HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-09-04_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
SEPTEMBER 4, 1990
ROLLCALL
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA MEETING OF AUGUST 20, 1990
II. ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
PROCLAMATIONS - Constitution Week
- Edina Historical Museum
I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *)
and in bold print are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one
motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Council
Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will'be removed from the
consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda.
* II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of Regular Meeting of August 6, 1990
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If
Council wishes to proceed, action by resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote
of all- members of Council required to pass if improvement has been.petitioned
for; 4/5 favorable rollcall vote required if no petition.
A. Concrete Alley Paving Improvement No. E -32 - Alley between Oxford Avenue
and Bedford Avenue South of 51st Street (Contd from 8/20/90)
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing.
Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote
of all members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property
Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass.
A. Preliminary Plat Approval for Lindell Addition - Steven Lindell - 7017
Antrim Road (Contd from 8/20/90)
B. Preliminary Rezoning from Planned Industrial District to PCD -2 Planned
Commercial District - Jerry's Enterprises /Opus - Generally located south
of Eden Avenue and west of Soo Line railroad tracks (Contd from 8/20/90)
* C. CDBG Sub - Recipient Agreement
D. Set Hearing Date (9/17/90)
* 1. Amendment to Customary Home Occupations Section of Zoning Ordinance
No. 825, Section 7.D.
* 2. Preliminary Plat Approval - Belfry Addition - Lot 56, Morningside -
4243 Grimes Avenue
* 3. Preliminary Plat Approval - Farrells Parkwood Knolls - 5700 Blake Rd
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON VACATION OF EASEMENTS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If
Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote
required to pass.
A. Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easements - Lots 1,2,3,4 and 5, Block 1,
Interlachen Hills 3rd Addition
B. Vacation of Easements for Public Park Lands, Open Space and Storm Water
Pond and Holding Area - Part of Outlot A, Interlachen Hills 3rd Addition
C. Vacation of Easements for Utility Purposes - Tract J, R.L.S. 629 -
(Galleria)
Agenda
Edina City Council
September 4, 1990
Page 2,
VI. ORDINANCES First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second
Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of all members of Council
required to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of
all members of Council required to pass.
A. Second Readin
1. Ordinance No. 715 -A1 - To Provide Mandatory Separation and Storage of
Recyclables from Planned Residence Districts and Mixed Development
Districts in the City
2. Ordinance No. 1301 -A5 - To Require Garbage and Recycling Haulers to
Offer Recyclable Collection Service and to Provide Recycling Reports
VII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
VIII. AWARD OF BIDS
* A. Cahill Interpretive Site
* B. Pamela Park Playground Equipment
* C. York Park Playground Equipment
* D. Streetscape Improvements Phase I, Lighting and Demolition and Removals -
50th and France Business District
* E. Energy Management System - Edinborough Park
IX. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Resolution - Recycling Funding Policy for Multifamily Housing
B. Request of Edina School District for Rebate of Excess Tax Increments
(Contd from 8/6/90)
C. Feasibility Report - Tree Trimming Improvement - Country Club District -
Set Hearing Date (1/1/90)
D. Report on New Tax Increment Districts - Pete Meyers
E: Request for Quit Claim Deed - Lot 1 and Part of Lot 2, Block 2,
Interlachen Hills 3rd Addition
* F. Approval of Temporary On -Sale Liquor License - Edinamite
X. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
XI. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
XII. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
A. Council Meetings with Advisory Boards /Commissions
B. Format for Petitions
C. Fees and Charges
XIII. FINANCE
* A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 09/04/90: Total $521,114.99
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Tues
Sept
11
PRIMARY
ELECTION
Polls open 7
a.m. - 8
p.m.
Mon
Sept
17
Regular
Council Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council
Room
Sun
Sept
23
Dedication of Edina Historical Museum
2:00
p.m.
Arneson
Park
Mon
Oct
1
Regular
Council Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council
Room
Mon
Oct
15
Regular
Council Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council
Room
MINUTES
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
AUGUST 20, 1990
Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Paulus, Rice and Smith. Commissioner
Kelly chaired the meeting.
MINUTES of the HRA Meeting of August 6, 1990, were approved as submitted by motion
of Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Rice.
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, motion of Commissioner Paulus
was seconded by Commissioner Rice for adjournment.
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Motion carried.
Executive Director
Cn
y
\CSR PORp`1�/
1888
P R O C L A M A T I O N
WHEREAS, our Founding Fatheu, in onden to aecu&e the 6te,6.6 inga oS
t i.benty bon themaekves and their poaten i ty, did. ordain and eatabtizh
a Con6titution bon the United Staten o6 Amehica; and
WHEREAS, it Z6 ob the gneateat .cmpoht that att citi.zena 6uity undeA-
atand the pnov.cz on6 and pni.ncipQed contained in the Constitution in
order to auppont it, pneaenve it and defend it again,6t encAoachment;
and
WHEREAS, the two hundreed thi d anniveuany of the e.igning of the
Con.6ti tution pnov.idea an Wton,i.c opportunity 4on aft Ameni.cana to
teann about and necatt ac.hi.evementa of our Foundeu, and to ne6tect
on the ni.gW and pAi.vitegea o6 citizenship, as weft as it.6 attendant
�xeapon.6ibZ&:tiea; and
WHEREAS, the independence guatanteed to the American people by the
Constitution ahoued be cee.ebnated by appnop&iate cenemoni.ea and
activitiea du ing Con t tut,i.on Week, SeptembeA 17 .through 23, as
dea.ignated by pnoceamation ob the Pnea.ident o6 the United Staten o6
Amen i.ca in accordance with Pubti.c Law 915; ,
NOW, THEREFORE; I, FnedeAi.ck S. R.ichaAda, by vi tue o6 the authot ty
vested in me as Mayon o4 the City o6 Edina in the State o6 M.i.nnuota
do heAeby pnoc rim the week ob September 17 through 23 aA
CONSTITUTION WEEK
in the City o6 Edina., and urge aU our citizens to pay 6peciat at-
tention du, i.ng that week to our Fedeut Conatituti.on and the advantage
o j Amen i.can Ci t i.z ens h ip.
WITNESS my hand and the a ea,E' o6 the City o6 Edina th.i.a 4th day o6
September, 1990.
re eAic ar
Mayon
A
ow e =S
�e�le
PROCLAMATION
1, Fneden i ck S. RichaAd,6 , hereby pnoc t im that Sunday, the twenty -thixd
day o6 September, in the yea). Nineteen Hundred and Ninety be set aside
to honor out p.ioneming 6one6atheu whose 6onezight and p.eanning us
nespona.ibZe bon the quaR.i ty o6 t i6e in Edina today.
In thedc honors, on thi6 day we dedicate the new
EDINA HISTORICAL MUSEUM
whose mizzion .cis to pteseAve Edina'd hiztony bon EdZna.'.s 6ututce.
PROCLAIMED thin 4th day o6 SeptembeA, 1990.
F,%edeAick S. Ric an
Mayon
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
AUGUST 6,1990
ROLI.CALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor
Richards.
DAYTON'S SOUTHDALE GRAND OPENING DAY PROCLAIMED Notion of Member Kelly was
seconded by Member Smith for adoption of the following proclamation:
PROCLAMATION - DAYTON'S SOUTHDALE GRAND OPENING
WHEREAS, in 1891, Joseph Hudson built an eight - story, full -line department store
in Detroit, Michigan; and
WHEREAS, in 1902, George D. Dayton built a six- story, multi -use building on the
corner of Nicollet and 7th Street in Minneapolis, Minnesota, which housed
Goodfellow's Dry Goods; and
WHEREAS, in 1903, Mr. Dayton bought out Goodfellow's and changed the corporate
name to Dayton Dry Goods Company, officially becoming The Dayton Company in 1910;
and
WHEREAS, in 1956, Dayton's Southdale Store opened in the first fully enclosed,
climate - controlled shopping center in the United States, located in Edina,
Minnesota; and e
WHEREAS, in 1969, the J.L. Hudson Company and The Dayton Corporation merged to
create The Dayton Hudson Corporation, which in 1984 resulted in the formation of
the Dayton Hudson Department Store Company; and
WHEREAS, this decade will see Dayton's ushering in a new era in customer service
with the opening of a new Southdale Store.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Thursday, August 9, 1990, be recognised as the
Grand Opening of the new Dayton's at Southdale - -a four- level, 370,000 square foot
store which has been designed with two primary goals in mind: ease of shopping and
an ambiance which reflects an understated elegance and warmth.
FURTHERMORE, with the commitment to construct the new store in the City of Edina,
this exemplifies the strong public- private partnership between the City of Edina
and Dayton's with Southdale continuing to be one of the premiere shopping centers
in the country:
NOW THEREFORE, I, Frederick S. Richards, Mayor of the City of Edina, do hereby
proclaim August 9, 1990, as
"DAYTON'S GRAND OPENING DAY"
in the City of Edina.
Motion carried unanimously.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Notion
Member Kelly to approve and adopt th e
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith,
Motion carried.
was made by Member Smith and was seconded by
consent agenda items as presented.
Richards
*MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 16, 1990 APPROVED Notion was made by Member
Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly to approve the minutes of the regular
meeting of July 16, 1990.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. _
*EXTENSION TO SEPTEMBER 4. 1990 FOR ENFORCEMENT OF HOME OCCUPATION ZONING
ORDINANCE - DR. JOYCE ANDERSON, 7171 GLOUCHESTER Notion was made by Member Smith
ki
and was seconded by Member Kelly to delay enforcement of the home occupation
zoning ordinance for Dr. Joyce Anderson, 7171 Glouchester, until September 4,
1990.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*HEARING DATE OF 8/20/90 SET FOR PLANNING MATTERS Motion was made by Member Smith
and was seconded by Member Kelly setting August 20, 1990, as hearing date for the
following Planning matters:
1) Preliminary Plat Approval for Lindell Addition - Steven Lindell - 7017 Antrim
Road
2) Preliminary Rezoning - Planned Industrial District to PCD -1, Planned
Commercial District - Jerry's Enterprises /Opus - Generally located south of
Eden Avenue and vest of Soo Line railroad tracks
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
ORDINANCE NO. 312 -A2 (TO DECLARE CERTAIN ANIMAL NOISES TO BE A PUBLIC NUISANCE)
ADOPTED ON SECOND READING Member Paulus made a motion to grant Second Reading and
adoption of Ordinance 312 -A2 as follows:.
ORDINANCE NO. 312 -A2
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 312
TO DECLARE CERTAIN ANIMAL NOISES TO BE A PUBLIC NUISANCE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Sec. 29.(j) of Ordinance No. 312 is hereby amended to read as
follows:
(j) No person owning, operating, having charge of, or occupying, any building
or premise shall keep or allow to be kept, any animal.which shall, by any
noise, unreasonably disturb the peace and quiet of any person in the
vicinity. .
The phrase "unreasonably disturb the peace and quiet" shall include, but is
not limited to, the creation of any noise by any animal which can be heard by
any person, including a law enforcement officer or animal control officer,
from a location outside of the building or premises where the animal is being
kept and which animal noise occurs repeatedly over at least a five - minute
period of time with one minute or less lapse of time between each animal
noise during the five minute period."
Sec: 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its
passage and publication:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Smith.
Member Rice inquired of Police Chief Swanson the number of hours it would take to
bring the process of notification to the resident about the animal noises in
question. Chief Swanson stated the process of mailing and documentation is
estimated at under three hours.
Roger Dreher of 1 Spur Road explained that, because of a citation issued to him a
year ago about his dog, this Ordinance is before the Council now. Mr. Dreher
pointed out some highlights from the information he had submitted to the Council.
Extensive research shows that addressing the willfulness of the violation, the
sensibility of the complaining party, a reasonable duration of the alleged
disturbance and adding elements of time of day and volume of the disturbance will
result in a constitutional and fair ordinance. Mr. Dreher added to not address
these issues would perhaps result in an increase in prosecution expenses with more
people going to-Court than merely paying the fine. He complimented the procedure
as a good start, but suggested there be a longer waiting period between the
citation and issuance of a violation. He suggested that all new residents be
given a synopsis of the animal control ordinance when licensing their animal.
Mr. Dreher stated if this Ordinance passes a second reading, a vast majority of
the animal owners in the City would not be able to comply with it. He encouraged
a redraft that would address the letter-and the spirit of the decision and end up
with a fair and constitutional ordinance for the control of the animals.
Member Rice asked whether new residents and pet owners upon licensing their dog
could be given a synopsis of the animal control ordinance and what the cost of
this would be. Manager Rosland said the cost would be minimal, between $500 and
$1000.
Mayor Richards said he was dismayed that this had gotten to this point without
regard to common courtesies between citizens and neighbors. He stated he did not
support the handing out of information each time an ordinance was passed. He
expressed his interest in knowing the cost of making up a synopsis in hard copy
and also in human resources before he would agree to it being done.
Member Paulus commented that only a small percentage of animals in the City are
licensed, and if they remain in your home or stay on your property they do not
require licensing. Member Paulus stated she disagreed with a stated time limit to
correct a barking dog problem because it could be difficult to institute with
resident's work hours.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Ordinance adopted.
RESIDENT C0194ENT ABOUT STOP SIGN AT 54TH STREET Walt Sandison, 4612 W. 58th St.,
asked the Council why a stop sign had been placed on 54th Street and Minnehaha
Avenue. Mayor Richards commented that the final decision about placing this sign
was by the Council. Chief Swanson answered that a request by the neighborhood to
assess pedestrian safety along W. 54th Street had been made. The Traffic
Enforcement Unit worked the area and examined the street.. The Traffic Safety
Committee worked with the area for 3 months, took a vote which was split and
Council made the decision to implement the sign.
RESIDENT CONCERN VOICED OVER SOCCER FIELD CONDITIONS Bob Miller, a new Edina
;resident from Texas said he was a volunteer soccer coach with the Park and
Recreation Department. He commented on the condition of the fields, the danger to
the players and asked that consideration be given and dollars spent to encourage
the fastest growing sport in America. He suggested that maybe soccer fields need
to be protected from other uses or early spring use. Mayor Richards suggested Mr.
Miller speak to the Edina Soccer Association.
*BID AWARDED TO PURCHASE BRUSH CHIPPER Notion was made by Member Smith and was
seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for one 12" brush chipper with two
trade -ins to recommended low bidder, Vermeer Sales & Service. at $9.900.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR GRADING. SOD AND LANDSCAPING Notion was made by Member Smith and
was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for grading, sod and landscaping
around the parking lot at Braemar Golf Club House, Pamela and York Parks, the
Edina Art Center new expansion and-Arneson Acres Building to recommended
low- bidder Perkins Landscape, at $14,500.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR REMOVAL OF DISEASED TREES STUMPS AND TRIMEIING OF BOULEVARD TREES
Notion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid
for the removal of diseased trees, stumps and the trimming of boulevard trees to
recommended low bidder, Precision Landscape and Tree, as follows: 1. Trimming -
$2.91/DBH in., 2. Removal - $8.96/DBH in., 3. Grinding - $1.96 /in., with total bid
not to exceed $14,000.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
YARD WASTE REBATE APPROVED FOR RESIDENTS Janet Chandler, Recycling Coordinator,
explained that Hennepin County takes $1.90 out of the tip fee per ton for the
purpose of devoting that money to a compost program. Because the County has not
established a compost program, the funds are available to cities who have not cost
the county anything. Edina would be eligible to receive approximately $71,000.00.
Some cities are rebating directly to their residents, other cities have designed
programs. Different programs have been discussed, but instituting them by this
fall would be impossible. Another concern would be that the residents might
expect this commitment each year, and that might be impossible. Mrs. Chandler
stated she felt the $5.00 yard waste rebate to each property owner would be the
fair thing to do and hoped Council would agree to put this rebate in place.
Notion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly for adoption of
the following resolution:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that it hereby
authorizes a yard waste rebate of five dollars ($5.00) to each property owner in
the City, to be credited on the utility bill during the September /October/November
billing cycle.
ADOPTED this 6th day of August, 1990.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
Resolution adopted.
*FEASIBILITY REPORT PRESENTED FOR ALLEY IMPROVEMENT NO. E -3 SIDEWALK INPROVEI�NT
NO. S -50, STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO BA -292-
HEARING DATE SET FOR 8/20/90 Engineer Hoffman presented a feasibility report for
three projects which have been petitioned for by adjacent property owners. the
projects are feasible and staff would recommend hearing the projects on August 20,
1990. The projects are as follows:
Improvement Location Est.Cost
Project E -32 Alley between Oxford and Bedford Av. $22,619.90 (Conc.)
$ 9,969.36 (Bitum.)
Project S -50 Sidewalk - Valley Ln. along S.side $60,956.13
from 100+ E of the centerline of Doron
Ln. Easterly to the Soo Line RR tracks;
Ridgeview Dr. along S & W side from Soo
Line RR to W. 66th St.; W. 66th St.
along N side from Ridgeview Dr. to
C
Warren Ave.
Project BA -292 Street Surfacing with Concrete Curb & $82,013.92
Gutter on Lincoln Dr. from S lot line
of Lot 1, Blk. 1, Interlachen Hills
3rd Addn. south to mid -block of Lot 2,
Blk.2, Interlachen Hills 3rd Addn.
These projects would be funded by special assessment and state aid.
Member Smith introduced the following resolutions and moved their adoption:
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON
ALLEY IMPROVEMENT NO. E -32
1. The City Engineer, having submitted to the Council a preliminary report as to
the feasibility of the proposed Alley Improvement described in the form of Notice
of Hearing set forth below, and as to the estimated cost of such improvement, said
report is hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in the office of the
City Clerk.
2. This Council shall meet on Monday, August 20, 1990, at 7:00 P.M. in the Edina
City Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested in
said improvement.
3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time,
place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper once a
week for two successive weeks, the second of which publication is to be not less
than three days from the date of said meeting, and to mail notice to all affected
properties in substantially the following form:
(OFFICIAL PUBLICATION)
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 5424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CONCRETE ALLEY PAVING
IMPROVEMENT NO. E -32
ALLEY BETWEEN OXFORD AVENUE AND BEDFORD AVENUE
SOUTH OF 51ST STREET
The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall, on Monday, August 20,
1990, at 7:00 P.M., to consider the following proposed improvements to be
constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. The
approximate cost of said improvements are estimated by the City as set forth
below:
CONCRETE ALLEY PAVING
II�ROVEl�ENT NO. E -32 ESTIMATED COST
Alley between Oxford Ave. and $ 9,969.36 (Bituminous')
Bedford Ave. South of 51st St. $ 22,619.90 (Concrete)
The area proposed to be assessed for a portion of the cost of the proposed
improvements includes:
Lots 1 thru 6, Lot 7 & 10' of Lot 8, the South 40, of Lot 8, Lots 16 thru 18, Lot
19 and the South 20' of Lot 20, Lot 21 and the North 30' of Lot 20, Lot 22, and
the South 1/2 of Lot 23 and Lot 24 and the North 1/2 of Lot 23, Block 7, Brookside
Heights Addition.
These properties are proposed to be assessed at an estimated cost between $19.87
to $35.34-per square foot for concrete construction and $11.67 to $20.77 per
square foot for bituminous construction, depending on the actual assessment area.
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON
CONCRETE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. 5 -50
1. The City Engineer, having submitted to the Council a preliminary report as to
the feasibility of the proposed Concrete Sidewalk Improvement described in the
form of Notice of Hearing set forth below, and as to the estimated cost of such
improvement, said report is hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in
the office of the City Clerk.
2. This Council shall meet on Monday, August 20, 1990, at 7:00 P.M. in the Edina
City Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested in
said improvement.
3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time,
place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper once a
week for two successive weeks, the second of which publication is to be not less
than three days from the date of said meeting, and to mail notice to all affected
properties in substantially the following form:
(OFFICIAL PUBLICATION)
CITY OF EDINA-
4801 W. 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CONCRETE SIDEWALK
IMPROVEMENT NO. S-50
VALLEY LANE ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE FROM APPROXIMATELY 100, EAST
OF THE CENTERLINE OF DORON LANE EASTERLY TO THE SOO LINE RAILROAD TRACKS•
R.IDGEVIEV DRIVE ALONG THE SOUTH AND VEST SIDE FROM THE S0O LINE RAILROAD
TO VEST 66TH STREET: VEST 66TH STREET ALONG THE NORTH SIDE FROM
RIDGEVIEV DRIVE TO WARREN AVENUE
The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall, on Monday, August 20,
1990, at 7:00 P.M., to consider the following proposed improvements to be
constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. The
approximate cost of said improvements are estimated by the City as set forth
below:
VALLEY LANE - Along the South side from Approx. 100' East
of the Centerline of Doron Lane Easterly
to the Soo Line Railroad Tracks
RIDGEVIEW DRIVE - Along the South and West Side from the Soo Line
Railroad to West 66th Street
WEST 66TH STREET - Along the North Side from Ridgeview Drive to
Warren Avenue
CONCRETE SIDEWALK ESTIMATED COST
IMPROVEMENT S -50 $ 60, 956.13
The project is proposed to be funded by State Aid funds.
Marcella Daehn
City Clerk
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON
STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER
IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -292
1 Th
e City Engineer, having submitted to the Council a preliminary report as tc
the feasibility of the proposed Street Surfacing with Concrete Curb & Gutter
Improvement No. BA -292 described in the form of Notice of Hearing set forth below,
and as to the estimated cost of such improvement, said report is hereby approved
and directed to be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2. This Council shall meet on Monday, August 20, 1990, at 7:00 P.H. in the Edina
City Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested in
said improvement.
3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time,
place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper once a
week for two successive weeks, the second of which publication is to be not less
than three days from the date of said meeting, and to mail notice to all affected
properties in substantially the following form:
(OFFICIAL PUBLICATION)
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB & GU'1TER
IMPROVE!ffiNT NO. BA -292
LINCOLN DRIVE FROM SOUTH LOT LINE OF
LOT 1, BLOCS 1, INTEBLACHEN HILLS 3RD ADDITION
SOUTH TO MID -BLOCS OF
LOT 2, BLOCS 2, CHEN HILTS 3RD ADDITION
The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall, on Monday, August 20,
1990, at 7:00 P.M., to consider the following proposed improvements to be,
constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. The
approximate cost of said improvements are estimated by the City as set forth
below:
STREET SURFACING WITS
CONCRETE CURB b GUTTER
IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -292
From South Lot Line of Lot
Block 1, Interlachen Hills
South to Mid -Block of Lot
Block 2, Interlachen Hills
The area proposed to be assessed for
improvements includes:
ESTIMATED COST
1,
3rd Addn., $ 82,013.92
2.
3rd Addn.
a portion of the cost of the proposed
From the South Lot Line of Lot 1, Block 1, Interlachen Hills 3rd Addition, South
to mid -block of Lot 2, Block 2, Interlachen Hills 3rd Addition.
These properties are proposed to be assessed at $81.01 per lineal foot.
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the resolutions was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Resolutions adopted.
APPOINTMENT OF DAVID B. ROSENBLATT TO THE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES ADVISORY
COMlIITTEE APPROVED Mayor Richards advised that he intended to appoint David B.
Rosenblatt to the Community Health Services Advisory Committee. Motion was made
by Member Smith for consent of the Mayor's appointment of David B. Rosenblatt to
the Community Health Services Advisory Committee for an unexpired term to 2/1/92.
Motion was seconded by Member Kelly.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*ELECTION JUDGES APPOINTED FOR PRIMARY ELECTION ON 9111/90 Notion was made by
Member Smith and seconded by Member Kelly for adoption of the following
resolution:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the following election judges be
appointed.to serve on the election boards for the Primary Election to be held on
September 11, 1990, and that the City Clerk be and is hereby authorized to make
any substitutions or additions as may be deemed necessary: Precinct 1 - Eugenia
Williams, Chair, Lois Hallquist, Barbara Anderson, Dorie Capetz, Arleen Friday;
Precinct 2 - Marjorie Ruedy, Chair, Pauline Carroll, Elizabeth Anfinson, Joan
Flumerfelt, Kathleen Tierney; Precinct 3 - Linda Smith, Chair, Sherrill Estensen,
Jane Andrews, Patricia Dill, Barbara Bergen; Precinct 4 - Shirley Dibble, Chair,
Rachel Schoening, Marjory Brothers, Marion Cracraft, Jeanette Lushine; Precinct 5
- Rosemary McGlynn, Chair, Mildred Karr, Barbara Martin, Carol Ledder, Susan
Little; Precinct 6 - Jane Bains, Chair, Catherine Swanson, Mary Cleaveland,
Barbara Herbers, Susan Zwakman; Precinct 7 - Helen Peterson, Chair, Kathleen
Engquist, Eunice Overby, Gertrude Snoeyenbos, Lois Strupp; Precinct 8 - Jane
Moran, Chair, Myra Hykes, Barbara Nelin, LuJean Swenson, Kathleen Bradford;
Precinct 9 - Aileen Konhauser, Chair, Florence Boughton, Patricia Monson, Marie
Robinson, Colleen Crew; Precinct 10 - Barbara Erlandson, Chair, Mary Shoquist,
Kathryn Rivers, Joann Lonergan, Jeanine Westling; Precinct 11 - Sharon Lee Smith,
Chair, Alice Burnell, Karen Vickman, Delphine Duff, Carol Melichar; Precinct 12 -
Ardis Wexler, Chair, Shirley Bjerken, Carol Hite, Wynn Meeker, Mary Scholz;
Precinct 13 - Doris Peterson, Chair, Elaine Tollefsrud, Margaret Polta, Annadell
Quantrell, Audrey Sherman; Precinct 14 - Mary Jane Platt, Chair, Joyce Hanson,
Louise Carlson, Esther Olson, Donna Brastad; Precinct 15 - Katherine Luikens,
Chair, Jean Hare, Joann Buie, Carol Hanson, Patricia Robbins; Precinct 16 - Mary
McDonald, Chair, Bonnie Bjerken, Pat Halvorson, Bernadine Chapman, Donna
Montgomery; Precinct 17 - Lorna Livingston, Chair, Jean McDermid, Louise Jackson,
Marie Bachman, Mary Ryan; Precinct 18 - Jean Erdall, Chair, Selma Shelton, Doris
Blake, Betty Lou Petersen, Patricia MacCornack; Precinct 19 - Charlotte Scanlon, -
Chair, Jane Hess, Audrey Nankivell, Alyce Hamilton, Jeanette Wurst; Precinct 20 -
Patricia Olander, Chair, Anita Delegard, Zelma Gray, Evelyn Herkal, Harriet Koch.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
DONALD LOFTHUS b LARRY MADDEN RECOMMENDED FOR APPOINTMENT TO NINE MILE CREEK
WATERSHED DISTRICT BOARD Hennepin County has advised us that the terms of Donald
Lofthus and Larry Madden on the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Board will
expire on September 29, 1990. City Manager Rosland recommended a resolution of
reappointment for them.
Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the terms of Donald Lofthus and Larry Madden on the Nine Mile Creek
Watershed District Board will expire on September 29, 1990;
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, MN, that it hereby
recommends and nominates Donald Lofthus and Larry Madden to the Hennepin County
Board of Commissioners for re- appointment to the Nine Mile Creek Watershed
District Board and urges the Commissioners to approve the re- appointments.
ADOPTED this 6th day of August, 1990.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Rice.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Resolution adopted.
NOMINATION OF ALISON FOR TO CASH BOARD REQUESTED Mayor Richards said that he had
been contacted by Alison Fuhr concerning her reappointment to the Community Action
Suburban Hennepin (CASH) Board as a representative from Edina for the private
sector. Member Kelly requested that Alison Fuhr give periodic information to
Council on CASH. Mayor Richards suggested that a letter on behalf of the Council
be sent in support of her reappointment to the CASH Board.
Motion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Kelly directing staff to
send a letter on behalf of the Council in support of the reappointment of Alison
Fuhr to the CASH Board.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
1990 -1991 WORK PROGRAM PRESENTED - CONTINUED TO AUGUST 20 1990 Manager Rosland
presented the 1990 -1991 Work Program as a follow -up to the March 12, 1990,
Strategic Planning Retreat. This program was based on the summary prepared by
Barbara Arney, facilitator for the meeting. Manager Rosland gave a brief
description of the four issues:
Issue 1. City Standards - Proposal for a draft codification of ordinances and
policies with final adoption by July, 1991.
Issue 2. Staff Development - Provide an ongoing program of staff development that
ensures a continuity of staff leadership.
Issue 3. Recycling - Presently 80% of all single family, two family and townhouse
residents participate in the recycling program. The City will require recycling
pick -up for all multi - family dwellings by January 1, 1991.
Issue 4. Financial Strength - Plans are to establish a think tank of community
leaders to find alternative revenue sources.
Member Kelly asked where the money would come from to complete the codification of
ordinances. Manager Rosland said this would come from the contingency fund and
possibly next year form the Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG); a
legal expenditure of these funds. Member Kelly said her understanding of the use
of CDBG funds was in the human /social service area, even though codification of of
the ordinances is important. Member Smith stated he is in agreement with the
codification but does not believe the block grant monies should be used for this
purpose. Member Rice asked for a clarification on the codification process.
Manager Rosland explained it is a simplification /modernization of the current
ordinances. It is a time to review the existing ones, bring forward some that
should be added, and mainly do it as one process.
Member Rice stated, in regard to Issue 2, that he believed that staff was already
high - quality and why was it included in the Work Program. Manager Rosland said
that this was an issue that came out of the March Strategic Planning Meeting, and
this was a formalized report in response to that.
Mayor Richards said in reference to Issue 4, that he supported the idea of
appointing community leaders to an ad hoc advisory board, to deal with the
feasibility of tapping non - traditional revenue sources for supporting City
operations. He asked the Council to give him the names of two or three persons
willing to serve on the committee to the August 20, 1990, meeting. Member Paulus
inquired whether these people should be residents or could they only work in the
City. Mayor Richards said either criteria would fit. Member Kelly expressed her
concern about whether this group would be a duplication of the Futures Commission
in their efforts to raise money. She would like to see someone on this ad hoc
committee from the Futures Commission to tie it all together. Member Rice asked
why there was a budgeted amount on Issue 1 and not on the others. Manager Rosland
stated that the other issues are of minimal consequence, with staff time being the
main expenditure. Member Smith inquired what the cost had been to put in place
the dog ordinance, and what expenditures would be with codification and
implementing or possible new ordinances with legal fees, etc. Manager Rosland
said approximately $1,000.00 was spent on the dog ordinance and it would be a
Council decision how extensive the codification would be.
Motion was made by Member Rice and seconded by Member Smith to adopt the 1991 Mork
Program as presented.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS BEQUEST FOR REBATE OF EXCESS TAX INCREKENTS CONTINUED TO
14290 MEETING Manager Rosland said a letter dated July 12, 1990, from Raymond
Smyth, Superintendent of Schools, had been received requesting the City to rebate
excess tax increments which had resulted from the 1988 School District Referendum.
This request was considered by the Council on July 24, 1989, and April 16, 1990.
Council, at the April 16, 1990, meeting, elected not to grant the rebate as the
rebate did not appear to increase the revenues of the school district. Council
stated their willingness to reconsider the request if the effect of the rebate
would be increased revenues to the .district. In Dr. Smyth's letter, the district
has now determined the rebate is not revenue neutral and would increase the
district's revenues. The district is now requesting the increments for the
1989 -90 fiscal year as well as the 1990 -91 fiscal year. The 1990 payable
increments resulting from the 1988 referendum totalled $57,535.00 from the
Grandview and 50th /France tax increment financing districts. If Council were to
proceed with the rebate, if would be instituted for payable 1990 taxes. The
rebate would occur after receipt of the 1990 tax settlements, and should be
conditioned upon collection of at least 95% of the expected taxes from each tax
increment financing district, i.e., no more than a 5% delinquency rate of total
tax revenue. The recommendation is for the rebate to be applied only for the 1990
payable taxes and to be considered annually thereafter. Manager Rosland commented
that Council may wish to require the rebate be used for projects of mutual benefit
to the District and the City.
Member Kelly asked what happened to the proposed legislation that school districts
be paid their money in a tax increment district, up front, before the money was
used to pay up bonds. Assistant Manager Hughes commented that a part of the law
passed this last session has a provision for districts created after the law was
passed whereby a city's local government aid are reduced by the apparent capture
in tax increment districts of moneys that would otherwise flow to the state to be
used for education credits. Therefore, since the districts are pre -1974, the
districts are not affected. Member Kelly recommended this be rebated, but
reviewed every year, and agreed that suggestions for its implementation be given.
She asked if this is an issue now because of their being on a budgetary process.
Manager Rosland answered that since these funds are considered to be traditional
revenue and not revenue neutral, this was an encouragement to ask for the funds.
