HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-06-04_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
JUNE 4, 1990
7:00 P.M.
(Convene Joint HRA /Council Meeting)
ROLLCALL
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JOINT HRA /COUNCIL MEETINGS OF APRIL 16 AND MAY 7, 1990
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If
- - Council- wishes -to- proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote of -
all members of Council required to pass if improvement has been petitioned for;
4/5 favorable rollcall vote required if no petition.
A. Parking RamD Improvement P -4 - North Side of West 49 1/2 Street (Council /HRA)
B. 50th and France Renovation - 50th and France Commercial District (Council /HRA)
III. AWARD OF BIDS (HRA)
A.
Centennial
Lakes
Park Building -
Mechanical
B.
Centennial
Lakes
Park Building -
Electrical
C.
Centennial
Lakes
Maintenance Area
- Fireproofing
D.
Centennial
Lakes
Maintenance Area
- Electrical
IV. REAPPOINTMENTS /APPOINTMENT - EAST EDINA HOUSING FOUNDATION BOARD
V. ADJOURNMENT OF HRA
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
PROCLAMATION - Kids Club 10th Anniversary
I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS All agenda items marked with an asterisk (�,)
and in bold print are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one
motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Council
Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the
consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda.
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.,
Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing.
Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote
of all members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property
Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass.
A. Lot Division
* 1. Lot 2, Block 1, McCauley Heights 3rd Addition - 6404 -6406 McCauley
Circle
* 2. Lot 3, Block 1, Stringer's Addition and Lot 3, Block 1, Patten
Addition - 5144 Valley View Road and 6149 Code Avenue
* B. Set Hearing Date (6/18/90)
1. Final Rezoning - PCD -4 to PCD -2 Planned Commercial District -
Walgreen's by Semper Holdings, 4916 France Avenue South
C. First Reading
1. Ordinance No. 824 - Requiring Licenses and Establishing Standards for
Restricted Access Parking Lots
2. Ordinance No. 171 -A33 - To Add Fee for Licensing of Restricted Access
Parking Lots
III. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
Edina City Council Agenda
June 4, 1990
Page 2
IV. AWARD OF BIDS
A. Storm Sewer Improvement Nos. STS -204, STS -205 and STS -206 (Continue to
6/18/90)
B. Retrofit/Upgrade Lighting and Circuitry - Braemar Soccer /Football Field
C. Restrooms Remodeling - Braemar Arena
D. Southdale Water Tower Cleaning
E. Area Lighting - Braemar Clubhouse
V. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Approval of Local 49 IUOE Contract
B. Approval of Local 320 Teamsters Contract
C. Precinct No. 17 Polling Location
D. On -Sale Wine License and On -Sale Beer License - Q.Cumbers Restaurant,
7465 France Avenue South (Centennial Lakes)
E. Wine License Renewals
F. Club and Sunday Liquor License Renewals
VI. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
A. Update - Community Information.Forum
VII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
VIII. FINANCE
A. Payment of Claims per Check Register dated 06/04/90: Total $575,668.49
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/EVENTS
June 12 -15 LMC Convention
Mon June 18 Joint Meeting - Council /Art Center Committee
Regular Council Meeting
Mon July 2 Regular Council Meeting
Wed July 4 INDEPENDENCE DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed
Mon July 16 Regular Council Meeting
Mon Aug 6 Regular Council Meeting
Mon Aug 20 Joint Meeting - Council /Building Construction
Appeals Board
Regular Council Meeting
Duluth, MN
6:OO p.m. Mgrs Conf Rm
7:00 p.m. Council Room
7:00 p.m. Council Room
7:00 p.m. Council Room
7:00 p.m. Council Room
6:00 p.m. Mgrs Conf Rm
7:00 p.m. Council Room
MINUTES OF THE JOINT MEETING OF THE
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY /CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT EDINA CITY HALL
APRIL 16, 1990
A joint meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the City
Council was convened to consider concurrently: 1) Award of Bid - Centennial Lakes
Park Building Mechanical Work, and 2) Edina Schools - Rebate of Excess Tax
Increment. Action was taken by the HRA and Council as recorded.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners /Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith
and Richards.
MINUTES of HRA Meeting of April 2, 1990 were approved as submitted by motion of
Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Rice.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
BIDS FOR CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK BUILDING MECHANICAL WORK REJECTED: PROJECT TO BE
REBID Executive Director Hughes explained that the low bid for the Centennial
Lakes Park Building Mechanical Work substantially exceeded estimate. Staff would
recommend redesign and rebid.
Commissioner Smith made a motion to reject all bids for Centennial Lakes Park
Building Mechanical Work and that the project be,rebid. Motion was seconded by
Commissioner Rice.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
REQUEST OF EDINA SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR REBATE OF EXCESS TAX INCREMENTS CONTINUED TO
5 7 90 Member Rice made a motion to continue the discussion on the request of the
Edina School District for rebate of excess tax increments from the 50th A France
and Grandview districts resulting from the 1988 School District Referendum to the
meeting of May 7, 1990. Motion was seconded by Member Smith.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
Motion was made by Commissioner Kelly and was seconded by Commissioner Smith for
adjournment of the HRA. -Motion was carried unanimously.
HRA Executive Director
City Clerk
':
�fr
MINUTES OF THE JOINT MEETING OF THE
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY /CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT EDINA CITY HALL
MAY 7, 1990
A joint meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the City
Council was convened to consider concurrently: 1) Edina Schools - Rebate of Excess
Tax Increment, and 2) Awards of Bids - Centennial Lakes Projects. Action was
taken by the HRA and Council as recorded.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners /Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice and
Smith.
MINUTES of the Special Joint HRA /Council Meeting of March 26, 1990, were approved
as submitted by motion of Commissioner/Member Smith, seconded by
Commissioner/Member Rice.
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Motion carried.
REOUEST FROM EDINA SCHOOLS FOR REBATE OF EXCESS TAX INCREMENTS CONSIDERED•
DECISION MADE TO NOT REBATE HRA Executive Director Gordon Hughes, recalled that
the request from the Edina School District for rebate of excess tax increments
from the 50th & France and Grandview tax increment districts is a carryover from
last July. These excess increments resulted from the District's referendum that
was conducted in October, 1988. The theory behind this is that this is new found
and unexpected money of the HRA that is being generated by the extra mill rate and
the request is to rebate it on an annual basis to the District. It was the
understanding last July that the rebate of these excess increments would be
captured by the District if it was turned back to them.
A letter dated March 30, 1990, from Dr. James Hamann, Assistant Superintendent of
Business Services, suggested that this issue is "revenue neutral ",.and that it
would not result in additional tax dollars going to the District. It would
instead affect the formula of the aids they receive from the state as well as from
their basic levy. If the Council wishes to proceed with the rebate, it is
suggested that this be instituted for the payable 1991 taxes and that the amount
of the rebate be.conditioned on the collection of at least 95% of taxes from each
district, i.e. no more than a 5% delinquency rate of total tax revenue. Director
Hughes recommended that the rebate be applied only for 1991 and that it be
considered annually thereafter.
Commissioner /Member Paulus said.her understanding was that the School District
does not get additional money, the City does not lose, but the taxpayers get some
money back. Director Hughes quoted from Dr: Hamann's letter that "In effect, the
whole thing is revenue neutral for the School District." This does represent a
reduction in the increment that the HRA would receive but that reduction is from
increment that it did not expect to receive in the first place. The average
taxpayer would receive less than a dollar back.
Commissioner /Member Smith suggested that, with the information presented, the City
pass on any type of rebate this year, and that it be reviewed next year with Dr.
Hamann to make sure we are still in a posture of revenue neutrality. If the City
or the School District ever gets to a point where we are not, it should be brought
back for more discussion. He asked staff to keep the HRA /Council informed, with
Dr. Hamann's input.
Commissioner/Member Smith made a motion that the City pass on the Edina School
District's request for rebate of excess tax increments from the 50th & France and
Grandview tax increment districts resulting from the 1988 School District
referendum. Motion was seconded by Commissioner /Member Paulus.
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith
Nays: Kelly
R,
Motion carried.
BIDS AWARDED FOR CENTENNIAL LAKES PHASE I PARR IMPROVEMENTS Director Hughes
explained that the three bids to be considered are for the Phase I park
improvements that the HRA is undertaking for the central park area and the north
park area. He mentioned that Peter Jarvis, BRW, was present to answer any
questions.
Improvement No. PL -2 - Centennial Lakes North Pond Wall and Liner - Staff would
recommend award to the low bidder, F. M. Frattalone Excavating and Grading, Inc.,
at $625,386.66. The items are within the budget established when bonds were sold
for the Centennial Lakes project and the low bid is below the engineer's estimate
for the work.
Commissioner Smith made a motion for award of bid for Improvement No. PL -2 -
Centennial Lakes north pond wall and liner to recommended low bidder, F.M.
Frattalone Excavating & Grading, Inc., in the amount of $625,386.66. Motion was
seconded by Commissioner Rice.
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Motion carried.
Centennial Lakes Central Park West Side Improvements - Staff would recommend award
of bid to the low bidder, Shaw- Lundquist Association, at $1,496,790.20 for the
walkways, lighting, landscaping and related work for the west side of Central
Park. All items are within the budget established and are below the engineer's
estimate for the work. He stated that a letter had been received from Borgert
Products, Inc. regarding the concrete pavers specified for the project.
Craig Olson, Borgert Products, Inc., gave a synopsis of the bid process he had
been through with BRW and the City of Edina. He said he felt that his
interlocking pavers met the criteria that had been established by BRW and should
have been accepted as an approved equal. Mr. Olson said that he felt very
strongly that it is a disservice to the taxpayer to have only one material
specified. More than one product, in each category, should not only be a
responsibility but a requirement to insure that taxpayers who support these types
of projects are getting quality as well as competitive bids. He displayed samples
of the pavers made by Borgert Products and asked that his bid be considered.
Peter Jarvis, BRW, consultant, said he was a member of the committee of three that
established the standards. In their evaluation they found the Borgert pavers did
not meet those standards as to surface finish, beveled edges, turning radii on the
corners and appearance, which resulted in not accepting the Borgert pavers as an
approved equal. He said the letter dated May 4, 1990 that was drafted by Ar.ijs
Pakalns stated the BRW professional position.
Commissioner Smith questioned the similarity between this product and the pavers
used for the 50th and France area. Mr. Jarvis said that this is a totally
different product, the 50th /France product was a tile product that was inset.
Commissioner Rice asked if the committee members that made the decision were
professionals, with no special interest in the specific pavers except that they
would be the best product for the project. Mr. Jarvis stated that the committee
members are professionals with no vested interest with any of the suppliers or
manufacturers. Commissioner Rice asked further if BRW was chosen as the
professional engineering and architectural representative for the entire
Centennial Lakes project. Mr. Jarvis said that was correct.
Commissioner Smith made a motion for award of bid for Centennial Lakes Central
Park west side improvements to recommended low bidder, Shaw - Lundquist Assoc., at
$1,496,790.20. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Rice.
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Motion carried.
.l
6
Centennial lakes Park Pavilion - General Construction - Staff would recommend
award of bid for general construction for Centennial Lakes Park Pavilion to the
low bidder, Twin City Construction, at $649.543.00. Director Hughes explained
that there is no request for purchase for the electrical work and suggested that
this item be continued to be considered with the mechanical bids for the building.
Commissioner Rice made a motion for award of bid for Centennial Ickes Park.
Pavilion - General Construction to recommended low bidder, Twin -City Construction,
Construction at $649,543.00. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Paulus.
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Motion carried.
Notion was made by Commissioner Smith and was seconded by Commissioner Rice for
adjournment of the BRA. Motion was carried unanimously.
HRA Executive Director
City Clerk
e
o
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
HRA/ COUNCIL
Agenda Item #
HRA
II . A. & B.
From:
GORDON L. HUGHES
Consent
❑
HRA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
FRANCIS HOFFMAN
Information Only
Date:
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
JUNE 4, 1990
Mgr. Recommends
❑
X
To HRA
Subject:
El
To Council
PARKING
50TH AND
RAMP IMPROVEMENT. P-4
FRANCE RENOVATION
Action
0
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Authorize Improvements P -4 and HRA /90 -10.
Info /Background:
On June 4, 1990, the Council and HRA will conduct a public hearing
concerning two public improvement projects at 50th & France. Improvement
P -4 is a 154 car ramp to be located north of 49 1/2 Street. Improvement
HRA /90 -10 is an overall renovation of sidewalks, street furnishing,
pedestrian lighting, etc. Owners and tenants of property at 50th & France
have been advised of the hearing as have residents adjoining the proposed
parking ramp.
1989 PROPOSED PROJECT
On May 15, 1989, the City Council authorized Improvement Project #89 -9, for
the 50th & France commercial area. The proposed project was a relatively
modest renovation estimated to cost $700,000.00.. The project involved
replacement of sidewalk pavers and the refurbishing of kiosks and street
furnishings. Replacement of pedestrian lighting and parking improvements
Report and Recommendation /HRA /Council
50th & France Projects
June 4, 1990
Page Two
were not part of the 1989 project. For a variety of reasons, bids were not
taken and construction contracts were not let for the 1989 project.
Since the May, 1989, hearing, some concern has been expressed that the
proposed renovation project was too modest in light of the potential
disappearance of tax increment financing. Based on this concern, the
business and professional association established a steering committee to
work with staff to consider upgrading the project. To assist in the urban
design elements, the HRA retained BRW, which was the original project
designers for the 1975 renovation.
The steering committee, the staff, and the consultant, met on several
occasions since last January. The concepts which were developed by the
steering committee and staff were presented to the full membership of the
50th & France Business and Professional Association on May 9, 1990. All
owners of property and tenants at 50th & France have been advised of the
June 4, 1990, hearing.
50TH & FRANCE HISTORY
The City and the HRA established the 50th & France redevelopment area and
tax increment financing district in 1974. HRA undertook the initial
redevelopment project in 1975 and 1976. This project included the
construction of the 49 1/2 Street parking ramp, expansion of the 51st
Street parking ramp, and numerous sidewalk roadway landscaping and lighting
improvements. 'In 1977 and 1978, additional improvements at 50th & France
were undertaken, including the carillon tower and fountain as well as work
in the vicinity of Arby's Restaurant on France Avenue. In 1988, the 51st
Street parking ramp was expanded by approximately 115 parking spaces.
The initial redevelopment project was financed through a combination of
special assessments and tax increment financing. For these improvements,
208 of the project costs were assessed against benefitted properties and
the remaining 808 were financed through tax increment financing, state aid,
and CDBG Funds. The special assessments, which were levied on a floor area
basis, totalled approximately.$2.15 /sq. ft. of assessable floor area. The
1988 expansion of the 51st Street parking ramp was likewise financed
through a combination of special assessment and tax increment financing.
In this case, approximately 308 of the ramp costs were assessed against the
Edina Theatre, and the balance of the cost financed by tax increments. No
businesses other than the Edina Theatre were assessed for the 51st Street
ramp expansion.
STATUS OF TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT
On March 26, 1990. the City sold an additional $3,000,000 of General
Obligation Bonds for the 50th & France tax increment district. This bond
sale insured the existence of this tax increment district through year .
2008. This bond sale was undertaken based upon the contemplated project
cost for the improvements which will be considered on June 4.
Report /Recommendation HRA /Council
50th & France Projects
June 4, 1990
Page Three
PROPOSED PARKING RAMP IMPROVEMENT - P -4
The parking ramp improvement project proposes a 154 car parking ramp on the
north side of 49 1/2 Street, west of Edina Realty. This improvement would
result in a net parking addition of 95 spaces. The ramp would be designed
to accommodate an additional parking level in the future that would contain
70 spaces. The maximum height of the proposed structure on the north�is 19
feet. The estimated cost is $924,000. (Refer to attached report from
Walker Parking Consultants)
Ramp construction in this location presents some design challenges. First,
the site adjoins residential property to the north, therefore an attempt
has been made to limit height. Second, the ramp is designed to permit
access to the rear of the Edina Realty Building,,as well as to the rear of
Hooten's Cleaners, and the Doctor's Building. Representatives of our
consultant, Walker Parking Consultants, will be present on June 4, 1990, to
answer questions concerning the ramp design.
PARKING STUDY
Staff conducted a parking inventory at 50th & France during the months of
April through December 1989. A copy of the results of this inventory is
attached. Parking counts were generally taken three times a week during
the peak parking hours identified by the business association. During
particularly busy times of the year, more frequent counts were taken. Our
parking inventory continues to show principally a parking distribution and
convenience problem, rather than a quantity problem. The average peak hour
occupancy for all public parking was 73 %. However, public parking located
north of 50th Street experienced a peak hour average of 85 %, while public
parking located south of 50th Street showed a 62% average. The maximum
observed occupancy was 97% on the day after Thanksgiving, followed by 91%
on June 30. The renovation of the Sheridans Antique Store for restaurant
uses, and the potential construction of Walgreen's is if approved, would
exacerbate this parking distribution problem. In our view, the proposed
parking project should provide ample parking even with the above mentioned
restaurant and drug store projects.
RENOVATION PROJECT
BRW will make a detailed presentation of the renovation project on June 4,
1990. Significant elements of this project would be replacement of
existing sidewalks from curb to storefront with concrete pavers.
Replacement of wood street furnishing and bollards with metal furnishings.
Installation of new pedestrian lighting, replacement of kiosks and carillon
tower with new structures and replacement of alley canopies. Again this
renovation project has been designed in close consultation with 50th &
France Business and Professional Association. The estimated cost of the
project is $2,134,000.00.
r - ``,
Report /Recommendation HRA /Council
50th & France Projects
June 4, 1990
Page Four
PROJECT SCHEDULE
If approved, the proposed parking ramp project would commence in March,
1991, and would be completed in August, 1991. The renovation project is
proposed to take place in the fall of 1990, with completion by June, 1991.
The project would start in mid - September, 1990, with partial sidewalk
removal, underground work, lighting and some street furnishings installed
by Thanksgiving, 1990. Temporary walkways would be installed where-needed
for the winter months. Final sidewalk installation would occur in the
spring of 1991, and would be finished by June 1, 1991.
PROJECT FINANCE
Staff recommends the same formula for project financing as was developed
with the 1975 project. We suggest that 80% of the project costs would be
financed through tax increment financing with the remaining 20% specially
assessed against benefitted properties. We propose to assess only
commercial properties at 50th & France - no residential properties are
proposed to be assessed. As with the 1975 assessment, we recommend that
both the parking project and the renovation project be assessed on a
floor -area basis, with basement areas use solely for storage purposes
assessed at a 10% rate. We also suggest for both projects, that the floor
area of buildings containing enclosed malls should be reduced by the floor
area of the mall. As to the parking assessment, we recommend that
businesses which provide private parking should receive a 200 sq.
ft. /parking stall deduction from their gross floor area. We recommend,
however, that the sum of all credits should not reduce the gross floor area
by more than 50 %. Based on the assessable floor areas for these two
projects, we estimate the proposed parking assessment at $.58 /sq. ft. and
the proposed renovation assessment at $1.14 /sq. ft. of assessable floor
area.
ALTERNATIVES
The City Council may approve both projects, either project or neither of
the two projects. The Council may also increaseror decrease the proportion
of the improvement cost which are financed through tax increment financing.
The Council may also alter the assessment methodology of the special
assessment. As noted earlier, the proposed assessment follows the method
which is used in 1975.
May 8, 1990
Mr..Gordon Hughes
Assistant City Manager
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Re: Edina 49 -1/2 Proposed Parking Facility
(WALKER Commission No. M2435.00)
Dear Mr. Hughes:
Parking Consultants
Restoration Engineers
The City of Edina current has a high utilization of parking spaces
in the northern section of the Central Business District. In
addition to peak utilizations nearing capacity, two developments
have been proposed which will increase the pressure on parking
supply:
A. Walgreens Drug Store
(8300 SF + 3000 SF Storage)
B. Restaurant
(Seats 60 + 6 Staff)
This will likely increase demand by an additional 60 parking
spaces less the 16 -20 parking spaces provided by the projects to
meet the increased parking needs.
To meet the increased parking needs, several parking solutions
were considered, including:
A. Providing a parking ramp on the site of the current
parking lot at 49 -1/2 Avenue.
B. Bridging 49 -1/2 Avenue to the north ramp.
C. Requiring employees to park in the south ramp which
would free up spaces in the north ramp.
D. Providing a parking ramp adjacent to Clancy's.
SOLUTION
It appears the best solution would be a combination of A and C,
that is, construct a parking ramp on the parking lot and require
employees to park in the south ramp to free up spaces for retail
customers in the northern area of the CBD.
The site is currently a parking lot approximately 185 feet by 133
feet with 59 parking spaces. Access to the parking spaces behind
Edina Realty, the Doctors Building, and Hootens is provided
through this lot.
410 Thresher Square
700 Third Street South
Minneapolis, MN 55415
612 / 332 -PARK
Mr. Gordon Hughes
May 8, 1990
Page 2
FUNCTION
Entry would be on the east end of the site adjacent to Edina
Realty. Exit would be on The function to the
Doctors Office Building. threaded
helix with one -way traffic and 75 degree angled parking. The
facility would be 114' wide and 180' long to maximize par ing on
the site. The height of the structure would be app Y 14
feet above grade at the east and west ends, and rise to
ly 19 feet above grade in the center. This will
approximate
provide parking for approximately 154 cars with 81-611 wide - parking
spaces (a net gain of 95 cars).
Additional levels could be
provided now or the foundation sized for levels to be added at a
future time as parking demand dictates. Exceeding the 19 foot
height would require a variance from the setback requirements. A
stair tower would be located at the southeast corner of the
facility adjacent to Edina Realty. An elevator is not required.
Vehicular access to the adjacent properties parking lots can be
maintained.
The facility can be designed to visually screen, the: parked
vehicles from the residences to the north. The facade will blend
with the character of the downtown businesses.
1991 Construction Cost Estimate
Construction Cost
Contingency (@ 10 %)
Design and Testing Fees
(@ 10 %).
Total
Cost /Space
(154 Spaces)
Cost per Added Space
(95 Spaces)
$770,000 ($5,000 per car)
$ 77,000
$ 77,000
$924,000
$ 6,000 (Including Contingency & Fees)
$ 9,700 (Including Contingency & Fees)
The above cost estimate is based on projected 1991 prices and does
not include the cost of land, legal fees, or financing costs. We
have included the 10$ contingency at this time due to unknown soil
conditions, a limited construction site, and undefined
architectural requirements. In addition, the final car count may
not be exact due to structure restraints, handicap parking
requirements, access to adjacent lots, and final stair tower
location.
�cer
Mr. Gordon Hughes
May 8, 1990
Page 3
PROJECT SCHEDULE
We anticipate the following project schedule:
Authorization to
Proceed with Project
Preliminary Design Complete
Bidding Documents Complete
Bidding Period
Construction to Start
Construction Completion
DATE
June 1990
July
September
October
March 1, 1991
TIME
4 Weeks
10 Weeks
4 Weeks
August 1, 1991 5 Months
We have appreciated the opportunity to update the 1987 study and
look forward to working with you on this project. We remain
available to answer any questions you may have regarding this
information.
Sincerely,
!�{ - °"'
Terrence A. Hakkola, P.E.
Chief Engineer.
TAH /bjp:mm5 -8a
Enclosures: Site Plan
Expanded View
wa per
t IO'
-�
NOW
ow
O tom--
.
_ g•
EXPANDED VIEW LOOKING NORTH
o � o Y
o o
2 A LEVELS d
ISO' x 114'
-7d
Comes
19' HEIGHT
154 CARS - 2 LEVEL
� --w
North
SITE PLAN
5 -8-90
ER
4-a
(D
-OW
r-
Parking Lot
Edina
Five 0
s
.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Craig Larsen , City Planner
FROM: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner /7
SUBJECT: 50th and France Municipal Parking Study
DATE: January 24, 1990
Surveillance of the municipal parking ramps and surface lots at 50th and France
was conducted from April through December, 1989. Inspections took place on a
weekly basis with an increase during the Christmas holiday season to include
suspected peaks in parking demand (i.e. day after Thanksgiving and weekends).
Results from our previous study conducted from January through March 1989,
indicated that the peak times for parking occured during the 12:00 p.m. -
3:00 p.m. period; consequently, the data for this study was collected during
that peak period.
As with our previous study, a spread sheet was compiled showing the date, time,
and number of cars in each lot. This information was then addressed on a monthly,
basis in which we calculated the average occupancy for each facility during the
month and also the day during each month when maximum occupancy for all the
parking facilities was observed.
The accompanying graph and chart represent the results of this most recent
study.
AVI:RA(d:
'ram.
8t7
967
977
NORTH RAMP
AVERAGE OCCUPANCY DURING PEAK HOURS / MAXIMUM OBSERVED OCCUPANCY
PARKING FACILITIES
251
&
APR 11, MAY AIINI•: .IUI.Y AUGUST SI•:1'TEMBI'li I1(:'I'l)BER NOVEMBER D1•'CEMRI:It
Sl'A(:I: AVAII.AIill.l'I'Y
226
234 /
Aver. /Max. Aver. /Max.. Aver. /Max. Aver. /Max. Aver. /Max. Aver. /Max. Aver. /Max. Aver./Max. Aver. /M x
215 / 229
4 -14 5 -5 6 -30 7 -7 B -15 9 -15 10 -10 11 -24 1I -x,2
W. 49} St. 59 Spaces
57 / 59
56 / 57
54 / 55
53 / 53
48 / 51
50 / 59
47 / 44
47 / 64
511 / 59
(64 Spaces Nov /Dec)
86
76 /
85
83 /
86
79 / 82
73 /
83
70
/ 74
84 /
88
77
/ 82
89'7,.
'Level 2
90 Spaces
83 / 90
82
CLANCY'S 36 Spaces
34 / 32
35 / 36
35 / 36
35 / 33
34 / 35
3:1 / 31
36 / 36
35 / ;16
15 / 36
LIQUOR STORE 16 Spaces
15 / 16
15 / 15
15 / 15
15 / 15
15 / 16
16 / 16
16 / 16
16 / 16
16 / 16
92
53 /
53
62 /
84
63 / 69
64 /
78
68
215
/ 76
/ 236
AVI:RA(d:
'ram.
8t7
967
977
NORTH RAMP
271 Spaces
252 / 268
251
/
267
196 /
226
234 /
256
215 / 229
217 /
248
210 / 228
243 /
270
230 / 241
84% .:
Level 1
88 Spaces
88 / 85
82
/
86
76 /
85
83 /
86
79 / 82
73 /
83
70
/ 74
84 /
88
77
/ 82
89'7,.
'Level 2
90 Spaces
83 / 90
82
/
89
67 /
88
89 /
86
73 / 78
80 / 87
72
/ 78
86 /
90
85
/ 86
897
Level 3
93 Spaces
86 / 93
87
/
92
53 /
53
62 /
84
63 / 69
64 /
78
68
215
/ 76
/ 236
73 /
278 /
92
382
68
243
/ 73
/ 292
75%
61%
SOUTH RAMP 4118 Spaces
205 / 221
245 / 250
303 / 390
279 / 329
262 / 304
214 / 234
Level 1
121 Spaces
107. / 112
109
/
109
108 /
113
111 /
118
115 / 117
102 /
118
108
/ 112
104 /
8(1 /
75 /
116
1o0
104
106
84
51
/ 116
/ 96
/ 75
89%
687
53%
Level 2 104 Spaces
53 / 55
74 / 74
87 / 100
89 / 102
77 / 99
49 / 52
60 / 60
57 / 57
Level 3 110 Spaces
26 / 33
44 / 53
82 / 108
72 / 99
63 / 77
55 / 60
Level 4
73 Spaces
19 / 21
18
/
14
26 /
69
7 /
10
7 / 11
3 /
4
5
/ 7
19 /
62
2
/ 3
16%
GRAND TOTAL
(Average)
790 Spaces
(795 Nov /Dec)
71%
76%
76%
78%
737.•
67%
66%
78%
72%
7:17
Spuces Used
60
50
4 0
.30
20
1
West 49th 112 St. Parking
A verage Occupancy During Peak Hours
1989 Sample
M
57
59
56
57
55
53
53
59
! p.! 11;
IrIIII "rb
I' II
59
4 rlllil .il
I
51 50 '
50
I
I
I
I'
48 I
. h I il: ��
l I�I,U ; I
�II IIII 1111'1!'1
47 47
44 lli;l
��;1� I
III!
