Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-05-07_COUNCIL PACKETf' Y MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA. CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL APRIL 2, 1990 ROL CALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor Richards. VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION WEEK PROCLAIMED Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Smith for adoption of the following proclamation: PROCLAMATION - VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION WEEK WHEREAS, volunteers have enriched the life of our community through their concern, commitment, and generosity of spirit; and WHEREAS, volunteers are a vital resource to provide for the well -being of our community and its citizens; and WHEREAS, volunteerism embodies a spirit of giving and spirit of growth; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina is proud of the efforts of our volunteers and.wishes to thank them for their dedicated service; NOW, THEREFORE I, Frederick S. Richards, Mayor of Edina, Minnesota, do hereby proclaim the week of April 15 - 21, 1990, as: VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION WEEK ADOPTED this 2nd day of April, 1990. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Notion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 5 AND JOINT HRA /COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 19, 1990 APPROVED Notion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to approve the Minutes of the Regular March 5 and Joint HRA /Council Meeting of March 19, 1990. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED ON THE DESIGNATION OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND APPROVAL OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS ADOPTED Gordon Hughes, Assistant City Manager,. advised that notice of this hearing was published.and sent to the School Board, to the Board of Commissioners of Hennepin County, and also to property owners in the proposed districts although this is not a requirement. The three areas for consideration are: 1. 44th Street and France Avenue 2. Valley View Road and Wooddale Avenue 3. 70th Street and Cahill Road The development program and tax increment financing plans comprise the legal documents which establish the districts. Plans are required prior to the establishment of T.I.F. Districts and the plans are conceptual and not final. Establishment of T.I.F. Districts is the basis for estimating public costs and tax increment revenues and a framework for deciding the location and the amount of future public expenditures. Mr. Hughes stated that these plans rely ultimately on market place decisions. He noted that these development /redevelopment plans do not constitute rezonings, amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, site plans, or an authorization to acquire private property. These are not the only plans, property owners /developers may propose different plans for these districts and public hearings would have to be held. Fred Hoisington, of the Hoisington Group, a consulting planner who has prepared land use -plans for the site was introduced by Assistant Manager Hughes also introduced was J. Peter Meyers who has assisted the City as liaison with the business community. Mr. Hoisington inquired about how much background should be presented to the audience, with a reminder that a number of people had not seen the proposal. Mayor Richards told Mr. Hoisington to go through the plans again to familiarize everyone with what the development plans propose. Mr. Hoisington stated that consultants like to look at the plans for the three areas in a planners view. Problems and needs of these areas are as follows by area: 44th Street and France Avenue - The plan presented stressed a concept more than a physical plan with a change in density of housing on the north side of 44th Street, yet maintaining the character, ownership and architecture of the area. The area closest to 44th has a lack of parking while buildings in back have a surplus of spaces. Steep slopes pose a problem in developing parking in this area. Rehabilitation of the area was mentioned. Mr. Hoisington described a redevelopment of the area south of Sunnyside Road which would include a retail center of 15,000- 20,000 sq.ft, and an office building of 8,000- 10,000 sq. ft. Wooddale Avenue and Valley View - Streets are 61st, Kellogg, and Oaklawn. Landmarks are a large multi - family building, day -care center /office building, shopping center and gas station. Mr. Hoisington pointed out the dangers of the area; risks for pedestrians, parking and circulation of traffic. Some unsightly uses exist, while roads do not meet State Aid standards. The conceptual plan, shows a possible expansion of the shopping center, clinic and drug store, with a refocusing of that location to the east. The conceptual plan also shows some restructuring and reorientation but retention of some business to reflect the Comprehensive Plan which states these types of districts should be contracted to a degree. A need was noted for Kellogg not to continue through to Valley View but a separation between retail and residential could be designed by creating a hammerhead cul -de -sac. Landscaping, with entry features, the widening of Wooddale from 30' to 32' -36 with turn -lanes would be an attempt to create identity for the area. 70th Street and Cahill Avenue - Streets in the area are West 70th Street, Cahill Road and Amundson Avenue. Landmarks are the old Cahill School, a multi - family housing unit and Cahill Shopping Center. Cahill Center, built in the '60's, has experienced some leasing difficulties because of the steep grade and dis- jointed buildings. The conceptual plan is if one building could be built, retailers could leverage off of each other. One approach for King's Court would be upgrading and expansion plus,the development of a single center with one building. The plan could would include possible vacation, addition of a cul -de -sac on Amundson with the result being the retention of the industrial and redevelopment of the center. One other idea is to eliminate the central building and link all buildings together. One main problem with this link would be the 7' grade between the buildings. Rehabilitation of these buildings is another possibility via low- interest loans. Assistant Manager Hughes spoke about the recommended action needed to adopt the Resolution which approves the development plan and the tax increment financing plans for each district. Mayor Richards commented that letters have been received, reproduced and circulated to all of the Council Members. He opened the Public Hearing and asked for comments and concerns from the audience. He stated the reason we are again looking at this is in the belief that the window of opportunity exists to give the City necessary tools to properly plan these commercial areas. There are no plans being decided upon-tonight, only the creating of tax increment districts under consideration, if the Council wishes. Dr. Philip Sidell, 3920 Sunnyside Road; Mary Jo Aiken, 4548 France Av. S.; Jim Van Valkenburg, attorney representing the Edina Cleaner's; Dr. Franklin Sidell, 3920 Sunnyside; Ruth Elwell, 4311 Eton Place; Bill Scholmak, Attorney representing Mr. Gold; Laura Plaetzer, 4058 Sunnyside Road; Walt Sandison, 4612 W. 58th St.; Bob Roster, owner of Roster's Service & Rentals on Valley View Road & Kellogg; Eric Kolsom, 3924 44th St. W; Lois Roen - Brickley, 6120 Kellogg spoke in opposition of the development tax increment financing districts. Steve Soltau, 6100 Oaklawn Av. spoke in favor of the creation of these districts. One member of the audience asked if one vote would be taken for all districts or votes taken individually. Mayor Richards commented that each area would be voted on individually. The question was asked if both sides of France Avenue would be involved. Assistant Manager Hughes answered that Minneapolis has been contacted about their embarking on their own tax increment plan and said he hoped they could later join efforts. Another question was whether the lines on the proposal could be expanded or contracted. Assistant Manager Hughes said it is more difficult to add a parcel to the district rather than delete it. Audience comments and concerns ranged from concern about property being taken, and concern over the nearly completed renovation of some properties, loss of business because of relocation, different levels of parking lots, traffic problems, the necessity of change, the concern for the maintaining of the unique charm and architecture, safety, the upgrading of Valley View was a often heard comment, landscaping would be desirable, and less population would be a plus. Mayor Richards asked for questions or concerns from the Council or audience. Member-Kelly asked J. Peter Meyer if he would explain what he has done with this proposal. J. Peter Meyers, stated he has spent 6 weeks representing the City as a liaison between the planner, involved parties and the City. Upon his recommendation, and with his attendance, one -on -one private meetings were held for those who had concerns or questions. Member.Kelly, asked Mr. Meyers what his assessment was of the meetings held. Mr. Meyers said there had been some lack of understanding, but with property owners input, questions began to arise and answers were attempted. Some property owners now represented directly, received answers from neighbors or via rumors and he felt some of the apprehension is being represented at this meeting. He said his job was to alleviate some of-that apprehension by the meetings. He feels the City is not taking advantage of the property owners, but offering a_tool that has been properly used by Edina in the past, with this being the opportunity to do that. Member Kelly asked again whether we are trying to reconstruct a blighted area or that we are meeting a social need for public good. Mr. Meyers said we are looking to the future, no one knew what the effect of Southdale would be when it was being developed either. Member Kelly expressed her thanks to Mr. Meyers for his work on this project. Member Rice mentioned about previously heard comments regarding 44th and some to .Valley View & Wooddale. At the last hearing, Mr. Rice said he felt there was less opposition at 70th & Cahill than at 44th and at Valley & Wooddale, and asked Mr. Meyers if he felt the same. Mr. Meyers concurred. Mayor Richards answered the question about the necessity of establishing this tax increment financing area, stating we need not do anything, and could let matters resolve themselves which would be an easier course, but he does not believe this is the right course. The do- nothing course would deprive property owners of an advantage that others have experienced and continue to experience with tax increment financing districts. Mayor Richards mentioned the bashing by legislators of Edina for the mis- handling of tax increment money, and being compared to Minneapolis. He stated that Edina has not and will not go that route. We are fiscally responsible in Edina and will remain so. Mayor Richards predicts some residents will come before the Council at a later date asking for help with public improvements and public monies and Council is proposing they do them all themselves. Again, we could do nothing, and miss the opportunity to create a situation to work with the private sector in trying to improve these areas. In answer to comments, about putting in a lot of money with no pay -back, Mayor Richards explained the City would not spend money unless we can be assured it can be captured in the tax increment financing district. In explanation to another comment heard regarding the ability to use these vehicles for financing of public improvements but not to give a subsidy to the private sector. Mayor Richards said if money is available it could pay for the public improvements, if not, those, public improvements are not done. The statement that we are engaged in deficit spending is not.accurate. Another comment heard about taking residential /private properties, philosophically, he would not support any private property being taken. He offered his support in the creation of these districts which would enable the private sector and remaining viable areas able to compete with other areas throughout the metropolitan area. Member Rice questioned a troubling comment that was heard regarding whether the free market process is inhibited if these districts are adopted. Assistant Manager Hughes answered that by adopting the plan, some properties or certain buyers could become undesirable or might chill a sale. On the other side, the presence of a property in a district tends to attract buyers rather than chill the buyers. Member Rice asked in which district was this the case. Mr. Hughes stated that at 50th & France, three homes south of the Peoples Plus station are included in the plan and were shown for multi - family housing, that housing has never occurred, yet sales on those houses have been brisk. Member Rice questioned about another comment regarding the expansion of a business and if this establishment of this district would be a detriment to this. Manager Hughes answered no, the plan shows an opportunity for expansion, and would add some credence of expanding the business rather than opposing a negative on it. This could vary property by property, retail opportunities could be enhanced rather than be reduced. Member Smith took exception to the comment that this establishment of a tax increment district idea was dreamed up in response to folks in St. Paul. He explained this issue was discussed last spring and may have forced us to adopt a schedule, and identify things that we could maintain such as viable retail areas. The intent was not to control what could be or could not be done with buildings in the area. Looking at the plans, we are shown the planner's view. Maintaining the vitality of the buildings and homes is the City's job. He stated he sees little wrong at 44th but would like to facilitate some fix -up of the area. One way this can be assured is to capture increments of tax between a certain date and a future date. This would not be developed by the City, nor would homes be purchased, this would be done by a developer with an interest in your property. Correspondence has been received regarding the Valley View area. Some property owners in that area have ideas of what they would like to see done. Member Smith commented that he does not want things to be razed, but is interested in options we have to invest in improving the area. In the 70th & Cahill area, we have seen a planners view. The owner of the property has begun doing some improvements, without asking for public money. He said his hope would be that the City would have the money for the property owner when he would be ready to improve the area, street wise, etc. The charm of these areas must be maintained, but somehow the City needs to be ready when the area needs the help. In answer to an audience question about trust of the Council to maintain the same posture. Member Smith stated it depends on the Council that you elect having your same views. He encouraged the audience to attend,Council meetings, write letters to the Council with their views, and to attend planning commission meetings when these issues are being decided upon. Member Jane Paulus stated the job of the City Council is to represent the whole City in long range planning, not only for today but for years in the future. Her perception of what she has heard tonight is mainly a 'me' point of view and is difficult to address one -on -one. Residential areas in Edina that seem to be appreciating the greatest in home value are those that have a neighborhood identity. People moving into these areas want a small area they can walk to, and seem to be bringing prime dollars back today into these areas. Member Paulus said these three areas hit these points very well. Member Peggy Kelly asked what were the four options. She said she has a difficult time with tax increment financing, she believes the private sector should be the risk -taker in a market - driven economy yet she had a concern a few years ago about the 44th & France area when Minneapolis was doing improvements on their side of the. Member Kelly commented that she is pleased with improvements she sees happening. She still hears comments about the beautiful way the 50th & France project turned out. During the time of the improvements with 50th & France the economic climate was different and she does not feel 44th & France has the same characteristics. The 70th &_ Wooddale area has two problems, the gas station and traffic. The Cahill development has been before the Council before, and said she is looking for some public assistance there to make it happen. Member Kelly said this is a hard decision but feels she must vote against the proposal. Member Rice asked if there was a timeline on these projects. Manager Hughes commented that the duration of the Wooddale & Valley View district and the 70th & Cahill district would be a maximum of 10 years from the day of its establishment or at most 8 years of increments. 44th & France could last a maximum of 25 years. Member Rice questioned if the vote taken tonight would be to establish these districts. Manager Hughes stated yes. Member Rice asked if at any time in the next few years more planning could be initiated with no effective date. Member Hughes commented that there is a four -year, knock -out provision, which means if a parcel is not benefitted by a public project or through tax increment financing within four years of establishment, that parcel drops out of the district. If later, for instance in the fifth year, it could then come.in to the district but just for three more years, until the conclusion of the district. Member Rice said that he agrees with many comments heard, but does not agree with the taking of property. He believes the planner working with the City has responded well but think the plans are too aggressive. He said if he were drawing the lines or putting in uses, he would do them differently. He commented he has heard conflicting comments such as, save my business, even though it is unsightly, and don't touch this facility, it generates 2,000 cars per week, and then don't do anything that will increase traffic. He stated he is in favor of the establishment of these districts, as it gives the City an option. There are no mandates to do anything at any time, but the opportunity and option to work with the single family and property owners in these areas. One interesting comment was made that this would be a catalyst to spur more examination of these areas and establishing cooperation between private and public sector. Some visions for the futures of these areas must be seen. Member Rice stated he would vote in favor of these proposals. Member Smith inquired about when the 50th & France development was done, how were the people and property owners within that tax increment district involved. Mayor Richards stated that in 1970 -72, one of the strongest groups was the 50th & France Business Association which still meets on a regular basis. The Vernon Avenue area has a group that meets on a regular basis with continuous involvement also. Assistant Manager Hughes commented that a steering committee was and still is working as an interface with the City. The committee is typically made up of tenants and landlords and is currently meeting with him on a monthly basis on a prospective project this year. Member Smith questioned the type of input he was hearing from the 50th & France Association, and what impact they have had. Manager Hughes stated they had participated very closely in the initial project and with the present project are guiding our architect more than staff in terms of the urban design elements that are being pursued. Member Kelly asked if members of the 50th & France Business Owners Association is comprised of members of the Minneapolis side too. Manager Hughes said yes the Association does have Minneapolis members and that the Edina side is in a tax increment district while the Minneapolis side is not. The improvements for the Minneapolis side were financed through special assessment as opposed to tax increment financing. Member Kelly asked that perhaps the association does more than work with tax increment issues. Manager Hughes commented yes. Member Rice inquired if property owners would feel like they were in a quandry if these districts were established, and would an orderly timetable be developed. Manager Hughes stated that it varies from district to district. The 44th & France district is similar to 50th & France and recommendation would be to encourage that area to adopt and establish an association that can be worked with - to bounce ideas off of and be a sounding board. Member Rice asked if this timetable was meant to be months or years. Manager Hughes commented months would be needed to get something like that started. 70th & Cahill is a much less cohesive area and one property owner is instrumental with what will happen in that district. Valley View & Wooddale is more in the middle, with two key owners in this district. An association would also be beneficial in this area. Manager Hughes stated that after creating the districts, it would be the decision of the Council how aggressive or reactive they would like to be in promoting the districts. Mayor Richards commented the issue of aggressive or reactive promoting of the area bears discussing. The City has not been proactive in trying to promote types of improvements. The initiative has come from the private sector with building expansion, etc. He referred to the four previous tax increment districts that have been instituted, that the initiative had been taken by the City. This could be done, but would fly in the face of the City, in that if the private sector does not want to do it, then the City shouldn't propose it. The City is not creating projects, and if a deadline is put on it, it might create an artificial stimulation that may or may not be warranted by the area that is under discussion. Member Rice inquired whether it would be the City's policy to encourage these areas to be in constant communication with City staff, that these plans and uses are not in concrete, but are here to help. Mayor Richards concurred that we are here to discuss any proposals that the private sector may come up with. Member Kelly asked in establishing these districts, if the City must have a plan in order to approve a district, how much flexibility can we have with the plan. Attorney Gilligan explained that under the statute there is no need for detailed plans or land uses that are set forth in the development program. Goals and objectives need to be stated about the City's intentions, but no details need to be done. Member Smith asked if it is typical in a plan to go into the detail that has been done for these proposed districts. Attorney Gilligan stated that many of these plans come about because there is a development that will occur, so it is known, as opposed to not knowing what is going to happen. The proposals for the districts allow for much more flexibility and are proposed plans, but do not commit the City to the specific land use. Member Smith said in his understanding of the plan, we do not have "little boxes" of future development. In the plan a line has been drawn around a neighborhood or an area and that identifies the district. The plan does not spell out this or that happening, but is background information staff has used to determine what the size the district should be. Mayor Richards asked the pleasure of the Council. Council Member Rice made a motion for the adoption of the following resolution as it relates to the establishment of a tax increment district for the 44th Street and France Avenue area: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 2 AND TAB INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS FOR TAB INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS 90 -1, 90 -2 AND 90 -3 MAKING FINDINGS AND REQUESTING CERTIFICATION OF THE TAB INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS 90 -1, 90 -2, AND 90 -3. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. On April 2, 1990, this Council held a public hearing on the designation of Development District No. 2 (the "Development District ") and the adoption of the Development Program for Development District No.2 (the "Program ") and on the adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax Increment Financing Districts 90 -1, 90 -2, and 90 -3 (the "Tax Increment Districts "), after notice of public hearing was published in the official newspaper of the City not less than 10 days prior to the date of the hearing. The City has consulted with its planning department on the designation of the Development District. All persons desiring to be heard at the,hearing were given an opportunity to express their views. 2. Copies of the Program and the Tax Increment Financing Plans have been presented to this Council and are ordered placed on file with the City Clerk. The forms of the Program and Tax Increment Financing Plans are hereby approved and are incorporated herein by reference. 3. The Program and Tax Increment Financing Plans and the designation of the Development District and establishment of the Tax Increment Financing Districts are hereby approved. 4. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision 3, it.is hereby found for the reasons set forth in the Program and Tax Increment Financing Plans that: A. Tax Increment Financing Districts 90 -2 and 90 -3 are each in "economic development district" as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 12. B. Tax Increment Financing District 90 -1 is a "redevelopment district" as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 10. C. The proposed development outlined in the Program in the opinion of this Council would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and therefor the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary, D. The Tax Increment Financing Plans conform to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole in that it aids in the development of the property in the Development District in a manner that alleviates deficiencies in the Development District as set forth in the Program. E. The Tax Increment Financing Plans will afford maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole for the development of the area included in the Development District by private enterprise in that it alleviates deficiencies in the Development District as set forth in the Program. F. The City elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, subdivision 3, clause (a). 5. The City Manager is authorized and directed to request that the appropriate officials of Hennepin County to establish the Tax Increment Districts for the premises in the City described in the Tax Increment Financing Plans. Passed by the Council this 2nd day of April, 1990. Mayor Attest: City Clerk The motion was seconded by Council Member Paulus, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Nays: Kelly Motion carried. Council Member Smith made a motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution as it relates to the establishment of a tax increment district for the Yooddale Avenue and Valley View Road area. The motion was seconded by Council Member Rice, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Nays: Kelly Motion carried. Council Member Smith made a motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution as it relates to establishment of a tax increment district for the 70th Street and Cahill Road area. The motion was seconded by Council Member Rice, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 7101 -13 AMUNDSON AVENUE CONTINUED TO 4116/90 Motion vas made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Rice to continue the final development plan for 71101 -13 Amundson Avenue, George Kosmides, generally located at southeast corner of Cahill Rd and Amundson Av until April 16, 1990. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS DENIED - SOUTH HARRIET PARK STEINER ADDITION Planner Craig Larsen gave background of the Harriet Park Steiner Addition. In March 1986 Council approved a final plat at the intersection of 52nd Street and Minnehaha Boulevard. That plat created two new lots by'breaking off the rear portion of two lots that were fronting on Minnehaha Blvd. A condition of that approval was the imposition of private restrictive covenants that would be imposed prior to the release of building permits on the two lots. Those covenants were never signed or recorded, consequently staff has refused to issue building permits for the two lots. Council /Staff received a letter from Mr. Gislason, one of the two parties of the original plat and he requests the Council remove restrictions as a condition of the building permits. The restrictions are structured as a private covenant, seven nearby property owners were given the standing to enforce the provisions of the covenants. The neighbors were notified of the request and the hearing before the Council. Specifically within the Covenants, Section 1, paragraphs A -H set forth design criteria for the houses to be built upon the lots and the intent at the time of those provisions was to insure that the design materials and the scale of the new homes would be similar to those existing in the neighborhood. Mr. Robert Gislason, 5205 Minnehaha Blvd., lawyer and 40 year Edina resident, submitted a letter to Council asking that the Special Building Restrictions be removed. He stated that when he was asked to join in making the subdivision, by his neighbors, the only difficulty with this was the lot length with it only being 119' where the code calls for 120'. Lots in the area are generally 60' wide, with the proposed lots being 76' and 78' wide, 25% sq.ft. greater than what is required. This is choice,land and should be subdivided and put on the tax roles. Dr. Steiner did appear in 1986 before the Council as he wanted to sell his house and move to Montana. When Dr. Steiner approached Mr. Gislason, with a long list of covenants and restrictions, he did not agree with the covenants and would not sign them. Mr. Gislason believes the covenants to be onerous, and for all practical purposes these lots seem unmarketable with these covenants in place. The nine covenants in question are: A. No more than one family dwelling on each lot B. Houses shall face and front on West 52nd St. C. Houses shall have a 40' rear setback and no house shall be within 40' of the rear boundary of the lot D. Houses shall not exceed 1 1/2 story in height and shall be not more than 25' at the highest point E. Roof pitch shall be 6/12 or greater F. Garages shall be attached, with two stalls; garage floor shall be not more than 2' above the center line of W. 52nd. St. and follow Edina Ordinances G. Materials for exterior shall be brick, shakes, lap siding or a combination of such. The width of exposed shakes and lap siding shall not exceed 12" H. North faces of houses shall be less than 100% glass such that the front walls of the houses shall not be all glass Mr. Gislason passed out copies of two Supreme Court Landmark Cases, June 1, 1962, No 38,420, T. Joseph Olsen v. City of Minneapolis and May 1, 1959, No. 37,609, State Ex. Re;. Melville Foster and Another v. City of Minneapolis and Another. The Foster case dealt with a municipal corporation that may not condition restricted uses of property upon the consent of private individuals such as the owners of adjoining property. In that case, 2/3 of the adjacent property owners tried to stop something. The Olson case dealt with the building of a filling- station at 58th & Penn. The Court said it seemed obvious that the City's underlying motive in denying plaintiff the permit, was its conclusion that the operation of the filling station would violate the neighborhood concept which it sought to insure. These are choice lots in a nice neighborhood. Mr. Gislason stated he has not tried to market this land, but has been approached by people who had gotten his name from City.Hall. He stated he feels these lots should be put in the tax roles the same as all the adjoining land, and feels that the restrictions are unfair and unlawful. Member Paulus asked when these covenants were established in 1986, was the legal opinion that they could stand. Attorney Erickson referred to the minutes attached of February 3, 1986, these lots were sub - standard, because they were not deep enough and needed a variance. Within the variance process, the neighbors were advised of a problem. A meeting was held February 3, 1986, with the neighbors, City staff and Mr. Steiner. At that point it came before Council as an agreed upon instance where the parties said fine, these conditions are acceptable, accept and approve the plat with these conditions imposed. At that time no research or opinions were given and no dispute was heard. The initial plat approval was subject to the obtaining of the recorded conditions, and appears by the time of the final plat approval, these had not been signed and plat was approved subject to them not issuing building permits. The same consent was there, it was just deferred, the way the minutes read. There were no opinions given at that time on the validity of the restrictions. Mr. Erickson stated he is familiar with the restrictions cited, restrictive uses may not be conditioned on the consent of adjoining property owners. He referred to the Olson case Mr. Gislason spoke about and agreed that you can not deny a requested activity within the ordinance that is solely based upon the objections of neighbors. This case was not based on neighborhood approval nor based on ascetics, it was a consent arrangement that came before the Council. Member Paulus asked if her understanding is that this arrangement as originally drawn up, could stand in a court of law. Mr. Erickson said there may well be some problems with the restrictions as framed. The legal issue did not come from the Council, there was no dispute at the time. He believes what happened was that the Council imposed these restrictions, based upon a statement that everything was fine. Whether the Council would have acted and approved the plat, had there been a dispute was another point. The plat was approved based upon statement that these conditions would be imposed. Member Paulus questioned whether the plat would become null and void if these conditions were not met. Mr. Erickson stated this would be an argument if these conditions were withdrawn, and the approval was given on the presumption that these conditions were going to be there, therefore the plat should not have been approved and it may be revoked. Member Paulus asked whether the City Ordinance presently states that no future single family homes in Edina can be built with only a single car garage and couldn't be grandfathered in for a one garage. Planner Larsen stated there must be a two -car garage. Member Paulus inquired if a person building- a-home meets all ordinances, would these plans be reviewed by the Planning Department. Planner Larsen stated that the restrictions that are before the Council are a private matter and the City is not party to those. If there was a disagreement, the seven parties would have to enforce the covenants. Member Paulus asked if at the time this was discussed back in 1986, were all parties part of the discussion at that time. Planner Larsen said 2 parties proposed the plat and all dealings were with Dr. Steiner with no staff contact with the Gislason's. The City was led to believe that there was an agreement on the proposal. Member Paulus asked whether Mr. Gislason was aware of or present at discussions going on about this. Mr. Gislason stated he was not present, and had no information that discussions were taking place. His first knowledge of a problem was when he was asked to sign a document concerning these restrictions and he refused to do so. Member Paulus-inquired about when this happened. He said 2 -3 years ago. Member Paulus asked if he had spoken to Mr. Larsen at that time and asked if he had had a problem with the original agreement that was drafted. Mr. Gislason stated he explained his position to Dr. Steiner and left it up to him and said again.that he would not sign it. This has come up now because there is a purchaser that is interested in one of the lots. Mancel Mitchell, 5137 Juanita, spoke for himself and a neighbor Maria Beal, 5136 Indianola; Rita Lehnert, speaking for her mother, Mary, 5209 Minnehaha Boulevard; Carolyn Wenger, 5212 Halifax; spoke in opposition to the lifting of the restrictive covenants. Doug Grabham, 5201 Minnehaha offered an apology for bringing up the matter to begin with. He had a vested interest as he pays the taxes on the empty lots. Comments heard from the aforementioned residents ranged from the belief being that anyone interested in building in the area would keep to the spirit and flavor of the neighborhood and could easily build within these covenants, residents were in the belief that the City was a party to the process of the drawing up of the covenants, if the Council chooses to lift these covenants the suggestion was heard that the whole plat process should be reexamined, Mayor Richards asked for concerns or questions from the Council. Member Paulus commented that if these covenant's are removed, it should go back for variance review. The intent was that the subdivision was granted with the covenant's riding with it. She asked for clarification from the the planning department regarding her interpretation of this so that the proponents are aware that it will go back through the process. Member Jack Rice asked for clarification on-the process. Could anyone buy these lots, come in and build on them without a plat being filed. Attorney Erickson said he has not read the statute lately but believes that a court order would have to be acquired to cancel the plat that has already been filed. Member Peggy Kelly asked what it would take to get a court order and would be very expensive. Attorney Erickson stated it all depends upon how hard Mr. Gislason fights, it could be expensive but depends upon how difficult a task it is on the defense side. There would have to be some arguments on misrepresentation that led the City to do what they did and after these were proven to be such, the opportunity should be revoked. Member Kelly said in her understanding that if these covenant's are lifted, this is the process that would have to be done. Attorney Erickson said no, it is a choice. Member Rice said if these covenants are rescinded, then we are dependent upon someone else doing something to get control back over the process. Mayor Richards recalled the action was an approval of a certain action predicated upon certain events occurring. If one action is removed, the burden is upon the Council. The staff was instructed not to issue a building permit until those covenant's were filed. If the covenant's are removed, the position seems that the staff is free to issue the building permit. If we do not agree with that point of view then the action we have taken stands. If Council agrees the action taken stands. Member Jane Paulus commented that if you want to see how ridiculous the covenants are, speak to the people who live in the Country Club area. Someone can purchase a lot, say these are the plans that they are going to build on the lot, but are not legally tied in to those plans, once the lot is purchased. There is no safeguard because Planner Larsen has seen the plans to say to the neighborhood they have a guarantee that the house will fit in when it goes up. Member Kelly inquired about her understanding that these covenant's were between the people involved and the process. Mayor Richards commented that we had a difference of opinion regarding whether a variance should be granted. Before we got down to the merits of granting or not granting a variance, a consensus was presented to the Council by the then affected property owners, putting these 8 restrictions on the property. There was no objection to the property being platted or replatted. Member Rice asked if on that basis the Council assumed this was the case. Mayor Richards said he does not know how he would have thought on the variance, but knew when everyone was in agreement, and differs some with Mr. Gislason's viewpoint. Mayor Richards does not consider this onerous enough to diminish the market value of the property. Character'and symmetry of the neighborhood is always examined to see if development is consistent with regulations. Mayor Richards said the way he sees this situation is to assure that what is being proposed, is what the end result would be. He stated that is the way he voted in 1986, and plans to vote as such this evening. Member Paulus asked Mayor Richards if he had any problem with legal issues on this issue standing. Mayor Richards said he does not use the word legally, but knows where he stands in voting with what is right or wrong. Member Paulus again said that she has no problem with this, but hears that if it stands, feels that the City will be legally challenged. Mayor Richards stated he would not change his mind because of a possible suit against the City. Member Rice thinks he is hearing that everyone wants to maintain character and symmetry, maintain the neighborhood, etc., if this stands and someone who wishes to build on this property, and must follow the covenants, is the City in a position to allow this to happen or not. Attorney Erickson said no. At the time it was set -up, it was established that surrounding neighbors were the enforcing entities. If they comply with their building code, they are entitled to a building permit, but if they don't comply with these, the neighbors could say they did not comply with them and must. Member Rice stated that it would be up to the neighbors to take the action to stop or go ahead with building. Mayor Richards stated there are ""a number of choices but the three that surface are: 1. Affirm the action taken by a previous Council saying that no building permit should be issued until these restrictions are placed at record. Which in effect carries forward those conditions seen as set forth. 2. Accept the current proponents request to remove and release those restrictions altogether. If that is the decision of the Council, then suggest that'the related issue be addressed whether or not the City should take action to unwind the approval of the replat and the filing of that replat to go back and address the fact of variance being necessary to develop the lots that have been created out of the replat. Or take the action that this does not need to be done, the replat would be filed. In effect the City's staff should issue a building permit upon compliance with all building requirements for detached single family residence rezoning. 3. Do not deal with it, refer it back to the Planning Commission or for continuance if additional information is needed. Member Smith stated that the proponent could go back and negotiate with the property owners that are affected by this agreement that goes with the land by virtue of the platting, and try to get modifications that are deemed necessary and bring that revision back to Council and then go forth and enforce their restriction. If he neighbors wanted to modify this plan they may. Mr. Smith stated he is thinks things should be as they are, and that Mr. Gislason should try to work with the neighbors, if they at that time want to revise it they may. Mr. Smith said he would vote to let it stand. Member Smith made a motion to deny the request to remove the restrictive covenants from the South Harriet Park Steiner Addition and a second to the motion was given by Member Paulus. Member Rice stated he would support the motion, however if Mr. Gislason came back in the future and said he was able to negotiate all but one item on the list, and no one is responsive to that, he might have a different attitude about it. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. Mayor Richards commented that the action taken in March, 1986 stands. * LOT DIVISIONS APPROVED AT 7021 VMORD RD AND 7028 AND 7100 DOWN ROAD AND LOT DIVISIONS AT 6124 AND 6128 EWING AV SO APPROVED Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute various separate parcels: Lot 12, PROSPECT HILLS, and Lot 2, Block 1, GRIFFITH ADDITION, and Lot 1, Block 1, SCHEY'S PARR VIEW 2ND ADDITION WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to subdivide said tracts into the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "Parcels "): Lot 12, PROSPECT HILLS, except that part of Lot 12, PROSPECT HILLS lying southeasterly of a line running from a point in the easterly line of Wexford Road distant 67.26 feet southerly measured along said easterly line, from the southwesterly corner of Lot 13 said PROSPECT HILLS, to a point in the northeasterly line of said Lot 13, distant 50.00 feet northwesterly, measured along said northeasterly line, from the southeasterly corner of said Lot 13 and lying westerly of a line drawn from a point on the above described line distant 97.08 feet northeasterly along said line from the easterly line of Wexford Road to a point on the south line of said Lot 12 distant 139.81 feet easterly along said south line from the most westerly corner of said Lot 12. Subject to easements of record, if any; and Lot 2, Block 1, GRIFFITH ADDITION, and that part of Lot 12, PROSPECT HILLS lying southeasterly of a line running from a point in the easterly line of Wexford Road distant 67.26 feet southerly measured along said easterly line, from the southwesterly corner of Lot 13 said PROSPECT HILLS, to a point in the northeasterly line of said Lot 13, distant 50.00 feet northwesterly, measured along said northeasterly line, from the southeasterly corner of said Lot 13 and lying westerly of a line drawn from a point on the above described line distant 97.08_feet northeasterly along said line from the easterly line of Wexford Road to a point on the south line of said Lot 12 distant 139.81 feet easterly along said south line from the most westerly corner of said Lot 12. Except the east 54.03 feet as measured at right angles to the east line thereof. Subject to easements of record, if any; and Lot 1, Block 1, SCHEY'S PARR VIEW 2ND ADDITION, and the east 54.03 feet, as measured at right angles to the east line, of the following described property: That part of Lot 12, PROSPECT HILLS lying southeasterly of a line running from a point in the easterly line of Wexford Road distant 67.26 feet southerly, measured along said easterly line, from the southwesterly corner of Lot 13 said PROSPECT HILLS, to a point in the northeasterly line of said Lot 13, distant 50.00 feet northwesterly, measured along said northeasterly line, from the southeasterly corner of said Lot 13 and lying westerly of a line drawn from a point on the above described line distant 97.08 feet northeasterly along said line from the easterly line of Wexford Road to a point on the south line of said Lot 12 distant 139.81 feet easterly along said south line from the most westerly corner of said Lot 12. Subject to easements of record, if any. WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinances Nos. 804 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 804 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof- as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. ADOPTED this 2nd day of April, 1990. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute various separate parcels: Lot 3, Block 1, ENGL.EHARDT'S ADDITION, and Lot 1, Block 1, FARMER'S SECOND ADDITION WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to subdivide said tracts into the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "Parcels "): Lot 3, Block 1, ENGLEHARDT'S ADDITION, except the south 5 feet, and Lot 1, Block 1, FARMER'S SECOND ADDITION, and the south 5 feet of Lot 3, Block 1, ENGLEHARDT'S ADDITION; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the.City of Edina Ordinances Nos. 804 and '825 ; NOV,_THER_EFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 804 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. ADOPTED this 2nd day of April, 1990. DECISION OF BOARD OF APPEALS OVERTURNED: SIDEYARD SETBACK VARIANCE GRANTED - 4420 VANDERVORK AV Associate Planner Phil Dommer gave background on the appeal of the decision by the Edina Board of Appeals to deny a 1.5 foot sideyard setback variance in case B -90 -9. The Board met March 15, 1990, to review the subject variance. At issue is a sideyard setback which is a typical situation which we have in the City, where as the building gets taller, the sideyard setback requirement is increased by 1 1/2' on both sides of the house. The Board of Appeals heard this request, reviewed testimony from the proponent and decided to deny the request. The proponent is here tonight with her designer if there are any questions: Mayor Richards called for questions from the audience. Mayor Richards asked the proponent to speak. Star Marie Anderson- Atwater, a 10 year resident at 4420 Vandervork Av., stated that in March, Mr. Dommer told her that a home in her neighborhood had a variance when it was built and her home will resemble this home when her addition is completed. Ms. Anderson - Atwater added there are 7 houses on her block, 4 two -story and 3 one - story. She said her neighbors have no objection to the plans, after examining them. One neighbor adjoining has one window on the side facing the Anderson - Atwater home and the neighbor on the other side has only one win being a bathroom window. She said she has two children and needs room and it would be more expensive to put the addition in 1 1/2' ft. Mayor Richards opened up the meeting for comments on why this variance should not be granted. Member Kelly asked if any neighbors were in the audience that would speak to this issue. She noted she has driven around the area a lot today and commented that this is a unique area in that the back yard is a wetland, across the street is a park and it is east west facing so no blocking light out with 2 story houses next to the one story houses. She said she wished she could hear the neighbors state they have no objection to this addition, but after her examining of the area she stated she could allow this variance to be granted. Member Paulus asked of Mr. Dommer whether we got any comments at the time the original variance was heard. Associate Planner Dommer commented that there were no comments heard, either at the hearing or by letter. Member Smith asked Mr. Dommer if these neighbors have ever signed off. Mr. Dommer said no, that it is not required that neighbors sign, their opportunity to make their feelings heard is at the hearing, and they received a notice about that. Member Smith inquired if there is a way of indicating agreement with the proponents statement that the neighbors do not object. Mr. Dommer stated he did not know this for sure. Ms. Anderson - Atwater commented that one neighbor's son who does painting and wallpapering and wants to do the work. Member Smith wanted more evidence that the neighbors were all right with this addition. Mayor Richards stated that all the City can do is send notices and give people the opportunity to participate. Member Smith stated the Council does not know what the residents think and expressed concern. Mayor Richards called for the pleasure of the Council. Member Kelly made the motion to allow the variance to be granted and the decision of the Board of Appeals for the sideyard setback at 4420 Vandervork Av be overturned and a second to the motion was made by Member Smith. Member Paulus wished the minutes to read that no neighbors were present at the variance meeting and at the public hearing April 2, 1990, nor was there any public comment noted. Member Kelly said if that was to be included that it should be noted that at the Board.of Appeals meeting the vote was a 2 to 2 vote which failed because -the lack of majority. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *HEARING DATE OF 4116190 SET FOR PLANNING MATTERS Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to.set April 16, 1990, as hearing date for the following Planning matters: 1) Final Rezoning - R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -2, Ron Clark Construction 2) Final Plat Approval - Highcroft Addition, Ron Clark Construction 3) Preliminary Rezoning Approval - PCD -4 Planned Commercial District to PCD -2 Planned Commercial District - Valgreen's by Semper Holdings 4916 France Avenue South 4) Preliminary Plat Approval of R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District to PRD -2, Planned Residential District - Schaefer Development 5) Final Development Plan - Opus Corporation - Western Rational Mutual Insurance - 5350 V. 78th St., 5309 Industrial Boulevard - Building Expansion 6) Final Development Plan for 6969 France Av. S. - Gabbert and Beck Building Expansion Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE RELATING TO OP -SALE VINE LICENSE AMENDMENT GRANTED City Manager Rosland gave background information about the wine Ordinance 902 -A1. Council adopted the wine licensing ordinance on April 1, 1985, which allowed sales of wine only in qualifying restaurants. Sec. 43 of the ordinance provided for automatic termination of all previously issued licenses and also stated that no licenses shall be issued after July 1, 1990. There are 3 options: 1. Extend the sunset provision to a future date. 2. Repeal the sunset provision as stated in Sec. 43. 3. Take no action and hold a public hearing Staff has no objections to wine licensing, it has gone well as a general rule, with getting paperwork done the only problem and not with wine as a public nuisance problem. Member Kelly made the motion to eliminate the sunset provision on Ordinance No. 902 -A1. A second to the motion was made by Member Smith. Member Smith asked of Attorney Erickson what the effect would be with the elimination of the sunset provision. Attorney Erickson stated that at any time the ordinance could be amended, delete or cancel or do whatever is wished. Member Smith asked if this would condemn anyone's right to sell wine. Attorney Erickson stated that liquor licenses were not considered a property right so are not subject to claims for taking them away. Mayor Richards opened up the meeting for questions. Member Smith asked if this was the appropriate time to strengthen things or fine people if they don't acquire training. Mayor Richards this is perhaps an appropriate comment, but a more appropriate time to do this would be when the general ordinance is being dealt with. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. CONCERN OF RESIDENT REGARDING WALNUT RIDGE PARK CONTINUED TO 4116/90 Manager Rosland suggested that the Walnut Ridge Park discussion be continued to April 16,. 