Member Smith stated he would be in favor of this rebate if the school district
could get a decisive ruling, in writing, from the Department of Education, that
these funds would remain in Edina. He does not favor Council recommending where
the money should be spent since the money was raised by a school referendum the
persons we elected to represent us should decide on where the money is spent.
Member Smith commented that City staff can get more leverage by keeping a list of
the .rebate amounts as a reminder to the schools. This transfer should be done in
an appropriate fashion but not as a give -away.
Member Rice was in agreement with Member Smith that a spirit of cooperation should
be maintained with this rebate.
Mayor Richards said he was not in agreement, and questioned what would be the
scenario when the Richfield School District inquires about a rebate. This has
never been included in the schools budget adopting process and is clearly a
windfall. These are municipal funds, and should stay within the municipality.
This could create a problem with the treatment of one school district differently
from the other. ,Mayor Richards suggested that a letter be written to the school
district stating this had been taken under advisement and our answer is the same
as it was initially.
Motion vas made by Member Smith and seconded be Member Kelly for staff to do
further research on this and to revisit the issue on September 4, 1990.
Member Smith commented he would like a clarification of paragraph 3, in the July
12, 1990, letter from Superintendent Smyth, and what impact this would have on the
southeast Edina area.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
SOUTH HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 9 1990 NOTED Manager
Rosland said the South Hennepin Human Services Council has scheduled a meeting of
August 9, 1990, for a Regional Forum. Council Members were urged to attend.
HENNEPIN COUNTY 1991 MULTI- FAMILY HOUSING RECYCLING POLICY INFORMATION GIVEN
Manager Rosland explained the response staff had submitted to Hennepin County
regarding the implementation of a study, costing $175,000.00 for a pilot program
for multi - family housing. Manager Rosland and Recycling Coordinator Janet
Chandler drafted a letter to Hennepin County recommending the study dollars be
spent to implement multi - family housing recycling. Hennepin County staff
responded July 31, 1990, with three recommendations instead of providing a subsidy
to the Minnesota Multi- Housing Association as follows:
1. Hennepin County should amend Ordinance 13 to require multifamily
recycling by 7/1/91... Municipalities must adopt mandatory ordinances that require
property owners to provide recycling services with specially marked containers by
7/1/91. .
2. Hennepin County will subsidize the cost of containers up to a maximum of
$5.00 /multifamily household. Cities must apply for this reimbursement prior to
12/31/91. Cost to the the County for containers is $475,000.00, coming from a
grant provided by the Metropolitan Council.
3. 5 -8 unit buildings can be added at the City's discretion in 1990 to the
existing municipal curbside service and would be eligible for funding under the
current reimbursement policy.
Municipal Recycling Coordinators will meet August 16, to discuss these issues.
1991 BUDGET ASSUMPTIONS DISCUSSIONS HELD Manager Rosland presented the 1991
Budget Assumptions and explained that again there are three scenarios.
Graphics were presented showing proposed expenditures, revenues and new programs
that reflected a proposed 4.2% increase.
In response to a concern by Council to do a study comparing salaries from other
communities, the Stanton Group report was used. In the study, position by
position was studied, including salary, benefits, PERA and FICA. The study shows
where Edina falls in comparison with other communities. Edina has historically
been in the middle of the upper half. Data was shown comparing the City of
Edina's benefit package with other cities. Edina's benefit package is at
$190.00 /month with all other cities at approximately $220.00 /month depending on
position. The City of Edina's employee package is the lowest in the benefit
package category. The projection for pay raises in other cities are all basically
in the 4% category.
A study was presented showing private sector salary survey information in 1990 and
projections for 1991. Government salaries were in the mid -range in the executive,
exempt and non - exempt ranges.
Following discussion, it was the consensus of the Council that staff be directed
to prepare a draft hardcopy of the proposed 1991 Budget by the August 20, 1990,
meeting.
Manager Rosland showed a draft press release to be printed in the Edina
Sun - Current regarding the Thursday, August 23, 1990, Budget Meeting, at 5:00 P.M.
*RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF TRANSFER OF FUNDS AGREEMENT Finance Director
John Wallin provided Council with information regarding changes in the way First
Banks now handle their wire transfers. A central division within the bank will
now handle all wire transfers whereas in the past, a specified person at First
Bank would do transfers as well as other customer service tasks for the City.
That person will still do customer service with the exception of the wire
transfers. The central handling of these transactions will increase both the
speed and efficiency of the City's funds transfers as well as reduce the costs
involved.
Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved adoption:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, from time to time, the City of Edina, orally requests First Bank National
Association, a national banking association to transfer fiords to other banks for
credit to persons or corporations designated by the City of Edina. So that the
Bank may have standing instructions upon which to act pursuant to oral requests
for the transfer of funds:
BE IT RESOLVED, that John C. Wallin, the Director of Finance for the City of Edina
is hereby authorized to execute the Domestic and International Finds Wire Transfer
Agreement, on behalf of the City with First Bank National Association, a national
banking association providing for telephone requests for the transmission of fiords
belonging to this City, upon the' and conditions set forth in said agreement.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the authority conferred herein shall continue in full
force and effect until written notice of its revocation shall be received by said
Bank at its office. -
BE IT FURTEER RESOLVED that Marcella M. Daehn, Clerk of the City of Edina hereby .
certify that the foregoing is a true copy of a resolution adopted by the City
Council of said City at a meeting of said Council and regularly called; noticed
and held, and at which time was present a quorum of said Council on August 6,
1990, and that said resolution is in full force and effect.
ADOPTED this 6th day of August, 1990.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Resolution adopted.
*CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Kelly to
approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register
dated 8/6/90 and consisting of 34 pages: Ceneral Fund $326,493.85, Communications
$1,770.96, Art Center $4,062.16, Swimming Pool Fund $7,099.78, Golf Course Fund
$40,030.91, Recreation Center Fund $950.11, Gun Range Fund $389.54, Edinborough
Park $10,783.79, Utility fiord $271,637.03, Storm Sewer Utility $4,108.66, Liquor
Dispensary Fund $20,575.92, Construction Fund $3,885.37, TOTAL $691,788.08.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the
meeting adjourned at 9:00 P.M.
Acting City Clerk
A.
ch
•'NcbRpopu_ F'O •
.188
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From. Francis Hoffman
City Engineer /p
Date: 4 September, 1990
Subject: Public Hearing
Alley Improvement E -32
Between Oxford Avenue
and Bedford Avenue
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
III . A.
Consent
❑
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
0
To Council
Action
0
Motion
❑
Resolution
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Approve a bituminous pavement alley project.
Info /Background:
This public hearing was continued from the August 20th Council meeting to this
meeting. After receiving the public hearing notice and the initial public
hearing review, the neighbors have resubmitted a petition to City Council.
It is clear that ten of the fourteen neighbors support a bituminous paving
project. However, all do not agree on the method of proposed assessment.
It is staff recommendation that a bituminous paving improvement project be
approved with a proposed ten year assessment. Additionally, if project is approved,
that at the special assessment hearing (which would be held in September, 1991),
assess all properties equally or pro -rate costs based on alley use. A decision
to pro -rate the assessment would be done under the exceptions scenario. In most
situations in Edina, a large majority of properties abutting alleys also use
the alley. This may be an exception to that general scenario and therefore may
be considered differently.
Staff will make a presentation to Council on the new petition of the neighbors.
August 26, 1990
Mayor Fred Richards and
Edina City Council
c/o Edina City Clerk
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Ref: Improvement No. fi -32
Pavement of Alley between Oxford Ave. and Bedford Ave.
Dear Mayor and Council Members,
As directed by the Council at the public hearing on this issue, I have
drafted and circulated the two enclosed petitions. I would also like
to take this opportunity to point out some important comments that
were brought up while going around with the petitions and talking
to neighbors:
It appears that all of the neighbors prefer the blacktop option
over the concrete ' option, and would like to see the project done
as inexpensively as possible, within city construction
requirements.
Most of us who use this alley want to get the assessment
passed and, therefore, have not made any conditional
stipulations as to how assessments are to be distributed,
instead leaving the distribution to the discretion of the council
as to what is most fair.
The people in our neighborhood like each other, and those of us
that use the alley and want the assessment passed are as
concerned about fairness as those who do not use the alley.
This is the reason that the conditional approval petition was
also circulated.
It appears that a plan for a pro -rated assesment, with current users
of the alley paying a greater share per property than non - users,
would satisfy, the councils feeling that all properties should -be
August 26, 1990
Improvement No. E -32
Page 2
assessed, and would also have the approval of the vast majority of
all property owners. This could be looked at as similar to the
difference between lakefront properties, and comparable properties
with lake rights. Both offer an enhanced value, but they are
certainly not worth the same amount.
I know that at the public hearing you heard some widely varied
opinions. We do, however, live in a neighborhood of reasonable
people. We have now had time to discuss this issue among
ourselves and develop more unified points of view. I believe if an
option to distribute the assessments in the above manner were
pursued, that you would find very little, if any opposition.
In summary, I urge you to vote for passage of this improvement, in
keeping with the council's mission statement to maintain .fidina as a
premier community in the Twin Cities area. In the interest of
fairness and in acknowledgment of the desires of the majority of
the constituents affected, I urge that the assessment be passed with
the costs distributed on a pro -rated bases.
Sincerely,
David A. Morris
5116 Bedford Avenue
Edina, MN 55436
929 -7757 (res.)
933 -0800 (off.)
To: Edina City Council
Date: August 21. 1990
We. the undersigned residents owning property abutting the
service alley located on the 5100 block between Bedford Avenue
and Oxford Avenue. having received and reviewed cost estimates
provided by the city. would be in favor of improvement of the
alley by bituminous pavement if the costs were assessed in one of
the following manners:
That properties with garages that are accessed by the
alley be assessed a' greater share of the cost per
property than properties that do not use the alley for
access.
am
That the costs be assessed only against properties with
garages which are accessed by the alley.
The undersigned request that any improvement that may be approved
be completed at the least possible cost that meets city
construction requirements. and that all possible cost reduction
options be taken under consideration.
Signature
I
Address
Phone
9.27-a i
To: Edina City Council
Date: August 21. 1990
We. the undersigned residents owning property abutting the
service alley located on the 5100 block between Bedford Avenue
and Oxford Avenue. having received and reviewed cost estimates
provided by the city, are in favor of passage of assessments for
the purpose of improvement of the alley by bituminous pavement.
The undersigned request that the improvement be completed at
the least possible cost that meet city construction requirements.
and that all possible cost reduction options be taken under
consideration.
The undersigned acknowledge that the counci
the distribution of the assessed' costs in the
sees as most fit and fair to all parties affected
Signature
Address
1 will determine
manner which it
Phone
92-1 -77: 7
9,;al�n
` � J
Address
1 will determine
manner which it
Phone
92-1 -77: 7
9,;al�n
e
W. 51 st Street
N,
C
C
I
5101
5100
0D — —
/ul ay + ,0 13
?13-117- z1- 3Z -C3117
C
5104
h
r
5109
01,y.
!of
-20 -!I _Z .a o! /c.
5108
�- aD
C
C
_ _
�I Ji71
cu
F
}
51 1.3
}
W
a
�
J
51 12
�
e
I df 11 + N 30' loT 20
4
o
O
w
-2�- 11'►_1!_32. v11s
:6 -!;�_ -f.37- Ol.�_
' r"
�
x
C
F
m
• 51 16
v,
�
5121
e
104 1 9 i 5.20' lo•!fp
28 . rl �..7 I _ 32 - 01
1$_017-1/- 32
F
- 5120
c
a
5125
�g -1/7. __ 0,Ot
F
I�t le rs11C
.ia - //7 - .2/- 32
1u4 7+ N1o' E
F
1g- 1/7-31- 3:_Olp�
5129
C
-°
5131
5128
F
�
10+ lG +!)
So 40' L•4 8
0
18- /17- 2l -32- 0 //Z
'E- 117 -0 /�7%
F
= FOR THE PROJECT
C
= CONDITIONAL
Debra Strege
5113 OXford Ave.
Edina,. MN 55436
August 31, 1990
Edina City Council Members
Edina City Hall
4801 W. 50th St.
Edina, MN 55424
Esteemed Council Members:
A quiet, unobtrusive alley camouflaged by grape vines and mature trees used
to be the only thing dividing neighbors of the 51st block of Bedford and
Oxford Avenues But the issue to pave the alley has changed that. A
Council vote in favor of this improvement runs counter to the wishes of the
majority and will sever the peace between neighbors forever.
You have before you three petitions; one opposing any alley improvement or
special assessments, one favoring it and another favoring an assessment
structure based on property access to the alley. Please see the petition
in opposition submitted to ou two weeks ago. As I understand your voting
procedure, once the alley issue was raised, you make all decisions
regarding the paving, the material used and the contractor hired. Because
of the strong opposition you require a petition with 65% in favor for a
three to two vote. Less than 65/ requires a 4 to 1 vote. So you have the
petition you require to determine your voting ratio. )rou also have a
petition in which more than 500% oppose any improvement or assessment.
FACT:
ONL7r FIVE OF THE FOURTEEN PROPERTIES HAVE ONLY ALLEY ACCESS.
SIX OF THE FOURTEEN PROPERTIES HAVE NO ALLEY ACCESS.
THREE PROPERTIES HAVE BOTH FRONT AND ALLE)r ACCESS.
Why would anyone favor a special assessment for something they never use or
don't need? You should also note that even some of those who have only
alley assess have signed against the assessment or improvement.
I find it strange that neither Mrs. or Mr.. Morris, the main proponents for
the pavement, have approached me with any petition considering that fact
that I work out of my home, I have an answering machine and call - waiting.
I was also surprised to find out Mr. Morris has been telling other
neighbors that he's spoken with me about the alley. This is a blatant
untruth! If nothing else, Mr. Morris' actions cause me and my fellow
neighbors to question his intentions to make peace especially when so many
have been lead to believe by Mr. Morris that they can persuade Council to
tax us according to use. Those are Mr. Morris' rules. They are not the
Council's.
And finally, although you stated that this is not to be a head count except
for determining your required voting ratio, please only count people who
are property owners and omit the signatures by the Kings at 5104 Bedford
Ave. They are RENTERS. Mr. John Madgett is the property owner of 5104
Bedford Ave. and he has signed'in opposition to this pavement and has sent
you a letter regarding same. Also, I understand Mr. and Mrs. Bieker of
5131 Oxford have signed under both 5131 and 5129, their rental side.
Unless they are to be assessed double for their duplex, their vote should
only count as one.
I hope you will consider the facts and take all petitions and letters into
account before reaching a decision.
Sincerely,
Debr' Stre
C
o e
!,�)7) REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis Hoffman�� %)
City Engineer
Date: 4 September, 1990
Subject: Preliminary Plat
Approval for Lindell
Addition on Antrim Rd.
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # -U —A.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
DI
To Council
Action E�
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Place a condition on the plat which requires a document which is recorded and
tied to the land which requires any new hard surface drainage to be directed
to the street via piping or over the surface drainage. Additionally, require
the construction of a new concrete driveway apron (per attached drawing of
standard driveway approach) at 7101 Antrim Court.
Info/Background-
The City Council continued the public hearing on the preliminary plat approval
for the Lindell Addition to allow time for the engineering staff to conduct a
detailed engineering review of drainage on Antrim Road as it relates to the
property immediately south of the proposed subdivision. Attached is a sketch
of 7101 Antrim Court and the approximate driveway location. The concern on this
property is the driveway has back pitch toward the home which makes it very easy
for water to leave the street and enter the property. There are stormwater catch
basins on the street east and west of the driveway. The solution to improving
the curb line drainage would be to lower the westerly catch basin approximately
one -half foot and install a concrete driveway system per our standard design
which would have a six inch rise in the apron. This would provide a good
drainage solution for both the existing owner at 7101 Antrim Court and the
requirements being recommended for the proposed Lindell Addition. The public
works crews could complete the street project at the 7101 Antrim Court address
and charge the labor time to our storm water utility account.
The resultant effect would be a rise in the driveway at 7101 Antrim Court then
a decline towards the garage but would effectively keep normal drainage from
entering the property.
i .It;7:r,t,i; STANDARD DRIVEWAY CUTS
EDINAi MINNESOTA
VAR. WIDTH
I
ON DRIVES
C - TR =3.0'
I
I�
18" GUTTER
EDGE Of PAVEMENT
EXPANSION JOINT
STANDARD DRIVEWAY m APPROACH
RESIDENTIAL
0)
I40 3.67'
I
0.13
EDGE OF
PAVEMENT
X- SECTION OF DRIVEWAY
1/2° EXPANSION JOINT 70
MATERIAL m�
4i =
T
IT V2 — GIs -1o' /a
t 4�
I
VAR 71RAD- 7VAR.
COMMERICAL DRIVEWAY DETAIL
CONCRETE SHALL BE AS PROVIDED IN 2461 (MINNESCTA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAY
CONSTRUCTION, JAN. I, 1968 ) SUBJECT TO MIX REQU,REMENTS OF 3A15 CONCRETE
"PE 2, WHITE PIGMENTED MEMBRANE CURING COMPOUND WILL BE USED
CONCRETE SHALL CONTAIN ENTRAINED AIR IN AMOUNT OF 6 %, PLUS OR MINUS 1 %- ENTRAINED
BY USE OF APPROVED ADMIXTURE
DRIVEWAY CUTS IN CONCRETE STREETS WITH INTEGRAL CURB SHALL BE MADE BY
MAKING A DEEP SAW CUT ONE FOOT OUT FROM THE BACK OF .CURB
r,
1
/ 954.5 b
.y,' 945.
9
do / to
OI I.
7`----� �M 2.83 I X39.7 q�y.5
�� Q° o
M.3 I
N
\ 948.9
� \ I
\ •�j ° c S� � � i M' �B �• P� I
I
A� , o
Cale C.0
72. 35
a(�1 %��� . \
.e
r.,
945.8 J
1_ 'y o1 Edina Bldg. Deg
e'
•
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
KENNETH ROSLAND
Agenda Item
IV.
B.
From:
CRAIG LARSEN
Consent
( j
Information Only
❑
Date:
SEPTEMBER 4, 1990.
Mgr. Recommends
( I
To HRA
Subject:
PRELIMINARY REZONING
-•
To Council 1
JERRY'S ENTERPRISES/
OPUS. Z -90 -5.
Action
0
Motion
C
I
Resolution
Ordinance
jI
Discussion i
Recommendation:
The Planning Commission has recommended approval of the Preliminary
Rezoning from PID, Planned Industrial District to PCD -2, Planned
Commercial District. This recommendation has the following
conditions:
1. Final Rezoning.
2. Plat Approval.
3. Amendment of Comprehensive Plan and the Grandview Area
Redevelopment Plan.
4. Redevelopment Agreement with the HRA.
5. Implementation of Traffic Study recommendations.
6. Preliminary or Concept Approval of a Redevelopment Plan for
area north of Eden (existing school bus site).
INFO /BACKGROUND
If the Council grants preliminary approval of the proposed land use
concept, staff would immediately begin to negotiate the terms of a
redevelopment contract.
The HRA resolution of condemnation for these properties lapsed as
of August 1, 1990. The property owners have requested that the
resolution be readopted.
1 ,
During the summer of 1988, Jerry's Enterprises appeared before the
Planning Commission on two occasions with a office /retail
redevelopment concept for this property. This concept was not
considered by the City Council. I have attached Commission minutes
and other material's relating to this proposal.
The proposed rezoning does require that the Comprehensive Plan and
the Redevelopment Plan be amended. The Comprehensive Plan
currently illustrates the properties as Industrial, consistent with
their use at the time the Plan was adopted. The Redevelopment Plan
assumed a change in land use. The BRW study of 1985 suggested
office - showroom or multifamily housing. In 1987, the Council voted
in favor of a multifamily reuse during their review of the Land Use
Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The Council considered but did
not act on a multifamily redevelopment proposal by Knudsen
Companies. Since that time we have seen the development of almost
300 apartment units in the immediate area. Staff feels that
further development of multifamily housing in the immediate area is
not desirable at this time.
The proposed retail use of the property was not considered by
previous studies. In order to help evaluate the land we asked Mike
Scott of Jackson /Scott and Associates to evaluate the site for
retail use. A copy of his report is attached. We also asked BRW
to update the 1984 Grandview Area Traffic Study. The updated study
assumes the proposed development as well as redevelopment of the
existing school bus garage, the car wash and the medical clinic for
trip generation purposes.
runoff. Chairman Runyan said the minutes read, "New drains
roof and other hard surface areas must be studied and inve ed
by the City Engineer so as not to cause aggravation tting
property owners. This condition would be imposed a uilding
permit stage and reviewed by a drainage engineer."
Commissioner McClelland questioned Mrs. He f as previously
recommended, she contacted the City eering Department
regarding her ongoing water problems. Herman said she did
call the City, and Carl Shannon, who h the City, came out and
viewed the site. She added issue is being studied.
Commissioner McClelland re that when the Engineering
Department arrives at a so to the current water problem the
Commission receives a c their findings.
Commissioner Shaw ated that the proponent is responsible for
not aggravating esent water problems, nor solving the current
water proble
Commiemm ' Ingwalson moved to recommend to the Council the
reco tions approved by the Planning Commission at its June 27,
1 uni t g.
on
U0iii . NEW BUSINESS:
Z -90 -5 Jerry's Enterprises /Opus. Preliminary Rezoning,
PID, Planned Industrial District to PCD -2, Planned
Commercial District
Mr. Larsen presented his staff report noting the property is
approximately 8.7 acres in size and is developed with industrial
uses. The proponents, Jerry's Enterprises and Opus have developed
a proposal that requests a zoning change from the present Planned
Industrial to Planned Commercial.
Mr. Larsen concluded since the last Commission meeting progress has
been made on a redevelopment agreement. We expect to have
agreement on key issues for consideration by the Council /HRA at
their August 20, 1990 meeting.
Mr. Larsen added staff has become convinced that there is a market
for more retail in this area and that the type of development
proposed would be appropriate for the site. We continue to believe
2
that the redevelopment south of Eden should be linked to a retail
redevelopment of the existing school bus garage and possibly the
car wash and clinic.
Staff believes that the proposal has merit. Mr. Larsen added staff
is especially pleased by the way the bus garage has been integrated
into the development. The elimination of the parking deck and the
low scale of the development are also improvements.
Staff would recommend preliminary approval of the redevelopment
proposal subject to the following conditions:
1. Final Rezoning
2. Plat Approval
3. Amendment of Comprehensive Plan and Redevelopment Plan
4. Redevelopment Agreement with the HRA
5. Implementation of Traffic Study recommendations
6. Preliminary Plat approval of a redevelopment plan for
area north of Eden Avenue
Mr. Larsen introduced Mr. Bob Shadduck, Jerry's Enterprises, Bob
Worthington, Opus, and Howard Preston, BRW., adding they are
present this evening to answer any questions the Commission has on
the proposed project.
Commissioner Ingwalson questioned the monetary involvement of the
City on- this project. Mr. Larsen said he believes the City will
have some involvement bonds. Commissioner Ingwalson asked who will
look into the aspect of the City's monetary involvement. Mr.
Larsen explained that for a matter such as this, the HRA will be
the body that will decide, if any, City involvement.
Commisioner Faust inquired if the project would be put out for
competitive bids. Mr. Larsen said his understanding is that the
HRA had rejected putting the project out for competitive bids.
Commissioner Hale said there has been mention of condemnation of
the property, and questioned if condemnation would take place if a'
purchase agreement was signed. Mr. Larsen said with a purchase
agreement there would be no need for condemnation of the property.
Commissioner Ingwalson commented the past and present land use of
Kunz Oil may result in the need for an environmental evaluation to
be performed on the site before redevelopment can take place. Mr.
Larsen agreed that the site would be studied carefully from an
environmental standpoint before excavating could begin.
Commissioner McClelland said the staff report indicates an August
31, 1990, date on development proposals. She added, in her opinion
this proposal is being looked at in a rush and questioned if the
school district is able to pay for the garage. Mr. Larsen
responded that the school district staff endorses this proposal.
3
Commissioner McClelland noted there
Regis if Regis decides to add retail
Mr. Larsen said previous discussions
to remain in Edina and use their
corporate headquarters. Continuing,
has been no discussion concerning
retail use on that site.
may be some competition from
businesses on their property.
with Regis indicate they want
property as their permanent
Mr. Larsen said to date there
a potential redevelopment to
Mr. Bob Worthington told the Commission the concept of this
proposal has been in the works for two years. He added the
development team has been very excited with what they feel is a
project of mixed uses (i.e., the bus garage and commercial uses).
Mr. Worthington informed the Commission the development team has
met with the residents of Richmond Hills and believe they have a
positive view of this proposal versus the previous proposals.
Mr. Shadduck reported to the Commission he has been in touch with
the school district and they indicated they are very receptive to
this proposal. He added the school district wants the bus garage
to remain in the neighborhood. The proposed location of the bus
garage, along with the proposed increase of on -site parking for the
drivers.and staff is very positive.
Commissioner Runyan asked Mr. Shadduck if the development has any
anchor tenants that have expressed an interest in the development?
Commissioner Byron added he also has been pondering that same
question, and asked if a theatre is proposed. Continuing,
Commissioner Byron asked, if without violating any confidences, Mr.
Shadduck could inform them of possible tenants.
Mr. Shadduck remarked that he would feel uncomfortable in
mentioning names of possible tenants that have indicated interest
in this location so early in the City approval process. He added
a number of businesses have expressed interest in this area, some
of the services mentioned were; video, photo and art studios, mail
and packaging services, food services, either sit down or take out.
Commisioner Faust indicated she feels the development should have
more than one owner to offset any conflicts of interest Jerry's may
have with a tenant that may compete with them. She asked Mr.
Shadduck if Jerry's would allow a clothing store, or a drug store.
Mr. Shadduck said Jerry's would not have a problem with either use.
He added Jerry's would not be favorable to construction of another
grocery store in that area.
Commissioner McClelland told Mr. Shadduck in that area she would be
uncomfortable if a McDonalds or Burger King were to be constructed.
Mr. Shadduck agreed the use of that type of restaurant would be to
extreme, adding that any restaurant use would either be a sit down
or a take out (like chinese) facility with some seating.
Commissioner Ingwalson questioned Mr. Shadduck on who would use the
2
triangle portion indicated on the plan for parking. Mr. Shadduck
said it is their intention that that area of parking be used as bus
and employee parking.
Commissioner Runyan asked Mr. Larsen .what is the parking ratio.
Mr. Larsen said for the proposed use, 5 spaces per 1000.
Commissioner Byron inquired if it is Jerry's intention to enter
into a long term lease agreement with the school district. Mr.
Larsen said that is the intention at this time.
Commissioner Byron questioned development on the north side of
Eden. Mr. Shadduck replied Jerry's does hope to develop this in
the future.
Commisioner McClelland asked Mr. Larsen how locked -in the City is
to development on the north. She added in her opinion this area is
quickly becoming overdeveloped. She asked if we have an option to
just say no to redevelopment.
P
Mr. Larsen responded the Grandview Area Plan does depict this area
for redevelopment. Continuing, Mr. Larsen said the Grandview area
is an area that has been earmarked for redevelopment to better suit
the neighborhood as a whole, for quite some time. He pointed out
many residents of Edina, including near neighbors, feel the area of
Lewis Engineering, and Kunz oil needs to be redeveloped.
Mr. Preston of BRW, Inc. said he is available to answer any
questions the Commission may have regarding traffic.
Commissioner Hale asked Mr. Preston to explain the Link /Eden
intersection. Commissioner Hale said in his opinion, the entrance
should be moved farther down. Commissioners were in agreement that
as proposed the entrance /exit is too close to the Vernon /Link /Eden
area. Mr. Preston said what is proposed is a stop sign as you
leave the parking lot. BRW has also suggested that Eden Avenue be
repainted with one through lane on either side and a middle lane
for storage and turns. He added the entrance /exit could be moved
down from the intersection of Eden /Link /Vernon to accommodate
Commissioner's concerns. He pointed out another option for the
residents on Edenmoor Circle will be to enter and exit through the
parking lot, but cautioned it is their belief that this be used
only for those residents.
A brief discussion ensued regarding traffic flow in the immediate
area.
Commissioner McClelland said she has a real problem regarding
SuperAmerica. She pointed out they have had to completely redesign
their property, and now it seems we are saying road configuration.
will again be changed. It will be much harder to access
SuperAmerica with the proposed changes.
5
Commissioner McClelland pointed out to Mr. Preston, that in an
earlier traffic study done on the Grandview area nine years ago by
BRW, and the one just submitted, one of the numbers in both plans,
is still the same, it hasn't changed. She stressed that that
doesn't seem to make sense, especially the way the Grandview area
has increased in traffic volume. She added she agrees their 8,000
increase in traffic as a result of the current proposal seems
right, but finds it hard to believe that one of the traffic count
numbers remains the same as was indicated nine years earlier.
Mr. Preston responded that he is unsure how the previous numbers
were calculated. He added at that time they may have only
addressed the Grandview area and not the changes in the City of
Edina as a whole.
Ms. Pat Calderon, President of Richmond Hills Neighborhood
Association, told the Commission the neighbors have a generally
favorable view of the proposal and endorse the proposed
development. She asked them to note the residents have three
concerns, they are: 1) store hours, 2) traffic, which is always a
concern, 3) and they recommend that the entrance be located farther
down as suggested by the Commission.
Mr. Doug Laird, resident in the area, told the Commission much has
been done to improve the roadways in the neighborhood. He added he
endorses the suggestion of moving the entry way farther down.
Mr. Joe Collen, resident of Vernon Terrace, told the Commission
that Vernon Terrace is now 90% occupied. He added he is present to
report back to the residents of Vernon Terrace what occurs this
evening. He told the Commission the residents of Vernon Terrace
would like to see Lewis Engineering moved. He pointed out they run
at least two shifts and it can. be extremely loud during the late
evening hours. He asked if this proposal is approved is there a
time frame when Lewis Engineering ceases to operate. Chairman
Runyan said he is unsure of the time frame adding it is hard to
comment on until the project receives approval or denial.
Ms. Calderon told the Commission she has heard a rumor that Lewis
Engineering has chosen a site in Chaska if the proposal is
approved.
Elaine Peterson, resident in the area asked Mr. Shadduck to explain
the elevations on the site. With graphics Mr. Shadduck explained
the elevations of the development.
Commissioner Hale moved to recommend preliminary rezoning approval
subject to staff conditions, and subject to further study of the
south parking lot entrance. Commissioner Ingwalson seconded the
motion. Ayes, Hale, Faust, Shaw, Workinger, Ingwalson, Byron,
Runyan. Nays, McClelland. Motion carried.
6
LOCATION MAP
REZONING
NUMBER Z -90 -5
L 0 C A T10 N 5229 Eden and 5200 Eden Circle
REQUEST Rezone from PID, Planned Industrial District to PC -2,
Planned Commercial District
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
AUGUST 1, 1990
Z -90 -5 Jerry's Enterprises /Opus
PID, Planned Industrial District to
PCD -2, Planned Commercial District
Generally
Located: South of Eden Avenue and west of Soo Line
Railroad tracks
Refer to: Attached site plan, report by Jackson -Scott and
traffic analysis by BRW, Inc., 1987. 1988
Redevelopment proposal by Jerry's Enterprises
The subject property is approximately 8.7 acres in size and is
developed with industrial uses. The Commission will recall that
Jerry's Enterprises presented a redevelopment plan for this area in
1988. A copy of the site plan is attached.
The subject property is within the-Grandview Area Tax Increment
District. In October, 1989, the City Council /HRA authorized staff
to negotiate a redevelopment contract with the developers. The
Council /HRA resolution lasts until August 31, 1990.
The proposed redevelopment is a retail strip mall containing a
total floor area of 145,750 square feet. The main retail area
would contain 106,500 square feet of floor area. The bus garage,
containing 39,250 square feet, would be on the lower level,
adjacent to the railroad tracks.
In order to analyze and use and traffic impacts of the proposed
redevelopment the City /HRA contracted with two outside consultants.
Jackson -Scott and Associates was hired to review the feasibility of
an all- retail development and BRW, Inc. was hired to review the
traffic impact of the development and update the 1984 Grandview
Area Traffic Study. Copies of both reports are attached.
The report by Jackson -Scott questions the feasibility of the
proposed theatre. In response the developers have eliminated the
theatre from the site plan and replaced it with storage for retail
tenants.
The updated traffic study examines the impact of the proposed
development as well as redevelopment of several sites north of Eden
Avenue. The north side redevelopment includes the existing school
bus facility, the car wash and the medical clinic. The
redevelopment would include a mixture of office and retail uses
with a total floor area of approximately 85,000 square feet.