11
�IIIluhljlllll
I I .a u i
611 II,II!1i!
I
II I
' I
_Iq�
i I
IIIIi,t1
II'
I
II
III
1 I
I,
III
-- II'
1 I III,
I
.III
i VcI
X
I
III
II�
II II,1
VIII
I I !LII
,11
IpIIII
IIII.
1 I I
III I'I I'
II
I' 1.
I I �I
p'I
11.11h
b
il. I�
�I�,jII II
I � :1Iy!ll ill r.11i'
III'I I I I I I I I I
'1 14 I IIII
I I
Il ''i1111110,
I I I IIIIII
'114�I1111; 1'll'Ij
I I
1 161 P1; I
I'lil
�1 I:
FLIP, ..
II
,;Ll illl l,..i;
II
w11I
''IIIyl
111'I
1
I I
II'PI''I'1
j' 'I�'11111
II
(
111111111
I
I
IIII I!II,I
I
"I IIII�N
I IuI
�
„I I r1; j1
1 I�II� Illilll a.
� k 11- 1
Ili Ili I
'I'I I
11IIrti1 I,
.'I I'.
II
I
IlIl4!IhIII
1 I I
I II
I I hl
"'`.�
11
Ir�''!Ill.11ijj
4 1u Irl' � II,I,I .,
�'Jynry n
r,lf 1
1, 1 I
1 Ir, III
I,h 11
I
I 11 I
�L,; u
— III
,�;ll,l�;,
1l
,
III
IhI
y II'
1 III
�-
I� ! 1111
� I II1�11„I
I
111u %Hi
IIIIII'1�1,1j1
,1
21
66
I I I II''1�
11111 :,
NI
iq�I�l'
III:
I TL. lli:;
I il'
h
�
I I1�'hl[II'�i11
"�I III '6 I:
I_ -1 FII,! d
!14'I!Illl. ,,,;I�
I M1..I I 1�Nlli
Illlilll hll
fill'
t
14 iil
,'�I
-
1
IIIIIII
IIII
I i!
1
11
,'I
II ;NI
111
II4
! II
�h 1111
11 I I i
I 11-
I I
11'�
li I
I' i
IIII
I IIII 1
11, III' II n I
1 111 1
111 1
I i y11 I
,.11.
111 1'
III �II I
J Iljli
I
„- 11 -
— I�' I
I�1 [I
IIII!
it 1
1 I I
F�''I111
' INI
I III
'IG
fIL1
M1 I Ili'' 111 i i :i
u
11 IIII :
N III III
i 1iN i
I
I 111� 1 I
qll hl'II
14
�! 11.
1�1I
1
41:111111
NIiIIP
p�l
I�1 III
1 1,
II. I,
,I
iI+ II'q
IIII III III
III "' I I.
14 C �
,1
I, 1
.1
II11� I:
I'
- �I
11111
IIII
�':
billip
�I,
II.
11''
Ilulll
i.Il
tlti
IyI�I
1 h
I �
1 III.
lIj11111Ii III
11 11JL, ll
I
'111u
14!II,1�111
I,I,I LII,
L.
1111
IH
,:. L
I
I;:,1 VIII,r':I�!,
� I,; 1111
III I II..III 11111' lilt I111Ij
3i iii III IIII ill
I II'1 I I;1'�III1n,
' �iil III
1
II 1 111:1,11 ? Ilp,llli'
II u11 ?,h Lf 1,
1111,�I111' IIII',
1
Iii
j41 ilk;.
11,.
P,I;I ,
IILI I i 111
P 1'111111;,
� Ip I: I
I�1111
'���
IIIIII
- 14I
I I
�
111 "'IIy�
(IIII
,�I1E
I
(1111
1111111111111
11 I
11111:1;1
I � ,I
I
I III YI 1,1
� I
i I,
III I
II
1 I
IIII
L.
1!14 H,
II j
III IIII IIIIII IIII il;�
I�F.:I I l�!il_I.
rl: II; L.
I IIII II�
-I I IIII: I III'
'I1. ll.lhll li I
h11�1:,
VIII �I�
:III IIII
1 I IL,
il�l•1111,1
I
I III!
III! III 11111E
It -I. 1,14.i;
�I I'
�. III
Inl .II
hnl
I ,
I,1.111L11
"I III
IIG'idll
��I Il �`i'�.. 1'1111 -,.Iji
I!
III :jjI '1
If II II ',
i 1 1111.:1
L lil
„ III
.:1.
1 .4
,�I
11161
I q,ll`.I,u� III
I I .I-
1.
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sel_) Oct Nov Dec
Month
0 Average EM Max. Observed Occup.
Capacity — 59 Spaces (64 ' for Nov /Dec 89)
Study Conducted April though December 1989
Spaces Used
30
10
C/ancy's Parking
A verage Occupancy During Peak Hours
1989 Sample
'la Za 9a ]a aa 13 a
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Month
0 Average "`l Max Observed Occup
Capacity 36 spaces
Study Conducted April though December 1989
a
Spaces UseY6
1111072
10
5
M
Liquor Store Parking
Average Occupancy During Peak Hours
1989 Sample
16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Month
Average E Max.Observed Occup
Capacity — 16 spaces
Study Conducted April though December 1989
15
15
is
15 1
IN,
-rip
.II
II
IIII
(ill Itl
'1,
I�I
I :III
pII ryI'
I'4 I
VIII
II�
it j
'I I'
I
�tll'II!I I I IIIII
NO
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Month
Average E Max.Observed Occup
Capacity — 16 spaces
Study Conducted April though December 1989
Spaces Used
200
100
C
North Ramp
Average Occupancy During Peak Hours
1989 Sample
163
267
270
252
251
248
I
226
234
I
j
229
228
243 ;
230
241
I
215
I, 217
210
I
1.1
it
1
196
r
j
11'
' 'I
1;111.1
f
jlili;!
�!
_
Il r
I n!
i
I
1 1III�I
II
.l
I'
I
I•. �,
1 I i
� 1.. 1
I
I•I I
I• ,
I
I.I
I
I I
L ki
'II I�• I
ilill;i'111�r�1
Illlllill
1 161 �i
I II I
I
�f11
II�1 II
Ij I
II;I IIIIII!II'IIIII
II
,'p'''1I
1'Iljllll
Illll
j'I
II!I
I
III II
111
I,
IIII
'I
I1 illli�'�I
Ili
I
11,
I I
, rj
r
r II
I kk
jll
r IIII
IIII IIII
IIj
il$I�
I I
dII
Il ,III
u�I it
1II'li '1161:11
141 .r lil.Ilt
I,y rll'll
11
I
rlli II'
l' 1'
I
64i
rlll :I!
LI 0
Ii
111111,
I'� Ni i
Illl
Li.;a
I
i'I ili
l ,
— I
IIIIr11
1117
I II
IIII�II
I'
111111
I�,
I
yl I
I�
�
Ill.',
IIi (irlli
I ll.
I
�I
111
li
IIII 1,11
plr I
� Ir..1
I hi „ I
Ilr !'
, III'Il,
I
I �Iljr
I —:il'
II
!
I'.I
Ihflil I,I .
h41.iI I
'(1'il
i 'IIi
lil I
�,
:I
Ili 1111';1!1,
I il�pri
�I,;�1;11'
;I!11!Ib;;l1
�I
"�I1 %I;I
I'ijq
�r:'I�'
;,;1111:;1
n-
I
lil
I i�Il
111
IA
1
'11
I I
'�I
PI�,pIj
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Month
Average Max.Observed Occup.
Capacity — 271 spaces
Study Conducted April though December 1989
Spaces Used
400
300
200
Dili
7
South Ramp Parking
Average Occupancy During Peak Hours
1989 Sample
_
_
382
I
329
303
1
304
292
2791
...262 278
245
I' � Il,ph
243
1250
221
li
I 234 236
it
'
I!,
I G
�II
205
�
214. ..Ii 215
II
I
, .uI I I I
IhII (III!II� 111
I I � I
I
II
I1
I
'I
11111111 „I Idil
I II' IIII III IN� II III
III
'I'! 'I
1
I
I i
I! I
rl yi II I'I II I
I
I j11F
I I II �
I, I ; I
II: I I�I'!:I ! II III;• f I
1 ,I I I hl'!, I ,.i �! a I „IIIII' Ihj III
�m
III
11111iali
I ', Ii II I� 1
' I I, 11 YI'I
1 f I'' n� ;114 • tl
li� ,
I'I�
r,. N . Nh.,P:
ry 11�! „' L II �a �.I'11
III i
�I
I��,'lllli...
IIII fl Ij!
1 (I' ry I' II I
1 II 1 11111 �I
1 N' ' �jIJ.
I I,�I
rl �llai,l
I � 1P'
�hl I Iu
II
�II•.I II I'I a''INI_'I ,
� I IIII I LJ:. 111�16�II I I° I 'III I
141 yi'fI!' IW'1--jll! Ih ,,jhgl;
; '
I
I'
'' 'I:ilIi11lIh1i4'�Il11iI:1 l Nji III
;Ill�Il
ilh l ll.'I
IIII”
IIhI,,lI
'II '1
I I'll I” ' ,
II Nll'i .w
L j I
IVl„�I�ry„
I I �i
!� III�
�I III � ia lIi;aIIllI I ,I
I'iI�II
.
I1 I I'(I , I '
! = �: :
{ . l lN j�"l I � iII ,
I III ' ' l I : '
I '� IN1
� 6�
I;��I
I l 1 I
I!fl ', lI1IIlr I�'II 1�I :! Il;y
' . I IiihIi l•lI,
h
I
IhI I''. �I�I" IlIII �Y
; I
!I
I
I
IjlIl
i i 1 �
iI II
i IIt I , lI j„ 11I '1,II�1I' !I
I � II� 'l'
1,li I .illI
j,I''i!II
I ��I III I
i il I I I t
'
'
t
III
I IL
l Ill
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Month
0 Average 11 Max.Observed Occup
Capacity — 408 spaces.
Study Conducted April though December 1989
Spaces Used
800
ffl
200
Total 50th & France Parking
A verage Occupancy During Peak Hours
1989 Sample
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct
Month
® Average NJ l! Max.Observed Occup.
Capacity — 790 Spaces (795 Nov /Dec)
Study Conducted April though December 1989
Nov Dec
722
,I
686
,
599 602 625 603
616
635 619
642
563
580 588
560
574
530 '� I 524 I
Ij �II
�
II '
I
III,
1i911ylil�al�
!'
II I I
�I
i! '
� all�Il J'I� lirl
p. II I llil IIllljlllj' II III!I{ I
-allh
rap
111111 I
II �Illd
I!IIIINI;;
11
_;
�
I II�1..II r I "��
�IIIIIIyy���I',,I
II �
III� 'I ��
I' I
,I`II. 1111:; iPIIIIIIIIhI I II II
I, IIIiI,!,I�II
ill
I'uI
r
II'. I Fil
i II,, -I, III
Ip��pI,ll,llllil,. N Y�III�:
I IIII
III�II
I�
IQ
pil I
��II!I
II 11i�
Irl�
IIN,,111.
II
I' I I III11� I I:I I i li I,
,IIII !.:I �ul. .. II I'lll; II
��. �� III.IU', 'III III � III��' IIIII�I�I��
( ILIA i, II
I, �n:
�I
I
iII I
I�I�I�.II
N�I II I
_
I II 51 I'I
VIII lil II I lli"
li: I I .III
VIII'
III
jl�l�
I I
I
. I,I�
'ilI
I'
IIII
II
1I1 I
11IiIlI1�
�h,,li�'l I!I 1
I ;I I;,'; Ills I . I1' I I''
I I I I III I II I Il11 III I II
II ll�l�jl
II
I' i�l III
II. II
� II
I'� r
IH''ll
Ll�l I
IIII I
I� II III
'i.
I II I�
I, I
I
II
i II
I
I
; ,III!iiill
Ijl IIIM'�!
IIII' III
I'�II
�is lilll
u:IlullilN
1
III I
i
II'I
II!IIIIIiII lllgjjlll: I.
I I I hltll ,Inl''�I i
I I I Illl�lil ��!I;I'lll' 'lllluja,ll
Ip' I I�I III�IINiii! �lljl�l!I'I I I r�llh, i
I lil':I!;V�III Ii�l�lr� I' I .11l,ll4ll�lll
II
I,IIIIII'
III'�uII�
: .I
I ILIVI�I
III
I�II�IIIIIIII,,
Illulll'lll,l
l p II�NjI
�N�;;I
II,
III jll
„Mali
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct
Month
® Average NJ l! Max.Observed Occup.
Capacity — 790 Spaces (795 Nov /Dec)
Study Conducted April though December 1989
Nov Dec
Spaces Used
1007.
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
Month
Average Max.Observed Occup.
Capacity — 790 Spaces (795 Nov /Dec)
Study Conducted April though December 1989
Total 50th & France Parking
Percent Occupied During Peak Hours
1989 Sample
Oct Nov' Dec
01
'A\
Cn
0
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
KENNETH ROSLAND
Agenda Item #
II.
C. 1.
From.
CRAIG LARSEN
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Date.
JUNE 4, 1990
Mgr . Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
ORDINANCE NO. 824,
0
To Council
REQUIRING LICENSES FOR
RESTRICTED ACCESS
Action
❑
Motion
PARKING LOTS
❑
Resolution
0
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
First Reading of Ordinance.
INFO /BACKGROUND
The proposed ordinance has been revised and has been reviewed by Tom Erickson.
Section 17 requires free access to buildings within a restricted access parking
lot. The Ordinance does, however, provide for waiver of the requirement if
free access is not feasible. In that case a fifteen minute grace period is
required.
ORDINANCE NO. 824
AN ORDINANCE REQUIRING LICENSES AND
ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR RESTRICTED
ACCESS PARKING LOTS, AND IMPOSING A PENALTY
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Definitions.
"City" means the City of Edina, Minnesota.
"Council" means the City Council of the City.
"Director" means the Director of Public Works and Engineering of the
City of Edina, or his designated representative.
"Free parking lot" means a parking lot to which access is unrestricted.
"Motor vehicle" means every vehicle which is self - propelled and not
deriving its power from overhead wires.
"Motor vehicle reservoir area" means the area at the entrance of a
restricted access parking lot between the public street right -of -way line and the point
at which access to the parking lot is restricted.
"Parking lot" means any area with ten (10) or more parking spaces used
for the parking or storing of motor vehicles, including, without limitation, parking
ramps as defined in the Zoning Ordinance, which is operated for the benefit of
persons such as, but not limited to, employees, members, customers, patrons, clients
or visitors.
"Restricted access parking lot" means a parking lot to which access is
restricted by mechanical or other means.
"Zoning Ordinance" means the Ordinance No. 825 of the City as it may
now or hereafter be amended, revised supplemented and including any successor
ordinance to said Ordinance No. 825.
Sec. 2. License Required. No person shall own or operate, or, in any
way offer to operate, a restricted access parking lot without a license for that parking
lot first being obtained pursuant to this ordinance.
Sec. 3. License Procedure and Enforcement Penalty. The provisions of
Ordinance No. 141 of the City, including the enforcement and penalty provisions
thereof, shall apply to all licenses required by this ordinance and to the holders of
such licenses.
Sec. 4. Application for License. Any person desiring a license to own
or operate a restricted access parking lot shall file an application with the City Clerk
on forms provided by the Clerk. The application shall contain, in addition to the
information required by Ordinance No. 141 of the City, a plot plan, the name of the
owner of the parking lot and the name of the manager or operator of the parking lot
if different from the owner. The plot plan shall show such information as is
required by the Zoning Ordinance for the parking lot to be licensed, and by other
applicable codes, ordinances or regulations of the City, including, without
limitation, all entrances and exits, the location of motor vehicle reservoir areas, the
interior circulation system of the parking lot, the dimensions and grade of the
parking lot and of all entrances and exits, drainage from the parking lot, the location
and design of attendant buildings, the location of emergency vehicle access, the
location and size of self - service ticket vendors, landscaping or screening as required
by the Zoning Ordinance, the location, size and shape of all signs, the location,
height and kind of outdoor lights, and the location of,the free access driveway as and
if required by Section 17(a) hereof. No application shall be considered complete
unless the plot plan for the parking lot has been determined by the Director to
comply with all requirements and standards of this ordinance and other applicable
ordinances, codes and regulations of the City.
Sec. S. Procedure; Approval by Director. Prior to the issuance of a
license, the Director shall determine if the parking lot complies with all the
provisions and standards of this ordinance and other applicable ordinances, codes
and regulations of the City, including, without limitation, the provisions ofthe
Zoning Ordinance. If all such provisions are met, and proper application has been
made, the City may grant the license.
Sec. 6. License Fee. A license fee shall be paid as provided in
Ordinance No. 171 of the City. (Note: The following list of fees is for Council
information; it will not be a part of this ordinance as adopted. The fees are proposed
to be as follows: There shall be an original license fee of $500.00 for all restricted
access parking lots, payable with the original application. Thereafter, annual license
fees shall be:
0-50 parking spaces
$100.00
51 -100 parking spaces
$150.00
101 -200 parking spaces
$250.00
Over 200 parking spaces
$400.00)
Sec. 7. Expiration Date. All licenses issued under this ordinance shall
expire on the 31st day of December following its date of issuance.
2
Sec. 8. Insurance Required. Each licensee under this ordinance at all
times shall keep in full force and effect a public liability insurance policy written by
an insurance company authorized to do business in Minnesota, in the following
minimum amounts: fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) property damage; one hundred
thousand dollars ($100,000) for injury or death of one person; and five hundred
thousand dollars ($500,000) for injuries or death from each occurrence. A certificate
of insurance shall be filed with the City Clerk.
Sec. 9. Revocation, Suspension, Denial of License. A license granted
under this ordinance may be revoked, suspended or denied pursuant to the
provisions of Ordinance No. 141 of the City. Violations of any of the terms of this
ordinance shall be cause for revocation, suspension, or refusal to renew a license.
Sec. 10. Inspection Required; Notice Correction of Violations. At such
tunes as deemed necessary by the City, the Director shall cause every restricted access
parking lot located within the City to be inspected. In the event a restricted access
parking lot is found not in compliance with any of the provisions of this ordinance
or of any other applicable ordinance, code or regulation of the City, the City may
proceed to enforce this ordinance pursuant to the procedures set out in this
ordinance, or Ordinance No. 141 of the City or pursuant to the procedures set out in
the ordinance, code or regulation which is not being complied with.
Sec. 11. Motor Vehicle Reservoir. A restricted access parking lot shall
have a motor vehicle reservoir area at each entrance from- a public right -of - -way.
The motor vehicle reservoir area for a restricted access parking lot shall have at least
four (4) eight and one half (81/2) foot by twenty (20) foot spaces. The motor vehicle
reservoir area shall be conspicuously outlined with pavement paint and shall not be
used for the parking or storage of motor vehicles or for any other. use which
hinders, restricts or prevents use of such area as a motor vehicle reservoir.
Sec. 12. Placement of Motor Vehicles. No motor vehicle shall be
parked in a manner that would prevent reclamation of any motor vehicle upon
request. If claim checks are used to restrict access to the restricted access parking lot,
then at no time shall any driver with a current claim check be refused the
opportunity to obtain his motor vehicle, provided the driver has paid accumulated
parking charges.
Sec. 13. Emergency Vehicle Access. Each restricted access parking lot
shall be designed or operated in a manner approved by the Director so as to allow
emergency vehicles to access the building or buildings served by the restricted access
parking lot at any time without a claim check and without going through a motor
vehicle reservoir area. Such emergency vehicle access at all times shall be kept free
3
of motor vehicles, snow, ice, fill, rubbish, or any other material or thing which will
or may block such access.
Sec. 14. Claim Check. When a motor vehicle is left for parking in a
restricted access parking lot, the driver will be furnished with a claim check on
which shall be printed the full name of the operator, the address of the parking lot,
the license number under which the parking lot is operating, and the date and time
of issuance of the claim check.
- - - - -- Sec. - -15. - Attendant Buildings. Attendant buildings shall be located only
at exits to restricted access parking lots and shall be located no closer than twenty (20)
feet from the street right -of -way. Minimum standards for the materials and general
design of attendant buildings shall be as follows:
(a) Attendant buildings shall have a minimum floor area
sufficient to accommodate the normal complement of
parking lot operating personnel. The building shall be
enclosed and weather tight. It shall be equipped with an
operable and lockable door and window. It shall be set on
a curb or platform rising a minimum of six (6) inches
above the adjacent lot paving. Service connections shall
be in accordance with applicable codes and ordinances of
the City.
(b) Exterior wall finishes shall be one, or a combination of,
the following: face brick, natural stone, glass or
prefinished metal panels.
(c) All building plans for attendant buildings shall be
submitted to the Building Official of the City to determine
compliance with this ordinance and all other applicable
codes, ordinances, and regulations of the City.
(d) Attendant buildings shall be kept clean and in good
condition and state of repair at all times.
Sec. 16. Signs: Charges Limited To Those on Signn.
(a) Every restricted access parking lot licensee shall maintain
information signs in the parking lot as required by this section.
(b) There shall be a sign at each entrance to the parking lot,
located not further into the parking lot than the point at which access
to the parking lot is restricted. Each such sign shall show the name and
4
telephone number of the licensee, the license number under which the
parking lot is operating, and if charges are made, the rates charged for
parking or storing motor vehicles on said parking lot. Such signs shall
state the minimum rate, the maximum rate for 12 hours and the
maximum rate for 24 hours, and if there are no maximum rates, the
sign shall so state. Such signs shall also state all special rates, including
any weekly or monthly rates. No change in the posted rates shall be
effective until notice of such change has been given not less than 24
hours prior to the effective time of the change by posting the same on
the parking lot entrance signs using letters and numbers at least equal
in size to the other letters and numbers on such sign. Such signs shall
not exceed two feet by three feet, shall be permanently mounted with a
minimum distance to the bottom of the sign of three feet, and a
maximum distance to the bottom of the sign of five feet, and shall
conform to all City codes, ordinances and regulations regarding
erection and construction. Layout of sign graphics shall be approved by
the Director including color, size of lettering, placement of information
and identification symbols. In no case shall any letters or numerals be
less than two inches in height.
(c) No sign graphics of any type shall be attached to or displayed
on any attendant building except that a sign may be attached or
incorporated into the building design which specifies the hours of
attendant duty, the location of keys after attendant hours, the name,
phone number and license number of the licensee, and any other
information essential to the normal operation of the lot.
(d) All restricted access parking lots which engage in towing of
unauthorized motor vehicles shall post such practice on a sign at each
lot entrance. In addition, each such sign shall include the name and
telephone number of the tower used. Letters on such signs shall be a
least one (1) inch in height. Such signs shall not exceed one foot by two
feet, and shall be located on the same support or supports as the
entrance sign required by subsection (b) of this section, but below such
entrance sign.
(e) No restricted access parking lot licensee shall charge, or allow
to be charged, any greater sum for parking a motor vehicle than is
stated on the entrance signs.
(f) All signs shall be kept in good condition and state of repair at
all times.
5
Sec. 17. Free Access to Building.
(a) Each restricted access parking lot shall provide at least one
driveway through the parking lot (which may be one -way) giving
access to the building or buildings served by the parking lot, with an
entrance to and exit from the driveway directly to a public street, so that
persons can be dropped off and picked up at such building or buildings,
at any time, without a claim check and without going through a motor
vehicle- reservoir area. However, if, in the opinion of the Director,
such a driveway is not feasible, or will be unsafe and therefore is not
provided for in the parking lot, then the provisions of subsection (b) of
this section shall apply.
(b) No licensee shall charge, or allow to be charged, any parking
or other fee for any motor vehicle which leaves the restricted access
parking lot within fifteen (15) minutes of the time of entry of such
vehicle into such parking lot as shown on the ;claim check issued to
such vehicle.
Sec. 18. Alterations. No restricted access parking lot licensee shall
make, or allow to be made, any alterations or modifications in the parking lot which
varies from the plot plans approved by the Director pursuant to this ordinance for
that restricted access parking lot, without prior written approval of the Director.
Sec. 19. Unauthorized Use of Vehicles. No personnel of a restricted
access parking lot shall use or permit the use, for any purpose whatsoever, of any
motor vehicles left in such lot for parking unless authorized in writing by the
owner or person in charge of such vehicle.
Sec. 20. Transferring Vehicle to Another Lot. No restricted access
parking lot personnel shall transfer any motor vehicle to another parking lot
without the consent of the owner or person in charge of said vehicle unless such
vehicle is in such lot without permission or payment.
Sec. 21. Prohibited Acts. The licensee of a restricted access parking lot
shall not permit the repairing (except in an emergency), dismantling or wrecking of
any motor vehicle, or the storage of any inoperable vehicles (as defined in
Ordinance No. 1031 of the City) on the parking lot.
Sec. 22. Retroactive Effect. It is intended that this ordinance be
effective retroactively: Therefore, any parking lot which is a restricted access parking
lot on the effective date of this ordinance, within 120 days of the effective date of this
Cj
ordinance, shall obtain a license under this ordinance for such parking lot, or cease
operation as a restricted access parking lot.
Sec. 23. Penalty. Any person violating this ordinance shall be subject
to the penalties set forth in Ordinance No. 175 of the City. Such penalties may be
imposed in addition to penalties allowed by this ordinance.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its
passage and publication.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Published in the Edina Sun - Current on
ATTEST:
City Clerk
7
Mayor
A.
Wl. e
° REQUEST FOR
r PURCHASE
TO:
HRA
FROM:
GORDON L. HUGHES, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
VIA:
Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF
$5,000
DATE.
JUNE 4, 1990
AGENDA ITEM III . A.
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK CENTRUM -:MECHANICAL
Company
Amount of Quote or Bid
1.
BLAINE HEATING
�.
$ 104,542.00
2.
KUMAR MECHANICAL
2.
109,983.00
3.
GILBERT MECHANICAL
3.
112,779.00
4.
WENZEL MECHANICAL
4.
116,742.00
5.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
BLAINE HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING - $104,542.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This bid is for Centennial Lakes Park Centrum mechanical
work. Award to low bidder is recommended.
Department
The Recommended bid'is e-
within budget not with
X b_L get ohq*A111n, Finar{ a Director
Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
REQ
o„ UEST FOR PURCHASE
=
TO: HRA
FROM: GORDON L. HUGHES, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager .
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00
DATE JUNE 4, 1990
AGENDA ITEM I I.I . B .
ITEM DESCRIPTION: CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK
CENTRUM -
ELECTRICAL
Company
Amount of Quote or Bid
1.
GEBHART ELECTRIC
$ 85,000.00'
2 •
METRO ELECTRICAL
2.
$ 87, 950.00
3•
PHASOR
3.
$ 95,830.00
4.
BLAIN HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING
4.
$ 96,800.00
5.
HIGHLIGHT ELECTRIC
5•
$ 97,650.00
6.
MASTER ELECTRIC
$ 98,872.00
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR END:
ME TRO ELECTRIC - $ 87,950.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This bid is for the Centennial Lakes Park Centrum electrical
work. We recommend award to Metro Electrical. The apparent
low bid of Gebhart.did not comply with project specifications.
Department ,
The Recommended bid is
within budget , not withioudge
Kenneth Rosland City
Director
A
�`� �\' REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: HRA
FROM: GORDON HUGHES
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00
DATE: JUNE 4, 1990 AGENDA ITEM HRA III . C .
ITEM DESCRIPTION: CENTENNIAL LAKES MAINTENANCE ART-? A.- FIREPROOFING
Company. Amount of Quote or &d
�. BAHL INSULATION, INC. 1. S 13,120. 00
2. INTECC, INC. 2. 13, 635.00
3.. 3.
4. 4,
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
RECOMIEND AWARD TO LOW BIDDER - BAHL INSULATION - $13,120.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
THIS BID IS FOR SPRAY FIREPROOFING OF THE CENTENNIAL LAKES
MAINTENANCE AREA AND IS IN THE BUDGETED AMOUNT FOR THE
MAINTENANCE BUILDING.
Signature Departmen
The Recommended bid is
x_
within budget not withiyr bu et n ftllln, Finaice Director
Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
,kt,nRwu,,,9•
TO: HRA
FROM: GORDON L. HUGHES,-ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
-
SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000
HRA /COUNCIL
DATE: JUNE 4, 1990
AGENDA ITEM' III • D
ITEM DESCRIPTION: 'CENTENNIAL LAKES MAINTE19ANCE AREA - ELECTRICAL WORK
'
Company
Amount of Quote or Bd
1•1 VANTAGE ELECTRIC
$ 8,850.00
2 • METRO ELECTRIC
2 •
$ 8, 950.00
3. HUNT ELECTRIC -
. 3.
. $ 9,080.00
4.
4.
