- benefit analysis).
2. Amount budgeted. $110.000
3. Product timeline. Start date is June 1992.
a. Interim report on research and proposed methodology. August 1992.
b. Final mitigation report. June 1993.
Quarterly reports due October 1992; January 1993: and April 1993.
4. Benefits. ;:)The basis for recommendations for actions by local ard'state agencies.
(2)Development of multi- agency education and.collaborationc._
III. Context.
IMPACT
o Approximately 900,000 people in the metropolitan area and 50,000 people in St. Cloud rely
entirely or substantially on the Mississippi for their drinking water.
o Twenty -two communities in the state rely on surface waters other than the Mississippi to
meet their drinking water needs. This project could be replicated to manage the risks to
their water supplies.
o There is currently no comprehensive watershed protection program for the Upper
Mississippi.
o The Metropolitan Council in their report on metro water planning recommended decreased
reliance on ground water and increased use of surface water. Preventing degradation of
river quality would become even more important.
COORDINATION AND FUNDING
o Representatives of the following agencies have endorsed the need for this project and
have agreed to provide research support: the Upper Mississippi Headwaters Board, the
Freshwater Foundation, the U.S. Corps of Engineers. MPCA, MDNR, Metropolitan Council,
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, St. Cloud Water Works, and St. Paul Water Utility.
o This project will make direct use of data from the Water Quality Monitoring Project of
the Upper Mississippi Headwaters Board and the LCMR- funded Land Use Update Project.
o Minneapolis has committed up to $65,000 in direct matching funds for this project. An
additional S400,000 .has been budgeted by the city for a parallel project to study
alternative water sources. Minneapolis is now seeking additional funding for the project
l
EXHIBIT B
ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLY INTERVIEWS
BL00MINGTON. EDINA, GOLDEN VALLEY, CRYSTAL,
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, HILLTOP. NEW HOPE
1. GENERAL PERCEPTIONS
A. Current View of Water Supply Issues
i. Surface water optimization
ii. Groundwater for peaking and emergency supply
iii. Regionalization
iv. Threats to groundwater quality
B. Suburban Dependency on Minneapolis Advantages /Disadvantages
i. Rates
ii. Administrative
iii. Political -
iv. Quality - implementation of safe water drinking act
regulations
V. Control
C. Existing Emergency Plans
D. Minneapolis Contingency Needs
i. Basic perceptions of need
ii. Threats to availability of water
iii. Impact on purchasing community (possible solutions to
problems)
a. water quality incident
b. drought
E. Development of Independent System
i. Replacement/base
ii. Emergency
0003090 /AWSI.WP /TMK 1
2. CHARACTERISTICS OF SYSTEM
A. Sources
i. In place wells /wellhead protection
ii. Supply studies
iii. Planned modifications
B. Interconnection
i. Minneapolis
ii. Adjacent surface water sources
iii. Adjacent groundwater sources
C. Design
i. Independent system layout
ii. Pressures
iii. System analysis
iv. Planned modifications
D. Storage
i. Existing
a. active
b. fire
ii. Planned
E. Treatment
i. Existing
ii. Planned
0003090 /AWSI.WP/TMK 2
3. HISTORIC USE
A. Demand Summaries
i. Annual
ii. Base
iii. Max day /month
iv. Per capita
B. User Class (billing records)
i. Residential
a. single
b. multiple
ii. Commercial
iii. Industrial
a. city supplied
b. independent supply
4. FUTURE DEMAND
A. Population
i. Existing
ii. Projections
iii. Saturation
B. Land Use
i. Existing
ii. Future development class /type
0003090 /AWSI.WP/TMK 3
Agenda Item IX.0
off
as ociation of
me�ropoIitan
municipalities
1990 AMM ANNUAL MEETING
WHEN: WEDNESDAY, MAY 16, 1990
WHERE: MC GUIRES INN '
1201 West County Road E
Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112
5:30 P.M. 6:30 P.M.
Social Hour Western Deluxe Buffet
(Cash Bar) (BBQ Ribs, Glazed Ham, and
Ranch Style Chicken, Western Potatoes,
salads and veggies,
dessert and more)
Cost: $20.00 Per Person
7.30 P.M.
Annual Business
Meeting
SPOUSES, SIGNIFICANT OTHERS, AND GUESTS ARE WELCOME
1. DINNER RESERVATIONS TO CAROL WILLIAMS (227 -4008) BY'
NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, MAY 11.
(Reservations are not needed if you only plan to attend the business
meeting portion - Please channel reservations through your city
Manager /Administrator office).
2. PLEASE COME AND PROVIDE YOUR INPUT AND REACTION TO THE ENCLOSED
MISSION AND MEMBERSHIP SERVICES TASK FORCE REPORT CONCERNING THE
FUTURE DIRECTION OF THE AMM.
SEE MAP AND MEETING AGENDA ON REVERSE
DISTRIBUTION NOTE: This notice has been mailed to Mayors,
Councilmembers and Managers /Administrators
individually.
183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227 -4008
BUSINESS MEETING AGENDA
1. Welcome To Arden Hills.
2. Recognize Retiring Officers and Board Directors.
3. Mission and Membership Services Report by Kevin Frazell,
Administrator, Cottage Grove.
4. President's Annual Report: Walt Fehst.
5. Annual Election of Officers and Directors.
A. Report of Nominating Committee - Gary Bastian, Past President.
B. Election (President, Vice - President and Directors).
6. Comments of the President Elect.
7. Legislative Report - WHAT HAPPENED ON MAJOR ISSUES.
8. Adjourn.
10 ARDEN MILLS
5
694
COUNTY ROAD E
O
65 a
5 51 =
B X
W
J
36
= 4s
8 J
W 35
MINNEAPOLIS =
N
94 12
35W ST. PAUL
v 494
52
1-6% to lzdVon Ave. bdt,'South V4 Mile.
Leadershi p!
Environment ,.
Schedule",
S_
ervices
•
1
{.
gig/' a
�
'
.;�r� , Y
y
Schedule",
1990 LMC Annual Conference Housing
Housing information Early Bird Special
SINGLE DOUBLE
For member city officials only. The Radisson Duluth, Holiday Inn
Radisson Hotel Duluth :.:.......................$60 $65 _
and Edgewater Motel will each provide one complimentary weekend
505 West Superior Street
for two at their facilities, excluding meals, as an early bird special
Holiday Inn Duluth .... ............................$62 $68
prize. Only delegates sending in their housing registration form by
207 West Superior Street
May 1. 1990 will be eligible. The winner must pay the room tax and
Park Inn Int ernational. ...........................$58 $58
all incidental charges.
250 Canal Park Drive
Edgewater Motels East & West. ............ $60 $60
Important Instructions
2211 London Road
Rooms will be- named on a first-come. fast - served basis. The
Edgewater Motels Atrium .....................$75 $75
earlier you make your reservations, the better the chance you will
2330 London Road , •
have of geeing your fast choice hotel. The hotels will hold the room
Fitger's Inn ............ .............................. $85 $85
block until May 29, 1990, after which regular room rates will be in
600 East Superior Street =
effect if available.
Downtown Best We stern ......................$35 $47
131 West 2nd Street
A d 't ual to one ni 's lodging
�t � � gmg Per room must accompany this
College of St. Schobodi a .:..................$23.50 $15.85/person
housing form.
1200 Kenwood gvegnQ?
NOTE: The SL.Scholastim has agr6ed to provide•two
CREDIT CARD PREFERRED.,
wings of 20 sleeplrig't►pns each for our attendees. The College will
' "�MC�CKS PAYABLE TO LMC HOUSING BUREAU.
furnish bed IiaenC'btit nct maid service. Towels are exchanged dai>jr.
12 percent sales iax will be added to the above rates. Cities are not ,
You will receive an acknowledgement of your reservation from the
-
exempt from paying sales tax on sleeping rooms.
assigned hotel.
NOTE: The Radisson Hotel Duluth is the headquarters hotel
All changes In reservations or cancellations must be made
through the Housing Bureau in writing.
Housing Reservation
(please print or type)
Name: Title
City or Organization:
City: State: Zip:
Arrival Date: Arrival Time: Departure Date:
Hotel Preference
First: Second:
Special Requirements:
Names of All Occupants:
Do you wish to guarantee payment for arrival after 6:00 p.m?
Yes No
Enclosed is a deposit equal to one night's lodging
per room.
MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO
LMC HOUSING BUREAU
League of Minnesota Cities
Housing Bureau
Duluth Convention Bureau & Visitors Bureau
100 Lake Place Drive
Duluth, MN 55802
Attn: Lauri O'Connor
Credit Card Preferred
Credit Card Company
Card Number
Expiration Date
The LMC Housing Bureau is authorized to use the above card
to guarantee my hotel reservations reserved by me. I under-
stand that one night's room will be billed through this card if
I fail to show up for my assigned housing on the confirmed
date unless I have cancelled my reservations with the hotel
prior to 6:00 p.m. on the day of arrival.
Cardholder signature Date
Retain a copy of this form for your records. If you do not receive a confirmation from the hotel within two weeks, contact Lauri
O'Connor at (218) 722 -4011.
Please type or print
Name
Nickname for badge
Title
City or organization
Mailing address
City
Telephone (
1990 Annual Conference Registration
State
Sex F M
Zip
Family members attending (No registration fee BUT DOES NOT INCLUDE
MEAL TICKETS. ORDER BELOW)
Spouse full name Sex
Child Age
Child Age
F M
This is my first League of Minnesota Cities Annual Conference.
FULL CONFERENCE
June 12- 15,1990_
Registration includes a on to
all sessions and tickets f�ednes-
day exhibitor's luncheon., %'4da '
(uncheon.;Thursday banq!ei;ind �-
Friday cofree and rolls. • ;`
MINI - CONFERENCE.
June 14, 1990 `' '
Registration.includes;adoiissiou tw.
all Thursday sessions; Mayoeq 0. .
luncheon and eofr*e , i3S N(Yr
include thejbiitsday qq �
Order .tickets= for, the `6aingttet l(ow:
Early Registration (Postmarked by May 15, 1990)
$155 Full Conference S
S65 Mini - Conference S
Advance Registration (Postmarked by May 30, 1990)
$180 Full Conference $
$75 Mini - Conference S
On -Site Registration (at Conference)
$195 Full Conference $
S85 Mini- Conference S
Extra Meal Tickets
* $5.00 Tuesday Evening Fish Boil S
S11 Wednesday Exhibitor's Lunch S
$I1 Thursday Mayor's Luncheon S
$23 Thursday Banquet S
* See the program in the April issue of Minnesota Cities. for details of Tuesday
Evening's Special Kick -Off at Glensheen Mansion.
City contact Daytime phone #_
a.c
Feel free to duplicate for multiple registrations.
I. General Information
Every delegate, guest, speaker. media
representative, and other attendees
MUST REGISTER with this form.
Complete the form in full and return it
along with full payment of all appro-
priate conference registration fee to
address indicated
NOTE: No registration will be proc-
essed without payment in full, or with-
out an accompanying city voucher or
purchase order.
IL- Conference Registration-Dead-
lines
May 15, 1990: Final postmark dead-
line for Early Registration.
May 30, 1990: Final postmark dead-
line for Advance Registration. z
III. Conference kewg' tcatlon
letLerofrtr$islatiogeanctaion
iatlst W. `� amlateraban May
30,:1990 o qualify fora refund of reg-
istration fees:
A registration cancellation is subject
to a $10 cancellation fee.
IV. Special Needs:-
If you are disabled and require special
services, or if you have special dietary
needs, Please attach .a written descrip-
tion.
V. Registration Confirmation
Pre - registrants will receive'a postcard
iclmowledgement� to be presented at
the ADVANCE REGISTRATION desk
for quick registration.
VI. For more information
For more information contact:Cathy
Dovidio (612) 227 -5600.
Make check payable and return with
form to League of Minnesota Cities,
183 University Avenue East
St. Paul, MN 55101.
LMC Annual Conference
Quality: Leadership, Service, Environment
Effective Education for Cities
Preliminary Program Schedule
Tuesday, June 12, 1990 Thursday, June 14, 1990
Tuesday Night Kick -off. Special Evening Planned Concurrent Session IV (choose one)
at Glensheen Mansion 9:00 a.m. -10:30 a.m.
6:30 p.m.
Wednesday, June 13, 1990
Welcome/Opening Session
Quality Service: A priority for Minnesota cities
9:00 a.m. -10:15 a.m.
Alfred A. Checchi, Chairman, Northwest Airlines
Concurrent Session I (choose one)
10:30 a.m. -11:45 a.m.
0 Defining Roles Between Council and Manager /Administrator
0 Role of Consultant/Consultant Responsibilities
j Disposing of Our Waste: Recycling Approaches and Issues
,T Economic Development Thru Creative Collaboration
Exhibitors' lunch
11:45 a.m. -1:15 p.m.
General Session
A Drug Policy for Minnesota
1:15 p.m. -2:15 p.m.
Jan Smaby, Director, Office of Drug Policy
Concurrent Session n (choose one)
2:30 p.m. - 3:30 p.m.
Elected Officials: How to Keep Informed
Improving Customer Service
Waste Processing Alternatives: Landfills, Burning, Composting
7 Addressing Changing Demographics/ Using Census Data
Concurrent Session III:
LMC Policy Committees (choose one)
3:45 p.m. -5:00 p.m.
Development Strategies Committee
General Legislation and Personnel Committee
Elections and Ethics Committee
Revenue Sources Committee
Land Use, Environment, Energy, Transportation Committee
City night
Cocktail reception on William S. Irving, followed by an evening of
food, entertainment, carriage rides, and more
6:30 p.m.
Administrator /Manager Performance Assessment
Ethics
Hazardous Materials and the City
V Survival of Small Cities: Part I
Concurrent Session V (choose one)
10:45 a.m.- 12:15. p.m.
0 Budgeting for the Future: Meeting Revenue Needs in the 90's
- Employee Performance Appraisal
Water Quality Issues
V Survival of Small Cities: Part II
Mayors Association/Mini Conference Luncheon
12:30 p.m. -2:00 p.m.
Bob Bolen, NLC President, Mayor, Fort Worth, Texas
Concurrent Session VI (choose one)
2:15 p.m. -3:30 p.m.
Current Issues (LMCIT)
V Drug Testing Policies and Administration
Meeting Future Transportation Needs for Minnesota
V Annexation and Related Issues for Small Cities
League Annual Meeting
3:45 p.m.
LMC Reception and Banquet
6:30 p.m.
Friday, June 15, 1990
Finale General Session
Leadership, Power and Productivity: Doing Well by
Doing Good
9:30 a.m.
Layne Longfellow
Keys
Quality Leadership
Quality Services
Fnvironmental Quality
'° Quality of Community Life
- Quality of Community Life/Small Cities
- Quality Personnel
\V
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
124J74
04/24/90
N x N N N N
127701
04/24/90
127702
04/24/90
127703
04/24/90
127704
04/24/90
127705
04/24/90
127706
04/24/90
127707
04/24/90
127708
04/2/90
127709
04/24/90
127,710
04/4/90
127710
04/24/90
127711
04/24/90
127712
04/24/90
127713
04/24/90
127714
04/24/90
127715
04/24/90
127716
04/24/90
xxNNxx
CHECK REGISTER
05 -07 -90
PAGE 1
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
#
MESSAGE
21.20.
JUSTUS LUMBER
DRYWELL /JOINT TAPE
10- 4540 - 520 -52
30272
6543
21.20
*
* ** -CKS
6.30
PEGS STATIONERS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 420 742
6.30
*
90.00
HUTCHINSON ELECT
CABLE /PHOTO SUPPLIES
12- 4508 - 434 -43
38
90.00
*
964.69
KENNY BOILER MFG CO
REPAIR BOILER
10- 4248 - 520 -52
73017
6940
964.69
*
200.00
ELIZABETH BERGMAN
REFUND
30- 3507 - 000 -00
200.00
*
200.00
PAUL VANFOSSAN
REFUND
30- 3507 - 000 -00
200.00
*
165.10
WATER SPECIALTY CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 783 -78
1241
7126
165.10
*
130.50
LYNDE GREENHOUSE
TREES /FLOWERS /SHRUBS
30- 4660 - 782 -78
18709
7125
130.50
*
8.00
ACTION MESSENGER INC
POSTAGE
30- 4290 - 781 -78
87203
7123
8.00
*
49.J0
DENISON MAILING SERV
MAILING SERV
10- 4201 - 200 -20
49'.00
*
180.00
MN SAFETY COUNCIL
SERVICES
10- 4202 - 280 -28
28509
6871
90.00
MN SAFETY COUNCIL
SERVICES
10- 4202 - 420 -42
28509
6871
270.00
*
118.78
METRO ELECTRIC
ELECTRIC REPAIR
10- 4248 - 440 -44
12197
6698
118.78
75.00
FIGURE SKATING CLUB
ARENA PROGRAMS
10- 4504 - 627 -62
7040
75.00
*
87.26
GROTH MUSIC
MUSIC
10- 4596 - 627 -62
7041
87.26
*
53,044.00
EARL WEIKLE /SONS
AC REMODEL
23- 1300 - 001 -00
53,044.00
*
60.50
AXNER CO INC
COST /GOODS SOLD
23- 4624 - 613 -61
3907
6666
60.50
*
75.00
NEW N ARTSCAPE
ADVERTISING
23- 4214 - 611 -61
6907
75.00
*
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
127719
04/24/90
294.15
GOPHER HGT /SHEET MET
REPAIRS
294.15
*
127720
04/24/90
100.00
EASYBAR OF MN INC
BAR REPAIRS
100.00
*
127721
04/24/90
230.32
LAKEVILLE MTR EXPRES
FREIGHT
230.32
*
127722
04/24/90
110.00
KEN SEVERUD
REIMBURSEMENT
110.00
*
127723
04/14/90
160.00
MN LICENSED BEV ASSO
TRAINING
127723
04/24/90
160.00
MN LICENSED BEV ASSO
TRAINING
127723
04/24/90
.155.00
MN LICENSED BEV ASSO
TRAINING
475.00
*
127724
04/24/90
24.00
CATHY CHAVEZ
REFUND
24.00
*
127725
04/27;90
960.00-
BOY SCOUTS OF AM
CONFERENCE
127725
04/24/90
960.00
BOY SCOUTS OF AM
NATIONAL CONFERENCE
.00 *
127726
04/24/90
29.27
STANLEY OLSON
REFUND
29.27
*
127727
04/24/90
58.80
PETER ROWLAND
REFUND
58.80
*
127728
04/24/90
668.11
NASCO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
668.11
*
127729
04/24/90
945.00
NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGN
SIGN BLANKS
945.00
*
127730
04/24/90
385.00
SPECIALIZED GRAPHICS
DOOR HANGERS
385.00
*
127731
04/24/90
180.00
MASON CUTTERS
FLOOR HOLES
180.00
*
127732
04/24/90
253.40
NS CONCRETE COMPANY
STORM SEWER PIPES
253.40
*
127733
04/24/90
325.00
FILTRA TECH SYSTEM
GENERAL SUPPLIES
325.00
*
127734
05/01/90
272.30
NEAL BROTEN SPORTS
LAUNDRY /UNIFORMS
127734
04/24/90
497.40
NEAL BROTEN SPORTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
769.70
*
127735
04/24/90
449.88
DIESEL INJECTN SPE
EXCHANGE NOZZLES
127735
04/24/90
753.10
DIESEL INJECTN SPE
REPAIR PARTS
r
0
05 -07 -90 PAGE 2
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
27- 4248 - 662 -66 1590 7063
27- 4248 - 662 -66 90032 3596
27- 1300 - 005 -00 7191
27- 3375- 667 -66
50- 4202 - 620 -82 41390 7064
50- 4202 - 840 -84 41390 7064
50- 4202 - 860 -86 41390 7064
10- 1145 - 000 -00
10- 4202 - 430 -42
10- 4202 - 430 -42
40- 3800 - 000 -00
40- 3800 - 000 -00
10- 4504 - 482 -48 334432 6618
10- 4542 - 325 -30 25963 6481
40- 4248 - 803 -80 1920 7102
40- 4540 - 801 -80 211731 6696
41- 4550 - 900 -90 160810 6994
40- 4504 - 801 -80 8285 6790
28- 4262 - 703 -70 28710S 6965
28- 4504 - 702 -70 6215
10- 4540 - 560 -56 8957 5929-
10- 4540 - 560 -56 9111 6984
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
05 -07 -90 PAGE 3
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
127735
04/24/90
80.00
DIESEL INJECTN SPE
CALIBRATION
10- 4540 - 560 -56
8779 5929
1,282.98
*
127736
04/24/90
25.00
MORRELL TRANSFER INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 301 -30
125148
25.00
*
127737
04/24/90
43.15
SILVER LAKE
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
4105 5305
43.15
*
127738
04/24/90
25.00
BOB CONNOLLY
PERFOMANCE
30- 4224 - 781 -78
25.00
*
127739
04/24;90
25.00
PHYLLIS HAWYA
PERFOMANCE
30- 4224 - 781 -78
25.00
*
127740
04/24/90
25.00
MARIAN ALSTAD
PERFOMANCE
30- 4224 - 781 -78
25.00
*
127741
04/24/90
25.00
KEN GRINDELAND
PERFOMANCE
30- 4224 - 781 -78
25.00
*
127742
04/24/90
30.00
JUDY LIEBER
PERFORMANCE
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30.00
*
127743
04/24/90
25.00
PAT MENEELY
PERFORMANCE
30- 4224 - 781-78
25.00
*
127744
04/24/90
25.00
MARIAN ALSTAD
PERFORMANCE
30- 4224 - 781 -78
25.00
*
127745
04/24/90
80.00
JAMES TOENSING
PERFORMANCE
30- 4224 - 781 -78
80.00
*
127746
04/24/90
25,.00
MARGARET GUST
PERFORMANCE
30- 4224 - 781 -78
25.00
*
127747
04/24/90
25.00
AGNES FINE
PERFORMANCE
30- 4224 - 781 -78
25.00
*
127748
04/24/90
25.00
BOB CONNOLLY
PERFORMANCE
30- 4224 - 781 -78
25.00
*
127749
04/24/90
40.00
WEST STAR PACKAGE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 507 -50
705164 7033
40.00
*
* * * * **
* * * -CKS
127751
04/24/90
39.50
SLIDE LOCK TOOL CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 420 -42
39.50
*.
