HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-07-16_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
JULY 16, 1990
ROLLCALL
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA MEETING OF JULY 2, 1990
II. AWARD OF BID - POWER SWEEPER - CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK (Continue to 8/6/90)
III. ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS All agenda items marked with an asterisk (a)
and in bold print are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one
motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Council
Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will' be removed from the
consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda.
* II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of the Regular Meetings of June 4, June 18 and July 2, 1990
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing.
Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote
of all members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property
Zoned.Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass.
* A. Preliminary Plat Approval - Lindell Addition, Lot 1, Block 1, Danen's
Meadows - 7017 Antrim Road (Continue to 8/20/90)
* B. Amendment to Edina Comprehensive Plan - Community Facilities Element -
Park Plan (Continue to 8/20/90)
IV. ORDINANCES First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second
Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of all members of- Council
required to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of
all members of Council required to pass.
A. First Readin
1. Ordinance No. 312 -A2 - To Delare Certain Animal Noises to be a Public
Nuisance
2. Ordinance No. 715 -A1 - To Provide Mandatory Separation and Storage of
Recyclables from Planned Residence Districts and Mixed Development
Districts in the City
3. Ordinance No. 1301 -A5 - To Require Garbage and Recycling Haulers to
Offer Recyclable Collection Service and to Provide Recycling Reports
V. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
A. Joyce G. Anderson, 7121 Glouchester Ave - Home Occupation
VI. AWARD OF BIDS
* A. Storm Sewer Improvement Nos. STS -207 and STS -208
Agenda
Edina City Council
July 16, 1990
Page 2
VII. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Approval of Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of July 10, 1990
B. Appointment to Community Health Services Advisory Committee
C. MTC Route 36 - Proposed Discontinuance of Bus Service
D. Park Board Recommendation - National Bantam Hockey Tournament
E. Edina Foundation - Appointments and Proposed Board Changes
VIII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS
A. Petition for Sidewalk - Ridgeview Drive
IX. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
X. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
XI. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
XII. FINANCE
A. Public Hearing - Proposed Issuance of $6.850.000 Multifamily Mortgage
Revenue Refunding Bonds (Vernon Terrace Project)
1. Resolution Authorizing Issuance of Multifamily Mortgage Revenue
Refunding Bonds
B. Payment of Claims per Check Register dated 07/16/90: Total $2,693,848.33
and for confirmation of payment of Claims per Check Register dated
06/30/90: Total $784,361.63
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Mon Aug 6 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room
Mon Aug 20 Joint Meeting - Council /Building Construction 6:00 p.m. Mgrs Conf Rm
Appeals Board
Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room
Thurs Aug 23 Budget Hearing 5 -7 p.m. Mgrs Conf Rm
Tues Aug 28 Budget Hearing
Wed Aug 29 Budget Hearing
Tues Sept 4 Regular Council Meeting
Tues Sept 11 PRIMARY ELECTION
Mon Sept 17 Regular Council Meeting
5 -7 p.m.
Mgrs
Conf
Rm
5 -7 p.m.
Mgrs
Conf
Rm
7:00 p.m.
Mgrs
Conf
Rm
Polls open 7 a.m. - 8 p.m.
7:00 p.m. Mgrs Conf Rm'
MINUTES
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
JULY 2, 1990
Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Chairman
Richards.
MINUTES of the Joint HRA /Council Meeting of June 4 and HRA Minutes of June 18,
1990 were approved as submitted by motion of Commissioner Kelly, seconded by
Commissioner Smith.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus,.Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR PROJECT SIGNAGE - CENTENNIAL LAKES Manager Rosland explained that
the bid is for the fabrication and installation of project identification signs
for Centennial Lakes Park. Motion was made by Commissioner Rice for award of bid
for project signage - Centennial Lakes Park to recommended low bidder, LeRoy
Signs, at $8,215.00. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the HRA
Meeting adjourned.
Executive Director
in
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
JUNE 4, 1990
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice and Mayor Richards.
KIDS CLUB 10TH ANNIVERSARY PROCLAIMED Mayor Richards read the following
Proclamation which was adopted unanimously:
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, Edina Kids Club is celebrating ten years of before and after - school child
care to the children of Edina; and
AREAS, Edina Kids Club has grown from a staff of five serving 50 children to a
staff of 40 serving 500 children; and
WHEREAS, Edina Kids Club's Stated Mission is to provide highest quality,
affordable care and enrichment programs to Edina's school age children; and
WHEREAS, Edina Kids Club was the first school -age child care program in Minnesota
to be accredited by the National Academy of Early Childhood Programs; and
WHEREAS, Edina Kids Club is a pioneer in the development of extended day
enrichment programs, including RALLY, Prime Time and Kinder Play; and
WHEREAS, Edina Kids Club is served by Director Linda Sisson who is listed as one
of five leading authorities on school -age child care by the National Association
for the Education of Young Children; and
WHEREAS, Edina Kids Club is served by a Parent Advisory Council that has been
cited by the Minnesota Department of Education as an outstanding example of
effective parent involvement in policy development and program evaluation; and
WHEREAS, Edina Kids Club is a safe, happy, enriching environment where children
have fun.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Frederick S. Richards, Mayor of the City of Edina, do hereby
proclaim June 14, 1990, as
KIDS CLUB'S 10TH ANNIVERSARY
in the City of Edina.
ADOPTED this 4th day of June, 1990.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by
Member Kelly to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards
Motion carried.
*LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR LOT 2. BLOCK 1. MCCAULEY HEIGHTS 3RD ADDITION
6404 -6406 MCCAULEY CIRCLE Notion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by
Member Kelly for adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land:
Lot 2, Block 1, MCCAULEY HEIGHTS 3RD ADDITION, according to the recorded plat
thereof; and
WHEREAS the owner has requested the subdivision of said tract into separate
parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows:
Parcel A - The southwesterly 55.00 feet of Lot 2, Block 1, MCCAULEY HEIGHTS
3RD ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, as measured at a right
angle from the southwesterly line thereof.
Parcel B - That part of Lot 2, Block 1, MCCAULEY HEIGHTS 3RD ADDITION,
according to the recorded plat thereof, lying northeasterly of the
southwesterly 55.00 feet thereof, as measured at a right angle from the
southwesterly line thereof.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said
Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the
Subdivision and zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance
Nos. 804 and 825;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is
hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 804 and
Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof
as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any
other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further
subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent
ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may
be provided for by those ordinances.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes.
*LOT DIVISION - LOT 3. BLOCS 1. STRINGER'S ADDITION AND LOT 3. BLOCK 1 PATTEN
ADDITION - 5144 VALLEY VIEW ROAD AND 5149 CODE AVENUE Motion was made by Member
Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly for adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute various separate
parcels:
Lot 3, Block 1, PATTEN ADDITION, and
Lot 3, Block 1, STRINGER'S ADDITION
WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to combine said tracts into
the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "Parcels "):
Lot 3, Block 1, PATTEN ADDITION except that part lying North of a line
running from a point on the West line 50.80 feet South of the Northwest
corner of said Lot 3, Block 1, PATTEN ADDITION to a point on the East line of
Lot 3, Block 1, PATTEN ADDITION 65.0 feet South of the Northeast corner of
Lot 3, Block 1, PATTEN ADDITION and there terminating.
Lot.3, Block 1, STRINGER'S ADDITION and that part of Lot 3, Block 1, PATTEN
ADDITION lying North of a line running from a point on the West line 50.80
feet South of the Northwest corner of said Lot 3, Block 1, PATTEN ADDITION to
a point on the East line of Lot 3, Block 1, PATTEN ADDITION 65.0 feet South
of the Northeast corner of Lot 3, Block 1, PATTEN ADDITION and there
terminating.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and
Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and
said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the
Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance
Nos. 804 and 825;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is
hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 804 and
Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof
as separate tracts of'land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any
other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further
subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent
ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may
be provided for by those ordinances.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes.
*HEARING DATE 6/18290 SET FOR PLANNING BATTER Notion was made by Member Paulus
and was seconded by Member Kelly to set June 18, 1990, as hearing date for the
Final Rezoning from PCD -4 to PCD -2, Planned Commercial District, Valgreen's by
Semper Holdings.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes.
FIRST READING GRANTED FOR ORDINANCE NO. 824 - (REOUIRING LICENSES AND ESTABLISHING
STANDARDS FOR RESTRICTED ACCESS PARKING LOTS) AND ORDINANCE NO 171 -A33 - (TO ADD
FEE FOR LICENSING OF RESTRICTED ACCESS PARKING LOTS) Planner Craig Larsen stated
that in accordance with the direction of the Council at its meeting of May 7,
1990, the Ordinance regulating restricted access parking lots has been rewritten
and been reviewed by City Attorney Erickson. Copies of the revised Ordinance were
distributed to Fairview Southdale Hospital, owners of the Medical Building and Dr.
Lambert representing the tenants' group at Southdale Medical Building. Two
changes to be noted; one in Section 17, that access is provided to the building
through the site without going through gates, pay boxes or taking tickets, to
drop -off persons. The only exception would be if the Director of Public Works
determines it is not feasible, i.e., would greatly reduce the number of public
spaces on site or that it is unsafe. At that point a 15 minute grace period would
be required. Secondly, the Ordinance is written to be retroactive. The two paid
parking lots already in operation would have to comply with the requirements for
obtaining a license. The fees (Ordinance 171 -A33) are the same as previously
discussed and staff feels they are adequate.
Attorney Erickson suggested an addition to the wording of Sec. 6, License Fee, to
be that the License Fee is paid with the application. Also, the last sentence of
Sec. 8 now reads "A certificate of insurance shall be filed with the City Clerk
with the application." As to the suggestion that in the heading for Sec. 17 Free
Access to Building, the word 'free' be changed to 'clear', Attorney Erickson
recommended that the heading read, Access to Building.
Member Rice questioned whether the licensing fee is adequate to cover costs.
Manager Rosland said this is an untypical case. If the ordinance had been in
place, the review would have been much less time consuming. This will be closely
monitored and if the proposed fee does not cover costs, staff will recommend
change. Member Rice suggested possible changes in Ordinance No. 824, in Sec. 11,
language as 'shall be conspicuously outlined with pavement paint and' should be
stricken, and Sec. 15. (a) Attendant Buildings, i.e., exterior wall finishes,
specifically the prefinished metal panel portion is a concern and he would like to
discuss this type of finish.
Member Kelly said she had a concern with the removal of the word 'Free' from Sec.
17, Free Access to Building. She felt the goal of this Ordinance was to maintain
the safety and welfare of the citizens via safe access to the building. She
recommended eliminating paragraph (b) of Sec. 17.
Attorney Erickson stated that concerns over emergency vehicle access is covered in
Sec. 13. In Sec. 22, the ordinance becomes retroactive and is the most legally
weak point. To impose this ordinance retroactively, to retrofit their lot, this
is allowed by the courts but only when the benefit to the public is clearly
outweighed by the cost to the property owner. How this function will work is in
question, especially at the Fairview Southdale Medical Building. If it can be
done in a reasonably inexpensive way or not, at.this time, is debatable. If cost
is prohibitive, Sec. (b) comes into effect. Sec. 17 (b) is a savings clause in
case the retroactive effect results in a situation where they cannot comply cost
wise.
Member Kelly commented that since the addition to Fairview Hospital and and the
building of the parking ramp were done with some public contribution, can we
retroactively allow Sec. 17 (b) to compensate for their inability to make the lot
pay for itself. Attorney Erickson answered that access via an open lane is not a
problem for the hospital, but is for the medical building.
Bill Chandler, resident of Edina and Southdale Medical Building tenant, agreed
with Member Kelly's comments on Sec. 17 (a) and (b). He stated that the now
implemented parking program went through stringent staff review yet has become a
tragic problem regarding open access for people, handicapped persons and emergency
vehicles. He believed Sec. 17 (a) the first sentence was fine, but felt the
second sentence of the same section should be removed. This sentence reads,
"However, if in the opinion of the Director /City Engineer, such a driveway is not
feasible, or will be unsafe and therefore is not provided for in the parking lot,
then the provisions of subsection (b) of this section shall apply." He reminded
everyone of the difficult time anyone would have with access to the building if
the winter had been a normal one. He asked for clarification of the second
sentence, and asked whether the owner could default to Sec. 17, (b) too readily.
Mayor Richards commented that if the Ordinance is adopted, we do not know what the
Director /City Engineer is going to require regarding implementing the ordinance
until the issue comes up. He stated that the Director /City Engineer would have to
deal with the property owner when the issues arise.
Paul Belvedeere, DDS, Southdale Medical Building, said that the verbiage in 17
(a), will create questions of whether or not you can force the owner of the
building to comply with the ordinance and questioned whether there will be an
escape clause. Mayor Richards said in his opinion the Director /City Engineer will
have the public's best interest in mind, and will address that issue and act
accordingly.. Dr. Belvedeere commented about Sec. 13, Emergency Vehicle Access,
and the use of the word 'thing', as it applies to anything that would block
access. He also asked, when the Director /City Engineer saw the initial plans, why
the lot would have gotten to this point, i.e., long aisles with no turnarounds at
the end, permanent blocking and the possibility of having to back out if no
parking space is found.
(Member Smith entered the meeting at 8:40 P.M.)
Mr. Chandler commented that this lot had five entrances and five exits at the
start, two gave clear access straight to the main door. If the plans are
implemented as shown by the building owner, it worsens considerably the access and
congestion at the main entrance. The plan takes every car that wants to park
anywhere on the west side, and makes it move within 10' of the main door. Mr.
Chandler felt Sec. 18, Alterations, is a very important section. He inquired if
the building owners need to acquire approval now as stated in Sec. 18, or can
changes be made without approval. Attorney Erickson said at present there is no
ordinance regulating private parking lots that are turned into restricted access
parking lots. Any control over that type of lot would begin by establishing
Ordinance 824.
Member Bice introduced Ordinance No. 824 for first reading as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 824
AN ORDINANCE REQUIRING LICENSES AND
ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR RESTRICTED
ACCESS PARSING LOTS, AND IMPOSING A PENALTY
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Definitions.
"City" means the City of Edina, Minnesota
"Council" means the City Council of the City
"Director" means the Director of Public Works and Engineering of the City of
Edina, or his designated representative.
"Free parking lot" means a parking lot to which access is unrestricted.
"Motor vehicle" means every vehicle which is self - propelled and not deriving
its power from overhead wires.
"Motor vehicle reservoir area" means the area at the entrance of a restricted
access parking lot between the public street right -of -way line and the point at
which access to the parking lot is restricted.
"Parking lot" means any area with ten (10) or more parking spaces used for
the parking or storing of motor vehicles, including, without limitation, parking
ramps as defined in the Zoning Ordinance, which is operated for the benefit of
persons such as, but not limited to, employees, members, customers, patrons,
clients or visitors.
"Restricted access parking lot" means a parking lot to which access is
restricted by mechanical or other means.
"Zoning Ordinance" means the Ordinance No. 825 of the City as it may now or
hereafter be amended, revised or supplemented and including any successor
ordinance to said Ordinance No. 825.
Sec. 2. License Required. No person shall own or operate, or in any way
offer to operate, a restricted access parking lot without a license for that
parking lot first being obtained pursuant to this ordinance.
Sec. 3. License Procedure and Enforcement Penalty. The provisions of
Ordinance No. 141 of the City, including the enforcement and penalty provisions
thereof, shall apply to all licenses required by this ordinance and to the holders
of such licenses.
Sec. 4. Application for License. Any person desiring a license to own or
operate a restricted access parking lot shall file an application with the City
Clerk on forms provided by the Clerk. The application shall contain, in addition
to the information required by Ordinance No. 141 of the City, a plot plan, the
name of the owner of the parking lot and the name of the manager or operator of
the parking lot if different from the owner. The plot plan shall show such
information as is required by the Zoning Ordinance for the parking lot to be
licenses —d, and by other applicable codes, ordinances or regulations of the City,
including, without limitation, all entrances and exits, the location of motor
vehicle reservoir areas, the interior circulation system of the parking lot, the
dimensions and grade of the parking lot and of all entrances and exits, drainage
from the parking lot, the location and design of attendant buildings, the location
of emergency vehicle access, the location and size of self - service ticket vendors,
landscaping or screening as required by the Zoning Ordinance, the location, size
and shape of all signs, the location, height and kind of outdoor lights, and the
location, size and shape of all signs, the location, height and kind of outdoor
lights, and the location of the free access driveway as and if required by Section
17(a) hereof. No application shall be considered complete unless the plot plan
for the parking lot has been determined by the Director to comply with all
requirements and standards of this ordinance and other applicable ordinances,
codes and regulations of the City.
Sec. 5. Procedure: Approval by Director. Prior to the issuance of a
license, the Director shall determine if the parking lot complies with all the
provisions and standards of this ordinance and other applicable ordinances, codes
and regulations of the City, including, without limitation, the provisions of the
Zoning Ordinance. If all such provisions are met, and proper application has been
made, the City may grant the license.
Sec. 6. License Fee. A license fee shall be paid as provided in Ordinance
No. 171 of the City, (Note: The following list of fees is for Council
information; it will not be a part of this ordinance as adopted. The fees are
proposed to be as follows; There shall be an original license fee of $500.00 for
all restricted access parking lots, payable with the original application.
Thereafter, annual license fees shall be:
0 - 50 parking spaces $100.00
51 - 100 parking spaces 150.00
101 - 200 parking spaces 250.00
Over 200 parking spaces 400.00
Sec. 7. Expiration Date. All licenses issued under this ordinance shall
expire on the 31st day of December following its date of issuance.
Sec. 8. Insurance Required. Each licensee under this ordinance at all
times shall keep in full force and effect, a public liability insurance policy
written by an insurance company authorized to do business in Minnesota, in the
following minimum amounts: fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) property damage; one
hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) for injury or death of one person; and five
hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) for injuries or death from each occurrence. A
certificate of insurance shall be filed with the City Clerk.
Sec. 9. Revocation, Suspension, Denial of License. A license granted under
this ordinance may be revoked, suspended or denied pursuant to the provisions of
Ordinance No. 141 of the City. Violations of any of the terms of this ordinance
shall be cause for revocation, suspension, or refusal to renew a license.
Sec. 10. Inspection Required: Notice. Correction of Violations. At such
times as deemed necessary by the City, the Director shall cause every restricted
access parking lot located within the City to be inspected. In the event a
restricted access parking lot is found not in compliance with any of the
provisions of this ordinance or of any other applicable ordinance, code or
regulation of the City, the City may proceed to enforce this ordinance pursuant to
the procedures set out in this ordinance, or Ordinance No. 141 of the City or
pursuant to the procedures set out in the ordinance, code or regulation which is
not being complied with.
Sec. 11. Motor Vehicle Reservoir. A restricted access parking lot shall
have a motor vehicle reservoir area at each entrance from a public right -of -way.
The motor vehicle reservoir area for a restricted access parking lot shall have at
least four (4) eight and one half (8 1/2) foot by twenty (20) foot spaces. The
motor vehicle reservoir area shall be conspicuously outlined with pavement paint
and shall not be used for the parking or storage of motor vehicles or for any
other use which hinders, restricts or prevents use of such area as a motor vehicle
reservoir.
Sec. 12. Placement of Motor Vehicles. No motor vehicle shall be parked in a
manner that would prevent reclamation of any motor vehicle upon request. If claim
checks are used to restrict access to the restricted access parking lot, then at
not time shall any driver with a current claim check be refused the opportunity to
obtain his motor vehicle, provided the driver has paid accumulated parking
charges.
Sec. 13. Emergency Vehicle Access. Each restricted access parking lot shall
be designed or operated in a manner approved by the Director so as to allow
emergency vehicles to access the building or buildings served by the restricted
access parking lot at any time without a claim check and without going through a
motor vehicle reservoir area. Such emergency vehicle access at all times shall be
kept free of motor vehicles, snow, ice, fill, rubbish, or any other material or
thing which will or may block such access.
Sec. 14. Claim Check. When a motor vehicle is left for parking in a
restricted access parking lot, the driver will be furnished with a claim check on
which shall be printed the full name of the operator, the address of the parking
lot, the license number under which the parking lot is operating, and the date and
time of issuance of the claim check.
Sec. 15. Attendant Buildings:, Attendant buildings shall be located only at
exits to restricted access parking lots and shall be located no closer than twenty
(20) feet from the street right -of -way. Minimum standards for the materials and
general design of attendant buildings shall be as follows:
(a) Attendant buildings shall have a minimum floor area sufficient to
accommodate the normal complement of parking lot operating personnel.
The building shall be enclosed and weather tight. It shall be equipped
with an operable and lockable door and window. It shall be set on a
curb or platform rising a minimum of six (6) inches above the adjacent
lot paving. Service connections shall be in accordance with applicable
codes and ordinances of the City.
(b) Exterior wall finishes shall be one, or a combination of, the following:
face brick, natural stone, glass or prefinished metal panels.
(c) All building plans for attendant buildings shall be submitted to the
Building Official of the City to determine compliance with this
ordinance and all other applicable codes, ordinances and regulations of
the City.
(d) Attendant buildings shall be kept clean and in good condition and state
of repair at all times.
Sec. 16. Signs: Charges Limited to Those on Sign.
(a) Every restricted access parking lot licensee shall maintain information
signs in the parking lot as required by this section.
(b) There shall be a sign at each entrance to the parking lot, located not
further into the parking lot than the point at which access to the parking lot is
restricted. Each such sign shall show the name and telephone number of the
licensee, the license number under which the parking lot is operating, and if
charges are made, the rates charged for parking or storing motor vehicles on said
parking lot. Such signs shall state the minimum rate, the maximum rate for 12
hours and the maximum rate for 24 hours, and if there are no maximum rates, the
sign shall so state. Such signs shall also state.all special rates, including any
weekly or monthly rates. No change in the posted rates shall be effective until
notice of such change has been given not less than 24 hours prior to the effective
time of the change by posting the same on the parking lot entrance signs using
letters and numbers at least equal in size to the other letters and numbers on
such.sign. Such signs shall not exceed two feet by three feet, shall be
permanently mounted with a minimum distance to the bottom of the sign of three
feet, and a maximum distance to the bottom of the sign of five feet, and shall
conform to all City codes, ordinances and regulations regarding erection and
construction. Layout of sign graphics shall be approved by the Director including
color, size of lettering, placement of information and identification symbols. In
no case shall any letters or numerals be less than two inches in height.
(c) No sign graphics of any type shall be attached to or displayed on any
attendant building except that a sign may be attached or incorporated into the
building design which specifies the hours of attendant duty, the location of keys
after attendant hours, the name, phone number and license number of the licensee,
and any other information essential to the normal operation of the lot.
(d) All restricted access parking lots which engage in towing of
unauthorized motor vehicles shall post such practice on a sign at each lot
entrance. In addition, each such sign shall include the name and telephone number
of the tower used. Letters on such signs shall be at least one (1) inch in
height. Such signs shall exceed one foot by two feet, and shall be located on the
same support or supports as the entrance sign required by subsection (b) of this
section, but below such entrance sign.
(e) No restricted access parking lot licensee shall charge, or allow to be
charged, any greater sum for parking a motor vehicle than is stated on the
entrance signs.
(f) All signs shall be kept in good condition and state of repair at all
times.
Sec. 17. Free Access to Building.
(a) Each restricted access parking lot shall provide at least one driveway
through the parking lot (which may be one -way) giving access to the building or
buildings served by the parking lot, with an entrance to and exit from the
driveway directly to a public street, so that persons can be dropped off and
picked up at such building or buildings, at any time, without a claim check and
without going through a motor vehicle reservoir area. However, if, in the opinion
of the Director, such a driveway is not feasible, or will be unsafe and therefore
is not provided for in the parking lot, then the provisions of subsection (b) of
this section shall apply.
(b). No licensee shall charge, or allow to be charged, any parking or other
fee for any motor vehicle which leaves the restricted access parking lot within
fifteen (15) minutes of the time of entry of such vehicle into such parking lot as
shown on the claim check issued to such vehicle.
Sec. 18. Alterations. No restricted access parking lot licensee shall make,
or allow to be made, any alterations or modifications in the parking lot which
varies from the plot plans approved by the Director pursuant to this ordinance for
that restricted access parking lot, without prior written approval of the
Director.
Sec. 19. unauthorized Use of Vehicles. No personnel of a restricted access
parking lot shall use or permit the use, for any purpose whatsoever, of any motor
vehicles left in such lot for parking unless authorised in writing by the owner or
person in charge of such vehicle.
Sec. 20. Transferring Vehicle to Another Lot. No restricted access parking
lot personnel shall transfer any motor vehicle to another parking lot without the
consent of the owner or person in charge of said vehicle unless such vehicle is in
such lot without permission or payment.
Sec. 21. Prohibited Acts. The licensee of a restricted access parking lot
shall not permit the repairing (except in an emergency), dismantling or wrecking
of any motor vehicle, or in the storage of any inoperable vehicles (as defined in
Ordinance No. 1031 of the City) on the parking lot.
Sec. 22. Retroactive Effect. It is intended that this ordinance be
effective retroactively. Therefore, any parking lot which is a restricted access
parking lot on the effective date of this ordinance. within 120 days of the
effective date of this ordinance, shall obtain a license under this ordinance for
such parking lot, or cease operation as a restricted access parking lot.
Sec. 23. Penalty. Any person violating this ordinance shall be subject to
the penalties set forth in Ordinance No. 175 of the City. Such penalties may be
imposed in addition to penalties allowed by this ordinance.
The ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage
and publication.
Motion was seconded by Member Smith.
Mayor Richards asked for discussion. Member Smith questioned the difference in
the meaning of free and clear in the Sec. 17 heading. Attorney Erickson said the
context is more important than the heading. Member Smith and Member Kelly
concurred that the word 'clear' be added to Sec. 17, (a) second line. Member
Kelly offered an amendment to the motion that subsection (b) in Sec. 17 the last
sentence in 17 (a) be eliminated. Member Paulus seconded the motion. Mayor
Richards asked for discussion on the amendment. Member Paulus asked if legally
this could be challenged in a court of law. Attorney Erickson stated by making an
ordinance retroactive and requiring someone to retrofit their parking lot to meet
requirements, the courts would need to decide whether there was any benefit to the
public that would clearly outweigh the cost to the property owner. If the cost to
the property owner is greater than the benefit, they would not approve a
retroactive application. Member Paulus asked whether there were two lots that
would be grandfathered in and that one already has public access. All future lots
could not challenge this and would have to comply. She asked if the ordinance is
approved with the amendment, could we be challenged by Southdale Medical.
Attorney Erickson stated the balancing test may prove in favor of the City.
Member Rice stated he could not vote for the amendment, because of the advice of
Counsel and felt he had confidence in staff to judge what is feasible.
Member Smith stated his understanding is that Sec. 17 (b) is unnecessary if clear
access was available for pick -up', drop -off of persons. Attorney Erickson stated
that Sec. 17 (b) would not be needed if access was provided. Mayor Richards said
his understanding was, you can enter the lot without a claim ticket and not have
to pay any money; that we are not talking about free parking but free access.
Mayor Richards stated he would not support the amendment but would support the
ordinance. He said the way he read the ordinance and subsection (b) is only a an
escape clause in regard to the retroactive implications. It establishes a place
to come in, at any time without a claim check and without passing through a motor
vehicle reservoir area, to pick -up or drop -off persons. Member Kelly said by
placing the Director /City Engineer in this situation, the law could be contested.
For means of clarification, Attorney Erickson explained that the purpose of free
access is to get to the building to drop- off,and pick -up people without incurring
a charge. There are two ways this can be done, via a clear lane or by a 15 minute
grace period. The issue of a clear lane should be addressed first, then the 15
minute grace period. Member Paulus questioned whether there are other ordinances
that could be challenged in a court of law in regard to staff decisions'. She
questioned if the City or the staff person is put too much at risk with these
decisions. Attorney Erickson responded that the staff person is put more at risk
on this project with these responsibilities.
Mr. Chandler commented that there are only.two issues in retroactivity, both are
health care facilities needing good access, one is a hospital with no issue, the
other a medical building with an issue. He spoke in favor of the amendment.
Mayor Richards called for rollcall on the amendment'on the floor.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly
Nays: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion defeated.
Member Smith then offered an amendment to the motion to add the word 'clear' to
the first sentence of Sec. 17 (a), i.e, "Each restricted access parking lot shall
provide at least one driveway through the parking lot (which may be one -way)
giving "clear" access to the building... Motion was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
Mayor Richards called for rollcall vote on the First Reading of Ordinance No. 824
as amended and subject to the additions previously stated by Attorney Erickson.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
First Reading granted.
Member Paulus then offered Ordinance No. 171 -A33 for First Beading as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 171 -A33
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 171
TO ADD LICENSE FEE FOR RESTRICTED ACCESS PARSING LOTS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Schedule A to Ordinance No. 171 is hereby amended by adding
the following thereto:
ORD. SEC.
NO. NO PURPOSE OF FEE /CHARGE AMOUNT FEE N0.
8245 6 Restricted Access Parking
Lot License $500.00 28a -1
Renewals:
0 -50 parking spaces 100.00 28a -2
51 -100 parking spaces 150.00 28a -3
101 -200 parking spaces 250.00 28a -4
Over 200 parking spaces 400.00 28a -5
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon
its passage and publication.
Motion was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
First Reading granted.
*AWARD OF BID FOR STORM SEVER IMPROVEMENT NOS. STS -204. STS -205. STS -206 CONTINUED
TO 6118/90. Notion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly to
continue to June 18, 1990, the award of bid for Storm Sever Improvement Nos.
STS -204, STS -205, STS -206.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*AWARD OF BID FOR UPGRADING/RETROFITTING OF 30 LIGHT FIXTURES AND CIRCUITRY AT
BRAEMAR SOCCER&OOTBALL FIELD Notion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded
by Member Kelly.for award of bid for upgrading, retrofitting and circuitry at
Braemar Soccer/Football field to recommended low bidder, CSI Electric, at
.$16,800.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*AWARD OF BID FOR RESTROOM REMODELING AT BRAEMAR ARENA Motion was made by Member
Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for restroom remodeling
to make them handicap accessible at Braemar Arena to recommended low bidder, Engco
Construction, at $28,910.000.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*AWARD OF BID FOR SOOT ®ALB WATER TOWER CLEANING Motion was made by Member Paulus
and was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for cleaning of the Southdale
Water Tower to recommended low bidder H b H Watertower, Inc., at $8,200.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*AWARD OF BID FOR AREA LIGHTING AT BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE Motion was made by Member
Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for area lighting around
the Braemar Clubhouse to recommended low bidder, Ridgedale Electric, Inc., at
$11,100.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*IUOE LOCAL 49 CONTRACT APPROVED Motion was made by Member Paulus and was
seconded by Member Kelly to approve Local 49 IUOE Contract (Public Works) as
presented.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*LOCAL 320 TEAMSTERS 1990 CONTRACT APPROVED Motion was made by Member Paulus and
was seconded by Member Kelly to approve Local 320 Teamsters 1990 Contract (Police)
as presented.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*CHANGE OF POLLING LOCATION FOR PRECINCT 17 NOTED Motion was made by Member
Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly for adoption of the following Resolution:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the
polling place for Precinct 17 in the City of Edina be changed from 7151 York
Avenue South to Lutheran Church of the Master, 7128 France Avenue South.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*ON -SALE WINE LICENSE AND ON -SALE BEER LICENSE FOR 0 CUMBERS RESTAURANT APPROVED
-Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly to approve the
on -sale vine license and the on -sale beer license for Q. Cambers Restaurant at
7465 France Avenue South in Centennial Lakes.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*WINE LICENSE RENEWALS FOR EMPRESS RESTAURANT. ORIGINAL PANCAKE HOUSE AND SZECHUAN
STAR RESTAURANT APPROVED Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by
Member Kelly to approve the vine license renewals for the Empress Restaurant, the
Original Pancake House and Szechuan Star Restaurant as recommended by the Police
Department.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*CLUB LIQUOR AND SUNDAY LIQUOR LICENSE RENEVALS APPROVED Motion was made by
Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly to approve renewal of the Club
Liquor license and Sunday Liquor License for Edina Country Club and Interlachen
Country Club as recommended by the Police Department.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*TENTATIVE DATE SET FOR COMMUNITY INFORMATION SEMINAR - SEPTEMBER 18 1990 Motion
was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly to tentatively set
September 18, 1990, as the Fall 1990 City - School- Chamber of Commerce Community
Information Seminar.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly to
approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register
dated 6/4/90 and consisting of 25 pages: General Fund $226,841.57, Communications
$1,198.39, Art Center $8,403.21, Capital Fund $42.00, Swimming Pool Fund $663.00,
Golf Course Fund $23,840.93, Recreation Center Fund $1,611.86, Edinborough Park
$8,154:40, Utility Fund $253,794.43, Storm Sewer Utility $9,376.92, Liquor
Dispensary Fund $6,660.61, Construction Fund $35,081.17, Total $575,668.49.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the
meeting adjourned at 9:17 P.M.
Acting City Clerk
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
JUNE 18, 1990
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor
Richards.
RECYCLING REBATE CHECK PRESENTED Commissioner John Keefe, on behalf of the
Hennepin Board of Commissioners, presented a check in the amount of $174,662.00 to
the City of Edina as the final payment for 1989. Because the City of Edina has
exceeded its waste reduction goal of 10% it qualifies for the rebate from Hennepin
County covering 80% of the costs of the City's Recycling Program. Commissioner
Keefe said the Board appreciated the efforts of Edina to recycle and is looking
forward to working with the City on developing a recycling program for apartment
buildings.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by
Member Paulus to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented, with the
exception of the removal of item VI.B - Golf Balls for Driving Range - Braemar
Golf Course.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF JOINT HRA /COUNCIL MEETING OF 5/21/90 APPROVED Motion was made by
Member Smith and was seconded by Member Paulus to approve the minutes of the Joint
HRA /Council Meeting of May 21, 1990 as submitted.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
FINAL REZONING TO PCD -2 PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT APPROVED FOR WAL.GREEN'S AT
4916 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and
ordered placed on file. Planner Craig Larsen presented the request for final
rezoning to PCD -2 Planned Commercial District for property at 4916 France Avenue
to allow construction of a Walgreen's drug store. He recalled that at the May 21,
1990 Council meeting preliminary rezoning was approved with the understanding that
additional information on design, materials and parking would be provided.
Planner Larsen stated that the proponents have made some design refinements to the
plan which would be explained in detail by their architect.
At the time of preliminary approval concern was expressed that a precedent may be
set by granting the requested parking variance. Staff is of the opinion that it
would not for these reasons: 1) Section 8.B of the Zoning Ordinance specifically
allows the use of public parking facilities within redevelopment project areas
(50th /France and Grandview), and 2) The proposed plan also conforms to a 1978
policy amendment to the 50th and France Redevelopment Plan. That policy allows
expansions up to a FAR of 1.0 to rely totally on public parking and the proposed
development would be consistent with that policy.
Council members also questioned the amount of the public parking assessment which
was proposed at the same amount as was assessed against the 50th and France
properties for the 1975 redevelopment project. Planner Larsen referred to a
memorandum dated June 18, 1990 from Gordon Hughes, Assistant City Manager, which
addressed the public parking assessment. Assistant Manager Hughes had stated
that, in his opinion, the most' appropriate factor to use would be the interest
rate that the City paid on the 1975 50th and France Improvement Bonds. The net
interest rate of those bonds was 5.977 %. If this rate were applied to the
$9,430.00 assessment on a compounded basis, the amount now due would be
$20,056.85.
David Runyan, architect for the project, presented the final rendition of the
proposed project based on the comments made at preliminary approval as follows:
1) Building mass - A band of colored stucco is now designed for the top of
the building which will visually lower the building. Awnings will spring off the
soldier course and come down to an eight foot line to hide the glass and add more
shadow play to the building.
2) Material - Samples of the fired brick to be used on the building exterior
were presented.
3) France Avenue Elevation - Will be the same as the 49 1/2 Street side of
the building with piers and decorative lighting. Glazing will be set in aluminum
frames and will be an opaque glass that will blend with the brick color.
4) Building Style /Materials - Photos of each building in the 50th and France
Commercial District showed no continuity in design, but a mix of everything.
5) Site Plan - The rotation of the building on the site allowed two -way
traffic, created a longer stacking space for northbound vehicles turning into the
site, added one parking space, reduced the length of the building from 110 to 105
feet, and the alley exit has been made safer for pedestrians using the 49 1/2
Street sidewalk.
In conclusion, Mr. Runyan stated that the changes have addressed the concerns of
the Council, the proposed project will fit into the 50th and France neighborhood
and the proponents are now asking for final rezoning approval.
Mayor Richards then called for public comment on the request for final rezoning.
Hosmer Brown, 50th and France tenant, asked where the building entrance would be
located and if the building has actually been reduced in height. Mr. Runyan said
the entrance would be at the southeast corner of the building. He explained that
the building height has been reduced visually by use of the band of stucco. No
further comment was heard.
Member Smith moved Second Reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 825 -A36 as
follows, subject to payment of $20,056.85 as a condition of the parking variance
for Walgreen's at 4916 France Avenue:
ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A36
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 825
BY REZONING PROPERTY TO PCD -2 PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
FROM PCD -4 PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 6 of Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding
the following thereto:
"The extent of the Planned Commercial District (PCD -2) is enlarged by the
addition of the following property:
Lots'21 and 22, also the south 42.5 feet of Lot 20, also the north 7.5 feet
of Lot 23, Auditors Subdivision No. 172, according to the recorded plat
thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Except
That part of Lot 22 and the north 7 1/2 feet of Lot 23, Auditors
Subdivision No. 172, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the recorded
plat thereof, lying southerly and easterly of the following described line:
Beginning at a point on the east line of said Lot 22 distant 27.84 feet
north from the southeast corner of said lot; thence southwesterly 38.38
feet along a curve tangent to said east line, concave to the northwest,
radius 25.00 feet, central angle 87 degrees 58 minutes 04 seconds; thence
tangent to said curve 110.95 feet, to a point in the west line of said
Lot 23 distant 2.40 feet south of the northwest corner thereof.
The extent of the Planned Commercial District (PCD -4) is reduced by removing
the property described above from the PCD -4 District."
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage
and publication.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Motion for adoption of
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus,
Ordinance adopted.
Mayor
the ordinance was seconded by Member Rice.
Rice, Smith, Richards
PRELIMINARY REZONING TO PRD -2 AND PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL RECONSIDERED FOR
ROBERT HANSON PROPERTY: APPROVALS GRANTED Affidavits of Notice were presented,
approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen recalled that on April 16,
1990 the Council approved the preliminary rezoning to PRD -2 and preliminary plat
on the subject property, generally located north of Crosstown Highway 62 and East
of Highway 169. However, the Council action reduced the request from the proposed
12 units to 10 units and changed the conditions for the collection of the special
assessments that was proposed by the developer. Since that time, staff has been
contacted by the attorney for the developer asking for a hearing before the
Council to reconsider that preliminary approval. Notices have been mailed to the
same neighborhood as was done originally.
Presentation by Proponent
James Van Valkenburg, attorney for Schaefer Development, proponent, stated that
this matter is back before the Council to request: 1) Preliminary plat approval,
2) Rezoning to permit construction of 12 units of detached townhomes, and 3)
Resolution cancelling the current special assessments and re- assessing the same
equally over the 12 lots.
He recalled that this matter has been before the Council and Planning Commission
numerous times over the last number of years. In more recent times, a proposal
for development of property had been approved for as many as 15 units and the
present request is asking for 12. The 10 unit development approved on April 16,
1990 has created economic problems so that the project cannot go forward.
Concerning the special assessments on the property, Mr. Van Valkenburg said the
proponent is asking that they be spread over the 12 lots to be paid over five
years rather than the current obligation of four years. Schaefer Development
intends to build on this property as they have represented to the Council. They
would start construction on the first unit within 90 days and expect that the
entire project would be completed within 18 months.
The purchase agreement between Robert Hanson, property owner, and Schaefer
Development also provides that if Schaefer Development only develops a part of the
subdivision and then decides not to proceed, that all plans, drawings, models,
sketches, architectural drawings and engineering data will be turned over to
Mr. Hanson so that he or another developer he would employ would then.proceed to
complete the project.
In conclusion, Mr. Van Valkenburg said this procedure would assure that the
project can be developed economically and that the special assessments and regular
taxes will be paid.
Member Smith said, in addition to the previous issue as to number of units, his
concern was how to assure that the special assessments will be paid outside of
some type of guarantee. Mr. Van Valkenburg said the Purchase Agreement provides
that as each lot is taken down from the Agreement that the proportionate amount of
special assessments 'would be paid by Schaefer Development. Further, if Schaefer
Development does not complete the project all plans, etc. will go back to
Mr. Hanson so that he can finish the development. Their expectation is to have
the project completed within 18 months but the market will dictate that.
Steve Wilson, ,Schaefer Development, stressed that at this point there is no
guarantee that the special assessments will be paid by anyone. He said that,
after looking at the area and consulting with a number of people in the real
estate market to determine what would sell, he felt this is the most viable option
right now for a project that will succeed. With its success will come payment of
the special assessments. He asked that the Council consider the proposal
favorably.
Mayor Richards called for public comment on the proposed development. Tom Benson,
representing the Vernon Woods Townhomes Association, said they were concerned
about the project being be completed once it was started, that they were not
objecting to the property being developed but felt 10 units would be plenty in
that given area. They also are asking that construction of the project start at
the east and proceed to the west.
In response, Steve Wilson explained that the east portion of the site is at the
end of the cul -de -sac and he would have no problem starting construction there.
However, he would object if someone mandated that he started developing at the
highest bank that would need to be cut and retained.
Mayor Richards asked how the 10 units previously approved would have been laid
out. Mr. Wilson said he may have spaced the units a few feet further apart. He
noted that there is a buffer of approximately 110 feet to the nearest Vernon Woods
townhome in the proposal now under consideration. A previous 10 unit twin homes
plan proposed to bring the buildings all the way to the setback line and were two
story units which would have been more massive than the current proposal.
Mayor Richards commented that upon re- evaluating the proposal he would support 12
units for these reasons. At one point in time the Council approved 15 units;
approval of 12 units would not be inconsistent with what was done in the past.
However, to insure that the 12 units are built and to not deviate from past
practice, the rezoning should be predicated on payment of special assessments
against the entire parcel.
Member Smith said he concurred as his prior concern was that the special
assessments get paid. He said he would support the project if a method can be
worked out to ensure that they are paid.
Member Rice said he concurred with the previous comments by Mayor Richards and
Member Smith concerning the special assessments. He said he felt 12 units are
reasonable, although a little tight.
Member Smith moved preliminary rezoning to PRD -2 Planned Residence District and
preliminary plat approval, subject to: 1) Maximum of 12 units, 2) Surety bond for
payment of special assessments, 3) Waiver of right to appeal special assessments,
4) Final rezoning, 5) Final plat approval, 6) Subdivision dedication,
7) Engineering specifications for retaining walls, and 8) Agreement in recordable
form that construction begin with the four lots at the east end .of the site and
proceed to the west, with First Reading of the ordinance and adoption of the
resolution as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A35
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825)
BY REZONING PROPERTY TO PRD -2 PLANNED RESIDENCE DISTRICT
FROM R -2 DOUBLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 6 of Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding
the following thereto:
"The extent of the Planned Residence District (PRD -2) is enlarged by the
addition of the following property:
That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 6,
Township 116 North, Range 21 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described
as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Northeast Quarter of
the Northwest Quarter; thence South along the West line of said Northeast
Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 709.1 feet more or less to a
point which is distant 814.5 feet North of the Southwest corner of said
Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence Easterly on a deflection
angle to the left of 87 degrees 40 minutes a distance of 676.3 feet; thence
North parallel with the West line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest
Quarter to the North line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter;
thence West along said North line to the point of beginning, which lies
Northeasterly of the Northerly line of County Road No. 62.
The extent of the R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District is reduced by removing
the property described above from the R -2 District."
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and
publication.
RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT
FOR SHADOW HILLS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "SHADOW HILLS ", platted by (names to be inserted when
plat is presented for signatures) and presented at the regular meeting of the
City Council of April 16, 1990, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat
approval.
Motion was for First Reading of the Ordinance and adoption of the resolution was
seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
First Reading granted; resolution adopted.
FINAL PLAT APPROVED FOR CUNNINGHAM ADDITION Planner Larsen presented the request
for final plat approval for subdivision of Lot 5, Block 1, Muir Woods Addition
which is located at the southerly tip of Valley View Road and is approximately two
acres in size. The proposed subdivision would create one additional new lot
approximately one acre in area, being the northerly lot. He recalled that at its
meeting of May 21, 1990 the Council had granted preliminary plat approval.
A condition to preliminary approval was the granting to the City of a scenic
easement to protect the wooded steep slopes and vegetation on the east and west
sides of the property. The proponent has revised the driveway approach to the new
lot so that the driveway would be constructed without removing existing mature
trees. Remaining areas with steep slopes would be protected by a conservation
easement.
Staff believes the driveway solution is acceptable and would recommend final plat
approval based on the following conditions:. 1) Subdivision dedication based on
land value of $90,000, 2) Recorded easement covering areas of-steep slopes, and 3)
Payment of utility connection charges.
Mayor Richards called for public comment on the request for final plat approval.
No comment or objection was heard.
Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption, subject
to: 1) Subdivision dedication of $7,200.00, 2) Recorded conservation easement
covering areas of steep slopes, and 3) Payment of utility connection charges:
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT
FOR CUNNINGHAM ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "CUNNINGHAM ADDITION ", platted by (name(s) to be inserted
when plat is presented for signatures ) and presented at the regular meeting of
the City Council of June 18, 1990, be and is hereby granted final plat approval.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Rice.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Resolution adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 824 - REQUIRING LICENSES AND ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR RESTRICTED
ACCESS PARKING LOTS AND ORDINANCE NO. 171 -A33 - ADDING FEE FOR LICENSING OF
RESTRICTED ACCESS PARKING LOTS ADOPTED Planner Larsen recalled that on June 14,
1990 the Council granted First Reading to an ordinance that would require the
licensing of all restricted access parking lots. The proposed ordinance has been
revised as approved by the Council.
Based on the Council Meeting discussion, Attorney Erickson has prepared revisions
of Sections 17 and 18 of Ordinance No. 824. Those sections now require, in
Section 17, that the licensee provide access to the building for dropping off and
picking up passengers without going through a reservoir area or using a claim
check. It also provides, in the revised Section 18, that if a licensee or
proposed licensee desires to vary from any of the terms and requirements of the
Ordinance, that a variance petition be filed together with a plan and that then be
reported to the Council for its action. The revisions would establish standards
which are more definite than the existing one in Section 17 relative to whether or
not the required drop -off and pick -up lane is "feasible ". It would also remove
from the Director the difficult task of deciding whether or not a clear driveway
should be required or the 15 minute grace period allowed, and places it more
appropriately with the Council.
Mayor Richards called for comment on Ordinance No. 824 and the proposed revisions
for Sections 17 and 18.
Member Smith commented that the variance process makes good sense and he would
support the Ordinance and proposed revisions.
Member Paulus stated that it is appropriate that this Ordinance comes into play
now, not because of what has happened, but what the future holds for the City in
the next 5 to 10 years. Part of the travel demand management strategy is going to
be paid parking for businesses as means of traffic control to discourage people
from using cars to get to and from their places of work.
Mayor Richards asked if the people who have been involved in this process have had
the opportunity to review the proposed revisions to the Ordinance. Planner Larsen
said he had talked to Dr. Lambert, Southdale Medical Building tenant, and had
asked him to pass the information on to others who have been involved.
Dr. Lambert seemed pleased with the proposed changes and was aware that the
Ordinance would be on the agenda.. The owners of Southdale Medical Building have
been following the process and staff has mailed copies to them; however, they have
stopped contacting staff. They did request that a copy of the Ordinance be sent
to them when it is adopted.
Member Rice referred to the recent letter from Fairview Hospital commenting on the
Ordinance, specifically Section 16(b) which states that "such signs shall also
state all special rates, including any weekly or monthly rates ". They felt it
only necessary to publish public parking rates and would like to see this
provision removed. Member Rice commented that the intent of the Ordinance is to
inform the public of the parking rates and .that he could go along with deleting
the weekly/monthly-rates. He said he fully supported the Ordinance and commended
staff and the City Attorney for their work on drafting the Ordinance. Attorney
Erickson said that in talking with Fairview - Southdale Hospital they objected to
the wording "all special rates" because they have numerous rates which apply to
different people and circumstances and to place all special rates on the signs
would be a burden.
Member Smith moved Second Reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 824 as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 824
AN ORDINANCE REQUIRING LICENSES AND
ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR RESTRICTED
ACCESS PARKING LOTS, AND IMPOSING A PENALTY
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Definitions.
"City" means the City of Edina, Minnesota.
"Council" means the City Council of the City.
"Director" means the Director of Public Works and Engineering of the City of
Edina,- or his designated representative.
"Free parking lot" means a parking lot to which access is unrestricted.
"Motor vehicle" means every vehicle which is self - propelled and not deriving
its power from overhead.wires.
"Motor vehicle reservoir area" means the area at the entrance of a restricted
access parking lot between the public street right of way line and the point at
which access to the parking lot is restricted.
"Parking lot" means any area with ten (10) or more parking spaces used for
the parking or storing of motor vehicles, including, without limitation, parking
ramps as defined in the Zoning Ordinance, which is operated for the benefit of
persons such as, but not limited to, employees, members, customers, patrons,
clients or visitors.
"Restricted access parking lot" means a parking lot to which access is
restricted by mechanical or other means.
"Zoning Ordinance" means the Ordinance No. 825 of the City as it may now or
hereafter be amended, revised or supplemented and including any successor
ordinance to said Ordinance No. 825.
Sec. 2. License Required. No person shall own or operate, or in any way
offer to operate, a restricted access parking lot without a license for that
parking lot first being obtained pursuant to this ordinance.
Sec. 3. License Procedure and Enforcement Penalty. The provisions of
Ordinance No. 141 of the City, including the enforcement and penalty provisions
thereof, shall apply to all licenses required by this ordinance and to the holders
of such licenses.
Sec. 4. Application for License. Any person desiring a license to own or
operate a restricted access parking lot shall fine an application with the City
Clerk on forms provided by the Clerk. The application shall contain, in addition
to the information required by Ordinance No. 141 of the City, a plot plan, the
name of the owner of the parking lot and the name of the manager or operator of
the parking lot if different from the owner. The plot plan shall show such
information as is required by the Zoning Ordinance for the parking lot to be
licenses, and by other applicable codes, ordinances or regulations of the City,
including, without limitation, all entrances and exits, the location of motor
vehicle reservoir areas, the interior circulation system of the parking lot, the
dimensions and grade of the parking lot and of all entrances and exits, drainage
from the parking lot, the location and design of attendant buildings, the location
of emergency vehicle access, the location and size of self - service ticket vendors,
landscaping or screening as required by the Zoning Ordinance, the location, size
and shape of all signs, the location height and kind of outdoor lights, and the
location of the free access driveway as required by Section 17 hereof. No.
application shall be considered complete unless the plot plan for the parking lot
has been determined by the Director to comply with all requirements and standards
of this ordinance and other applicable ordinances, codes and regulations of the
City.
Sec. 5. Procedure: Approval by Director. Prior to the issuance of a
license, the Director shall determine if the parking lot complies with all the
provisions and standards of this ordinance and other applicable ordinances, codes
and regulations of the City, including, without limitation, the provisions of the
Zoning Ordinance. If all such provisions are met, and proper application has been
made, the City may grant the license.
Sec. 6. License Fee. A license fee shall be paid with the application and
otherwise as provided in Ordinance No. 171 of the City.
Sec. 7. Expiration Date. All licenses issued under this ordinance shall
expire on the 31st day of December following its date of issuance.
Sec. 8. Insurance Required. Each licensee under this ordinance at all times
shall keep in full force and effect public liability insurance policy written by
an insurance company authorized to do business in Minnesota, in the following
minimum amounts: Fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) property damage; One hundred
thousand dollars ($100,000) for injury or death of one person; and Five Hundred
thousand dollars ($500,000) for injuries or death from each occurrence. A
certificate of insurance shall be filed with the City Clerk with the application.
Sec. 9. Revocation, Suspension. Denial of License. A license granted under
this ordinance may be revoked, suspended or denied pursuant to the provisions of
Ordinance No. 141 of the City. Violations of any of the terms of this ordinance
shall be cause for revocation, suspension, or refusal to renew a license.
Sec. 10. Inspection Required: Notice. Correction of Violations. At such
times as deemed necessary by the City, the Director shall cause every restricted
access parking lot located within the City to be inspected. In the event a
restricted access parking lot is found not in compliance with any of the
provisions of this ordinance or of any other applicable ordinance, code or
regulation of the City,'the City may proceed to enforce this ordinance pursuant to
the procedures.set out in this ordinance, or Ordinance No. 141 of the City or
pursuant to the procedures set out in the ordinance, code or regulation which is
not being complied with.
Sec. 11. Motor Vehicle Reservoir. A restricted access parking lot shall
have a motor vehicle reservoir area at each entrance from a public right of way.
The motor vehicle reservoir area for a restricted access parking lot shall have at
least four (4) eight and one half (8 1/2) foot by twenty (20) foot spaces. The
motor vehicle reservoir area shall be conspicuously outlined with pavement paint
and shall not be used for the parking or storage of motor vehicles or for any
other use which hinders, restricts or prevents use of such area as a motor vehicle
reservoir.
Sec. 12. Placement of Motor Vehicles. No motor vehicle shall be parked in a
manner that would prevent reclamation of any motor vehicle upon request. If claim
checks are used to restrict access to the restricted access parking lot, then at
no time shall any driver with a current claim check be refused the opportunity to
obtain his motor vehicle, provided the driver has paid accumulated parking
charges.
Sec. 13. Emergency Vehicle Access. Each restricted access parking lot shall
be designed or operated in a manner approved by the Director so as to allow
emergency vehicles to access the building or buildings served by the restricted
access parking lot at any time without a claim check and without going through a
motor vehicle reservoir area. Such emergency vehicle access at all times shall be
kept free of motor vehicles, snow, ice, fill, rubbish, or any other material or
thing which will or may block such access.
Sec. 14. Claim-Check. When a motor vehicle is left for parking in a
restricted access parking lot, the driver will be furnished with a claim check on
which shall be printed the full name of the operator, the address of the parking
lot, the license number under which the parking lot is operating, and the date and
time of issuance of the claim check.
Sec. 15. Attendant Buildings. Attendant buildings shall be located only at
exits to restricted access parking lots and shall be located no closer than twenty
(20) feet from the street right of way. Minimum standards for the materials and
general design of attendant buildings shall be as follows:
(a) Attendant buildings shall have a minimum floor area sufficient
to accommodate the normal complement of parking lot operating
personnel. The building shall be enclosed and weather tight.
It shall be equipped with an operable and lockable door and window.
It shall be set on a curb or platform rising a minimum of six (6)a
inches above the adjacent lot paving. Service connections shall be
in accordance with applicable codes and ordinances of the City.
(b) Exterior wall finishes shall be one, or a combination of the
following: face brick, natural stone, glass or prefinished
metal panels.
(c) All building plans for attendant buildings shall be submitted to
the Building Official of the City to determine compliance with this
ordinance and all other applicable codes, ordinances and regulations
of the City.
(d) Attendant buildings shall be kept clean and in good condition and
state of repair at all times.
Sec. 16. Signs: Charges Limited to Those on Sign.
(a) Every restricted access parking lot license shall maintain information
signs in the parking lot as required by this section.
(b) There shall be a sign at each entrance to the parking lot, located not
further into the parking lot than the point at which access to the parking lot is
restricted. Each such sign shall show the name and telephone number of the
licensee, the license number under which the parking lot is operating, and if
charges are made, the rates charged for parking or storing motor vehicles on said
parking lot. Such signs shall state the minimum rate, the maximum rate for 12
hours and the maximum rate for 24 hours, and if there are no maximum rates, the
sign shall so state. Such signs shall also state all special rates, including any
weekly or monthly rates. No change in the posted rates shall be effective until
notice of such change has been given not less than 24 hours prior to the effective
time of the change by posting the same on the parking lot entrance signs using
letters and numbers at least equal in size to the other letters and numbers on
such sign. Such signs shall not exceed two feet by three feet, shall be
permanently mounted with a minimum distance to the bottom of the sign of three
feet, and a maximum distance to the bottom of the sign of five feet, and shall
conform to all City codes, ordinances and regulations regarding erection and
construction. Layout of sign graphics shall be approved by the Director including
color, size of lettering, placement of information and identification symbols. In
no case shall any letters or numerals be less than two inches in height.
(c) No sign graphics of any type shall be attached to or displayed on any
attendant building except that a sign may be attached or incorporated into the
building design which specifies the hours of attendant duty, the location of keys
after attendant hours, the name, phone- number and license number of the licensee,
and any other information essential to the normal operation of the lot.
(d) All restricted access parking lots which engage in towing of
unauthorized motor vehicles shall post such practice on a sign at each lot
entrance. In addition, each such sign shall include the name and telephone number
of the tower used. Letters on such signs shall be at least one (1) inch in
height. Such signs shall not exceed one foot by two feet, and shall be located on
the same support or supports as the entrance sign required by subsection (b) of
this section, but below such entrance sign.
(e) No restricted access parking lot licensee shall charge, or allow to be
charged, any greater sum for parking a motor vehicle than is stated on the
entrance signs.
(f) All signs shall be kept in good condition and state of repair at all
times.
Sec. 17. Access to Building. Each restricted access parking lot shall
provide at least one driveway through the parking lot (which may be one -way)
giving clear access to the building or buildings served by the parking lot, with
an entrance to and exit from the driveway directly to a public street, so that
persons can be dropped off and picked up at such building or buildings, at any
time, without a claim check and without going through a motor vehicle reservoir
area.
Sec. 18. Variances. Any restricted access parking lot licensee, and any
persons applying for a restricted access parking lot license, who or which desires
a variance or variances from any of the requirements of this ordinance may file a
petition for such variance_or variances with the Director. The petition shall be
on forms provided by the Director. The petition shall be accompanied by plans
which clearly illustrate, to the satisfaction of the Director, the changes from
the plot plan or from the requirements of this ordinance which will result if the
variance or variances are granted. The petition together with said plans, and the
report of the Director, shall be submitted to the Council within thirty (30) days
after it is submitted to the Director. Provided, however, if the variance
petition is by a person applying for a restricted access parking lot license, then
the Director shall not submit such variance petition, plans and reports to the
Council until the Director has first determined that the application for a license
is complete and all requirements of this ordinance have been complied with, except
for the requirements described in and to be varied by the variance petition, but
the petition shall be submitted to the Council within thirty (30) days after such
determination is made. The Council shall hear and decide such petition within
sixty (60) days after submission of the petition to the Council. The Council may
grant the variance if it finds that the strict enforcement of the ordinance would
cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the petitioner's property
and not created by the petitioner, and that the grant of the variance is in
keeping with the spirit and intent of this ordinance. The act of creating a
restricted access parking lot, by itself, shall not be deemed a circumstance
created by the petitioner so as to disallow the grant of the requested variance or
variances. The Council, in granting a variance, may impose conditions to insure
compliance with the purpose and intent of this ordinance and to protect adjacent
properties.
Sec. 19. Unauthorized Use of Vehicles. No personnel of a restricted access
parking lot shall use or permit the use, for any purpose whatsoever, of any motor
vehicle left in such lot for parking unless authorized in writing by the owner or
person in charge of such vehicles.
Sec. 20. Transferring Vehicle to Another Lot. No restricted access parking
lot personnel shall transfer any motor vehicle to another parking lot without the
consent of the owner or person in charge of said vehicle unless such vehicle is in
such lot without permission or payment.
Sec. 21. Prohibited Acts. The licensee-of a restricted access parking lot
shall not permit the repairing (except in an emergency), dismantling or wrecking
of any motor vehicle, or the storage of any inoperable vehicles (as defined in
Ordinance No. 1031 of.the City) on the parking lot.
Sec. 22. Retroactive Effect. It is intended that this ordinance be
effective retroactively. Therefore, any parking lot which is a restricted access
parking lot on the effective date of this ordinance, within 120 days of the
effective date of this ordinance, shall obtain a license under this ordinance for
such parking lot, or cease operation as a restricted access parking lot.
Sec. 23. Penalty. Any person violating this ordinance shall'be subject to
the penalties set forth in Ordinance No. 175 of the City. Such penalties may be
imposed in addition to penalties allowed by this ordinance.
Sec. 24. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
immediately upon its passage and publication.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
Motion for adoption'of the ordinance was seconded by Member Paulus.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Ordinance adopted.
Member Rice moved Second Reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 171 -A33 as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 171 -A33
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 171
TO ADD LICENSE FEE FOR RESTRICTED ACCESS PARKING LOTS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Schedule A to Ordinance No. 171 is hereby amended by adding the
following thereto:
ORD. SEC.
NO. NO. PURPOSE OF FEE /CHARGE
824 6 Restricted Access Parking
Lot License
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be
its passage and publication.
ATTEST:
AMOUNT
$500.00
Renewals:
0 -50 parking spaces
51 -100 parking spaces
101 -200 parking spaces
Over 200 parking spaces
in full force and effect
FEE NO.
28a -1
$100.00
28a -2
150.00
28a -3
250.00
28a -4
400.00-
28a -5
immediately
upon
Mayor
City clerk
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Smith.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Ordinance adopted.
PUBLIC REARING CONDUCTED: ORDINANCE NO. 1322 - PROHIBITING SALE OF CIGARETTES FROM
VENDING MACHINES GRANTED FIRST READING Affidavits of Notice were presented,
approved and ordered placed on file. Sanitarian Dave Velde informed the Council
that there were several individuals present who would like to comment on the
proposed ordinance that would prohibit the sale of cigarettes from vending
machines. He then introduced Virginia McCollister, Community Health Services
Advisory Committee Chair.
Virginia McCollister stated that the Community Health Services Advisory Committee
has considered the proposed ordinance and would recommend its adoption. She
emphasized that cigarette smoking is a major public health issue and there has
been much publicity recently regarding efforts to help people quit smoking and the
difficulty when people start at a young age. Vending machines do provide open
access to a potential public health hazard and the Committee highly recommends
that cigarette vending machines be banned in the City.
Member Smith noted that the proposed effective date is July 1, 1990 and questioned
whether that would allow sufficient notice to vending machines licensees.
Sanitarian Velde advised that notices of the public hearing were sent to everyone
who owns cigarette vending machines in the City and all businesses who have
vending machines on site.
For the record, Mayor Richards noted the following correspondence: 1) Letter from
Sister Mary Madonna Ashton, Commissioner of Health, urging adoption of the
ordinance, and 2) Letter from Thomas A. Briant, attorney for Coalition for
Responsible Vending Sales in which the Coalition urged the Council to adopt the
state law to be effective August 1, 1990 which restricts the sale of cigarettes to
minors. Mayor Richards asked whether the state law would preempt the City from
adopting the proposed ordinance. Attorney Erickson opined that the state law is
restrictive in that it requires certain locations and controls for cigarette
vending machines. The statute states that the local governing body may adopt
rules or ordinances relating to vending machine sales of tobacco that are more
restrictive.
Mayor Richards then called for public comment on the proposed ordinance.
Speaking in opposition was Bill Schlink, Edina Car Care Unocal, 5415 W. 70th
Street, who said he owned a vending machine and objected because the vending sales
are a portion of his income. He asked if adopted could he under the ordinance
retain his vending machine, place it behind the counter and operate it himself.
Attorney Erickson submitted that could be interpreted as over the counter sales
and, in his opinion, would be permitted under the ordinance.
Speaking in support were: Sandra Sandell, Executive Director of Association for
Non - Smokers of Minnesota, 1421 Park Avenue; Arlene Wilson, 4707 Townes Road; Ann
Rutledge, 5116 Ridge Road; Ann Charity, 5116 Ridge Road; and Ann Carlander, 6800
Indian Hills Road.
Mayor Richards raised the issue as to whether this is the right approach to the
problem of smoking because it would be preventing just one part of cigarette
sales. He said we may be getting into an issue that may not be appropriate for
local government and that should be addressed in a broader forum. Arlene Wilson
observed that it may be desirable'to do this on a larger scale but pointed out
that the tobacco companies spend $3.5 Billion just on advertising cigarettes and
they have tremendous power at the state and national level. They do not have as
much power on the local grass roots level and therefore changes can be made at the
local level within the community. Ann Charity commented that, if the Council is
concerned about whether this is a community concern, 22 communities in the state
have passed partial bans of cigarette vending machines and 18 communities have
passed total bans.
Member Kelly introduced Ordinance No. 1322 for First Reading as recommended.by the
Community Health Services Advisory Committee and as presented and on file in the
office of the City Clerk. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus.
Member Smith commented that the state statute to be effective August 1, 1990
places some burden on those who own cigarette vending machines: 1) That they -be
electronically activated, or 2) That tokens be used to activate them. Secondly,
we are talking about a method of distribution and the proposed ordinance would be
an effective control. He said he strongly supported passage of the ordinance.
Member Rice indicated that he intended to support the ordinance and if adopted he
would interpret it to mean that all cigarette vending machines must go.
Thomas Briant, stated he was legal counsel for the Coalition for Responsible
Vending Sales. In April 1990, Governor Perpich signed a law that would regulate
cigarette vending machines statewide. He pointed out that most of the cigarette
vending machines in Edina are in factory locations, warehouses or office
buildings. Very few family type restaurants have a vending machine. It is the
Coalition's belief that under the state law those machines are not generally
accessible by minors. Minnesota Viking Food Service, one of the largest vending
companies in the state, is located in Edina and they offer their employees the
service of a cigarette vending machine. Under the ordinance proposed by the
Council they would not be able to offer that service. Mr. Briant said they see
the state law as a reasonable compromise to a ban - a reasonable solution that
seeks to put restrictions on cigarette vending machines. He presented a short
video tape showing the locking device for cigarette vending machines, mandated by
the state.law, that would prevent minors from buying cigarettes from machines.
Mr. Briant concluded by stating that what the local vending companies are asking
is to look at this compromise and allow it to work for at least a year - let them
show that the devices can work in public areas and that minors will be prevented
from purchasing cigarettes - instead of imposing a total ban.
Member Paulus observed that children see vending machines as a very harmless
machine - it is what gives them candy, pop, and what they see as the joys of life.
She said she would not be comfortable with even one cigarette vending machine in
the City. Because the City has cooperated with the School District to try to get
our young people to be anti - tobacco, we would not be working with the School
District if we allow cigarette vending machines.
Mayor Richards then called for rollcall vote on the motion on the floor.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
First Reading granted.
Member Paulus then made a motion to waive Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1322.
Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Mayor Richards said this is an important
issue and the City would not be regulating but prohibiting. In fairness to all
who may wish to be heard before adoption of the ordinance he said he could not
support the motion.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Smith
Nays: Rice, Richards
Motion failed.
Mayor Richards then informed the audience that Second Reading of the Ordinance
would be on the July 2, 1990 Council Agenda.
*BID AWARDED FOR STORM SETTER IMPROVEMENT NOS. STS -204. STS -205 AND STS -206 Motion
was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Paulus for award of bid for
Storm Sewer Improvement Nos. STS -205, STS -205 and STS -206 to recommended low
bidder, CCS Contracting, at $28,176.40.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
BID AWARDED FOR GOLF BALLS FOR DRIVING RANGE- BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE Member Paulus
asked if the fees to use the driving range covered the cost of the golf balls.
Manager Rosland said that the cost is covered in the fees. Member Paulus' motion
was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for golf balls for the driving range
at Braemar Golf Course to recommended low bidder, Spalding, at $8,250.00.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice,_Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*BID AWARDED FOR SODDING OF BRAEMAR SOCCER/FOOTBALL FIELD Motion was made by
Member Smith and was seconded by Member Paulus for award of bid for sodding of
Braemar soccer /football field to recommended low bidder, Perkins Landscape
Contractors, at $14,739.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF 6/12/90 APPROVED Engineer Hoffman reviewed
the action in the Minutes of June 12, 1990 as recommended by Traffic Safety
Committee. Mike Hogan, 5808 Johnson Drive, spoke to item (1) in Section A of the
Minutes and said he would still like to see a four -way "STOP" at the intersection
of Johnson Drive and Grove Street.
Motion was made by Member Smith to approve the following recommended action listed
in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of June 12, 1990:
1) To install a 25 m.p.h. advisory speed and pedestrian sign for each direction
of travel on Johnson Drive,
2) To install the universal "T" intersection sign on northbound Schaefer Road and
also to encourage clear view compliance in the area,
3) To pass on to the City Council the Committee's approval of the recommendations
to (a) install a "LEFT TURN ARROW" on northbound France at West 49 1/2 Street,
and (b) a "LEFT TURN ARROW" on southbound France at West 50th Street, and
further that the Council solicit the approval of Hennepin County and the City
of Minneapolis in these efforts,
4) To install a "YIELD" sign on westbound Indian Hills Road at Dakota Trail,
5) To minimally stripe the triangle intersection of Northwood Drive and Dundee
Road,
6) That no additional traffic control.devices be installed on West 42nd Street
and that the recommendation of the Committee for sidewalks be reconsidered,F
and to acknowledge Sections B and C of the Minutes.
Motion was seconded by Member Rice.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
FEASIBILITY REPORT PRESENTED: STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NOS. STS -207 AND STS -208
ORDERED Engineer Hoffman presented a feasibility report for the following
proposed projects, advising that staff has reviewed them and they are feasible and
consistent with the overall development plans for the City:
Improvement Estimated Cost
Storm Sewer No. STS -207 $180,000.00
Storm Sewer No. STS -208 4,799.76
Storm Sewer Project No. STS -207 - Engineer Hoffman said this is a storm sewer pipe
running from the new Galleria expansion to Centennial Lakes via the City park
strip which will also serve as the Southdale transit way in future years. The
project is proposed to be funded by the City except that the developer shall pay
construction costs in excess of $175,000. It will provide a new storm sewer to
service the Galleria expansion. The project should be approved subject to
appropriate easements and developer's agreement which would waive the right to any
special assessment notice and appeal.
Member Smith asked what the Galleria would be assessed for. Engineer Hoffman said
that the Gallerie will be paying for transit way work to be done beneath the
Galleria as part of the plan approval for the Galleria expansion approved by the
Council on April 16, 1990 and the City will be putting in that part of the storm
sewer pipe off the site. If the developer does not do the transit work the City
may do it and assess the costs against the Galleria. Also, if the developer does
not pay the costs of constructing the storm sewer in excess of $175,000, then that
excess can be assessed against the developer.
HRA Executive Director Hughes recalled that, when the Galleria expansion was
approved, the Council had authorized financial participation in the construction
of the transit way beneath the Galleria not to exceed $175,000. Member Smith
asked if the City is paying for the right of way for the transit way through the
Galleria site. Director Hughes stated that the right of way is being dedicated by
the owner of the property.
Mayor Richards introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption, subject
to easements and developer's agreement:
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows:
1. It is hereby determined that, in accordance with the Development Agreement
between the City of Edina ( "City ") and Gabbert and Gabbert Company ( "Developer ")
for the Galleria Expansion, the City shall proceed with the construction of a
storm sewer improvement from the Galleria to Centennial Lakes, including all
proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of
necessary easements and rights for construction and maintenance of such
improvement; that said improvement is hereby designated and shall be referred to
in all subsequent proceedings as:
STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. STS -207.
2. The City shall pay the cost of construction thereof, up to a total amount of
$175,000.00. If the cost is in excess of $175,000.00 such excess shall be paid by
Developer to City, which excess cost may be assessed against the property of the
Developer described as: Tracts A,C and D, Registered Land Survey No. 1171, .Tracts
A and B, Registered Land Survey No. 1366, except that part of said Tract B
embraced within Registered Land Survey No. 1466; Tracts A,B and C. Registered Land
Survey No. 1466.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Rice.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards
Abstained: Smith
Resolution adopted.
Storm Sewer Project No. STS -208 - Engineer Hoffman explained that this project is
a small pipe to be connected to -the France Avenue storm sewer which will improve
drainage for the backyard areas east of France Avenue and south of West 57th
Street. This project is similar to several other small projects which provided
additional drainage to prevent localized flooding and property damage which
occurred during the frozen ground rainfall event on March 11, 1990. The project
is proposed to be funded by the stormwater utility fund, subject to appropriate
easements being granted.
Jay Kosters, 5701 France Avenue, spoke in support of the proposed project saying
it would help to prevent flooding on his property as well as that of his neighbor
next door.
Member Paulus introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption, subject
to easements being granted by the property owners:
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows:
1. It is hereby determined that the City shall proceed with the construction of a
storm sewer improvement, including all proceedings which may be necessary in
eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights for
construction and maintenance of such improvement; that said improvement is hereby
designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as:
STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. STS -208,
cost of which shall be paid from the Stormwater Utility Fund.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Smith.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Resolution adopted.
(Member Kelly had left the meeting temporarily.)
Member Paulus introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND
DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS -
FOR STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NOS. STS -207 AND STS -208
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA;
1. The plans and specifications for the proposed improvements set forth in the
following Advertisement for Bids form, heretofore prepared by the City Engineer,
and now on file in the office of the City Clerk are hereby approved.
2. The Clerk shall cause to be published in the Edina Sun and Construction
Bulletin the following notice of bids for improvements:
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
STORM SEWERS
CONTRACT 90 -8 (ENG)
IMPROVEMENT NOS. STS -207 A STS -208
BIDS CLOSE JULY 12, 1990
SEALED BIDS vill be received and opened in the Council Chambers in Edina City
Hall, 4801 West 50th Street at 11:00 A.K., Thursday, July 12, 1990. The Edina
City Council will meet at 7:00 P.M., Monday, July 16, 1990 to consider said bids.
The following are approximate major quantities:
2,040 CF 36" Storm Sever
6 EA Std. Manholes
500 TONS Cl. 5A Gravel
245 TONS Bituminous Paving
3.5 ACRES Seeding
Bids shall be in a sealed envelope vith a statement thereon shoving the vork
covered by the bids. Bids should be addressed to the City Engineer, City of
Edina, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424, and may be mailed or
submitted personally to the City Engineer. Bids received by the City Engineer,
either through the mail or by personal submission, after the time set for
receiving them may be returned unopened.
Work must be done as described in plans and specifications on file in the office
of the City Clerk. Plans and specifications are available for a deposit of $25.00
(by check). Said deposit to be returned upon return of the plans and
specifications vith a bona fide bid. No bids will be considered unless sealed and
accompanied by bid bond or certified check payable to the City of Edina in the
amount of at least ten (10) percent of all bids. All plans mailed, enclose
separate check for $5.00 payable to the City of Edina for postage and handling.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL.
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Rice.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Resolution adopted.
UPDATE PRESENTED ON STORMWATER UTILITY - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Engineer Hoffman
presented background information on the City's storm water drainage system. He
referred to data in the City's Comprehensive Plan, noting that the Plan needs an
update dependent on the outcome of the approval of the Chapter 509 Plans that have
been prepared by the Nine Mile Creek and Minnehaha Creek Watershed Districts.
Those plans have not received full .approval of the Board of Water Resources.
Staff has been reviewing projects in the past two years based on needed
reconstruction due to pipe systems age, adding small amount of piping to reduce
localized flooding problems, and /or changed systems to lower the overall flood
potential with cooperation from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District.
The major emphasis during the 1990's will be attempting to implement, where
possible, Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP) retrofits. The essence of this
type of change is to improve water quality through development of ponding areas to
collect sediment to prevent further pollution of the natural creek areas of Nine
Mile and Minnehaha Creeks. A classic example of a NURP project is Centennial
Lakes which will provide a system to service much of the greater Southdale area.
Additionally, existing systems will be analyzed with the objective of lowering
flood potential in response to the numerous phone calls since the Federal flood
disaster of 1987. Another issue that needs to be addressed is the ultimate need
to dredge existing ponding areas and the related special benefit issue involving
property owners abutting water bodies.
Engineer Hoffman then made a comprehensive graphics presentation depicting the
areas which have received some work recently and those areas that will be under
review for additional work in the near future. Potential cost of these projects
in the next several years are estimated at approximately $4 Million, including
Centennial Lakes. Engineer Hoffman concluded the update report by stating that
the graphics and report data would be on file in his office for anyone seeking
further information.
*WINE LICENSE RENEWALS APPROVED Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded
by Member Paulus to approve On -Sale Wine License renewals for the following
restaurants: Dayton's Boundary Waters Restaurant, Bravol Ristorante Italiano, Vie
de France Restaurant and the Good Earth.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
WINE LICENSE RENEWAL APPROVED FOR THE PANTRY RESTAURANT Manager Rosland referred
to the Police Department report regarding renewal of the on -sale wine license for
The Pantry, 5101 Arcadia Avenue, which indicated that a licensed manager was not
present on several occasions when inspections were made. Approval was recommended
with the further recommendation that the restaurant be inspected on a monthly
basis until full compliance is established or notice to the Council if the same
condition is found.
Member Rice suggested that the issue of the ordinance requirement that a licensed
manager be present when wine is being served be reviewed by the Council.
Motion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Paulus to approve the
on -sale vine license renewal for The Pantry restaurant.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED ACCEPTING GIFT TO CITY OF OUTLOT B. LAKE PAMELA Manager
Rosland presented the recommendation of the Park Board to accept Outlot B in Lake
Pamela as a gift to the City. The owner, Duane Bakken, 6016 Halifax Avenue, has
indicated to the Park Board that he would like to donate Outlot B in Pamela Park
to the City of Edina as all of the outlot is under water. Property taxes on the
outlot in 1989 were $205.00 with no special assessments on the property.
Member Rice introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the owner of the parcel identified as Outlot B, LAKE PAMELA (PIN
19- 028- 24 -44- 0027), according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, desires to donate said Outlot B to the City of Edina;
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota that it hereby
accepts the donation of Outlot B, LAKE PAMELA.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Smith.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
(Member Kelly had left -the meeting temporarily.)
POLICY FOR COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT ON CURB CUTS/DRIVEWAYS AFFIRMED Engineer Hoffman
informed the Council that a request has been made for use of different driveway
material and an additional curb cut to construct a circular driveway for a lot in
the Country Club District. The pre'sent staff position for the Country Club
District, which has been in place for many years, is that only one driveway
opening should be allowed and the material for public sidewalk, outwalk and
driveway be. standard concrete, based on the size of the lots and to maintain a
consistent general streetscape appearance.
The proposal submitted to staff is to allow paver brick in lieu of plain concrete.
Currently, in the Country Club District, many types of materials have been used on
the property owner side of the public sidewalk for both driveways and walkways.
Staff would ask Council direction on this issue in light of the overall massing
issue which is currently under study.
Member Smith made a motion to affirm the staff position for the Country Club
District that the material for sidewalk on the public right of way be standard
concrete. Motion was seconded by Member Rice.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
Member Paulus made a motion to affirm the staff position for the Country Club
District that the material for driveway from the sidewalk to the street be
standard concrete. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
Member Paulus made a motion to affirm the staff position for the Country Club
District that each platted lot be allowed one curb cut only or share a driveway
with an adjoining property. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
UPDATE PRESENTED ON I -494 EIS PROCESS Member Paulus reported that at the last
I -494 Project Management Team (PMT) meeting the members were told that Hennepin
County will send a representative to the I -494 Project Management team but they
will not financially support the program. In reviewing this with the Office of
the Attorney General, it was pointed out that Hennepin County did enter into the
contract and therefore should be held to the terms of the contract including the
financial aspect. MNDOT's position was that the program should be suspended until
Hennepin County comes back to the table with their dollars.
Member Paulus elaborated that the feeling of many of the municipalities and the
private sector (represented by Larry Laukka) was that MNDOT's position was not
appropriate and that we should go ahead and, if necessary, take legal action
against to bring Hennepin County back into the program. The reasoning was that
this may cause other members of the PMT to withdraw from the program which would
result in an unsuccessful project. She mentioned that this is the first joint
effort that has been undertaken on a highway project and the program has been
moving ahead. As representatives of the City of Edina, Member Paulus said she and
Engineer Hoffman could not support the position of MNDOT concerning the action
taken by Hennepin County. She asked for direction from the Council on the issue.
Engineer Hoffman mentioned that MNDOT is the agency running the I -494 EIS process
and, obviously, does have the most to say about it. The Metropolitan Council is
attempting to get MNDOT and Hennepin County together to talk about the situation.
He said he was particularly concerned that if the private sector component did not
see progress on a regular basis they would walk away. He emphasized that the
cooperation of the private sector is very important in the overall project to
manage traffic on I -494.
Following some discussion, it was the consensus of the Council to defer action
until the Council Meeting of July 2, 1990 and that staff draft a letter for the
Mayor's signature to Larry Laukka, representing the private sector, advising him
that the Council will consider taking action on July 2 if MNDOT and Hennepin
County have not resolved the issue by that time.
SCHEDULE FOR 1991 BUDGET HEARINGS APPROVED Finance Director John Wallin presented
a proposed schedule for 1991 Budget hearings. The state mandated Truth in
Taxation Hearing dates (November 15 to December 20) will be determined after the
county and school district have selected their dates. Following discussion, the
following schedule was approved:
July
16
Budget
Assumptions
5 -7 p.m.
Council Room
Aug
23
Budget
Hearing
5 -7 p.m.
Manager's Conference Room
Aug
28
Budget
Hearing
5 -7 p.m.
Manager's Conference Room
Aug
29
Budget
Hearing
5 -7 p.m.
Manager's Conference Room
The issue of advertising the proposed dates in the Edina Sun - Current, in addition
to publishing the mandated Truth in Taxation Hearing date, was raised by Member
Smith. After considerable discussion, staff was asked to format an advertisement,
obtain a cost estimate for publishing thereof and bring the information back for
Council consideration.
ANN PROPOSAL PRESENTED Manager Rosland directed the Council's attention to a
proposal from the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM) for
implementation of recommendations made by,the AMM Mission and Membership Services
Task Force which has just completed a year long evaluation and assessment of the
AMM's mission, focus and general operations. The Task Force report contained a
'blueprint for action' which if implemented should enable the AMM to remain a
reliable and relevant tool for member cities into the 90's.. However, it would
require an additional staff member which could result in a dues increase of 20 to
25 %. AMM has asked that this be placed on member city council agendas for
discussion and action prior to August 1, 1990.
Mayor Richards said that it has been so long since we have challenged the
existence of some of these organizations that they seem to be self - perpetuating
and take for granted that money will be forthcoming.
Following discussion on the proposal, it was the consensus of the Council that
staff bring back a draft letter asking the AMM staff to get together with all the
other organizations of which the City is a member to discuss how Edina and other
cities are best represented on issues rather than being members of a multitude of
organizations and not knowing who is really speaking for and on behalf of Edina,
or like cities, or all cities.
PAUL GENS LETTER CONCERNING SHHSC REPRESENTATION DISCUSSED Manager Rosland
referred to a letter dated May 30, 1990 from Paul A. Gens in which he stated he
was resigning from the Board of Directors of South Hennepin Human Services Council
effective June 1, 1990 and wished to be re- appointed after July 8, 1990. The
request was made in order that he could assume the temporary duties as Board
liaison overseeing the day to day operation of South Hennepin until a permanent
director is in place.
Following discussion on the resignation and request for reappointment, it was the
consensus of the Council that Manager Rosland inform Mr. Gens that he had two
options: 1) either cease being liaison and stay on the Board of Directors, or
2) to continue as liaison the Council would accept his resignation without an
automatic reappointment.
CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Paulus to
approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register
dated 06/18/90 and consisting of 33 pages: General Fund $1,254,166.85,
Communications $11,514.26, Art. Center $3,442.55, Swimming Pool Fund $8,124.36,
Golf Course Fund $172,904.42, Recreation Center Fund $72,527.60, Gun Range Fund
$80.00, Edinborough Park $11,695.00, Utility Fund $24,805.89, Storm Sewer Utility
$153.16, Liquor Dispensary Fund $113,865.18, Construction Fund $453,062.80, IMP
Bond Redemption #2 $50,925.00, Total $2,177,267.07, and for confirmation of
payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated
05/31/90 and consisting of 20 pages: General Fund $280,787.13, Communications
$2,869.96, Art Center $3,550.68, Swimming Pool Fund $68.30, Golf Course Fund
$11,017.55, Recreation Center Fund $7,231.25, Gun Range Fund $477.01, Edinborough
Park $6,487.41, Utility Fund $21,323.80, Storm Sewer Utility $474.03, Liquor
Dispensary Fund $281,444.52, Total $615,731.64.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the
meeting adjourned at 10:45 p.m.
City Clerk
f
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
JULY 2, 1990
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor
Richards.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by
Member Smith to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented, with the
exception of the removal of item VI.B - Filter System - Municipal Pool.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF JOINT HRA /COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 4 1990 AND REGULAR MEETINGS OF
MAY 7 AND MAY 21, 1990 APPROVED Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded
by Member Smith to approve the minutes of the Joint HRA /Council Meeting of June 4,
1990 and the Regular Meetings of May 7 and May 21, 1990.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*RESOLUTION ADOPTED APPROVING JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR
CDBG FUNDS Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Smith for
adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that it hereby
authorizes and directs the Mayor and Manager to execute, on behalf of the City,
the Joint Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County (Contract No. A04790) to
continue the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program for
federal fiscal years 1991, 1992 and 1993.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*HEARING DATE OF 7/16/90 SET FOR PLANNING MATTERS Motion was made by Member
Paulus and was seconded by Member Smith setting July 16, 1990 as hearing date for
the following Planning matters:
1) Preliminary Plat Approval- Lindell Addition - Lot 1, Block 1, Danen's Meadows
(7017 Antrim Road)
2) Amendment to Edina Comprehensive Plan - Community Facilities Element - Park
Plan.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
ORDINANCE NO. 1322 (LICENSING AND REGULATING SALE OF CIGARETTES) ADOPTED ON SECOND
READING Mayor Richards stated that on June 18, 1990 the Council held a public
hearing to consider Ordinance No. 1322 which would prohibit the sale of cigarettes
by ending machine. After hearing public testimony, the Council granted First
Reading of the ordinance and scheduled Second Reading for July 2, 1990. It was
noted that on June 20 the Edina Sun - Current published an article describing the
testimony at the public hearing and the action taken by the Edina City Council.
The article stated that final consideration of the Ordinance would be heard on
July 2, 1990.
Mayor Richards then called for questions and /or comments on proposed Ordinance
No. 1322. No comment or objection was heard.
Member Rice moved Second Reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 1322 as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 1322
AN ORDINANCE LICENSING AND REGULATING THE
SALE OF CIGARETTES, TERMINATING LICENSES FOR
EXISTING CIGARETTE VENDING MACHINES, IMPOSING
A PENALTY AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 1321
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
1
Section 1. License Required No person shall keep cigarettes for retail sale
or sell cigarettes at retail in the City of Edina unless such person shall have in
effect a valid license to do so obtained from the City of Edina.
Sec. 2. License Procedure and Control: Penalties. The provisions of
Ordinance No. 141 of the City, including the enforcement and penalty provisions
thereof, shall apply to all licenses required by this ordinance and to the holders
of such licenses.
Sec. 3. Applications. The applicant shall state the following in the
application for a license in addition to the information required by Ordinance
No. 141 of the City:
a) The applicant's name and business address;
b) The telephone number at the business in the City of Edina where
cigarettes are to be sold; and
c) The location or locations in the City of Edina where the sale of
cigarettes is proposed to be conducted.
Sec. 4. License Fee. The license fee shall be as provided in Ordinance
No. 171 of the City.
Sec. 5. Rules and Regulations.
(a) No license shall be issued for the sale of cigarettes at a movable place
of business.
(b) No person shall sell any cigarette to any person under the age of 18
years.
(c) No person shall sell or keep for sale any cigarette containing any
controlled substance as defined in Ordinance No. 1014 of the City, except
nicotine or tobacco.
(d) No person shall be granted a license for, or permit, any vending machine
to be used to sell cigarettes to any person.
Sec. 6. Termination of Existing Licenses for Vending Machines. All licenses
previously issued by the City for vending machines to sell cigarettes in the City
of Edina are revoked as of August 1, 1990. License fees paid for such revoked
licenses shall be refunded pro rata based on the then remaining term of the
license, upon application made by the licensee for such refund.
Sec. 7. Violation to be Reported. The Chief of Police or his/her deputy
shall notify the City Manager or his/her designated representative of any
violation of any of the provisions of this ordinance.
Sec. 8. Penalty. Any person violating this ordinance shall be subject to
the penalties set forth in Ordinance No. 175 of the City. Such penalties may be
imposed in addition to suspension or revocation of license as provided in
Ordinance No. 141 of the City, or impounding of a vending machine or machines.'
Sec. 9. Repealer. Ordinance No. 1321 of the City is hereby repealed in its
entirety.
Sec. 10. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
immediately upon its passage and publication.
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Smith.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Ordinance adopted.
CONCERN OF RESIDENT HEARD REGARDING POLICY ON CURB CUTS /DRIVEWAY MATERIALS FOR
COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT DISCUSSED Mayor Richards recalled that at the meeting of
June 18, 1990, the Council took action to give direction to staff and to reaffirm
existing policy concerning curb cuts, sidewalk and driveway materials for the
Country Club District as follows:
rf
1) The material for sidewalk on the public right of way be standard concrete.
2) The material for driveway from the sidewalk to the street be standard
concrete.
3) Each platted lot be allowed one curb cut only or share a driveway with an
adjoining property.
The matter was brought to the Council because a request had been received for use
of different driveway material and approval of a circular driveway.
Dr. Christian Schrock, 4500 Drexel Avenue, referred to his letter dated June 26,
1990 in which he asked to be placed on the Council Agenda to discuss the policy on
curb cuts and driveway materials for the Country Club District. He said that
neither he nor his landscaper were notified that his request would be discussed at
the last Council meeting and he felt that they had a right to present the
rationale and background for their proposal.
Dr. Schrock presented a schematic of his property and explained that their home is
located at a busy intersection - the corner of Sunnyside and Drexel. When backing
out of their driveway traffic can be coming from five directions. They have found
it very difficult and have experienced several near accidents. Dr. Schrock said
they want to avoid any dangerous situations for their upcoming teenage drivers and
thought that a circular driveway would be a logical solution. Because they are
concerned with maintaining the integrity of the architecture and historic
standards of the Country Club District they felt that what they are proposing
would improve the beauty of the home and preserve its integrity. The material for
the circular driveway would be brick pavers similar to the pavers installed at
Edina Country Club and would be more durable than concrete. He pointed out that
their lot frontage is 224 feet and the proposed circular driveway would only take
up one -third of that frontage. In addition, they would put in wrought iron
fencing and attractive plantings to enhance the landscaping.