5:
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR END:
VANTAGE - ELECTRIC
GENERAL INFORMATION:
THIS.BID IS FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE AND LIGHTING
FOR THE
CENTENNIAL LAKES MAINTENANCE BUILDING.
The Recommended bid is -x
within budget not wit�in bu et o allin,
Kenneth Rosland, City Manac
C.(_=—
Director
At
e Cn I
Q' REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
• �H G •
:do:aes
To: CITY COUNCIL
From: MAYOR RICHARDS
Date: JUNE 4, 1990
Subject: APPOINTMENT /REAPPOINTMENT
TO EAST EDINA HOUSING
FOUNDATION
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
HRA
IV.
Consent
❑
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends
To HRA
0
To Council
Action
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Reappoint the following individuals to the East Edina Housing Foundation
Board of Directors: Virginia B. Shaw, Ronald L. Ringling, William F.
Greer, Robert Q. Schoening. Appoint the following individual to the Board
of Directors, John M. Palmer.
Info /Background:
In addition to the above noted reappointments, I would like to appoint John
M. Palmer, of 5813 Eastview Drive to the Board of Directors of the East
Edina Housing Foundation. I believe Mr. Palmer is well known to all of
you. He is a partner in the law firm of Fredrickson & Byron. He is
presently a member of the Community Development and Planning Commission.
o e,
• r�CORroRp�Y •
1880
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, Edina Kids Club is celebrating ten years of before and after - school
child care to the children of Edina; and
WHEREAS, Edina Kids Club has grown from a staff of five serving 50 children to
a staff of 40 serving 500 children; and
WHEREAS, Edina Kids Club's Stated Mission is to provide highest quality,
affordable care-and enrichment programs to Edina's school -age children; and
WHEREAS, Edina Kids Club was the first school- age.child Care program in
Minnesota to be accredited by the National Academy of Early Childhood
Programs; and _
WHEREAS, Edina Kids Club is a pioneer in the development of extended day
enrichment programs, including RALLY, Prime Time and Kinder Play; and
WHEREAS, Edina Kids Club is served by Director Linda Sisson who is listed as
one of five leading authorities on school -age child care by the National
Association for the Education of Young Children; and
WHEREAS, Edina Kids Club is served by a Parent Advisory Council that has been
cited by the Minnesota Department of Education as an outstanding example of
effective parent involvement in policy development and program evaluation; and
WHEREAS, Edina Kids Club is a safe, happy, enriching environment where
children have fun.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Frederick S. Richards, Mayor of the City of Edina, do
hereby proclaim June 14, 1990, as
KIDS CLUB'S 10TH ANNIVERSARY
in the City of Edina.
MAYOR
CONSENT ITEM
LOCATION MAP II. A. 1.
LOT DIVISION
NUMBER LD -90 -6
L O C A T 10 N 6404 -6406 McCauley Circle
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
(;
DRAFT MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 30, 1990.
LD -90 -6 6404 -6406 McCauley Circle. Mellos Zivkovich
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the proponent is requesting a party wall
division of an existing double bungalow. The division complies with all Zoning
Ordinance requirements for a party wall division.
Mr. Larsen recommended approval
Commissioner Runyan moved to recommend approval. Commissioner Palmer seconded
the motion. All voted aye. Motion carried.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
MAY 30, 1990
LD -90 -6 6404 -6406 McCauley Circle. Mellos Zivkovich
The request is a party wall division of an existing double bungalow. The
division complies with all Zoning Ordinance requirements for a party wall
division.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval.
0
P ^Oa
n o�
� •� Fy
' - }� 7�72'N�J •3
N �
�'S 9SP6 -er�y Z
IP
5 v1
o
x'14
r ,,� �4 b �`� • h�
z ,�5 4 0
�h
/ %4
}oa.�yf ;�.ii/ -,y-/ . a/6ap
00=fS 'f /�� /s�nsy /nos mot// }o •f /��fse�y�uoa a5/71 uo ��6u� �y6 /u e= 0(2- po�nr��c� sP
°
/
bf/��J�O »�' `/✓O/1 /4cfy aa•£ S1 HJ /9f/ `/VO /t %OOy c�z/�' S1 H9 /� // /t �7n HJ °Gy �/ �'0O/8
'Z X07 �Z X07 }° 1--Y OOSS �' /ur�s�My� nos a5/1
d 7 -V.221 d
07'
ENO,1z as V yJ /--VJ•/ /97/7 V2 W �l �l�Ole 7
6EtSS "Gj/ `rr.iP9 ` a /oi.J /%ynsJ aW �Ot'9 ss�u�PF/
V.7//1 O XNZ 7 VW 1o3
Jwu!Bu3 I!MD
OMr
joAaunS purl
A S 1 0 303 I J I 1 N9SNVH
'f AOM
/,
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land:
Lot 2, Block 1, MC CAULEY HEIGHTS 3RD ADDITION, according to the recorded
plat thereof; and
WHEREAS, the owner has requested the subdivision of said tract into separate
parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows:
Parcel A - The southwesterly 55.00 feet of Lot 2, Block 1, MC CAULEY HEIGHTS
3RD ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, as measured at a right
angle from the southwesterly line thereof.
Parcel B - That part of Lot 2, Block 1, MC CAULEY HEIGHTS 3RD ADDITION,
according to the recorded plat thereof, lying northeasterly of the
southwesterly 55.00 feet thereof, as measured at a right angle from the
southwesterly line thereof.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said
Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the
Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance
Nos. 804 and 825;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is'
hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 804 and
Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof
as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any
other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further
subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent
ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may
be provided for by those ordinances.
ADOPTED this 4th day of June, 1990.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do
hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a correct and true
copy of the resolution duly adopted by the Edina,City Council at its Regular
Meeting of June 4, 1990 and as recorded in the minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 7th day of May, 1990.
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
CONSENT ITEM
LOCATIO14 MAP II. A. 2,
LOT DIVISION
N U M-B E R LD -90 -7
LOCATION 5144 Valley View Road, 6149 Code Avenue
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
i
DRAFT MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON MAY 30, 1990.
LD -90 -7 5144 Valley View Road
6149 Code Avenue
Mr. Larsen told the Commission the proponent proposes a lot division that would
transfer the rear portion of 5144 Valley View Road to 6149 Code Avenue. Both
properties will remain conforming following the division.
Mr. Larsen recommend approval.
Commissioner Hale moved to recommend approval. Commissioner Palmer seconded the
motion. All voted aye. Motion carried.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
MAY 30, 1990
LD -90 -7 5144 Valley View Road and 6149 Code Avenue
The proposed lot division would transfer the rear portion of the lot at 5144
Valley View Road to 6149 Code Avenue. Both properties will remain conforming
following the division.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval.
Is
4l
7
Q
I
U
N
N
scale 1"•30'
inp..wma.nwwa•�aawer..a shove described prnpprty
�+ww�Co.+r. r..�.ar re a u. bom� a r a•Wq. •�rsn..ns r�
.a rne. 8urw•N• a w� nr 1
05th
s
CARDARELLE 8 ASSOCIATES, INC.
STATE REG. NO. 6508
%./irlUHr CLLC & AJSUUTA I ES, Inc.
941 -3031
Land Surveyors
Eden Prairie, MN 5534•
Survey For Georae Selcke Book-,ML Paged File
6149-Code Avenue
Edina 55436
La
569 °33, 40 fence
441
lin
F o
t WIO
+ O r, fl p N # 12 3 "rl
i ! 0 Drive N n
N
.n
Lot 3, Block 1, Stringer's Addition and
Block 1, Patten Addition lying North of
point on the West line 50.80 feet South
corner-of said Lot 3, Block 1, Patten At
the East line of Lot 3, Block 1, Patten
South of the-Northeast corner of Lot 3,
Addition and there terminating.
that part of Lot 3,
a line running from a
of the Northwest
°_dition to a point on
Addition 65.0 feet
Block 1, Patten
VC
Scale 1 " =30�
na■eyanh"Mttw ■■Irw&WCWfWr■W060r MdauwwydttrbowW■rwbt above described pro ert.
Wnrrp,n Ca+enr. Minn■■ou and W the locator w ■II ouddl ttwwn..ro all
r.br.�c+barrnwn.. any horn or an 6" taro. Sur 00a by m■ m■ 16th .w d Ma
CA DAREl 1-9YAASS OCIATES, INC.
STATE REG. NO. 6508
CARDARELLE & ASSOCIATES, Inc.
941 -3031
Land Surveyors
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
.der of ira to *UrD
Survey For n Book 3p1 Page (,c File
(I 4 q
Co c
Lot 3, Block 1, Patten
Addition except that part
lying North of a line run-
ning from a point on the
West line 50.80 feet South
of the Northwest corner
of said Lot 3, Block 1,
Patten Addition to a
point on the East line
of Lot 3, Block 1, Patten
Addition 65.0 feet South
of the Northeast corner
of Lot 3, Block 1, Patten
Addition and there
terminating.
ci
0
W
r
n
Z4.0
.W
Drive.
#5 144
N
scale, l " *30'
�h@M Wmnhth+ e».■ true am— rew..wwwat..urv"of mwdr..a above d -scr'hpd pr°pimrty
►11111111" Camey. MMMM nw d the WC&M m of all b d1hrm MWWn. aw all
•able « immch w+ett. / from o on aid WM. Surwr.0 A M mr elera 1- 6th dW d
GARDARELLE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
STATE REG. NO. 6508
a
�o
Z4.0
.W
Drive.
#5 144
N
scale, l " *30'
�h@M Wmnhth+ e».■ true am— rew..wwwat..urv"of mwdr..a above d -scr'hpd pr°pimrty
►11111111" Camey. MMMM nw d the WC&M m of all b d1hrm MWWn. aw all
•able « immch w+ett. / from o on aid WM. Surwr.0 A M mr elera 1- 6th dW d
GARDARELLE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
STATE REG. NO. 6508
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute various separate
parcels:
Lot 3, Block 1, PATTEN ADDITION, and
Lot 3, Block 1, STRINGER'S ADDITION
WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to combine said tracts into
the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "Parcels "):
Lot 3, Block 1, PATTEN ADDITION except that part lying North of a line
running from a point on the West line 50.80 feet South of the Northwest
corner of said Lot 3, Block 1, PATTEN ADDITION to a point on the East line of
Lot 3, Block 1, PATTEN ADDITION 65.0 feet South of the Northeast corner of
Lot 3, Block 1, PATTEN ADDITION and there terminating.
Lot 3, Block 1, STRINGER'S ADDITION and that part of Lot 3, Block 1, PATTEN
ADDITION lying North of a line running from a,point on the West line 50.80
feet South of the Northwest corner of said Lot 3, Block 1, PATTEN ADDITION to
a point on the East line of Lot 3, Block 1, PATTEN ADDITION 65.0 feet South
of the Northeast corner of Lot 3, Block 1, PATTEN ADDITION and there
terminating.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and
Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and
said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the
Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance
Nos. 804 and 825;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is
hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 804 and
Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof
as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any
other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further
subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent
ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may
be provided for by those ordinances.
ADOPTED this 4th day of June, 1990.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
, 0 �1 ;7111�[N\I�1�il��fllY��]11�iN:1
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do
hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a correct and true
copy of the resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular
Meeting of June 4, 1990 and as recorded in the minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 7th day of May, 1990.
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
0',
,
e
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
r
To:
KENNETH ROSLAND
Agenda Item #
II .
C. 2.
From:
CRAIG LARSEN
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Date:
JUNE 4, 1990
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
LICENSE FEES FOR
[�
To Council
RESTRICTED ACCESS
PARKING LOTS
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution °
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Adoption of Ordinance Amendment
INFO /BACKGROUND
Staff feels the recommended fee will, on average, cover our costs.
ORDINANCE NO.-171-A33
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO'. 171
TO ADD LICENSE FEE FOR RESTRICTED ACCESS PARKING LOTS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Schedule A to Ordinance No. 171 is hereby amended by Adding the
following thereto:
ORD. SEC.
NO. NO. PURPOSE OF FEE /CHARGE
824 6 Restricted Access Parking
Lot License
AMOUNT
$500.00
Renewals:
0 -50 parking spaces $100.00
51 -100 parking spaces 150.00
101 -200 parking spaces 250.00
Over 200 parking spaces 400.00
FEE NO.
28a -1
28a -2
28a -3
28a -4
28a -5
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon
its passage and publication.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
ATTEST:
City clerk
Mayor
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM. Bob Kojetin, Director Parks and Recreation
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF
$500
DATE: May 2.9, 1990
AGENDA ITEM IV.B.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: 30 light fixtures and circuitry
-Company,
Amount of Quote or Bid
1. CSI-Electric, Inc.
.: $16,800.00
2. Electric Service Co. of Mpls., Inc.
2,'. $16,842.00
3. Ridgedale Electric, Inc.
3.. $18,300.00
4. Metro Electric Construction Co., Inc.
4. $19,116.00
5.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
CSI Electric, Inc. $16,800.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
30 ?i,ht fixtures and circuitry for Braemar Soccer /Football field.
The Recommended bid is
within budget not
Department
hirybu�t o VVallin, Fin ce Director
City Manager
,
rJ �� REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
may;
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director Park and Recreation Denartment
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager .
SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: May 30,-1990 AGENDA ITEM Iv. C
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Restroom remodeling, Braemar Arena
.-Company
Department
Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Engco .Construction
23,910
2. r,orcon Co. Inc.
2.
29,880'
3 • P:ikkelson -Wulff Co.
3.
31,049
4• Carlson.Lavine,
4.
31,110
5• ECI Bldg Contractors
5.
36,290
6. Frerichs Construction Co.
6.
43,200
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
ENGCO CONSTRUCITON $28,910.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Remodeling Braemar Arena.Restrooms to make
them handicap accessible.
CDBG Funds.
Signatdre
The Recommended bid is X
within budget not.
Director
Kenneth. Rosland City
4
Department
.
Director
Kenneth. Rosland City
4
° 2 ' �'' REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
H .�, °
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM:. Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE 4 June, 1990
AGENDA ITEM IV. D.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Southdale Water Tower Cleaning
Company Amount of Quote or &d
1. H & H Watertower, Inc. 1. $ 8,200.00
2. Rainbow, Inc. 2. $ 12,112:00
3. Abhe & Svoboda, Inc. 3, $ 12,500.00
4.. 4
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
H & H Watertower, Inc. $ 8,200.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This is a maintenance project on the Southdale water tower.
The contractor will clean the exterior of the bowl, and thus
allow more time prior to needing a total re- painting. We did,
a similar project on the Gleason Road tower two years ago.
The funds for the project are from the Utility Fund.
signatur
The Recommended bid is
wnnm budget
-4A.
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor Richards and City. Council.
FROM:• Bob Kojetin, Director
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: tray 31., .1990
AGENDA ITEM IV. E
.ITEM DESCRIPTION: Area lighting around Braemar.Clubhouse.
_Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Ridgedale Electric', Inc. 1 $11,100.00
2• Metro-Electric-Construction Co., Inc. 2, $14,173.00
3• Electric Service Co. of Mpls., Inc. 3, $16,354.00
4. 4.
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Ridgedald Electric, Inc. X11,100.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Bollard lights around pathways of.the Braemar clubhouse.
r /J
Sign re
The Recommended bid is
within budget not
i
I/ A
Departmen
Wallin,
Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
e�
Director
A.
o
\,N�bHroMti��/
iaaa
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
From: KENNETH ROSLAND
CITY MANAGER
Date: JUNE 4, 1990
Subject:
LOCAL 49 IUOE CONTRACT
(Public Works)
Agenda Item #
V. A.
Consent
0
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
❑
To Council
Action
0
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Motion to approve the proposed changes to Local 49 IUOE (Public Works)
Contract.
Info /Background:
1. Wages - 4% increase
2. Insurance— Increase City contribution $10.00 /month
3. Overtime - When an employee exceeds 14 hours of continuous service,
all hours in excess of 14 hours will be paid twice the regular rate
of pay.
4. Vacation - Adopt the language from the new Personnel Ordinance.
5. Severance Pay - Adopt the language from the new Personnel Ordinance.
6. Uniforms - Increase the number of uniforms to 11 biweekly.
This is within the Council budgeted amount.
A.
• iN�gdro� tip •
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To :. MAYOR AND COUNCIL
From: KENNETH ROSLAND
CITY MANAGER
Date: JUNE 4, 1990
Subject:
LOCAL 320 TEAMSTERS
1990 CONTRACT
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
v • B
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
❑
To Council
Action
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Motion to approve the proposed changes in the 1990 Police
Contract (Local 320 Teamsters).
Info /Background:
The proposed changes are as follows:
1. Wages - 4% increase
2. Insurance - City contribution increased $10.00 /month.
This is within the Council budgeted amount.
Cn
O
ro
S
1666
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER
Agenda Item #
v • c
From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK'
Consent
0
Information Only
❑
Date: MAY 30, 1990
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject: CHANGE OF POLLING
a
To Council
LOCATION FOR PRECINCT .17
Action
❑Motion
Fx�
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation: Adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the
polling place for Precinct 17 in the City of Edina be changed from 7151 York
Avenue South to Lutheran Church of the Master, 7128 France Avenue South.
Info /Background:
Voters in Precinct No. 17 were voting at the former location of the Senior Center
at 7151 York Avenue South. That facility is no longer available for elections.
I have contacted Lutheran Church of the Master and have obtained permission to
use their facility for elections. I would recommend that the Council approve
Lutheran Church of the Master, 7128 France Avenue South, as the polling place
for Precinct No. 17.
R
1
r�
I
FVT
Vq
T
e
§t!_�H lose �
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Ken Rosland, Manager
From: Marcella Daehn, Clerk
Date: June 1, 1990
Subject: On -Sale Wine License and
On -Sale Beer License for
Q.Cumbers Restaurant,
7465 France Avenue So.
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
V.D
Consent
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
To Council
Action
'❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
F
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Approval of issuance of an On -Sale Wine License and On -Sale Beer License to
Q.Cumbers Restaurant at 7465 France Avenue South.
Info /Background:
The City has received applications for both an On -Sale Wine License and an
On -Sale Beer License from Q.Cumbers Restaurant located at 7465 France Avenue
South (Centennial Lakes), together with applications for four Manager's Licenses.
The applications have been reviewed by the Police, Health and Planning Departments
and the necessary investigations have been conducted. Memorandums are attached
from these departments in support of issuance of the On -Sale Wine License.
The departments have also approved issuance of the beer license.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Kenneth E..Rosland
FROM: Craig G. Swanson
SUBJECT: On -Sale Wine License
DATE: May 24, 1990
The on -sale wine license application of the below - listed
establishment has been investigated in accordance with applicable
statutes and ordinances:
Q. Cumbers
7465 France Ave. S.
Edina, MN 55435
The findings of this investigation do not reveal information that
is contrary to the public interest for the purpose of licensing.
Therefore, I recommend the Council move to approve the
application and issuance of an on -sale wine license for the
establishment conditioned upon approval by the State of
Minnesota; and instruct the City Clerk to forward the required
documents to the State of Minnesota for their approval.
CRAIG SWANSON
CHIE OF POLICE
CGS:nah
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Kenneth Rosland
FROM: Elliott Marston
SUBJECT: On -Sale Wine Licnese Application
DATE: June 4, 1990
The on -sale wine license application for Q.Cumbers Restaurant, 7465 France
Avenue South, Edina, MN. has been reviewed by the Health Department.
Our investigation of the premises finds that the subject restaurant complies
with the requirements of Ordinance No. 902 with respect to seating capacity,
food establishment license and appropriate. storage and food handling space
which is not adversely impacted by the storage and service of wine.
I would recommend that the on -sale wine license be approved.
�i
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Kenneth E. Rosland
FROM: Philip S. Dommer
SUBJECT: On Sale Wine License Application
DATE: June 4, 1990
The on -sale wine license application for Q.Cumbers Restaurant, 7465 France
Avenue South, Edina, MN. has been reviewed by the Planning Department.
The premises meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and I would recommend
approval of the license application.
Cr
e tit
104 ch
�
lose •
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER
From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK
Date: JUNE 1, 1990
Subject :WINE LICENSE RENEWALS
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
v • E
Consent
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
0
To Council
Action
0
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Approval of wine license renewals for Empress Restaurant, Original Pancake
House and Szechuan Star Restaurant, as recommended by the Police Department.
Info /Background:
Attached are copies of the reports for the above wine license renewals from
the Police Department.
City of Edina
Police Department
On -Sale Wine License Renewal
Investigative Report
May 31, 1990
The Empress Restaurant was inspected for the purpose of
compliance with the wine license ordinance and renewal of their
wine license. This inspection included:
1.. Updated criminal checks.
No convictions that affect management of the license were
found.
2. Review of complaints and police response.
A review of police response to calls for service does not
indicate any irregularities in regard to licensing.
3. On -site inspection and review.
An unannounced inspection on May 20, 1990, at 1900 hrs.
revealed the following: no violations. .
Based upon the above findings, license renewal is recommended.
C ;S
CRAIG SWANSON
CHIEF OF POLICE
CGS:nah
, i.
City of Edina
Police Department
On -Sale Wine License Renewal
Investigative Report
May 31, 1990
The Original Pancake House /My Pie Restaurant was inspected for
the purpose of compliance with the wine license ordinance and
renewal of their wine license. This inspection included:
1. Updated criminal checks.
No convictions that affect management of the license were
found.
2. Review of complaints and police response.
A review of police response to calls for service does not
indicate any irregularities in regard to licensing.
3. On -site inspection and review.
An unannounced inspection on May 20, 1990, at 1900 hrs.
revealed the following: no violations.
Based upon the above findings, license renewal is recommended.
CRAIG G SWANSON
CHIEF POLICE
CGS:nah
J
City of Edina
Police Department
On -Sale Wine License Renewal
Investigative Report
May 31, 1990
The Szechuan Star Restaurant was inspected for the purpose of
compliance with the wine license ordinance and renewal of their
wine license. This inspection included:
1. Updated criminal checks.
No convictions that affect management of the license were
found.
2. Review of complaints and police response.
A review of police response to calls for service does not
indicate any irregularities in regard to licensing.
3. On -site inspection and review.
An unannounced inspection on May 20, 1990, at 1900 hrs.'
revealed 'the following: no violations.
Based upon the above findings, license renewal is recommended.
CRAIG G SWANSON
CHIEF OF POLICE
CGS:nah
0
o(le
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER
Agenda Item #
y.F
From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK
Consent
Information Only
❑
Date: JUNE 1, 1990
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject: CLUB LIQUOR LICENSE AND
To Council
SUNDAY LIQUOR LICENSE
RENEWALS
Action
0
Motion
❑
Resolution
i
❑
Ordinance
'
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Approval of Liquor License Renewals for Edina Country Club and Interlachen
Country Club.
0
Info /Background:
Applications for renewal of the liquor licensesfor Edina Country Club and
Interlachen Country Club have been received and reviewed by the Police
Department. Copies of the Department's reports are attached.
Staff recommends approval of the club liquor and Sunday liquor license
renewals.
r'
City of Edina
Police Department
Private Club Liquor License Renewal
Investigative Report
Edina Country Club
June 1, 1990
The application for renewal of the liquor license for the Edina
Country Club has been received and reviewed by the Police
Department.
The licensees are operating within the applicable statutes and
ordinances.
Record checks have been performed on the principals for criminal
activity and they have been found to be clear at this time.
A review of police response to calls for service did not reveal
any irregularities in regard to licensing.
Based upon the above findings, license renewal is recommended.
G
r
CRAIG
SWANSON
CHIEF
F POLICE
CGS:nah
City of Edina
Police Department
Private Club Liquor License Renewal
Investigative Report
Interlachen Country Club
June 1, 1990
The application for renewal of the liquor license for the
Interlachen Country Club has been received and reviewed by the
Police Department.
The licensees are operating within the applicable statutes. and
ordinances.
Record checks have been performed on the principals for-criminal
activity and they have been found to be clear at this time.
A review of police response to calls for service did not reveal
any irregularities in regard to licensing.
.Based upon the above findings, license renewal is recommended.
�GS
CR7AIG. SWANSON
CHPOLICE
CGS:nah
A.
o e ,
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: MANAGER AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item #
VI.A:
From: RALPH CAMPBELL
Consent
❑
Information Only
7
Date: JUNE 4, 1990
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
❑
To Council
COMMUNITY INFORMATION
Action
❑
Motion
SEMINAR
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Info /Background:
The Fall 1990 joint City - School- Chamber of Commerce'community
information seminar has been tentatively scheduled for
September 18, 1990.