127752
04/24/90
.50.00
KEVIN ROFIDAL
MEETING EXPENSES
10- 4206 - 430 -42
50.00
*
127753
04/24/90
62.16
AMERICANA INN
CONT ED
10- 4202 - 420 -42
68022
62.16
*
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
05 -07 -90 PAGE
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
# MESSAGE
127754
04/24/90
45.00
CELLULAR ONE SALES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42
6774
45.00
127755
04/24/90
16.95
POLCE MARKSMAN ASSN
DUES /SUBSCRIPTION
10- 4204 - 420 -42
16.95
127756
04/24/90
27.00
TC DICTATION SERV
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42
14818
7121
27.00
*
127757
04/24/90
I 190.00
N MEMORIAL MED CTR
CONT ED
10-4202- 420 -42
190.00
*
127758
04/24/90
255.00
G &J PATCH /PIN
UNIFORMS
10- 4266 - 420 -42
1581
6237
255.00
*
127759
04/24/90
15.00
NATL REGISTRY
TRAINING
10- 4202 - 420 -42
15.00
*
127760
04/24/90
470.00
BROADCAST MUSIC INC
LICENSE FEE
30- 4204 - 781 -78,
470.00
*
127761
04/24/90
200.00
MARK FOSSUM
SERVICES
27- 4288 - 664 -66
200.00
*
127762
04/24/90
71.54
MPLS SPOKESMAN
ADVERTISING
29- 4600 - 721 -72
5463
7215
71.54
*
127763
04/24/90
255.00
ELIZABETH COX
AMBULANCE REFUND
10- 3180 - 000 -00
255.00
*
127764
04/24/90
355.00
JOYCE BECHIK
AMBULANCE REFUND
10- 3180 - 000 -00
355.00
*
127765
04/24/90
20.00
HUSAM KHALIL
REFUND
30- 3505 - 000 -00
20.00
*
- 127766
04/24/90
42.70
EDINA LIQUOR
DINNER MEETING
10- 4206 - 100 -10
127766
04/24/90
52.94
EDINA LIQUOR
VOLUNTEER RECPTN
10- 4500 - 500 -50
95.64
*
-
127767
04/24/90
232.54
MN PREVEN REC CTR
BROCHURES
10- 4280 - 504 -50
7204
232.54
*
127768
04/24/90
79.74
DC SALES CO
AIR FILTERS
27- 4540- 667 -66
548314
7051
79.74
*
127769
04/24/90
331.99
DANIEL SMITH
COST /GOODS SOLD
23- 4624 - 613 -61
6904
127769
04/24/90
331.99-
DANIEL SMITH
COST /GOODS SOLD
23- 4624 - 613 -61
6904
127769
04/24/90
331.99
DANIEL SMITH
COST /GOODS SOLD
23- 4624 - 613 -61
6904
331.99
"
127770
05/01/90
62.00
CADY COMMUNICATION
TELEPHONE REPAIR
27- 4256- 662 -66
31746
7435
127770
04/24/90
938.00
CADY COMMUNICATION
TELEPHONE
27- 4256 - 662 -66
31729
6251
1,000.00
4
J'
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
127771
04/24/90
520.00
ABP MIDWEST INC
VOLUNTEER RECPTN
520.00
*
127772
04/24/90
100.00
STEVE SCHWIRTZ
GENERAL SUPPLIES
100.00
*
127773
04/24/90
100.00
EVERHOT MFG CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
127773
04/24/90
28.03
EVERHOT MFG CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
128.03
*
127774
04/24/90
170.00
SOUTHWESTERN
FIRE SCHOOL FEE
170.00
*
127775
04/24/90
31.90
ALEXANDER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
31.90
*
127776
04/24/90
358.80
TRIAD COMM
TRAINING PROGRAM
358.80
*
127777
04/24/90
488.40
JOANNA L FOOTE
TEMP EMPLOYEE
488.40
*
127778
04/24/90
16.66
VETERAN
ADVERTISING
- 127778
04/24/90
16.66
VETERAN
ADVERTISING
127778
04/24/90
16.68
VETERAN
ADVERTISING
50.00
*
127779
04/24/90
41.66
THE CHIEF OF POLICE
ADVERTISING
127779
04/24/90
41.68
THE CHIEF OF POLICE
ADVERTISING
127779
04/24/90
41.66
THE CHIEF OF POLICE
ADVERTISING
125.00
*
127780
04/24/90
50.00
TOM MULLIN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
50.00
*
.127781
04/24/90
36.22
FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL
DRUGS
36.22
*
127782
04/26/90
139.70
FRIDEN ALCATEL
FOLDER MAINT
139.70
*
127783
04/26/90
875.00
METRO FIRE EQUIP
HURST TOOL PARTS
875.00
*
127784
04/26/90
380.00
COLLEGE OF ST THOMAS
MGMT SEMINAR
380.00
*
127785
04/26/90
100.00
MN TRADITIONAL
PERFORMANCE
100.00
*
127786
04/26/90
75.00
VORPAL SWORD DANCE
PERFORMANCE
75.00
*
127787
04/26/90
100.00
SWINGN SQUARES
PERFORMANCE
05 -07 -90 PAGE
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4500 - 500 -50 531289 7212
30- 4504 - 782 -78 7298
30- 4504 - 782 -78 7299
30- 4504 - 782 -78 7299
10- 4202 - 440-44 6064
10- 4504 - 440 -44 2930 6063
10- 4608 - 440 -44 6065
12- 4120 - 434 -43 6914,
50- 4214 - 822 -82
50- 4214 - 842-84
50 -4214- 862 -86
50- 4214 - 822 -82
50- 4214 - 842 -84
50- 4214 - 862 -86
10- 4504- 600 -60
10- 4510 - 440 -44 286759
10- 4290 - 510 -51
10-4540- 440 -44 1531 6075
50- 4202 - 840 -84
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224- 781 -78
4"
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK N0. DATE
127788
127788
127789
127790
127791
127792
127793
127794
127795
127796
127796
127787
*** *.*
127799
127800
127801
127802
127803
127804
127805
04/26/90
04/30/90
04/26/90
04/26/90
04/26/90
04/26/90
04/26/90
04/26/90
04/26/90
04/26/90
04/30/90
04/26/90
04/30/90
04/30/90
04/30/90
04/"0/90
04/30/90
04/30/90
04/30/90
AMOUNT
100.00
*
1,020.00
1,620.00
2,640.00
*
120.80
120.80
*
- 39.61
39.61
*
25.00
25.00
*
30.73
30.73
*
123.95
123.95
*
25.00
25.00
*
15.00
15.00
*
9,789.00
14,892.00
24,681.00
*
2,019.82
2.019.82
*
75.00
75.00 *
190.00
190.00 *
750.00
750.00 *
150.00
150.00 *
438.50
438.50 *
104.95
104.95 *
25.00
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ROBERT A ELLER ASSO
ROBERT A ELLER ASSO
VALLEY VIEW ASSOC
STEVE STROH
MICHAEL SIITARI
JOY MALTBY
NATIONAL BUSINESS
A.T.O.M
STATE TREASURER
PERKINS LANDSCAPE
PERKINS LANDSCAPE
THE WAVE CAR WASHES
FRANK TOUGAS
COLLEGE OF ST THOMAS
EDINA COMMUNITY
LOTUS DEVELOPMENT
EM JOHNSON
BORLAND INTERNL
DONNA WALFSON
CONSTRUCTION
CONSTRUCTION
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CONT ED
TRAINING
CONT ED
CHAIRS
MEETING EXPENSES
LICENSE
CONSTRUCTION
CONSTRUCTION
CAR WASHES
PERFORMANCE
CONFERENCE
DOS CLASS
LOTUS 123
GENERAL SUPPLIES
QUATTRO PRO
REFUND
05 -07 -90 PAGE 6
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
27- 1300 - 004 -00
60- 1300 - 016 -20
30- 4504- 782 -78 6338
10- 4202 - 420 -42
10- 4202 - 420 -42
10- 4202 - 420 -42
10- 4901 - 510 -51
10- 4206 - 420 -42
40- 4202 - 809 -80
60- 1300 - 016 -20 6962
60 -1300- 016 -20 7134
10- 4296 - 560 -56 7294
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4202 - 781 -78 7895 7403
10- 4802 - 510 -51 5892
10- 4504 - 510 -51
27- 4504 - 664 -66 3766 7353
10- 4504 - 510 -51
10- 3500 - 000 -00
* * * -CKS
1990 CITY OF EDINA.
CHECK NO. DATE
04/30/90
04/30/90
04/30/90
04/30/90
04/30/90
,04/30/90
04/30/90
04/30/90
04/30/90
04/30/90
04/30/90
04/30/90
05/01/90
05/01/90
05/01/90
05/01/90
05/01/90
05/01/90
05/01/90
05/01/90
AMOUNT
25.00
39.40
39.40
*
35.31
35.31
*
34.83
34.83
*
35.31
35.31
*
90.00
90.00
*
504.00
504.00
*
124.25
124.25
*
302.78
302.78
*
25.00
50.43
75.43
*
45.90
45.90
*
30.00
30.00
*
198.00
198.00
*
200.00
200.00
*
53.00
53.00
*
48.17
48.17
575.00
575.00
52.50
52.50
52.50
157.50
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ANNE SMABEY
BERT WILLMORE
MARIA CREMER
GERALD CARLSON
IAFC
GENCORP POLYMER
SLOPE INDICATOR CO
AUSTIN HARDWARE
BOB KOJETIN
BOB KOJETIN
JOHN KEPRIOS
GREG POULTON
TC MUSICIANS UNION
ARC OF HENN CTY
PRENTICE HALL
MARIPOSA PUBLISHING
MICHAEL T HANSON
VFW POST #5555
VFW POST #5555
VFW POST #5555
REFUND
REFUND
REFUND
REFUND
DUES
TENNIS BALLS
REPAIR PARTS
PARTS
REGISTRATION
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
PERFORMANCE
REIMBURSEMENT
BOOKS
HANDBOOK
CONSULTANT SERV
ADVERTISING
ADVERTISING
ADVERTISING
05 -07 -90 PAGE 7
ACCOUNT NO. INV.. # P.O. # MESSAGE
40- 3800 - 000 -00
40- 3800 - 000 -00
40- 3800 - 000 -00
40- 3800 - 000 -00
10- 4204 - 440 -44
10- 4504 - 623 -62 44689 7211
40- 4540 - 801 -80 034658 7078
10- 4620 - 560 -56 82982 7084
10- 4202 - 600 -60
10- 4504 - 600 -60
10- 4504 - 600 -60
10- 4504- 627 -62
30- 4201 - 781 -78
30- 3507 - 000 -00
30- 4204 - 781 -78
10- 4502 - 140 -14 18313 7425
10- 4201 - 490 -49 5759 7421
50- 4214 - 822 -82 147919
50- 4214 - 842 -84 147919
50- 4214 - 862 -86 147919
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
127823
05/01/90
100.00
RICK ZACZEK
OPEN SPACE MAPS
100.00
*
127824
05/01/90
224.00
MIDWEST LANDSCAPING
TREE REPLACEMENT
224.00
*
127825
05/01/90
180.00
ROGER GRONLUND
EXHIBIT FEE
180.00
*
127826
05/01/90
100.00
PAT GREER
EXHIBIT FEE
100.00
*
127827
05/01/90
875.00
LINDA KOZAK
SERVICES
875.00
*
127828
05/01/90
50.00
DIANE RAINS
PERFORMANCE
50.00
*
127829
05/01/90
60.00
BECKY BROM
PERFORMANCE
60.00
*
127830
05/01/90
75.00
CHARLES LUMRICK
PERFORMANCE
75.00
*
127831
05/01/90
285.00
THE DESIGN GROUP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
285.00
*
127832
05/01/90
2.63
COUNTS MED EQUIP
MED SUPPLIES
127832
05/01/90
26.88
COUNTS MED EQUIP
MED SUPPLIES
29.51
*
127833
1 05/01/90
285.00
GRAFIX SHOPPE
LETTERING /BLAZER
285.00
*
127834
05/01/90
61.06
SYLVESTER SCHWARTZ
CONT ED
61.06
*
127835
05/01/90
75.00
N.T.O.A.
DUES
75.00
*
127836
05/01/90
50.00
AFFILIATED EM VET
PRO.SERV
50.00
*
127837
05/01/90
300.00
CITY OF ST PAUL
CONT ED
300.00
*
127838
05/01/90
127.50
AEC ENGINEERING
PRO SERV ENG
127838
05/01/90
172.80
AEC ENGINEERING
PRO SERV ENG
300.30
*
127839
05/01/90
41.70
EFS
FREIGHT
41.70
*
127840
05/01/90
105.84
•
SETON NAME. PLATE CO
ID STRIPS
05 -07 -90 PAGE
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4504 - 624 -62 7431
10- 4560- 644 -64 1692 7432
30- 3501 - 000 -00
30- 3501 - 000 -00
30- 4201 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4504 - 783 -78 1393 7317
10- 4510 - 440 -44 100635 5059
10- 4510 - 440 -44 102867 5059
10- 4248 - 440 -44 2771 6073 .
10- 4202 - 420 -42
10- 4204 - 420 -42
10- 4201 - 470 -47 208
10- 4202 - 420 -42 017614
40- 4201 - 800 -80
40- 4201 - 800 -80
27- 4516 - 661 -66 647895 5982
27- 4504 - 661 -66 6967
8
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
127841
05/01/90
127842
05/01/90
127843
05/01/90
127844
05/01/90
127845
05/01/90
127A01
04/24/90
127A01
04/24/90
127A01
04/24/90
127A01•
04/24/90
* * * * **
127Ai2
04/30/90
k * x k
127A16
04/24/90
127A19
04/30/90
127A19
04/30/90
127A19
04/30/90
* * * * **
127A21
04/24/90
k * * * **
127A27
04/24/90
* * * * **
127A29
* * * * **
04/24/90
AMOUNT
105.84
225.00
225.00
230.00
230.00 *
298.00
298.00 *
24.40
24.40
393.00*
253.75-
200.00
.88
175.50
122.63
175.00.
175.00
140.50
140.50
201.47
201.47
201.47-
201.47
185.50
185.50 *
26.78
26.78 *
134.25
134.25 *
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
JOHNSTON SALES /SERV VACUUM
JP FOOD SERVICE INC PLASTIC CANS
HIGH SCHOOL HIGH 5 ADVERTISING
TC PICTURE FRAMING PICTURE
STATE SUPPLY CO. REPAIR PUMP
3M CO CREDIT
3M CO SIGNS
3M CO SIGNS
3M CO SIGNS
ACME WINDOW CLEAN
ADIRONDACK DIRECT
ADVON
ADVON
ADVON
ADT SECURITY SYS.