The proposed development would require amending the Comprehensive
Plan and the Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan. The Comprehensive
Plan illustrates the site as industrial and the Redevelopment Plan
as multi - family housing. These amendments have been anticipated.
However, the actual use of the property remains unresolved. The
only Council action on land use has been to endorse a multi - family
housing reuse of the area. Since that action there have been 285
units of multifamily housing constructed in the area. The
Commission in 1988 considered an office - retail redevelopment. That
proposal contained 115,000 square feet of office - retail space and
a free standing 40,000 square foot bus garage.
Recommendation:
Since the last Commission meeting progress has been made on a
redevelopment agreement. We expect to have agreement on key issues
for consideration by the Council /HRA at their August 20, 1990
meeting.
Staff has-become convinced that there is a market for more retail
in this area and that the type of development proposed would be
appropriate for the site. We continue to believe that the
redevelopment south of Eden should be linked to a retail
redevelopment of the existing school bus garage and possibly the
car wash and clinic. The developers agree and are perusing a phase
II project north of Eden Avenue. The project would be similar to
that used in the traffic analysis.
Staff believes that the propsal has merit. We are especially
pleased by the way the bus garage has been integrated into the
development. The elimination of the parking deck and the low scale
of the development are also improvements.
Staff would recommend preliminary approval of the redevelopment
proposal subject to the following conditions:
1. Final Rezoning
2. Plat Approval
3. Amendment of Comprehensive Plan
4. Redevelopment Agreement with the
5. Implementation of Traffic Study
6. Preliminary Plan approval of a
area north of Eden Avenue
and Redevelopment Plan
HRA
recommendations
redevelopment plan for
JSAJACKSON -SCOTT & ASSOCIATES, INC.
3433 Broadway Street N.E.. Suite 150
Minneaoolis. Minnesota 55413
(612) 623 -0153 FAX N (612) 623 -4813
Shopping Center Management. Leasing and Development
The City of Edina Housing and Redevelopment Agency (HRA) has
asked Michael Scott of Jackson -Scott & Associates, Inc. to
evaluate the proposal for the redevelopment of the Grandview Area
Redevelopment District (District) by the proposed developer,
Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. and Opus Corporation (Venture).
To acquaint myself with this project and to provide me with the
background information necessary to complete the analysis, I met
with Mr. Gordon Hughes, Executive Director of the Edina Housing
and Redevelopment Authority and reviewed the proposed Schemes A
and B North and South from the Venture. I also reviewed the BRW
proposed land use alternatives for the District and the Regis
Headquarters Site (Regis Site). Mr. Hughes also provided me with
the latest traffic counts available to the city for Vernon Avenue
and Eden Avenue surrounding the District.
My research also included a meeting with Mr. Christopher Fox,
Senior Vice President of Real Estate for Regis Corporation and
Mr. Jeff Essen, Vice President of Opus Corporation and Ms.
Christine Peterson, Project Director for Opus Corporation.
It is my understanding that the Regis Site of approximately five
acres is zoned commercial and that Regis Corporation requires
additional office space for their own use and are considering
building on their site or relocating and selling their site.
Because this site has a higher profile and is better situated
with Highway 100 exposure, it must be included in the analysis of
the proposed development by the Venture. Any office or retail
development in the District would be impacted by a competing
development on the Regis Site.
REGIS SITE ANALYSIS
The easiest option for the Regis Corporation would be to convert
the Biltmore Bowl into 33,000 square feet of office with adjacent
parking. This would be the most economical for them and would
eliminate the retail potential of the site and also any high -rise
office structure. However, it would not maximize the site to the
highest and best use, create the best tax base for the city or
provide an architectural focal point at the entrance -way to the
city of Edina.
As a second option, Regis could plan to develop their site into a
high -rise office in two phases totaling approximately 150,000
square feet and occupy approximately one -half of the space. The
city could eliminate Arcadia Street and focus access of Hopkins
Road at a signalized intersection. If Regis did not plan any
retail space in the development, it would be compatible with the
proposed retail development by the Venture.
Memow of
�� In;ernatronai Caunen at IIII i fll;
A third option for Regis would be to move their offices from the
site to another location within the city of Edina (they are the
largest company based in Edina) and sell, develop or joint .
venture the development of their site. With the present zoning
on the site, this could be retail or office and might be
competitive with the proposed development by the Venture and
existing retail space in Jerry's Shopping Center. The purchase
of the Regis site by the city of Edina, and relocation of its
City Hall and Community Center to this site near their
maintenance garage, would eliminate the potential of the
competitive development.
DISTRICT SITE ANALYSIS
Scheme A South of the first phase of the retail development
submitted by the Venture proposes a one -level shopping center of
82,025 square feet with a potential lower level of 40,000 square
feet devoted to the bus garage for the city and a four - screen
17,000 square foot theater. This plan is within the boundaries
of the district south of Eden Avenue, essentially taking up the
Lewis site and the Kunz Oil site. Scheme B South includes a West
parcel outside of the District currently occupied by First
Minnesota which would add potential for 12,050 square feet of
additional retail space. Schemes A and B South of Eden Avenue
would thus total 94,075 square feet of retail on grade plus
17,000 square feet of theater and 40,000 square feet for the bus
garage on the lower level.
The Venture proposal for Scheme A North, or an expansion of the
present Jerry's Shopping Center, would add 15,000 square feet for
Jerry's Supermarket expansion, and either a four -story office
structure totaling approximately 84,750 square feet or Scheme B
which would entail a 15,000 square foot Jerry's expansion and a
one -level office /retail expansion of 18,500 square feet, for a
total of 33,850 square feet. Both schemes would require a
two -level ramp below the expanded facility plus surface parking.
In discussion with Mr. Essen and Ms. Peterson of Opus
Corporation, I expressed concern that the retail development in
Scheme A South appeared to rely on the theater as its only anchor
tenant. The theater, in fact, is not proposed to have access or
parking from the main level, but rather only from Eden Circle on
the lower level. My concern is twofold: First, is access off
Eden Circle adequate and will it actually be used by the public
to patronize the theater? Its location is not very visible to
traffic on Vernon Avenue. Second, is the 17,000 square foot
theater an adequate anchor for a 97,025 square. foot shopping
center, excluding the bus garage? Mr. Essen and Ms. Peterson
agreed that the theater would not provide the anchor tenant the
center requires, and said they plan to find one or two anchor
tenants for the endcap spaces of the shopping center on the main, -
level. This would undoubtedly require modification to the
proposed site plan to deepen the retail space for the anchor
store. However, in so doing, it may tend to block the visibility
of the balance of small tenant area in the shopping center. In
addition, a second means of egress for the small tenant area must
be dealt with, as back doors are not possible because of the
elevation difference.
My suggestion would be that the theater be eliminated from the
lower level altogether and in fact no retail space built on the
lower level. If it becomes necessary or is deemed desirable to
have the theater as a tenant in the development, then I believe
it should be free - standing and separate from the balance of the
shopping center. Traditional retail stores and theaters are not
compatible unless they are separated because they compete for the
same parking and the theater patrons monopolize the parking
spaces for two hours or more in the evenings and on weekends when
the shopping center should be busiest.
The proposed tenant mix for the shopping center will probably not
be traditional retail stores found in the Southdale Center area
or boutique -type stores such as those found at 50th and France
Avenue. Also, any popular priced or discount store retailer
would not be appropriate in the development. Therefore, the
tenant mix should probably be oriented to destination specialty
stores and service and convenience oriented stores to serve the
strong trade area west of Highway 100.
CONCLUSIONS,AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The District site as a retail development should function and be
successful under the following conditions: First, development of
the Regis Site plan must be determined and not be predominately
retail; second, the Venture's plan for the South Scheme should
only be developed with two anchor tenants of at least 15,000
square feet or more; third, the theater should be eliminated from
the development because it is questionable whether it will be
successful on the lower level. If it is placed on the main level
it will not act as an anchor for the retail development; fourth,
the West parcel (First Minnesota site) should not be added to
Scheme A since it is too remote and does not add anything to the
proposed development and may in fact obstruct visibility of the
proposed development. The expansion of Jerry's Supermarket under
the Scheme A North plan should be encouraged, as Jerry's provides
a focal point for the entire retail project. If the District was
expanded to include the clinic parcel, then the office proposed
in Scheme A North could be used in part for the clinic physicians
and their parcel used to provide improved parking and visibility
for the expansion.
The city should consider granting the Venture an option on the
District site for approximately six months in order to resolve
the site plan, find two anchors for the retail project and
pre -lease the entire center to an acceptable level of
approximately 60 %. This will ensure the center is properly
designed and that there is a market for the retail space. The
city should also work with Regis Corporation during this option
period to determine their development plans and ensure that they
are not competitive with the proposed development by the Venture
in the District. The city should try to obtain a commitment from
Jerry's for their expansion under the Scheme A North plan within
a reasonable time period to complete the overall development.
With these safeguards, this project as a retail center should be
successful.
August 1, 1990
Robert N. Shadduck
Jerry's Enterprises, Inc.
City Of Edina
City Planning Commission
Dear Associates:
Bob Worthington
Opus Corporation
Christine Peterson
Opus Corporation
As President of the Richmond Hills Association, I am writing this
letter, as representative of our neighborhood, to express our
concerns regarding the Lewis Engineering site proposal.
Through the efforts of Bob Shadduck of Jerry's Enterprise,
Bob Worthington and Christine Peterson of Opus Corporation, we
have been well informed about the proposal which is before you
this evening. They have furnished us with an overall layout and
perspective drawing of the proposal and its possible appearance,
elevations, and a traffic analysis.
The Richmond Hills Association, as a whole, find this proposal
very feasible and adaptable to the area. We feel this will have
a very positive affect on the neighborhood. The only real
concerns we have regarding this proposal are, 1) the hours that
the shopping area will be open,,.2) the amount of traffic that
would flow into Eden Circle, if any, and 3) the traffic
congestion along Eden Avenue from the proposed entrance and exit.
We are completely in favor of the removal of Lewis Engineering,
being that the sight, noise, and dust created from this area is
somewhat annoying and that it can no longer be considered an
industrial site. We are also pleased to know that the School
District will finally have a pleasant working area that will
definitely-be upgraded from its present location.
Overall we are very optimistic regarding
that will be taking place within the next
looking forward to the improvement in the
Re sp tful ,
Patricia A. Calderon
President, RicYd Hills Association
the aesthetic changes
year or two, and are
area.
imc sheltered
SA
=rr-
DATE: August 20, 1990
Designers & Administrators of
Pension, Profit Sharing &
Executive Compensation Plans
TO: Community Development and Planning Commission
FROM: Theodore Giannobile, Owner
TSC Office Building
5244 Eden Circle
Edina, MN 55436
RE: Preliminary Rezoning, PID, Planned Industry District,
to PCD -2, Planned Commercial District
Please be advised that the TSC Office Building is adjacent
to the proposed commercial rezoning by Opus Corp /Jerry's En-
terprises.
The TSC Office Building is comprised of 5700 square feet of
office space (main floor) and 5700 square feet warehouse space
(lower level).
We have notified the City of Edina and Jerry's Enterprises
during the past two years of our need for additional parking
space in the back of our building to accommodate our office
space and warehouse space parking needs.
Our request for additional parking space would enable our
building to provide a more aesthetic appearance, as well as
a compatible useage as part of this proposed development.
The proposed plan was not communicated to me and has not con-
sidered our specific needs. I recently met with the developer,
Robert Shattuck, who said that my request will be reviewed
again, but that there is not sufficient parking space to ac-
commodate our needs as part of their development and rezoning
request.
I hereby request that the preliminary rezoning proposal not
be granted until the TSC Office Building needs are specifically
addressed by the Applicant and City of Edina.
TG /d1k
TSC office building 5244 eden circle edina, mn 55436 612-920-2261
L -L
T-77-7
I A
T1 1
J L--
A
. ..... . . . . . . . . . . . .
F
7--j
7T
� Flu � 's.. y.:'/ -7.
t.A
I.P
ZH
't.n
GRANDVOK ONA www
Li
Cl-
j
i l-- ��
117 1111
I
KcyzcmTtft-
4.9--t
MIN I
. . . . . . . . . .
KE
GRANDVIEW. EDM
ti
T—I T—T—T-7-T! I
II
J�-
SEE ��_: -�
a sue. - -_ % /';� ® it _'°�....,.���L i
— -----------
- ��r- -1 ;'�r;' i - � � -, of - � �J :�.
T
4. Jo
i �� �_� -� _;�:� i L�RO tr a1� / t AcAft
CJWZVW-.V. ED NA
HIM I I
I
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
ON 1988 REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL BY JERRY'S ENTERPRISES
development is very a
n ue will do
site. ommissioner McClelland also asked Mr, sen if the
Collins site would become non - conforming as a result of t oss of parking
spaces. Mr. Larsen stated the widening of France Aven ill have a direct
impact on the Collins site, if the proposal is appr the Collins site could be
incorporated into the 7100 France Avenue site and roof of parking agreement
could be placed over both parcels. In respons Commissioner McClellands
question the Collins site at present is non orming, the widening of France
- -- 4-#_ - -- -- -r - - -
f
Commissioner Shaw said she i ng to grasp the valid points of this
proposal, she added in her opi a widening of France Avenue should not be a
factor in a decision making s. She also said she is sympathetic with the
tenants of the building b is a private matter and should not be a factor
in reaching a decision. y tenants will have to work with the new property
owner. Commissioner aid she cannot support the proposal. Commissioner
McClelland said in pinion a change in the concentration of commercial /retail
in specific area; omething that should be carefully considered and this
proposal may p.floodgates" if there is a change from that general
concentrati
C ioner Palmer moved to recommend denial of the proposal on the basis
that contrar to the Com nsive Plan and the Commission feels that
er D. Johnson
on. a in a
III. NEW BUSINESS
Z -88 -3 Planned Industrial District, PID
to Planned Commercial District, PCD -2
5229 Eden Avenue, 5220 Eden Avenue and
5200 Eden Circle
3 &
S -88 -3 Preliminary Plat Approval for
Jerry's Enterprises
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the subject proposal comprises several
parcels located both north and south of Eden Avenue. The project proposes the
redevelopment of the Edina School District bus garage north of Eden and the
Lewis Engineering and Kunz Oil sites south of Eden Avenue. All of the parcels
are in the Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment District. The
project area is approximately 10 acres in size.
Mr. Larsen added all of the project area is currently zoned Planned
Industrial District, PID. The proposal retains the PID Zoning on the southerly
portions of the site where a new bus garage complex for the school district
would be developed. The remainder of the site would be rezoned PCD -2 to
accommodate office - retail uses. North of Eden, on what is now the bus garage, a
retail building containing approximately 45,600 square feet would be
constructed. The one level building would be at the same level as, and
connected to the existing Jerry's Super Market. The building would be
constructed over a two level parking structure containing 228 parking spaces.
South of Eden the project proposes an office - retail complex containing
approximately 114,400 square feet of floor area. Parking for the complex would
be provided in a two- level, 572 space parking ramp. The building complex
includes a two story retail- office building, a seven story office building, and
a small bank building. The project proposes a skyway connection spanning Eden
Avenue.
Mr. Larsen pointed out-the PCD -2 zoning district has a 4 story limit on
building height. The_-offica- huilding is proposed at 7: stories, thus a 3 story
height variance is requested. The project would comply with all other
requirements in the PCD -2 district, and the redeveloped bus garage would comply
with the requirements of the PID district.
Mr. Larsen explained the 1980 Comprehensive Plan suggested that the
Grandview Area be studied and that a redevelopment district be established. In
1984 the Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment Financing District
were adopted by the City's Housing and Redevelopment Authority, HRA. The
primary goals of the District were to create additional public parking, to
provide needed roadway improvements, and to redevelop the non - conforming land
uses along Eden Avenue. In 1985, BRW, prepared a land use study of the
Grandview Area. A key element of this study was the redevelopment potential of
the Eden Avenue area. The BRW study suggested the area south of Eden Avenue
could be redeveloped for office - warehouse uses or could be developed as
multi - family residential with a density of 25 to 30 units per acre. The study
suggested redevelopment of the school bus garage with an office use. In 1986
the Commission gave concept approval for a 210 unit apartment building south of
Eden.
Planning the redevelopment along Eden Avenue has been complicated by the
school's bus garage. Staff has met with school officials several times since
1984 to discuss the possible relocation of the bus garage. No suitable site was
found until now. The subject proposal, has been reviewed by School
Administration and by the School Boards Planning Committee and has their
support. The proposal will be reviewed by the full Board in the near future.
Mr. Larsen pointed out the assumed permanence of the school garage in its
present location limited the range of land use possibilities for the area south
of Eden. Including the bus garage in the redevelopment creates an opportunity
to connect the development on the south side of Eden to the existing retail '
complex north of Eden. This increases the range of suitable land uses for the
area.
In 1984, in connection with a redevelopment proposal for the Biltmore
Motel, BRW conducted a traffic study of the Grandview area. The study
recommended a number of street and intersection improvements to reduce conflicts
and improve traffic flow in the area. In late 1987 the City Council authorized
the first major improvement recommended by the study. The improvement includes
closing the Eden, Sherwood, Eden Circle intersection with Vernon, the widening
of Link Road, the signalization of the Link Road, Vernon Avenue intersection.
This project will be completed in 1988. The City has contracted with BRW to
review and update the findings and recommendations of their 1984 study. The
proposed project incorporates the authorized improvements in the site plan.
Mr. Larsen concluded the proposed redevelopment represents an excellent
opportunity for the Grandview Area and the entire City. The key element is the
ability of the developer to find a solution to the problem of the school bus
garage. The result is a project that creates a relationship between uses north
and south of Eden. The visual character of the area will be greatly enhanced by
this redevelopment. Although the retail components of this proposal were not
anticipated by the Comprehensive Plan or the BRW land use study staff believes
that the scope of this redevelopment proposal and its relationship to existing
retail uses changes some basic assumptions of earlier plans and that amending
the plans..is appropriate in;wlightiof current circumstances � - z .s-
r: ecommended.°-Pi &lihifiidry-R;ii-zbhiii-g�'..-diid�Pf6liminary Plat approval and
Amendment of the Comprehensive Plan and Grandview Area Plan to illustrate the
proposed land uses with the following conditions:
1) Final Rezoning and Final Plat Approval.
2) Approval of a Redevelopment Contract by the City Council between
the HRA, the Developer, and the School District.
3) Results of the updated traffic study by BRW
4) That the 7 story office building be reduced to a maximum of 4 stories.
Mr. Robert Shaddock representing Jerry's Enterprises and Mr. Arthur Dickey
of Dickey Architects were present. Interested neighbors were present.
Mr. Shaddock told the Commission he believes this proposal is a plus for
the neighborhood. He added representatives of Jerry's Enterprises met with
members of the school district and the response was very positive concerning the
relocation of the Edina school bus garage.
Commissioner Del Johnson said he sees some positive changes for the area as
a result of this plan. Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Larsen about the
re- location of the school bus garage and how the city financially would enter
into it. Mr. Larsen said the present school bus garage site would be moved to
the proposed site in what could be considered a land swap. A solution to
funding the proposal could possibly include the HRA. An exact formula for this
solution has not been worked out but staff is optimistic that something can be
worked out.
The following residents expressed their concerns regarding the proposal:
Mr. R. Rosch, 5248 Richwood Drive, Mr. Laird, 5232 Edenmoor Street, Mr. T.
Gionanable, of TSC Office Building, Mr. and Mrs. Ron Cohen, 5213 Richwood
Drive, Mr. S. Ullom, 5229 Richwood Road, Mr. Stortz, 5240 Richwood Drive, Elaine
Peterson, 5236 Edenmoor Street. Their concerns are outlined as follows:
1) Increase in traffic flow. Residents pointed out the neighborhood has'
experienced a marked increase in traffic as a direct result of the Edina Girls
Gymnastic Association being housed in their neighborhood. Any added traffic
would stress an already stressful traffic situation. At times it is impossible
to "get out ".
2) Traffic Safety. Many residents of the neighborhood enjoy walking and their
children enjoy the close location of a City park. An increase in traffic would
pose a safety hazard.
3) Exhaust fumes from the buses may pose a potential health hazard. Visual
pollution will be felt from the proposed 7 story office building. A 7 story
office building is unacceptable.
4) The proposed location of the new bus garage has a negative direct impact on
residents: whose property is in close proximity to.the proposed location.
And..... is the school district financially capable -of paying for a new bus
garage?
5) Parking. The present parking is less than desirable. City buses now use
Eden Road and Link Road to park on.
6) The location of commercial zoning where presently industrial /office zoning
is located.
Mr. Shaddock said Jerry's Enterprises is willing to look at reducing the 7
story office building _to the required 4 story office building height.
Commissioner Runyan told the residents he shares many of their concerns.
Since it has been implied that Jerry's Enterprises is willing to look at
reducing the 7 story office building to 4 stories one concern has been
addressed. Commissioner Runyan asked Mr. Larsen if a traffic study has been
done. Mr. Larsen said BRW will be conducting a traffic study of the area during
the week of April 13th. Commissioner Palmer said before an educated decision is
made the Commission should have copies of the traffic study from BRW.
Commissioner McClelland expressed concern regarding the commercial aspect of
this proposal and felt the Commission needs more time to review the proposal and
study the traffic report. Commissioner Paulus said another concern that Jerry's
Enterprises should address is the possible re- design of the bus garage
placement. A design plan should be developed to reduce the impact to the
neighbors. Commissioner D. Johnson said he is in agreement with members of the
Commission that this issue should be held over for at least 30 days to allow the
proponent time to study the concerns expressed by the Commission and residents
of the area and for BRW to compile the results of the traffic study.
Commissioner D. Johnson moved to hold over the proposal allowing the
proponent time to study the issues raised at this meeting and the Commission to
receive a report from BRW regarding the traffic study. Commissioner Palmer
seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion carried.
aurr -ana x Avenue
Lot , Block 2, Two Oaks
Mr. La the Commission the applicant represents the
who wo o transfer an an? :-• - ^ *��•- ^ °' - -- "° " "���
properties.
r of Lot 8
of
with an
v�
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
HELD ON APRIL 27, 1988, AT 7:30 P.M.
EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
2 ER PRESENT: Chairman William Lewis, Lee Johnson, John Bailey, Helen
McClelland, Del Johnson, Join Palmer, Jane Paulus,,
Virginia Shaw and Gordon Johnson
MMD�ERS AB &ENT ,David, Runyan and GeofuWorkin erg . w�
- ' -...-
iF�..- 7^...�s.; .,::w''a�. a >s G �'r �' �=' � � mss- r ii7..�t u � �! y.` s"' cJ'. -• -.. >: 1 rus- ,...:;. ...
STAFF`"
PRESENT. ` ,,,x Craig— Ia=sen�:CitpwPlaaaer >Y "c�
Fran Hoffman, City Engineer
Jackie Hoogenakker, Planning Secretary
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES:
Commissioner Paulus moved for approval of the March 30, 1988 Community
Development and Planning Commission Meeting Minutes. Commissioner D. Johnson
seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion carried.
II. OLD BUSINESS:
Z -88 -3 Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. Rezoning and Preliminary Plat
& Approval. PID, Planned Industrial District to PCD 72,
P -88 -1 Planned Commercial District.
Mr. Larsen explained to the Commission the proponent has revised plans to
address your concerns and the concerns of the residents. The revised plans
address access to and use of Sherwood Avenue, the height of the office building,
and the design and location of the school bus garage.
Mr. Larsen said representatives from Jerry's Enterprises and BRW are
present to speak regarding the proposed changes.
Mr. Robert Shadduck, Mr. Arthur Dickey, were present representing Jerry's
Enterprises. Mr. Howard Preston, BRW was present. Interested residents were
present.
Commissioner Shaw arrived.
Mr. Howard Preston began his presentation by giving the Commission
background on the Grandview Area. He explained to the Commission the site in
question was identified for redevelopment a number of years ago. He added when
BRW studied this site it was considered for office. With the aid of graphics
Mr. Preston pointed out the differences in trip generation increases between the
proposal and the original office concept. He added the increase in traffic is
due to the proposed retail use on the site. Mr. Preston concluded his .
presentation noting the proposal would generate an increase in traffic but with
the proposed road improvements in the area already in progress the impact would
be minimal. He recommended that special consideration should be given to
providing a system of left turn lanes along Eden Avenue (between the railroad
overpass and Link Road) in order to better accommodate the increased number of
vehicles turning left. Eden Avenue could be re- striped to accommodate this
recommendation.
Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Larsen if the City has any plans at
present to widen Eden Avenue. Mr. Larsen responded that at this time the City
has no plans to widen Eden Avenue. Commissioner McClelland commented that she
is not convinced that Eden Avenue can handle the increase in traffic even with
renovations /improvements. Commissioner Bailey agreed with Commissioner
McClelland's observation adding he can foresee a possible stacking problem on
ommrssroner.:.MeCYelland `pointed out'rhe' he'avy=busW us'e on the roadways in
question. Mr. Preston acknowledged that a large number of buses can lower the
capacity of roadways. Commissioner McClelland commented that traffic statistics
on paper may appear to work but the reality may be quite different.' Mr. F.
Hoffman explained that Link Road will be re -built and signalized at Vernon
Avenue. These improvements should reduce congestion and improve the traffic
flow. Mr. Hoffman added there still are concerns regarding traffic, but with
further study they can be reduced. Mr. Larsen explained that part of the
problem with the stack -up of cars on Link Road is Super America. Once that area
has been redesigned the problem should be lessened. Mr. Hoffman added the MTC
buses will not be using that area.
Mr. Robert Shadduck pointed out with graphics the changes in the revised
plans. He asked the Commission to note the re- arrangement of the bus garage,
the location of the office and the reduction from 7 stories to 5 stories in the
height of the office building. Commissioner L. Johnson asked Mr. Shadduck if
the proposed office building height is reduced to 4 stories would there be an
enlargement in the buildings footprint. Mr. Shadduck responded that the
footprint would be enlarged to maintain the proposed square footage of the
building. Commissioner McClelland stressed she is very uncomfortable with
allowing retail on the south side of Eden Avenue. Commissioner Paulus asked Mr.
Shadduck if retail space is needed with office space on the south side of Eden
Avenue. Mr. Shadduck explained the intent of the proposal is to have the
building split, 50% office, 50% retail. He said he believes retail is needed to
make the project economically feasible. Mr. Shadduck added the retail concept
is for small stores possibly containing a barber, beauty shop, dentist, children
and women's clothing stores etc. He said each store would probably be 1,500
square feet or less. He explained the proposal is for a neighborhood retail
area that would meet neighborhood needs.
Commissioner D. Johnson excused himself from the meeting.
Members of the neighborhood expressed views and concerns on the proposal.
Mr. D. Getsch , 5233 Richwood Drive stated he opposes commercial development
south of Eden Avenue, citing it is not in keeping with the Comprehensive Land
Use Plan, he recommended a reduction in the office buildings height from the
proposed 5 stories to 4 stories. Mr. Getsch recommended further study on the
impact of retail south of Eden Avenue as it relates to traffic flow, and the
continuation of road improvements and renovations for the area. Mr. Ron Cohen,
5213 Richwood Drive, told the Commission he would like to see a plan that shows
the landscaping, he also asked the Commission to note that he opposes retail on
the south side of Eden Avenue. Mr. Cohen suggested that the office building be
moved more toward the east. Mr. Richard Peterson, 5236 Edenmoor Avenue
expressed concern that the value of his home may be reduced, he also expressed
concern that the school district has not given any indication they can afford a
new bus garage. Commissioner McClelland said she agrees with Mr. Peterson's
observation regarding the school district. She added she would like to have
something more concrete from them regarding the issue of the bus garage. Mr.
Shadduck told the Commission and residents there is a possibility that the
height of the building could be reduced to 4 stories and the office building
moved to meet the needs of the residents, but this would take further study. He
said they are working with the school district, the;Boar- .dam - embers have ;e
expressed suppotu for th �'
-
- -
' °' The -discussion continued with Commission Members expressing concern over
retail on the south side of Eden Avenue, increased traffic with the
recommendation that further study be given to the difference between retail and
office as it relates to traffic. They added they would like to see a reduction
in the height of the office building and new plans that would show the increased
buildings footprint if the height is reduced. Commission Members also
recommended that they receive more information from the school district
regarding the bus garage.
Commissioner L. Johnson moved to recommend denial due to the lack of
supporting traffic information that would justify commercial uses south of Eden
Avenue. Commissioner G. Johnson seconded the motion.
Commissioner Paulus stated she feels this project has alot of merit and
asked if the Commission would consider a motion for approval with conditions.
After a brief discussion the Commission indicated they were uncomfortable
with a motion for approval with conditions when there are so many unanswered
questions. The stated they would like more information enabling them to make a
educated decision.
Commissioner Palmer recommended the simplest way would be to recommend a
straight denial.
Commissioner L. Johnson withdrew his motion.
Commissioner L. Johnson moved to recommend denial based on the comments
presented this evening. Commisioner McClelland seconded the motion.
Commisioner W. Lewis abstained. All were in favor. The motion carried.
Z -88 -2
Preliminary e -
& Harvey Swenson. R JLUK
-1, Sin I�for
S -88 -2 PRD -2, planned Re nit District to
southeast t• Generally located
ue and west of Shervood.
Mr. Larsen to ssion the subject p y
1 1/2 acre is currently developed with two sir
nglefamilyrhomes.
The p fists of 3 lots latte
dle
ue on
F
Cme 141 -Rh Pukiea arhe
West Elevation -Eden South
CommmiallOffire
Parking
f.. ✓ J
c
Q Ell
�3
West Elevation -Eden North
tden Avenue
Site Elevation
/'i EXISTING
PARKING RAMP
-
/ L' j
EXISTING C _
JF:RNYS ENTERPRISES > -
m _
Commercial! -
2 Stories of Parking I
Below I /
�Jnk Rod
R nil
� -
t
i I F. di
Elea'. WaJ I
�. /� Koll:niaerap
- i
Eden Circle — - - -- r
EDEN NORTH
` Commercial 15.600 SIP /e rto�rw
v l Perking 228 spaces �.
�
FDFN L SMTH Odin 9aeN4 / I i
mm
Coerclaboffice 111.100 SIF / /e 0 Iwo 60 170
Perking 572 space I i
- - - -- � I�� -- -- - --- - -- � � i KEY
canmerc auorfice I I60.Y00 Sr / Q EXISTING
Parking 800'aplee Q EDEN NORTH
i /
err. Gauge
47 maKll 6b se s I EDEN SOUTH
1 vam /
1 dump trust
I I Bus Repainwast I I � ARTHUR OK,7CEY ARtrFIfTECIS INC
—Bus
Garage Office /Storage WIDNwiaa r 90
Parting Cara Y2420.3m
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
MARCH 30, 1988
Z -88 -3 Planned Industrial District, PID
to Planned Commercial District, PCD -2
.. �. ��,,.. �,��.i+s�`�'r.�*�� �Ff-`'T�u.. '� .�a, ,, ,� ^a � �. ._.. •F,a� �.- *o-� -. cc:'Y3 ryr -.." .,��.. --•
S 88"3 3 ;Pl
4 x P,:rel nary:, = at Approva
mi ` w K
Jerry's Enterprises
General Location: North and south of Eden Avenue, west of Brookside
Avenue and Soo Line Rail Tracks.
The subject proposal comprises several parcels located both north and south
of Eden Avenue. The project proposes the redevelopment of the Edina School
District bus garage north of Eden and the Lewis Engineering and Kunz Oil sites
south of Eden Avenue. All of the parcels are in the Grandview Area Redevelopment
Plan and Tax Increment District. The project area is approximately 10 acres in
size.
All of the project area is currently zoned Planned Industrial District, PID.
The proposal retains the PID Zoning on the southerly portions of the site where a
new bus garage complex for the school district would be developed. The remainder
of the site would be rezoned PCD -2 to accommodate office - retail uses. North of
Eden, on what is now the bus garage, a retail building containing approximately
45,600 square feet would be constructed. The one level building would be at the
same level as, and connected to the existing Jerry's Super Market. The building
would be constructed over a two level parking structure containing 228 parking
spaces. South of Eden the project proposes an office - retail complex containing
approximately 114,400 square feet of floor area. Parking for the complex would
be provided in a two - level, 572 space parking ramp. The building complex
includes a two story retail- office building, a seven story office building, and a
small bank building. The project proposes a skyway connection spanning Eden
Avenue.
The PCD -2 zoning district has a 4 story limit on building height. The
office building is proposed at 7 stories, thus a 3 story height variance is
requested. The project would comply with all other requirements in the PCD -2
district, and the redeveloped bus garage would comply with the requirements of
the PID district.