Mayor Richards asked Dr. Schrock if they or their landscape architect had
considered a turn - around area as an alternative so that they could drive out
facing the street to address their concern about safety. Dr. Schrock said that it
looking at their yard they felt the circular driveway would be best. Mayor
Richards said he was specifically concerned with treating everyone fairly. If the
Council allows one homeowner to vary from the standards it sets a precedent and
the potential for others coming in with similar requests. What is proposed would
create 'a lot of hard surface and something that can and should be considered is a
turn - around area for individual properties. Mayor Richards assured Dr. Schrock
that a fair presentation was made as to the policy on multiple curb cuts on
individual properties throughout the Country Club District. Dr. Schrock argued
that the way to solve this is to look at which properties have enough frontage to
support the concept of a turn - around. There are not too many that have enough
frontage to make that feasible. What should be considered is allowing circular
driveways for those lots having a certain amount of frontage. He submitted that
the Curtis property in the Country Club District has a circular driveway with less
frontage than that of his property.
Member Rice commented that he would not be in favor of two curb cuts as proposed.
The existing fence creates somewhat of a hazard for backing out and he felt the
site plan could be reviewed as to a turn - around. He said he was concerned about
comments in Dr. Schrock's letter that they were mislead by staff. Manager Rosland
explained that the proposal was brought to staff last winter-prior to the
development of the massing issue. Staff was sensitized further when the issue of
lot coverage in the Country Club District was brought up and felt the specific
proposal should be brought to the Council before any permits were granted.
Engineer Hoffman affirmed that the Schrocks were somewhat victims of the process
because the City was in a period of transition on the massing issue. Mrs. Schrock
reviewed the sequence of events beginning with the first time a rough sketch of
I
their proposal was brought to the Planning Department until June 22 when they were
told of the policy denying more than one curb cut in the Country Club District.
She said they had spent a lot of time, effort and money on the plan for the
circular driveway and had relied on information that they were complying with
requirements. Dr. Schrock commented that he felt the policy was created after the
fact and that their personal rights were violated. Mayor Richards commented that
the Council can empathize with the Schrock's position but that the final decision
is the Council's responsibility. There is a process involved and until a permit
is actually issued there is no approval.
Mayor Richards concluded by saying that the Council had re- affirmed the long
standing policy for the Country Club District at the last meeting. He then
reiterated the policy as it pertains to: 1) material for sidewalk on the public
right of way, 2) material for driveway from the sidewalk to the street, and 3)
curb cuts and asked the Council members to state if they wished to depart from the
existing policy. Hearing no comment, Mayor Richards stated that the existing
policy stands for the.Country Club District.
Al Hipps, landscape architect, observed that from the beginning of his involvement
with the Shrocks, they were given optimism at the staff level that what they were
proposing was going to be acceptable to the City and that at no time during the
whole process were these issues brought up. He said what is frustrating is that
there does not seem to be any concrete document that pertains to the Country Club
area. Further, the City is full of circular driveways, paver driveways, and
downtown Edina has brick paver areas between the curbs and sidewalks. Mr. Hipps
concluded with the comment that•the Shrocks have spent a lot of time and energy in
trying to develop a project within the integrity of the Country Club area and that
it was frustrating to find out that this was brought to the Council two weeks ago
and that no one told them it was being discussed so that they could be a part of
the hearing.
PETITION REGARDING CONDITION OF ALLEY IN 5100 BLOCK BETWEEN BEDFORD AND OXFORD
AVENUES REFERRED TO ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FOR RECOMMENDATION Manager Rosland
presented a petition dated June 28, 1990, signed by residents on Bedford and
Oxford Avenues regarding the current condition of the service alley located on the
5100 block. They requested the City to investigate alternative measures, outside
of the normal assessment process, that could be taken towards pavement of the
alley.
David Morris, 5116 Bedford Avenue, spoke for the residents who had signed the
petition. He explained that the condition of the alley is dependent on weather
conditions. In dry weather, the passage of each vehicle creates a large cloud of
dust; in wet weather the surface erodes leaving deep ruts and puddles. He
presented photos depicting the deteriorating condition of the alley. As stated in
their letter, due to the arrangement of different styles of homes constructed on
properties abutting the alley, the pavement issue has never been resolved. Half
of the properties have detached garages which are accessed from the alley while
the other half have attached garages which are accessed from the street. Also,
some of the properties are rental properties where the non - resident property owner
is not directly affected. For these reasons all previous attempts to petition for
paving the alley through the assessment process have failed. He said the property
owners who use the alley are somewhat in agreement that the residents who do not
use the alley directly should not.have to incur the same amount of cost as those
who would be directly benefitted.
Mr. Morris said the affected residents are asking for a variance in the petition
system so that the alley could be paved and any assessed charges be fairly
pro -rated so that property owners actually using the alley would pay a greater
share. Also, they are asking if the ongoing upkeep cost savings to the City could
be applied towards the cost of the paving.
Jeff Brice, 5124 Bedford Avenue, mentioned that some-ground supporting the
abutting paved driveways is being washed away. Also, snow plowing has lowered the
level of the alley and nothing is being added to bring the level back up.
Wendy Morris, 5116 Bedford Avenue, commented that the gravel from the alley
constantly washes out onto the street and has created a dangerous situation for
children riding bikes. She said the petitioners are asking for a minimum upgrade
of the alley from its present condition.
Mayor Richards asked when the last petition for paving the alley was presented.
Engineer Hoffman said it probably was in the early 1970's. He explained that the
policy of the City is to pick up 25% of the cost of concrete paving for alleys,
because of its durability and ease in maintaining, but nothing for asphalt. He
suggested that the petition be referred to the Engineering staff for review and
cost estimates and be brought back for public hearing.
Member•Smith made a motion to refer the petition for paving of the alley in the
5100 block between Bedford and Oxford Avenues to the Engineering Department for
processing and recommendation. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*BID AWARDED FOR ASBESTOS ABATEMENT IN BOILER ROOM - CITY HALL Motion was made by
Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for asbestos
abatement in the boiler room of City Hall to recommended low bidder, EnviroNet,
Inc., at $7,078.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
EMERGENCY REPAIR APPROVED FOR FILTER SYSTEM - MQNICIPAL POOL Manager Rosland
explained that.the filter system for the municipal pool was an emergency
installation because health standards require separate filtration systems for
wading pools and the pool could not be opened until the system had been repaired.
Staff would recommend funding from the developers fund because this repair is not
within the current budget. Member Rice questioned whether this expenditure should
come out of the developers fund. Manager Rosland said that would be appropriate
because the municipal pool is a City -wide facility.
Member Rice made a motion to approve the emergency repair of the filter system for
the municipal pool to All American Mechanical, Inc. at $8,492.00 to be funded out
of the developers fund. Motion was seconded by Member Smith.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*EMERGENCY CHANGE -OVER APPROVED FOR ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER - BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Smith to approve the
emergency change -over for the electric transformer at Braemar Golf Course to Metro
Electric at $8,765.44.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR TENNIS COURT RESURFACING Motion was made by Member Paulus and
was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for resurfacing five tennis courts
to recommended low bidder, Gopher State Sealcoat, Inc., at $11,750.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
INSURANCE RENEWALS APPROVED FOR GENERALAIQUOR LIABILITY WORKERS' COMPENSATION
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY. PROPERTY, AND EQUIPMENT Manager Rosland presented the
following quotes for general /liquor liability, workers' compensation and
automobile liability insurance:
Home Insurance Company $497,224.00
League of MN Cities . 506,420.00
St. Paul Fire & Marine 741,686.00
The quotation from Home Insurance represents a 23% decrease in premium costs over
last year. The insurance from Home Insurance is a retro rated program and because
of a substantial drop in claims this past policy year the City is receiving a
lower quotation. In addition to the favorable rate, the City this year will
receive a retro adjustment check in the amount of $238,273.00. The City's total
retro adjustment for the five years on the program is $567,777.00. Staff would
recommend renewal with Home Insurance Company.
Member Kelly made a motion to approve renewal of general /liquor liability,
workers' compensation, automobile liability, property and equipment insurance
coverage with Home Insurance Company, low quote, in the amount of $497,224.00.
Motion was seconded by Member Rice.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
Manager Rosland presented the following quotes for property insurance-
Hartford Insurance $ 43,669.00
Affiliated Insurance 48,269.00
He advised that the broker, Frank B. Hall & Co., went to four additional markets
on behalf of the City. Three of the four markets would not provide a quotation
because they could not compete with the Hartford Insurance program. Hartford's
renewal rate is the same as last year in spite of a $100,000 fire loss at the Golf
Dome. Staff would recommend renewal with Hartford Insurance.
Member Rice made a motion to approve renewal of property insurance with Hartford
Insurance Company, low quote, in the amount of $43,669.00.
Motion was seconded by Member Paulus.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
Manager Rosland presented the following quotes for equipment insurance:
Fireman's Fund $ 6,361.00
Home Insurance 7,010.00
St. Paul Companies 7,456.00
This is insurance on the City's equipment other than automobiles, items such as
sweepers, loaders and generally large equipment. The quote reflects no increase
in premium. Staff would recommend renewal with Fireman's Fund.
Member Smith made a motion to approve renewal of equipment insurance with
Fireman's Fund, low quote, in the amount of $6,361.00.
Motion was seconded by Member Rice.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
PROPOSAL FOR APARTMENT RECYCLING PROGRAM APPROVED: ORDINANCES TO BE DRAFTED Janet
Chandler, Recycling Coordinator, presented the recommendation and proposal of the
Recycling Commission for a recycling program for apartments and condominiums
summarized as follows:
Background Data - As a first step in the planning process a letter was sent to all
Edina apartment and condominium managers /owners and all Edina garbage haulers
advising that an apartment recycling policy in under consideration.
Research indicated: Total dwelling units in City 21,237
Units now in City program 13,684
Propose to add (8 units or less) 230
Total City program 13,914
Condominium units 3,614 (2,158 recycling)
Apartment units 3,709 ( 323 recycling)
12 garbage haulers serve Edina
4 haulers provide recycling service
1 recycling only hauler serving apartments
Most haulers willing /equipped to provide recycling service
Policy Considerations
1) Should there be one recycling hauler city -wide for apartments?
Recommendation: Keep an open system for apartment recycling.
2) Should the City mandate apartment recycling? If so, to whom should the mandate
apply?
Recommendation: Effective January 1991: a) require apartments /condominiums to
set up recycling programs, b) include apartment and condominium residents in
the source separation requirements of Ordinance 715, and c) require haulers to
provide recycling service to apartments and condominiums.
3) Should the City fund apartment recycling? If so, to what extent?
Recommendation: If Council chooses to fund apartment recycling, the amount of
funding should not exceed the current funding of the single family program
which is'20% (Hennepin County 80 %).
4) What other support should the City offer?
Recommendation: Develop and provide a promotional flyer for each apartment
resident. Inform managers and associations of options for recycling service.
5) How can the City keep track of recycling tonnage from apartments to ensure this
material is credited toward Edina's recycling goals?
Recommendation: Require that haulers report recycling tonnages as a condition
of licensing, effective January 1991.
Program Summary:
Part I - Add 230.units (buildings of 8 units or less) to present household pickup
program, all eligible for funding by County. Purchase 1,000 additional recycling
containers, County will fund part. Start service in August if possible.
Costs - August through December, 1990
Total County Edina
Pickup service ($1.90 /unit /month) $2,185 $1,748 $ 437
Containers '(1,000 @ $5.85) 5.850 1.150 4,700
$8,035 $2,898 $5,137
Part II - Recycling for buildings of more than 8 units. Adopt ordinance requiring
recycling programs in apartments /condominiums by January 1, 1991. Amend ordinance
to require source separation of recyclables by apartment /condominium residents.
Amend ordinance to require, as a condition of licensing, that haulers provide
recycling service to apartments /condominiums and report recycling tonnage to City.
Provide promotional flyer for residents and information on recycling services for
managers of apartments /condominiums.
Council.Action Requested
1) Approval of Part I of the program.
2) Approval to draft required ordinances to implement program.
3) Approval to prepare promotional flyer.
4) Decision on funding of apartment recycling program.
Member Rice asked if, at the informational meeting with apartment managers and
condominium owners, they had indicated that they wanted recycling services.
Coordinator Chandler said that was the impression given. One manager said if this
was made mandatory she did not want to be put in the position of enforcing the
ordinance if not all the residents of her building would want to participate.
I
Member Paulus commented that she was of the impression that garbage hauling rates
would go down for buildings that recycled and that would, in effect, be a type of
"subsidy ". Coordinator Chandler said that seemed to be true for the larger
buildings.
Mayor Richards then called for comments or questions from the public. Donald
Grupp, resident of The Lanterns, asked if all apartment and condominium units
would be required to recycle. Coordinator Chandler said that was the intent of
the recommendation of the Recycling Commission.
Ruth Saari, 3901 West 49th Street, said she lived in a building with 32 units and
was in favor of making recycling mandatory for apartments. She asked if each unit
would have a container and questioned if there would be adequate room to
accommodate them. Coordinator Chandler said that in a building of that size there
probably would be 3 or 4 large containers placed near the area where people take
their garbage. The residents would bring their recyclables from their apartments
and place the glass and cans in the larger containers to be hauled away. The type
of container would be left up to the building management working in conjunction
with the hauler. The building management or condominium association would be
required to set up the recycling system for each multi -unit building..
Mayor Richards asked if there were funds in the current recycling budget to cover
the City portion of the costs if Part I of the apartment recycling program is
approved. Coordinator Chandler said there were funds intended for a bar code
system for keeping track of participation but when the Recycling Commission
discussed the funding they suggested that those funds be used for the apartment
recycling program.
Member Smith made a motion to approve Part I of the apartment /condominium
recycling program as recommended by the Recycling Commission and moved adoption of
the following resolution:
RESOLUTIOM
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that it hereby
approves expansion of the City's existing recycling program to include an
additional 230 units comprised of apartment buildings of eight units or less, new
townhomes and manor homes, all of which are eligible for funding by Hennepin
County. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Resolution adopted.
The Council then discussed Part II of the apartment /condominium recycling program
and possible funding, if any, for apartment recycling. It was the consensus of
the Council Members that the City proceed with Part II of the program without
addressing the funding issue which would be debated as part of the 1991 budget
process.
Member Smith made a motion to approve Part II of the apartment /condominium
recycling program as recommended by the Recycling Commission as to drafting of
ordinances as required and preparation of a promotional flyer. Motion was
seconded by Member Rice.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
Lowell Swanson, 5501 Village Drive, suggested the Council take a hard look at the
issue of funding the apartment recycling program. He said it is possible that
these people are the ones who can least afford the fees for garbage and recycling
pickup.
MEMBER OF COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD REPLACED Mayor Richards advised that he
intended to appoint Cliff Sour to replace Bob Christianson as the Park Board
appointee to the Community Services Board.
Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith for consent of
the Mayor's appointment of Cliff Sour to the Community Services Board to fill the
unexpired term of Bob Christianson to 2/1/91.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED RELATING TO CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTION OF PLAT ERRORS Planner
Larsen informed the Council that in 1851 the territorial government of Minnesota
enacted legislation to permit filing of lots and blocks for building sites in the
form of subdivision plats. Since that time over 12,000 plats have been filed in
Hennepin County and errors and /or omissions have occurred in the platting of
subdivisions.. In the 1950's the legislature provided the surveyor a means to put
the public on notice that there was an error in a plat and to state the correct
data. Since then numerous Certificates of Correction have been filed. In 1976
the legislature provided that the municipality as well as a surveyor had to sign
the Certificate of Correction before the document could be accepted for filing..
By letter dated June 12, 1990, the Hennepin County Surveyor has offered to check
data on Certificates of Correction to assure that, in fact, the information is
correct. The review would be conducted before the Certificate is submitted to the
municipality. In order to provide this service, a resolution by the governing
body is requested.
Planner Larsen noted that Attorney Erickson has reviewed the statutes regarding
Certificates of Correction, has been advised by the County Surveyor's office that
no fee will be charged for this service, and that he would recommend adoption of
the resolution.
Member Rice introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, that it hereby requests
that the Hennepin County Surveyor's Office review and check for accuracy all data
on all Certificates of Correction submitted to the Edina City Council for
approval, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.176, and that each such
certificate be signed and approved as to accuracy by the Hennepin County
Surveyor's Office before being submitted to the Edina City Council for approval.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Smith.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Resolution adopted.
UPDATE GIVEN ON I -494 EIS PROCESS Member Paulus informed the Council that
Hennepin County is now back in the I -494 EIS process. Manager Rosland said that
includes total financial participation by the County also.
TRANSIT MEETING SCHEDULED FOR 7/11/90 Mayor Richards advised that Commissioner
Len Levine, MNDOT, is interested in examining the possibilities of demonstrating a
"high tech" people -mover in the Southdale /Edinborough transit corridor. A meeting
with the private sector and city officials to discuss the proposal has been
scheduled for Wednesday, July 11 at 9 a.m. at Southdale First Bank, 7001 France
Avenue South. Mayor Richards said he planned to attend and other Council Members
should if their schedules allowed.
E%ECUTIVE DIRECTOR APPOINTED FOR SHHSC Member Kelly advised that Carolyn Forbes
has been appointed as Executive Director of South Hennepin-Human Services Council
as of June 18, 1990.
UPDATE GIVEN ON DETO% CENTER Manager Rosland reported that he had attended a
meeting with representatives of Eden Prairie, Bloomington, Hopkins and Richfield
regarding the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners decision to not extend the
contract for the Fairview Receiving and Evaluation Center.- At that meeting he had
represented the Council's position that the County Board be asked to distribute
all available funds allocated to detox centers on a pro -rata basis. He said the
only action the other cities wanted to take was to ask the County Board to restore
all funding for the detox center in Eden Prairie.
AMENDMENT TO ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE TO BE DRAFTED AND HEARD ON 7/16/90 Manager
Rosland advised the Council Members that the Minnesota Supreme Court has denied
the request to hear the City's appeal of the recent Court of Appeals decision on
the animal control ordinance as it pertains to dog barking. He said an amendment
to the ordinance is being drafted by the prosecuting attorney in response to the
decision of the Court of Appeals with the intent to bring it to the Council on
July 16. Mayor Richards suggested that this be given priority so that the Council
can consider it on that date. Member Paulus commented that there should also be
citizen input and suggested that the Edina Sun - Current give this publicity.
Considerable discussion followed as to the cost for and feasibility of attempting
to legislate additional controls for owners of barking dogs. It was concluded
that the consensus of the Council was to consider the draft ordinance amendment
for First Reading on July 16.
*CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Smith to
approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register
dated 07/02/90 and consisting of 27 pages: General Fund $79,779.39, Communications
$569.34, Art Center $1,583.71, Swimming Pool Fund $2,332.73, Golf Course Fund
$57,641.67,,Recreation Center Fund $2,836.63, Gun Range Fund $693.00, Edinborough
Park $9,446.62, Utility Fund $241,322.81, Storm Sewer Utility $5,738.80, Liquor
Dispensary Fund $9,339.39, Construction Fund $24,642.11, Total $435,946.20.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the
meeting adjourned at 9:25 p.m.
City Clerk
/1.OA- Al-l`1'� '
Cn
�°
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
it 1888 �O
iBeB
To: Kenneth Rosland
Agenda Item #
III.
A.
From: Craig Larsen
Consent
0
Information Only
❑
Date: July 16, 1990
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject: S -90 -4, Lindell
0
To Council
Addition.
Action
0
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Continue hearing to August 20, 1990.
NFO /BACKGROUND
The above matter has been referred back to the Planning Commission. There
are no changes to the proposal since initial review by the Planning Commission.
However,.the notification sign was not in place as required.
A second review will fulfill the sign notification requirement and allow those
previously not notified by mail, but now informed.by the presence of the sign,
an opportunity to comment.
o e ��
p
,Sao
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Kenneth Rosland
From: Craig Larsen
Date: July 16, 1990
Subject: Comprehensive Plan
Amendment, Jupiter and
Beyond
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
II.
B.
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
❑
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Continuation of the hearing while awaiting comments from the Metropolitan
Council.
INFO /BACKGROUND
On May 8, 1990, the Park Board adopted the Plan and submitted it to the Planning
Commission and City Council for Public Hearing. The Planning Commission held a
public hearing on June 27, 1990, and voted unanimously to recommend approval of
the plan to the City Council.
A.
e` t4
ch
• �'�bRVOMj°'v •
1BBB
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
From: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER
Date: JULY 13, 1990
Subject: ORDINANCE NO. 312 -A2
TO DECLARE CERTAIN
ANIMAL NOISES TO BE A
PUBLIC NUISANCE
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
IV.A.1
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
First Reading of Ordinance No. 312 -A2.
Info /Ba ckground:
Attached is a proposed amendment (Ordinance No. 312 -A2) to the animal control
ordinance which has been drafted by the City's Prosecuting Attorney and been
reviewed by the City Attorney.
I have also included a copy of the letter dated July 6, 1990 from Marsh Halberg,
Prosecuting Attorney, which provides background information on the options the
Council may consider on the issue of barking dogs.
ORDINANCE NO. 312 -A2
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 312 TO DECLARE
CERTAIN ANIMAL NOISES TO BE
A PUBLIC NUISANCE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS;
Section 1. Section 29.(j) of Ordinance No. 312 is hereby amended to
read as follows:
"(j) No person owning, operating, having charge of, or
occupying, any building or premise shall keep or allow to be kept, any
animal which shall, by any noise, unreasonably disturb the peace and
quiet of any person in the vicinity.
The phrase "unreasonably disturb the peace and quiet" shall include,
but is not limited to, the creation of any noise by any animal which can
be heard by any person, including a law enforcement officer or animal
control officer, from a location outside of the building or premises
where the animal is being kept and which animal noise occurs
repeatedly over. at least a five - minute period of time with one minute
or less lapse of time between each animal noise during the five minute
period."
— . Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately
upon its passage and publication.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Published in the Edina Sun - Current on
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
350 PARK AVENUE
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022
(212)413 -9200
1330 CONNECTICUT AVENUE, N. W.
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20036
(202)837 -0700
3 ORACECHURCH STREET
LONDON EC3V OAT, ENGLAND
01- 929 -3334
36, RUE TRONCHET
75009 PARIS, PRANCE
01- 42- 66 -59 -49
FAR EAST FINANCE CENTER
HONG HOBO
852- 3-8612333
BY FACSIMILE
Ms. Marcella Daehn
City Clerk
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Marc:
DORSEY & WHITNEY
A Pes Ns XIP INCL=INO Pa "SSI —L CORM TIOM9
2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
(612) 340 -2600
TELEX 29 -0605
FAX (612) 340 -2868
THOMAS S. ERICKSON, P. A.
(612) 340 -2659
July 12,1990
Re: Dog Barking Ordinance
340 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 33903
(507)288 -3166
315 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 33391
(612)473-0373
1200 FIRST INTERSTATE CENTER
BILLINGS, MONTANA 39103
(406)252 -3800
201 DAVIDSON BUILDING
GREAT PALLS, MONTANA 59401
(406)727 -3632
127 EAST FRONT STREET
MISSOULA, MONTANA 59802
(406)721-6025
I enclose proposed Ordinance No. 312 -A2 relating to dog barking. This
is essentially the ordinance prepared by Marsh Halberg with some language changes
made by me which I discussed with Ken Rosland. Will you please send this out in
the Council packet. I presume there should be attached Marsh Halberg's letter of
July 6, to give the Council some background.
If you have any questions, please advise.
Very truly yours,
Thomas S. Erickson
TSE:kks
Enclosure
cc Marsh J. Halberg, Esq.
` THOMSEN
LAW OFFICES
' N YBFAX
O
SUITE 600, EmNBROUGH CORPORATE CENTER EAST
JOHNSON
3300 EDINBOROUGH WAY, MINNEAPOLIS (EDINA). MINNESOTA 55435
BOUQUET
V�NBURG
(612) 835 -7000 • FAX: (612) 835 -9450
VAN
OHNV
GLENN G. NYBECK MARSH J. HALBERG OF COUNSEL.
" &
S1VIl M R&
GORDON V. JOHNSON WILLIAM E. SJOHOLM JACK W. CARLSON
JOHN K. BOUQUET THOMAS R. KELLEY RICHARD D. WILSON, P.A.
JAMES VAN VALKENBURG DENNIS M. PATRICK HELGE THOMSEN. RETIRED
MARK G. OHNSTAD PHILIP SIEFF
DONALD D. SMITH DAVID J. MCGEE
July 6, 1990
Mr. Ken Rosland
Edina City Manager
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Re: Edina Dog Barking Ordinance
Dear Mr. Rosland:
In the past few months, the Edina ordinance governing barking
dogs was ruled unconstitutional by the Minnesota Court of
Appeals. The State Supreme Court refused to review the case and
as such the decision of the Court of Appeals stands.
The Edina ordinance in question states as follows:
"(j) No person owning, operating, having charge of, or
occupying any building or premises shall keep or allow to be
kept any animal which shall by any noise disturb the peace
and quiet of any persons in the vicinity thereof."
Because this ordinance will now need to be changed, I have been
investigating different options available to the City to deal
with this issue. I have contacted numerous local municipalities
to review their dog ordinances. All the cities have ordinances
which are very similar to our own and as such their ordinances
are also in question.
I have been working with Mr. Mitch Rothman, the Deputy City
Attorney for the City of Minneapolis, and Ms. Carla Heyl, Staff
Attorney at the League of Minnesota Cities, to review future
action. Based upon my research into this problem, I would
propose two different options to the council for enactment of a
new city ordinance.
Option One.
The first option is to merely take the existing ordinance and
modify the phrase that says "disturb the peace and quiet" to say
"unreasonably disturb the peace and quiet."
The advantage of this option is that it involves a minimal change
to the ordinance and it allows flexibility to address the unique
fact situation of each case for enforcement. As such, whether a
Mr. Ken Rosland
July 6, 1990
Page 2
dogs barking was so excessive as to be unreasonable will be
determined on a case by case basis by the court.
Although Minneapolis has not yet changed its ordinance, I an-
ticipate they will be changing their ordinance to follow this
option by including the word "unreasonable." The idea is that by
referring to the concept of reasonableness, the statute will be
sufficiently precise to withstand constitutional challenges that
it is too vague.
The other minor changes are to change the word "persons" to
"person" and drop the word "thereof" for clarity.
As such, the new ordinance would read:
"(j) No person owning; operating, having charge of, or
occupying any building or premises shall keep or allow to be
kept any animal which shall by any noise unreasonably
disturb the peace and quiet of any person in the vicinity."
Option Two.
The second option is to totally rewrite our ordinance to include
even greater specificity as to what may cause a violation of the
ordinance. As such, the ordinance could be drafted as follows:
"No person owning, operating, having charge of, or occupying
any building or premise shall keep or allow to be kept, any
animal which shall, by any noise, unreasonably disturb the
peace and quiet of any person in the vicinity.
The definition of "unreasonably disturb the peace and quiet"
shall include but is not limited to the existence of any
noise by said animal which can be heard by any person,
including a law enforcement officer or animal control
officer, from a position other than the building or premises
where the animal is located and the animal noise occurs re-
peatedly over a five - minute period of time with there being
no more than one minute lapse of time between each animal
noise during the five minute period."
The advantage of the second option is that it includes a very
definite definition of a certain fact situation where the
ordinance would be violated. As such, this option would add
further clarity to the statute.
One of the criticisms by the Court of Appeals is that the current
ordinance does not give enough notice to people as what would
Mr. Ken Rosland
July 6, 1990
Page 3
cause a violation. Option Two is drafted to say that if a dog
barks continually for five minutes, and it could be heard
anywhere off the premises, it would be a violation.
The disadvantage of this option is the enforcement problem
whereby someone will actually have to use their watch to time the
frequency of the dog barking. The statute is written, however,
to include but not limit itself to this five - minute rule so that
law enforcement will have some flexibility to enforce other
situations as well.
Regardless of which course of action the City Council wishes to
undertake, it is important for the City to have a uniform
precomplaint process for enforcement of these cases. For
example, in the City of Minneapolis, the City requires a very
extensive process to be followed prior to the prosecutor issuing
any criminal charges for barking dog violations. In Minneapolis,
upon the first violation a "courtesy warning letter" is sent to
the offending household. Upon a second complaint, the animal
control officer will visit the offending household and attempt to
speak to the responsible person of the household concerning the
problem. The animal control officer will then-leave a "warning
notice" with the responsible person or post such warning notice
on the door. Upon a third complaint about the same household,
the City requires adult neighbors from three separate households
to petition the City indicating their concern and their willing-
ness to testify in court on the City's behalf. After a completed
petition is signed by the adults from three households, it is
filed with the animal control officer and a formal warning
letter is sent by first class mail to the prospective defendant.
If after this third warning, the offending household fails to
comply with keeping the dog quiet, the file is then forwarded to
the City's Attorney's office so that criminal charges may be
filed regarding the fourth violation.
Although I believe the City of Minneapolis' precomplaint process
requires too many warnings before action is taken, this is a
policy decision for our Council. The Council may wish to have
one warning letter sent and /or one visit made by an animal
control officer prior to any charges being filed against an
offending household. In addition, the police department and I
will need direction whether the City Council wishes to require
complaining neighbors to identify themselves and indicate their
willingness to testify on behalf of the state before action is
taken.
One of the criticisms alluded to in the Court of Appeals'
decision was the lack of any private citizen being brought
Mr. Ken Rosland
July 6, 1990
Page 4
forward to testify in regard to the recent case. I do not
believe it is required that a private citizen be required to
testify to obtain a conviction, but the testimony of complaining
neighbors goes to the issue of what is an "unreasonable distur-
bance." (For example, the dog barking may be more unreasonable if
it is disturbing people who actually live in the neighborhood
versus an animal control officer who is in the area.)
The opposing argument to having citizens being named in the
complaint process is that it may cause retaliation problems by
the offending household against the complaining neighbors or
generate unnecessary hostilities within a neighborhood.
It is our recommendation that the Council adopt Option Two as the
new animal noise ordinance although the first one would also be
acceptable to us. In addition, I would ask for some direction
regarding how many warnings or contacts by the animal control
officer you wish to have made to the offending household prior to
criminal charges being issued. (The Dreher case .involved one
prior warning.) The police staff and I can then draft an
interoffice memorandum outlining the precomplaint process to be
followed by the police department.
Finally, as to the issue of citizen involvement in the complaint
process, I will defer to the Council as to what recommendation
they wish to make. Option Two includes language which would
allow enforcement of the violation solely upon complaints from a
law enforcement officer or animal control officer. That or-
dinance could be modified to substitute language which requires
the complaint be based upon the complaint of at least one named
citizen.
Very truly yours,
Marsh J. Ha berg
Prosecuting Attorney
City of Edina
MJH:mk
cc: James Van Valkenburg
Chief Craig Swanson
Agenda Item IV.A.1
Lane
-------'--
ee-
Al
Agenda Item IV.A.1
FMOM
� I =... m-M
^
�. CAME
r O It z/ A - r
4917 LantMa Lane
i
t
o e "'v
0
>1
fN IV
lose
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Ken Rosland
From: Janet Chandler
Date: July 16, 1990
Subject: Apartment Recycling
Ordinances
No. 715 -A1
No. 1301 -A5
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
I" :
A : 3
Consent
[j
,
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
0
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
0
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Approval of the attached ordinance amendments as requested in Council
discussion of July 2 and briefly described below.
At the July 2 meeting, Council also stated that the question of funding for
apartment recycling would be considered during the budget process.
Info /Background
Ordinance No. 715 -A1 requires that as of January 1, 1991:
- recycling programs shall be set up in all multi -unit housing
buildings, and
- residents of such buildings (except nursing homes) shall be required
to separate recyclables from other refuse, and
- apartment and condominium managers or associations shall report
recycling program information to the City.
Ordinance No. 1301 -A5 requires that, as of January 1, 1991, garbage haulers
-shall offer recycling service to their apartment and condominium
customers, and
-shall report to the City, on a quarterly basis, the tonnage of
recyclables collected from Edina apartments and condominiums.
ORDINANCE NO. 715-A1
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 715
TO PROVIDE FOR MANDATORY SEPARATION
AND STORAGE OF RECYCLABLES FROM PLANNED
RESIDENCE DISTRICTS AND MIXED
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS IN THE CITY
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Definitions. The following definitions of Sec. 2 of Ordinance
No. 715 are hereby amended to read as follows:
"Dwellings" means those dwellings described at (i)� a (ii) and
JM of the definition of Premises in this ordinance.
"Premises" means (i) all single family dwellings now or
hereafter located in the Single Dwelling,Unit District (R -1) as
determined by the Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance No. 825) of the City,
(ii) all double dwellings now or hereafter located in the Double
Dwelling Unit District (R -2) as determined by said Zoning Ordinance,
building in a Planned Residence District (PRD or PSR) or Mixed
Development District as determined by said Zoning; Ordinance except
however, those in a building in the PRD -5 subdistrict as determined by
said Zoning Ordinance, (iv) all buildings in a PRD -5 subdistrict as
determined by said Zoning Ordinance vj all buildings or parts of
buildings now or hereafter owned by or leased to the City and located
in the City, except, however, park shelter or park toilet buildings, and
4*)Lvil all buildings or parts of buildings now or hereafter owned by or
leased to the School District and located within the City.
Sec. 2. Seyaration and Storage o _ f Recyclables.
(a) Sec. 3(a) of Ordinance No. 715 is hereby amended to read as follows:
(a) Every resident of every premises except the premises
described at (iv) of the definition of Premises in this ordinance shall
separate the recyclables from their respective premises from all other
refuse, garbage, rubbish and waste matter as defined in Ordinance No.
711, and shall store the recyclables separately in containers designated
as containers for the storage of recyclables. As to the premises described
obligation and responsibility of the manager or owner of such
premises, and not of the individual occupants thereof to separate and
store recyclables as required by the immediately preceding sentence
(b) Sec. 3(b) of Ordinance No. 715 is hereby amended to read as follows:
(b) Containers for storage or recyclables shall be kept in the same
location as is designated by Ordinance No. 711 for refuse containers;
provided, however, that residents of those dwellings described at (i)
and (ii) of the definition of Premises in this ordinance and residents of
townhouses as defined in the Zoning Ordinance (No 825) of the City,
and residents of dwelling units in buildings with eight dwelling units
or less therein, not earlier than twelve (12) hours prior to the day for
scheduled collection of recyclables from their respective dwellings,
shall place the recyclables and the containers, for recyclables at a place
adjacent to the dwelling (or building in which the dwelling is located)
or garage accessory thereto and visible from the street in front of the
dwelling (or building in which the dwelling is located) or from the
alley by the dwelling (or building in which the dwelling is located) if
that dwelling (or building in which the dwelling is located) has refuse
collection service at the alley. After the scheduled collection, the
containers for recyclables and any recyclables not collected shall be
returned by the resident of such 4he dwelling to the same location as
containers for refuse are kept as designated by Ordinance No. 711.
Sec. 3. Collection of Recycl^ ables.
(a) Sec. 4(a) of Ordinance No. 715 is hereby amended to read as follows:
(a) Collection of recyclables from premises shall be by a hauler
selected and paid by a resident of such premises or by a manager of such
premises or by an association governing such premises but which
hauler is then duly licensed by the City under Ordinance No. 1301 of
the City and other then applicable ordinances of the City or County.
Also such collection shall be done in compliance with all other
applicable ordinances of the City now or hereafter in effect.
(b) Sec. 4 of Ordinance No. 715 is hereby amended to add a new
paragraph (d) as follows:
(d) The manager or governing association of premises as
defined at (iii) and (iv) of Sec. 2 of this ordinance shall report to the City
Manager, upon written request from time to time made by the City Manager, or his /her designee and on forms prescribed by the City
Manager, or his /her designee such information relative to the
2
yrogjam for separation, storage and collection of recyclables then in
effect for their premises as the Ci Manager, or his /her designee shall
then request.
Sec. 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
upon its. passage and publication, but not earlier that January 1, 1991.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Published in the Edina Sun - Current on
ATTEST:
City Clerk
3
Mayor
r
ORDINANCE NO. 1301 -A5
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1301
TO REQUIRE GARBAGE HAULERS AND RECYCLING
HAULERS TO OFFER RECYCLABLE COLLECTION SERVICE
AND TO PROVIDE RECYCLING REPORTS, AND
IMPOSING A PENALTY
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Ordinance No. 1301 is hereby amended by adding a new
Sec. 16 as follows:
Sec. 16. Recyclable Collection Service. All persons licensed
under this ordinance to haul, convey or collect rubbish, garbage or
other refuse, as defined in Ordinance No. 711 of the City, or recyclables
as defined ,in Ordinance No. 715 of the City, shall offer recyclable
collection service to their customers.
Sec. 2. Ordinance No. 1301 is hereby amended by adding a new Sec. 17
as follows:
Sec. 17. Rec} cling Reports. Within thirty (30) days after the end
of each calendar quarter, and also upon request made from time to
time by the City Manager, or his /her designee, each hauler licensed
under this ordinance, shall provide to the City such information as is
then requested by the City Manager, or his /her designee, on forms
prescribed by the City Manager, or his /her designee, relative to the
recyclables collected during the period from the then prior report to the
City, including the amounts and kinds of recyclables, the markets used
for sale of, and primary purchasers of, recyclables, and including such
other information relative to recyclables as may then be requested by
the City Manager, or his /her designee.
Sec. 3. Penal . Sec. 16 of Ordinance No. 1301 is hereby renumbered
Sec. 18 and amended to read as follows:
"Section 18. Penalty.
a. Any person violating this ordinance shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor and subject to a fine and penalty as set out
in Ordinance No. 175 of the City, as from time to time
amended.
b. In addition to the foregoing penalties, the license of any
person violating this ordinance may be suspended or
revoked as provided by Ordinance No. 141 of the City and
Sec. 8 of this ordinance."
Sec. 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
immediately upon its passage and publication, but not earlier than January 1, 1991.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Published in the Edina Sun - Current on
ATTEST:
City Clerk
2
Mayor
04 a
�. �° REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
l
\ba .
ase
To: Kenneth Rosland
From: Philip S. Dommer
Date: July 16, 1990
Subject: Joyce Anderson
7121 Glouchester Avenue
Home Occupation
Recommendation:
INFOIBACKGROUND
Agenda Item #
-L.—A.
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
7
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
0
Discussion
~The following provides background information on the Planning Department's
involvement with Dr. Joyce Anderson.
In late March 1990, a resident on Glouchester Drive near Dr. Anderson's home
registered a complaint regarding the use of Dr. Anderson's home as a business
office. The complainant alleged the following:
1. Dr. Anderson is a psychologist who regularly sees clients in her home.
2. Approximately 20 clients visit the home on a scheduled basis per week.
3. The clients park on the street.
Between late March and April 6, 1990, the Planning Staff observed the activity
at the property. After confirming the complaints Dr. Anderson was contacted by
telephone and advised she was in violation of Ordinance 825.7. Specifically Dr.
Anderson violates the following provisions of 825.7.D.
1.(e) parking demands not accommodated on site;
1.(f) more than 10 automobile trips weekly
2.(d) professional who typically conducts meetings in home
i
Since that time, Dr. Anderson has indicated that she intends to continue her
business in violation of the Ordinance. We have also received two additional
complaints regarding Dr.. Anderson's business activity.
Attached are letters which further illustrate the communication between Dr.
Anderson and our office. You'll note that Dr. Anderson maintains that a
handicap forces her to remain in violation. Our last letter to Dr. Anderson and
her attorney John Mooty, dated July 3, 1990, advise them of the potential to:
1. Appeal the staffs contention that she is indeed in violation;
2. Seek an Ordinance amendment which could specify a handicap related
exception.
To date neither Mr. Mooty nor Dr. Anderson have contacted me to pursue the
administrative remedies already in place and available to them.
D. Customary Home Occunations as an accessory Uwe.
1. Customary ho-+e occupations which are per- 9i tted as an
accessory use Dv this ordinance w all cdrpty vi:- .-_ following
conditions:
(a) only the residents of the dwelllirg _n.- are em.piovea
on the lot or within the dwelling unit;
(b) no exterior structural Modifications are made to
change the residential character and appearance of the lot or
any ouildings or structures on the lot;
L1 r1
j
' ^
(c) no loading or unloading or other outdoor activities.
except parking, shall occur;
NNv
W
J�
(d) no signs of any kind shall be used to icentify the use;
(e) all parking demands generated by the use shall be
accommodated within the accessory garage and the noral driveway
m
O
area and shall not at any one time occupy more than two parking
spaces in parking areas required for multiple residential
buildings;
individuals no more than ten automobile trips weekly by
other than the residents of the dwelling unit shall
be generated to the dwelling unit as a result of the use; and
LU
(g) no sale of products or merchandise shall occur on the
lot.or within any structures or buildings on the lot.
U2.
z
U(a)
Permitted customary home occupations include. but are not
limited to. the following occupations if. and only during such times
as, they comely with all of the acove conditions:
dressmakers. tailors and seamstresses;
Z
_
O
(b) in single dwelling unit and double dwelling unit
buildings only. music and dance teachers providing instruction
to not more tnan five individuals at a time;
QW
Z
(c) artists. sculptors and authors;
O
O
F-
2
O(e)
(d) insurance agents. brokers. architects and similar
professionals wno typically conduct client meetings outside of
the dwelling unit;
ministers. rabbis and priests;
r �
U
) ' f
time; (f) photographers providing service to one customer at a
_
z
O
U)
`
/}�
�
(g) salespersons. provided that no stock in trade is
maintained on the lot or in the building or structure on the
lot; and
(h) in single dwelling unit and double dwelling unit
buildings only, rental of rooms for residential occupancy to not
more than two persons per dwelling unit in addition to the
permanent residents of the dwelling unit.
Nintensity
O
The -following uses have a tendency to increase in size or
beyond the conditions imposed by this ordinance for home
occupations and thereby adversely affect residential properties.
Therefore.. the following shall specifically not be permitted as
customary name occupations:
Z1�
/�
�,J J�
(a) barber shoos and beauty parlors;
Q
(b) repair services of all kinds. including. without
limitation. auto repair and painting, appliance repair and small
engine repair;
LU
U
(c) music. dance or exercise instruction which provides
instruction to groups of more than five individuals at a time;
(d) medical and dental offices;
(e) upholstering;
(f) mortuaries;
(g) kennels;
(h) tourist homes. boarding houses or rooming houses. and
other kinds of transient occupancies;
(i) commercial food preparation or catering; and
(j) automobile and equipment sales.
JOYCE G. ANDERSON, PH.D.
Licensed Consulting Psychologist
7121 Glouchester Avenue
Edina, Minnesota 55435
April 13, 1990
Mr. Phil Dommer
City of Edina Senior Planner
City Hall
Edina, Minnesota
Mr. Dommer:
It was with great surprise and shock that I received your telephone call last Friday afternoon. Your
warning me that I may be found in violation of an Edina City Ordinance by counseling as a
psychologist in my dome, caused me great distress (1) because I was not aware that I could be
violating the law, as many psychologists in the twin cities and suburbs office in their homes, and
(2) because you were in essence telling me that I must move from my home and from my
community because I have a physical disability and must work out of my home.
I am physically unable to office outside of roy home dub to a mobility impairment which is further
complicated by long -term residuals from a neck injury. My walking is very rationed, often
painful; thus I try to respect the limits of my body in order to balance my living and participate as
an active member of my community, despite being physically limited. Although I have these
physical limitations, I have worked very hard educationally and professionally to achieve the
ability to independently practice my profession. I specialize in working with persons having
physical illness and /or disability which is especially appropriate as my background was nursing,
and I am also a registered nurse. This largely accounts for my association with a Medical Clinic and
my time -share relationship there for one to two hours per week. My home office is very accessible
with only two steps into my home; however it is not accessible to wheelchairs, so that any persons
confined to wheelchairs must be seen at the clinic.
As to the ordinance *825, Section 7, pertaining to customary home occupations: rather than your
assessment of my work as a psychologist being comparable to that of a medical or dental office,
insurance agent, broker, or architect; I see my profession more closely associated with that of a
minister, rabbi, or preist, as people come to me and sit for one hour to discuss and work toward
resolution of their personal problems in living. No medication is ever prescribed by psychologists,
and my work setting cannot be compared with any type of medical or dental clinic which are
laboratory situations dealing with body fluids, etc. and thus represent Public Health Concerns.
I am requesting a waver from the city to continue to practice at home as it is a medical necessity for
me. I have averaged approximately 15 to 16 client hours per week the past 1 and 1/2 years since
January 1989. Previous to that. I was averaging only 10 client hours per week as I was a student
completing my doctorate. Twenty hours per week is and will continue to be my intended maximum,
as my work involves many hours which are not involving client contact. I have had 21 client hours
only once.
Joyce 0. Anderson, Page 2 April 13, 1990
Upon your request, this past week I have spaced 15 to 30 minutes between clients, so there cannot
possibly be any excess of traffic. This is easily done, and could have been accomplished earlier;
however, I had no indication that. my practice was problematic for my neighbors. I would like to
invite you and any members of the city council to visit my home so that you can observe the
internal and external setting; and hopefully better understand my situation. In actuality, several of
my neighbors have two to three vehicles within their families, and I believe that their driveways
are much more traveled than mine, as I live alone and drive one vehicle.
As to the specific complaints you have received about people going to the wrong houses, leaving
their cars and walking up and down the street, I must say that what you have heard is either untrue
or is a gross exageration; and other neighbors near my home have strongly stated that they believe
this to be untrue also. As I told you Monday by phone, one client last year approached the wrong
house. Mr. Mayo Brandjord, at 7112 Glouchester Avenue, is one such neighbor who believes the
reported complaints to be without reasonable cause; and he has indicated to me that he would be
happy to talk with you. His telephone number is 925 -2690.