ART GOKEY
ALBINSON
WINDOW CLEANING
EQUIP REPLACE
LAUNDRY /UNIFOPRMS
LAUNDRY /UNIFORMS
LAUNDRY /UNIFOPRMS
ALARM SERVICE
MILEAGE
BLUE PRINTING
05-07 -90 PAGE 9
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
27- 4504 - 662 -66 7388
27- 4504 - 667 -66 916031 7482
27- 4214- 667 -66 506 7480
27- 4504 - 662 -66 457930 6959
28- 4248 -- 702 -70 31340 6674--* -CKS
10- 4542 - 325 -30
10- 4542 - 325 -30
10- 4542- 325 -30 5306
10- 4542 - 325 -30
** *-CKS
10- 4504- 390 -30 7339
* ** -CKS
10- 4901 - 420 -42 187713
* ** -CKS
30- 4262 - 782 -78 892396 7406
30- 4262 - 782 -78 892396 7406
30- 4262 - 782 -78 892396 7406
* ** -CKS
30- 4304 - 782 -78 462232 7296
* ** -CKS
40- 4208 - 806 -80
* ** -CKS
10- 4570 - 260 -26 639675 5352
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 318 -30
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
10- 4504 - 318 -30
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
127Ai9
04/24/90
43.20
10- 4248 - 560 -56
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
D CELL BATTERY
127A39
04/24/90
79.80
41- 45-18- 900 -90
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
STARTER
127A39
04/30/90
124.10
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
BLADE
127A39
04/30/90
148.42
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
GENERAL SUPPLIES
395.52
127A40
05/01/90
114.94
ACTION MAILING SERV
MAILING
114.94
1-7A41
04/24/90
191.30
AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE
MEAT
191.30
127A43
04/30/90
101.00
AM LASER CUT GRAFIX
PARTS
k k * * k k
101.00
127A53
04/2.4/90
175.01
AMERICAN SHARECOM
TELEPHONE
175.01
127A67
04/30/90
49.25
AQUA ENGINEERING
NOZZLE HEADS
49.25
*
127A67
AQUA ENGINEERING
12;A;@
04/24/90
19.95
AGP6WPlD GOFFiE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
19.95
*
127A96
04/24/90
131.50
AUTOMOBILE SERV CTR
REPAIR WORK
k k R k *
131.50
*
127A98
04/30/90
84.95
AVR INC
CALCIUM CHLORIDE
127A98
04/30/90
106.45
AVR INC
CALCIUM CHLORIDE
191.40
127803
04/30/90
29.57
BENSON
SAFETY GLASSES
127603
04/24/90
22.26
BENSON
SAFETY GLASSES
127803
04/24/90
29.15
BENSON
SAFETY GLASSES
* * k k
80.98
127605
05/01/90
25.00
BACH -BILL
POSTAGE
127B05
04/26/90
18.48
BACH -BILL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT NO. IN
10- 4504 - 301 -30
10- 4540 - 560 -56
10- 4580- 301 -30
40- 4504 - 801 -80
10- 4290 - 510 -51
27- 4624 - 663 -66
10- 4620 - 560 -56
10- 4256 - 510 -51
05 -07 -90 PAGE 10
J. # P.O. # MESSAGE
7002 7079
10987 7107
7006 7182
7005 7144
3227
5506
* ** -CKS
6537 7286
* ** -CKS
10- 4262 - 301 -30 298302
10- 4262 - 646 -64 292614
10- 4642- 301 -30 293717
30- 4290 - 781 -78
30- 4504 - 782 -78
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 318 -30
24520 7281
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 318 -30
24466 7011
* ** -CKS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
7175 6931
* ** -CKS
41- 45-18- 900 -90
19958
41- 4518 - 900 -90
20084
10- 4262 - 301 -30 298302
10- 4262 - 646 -64 292614
10- 4642- 301 -30 293717
30- 4290 - 781 -78
30- 4504 - 782 -78
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
05 -07 -90 PAGE 11
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
# MESSAGE
127605
04/26/90
77.77
BACH -BILL
OFFICE SUPPLIES
30- 4516- 781 -78
121.25
*
k k k * * k
* ** -CKS
127607
04/24/90
37.00
BADGER METER INC
FREIGHT /METER
40- 4540 - 807 -80
624363
5189
37.00
*
k k k k k k
* ** -CKS
127618
04/30/90
110.28-
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
CREDIT
10- 4540 - 560 -56
14480
127618
04/24/90
81.28
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
11603
6102
127618
04/24/90
207.00
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
BATTERY
10- 4540 - 560 -56
11466
7149
127618
04/30/90
330.84
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
BATTERIES
10- 4540 - 560 -56
12409
6943
508.84
i
k k k k w k
* ** -CKS
127622
04/24/90
102.70
BEER WHOLESALERS
BEER
27- 4630 - 663 -66
5505
127622
04/24/90
382.40
BEER WHOLESALERS
BEER
27- 4630 - 667 -66
7198
485.10
*
k k * * k
* ** -CKS
127B24
05/01/90
259.48
BLEVENS CONS SUPPLY
COST /GOODS SOLD
28- 4624 - 703 -70
779901
7114
259.48
*
k k k k* k
'
* ** -CKS
127627
04/24/90
169.50
BERGFORD TRUCKING
LIQUOR DELIVERY
50- 4626 - 822 -82
127627
04/24/90
317.50
BERGFORD TRUCKING
LIQUOR DELIVERY
50- 4626 - 842 -84
127827
04/24/90
289.00
BERGFORD TRUCKING
LIQUOR DELIVERY
50- 4626 - 862 -86
776.00
k k k* k k
•
* ** -CKS
127630
04/24/90
4.40
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
BINDER
10- 4504 - 160 -16
561683
127830
04/24/90
35.91
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
DISKETTES /BINDERS
10- 4504 - 160 -16
560138
127630
05/01/90
30.00
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
ENVELOPES
10- 4504 - 260 -26
561116
127830
04/26/90
21.73
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42
127630
04/26/90
23.00
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42
561065
127630
04/30/90
90.79
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 420 -42
563585
127630
04/30/90
10.00
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
CALCULATOR
10- 4504 - 420 -42
563576
127B30
04/24/90
3.35
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
PUSH PINS
10- 4504 - 440 -44
560138
127630
04/24/90
98.41
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 490 -49
545763
127630
04/24/90
8.54
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 490 -49
127830
04/24/90
49.42
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 490 -49
560134
127630
04/24/90
135.41
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
560138
127830
04/24/90
41.46
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
561683
127630
04/30/90
32.40
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
LEGAL PADS
10- 4504 - 510 -51
563576
127830
04/24/90
137.92
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
CHAIRMAT
10- 4504 - 540 -54
557346
6805
127630
04/24/90
4.80
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
MARKERS
10- 4516 - 140 -14
560138
127630
04/24/90
89.31
BERTELSON BROS.' INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10- 4516 - 440 -44
558089
6067
127B30
04/30/90
41.20
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
CHALK BOARD
27- 4516 - 667 -66
561998
7315
127630
04/24/90
2.87
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
27- 4516 - 667 -66
560313
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
05 -07 -90
PAGE 12
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
#
MESSAGE
127630
04/24/90
4.38
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
30- 4516 - 781 -78
6742
127630
04/30/90
39.36
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
30- 4516- 781 -78
563770
7316
905.16
* * * * **
** *-CKS
127632
04/26/90
117.25
BEST LOCK OF MPLS
PADLOCKS
10- 4504 - 646 -64
3416
7076
127B32
04/30/90
40.81
BEST LOCK OF MPLS
PADLOCKS
10- 4504- 646 -64
3605
7418
127B32
04/24/90
34.50
BEST LOCK OF MPLS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10-4504-646-64-3172
6854
127632
04/24/90
34.50
BEST LOCK OF MPLS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
3174
6921
127832
04/24/90
34.50
BEST LOCK OF MPLS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
3173
7140
127632
05/01/90
8.23
BEST LOCK OF MPLS
KEYS
27- 4504 - 661 -66
3584
7119
127632
05/01/90
5.13
BEST LOCK OF MPLS
KEYS
27- 4540 - 667 -66
3788
7481
274.92
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
127B61
04/24/90
1,200.00
BOUSTEAD ELEC & MFG.
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
40- 4248 - 801 -80
280550
6938
1,200.00
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
127B72
04/24/90
175.75
BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE
FUTURE FORUM
10- 4206 - 500 -50
127672
04/24/90
147.74
BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE
VOLUNTEER RECPTN
10- 4500 - 500 -50
323.49
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
127679
04/24/90
482.94
BROCK WHITE
COLUMN FORM
41- 4504- 900 -90
305580
6858
482.94
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
127681
05/01/90
1,797.59
BRW INC.
PRO SERV ENG
60- 1300 - 290 -04
57519
1,797.59
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
127001
04/24/90
90.16
C & S DISTRIBUTING
COST /GOODS SOLD
23- 4624 - 613 -61
104107
6905
127C01
04/24/90
278.36
C & S DISTRIBUTING
COST /GOODS SOLD
23- 4624- 613 -61
103704.6757
368.52
** * * *k
127OO8
i;7L0Q"QQ
3:22
06
MERMFER
14-TER P'-'MP
1.9 -:5-49 569 56
P66891
7940
* ** -CKS
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
127C13
04/24/90
116.00
CASH REGISTER SALES
CASH REGISTER TAPES
27- 4516 - 661 -66
398717
6895
116.00
* * *k **
* ** -CKS
127C17
04/24/90
135.00
CDP
SERV CONTR /EQUIP
10- 4288 - 420 -42
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
127C18
04/24/90
127C18
05/01/90
127C18
05/01/90
127C18
04/24/90
127C18
05/01/90
* * * * **
127C25
127C25
127C25
127C25
127C29
* * * * **
127C32
127C33
127C33
127C33
127C33
127C33
127C33
127C34
127C38
127C38
127C38
127C44
127C61
127C61
127C61
04/24/90
04/30/90
04/24/90
04/30/90
04/30/90
AMOUNT
135.00
30.50.
LAKE
88.00
DINNER MEETING
43.00
LAKE
28.95
FLOWERS
18.50
LAKE
208.95
FLOWERS
64.60
LAKE
228.00
SYMPATHY PLANT
158.75
LAKE
47.32
FLOWERS
498.67
490.00
EDINA
490.00
27.10
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
CEDAR
LAKE
FLORAL
DINNER MEETING
CEDAR
LAKE
FLORAL
FLOWERS
CEDAR
LAKE
FLORAL
FLOWERS
CEDAR
LAKE
FLORAL
SYMPATHY PLANT
CEDAR
LAKE
FLORAL
FLOWERS
CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO
CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO
CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO
CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO
CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS
05/01/90
116.03
WATER
FRAN CALLAHAN
WATER
116.03
WATER
10- 4258 - 646 -64
WATER
04/24/90
27.10
50- 4258 - 861 -86
CITY OF
EDINA
04/24/90
134.16
CITY.OF
EDINA
04/24/90
187.48
CITY OF
EDINA
04/24/90
27.10
CITY OF
EDINA
04/24/90
44.72
CITY OF
EDINA
04/24/90
27.10
CITY OF
EDINA
447.66
05/01/90
19.78
CITY OF
RICHFIELD
19.78
04/24/90
162.50
CLAREYS
SAFETY EQUIP
04/24/90
205.55
CLAREYS
SAFETY EQUIP
04/24/90
292.00
CLAREYS
SAFETY EQUIP
660.05.
05/01/90
94.00
COCA COLA BOTTLING
94.00
04/30/90
189.00
COMTECH
INC.
04/24/90
58.50
COMTECH
INC.
04/30/90
886.60
COMTECH
INC.
05 -07 -90 PAGE 13
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4206 - 100 -10 7206
10- 4500 - 500 -50 527422 7426
10- 4504 - 100 -10 7426
10- 4504 - 100 -10 527681 7206
10- 4504 - 140 -14 7426
* ** -CKS
AD FOR BIDS 10- 4210 - 140 -14 111579
AD FOR BIDS 10- 4210 - 140 -14 111657
AD FOR BIDS 10- 4210 - 140 -14. 111152
ADVERTISING 30- 4214 - 781 -78 112330 7405'
* ** -CKS
PRINTING 10- 4201 - 627 -62 8471 7381
* ** -CKS
MILEAGE /APRIL 10- 4208 - 480 -48
WATER
10- 4258 - 440 -44
WATER
10- 4258 - 520 -52
WATER
10- 4258 - 540 -54
WATER
10- 4258 - 646 -64
WATER
50- 4258 - 821 -82
WATER
50- 4258 - 861 -86
LIGHT /POWER 41- 4252 - 900 -90
* ** -CKS
SCOTT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 440 -44 55877 6060
PARTS 10- 4540- 440 -44 55877 6060
AIR CYLINDER 10- 4901 - 440 -44 52419 6059
* ** -CKS
COKE 27- 4504 - 663 -66
PROF, SERVICES 30- 4201 - 782 -78 12082 7401
PROF: SERVICES 30- 4201 - 782 -78 12035 7297
GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 11907 6145
*** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
127C87
05/01/90
127087
04/24/90
127087
04/30/90
127C87
04/24/90
127C87
04/24/90
127C92
04/24/90
127C93
04/30/90
x * * *x*
127D07
0- 4/24/90
127Q07
04/30/90
i27D07
04/24/90
127D27
05/01/90
* * * * **
127D31
04/24/90
* * k x
127D33
05/01/90
127D33
05/01/90
127D78
05/01/90
127D79
04/24/90
127D79
04/24/90
127D85
04/24/90
CHECK
REGISTER
05 -07 -90
PAGE 14
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
#
MESSAGE
1,134.10
* ** -CKS
50.45-
CURTIN MATHESON
SCI
CREDIT
10 -4504- 482 -48
6611
519.39
CURTIN MATHESON
SCI
LAB SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 482 -48
7131
71.84
CURTIN MATHESON
SCI
LAB SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 482 -48
7131
52.84
CURTIN MATHESON
SCI
MEDIA
10- 4504 - 482 -48
6611
80.32
CURTIN MATHESON
SCI
LAB SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 482 -48
6611
673.94
* ** -CKS
253.95
CUSTOM FIRE APP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 440 -44
3003
6074
253.95
*
30.00
CERT HYD SPEC
KIT FOR PUMP
10- 4540 - 560 -56
71525
7165
30.00
*
* ** -CKS
146.56
D.C. HEY CO.
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
23- 4248 - 612 -61
163874
48.13
D.C: HEY CO.
SERVICE CONTRACT
30- 4288 - 781 -78
167680
7400
159.30
D.C. HEY CO.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
30- 4516 - 781 -78
165769
7044
353.99
*
* ** -CKS
198.22
DAVE S FOOD WAGON
DAIRY
27- 4624 - 663-66
5508
198.22
*
* ** -CKS
41.56
DAVIES WATER EQUIP
TOOLS
40- 4580 - 803 -80
2227
6922
41.56
* ** -CKS
162.75
DAVIS- EUGENE
SERVICES
10- 4201 - 600 -60
26.01
DAVIS- EUGENE
MILEAGE
10- 4208 - 600 -60
188.76
*
* ** -CKS
1,200.00
DEDE HENSEL
PRO FEES /SHOW
28- 4224 - 701 -70
1,200.00
*
5,944-.27
DORSEY & WHITNEY
LEGAL
10- 4218- 220 -22
372516
8,240.70
DORSEY.& WHITNEY
LEGAL
10- 4218- 220 -22
372517
14,184.97
* ** -CKS
81.48
DUFFEY PAPER CO.
PAPER
10- 4504 - 510 -51
B7884
6968
81.48
*
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
* ** -CKS
30- 4288 - 782 -78
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
3168 6946
* * ** **
127D90
04/24/90
34.95
* ** -CKS
* * * * **
34.95
127E02
05/01/90
805.36
127E02
05/01/90
253.28
* ** -CKS
127E02
04/24/90
475.05
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
1,533.69
127E14
04/24/90
372.00
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
107041 6577
372.00
*
* * ** **
* ** -CKS
41- 4552 - 900 -90
1717 6867
127E20
04/24/90
85..00
85.00
*
127E21
04/24/90
1,800.00
1,800.00
*
127E33
04/24/90
13.00
13.00
127E41
04/24/90
9,527.85
* * * * **
9,527.85
127E71
05/01/90
109.00
* * * * **
.109.00
127E75
04/26/90
300.00
300.00
127E81
04/24/90
93.25
93.25
127E94
04/24/90
700.00
127E94
04/24/90
1,644.00
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
DYNAMED_ FIRST AID SUPPLIES
E KRAEMER & SONS INC GENERAL SUPPLIES
E KRAEMER & SONS INC GENERAL SUPPLIES
E KRAEMER & SONS INC ROCK -FILL
EARL F. ANDERSON SIGNS
ECOLAB PEST ELIM. SERVICE CONTRACT
ECOMARC INC ODOR CONTROL
EDINA CHAM OF COM CHAMBER LUNCH
EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS RENTAL
ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY UNIFORMS
EMPLOYEES CLUB SUPPLIES
ENGINE PARTS SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS
STORM SEWER GRATES
STORM SEWER GRATES
ESS BROS & SONS
ESS BROS & SONS
05 -07 -90 PAGE 15
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
10- 4510 - 440 -44 552463 6061
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 314 -30 9582
40- 4504 - 803 -80 9582
41- 4518 - 900 -90 9357 1045
* ** -CKS
10- 4542 - 325 -30 95676 6864
* ** -CKS
30- 4288 - 782 -78
P59289 7241
40- 4504- 801 -80
3168 6946
* ** -CKS
10- 4206 - 140 -14
* ** -CKS
10- 4282 - 625 -62
* ** -CKS
10- 4642 - 420 -42
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 500 -50
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
107041 6577
* ** -CKS
41- 4552 - 900 -90
1717 6867
41- 4552- 900 -90
1733 6948
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
BROS & SONS
127E94
04/24/90
1,700.00
CHAIR
*kk * *k
RITE CONTROL
4,044.00
*
127F02
04/24/90
251.85
ELECTRIC
TOOLS
FOWLER
251.85
*
kk *lock
G ANDERSON
PAINT
LIZ
127F11
04/24/90
2,749.80
TRAIN SERV
127F11
04/26/90
2,250.10
CONT ED
x k k * k
TRAIN SERV
4,999.90
GOVT
127F47
04/24/90
113.30ii;.2;-
TRAIN SERV
127F47
04/26/90
1 23.10
REPAIR_
kkkkk k
COMMUNICATIONS
136.40* i3e --48
GEN.
127F50
04/24/90
55.43
55.43
k * k * k k
127G02
04/24/90
930.00
k k k k* k
930.00
127G09
04/24/90
100.00
127G09
04/24/90
100.00
127G09
04/24/90
225.00
127G09
05/01/90
225.00
127G09
05/01/90
225.00
kkkkk k
875.00
127G24
04/30/90
54.60
127G24
04/30/90
89.22
127G24
04/24/90
2.19
kkkkk k
146.01
*
127G52
04/30/90
40.70
kkkkk k
40.70
*
127G57
04/30/90
212.00
212.00
*
A.
300DIN CO. REPAIR PARTS
GOPHER OIL CO. FLOOR DRI
05 -07 -90 PAGE 16
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
41- 4552 - 900 -90 1751 7029
* ** -CKS
10- 4901- 510 -51 46251 7203
* ** -CKS
40- 4622 - 805 -80 137314 1670
40- 4622 - 805 -80 137782 1670
* ** -CKS
27- 4504 - 664 -66 43450 6982
27- 4540 - 664 -66 51940 7309
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 520 -52 74218 6570
* ** -CKS
30- 4201 - 781 -78
* ** -CKS
10- 4202 - 420 -42 7268
10- 4202 - 420 -42 7270
10- 4202 - 420 -42 7275
10- 4202 - 420 -42 7503
10- 4202 - 420 -42 7495
i
* ** -CKS
10- 4294 - 560 -56 64558
10- 4294 - 560 -56 64367
10- 4504 - 440 -44 63814
* ** -CKS
27- 4540- 664 -66 7293
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 560 -56 399217 7154
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ESS
BROS & SONS
MANHOLE ADJ RING
FACILITY
SYSTEMS
CHAIR
FEED
RITE CONTROL
WATER CHEMICALS
FEED
RITE CONTROL
WATER CHEMICALS
FOWLER
ELECTRIC
TOOLS
FOWLER
ELECTRIC
REPAIR PARTS
FRED
G ANDERSON
PAINT
LIZ
GEREBI
SERVICES
GOVT
TRAIN SERV
CONT ED
GOVT
TRAIN SERV
CONT ED
GOVT
TRAIN SERV
CONT ED
GOVT
TRAIN SERV
CONT ED
GOVT
TRAIN SERV
CONT ED
GEN.
COMMUNICATIONS
REPAIR_
GEN.
COMMUNICATIONS
ANTENNA /ACCESSORY
GEN.
COMMUNICATIONS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
300DIN CO. REPAIR PARTS
GOPHER OIL CO. FLOOR DRI
05 -07 -90 PAGE 16
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
41- 4552 - 900 -90 1751 7029
* ** -CKS
10- 4901- 510 -51 46251 7203
* ** -CKS
40- 4622 - 805 -80 137314 1670
40- 4622 - 805 -80 137782 1670
* ** -CKS
27- 4504 - 664 -66 43450 6982
27- 4540 - 664 -66 51940 7309
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 520 -52 74218 6570
* ** -CKS
30- 4201 - 781 -78
* ** -CKS
10- 4202 - 420 -42 7268
10- 4202 - 420 -42 7270
10- 4202 - 420 -42 7275
10- 4202 - 420 -42 7503
10- 4202 - 420 -42 7495
i
* ** -CKS
10- 4294 - 560 -56 64558
10- 4294 - 560 -56 64367
10- 4504 - 440 -44 63814
* ** -CKS
27- 4540- 664 -66 7293
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 560 -56 399217 7154
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
05 -07 -90
CHECK NO'.
DATE
AMOUNT
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. #
127G62
05/01/90
102.00
* ** -CKS
102.00
*
* * * * k
5517
127G72
04/24/90
30.00
* ** 'CKS
* * * k * k
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
30
00 *
127G79
05/01/90
18,019.00
* k * k k k
* ** -CKS
18,019.00
*
127H09
04/24/90
561.00
561.00
*
127H23
04/26/90
197,500.00
52012 6929
127H23
04/26/90
37,500.00
127H23
04/26/90
15,000.00
INSURANCE
10- 4260 - 510 -51
250,000.00
HARRIS HOMEYER CO.
INSURANCE
10- 4260 - 510 -51
127H31
05/01/90
132.41
132.41
127H33
04/24/90
371.10
GENERAL SUPPLIES
28- 4504 - 702 -70
2959 7031
371.10
127H34
04/24/90
21,362.92
* ** -CKS
* * * * * *
WORKHOUSE /JAIL
21,362.92
127H36'
04/26/90
933.65
10- 4922 - 503 -50
933.65
* * * * * *
* ** -CKS
HENN CTY MED CENTER
127H62
05/01/90
25.25 -23-2
127H62
04/24/90
12.55
127H62
04/30/90
57.80
10- 4504 - 140 -14
244537
95.60* 9'6e
127H63
04/24/90
472.00
HOFF - WILLIAMSON
DEPOSIT STAMP
472.00
244466
CHECK REGISTER
05 -07 -90
PAGE 17
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. #
MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
GRANDMA S CUPBOARD
POP CORN
27- 4504 - 663 -66
5517
* ** 'CKS
GARY SMIEJA
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
* ** -CKS
GREUPNER -JOE
LESSONS
27- 4100 - 661 -66
* ** -CKS
HALLMAN
HYD OIL
10- 4618 - 560 -56
52012 6929
* ** -CKS
HARRIS HOMEYER CO.
INSURANCE
10- 4260 - 510 -51
HARRIS HOMEYER CO.
INSURANCE
10- 4260 - 510 -51
HARRIS HOMEYER CO.