The 1980 Comprehensive Plan suggested that the Grandview Area be studied and
that a redevelopment district be established. In 1984 the Grandview Area
Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment Financing District were adopted by the
City's Housing and Redevelopment Authority, HRA. The primary goals of the
District were to create additional public parking, to provide needed 'roadway
improvements, and to redevelop the non - conforming land uses along Eden Avenue.
In 1985, BRW, prepared a land use study of the Grandview Area. A key element of
this study was the redevelopment potential of the Eden Avenue area. The BRW
study suggested the area south of Eden Avenue could be redeveloped for
office - warehouse uses or could be developed as multi - family residential with a
density of 25 to 30 units per acre. The study suggested redevelopment of the
school bus garage with an office use. In 1986 the Commission gave concept
approval for a 210 unit apartment building south of Eden.
Planning the redevelopment along Eden Avenue has been complicated by the
school's bus garage. Staff has met with school officials several times since
1984 to discuss the'possible relocation of the bus garage. No suitable was found
until now. The subject proposal has been reviewed by School Administration and
by the School Boards Planning Committee and has their support The— proposal will
k
be reviewed by�;the fulFls e-�n r-�f ure - -- - • - �-
- Board in th ea ut
The assumed permanence of the school garage in its present location limited
the range of land use possibilities for the area south of Eden. Including the
bus garage in the-redevelopment creates an opportunity to connect the development
on the south side of Eden to the existing retail complex north of Eden. This
increases the range of suitable land uses for the area.
In 1984, in connection' with a redevelopment proposal for the Biltmore Motel,
BRW conducted a traffic study of the Grandview area. The study recommended a
number of street and intersection improvements to reduce conflicts and improve
traffic flow in the area. In late 1987 the City Council authorized the first
major improvement recommended by the study. The improvement includes closing the
Eden, Sherwood, Eden Circle intersection with Vernon, the widening of Link Road,
the signalization of Link Road, Vernon Avenue intersection. This project will be
completed in 1988. The City has contracted with BRW to review and update the
findings and recommendations of their 1984 study. The proposed project
incorporates the authorized improvements in the site plan.
Recommendation
The proposed redevelopment represents an excellent opportunity for the
Grandview Area and the entire City. The key element is the ability of the
developer to find a solution to the problem of the school bus garage. The result
is a project that creates a relationship between uses north and south of Eden.
The visual character of the area will be greatly enhanced by this redevelopment.
Although the retail components of this proposal were not anticipated by the
Comprehensive Plan or the BRW land use study we believe that the scope of this
redevelopment proposal and its relationship to existing retail uses changes some
basic assumptions of earlier plans and that amending the plans is appropriate in
_light of current circumstances.
Staff recommends Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Plat approval and
Amendment of the Comprehensive Plan and Grandview Area Plan to illustrate the
proposed land uses with the following conditions:
1) Final Rezoning and Final Plat Approval.
2) Approval of a Redevelopment Contract by the City Council between
the HRA, the Developer, and the School District.
3) Results of the updated traffic study by BRW
4. That the 7 story office building be reduced to a maximum of 4 stories.
=rr-
DATE: September 4, 1990
TO: Craig Larson, City Planner
City of Edina
FROM: Theodore Giannobile
ITEM: IV. B.
Designers &. Administrators of
Pension, Profit Sharing &.
Executive Compensation Plans
RE: TSC Office Building Parking Needs
and the Proposed Adjacent Jerry's of Edina Real Estate Development
Last week I visited with Robert Shattuck, the project developer for Jerry's
Enterprises, regarding the TSC Office Building's dire need for parking space
which could be accommodated as part of their real estate development.
The attached schematic shows an area between the back of the TSC Office Build-
ing and their proposed building that ideally could be used for parking.
An appropriate variance from the normal building setback would be required
from your office and the City of Edina.
The estimated 16 parking spaces in this area would enable the TSC Office
Building to be remodeled for better use and appearance for the entire project.
Mr. Shattuck has tentatively told me that, assuming there would be no impact
on their proposed development, an easement could be granted to us in order
to use this space for TSC Office Building parking.
I would appreciate your review of this request to accomplish two objectives:
Improve the appearance of the property in the back of our building as part
of the redevelopment, and provide us with urgently- needed parking spaces.
TG /dlk
Attachment
o �1g5
TSC office building 5244 eden circle edina, mn 55436 612-920-2261
50 J
.,I Inc I/�i�a I�IKI���I Isle I�Icl�lsl
.+ TTTTTT
i
I
s
7',c-c- 07-1--7CAE-
P4a1«1V6 LrlT
LIryIS4)
/l, ✓Fw J
T
JERRY'S FOODS
E3
t rt
3{
s
R
I t
f.
R ,£E 3781586 ST,
8. ACRES)
a
L 1, TM
63,M xy.
cl-
wX� � By,
c.. i, ; ,4R3 $HAFTS, ETC..
s;uclo a T,
T L 2,
of" 5'X sy,
q
�
x , c
}}
}
#:
fi
i^
X
i
a
G
3
t «
A
157,150 .
r
£ ..:,,....�,>
„r,
x.cm,.w.�,w.:?„w�• +,; +_.�+, v,.�:� -. »:. s� :+:+»... ,ma ea:�w:.,•.ra '
i
145,7150 �
. a:� 3
PARKING S'
3
x
g
as 1 t x AREA
o'5M,S
,s. :g''}5 d
�
4
3y
5
y pg
+6
�W�y
4
1
ry
„m „ ��
i }
s
R
I t
f.
R ,£E 3781586 ST,
8. ACRES)
a
L 1, TM
63,M xy.
wX� � By,
c.. i, ; ,4R3 $HAFTS, ETC..
s;uclo a T,
T L 2,
of" 5'X sy,
fi
i^
X
tn
A
157,150 .
lu
s
,s v
R, i
145,7150 �
. a:� 3
3
g
as 1 t x AREA
o'5M,S
,s. :g''}5 d
x P
y pg
+6
�W�y
NG D A T A
'LG REC,11,11 RED
CL
r
�i ��e
co
CD
I:=�. •�-,i_ I
=rr-
DATE: September 4, 1990
TO: Craig Larson, City Planner
City of Edina
FROM: Theodore Giannobile
ITEM: IV. B.
Designers & Administrators of
Pension, Profit Sharing &
Executive Compensation Plans
RE: TSC Office Building Parking Needs
and the Proposed Adjacent Jerry's of Edina Real Estate Development
Last week I visited with Robert Shattuck, the project developer for Jerry's
Enterprises, regarding the TSC Office Building's dire need for parking space
which could be accommodated as part of their real estate development.
The attached schematic shows an area between the back of the TSC Office Build-
ing and their proposed building that ideally could be used for parking.
An appropriate variance from the normal building setback would be required
from your office and the City of Edina.
The estimated 16 parking spaces in this area would enable the TSC Office
Building to be remodeled for better use and'appearance for the entire project.
Mr. Shattuck has tentatively told me that, assuming there would be no impact
on their proposed development, an easement could be granted to us in order
to use this space for TSC Office Building parking.
I would appreciate your review of this request to accomplish two objectives:
Improve the appearance of the property in the back of our building as part
of the redevelopment, and provide us with urgently- needed parking spaces.
TG /dlk
Attachment
o L 199A
�+C 0
TSC office building 5244 eden circle edina, mn 55436 612-920-2261
N
I�
l
50 d
�� L-
R � ✓FW
f
DATE: September 4, 1990
TO: Edina City Council
FROM: Pat Calderon, President Richmond Hills Association
SUBJECT: Report /Recommendation on Rezoning Jerry's
Enterprises /Opus, Z -90 -5 (Lewis Engineering)
Regarding tonight's meeting on the above subject, I am enclosing
a letter that was addressed to the City Planning Commission.
Since the meeting on August 1, 1990 I have not been confronted by
any of my neighbors regarding the change from PID, Planned
Industrial District to PCD -2 Planned Commercial District. As you
can see from the enclosed letter we are completely in favor of
the removal of Lewis Engineering and that this area can no longer
be considered an industrial site.
We are looking forward to the changes in this area but realize
that there are several- conditions associated with this
recommendation.
We are aware of the traffic problems that are being addressed
with this change and the need for a preliminary or concept
approval of a Redevelopment Plan which will involve the car wash,
the medical clinic, and the existing bus garage.
To finish this memo I would like to express the opinions of most
of the neighborhood in eliminating the concept of an office -
showroom or multifamily housing area at the proposed site. Our
other major concern is the elimination of excess traffic in the
Sherwood Drive and Eden Circle area close to our neighborhood.
We are in favor of improvement in this area and hopefully that a
feasible traffic analysis will complete this proposed
development.
cc: Robert N. Shadduck
Bob Worthington
Christine Peterson
City Planning Commission
Richmond Hills Neighborhood
August 1, 1990
Robert N. Shadduck
Jerry's Enterprises, Inc.
City Of Edina
City Planning Commission
Dear Associates:
Bob Worthington
Opus Corporation
Christine Peterson
Opus Corporation
As President of the Richmond Hills Association, I am writing this
letter, as representative of our neighborhood, to express our
concerns regarding the Lewis Engineering site proposal.
Through the efforts of Bob Shadduck of Jerry's Enterprise,
Bob Worthington and Christine Peterson of Opus Corporation, we
have been well informed about the proposal which is before you
this evening. They have furnished us with an overall layout and
perspective drawing of the proposal and its possible appearance,
elevations, and a traffic analysis.
The Richmond Hills Association, as a whole, find this proposal
very feasible and adaptable to the area. We feel this will have
a very positive affect on the neighborhood. The only real
concerns we have regarding this proposal are, 1) the hours that
the shopping area will be open, 2) the amount of traffic that
would flow into Eden Circle, if any, and 3) the traffic
congestion along Eden Avenue from the proposed entrance and exit.
We are completely in favor of the removal of Lewis Engineering,
being that the sight, noise, and dust created from this area is
somewhat annoying and that it can no longer be considered an
industrial site. We are also pleased to know that the School
District will finally have a pleasant working area that will
definitely be upgraded from its present location.
Overall we are very optimistic regarding
that will be taking place within the next
looking forward to the improvement in the
Respectfully,
Patricia A. Calderon
President, Richmond Hills Association
the aesthetic changes
year or two, and are
area.
s
A.
ieaB
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To. KENNETH ROSLAND
Agenda Item #
Iy.
C.
From: CRAIG LARSEN
Consent
0
Information Only
Date: SEPTEMBER 4, 1990
Mgr. Recommends
To HRA
Subject: CDBG AGREEMENT WITH
To Council
HENNEPIN COUNTY
Action
❑
Motion
0
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Authorize execution of agreement by Mayor and Manager.
INFO /BACKGROUND
The attached agreement with Hennepin County establishes procedures for
the use of CDBG Funds. This is the same agreement we have for each year of
the program.
Contract No. M 55 a D
SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT
URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the COUNTY OF
HENNE�,PIN, State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as "RECIPIENT," and the
� of jn 2_ , hereinafter referred to as " SUBRECIPIENT,"
said'parties to this Agreement each being governmental units of the State of
Minnesota, and is made pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59:
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, Recipient has received a Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) entitlement allocation under Title I of the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1974, as amended, to carry out various community develop-
ment activities in cooperation with Subrecipient; and
WHEREAS, $ -3-2 '71,3 from Federal Fiscal Year 1990 CDBG funds has been
approved by Recipient for use by Subrecipient for the implementation of
eligible and fundable community development activity/ies as included in and a
part of the 1990 Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds, Urban
Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant program and as set forth in
the Statement of Work described in Exhibit 1 to this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Subrecipient agrees to assume certain responsibilities for
the implementation of the approved activities described in Exhibit 1, said
responsibilities being specified in part in the Joint Cooperation Agreement
executed between Recipient and Subrecipient and in the 1990 Statement of
Objectives and Projected Use of Funds, Urban Hennepin County CDBG program and
the Certifications contained therein.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereunto do hereby agree as follows:
1. The Subrecipient shall expend all or any part of its CDBG allocation
only on those activities identified in Exhibit 1.
2. The Uniform Administrative Requirements, as promulgated in 24 CFR
570.502, shall apply to all activities undertaken by the Sub-
recipient provided for in this Agreement or by any program income
generated therefrom.
3. The Subrecipient shall be responsible for procurement of all
supplies, equipment, services, and construction necessary for
implementation of its activity/ies. Procurement shall be carried
out in accordance with the "Common Rule" provisions (24 CFR 85)
(which replace OMB Circular A -102 for the purposes of this Agree-
ment), the procurement requirements of the Subrecipient, and all
provisions of the Community Development Block Grant Regulations, 24
CFR 570 (the most restrictive of which will take precedence). The
Subrecipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, all advertise
ments, negotiations, notices, and documents; enter into all con-
tracts; and conduct all meetings, conferences, and interviews as
necessary to insure compliance with the above described procurement
requirements. The Recipient shall provide advise and staff assis-
tance to the Subrecipient to carry out its CDBG- funded activity /ies.
4. The Subrecipient shall be responsible for carrying out all acquisi-
tions of real property necessary for implementation of the activity/
ies. The Subrecipient shall conduct all such acquisitions in its
name and shall hold title to all properties purchased. The Subre-
cipient shall be responsible for preparation of all notices,
appraisals, and documentation required in conducting acquisition
under the latest applicable regulations of the Uniform Relocation
Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Act of 1970 and of the CDBG
Program. The Subrecipient shall also be responsible for providing
all relocation notices, counseling, and services required by said
regulations. The Recipient shall provide advice and staff assis-
tance to the Subrecipient to carry out its CDBG- funded activity /ies.
5. The Subrecipient shall comply with the acquisition and relocation
requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property
Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 as required under 24 CFR 570.606(a)
and HUD implementing regulations at 24 CFR 42; the requirements in
24 CFR 570.606(b) governing the residential antidisplacement and
relocation assistance plan under section 104(d) of the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1974 (the Act); the relocation require-
ments of 24 CFR 570.606(c) governing displacement subject to section
104(k) of the Act; and the requirements of 24 CFR 570.606(d)
governing optional relocation assistance under section 105(a)(11) of
the Act.
6. The Subrecipient shall maintain records of the expenditure of all
CDBG funds it receives, such records to be maintained in accordance
with OMB Circulars A -87 and the "Common Rule" provisions (24 CFR 85)
and in accordance with OMB Circular A -110 and A -122, as applicable.
All records shall be made available, upon request of the Recipient,
for inspection /s and audit /s by the Recipient or its representa-
tives. If a financial audit /s determines that the Subrecipient has
improperly expended CDBG funds, resulting in the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development disallowing such expenditures, the
Recipient reserves the right to recover from the Subrecipient such
disallowed expenditures from non -CDBG sources. Audit procedures are
specified below in Section 22 of this Agreement.
7. The Subrecipient shall take all necessary actions, not only to
comply with the stipulations as set out in Exhibit 1, but to comply
with any requests by the Recipient in that connection; it being
understood that the Recipient has responsibility to the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for insuring
compliance with such requirements. The Subrecipient also will
promptly notify the Recipient of any changes in the scope or
character of the activity /ies which it is implementing.
2
8. a. The Subrecipient does hereby agree to release, indemnify, and
hold harmless the Recipient from and against all costs,
expenses, claims, suits or judgments arising from or growing
out of any injuries, loss or damage sustained by any person or
corporation, including employees of Subrecipient and property
of Subrecipient, which are caused by or sustained in connection
with the tasks carried out by the Subrecipient under this
Agreement.
b. The Subrecipient does further agree that in order to protect
itself as well as the Recipient under the indemnity agreement
provisions hereinabove set forth it will at all times. during
the term of this Agreement and any renewal thereof, have and
keep in force: a single limit or combined limit or excess
umbrella commercial and general liability insurance policy of
an amount of not less than $600,000 for property damage arising
from one occurrence, $600,000 for damages arising from death
and /or total bodily injuries arising from one occurrence, and
$600,000 for total personal injuries arising from one occur-
rence. Such policy shall also include contractual liability
coverage protecting the Recipient, its officers, agents and
employees by a certificate acknowledging this Agreement between
the Subrecipient and the Recipient.
9. The Recipient agrees to provide the Subrecipient with Community
Development Block Grant funds in such amounts as agreed upon in this
Agreement to enable the Subrecipient to carry out its CDBG - eligible
activity/ies as described in Exhibit 1. It is understood that the
Recipient shall be held accountable to HUD for the lawful expendi-
ture of CDBG funds under this Agreement. The Recipient shall
therefore make no payment of CDBG funds to the Subrecipient and draw
no funds from HUD/U.S. Treasury on behalf of a Subrecipient activ-
ity/ies, prior to having received a proper Hennepin County Warrant
Request form from the Subrecipient for the expenses incurred, as
well as copies of all documents and records needed to insure that
the Subrecipient has complied with the appropriate regulations and
requirements.
10. The Recipient shall maintain the environmental review record on all
activities. The Subrecipient shall be responsible for providing
necessary information to the Recipient to accomplish this task.
11. The Recipient shall be responsible for the preparation of all
requests for HUD for wage rate determinations on CDBG activities
undertaken by the Subrecipient. The Subrecipient shall notify the
Recipient prior to' initiating any activity, including advertising
for contractual services which will include costs likely to be
subject to the provisions on Federal Labor Standards and Equal
Employment Opportunity and related implementing regulations. The
Recipient will provide technical assistance to the Subrecipient to
insure compliance with these requirements.
12. The Recipient agrees to provide technical assistance to the Subre-
cipient in the form of oral and /or written guidance and on -site
01
assistance regarding Community Development Block Grant procedures
and project management. This assistance will be provided as
requested by the Subrecipient, and at other times, at the initiative
of the Recipient, when new or updated information concerning the
CDBG Program is received by the Recipient and deemed necessary to be
provided to the Subrecipient.
13. The Recipient shall have authority to review any and all procedures
and all materials, notices, documents, etc., prepared by the
Subrecipient in implementation of this Agreement, and the Subrecip-
ient agrees to provide all information required by any person
authorized by the Recipient to request such information from the
Subrecipient for the purpose of reviewing the same.
14. In accordance with the provisions of 24 CFR 85.43, suspension or
termination of this Agreement may occur if the Subrecipient materi-
ally fails to comply with any term of this Agreement. This Agree-
ment may be terminated for convenience in accordance with 24 CFR
85.44. This Agreement may be terminated with or without cause by
either party hereto by giving thirty (30) days written notice of
such termination. CDBG funds allocated to the Subrecipient under
this Agreement may not be obligated or expended by the Subrecipient
following such date of termination. Any funds allocated to the
Subrecipient under this Agreement which remain unobligated or
unspent following such date of termination shall automatically
revert to the Recipient.
15. Any material alterations, variations, modifications or waivers of
provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been
reduced to writing as an Amendment to this,Agreement signed and
approved by the respective parties, governing bodies and properly
executed by the authorized representatives of the parties. All
Amendments to this Agreement shall be made a part of this Agreement
by inclusion in Exhibit 2 which shall be attached at the time of any
Amendment.
16. All data collected, created, received, maintained or disseminated
for any purposes by the activities of the Subrecipient in the
performance of this Agreement is governed by the Minnesota Govern-
ment Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, and all
other statutory provisions governing data privacy, -the Minnesota
Rules implementing such act now in force or hereafter adopted, as
well as Federal regulations on data privacy.
17. During the performance of this Agreement, the Subrecipient agrees to
the following: In accordance with the Hennepin County Affirmative
Action Policy and the County Commissioners, Policies Against
Discrimination, no person shall be excluded from full employment
rights or participation in, or the benefits of, any program, service
or activity on the grounds of race, color, creed, religion, age,
sex, disability, marital status, affectional /sexual preference,
public assistance status, ex- offender status, or national origin;
and no person who is protected by applicable federal or state laws
against discrimination shall be otherwise subjected to discrimination.
4
18. The effective date of this Agreement is July 1, 1990. The termina-
tion date of this Agreement is December 31, 1991, or at such time as
the activity /ies constituting part of this Agreement are satisfac-
torily completed prior thereto. Upon expiration, the Subrecipient
shall relinquish to the Recipient all program funds unexpended or
uncommitted for the activities described in Exhibit 1.
19. If the Subrecipient generated any program income as a result of the
expenditure of CDBG funds, the provisions of 24 CFR 570.504 shall
apply, as well as the following specific stipulations:
a. The Subrecipient recognizes that it must-notify the Recipient
of any program income within ten (10) days of the date.that
such program income is generated. When program income is
generated by an activity that is only partially assisted with
CDBG funds, the income shall be prorated to reflect the
percentage of CDBG funds used.
b. That any such program income must be paid to the Recipient by
the Subrecipient as soon as practicable after such program
income is generated or may be retained by the Subrecipient, as
specifically identified in Exhibit 1.
C. The Subrecipient further recognizes that the Recipient has the
responsibility for monitoring and reporting to HUD on the use
of any such program income. The responsibility for appropriate
recordkeeping by the Subrecipient and reporting to the Recip-
ient by the Subrecipient on the use of such program income is
hereby recognized by the Subrecipient. The Recipient agrees
to provide technical assistance to the Subrecipient in estab-
lishing an appropriate and proper recordkeeping and reporting
system, as required by HUD.
d. That in the event of close -out or change in status of the
Subrecipient,.any program income that is on hand or received
subsequent to the close -out or change in status shall be paid
to Recipient as soon as practicable after the income is
received. The Recipient agrees to notify the Subrecipient,
should close -out or change in status of the Subrecipient occur.
20. Any real property under the control of the Subrecipient that was
acquired or improved, in whole or in part, using CDBG funds in
excess of $25,000 shall either be:
a. Used to meet one of the national objectives in 24 CFR 570.208
until five years after expiration of this Agreement; or
b. Disposed of in a manner that results in the Recipient's being
reimbursed in the amount of the current fair market value of
the property less any portion of the value attributable to
expenditures of non -CDBG funds for acquisition of, or improve-
ment to, the property.
W
21. The following standards shall apply to real property under the
control of the Subrecipient that was acquired or improved, in whole
or in part, using CDBG funds:
a. The Subrecipient shall inform the Recipient at least thirty
(30) days prior to any modification or change in the use of the
real property from that planned at the time of acquisition or
improvements including disposition.
b. The Subrecipient shall reimburse the Recipient in an amount
equal to-the current fair market value (less any portion
thereof attributable to expenditures of non -CDBG funds) of
property acquired or improved with CDBG funds that is sold or
transferred for a use which does not qualify under the CDBG
regulations. Said reimbursement shall be provided to the
Recipient at the time of sale or transfer of the property
referenced herein.
C. Any program income generated from the disposition or transfer
of property prior. to or subsequent to the close -out, change of
status or termintion of the Joint Cooperation Agreement
between the Recipient and the Subrecipient shall be repaid to
the Recipient at the time of disposition or transfer of the
property.
22. The Subrecipient agrees to provide Recipient with an annual audit
consistent with the Single Audit Act of 1984, (U.S. Public Law
98 -502) and the implementing requirements of OMB Circular A -128,
Audits of State and Local Governments, and, as applicable, OMB
Circular A -110, Uniform Requirements for Grants to Universities,
Hospitals and Non - Profit Organizations.
a. The audit is to be provided to Recipient on July 1 of each year
this Agreement is in effect and any findings of noncompliance
affecting the use of CDBG funds shall be satisfied by Subrecip-
ient within six (6) months of•the provision date.
b. The audit is not required, however, in those instances where
less than $25,000 in assistance is received from all Federal
sources in any one fiscal year.
C. The audit may not be paid from CDBG funds.
d. The Recipient reserves the right to recover, from non -CDBG
sources, any CDBG expenses which are disallowed by the audit.
23. The Subrecipient shall comply with the applicable section of 24 CFR
570.200, particularly sections (b) (Special Policies Governing
Facilities); (c) (Special Assessments);.(f) (Means of Carrying Out
Eligible Activities); and (j) (Constitutional prohibitions Concern-
ing Church /State Activities).
3
24. The Subrecipient shall comply with the Lead -Based Paint notifica-
tion, inspection, testing and abatement procedures established in
24 CFR 570.608.
25. The Subrecipient shall be prohibited from receiving CDBG funds for
activity /ies subject to this Agreement should it not affirmatively
further fair housing within its own jurisdiction or impedes action
taken by Recipient to comply with the fair housing certification.
26. No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or
on behalf of the Subrecipient, to any person for influencing or
attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a
Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an
employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of
any Federal contract, the making of any Federal Grant, the making of
any Federal loan, the entering into of amendment, or modification of
any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
27. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or
will be paid to any person for influencing.or attempting to influ-
ence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an
officer -or employee of Congress, or an employee of _a Member of
Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or
cooperative agreement Standard Form -LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report
Lobbying," will "be completed and submitted in accordance with its
instructions.
28. The use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies against any
individuals engaged in nonviolent civil rights demonstrations within
the jurisdiction of the Subrecipient is prohibited.
7
SUBRECIPIENT, having signed this Agreement,'and the Hennepin County Board
of Commissioners having duly approved this Agreement on
19_, and pursuant to such approval and the proper County officials having
signed this Agreement, the parties hereto agree to be bound by the provisions
herein set forth.
Upon proper execution, this COUNTY OF HENNEPIN,
Agreement will be legally, STATE OF MINNESOTA
valid and binding.
y:
Chairman of
its County Board
Assistant County Attorne}� And:
y C�J �l Deputy /Associate County Administrator
Date: G. /
APPROVED AS TO EXECUTION:
Assistant County Attorney
Date:
H.
Attest:
Deputy /Clerk of the County Board
SUB CIPIENT:
By:
Its
And:
Its
Attest:
Title
OF Cl�inCti
The City is'organized pursuant to:
_ Plan A _ Plan B _ Charter
o ei ,:
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: KENNETH ROSLAND
From. CRAIG LARSEN
Date: SEPTEMBER 4, 1990
Subject. DR. JOYCE ANDERSON
AMENDMENT TO CUSTOMARY
HOME OCCUPATIONS.
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #. IV. D. 1.
Consent 7
Information Only C
Mgr. Recommends ( i To HRA
CI
To Council
Action n
Motion
Resolution
Ordinance
Discussion
Because of time constraints we were forced to publish notice of the
public hearing prior to the Planning Commission meeting. The
hearing date was published as September 17, 1990. However, the
Planning Commission continued the item on their agenda.
Consequently, on September 17, we will recommend continuing the
hearing to the October 15, 1990, Council Meeting. No public
hearing will be held on September 17, 1990, as originally
published.
The Planning Commission has considered two different requests by
Dr. Anderson to amend the Zoning Ordinance. The Commission has
recommended denial of both approaches. However, at its August 29,
1990, meeting the Commission asked Staff to prepare a Conditional
Use Permit process for their consideration. We intend to present
the Conditional Use Permit approach to the Commission at their
September 26, 1990, meeting. Their recommendation would then be
heard by the City Council on October 15, 1990.
Recently, the federal government enacted the Americans with
Disabilities Act. Tom Erickson's office is presently assessing the
impact of the legislation on any action the City may take. We
should know the answer prior to the September 26, 1990, Commission
Meeting.
7 �rIAA..
o
e,1
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis Hoffma r�q'"
City Engineer
Date: 4 September, 1990
Subject: Public Hearing
Vacation of Easements
for Public Purpose -
Interlachen Hills
3rd Addition
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # V•A•& B.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
0
To Council
Action ❑
Motion
0
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Vacate public easements that are depicted upon the attached sketch (yellow
shaded areas) and retain a 20' utility easement (portion shaded in pink).
Info/ Background:
The applicant is requesting vacation of easements as they are depicted on the
attached sketch. The first sketch is a site map and the second sketch shows
two easement areas which the City no longer has a need for any easements except
for the pink shaded area which is a sanitary sewer utility. The other utility
companies also accept the proposed vacation of easements. As such, staff
recommends vacating the easements with reserving a 20 foot easement on Outlot
A as shaded in pink.
The request is in concert with clearing title for the Lincolns Apartment project.
The City had earlier vacated some of the roadway but not all easements, and the
developer has requested these vacations of easements.
_ =I .�
SPRUCK
w
O
O =
N O
I
= L X I S H
..v ..7 MALON EY
u 3
m
2
GR•Np c =
7 r I` O
v,Ew
= N 1
PARK S
CEMETERY WQ
<
It
`\ O RMAN Ay w T R •
u
�.1LKENBLiFF G
a
z N w W (<+
'-.
j IMTI LACM « BLVD
I
I � o
ar
HAROLD WOODS
\ \ \ \ \\ APP(c LA
GREEN -,
2 FARMS
CURT o _�
WESTWOO
TE.LEMARK T ` O�
pE� WI W W000 COURT
h
s ` I>R t Is a
Kw0 0
I u
I .
I'�• W r �
to STAUDE
ok
JI�III \11111
°\ \ j�II��I1111111\ I \\
ark. a /c.l . �� " - l / /�
p P r° y �A/Or //ier /y ey A m. 1017 o! Ales/
17 '5t,' NvIf) _i _ _ / Zoe o! Lp/J 19 !S, b47CA /
m ; I �/ � i%/ / /' ' • I� I I I I I II ' �89�_ - o L � -- � ����ip
• �' / /i / / /// %No1119 W'I AS. QIf40RC1 :�.� III / i��i• "i �',j %[``\\� �O- _
/ I,1 .' �•. r. III II ''' /• 1• �!"
71
NW corner of Lo/ ?s ter/ 1� ,y11"'.'y„.:t - IIIIIII
I i, /,l I � -� - `•1111 I I II e i' I v �. -� �-
o l /ll%lj , •..�..yO'�r � - �\ I�111I III / r 1 / �/ � " e � � ��� � i ""
•m. I � f• 0 . / . \\ 1 \111 I 5 r "'�� i'�� ;� %� � "7 "r "
C) lill /� /� .�y;� $ \I\\ \ \\\I� \ •� / / / / o ; -ate,,_ ..
7 � % % / / / /// 8 i �'� � - -- \\ \��� ����� -�• err r / " -�� /iii /i: o�� ' /
41
CD
\
Nt
"��
q i 1111111 \�:-l' i N \\ °roN�`��_
1 11\ '. p� spe uti /i /y ea'semen/ per plat
ERLACYEN H/LLS 3Rn ADA•N
lle
� Aso {�• O j '��� �` /� t1i "�' ems' \ `� '.m'' \ \\ U ev$ ° y `� '•HpA' �•�/
,� loro _ z--. _ \� \� � -L -'gib o ai•�. � __ =-T --✓-� _____ 1- _- - �1> / -,,.,• /, / •�
_eB��_'� NO'II'9 'W 92.00 MEAi(RE[.
os °o i��- `� I NO•II'19 "W es.20 Rus. (e4.2e REC.I ./ . _1 -r/ / bO�/ /. 2 i
/ ti1t_
E U /// easee/t, e 894315 - 1
iii:. -
L ( N C 0'L Np [S 1'V'k =�
17Z I
l l l� /j j// 1111•.11/ ./ __ _ �_-d -- — \ I �� �\ n'�l � �;, it ?� l
l r � ,1 /l �� 1�1! °� /u /l� �"\ ti.• � � ---- - - --`— —�2 _° _ -_•�_r -- -�'� I � 1 4 „ /i,�.l I � •` � I
I I !\: i °� • ue -�s \ I19.es e\ \\ I T : 19�llll
1 111I1r W.9e / °
1 111 01 1 ,� \ Drainage f U /iTLy eas�/17en/ Per P /d /.O! /NTEALAC NEN HiL CJ 3 iL ADDN /PFOPOSEO wA[ATiON) p 1 I 1 m 11 Il l�l��lr aI I( I m 1 I I I I I j
o\ �� _Bbz- -- � �` ,' � o I I I n, I I�iilllll �• I i l? � 1 1 1 1
1. I 11 �Ilvl, hl� I $ ' v
R OPO\SED ",� BUI DING 2
�^ailo�jo1
i
F UNDATION DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN, THEIR DETAIL OMITTED,
YELLOW HIGHLIGHTED AREA = PROPOSED VACATION; PINK = EASEMENT TO BE RETAINED
I
CITY OF EDINA
PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY VACATION APPLICATION
Date Initiated 8/1/90
Fee Waived
1) I hereby petition the City Council of the City of Edina to vacate all of the following
described public right -of -way:
Street
Drainage Easement
a Alley
Other
Legal description of area proposed to be vacated:
Utility Easement
(describe)
Existing drainage and utility easements over the westerlV 10 feet of Lots 1 2 3
4, and 5, Block .l, Interlachen Hills 3rd Addition, being those dedicated in the
plat thereof of record in Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Attached copy of scaled drawing showing in full detail the proposed vacation.