AMOUNT
307.92
307.92
59.35
59.35 *
22.90
22.90 *
75.00
75.00 *
110.65
151.00
261.65 *
21.00-
21.00
.00 *
180.00
150.00
330.00 *
750.75
750.75 *
183.96
183.96
10.00
10.00 *
100.00
100.00 *
39.48
39.48 *
495.00
435.00
930.00 *
40.00
40.00 *
209.97
10.00
45.00
264.97 *
11.377.00
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
BRAYTON CHEMICALS CHEMICALS
GARDNER HARDWARE
EDUCATIONAL SYST
CITY OF MPLS
DON ENGER
DON ENGER
COMMISSIONER OF
COMMISSIONER OF
BUREAU OF'CRIMINAL
BUREAU OF CRIMINAL
DCA INC
MPLS SPOKESMAN
M G I A
CITY OF FARIBAULT
EST E PETERSON
JACKSON LSCAPE SUP
JACKSON LSCAPE SUP
MN CITY MANAGEMENT
ROGER OLWIN
ROGER OLWIN
ROGER OLWIN
RATHERT CHEV
06 -04 -90 PAGE 1
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
27- 4564 - 664 -66 216729 5930
RUBBER HOSE
1074540- 540 -54
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
155704
05/22/90
* * * * **
155706
05/22/90
155707
05/22/90
155708
05/22/90
155709
05/22/90
155709
05/22/90
155710
05/25/90
155710
05/22/90
155711
05/22/90
155711
05/22/90
155712
05/22/90
* * * * **
155714
05/22/90
155715
05/22/90
155716
05/22/90
155717
05/22/90
155718
05/22/90
155718
05/22/90
" 155719
05/22/90
155720
05/22/90
155720
05/22/90
155720
05/22/90
155721
05/29/90
AMOUNT
307.92
307.92
59.35
59.35 *
22.90
22.90 *
75.00
75.00 *
110.65
151.00
261.65 *
21.00-
21.00
.00 *
180.00
150.00
330.00 *
750.75
750.75 *
183.96
183.96
10.00
10.00 *
100.00
100.00 *
39.48
39.48 *
495.00
435.00
930.00 *
40.00
40.00 *
209.97
10.00
45.00
264.97 *
11.377.00
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
BRAYTON CHEMICALS CHEMICALS
GARDNER HARDWARE
EDUCATIONAL SYST
CITY OF MPLS
DON ENGER
DON ENGER
COMMISSIONER OF
COMMISSIONER OF
BUREAU OF'CRIMINAL
BUREAU OF CRIMINAL
DCA INC
MPLS SPOKESMAN
M G I A
CITY OF FARIBAULT
EST E PETERSON
JACKSON LSCAPE SUP
JACKSON LSCAPE SUP
MN CITY MANAGEMENT
ROGER OLWIN
ROGER OLWIN
ROGER OLWIN
RATHERT CHEV
06 -04 -90 PAGE 1
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
27- 4564 - 664 -66 216729 5930
RUBBER HOSE
1074540- 540 -54
5970 7357
TEMPLATE
10- 4504 - 510-51
65401 7630
SCHOOL
10- 4202 - 420 -42
REINBURSEMENT
10- 4201 - 500 -50
CLOTHING ALLOWNACE
10- 4266 - 420 -42
LICENSE
10- 4204 - 420 -42
LICENSE
10- 4204 - 420 -42
TELETYPE SERVICE
10- 4268 - 420 -42
TELETYPE SERVICE
10- 4268 - 420 -42
FLEX ADMIN COST
10- 4156 - 510 -51
38983
ADVERTISING
10- 4212- 510 -51
DUES / ENGER
10- 4204 - 420 -42
DUES
10- 4204 - 140 -14
4121
REFUND
40- 3800 - 000 -00
ROCK
27- 4522 - 664 -66
7454
BLACK DIRT
27- 4562- 664 -66
1009 7101
DUES
10- 4204 - 140 -14
UNIFORM - ALLOWANCE
10 -4266- 420 -42
REIMBURSEMENT
10- 4504 - 420 -42
PHOTO SUPPLIES
10- 4508 - 420 -42
CAR
10- 4901 - 200 -20
50516 6132
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
HECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
55721
05/22/90
66,462.75
RATHERT CHEV
EQUIPMENT REPLACE
55721
05/29/90
11,377.00
RATHERT CHEV
CAR
89,216.75
*
55722
05/22/90
390.00
TIPS
SERVICE CONTRACT
390.00
*
5.5723
05/22/90
326.00
FILTRA TECH SYSTEM
SAND SEPARATOR
326.00
*
55724
05/29/90
790.15
METRO ELECTRIC
ELECTRIC WORK
790.15
*
55725
05/22/90
844.44
RON LUND
SERVICES
844.44
*
55726
05/22/90
50.00
BLAKE SCHOOL
REFUND
k k k k k
50.00
*
55728
05/29/90
659.34
JOANNA L FOOTE
CONTRACT EMPLOYEE
55728
05/29/90
659.34-
JOANNA L FOOTE
CONTRACT EMPLOYEE
55728
05/29/90
659.34
JOANNA L FOOTE
CONTRACT EMPLOYEE
55728
05/22/90
732.60
JOANNA L FOOTE
TEMP EMPLOYMENT
55728
05/25/90
732.60-
JOANNA L FOOTE
TEMP EMPL
659.34
55729
05/22/90
158.11
DANIEL SMITH
COST /GOODS SOLD
158.11
55730
05/22/90
1,516.00
THOEN & ASSOC
PRO SERV
1,516.00
55731
05/22/90
177.00
N MEMORIAL MED CTR
SEMINAR
177.00
55732
05/22/90
1,148.00
GE MOBILE COMM
2 MOBILE RADIOS
1,148.00
55733
05/22/90
141.86
SEARS
TOOLS
55733
05/22/90
280.65
SEARS
TOOLS
55733
05/22/90
134.99
SEARS
TOOL CHEST
557.50
*
55734
05/22/90
110.00
F &M DISTRIBUTORS
REFUND
110.00
*
55735
05/22/90
285.00
IDELLES INTERIOR DES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
285.00
*
55736
05/22/90
8.50
ACTION MESSENGER INC
CONTRACT SERVICES
8.50
55737
05/22/90
173.94
DARNELL CORP B /R200
SUBSCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. IN'
10- 4901 - 420 -42
10- 4901- 490 -49
30- 4288 - 781 -78
40- 4504 - 801 -80
10- 4540 - 540 -54
10- 3220 - 000 -00
30- 3507 - 000 -00
s
06 -04 -90 PAGE 2
J. # P.O. # MESSAGE
5035
50517 6132
7720
8356 7343
12288 7594
12- 1420 - 434 -43 6940
12- 1420 - 434 -43 6940
12- 4120 - 434 -43 6940
12- 4120 - 434 -43 6939
12- 4120 - 434 -43 6939
23- 4624 - 613 -61 7300
30- 4201 - 781 -78 11688 7036
10- 4202 - 440 -44 7227
10- 4901 - 440 -44 7223
10- 4580 - 520 -52 7238
10- 4580 - 520 -52 7253
10- 4580 - 520 -52 7238
10- 3055 - 000 -00
30- 4504- 782 -78 20488 7787
30- 4288 - 781 -78 90104 7789
10- 4204 - 160 -16 369255
* * * -CKS
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
05/22/90
05/22/90
05/22/90
05/22/90
05/22/90
05/22/90
05/22/90
05/22/90
05/22/90
05/22/90
05/22/90
05/22/90
05/22/90
05/22/90
05/22/90
05/22/90
05/22/90
05/22/90
05/22/90
05/25/90
AMOUNT
173.94
219.18
219.18
93.10
93.10
20.00
20.00
22.50
22.50
701.50
923.38
1,624.88
95.00
95.00
66.52
66.52
410.38
31.11
441.49
75.00
75.00 *
117.00
117.00
117.00
351.00 *
5.80
5.80 *
34.60
34.60 *
150.00
150.00 *
393.12
4.59
397.71 *
290.00
290.00 *
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
MR /MRS T NIESDERER
CORPORATE REPORT
ASSO OF METRO
CAROL SONNICKSEN
INDECO
INDECO
DIANE KOOLE
RICHARD. HERKAL
HOWARD NORBACK
HOWARD NORBACK
JOAN MICKSON
YELLOW PAGES
YELLOW PAGES
YELLOW PAGES
EDINA REALTY CORP
WILLIAM ROTSAERT
INTERN CONFERENCE
FLORENCE NORBACK
FLORENCE NORBACK
INTER CONFERENCE OF
05/25/90 142.37 SCOTT KEES
SERVICES
FACT BOOK
AMM ANNUAL MEETING
DINNER MEETING
PRO SERVICES
PRO SERVICES
CONFERENCE
VOTING SERVICES
VOTING SERVICES
MILEAGE
PERFORMANCE 6 -76 -90
ADVERTISING
ADVERTISING
ADVERTISING
REFUND.
REFUND
DUES
ELECTION SERV
MILEAGE
CONFERENCE
REFUND
06-04 -90 PAGE 3
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
30- 4504 - 783 -78
10- 4502 - 140 -14
10- 4206 - 140 -14
10- 4206 - 100 -10
10- 4201- 500 -50
10- 4201 - 500 -50
10- 4202 - 200 -20
10- 4201 - 184 -18
10- 4201 - 184 -18
10- 4208- 184 -18
30- 4224 - 781 -78
50- 4214 - 822 -82
50- 4214 - 842 -84
50- 4214 - 862 -86
40- 3800 - 000 -00
40- 3800 - 000 -00
10- 4204 - 490 -49
10- 4201 - 184 -18
10- 4208 - 184 -18
10 -4202- 490 -49
10- 3038 - 000 -00
7786
* * * -CKS
r
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
06 -04
-90 PAGE 4
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
# MESSAGE
142.37
*
155756
05/25/90
250.00
TWIN CITIES READER
ADVERTISING
30- 4214 - 781 -78
250.00
*
155757
05/25/90
335.22
ANDERBERG LUND
PRTNTING
30- 4600 - 781 -78
155757
05/25/90
1,225.00
ANDERBERG LUND
PRINTING
30- 4600 - 781 -78
6359
1,560.22
*
155758
05/25/90
53.06
BAHLS MOTOR
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
140625
7536
53.06
*
155759
05/25/90
20.00
PATRICIA MALLAN
REFUND
10- 1145- 000 -00
20.00
*
1557.60
05/25/90
9,500.03
PROGRESSIVE
PAYMENT
60- 2040 - 000 -00
89 -13
9,500.03
*
155761
05/25/90
425.00
SPECTRUM SAFETY
FIRST AID
26- 4201 - 682 -68
425.00
*
155762
05/25/90
123.06
CARLSON LK STATE EQU
GASKET
10- 4540- 560 -56
P66831
7340
123.06
*
155763
05/25/90
35.00
MIDWEST LSCAPEING
SHRUBS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
21972
7648
155763
05/25/90
248.50
MIDWEST LSCAPEING
TREES /SHRUBS
10-4560- 644 -64
21973
7649•
283.50
*
155764
05/25/90
193.87
GRUBERS POWER EQUI
LAWN MOWER
10- 4580 - 641 -64
-
6853
193.87
*
155765
05/25/90
352.00
LYNDE COMPANY
DIAMOND DRY OUT
10- 4522 - 642 -64
47207
7732
352.00
*
155766
05/25/90
357.60
BECKER & ASSOC
REPAIR
28- 4248- 704 -70
12230
6970
357.60
*
155767
05/25/90
233.18
MPLS ZIP SORT CORP
PRINTING
23- 4606-616 -61
80537
7714
155767
05/25/90
42.00
MPLS ZIP SORT CORP
POSTAGE
25- 4802 - 611 -61
80537
7714
275.18
*
155768
05/25/90
150.15
PERFORMANCE COMPUTER
GENERAL.SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42
047654
7777
150.15
*
155769
05/25/90
330.00
STATE LAB OF HYGIENE
LAB TESTING
10- 4200 - 482 -48
23401
6783
330.00
*
155770
05/25/90
59.'65
ADRIANE BRUMFIELD
CRAFT SUPPLIES
23- 4588 - 611 -61
7710
59.65
*
155771
05/25/90
350.00
DARE OFFICER
CONT ED
10- 4202 - 420 -42
155771
05/25/90
350.00
DARE OFFICER
CONT ED
10- 4202 - 420 -42
700.00
*
155772
05/25/90
55.15
WAHL & WAHL INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42
032306
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
155773
155774
15577.5
155775
155776
155777
155778
155779
155780
155781
155782
155783
155783
155783
155784
155785
155786
155787
155788
155789
05/25/90
05/25/90
05/25/90
05/25/90
05/25/90
05/25/90
05/25/90
05j25/90
05/25/90
05/25/90
05/25/90
05/25/90
05/25/90
05/25/90
05/25/90
05/29/90
05/29/90
05/29/90
05/29/90
05/29/90
AMOUNT
55.15 *
242.00
242.00 *
30.00
30.00 *
56.00
134.20
190.20 *
290.00
290.00 *
40.00
40.00 *
32.90
32.90 *
184.00
184.00 *
8,000.00
8,000.00 *
215.94
215.94 *
11,775.00
11,775.00 *
125.00
12.50
12.50-
125.00 *
108.74
108.74 *
7,970.00
7,970.00 *
1,134.42
1,134.42 *
703.00
703.00 *
521.00
521.00 *
1,366.00
1,366.00 *
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ST CLOUD STATE
APCO INC.
Apse fpie
CHRIS OMODT
CHRIS OMODT
VAN METER & ASSOC
IAWP
DAK INDUSTRIES INC
MPLS HEALTH DEPT
PBCC 1
SAMNA CORP
ENGCO CONSTR
MICHAEL T HANSEN
MICHAEL T HANSEN
MICHAEL T HANSEN
NORTHERN
PLEHAL BLACKTOPPING
APRES INC
CONVEYORS
ROGERS BODY SHOP
BUSINESS MACHINE
CONT ED
DUES
CONT ED
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
SCHOOL
SCHOOL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PRO SERV
SERVICE CONTRACT
DATA PROCESS
CONSTRUCTION
ADEPT
ADEPT
ADEPT
SUPPLIES
BLACKTOPPING
GENERAL SUPPLIES
TRANS BELTING
BODY SHOP REPAIR
SERVICE CONTRACT
06 -04 -90 PAGE 5
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. N MESSAGE
10- 4202 - 420 -42
10- 4204 - 420 -42
10- 4202 - 420 -42
10- 4266 - 420 -42
10- 4202 - 420 -42
10- 4202 - 420 -42
10- 4504 - 420 -42
10- 4201 - 420 -42 6891
10- 4288 - 420 -42
10- 4233 - 420 -42 2305 6464
60 -1300- 005 -20 2234
10- 4201 - 490 -49 5764
10 -4201- 490 -49 5764
10- 4204 - 490 -49 5764
27- 4504 - 664 -66 373712 7618
60- 1300 - 005 -20 521 7133
30- 4504 - 783 -78 7392
10- 4620 - 560 -56 1429 7074
10- 4248 - 560 -56 7531
70- 4288 - 510 -51 3259 7793
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
155790
05/29/90
13,968.00
HASTINGS AUTO
14000 CHASSIS CAB
155790
05/29/90
13,968.00
HASTINGS AUTO
14000 CHASSIS CAB
155790
05/29/90
13,968.00-
HASTINGS AUTO
14000 CHASSIS CAB
155790
05/29/90
16,785.00
HASTINGS AUTO
TRUCK
30,753.00
*
155791
05/29/90
11,268.00
GROSSMAN CHEV
TRUCK
11,268.00
*
155792
05/29/90
91.50
VINCE COCKRIEL
REIMBURSEMENT
91.50
*
155793
05/29/90
15.00
RON CARLSON
LICENSE
15.00
*
155794
05/29/90
30.00
DICK PELINKA
LICENSE
30.00
155795
05/29/90
25.00
TRUDY HANUS
REFUND
25.00
155796
05/29/90
25.00
MARJORIE HANE
REFUND
25.00
STATE OF MN - CPV
PROGRAM
155797
05/29/90
315.00
fEem SERY
COOP PURCHASING
315.00
155798
05/29/90
906.00
MARGARET MCDOWELL
AC INSTRUCTOR
906.00
155799
05/29/90
156.00
CYD WICKER
AC INSTRUCTOR
156.00
155800
05/29/90
360.00
ADRIENNE WEINBERGER
AC INSTRUCTOR
360.00
1.55801
05/29/90
420.00
MONICA RUDQUIST
AC INSTRUCTOR
420.00
*
155802
05/29/90
384.00
DOROTHY ODLAND
AC INSTRUCTOR
384.00
*
155803
05/29/90
60.00'
DUANE BARNHART
AC INSTRUCTOR
60.00
*
155804
05/29/90
180.00
NICK LEGEROS
AC INSTRUCTOR
180.00
*
155805
05/29/90
104.00
PHYLLIS HAYWA
AC INSTRUCTOR
104.00
155806
05/29/90
240.00
MARGARET GUST
AC INSTRUCTOR
240.00
155807
05/29/90
540.00
JEAN GRAPP
AC INSTRUCTOR
4
06 -04 -90 PAGE
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4901 - 650 -64 12610 6138
10- 4901 - 650 -64 12610 6138
10- 4901 - 650 -64 12610 6138
40 -1335- 000 -00 12611 6191
10- 4901 - 305 -30 39462 6139
10- 4202 - 640 -64
40- 4310- 809 -80
40- 4310 - 809 -80
10- 3500 - 000 -00
10- 3500 - 000 -00
10- 4504 - 560 -56
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201- 611 -61
23- 4201- 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201- 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611-61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
6
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
155808
155809
155810
155811
155812
155812
k k k k k k
155814
155815
155816
155817
155818
155819
155820
155821
155822
155823
155823
155824
155825
05/29/90
05/29/90
05/29/90
05/29/90
05/29/90
05/29/90
AMOUNT
540.00
360.00
360.00
255.00
255.00
180.00
180.00
303.00
303.00
120.48-
120.48
.00
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
SUSAN FRAME .
BILL DIETRICHSON
BETSY BRYANT
TOBIE DICKER
CARPET KING
CARPET KING
AC INSTRUCTOR.
AC INSTRUCTOR
AC INSTRUCTOR
AC INSTRUCTOR
CARPET
CARPET
06 -04 -90 PAGE 7
ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P.O. # MESSAGE
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201- 611 -61
23- 4201- 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
27- 4540 - 667 -66 5971
27- 4540- 667 -66 5971
05/29/90
28.40
CORINNE E HUNT
AMBULANCE REFUND
10- 3180 - 000 -00
28.40
*
05/29/90
27.00
MARGARET THOMPSON
SEMINAR
10- 4208 - 160 -16
27.00
*
05/29/90
20.00
SCOTT BAULER
LICENSE FEE
10- 4248 - 520 -52
20.00
*
05/29/90
20.00
COURTNEY HEYDA
LICENSE FEE
10- 4248 - 520 -52
20.00
*
05/29/90
25.00
DEBRA RITCHIE
REFUND
10- 3500 - 000 -00
25.00
*
05/29/90
39.00
JUDY KRZYZEK
REFUND
10- 3500 - 000 -00
39.00
*
05/29/90
25.00
MARY WOODWARD
REFUND
10- 3500 - 000 -00
25.00
*
05/29/90
2,525.75
PHILIP J STERN
ARBITRATOR.FEE
10- 4201 - 140 -14
2,525.75
*
05/29/90
110.16
FRIDEN ALCATEL
SUPPLIES
10- 4226 - 510 -51
110.16
*
05/29/90
600.00
ROBERT A ELLER
CONSTRUCTION
27- 1300 - 004 -00
05/29/90
1,200.00
ROBERT A ELLER
CONSTRUCTION
27- 1300 - 004 -00
1,800.00
*
05/29/90
1,323.00
OUTSIDE SERSV INC
TREE REMOVAL.
10- 4248 - 644 -64
1,323.00
*
05/29/90
2,070.00
NSP
CONSTRUCTION
23- 1300 - 001 -00 71445
* *k -CKS
f
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
06 -04
-90
PAGE 8
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
#
MESSAGE
2,070.00
*
155826
05/29/90
19.53
BIRD TIME SYSTEMS
TIME CLOCK
27- 4516 - 661 -66
902295
7913
19.53
*
155827
05/29/90
188.02
IDENTIFICATION SERV
ID TAGS
27- 4504 - 661 -66
7488
188.02
*
155828
05/29/90
85.16
BAG BOY
PARTS
27- 4540 - 666 -66
91787
7912
85.16
*
155829
05/29/90
1,646.14
PERKINS LSCAPE CONTR
CONSTRUCTION
60- 1300 - 016 -20
7134
1,646.14
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
155A09
05/25/90
863.58
AAA
VEHICLE REGISTRATION
10- 4310 - 560 -56
155A09
05/22/90
701.58
AAA
AUTO EXPENSES
10- 4310 - 560 -56
155A09
05/25/90
708.12
AAA
REGISTRATION
10- 4310 - 560 -56
155A09
05/25/90
5.50
AAA
TITLE
10- 4310 - 560 -56
2,278.78
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
* * * * **
2,925.99
* ** -CKS
155A21
05/22/90
185.50
ADT SECURITY SYS.
ALARM SERVICE
30- 4304 - 782 -78
605994
7787
185.50
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
155A24
05/22/90
369.45
AIR HYDRAULIC SYSTEM
COUPLING
10- 4620 - 560 -56
7450
369.45
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
155A31
05/22/90
7.06
AIRSIGNAL
UNIFORMS
10- 4266 - 430 -42
7.06
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
155A34
05/25/90
220.80
ALLIED PLASTICS
PLASTIC
10- 4540 - 560 -56
764
7658
220.80
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
155A39
05/25/90
233.44
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 301 -30
7018
7666
155A39
05/25/90
169.14
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 325 -30
7016
7537
155A39
05/22/90
128.16
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
BATTERY
10- 4504 - 440 -44
7011 -7471
155A39
05/22/90
176.18
- ALTERNATOR REBUILD
PRESSURE GUAGE
10- 4504 - 560 -56
7013
7515
155A39
05/25/90
11.84
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
7017
7587
155A39
05/22/90
23.10
ALTERNATOR.REBUILD
THERMOMETER
10- 4620 - 560 -56
7015
7144
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
MEAT
AM LASER CUT GRAFIX
GENERAL SUPPLIES
741.86
*
155A40
05/25/90
539.05
TELEPHONE
AIM ELECTRONICS
SCOREBOARD INSTAL
539.05
*
155A41
05/29/90
348.45
LAUNDRY
BACH -BILL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
348.45
*
* k k k k R
OFFICE SUPPLIES
BADGER METER INC
H2O METERS
.155A43
05/22/90
338.98
338.98
*
�5
05/25/90
2,025.00
155A45.
05/25/90
725.00
2,750.00* 725.00 -
k k k k k k
155A53
05/25/90
176.43
k k k k k k
176.43
155A61
05/29/90
3,360.00
k k k k k k
3,360.00
155A80
05/22/90
42.51
k * k k k
42.51
155A96
05/22/90
33.50
33.50
k k k k k k
155B03
05/22/90
65.30
65.30
k k k k k k
155B05
05/22/90
27.68
155B05
05/22/90
20.64
155B05
05/22/90
2.33
k * k * * k
50.65
155807
05/22/90
2,177.26
2,177.26
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACTION MAILING SERV
MAGAZINE EXPENSES
AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE
MEAT
AM LASER CUT GRAFIX
GENERAL SUPPLIES
AMER PHOTO COPY
SERVICE CONTRACT
AMER, PHOTO COPY
SERVICE CONTRACT
AMERICAN SHARECOM
TELEPHONE
AIM ELECTRONICS
SCOREBOARD INSTAL
ASTLEFORD INTL
CHAMBER
AUTOMOBILE SERV CTR
REPAIRS-
BENSON
LAUNDRY
BACH -BILL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BACH -BILL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BACH -BILL
OFFICE SUPPLIES
BADGER METER INC
H2O METERS
06 -04 -90 PAGE 9
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
12- 4215- 434 -43 3244
27- 4624 - 663 -66 5506
* ** -CKS
30- 4504 - 782 -78 65392 7722
10- 4200 - 420 -42 008042 * ** -CKS
10-4288-420-42 008043
* ** -CKS
10- 4256 - 510 -51
* ** -CKS
60- 1300 - 005 -20 7577 6752
* ** -CKS
10- 4540- 560 -56 A63745 7605
* ** -CKS
10- 4248 - 560 -56 1390 7603
* ** -CKS
10- 4262- 646 -64 301711
* ** -CKS
30- 4504 - 781 -78
30- 4504 - 782 -78
30- 4516 - 781 -78
x ** -CKS
40- 1220 - 000 -00 627952 5198
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
155B13
05/25/90
155B13
05/25/90
155B13
05/22/90
155814
05/25/90
*r R R R k
155618
05/25/90
155618
05/25/90
155618
05/22/90
155818
05/22/90
R R R R R R
155B22
05/29/90
R k R R R R
155B27
05/22/90
155B27
05/22/90
155627
05/22/90
k k k k k k
155830
05/25/90
155B30
05/25/90
155B30
05/29/90
155B30
05/22/90
155B30
05/25/90
155B30
05/25/90
155B30
05/22/90
155B30
05/22/90
155830
05/22/90
155630
05/22/90
155830
05/25/90
155B30
05/22/90
k k k k k k
155832
05/22/90
R R R R k R
155B42
05/25/90
155842
05/22/90
AMOUNT
136.00
1,730.47
3,937.88
5,804.35 *
604.50
604.50 *
122.79
34.31
337.31
31.63
526.04
203.90
203.90
142.00
324.50
263.00
729.50
487.90
68.46
38.98
19.20
40.54
112.47
316.80
49.50
129.00
32.25
23.92
30.38
1,349.40
109.81
109.81
47.46
107.47
154.93
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
BARR ENGINEERING PRO ENG SERV
BARR ENGINEERING PRO ENG SERV
BARR ENGINEERING PRO ENG SERV
BARRETT MOV & STOR MOVING VOTING EQUIP
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
BEER WHOLESALERS
BERGFORD TRUCKING
BERGFORD TRUCKING
BERGFORD TRUCKING
BERTELSON BROS. INC
BERTELSON BROS. INC
BERTELSON BROS. INC
BERTELSON BROS. INC
BERTELSON BROS. INC
BERTELSON BROS. INC
BERTELSON BROS. INC
BERTELSON BROS. INC
BERTELSON BROS. INC
BERTELSON BROS. INC
BERTELSON BROS. INC
BERTELSON BROS. INC
BEST LOCK OF MPLS
BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY
BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY
BRAKE SHOES
BATTERY
BATTERY
BATTERY
BEER
LIQUOR DELIVERY
LIQUOR DELIVERY
LIQUOR DELIVERY
GENREAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COUNTER PENS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
KROY TAPE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
WRIST REST
WRIST REST
DATA STAMP.
FILE BOXES
PADLOCKS
PHOTO SUPPLIES
PHOTO SUPPLIES
d
A
06 -04 -90 PAGE 10
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4201 - 260 -26
41- 4201 - 900 -90
41- 4201 - 900 -90
10- 4201 - 184 -18 C17620
10- 4540 - 560 -56 17678 7376
10- 4540 - 560 -56 17678 7742
10- 4540 - 560 -56 16175 7282
10- 4540 - 560 -56 16528 7356
27- 4630 - 667 -66 7905
50- 4626 - 822 -82
50- 4626 - 842 -84
50- 4626 - 862 -86
10- 4504 - 420 -42
10- 4504 - 420 -42
10- 4504 - 420 -42
10- 4504 - 490 -49
10- 4504 - 510 -51
10- 4504 - 510 -51
10- 4504- 510 751
10- 4504 - 510 -51
10- 4504 - 520 -52
10- 4504 - 520 -52
10- 4516 - 140 -14
10- 4516 - 140 -14
570063
569862
571400
567415
569866
569865
565483
567415
566000 7784
566320 7784
569865
567415
40- 4504 - 801 -80 4138 7265
10- 4504 - 560 -56 140938 7652
10- 4508- 420 -42 137290 7634
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
DINNER MEETING
xxxxxx
155862
05/22/90
168.82
MEETING
BROCK WHITE
CURB /CUTTER JOINT
168.82
SURVEY EQUIP
xxxxxx
SURVEY EQUIP
BRUNSON INSTRUMENT
MEASURING TAPE
155872
05/22/90
998.75
GENERAL SUPPLIES
155872
05/25/90 -
12.05
COST /GOODS SOLD
155B72
05/25/90
12.05
COPIER RENTAL
xxxxxx
AD FOR BIDS
1,022.85
AD FOR BIDS
155B79
05/25/90
145.55
145.55'
* ** -CKS
xxxxxx
025261
7034
155882
05/29/90
1,026.24
* ** -CKS
155882
05/29/90
241.80
155682
05/22/90
58.71
* ** -CKS
10- 4210 - 140 -14
113339
1,326.75
155B83
05/29/90
825.88
30- 4214 - 781 -78
113657
825:88-*
xxvxxx
155891
05/22/90
40.00
40.00
xxxxxx
.155C01
05/29/90
97.21
155C01
05/22/90
499.97
597.18
xxxxxx
155C15
05/29/90
1,212.00
1,212.00
xxxxxx
155C17
05/22/90
95.94
xxxxxx
95.94
155C25
05/29/90
40.85
155C25
05/29/90
51.30
155C25
05/29/90
43.88
136.03
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
BOYUM EQUIPMENT
REPAIR PARTS
BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE
DINNER MEETING
BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE
MEETING
BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE
MEETING
BROCK WHITE
CURB /CUTTER JOINT
BRUNSON INSTRUMENT
SURVEY EQUIP
BRUNSON INSTRUMENT
SURVEY EQUIP
BRUNSON INSTRUMENT
MEASURING TAPE
BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC
AG -LIME
BURY & CARLSON INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
C & S DISTRIBUTING
COST /GOODS SOLD
C & S DISTRIBUTING
COST /GOODS SOLD
CARLSON REFRIG.
BEER RACKS.
CDP
COPIER RENTAL
CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO
AD FOR BIDS
CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO
AD FOR BIDS
CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO
ADVERTISING
06 -04 -90 PAGE 11
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56 5086 7283
* ** -CKS
10- 4206 - 100 -10
10- 4206 - 420 -42
10- 4206 - 440 -44
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 314 -30 7440
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 260 -26
080460
5353
10- 4504 - 260 -26
080461
5353
10- 4504 - 260 -26
080379
5353
10- 4522 - 643 -64
6709
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 314 -30
34448
* ** -CKS
23- 4624 - 613 -61
105766
7567
23- 4624 - 613 -61
105218
7410
* ** -CKS
50- 1300 - 003 -00
025261
7034
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 540 -54
* ** -CKS
10- 4210 - 140 -14
113339
10- 4210 - 140 -14
113340
30- 4214 - 781 -78
113657
7857
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
06 -04 -90
PAGE 12
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
#
MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
155C27
05/29/90
1,526.00
CHEMLAWN
WEED SPRAYING
10- 4566 - 643 -64
6261
1,526.00
k * * k
•
* ** -CKS
155C29
05/29/90
310.00
CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS
PRINTING
10- 4201-627 -62
8469
7910
310.00
*
* ** -CKS
155C35
05/25/90
77.80
CITYLINE
ADVERTISING
30- 4214 - 781 -78
553
7841
77.80
*
* ** -CKS
155C39
05/22/90
106.00
CLEAN -FLO LAB
PERMIT
10- 4201 - 358 -30
5309
6831
106.00.*
k
i
* ** -CKS
155C44
05/29/90
238.00
COCA COLA.BOTTLING
COKE
.26- 4624 - 683 -68
7066
238.00
k R
* ** -CKS
155C49
05/25/90
729.00
COMPUTERLAND
LQ 1050
10- 4901 - 160 -16
7704
729.00
* k * k
* ** -CKS
155C93
05/29/90
678.35
CERT HYD SPEC
HYD PUMP REPAIR
10- 4540- 560 -56
72400
7504
678.35
* * * * *k
* ** -CKS
155C97
05/29/90
1,250.00
CYLINDER CITY
HYD CYLINDER
10- 4540 - 560 -56
27157
6658
1,250.00
* k * * k*
.. -...
* ** -CKS
155C99
05/22/90
1,050.00
C &W TURF
SOD
27- 4562 - 664 -66
2878
7200
1,050.00
* * * * * k
-
* ** -CKS
155D07
05/29/90
48.13
D.C. HEY CO.