1990, because the concerned resident is away on vacation. DISCUSSION HELD ON PRIVATE PARKING LOTS AT FAIRVIEW SOUT ®ALE HOSPITAL AND SOUTHDALE MEDICAL CLINIC At the March 5, 1990, meeting, staff had presented information on existing Edina ordinances that would apply to regulation of private parking lots. Following that discussion, it was a consensus of the Council that staff bring back further information for discussion regarding additional action the City could consider. Planner Larsen has provided the following information in his memo of April 2, 1990. The City of Minneapolis requires a license for all parking lots containing 10 or more parking spaces. All parking lots are subject to design standards and are reviewed by the Department of Public Works. Commercial parking lots, those charging for parking, are subject.to further requirements, including signage and stacking spaces. All parking lot licenses are granted by the Minneapolis City Council. Key elements of the ordinance relating to Commercial Lots are: EDINA ORDINANCE MINNEAPOLIS ORDINANCE Edina requires no license 1. Licenses required for all parking lots containing 10 or more spaces - Free Parking: License for initial application only - .Commercial lots: Yearly license required, Fee between $100 -$300 2. Performance Requirements: All Parking Lots: A. Yes A. Hard surface required B. Yes B. Setbacks required C. Yes C. Landscaping & screening required D. Yes D. Design and layout subject to approval,of City Engineer No Ordinance Requirement 3. Stacking spaces at entrance (Note: Stacking spaces were required 1 space for self -serve ticket vendor for review by City Engineer and 3 or 4 for attended lots No Requirements 4. Sign Requirements A. Name & phone # of licensee B. Hours of operation C. Rates, including minimum rate and maximum rate for 12 and 24 hours. D. Size of signs defined in Ordinance No Ongoing or Periodic 5. Inspections. Authorized as deemed inspections required. necessary by Department of Licenses. Manager Rosland stated that staff had met with the Cambridge Group to make it safe parking. The stance took by the staff is that Cambridge in theory has the right to do what they want with their property. The responsibility of the City is to protect public safety. Staff has met with them on a number of occasions, the City engineers have reviewed it, Hennepin County because of 66th Street has reviewed it also. The engineering and fire staff has been monitoring the lot, with regard to stacking on the public streets and emergency vehicles. Manager Rosland noted he had personally visited the lot which was approximately 50 -60% full. He exited on 66th Street but noted about 35 cars parked in the Southdale area, obviously were parked there for Southdale Medical which is a safety concern. Mayor Richards opened up the discussion to the public. The following spoke in opposition to paid parking that the owners of the Southdale Medical Building have implemented: Sarah Foss, resident of Richfield; Gordon Hendrickson, 5708 Upton Av. S.; Paul Belvedeere, DDS tenant of Southdale Medical Building; Doneta Hoffman, 5825 St. John's Av., Leanne Tillman, 8370 Red Rock Road, Eden Prairie; Roberta Thorp, resident of Edina; Dr. William Wright, 6621 Sally Dr., retired pediatrician; Doug Lambert, DDS, 6205 Hansen Road; Paul Mullin, owner of Foto -Lab in Southdale Medical Building; Gary Bolmgren, resident of Richfield; and Glenn Hendrickson. Objections and concerns voiced included: paying for parking at both the hospital and medical building, access for emergency vehicles, concern for non - ambulatory patients, building safety, lack of communication between building owners and tenants, permanent completion of the lot, no means of dropping- off /picking -up of people, fear of patient and /or doctor egress. Safety for patients choosing to park in the Southdale Center lot and crossing 66th Street to the Medical Building was expressed by several persons as well as safety of pedestrians entering the building from the lot. Mayor Richards asked what has been done about access to the building for emergency vehicles in the public right -of -way. Manager Rosland explained that the area had been examined by the Police and Fire Departments, i.e., curbs, etc. as to adequate access. Two areas previously mentioned as temporary drive -overs are exactly that, and will be changed when weather allows construction. One lady has been hit on the Southdale Center perimeter road coming from the medical building. As the parking lot is now, no one can be dropped off at the front door, however if you drive in and stay less than 15 minutes there is no charge. Planner Larsen then summarized the differences between Edina's ordinance requirements and the Minneapolis Ordinance. Licensing requirements do not preclude someone from choosing to charge for parking, no communities were found that prohibit charging. Mayor Richards asked the City Attorney, if there would be legal impositions for Edina if the City were to adopt an ordinance to preclude someone from charging for parking on private property. Attorney Erickson stated that City Ordinances must be related to the health, safety and welfare of the community. This charge or no- charge would have to be tied to the existence of a health or safety factor. If charging begins and it becomes more of a safety risk, there may be some reason to impose an ordinance restriction. Some nexus would have to be found between the ordinance and the activity being governed. Member Paulus asked, if the City were to establish an ordinance regulating parking lots after the fact, could we require those standards then to be met. Attorney Erickson commented that Edina has fought that issue with building codes, where a new building code is adopted, and existing buildings must comply. This has been won on a health- safety issue, i.e., sprinkler in a basement so firefighters don't get caught in smoky areas. This could possibly be done if it is a health- safety feature, otherwise it could be a non - conforming use grandfathered in. Member Smith whether crossing of 66th Street by pedestrians could be characterized as a life- saving issue. Attorney Erickson stated no, rather the actual use of the lot, by virtue of charging, may make it a safety factor. Member Smith asked whether the City can regulate a drop -off access. Attorney Erickson said yes, if it were in the public street where it might back up traffic and result in people getting hurt. This may well have the connection between regulation and the . health- safety feature it entails. Member Smith asked if it is necessary in every building to have a public -free access to an automobile without charge. Attorney Erickson said, no, not without charge but all Edina's code requires all buildings to have access to public streets. Member Paulus asked if that could be an ordinance requirement. Attorney Erickson said again only if it has a health- safety factor to it. Just because the lot does not have free access it does not necessarily indicate a safety feature. It could be stated that people could not be dropped off in the public streets, or areas that otherwise would be posted for no- parking or no- stopping. If there was parking on the street, it would be difficult to stop and unload someone. If it were a non -stop, non -park area, it could be said you cannot unload people in those types of zones, and it could be posted as such. Member Paulus commented that this is private property and that the issue as to charging is their decision. She again stated her concern over the stacking of cars in the lot, the crossovers and the traffic flow. This is one of biggest health- safety hazards that needs correcting. Signage should state that people using the lot for parking must have cash upon exiting. Member Smith stated he recently doctored at another facility with a family member that had paid parking and did not like it. However it was a part of the facility, and was out of his control. There is no regulation that states you cannot charge for parking. He felt there could be better access for emergency vehicles. Also that the building owners should have been given the tenants more notice on the paid parking. If the concern is safety, this is an item that can be addressed by the Council, but an ordinance cannot be designed saying someone cannot charge for parking. Member Kelly asked whether this would be brought back as a draft ordinance, or whether this would be open for discussion again. She stressed the importance of the safety issue, the need for a charge for licensing, and said a lot of employee time had been spent on this issue and the City should be reimbursed. Member Rice suggested that an ordinance be pursued. Cambridge came into Edina, acted fast and the City had no ordinance permitting or not allowing paid parking or licensing to happen. He stated if we were starting with a vacant lot, there would certainly have been more than 24 hours to consider its approval. He mentioned other paid parking facilities in the area; however they all have a pick -up /drop -off access. Member Rice said he felt the situation will improve. The marketplace will tell Cambridge if their decision was good or bad. The tenants are upset and have communicated that to the owner. If many leave the building, the owners will rethink their position on paid parking. Safety is the major concern, but staff feels it is a safe access even though it looks awkward. There is a feeling that not everything needs to.be regulated but if there are going to be commercial parking lots in the City, there must be some control over them, Le, a process and reimbursement for the process. Mayor Richards in summation said that safety seems to be the biggest concern, and along with that, regulations about how we would license and inspect, and how we would see parking lots function. Whether to charge or not to charge should not be the issue focused on. Access questions have been raised, emergency and health- safety issues also have been discussed. Mayor Richards asked that staff draft an ordinance that would address the issues raised to be brought to Council on May 7, 1990, to which the Council concurred. He also suggested that Cambridge be notified of the meeting. Member Smith suggested that Cambridge be notified of the concern for clear access to the front door for drop- off /pick -up. Dr. Belvedeere asked if he could submit a video tape that he has made of the parking lot entrances which might help to make a decision. Mayor Richards said that any information which might help in the decision - making process, should be submitted to the City staff. BID AWARDED FOR TOW TRUCK WITH RECOVERY UNIT Public Works Director Francis Hoffman explained this request was continued from March 5, 1990, meeting. He noted the attachments in the packet and that the funds come from Central Services which means other departments benefit from this purchase also. Questions.brought up about this truck were how often it was used, for just towing and not servicing or what. He explained that towing costs the City approximately $3,000 - $4,000 annually. This includes Public Works, and the Police and Fire Departments. During a really cold winter this could be up to $2,000 more per year. Director Hoffman commented that this appears to be an expensive vehicle, but over 15 years it appears this would pay for itself. Member Kelly said this is a budgeted item. Member Kelly made ,a motion to award the bid to purchase the Challenger Model 5601 tow truck from Twin City's Wrecker Sales in the amount of $69,940.00. A second to the motion was given by Member Rice. Member Paulus stated this is an awesome amount of money to pay for one tow truck, is.still grateful that she questioned the cost. Director Hoffman commented that this is not even the cream of the crop vehicle and is very standard. The Public Works Department did not request specifications for a super rig. Member Smith asked if there was a possibility of sharing this with another suburb. Director Hoffman said the service could be offered and they could use it. The Police and Fire have mutual aid, and the possibility could be looked into it. He told that Bloomington has two huge super trucks, completely out of Edina's league. Member Rice stated that 3 or 4 staff people said that we need this'truck, and he concurs with them. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards Nays: Smith Motion carried. *BID AWARDED FOR SAND. ROCK, BITUMINOUS MATERIAL. CONCRETE Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bids to recommended low bidders as follows: Sand (delivered) to Prior Lake Aggregate at $3.03 per ton; Buckshot (delivered) to Model Stone at $8.35 per ton; Limestone Class II (delivered) to Edward Kraemer & Sons for $5.30 per ton; Seal Coat Chips (delivered) to Dresser Trap Rock for $13.25 per ton; Plant Asphalt #2331 (picked up) to Commercial Asphalt for $16.20 per ton; Asphalt 2331 Fine (picked -up) to Midwest Asphalt at $19.10 per ton; Asphalt #2341 (picked -up) to Midwest Asphalt at $19.20 per ton; Asphalt Winter Mix (picked -up) to Midwest Asphalt for $39.00 per ton;. Concrete (delivered) to Model Stone for $44.00 cu.yd.; Cut Back Asphalt (delivered) to Koch Refining at .708 per gallon. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR ONE REVERSIBLE SNOW PLOW AND WING Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for one reversible snow plow and wing to recommended low bidder, LeRaas Manufacturing_& Sales, at $10,558.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR ONE 1990 FORD F -800 LIFT TRUCK WITH AN AERIAL BUCKET Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for one 1990 Ford F -800 lift truck with an aerial bucket to recommended low bidder, Road Machinery 6 Supply for $67,108.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR PARKING LOT RECONSTRUCTION AT BRAElLAR GOLF COURSE Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for parking lot reconstruction at the Braemar Golf Course to recommended low bidder Alber Construction for $168,951.20. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR BRAEMAR SOCCER FIELD RENOVATION Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for the renovation of the Braemar Soccer Field to recommended low bidder, Perkins Landscape for $9,789.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. I -494 EIS UPDATE GIVEN Engineer Francis Hoffman gave an update of what has been done so far. Information and evaluating is being done on alternatives for I -494. The first area of review is immediately south of Edina between TH 100 and old County Road 18. City staff is working the Mn /DOT, Hennepin County, consultant and other cities staff to develop and reduce the number of alternatives in each area that should be studied in detail. Mayor Richards extended thanks to Director Hoffman and Member Paulus for monitoring this process. The Mayor asked Director Hoffman to report back to Council again with periodic updates. No action required. VACANCY NOTED ON RECYCLING COMMISSION Mayor Richards noted that a vacancy exists on the Recycling Commission as Ken Joyce is unable to accept appointment that was done March 5, 1990, to fill the partial term to 2/1/91. The Mayor explained he has one name submitted to him, and if the Council has names of interested people to submit those to him. His intention is to appoint someone to fill this vacancy by the April 16, 1990, meeting. In addition, it was noted by the Mayor that there is also a vacancy on the Board of Appeals. REPORT GIVEN ON DOG LICENSING PROCESS - CONTINUED TO APRIL 16, 1990 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Mayor Richards commented the information requested at a previous Council meeting had been received from Chief Craig Swanson regarding the Edina process on dog licensing. The Mayor opened up discussion on the process. By consensus of the Members, this item will be on the April 16, 1990, agenda. PROPOSED 1990 PROJECTED STORM WATER IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZATION TO BID CONTINUED TO APRIL 16, 1990, REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Director Hoffman gave background on proposed stormwater projects to be constructed during 1990 to be funded from the stormwater utility as follows: Section I: W. 76th St. & Parklawn, Edina Lake Park $ 9,040.00 Section II: Edina Manor - Grimes & Halifax Avenues South of W. 58th St. 56,492.00 Section IIA: Edina Manor - Grimes & Halifax Avenues from MH CB #4 to MH #5 17,902.00 Section III: Sunnyside Av. & Browndale Av. to Creek 97,885.50 Section IV: W. 64th St between Xerxes and Pond 37,795.00 Section V. Yorktown Park Strip from Adams Hill Pond 105.016.00 TOTAL $324,130.50 Director Hoffman said some neighbors in the Halifax /Grimes area are under the belief that those projects will cause problems for them. Mayor Richards said those projects would be open for discussion on April 16, 1990, when bids are awarded. Member Kelly asked whether the Grimes /Halifax area was the area with flooding problems during the 1987 storm. Director Hoffman said no, the area that had the bad flooding was just north of 58th & Woodcrest. Member Bice moved to authorise bids for the projects as presented with the exception of Sections II and IIA and moved adoption of the following Resolution: RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR STORM SEWER 'ROVEMENTS NOS. STS -199, STS -200, STS 201, STS -202 & STS -203 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA: 1. The plans and specifications for the proposed improvements set forth in the following Advertisement for Bids form, heretofore prepared by the City Engineer, and now on file in the office of the City Clerk are hereby approved. 2. The Clerk shall cause to be published in the Edina Sun and Construction Bulletin the following notice of bids for improvements: (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50th Street EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS STORM SEVER CONTRACT 90 -6 (EKG) IMPROVEMENT NOS. STS -199. STS -200, STS -201 STS -202 & STS -203 BIDS CLOSE APRIL 12, 1990 Bids will be received and opened in the Council Chambers in Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street at 11:00 A.M., Thursday, April 12, 1990. The Edina City Council will meet at 7:00 P.M.,. Monday, April 16, 1990, to consider said.bids. The following are approximate major quantities: 1 EA Storm Water Lift Station 1,855 LF 12 " -27" RCP 11 EA Catch Basins 1,646 LF 16" D.I.P. Force Main 238 LF 6" D.I.P. Force Main 1,490 SY Sod 458 TONS Mn/DOT 2341 Bituminous 1,326 TONS Cl. 5A Gravel Bids shall be.in a sealed envelope with a'statement thereon showing the work covered by the bid. Bids should be addressed to the City Engineer, City of Edina, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota, 55424, and may be mailed or submitted personally to the City Engineer. Bids received by the City Engineer, either through the mail or by personal submission, after the time set for receiving them maybe returned unopened. Work must be done as described in plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Clerk. Plans and specifications are available for a deposit of $25.00 (by check) at the Edina City Hall Engineering Department. Said deposit to be returned upon return of plans and specifications with a bona fide bid. No bids rill be considered unless sealed and accompanied by bid bond or certified check payable to the City of Edina in the amount of at lest ten (10) percent of all bids. All plans mailed, enclose separate check for $5.00 payable to the City of Edina for postage and handling. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk A second to the motion vas made by Member Smith. Mayor Richards asked if there are storm sewer projects requested that are not being proposed at this time. Director Hoffman said staff is now working on the largest project which is the Rolling Green area. Mayor Richards -said the Council should be made aware of any proposed projects so they could respond to questions from residents. OPENINGS ON THE MWCC GENERAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE NOMINATION NOTED Mayor Richards brought to the attention of the Council the need for nominations to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission General Advisory Committee of elected officials and stated that applications would be welcome until mid - April. ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES NOMINATIONS TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS WANTED FOR MAY 16, 1990 ANNUAL MEETING Mayor Richards asked if Council Members had any interest in being nominated for the Board of Directors for the AMM, and to contact these organizations directly. LETTER RECEIVED FROM RESIDENT MARY ANN MACLENNAN DISCUSSED Member Paulus shared that she had received a letter from Mary Ann MacLennan stating her concerns regarding variances and what is happening in the Country Club District as far as lot sizes, historical places and zoning. Manager Rosland said he would ask the Planning Department to phone her and discuss her concerns. PHONE CONVERSATION HELD BETWEEN SARAH JONES OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT AND MAYOR RICHARDS REGARDING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING IN CONNECTION WITH THE REFERENDUM Mayor Richards gave background that there was correspondence in the summer of 1989, speaking about the School Board adopting a resolution requesting the Edina City Council to rebate the excess tax increment revenue resulting from the 1988 referendum for the fiscal year 1989 -90 and annually thereafter. Subsequently, Mayor Richards told Sarah Jones to submit additional information. Mayor Richards has received a letter from James Hamann, the Director of Business Services for the School District, asking the request be added to the agenda of April 16, 1990. LETTERS RECEIVED FROM ELECTED OFFICIALS RELATIVE TO PENDING LEGISLATION Mayor Richards stated he had heard from all three of the legislators, Senator Storm, and Representatives Pauly and Forsythe, noting their position on the tax increment financing bills and the pay equity issues on comparable worth. Mayor Richards added he would supply copies to all Council Members plus staff, and it should be noted that they have responded and acknowledged our positions. DECISION MADE BY COUNTY ON COMPOSTING TO BE DISCUSSED APRIL 16, 1990 Manager Rosland noted that Hennepin County had made a decision on composting. This will discussed further on April 16, 1990, when the Council meets jointly with the Recycling Commission 6:00 P.M. STATE LEGISLATURE (SENATE) ATTEMPTS TO PASS BILL THAT EDINA WOULD LOSE $210.000 IN GAS TAX MONEY Manager Rosland stated the Senate is attempting to pass a bill that would mean Edina would lose $210,000 in gas tax money. He stated that Edina is considered a big City with only a few other Cities named, but Edina has been the focus, and feel Edina is not participator. Manager Rosland said he had spoken to the AMM and the MLC. They are working hard to remove this from the bill. Mayor Richards suggested that letters be written to the various bodies we support financially that lobby on behalf of equity and fairness and make sure they clearly understand our position. They must be made aware of the situation and be asked to lobby against the adoption of that legislation. Manager Rosland commented that two out of the three organizations contacted him this morning and said they would defend the City. did not vote to join these organizations, if that is the type of representation we receive. The legislative delegation should be advised about this. JOINT MEETING TO BE HELD APRIL 16, 1990 WITH RECYCLING COMMISSION A joint meeting of the Recycling Commission and the Council will be held at 6:00 P.M. preceding the regular Council meeting April 16, 1990. CLOSED MEETING CALLED TO DISCUSS LABOR NEGOTIATIONS AFTER ADJOURNMENT Manager Rosland said there would be a closed meeting that by law must be approved by the Council, after the adjournment of this meeting to discuss labor negotiations that are going on right now with three unions. Notion made by Member Smith to hold closed meeting following the adjournment of the regular Council Meeting to discuss labor negotiations. A second to the motion was by Member Kelly. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *CLAIMS PAID Notion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated 4/2/90 and consisting of 25 pages: General Fund $191,458.21, Communications $6,122.13, Art Center $7,180.76, Capital Fund $1,149.00, Golf Course Fund $32,206.97, Recreation Center Fund $8,385.54, Edinborough Park $8,609.16, Utility Fund $249,023.35, Liquor Dispensary Fund $7,076.66, Construction Fund $1,197.75, TOTAL $512,409.53. and for confirmation of payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated 2/28/90 and consisting of 18 pages General Fund $364,012.68, Art Center $1,354.50, Swimming Pool Fund $289.99, Golf Course Fund $14,792.15, Recreation Center Fund $15,269.03, Gun Range Fund $604.44, Edinborough Park $14,454.20, Utility Fund $20,007.41, Storm Sewer Utility $476.61, Liquor Dispensary Fund $219,974.74, TOTAL $651,235.75. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the meeting adjourned at 11:15 P.M. Acting City Clerk AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MAY 7, 1990 7:00 P.M. (Convene Joint HRA /Council Meeting) ROLLCALL I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF SPECIAL JOINT HRA /COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 26, 1990 II. EDINA SCHOOLS - REBATE OF EXCESS TAX INCREMENT (Council) (Contd from 4/16/90) III. AWARD OF BIDS (HRA) A. Improvement No. PL -2 Centennial Lakes North Pond Wall & Liner B. Centennial Lakes Park Improvement•- West Side C. Centennial Lakes Park Building 1. General Construction 2. Electrical Work IV. ADJOURNMENT OF HRA EDINA CITY COUNCIL PROCLAMATION - Edina Bicycle Safety Month I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS All agenda items marked with an asterisk M and in bold print are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered i.n its normal sequence on the agenda. * II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of April 2, 1990 III. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass if improvement has been petitioned for; 4/5 favorable rollcall vote required if no petition. A. Sidewalk Improvement No. S -47 - West 42nd Street from'France Avenue to the west City Limits B. Bituminous Street Surfacing, Concrete Curb and Gutter, Storm Sewer and- Street Lighting Improvement No. BA -291 - West 69th Street from France Avenue to Xerxes Avenue IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/4 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. * A. Preliminary Rezoning Approval - PCD -4 Planned Commercial District to PCD -2 Planned Commercial District - Walgreens by Semper Holdings, Inc. - Located at 4916 France Avenue So (Contd from 4/16/90) (Continue to 5/21/90) B. Licensing Ordinance for Commercial Parking Lots C. Lot Division - Lots 11 -13, Block 14, Country Club District Fairway D. Report on Massing Issue E. Set Hearing Date (5/21/90) 1. Preliminary Plat Approval - Subdivision of Lot 5, Block 1, Muir Woods 2. " Final Plat Approval - Highcroft Townhomes, Ron Clark Construction - Cahill Road and Test 70th Street Edina City Council Agenda May 7, 1990 Page 2 V. ORDINANCES First Reading Requires offering'of Ordinance only. Second Readin Favorable rollcall vote of majority of all members of Council required to pas Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. A.' First Reading - Ordinance No. 613 - To Update Fire Code to meet Requirements of new State Fire Code * B. First Reading - Ordinance No. 803 -A4 - To Delete Limitation of Service by Commission Members, To Correct Ordinance References, and To Allow Council to Replace Members Not Residing in City C. First Reading - Ordinance No. 162 -A2 - To Provide That Failure to Attend Meetings of Board and Commissions May Result in Removal From Office VI. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS A. Leo Hopf, 6625 Naomi Drive - Trapping of Beavers in Nine Mile Creek B. Roger Dreher, 1 Spur Road - Animal Control Ordinance VII. AWARD OF BIDS A. Retaining Wall - Braemar Golf Course Lesson Area (Contd from 4/16/90) * B. Electric Golf Cars * C. Ice Resurfacing Machine * D. Goose Control Contract * E. Mill Pond Weed Harvesting (Contd from 4/16/90) F. Re -work Peat - Fairway #2 - Braemar Golf Course VIII. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Tax Increment Districts Update (Contd from 4/16/90) B. Dog License Renewal Process (Contd from 4/16/90) C. Report on Request for Vacation of Duggan Plaza (David Reyes) D. Report on Appeals Court Decision - Animal Control Ordinance E. Feasibility Report - Storm Sewer Improvements * F. On -Sale Wine License and On -Sale Beer License - Scott Kee's Tour de France, 4924 France Av So IX. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES A. Southwest Suburban Cable Commission * 1. Resolution Approving Name Change From Rogers Cablesystems To RBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. - D /B /A/ Paragon Cable 2. Amendment to Ordinance No. 1120 - To Change Name of Grantee B. Resolution In Support of Minneapolis Application to Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources To Conduct Study of Upper Mississippi River C. 1990 AMM Annual Meeting - May 16 D. LMC 1990 Annual Conference - June 12 -15 X. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL XI. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS XII. FINANCE * A. Payment of Claims per Check Register dated 05/07/90: Total $820,277.49 and Confirmation of payment of Claims per Check Register dated 03/31/90: Total $529,871.70. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Tues May -15 .School District Election Wed May 16 AMM Annual Meeting 5:30 p.m. McGuire's Inn Second Century Forum 7:00 p.m. Community Center Mon May 21 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Mon May 28 MEMORIAL DAY OBSERVED (City Hall Closed) Mon June 4 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room June 12 -15 LMC Convention Duluth, MN Mon June 18 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room J MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY /CITY COUNCIL HELD AT EDINA CITY HALL MARCH 26, 1990 A special joint meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the City Council was convened for a public hearing on the 1990 Amendment to the 50th and France Redevelopment Plan on March 26, 1990 at 7:00 p.m. Action was taken by the HRA and Council as recorded. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners /Members Paulus, Rice, Smith and Richards. PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED: RESOLUTIONS APPROVING 1990 AMENDMENT TO 50TH & FRANCE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN ADOPTED Pursuant to due notice given, a public hearing was conducted on the proposed amendment to the 50th & France Redevelopment Plan. Public attending included Gail Korst, Korst Sons Jewelers, 3901 W. 50th Street; Art Dickey, Arthur Dickey Architects, Inc., 4930 France Avenue; and Allen Siegman, Waterstreet Clothing Company, 3940 W. 50th Street. HRA Executive Director Gordon Hughes informed the HRA and Council that the effect of the proposed amendment to the 50th & France Redevelopment Plan would be two -fold: 1. The amendment would allow the use of tax increments to finance the public improvement project at 50th & France which is estimated to cost $3,000,000. 2. The amendment would allow pooling of tax increments from the 50th & France Redevelopment District and the Southeast Edina Redevelopment District. The amendment would permit, but not obligate, the City to use pooled increments from one district to the other. Director Hughes said that notice of the March 26, 1990 public hearing was given to the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners and the Board of Education for the Edina School District on February 23, 1990. Both agencies were provided with copies of the proposed amendment. Chairman /Mayor Richards called for public comment following a five minute delay so that individuals arriving late would have the opportunity to speak to the proposed amendment. No public comment was heard. Commissioner Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING 1990 AMENDMENT TO 50TH & FRANCE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND REQUESTING THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY COUNCIL BE IT RESOLVED, by The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), as follows: 1. Proposed Amendment. The HRA has approved a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.002, subdivision 16, designated as the 50th & France Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan "), and a redevelopment project to be undertaken pursuant thereto, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.002, subdivision 14 (the "Redevelopment Project "), and that in order to finance the public redevelopment costs to be incurred by the HRA in connection with the Redevelopment Plan and the Redevelopment Project, the Redevelopment Plan established a tag increment financing district, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 9 (the "District ") which is designated by Hennepin County as Tag Increment Financing District No. 1200. It has been proposed that the HRA approve an amendment to the Redevelopment Plan which is• entitled "1990 Amendment to the 50th & France Redevelopment Plan" (the "1990 Amendment ") to authorize the expenditure of tag increment-to finance additional public improvements in the area'subject to the Redevelopment Plan, to expand the area t subject to the Redevelopment Plan to include the area subject to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan of the HRA (the "Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan ") and to authorize the expenditure of tax increment revenue derived from the District to pay for public redevelopment costs incurred and to be incurred by the HRA and the City of Edina in connection with the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan and redevelopment projects undertaken pursuant thereto and to pay debt service on bonds issued and to be issued to finance such public redevelopment costs. 2. Approval of 1990 Amendment. The 1990 Amendment has been presented to this Board and is ordered placed on file in the office of the Executive Director of the HRA. The 1990 Amendment is hereby approved. As stated in the 1990 Amendment, the 1990 Amendment further serves the original goals and purposes of the City and HRA in approving the Redevelopment Plan and the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan which is of benefit to all residents of the City. 3. Pledge Agreement. The officers of the HRA are authorized to enter into an agreement or agreements with the City to evidence the pledge of tax increments from the - District to pay debt service on bonds or other obligations issued and to be issued by the City to finance public redevelopment costs of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan. 4. Presentation to City Council. The 1990 Amendment hereby approved shall be presented to the City Council for a public hearing thereon pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.029, subdivision 6 and Section 469.175, subdivision 4. Dated the 26th day of March, 1990. ATTEST: Chairman Executive Director Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Commissioner Rice. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. Member Rice introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING 1990 AMENDMENT TO 50TH & FRANCE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND MAKING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT THERETO AND PLEDGING TAX INCREMENT TO CERTAIN OUTSTANDING BONDS OF THE CITY BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. The Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), and the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City "), have previously approved the Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan ") and a Redevelopment Project (the "Redevelopment Project ") to be undertaken pursuant thereto and in order to finance the public redevelopment costs to be incurred by the City and the HRA in connection with the Redevelopment Plan and the Redevelopment Project, the Redevelopment Plan established a tax increment financing district (the "District ") which is designated by Hennepin County as Tax Increment Financing District No. 1200. The Board of Commissioners of the HRA has approved an amendment to the Redevelopment Plan which is entitled "1990 Amendment to the 50th & France Redevelopment Plan "(the "1990 Amendment "). The 1990 Amendment authorizes additional public improvements to be constructed in the area subject to the Redevelopment Plan, expands the area subject to the Redevelopment Plan to include the area subject to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan of the BRA (the "Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan ") and authorizes the expenditure of tax increment revenues derived from the District to pay the costs of such public improvements and to pay for public redevelopment costs incurred and to be incurred by the HRA and the City in connection with the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan and redevelopment projects undertaken pursuant thereto and to pledge tax increment revenue from the District to the payment of debt service on bonds heretofore and hereafter issued by the City to finance such costs. 2. This Council on March 26, 1990, held a public hearing on the 1990 Amendment after notice of the public hearing was published in the official newspaper of the City not less than ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing. At such public hearing all persons desiring to be heard with respect to the 1990 Amendment were given an opportunity to express their views with respect thereto. 3. The 1990 Amendment is hereby approved. The 1990 Amendment serves to meet the goals and objectives of the Redevelopment Plan and the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision 4, and for reasons set forth in the Redevelopment Plan, as amended by the 1990 Amendment and the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan it is hereby found that: (A) The proposed development to be undertaken in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan, as amended by the 1990 Amendment and the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, in the opinion of this Council would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and therefor the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. (B) The Redevelopment Plan, as amended by the 1990 Amendment, conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. (C) The Redevelopment Plan, as amended by the 1990 Amendment, will afford maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole for the development of the area subject to the Redevelopment Plan and the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan. 4. Pledge of Tax Increment. The City has previously issued and there is presently outstanding the following bonds to finance public redevelopment costs incurred by the City and HRA pursuant to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "Bonds "): The•City hereby pledges to the Bonds tax increment revenue derived from the District received by the City from the MICA to pay the Bonds. The officers of the City are hereby authorized to enter into an agreement or agreements with the HRA to evidence such pledge of the tax increment revenue from the District to the payment of debt service on the Bonds. Adopted by the Council this 26th day of March, 1990. FAV4 * *6 City Clerk Mayor Title - Dated Original Principal Amount a. G.O. Tax Increment October 1, 1981 $4,500,000 Bonds, Series 1981 b. G.O. Tax Increment August 1, 1986 4,000,000 Bonds, Series 1986A c. G.O. Tax Increment October 1, 1988 10,175,000 Bonds, Series 1988 d. G.O. Taxable Tax October 1, 1988 5,100,000 Increment Bonds, Series 1988 e. G.O. Taxable Tax April 1, 1989 5,300,000 Increment Bonds, Series 1989 f. G.O. Tax Increment April 1, 1989 8,425,000 Bonds, Series 1989 g. G.O. Tax Increment November 1, 1989 12,970,000 Refunding Bonds, Series 1989 The•City hereby pledges to the Bonds tax increment revenue derived from the District received by the City from the MICA to pay the Bonds. The officers of the City are hereby authorized to enter into an agreement or agreements with the HRA to evidence such pledge of the tax increment revenue from the District to the payment of debt service on the Bonds. Adopted by the Council this 26th day of March, 1990. FAV4 * *6 City Clerk Mayor i Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Paulus. Rollcall: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. There being no further business on the HRA /Council Agenda, the meeting was adjourned at 7:14 p.m. by motion of Commissioner/Member Smith, seconded by Commissioner/Member Rice. Motion carried unanimously. HRA Executive Director City Clerk A. oe71 ch o �=� y A a � • RPOiN tiO/ 1 298 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: HRA AND COUNCIL From: GORDON L. HUGHES EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Date: MAY 7, 1990 Subject: REBATE OF EXCESS TAX INCREMENT Recommendation: Agenda Item # HWCOUNCIL II. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance 0 Discussion Continued from April 16, 1990 regular Council meeting. Info /Background: ;r . i • �VR7q'trpp/..�� REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: HRA AND COUNCIL From: GORDON L. HUGHES i EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Date: APRIL 16, 1990 Subject: REBATE OF EXCESS TAX INCRFIIENT Recommendation: Agenda Item # HRA COUNCIL III. Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends To HRA To Council Action �! Motion Resolution L' Ordinance Discussion Consider rebate to Edina School District of Excess Tax Increments from 50th & France and Grandview tax increment financing districts resulting from the 1988 School District Referendum. Info/Background- Attached is a letter dated March 30, 1990, from James Hamann, Assistant Superintendent of Business Services for the Edina Public Schools. This letter renews the request of the Board of Education that the City rebate tax increments which resulted from the 1988 School Tax Referendum. This request was considered but not acted upon by the City Council at its July 24, 1989 meeting. Attached for your review is a copy of the July 24, 1989, staff report. According to our information, the 1990 payable increments resulting from the 1988 referendum, total $57,535. According to Dr. Hamman's letter of 'larch 30, 1990, the return of this amount of excess increments would not result in additional revenues for the school district. Rather, it would result in a reduction in the school's mill rate. In that the school's _ levy has already been certified for 1990 payable taxes, a rebate, if approved, should be for the payable 1991 taxes. Report /Recommendation April 16, 1990 Page Two When this issue was considered in July of 1989, staff understood that the rebate of the excess increments would result in additional revenues to the school district. Apparently this is not the case, based on Dr. Hamman's March 30, 1990, letter. Therefore I am concerned as to whether there is any real benefit that is derived by the district from this rebate. If the Council wishes to proceed with this rebate, I suggest that it be instituted for payable 1991 taxes and that the amount of the rebate should be conditioned on the collection of at least 95% of the taxes from each tax increment financing district, i.e., no more than a 58 delinquency rate of total tax revenue. I would also recommend that the rebate be applied only for 1991 and that it be considered annually thereafter. E "C.ARE YE DARE SHARE ova, �701 March 30, 1990 Mr. Fred Richards, Mayor Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Fred, PUBLIC S C H 0 0 L S This letter is a follow -up to a recent conversation that I understand you had with Sarah Jones, Chairperson of the Edina. Board of Education. The purpose of that conversation as well as this letter is to ask that you consider putting the matter of excess tax increment revenue from the 1988 school tax referendum before the Edina City Council. Enclosed with this letter is a copy of the resolution approved by the Board of Education several months ago as well as Superintendent Smyth's letter to the City Manager. The background information to the resolution explains how the excess revenue concept works. If the shift of revenue from the city to the school district is approved it will not actually increase revenue for the school district. The district's subsequent levy authority (to be approved in the fall of 1990 for the school year 1991 -92) will be reduced by the amount of the excess tax increment revenue. In effect, the whole thing is revenue neutral for the school district. With the reduction adjustment to the levy authority there is, of course, a small reduction to Edina taxpayers. This is an excellent opportunity for the Edina City Council and the Edina Board of Education to work together in a way that will benefit the tax - paying citizens in the school district who are also residents of the city by reducing-taxes slightly. It is not a significant amount of tax dollars, but nevertheless an opportunity for some positive publicity in the community through a joint effort of the two local taxing authorities. If you would like to discuss this matter further please do not hesitate to give me a call or you may wish to visit with Gordon Hughes on the city staff. Gordon and I have studied this matter together so that we are both knowledgeable about it. 6701 Sincerely, ORMANDALE i James A. Hamann DINA Assistant Superintendent for Business Services M I N N E S O T A 56424 JAH /mef Enc. cc: Sarah Jones 612- 920.2980 Ray Smyth N E O A A E N A R E 000, - - . P - U B - L I C S C N 0 O L S „ye, June. 22, 1989 Mr. Ken Rosland, City Manager Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Ken, You may be aware that legislation passed during the 1988 session provides for some changes with respect to tax increment financing districts. One of the changes makes it permissible for a city to rebate to a school district excess tax increment revenue generated by a school district referendum levy. The Edina Board of Education recently approved a resolution to request that such a rebate be made. I have enclosed a copy of that resolution. The purpose of this letter is to ask you to put this matter on the agenda of a future meeting of the Edina City Council for consideration. Members of your staff, Gordon Hughes and Erik Anderson, have met with Jim Hamann on this to review the provision in the law and to work up the financial numbers. You may want to visit with any or all of them for more information. Your early attention to resolution of this request by the Board of Education will be very much appreciated-. Sincl6reW, Rayr coa P. Smyth F 1 F T r F I v E Su¢¢erintendent FTr FIVE mef Enc. ,T 7 0 T N S T R E E T E 0 1 N A M N 5 5 4 3 5 619_AAA.9R11 689 FOR ACTION INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 273 Regular Meeting, June 12, 1989 Volume 60, Report 603 SUBJECT: EXCESS TAX INCREMENT REVENUE FROM THE 1988 REFERENDUM Be it Resolved, That The Board of Education Request the Edina City Council to rebate the excess tax increment revenue resulting from the 1988 referendum for the fiscal year 1989 -90 and annually thereafter. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The City of Edina contains four tax increment financing districts, two of which (50th and France District and Grandview District) are inclusive within the school district. when these TIF districts were established the base or first year valuation of the districts was captured for taxing jurisdictions such as the school district or county, which means that tax revenue for the school district from the TIF districts remains fixed for a 20 to 25 year period. Because the TIF districts do increase in value the- city is able to generate incremental tax revenue (difference between the fixed amount and current or incremental valuation). These incremental tax revenues are used to retire the development bonds and other costs of development. When the voters of the school district authorized by referendum an additional levy, the result of applying the additional levy on the incremental or current value is the generation of "windfall" revenue to the development (TIF) district. This phenomenon directs revenue to the TIF district through no action on the part of the city instead of producing revenue for the school district for whose benefit the levy was created. The 1988 amendments to the Minnesota Tax Increment Financing Act include a provision whereby a city with tax increment financing districts may pay excess tax increment revenue generated by a referendum levy to the school district o O • � ~nJR10W`���� aas REPORT /RECOMMENDATION T0: HRA From: GORDON L. HUGHES EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Date: JULY 24, 1989 Subject: EXCESS TAX INCREMENT REVENUE - 50TH & FRANCE AND GRANDVIEW Recommendation: Agenda Item # HRA II. Consent ❑ - - Information Only Mgr . Recommends HE To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Authorize the rebating to the Edina School District of excess tax increments from 50th & France and Grandview resulting from the 1988 school district referendum for payable 1989 taxes. Rebate to occur after the receipt of 1989 tax settlement and conditioned upon a collection of at least 95% of expected taxes. Info/Background- Attached is a letter and a Resolution from the Edina School District concerning excess tax increments from the Grandview and 50th & France tax increment districts. As noted in the Board's resolution, the voters of the Edina school district authorized an additional levy in October, 1988. This additional levy resulted in a higher mill rate (i.e. tax capacity rate) within the 50th & France and Grandview tax increment districts. This increased mill rate resulted in a tax increment windfall for these two districts in the amount of $49,060 for payable 1989 taxes. As noted in the Board's resolution, 1988 amendments to the Tax Increment Financing Act include a provision whereby the City can rebate to school districts the excess tax increment generated by a referendum levy. According to the Tax Increment Financing Act, the City may elect to rebate such excess increments but is not obligated to do so. Report /Recommendation Excess Tax Increment Revenue] July 24, 1989 Page Two Based upon the above facts and circumstances, the Edina School District -_ -.. requests that the City authorize the rebate of the excess increments. The Board's resolution requests that this rebate.start with the 1989 tax increments and continue annually thereafter. Due to ongoing changes in tax increment financing laws, staff recommends that the rebate be authorized for the payable 1989 tax increments only, and that this resolution should be reviewed and considered annually in regard to future payments of excess increments. We also recommend that the amount of the rebate should be conditioned on the collection of at least 95% of the taxes from each district, i.e., no more than a S% delinquency rate of total tax revenue. gtrls. J�l� REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: HRA FROM: Gordon Hughes, E;;ecutive Director VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: May 7, 1990 AGENDA ITEM I I I. A. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Improvement No. PL -2 Centennial Lakes North Pond Wall & Liner Company Amount of Quote or &d 1. F. M. Frattalone Excavating &.Grading Inc. 1. $ 625,386.66 2. Lovering- Johnson,.Inc. 2.. $ 642,282.25 3• George F. Cook Construction Co. 3. $ 670,026.61 4. Veit & Company, Inc. 4. $ 697,386.13 5. C. S. McCrossan Construction, Inc. 5. $1,064,997.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: F. M. Frattalone. Excavating &•Grading, Inc. $ 625,386.66 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is the construction project for Centennial Lakes Phase 1 Lake Construction - North Pond. This project will complete the north pond with sodding over the balance of the north park and sodding and irrigation on the east portion of the central park. The project will be funded through HRA funds. The Recommended bid is within budget not within ) Department ,rd n allin, Finance Direct " r th Rosland, ity Manager , 'p? Cn REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: HRA FROM:. Gordon .Hughes, Assistant City Manager VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00 DATE: May 7, 1990 AGENDA ITEM HRA III.s. ITEM. DESCRIPTION: Centennial Lakes Central Park West Side Improvements Companv Amount of Quote or &d 1. Shaw- Lundquist_ Assoc. 1, $1,496,790.20 2. Cy -Con, Inc. 2. 1,524,654:50 3. C. S. McCrossan 3, 1,588,820.16 4. Lovering- Johnson, Inc. 4, 1,606,819.00 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Shaw- Lundquist Assoc. $1,496,790.20 GENERAL INFORMATION: This bid is for the walkways, lighting,.landscaping, and all related work for the west side of central park. The project will be- funded through HRA funds as part of the Centennial Lakes project. Signature The Recommended bid is Department. f: �i within budget not withiwbu0g-e/t Kenneth Roslan6, City Manager ti 1^ o e'' H o ti ��• f ~R]RI'OM'�O� REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: HRA From: GORDON HUGHES � ASSISTANT CIT GER Date: MAY 7, 1990 Subject: CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK IMPROVEMENT — WEST SIDE Recommendation: Agenda Item # HRA III . B. Consent ❑ Information Only [ 7x Mgr. Recommends To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion _ ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Attached is a letter from Borgert Products, Inc. regarding the concrete pavers which were specified for Centennial Lakes. Borgert objects to the fact that its concrete paver was not accepted for use at Centennial Lakes. Also attached is a letter from Arijs Pakalns of BRW which explains BRI -I's reasoning in rejecting this prodict. I concur with BRW's recommendation. Info /Background: 0 T H U 1 2 47 D 0 R G E R T C ID N C P. E T E p . 02 • 8646 RIDGEWObD RD; P.O. BOX 39 ST, JOSEPH, MN 66374 6121363-4671 MN 1-800. 622-4952 ld IN /I o! E __ 'z,7 14:44 BRW INC. BUR ?AW INC. THRESHER SQUARE May, 4, 1990 Mr. Gordon Hughes Assisstant City Manager City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Gordon: 700 THIRD STREET SGU7,. MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55415 P. PANNING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING URBAN DESIGN P',ONE: 412. 370.0700 FAX: 812�370.1378 In regards to the special concrete unit pavers for the Centennial Lakes Park, the following is a brief summary of the process we went through in selecting the pavers. Initially, in the early stages of the design for the Park, the decision was made to use high - quality materials to complement the high- quality developments being proposed for the project. For this reason, we selected the concrete pavers which are manufactured by Courtland Landscape Products as our standard. In the construction documents we indicated that the Courtland pavers are an accepted paver but that we would approve other pavers, if they would meet our established standards. During the bid period, Borgert Products, Inc. asked us to accept their pavers as an approved equal. We met with the Borgert representatives, received all necessary information and obtained sample pavers for out review. In our evaluation we found that the Borgert pavers do not meet our standards: • The surface finish is rough and very porous. • The beveled edges are highly pronounced and noticeable. • The edge finish is rough and easily chipped. • The corners are quite rounded, which would exposes larger joints -- especially in the curving band.patterns. ° Overall, the Borgert pavers have too much.of a "rustic" and rough appearance which we think is not appropriate for this project. For these reasons we feel we could not accept the Borgert pavers as an approved equal. Or '�E SENNF r r Gt ALN R..NC , K, Y .1•:IU. __' +'JCTT ,..•c_ : i�'AlG'N R�NCiyCiSh •'.k.r' ?r1C:P:J.;. ... h'_..1 �" . �i .•:V /.iehC :. ..:.i�ONE� MARK ii .GI:N O '&N.MARA i CJ 11;CG 3 F'IL;Dn 4t :.FNNI4.1.:;U1 L.F •. = PFRC'r I F -V }:: i'I - _. , �. _ ::A1 .`.+VIU L. GAP,' LNW MINNEAPOLIS DENVER PHOENIX TUCSON ST PETERSBURG SEP 03 '90 14:45 BRW INCo Mr. Gordon Hughes May 5, 1990 Page 2 P. I hope this clarifies the issue. If you have any queestions, please call me. Si nc rel Arijs Pakalns AIA,AICP Senior Associate cc: Peter Jarvis, BRW, Inc. AP /akm DATE: MAY 6, 1990 RE: CONCRETE PAVERS AT CENTENNIAL LAKES, EDINA APRIL 17, 1990 Delivered samples to Arijs Pakalns at B.R.W. 1) Requested pave edge as alternate to angle iron. 2) Borgert Products paving stone samples as alternate. Comments from Arijs Pakalns of B.R.W. 1) Size not right. 2) Need color samples. APRIL 19, 1990 Delivered to Arijs Pakalns of B.R.W. 1) Red and brown flash as specified by Mr. Pakalns. 2) Measured stone for consistency of length and width. Comments, from Arijs Pakalns of B.R.W. 1) Color not quite there. 2) Size would be alright. Drove to job to visually inspect the color 1) I determined that color was a red, charcoal, brown mixture. 2) 1 telephoned Mr. Pakalns from the job site to discuss the color and he told me that the samples I left of the red, brown did look pretty good. APRIL 23, 1990 Delivered samples of red, brown, charcoal blend to Arijs Pakalns via courier. APRIL 25, 1990 Telephoned Arijs Pakalns of B.R.W. for comment on new samples 1) Color was fine. 2) Size was fine. 3). Bevelled edge not acceptable. 4) Texture not acceptable. 5) He informed me that the decision was made by a committee. page 2 I asked Mr. Pakalns if I could meet with some or all of the committee people at the job to compare pavers already installed. 1) Mr. Pakalns response was negative. Edina City Hall - I talked with Mr. Gordon Hughes about the problems I was having in getting the paving stones approved. 1) Mr. Hughes said he would call Arijs Pakalns about the matter. APRIL, 26, 1990 Telephoned Gordon Hughes to inquire about the response he received from Mr. Pakalns . 1) Response from Mr. Hughes was that as a committee B.R.W. had not accepted paving stone for same reasons discussed on April 25. I asked Gordon what my next step would be if 1. wished to proceed in this matter. 1) Gordon informed me that I should get on the agenda for the city council meeting scheduled for May 7th, which is the same date that the job is to be let. If the job would have been specified, "manufacturer of product and or equal ", there would have been no problem with bidding this job in the normal procedure. By having Division 1 and leaving all acceptable product decisions up to one person or committee only one product may be specified, even if products vary only slightly. I feel very strongly that it is a diservice to the taxpayer to have only one material specified . I do feel that more than one product, (in each category), should not only be a responsiblilty but a requirment to insure that taxpayers who support these types of projects are getting quality as well as competative bids. Borgert Products was one to the first manufacturers of concrete pavers in the United States, the first in the State of Minnesota. We manufacture our pavers on one of the- finest most advance machines available in the world ty9i��lj, tt\' REQUEST FOR P R .�°i U CHASE TO: HRA FROM: GORDON L. HUGHES, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager - SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 MAY 7, 1990 DATE: AGENDA ITEM HRA i I I . C ITEM DESCRIPTION: CENTENNIAL LAKE PARK PAVILLION - GENERAL CONSTRUCTION Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1• TWIN -CITY CONSTRUCTION 1• $ 649.,543 2• LUND- MARTIN 2• 659,350 3• LOVERING- JOHNSON, 3• 765,600 4• SHAW - LUNDQUIST 4• 808,800 5•. PALANI 5. 830,000 6. UNIPRO 6. 910,000 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: TWIN CITY CONSTRUCTION $649,543 GENERAL INFORMATION: This bid.is for general construction for,the Centennial Lakes park pavillion. Signature / Depart ent The Recommended bid is within budget not witWh dget. Wallin, Fi, rice Direct L. Kenneth Ro and, City Manager t. ch • ,N�APOW`S��/ ieee REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Francis Hoffman City Engineer Date: 7 May, 1990 Subject: Public Hearing - Sidewalk W. 42nd St. from West City Limits to France Ave. Improvement No. S -47 Recommendation: Agenda Item # III' A- Consent ❑ ch • ,N�APOW`S��/ ieee REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Francis Hoffman City Engineer Date: 7 May, 1990 Subject: Public Hearing - Sidewalk W. 42nd St. from West City Limits to France Ave. Improvement No. S -47 Recommendation: Agenda Item # III' A- Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion A. Authorize Improvement Project S -47. B. If deemed appropriate, indicate Council direction for size of assessment area, Area 1 (larger area) or Area 2 (smaller area). Info/Background- City Council received a petition for a sidewalk on West 42nd Street from the west City limits to France Avenue. The petition included 91 signatures of which all were within Area 1 on attached hearing notice map. Of the 91 signatures, twenty six signatures were outside of Area 2 (smaller proposed assessment area). Also attached is a portion of the Edina Comprehensive Land Use Plan as it relates to sidewalks. This is the 1980 plan which will be updated during 1990 as it relates to sidewalks. Staff believes that the petition submitted for sidewalk is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. (M Report /Recommendation Public Hearing - Sidewalk W. 42nd Street from West City Limits to France Ave. Improvement No. 5 -47 Page Two The proposed project would be to place sidewalk on the south side of West 42nd Street from the west City limits to Grimes Avenue because existing side street sidewalks would tie -in the proposed walkway. The proposed sidewalk location-from Grimes to France on West 42nd would be the north side due to ease of construction on the north versus south side. The cross -over point at Grimes and West 42nd Street would be considered safe since a 4 -way STOP sign condition exists. The proposed project cost is estimated at $95,278.86 which would result in an estimated assessment of $245.56 for each lot in Area 1 or if Area 2 is used, an estimated assessment of $560.46 per lot. Also, a note from the previous Morningside reconstruction project in 1978 -79, all lots were assessed the same per lineal foot assessment of $29.40 per assessable foot. (This means that people with or without sidewalk in that project were not treated differently.) Staff will make a full presentation at the Council meeting. Attached is all correspondence received on this issue to date. Report /Recommendation Public Hearing - Sidewalk W. 42nd Street from West City Limits to France Ave. Improvement No. 5 -47 Page Two The proposed project would be to place sidewalk on the south side of West 42nd Street from the west City limits to Grimes Avenue because existing side street sidewalks would tie -in the proposed walkway. The proposed sidewalk location-from Grimes to France on West 42nd would be the north side due to ease of construction on the north versus south side. The cross -over point at Grimes and West 42nd Street would be considered safe since a 4 -way STOP sign condition exists. The proposed project cost is estimated at $95,278.86 which would result in an estimated assessment of $245.56 for each lot in Area 1 or if Area 2 is used, an estimated assessment of $560.46 per lot. Also, a note from the previous Morningside reconstruction project in 1978 -79, all lots were assessed the same per lineal foot assessment of $29.40 per assessable foot. (This means that people with or without sidewalk in that project were not treated differently.) Staff will make a full presentation at the Council meeting. Attached is all correspondence received on this issue to date. E Ian NOTICE OF PUBLIC BEARING SIDEWALK IMPROVEMIINP NO. S -47 The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City,Hall on Monday, May 7, 1990 at 7:00 P.M. to hold a formal Public Hearing on the construction of sidewalk on West 42nd Street from France Avenue to the West City Limits of Edina. This hearing has been called as a result of a petition from 91 residents in this area for better pedestrian access to Weber Park, school bus stops, the France Avenue MTC bus stop and generally as a connector route. This hearing is being con- ducted under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. The pro- posed sidewalk will be located on the south side from the west City Limits' on West 42nd Street to Grimes- Avenue. East of Grimes, the sidewalk would be on the north side of West 42nd Street going to France Avenue. This is considered a formal hearing since it is proposed that the entire cost of the improvement be paid from assessments. Under present City policy, mainte- nance (snow removal) of the sidewalk will be the responsibility of the adjacent property owners. The estimated construction cost of the project is $95,278.86. The proposed assessment would be between $245.56 and $560.46 per lot, depending on the actual assessment area. The first proposed assessment area is the largest suggested area and includes all petitioners for this project. See attached map. The second proposed assessment area is a smaller suggested area which does not include all the petitioners but would be more consistent with the potential as- sessment district for this type of project. See attached map. These proposed assessments would be divided over a ten year period with interest accumulating on the unpaid balance. The sidewalk is- proposed to be five feet wide and constructed of concrete. The alignment will be varied to protect existing property features to the greatest extent possible. The proposed project would be constructed in 1990. Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those properties which are considered to be benefited by the improvement. Notice of Public Hearing Sidewalk Improvement 5 -47 Page Two The area that may be assessed for the proposed improvement is as follows: c Tract A, RLS 567; Tracts A, B, C, D & E, RLS 650; Tracts A & B, RLS 1517; Lots 1 thru 3 & 8 thru 11, Blk. 1, Lots 1 thru 9, Blk. 2, & Lots 1 thru 9, Blk. 3, Morningside Oaks Addn.; Lots 1 thru 10 & 12 & 13, Blk. 1, Lots 1 thru 19 & 22 thru 26, Blk. 2, Lots 1 thru 19 & 22 thru 26, Blk. 3, & Lots 1 thru 18 & 21 thru 26, Blk. 4, Minikanda Vista Third Addn.; Lots 1 thru 14, 16 & 17 & 19 & 20, William Scott's Addn.; Lots 1 thru 4, Blk. 1, William Scott's Addn. Peterson Replat; Lots 1 thru 12, A and B Addn.; Lots 1 & 2, Blk. 1, Lots 1 & 2, Blk. 2, and Outlots 1 and 2, Morningside Manor; Lots 1 thru 8, Blk. 1, & Lots 1 thru 12, Blk. 2, Mickelsen's Re- arrangement Morningside Minn.; Lots 1 thru 5, Wooddale Heights 2nd Addn.; Lots 1 thru 26, Blk. 1, Lots 1 thru 26, Blk. 2, and Lots 8 thru 19, Blk. 3, Crocker & Crowell's First Addn.; Lots 1 & 2, Blk. 1, Morine's Addn.; and Lots 14 thru 78, Morningside Addn. Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding this improve- ment may be forwarded to -the City Council or Engineering Department prior to the hearing or presented at the hearing itself. If you desire additional informa- tion, please call me at 927 -8861 between 8:00 A.M. and 4:30 P.M., Monday through Friday. The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of the hearing. Thank you. Francis J."Hoffman, P.E. Director of Public Works and City Engineer FJH /clf f'. _. L Notice of Public Hearing Sidewalk Improvement 5 -47 Page Two The area that may be assessed for the proposed improvement is as follows: c Tract A, RLS 567; Tracts A, B, C, D & E, RLS 650; Tracts A & B, RLS 1517; Lots 1 thru 3 & 8 thru 11, Blk. 1, Lots 1 thru 9, Blk. 2, & Lots 1 thru 9, Blk. 3, Morningside Oaks Addn.; Lots 1 thru 10 & 12 & 13, Blk. 1, Lots 1 thru 19 & 22 thru 26, Blk. 2, Lots 1 thru 19 & 22 thru 26, Blk. 3, & Lots 1 thru 18 & 21 thru 26, Blk. 4, Minikanda Vista Third Addn.; Lots 1 thru 14, 16 & 17 & 19 & 20, William Scott's Addn.; Lots 1 thru 4, Blk. 1, William Scott's Addn. Peterson Replat; Lots 1 thru 12, A and B Addn.; Lots 1 & 2, Blk. 1, Lots 1 & 2, Blk. 2, and Outlots 1 and 2, Morningside Manor; Lots 1 thru 8, Blk. 1, & Lots 1 thru 12, Blk. 2, Mickelsen's Re- arrangement Morningside Minn.; Lots 1 thru 5, Wooddale Heights 2nd Addn.; Lots 1 thru 26, Blk. 1, Lots 1 thru 26, Blk. 2, and Lots 8 thru 19, Blk. 3, Crocker & Crowell's First Addn.; Lots 1 & 2, Blk. 1, Morine's Addn.; and Lots 14 thru 78, Morningside Addn. Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding this improve- ment may be forwarded to -the City Council or Engineering Department prior to the hearing or presented at the hearing itself. If you desire additional informa- tion, please call me at 927 -8861 between 8:00 A.M. and 4:30 P.M., Monday through Friday. The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of the hearing. Thank you. Francis J."Hoffman, P.E. Director of Public Works and City Engineer FJH /clf PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AREA 1 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AREA 2 SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S-47 _ Z , - -a �� CALVIN � CHRISTIA ��- SCHOOL %.CQMMNfTy`Buy D T zi Zi ;+N9Eq r*-r41 bT cr Y I IT I _1 ` u yl o o ~ ct I L L L Comprehensive Land Use Plan Transportation Element Page 17 IV. Bicycle and Pedestrian System The demand for increased attention to facilities for bicycles and pedestrians is expected to be strong throughout the 1980's. A variety of reasons, including energy awareness and physical exercise,will require increased investment, both public and private, in the City's facilities to accomodate bicycle and pedestrian traffic. Goal: Provide facilities for pedestrians and bicycles that serve the transportation and recreation needs of Edina residents, and that operates without conflict with other transportation modes. A. Pedestrian Paths (Sidewalks) An excellent street and highway system, and the availability of cheap gas during the period of rapid growth in Edina,made the provision of sidewalks in new subdivisions unnecessary_. Since that time circumstances have changed dramatically and the demand for -_*- ^edestrian rou —c = ^d will continue to increase during the planning period. Sidewalks and other pedestrian paths serve two important functions: the provision of safe lanes for recreation; and the provision of access lanes to opportunities. By providing a system that gives pedestrian access to opportunities (employment centers, commercial centers, parks, entertainment facilities), most of the demand for recreation (exercise) can be satisfied. Existing sidewalks in the City are concentrated in the Morningside and Country Club neighborhoods where development occurred prior to 1930.. After 1930, when the private automobile began to take over for the street cars few sidewalks were provided. Map T -7 details the existing sidewalk system in Edina. Recently, a more general awareness of the need for a sidewalk system has developed. The need for an improved and expanded sidewalk system in Edina has been studied by the League of Women Voters, by a Citizens Task Force, and by City staff. The recommendations of these studies have been synthesized in the proposed sidewalk system shown on Map T -7. Objective: To provide a rational system of sidewalks that will enhance pedestrian safety, encourage non - motorized transportation and improve access to public transit and activity centers: Comprehensive Land Use Plan Transportation Element Page 18 Policies: Provide short link sidewalks that improve and connect the existing system. Provide sidewalks and safe crossing in high pedestrian danger areas, including high traffic streets, and commercial areas. areas. Provide sidewalks for transit access. Provide sidewalks in high density residential areas. Provide sidewalk links within the Southdale major activity center. Provide sidewalk links to public service centers, and recreation Provide sidewalk access to major employment centers. B. Bikeways. The drive to provide safe and suitable paths for bicycles began in Edina in the early 1-11— a 1 —nn —1 1_ity staff committees have been actively involved in planning a system of bike paths for Edina. Early planning efforts were directed toward providing bike paths for recreation and to provide connections to high activity Cityparks. During the planning period demand for a wider variety of use and access is anticipated. The system of bikeways in Edina will expand as a result of increased demand for access to employment centers, shopping, and recreation areas. Although the ideal solution to providing bike paths is to provide paths that are completely separated from public streets, it should be realized that in many sections of the City it is not financially or physically feasible. In low density, low traffic residential areas, the public street system and sidewalk system must serve as the connecting link to the principal bike path system. Objective: To provide a system of bike paths that resonds to the needs of Edina residents for recreation and non - motorized commuting. Policies: Complete the proposed bike path system around major activity parks, including neighborhood links. Yr January 22, 1990 Ms. Marcella Daehn, City Clerk City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Ms. Daehn: Enclosed please find seven pages of a petition requesting a sidewalk on West 42nd Street. The petitioners are requesting, pursuant to MN Statutes Chapter 429, that the City of Edina install a sidewalk on West 42nd Street between France Avenue and the City limits (Oakdale Street). There are two categories of petitioners: owners of property along West 42nd Street, and owners of property on side streets adjacent to West 42nd Street. Owners of side street property will benefit directly from a sidewalk on 42nd Street since residents of the area use 42nd Street to walk to Weber Park, school bus stops, the France Avenue MTC bus stop, and generally as a connector route. The undersigned Ms. Guerin spoke with the City Engineer last summer regarding the procedural steps leading a City Council meeting on the sidewalk issue. As we understand the procedure, your office will verify the signatures'-status as property owners, and you will also determine the percentage of 42nd Street property owners who have signed. We believe that more than 35% of the owners have signed. Please note that Weber Park abuts a large section of the street. According to the City Engineer (Mr. Fran Hoffman), after your office verifies the signatures, you will forward the petition to Mr. Hoffman's office where they will do a preliminary cost assessment. Mr. Hoffman gave a rough estimate of $1,000 per lot if the City installs a sidewalk on both sides of the street. We understand that residents may choose to pay any amount assessed in up to 30 annual installments. Since we believe that residents of the adjacent side streets will benefit from a 42nd Street sidewalk,.we will ask the City to assess construction costs upon both the 42nd Street property and the side street property. Ms. Marcella Daehn January 22, 1990 Page 2 Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 also provides that there will be at least two City Council meetings prior to the assessment of any sidewalk construction costs. First, after mailed a published notice, the City Council will meet and vote on a sidewalk resolution. The City Engineer will determine the exact cost of the sidewalk construction. Not only will property owners have an opportunity to review proposed assessments prior to the Council's approval of those assessments, but the City Clerk will also mail and publish notice of any meeting at which the Council considers the assessments. Mr Hoffman estimated that it would be six to eight weeks between the time that you receive this petition and the time of the City Council meeting to consider the sidewalk issue. Therefore, we are assuming that the City Council will be able to consider this issue in late February or early March. Please contact the undersigned if you have any questions about the petitions or if our understanding of the procedure is incorrect. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, , I,, -t - - ;I - � doz��� 6� ;-� (: CL� Ellen Guerin 4406 West 42nd Street Edina, MN 55416 922 -3205 Enclosure PC /bjc Pat Corcoran 4109 Monterey Avenue So. Edina, MN. 55416 926 -7634 PETITION FOR SIDEWALK To The Edina City Council: Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, we the undersigned hereby petition for the construction of a sidewalk on West 42nd Street between Oakdale Street and France Avenue in the City of Edina, and the undersigned represent that they are owners of property which will benefit from this improvement, including but not limited to property directly abutting West 42nd Street. PETITION FOR SIDEWALK To The Edina City Council: Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, we the undersigned hereby petition for the construction of a sidewalk,on West 42nd Street between Oakdale Street and France Avenue in the City of Edina, and the undersigned represent that they are owners of property which will benefit from this improvement, including but not limited to property directly abutting West 42nd Street. PETITION FOR SIDEWALK To The Edina City Council: Pursuant -to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, we the undersigned hereby petition for the construction of a sidewalk on West 42nd Street between Oakdale Street and France Avenue in the City of Edina, and the undersigned represent that they are owners of property which will benefit from this improvement, including but not limited to property directly abutting West 42nd Street. r PETITION FOR SIDEWALK To The Edina City Council: _- Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, we the undersigned hereby petition for the construction of a sidewalk on West 42nd Street between Oakdale Street and France Avenue in the City of Edina, and the undersigned represent that they are owners of property which will benefit from this improvement, including but not limited to property directly abutting West 42nd Street. � I D PETITION FOR SIDEWALK To The Edina City Council:. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, we the undersigned hereby petition for the construction of a sidewalk on West 42nd Street between Oakdale Street and France Avenue in the City of Edina, and the undersigned represent that they are owners of property which will benefit from this improvement, including but not limited to property directly abutting West 42nd Street. 0 x-20 5 �zG? PETITION FOR SIDEWALK To The Edina City Council: Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, we the undersigned hereby petition for the construction of a sidewalk on West 42nd Street between Oakdale Street and France Avenue in the City of Edina, -and the undersigned represent that they are owners of property which will benefit from this improvement, including but not limited to property directly abutting West 42nd Street. tZI/ 141, AIV A,�s Ae" 0 PETITION FOR SIDEWALK To The Edina City Council: Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter-429, we the undersigned hereby petition for the construction of a sidewalk on West 42nd Street between Oakdale Street and France Avenue in the City of Edina, and the undersigned represent that they are owners of property which will benefit from this improvement, including but not limited to property directly abutting West 42nd Street. Herb Knox 4245 .Aden Drive Edina, MN 55416 May 3, 1990 Mr. Francis J. Hoffman Director of Public Works City of Edina The attached list of about 175 residents indicated their endorsement -of the statement at the tci. ,f the first page expressing opposition to "Sidewalk Improvement No. 47" as it is being proposed. To the best of my knowledge, only affected home owners signed the informal petition, with one exception - the cd.retaker for a lady with advanced Parkinson's disease who could not write. Before the petition was circulated, your office. was asked to confirm or correct the general impression that the cost of the sidewalks installed some ten years ago was assessed entirely to the -homes where the sidewalks were installed, and not shared by areas where no sidewalks were put in. The answer given by the assistant was "that is absolutely right ". Yrhen it was learned Thursday Lfternoon that your study of the records indicated otherwise, efforts to collect more signatures were stopped because I was not sure I could give people accurate information on this point. If it turns out you are right, it should be understood that the earlier information ,iven. by your office resulted? 4.r, several households signing the list who otherwise would not have done so. Also, theee households were encountered where one spouse signed and the other disagreed. Thank you fo.-- your attention. Sincerely, Herb Knox ,��•%� -, l4 =lam �_' c ��c. -.,� -c �.'w.� _ ,V ,��•%� -, l4 =lam �_' c ��c. -.,� -c �.'w.� 71-AC UZOd r—X 711CGl P L°Si'drtiYs QP )Vet # /' l pSlde jF � c�1'e D -PLe d �ho�cscd Ideavalk hs ,r?rovc�i�r -t/ 1r�a. S- t)L7.4 Ll,�st �t -2mil. Sze ,�'' � (� �.�•�- -t/� -� � --� `7 �� =off ==� -rte._. 44d all L .f; rr A4Z, � d (� �' .�� /„ t .J`�kc � yDlO iliv rte, n S: �� 1� • , r ,M���-'�'- G���. -1 �`���'T -1L r;�,,v11, rti.� `�," � '► , � -: G -J4, I� ��h � -. �, r 44 IL .."0" ........... . . s fi 5-5 1 yaa� �Id� p� , Ald env b2 q- oho 7 A-A- 4 � I &or-� 1� -7 IA e7 �4 '7 st - I ,3' - 4W-Al,l q2 23-s C s 44 "77 qc 3 --- -4z., q & v-irr,tu Cv sco A- 'do C/o ate 1� E Pei ! A76 ftf JA Wt MCA • WA, • jol ate 1� g . .. _..... -. 777 .. - G�1p_- '_..ww�e- .L_...... -.•T wwe +y+�b^+L.. . q'. c• .�ir.�M�:•Y�a.?,- '11�M- ��.F. - -. �..`�+ .�_ -.. __ .. -.._ r_.�.- ..�.�� \ 1 // LL �"i)n�711k—, -4111 1 j), J 2 *R.St 4 2 3 1 -- _ - -1�..� - —-- -- -. —_ -- PAP I op 7 . ME- _ 1 0 , AM1\ lye i ♦ i , 1 , I , , , I / /�l WNW OEM" I .L .s .! _ •�l �M4 4 2 3 1 -- _ - -1�..� - —-- -- -. —_ -- ' e April 30, 1990 Francis J. Hoffman, P.E. Director of Public Works /City Engineer City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 To Whom It May Concern: I shall attend the hearing, but wanted you to have in hand prior to that time the enclosed schematic indicating our route to Weber Park, and bus stops. In the 13 years we have lived at 4012 Kipling, we have yet to use 42nd street.for either park access or bus access. We use the #12 bus from Excelsior Avenue, as it runs more frequently and there are no hills to climb to get there. Sometimes, however, we'll take the France Avenue bus home. Then, the shortest route is through the park, north of the holding pond, though this is not always accessible in winter, when we use 39th Street. The shortest route to Weber Park is always through the alleyway at 41st street. I do not dispute the desirability of having a sidewalk on 42nd street, espe- cially in the area of the Montessori School. However, it will have little value to me and my children /grandchildren. I do not feel we ought to be asked to pay for something we will not use. Thank you for informing me of the hearing. I will attend. Cordially, Dolores A. Dege, Ph.D. 4012 Kipling Ave. Edina, MN 55416 919 -6268 (H) SIDEWALK IMPROV MENT NO. S-47 PROPOSED JJ� ASSESSMENT AREA 1 -� _ o i Z 1� CALVIN 7 CHRISTI S'C� • '`�� -x -� = �---r .i• Yk SCHOOL F �- �� is ,a, •'�' - o, ;vy�9ER I L P T IT PROPOSED ASSESSMENT 7 AREA 2 e r o V _ <'�' +� CALVIN _ r-- CHRISTIAN SCHOOL L z a--r--�cu ST CC Mill ;�'PiFtD� I I I _ w J ' 1 "CPNIGTE, ROAD James F. Mewborn 4004 Kipling Avenue Edina, MN 55416 April 30, 1990 Francis J. Hoffman, P.E. Director of Public Works and City Engineer City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Proposed Sidewalk Improvement No. S 7.47 Dear Mr. Hoffman: I have received your notice of a public hearing regarding the proposed sidewalk improvement No. S -47 for West 42nd Street. My family and I live at 4004 Kipling Avenue which is in the extreme northern portion of the proposed assessment area 1, approximately two blocks from West 42nd Street. I do not oppose the request of the residents living in the immediate vicinity of West 42nd Street to have a sidewalk installed (and I believe I may even have signed the petition at the request of someone who came to my door). However, I do not feel that the residents on the upper portion of Kipling Avenue have sufficient interest in or would be benefited by a sidewalk on West 42nd Street to justify including them within the assessment area. Simply put, I do not want to have to pay a special assessment of several hundred dollars in order to provide a sidewalk two blocks away that I would not be using. If the residents along West 42nd Street wish to have a sidewalk, I strongly recommend the adoption of your proposed assessment area 2, or an even smaller assessment area. JFM:shn cc: Edina City Council Very truly yours, James F. Mewborn V / - / 501 '5;; 6 . All 71— A 4�1 1,7 'p27 /I I/ 3c (1;, ciJ -W c 7— .1 A? Ap r i 1 30 City of Edina Engineering Dept. Re: Proposed Sidewalks - 42nd Street Sirs, A question? Why should the property owner be responsible for the total cost of a sidewalk on his property that will benefit everyone? Also, I would have the added cost of snow removal. Thank you. AgathA Ledin 4201 Oakdale 90 TAJ INTERNATIONAL HOTELS BUCKINGHAM GATE. LONDON SW IE 6AF PHONE NO: (01) 834 -6655 TELEX NO: 919557 TAJJAM G l� -2 iSt Z q i CI ("A G c y 1-301 wl t '>C t 11 St- X Ck�vYl C'- C�sv�l 1CJ 1 J J +Y CJYY\ n•v -\, L <, cfL 51 -14k, 1 -ate r0 a - cl-' -(_ cu , rry'r 1 C: b,Q, LC,'i -1 ., � T ;to.- �' 1�11 " Ile -f - il r-- a " al 4 � �- Rkhard A. `Walkovets 4200 Morni side Rd Edina, MC55416 2 le- ol .- -'0" a J '.� Imo, "'� . - /° D -S-C' V � / 14/'17 `/ at Mayor and City City of Edina 4601 West 50th Edina Mn.55424. Council St April 30th 1990 Dear Mr. Mayor and Council Members: We have received a Notice of Public Hearing related to the proposed construction of a sidewalk on 42nd St. It is underlined in the�Notice that our property at 4021 Monterey Ave. "is among those which are considered to be benefited by the improvement" and that we may therefore be included in the assessment area. Maps enclosed with the Notice show that this would be the case only if the assessment area was taken to be the larger of two suggested possibilities. We will not be able to attend the public hearing and we wish to register our strogest protest about being considered for inclusion in the assessment area. The proposed sidewalk would not benefit us at all: our children reach the elementary school bus stop at 40th and Monterey by'walking up Monterey, and the junior high bus stop (at 41st and Lynn) by walking along the public right of way which follows the 41st street line. This same easement provides us with safe pedestrian access to Weber park and its continuation leads to the MTC bus stop on France Ave. Our inclusion in the assessment area would be obviously unfair. The size of the larger of the proposed assessment areas is inconsistent with this type of project. The petitioners of this project did not canvass -in our block. Therefore, we expect you, as our representatives, to oppose this project unless the assessment area be reduced to, at the most, the smaller of the two suggested areas in the map included with the Notice. Sincerely, Oriol & Maureen Valls 4021 Monterey Ave Edina 55416 9293110 r w Ellen Guerin 4406 West 42nd Street Edina, MN 55416 May 2, 1990 The Honorable. Frederick S. Richards Mayor of Edina City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Re: Sidewalk on West 42nd Street Dear Mayor Richards: Last week, Morningside residents received written notice of the May 7, 1990 City Council meeting on the above - referenced issue. We also noted that the City published notice in the Sun - Current. We are looking forward to the May 7th meeting, at which we hope that the City Council will approve the sidewalk. However, many of the affected residents, while in favor of a sidewalk, would like that sidewalk to have the following characteristics: 1. That the sidewalk be continuous on either the north or south side of 42nd Street, rather than switching at Grimes Avenue. 2. That the sidewalk be no wider than is necessary to allow pedestrian, stroller, and bicycle /tricycle access (i.e., five feet seems too wide). 3. That no mature trees be lost as a result of the sidewalk construction. Several of us did an unofficial count and saw five trees that looked to be in the path of the proposed sidewalk site on the south side of 42nd Street between Grimes and Oakdale. In contrast, it appears that no trees would be in the path of a sidewalk on the north side of that segment, assuming that the sidewalk bypasses the telephone poles. Mayor Frederick S. Richards May 2, 1990 Page 2 We hope that you will take these concerns into account when approving the sidewalk plans. In addition, you should note that since the petition was circulated, two families have moved into houses at 4504 West 42nd Street and 4408 West 42nd Street, both of whom are in favor of the sidewalk. Sincerely, Ellen Guerin 4406 West 42nd Street EG /bjc cc: Francis Hoffman City Engineer Pat Corcoran 4109 Monterey Avenue So. � [M -�-- s ^ �, -^ ����-ft.,� %f�.•l —_ ��'� �` ° % � c. sue. -7�— �`�( Li f' % k,(-N, :-,- I ti VIC �e Uri C� Mjw Naomi Neebtel 4249 Crocker Ave Minneapolis MN 55416 -ay 3, 1990 To: Edina City Council From: Carol A. Franzen, homeowner 4225 Grimes Ave So Edina, Mi 55416 Due to a prior commitment to a Girl Scout swimming outing at Southview on the evening of 14ay 7, I am unable to attend the City Council meeting on adding sidewalk on W. 42nd Street. I wanted to express my opinion in written form. M-iile not lcon.ing forward to paying additional assessments, I feel the neighborhood, and my family in particular, would benefit form a sidewalk on w. 42nd Street. I realize that Edina has historically had a negative attitude toward placing sidewalks in new neighborhoods or adding them in established neighborhoods. The Morning side area is unique in many ways, and one of them is that many people use and value sidewalks. I was surprised by the two proposed assessment areas in the letter from Fran Hoffman. The sm.-,ller one would be more logical. TM home is included on both maps. Is it possible that the map of the larEer area was included to arouse more opposition to the project? Also the five foot sidewalk width proposed by the City is ridiculous. On Grimes, the sidewalk is 3 ft-10 in. wide. I would say that a 3y?'-4ft. width is totally adequate. Thank you for taking the time to read by letter and I hope you will consider my views when making a decision. Carol A. Franzen LKI May 2, 1990 Frances J. Hoffman, P.E. Director.of Public Works and City Engineer 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Hoffman : Thank you for your "Notice of Public Hearing. Sidewalk. Improve- ment No. S -47" which I received on April 28, 1990. I will attempt to be present at the May 7 meeting, but should my work schedule prevent me from doing so I wanted to write this letter to state my position on the plans presented. 1. I oppose in the strongest terms the "Proposed Assessment Area 1" Plan for Sidewalk Improvement No. S -47. My opposition is based upon the fact that while the sidewalk will certainly benefit those individuals on 42nd Street, it has no benefit for those of us on Morningside or in the southern half of the line dividing 42nd and Morningside. We have access to Weber Field. We have accesss to bus stops. e1' 2. I have no opposition to Proposed Assessment Area 2 since4directly assesses those properties benefiting from the assessment. It is most likely it was also many individuals in this area who made the request; therefor, it is only fair they be assessed for their request and not those of us who did not make the request and do not not benefit. 3. For the record, I think items such as sidewalks should come from the general city fund, and I find it offensive that residents of Edina must be further assessed for what I consider basic items our taxes should cover. In fact, a city such as Edina- - which we are all proud of and choose to live in and improve- - should have sidewalks in all of its neighborhoods via our taxes. I certainly realize budgetary restraints prevent this from occuring all at once; however, a 10 year plan could be developed. We certainly find the funds to subsidize a lot of other projects. In summary, I am oppossed to Proposed Assessment Area 1. I do not have any objections to Proposed Assessment Area 2 other than I think such construction should be part of basic city services and funded via general city funds. Sincerely,., rdina, Kalachnik Morningside Road MN 55416 925 -4315 '934 -4100, x209 GriVne5 CITY OF EDINA 4801 WEST 50th STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING MORNINGSIDE AREA IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENT NO. P- BA -204A T " 2 Ste. �2 010 NEW AND REPLACEMENT CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER AND NEW BITUMINOUS STREET SUR- FACING AND REPLACEMENT CONCRETE SIDE- WALK. The Edina City Council will on Monday, March 20, 1978, at 7:00 p.m. at the Edina City Ball. 4801 West 50th Street, hold a Public hearing on the necessity and feasibility of constructing the improvements indicated above. Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those properties which are considered to be benefited by the improvements. Total estimated costs, estimated City of Edina participation, total estimated amounts to be assessed and estimated costs per assessable unit of the improve- ments are as follows: ESTIMATED COSTS PER CITY OF EDINA TO BE ASSESSABLE IMPROVEMENT TOTAL PARTICIPATION ASSESSED UNIT P- BA -204A $2,625,658.57 $1, 50,856.70 $1 .87 R29.89 per assessable ft. The estimated costs above include construction of a state -aid street system in Morningside on Grimes Avenue from W. 44th Street to W. 42nd Street and on W.42nd Street from Grimes Avenue to France Avenue. This allows the City to draw state - aid funds which can be allocated to the construction project. The test estimates above reflect constructing a street system in Morningside with a unifonn width of thirty (30) feet in non- sidewalk areas north of W. 42nd Street and a street width on streets south of W. 42nd Street corresponding to the current width on each street, with replacement of sidewalk, on existing sidewalk areas. An alternate. cost estimate without use of state -aid funds will also be presented at the hearing. Other items in the cost estimates include removing elm trees on the boulevarc! and a re- forestation Program for the boulevard trees lost. There is great concern that dutch elm disease will afflict the remaining boulevard trees and as such, tree removal cost estimates are included. The City of Edina participation includes state -aid funds if a state -aid street system is constructed, community development funds, and general funds used to pay one -half ne cost of replacling curb and gutter, base and surfacing in the area presently.having c!arb and getter place. Page 2 IMPROVEMENT P- BA -204A It is proposed to assess these improvements over a 15 to 20 year period. The City's normal policy in assessing the cost of street and sidewalk improvements is to assess on the basis cf a property's frontage along the street with the frontage along the side of a corner lot divided by three to determine the assessable footage along those street::. If this project is approved, it is proposed to construct the street improvement over a two year period, 1978 and 1979. Assessment for this project would be levied in 1980 with the first payment due in 1981. The present ccndition of the Municipal Bond market makes -it difficult to determine the annual rate of interest that will be charged on the annual unpaid assessment balance, but it will not exceed seven (7) percent. Also, attached to this notice is an information sheet for property owners over 65 for whom special assessment would he a hardship. Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding these improve- ments may be forwarded to the City Council or Engineering Department prior to the hearing or presented at the hearing itself. If you desire additional infor- mation, please call me at 927 -8861 between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, 1. Francis J. Hoffman Director of Public Works. and Engineering FJH:cq ti T' CITY OF EDINA 4801 WEST 50th STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING MORNINGSIDE AREA IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENT NO. P- ST.S. -145A STnRr4 SFWFR The Edina City Council will on Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th and feasibility of constructing of this notice is an indication is among those properties which menu. 4onday, March 20, 1978, at 7:00 p.m., at the Street, hold a Public Hearing on the necessity the improvements indicated above. Your receipt that property whose ownership is listed to you are considered to be benefited by the improve- Since the last hearing, we have re- examined the proposals for storm sewer work and propose that a storm sewer improvement be completed prior to construction of a permanent street surface. 'We are proposing wh t we consider to be minin"uri storm sewer extensions on Grimes Avenue from Morniegside Road to Branson Street, _ on 1lorninaside Road from Grimes tc Crocker. Avenue; on-Crocker Avenue between Morninaside Road and 14. 42nd Street and on Lynn Avenue from 14. 42nd Street to LittelJStreet. The storm sewer cost is proposed to be assessed uniformly over the total drainage area. j' ESTIMATED COST v CITY OF EDINA IMPROVEMENT TOTAL PARTICIPATION P- ST.S -145A $133,313.68 $9,316.72 PER TO BE ASSESSABLE ASSESSED UNIT $123,996.96 20.74 /per 1000 sq. ft. If this project is approved, it is proposed to construct the storm sewer during 1978. Assessment for this project will be levied in 1979 with the first payment due in 1980. (The present condition of the Municipal Bond market makes it diffi- cult to determine the annual rate of interest that will be charged on the annual unpaid assessment balance, but it will not exceed seven (7) percent.) Any inquiries, comments and ;'or suggestions you may have regarding these improve- ments may be forwarded to the City Council or the Engineering Department prior to the hearing or presented at the hearing itseif. If you desire additional information., please call me at 92? -8861, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Francis J. Hoffman Director r* Public l,:orks and Engineering FJH:cq IJ CITY OTF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ON WATEIC-AIN, NO. 299 Notice is hereby given that the Edina City Cowicil will meet at the City Hall at 4801 West 50th Street, Fdira, Minnesota, on August 21, 1978,, at 7:00 p.m. to hear, consider., and pass upon all objections, both oral and written, "to a proposed special assessment for the following, improvement: CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAI ?d. NO. 299 Morningside Area The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Lot 11, Auditor's Subdivision tt172; Lot 8, Auditor's Subdivision #319; Lot 2, White Oaks 3rd; Parcels 1100, 200n, and 5000, Sec. 7, TV p. 28, Ran c 24; Lots 1 thru 12, Block 1, A and B Addition; Lots 1 thru 3, Block 1, and Lots 1 thru 5, Block 2, Arden Park; Lots 3, 4, 5(also Lot 9, Block 2, Arden Park), 6 (also Lot 8, BlocK.2, Arden Park), Lots 7 thru 31, Lots 33, 35 thru 41, 43 thru 52; Auditor's Subdivision 161; Lots 1 thru 12, Block 1, and Lots 1 thru 7, Block 2, Berkeley Heights; Lots 1 thru 26, Block 1, and Lots 1 thru 26, Block 2, and Lots 8 thru 14, 17 thru 19, Block 3, Crocker s Crowell's First; Lots 2 thru 9, Block 1, and Lots l thru 9, Block 2, Fairbairnes Rearrangement in Waveland & Waveland Park; Lots 1 thru 16, Melvin Grimes Subdivision of Lets 8, 9, and 10 Grimes Homestead; Lots 1 thru 3, Leerskovs First; Lots 1 thru 3, Block 1, Mac Gregors; Lots 1 thru 8, Block 1, and Lots 1 (also Lot 1 and 2, Wooddale Heights 2nd) thru 12, Block 2 Michelson's Rearrangement of Morningside; Lots.l thru 10, 12 and 13, Block 1, and Lots 1 thru 19, and 22 thru 26, Block 2, and Lots 1 thru 12, Block 3, Mini - khada Vista Third; Lots 14 thru 95, Morningside; Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, and Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Morningside Manor; Lots 1 thru 3, and 8 thru 11, Block 1, and Lots 1 thru 9, Block 2, and Lots 1 thru 9, Block 3, Morningside Oaks; Tract A, Registered Land Survey #517; Tracts A thru D, Registered Land Survey 4549; Tract A, Registered Land Survey #567; Tracts A thru E, Registered Land Survey #650; Lots l thru 27, Riley's Subdivision of Lots 3 thru 7, 30 & 31, Grimes Homestead; Lots 1 thru 15 and 20, William Scotts; Lots 1 thru 4, Block 1, William Scotts Addition - Peterson Replat; Blocks 13 and 15, Waveland Park; Lots 1 thru 10, Block 1, and Lots 1 thru 7, Block 2, Wooddale Heights; Lots 1 thru 5, Wooddale Heights Second; Lots 1, 2, 11 thru 13, 15 thru 18, 24 thru 29, Grimes Homestead. ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT - $458.65 PER ASSESSABLE CONNECTION PROPOSED ASSESSMENT - $534.18 PER ASSESSABLE CONNECTION The proposed assessment roll is now on file in the office of the City Clerk and is open to public inspection. The proposed assessment will be payable in ten (10) equal installments over a period of ten years. First payment of each assessment will be payable together with real estate taxes payable in 1979, with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 5% per annum from the date of the resolution adopting the assessment to December 31, 1979. To each subsequent installment will be added interest at the same rate for one year on all unpaid installments. The owner of any property assessed may pay the whole of the assess- ment, ti•:ithout interest, to the City Treasurer on or before November 15, 1978. 140 PURT11FR STATEMIENT L•]ILL BE IS.E:UZED. 'Pioposed Special Psssessmcnt oni Watclmal'I'I No. 299' Page 2 Any o•.:j-,a:: rav lu-hc assessment to the district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Scctin.,-i 429.0,21, serving notice of t1le app•al upon the Maycr or Clerk o- th - C-it-:j- cf E­di.;,._­. 41-.,..entv (,0) bays after thc, adoption of thr- assessincnt tho C-Lu".., Council, and b­ filinc z. stick notice with'the district court Within to (1011 itftcr sv_-1r%F1Ce U.17011 17.he Mlavor or Clerk. Pursuant to Vinne7ota Statutes, the City of Edina has adopted standards and guidelines fcr 6e:'. -rrine1 . special assessment s again -t homestead property o-,.-ned ()4� acre ol- oldar for pa-ment would be a hardshiz'. To by persons 65 vec� ... _ - .1 - obtain 6efe:C1!LC'11t,. must be filed with til­e City Assessor's affict_- by the. closet of busin.-t-ss on the laZt busincss day before the Cit Council meeting set out in the first paragrap-i -of this notice. For further information, and application forms, please call or visit the City Assessor's office. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL. July 21, 1938 Florence B. Hallberg City Clerk CITY OF EDINA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 ATTENTION: PROPERTY (ANERS OVER 65 FOR WHOM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT WOULD BE A HARDSHIP SENIOR CITIZEN SPECIAL ASSESS14FNT DEFERMENTS It is now possible for residents of Edina who are over 65 years of age and for whom payment of special assessments against homestead property would be a hardship to apply to have assessments deferred if they meet the following qualifications: 1. The applicant must be 65 years of age or older, 2. The applicant must own the property for which the deferment is requested, either alone or in joint tenancy with a spouse, who also lives with the applicant in the same property, but who need not be 65 years of age or older, 3. The property for which deferment is requested must be classified and taxed as homestead property by the City Assessor as of the date the application is made, and 4. The applicant must have a "financial hardship" as defined as: a. an income of $15,000 or less in the calendar year.prior to the year in which the assessment will be levied (as given in the Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 290A "Property Tax Refund" application) and b. the first year's installment of the proposed special assessment will increase-the aggregate total of the installments of special assess- ments against the property for which deferment is requested and pay- able in the year of the first installment to a sum equal to more than 2% of this income. If you wish to apply for this deferment, or have further questions, please write or call the Assessor's Office, City Hall, 927 -8861. To obtain deferment, application must be filed with the City Assessor's Office by the close of business on the last business day before the City Council meeting set forth in the enclosed special assessment hearing notice. 4211 Alden Drive 4245 Alden Drive 4247 Alden Drive 4231 Alden Drive 4225 Crocker Avenue TELEPHONE CALLS Opposed. Herb Knox - opposed. Opposed. Opposed. If it passes, she will move. Mr. & Mrs. Karl Sharp said do not want sidewalk on 42nd Street. 4102 Grimes Avenue Sandy Eicher said is in favor of 42nd Street sidewalk. Also, want walk along Grimes. She will be at the meeting. Also wanted traffic counts. 4011 Kipling Avenue Mrs. Rose - opposed. Was asked if she opposes sidewalk on West 42nd St. during petition - misleading. 4018 Kipling Avenue W. J. Anderl - opposed. Wants name off petition was told no assessment. 4237•Lynn Avenue Conrad Razidlo said is for sidewalk, as long as the assessment is done right. 4201 Oakdale Avenue Agatha Ledin Opposed. 4211 Scott Terrace Mary Farr said she does not want sidewalk. 4242 Scott Terrace Opposed. 4201 W. 42nd Street They are opposed but want it on the North side. They have the large cottonwood tree. 4217 W. 42nd Street Richard King'- Opposed. Has two boulevard Elms which would have to be removed. PETITION OPPOSING SIDEWALK AND ASSESSMENT WEST 42ND STREET EDINA We, the undersigned property owners, hereby indicate our opposition to the proposed construction of a sidewalk along West 42nd St., Edina, and the assessment therefor. This sidewalk is unnecessary and will not benefit our property. 4 tir �� Ox A PETITION OPPOSING SIDEWALK s AND ASSESSMENT WEST 42ND STREET EDINA We, the undersigned property owners, hereby indicate our opposition to the proposed construction of a sidewalk along West 42nd St., Edina, and the assessment therefor. This sidewalk is unnecessary and will not benefit our property. SIGNATURE OF OWNERS ADDRESS PETITION IN OPPOSITION TO IMPROVEMENT NO S-47 TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL: WE THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY 'TATE OUR OPPOSITION TO ANY ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF A SIDEWALK--,'WEST 42 ND ST BETWEEN OAKDALE ST AND FRANCE AVE IN THE CITY OF EDINA. S- OWNER, ADDRES& -z aL f 7i jTtz ^� PETITION IN OPPOSITION TO IMPROVEMENT NO S-47 TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL: WE THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY STATE OUR OPPOSITION TO ANY ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF A SIDEWALK WEST 42 ND ST BETWEEN OAKDALE ST AND FRANCE AVE IN THE CITY OF EDINA' -------------------------- _------------------------------------ __ SAGNATURE OF OWNER ADDRESS Yool ' - ______________»~���_�+��+"��^~.~�______^__ � ^~-------------------------------------- -------------- ' ------------------ ------------- ' 4L L�,` -- «�--------------_�/.T_' ������ ^-1 PETITION IN OPPOSITION TO IMPROVEMENT NO S-47 TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL: WE THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY STATE OUR OPPOSITION TO ANY ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF A SIDEWALK WEST 42 ND ST BETWEEN OAKDALE ST AND FRANCE AVE IN THE CITY OF EDINA. 'SIGNATURE OF OWNER ADDRESS -------------------------- _ _ _ _________________ - �-�___�______________��-��' // x _ � '7'o/�� .2������__ . . _ cwj_�, L/L} / 9 � ____________ ~ 4�n^w --�r-----�---------------------------------^--------------------- ^~ ' ___---- ____________ ' � . PETITION lN OPPOSITION TO IMPROVEMENT NO 9-47 TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL: WE THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY STATE OUR OPPOSITION TO ANY ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF A SIDEWALK WEST 42 NO BT BETWEEN WAKDALE ST AND FRANCE AVE IN THE CITY OF EDINA' ' --______________________________________________________--___�___ SIGNATURE OF OWNER ADDRESS ' _-________________________________-________ __-___ _ \ _-_______z __________1����_�. � `— PETITION IN OPPOSITION TO IMPROVEMENT NO B-47 TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL: WE THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY STATE OUR OPPOSITION TO ANY ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF A SIDEWALK WEST 42 ND ST BETWEEN OAKDALE ST AND FRANCE AVE IN THE CITY OF EDINA. SIGNATURE OF OWNER ADDRESS ----------------------------------------------------- I IL ;&i ................................ oll � / �-OL PETITION IN OPPOSITION TO IMPROVEMENT NO S-47 TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL: WE THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY STATE OUR OPPOSITION TO ANY ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF A SIDEWALK WEST 42 ND ST BETWEEN OAKDALE ST AND FRANCE AVE IN THE CITY OF EDINA. SIGNATURE OF OWNER ADDRESS --------�-----71--- ____-__ r' ---------�- ------------------------ ------ ----- �_____--- ------------------------- � J _ _- _ P_i8 _ _7D - � / . _ /J cc / / | .� Ile- �- it) AGENDA ITEM III.A vu- V6 H`fc� �C�°c2' ✓rte (See a...r,e Side) t+-x.. c�t 4 4 w �{ 2"`� st i13p5 ._N3U4 PETITION OPPOSING SIDEWALK AND ASSESSMENT t WEST 42ND STREET EDINA We, the undersigned property owners,, hereby indicate our oppositian to the proposed construction of a sidewalk along West 42nd St., Edina, and the assessment therefor. This sidewalk is unnecessary and will not benefit our property. SIGNAURE OF OWNERS ADDRESS --r f-.e ,,. -ZZT7 A- v" \ 01 Cn O REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To. Mayor & City Council) Agenda Item # 111.B. From. Francis Hoffman/ j �(` Consent ❑ City Engineer Information Only ❑ Date. 7 May, 1990 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject. W. 69th Street 0 To Council Public Hearing. Action Fx-1 Motion Reconstruction from France to Xerxes ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Continue to May 21st Council Meeting. Info/Background- Staff has prepared plans for reconstruction of West 69th Street from France Avenue to Xerxes Avenue. These plans are consistent with the expansion of the Galleria block. However, staff needs to review these plans with Southdale Shopping Center as to access changes further prior.to any Council action. We, therefore, recommend continuing this matter to the May 21st, 1990 Council meeting. A. e F . Iry �O • , Z0RPow -w • lase REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland From: Craig Larsen Date: May 7, 1990 Subject: Licensing Ordinance for Commercial Parking Lots. Recommendation : - Discussion. INFO /BACKGROUND Agenda Item # IV. B. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution 0 Ordinance ❑ Discussion Attached is a first draft of a.parking lot licensing ordinance. The ordinance requires a license for lots which restrict access for whatever reason. Key requirements of the ordinance are: 1. Formal application process including application fee. 2. Yearly operating fee for a restricted access lot. 3. Review of application by Director of Public Works. 4. Requirement for liability insurance. S. Inspections authorized and revocation of license if Ordinance violations are found. 6. Signage, landscaping and other performance requirements. The ordinance closely follows the City of Minneapolis licensing ordinance. At this point the ordinance has not been reviewed by the City Attorney. If the Council wishes to proceed to adoption of a licensing ordinance, I would suggest it be referred to staff and the City Attorney for necessary corrections and revisions. N ORDINANCE NO. 824 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A LICENSING PROCEDURE FOR RESTRICTED ACCESS PARKING LOTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Definitions. "Restricted Access Parking Lot" means a parking lot which by mechanical or other means controls access to a privately owned parking lot structure. "Free Parking Lot" means a parking lot for which access and egress is unrestricted and which is operated for the benefit of persons such as, but not limited to, employees, members, customers, patrons, clients or visitors. "Motor Vehicle" means every vehicle which is self - propelled and not deriving its power from overhead wires. "Motor Vehicle Reservoir Area" means the area at the entrance of a commercial parking lot between the property line and the line at which a ticket or claim check is received or a fee is paid. "Parking Lot: means any open air space with ten (10) or more parking spaces used for the parking or storing of motor vehicles. License Required. No person shall own or operate or in any way offer to operate a restricted access parking lot without first obtaining a license for that lot as provided in this chapter. Application for License. Any person desiring to be licensed to own or operate a restricted access parking lot shall file an application with the City Clerk on forms provided by the Clerk. The application shall contain such information as the Clerk may require, including plot plans and the street address of the applicant's residence, the name of the owner of the lot and the name of the manager or operator of the lot if different than the owner. No application shall be considered completed unless plot plans have been approved by the Department of Public Works with regards to all requirements of this ordinance. Procedure. Prior to the issuance of a license, the Director of Public Works shall determine if the parking lot complies with all the provisions of this chapter, other applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, and state statutes and regulations. If all such provisions are met and proper application has been made, the Fire and Police may grant the license. License Fee. There shall be an original license fee of $500.00 for all restricted access parking lots, payable with the original application. Thereafter, annual license fees shall be: 0 -50 spaces $100.00 51 -100 spaces $150.00 101 -200 spaces $250.00 Over 200 spaces $400.00 Expiration Date. All restricted access parking lot licenses issued under this chapter shall expire on September 1st of each year. Transfer of Licenses. No license issued under this chapter shall be transferable except upon application in the same manner as for a new lot, and approved by the City Council. Insurance Required. Each applicant for a license under this chapter at all times shall keep in full force and effect a public liability insurance policy written by an insurance company authorized to do business in this state, in the following amounts: Not less than five thousand dollars ($5,000) property damage; twenty -five thousand dollars ($25,000) for injury or death of one person; and fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) for each occurrence. A copy of the policy or certificate of insurance shall be filed with the City Clerk. The policy or certificate shall contain an endorsement as provided by section of this Code of Ordinances. No cancellation of any insurance policy shall be valid except upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City Clerk. Revocation Suspension, Refusal to Renew. A license granted under this chapter may be revoked, suspended or not renewed by the City Council for good cause. Violations of any of the terms of this chapter shall be cause for revocation, suspension, or refusal to renew a license. Inspections Required: Notice, Correction of Violations. (a) At such times as de, shall inspect every event a parking lot provisions pursuant personally upon the residential address timed necessary, the Department of Public Works parking lot located within the City. In the is found not in compliance with any of the to this chapter a written notice shall be served licensee of such parking lot or by mail at the as appearing on the license application. (b) The written notice shall describe the violation and shall be signed by the Director of Public Works. The notice shall require the licensee to correct the listed violations within thirty (30) days after date of service of such notice or to show cause why such license should not be revoked at the next meeting of the appropriate City Council committee following the thirty (30) day period. The notice shall contain a return to be signed by the server thereof attesting the manner in which the notice was served. Paying Required. (a) The ground floor space of all parking lots shall be surfaced with concrete of either the cement of asphalt type. (b) The ground or floor surface of all parking lots shall be maintained so as to provide a smooth, level surface for parking and shall be kept free of depressions, cracks, gaps, holes, and similar surface aberrations, as well as dust, rocks, dirt and other debris. Driveways. All driveway locations, the width of driveways, location of self- service ticket vendors, location of attendant buildings and the interior circulation systems shall be approved by the Department of Public Works. Drainage. All parking lots shall be constructed with a drainage system adequate to prevent the free flow of water into the sidewalk or into properties adjacent to the parking lot. Motor Vehicle Reservoir. A commercial parking lot shall have a motor vehicle reservoir area at each entrance. The motor vehicle reservoir area for a restricted access parking lot with a vehicle capacity of fifty (50) or less motor vehicles shall have at least three (3) eight and one half (8 1/2) foot by twenty (20) foot spaces. The motor vehicle reservoir area shall be conspicuously outlined with pavement paint and shall not be used for the parking or storage of motor vehicles. Placement of Cars. No car shall be parked in a manner which blocks any fire escape or exit door of any building adjoining the parking lot. In no case shall cars be parked in a manner that would prevent reclamation of any car upon request. At no time shall any driver with a current claim check be refused the opportunity to obtain his car, provided the driver has paid accumulated parking charges. Claim Check. When a car is left for parking in an attended Class "A" commercial parking lot, the driver shall be furnished with a claim check on which shall be printed the full name of the operator and the address of the parking lot. Parking Spaces and Aisles. All parking lots shall have conspicuously marked spaces which shall open directly upon an aisle of such width and design as approved by the City Engineer. Landscaping, Fencing, and Bumper Curbs. (a) All parking lots shall be landscaped. The landscaping requirement shall be pursuant to Zoning Ordinance regulations. Attendant Buildings. Attendant buildings shall be accessible to all _reservoir areas and located no closer than feet from the sidewalk adjacent to any entrance to any entrance or exit. Minimum standards for the materials and general design of attendant buildings shall be as- follows: (a) Attendant building shall have a minimum floor area sufficient to accommodate the normally complement of station operating personnel. The building shall be enclosed and weathertight. It shall be equipped with an operable and lockable door and window. It shall be set on a curb or platform rising a minimum of six (6) inches above the adjacent lot paving. Service connections.shall be in accordance with this Code. (b) Materials of construction shall be compatible with the screening design and should respect the character of the surrounding neighborhood. Materials used in construction shall be of a permanent nature such as brick, stone, concrete, wood, terra - cotta, prefinished metal, tile and other similar materials. (c) All building plans shall be submitted to the Department of Inspections for approval so as to insure their compliance with all building codes. A building permit shall be required for construction of said building. Lighting. Parking lots which are equipped with lights shall have such lights arranged in a manner so that residential structures shall be shielded from direct rays of light and so as not to exceed an intensity of illumination greater than three (3) footcandles measured at the residence district boundary, or ten (10) footcandles measures at the contiguous street right -of -way line. (a) Every Restricted Access Parking Lot license shall maintain information signs on the parking lot. Said signs shall show the name and telephone number of licensee or attendant, the licensee's number under which he is operating, and the rates charged for parking or storing automobiles on said premises. Such signs shall state the minimum rate, the maximum rate for 12 hours and the maximum rate for 24 hours, and if there is no maximum rate, the sign shall so indicate. No change in the posted rates shall be effective until notice of such change has been given not less than 24 hours prior to the effective time of the change in schedule by posting the same on the premises. Signs shall be two feet by three feet, permanently mounted with a minimum height to the bottom of sign of four feet and a maximum height to top of sign of eight feet, and shall conform to all City codes regarding erection and construction. Layout of sign graphics shall be according the the approved prototypes as approved by the City Council on file with the Department of Inspections which establishes the standards pertaining to size of sign, color, size of lettering, placement of information and identification symbols. In no case shall any letters or numerals be less than two inches in height. (b) Signs on one -way streets need only display required graphics on the side facing traffic flow. In such cases the opposite face shall be painted white. (c) Except as permitted in this section, it' shall be unlawful to attach signs to or display graphics of any type on licensed attendant building except to attach or incorporate into the building design a sign which specifies the hours of attendant duty, the location of keys after attendant house, the name and phone number of licensee, and any other information essential to the normal operation of the lot. (d) All parking lots which engage in towing of unauthorized vehicles shall post such practice on a sign at each lot entrance, or on an information sign, or on the outside of an attendant building. In addition, the sign shall include the lots owner's name, license or permit number, name and telephone number of tower used. Letters on such signs shall be at least one (1) inch in height. Charges Limited to Those On Sign, Maximum Lost Ticket Charge. No parking lot shall charge any greater sum for parking a motor vehicle than is provided for on the entrance signs. No parking lot shall charge a lost ticket charge greater than the maximum rate for each 24 hour period in which a car was actually parked in the lot. Alterations. ` It shall be unlawful for any parking lot operator to make any alterations in the approved plot plan layout pertaining to entrance and exit location; width and grade; design and location of attendant building; landscaping area or screening; location of signs; location of lighting; without first securing the approval of the Department of Public Work. Maintenance. No licensee, or other person in charge of any parking lot shall place upon the street, alley, curb, sidewalk or boulevard, any accumulations of snow, ice, dirt, rubbish or other dangerous or unwholesome substances or of any water or waste by reasons of washing or cleaning or automobiles; and each licensee shall at all times keep all driveways leading to said parking lot and sidewalks and backyards adjacent to said parking lot free and clear of all accumulations of show, ice, dirt, weeds, rubbish, or other dangerous or unwholesome substances. All snow originating in entrances or upon the lot itself shall be hauled away at the lot owner's or operator's expense or placed well back on private property. Each licensee shall at all times keep all surface areas of said parking lot free and clear of all accumulations of dirt, weeds, rubbish, or other dangerous or unwholesome substances. Attendant buildings, landscaping, fences, walls, planters, and shrubbery shall be kept clean and in good condition at all times. Trees, plants, and grass shall be well tended and shall be replaced without delay if damaged, diseased, or dead. All surfaces required to be paved shall be maintained with a smooth level surface and shall be „kept free to depressions, cracks, gaps,'holes, or similar surface aberrations. Unauthorized Use of Vehicles. No parking lot personnel shall use or permit the. use of any motor vehicle left for parking for any purpose whatsoever unless authorized in writing by the owner or operator of such vehicle. Transferring Vehicle to Another Lot. No parking lot personnel shall transfer any vehicle to another parking lot without the consent of the owner or person in charge of said vehicle unless such vehicle is parking without permission or payment. Reports to Police. Each licensee shall immediately report to the Police Department the license number and make of the motor vehicle parking in the lot for a period longer than 48 hours after the termination of the parking agreement. no vehicle shall be reported more than once on any consecutive stay. Every licensee shall notify the Police Department within 24 hours of any claim made by reason of any loss of theft occurring upon the licensed premises. Prohibited Acts. (a) The licensee of a parking lot shall not permit the repairing except in an emergency, dismantling or wrecking of any motor vehicle or the storage of any junk motor vehicle on the parking lot. (b) No person shall charge, or offer'to charge, a fee for parking on any property other than a properly licensed commercial parking lot. First Reading: Second Reading: Published in the, Edina Sun - Current on /s/ FREDERICK S. RICHARDS Mayor ATTEST: /s/ MARCELLA M. DAEHN City Clerk vA. ot e P >4 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland From: Craig Larsen Date: May 5, 1990 Subject: LD -90 -5 , Lots 11,12 and 13, Country Club Fairway Addition Agenda Item # iv. c. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Approval of Lot Division subject to: 1. Lot width variance for vacant parcel; 2. Removal of existing driveway and construction of new two car garage for existing dwelling. INFO /BACKGROUND The proposed lot division comes as a result of variance hearing. A variance request was made lot which along with two adjacent 50 foot lots site. The proposed lot division would provide existing dwelling and a 70 foot wide lot for a below the minimum width of 75 feet development lot width variance. suggestions made at a recent to build on a vacant 50 foot wide is developed as a single home an 80 foot wide lot for the new home. Since the new lot is of the lot would be subject to a Attached to this report is the proposed footprint of the new home. The graphic is provided for information only. If the lot division is approved by the Council the Board of Appeals will consider the variance at its May 17, meeting. Lot divisions are not considered public hearings and, as such, no publication or mailed notices are required. However, since the lot division and variance would result in the construction of a new dwelling we have mailed notice of the lot division hearing to all neighbors who received notice of the variance request. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the variance, subject to the conditions mentioned above, at its May 2, 1990, meeting. DRAFT MINUTES P. C. MEETING MAY 2, 1990 LD -90 -5 Paul Curran and Patricia Curran 4209 County Club Road Lots 11 -13, Block 14 Country Club District Fairway Request: A proposal to divide the middle lot of three 50 foot wide platted lot's currently held in common ownership. The resulting parcels will measure 80 feet and 70 feet wide respectively. Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the subject property currently is comprised of three 50' X 135' platted lots. The single family home known as 4209 Country Club Road is built on the most westerly lot (Lot 13) and a portion of the middle lot (lot 12). The remaining portion of lot 12 is occupied by the driveway for the home. Lot 11, the easterly lot, has on it an old tennis court. Mr. Larsen explained that on March 15, 1990, the proponents sought lot width and lot area variances from the Board of Appeals and Adjustments,in order to build a new home in place of the tennis court on Lot 11. The Board of Appeals reviewed the request and heard testimony from neighbors. At the Board of Appeals Meeting the Board noted that they were not comfortable with a constructing a home on a 50 foot lot. The Board suggested that the proponent seek ways of increasing the width and area of the lot. Mr. Larsen pointed out,the current request proposes that the easterly 20 feet of Lot 12 be combined with Lot 11. The result is a 70' X 136' parcel with an area of 9,400 square feet. The remaining parcel on which the existing home will remain will include the westerly 30' of Lot 12 and all of Lot 13. The parcel will measure 80' X 135' with an area of 10,800 square feet. Continuing, Mr. Larsen reported that along Country Club Road between Wooddale and Bruce five other homes face Country Club Road besides the parcels in question. The widths of these lots are as follows: 100', 70', 80', 100', and 97'. North of the subject property the lots on-Drexel and Casco are 50' and 60' wide lots. Mr. Larsen concluded that the lot division as proposed creates two parcels similar in size and character to those in the area. Staff recommends approval of the request with the following conditions: 1. Maintenance of a two car garage with the existing house and driveway easements as necessary. 2. Lot width variance approval for the easterly parcel. The proponent, Mr. Curran was present. Chairman G. Johnson explained to the Board that he, Helen McClelland, and Geof Workinger were members present at the Board of Appeals Meeting that asked the Currans to work with Mrs. Vennum to create a lot that is compatible in size with the lots in the immediate neighborhood. Mr. Curran told the Commission at the request of the Board he worked with Mrs. Vennum and came up with the present solution he hopes will be favorable to the Commission. He added it is proposed that Mrs. Vennum's tuck - under /below grade garage will be filled in, the present driveway removed and a new two car detached garage constructed in the rear, of the property. Mr. Curran said the driveways for the Vennum property and the proposed property will be located on the east side. Commissioner Ingwalson asked.Mr. Larsen to clarify for him the need for the variance if the lot division is approved. Mr. Larsen explained that if the proposed lot division is approved this evening, a lot width variance will still be needed because of our Zoning Ordinance. Our Zoning Ordinance requires that all lots have -a minimum lot width of 75 feet. Mr. Larsen said he can understand confusion, because a majority of lots within the Country Club area are below the 75 foot lot width requirement. Continuing, Mr. Larsen said if approved, the Currans would be applying for a five foot lot width variance. Mr. Larsen pointed out this process also affords staff and board members control over what is constructed. Commissioner McClelland commented that the plan as it has been presented followed the boards suggestion to increase the lot size from the previous proposal, which was to develop on a 50 foot lot. Commissioner McClelland added this proposal works much better, and in her opinion, the Vennum property will be improved with the tuck under garage filled in. She added at times that garage has had water run -off problems. Commissioner Hale asked if the proposed new house would have a two car garage constructed in the rear. Mr. Curran answered that is correct, the new lot will have the garage constructed in the rear. Commissioner L. Johnson said he wants to make sure each property is developed with a separate garage, separate driveway and that Mr. Vennum's tuck under garage is eliminated. Mr. Larsen said that issue could also be solved by the variance board when the variance request is heard. Chairman G. Johnson suggested that if this proposal is approved, the lot width variance should be heard by the Board that heard this issue previously. Commissioner L. Johnson moved to recommend approval of the lot division subject to staff conditions and the further recommendation that Tract A be developed with a separate two car garage located in the rear, with a separate driveway and that the present tuck under garage be eliminated and properly filled, and Tract B be developed with a separate two car garage and separate driveway. Commissioner Hale seconded the motion. Ayes; Hale, Faust, L. Johnson, McClelland, Runyan, Palmer, Ingwalson, Byron, G. Johnson. Nays; Workinger. Commissioner Workinger explained he voted Nay because he felt the motion was too restrictive and the garage /driveway issues could be addressed and implemented on the Board level. •I•gAIN d [•l ILI M ;T, I.r � a �� �9 "rte" Isis MEN ion as � ss�ME Mrs w �iit��s�w NOW; I 'I • a 111 ® IC MW to SWIMMP gamma IRS -'s �' ►sty,. _99'"�I4�'��i�`'�� •- �.- � �raM ��� ��ses mom EDINA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MAY 2, 1990 LD -90 -5 Paul Curran and Patricia Curran 4209 County Club Road Lots 11 -13, Block 14 Country .Club District Fairway Request: A proposal to divide the middle lot of three 50 foot wide platted lots currently held in common ownership. The resulting parcels will measure 80 feet and 70 feet wide respectively. The subject property currently is comprised of three 50' X 135' platted lots. The single family home known as 4209 Country Club Road is built on the most westerly lot (Lot 13) and a portion of the middle lot (lot 12). The remaining portion of lot 12 is occupied by the driveway for the home. Lot 11, the easterly lot, has on it an old.tennis court: On March 15, 1990, the proponents sought lot width and lot area variances from the Board of Appeals and Adjustments in order to build a new home in place of the tennis court on Lot 11. The Board of Appeals reviewed the request and heard testimony from neighbors. The attached Board of Appeals minutes reflect that the Board was not comfortable with a home on a 50 foot lot. The Board suggested that the proponent seek ways of increasing the width and area of the lot. The current request proposes that the easterly 20 feet of Lot 12 be combined with Lot 11. The result is a 70' X 136' parcel with an area of 9,400 square feet. The remaining parcel on which the existing home will remain will include the westerly 30' of Lot 12 and all of Lot 13. The parcel will measure 80' X 135' with an area of 10,800 square feet. Along Country Club Road between Wooddale and Bruce five other homes face Country Club Road besides the parcels in question. The widths of these lots are as follows: 100', 70', 80', 100', and 97'. North of the subject property the lots on Drexel and Casco are 50' and 60' wide lots. Recommendation: The lot division as proposed creates two parcels similar in size and character to those in the area. Staff recommends approval of the request with the following conditions: 1. Maintenance of a two car garage with the existing house and driveway easements as necessary. 2. Lot width variance approval for the easterly parcel. �NrlinG • C 'WAIk. �►: ?9.86 — �2, y 26 L =56.50 Plat stow 1 Bak �•.:` � a N'r 192.9 I {819•° r<'( b 1 V � N N V E x i s t n 9/ 1� Si°ry Haase C N so , Teti je+J.l t t14.�. • 14.0 N %g o $S / t 4 u ♦ : 6 66.4 !.JS re��`' coo,' TRACT B M o.3 19.2 `° �P� e� +►\ .9 �ap,a AREA t 9,490 54. FT. pit 0.� M x•l1.1 c � o � " TRACT A AREA : 10A sv. Ft. M __}^^• te9.o • ��4 • 1 p °tip I Yse9 e c q _ 80.16 Oil B -90 -11 Mr. and Mrs. Paul J. Curran East 50 feet of 4209 Country Club Road Lot 11 - 13, Block 14 Country Club Fairway Section Zoning: R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District Request: A 25 foot lot width variance and a 2194 square foot lot area variance to build a new home on a 50' % 136' lot held in common with two other 50' lots, all currently known as 4209 Country Club Road Mr. Dommer informed the Board the subject property is an existing 50 foot wide platted lot. Currently, the lot is owned together with two other 50 foot lots. Along the block at the subject site the lots are platted at 50 feet in width, however, all owners on the south side of Country Club Road in this block own portions of two or more lots. Lot widths range between 70 feet and 150 feet. Mr. Dommer explained on the north side of Country Club Road in this block are corner lots. The frontage along Country Club Road of these corner lots is at least 100 feet. Beyond these corner lots to the north the district is developed with 50' - 60' wide lots. The lot size requirements applicable to this area is a minimum 9000 square foot lot area and a minimum lot width of 75 feet. Mr. Dommer added the subject property is 6806 square feet in area and 50 feet wide. Mr. Dommer told the Board the proponents desire to build a new home on the lot. Currently an old tennis court occupies the site. Architecturally the new home is proposed to be similar in character to the surrounding area. Driveway access to the property will be from Country Club Road along the neighbors driveway to the east and lead to a detached two car garage. The proposed home and garage are at the maximum lot coverage limit. Mr. Dommer pointed out the City of Edina has permitted new construction on substandard lots when the following conditions are met: other substandard lots in the area are built on; the proposed dwelling meets all applicable size and setback requirements; the proposed construction does not negatively impact adjoining properties; and, access to the site is adequate. Mr. Dommer concluded as presented, the proposal has been designed to address the above criteria. Despite the sensitive design, staff has identified the following deficiencies: 1. . Conformance with area. Staff defines the area for comparison as the streetscape along Country Club Road. Spacing along the north and south of Country Club Road is relatively generous. The proposed home disrupts this streetscape to a degree. 2. Impact on adjoining properties. The impact on the adjoining properties is difficult to predict. In this instance, the adjoining properties have enjoyed the undeveloped land for many years, and therefore, the building of a new home, even if the lot were con- forming would impact the neighbors. Because the lot is not con- forming, the spacing and open space would be less than it otherwise might be. The impact therefore would be greater than a conforming situation. 3. Adequate access. Entering from Country Club Road is certainly appropriate. In this case, however, neighboring driveways are on both sides of the property. Because of the narrow lot access to a detached garage must run adjacent to the neighbors drive and essentially be a shared driveway. Staff believes there are some positive elements to the proposal. Unfortunately, given the above deficiencies, staff cannot support the request. Mr. Dommer added should the Board feel otherwise, staff would recommend that any approval be made contingent on review and comment by the Heritage Preservation Board regarding the final building plans. This will ensure preservation of the character of the Baird House which is located south of the subject property. The proponents, Mr. and Mrs..Curran, their architect, Mr. Bartels, of BRW and interested neighbors were present. With graphics, Mr. Bartels explained to the Board the house was designed to blend into the neighborhood and maintain the character and symmetry of the surrounding homes. Mr. Bartels told the Board the house has been designed to meet the intent of the codes. Continuing, Mr. Bartels said the house has been developed according to the guidelines for a 50 foot lot. He said the house will be 2,800 square feet and the materials will be brick with other materials befitting the neighborhood. He added the house will be constructed with today's needs in mind so no future additions to the home would be necessary. Mr. Bartels pointed out the current home on the site, the Vennum home, and the property it sits on, is in a sense, out of character for the neighborhood. Mrs. McClelland asked Mr. Bartels if he knew how many feet there is between the lot line of the proposed lot and the addition of the other home. Mr. Bartels said he is guessing that the distance is around 40 feet. Mr. G. Johnson asked if there is going to be any separation between the two driveways. Mrs. Bartels said there will be no separation between the driveways. Mr. L. Johnson pointed out that the driveways could be separated. Mr. Johnson questioned that if there is 40 feet between the houses on the west side why isn't the new lot line shifted toward the west. Mr. Bartels said the reason is because of the shared recessed driveway. Mr. Bartels said that visually from the street there will be a wide separation because of this driveway. Mrs. McClelland said she feels this proposal is not appropriate. She pointed out there is additional room because of the size of the lot to creatively place the proposed structure without.such a negative impact to the surrounding neighbors. Mrs. McClelland concluded that she cannot support the proposal as presented when there are other alternatives that can be studied. Mrs. Amondt, 4203 Country Club Road told the Board she has no objection to the style of the home but wants it constructed on a lot larger than 50 feet in width. She said the neighborhood in question contains lots that are larger than 50 feet and added she feels there is room for creativity of house in placement in this area. Mrs. Amondt pointed out she has a fear that there could be another home placed on the site if a 50 foot wide lot is approved by this Board. Mr. Newhall, Mrs. Vennum's brother, 1904 James Avenue South, told the Board he is in favor of granting this variance. He added the 50 foot requirement is adequate. He pointed out the additional house will not give the block a "crowded" look and added he feels the plans presented will give the neighborhood an opportunity to have an appropriate house constructed on the site. Ms. Elizabeth Johnson, 4215 Country Club Road, said she opposes the current plan because most of the houses along the street are larger than the house proposed, she added she has a concern about possible additions to the home. Ms. Johnson also expressed concern over the rest of the remaining property as time goes on. She does not want to see more development along Country Club Road, because it will change the character of the streetscape. Ms. Butler, 4634 Bruce Avenue told the Board she has a concern regarding approving the development of a 50 foot lot and the implications of a possible precedent being set. Mr. Jack Curtis, 4400 West 50th Street (Baird House), told the Board this issue could be resolved if the Vennums would wall in the underground garage, fill in the hole, construct a new garage in the rear of the lot and properly position the proponents garage. If that is accomplished it will be possible to get two 75 foot lots, or very close to two 75 foot lots which will create a more open feeling. Continuing, Mr. Curtis proposed that the shared driveway could then be placed on Vennums side with the construction fill from the Curran's construction of their new house used to fill in the garage /driveway hole on Mrs. Vennum's property. Mr. Curtis added this concept would make Vennums property more desirable because she will have a new garage that will be much easier to access. Mr. Johnson said that is not the proposal before the Board this evening, but it is an interesting solution.- He explained to Mr.. Curtis that the Board can only vote on what is presented. Mr. Curran said he recently discovered the concern of the neighbors in the area to this proposal. Mr. Curran said he is willing to buy more property so another site could not be developed. Mr. Johnson said if additional property is purchased it could create an irregular lot if not properly done, which the Board would not support. Mr. Curran said Mrs. Vennum would have to be approached regarding the suggestion made by Mr. Curtis and that he and his family would want time think of the implications if they change their plan. Mr. Johnson said with what he has viewed in driving by and studying the area, the best solution to this proposal is the one suggested by Mr. Curtis. Mr. Johnson said at this time he cannot support what is proposed. Mrs. McClelland agreed with Mr. Johnsons observation. She added impinging on the neighbor to the east is not being a good neighbor, when there is adequate spacing on the other side. She pointed out obtaining more property, thereby creating a 70 or 80 foot lot would be a reasonable, workable solution and provide more spacing between houses. Mrs. McClelland said supporting the proposal would set a precedent for 50 foot lots. Mr. Newhall said what has been suggested by Mr. Curtis has merit. He added what would the Board recommend them doing at this time. Mr. Johnson explained to Mr. Curran and Mr. Newhall that members of this Board have indicated that they cannot support the variance as presented. Mr. Johnson said that if you want the Board to consider what Mr. Curtis has suggested your request would have to be withdrawn. Mr. Johnson added that if a revision is made to the proposal the Currans should work with staff and request that the same Board present this evening hear the revised proposal. Mr. Johnson added that if the proponent wishes the Board to vote this evening, and if it is denied, you do have the right to appeal our decision to the Council. Mr.. Curran said he would like to withdraw the proposal and work out a solution to the problem with the Vennums and City Staff. SITE PLAN FOR PROPOSED VARIANCE COUNTY CLUB ROAD :, e 7 Gaartlt.. !Mal'. _..... d_ 19.86 1 y��6. :.�; I •II 4k I , "., �a N _ sum -.0 Vr....'a Eli %ii As u w 6.6 ., 19.2 .s TRACT ARIA a 101 FT. - pV' - -.150.24 m"67: 160-00 Pie} LEGAL DESCRIPTION Tract H: Lot 11, end that part of Lot 12 lying easterly of the east 20.00 feet of said Lot 12, all in Block 1�, COVNTRY'CZUH DISTRICT FAIRWAY SECTION, .wording to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. ter wart �� SerwFar IOtS f •1 - -- — . emit T - LZ 64. 50 TV T I i t I I PFtO�..CD eWCrr. PPwe{t CRNP�i 1 I r �� �Q pl I I �� « 2•S•f I°3 PRoroc�D N 71p�OU 60 '�. 't I ARIA 11464 so.rk. H K lid .I - 1- 4- I NI 1 '70.08 I SITE DATA: SITE WIDTH 70 FT. SITE AREA 9490 SF. BUILDING AREA 2272 SF. SITE COVERAGE 23.9% ro 2340 Daniels Street, Long Lok Proposed Property e, Minnesota 55356 p y D Ph: 475-1433 .1 i A. o e >4, O Cn \ tiMRIBOBMS�O/ REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland From: Craig Larsen Date: May 7, 1990 Subject: Massing Recommendation: INFO /BACKGROUND Agenda Item # TV_ D. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Discussion The subject of MASSING has been reviewed in part previously in connection with the following two issues: 1. Proposed revision of setback regulations in the Fall of 1989. The focus of the discussion was on new construction. The Minneapolis Builders Association provided comment on the proposal and its effects. No action was taken. 2. Residents in the vicinity of a particular addition in the Country Club District sought review of the addition's compliance with regulations in January of 1990. The addition was found to be in compliance with City regulations and policy. Since that time, the staff was directed to review and monitor the massing issue. The following components have been reviewed and monitored. - Massing definition; - Existing method of regulation; - Massing related resident concerns; 13 - Country Club District Construction activity 1980 -1988; - Massing related action options. MASSING DEFINITION The concept of massing may mean different things to different people. Webster's Dictionary defines mass as follows: A quantity or aggregate of matter usually of considerable size. For the basis of the staff review and monitoring, this base definition has been expanded as follows: Massing refers to the mass of structures and their relation to neighboring properties in the Single Family Dwelling Unit District. EXISTING METHOD OF REGULATION Massing is currently regulated with typical bulk and density standards specified in the Zoning Ordinance no. 825. The City of Edina regulations slightly differ from some surrounding communities in specifics, but in general are similar'in concept and intent. They are as follows: Building Setbacks: The City of Edina specifies the minimum distance a building must be set back from the front lot line, the side lot lines and the rear lot line. The minimum front yard setback is 30' or the block average, if greater. The minimum rear yard setback is 25'. Setback requirements differ in the following instances: Principle v. Accessory Structures: Generally, principle structures must maintain a greater distance from side and rear lot lines than accessory structures in the side or rear yards; Wide v. Narrow Lots: The minimum side yard setback for living space on lots 75' in width or greater is ten feet whereas the minimum side yard setback for lots less than 75' wide is 5 feet. Taller Structures: As a building increases in height, the side yard setback requirement also increases at a rate of 6" for every foot the average building height exceeds 15'. Lot Coverage Requirements: The City of Edina limits the amount of the lot which one can cover with buildings. Lot coverage includes accessory . structures, decks and patios. Lot coverage requirements differ in the following instance: Large v. Small Lots: Lots which have an area of 9000 square feet or more may not cover more than 25% of the lot with the combined footprint of buildings. Lots less than 9000 square feet may not occupy more than 30% or 2,250 square feet, whichever is less. This two tier approach was established in 1984.. Previously all lots were restricted to a 25% lot coverage limit. Height: The height of single family homes may not exceed 30' or two and one half stories as measured from the front elevation. Except for increasing the side yard setback as mentioned above, there are no height restrictions in the side and rear yard. MASSING REIATED RESIDENT COMMENTS In the past year the staff has responded to comments from residents on massing. The comments can be generally classified as follows: 1.. Current massing regulations are too permissive. 2. Current massing regulations are too restrictive. Comments are as follows: Too Permissive: "The addition is too close to the side of my home / The addition is too close to my back yard / The new home towers over our home / We have lost our privacy because the large windows look right down on our patio / The new addition blocks our sunlight and views / The building is not in scale with the neighborhood / One or two such homes or' additions are o.k. but if everyone were, allowed to build or expand in a similar way the area would be overpowered /" Too Restrictive: " The existing living space is not functional for todays lifestyles / The character of this area is urban and there is a particular attraction about a "Georgetown" atmosphere / More homeowners desire to expand and upgrade their homes than not. If all were permitted to expand in a similar scale, the character would remain intact / The taxes and value of property in Edina support large, functional homes. /" The City of Edina also entertains an estimated 30 requests a year for variances from the bulk and density requirements in the Single Dwelling Unit District. COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY 1980 -1988 The Country Club District in particular has been the focus of both sides of the massing issue. In response, the staff has studied the building activity in the District between 1980 and 1988. The study included all types of permits such as interior remodeling not visible from the exterior and the addition of new living area visible from the exterior., The following summary statements can be made and are supported with the attached graphs: 1. The number of building permits of all types have fluctuated through the study period with no apparent pattern;. 2. There were more conversions and interior remodeling than there were new additions. 3. The value of all types of permits has increased through the study period; 4. The number of new additions has increased through the study period for all lots; S. There were more new additions on lots less than 9000 square feet than there were new additions on lots more than 9000 square feet; 6. Although the number of new additions on lots less than 9000 square feet has increased through the study period, new additions account for a similar percent of all permits through the study period. 7. The size of new additions has increased over the study period. MASSING RELATED ACTION OPTIONS: The monitoring and review process has further illustrated the complexity of the issue. At this point the Council has at least the following options: 1. Maintain the existing regulations and policies without further action; 2. Open the issue for public comment in a public hearing format; 3. Solicit comment on the issue from various special interest groups; 4. Direct staff to prepare specific ordinance revisions and illustrate their effects; S. Direct staff to continue to monitor and review the issue. NUMBER OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED FROM 1080 -1088 IN THE COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1981 1983 1985 1987 j PERMIT BREAKDOWN BY TYPE IN THE COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT 1980 -88 CONVERT & INTERIOR '` -70-f\ NEW: LOT>9000 'SF (20 %) NEW: LOT<9000 SF (17 %) LN TOTAL VALUE IN DO]L]LARS FOR PERMITS ISSUED 1080 -88 IN COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT WK we !.se 500 c 0 0 400 IKK w 100 x 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1981 1983 1985 1987 w NUMBER OF NEW ADDITIONS FROM 1080 -1088 Is 15 10 7 A IN THE COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1981 1983 1985 1987 4 Number of New Permits According t0 Lot 50 ire,, 30 20 10 ME Size for 1980-83 and 1985-88 <9000+ >9000+ 1980 -83 New Additions on Lots < 0000 Sq. Ft. 1980 -83 All Other Permits (72% ew Additions (28 %) 0) li } New Additions on ]Lots C 0000 Sq. ]fit. 1985 -1988 All Other Permits (M, ?w Additions (29 %) V AVERAGE AREA OF NEW ADDITIONS ON ]LOS'S FOR 1080 -88 IN COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1981 1983 1985 1987 9 VARIANCE HISTORY IN THE COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT 1980 -1988 Total Number of Variances: 26 Number Of Variances Relative To Lot Size Lots less than 75' Wide - 15 Lots more than 75' Wide - 11 Lots less than 9000 s.f. in area - 14 Lots more than 9000 s.f. in area - 12 Number Of Lot Coverage Variances On Lots Less Than 9000 S.F. 1980 -1983 - 4 1985 -1988 - 0 Number Of Variances By Structure Type Garages------- - - - - -3 Garages with other structures - 2 Two story additions - - - - - - 7 All other------- - - - -14 %r A. At . 4 e n ♦J 'sr JI; REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item # y-A From: TED PAULFRANZ Consent 0 Information Only ❑ Date: MAY 2, 1990 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: PROPOSED ORDINANCE Fx-� To Council NO. 613 Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution 0 Ordinance Recommendation: Adoption of new Ordinance No. 613 to update Fire Code to meet requirements of new State Fire Code. Info /Background: Minnesota Statute requires local Fire Code to meet minimum provisions. New State Code necessitates local update. See attached analysis & overview. C A M E M O R A N D U M DATE: May 2, 1990 TO: Ken Rosland, City Manager FROM: Ted Paulfranz, Fire Chief Steve Landry, Fire Inspector SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT A NEW FIRE CODE ORDINANCE NO. 613 Attached is the new Fire Code Ordinance No. 613. The purpose of this new ordinance is to update our local ordinance and bring it into line with the current State Fire Code and Building Code Statutes. The attached ordinance has been reviewed by Mr. Thomas Erickson and incorporates all changes identified by Mr. Erickson's review. The majority of this new Ordinance No. 613_ is a restatement of Ordinance 612, with exceptions as follows: - Section 1: (a) & (b) Adoption of the current State Fire Codes MUFC and UFC by reference. Section 2: (a) & (b) Identifying referenced codes to be on file Section 3: (a) no change (b) delete definition of corporate council (c) no change Section 4: no change Section 5: no change Section 6: no change Section 7: (b), (c) & (d) New language requiring maintenance of existing fire lanes by the property owner, change curb marking and identify limits and signs. Section 8: no change Section 9: no change Memo to Ken Rosland May 2, 1990 Page 2 of 2 Section 10. Amendments to the MUFC and UFC. (a) Article 4 (1) Editorial changes and deleting reference to assembly occupancies. (b) Article 10 (1) New language to require permits and fees under Ordinances No. 645 and 171 re�--nectively for the installation of fire protection systems. (c) Article 11 (1) New language to identify barbecue requirements and delete Ordinance No. 631. Section 11: no change Section 12: Identify ordinances repealed by this ordinance, and eliminating some outdated and obsolete ordinances. SUMMARY OF STATE FIRE CODE (MUFC) CHANGES Included here are a selection of changes that have been identified as controversial or of special interest during the code development, public hearing, and adoption process: 1. 1982 National Fire Code (NFC) - NFPA The NFC has been deleted by the State Fire Code unless specifically referenced by the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code. This was done in an attempt to provide for more uniform enforcement of this code. 2. ARTICLE 11, "General Precautions Against Fire" The new State Fire Code has adopted a set of requirements for barbecues in multiple dwellings in response to an increasing number of fires associated with the operation of these devices. This language is more restrictive than Ordinance No. 631. The problem lies in our inability to enforce requirements less restrictive than this code. Our option is to adopt this language or delete it and enforce nothing. Our recommendation is to adopt the new language in State Fire Code and repeal our current barbecue ordinance, Ordinance No. 631. 3. ARTICLE 80 Hazardous Materials Recent Federal legislation has delegated a significant increase in the role of the State and local jurisdictions' responsibility to handle hazardous materials incidents. This code section gives us a uniform guide for code enforcement that hopefully will assist us in pre - planning, inspection and code enforcement, operations and recordkeeping based on this new Federal legislation. TRP /SDL /ras Attachment ORDINANCE NO. 613 AN ORDINANCE'ADOPTING THE MINNESOTA UNIFORM FIRE CODE AND THE NATIONAL FIRE CODE BY REFERENCE, ESTABLISHING A BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, REQUIRING PERMITS, AUTHORIZING ESTABLISHMENT OF FIRE LANES, IMPOSING A PENALTY AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 612. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Adoption of Codes and Standards. There is adopted and incorporated herein by reference as an ordinance of the City: (a) The Minnesota Uniform Fire Code promulgated by the Department of Public Safety of the State of Minnes -ta, published in the State Register on May 22, 1989, and adopted as published in the State Register on September 25, 1989, (which Code is hereinafter referred to as the "MUFC ") with the changes and omissions hereinafter set forth; (b) The 1988 Edition of the Uniform Fire Code, as published by the International Conference of Building Officials and the Western Fire Chiefs Association (hereinafter referred to as "UFC "), with the changes and omissions hereinafter set forth. Section 2. Codes and Ordinance on File. One copy of each of the following codes, with the changes and omissions hereinafter set forth, each marked "Official Copy ", shall be filed in the office of the Clerk prior to publication of this ordinance and shall remain on-file and available for use and examination by the public: (a) MUFC; (b) UFC. The Clerk shall furnish copies of said codes or standards at cost to any person upon request. Also, additional copies of this ordinance shall be kept in the office of the fire department.for distribution to the public. Section 3. Definitions. (a) Wherever the word "jurisdiction" is used in the MUFC, it shall mean the City of Edina. (b) Wherever the term "chief" is used in the MUFC, it shall mean the Chief of the Edina Fire Department or his authorized representative. Section 4. Establishment of the Bureau of Fire Prevention. (a) The Bureau of Fire Prevention is hereby established in the Fire Department of the City. It shall be operated under the supervision of the Chief of the Fire Department. The members'of the Bureau of Fire Prevention shall be the Chief of the Fire Department, an Assistant Chief of the Fire Department and all Inspectors of the Fire Department. The Chief of the Fire Department from time to time may appoint Inspectors of the Fire Department. (b) A report of the Bureau of Fire Prevention shall be made annually and transmitted to the Manager. It shall contain all proceedings under this ordinance with such statistics as the Chief of the Fire Department may wish to include therein; the Chief of the Fire Department shall also recommend any amendments to this ordinance which in his judgment shall be desirable. Section 5. Enforcement; Appeals. The provisions of this ordinance shall be enforced by the Building Official and the Bureau of Fire Prevention in accordance with Sections 3 through 10, inclusive, of Ordinance No. 471. Appeals from any order made by the Building Official or the Bureau of Fire Prevention shall be made in accordance with Sections 3 through 10, inclusive, of ordinance No. 471. Section 6. Permit Fee. The fee for each permit required by this ordinance and for each annual ,renewal thereof shall be established by Ordinance No. 171. All permits unless otherwise noted shall expire one year from the date of issuance. Section 7. Orders Establishing Fire Lanes. (a) The Bureau of Fire Prevention is hereby authorized to order the establishment of fire lanes on public or private property as may be necessary to comply with the MUFC and in order that the travel of fire equipment may not be interfered with and that access to fire hydrants or buildings may not be obstructed. (b) Fire lanes in existence prior to the effective date of this ordinance shall be permitted to remain using their present signs so long as such signs are maintained in good repair and condition. The first and last sign shall mark the limits of the fire lane. If the Bureau of Fire Prevention determines that such signs are not maintained as herein required, it may require signing as provided in paragraph (c) of this Section. (c) Fire lanes established or 'existing fire lanes changed following the effective date of this ordinance shall be marked by signs, not more than 50 feet apart, bearing the words, "NO PARKING, FIRE LANE, BY ORDER OF FIRE CHIEF ", with the first and last sign marking the limits of the fire lane. The signs shall have red letters and a red border on a white background, shall be 12 inches by 18 inches in size, and shall otherwise comply with the standards from time to time established by the Chief for such signs. (d) When the fire lane is on public property or public right -of -way, the sign or signs shall be erected and maintained by the City, and when on private property, they shall be erected by the owner at his expense within 30 days after he has been notified of the order and thereafter shall be maintained by the owner at his expense. After such signs are erected, no person shall park a vehicle on or otherwise occupy or obstruct the fire lane. (e) Whenever any member of the Bureau of Fire Prevention or a Police Officer finds a vehicle unattended and obstructing a fire lane, such member of the Bureau of Fire Prevention or Police Officer is hereby authorized to provide for removal of such vehicle to the nearest convenient garage or other place of safety outside the limits of the ,fire lane, at the expense of the owner. (f) Violations of this section are exempted from the provisions of Section 8 of this ordinance and instead shall be governed and enforced by Ordinance No. 175. Section 8. Violation. No person shall be convicted of violating this ordinance unless he or she shall have been given notice of the violation in writing and a reasonable time to comply. Section 9. Penalty. Any person violating any provision of this ordinance or of any order made pursuant hereto shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to penalties pursuant to Ordinance No. 175. Section 10. Amendments to the MUFC and UFC. (a) Article 4 "Permits Required ", of UFC is included in its entirety with the following changes: (1) Section 4.108,1.1 of UFC is amended to read as follows: "Where a single container or the aggregate of interconnected containers is 500 or more gallons water capacity, the installer shall.obtain a permit and plan approval from the Chief." (b) Article 10, "Fire Protection" of UFC as adopted by MUFC is amended as follows: (1) Section 10.301 of UFC as adopted by MUFC is amended by adding thereto a new subsection (g), reading as follows: "(g) Permits for installation of fire protection systems shall be secured as provided for in City Ordinance No. 645, and fees established as provided for in City Ordinance No. 171." (c) Article 11, "General Precautions Against Fire" of UFC as adopted'by MUFC is amended as follows: (1) Section 11.117(a) of UFC as adopted by MUFC is amended by deleting the phrase "when required by the Chief ". Section 11. Interpretation. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of the MUFC, UFC, and the Minnesota State Building Code, as adopted by the ordinances of the City of Edina, and the provisions of this ordinance, the most stringent provision shall apply. Section 12. Repealer. Ordinances 612, 621 and 631 are repealed in their entirety. Section 13. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor A. 4 A e >1� ^� , o v• • RPO"' b 1886 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER Agenda Item # K=B From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Consent � Information Only U Date: MAY 3, 1990 i Mgr. Recommends To HRA Subject: ORDINANCE NO. 803A -4 n To Council Action! Motion Resolution !x I Ordinance Discussion Recommendation: First Reading of Ordinance No. 803 -A4 Relating to Community Development and Planning Commission. Info /Background: Attorney Erickson has drafted the attached ordinance amendment and has provided background information in support of the recommendation for adoption. r ORDINANCE NO. 803A -4 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 803 TO DELETE LIMITATION ON SERVICE BY COMMISSION MEMBERS, TO CORRECT ORDINANCE REFERENCES, AND TO ALLOW COUNCIL TO REPLACE ANY COMMISSION MEMBER NOT HAVING A LEGAL RESIDENCE IN THE CITY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 2 of Ordinance No. 803 is hereby amended to delete therefrom the following sentence: "However, no Commission members shall be reappointed to the Commission if he or she has served on the Community Development and Planning Commission for. a cumulative period of twelve or more years (whether or not consecutive)." Sec. 2. References in Ordinance No. 803 to other ordinances of the City are hereby amended and corrected as follows: a. References to "Platting Ordinance (No. 801)" are changed to "Platting Ordinance (No. 804) "; b. References to "Zoning Ordinance (No. 811)" are changed to "Zoning Ordinance (No. 825)'; C. Reference in the heading of Ordinance No. 803 to Ordinance No. 801 is corrected to No. 802; and d. Reference to the "Flood Plain Management Ordinance (No. 815)" is changed to the "Flood Plain Overlay District (Sect. 21 of Ordinance No. 825) ". Sec. 3. The next to last sentence of Section 2 of Ordinance No. 803 is hereby amended to read as follows: "Commission members who discontinue legal residence in the City-&-h—all .... t,..., atie., iiy be _ ...,, upcl i m cai may be removed from office 4 the Mayor with the consent of a majority-of members of the Council." Sec. 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest: Clerk -2- Mayor i :r 360 PARK AVENUE NEW TORN, NEW TORE 10022 (212)415 -0200 360 FIRST NATIONAL BANE RUILDINO P. 0. BOX 646 I=BESTEH, MINNESOTA 66000 (607)266 -3156 610 NORTH CENTRAL LIFE TOWER 446 MINNESOTA STREET ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA 66101 ( 612) 227 -8017 315 FIRST NATIONAL RANK BVILDINO WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 66301 (612) 476 -03rd 0 ORACECRURCB STREET LONDON EC3V OAT, ENGLAND -OI- 920 -3304 Mr. Craig Larsen City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55420 DOBSEY & WHITNEY A PYiRe EW INCLMINO Pv MSWIMI CORM"WO S 2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 ( 612) 340-2600 TELEX 29 -0605 TELECOPIER (612)340 -2868 THOMAS S. EMCESON 612- 340-2859 April 16, 1990 1200 FIRST INTERSTATE CENTER 401 NORTH 31- STREET P. 0. BOX 7186 BILLINGS, MONTANA 59103 (406)252.3800 201 DAVIDSON BUILDING 8 THIRD STREET NORTH GREAT FALLS, MONTANA 59401 (406)727 -3632 127 EAST FRONT STREET MISSOUTA, MONTANA 59502 (406)721-6025 30 ROE LA BoETIE 75008 PARIS, FRANCE OD -33 (1)43- 59 -13 -65 0E- 33(1)46- 62 -32 -50 Re: Ordinance No. 803A -4 (Community Development Planning Commission) Dear Craig: I enclose herewith a proposed Ordinance No. 803A -4. This is a "housekeeping" amendment to delete the limitation on service of Commission members (consistent with the prior action of the Council on this subject), to correct references to ordinances which have been renumbered, or were erroneous in the first instance, and to change the sentence relative to automatic termination of members who move from the City to a provision allowing the Council to remove such members. As to the last item in the amendment, as we have previously discussed, I believe the "automatic termination provisions" could present difficulties. For example, a member who may have been "automatically" terminated by virtue of this language may yet, out of ignorance, appear at a Commission meeting and vote on a controversial matter. The parties opposing the action of the Commission could then take the position that the vote of that member was improperly cast, and therefore the Commission action is void, at least if the improper vote was the deciding vote on an issue. If the enclosed meets with your approval, I presume you can make arrangements to have it put on the Council agenda. DORSEY & WHITNEY April 16, 1990 Page 2 If you have any questions, please call me. Very truly yours, Thomas S. Erickson TSE:jd enclosure cc: Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland Ms. Marcella Daehn f/ Y o e t U) 0 • `N�bRroMtbJ • lase REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER Agenda Item # —.c From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Consent Fx ] Information Only ❑ Date: MAY 3, 1990 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: ORDINANCE NO. 162A -2 ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution y Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: First Reading of Ordinance No. 162A -2 - To Provide That Failure to Attend Meetings of Boards /Commissions May Result in Removal From Office. Info /Background: Attorney Erickson has drafted the attached ordinance and has provided background information for the Council's consideration of the ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. 162 -A2 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 162 TO PROVIDE THAT FAILURE TO ATTEND REGULAR OR SPECIAL MEETINGS QF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS MAY RESULT IN REMOVAL FROM OFFICE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 2 of.Ordinance No. 162 is hereby amended to read as follows: "Sec. 2. Removal. Any public member of either the Edina Park Board, Edina Human Relations Commission, Edina Environmental Quality Commission, Teen Recreation Board, Building Construction Appeals Board, Board of Appeals and Adjustment, the Planning Commission, or any other board or commission hereafter created or approved by the City Council, who fails to attend three (3) consecutive meetings thereof, whether regular or special, or who fails to attend any four (4) meetings, whether regular or special, in the span of twelve consecutive months, shah- atit- amati-eally- be- reEReved- €Fete e € €i-ee may be removed from office by the Mayor with the consent of a majority of the members of the Council." Sect. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately on its passage and publication. First Reading: 1990 Second Reading: 1990 Published in the Edina Sun on 1990. Attest: City Clerk Mayor n ORDINANCE NO. 162 -A2 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 162 TO PROVIDE THAT FAILURE TO ATTEND REGULAR OR SPECIAL MEETINGS QF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS MAY RESULT IN REMOVAL FROM OFFICE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 2 of.Ordinance No. 162 is hereby amended to read as follows: "Sec. 2. Removal. Any public member of either the Edina Park Board, Edina Human Relations Commission, Edina Environmental Quality Commission, Teen Recreation Board, Building Construction Appeals Board, Board of Appeals and Adjustment, the Planning Commission, or any other board or commission hereafter created or approved by the City Council, who fails to attend three (3) consecutive meetings thereof, whether regular or special, or who fails to attend any four (4) meetings, whether regular or special, in the span of twelve consecutive months, shah- atit- amati-eally- be- reEReved- €Fete e € €i-ee may be removed from office by the Mayor with the consent of a majority of the members of the Council." Sect. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately on its passage and publication. First Reading: 1990 Second Reading: 1990 Published in the Edina Sun on 1990. Attest: City Clerk Mayor C� 330 PARK AVENUE NEW TORK, NEW YORK 10022 (212)415 -9200 1330 CONNECTICUT AVENUE. N - W WASMNOTON, D. C. 20036 (202)857 -0700 3 ORACECBUHCR STREET LONDON RC3V OAT, ENGLAND O1- 929 -3334 36,RUE TRONCHET 75009 PARIS, PRANCE 01- 42- 66 -59 -49 FAR EAST FINANCE CENTER HONG KONG 852 -5- 8612555 DORSEY & WHITNEY A P-. ERSRIp 1NCLUDINO PRO.ESS10- CORM T1ONS 2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 (612) 340-2600 TELEX 29 -0603 FAX (612) 340 -2868 THOMAS S. ERICKSON, P. A. (612) 340 -2659 April 24, 1990 Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Re: Ordinance No. 162 Dear Ken: '340 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING ROCRESTE R, MINNESOTA 33903 (307)288 -3156 315 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 53391 (612)475 -0373 1200 FIRST INTERSTATE CENTER BILLINGS, MONTANA 59103 (406) 252-:1800 201 DAVIDSON BUILDING GREAT FALLS, MONTANA 59401 (406)727 -3632 127 EAST FRONT STREET MISSOULA, MONTANA 59802 (406)721 -6025 I enclose herewith a proposed Amendment to Ordinance No. 162 changing an automatic removal from office to 'a permi -ssive removal from office of those members of certain commissions and boards who fail to attend three consecutive meetings or four meetings in the span of twelve consecutive months. I propose this change because of the concern I have that an automatic removal may result in one or more people being removed from office "automatically" but who will thereafter continue to attend and vote out of ignorance and which would then give rise to questions about the propriety of the meeting and the validity of the vote. I believe that removal by Council action will eliminate that problem. I give this to you for placing on the Council agenda if you wish to do so. This procedure is similar to that suggested for the Community Development and Planning Commission by an Ordinance Amendment proposal sent to Craig Larsen on April 16, a copy of which letter and proposed Ordinance were given to you. If you have any questions please let me know. TSE:cac Encl. cc (w /encl): Marcella Daehn Very truly yours, Thomas S. Erickson �1 o� e ch o •'N�RPOMT�J/ iBeB REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER Agenda Item # v1 _A From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: MAY 3, 1990 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA- Subject: TRAPPING AND RELATED ❑ To Council ORDINANCE NOS. 1071 AND 1222 Action 1 I U Motion ❑ Resolution Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Info /Background: As you requested, I have researched the Council Minutes on the subject of trapping beginning with minutes of November 6, 1978 and subsequent discussion and action by the Council. 304 11/6/78 Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilman Richards. Rollcall: Ayes: Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Shaw, Van Valkenburg Nays: None Resolution adopted. CABLE TELEVISION SERVICE TERRITORY-GIVEN QUALIFIED APPROVAL. Mr. Campbell pre - sented the petition of-Northern Cablevisioa, Inc., for the .City to join St. Louis Park, Hopkins, Richfield, Eden Prairie and Minnetonka in establishing a cable television service territory. He explained that this cable service territory is a requirement of the State Cable Board but that it does not take away the City's opportunity to franchise whomever it wishes. The cable service territory is a non - exclusive territory. Mr. Campbell emphasized that in adopting the resolution requested by Northern Cablevision, the Council is not authorizing or awarding any franchise to Northern Cablevision. In attendance at the meeting also were Messrs. Robert McDonald, William Schiller-and W. D. Donaldson of the Cable TV Board. Following discussion, Councilman Courtney offered the following resolution and moved its adoption:, A RESOLUTION DENOTING QUALIFIED APPROVAL OF A PROPOSED CABLE SERVICE TERRITORY WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE MUNICIPALITIES OF BLOOMINGTON, EDINA, RICHFIELD, EDEN PRAIRIE, ST. LOUIS PARK, HOPKINS AND MINNETONKA WHEREAS, Northern Cablevision, Inc., ( "Northern "), has given notice of its intent to propose a cable service territory ( "CST ") within the boundaries of the munici- palities of Bloomington, Edina, Richfield, Eden Prairie, St. Louis Park, Hopkins and Minnetonka; and WHEREAS, such a proposal. must be submitted to the Minnesota Cable Communications Board ( "MCCB ") for approval; and WHEREAS, the MCCB has been charged by law with the duty of approving cable ser- vice territories within which a franchise may be awarded and the procedures to be followed for alteration of cable service territory boundaries; and WHEREAS, the MCCB has adopted certain regulations relating to the processing of proposals for the establishment of CSTs, which regulations include a provision that the MCCB shall require and consider, among other information, resolutions from the governing bodies of all municipalities contacted by the party or parties proposing the CST, stating their approval or disapproval of such proposal, and a provision that the MCCB shall consider 'a number of factors in determining ir.:; approval or rejection of a CST; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina does not yet have information addressing the factors to be considered by the MCCB in the approval or rejection of a CST, and does not now know what the effect upon the City of Edina and its citizens would be in terms of enfranchising a cable communications system if it were included in the proposed CST; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina does not oppose being considered for inclusion in the proposed CST, but desires to have complete information about all relevant factors and criteria before being required to state its position on the merits of being, included cr excluded; and WHEREAS, the regulations require the City either to approve of disapprove of the proposed CST prior to the filing of the application and the receipt of all such factors and 'criteria and the opportunity to examine and study the same; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, that: 1. The City of Edina does not object to being considered for inclusion within the proposed CST described above. 2. The City of Edina takes no position.at this time on the merits of its being included in or excluded from the proposed CST. 3. The City of Edina approves of the proposed CST for the sole purpose of fulfilling the regulations of MCCB requiring approval or disapproval, and requests that it be permitted to participate fully as an interested party, in any proceedings relating to the establishment of the proposed CST or any modification thereof. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilman Shaw. Rollcall: Aves: Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Shaw, Van Valkenburg Nays: None Resolution adopted. Councilman Richards requested that a record be kept of time spent by the staff in regard to cable television. TRA,°PINC ORDINANCE TO BE DRAFTED. Council's attention was called to a letter from Mrs. Bette Kent, 5913 Ewing Ave., requesting that trapping be prohibited within the Citv and also that the sale of angel jaw leghold traps be prohibited. Mrs. Kent introduced Mrs. Nancy Nelson, 5854 Creek Valivv Road, urged that an ordinance he adopted which would prevent additional injury of children and household pets. 11/6/73 305 Mr. Rosland said that he agreed that the leghold trap should be banned but that he did nor believe that the City should legislate trapping on private property. Chief Swanson spoke of the occasional need to use live traps for beavers and small rodents by the City. Tn response to a question of Councilman Richards, Mrs. Nelson said that none of the local hardware stores sell the leghold trap. Councilman Courtney's motion was seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt, requesting that the City Attorney draft an ordinance banning the steel jawed leg - hold trap and prohibiting trapping in the City of Edina except when deemed neces- sary by the City. Ayes: Courtney, Schmidt, Shaw, Van Valkenburg Nays: Richards Motion carried. METROPOLITAN COUNCILMAN DIRK DE VRIES INTRODUCED. Mrs. Alison Fuhr introduced Mr. Dirk deVries of the Metropolitan Council who was welcomed to the meeting. HALIFAX AVENUE WELL REPAIR BID AWARDED. Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of four bids received for repair of the Halifax Avenue well. Tabulation showed Layne Minnesota Company low bidder at $1,900.50 without the bowl assembly and $4,075.50 with the bowl assembly. Other bids were from Kevs Well Drilling Company. Berger - son Caswell and McCarthy Well Co. Councilman Courtnev's motion for award to recom- mended low bidder, Layne Minnesota Company, with the decision as to whether the work is to be done with or without the bowl assembly to be made after the pump has been examined. Ayes: Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Shaw, Van Valkenburg Nays: None Motion carried. _ SANITARY SEWER LIFT STATION EMERGENCY REPAIR BID AWARD CONFIRMED. Mr. Rosland advised Council that.an emergency situation had developed with the sanitary sewer lift station at 72nd and Oaklawn and that G.L. Contracting had been requested to make the necessary repairs.. Councilman Courtney's motion was seconded by Council- woman Schmidt confirming Mr. Hoffman's action in awarding the bid. Ayes: Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Shaw, Van Valkenburg _Nays: None Motion carried. CITY HALL WINDOW COVERING CONTINUED. As recommended by Mr. Rosland, it was generall agreed to continue award of bids for storm coverings for City Hall windows until further study can be made. EDINA JUNIOR FOOTBALL LEAGUE PICTURES BID AWARDED. Mr. Rosland presented a request for purchase of pictures of football teams for the Edina Junior Football League with the understanding that the League will reimburse the City. Councilwoman Schmidt's motion for award to Lee's Photography b Art, the only bidder, at $1,298.00 was seconded by Councilman Richards. Ayes: Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Shaw, Van Valkenburg Nays: None Moticn carried. GRADER BLADES PURCHASE AUTHORIZED. Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of two bids for 50 double bevel curved grader blades and 50 plow blades to be used as changes are necessary during the snow plowing season. Tabulation showed Paper Calmenson 5 Co. low bidder at $5,176.00, with Borchert- Intersoll, Inc., at $6,107.00. Councilman Courtney's motion for award to low bidder, Paper Calmenson b Co. at $5,176.00 was seconded by Councilman Richards. Ayes: Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Shaw, Van Valkenburg Nays: None Motion carried. INTERLACHEN HILLS THIRD ADDITION CURB AND GiTTER DISCUSSED: REOVEST FOR BLACK- TOP CURB AND OTTER DENIED. Mr. Rosland advised Council that Mr. Wallace Kenneth, developer of Interlachen Hills Third Addition, had requested permission to install blacktop curb and gutter, rather than the cement curb and gutter as orig- inally agreed. Mr. Kenneth urged that he be allowed to use blacktop inasmuch as Mr. Dunn had said that he could use either cement or blacktop, because cement is difficult to buy and because he actually prefers the "V "' asphalt curb. Mr. Ken- neth also said that the Developer's Agreement which he sicned did not specify that concrete be used. In response to Mr. Kenneth's contention that he was no notified of the improvement hearing, Councilman Richards read from the minutes of November 21, 1977, which indicated that Mr. Kenneth had attended that meeting. Followinc Jcngthy discussion, Councilman Shaw's motion was tivcondvd by Councilman 11/20/78 3 1 CITY NhWSI.I:TTER DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland advised that no definite arrangements have heen 11111e with the School District as to pnblishin}; a joint newsletter. He said that if no arranl;ements are made within the next week or two, he will recom- mend :hat the City send out a newsletter on its own with the homestead forms. No action was taken. ORDINANCE NOS. 1071 AND '1222 -A1 ADOPTED Mr. Rosland presented 'Ordinance Nos.' 1071 and 1222 -A1 and explained to Ms. Nancy Nelson Carlson the intent of the ord- inances.. Councilman Courtney then offered the following ordinances for First Reading, with waiver of Second Reading and moved their adoption: ORDINANCE. NO. 1071 AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING THE USE OF CERTAIN TRAPS, AND PRESCRIBING A PENALTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA,_ MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Declaration: Purpose. The City Council of the City of Edina hereby finds and declares that the use of steel -jaw, leghold traps within the City of Edina is potentially harmful to the citizens of Edina, particularly children, and to domesticated animals and fowl, and is unnecessarily harmful, painful, and injurious to wild animals; that, therefore, it is the purpose of this ordinance to promote the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the City of Edina by prohibiting the use of steel - jawed, legbold traps in the manner hereinafter set out. Sec. 2. Definitions. As used in this ordinance: "Trap" means a steel - jawed, leghold trap. "Trapping" means to set, lay, prepare, or use any steel -jawed leghold trap. Sec. 3. Trapping Prohibited. Trapping within the City of Edina is pro- hibited. Sec. 4. Penalty. Any person violating this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Sec. 5. This ordinance shall be ih full force and effect upon its pass- age and publication. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt. Rollcall: Ayes: Courtney, Schmidt, Shaw, Van Valkenburg Nays: None Ordinance adopted. ATTEST: City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 1222 -A1 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1222 TO ALLOW TRAPPING IN PUBLIC PARKS BY AGENTS OF THE CITY OF EDINA THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Subparagraph (b) of Sec.'8 of Ordinance No. 1222 is hereby amended by adding thereto the following sentence: "The prohibition in this subparagraph (b) shall not apply to trapping done by the City of Edina, or done under its direction, or done by any other govern- mental agency or department with the permission of the City of Edina; provided that in no event shall steel - jawed, leghold traps be used." Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Motion for adoption of the Ordinance was seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt. Rollcall: Ayes: Courtney, Schmidt, Shaw, Van Valkenburg Nays: None Ordinance adopted. / ATTEST: City Clerk / Mayor STATE AID HIGHWAY RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED As recommended by the City Engineer, Councilman Courtney offered the following resolutions and moved their, adoption: RLSOLUTION ESTARLISIU NG MUNICIPAL STATE AID HICHWAYS WHEREAS, it appears to the City Council of the Citv_ of Edina, Minnesota, that the streets hereinafter described should he designated Municipal State Aid Streets under the provisions of Minnesota laws of 1959, Chapter 500; 7/21 i9 141 i_)LTi1 nt:PA"rTMF:dT CON Ti I'll ;NCF REPO ^T CO ?1MEriDED. Mayor Van VaPM1enburg commended rtrs. Colleen Faul.us on her report on the conference .which was attended by the Health Department.. No action was taken. PARK DEPARTMENT COMPLIMENTED ON U.S.G.A. WOMEN'S AMATEUR PUBLIC LINKS TOURNAMENT. Mayor Van Valkenburg publicly thanked Mr. Kojetin and all members of the Park Department and commended them on the excellent job they had cone to make the U.S.G.A. Women's Amateur Public Links Tournament a success. -Councilman Bredesen advised also that the winner of the tournament had commented on the excellent condition of the golf course. No action was taken. PAMELA S. MILLER SUIT NOTED. Mr. Rosland advised Council that a suit had been brought against the City by Pamela S. Miller and said that the matter had been referred to the City Attorney and that it would be defended in Conciliation Court. No action was taken. LIWCON FUNDS APPLICATION APPROVED FOR BREDES_EN _PART:. As recocmmended by Mr. Hughes, Councilwoman Schmidt offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED that the City staff be and is hereby authorized to prepare and sub- nit an application for a LAWCON /LCe:R (Land and Water Conservation /Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources) grant for the development of Bredesen Park Nature Area. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilman Bredesen. Q Rollcall: Q Ayes: Bredesen, Schmidt, Van Valkenburg Q Nays: None Resolution adopted. ORDINANCE 1:0. 311 -Al2 ADOPTED ON SECOND READING. Councilwoman. Schmidt offered Ordinance No. 311 -Al2 for Second Reading and craved its adoption as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 311 -Al2 AN ORDINi1NC°_ AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 311 TO ALLOW CITY COUNCIL TO GRANT APPROVAL FOR HARBORING MORE THAN TWO DOGS OVER SIX MONTHS OF AGE A7 ANY PLACE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIT'! OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 17 (d) of Ordinance No. 311 is herebv amended to read as follows: "(d) No more than two animals over six months of age shall be kept or harbored at any place except in a licensed pet shop or licensed animal hospital, unless permission has been granted by the Board of Health in accordance with Ordinance No. 302." Sec. '_'. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. :Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Councilman Bredesen. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen., Schmidt, Can Valkenburg :'aye: None Ordinance adopted. ATTEST I/. City Clerk "favor TRAPPING ORDINANCES GRANTED FIRST READING. Mr..Rosland presented Ordinance Nos. 1071 -A1 and '?_22 -A2 which have been proposed because traps presently allowed are ineffective against the beavers which are causing a real nuisance in various are:cs of the City. rayon Van Valkenburg said that he gathered List; at the ti-:a the '_ag- aold traps were banned, concerned residents realized that some alternate actic% might be necessary in the. case of an emergency. 'Mr. Rosland added that there is also a problem with Sepiers chcwin^ through underground ii hti:>> cables end that _._orts o,cld be made to find to Corbat Z ";!E: prrbla-.:. Cuunci_..oman Schmidt then offered the followi::Q ord.inan�.es fo_ . _rs!: 013,DINA.NC7 NO. 1071-A1 AN ORDINANCE NO. 7071 TJ AL1.Cid TVAP_ 1 :!, T,Y THE CITY Oi' EDINA AND OTHERS WITH PKi,Pf1SSION OF THE CITY P11aACER THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY .07 ED' NA, MINNESOTA, O D,1,JNS:- Section 1. Sec. 3 ui Ord un_lnre 1071 is .,crcbv amended to read as foL- lous: —ii) 142 "Sec. 3. Trappitf' i'runUoited. Trapping %rithin thu City of Edi.na is prohibited, excopt that trappiny,iri: i.e done 10y the City of Edina, or m::y be done under its direction, or may be done by any other governuental agency or department with the written permission of the City Manager, or may be done by any person with a valid trapping license issued by the State of Minnesota and with the written permission of the City Manager." Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. ORDINANCE NO. 1222 -A2 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1222 TO ALLOW TRAPPING IN PUBLIC PARES BY THE CITY OF EDINA, AND OTHERS WITH PERMISSION OF THE CITY MANAGER THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. The last sentence of subparagraph (b) of Sec. 8 of Ordinance No. 1222 is hereby amended to read as follows: "The prohibition in this subparagraph (b) and in subparagraph (a) of this Sec. 8 shall not apply to trapping by any means or methods done by the City of Edina, or done under its direction, or done by any other governmental agency or department with the written permission of the City Manager, or done by any par- son with a valid trapping license issued by the State of Pinnesota and with the written permission of the City Manager." Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and.publication. BIDS TO BE TAKEN FOR PUBLIC ! *T -ROVE ?!EATS. As re'-ommended by Mr. Hoffman, Council- woman Sr_hmidt offered the following resolution and movad its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVI`:G PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PROPOSED I`!PROVE`!ENTS AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PUBLIC I`IPROVE ENTS NUMBERS SANITARY SEWER, LIFT S ATIO`-. AND FORCEMAIN LS -9 PERMANE ?:T STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB A :,D GUTTED AND STOP:I SEWER 3A -227A SANITARY SEWER NO. SS -352 AND ?2ATERNLAIN NO. WM -336 '6E IT RESOLVED ZY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF F.DINA, MINNESOTA: 1. The plans and specifications for the proposed improvements set forth in the following Advertisement for Bids form, heretofore prepared by the City Engineer and now on file in the office of the City Clerk are hereby approved. 2. The Clerk shall cause to be published in the Edina Sun and Construction Eullaton the following notice of bids for improvements: (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50TIl STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 AD\ _RTISEXIL :1 70R BIDS SANITA Y 5EldE1 , LIFT STATION AND FORCES L-kIN LS -9 !i :L1l•:ENT STREET SURF, %CINC. WITH CONCRETE CURT? AND GTTTER AND STORM SEWER BA -227A SANITARY SEWER SS -352 .+ATEF'•L%I'1 NO. Wid -336 CONTRACT 79 -6, 79 -7, 79 -8 AND 79 -9 LIDS CLOSE AUGUST 3, 1979 SEALED BIDS will be received and opened in the Council Chambers in Edina City Hall, 450; 30th Street at 11:00 a.-., August 3, 1979, and the Edina City Council will meet ar. 7:00 p.m.. Monday, .lu;;u,r 6, 197/9, to consider said bills for Sanitary Sewer, Lift _ration, Force :rLin, Permanent Street Surfacing with Concrete Curb and Gutter and l :arermain. There ill be trio Separate bids and not zie(i.. The followln, :Are approxi:rate ,ua,:r.ities of thr: -ajcr ite ms - "0VEy!:1 :7 Pumps =, _, 5' � . I . i'. S :•.ocL' :lain 1 e!,5 f 'F. 10" ...! ... Farces Main _ "L:;. Mannni.,; 1).0.,, . 3331 ..itunir.cu :; '1"ROVEMENT ::1 --:—.7-A . - 7 ;IN79 14� CROSSTOWN 'r.f.Gwiy,, rmisF L`IsCDSSIa). ',ouucil's attention was called to a letter signed by fourteen families living on Parnell, Ryan and Virginia Avenues neat: the Northeast gradrant of the Crosstown. Highway and Highway 100 which requested that some action be taken to reduce the noise level in their area. The hitter emphasized that some signers did not want a wall constructed and suggested that the speed limit on the Crosstown Highway could be reduced to 45 miles per hour, which action would cause many trucks to use Interstate 494. Mr. Rosland said that lie did not think that the speed reduction would be practical but suggested an earth berm and /or a heavy planting of spruce trees would help solve the problem. An unidentified lady who lives on Wyman Avenue said that the noise also causes difficulty in her neighborhood and asked if something could be done to help her area. She was told that, because her area is higher than the highway, it would be difficult to help in that area. Councilman Richards suggested, that the staff contact residents to determine if they would like a berm and trees before taking any further action.• Mr. Rosland said that he would bring the matter back for Council's determination. No formal action was taken. TRAPPING ORDINANCE DISCUSSED; NO ACTION TAKEN AS THIS TIME. Mr. Rosland recalled that in November, 1978, the Council had adopted Ordinance No. 1071 which ordinance would prohibit use of steel - jawed, leghold traps within the City, but that beavers which are causing great problems in the City and in Hopkins can- not be captured with any other type of trap. He expressed concern about amend- ing the ordinance but emphasized that the nuisance must be abated. Mrs. Nancy Nelson, 5854 Creek Valley Road, said that she represented a group of people who Q are very concerned about the- possible amendment to the ordinance and recalled Q that Mr. David Johnson of the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources had suc- cessfully used the Bailey live trap for over 20 years and that her group would - be glad to buy traps for the City.or find some that could be borrowed. Mr. Bruce Moss of St. Croix, Wisconsin offered to loan some live traps to the CLty. Mr. James Melcowski, Director of the Dodge Nature Center, said that he would take two traps and members of the Wild Life Nature Preserve group said that they would take five traps. Mr. John Vadnais, Area Enforcement Officer for the Department of Natural Resources said that he also has two Bailey traps but that he does not believe that they will be effective. He added that it will be difficult to eliminate an entire beaver colony. It was generally decided that the City will work with members of the Wild Life group in the use of the Bailey trap but that if it is not satisfactory, other action will need to L•e taken. No formal action was taken. TRACY AVENUE LIFT STATION REPAIR BID AWARDED. Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of two bids for labor and appurtenances necessary to assist the Sewer Department replace pumps at the Tracy Ave. Lift Station. Tabulation showed Horwitz Mech- anical low bidder at $1,750.00 and G. L. Contracting, at $2,324.00. Council- man Richards' motion was seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt for award to reco;a- mended loci bidder, Horwitz :Mechanical for $1,750.00. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Van Valkenburg Nays: None :Motion carried. INSTALLATION OF 300 LINEAL FEET OF 36" C.M.P. FOR WILLI ?_>M WAILD'r ?UL I.E: ?TS PARK EID AWARDED. Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of two bids received for intallati.cn of 200 lineal feet cf 36" C.2M.P. to be supplied by the City of Edina as a part of the Storm Sewer for William Wardwell Lewis Park. Tabulation showed C.L. Contracting, inc., lost bidder at $1,700 and Matt Bullock Contracting Co., Inc. at $2,240.00. Councilwoman Schmidt's motion for award to recommended low bidder, G. L. Contracting, was seconded by Councilman Pichards. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Van Valkenburg Nays: Norse Motion carried. L'DEN PRAIRIE -EDINA SCHOOL DISTRICT BOUNDARY CHANGE P 20110SAL NOTED. wa.^, advised of a M-.earing to bu held on Jul.y 31, 1979. ac 10:30 a.m. in -_-ha County u.rd Room GovernirnnL Center -or t`a transfer o; properry i.0 3raea_tr H'iils 7, 3, 9, an,! 10th AJd_tinas fro -: Edc,:t Praici,. Indepcndeut "choo.l District. 272 Lu Edina School uiStl:iLL 27:. ;:o action was talcen. IN RA -CITY 311S 01'T.R4T TON SC'- TrEr,TLP. DT: ;('US::ZD. , Mi:. 11osl.an,i %al icri atLtmiL'iou :.,, a mciaoran;ili.: from Mr. liotmint re ardio;; :,u:;sLbilit­ of up :r:;Li an i.IItr;l -C1 7 but; service. The ier.;o stated that ;uol l taku apr.ru:•.Lm,italy 6i:. months to i,:Tit•mect a f;ti.rLy_ ��li p.l,nnr.cil pro •,ei : :.1 :n::i ::L!:o called atL-rtinn ro Lhe ^.as well n:; 1a... :,int iC 'i!..I _o: ;L itp :,r :tt -au :1y :GUO to c700 nor wet.t: La cper :.Le v;] a- ile :4 :C :Nll , �)) •,..• Lo 224 I I., 1'ii' Ayes: Bredesen, Courtney, Richards, S:h.•nidt, V:an ;'alkenburg Nays: None Motion carried. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMLIITTEE MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 14, 1979, REVIEWED. Councilman Courtney's motion accepting Section C of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of November 14, 1979, and approving the following actions was seconded by Council - woman Schmidt: 1) Continuance of existing signing ( "NO PARKING SUNDAYS, 7 A.M. - 1P.M.') along the North side of Olinger Blvd. from Tracy Ave. to 5900 Olinger Blvd. until such time as residents request their removal; 2) Installation of a STOP sign at the intersection of Timber Ridge Road and McCauley Trail; 3) That further requests for street lighting at intersections continue to be hand- led by the Engineering Department;. 4) Installation of NO PARKING signs for users of the Recycling Center at 5121 Brookside Ave.; 5) That Mr. V. P. Mag- nuson, 4909 Browndale Ave., be advised by the Engineering Department that the Traffic Safety Committee recommends installation of a guard rail in front of his house to keep cars from leaving the roadway and driving on the grassy right -of- way. Motion was seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt. Ayes: Bredesen, Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Van Valkenburg Nays: None Motion carried. SERENDIPITY BEER LICENSES APPROVED. Mr. Rosland called Council's attention to the applications of Serendipity, located in the Biltmore Motel, for an On -Sale Beer License and an Off -Sale Beer License. The Clerk advised that she had received a letter from Mr. and Mrs. Merrill B. Webert, 5128 William Ave., and three telephone calls objecting to issuance of the licenses and two calls from People indicating that they had no objections. Councilman Richards said that he had received a call from Mr. Arthur Buffington of Villa Way, opposing the issuance of the licenses. Councilman Bredesen's motion approving the two licenses was seconded by Councilmay Courtney. Ayes: Bredesen, Courtney, Van Valkenburg Nays: Richards, Schmidt Motion carried. HENNEPIN E`IERGEWCY COAMUNICATIONS ORGANIZATION (HECO) 911 PLAN PARTICIPATION APPROVED. I1_. Rosland recalled that action on the Hennepin Emergency ci:.ta Cr- . .. Co. m munica- gei:ati _ . "nv-CC Dl. h _ bte^ _.^t nued f xT November 5, 1Q 79, go that the Council would have an opportunity for further study and advised that participation in the plan had been recommended by Chiefs Buresh and Swanson. No comments being heard, Councilman Courtney offered the following resolution and moves its adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 403 require that each county submit a final 911 plan to the Department of Administration by December 15, 1979, and each county shall have an operational 911 telephone system by December 15, 1982; and WHEREAS, the Hennepin Emergency Communications Organization (HECO) has prepared a final "911 Plan for Hennepin County" that has been submitted to the Hennepin County Board r.f Commissioners; and WHEREAS, the rules promulgated by the Department of Administration which govern the design and operation of 911 systems in Minnesota require a certification by the County Board that the final 911 plan meets the reeds of the safety agencies whose services will be available by dialing 911; and WHEREAS, representatives of the City of Edina have participated in the develop- ment of the final "911 Plan for Hennepin County "; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina hereby certifies that the final "911 Plan for'Hennepin County" meets the needs of the safety agencies whose services are available within the City of Edina; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Edina recommends that the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners approve the final "911 Plan for Hennepin County" as sub- mitted by HECO. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Van Valkenburg Nsys: None, Resolution adopted. ROLLAND ROLL NOTICE OF CLAIM NOTED. Mr. Rosland advised Council of a claim of Rolland Roll :1gairst the City of Edina and that the claim has been referred to the insurance companies and the City Attorney, No action was taken. TRAPPING ORDINANCE NOS. 1071 -A1 AND - :L^ c:?. :''LP. versa„ READINr, Rowland recalled that on JL1 19-79, Oniinancc th!;. ! -l. and 1_222 -.12 had „received Firs, ReaLiIn;, but that, S i __ t...... .. : :' . LhL: l;,'S ...tco:"tcd to usz l traps to catch he :n,cr,;. I!. r. p rt ;' ti :. �n i:: ce. trc:,.•cr -i : •i and 11/ 9/7'J 225 that there is now •i pro5.len: with muskrats on Lakeview Drive as well as with beavers in thv Pn mela Park area Of LI« City. 'Ir. Cal R. Colvin, 5920 Halifax Ave., spokesman for Halifax Avenue residents, said that beavers have caused the area to look like "tornado alley ", that wild life is being destroyed by the flooding conditions and that there have been two power outages because trees have fallen on power lines. He emphasized that the condition is dangerous for children and requested that the City clean up the fallen trees in the area. ..-Mr. ,Ray-Buckman, 5908 Halifax Ave., said that he has seen as many as four beavers at once and joined Mr. Colvin in urging the City to pass ordinances . which would permit trapping to alleviate the nuisance. Speaking in opposition to the proposed ordinances was Mrs. Nancy Nelson, 5854 Creek Valley Road, who commended Council's past action and urged that the ordinance amendments not be adopted. She suggested that the City continue to use live traps and that the animals either be relocated to a zoo or that they be euthanized. Mr. James Mulkowski, Executive Director of Dodge Nature Center, suggested that only one licensed trapper be retained by the City, but that he could not do the work him- self. The Mayor advised that he also shared the concern. for the animals but that residents must have their rights protected, and that the City Manager should be able to use his discretion as to what type of trap to use. Mrs. Nelson suggested that the ordinance amendment should provide that the work must be done by a licensed trapper, that only nuisance animals are to be trapped, that trapping 00 must be done for non - commercial purposes and that the pelts should be turned over to the City or the Department of Natural Resources and not be sold. No further discussion being heard, Councilman Bredesen then offered the following ordinance Q for Second Reading and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 1071 -A1 Q AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1071 Q TO ALLOW TRAPPING BY THE CITY OF EDINA AND OTHERS WITH PERMISSION OF THE CITY MANAGER THE CITY COUNCIL Or THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 3 of Ordinance No. 1071 is hereby amended to read as follows: "Sec. 3. Trapping Prohibited. Trapping -within the City of Edina is pro- hibited, except that trapping may be done by the City of Edina, or may be done under its direction, or may be done by any other governmental agency or departmer ' with. the - written permission of the City Manager, or may be done by any =erson wi: 11a appin; is . ' cd by the Eta`c cf P1i- ^ ^ ^�`a and ith .te .. tt2r. permission of the City Manager. All trapping is to be in accordance with State Law. Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Councilman Richards. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Van Valkenburg hays: None, with all members expressing concern for the welf re of animals. Ordinance adopted. ATTEST: yor City Clerk Councilman Bredesen thereupon offered Ordinance No. 1222 -A2 and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE N0. 1222 -A2 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1222 TO ALLOW TRAPPING IN PUBLIC PARKS BY THE CITY OF EDINA, AND OTHERS WITH PERMISSION OF THE CITY PLkNNAGER Section i. The last sentence o> subparagraph '(b) of Sec. 8 of Ordinance. No. 1222 is hereby amended to read as follows: "The prohibition of this subparagraph (b) and in subparagraph (a) of this Sec. 8 shall not apply to trapping by any means or methods done by the City .of Edina, or done under its direction. or done by any other governmental agency cr department :aith the written permission of the City ^1aaager, or done by any person with a valid trapping license issued by the State of Minnesota and with the written permission of rine City Manager. All tr2ppins: is to be in accord- ance with State law. Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Councilman Richards. Rollcail: Ayes: Bredesen, Courtney, Richards, 5ch midt, Vnn 1alkenburg %ays: None Ordinance adapted. a British glomerate, iers, Michb srnie Hartman er, were ,s A owner - er the newly hip New Can - Page 1C. Washington, D.C. 'Syrian officials have notified the United States to expect the release of another U.S. hostage by Friday, bar- ring unforeseen circumstances and delays of the sort that accompanied Robert Polhill's release, an adminis- tration source said Monday. avid Brewster ■ rre51Qt$1 It 00011 IJ largo 1y tl. v ..... .. -,� he's trading something for the release of hostages. Page 4A. The source said he did not know Also yesterday, Iran's foreign minis whether the alert involves one of the ter said that he expected a second two Americans still held by the Is- captive to be freed in the "next few lamic Jihad for the Liberation of Pal- days." estine, the group that released Polhill Sunday. Other militant Islamic However, he coupled his prediction groups hold five other Americans. with a hint that future hostage re- rest ice arrested nine protesters Monday and sprayed chem- thers after they blocked traffic near the Hennepin County ator in downtown Minneapolis. Story on page. 1B. Helium convicted of 2nd - degree murder By Paul Gustafson and Joe Kimball federal ad prison escaped sentence from wand Staff Writers . could face additional federal charges After five days of intense delibera- tion, a Ramsey County jury found Randy Lee Helium guilty of second - degree murder and three other crimes Monday night, but acquitted him of first - degree murder in the shooting death of Scott Brainard at a Roseville bar. Hellum, 33, faces a maximum of 40 years in prison for the convictions. In addition, he still must serve a 27 -year Helium continued on page 9A for that escape and weapon viola- tions. Jurors apparently had little trouble returning guilty verdicts for attempt- ed murder and assault after Helium admitted he shot at bar manager Tim Lyke. And Helium admitted he tried to flee the bar by holding patron Matthew Uzpen at gunpoint. But it 1982 — and now believed by U.S. officials to be dead — and 400 Leba- nese and Palestinians, including u prominent Shiite religious leader, who are under Israeli control. Meanwhile, Polhill was reported by Hostages continued on page 8A Edina pet rule curbed Court calls noise ordinance By Margaret Zack Staff Writer An Edina ordinance that prohibits pet owners from keeping animals that disturb neighbors has been over- turned by the Minnesota Court of Appeals, which ruled it is unconstitu- tionally vague. In a decision to be filed today, the court said the 1981 ordinance left residents to guess whether their dogs' barking disturbed others. The appeal stemmed from a citation given Edina resident Roger Dreher, Who was cited last August after police were balled twice about a barking dog. He appealed his conviction and $30 fine. According to the court the first occasion a police officer sat in his Randy Helium fn rl i I too vague second complaint was made two days later and the same officer stopped near Dreher's house and listened io the dog bark. for 10 minutes. The officer testified' at Dreher's trial that the dog barked and made ''a howling or whining -type noise." He also said that the "frequency and consistency were disturbing" and the dog barked about every 10 seconds car about 50 yards from Dreher's i Pets continued on page 6A house and listened to the dog bark. A ... ' esday /Apra 24/199b /Star Tribune tge IA impact on minorities is greatest, use involved in the anti -drug ef- ts agree that the system is not isciously designed against blacks. vas a black judge who sentenced a ck man in Los Angeles to life prisonment for possession of 5' /2 ms of cocaine, they point out. wouldn't call it a conscious con - racy," said Dr. Barry Krisberg, �sident of the National Council on ime and Delinquency. "I don't be- ve that these black mayors and lice chiefs and other officials have out to make war on their own ople." ie officials say, however, that the sponse has been rooted in the belief at blacks are the major purveyors I drugs in America. The news medi- '§ stark portrayals of the drug- relat- d violence and crime most preva- ent in black neighborhoods has Dlayed a significant role in that per- ception. Me kinds of visuals you have on tsltvision, where most people get ' Neil news, are shots of black people *.a drug- market area," said Bob Witt. tor of the Center for blic Affairs, a Washing - anization that analyzes ge. "That reinforces the it's mostly a black flies get the additional Mounted, residents also e2 of increased law en- 41t grey hadn't counted turps, searches, ar- Mrassment. But the police ef- they y affect civil more said Pets Continued from page lA for 10 minutes. Only the officer, not the complaining neighbors, was called to testify at Dreher's trial. The three judge appeals court panel said the ordinance did not meet stan- dards of definiteness. Dreher's com- pliance with it hinged on the officer's personal sense of annoyance over the dog's barking. The judges wondered about the meaning of the words in the ordi- nance that set standards by forbid- ding animals "which shall by any noise disturb the peace and quiet of any persons in the vicinity." "Does that include several- month- old babies which may easily be dis- turbed and cry at any strange sound? Does it include the elderly or anyone who is extremely sensitive and claims to be disturbed by any noise above the normal hum of conversa- tion? Does it include persons who, because of their love of pets, have an extremely high tolerance for barking dogs and mewing cats, or do we go by the standards of those who strongly dislike any pet within a residential area ?" wrote Judge R.A. Randall for the panel. The city had argued on appeal that the phrase "disturb the peace and quiet" has a well- accepted, generally understood meaning. The city looked to three cases where convictions stemming from violations of similar ordinances on disturbing the peace were upheld. Those cases involved Vietnam protesters who disrupted the Aquatennial parade, an individ- ual who berated a clergyman during a church service and refused to leave, and protesters who blocked entrances and damaged property at a restau- rant. The court said those cases were dif- ferent from the Edina situation be- cause they involved clear, observ- able, deviant conduct. In addition to the ordinance not put- ting Dreher on notice of what con- duct is prohibited, it invites arbitrary enforcement, said Randall. "Because the city failed to introduce any evidence from the original com- plainants who reported appellant's dog barking, the question whether appellant violated the ordinance de- pended entirely on the officer's threshold of annoyance," the court said. In reversing Dreher's conviction, the' court said the case was very similar to one decided recently by the Wash- ington Supreme Court. The Minne- sota court said it was adopting the reasoning of that case, which said that because the ordinance turned on the neighbors' level of tolerance or intolerance for barking, an average person of common intelligence could not determine how much noise was prohibited. Power failures Vandalism was suspected in two power failures that left about 92,000 people without power for six hours, Pacific Gas & Electric said Monday. Residents of Santa Cruz and Watson- ville, Calif., were affected by the fail- ures, caused by damage to power poles. tI V Ul V Q 1 r Your Secretary's Day! Wednesday, April 25, remember the one who remembers everything by choosing from an array of elegant "thank you's ": pearlized ceramic Keep- sake Boxes holding rich Truffles, sleek white lac- quer Ballotins with luscious assortments of Milk and Dark chocolates, Gold Ballotins blossoming with silky roses and more. You're sure to find the O D I VAS, perfect gift at Godiva. So not only, will we make �G . ,your secretary's day brighter —we'll make your Secretary's Day easier, too! Crystal Court IDS Center, 80 So. 8th Street, Minneapolis 338 -6800 i L 'fie uri 0 0 d P i REQUEST .FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor and Council Members FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director Park and Recreation Department VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: may 4, 1990 AGENDA ITEM yll.A. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Construction of protection wall for lesson tee.' Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Jackson Landscape 1. $8,970 2. Palani Construction 2. $12,575 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5 RECOMMENDED ,QUOTE OR. BID: Jackson Landscape $8,970 GENERAL INFORMATION: Construction of a.wall to protect'the lesson tee area at the.North end,of Braemar Golf Course Driving Range. The Driving Range North end.fence will be removed to give extra length to Driving Range. The new wall will: .1. stop rolling balls up on the lesson tee area, and 2. protect.slope area of'the tee 340 fee of timber wall ranging from 6 inches to 3 feet back to 6 inches depending on'.topography. and slope of tee, within the 340 feet. nature. Dwartmeat The Recommended bid is X". within' budget not w Kenneth Roslanii, City — Manager Director N° REQUEST FOR PURCHASE a O: TO: Mayor and Council Members FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director Park and Recreation Department VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: May 3, 1990 AGENDA ITEM V T T _ R _ ITEM DESCRIPTION: 15 new golf cars with 10 car trade -in. Companv Amount of Quote or Bid 1. GOLF CAR MIDWEST 1. $34,695. 2. VERSATILE VEHICLES 2. $35,950 3. MINNESOTA GOLF CARS, INC.(does not meet 3. 4. specifications) 4 $31,925 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: GOLF CAR MIDWEST $34,695 GENERAL INFORMATION: Low bid is rejected because it did not meet specifications. The low bidder is aware of not meeting specifications, but still wanted to bid. Basic reason for bid rejection: 1. Does not meet self adjusting brake system., 2. self adjusting electric accelerator control does not meet specifications. The Recommended bid is within budget na r 0 A. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor and Council Members FROM:Bob Kojetin, Director Park and Recreation Department VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE. May 4, 1990 AGENDA ITEM VII. C. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Ice resurfacer Companv Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Becker Arena Products, Inc. 1. $47,938 2. Frank J. Zamboni & Co., Inc. 2. $50,530 3. 3. 4. 4 S. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Reject Bids GENERAL INFORMATION: Not within budget for first phase Centennial Equipment. "Si Si ature The Recommended bid is within budget not within 4Wg0t Department i 0-'i.1 Cl-'Lq= Finance Director �� nneth Rosland, C' Manager REQUEST FOR, PURCHASE TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: GORDON L. HUGHES, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER, VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00 DATE MAY 7, 1990 AGENDA ITEM VII.D ITEM DESCRIPTION: Goose Management Contract Companv Amount of Quote or Bid 1' University of Minnesota $ 21,000 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. no other bids 4 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: University of.Minnesota $ 21,000 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is !a three year,contract for goose removal.from City lakes and ponds. It is-a continuation of the program which has been in place for the past. three years. Signature ,) Depa ment 1 The Recommended bid is within budget not within b get _16hn Wallin; F' ance Dir Kenneth Rosland City Manager A. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: GORDON L. HUGHES VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 DATE: APRIL 16, 1990 AGENDA ITEM VII.E ITEM DESCRIPTION: Company 1. MINNETONKA WEED EATERS 2. MIDWEST AQUA CARE 3. 4. 5. MILL POND WEED HARVESTING Amount of Quote or &d 1. $ 7,840.00 2. 8,768.00 3. 4. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Recommend low bid to Minnetonka Weed Eaters at $7,840.00. GENERAL INFORMATION: The proposals are for the annual aquatic weed harvesting of the Mill Pond. Signature The Recommended bid is x — within budget not 4J r,- - Kenneth Rosland, &yy Manager `T7A..NIT REQUEST UEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor and.Council.Members FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director Park and Recreation Department VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000 DATE: May 4, 1990 AGENDA ITEM Vi l . F ITEM DESCRIPTION: Rework peat of #2 fairway at. Braemar Colf Course Company Amount-of Quote or &d 1• Perkins Landscape 1 $5,808.. 2• Matt Bullock,Construction 2. $12,513 3. g 4.. 4 5• 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BD:. Perkins Landscape . GENERAL INFORMATION: Rework of 5 acres of peat area between Braemar Boulevard.and #2 fairway, from .#2 tee long North edge df fairway on both sides.of pond up to road and behind #2 green. Grading and seeding, this does not include fabric. Si ture Department The Recommended bid is within budget not within budget .. Wallin, Fin nce Director Kenneth Rosland, City Manager 40 �• RPOM'DO 4 age REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: GORDON L. HUGHES ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER Date: MAY 7, 1990 Subject: TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTS UPDATE Recommendation: Agenda Item # VIII.A Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance FE Discussion Continued from April 16, 1990 regular Council meeting. Info /Background: ��v9lv��r'lr\ o •r -\ `l Cn REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: GORDON L. HUGHES ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER Dater APRIL 16, 1990 Subject: TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTS UPDATE Recommendation: Info/Background- Agenda Item # VII.B Consent (F7 Information Only F7 Mgr . Recommends To HRA To Council Action ❑ Motion _ Resolution Ordinance 0 Discussion As you know, on April 2, 1990, the City Council approved the establishment of Tax Increment Financing districts at 44th & France, Valley View & Wooddale and 70th Street and Cahill Road. Staff is currently preparing the documents necessary to request certification of these districts by Hennepin County. Based on the Council's action of April 2, 1990, we understand that projects and proposals associated with these districts should be generated by the property owners and the development community rather than the staff. Therefore, we have not initiated any discussions with property owners or developers concerning projects in these three areas. The Council, however, may consider the continuation of dialogue between the City and property owners which we would do through Peter Meyers. Whichever direction the Council wishes, we want to make sure the staff understands Council direction. We of course will meet with and respond to any thoughts that property owners or the development communities have. 350 PA AVENUE NEW YORE, NEW YORK 10022 (212)415 -9200 1330 CONNECTICUT AVENUE. N. W. WASHINGTON, D. C. 20036 (202)857 -0700 3 ORACECHURCH STREET LONDON EC3V OAT, ENGLAND 01- 929 -3334 36,RUE TRONCHET 75009 PARIS, FRANCE 01- 42- 66 -59 -49 FAH EAST FINANCE CENTER - - - -HO1NO HONG - 852 -5- 8612555 Mr. Gordon Hughes City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 DOI3SEY & WHITNEY A P�zRSNiY INCLQDfNO PROFESS- CO-ONS 2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 (612 ) 340-2600 TELEX 29 -0605 FAX (612) 340 -2868 JEROME P. Gns IGAN (614 340-2= May 7,1990 Re:. Effect of 1990 Tax Increment Amendments on 44th & France, Valley View & Wooddale and 70th & Cahill TIF Districts. Dear Gordon: 340 FIRST NATIONAL BANE BUILDING ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 55903 (507) 288 -3156 315 FIRST NATIONAL BANE BUILDING WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 (612)475 -0373 1200 FIRST INTERSTATE CENTER BILLINOS, MONTANA 59103 (406)252 -3800 201 DAVIDSON BUILDING GREAT FALLS, MONTANA 59401 (406)727 -3632 127 EAST FRONT STREET MISSOULA, MONTANA 59802 (406) 721 -6025 On April 2nd, the City Council approved the establishment of three tax increment districts in the City.covering the areas at 44th & France, Valley View & Wooddale and 70th & Cahill. The 44th & France district was qualified as a redevelopment district, and the Valley View & Wooddale and 70th & Cahill districts were qualified as economic development districts. On April 20, the City filed a request with Hennepin Council to certify the original tax capacity of the districts. A major consideration' of the City Council in creating these districts was to be grandfathered from additional restrictions on tax increment financing which were then being considered by the Legislature. The Legislature eventually enacted these additional restrictions in the Tax Bill passed on the final day of the session. These restrictions, among other things, eliminate the ability of the City to create economic development tax increment districts for commercial areas (such as the Valley View & Wooddale and 70th & Cahill districts), and tighten the requirements for creating redevelopment tax increment districts by eliminating the provision under which the 44th & France district qualified as a redevelopment district. Generally the additional restrictions are effective for tax increment districts for which certification was requested after April 30, 1990. However, for DOKSEY & WHITNEY Page -2- Mr. Gordon Hughes May 7,1990 districts for which the request for certification was filed during April 1990 (such as the 44th & France, Valley View & Wooddale and 70th & Cahill districts), the bill provides that the amendments are effective for such districts if by June 1, 1991 none of the following actions are taken: (i) a development agreement is entered into by the City for a site in the district, (ii) bonds were issued to finance project costs or (iii) the City acquires property in the district after April 1 (the statute does not reference April 1 of what year, but I assume the intent is April 1, 1990). The effect of this effective date provision on the 44th & France, Valley View & Wooddale and 70th & Cahill districts, is that unless one of the conditions set forth above is met for such district by June 1, 1991, such district will no longer qualify as a tax increment district after such date. It is important to note that the test will be applied to each district separately, and the failure to satisfy the condition for one district will not affect another district where one of the conditions has been satisfied by June 1, 1991. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call me. Yours truly, o P. hGillilga JPG:cmn - - cc: Tom Erickson ti A. o e t Ict Cn J • f��Rronw�bJ • lase REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER Agenda Item ## VIII.B � From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: MAY 4, 1990 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: DOG LICENSE RENEWAL ❑ To Council PROCESS Action IF I Motion ❑ Resolution ❑I Ordinance ; ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Info /Background: At the April 16, 1990 Council Meeting, the Council deferred discussion and action on the dog license renewal process because of the late hour. The packet data from that meeting is attached. i o e J RRJM' � J j REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From. ZEN ROSLAND, :TANAGER Date: APRIL 13, 1990 . Subject. DOG LICENSING RENEWAL PROCESS Recommendation: Agenda Item I# VII.0 i Consent Information Only I Mgr. Recommends To HRA To Council I Action Xi Motion Resolution Ordinance Discussion i Council approval of dog license mail -out renewal process. Info /Ba ckground: At previous Council meetings the subject of mailing out renewal notices for dog licenses has been discussed and as requested by the Council background information on dog licensing was provided together with estimated costs for mailing out renewal notices. (Copies attached.) I concur with Chief Swanson's recommendation that the City instigate dog license renewals through a mail -out process. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager FROM: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Dog Licensing DATE: March 26, 1990 The attached "draft" form is provided in accordance with the Council's request. The form would be sent out in November anticipating the December 31st license expiration. A letter acknowledging the license renewal would be sent to those who choose to use the mailing format. As recommended in my memo to you on March 16, 1990, I would encourage the use of any unanticipated revenue to identify and license currently unlicensed dogs. Conservative estimates are that the number of unlicensed dogs exceeds the total that are or have been licensed. As many as 1500 unlicensed dogs may exist in Edina. To identify unlicensed dogs, the following examples might be implemented. * Authorize veterinarians to sell licenses at the time of initial rabies vaccinations. * Have veterinarians hand out the attached renewal card at the time of initial rabies vaccinations. * Set up vaccination /licensing clinics at reduced rates. * Request veterinarians to provide a list of vaccinated dogs. * Discuss a "life time" license. * Discuss "free licensing" of cats and dogs that have been vaccinated and spayed or neutered. If you have questions or comments, please contact me. Craig Swanson Chief of Police { M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth E. Rosland FROM: Craig G. Swanson SUBJECT: Doz Licensing DATE: March 16, 1990 At the March 5, 1990, Council meeting, questions arose regarding notification to dog owners-for license renewal. Facts about licensing include: * Rationale for licensing: - A means of identifying stray or lost dogs and establishing proof of ownership. - A mechanism for assuring that animals are vaccinated against rabies. a Total licenses issued: 1989 - 570 1988 - 585 1987 - 629 * Renewals: 55% previously licensed 34% licensed during preceding year 11% never licensed before • Estimates of the dog population- - Approximately 1,000 dogs licensed during 1984 -1989. - 60 %+ of dogs are never licensed. - Estimated 2,500 dog population in Edina. • Renewal mailout cost (1,000 addresses): printed mailer - $300.00 postage - 140.00 labels - 28.00 staff time (mailout only) - _60.00 $528.00 I recommend a renewal mailout. It will generate a larger percentage of renewals. Revenue from the renewals will generate $2,000 to $4,000. I further recommend that this revenue be used to attack the larger problem of unlicensed dogs. If you have questions or comments, please contact me. CRAIG SWANSON CHIEF F POLICE HELP US HELP YOU. IL-Ul OR. BRNG Lei YOUR APPUCAMON TOD Ul j All dogs over 6 months of age must be licensed with the City. All licenses a :pine December 31st of the year in which they are issued. The license mg you receive must -.e won by your dog at all times. Licensing provides the City with a method of Lhat dos 3r° proper v3CC:.'la:ed �g�': St rabies. _dditionally, CUQ o%mers receive t:emendousvalue nom a ilcerse :n authonties make e': err effort, to r eturn lost dogs to their homes when they are we:.z ng a cu.reat 'license. All other does are a spored to the animal shelter ir. 31oorningtan where impounding and boarding `eels are charged.. — NSI IUMO`S I ter.; .:s sp;i�e�an a Ctg i'.]:l —'P. :n= • .- log Lm-J& (:Ity of ?den ?rzr a. . JLa hmne. 4.14 ia>r:::'leeae inao�ie ;:.00 .'x tact V; :3 ae orsac -NUkC deela p3ti-Ank :a cay I E_an ?=-m I i . DOG LICENSE aPPUCATION C-w-ners name :Address Home prune Dugs nacre (:st) Uor Breed Szc: M ❑ F - Rabies Tag d D=e Vet Clinic �' ;'s acme (? ^.c:) orecd _ _.. '4 C�iur _ Sex: `I Q c C: — – -��- ?- Rabies Tz9 Due Vat Clinic — LUNRUN T NOTICE — A;,;dC== sell aoe W uaepted wig: out mmpiete ribes riewmLim isdanuliott 7= infamadaa :s on )W thadnre of vimmanoa Ptan == 7w m Clinic if necawary. e A. e tA • `NCbHpOM� °J • lase REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item ## • C From: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER Consent u Information Only U Date: 11AY 4, 1990 Mgr. Recommends El To HRA Subject: REQUEST FOR VACATION OF n To Council DUGGAN PLAZA (REYES). Action r--� I x Motion ! Resolution Ordinance Discussion Recommendation: Because of the complexity of the ownership of the small island and adjoining strips of land if the City were to vacate the properties, staff would recommend that the request be denied and that Mr. Reyes be so informed by letter. Info /Background: At the meeting of April 16, 1990, the Council acknowledged receipt of a letter from E. David Reyes, 701 4th Avenue South, Minneapolis, requesting the City to vacate a small center island in Duggan Plaza (copy attached). The matter was referred to staff for further study and recommendation. Attorney Erickson has researched the history and ownership of the property if the city were to grant the vacation. A copy of his findings dated April '23, 1990, is also attached. It is my recollection that a similar request was made some years ago following the construction of Highway 100 and was turned down for similar reasons. v 701 4th Avenue South Suite 350 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 April 10, 1990 City Clerk Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Counsel Members: I am requesting that a small portion of land be eliminated from the tax rolls and put on for public listing. The current property identification number is 0411621340061, referring to a center island and small lot located east of Danens Drive on the center line of Duggan Plaza. I am interested in purchasing the lot and building a home on it. Please provide me with any information on how to purchase the lot from the City. My home address is: E. David Reyes 616 West 53rd Street, #506 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55419 Telephone: 612/824 -6058 Thank you very much for your cooperation. EDR:tk Sincerely, E. DAVID REY'ES Telephone: (612) 348 -5967 TDD: (612) 348 -5861 GOVT LOT 4�o.,P�° . M 2i 90.6/ Res. 920.0 ` ev � O _ i131� m ti q0 I • �� ILIA am g a .35 50 35 F,.b. ;�60 `R 1 al .A `I �1 . • t•! i . r Q .N ��. " �1 �I jib H• « fDA� ,•,. p 52 104 0 /a0 . J 90 d0 94 of i rWL 1 m y ( 46 11 _ co 90 i O�BO li/1 u. r �• tj OD ti O IC lMr 9 _ � � 37 M� iZ K 3L� � � y7, Le 2 �N hp0: y • ;• - ti><� 3S so ZL6 4i � t, °! �� 9c• -,' - / �$1- � � ` •V = �,' ��lr) -� e•� 4 rte\ / N t•'lyy i : •p0' 0 s o 57 Jr�s ti� q1 (T.q� :: ' _ i- - - - �'}''• -,s:� 44� o %, � ♦`° y' •" �5 � ��• S/ ` °, (q /•P 0. `� ar - an v40 t3 yp - oI/ ^�. �4I52 r 5 LD CA N 1w : .1G_). N N �- ►1j 7f� 130 ti 1 •' "' f %l.S ^• '.. CY In UF C�i /� Ob v i4 4 �J`I�•g• ° u ry ''Qp N ° o� ff0• 16 . •s q0 , _v1110• 9i' rV j6/ � M O) 1 ep .�..p J,y \�� �` y / eo. + Fs�``. eo iii r • 3 ? op .ti. .� _ tv ,� off. 0l �'�� �♦ - Iii �� 0Q•ts \raj/ •� in X1'1, \ `• �01 �,ii l � � .,w�/�,�'�� ♦ � 1 .h • 7f �, ^ �� �• "'� ",jt� ..s • • � 7�r' e`oe� ♦` ^� . � 1��r/ .� Ib6 j; !% ^ ��J OAT e�b 0.``k• ^° fl �•Ow .f;ZZ.� -s' ^ ♦h, O tiw� e - let 350 PARE AVENUE NEW YORK, NEW YORE 10022 (212)415 -9200 1330 CONNECTICUT AVENUE, N. W. WASHINGTON, D. C. 20036 (202)857 -0700 3 GRACECHURCH STREET LONDON BC3V OAT, ENGLAND 01- 929-3334 36, RUE TRONCHET 75009 PARIS, FRANCE 0I- 42- 66 -59 -49 FAR EAST FINANCE CENTER HONG KONG 882 -5- 8612555 Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland City Manager City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 DORSEY & WHITNEY A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROPESSIONAL CORPORATIONS 2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 (612) 340 -2600 TELEX 29 -0605 FAX (612) 340-2668 THOMAS S. ERICKSON, P. A. (612) 340 -2659 April 23, 1990 Re: Request for Vacation of Duggan Plaza Dear Mr. Rosland: 340 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 55903 (507) 288 -3136 315 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING WAYZATA, MINNBSOTA 55391 (612) 475-0373 1200 FIRST INTERSTATE CENTER BILLINGS, MONTANA 59103 (406)252 -3000 201 DAVIDSON BUILDING GREAT PALLS, MONTANA 59401 (406)727 -3632 127 EAST FRONT STREET MISSOULA, MONTANA 59502 (406) 721 - 6025 A Mr. E. David Reyes, by letter dated April 10, 1990, to the City Clerk, has requested that a small center island in Duggan Plaza and lying east of Danens Drive be vacated. You have asked me to inquire into the ownership of that property in the event of vacation. The whole of the Street known as Duggan Plaza came out of the plat of Brookview Heights 1st Addition. This means that if the street were vacated the whole of the vacated would be owned by the property owners to the north of the street. There are two lots lying north of the street and lying east of Danens Drive and west of Highway 100. The most westerly lot is privately owned. The most easterly lot is owned by the State of Minnesota having acquired it in connection with the Highway 100 improvements. In the middle of Duggan Plaza, and east of Danens Drive is an island. It is unclear from the plat whether or not that island was dedicated as a part of the street of Duggan Plaza itself. Apparently, it was concluded by the taxing authorities that it was not a part of the dedicated street because it was taxed and eventually forfeited to the State of Minnesota for non - payment of taxes. In turn, the.State of Minnesota conveyed it to the City of Edina to be used as a park and open space. Should the street be vacated and the City no longer need or want the small island DoRSEY & WHITNEY Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland April 23, 1990 Page 2 for the public purpose for which it was granted to the City, then the City should reconvey the property back to the State of Minnesota. If not reconveyed, it will - automatically revert pursuant to the terms of the deed and applicable statutes. Therefore, if the street is vacated, it would appear appropriate for the City to reconvey the small island back to the State of Minnesota. Based on the foregoing, the end result of a vacation and reconveyance by the City would be that the property owner to the north would own two 35 foot strips of land, one north and one south of the island in the middle of the street, and the State of Minnesota would own the island in the middle of the street. As we have previously discussed in other contexts, the County may well be willing to sell the island to the adjoining property owner, meaning the property owner to the north of the vacated street. I trust the foregoing is responsive to your inquiry. If you have any further questions, please let me know. Very truly yours, -y . �� Thomas S. Eric son TSE:amo d r /art A. '►?r�� O REPORT /RECOMMENDATION T0: Edina City Council From: Craig G. Swanson Chief of Police Date: May 7, 1990 Subject: Court of Appeals decision regarding Edina City ordinance, 312, Animal Control Recommendation: Info /Background: Agenda Item # VIII.]; Consent ❑ Information Only Fx] Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion The attached Minnesota Court of Appeals decision was handed down on April 17, 1990. The staff, in conjunction with the City Prosecutor, are researching various alternatives to this decision and will report their recommendations to the City Council on June 18, 1990. i ME—DIA .AND COU14SEL ARE PROHIBITED FROM MAMIG THIS) OPRI IOi,W8r', KR'F, ikH ±0R TO 12:01 VNMCO2RT1'-IDE'IIk'PB S A P P E a�MT� Ljg �v9 I Hennepin County Randall, Judge City of Edina, Hubert H. Humphrey, III Attorney General - Respondent, 200 Ford Building 117 University Avenue St. Paul, MN 55155 Marshall Halberg David J. McGee Thomsen, Nybeck Law Firm Edinborough Corporate Center E. 3300 Edinborough Way Edina, MN 55435 VS. Roger H. Dreher, Steven D. DeRuyter . Leonard, Street & Deinard Appellant. 150 South Fifth Street Suite 2300 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Filed April 24, 1990 . Office of Appellant Courts S Y L L A B U S City ordinance that prohibited owning an animal that "by any noise disturbs the peace and quiet of persons in the vicinity" did not provide adequate notice or adequate standards to prevent ± arbitrary enforcement and therefore violates due process of law. Reversed. Considered and decided by Randall, Presiding Judge, Foley, Judge, and Gardebring, Judge. 