See attached survey, item A. LINCOLN DRIVE ,gg sota mited partnership Signa n
Norman P. Bj nnes, J
Address 401 Groveland Avenue
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403
Telephone 612/874 -1102
2) Review
CITY ENGINEER by Acceptable
Conditions
MINNEGASCO by Acceptable
Conditions
N.W. BELL by = Acceptable
Conditions
N.S.P. by = Acceptable
Conditions
Opposed Conditional
Opposed = Conditional
= Opposed Conditional
= Opposed D Conditional
10 -3800
r
CITY OF EDINA
PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY VACATION APPLICATION
-Date Initiated $/1/.90
Fee Waived
1) I hereby petition the City Council of the City of Edina to vacate all of the following
described public right -of -way:
Street
DDrainage Easement
Alley
Utility Easement
Public park lands, public open space and
Other storm water pond and holding area
(describe)
Legal description of area proposed to be vacated:
That part of Outlot A, INTERLACHEN HILLS 3RD ADDITION according to the recorded plat
thereof, which lies east of the northerly extension of the west lines of Lots 29 through
3.5, Block 1, in said INTERLACHEN HILLS 3RD ADDITION.
Attached copy of scaled drawing showing in full detail the proposed vacation.
LINCOLN DRIVE P RTNERS, a n sota limi d partnership
See - attached survey, item B. Signature �J
Norman P. Bjornnes, Jr.
Address 401 Groveland Avenue
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403
Telephone 612/874 -110
2) Review
CITY ENGINEER by Acceptable
Conditions
MINNEGASCO by Acceptable
Conditions
N.W. BELL by Acceptable
Conditions
N.S.P.
Conditions
= Acceptable
Opposed Conditional
Opposed F71Conditional
Opposed Conditional
= Opposed D Conditional
10 -3800
r.�
t,
�v91N�.r`1r
o e,
o
v •' ~�URPOSN��O/
ItlBB
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis Hoffman
City Engineer
Date: 4 September, 1990
Subject: Public Hearing -
Vacation of Easement
across Galleria Property
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # v • c
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
❑
To Council
Action ❑
Motion
0
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Approve vacation of utility easement across Tract J, RLS 629 (Galleria Property).
Info/Background-
The applicant requests vacation of a utility easement across the Galleria property
(sketch attached). This easement contains a water main that once completed a
water main loop prior to the construction of the Yorktown area. The easement
and water main system are no longer needed as part of the public system.
Therefore, staff recommends vacating the easement and all other utility
companies also find this to be acceptable.
MbRTGAGE LOAN *'RVEY
for
ABBERT and GABBERT COMPANY
IACT N,R -L.S 432
SAN
WEST 69th DOC .TN?v5953089wATERMAINEASEMENT
STREET
,-• RFS i RIf,TIVE EASEMENT FOR THE SANITARY SE'NER B WATERMAIN EnSF r.,E r11 `I UTll.lio B DRAM
' CITI WELL AS PER DOC NQ 462686 SANITARY SEWER B WATERMAIN EASEMENT DOC. N4 5953061 UOC. N- 820329
DOC. NQ 595307 ro S 89 °48'54 W
SANITARY SEWER B WATERMAIN EASEMENT - - 1886).51 -, -� UTILITY I N4B820328- EASEMENT
—DOC. NQ 595306
n ^ — - n ' n n
- C. n77.__J O -._ ,•. _ _ w :•39.5 n 39.5", ry µ
� 1� —
to OF SAN. SEWER ATERMAIN
EASEMENT J) 9 595 26 B 95307 Z?) -- --'- -'�• -
- -- -y77 9 —_
0 not
-4 SD /Y ov,ld! q .Pclback L /ee
` \i. .g` :I ,�6 •� O IRA I; WATERMAIN EASEMENT -
zo r, ^ Gabbert _ _ + (14)
1 �! ^ryy M- M DOC. NQ 595309
and ry °' �1 `� ti 6 • -:sn /s p3)
Gabbert �- Southdole ,+ o:
C_ c r a 7t). Bowl ° s
- F2 L.S 13Gf.� •� RL$ 1 0 9 U4)
N .o
Center J 5498 Ap4rr..iriT Loaf fls.� o� r 3 '• ,•
1`L7l,RCT N/W �•�.� �7-T•t��
Q I ! lt�a1- ti r�� rIII.MfFrT1TTTi ;37.30` 37.M'• !°
e 1 / % L_ —_ *-r-r TRRCT : 8
.,
BELOW a I a4 a ,S t24)
Existing Shopping Center �. +s.o �_,-.. + m Ezistillg wr,,
55 -72, e° -w Shopping C -rater
W sn - AS 84y e . Theater Building Al L. 1306 „o r
/)+.o ti !•' +
-J b e o v -+ +r% .S 1iriT -- 11 L
In 2; 111 FFPi ?'r .,., - ' :3). 1I J y TµTll }(}�j�
Q �_ �ac� NEN .7
ul ' ��- _ W 't L i 4 K
702 •� V , E— FI1r; -- -- ,S 1110_:.::; z
IOl) 1 4)1 6 /0, �l[)fl
I
'1) L)1'1 I II 111111111111111
;}.
WEST
ICI IWAY El1SEMEN1 1`10 1111:1- III 1 IS I•I: hll)FN!i I,I 11.'. rJf). 70 .1974.
SMPORARV EASEMFrII, rifII I('1 Nt L If. IIf NI)FNS MA: NO. 1974, EXPIRES
EPT, 30, 1991.
I Atln mrrxplPilntl•
N89046'00 "E o
70th STREET
DARK SHADED AREA = PROPOSED VACATION
HEREBY CERTIFY TO:
GABBERT AND GABBERTT COMPANY, NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO
AND TITLE INSURANCF COMPANY OF MINNESOTA.
THAT THIS SURVEY CORRECTLY SHOWS THE LOCATION OF ALL BUILDINGS, STRUCTU
OTHER IMPROVEMENTS SITUATED ON THE SAID PREMISES, ALL APPLICABLE SETBAC
RIGHTS OF WAY, ENCROACHMENTS ON OR FROM THE PREMISES AND ALL EASEMENTS
." rTr,r yr tn•Prr -n n. Inv,,. n, r,,, rn r, „•r •Iry Tr'I rTn,,
CITY OF EDINA
PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY VACATION APPLICATION
Date Initiated August 7. 1990
A JO 2 1990
1) I hereby petition the City Council of the City of Edina to vacate all of the following
described public right -of -way:
Street
Drainage Easement
D Alley
L —J Utility Easement
rn rHi
Other
(describe)
1 r70 •711
.t V 16"V
Legal description of area proposed to be vacated:
Tfie West Sixteen (16) feet of the East Six Hundred Forty -eight (648) feet
of -the South Two Hundred Eighty -two and Ninty -one Hundredths (282.91) feet
and the East Eight (8) feet of the West One Thousand Two Hundred Forty -six
and Fifty -one Hundredths (1246.51) feet (except the North Twenty-'seven (27)
feet thereof and the South Two Hundred Eighty -two and Ninety -one Hundredths
(282.91 ) feet thereof) ail in Tract Registered an survey Number Six
Hundred Twenty -nine (629), Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Watermain Easement Doc. o. 595310 and legal descripption for Watermain Easement Doc.
Attached co No. 595309 attached. -
copy of scaled drawing showing in full detail he proposed 3K catZ
Signature U
Address Gabbert and Gabbert Company
3510 West 70th Street, Edina, MN 554
Telephone(612) 925-4321
2) Review
CITY ENGINEER by
Acceptable
=Opposed
Conditional
Conditions
MINNEGASCO.by
Acceptable
=Opposed
Conditional
Conditions
N.W. BELL by
Acceptable
=Opposed
_ Conditional
Conditions
N.S.P. by Acceptable Opposed Conditional
Conditions
10 -3800
C
OI
/1 1
/ W
O
To: Ken Rosland
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
From: Janet Chandler
Date: September 4, 1990
Subject: Recycling Ordinances
No. 715 -A1
No. 1301 -A5
Recommendation:
Approval of ordinance amendments.
Info /Background:
Agenda Item #
vz . A -1 & 2
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
®
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
0
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Ordinance No. 715 -A1 requires that, as of January 1, 1991:
- recycling programs shall be set up in all multi -unit housing
buildings, and
- residents of such buildings (except nursing home residents) shall
be required to separate recyclables from other refuse, and
- apartment and condominium managers or associations shall report
program information to the City.
Ordinance No. 1301 -A5 requires that, as of January 1, 1991, garbage haulers
-shall offer recycling service to their apartment and condominium
customers, and
-shall report to the City, on a quarterly basis, the tonnage of
recyclables collected from Edina apartments and condominiums.
These ordinance amendments will be in compliance with Hennepin County's
recently adopted policy which was submitted to Council in a separate report.
ORDINANCE NO. 715-A1
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 715
TO PROVIDE FOR MANDATORY SEPARATION
AND STORAGE OF RECYCLABLES FROM PLANNED
RESIDENCE DISTRICTS AND MIXED
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS IN THE CITY
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ED1NA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Definitions. The following definitions of Sec. 2 of Ordinance
No. 715 are hereby amended to read as follows:
"Dwellings" means those dwellings described at (i), a" (ii) and
�Q of the definition of Premises in this ordinance.
"Premises" means (i) all single family dwellings now or
hereafter located in the Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1) as
determined by the Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance No. 825) of the City,
(ii) all double dwellings now or hereafter located in the Double
Dwelling Unit District (R -2) as determined by said Zoning Ordinance,
(iii) all dwelling units (as defined by said Zoning Ordinance) in a
building in a Planned Residence District (PRD or PSR) or Mixed
Develovment District as determined by said Zoning Ordinance px=t
however, those in a building in the PRD-5 subdistrict as determined by
said Zoning Ordinance (iv) all buildings in a PRD 5 subdistrict as
determined by said Zoning Ordinance vj all buildings or parts of
buildings now or hereafter owned by or leased to the City and located
in the City, except, however, park shelter or park toilet buildings, and
4vXvil all buildings or parts of buildings now or hereafter owned by or
leased to the School District and located within the City.
Sec. 2. Sevaration and Storage of Recyclables.
(a) Sec. 3(a) of Ordinance No. 715 is hereby amended to read as follows:
(a) Every resident of every premises except the premises
described at (iv) of the definition of Premises in this ordinance shall
separate the recyclables from their respective premises from all other
refuse, garbage, rubbish and waste matter as defined in Ordinance No.
711, and shall store the recyclables separately in containers designated
as containers for the storage of recyclables: As to the premises described
at iv of the definition of Premises in this ordinance it shall be the
obligation and resyonsibility of the manager or owner of such
rr;
e
W
premises, and not of the individual occupants thereof, to separate
store reaclables as required by the immediately preceding sentence
(b) Sec. 3(b) of Ordinance No. 715 is hereby amended to read as follows:
(b) Containers for storage or recyclables shall be kept in the same
location as is designated by Ordinance No. 711 for refuse containers;
provided, however, that residents of those dwellings described at (i)
and (ii) of the definition of Premises in this ordinance and residents of
townhouses as defined in the Zoning Ordinance (No 825) of the City_
and residents of dwelling units in buildings with eight dwelling units
or less therein, not earlier than twelve (12) hours prior to the day for .
scheduled collection of recyclables from their, respective dwellings,
shall place the recyclables and the containers for recyclables at a place
adjacent to the dwelling (or building in which the dwelling is located)
or garage accessory thereto and visible from the street in front of the
dwelling (or building in which the dwelling is located) or from the
alley by the dwelling (or building in which the dwelling is located) if
that dwelling (or building in which the dwelling is located) has refuse
collection service at the alley. After the scheduled collection, the
containers for recyclables and any recyclables not collected shall be
returned by the resident of such 4he dwelling to the same location as
containers for refuse are kept as designated by Ordinance No. 711.
Sec. 3. Collection of Recyclables.
(a) Sec. 4(a) of Ordinance No. 715 is hereby amended to read as follows:
(a) Collection of recyclables from premises shall be by a hauler
selected and paid by a resident of such premises or by a manager of such
premises or by an association governing such premises but which
hauler is then duly licensed by the City under Ordinance No. 1301 of
the City and other then applicable ordinances of the City or County.
Also such collection shall be done in compliance with all other
applicable ordinances of the City now or hereafter in effect.
(b) Sec. 4 of Ordinance No. 715 is hereby amended to add a new
Paragraph (d) as follows:
(d) The manager or governing association of premises as
defined at (iii) and (iv) of Sec. 2 of this ordinance shall report to the City
Manager, uvon written request from time to time made by the City
Manager, or his /her designee and on forms prescribed by the City
Manager, or his /her designee such information relative to the
2
yrogram for separation. storage and collection of recvclables then in
effect for their vremises as the City Manager or his/her designee shall
then request.
Sec. 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
upon its passage and publication, but not earlier that January 1, 1991.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Published in the Edina Sun - Current on
ATTEST:
City Clerk
01
Mayor
ORDINANCE NO. 1301 -A5
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1301
TO REQUIRE GARBAGE HAULERS AND RECYCLING
HAULERS TO OFFER RECYCLABLE COLLECTION SERVICE
AND TO PROVIDE RECYCLING REPORTS, AND
IMPOSING A PENALTY
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Ordinance No. 1301 is hereby amended by adding a new
Sec. 16 as follows:
Sec. 16. Recyclable Collection Service. All persons licensed
under this ordinance to haul, convey or collect rubbish, garbage or
other refuse, as defined in Ordinance No. 711 of the City, or recyclables
as defined in Ordinance No. 715 of the City, shall offer recyclable
collection service to their customers.
Sec. 2. Ordinance No. 1301 is hereby amended by adding a new Sec. 17
as follows:
Sec. 17.. Re cling Reports. Within thirty (30) days after the end
of each calendar quarter, and also upon request made from time to
time by the City Manager, or his /her designee, each hauler licensed
under this ordinance, shall provide to the City such information as is
then requested by the City Manager, or his /her designee, on forms
prescribed by the City Manager, or his /her designee, relative to the
recyclables collected during the period from the then prior report to the
City, including the amounts and kinds of recyclables, the markets used
for sale of, and primary purchasers of, recyclables, and including such
other information relative to recyclables as may then be requested by
the City Manager, or his /her designee.
Sec. 3. Penaljy Sec. 16 of Ordinance No. 1301 is hereby renumbered
Sec. 18 and amended to read as follows:
"Section 18. Penalty.
a. Any person violating this ordinance shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor and subject to a fine and penalty as set out
in Ordinance No. 175 of the City, as from time to time
amended.
!J
b. In addition to the foregoing penalties, the license of any
person violating this ordinance may be suspended or
revoked as provided by Ordinance No. 141 of the City and
Sec. 8 of this ordinance."
Sec. 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
immediately upon its.passage and publication, but not earlier than January 1, 1991.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Published in the Edina Sun - Current on
ATTEST:
City Clerk
2
Mayor
glr7A..1
. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: i:ayor and Council Members
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director Park and Recreation Department
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: August 30, 1990 AGENDA ITEM VIII.A
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Cahill Interpretive Site
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1' Concrete Design Specialist $114,670
2. 2.
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Reject Bid
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Recommend reject and rebid. We received one bid for the Interpretive
site at 70th and Cahill. Will redesign and rebid total project.
y'4 " .
Snature Department
The Recommended bid is —
within budget not wit 'n b get J '' Wallin, Fri ance Director
Kenneth RoslAnd, City
° 0. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
, U .
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director Park and Recreation Department
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000
DATE: August 31, 1990
AGENDA ITEMVIII. B
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Playground Equipment - Pamela Park
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1• Earl F. Andersen and Assoc., Inc 1, $24,318.66 - Pamela
2. Odland Construction, Inc. 2. $ 24,560.00 - Pamela
3: 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Earl F. Andersen and Assoc., Inc. $ 24,318.66
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Purchase and installation of playground equipment for Pamela Park
The Recommended bid is
within budget not withA buck
Kenneth Rosland City
Wallin, Firifte Director
° 0 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director Park and Recreation Department
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE. August 31, 1990 AGENDA ITEM VI II . C
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Playground Equipment for York Park
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Earl F. Andersen and Assoc., Inc.
2.
3. Odland Construction, Inc.
4.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Earl F. Andersen and Assoc., Inc.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.$ 15,633.34..- York
2.$ 19,230.00 - York
3.
4.
5.
$ 15,633.34
Purchase and installation of playground equipment for York Park.
The Recommended bid is
Department
within budget not
Kenneth Rosland City
Director
° e_ . REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: 4 September, 1990
AGENDA ITEM V I I I. D.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Phase I - Lighting & Demolition Removals
Company 50th & France Amount of Quote or &d
1. Electric Service Company of Mpls., Inc. 1. $ 598,443.00
2. Kilmer Electric Company 2. $ 652,212.10
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR END:
Electric Service Company of Mpls., Inc. $ 598,443.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This is Phase I of the 50th & France Renovation project. This project would
replace the e::isting pedestrian lighting in the area and add lighting to
some areas that currently do not have pedestrian lighting. These lighting
plans are consistent with the reviewals conducted by the 50th & France
Steering Committee. This project would have new lighting up for the
Christmas shopping season. The balance of the renovation would occur in
the Phase II bid and be completed in the spring of 1991. The funding for
this project is HRA funds and special assessments.
Engineering
Sign ure Department
The Recommended bid "is — —
within budget
IV mil
° REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Playor and Council Members
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director Palk and Recreation Department
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00
DATE: August 30, 1990 AGENDA ITEM VIII.E
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Energy management system for Edinborough Park
Company Amount of Quote or 13id
1 CSEt-1, Inc. 1. $9,339.00
2. 2.
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR END: cm, Inc. $9,339.00
GENERAL INFORMATION: CSEM, Inc. is the only company in the area that represents Novar
Control Systems equipment and is modular in concept for HVAC equipment at Edinborough Park. Recommend
installing system in the pool equipment area for the pool pac HVAC unit. Recommend purchase the
monitoring equipment from CSEM, Inc. known as the Common Sense Approach to Building Management.
The monitoring system will benefit energy management and go beyond the two axiom's of control and
savings. Interfacing Park facility and units of park plaza, the demands of tenant comfort at both
locations can be accomplished with better preventative maintenance programs, and consistent efficient
operation through better equipment access and control.
Cost of the system will be recovered through energy savings in two to three years.
i
Silna7tfire Dep nt
The Recommended bid is
within budget not withjvl budget ohm l►alli Finaflce Director
Kenneth Rosland City Manager
r�
/1N_
FEQ' 3 75�
TL O
. 'y
\.
T0: _ Ken Rosl and
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
From: Janet Chandler
Date: September 4, 1990
Subject: Recyclinq Policy for
Multifamily Housing
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # TX _ A
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
To Council
Action ❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Resolution to- provide City funding to offset the cost of recycling
containers for multifamily buildings, based on a maximum amount of $5 per
household. The cost would be reimbursed by Hennepin County, with the
implementation details to be worked out later.
The intent is to provide funding for large recycling storage containers,
not one container per household.
Info /Background:
On August 7; the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners passed a resolution
establishing a policy for multifamily housing units with two major
provisions:
-The County resolved to amend Ordinance 13. to require that recycling
services be available to multifamily housing units by July 1, 1991.
-The County will subsidize the cost of containers up to a maximum of $5
per household. This will be the only funding provided by the County
for multifamily housing units.
The details for implementation of the funding provision have not been
worked out, except that cities would need to apply for this reimbursement
by December 31, 1991.
A copy of the County Board resolution 90- 8 -592R1 is attached, together with
copies of letters from apartment building managers.
RESOLUTION NO. 90- 8- 592111
010;'0
The f ol lowing 'resolution was offered by Commissioner Andrew, seconded by
Commissioner Spart7:
WHEREAS, the Recycling Task Force requested that the County
evaluate the cost of subsidizing collection services and containers for
multifamily housing units; and
WHEREAS, the Recycling Task Force also recommended that by 1991,
the County develop'an ordinance requiring that recycling opportunities
be provided for multifamily residents;
BE.IT RESOLVED, that Hennepin County amend Ordinance 13 to require
that recycling services be available to multifamily housing units by
July 1, 1991. Municipalities must adopt ordinances that require
property owners of multifamily housing to provide recycling services-by
July 1, 1991; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Hennepin County subsidize the cost of
containers up to a maximum of $S.00 per multifamily household. The
cities must apply for this reimbursement by December 31, 1991; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that five- to eight -unit buildings can be
added at the city's discretion in 1990 to the existing municipal
curbside service and would be eligible for funding under the current
reimbursement policy; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the 1991 funding policy be revised to
reflect that the container subsidy will be the only County funding
available for multifamily units above eight -plex.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board expresses its appreciation to
the City of Edina for its assistance.
Commissioner Johnson moved to amend the second resolving clause to add
the language to provide that these containers shall contain 20% post consumer
plastic material if available. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Andrew.
and adopted unanimously.
The question was on the adoption of the resolution as amended and there
were Seven YEAS and No NAYS as follows:
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS YEA NAY OTHER
Jeff Spartz X
Randy Johnson X
John Keefe X
John E. Derus X
Tad Jude X
Mark Andrew X
Sam S. Sivanich, Chairman X
RESOLUTION ADOPTED.
ATTEST:_26C
C I erk the Cou ty Board AUG 0 7 1990
Council Mettibers
We are managers of the large apartment buildings in Edina. We pay property
taxes amounting to $1,200 - $1,400 per apartment. In the last four years
due to market conditions, we have seen our incomes decrease and our expenses
increase so that we are operating in the red. 'these are not easy times for
our industry. Values have plummeted and foreclosures are common. We have
never worked so hard and managed so well and still lost so rnuch money.
Now we are being asked to take on another expense. The expense of recycling
programs in our communities.
Don't get us wrong, we support recycling. It is something in which we strongly
believe, but, we also believe that we should be treated the same as the
homeowner. Renters are not second class citizens in Edina. They shouldn't,
have to pay more taxes and receive fewer services and subsidies. Homeowners
receive a 100% subsidy for recycling through Edina and Hennepin county.
'there is no proposed subsidy to renters. .
It is erroneously believed that there will be no extra costs to apartment
communities for recycling. This is not the case. Costs in large communities
involve: set -up, promotion and education, extra labor to deal with the con-
tainers, containers themselves and hauling and disposal. If a program is to
be successful, these things must be done well and then maybe in the future
with gq2� participation there will be lower hauling costs to offset these
direct recycling expenses. There is a learning curve and it will take time,
effort and money to make the program buc:cessful.
We believe you should pass the recycling ordinance and we request that
you include a subsidy for rental communities.
Ccdar!% Edina
7.340 Gallagher Drive
Sandy 1_attu - 600 units
York Plaza
7320 York Avenue South
Kay Sand - 250 units
W a l l ingtord
5101 West 7Oth
Becky Logan - 84 units
Parklawn Estates
4141 Yarklawn Avenue
Mary & Don Little - 118 units
NOXMI M8
1yse - nan
ApocWu
7401 Mmf Blvd
tube 135
B&^ MN N4X
(eta} �irr10'10,,.
i.
The CiiT'gouncii
City . of Edina
Members of the councils
As managing agent for Edina Towers Apartments, I have an interest
in the specifies of the proposed mandatory recycling ordinance
which is before you. I echo the comments of my cohorts in Edina.
We enthusiastically support any recycling program and have recycled
on a voluntary basis for several months. We find our residents
extremely cooperative and anxious to participate.
in the letter you received from Cedars Edina, -York Plata and The
Wallingford, the ills of the multifamily housing industry were
noted. Rising gas prices would appear to loom in our future as
well. At Edina Towers our trash carrier has informed us that a
$2.00 per unit charge will be, charged in conjunction with the
passage of the mandatory recycling ordinance. upon investigation
we found that other haulers also intend to charge for the
additional costs involved in recycling. This creates an enormous
disincentive to participation, because our cost will increase
nearly $400 per month. .
We would ask that the city consider its renters to be lull -- fledged
citizens and treat them in the same manner as its homeowners.
whatever subsidy is determined to be appropriate should be applied
to all residential units in the city of Edina in a non-
discriminatory fashion.
Thank you for your Consideration of this matter.
ainc rely,
athleen M. McKenna - Harmon, CPM
President, McKenna Management Associates, Inc.
Managing Agent, Edina Towers Apartments
KMtta 1 f f
o e � tt
ud
\N�RIOM'vO/
itltltl
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: HRA AND COUNCIL
From: GORDON L. HUGHES
Date: SEPTEMBER 4, 1990
Subject:
REBATE OF EXCESS TAX
INCREMENTS - EDINA
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # IX. B.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
❑
To Council
Action ❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Consider rebate to the Edina School District of excess tax increments
from 50th & France and Grandview tax increment financing districts
resulting from the 1988 school district referendum.
Info /Background:
On August 6, 1990, the City Council considered the request of the
Edina School'District to rebate excess tax increments from the
50th & France and Grandview tax increment financing districts which
resulted from the 1988 school district referendum. The City Council
asked that the school district provide additional information concerning
the revenue neutrality of the requested rebate. Attached is a letter
from Jim Hamann, Assistant Superintendent of Schools, which provides
such additional information. The Council also asked the amount that
would be rebated to the Richfield School District, if they were to
make a similar request for the southeast Edina financing district
(it should be noted that the Richfield district has not made such a
request). Also attached is a memo from Eric Anderson, Assistant Finance
Director, that provides an estimate of the rebate for the southeast
Edina district if it were requested.
WE CARE
WE DARE
WE SHARE
4 I
August 31, 1990
Mr. Gordon Hughes, Assistant City Manager
PUBLIC City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
SCHOOLS Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Gordon,
I have spoken with persons at the Education Finance and Analysis section of the
Minnesota Department of Education to request a written statement of their interpretation
of the "revenue neutral" concept of M.S. 469.177, Subdivision 10. They have declined
to put their interpretation in writing but have orally stated that a rebate of excess tax
increments from a city to a school district is not "revenue neutral" and in fact any amount of
rebate is new revenue. They did state that there were no plans to build an adjustment
into the levy limit authority calculation that is annually proposed by the Finance and
Analysis Section. I have examined the Levy Limitation and Certification printout from the
department carefully and in fact there is no inclusion of a calculation to adjust for rebate of
excess tax increments. A copy of the printout is attached. The General Fund adjustment
calculations begin on page three and are totalled on page four and there is no adjustment
for rebate of excess tax increments built into the program.
A copy of the statute (M.S. 469.177, Subdivisions 9 and 10) is attached. Subdivision 10
which is specific to rebate of excess increment associated with referendum is silent on the
matter of the "revenue neutral' concept. My guess as to why the research staff of the
House of Representatives a year ago was interpreting the statute to be "revenue neutral'
is because there is such language in Subdivision 9 (see clause 2,b). Subdivision 9, of
course, pertains to excess taxes and is not applicable to the referendum matter.
I hope that this letter and the attached documents will suffice to settle the "revenue
neutral" question.
Sincerely,
t
James A. Hamann
Assistant Superintendent for Business Services
JAWjd
5701 Enclosures
NORMANOALE
ROAD
E D I N A
MINNESOTA
55424
612-920-2980 tOU. L0F�O= -^1PL0YF'
'4
I-
DISTRICT NO. 273 TYPE 1 L E
S T A T
V Y L
E D E
I
P A R T M E N T O F
E D U C A T I
O N
ED- 001 1 1- 12
M I T
A T I O N A N D C E
R T I F I C A
T I O
N
1
DISTRICT NAME EDINA
1 9
9 0 P A Y A B L E 1
9 9 1
ECSU REGION 11 HENNEPIN
PAGE 01
OF 16
DATE OF
RUN: 08/13/90
LEVY LIMITATION AND CERTIFICATION
REPORT OUTLINE
GENERAL INPUT DATA
I. GENERAL INPUT DATA
PAGE
TAX CAPACITY DATA
PUPIL DATA (CONT)
A. TAX CAPACITY DATA
1
ASSESSED VALUE (AV):
FUND BALANCE PUPIL UNITS (FBPU):
B. PUPIL DATA
1
(1)
(2)
1985 AV
549,361,088
(27)
1988 -89 FBPU (ACT)
6,102.39
1986 AV
561,234,699
(28)
1990 -91 FBPU (EST)
6,482.35
(3)
1987 AV
585,679,547
II. INITIAL LEVY COMPUTATIONS
AFDC PUPIL UNITS:
BY FUND
ADJUSTED ASSESSED VALUE
(AAV):
(29)
ACT OCT 87 AFDC COUNT
29
(4)
1985 AAV
606,039'.300
(30)
1988 -89 AFDC PERCENT
A. GENERAL
2.
(5)
1986 AAV
624,982,961
((29)/(22)) X 100
(6)
1987 AAV
685,005,318
(31)
ACT 88 -89 AFDC FACTOR
.5%
B. TRANSPORTATION
4
(32)
ACT 88 -89 AFDC PU
ADJUSTED GROSS TAX CAPACITY (AGTC):
(29) X (31)
C. COMMUNITY SERVICE
4
(7)
1987 AGTC
81,635,618
D. CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
5
(8)
1988 AGTC
87,983,494
(33)
ACT OCT 88 AFDC COUNT
29
(34)
1989 -90 AFDC PERCENT
NET TAX CAPACITY (NTC):
((33)/(23)) X 100
E. GENERAL DEBT
5
(9)
1987 NTC
55,332,862
(35)
EST 89 -90 AFDC FACTOR
.5%
(10)
1988 NTC
60.086,862
(36)
EST 89 -90 AFDC PU
F. TECH COLLEGE DEBT
5
(11)
1989 NTC
63,744,885
(33) X (35)
G. TECH COLLEGE OTHER
5
SALES RATIO:
(37)
ACT OCT 89 AFDC COUNT
33
III. LIMITATION ADJUSTMENTS
(12)
(13)
1988 SALES RATIO
1989 SALES RATIO
85.6%
(38) 1990 -91 AFDC PERCENT
BY FUND
92.3%
((37)/(24)) X 100
5%
(39)
EST 90 -91 AFDC FACTOR
UNLIMITED ADJUSTED NTC (
UANTC):
(40)
EST 90 -91 AFDC PU
A. GENERAL
6
(14)
1988 UANTC
(37) X (39)
(10)/(12)
70,194,932
B. TRANSPORTATION
8
(15)
1989 UANTC
(41)
EST OCT 90 AFDC COUNT
33
C. COMMUNITY SERVICE
8
(11)/(13)
69,062,714
(42)
1991 -92 AFDC PERCENT
((41)/(25)) X 100
.5%
ADJUSTED NTC (ANTC):
(43)
EST 91 -92 AFDC FACTOR
D. CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
8
(16)
1988 ANTC
70,194,932
(44)
EST 91-92 AFDC PU
(17)
1989 ANTC
69,062,714
(41) X (43)
E. GENERAL DEBT
g
F. TECH COLLEGE DEBT
8
PUPIL DATA
TOTAL PUPIL UNITS (WADM
+ AFDC):
(45)
1988- 89_TOTAL PU
G. TECH COLLEGE OTHER
8
RESIDENT AVE DAILY MEMBERSHIP
(ADM):
(46)
(22) +(32)
1989 -90 TOTAL PU
6,048.77
(18)
1988 -89 ADM (ACT)
5,352.63
(23) +(36)
6,245.50
IV. ABATEMENT ADJUSTMENTS
9
(19)
1989 -90 ADM (EST)
5,580.00
(47)
1990 -91 TOTAL PU
V., TACONITE ADJUSTMENTS
9
WEIGHTED ADM PUPIL UNITS
(WADM):
(48)
(24) +(40)
1991 -92 TOTAL PU
6,392.65
VI. TOTAL LEVY LIMITATION
(20)
1986 -87 WADM (ACT)
6,753.49
(25) +(44)
6,624.15
10
(21)
1987 -88 WADM (ACT)
6,518.36
(22)
1988 -89 WADM (ACT)
6,048.77
VII. LEVY CERTIFICATION
(23)
1989 -90 WADM (EST)
6,245.50
FORMS
11
(24)
1990-91 WADM (EST)
6,392.65
(25)
1991 -92 WADM (EST)
6,624.15
87 -88 WADM RECOMPUTED USING
1.35
SECONDARY WEIGHTING FACTOR:
(26)
1987 -88 ACTUAL
DISTRICT NO. 273 TYPE 1
DISTRICT NAME EDINA
ECSU REGION 11 HENNEPIN
GENERAL EDUCATION REVENUE
BASIC REVENUE:
(25) 1991 -92 WADM 6,624.15
(101) BASIC REVENUE
(25) X $2,953 19,561,114.95
COMPENSATORY EDUCATION REVENUE
(44) EST 1991 -92 AFDC PU
(102) COMPENSATORY REVENUE
(44) X $2,953
TRAINING & EXPERIENCE REVENUE
(103) EST 'TRN & EXP INDEX 1.7395
(104) TRN & EXP ALLOWANCE
.(103) -1.6 X $700 97.65
(25) 1991 -92 WADM 6,624.15
(105) TRN & EXP REVENUE
(104) X (25) 646,848.25
SPARSITY REVENUE
(106) ATTENDANCE AREA 12.87
(107) DIST TO NEAREST H.S.