INSURANCE
10- 4260 - 510 -51
* ** -CKS
HOLMSTEN ICE RINKS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
28- 4504 - 702 -70
2959 7031
* ** -CKS
HENN CTY SHERIFF
WORKHOUSE /JAIL
10- 4286- 220 -22
HENN COUNTY TREAS.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
10- 4922 - 503 -50
* ** -CKS
HENN CTY MED CENTER
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
10- 4510- 440 -44
758 6077
* ** -CKS
HOFF - WILLIAMSON
NOTARY STAMP
10- 4504 - 140 -14
244537
HOFF - WILLIAMSON
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42
244342
HOFF - WILLIAMSON
DEPOSIT STAMP
10- 4504 - 510 -51
244466
HOFFERS INC
GLASS REPLACEMENT
10- 4540 - 390 -30
149984 6718
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
60- 1300 - 016 -20
7208
CHECK REGISTER
7208
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
7395
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
* k k k * k
127H79
04/30/90
480.00
7187
HORWATH -TOM
FORSTRY WORK
127H79
04/30/90
15.00
HORWATH -TOM
ASSESSMENT INSP
127H79
04/30/90
84.90
HORWATH -TOM
MILEAGE
579.90
kkkkkw
127H85
04/24/90
35.00
HUMPHREY RADIATOR
HEATER CORE
127H85
04/24/90
26.50
HUMPHREY RADIATOR
CLEAN /REPAIR
61.50
127I23
04/24/90
14.00
INDELCO CORP
IRRIGATION PARTS
14.00
127I25
04/24/90
109.47
INLAND TRUCK PTS
REPAIR PARTS
127I25
04/24/90
621.29
INLAND TRUCK PTS
REPAIR PARTS
127I25
04/24/90
103.27-
INLAND TRUCK PTS
CREDIT.
127I25
04/24/90
39.22
INLAND TRUCK PTS
PARTS
666.71
*
* * k k * k
127I59
04/24/90
113.75
INTERIOR COM SYS.
PHONE
127I59
04/24/90
192.40
INTERIOR COM SYS.
TELEPHONE
k k k * k
306.15
*
127I78
04/24/90
75.00
ISIA
RIBBONS
127278
04/24/90
63.85
ISIA
TEST PATCHES
138.85
*kk *kk
127J09
04/26/90
896.76
J.H. LARSON ELEC
CONSTRUCTION
127J09
04/30/90
2,242.65
J.H. LARSON ELEC
CONSTRUCTION
k k * * * k
3,139.41
127J23
04/30/90
26.40
JR JOHNSON SUP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
k k k k k k
26.40
127J27
G4/30/90
25.74
JERRYS FOODS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
127J27
04/30/90
64.73
JERRYS FOODS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
90.47
05 -07 -90 PAGE 18
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 644 -64
10- 4201 - 980 -64
10- 4208 - 644 -64
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
10- 4540 - 560 -56
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 643 -64 49971 6789
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56 6866
10- 4540 - 560 -56 76001 6866
10 =4540- 560 -56 6866
10- 4540 - 560 -56 476077 6945
* ** -CKS
10- 4256 - 510 -51 026790 7207
30- 4256 - 782 -78 26982 7128
* ** -CKS
28- 4504 - 702 -70 6761
28- 4504 - 702 -70 6761
* ** -CKS
60- 1300 - 016 -20
7208
60- 1300 - 016 -20
7208
* ** -CKS
30- 4504 - 782 -78 72902
7395
* ** -CKS
23- 4504 - 611 -61
23- 4504 - 611 -61
7187
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
x x x x x x
127J-,5
04/ "0/90
127J35
04/30/90
* *x * **
127J41
04/30/90
127J41
04/24/90
* * * * **
127J27
i2?462
04/24/90
* * * * **
127J74
04/24/90
127J74
04/24/90
127J74
04/24/90
127J74
04/24/90
127J74
04/24/90
127J74
04/24/90
127J74
04/24/90
*x* * **
127J99
04/24/90
127J99
04/24/90
127J99
04/24/90
* * * * **
127K23
04/24/90
127K23
04/24/90
* * * * **
127K35
04/30/90
127K35
04/24/90
127K35
04/30/90
127K35
04/24/90
127K35
04/24/90
127K35
04/24/90
127K3.5
04/24/90
127K35
04/24/90
127K35
05/01/90
127K35
05/01/90
127K35
04/24/90
AMOUNT
28.00
33.67
61.67 *
424.99
333.24
758.23 *
2.97
2.97
32.00
15.20
108.90
119.68
11.15
58.21
62.80
407.94
40.00
40.00-
40.00
40.00
873.60
448.00
1,321.60
312.57
19.17
27.87
283.40
181.55
179.52
28.84
56.21
59.99
13.19
53.46
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
JERRYS PRINTING
JERRYS PRINTING
JIM HATCH SALES
JIM HATCH SALES
PUNCHED PAPER
SOLICITOR PERMITS
BROOMS /AXES
SCOOPS
JERRYS FOODS (see also 127J27)
BLEACH
(see also 124J74)
JUSTUS LUMBER
JUSTUS LUMBER
JUSTUS LUMBER
JUSTUS LUMBER
JUSTUS LUMBER
JUSTUS LUMBER
JUSTUS LUMBER
JANET CANTON
JANET CANTON
JANET CANTON
KELLY SERVICES
KELLY SERVICES
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
.PARTICLE BOARD
MATERIAL
LUMBER
LUMBER
LUMBER
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
LOGIS /MILEAGE
LOIS /MILEAGE
LOIS /MILEAGE
KELLY SERVICE /ADM
KELLY SERV /PERSNL
OAK BOARD
MATERIAL
CERTIFOAM
LUMBER
PARTS
SUPPLIES
LUMBER
LUMBER
LUMBER
LUMBER
LUMBER
05 -07 -90 PAGE 19
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
10- 4504- 510 -51 2208
10- 4600 - 140 -14 2185
10- 4580 - 301 -30 10382 6981
10- 4580 - 301 -30 10380 6992
10- 4512 - 440 -44
10- 4540 - 520 -52
10- 4540 - 520 -52
10- 4540 - 520 -52
10- 4540 - 540 -54
10- 4540 - 560 -56
40- 4540- 802 -80
40- 4540 - 802 -80
10- 4208 - 160 -16
10- 4208 - 160 -16
10- 4208 - 160 -16
10- 4201 - 140 -14
10- 4201 - 140 -14
10- 4504 - 314 -30
10- 4504 - 325 -30
10- 4540 - 540 -54
10- 4604- 646 -64
10- 4620 - 560 -56
27- 4504 - 664 -66
27- 4604 - 662 -66
27- 4604 - 662 -66
27- 4604 - 662 -66
27- 4604- 664 -66
27- 4604 - 664 -66
30454 6571
31580 6727
30656 6628
31112 6659
31725 6733
29142 6383
30302 6563
638688 7087
606259 6847
612834 7086
606715 6977
606313 6917
606628 7042
606587 6961
638795 7141
610374 7291
610507 7214
606726 7116
a
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
19.90 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
127K35
05/01/90
127K35
05/01/90
127K35
04/24/90
127K35
04/24/90
127K35
04/24/90
127K35
04/30/90
127K35
04/24/90
* * * * **
COMM
127LO2
04/24/90
* * * * **
127L04
04/30/90
127L04
04/24/90
* * * * **
127L22
04/24/90
127L22
04/24/90
127L28.
4/24/OG
127L23
X4/24/9 0
127L28
04/24/90
127L28
04/24/90
127L28
04/24/90
127L28
04/24/90
127L28
04/24/90
127L28
04/24/90
127L28
04/24/90
127L28
04/24/90
* * * * **
127L30
04/24/90
127L30
04/24/90
* * * * **
127L34 04/24/90
* * * * **
127L52 4/26/90
127L52 04/24/90
247.40*
lb
05 -07 -90 PAGE 20
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
28- 4504 - 702 -70
28- 4504 - 702 -70
28- 4504- 702 -70
40- 4540 - 802 -80
40- 4540- 802 -80
40- 4540 - 802 -80
40- 4540 - 802 -80
612871
610336
606624
606714
606366
638625
606365
7118
7199
7032
6989
7019
7108
7019
526.41
LABOR
RELATIONS ASN.
CHECK REGISTER
10- 4201 - 140 -14
AMOUNT
526.41
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
45.12
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
59.83
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
101.44
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
SHOW SUPPLIES
77.65
6980
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
9.52
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
49.00
GC SUPPLIES
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
19.84
LANDSCAPE &.TURF
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
1,578.17
127L52 4/26/90
127L52 04/24/90
247.40*
lb
05 -07 -90 PAGE 20
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
28- 4504 - 702 -70
28- 4504 - 702 -70
28- 4504- 702 -70
40- 4540 - 802 -80
40- 4540- 802 -80
40- 4540 - 802 -80
40- 4540 - 802 -80
612871
610336
606624
606714
606366
638625
606365
7118
7199
7032
6989
7019
7108
7019
526.41
LABOR
RELATIONS ASN.
LABOR SERVICES
10- 4201 - 140 -14
526.41
374.01
LAHASS
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
9221
6980
188.70
LAHASS
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
106326
6980
'562.71
187.50
LANDSCAPE & TURF
GC SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 664 -66
4310
6487
375.00
LANDSCAPE &.TURF
SEED
27- 4562 - 664 -66
4331
7004
562.50
294.83
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 301 -30
6777
154.00
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 322 -30
6776
379.73
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
TAPE RIVET KIT
10- 4504 - 325 -30
6910
374.18
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
SCREWS /TAPE
10- 4540 - 560 -56
6912
419.06
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
6778
408.30
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
6911
245.52
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
STARTER KIT
40- 4504 - 801 -80
6104
374.75
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
40- 4504 - 801 -80
6641
299.12
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 803 -80
6919
70.05
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 803 -80
6734
3,019.54
280.80
LAYNE MINNESOTA CO.
AIR RELEASE VALVE
40- 4540 - 805 -80
11292
6807
152.16
LAYNE MINNESOTA CO.
MANHOLE GASKETS
40- 4540 - 805 -80
11284
7000
432.96
15.75 LEEF BROS. INC. PRO SERVICES
15.75 *
79.80 LINJO ASSOC WATER TREATMENT
167.60 LINJO ASSOC WATER TREATMENT
i6?.-6 6- *
23- 4201 - 612 -61 205963
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
30,4564- 783 - 78,409 7325
30- 4564- 783 -78 2404 7043
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT
CHECK REGISTER 05 -07 -90 PAGE 21
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* * * * ** * ** -CKS
127L56
04/24/90
21.83
LINHOFF
DEVELOP FILM
10- 4504 - 260 -26
169040
127L56
04/26/90
10.00
LINHOFF
DEVELOPING FILM
10- 4504 - 260 -26
169689
127L56
04/24/90
54.41
LINHOFF
DEVELOP FILM
10- 4504 - 260 -26
169020
127L56
04/24/90
10.75
LINHOFF
DEVELOP FILM
10- 4504 - 260 -26
168978
127L56
04/26/90
31.92
LINHOFF
DEVELOPING FILM
10- 4504 - 260 -26
169688
127L56
04/26/9.0
.09
LINHOFF
DEVELOP FILM
10- 4504 - 260 -26
169689
127L56
04/24/90
6.75
LINHOFF
FILM DEVELOPING
10- 4508- 480 -48
169126
127L56
04/24/90
20.25
LINHOFF
SUPPLIES
12- 4504 - 434 -43
169307
127L56
i27656
04/24/90
94/26,'99
13..50
;14
LINHOFF
6INNOFF
PHOTO PROCESSING
WATER TREATMENT
12- 4508- 434 -43
@9 4564 ;83 78
168980
2489
1325
A A
169.50* 2-
9 A
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
127L60
04/24/90
3,115.49
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
10- 4233 - 160 -16
127L60
04/24/90
2,389.37
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
10- 4233 - 200 -20
127L60
04/24/90
3,419.98
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
10- 4233 - 420 -42
127L60
04/24/90
1,693.22
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
40- 4233 - 800 -80
127L60
04/24/90
566.69
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
50- 4233 - 820 -82
127L60
04/24/90
566.69
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
50- 4233 - 840 -84
127L60
04/24/90
566.68
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
50- 4233 - 860 -86
12,318.12
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
127L66
04/30/90
4.89
LONG LAKE FORD
TRACT
WASHER /SEAL
10-4540-560-56'103646
7176
4.89
* * * ■ **
* ** -CKS
127M02
04/24/90
246.00
MAC QUEEN EQUIP
INC.
MAIN BROOM
10- 4534 - 310 -30
4018
6711
127M02
04/24/90
104.49
MAC QUEEN EQUIP
INC.
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
4091
6925
127M02
04/24/90
37.04
MAC QUEEN EQUIP
INC.
AIR COND FILTER
10- 4540 - 560 -56
4067
6915
387.53
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
127M12
04/24/00
121.48
MATHISON CO.
COST /GOODS SOLD
23- 4624 - 613 -61
646680
6755
121.48
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
127M14
04/30/90
15.00
MAUMA
SEMINAR
10- 4202 - 140 -14
15.00
* * * **
* ** -CKS
127M16
05/01/90
217.00
MCCAREN DESIGNS
TREES /PLANTS /SHRUBS
30- 4660 - 782 -78
2914
7434
127M16
05/01/90
472.16
MCCAREN DESIGNS
TREES /PLANTS /SHRUBS
30- 4660 - 782 -78
2915
7433
689.16
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
401.12
M AMUNDSON
CHECK REGISTER
SUPPLY
05 -07 -90 PAGE 22
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
127M27
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
127M19
04/24/90
2,663.92
10- 4504 - 560 -56
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
127M19
04/24/90
204.78
MERIT
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
TOOLS
10- 4580 - 560 -56
127M19
04/24/90
176.12
04/24/90
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
TOOLS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
127M19
04/24/90
32.02
23974
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
28- 4504 - 704 -70
4,062.00
3,076.84
*
FERTILIZER
10- 4558 - 642 -64
24127
* * * * **
127M27
04/24/90
467.50
MERIT
* ** -CKS
127M22
04/2:/90
451.63
6928
MCNEILUS STEEL
PIPES
10- 4540 - 560 -56 57391 6796
127M22
04%24/90
451.63
•CLEANING SUPPLIES
MCNEILUS STEEL
BLACK PIPES
10-4620-560-56'57390 6795
127'127
05/01/90
903.26
*
MERIT
SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
* * * * ** * ** -CKS
127M27
04/30/90
401.12
M AMUNDSON
MERIT
SUPPLY
PAINT /DISPENSER
10- 4504 - 540 -54
24094
7082
127M27
04/24/90
321.17
04/24/90
MERIT
SUPPLY
SCOTTIES /PAINT
10- 4504 - 560 -56
23983
6813
127M27
04/26/90
496.00
MERIT
SUPPLY
STACKING CHAIRS
10- 4504 - 646 -64
24139
7305
127M27
04/24/90
417.36
MERIT
SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
23974
6800
127M27
04/26/90
4,062.00
MERIT
SUPPLY
FERTILIZER
10- 4558 - 642 -64
24127
6833
127M27
04/24/90
467.50
MERIT
SUPPLY
CLEANER
10- 4620 - 560 -56
24030
6928
127M27
04/24/90
21.70
*
MERIT
SUPPLY
•CLEANING SUPPLIES
23- 4512 - 612 -61
24010
6862
127'127
05/01/90
445.00
MERIT
SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
28- 4512 - 702 -7.0
24114
7216
127M27
04/24/90
480.90
MERIT
SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
30- 4512 - 782 -78
24031
6891
127M27
04/30/90
401.70
MERIT
SUPPLY
HTH CHLORINE
40- 4504 - 801 -80
24055
6947
127M27
04/24/90
993.00
MERIT
SUPPLY
TABLES
60- 1300 - 005 -20
23943
6616
8,507.45
*
** *-CKS
127M29
04/24/90
44.42
MESSERLI & KRAMER
AMBULANCE COLLECT
10- 3180 - 000 -00
44.42
*
* * * * ** * ** -CKS
127M32
05/01/90
113.74
M AMUNDSON
CIGARETTES
50- 4632 - 862 -86
127M32
04/26/90
369.81 969.se
M AMUNDSON
CIGARETTES
50- 4632 - 862 -86
127M32
04/24/90
285.28
M AMUNDSON
CIGARETTES
50- 4634 - 862 -86
10- 4524- 301 -30
3355
127M42
04/24/90
136.56
MIDWEST
ASPHALT
768.83*
BLACKTOP
10- 4524 - 301 -30
3302 1103
* * * * **
04/26/90
440.26
MIDWEST
* ** -CKS
127M35
04/24/90
218,619.58
METRO WASTE CONTROL
SEWER SERVICE
40- 4312 - 812 -80 505005
115.58
218,619.58 *
ASPHALT
COR.
BLACKTOP
* * * * ** * ** -CKS
127M42
04/26/90
280.61
MIDWEST
ASPHALT
COR.
BLACKTOP
10- 4524- 301 -30
3326
127M42
04/26/90
238.17
MIDWEST
ASPHALT
COR.
BLACKTOP
10- 4524- 301 -30
3355
127M42
04/24/90
136.56
MIDWEST
ASPHALT
COR.
BLACKTOP
10- 4524 - 301 -30
3302 1103
127M42
04/26/90
440.26
MIDWEST
ASPHALT
COR.
BLACKTOP
10- 4524 - 314 -30
3355
127M42
04/26/90
115.58
MIDWEST
ASPHALT
COR.
BLACKTOP
40- 4524 - 803 -80
3326
127M42
04/26/90
237.41
MIDWEST
ASPHALT
COR.
BLACKTOP
40- 4524 - 803 -80
3355
1,448.59
*
* * * * ** * ** -CKS
1990 CITY_ OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
127M46
05/01/90
127M46
04/24/90
127M46
05/01/90
k k * k k
127M51
04/24/90
k k k k k k
*
127M68
04/26/90
127M68
04/24/90
127M68
04/26/90
127M68
04/26/90
127M68
04/26/90
127M68
04/26/90
127M68
04/26/90
127M68
04/26/90
127M68
04/26/90
127M68
04/26/90
* k * * k k
127M70
05/01/90
127M70
05/01/90
127M70
05/01/90
127M70
04/24/90
k k k k k k
127M73
04/24/90
* * k k * k
127M76
04/24/90
127M76
04/24/90
* k * k * k
127M80
04/24/90
127M80
04/24/90
127M80
04/24/90
127M81
04/24/90
127M81
04/24/90
127M81
04/24/90
127M81
04/24/90
55.72
10- 4504 - 301-30
MN.
CHECK REGISTER
185.79
AMOUNT
MN.
GLOVE
VENDOR
*
ITEM DESCRIPTION
174.04
67.15
METZ
BAKING
CO
BREAD
143.48
MN
METZ
BAKING
CO
BREAD
5.50
110.20
METZ
BAKING
CO
COST /GOODS SOLD
323.02
MN.
TORO INC.
203.31
27- 1340 - 000 -00
MN.
1,060.00
102.04
MIDWEST WIRE
& STEEL
METAL STAKES
1,060.00
MN.
TORO INC.
87.68
MN.
CELLULAR
TEL.
CAR PHONES
215.27
MN.
CELLULAR
TEL.
CAR PHONE
104.05
MN.
CELLULAR
TEL.
EQUIP RENTAL
37.35
MN.
CELLULAR
TEL.
EQUIP RENTAL
30.90
MN.
CELLULAR
TEL.
EQUIP RENTAL
21.08
MN.
CELLULAR
TEL.
EQUIP RENTAL
14.25
MN.
CELLULAR
TEL.
EQUIP RENTAL
11.74
MN.
CELLULAR
TEL.
EQUIP RENTAL
137.50
MN.
CELLULAR
TEL.
EQUIP RENTAL
37.21
MN.
CELLULAR
TEL.
EQUIP RENTAL
697.03
50.50
MN.
CONWAY
MAINT
46.00
MN.
CONWAY
-SAFETY EQUIP
249.00
MN.
CONWAY
FIRE GEAR /JACKET
83.81
MN.
CONWAY
SERVICE
429.31
89.30
MN.
ELEVATOR
SERVICE CONTRACT
89.30
55.72
10- 4504 - 301-30
MN.
GLOVE
185.79
40- 4504 - 801 -80
MN.
GLOVE
241.51
*
87289
67.15
10- 4210 - 140 -14
MN
SUBURBAN NEWS
20.65
10- 4210 - 140 -14
MN
SUBURBAN NEWS
22.40
10- 4540 - 560 -56
MN
SUBURBAN NEWS
110.20
*
104994
6870
81.89
10- 4540 - 560 -56
MN.
TORO INC.
203.31
27- 1340 - 000 -00
MN.
TORO INC.
102.04
MN.
TORO INC.
8,067.00
MN.