I hope you will give serious consideration to this matter, recognizing my needs and contributions to
the community. Your closing my home practice would necessitate the sale of my home and a move to
another part of the cities. This would be extremely stressful, costly, and difficult for me - not only
physically, but because I have gone to great effort to adapt my home to my health needs and that
transition has been quite successful and not easily achieved.
I have come to love my home here, my church; and to consider Edina my home and a community in
which I take alot of pride. I hope I don't have to leave Edina because I have a physical disability. I
am enclosing a current item from my church newsletter expressing that the public policy in Edina,
as well as surrounding communities, is to encourage disabled people to continue active participation
in their work and community, and to see that it is possible for them to do so.
I expect to receive and will be furnishing you with a letter from my physician, Dr. F:H. Sim, at the
Mayo Clinic, which will confirm the extent of my impairment, and explain that my disability is
such that it necessitates my practicing in my home. I will forward the letter to you when I receive
it.
I await your response. My attorney is Mr. John Mooty, an Edina resident, and 1, would like you to
communicate with him if appropriate. His office telephone number is 343 -2863.
Respectfully yours,
Joyce G. Anderson
'rtv-G t
E®INA
= D :.NM. MINNESC7. -_-
May 11, 1990
Mr. John Mooty
Gray, Plant, Mooty & Mooty
33 South 6th Street
3400 Multifoods Tower
Minneapolis, MN
55402
Re: Joyce Anderson
7121 Glouchester, Edina
Dear Mr. Mooty:
It is my understanding that Ms. Anderson is your client. With her permission
and at her suggestion I am writing you.
As you may be aware, the City of Edina has received complaints on three
occasions regarding business activity at Ms. Anderson's home on Glouchester.
The complaints specify that Ms. Anderson is seeing as many as twenty clients per
week in her home. Her business clients come and go by car and often wait in
their automobiles on the residential street. The complaints further state that
the business activity is on a regular and persistent basis.
After receiving the complaints we have verified the activity. I personally have
spoken with Ms. Anderson who is very forward about her business activity. Her
description is consistent with the report from our investigation. Ms. Anderson
also states in her letter dated April 13, 1990.
"I have averaged approximately 15 to 16 client hours per week the past 1 and 1/2
years since January 1989...... Twenty hours per week is and will continue to be
my intended maximum..."
As you know the City of Edina takes great care to preserve the quality
residential character of our neighborhoods. to, that end ordinances are in place
to regulate business activity in residential areas. A copy of the ordinance
applicable in this instance is enclosed.
I recognize that this is a difficult situation because of Ms. Anderson's
personal circumstances. There is no doubt, however, that Ms. Anderson is and
intends to continue activity in violation of,Ordinance 825.7. As evidenced by
complaints, the neighbors are not being protected from activity the ordinance is
designed to regulate. We therefore must require that Ms. Anderson comply with
Ordinance 825.7
My hope is that with your help we can bring a conclusion to this non - conforming
activity. We are not threatening legal action at this time, however, will
proceed as necessary to preserve the fine residential character of our
community. Please advise your client and I of your analysis and if possible
help Ms. Anderson find solutions to this problem.
Please contact me if I can answer any questions.
Sincerely,
Philip S. Dommer
Senior Planner
cc: Joyce Anderson
HAROLD G. CANT (1887.1973)
HENRY W. HAVERSTOCK (1694.1877)
FRANKLIN D. GRAY
FRANK W. PLANT, JR.
JOHN W. MDOTY
MELVIN R. MOOTY
SHEFFIELD WEST
RUSSELL M. BENNETT
CLINTON A. SCHROEDER
EDWARD J. CALLAHAN. JR.
JAMES S. SIMONSON
RICHARD N. FLINT
CURTIS D. FORSLUND
MACLAY R. HYDE
BRUCE D. GRUBBING
C. STEVEN WILSON
JOHN S. CROUCH
DAVID T. BENNETT
EDWIN C. CARPENTER
LINDLEY S. BRANSON
JOHN W. THIEL
ALBERT ANDREWS, JR.
NOEL P. MULLER
FRANKLIN C. JESSE, JR.
DAVID L. WHITE
GRAY, PLANT, MOOTY, MOOTY & BENNETT, P.A.
BRUCE . KIERNAT
DANIEL R. SHULMAN
MICHAEL R. CUNNINGHAM
ROBERT P. LARSON
RICHARD A. MOORE, JR.
BRUCE KRUGER
WILLIAM L. KILLION
ELIZABETH W. NORTON
JOHN E. BROW ER
PAMELA N. MERKLE
THOMAS DARLING
JOHN M. NICHOLS
MARTHA A. VAN DE VEN
MARY BETH BRODY
EDWIN R. HOLMES
DAVID N. MOOTY
RICHARD A. HACKETT
WILLIAM D. KLEIN
SUSAN L. SEGAL
JOHN L. KRENN
STEPHEN R. EIDE
JOHN D. GIUDICESSI. JR,
KATHLEEN S. TILLOTSON
Mr. Philip S. Dommer
Senior Planner
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
LAW OFFICES
3400 CITY CENTER
THIRTY THREE SOUTH SIXTH STREET
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
TELEPHONE 612.343 -2800
TELECOPIER 612.333 -0066
TWX 910 -576 -2778
DIRECT DIAL 343 -2863
June 8, 1990
Re: Joyce Anderson
7121 Glouchester, Edina
Dear Mr. Dommer :
MICHAEL C. FLOM
DAVID C. BAHLS
PHILLIP BOHL
JAMES F. CARROLL
ROBERT E. HARDING
LAURA J. HEIN
MYRON L. FRANS
KENNETH J. ELCHERT
ERIK T. SALVESON
RICHARD G. BRAMAN
PENNY M. TIBKE
NANCY A. OUATTLEBAUM
WILLIAM J. FISHER
VIRGINIA S. SCHUBERT
GEORGE R. WOOD
TAMARA HJELLE OLSEN
JEFFREY D. FICK
LYNN B. NOLAND
NANCY ROETMAN MENZEL
OUENTIN R. WITTROCK
ROBERT J. McREAVY
JAMES Y. PRICHARD
GREGORY R. MERZ
P. DIANE FEILER
BRIAN B. SCHNELL
WADE T. ANDERSON
ARTHUR W. DICKINSON
LAURA J. SCHOENBAUER
VALERIE BOLES WAGONER
RICK E. KUBLER
TIMOTHY M. BURKE
BARBARA E. TRETHEWAY
TROY A. BAD ER
NANCY J. MILLER
STACY A. LEVIN
OF COUNSEL
ROBERT L. HELLAND
D. JAMES NIELSEN
DANIEL B. VENTRES. JR.
ROBERT A. STEIN
DAVID M. COYNE
BETSY B. BAKER
Thank you for your letter of May 11 with reference to the
above matter.
As you note in your letter, it is a difficult situation
because of Dr. Anderson's personal circumstances. On the other
hand, it is important that the City of Edina preserve the
quality of the residential character of its neighborhoods.
We are living in an era where all branches of government
including city government, state government and federal
government are making concerted efforts to be helpful to
handicapped persons, with special parking permits, extensive
building code requirements, retraining benefits, anti-
discrimination provisions and a multitude of other similar types
of legislation to recognize the importance of trying to assist
those citizens in overcoming their disabilities and permitting
them to lead useful and beneficial lives and be less dependent
upon their communities in general.
Mr. Philip S. Dommer
June 8, 1990
Page 2
I know that Edina as one of the most progressive
communities totally shares this concern.
,In reviewing the ordinance it would appear that the type of
work Dr. Anderson does is not specifically listed in either
paragraph 2 or 3. Paragraph 2 specifically states that it is
not all inclusive and that there are other occupations that
could fall within that paragraph. As Dr. Anderson does not
employ the extensive equipment and auxillary personnel that are
normally incident to a medical or dental practice, I do not
believe that it would be appropriate to consider her activity as
falling within that category. In the sense that it is purely
consultation, it would appear to be more close in its nature to
the services that would be provided by ministers, rabbis or
priests.
With reference to the provisions of paragraph 1, I would
believe that the only provision that Dr. Anderson is not clearly
in compliance with would be paragraph 1(f). If this provision
is intended to mean that no more than 10 individuals may visit
the premises in a single week, as distinguished from the fact
that no individual may visit the premises more than 10 times
unless that individual is a resident, then Dr. Anderson would
not be in compliance. However, the more restrictive
interpretation would not seem to be consistent with the fact
that paragraph 2(b) would permit music and dance teachers to
have up to five individuals present at the same time. This
would undoubtedly result in a total that would exceed 10 during
a weekly period.
Because of the fact that Dr. Anderson schedules her clients
for specific periods with intervals in between, she does not
exceed two parking spaces at any time. It would be possible for
her to provide that all of her clients park in her driveway with
the result that no street parking would be utilized.
While I understand that an overwhelming majority of the
people in her area have no objection to her present practice, I
am wondering if it would be possible to resolve the matter by
having it understood that the clients would not park in the
street. If this is not satisfactory, it would seem to me that
this matter should perhaps be presented to the Council to
determine whether the Council would be prepared to consider any
sort of a disability exception. Certainly, a tightly drawn
handicap exception would be all that would be required in order
to protect the area and at the same time not force Dr. Anderson
to move to another location outside of Edina in order to
continue her practice.
Mr. Philip S. Dommer
June 8, 1990
Page 3
I apologize for the delay in responding to your letter but
I have been out of the office a good deal since it was received.
Sincerely,
Joh m W W. Mooty
JWM:lmr
0451Y
July 3, 1990
John W. Mooty
Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett, P.A.
3400 City Center
33 S. 6th Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
RE: Dr. Joyce Anderson
7121 Glouchester, Edina
Dear Mr. Mooty:
Thank you for your letter dated June 8, 1990. Ironically, that
same day a couple come into City Hall to personally register a
complaint regarding Dr. Anderson's illegal business activity.
Obviously, Dr. Anderson's activity is disruptive to the
neighborhood. We must and do order that the activity cease since
it does not comply with the Edina Ordinances as specified below:
1. Non - conforming use. Dr. Anderson's licensed psychological
practice is, in our opinion, classified similar to a medical or
dental office and is specifically prohibited by the ordinance. I
recognize you disagree with this interpretation.
At best, however, Dr. Anderson might be considered a professional
who, as your letter states, provides "consultation ". Such
professionals, including, but not limited to, insurance agents
and brokers are permitted by the Ordinance provided they
"typically conduct client meetings outside of the dwelling
unit ". Since Dr. Anderson typically meets with clients in the
home her use is not permitted.
Finally, Dr. Anderson is not a minister, rabbi or priest. She
has previously told me she is not ordained and does not hold
credentials qualifying her in that category.
2. Parking demands at the site are not within the driveway in
violation of the Ordinance.
3. Weekly, automobile trips generated by the use by individuals
other than the resident exceed ten.
Dr. Anderson schedules between 15 and 20 clients per week at the
home. All, to my knowledge, arrive and depart by automobile
resulting in between 15 and 20 automobile trips per week.
Regarding the comparison to music and dance instruction to five
or fewer pupils at a time, such uses must also comply with the
automobile trip limit. Some instructors, however, are able
within the Ordinance to teach up to five students at a time more
than once a week because their uses are often neighborhood
specific. Students often walk or bicycle to the home from within
the neighborhood eliminating automobile trips.
We have come to our conclusion reluctantly after a thorough, fair
and consistent application of the Ordinance. Our hope is that
Dr. Anderson will be able to comply fully with the Ordinance by
July 19, 1990.
If you object to our interpretation you may appeal this
administrative decision to the Board of Appeals or seek an
Ordinance ammendment. Please contact me if you desire to discuss
this further.
Sincerely,
Philip S. Dommer
Senior Planner
cc:- Dr. Anderson
Agenda Item V.A
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK
SUBJECT: CONCERN OF RESIDENT - JOYCE G. ANDERSON
DATE: JULY 13, 1990
The attached data was submitted by Dr. Joyce G. Anderson with the request
that it be included in the Council packets for the meeting of July 16, 1990.
JOYCE 0. ANDERSON, PH.D.
Licensed Consulting Psychologist
7121 8louchester Avenue
Edina, Minnesota 55435
April 13, 1990
Mr. Phil Dommer
City of Edina Senior Planner
City Hall
Edina, Minnesota
Mr. Dommer:
It was with great surprise and shock that I received your telephone call last Friday afternoon. Your
warning me that I may be found in violation of an Edina City Ordinance by counseling as a
Psychologist in my home, caused me great distress (1) because I was not aware that I could be
violating the law, as many psychologists in the twin cities and suburbs office in their homes, and
(2) because you were in essence telling me that I must move from my home and from my
community because I have a physical disability and must work out of my home.
I am physically unable to office outside of my home due to a mobility impairment which is further
complicated by long -term residuals from a neck injury. My walking is very rationed, often
painful; thus I try to respect the limits of my body in order to balance my living and participate as
an active member of my community, despite being physically limited. Although I have these
physical limitations, I have worked very hard educationally and professionally to achieve the
ability to independently practice my profession. I specialize in working with persons having
physical illness and /or disability which is especially appropriate as my background was nursing,
and I am also a registered nurse. This largely accounts for my association with a Medical Clinic and
my time -share relationship there for one to two hours per week. My home office is very accessible
with only two steps into my home; however it is not accessible to wheelchairs, so that any persons
confined to wheelchairs must be seen at the clinic.
As to the ordinance 0825, Section 7, pertaining to customary home occupations: rather than your
assessment of my work as a psychologist being comparable to that of a medical or dental office,
insurance agent, broker, or architect; I see my profession more closely associated with that of a
minister, rabbi, or preist, as people come to me and sit for one hour to discuss and work toward
resolution of their personal problems in living. No medication is ever prescribed by psychologists,
and my work setting cannot be compared with any type of medical or dental clinic which are
laboratory situations dealing with body fluids, etc. and thus represent Public Health Concerns.
I am requesting a waver from the city to continue to practice at home as it is a medical necessity for
me. I have averaged approximately 15 to 16 client hours per week the past 1 and 1/2 years since
January 1989. Previous to that, I was averaging only 10 client hours per week as I was a student
completing my doctorate or fulfilling licensure requirements. Twenty hours per week is and will
continue to be my intended maximum, as my work involves many hours which are not involving
client contact. I have had 21 client hours only once.
Joyce G. Anderson, Page 2' April 13, 1990
Upon your request, this past week I have spaced 15 to 30 minutes between clients, so there cannot
possibly be any excess of traffic. This is easily done, and could have been accomplished earlier;
however, I had no indication that my practice was problematic for my neighbors. I would like to
invite you and any members of the city council to visit my home so that you can observe the
internal and external setting; and hopefully better understand my situation. In actuality, several of
my neighbors have two to three vehicles within their families, and I believe that their driveways
are much more traveled than mine, as I live alone and drive one vehicle.
As to the specific complaints you have received about people going to the wrong houses, leaving
their cars and walking up and down the street, I must say that what you have heard is either untrue
or is a gross exageration, and other neighbors near my home have strongly stated that they believe
this to be untrue also. As I told you Monday by phone, one client last year approached the wrong
house. Mr. Mayo Brandjord, at 7112 Glouchester Avenue, is one such neighbor who believes the
reported complaints to be without reasonable cause; and he has indicated to me that he would be
happy to talk with you. His telephone number is 925 -2690.
I hope you will give serious consideration to this matter, recognizing my needs and contributions to
the community. Your closing my home practice would necessitate the sale of my home and a move to
another part of the cities. This would be extremely stressful, costly, and difficult for me - not only
physically, but because I have gone to great effort to adapt my home to my health needs and that
transition has been quite successful and not easily achieved.
I have come to love my home here, my church; and to consider Edina my home and a community in
which I take alot of pride. I hope I don't have to leave Edina because I have a physical disability. I
am enclosing a current item from my church newsletter expressing that the public policy in Edina,
as well as surrounding communities, is to encourage disabled people to continue active participation
In their work and community, and to see that it is possible for them to do so.
I expect to receive and will be furnishing you with a letter from my physician, Dr. F.H. Sim, at the
Mayo Clinic, which will confirm the extent of my impairment, and explain that my disability is
such that it necessitates my practicing in my home. I will forward the letter to you when I receive
it.
I await your response. My attorney is Mr. John Mooty, an Edina resident, and I would like you to
communicate with him if appropriate. His office telephone number is 343 -2863.
Respectfully yours,
Joyce G. Anderson
Mayo Clinic
Franklin H. Sim, M.D.
Orthopedic Surgery
Adult Reconstruction
Joyce ANDERSON
To Whom It May Concern:
Rochester, Minnesota 55905 Telephone 507 284 -2511
April 20, 1990
Mrs. Joyce Anderson has been under our care at the Mayo Clinic because
of severe degenerative arthritis of her left knee. She had a prior
patellectomy.
On April 30, 1985 we proceeded with a left total knee arthroplasty.
While she has done reasonably well following her total knee arthroplasty,
she has had to adjust her lifestyle to accommodate for her persistent
disability and continues to have a chronic problem with her left leg. She
cannot walk distances and hard surface walking is especially problematic.
Therefore, it was recommended that she practice in her home so that
walking is minimized and her independent physical functioning be maintained
as much as possible. Her home has been adapted to accommodate her physical
needs. I feel that this is a medical necessity.
Sincerely yours,
i✓
Franklin H. Sim, M.D.
Professor of Orthopedic Surgery
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
FHS:rlh
Dictated but not read
to expedite mailing.
dibINA
May 11, 1990
Mr. John Mooty
Gray, Plant, Mooty & Mooty
33 South 6th Street
2400 Xultifoods T:.;,;er
Minneapolis, MN
55402
Re: Joyce Anderson
7121 Glouchester, Edina
Dear Mr. Mooty:
It is my understanding that Ms. Anderson is your client. With her permission
and at her suggestion I am writing you.
As you may be aware, the City of Edina has received complaints on three
occasions regarding business activity at Ms. Anderson's home on Glouchester.
The complaints specify that Ms. Anderson is seeing as many as twenty clients per
week in her home. Her business clients come and go by car and often wait in
their automobiles on the residential street. The complaints further state that
the business activity is on a regular and persistent basis.
After receiving the complaints we have verified the activity. I personally have
spoken with Ms. Anderson who is very forward about her business activity. Her
description is consistent with the report from our investigation. Ms. Anderson
also states in her letter dated April 13, 1990.
"I have averaged approximately 15 to 16 client hours per week the past 1 and 1/2
years since January 1989...... Twenty hours per week is and will continue to be
my intended maximum..."
As you know the City of Edina takes great care to preserve the quality
residential character of our neighborhoods. To that end ordinances are in place
to regulate business activity in residential areas. A copy of the ordinance
applicable in this instance is enclosed.
I recognize that this is a difficult situation because of Ms. Anderson's
personal circumstances. There is no doubt, however, that Ms. Anderson is and
intends to continue activity in violation of Ordinance 825.7. As evidenced by
complaints, the neighbors are not being protected from activity the ordinance is
designed to regulate. We therefore must require that Ms. Anderson comply with
Ordinance 825.7
My hope is that with your help we can bring a conclusion to this non - conforming
activity. We are not threatening legal action at this time, however, will
proceed as necessary to preserve the fine residential character of our
community. Please advise your client and I of your analysis and if possible
help Ms. Anderson find solutions to this problem.
Please contact me if I can answer any questions
Sincerely,
Philip. S. Dommer
Senior Planner
cc: Joyce Anderson
7117 Cloucheszer five.
Edina, 14N 55435
May 20, 1590
Mr. Phillip S. bommer
Senior Planner
City --,f Edna
4001 -es t * 4n vt.
cdir ;a, i i:J 5544
scar itir. u�,!ur:�r:
leve understand there has Deen concern arrong some regarding our next
dour neighbor, i r. Joyce Anderson, and'her activities. It is
obvious .-hat her handicap, needing the assistance of cane and
som;etimies reeding two canes, deters her from a norma`.ly active
existence upon which her livelihood depends; this being even more
apparent curing the harsh winter months. The activity taking place
in her c�!rtainiy ao,-s not cause any problem for anyone.
There is no more traffic to her driveway than there is to anyone
else's driveway in the block. In fact, some residents have cun-
siderably ;iure coming- and -going traffic than Dr. Anderson has.
Her home -ind her property are maintained in a well - manicured fashion
Cor she employs the required maintenance people. in no way
i1oes she detract from the neighborhood.
t;c f i r!d br. 'diderson to oe a very desirable, cuiet, no- nonsense
fj�liy !bor, ano ;pa- Mould Lie disappointed if she chose to leave.
Sincerely,
Robert S. Kravi4
N
Alice . ravig
HAROLD G. CANT (1887.1973)
MENRY W. HAVER STOCK 11894.1977)
FRANKLIN D. GRAY
FRANK W. PLANT. JR.
JOHN W. MOOTY
MELVIN R. MOOTY
SHEFFIELD WEST
RUSSELL M. BENNETT
C LINTON A. SCHROEDER
EDWARD J. CALLAHAN. JR.
JAMES S. SIMONSON
RICHARD N. FLINT
CURTIS D. FORSLU NO
MACLAY R. HYDE
BRUCE D. GRUSSING
C. STEVEN WILSON
J ON S. CROUCH
DAVID T. BENNETT
EDWIN C. CARPENTER
LINDLEY S. BRANSON
JOHN W. THIEL
ALBERT ANDREWS. JR.
NOEL P. MULLER
FRANKLIN C. JESSE. JR.
DAVID L. WHITE
Copy to Joyce Anderson
GRAY, PLANT, MOOTY, MOOTY & BENNETT, P.A.
BRUCE E. KIERNAT
DANIEL R. SNULMAN
MICHAEL R. CUNNINGHAM
ROBERT P. LARSON
RICHARD A. MOORE. JR.
BRUCE KRUGER
WILLIAM L. KILLION
ELIZABETH W. NORTON
JOHN E. GROWER
PAMELA N. MERKLE
THOMAS DARLING
JOHN M. NICHOLS
MARTHA A. VAN DE VEN
MARY BETH BRODY
EDWIN R. HOLMES
DAVID N. MOOTY
RICHARD A. HACKETT
WILLIAM D. KLEIN
SUSAN L. SEGAL
JOHN L. KRENN
STEPHEN R. SIDE
JOHN D. GIUDICESSI. JR.
KATHLEEN S. TILLOTSON
Mr. Philip S. Dommer
Senior Planner
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
LAW OFFICES
3400 CITY CENTER
THIRTY THREE SOUTH SIXTH STREET
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
TELEPHONE 612.343.2800
TELECOPIER 612.333.0066
TWX 910 -576 -2778
DIRECT DIAL 343 -2863
June 8, 1990
Re: Joyce Anderson
7121 Glouchester, Edina
Dear Mr. Dommer:
MICHAEL C. FLOM
DAVID C. BAMLS
PHILLIP KOHL
JAMES F. CARROLL
ROBERT E. HARDING
LAURA J. HEIN
MYRON L. FRANS
KENNETH J. ELCHERT
ERIK T. SALVESON
RICHARD G. BRAMAN
PENNY M. TIBKE
NANCY A. QUATTLEBAUM
WILLIAM J. FISHER
VIRGINIA S. SCHUBERT
GEORGE R. WOOD
TAMARA NJELLE OLSEN
JEFFREY D. FICK
LYNN B. NOLAND
NANCY ROETMAN MENZEL
QUENTIN R. WITTROCK
ROBERT J. MCREAVY
JAMES Y. PRICHARD
GREGORY R. MERZ
P. DIANE FEILER
BRIAN B. SCHNELL
WADE T. ANDERSON
ARTHUR W. DICKINSON
LAURAJ.SCHOENSAUER
VALERIE BOLES WAGONER
RICK E. KUOLER
TIMOTHY M. BURKE
BARBARA E. TRETHEWAY
TROY A. BADER
NANCY J. MILLER
STACY A. LEVIN
OF COUNSEL
ROBERT L. HELLAND
D. JAMES NIELSEN
DANIEL B. VENTRES. JR.
ROBERT A. STEIN
DAVID M. COYNE
BETSY B. BAKER
Thank you for your letter of May 11 with reference to the
above matter.
As you note in your letter, it is a difficult situation
because of Dr. Anderson's personal circumstances. On the other
hand, it is important that the City of Edina preserve the
quality of the residential character of its neighborhoods.
We are living in an era where all branches of government
including city government, state government and federal
government are making concerted efforts to be helpful to
handicapped persons, with special parking permits, extensive
building code requirements, retraining benefits, anti-
discrimination provisions and a multitude of other similar types
of legislation to recognize the importance of trying to assist
those citizens in overcoming their disabilities and permitting
them to lead useful and beneficial lives and be less dependent
upon their communities in general.
Mr. Philip S. Dommer
June 8, 1990
Page 2
I know that Edina as one of the most progressive
communities totally shares this concern.
In reviewing the ordinance it would appear that the type of
work Dr. Anderson does is not specifically listed in either
paragraph 2 or 3. Paragraph 2 specifically states that it is
not all inclusive and that there are other occupations that
could fall within that paragraph. As Dr. Anderson does not
employ the extensive equipment and auxillary personnel that are
normally incident to a medical or dental practice, I do not
believe that it would be appropriate to consider her activity as
falling within that category. In the sense that it is purely
consultation, it would appear to be more close in its nature to
the services that would be provided by ministers, rabbis or
priests.
With reference to the provisions of paragraph 1, I would
believe that the only provision that Dr. Anderson is not clearly
in compliance with would be paragraph 1(f). If this provision
is intended to mean that no more than 10 individuals may visit
the premises in a single week, as distinguished from the fact
that no individual may visit the premises more than 10 times
unless that individual is a resident, then Dr. Anderson would
not be in compliance. However, the more restrictive
interpretation would not seem to be consistent with the fact
that paragraph 2(b) would permit music and dance teachers to
have up to five individuals present at the same time. This
would undoubtedly result in a total that would exceed 10 during
a weekly period.
Because of the fact that Dr. Anderson schedules her clients
for specific periods with intervals in between, she does not
exceed two parking spaces at any time. It would be possible for
her to provide that all of her clients park in her driveway with
the result that no street parking would be utilized.
While I understand that an overwhelming majority of the
people in her area have no objection to her present practice, I
am wondering if it would be possible to resolve the matter by
having it understood that the clients would not park in the
street. If this is not satisfactory, it would seem to me that
this matter should perhaps be presented to the Council to
determine whether the Council would be prepared to consider any
sort of a disability exception. Certainly, a tightly drawn
handicap exception would be all that would be required in order
to protect the area and at the same time not force Dr. Anderson
to move to another location outside of Edina in order to
continue her practice.
Mr. Philip S. Dommer
June 8, 1990
Page 3
I apologize for the delay in responding to your letter but
I have been out of the office a good deal since it was received.
Sincerely,
Joh W.
JWM:lmr
0451Y
am_
EDINA
July 3, 1990
John W. Mooty
Gray, Plant, Mooty,
3400 City Center
33 S. 6t6 Street
Mootv & Bennett, P.A.
Minneapolis, MN 55402
RE: Dr. Joyce Anderson
7121 Glouchester, Edina
Dear Mr. 'Iooty:
Thank you for your letter dated June 8, 1990. Ironically, that
same day a couple come into City Hall to personally register a
complaint regarding Dr. Anderson's illegal business activity.
Obviouslv, Dr. Anderson's activity is disruptive to the
neighborhood. We must and do order that the activity cease since
it does not comply with the Edina Ordinances as specified below:
1. Non - conforming use. Dr. Anderson's licensed psychological
practice is, in our opinion, classified similar to a medical or
dental office and is specifically prohibited by the ordinance. I
recognize you disagree with this interpretation.
At best, however, Dr. Anderson might be considered a professional
who, as vour letter states, provides "consultation ". Such
professionals. including, but not limited to, insurance agents
and brokers are permitted by the Ordinance provided they
"typically conduct client meetings outside of the dwelling
unit ". Since Dr. Anderson typically meets with clients in the
home her use is not permitted.
Finailv, Dr. Anderson is not a minister, rabbi or priest. She
has previously told me she is not ordained and does not hold
credentials qualifying her in that category.
2. Parking demands at the site are not within the driveway in
violation of the Ordinance.
3. Weekly, automobile trips generated by the use by individuals
other than the resident exceed ten.
Dr. Anderson schedules between 15 and 20 clients per week at the
home. All, to my knowledge, arrive and depart by automobile
resulting in between 15 and 20 automobile trips per week.
Regarding the comparison to music and dance instruction to five
or fewer pupils at a time, such uses must also comply with the
automobile trip limit. Some instructors, however, are able .
within the Ordinance to teach up to five students at- a time more
than once a week because their uses are often neighborhood -
specific. Students often walk or bicycle to the home from within
the neighborhood eliminating automobile trips.
We have come to our conclusion reluctantly after a thorough, fair
and consistent application of the Ordinance. Our hope is that
Dr. Anderson will be able to comply fully with the Ordinance by
July 19, 1990.
If you object to our interpretation you may appeal this
administrative decision to the Board of Appeals or seek an
Ordinance ammendment. Please contact me if you desire to discuss
this further.
Sincerely,
Philip S. Dommer
Senior Planner
cc: Dr. Anderson
JOYCE O. ANDERSON, PH.D., R.N.
Licensed Consulting Psychologist
7121 Glouchester Avenue
Edina, Minnesota 55435
(612)648 -7714
PROFESSIONAL CREDENTIALS
Licensed Consulting Psychologist ( Minnesota, 1988)
Licensed Psychologist (Minnesota, 1985)
Registered Nurse ( Minnesota, 1974)
SPECIALTIES REGISTERED WITH THE MINNESOTA BOARD OF PSYCHOLOGY
Individual, Couple, Family & Group Psychotherapy
Grief & Rehabilitation Therapy (Disease, Disability, Death, Divorce)
Counseling of Women & Their Special Concerns
Planning & Implementation of Care re: Emotional Needs of Hospitalized Patient, Family, Staff
Workshops /Lectures /Teaching re: Mental Health Concerns
EDUCATION- UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
DEGREES: PH.D., Counseling & Student Personnel Psychology 1986
M.S., Psychiatric - Mental Health Nursing 1976
B.S.N., Nursing 1974
ACADEMIC HONORS: Phi Beta Kappa
B.S. Nursing with High Distinction
Sigma Theta Tau, National Honor Society of Nursing
Pi Lambda Theta, National Honor & Professional Association in Education
EXPERIENCE
Private Practice: Counseling, Consultation, Workshops/ Lectures/ Teaching 1980 - present
Psychotherapist, University Boynton Student Health Service ( Ph.D. Internship) 1982 -1983
Mental Health Consultant, Medical- Surgical Areas, Abbott - Northwestern Hospital 1976 -1980
Anderson, J. G. ( 1987). The Relationship of Sex - Valued Personality Characteristics to Self -
Acceptance & Acceptance of Loss in Adult -Onset Physical Disability. ( Doctoral dissertation,
The University of Minnesota, 1986). Dissertation Abstracts International, 47 ( 9).
Anderson, J. G. ( 1976). Lisa. In Ida M. Martinson (Ed.), Home Care For the Dying Child -
Professional & Family Perspectives. New York: Appleton- Century- Crofts, 47 -51. .
RESEARCH- ASSOCIATED WITH GRADUATE STUDY
Identification of Psychosocial Stresses Experienced by the Mother Whose Child is in a
Prolonged Unconscious State Resulting from Acute Injury to the Brain, 1976.
The Relationship of Psychosocial Stresses Associated with Cystic Fibrosis to Parental
Understanding of the Genetics of the Disease, 1974.
`
�
_-- --- _----_'
_
' ��~` L^� .
..e�«� -��^Z��~ ���.
1
July 15, 1990
City Council
City of Edina
Dear Council Members:
We have been residents of Edina for 18 years residing at
7137 Glouchester Avenue.
For the last two years Dr. Joyce Anderson has lived at 7121
Glouchester Avenue. We feel she has been a good neighbor.
She has maintained her home and yard carefully, she
certainly has done nothing to annoy the neighbors such as
having animals run loose or children cutting thru yards.
She has been very respectful of the neighbors in scheduling
clients at her home. Her business creates no more traffic
than what we have had with neighborhood construction,
deliveries, teenage drivers, etc.
I would even suggest her business has less traffic than if
she were running a day care center or teaching piano
lessons.
If the issue is number of cars then I think as neighbors we
all need to look in our own driveways. Dr. Anderson has
one car of her own and when she has a client there it adds
up to two cars. With two teenage drivers we have three cars
at home. Some neighbors have four cars.
If the problem is type of clientele then I guess we would
have to question how anyone living in this day and age could
not understand since counseling is recommended for every
type of ailment. We all know very good people seeking
counseling.
We would hope the City Council will decide to let Joyce
continue seeing patients in her home. We would not want the
ordinance changed to allow people to set up businesses in
their homes but Dr. Anderson is handicapped and we feel an
exception should be made in her case.
Thank you.
Cordially,
Harry nd Betty Weing�rtner _
NA CD-
THE DESK OF ...
LEE WICKSTROM
July 15, 1990
Edina City Council
& Management
City Hall
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Council Members,
My wife, Kay and I have from 1984 to 1990, never been
disturbed by Dr. Joyce Anderson's intellectual
activity of helping and treatinq a visitor at her
home on a one -at -a -time basis.
Especially since Dr. Anderson is movement handicapped,
we encourage her to continue meeting individual
residents in her home.
Dr. Anderson is a wonderful neighbor who should not
be denied the right of intellectual assistance and
encouragement of other residents in her own home.
Sincerely,
LeRoy A. and Kay Wickstrom
eur.
PAUL D. JOHNSON 7108 Glouchester Ave., Edina, MN 55435 (612) 925 -4431
July 16, 1990
Mayor Fred Richards
Members of the City Council
City of Edina
Edina, MN
Re: Complaint Against Joyce Anderson
Ladies and Gentlemen:
It has recently been brought to our attention that a complaint has been
filed against Joyce Anderson for operating a business in her home in
violation of city ordinances.
We live across the street and three houses north of Joyce Anderson on Glou-
chester Avenue. Until we became aware of the complaint, we were not even
aware that Ms. Anderson was operating a business in her home. There has
been no noticeable increase in traffic in our neighborhood.
Ms. Anderson is a trained psychologist, but is also herself partially
physically disabled. She is unable to get around with ease, and can not
handle a client load of sufficient amount to be able to afford office space
outside of her home. If she would be prevented from having three or four
clients a day visit her in her home, she would be put out of business and
could not continue to live in this neighborhood.
We are not experts by any means on the technicalities of the law, but we do
know that what Ms. Anderson is doing is in no way a detriment to the area,
and certainly does not create any problems or additional traffic for the
neighbors. The traffic load is much less than that created by private
piano teachers, for example, who flourish in our city, and frequently have
parents dropping off and picking up students every half hour from the time
school lets out in the afternoon until 6:30 or 7:00 in the evening. If
a formal variance is needed in order to accomodate Ms. Anderson, we would
be whole - heartedly in support of such a variance specifically for her.
As parents of teen - agers, as many of you are or have been, we can assure
you that the traffic created by the business of Ms. Anderson is considerably
less than that generated by the average socially active 16 or 17 year old
in Edina with access to a car.
Thank you for your consideration. We would aAc that you find favorably for
Joyce Anderson and either dismiss the complaint, or grant her a variance.
Yours truly,
Paul D. J' hnson
""'A[lJolinson
\j l
y'
° 0 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO. Mayor & City Council
FRONt Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR ' PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00
DATE: 16 July, 1990
AGENDA ITEM VI. A.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: storm Sewer Projects STS -207 & STS -208
Company Amount of Quote or Eld
1• See Attached Tabulation 1:
2. 2
3. 3.
4. 41
5. 5;
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR END:
Glendale Contracting, Inc. $ 159,880.50
GENERAL INFORMATION:
The bid is for the following projects: Storm Sewer Project 207,
which is a pipe from the new Galleria project running from W. 70th
Street to Centennial Lakes. The second project (208) is a small
pipe running from France Avenue to the backyard of 5701 France.
The first project is funded by HRA and developer. The second
project is funded by the stormwater utility fund.
Slg4tur
The Recommended bid is
within budget not
Public Wnrkc - FngingPp_ing
Kenneth Rosla6ct City
Wallin, Fifp'ance Director
l
July 12, 1990
11:00 A.M.
BID TABULATION
CITY OF EDINA. MINNESOTA
CONTRACT 90 -8
Improvement Nos. STS -207 & STS -208
BIDDER
TOTAL
Glendale Contracting. Inc.
S 159,880.50
Northdale Construction Company Inc
S 165,607.85
G. L. Contracting. Inc.
S 175,407.96
Dave Perkins Contractine, Inc.
S 178,856.00
J. P. Norex, Inc.
S 192,896.05
Richard Knutson. Inc.
S 193,277.75
Progressive Contractors, Inc.
S 203,734.25
Brown & Cris. Inc.
S 203,912.50
Rice Lake Contracting
S 204,427.75
F. M. Frattalone Excavating & Grading Inc
S 204,611.50
S. M. Hentges & Sons. Inc.
S 230,542.85
B & D Underground, Inc.
S 232,316.00
Thomas and Sons Construction Inc
S 248,963.25
Barbarossa and Sons. Inc. S 255,929.90
Engineers Estimate S 196,177.00
lip
VII.A.
MINUTES
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
JULY 10, 1990
9:00 A.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Fran Hoffman, Chairman
Alison Fuhr
Craig Swanson
Gordon Hughes
MEMBERS ABSENT: Bob Sherman
OTHERS PRESENT: Jeff and Connie Cauble, 5700 Lois Lane
John Dushinske, 6621 Tracy Avenue South
Daniel Dushinske, 6621 Tracy Avenue South
Paul Dushinske, 6621 Tracy Avenue South
Jill Dushinske, 6621 Tracy Avenue South
Captain Len Kleven, Edina Police Department
Officer Brandon Deshler, TEU, Edina Police Department
Ms. Candy Fiedler, Engineering Department
SECTION A
Requests on which the Committee recommends approval as requested or modified,
and the Council's authorization of recommended action.
(1) Discuss traffic safety concerns on Tracy Avenue between West 70th Street
and Valley View Road.
Continued from June, 1990 meeting.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Hoffman handed out copies of a Mn /DOT traffic flow map depicting
average daily traffic counts of the Tracy Avenue area. He pointed out on
the map additional traffic counts taken by the Edina Engineering Department
of 2,176 average daily traffic at the North end of Tracy at 66th Street,
and 1,524 at the South end of .Tracy at 70th Street, and noted that the
traffic flow increased as you get closer to Crosstown.
Mr. Hoffman then stated that the Engineering Department also conducted a
one day truck traffic count at 70th and Tracy and that 25 vehicles had been
counted between 7:30 A.M. and 8:00 P.M. He said the 25 trucks counted
included four NSP rigs, school buses, recycling trucks, trucks from Best
Buy, Salvation Army, Bachman's, Culligan Water Service, Federal Express,
Schumacher's Meats, a plumbing company, an Edina towing service truck, two
. f.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES
July 9, 1990
Page 2
flatbed vehicles and an ice cream truck. From looking at the truck count
Mr. Hoffman concluded that some of the trucks were using Tracy as a short
cut route and he informed those present that he had contacted NSP and asked
the dispatcher not to route their trucks down Tracy Avenue. Mr. Hoffman
then recommended that "NO THRU TRUCK TRAFFIC" signs be placed on Tracy to
discourage trucks from using this route, but also mentioned that enforcing
could be difficult.
Residents attending presented their concerns about the volume of traffic,
the speed of the traffic and cars passing on Tracy Avenue. They asked
about getting additional STOP signs along Tracy Avenue. Mr. Swanson said
for the Committee to recommend stop signs it should be warranted and in
this case it is not.. Mr. Swanson added that in order to promote pedestrian
safety the best way is to separate pedestrians from automobiles, and
sidewalks are the preferred method of doing this.
Mr. Swanson moved to (1) Install "NO THRU TRUCK TRAFFIC" signs at the north
and south ends of Tracy Avenue: (2) Install "25 MPH" advisory signs with the
"PEDESTRIAN" sign: (3) Install yellow centerline striping to eliminate cars
from passine: (4) Notify NSP and comvanies that will be working in the Cahill
redevelopment area. discouraging them from utilizing the road: and (5)
recommend that the neighborhood seek a sidewalk petition. Mrs. Fuhr seconded
the motion. Motion carried 4 -0.
(2) Request for "NO PARKING" signs on Overholt Pass, 30 feet from end of street
on the west side..
Request received from Fran Hoffman, Edina Engineering Department.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Hoffman requested that "NO PARKING" signs be placed at the very end of
Overholt Pass due to the fact that when cars are parked on both sides of
the street, vehicles are forced to back down the street thereby creating a
traffic hazard.
Mr. Hughes moved to install NO PARKING signs on Overholt Pass. 30 feet from
the end of the street on the west side. Mrs. Fuhr seconded the motion.
Motion carried 4 -0.
SECTION B
Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request.
None.
SECTION C
Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others.
None.
EDINA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
Agenda Item VII.B
4909 Bywood West
Edina, MN 55436
July 5, 1990
Mayor Fred Richards
Edina City Hall
.4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mayor Richards,
As a newly appointed member of the Community Health Services Advisory
Board I am truly disappointed to have to submit my resignation.
My husband and I will be moving out of state within the next few
months..
I apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you. It would
have been a pleasure to serve a town that has given our family
such pleasure for 14 years.
My good wishes to you in your tenure as mayor, I hope when we
return to Edina in a few years I may again ask to assist you in
any way.
Yours Truly,
Anne S. Francis
r
;Ai�
Oi
\�keBB `ev/
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To. KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER
Agenda Item #
y_ux
From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Date: JULY 12, 1990
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject: MTC ROUTE 36
❑
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
0
Discussion
Recommendation:
Info /Background:
The attached notice of public hearing has been received regarding the proposed
discontinuance of week -day bus service on MTC Route 36 serving Minnetonka,
Edina and St. Louis Park. This matter has been placed on the Council Agenda
of July 16, 1990 for purposes of information and /or discussion.
G�
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Wednesday, July 25, 1990 at 7:30 p.m.
A public hearing will be held before the Metropolitan Transit Commission on
Wednesday, July 25, 1990 at 7:30 p.m. in the MTC Commission Chambers, 560 6th Ave.
No., Minneapolis, for the purpose of receiving public comment on the proposed
discontinuance of week -day bus service on MTC Route 36 serving Minnetonka, Edina
and St. Louis Park and for the proposed subcontracting of Saturday & Sunday bus
service on MTC Route 51 serving Minnetonka, Wayzata, Orono, Mound, Navarre and
Spring Park.
FARE INFORMATION
GENERAL INFORMATION
Adult Fare: Off -Peak/ *Peak MTC Convenience Fares: The MTC has convenience fares
Rides completely within Zone 2 .................. $ .50 $ .75 available as an alternative to carrying change.
NOTE: All Route 36 rides are considered to be within Zone 2.
Passengers transfering to or from Zone 1 routes must pay a zone
charge,
*Peak Hours - Monday - Friday 6-9 AM and 3:30 -6:30 PM.
Pay Policy:
Please have exact fare ready. Drivers carry no change.
Dollar bills not accepted.
Going towards downtown: (or on crosstown routes which
do not go downtown): Pay the full adult fare (see table
above). plus the 25C peak surcharge if it applies when
boarding.
From downtown: Pay the full adult Zone 1 tare of 509, plus
the 25C peak surcharge if it applies when boarding: and the
25C zone surcharge when alighting it it applies. See the route
map to determine if your trip crosses the fare zone limits.
• Prepaid tare users present your pass or ticket to the
driver when boarding and show it again when alighting in
Zone 2.
• The valueofa token is50 C. For any fare on rides exceeding
this value, the difference in fares will be accepted in exact
change.
Reduced Fares
Weekdays Irom 6 -9 a.m. and, rum 3.30 -6:30 p.m. all riders pay the
full adult fare including any applicable zone or express charge.
All other times (including weekends and holidays)
• Senior Citizens 65 and older pay 10C. Medicare card, MTC
endorsed drivers license or state ID card required to qualify for
the reduced fare.
• Persons 17 and younger pay 25C. YOUTH DISCOUNT CARD
required for persons 14.17 years.
• Disabled persons with MTC -ID card ride for 25C.
• Children under 6 free (limit 3) when accompanied by a paid
fare. No time restrictions apply for this reduced rate.
Reduced fare riders traveling from Zone 1 to Zone 2 should
show their ID to the driver when alighting during off -peak
hours In lieu of paying the zone charge.
Reduced fare riders who alight in Zone 2during peak hours
must pay the zone charge.
• All You Can Ride Cards offer unlimited bus riding for each
calendar month. The cost is based on your regular or express
fare. All You Can Ride Cards are available at a discount from
employers offering an MTC payroll deduction plan.
• Commuter Tickets have no expiration date. Each punch on
the card is worth its face value and may be combined with to-
kens, cash or unused punches from another card to pay a full
fare.
• Bus Tokens have a value of 50C.
In downtown Minneapolis. convenience fares are available at the
MTC Transit Store, 719 Marquette, 7:30 a.m. -5:30 p.m. Monday
through Friday or Dayton's. Carson Pirie Scott. Federal Court
Smoke Shop. Hennepin County Government Center, and
Riverplace.
In downtown SI. Paul. convenience fares are available at the St.
Paul Transit Store, American National Bank Skyway, 8:00 a.m. -
5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. and at Dayton's.
Convenience fares are also available at other department and
food stores, pharmacies, libraries. banks, schools and employ-
ment centers throughout the metropolitan area. For MTC sales
outlet information. call 827 -7733.
Transit Guides tell you which hoses service your area, how to
read a pocket schedule, how much it costs to ride the bus, and
how to use the Downtown Dime Zone.