SERVICE CONTRACT
30- 4288 - 781 -78
172908
7902
48.13
* ** -CKS
155D24
05/25/90
67.50
DIANE SANKEY
EXAM FEE
10- 4202 - 281 -28
155D24
05/25/90
2.00
DIANE SANKEY
PARKING
10- 4202 - 640 -64
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
155D24
05/25/90
2.00
DIANE SANKEY
LATE FEE
155D24
05/25/90
45.20
DIANE SANKEY
STEEL SINKS
155D24
05/25/90
43.78
DIANE SANKEY
TOOLS /HOLDER
160.48
155D33
05/29/90
225.75
DAVIS- EUGENE
SERVICES
155D33
05/29/90
215.25
DAVIS- EUGENE
SERVICES
155D33
05/29/90
51.26
DAVIS- EUGENE
MILEAGE
492.26
155D88
05/25/90
437.79
DUO CHEM
NO RUST
155D88
05/25/90
204.15
DUO CHEM
NO RUST
641.94
155E02
05/22/90
533.28
E KRAEMER & SONS INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
533.28
155E14
05/22/90
147.60
EARL F. ANDERSON
SIGNS
155E14
05/22/90
208.80
EARL F. ANDERSON
SIGNS
356.40
155E20
05/22/90
85.00
ECOLAB PEST ELIM.
SERVICE
85.00
155E54
05/25/90
44.50
EIDE SAW & KNIFE
CARBIDE TIPPING
44.50
* * * * **
155E75
05/22/90
300.00
EMPLOYEES CLUB
SUPPLIES...
300.00
* *klt 7Y*
•
155F02
05/25/90
299.79
FACILITY SYSTEMS
CHAIR
299.79
155FIl
05/22/90
25.00
FEED RITE CONTROL
SHELF
155F11
05/22/90
2,618.52
FEED RITE CONTROL
H2O CHEMICALS
2,643.52
* * * * **
06 -04 -90 PAGE 13
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4310 - 560 -56
10- 4504 - 646 -64
10- .4580- 301 -30
* ** -CKS
10-4201-600-60
10- 4201 - 600 -60
10- 4208 - 600 -60
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 560 -56 6612 7348
10- 4540 - 560 -56 6580 7349_
* ** -CKS
40- 4504 - 803 -80 9960
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 520 -52 96357 6404
10- 4542 - 325 -30 96277 7601
* ** -CKS
30- 4288 - 782 -78 P87198
* ** -CKS
10- 4580 - 301 -30 64282 ,7637
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 500 -50
* ** -CKS
10- 4901 - 510 -51 47838 7853
* ** -CKS
40- 4622 - 805 -80 138963 7509
40- 4622 - 805 -80 138962 7342
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
* ** -CKS
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
155F26
05/22/90
456.16
FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL
SEWER CLEAN SUP
155F26
05/22/90
498.16
FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL
BALL VALVE
10- 4616 - 560 -56
52869 7371
954.32
10- 4620 - 560 -56
53146 7582
* ** -CKS
50- 4248 - 841 -84
155G08
05/25/90
2,976.91
10- 4286 - 220 -22
G.L. CONTRACTING INC
STORM SEWER REPAIR
10- 4286 - 220 -22
21060
2,976.91
10- 4286 - 220 -22
21019
k* k k k k
* ** -CKS
10- 4510 - 440 -44
792 5058
155G24
05/25/90
56.70
GEN. COMMUNICATIONS
SERVICE ON RADIO
56.70
k k k k k k
155G26
.05/25/90
18.72
GENERAL OFFICE PROD
GENERAL SUPPLIES
18.72
*
k k k k k k
155G62
05/29/90
102.00
GRANDMA S CUPBOARD
POPCORN
102.00
*
kkkkkk
155G79
05/29/90
15,311.00
GREUPNER -JOE
GOLF LESSONS
15,311.00
k k k k k k
155H09
05/22/90
494.90
HALLMAN
GREASE
155H09
05/29/90
701.80
HALLMAN
ANTI FREEZE
1,196.70
kW a k klY
••
155H30
05/22/90
549.87
HARMON GLASS & GLAZE
WINDOW REPLACEMENT
549.87
k k k k k k
1.55H33
05/29/90
208.47
HENN CTY SHERIFF
BOOKING FEES
208.47
155H34
05/25/90
7,025.65
HENN COUNTY TREAS.
WORKHOUSE /JAIL
155H34
05/22/90
4,781.50
HENN COUNTY TREAS.
WORKHOUSE /JAIL
11,807.15
155H36
05/22/90
175.98
HENN CTY MED CENTER
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
k k k k k k
175.98
r
06 -04 -90 PAGE 14
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
40- 4504 - 810 -80 3684 7455
40- 4540 - 810 -80 3688 7733
* ** -CKS
41 -4248- 900 -90 27692 7643
* ** -CKS
10- 4294 - 560 -56
65149
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 420 -42
* ** -CKS
27- 4624 - 663 -66
5517
* ** -CKS
27- 4201 - 661 -66
* ** -CKS
10- 4616 - 560 -56
52869 7371
10- 4620 - 560 -56
53146 7582
* ** -CKS
50- 4248 - 841 -84
* ** -CKS
10- 4286 - 220 -22
10- 4286 - 220 -22
21060
10- 4286 - 220 -22
21019
* ** -CKS
10- 4510 - 440 -44
792 5058
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
155H74
05/22/90
k k k k k k
6848\
155H85
05/25/90
155H85
05/25/90
155H85
05/25/90
155H85
05/25/90
REMODELING
50- 1300 - 003 -00
155I59
05/25/90
k k k k k k
155J27
05/22/90
155J27
05/22/90
155J27
05/29/90
155J27
05/29/90
k k k k k k
155J35
05/22/90
k k k k k k
155J74
05/22/90
155J74
05/22/90
155J74
05/22/90
155J74
05/25/90
155J74
05/22/90
kfikkk*
155J99
05/29/90
155K09
05/22/90
k k k k k k
155K14
05/25/90
AMOUNT
8.48
8.48
120.00
38.50
35.00
490.00
683.50
169.50
169.50
35.55
17.50
65.44
26.80
145.29
240.00
240.00
77.42-
136.16
24.82
44.39
85.65
213.60 *
40.00
40.00 *
14.28
14.28 *
166.06
166.06 *
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
HOOTEN CLEANERS LAUNDRY
HUMPHREY RADIATOR
HUMPHREY RADIATOR
HUMPHREY RADIATOR
HUMPHREY RADIATOR
INTERIOR COM SYS
JERRYS FOODS
JERRYS FOODS
JERRYS FOODS
JERRYS FOODS
JERRYS PRINTING
JUSTUS LUMBER
JUSTUS LUMBER
JUSTUS LUMBER
JUSTUS LUMBER
JUSTUS LUMBER
JANET CANTON
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
RADIATOR REPAIR
EQUIP RENTAL
MEETING EXPENSES
MEETING EXPENSES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PERMIT FORMS
06 -04 -90 PAGE 15
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4262 - 420 -42
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56 7576
10- 4540- 560 -56 7661
10- 4540 - 560 -56 7100
10- 4540- 560 -56 7586
10- 4226 - 420 -42 027347
10- 4206 - 500 -50
10- 4206 - 500 -50
10- 4504 - 627 -62
23- 4504 - 611 -61
10- 4204 - 490 -49 502456
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS.
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
CREDIT
10- 4540 - 540 -54
6832
LUMBER
41- 4504- 900 -90
32639
6848\
REMODELING
50- 1300 - 003 -00
25795
5881
REMODELING
50- 1300- 003 -00
35062
7143
REMODELING
50- 1300 - 003 -00
23543
5384
MILEAGE.5[16 -5/29
KAMAN BEARING & SPLY PARTS
* ** -CKS
10- 4208 - 160 -16
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56 7174
* ** -CKS
KAPAK CORP GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 46498 7723
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
06 -04
-90
PAGE 16
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
#
MESSAGE
155K35
05/22/90
39.42
KNOX COMM CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 314 -30
607973
7511
155K35
05/22/90
4.38
KNOX COMM CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 314 -30
607971
7511
155K35
05/22/90
22.54
KNOX COMM CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 560 -56
608192
7469
155K35
05/25/90
42.29
KNOX COMM CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 560 -56
607886
7525
155K35
05/29/90
14.56
KNOX COMM CREDIT
CEMENT
10- 4522- 646 -64
584385
7608
155K35
05/29/90
15.65
KNOX COMM CREDIT
CEMENT
10- 4522- 646 -64
607755
7650
155K35
05/25/90
28.93
KNOX COMM CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
607954
7522
155K35
05/22/90
39.48
KNOX COMM CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4580 - 301 -30
608218
7368
155K35
05/29/90
11.85
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
10- 4604 - 646 -64
583901.7660
155K35
05/29/90
52.76
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
10- 4604 - 646 -64
584312
7656
155K35
05/29/90
23.70
KNOX COMM CREDIT
WOOD /BLEACHERS
10- 4604 - 646 -64
605355
7825
155K35
05/29/90
56.65
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
10- 4604 - 646 -64
584307
7636
155K35
05/29/90
45.95
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
27- 4604 - 662 -66
584306
7686
155K35
05/29/90
68.16
KNOX COMM CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
28- 4504 - 702 -70
607692
7557
466.32
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
155K63
05/25/90
170.50
KUSTOM ELECTRONICS
EQUIP REPLACEMENT
10 -4901- 420 -42
170.50
*
* * * * **
i
* ** -CKS
155L04
05/25/90
117.00
LAHASS
REPAIR WORK
10- 4248 - 560 -56
9,442
7810
117.00
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
155L22
05/25/90
455.00
LANDSCAPE & TURF
SEED
27- 4562 - 664 -66
4498
7697
155L22
05/25/90
375.00
LANDSCAPE & TURF
SEED
27- 4562 - 664 -66
4540
7804
830.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
155L28
05/25/90
223.16
LAWSON PRODUCTS
ELEC SUPPLYS
10- 4504 - 322 -30
7269
155L28
05/22/90
32.82
LAWSON PRODUCTS
TOOL
10- 4504 - 322 -30
7961
155L28
05/22/90
150.22
LAWSON PRODUCTS
FASTENERS
10- 4504 - 325 -30
7273
155L28
05/25/90
122.01
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 325 -30
7741
155L28
05/22/90
440.82
LAWSON PRODUCTS
RIVET KIT
10- 4504 - 325 -30
7274
155L28
05/22/90
174.02
LAWSON PRODUCTS
WASHERS
10- 4504 - 560 -56
7275
155L28
05/22/90
126.60
LAWSON PRODUCTS
SCREWS
10- 4504 - 646 -64
7271
155L28
05/25/90
146.85
LAWSON PRODUCTS
FASTENERS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
7270
155L28
05/22/90
361.93
LAWSON PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
7167
155L28
05/22/90
290.82
LAWSON PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
7160
155L28
05/22/90
161.29
LAWSON PRODUCTS
DRIVERS
10- 4580 - 301 -30
7162
155L28
05/22/90
426.31
LAWSON PRODUCTS
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
7159
155L28
05/22/90
207.66
LAWSON PRODUCTS
BLADE REFIL
10- 4620 - 560 -56
7173
155L28
05/22/90
471.05
LAWSON PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 802 -80
7158
3,335.56
* * * * * R
* ** -CKS
155L46
05/29/90
172.46
LIEN INFECTION CON
CLEANING
27- 4288 - 667 -66
16110
7904
172.46
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
xxxxxx i,
10- 4204 - 140 -14
155L70
05/22/90
155L70
05/22/90
155L70
05/29/90
xxxxxx
155L82
05/29/90
155L82
05/22/90
xxxxxx
155M16
05/22/90
xxxxxx
155M18
05/29/90
xxxxxx
155M20
05/22/90
155M20
05/22/90
xxxxxx
7468
155M22
05/29/90
155M27
05/22/90
155M27
05/22/90
155M27
05/22/90
155M27'
05/29/90
155M27
05/29/90
155M27
05/29/90
155M27
05/29/90
155M27
05/22/90
155M27
05/22/90
155M27
05/25/90
155M27
05/29/90
155M27
05/29/90
155M27
05/22/90
155M27
05/22/90
AMOUNT
90.00
90.00
90.00
270.00
.65.35
8.65
74.00 *
325.68
325.68 *
155.18
155.18 *
40.00
40.00
80.00 *
945.78
945.78 *
180.51
117.25
498.75
249.40
464.50
381.05
445.00
327.27
498.50
415.00
489.00
454.50
438..80
490.00
5,449.53
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
LUCY ROSCHE
LUCY ROSCHE
LUCY ROSCHE
LYNDALE HARDWARE
LYNDALE HARDWARE
MCCAREN DESIGNS
MCGARVEY COFFEE
MCMA
MCMA
MCNEILUS STEEL
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
xxx,vxx
155M29 05/25/90 246.40 MESSERLI & KRAMER
CLEANING
CLEANING
CLEANING
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MISC PLANTS
REPAIRS
05 -04 -90 PAGE 17
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. 9 MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
27- 4201 - 662 -66 30572 4911
27- 4201 - 662 -66 30573 4912
27- 4201- 662 -66 30574 4913
* ** -CKS
30- 4504 - 782 - 78.328684 7850
30- 4504 - 782 -78 327894 7779
* ** -CKS
30- 4660 - 782 -78 2976
* ** -CKS
27- 4248- 663 -66 760157 7184
* ** -CKS
DUES
10- 4204 - 140 -14
DUES
10- 4204 - 140 -14
* ** -CKS
STEEL FOR STACK
10- 4620 - 560 -65
64181
7364
* ** -CKS
LOTION
10- 4504 - 301 -30
24211
7468
SOIL STERILANT
10- 4504 - 301 -30
24242
7523
PAINT STRIPPER
10- 4504 - 325 -30
24198
7447
GARBAGE CAN INSERTS
10- 4504- 645 -64
24329
7749
GARBAGE.BAGS
10- 4504 - 645 -64
24266
7853
CLEANING SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
24304
7662
FLOOR SCRUBBER
10- 4504 - 646 -64
24256
7528
CLEANING SUPPLIES
10- 4512- 540 -54
24185
7380
RAKE /MOPHEADS
10- 4512- 540 -54
24181
6163
SHAMPOO PLUS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
24257
7529
CARPET REPAIR
27- 4248 - 662 -66
24364
7696
CLEANING SUPPLIES
28- 4512 - 702 -70
24301
7681
CLEANING SUPPLIES
30- 4512 - 782 -78
24303
7703
SEWER BLOCS
40- 4504 - 801 -80
24209
7459 -
AMBULANCE COLLECT 10- 3180 - 000 -00
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
155M29 05/25/90
ww * ***
155M32
05/22/90
155M32
05/29/90
155M35
05/22/90
*w * * *w
CHECK REGISTER
155M42
05/22/90
155M42
05/22/90
155M42
05/22/90
155M42
05/22/90
155M42
05/22/90
155M42
05/22/90
155M42
05/22/90
*w *ww*
155M46
05/29/90
155M46
05/29/90
*rt * *ww
155M68
05/25/90
155M68
05/25/90
155M68
05/29/90
.155M68
05/29/90
155M68
05/29/90
155M68
05/29/90
155M68
05/29/90
155M68
05/29/90
155M68
05/29/90
155M68
05/29/90
155M69
05/29/90
501.12
155M80
05/29/90
155M80
05/29/90
155M80
05/29/90
155M80
05/22/90
155M80
05/29/90
CHECK REGISTER
06 -04 -90
PAGE 18
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. #
MESSAGE
150.79
MESSERLI & KRAMER
AMBULANCE COLLECT
10- 3180 - 000 -00
397.19
* ** -CKS
170.61
M AMUNDSON
CIGARETTES
50- 4632- 862 -86
330.51
M AMUNDSON
CIGARETTES
50- 4632 - 862 -86
501.12
*
* ** -CKS
218,619.58
METRO WASTE CONTROL
SEWER SERVICE
40 -4312- 812 -80
505006
218,619.58
*
* ** -CKS
1,446.84
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
10- 4524 - 301 -30
3420
38.40
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
10- 4524 - 301 -30
040022
411.41
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
10- 4524 - 301 -30
3467
4,562.03
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
10- 4524 - 314 -30
3420
4,469.96
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
10- 4524- 314 -30
3467
38.58
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
40- 4524 - 803 -80
3420
185.46
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
40- 4524 - 803 -80
3467
11,152.68
*
* ** -CKS
177.96
METZ BAKING CO
BREAD
27- 4624 - 663 -66
5511
209.00
METZ BAKING CO
BREAD
27- 4624 - 663 -66
5511
386.96
*
* ** -CKS
73.83
MN. CELLULAR TEL.
CAR PHONE
10- 4204 - 100 -10
173.92
MN. CELLULAR TEL.
PHONE
10- 4204 - 140 -14
6.42
MN. CELLULAR TEL.
EQUIP RE'NTAL
10- 4226- 420 -42
55.35
MN. CELLULAR TEL.
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
11.70
MN. CELLULAR TEL.
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
105.25
MN. CELLULAR TEL.
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
63.75
MN. CELLULAR TEL.
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
9.60
MN. CELLULAR TEL.
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
44.55
MN. CELLULAR TEL.
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
27.26
MN. CELLULAR TEL.
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
571.63
*
60.00
MCC /MIDWEST
CRAFT SUPPLIES
23- 4588 - 611 -61
38992 7413
60.00
*
* ** -CKS
19.88
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
ORDINANCE
10- 4210- 140 -14
87680
140.00
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
ORDINANCE
10- 4210 - 140 -14
87681
24.60
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
ORDINANCE
10- 4210- 140 -14
87683
12.98
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
NOTICE OF HRG
10- 4210 - 140 -14
87626
33.45
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
ORDINANCE
10- 4210 - 140 -14
87682
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
155M80
05/29/90
155M80
05/22/90
155M81
05/29/90
.155M81
05/25/90
155M81
05/29/90
*xrxxx
155M85
05/25/90
155M85
05/25/90
155M85
05/29/90
xxxxxx
155M90
05/29/90
155M90
05/29/90
155M90
05/22/90
155M90
05/22/90
155M90
05/22/90
155M90
05/22/90
155M90
05/22/90
155M90
05/22/90
*xxxxx
155M97
05/22/90
xxxrxx
155N09
05/22/90
155N09
05/22/90
155N09
05/22/90
x� *xxx
155N13
05/29/90
155N13
05/29/90
xxxxxx
155N33
05/22/90
xxxxxx
155N82
05/29/90
155N82
05/29/90
AMOUNT
23.60
27.14
281.65 *
357.86
2,486.53
143.76
2,988.15 *
17.00
25.26
48.98
91.24 *
382.30
506.09
231.00
462.00
135.00
154.00
210.38
319.00
2,399.77 *
6,094.02
6,094.02 *
53.50
146.88
76.98
277.36
43.45
43.45
86.90
113.00
113.00
134.91
27.00
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
MN
SUBURBAN NEWS
AD FOR BIDS
MN
SUBURBAN NEWS
AD FOR BIDS
MN.
TORO INC.
IRRIG ATION PARTS
MN.
TORO INC.
IRRIGATION
MN.
TORO INC..
MOWER ASSY
MN. WANNER
MN. WANNER
MN. WANNER
MODEL STONE CO
MODEL STONE CO
MODEL STONE CO
MODEL STONE CO
MODEL STONE CO
MODEL STONE CO
MODEL STONE CO
MODEL STONE CO
MPLS FINANCE DEPT
MUNICILITE CO
MUNICILITE CO
MUNICILITE CO
MUZAK
MUZAK
NELSON RADIO COMM
NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY
NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
REPAIR PARTS
PARTS /SPRAYER
06 -04 -90 PAGE 19
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4210 - 140 -14 87679
10- 4210- 140 -14 87625
10- 4201- 647 -64 7757
10- 4204 - 647 -64 114959 7519
27- 4504 - 664 -66 115933 7290
10- 4540 - 560 -56 75042
10- 4540 - 560 -56 75116
10- 4540- 642 -64 75207 7831
CONCRETE
10- 4201 - 647 -64
85412
7829
CONCRETE
10- 4201 - 647 -64
85360
7830
CURBING
10- 4528 - 301 -30
84370
2235
CONCRETE
40- 4528 - 803 -80
84869
CONCRETE
40- 4528 - 803 -80
83944
2235
CONCRETE
40- 4528- 803 -80
84868
CONCRETE
40- 4528 - 803 -80
85214
FILL MATERIAL
41- 4518 - 900 -90
85411
WATER PURCHASED 40- 4640 - 803 -80
REPAIR WORK 10- 4540 - 560 -56 2093 6631
BRACKET /LITE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 2149 7366
BRACKET /LITE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 2120 7023
ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 822 -82 109006
ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 862 -86 109006
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
SIGNAL REPAIR 10- 4620 - 560 -56 15756 7606
* ** -CKS
GENERAL SUPPLIES 23 -4504- 612 -61 172426 7301
COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624- 613 -61 172466 7712
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
155N82
05/29/90
397.82
NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY
COST OF GOODS
559.73
* * * * **
155017
05/25/90
1,431.00
OFFICE PRODUCTS
SERVICE CONTRACT
* * * * **
1,431.00
155024
05/25/90
502.95
OFFSET PRINTING
PRINTING
502.95
* * * * **
155037
05/25/90
102.00
BILL OLSON
BLACK DIRT
* * * * **
102.00
155050
05/29/90
617.16
OWENS SERVICE CO
CONTRACT REPAIR
617.16
* * * * **
155P03
05/25/90
1,071.00
PACE LAB
WATER TREATING
* * * * **
1,071.00
155P28
05/22/90
244.11
PLANT EQUIP INC
REPAIR PARTS
244.11
155P46
05/22/90
192.82
PIONEER RIM & WHEEL
SPACER
192.82
155P48
05/29/90
62.23
PIP PRINTING
PRINTING
155P48
05/22/90
12.70
PIP PRINTING
PRINTING,._...
74.93
* * * * **
155Q20
05/25/90
71.70
QUICK SERV BATTERY
FILTERS
155Q20
05/25/90
85.40
QUICK SERV-BATTERY
FILTER
155Q20
05/25/90
125.76
QUICK SERV BATTERY
FILTERS
282.86
* * * * **
155R22
05/25/90
69.60
REM SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
155R22
05/22/90
298.20
REM SUPPLIES
PAINT /LUMBER
06 -04 -90 PAGE 20
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
23- 4624 - 613 -61 172485 7566
* ** -CKS
10- 4288 - 510 -51 112790 7772
* ** -CKS
10- 4600 - 420 -42 30855 7552
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 318 -30 1211 7105
* ** -CKS
30- 4248 - 782 -.78 46609 7851
i
* ** -CKS
40 -4201- 801 -80 41321 7744
* ** -CKS
40- 4540 - 801 -80 12348 6351
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56 146006 7474
* ** -CKS
23- 4600 - 611 -61 7223 7711
30- 4600- 781 -78 7194 7776
10- 4540 - 560 -56
10- 4540 - 560 -56
10- 4540 - 560 -56
30- 4504 - 783 -78
30- 4544 - 782 -78
35814
42488
43301
1108
1117
* ** -CKS
7365
7285
7808
* ** -CKS
7840
7721
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
155R22
05/29/90
830.00
REM SUPPLIES -
CONSTRUCTION
xxxxxx
1,197.80
155R25.
05/29/90
84.60
RENTAL EQUIP & SALES
SAW REPAIR
84.60
xxxxxx
155R49
05/25/90
100.80
ROAD RESCUE
MICROPHONE
xxxxxx
100.80
155R53
05/22/90
45.30 48.0±
ROBERT B.•HILL
SALT
45.30 *� *.
xxxxxx
155R69
05/25/90
64.31
ROSLAND
MEETING
155R69
05/25/90
56.85
ROSLAND
MEETING
121.16
xxxxxx
155R79.
05/25/90
698.80
RTW INC.
FEE FOR SERVICE
155R79
05/22/90
818.30
RTW INC.
FEE FOR SERVICE
1,517.10
xxxxxx
155R81
05/29/90
24.99
RUBENSTEIN & ZIFF
CRAFT SUPPLIES
xxxxxx
24.99
155510
05/22/90
103.32
SUBURBAN TIRE & AUTO
..
TIRES
155510
05/22/90
258.30
SUBURBAN TIRE & AUTO
TIRES
xxxxxx
361.62
155S13
05/22/90
18.02
SIGN- TI -FIC
SIGNS
18.02
xxxxxx
155S27
05/22/90
209.88
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
THINNER /PAINT
155S27
05/25/90
187.75
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
PAINT
155S27
05/29/90
198.20
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
PAINT
155527
05/29/90
141.54
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
PAINT
737.37
xxxxxx
06 -04790 PAGE 21
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
60 -1300- 005 -20 01092 7195
* ** -CKS
10- 4248 - 644 -64 12035 7599
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56 50118 7520
* ** -CKS
10-4504-440-4423114 5054
**A-CKS
10- 4206 - 100 -10
10- 4206 - 140 -14
* ** -CKS
10- 4260 - 510 -51
10- 4260 - 510 -51
* ** -CKS
23- 4588 - 611 -61 165684 7569
* ** -CKS
10- 4616 - 560 -56 8399 7258
10- 4616- 560 -56 8269 7171
* ** -CKS
50- 1300 - 003 -00 07846
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 325 -30 04891 5671
10- 4504 - 325 -30 66486 7532
28- 4544- 702 -70 66262 7556 -
28- 4544- 702 -70 73771 7680
* ** -CKS
t
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
06 -04
-90
PAGE 22
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
#
MESSAGE
155551
05/29/90
105.60
ST PAUL CANDY /TOBAC
CIGARS
27- 4624 - 663 -66
23424
5516
105.60
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
155567
05/25/90
3,208.00
STORE FRONT
HUMAN SERVICES
10- 4201 - 504 -50
112306
3,208.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
155572
05/25/90
165.30
STREICHERS
GASKET /FLASHER
10- 4540 - 560 -56
M71230
7581
165.30
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
155577
05/22/90
100.00
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR WORK
10- 4248 - 560 -56
101671
155577
05/25/90
100.00
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR WORK
10- 4248 - 560 -56
102371
155577
05/29/90
1,862.53
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
BODY REPAIR
10- 4248 - 560 -56
7401
7740
155577
05/22/90
6.38
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
WIRE
10- 4540 - 540 -54
125314
155577
05/22/90
134.36
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR WORK
10- 4540 - 560 -56
101952
155577
05/22/90
32.00
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
ASM
10- 4540 - 560 -56
125325
155577
05/25/90
3.24
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
CLIP
10- 4540 - 560 -56
125733
155577
05/25/90
32.01
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
PIPE ASSM
10- 4540 - 560 -56
125903
155577
05/25/90
20.41
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
SWITCH
10- 4540 - 560 -56
125730
2,290.93
155578
05/25/90
11.96
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
BALL VALVE
10- 4540 - 560 -56
7809
155578`
05/29/90
214.52
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
PLBG PARTS
10- 4540 - 646 -64
7745
155578
05/29/90
27.37
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
PLBG PARTS
10- 4540 - 646 -64
155578
05/25/90
258.19
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 801 -80
7377
155578
05/25/90
56.73
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 801 -80
7512
155578
05/25/90
375.91
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 807 -80
7367
155578
05/25/90
187.93
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
TOOLS
40- 4580 - 801 -80
7373
1,132.61
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
155590
05/22/90
276.50
SWANSON BROTHERS
PSLLETS /CEMENT
41- 4504 - 900 -90
26823
7172
155590
05/22/90
276.50-
SWANSON BROTHERS
PSLLETS /CEMENT
41- 4504 - 900 -90
26823
7172
155590
05/22/90
276.50
SWANSON BROTHERS
PELLETS /CEMENT
41- 4504- 900 -90
26823
7172
276.50
*
** * * **
9**-CKS
155592
05/22/90
11.32
SYSTEM SUPPLY
RIBBON
10- 4504 - 510 -51
050540
7724
11.32
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
155597
05/25/90
715.68
SEH
PRO ENG SERV
40- 4201 - 800 -80
7386
715.68
* ** -CKS
155T05
05/22/90
121.00
THE PRINT SHOP
PRINTING
10- 4206 - 500 -50
92206
7785
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
* * * * **
121.00
155T11
05/22/90
58.80
TESSMAN SEED & CHEM.
FERTILIZER
155T11
05/29/90
440.51
TESSMAN SEED & CHEM.
CHEMICALS
155T11
05/29/90
698.80
TESSMAN SEED & CHEM.