TORO INC.
i
05 -07 -90 PAGE 23
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
27- 4624 - 663 -66 5511
27- 4624 - 663 -66
28- 4624 - 703 -70
10- 4504 - 318 -30 29024 6017
10- 4204 - 100 -10
10- 4204 - 140 -14
10- 4226 - 420 -42
10- 4226 - 420 -42
10- 4226 - 420 -42
10- 4226 - 420 -42
10- 4226 - 420 -42
10- 4226- 420 -42
10- 4226 - 420 -42
10- 4226 - 420 -42
10- 4274 - 440 -44 145946
10- 4642 - 420 -42 145947
1074901 - 440 -44 15165 7219
27- 4288 - 662 -66 145907 7183
30- 4288 - 782 -78 30415 7124
GLOVES
10- 4504 - 301-30
42208
7010
GLOVES /SAFETY
40- 4504 - 801 -80
41277
6927
AD FOR BIDS
10- 4210 - 140 -14
87289
ADS FOR BIDS
10- 4210 - 140 -14
87290
OFFICIAL PUBLICATION
10- 4210 - 140 -14
87291
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
106274
6872
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
104994
6870
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
105207
6872
NEW MOWERS
27- 1340 - 000 -00
105477
6685
* ** -CKS
kkk -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1990 '-!,-Y
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
127M81
04/30/90
47.52
MN. TORO INC.
IRRIGATION PARTS
127M81
04/30/90
320.00
MN. TORO INC.
IRRIGATION PARTS
127M81
04/24/90
61.20
MN. TORO INC.
IRRIGATION PARTS
8,882.96
127M90
05/01/90
136.38
MODEL STONE CO.
CONCRETE
136.38
127M91
04/24/90
211.04
MODERN EQUIPMENT
REPAIR PARTS
211.04
127M92
05/01/90
4.20
MONARCH MARKETING
MARKING MACHINE
4.20
127M93
05/01/90
52.00
MOTOROLA
TELETYPE SERV
52.00
127M97
05/01/90
1,183.16
MPLS FINANCE DEPT.
SIGNAL COSTS
127M97
05/01/90
539.80
MPLS FINANCE DEPT.
SIGNAL COSTS
127M97
04/24/90
4,542.08
MPLS FINANCE DEPT.
WATER PURCHASED
6,265.04
127NO3
04/24/90
360.00
MPLS SEWER & WATER
STOP BOX REPAIR
360.00
*
* * * * **
127NO7
04/26/90
10.00
MTS NW SOUND
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10.00
*
* * * * **
127NO9
04/24/90
53.50
MUNICILITE CO.
REPAIR WORK
127NO9
04/24/90
76.98
MUNICILITE CO.
SPOT LIGHT
130.48
127N13
04/24/90
43.45
MUZAK
ADVERTISING
127N13
04/24/90
43.45
MUZAK
ADVERTISING
86.90
127N14
04/24/90
33.33
NARCOFFICER
ADVERTISING
127N14
04/24/90
33.33
NARCOFFICER
ADVERTISING
127N14
04/24/90
33.34
NARCOFFICER
ADVERTISING
100.00
* * * * **
127N16
04/26/90
1,557.00
NSP
AC TRANSFORMER
05 -07 -90 PAGE 24
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
27- 4540 - 664 -66 107937 7117
27- 4540- 664 -66 107984 7192
27- 4540 - 664 -66 104587 6835
* ** -CKS
40- 4504 - 803 -80 83243 7098
10- 4540 - 560 -56 7018
50- 4516 - 860 -86 417488
10- 4268 - 420 -42
* ** -CKS
10- 4252 - 330 =30 047017
10- 4252 - 330 -30 047017
40- 4640 - 803 -80
* ** -CKS
40- 4248 - 803 -80 21027 7099
* ** -CKS
30- 4504 - 782 -78 82425 1324
* ** -CKS
10- 4620 - 560 -56 2093 6631
10- 4620 - 560 -56 2120 7023
50- 4214 - 822 -82 10905M
50- 4214 - 862 -86 103005
50- 4214 - 822 -82
50- 4214 - 842 -84
50- 4214 - 862 -86
23- 1300 - 001 -00 71452
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
05 -07 -90
PAGE 25
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
#
MESSAGE
1,557.00
*xxx *k
* ** -CKS
127N21
04/24/90
25.40
NAPA AUTO
PARTS
GAUGE
10- 4504 - 325 -30
414851
7020
127N2i
04/24/90
75.69
NAPA AUTO
PARTS
PUMP ASSY
10- 4540 - 560 -56
414792
7148
127N21
04/30/90
26.61
NAPA AUTO
PARTS
FILTER
10 =4540- 560 -56
388722
7181
127N21
04/24/90
103.10
NAPA AUTO
PARTS
FITTINGS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
413072
6913
127N21
04/24/90
99.53
NAPA AUTO
PARTS
HOSE
10- 4540- 560 -56
402325
6257
1271g21
04/24/90
65.98-
NAPA AUTO
PARTS
CREDIT
10- 4540 - 560 -56
407377
'.27N21
04/24/90
325.30-
NAPA AUTO
PARTS
CREDIT
10- 4540 - 560 -56
384860
127N21
04/24/90
63.89
NAPA AUTO
PARTS
TRANS PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
414526
6995
127N21
04/24/90
33.43
NAPA AUTO
PARTS
TRANS PARTS
10- 4540- 560 -56
414544
6995
i27N21
04/24/90
33.72
NAPA AUTO
PARTS
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
408712
6715
127N21
04/24/90
121.80 i2i.88
-
NAPA AUTO
PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
583838
4470
127N21
04/24/90
29.36
NAPA AUTO
PARTS
AIR FILTER
10- 4540 - 560 -56
413094
6916
127N21
04/24/90
76.17
NAPA AUTO
PARTS
TRAN KIT
10- 4540 - 560 -56
386389
7075
127N21
04/24/90
9.50
NAPA AUTO
PARTS
BRACKETS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
410017
6799
127N21
04/24/90
251.39
NAPA AUTO
PARTS
AIR FILTER
10- 4620- 560 -56
413393
6926
127N21
04/30/90
329.70
NAPA AUTO
PARTS
TORCH
10- 4620- 560 -56
388744
7341
127N21
04/24/90
8.29
NAPA AUTO
PARTS
GLASS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
414863
7022
896.30* - 886 .88- x
127N22
04/30/90
280.00
NATL GUARDIAN
SYS.
AC ALARM SYST
10- 4248 - 646 -64
219935
7419
127N22
05/01/90
161.14
NATL GUARDIAN
SYS.
ALARM
27- 4304 - 662 -66.
127N22
05/01/90
473.99
NATL GUARDIAN
SYS.
ALARM
27- 4304 - 662 -66
127N22
05/01/90
233.63
NATL GUARDIAN
SYS.
ALARM SERVICE
50- 4304 - 841 -84
220672
1,148.76
xxk -CKS
127N33
04/24/90
129.00
NELSON RADIO.COMM
SIREN REPAIR
.10- 4620 - 560 -56
15727
6988
129.00
*k * *x*
* ** -CKS.
127N48
04/30/90
363.06
NO STAR TURF
SHOVELS /RACKS
27- 4504 - 664 -66
204250
6490
127N48
04/24/90
64.87
NO STAR TURF
PARTS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
213350
6899
427.93
* M
* ** -CKS
127N82
04/24/90
70.54
NW GRAPHIC
SUPPLY
COST /GOODS SOLD
23- 4624 - 613 -61
171043
6756
127N82
04/24/90
57.12
NW GRAPHIC
SUPPLY
COST /GOODS SOLD
23- 4624 - 613 -61
171440
7056
127N82
04/24/90
31.30
NW GRAPHIC
SUPPLY
COST /GOODS SOLD
23- 4624 - 613 -61
171244
6906
127N82
04/24/90
93.92
NW GRAPHIC
SUPPLY
COST /GOODS SOLD
23- 4624 - 613 -61
171232
6906
127N82
05/01/90
224.85
NW GRAPHIC
SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
171547
7058
477.73
*xk * **
* ** -CKS
127N94
04/24/90
18.33
MN. AMVETS
NEWS
ADVERTISING
50- 4214 - 822 -82
127N94
04/24/90
18.33
MN. AMVETS
NEWS
ADVERTISING
50- 4214 - 842 -84
127N94
04/24/90
18.34
MN. AMVETS
NEWS
ADVERTISING
50- 4214 - 862 -86
55.00
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
24.63
PBE
CHECK
REGISTER
6914
05 -07 -90 PAGE 26
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
PBE
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O.
# MESSAGE
54.50
PBE
AIR VALVE
10- 4540 - 560 -56
432317 4270
127P24
04/30/90
80.18
* ** -CKS
127017
04/30/90
22.00
7017
OFFICE
PRODUCTS
CABLE
10- 4504- 510 -51
106996
BEACON LIGHT
127017
04/30/90
108.00
04/24/90
OFFICE
PRODUCTS
MOUSE PORT PS /2
10- 4901 - 510 -51
107793
6680
127017
04/30/90
3,377.00
OFFICE
PRODUCTS
COMPUTER
10- 4901 - 600 -60
108241
6299
127017
04/30/90
383.00
CASH
OFFICE
PRODUCTS
COMPUTER
10- 4902 - 434 -43
108241
6299
127017
04/30/90
171.00
10- 4208 - 480 -48
OFFICE
PRODUCTS
SERIAL PORT PS /2
10- 4902 - 510 -51
108533
6680
MILEAGE
10- 4208 - 490 -49
4,061.00
05/01/90
3.97
PETTY
CASH
PLANNING EXP
'10- 4212- 510 -51
* * * * **
127036 04/26/90 65.98 OLSON CHAIN & CABLE REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 98083 7129
127036 04/30/90 94.74 OLSON CHAIN & CABLE REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540- 664 -66 98084 7213
160.72 *
* * * * **
127P24
04/24/90
24.63
PBE
PARTS
10- 4540- 560 -56
6914
127P24
04/24/90
170.00-
PBE
CREDIT
10- 4540 - 560 -56
9555
127P24
04/24/90
54.50
PBE
AIR VALVE
10- 4540 - 560 -56
432317 4270
127P24
04/30/90
80.18
PBE
MIRROR
10- 4540 - 560 -56
7017
127P,24
04/24/90
63.75
PBE
BEACON LIGHT
10- 4620 - 560 -56
4995
127P24
04/24/90
31.54
PBE
LENS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
6546
127P24
04/24/90
19.45
PBE
LENS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
6546
127P36
05/01/90
104.05
PETTY
CASH
MILEAGE
10- 4208 - 160 -16
* * * * **
127P30
05/01/90
235.20
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
PEPSI
27- 4504 - 664 -66
10- 4208 - 480 -48
127P36
05/01/90
235.20
PETTY
CASH
MILEAGE
10- 4208 - 490 -49
* * * k k k
127P36
05/01/90
11.48
PETTY
CASH
MTG EXPENSES
10- 4202 - 260 -26
127P36
05/01/£0
12.69
PETTY
CASH
MTG EXPENSES
10- 4202 - 600 -60
127P36
05 /01 /�-0
1.25
PETTY
CASH
BUS FARE
10- 4204- 200 -20
127P36
05/01/90
56.22
PETTY
CASH
STAFF MEETING
10- 4206 - 140 -14
127P36
05/01/90
46.27
PETTY
CASH
MEETING EXPENSES
10- 4206 - 200 -20
127P36
05/01/90
12•.85
PETTY
CASH
MEETING EXPENSES
10- 4206 - 260 -26
127P36
05/01/90
2.80
PETTY
CASH
MEETING EXPENSES
10- 4206 - 500 -50
127P36
05/01/90
19.89
PETTY
CASH
MILEAGE
10- 4208 - 160 -16
127P36
05/01/90
21.10
PETTY
CASH
MILEAGE
10- 4208 - 480 -48
127P36
05/01/90
18.64
PETTY
CASH
MILEAGE
10- 4208 - 490 -49
127P36
05/01/90
3.97
PETTY
CASH
PLANNING EXP
'10- 4212- 510 -51
127P36
05/01/90
35.71
PETTY
CASH
PHONE BILLS
10- 4256 - 140 -14
127P36
05/01/90
1.05
PETTY
CASH
POSTAGE
10- 4290 - 140 -14
127P36
05/01/90
2.90
PETTY
CASH
POSTAGE
10- 4290 - 800 -80
127P36
05/01/90
11.45
PETTY
CASH
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 140 -14
127P36
05/01/90
16.59
PETTY
CASH
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 200 -20
127P36
05/01/90
17.50
PETTY
CASH
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 260 -26
127P36
05/01/90
24.90
PETTY
CASH
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 520 -52
127P36
05/01/90
23.02
PETTY
CASH
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 600 -60
127P36
05/01/90
7.00'
PETTY
CASH
PARKING
10- 4506 - 140 -14
127P36
05/01/90
6.50
PETTY
CASH
MEETING
10- 4506 - 200 -20
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
127P36
05/01/90
127P36
05/01/90
127P36
05/01/90
127P36
05/01/90
127P44
04/24/90
* * * * **
SUPPLIES
127P48
04/24/90
* * * * **
EXPENSES
127P52
04/24/90
127P58
05/01/90
* * * * **
127P64
04/24/90
127P64
05/01/90
* * * * **
127P66
05/01/90
* * * * **
MAINT CONTRACT
127P70
04/26/90
* * * * **
127P74
04/24/90
* * * * **
127P84
05/01/90
* * * * **
.127P93
04/24/90
05 -07 -90 PAGE 27
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4514 - 520 -52
10- 4596 - 627 -62
12- 4206 - 434 -43
28- 4504 - 702 -70
* ** -CKS
10- 4274 - 440 -44 D20837 5053
* ** -CKS
30- 4600- 781 -78 6989 7245
* ** -CKS
10- 4290 - 510 -51 744502
* ** -CKS
28- 4504 - 702 -70 101464
* ** -CKS
10- 4500 - 500 -50 021826 7205
28- 4504 - 702 -70 021874 7053
* ** -CKS
10- 4266 - 430 -42
* ** -CKS
10- 4290 - 510 -51
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 = 140 -14 026105
* ** -CKS
28- 4600 - 701 -70 33055 6886
* ** -CKS
30- 4202 - 781 -78 7137
CHECK REGISTER
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
1.42
PETTY CASH
SUPPLIES
6.50
PETTY CASH
SUPPLIES
70.58
PETTY CASH
EXPENSES
3.93
PETTY CASH
SUPPLIES
436.21
345.00
PHYSIO CONTROL
MAINT CONTRACT
345.00
*
36.20
PIP PRINTING
PRINTING
36.20
*
376.00..
PITNEY BOWES
EQUIP MAINT
376.00
27.20
PLUNKETTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
27.20
120.00
POMMER CO
VOLUNTEER RECPTN
71.65
POMMER CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
191.65
110.00
PONY EXP RELOADERS•
UNIFORMS
110.00
3,000.00
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE
3,000.00
*
50.00
PRECISION BUS SYSTEM
HEADSETS
50.00
*
255.00
PRO INSTANT PRINT
PRINTING /SHOW
255.00
*
59.00
PRYOR RESOURCES INC
CONFERENCE
05 -07 -90 PAGE 27
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4514 - 520 -52
10- 4596 - 627 -62
12- 4206 - 434 -43
28- 4504 - 702 -70
* ** -CKS
10- 4274 - 440 -44 D20837 5053
* ** -CKS
30- 4600- 781 -78 6989 7245
* ** -CKS
10- 4290 - 510 -51 744502
* ** -CKS
28- 4504 - 702 -70 101464
* ** -CKS
10- 4500 - 500 -50 021826 7205
28- 4504 - 702 -70 021874 7053
* ** -CKS
10- 4266 - 430 -42
* ** -CKS
10- 4290 - 510 -51
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 = 140 -14 026105
* ** -CKS
28- 4600 - 701 -70 33055 6886
* ** -CKS
30- 4202 - 781 -78 7137
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
05 -07 -90
PAGE 28
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
# MESSAGE
59.00
*
**w*ww
***_CKS
127Q20
04/30/90
21.27
QUICK SERV BATTERY
FILTERS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
35436
6552
21.27
*
******
*** -CKS
127Q22
05/01/90
22.60
QUIK PRINT
PRINTING
28- 4600 - 701 -70
037677
7138
22.60
*
w**w**
* **-CKS
127R01
05/01/90
40.65
R & R SPECIALTIES
REPAIR PARTS
28- 4248 - 704 -70
13123
6900
127R01
05/01/90
358.15
R & R SPECIALTIES
REPAIR PARTS
28- 4248 - 704 -70
13122
7374
127R01
05/01/90
99.65
R & R SPECIALTIES
REPAIR PARTS
28- 4248 - 704 -70
13027
6820
498.45
.*** -CKS
127R12
04/24/90
75.90
RADIO SHACK
SMOKE DETECTOR
10- 4540 - 520 -52
913966
6979
127R12
04/24/30
7.34
RADIO SHACK
PARTS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
17681
7072
127R12
04/24/90
13.83
RADIO SHACK
SCREWDRIVER
10- 4540 - 540 -54
17456
6996
127R12
04/30/90
8.07 -8.9@.
-
RADIO SHACK
SWITCHES
10- 4540 - 560 -56
15432
7168
127R12
04/24/90
5.68
RADIO SHACK
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 646 -64
17344
6944
110.82*
$" w
*w*x**
*** -CKS
127R21
04/24/90
662.65
RED WING SHOES
SHOES
10- 4642 - 301 -30
205011
127R21
04/24/90
295.65
RED WING SHOES
SHOES
10- 4642 - 646 -64
205011
127R21
04/24/90
177.55
RED WING SHOES
SHOES
40- 4642 - 801 -80
205011
1,135.85
*
127R22
04/24/90
REM SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
1093
7242
127R22
04/24/90
.193.50
69.07
REM SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
1086
7243
127R22
04/24/90
432.00
REM SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
1119
7295
694.57
*
******
*** -CKS
127831
292
nD
RETATI DATA SYS MN
REPAIR RUMP
�$_TA �40���
210_667¢
127R31
05/01/90
111.81
RETAIL DATA SYS MN
REGISTER TAPE
50- 4516- 840 -84
1630
111.81* "594.91 -*
w***ww
*** -CKS
127R47
04/30/90
69.95
ROAD MACHINERY
CABLE
10- 4540 - 560 -56
6940
69.95
*
ww**w*
***-CKS
127R49
04/24/90
108.00-
ROAD RESCUE
CREDIT
10- 4620 - 560 -56
2145
3258
127R49
04/24/90
353.35
ROAD RESCUE
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
40037
7147
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK
REGISTER
05 -07 -90
PAGE 29
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
#
MESSAGE
127R49
04/24/90
136.63
ROAD RESCUE
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
30009
5910
127R49
04/24/90,,
36.86-
ROAD RESCUE
FLASHER
10- 4620 - 560 -56
2214
127R49
04/24/90
15.47
ROAD RESCUE
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
30054
6348
127R49
04/24/90
34.26-
ROAD RESCUE
CREDIT
10- 4620 - 560 -56
2144
326.33
*
xxxxxx
xxx'CKS
127R65
04/24/90
31.09
ROLLINS OIL CO.