0 P I N I.0 IV RANDALL, Judge This is an appeal from judgment against appellant for violating a city ordinance that prohibits a person from keeping an animal which by any noise disturbs the peace and quiet of persons in -the vicinity. Appellant argues that the city ordinance denies him due process of law. We reverse. FACTS On August 14, 1989, an Edina community officer was dispatched by the police department to answer a citizen's complaint that a dog was barking at the house of appellant Roger Dreher. Upon reaching the house, the officer sat in his vehicle and from about 50 yards away listened to appellant's dog bark the officer left a warning citation and a copy Ordinance, Number 312, 5 29(j) (Dec. 2, 1981), No person owning, operating, having charge occupying any building or premises shall k+ allow to be kept any animal which shall by disturb the peace and quiet of any persons vicinity thereof. Before leaving, of-'Edina City which orovides: C-4 or ?eo or any noise in the Two days later another complaint was made about appellant's dog by a second individual. The same community officer stopped near appellant's house and listened for about 10 minutes while �a the dog barked. The officer testified that on this second occasion he could hear barking and also "a howling or whining type noise." The officer further testified that it was a higher frequency and the "frequency and consistency were disturbing." -2- A He testified that the dog barked about every 10 seconds for approximately 10 minutes. The officer then issued a formal citation to appellant for violating the Edina ordinance. At trial neither of the original complainants were called, and the city's case rested on solely on the officer's testimony. After trial to the court, appellant was convicted of violating the Edina ordinance and assessed a $30 fine, plus court costs. ISSUE Does Edina City Ordinance, Number 312, 9 29(j), as applied to appellant, violate due process of law? ANALYSIS Appellant asserts that Edina City Ordinance, :umber 312, 29(j), is unconstitutionally vague as applied to him and thereby deprives him of due process of law. The Edina ordinance must meet due process standards of definiteness under both the United States Constitution and the Minnesota Constitution. State v. Newstrom, 371 N.W.2d 525, 528 (Minn. 1985). Persons of common intelligence must not be left to guess at. the meaning of the ordinance nor differ as to its application. Id. The purposes of the void for vagueness doctrine are to put people on notice of what conduct is prohibited and, more importantly, to discourage arbitrary and discriminatory law enforcement. Kolender,v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352, 357 (1983). - 3 - When fundamental" rights are not involved, as here, vagueness challenges must be examined. in light of the defendant's actual conduct. State v. Becker, 351 N.W.2d 923, 925 (Minn. 1984). Appellant must show that the ordinance "lacks, specificity as to his own behavior and not as to some hypothetical situation." State v. Kager, 382 N.W.2d 287, 289 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986), pet. for rev. denied (Minn. April 24, 1986). Appellant must prove a constitutional violation beyond a reasonable doubt. Rio Vista Non- Profit Housing Coro. v. County of Ramsev, 335 N.W.2d 242, 245 , (Minn. 1983) appeal dismissed, 464 U.S. 1033 (1984). Respondent contends the phrase "disturb the peace and quiet" has a well accepted, generally understood meaning so that when applied to appellant's conduct, it meets the constitutional standard. We disagree. Respondent cites three cases for. support. In State v. Johnson, 282 Minn. 153, 163 N.W.2d 750 (1968), Vietnam war protesters disrupted the Minneapolis Aquatennial parade by climbing lamp posts, shouting, and distributing leaflets. Charged with violating a Minneapolis ordinance that punishes "conduct which disturbs the peace and quiet," the protesters challenged the ordinance on vagueness grounds.l The supreme court rejected the challenge, reasoning '# .1. The entire ordinance reads: No person, in any public or private place, shall engage in, or prepare, attempt, offer or threaten to engage in, or assist or conspire with another to engage in or congregate because of, any riot, fight, brawl, tumultuous conduct, act of violence, or any other conduct which disturbs the peace and quiet of another save for participating in a recognized athletic contest. Johnson, 282 Minn. at 158 n.l, 163 N.W.2d at 753 n.l (quoting Minneapolis Code of Ordinances, § 870.060). - 4 - that the defendants were aware of the nature of the charged offense, that is, creating traffic congestion during a parade. Johnson, 282 Minn. at 159, 163 N.W.2d at 754. Similarily, in another case, the supreme court affirmed a conviction under the same ordinance when the defendant entered a church during a reverential part of the service, berated a clergyman, and refused to leave. State v. Olson, 287 Minn. 300, 301 -02, 178 N.W.2d 230, 231 (1970). Finally, in 1973 the supreme court rejected a vagueness challenge to Minn. Stat. § 607.705(3), the unlawful assembly statute, when protesters disrupted operation of a restaurant by blocking entrances and damaging property.2 State v. Hipp, 298 Minn. 81, 89 -90,. 213 N.W.2d 610, 615 -16 (1973). Respondent's reliance on these cases is misplaced. Unlike Johnson, Olson, and Hipp where clear observable deviant conduct occurred, appellant's compliance with the ordinance hinged on the officer's personal sense of annoyance over the sound of a natural act, a dog barking. Blocking traffic, disrupting a church service, or interfering with a business are unusual acts, and may be understood by ordinary people of common intelligence as disturbing the peace. Here appellant was left to guess whether hss_ dog's barking disturbed others in the vicinity. The +* 2. The statute provides in part: When three or more persons assemble, each person is guilty of unlawful assembly which is a misdemeanor, if the assembly is: * * * Without lawful purpose, but the participants so conduct themselves in a disorderly manner as to disturb or threaten the public peace. Hipp, 298 Minn. at 82, 213 N.W.2d at 612 (quoting Minn. Stat. § 609.705 (3)). -5- ordinance provided no objective standard against which appellant could measure the level of his dog's barking. The key words in the ordinance are "by any noise disturb the peace and quiet of any persons in the vicinity." who.does that mean? Does that include several month old babies which may easily be disturbed and cry at any strange sound? Does it include the elderly or anyone who is extremely sensitive and claims to be disturbed by any noise above the normal hum of conversation? Does it include persons who, because of their love of pets, have an extremel., high tolerance for barking dogs and mewing .cats, or do we go by the standards of those who strongly dislike any pet within a residential area? The ordinance as written gives no guidance to the pet owner, the neighbor, or the investigating officer as to what is allowable barking and what is not. Besides =ail i n:j tco out appellant on notice of what conduct is prohibited, the ordinance invites arbitrary enforcement. A city may enforce ordinances that reasonably specify what conduct is prohibited. However, it may not enforce an ordinance "whose violation may entirely depend upon whether or not a police _ officer is annoyed." Coates v. Cincinnati, 402 U.S. 611, 614 (1971). Yet this is precisely what ;.his Edina ordinance does. Because the city failed to introduce any evidence from the original complainants who reported appellant's dog barking, the question whether appellant violated the ordinance depended y. entirely on the officer's threshhold of annoyance.3 Under these circumstances the Edina ordinance violates appellant's right to due process of law and therefore we reverse his conviction. We note that the Washington Supreme Court recently addressed this. same issue involving similar facts and a parallel ordinance. See City of Spokane v. Fischer, 110 Wash.2d.541, 754 P.2d 1241 (1988). In Fischer, the ordinance provided for conviction if a dog were permitted to "disturb or annoy another person or neighbor by frequent or habitual howling, yelping or barking." Id. at 543, 754 P.2d at 1241. The court held the ordinance was unconstitutionally vague. It reasoned that because violation of the ordinance turned on the neighbors' level of tolerance or intolerance for barking, an average person of common intelligence could not determine prohibited conduct. We find the reasoning by the court in Fischer logical and persuasive, and adopt it in this case. 3. Edina City Ordinance Number 312, § 29(k) provides that before an officer may issue a citation he must personally investigate the circumstances forming the basis of the complaint. As respondent explained it, this requirement is practical and exemplary. It puts the buffer of a police officer between.two neighbors and, in theory, should help screen nuisance calls from neighbors involved in a petty backyard dispute. However, when the prosecuting authorities made the decision not to call either of the two original complainants to identify by direct evidence what they heard and observed, the city, even though encouraging politeness and good manners between neighbors, deliberately deprived itself of its best evidence. Prosecuting authorities always have the privilege of excepting witnesses from their case in chief, but they also accept the risk that their case becomes weaker. -7- } D E C I S I O N Edina City Ordinance, Number 312, § 29(j) is unconstitu- tionally vague as applied to appellant and deprives him of due process of law. Reversed. -8 "U J �1 A. oe ,: , BOB REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Francis Hoffman City Engineer J Date: 7 May, 1990 Subject: Storm Sewer Projects: Storm Sewer Improvement 204 Easement Line - Parkwood Knolls Storm Sewer Improvement 205 Easement Line - Dundee Road Storm Sewer Improvement 206 Easement Line - E. Sunnyslope Rd. Recommendation: Agenda Item # VII Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ 0 Action 0 ❑ I. E. To HRA To Council Motion Resolution Ordinance Discussion A. Authorize bids for Improvement Projects 204, 205 and 206. B. Nine Mile Creek Watershed District request for emergency overflow at Vernon Avenue and Walnut Ridge Park. Info/ Background The following projects have been reviewed for feasibility and are consistent with our overall stormwater management program: (A) Location: Easement line - Parkwood Knolls Addition (Project 204) Estimated Cost: $17,801.28 Description: This project is a replacement of an existing pipe and pond outlot located north of Parkwood Road and east of Westwood Court. (B) Location: Easement line - East Sunnyslope Road (Project 206) Estimated Cost: $16,327.36 Description: This project is a replacement of existing catch basin and pipe on East Sunnyslope Road and addition of a backyard drain west of East Sunnyslope Road. This area is the low point for several backyards. Report /Recommendation Storm Sewer.Projects: Storm Sewer Improvement 204 Easement Line - Parkwood Knolls Storm Sewer Improvement 205 Easement Line - Dundee Road Storm Sewer Improvement 206 Easement Line - E. Sunnyslope Road Page Two (C) Location: Easement line - Dundee Road (Project 205) Estimated Cost: $ 5,885.60 Description: This project is extending an existing storm sewer into a backyard area which is the low point for, several backyards. This area was-flooded in the frozen ground -rain conditions in March. The neighbors have petitioned for this addition. The three above projects are recommended to be funded thru the Stormwater Utility Fund. Additionally, we have received a request for an emergency overflow system from the neighbors bordering Walnut Ridge Park area. The request is to provide an overflow pipe across Vernon Avenue at Nine Mile Creek. Staff is aware that Nine Mile Creek Watershed District is reviewing this type of improvement in light of the 1987 (Federal disaster) rainstorm event. Staff recommendation is to request Watershed review and funding of this type of project. Staff will present graphics on these four sites at the Council meeting. ch o • 'N�APON`Zbv • IBBB REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Ken Rosland, Manager From: Marcella Daehn, Clerk Date: May 4, 1990 Subject: On -Sale Wine License and On -Sale Beer License for Scott Kee's Tour de Fran 4924 France Avenue So. Recommendation: Agenda Item # VIII.F Consent ❑ ❑ Information Only ❑ ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ ❑ T To HRA ❑� T To Cou Action ❑ ❑ M Motion L1 R Resolut !; I O Ordinen ❑ D Discus Approval of Issuance of an On -Sale Beer License and On -Sale Wine License to Scott Kee's Tour de France restaurant at 4924 France Avenue South. Info /Background: The City has received applications for both an On -Sale Beer License and an On -Sale Wine License from Scott Kee's Tour de France restaurant located at 4924 France Avenue South, together with applications for two Manager's Licenses. The applications have been reviewed by the Police, Health and Planning Departments and the necessary investigations have been conducted. Hemorandums are attached from these departments in support of issuance of the On -Sale Wine License. The departments have also approved issuance of the beer license. `j M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth E. Rosland FROM: Craig G. Swanson SUBJECT: On -Sale Wine License DATE: April 23, 1990 The on -sale wine license application of the below - listed . establishment has been investigated in accordance with applicable statutes and ordinances: Scott Kee's Tour de France 4924 France Ave. S. Edina, MN 55410 The findings of this investigation do not reveal information that is contrary to the public interest for the purpose of licensing. Therefore, I recommend the Council move to approve the application and issuance of an on -sale wine license for the establishment conditioned upon approval by the State of Minnesota, and instruct the City Clerk to forward the required documents to the State of Minnesota for their approval. CRAIG G. SWANSON CHIEF/OF POLICE. CGS:nah M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth Rosland FROM: Elliott Marston SUBJECT: On -Sale Wine License Application DATE: May 7, 1990 The on -sale wine license application for Scott Kee's Tour de France, 4924 France Avenue South, Edina, MN. has been reviewed by the Health Department. Our investigation of the premises finds that the subject restaurant complies with the requirements of Ordinance No. 902 with respect to seating capacity, food establishment license and appropriate storage and food handling space which is not adversely impacted by the storage and service of wine. I would recommend that the on -sale wine license be approved. i M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth E. Rosland FROM: Craig Larsen, City Planner(/ / SUBJECT: On -Sale Wine License - Scott Kee's Tour de France DATE: May 7, 1990 The on -sale wine license application for Scott Kee's Tour de France, 4924 France Avenue South, Edina, MN. has been reviewed by the Planning Department. The premises meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and I would recommend approval of the license application. Agenda Item IX.A.1 & 2 `SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION C/O MOSS & BARNETT 4800 Norwest Center 90 SOLIth Seventh Street Muineapolis, MN 55402 -4119 (612) 347 -0300 April 18, 1990 Mr. Kenneth Rosland City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Ken: Please find enclosed the following: 1. The agenda cover page from the Southwest Commission meeting describing the name change requirements. 2. The Resolution recommending approval of the requested name change adopted by the Commission on April 4, 1990. 3. An Acknowledgement and Consent form executed by KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc., and its parent companies. 4. A Resolution for adoption by your city council. 5. An Ordinance Amendment to be adopted by your City. Will you kindly have these matters placed on your city council agenda for approval and adoption at the earliest opportune_ time. Kindly have your city clerk send us two certified copies of both the Resolution and Ordinance after adoption. We will send one certified copy of each document to Paragon, file one copy of each document in the Commission files on your City's behalf, and arrange for the completion of all requirements related to this matter. Please call me if you have any questions. Very truly yours, C�-U�-L Adrian E. Herbst 225ZKJD Enclosures cc: Debra Cottone Ann Mathews Cities of Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, Minnetonka & Richfield SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM NO. I Description Initiated By Date Company Name Change Paragon March 26, 1990 Rogers Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. ( "RCTSI ") desires to change its corporate name to KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. ( "KBLCSI ") and has requested the approval of the name change by the Southwest Suburban Cable Com- mission("SWSCC") and its Member Cities. RCTSI does not intend to make any changes to its corporate structure or to the control of its operations, but simply desires to change its name. Given that RCTSI intends only to change its name and not its corporate structure, this matter can be handled by the Member Cities by resolution without all of the formal transfer documents usually required in connection with a transfer request. As long as KBLCSI and its parent companies acknowledge that KBLCSI is the corporate successor of RCTSI, and the parent companies reaffirm their status as guarantors of KBLCSI's obligations under the Franchise, the Member Cities can proceed to approve RCTSI's request. Accordingly, counsel for SWSCC has prepared a resolution for adoption by the Commission recommending approval of the request for a name change and also has prepared a model Resolution and model Ordinance for use by the Member Cities in approving the name change should they decide to do so. The Commission should note that the Franchise and the relevant closing documents relating to the recent transfer of ownership from the Rogers Commu- nication group to KBLCOM Incorporated ( "KBLCOM ") provide that the Franchise and the related documents shall be binding on the successor in interest of RCTSI. Accordingly, counsel for the Commission has prepared an Acknowledgement and Consent form pursuant to which I(BLCSI's parent companies, KBLCOM and KBL Cable, Inc. ( "KBLC "), acknowledge that KBLCSI is the corporate successor to RCTSI. The document also reaffirms KBLCOM's and KBLC's status as guarantors of KBLCSI's rights and obligations under the Franchise and the agreements related thereto. The Operating Committee reviewed this matter and all supporting documents at its meeting of March 22, 1990. RECOMMENDATION The Operating Committee recommends that the Commission adopt the attached Resolution approving the change of the name of the Grantee under the Franchise from Rogers Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. to KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc., provided KBLC, KBLCOM, and KBLCSI first execute and deliver to each Member City an Acknowledgement and Consent in a form satisfactory to each Member City. The request for approval of the name change should then be presented to each Member City-for action. APPROVED -2- DENIED N n Vf'1 T TTTTnAl RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF NAME CHANGE FROM ROGERS CABLESYSTEMS OF THE SOUTHWEST, INC. TO KBL CABLESYSTEMS OF THE SOUTHWEST, INC. WHEREAS, Rogers Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc: ( "RCTSI ") is the current grantee under the cable communication franchises granted pursuant to the cable communication ordinances (collectively, the "Franchises ") of the Cities of Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, Minnetonka, and Richfield, Minnesota ( "Member Cities "); and WHEREAS, RCTSI desires to change its name to KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest; Inc., d /b /a Paragon Cable ( "KBLCSI ") and has requested the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission ( "SWSCC ") and its Member Cities to the approve the name change; and WHEREAS, RCTSI does not intend to make any changes to its ownership struc- ture or to the control of its operations, but desires only to change its, name; and WHEREAS, .KBL Cable, Inc. ( "KBLC ") and KBLCOM Incorporated ( "KBLCOM ") are the guarantors of RCTSI's obligations under the Franchises pursuant to a Consent Agreement and Guaranty of Performance given to each Member City; and WHEREAS, the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission ( "SWSCC ") has reviewed the re-:.uest for approval of RCTSI's name change and has found no reason to disap- prove of the request, provided that KBLC, KBLCOM, and KBLCSI acknowledge and agree in a writing acceptable to the Member Cities that'KBLCSI is the corporate successor of RCTSI for all purposes under the Franchises and all agreements related thereto, and further provided that KBLC and KBLCOM reaffirm their status as guarantors of KBLCSI's obligations under the Franchises. NOW, THEREFORE, at a regularly scheduled meeting of SWSCC, SWSCC resolves as follows: SWSCC hereby approves and recommends to the Member Cities that each of them consent to and approve RCTSI's request for a name change to KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc., d /b /a Paragon Cable, provided KBLC, KBLCOM, and KBLCSI first execute and deliver to each Member City an Acknowledgement and Consent in a form satisfactory to the Member Cities. Dated this day of ' 1990. SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION By%��;:: Its'Chairpp, son -2- ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND CONSENT Parties: KBL Cable, Inc., a Delaware corporation ( "KBLC "). KBLCOM, Incorporated, a Texas corporation ( "KBLCOM "). KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc., a Minnesota corporation d /b /a Paragon Cable ( "KBLCSI "). Effective Date: March 20, 1990. Recitals: 1. Rogers Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. ( "RCTSI ") , a wholly -owned subsidiary of KBLC (which is a wholly -owned subsidiary of KBLCOM) , is the current grantee under the cable communications ordinances (the "Franchises ") of the Cities of Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, Minnetonka, and Richfield, Minnesota (collectively, the "Cities "). 2. KBLC and KBLCOM are the corporate guarantors of RCTSI's obligations under the Franchises pursuant to a Consent Agreement and Guaranty of Performance between KBLC, KBLCOM, and each City ( "Guaranty "). 3. RCTSI desires to change its name to KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. and has requested the approval of each City to do so. 4. The Cities are willing to consent to the name change, provided KBLC, KBLCOM and KBLCSI acknowledge in writing that KBLCSI is the successor of RCTSI for all purposes related to the Franchises and that the Guaranty shall remain in full force and effect. Acknowledgement and Agreements: 1. KBLC, KBLCOM, and KBLCSI hereby acknowledge and agree that KBLCSI is the successor in interest to RCTSI for all purposes under the Franchises and the Guaranty (including the Guaranteed Documents as defined in the Guaranty). 2. KBLC, KBLCOM, and KBLCSI represent and warrant to the Cities that RCTSI intends only to change its corporate name to KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc., and that no changes in the ownership or control of RCTSI will occur as a result of this name change. 3. KBLC and KBLCOM acknowledge and agree that they remain fully bound under the Guaranty as guarantors of KBLCSI's obligations under the Franchises and the Guaranteed Documents (as defined in the Guaranty). KBLC and KBLCOM hereby waive any defenses to the enforcement of the Guaranty based on RCTSI's change of its name to KBLCSI. KBL CABLE, INC. By Its ice President, Sgkretary reasurer KBLCOM INCORPORATED By Its Vice President, tary Treasurer IV KBL CABLESYSTEMS OF THE SOUTHWEST, INC. By Its Vice President, re ary reasurer -2- CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL' TO A CHANGE OF NAME OF GRANTEE FROM ROGERS CABLESYSTEMS OF THE SOUTHWEST, INC. TO KBL CABLESYSTEMS OF THE SOUTHWEST," INC. D /B /A PARAGON CABLE WHEREAS, Rogers Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. ("RCTSI ") is the current grantee under the cable communications ordinance ( "Franchise ") of the City of Edina, Minnesota ( "City "); and WHEREAS, RCTSI desires to change its corporate name to KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc., d /b /a Paragon Cable ( "KBLCSI ") and has requested the City's approval of the name change; and WHEREAS, RCTSI does not intend to make any changes to its ownership struc- ture or to the control of its operations, but desires only to change its name; and - WHEREAS, KBL Cable, Inc. ( "KBLC ") and KBLCOM Incorporated ( "KBLCOM ") are the guarantors of RCTSI's obligations.under the Franchise pursuant to a Consent Agreement and Guaranty of Performance given to the City; and WHEREAS, the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission ( "SWSCC ") reviewed the request for approval of RCTSI's name change and found no reason to disapprove of the request, provided KBLC, KBLCOM, and KBLCSI first acknowledge and agree in a writing acceptable to SWSCC's member cities that KBLCSI is the corporate suc- cessor of RCTSI for all purposes under the Franchise and that KBLC and KBLCOM reaffirm their status as guarantors of KBLCSI's obligations under the Franchise; and WHEREAS, the City joins in the foregoing findings of SWSCC. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. The City hereby consents to and approves the change of the name of the grantee under the Franchise from Rogers Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. to KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc., d /b /a Paragon Cable, provided KBLCOM Incorporated, KBL Cable, Inc., and KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. first file with the City an Acknowledgement and Consent in a form and substance acceptable to the City. 2. The City declares-that as of the time of this Resolution, the Fran- chase and all agreements entered into by RCTSI in connection therewith shall remain in full force and effect, except that KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. shall be deemed to have been substituted as grantee and shall be obligated as RCTSI's successor in interest to perform all of RCTSI's duties and obliga- tions thereunder. Passed and adopted this day of Edina. Attest: City Clerk -2- , 1990, by the City of CITY OF EDINA By Its OPDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1120 TO CHANGE THE NAME OF GRANTEE THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, DOES ORDAIN: SECTION 1. That Article I, Section 2, Paragraph J of said Ordinance be -- amended to read as follows: J. "Grantee" is Rages- 6a��esyseffis- e- e- fieei�we9e; 1-tte- KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, d /b /a Paragon Cable. SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon adoption and publication, provided that it shall become effective only if all of the Cities of Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, Minnetonka and Richfield adopt an ordinance similar to this Ordinance within sixty (60) days after the adoption of this Ordinance. First Reading: Second Reading: Published in the Edina Sun - Current on ATTEST: City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )ss. CITY OF EDINA ) CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By Its Mayor By Its Manager CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance is a true and correct copy of the Ordinance duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of 1990, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 1990. City Clerk RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL TO A CHANGE OF NAME OF GRANTEE FROM ROGERS CABLESYSTEMS OF THE SOUTHWEST, INC. TO KBL CABLESYSTEMS OF THE SOUTHWEST, INC. D /B /A PARAGON CABLE WHEREAS, Rogers Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. ( "RCTSI ") is the current grantee under the cable communications ordinance ( "Franchise ") of the City of Edina, Minnesota ( "City "); and WHEREAS, RCTSI desires to change its corporate name to KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc., c/b /a Paragon Cable ( "KBLCSI ") and has requested the City's approval of the name change; and WHEREAS, RCTSI does not intend to make any changes to its ownership structure or to the control of its operations, but desires only to change its name; and WHEREAS, KBL Cable, Inc ( "KBLC ") and KBLCOM Incorporated ( "KBLCOM ") are the guarantors of RCTSI's obligations under the Franchise pursuant to a Consent Agreement and Guaranty of Performance given to the City; and WHEREAS, the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission ( "SWSCC ") reviewed the request for approval of RCTSI's name change and found no reason to disapprove of the request, provided KBLC, KBLCOM, and KBLCSI first acknowledge and agree in a writing acceptable to SWSCC's member cities that KBLCSI is the corporate successor of RCTSI for all purposes under the Franchise and that KBLC and KBLCOM reaffirm their status as guarantors of KBLCSI's obligations under the Franchise; and WHEREAS, the City joins in the foregoing findings of SWSCC. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. The city hereby consents to and approves the change of the name of the grantee under the Franchise from Rogers Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. to KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc., d /b /a/ Paragon Cable, provided KBLCOM Incorporated, KBL Cable, Inc., and KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. first file with the City an Acknowledgement and Consent in a form and substance acceptable to the City. 2. The City declares that as of the time of this Resolution, the Franchise and all agreements entered into by RCTSI in connection therewith shall remain in full force and effect, except that KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. shall be deemed to have been substituted as grantee and shall be obligated as RCTSI's successor in interest to perform all of RCTSI's duties and obligations thereunder. Passed and adopted this 7th day of May, 1990, by the City of Edina. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ATTEST: By Its Mayor City Clerk i t � A i O ixea REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From. Francis Hoffman City Engineer Date. 7 May, 1990 Subject: Attached Minneapolis Request Recommendation: Agenda Item # lX.B. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA E To Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Defer until May 21st Council Meeting. Info /Background: Attached is a letter from Minneapolis requesting support on a funding proposal to study risks of contamination of the Upper Mississippi River. Staff is also aware of an additional study about alternative water supply which should be discussed with Council prior to the passing of a resolution. INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS OFFICE 'H',." C _'(-ALL \11NNEAPO_ S, 'v'% X5415 1612, 318 -7552 Kenneth Rosland, \tanager City,- of Edina 4801 t}. 50th Street cii ia, �1N ,5 4 2 Dear Mr. Rosland: EXHIBIT A am o��R�po �o� �a�� ofd kb'? April 16, 1990 The City of Minneapolis recently submitted an application to the Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources to conduct a study w hich will assess the risks of contamination of the Upper Mississippi River. The Study, if funded, would begin in 1991 and be conducted over a two -yeas time period. .attached is a summary of the entire proposal. The decision on funding will probable be made in late summer of 1990. As a part of this application, the City- is seeking the support of the cities which currently are served by the Minneapolis Seater Worts. Also attached is a sample resolution which could be considered by your city council. Tf �'ou have any questions, please give me a call at 673 -2039. Sincerely, William Barnhart Government Relations Representative AFFIRMATIVE ACTON EVPLOVER -- YIVOICE 16121 348 -2151 SAMPLE RESOLUTION WHEREAS: The Mississippi River is the primary source of water for approximately 900,000 people in the Twin C'it.ies Metropolitan Area; and WHEREAS: The NMetropoiitan Council in recent reports has recommended decreased reliance on ground water and continued utilization of surface water; and WHEREAS: There is currently- no comprehensive watershed protection program for the Upper Mississippi; and WHEREAS: The City- of Minneapolis has submitted an application to the Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources to determine potential sources of contamination for the Upper Mississippi River, estimate the liklihood of severe contamination incidents, and identify strategies to reduce the level of risk; and WHEREAS: The City- of Edina is served by the ^Minneapolis Water Works; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA THAT: The City of Edina endorses the application of the C'it.v of Minneapolis to the Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources to assess the risk of contamination of the Upper Mississippi River and urges that the project be funded. 1991 LCMR Funding Proposal PROGRAM TITLE: Assessment of the Risks of'Contamination of the Upper Mississippi Biennial Program J.F. Hayek, P.E.; Director Total: 5500,000 Manager: Minneapolis Water Works 205 South 4th Street Minneapolis MN 55415 Minneapolis MN 55415 ?H: 612- 673 -2418 I. narrative. Chemical, biological, or radiological contamination of the Upper Mississippi River could jeopardize drinking water supplies and the river ecology. This project would determine the potential sources of contamination, estimate the likelihood of severe contamination incidents. and identify strategies to reduce the level of risk. II. Objectives A. Inventory of Contaminant Sources in the Upper Mississippi River Basin. 1. Narrative. The inventory will produce a document identifying potential contaminant sources by location, degree of toxicity, quantity, and mode of entry to the river. 2. Amount budgeted for the objective. $200,000 3. Product timeline. Starting Date is July 1, 1991. a. Review of report on literature review, analysis of previous incidents, and development of survey scope and procedures. August 1991. b. Field survey and data collection. August 1991 to July,1992. Quarterly reports due in October 1991; January 1992; and April 1992. c. Review of Final Survey Report. July, 1992. 4. Benefits. (1)The development of baseline contamination data. (2)Data would also be shared with other researchers and agencies. B. Impact of Contamination of the Mississippi River. 1. Narrative. The impact analysis will (a) develop contamination scenarios based on field data for various flow rates and locations; 4b) estimate the extent and duration of each scenario and the impact on water treatment; and (c) determine the relative likelihood of the identified scenarios occurring. 2. Amount budgeted for this objective. $190,000 3. Product timeline. Start date is July, 1991. a. Report on literature survey and proposed analysis. October 1991 b. Interim report on analysis of field data. January 1992. c. Summary report on all field data. October 1992. 4. Benefits. (1)The determination of the most serious contamination problems requiring priority emergency planning and mitigation strategies. (2)The development of innovative computer modeling techniques. C. Emergencv Planning and Mitigation Analysis. 1. Narrative. This research and interagency coordination effort will (a) develop mitigation alternatives (improved detection and warning, rerouting of hazardous materials, drainage control, changes in water treatment procedures or capacity) and. (b) determine the impact of mitigation strategies on risk reduction (cost- benefit analysis). 2. Amount budgeted. $110.000 3. Product timeline. Start date is June 1992. a. Interim report on research and proposed methodology. August 1992. b. Final mitigation report. June 1993. Quarterly reports due October 1992; January 1993: and April 1993. 4. Benefits. ;:)The basis for recommendations for actions by local ard'state agencies. (2)Development of multi- agency education and.collaborationc._ III. Context. IMPACT o Approximately 900,000 people in the metropolitan area and 50,000 people in St. Cloud rely entirely or substantially on the Mississippi for their drinking water. o Twenty -two communities in the state rely on surface waters other than the Mississippi to meet their drinking water needs. This project could be replicated to manage the risks to their water supplies. o There is currently no comprehensive watershed protection program for the Upper Mississippi. o The Metropolitan Council in their report on metro water planning recommended decreased reliance on ground water and increased use of surface water. Preventing degradation of river quality would become even more important. COORDINATION AND FUNDING o Representatives of the following agencies have endorsed the need for this project and have agreed to provide research support: the Upper Mississippi Headwaters Board, the Freshwater Foundation, the U.S. Corps of Engineers. MPCA, MDNR, Metropolitan Council, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, St. Cloud Water Works, and St. Paul Water Utility. o This project will make direct use of data from the Water Quality Monitoring Project of the Upper Mississippi Headwaters Board and the LCMR- funded Land Use Update Project. o Minneapolis has committed up to $65,000 in direct matching funds for this project. An additional S400,000 .has been budgeted by the city for a parallel project to study alternative water sources. Minneapolis is now seeking additional funding for the project l EXHIBIT B ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLY INTERVIEWS BL00MINGTON. EDINA, GOLDEN VALLEY, CRYSTAL, COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, HILLTOP. NEW HOPE 1. GENERAL PERCEPTIONS A. Current View of Water Supply Issues i. Surface water optimization ii. Groundwater for peaking and emergency supply iii. Regionalization iv. Threats to groundwater quality B. Suburban Dependency on Minneapolis Advantages /Disadvantages i. Rates ii. Administrative iii. Political - iv. Quality - implementation of safe water drinking act regulations V. Control C. Existing Emergency Plans D. Minneapolis Contingency Needs i. Basic perceptions of need ii. Threats to availability of water iii. Impact on purchasing community (possible solutions to problems) a. water quality incident b. drought E. Development of Independent System i. Replacement/base ii. Emergency 0003090 /AWSI.WP /TMK 1 2. CHARACTERISTICS OF SYSTEM A. Sources i. In place wells /wellhead protection ii. Supply studies iii. Planned modifications B. Interconnection i. Minneapolis ii. Adjacent surface water sources iii. Adjacent groundwater sources C. Design i. Independent system layout ii. Pressures iii. System analysis iv. Planned modifications D. Storage i. Existing a. active b. fire ii. Planned E. Treatment i. Existing ii. Planned 0003090 /AWSI.WP/TMK 2 3. HISTORIC USE A. Demand Summaries i. Annual ii. Base iii. Max day /month iv. Per capita B. User Class (billing records) i. Residential a. single b. multiple ii. Commercial iii. Industrial a. city supplied b. independent supply 4. FUTURE DEMAND A. Population i. Existing ii. Projections iii. Saturation B. Land Use i. Existing ii. Future development class /type 0003090 /AWSI.WP/TMK 3 Agenda Item IX.0 off as ociation of me�ropoIitan municipalities 1990 AMM ANNUAL MEETING WHEN: WEDNESDAY, MAY 16, 1990 WHERE: MC GUIRES INN ' 1201 West County Road E Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 5:30 P.M. 6:30 P.M. Social Hour Western Deluxe Buffet (Cash Bar) (BBQ Ribs, Glazed Ham, and Ranch Style Chicken, Western Potatoes, salads and veggies, dessert and more) Cost: $20.00 Per Person 7.30 P.M. Annual Business Meeting SPOUSES, SIGNIFICANT OTHERS, AND GUESTS ARE WELCOME 1. DINNER RESERVATIONS TO CAROL WILLIAMS (227 -4008) BY' NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, MAY 11. (Reservations are not needed if you only plan to attend the business meeting portion - Please channel reservations through your city Manager /Administrator office). 2. PLEASE COME AND PROVIDE YOUR INPUT AND REACTION TO THE ENCLOSED MISSION AND MEMBERSHIP SERVICES TASK FORCE REPORT CONCERNING THE FUTURE DIRECTION OF THE AMM. SEE MAP AND MEETING AGENDA ON REVERSE DISTRIBUTION NOTE: This notice has been mailed to Mayors, Councilmembers and Managers /Administrators individually. 183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227 -4008 BUSINESS MEETING AGENDA 1. Welcome To Arden Hills. 2. Recognize Retiring Officers and Board Directors. 3. Mission and Membership Services Report by Kevin Frazell, Administrator, Cottage Grove. 4. President's Annual Report: Walt Fehst. 5. Annual Election of Officers and Directors. A. Report of Nominating Committee - Gary Bastian, Past President. B. Election (President, Vice - President and Directors). 6. Comments of the President Elect. 7. Legislative Report - WHAT HAPPENED ON MAJOR ISSUES. 8. Adjourn. 10 ARDEN MILLS 5 694 COUNTY ROAD E O 65 a 5 51 = B X W J 36 = 4s 8 J W 35 MINNEAPOLIS = N 94 12 35W ST. PAUL v 494 52 1-6% to lzdVon Ave. bdt,'South V4 Mile. Leadershi p! Environment ,. Schedule", S_ ervices • 1 {. gig/' a � ' .;�r� , Y y Schedule", 1990 LMC Annual Conference Housing Housing information Early Bird Special SINGLE DOUBLE For member city officials only. The Radisson Duluth, Holiday Inn Radisson Hotel Duluth :.:.......................$60 $65 _ and Edgewater Motel will each provide one complimentary weekend 505 West Superior Street for two at their facilities, excluding meals, as an early bird special Holiday Inn Duluth .... ............................$62 $68 prize. Only delegates sending in their housing registration form by 207 West Superior Street May 1. 1990 will be eligible. The winner must pay the room tax and Park Inn Int ernational. ...........................$58 $58 all incidental charges. 250 Canal Park Drive Edgewater Motels East & West. ............ $60 $60 Important Instructions 2211 London Road Rooms will be- named on a first-come. fast - served basis. The Edgewater Motels Atrium .....................$75 $75 earlier you make your reservations, the better the chance you will 2330 London Road , • have of geeing your fast choice hotel. The hotels will hold the room Fitger's Inn ............ .............................. $85 $85 block until May 29, 1990, after which regular room rates will be in 600 East Superior Street = effect if available. Downtown Best We stern ......................$35 $47 131 West 2nd Street A d 't ual to one ni 's lodging �t � � gmg Per room must accompany this College of St. Schobodi a .:..................$23.50 $15.85/person housing form. 1200 Kenwood gvegnQ? NOTE: The SL.Scholastim has agr6ed to provide•two CREDIT CARD PREFERRED., wings of 20 sleeplrig't►pns each for our attendees. The College will ' "�MC�CKS PAYABLE TO LMC HOUSING BUREAU. furnish bed IiaenC'btit nct maid service. Towels are exchanged dai>jr. 12 percent sales iax will be added to the above rates. Cities are not , You will receive an acknowledgement of your reservation from the - exempt from paying sales tax on sleeping rooms. assigned hotel. NOTE: The Radisson Hotel Duluth is the headquarters hotel All changes In reservations or cancellations must be made through the Housing Bureau in writing. Housing Reservation (please print or type) Name: Title City or Organization: City: State: Zip: Arrival Date: Arrival Time: Departure Date: Hotel Preference First: Second: Special Requirements: Names of All Occupants: Do you wish to guarantee payment for arrival after 6:00 p.m? Yes No Enclosed is a deposit equal to one night's lodging per room. MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO LMC HOUSING BUREAU League of Minnesota Cities Housing Bureau Duluth Convention Bureau & Visitors Bureau 100 Lake Place Drive Duluth, MN 55802 Attn: Lauri O'Connor Credit Card Preferred Credit Card Company Card Number Expiration Date The LMC Housing Bureau is authorized to use the above card to guarantee my hotel reservations reserved by me. I under- stand that one night's room will be billed through this card if I fail to show up for my assigned housing on the confirmed date unless I have cancelled my reservations with the hotel prior to 6:00 p.m. on the day of arrival. Cardholder signature Date Retain a copy of this form for your records. If you do not receive a confirmation from the hotel within two weeks, contact Lauri O'Connor at (218) 722 -4011. Please type or print Name Nickname for badge Title City or organization Mailing address City Telephone ( 1990 Annual Conference Registration State Sex F M Zip Family members attending (No registration fee BUT DOES NOT INCLUDE MEAL TICKETS. ORDER BELOW) Spouse full name Sex Child Age Child Age F M This is my first League of Minnesota Cities Annual Conference. FULL CONFERENCE June 12- 15,1990_ Registration includes a on to all sessions and tickets f�ednes- day exhibitor's luncheon., %'4da ' (uncheon.;Thursday banq!ei;ind �- Friday cofree and rolls. • ;` MINI - CONFERENCE. June 14, 1990 `' ' Registration.includes;adoiissiou tw. all Thursday sessions; Mayoeq 0. . luncheon and eofr*e , i3S N(Yr include thejbiitsday qq � Order .tickets= for, the `6aingttet l(ow: Early Registration (Postmarked by May 15, 1990) $155 Full Conference S S65 Mini - Conference S Advance Registration (Postmarked by May 30, 1990) $180 Full Conference $ $75 Mini - Conference S On -Site Registration (at Conference) $195 Full Conference $ S85 Mini- Conference S Extra Meal Tickets * $5.00 Tuesday Evening Fish Boil S S11 Wednesday Exhibitor's Lunch S $I1 Thursday Mayor's Luncheon S $23 Thursday Banquet S * See the program in the April issue of Minnesota Cities. for details of Tuesday Evening's Special Kick -Off at Glensheen Mansion. City contact Daytime phone #_ a.c Feel free to duplicate for multiple registrations. I. General Information Every delegate, guest, speaker. media representative, and other attendees MUST REGISTER with this form. Complete the form in full and return it along with full payment of all appro- priate conference registration fee to address indicated NOTE: No registration will be proc- essed without payment in full, or with- out an accompanying city voucher or purchase order. IL- Conference Registration-Dead- lines May 15, 1990: Final postmark dead- line for Early Registration. May 30, 1990: Final postmark dead- line for Advance Registration. z III. Conference kewg' tcatlon letLerofrtr$islatiogeanctaion iatlst W. `� amlateraban May 30,:1990 o qualify fora refund of reg- istration fees: A registration cancellation is subject to a $10 cancellation fee. IV. Special Needs:- If you are disabled and require special services, or if you have special dietary needs, Please attach .a written descrip- tion. V. Registration Confirmation Pre - registrants will receive'a postcard iclmowledgement� to be presented at the ADVANCE REGISTRATION desk for quick registration. VI. For more information For more information contact:Cathy Dovidio (612) 227 -5600. Make check payable and return with form to League of Minnesota Cities, 183 University Avenue East St. Paul, MN 55101. LMC Annual Conference Quality: Leadership, Service, Environment Effective Education for Cities Preliminary Program Schedule Tuesday, June 12, 1990 Thursday, June 14, 1990 Tuesday Night Kick -off. Special Evening Planned Concurrent Session IV (choose one) at Glensheen Mansion 9:00 a.m. -10:30 a.m. 6:30 p.m. Wednesday, June 13, 1990 Welcome/Opening Session Quality Service: A priority for Minnesota cities 9:00 a.m. -10:15 a.m. Alfred A. Checchi, Chairman, Northwest Airlines Concurrent Session I (choose one) 10:30 a.m. -11:45 a.m. 0 Defining Roles Between Council and Manager /Administrator 0 Role of Consultant/Consultant Responsibilities j Disposing of Our Waste: Recycling Approaches and Issues ,T Economic Development Thru Creative Collaboration Exhibitors' lunch 11:45 a.m. -1:15 p.m. General Session A Drug Policy for Minnesota 1:15 p.m. -2:15 p.m. Jan Smaby, Director, Office of Drug Policy Concurrent Session n (choose one) 2:30 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. Elected Officials: How to Keep Informed Improving Customer Service Waste Processing Alternatives: Landfills, Burning, Composting 7 Addressing Changing Demographics/ Using Census Data Concurrent Session III: LMC Policy Committees (choose one) 3:45 p.m. -5:00 p.m. Development Strategies Committee General Legislation and Personnel Committee Elections and Ethics Committee Revenue Sources Committee Land Use, Environment, Energy, Transportation Committee City night Cocktail reception on William S. Irving, followed by an evening of food, entertainment, carriage rides, and more 6:30 p.m. Administrator /Manager Performance Assessment Ethics Hazardous Materials and the City V Survival of Small Cities: Part I Concurrent Session V (choose one) 10:45 a.m.- 12:15. p.m. 0 Budgeting for the Future: Meeting Revenue Needs in the 90's - Employee Performance Appraisal Water Quality Issues V Survival of Small Cities: Part II Mayors Association/Mini Conference Luncheon 12:30 p.m. -2:00 p.m. Bob Bolen, NLC President, Mayor, Fort Worth, Texas Concurrent Session VI (choose one) 2:15 p.m. -3:30 p.m. Current Issues (LMCIT) V Drug Testing Policies and Administration Meeting Future Transportation Needs for Minnesota V Annexation and Related Issues for Small Cities League Annual Meeting 3:45 p.m. LMC Reception and Banquet 6:30 p.m. Friday, June 15, 1990 Finale General Session Leadership, Power and Productivity: Doing Well by Doing Good 9:30 a.m. Layne Longfellow Keys Quality Leadership Quality Services Fnvironmental Quality '° Quality of Community Life - Quality of Community Life/Small Cities - Quality Personnel \V 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 124J74 04/24/90 N x N N N N 127701 04/24/90 127702 04/24/90 127703 04/24/90 127704 04/24/90 127705 04/24/90 127706 04/24/90 127707 04/24/90 127708 04/2/90 127709 04/24/90 127,710 04/4/90 127710 04/24/90 127711 04/24/90 127712 04/24/90 127713 04/24/90 127714 04/24/90 127715 04/24/90 127716 04/24/90 xxNNxx CHECK REGISTER 05 -07 -90 PAGE 1 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 21.20. JUSTUS LUMBER DRYWELL /JOINT TAPE 10- 4540 - 520 -52 30272 6543 21.20 * * ** -CKS 6.30 PEGS STATIONERS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 420 742 6.30 * 90.00 HUTCHINSON ELECT CABLE /PHOTO SUPPLIES 12- 4508 - 434 -43 38 90.00 * 964.69 KENNY BOILER MFG CO REPAIR BOILER 10- 4248 - 520 -52 73017 6940 964.69 * 200.00 ELIZABETH BERGMAN REFUND 30- 3507 - 000 -00 200.00 * 200.00 PAUL VANFOSSAN REFUND 30- 3507 - 000 -00 200.00 * 165.10 WATER SPECIALTY CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 783 -78 1241 7126 165.10 * 130.50 LYNDE GREENHOUSE TREES /FLOWERS /SHRUBS 30- 4660 - 782 -78 18709 7125 130.50 * 8.00 ACTION MESSENGER INC POSTAGE 30- 4290 - 781 -78 87203 7123 8.00 * 49.J0 DENISON MAILING SERV MAILING SERV 10- 4201 - 200 -20 49'.00 * 180.00 MN SAFETY COUNCIL SERVICES 10- 4202 - 280 -28 28509 6871 90.00 MN SAFETY COUNCIL SERVICES 10- 4202 - 420 -42 28509 6871 270.00 * 118.78 METRO ELECTRIC ELECTRIC REPAIR 10- 4248 - 440 -44 12197 6698 118.78 75.00 FIGURE SKATING CLUB ARENA PROGRAMS 10- 4504 - 627 -62 7040 75.00 * 87.26 GROTH MUSIC MUSIC 10- 4596 - 627 -62 7041 87.26 * 53,044.00 EARL WEIKLE /SONS AC REMODEL 23- 1300 - 001 -00 53,044.00 * 60.50 AXNER CO INC COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 3907 6666 60.50 * 75.00 NEW N ARTSCAPE ADVERTISING 23- 4214 - 611 -61 6907 75.00 * * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 127719 04/24/90 294.15 GOPHER HGT /SHEET MET REPAIRS 294.15 * 127720 04/24/90 100.00 EASYBAR OF MN INC BAR REPAIRS 100.00 * 127721 04/24/90 230.32 LAKEVILLE MTR EXPRES FREIGHT 230.32 * 127722 04/24/90 110.00 KEN SEVERUD REIMBURSEMENT 110.00 * 127723 04/14/90 160.00 MN LICENSED BEV ASSO TRAINING 127723 04/24/90 160.00 MN LICENSED BEV ASSO TRAINING 127723 04/24/90 .155.00 MN LICENSED BEV ASSO TRAINING 475.00 * 127724 04/24/90 24.00 CATHY CHAVEZ REFUND 24.00 * 127725 04/27;90 960.00- BOY SCOUTS OF AM CONFERENCE 127725 04/24/90 960.00 BOY SCOUTS OF AM NATIONAL CONFERENCE .00 * 127726 04/24/90 29.27 STANLEY OLSON REFUND 29.27 * 127727 04/24/90 58.80 PETER ROWLAND REFUND 58.80 * 127728 04/24/90 668.11 NASCO GENERAL SUPPLIES 668.11 * 127729 04/24/90 945.00 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGN SIGN BLANKS 945.00 * 127730 04/24/90 385.00 SPECIALIZED GRAPHICS DOOR HANGERS 385.00 * 127731 04/24/90 180.00 MASON CUTTERS FLOOR HOLES 180.00 * 127732 04/24/90 253.40 NS CONCRETE COMPANY STORM SEWER PIPES 253.40 * 127733 04/24/90 325.00 FILTRA TECH SYSTEM GENERAL SUPPLIES 325.00 * 127734 05/01/90 272.30 NEAL BROTEN SPORTS LAUNDRY /UNIFORMS 127734 04/24/90 497.40 NEAL BROTEN SPORTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 769.70 * 127735 04/24/90 449.88 DIESEL INJECTN SPE EXCHANGE NOZZLES 127735 04/24/90 753.10 DIESEL INJECTN SPE REPAIR PARTS r 0 05 -07 -90 PAGE 2 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 27- 4248 - 662 -66 1590 7063 27- 4248 - 662 -66 90032 3596 27- 1300 - 005 -00 7191 27- 3375- 667 -66 50- 4202 - 620 -82 41390 7064 50- 4202 - 840 -84 41390 7064 50- 4202 - 860 -86 41390 7064 10- 1145 - 000 -00 10- 4202 - 430 -42 10- 4202 - 430 -42 40- 3800 - 000 -00 40- 3800 - 000 -00 10- 4504 - 482 -48 334432 6618 10- 4542 - 325 -30 25963 6481 40- 4248 - 803 -80 1920 7102 40- 4540 - 801 -80 211731 6696 41- 4550 - 900 -90 160810 6994 40- 4504 - 801 -80 8285 6790 28- 4262 - 703 -70 28710S 6965 28- 4504 - 702 -70 6215 10- 4540 - 560 -56 8957 5929- 10- 4540 - 560 -56 9111 6984 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -07 -90 PAGE 3 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 127735 04/24/90 80.00 DIESEL INJECTN SPE CALIBRATION 10- 4540 - 560 -56 8779 5929 1,282.98 * 127736 04/24/90 25.00 MORRELL TRANSFER INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 125148 25.00 * 127737 04/24/90 43.15 SILVER LAKE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 4105 5305 43.15 * 127738 04/24/90 25.00 BOB CONNOLLY PERFOMANCE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 25.00 * 127739 04/24;90 25.00 PHYLLIS HAWYA PERFOMANCE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 25.00 * 127740 04/24/90 25.00 MARIAN ALSTAD PERFOMANCE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 25.00 * 127741 04/24/90 25.00 KEN GRINDELAND PERFOMANCE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 25.00 * 127742 04/24/90 30.00 JUDY LIEBER PERFORMANCE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30.00 * 127743 04/24/90 25.00 PAT MENEELY PERFORMANCE 30- 4224 - 781-78 25.00 * 127744 04/24/90 25.00 MARIAN ALSTAD PERFORMANCE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 25.00 * 127745 04/24/90 80.00 JAMES TOENSING PERFORMANCE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 80.00 * 127746 04/24/90 25,.00 MARGARET GUST PERFORMANCE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 25.00 * 127747 04/24/90 25.00 AGNES FINE PERFORMANCE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 25.00 * 127748 04/24/90 25.00 BOB CONNOLLY PERFORMANCE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 25.00 * 127749 04/24/90 40.00 WEST STAR PACKAGE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 507 -50 705164 7033 40.00 * * * * * ** * * * -CKS 127751 04/24/90 39.50 SLIDE LOCK TOOL CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 420 -42 39.50 *. 127752 04/24/90 .50.00 KEVIN ROFIDAL MEETING EXPENSES 10- 4206 - 430 -42 50.00 * 127753 04/24/90 62.16 AMERICANA INN CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 68022 62.16 * 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -07 -90 PAGE CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 127754 04/24/90 45.00 CELLULAR ONE SALES GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 6774 45.00 127755 04/24/90 16.95 POLCE MARKSMAN ASSN DUES /SUBSCRIPTION 10- 4204 - 420 -42 16.95 127756 04/24/90 27.00 TC DICTATION SERV GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 14818 7121 27.00 * 127757 04/24/90 I 190.00 N MEMORIAL MED CTR CONT ED 10-4202- 420 -42 190.00 * 127758 04/24/90 255.00 G &J PATCH /PIN UNIFORMS 10- 4266 - 420 -42 1581 6237 255.00 * 127759 04/24/90 15.00 NATL REGISTRY TRAINING 10- 4202 - 420 -42 15.00 * 127760 04/24/90 470.00 BROADCAST MUSIC INC LICENSE FEE 30- 4204 - 781 -78, 470.00 * 127761 04/24/90 200.00 MARK FOSSUM SERVICES 27- 4288 - 664 -66 200.00 * 127762 04/24/90 71.54 MPLS SPOKESMAN ADVERTISING 29- 4600 - 721 -72 5463 7215 71.54 * 127763 04/24/90 255.00 ELIZABETH COX AMBULANCE REFUND 10- 3180 - 000 -00 255.00 * 127764 04/24/90 355.00 JOYCE BECHIK AMBULANCE REFUND 10- 3180 - 000 -00 355.00 * 127765 04/24/90 20.00 HUSAM KHALIL REFUND 30- 3505 - 000 -00 20.00 * - 127766 04/24/90 42.70 EDINA LIQUOR DINNER MEETING 10- 4206 - 100 -10 127766 04/24/90 52.94 EDINA LIQUOR VOLUNTEER RECPTN 10- 4500 - 500 -50 95.64 * - 127767 04/24/90 232.54 MN PREVEN REC CTR BROCHURES 10- 4280 - 504 -50 7204 232.54 * 127768 04/24/90 79.74 DC SALES CO AIR FILTERS 27- 4540- 667 -66 548314 7051 79.74 * 127769 04/24/90 331.99 DANIEL SMITH COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 6904 127769 04/24/90 331.99- DANIEL SMITH COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 6904 127769 04/24/90 331.99 DANIEL SMITH COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 6904 331.99 " 127770 05/01/90 62.00 CADY COMMUNICATION TELEPHONE REPAIR 27- 4256- 662 -66 31746 7435 127770 04/24/90 938.00 CADY COMMUNICATION TELEPHONE 27- 4256 - 662 -66 31729 6251 1,000.00 4 J' 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 127771 04/24/90 520.00 ABP MIDWEST INC VOLUNTEER RECPTN 520.00 * 127772 04/24/90 100.00 STEVE SCHWIRTZ GENERAL SUPPLIES 100.00 * 127773 04/24/90 100.00 EVERHOT MFG CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 127773 04/24/90 28.03 EVERHOT MFG CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 128.03 * 127774 04/24/90 170.00 SOUTHWESTERN FIRE SCHOOL FEE 170.00 * 127775 04/24/90 31.90 ALEXANDER GENERAL SUPPLIES 31.90 * 127776 04/24/90 358.80 TRIAD COMM TRAINING PROGRAM 358.80 * 127777 04/24/90 488.40 JOANNA L FOOTE TEMP EMPLOYEE 488.40 * 127778 04/24/90 16.66 VETERAN ADVERTISING - 127778 04/24/90 16.66 VETERAN ADVERTISING 127778 04/24/90 16.68 VETERAN ADVERTISING 50.00 * 127779 04/24/90 41.66 THE CHIEF OF POLICE ADVERTISING 127779 04/24/90 41.68 THE CHIEF OF POLICE ADVERTISING 127779 04/24/90 41.66 THE CHIEF OF POLICE ADVERTISING 125.00 * 127780 04/24/90 50.00 TOM MULLIN GENERAL SUPPLIES 50.00 * .127781 04/24/90 36.22 FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL DRUGS 36.22 * 127782 04/26/90 139.70 FRIDEN ALCATEL FOLDER MAINT 139.70 * 127783 04/26/90 875.00 METRO FIRE EQUIP HURST TOOL PARTS 875.00 * 127784 04/26/90 380.00 COLLEGE OF ST THOMAS MGMT SEMINAR 380.00 * 127785 04/26/90 100.00 MN TRADITIONAL PERFORMANCE 100.00 * 127786 04/26/90 75.00 VORPAL SWORD DANCE PERFORMANCE 75.00 * 127787 04/26/90 100.00 SWINGN SQUARES PERFORMANCE 05 -07 -90 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4500 - 500 -50 531289 7212 30- 4504 - 782 -78 7298 30- 4504 - 782 -78 7299 30- 4504 - 782 -78 7299 10- 4202 - 440-44 6064 10- 4504 - 440 -44 2930 6063 10- 4608 - 440 -44 6065 12- 4120 - 434 -43 6914, 50- 4214 - 822 -82 50- 4214 - 842-84 50 -4214- 862 -86 50- 4214 - 822 -82 50- 4214 - 842 -84 50- 4214 - 862 -86 10- 4504- 600 -60 10- 4510 - 440 -44 286759 10- 4290 - 510 -51 10-4540- 440 -44 1531 6075 50- 4202 - 840 -84 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224- 781 -78 4" 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK N0. DATE 127788 127788 127789 127790 127791 127792 127793 127794 127795 127796 127796 127787 *** *.* 127799 127800 127801 127802 127803 127804 127805 04/26/90 04/30/90 04/26/90 04/26/90 04/26/90 04/26/90 04/26/90 04/26/90 04/26/90 04/26/90 04/30/90 04/26/90 04/30/90 04/30/90 04/30/90 04/"0/90 04/30/90 04/30/90 04/30/90 AMOUNT 100.00 * 1,020.00 1,620.00 2,640.00 * 120.80 120.80 * - 39.61 39.61 * 25.00 25.00 * 30.73 30.73 * 123.95 123.95 * 25.00 25.00 * 15.00 15.00 * 9,789.00 14,892.00 24,681.00 * 2,019.82 2.019.82 * 75.00 75.00 * 190.00 190.00 * 750.00 750.00 * 150.00 150.00 * 438.50 438.50 * 104.95 104.95 * 25.00 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ROBERT A ELLER ASSO ROBERT A ELLER ASSO VALLEY VIEW ASSOC STEVE STROH MICHAEL SIITARI JOY MALTBY NATIONAL BUSINESS A.T.O.M STATE TREASURER PERKINS LANDSCAPE PERKINS LANDSCAPE THE WAVE CAR WASHES FRANK TOUGAS COLLEGE OF ST THOMAS EDINA COMMUNITY LOTUS DEVELOPMENT EM JOHNSON BORLAND INTERNL DONNA WALFSON CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION GENERAL SUPPLIES CONT ED TRAINING CONT ED CHAIRS MEETING EXPENSES LICENSE CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION CAR WASHES PERFORMANCE CONFERENCE DOS CLASS LOTUS 123 GENERAL SUPPLIES QUATTRO PRO REFUND 05 -07 -90 PAGE 6 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 27- 1300 - 004 -00 60- 1300 - 016 -20 30- 4504- 782 -78 6338 10- 4202 - 420 -42 10- 4202 - 420 -42 10- 4202 - 420 -42 10- 4901 - 510 -51 10- 4206 - 420 -42 40- 4202 - 809 -80 60- 1300 - 016 -20 6962 60 -1300- 016 -20 7134 10- 4296 - 560 -56 7294 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4202 - 781 -78 7895 7403 10- 4802 - 510 -51 5892 10- 4504 - 510 -51 27- 4504 - 664 -66 3766 7353 10- 4504 - 510 -51 10- 3500 - 000 -00 * * * -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA. CHECK NO. DATE 04/30/90 04/30/90 04/30/90 04/30/90 04/30/90 ,04/30/90 04/30/90 04/30/90 04/30/90 04/30/90 04/30/90 04/30/90 05/01/90 05/01/90 05/01/90 05/01/90 05/01/90 05/01/90 05/01/90 05/01/90 AMOUNT 25.00 39.40 39.40 * 35.31 35.31 * 34.83 34.83 * 35.31 35.31 * 90.00 90.00 * 504.00 504.00 * 124.25 124.25 * 302.78 302.78 * 25.00 50.43 75.43 * 45.90 45.90 * 30.00 30.00 * 198.00 198.00 * 200.00 200.00 * 53.00 53.00 * 48.17 48.17 575.00 575.00 52.50 52.50 52.50 157.50 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ANNE SMABEY BERT WILLMORE MARIA CREMER GERALD CARLSON IAFC GENCORP POLYMER SLOPE INDICATOR CO AUSTIN HARDWARE BOB KOJETIN BOB KOJETIN JOHN KEPRIOS GREG POULTON TC MUSICIANS UNION ARC OF HENN CTY PRENTICE HALL MARIPOSA PUBLISHING MICHAEL T HANSON VFW POST #5555 VFW POST #5555 VFW POST #5555 REFUND REFUND REFUND REFUND DUES TENNIS BALLS REPAIR PARTS PARTS REGISTRATION REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT PERFORMANCE REIMBURSEMENT BOOKS HANDBOOK CONSULTANT SERV ADVERTISING ADVERTISING ADVERTISING 05 -07 -90 PAGE 7 ACCOUNT NO. INV.. # P.O. # MESSAGE 40- 3800 - 000 -00 40- 3800 - 000 -00 40- 3800 - 000 -00 40- 3800 - 000 -00 10- 4204 - 440 -44 10- 4504 - 623 -62 44689 7211 40- 4540 - 801 -80 034658 7078 10- 4620 - 560 -56 82982 7084 10- 4202 - 600 -60 10- 4504 - 600 -60 10- 4504 - 600 -60 10- 4504- 627 -62 30- 4201 - 781 -78 30- 3507 - 000 -00 30- 4204 - 781 -78 10- 4502 - 140 -14 18313 7425 10- 4201 - 490 -49 5759 7421 50- 4214 - 822 -82 147919 50- 4214 - 842 -84 147919 50- 4214 - 862 -86 147919 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 127823 05/01/90 100.00 RICK ZACZEK OPEN SPACE MAPS 100.00 * 127824 05/01/90 224.00 MIDWEST LANDSCAPING TREE REPLACEMENT 224.00 * 127825 05/01/90 180.00 ROGER GRONLUND EXHIBIT FEE 180.00 * 127826 05/01/90 100.00 PAT GREER EXHIBIT FEE 100.00 * 127827 05/01/90 875.00 LINDA KOZAK SERVICES 875.00 * 127828 05/01/90 50.00 DIANE RAINS PERFORMANCE 50.00 * 127829 05/01/90 60.00 BECKY BROM PERFORMANCE 60.00 * 127830 05/01/90 75.00 CHARLES LUMRICK PERFORMANCE 75.00 * 127831 05/01/90 285.00 THE DESIGN GROUP GENERAL SUPPLIES 285.00 * 127832 05/01/90 2.63 COUNTS MED EQUIP MED SUPPLIES 127832 05/01/90 26.88 COUNTS MED EQUIP MED SUPPLIES 29.51 * 127833 1 05/01/90 285.00 GRAFIX SHOPPE LETTERING /BLAZER 285.00 * 127834 05/01/90 61.06 SYLVESTER SCHWARTZ CONT ED 61.06 * 127835 05/01/90 75.00 N.T.O.A. DUES 75.00 * 127836 05/01/90 50.00 AFFILIATED EM VET PRO.SERV 50.00 * 127837 05/01/90 300.00 CITY OF ST PAUL CONT ED 300.00 * 127838 05/01/90 127.50 AEC ENGINEERING PRO SERV ENG 127838 05/01/90 172.80 AEC ENGINEERING PRO SERV ENG 300.30 * 127839 05/01/90 41.70 EFS FREIGHT 41.70 * 127840 05/01/90 105.84 • SETON NAME. PLATE CO ID STRIPS 05 -07 -90 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4504 - 624 -62 7431 10- 4560- 644 -64 1692 7432 30- 3501 - 000 -00 30- 3501 - 000 -00 30- 4201 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4504 - 783 -78 1393 7317 10- 4510 - 440 -44 100635 5059 10- 4510 - 440 -44 102867 5059 10- 4248 - 440 -44 2771 6073 . 