They're free and are available at the MTC Transit Store -719
Marquette in Minneapolis and at the St. Paul Transit Store. Amer-
ican National Bank Skyway.
MTC Customer Relations Center: We encourage you to share
your comments about our service or staff. You can call 349 -7415
Monday through Friday 7:00 a.m. to 5:45 p.m., and Saturday 9:00
a.m. to 5:45 p.m.. Or you may write to: Metropolitan Transit
Commission, 560 -61h Ave. No., Minneapolis, MN 55411 -4398. Attn:
Customer Relations.
Lost and Found: MTC's Lost and Found is located at 570-6th
Ave. No. (just west of downtown Mpls.). You may call 349 -7418
Monday through Friday 7:00 a.m. to 5:45 p.m., and Saturday 9:00
a.m. to 5:45 p_m.
Transit Information Center: If you can't pick up a pocket
schedule, call 827 -7733 and an information representative will
help you.
Tell the information representative:
1 Where you are.
2. Where you are going,
3, When you would like to travel,
Transit Information Representatives are on duty from 6:00 a.m. -
11:00 p.m. weekdays and Irom 7:00 a.m. -11:00 p.m. weekends
and holidays.
Cityline will give you departure times for any MTC bus. Use
your TouchTone phone to call 6456060. category RIDE. 24 hours
a day, 7 days a week.
GETTING
BUS
INFORMATION
HAS FEVER
BEEN EASIER.
OR FASTER.
All you have to know is your
route number or zip code and City -
line can give you departure times
for the MTC bus you plan to ride.
Just use your Touch -Tone* phone
to call 645 -6060 and request cate-
gory RIDE (7433).
You can use Cityline 24 hours a
day, 7 days a week!
*If your phone makes a clicking sound when
you push the numbers, it is not a Touch -
Tone phone.
645 -6060
I *__J
t'
i —
IUipls.
s
0
0
A¢
Ridgedale
Nufgedaln Dr
■ Henn. Co.
Government
Serv. Ctr.
Minnetonka
�a
\ I 60"y �, °CF�,
tp ° General m
m Mills E
M Interchange
South Offices
c
Franklin c
St. Louis Park gl
J
Walker
❑ Time Point
■ Points of Interest
........... Fare Limits
ePark end Ride
ununwu Limited Service
491h St,
Edina
ROUTE INFORMATION
Park 8 Ride Locations
Minnetonka
Ridgedale Shopping Center - Highway 12 8 Plymouth Road - portion of
lot along perimeter road northeast of Carson Pirie Scott.
Edina
Southdale Shopping Center - overflow lot along 66th Street east of
Firestone.
Schedule subject to change.
Rsereetions�
Center 38�c
9th St
Miracle Mlle
.0 Shopping Center
v
D
°0
0
3
Y Vn O I
W ;
a a
d
66th SI e
■
69th SI. 0 Southdole
Rio. 6, 1S, 18,
28, 78, 86, 89
Hwy 12 Louis Louis Excel
Henn Infer- Gen- Penn -lane -lane Oa- -star 44th 60th
-epin Ridge change oral -syl Cedar Minne kota Rec. Wood Wood Wood South
_._ Ctr. __dale_ Office Mills -trams LkRd -tonke Lake Ctr. • ale -date -dole -dale
AM.-- AM AM AM --AM AM AM AM AM AM AM AM AM_
656 700 703 707 710 715 718 723735_
3111A,- §01__80 — 816_820 _2 827 JX__835_ 8 843 855
36A . 851 __855 -- -- 906 910 913 917 920 925 928 933 945 _
3GA._ 1020 _-1026 -- -- 1036 1040 1043 1047 1050 1055 1058 1103 1110
PM -,- PM PM PM PM PM PM P P71i__ PM PM PM FM_
36A 1220 - .1226 -- _ _123¢ 1 4 1 4 . 1247 1255_ 12� 103 ]10__
36A _22022¢-- 236_ 247 250 255 258 303 310
36A_ 424_428 436 440 452 _ 459 503 506 511 514 519 X31
SERVICE OPERATES MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY EXCEPT ON THE FOLLOWING HOLIDAYS New Year's
Memorial Day. Independence Day, Labor Day. Thanksgiving and Christmas.
Monday thru Friday
Northbound
Excel Louis Louis HwY12
501h 441h -&for Oa- -lane -lane Penn
Gen- Inter-
Henn -
Flwy 12
South
Wood Wood Wood Rec. kits Mlnne Cedar -syl
oral change Ridge
spin
Rt. 51 _ _ dale _,—
da1e_AaIB_Q118__GL._ Uke -IgrJka lkgd__v�nla
ILE_QQ]_{B _Q�e_�L_
AM
AM _AM AM _ AM AM __ Aft_. —.AN_
AM AM AM
__.
36A
_ _ -Sz4¢ —652 __ I ---------
-- -
- -- -
36�_ k53
70 7Z 716 � 724 728 731 735
739 743 751
755_
36C -.743
_
_155802 806 811 814 818 821 825
829 833 841
845
36G__ 903
915 920 923 928 931 935 938 942
— — 951
955
36C, 953
1005 1010 1013 1018 1021 1025 1028 1032
-- -- 1041
1045
36C- _1123_1135
1140 1143 1148 1151 1155 1158 1202
-- -- 1211
1215
Rte 17 67 PM
36C _ M__
PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM
135 140 143 148 151 155 158 202
PM PM PM
-- -- 211
PM
21�__
36C 315 _
327 .332 - .335__ 10 -_343__VZ_350 --- 354 .....
-- .... -- ._.403__,407
A 36A 540
552 _ 557 . 600 , 603 _ _608 _ _612 - -- 615. _619_,
491h St,
Edina
ROUTE INFORMATION
Park 8 Ride Locations
Minnetonka
Ridgedale Shopping Center - Highway 12 8 Plymouth Road - portion of
lot along perimeter road northeast of Carson Pirie Scott.
Edina
Southdale Shopping Center - overflow lot along 66th Street east of
Firestone.
Schedule subject to change.
Rsereetions�
Center 38�c
9th St
Miracle Mlle
.0 Shopping Center
v
D
°0
0
3
Y Vn O I
W ;
a a
d
66th SI e
■
69th SI. 0 Southdole
Rio. 6, 1S, 18,
28, 78, 86, 89
Hwy 12 Louis Louis Excel
Henn Infer- Gen- Penn -lane -lane Oa- -star 44th 60th
-epin Ridge change oral -syl Cedar Minne kota Rec. Wood Wood Wood South
_._ Ctr. __dale_ Office Mills -trams LkRd -tonke Lake Ctr. • ale -date -dole -dale
AM.-- AM AM AM --AM AM AM AM AM AM AM AM AM_
656 700 703 707 710 715 718 723735_
3111A,- §01__80 — 816_820 _2 827 JX__835_ 8 843 855
36A . 851 __855 -- -- 906 910 913 917 920 925 928 933 945 _
3GA._ 1020 _-1026 -- -- 1036 1040 1043 1047 1050 1055 1058 1103 1110
PM -,- PM PM PM PM PM PM P P71i__ PM PM PM FM_
36A 1220 - .1226 -- _ _123¢ 1 4 1 4 . 1247 1255_ 12� 103 ]10__
36A _22022¢-- 236_ 247 250 255 258 303 310
36A_ 424_428 436 440 452 _ 459 503 506 511 514 519 X31
SERVICE OPERATES MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY EXCEPT ON THE FOLLOWING HOLIDAYS New Year's
Memorial Day. Independence Day, Labor Day. Thanksgiving and Christmas.
r�
Notice t
PUBLIC HEARING
ROUTES 369 78, 88 and 89
The Metropolitan Transit Commission will hold a public
hearing on August 30, 1990, at 7:00 p.m. This hearing will
take place in the Helen A. Young Room of the Southdale
Public Library, 7001 York Avenue So., Edina.
r� •
The purpose of this hearing is to receive public comment on the
proposed changes:
- Discontinue Route 36 weekday service serving the areas of
Minneapolis, Edina, St. Louis Park and Minnetonka.
- Discontinue Route 78 weekday service serving the areas of
Edina, Richfield and Bloomington.
- Discontinue Route 88 weekday and Saturday service serving
the areas of Edina, Richfield and Bloomington.
- Discontinue Route 89 weekday and Saturday service serving
the areas of Edina and Bloomington.
If you are unable to attend and wish to comment, please
forward your written comments to:
Metropolitan Transit Commission
Service Planning & Scheduling
560 - 6th Avenue North
Minneapolis, MN 55411
M E T R O P O L I T A N T R A N S I T C O. M M I S S 1 0 N-
560-6th Avenue North, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55411 -4398 612/349 -7400
[T]
Notice to Riders
PUBLIC HEARING
ROUTES 36 and 51
The Metropolitan Transit Commission will hold a public
hearing on July 25, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. This hearing will take
place at the .offices of the Metropolitan Transit Commission,
560 - 6th Avenue North, Minneapolis, MN.
The purpose of this hearing is to receive public comment on the
proposed discontinuance of the Route 36 and the proposed
subcontracting of the Saturday, Sunday and Holiday service on
Route 51.
If you are unable to attend and wish to comment, please
forward your written comments to:
Metropolitan Transit Commission
Service Planning & Scheduling
560 - 6th Avenue North
Minneapolis, MN 55411
M E T R O P O L I T A N T R A.N S I T C O M M I S S 1 O N
560 -6th Avenue North, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55411 -4398 612/349 -7400
1146
A.
o e= r .
�\ e C
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor Richards and City Counci
From: Bob Kojetin, Director
Agenda Item # VII D
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Date: July 13, 1990 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
Subject: ❑ To Council
Park Board Recommendation Action 0 Motion
Bantam National Tournament
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
Recommendation:
National Bantam Hockey Tournament to be held at Braemar Arena.
Mr. Jenkins MOVED THAT THE EDINA HOCKEY ASSOCIATION PURSUE THE HOSTING OF TEE
TOURNAMENT AT BRAEMAR ARENA. Bill Lord SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED.
Info /Background:
ifr. Christianson stated this meeting is being called to make a recommendation on
a renuest from.the Edina hockey Association to host the Bantam National Tournament
at 3raemar Arena. Mr. Kojetin indicated that Peter Warner of FHA asked if the
Dark Board and City Council would recommend and help EHA secure the National Bantam
Tournament to be held at Braemar Anril 4 -7, 1991. Mr. Kojetin indicated that tie
discussed this with Larry Thayer, Manager of Braemar Arena. r '-r. Thaver submitted
a memo regarding the impact of time and costs to the arena. In Mr. Thayer's memo
he indicated this would be an excellent time for hosting a tournament. The
hockey season is over with and the arena would be available. Also, at this time
it is estimated $2,000 to $3,000 would be generated over what is normal revenue .
during this particular weekend. It is Mr. Kojetin's feeling that the Park
Board should recommend that EHA try to secure this tournament for Braemar Arena.
At present the National Bantam Tour has been awarded.to the State of Minnesota and
on July 21 will be awarded to some city within the state of Minnesota. It is
ERA's hope that Edina will be awarded the site. Mr. Kojetin also indicated
that in the 1950's Braemar Arena hosted this same National Tournament for Bantams.
EDINA PARK BOARD
7:30 p.m.
July 10, 1990
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
MEMBERS PRESENT: Bob Christianson, Bill Lord, Bill Jenkins, Andrew
Montgomery, Beth Hall, Chip Sour
MEMBERS ABSENT: Jean Rydell, Pat Vagnoni, Scott Johnson, James Fee, Mac
Thayer
STAFF PRESENT: Bob Kojetin
A Park Board meeting was held in conjunction with the Braemar Inspection Tour.
The meeting was called to order by Bob Christianson at 8:00 p.m.
1. EHA HOSTING NATIONAL BANTAM TOURNAMENT AT BRAEMAR ARENA
Mr. Christianson stated this meeting is being called to make a
recommendation on a request from the Edina Hockey Association to host the
Bantam National Tournament at Braemar Arena. Mr. Kojetin indicated that
Pete Warner of the Edina Hockey Association (EHA) asked if the Park Board
and City Council would recommend and help EHA secure the National Bantam
Tournament to be held at Braemar April 4 -7, 1991. Mr. Kojetin indicated he
discussed this with Larry Thayer, Manager of Braemar Arena. Mr. Thayer
submitted a memo regarding the impact of time and costs to the arena. In
Mr. Thayer's memo he indicated this would be an excellent time for hosting
a tournament. The hockey season is over with and the arena would be
available. Also, at this time it is estimated $2,000 to $3,000 would be
generated over what is normal revenue during this particular weekend. It
is Mr. Kojetin's feeling that the Park Board should recommend that EHA try
to secure this tournament for Braemar Arena.
At present the National Bantam Tour has been awarded to the State of
Minnesota and on July 21 will be awarded to some city within the state of
Minnesota. It is EHA's hope that Edina will be• awarded the site. Mr.
Kojetin also indicated that in the 1960's Braemar Arena hosted this same
National Tournament for Bantams.
Mr. Jenkins MOVED THAT THE EDINA HOCKEY ASSOCIATION PURSUE THE HOSTING OF
THE TOURNAMENT AT BRAEMAR ARENA. Bill Lord SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION
CARRIED.
W,.
EDINA GYMNASTICS ASSOCIATION
Mr. Kojetin brought up a second item of information. The Edina Gymnastics
Association (EGA) at present has approximately 500 students. Because of
this low enrollment EGA is not able to make its financial commitments to
the 2 1/2 years left on the lease of their facility without creating a
deficit.
EGA has solicited three other Twin Cities gymnastics private clubs to see
if they would be interested in purchasing EGA. The Edina Gymnastics
Association through interviewing have selected the.TAGS Gymnastics
Association, which is located in Burnsville, Hopkins and Inver Grove
Heights. The Edina Gymnastics Association feels that this organization
would do the best job in taking over EGA's lease and equipment. At
present, it is estimated that the equipment is worth zero to $40,000.
Mr. Kojetin indicated some concerns: What commitment can the City of Edina
have with a private organization compared to what they have with the other
10 Athletic Associations? Can the same relationship continue with the new
private organization as it has with the Edina Gymnastics Association? This
issue will be discussed further at the August Park Board meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
Bill Lord MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 8:30 P.M. Bill Jenkins SECONDED
THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED.
R
VA
'Ty OF ED
INA
7501 South County Road 18 • Edina. Minnesota 55435 • (612) 941 -1322
CITY OF EDINA
BRAEMAR ARENA
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: July 9, 1990
TO: Bob Kojetin
FROM: Larry Thayer, Manager - Braemar Arena t—
SUBJECT: National Bantam Tournament
Peter warzter of the Edina Hockey Association has requested to use
Braemar Arena to host the National Bantam Hockey Tournament April
4 -7, 1091. I feel that the new complex is the perfect site to
host this event and would generate $2,000 - $3,000 in additional
revenue, through ice rental and concessions, that we normally
would not take in over that weekend. I'm sure the event would be
as well received as the regional figure skating competitions we
hosted in 1990. These events really had a positive impact on the
figure skating world because of our new facility!
LT /njk
na Park and Recreation Department
July 10, 1990
Mr. Kenneth Rosland
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Ken:
Would you please place the Edina Foundation on the July 16th
Council meeting under Miscellaneous. We wish to talk to them about
appointments to the Board and also this Super or Advisory Board to get
their approval of the same. We appear before the School Board on July
23rd.
Yours tru
ames Van Valkenburg
JVV:jd
cc: Marylou Birkeland
Agenda Item VII.E
THOMSEN
LAW OFFICES
N +BFAX
SUITE 600, EDINBOROUGH CORPORATE CENTER EAST
JOHNSON
3300 EDINBOROUGH WAY, MINNEAPOLIS (EDINA), MINNESOTA 55435
BOUQUET T
V�BURG
(612) 835 -7000 • FAX: (612) 835 -9450
VAN
O���r�►7��iAY
GLENN G. NYBECK MARSH J. HALBERG OF COUNSEL:
&
GORDON V. JOHNSON WILLIAM E. SJOHOLM JACK W. CARLSON
SI�/� !y Ps.
�-� a_! Ica
JOHN K. BOUOUET THOMAS R. KELLEY RICHARD D. WILSON, P.A.
JAMES VAN VALKENBURG DENNIS M. PATRICK HELGE THOMSEN. RETIRED
MARK G. OHNSTAD PHILIP SIEFF
DONALD D. SMITH DAVID J. MCGEE
July 10, 1990
Mr. Kenneth Rosland
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Ken:
Would you please place the Edina Foundation on the July 16th
Council meeting under Miscellaneous. We wish to talk to them about
appointments to the Board and also this Super or Advisory Board to get
their approval of the same. We appear before the School Board on July
23rd.
Yours tru
ames Van Valkenburg
JVV:jd
cc: Marylou Birkeland
1
o e `gip
• `N�bRBppMSY'v •
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: KEN ROSLA1M, 11ANAGER
Agenda Item #
VIII.A
From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK
Consent
Information Only
❑
Date: JULY 12, 1990
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject: PETITION FOR SIDE14ALK -
a
To Council
RIDGEVIEW DRIVE
Action
0
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
That the Council refer the attached petition for sidewalk on Ridgeview Drive
to the Engineering Department for processing.
Info /Background:
A petition dated June 27, 1990 has been received signed by residents in the area
of Ridgeview Drive requesting construction of sidewalk. I have placed this
matter on the Council Agenda for July 16, 1990 to acknowledge receipt thereof.
Our normal procedure is for the Council to refer the petition to Engineering
for processing.
RIDGEVIEW DR. SIDEWALK PETITION
FACT: A 1989 traffic study of Ridgeview Drive (a collector street), showed
that there was an average of 1,500 vehicles per day!
Please sign'the attached sidewalk petition to allow Ridgeview Drive to become
a safer street for all pedestrians .
All we need are the signatures of atleast 50% of the affected property owners
to take this before the City Council and get our sidewalk.
As Ridgeview Drive is a collector street, installation of the sidewalk will be
paid for by the state aid system and no properties will be assessed for the cost
of the sidewalk and said sidewalk•.will be maintained (including snow removal),
ty the City of Edina. A.
After the attached sidewalk petition is completed, it will be submitted to
the Edina City Hall and a public hearing will be held. Notification will be
sent to all affected property owners and we urge your family to attend this
very important meeting'to show your support.
Petitioners: Nancy Braun
6508 Ridgeview Dr.
Edina, Mn. 55439
944 -5581
Nancy Lawrence
6512 Ridgeview Dr.
Edina, Mn. 55439
944 -1747
0
PETITION FOR SIDEWALK CROSSWALKS & YIELD TO PEDESTRIAN SIGNS
OATED__jgne, 27. 1990
TO THE CITY CODUCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA-
The undersigned represent that they are Edina residents and would utilize the
proposed sidewalk.
$pith ci de.laf !al l p3( f anp bet��een� ppk Dri vp and Ri dgPitieia T) iY°
Wpst. ci -riF`f Ri dgpvi w Dr' .between i.i mpri nk and 66th Strppt
No h aid "f66th street between Ridizeview Drive and warrpn
etween and _
between and
and her b ddet�I� I PP that sId -walk �.bep gco�npstructe or A5uI IV tt aid I cat io s, t
i�icuga�iow'�iSv�ado t ai{�esi p�a���ie� $a��iO>?isbieefsI�l�iai�itcor by
d "d��raYTc.
SIGNATURE OF OWNERS
ADDRESS DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
1 A O .
n.50 7 12U,'
_ems
•
UFO
Ma ME
P29M,
I %so i
53�5)-Lv,6y
This petition was circulated by v Nancy Lawrence
9�511019 Ridgeview Dr. 6512 Ridgeview Dr.
R -74 Edina, Mn. 55439 Edina, Mn. 55439
944 -5581 944 -1747
I-1i
1 yyJ./
r�
PETITIMI FOR SIDEVALY,,CROSSWALKS & YIELD TO PEDESTRIAN SIGNS
7ATED__,jy1= 27, 1990
TO THE CITY CMICIL.OF THE CITY OF EDINA-
The undersigned represent that they are a majority of the owners of the
property fronting on the foliowing strouts in the City of Edina:
Cnuth side of Vall between Creek Drive and Ridgeview Drive
wa_¢t SirLa of Ridgeview Drive between Limerick and bbth Street
Nnrth side Pf fi6th Street betdeen Ridgeview Drive and Warren
between- and _
etween and
and herebv petition that sidewalk be constructed (or rebuilt) at said locations, with
crosswalks & yield to pedestrian signs appropriately placed,with the costs to be paid for by
the state aid system and that the City of Edina be held responsible for all maintenance
(including snow removal), of said sidewalk.
SIGNATURE OF 04RIERS ADDRESS DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
rr ,
This petition was circulated by Nancy Braun Nancy Lawrence
5TH 08 Ridgeview Dr. 6512 Ridgeview Dr.
R -74 Edina, Mn. 55439 Edina, Mn. 55439
944 -5581 944 -1747
_I
THOMSEN
NYBECK
JOHNSON
BOUQUET
VAN VALBENBURG
OHNST" &
SNML P.A.
Agenda Item XII.A
LAW OFFICES
SUITE 600, EDINBOROUGH CORPORATE CENTER EAST
3300 EDINBOROUGH WAY, MINNEAPOLIS (EDINA), MINNESOT<. 55435
(612) 835 -7000 • FAX: (612) 835 -9450
GLENN G. NYBECK MARSH J. HALBERG OF COUNSEL,
GORDON V. JOHNSON WILLIAM E. SJOHOLM JACK W. CARLSON
JOHN K. BOUOUET THOMAS R. KELLEY RICHARD D. WILSON, P.A.
JAMES VAN VALKENBURG DENNIS M. PATRICK HELGE THOMSEN. RETIRED
MARK G. OHNSTAD PHILIP SIEFF
DONALD D. SMITH DAVID J. MCGEE -
July 12, 1990
The Honorable Fredrick Richards
and Members of Edina City Council
4801 W. 50th STreet
Edina, Minnesota 55424
RE: Vernon Terrace
Ladies and Gentlemen:
This matter is before you for final approval of the
refinancing and new bonds. We appeared before you a month or six
weeks ago and you asked certain questions.
First off this matter has now gone before the District
- Court of Ramsey County and there is an Order for instruction and
confirmation in the administration of the current trust. I am
'enclosing copies of that.
I call particular,attention to the comments of the Court in
paragraph 7.
They have approved the Six Million Dollar figure and have
approved the offer of the Pension Fund to purchase, and had analyzed
the appraisals.
Prior to this time I sent to you the appraisals and it is
my understanding they were reviewed in particular detail by Council
members Rice and Paulus.
-2-
I have a list of the bond holders and inasmuch as it runs
some 50 pages I am not enclosing a copy of it at this time. If any of
you wish to look at it I will have it at the hearing and you certainly
are entitled to review the same. Until now this has been a confiden-
tial list but inasmuch as it was a matter of the Court hearing it
becomes public record.
Many of the bonds are listed in street names. However, I
count some 40 Edina residents who are owners of bonds and they total
approximately $485,000.
The question has been raised at the last hearing as to the
effect of a foreclosure and /or bankruptcy. Either of them would mean
that the bond holders would receive less they they would receive now;
this would give a bad name to the project which would be disruptive not
only to the bond holders but to the tenants, and thus this seems to me
a much better way to go. As the documents indicate the bond holders
would receive approximately 58% of the principal amount due and that
would close very promptly.
I indicated that the Electrical Union Pension Fund had
substantial assets. Audits attached to. the bond documents indicate
that the Pension in April, 1990 had net assets of something in excess
of 42 million dollars and another annuitv fund where the assets in 1989
were in excess of 27 million dollars. Thus our figure that the Pension
Fund has approximately 70 million dollars in assets is right on line.
This is important as the Pension Fund is the guarantor. .
Certainly if there are any questions I would be happy to
answer them now or at the hearing.
One other figure of importance is that at the current time
129 of the 146 units, or 88% are leased.
I would appreciate your consideration in authorizing the
issuance of these new bonds and the refinancing to pay off the old bond
holders.
Your
JVV:jd
Van Val nburg
P. S.
I might advise that Mr. Gilligan of the Dorsev office -has
reviewed all documents for the City and I am not aware of any objec-
tions that he has.
JVV
i
Agenda Item XII.A.1
MEMORANDUM
TO: Edina City Council
FROM: Thomas S. Erickson, City Attorney
DATE: July 16,1990
RE: Mortgage Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Vernon Terrace Project)
Because of the lack of a firm settlement as evidenced by the attached
letter, and because the City should be in a position to act relative to another
refunding proposal if the existing proposal is not completed, I recommend that the
following resolution be adoped in addition to the one recommended by Leonard,
Street & Deinard on behalf of Ohmega Building Corporation:
RESOLVED, that the foregoing resolution is contingent upon the
Company and the Guarantors reaching a settlement with First Trust
National Association for payment of the existing Multifamily Mortgage
Revenue Bonds issued by the City for the 'Vernon Terrace Project prior
to rescission of the foregoing resolution by the City Council.
T. S. E.
TSE:kks
DORSEY 8c ` rxxTwEy
nI•aur—... .i— C'OIII` IATI(•Nn
0 NHELMER WC'LFF & DONNELLY
1
kse Bank Banding
Brussels
5iute 1700
Ciacago
St. Paul. MN 55101
London
(612) 223.25M
Minneapolis
Telex:701B79
New York
FAX: (612) 223.2596
Paris
St. Paul
Wsslungton. D. C
July 13, 1990
Persons on the Attached Distribution List
Re: City Of Edina, Ming *sot& Multifamily
Mortgage Revenue Bonds (Vernon Terrace Project)
- Default settlement
Ladies and Gentlemen!
First Trust has received no written response from any party
regarding the status of matters discussed in my letter to you
dated June 29, 1990. Jim Druek, in response to my telephone
inquiry on July 9, indicated that major issues in the dispute
appeared to have been resolved but some details or related
issues were not yet agreed to by the parties. No further
information has been forthcoming. Therefore, First Trust is
no longer bound by its prior settlement agreement.
If and when the parties can complete resolution of their
disputes, and proceed to closing and settlement on the same
terms as previously offered, First Trust will again consider
such settlement arrangements in light of then available
alternative actions, based upon the best interests of
Bondholders, but First Trust is now free to pursue and consider
such alternatives.
Thank you for your attention.
Very truly yours,
0, 4VLk-i
Craig Curr e
CC: cad -✓
cc: Mr. James Ehrenberg.
Ms. Polly Nemec
Patrick J. McLaughlin, Esq.
1'
SIDNEY LORBER'
STONEY BARROWS'
HAROLD D. FIELD, JR.•
•ALLEN I. SAEKS•
THOMAS D. FEINBERG'
MORRIS M- SHERMAN'
GEORGE REILLY•
CHARLES K. DAYTON
DAVID N. COX'
STEPHEN R.PFLAUM-
CHARLES A. MAYS'
LOWELLJ.NOTEBOOM'
GEORGE F. MCGUNNIGLE. JR.
RICHARD G.- PEPIN. JR.
FREDRIC T, ROSENBLATT•
BRRON E. STARNS'
JOHN H, HERMAN
STEVEN D. DERUYTER•
JAMES R. DORSEY
KATHLEEN M. GRAHAM
STEPHEN J. DAVIDSON'
STEPHEN R. LITMAN'
DAVID C. ZALK'
EDWARD M. MCERSFELDER'
Agenda Item XII.A.1
LAW OFFICES
LEONARD, STREET AND DEINARD
ROBERT LEWIS BARROWS'
SUITE 2300
KENT E. RICHEY
PETER H. BACHMAN
RICHARD J. WEGENER
150 SOUTH FIFTH STREET
HUGH M. MAYNARD'
SHAUN C. MCELHATTON
FREDERICK W. MORRIS
MINNEAPOLIS, M I N N ESOTA 55402
JOHNC.KUEHN
JAMES R. BEHRENBRINKER
BRADLEY J. GILLAN
TELEPHONE (612) 335 -1500
MICHAEL A. NEKICH•
PETER E. SCHIFSKY
MARTHA C. BRAND'
FACSIMILE (612) 335 -1657
DAVID N. HAYNES
RONALD J. SCHULTZ
CAROLYN CHALMERS
CAROLYN V. WOLSKI
JAMES V. ROTH'
STEVEN J. RINDSIG
ROBERT L. OEMAY
JAMA M. KRIZ
ANGELA M. BOHMANN
ROBERT P. THAVIS'
JAMES G. BULLARD'
GEORGE B. LEONARD 1187219361
JOSEPH M. FINLEY'
LAWRENCE J. FIELD
J. FIELL D
July 12 , 1990
DAVID W. KELLEY
BENEDICT DEINARD 11699.19691
MARK S. WEITZ'
AMOS S. DEINARD II898 19851
DAVID L. LILLEHAUG
DAVID KANTOR
_
ANGELA M. CHRISTY
IRENE SCOTT
MARK A. LINDGREN
oROV -1011L CORPO0171015
DANIEL O. FOTH
VIA MESSENGER
Marcella Daehn, City Clerk
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
MICHAEL L. BESIDE
STEVE BELTON
LOWELL V. STORTZ
PETER H. BACHMAN
DOUGLAS B. GREENSWAG
MARC D. SIMPSON
ELLEN G. SAMPSON
SHAUN C. MCELHATTON
MARGARET M. VAN VALKENSURG
JAMES J. BERTRAND
ROSANNE NATHANSON
JAMES R. BEHRENBRINKER
SM ERRIL.KNUTH
MARK W. DELEHANTY
MICHAEL G. TAYLOR
PETER E. SCHIFSKY
JOHN W. GETSINGER
LAWRENCE P. SCHAEFER
THOMAS P. SANDERS
RONALD J. SCHULTZ
ROBERT ZEGLOVITCH
CAROLYN V. WOLSKI
TIMOTHY WELCH
STEVEN J. RINDSIG
GREGORY C. BROWN
JAMA M. KRIZ
SUSAN M. ROBINER
DEBRA G. STREHLOW
PEDER A. LARSON
GEORGE B. LEONARD 1187219361
MICHAEL R. COHEN
ARTHUR L. H. STREET I1877 19611
NANCY WILTGEN REIBERT
BENEDICT DEINARD 11699.19691
VIRGINIA B. CONE
AMOS S. DEINARD II898 19851
CATHARINE BOSCHEE
MICHELLE A. MILLER
_
TIMOTHY R. MEYERSON
IRENE SCOTT
JENNIFER K. PARK
DANIEL O. FOTH
BLAKE SHEPARD. JR.
DANIEL M. SATORIUS
WILLIAM L. GREENE
Or COUNSEL
WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER
(612) 335 -1585
Re: Resolution Authorizing the Issuance of Multifamily
Mortgage Revenue Refunding Bonds (Vernon Terrace
Project), Series 1990
Dear Ms. Daehn:
Enclosed please find the above - described Resolution which is
to be included on the agenda for the City Counsel meeting on
Monday, July 16, 1990.
Please feel free to call me at the above - listed number should
you have any comments or questions regarding the Resolution.
SJR \sjr
Enclosures
cc: Kent E. Richey
Jerry Gilligan
253 \e1ecwcrk \daehn.1tr
Very truly yours,
LEONARD, STREET AND DEINARD
By '�5
Steven J. Rindsig
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION
AUTHORI21NG THE ISSUANCE OF
MULTIFAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS
(Vernon Terrace Project)
SERIES 1990
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council ") of the City
of Edina, Minnesota (the "City ") as follows:
1. The Council has received a request from Ohmega Building
Corporation, a Minnesota non - profit Corporation (the "Company "),
that the City undertake to refinance a multifamily rental housing
development as herein described pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 462A and 462C, as amended (the "Act ") , through issuance by
the City of its Multifamily Mortgage Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Vernon Terrace Project) , Series 1990 in an aggregate principal
amount of $6,735,000 (the "Bonds ") to refund in part Multifamily
Mortgage Revenue Bonds (Vernon Terrace Project) issued by the City
in the original principal amount of $12,600,000 (the "Prior Bonds ")
to refund prior obligations of the City issued to finance the
acquisition, construction and installation of a 146 -unit
multifamily housing rental project (the "Project ") together with
related costs, developed on an approximate 3.5 acre parcel of land
located at 5420 Vernon Avenue in the City.
2. The Project is reserved for rental in part by persons of
low and moderate income, with at least twenty percent (20 %) of the
units held for occupancy by families or individuals with adjusted
income not in excess of eighty percent (80 %) of the median family
income estimated by the United States Department of Housing and
Urban Development for the Minneapolis /St. Paul standard
metropolitan statistical area.
4. It is proposed that, pursuant to a Loan Agreement
proposed to be dated as of July 1, 1990, between the City and the
Company (the "Loan Agreement ") , the City will loan the proceeds of
the Bonds to the Company in order to satisfy and refund the Prior
Bonds. The Loan Repayments (as defined in the Loan Agreement) to
be made by the Company under the Loan Agreement are fixed so as to
produce revenue sufficient (together with revenues derived from the
investment of funds and accounts relating to the Bonds) to pay the
principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds when due.
It is further proposed that the City assign its rights to the Loan
Repayments and certain other rights under the Loan Agreement to
First Trust National Association, in St. Paul, Minnesota (the
"Trustee ") as security for payment of the Bonds under an Indenture
of Trust proposed to be dated July 1, 1990 (the "Indenture ").
5. Prior to the date of issuance of the Prior Bonds, the
City approved and submitted to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency
( "MHFA") a "financing program" for the Project as required by
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, and MHFA approved the financing
program, and no new or amended financing program need be submitted
to MHFA in connection with the issuance of the Bonds.
6. Forms of the following documents have been submitted to
this Council for approval:
(a) the Loan Agreement;
(b) the Indenture;
(c) a Mortgage, Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security
Agreement and Fixture Financing Statement (the
"Mortgage ") from the Company to the Trustee proposed to
be dated July 1, 1990;
(d) a Guaranty Agreement among Electrical Workers Local 292
Annuity Plan, Electrical Workers Local 292 Pension Fund
(each a "Guarantor ", or collectively, the "Guarantors ")
and the Trustee;
(e) a Bond Purchase Agreement (the "Bond Purchase Agreement ")
among the Company, the City, the Guarantors and Miller
& Schroeder Financial, Inc. (the Underwriter ");
(f) a Remarketing Agreement (the "Remarketing Agreement ")
between the Company, the Trustee and Miller & Schroeder
Financial, Inc. (the "Remarketing Agent ") proposed to be
dated July 1, 1990;
(g) a Certificate of Amendment between the City, the Trustee
and the Company; and
(h) Preliminary Official Statement with respect to the Bonds.
7. It is hereby found, determined and declared that:
(a) the Project described in the Loan Agreement and Indenture.
referred to above constitutes a multifamily rental
housing development authorized by the Act;
(b) the purpose of the Project is and the effect has been to
promote the public welfare by providing additional
decent, safe and sanitary rental housing opportunities
for low and moderate income persons within the City;
(c) the Project is located within the City limits;
(d) the refinancing of the Project, the issuance and sale of
the Bonds, the execution and delivery by the City of the
Loan Agreement, the Bond Purchase Agreement, the
Certificate of Amendment and the Indenture, and the
performance of all covenants and agreements of the City
contained in the Loan Agreement, the Bond Purchase
Agreement, the Certificate of Amendment and the Indenture
and of all other acts and things required under the
constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to make
the Loan Agreement, the Bond Purchase Agreement, the
Certificate of Amendment, Indenture and Bonds valid and
binding obligations of the City in accordance with their
terms, are authorized by the Act;
(e) it is desirable that the Prior Bonds be refunded and that
the Bonds be issued by the City upon the terms set forth
in the Indenture;
(f) the Underwriter has determined that the Loan Repayments
under the Loan Agreement are fixed to produce revenue
sufficient to provide for the prompt payment of principal
of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds issued
under the Indenture when due, and the Loan Agreement and
Indenture also provide that the Company is required to
pay all expenses of the operation and maintenance of the
Project, including, but without limitation, adequate
insurance thereon and insurance against all liability for
injury to persons or property arising from the operation
thereof, and all taxes and special assessments levied
upon or with respect to the Project premises and payable
during the term of the Loan Agreement and Indenture;
(g) under the provisions of the Act, and as provided in the
Loan Agreement and Indenture, the Bonds are not to be
payable from or charged upon any funds other than the
revenue pledged to the payment thereof; the City is not
subject to any liability thereon; no holder of any Bonds
shall ever have the right to compel any exercise by the
City of its taxing powers to pay any of ,the Bonds or the
interest or premium thereon, or to enforce payment
thereof against any property of the City except the
interests of the City in the Loan Agreement which has
been assigned to the Trustee under the Indenture; and the
Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance,
legal or equitable upon any property of the City except
the interests of the City in the Loan Agreement which has
been assigned to the Trustee under the Indenture.
8. Subject to the approval of the City Attorney and the
provisions of paragraph 12 hereof, the forms-of the Loan Agreement,
the Mortgage, the Remarketing Agreement, the Guaranty, the Bond
Purchase Agreement, the Certificate of Amendment and the Indenture
and exhibits thereto are approved in substantially the form
submitted. The Loan Agreement, Bond Purchase Agreement,
Certificate of Amendment and Indenture, in substantially the form
submitted, are directed to be executed in the name and on behalf
of the City by the Mayor and City Manager. Copies of all of the
documents necessary to the transaction herein described shall be
delivered, filed and recorded as provided herein and in said Loan
Agreement, Bond Purchase Agreement, Certificate of Amendment and
Indenture.
9. The distribution of the Preliminary Official Statement
is hereby authorized and the City hereby authorizes the use of a
final Official Statement reflecting the terms of the Bonds approved
hereby for the offer and sale of the Bonds. The City has not
participated in the preparation of the Official Statement and makes
no representations either express or implied as to the content or
adequacy thereof.
10. The City shall proceed forthwith to issue its Bonds, in
the form and upon the terms and conditions set forth in the
Indenture and at the initial annual interest rate of eight percent
(8%) subject to adjustment as provided for in the Indenture. The
aggregate principal amount of the Bonds shall be $6,735,000. The
offer of the Underwriter to purchase the Bonds at the price set
forth in the Bond Purchase Agreement is hereby accepted. The Mayor
and City Manager are authorized and directed to prepare and execute
the Bonds as prescribed in the Indenture and to deliver them to the
Trustee for authentication and delivery to the Underwriter.
11. The Mayor and City Manager and other officers of the City
are authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the
Underwriter certified copies of all proceedings and records of the
City relating to the Bonds, and such other affidavits and
certificates as may be required to show the facts relating to the
legality of the Bonds as such facts appear from the books and
records in the officers' custody and control or as otherwise known
to them; and all such certified copies, certificates and
affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall constitute
representations of the City as to the truth of all statements
contained therein.
12. The approval hereby given to the various documents
referred to above includes approval of such additional details
therein as may be necessary and appropriate and such modifications
thereof, deletions therefrom and additions thereto by the City
Attorney and the City officials authorized herein to execute said
documents prior to their execution; said City, officials are hereby
authorized to approve said changes on behalf of the City. The
execution of any instrument by the appropriate officer or officers
of the City herein authorized shall be conclusive evidence of the
approval of such documents in accordance with the terms hereof. In
the absence of the officers specifically named herein, any of the
documents authorized by this resolution to be executed may be
executed by a.person authorized to act in their absence..
13. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from
and after its passage.
Adopted: July 16, 1990
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
(SEAL)
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
CITY OF EDINA )
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk
of the City of Edina, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have
compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes with the
original thereof on file in my office, and that the same is a full,
true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the
City Council of the City of Edina duly called and held on the date
therein indicated, insofar as such minutes relate to the
authorization of the issuance of the Multifamily Mortgage Revenue
Refunding Bonds (Vernon Terrace Project) Series 1990.
WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City of Edina this
day of July, 1990.
City Clerk
(SEAL) City of Edina, Minnesota
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF
MULTIFAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS
(VERNON TERRACE PROJECT)
SERIES 1990
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council ") of the City of Edina, Minnesota
(the "City ") as follows:
1. The Council has received a request from Ohmega Building Corporation, a
Minnesota non - profit corporation (the "Company "), that the City undertake to
refinance a multifamily rental housing development as herein described pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462A and 462C, as amended (the "Act "), through
issuance by the City of its Multifamily Mortgage Revenue Refunding Bonds (Vernon
Terrace Project), Series 1990 in an aggregate principal amount of $6,735,000 (the
"Bonds "), to refund in part Multifamily Mortgage Revenue Bonds (Vernon Terrace
Project) issued by the City in the original principal amount of $12,600,000 (the
"Prior Bonds') to refund prior obligations of the City issued to finance the
acquisition, construction and installation of a 146 -unit multifamily housing
rental project .(the "Project ") together with related costs, developed on an
approximate 3.5 acre parcel of land located at 5420 Vernon Avenue in the City.
2. The Project is reserved for rental in part by persons of low and moderate,
income, with at least twenty percent (20 %) of the units held for occupancy by
families or individuals with adjusted income not in excess of eighty percent (80 %)
of the median family income estimated by the United States Department of Housing
and Urban Development for the Minneapolis /St. Paul standard metropolitan
statistical area.
3. It is proposed that, pursuant to a Loan Agreement proposed to be dated as
of July 1, 1990, between the City and the Company (the "Loan Agreement "), the City
will loan the proceeds of the Bonds to the Company in order to satisfy and refund
the Prior Bonds. The Loan Repayments (as defined in the Loan Agreement) to be
made by the Company under the Loan Agreement are fixed so as to produce revenue
sufficient (together with revenues derived from the investment of funds and
accounts relating to the Bonds) to pay the principal of, premium, if any, and
interest on the Bonds when due. It is further proposed that the City assign its
rights to the Loan Repayments and certain other rights under the Loan Agreement to
First Trust National Association, in St. Paul, Minnesota (the "Trustee ") as
security for payment of the Bonds under an Indenture of Trust proposed to be dated
July 1, 1990 (the "Indenture ").
4. Prior to the date of issuance of the Prior Bonds, the City approved and
submitted to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency ( "MHFA ") a "financing program"
for the Project as required by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, and MHFA approved
the financing program, and no new or amended financing program need be submitted
to MHFA in connection with the issuance of the Bonds.
5. Forms of the following documents have been submitted to this Council for
approval:
(a) the Loan Agreement;
-1-
(b) the Indenture;
(c) a Mortgage, Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security Agreement and
Fixture Financing Statement (the "Mortgage ") from the Company to the Trustee
proposed to be dated July 1, 1990;
(d) a Guaranty Agreement among Electrical Workers Local 292 Annuity Plan,
Electrical Workers Local 292 Pension Fund (each a "Guarantor ", or
collectively, the "Guarantors ") and the Trustee;
(e) a Bond Purchase Agreement (the "Bond Purchase Agreement ") among the
Company, the City, the Guarantors and Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc. (the
"Underwriter ");
(f) a Remarketing Agreement (the "Remarketing Agreement ") between the
Company, the Trustee and Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc. (the "Remarketing
Agent ") proposed to be dated July 1, 1990;
(g) a Certificate of Amendment between the City, the Trustee and the
Company; and
(h) Preliminary Official Statement with respect to the Bonds.
7. It is hereby found, determined and declared that:
(a) the Project described in the Loan Agreement and Indenture referred to
above constitutes a multifamily rental housing development authorized by the
Act;
(b) the purpose of the Project is and the effect has been to promote the
public welfare by providing additional decent, safe and sanitary rental
housing opportunities for low and moderate income persons within the City;
(c) the Project is located within the City limits;
(d) the refinancing of the Project, the issuance and sale of the Bonds, the
execution and delivery by the City of the Loan Agreement, the Bond Purchase
Agreement, the Certificate of Amendment and the Indenture, and the
performance of all covenants and agreements of the City contained in the Loan
Agreement, the Bond Purchase Agreement, the Certificate of Amendment and the
Indenture and of all other acts and things required under the constitution
and laws of the State of Minnesota to make the Loan Agreement, the Bond
Purchase Agreement, the Certificate of Amendment, Indenture and Bonds valid
and binding obligations of the City in accordance with their terms, are
authorized by the Act;
(e) it is desirable that the Prior Bonds be refunded and that the Bonds be
issued by the City upon the terms set forth in the Indenture;
(f) the Underwriter has determined that the Loan Repayments under the Loan
Agreement are fixed to produce revenue sufficient to provide for the prompt
payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds issued
under the Indenture when due, and the Loan Agreement and Indenture also
provide that the Company is required to pay all expenses of the operation and
-2-
maintenance of the Project, including, but without limitation, adequate
insurance thereon and insurance against all liability for injury to persons
or property arising from the operation thereof, and all taxes and special
assessments levied upon or with respect to the Project premises and payable
during the term of the Loan Agreement and Indenture;
(g) under the provisions of the Act, and as provided in the Loan Agreement
and Indenture, the Bonds are not to be payable from or charged upon any funds
other than the revenue pledged to the payment thereof; the City is not
subject to any liability thereon; no holder of any Bonds shall ever have the
right to compel any exercise by the City of its taxing powers to pay any of
the Bonds or the interest or premium thereof, or to enforce payment thereof
against any property of the City except the interests of the City in the Loan
Agreement which has been assigned to the Trustee under the Indenture; and the
Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable
upon any property of the City except the interests of the City in the Loan
Agreement which has been assigned to the Trustee under the Indenture.
8. Subject to the approval of the City Attorney and the provisions of
paragraph 12 hereof, the forms of the Loan Agreement, the Mortgage, the
Remarketing Agreement, the Guaranty, the Bond Purchase Agreement, the Certificate
of Amendment and the Indenture and exhibits thereto are approved in substantially
the form submitted. The Loan Agreement, Bond Purchase Agreement, Certificate of
Amendment and Indenture, in substantially the form submitted, are directed to be
executed in the name and on behalf of the City by the Mayor and City Manager.