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
31111
6211
31.09
*
xxxxxx
* ** -CKS
127R81
04/30/90
205.14
RUBENSTEIN & ZIFF
CRAFT SUPPLIES
23- 4588 - 611 -61
164018
7304
127R81
04/24/90
216.38
RUBENSTEIN & ZIFF
COST /GOODS SOLD
23- 4624 - 613 -61
162880
6904
421.52
xxxxxx
* ** -CKS
127SO3
04/30/90
10.87
S.T. ROBB
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 646 -64
52869
7155
10.87
*
127SO4
04/24/90
24.82
SATTERLEE
MATERIAL
10- 4580 - 301 -30
6806
24.82
*
xxxxxx
_
xxx -CKS
127S10
04/24/90
81.00
SUBURBAN TIRE &
AUTO
RAD TUBE
10- 4610 - 560 -56
8056
7145
127SIO
04/30/90
103.32
SUBURBAN TIRE &
AUTO
PARTS
10- 4616 - 560 -56
8399
7258
127S10
04/24/90
516.60
SUBURBAN TIRE &
AUTO
TIRES
10- 4616 - 560 -56
8035
6997
127SIO
04/24/90
1,131.18
SUBURBAN TIRE &
AUTO
TIRES
10- 4616 - 560 -56
8038
6816
127SIO
04/30/90
258.30
SUBURBAN TIRE &
AUTO
PARTS
10- 4616 - 560 -56
8269
7171
127SIO
04/24/90
194.84
SUBURBAN TIRE &
AUTO
TIRES
10- 4616 - 560 -56
7397-
6566
2,285.24
*
127S11
04/26/90
146.00
SCHMIDT MUSIC
MUSIC SUPPLIES
10- 4596 - 627 - 62620731
7383
146.00
*
xxx -CKS
127S15
05/01/90
102.14
SEARS
TOOLS
27- 4580 - 664 -66
6472
127S15
04/24/90
67.49
SEARS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
6887
169.63
127S16
04/30/90
28.21
SOFTWARE ETC
BOOKS
10- 4504 - 510 -51
70209
28.21
xxxxxx
xxx -CKS
127S25
04/24/90
216.00
OTIS SPUNKMEYER
INC
COST /GOODS SOLD
28- 4624 - 703 -70
4H1602
7060
216.00
xxxxxx
xxx -CKS
127S27
04/24/90
122.67
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
PAINIT SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 325 -30
25833
6782
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
10.06
CHECK REGISTER
PAUL
BOOK
05 -07 -90 PAGE 30
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
127S45
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
127S27
04/24/90
87.00
10- 4504 - 325 -30
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
THINNER
10- 4504 - 335 -30
26175 6803
27.15
10- 4248 - 560 -56
209.67
PAUL
BOOK
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 540 -54
10941
r * * **
127S45
05/01/90
127.49
STREICHERS
ST.
PAUL
* ** -CKS
127S34
04/24/90
15.04
5628
SOUTHDALE FORD
TUBE ASSY
10- 4540 - 560 -56
236912
127S34
04/24/90
15.99
MAILERS
SOUTHDALE FORD
TUBE OIL
10- 4540 - 560 -56
236867
43.88
200.32
31.03
CHEVROLET
PIPE
10- 4540 - 560 -56
124153
127S77
* * *x* * ** -CKS
127545
04/24/90
10.06
ST.
PAUL
BOOK
NAME TAGS
10- 4500 - 500 -50
011858
3,208.00
127S45
04/24/90
2P.25
10- 4201 - 504 -50
ST.
PAUL
BOOK
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 325 -30
557
6860
127545
04/30/90
27.15
10- 4248 - 560 -56
ST.
PAUL
BOOK
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 540 -54
10941
7081
127S45
05/01/90
127.49
STREICHERS
ST.
PAUL
BOOK
OFFICE SUPPLIES
27- 4516- 667 -66
921142
5628
127S45
04/24/90
6.37
M70026 7146
ST.
PAUL
BOOK
MAILERS
40- 4504 - 801 -80
11860
7169
04/24/90
43.88
200.32
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
PIPE
10- 4540 - 560 -56
124153
127S77
04/24/90
20.47
* * * * **
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
VALVE
10- 4540 - 560 -56
124123
127S77
04/24/90
48.08
* ** -CKS
127S51
05/01/90
123.60
124024
ST
PAUL
CANDY /TOBAC
CIGARS
27- 4504 - 663 -66
CHEVROLET
5516
10- 4540 - 560 -56
124376
123.60
04/24/90
2.59-
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
FLYWHHEL
10- 4540 - 560 -56
124376
* * * * ** * ** -CKS
127S67
04/26/90
3,208.00
STORE FRONT
HUMAN SERVICES
10- 4201 - 504 -50
112305
127S67
04/24/90
3,208.00
108.00
STORE FRONT
HUMAN SERVICES
10- 4201 - 504 -50
112303
10- 4248 - 560 -56
7298
6,416.00
04/24/90
100.00
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
* * * * **
10- 4248 - 560 -56
100576
127S77
04/24/90
2.59
* ** -CKS
127572
05/01/90
120.00
124376
STREICHERS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42
M70675 7389
127572
04/24/90
64.95
10- 4540 - 560 -56
STREICHERS
DASHLAZER
10- 4620 - 560 -56
M70026 7146
SUBURBAN
184.95
*
10- 4540- 560 -56
124589
127S77
04/24/90
* * * * ** * ** -CKS
127S77
04/24/90
213.93
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
REPLACE EXTENSION
10- 4248 - 560 -56
7211
127577
04/30/90
108.00
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
REPAIR DOOR
10- 4248 - 560 -56
7298
127S77
04/24/90
100.00
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
TRANS REBULIT
10- 4248 - 560 -56
100576
127S77
04/24/90
2.59
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
FLYWHHEL
10- 4540 - 560 -56
124376
127S77
04/24/90
100.00
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
REPAIR WORK
10- 4540 - 560 -56
100706
127S77
04/24/90
136.50
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
CLUTCH
10- 4540- 560 -56
124589
127S77
04/24/90
43.88
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
PIPE
10- 4540 - 560 -56
124153
127S77
04/24/90
20.47
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
VALVE
10- 4540 - 560 -56
124123
127S77
04/24/90
48.08
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
124024
127S77
04/24/90
2.59
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
FLYWHEEL
10- 4540 - 560 -56
124376
127577
04/24/90
2.59-
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
FLYWHHEL
10- 4540 - 560 -56
124376
127577
04/24/90
51.41
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
FLYWHEEL
10- 4540 - 560 -56
124296
127S77
04/30/90
1.60
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
GUIDE
10- 4540 -560- 56.124747
127577
04/24/90
40.94
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
VALVE
10- 4540 - 560 -56
124580
127S77
04/24/90
14,999.00
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
S -10 BLAZER
10- 4901 - 440-44
60659 6523
15,866.40
*
127S78
04/24/90
61.56
SUBURBAN
PLUMB SUP
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
7002
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK•REGISTER
* ** -CKS
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
10- 4600 = 507 -50
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
127S78
04/24/90
297.02
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
VALVE /TRAP
127S78
04/24/90
118.77
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
VALVE /TUBE CUTTER
127S78
04/24/90
111.26-
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
CREDIT
127S78
04/30/90
110.23
10- 4201 - 644 -64
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
VALVE /TAPE
127S78
04/30/90
244.18
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
REPAIR PARTS
127S78
04/30/90
280.73
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
TOOLS
_
1,001.23
k *kkk k
127S86
04/24/90
23.80
SUPRA COLOR LABS
PHOTOGRAPHIC
127S86
04/24/90
4.00
SUPRA COLOR LABS
PHOTOGRAPHIC
k x x* x x
27.80
127S92
04/30/90
11.42
i
SYSTEM SUPPLY
RIBBONS
11.42
*
kkk * k k
127S97
05/01/90
5,868.44
SEH
'PRO SERV ENG
*kkk k
5,868.44
*
k
127T03
04/24/90
46.99
TARGET
GENERAL SUPPLIES
k k k k k k
46.99
*
127T05
04/30/90
88.00
THE PRINT SHOP
PROGRAMS
127T05
04/30/90
102.00
THE PRINT SHOP
PRINTING
190.00
127T06
04/30/90
135.00
T & D AUTO SUPPLY
CONVERTER
135.00
k k k k k k
127T08
04/24/90
97.41
TARGET
CHARCOAL
k
97.41
*
k k k k k
127T11
04/24/90
248.31
TESSMAN SEED & CHEM.
FERTILIZER
k k k k k k
248.31
*
127T13
04/24/90
960.00
TOM HORWATH
FORESTY
127T13
04/25/90
960.00-
TOM HORWATH
FORESTRY
.00
127T14
04/24/90
48.09
TEXGAS CORP.
PROPANE
_ _
05 07 90 PAGE 31
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4540 - 540 -54 6923
10- 4540 - 540 -54. 7170
10- 4540 - 540 -54
10- 4620 - 560 -56 7280
40- 4540 - 801 -80 7026
40- 4580 - 803 -80 6941
* ** -CKS
10- 4508 - 420 -42 290896
10- 4508 - 420 -42 290615
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 510 -51 40555 4616
* ** -CKS
40- 4201 - 800 -80 7214
* ** -CKS
23- 4504 - 612 -61
109859
* ** -CKS
10- 4500 - 500 -50
91793 7130
10- 4600 = 507 -50
91819
10- 4540 - 560 -56
79883 7156
* *.* -CKS
27- 4504 - 663 -66
* ** -CKS
30- 4558 - 783 -78
49365 6603
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 644 -64
10- 4201 - 644 -64
10- 4504 - 301 -30
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
PROPANE
TOLL
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
COMPANY
k k* k k k
TOOLS
48.09
TOOL REPAIR
127T16
04/24/90
33.74 -vs.6
ELEVATOR
ELEVATOR SERVICE
33.74* ��-
TESTING
* k * k k *
PRO SERVICES
UHL CO
127T40
04/24/90
102.00
MED
127T40
04/24/90
102.94
MED
127T40
04/24/90
54.20
MED
SERV
OXYGEN
259.14
MED
127T42
04/24/90
20.20
MED
127T42
04/24/90
294.87
315.07
kkkkk k
127T53
04/24/90
5,025.25
127T53
04/24/90
7,760.18
* k k * * k
12,785.43
127T66
04/24/90
88.73
127T66
04/24/90
31.24
kkkkk
119.97
127T82
04/24/90
61.43
kkkkk k
61.43
127T91
04/24/90
1,764.66
kkkkk
1,764.66
*
127U17
04/24/90
188.00
kkkkk
188.00
*
127U25
04/26/90
29.70
127U25
04/24/90
28.49
127U15
04/24/90
28.49
127U25
04/24/90
28.49
127U25
04/24/90
152.25
267.42
0
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
TIERNEY BROS INC MAP BOOK SUPPLIES
TOLL
COMPANY
PROPANE
TOLL
COMPANY
PROPANE
TOLL
COMPANY
OXYGEN
TOOLS
BY OLSEN
TOOL REPAIR
TOOLS
BY OLSEN
SUPPLIES
TRACY OIL
GASOLINE
TRACY OIL
GASOLINE
TRIARCO ARTS
& CRAFT
CRAFT SUPPLIES
TRIARCO ARTS
& CRAFT
CRAFT SUPPLIES
TWIN CITY
ELEVATOR
ELEVATOR SERVICE
TWIN CITY
TESTING
PRO SERVICES
UHL CO
CALIBRATION,
UNIVERSAL
MED
SERV
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
UNIVERSAL
MED
SERV
OXYGEN
UNIVERSAL
MED
SERV
OXYGEN
UNIVERSAL
MED
SERV
UNIVERSAL
MED
SERV
_OXYGEN
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
05 -07 -90 PAGE 32
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 440 -44 49362
* ** -CKS
10- 4610- 560 -56 490841.7012
10- 4616 - 560 -56 110597 7001
27- 4580 - 664 -66 36608 7050
* ** -CKS
27- 4248 - 664 -66 25079 7129
27- 4504 - 664 -66 25078 7129
* ** -CKS
10- 4612- 560 -56 T17896
10- 4612 - 560 -56 T17897
* ** -CKS
23- 4588 - 611 -61 375381 6758
23- 4588 - 611 -61 344570 3156
* ** -CKS
10- 4248 - 520 -52 12965
* ** -CKS
40- 4201 - 801 -80 4977
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 540 -54 59269 8131
* ** -CKS
10- 4510 - 420 -42 2700
10- 4510 - 440 -44 759414 5805
10- 4510 - 440 -44 759326
10- 4510 - 440 -44 759269 5805
10- 4510 - 440 -44 002701 6076
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
05 -07 -90
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
* *rtwkk
127V15
04/24/90
487.43
*k *rtw*
487.45
* ** -CKS
127V30
04/30/90
415.00
305223
127V30
04/26/90
120.82 - r29.98
127V30
04/30/90
383.35
** *-CKS
127V30
04/24/90
102.60
11126
127V30
04/24/90
800.00
1,829.95
k
* w * k * rt
011110
1,821.77*
127V43
04/24/90
166..55
11127
127V43
04/24/90
339.06
LITE REPAIR
127V43
04/24/90
208.21
127V43
04/24/90
137.86
11104
* k
851.68
127V46
04/26/90
1,425.64
* ** -CKS
VERSATILE VEHICLE
CART PARTS
1,425.64
6341
127W08
04/30/90
164.80
CART PARTS
krt * * *w
6279
164.80
127W11
05/01/90
381.60
6313
6960
381.60
CART PARTS
27- 4540 - 665 -66
6288
6950
127W13
05/01/90
6,848.77
* k rt w w
* ** -CKS
6,848.77
PARTS
127W41
04/24/90
539.37
* * w rt * x
539.37
12,W44
04/2x/90
135.26
REPAIR PARTS
127-444
04/24/90
80.85
k k w k k w
216.11
CHECK REGISTER
05 -07 -90
PAGE 33
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
#
MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
VAN PAPER CO.
PAPER SUPPLIES
10- 4514 - 520 -52
305223
7048
** *-CKS
VANTAGE ELECTRIC
ELECTRICAL
10- 4248 - 646 -64
11126
7407
VANTAGE ELECTRIC
REPAIR AC SIGN
10- 4248 - 646 -64
011110
7382
VANTAGE ELECTRIC
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 646 -64
11127
VANTAGE ELECTRIC
LITE REPAIR
27- 4248 - 662 -66
011112
7308
VANTAGE ELECTRIC
PROF SERVICES
30- 4201 - 782 -78
11104
6883
* ** -CKS
VERSATILE VEHICLE
CART PARTS
27- 4540 - 665 -66
6341
7062
VERSATILE VEHICLE
CART PARTS
27- 4540 - 665 -66
6279
6823
VERSATILE VEHICLE
CART PARTS
27- 4540 - 665 -66
6313
6960
VERSATILE VEHICLE
CART PARTS
27- 4540 - 665 -66
6288
6950
* ** -CKS
VESSCO
PARTS
40- 4540 - 805 -80
7776
7091
* ** -CKS
W.W. GRAINGER
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
7292
* ** -CKS
W. GORDON SMITH
GASOLINE
27- 4612 - 664 -66
41675
7386
* ** -CKS
WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP
REPAIRS
40- 4248 - 801 -80
102170
* ** -CKS
WEST PHOTO
PHOTOGRAPHIC
10- 4508 - 420 -42
36622
6969
* ** -CKS
WEST WELD SUPPLY CO.
PARTS
10- 4580 - 560 -56
83323
7025
WEST WELD SUPPLY CO.
ELECTRODE
10- 4610 - 560 -56
83474
6873
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
127W49
04/30/90
456.42
WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
xx**x*
456.42
127W71
04/30/90
568.25
WINFIELD DEVEL.
RENT
568.25
127W76
05/01/90
930.00
WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY
PENCILS
127W76
04/24/90
94.96
WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY
MAT TEES
1,024.96
127W81
04/30/90
49.45
WM H MCCOY
PROPANE
49.45
******
127X05
04/24/90
510.00
XEROX CORP.
XEROX SUPPLIES
127X05
04/24/90
113.49
XEROX CORP.
XEROX SUPPLIES
* k x * x n
623.49
*..
127Z05
04/24/90
34.70
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
1ST AID
127Z05
04/24/90
77.20
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
127Z05
04/30/90
65.40
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
SAFETY SUPPLIES
A
177.30
127Z14
04/24/90
55.21
ZIEGLER INC
BODY GP
55.21
410,715.37
419;
-83
FUND 10 TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
682.73
FUND 12 TOTAL
COMMUNICATIONS
56,674.33
FUND 23 TOTAL
ART CENTER
38,604.99
38-- 685.9?
FUND 27 TOTAL
GOLF COURSE FUND
4,677.18
FUND 28 TOTAL
RECREATION CENTER FUND
71.54
FUND 29 TOTAL
GUN RANGE FUND
11,381.12
FUND 30 TOTAL
EDINBOROUGH PARK
254,676.91
FUND 40 TOTAL
UTILITY FUND
5,466.57
FUND 41 TOTAL
STORM SEWER UTILITY
5,095.75
3,895.44
FUND 50 TOTAL
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
32,231.00
FUND 60 TOTAL
CONSTRUCTION FUND
820,277.49*
°20 "GG
'
'^
TOTAL
05 -07 -90 PAGE 34
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4504- 560 -56 23001 7287
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 627 -62 101842
*x* -CKS
27- 4516 - 661 -66 23560 5982
27- 4540 - 666 -66 27998 6830
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 314 -30 39855 7247
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 510 -51
10- 4504- 510 -51
27- 4504 - 662 -66 7239
27- 4504 - 664 -66 6964
30- 4642- 781 -78 7404
10- 4540 - 560 -56 6861
*** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
.f
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
.DATE
060700
03/29/90
wkkwkfi
06002
03/29/90
kwwkwk
' MANUAL
O61C33
03/29/90
061C33
03/29/90
wkkkkw
TELEPHONE
064827
03/29/90
k k k k k w
MANUAL
064A82
03/29/90
064A82
03/29/90
064A82
03/29/90
064A82
03/29/90
064A83
03/29/90
064A84
03/29/90
064A84
03/29/90
064A84
03/29/90
kkkwww
MANUAL
064M98
03/29/90
064M98.
03/29/90
064M98
03/29/90
064M98
03/29/90
064M98
03/29/90
064M98
03/29/90
064M98
03/29/90
064M98
03/29/90
064M98
03/29/90
064M98
03/29/90
064M98
03/29/90
064M98
03/29/90
064M98
03/29/90
064M98
03/29/90
064M98
03/29/90
kkkkwk
AMOUNT
40.00
40.00
65.00
65.00
125,000.00 -
125,000.00
.00
35.00
35.00
. CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
MN DEPT OF HEALTH FEE
LEAGUE /MN CITIES
CITY /EDINA
CITY /EDINA
NATL HIWAY_INST
REGISTRATION
PAYROLL TRANSFER
PAYROLL TRANSFER
REGISTRATION
61.18
03 -31 -90 PAGE 1
AT &T
TELEPHONE
2.90
MANUAL
AT &T
TELEPHONE
9.80
' MANUAL
AT &T
TELEPHONE
33.25
MANUAL
AT &T
TELEPHONE
107.13
*
10- 4202 - 260 -26
MANUAL
79.00
* ** -CKS
AT &T
TELEPHONE
79.00
*
27- 4256 - 667 -66
MANUAL
21.00
MANUAL
AT &T
TELEPHONE
10.50
_
AT &T
TELEPHONE
21.00
MANUAL
AT &T
TELEPHONE
52.50
MANUAL
10- 4254 - 520 -52
MANUAL
666.63
MANUAL
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
1,103.36
MANUAL
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
5,198.61
MANUAL
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
2,799.48
MANUAL
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
234.07
MANUAL
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
911.80
MANUAL
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
203.11
MANUAL
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
5,346.97
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
4,067.06
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
4,897.88
MINNEGACO
HEAT
304.14
MINNEGACO
HEAT.
2,792.84
MINNEGACO
HEAT
86.74
MINNEGACO
HEAT
239.58
MINNEGACO
HEAT
229.55
MINNEGACO
HEAT
29,081.82
* ** -CKS
03 -31 -90 PAGE 1
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4310 - 440 -44
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4202 - 100 -10
' MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50- 1010- 000 -00
MANUAL
50- 1010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4202 - 260 -26
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4256- 510 -51
MANUAL
27- 4256 - 622 -62
MANUAL
27- 4256 - 667 -66
MANUAL
30- 4256 - 782 -78
MANUAL
10- 4256 - 510 -51
MANUAL
40- 4256 - 801 -80
MANUAL
50- 4256 - 821 -82
MANUAL'
50- 4256 - 861 -86
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4254- 440 -44
MANUAL
10- 4254 - 520 -52
MANUAL
10- 4254 - 540 -54
MANUAL
10- 4254 2646 -64
MANUAL
23- 4254 - 612 -61
MANUAL
27- 4254 - 662 -66
MANUAL
27- 4254- 664 -66
MANUAL
27- 4254 - 667 -66
MANUAL
28- 4254- 702 -70
MANUAL
30- 4254- 782 -78
MANUAL
40- 4254 - 801 -80
MANUAL
40- 4254 - 803 -80
MANUAL
50- 4254 - 821 -82
MANUAL
50- 4254 - 841 -84
MANUAL
50- 4254- 861 -86
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
064N16
03/29/90
064N16
03/29/90
064N16
03/29/90
064N16
03/29/90
064N16
03/29/90
064N16
03/29/90
064N16
03/29/90
064N16
03/29/90
064N16
03/29/90
064N16
03/29/90
064N16
03/29/90
064N16
03/29/90
064N16
03/29/90
064N16
03/29/90
064N16
03/29/90
064N16
03/29/90
064N16
03/29/90
064N16
03/29/90
064N16
03/29/90
064N16
03/29/90
064N16
03/29/90
064N16
03/29/90
064N16
03/29/90
064N16
03/29/90
064N16
03/29/90
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
065EII
03/29/90
065EII
03/29/90
065EII
03/29/90
* * * * **
065E26
03/29/90
* * * * **
MANUAL
065F14
03/29/90
065F14
03/29/90
* * * * **
O66P32 03/29/90
* * * * **
068754 03/29/90
- 6
AMOUNT
25.07
85.70
24,447.93
3,143.67
2,405.87
1,047.80
47.18
1,389.39
2,143.86
4,163.68
716.61
43.38
1,224.10
166.90
900.67
6,542.85
427.40
5,962.97.