(108) ISOLATION INDEX
(SO RT .(106)/2 I +(107) 2.50
(109) ISOLATION INDEX RATIO
LSR OF 1 OR
.(108) -23 /10
(110) 1991 -92 SECONDARY ADM 2,559.00
(111) SECONDARY ADM RATIO
.400 -(110) /.400 +(110)
(112) SEC SPARSITY REVENUE
$2,953 X (109)
X (110) X (111)
(113) ELEM SPARSITY REVENUE
(MEMO)
(114) TOTAL SPARSITY REVENUE
(112) +(113)
- GENERAL EDUCATION REVENUE
(101) BASIC REVENUE 19,561,114.95
(102) COMPENSATORY REVENUE
(105) TRN & EXP REVENUE 646,848.25
(114) SPARSITY REVENUE
(115) GENERAL EDUC REVENUE
(101) +(102)
+(105) +(114) 20,207,963.20
S T A T E D E P A R T M E N T O F E D U C A T I O N
L E V Y L I M I T A T I O N A N D C E R T I F I C A T I O N
1 9 9 0 P A Y A B L E 1 9 9 1
V.
ED- 00111 -12
PAGE 02 OF 16
DATE OF RUN: 08/13/90
SUMMARY OF GENERAL & SUPPL REVENUE
(115) GENERAL EDUC REVENUE 20,207,963.20
(130) SUPPLEMENTAL REVENUE 418,513.80
(137) FUND BALANCE REDUCT
(138) TOTAL REVENUE
(115) +(130) -(137) 20,626,477.00
INITIAL GENERAL EDUCATION LIMIT
STANDARD LEVY LIMIT
(115) GENERAL EDUC REVENUE 20,207,963.20
(17) 1989 ANTC 69,062,714
(139) STANDARD.LEVY LIMIT
(17) X .264 18,232,556.50
OFF FORMULA AMOUNT
FOR DISTRICTS WITH (115) < (139):
(140) OFF FORMULA AMOUNT
(139) -(115)
1991 -92 STATE AIDS
(141) GENERAL EDUC AID
(142) SHARED TIME AID
(143) TRANSPORTATION AID
(144) SPECIAL EDUC AID
(145) SEC VOC AID
(146) OTHER CATEG AIDS
(147) HACA AID 0
(148) DISPARITY AID
(149) OTHER TAX AIDS
(150) TOTAL 1991 -92 AID
(141) THRU (149)
(151) LEVY EQUITY ADJUST
(140) X 4/6 BUT
NOT GTR THAN (150)
(152) EST COUNTY APPORT
(153) OFF FORMULA LIMIT
(115) +(151) +(152) -
INITIAL GENERAL EDUCATION LIMIT
PRIOR TO ADJUSTMENTS
(139) STANDARD LEVY LIMIT 18,232,556.50
(153) OFF FORMULA LIMIT
(154) INITIAL GEN ED LIMIT
LSR OF (139) OR (153) 18,232,556.50
SUPPLEMENTAL REVENUE
1987 -88 REVENUES
(116)
FOUNDATION REVENUE
(PRIOR TO FUND BAL
SUBT)
15,865,848.12
(117)
DISTRICT TRA & FICA
2,118,575.56
(118)
COOP TRA & FICA
61,098.10
(119)
CHEM DEP AID
6,363.71
(120)
GIFTED & TALENTED
10,901.7C
(121)
ARTS.EDUC AID
5,810.03
(122)
87 SUMMER PROG REV
24,690.90
(123)
LIABILITY INS LEVY
107,238.62
(124)
PROG OF EXCELL GRANTS
(125)
TOTAL REVENUES
(116) THRU (124)
18,200,526.74
(26)
1987-88 WADM
(1.35 SEC WEIGHTING)
6,373.12
(126)
1987 -88 REVENUE /WADM
(125)/(26)
2,855.83
(127)
MINIMUM ALLOWANCE
(126) + $258
3,113.83
(115)
GENERAL EDUC REV
20,207,963.20
(25)
1991 -92 WADM
6,624.15
(128)
1991 -92 REVENUE /WADM
(115)/(25)
3,050.65
(129)
SUPPLEMENTAL ALLOWANCE
GTR OF ZERO OR
.(127) -(128)
63.18
(130)
SUPPLEMENTAL REVENUE
(25) X (129)
418,513.80
FUND BALANCE ADJUSTMENT TO REVENUE
(131)
EST UNDESIGNATED OPR
FUND BAL 6/30/91
2,466,140.00
(132)
FY 91 COOP & COMB REV
(133)
NET FUND BALANCE
(131) -(132)
2,466,140.00
(28)
1990 -91 FUND BAL PU
6,482.35
(134)
$600 X (28)
3,889,410.00
(135)
EXCESS FUND BALANCE
(GTR OF ZERO OR
.(133) -(134)
(25)
1991 -92 WADM
6,624.15
(136)
MAXIMUM REDUCTION
(25) X $150
993,622.50
(137)
REDUCTION TO REVENUE
LSR OF (135) OR (136)
ED- 00111 -12
PAGE 02 OF 16
DATE OF RUN: 08/13/90
SUMMARY OF GENERAL & SUPPL REVENUE
(115) GENERAL EDUC REVENUE 20,207,963.20
(130) SUPPLEMENTAL REVENUE 418,513.80
(137) FUND BALANCE REDUCT
(138) TOTAL REVENUE
(115) +(130) -(137) 20,626,477.00
INITIAL GENERAL EDUCATION LIMIT
STANDARD LEVY LIMIT
(115) GENERAL EDUC REVENUE 20,207,963.20
(17) 1989 ANTC 69,062,714
(139) STANDARD.LEVY LIMIT
(17) X .264 18,232,556.50
OFF FORMULA AMOUNT
FOR DISTRICTS WITH (115) < (139):
(140) OFF FORMULA AMOUNT
(139) -(115)
1991 -92 STATE AIDS
(141) GENERAL EDUC AID
(142) SHARED TIME AID
(143) TRANSPORTATION AID
(144) SPECIAL EDUC AID
(145) SEC VOC AID
(146) OTHER CATEG AIDS
(147) HACA AID 0
(148) DISPARITY AID
(149) OTHER TAX AIDS
(150) TOTAL 1991 -92 AID
(141) THRU (149)
(151) LEVY EQUITY ADJUST
(140) X 4/6 BUT
NOT GTR THAN (150)
(152) EST COUNTY APPORT
(153) OFF FORMULA LIMIT
(115) +(151) +(152) -
INITIAL GENERAL EDUCATION LIMIT
PRIOR TO ADJUSTMENTS
(139) STANDARD LEVY LIMIT 18,232,556.50
(153) OFF FORMULA LIMIT
(154) INITIAL GEN ED LIMIT
LSR OF (139) OR (153) 18,232,556.50
S T A T
E D E
P A R T M E N T O F
E D U C A T
I O N
ED-00111-12
DISTRICT
NO. 273 TYPE 1
L E V Y L
I M I T
A T I 0 N' A N D C E
R T I F I C
A T I O
N
DISTRICT
NAME EDINA
1 99
0 P A Y A B L E 1
9 9 1
ECSU REGION
11 HENNEPIN
PAGE 03
OF 16
DATE OF
RUN: 08/13/90
FUND BALANCE LEVY ADJUSTMENT
SPECIAL EDUCATION
REFERENDUM (CONT)
(115)
GENERAL EDUC REVENUE
20,207,963.20
(165)
SPECIAL EDUCATION
434,086.94
(11)
1989 NET TAX CAPACITY
63,744,885
(139)
STANDARD LEVY LIMIT
18,232,556.50
(166)
1990 SP ED SUMMER
3,853.19
(190)
REFERENDUM TAX RATE
.14289291
(155)
GEN
(167)
VOC HANDICAPPED
22,332.06
(191)
(11) X (190)
9,108,692.12
EDUC LEVY RATIO
(168)
LIM ENGLISH PROF
29,785.00
((139)/(115)) NOT > 1
.90224613
(169)
SPECIAL EDUC LIMIT
(192)
REFERENDUM LIMIT
(156)
FUND
(165) +(166)+
IF (188) =0 AND (189) =0:
BAL LEVY ADJUST
(167) +(168)
490,057.19
(191)
(137) X (155)
IF (188) =0 AND (189) >O:
(157)
FUND BAL AID ADJUST
OPERATING DEBT
LSR OF (189) OR (191)
(137) -(156)
(170)
LY REMAINING OPER
IF (188) >O:
ZERO
9,108,692.12
DEBT LEVY AUTHORITY
SUPPLEMENTAL LEVY LIMITATION
(171)
LY OPER DEBT LIMIT
COOPERATION AND COMBINATION
(172)
TY REMAINING OPER
(130)
SUPPLEMENTAL REVENUE
418,513.80
DEBT LEVY AUTHORITY
(193)
DIST WADM SERVED
(155)
GEN EDUC LEVY RATIO
.90224613
(170) -(171)
(194)
COOP WADM SERVED
(158)
SUPPL
(17)
1989 ANTC
69,062,714
(195)
IF (194) > 2,000,
LEVY LIMIT
(173)
(17) X
(193)/(194) X 2,000;
(130) X (155)
377,602.46
(174)
OPERATING DEBT LIMIT
OTHERWISE (193)
(159)
SUPPLEMENTAL AID
LSR OF (172) OR (173)
(196)
COOP & COMBO REVENUE
(130)-(158)
40,911.34
STATUTORY OPERATING DEBT
(195) X $100
(197)
PROGRAM YEAR
GENERAL EDUCATION LEVY
LIMITATION
(175)
REVISED CERT SOD
(17)
1989 ANTC
69,062,714
(154)
INITIAL GEN ED LIMIT
18,232,556.50
(176)
(177)
LY NET SOD TO RETIRE
LY SOD LIMIT
(25)
(198)
1991 -92 WADM
(17)/(25)
6,624.15
(156)
FUND BAL LEVY ADJUST
(178)
LY TRANSFER TO SOD
(199)
COOP LEVY RATIO
10,425.90
(160)
ATTACHED MACHINERY
(179)
TY NET SOD TO RETIRE
(198)/$
1.00000000
(161)
GEN EDUC LEVY LIMIT
(17)
(176)- (177) -(178)
1989 ANTC
(200)
COOP & COMBO LIMIT
69,062,714
(196) X (199)
ALLOC TO ED DIST
(180)
(17) X .0166
(201)
EST COOP & COMBO AID
(MEMO)
(181)
SOD LEVY ADJUST
(196) -(200)
(182)
TY SOD LEVY LIMIT
(162)
GEN EDUC LEVY LIMIT
LSR OF (179) OR
INTERMEDIATE DISTRICT
IF (161) >O:
.(180) +(181)
ZERO
IF (161) < =0:
(202)
88 PAY 89 SEC VOC LVY
INTERDISTRICT COOPERATION
(203)
88 PAY 89 SPEC ED LVY
(154) - (156) -(160)
18,232,556.50
(204)
88 PAY 89 INTER LEVY
(25)
1991 -92 WADM
6,624.15
GENERAL AND SUPPLEMENTAL
AID
(183)
(25) X $50
(25)
1991 -92 WADM
6,624.15
(184)
EST COOP COST
(205)
(25) X $60
(115)
GENERAL EDUC REVENUE
20,207,963.20
(185)
LEAST OF (183) OR
(17)
1989 ANTC
69,062,714
(154)
INITIAL GEN ED LIMIT
18,232,556.50
(184) OR $50,000
(206)
(17) X 0.0143
(163)
INITIAL GEN EDUC AID
(186)
SEC VOC COOP LEVY
(207)
INTERMED DIST LIMIT
(115) -(154)
1,975,406.70
(187)
INTERDIST COOP LIMIT
GTR OF (204) OR
(159)
SUPPLEMENTAL AID
40,911.34
(185) -(186)
LSR OF (205)
(157)
FUND BAL AID ADJUST
REFERENDUM
OR (206)
(164)
GENERAL & SUPPL AID
(163) +(159) -(157)
2,016,318.04
(188)
REF LIMIT ALLOC TO
DESEGREGATION
ED DISTRICT (MEMO)
(17)
1989 ANTC
69,062,714
(189)
REFER DOLLAR LIMIT
(208)
DESEGREGATION LIMIT
(17) X
S T A T E
DISTRICT NO. 273 TYPE 1 L E V Y L I M
DISTRICT NAME EDINA
ECSU REGION 11 HENNEPIN
OTHER INITIAL GENERAL LEVIES
(209) UNEMPL INSURANCE
(210) UNEMPL INS - -ED DIST
(211) EDUCATION DISTRICT
(212) VOCATIONAL COOP
(213) JUDGMENT
(214) CONSOLIDATION
(215) HEALTH INS (MPLS)
(216) RETIREMENT (MPLS)
(217) SEVERANCE
(218) STATE AUDIT PETITION
(219) SUBTOTAL - -OTHER INITIAL
GENERAL LEVIES
D E P A R T M E N T O F E D U C A i I 0 N
I T A T I 0 N A N D C E R T I F I C A T I O N
1 9 9 0 P A Y A B L E 1 9 9 1
CONTRACT TRANSPORTATION:
(314)
FY 91 CONTRACT TRANS
17,508.00
ALLOWANCE PER FTE
42.00
(315)
FY 91 EST REGULAR FTE
2,464.00
(316)
FY 91 EST DESEG FTE
(322)
(317)
CONTRACT TRANS LIMIT
(320) - (321)
(314) X ((315) +(316))
103,488.00
(318)
EST FY 92 CONTRACT TRANS
FY92 EST REGULAR COST
669,849.00
ALLOWANCE PER FTE
3.00
(302)
FY 92 EST REGULAR FTE
2,562.00
(303)
FY 92 EST DESEG FTE
FY92 EST REGULAR FTE
(319)
FY 92 EST CONTRACT TRANS
FY92 EST EXCESS FTE
2,916.00
AID ADJ & EST 91 PAY 92
FY92 EXCESS WEIGHT FTR
1.00000000
CONTRACT TRANS LIMIT
FY92 WGT EXCESS FTE
17,508.00
(318) X ((302) +(303))
7,686.00
(220) TOTAL INITIAL GENERAL
LEVY LIMITATION
(158) +(161) +(162) +(169)+
(174) +(182) +(187) +(188)+
(192) +(200) +(207) +(208)+
(219) 28,226,416.27
TRANSPORTATION
FY 92 REGULAR TRANS REVENUE:
(301) EST REG TRANS ALLOW 192.00
(302) EST REGULAR FTE 2,562.00
(303) EST DESEGREGATION FTE
(304) EST REG TRANS REVENUE
(301) X ((302) +(303)) 491,904.00
BASIC TRANSPORTATION LIMIT:
(305) BASIC TRANS LIMIT
(89 ANTC X .0207) 1,429,598.18
NONREGULAR TRANSPORTATION:
(306) FY 92 EST NONREG COST
(307) REGULAR REVENUE FOR
DESEGREGATION TRANS
(301) X (303)
(308) NONREG TRANS REVENUE
(306) - (307)
(25) 91 -92 EST WADM PU
(309) $30 X 91 -92 WADM PU
(310) 60 PERCENT OF REVENUE
EXCEEDING $30 X WADM
(.60 X ((308) - (309)))
(311) EQUALIZED LEVY REVENUE
(308) - (310)
(198) 89 ANTC PER 91 -92 WADM
(312) LEVY RATIO
LSR 1 OR ((198)/$7,258)
(313) NONREG TRANS LIMIT
(311) X (312)
100,755.00
100,755.00
6,624. 15
198,724.50
100,755.00
10,425.90
ESTIMATED FY 92 TRANSP AID:
(320)
EST TRANS FORMULA REVENUE
(304) + (308)
592,659.00
(321)
EST LEVY SUBTRACTION
(305) +(313) +(319)
1,538,039.18
(322)
EST FY 92 TRANS AID
(320) - (321)
EXCESS TRANSPORTATION:
(323)
FY92 EST REGULAR COST
669,849.00
(324)
FY92 EST EXCESS COST
755,361.00
(325)
FY92 EST BUS DEPR
160,379.43
(302)
FY92 EST REGULAR FTE
2,562.00
(326)
FY92 EST EXCESS FTE
2,916.00
(327)
FY92 EXCESS WEIGHT FTR
1.00000000
(328)
FY92 WGT EXCESS FTE
(326) X (327)
2,916.00
(329)
FY92 EST BASE COST
((323) +(324) +(325))/
((302) +(328))
289.45
(301)
EST REG TRANS ALLOW
192.00
(330)
EST EXCESS TRANS ALLOW
(LSR: (301) OR (329))
192.00
(331)
EST HAZ COST WALKERS
(332)
EXCESS TRANS LIMIT
((328) X (330))+(331)
559,872.00
OTHER TRANSPORTATION:
(333) BUS PURCHASE LIMIT 65,866.00
(334) LEASED SCHOOL IN
OTHER DISTRICT
(335) POST- SECONDARY TRANS
(336) TOTAL INITIAL TRANS LIMIT
(305) +(313) +(317) +(332)+
ED- 00111 -12
PAGE 04 OF 16
DATE OF RUN: 08/13/90
COMMUNITY SERVICE
BASIC COMMUNITY EDUCATION:
(401) POPULATION (YEAR 1980)
(402) GREATER OF (401) OR 1,335
(403) YOUTH DEVELOPMENT PLAN 7
(404) YOUTH SERVICE PROGRAM ?
(405) FY 92 GENERAL REVENUE
($5.95 X (402))
(406) FY 92 YOUTH DEVELOPMENT
REVENUE $.50 X (402)
(407) FY 92 YOUTH SERVICE
REVENUE $.25_X (402)
(408) FY 92 COMMUNITY EDUC
REVENUE ((405) +
(406) + (407))
(409) 89 ANTC X .0107
(410) COMM EDUC LEVY LIMIT
(LSR: (408) OR (409))
(411) EST NY COMM EDUC AID
(408) - (410)
GRANDFATHER:
(412) GRANDFATHER LEVY LIMIT
(EQUAL TO 83 PAY 84
GRNDFTHR LEVY LIMIT)
EARLY CHILD FAMILY:
(413) EST POPULATION UNDER
FIVE YEARS OF AGE
(414) GTR OF (413) OR 150
(415) FY 92 EARLY CHILD
FAMILY REVENUE
($87.75 X (414))
(416) 89 ANTC X .0054
(417) EARLY CHILD LEVY LIMIT
LSR: (415) OR (416)
(418) EST NY EARLY CHILD AID
(415) - (417)
HANDICAPPED ADULTS:
(419) LEVY LIMIT
(LSR: $30,000 OR
50% OF APPROVED
EXPENDITURE)
ADULT BASIC EDUC:
(420) LEVY LIMIT
(89 ANTC X .0021)
(333) +(334) +(335) 2,259,579.18 (421)
NOTE: FY 92 ESTIMATED REGULAR AND CONTRACT
1.00000000 TRANSPORTATION ALLOWANCES ARE BASED ON MDE
ESTIMATES OF FY 90 DATA AND ESTIMATED
100,755.00 INFLATION FACTORS FOR FY 92. ACTUAL
ALLOWANCES MAY DIFFER SIGNIFICANTLY FROM
ESTIMATES.
TOTAL INITIAL
COMMUNITY SERVICE
LEVY LIMITATION
(410) +(412) +(417)+
(419) +(420)
39,664
39,664
YES
YES.
236,000.80
19,832.00
9,916.00
265,748.80
738,971.04
265,748.80
1,819
1,819
159,617.25
372,938.66
159,617.25
3,300.00
145,031.70
573,697.75
DISTRICT NO. 273 TYPE 1
DISTRICT NAME EDINA
ECSU REGION 11 HENNEPIN
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
FY 92 FACILITIES:
(25) 91 -92 WADM PU
(501) INITIAL REVENUE
($130 X (25))
(502) EST FACILITIES FUND
BALANCE 6/30/91
(503) $270 X (25)
(504) EXCESS FUND BALANCE
(GTR OF ZERO OR
((502) - (503))
(505) MAXIMUM FACILITIES
REVENUE (GTR OF ZERO
OR ((501) - ((504))
(506) AMOUNT ALLOCATED TO
DEBT REDEMPT FUND
(507) CEX FACILITIES REVENUE
((505) - (506))
(198) 89 ANTC / 91 -92 WADM
(508) CEX LEVY RATIO
(LESSER OF 1 OR
((198) / $11,186)
(509) CEX FACILITIES LEVY
LIMIT (507) X (508)
(510) CEX FACILITIES AID
(507) - (509)
FY 92 EQUIPMENT:
(25) 91 -92 WADM PU
(511) MAX EQUIPMENT REVENUE
($65 X (25))
(508) CEX LEVY RATIO
(512) INITIAL EQUIP LEVY
LIMIT (511) X (508)
(513) CEX EQUIPMENT AID
(511) - (512)
(514) DEBT SERVICE
EQUIPMENT LIMIT
(515) CEX EQUIP LEVY LIMIT
(512) (514)
S T A T E D E P A R T M E N T O F E D U C A T I O N
L E V Y L I M I T A T I O N A N D C E R T I F I C A T I O N
1 9 9 0 P A Y A B L E 1 9 9 1
6,624.15
861,139.50
115,889.00
1,788,520.50
FY 92 HEALTH AND SAFETY (H &S):
CUMULATIVE COST:
CUMULATIVE REVENUE:
(516)
FY 85 -89 HAZ COST
519,029.89
(517)
FY 90 EST H &S COST
364,568.00
(518)
FY 91 EST H &S COST
515,000.00
(519)
FY 92 EST H &S COST
251,190.00
(520)
CUMULATIVE COST
(524)
FY 85 -91 0TH REVENUE
((516) THRU (519))
1,649,787.89
802,624.20 FY 92 HEALTH AND SAFETY LIMIT:
CUMULATIVE REVENUE:
89 ANTC / 91 -92 WADM
58,515.30
(521)
FY 85 -89 HAZ REVENUE
500,484.00
(522)
FY 90 EST H &S REV
383,113.89
(098) / $5,304)
(523)
FY 9J EST H &S REV
515,000.00
861,139.50
(524)
FY 85 -91 0TH REVENUE
430,569.75
(530)
(525)
FY 92 OTHER REVENUE
(527) - (529)
(526)
CUMULATIVE REVENUE
PRORATION FACTOR
401,312.10
(532)
((521) THRU (525))
1,398,597.89
861,139.50
(530) X (531)
29,257.65
(533)
10,425.90
FY 92
HEALTH & SAFETY REVENUE:
(527) - (532)
(527)
FY 92 MAX H &S REVENUE
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE:
401,312.10
(GREATER OF ZERO OR
.93204899
ENERGY LOAN LIMIT
((526) - (520))
251,190.00
802,624.20 FY 92 HEALTH AND SAFETY LIMIT:
(538) TOTAL INITIAL CEX LEVY
LIMITATION
((509) +(515) +(533)+
(534) +'(535) +(536)+
(537))
10,425.90
� Me
ED- 00111 -12
PAGE 05 OF 16
DATE OF RUN: 08/13/90
GENERAL DEBT SERVICE
DEBT SERVICE FACILITIES:
(506) AMOUNT ALLOCATED TO
DEBT REDEMPTION FUND
(508) CEX LEVY RATIO .93204899
(701) DEBT SERVICE FACILITIES
LIMIT (506) X (508)
(702) DEBT SERVICE FACILITIES
AID ((506) - (701)
ADJUSTED BASIC DEBT SERVICE LIMIT:
(703) REQUIRED DEBT SERVICE
LEVY LIMITATION
(704) MAXIMUM EFFORT DS LEVY
(89 ANTC X )
(705) DS LOAN RECEIVABLE
(701) DS FACILITIES LIMIT
(706) ADJUSTED BASIC DS
LIMIT (GTR OF (703) OR
(704), LESS SUM OF
(705) AND (701.))
OTHER GENERAL DEBT SERVICE:
(707) DEBT SERVICE EQUIPMENT
LIMIT
(708) TOTAL INITIAL GENERAL
DEBT SERVICE LIMIT
((701) +(706) +(707))
251,190.00
MINIMUM GENERAL DEBT SERVICE LEVY:
(709) APPROVED OVER REQUIRED TO
1.00000000 REPAY CAPITAL LOAN
(710) MINIMUM GENERAL DEBT
SERVICE LEVY
251,190.00
TECHNICAL COLLEGE LEVIES
TECHNICAL COLLEGE DEBT SERVICE:
(801) INITIAL LEVY LIMIT
(802) MINIMUM TC DEBT LEVY
(EQUAL TO STATE AID)
TECHNICAL COLLEGE OTHER:
36,419.39 (803) TC UNEMPLOYMENT INS
(804) TC CONSTRUCTION
(805) TOTAL INITIAL TECHNICAL
COLLEGE OTHER LIMIT
((803) +(804))
1,491,545.69
(901) TOTAL INITIAL LEVY LIMITATION
((220) +'(336) +(420+
(538) +(708) +(801)+
(198)
89 ANTC / 91 -92 WADM
58,515.30
(528)
H &S LEVY RATIO
(LESSER OF 1 OR
(098) / $5,304)
6,624.15
(529)
INITIAL H &S LIMIT
(527) X (528)
430,569.75
(530)
INITIAL H &S AID
.93204899
(527) - (529)
(531)
PRORATION FACTOR
401,312.10
(532)
PRORATED H &S AID
(530) X (531)
29,257.65
(533)
CEX H &S LEVY LIMIT
(527) - (532)
OTHER
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE:
401,312.10
(534)
ENERGY LOAN LIMIT
-
(535)
COOP BUILDING
REPAIR LIMIT
(536)
FACILITIES DOWN
PAYMENT LIMIT
(537)
BUILDING LEASE-LIMIT
(538) TOTAL INITIAL CEX LEVY
LIMITATION
((509) +(515) +(533)+
(534) +'(535) +(536)+
(537))
10,425.90
� Me
ED- 00111 -12
PAGE 05 OF 16
DATE OF RUN: 08/13/90
GENERAL DEBT SERVICE
DEBT SERVICE FACILITIES:
(506) AMOUNT ALLOCATED TO
DEBT REDEMPTION FUND
(508) CEX LEVY RATIO .93204899
(701) DEBT SERVICE FACILITIES
LIMIT (506) X (508)
(702) DEBT SERVICE FACILITIES
AID ((506) - (701)
ADJUSTED BASIC DEBT SERVICE LIMIT:
(703) REQUIRED DEBT SERVICE
LEVY LIMITATION
(704) MAXIMUM EFFORT DS LEVY
(89 ANTC X )
(705) DS LOAN RECEIVABLE
(701) DS FACILITIES LIMIT
(706) ADJUSTED BASIC DS
LIMIT (GTR OF (703) OR
(704), LESS SUM OF
(705) AND (701.))
OTHER GENERAL DEBT SERVICE:
(707) DEBT SERVICE EQUIPMENT
LIMIT
(708) TOTAL INITIAL GENERAL
DEBT SERVICE LIMIT
((701) +(706) +(707))
251,190.00
MINIMUM GENERAL DEBT SERVICE LEVY:
(709) APPROVED OVER REQUIRED TO
1.00000000 REPAY CAPITAL LOAN
(710) MINIMUM GENERAL DEBT
SERVICE LEVY
251,190.00
TECHNICAL COLLEGE LEVIES
TECHNICAL COLLEGE DEBT SERVICE:
(801) INITIAL LEVY LIMIT
(802) MINIMUM TC DEBT LEVY
(EQUAL TO STATE AID)
TECHNICAL COLLEGE OTHER:
36,419.39 (803) TC UNEMPLOYMENT INS
(804) TC CONSTRUCTION
(805) TOTAL INITIAL TECHNICAL
COLLEGE OTHER LIMIT
((803) +(804))
1,491,545.69
(901) TOTAL INITIAL LEVY LIMITATION
((220) +'(336) +(420+
(538) +(708) +(801)+
S T A T E D E P A R T M E N T O F E D U C A T I O N ED-00111-12
DISTRICT NO. 273 TYPE 1 L E V Y L I M I T A T I O N 5 N D - C E R T I F I C A T I 0 N
DISTRICT NAME EDINA 1 9 9 0 P A Y A B L E 1 9 9 1 PAGE 06 OF 16
ECSU REGION 11 HENNEPIN DATE OF RUN: 08/13/90
ADJUSTMENT TO LEVY FOR 1990-91
GENERAL EDUCATION REVENUE FUND BALANCE ADJ TO REVENUE (CONT): SUPPLEMENTAL LEVY ADJUSTMENT:
(1019)
BASIC REVENUE:
3,661,434.00
(24)
1990-91 WADM
6,392.65
(1001)
BASIC REVENUE
(24) X $2,953
18,877,495.45
(1015)
COMPENSATORY EDUCATION
REVENUE:
(40)
EST 1990 -91 AFDC PU
3,050.65
(1002)
COMPENSATORY REVENUE
16,543,385.95
(40) X $2,953
REVENUE:
(32)
TRAINING & EXPERIENCE
REVENUE:
(1003)
ACT TRN & EXP INDEX
1.7395
(1004)
TRN & EXP ALLOWANCE
403,887.63
(16)
.(1003) -1.6 X $700
97.65
(1005)
TRN & EXP REVENUE
1.7801
(1044)
(24) X (1004)
624,242.27
(27)
SPARSITY REVENUE:
6,102.39
(1006)
ISOLATION INDEX
2.50
(1007)
ISOLATION INDEX RATIO
762,568.43
LSR OF 1 OR
(1046)
.(1006) -23 /10
2.50
(1008)
1990 -91 SECONDARY ADM
2,489.00
(1009)
SECONDARY ADM RATIO
.400- (1008) /
(1048)
.400+(1008)
2,536.59
(1010)
SEC SPARSITY REVENUE
$2,953 X (1007)
X (1008) X (1009)
(1011)
ELEM SPARSITY REVENUE
(MEMO)
(1012)
TOTAL SPARSITY REVENUE
(1051)
(1010) +(1011)
(1013)
GENERAL EDUCATION REVENUE
(1001) +(1002)+
17,305,954.38
(1005) +(1012)
19,501,737.72
(1019)
SUPPLEMENTAL REVENUE:
3,661,434.00
(126)
1987 -88 REVENUE /WADM
2,855.83
(1014)
MINIMUM ALLOWANCE
(126) + $258
3,113.83
(1015)
1990 -91 REVENUE /WADM
6,048.77
(1041)
(1013)/(24)
3,050.65
(1016)
SUPPL ALLOWANCE
16,543,385.95
GTR OF ZERO OR
REVENUE:
(32)
.(1014) - (1015)
63.18
(1017)
SUPPLEMENTAL REVENUE
AUTHORITY
(24) X (1016)
403,887.63
(16)
FUND BALANCE ADJUSTMENT
TO REVENUE:
(1018)
ACT UNDESIGNATED OPR
1.7801
(1044)
FUND BAL 6/30/89
1,244,410.43
(27)
1988 -89 FUND BAL PU
6,102.39
(1019)
$600 X (27)
3,661,434.00
(1020)
EXCESS FUND BALANCE
(GTR OF ZERO OR
.(1018)- (1019)
(1021)
MAXIMUM REDUCTION
6,048.77
(1041)
(24) X $150
958,897.50
(1022)
REDUCTION TO REVENUE
16,543,385.95
LSR OF (1020)
REVENUE:
(32)
OR ( 1021 )
(1042)
GENERAL EDUCATION LEVY
AUTHORITY
STANDARD LEVY LIMIT:
(16)
1988 ANTC
70,194,932
(1023)
STANDARD LEVY LIMIT
1.7801
(1044)
(16) X .263
18,461,267.11
FOR DISTRICTS WITH (1013) < (1023):
(1024) OFF FORMULA AMOUNT
(1023) - (1013)
(1025) 1990 -91 STATE AIDS
(MEMO)
(1026) LEVY EQUITY ADJUST
(1024) X 3/6 BUT
NOT GTR THAN (1025)
(1027) EST COUNTY APPORT 128,180.17
(1028) OFF FORMULA LIMIT
(1013)+(1026)- (1027)
(1029) LEVY AUTH FOR 90 -91 GEN ED
REVENUE BEFORE SUBTRACTIONS
LSR OF (1023)
AND (1028) 18,461,267.11
(1030) GEN EDUC LEVY RATIO
(1023)/(1013) NOT > 1 .94664729
(1031) FUND BAL LEVY ADJUST
(t022) X M30)
(1032) ATTACHED MACHINERY
(1033) LEVY AUTH FOR 90 -91 GEN ED
REVENUE AFTER SUBTRACTIONS
(1029)- (1031)-
(1032) 18,461,267.11
GENERAL EDUCATION LEVY ADJUSTMENT
(1034) 89 PAY 90 LIMIT FOR
1990 -91 GEN ED REV 18,461,267.11
(1035) CERTIFIED LEVY
BASED ON (1034) 18,461,267.11
(1036) FY 91 GENERAL EDUCATION
LEVY ADJUSTMENT
(1037) SUPPL LEVY AUTHORITY
(1017) X (1030) 382,339.13
(1038) 89 PAY 90 LIMIT FOR
1990 -91 SUPPL REV 382,339.13
(1039) CERTIFIED LEVY
BASED ON (1038) 382,339.13
(1040) FY 91 SUPPLEMENTAL
LEVY ADJUSTMENT
SUPPLEMENTAL REVENUE:
(125) 1987 -88 GEN ED REV
W/O INTER DIST COOP 18,200,526.74
(1052) 1987 -88 INTER DIST
COOP REVENUE
ADJUSTMENT TO LEVY FOR
1988 -89
GENERAL EDUCATION REVENUE
(BASED ON 1987 LAWS)
BASIC REVENUE:
(22)
1988 -89 WADM
6,048.77
(1041)
BASIC REVENUE
(22) X $2,735
16,543,385.95
COMPENSATORY EDUCATION
REVENUE:
(32)
ACT 1988 -89 AFDC PU
(1042)
COMPENSATORY REVENUE
(32) X $2,735
TRAINING & EXPERIENCE
REVENUE:
(1043)
ACT TRN & EXP INDEX
1.7801
(1044)
TRN & EXP ALLOWANCE.