Copies of all of the documents necessary to the transaction herein described shall
be delivered, filed and recorded as provided herein and in said Loan Agreement,
Bond Purchase Agreement, Certificate of Amendment and Indenture.
9. The distribution of the Preliminary Official Statement is hereby
authorized and the City hereby authorizes the use of a final Official Statement
reflecting the terms of the Bonds approved hereby for the offer and sale of the
Bonds. The City had not participated in the preparation of the Official Statement
and makes no representations either express or implied as to the content or
adequacy thereof.
10. The City shall proceed forthwith to issue its Bonds, in the form and upon
the terms and conditions set forth in the Indenture and at the initial annual
interest rate of eight percent (8%) subject to adjustment as provided for in the
Indenture. The aggregate principal amount of the Bonds shall be $6,735,000. The
offer of the Underwriter to purchase the Bonds at the price set forth in the Bond
Purchase Agreement is hereby accepted. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized
and directed to prepare and execute the Bonds as prescribed in the Indenture and
to deliver them to the Trustee for authentication and delivery to the Underwriter.
11. The Mayor and City Manager and other officers of the City are authorized
and directed to prepare and furnish to the Underwriter certified copies of all
proceedings and records of the City relating to the Bonds, and such other
affidavits and certificates as may be required to show the facts relating to the
legality of the Bonds as such facts appear from the books and records in the
officers' custody and control or as otherwise known to them; and all such
certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished,
shall constitute representations of the City as to the truth of all statements
contained therein.
12. The approval hereby given to the various documents referred to above
-3-
includes approval of such additional details therein as may be necessary and
appropriate and such modifications thereof, deletions therefrom and additions
thereto by the City Attorney and the City officials authorized herein to execute
said documents prior to their execution; said City officials are hereby authorized
to approve said changes on behalf of the City. The execution of any instrument by
the appropriate officer or officers of the City herein authorized shall be
conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents in accordance with the terms
hereof. In the absence of the officers specifically named herein, any of the
documents authorized by this resolution to be executed may be executed by a person
authorized to act in their absence.
13. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage.
Adopted: July 16;'1990
ATTEST:
City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
Mayor
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of
Edina, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and
foregoing extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in my office, and
that the same is a full, true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting
of the City Council of the City of Edina duly called and held on the date therein
indicated, insofar as such minutes relate to the authorization of the issuance of
the Multifamily Mortgage Revenue Refunding Bonds (Vernon Terrace Project) Series
1990.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City of Edina this 17th day of July, 1990.
City Clerk
City of Edina, Minnesota
-4-
RESOLUTION
RESOLVED, that the foregoing resolution is contingent upon the Company and the
Guarantors reaching a settlement with First Trust National Association for payment
of the existing.Multifamily Mortgage Revenue Bonds issued by the City for the
Vernon Terrace Project prior to rescission of the foregoing resolution by the City
Council.
Adopted: July 16, 1990
ATTEST:
City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF.EDINA )
Mayor
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of
Edina, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and
foregoing extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in my office, and
that the same is a full, true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting
of the City Council of the City of Edina duly called and held on the date therein
indicated, insofar as such minutes relate to the authorization of the issuance of
the Multifamily Mortgage Revenue Refunding Bonds (Vernon Terrace Project) Series
1990.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City of Edina this 17th day of July, 1990.
City Clerk
City of Edina, Minnesota
-5-
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
167M90
07/09/90
197700
06/29/90
197700
06/29/90
197700
07/05/90
197701
06/29/90
197702
06/29/90
197703
06/29/90
197704
06/29/90
197705
06/29/90
197706
06/29/90
197707
06/29/90
197708
06/29/90
197709
06/29/90
197710
06/29/90
197711
06/29/90
197712
07/05/90
197712
07/05/90
197712
07/05/90
197713
07/05/90
197714
07/05/90
197715
07/05/90
L�
CHECK REGISTER
07 -16 -90 PAGE 1
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
# MESSAGE
125.50
MODEL STONE CO.
HAND CURB
10- 4528 - 314 -30
88431
7098
125.50
* * * -CKS
1,631.52
BARRETT INC
T -BALL T- SHIRTS
10- 4504 - 621 -62
02121
7633
17.00
BARRETT INC
T -BALL T- SHIRTS
10- 4504 - 621 -62
02124
1,567.20
BARRETT INC
T- SHIRTS
10- 4504 - 623 -62
2123
8070
3,215.72.*
37.39
JOISSU PRODUCTS INC
CRAFT SUPPLIES
23- 4588 - 611 -61
25006
8269
37.39 *
25.00
BETH MCCOUSLIN
REFUND
10- 3500 - 000 -00
25.00 *
204.66
DANIEL SMITH
COST /GOODS SOLD
23- 4624 - 613 -61
8270
204.66 *
1,300.00
BATTCHER & AERO
REPAIR TOWER LITE
40- 4248 - 801 -80
8338
1,300.00 *
162.28
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
MLC EVENTS
10- 4204 - 140 -14
5785
162.28 *
6.42
ATUO WHSL W INC
MODULATOR
10- 4540 - 560 -56
37226
8193
6.42 *
322.00
TILLSON BUS /EQUIP
HEADER PANEL
10- 4540- 560 -56
13740
5680
322.00 *
294.64
RECREONICS CORP
RELACE STEPS
26- 4504 - 682 -68
294.64 *
158.96
TRANSPORT WHITEGMC
SHOE /CORE
10- 4540 - 560 -56
24553
9234
158.96 *
310.97
NASCO
LAB SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 482 -48
406743
8156
310.97 *
29.65
ED MACHOLDA
POOL SUPPLIES
26- 4504 - 682 -68
29.65 *
20,076.00
NSP
PARKING LOT LITES
27- 1300 - 004 -00
644.00
NSP
PARKING LOT LITES
27 -1300- 004 -00
2,191.00
NSP
STREETLIGHTS
60- 1300 - 033 -11
22,911.00 *
5.00
MN CHAPTER IAAI
FEE
10- 4204 - 440 -44
5.00 *
5.00
MN CHAPTER IAAI
FEE
10- 4204 - 440 -44
5.00 *
69.00
SUCCESS BUILDERS
REGISTRATION FEE
10- 4202 - 440 -44
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
07 -16 -90 PAGE 2
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
# MESSAGE
69.00
xxxxxx
xxx -CKS
197717
07/05/90
766.48
PAT GREER
SERVICES
30- 4201 - 781 -78
766.48 *
197718
07/05/90
600.00
ESPECIALLY FOR
RENTAL
30- 4224 - 781 -78
600.00 *
197719
07/05/90
13.21
U.S. TOY CO INC
CRAFT SUPPLIES
23- 4588 - 611 -61
487334
8273
13.21 *
197720
07/05/90
3,140.25
INDECO
POOL ENGINEERING
26- 1300 - 001 -00
3,140.25 *
197721
07/05/90
415.50
DONAGHUE DOORS INC
FLOOR REPAIR
50- 4274 - 821 -82
7002
415.50 *
197722
07/05/90
2,060.00
L E KOLLMEYER ARCH
CONSTRUCTION
60- 1300 - 020 -20
2,060.00 *
197723
07/05/90
445.00
NOBLE NURSERY RETAIL
PLANT MATERIAL
27- 4562 - 664 -66
629
8442
445.00 *
197724
07/05/90
33.77
STEVE JOHNSON
MEETING EXPENSES
10- 4202 - 280 -28
33.77 *
197725
07/05/90
45.00
HERB DECKER
LETTERING /PAINTING
10- 4620 - 560 -56
45.00 *
197726
07/09/90
91.50
HEIMARK FOODS
HOT DOGS
26- 4624 - 683 -68
7065
197726
07/05/90
73.20
HEIMARK FOODS
HOT DOGS
26- 4624 - 683 -68
3869
7065
164.70 *
197727
07/05/90
183.34
LOSS PREVENTION
SHOPPING SERVICE
50- 4201 - 860 -86
3731
8213
197727
07/05/90
631.81
LOSS PREVENTION
INVESTIGATION
50- 4201 - 860 -86
3730
8459
815.15 *
197728
07/05/90
120.00
GERALD DREVLOW
REIMBURSEMENT
10- 4156 - 510 -51
120.00 *
197729
07/05/90
25.00
MCFOA
DUES
10- 4204 - 140 -14
25.00 *
197730
07/05/90
555.00
OUTPOST HUNT /SPORTS
AMMO /GUN RANGE
29- 4572 - 722 -72
108
8010
555.00 *
197731
07/05/90
555.79
ENVIRONET INC
PRE - CLEANING
10- 4248 - 520 -52
5782
8141
555.79 *
197732
07/05/90
1,016.70
THE TYPE HOUSE
PRINTING
10- 2240 - 000 -00
34442
7856
1,016.70 *
197733
07/05/90
698.90
IMPULSE CONCEPTS INC
REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 646 -64
2724 -0
8361
fiJ
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
07 -16 -90 PAGE 3
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
698.90 *
197734
07/10/90
6,234.99
METRO ELECTRIC
CONSTRUCTION
27- 1300 - 004 -00
5487TE
8525
197734
07/05/90
411.28
METRO ELECTRIC
REPAIR FAN
40- 4248 - 801 -80
012404
8480
6,646.27 *
197735
07/05/90
3,600.00
THE PREST COMPANY
FLOW MTR /RECORDER
40- 4540 - 801 -80
1709
8233
3,600.00 *
197736
07/05/90
693.00
N LIGHTS PRO SHOP
TARGETS
29- 4648 - 722 -72
23692
2203
693.00 *
197737
07/05/90
300.00
MARY WALTER
CONSULTATION
10- 4256 - 510 -51
300.00 *
197738
07/09/90
26.00
CADY COMMUNICATION
TELEPHONE
27- 4256 - 662 -66
34499
8561
26.00 *
197739
07/09/90
90.00
PAT BENSON
CLEANING
27- 4201 - 662 -66
30591
8281
90.00 *
197740
07/09/90
325.00
WARREN ANDERSON
SIGNS
27- 4504 - 664 -66
325.00 *
197741
07/09/90
212.70
PRAIRIE ELECT CO INC
REPAIR
27- 4248 - 662 -66
18280
8562
212.70 *
197742
07/09/90
119.13
JOHN KEPRIOS
PETTY CASH
10- 4504 - 624 -62
119.13 *
197743
07/09/90
20.00
LIBBY PASTOR
REFUND
10- 3500 - 000 -00
20.00 *
197744
07/09/90
20.00
MOLLY RAMCZYK
REFUND
10- 3500 - 000 -00
20.00 *
197745
07/09/90
47.70
EW ROBBINS
SHAMPOO
10- 4620 - 560 -56
14868
8392
47.70 *
197746
07/09/90
70.00
ROEDLER & DELMONT
ADVERTISING
30- 4214 - 781 -78
8540
70.00 *
197747
07/09/90
5.10
REBEKAH WIESE
MILEAGE
40- 4208 - 803 -80
5.10 *
197748
07/09/90
218.00
MONSANTO COMPANY
HERBICIDE
27- 4564 - 664 -66
7873
218.00 *
197749
07/09/90
112.53
BAHLS MOTOR AND
ARM
10- 4540 - 560 -56
143915
8226
112.53 *
213.50 *
197751
07/09/90
232.76
GRAYBOW DANIELS CO
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 646 -64
30776
8036
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
07/09/90
07/09/90
07/09/90
07/09/90
07/09/90
07/09/90
07/09/90
07/09/90
07/09/90
07/09/90
07/09/90
.07/09/90
07/09/90
07/09/90
07/09/90
07/09/90
07/09/90
07/09/90
07/09/90
07/09/90
AMOUNT
232.76
190.00
190.00 *
100.00
100.00 *
2,605.78
652.06
3,257.84 *
549.75
549.75 *
185.50
185.50 *
156.00
156.00 *
144.00
180.00
324.00 *
81.00
30.00
111.00
192.00
192.00
504.00
504.00
1,374.00
1,374.00
337.50
337.50
360.00
360.00
420.00
420.00
270.00
270.00
382.50
382.50
540.00
540.00
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
LYNDE COMPANY
AMERICAN HEALTH
MN STATE TREASURER
MN STATE TREASURER
JOANNA FOOTE
ADRIENNE WEINBERGER
CYD WICKER
MONICA RUDQUIST
MONICA RUDQUIST
BETTY B PEDDIE
BETTY B PEDDIE
DOROTHY ODLAND
DAN MACKERMAN
MARGARET MCDOWELL
EVIE HOLMQUIST
PHYLLIS HAYWA
KRISTIN HALE
KATHY GUSTAFSON
MARGARET GUST
JEAN GRAPP
DRYOUT /FIELD
LAB BOOK
BLDG REPORT
BLDG REPORT
SERVICES
AC INSTRUCTOR
AC INSTRUCTOR
PT AC MAINT
AC INSTRUCTOR
AC INSTRUCTOR
CRAFT SUPPLIES
AC INSTRUCTOR
AC INSTRUCTOR
AC INSTRUCTOR
AC INSTRUCTOR
AC INSTRUCTOR
AC INSTRUCTOR
AC INSTRUCTOR
AC INSTRUCTOR
AC INSTRUCTOR
07 -16 -90 PAGE 4
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4563 - 642 -64 48568 8253
10- 4504 - 482 -48 9442 8259
10- 3095- 490 -49
10- 3113 - 490 -49
12- 4105 - 434 -43 6945
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4120 - 612 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4588 - 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201- 611 -61
23- 4201- 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
r
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
197769
07/09/90
450.00
PAT GEISHEKER
AC INSTRUCTOR
450.00 *
197770
07/09/90
360.00
SUSAN FRAME
AC ONSTRUCTOR
360.00 *
197771
07/09/90
127.50
BILL DIETRICHSON
AC ONSTRUCTOR
127.50 *
197772
07/09/90
354.00
TOBIE DICKER
AC ONSTRUCTOR
354.00 *
197773
07/09/90
30.00
ADREANE BRUMFIELD
AC ONSTRUCTOR
30.00
197774
07/09/90
180.00
BETSY BRYANT
AC ONSTRUCTOR
180.00 *
197775
07/09/90
626.00
MARIAN ALSTAD
AC ONSTRUCTOR
626.00 *
197776
07/09/90
110.00
US TENNIS ASSOC
DUES
110.00 *
197777
07/09/90
160.00
US TENNIS ASSOC
DUES
160.00 *
197778
07/09/90
40.00
TONY ELAVIA
REFUND
40.00 *
197779
07/09/90
20.00
NANCY KOSTELIZ
REFUND
20.00 *
197780
07/09/90
50.00
KEVIN OCONNOR
REFUND
50.00 *
197781
07/09/90
6.02
TERESA WALDMAN
REFUND
6.02 *
197782
07/09/90
152.04
SPORTS TECH INC
RESCUE TUBES
152.04 *
197783
07/09/90
41.00
BILLY BOY JUICE INC
MIX
41.00 *
197784
07/09/90
79.00
IDELLE PETERSON
PRO SERVICES
79.00 *
197785
07/09/90
450.00
FRONT END DATA SER
SERVICE CONTRACT
197785
07/09/90
900.00
FRONT END DATA SER
SERVICE CONTRACT
197785
07/09/90
675.00
FRONT END DATA SER
SERVICE CONTRACT
2,025.00 *
197786
07/09/90
20.00
JOHN HARDEN
REFUND
07 -16 -90 PAGE
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201- 611 -61
23- 4201- 611 -61
23 -4201- 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
10- 4504 - 627 -62
10- 4504 - 627 -62
10- 3500 - 000 -00
10- 3500 - 000 -00
10- 3500 - 000 -00
10- 3500 - 000 -00
26- 4642- 681 -68
50- 4632 - 862 -86
30- 4201 - 782 -78 20494 8575
50- 4233 - 820 -82
50- 4233 - 840 -84
50- 4233 - 860 -86
10- 3500 - 000 -00
5
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
197787
07/09/90
197788
07/09/90
197789
07/09/90
197790
07/09/90
197791
07/09/90
197792
07/09/90
197793
07/09/90
197793
07/09/90
197793
07/09/90
197794
07/10/90
197795
07/10/90
197796
07/10/90
197797
07/10/90
197798
07/10/90
197799
07/10/90
197800
07/10/90
197801
07/10/90
197802
07/10/90
197803
07/10/90
197804
07/10/90
AMOUNT
20.00 *
20.00
20.00 *
25.00
25.00 *
25.00
25.00 *
72.00
72.00 *
50.00
50.00 *
1,078.00
1,078.00 *
120.00
120.00
120.00
360.00 *
99.95
99.95 *
703.00
703.00 *
240.00
240.00 *
175.50
175.50 *
128.00
128.00 *
72.00
72.00 *
8,492.00
8,492.00 *
308.59
308.59 *
127,221.08
127,221.08 *
55,098.10
55,098.10 *
22,212.31
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
SUSAN MEWBORN
ALLISON PELACH
WM GOUGH
DELI DOUBLE
LESLIE HABERKORN
GOLF CARTS LTD
MN MUNICIPAL
MN MUNICIPAL
MN MUNICIPAL
WIDE WORLD OF GOLF
1991 US OPEN
BRAEMAR MONDAY
METRO APPLIANCE SER
THERMEX CORP
HOBART CORP
ALL AMERICAN MECH
KRAFT FOOD SERV
DAVE PERKINS
RICHMAR CONSTRUCTIOi
VICTOR CARLSON
REFUND
REFUND
REFUND
DINNER
REFUND
RENTAL
DUES
DUES
DUES
VIDEOS
TICKETS
HANDICAPS
REPAIRS
REPAIRS
REPAIRS
POOL FILTRATION
FOOD
PAYMENT
PAYMENT
PAYMENT
07 -16 -90 PAGE 6
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 3500 - 000 -00
10- 3500 - 000 -00
10- 3500 - 000 -00
10- 3500 - 000 -00
10- 3500 - 000 -00
27- 4276 - 665 -66 8547
50- 4204 - 820 -82
50- 4204 - 840 -84
50- 4204 - 860 -86
27- 2237 - 000 -00
27- 4204 - 661 -66
27- 3470 - 661 -66
27- 4248 - 663 -66 29843 8579
27- 4248 - 663 -66 24795 8580
27- 4248 - 663 -66 8578
26- 1300 7001 -00 90331 8527
27- 4624 - 663 -66 413037 8069
60- 2040 - 000 -00 90 -6
60- 2040 - 000 -00 90 -1
60- 2040 - 000 -00 89 *15
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
22,212.31 *
197805
07/10/90
7,455.81
7,455.81 *
197806
07/10/90
1,483.35
1,483.35 *
197807
07/10/90
13,448.60
13,448.60 *
197809
07/10/90
82.50
82.50 *
197810
07/10/90
42.70
42.70 *
197811
07/10/90
30.10
30.10 *
197812
07/10/90
38.50
38.50 *
197813
07/10/90
81.20
81.20 *
197814
07/10/90
29.40
29.40
197815
07/10/90
57.05
57.05
197816
07/10/90
35.31
35.31
197817
07/10/90
208.16
197817
07/10/90
84.99
293.15
197818
07/10/90
100.00
100.00
197819
07/10/90
25.00
25.00
197820
07/10/90
25.00
25.00
197821
07/10/90
25.00
25.00 *
197822
07/10/90
25.00
25.00 *
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP PAYMENT
GL CONTRACTING INC PAYMENT
BURY &CARLSON INC PAYMENT
MAUREEN BROCKWAY
TOBIE DICKER
RICK GRAVROCK
BARB LUNDGREN
SHARON MCKISSON
MONICA RUDQUIST
DORIS WOLTER
ANN WIDERSTROM
MOLLIE PAULSON
MOLLIE PAULSON
BACHMANS
AGNES FINE
PAT MENEELY
MARGARET GUST
PHYLLIS HAYWA
ART WORK SOLD
ART WORK SOLD
ART WORK SOLD
ART WORK SOLD
ART WORK SOLD
ART WORK SOLD
ART WORK SOLD
ART WORK SOLD
ART WORK SOLD
PERSONNEL SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
07 -16 -90 PAGE 7
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
60- 2040 - 000 -00 89 -11
60- 2040 - 000 -00 89 -10
60- 2040 - 000 -00 89 -7
23- 3625 - 000 -00,
23- 3625 - 000 -00
23- 3625 - 000 -00
23- 3625- 000 -00
23- 3625 - 000 -00
23- 3625 - 000 -00
23- 3625 - 000 -00
23- 3625 - 000 -00
23- 3625 - 000 -00
23- 4120 - 613 -61
30- 4201 - 781 -78
30- 4201 - 781 -78
30- 4201 - 781 -78
30- 4201 - 781 -78
30- 4201- 781 -78
* * * -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
197823
07/10/90
50.00
BOB CONNOLLY
SERVICES
50.00
*
197824
07/10/90
25.00
AGNES FINE
SERVICES
25.00
*
197825
07/10/90
25.00
BILL DIETRICHSON
SERVICES
25.00
*
197826
,07/10/90
25.00
MARGARET GUST
SERVICES
25.00
*
197827
07/10/90
25.00
MARIAN ALSTAD
SERVICES
25.00
*
197828
07/10/90
25.00
PHULLIS HAYWA
SERVICES
25.00
*
197829
07/10/90
25.00
BOB CONNOLLY
SERVICES
25.00
*
197830
07/10/90
25.00
AGNES FINE
SERVICES
25.00
*
197831
07/10/90
25.00
PHYLLIS HAYWA
SERVICES
25.00
*
197832
07/10/90
25.00
MARIAN ALSTAD
SERVICES
25.00
*
197833
07/10/90
25.00
JANE RIFFEY
SERVICES
25.00
*
197834
07/10/90
25.00
BILL DIETRICHSON
SERVICES
25.00
*
* * * * **
197836
07/10/90.
64,215.94
PROGRESSIVE
PAYMENT
64,215.94
*
197837
07/10/90
27.50
FAST 1 HR PHOTO
ADVERTISING
27.50
*
197838
07/10/90
23,996.27
ALBER CONSTRUCTION
PAYMENT
23,996.27
*
197839
07/10/90
11,472.41.
LAYNE MINNESOTA
PAYMENT
11,472.41
*
197840
07/10/90
5,907.62
ORR CONSTRUCTION
PAYMENT
5,907.62
*
197841
07/10/90
308.00
LIA NICKLOW
PRO SERVICES
07 -16 -90 PAGE
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
30- 4201 - 781 -78
30- 4201- 781 -78
30- 4201 - 781 -78
30- 4201 - 781 -78
30- 4201 - 781 -78
30- 4201 - 781 -78
30- 4201 - 781 -78
30- 4201- 781 -78
30- 4201 - 781 -78
30- 4201 - 781 -78
30- 4201 - 781 -78
30'4201- 781 -78
60- 2040 - 000 -00
23- 4214 - 611 -61
60- 2040 - 000 -00
60- 2040 - 000 -00
60- 2040 - 000 -00
23- 4201 - 611 -61
89 -13
23772 8091
90 -5
90 -3
90 -2
* * * -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
07 -16 -90 PAGE
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
308.00 *
197842
07/10/90
475.45
PERKINS LANDSCAPE
REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 643 -64
8561
475.45 *
197843
07/10/90
100.00
PAT GREER
EXHIBT FEE
30- 3501 - 000 -00
100.00 *
197844
07/10/90
84.00
DOUGLAS BAGLEY
REFUND
10- 4202 - 440 -44
84.00 *
197845
07/10/90
83.94
THEODORE PAULFRANZ
REFUND
10- 4504 - 440 -44
83.94 *
197846
07/10/90
280.15
NELVINS AUTO BODY
REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
2333 7005
280.15 *
197847
07/10/90
2,700.00
ARTEKA
CONSTRUCTION
60- 1300 - 287 -04
7481A 8529
197847
07/10/90
1,900.00
ARTEKA
CONSTRUCTION
60- 1300 - 287 -04
7418B 8530
4,600.00 *
197848
07/10/90
4,800.00
METRO SALES INC
COPIER
27- 1300 - 000 -00
274299 8455
4,800.00 *
197849
07/10/90
41.34
TERRY KEHOE
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 440 -44
41.34 *
197850
07/10/90
10,907.62
MILLS ADVERTISING
PRINTING
12- 4600 - 434 -43
8583
10,907.62 *
197851
07/10/90
78.00
JANE GOODRICH
CLASS CANCELLED
23- 3500 - 000 -00
78.00 *
197852
07/10/90
'29.00
DONNA GOSEWISCH
CLASS CANCELLED
23- 3500 - 000 -00
29.00 *
197853
07/10/90
44.00
CASANDRA MIHALCHICK
CLASS CANCELLED
23- 3500 - 000 -00
44.00 *
197854
07/10/90
74.00
ANN FENLASON
CLASS CANCELLED
23- 3500 - 000 -00
74.00 *
197855
07/10/90
63.00
JUDY BRACCI
CLASS CANCELLED
23- 3500 - 000 -00
63.00 *
197856
07/10/90
31.00
JOAN BORMANN
CLASS CANCELLED
23- 3500 - 000 -00
31.00 *
197857
07/10/90
24.00
ANGELINE BARTLETT
CLASS CANCELLED
23- 3500 - 000 -00
24.00 *
197858
07/10/90
58.00
PHYLLIS SANDO
CLASS CANCELLED
23- 3500 - 000 -00
58.00 *
197859
07/10/90
24.00
CAROL MOORE
CLASS CANCELLED
23- 3500 - 000 -00
9
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
197860
07/10/90
197861
07/10/90
* * * * **
27.00
197A01
06/29/90
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
197A07
07/10/90
197A09
07/05/90
197A09
07/10/90
* * * * **
197A15
07/09/90
* * * * **
197A39
06/29/90
197A39
06/29/90
197A39
07/09/90
197A39
06/29/90
197A39
07/09/90
197A39
06/29/90
197A39
06/29/90
* * * * **
REBUILD
197A41
07/09/90
197A41
07/10/90
197A41
07/09/90
* * * * **
BATTERY
197A49
07/09/90
197A49
07/09/90
197A49
07/09/90
197A49
07/09/90
197A49
07/09/90
197A49
07/09/90
07 -16 -90 PAGE 10
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P•.0. # MESSAGE
23- 3500- 000 -00
60- 1300 - 286 -04 8532
10- 4504 - 335 -30 8024
50- 4632 - 822 -82
1,034.60 AAA VEHICLE REGISTRATION 10- 4310 - 560 -56
34.00 AAA TAB RENEWALS 10- 4310 - 560 -56
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1,068.60 *
CHECK REGISTER
MEAT
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
24.00 *
27- 4624- 663 -66
196.72
27.00
PODI STOCKBERGER
CLASS CANCELLED
27.00 *
* ** -CKS
33.50
4,023.36
BJORKS COUNTRY STORE
CONSTRUCTION
4,023.36 *
10- 4262 - 440 -44
9.90
493.00
3M CO
CONE SHEETING
493.00 *
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
55.20
ALL -AMER BOTTLING
MIX
55.20 *
27- 4262 - 663 -66
144.13
07 -16 -90 PAGE 10
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P•.0. # MESSAGE
23- 3500- 000 -00
60- 1300 - 286 -04 8532
10- 4504 - 335 -30 8024
50- 4632 - 822 -82
1,034.60 AAA VEHICLE REGISTRATION 10- 4310 - 560 -56
34.00 AAA TAB RENEWALS 10- 4310 - 560 -56
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1,068.60 *
AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE
MEAT
27- 4624 - 663 -66
338.11
AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE
MEAT
27- 4624- 663 -66
196.72
AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE
MEAT
27- 4624- 663 -66
962.62
* ** -CKS
33.50
ADAMS PEST
CONTROL
INSECT CONTROL
26- 4201 - 682 -68
10- 4262 - 440 -44
9.90
33.50 *
LAUNDRY
10- 4262 - 482 -48
112.81
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
10- 4262 - 520 -52
103.33
AMERICAN LINEN
LINEN
27- 4262 - 663 -66
144.13
AMERICAN LINEN
* ** -CKS
182.40
ALTERNATOR
REBUILD
BATTERY
10- 4504 - 260 -26
7036
8223
59.04
ALTERNATOR
REBUILD
BATTERY
10- 4504 - 301 -30
7032
8032
416.78
ALTERNATOR
REBUILD
TOOLS
10- 4580 - 560 -56
7040
8353
40.61
ALTERNATOR
REBUILD
EAR PLUGS
10- 4642 - 301 -30
7033
7968
5.40
ALTERNATOR
REBUILD
RESPIRATOR CARTRIDGE
10- 4642 - 301 -30
7039
7968
192.90
ALTERNATOR
REBUILD
FLAG /VEST
10- 4642 - 560 -56
7035
8194
226.07
ALTERNATOR
REBUILD
TOOLS
40- 4580 - 801 -80
7037
8236
1,123.20 *
427.79
AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE
MEAT
27- 4624 - 663 -66
338.11
AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE
MEAT
27- 4624- 663 -66
196.72
AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE
MEAT
27- 4624- 663 -66
962.62
181.56
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
10- 4262 - 440 -44
9.90
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
10- 4262 - 482 -48
112.81
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
10- 4262 - 520 -52
103.33
AMERICAN LINEN
LINEN
27- 4262 - 663 -66
144.13
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
30- 4262 - 782 -78
56.74
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
50- 4262 - 821 -82
* ** -CKS
5506
5506
5506
5515
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
10- 4560- 644 -64
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
197A49
07/09/90
66.19
197A49
07/09/90
54.63
BACHMANS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
729.29 *
* * * * **
BACHMANS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
197A51
06/29/90
65.10
197A51
07/10/90
70.00
BARR ENGINEERING
CONSTRUCTION
135.10 *
* * * * **
BFI RECYCLING SYS
RECYCLING
197A54
07/09/90
35.00
197A54
07/09/90
35.00
197A54
07/09/90
35.00
25676 7944
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
105.00
* * * * **
25673 7944
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
197A67
06/29/90
110.46
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
110.46
* * * * **
197A80
06/29/90
200.00
* * * * **
200.00
197606
07/09/90
91.67
197806
07/09/90
94.27
197606
07/09/90
82.38
197606
07/09/90
91.80
197806
07/09/90
253.80
197806
07/10/90
149.85
*
763.77 *
* * * **
197613
07/10/90
3,556.68
3,556.68 *
197B17
07/09/90
120.00
197817
07/09/90
33,348.15
-
33,468.15
197618
06/29/90
73.16
197818
06/29/90
302.44
197818
06/29/90
168.66-
197818
06/29/90
337.31
544.25
* * * * **
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY
AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY
AMERICAN RED CROSS
AMERICAN RED CROSS
AAGARD
AAGARD
AAGARD
AQUA ENGINEERING
ASTLEFORD INTL
LIFESAVING BOOKS
LIFESAVING BOOKS
RECYCLING
RECYCLING
RECYCLING
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SLACK ADJUSTERS
07 -16 -90 PAGE 11
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
50- 4262 - 841 -84
50- 4262 - 841 -84
10- 4504 - 625 -62 07169
10- 4504 - 625 -62
50- 4250 - 821 -82
50- 4250 - 841 -84
50- 4250 - 861 -86
10- 4504 - 318 -30 25536 8416
10- 4540 - 560 -56 65118 8241
BACHMANS
SHRUBS /POOL
10- 4560- 644 -64
8239
BACHMANS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 664 -66
BACHMANS
PLANTS
27- 4560 - 664 -66
8543
BACHMANS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
40- 4504- 803 -80
BACHMANS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
60- 1300 - 044 -08
BACHMANS
CONSTRUCTION
60- 1300 - 286 -04
BARR ENGINEERING
CONSTRUCTION
27- 1300 - 003 -00
BFI RECYCLING SYS
RECYCLING
10- 4226 - 507 -50
BFI RECYCLING SYS
RECYCLING
10- 4226 - 507 -50
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
BRAKE CLEANER
10- 4504 - 560 -56
25676 7944
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
25673 7944
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
CREDIT
10- 4540 - 560 -56
27799
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
24276 7896
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
197822
07/09/90
197B22
07/09/90
197B22
07/09/90
197B22
07/09/90
* * * * **
2,327.89
197B25
06/29/90
* * * * **
197627
07/05/90
197B27
07/05/90
197B27
07/05/90
197830
06/29/90
197630
06/29/90
197630
06/29/90
197B30
06/29/90
* * * * **
50- 4630 - 862 -86
197B42
07/09/90
197857
07/09/90
197B59
06/29/90
197B59
06/29/90
197859
06/29/90
197859
06/29/90
197659
06/29/90
197859
06/29/90
197B59
06/29/90
19785.9
06/29/90
197B59
06/29/90
197B59
06/29/90
197B59
06/29/90
197859
06/29/90
197859
06/29/90
197659
06/29/90
197859
06/29/90
0
CHECK REGISTER
07 -16 -90 PAGE 12
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
2,327.89
BEER WHOLESALERS
BEER
27- 4630 - 663 -66
5505
716.35
BEER WHOLESALERS
BEER
50- 4630 - 822 -82
2,431.80
BEER WHOLESALERS
BEER
50- 4630 - 842 -84
_
1,563.05
BEER WHOLESALERS
BEER
50- 4630 - 862 -86
7,039.09
* ** -CKS
100.00
BENNETT -WAYNE
POLICE SERVICES
10- 4100 - 430 -42
100.00
* ** -CKS
139.30
BERGFORD TRUCKING
LIQUOIR DELIVERY
50- 4626 - 822 -82
296.00
BERGFORD TRUCKING
LIQUOIR DELIVERY
50- 4626 - 842 -84
276.50
BERGFORD TRUCKING
LIQUOIR DELIVERY
50- 4626 - 862 -86
711.80
* ** -CKS
43.92
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
FRAMES /FANS
10- 4504 - 420 -42
580176
28.65
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
PENS
10- 4504 - 440 -44
580176
32.11
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
LEGAL PAD
10- 4504 - 510 -51
580177
44.54
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
MARKERS
10- 4504 - 540 -54
576622 8046
149.22 *
* ** -CKS
38.96
BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY
OFFCIE SUPPLIES
30- 4516 - 781 -78
162891 8542
38.96 *
* ** -CKS
175.00
BROADCAST MUSIC INC
DUES
30- 4202 - 781 -78
175.00
* ** -CKS
626.79
BFI OF MN INC
GARBAGE
10- 4250 - 301 -30
156.70
BFI OF MN INC
GARBAGE
10- 4250 - 440 -44
156.70
BFI OF.MN INC
GARBAGE
10- 4250 - 520 -52
626.78
BFI OF MN INC
GARBAGE
10- 4250 - 540 -54
104.46
BFI OF MN INC
GARBAGE
10- 4250 - 645 -64
151.73
BFI OF MN INC
GARBAGE
10- 4250 - 645 -64
417.85
BFI OF MN INC
GARBAGE
10- 4250 - 645 -64
64.96
BFI OF MN INC
GARBAGE
23- 4250 - 612 -61
156.70
BFI OF MN INC
GARBAGE
26- 4250 - 682 -68
495.53
IBFI OF MN INC
GARBAGE
27- 4250 - 662 -66
104.46
BFI OF MN INC
GARBAGE
27- 4250 - 664 -66
313.39
BFI OF MN INC
GARBAGE
28- 4250 - 702 -70
1,253.57
BFI OF MN INC
GARBAGE
30- 4250 - 782 -78
26.12
BFI OF MN INC
GARBAGE
50- 4250 - 841 -84
26.12
BFI OF MN INC
GARBAGE
50- 4250 - 861 -86
4,681.86 *
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
07 -16 -90
PAGE 13
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
#
MESSAGE
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
197862
06/29/90
382.82
BOYUM EQUIPMENT
WHEEL
10- 4540 - 560 -56
5334
7123
382.82
* * * * **
*** -CKS
197879
07/09/90
187.65
BROCK WHITE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 314 -30
8251
197B79
06/29/90
294.00
BROCK WHITE
FENCE
60- 1300 - 289 -04
7934
481.65 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
197B81
07/10/90
4,636.19
BRW INC.
PRO SERVICE
60- 1300 - 290 -04
58526
4,636.19 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
197C01
06/29/90
50.40
C & S DISTRIBUTING
CRAFT SUPPLIES
23- 4588 - 611 -61
107059
8087
197C01
07/05/90
81.87
C & S DISTRIBUTING
COST /GOODS SOLD
23- 4624- 613 -61
107335
8093
197C01
06/29/90
132.84
C & S DISTRIBUTING
COST /GOOD SOLD
23- 4624- 613 -61
107059
8087
265.11 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
197C23
07/09/90
60.00
CORE RESTORE
CORE
27- 4516- 661 -66
7818
8520
60.00 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
197C30
07/10/90
95.40
CITY BEER
BEER
50- 4630 - 822 -82
197C30
07/09/90
113.60
CITY BEER
BEER
50- 4630 - 842 -84
197C30
07/10/90
55.00
CITY BEER
BEER
50- 4630 - 862 -86
264.00 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
197C32
07/05/90
110.16
FRAN CALLAHAN
JUNE MILEAGE
10- 4208 - 480 -48
110.16 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
197C34
07/05/90
12,093.76
CITY OF RICHFIELD
SERVICES
10- 4201 - 600 -60
1536
197C34
07/09/90
225.03
CITY OF RICHFIELD
LIGHT /POWER
41- 4252 - 900 -90
1538
12,318.79
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
197C36
07/10/90
12.25
CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV
WINDOW CLEANING
50- 4248 - 821 -82
197C36
07/10/90
12.25
CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV
WINDOW CLEANING
50- 4248- 841 -84
197C36
07/10/90
12.25
CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV
WINDOW CLEANING
50- 4248 - 861 -86
36.75
197C37
07/09/90
8.78
CLANCY DRUG INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 = 260 -26
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
10- 4580- 301 -30
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
* k k k k k
8.78
197C44
07/09/90
709.89
COCA COLA BOTTLING
COKE
197C44
07/09/90
668.50
COCA COLA BOTTLING
COKE
197C44
07/10/90
224.75
COCA COLA BOTTLING
MIX
197C44
07/09/90
916.72
COCA COLA BOTTLING
MIX
197C44
07/10/90
1,301.26
COCA COLA BOTTLING
MIX
k k k k k k
3,821.12 *
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 482 -48
197C51
07/10/90
878.40
COMM OF REVENUE
FUEL TAX
8175
878.40 *
197C52
07/10/90
60.00
COMM OF TRAN
MANUAL UPDATES
197C52
07/10/90
5.00
COMM OF TRAN
MANUAL UPDATES
197C52
07/09/90
30.00
COMM OF TRAN
MANUAL UPDATE
k kk
95.00 *
197C54
06/29/90
320.52
CONVEYORS
CONV BELT
k k k k k k
320.52
197C60
07/09/90
- 62.37
CONSTR FASTENING SYS
TOOLS
197C60
07/09/90
219.00
CONSTR FASTENING SYS
RAMSET DYNADRILL
281.37
k k k k k k
197C64
07/09/90
30.91
SYSCO MINNESOTA
WINE CARAFES
197C64
07/09/90
497.04
SYSCO MINNESOTA
SUPPLIES
197C64
07/09/90
318.73
SYSCO MINNESOTA
CLEANING SUPPLYS
197C64
07/09/90
2,649.06
SYSCO MINNESOTA
FOOD
3,495.74
k* k k k k
197C78
06/29/90
83.32
CRESCENT ELECTRIC
CONDUIT
83.32
k k k* k k
197C87
06/29/90
336.07Y&rT.
CURTIN MATHESON SCI
LAB SUPPLIES
197C87
07/09/90
_ 175.93
CURTIN MATHESON SCI
LAB SUPPLIES
k k k k k k
512.06.4-1--*
197C89
07/05/90
102.40
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
PARTS
197C89
07/05/90
14.10
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
REPAIR PARTS
07 -16 -90 PAGE 14
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
26- 4624 - 683 -68 7201
27- 4524 - 663 -66 5507
50- 4632 - 822 -82
50- 4632 - 842 -84
50- 4632- 862 -86
* ** -CKS
10- 4612 - 560 -56
10 -4204- 260 -26 85652
10- 4204 - 260 -26 85161
10- 4504 - 325 -30 86043 8429
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56 2393 2524
* ** -CKS
10- 4580- 301 -30
14012
8237
10- 4580 - 301 -30
14019
8242
* ** -CKS
27- 4504- 662 -66
27- 4504 - 663 -66
27- 4512 - 663 -66
27- 4624 - 663 -66
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 322 -30
55816
8217
.
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 482 -48
8155
10- 4504 - 482 -48
8175
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 642 -64
44131
8295
27 =4540- 664 -66
44130
9106
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
197C89
07/05/90
7.19
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
REPAIR PARTS
123.69
197C99
07/10/90
735.00
C &W TURF
SOD
735.00
*
k k k k k k
197D05
07/10/90
49.50
D. C. ANNIS SEWER
REPAIRS
49.50
*
k k k k k k
197D07
06/29/90
31.45
D.C. HEY CO.
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
31.45
*
k k k k k k
197D19
06/29/90
44.50
DANS REGISTER SERV.
REPAIRS /REGISTER
44.50
*
kkkkkk
197D24
07/05/90
8.00
DIANE SANKEY
LICENSE
197D24
07/05/90
40.00
DIANE SANKEY
LICENSE
197D24
07/05/90
2.00
DIANE SANKEY
LATE FEE
197D24
07/05/90
•1.16
DIANE SANKEY
COFFEE FILTERS
197D24
07/05/90
3.00
DIANE SANKEY
ELECTR PARTS
54.16
*
k k k k k k
197027
07/10/90
321.16
DAVE S FOOD WAGON
MILK
321.16
*
k k k k k k
197D29
07/09/90
276.20
DAVIDSEN DIST. INC.
BEER
276.20
kkkkkk
197D43
07/05/90
2,876.96
DELANO ERICKSON ARCH
CONSTRUCTION
2,876.96
k k k k k k
197D47
07/10/90
59.60
DEPENDABLE COURIER
COURIER SERVICE
59.60
k k k k k k
197D61
06/29/90
100.00
DICK NISSEN
POLICE SERVICES
07 -16 -90 PAGE 15
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
27- 4540 - 664 -66 44025 8106
* ** -CKS
27- 4562 - 664 -66 2934 8516
* ** -CKS
10- 4248 - 440 -44 3728 8115
* ** -CKS
23- 4248 - 612 -61 175919 7889
* ** -CKS
26- 4201 - 683 -68
* ** -CKS
10- 4202 - 281 -28
10- 4202 - 281 -28
10- 4310 - 560 -56
10- 4504 - 540 -54
40- 4540 - 801 -80
* ** -CKS
27- 4624 - 663 -66 5508
* ** -CKS
50- 4630 - 842 -84
60- 1300 - 021 -20
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
10- 4216- 160 -16 157597
* ** -CKS
10- 4100 - 430 -42
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
07 -16 -90
PAGE 16
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
#
MESSAGE
100.00
*
kkkkk*
kkk -CKS
197D70
07/05/90
166.25
DPC INDUSTRIES
POOL CHEMICALS
26- 4564 - 682 -68
780996
166.25
*
kkk * k k
* ** -CKS
197D86
07/10/90
153.88
DENNYS 5th AV BAKE
ROLLS
27- 4624 - 663 -66
8067
153.88
kkkkk k
* ** -CKS
197E14
06/29/90
21.10
EARL F. ANDERSON
SIGNS
10- 4504 - 301 -30
97419
8415
197E14
06/29/90
487.50
EARL F. ANDERSON
CAPS /CROSSPIECE
10- 4542 - 325 -30
97341
8417
508.60
kkkkk k
* ** -CKS
197E17
07/09/90
4,955.65
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
BEER
50- 4630 - 822 -82
197E17
07/09/90
8,989.20
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
BEER
50- 4630 - 842 -84
197E17
07/09/90
10,872.35
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
BEER
50- 4630 - 862 -86
24,817.20
kkkkk k
* ** -CKS
197E33
07/05/90
28.00
EDINA CHAM OF COM
JULY CHAMBER MTG
10- 4206 - 140 -14
28.00
* k k k k k
* ** -CKS
197E51
07/10/90
188.00
EGGHEAD SOFTWARE
RAPID FILE
10- 4901 - 140 -14
8449
188.00
kkkkk k
* ** -CKS
197E71
06/29/90
59.80
ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY
GLOVES /GOGGLES
26- 4642 - 681 -68
197E71
07/09/90
55.95
ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY
SAFETY GLASSES
40- 4642 - 801 -80
7879
115.75
kkkkk k
* ** -CKS
197E94
07/05/90
330.00
ESS BROS & SONS
SEER GRATES
41- 4552- 900 -90
2094
8430
330.00
*
k k k k k k
* ** -CKS
197F02
06/29/90
354.27
FACILITY SYSTEMS
RECEPTACLES
25- 4924 - 520 -52
48818
8463
354.27
*
kkkkk k
* ** -CKS
197F11
06/29/90
202.20
FEED RITE CONTROL
CHEMICALS
26- 4248 - 682 -68
141513
197F11
06/29/90
191.70
FEED RITE CONTROL
CHEMICALS
26- 4248 - 682 -68
141514
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
197F11
06/29/90
137.50
FEED RITE CONTROL
CHEMICALS
531.40
* * * * **
197F19
07/10/90
50,000.00
FIRST TRUST
BOND PRINCIPAL
197F19
07/10/90
303,918.75
FIRST TRUST
BOND INTEREST
197F19
07/10/90
244,087.50
FIRST TRUST
BOND INTEREST
197F19
07/10/90
363506.25
FIRST TRUST
BOND INTEREST
197F19
07/10/90
64,262.50
FIRST TRUST
BOND INTEREST
197F19
07/10/90
134,475.00
FIRST TRUST
BOND INTEREST
197F19
07/10/90
50,000.00
FIRST TRUST
BOND PRINCIPAL
197F19
07/10/90
269,281.25
FIRST TRUST
BOND INTEREST
197F19
07/10/90
32,103.33
FIRST TRUST
BOND INTEREST
197F19
07/10/90
64,206.67
FIRST TRUST
BOND INTEREST
1'97F19
07/10/90
52,500.00
FIRST TRUST
BOND INTEREST
197F19
07/10/90
60,705.00
FIRST TRUST
BOND INTEREST
197F19
07/10/90
250,000.00
FIRST TRUST
BOND PRINCIPAL
* * * * **
1,939,046.25
197F47
06/29/90
219.82
FOWLER ELECTRIC
ELECT EQUIP
197F47
07/09/90
29.50
FOWLER ELECTRIC
REPAIR PARTS
197F47
07/09/90
98.40
FOWLER ELECTRIC
SUPPLIES
347.72 *
* * * * **
197F67
06/29/90
213.50
FREEWAY DODGE INC.