2,153.02
9,764.53
505.92
90.12
584.06
668.25
377.14
69,028.07
69.31
102.84
124.57
296.72
38.05
38.05
15,589.59
532.51
16.122.10
25,756.85
25,756.85
26.40
26.40
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
NSP
POWER
NSP
POWER
NSP
POWER
NSP
POWER
NSP
POWER
NSP
POWER
NSP
POWER
NSP
POWER
NSP
POWER
NSP
POWER
NSP
POWER
NSP
POWER
NSP
POWER
NSP
POWER
NSP
POWER
NSP
POWER
NSP
POWER
NSP
POWER
NSP
POWER
NSP
POWER
NSP
POWER
NSP
POWER
NSP
POWER
NSP
POWER
NSP
POWER
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
ED PHILLIPS
FIDELITY BANK
FIDELITY BANK
P.E.R.A.
HENN CTY DISR COURT
MIX
MIX
MIX
BEER
FICA
MEDICARE
PERA
FINES
03 -31 -90 PAGE 2
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4252 - 301 -30
MANUAL
10- 4252 - 321 -30
MANUAL
10- 4252 - 322 -30
MANUAL
10- 4252 - 330 -30
MANUAL
10- 4252 - 375 -30
MANUAL
10- 4252 - 440 -44
MANUAL
10- 4252 - 460 -46
MANUAL
10- .4252- 520 -52
MANUAL
1074252 - 540 -54
MANUAL
10- 4252 - 646 -64
MANUAL
23- 4252 = 612 -61
MANUAL
26- 4252 - 682 -68
MANUAL
27- 4252 - 662 -66
MANUAL
27- 4252 - 664 -66
MANUAL
27- 4252 - 667 -66
MANUAL
28- 4252 - 702 -70
MANUAL
29- 4252 - 722 -72
MANUAL
30 =4252- 782 -78
MANUAL
40- 4252 - 801 -80
MANUAL'
40- 4252 - 803 -80
MANUAL
41- 4252- 902 -90
MANUAL
41- 4252 - 902 -90
MANUAL
50- 4252 - 821 -82
MANUAL
50- 4252 - 841 -84
MANUAL
50- 4252- 861 -86
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50- 4632 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4632 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4632 - 862 -86
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50- 4630 - 862 -86
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10 -4149- 510 -51
MANUAL
10- 4162 - 510 -51
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4145 - 510 -51 MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4201.- 500 -50 MANUAL
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
* * * * **
068760 03/29/90
* * * * **
068A83
03/29/90
068A83
03/29/90
* * * * **
AMOUNT
068N16
03/29/90
068N16
03/29/90
068N16
03/29/90
SCHOOL
110.00
068P70
03/29/90
* * * * **
MANUAL
068U27
03/29/90
068U27
03/29/90
068U27
03/29/90
068U27
03/29/90
068U27
03/29/90
068U27
03/29/90
068U27
03/29/90
068U27
03/29/90
068U27
03/29/90
068U27
03/29/90
068U27
03/29/90
068U27
03/29/90
068U27
03/29/90
068U27
03/29/90
068U27
03/29/90
213.65
MANUAL
071769
03/29/90
AYR *i4*1Y
480.00
071B73
03/29/90
071673
03/29/90
071673
03/29/90
071873
03/29/90
071873
03/29/90
03 -31 -90 PAGE 3
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
***-CKS
10- 4248- 520 -52 MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL
23- 4256 - 612 -61 MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4252- 646 -64
MANUAL
40- 4252 - 801 -80
CHECK REGISTER
40- 4252 - 803 -80
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
110.00
DAKOTA CTY.TECH COLL
SCHOOL
110.00
10- 4256 - 622 -62
MANUAL
10- 4256 - 628 -62
MANUAL
17.29
MANUAL
AT &T
MANUAL
TELEPHONE
57.49
27- 4256- 664 -66
AT &T
28- 4256- 702 -70
TELEPHONE
74.78
MANUAL
30- 4256 - 782 -78
MANUAL
40- 4256 - 801 -80
107.17
40- 4256 - 803 -80
NSP
50- 4256- 821 -82
POWER
69.65
MANUAL
NSP
MANUAL
POWEWR
36.83
10- 4202 - 160 -16
NSP
POWER
213.65
MANUAL
27- 4202 - 661 -66
MANUAL
27- 4516- 661 -66
480.00
27- 4516 - 667 -66
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE
480.00
3,132.54
US WEST
COMM
TELEPHONE
426.59
US WEST
COMM
TELEPHONE
124.12
US WEST
COMM
TELEPHONE
209.21
US WEST
COMM
TELEPHONE
24.89
US WEST
COMM
TELEPHONE
466.03
US WEST
COMM
TELEPHONE
58.67
US WEST
COMM
TELEPHONE
139.18
US WEST
COMM
TELEPHONE
37.32
US WEST
COMM
TELEPHONE
50.77
US WEST
COMM
TELEPHONE
85.59
US WEST
COMM
TELEPHONE
80.15
US WEST
COMM
TELEPHONE
148.98
US WEST
COMM
TELEPHONE
176.23
US WEST
COMM
TELEPHONE
146.36
US WEST
COMM
TELEPHONE
5,306.63
*
190.00
COLLEGE /ST
THOMAS
SEMINAR
190.00
*
50.00
GC PETTY
CASH
RENTAL PROPERTY
50.00
GC PETTY
CASH
SCHOOL
82.00
GC PETTY
CASH
OFFICE SUPPLIES
294.45
GC PETTY
CASH.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
26.00
GC PETTY
CASH
PRINTING
03 -31 -90 PAGE 3
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
***-CKS
10- 4248- 520 -52 MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL
23- 4256 - 612 -61 MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4252- 646 -64
MANUAL
40- 4252 - 801 -80
MANUAL
40- 4252 - 803 -80
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4290 - 510 -51
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4256 - 510 -51
MANUAL
10- 4256 - 622 -62
MANUAL
10- 4256 - 628 -62
MANUAL
23- 4256 - 612 -61
MANUAL
26- 4256 - 682 -68
MANUAL
27- 4256 - 662 -66
MANUAL
27- 4256- 664 -66
MANUAL
28- 4256- 702 -70
MANUAL
29- 4256- 722 -72
MANUAL
30- 4256 - 782 -78
MANUAL
40- 4256 - 801 -80
MANUAL
40- 4256 - 803 -80
MANUAL
50- 4256- 821 -82
MANUAL
50- 4256 - 841 -84
MANUAL
50- 4256 - 861 -86
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4202 - 160 -16
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
27- 3230 - 662 -66
MANUAL
27- 4202 - 661 -66
MANUAL
27- 4516- 661 -66
MANUAL
27- 4516 - 667 -66
MANUAL
27- 4600 = 661 -66
MANUAL
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT
071B73
03/29/90
19.71
MANUAL
ED
PHILLIPS
522.16
*
31.17-
* ** -CKS
ED
PHILLIPS
071C47
03/29/90
835.40
MANUAL
ED
PHILLIPS
835.40
*
* * * * **
MANUAL
ED
PHILLIPS
073H83
03/29/90
70,000.00
MANUAL
ED
PHILLIPS
70,000.00
*
IY 1111 lk *11
MANUAL
ED
PHILLIPS
074666
04/10/90
1.18
-
074B66
04/10/90
77.42
04/10/90
074B66
04/10/90
78.60
PHILLIPS
074666
04/10/90
77.42-
MANUAL
ED
PHILLIPS
77.42
04/10/90
2,876.66
MANUAL
ED
PHILLIPS
074E11
04/10/90
1.18
-
074E11
04/10/90
15.95
-
074E11
04/10/90
4.36
-
074E11
04/10/90
5.10
-
074E11
04/10/90
6.17
-
074E11
04/10/90
8.46
-
074E11
04/10/90
10.92
-
074E11
04/10/90
217.99
074E11
04/10/90
58.90
074EII
04/10/90
797.48
074E11
04/10/90
254.95
074EII
04/10/90
308.50
074E11
04/10/90
547.08 - 446 --9.8-
074E11
04/10/90
422.99
074E11
03/29/90
81.09
2;636.84 2,695.84
--*
* * * * **
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
GC PETTY CASH CONCESSIONS
COMM LIFE INS LIFE INSURANCE
HRA TRANSFER
BRW ENTERPRISE
BRW ENTERPRISE
BRW ENTERPRISE
BRW ENTERPRISE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE MIX
074E26
04/10/90
15.11-
MANUAL
ED
PHILLIPS
074E26
04/10/90
31.17-
* ** -CKS
ED
PHILLIPS
074E26
04/10/90
4.36-
MANUAL
ED
PHILLIPS
074E26
04/10/90
2.73-
MANUAL
ED
PHILLIPS
074E26
04/10/90
57.53-
MANUAL
ED
PHILLIPS
074E26
04/10/90
755.51
MANUAL
ED
PHILLIPS
074E26
04/10/90
1,558.86
MANUAL
ED
PHILLIPS
074E26
04/10/90
136.64
MANUAL
ED
PHILLIPS
074E26
04/10/90
218.48
MANUAL
ED
PHILLIPS
074E26
04/10/90
2,876.66
MANUAL
ED
PHILLIPS
074E26
04/10/90
393.25
MANUAL
ED
PHILLIPS
074E26
04/10/90
503.00
ED
PHILLIPS
074E26
04/10/90
68.40
ED
PHILLIPS
03 -31 -90 PAGE 4
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
27- 4624 - 663 -66 MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4157- 510 -51 MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 1145- 000 -00 MANUAL
x**-CKS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4632- 842 -84
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 7822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
03 -31 -90 PAGE 5
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
074E26
04/10/90
436.95
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
074E26
04/10/90
844.06
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074E26
04/10/90
204.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074E26
04/10/90
856.08
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074E26
04/10/90
983.23
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074E26
04/10/90
304.05
ED PHILLIPS
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
074E26
04/10/90
757.67
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
10,785.94
074G82
04/10/90
8.00-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 822 -82
* ** -CKS
074G82
04/10/90'
11.48-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700- 842 -84
MANUAL
074G82
04/10/90
16.99-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074G82
04/10/90
15.36-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 862 -86
MANUAL
074G82
04/10/90
23.04-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
074G82
04/10/90
12.54-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074G82
04/10/90
93.34-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
074G82
04/10/90
159.90-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
074G82
04/10/90
1,152.10
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
074G82
04/10/90
627.22
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074G82
04/10/90
4,666.92
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
074G82
04/10/90
7,994.95
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
074G82
04/10/90
229.95-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074G82
04/10/90
.00
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074G82
04/10/90
.00
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074G82
04/10/90
93.00-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628-862 -86
MANUAL
074G82
04/10/90
.00
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
9-*
13,777.59*
* * * **
* ** -CKS
074J62
04/10/90
30.96-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
7.92-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
37.40-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822-82
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
2.52
--
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
8.88-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
2.38-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
11.08-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
10.35-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
98.62-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
7.95-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
10.17-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
.35-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
3.32-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
87.80-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
.87-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90 172.56
-;-8-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
3.75-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
8.12-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
8.23-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
7.70-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
12.28-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
8.23-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
8.23
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
1,869.25
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626'- 822 -82
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
03 -31 -90 PAGE 6
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
074J62.
04/10/90
9.81
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
1,548.10
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
8.33
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
4,390.49
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
28.18
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 842-84
, MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
4,931.14
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
32.34
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
613.76
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
2.94
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
8,643.95
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
146.44-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
48.51
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
890.25
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
5.39
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
6.86
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
791.70
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
236.75•
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
20.33-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
252.03
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
19.30-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
5.88
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
12.25
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
14.92-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
1,019.40
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
8.82
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
10.78
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
1,106.42
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
14.21
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
2.45
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
34.60
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074J62,
04/10/90
24.01
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
333.10
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
22.54
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
23.45-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
1,034.95
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
796.14
'JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
86.50
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
18.62
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
20.09
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
21.60
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
809.08-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
769.98
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
376.42
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
812.55
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
822.35
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90.
5.39
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
8.33
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
21.60-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
074J62
04/10/90
809.08
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
* * * * **
30,897.91*
* * * -CKS
074P20
04/10/90
2.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
074P20
04/10/90
63.65
PAUSTIS
& SONS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
03 -31 -90 PAGE 7
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
65.65
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
074P82
04110190
4.31-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
074P82
04/10/90
.79-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
074P82
04/10/90
7.47-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074P82
04/10/90
.79-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074P82
04/10/90
2.50-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
074P82
03/29/90
19.95
PRIOR WINE WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
074P82
04/10/90
195.50
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
074P82
04/10/90
39.29
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
074P82
04/10/90
.373.45
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074P82
04/10/90
39.29
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074P82
04/10/90
125.22
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
776.84
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
074Q16'
04/10/90
17.62-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
074Q16
04/10/90
12.76-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
074Q16
04/10/90
.54-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
074Q16
04/10/90
1.23-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
074Q16
04/10/90
4.92-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
074Q16
04/10/90
23.66-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
074Q16
04/10/90
26.38-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
074Q16
04/10/90
1.87-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074Q16
04/10/90
11.00-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074Q16
04/10/90
.82-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074Q16
04/10/90
.36-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074Q16
04/10/90
20.18-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074Q16
04/10/90
54.50-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074Q16
04/10/90
.98-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074Q16
04/10/90
4.88-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074Q16
04/10/90
5.87-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
074Q16
04/10/90
.69-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
074Q16
04/10/90
1.21-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
074Q16
04/10/90
148.70-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
074Q16
04/10/90
18.31-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
074Q16
04/10/90
1.31-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
074Q16
04/10/90
1.23-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
074Q16
04/10/90
9.06-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
074Q16
04/10/90
1,182.21
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL.
074Q16
04/10/90
881.53
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
074Q16
04/10/90
93.36
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074Q16
04/10/90
2,724.86
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074Q16
04/10/90
1,319.35
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074Q16
04/10/90
243.86
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
074Q16
04/10/90
914.80
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
074Q16
04/10/90
7,433.99
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
074Q16
04/10/90
123.00
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
074Q16
04/10/90
54.15
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
074Q16
04/10/90
1,272.60
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
074Q16
04/10/90
489.40
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
074Q16
04/10/90
35.50
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
161.71
# P.O. # MESSAGE
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
TAX
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
074Q16
04/10/90
1,097.75
COMM
QUALITY WINE
074Q16
04/10/90
97.90
07BC51
QUALITY WINE
074Q16
04/10/90
81.90
OF
QUALITY WINE
074Q16
04/10/90
2,010.50
03/29/90
QUALITY WINE
074Q16
04/10/90
121.00
REV
QUALITY WINE
074Q16
04/10/90
585.45
98.29
QUALITY WINE
074Q16
04/10/90
130.50
SALES
QUALITY WINE
074Q16
04/10/90
68.40
10- 3357 - 000 -00
QUALITY WINE
074Q16
04/10/90
905.55
TAX
QUALITY WINE
074Q16
04/10/90
123.00
COMM
QUALITY WINE
REV
SALES
21,622.48
078C51
03/29/90
R R R R R R
50- 3357 - 003 -00
COMM
OF
REV
074T22
04/10/90
423.30
03/29/90
THE WINE COMPANY
074T22
04/10/90
6.00
REV
THE WINE COMPANY
TAX
078C51
429.30
9,783.27
R * k * R R
074T49 04/10/90 198.90 TOW DISTRIBUTING
074T49 04/10/90 2.25 TOW DISTRIBUTING
201.15
* R R R k R
075C33 03/29/90 118,000.00 CITY /EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER
075C33 03/29/90 118,000.00- CITY /EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER
.00 *
R R R R R R
078719 03/29/90 40.00 MICHAEL MONGE SPEAKER FEES
40.00 *
k k k R R R
078C51
03/29/90
161.71
# P.O. # MESSAGE
COMM
OF
REV
SALES
TAX
078C51
03/29/90
130.73
50- 4628 - 862 -86
COMM
OF
REV
SALES
TAX
07BC51
03/29/90
5,149.91
MANUAL
COMM
OF
REV
SALES
TAX
078C51
03/29/90
642.70
COMM
OF
REV
SALES
TAX
078C51
03/29/90
98.29
MANUAL
COMM
OF
REV
SALES
TAX
078C51
03/29/90
571.32
10- 3357 - 000 -00
COMM
OF
REV
SALES
TAX
078C51
03/29/90
704.48
MANUAL
COMM
OF
REV
SALES
TAX
078C51
03/29/90
5,542.26
50- 3357 - 003 -00
COMM
OF
REV
SALES
TAX
078C51
03/29/90
10,518.67
COMM
OF
REV
SALES
TAX
078C51
03/29/90
9,783.27
COMM
OF
REV
SALES
TAX
33,303.34
*
RRRRRR
078P70
03/29/90
180.00
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE
180.00
*
k R k k k R
* ** -CKS
10- 4290 - 510 -51 MANUAL
* ** -CKS
03 -31 -90 PAGE 8
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86'
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50- 4628 - 842-84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50- 1010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
50- 1010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4206 - 430 -42
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
23- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
27- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
28- 3357- 000 -00
MANUAL
29- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
30- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
40- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
50- 3357 - 001 -00
MANUAL
50- 3357 - 002 -00
MANUAL
50- 3357 - 003 -00
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4290 - 510 -51 MANUAL
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
03 -31 -90 PAGE 9
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
079729
03/29/90
50.00
FOOD MKTG INSTITUE
FMI CONVENTION
50- 4202 - 820 -82
MANUAL
079729
03/29/90
75.00
FOOD MKTG INSTITUE
FMI CONVENTION
50- 4202 - 840 -84
MANUAL
079729
03/29/90
75.00
FOOD MKTG INSTITUE
FMI CONVENTION
50- 4202 - 860 -86
MANUAL
200.00
*
1
079730
03/29/90
15.00
STATE TREAS /MN
EXAM FEE
40- 4202 - 809 -80
MANUAL
15.00
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
079E11
04/10/90
1.11-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
079E11
04/10/90
.97-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
079E11
04110190
5.04-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
079EII
04/10/90
18.43-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
079EII
04/10/90
3.51-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
079E11
04/10/90
16.90-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
079E11
04/10/90
48.54
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
079E11
04/10/90
55.50
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
079EII
04/10/90
252.00
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
079E11
04/10/90
921.41
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
079E11
03/29/90
1.00-
EGLE W
CREDIT
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
079E11
04/10/90
175.50
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
079E11
04/10/90
845.12
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
079E11
03/29/90
89.50
EAGLE WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 862 -86
MANUAL
2,340.61
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
079E26
04/10/90
5.59-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
079E26
04/10/90
1.79-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
079E26
04/10/90
4.74-
ED.PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
079E26
04/10/90
4.65-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
079E26
04/10/90
10.92-
ED.PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
079E26
04/10/90
279.61
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
079E26
04/10/90
89.90
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
079E26
04/10/90
237.46
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
079E26
04/10/90
232.69
ED PHILLIPS
50 -4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
079E26
04/10/90
546.20
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
079E26
04/10/90
17.40-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
079E26
04/10/90
778.76
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
079E26
04/10/90
227.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
079E26
04/10/90
715.35
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
079E26
04/10/90
1,137.85
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
079E26
04/10/90
98.75
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
079E26
04/10/90
509.63
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
079E26
04/10/90
973.65
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
079E26
04/10/90
986.58
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
079E26
04/10/90
258.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
079E26
04/10/90
560.45
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
079E26
04/10/90
505.95
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
079E26
03/29/90
151.50
ED PHILLIPS
BEER
50- 4630 - 842 -84
MANUAL
079E26
03/29/90
182.20
ED PHILLIPS
MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
MANUAL
079E26
03/29/90
43.50
ED PHILLIPS
MIX
50- 4632 7862 -86
MANUAL
8,469.94
1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -31 -90 PAGE 10
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* * * * **
079F14
03/29/90
14,975.33
FIDELITY BANK FICA
10- 4149 - 510 -51
079F14
03/29/90
518.39
FIDELITY
BANK MEDICARE
10- 4162 - 510 -51
15,493.72
* * * * **
079G82
04/10/90
34.83-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3700 - 822 -82
079G82
04/10/90
10.49-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3700 - 822 -82
079G82
04/10/90
18.00-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 822 -82
079G82
04/10/90
32.67-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 822 -82
079G82
04/10/90
30.00-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
079G82
04/10/90
59.28-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
079G82
04/10/90
47.36-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 862 -86
079G82
04/10/90
899.85
GRIGGS;COOPER
50- 4626 - 822 -82
079G82
04/10/90
1,633.32
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 822 -82
079G82
04/10/90
1,499.75
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626.- 842 -84
079G82
04/10/90
2,963.94
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
079G82
04/10/90
2,368.19
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 862 -86
079G82
04/10/90
79.00-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 822 -82
079G82
04/10/90
58.90-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 822 -82
079G82
04/10/90
.00
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 822 -82
079G82
04/10/90
.00
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 822 -82
079G82
04/10/90
34.59-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 862 -86
8,959.93
**k *kR
079J62
04/10/90
16.52-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3700 - 842 -84
079J62
04/10/90
2.22-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
079J62
04/10/90
1.09-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
079J62
04/10/90
31.93-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
079J62
04/10/90
1.90
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
079J62
04/10/90
1.90-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
079J62
04/10/90
.42-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
079J62
04/10/90
6.24-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
079J62
04/10/90
6.65-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
079J62
04/10/90
5.22-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
079J62
04/10/90
48.65-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
079J62
04/10/90
33.08-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
079J62
04/10/90
3.56-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
07SJ62
04/10/90
1.69-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
079J62
04/10/90
3.45-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
079J62
04/10/90
1,596.47
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
079J62
04/10/90
10.29
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
079J62
03/29/90
.30-
JOHNSON
WINE CREDIT
50- 4626 - 842 -84
079J62
04/10/90
2,433.63
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626- 842 -84
079J62
04/10/90
16.91
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626- 842 -84
079J62
04/10/90
8.82
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
079J62
04/10/90
1,654.49
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
079J62
04/10/90
1.96-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
079J62
04/10/90
1.96
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
079J62
04/10/90
109.98-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
03 -31 -90 PAGE 11
CHECK NO.