WEED KILLER
1,198.11
* * * * **
155T13
05/25/90
885.00
TOM HORWATH
FORESTRY
155T13
05/25/90
15.00
TOM HORWATH
REFUND /SCHOOL
155T13
05/25/90
83.89
TOM HORWATH
MILEAGE
983.89
* * * * **
155T40
05/22/90
29.13
TOLL COMPANY
PROPANE
155T40
05/22/90
76.50
TOLL COMPANY
PROPANE CYLINDERS
155T40
05/22/90
24.17
TOLL COMPANY
OXYGEN
* * * * **
129.80
155T53
05/25/90
7,875.11
TRACY OIL
GASOLINE
* * * * **
7,875.11
155T66
05/29/90
72.47
TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT
COST /GOODS SOLD
-
155T66
05/29/90.
30.87
TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT
COST /GOODS SOLD
103.34
* * ** **
' 155T74
05/22/90
274.00
TURF SUPPLY CO.
MARKING PAINT
274A0.*
155U08
05/22/90
1,300.70
UNIFORM UNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
155U08
05/22/90
222.75
UNIFORM UNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
155U08
05/22/90
108.00
UNIFORM UNLIMITED
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,631.45
*
155U20
05/22/90
300.00
UNIVERSITY OF MN
SCHOOL
* * * * **
300.00
*
155V15
05/29/90
419.95
VAN PAPER CO.
SUPPLIES
155V15
.05/22/90
827.63
VAN PAPER CO.
PAPER BAGS
06 -04 -90 PAGE 23
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
10 -4558- 520 -52 52007 7782
10- 4558- 643 -64 53652 7370
10- 4566 - 642 -64 54453 7508
* ** -CKS
10- 4201- 644 -64
10- 4202 - 644 -64
10- 4208 - 644 -64
* ** -CKS
10- 4610 - 560 -56 37074 7439
10- 4616 - 560 -56 493931 7605
27- 4580 - 664 -66 37258 7625
* ** -CKS
10- 4612 - 560 -56 T18701 7734
* ** -CKS
23- 4588 - 611 -61 376998 7055
23- 4624 - 613 -61 380443 7568
* ** -CKS
27- 4504 - 664 -66 29433 7372
* ** -CKS
10- 4266 - 420 -42
10- 4266 - 430 =42
10- 4504- 420 -42
* ** -CKS
10- 4202 - 200 -20
* ** -CKS
10- 4514- 520 -52 310902 7844
50- 4514 - 822 -82 308678 7545
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM•DESCRIPTION
155V15
05/22/90
6.69-
VAN PAPER CO.
CREDIT`
155V15
05/22/90
1,384.30
VAN PAPER CO.
PAPER BAGS
155V15
05/22/90
852.10
VAN PAPER CO..
PAPER BAGS
k k k* k k
3,477.29
155V30
05/29/90
391.86
VANTAGE ELECTRIC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
k k k k k k
391.86
155V43
05/29/90
118.98
VERSATILE VEHICLE
REPAIR PARTS
155V43
05/29/90
21.50
VERSATILE VEHICLE
CART PARTS
155V43
05/29/90
248.77
VERSATILE VEHICLE
REPAIR PARTS
155V43
05/29/90
99.88
VERSATILE VEHICLE
CART PARTS
489.13
kkkk * k
155V46
05/25/90
370.74
VESSCO
REPAIR PARTS
*kkkk k
370.74
155W35
05/25/90
125.00
WEIGLE -SUE
REIMBURSEMENT
k k k k k k
125.00
155W41
05/22/90
140.51
WEST PHOTO
PHOTO SUPPLIES
k k k k k k
140.51
155W44
05/25/90
118.75
WEST WELD SUPPLY CO.
ROD
*kkkk k
118.75
-
155W66
05/22/90
60:56
WILLIAMS STEEL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
60.56
*
_.
k kkkk k
155W71
05/29/90
568.25
WINFIELD DEVEL.
RENT
k k k k k k
568.25-*
266T13
05/25/90
83.89
TOM HORWATH
MILEAGE
266T13
05/25/90
83.89-
TOM HORWATH
MILEAGE
.00
k k k k k k
Y
06 -04 -90 PAGE 24
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
50 -4514- 842 -84 1675 7545
50- 4514- 842 -84 308679 7545
50- 4514 - 862 -86 308680 7545
* ** -CKS
28- 4504 - 702 -70 011146 7397
* ** -CKS
27- 4540 - 665 -66 6512 7626
27- 4540 - 665 -66 6488 7551
27- 4540 - 665 -66 6475 7479
27- 4540 - 665 -66 6496 7553
* ** -CKS
40- 4540 - 805 -80 7891 7510
10- 4202 - 600 -60
* ** -CKS
10- 4508 - 420 -42 38107 7555
* ** -CKS
10- 4610 - 560 -56 83650 7516
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 560 -56 7602
10- 4201 - 627 -62 101881
10- 4208 - 644 -64
10- 4208 - 644 -64
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
06 -04 -90 PAGE 25
ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
GENERAL FUND
COMMUNICATIONS
ART CENTER
CAPITAL FUND
SWIMMING POOL FUND
GOLF COURSE FUND
RECREATION CENTER FUND
EDINBOROUGH PARK
UTILITY FUND
STORM SEWER UTILITY
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
CONSTRUCTION FUND
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO. DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
226,841.57
FUND
10
TOTAL
1,198.39
FUND
12
TOTAL
8,403.21
FUND
23
TOTAL
42.00
FUND
25
TOTAL
663.00
FUND
26
TOTAL
23,840.93
FUND
27
TOTAL
1,611.86
FUND
28
TOTAL
8,154.40
FUND
30
TOTAL
253,794.43
FUND
40
TOTAL
9,376.92
FUND
41
TOTAL
6,660.61
FUND
50
TOTAL
35,081.17
FUND
60
TOTAL
575,668.49*
57,5,
TOTAL
06 -04 -90 PAGE 25
ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
GENERAL FUND
COMMUNICATIONS
ART CENTER
CAPITAL FUND
SWIMMING POOL FUND
GOLF COURSE FUND
RECREATION CENTER FUND
EDINBOROUGH PARK
UTILITY FUND
STORM SEWER UTILITY
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
CONSTRUCTION FUND
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, MN. 55101 612 291 -6359
May 25, 1990
Kenneth E. Rosland, Manager
City of Edina
4801 50th St. W.
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mr. Rosland:
Enclosed is the Metropolitan Council's annual statement of changes to our metropolitan system policy plans. This
statement explains how the changes may affect your community and provides current information on metropolitan
systems that serve your community. In 1989, the Council amended the light rail transit section of the Transportation
Development Guide/Policy Plan. In 1990, the Council adopted a new Aviation Policy Plan. The new Aviation Policy
Plan will be mailed to you under separate cover. The amendment to the Transportation Policy Plan is enclosed.
The 1976 Metropolitan Land Planning Act (Minn. Stat. 473.856) requires that local units of government respond to
the Council's metropolitan systems statements as follows:
"Within nine months after receiving an amendment to a metropolitan system plan, each affected local
governmental unit shall review its comprehensive plan ... to determine if an amendment is necessary
to ensure continued conformity with metropolitan system plans. If an amendment is necessary, the
governmental unit ... shall prepare the amendment and submit it to the council for review..."
The deadline for local communities to respond to the 1990 Metropolitan Systems Information Statement is
January 25, 1991.
The Council will hold a planning forum for local government planners and elected officials to discuss the new aviation
and light rail transit policies, and explain how they will affect your community and its comprehensive plan. The
planning forum will be held on Friday, June 22, 9 to 11 a.m. (registration from 8:30 to 9:00), in the Council Chambers
of the Metropolitan Council, 230 East Fifth St., St. Paul. A notice about the planning forum is enclosed with this
letter. Please contact Bernadine Scott at 291 -6500 to let us know if you plan to come. I encourage you to attend this
meeting.
If you have questions about comprehensive plan amendments, please call Anne Hurlburt (291 - 6501). For questions
about aviation policy, call Chauncey Case (291- 6342). For questions about light rail transit policy, call Steve Wilson
(291 - 6344). The Council staff and I look forward to working with you on plan amendments in response to the
Council's 1990 Metropolitan Systems Information Statement for your community.
Sincerely,
S-&,- 4�6—
Steve Keefe, Chair
SK/kp
Enclosures
METROPOLITAN SYSTEMS
- INFORMATION STATEMENT
for
Aviation and Light Rail Planning
from the
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
to
CITIES, COUNTIES AND TOWNSHIPS
in the
METROPOLITAN AREA
May 25, 1990
I. AVIATION
A. Introduction
A number of changes in the Metropolitan Council's newly revised Aviation Development
Guide/Policy Plan affect the City of Edina. To be consistent with the revised policy plan,
the city's comprehensive plan must include certain elements.
This aviation section of the systems statement includes several policy additions and
associated impacts on the City of Edina, information on existing and planned aviation
services and facilities affecting and /or serving Edina, and information on land use and
aviation forecasts.
The potential issues identified here will need to be planned for and managed in a
coordinated effort among the City of Edina, the Council, the Minn6sota Department of
Transportation, the Metropolitan Airports Commission, the county and adjoining
communities. Since many factors affecting the aviation system are beyond the control of
an individual community, the Council recognizes that transportation and land use issues
may be more effectively resolved at an area -wide level. However, the Council believes
there are many things individual communities can do to protect the regional aviation
system from adverse impacts.
The City of Edina is encouraged to adopt a comprehensive plan amendment to address
the issues identified in this systems statement. In preparing any such amendment, Edina
should consult the full text of the Aviation Development Guide/Policy Plan.
B. Significant Policy Changes
This revision incorporates several changes, including:
* Planning information and data updated to a 1988 reference year where feasible
and appropriate.
* Planning horizon expanded to the year 2020.
* Changes in the Airlake Airport Long -Term Comprehensive Plan approved by the
Council in June 1989.
* A substantial amendment reflecting the results of the Council's 1988 -89 Public
Heliport Feasibility Study.
* A significant amendment reflecting the Council's 1987 -88 International Airport
Long -Term Adequacy Study findings.
* A major amendment incorporating requirements of the 1989 Metropolitan Airport
Planning Act.
The City of Edina is encouraged to adopt and implement a comprehensive planning
amendment, if needed, that addresses 1) airports, 2) heliports, and 3) land use. A
checklist for determining the completeness of major comprehensive plan amendments is
located in Appendix A.
Sections of this systems statement that spell out actions needed to be taken by Edina are
indented and off -set with a "o ".
1. Airports
The seven - county metropolitan airports system includes a major hub airport and associated
reliever airports to serve the needs of a large urban complex. This is shown in Figure 1.
The existing relievers are structured to serve primarily the metropolitan urban service area
(MUSA). As urban growth expands in the MUSA, additional aviation demands will be
put on these reliever airports. In those instances where existing airport capacity becomes
deficient, new airports in the rural service area or airports in counties adjacent to the
metropolitan region will need to be developed or enhanced.
The existing airport system is comprised of 11- facilities: one major airport, one
intermediate airport, six public minor airports, two privately owned public -use airports, and
one public -use special purpose facility.
The City of Edina is located within the airport influence area of the major hub airport,
MSP International Airport. Continuing concern about aircraft noise associated with
increased operations at MSP remains a critical issue with respect to the long -term viability
of MSP as the region's sole major airport. Urban development pressures are continuing in
the vicinity of the airport. A program of preventive and corrective land use measures has
been recommended by the MAC under the FAA FAR Part 150 program. It is expected
to be fully under way by the early 1990s.
In regards to airports, the city should:
o Participate in the preparation of a long -term comprehensive airport plan for MSP
Airport.
o Maintain a current comprehensive plan, including zoning ordinances and local
codes that are consistent with the long -term comprehensive airport plans and the
aviation chapter.
o Participate in formulating and administering airport zoning districts in coordination
with the airport owner.
o Participate in efforts to encourage federal, state and local cooperation to reduce
aircraft noise.
o Prepare a local program to reduce, prevent or mitigate aircraft noise impacts on
incompatible land uses.
Ma j or
O _ - Sl rPAFCIS UBFIH[l_
LRawn01:
L.51 BETNCI
Intermediate
Minor
O - - - --
ANOKA CO.
Q Special Purpose LAKE �E,LIIMBII._ '
PAM
ANDOVER NAM I,F �• ,�. -.. ..
6 9
Reliever Airport
` - Search Area - - .�- .�N LINO LAKES �- nARINE
I.
[R� CN. MPLI D k AI�, %CENTERVILLE
HUGO ^
H..OVER
] L L[ rlNts WASHINGTON CO.
Search Area _ _ _ — - - --
GPEINEIELD CORCORAN
?2 I S1i:L:: -TES
Dock ro RO Imo' Y OL Y MNITL }LA■ 1`„T
HENNEPIN - N1 6KLTN - ''NLM��, - YADNAIf� �4 -'•�
.Ionic 0 1'
I❑LOR[no : 5 U is A�DIN 6 `Z SI �TL
( I i ILLf I -_
`NDEPINDENCta MEDINA O► _i w6 LITTLE` "` -.
07 1 NAD , Y i
�. MAPLE PLAIN s i
L KL YT'�Wr:
E LLMO
I
`. LONG LA
OROMO -q * Mg
O N
WATCRIOWN - l•K[LAND
I MINNETRIST- E AIttT -SAY P 1d
HOLLYWOOD I w- TERTOwh
I I � s' a~ �wlin �w000fu 3
L� -- I - ST BONY ACI _ 01 - r 1B Vr�-T M ` .• Ar70h
HE MANY � E NIILC AIRPORT �� III PORT
1 Y[NDOTA SUN
y l
MAN uSE�.I, wM[IGNJjp L K 12
CAMUEN I w•LONIA - L•K ETO::::
CONIA T
'� Ik INV[R G C
L CARVER CO. I _ uCA H GHTS AG[ GROVE DEN+• -RP.
- - - -- - - - --
,.- �P a AO�
TOUN
AMERIC G t"SKA K A CO.
A I � -SHAK OP[[ �M
NORWOODLjc I •CARVER Icy r,so, '� ORJI(YIL
COLOGNEI U< LGRE r: YAG 'I
YOUNG AMERICA BE NIOr: / "
I I - �- PR C7�! IAR LL[ _. � ROSE MOUNT NINIrIGEP
L0II1IS%iLLI L L _ "�x1ls INCr
LNAMB`�URG I _j
_ - -_ I C0A - - -r- -1
III I yA!. FR- N:;IS:'I• ,: J __- ., I I
VLRMILLION
I I I I IR- YESr: -1
SAND CREEK MLLE
SPRING LAKE I CREUIT ` EMPIRE I O I M:R5H -1.
' RIYER AEYIN I VERMILLION
L I
$T, L•WF; 'ICE JORDAN SCOTT CO. I I I
BELL[ PLAIN[ I I I I MARKET
NE Y: O ON['W TRIED I ^I
I I I HAMPTON I I r 1
13LAKELEY BELLE PLAINE HELENA CED•PLAKE I EUREKA CASTLE ROCK I__I
MIESVILLFI
I I I I HAM.PTGN I DOUGLAS
M[W PRAG UEI II ELKO II I I I I
E0
RAXDOI
- I1
1 Minneapolis-St. Paul International I GREENVSLE iWATEREppD
2 St. Paul Downtown I I I SLID,A ; /-
3 Airlake
4 Flying Cloud
5 Crystal 9 Forest Lake
6 Gateway 11 Lake Elmo
7 Anoka County - Blaine 12 South St. Paul Municipal
8 Rice Lake (seaplane base)
In 1987, the Metropolitan Council, with direction from the legislature and with the
assistance of an advisory task force, undertook an evaluation of the long -term (30 -year)
adequacy of MSP International Airport. The major findings were:
* The long -term economic health and growth of the Metropolitan Area and its
multi -state economic region depends on a high level of commercial air service.
* A high probability exists that growing demand for aviation services will exceed the
capacity of MSP within 10 years.
* Runway and taxiway capacity form the major long -term constraints on growth at-
MSP. Terminal capacity and ground access to it also constitute significant
constraints.
* Continued viability of MSP in the short- to mid -term requires attraction of
transient general aviation to reliever airports and encouragement of based general
aviation to relocate from MSP to reliever airports.
* Even with the steady introduction of quieter aircraft, a growing frequency of flights
will increase noise stress on most surrounding communities, affecting more
households over time.
The result of this study is the 'Dual Track" Strategy that calls for enhancing capacity at
MSP (Track A) while keeping the new airport option open by banking land (Track B).
In regards to the dual -track strategy, the city should:
o Monitor the progress of this study as to if, or when, a new airport may be needed
and the location of a search area for a potential new major replacement airport.
o Participate in the public process regarding the continued enhancement of MSP or
the selection of a search area and siting of a potential new major replacement
airport.
2. Heliports
The region now has no freestanding public heliport facility. Projected levels of helicopter
operations in the region are such that planned public facilities must be considered.
Currently, varying services are provided at airports where helicopters are based. Public
heliports are defined as facilities for helicopter operations without prior authorization
from the operator. Heliports may be owned and operated by the public or private sectors.
The development of private helicopter landing facilities is expected to continue to serve
helicopter base- operations and corporate or privately owned helicopters. These facilities
are for the exclusive use of their operator and not available to others without prior
authorization.
Eighteen of the 21 civilian -use helicopters in the region are based at public airports three
at private heliports. Sixteen helicopter landing facilities in the region are privately owned
and used predominantly for providing emergency medical service. Most of these consist of
a single landing pad. The locations of landing facilities and civilian -based helicopters are
shown in Figure 2.
Helicopter services are expected to grow at a moderate rate in the region, with most of
the growth due to business users. Some concentration of future demands is projected to
occur in the Minneapolis and St. Paul downtowns and along theI -494 corridor, but most of
the activity will be distributed throughout the region. Helicopter operators have indicated
that the major problem is the need for heliports that provide refueling services, adequate
ground transportation access and maintenance facilities.
The City of Edina is located within a designated search area in which a minor public
heliport would be appropriate.
Regarding helicopter landing facilities, the city should:
o Use the Council's Model Heliport Ordinance to assist it in responding to heliport
proposals and provide a basis for appropriate land use controls.
o Prepare a heliport development plan for any proposed heliport. Specific
guidelines are listed in the Public Heliport Facility System Plan within the Aviation
Development Guide/Policy Plan.
F I SUP,E 2
LANDING FACILITIES AND CIVILIAN BASED HELICOPTERS
0 T Of Based Helicopters
eAirport / fur Of Based Helicopters
0 Heliport
Q Airports
Ir•Krt S
tf `.
I i I
I I
1
Lrh •.000
I
Bu)ha I �D.• C)OrC
I
I1
.
1 I
�
I
ANOKA
CO.
cow- Gus
1 q I.
r• .u}
•wrll
OO
L R(
IO, 71 t•al I
wEM iEAh O.•
1J
•OA CST LA <C I
I
yI
- -�S,r I ' 0•, }Ow ; `•O..S I LIeO L.<[A I . ,w(
_I i ••U• ^ �'
coo- Dt i
I i I �,v ��.r[.•Ilc[ r••
v
... o. u
WASHINGTON CO. 1
/Caunuol co.co•.. �ottlo I_t, rs= o.l.IrwL= U� �.•t i —
JJJJ7 ••Ll caovl ��ou.os x7 //
/ I otaro.o I NENNE71N CO. 'i rooal•. .nl
......
1 /{— /) fA•nr I /t,
ro I�v A owaSLp/
us = Z„L 'i / xa I l 'f
1 IMO[1[w0(wC[ rw• ILrrOCT• �hOrd 1D UrTI(� ti L-
L01 U, ��.
✓ %� - ,t L I J03tvILLC c.,.JIY' ran:
I B..Tnv.h • ;f4
:0`D(w •rt ['•000 �3•SD •L[ L.AL �rf
ILOwc uaP� s Lt• I `ice 7,: r I I y(S aH
t: r•.r <— -• _ ` � /�,�.SJ AAMS2Y CO. L••EL.•0 �;
. r[.ro.w� 311 4��Iwr Lr :�
',��.ocLrr. +lMr. :.LSL- �L•=1 sL ums [cac%
tv
19 1
- - -- I isL [ohlr,aus ��tD•- r„L' -•' �J sr. � 4 u:ow
_ f01w• 171.r•.� r. uL
_ 6 �
�
- -� 4 11Cr /l[LO Ar0• • ^ . L\ +[r 0)f Yb
ALL r•wT 1 I (�� I ` I _ MClc MT1 Y. /ISM `•
I "� YICTO [IY LMAwr•tltw � ` L ,
.ArOCh I w.[.Dhy; �j r5 L•RtTDF�Y_L�
t2[.,
�COwI• I •aK1 '
I IwKS cPOr[
I CAAVER CO, CMASK• [LOO lAG•R M[IGMTs !.
I ,--
, COTTac[ G[OrI DEn•AR
- - - - -� Ch.S <AC OAK 'A CO. .1
Touwc r
Lf1 sr.ao. i :.
I CoLOCw I O.hLGp [h L_. I t•.•c[ 1 ��iii,/ G•
Jhy --ERIC' I 9(hrOM I I � I •rrl[Y•LLLT S0 :[rOY +T I h.h.hOiA '
I I LOu.ir.l :: I r L• <L /�nr. I ..f71 +cS I
S•h rash Cisc -0 iG�� I I I v[ArquOn
� - •hCOCa I Ipar[hh•'
i `s•wG CPy E. i S.. hG L•a[ I Cpl Ort � Fr).+C I r j I ••sn I
C r [R .i •., I Y(Slr —i L:L10+ I I
LA- SCOTT CO. I I I I I 1
1 Sr. I. A..w Ch C[I
t[uurla•t I I I r• I I I n (^j.i. Tntc
I I ..CT I I MA -;Wa
YL•,[LET I BELLE P% t I rIL[w• , CEO-A` L••E I cu*CRA I CASTLE POCK I I Kr[ •.11c
j v) al. ••)liT
.---TO- I DOUCL+S '
/Uj��yJ /n r -DO\r•
-,LS S :0 :S 20 33 I GP C[MY•LE Iw.rEPrpRO � I y
SCIOr.
METROPOLITAN
COUNCIL
Land Use Compatibility
The Council uses several strategies in coordinating implementation of airport and land use
planning activities, including resource management, long -term comprehensive airport
plans, land use compatibility guidelines for aircraft noise and major airport contingency
planning.
A long -term comprehensive airport plan is to serve as the main document for coordinating
airport planning, development and operations with local planning and development. The
plan is intended to integrate all the pertinent information and provide a regional process
for plan preparation and maintenance. For effective implementation of airport - community
plans, it is essential that all involved parties communicate, use and understand the same
information pertaining to their particular geographic area.
Regarding land use compatibility, the city should:
o Adopt the land use compatibility guidelines, make appropriate amendments to
their comprehensive land use plans and submit the amendments to the Council for
approval.
o Develop and implement appropriate local ordinances and codes. The city should
encourage compatible land uses near the airport by implementing the appropriate
building codes and zoning ordinances.
o Implement land use planning strategies to reduce, prevent or mitigate aircraft
noise impacts. In preparing or revising land use plans, the city should consider the
following strategies, where appropriate, to reduce or prevent incompatible uses
and to mitigate the impact of excess noise exposure:
a. Insulate structures located in noise- sensitive areas.
b. Adopt building noise attenuation standards for new construction, additions
or substantial rehabilitation.
C. Disclose degree of noise exposure to prospective home buyers.
d. Develop policies on the location, relocation and closing of public structures
in aircraft noise impact areas.
e. Development policies on the extension of utilities into aircraft noise impact
areas.
f. Zone or rezone property.
g. Redevelop appropriate areas.
C. Forecasts
New forecasts for air carrier and regional commuter service based on the 1989 Annual
Contingency Planning report are shown in Appendix B: New Baseline Forecasts.
Forecasts for general aviation are to be updated in 1990 based upon completion of the
Regional Reliever Airport Study.
APPENDIX A
CHECI:LIST FOR DETERMINING COMPLETENESS OF
MAJOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS:
REGIONAL AVIATION SYSTEM
1. Identify in what airspace policy area the community or development is located (existing
tall structure area, critical airspace, protection airspace, airport search area or other
airspace shown in Figure 11 of the airports policy plan).
2. Policies on the protection of a community's airspace (refer to AMIDOT notification
requirements).
3. Acknowledge whether community is within the Airport Influence Area (refer to police
plan or specific airport long -term comprehensive plan). Include maps of airport
property, aircraft noise zones, airport airspace zones, and Mn /DOT land use safety
zones.
4. Acknowledge whether a proposed development will impact airport communications /air
traffic operation through visual and /or electronic interference (refer to FAA reporting
form 7460).
5. Include guidelines for land use compatibility for aircraft noise (refer to appendix C in
aviation policy plan).
6. Include policies and aircraft noise attenuation programs reflecting the land use
compatibility guidelines (refer to appendix C).
7. Include a description of subdivision regulations and official controls to implement the
land use compatibility guidelines (refer to Council's model noise attenuation ordinance
and builders guide).
8. Include policies on location, relocation and siting of schools or public structures in
aircraft noise impact areas (refer to appendix C for aircraft noise zones).
9. Include policies on extension of utilities into aircraft noise impact areas and runway
land use safety zones.
H:'Jibrary =plliboompplanikjpOaM
1 =:9.89
16
Appendix B
1989 CONTINGENCY ASSESSMENT
BASELINE FORECAST ASSUMPTIONS
FACTOR
1995
2000
2005
2010
2020
ECONOMIC
Employment (000s)
1,677.6
1,782.6
1,861.1
1,943.5
2,119.3
Employment Elasticity
1.357
1.357
1.357
1.357
1.357
Per Capita Income (5)
7,815
8,215
8,634
9,074
10,024
Income Elasticity
0.31
0.33
0.35
0.37
0.37
Revenue per Passenger Mile
9.50
9.20
9.00
9.20
9.40
(cents)
Fare Elasticity
-0.476
-0.476
-0.476
-0.476
-0.476
O PERATI O NAL-AI R
CARRIER
Hubbing Ratio
2.20
2.30
2.40
2.40
2.40
Aircraft Size (seats)
150
163
169
174
174
Load Factor ( %)
55.9
56.9
56.9
56.9
56.9
Peak Month ( %)
8.94
8.94
8.94
8.94
8.94
Peak Hour of Peak Month
10.1
10.1
10.0
9.9
9.8
M
OPERATIONAL -
REGIONAL
Enplanements (000s)
738.0
924.0
1,133.0
1,368.0
1,939.0
Aircraft Size (seats)
31.9
38.0
38.0
38.0
38.0
Load Factor ( %)
55.9
56.9
56.9
56.9
56.9
OPERATIONAL - OTHER
SECTORS
Non - Schedule Domestic
3,906
4,494
5,272
5,994
8,012
(Operations)
International- Schedule and
1,126
1,508
1,972
2,392
3,588
Non - Schedule (Operations)
Air Cargo - Dedicated
12,200
13,800
15,000
15,000
15,800
(Operations)
Air Cargo - Small Express
11,200
13,200
14,600
14,400
15,600
(Operations)
General Aviation (Operations)
55,500
49,800
49,800
49,800
49,800
Military (Operations)
6,700
6,700
6,700
6,700
6,700
;i
AS ADOPTED BY THE
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
DECEMBER 21, 1989
AMENDMENT TO THE
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT GUIDE /POLICY PLAN
LIGHT RAH. TRANSIT ELEMENT
METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT GUIDE 1989
Metropolitan Council
Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth St.
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
October 1989
Publication No. 560 -89 -116
ABOUT THIS AMENDMENT
The Metropolitan Council is required by the regional transit legislation passed by the 1989 Minnesota
Legislature to amend its Transportation Development Guide/Policy Plan by January 1, 1990. Specifically,
the legislation states (Section 20):
"Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 473.146, by January 1, 1990, the Council shall revise
the light rail transit element of its transportation plan, taking into consideration all the
comprehensive plans and studies of corridors and preliminary design plans of regional railroad
authorities."
The attached proposed amendments have been prepared to respond to the legislation and the issues
identified prior to drafting the amendment. The following are highlights of the amendment:
1. While the plan amendment does not increase the number of light rail transit corridors in the
metropolitan transit system plan at this time, it includes a process for the Council to add
corridors if they meet the performance evaluation measures contained in the plan, upon
recommendation of the Regional Transit Board (RTB).
2. A maximum threshold of $4.00 per passenger total cost (annualized capital plus operating costs),
including supporting bus service, has been established for a corridor to be_ included in the 20-
year plan. This threshold is based on capital and operating subsidy thresholds of the regional
bus system.