SERVICE
213.50 *
* * * * **
197G02
07/09/90
360.00
LIZ GEREBI
SERVICES
360.00 *
* * * * **
197G15
07/10/90
37.00
GEM TAP SERV
BEER LINES
* * * * **
37.00 *
197G24
07/09/90
400.00
GEN. COMMUNICATIONS
GE MOBILE /USED
197G24
07/09/90
286.25
GEN. COMMUNICATIONS
MAINT CONTRACT
197G24
07/09/90
400.00
GEN. COMMUNICATIONS
GE MOBILE /USED
197G24
06/29/90
94.50
GEN. COMMUNICATIONS
REPAIR RADIO
1,180.75 *
* * * * **
197G30
07/09/90
35.85
GENERAL SPORTS
T -BALL UNIFORMS
35.85 *
* * * * **
07 -16 -90 PAGE 17
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
26- 4248 - 682 -68 141490
10- 1145 - 000 -00
10- 1145 - 000 -00
10- 1145 - 000 -00
10- 1145 - 000 -00
10- 1145 - 000 -00
10 -1145- 000 -00
10- 1145- 000 -00
10- 1145 - 000 -00
40- 4300 - 800 -80
41- 4300 - 900 -90
66- 4300 - 000 -00
66- 4300 - 000 -00
66- 4302 - 000 -00
10- 4540 - 560 -56 824080 8230
10- 4540 - 560 -56 84200 8244
27- 4504 - 664 -66 90620 8524
10- 4248 - 560 -56 865070 8216
30- 4201 - 781 -78
27- 4630 - 663 -66 5509
10- 4294 - 560 -56 67545 8185
10- 4294 - 560 -56 33846 8426
10- 4294 - 560 -56 67544 8186
10- 4294 - 560 -56 67218 8418
10- 4504 - 621 -62 10079
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
* ** -CKS
CHECK.REGISTER
-
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
197G32
07/10/90
867.50
GOPHER STATE 1 CALL
CALLS
197G32
07/09/90
50.00
GOPHER STATE 1 CALL
CALLS
* * * * **
917.50 *
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 900 -90
197G38
06/29/90
100.00
GEORGE BUTLER
POLICE SERVICES
100.00 *
* * * * **
197G44
06/29/90
50.00
GLEN SIPE PIANO SERV
SERVICE CONTRACT
50.00 *
* * * * **
197G48
07/05/90
370.00
GOLF CAR MIDWEST
TOPS FOR CARS
197G48
07/05/90
185.00
GOLF CAR MIDWEST
TOPS FOR CARS
197G48
07/05/90
450.00
GOLF CAR MIDWEST
KEYS /TOPS
1,005.00 *
* * * * **
197G62
07/10/90
102.00
GRANDMA S CUPBOARD
POPCORN
102.00 *
* * * * **
197G82
07/05/90
7.30
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
LIQUOR DELIVERY
197G82
07/05/90
5.11
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
LIQUOR DELIVERY
12.41 *
* * * * **
197G86
07/10/90
23.00
GROUP HEALTH PLAN
AMBULANCE REFUND
23.00 *
197G88
07/09/90
159.95
GRUBER POWER EQUIP
REPAIR PARTS
197G88
07/09/90
165.00
GRUBER POWER EQUIP
WEED WHIP
324.95
* * * * **
197G96
06/29/90
44.10
GUY SPEAKER CO.
METERING CHARTS
44.10
* * * * **
197H02
07/09/90
22.40
H. A. HOLDEN INC.
RELAY
22.40
* * * * **
07 -16 -90 PAGE 18
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4318 - 280 -28 690176
10- 4318- 280 -28
* ** -CKS
10- 4100 - 430 -42
* ** -CKS
30- 4288 - 782 -78 900626 8446
* ** -CKS
27- 4540 - 665 -66 1839 8297
27- 4540 - 665 -66 1927 8436
27- 4540 - 665 -66 1755 8104
* ** -CKS
27- 4624 - 663 -66 5517
* ** -CKS
50- 4626- 822 -82 331459
50- 4626- 842 -84 331460
* ** -CKS
10- 3180 - 000 -00
-
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 646 -64 8829
8354
10- 4580- 646 -64 8786
8183
* ** -CKS
40- 4540 - 801 -80 35009
8191
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 900 -90
8399
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
197H09
07/09/90
87.00
MESSAGE
HALLMAN
87.00 *
* * * * **
54189
8235
197H21
07/09/90
182.68
182.68 *
197H22
06/29/90
100.00
10- 4248 - 560 -56
100.00 *
* * * * **
HAROLD SWANSON
POLICE SERVICES
197H28
06/29/90
450.00
197H28
07/09/90
245.86
197H28
06/29/90
450.00
* ** -CKS
HAYDEN- MURPHY EQUIP
1,145.86 *
* * * * **
34
197H36
07/10/90
403.79.
40- 4540 - 803 -80
36097
403.79 *
* * * * **
HAYDEN- MURPHY EQUIP
HOSE
197H63
06/29/90
528.00
528.00 *
* * * * **
197H65
06/29/90
100.00
10- 4510 - 440 -44
847
100.00 *
* * * * **
197I23
07/09/90
14.17
14.17 *
* * * * **
HOFFERS INC
FIELD POINT
197I59
06/29/90
1,818.70
1,818.70 *
197J23
07/09/90
129.00
10- 4100 - 430 -42
129.00 *
* * * * **
197J27
07/10/90
26.30
197J27
07/05/90
28.33
197J27
06/29190
25.70
80.33
CHECK REGISTER
07 -16 -90
PAGE 19
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
#
MESSAGE
HALLMAN
TURBO T -100
40- 4540 - 803 -80
54189
8235
* ** -CKS
HARMON GLASS
WINDSHIELD
10- 4248 - 560 -56
8232
HAROLD SWANSON
POLICE SERVICES
10- 4100 - 430 -42
* ** -CKS
HAYDEN- MURPHY EQUIP
HOSE ASSY
10- 4540 - 803 -80
34
HAYDEN- MURPHY EQUIP
SUCTION HOSE
40- 4540 - 803 -80
36097
8318
HAYDEN- MURPHY EQUIP
HOSE
40- 4580 - 801 -80
35144
7762
* ** -CKS
HENN CTY MED CENTER
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
10- 4510 - 440 -44
847
8118
* ** -CKS
HOFFERS INC
FIELD POINT
10- 4563 - 642 -64
414362
8192
* ** -CKS
HOFFMAN- WILLIAM
POLICE SERVICES
10- 4100 - 430 -42
* ** -CKS
INDELCO CORP
REPAIR PARTS /POOL
10- 4540 - 646 -64
52478
8320
* ** -CKS
INTERIOR COM SYS.
PHONE LINES
10- 4256 - 510 -51
27500
8453
* ** -CKS
JR JOHNSON SUP
TREES /FLOWERS /SHRUBS
30- 4560 - 782 -78
74773
8538
* ** -CKS
JERRYS FOODS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
23- 4504 - 611 -61
JERRYS FOODS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
23- 4504 - 611 -61
JERRYS FOODS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
23- 4504 - 611 -61
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
k k* k k k
197J35
07/05/90
22.50
JERRYS PRINTING
ORDINANCE PAPER
197J35
07/05/90
53.44
JERRYS PRINTING
POLLING NOTICE
197J35
07/10/90
30.00
JERRYS PRINTING
PRINTING
105.94
* * * * **
197J41
06/29/90
479.18
JIM HATCH SALES
FENCE /RAKES
k k k k k k
479.18
197J74
06/29/90
75.03
JUSTUS LUMBER
STUDS /SINKERS
197J74
07/09/90
33.52
JUSTUS LUMBER
PAINT /LUMBER
k k k k k k
108.55 *
197J99
07/10/90
40.00
JANET CANTON
MILEAGE /LOGIS
40.00 *
rk * * **
197K35
07/09/90
43.13
KNOX COMM CREDIT
PARTS
197K35
06/29/90
44.50
KNOX COMM CREDIT
PARTS
197K35
07/09/90
24.82
KNOX COMM CREDIT
CONCRETE MIX
197K35
06/29/90
109.92
KNOX COMM CREDIT
PARTS
197K35
07/09/90
25.54
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
197K35
07/09/90
72.21
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
197K35
07/09/90
19.35
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
197K35
07/10/90
130.54
KNOX COMM CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
470.01
*kk * **
197K45
07/10/90
116.70
KOKESH ATHLETIC
SUPPLIES
197K45
07/10/90
433.75
KOKESH ATHLETIC
SUPPLIES
197K45
07/10/90
111.80
KOKESH ATHLETIC
SUPPLIES
197K45
07/10/90
97.60
KOKESH ATHLETIC
SUPPLIES
197K45
07/10/90
933.00
KOKESH ATHLETIC
SOCER GOALS
197K45
07/05/90
98.32
KOKESH ATHLETIC
PLAYGROUND BALLS
197K45
07/10/90
933.00-
KOKESH ATHLETIC
SOCCER GOALS
197K45
07/10/90
933.00
KOKESH ATHLETIC
SOCCER GOALS
1,791.17
k * * *kk
197K57
07/10/90
3,925.50
KUETHER DIST. CO.
BEER
197K57
07/09/90
6,724.75
KUETHER DIST. CO.
BEER
10,650.25
k k k k k k
07 -16 -90 PAGE 20
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
10- 4600 - 140 -14 2905
10- 4600 - 180 -18 2966
23- 4600 - 611 -61 2928 8274
10- 4580 - 301 -30 10610 6631
10- 4540 - 520 -52 35855 7266
30- 4544 - 782 -78 54610 8061
10- 4208 - 160 -16
10- 4504 - 335 -30
10- 4504 - 560 -56
10- 4504- 646 -64
10- 4540 - 520 -52
10- 4604 - 646 -64
27- 4540 - 666 -66
27- 4604 - 664 -66
28- 4504 - 702 -70
10- 4504 - 621 -62
10- 4504 - 621 -62
10- 4504 - 621 -62
10- 4504 - 621 -62
10- 4504- 621 -62
10- 4504 - 624 -62
10- 4540 - 621 -62
10- 4540 - 621 -62
50- 4630 - 822 -82
50- 4630 - 842 -84
625633 8039
581696 8050
625461 8348
582240 8035
842315 8332
842290 8440
844807 8506
844733 8536
31279
34145
34628
34612
33074 8566
33074 8566
33074 8566
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
07 -16 -90
PAGE 21
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. #
MESSAGE
197L01
07/05/90
615.00
LINDA KOZAK
SERVICES 7/4 -7/17
30- 4201 - 781 -78
615.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
197L04
07/09/90
40.56
LAHASS
MARKER LIGHTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
9830
8180
197L04
07/09/90
200.00
LAHASS
REAR APRON
10- 4620- 560 -56
9852
240.56
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
197L28
07/09/90
262.69
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
PARTS
10- 4504 - 325 -30
8019
197L28
06/29/90
270.49
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
PARTS
10- 4504 - 325 -30
7887
197L28
07/09/90
33.92
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
PARTS
10- 4504 - 646 -64
8017
197L28
07/09/90
207.86
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
8015
197L28
07/09/90
166.81
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
PARTS
10- 4580- 301 -30
8018
197L28
07/09/90
394.91
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
8016
197L28
06/29/90
390.65
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
7890
197L28
06/29/90
253.39
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
7889
197L28
07/09/90
470.86
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
PARTS
40- 4540 - 801 -80
7751
197L28
06/29/90
170.16
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
PARTS
40- 4580 - 801 -80
7888
2,621.74
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
19704
07/10/90
31.50
LEEF BROS.
INC.
PRO SERVICES
23- 4201 - 612 -61
31.50
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
197L38
07/09/90
864.00
LEITNER
COMPANY
TOPDRESSING
27- 4562 - 664 -66
8454
864.00
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
197L46
07/09/90
196.75
LIEN INFECTION
CON
SANITATION
27- 4201 - 663 -66
5512
196.75
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
197L56
07/09/90
7.00
LINHOFF
PHOTO PROCESS
12- 4504 - 434 -43
165998
7.00
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
197L70
07/10/90
90.00
LUCY ROSCHE
CLEANING
27- 4201 - 662 -66
30592
8252
90.00
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
197L80
07/09/90
79.35
LYNDALE
GARDEN CTR
GREENHOUSE SUP
10- 4504 - 643 -64
41152
8033
79.35
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
07 =16 -90
PAGE 22
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
#
MESSAGE
197L82
07/09/90
59.88
LYNDALE HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
357486
8521
59.88
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
197L97
06/29/90
100.00
MERFELD -BERT
POLICE SERVICES
10- 4100 - 430 -42
100.00
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
197M07
07/09/90
8,591.66
MARK VII SALES
BEER
50- 4630 - 862 -86
8,591.66
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
197M10
07/09/90
55.95
MARSHALL & SWIFT
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 200 -20
55.95
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
197M14
06/29/90
5.00
MAUMA
MEETING
10- 4206 - 140 -14
5.00
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
197M16
07/09/90
615.30
MCCAREN DESIGNS
TREES /FLOWERS /SHRUBS
30- 4560 - 782 -78
3251
8209
615.30
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
197M19
07/09/90
177.14
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 664 -66
177.14
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
197M22
07/09/90
158.98
MCNEILUS STEEL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 301 -30
75150
8243
158.98
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
197M27
06/29/90
496.00
MERIT SUPPLY
BUG SPRAY
10- 4504 - 301 -30
24464
7958
197M27
06/29/90
240.00
MERIT SUPPLY
COVERALLS
10- 4504- 301 -30
24555
8195
197M27
07/09/90
146.90
MERIT SUPPLY
RIGID LINER
10- 4504 - 646 -64
24597
8322
197M27
07/09/90
288.60
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
10- 4512 - 540 -54
24610
8333
197M27
06/29/90
338.40
MERIT SUPPLY
SEWER BLOCS CONT
10- 4540 - 560 -56
24499
7954
197M27
06/29/90
495.00
MERIT SUPPLY
WASH /WAX
10- 4620 - 560 -56
24548
8182
197M27
07/09/90
495.00
MERIT SUPPLY
WASH /WAX
10- 4620 - 560 -56
24586
8246
197M27
07/09/90
67.80
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
27- 4512 - 663 -66
24653
8460
197M27
07/09/90
465.65
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
24628
843
197M27
07/09/90
457.95
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
40- 4504 - 801 -80
24587
8245
197M27
06/29/90
432.00
MERIT SUPPLY
WYP ALLS
40- 4504 - 801 -80
24465
7959
197M27
06/29/90
196.00
MERIT SUPPLY
BUG SPRAY
40- 4504 - 801 -80
24531
8053
197M27
06/29/90
200.15
MERIT SUPPLY
SOAP
40- 4504 - 803 -80
24498
8037
197M27
06/29/90
338.40
MERIT SUPPLY
SEWER BLOC CONT
40- 4540 - 560 -56
24499
7954
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
197M27
06/29/90
197M27
06/29/90
* * * * **
10- 4504- 440 -44
197M32
07/05/90
* * * * **
10- 4540 - 440 -44
197M35
07/09/90
197M35
07/09/90
197M35
07/09/90
* * * * **
197M42
07/05/90
197M42
07/09/90
197M42
07/05/90
197M42
07/05/90
197M42
07/09/90
197M42
07/05/90
197M42
07/05/90
* * * * **
197M46
07/09/90
197M46
07/09/90
197M46
07/09/90
* * * * **
197M58
07/09/90
* * * * **
197M62
07/10/90
197M62
07/10/90
197M62
06/29/90
197M63
07/10/90
197M63
07/09/90
197M63
07/10/90
* * * * **
197M65 07/09/90
AMOUNT
338.40-
490.00
4,809.45 *
383.64
383.64 *
14,850.00
14,850.00-
14,850.00
14,850.00 *
141.16
135.99
256.49
11,206.43
10,684.19
11,210.61
115.01
33,749.88
17.60
98.80
119.90
236.30
442.10
442.10
455.60•
83.00
67.20
605.80 *
254.96
373.65
624.65
1,253.26 *
242.18
242.18 *
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
MERIT SUPPLY SEWER BLOC CONT
MERIT SUPPLY SEWER BLOCS
M AMUNDSON
METRO WASTE CONTROL
METRO WASTE CONTROL
METRO WASTE CONTROL
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR
METZ BAKING CO
METZ BAKING CO
METZ BAKING CO
MILLIPORE
MIDWEST LSCAPING
MIDWEST LSCAPING
MIDWEST LSCAPING
MN. BAR
MN. BAR
MN. BAR
MN. BLUEPRINT
CIGARETTES
BLDG REPORT
BLDG REPAOR
BLDG REPAOR
BLACKTOP
BLACKTOP
BLACKTOP
BLACKTOP
BLACKTOP
BLACKTOP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CONCESSIONS
BREAD
BREAD
07 -16 -90 PAGE 23
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
40- 4540 - 560 -56 24499 7954
40- 4540 - 801 -80 24500 8044
50- 4632 - 862 -86
10- 3095 - 490 -49
10- 3095 - 490 -49
10- 3095 - 490 -49
10- 4524 - 301 -30
10- 4524 - 301 -30
10- 4524 - 301 -30
10- 4524 - 314 -30
10- 4524 - 314 -30
10- 4524 - 314 -30
41- 4504 - 900 -90
26- 4624 - 683 -68
27- 4624 - 663 -66 5511
27- 4624 - 663 -66 5511
LAB SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 482 -48
70236
8303
LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 440 -44
25027
8330
SHRUBS FOR GROUNDS
10- 4504- 440 -44
25145
8347
EDGING
10- 4540 - 440 -44
23849
7236
MIX
50- 4632 - 822 -82
MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
MIX
50- 4632 - 862 -86
FIELD BOOKS /PAPER 10- 4504 - 260 -26 191494 8515
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* *" -CKS
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT
* * * * **
197M68
06/29/90
200.57
07 -16 -90
200.57 *
197M69
06/29/90
336.00
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
#
336.00 *
197M70
07/10/90
178.00
197M70
07/05/90
80.00
* ** -CKS
MN
258.00 *
197M76
06/29/90
138.44
197M76
06/29/90
15.84
197M76
06/29/90
109.25
197M76
07/09/90
86.71 _g+ -e.G --
* * * * **
CONWAY
350.24
197M80
07/05/90
32.50
197M80
07/05/90
249.01
197M80
06/29/90
21.24
8507
302.75
197M81
07/05/90.
297.03
197M81
07/05/90
289.00
197M81
07/05/90
112.59
197M81
06/29/90
59.20
197M81
07/05/90
289.00 -
197M81
07/05/90
289.00
7966
757.82
* * * * **
JACKETS /OVERALLS
10- 4642- 301 -30
197M85
07/09/90
120.00
197M85
07/09/90
229.00
197M85
06/29/90
91.32
197M85
07/09/90
33.00
473.32
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
MN
197M90
07/09/90
204.00
88110
204.00
* * * * **
SUBURBAN NEWS
ORD PUBLICATION
197N07
07/05/90
53.94
197N07
07/05/90
196.00
197N07
07/10/90
66.50
197N07
07/10/90
814.00
CHECK REGISTER
07 -16 -90
PAGE 24
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
#
MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
MN
CELLULAR PHONE
PHONE
10- 4204 - 140 -14
807727
MCC
/MIDWEST
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
23- 4248 - 612 -61
41034
MN.
CONWAY
HOSE
10- 4901- 440 -44
15893
7237
MN.
CONWAY
COVERALLS
29- 4504 - 722 -72
15668
8507
* ** -CKS
MN.
GLOVE
CANVAS
10- 4504 - 301 -30
44092
7965
MN.
GLOVE
RAIN HOODS
10- 4642 - 301 -30
44315
7966
MN.
GLOVE
JACKETS /OVERALLS
10- 4642- 301 -30
44146
7966
MN.
GLOVE
BOOT
10- 4642- 301 -30
44531
8225
* ** -CKS
MN
SUBURBAN NEWS
ORD PUBLICATION
10- 4210 - 140 -14
88110
MN
SUBURBAN NEWS
ORD PUBLICATION
10- 4210 - 140 -14
88109
MN
SUBURBAN NEWS
AD FOR BIDS
10- 4210 - 140 -14
88065
MN.
TORO INC.
IRRIGATION PARTS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
128679
8292
MN.
TORO INC.
MOWER REPAIR
27- 4540 - 664 -66
129473
8368
MN.
TORO INC.
MOWER PARTS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
128511
8312
MN.
TORO INC.
IRRIGATION PARTS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
126531
8205
MN.
TORO INC.
MOWER /REPAIR
29- 4540 - 664 -66
129473
8368
MN.
TORO INC.
MOWER /REPAIR
29- 4540 - 664 -66
129473
8368
* ** -CKS
MN.
WANNER
LABOR
10- 4504 - 325 -30
75603
MN.
WANNER
SIGN POST
10- 4504 - 325 -30
75604
MN.
WANNER
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
75553
8419
MN.
WANNER
BORE CASTING
10- 4620 - 560 -56
75579
* ** -CKS
MODEL
STONE CO.
HAND CURB
10- 4528 - 314 -30
88260
7098
* ** -CKS
MTS
NW SOUND
REPAIRS
10- 4501 - 627 -62
84253
8008
MTS
NW SOUND
REPAIRS
10- 4501 - 627 -62
84252
8008
MTS
NW SOUND
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 624 -62
84293
MTS
NW SOUND
SOUND SPEAKERS
10- 4504 - 624 -62
84275
8390
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
07 -16 -90
PAGE 25
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O:
#
MESSAGE
197N07
07/10/90
586.00
MTS NW SOUND
REPAIRS
10- 4504 - 624 -62
84265
8528
197N07
07/09/90
300.00
MTS NW SOUND
MACHINE /EQUIP
30- 1340 - 782 -78
84297
8539
2,016.44 *
xxxxxk
* ** -CKS
197N16
07/10/90
43.09
NSP
POWER /LIGHTS
40- 4252 - 801 -80
43.09 *
xxwxxx
* ** -CKS
197N21
07/09/90
10.34
NAPA AUTO PARTS
CARS KIT
10- 4540 - 560 -56
722631
8316
197N21
07/09/90
30.82
NAPA AUTO PARTS
BATTERY
10- 4540 - 560 -56
723230
8331
41.16 *
197N22
07/05/90
146.72
NATL GUARDIAN SYS.
ALARM SERVICE
23- 4304 - 612 -61
245994
197N22
07/05/90
184.78
NATL GUARDIAN SYS.
ALARM SERVICE
50- 4304 - 861 -86
245996
331.50 *
wxkxxx
* ** -CKS
197N31
07/09/90
148.25
NEBCO DISTRIBUTING
FOOD
26- 4624 - 683 -68
024467
7070
197N31
06/29/90
9.95
NEBCO DISTRIBUTING
POPCORN
26- 4624 - 683 -68
024144
7070
197N31
06/29/90
39.50
NEBCO DISTRIBUTING
CONCESSIONS
26- 4624 - 683 -68
024116
7070
197N31
07/05/90
91.80
NEBCO DISTRIBUTING
CONCESSIONS SUPPLY
26- 4624 - 683 -68
024406
7070
197N31
06/29/90
313.45
NEBCO DISTRIBUTING
CONCESSIONS
26- 4624 - 683 -68
024117
7070
197N31
07/05/90
389.72
NEBCO DISTRIBUTING
CONCESSIONS SUPPLY
26- 4624 - 683 -68
024312
7070
197N31
07/05/90
3.89
NEBCO DISTRIBUTING
CONCESSIONS SUPPLY
26- 4624 - 683 -68
024292
7070
197N31
07/05/90
91.50 -.
NEBCO DISTRIBUTING
CREDIT
26- 4624 - 683 -68
024168
7070
905.06 *
xxkxwx
* ** -CKS
197N33
07/09/90
83.00
NELSON RADIO COMM
SIREN REPAIR
10- 4620 - 560 -56
15803
8495
83.00 *
xwwwkk
**A-CKS
197N54
07/05/90
108.40
NORTHERN AIRE
LIFE LINE /HOOK
26- 4504 - 682 -68
1525
108.40
wxxwxx
* ** -CKS
197N68
07/09/90
212.76
NORTHSTAR ICE
ICE
50- 4632 - 822 -82
197N68
07/09/90
519.48
NORTHSTAR ICE
ICE
50- 4632 - 842 -84
197N68
07/09/90
521.10
NORTHSTAR ICE
ICE
50- 4632 - 862 -86
1,253.34 *
x* x k k k
* ** -CKS
197N76
06/29/90
70.33
NTCC
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 440 -44
61703
8176
70.33 *
xxxwwk
* ** -CKS
197N82
07/05/90
29.36
NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY
CRAFT SUPPLIES
23- 4588 - 611 -61
173596
8272
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
197N82
197N82
06/29/90
07/05/90
208.23
NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY
CRAFT SUPPLIES
197N82
06/29/90
97.26
158.03
NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY
NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY
COST /GOODS SOLD
COST /GOODS SOLD
197N82
197N82
06/29/90
07/10/90
94.45
67.72
NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY
COST /GOODS SOLD
NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY
COST /GOODS SOLD
655.05 *
* * * * **
197N96
07/10/90
82.90
MINN COMM PAGING
SERVICE CONTRACT
82.90 *
* * * * **
197N98
07/05/90
216.28
NANCY KNUDSON
PRO SERVICES
216.28 *
* * * * **
197030
07/09/90
196.77
OLD DUTCH FOODS
CHIPS
196.77 *
* * * * **
197037
07/10/90
153.00
BILL OLSON
BLACK DIRT
153.00
* * * * **
197P11
197P11
06/29/90
06/29/90
150.00
83.00
PARK NIC MED CTR
SHOTS
PARK NIC MED CTR
PHYSICAL
233.00
* * * * **
197P30
197P30
07/10/90
07/10/90
1,815.45
287.05
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
PEPSI .
197P30
07/10/90
287.05-
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
MIX
MIX
197P30
197P30
07/10/90
07/09/90
207.12
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
MIX
197P30
07/10/90
440.55
287.05
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
MIX
MIX
2,750.17 *
* * * * **
197P58
07/05/90
28.50
PLUNKETTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
28.50 *
* * * * **
197P78
07/10/90
26.00
PRINTERS SERV INC
BLADE SHARPENEING
26.00 *
* * * * **
197P80
07/10/90
317.70
PRIOR LAKE AGG.
SAND
07 -16 -90 PAGE 26
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
23- 4588 - 611 -61 173350 8086
23- 4624 - 613 -61 173770 8374
23- 4624 - 613 -61 173544 8092
23- 4624 - 613 -61 173350 8086
23- 4624 - 613 -61 174005 8375
* ** -CKS
30- 4288 - 782 -78 8389
* ** -CKS
28- 4224 - 701 -70
* ** -CKS
27- 4624 - 663 -66 5514
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 301 -30 7105
* *4 -CKS
10- 4201 - 440 -44
10- 4212 - 510 -51
* ** -CKS
27- 4624 - 663 -66 5513
50- 4622 - 862 -86
50- 4622 - 862 -86
50- 4632 - 822 -82
50- 4632- 842 -84
50- 4632 - 862 -86
* ** -CKS
28- 4504 - 702 -70 126086
* ** -CKS
28- 4274 - 704 -70 51687
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 314 -30 7092
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
317.70 *
x * *kk*
197P84
07/05/90
188.70
PRO INSTANT PRINT
JUPITER REPORT
kxk *xx
188.70 *
197Q09
07/10/90
223.51
QUALITY REFRIG
REPAIRS
223.51 *
*x * *x*
197Q20
07/09/90
94.44
QUICK SERV BATTERY
FRAM CORP
197Q20
07/09/90
40.20
QUICK SERV BATTERY
FRAM CORP
197Q20
07/09/90
96.24
QUICK SERV BATTERY
FRAM CORP
197Q20
07/09/90
72.24
QUICK SERV BATTERY
FRAM CORP
303.12
* *xxx*
197R01
07/10/90
586.00
R &R SPECIALTIES INC
REPAIRS
197R01
07/05/90
86.72
R &R SPECIALTIES INC
REPAIRS
672.72 *
kxx * *x
197R12
06/29/90
18.93
RADIO SHACK
VIDEO DUBBING KIT
18.93 *
197R13
07/10/90
132.00
RADIO INSTALLS
RADIO RENTAL
132.00 *
197R22
07/09/90
1,233.38
REM SUPPLIES
MACH /EQUIP
197R22
07/09/90
26.28
-REM SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
197R22
06/29/90
123.60
REM SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,383.26
197R25
07/09/90
70.80
RENTAL EQUIP & SALES
REPAIR SAW
197825
07/09/90
122.15
RENTAL EQUIP & SALES
REPAIR SAW
197R25
07/09/90
174.00
RENTAL EQUIP & SALES
REPLACE SAW
366.95
* * k * * k
197R33
07/10/90
5,488.20
REX DISTR.
BEER
197R33
07/09/90
7,152.00
REX DISTR.
BEER
197R33
07/10/90
6,384.16
REX DISTR.
BEER
19,024.36
kxkxk*
07 -16 -90 PAGE 27
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
10- 4600 - 627 -62 35298 8511
* ** -CKS
27- 4248 - 663 -66 69213 8581
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56 43339 8219
10- 4540- 560 -56 43575- 8222
10- 4540 - 560 -56 43336 8427
10- 4540 - 560 -56 43328 7955
* ** -CKS
28- 4248 - 704 -70 13246 8362
28- 4248 - 704 -70 13225 8311
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 520 -52 19720 7957
10- 4226 - 440 -44 17859 5057
* ** -CKS
30- 1340 - 782 -78 01113 7415
30- 4504 - 782 -78 1140 8572
30- 4504 - 783 -78 1142 8434
* ** -CKS
10- 4248 - 644 -64 12310 8178
10- 4504 - 644 -64 12320 8190
10- 4580 - 644 -64 12319 8190
* ** -CKS
50- 4630- 822 -82
50- 4630 - 842 -84
50- 4630 - 862 -86
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
07 -16 -90
PAGE 28
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
#
MESSAGE
197R73
06/29/90
83.02
ROTO ROOTER SERV.
DRAIN CLEANING
10- 4248 - 520 -52
8458
83.02
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
197R81
06/29/90
141.10
RUBENSTEIN & ZIFF
CRAFT SUPPLIES
23- 4588- 611 -61
168244
8267
197R81
07/10/90
31.62
RUBENSTEIN & ZIFF
CRAFT SUPPLIES
23- 4588 - 611 -61
169312
8376
172.72 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
197R98
07/05/90
96.00
ROXANNE SEIDEL
SERVICES
30- 4201 - 781 -78
96.00 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
197506
07/09/90
65.93
SEARS
GENERA SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
8541
65.93
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
197S14
06/29/90
71.75
SCHWAB - VOLLHABER
SERVICE CONTRACT
30- 4288 - 782 -78
8433
71.75
197515
07/09/90
58.49
SEARS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
7318
58.49 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
197S19
07/09/90
128.17
SEELYE PLASTICS
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 802 -80
175420
8218
128.17 *
* ** -CKS
197S27
06/29/90
192.47
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 301 -30
47936
7642
197S27
06/29/90
4.29-
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
CREDIT
10- 4504 - 325 -30
48009
7642
197S27
06/29/90
222.31
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 335 -30
88753
7877
197S27
07/09/90
39.96
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
PAINT
10- 4544 - 646 -64
95659
8487
197S27
07/09/90
81.75-
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
DROP CLOTH
40- 4504 - 802 -80
04289
8188
197S27
07/09/90
81.75
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
DROP CLOTH
40- 4504 - 802 -80
04289
8188
.197S27
07/09/90
51.75
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
DROP CLOTH
'40- 4504 - 802 -80
04289
8188
197S27
07/09/90
158.00
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
PARTS
40- 4504 - 803 -80
06987
8494
660.20
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
197S34
07/09/90
2.31
SOUTHDALE FORD
COCK ASY
10- 4540 - 560 -56
242192
197534
07/09/90
82.80
SOUTHDALE FORD
ADAPTER
10- 4540 - 560 -56
241845
85.11
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
197S36
07/09/90
5,192.45
SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO.
BEER
50- 4630 - 822 -82
197S36
07/09/90
11,614.75
SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO.
BEER
50- 4630 - 842 -84
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
SHOP
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
197S36
07/09/90
162.50
PRINT
SHOP
16,969.70 *
* * * * **
PRINT
SHOP
197S50
06/29/90
100.00
SHOP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
100.00 *
* * * * **
197S67
06/29/90
3,208.00
3,208.00 *
* * * * **
197S72
06/29/90
43.04
43.04 *
197573
07/10/90
1,098.68
1,098.68 *
* * * * **
197S77
07/09/90
14.18
197S77
07/09/90
188.39
197S77
07/09/90
24.38
197577
07/09/90
6.41
233.36 *
* * * * **
197592
07/10/90
35.64
35.64 *
* * * * **
197S97
07/10/90
2,281.88 2-28j 59-
2 , 2 81.88 g�-
* * * * **
197T05
06/29/90
537.50
197T05
07/09/90
977.00
197T05
07/09/90
32.00
197T05
07/09/90
64.00
197T05
07/09/90
188.00
1,798.50
* * * * **
197T08
07/10/90
73.98
197T08
07/10/90
119.85
197T08
07/10/90
8.22
197T08
07/10/90
362.62
197T08
07/10/90
69.89
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO. BEER
07 -16 -90 PAGE 29
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
50- 4630 - 862 -86
JOHN SHEPARD POLICE SERVICES 10- 4100 - 430 -42
STORE FRONT HUMAN SERVICE 10- 4201 - 504 -50 112307
STREICHERS LOCK TIMER 10- 4540 - 560 -56 8413
STRGAR - ROSCOE -FAUSH PRO ENG SERVICE 60- 1300 - 291 -04 901320
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET HUB CAP
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET FLASHER /TRANSDUC
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET VALVE
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET BEZEL
SYSTEM SUPPLY RIBBONS
SEH PRO SERVICES
THE
PRINT
SHOP
SR NEWSLETTER
THE
PRINT
SHOP
PRINTING
THE
PRINT
SHOP
PRINTING
THE
PRINT
SHOP
PRINTING
THE
PRINT
SHOP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
TARGET
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
TARGET
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
TARGET
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
TARGET
PHOTO SUPPLIES
TARGET
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4540 - 560 -56 128346
10- 4540 - 560 -56 128244
10- 4540 - 560 -56 128263
10- 4540 - 560 -56 127903
23- 4504 - 611 -61 70037 4666
40- 4201 - 800 -80 7729
10- 4504 - 628 -62 14010 8214
12- 4504 - 434 -43 91014 8535
12- 4504 - 434 -43 92530
12- 4504 - 434 -43 92063
12- 4504 - 434 -43 90841
10- 4504 - 436 -42
10- 4504- 624 -62
12- 4504 - 434 -43
12- 4508 - 434 -43
23- 4504 - 612 -61
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
197T08
07/10/90
89.10
197T08
07/10/90
66.80
790.46 *
* * * * **
197T10
07/10/90
360.00
360.00 *
197T11
07/05/90
134.10
134.10 *
* * * * **
197T13
07/09/90
1,050.00
197T13
07/09/90
120.00
197T13
07/09/90
83.89
1,253.89 *
* * * * **
197T29
07/09/90
10,326.87
10,326.87 *
197T30
07/09/90
15,515.25
* * * * **
15,515.25 *
197T42
07/09/90
208.23
208.23 *
* * * * **
197T53
07/09/90
7,255.26
7,255.26 *
* * * * **
197T66
07/10/90
6.16
197T66
07/05/90
80.35
197T66
06/29/90
316.52
403.03 *
* * * * **
197T72
07/05/90
571.20
197T72
06/29/90
571.20
* * * * **
1,142.40 *
197T74
07/09/90
29.80
197T74
07/05/90
131.25
197T74
07/05/90
210.00
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
TARGET CRAFT SUPPLIES
TARGET GENERAL SUPPLIES
TERRY ANN SALES CO.
TESSMAN SEED & CHEM
TOM HORWATH
TOM HORWATH
TOM HORWATH
THOMSEN - NYBECK
THORPE DISTR.
TOOLS BY OLSEN
TRACY OIL
07 -16 -90 PAGE 30
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
23- 4588 - 611 -61
26- 4504 - 682 -68
* ** -CKS
CUPS 27- 4504 - 663 -66 12479 8577
FERTILIZER 30- 4558- 782 -78 60285 8107
FORESTRY
ASSESSING
MILEAGE
PROSECUTING
BEER
GAS CANS /FUNNELS
GASOLINE
TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT CRAFT SUPPLIES
TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT CRAFT SUPPLIES
TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT CRAFT SUPPLIES
TROPICAL SNO
TROPICAL SNO
TURF SUPPLY CO
TURF SUPPLY CO
TURF SUPPLY CO
TROPICAL SNO
CONCESSIONS
SUPPLIES
FERTILIZER
SULPHOR
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 644 -64
10- 4201 - 980 -64
10- 4208 - 644 -64
* ** -CKS
10- 4201- 220 -22
50- 4632- 862 -86
* ** -CKS
27- 4504 - 664 -66 26847 8290
* ** -CKS
10- 4612 - 560 -56 T19418
* ** -CKS
23- 4588 - 611 -61 386345 8268
23-4588-611-61.385256 8268
1
23- 4588 - 611 -6384373 8088
* ** -CKS
26- 4624 - 683 -68 10457 7689
26- 4624 - 683 -68 10410 7689
* ** -CKS
27- 4504 - 664 -66 30310 8420
27- 4558 - 664 -66 30184 8220
27- 4558 - 664 -66 30209 8220
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
197T74
07/05/90
197T74
07/05/90
k* k k k k
210.00-
197T88
07/10/90
k k k k k k
197U08
07/05/90
kkkkkk
MIX
197U25
07/05/90
197U25
07/05/90
197U25
07/10/90
578.00 *
197U30
07/09/90
k k k k k k
OXYGEN
197V10
07/10/90
k k k k k k
226.60
197V15
06/29/90
19706
06/29/90
kkkkkk
21.00
197V43
07/05/90
197V43
07/05/90
197V43
07/05/90
k k k k k k
197V45
.07/10/90
197V45
07/10/90
197V45
k k k k k k
07/10/90
07 -16 -90 PAGE 31
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
27- 4558 - 665 -66 30209 8220
27- 4558 - 665 -66 30209 8220
* ** -CKS
50- 4632 - 862 -86
* ** -CKS
50- 4262 - 861 -86 22727 7797
* ** -CKS
10- 4510 - 440 -44 759991 5805
10- 4510- 440 -44 808134 5805
10- 4510 - 440 -44 3100 8116
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 640 -64 8486
* ** -CKS
28- 4612 - 704 -70
* ** -CKS
10- 4514 - 520 -52 315659 8438
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 621 -62 31186
* ** -CKS
27- 4540 - 665 -66 6671 8080
27- 4540 - 665 -66 6658 8009
27- 4540 - 665 -66 6131 7682
* ** -CKS
50- 4214 - 822 -82
50- 4214 - 842 -84
50- 4214 - 862 -86
* ** -CKS
CHECK REG_STER
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
210.00
TURF SUPPLY CO.
SULPHOR
210.00-
TURF SUPPLY CO.
SULPHOR
371.05 *
70.80
TWIN CITY HOME JUICE
MIX
70.80 *
578.00
UNIFORM UNLIMITED
JACKETS PURCHASED
578.00 *
67.47
UNIVERSAL MED SERV
OXYGEN
21.00
UNIVERSAL MED SERV
OXYGEN
226.60
UNIVERSAL MED SERV
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
315.07 *
21.00
US WEST PAGING
BEEPER /VINCE
21.00 *
209.51
VALLEY INDUSTRIAL
LP FUEL
209.51 *
475.05
VAN PAPER CO.
PAPER SUPPLIE
475.05 *
22.00
VAUGHN DISPLAY
AMERICAN FLAG
22.00 *
44.67
VERSATILE VEHICLE
CART PARTS
152.81
VERSATILE VEHICLE
CART PARTS
56.75
VERSATILE VEHICLE
CART PARTS
254.23 *
52.50
VFW POST #5555
ADVERTISING
52.50
VFW POST #5555
ADVERTISING
52.50
VFW POST #5555
ADVERTISING
157.50 *
07 -16 -90 PAGE 31
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
27- 4558 - 665 -66 30209 8220
27- 4558 - 665 -66 30209 8220
* ** -CKS
50- 4632 - 862 -86
* ** -CKS
50- 4262 - 861 -86 22727 7797
* ** -CKS
10- 4510 - 440 -44 759991 5805
10- 4510- 440 -44 808134 5805
10- 4510 - 440 -44 3100 8116
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 640 -64 8486
* ** -CKS
28- 4612 - 704 -70
* ** -CKS
10- 4514 - 520 -52 315659 8438
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 621 -62 31186
* ** -CKS
27- 4540 - 665 -66 6671 8080
27- 4540 - 665 -66 6658 8009
27- 4540 - 665 -66 6131 7682
* ** -CKS
50- 4214 - 822 -82
50- 4214 - 842 -84
50- 4214 - 862 -86
* ** -CKS
.1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
197V80
06/29/90
316.29
VOSS ELECTRIC SUP
LAMPS
316.29 *
* * * * **
197W08
06/29/90
17.23
W.W. GRAINGER
GASKET KIT
17.23 *
* * * * **
197W11
07/09/90
491.11
W. GORDON SMITH
GASOLINE
197W11
07/09/90
491.11-
W. GORDON SMITH
GASOLINE
197W11
07/09/90
491.11
W. GORDON SMITH
GASOLINE
197W11
07/09/90
491.11
W. GORDON SMITH
GASOLINE
197W11
07/10/90
365.92
W. GORDON SMITH
GASOLINE
1,348.14 *
* * * * **
197W15
06/29/90
100.00
WALTER JOHNSON
POLICE SERVICES
100.00 *
* * * * **
197W28
07/09/90
166.80
WATER PRODUCTS
HYDRANT APINT
197W28
07/09/90
166.80
WATER PRODUCTS
HYDRANT PAINT
197W28
07/09/90
166.80-
WATER PRODUCTS
HYDRANT APINT
166.80 *
* * * * **
197W44
07/09/90
48.55
WEST WELD SUPPLY CO.
WIRE BRUSH /VALVE
48.55 *
* * * * **
197W49
06/29/90
70.57
WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT
LEADER
197W49
07/09/90
277.43
WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT
VALVE
348.00 *
* * * * **
197W52
06/29/90
100.00
WM WALSH
POLICE SERVICES
100.00 *
* * * * **
197W66
07/09/90
•60.66
WILLIAMS STEEL
SPRAY APINT
* * * * **
60.66
197W79
06/29/90
550.00
WITZEL TREE MOVING
MOVE TREES
550.00
07 -16 -90 PAGE 32
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4540- 322 -30 270298 8320
* ** -CKS
40- 4540 - 802 -80 8231
* ** -CKS
27- 4612- 644 -64 41345 8150
27- 4612 - 644 -64 41345 8150
27- 4612- 664 -66 41345 8150
27- 4612 - 664 -66 41346 8151
27- 4612 - 664 -66 41376 8357
* ** -CKS
10- 4100 - 430 -42
* ** -CKS
40- 4544 - 803 -80 136136 8179
40- 4544- 803 -80 136136 8179
40- 4544 - 803 -80 136136 8179
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 560 -56 84375 7835
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 540 -54 23955 7956
10- 4620 - 560 -56 24036 8428
* ** -CKS
10- 4100 - 430 -42
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 560 -56
* ** -CKS
10- 4560 - 644 -64 1549 7941
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
* * * * **
197W81 07/09/90
* * * * **
197W92 06/29/90
* * * * **
197Z14 06/29/90
* * * * **
1,644,235.04
43,887.53
CHECK REGISTER
AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
16.00
16.00
100.00
100.00 *
150.61
150.61 *
13,096.21
11,428.17
354.27
16,215.58
57,543.01
1,596.94
1,328.00
8,272.92
43=944-.-4-5
4--4s
64,876.71
112,886.20
354,695.33
363,205.00
2,693,848.33
WM H MCCOY
WROBLESKI -HENRY
ZIEGLER INC
FUND 10 TOTAL
FUND 12 TOTAL
FUND 23 TOTAL
FUND 25 TOTAL
FUND 26 TOTAL
FUND 27 TOTAL
FUND 28 TOTAL
FUND 29 TOTAL
FUND 30 TOTAL
FUND 40 TOTAL
FUND 41 TOTAL
FUND 50 TOTAL
FUND 60 TOTAL
FUND 66 TOTAL
TOTAL
PROPANE
POLICE SERVICES
FILTERS
GENERAL FUND
COMMUNICATIONS
ART CENTER
CAPITAL FUND
SWIMMING POOL FUND
GOLF COURSE FUND
RECREATION CENTER FUND
GUN RANGE FUND
EDINBOROUGH PARK
UTILITY FUND
STORM SEWER UTILITY
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
CONSTRUCTION FUND
IMP BOND REDEMPTION #2
07 -16 -90 PAGE 33
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 301 -30 61753 8394
10- 4100 - 430 -42
10- 4248 - 560 -56 7871
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
-1µp%
Ch fck V&D POP
Pq�fS R�`�fR OqT P� �E�T
T ED
�R
f �
R
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
152701 06/29/90
* * * * **
152A82
06/29/90
152A82
06/29/90
152A82
06/29/90 .