.(1043) -1.6 X $700
126.07
(1045)
TRN & EXP REVENUE
(22) X (1044)
762,568.43
SPARSITY REVENUE:
(1046)
ISOLATION INDEX
2.50
(1047)
ISOLATION INDEX RATIO
LSR OF 1 OR
.(1046) -23 /10
(1048)
1988 -89 SECONDARY ADM
2,536.59
(1049)
SECONDARY ADM RATIO
.400- (1048) /
.400 +(1048)
(1050)
SPARSITY REVENUE
$2,735 X (1047)
X (1048) X (1049)
(1051)
GENERAL EDUCATION REVENUE
(1041) +(1042)+
(1045)+(1050)
17,305,954.38
SUPPLEMENTAL REVENUE:
(125) 1987 -88 GEN ED REV
W/O INTER DIST COOP 18,200,526.74
(1052) 1987 -88 INTER DIST
COOP REVENUE
S T A T E D E P A R T M E N T O F E D U C A T I O_ N ED -001 1 1- 12
DISTRICT NO. 273 TYPE 1 L E V Y L I M I T A T I O N A N D C E R T I F I C A T I O N
DISTRICT NAME EDINA 1 9 9 0• P A Y A B L E 1 9 9 1 PAGE 07 OF 16
ECSU REGION 11 HENNEPIN DATE OF RUN: 08/13/90
SUPPLEMENTAL REVENUE (CONT) GENERAL EDUCATION LEVY AUTH (CONT) SUPPLEMENTAL LEVY ADJUSTMENT
(1053) REVISED 87 -88 REVENUE
GENERAL EDUCATION LEVY AUTHORITY
STANDARD LEVY LIMIT:
(5) 1986 AAV 624,982,961
(1064) STANDARD LEVY LIMIT
(5) X .0359 22,436,888.29
FOR DISTRICTS WITH (1051) < (1064):
(1065) OFF FORMULA AMOUNT
(1064)- (1051) 5,130,933.91
(1066) 88 -89 STATE AIDS
(MEMO) 4,110,481.39
(1071) GEN EDUC LEVY RATIO
(1064)/(1051) NOT > 1
(1072) FUND BAL LEVY ADJUST
(1063) X (1071)
(1073) SUPPL LEVY AUTHORITY
(1058) X (1071)
MILL RATE ADJUSTMENT
(1074) TOTAL LEVY FOR
1987 -88 GEN ED REV
(4) 1985 AAV
(1075) 1987 -88 RATE
(1074)/(4) X 1000
(1076•) TOTAL LEVY FOR
1988 -89 GEN ED REV
(1070) - (1072) +(1073)
(5) 1986 AAV
(1077) 1988 -89 RATE
(1076)/(5) X 1000
(1078) EXCESS MILL INCREASE
GTR OF ZERO OR
.(1077) - (1075) -2.00
(1079) MILL RATE ADJUSTMENT
.(5)X(1078)/1000 /2
(1080) ATTACHED MACHINERY
(1088) 87 PAY 88 LIMIT FOR
1.00000000
(125) +(1052)
18,200,526.74
(26)
1987 -88 WADM
(1089)
CERTIFIED LEVY
(1.35 SEC WEIGHTING)
6,373.12
(1054)
REVISED 1987 -88
6,753.49
(1060)
REVENUE /WADM
4,052,094.00
(1061)
(1053)/(26)
2,855.83
(1055)
MINIMUM ALLOWANCE
FY 89 LEVY ADJUSTMENT:
(1054) +$40
2,895.83
(1056)
88 -89 REV PER WADM
88 PAY 89 ADJUST TO
87 PAY 88 LEVY
(1051)/(22)
2,861.07
(1057)
SUPPL ALLOWANCE
(0098) - (1099))
GTR OF ZERO OR
216,362.80
24.883
.(1055) - (1056)
CERTIFIED LEVY
(1058)
SUPPLEMENTAL REVENUE
BASED ON (1091)
(22) X (1057)
210,255.25
GENERAL EDUCATION LEVY AUTHORITY
STANDARD LEVY LIMIT:
(5) 1986 AAV 624,982,961
(1064) STANDARD LEVY LIMIT
(5) X .0359 22,436,888.29
FOR DISTRICTS WITH (1051) < (1064):
(1065) OFF FORMULA AMOUNT
(1064)- (1051) 5,130,933.91
(1066) 88 -89 STATE AIDS
(MEMO) 4,110,481.39
(1071) GEN EDUC LEVY RATIO
(1064)/(1051) NOT > 1
(1072) FUND BAL LEVY ADJUST
(1063) X (1071)
(1073) SUPPL LEVY AUTHORITY
(1058) X (1071)
MILL RATE ADJUSTMENT
(1074) TOTAL LEVY FOR
1987 -88 GEN ED REV
(4) 1985 AAV
(1075) 1987 -88 RATE
(1074)/(4) X 1000
(1076•) TOTAL LEVY FOR
1988 -89 GEN ED REV
(1070) - (1072) +(1073)
(5) 1986 AAV
(1077) 1988 -89 RATE
(1076)/(5) X 1000
(1078) EXCESS MILL INCREASE
GTR OF ZERO OR
.(1077) - (1075) -2.00
(1079) MILL RATE ADJUSTMENT
.(5)X(1078)/1000 /2
(1080) ATTACHED MACHINERY
(1088) 87 PAY 88 LIMIT FOR
1.00000000
FUND BALANCE ADJUSTMENT
TO.REVENUE:
(1059)
UNDESIGNATED OPR
(1089)
CERTIFIED LEVY
FUND BAL 6/30/87
3,510.292.16
(20)
1986 -87 WADM
6,753.49
(1060)
$600 X (20)
4,052,094.00
(1061)
EXCESS FUND BALANCE
88 -89 SUPPL REVENUE
GTR OF ZERO OR
FY 89 LEVY ADJUSTMENT:
.(1059)-(1060)
191,616.89
(1062)
MAXIMUM REDUCTION
88 PAY 89 ADJUST TO
87 PAY 88 LEVY
(22) X $150
907,315.50
(1063)
REDUCTION TO REVENUE
(0098) - (1099))
LSR OF (1061)'
216,362.80
24.883
OR ( 1062 )
CERTIFIED LEVY
GENERAL EDUCATION LEVY AUTHORITY
STANDARD LEVY LIMIT:
(5) 1986 AAV 624,982,961
(1064) STANDARD LEVY LIMIT
(5) X .0359 22,436,888.29
FOR DISTRICTS WITH (1051) < (1064):
(1065) OFF FORMULA AMOUNT
(1064)- (1051) 5,130,933.91
(1066) 88 -89 STATE AIDS
(MEMO) 4,110,481.39
(1071) GEN EDUC LEVY RATIO
(1064)/(1051) NOT > 1
(1072) FUND BAL LEVY ADJUST
(1063) X (1071)
(1073) SUPPL LEVY AUTHORITY
(1058) X (1071)
MILL RATE ADJUSTMENT
(1074) TOTAL LEVY FOR
1987 -88 GEN ED REV
(4) 1985 AAV
(1075) 1987 -88 RATE
(1074)/(4) X 1000
(1076•) TOTAL LEVY FOR
1988 -89 GEN ED REV
(1070) - (1072) +(1073)
(5) 1986 AAV
(1077) 1988 -89 RATE
(1076)/(5) X 1000
(1078) EXCESS MILL INCREASE
GTR OF ZERO OR
.(1077) - (1075) -2.00
(1079) MILL RATE ADJUSTMENT
.(5)X(1078)/1000 /2
(1080) ATTACHED MACHINERY
(1088) 87 PAY 88 LIMIT FOR
1.00000000
FINAL FY 89 LEVY AUTHORITY:
88 -89 SUPPL REVENUE
18,638.36
336,027.38
(1089)
CERTIFIED LEVY
6,098.19
(1096)
VOC HANDICAPPED
BASED ON (1088)
18,638.36
210,255.25
(1090)
TOTAL ADJUSTMENT FOR
TOTAL LEVY AUTHORITY
88 -89 SUPPL REVENUE
362,961.80
FY 89 LEVY ADJUSTMENT:
,(1073)- (1088)
191,616.89
15,079,777.25
(1091)
88 PAY 89 ADJUST TO
87 PAY 88 LEVY
606,039,300
(1101)
87 PAY 88 LEVY'FOR
(0098) - (1099))
88 -89 SUPPL REVENUE
216,362.80
24.883
(1092)
CERTIFIED LEVY
BASED ON (1091)
216,362.80
18,680,433.33
(1093)
FY 89 SUPPLEMENTAL
624,982,961
LEVY ADJUSTMENT
(1090) - (1092)
24,745.91-
29.890
FY 89 SPECIAL EDUCATION
ADJUSTMENT
3.007
939,661.88
(1081) LEVY AUTH FOR 88 -89 GEN ED
REVENUE AFTER SUBTRACTIONS
(1070)-(1072)-
(1079)- (1080) 17,530,516.20
GENERAL EDUCATION LEVY ADJUSTMENT
(1082) 87 PAY 88 LIMIT FOR
88 -89 GEN ED REV
(1083) CERTIFIED LEVY
BASED ON (1082)
(1084) TOTAL ADJUSTMENT FOR
88 -89 GEN ED REV
(1081) - (1083)
(1085) 88 PAY 89 ADJUST TO
(1067) LEVY EQUITY ADJUST 87 PAY 88 LEVY FOR
(1065) X 1/4 BUT 88 -89 GEN ED REV
NOT GTR THAN (1066) 1,282,733.48 (1086) CERTIFIED LEVY
(1068) ACT COUNTY APPORT 118,509.78- BASED ON (1085)
(1069) OFF FORMULA LIMIT
(1051) +(1067) - (1068) 18,470,178.08 (1087) FY 89 GENERAL EDUC
LEVY ADJUSTMENT
(1070) LEVY AUTH FOR 88- 89'GEN ED (1084) - (1086)
REVENUE BEFORE SUBTRACTIONS
LSR OF (1064)
18,037,943.95
OTHER GENERAL LIMITATION ADJUSTMENTS
18,037,943.95 (1102) FY 89 EXCEPTIONAL NEED
ADJUST (MEMO,)
(1103) MAINT PU VAR (MEMO) 13,631.35
(1104) DEBT SURPLUS TRANSFER
507,427.75- (1105) OTHER ADJUST (MEMO)
(1106) TOTAL GENERAL FUND
LIMITATION ADJUSTMENT
334,863.83- (1036) +(1040)+(1087)+
(1093) +(1101) +(1102)+
334,863.83- (1103) +(1104) +(1105) 74,038.10-
172,563.92-
FINAL FY 89 LEVY AUTHORITY:
(1094)
SPECIAL EDUCATION
336,027.38
(1095)
1988 SP ED SUMMER
6,098.19
(1096)
VOC HANDICAPPED
15,662.09
(1097)
LIM ENGLISH PROF
5,174.14
(1098)
TOTAL LEVY AUTHORITY
(1094) THRU (1097)
362,961.80
FY 89 LEVY ADJUSTMENT:
(1099)
87 PAY 88 LIMIT
253,321.42
(1100)
87 PAY 88 LEVY
253,321.42
(1101)
FY 89 SPEC ED ADJUST
(0098) - (1099))
109,640.38
18,037,943.95
OTHER GENERAL LIMITATION ADJUSTMENTS
18,037,943.95 (1102) FY 89 EXCEPTIONAL NEED
ADJUST (MEMO,)
(1103) MAINT PU VAR (MEMO) 13,631.35
(1104) DEBT SURPLUS TRANSFER
507,427.75- (1105) OTHER ADJUST (MEMO)
(1106) TOTAL GENERAL FUND
LIMITATION ADJUSTMENT
334,863.83- (1036) +(1040)+(1087)+
(1093) +(1101) +(1102)+
334,863.83- (1103) +(1104) +(1105) 74,038.10-
172,563.92-
S T A T E D E P A R T M E N T O F E D U C A T I O N
DISTRICT NO. 273 TYPE 1 L E V Y L I M I T A T I O N A N D C E R T I F I C A T I O N
DISTRICT NAME EDINA 1 9 9 0 P A Y A E L E 1 9 9 1
ECSU REGION 11 HENNEPIN
TRANSPORTATION ADJUSTMENTS
OFF - FORMULA ADJUST:
(1301) TRANS OFF - FORMULA
ADJUST (MEMO)
FY 90 CONTRACT ADJUST:
(1302) FY 90 CONTRACT LEVY
AUTHORITY (FROM
FY 89 TRANSPORTATION
AID REPORT, LINE 27)
(1303) 88 PAY 89 CONT LIMIT
(1304) 88 PAY 89 CONT LEVY
(1305) FY 90 CONTRACT ADJUST
FY 89 NONREGULAR ADJUST:
(1306) FY 89 NONREGULAR LEVY
AUTHORITY (FROM
FY 89 TRANSPORTATION
AID REPORT, LINE 20)
(1307) 87 PAY 88 NR LIMIT
(1308) 87 PAY 88 NR LEVY
(1309) FY 89 NONREG ADJUST
((1306) - (1307)))
FY 89 EXCESS TRANSP ADJUST:
(1310) FY 89 EXCESS LEVY
AUTHORITY (FROM
FY 89 TRANSPORTATION
AID REPORT, LINE 40)
(1311) 87 PAY 88 EXS LIMIT
(1312) 87 PAY 88 EXS LEVY
(1313) FY 89 EXCESS ADJUST
((1310) - (1312))
(1314) OTHER ADJUST (MEMO)
(1315) TOTAL TRANS ADJUST
(1301) +(1305) +(1309)+
(1313) +(1314)
COMMUNITY SERVICE ADJUSTMENTS
1,819
1,819
159,617.25
351,933.98
159,617.25
159,880.50
159,880.50
ED- 00111 -12
PAGE 08 OF 16
DATE OF RUN: 08/13/90
FY 89 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE
FY 91
EARLY CHILD FAMILY ADJ:
FY 89 HAZARDOUS LEVY
(1401)
ACT POPULATION UNDER
3,336.96
FIVE YEARS OF AGE
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE
(1402)
GTR OF (1401) OR 150
AID REPORT, SUM OF
(1403)
REVENUE LIMIT
LINES 19 AND 25)
158,731.25
($87.75 X (1402))
87 PAY 88 HAZ LIMIT
(1404)
88 AGTC X .004
87 PAY 88 HAZ LEVY
(1405)
LEVY AUTHORITY
FY 89 HAZARDOUS
(LSR OF (1403)
SUBSTANCE ADJUST
OR (1404))
(1406)
89 PAY 90 LIMIT
(1407)
89 PAY 90 LEVY
(1408)
FY 91 EARLY CHILD
FAMILY - ADJUST
((1405) - (1407))
(1409)
HANDICAPPED ADULTS
ADJUST (MEMO)
251,539.98
(1410)
OTHER ADJUST (MEMO)
143,074.90
143,074.90
(1411)
TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICE
ADJUSTMENT ((1408)+
108,465.08
(1409) +(1410))
1,819
1,819
159,617.25
351,933.98
159,617.25
159,880.50
159,880.50
ED- 00111 -12
PAGE 08 OF 16
DATE OF RUN: 08/13/90
FY 89 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE
ADJUSTMENT:
(1509)
FY 89 HAZARDOUS LEVY
AUTHORITY (FROM FY 89
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE
AID REPORT, SUM OF
LINES 19 AND 25)
158,731.25
(1510)
87 PAY 88 HAZ LIMIT
158,731.25
(1511)
87 PAY 88 HAZ LEVY
158,731.25
(1512)
FY 89 HAZARDOUS
SUBSTANCE ADJUST
FY 89 BASIC CAPITAL.EXPENDITURE ADJUST:
(22) 88 -89 WADM 6,048.77
(1513) MAXIMUM REVENUE
$153 X (22)
263.25- (1514) 86 AAV X 3 MILLS
(1515) BASIC CEX LEVY
AUTHORITY (LESSER
545.46- OF (1513) OR (1514))
(1516) 87 PAY 88 LIMIT
(1517) 87 PAY 88 LEVY
(1518) FY 89 BASIC CAPITAL
EXPEND ADJUSTMENT
808.71- ((1515) - (1517))
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE ADJUSTMENTS
FY 91 HEALTH & SAFETY ADJUSTMENT:
215,579.55 (1501) FY 91 EST HEALTH & SAFETY
584,663.94 LEVY AUTHORITY PRIOR TO
584,663.94 AID PRORATION (FROM FY 91
HEALTH & SAFETY AID
369,084.39- REPORT, LINE 22) 515,000.00
(1502) FY 91 LEVY ADJUST
FOR AID PRORATION
(FROM FY 91 HEALTH &
SAFETY AID REPORT,
LINE 28)
257,282.35- (1503) 89 PAY 90 INITIAL
H &S LIMIT PRIOR TO
AID PRORATION 671
(1504) 89 PAY 90 H &S LIMIT 671
(1505) 89 PAY 90 H &S LEVY 671
(1506) 90 PAY 91 INITIAL
H &S ADJUSTMENT PRIOR
TO AID PRORATION
925,461.81
1,874,948.88
925,461.81
976,599.00
976,599.00
51 . 137. 19-
OTHER CAPITAL EXPENDITURE ADJUSTMENTS:
(1519) PUPIL VARIANCE
(MEMO)
(1520) BUS TRANSFER ADJUST
(1521) OTHER ADJUST (MEMO)
(1522) TOTAL CAPITAL EXPEND
LIMITATION ADJUST
(1507) +(1512)+
(1518)+(1519)+
(1520)+(1521) 207,937.19-
OTHER LIMITATION ADJUSTMENTS
(1701) GENERAL DEBT SERVICE
800.00 - ERROR ADJUST (MEMO)
800.00 (1801) TECHNICAL COLLEGE
800.00 DEBT SERVICE
ERROR ADJUST (MEMO)
(1802) TECHNICAL COLLEGE OTHER
ERROR ADJUST (MEMO)
((1501) LESS (1503)) 156,800.00-
(1507) TOTAL FY 91 H &S
LEVY ADJUSTMENT
(1501) +(1502) - (1505) 156,800.00-
(1508) 90 PAY 91 H &S ADJUST
FOR AID PRORATION
(1509)- (1506)
TOTAL LIMITATION ADJUSTMENT
(1901) TOTAL LIMITATION ADJUSTMENT
(1106) +(1315) +(1411)+
( 1522) +( 1701) +( 1801 )+
(1802) 540,066.35-
DISTRICT NO. 273 TYPE 1
DISTRICT NAME EDINA
ECSU REGION 11 HENNEPIN
ABATEMENT ADJUSTMENTS
S T A T E D E P A R T M E N T O F E D U C A T I O N
L E V Y L I M I T A T I O N A N D C E R T I F I C A T I O N
1 9 9 0 P A Y A B L E 1 9 9 1
INITIAL ABATEMENT LEVY ADJUSTMENT:
(2001)
SCHOOL TAXES ABATED
GENERAL
28,294,555.02
IN 1989
503,562.45-
(2002)
SCHOOL TAXES ADDED
COMMUNITY SERVICE
463,351.85
IN 1989
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
(2003)
NET CHANGE IN SCHOOL
GENERAL DEBT SERVICE
TAXES.(2001) +(2002)
503,562.45-
(2004)
ABATEMENT RECOVERY
TC OTHER
REVENUE (GTR OF 0 OR
TOTAL
31,617,131.91
( -1 X (2003))
503,562.45
(2005)
FY 91 ABATEMENT AID
182,007.92
(2006)
FY 85 & FY 86 RAILROAD
21,102.73
(2041)
ABATEMENT AID NOT
7,379.75
(2042)
DEDUCTED PREVIOUSLY
13,376.23
(2007)
INITIAL ABATEMENT LEVY
(2044)
ADJUSTMENT ((2004) -
(2045)
(2005) - (2006))
321,554.53
89 PAY 90 CERTIFIED LEVY PLUS AUDITOR
ADJUSTMENT BY FUND:
ADJUSTMENT:
(2008)
GENERAL
28,294,555.02
(2009)
TRANSPORTATION
1,324,975.47
(2010)
COMMUNITY SERVICE
463,351.85
(2011)
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
1,534,249.57
(2012)
GENERAL DEBT SERVICE
(2013)
TC DEBT SERVICE
(2014)
TC OTHER
(2015)
TOTAL
31,617,131.91
CERTIFIED LE'
(2016) GENERAL
(2017) TRANSP
(2018) COM SER
(2019) CAP EXP
(2020) GEN DBT
(2021) TC DEBT
(2022) TC 0TH
TOTAL
✓Y RATIO BY FUND:
(2008)/(2015) .89491214
(2009)/(2015) .04190688
(2010)/(2015) .01465509
(2011)/(2015) .04852589
(2012)/(2015)
(2013)/(2015)
(2014)/(2015)
1.00000000
ABATEMENT AID RATIO BY FUND
(FROM FY 91 ABATEMENT AID REPORT):
(2023) GENERAL (FROM LINE 9) .59599354
(2024) TRANSP (FROM LINE 10)
(2025) COM SER (FROM LINE 11)
(2026) CAP EXP (FROM LINE 12) .03855809
(2027) TOTAL (2023)THRU(2026) .63455163
(2028) EST FY 91 ABATEMENT
AID PRORATION FACTOR .56960000
PRORATED ABA
(2029) GENERAL
(2030) TRANSP
(2031) COM SER
(2032) CAP EXP
(2033) TOTAL
iEMENT
(2023)
(2024)
(2025)
(2026)
All
X
X
X
X
RATIO BY FUND:
(2028) .33947792
(2028)
(2028)
(2028) .02196269
.36144061
ABATEMENT LEVY RATIO BY FUND:
ADJUSTMENT:
(2034)
GENERAL (2016) - (2029)
.55543422
(2035)
TRANSP (2017) - (2030)
.04190688
(2036)
COM SER (2018) - (2031)
:01465509
(2037)
CAP EXP (2019) - (2032)
.02656320
(2020)
GENERAL DEBT SERVICE
(2021)
TC DEBT SERVICE
(2022)
TC OTHER
(2038)
TOTAL
.63855939
INITIAL ABATEMENT LEVY ADJUST
BY FUND:
(2039)
GENERAL(2007)X(2034)
279,695.82
(2040)
TRANSP (2007)X(2035)
21,102.73
(2041)
COM SER(2007)X(2036)
7,379.75
(2042)
CAP EXP(2007)X(2037)
13,376.23
(2043)
GEN DBT(2007)X(2020)
(2044)
TC DBT (2007)X(2021)
(2045)
TC OTH (2007)X(2022)
-
(2046)
TOTAL
321,554.53
FY 89 ABATEMENT AID ADJUSTMENT:
(2047) GENERAL
(2048) TRANSPORTATION
(2049) COMMUNITY SERVICE
(2050) CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
(2051) TOTAL
89 PAY 90 ABATEMENT LEVY
ADJUSTMENT:
(2052)
GENERAL(2039) +(2047)
279,695.82
(2053)
TRANSP (2040) +(2048)
21,102.73
(2054)
COM SER(2041) +(2049)
7,379.75
(2055)
CAP EXP(2042) +(2050)
13,376.23
(2056)
GEN DBT (2040)
(2057)
TC DBT (2041)
(2058)
TC 0TH (2042)
(2059)
TOTAL
321,554.53
ED- 00111-12
PAGE 09 OF 16
DATE OF RUN: 08/13/90
TACONITE ADJUSTMENTS
TACONITE RECEIPTS:
(3001) TAC POT DISTRIBUTION
(3002) MINING /BENEFICATION
(3003) TACONITE POWER PLANT
(3004) TAC PROTECTION FUND
(3005) UNMINED TAC LAND
(3006) TAC RAILROAD GRNDFTR
(3007) OCCUPATION GRNDFTHR
(3008) DEER RIVER GRNDFTHR
(3009) LY TOTAL TAC RECEIPTS
(3001) THRU (3008)
(3010) TAC LEVY GUARANTEE
(3011) LY ADJUSTED RECEIPTS
(3009) - (3010)
TACONITE RATIO:
(3012) TACONITE LEVY LIMIT RATIO
(SEE PAY 90 LEVY
LIMITATION REPORT,
LINE C 978)
LIMIT ELIGIBLE FOR TACONITE ADJUSTMENT
(3013) GEN EDUC LIMIT LESS
89 ANTC X .0682
(3014) MAINT LESS GEN EDUC,
REF & SOD
(3015) TOTAL ELIGIBLE MAINT
(3013) + (3014)
(3016) TRANSPORTATION
(3017) COMMUNITY SERVICE.
(3018) CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
(3019) TC OTHER
(3020) TOTAL ELIGIBLE LIMIT
TACONITE LEVY LIMITATION ADJUSTMENT:
(3021) ADJ RECEIPTS X RATIO
(3022) TOTAL ADJUST ( -1 X LSR
OF (3020) OR (3021))
(3023) TC OTHER .
(3024) CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
(3025) COMMUNITY SERVICE
(3026) TRANSPORTATION
(3027) GENERAL FUND
TACONITE REFERENDUM PAYMENT:
(3028) TAC REFERENDUM PU (GTR
83 -84 OR 89 -90 WADM)
(11) 89 NET TAX CAPACITY
(3029) NY EST TACONITE
REFERENDUM PAYMENT
((3028) X $175) -
((11) X 0.018)
III. COMPARISON OF 1989 PAYABLE 1990 CERTIFIED LEVY PLUS AUDITOR ADJUSTMENTS WITH
1990 PAYABLE 1991 CERTIFIED LEVY PLUS AUDITOR ADJUSTMENTS:
FUND PAY 90 CERT LEVY PAY 91 CERT LEVY INCREASE PERCENT
+ AUDITOR ADJUST + AUDITOR ADJUST (DECREASE) CHANGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- - - - - --
GENERAL 28,294,555.02
TRANSPORTATION 1,324,975.47
COMMUNITY SERVICE 463,351.85
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE 1,534,249.57
GENERAL DEBT SERVICE
TECH COLLEGE DEBT SERVICE
TECH COLLEGE OTHER
TOTAL * 31,617,131.91
* NOTE: AMOUNTS SHOWN REFLECT REDUCTIONS FOR GENERAL AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE DEBT SERVICE EXCESS
AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE DEBT SERVICE AID.
-------------------------------.------------------------------------------- ---------------------- -- - - --
S T A T
E D E P A R T M E
N T O F E D U C A T I O
N
ED-00111-12
DISTRICT NO. 273 TYPE
1 L E V Y L
I M I T A T I O N
A N D C E R T I F I C A T
I O N
DISTRICT NAME EDINA
1 9 9 0 P A Y
A 6 L E 1 9 9 1
PAGE
10 OF 16
ECSU REGION 11 HENNEPIN
DATE
OF RUN: 08/13/90
I. COMPUTATION OF
1990 PAYABLE 1991 LEVY LIMITATION
BY FUND:
FUND
INITIAL LEVY LIMITATION
ABATEMENT
TACONITE
MAXIMUM LEVY
MINIMUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LIMITATION ADJUSTMENT ADJUSTMENT
ADJUSTMENT
LIMITATION
LEVY
GENERAL
28,226,416.27
74,038.10-
279,695.82
28,432,073.99
N/A
TRANSPORTATION
2,259,579.18
257,282.35-
21,102.73
2,023,399.56
N/A
COMMUNITY SERVICE
573,697.75
808.71-
7,379.75
580,268.79
N/A
CAPITAL EXPEND
1,491,545.69
207,937.19-
13,376.23
1,296,984.73
N/A
GEN DEBT SERVICE
N/A
TC DEBT SERVICE
N/A
TC OTHER
N/A
TOTAL
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
32,551,238.89
540,066.35-
321,554.53
32,332,727.07
N/A
II. COMPARISON OF
1989 PAYABLE 1990 LEVY LIMITATION
WITH 1990
PAYABLE 1991 LEVY LIMITATION:
FUND
89 PAY 90
90 PAY 91
INCREASE PERCENT
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LIMITATION
LIMITATION
(DECREASE) CHANGE
GENERAL
28,294,555.02
28,432,073.99
137,,518.97
.49
TRANSPORTATION
1,324,975.47
2,023,399.56
698,424.09
52.71
COMMUNITY SERVICE
583,125.44
580,268.79
2,856.65-
.49-
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
1,534,249.57
1,296,984.73
237,264.84-
15.46 -
GENERAL DEBT SERVICE
TECH COLLEGE DEBT SERVICE
TECH COLLEGE OTHER
TOTAL
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
31,736,905.50
32,332,727.07
595,821.57
---------- ---- -----
1.88
- -
- - --
III. COMPARISON OF 1989 PAYABLE 1990 CERTIFIED LEVY PLUS AUDITOR ADJUSTMENTS WITH
1990 PAYABLE 1991 CERTIFIED LEVY PLUS AUDITOR ADJUSTMENTS:
FUND PAY 90 CERT LEVY PAY 91 CERT LEVY INCREASE PERCENT
+ AUDITOR ADJUST + AUDITOR ADJUST (DECREASE) CHANGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- - - - - --
GENERAL 28,294,555.02
TRANSPORTATION 1,324,975.47
COMMUNITY SERVICE 463,351.85
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE 1,534,249.57
GENERAL DEBT SERVICE
TECH COLLEGE DEBT SERVICE
TECH COLLEGE OTHER
TOTAL * 31,617,131.91
* NOTE: AMOUNTS SHOWN REFLECT REDUCTIONS FOR GENERAL AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE DEBT SERVICE EXCESS
AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE DEBT SERVICE AID.
-------------------------------.------------------------------------------- ---------------------- -- - - --
S T A T E D E P A R T M E N T O F E D U C A T I O N
DISTRICT NO. 273 TYPE 1 L E V Y L I M I T A T I O N A N D C E R T I F I C A T I O N
DISTRICT NAME EDINA 1 9 9 0 P A Y A B L E 1 9 9 1
ECSU REGION 11 HENNEPIN
ED- 00111 -12
PAGE i t OF 16
DATE OF RUN: 08/13/90
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCHOOL DISTRICT /
EQUALIZED LEVIES EXCLUDED FROM
/ ALL OTHER LEVY
COMPONENTS /
TOTAL
/
FUND /
HACA ALLOCATION *
/ (INCLUDED IN HACA
ALLOCATION) /
LEVY
/
----------------- /-------------------------------------/-------------------------------
/
MAXIMUM LEVY / PROPOSED
/ MAXIMUM LEVY
/
PROPOSED /
MAXIMUM LEVY / PROPOSED
/
/
LIMITATION / CERTIFIED LEVY / LIMITATION
/
CERTIFIED LEVY /
LIMITATION / CERTIFIED LEVY /
-----------------/------------------/--'---------------/------------------/------------------/------------
--- --- /-- ------ ----- --
- - -/
GENERAL /
18,610,158.96 /
/ 9,821,915.03
/
/
28,432,073.99
-----------------/------------------/------------------/------------------/------------------/------------
------ /----- ----- --- - -
- - -/
TRANSPORTATION /
1,429,598.18 /
/ 593,801.38
/
/
2,023,399.56
----------------- /------------------
/------------------ /------------------
/------------------
/------------------
COMMUNITY
SERVICE /
NONE / NONE
/ 580,268.79
/
/
580,268.79
-----------------/------------------/------------------/------------------/------------------
CAPITAL
EXPENDITURE /
1,203,936.30 /
/ 93,048.43
/
/
1,296,984.73
-----------------/------------------/------------------/------------------/------------------/----------
------- - /------ --- ---- - -
- - -/
GENERAL
DEBT SERVICE /
NONE / NONE
/
TECHNICAL COLLEGE/
DEBT SERVICE /
NONE / NONE
-----------------/------------------/------------------/------------------
------ /------------- --
- - -/
TECHNICAL COLLEGE/
/
/------------------/------------
OTHER /
NONE / NONE
-----------------/------------------/------------------/------------------/------------------/-------
------- ---- /- ------ ------ - -
- --/
TOTAL LEVY
BEFORE ADJUSTMENT/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
21,243,693.44 /
/ 11,089,033.63
/
/
32,332,727.07
----- -- --- /- ------------ - -
- - -/
• THE FOLLOWING EQUALIZED
LEVIES ARE EXCLUDED FROM
HACA ALLOCATION:
/
CERTIFIED LEVY
REDUCTION
GENERAL EDUCATION,
SUPPLEMENTAL, BASIC TRANSPORTATION,
CAPITAL
/
FOR GENERAL DEBT
SERVICE
EXPENDITURE FACILITIES,
AND CAPITAL EXPENDITURE EQUIPMENT.