3. Light rail transit plans need to include an equitable financial plan that draws on sources
consistent with the Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework and the transportation
funding principles of the 712nsportanon Development Guide /Policy Plan. A minimum level of
regional and/or local participation should be established, but whether the source is "regional" or
"local" is secondary to the need for equity in how funds are generated.
4. The staging of the regional system within the 20 -year time frame (to be determined by the RTB
in the development and financial plan) is to be based primarily on cost- effectiveness and
regional/local financial participation, along with implementation opportunities.
The results of the light rail transit development and financial plan and coordination plan must
be reflected in the Regional Transit Board's implementation plan to enhance coordination of
light rail and other regional transit services.
6. The inventory of recommended highway improvements has been clarified to specifically include
light rail transit as a potential improvement in the I -35W corridor south of downtown
Minneapolis.
The highway ranking process criterion for increasing people- moving capacity has been revised to
include light rail transit as an improvement eligible for points.
The first five changes above occur in Policy 2, Strategy C and Policy 10 of the RaMportation
Development Guide/Policy Plan. In addition, the metropolitan transit system plan element (Chapter 3)
has been revised to reflect the above changes. The sixth change and seventh changes are found in
Chapter 5 and Appendix E, of the policy plan, respectively.
[FROM SECTION 3, "POLICIES, STRATEGIES AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION "]
(page 16 of the Transportation Development Guide/Policy Plan)
[POLICY 21 STRATEGY C:
Light rail transit facilities, a viable option in the corridors identified in the transit system plan, should
serve the metro centers, should be initially limited to the fully developed area and should be
implemented in major transportation corridors where it makes cost- effective use of transportation
resources. The Council will use the following factors to evaluate light rail transit proposals: ridership
potential, concentrations of transit - dependent people, congestion relief on the metropolitan highway
system and overall cost - effectiveness as defined by the performance evaluation measures described below.
The financing of a regional light rail transit system should be based on a combination of federal, state,
and equitable regional and /or local sources consistent with the funding principles contained in Section 6
of this guide chapter and the Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework.
Discussion:
Light rail transit can be a high - quality and cost- effective transportation solution in heavily traveled
corridors. In order to be so, light rail transit should attract a large number of passengers including
transit - dependent people, have a positive impact on traffic congestion and achieve those objectives at a
reasonable cost per passenger carried. This strategy establishes an upper limit of $4.00 (in 1989 dollars)
as the maximum total capital and operating cost per transit rider. Corridors with costs above that
threshold should not be considered at this time beyond the comprehensive planning level and should not
be candidates for implementation before the year 2010. However, right -of -way preservation consistent
with Policy 16 and periodic reassessment of the corridors are appropriate.
In 1986 the Metropolitan Council conducted the Long Range Transit Analysis, which concluded that light
rail transit can be a viable option in six corridors in the region on the basis of the above general factors.
These corridors were therefore included in the 2010 metropolitan transit system plan. Since that time,
other corridors have been considered by county regional railroad authorities as part of their
comprehensive light rail transit plans. The Regional Transit Board is responsible for preparing a
development and financial plan for light rail transit based on the comprehensive light rail transit plans of
the counties. The Regional Transit Board may, as a part of the initial plan or subsequent amendments
to the plan, recommend additional light rail transit corridors to the Council, which will add them to the
metropolitan transit system plan if they meet the performance evaluation measures in this policy.
The introduction of light rail transit services in a corridor will affect the existing bus service. Bus service
may be eliminated, increased or reoriented to feed into the light rail transit line, and provide better
transit service within the corridor.. The benefits and costs of these bus service changes represent the true
light rail tranist impact on the overall transit system and should be included in the cost - effectiveness
analysis of light rail transit facilities.
As with other components of the transit system, it is appropriate to consider federal, state and regional
funding sources for the construction and operation of light rail transit. Light rail transit also provides
localized economic benefits. It could, therefore, be appropriately funded in part through local sources
such as benefit assessments, impact and joint development fees, property taxes or others. The regional
and /or local sources need to be equitable, regardless of whether they are locally or regionally
administered. Equitable funding sources are those that include contributions by those who most directly
and indirectly benefit from the improvement, also taking into consideration individual's ability to pay.
Performance Evaluation:
Light Rail Transit:
Cost- effectiveness measures:
a) Average annualized capital cost plus annual operating and maintenance cost not to
exceed $4.00 per passenger, including supporting bus service costs and ridership;
b) Projected total capital costs to be recovered equal to an all -bus alternative within the
economic life of the facility.
Impact on congestion levels because of significant auto diversions on parallel metropolitan
highway system.
Alignments that serve the greatest number of transit - dependent people in the corridor including
reverse commute access to suburban job opportunities.
A financial plan consistent with the Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework and the
funding principles in Section 6 of this guide chapter, and containing an established minimum
level of equitable regional and /or local participation in funding the improvement.
A staging plan based primarily on cost- effectiveness and an equitable financial plan including a
regional/local component, but also considering implementation opportunities.
POLICY 10
The Regional Transit Board must implement the transit component of the Metropolitan
Council's Transportation Development Guide /Policy Plan and include the elements and conform to
the format described in Appendix B: "Content Requirements for Implementation and Financial
Plans of the Regional Transit Board." The implementation plan must also reflect the light rail
transit development and financial plan and coordination plan.
Discussion:
The 1986 Metropolitan Governance Act, (Minn. Stat. Sec. 473.711) requires the Regional Transit Board
to implement the Council's policies, and ensure that its implementation plan and financial plans are
consistent with Council policy. The guidelines in Appendix B cover the implementation plan elements
the legislation requires, plus others the Council deems necessary. Appendix B also includes content
requirements for the Regional Transit Board's financial plan.
The 1989 Minnesota Legislature placed the responsibility to develop a regional light rail transit plan
with the Regional Transit Board. Because the implementation plan is a statement of comprehensive and
coordinated transit development for the region, it should reflect light rail transit staging in all
appropriate areas of the implementation plan.
Policies 1 to 10, 14, 15 and 18, the transit system plan, Appendix B and Appendix D compose the transit
policy plan. These policies and plan must be implemented by the Regional Transit Board's 1989
implementation plan and subsequent plans.
Ea
f�
[FROM SECTION 4, "METROPOLITAN TRANSIT SYSTEM PLAN, 2010 "1
(pages 37 -46 of the Transportation Development Guide/Policy Plan)
LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT SERVICES
Light rail transit is considered a viable component of the regional transit system because, in some
corridors, it can help achieve certain regional objectives more effectively than buses. These objectives
include:
Improving the cost- effectiveness of the regular -route transit system in particular and the
transportation system in general;
Reducing congestion and the need for additional highway facilities;
Providing better service to transit dependent people;
Allowing for intensification of development along major transportation corridors and in the
downtown areas.
The 1986 Long Range Transit Analysis concluded that light rail transit can be a viable transit option in
six corridors in the Metropolitan Area. This determination was based on an assessment of potential
light rail alignments throughout the regional against efficiency and effectiveness criteria reflective of the
above objectives. The six corridors were grouped in two priority categories based upon how well the
evaluation criteria were met:
First - Priority Corridors
Central Corridor (Between Minneapolis and St. Paul downtowns)
Minneapolis South Corridor
Second - Priority Corridors
- Minneapolis North Corridor (also known as the Northeast Corridor)
- Minneapolis Northwest Corridor
- Minneapolis Southeast Corridor
- Minneapolis Southwest Corridor
The above priorities reflect regional policies and objectives based on the Long Range Transit Analysis and
form the light rail transit component of the Council's 2010 metropolitan transit system. The term
"priority" reflects the degree to which the corridors meet regional objectives and They- should not be
construed as an implementation schedule for specific projects that are subject to funding opportunities
and constraints and socioeconomic impact reviews.
Additional Corridors
Additional corridors have been considered by county regional railroad authorities in their comprehensive
light rail transit system plans or other studies. The Regional Transit Board evaluates these additional
corridors as part of its light rail transit development and financial plan or review of a county
comprehensive light rail transit plan. The Regional Transit Board may recommend additional corridors
to the Council, which will add them to the metropolitan transit system if they meet the performance
evaluation measures in Policy 2.
Implementation and Staging Considerations
I
Implementation and staging of light rail transit corridors by 2010 will depend primarily on availability of
funding, completion of environmental and engineering studies to further ascertain the cost- effectiveness
of light rail transit on specific alignments and scheduling of complementary improvements such as
highway construction in the same right -of -way. While it is recognized that some of these factors may
cause a second -priority corridor to be constructed before a first- priority corridor, it is in the region's best
interest to ensure that sufficient funding be available for first -priority corridors when it becomes possible
to implement them.
Staging of the regional light rail transit system will be determined by the Regional Transit Board's light
rail transit development and financial plan, as mandated by the 1989 Minnesota Legislature. Because
federal, state and regional resources are limited, staging should be based primarily on the most cost -
effective use of resources.
Corridors that may be cost - effective for light rail transit in a 20 -year horizon may not be appropriate for
initial stages of system development. In corridors where ridership forecasts are based on fast- growing
population and employment levels rather than existing transit ridership, light rail transit may not be cost -
effective in initial stages of system construction. Light rail transit development plans should be
periodically reassessed in light of regional development trends ensure that the timing and location of
light rail transit implementation is cost- effective.
Further engineering and design studies are needed in each of the above corridors and those corridors
and extensions of corridors proposed by regional railroad authorities to refine the initial analysis
performed and further ascertain the cost - effectiveness of light rail transit on specific alignments. Certain
alignments in those corridors may be more efficient and effective light rail applications than others. The
Council will evaluate the cost - effectiveness of specific light rail transit proposals based upon the
evaluation indicators contained in Policy 2.
Cost - Effectiveness Considerations
Two factors in light rail development are critical in terms of cost - effectiveness: ridership and cost. The
cost- effectiveness of light rail in comparison to other transportation alternatives (including "doing
nothing ") is directly related to its ability to carry more people at an equal or lower cost while achieving
public policy goals. The cost- effectiveness of light rail transit increases when ridership increases and
total cost decreases. In general, cost - effective light rail applications will include selecting alignments
that:
- are efficient in reducing the overall operating cost of transit in a corridor, including feeder -bus
service and other remaining transit services;
- best serve transit - dependent populations;
- best reduce automobile traffic on the metropolitan highway system;
- are cost - effective in recovering the initial capital investment over the economic life of the light
rail facility.
All light rail transit proposals, including the six corridors already in the plan, must be compared to the
performance evaluation measures of Policy 2 using a consistent methodology before implementation
decisions are made. The level of analysis should be appropriate for what is likely to be one of the
largest public infrastructure investments in the region in the next 20 years.
4
The performance measures in Policy 2 provide the flexibility to compare first -stage segments of a
proposed light rail transit system with extensions of other corridors. Possible stages should be developed
within each corridor so that the regional light rail transit system can be developed to make the most
efficient use of resources.
The $4.00 per passenger performance evaluation measure represents a maximum threshold under which a
corridor should be considered for additional light rail transit study. Its basis is a $2.45 operating subsidy
adopted by the Regional Transit Board and Metropolitan Transit Commission in 1986. Regional transit
routes that can not meet this subsidy are not considered viable. Because the $2.45 represents a 1986
operating subsidy threshold and not total costs, incremental amounts were added to account for average
fare ($0.60), bus capital costs ($0.25 per trip), inflation ($0.34 per trip) and a margin for the uncertainty
of forecast estimates (an additional 10 percent, or $0.36 cents per trip).
The 10 percent allowance for uncertainty of estimates is included to acknowledge that the sketch
planning level of analysis used for county regional railroad plans to date, as well as the Council's Long -
Range Transit Analysis, is inherently imprecise. A corridor that is within the $4.00 threshold is afforded
an opportunity for more detailed study to see if capital and operating cost and ridership characteristics
can be refined to achieve a more cost effective LRT corridor. The $4.00 per passenger threshold should
not be interpreted as the point between "good" and "bad" LRT corridors, but as the point where
marginal corridors clearly no longer warrant study for implementation by the year 2010. LRT should be
implemented first where it will be most cost- effective, which is corridors where it achieves substanttially
less than $4.00 per passenger performance.
Ridership Implications
If effective light rail alignments on the six corridors currently in the plan are selected, overall ridership
on the regular -route transit system could be increased by as much as 10 percent, with nearly half of the
system ridership using light rail for at least a portion of the passenger's trip. However, if ineffective
alignments are selected, then there could be little or no additional transit ridership. It is estimated that,
with light rail in the six corridors listed above, the regular -route transit system in the region would carry
up to 94 million passengers per year by the year 2010. As many as six million additional riders could be
added if all other corridors proposed by county regional railroad authorities as of September 1989 are
implemented.
Effectiveness in ridership means serving existing riders better as well as attracting new riders from their
automobiles. Current transit patrons will account for about 70 to 80 percent of the ridership on a light
rail transit line. Without this base of existing riders, it would be difficult to attract enough persons from
automobiles in a given corridor to support a light rail line. Markets that will be good light rail markets
will already be good bus markets. However, a light rail line that draws its ridership only from existing
transit ridership on re- routed bus routes will have little impact on highway congestion, regardless of how
many riders it carries.
Cost Implications
One of the important contributions an effective light rail system can make to the region is the ability to
increase transit ridership without increasing the subsidy required to provide transit service.
Selection of specific alignments, a primary determinant of capital and operating costs, is currently the
responsibility of county regional railroad authorities. Since planning is still being conducted for the six
corridors, only general estimates of capital and operating costs can be made. Preliminary estimates
indicate that a six corridor system that achieves regional objectives and meets the regional performance
criteria can be built at a capital cost of approximately $725 million (1988 dollars) between $750 and
$850 million (1989 dollars). The capital cost of all corridors proposed by regional railroad authorities as
of September 1989 would be approximately $2 billion.
The impact of light rail on operating costs of the remainder of the regular -route system will depend on
the operating strategy for light rail transit and, more important, the ability of light rail transit to
optimize transit service in a corridor. An effective light rail alignment will permit restructuring of bus
service in the corridor to feed into the light rail transit system. If this is accomplished properly, the
savings from reoriented bus service could offset most or all of the additional operating costs of light rail
If light rail transit increases transit use in a corridor by 30 percent, but increases the operating costs of
transit (bus plus light rail) in that corridor by 50 percent, no efficiency is being gained in the regional
transit system. Conversely, duplication of bus and light rail service could result in high operating costs.
Table 1 reflects the magnitude of possible operating needs for transit services in general and service in
particular caused by potential light rail implementation. Efficient operating strategies, as discussed
above, could lower the operating costs per passenger from its current level of approximately $1.35.
However, inefficient strategies could dramatically increase operating costs of the system and threaten the
ability to meet transit service needs in other corridors of the region. For that reason, the region needs
to achieve prudent planning of light rail services.
Funding Imulications
A well - planned light rail system can protect the region from future expenditures. The potentially lower
operating cost of light. rail transit reduces the future impact of inflation on the transit operating budget
to the point where the savings eventually offset, the capital investment. However, this efficiency is lost if
extensive bus service reorientation to light rail transit lines results in a large increase in the overall
transit system operating deficit. Transit service levels in one part of the region should not be negatively
impacted by light rail transit implementation elsewhere.
An light rail transit system will require an annual capital investment larger than the $23 million needed
to maintain an all-bus system. However, operating efficiencies and the increased ridership level would
offset this larger initial investment if the system is -cost effective. The addition of capacity to the transit
system helps reduce the need for costly additions to the highway system, including the need for parking
structures in a land- constrained downtown area. The non - petroleum fuel source of light rail as well as
the higher capacity would help to reduce the impact of a gasoline shortage on the region's economy.
Numerous additional economic, environmental and other benefits are possible with light rail as a
component of the regional transit system, but the costs of achieving these benefits must be carefully
considered.
It is appropriate to consider sources ranging from the federal government to local and private- sector
sources. Transit, in general, and light rail transit in particular, can have benefits to federal and state
governments' economic efficiency and highway investment needs. Regional benefits include a more
efficient transportation system. Local benefits can include economic development and tax base increases
due to development opportunities and property value increases near stations.
The investment required for a regional light rail transit system will likely exceed the ability of the federal
and state governments to provide capital funding. It is therefore important that a share of regional/local
funding, commensurate with the amount of light rail investment required, be an explicit part of any
financial plan for the development of light rail transit in the region.
When determining the type of regional/local funding source, and the method of administration, attention
needs to be given to using sources that reflect the benefits of light rail transit. Funding should come
from sources that are equitable, consistent with the Metropolitan Development and Investment
Framework and the transportation funding principles in Section 6 of this guide. Whether sources are
considered "regional" or "local" is secondary to the equity in how funds are generated.
Equity in a funding source for light rail transit is achieved when the costs of the system are paid by
those who directly and indirectly benefit from the improvement, in proportion to the benefits received.
Furthermore, equity considers individual's ability to pay. While perfect equity may be impossible to
achieve, the funding sources selected should be as fair as possible in reflecting equity principles.
6
Coordination Implications
In 1987 the Minnesota Legislature placed primary responsibility for developing light rail transit on
regional railroad authorities formed by individual counties. The regional agencies (Metropolitan Council,
Regional Transit Board and Metropolitan Transit Commission) were given secondary roles in the
planning, designing and operation of light rail transit. The Council was directed to report to the
legislature on a recommended process to ensure coordination in planning and development by the
counties. The Council's report determined that sufficient coordination could occur through actions that
are contained in Strategy C of.Policy 6.
The report also suggested that if a public agency in the Metropolitan Area receives regional, state or
federal funds for light rail transit, the Council should be empowered to review and approve proposals to
ensure funds are spent in accordance with regional policies, plans and priorities. As currently
constituted, the Council's involvement will consist of its federal review authority, authority to review the
light rail transit development and financial plan and the implementation plan of the Regional Transit
Board.
The RTB implementation plan, discussed primarily in Policy 10 and in Appendix B, is a vehicle to
ensure good coordination among transit services and between transit and between transit services and
facilities and the Metropolitan Development Guide. Light rail transit implementation decisions must be
consistent with the implementation plan, and the implementation plan must reflect the integration of
light rail transit in regional service and finance areas.
One important implication of planning at a local rather than regional level involves project -level
coordination. Where light rail transit routes are planning in conjunction with highway improvements, it
is important for the regional railroad authority to participate in the planning and design along with the
appropriate highway agencies. Where a transit corridor extends between two counties, the region should
be involved to ensure that regional objectives for the corridor as a whole are achieved as well as local
objectives for the individual portions of the corridor.
7
[FROM SECTION 5, "METROPOLITAN HIGHWAY SYSTEM PLAN, 2010 "1
(page 59 of the Transportation Development Guide/Policy Plan)
Table 3
INVENTORY OF
RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS, 2010 HIGHWAY PLAN
(dollars In millions)
Length
Route Segment (miles) . Comment
1 -35W From 1-694 south to 1 -94 common 9.0 Meter, bypass ramps
section
• From 1 -94 common section south to 5.0 Add HOV lane or LRT line
CSAH 62
8
Cost
$ 180
120
190
30
40
15
60
15
16
600
60
10
18
55
5
59
From CSAH 62 south to TH 13
8.0
Add HOV lane or LRT line
• From TH 13 south to 1 -35E
2.0
Add HOV lane or LAT line
1 -35E
From 1-694 south to 1 -94
6.0
Meter, bypass ramps, spot improvements
• From Shepard Rd. south to TH 13
1.0
Spot problem resolution, widen bridge
1 -94
From 1-494 junction east to junction
16.0
Complete on o this bypass rrk underr way: costs adjusted)
with 1-694
• From CSAH 68 east to 1-494A-694
2.0
Add lanes
1-494
• From junction with 1 -94 south to 1 -394
8.0
Meter, bypass ramps
• From 1 -394 south to CSAH 18
9.0
Meter, bypass ramps, add HOV lane
• CSAH 18 to TH 100
.2.0
Meter, bypass ramps, add 2 lanes;
one of which is an HOV lane
• From Th 100 east to 34th Av.
4.0
Meter, bypass ramps, add 1 HOV lane
1-694
• From 1 -94 east to 1.35W
6.0
Add HOV lane (portions of this work
under way; cost adjusted)
TH 7
From TH 101 to the western boundary
6.0
Select capacity and safety inprovements based
Chanhassen
on resent study
TH 10
From TH 169 southeast to TH 610
9.0
Meter, bypass ramps
• From TH 610 southeast to 1 -35W
3.0
Build 4 -lane freeway according to EIS
TH 13
From 1 -35W east to CSAH 32
2.0
Complete 44ane section
Note: 'CSAH'
means County State Aid Highways. IT H* means Trunk Highway. 'HOV* means high-oocupancY vehide.
'EIS' means
environmental impact statement. Projects not in priority order.
8
Cost
$ 180
120
190
30
40
15
60
15
16
600
60
10
18
55
5
59
[FROM APPENDIX E, "HIGHWAY RANKING PROCESS "]
(page 89 of the Transportation Development Guide/Policy Plan)
Criteria:
B. Increase people- moving capacity of highways through transit and ridesharing.
(150 Points)
Criteria Measurement:
w- vs4&Wp
If planned improvements on a segment include ramp meters, high - occupancy vehicle (HOV)
bypasses and HOV lanes, or light rail transit, then it gets 150 points. If the segment has only
metered entrance ramps and HOV bypasses planned, then it gets 100 points. If the segment has
only metered entrance ramps, it gets 50 points. Non - controlled access roads do not get any
points under this criterion.
9
H. Transportation Policy Plan Amendments
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT GUIDEIPOLICY PLAN AMENDMENT
FOR LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT
The Metropolitan Council was required by the 1989 Minnesota Legislature to amend the light rail
transit elements of its Transportation Development Guide /Policy Plan to take into consideration
the comprehensive plans and studies that had been conducted by county regional railroad
authorities.
The primary effects of the amendment are to:
Establish a process for the Council to add corridors that meet the performance evaluation
measures contained in the plan, upon recommendation of the Regional Transit Board
(RTB).
Revise the performance evaluation measures and standards for a corridor to be included
in the 20 -year light rail transit plan, particularly a maximum $4.00 per passenger total cost
(annualized capital plus operating costs, including supporting bus service).
Require that light rail transit plans include an equitable financial plan that draws on
sources consistent with the Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework and the
transportation funding principles of the Transportation Development Guide /Policy Plan;,
including a minimum level of regional and /or local financial participation.
Require the staging of the regional system within a 20 -year time frame, as determined by
the RTB in its development and financial plan, to be based primarily on cost - effectiveness
and regional/local financial participation, along with implementation opportunities.
Require the results of the light rail transit development and financial plan and
coordination plan to be reflected in the Regional Transit Board's implementation plan to
enhance coordination of light rail and other regional transit services.
Clarify the inventory of recommended highway improvements to specifically include light
rail transit as a potential improvement in the I -35W corridor south of downtown
Minneapolis. In addition, the highway ranking process criterion for increasing people -
moving capacity has been revised to include light rail transit as an improvement eligible
for points.
No specific changes are required in local comprehensive plans as a result of this amendment.
However, as stated in the 1989 system statement for transportation, local communities are strongly
encouraged to participate with regional railroad authorities and the Regional Transit Board in
applicable planning activities. In particular, where LRT service is to be implemented cities should
prepare land use plans around stations to maximize the benefits to the city of access to the LRT
service and to minimize any incompatibilities.
me 1 nvrvi.i it%n
COUNCIL
ou are invited
take part in a
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
PLANNING FORUM
on the
LOCAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSE
TO THE 1989 SYSTEMS STATEMENT
Friday, June 22, 1990
8:30 a.m. to 9 a.m. Registration
9 to 11 a.m. Program
Metropolitan Council Chambers
The Metropolitan Council has mailed 1989 Metropolitan Systems Information Statement for aviation
and light rail transit planning to all local units of government in the Metropolitan Area.
Who is affected? Cities, townships and counties located in the seven -county Metropolitan Area.
Who should come? Local elected officials, administrators, managers, planners, consultants and
interested persons.
We will address:
• changes to the policy plans for aviation and light rail transit.
• amendments to the local comprehensive plans.
• changes in the Council's guidelines for reviewing amendments to local comprehensive
plans.
We will try to answer any questions you may have about the systems statement for your community.
Please contact Bernadine Scott at 291 -6500 to let us know if you plan to come.
Metropolitan Council
230 E. 5th St., St. Paul, MN 55101
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
PLANNING ASSISTANCE LOAN PROGRAM
PURPOSE
To assist local governments in the Metropolitan Area with activities related to implementation of the
Metropolitan Land Planning Act. Certain aspects of planning for long -term care of older and
disabled residents are also eligible for loan funds.
ELIGIBILITY
Any city, county or township located in whole or in part within the seven -county Metropolitan Area.
The local unit of government must have a locally approved comprehensive plan and implementing
ordinances on file with the Metropolitan Council.
AVAILABLE FUNDING
As of May 1, 1990, about $200,000 is available in the revolving program fund.
MAXIMUM LOAN AMOUNT
There is no dollar limit on loan requests, except overall fund availability. A local government may
apply for a loan of up to 75 percent of the cost of an eligible project.
TERM OF LOAN
Loans are interest free, for a term not to exceed three years.
APPLICATION PROCEDURES
Application forms with a non - refundable filing fee are submitted to the Metropolitan Council. The
filing fee is $100 for loans up to $15,000. For loans over $15,000, the filing fee is $150.
AWARD OF PLANNING ASSISTANCE LOANS
All loan requests will be evaluated and reviewed according to the program guidelines. After
Metropolitan Council approval, loans will be awarded by contract between the Council and the local
government.
FOR MORE INFORMATION
For a complete set of program guidelines, application forms or any further information, please call
Tori Flood (291 - 6621).
kjpW19/5.25.90
\, �btI POR -"'Vi��
IPPF
• RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS
WHEREAS, Stavnaz Canaku has made a caneet o6 coaching 600tbatt in the
Edina Schootz since 1959, and
WHEREAS, dun i.ng the p"t thiA ty -one yeau, o6 which twenty-nine o b them
being head - coach, h.i.6 jootba t teams have achieved 203 win6, 1 tie, and
69 tozzu , and
WHEREAS, Edina 600tbaU teams have paAt.ic.i.pated in 6 State TouAnament6,
and have won 5 State Champion.6h.ip6, and
WHEREAS, Coach Canaku has been named State Coach ob the yeah once, and
WHEREAS, Coach Canakeis haz been named ConAeAence Coach ob the VeaA twice,
and
WHEREAS, .suecus has come to Edina bootbatt team,6 in tange pant beca.u6e
o� the extre.a- ondinany ability and teadeAzhip o6 Coach Canaku and hus
.love oS and dedication to-the apoet o� 600tbat ;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Fnedehick S. R.icha&6, on behat6 of the Edina City
Couneit, do hereby extend heant6eY.t eongtatu2ation6 to
COACH STAVROS CANAKES
bon hiz outbtanding coaching accomptiAment6 and eommend6 him bon the
high standatds o6 ath2et.ie pnos.ic.i.ency and good .6pont6man.6hip cvs exempZi6.ied
by the teams he hays coached.
DATED th.i 6 j.vzt day o4 June, 1990.
r 1
ayan
EDINA PARK BOARD
7:30 p.m.
May 8, 1990
Manager's Conference Room
MEMBERS PRESENT: Bob Christianson, Pat Vagnoni, Bill Jenkins, Bill Lord,
Andrew Montgomery, Jean Rydell, Mac Thayer, Beth Hall, Cliff
Sour
MEMBERS ABSENT: Scott Johnson, James Fee
STAFF
PRESENT:
Bob
Kojetin, John
Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Janet Canton
OTHERS
PRESENT:
Jim
Moe, Mary Lou
Foster
1. APPROVAL OF THE APRIL 10, 1990 MINUTES
Jean Rydell MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE APRIL 10, 1990 MEETING.
Mac Thayer SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED.
2. EDINA BASEBALL ASSOCIATION
Jim Moe,. President of the Edina Baseball Association, gave a brief talk
about the Baseball Association. He indicated that this year there are 900
kids involved. The Association has seen an upgrade in the Jugball Program
(9 and 10 year olds) they have 300 kids participating. The Association is
very pleased with the numbers.
The Edina Baseball Association's Board has 19 volunteers and one paid
program coordinator. The coordinator basically works with the Jugball
Program and is also responsible for hiring and assigning umpires.
Mr. Moe indicated that this year they are a little short on sponsors.
Basically a sponsor is involved for a 3 year period and gives $400.00 each
year to the team for uniforms. The sponsors names are put on the uniforms
and they are listed in the program schedule. The question was asked if the
Association does any fund raising and Mr. Moe replied that they do not.
The only way the Association receives their funds is through fees and
sponsors. In addition, the Association also runs the concession stand out
at Braemar in the summer.