10- 4202 - 420 -42 10- 4204 - 420 -42 10- 4201 - 470 -47 208 10- 4202 - 420 -42 017614 40- 4201 - 800 -80 40- 4201 - 800 -80 27- 4516 - 661 -66 647895 5982 27- 4504 - 661 -66 6967 8 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 127841 05/01/90 127842 05/01/90 127843 05/01/90 127844 05/01/90 127845 05/01/90 127A01 04/24/90 127A01 04/24/90 127A01 04/24/90 127A01• 04/24/90 * * * * ** 127Ai2 04/30/90 k * x k 127A16 04/24/90 127A19 04/30/90 127A19 04/30/90 127A19 04/30/90 * * * * ** 127A21 04/24/90 k * * * ** 127A27 04/24/90 * * * * ** 127A29 * * * * ** 04/24/90 AMOUNT 105.84 225.00 225.00 230.00 230.00 * 298.00 298.00 * 24.40 24.40 393.00* 253.75- 200.00 .88 175.50 122.63 175.00. 175.00 140.50 140.50 201.47 201.47 201.47- 201.47 185.50 185.50 * 26.78 26.78 * 134.25 134.25 * CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION JOHNSTON SALES /SERV VACUUM JP FOOD SERVICE INC PLASTIC CANS HIGH SCHOOL HIGH 5 ADVERTISING TC PICTURE FRAMING PICTURE STATE SUPPLY CO. REPAIR PUMP 3M CO CREDIT 3M CO SIGNS 3M CO SIGNS 3M CO SIGNS ACME WINDOW CLEAN ADIRONDACK DIRECT ADVON ADVON ADVON ADT SECURITY SYS. ART GOKEY ALBINSON WINDOW CLEANING EQUIP REPLACE LAUNDRY /UNIFOPRMS LAUNDRY /UNIFORMS LAUNDRY /UNIFOPRMS ALARM SERVICE MILEAGE BLUE PRINTING 05-07 -90 PAGE 9 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 27- 4504 - 662 -66 7388 27- 4504 - 667 -66 916031 7482 27- 4214- 667 -66 506 7480 27- 4504 - 662 -66 457930 6959 28- 4248 -- 702 -70 31340 6674--* -CKS 10- 4542 - 325 -30 10- 4542 - 325 -30 10- 4542- 325 -30 5306 10- 4542 - 325 -30 ** *-CKS 10- 4504- 390 -30 7339 * ** -CKS 10- 4901 - 420 -42 187713 * ** -CKS 30- 4262 - 782 -78 892396 7406 30- 4262 - 782 -78 892396 7406 30- 4262 - 782 -78 892396 7406 * ** -CKS 30- 4304 - 782 -78 462232 7296 * ** -CKS 40- 4208 - 806 -80 * ** -CKS 10- 4570 - 260 -26 639675 5352 * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 318 -30 CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 10- 4504 - 318 -30 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 127Ai9 04/24/90 43.20 10- 4248 - 560 -56 ALTERNATOR REBUILD D CELL BATTERY 127A39 04/24/90 79.80 41- 45-18- 900 -90 ALTERNATOR REBUILD STARTER 127A39 04/30/90 124.10 ALTERNATOR REBUILD BLADE 127A39 04/30/90 148.42 ALTERNATOR REBUILD GENERAL SUPPLIES 395.52 127A40 05/01/90 114.94 ACTION MAILING SERV MAILING 114.94 1-7A41 04/24/90 191.30 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE MEAT 191.30 127A43 04/30/90 101.00 AM LASER CUT GRAFIX PARTS k k * * k k 101.00 127A53 04/2.4/90 175.01 AMERICAN SHARECOM TELEPHONE 175.01 127A67 04/30/90 49.25 AQUA ENGINEERING NOZZLE HEADS 49.25 * 127A67 AQUA ENGINEERING 12;A;@ 04/24/90 19.95 AGP6WPlD GOFFiE GENERAL SUPPLIES 19.95 * 127A96 04/24/90 131.50 AUTOMOBILE SERV CTR REPAIR WORK k k R k * 131.50 * 127A98 04/30/90 84.95 AVR INC CALCIUM CHLORIDE 127A98 04/30/90 106.45 AVR INC CALCIUM CHLORIDE 191.40 127803 04/30/90 29.57 BENSON SAFETY GLASSES 127603 04/24/90 22.26 BENSON SAFETY GLASSES 127803 04/24/90 29.15 BENSON SAFETY GLASSES * * k k 80.98 127605 05/01/90 25.00 BACH -BILL POSTAGE 127B05 04/26/90 18.48 BACH -BILL GENERAL SUPPLIES ACCOUNT NO. IN 10- 4504 - 301 -30 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10- 4580- 301 -30 40- 4504 - 801 -80 10- 4290 - 510 -51 27- 4624 - 663 -66 10- 4620 - 560 -56 10- 4256 - 510 -51 05 -07 -90 PAGE 10 J. # P.O. # MESSAGE 7002 7079 10987 7107 7006 7182 7005 7144 3227 5506 * ** -CKS 6537 7286 * ** -CKS 10- 4262 - 301 -30 298302 10- 4262 - 646 -64 292614 10- 4642- 301 -30 293717 30- 4290 - 781 -78 30- 4504 - 782 -78 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 318 -30 24520 7281 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 318 -30 24466 7011 * ** -CKS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 7175 6931 * ** -CKS 41- 45-18- 900 -90 19958 41- 4518 - 900 -90 20084 10- 4262 - 301 -30 298302 10- 4262 - 646 -64 292614 10- 4642- 301 -30 293717 30- 4290 - 781 -78 30- 4504 - 782 -78 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -07 -90 PAGE 11 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 127605 04/26/90 77.77 BACH -BILL OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516- 781 -78 121.25 * k k k * * k * ** -CKS 127607 04/24/90 37.00 BADGER METER INC FREIGHT /METER 40- 4540 - 807 -80 624363 5189 37.00 * k k k k k k * ** -CKS 127618 04/30/90 110.28- BATTERY WAREHOUSE CREDIT 10- 4540 - 560 -56 14480 127618 04/24/90 81.28 BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 11603 6102 127618 04/24/90 207.00 BATTERY WAREHOUSE BATTERY 10- 4540 - 560 -56 11466 7149 127618 04/30/90 330.84 BATTERY WAREHOUSE BATTERIES 10- 4540 - 560 -56 12409 6943 508.84 i k k k k w k * ** -CKS 127622 04/24/90 102.70 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 27- 4630 - 663 -66 5505 127622 04/24/90 382.40 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 27- 4630 - 667 -66 7198 485.10 * k k * * k * ** -CKS 127B24 05/01/90 259.48 BLEVENS CONS SUPPLY COST /GOODS SOLD 28- 4624 - 703 -70 779901 7114 259.48 * k k k k* k ' * ** -CKS 127627 04/24/90 169.50 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 50- 4626 - 822 -82 127627 04/24/90 317.50 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 50- 4626 - 842 -84 127827 04/24/90 289.00 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 50- 4626 - 862 -86 776.00 k k k* k k • * ** -CKS 127630 04/24/90 4.40 BERTELSON BROS. INC. BINDER 10- 4504 - 160 -16 561683 127830 04/24/90 35.91 BERTELSON BROS. INC. DISKETTES /BINDERS 10- 4504 - 160 -16 560138 127630 05/01/90 30.00 BERTELSON BROS. INC. ENVELOPES 10- 4504 - 260 -26 561116 127830 04/26/90 21.73 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 127630 04/26/90 23.00 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 561065 127630 04/30/90 90.79 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 420 -42 563585 127630 04/30/90 10.00 BERTELSON BROS. INC. CALCULATOR 10- 4504 - 420 -42 563576 127B30 04/24/90 3.35 BERTELSON BROS. INC. PUSH PINS 10- 4504 - 440 -44 560138 127630 04/24/90 98.41 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 490 -49 545763 127630 04/24/90 8.54 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 490 -49 127830 04/24/90 49.42 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 490 -49 560134 127630 04/24/90 135.41 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 560138 127830 04/24/90 41.46 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 561683 127630 04/30/90 32.40 BERTELSON BROS. INC. LEGAL PADS 10- 4504 - 510 -51 563576 127830 04/24/90 137.92 BERTELSON BROS. INC. CHAIRMAT 10- 4504 - 540 -54 557346 6805 127630 04/24/90 4.80 BERTELSON BROS. INC. MARKERS 10- 4516 - 140 -14 560138 127630 04/24/90 89.31 BERTELSON BROS.' INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 440 -44 558089 6067 127B30 04/30/90 41.20 BERTELSON BROS. INC. CHALK BOARD 27- 4516 - 667 -66 561998 7315 127630 04/24/90 2.87 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 27- 4516 - 667 -66 560313 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -07 -90 PAGE 12 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 127630 04/24/90 4.38 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 6742 127630 04/30/90 39.36 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516- 781 -78 563770 7316 905.16 * * * * ** ** *-CKS 127632 04/26/90 117.25 BEST LOCK OF MPLS PADLOCKS 10- 4504 - 646 -64 3416 7076 127B32 04/30/90 40.81 BEST LOCK OF MPLS PADLOCKS 10- 4504- 646 -64 3605 7418 127B32 04/24/90 34.50 BEST LOCK OF MPLS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10-4504-646-64-3172 6854 127632 04/24/90 34.50 BEST LOCK OF MPLS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 3174 6921 127832 04/24/90 34.50 BEST LOCK OF MPLS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 3173 7140 127632 05/01/90 8.23 BEST LOCK OF MPLS KEYS 27- 4504 - 661 -66 3584 7119 127632 05/01/90 5.13 BEST LOCK OF MPLS KEYS 27- 4540 - 667 -66 3788 7481 274.92 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 127B61 04/24/90 1,200.00 BOUSTEAD ELEC & MFG. CONTRACTED REPAIRS 40- 4248 - 801 -80 280550 6938 1,200.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 127B72 04/24/90 175.75 BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE FUTURE FORUM 10- 4206 - 500 -50 127672 04/24/90 147.74 BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE VOLUNTEER RECPTN 10- 4500 - 500 -50 323.49 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 127679 04/24/90 482.94 BROCK WHITE COLUMN FORM 41- 4504- 900 -90 305580 6858 482.94 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 127681 05/01/90 1,797.59 BRW INC. PRO SERV ENG 60- 1300 - 290 -04 57519 1,797.59 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 127001 04/24/90 90.16 C & S DISTRIBUTING COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 104107 6905 127C01 04/24/90 278.36 C & S DISTRIBUTING COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624- 613 -61 103704.6757 368.52 ** * * *k 127OO8 i;7L0Q"QQ 3:22 06 MERMFER 14-TER P'-'MP 1.9 -:5-49 569 56 P66891 7940 * ** -CKS * * * * ** * ** -CKS 127C13 04/24/90 116.00 CASH REGISTER SALES CASH REGISTER TAPES 27- 4516 - 661 -66 398717 6895 116.00 * * *k ** * ** -CKS 127C17 04/24/90 135.00 CDP SERV CONTR /EQUIP 10- 4288 - 420 -42 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 127C18 04/24/90 127C18 05/01/90 127C18 05/01/90 127C18 04/24/90 127C18 05/01/90 * * * * ** 127C25 127C25 127C25 127C25 127C29 * * * * ** 127C32 127C33 127C33 127C33 127C33 127C33 127C33 127C34 127C38 127C38 127C38 127C44 127C61 127C61 127C61 04/24/90 04/30/90 04/24/90 04/30/90 04/30/90 AMOUNT 135.00 30.50. LAKE 88.00 DINNER MEETING 43.00 LAKE 28.95 FLOWERS 18.50 LAKE 208.95 FLOWERS 64.60 LAKE 228.00 SYMPATHY PLANT 158.75 LAKE 47.32 FLOWERS 498.67 490.00 EDINA 490.00 27.10 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION CEDAR LAKE FLORAL DINNER MEETING CEDAR LAKE FLORAL FLOWERS CEDAR LAKE FLORAL FLOWERS CEDAR LAKE FLORAL SYMPATHY PLANT CEDAR LAKE FLORAL FLOWERS CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS 05/01/90 116.03 WATER FRAN CALLAHAN WATER 116.03 WATER 10- 4258 - 646 -64 WATER 04/24/90 27.10 50- 4258 - 861 -86 CITY OF EDINA 04/24/90 134.16 CITY.OF EDINA 04/24/90 187.48 CITY OF EDINA 04/24/90 27.10 CITY OF EDINA 04/24/90 44.72 CITY OF EDINA 04/24/90 27.10 CITY OF EDINA 447.66 05/01/90 19.78 CITY OF RICHFIELD 19.78 04/24/90 162.50 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP 04/24/90 205.55 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP 04/24/90 292.00 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP 660.05. 05/01/90 94.00 COCA COLA BOTTLING 94.00 04/30/90 189.00 COMTECH INC. 04/24/90 58.50 COMTECH INC. 04/30/90 886.60 COMTECH INC. 05 -07 -90 PAGE 13 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4206 - 100 -10 7206 10- 4500 - 500 -50 527422 7426 10- 4504 - 100 -10 7426 10- 4504 - 100 -10 527681 7206 10- 4504 - 140 -14 7426 * ** -CKS AD FOR BIDS 10- 4210 - 140 -14 111579 AD FOR BIDS 10- 4210 - 140 -14 111657 AD FOR BIDS 10- 4210 - 140 -14. 111152 ADVERTISING 30- 4214 - 781 -78 112330 7405' * ** -CKS PRINTING 10- 4201 - 627 -62 8471 7381 * ** -CKS MILEAGE /APRIL 10- 4208 - 480 -48 WATER 10- 4258 - 440 -44 WATER 10- 4258 - 520 -52 WATER 10- 4258 - 540 -54 WATER 10- 4258 - 646 -64 WATER 50- 4258 - 821 -82 WATER 50- 4258 - 861 -86 LIGHT /POWER 41- 4252 - 900 -90 * ** -CKS SCOTT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 440 -44 55877 6060 PARTS 10- 4540- 440 -44 55877 6060 AIR CYLINDER 10- 4901 - 440 -44 52419 6059 * ** -CKS COKE 27- 4504 - 663 -66 PROF, SERVICES 30- 4201 - 782 -78 12082 7401 PROF: SERVICES 30- 4201 - 782 -78 12035 7297 GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 11907 6145 *** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 127C87 05/01/90 127087 04/24/90 127087 04/30/90 127C87 04/24/90 127C87 04/24/90 127C92 04/24/90 127C93 04/30/90 x * * *x* 127D07 0- 4/24/90 127Q07 04/30/90 i27D07 04/24/90 127D27 05/01/90 * * * * ** 127D31 04/24/90 * * k x 127D33 05/01/90 127D33 05/01/90 127D78 05/01/90 127D79 04/24/90 127D79 04/24/90 127D85 04/24/90 CHECK REGISTER 05 -07 -90 PAGE 14 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 1,134.10 * ** -CKS 50.45- CURTIN MATHESON SCI CREDIT 10 -4504- 482 -48 6611 519.39 CURTIN MATHESON SCI LAB SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 482 -48 7131 71.84 CURTIN MATHESON SCI LAB SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 482 -48 7131 52.84 CURTIN MATHESON SCI MEDIA 10- 4504 - 482 -48 6611 80.32 CURTIN MATHESON SCI LAB SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 482 -48 6611 673.94 * ** -CKS 253.95 CUSTOM FIRE APP GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 440 -44 3003 6074 253.95 * 30.00 CERT HYD SPEC KIT FOR PUMP 10- 4540 - 560 -56 71525 7165 30.00 * * ** -CKS 146.56 D.C. HEY CO. CONTRACTED REPAIRS 23- 4248 - 612 -61 163874 48.13 D.C: HEY CO. SERVICE CONTRACT 30- 4288 - 781 -78 167680 7400 159.30 D.C. HEY CO. OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 165769 7044 353.99 * * ** -CKS 198.22 DAVE S FOOD WAGON DAIRY 27- 4624 - 663-66 5508 198.22 * * ** -CKS 41.56 DAVIES WATER EQUIP TOOLS 40- 4580 - 803 -80 2227 6922 41.56 * ** -CKS 162.75 DAVIS- EUGENE SERVICES 10- 4201 - 600 -60 26.01 DAVIS- EUGENE MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 600 -60 188.76 * * ** -CKS 1,200.00 DEDE HENSEL PRO FEES /SHOW 28- 4224 - 701 -70 1,200.00 * 5,944-.27 DORSEY & WHITNEY LEGAL 10- 4218- 220 -22 372516 8,240.70 DORSEY.& WHITNEY LEGAL 10- 4218- 220 -22 372517 14,184.97 * ** -CKS 81.48 DUFFEY PAPER CO. PAPER 10- 4504 - 510 -51 B7884 6968 81.48 * 1990 CITY OF EDINA * ** -CKS 30- 4288 - 782 -78 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 3168 6946 * * ** ** 127D90 04/24/90 34.95 * ** -CKS * * * * ** 34.95 127E02 05/01/90 805.36 127E02 05/01/90 253.28 * ** -CKS 127E02 04/24/90 475.05 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 1,533.69 127E14 04/24/90 372.00 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 107041 6577 372.00 * * * ** ** * ** -CKS 41- 4552 - 900 -90 1717 6867 127E20 04/24/90 85..00 85.00 * 127E21 04/24/90 1,800.00 1,800.00 * 127E33 04/24/90 13.00 13.00 127E41 04/24/90 9,527.85 * * * * ** 9,527.85 127E71 05/01/90 109.00 * * * * ** .109.00 127E75 04/26/90 300.00 300.00 127E81 04/24/90 93.25 93.25 127E94 04/24/90 700.00 127E94 04/24/90 1,644.00 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION DYNAMED_ FIRST AID SUPPLIES E KRAEMER & SONS INC GENERAL SUPPLIES E KRAEMER & SONS INC GENERAL SUPPLIES E KRAEMER & SONS INC ROCK -FILL EARL F. ANDERSON SIGNS ECOLAB PEST ELIM. SERVICE CONTRACT ECOMARC INC ODOR CONTROL EDINA CHAM OF COM CHAMBER LUNCH EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS RENTAL ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY UNIFORMS EMPLOYEES CLUB SUPPLIES ENGINE PARTS SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS STORM SEWER GRATES STORM SEWER GRATES ESS BROS & SONS ESS BROS & SONS 05 -07 -90 PAGE 15 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 4510 - 440 -44 552463 6061 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 314 -30 9582 40- 4504 - 803 -80 9582 41- 4518 - 900 -90 9357 1045 * ** -CKS 10- 4542 - 325 -30 95676 6864 * ** -CKS 30- 4288 - 782 -78 P59289 7241 40- 4504- 801 -80 3168 6946 * ** -CKS 10- 4206 - 140 -14 * ** -CKS 10- 4282 - 625 -62 * ** -CKS 10- 4642 - 420 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 500 -50 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 107041 6577 * ** -CKS 41- 4552 - 900 -90 1717 6867 41- 4552- 900 -90 1733 6948 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT BROS & SONS 127E94 04/24/90 1,700.00 CHAIR *kk * *k RITE CONTROL 4,044.00 * 127F02 04/24/90 251.85 ELECTRIC TOOLS FOWLER 251.85 * kk *lock G ANDERSON PAINT LIZ 127F11 04/24/90 2,749.80 TRAIN SERV 127F11 04/26/90 2,250.10 CONT ED x k k * k TRAIN SERV 4,999.90 GOVT 127F47 04/24/90 113.30ii;.2;- TRAIN SERV 127F47 04/26/90 1 23.10 REPAIR_ kkkkk k COMMUNICATIONS 136.40* i3e --48 GEN. 127F50 04/24/90 55.43 55.43 k * k * k k 127G02 04/24/90 930.00 k k k k* k 930.00 127G09 04/24/90 100.00 127G09 04/24/90 100.00 127G09 04/24/90 225.00 127G09 05/01/90 225.00 127G09 05/01/90 225.00 kkkkk k 875.00 127G24 04/30/90 54.60 127G24 04/30/90 89.22 127G24 04/24/90 2.19 kkkkk k 146.01 * 127G52 04/30/90 40.70 kkkkk k 40.70 * 127G57 04/30/90 212.00 212.00 * A. 300DIN CO. REPAIR PARTS GOPHER OIL CO. FLOOR DRI 05 -07 -90 PAGE 16 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 41- 4552 - 900 -90 1751 7029 * ** -CKS 10- 4901- 510 -51 46251 7203 * ** -CKS 40- 4622 - 805 -80 137314 1670 40- 4622 - 805 -80 137782 1670 * ** -CKS 27- 4504 - 664 -66 43450 6982 27- 4540 - 664 -66 51940 7309 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 74218 6570 * ** -CKS 30- 4201 - 781 -78 * ** -CKS 10- 4202 - 420 -42 7268 10- 4202 - 420 -42 7270 10- 4202 - 420 -42 7275 10- 4202 - 420 -42 7503 10- 4202 - 420 -42 7495 i * ** -CKS 10- 4294 - 560 -56 64558 10- 4294 - 560 -56 64367 10- 4504 - 440 -44 63814 * ** -CKS 27- 4540- 664 -66 7293 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 560 -56 399217 7154 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ESS BROS & SONS MANHOLE ADJ RING FACILITY SYSTEMS CHAIR FEED RITE CONTROL WATER CHEMICALS FEED RITE CONTROL WATER CHEMICALS FOWLER ELECTRIC TOOLS FOWLER ELECTRIC REPAIR PARTS FRED G ANDERSON PAINT LIZ GEREBI SERVICES GOVT TRAIN SERV CONT ED GOVT TRAIN SERV CONT ED GOVT TRAIN SERV CONT ED GOVT TRAIN SERV CONT ED GOVT TRAIN SERV CONT ED GEN. COMMUNICATIONS REPAIR_ GEN. COMMUNICATIONS ANTENNA /ACCESSORY GEN. COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES 300DIN CO. REPAIR PARTS GOPHER OIL CO. FLOOR DRI 05 -07 -90 PAGE 16 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 41- 4552 - 900 -90 1751 7029 * ** -CKS 10- 4901- 510 -51 46251 7203 * ** -CKS 40- 4622 - 805 -80 137314 1670 40- 4622 - 805 -80 137782 1670 * ** -CKS 27- 4504 - 664 -66 43450 6982 27- 4540 - 664 -66 51940 7309 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 74218 6570 * ** -CKS 30- 4201 - 781 -78 * ** -CKS 10- 4202 - 420 -42 7268 10- 4202 - 420 -42 7270 10- 4202 - 420 -42 7275 10- 4202 - 420 -42 7503 10- 4202 - 420 -42 7495 i * ** -CKS 10- 4294 - 560 -56 64558 10- 4294 - 560 -56 64367 10- 4504 - 440 -44 63814 * ** -CKS 27- 4540- 664 -66 7293 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 560 -56 399217 7154 1990 CITY OF EDINA 05 -07 -90 CHECK NO'. DATE AMOUNT ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # 127G62 05/01/90 102.00 * ** -CKS 102.00 * * * * * k 5517 127G72 04/24/90 30.00 * ** 'CKS * * * k * k CONTRACTED REPAIRS 30 00 * 127G79 05/01/90 18,019.00 * k * k k k * ** -CKS 18,019.00 * 127H09 04/24/90 561.00 561.00 * 127H23 04/26/90 197,500.00 52012 6929 127H23 04/26/90 37,500.00 127H23 04/26/90 15,000.00 INSURANCE 10- 4260 - 510 -51 250,000.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. INSURANCE 10- 4260 - 510 -51 127H31 05/01/90 132.41 132.41 127H33 04/24/90 371.10 GENERAL SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 702 -70 2959 7031 371.10 127H34 04/24/90 21,362.92 * ** -CKS * * * * * * WORKHOUSE /JAIL 21,362.92 127H36' 04/26/90 933.65 10- 4922 - 503 -50 933.65 * * * * * * * ** -CKS HENN CTY MED CENTER 127H62 05/01/90 25.25 -23-2 127H62 04/24/90 12.55 127H62 04/30/90 57.80 10- 4504 - 140 -14 244537 95.60* 9'6e 127H63 04/24/90 472.00 HOFF - WILLIAMSON DEPOSIT STAMP 472.00 244466 CHECK REGISTER 05 -07 -90 PAGE 17 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS GRANDMA S CUPBOARD POP CORN 27- 4504 - 663 -66 5517 * ** 'CKS GARY SMIEJA CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 * ** -CKS GREUPNER -JOE LESSONS 27- 4100 - 661 -66 * ** -CKS HALLMAN HYD OIL 10- 4618 - 560 -56 52012 6929 * ** -CKS HARRIS HOMEYER CO. INSURANCE 10- 4260 - 510 -51 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. INSURANCE 10- 4260 - 510 -51 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. INSURANCE 10- 4260 - 510 -51 * ** -CKS HOLMSTEN ICE RINKS GENERAL SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 702 -70 2959 7031 * ** -CKS HENN CTY SHERIFF WORKHOUSE /JAIL 10- 4286- 220 -22 HENN COUNTY TREAS. SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 10- 4922 - 503 -50 * ** -CKS HENN CTY MED CENTER AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 10- 4510- 440 -44 758 6077 * ** -CKS HOFF - WILLIAMSON NOTARY STAMP 10- 4504 - 140 -14 244537 HOFF - WILLIAMSON GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 244342 HOFF - WILLIAMSON DEPOSIT STAMP 10- 4504 - 510 -51 244466 HOFFERS INC GLASS REPLACEMENT 10- 4540 - 390 -30 149984 6718 1990 CITY OF EDINA 60- 1300 - 016 -20 7208 CHECK REGISTER 7208 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 7395 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION * k k k * k 127H79 04/30/90 480.00 7187 HORWATH -TOM FORSTRY WORK 127H79 04/30/90 15.00 HORWATH -TOM ASSESSMENT INSP 127H79 04/30/90 84.90 HORWATH -TOM MILEAGE 579.90 kkkkkw 127H85 04/24/90 35.00 HUMPHREY RADIATOR HEATER CORE 127H85 04/24/90 26.50 HUMPHREY RADIATOR CLEAN /REPAIR 61.50 127I23 04/24/90 14.00 INDELCO CORP IRRIGATION PARTS 14.00 127I25 04/24/90 109.47 INLAND TRUCK PTS REPAIR PARTS 127I25 04/24/90 621.29 INLAND TRUCK PTS REPAIR PARTS 127I25 04/24/90 103.27- INLAND TRUCK PTS CREDIT. 127I25 04/24/90 39.22 INLAND TRUCK PTS PARTS 666.71 * * * k k * k 127I59 04/24/90 113.75 INTERIOR COM SYS. PHONE 127I59 04/24/90 192.40 INTERIOR COM SYS. TELEPHONE k k k * k 306.15 * 127I78 04/24/90 75.00 ISIA RIBBONS 127278 04/24/90 63.85 ISIA TEST PATCHES 138.85 *kk *kk 127J09 04/26/90 896.76 J.H. LARSON ELEC CONSTRUCTION 127J09 04/30/90 2,242.65 J.H. LARSON ELEC CONSTRUCTION k k * * * k 3,139.41 127J23 04/30/90 26.40 JR JOHNSON SUP GENERAL SUPPLIES k k k k k k 26.40 127J27 G4/30/90 25.74 JERRYS FOODS GENERAL SUPPLIES 127J27 04/30/90 64.73 JERRYS FOODS GENERAL SUPPLIES 90.47 05 -07 -90 PAGE 18 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 644 -64 10- 4201 - 980 -64 10- 4208 - 644 -64 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10- 4540 - 560 -56 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 643 -64 49971 6789 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 6866 10- 4540 - 560 -56 76001 6866 10 =4540- 560 -56 6866 10- 4540 - 560 -56 476077 6945 * ** -CKS 10- 4256 - 510 -51 026790 7207 30- 4256 - 782 -78 26982 7128 * ** -CKS 28- 4504 - 702 -70 6761 28- 4504 - 702 -70 6761 * ** -CKS 60- 1300 - 016 -20 7208 60- 1300 - 016 -20 7208 * ** -CKS 30- 4504 - 782 -78 72902 7395 * ** -CKS 23- 4504 - 611 -61 23- 4504 - 611 -61 7187 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE x x x x x x 127J-,5 04/ "0/90 127J35 04/30/90 * *x * ** 127J41 04/30/90 127J41 04/24/90 * * * * ** 127J27 i2?462 04/24/90 * * * * ** 127J74 04/24/90 127J74 04/24/90 127J74 04/24/90 127J74 04/24/90 127J74 04/24/90 127J74 04/24/90 127J74 04/24/90 *x* * ** 127J99 04/24/90 127J99 04/24/90 127J99 04/24/90 * * * * ** 127K23 04/24/90 127K23 04/24/90 * * * * ** 127K35 04/30/90 127K35 04/24/90 127K35 04/30/90 127K35 04/24/90 127K35 04/24/90 127K35 04/24/90 127K3.5 04/24/90 127K35 04/24/90 127K35 05/01/90 127K35 05/01/90 127K35 04/24/90 AMOUNT 28.00 33.67 61.67 * 424.99 333.24 758.23 * 2.97 2.97 32.00 15.20 108.90 119.68 11.15 58.21 62.80 407.94 40.00 40.00- 40.00 40.00 873.60 448.00 1,321.60 312.57 19.17 27.87 283.40 181.55 179.52 28.84 56.21 59.99 13.19 53.46 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION JERRYS PRINTING JERRYS PRINTING JIM HATCH SALES JIM HATCH SALES PUNCHED PAPER SOLICITOR PERMITS BROOMS /AXES SCOOPS JERRYS FOODS (see also 127J27) BLEACH (see also 124J74) JUSTUS LUMBER JUSTUS LUMBER JUSTUS LUMBER JUSTUS LUMBER JUSTUS LUMBER JUSTUS LUMBER JUSTUS LUMBER JANET CANTON JANET CANTON JANET CANTON KELLY SERVICES KELLY SERVICES KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT .PARTICLE BOARD MATERIAL LUMBER LUMBER LUMBER REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS LOGIS /MILEAGE LOIS /MILEAGE LOIS /MILEAGE KELLY SERVICE /ADM KELLY SERV /PERSNL OAK BOARD MATERIAL CERTIFOAM LUMBER PARTS SUPPLIES LUMBER LUMBER LUMBER LUMBER LUMBER 05 -07 -90 PAGE 19 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 4504- 510 -51 2208 10- 4600 - 140 -14 2185 10- 4580 - 301 -30 10382 6981 10- 4580 - 301 -30 10380 6992 10- 4512 - 440 -44 10- 4540 - 520 -52 10- 4540 - 520 -52 10- 4540 - 520 -52 10- 4540 - 540 -54 10- 4540 - 560 -56 40- 4540- 802 -80 40- 4540 - 802 -80 10- 4208 - 160 -16 10- 4208 - 160 -16 10- 4208 - 160 -16 10- 4201 - 140 -14 10- 4201 - 140 -14 10- 4504 - 314 -30 10- 4504 - 325 -30 10- 4540 - 540 -54 10- 4604- 646 -64 10- 4620 - 560 -56 27- 4504 - 664 -66 27- 4604 - 662 -66 27- 4604 - 662 -66 27- 4604 - 662 -66 27- 4604- 664 -66 27- 4604 - 664 -66 30454 6571 31580 6727 30656 6628 31112 6659 31725 6733 29142 6383 30302 6563 638688 7087 606259 6847 612834 7086 606715 6977 606313 6917 606628 7042 606587 6961 638795 7141 610374 7291 610507 7214 606726 7116 a * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 19.90 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 127K35 05/01/90 127K35 05/01/90 127K35 04/24/90 127K35 04/24/90 127K35 04/24/90 127K35 04/30/90 127K35 04/24/90 * * * * ** COMM 127LO2 04/24/90 * * * * ** 127L04 04/30/90 127L04 04/24/90 * * * * ** 127L22 04/24/90 127L22 04/24/90 127L28. 4/24/OG 127L23 X4/24/9 0 127L28 04/24/90 127L28 04/24/90 127L28 04/24/90 127L28 04/24/90 127L28 04/24/90 127L28 04/24/90 127L28 04/24/90 127L28 04/24/90 * * * * ** 127L30 04/24/90 127L30 04/24/90 * * * * ** 127L34 04/24/90 * * * * ** 127L52 4/26/90 127L52 04/24/90 247.40* lb 05 -07 -90 PAGE 20 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 28- 4504 - 702 -70 28- 4504 - 702 -70 28- 4504- 702 -70 40- 4540 - 802 -80 40- 4540- 802 -80 40- 4540 - 802 -80 40- 4540 - 802 -80 612871 610336 606624 606714 606366 638625 606365 7118 7199 7032 6989 7019 7108 7019 526.41 LABOR RELATIONS ASN. CHECK REGISTER 10- 4201 - 140 -14 AMOUNT 526.41 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 45.12 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 59.83 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 101.44 KNOX COMM CREDIT SHOW SUPPLIES 77.65 6980 KNOX COMM CREDIT REPAIR PARTS 9.52 KNOX COMM CREDIT REPAIR PARTS 49.00 GC SUPPLIES KNOX COMM CREDIT REPAIR PARTS 19.84 LANDSCAPE &.TURF KNOX COMM CREDIT REPAIR PARTS 1,578.17 127L52 4/26/90 127L52 04/24/90 247.40* lb 05 -07 -90 PAGE 20 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 28- 4504 - 702 -70 28- 4504 - 702 -70 28- 4504- 702 -70 40- 4540 - 802 -80 40- 4540- 802 -80 40- 4540 - 802 -80 40- 4540 - 802 -80 612871 610336 606624 606714 606366 638625 606365 7118 7199 7032 6989 7019 7108 7019 526.41 LABOR RELATIONS ASN. LABOR SERVICES 10- 4201 - 140 -14 526.41 374.01 LAHASS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 9221 6980 188.70 LAHASS PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 106326 6980 '562.71 187.50 LANDSCAPE & TURF GC SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 664 -66 4310 6487 375.00 LANDSCAPE &.TURF SEED 27- 4562 - 664 -66 4331 7004 562.50 294.83 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 6777 154.00 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 322 -30 6776 379.73 LAWSON PRODUCTS TAPE RIVET KIT 10- 4504 - 325 -30 6910 374.18 LAWSON PRODUCTS SCREWS /TAPE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 6912 419.06 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 6778 408.30 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 6911 245.52 LAWSON PRODUCTS STARTER KIT 40- 4504 - 801 -80 6104 374.75 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 6641 299.12 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 6919 70.05 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 6734 3,019.54 280.80 LAYNE MINNESOTA CO. AIR RELEASE VALVE 40- 4540 - 805 -80 11292 6807 152.16 LAYNE MINNESOTA CO. MANHOLE GASKETS 40- 4540 - 805 -80 11284 7000 432.96 15.75 LEEF BROS. INC. PRO SERVICES 15.75 * 79.80 LINJO ASSOC WATER TREATMENT 167.60 LINJO ASSOC WATER TREATMENT i6?.-6 6- * 23- 4201 - 612 -61 205963 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 30,4564- 783 - 78,409 7325 30- 4564- 783 -78 2404 7043 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT CHECK REGISTER 05 -07 -90 PAGE 21 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * * * * ** * ** -CKS 127L56 04/24/90 21.83 LINHOFF DEVELOP FILM 10- 4504 - 260 -26 169040 127L56 04/26/90 10.00 LINHOFF DEVELOPING FILM 10- 4504 - 260 -26 169689 127L56 04/24/90 54.41 LINHOFF DEVELOP FILM 10- 4504 - 260 -26 169020 127L56 04/24/90 10.75 LINHOFF DEVELOP FILM 10- 4504 - 260 -26 168978 127L56 04/26/90 31.92 LINHOFF DEVELOPING FILM 10- 4504 - 260 -26 169688 127L56 04/26/9.0 .09 LINHOFF DEVELOP FILM 10- 4504 - 260 -26 169689 127L56 04/24/90 6.75 LINHOFF FILM DEVELOPING 10- 4508- 480 -48 169126 127L56 04/24/90 20.25 LINHOFF SUPPLIES 12- 4504 - 434 -43 169307 127L56 i27656 04/24/90 94/26,'99 13..50 ;14 LINHOFF 6INNOFF PHOTO PROCESSING WATER TREATMENT 12- 4508- 434 -43 @9 4564 ;83 78 168980 2489 1325 A A 169.50* 2- 9 A * * * * ** * ** -CKS 127L60 04/24/90 3,115.49 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 10- 4233 - 160 -16 127L60 04/24/90 2,389.37 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 10- 4233 - 200 -20 127L60 04/24/90 3,419.98 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 10- 4233 - 420 -42 127L60 04/24/90 1,693.22 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 40- 4233 - 800 -80 127L60 04/24/90 566.69 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 50- 4233 - 820 -82 127L60 04/24/90 566.69 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 50- 4233 - 840 -84 127L60 04/24/90 566.68 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING 50- 4233 - 860 -86 12,318.12 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 127L66 04/30/90 4.89 LONG LAKE FORD TRACT WASHER /SEAL 10-4540-560-56'103646 7176 4.89 * * * ■ ** * ** -CKS 127M02 04/24/90 246.00 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. MAIN BROOM 10- 4534 - 310 -30 4018 6711 127M02 04/24/90 104.49 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 4091 6925 127M02 04/24/90 37.04 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. AIR COND FILTER 10- 4540 - 560 -56 4067 6915 387.53 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 127M12 04/24/00 121.48 MATHISON CO. COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 646680 6755 121.48 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 127M14 04/30/90 15.00 MAUMA SEMINAR 10- 4202 - 140 -14 15.00 * * * ** * ** -CKS 127M16 05/01/90 217.00 MCCAREN DESIGNS TREES /PLANTS /SHRUBS 30- 4660 - 782 -78 2914 7434 127M16 05/01/90 472.16 MCCAREN DESIGNS TREES /PLANTS /SHRUBS 30- 4660 - 782 -78 2915 7433 689.16 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA 401.12 M AMUNDSON CHECK REGISTER SUPPLY 05 -07 -90 PAGE 22 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 127M27 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 127M19 04/24/90 2,663.92 10- 4504 - 560 -56 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 127M19 04/24/90 204.78 MERIT MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY TOOLS 10- 4580 - 560 -56 127M19 04/24/90 176.12 04/24/90 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY TOOLS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 127M19 04/24/90 32.02 23974 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 704 -70 4,062.00 3,076.84 * FERTILIZER 10- 4558 - 642 -64 24127 * * * * ** 127M27 04/24/90 467.50 MERIT * ** -CKS 127M22 04/2:/90 451.63 6928 MCNEILUS STEEL PIPES 10- 4540 - 560 -56 57391 6796 127M22 04%24/90 451.63 •CLEANING SUPPLIES MCNEILUS STEEL BLACK PIPES 10-4620-560-56'57390 6795 127'127 05/01/90 903.26 * MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES * * * * ** * ** -CKS 127M27 04/30/90 401.12 M AMUNDSON MERIT SUPPLY PAINT /DISPENSER 10- 4504 - 540 -54 24094 7082 127M27 04/24/90 321.17 04/24/90 MERIT SUPPLY SCOTTIES /PAINT 10- 4504 - 560 -56 23983 6813 127M27 04/26/90 496.00 MERIT SUPPLY STACKING CHAIRS 10- 4504 - 646 -64 24139 7305 127M27 04/24/90 417.36 MERIT SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 23974 6800 127M27 04/26/90 4,062.00 MERIT SUPPLY FERTILIZER 10- 4558 - 642 -64 24127 6833 127M27 04/24/90 467.50 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANER 10- 4620 - 560 -56 24030 6928 127M27 04/24/90 21.70 * MERIT SUPPLY •CLEANING SUPPLIES 23- 4512 - 612 -61 24010 6862 127'127 05/01/90 445.00 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 28- 4512 - 702 -7.0 24114 7216 127M27 04/24/90 480.90 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 30- 4512 - 782 -78 24031 6891 127M27 04/30/90 401.70 MERIT SUPPLY HTH CHLORINE 40- 4504 - 801 -80 24055 6947 127M27 04/24/90 993.00 MERIT SUPPLY TABLES 60- 1300 - 005 -20 23943 6616 8,507.45 * ** *-CKS 127M29 04/24/90 44.42 MESSERLI & KRAMER AMBULANCE COLLECT 10- 3180 - 000 -00 44.42 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 127M32 05/01/90 113.74 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632 - 862 -86 127M32 04/26/90 369.81 969.se M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632 - 862 -86 127M32 04/24/90 285.28 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4634 - 862 -86 10- 4524- 301 -30 3355 127M42 04/24/90 136.56 MIDWEST ASPHALT 768.83* BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 301 -30 3302 1103 * * * * ** 04/26/90 440.26 MIDWEST * ** -CKS 127M35 04/24/90 218,619.58 METRO WASTE CONTROL SEWER SERVICE 40- 4312 - 812 -80 505005 115.58 218,619.58 * ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP * * * * ** * ** -CKS 127M42 04/26/90 280.61 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524- 301 -30 3326 127M42 04/26/90 238.17 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524- 301 -30 3355 127M42 04/24/90 136.56 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 301 -30 3302 1103 127M42 04/26/90 440.26 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 314 -30 3355 127M42 04/26/90 115.58 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 40- 4524 - 803 -80 3326 127M42 04/26/90 237.41 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 40- 4524 - 803 -80 3355 1,448.59 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 1990 CITY_ OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 127M46 05/01/90 127M46 04/24/90 127M46 05/01/90 k k * k k 127M51 04/24/90 k k k k k k * 127M68 04/26/90 127M68 04/24/90 127M68 04/26/90 127M68 04/26/90 127M68 04/26/90 127M68 04/26/90 127M68 04/26/90 127M68 04/26/90 127M68 04/26/90 127M68 04/26/90 * k * * k k 127M70 05/01/90 127M70 05/01/90 127M70 05/01/90 127M70 04/24/90 k k k k k k 127M73 04/24/90 * * k k * k 127M76 04/24/90 127M76 04/24/90 * k * k * k 127M80 04/24/90 127M80 04/24/90 127M80 04/24/90 127M81 04/24/90 127M81 04/24/90 127M81 04/24/90 127M81 04/24/90 55.72 10- 4504 - 301-30 MN. CHECK REGISTER 185.79 AMOUNT MN. GLOVE VENDOR * ITEM DESCRIPTION 174.04 67.15 METZ BAKING CO BREAD 143.48 MN METZ BAKING CO BREAD 5.50 110.20 METZ BAKING CO COST /GOODS SOLD 323.02 MN. TORO INC. 203.31 27- 1340 - 000 -00 MN. 1,060.00 102.04 MIDWEST WIRE & STEEL METAL STAKES 1,060.00 MN. TORO INC. 87.68 MN. CELLULAR TEL. CAR PHONES 215.27 MN. CELLULAR TEL. CAR PHONE 104.05 MN. CELLULAR TEL. EQUIP RENTAL 37.35 MN. CELLULAR TEL. EQUIP RENTAL 30.90 MN. CELLULAR TEL. EQUIP RENTAL 21.08 MN. CELLULAR TEL. EQUIP RENTAL 14.25 MN. CELLULAR TEL. EQUIP RENTAL 11.74 MN. CELLULAR TEL. EQUIP RENTAL 137.50 MN. CELLULAR TEL. EQUIP RENTAL 37.21 MN. CELLULAR TEL. EQUIP RENTAL 697.03 50.50 MN. CONWAY MAINT 46.00 MN. CONWAY -SAFETY EQUIP 249.00 MN. CONWAY FIRE GEAR /JACKET 83.81 MN. CONWAY SERVICE 429.31 89.30 MN. ELEVATOR SERVICE CONTRACT 89.30 55.72 10- 4504 - 301-30 MN. GLOVE 185.79 40- 4504 - 801 -80 MN. GLOVE 241.51 * 87289 67.15 10- 4210 - 140 -14 MN SUBURBAN NEWS 20.65 10- 4210 - 140 -14 MN SUBURBAN NEWS 22.40 10- 4540 - 560 -56 MN SUBURBAN NEWS 110.20 * 104994 6870 81.89 10- 4540 - 560 -56 MN. TORO INC. 203.31 27- 1340 - 000 -00 MN. TORO INC. 102.04 MN. TORO INC. 8,067.00 MN. TORO INC. i 05 -07 -90 PAGE 23 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 27- 4624 - 663 -66 5511 27- 4624 - 663 -66 28- 4624 - 703 -70 10- 4504 - 318 -30 29024 6017 10- 4204 - 100 -10 10- 4204 - 140 -14 10- 4226 - 420 -42 10- 4226 - 420 -42 10- 4226 - 420 -42 10- 4226 - 420 -42 10- 4226 - 420 -42 10- 4226- 420 -42 10- 4226 - 420 -42 10- 4226 - 420 -42 10- 4274 - 440 -44 145946 10- 4642 - 420 -42 145947 1074901 - 440 -44 15165 7219 27- 4288 - 662 -66 145907 7183 30- 4288 - 782 -78 30415 7124 GLOVES 10- 4504 - 301-30 42208 7010 GLOVES /SAFETY 40- 4504 - 801 -80 41277 6927 AD FOR BIDS 10- 4210 - 140 -14 87289 ADS FOR BIDS 10- 4210 - 140 -14 87290 OFFICIAL PUBLICATION 10- 4210 - 140 -14 87291 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 106274 6872 PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 104994 6870 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 105207 6872 NEW MOWERS 27- 1340 - 000 -00 105477 6685 * ** -CKS kkk -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1990 '-!,-Y OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 127M81 04/30/90 47.52 MN. TORO INC. IRRIGATION PARTS 127M81 04/30/90 320.00 MN. TORO INC. IRRIGATION PARTS 127M81 04/24/90 61.20 MN. TORO INC. IRRIGATION PARTS 8,882.96 127M90 05/01/90 136.38 MODEL STONE CO. CONCRETE 136.38 127M91 04/24/90 211.04 MODERN EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 211.04 127M92 05/01/90 4.20 MONARCH MARKETING MARKING MACHINE 4.20 127M93 05/01/90 52.00 MOTOROLA TELETYPE SERV 52.00 127M97 05/01/90 1,183.16 MPLS FINANCE DEPT. SIGNAL COSTS 127M97 05/01/90 539.80 MPLS FINANCE DEPT. SIGNAL COSTS 127M97 04/24/90 4,542.08 MPLS FINANCE DEPT. WATER PURCHASED 6,265.04 127NO3 04/24/90 360.00 MPLS SEWER & WATER STOP BOX REPAIR 360.00 * * * * * ** 127NO7 04/26/90 10.00 MTS NW SOUND GENERAL SUPPLIES 10.00 * * * * * ** 127NO9 04/24/90 53.50 MUNICILITE CO. REPAIR WORK 127NO9 04/24/90 76.98 MUNICILITE CO. SPOT LIGHT 130.48 127N13 04/24/90 43.45 MUZAK ADVERTISING 127N13 04/24/90 43.45 MUZAK ADVERTISING 86.90 127N14 04/24/90 33.33 NARCOFFICER ADVERTISING 127N14 04/24/90 33.33 NARCOFFICER ADVERTISING 127N14 04/24/90 33.34 NARCOFFICER ADVERTISING 100.00 * * * * ** 127N16 04/26/90 1,557.00 NSP AC TRANSFORMER 05 -07 -90 PAGE 24 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 27- 4540 - 664 -66 107937 7117 27- 4540- 664 -66 107984 7192 27- 4540 - 664 -66 104587 6835 * ** -CKS 40- 4504 - 803 -80 83243 7098 10- 4540 - 560 -56 7018 50- 4516 - 860 -86 417488 10- 4268 - 420 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4252 - 330 =30 047017 10- 4252 - 330 -30 047017 40- 4640 - 803 -80 * ** -CKS 40- 4248 - 803 -80 21027 7099 * ** -CKS 30- 4504 - 782 -78 82425 1324 * ** -CKS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 2093 6631 10- 4620 - 560 -56 2120 7023 50- 4214 - 822 -82 10905M 50- 4214 - 862 -86 103005 50- 4214 - 822 -82 50- 4214 - 842 -84 50- 4214 - 862 -86 23- 1300 - 001 -00 71452 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -07 -90 PAGE 25 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 1,557.00 *xxx *k * ** -CKS 127N21 04/24/90 25.40 NAPA AUTO PARTS GAUGE 10- 4504 - 325 -30 414851 7020 127N2i 04/24/90 75.69 NAPA AUTO PARTS PUMP ASSY 10- 4540 - 560 -56 414792 7148 127N21 04/30/90 26.61 NAPA AUTO PARTS FILTER 10 =4540- 560 -56 388722 7181 127N21 04/24/90 103.10 NAPA AUTO PARTS FITTINGS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 413072 6913 127N21 04/24/90 99.53 NAPA AUTO PARTS HOSE 10- 4540- 560 -56 402325 6257 1271g21 04/24/90 65.98- NAPA AUTO PARTS CREDIT 10- 4540 - 560 -56 407377 '.27N21 04/24/90 325.30- NAPA AUTO PARTS CREDIT 10- 4540 - 560 -56 384860 127N21 04/24/90 63.89 NAPA AUTO PARTS TRANS PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 414526 6995 127N21 04/24/90 33.43 NAPA AUTO PARTS TRANS PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 414544 6995 i27N21 04/24/90 33.72 NAPA AUTO PARTS PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 408712 6715 127N21 04/24/90 121.80 i2i.88 - NAPA AUTO PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 583838 4470 127N21 04/24/90 29.36 NAPA AUTO PARTS AIR FILTER 10- 4540 - 560 -56 413094 6916 127N21 04/24/90 76.17 NAPA AUTO PARTS TRAN KIT 10- 4540 - 560 -56 386389 7075 127N21 04/24/90 9.50 NAPA AUTO PARTS BRACKETS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 410017 6799 127N21 04/24/90 251.39 NAPA AUTO PARTS AIR FILTER 10- 4620- 560 -56 413393 6926 127N21 04/30/90 329.70 NAPA AUTO PARTS TORCH 10- 4620- 560 -56 388744 7341 127N21 04/24/90 8.29 NAPA AUTO PARTS GLASS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 414863 7022 896.30* - 886 .88- x 127N22 04/30/90 280.00 NATL GUARDIAN SYS. AC ALARM SYST 10- 4248 - 646 -64 219935 7419 127N22 05/01/90 161.14 NATL GUARDIAN SYS. ALARM 27- 4304 - 662 -66. 127N22 05/01/90 473.99 NATL GUARDIAN SYS. ALARM 27- 4304 - 662 -66 127N22 05/01/90 233.63 NATL GUARDIAN SYS. ALARM SERVICE 50- 4304 - 841 -84 220672 1,148.76 xxk -CKS 127N33 04/24/90 129.00 NELSON RADIO.COMM SIREN REPAIR .10- 4620 - 560 -56 15727 6988 129.00 *k * *x* * ** -CKS. 127N48 04/30/90 363.06 NO STAR TURF SHOVELS /RACKS 27- 4504 - 664 -66 204250 6490 127N48 04/24/90 64.87 NO STAR TURF PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 213350 6899 427.93 * M * ** -CKS 127N82 04/24/90 70.54 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 171043 6756 127N82 04/24/90 57.12 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 171440 7056 127N82 04/24/90 31.30 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 171244 6906 127N82 04/24/90 93.92 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 171232 6906 127N82 05/01/90 224.85 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 171547 7058 477.73 *xk * ** * ** -CKS 127N94 04/24/90 18.33 MN. AMVETS NEWS ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 822 -82 127N94 04/24/90 18.33 MN. AMVETS NEWS ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 842 -84 127N94 04/24/90 18.34 MN. AMVETS NEWS ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 862 -86 55.00 1990 CITY OF EDINA 24.63 PBE CHECK REGISTER 6914 05 -07 -90 PAGE 26 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT PBE VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 54.50 PBE AIR VALVE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 432317 4270 127P24 04/30/90 80.18 * ** -CKS 127017 04/30/90 22.00 7017 OFFICE PRODUCTS CABLE 10- 4504- 510 -51 106996 BEACON LIGHT 127017 04/30/90 108.00 04/24/90 OFFICE PRODUCTS MOUSE PORT PS /2 10- 4901 - 510 -51 107793 6680 127017 04/30/90 3,377.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPUTER 10- 4901 - 600 -60 108241 6299 127017 04/30/90 383.00 CASH OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPUTER 10- 4902 - 434 -43 108241 6299 127017 04/30/90 171.00 10- 4208 - 480 -48 OFFICE PRODUCTS SERIAL PORT PS /2 10- 4902 - 510 -51 108533 6680 MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 490 -49 4,061.00 05/01/90 3.97 PETTY CASH PLANNING EXP '10- 4212- 510 -51 * * * * ** 127036 04/26/90 65.98 OLSON CHAIN & CABLE REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 98083 7129 127036 04/30/90 94.74 OLSON CHAIN & CABLE REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540- 664 -66 98084 7213 160.72 * * * * * ** 127P24 04/24/90 24.63 PBE PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 6914 127P24 04/24/90 170.00- PBE CREDIT 10- 4540 - 560 -56 9555 127P24 04/24/90 54.50 PBE AIR VALVE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 432317 4270 127P24 04/30/90 80.18 PBE MIRROR 10- 4540 - 560 -56 7017 127P,24 04/24/90 63.75 PBE BEACON LIGHT 10- 4620 - 560 -56 4995 127P24 04/24/90 31.54 PBE LENS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 6546 127P24 04/24/90 19.45 PBE LENS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 6546 127P36 05/01/90 104.05 PETTY CASH MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 160 -16 * * * * ** 127P30 05/01/90 235.20 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING PEPSI 27- 4504 - 664 -66 10- 4208 - 480 -48 127P36 05/01/90 235.20 PETTY CASH MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 490 -49 * * * k k k 127P36 05/01/90 11.48 PETTY CASH MTG EXPENSES 10- 4202 - 260 -26 127P36 05/01/£0 12.69 PETTY CASH MTG EXPENSES 10- 4202 - 600 -60 127P36 05 /01 /�-0 1.25 PETTY CASH BUS FARE 10- 4204- 200 -20 127P36 05/01/90 56.22 PETTY CASH STAFF MEETING 10- 4206 - 140 -14 127P36 05/01/90 46.27 PETTY CASH MEETING EXPENSES 10- 4206 - 200 -20 127P36 05/01/90 12•.85 PETTY CASH MEETING EXPENSES 10- 4206 - 260 -26 127P36 05/01/90 2.80 PETTY CASH MEETING EXPENSES 10- 4206 - 500 -50 127P36 05/01/90 19.89 PETTY CASH MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 160 -16 127P36 05/01/90 21.10 PETTY CASH MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 480 -48 127P36 05/01/90 18.64 PETTY CASH MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 490 -49 127P36 05/01/90 3.97 PETTY CASH PLANNING EXP '10- 4212- 510 -51 127P36 05/01/90 35.71 PETTY CASH PHONE BILLS 10- 4256 - 140 -14 127P36 05/01/90 1.05 PETTY CASH POSTAGE 10- 4290 - 140 -14 127P36 05/01/90 2.90 PETTY CASH POSTAGE 10- 4290 - 800 -80 127P36 05/01/90 11.45 PETTY CASH GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 140 -14 127P36 05/01/90 16.59 PETTY CASH GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 200 -20 127P36 05/01/90 17.50 PETTY CASH GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 260 -26 127P36 05/01/90 24.90 PETTY CASH GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 520 -52 127P36 05/01/90 23.02 PETTY CASH GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 600 -60 127P36 05/01/90 7.00' PETTY CASH PARKING 10- 4506 - 140 -14 127P36 05/01/90 6.50 PETTY CASH MEETING 10- 4506 - 200 -20 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 127P36 05/01/90 127P36 05/01/90 127P36 05/01/90 127P36 05/01/90 127P44 04/24/90 * * * * ** SUPPLIES 127P48 04/24/90 * * * * ** EXPENSES 127P52 04/24/90 127P58 05/01/90 * * * * ** 127P64 04/24/90 127P64 05/01/90 * * * * ** 127P66 05/01/90 * * * * ** MAINT CONTRACT 127P70 04/26/90 * * * * ** 127P74 04/24/90 * * * * ** 127P84 05/01/90 * * * * ** .127P93 04/24/90 05 -07 -90 PAGE 27 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4514 - 520 -52 10- 4596 - 627 -62 12- 4206 - 434 -43 28- 4504 - 702 -70 * ** -CKS 10- 4274 - 440 -44 D20837 5053 * ** -CKS 30- 4600- 781 -78 6989 7245 * ** -CKS 10- 4290 - 510 -51 744502 * ** -CKS 28- 4504 - 702 -70 101464 * ** -CKS 10- 4500 - 500 -50 021826 7205 28- 4504 - 702 -70 021874 7053 * ** -CKS 10- 4266 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4290 - 510 -51 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 = 140 -14 026105 * ** -CKS 28- 4600 - 701 -70 33055 6886 * ** -CKS 30- 4202 - 781 -78 7137 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 1.42 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 6.50 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 70.58 PETTY CASH EXPENSES 3.93 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 436.21 345.00 PHYSIO CONTROL MAINT CONTRACT 345.00 * 36.20 PIP PRINTING PRINTING 36.20 * 376.00.. PITNEY BOWES EQUIP MAINT 376.00 27.20 PLUNKETTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 27.20 120.00 POMMER CO VOLUNTEER RECPTN 71.65 POMMER CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 191.65 110.00 PONY EXP RELOADERS• UNIFORMS 110.00 3,000.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 3,000.00 * 50.00 PRECISION BUS SYSTEM HEADSETS 50.00 * 255.00 PRO INSTANT PRINT PRINTING /SHOW 255.00 * 59.00 PRYOR RESOURCES INC CONFERENCE 05 -07 -90 PAGE 27 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4514 - 520 -52 10- 4596 - 627 -62 12- 4206 - 434 -43 28- 4504 - 702 -70 * ** -CKS 10- 4274 - 440 -44 D20837 5053 * ** -CKS 30- 4600- 781 -78 6989 7245 * ** -CKS 10- 4290 - 510 -51 744502 * ** -CKS 28- 4504 - 702 -70 101464 * ** -CKS 10- 4500 - 500 -50 021826 7205 28- 4504 - 702 -70 021874 7053 * ** -CKS 10- 4266 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4290 - 510 -51 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 = 140 -14 026105 * ** -CKS 28- 4600 - 701 -70 33055 6886 * ** -CKS 30- 4202 - 781 -78 7137 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -07 -90 PAGE 28 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 59.00 * **w*ww ***_CKS 127Q20 04/30/90 21.27 QUICK SERV BATTERY FILTERS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 35436 6552 21.27 * ****** *** -CKS 127Q22 05/01/90 22.60 QUIK PRINT PRINTING 28- 4600 - 701 -70 037677 7138 22.60 * w**w** * **-CKS 127R01 05/01/90 40.65 R & R SPECIALTIES REPAIR PARTS 28- 4248 - 704 -70 13123 6900 127R01 05/01/90 358.15 R & R SPECIALTIES REPAIR PARTS 28- 4248 - 704 -70 13122 7374 127R01 05/01/90 99.65 R & R SPECIALTIES REPAIR PARTS 28- 4248 - 704 -70 13027 6820 498.45 .*** -CKS 127R12 04/24/90 75.90 RADIO SHACK SMOKE DETECTOR 10- 4540 - 520 -52 913966 6979 127R12 04/24/30 7.34 RADIO SHACK PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 17681 7072 127R12 04/24/90 13.83 RADIO SHACK SCREWDRIVER 10- 4540 - 540 -54 17456 6996 127R12 04/30/90 8.07 -8.9@. - RADIO SHACK SWITCHES 10- 4540 - 560 -56 15432 7168 127R12 04/24/90 5.68 RADIO SHACK REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 17344 6944 110.82* $" w *w*x** *** -CKS 127R21 04/24/90 662.65 RED WING SHOES SHOES 10- 4642 - 301 -30 205011 127R21 04/24/90 295.65 RED WING SHOES SHOES 10- 4642 - 646 -64 205011 127R21 04/24/90 177.55 RED WING SHOES SHOES 40- 4642 - 801 -80 205011 1,135.85 * 127R22 04/24/90 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 1093 7242 127R22 04/24/90 .193.50 69.07 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 1086 7243 127R22 04/24/90 432.00 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 1119 7295 694.57 * ****** *** -CKS 127831 292 nD RETATI DATA SYS MN REPAIR RUMP �$_TA �40��� 210_667¢ 127R31 05/01/90 111.81 RETAIL DATA SYS MN REGISTER TAPE 50- 4516- 840 -84 1630 111.81* "594.91 -* w***ww *** -CKS 127R47 04/30/90 69.95 ROAD MACHINERY CABLE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 6940 69.95 * ww**w* ***-CKS 127R49 04/24/90 108.00- ROAD RESCUE CREDIT 10- 4620 - 560 -56 2145 3258 127R49 04/24/90 353.35 ROAD RESCUE PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 40037 7147 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -07 -90 PAGE 29 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 127R49 04/24/90 136.63 ROAD RESCUE PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 30009 5910 127R49 04/24/90,, 36.86- ROAD RESCUE FLASHER 10- 4620 - 560 -56 2214 127R49 04/24/90 15.47 ROAD RESCUE PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 30054 6348 127R49 04/24/90 34.26- ROAD RESCUE CREDIT 10- 4620 - 560 -56 2144 326.33 * xxxxxx xxx'CKS 127R65 04/24/90 31.09 ROLLINS OIL CO. PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 31111 6211 31.09 * xxxxxx * ** -CKS 127R81 04/30/90 205.14 RUBENSTEIN & ZIFF CRAFT SUPPLIES 23- 4588 - 611 -61 164018 7304 127R81 04/24/90 216.38 RUBENSTEIN & ZIFF COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 162880 6904 421.52 xxxxxx * ** -CKS 127SO3 04/30/90 10.87 S.T. ROBB GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 646 -64 52869 7155 10.87 * 127SO4 04/24/90 24.82 SATTERLEE MATERIAL 10- 4580 - 301 -30 6806 24.82 * xxxxxx _ xxx -CKS 127S10 04/24/90 81.00 SUBURBAN TIRE & AUTO RAD TUBE 10- 4610 - 560 -56 8056 7145 127SIO 04/30/90 103.32 SUBURBAN TIRE & AUTO PARTS 10- 4616 - 560 -56 8399 7258 127S10 04/24/90 516.60 SUBURBAN TIRE & AUTO TIRES 10- 4616 - 560 -56 8035 6997 127SIO 04/24/90 1,131.18 SUBURBAN TIRE & AUTO TIRES 10- 4616 - 560 -56 8038 6816 127SIO 04/30/90 258.30 SUBURBAN TIRE & AUTO PARTS 10- 4616 - 560 -56 8269 7171 127SIO 04/24/90 194.84 SUBURBAN TIRE & AUTO TIRES 10- 4616 - 560 -56 7397- 6566 2,285.24 * 127S11 04/26/90 146.00 SCHMIDT MUSIC MUSIC SUPPLIES 10- 4596 - 627 - 62620731 7383 146.00 * xxx -CKS 127S15 05/01/90 102.14 SEARS TOOLS 27- 4580 - 664 -66 6472 127S15 04/24/90 67.49 SEARS GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 6887 169.63 127S16 04/30/90 28.21 SOFTWARE ETC BOOKS 10- 4504 - 510 -51 70209 28.21 xxxxxx xxx -CKS 127S25 04/24/90 216.00 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC COST /GOODS SOLD 28- 4624 - 703 -70 4H1602 7060 216.00 xxxxxx xxx -CKS 127S27 04/24/90 122.67 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINIT SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 325 -30 25833 6782 1990 CITY OF EDINA 10.06 CHECK REGISTER PAUL BOOK 05 -07 -90 PAGE 30 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 127S45 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 127S27 04/24/90 87.00 10- 4504 - 325 -30 SHERWIN WILLIAMS THINNER 10- 4504 - 335 -30 26175 6803 27.15 10- 4248 - 560 -56 209.67 PAUL BOOK OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 540 -54 10941 r * * ** 127S45 05/01/90 127.49 STREICHERS ST. PAUL * ** -CKS 127S34 04/24/90 15.04 5628 SOUTHDALE FORD TUBE ASSY 10- 4540 - 560 -56 236912 127S34 04/24/90 15.99 MAILERS SOUTHDALE FORD TUBE OIL 10- 4540 - 560 -56 236867 43.88 200.32 31.03 CHEVROLET PIPE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 124153 127S77 * * *x* * ** -CKS 127545 04/24/90 10.06 ST. PAUL BOOK NAME TAGS 10- 4500 - 500 -50 011858 3,208.00 127S45 04/24/90 2P.25 10- 4201 - 504 -50 ST. PAUL BOOK OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 325 -30 557 6860 127545 04/30/90 27.15 10- 4248 - 560 -56 ST. PAUL BOOK OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 540 -54 10941 7081 127S45 05/01/90 127.49 STREICHERS ST. PAUL BOOK OFFICE SUPPLIES 27- 4516- 667 -66 921142 5628 127S45 04/24/90 6.37 M70026 7146 ST. PAUL BOOK MAILERS 40- 4504 - 801 -80 11860 7169 04/24/90 43.88 200.32 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET PIPE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 124153 127S77 04/24/90 20.47 * * * * ** SUBURBAN CHEVROLET VALVE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 124123 127S77 04/24/90 48.08 * ** -CKS 127S51 05/01/90 123.60 124024 ST PAUL CANDY /TOBAC CIGARS 27- 4504 - 663 -66 CHEVROLET 5516 10- 4540 - 560 -56 124376 123.60 04/24/90 2.59- SUBURBAN CHEVROLET FLYWHHEL 10- 4540 - 560 -56 124376 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 127S67 04/26/90 3,208.00 STORE FRONT HUMAN SERVICES 10- 4201 - 504 -50 112305 127S67 04/24/90 3,208.00 108.00 STORE FRONT HUMAN SERVICES 10- 4201 - 504 -50 112303 10- 4248 - 560 -56 7298 6,416.00 04/24/90 100.00 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET * * * * ** 10- 4248 - 560 -56 100576 127S77 04/24/90 2.59 * ** -CKS 127572 05/01/90 120.00 124376 STREICHERS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 M70675 7389 127572 04/24/90 64.95 10- 4540 - 560 -56 STREICHERS DASHLAZER 10- 4620 - 560 -56 M70026 7146 SUBURBAN 184.95 * 10- 4540- 560 -56 124589 127S77 04/24/90 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 127S77 04/24/90 213.93 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPLACE EXTENSION 10- 4248 - 560 -56 7211 127577 04/30/90 108.00 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR DOOR 10- 4248 - 560 -56 7298 127S77 04/24/90 100.00 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET TRANS REBULIT 10- 4248 - 560 -56 100576 127S77 04/24/90 2.59 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET FLYWHHEL 10- 4540 - 560 -56 124376 127S77 04/24/90 100.00 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR WORK 10- 4540 - 560 -56 100706 127S77 04/24/90 136.50 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CLUTCH 10- 4540- 560 -56 124589 127S77 04/24/90 43.88 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET PIPE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 124153 127S77 04/24/90 20.47 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET VALVE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 124123 127S77 04/24/90 48.08 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 124024 127S77 04/24/90 2.59 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET FLYWHEEL 10- 4540 - 560 -56 124376 127577 04/24/90 2.59- SUBURBAN CHEVROLET FLYWHHEL 10- 4540 - 560 -56 124376 127577 04/24/90 51.41 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET FLYWHEEL 10- 4540 - 560 -56 124296 127S77 04/30/90 1.60 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET GUIDE 10- 4540 -560- 56.124747 127577 04/24/90 40.94 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET VALVE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 124580 127S77 04/24/90 14,999.00 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET S -10 BLAZER 10- 4901 - 440-44 60659 6523 15,866.40 * 127S78 04/24/90 61.56 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 7002 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK•REGISTER * ** -CKS CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 10- 4600 = 507 -50 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 127S78 04/24/90 297.02 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP VALVE /TRAP 127S78 04/24/90 118.77 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP VALVE /TUBE CUTTER 127S78 04/24/90 111.26- SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP CREDIT 127S78 04/30/90 110.23 10- 4201 - 644 -64 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP VALVE /TAPE 127S78 04/30/90 244.18 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP REPAIR PARTS 127S78 04/30/90 280.73 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP TOOLS _ 1,001.23 k *kkk k 127S86 04/24/90 23.80 SUPRA COLOR LABS PHOTOGRAPHIC 127S86 04/24/90 4.00 SUPRA COLOR LABS PHOTOGRAPHIC k x x* x x 27.80 127S92 04/30/90 11.42 i SYSTEM SUPPLY RIBBONS 11.42 * kkk * k k 127S97 05/01/90 5,868.44 SEH 'PRO SERV ENG *kkk k 5,868.44 * k 127T03 04/24/90 46.99 TARGET GENERAL SUPPLIES k k k k k k 46.99 * 127T05 04/30/90 88.00 THE PRINT SHOP PROGRAMS 127T05 04/30/90 102.00 THE PRINT SHOP PRINTING 190.00 127T06 04/30/90 135.00 T & D AUTO SUPPLY CONVERTER 135.00 k k k k k k 127T08 04/24/90 97.41 TARGET CHARCOAL k 97.41 * k k k k k 127T11 04/24/90 248.31 TESSMAN SEED & CHEM. FERTILIZER k k k k k k 248.31 * 127T13 04/24/90 960.00 TOM HORWATH FORESTY 127T13 04/25/90 960.00- TOM HORWATH FORESTRY .00 127T14 04/24/90 48.09 TEXGAS CORP. PROPANE _ _ 05 07 90 PAGE 31 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4540 - 540 -54 6923 10- 4540 - 540 -54. 