* * * * **
152A84
06/29/90
152A84
06/29/90
* * * * **
155M98
06/29/90
155M98
06/29/90
155M98
06/29/90
155M98
06/29/90
155M98
06/29/90
155M98
06/29/90
155M98
06/29/90
155M98
06/29/90
155M98
06/29/90
155M98
06/29/90
155M98
06/29/90
155M98
06/29/90
155M98
06/29/90
* * * * **
155P70 06/29/90
* * * * **
AMOUNT
06/29/90
2,930.00
US
2,930.00
*
18.58
155U27
4.55
100.00
10.70
WEST
33.83
*
10.50
06/29/90
10.50
US
21.00
*
156.67
297.78
689.50
360.68
102.86
240.30
68.97
285.25
939.29
917.08
65.72
1,622.27
78.92
5.825.29
5,000.00
5,000.00
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
J DOVOLIS REIMBURSEMENT
AT &T
AT &T
AT &T
AT &T
AT &T
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
MINNEGASCO
POSTMASTER
PHONE
PHONE
PHONE
PHONE
PHONE
HEAT
HEAT
HEAT
HEAT
HEAT
HEAT
HEAT
HEAT
HEAT
HEAT
HEAT
HEAT
HEAT
POSTAGE
155U27
06/29/90
2,994.23
US
WEST
COMM
PHONE
155U27
06/29/90
100.00
US
WEST
COMM
PHONE
155U27
06/29/90
103.64
US
WEST
COMM
PHONE
155U27
06/29/90
272.71
US
WEST
COMM
PHONE
155U27
06/29/90
165.80
US
WEST
COMM
PHONE
155U27
06/29/90
24.89
US
WEST
COMM
PHONE
155U27
06/29/90
50.77
US
WEST
COMM
PHONE
155U27
06/29/90
85.59
US
WEST
COMM
PHONE
155U27
06/29/90
49.42
US
WEST
COMM
PHONE
155U27
06/29/90
142.10
US
WEST
COMM
PHONE
155U27
06/29/90
165.20
US
WEST
COMM
PHONE
155U27
06/29/90
136.36
US
WEST
COMM
PHONE
4,290.71
* * * * **
06 -30 -90 PAGE 1
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
30- 3800 - 000 -00 MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL
27- 4256 - 667 -66 MANUAL
30- 4256- 782 -78 MANUAL
* ** -CKS
40- 4256 - 801 -80
MANUAL
50- 4256 - 821 -82
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4254 - 440 -44
MANUAL
10- 4254 - 520 -52
MANUAL
10- 4254 - 540 -54
MANUAL
10- 4254 - 646 -64
MANUAL
23- 4254 - 612 -61
MANUAL
27- 4254 - 662 -66
MANUAL
27- 4254 - 664 -66
MANUAL
27- 4254 - 667 -66
MANUAL.
28- 4254 - 702 -70
MANUAL
30- 4254 - 782 -78
MANUAL
40- 4254 - 801 -80
MANUAL
40- 4254 - 803 -80
MANUAL
50- 4254 - 841 -84
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4290 - 510 -51
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4256- 510 -51
MANUAL
10- 4256 - 622 -62
MANUAL
10- 4256 - 628 -62
MANUAL
10- 4256 - 646 -64
MANUAL
23- 4256- 612 -61
MANUAL
26- 4256 - 682 -68
MANUAL
30- 4256- 782 -78
MANUAL
40- 4256 - 801 -80
MANUAL
40- 4256 - 803 -80
MANUAL
50- 4256- 821 -82
MANUAL
50- 4256 - 841 -84
MANUAL
50- 4256 - 861 -86
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
* * * * ** * ** -CKS
159N16
06/29/90
249.61
NSP
LIGHT /POWER
10- 4252 - 301 -30
MANUAL
159N16
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
NSP
LIGHT /POWER
CHECK
REGISTER
159N16
06 -30 -90 PAGE 2
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
10- 4252 - 322 -30
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
156747
06/29/90
720.00
MANUAL
M ALSTAD
AC INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201 - 611 -61
MANUAL
LIGHT /POWER
10- 4252- 375 -30
720.00
159N16
06/29/90
458.24
NSP
LIGHT /POWER
* * * * **
MANUAL
159N16
06/29/90
47.18
NSP
LIGHT /POWER
* ** -CKS
158760
06/29/90
80.00
1,473.65
E MACHOLDA
PETTY CASH
.26- 1030 - 000 -00
MANUAL
158760
06/29/90
60.00
NSP
E MACHOLDA
CHANGE FUND
26 =1040- 000 -00
MANUAL
06/29/90
1,720.88
140.00
LIGHT /POWER
10- 4252 - 646 -64
MANUAL
159N16
06/29/90
* * * * **
NSP
LIGHT /POWER
23- 4252- 612 -61
MANUAL
159N16
06/29/90
* ** -CKS
158H83
06/29/90
220,000.00
MANUAL
HRA
TRANSFER
10- 1145 - 000 -00
MANUAL
LIGHT /POWER
27- 4252 - 662 -66
220,000.00
159N16
06/29/90
213.65
NSP
LIGHT /POWER
* * * * **
MANUAL
159N16
06/29/90
552.40
NSP
LIGHT /POWER
* ** -CKS
159768
06/29/90
8,360.00
12,381.91
GROSSMAN CHEV
PICK -UP TRUCK
10- 4901 - 650 -65
MANUAL
159N16
06/29/90
8,360.00
*
LIGHT /POWER
29- 4252 - 722 -72
MANUAL
159N16
159769
06/29/90
25.00
LIGHT /POWER
REC MN RESOURC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 507 -50
MANUAL
2,210.80
NSP
25.00
*
MANUAL
159N16
06/29/90
24,265.87
* * * * **
LIGHT /POWER
40- 4252 - 803 -80
MANUAL
159N16
06/29/90
358.66
* ** -CKS
159C33
06/29/90
82,000.00
159N16
CITY /EDINA
PAYROLL TRANSFER
50- 1010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
159C33
06/29/90
82,000.00-
06/29/90
CITY /EDINA
PAYROLL TRANSFER
50- 1010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
MANUAL
159N16
06/29/90
.00 *
NSP
LIGHT /POWER
50- 4252 - 841 -84
MANUAL
* * * * ** * ** -CKS
159N16
06/29/90
249.61
NSP
LIGHT /POWER
10- 4252 - 301 -30
MANUAL
159N16
06/29/90
19,698.61
NSP
LIGHT /POWER
10- 4252 - 321 -30
MANUAL
159N16
06/29/90
1,964.93
NSP
LIGHT /POWER
10- 4252 - 322 -30
MANUAL
159N16
06/29/90
2,749.60
NSP
LIGHT /POWER
10- 4252 - 330 -30
MANUAL
159N16
06/29/90
1,865.77
NSP
LIGHT /POWER
10- 4252- 375 -30
MANUAL
159N16
06/29/90
458.24
NSP
LIGHT /POWER
10- 4252 - 440 -44
MANUAL
159N16
06/29/90
47.18
NSP
LIGHT /POWER
10- 4252 - 460 -46
MANUAL
159N16
06/29/90
1,473.65
NSP
LIGHT /POWER
10- 4252 - 520 -52
MANUAL
159N16
06/29/90
2,066.04
NSP
LIGHT /POWER
10- 4252 - 540 -54
MANUAL
159N16
06/29/90
1,720.88
NSP
LIGHT /POWER
10- 4252 - 646 -64
MANUAL
159N16
06/29/90
485.78
NSP
LIGHT /POWER
23- 4252- 612 -61
MANUAL
159N16
06/29/90
140.50
NSP
LIGHT /POWER
26- 4252- 682 -68
MANUAL
159N16
06/29/90
2,188.21
NSP
LIGHT /POWER
27- 4252 - 662 -66
MANUAL
159N16
06/29/90
213.65
NSP
LIGHT /POWER
27- 4252 - 664 -66
MANUAL
159N16
06/29/90
552.40
NSP
LIGHT /POWER
27- 4252 - 667 -66
MANUAL -
159N16
06/29/90
12,381.91
NSP
LIGHT /POWER
28- 4252 - 702 -70
MANUAL
159N16
06/29/90
234.24
NSP
LIGHT /POWER
29- 4252 - 722 -72
MANUAL
159N16
06/29/90
6,911.17
NSP
LIGHT /POWER
30- 4252 - 782 -78
MANUAL
159N16
06/29/90
2,210.80
NSP
LIGHT /POWER
40- 4252 - 801 -80
MANUAL
159N16
06/29/90
24,265.87
NSP
LIGHT /POWER
40- 4252 - 803 -80
MANUAL
159N16
06/29/90
358.66
NSP
LIGHT /POWER
41- 4252 - 902 -90
MANUAL
159N16
06/29/90
115.75
NSP
LIGHT /POWER
41- 4252 - 902 -90
MANUAL
159N16
06/29/90
511.49
NSP
LIGHT /POWER
50- 4252-821 -82
MANUAL
159N16
06/29/90
975.41
NSP
LIGHT /POWER
50- 4252 - 841 -84
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK
REGISTER
06 -30 -90 PAGE 3
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
159N16
06/29/90
489.07
NSP
LIGHT /POWER
50- 4252 - 861 -86
MANUAL
84,329.42
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
162C51
06/28/90
50.00
COMM /REV
SALES
TAX
10- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
162C51
06/28/90
65.85
COMM /REV
SALES
TAX
10- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
162C51
06/28/90
162.71
COMM /REV
SALES
TAX
23- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
162C51
06/28/90
50.00
COMM /REV
SALES
TAX
23- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
162C51
06/28/90
300.00
COMM /REV
SALES
TAX
26- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
162051
06/28/90
6,000.00
COMM /REV
SALES
TAX
27- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
162C51
06/28/90
11,859.31
COMM /REV
SALES
TAX
27- 3357- 000 -00
MANUAL
162C51
06/28/90
21.02
COMM /REV
SALES
TAX
28- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
162C51
06/28/90
50.00
COMM /REV
SALES
TAX
29- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
162C51
06/28/90
164.66
COMM /REV
SALES
TAX
29- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
162C51
06/28/90
50.00
COMM /REV
SALES
TAX
30- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
162C51
06/28/90
130.11
COMM /REV
SALES
TAX
30- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
162C51
06/28/90
1,154.66
COMM /REV
SALES
TAX
40- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
162C51
06/28/90
250.00
COMM /REV
SALES
TAX
40- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
162C51
06/28/90
4,000.00
COMM /REV
SALES
TAX
50- 3357 - 001 -00
MANUAL
162C51
06/28/90
6,996.31
COMM /REV
SALES
TAX
50- 3357 - 001 -00
MANUAL
162C51
06/28/90
9,000.00
COMM /REV
SALES
TAX
50- 3357 - 002 -00
MANUAL
162C51
06/28/90
14,404.54
COMM /REV
SALES
TAX
50- 3357 - 002 -00
MANUAL
162C51
06/28/90
13,120.48
COMM /REV
SALES
TAX
50- 3357- 003 -00
MANUAL
162C51
06/28/90
9,000.00
COMM /REV
SALES
TAX
50- 3357- 003 -00
MANUAL
76,829.65 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
162F14
06/29/90
15,289.61
FIDELITY BANK
FICA
10- 4149 - 510 -51
MANUAL
162F14
06/29/90
829.65
FIDELITY BANK
MEDICARE
10- 4162 - 510 -51
MANUAL
16,119.26 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
162P32
06/29/90
26,036.59
P.E.R.A.
PERA
10- 4145 - 510 -51
MANUAL
26,036.59 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
163851
06/29/90
38.00
MN DNR
PERMIT
10- 4201- 358 -30
MANUAL
38.00 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
163EII
07/06/90
1.84-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163EII
07/06/90
12.50-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163EII
07/06/90
1.76-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163EII
07/06/90
.92-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
163EII
07/06/90
91.98
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163EII
07/06/90
625.00
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163E11
07/06/90
87.99
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163EII
07/06/90
45.99
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
163EII
06/28/90
136.40
EAGLE WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 862 -86
MANUAL
970.34
1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -30 -90 PAGE
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* * * * ** * ** -CKS
163E26
07/06/90
.64-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
163E26
07/06/90
6.38-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163E26
07/06/90
26.91-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
163E26
07/06/90
5.65-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
163E26
07/06/90
13.60-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
163E26
07/06/90
2.98-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
163E26
07/06/90
319.45
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163E26
07/06/90
32.30
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163E26
07/06/90
1,345.68
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
163E26
07/06/90
282.89
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163E26
07/06/90
149.39
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
163E26
07/06/90
680.15
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
163E26
07/06/90
201.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163E26
07/06/90
554.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163E26
07/06/90
127.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163E26
07/06/90
977.22
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163E26
07/06/90
119.35
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163E26
07/06/90
51.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628-842 -84
MANUAL
163E26
07/06/90
637.64
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163E26
07/06/90
253.45
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
163E26
07/06/90
759.65
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
163E26
07/06/90
761.30
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
163E26
07/06/90
207.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
163E26
06/28/90
35.00
ED PHILLIPS BEER
50- 4630- 842 -84
MANUAL
163E26
06/28/90
35.00
ED PHILLIPS BEER
50- 4630 - 862 -86
MANUAL
7,472.31
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
163G82
07/06/90
25.12-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163G82
07/06/90
13.47-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163G82
07/06/90
10.75-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163G82
07/06/90
16.72-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163G82
07/06/90
61.30-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 862 -86
MANUAL
163682
07/06/90
72.20-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 862 -86
MANUAL
163G82
07/06/90
20.08-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163682
07/06/90
2.98-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL'
163G82
07/06/90
1.45-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163G82
07/06/90
104.91-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163G82
07/06/90
5.27-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163G82
07/06/90
2.91-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163G82
07/06/90
13.65-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163G82
07/06/90
2.98-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
163G82
07/06/90
126.19-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
163G82
07/06/90
1,004.16
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
163G82
07/06/90
148.96
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163G82
07/06/90
72.39
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163G82
07/06/90
263.60
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163G82
06/28/90
66.32
GRIGGS COOPER LIQUOR
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163G82
07/06/90
145.48
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
163G82
07/06/90
5,179.03
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163G82
07/06/90
6,309.53
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
06 -30 -90 PAGE 5
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
163G82
07/06/90
148.96
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
163G82
07/06/90
.00
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163G82
07/06/90
.00
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163G82
07/06/90
.00
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163G82
07/06/90
682.65
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163G82
07/06/90
.00
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163G82
07/06/90
15.29-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
163G82
07/06/90
.00
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
163G82
07/06/90
.00
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
163G82
06/28/90
90.07
GRIGGS
COOPER MIX
50- 4630 - 842 -84
MANUAL
13,615.88
* * * * **
* * * -CKS
163J62
07/06/90
4.54-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
3.73-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
.21-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
2.12-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
.21
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
.21-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
16.37-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
.21
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
.21-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
8.72-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
16.86-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
90.86-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
3.74-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
7.08-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
7.49-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
4.75-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
85.66-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
5.43-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
3.43
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
818.34
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
436.10
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
4,542.23
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
28.91
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
2.94
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
4,282.49
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
25.97
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
20.00
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
20.50-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
8.33
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
373.52
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
455.00
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
4.41
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
20.50
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
5.39
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
20.50
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628-822 -82
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
212.43
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
20.00-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
1,688.49
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
17.13-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
7.35
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163J62
07/06/90
707.70
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK
REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV
163J62
07/06/90
19.60
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
163J62
07/06/90
374.11
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
163J62
07/06/90
20.09
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
163J62
07/06/90
542.15
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
163J62
07/06/90
475.72
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
163J62
07/06/90
10.29
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
163J62
07/06/90
14.21
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
163J62
07/06/90
750:16
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
163J62
07/06/90
6.86
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
163J62
07/06/90
16.94-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
163J62
06/28/90
77.44
JOHNSON WINE
BEER
50- 4630 - 842 -84
* * * * **
15,622.53
163P20
07/06/90
189.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
163P20
07/06/90
5.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
163P20
07/06/90
254.50
PAUSTIS & SONS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
163P20
07/06/90
5.60
PAUSTIS & SONS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
* * * * **
454.10
163P82
07/06/90
2.50-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
163P82
07/06/90
2.56-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
163P82
07/06/90
7.06-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
163P82
07/06/90
12.47-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
163P82
07/06/90
3.59-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
163P82
07/06/90
9.74-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
163P82
06/28/90
.09
PRIOR WINE
CREDIT
50- 4626 - 842 -84
163P82
06/28/90
.09-
PRIOR WINE
CREDIT
50- 4626- 842 -84
163P82
06/28/90
.09-
PRIOR WINE
CREDIT
50- 4626- 842 -84
163P82
07/06/90
125.09
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
163P82
07/06/90
127.95
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
163P82
07/06/90
352.77
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
163P82
07/06/90
623.74
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
163P82
07/06/90
179.68
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
163P82
07/06/90
486.96
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
163P82
06/28/90
36.21
PRIOR WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 822 -82
163P82
06/28/90
41.11
PRIOR WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
163P82
06/28/90
24.38
PRIOR WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 862 -86
* * * * **
1,959.88
163Q16
07/06/90
61.33-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3700 - 842 -84
163Q16
07/06/90
3.92-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
163Q16
07/06/90
3.11-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
163Q16
07/06/90
25.07-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
163Q16
07/06/90
16.18-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
163Q16
07/06/90
5.69-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
163Q16
07/06/90
15.24-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
163Q16
07/06/90
3.57-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
163Q16
07/06/90
.86-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
163Q16
07/06/90
.33-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
06 -30 -90 PAGE 6
# P.O. # MESSAGE
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL.
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK
REGISTER
06 -30 -90 PAGE 7
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
163Q16
07/06/90
4.03-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163Q16
07/06/90
76.85-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163Q16
07/06/90
101.76-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
163Q16
07/06/90
.88-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
163Q16
07/06/90
3.07-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
163Q16
07/06/90
11.10-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
163Q16
07/06/90
.99-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
163Q16
07/06/90
155.53
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163Q16
07/06/90
1,253.89
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
163Q16
07/06/90
178.55
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
163Q16
07/06/90
285.17
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163Q16
07/06/90
808.96
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163Q16
07/06/90
3,842.13
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163Q16
07/06/90
5,086.91
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
163Q16
07/06/90
554.92
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
163Q16
07/06/90
- 388.20
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
163Q16
07/06/90
.00
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163Q16
07/06/90
403.08
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163Q16
07/06/90
1,520.40
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163Q16
07/06/90
32.75
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163Q16
07/06/90
85.50
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163Q16
07/06/90
87.00
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
163Q16
07/06/90
98.00
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
163Q16
07/06/90
306.00
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
163Q16
06/28/90
56.18
QUALITY
WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
MANUAL
163Q16
06/28/90
.06
QUALITY
WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
MANUAL
14,809.25
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
163R69
06/29/90
670.00
KEN ROSLAND
CONFERENCE
10- 4206 - 140 -14
MANUAL
670.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
165B73
06/28/90
33.75
GC PETTY
CASH
POSTAGE
27- 1300 - 003 -00
MANUAL
165873
06/28/90
100.00
GC PETTY
CASH
REFUND
27- 3230 - 000 -00
MANUAL
165673
06/28/90
50.00
GC PETTY
CASH
REFUND
27- 3410 - 000 -00
MANUAL
165873
06/28/90
99.50
GC PETTY
CASH
TEMP SALARY
27- 4120 - 666 -66
MANUAL
165673
06/28/90
12.00
GC PETTY
CASH
MEETING
27- 4202 - 661 -66
MANUAL
165B73
06/28/90
25.00
GC PETTY
CASH
ASSOC DUES
27- 4204 - 661 -66
MANUAL
165B73
06/28/90
18.50
GC PETTY
CASH
VAC REPAIRS
27- 4248 - 662 -66
MANUAL
165673
06/28/90
107.20
GC PETTY
CASH
GENERAL SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 661 -66
MANUAL
165873
06/28/90
66.11
GC PETTY
CASH
GENERAL SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 662 -66
MANUAL
165873
06/28/90
7.30
GC PETTY
CASH
GENERAL SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 663 -66
MANUAL
165873
06/28/90
73.91
GC PETTY
CASH
GENERAL SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 664 -66
MANUAL
165873
06/28/90
26.20
GC PETTY
CASH
CLEANING SUPPLYS
27- 4512 - 663 -66
MANUAL
165873
06/28/90
57.19
GC PETTY
CASH
FOOD /RESALE
27- 4624 - 663 -66
MANUAL
676.66
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
166U27
06/29/90
216.78
US WEST
COMM
PHONE
10- 4256- 436 -42
MANUAL
166U27
06/29/90
423.31
US WEST
COMM
PHONE
10- 4256 - 510 -51
MANUAL
166U27
06/29/90
248.18
US.WEST
COMM
PHONE
10- 4256 - 622 -62
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK
REGISTER
06 -30 -90 PAGE 8
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
166U27
06/29/90
20.11
US WEST COMM
PHONE
10- 4256 - 628 -62
MANUAL
166U27
06/29/90
94.28
US WEST COMM
PHONE
10- 4256 - 646 -64
MANUAL
166U27
06/29/90
32.12
US WEST COMM
PHONE
23- 4256 - 612 -61
MANUAL
166U27
06/29/90
387.66
US WEST COMM
PHONE
27- 4256 - 662 -66
MANUAL
166U27
06/29/90
71.55
US WEST COMM
PHONE
27- 4256 - 664 -66
MANUAL
166U27
06/29/90
178.54
US WEST COMM
PHONE
28- 4256 - 702 -70
MANUAL
166U27
06/29/90
49.62
US WEST COMM
PHONE
29- 4256 - 722 -72
MANUAL
166U27
06/29/90
521.04
US WEST COMM
PHONE
40- 4256 - 803 -80
MANUAL
166U27
06/29/90
16.06
US WEST COMM
PHONE
50- 4256 - 821 -82
_ MANUAL
166U27
06/29/90
16.06
US WEST COMM
PHONE
50- 4256 - 841 -84
MANUAL
166U27
06/29/90
16.06
US WEST COMM
PHONE
50- 4256 - 861 -86
MANUAL
2,291.37
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
169A82
06/29/90
14.38
AT &T
PHONE
10- 4256 - 510 -51
MANUAL
169A82
06/29/90
6.45
AT &T
PHONE
10- 4256- 622 -62
MANUAL
169A82
06/29/90
6.24
AT &T'
PHONE
23- 4256 - 612 -61
MANUAL
169A82
06/29/90
18.38
AT &T
PHONE
27- 4256 - 662 -66
MANUAL
169A82
06/29/90
9.67
AT &T
PHONE
27- 4256 - 664 -66
MANUAL
169A82
.06/29/90
8.09
AT &T
PHONE
28- 4256 - 702 -70
MANUAL
169A82
06/29/90
.41
AT &T
PHONE
29- 4256 - 721 -72
MANUAL
169A82
06/29/90
2.30
AT &T
PHONE
40- 4256 - 803 -80
MANUAL
169A82
06/29/90
.85
AT &T
PHONE
50- 4256 - 821 -82
MANUAL
169A82
06/29/90
3.64
AT &T
PHONE
50- 4256 - 841 -84
MANUAL
70.41 *
169A83
06/29/90
96.29
AT &T
PHONE
10- 4256- 510 -51
MANUAL
169A83
06/29/90
57.49
AT &T
PHONE
23- 4256 - 612 -61
MANUAL
153.78 *
169A84
06/29/90
10.50
AT &T
PHONE
40- 4256 - 801 -80
MANUAL
169A84
06/29/90
21.00
AT &T
PHONE
50- 4256 - 861 -86
MANUAL
31.50 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
170738
06/29/90
27.00
E MACHOLDA
CHANGE FUND
26- 1040 - 000 -00
MANUAL
27.00 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
170E11
07/06/90
1.72-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
170E11
07/06/90
10.67-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
170EII
07/06/90
1.84-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
170EII
07/06/90
10.11-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
170E11
07/06/90
30.29-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
170EII
07/06/90
14.36-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
170EII
07/06/90
86.00
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
170EII
07/06/90
533.50
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
170EII
07/06/90
505.43
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
170EII
07/06/90
91.98
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
170EII
07/06/90
688.44
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
170EII
07/06/90
1,514.65
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
170EII
06/28/90
17.04
EAGLE WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 862 -86
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
06 -30 -90 PAGE 9
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
3,368.05-*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
170E26
07/06/90
11.86-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
170E26
07/06/90
24.88-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
170E26
07/06/90
2.73-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
170E26
07/06/90
43.04-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
170E26
07/06/90
1.62-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
170E26
07/06/90
593.41
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
170E26
07/06/90
1,244.02
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
170E26
07/06/90
136.89
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
170E26
07/06/90
2,152.26
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
170E26
07/06/90
81.40
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
170E26
07/06/90
519.30
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
170E26
07/06/90
362.70
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
170E26
07/06/90
289.74
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
170E26
07/.06/90
1,340.30
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
170E26
07/06/90
462.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
170E26
07/06/90
1,181.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
170E26
07/06/90
957.80
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
170E26
07/06/90
290.95
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
170E26
07/06/90
1,504.90
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628-862 -86
MANUAL
11,032.54
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
170G82
07/06/90
14.94-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 822 -82
MANUAL
170G82
07/06/90
31.57-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 842 -84
MANUAL
170G82
07/06/90
57.09-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 862 -86
MANUAL
170G82
07/06/90
60.26-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
170G82
07/06/90
16.98-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
170G82
07/06/90
74.97-
GRIGGS COOPER
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
170G82
07/06/90
56.07-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
170G82
07/06/90
3,012.95
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
170G82
07/06/90
72.39
GRIGGS COOPER
50 -4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
170G82
07/06/90
848.75
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
170G82
07/06/90
3,748.32
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
170G82
07/06/90
72.39-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
170682
07/06/90
72.39-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
170G82
06/28/90
74.52
GRIGGS COOPER LIQUOR
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
170G82
07/06/90
2,728.73
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
170G82
07/06/90
.00
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
170G82
07/06/90
34.70-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
170G82
07/06/90
80.84-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
170G82
07/06/90
.00
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
170G82
07/06/90
.00
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
9,913.46
****A*
* ** -CKS
170J62
07/06/90
1.62-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
170J62
07/06/90
2.51-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
170J62
07/06/90
43.34-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
170J62
07/06/90
3.33-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -30 -90 PAGE 10
CHECK NO. DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.0
170J62
07/06/90
2.37-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
170J62
07/06/90
2.70-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
170J62
07/06/90
2.32-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
170J62
07/06/90
5.21-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
170J62
07/06/90
40.80-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
170J62
07/06/90
39.08-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
170J62
07/06/90
8.01-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
170J62
07/06/90
5.28-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
170J62
07/06/90
2.53-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
170J62
07/06/90
3.65-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
170J62
07/06/90
12.26
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626- 822 -82
170J62
07/06/90
2,168.14
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
170J62
07/06/90
114.36-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
170J62
07/06/90
9.80
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
170J62
07/06/90
2,000.29
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
170J62
07/06/90
1,954.06
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
170J62
07/06/90
8.82
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
170J62
07/06/9.0
4.41
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
170J62
07/06/90
252.11
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
170J62
07/06/90
162.77
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
170J62
07/06/90
3.43
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
170J62
07/06/90
333.02
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
170J62
07/06/90
6.86
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
17CJ62
07/06/90
1.47
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
170J62
07/06/90
3.58-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
170J62
07/06/90
6.86
- JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
170J62
07/06/90
2.45
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
170J62
07/06/90
237.42
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
170J62
07/06/90
79.14
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
170J62
07/06/90
231.15
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
170J62
07/06/90
270.27
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
170J62
07/06/90
15.19
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
170J62
07/06/90
519.86
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
170J62
07/06/90
800.77
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
170J62
07/06/90
253.50
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
170J62
07/06/90
2.21
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
170J62
07/06/90
6.37
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
170J62
07/06/90
14.21
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
170J62
07/06/90
3.93-
JOHNSON.WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
170J62
07/06/90
528.16
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
170J62
07/06/90
8.82
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
170J62
07/06/90
364.14
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
9,973.34
* * * * **
170P20
07/06/90
44.50
PAUSTIS
& SONS
50- 4628- 862 -86
44.50
170P70
06/29/90
175.00
POSTMASTER POSTAGE
10- 4290 - 510 -51
175.00
# MESSAGE
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
i70P82
07/06/90
170P82
07/06/90
170P82
07/06/90
170P82
07/06/90
170P82
07/06/90
170P82
07/06/90
170P82
07/06/90
170P82
07/06/90
170P82
07/06/90
170P82
07/06/90
170P82
07/06/90
170P82
07/06/90
* * * * **
170Q16
07/06/90
170Q16
07/06/90
170Q16
07/06/90
170Q16
07/06/90
170Q16
07/06/90
170Q16
07/06/90
170Q16
07/06/90
170Q16
07/06/90
170Q16
07/06/90
170Q16
07/06/90
170Q16
07/06/90
170Q16
07/06/90
170Q16
07/06/90
170Q16
07/06/90
170Q16
06/28/90
* * * * **
170T22
07/06/90
* * * * **
171M71
06/29/90
* * * * **
173C33
06/29/90
173C33
06/29/90
176F14
06/29/90
176F14
06/29/90
AMOUNT
3.26 -
3.48-
2.05-
4.73-
8.23-
2.23-
174.08
162.80
236.25
102.36
411.58
111.62
1.174.71
.98
28.31 -
4.01-
30.35-
13.32-
38.62-
15.66-
1,415.17
1,517.14
1,930.84
97.65-
398.60
1,330.60
1,559.89
.01
7,925.31
157.20
157.20
406.21
406.21
50,000.00
50,000.00-
.00
15,956.25
1,011.72
16,967.97
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
PRIOR WINE
PRIOR WINE
PRIOR WINE
PRIOR WINE
PRIOR WINE
PRIOR WINE
PRIOR WINE
PRIOR WINE
PRIOR WINE
PRIOR WINE
PRIOR WINE
PRIOR WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
THE WINE COMPANY
MN DEPT /JOBS
CITY /EDINA
CITY /EDINA
FIDELITY BANK
FIDELITY BANK
MIX
UNEMPL COMP
PAYROLL TRANSFER
PAYROLL TRANSFER
FICA
INSURANCE
i
06 -30 -90 PAGE 11
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50-3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86-
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862-86
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4632 - 842 -84
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4156 - 510 -51 MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50- 1010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
50- 1010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4149 - 510 -51
MANUAL
10- 4162 - 510 -51
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK
REGISTER
06 -30 -90 PAGE 12
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** * **
* ** -CKS
177666
07/06/90
1.86-
BRW ENTERPRISE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177666
07/06/90 .
1.18-
BRW ENTERPRISE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177866
07/06/90
124.60
BRW ENTERPRISE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
177866
07/06/90
78.60
BRW ENTERPRISE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
200.16
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
177EII
07/06/90
4.24-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177EII
07/06/90
11.81-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
177EII
07/06/90
20.92-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
177EII
07/06/90
.92-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177EII
07/06/90
211.91
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177E11
07/06/90
590.61
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177E11
07/06/90
1,046.01
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177EII
07/06/90
45.99
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177EII
06/28/90
18.58
EAGLE WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177EII
06/28/90
72.47
EAGLE WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177EII
06/28/90
52.67
EAGLE WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 862 -86
MANUAL
2,000.35
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
177E26
07/06/90
25.93-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177E26
07/06/90
.38-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177E26
07/06/90
1.44-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177E26
07/06/90
31.57-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
177E26
07/06/90
7.22-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177E26
07/06/90
19.39
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177E26
07/06/90
1,296.66
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177E26
07/06/90
1,578.99
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177E26
07/06/90
72.29
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177E26
07/06/90
361.04
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177E26
07/06/90
36.74-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
177E26
07/06/90
1,098.14
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628-822 -82
MANUAL
177E26
07/06/90
449.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177E26
07/06/90
498.74
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177E26
07/06/90
770.65
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177E26
07/06/90
100.70
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177E26
07/06/90
380.90
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177E26
07/06/90
61.31
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177E26
07/06/90
144.10
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177E26
07/06/90
594.15
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177E26
07/06/90
940.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
177E26
07/06/90
1,278.84
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177E26
06/28/90
186.00
ED PHILLIPS
BEER
50- 4630 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177E26
06/28/90
33.90
ED PHILLIPS
BEER
50- 4630- 862 -86
MANUAL
9,761.52
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
177G82
07/06/90
29.11-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 822 -82
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
06 -30 -90 PAGE 13
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
177G82
07/06/90
3.09-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3700 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177G82
07/06/90
17.15-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177G82
07/06/90
17.50-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177G82
07/06/90
109.06-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177682
07/06/90
12.00-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177G82
07/06/90
47.92-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177G82
07/06/90
61.67-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
177G82
07/06/90
857.40
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177682
07/06/90
875.23
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177G82
07/06/90
600.18
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177G82
07/06/90
5,453.23
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177G82
07/06/90
3,083.66
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177682
07/06/90
2,396.15
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177G82
07/06/90
.00
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
177G82
07/06/90
.00
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
12,968.35
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
177G86
06/29/90
13,921.77
GROUP HEALTH
INSURANCE
10- 4156- 510 -51
MANUAL
13,921.77
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
177J62
07/06/90
.75-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3700 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
8.50-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3700 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
5.50-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3700 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
.85-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
2.37-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
37.79-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
8.92-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
2.90-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
17.07-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
8.18-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
9.28-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
125.74-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
6.44-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
2.75-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
4.26-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
6.03-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
76.46-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
5.10-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
8.33
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
1,888.69
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
41.16
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
6,286.67
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
17.89
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
3,822.96
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
8.33
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
237.42
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
1.47
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
85.40
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
.00
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
4.29-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
289.37
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
06 -30 -90 PAGE 14
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
177J62
07/06/90
7.84
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
893.40
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
2.45
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
17.15
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
38.71
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
9.31
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
929.53
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
.00
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
8.33
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
817.65
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
1,703.41
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
644.50
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
509.90
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
16.66
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862-86
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
275.35
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
5.88
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
427.14
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
4.90
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
6.86
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
.00
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
601.17
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177J62
07/06/90
4.12-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
19,270.53 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
177M24
06/29/90
17,108.40
MEDCEMTER HEALTH
INSURANCE
10- 4156 - 510 -51
MANUAL
17,108.40 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
177P20
07/06/90
108.75
PAUSTIS
& SONS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177P20
07/06/90
3.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
177P20
07/06/90
107.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177P20
07/06/90
3.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177P20
07/06/90
234.95
PAUSTIS
& SONS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177P20
07/06/90
6.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
462.70 *.
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
177P32
06/29/90
26,762.35
P.E.R.A.
PERA
10- 4145 - 510 -51
MANUAL
26,762.35 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
177P42
06/29/90
21,676.50
PHP
INSURANCE
10- 4156- 510 -51
MANUAL
21,676.50 *
* * * * **
* *" -CKS
177P82
07/06/90
1.73-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177P82
07/06/90
3.11-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177P82
07/06/90
9,86-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177P82
07/06/90
4.46-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK
REGISTER
06 -30 -90 PAGE 15
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
177P82
07/06/90
8.05-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177P82
07/06/90
2.70-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177P82
07/06/90
86.26
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177P82
07/06/90
155.73
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177P82
07/06/90
222.85
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177P82
07/06/90
492.78
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177P82
07/06/90
134.95
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177P82
07/06/90
402.37
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177P82
06/28/90
24.38
PRIOR WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
MANUAL
1,489.41
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
177Q16
07/06/90
.33-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177Q16
07/06/90
5.58-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177Q16
07/06/90
2.44-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
177Q16
07/06/90
17.68-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177Q16
07/06/90
13.54-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177Q16
07/06/90
1.34-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177Q16
07/06/90
14.92-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177Q16
07/06/90
2.29-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177Q16
07/06/90
127.06-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177Q16
07/06/90
.24
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177Q16
07/06/90
.65-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177Q16
07/06/90
2.44 -
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177Q16
07/06/90
12.38-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
177Q16
07/06/90
121.93
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
177Q16
07/06/90
884.12
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177Q16
07/06/90
676.85
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177Q16
07/06/90
6,352.59
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177Q16
07/06/90
121.93
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177Q16
07/06/90
32.75
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177Q16
07/06/90
555.45
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
177Q16
07/06/90
1,488.00
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177Q16
07/06/90
228.00
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177Q16
07/06/90
134.00
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
177Q16
07/06/90
1,232.75
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
177Q16
07/06/90
65.00
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177Q16
07/06/90
12.18-
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
177Q16
06/28/90
.05
QUALITY WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
MANUAL
11,680.83
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
178U27
06/29/90
66.41
US WEST COMM
PHONE
10- 4256 - 436 -42
MANUAL
178U27
06/29/90
335.93
US WEST COMM
PHONE
10- 4256 - 510 -51
MANUAL
178U27
06/29/90
215.36
US WEST COMM
PHONE
10- 4256- 622 -62
MANUAL
178U27
06/29/90
76.26
US WEST COMM
PHONE
10- 4256 - 646 -64
MANUAL
178U27
06/29/90
93.83
US WEST COMM
PHONE
27- 4256 - 662 -66
MANUAL
178U27
06/29/90
129.87
US WEST COMM
PHONE
27- 4256 - 667 -66
MANUAL
178U27
06/29/90
99.00
US WEST COMM
PHONE
28- 4256 - 702 -70
MANUAL
178U27
06/29/90
237.71
US WEST COMM
PHONE
30- 4256- 782 -78
MANUAL
178U27
06/29/90
241.49
US WEST COMM
PHONE
30- 4256 - 784 -78
MANUAL
178U27
06/29/90
165.20
US WEST COMM
PHONE
50- 4256 - 841 -84
MANUAL
1,661.06
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
* * * * **
18OF14
07/06/90
18OF14
07/06/90
* * * * **
18OM68
07/06/90
* * * * **
18OP70
180P70
* * * * **
183L04
* * * * **
184EIl
184EIl
184EII
184EII
184EII
184EII
184EII
* * * * **
184E26
184E26
184E26
184E26
184E26
184E26
184E26
184E26
184E26
184E26
184E26
184E26
184E26
184E26
184E26
184E26
184E26
184E26
184E26
07/06/90
07/06/90
06/29/90
AMOUNT
8.17
140.63
148.80 *
794.00
794.00 *
2,233.92
72.24
2,306.16 *
526.60
526.60 *
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
FIDELITY BANK
FIDELITY BANK
MN CELLULAR 1
POSTMASTER
POSTMASTER
LAHASS
07/06/90
8.03-
EAGLE WINE
07/06/90
45.74-
EAGLE WINE
07/06/90
24.70-
EAGLE WINE
07/06/90
401.57
EAGLE WINE
07/06/90
2,287.04
EAGLE WINE
07/06/90
1,234.95
EAGLE WINE
07/06/90
88.00
EAGLE WINE
MANUAL
3,933.09
MANUAL
07/06/90
4.69-
ED PHILLIPS
07/06/90
3.20-
ED PHILLIPS
07/06/90
28.50-
ED PHILLIPS
07/06/90
15.24-
ED PHILLIPS
07/06/90
234.94
ED PHILLIPS
07/06/90
1,425.46
ED PHILLIPS '
07/06/90
160.25
ED PHILLIPS
07/06/90
762.36
ED PHILLIPS
07/06/90
1,195.45
ED PHILLIPS
07/06/90
601.78
ED PHILLIPS
07/06/90
315.95
ED PHILLIPS
07/06/90
889.90
ED PHILLIPS
07/06/90
23.05
ED PHILLIPS
07/06/90
63.50
ED PHILLIPS
07/06/90 1,657.60 —
- fi6s.se
ED PHILLIPS
07/06/90
1,990.84
ED PHILLIPS
07/06/90
3,985.60
ED PHILLIPS
07/06/90
579.65
ED PHILLIPS
07/06/90
1,832.65
ED PHILLIPS
FICA
MEDICARE
CAR PHONE
BULK MAILING
POSTAGE
REPAIR PARTS
MIX
06 -30 -90 PAGE 16
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
10- 4149 - 510 -51 MANUAL
10- 4162 - 510 -51 MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 436 -42 MANUAL
* ** -CKS
12- 4215 - 434 -43 MANUAL
27- 4290 - 661 -66 MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56 MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84_
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4632- 862 -86
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822-82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
06 -30 -90 PAGE 17
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
184E26
07/06/90
883.54
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
184E26
07/06/90
75.00
ED PHILLIPS MIX
50- 4632 - 862 -86
MANUAL
184E26
07/06/90
24.00
6
ED PHILLIPS MIX
50- 4632 - 862 -86
MANUAL
* * * * **
16,649.89*
* * * -CKS
184G82
.07/06/90
23.60-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3700 - 842 -84
MANUAL
184G82
07/06/90
2.64-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
184G82
07/06/90
99.35-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
184G82
07/06/90
129.96-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
184G82
07/06/90
21.95-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
184682
07/06/90
2.64-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
•184G82
07/06/90
5.27-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
184G82
07/06/90
50.60-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
184G82
07/06/90
131.80
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
184G82
07/06/90
4,967.55
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
184G82
07/06/90
6,498.03
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
184G82
07/06/90
131.80
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
184G82
07/06/90
1,097.30
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
184682
07/06/90
2,529.84
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
184G82
07/06/90
263.60
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
184G82
07/06/90
7.14-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
184G82
07/06/90
4.50-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
184G82
07/06/90
.00
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
184G82
07/06/90
12.09-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
15,260.18
* * * * **
* * * -CKS
184J62
07/06/90
3.20-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
2.84-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
42.11-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
5.02-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
4.52-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
7.81-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
130.43-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
7.37-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
.74-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
17.98-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
42.20-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
7.21-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
4.27-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
1.10-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
2,105.98
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
12.50
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
38.47
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
6,521.44
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
2,110.50
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
11.27
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
451.70
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
20.78-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
7.84
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
12.25
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
320.17
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
06 -30 -90 PAGE 18
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
184J62
07/06/90
3.92
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
6.37
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628-822 -82
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
285.07
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
502.58
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
1,798.89
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
18.13
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
737.96
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
781.28
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
19.11
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
73.75
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
2.45
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
20.58
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
720.48
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
110.66
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
19.11
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
426.74
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
1.47
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
184J62
07/06/90
9.31
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
16,832.40
... * **
* ** -CKS
184P82
07/06/90
4.46-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
184P82
07/06/90
2.88-
PRIOR WINE
50 =3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
184P82
07/06/90
16.06-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
184P82
07/06/90
17.90-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
184P82
07/06/90
7.57-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
184P82
07/06/90
6.51-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
184P82
07/06/90
223.24
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
184P82
07/06/90
19.95
PRIOR WINE WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
184P82
07/06/90
123.88
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
184P82
07/06/90
803.21
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
184P82
07/06/90
895.15
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
184P82
07/06/90
325.60
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
184P82
07/06/90
378.67
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
184P82
07/06/90
57.33
PRIOR WINE MIX
50- 4632- 822 -82
MANUAL
2,771.65
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
184Q16
07/06/90
1.63-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
184Q16
07/06/90
53.87-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
184Q16
07/06/90
5.98-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
184Q16
07/06/90
1.57-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
184Q16
07/06/90
1.91-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
184Q16
07/06/90
25.44-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
184Q16
07/06/90
85.30-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
184Q16
07/06/90
8.63-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
184Q16
07/06/90
55.35-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
184Q16
07/06/90
1.03
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
184Q16
07/06/90
21.72-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
184Q16
07/06/90
2,694.17
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
184Q16
07/06/90
78.53
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
184Q16
07/06/90
431.46
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
184Q16
07/06/90
4,266.14
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
. ' ' 4
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
184Qi6
07/06/90
184Q16
07/06/90
184Q16
07/06/90
184Q16
07/06/90
184Q16
07/06/90
184Q16
07/06/90
184Q16
07/06/90
184Q16
07/06/90
184Q16
07/06/90
184T22 07/06/90
* * * * **
286,556.59
784,361.63*
AMOUNT
.08
95.63
2,768.25
163.25
594.25
2,538.25
2,164.75
102.54-
.03
15,431.88
81.00
81.00
413,954.34
2,233.92
1,783.00
632.39
22,872.50
13,627.85
498.93
11,479.03
30,248.67
474.41
784,369.59-
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE MIX
THE WINE COMPANY
FUND
10
TOTAL
FUND
12
TOTAL
FUND
23
TOTAL
FUND
26
TOTAL
FUND
27
TOTAL
FUND
28
TOTAL
FUND
29
TOTAL
FUND
30
TOTAL
FUND
40
TOTAL
FUND
41
TOTAL
FUND
50
TOTAL
TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
COMMUNICATIONS
ART CENTER
SWIMMING POOL FUND
GOLF COURSE FUND
RECREATION CENTER FUND
GUN RANGE FUND
EDINBOROUGH PARK
UTILITY FUND
STORM SEWER UTILITY
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
06 -30 -90 PAGE 19
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628-822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4632 - 842 -84
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL
* ** -CKS