Mr. Moe indicated there was one thing he was concerned about at the parks
and that is First Aid. He stated that they do not have any ice on hand.
None of the parks have any quick first aid available and he was wondering
if this is anything that the Park Board might fund? Mr. Keprios indicated
that E.G.A.A. has a first aid bag for each team that is part of their
program.
/N
Mr. Moe also stated that not all of the other fields are maintained as well
as Braemar. There sometimes is a real problem with the fields especially
at Garden where there is a lip between the dirt and the grass: Mr. Moe
stated that this can cause a wild and potentially dangerous bounce. Mr.
Kojetin indicated that all fields including Braemar have this problem and
the Park Department tries the best they can to prevent this from
happening. This is an ongoing problem with any baseball field. He
explained as you maintain and drag a field you have a build up of in -field
mixture that goes into the sod. Each year a portion of the sod is cut to
eliminate this problem and by the end of the year there generally is a
build up again. This is a maintenance problem that is worked on through
the summer and also in the fall when the season is over with. It is
sometimes difficult to maintain this lip early in the spring because the•
high school teams are using the fields.
Mr. Moe indicated that there is no rake or equipment at the fields. He was
wondering if some equipment could be left at the fields and the coaches
could take turns working on the fields right before the games. Mr. Kojetin
indicated that storage is the most difficult problem. Mr. Kojetin
explained that equipment that is stored on site at local parks often get
vandalized or stolen. Mr. Kojetin questioned whether the coaches would
actually help maintain the fields.
Mr. Moe inquired if he could get more space for the association at the
Public Works building. Mr. MacHolda indicated that both soccer and
football also need more space and that Hockey is moving out of Public Works
and down to the Arena. The possibility of these three associations getting
more space will be looked into.
Mr. Moe asked the Park Board where they are on the centralized alcohol
program? Mr. Christianson indicated that at this point the Park Board is
receiving input from all of the associations on this issue.
3. DONATION OF PAMELA PARK LAND
Mr. Kojetin showed a piece of property at Pamela Park Lake where a resident
owns an outlot that he would like to donate to the City of Edina. Mr.
Kojetin indicated that all of the outlot is under water and none of the
property of the outlet at the present time is above water. The taxes in
1989 were $205.00. There are no special assessments on the piece of
property at the present time. Mr. Kojetin recommended that the Board
accept this piece of property at this time and recommend it to the City
Council. Chip Sour MOVED TO ACCEPT THE GIFT OF OUTLOT B IN LAKE PAMELA.
Jean Rydell SECONDED THE MOTION. Mr. Montgomery questioned what would
happen if the Park Board did not accept the property? Mr. Kojetin
indicated that it would probably be a piece of property that would go tax
forfeited and eventually would be brought to the City to accept as a tax
forfeited property at which time the Board would probably recommend to
accept it. MOTION CARRIED TO RECOMMEND THE GIFT OF.LAND TO THE CITY
COUNCIL.
2
4. FINAL JUPITER AND BEYOND REPORT
Mr. Kojetin indicated that the Park Board should now have a final
recommendation on the Jupiter and Beyond Report and forward it on to the
Planning Commission and the City Council for a final hearing. This would
then go for a hearing to the Planning Commission on May 30th and on to the
City Council on June 18th. The report also will be distributed to all
contiguous communities of Edina and also to all of the school districts
within the-City of Edina.. After it is final, the report will be part of
the comprehensive report of the City of Edina. Also, a copy of the report
will be forwarded to the Metropolitan Council. The survey which was done
in 1988 will not be made a part of this booklet because of the amount of
printing that would have to be done but it is referred to in the report
that the survey is on file at the Edina City Hall.
In the original presentation at the last Park Board meeting the capital
improvement sheets (the pink sheets) were tentatively recommended to be
brought back to this meeting for any changes for final approval. Mr'.
Kojetin distributed a green sheet which enclosed the same - information but
added to the next 5 year priority list $20,000 each year to the Capital
Improvement Budget. The Developer's Fund, which at present is about
$465,000, before the transfer of the Art Center 100,000, and the lights at
Van Valkenburg for $125,000, would leave approximately $200,000 in the
account.
Bill.Jenkins MOVED TO REFER THE JUPITER AND BEYOND REPORT TO THE PLANNING
COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACCEPTANCE. Mac Thayer SECONDED
THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED.
Mr. Christianson thanked everyone for their hard work on this report.
Jean Rydell MOVED TO REFER THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PRIORITIES LIST TO THE
CITY COUNCIL. Mac Thayer SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED.
5. CAHILL INTERPRETATIVE PARK
Mr. Kojetin indicated that there is going to be an interpretative site at
Cahill and 70th Street which is the old church site. The Heritage
Preservation Board and Historical Society have recommended to remove the
church.
The Heritage Preservation Board and Historical Society have recommended
that they would like to see some type of interpretative site on this corner
showing the early settlement of the 70th and Cahill corner. The developer
met with staff and the Historical Society to come.up with some type of plan
for an interpretative site. Mr. Kojetin then showed some renderings of
interpretative sites for the corner. These renderings have gone to the
Historical Society and Heritage Preservation Board for their final
approval.
At this time, Mr. Kojetin would like to have the Park Board make some type
of recommendation on one of the three renderings and one of the three
locations that the Park Board would like to see happen at the 70th and
Cahill corner. Mr. Kojetin gave a brief description of the renderings and
3
locations and asked for a consensus vote on which one they liked the most.
After a vote of the Park Board, Site B was recommended as first choice and
monument rendering B as the first choice. Mr.. Kojetin indicated that the
cost for this Interpretative site would be approximately $25,000 which
would be from the Developer's Fund, which will be funded by the new
development at this corner. The final amount from the Developer's Fund for
this site has not been determined as of yet but would be more than $25,000.
6. OTHER
E.G.A.A. - Mr. Keprios stated that he was asked by the E.G.A.A. to forward
their complaint of the janitors' lack of service at some of the schools,
and specifically Concord Elementary. Mr. Jenkins asked what can we do
about this? Mr. Christianson said that really the only thing we can do is
let our feelings be known to the School Board. Mr. Keprios was hoping that
Mr. Johnson would be at this meeting to discuss it with him.
Van Valkenburg Dedication - The Dedication of Van Valkenburg fields will be
May 17th at.7:30 p.m. The Agenda will be: 7:30 Mayor Richards; 7:35 Mr.
Christianson; 7:40 Ribbon Cutting, Jim Van Valkenburg; 7:45 throw first
ball. There will be refreshments and cake. Mr. Christianson indicated he
would.like to throw on the switch for the lights.
Tennis Courts - Mr. Montgomery brought up the fact that the Normandale
Tennis Courts are in very poor shape. Mr. Keprios indicated that in 1986
we had four sets of tennis courts resurfaced by a contractor who had the
lowest bid. Because of the poor weather conditions of ice and rain this
early spring it caused a flaking off of large chunks of the courts that
were resurfaced in 1986. The contractor in 1986, Deephaven Courts, did a
terrible job and unfortunately those problems do not surface for over a
year and by that time the warranty was over. Deephaven Courts, Inc. has
since gone out of business. Mr. Keprios indicated that this year there
are 8 out of 16 sets of courts that are in need of resurfacing.
The courts in need of resurfacing are:
1. Normandale*
2. Todd*
3. Walnut Ridge*
4. Braemar
5. Creek Valley
6. Lake Cornelia Pool
7. Lake Edina
8. Yorktown
*These courts were resurfaced by Deephaven Courts, Inc. in 1986.. Utley
Park tennis courts were also resurfaced by Deephaven Courts, Inc. in 1986
and had to be resurfaced again in 1989.
Because of this flaking problem, it is a must that we do something with
these courts because they are unplayable in some areas. Mr. Keprios also
stated that there is also a liability at some of these courts because of
their dangerous condition. The Board's discussion centered around
recommending to the City Council to allocate additional funds for
4
resurfacing four additional sets of courts (2 tennis courts per set) this
year. Mr. Keprios indicated that it would be approximately $10,000 to
$15,000 to redo these additional eight courts but there is no money in the
capital or operating budget. The Park Board felt that if this is a
liability for the courts maybe the Park Board should recommend to the City
Council for $10,000 to $15,000 from the Developer's Fund or whatever other
possible fund so as these courts can immediately be done this summer.
Andrew Montgomery-MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT MONEY BE
APPROPRIATED__ TO_ RESURFACE THE TENNIS COURTS DUE TO CIRCUMSTANCES OF WEATHER
BUT NOT TO EXCEED $15,000.00. Bill Lord SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION
CARRIED.
Different Parks - Mr. Keprios indicated that the Basketball Association has
shown an interest to donate money for a new outdoor basketball court at an
outside facility at one of Edina's local Parks. The newly rebuilt
basketball court at Countryside looks great and has become an inspiration
for the E.B.A. to donate money to construct another outdoor court in the
City.
Also, the Soccer Association has indicated that they wish to donate some
funding for sod at the Braemar Football /Soccer Field.
Edina Realty is interested in possibly donating funds to upgrade playground
equipment at Cornelia Park.
Swimming Pool - Mr. Kojetin indicated that they have hired a consultant to
study the swimming pool for immediate needs and also an overall study if
the pool needs to be reconstructed.
Centennial Lakes - Mr. Kojetin gave a short overview of the Centennial
Lakes Park project. At the last Council meeting they awarded three
contracts to start construction at Centennial Lakes.
One contract is for the construction of the park pavilion building. The
second construction is the main park on the west side of Central park
portion. The third contract is for the north lake sodding and irrigation
on the east side of the central park and north park area. It is hoped
construction will start the first part of June and be completed sometime
around the first of the year. At this time, it is thought that the plant
material will not totally be planted until the Spring of 1991.
7. NEXT PARK BOARD MEETING
It was recommended that at the next Park Board meeting the members take a
tour of some of the different parks and facilities.
8. ADJOURNMENT
Jean Rydell MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 9:05 P.M. Bill Jenkins
SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED.
5
4612 Casco Ave.
Edina, MN 55424
May 22, 1990
Mr. John Schirmang
Chief Building Official
Edina City Hall
4801 W. 50th St.
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mr. Schirmang:
In December 1988, we experienced a disservice by an unlicensed plumber, Dennis
Olson, who advertised as serving Edina. The work was totally unsatisfactory
and required repair by a competent plumber.
We sought restitution but more importantly, wished to notify the authorities,
in our community, concerning this incident. Mr. Carl Shannon, the Edina City
Mechanical Inspector, was immediately responsive and indicated that this
individual was known to be incompetent. He offered to support us in our
efforts, through the Hennepin County Small Claims Court, for restitution. We
received a judgment in our favor. Our efforts to collect the judgment failed
repeatedly.
Mr. Shannon was persistent in pursuing this individual who is known to have
Performed sustandard work in our community. -When he discovered that Mr. Olson
was working in Edina, he confronted him, traced his current employer and
notified me immediately. Our previous efforts had resulted in our being told
that due to an automopbile accident, Mr. Olson was no longer able to work nor
did he have any assets. Due to Mr. Shannon's persistence and integrity, it
appears that thirteen months after the judgment was declared, we may begin to
collect. We are impressed and appreciative of Mr. Shannon's unfailing efforts
on our behalf and believe that his commitment to service must be recognized
and commended.
Sincerely,
Katherine Gamble
(Mrs. Wm. G.)
.All
U.
440
as ociation of
me�ropoIitan
municipalities
BULLETIN
May 30, 1990
TO: Member City Officials
FROM: rry Bakken, President
RE: AMM LEGISLATIVE POLICY COMMITTEES
HELP DETERMINE THE AMM'S LEGISLATIVE POLICIES FOR THE NEXT
BIENNIUM: We, as city officials, cannot afford to sit on the
sidelines and be silent. There are many critical issues facing our
cities now and we must let the Legislature know what we think are
the best solutions. We can do this by participating in the AMM's
Legislative Policy Development Process as a member of one of the
AMM's Policy Committees.
The Committees will start meeting the week of July 30th. - August
3rd. and will have a total of .4 or 5 meetings each and will finish
by no later than September 15th. Please read 'Attachment A' for a
brief description of the five standing policy committees.
ACTION NEEDED TO BECOME A MEMBER:
1. If you were a member of a policy committee last year (1989)
and wish to continue as a member of that same committee, no
action on your part is needed. (You will automatically be
continued as a member.)
2. If you were not a policy committees member last year but want
to be a member, please fill out the attached form (on back of
Attachment A) and return to Carol Williams, AMM, 183
University Ave., East, St. Paul, MN. 55101.
3. If you were a Policy Committee member last year but would like
to change to a different committee, please call Roger Peterson
or Vern Peterson at 227 -4008 and indicate your new committee
choice.
THE BOARD WILL BE MAKING THE APPOINTMENTS IN LATE JUNE SO PLEASE
MAKE YOUR INTENTIONS KNOWN BY NO LATER THAN JUNE 21, 1990.
LAST CHANCE FOR RTB ADVISORY COMMITTEE:
Two earlier AMM Bulletins (March 21 and April 10) requested that
183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227 -4008
L 1-1
interested City Officials (both elective and administrative)
volunteer to serve on this very important Advisory Committee which
is about to be established by Mike Ehrlichmann, RTB Chair. Mike
made a personal appeal at our May 16th. AMM Annual Meeting for
more volunteers and indicated that he places a very high priority
on establishing such a committee. Our office has received the
names of several officials but more volunteers are needed from
throughout the area especially from Dakota, Washington, and suburban
Hennepin Counties.
IF YOU OR SOMEONE FROM YOUR CITY WOULD LIKE TO BE A MEMBER OF THIS
COMMITTEE, PLEASE CONTACT EITHER ROGER PETERSON OR VERN PETERSON IN
THE AMM OFFICE WITHIN THE NEXT COUPLE OF WEEKS (227- 4008).
DISTRIBUTION NOTE:
This Bulletin has been mailed to member Mayors, Councilmembers and
Managers /Administrators individually. We would appreciate it
if the City Manager or Administrator would duplicate and provide
copies of this bulletin to other city employees who might like to
serve on a policy committee.
Thank you.
Y
1.
2.
3.
4.
ATTACHMENT A
AMM LEGISLATIVE POLICY COMMITTEE DESCRIPTIONS
METROPOLITAN AGENCIES COMMITTEE
Considers legislative issues and other policy issues related
to the Metropolitan Council and Metropolitan Agencies. The
Committee monitors the structure and relationship between the
regional entities and local units of government and reviews
amendments to Metropolitan Development Guide Policy Chapters or
any new chapters developed. The Committee has previously developed
policy on land use planning, metropolitan significance, solid waste
management, Met Council selection process, etc. It also reviews
the Council's yearly budget.
MUNICIPAL REVENUES COMMITTEE
Considers any matter concerning city revenues, property taxes, and
city expenditures. Including state aid formulas, state aid
dollars, levy limits, property tax assessments, fiscal disparities,
etc. The Committee will be looking very carefully at the effects of
the 1990 omnibus tax bill as well as net tax capacity rates and the
balance of aids /credits among regions of the state.
HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Considers all issues related to economic development and housing
including subsidized housing, affordable housing, and activities of
the Metropolitan HRA. Reviews all amendments to the Metropolitan
Council's Housing Guide Policy Chapter with particular emphasis on
low and moderate income housing concerns. Will review proposals
dealing with EDA's, HRA's, Tax Increment Financing (TIF) and
Development authorities.
TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
Considers all major issues related
transportation including funding sc
The ten (10) elected officials who
Transportation Advisory Board (TAB)
officials who represent the AMM on
(TAC) are encouraged to be members
other city officials.
5. GENERAL LEGISLATION COMMITTEE
to air and surface
urces at all governmental levels.
represent the AMM on the
and the eight (8) city staff
the Technical Advisory Committee
of this Committee along with
Considers other issues which have impact on metropolitan area
cities outside the scope of other AMM committees. In the past,
this Committee developed policy on municipal self insurance,
municipal consolidation, pensions, cable communications, PELRA
Amendments, Comparable Worth, etc.
PW\
(Please return by not later than June 21st.)
NAME CITY TITLE
CITY
PREFERRED MAILING ADDRESS
(street)
(city) (zip code)
PREFERRED TELEPHONE CONTACT NUMBER
PLEASE INDICATE COMMITTEE CHOICE
(1ST. AND 2ND.)
�] Municipal Revenues
Metropolitan Agencies
Housing and Economic Development
General Legislation
Transportation
SUGGESTED ISSUES TO BE STUDIED
PLEASE RETURN TO:
Association of Metropolitan Municipalities
183 University Ave., East
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Att: Carol Williams
c
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD
TUESDAY, APRIL air, 1990, AT 7:30 P.M.
MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM, EDINA CITY HALL
MEMBERS PRESENT: Gary Nyberg, Marilyn•Curtis, David Gepner, Walter Sandison,
Cy Stuppy, and Lois Wilder
MEMBERS ABSENT: Donald Wray
.STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES:
Gary Nyberg moved for approval of the minutes from November 29, 1989, Lois
Wilder seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried.
II. INTRODUCTION OF NEW MEMBERS:
Joyce Repya introduced Mrs. Marilyn Curtis, 4400 West 50th Street and Mrs.
Walter Sandison, 4612 West 58th Street as the newest members of the Heritage
Preservation Board, having replaced Mr. Gordon Stuart and Mr.. John Metil.
III. ELECTION OF OFFICERS:
Ms. Repya opened the floor to nominations for Chairman. Lois Wilder nominated
Gary Nyberg. David Gepner seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried.
Gary Nyberg nominated Lois Wilder for Vice Chairman. Ms. Wilder respectfully
declined the nomination due to commitment conflicts.
Cy Stuppy then nominated David Gepner for Vice Chairman. Gary Nyberg seconded
the motion. All voted aye; motion carried.
IV. CAHILL SETTLEMENT COMMEMORATION:
Ms. Repya advised the Board that Ron Clark, Inc. the developer of the old St.
Patrick's /Wooddale Montessori site has presented to the City Council, three
ideas for an interpretive center highlighting the historic Cahill Settlement.
They also proposed three possible location for the center.
The City Council has asked the Heritage Preservation Board to review the
proposed sites and design plans, and to make recommendations as to the most
desirable.,
Reviewing the proposed site locations, Ms. Repya explained that three sites have
been identified as possible locations for the proposed interpretive center. The
first site is situated on the southeast corner of Cahill Road and West 70th
Street. The site is zoned commercial and houses the old Kings Court Building
which is currently being refurbished. A parking lot serves the commercial uses
on the site, however, sidewalks do not serve the site at this time.
The second site is located on the southwest corner of Cahill Road and West 70th
Street, which is the northeast corner of the townhouse development. Sidewalks
serve both West 70th Street and Cahill Road, however, no on- street parking is
allowed.
The third site, Ms. Repya pointed out, is located on the southeast corner of the
townhouse development, at the northwest corner of Village Drive and Cahill Road.
Sidewalks serve only Cahill Road, and on- street parking is allowed on the north
side of Village Drive.
Mr. Nyberg opened the Board's discussion by expressing his opinion that the
second site, on the southwest corner of Cahill and West 70th Street was best
suited to house the interpretive center from a visibility standpoint, and
because of its relationship to the original St. Patrick's church site.
Mr. Nyberg pointed out that he felt the Kings Court site lacked adequate
visibility from West 70th Street and Cahill Road, and possessed a downward
sloping grade from the road that would not be compatible with any of the
proposals.
Addressing the third possible location on Cahill Road at Village Drive, Mr.
Nyberg explained that he felt this site would not provide adequate visibility
adding that an interpretive center would be lost on this site.
General discussion ensued relative to all the proposed locations. Mr. Stuppy
stated that he agreed with Mr. Nyberg's analysis of the sites and moved to
recommend the second site on the southwest corner of Cahill and West 70th as the
most desirable location to house an interpretive center. Lois Wilder seconded
the motion. All voted aye; motion carried.
Addressing the proposals for the interpretive centers, Ms. Repya explained that
Plan "A" proposed a crescent shaped retaining wall built into the berm. A hedge
would outline the center on top of the berm, followed by a boulder retaining
wall, an elevated planter, and finally, a wall consisting of the concrete block
from the St. Patrick's foundation on which five bas relief plaques, highlighting
the Cahill settlement would be displayed. Additionally, a bench also
constructed of the church foundation blocks is proposed to face the plaques,
affording visitors a place to rest and reflect.
Plan "B ", Ms. Repya stated)is also proposed to be built into the berm. A hedge
row would accent the upper level followed on down with a boulder wall, and a two
foot planting bed atop a low wall with a ledge for seating. The highlight of
this scheme is an obelisk shaped structure, constructed of the foundation blocks
from the church. Each side. of the structure would include a plaque explaining
the history of the Cahill School, store, St. Patrick's Church and the Irish
community. The roof would be constructed of pre -cast concrete, fashioned to
resemble the steeple of the original church.
The third proposal, Plan "C ", Ms. Repya explained like the other two, would be
built into the berm. The crescent shaped design would be outlined by a hedgerow
along the top and sides followed by a retaining wall, incorporating the concrete
block from the church foundation. The same bas relief plaques proposed in the
other plans would be attached to the wall. At the base of the display wall, a
planter is proposed behind a final low wall which would also provide seating.
Chairman Nyberg explained to the Board that while no formal action would be
taken as to the most desirable design plan, the Board's comments and preferences
would be relayed to the Planning Commission and City Council. Mr. Nyberg then
proceeded to state that he was pleased that the developer has taken the
responsibility to propose the designs for the interpretive center, and to see
the incorporation of the foundation blocks from St. Patrick's church in all the
plans.
Mrs. Wilder agreed with Mr.Nyberg, however, expressed concern that perhaps the
intent of the Board -- was misunderstood in the developer's proposals to include
the "concrete" foundation blocks from the church.
Mrs. Wilder went on to explain that the historically significant foundation is
that from the original 1888 church. At present, the material is unknown; it
could be limestone slabs, or field stone, but until the foundation is excavated,
it is an unknown entity.
Mr. Nyberg also pointed out that until the original foundation is discovered,
and its condition determined, it would be difficult to dictate how and where it
could best be incorporated into the design of the center. Board members agreed
with Mr. Nyberg, pointing out that the concrete foundation blocks are mos.t
likely part of the 1924 reconstruction of the church.
Expressing their preferences for the three proposed design plans, five of the
six members present (Chairman Nyberg, Mrs. Curtis, Mr. Gepner, Mr. Sandison and
Mr. Stuppy) favored Plan "B" with the obelisk structure as the central focal
point. Design Plan "C" was their second choice with the plaques displayed on a
retaining wall visible from the sidewalk or street. The sixth member of the
Board, Mrs. Wilder explained that she favored Plan "C" as the most visible and
historically fitting of the proposals, with plan "B" as her second choice.
All the Board members agreed that Plan "A" lacked the visibility and impact they
would like to convey with an interpretive center.
David Gepner asked who would be responsible for the maintenance of the
interpretive center. The Board agreed that the City's Park Department would be
responsible for maintenance as they are at the mill site and the Tupa Historical
Park.
Following a brief discussion regarding the plans, Chairman Nyberg stressed that
while the Board has expressed their preferences for the proposals presented, the
Board agrees that the best design for the center is dependent upon the discovery
of the original 1988 foundation materials.
The Board members added that the developer should be commended for the
thoughtfullness, creativity and originality that went into the proposals.
V. HISTORIC MARKERS:
Ms. Repya advised the Board that the Historical Marker Program was begun in 1976
as a part of the U.S. Bicentennial. At that time, a subcommittee of the
Historical Society designated the following locations as worthy of
identification:
1.
Cahill Community
5.
Country Club District
2.
Grimes House
6.
Old Cahill School
3.
Edina Mill Site
7.
Minnehaha Grange Hall
4.
Morningside Community
8.
Edina Mills Community
Through the work of the Bicentennial Commission, the City was awarded a $3,000
matching grant from the Minnesota Americas Revolution Commission for the
fabrication and installation of the historic markers which were to include the
City logo, Bicentennial symbol, and a short description of each site.
After the Bicentennial year, the Commission was disbanded, and the
responsibilities for the historical marker program was passed down to the
Heritage Preservation Board.
Ms. Repya explained that she has reviewed the minutes from the Heritage
Preservation Board which show that discussions relative to the historic markers
took place in 1977, 1984, and then annually until 1987. During those ten years,
easements were granted to allow for placement of the signs on historic private
property, however, the actual fabrication and installation of the signs never
took place.
Responding to a question relative to the status of the Bicentennial Grant Funds,
Ms. Repya stated that those funds, as well as monies collected from the sale of
the book History and Architecture of Edina. Minnesota total approximately
$1,000.00 and are kept in the City's general fund.
At this time, Ms. Repya explained, the Park Department has commissioned the
fabrication and installation of two signs; one for the Grange Hall and one for
the Old Cahill School. The signs are 3'6" X 3'6" double faced sandwich panel of
1/4" Lexan over a 5/8" plastic plywood core. The signs will include text
pictures and will stand 6 feet high, supported by anodized aluminum posts -
The bid for these signs was awarded to Nordquist Sign Company for the cost of
$2,350.00 per sign, or $4,700.00 total.
Discussion ensued relating to the cost of the signs and the construction
materials. Members agreed that the signs were warranted, but wondered if one
sign wouldn't service both the Grange Hall and Cahill School. (one building per
sign face), thus freeing up the second sign for the Country Club District.
Ms. Repya explained that the Purchase Order had already been completed for the
signs, so the likelihood for changes was slim. However, she indicated that she
would check with Bob Kojetin, the Park Director to see if they had any plans for
identifying the Country Club District in Wooddale Park,
Mrs. Lois Wilder advised the Board that she was a member of the original
Bicentennial Historic Marker Committee and felt is was a shame, after all the
work and research that went into the program, that the Bicentennial signs never
became a reality. She went on to point out that for a property to be
historically identified, either by National Register designation or Historic
Overlay Rezoning is not enough without clearly identifying those properties to
the public by the means of a sign or marker of some kind.
Mrs. Curtis agreed with Mrs. Wilder, pointing out that many of the Edina
residents are unaware of the rich history in our community. Ms. Curtis also
advised the Board that her home, the Baird House, received a small yard sign in
1986 for the home's 100th anniversary. The sign has since deteriorated to the
point that it has been removed.
Discussion ensued relative to the historic properties that are presently clearly
identified. The Board agreed that the Mill Pond, Cahill Community, Grange Hall
and Cahill School have all been, or are in the process of being well marked.,
Conversly-,- the Country- Club - District, and the Grimes, Baird and Peterson houses
are not identified as historically significant to the general public.
The Board agreed to continue the pursuit of clearly labeling the historic
properties in the City. Ms. Repya agreed to investigate future plans the Park
Department might have for identifying historic sites. No formal action was
taken.
VI. RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION:
Ms. Repya read the resolution prepared to commend Mr.. Gordon Stuart for his
thirteen years of service to the Heritage Preservation Board.
David Gepner, moved approval of the resolution. Walter Sandison seconded the
motion. All voted aye; motion carried.
VII. OTHER BUSINESS:
A. David Gepner advised the Board that May 15, 1990, is ride your bike to work
day. He added that bicyclists would like to be identified as part of the
transportation system. Bicycles don't pollute, the need for parking spaces
would be reduced, and people would be healthier. No action taken.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT:
Lois Wilder moved for adjournment. Cy Stuppy seconded the motion. All voted
aye. Motion carried.
Joyce Repya
JOHN KEEFE �QIla oQ PHONE
COMMIS31ONER �� j �'.a 348 -3087
- 1
ts� �
DIVE
BOARD OF. HENNEPIN COUN'T'Y COMMISSIONERS
A -2400 GOVERNMENT CENTER
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55487 -0240
May 31, 1990
Kenneth E. Rosland
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Ken:
I received your letter and resolution regarding the Fairview
detox center in Eden Prairie. I appreciate your concern about
this problem.
First of all, I did not support the selection of Mission Care as
the suburban detox center, mainly because I knew that it would
create problems for Edina. I was the only dissenting vote.
As you know, the county felt that they had to make a cut in the
detox services that were being offered in the suburbs. Both
programs were given the opportunity to put a program together
within the budget constraints. Both facilities said that they
could not do this. Both programs came in at basically the same
daily rate, with the exception that Mission Care included trans-
portation from local police stations, which the Board felt was
important given the geographical location. In total, only about
three beds were cut from suburban detox.
Perhaps this can be considered in the upcoming budget ".meetings,
but I do not feel that the Board would be receptiVe to taking
$300,000 from contingency at this time to continue another detox
center.
Very t ul y yours,
John Keefe
Commissioner