7170 10- 4540 - 540 -54 10- 4620 - 560 -56 7280 40- 4540 - 801 -80 7026 40- 4580 - 803 -80 6941 * ** -CKS 10- 4508 - 420 -42 290896 10- 4508 - 420 -42 290615 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 510 -51 40555 4616 * ** -CKS 40- 4201 - 800 -80 7214 * ** -CKS 23- 4504 - 612 -61 109859 * ** -CKS 10- 4500 - 500 -50 91793 7130 10- 4600 = 507 -50 91819 10- 4540 - 560 -56 79883 7156 * *.* -CKS 27- 4504 - 663 -66 * ** -CKS 30- 4558 - 783 -78 49365 6603 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 644 -64 10- 4201 - 644 -64 10- 4504 - 301 -30 1990 CITY OF EDINA PROPANE TOLL CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT COMPANY k k* k k k TOOLS 48.09 TOOL REPAIR 127T16 04/24/90 33.74 -vs.6 ELEVATOR ELEVATOR SERVICE 33.74* ��- TESTING * k * k k * PRO SERVICES UHL CO 127T40 04/24/90 102.00 MED 127T40 04/24/90 102.94 MED 127T40 04/24/90 54.20 MED SERV OXYGEN 259.14 MED 127T42 04/24/90 20.20 MED 127T42 04/24/90 294.87 315.07 kkkkk k 127T53 04/24/90 5,025.25 127T53 04/24/90 7,760.18 * k k * * k 12,785.43 127T66 04/24/90 88.73 127T66 04/24/90 31.24 kkkkk 119.97 127T82 04/24/90 61.43 kkkkk k 61.43 127T91 04/24/90 1,764.66 kkkkk 1,764.66 * 127U17 04/24/90 188.00 kkkkk 188.00 * 127U25 04/26/90 29.70 127U25 04/24/90 28.49 127U15 04/24/90 28.49 127U25 04/24/90 28.49 127U25 04/24/90 152.25 267.42 0 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION TIERNEY BROS INC MAP BOOK SUPPLIES TOLL COMPANY PROPANE TOLL COMPANY PROPANE TOLL COMPANY OXYGEN TOOLS BY OLSEN TOOL REPAIR TOOLS BY OLSEN SUPPLIES TRACY OIL GASOLINE TRACY OIL GASOLINE TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT CRAFT SUPPLIES TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT CRAFT SUPPLIES TWIN CITY ELEVATOR ELEVATOR SERVICE TWIN CITY TESTING PRO SERVICES UHL CO CALIBRATION, UNIVERSAL MED SERV FIRST AID SUPPLIES UNIVERSAL MED SERV OXYGEN UNIVERSAL MED SERV OXYGEN UNIVERSAL MED SERV UNIVERSAL MED SERV _OXYGEN FIRST AID SUPPLIES 05 -07 -90 PAGE 32 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 440 -44 49362 * ** -CKS 10- 4610- 560 -56 490841.7012 10- 4616 - 560 -56 110597 7001 27- 4580 - 664 -66 36608 7050 * ** -CKS 27- 4248 - 664 -66 25079 7129 27- 4504 - 664 -66 25078 7129 * ** -CKS 10- 4612- 560 -56 T17896 10- 4612 - 560 -56 T17897 * ** -CKS 23- 4588 - 611 -61 375381 6758 23- 4588 - 611 -61 344570 3156 * ** -CKS 10- 4248 - 520 -52 12965 * ** -CKS 40- 4201 - 801 -80 4977 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 59269 8131 * ** -CKS 10- 4510 - 420 -42 2700 10- 4510 - 440 -44 759414 5805 10- 4510 - 440 -44 759326 10- 4510 - 440 -44 759269 5805 10- 4510 - 440 -44 002701 6076 1990 CITY OF EDINA 05 -07 -90 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. * *rtwkk 127V15 04/24/90 487.43 *k *rtw* 487.45 * ** -CKS 127V30 04/30/90 415.00 305223 127V30 04/26/90 120.82 - r29.98 127V30 04/30/90 383.35 ** *-CKS 127V30 04/24/90 102.60 11126 127V30 04/24/90 800.00 1,829.95 k * w * k * rt 011110 1,821.77* 127V43 04/24/90 166..55 11127 127V43 04/24/90 339.06 LITE REPAIR 127V43 04/24/90 208.21 127V43 04/24/90 137.86 11104 * k 851.68 127V46 04/26/90 1,425.64 * ** -CKS VERSATILE VEHICLE CART PARTS 1,425.64 6341 127W08 04/30/90 164.80 CART PARTS krt * * *w 6279 164.80 127W11 05/01/90 381.60 6313 6960 381.60 CART PARTS 27- 4540 - 665 -66 6288 6950 127W13 05/01/90 6,848.77 * k rt w w * ** -CKS 6,848.77 PARTS 127W41 04/24/90 539.37 * * w rt * x 539.37 12,W44 04/2x/90 135.26 REPAIR PARTS 127-444 04/24/90 80.85 k k w k k w 216.11 CHECK REGISTER 05 -07 -90 PAGE 33 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS VAN PAPER CO. PAPER SUPPLIES 10- 4514 - 520 -52 305223 7048 ** *-CKS VANTAGE ELECTRIC ELECTRICAL 10- 4248 - 646 -64 11126 7407 VANTAGE ELECTRIC REPAIR AC SIGN 10- 4248 - 646 -64 011110 7382 VANTAGE ELECTRIC CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 646 -64 11127 VANTAGE ELECTRIC LITE REPAIR 27- 4248 - 662 -66 011112 7308 VANTAGE ELECTRIC PROF SERVICES 30- 4201 - 782 -78 11104 6883 * ** -CKS VERSATILE VEHICLE CART PARTS 27- 4540 - 665 -66 6341 7062 VERSATILE VEHICLE CART PARTS 27- 4540 - 665 -66 6279 6823 VERSATILE VEHICLE CART PARTS 27- 4540 - 665 -66 6313 6960 VERSATILE VEHICLE CART PARTS 27- 4540 - 665 -66 6288 6950 * ** -CKS VESSCO PARTS 40- 4540 - 805 -80 7776 7091 * ** -CKS W.W. GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 7292 * ** -CKS W. GORDON SMITH GASOLINE 27- 4612 - 664 -66 41675 7386 * ** -CKS WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP REPAIRS 40- 4248 - 801 -80 102170 * ** -CKS WEST PHOTO PHOTOGRAPHIC 10- 4508 - 420 -42 36622 6969 * ** -CKS WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. PARTS 10- 4580 - 560 -56 83323 7025 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. ELECTRODE 10- 4610 - 560 -56 83474 6873 * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 127W49 04/30/90 456.42 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES xx**x* 456.42 127W71 04/30/90 568.25 WINFIELD DEVEL. RENT 568.25 127W76 05/01/90 930.00 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY PENCILS 127W76 04/24/90 94.96 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY MAT TEES 1,024.96 127W81 04/30/90 49.45 WM H MCCOY PROPANE 49.45 ****** 127X05 04/24/90 510.00 XEROX CORP. XEROX SUPPLIES 127X05 04/24/90 113.49 XEROX CORP. XEROX SUPPLIES * k x * x n 623.49 *.. 127Z05 04/24/90 34.70 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 1ST AID 127Z05 04/24/90 77.20 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE FIRST AID SUPPLIES 127Z05 04/30/90 65.40 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SAFETY SUPPLIES A 177.30 127Z14 04/24/90 55.21 ZIEGLER INC BODY GP 55.21 410,715.37 419; -83 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 682.73 FUND 12 TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS 56,674.33 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER 38,604.99 38-- 685.9? FUND 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND 4,677.18 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND 71.54 FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND 11,381.12 FUND 30 TOTAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 254,676.91 FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND 5,466.57 FUND 41 TOTAL STORM SEWER UTILITY 5,095.75 3,895.44 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 32,231.00 FUND 60 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 820,277.49* °20 "GG ' '^ TOTAL 05 -07 -90 PAGE 34 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4504- 560 -56 23001 7287 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 627 -62 101842 *x* -CKS 27- 4516 - 661 -66 23560 5982 27- 4540 - 666 -66 27998 6830 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 314 -30 39855 7247 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 510 -51 10- 4504- 510 -51 27- 4504 - 662 -66 7239 27- 4504 - 664 -66 6964 30- 4642- 781 -78 7404 10- 4540 - 560 -56 6861 *** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS .f 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. .DATE 060700 03/29/90 wkkwkfi 06002 03/29/90 kwwkwk ' MANUAL O61C33 03/29/90 061C33 03/29/90 wkkkkw TELEPHONE 064827 03/29/90 k k k k k w MANUAL 064A82 03/29/90 064A82 03/29/90 064A82 03/29/90 064A82 03/29/90 064A83 03/29/90 064A84 03/29/90 064A84 03/29/90 064A84 03/29/90 kkkwww MANUAL 064M98 03/29/90 064M98. 03/29/90 064M98 03/29/90 064M98 03/29/90 064M98 03/29/90 064M98 03/29/90 064M98 03/29/90 064M98 03/29/90 064M98 03/29/90 064M98 03/29/90 064M98 03/29/90 064M98 03/29/90 064M98 03/29/90 064M98 03/29/90 064M98 03/29/90 kkkkwk AMOUNT 40.00 40.00 65.00 65.00 125,000.00 - 125,000.00 .00 35.00 35.00 . CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION MN DEPT OF HEALTH FEE LEAGUE /MN CITIES CITY /EDINA CITY /EDINA NATL HIWAY_INST REGISTRATION PAYROLL TRANSFER PAYROLL TRANSFER REGISTRATION 61.18 03 -31 -90 PAGE 1 AT &T TELEPHONE 2.90 MANUAL AT &T TELEPHONE 9.80 ' MANUAL AT &T TELEPHONE 33.25 MANUAL AT &T TELEPHONE 107.13 * 10- 4202 - 260 -26 MANUAL 79.00 * ** -CKS AT &T TELEPHONE 79.00 * 27- 4256 - 667 -66 MANUAL 21.00 MANUAL AT &T TELEPHONE 10.50 _ AT &T TELEPHONE 21.00 MANUAL AT &T TELEPHONE 52.50 MANUAL 10- 4254 - 520 -52 MANUAL 666.63 MANUAL MINNEGASCO HEAT 1,103.36 MANUAL MINNEGASCO HEAT 5,198.61 MANUAL MINNEGASCO HEAT 2,799.48 MANUAL MINNEGASCO HEAT 234.07 MANUAL MINNEGASCO HEAT 911.80 MANUAL MINNEGASCO HEAT 203.11 MANUAL MINNEGASCO HEAT 5,346.97 MINNEGASCO HEAT 4,067.06 MINNEGASCO HEAT 4,897.88 MINNEGACO HEAT 304.14 MINNEGACO HEAT. 2,792.84 MINNEGACO HEAT 86.74 MINNEGACO HEAT 239.58 MINNEGACO HEAT 229.55 MINNEGACO HEAT 29,081.82 * ** -CKS 03 -31 -90 PAGE 1 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4310 - 440 -44 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4202 - 100 -10 ' MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 1010- 000 -00 MANUAL 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4202 - 260 -26 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4256- 510 -51 MANUAL 27- 4256 - 622 -62 MANUAL 27- 4256 - 667 -66 MANUAL 30- 4256 - 782 -78 MANUAL 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL 40- 4256 - 801 -80 MANUAL 50- 4256 - 821 -82 MANUAL' 50- 4256 - 861 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4254- 440 -44 MANUAL 10- 4254 - 520 -52 MANUAL 10- 4254 - 540 -54 MANUAL 10- 4254 2646 -64 MANUAL 23- 4254 - 612 -61 MANUAL 27- 4254 - 662 -66 MANUAL 27- 4254- 664 -66 MANUAL 27- 4254 - 667 -66 MANUAL 28- 4254- 702 -70 MANUAL 30- 4254- 782 -78 MANUAL 40- 4254 - 801 -80 MANUAL 40- 4254 - 803 -80 MANUAL 50- 4254 - 821 -82 MANUAL 50- 4254 - 841 -84 MANUAL 50- 4254- 861 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 064N16 03/29/90 064N16 03/29/90 064N16 03/29/90 064N16 03/29/90 064N16 03/29/90 064N16 03/29/90 064N16 03/29/90 064N16 03/29/90 064N16 03/29/90 064N16 03/29/90 064N16 03/29/90 064N16 03/29/90 064N16 03/29/90 064N16 03/29/90 064N16 03/29/90 064N16 03/29/90 064N16 03/29/90 064N16 03/29/90 064N16 03/29/90 064N16 03/29/90 064N16 03/29/90 064N16 03/29/90 064N16 03/29/90 064N16 03/29/90 064N16 03/29/90 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 065EII 03/29/90 065EII 03/29/90 065EII 03/29/90 * * * * ** 065E26 03/29/90 * * * * ** MANUAL 065F14 03/29/90 065F14 03/29/90 * * * * ** O66P32 03/29/90 * * * * ** 068754 03/29/90 - 6 AMOUNT 25.07 85.70 24,447.93 3,143.67 2,405.87 1,047.80 47.18 1,389.39 2,143.86 4,163.68 716.61 43.38 1,224.10 166.90 900.67 6,542.85 427.40 5,962.97. 2,153.02 9,764.53 505.92 90.12 584.06 668.25 377.14 69,028.07 69.31 102.84 124.57 296.72 38.05 38.05 15,589.59 532.51 16.122.10 25,756.85 25,756.85 26.40 26.40 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION NSP POWER NSP POWER NSP POWER NSP POWER NSP POWER NSP POWER NSP POWER NSP POWER NSP POWER NSP POWER NSP POWER NSP POWER NSP POWER NSP POWER NSP POWER NSP POWER NSP POWER NSP POWER NSP POWER NSP POWER NSP POWER NSP POWER NSP POWER NSP POWER NSP POWER EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE ED PHILLIPS FIDELITY BANK FIDELITY BANK P.E.R.A. HENN CTY DISR COURT MIX MIX MIX BEER FICA MEDICARE PERA FINES 03 -31 -90 PAGE 2 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4252 - 301 -30 MANUAL 10- 4252 - 321 -30 MANUAL 10- 4252 - 322 -30 MANUAL 10- 4252 - 330 -30 MANUAL 10- 4252 - 375 -30 MANUAL 10- 4252 - 440 -44 MANUAL 10- 4252 - 460 -46 MANUAL 10- .4252- 520 -52 MANUAL 1074252 - 540 -54 MANUAL 10- 4252 - 646 -64 MANUAL 23- 4252 = 612 -61 MANUAL 26- 4252 - 682 -68 MANUAL 27- 4252 - 662 -66 MANUAL 27- 4252 - 664 -66 MANUAL 27- 4252 - 667 -66 MANUAL 28- 4252 - 702 -70 MANUAL 29- 4252 - 722 -72 MANUAL 30 =4252- 782 -78 MANUAL 40- 4252 - 801 -80 MANUAL' 40- 4252 - 803 -80 MANUAL 41- 4252- 902 -90 MANUAL 41- 4252 - 902 -90 MANUAL 50- 4252 - 821 -82 MANUAL 50- 4252 - 841 -84 MANUAL 50- 4252- 861 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 4632 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4632 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4632 - 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 4630 - 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10 -4149- 510 -51 MANUAL 10- 4162 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4145 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4201.- 500 -50 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE * * * * ** 068760 03/29/90 * * * * ** 068A83 03/29/90 068A83 03/29/90 * * * * ** AMOUNT 068N16 03/29/90 068N16 03/29/90 068N16 03/29/90 SCHOOL 110.00 068P70 03/29/90 * * * * ** MANUAL 068U27 03/29/90 068U27 03/29/90 068U27 03/29/90 068U27 03/29/90 068U27 03/29/90 068U27 03/29/90 068U27 03/29/90 068U27 03/29/90 068U27 03/29/90 068U27 03/29/90 068U27 03/29/90 068U27 03/29/90 068U27 03/29/90 068U27 03/29/90 068U27 03/29/90 213.65 MANUAL 071769 03/29/90 AYR *i4*1Y 480.00 071B73 03/29/90 071673 03/29/90 071673 03/29/90 071873 03/29/90 071873 03/29/90 03 -31 -90 PAGE 3 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE ***-CKS 10- 4248- 520 -52 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL 23- 4256 - 612 -61 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4252- 646 -64 MANUAL 40- 4252 - 801 -80 CHECK REGISTER 40- 4252 - 803 -80 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 110.00 DAKOTA CTY.TECH COLL SCHOOL 110.00 10- 4256 - 622 -62 MANUAL 10- 4256 - 628 -62 MANUAL 17.29 MANUAL AT &T MANUAL TELEPHONE 57.49 27- 4256- 664 -66 AT &T 28- 4256- 702 -70 TELEPHONE 74.78 MANUAL 30- 4256 - 782 -78 MANUAL 40- 4256 - 801 -80 107.17 40- 4256 - 803 -80 NSP 50- 4256- 821 -82 POWER 69.65 MANUAL NSP MANUAL POWEWR 36.83 10- 4202 - 160 -16 NSP POWER 213.65 MANUAL 27- 4202 - 661 -66 MANUAL 27- 4516- 661 -66 480.00 27- 4516 - 667 -66 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 480.00 3,132.54 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 426.59 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 124.12 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 209.21 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 24.89 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 466.03 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 58.67 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 139.18 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 37.32 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 50.77 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 85.59 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 80.15 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 148.98 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 176.23 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 146.36 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 5,306.63 * 190.00 COLLEGE /ST THOMAS SEMINAR 190.00 * 50.00 GC PETTY CASH RENTAL PROPERTY 50.00 GC PETTY CASH SCHOOL 82.00 GC PETTY CASH OFFICE SUPPLIES 294.45 GC PETTY CASH. OFFICE SUPPLIES 26.00 GC PETTY CASH PRINTING 03 -31 -90 PAGE 3 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE ***-CKS 10- 4248- 520 -52 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL 23- 4256 - 612 -61 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4252- 646 -64 MANUAL 40- 4252 - 801 -80 MANUAL 40- 4252 - 803 -80 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4290 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL 10- 4256 - 622 -62 MANUAL 10- 4256 - 628 -62 MANUAL 23- 4256 - 612 -61 MANUAL 26- 4256 - 682 -68 MANUAL 27- 4256 - 662 -66 MANUAL 27- 4256- 664 -66 MANUAL 28- 4256- 702 -70 MANUAL 29- 4256- 722 -72 MANUAL 30- 4256 - 782 -78 MANUAL 40- 4256 - 801 -80 MANUAL 40- 4256 - 803 -80 MANUAL 50- 4256- 821 -82 MANUAL 50- 4256 - 841 -84 MANUAL 50- 4256 - 861 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4202 - 160 -16 MANUAL * ** -CKS 27- 3230 - 662 -66 MANUAL 27- 4202 - 661 -66 MANUAL 27- 4516- 661 -66 MANUAL 27- 4516 - 667 -66 MANUAL 27- 4600 = 661 -66 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 071B73 03/29/90 19.71 MANUAL ED PHILLIPS 522.16 * 31.17- * ** -CKS ED PHILLIPS 071C47 03/29/90 835.40 MANUAL ED PHILLIPS 835.40 * * * * * ** MANUAL ED PHILLIPS 073H83 03/29/90 70,000.00 MANUAL ED PHILLIPS 70,000.00 * IY 1111 lk *11 MANUAL ED PHILLIPS 074666 04/10/90 1.18 - 074B66 04/10/90 77.42 04/10/90 074B66 04/10/90 78.60 PHILLIPS 074666 04/10/90 77.42- MANUAL ED PHILLIPS 77.42 04/10/90 2,876.66 MANUAL ED PHILLIPS 074E11 04/10/90 1.18 - 074E11 04/10/90 15.95 - 074E11 04/10/90 4.36 - 074E11 04/10/90 5.10 - 074E11 04/10/90 6.17 - 074E11 04/10/90 8.46 - 074E11 04/10/90 10.92 - 074E11 04/10/90 217.99 074E11 04/10/90 58.90 074EII 04/10/90 797.48 074E11 04/10/90 254.95 074EII 04/10/90 308.50 074E11 04/10/90 547.08 - 446 --9.8- 074E11 04/10/90 422.99 074E11 03/29/90 81.09 2;636.84 2,695.84 --* * * * * ** CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION GC PETTY CASH CONCESSIONS COMM LIFE INS LIFE INSURANCE HRA TRANSFER BRW ENTERPRISE BRW ENTERPRISE BRW ENTERPRISE BRW ENTERPRISE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE MIX 074E26 04/10/90 15.11- MANUAL ED PHILLIPS 074E26 04/10/90 31.17- * ** -CKS ED PHILLIPS 074E26 04/10/90 4.36- MANUAL ED PHILLIPS 074E26 04/10/90 2.73- MANUAL ED PHILLIPS 074E26 04/10/90 57.53- MANUAL ED PHILLIPS 074E26 04/10/90 755.51 MANUAL ED PHILLIPS 074E26 04/10/90 1,558.86 MANUAL ED PHILLIPS 074E26 04/10/90 136.64 MANUAL ED PHILLIPS 074E26 04/10/90 218.48 MANUAL ED PHILLIPS 074E26 04/10/90 2,876.66 MANUAL ED PHILLIPS 074E26 04/10/90 393.25 MANUAL ED PHILLIPS 074E26 04/10/90 503.00 ED PHILLIPS 074E26 04/10/90 68.40 ED PHILLIPS 03 -31 -90 PAGE 4 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 27- 4624 - 663 -66 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4157- 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 1145- 000 -00 MANUAL x**-CKS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4632- 842 -84 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 7822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -31 -90 PAGE 5 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 074E26 04/10/90 436.95 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 074E26 04/10/90 844.06 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074E26 04/10/90 204.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074E26 04/10/90 856.08 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074E26 04/10/90 983.23 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074E26 04/10/90 304.05 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 074E26 04/10/90 757.67 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 10,785.94 074G82 04/10/90 8.00- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 * ** -CKS 074G82 04/10/90' 11.48- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700- 842 -84 MANUAL 074G82 04/10/90 16.99- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074G82 04/10/90 15.36- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 074G82 04/10/90 23.04- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 074G82 04/10/90 12.54- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074G82 04/10/90 93.34- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 074G82 04/10/90 159.90- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 074G82 04/10/90 1,152.10 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 074G82 04/10/90 627.22 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074G82 04/10/90 4,666.92 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 074G82 04/10/90 7,994.95 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 074G82 04/10/90 229.95- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074G82 04/10/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074G82 04/10/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074G82 04/10/90 93.00- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628-862 -86 MANUAL 074G82 04/10/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 9-* 13,777.59* * * * ** * ** -CKS 074J62 04/10/90 30.96- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 7.92- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 37.40- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822-82 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 2.52 -- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 8.88- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 2.38- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 11.08- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 10.35- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 98.62- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 7.95- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 10.17- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 .35- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 3.32- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 87.80- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 .87- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 172.56 -;-8- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 3.75- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 8.12- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 8.23- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 7.70- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 12.28- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 8.23- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 8.23 JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 1,869.25 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626'- 822 -82 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -31 -90 PAGE 6 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 074J62. 04/10/90 9.81 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 1,548.10 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 8.33 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 4,390.49 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 28.18 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842-84 , MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 4,931.14 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 32.34 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 613.76 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 2.94 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 8,643.95 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 146.44- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 48.51 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 890.25 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 5.39 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 6.86 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 791.70 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 236.75• JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 20.33- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 252.03 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 19.30- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 5.88 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 12.25 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 14.92- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 1,019.40 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 8.82 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 10.78 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 1,106.42 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 14.21 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 2.45 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 34.60 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074J62, 04/10/90 24.01 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 333.10 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 22.54 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 23.45- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 1,034.95 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 796.14 'JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 86.50 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 18.62 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 20.09 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 21.60 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 809.08- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 769.98 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 376.42 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 812.55 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 822.35 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90. 5.39 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 8.33 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 21.60- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 074J62 04/10/90 809.08 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL * * * * ** 30,897.91* * * * -CKS 074P20 04/10/90 2.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 074P20 04/10/90 63.65 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -31 -90 PAGE 7 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 65.65 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 074P82 04110190 4.31- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 074P82 04/10/90 .79- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 074P82 04/10/90 7.47- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074P82 04/10/90 .79- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074P82 04/10/90 2.50- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 074P82 03/29/90 19.95 PRIOR WINE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 074P82 04/10/90 195.50 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 074P82 04/10/90 39.29 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 074P82 04/10/90 .373.45 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074P82 04/10/90 39.29 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074P82 04/10/90 125.22 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 776.84 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 074Q16' 04/10/90 17.62- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 074Q16 04/10/90 12.76- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 074Q16 04/10/90 .54- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 074Q16 04/10/90 1.23- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 074Q16 04/10/90 4.92- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 074Q16 04/10/90 23.66- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 074Q16 04/10/90 26.38- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 074Q16 04/10/90 1.87- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074Q16 04/10/90 11.00- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074Q16 04/10/90 .82- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074Q16 04/10/90 .36- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074Q16 04/10/90 20.18- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074Q16 04/10/90 54.50- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074Q16 04/10/90 .98- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074Q16 04/10/90 4.88- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074Q16 04/10/90 5.87- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 074Q16 04/10/90 .69- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 074Q16 04/10/90 1.21- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 074Q16 04/10/90 148.70- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 074Q16 04/10/90 18.31- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 074Q16 04/10/90 1.31- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 074Q16 04/10/90 1.23- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 074Q16 04/10/90 9.06- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 074Q16 04/10/90 1,182.21 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL. 074Q16 04/10/90 881.53 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 074Q16 04/10/90 93.36 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074Q16 04/10/90 2,724.86 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074Q16 04/10/90 1,319.35 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074Q16 04/10/90 243.86 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 074Q16 04/10/90 914.80 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 074Q16 04/10/90 7,433.99 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 074Q16 04/10/90 123.00 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 074Q16 04/10/90 54.15 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 074Q16 04/10/90 1,272.60 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 074Q16 04/10/90 489.40 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 074Q16 04/10/90 35.50 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA 161.71 # P.O. # MESSAGE CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT TAX VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 074Q16 04/10/90 1,097.75 COMM QUALITY WINE 074Q16 04/10/90 97.90 07BC51 QUALITY WINE 074Q16 04/10/90 81.90 OF QUALITY WINE 074Q16 04/10/90 2,010.50 03/29/90 QUALITY WINE 074Q16 04/10/90 121.00 REV QUALITY WINE 074Q16 04/10/90 585.45 98.29 QUALITY WINE 074Q16 04/10/90 130.50 SALES QUALITY WINE 074Q16 04/10/90 68.40 10- 3357 - 000 -00 QUALITY WINE 074Q16 04/10/90 905.55 TAX QUALITY WINE 074Q16 04/10/90 123.00 COMM QUALITY WINE REV SALES 21,622.48 078C51 03/29/90 R R R R R R 50- 3357 - 003 -00 COMM OF REV 074T22 04/10/90 423.30 03/29/90 THE WINE COMPANY 074T22 04/10/90 6.00 REV THE WINE COMPANY TAX 078C51 429.30 9,783.27 R * k * R R 074T49 04/10/90 198.90 TOW DISTRIBUTING 074T49 04/10/90 2.25 TOW DISTRIBUTING 201.15 * R R R k R 075C33 03/29/90 118,000.00 CITY /EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 075C33 03/29/90 118,000.00- CITY /EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER .00 * R R R R R R 078719 03/29/90 40.00 MICHAEL MONGE SPEAKER FEES 40.00 * k k k R R R 078C51 03/29/90 161.71 # P.O. # MESSAGE COMM OF REV SALES TAX 078C51 03/29/90 130.73 50- 4628 - 862 -86 COMM OF REV SALES TAX 07BC51 03/29/90 5,149.91 MANUAL COMM OF REV SALES TAX 078C51 03/29/90 642.70 COMM OF REV SALES TAX 078C51 03/29/90 98.29 MANUAL COMM OF REV SALES TAX 078C51 03/29/90 571.32 10- 3357 - 000 -00 COMM OF REV SALES TAX 078C51 03/29/90 704.48 MANUAL COMM OF REV SALES TAX 078C51 03/29/90 5,542.26 50- 3357 - 003 -00 COMM OF REV SALES TAX 078C51 03/29/90 10,518.67 COMM OF REV SALES TAX 078C51 03/29/90 9,783.27 COMM OF REV SALES TAX 33,303.34 * RRRRRR 078P70 03/29/90 180.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 180.00 * k R k k k R * ** -CKS 10- 4290 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 03 -31 -90 PAGE 8 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86' MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 4628 - 842-84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4206 - 430 -42 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 23- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 27- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 28- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 29- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 30- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 40- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 50- 3357 - 001 -00 MANUAL 50- 3357 - 002 -00 MANUAL 50- 3357 - 003 -00 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4290 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -31 -90 PAGE 9 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 079729 03/29/90 50.00 FOOD MKTG INSTITUE FMI CONVENTION 50- 4202 - 820 -82 MANUAL 079729 03/29/90 75.00 FOOD MKTG INSTITUE FMI CONVENTION 50- 4202 - 840 -84 MANUAL 079729 03/29/90 75.00 FOOD MKTG INSTITUE FMI CONVENTION 50- 4202 - 860 -86 MANUAL 200.00 * 1 079730 03/29/90 15.00 STATE TREAS /MN EXAM FEE 40- 4202 - 809 -80 MANUAL 15.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 079E11 04/10/90 1.11- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 079E11 04/10/90 .97- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 079E11 04110190 5.04- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 079EII 04/10/90 18.43- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 079EII 04/10/90 3.51- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 079E11 04/10/90 16.90- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 079E11 04/10/90 48.54 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 079E11 04/10/90 55.50 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 079EII 04/10/90 252.00 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 079E11 04/10/90 921.41 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 079E11 03/29/90 1.00- EGLE W CREDIT 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 079E11 04/10/90 175.50 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 079E11 04/10/90 845.12 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 079E11 03/29/90 89.50 EAGLE WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 862 -86 MANUAL 2,340.61 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 079E26 04/10/90 5.59- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 079E26 04/10/90 1.79- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 079E26 04/10/90 4.74- ED.PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 079E26 04/10/90 4.65- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 079E26 04/10/90 10.92- ED.PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 079E26 04/10/90 279.61 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 079E26 04/10/90 89.90 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 079E26 04/10/90 237.46 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 079E26 04/10/90 232.69 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 079E26 04/10/90 546.20 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 079E26 04/10/90 17.40- ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 079E26 04/10/90 778.76 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 079E26 04/10/90 227.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 079E26 04/10/90 715.35 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 079E26 04/10/90 1,137.85 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 079E26 04/10/90 98.75 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 079E26 04/10/90 509.63 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 079E26 04/10/90 973.65 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 079E26 04/10/90 986.58 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 079E26 04/10/90 258.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 079E26 04/10/90 560.45 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 079E26 04/10/90 505.95 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 079E26 03/29/90 151.50 ED PHILLIPS BEER 50- 4630 - 842 -84 MANUAL 079E26 03/29/90 182.20 ED PHILLIPS MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 MANUAL 079E26 03/29/90 43.50 ED PHILLIPS MIX 50- 4632 7862 -86 MANUAL 8,469.94 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -31 -90 PAGE 10 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * * * * ** 079F14 03/29/90 14,975.33 FIDELITY BANK FICA 10- 4149 - 510 -51 079F14 03/29/90 518.39 FIDELITY BANK MEDICARE 10- 4162 - 510 -51 15,493.72 * * * * ** 079G82 04/10/90 34.83- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 822 -82 079G82 04/10/90 10.49- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 822 -82 079G82 04/10/90 18.00- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 079G82 04/10/90 32.67- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 079G82 04/10/90 30.00- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 079G82 04/10/90 59.28- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 079G82 04/10/90 47.36- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 079G82 04/10/90 899.85 GRIGGS;COOPER 50- 4626 - 822 -82 079G82 04/10/90 1,633.32 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 822 -82 079G82 04/10/90 1,499.75 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626.- 842 -84 079G82 04/10/90 2,963.94 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 079G82 04/10/90 2,368.19 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 862 -86 079G82 04/10/90 79.00- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 822 -82 079G82 04/10/90 58.90- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 822 -82 079G82 04/10/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 822 -82 079G82 04/10/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 822 -82 079G82 04/10/90 34.59- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 862 -86 8,959.93 **k *kR 079J62 04/10/90 16.52- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3700 - 842 -84 079J62 04/10/90 2.22- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 079J62 04/10/90 1.09- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 079J62 04/10/90 31.93- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 079J62 04/10/90 1.90 JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 079J62 04/10/90 1.90- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 079J62 04/10/90 .42- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 079J62 04/10/90 6.24- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 079J62 04/10/90 6.65- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 079J62 04/10/90 5.22- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 079J62 04/10/90 48.65- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 079J62 04/10/90 33.08- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 079J62 04/10/90 3.56- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 07SJ62 04/10/90 1.69- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 079J62 04/10/90 3.45- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 079J62 04/10/90 1,596.47 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 079J62 04/10/90 10.29 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 079J62 03/29/90 .30- JOHNSON WINE CREDIT 50- 4626 - 842 -84 079J62 04/10/90 2,433.63 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 079J62 04/10/90 16.91 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 079J62 04/10/90 8.82 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 079J62 04/10/90 1,654.49 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 079J62 04/10/90 1.96- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 079J62 04/10/90 1.96 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 079J62 04/10/90 109.98- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -31 -90 PAGE 11 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 079J62 04/10/90 109.98 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 079J62 04/10/90 .98 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 079J62 04/10/90 42.03 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 079J62 04/10/90 222.27 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 079J62 04/10/90 109.98 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 079J62 04/10/90 1.96 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 079J62 04/10/90 5.39 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 079J62 04/10/90 7.35 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 079J62 04/10/90 522.32 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 079J62 04/10/90 .00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 079J62 04/10/90 12.74 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 079J62 04/10/90 625.30 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 079J62 04/10/90 15.19 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 079J62 04/10/90 618.63-4&a-6T JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 079J62 04/10/90 169.31 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 079J62 04/10/90 4.41 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 079J62 04/10/90 355.60 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 079J62 04/10/90 346.55 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 079J62 04/10/90 9.31 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 079J62 04/10/90 4.41 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 079J62 03/29/90 77.93 JOHNSON WINE BEER 50- 4630 - 842 -84 MANUAL —6,756. 25- .�� ** 8,711.55* * * *_ CKS 079P82 04/10/90 3.61- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 079P82 04/10/90 16.15- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 079P82 04/10/90 .90- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 079P82 04/10/90 7.05- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 079P82 04/10/90 180.32 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 079P82 .e?,9p82 04/10/90 e4,,te�se 807.40 952.65 PRIOR WINE PRIeR WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 079P82 04/10/90 44.95 PRIOR WINE 50 4628 862 86 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL MANUAL 079P82 04/10/90 352.64 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 079P82 03/29/90 98.44 PRIOR WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 822 -82 MANUAL - 1,866 -* *+ * ** 1,456.04* * * *_ CKS 079Q16 04/10/90 5.70- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82• MANUAL 079Q16 04/10/90 27.22- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 079Q16 04/10/90 4.07- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 079Q16 04/10/90 .49- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 079Q16 04/10/90 1.32- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL' 079Q16 04/10/90 .46- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 079Q16 04/10/90 2.46- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 079Q16 04/10/90 9.06- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 079Q16 04/10/90 .44- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 079Q16 04/10/90 67.59- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 079Q16 04/10/90 8.54- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 079Q16 04/10/90 .46 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 079Q16 04/10/90 5.70- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 079Q16 04/10/90 12.20- QUALITY -WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 079Q16 04/10/90 8.36- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 = 862 -86 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA 26,083.92 MANUAL P.E.R.A. CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 03/29/90 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 079Q16 04/10/90 WEST .49- QUALITY WINE 079Q16 04/10/90 1,361.39 2.46 QUALITY WINE 079Q16 04/10/90 3,379.01 3.78 QUALITY WINE 079Q16 04/10/90 609.61 30.81 QUALITY WINE 079Q16 04/10/90 48.95 2.85 QUALITY WINE 079Q16 04/10/90 569.50 3.32 QUALITY WINE 07,9Q16 04/10/90 406.25 43 QUALITY WINE 079Q16 04/10/90 43.50 QUALITY WINE 079Q16 04/10/90 43.50 QUALITY. WINE 079016 04/10/90 - 130.50 QUALITY WINE 079Q16 04/10/90 903.50 QUALITY WINE 079Q16 04/10/90 43.50- QUALITY WINE 079Q16 04/10/90 246.00 QUALITY WINE 079Q16 04/10/90 854.25 QUALITY WINE 079Q16 04/10/90 48.95 QUALITY WINE 079Q16 04/10/90 569.50 QUALITY WINE 079Q16 04/10/90 834.20 QUALITY WINE 9,851.47 * k * * k k k 080731 03/29/90 70.00 NATL HIWAY INST COURSE 70.00 * * * * * * * 081732 03/29/90 200.00 TRAVEL PRO CONT ED 200.00 * 081733 03/29/90 795.00 EXPL POST 911 CONT ED 795.00 * 081P32 03/29/90 26,083.92 MANUAL P.E.R.A. PERA COMM TELEPHONE 26,083.92 03/29/90 119.55 MANUAL * * * *k* WEST COMM TELEPHONE 082U27 03/29/90 082A82 03/29/90 2.46 WEST AT &T TELEPHONE 082A82 03/29/90 3.78 MANUAL AT &T TELEPHONE 082A82 03/29/90 30.81 03/29/90 AT &T TELEPHONE 082A82 03/29/90 2.85 TELEPHONE AT &T TELEPHONE 082A82 03/29/90 3.32 WEST AT &T TELEPHONE 082U27 03/29/90 43 .22 US WEST * * k * * 082U27 03/29/90 723.42 MANUAL US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 082U27 03/29/90 119.55 MANUAL US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 082U27 03/29/90 23.20 MANUAL US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 082U27 03/29/90 45.53 MANUAL US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 082U27 03/29/90 16.06 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 082U27 03/29/90 32.99 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 082U27 03/29/90 240.06 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 03 -31 -90 PAGE 12 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4202 - 260 -26 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4202 - 430 -42 MANUAL 10- 4202-430 -42 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4145 7510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL 23- 4256- 612 -61 MANUAL 27- 4256 - 662 -66 MANUAL 27- 4256- 667 -66 MANUAL 40- 4256 - 803 -80 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL 10- 4256 - 622 -62 MANUAL 10- 4256 - 628 -62 MANUAL 10- 4256 - 646 -64 MANUAL 23- 4256 - 612 -61 MANUAL 27- 4256.- 662 -66 MANUAL 27- 4256 - 667 -66 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA 55.81- GRIGGS CHECK REGISTER 085G82 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT COOPER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV 082U27 03/29/90 141.96 50- 3700 - 862 -86 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 28- 4256 - 702 -70 082U27 03/29/90 183.80 085G82 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 30- 4256 - 782 -78 082U27 03/29/90 490.31 04/10/90 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 40- 4256 - 803 -80 082U27 03/29/90 16.06 71.01- US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 50- 4256 - 821 -82 082U27 03/29/90 16.06 GRIGGS US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 50- 4256 - 841 -84 082U27 03/29/90 16.06 COOPER US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 50- 4256 - 861 -86 3,997.13 GRIGGS 2,065.06 50- 4626- 842 -84 k k k k k 085E11 04/10/90 6.79- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 085EII 04/10/90 3.86- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 085E11 04/10/90 4.51- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 085E11 04/10/90 12.18- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 085E11 04/10/90 3.86- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 085EII 04/10/90 339.33 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 085EII 04/10/90 193.00 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 085E11 04/10/90 225.72 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 085E11 04/10/90 608.99 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 085E11 04/10/90 193.00 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 1,528.84 kkk*k* 085E26 04/10/90 6.89- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 085E26 04/10/90 7.19- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 085E26 04/10/90 7.27- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 085E26 04/10/90 344.60 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 822 -82 085E26 04/10/90. 359.76 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 842 -84 085E26 04/10/90 363.86 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 085E26 04/10/90 182.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 085E26 04/10/90 40.30 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 085E26 04/10/90 342.72 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 085E26 04/10/90 17.10 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 085E26 04/10/90 128.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 085E26 04/10/90 243:74 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 085E26 04/10/90 674.65 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 085E26 04/10/90 209.15 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 085E26 04/10/90 556.90 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 085E26 04/10/90 449.32 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 085E26 03/29/90 14.50 ED PHILLIPS MIX 50- 4632 - 862 -86 3,905.25 * k k k k k 085G82 04/10/90 55.81- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700- 842 -84 085G82 04/10/90 9.99- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 842 -84 085G82 04/10/90 30.77- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 862 -86 085G82 04/10/90 19.67- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 862 -86 085G82 04/10/90 22.74- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 822 -82 085G82 04/10/90 79.94- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 085G82 04/10/90 71.01- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 085G82 04/10/90 18.00- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 085G82 04/10/90 1,136.82 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 822 -82 085G82 04/10/90 3,997.13 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 842 -84 03 -31 -90 PAGE 13 # P.O. # MESSAGE MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -31 -90 PAGE 14 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 085G82 04/10/90 3,550.34 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 085G82 04/10/90 899.85 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 085G82 04/10/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 085682 04/10/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 085682 04/10/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 085G82 04/10/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 9,276.21 085J62. 04/10/90 45.00 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628 842 84 * ** -CKS 085J62 04/10/90 6.78- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL 085J62 04/10/90 5.96- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 085J62 04/10/90 10.05- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 085J62 04/10/90 3.20- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 085J62 04/10/90 55.24- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 085J62 04/10/90 1.16- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 =84 MANUAL 085J62 04/10/90 7.47- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 085J62 04/10/90 6.07- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 085J62 04/10/90 8.81- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 085J62 04/10/90 2.94 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 085362 04/10/90 502.45 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 085J62 04/10/90 2,762.24 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 085J62 04/10/90 18.13 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 085J62 04/10/90 6.37 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 085J62 04/10/90 7.84 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 085J62 04/10/90 598.77 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 085J62 04/10/90 318.13 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 085J62 04/10/90 6.78 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 085J62 04/10/90 746.74 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 085J62 04/10/90 115.91 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 085J62 04/10/90 6.78- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 085J62 04/10/90 1.96 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 085J62 04/10/90 .00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 085J62 04/10/90 18.13 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 085J62 04/10/90 14.21 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 085J62 04/10/90 607.49 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 085762 04/10/90 881.44 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 085J62 04/10/90 10.78 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 085J62 04/10/90 3.43- 6,sia.22 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 6,550.36* * * * * ** * ** -CKS 085N12 03/29/90 2,329.96 MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE INSURANCE 10- 4158 - 510 -51 MANUAL 2,329.96 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 085P20 04/10/90 73.20 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 085P20 04/10/90 3.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 085P20 04/10/90 3.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 085P20 04/10/90 93.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 085P20 04/10/90 182.75 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 085P20 04/10/90 4.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628.- 862 -86 MANUAL 358.95 * 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -31 -90 PAGE 15 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * * * * ** 085P82 085P82 085P82 085P82 085P82 085P82 085P82 085P82 085P82 * * * * ** 085Q16 085Q16 085Q16 085Q16 085Q16 085Q16 085Q16 085Q16 085Q16 085Q16 085Q16 085Q16 085Q16 085Q16 085Q16 085Q16 085Q16 085Q16 085Q16 085Q16 085Q16 085Q16 04/10/90 2.14- 088700 PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 04/10/90 7.23- 089C33 PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 04/10/90 4.76- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 04/10/90 87.12 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 03/29/90 19.95 PRIOR WINE MIX 50- 4628 - 822 -82 04/10/90 361.49 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 04/10/90 238.08 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 03/29/90 36.21 PRIOR WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 822 -82 03/29/90 36.21 PRIOR WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 764.93 * 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 * * * * ** 088700 03/29/90 088701 03/29/90 * * * * ** 089C33 04/05/90 089C33 04/05/90 * * * * ** 3.10 - .26- 4.56- .98- 7.95- 32.94- 5.36- 1.32- 26.12- .49- 2.84- 398.09 .00 1,647.42 1,306.55 25.50 455.10 97.90 533.65 282.80 130.50 48.95 4.840.54 1,200.00 1,200.00 * 525.00 525.00 * 110,000.00- 110,000.00 .00 QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE DENISON MN DEPT OF HEALTH CITY /EDINA CITY /EDINA POSTAGE LAB CERT PAYROLL TRANSFER PAYROLL TRANSFER 50- 3700 - 822 -82 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710- 842 -84 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 4626 - 822 -82 50- 4626 - 822 -82 50- 4626 - 842 -84 50- 4626- 862 -86 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 862 -86 50- 4628 - 862 -86 50- 4628 - 862 -86 10- 4290 - 510 -51 10- 4200 - 482 -48 50- 1010 - 000 -00 50- 1010 - 000 -00 9 * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 089G86 04/05/90 R R R R R R 089M24 04/05/90 R R R R R R 089P42 R R R R R R 093E11 093EII 093E11 093E11 093E11 093E11 093E11 093E11 093E26 093E26 093E26 093E26 093E26 093E26 093E26 093E26 093E26 093E26 093E26 093E26 093E26 093E26 093E26 093E26 093E26 093E26 R R R R R R 04/05/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90• 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 04/10/90 AMOUNT 14,105.91 14,105.91 * 16,782.20 16,782.20 * 21,927.50 21,927.50 1.84 - .60- 5.81- 15.98- 92.00 290.49 30.00, 799.04 1,187.30 2.60 - 4.57- 19.30- 1.57- 38.41- 965.33 228.63 1,920.82 78.67 .00 156.65 136.80 131.95 296.30 511.55 177.00 523.30 397.30 5,457.85 093G82 04/10/90 11.02 - 093G82 04/10/90 7.92 - 093G82 04/10/90 13.90 - 093G82 04/10/90 66.34- 093682 04/10/90 60.83- CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE MEDCENTER PHP EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS GRIGGS COOPER GRIGGS COOPER GRIGGS COOPER GRIGGS COOPER GRIGGS COOPER INSURANCE INSURANCE 03 -31 -90 PAGE 16 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4156 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4156 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4156 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842, -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA 6.68- .26- JOHNSON WINE CHECK REGISTER 093J62 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT JOHNSON WINE VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV 093G82 04/10/90 3,316.80 JOHNSON WINE GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 093G82 04/10/90 3,041.27 50- 3710 - 842 -84 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 862 -86 093G82 04/10/90 50- 3710 - 842 -84 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 822 -82 093G82 04/10/90 093J62 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 842 -84 093G82 04/10/90 04/10/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 862 -86 093J62 04/10/90 6.198.06 1,299.16 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 093J62 093J62 04/10/90 6.68- .26- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3700 - 842 -84 093J62 04/10/90 2.34- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 093J62 04/10/90 46.06- 04/10/90 JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 093J62 04/10/90 12.91- 093Q16 JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 093J62 04/10/90 4.15- 50- 3710 - 842 -84 JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 093J62 04/10/90 70.16- WINE JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 093J62 04/10/90 4.77- QUALITY JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 093J62 04/10/90 17.15 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 093J62 04/10/90 2,303.09 1,299.16 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 093J62 04/10/90 3,507.61 04/10/90 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 093J62 04/10/90 21.56 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 093J62 04/10/90 234.44 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 093J62 04/10/90 5.39 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 093J62 04/10/90 33.78- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 093J62 04/10/90 .00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 093J62 04/10/90 27.93 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 093J62 04/10/90 1,292.81 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 093J62 04/10/90 4.41 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 093J62 04/10/90 415.75 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 093J62 04/10/90 6.14- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 093J62 04/10/90. 476.77 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 093J62 04/10/90 2.48- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 093J62 04/10/90 11.27 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 8,128.71 * * * * ** 093P82 04/10/90 3.20- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 093P82 04/10/90 4.95- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 093P82 04/10/90 6.39- PRIOR.WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 093P82 04/10/90 159.76 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 093P82 04/10/90 247.40 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 093P82 04/10/90 319.57 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 712.19 * * * * ** 093Q16 04/10/90 .26- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 093Q16 04/10/90 .33- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 093016 04/10/90 25.99- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 093Q16 04/10/90 3.91- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 093Q16 04/10/90 .66- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 093Q16 04/10/90 8.12- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 093Q16 04/10/90 71.44- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 093Q16 04/10/90 1,299.16 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 093Q16 04/10/90 3,572.36 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 03 -31 -90 PAGE 17 # P.O. # MESSAGE MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER- 03 -31 -90 PAGE 18 CHECK NO. DATE' AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 093Q16 04/10/90 32.75 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 093Q16 04/10/90 25.50 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 093Q16 04/10/90 65.00 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 093Q16 04/10/90 388.25 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 093Q16 04/10/90 808.75. QUALI -TY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 6,081.06 * * * * ** * * * -CKS 267,085.95 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 1,367.95 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER 68.27 FUND 26 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUND 15,269.73 FUND 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND 11,533.75 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND 563.01 FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND 11,699.99 FUND 30 TOTAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 16,520.86 FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND 596.04 FUND 41 TOTAL STORM SEWER UTILITY 205,166.15 295,525.3i- "FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND ^'^ ^ ' °6 TOTAL 529,871.70* tl