DATE AMOUNT
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
079J62
04/10/90
109.98
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
079J62
04/10/90
.98
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
079J62
04/10/90
42.03
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
079J62
04/10/90
222.27
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
079J62
04/10/90
109.98
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
079J62
04/10/90
1.96
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
079J62
04/10/90
5.39
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
079J62
04/10/90
7.35
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
079J62
04/10/90
522.32
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
079J62
04/10/90
.00
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
079J62
04/10/90
12.74
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
079J62
04/10/90
625.30
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
079J62
04/10/90
15.19
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
079J62
04/10/90 618.63-4&a-6T
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
079J62
04/10/90
169.31
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
079J62
04/10/90
4.41
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
079J62
04/10/90
355.60
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
079J62
04/10/90
346.55
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
079J62
04/10/90
9.31
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
079J62
04/10/90
4.41
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
079J62
03/29/90
77.93
JOHNSON WINE BEER
50- 4630 - 842 -84
MANUAL
—6,756.
25-
.�� **
8,711.55*
* * *_ CKS
079P82
04/10/90
3.61-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
079P82
04/10/90
16.15-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
079P82
04/10/90
.90-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
079P82
04/10/90
7.05-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
079P82
04/10/90
180.32
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
079P82
.e?,9p82
04/10/90
e4,,te�se
807.40
952.65
PRIOR WINE
PRIeR WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
079P82
04/10/90
44.95
PRIOR WINE
50 4628 862 86
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
MANUAL
079P82
04/10/90
352.64
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
079P82
03/29/90
98.44
PRIOR WINE MIX
50- 4632 - 822 -82
MANUAL
- 1,866
-*
*+ * **
1,456.04*
* * *_ CKS
079Q16
04/10/90
5.70-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82•
MANUAL
079Q16
04/10/90
27.22-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
079Q16
04/10/90
4.07-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
079Q16
04/10/90
.49-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
079Q16
04/10/90
1.32-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL'
079Q16
04/10/90
.46-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
079Q16
04/10/90
2.46-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
079Q16
04/10/90
9.06-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
079Q16
04/10/90
.44-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
079Q16
04/10/90
67.59-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
079Q16
04/10/90
8.54-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
079Q16
04/10/90
.46
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
079Q16
04/10/90
5.70-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
079Q16
04/10/90
12.20-
QUALITY -WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
079Q16
04/10/90
8.36-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 = 862 -86
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
26,083.92
MANUAL
P.E.R.A.
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
03/29/90
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
079Q16
04/10/90
WEST
.49-
QUALITY
WINE
079Q16
04/10/90
1,361.39
2.46
QUALITY
WINE
079Q16
04/10/90
3,379.01
3.78
QUALITY
WINE
079Q16
04/10/90
609.61
30.81
QUALITY
WINE
079Q16
04/10/90
48.95
2.85
QUALITY
WINE
079Q16
04/10/90
569.50
3.32
QUALITY
WINE
07,9Q16
04/10/90
406.25
43
QUALITY
WINE
079Q16
04/10/90
43.50
QUALITY
WINE
079Q16
04/10/90
43.50
QUALITY.
WINE
079016
04/10/90
- 130.50
QUALITY
WINE
079Q16
04/10/90
903.50
QUALITY
WINE
079Q16
04/10/90
43.50-
QUALITY
WINE
079Q16
04/10/90
246.00
QUALITY
WINE
079Q16
04/10/90
854.25
QUALITY
WINE
079Q16
04/10/90
48.95
QUALITY
WINE
079Q16
04/10/90
569.50
QUALITY
WINE
079Q16
04/10/90
834.20
QUALITY
WINE
9,851.47
*
k * * k k k
080731 03/29/90 70.00 NATL HIWAY INST COURSE
70.00 *
* * * * * *
081732 03/29/90 200.00 TRAVEL PRO CONT ED
200.00 *
081733 03/29/90 795.00 EXPL POST 911 CONT ED
795.00 *
081P32
03/29/90
26,083.92
MANUAL
P.E.R.A.
PERA
COMM
TELEPHONE
26,083.92
03/29/90
119.55
MANUAL
* * * *k*
WEST
COMM
TELEPHONE
082U27
03/29/90
082A82
03/29/90
2.46
WEST
AT &T
TELEPHONE
082A82
03/29/90
3.78
MANUAL
AT &T
TELEPHONE
082A82
03/29/90
30.81
03/29/90
AT &T
TELEPHONE
082A82
03/29/90
2.85
TELEPHONE
AT &T
TELEPHONE
082A82
03/29/90
3.32
WEST
AT &T
TELEPHONE
082U27
03/29/90
43
.22
US
WEST
* * k * *
082U27
03/29/90
723.42
MANUAL
US
WEST
COMM
TELEPHONE
082U27
03/29/90
119.55
MANUAL
US
WEST
COMM
TELEPHONE
082U27
03/29/90
23.20
MANUAL
US
WEST
COMM
TELEPHONE
082U27
03/29/90
45.53
MANUAL
US
WEST
COMM
TELEPHONE
082U27
03/29/90
16.06
US
WEST
COMM
TELEPHONE
082U27
03/29/90
32.99
US
WEST
COMM
TELEPHONE
082U27
03/29/90
240.06
US
WEST
COMM
TELEPHONE
03 -31 -90 PAGE 12
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50 -4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4202 - 260 -26 MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4202 - 430 -42 MANUAL
10- 4202-430 -42 MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4145 7510 -51 MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4256 - 510 -51
MANUAL
23- 4256- 612 -61
MANUAL
27- 4256 - 662 -66
MANUAL
27- 4256- 667 -66
MANUAL
40- 4256 - 803 -80
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4256 - 510 -51
MANUAL
10- 4256 - 622 -62
MANUAL
10- 4256 - 628 -62
MANUAL
10- 4256 - 646 -64
MANUAL
23- 4256 - 612 -61
MANUAL
27- 4256.- 662 -66
MANUAL
27- 4256 - 667 -66
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
55.81-
GRIGGS
CHECK
REGISTER
085G82
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
COOPER
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV
082U27
03/29/90
141.96
50- 3700 - 862 -86
US WEST COMM
TELEPHONE
28- 4256 - 702 -70
082U27
03/29/90
183.80
085G82
US WEST COMM
TELEPHONE
30- 4256 - 782 -78
082U27
03/29/90
490.31
04/10/90
US WEST COMM
TELEPHONE
40- 4256 - 803 -80
082U27
03/29/90
16.06
71.01-
US WEST COMM
TELEPHONE
50- 4256 - 821 -82
082U27
03/29/90
16.06
GRIGGS
US WEST COMM
TELEPHONE
50- 4256 - 841 -84
082U27
03/29/90
16.06
COOPER
US WEST COMM
TELEPHONE
50- 4256 - 861 -86
3,997.13
GRIGGS
2,065.06
50- 4626- 842 -84
k k k k k
085E11
04/10/90
6.79-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
085EII
04/10/90
3.86-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
085E11
04/10/90
4.51-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
085E11
04/10/90
12.18-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
085E11
04/10/90
3.86-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
085EII
04/10/90
339.33
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
085EII
04/10/90
193.00
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
085E11
04/10/90
225.72
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
085E11
04/10/90
608.99
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
085E11
04/10/90
193.00
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
1,528.84
kkk*k*
085E26
04/10/90
6.89-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
085E26
04/10/90
7.19-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
085E26
04/10/90
7.27-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
085E26
04/10/90
344.60
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 822 -82
085E26
04/10/90.
359.76
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 842 -84
085E26
04/10/90
363.86
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626- 862 -86
085E26
04/10/90
182.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
085E26
04/10/90
40.30
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
085E26
04/10/90
342.72
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
085E26
04/10/90
17.10
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
085E26
04/10/90
128.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
085E26
04/10/90
243:74
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
085E26
04/10/90
674.65
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
085E26
04/10/90
209.15
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
085E26
04/10/90
556.90
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
085E26
04/10/90
449.32
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
085E26
03/29/90
14.50
ED PHILLIPS
MIX
50- 4632 - 862 -86
3,905.25
*
k k k k k
085G82
04/10/90
55.81-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3700- 842 -84
085G82
04/10/90
9.99-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3700 - 842 -84
085G82
04/10/90
30.77-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3700 - 862 -86
085G82
04/10/90
19.67-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3700 - 862 -86
085G82
04/10/90
22.74-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710- 822 -82
085G82
04/10/90
79.94-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
085G82
04/10/90
71.01-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 862 -86
085G82
04/10/90
18.00-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 862 -86
085G82
04/10/90
1,136.82
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 822 -82
085G82
04/10/90
3,997.13
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626- 842 -84
03 -31 -90 PAGE 13
# P.O. # MESSAGE
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
03 -31 -90 PAGE 14
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
085G82
04/10/90
3,550.34
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
085G82
04/10/90
899.85
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
085G82
04/10/90
.00
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
085682
04/10/90
.00
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
085682
04/10/90
.00
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
085G82
04/10/90
.00
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
9,276.21
085J62.
04/10/90
45.00
JOHNSON WINE
50 -4628 842 84
* ** -CKS
085J62
04/10/90
6.78-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3700 - 842 -84
MANUAL
085J62
04/10/90
5.96-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
085J62
04/10/90
10.05-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
085J62
04/10/90
3.20-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
085J62
04/10/90
55.24-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
085J62
04/10/90
1.16-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 =84
MANUAL
085J62
04/10/90
7.47-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
085J62
04/10/90
6.07-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
085J62
04/10/90
8.81-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
085J62
04/10/90
2.94
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
085362
04/10/90
502.45
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
085J62
04/10/90
2,762.24
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
085J62
04/10/90
18.13
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
085J62
04/10/90
6.37
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
085J62
04/10/90
7.84
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
085J62
04/10/90
598.77
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
085J62
04/10/90
318.13
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
085J62
04/10/90
6.78
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
085J62
04/10/90
746.74
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
085J62
04/10/90
115.91
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
085J62
04/10/90
6.78-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
085J62
04/10/90
1.96
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
085J62
04/10/90
.00
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
085J62
04/10/90
18.13
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
085J62
04/10/90
14.21
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
085J62
04/10/90
607.49
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
085762
04/10/90
881.44
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
085J62
04/10/90
10.78
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
085J62
04/10/90
3.43-
6,sia.22
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
6,550.36*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
085N12
03/29/90
2,329.96
MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE INSURANCE
10- 4158 - 510 -51
MANUAL
2,329.96
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
085P20
04/10/90
73.20
PAUSTIS & SONS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
085P20
04/10/90
3.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
085P20
04/10/90
3.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
085P20
04/10/90
93.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
085P20
04/10/90
182.75
PAUSTIS & SONS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
085P20
04/10/90
4.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
50- 4628.- 862 -86
MANUAL
358.95
*
1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -31 -90 PAGE 15
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* * * * **
085P82
085P82
085P82
085P82
085P82
085P82
085P82
085P82
085P82
* * * * **
085Q16
085Q16
085Q16
085Q16
085Q16
085Q16
085Q16
085Q16
085Q16
085Q16
085Q16
085Q16
085Q16
085Q16
085Q16
085Q16
085Q16
085Q16
085Q16
085Q16
085Q16
085Q16
04/10/90
2.14-
088700
PRIOR
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
04/10/90
7.23-
089C33
PRIOR
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
04/10/90
4.76-
PRIOR
WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
04/10/90
87.12
PRIOR
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
03/29/90
19.95
PRIOR
WINE MIX
50- 4628 - 822 -82
04/10/90
361.49
PRIOR
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
04/10/90
238.08
PRIOR
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
03/29/90
36.21
PRIOR
WINE MIX
50- 4632 - 822 -82
03/29/90
36.21
PRIOR
WINE MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
764.93
*
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
* * * * **
088700
03/29/90
088701
03/29/90
* * * * **
089C33
04/05/90
089C33
04/05/90
* * * * **
3.10 -
.26-
4.56-
.98-
7.95-
32.94-
5.36-
1.32-
26.12-
.49-
2.84-
398.09
.00
1,647.42
1,306.55
25.50
455.10
97.90
533.65
282.80
130.50
48.95
4.840.54
1,200.00
1,200.00 *
525.00
525.00 *
110,000.00-
110,000.00
.00
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
DENISON
MN DEPT OF HEALTH
CITY /EDINA
CITY /EDINA
POSTAGE
LAB CERT
PAYROLL TRANSFER
PAYROLL TRANSFER
50- 3700 - 822 -82
50- 3710 - 822 -82
50- 3710 - 822 -82
50- 3710 - 822 -82
50- 3710 - 822 -82
50- 3710- 842 -84
50- 3710 - 842 -84
50- 3710 - 862 -86
50- 3710 - 862 -86
50- 3710 - 862 -86
50- 3710 - 862 -86
50- 4626 - 822 -82
50- 4626 - 822 -82
50- 4626 - 842 -84
50- 4626- 862 -86
50- 4628 - 822 -82
50- 4628 - 822 -82
50- 4628 - 822 -82
50- 4628 - 842 -84
50- 4628 - 862 -86
50- 4628 - 862 -86
50- 4628 - 862 -86
10- 4290 - 510 -51
10- 4200 - 482 -48
50- 1010 - 000 -00
50- 1010 - 000 -00
9
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
089G86 04/05/90
R R R R R R
089M24 04/05/90
R R R R R R
089P42
R R R R R R
093E11
093EII
093E11
093E11
093E11
093E11
093E11
093E11
093E26
093E26
093E26
093E26
093E26
093E26
093E26
093E26
093E26
093E26
093E26
093E26
093E26
093E26
093E26
093E26
093E26
093E26
R R R R R R
04/05/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90•
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
04/10/90
AMOUNT
14,105.91
14,105.91 *
16,782.20
16,782.20 *
21,927.50
21,927.50
1.84 -
.60-
5.81-
15.98-
92.00
290.49
30.00,
799.04
1,187.30
2.60 -
4.57-
19.30-
1.57-
38.41-
965.33
228.63
1,920.82
78.67
.00
156.65
136.80
131.95
296.30
511.55
177.00
523.30
397.30
5,457.85
093G82 04/10/90 11.02 -
093G82 04/10/90 7.92 -
093G82 04/10/90 13.90 -
093G82 04/10/90 66.34-
093682 04/10/90 60.83-
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE
MEDCENTER
PHP
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
GRIGGS COOPER
GRIGGS COOPER
GRIGGS COOPER
GRIGGS COOPER
GRIGGS COOPER
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
03 -31 -90 PAGE 16
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4156 - 510 -51 MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4156 - 510 -51 MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4156 - 510 -51 MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50- 3700 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842, -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50- 3700 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3700 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3700 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
6.68-
.26-
JOHNSON WINE
CHECK REGISTER
093J62
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
JOHNSON WINE
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV
093G82
04/10/90
3,316.80
JOHNSON WINE
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
093G82
04/10/90
3,041.27
50- 3710 - 842 -84
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 862 -86
093G82
04/10/90
50- 3710 - 842 -84
.00
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 822 -82
093G82
04/10/90
093J62
.00
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 842 -84
093G82
04/10/90
04/10/90
.00
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 862 -86
093J62
04/10/90
6.198.06
1,299.16
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
093J62
093J62
04/10/90
6.68-
.26-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3700 - 842 -84
093J62
04/10/90
2.34-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
093J62
04/10/90
46.06-
04/10/90
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
093J62
04/10/90
12.91-
093Q16
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
093J62
04/10/90
4.15-
50- 3710 - 842 -84
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
093J62
04/10/90
70.16-
WINE
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
093J62
04/10/90
4.77-
QUALITY
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
093J62
04/10/90
17.15
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
093J62
04/10/90
2,303.09
1,299.16
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
093J62
04/10/90
3,507.61
04/10/90
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
093J62
04/10/90
21.56
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
093J62
04/10/90
234.44
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
093J62
04/10/90
5.39
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
093J62
04/10/90
33.78-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
093J62
04/10/90
.00
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
093J62
04/10/90
27.93
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
093J62
04/10/90
1,292.81
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
093J62
04/10/90
4.41
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
093J62
04/10/90
415.75
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
093J62
04/10/90
6.14-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
093J62
04/10/90.
476.77
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
093J62
04/10/90
2.48-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
093J62
04/10/90
11.27
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
8,128.71
* * * * **
093P82
04/10/90
3.20-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
093P82
04/10/90
4.95-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
093P82
04/10/90
6.39-
PRIOR.WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
093P82
04/10/90
159.76
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
093P82
04/10/90
247.40
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
093P82
04/10/90
319.57
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
712.19
* * * * **
093Q16
04/10/90
.26-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
093Q16
04/10/90
.33-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
093016
04/10/90
25.99-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
093Q16
04/10/90
3.91-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
093Q16
04/10/90
.66-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
093Q16
04/10/90
8.12-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
093Q16
04/10/90
71.44-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
093Q16
04/10/90
1,299.16
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626- 842 -84
093Q16
04/10/90
3,572.36
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626- 862 -86
03 -31 -90 PAGE 17
# P.O. # MESSAGE
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK
REGISTER-
03 -31 -90 PAGE 18
CHECK NO.
DATE'
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
093Q16
04/10/90
32.75
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
093Q16
04/10/90
25.50
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
093Q16
04/10/90
65.00
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
093Q16
04/10/90
388.25
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
093Q16
04/10/90
808.75.
QUALI -TY WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
6,081.06
* * * * **
* * * -CKS
267,085.95
FUND 10 TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
1,367.95
FUND 23 TOTAL
ART CENTER
68.27
FUND 26 TOTAL
SWIMMING POOL FUND
15,269.73
FUND 27 TOTAL
GOLF COURSE FUND
11,533.75
FUND 28 TOTAL
RECREATION CENTER FUND
563.01
FUND 29 TOTAL
GUN RANGE FUND
11,699.99
FUND 30 TOTAL
EDINBOROUGH PARK
16,520.86
FUND 40 TOTAL
UTILITY FUND
596.04
FUND 41 TOTAL
STORM SEWER UTILITY
205,166.15
295,525.3i- "FUND
50 TOTAL
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
^'^ ^
'
°6
TOTAL
529,871.70*
tl