/
EXCESS
/------------------------------
/------------- --
- - -/
THE COUNTY AUDITOR IS
REQUIRED BY MINNESOTA STATUTES
275.16 TO REDUCE ANY
/
CERTIFIED LEVY
REDUCTION
CERTIFIED LEVY THAT IS GREATER THAN THE MAXIMUM LEVY
LIMITATION.
/
FOR TECHNICAL
COLLEGE
/
DEBT SERVICE EXCESS
THE COUNTY AUDITOR MUST REDUCE THE DEBT SERVICE LEVIES
BY THE AMOUNT OF THE
/-------------------------------------
------------/
CERTIFIED EXCESS UNLESS THE SCHOOL BOARD DIRECTS THE
AUDITOR BY RESOLUTION
/
REDUCTION TO BE
MADE BY
NOT TO REDUCE THE LEVY BY PART OR ALL OF THE EXCESS.
THE COUNTY AUDITOR
/
COUNTY AUDITOR
FOR STATE
MUST ALSO REDUCE THE
TECHNICAL COLLEGE DEBT SERVICE
LEVY BY THE AMOUNT OF
/
TC DEBT SERVICE
AID
THE STATE AID SHOWN AT
RIGHT.
PUPIL DATA TO BE INCLUDED ON THE NOTICE OF PROPOSED
PROPERTY TAXES IS AS
/
TOTAL CERTIFIED
LEVY
FOLLOWS: 1988 -89 AVERAGE DAILY MEMBERSHIP
5,352.63
/
AFTER ADJUSTMENTS
1989 -90 ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY MEMBERSHIP
5,580.00
-------------------------------------
-------- ------
INCREASE OR
(DECREASE) FROM 1988 -89 TO 1989 -90 227.37
THE CERTIFIED LEVY LISTED ABOVE IS THE LEVY NOTED
SCHOOL DISTRICTS CERTIFYING LESS THAN THE MAXIMUM LEVY LIMITATION FOR ANY BY THE SCHOOL BOARD FOR TAXES PAYABLE IN 1991.
FUND MUST COMPLETE THE APPROPRIATE SECTIONS OF PAGES 12 THROUGH 16 AS THE DEBT SERVICE EXCESS IS CERTIFIED PURSUANT TO
NEEDED TO DOCUMENT THE SPECIFIC AMOUNTS CERTIFIED FOR EACH LEVY COMPONENT. MINNESOTA STATUTES 475.61.
THE SCHOOL DISTRICT MUST SUBMIT THE COMPLETED ORIGINAL OF THIS FORM TO THE SIGNATURE OF
HOME COUNTY AUDITOR BY SEPTEMBER 1, 1990. A DUPLICATED COPY MUST BE SCHOOL BOARD CLERK
SUBMITTED TO THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, EDUCATION FINANCE &
ANALYSIS. BY SEPTEMBER 15. igQ0. —Tr nc rrnTTrTrATT -1
GENERAL FUND FOOTNOTES:
*1 DISTRICT UNDERLEVY IN THIS COMPONENT WILL RESULT IN PROPORTIONATE REDUCTION IN CORRESPONDING STATE AID.
*2 TACONITE DISTRICTS MUST LEVY THIS AMOUNT TO RECEIVE MAXIMUM PAYMENTS PURSUANT TO M.S. 298.28, SUED. 1, CLAUSE 3C.
*3 A DISTRICT MUST LEVY THE MAXIMUM FOR GENERAL EDUCATION (162) BEFORE ANY AMOUNT MAY BE LEVIED FOR OPERATING DEBT (174).
*4 DISTRICTS IN STATUTORY OPERATING DEBT MUST LEVY THIS AMOUNT (M.S. 275.125, SUBD. 9A).
*5 THE CERTIFIED LEVY COMPONENTS ON PAGES 12 AND 13 MUST ADD UP EXACTLY TO THE AMOUNT OF THE CERTIFIED GENERAL LEVY ON
PAGE it OF 16.
*6 A DISTRICT MUST LEVY THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT FOR THIS LEVY CATEGORY.
S
T A T E D E P
A R T M
E N T
O F E D U C A T I O N
ED- 00111 -12
DISTRICT NO. 273 TYPE 1
L E V
Y L I M I T A
T I O N
A N
D C E R T I F I C A T I O N
DISTRICT. NAME EDINA
1 9 9
0 P A
Y A B
L E 1 9 9 1
PAGE 12 OF 16
ECSU REGION 11 HENNEPIN
DATE OF RUN: 08/13/90
(COMPLETED
ONLY BY DISTRICTS THAT CERTIFY LESS
THAN
THE MAXIMUM GENERAL LEVY LIMITATION)
(NOTE: DISTRICTS
COMPLETING THIS
PAGE
MUST ALSO COMPLETE PAGE 13 OF
16.)
* * ** PROPOSED * * **
* * ** PROPOSED * * **
LIMITATION COMPONENTS
LIMITATION
/CERTIFIED LEVY
*5 /
LIMITATION COMPONENTS
LIMITATION
/CERTIFIED LEVY *5 /
INITIAL LIMITATIONS:
(162)
/
/
(208)
GENERAL EDUCATION
18,232,556.50
/
/
DESEGREGATION
(161)
(209)
EDUC DIST GENERAL EDU
/
/
UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
17,508.00
*6
�-- --- ------ -- - -
- - -�
------------- - - - - -�
( 158 )
(210)
SUPPLEMENTAL
377,602.46
/
/
EDUC DISTRICT UNEMPL INS
*1
/------------- - --
- -/
*6
/--------- --- - - - - - -/
(169)
/
/
(211)
SPECIAL EDUCATION
490,057.19
/
/
EDUCATION DISTRICT
/------------- - --
- -/
*6
/- ------------ -- - - -/
(174)
/
/
(212)
OPERATING DEBT
/
/
VOCATIONAL COOP
*3
/------------- - -
- --/
*6
/------------- - - - - -/
(182)
/
/
(213)
STATUTORY OPER DEBT
/
/
JUDGMENT
*4
/------------- - -
- - -/
/---------- --- - - - - -/
(187)
/
/
(214)
INTERDISTRICT COOP
/
/
CONSOLIDATION
/------------- - --
- -/
/------------- - - - - -/
(192)
/
/
(215)
REGULAR REFERENDUM
9,108,692.12
/
/
HEALTH INS (MINNEAPOLIS)
/-------- ----- - -
- - -/
/----------- -- - - - - -/
(188)
/
/
(216)
EDUC DIST REFERENDUM
/
/
RETIREMENT (MINNEAPOLIS)
*6
/------------- - -
- - -/
/------- --- --- -- -- -/
(217)
TACONITE REFERENDUM
/
/
SEVERANCE
*2
/------------- - -
- - -/
/- ------------ - - - - -/
(200)
/
/
(218)
COOP & COMBINATION
/
/
STATE AUDIT PETITION
*1
--- -------- -- - -
- - -�
------- ------ - -- - -�
(207)
(220)
INTERMEDIATE DISTRICT
/
/
SUBTOTAL -- INITIAL GENERAL
/-- ------ ---- -- -
- - -/
FUND LEVY
28,226,416.27
/------------- - - - - -/
GENERAL FUND FOOTNOTES:
*1 DISTRICT UNDERLEVY IN THIS COMPONENT WILL RESULT IN PROPORTIONATE REDUCTION IN CORRESPONDING STATE AID.
*2 TACONITE DISTRICTS MUST LEVY THIS AMOUNT TO RECEIVE MAXIMUM PAYMENTS PURSUANT TO M.S. 298.28, SUED. 1, CLAUSE 3C.
*3 A DISTRICT MUST LEVY THE MAXIMUM FOR GENERAL EDUCATION (162) BEFORE ANY AMOUNT MAY BE LEVIED FOR OPERATING DEBT (174).
*4 DISTRICTS IN STATUTORY OPERATING DEBT MUST LEVY THIS AMOUNT (M.S. 275.125, SUBD. 9A).
*5 THE CERTIFIED LEVY COMPONENTS ON PAGES 12 AND 13 MUST ADD UP EXACTLY TO THE AMOUNT OF THE CERTIFIED GENERAL LEVY ON
PAGE it OF 16.
*6 A DISTRICT MUST LEVY THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT FOR THIS LEVY CATEGORY.
S T A T E D E P A R T M E N T O F E D U C A T I O N ED- 00111 -12
DISTRICT NO. 273 TYPE 1 L E V Y L I M I T A T I O N A N D C E R T I F I C A T I O N
DISTRICT NAME EDINA 1 9 9 0 P A Y A B L E 1 9 9 1 PAGE 13 OF 16
ECSU REGION 11 HENNEPIN DATE OF RUN: 08/13/90
(COMPLETED ONLY BY DISTRICTS THAT CERTIFY LESS THAN THE MAXIMUM GENERAL FUND LEVY LIMITATION)
(NOTE: DISTRICTS COMPLETING THIS PAGE MUST ALSO COMPLETE PAGE 12 OF 16.)
LIMITATION COMPONENTS
LIMITATION
*** PROPOSED * **
/CERTIFIED LEVY *5 /
LIMITATION COMPONENTS
* ** PROPOSED * **
LIMITATION /CERTIFIED LEVY *5 /
ADJUSTMENTS:
(1036)
(1104)
FY 91
GEN EDUC ADJ
/
/
DEBT SURPLUS TRANSFER ADO
*1
/-------------
- - - - -/
/------ ----- -- -- - - -/
(1040)
/
/
(1105)
FY 91
SUPPLEMENTAL ADJ
/
/
OTHER ADJUST (MEMO)
*1
/---
---------- - - - --/
/----- -- -- ---- - - -- -/
(1087)
/
/
(2052)
FY 89
GEN EDUC ADJUST
172,563.92 -/
172,563.92 -/
ABATEMENT ADJUST
279,695.82
(1093)
/-----
/
---- --- - - - - - -/
/
(3027)
/------------ - - - - - -/
FY 89
SUPPLEMENTAL ADJ
24,745.91 -/
24,745.91 -/
TACONITE ADJUST
(1101)
/--------- ---- - - - - -/
/- ------- ----- - -- - -/
FY 89
SPECIAL EDUC ADJUST
109,640.38
/
/
SUBTOTAL:
(1102)
/-- --- -- --------- - -/
ADJUSTMENTS
205,657.72
/
/.
/- ------------ - - - - -/
FY 89
EXCEPT NEED ADJUST
/
/
SUBTOTAL:
(1103)
*1
/-- ---
----------- --/
INITIAL GENERAL FUND
28,226,416.27
/
/
(FROM PAGE 12 OF 16)
/------------- - - - - -/
MAINT
PU VARIANCE
13,631.35
/
/-------------
- - - - -/
TOTAL GENERAL FUND
28,432,073.99
*5
/------------- - - -- -/
GENERAL FUND FOOTNOTES (CONTINUED):
*1 DISTRICT UNDERLEVY IN THIS COMPONENT WILL RESULT IN PROPORTIONATE REDUCTION IN CORRESPONDING STATE AID.
►5 THE CERTIFIED LEVY COMPONENTS ON PAGES 12 AND 13 MUST ADD UP EXACTLY TO THE AMOUNT OF THE CERTIFIED GENERAL FUND LEVY
ON PAGE 11 OF 16.
TRANSPORTATION FOOTNOTES:
*1 DISTRICT UNDERLEVY IN THIS COMPONENT WILL RESULT IN PROPORTIONATE REDUCTION IN CORRESPONDING STATE AID.
*2 THE CERTIFIED LEVY COMPONENTS MUST ADD UP EXACTLY TO THE AMOUNT OF THE CERTIFIED TRANSPORTATION LEVY ON PAGE 11 OF 16.
S T A
T E D E P A
R T M E
N T O F E D U C A T I O N
ED- 00111 -12
DISTRICT NO. 273 TYPE 1
L E V Y
L I M I T A T
I O N
A N D C E R T I F I C A T I
O N
DISTRICT NAME EDINA
1 9 9 0
P A Y
A B L E 1 9 9 1
PAGE 14 OF 16
ECSU REGION 11 HENNEPIN
DATE OF RUN: 08/13/90
(COMPLETED
ONLY BY
DISTRICTS THAT
CERTIFY
LESS THAN THE MAXIMUM TRANSPORTATION LEVY LIMITATION)
* ** PROPOSED
* **
* ** PROPOSED * **
LIMITATION COMPONENTS
LIMITATION
/CERTIFIED LEVY
*2 /
LIMITATION COMPONENTS
LIMITATION
/CERTIFIED LEVY *2
/
(305)
/
/
(1301)
BASIC TRANSPORTATION
1,429,598.18
/
/
OFF- FORMULA ADJUST
*1
/-------------
- - - - -/
(MEMO)
3,336.96
(313)
/
/
/------------- - - - - -/
NONREGULAR TRANS
100,755.00
/
/
(1305)
*1
/-------------
- - - - -/
FY 90 CONTRACT ADJUST
(317)
/
/
/------- ------ - -- - -/
CONTRACT TRANS
103,488.00
/
/
(1309)
/----------- --
-- -- -/
FY 89 NONREGULAR ADJUST
108,465.08
(332)
/
/
/--- ---------- - - - --/
EXCESS
/
/
(1313)
TRANSPORTATION
559,872.00
/
/
FY 89 EXCESS ADJUST
369,084.39-
/ 369,084.39-
/
-------------
- -- - -/
/----- -------- -- -- -/
(333)
/
/
(1314)
BUS PURCHASE
65,866.00
/
/
OTHER ADJUST
/---- ---------
-- - - -/
(MEMO)
(334)
/
/
/-- ----------- - - - - -/
LEASED SCHOOL IN
/
/
(2053)
OTHER DISTRICT
/
/
ABATEMENT ADJUST
21,102.73
(335)
(3026)
-
POST- SECONDARY
/
/
TACONITE
TRANSPORTATION
/
/
ADJUST
/-- -----------
- - - - -/
/------------- - - - --/
TOTAL
TRANSPORTATION
2,023,399.56
*2
/------------- - - - - -/
TRANSPORTATION FOOTNOTES:
*1 DISTRICT UNDERLEVY IN THIS COMPONENT WILL RESULT IN PROPORTIONATE REDUCTION IN CORRESPONDING STATE AID.
*2 THE CERTIFIED LEVY COMPONENTS MUST ADD UP EXACTLY TO THE AMOUNT OF THE CERTIFIED TRANSPORTATION LEVY ON PAGE 11 OF 16.
S T A T E
D E P A R T M E N T
O F E D U C A T I O N
ED- 00111 -12
DISTRICT NO. 273 TYPE 1
L E V Y L I
M I T A T I O N A N D
C E R T I F I C A T I O N
DISTRICT NAME EDINA
1 9 9 0 P A Y A B L
E 1 9 9 1
ECSU REGION 11 HENNEPIN
PAGE
15 OF 16
DATE
OF RUN: 08/13/90
(COMPLETED ONLY BY DISTRICTS THAT CERTIFY
LESS THAN THE MAXIMUM COMMUNITY EDUCATION OR CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
LEVY
LIMITATION)
COMMUNITY EDUCATION:
*
** PROPOSED * **
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE:
* **
PROPOSED * **
LIMITATION COMPONENTS
LIMITATION /CERTIFIED
LEVY *3 /
LIMITATION COMPONENTS
LIMITATION
/CERTIFIED
LEVY *6 /
(410)
/
/
(509)
BASIC COMMUNITY'EDUC
265,748.80 /
/
FACILITIES
802,624.20
(412)
*1 /-------------
/
- - - - -/
/
*1
/---
---------- - - - - -/
(515)
COMMUNITY ED GRANDFATHER
EQUIPMENT
401,312.10
/-------------
- - - - -/
*1
/- ------------
- -- --/
(417)
(533)
EARLY CHILD FAMILY
159,617.25 /
/
HEALTH & SAFETY
251,190.00
(419)
*2 /--
/
----- ------ - - - - -/
/
*4
/-- --------
--- - - - - -/
(534)
HANDICAPPED ADULTS
3,300.00 /
/
ENERGY LOAN
(420)
/-------------
- - - --/
(535)
/-----
/
--- ----- - - - - -/
/
ADULT BASIC EDUCATION
145,031.70 /
/
COOP BUILDING REPAIR
(1408)
/-------------
- - - - -/
/--------- ---- - - - - -/
FY 91 EARLY CHILD
/
/
(536)
FAMILY ADJUST
. 263.25 -/
263.25- /
DOWN PAYMENT
*2 /-
------ ------ - - -- -/
/----- -------- - - - - -/
(1409)
/
/
(537)
HANDICAPPED ADULTS ADO
545.46 -/
545.46- /
BUILDING LEASE
36,419.39
/-----------
-- - - - - -/
/------------- - - - - -/
(1410)
(1518)
OTHER ADJUST (MEMO)
/
/
FY 89 CEX BASIC ADJUST
51,137.19 -/
51,137.19- /
(2054)
/--
/
----------- - - - --/
/
(1512)
/------------ - - - - - -/
ABATEMENT ADJUSTMENT
7,379.75 /
/
FY 89 HAZARDOUS ADJUST
(3025)
/----- -------- -- - - -/
/ /
/------------- - - - - -/
(1507)
TACONITE ADJUSTMENT
/
/
FY 91 HEALTH & SFTY ADO
156,800.00 -/
156,800.00- /
/-------------
- - - --/
*5
/------------- - - - - -/
( 1519)
TOTAL COMMUNITY EDUCATION
580,268.79 /
/
PUPIL VARIANCE (MEMO)
*3 /-------------
- - - - -/
/--- ---- ------ - - - - -/
( 1520)
COMMUNITY EDUCATION AND CAPITAL
EXPENDITURE FOOTNOTES:
BUS TRANSFER ADJUST
*1 DISTRICT UNDERLEVY IN THIS
COMPONENT WILL
RESULT IN PROPORTIONATE
(1521)
REDUCTION IN CORRESPONDING
STATE AID.
OTHER ADJUST (MEMO)
*2 DISTRICT UNDERLEVY IN THIS
COMPONENT WILL
RESULT IN PROPORTIONATE
/-------------
- - - - -/
REDUCTION IN CORRESPONDING
STATE AID. DISTRICT MUST PROVIDE A
(2055)
COMMUNITY EDUCATION PROGRAM
TO QUALIFY FOR
THIS LEVY.
ABATEMENT ADJUST
13,376.23
*3 THE CERTIFIED LEVY COMPONENTS-MUST ADD UP
EXACTLY TO THE AMOUNT
/-------------
- - - - -/
OF THE CERTIFIED COMMUNITY
EDUCATION LEVY
ON PAGE 11 OF 16.
(3024)
*4 DISTRICT UNDERLEVY BELOW THE AMOUNT SHOWN
ON PAGE 5, LINE 529
TACONITE ADJUST
WILL RESULT IN PROPORTIONATE
REDUCTION IN
CORRESPONDING STATE AID.
/-------------
- - - - -/
*5 DISTRICT UNDERLEVY BELOW THE
AMOUNT SHOWN
ON PAGE 8, LINE 1506
WILL RESULT IN PROPORTIONATE
REDUCTION IN
CORRESPONDING STATE AID.
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPEND
1,296,984.73
*6 THE CERTIFIED LEVY COMPONENTS
MUST ADD UP
EXACTLY TO THE AMOUNT OF
*6
/-------------
- - - - -/
THE CERTIFIED CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
-LEVY ON
PAGE 11 OF 16.
273 y y
1.; 1
i
DISTRICT NO. EDINA TC OTHER LEVY L.IM1
DISTRICT NAM;' HENNEPIN THE MAXIMUM GENERAL DEBT SERVICE OR
ECSU REGION THAT CERTIFY LESS THAN * ** PROPOSED * **
(COMPLETED ONLY BY DISTRICTS
TECHNICAL COLLEGE OTHER: LIMITATION /CERTIFIED LEVY *3/
GENERAL DEBT SERVICE:
LIMITATION COMPONENTS
(701,)
DEBT SERVICE FACILITIES
(706)
ADJ BASIC DEBT SERVICE
( 707 )
DEBT SERVICE EQUIPMENT
( 1701 )
ERROR ADJUSTMENT (MEMO)
(2056)
ABATEMENT ADJUSTMENT
TOTAL GENERAL
DEBT SERVICE
* ** PROPOSED * * *2 /
LIMITATION CERTIFIED LEVY /
/ - - - -- -/
/ --- - - - - --/
/ - - - - - -/
/ - - - -- -/
/ ---- - - - - -/
LIMITATION COMPONENTS
(803)
TC UNEMPLOYMENT INS
(804)
TC CONSTRUCTION
(1B02)
TC OTHER LIMITATION
ADJUSTMENT (MEMO)
(2058)
ABATEMENT ADJUSTMENT
(3023)
TACONITE ADJUSTMENT
TOTAL TC OTHER
PAGE 11 OF 16.
GENERAL DEBT SERVICE FOOTNOTES: THIS LEVY COMPONENT. THE AMOUNT OF
MAXIMUM AMOUNT FOR UBD 3, SHOULD CERTIFYETpEBTASERVICEALEVY BBT SERVICE LEVY
M EXACTLY TO THE AMOUNT OF 75E CERTIFIED GENERAL DEBT SERVICE LEVY R PART OF THE
*1 DISTRICT MUST LEVY THE 475.61,
ON PAGE U OF 16. THE COUNTY AUDITOR SHALL REDUCE
*2 THE CERTIFIED LEVY COMPONENTS MUST ADD UP E
DISTRICTS CERTIFYING A OEBTTEEXCESS SERVICE XCESS PURSUANT TO M.S.
D
IS DIRECTS THE AUDITOR BY RESOLUTION NOT TO REDUCE THE LEVY BY AL
'AND INDICATE THE CERTIFIEDTEXCESS, UNLESS THE SCHOOL BOARD
EXCESS.
COLLEGE OTHER FOOTNOTE:
F THE CERTIFIED TC OTHER LEVY ON PAGE it OF 1
TECHNICAL TLY TO THE AMOUNT O
*3 THE CERTIFIED LEVY COMPONENTS MUST ADD UP EXAC
/
- - - - --/
/
- -- - -/
/
- - - - -/
/
-- - - -/
/
- - - - -/
*3 /- -----------
PAGE 11 OF 16.
GENERAL DEBT SERVICE FOOTNOTES: THIS LEVY COMPONENT. THE AMOUNT OF
MAXIMUM AMOUNT FOR UBD 3, SHOULD CERTIFYETpEBTASERVICEALEVY BBT SERVICE LEVY
M EXACTLY TO THE AMOUNT OF 75E CERTIFIED GENERAL DEBT SERVICE LEVY R PART OF THE
*1 DISTRICT MUST LEVY THE 475.61,
ON PAGE U OF 16. THE COUNTY AUDITOR SHALL REDUCE
*2 THE CERTIFIED LEVY COMPONENTS MUST ADD UP E
DISTRICTS CERTIFYING A OEBTTEEXCESS SERVICE XCESS PURSUANT TO M.S.
D
IS DIRECTS THE AUDITOR BY RESOLUTION NOT TO REDUCE THE LEVY BY AL
'AND INDICATE THE CERTIFIEDTEXCESS, UNLESS THE SCHOOL BOARD
EXCESS.
COLLEGE OTHER FOOTNOTE:
F THE CERTIFIED TC OTHER LEVY ON PAGE it OF 1
TECHNICAL TLY TO THE AMOUNT O
*3 THE CERTIFIED LEVY COMPONENTS MUST ADD UP EXAC
1995 LAWS of MINNESOTA for 1988 Ch. 719, Art. 12
Sec. 22. Minnesota Statutes 1987 Supplement, section 469.177, subdivi-
sion 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. PRIOR PI.ANNF,D IMPROVEMENTS. The authority shall, after
diligent search, accompany its request for certification to the county auditor
pursuant to subdivision I, or its notice of district enlargement pursuant to
section 469.175, subdivision 4, with a listing of all properties within the tax
increment financing district or area of enlargement for which building permits
have been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding approval of the
tax increment financing plan by the municipality pursuant to section 469.175,
subdivision 3. The county auditor shall increase the original assessed value of
the district by the assessed valuation of the impfove tems each improvement
for which the a building permit was issued; exetu4ittg the assessed %-elnatien of
impfo%- entenis (ef which it httihling Vern it was iyst►et' during the theee-momh
flatted in"oedimely preceding said attprevel of the tes inefentent finaneing phm;
es eertified by the assessef.
Sec. 23. Minnesota Statutes 1987 Supplement, section 469.177, is amended
by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 9. DIS'1'RIBU'I'IONS OF EXCESS TAXES ON CAPTURED VALUE.
Ji!) If the amount of tax paid on captured value exceeds the amount of tax
increment, the county auditor shall distribute the excess to the municipality,
county, and school district as follows: each governmental unit's share of the
excess equals — —
the total amount of the excess for life tax increment financing district,
multiplied by
(2Q a fraction, the numerator of which is the current mill rate of the overn-
mental unit less the governmental unit's mill rate for the year the original mill
rate for the district was certified in no case may this amount be less than zero
and the denominator of which is the sum of the numerators for the municipali-
county, and school district.
11' the entire increase in the mill tale is attributable to a ti! t district, other
than II►e municipality, county, or school district, then the excess must be distrib-
uted to the municipality, county, and school district in proportion to their
respective mill rates.
(ID file amounts distributed shall be deducted in computing the levy limits
of the Ia? iU district for the succeeding taxable year.
UL In the case of distributions to a school district, life county auditor shall
report amounts distributed to the commissioner of education in the same man-
ner as provided for excess increments under section 469.176, subdivision 2 and
the distribution shall be treated as an excess increment for vurvoses of section
124.214, subdivision 3.
New language is indicated by underline, deletions by strikeeut.
Ch. 719, Art. 12 LAWS of MINNESOTA for 1988 1996
Sec. 24. Minnesota Statutes 1987 Supplement, section 469.177, is amended
by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 10. PAYMENT TO SCHOOL FOR REFERENDUM LEVY. The
provision- this subdivision apply to tax increment financing districts and
ro'ects for which certification was requested before May 1 1988, that are
located in a school district in which the voters have approved new millagc or an
increase in millatte after the tax increment ftnancinR district was certified if
there are no outstanding bonds on May 1, 1988, to which increment from the
district is lep deed, or Q if the referendum is approved after May 1 1988, and
there arc no bonds outstanding at the lime the referendum is approved, that
were issued before May 1 1988, or v if the referendum increasing the mill rate
was approved after the most recent issue of bonds to which increment from the
district is lep deed. If clause DI or aTIP IJe.s the authority must annually pay
to the school district an amount of increment equal to the increment that is
attributable to the increase in the mill rate under the referendum. 11 __ L!ause
applies, upon approval by a majority .vole of the governing body of the munici-
alit and the school board, the authority must pal to the school district an
amount of increment equal to life increment that is attributable to the increase
in the mill rate under the referendum. The amounts of these increments may be
expended and must be treated —by the school district in the same manner as
provided for the revenues derived from the referendum levy approved b the
voters.
Sec. 25. Minnesota Statutes 1987 Supplement, section 469.179, is amended
to read:
469.179 EXISTING PROJECTS,
Subdivision 1. EXEMPTION. The provisions of sections 469.174 to 469.178
shall not affect any project for which tax increment certification was requested
pursuant to law prior to August 1, 1979, or any project carried on by an
authority pursuant to section 469.033, subdivision 5,•with respect to which the
governing body has by resolution designated properties for inclusion in (lie
district prior to August I, 1979, except:
(1) as otherwise expressly provided in sections 469.174 to 469.178; or
(2) as an authority elects to proceed with an existing district, under the
provisions of sections 469.174 to 469.178; or
(3) that any enlargements of the 9engr$1►hie wren of an e*i4ttttg tax inere-
ment ftneneing subgecittew to ?4egnst +; 4979; shall be eeeemfAished in
eeeerdenee with end shell subjeet the propem added es a reselt.ef the ertlarge-
inent to the terms end eenditietts of seeiien 469.1?4 to 469. i?8 as provided in
subdivision 2; or
(4) that beginning with testes payable in 49$8; section 469.177, subdivision
3, clause (b), shall apply to all development districts created pursuant to Minne-
sota Statutes 1978, chapter 472A, or any special law, prior to August 1, 1979.
New language is indicated by underline, deletions by stri#eeot.
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: August 27, 1990
TO: Gordon Hughes
FROM: Eric Anderso4,
RE: Excess increments for Richfield S.D. Referendum
As per your request, the following reflects the excess increment
generated from the Richfield school district referendum on
district 1201 and 1203 for pay 1990 taxes.
Captured Percentage
Tax x Increase in the = Excess
Capacity Extension Rate Increment
1201 1,651,491 5.3% $ 87,529.02
1203 0 5.3% .00
Total Excess Increment $ 81,529.02
Source: Hennepin County
.Dept. of Property Tax
o qe
r� � =-
J
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: i4 ayor and Council Members
Agenda Item #Ix.c
g
From:
Consent
K]
Bob Kojetin, Director
Park and Recreation Dent.
Information Only
❑
Date: August 31, 1990-
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject: Set hearing date for
To Council
October 1, 1990
Action
❑Motion
Tree trimming (Country Club
District), Northeast section of
❑
Resolution
Edina.
Ordinance
❑
Recommendation:
Set hearing date - October 1, 1990 Boulevard Tree Trimming
Info /Background:
The Park and Recreation staff has investigated boulevard trees to be trimmed in the
Country Club District and.staff recommends hearing the projects on October 1, 1990.
Improvement Location
Est. Cost
Tree Trimming An area bounded by Highway 100 on the Total $125,000
(est. 2000 trees) West, 54th Street on the South, the per dwelling $155
Eastern City boundary line on the East
and the Northern City boundary line on
the North.
The project would be funded by special assessment.
f_I
(� A. l
o e: > V4
ch
o
' �•' ~�bRPOMtbO�
IBtlB
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis Hoffman
City Engineer
Date: 4 September, 1990
Subject: Request for Quit Claim
Deed - Lot 1 and Part
of Lot 2, Block 2,
Interlachen Hills
Addition
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # IX. E.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
El
To Council
Action 0
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Authorize Mayor to sign Quit Claim Deed for release of public interests for
abandoned sanitary sewer and water main line running across building site.
Info /Background:
This is also a part of the site development for the Lincoln project. The City
at one time had a sanitary sewer and water main running across the property in
the area shaded in yellow. We find no easements for those lines being recorded.
However, again, the title company and mortgage firms are concerned about the
issue. The developer and City Attorney have discussed this issue. The recommen-
dation is to release any claim the City may have by authorizing the.Mayor to
sign a Quit Claim Deed over the shaded portion of the sketch as to any interest
for public purpose.
L _. / - S 89 °57'09 E 379.95 m� r , , . '
SkAL
1
s _
p
• - -.
La`
V RI
N
\• '. y,. ���reG_. _ � � .. / 892`
15T FLOOR '8 1.0 FT. _ - - 11 L." } �•~a - '1
GARAGE SL.%:6- 881.0 :F - _ _._ - V 1 = _ 3 \ 1 -
n7G:o'hb33 679.6'
',9: ,:rd!�dJf' ✓''r' "ii Sf'�.,f.;,� i=` 1 1 ,1 09 • �` e o; �I1T ,
,
BUILDING -O
Af1v t: ?I,ES
ID 9
t�
�
�Oa 6r,' Fl00F EL. 691.0 Bov ` y `+ \�) ✓..: --
7.
ROUGH G
1
.,; . AO a. .. 90� ,�\ RCP G f.009 y 'b - •' ' m \\ � -
O m
,I ,1m \ /• THIS COa:-
�.��. \ .• 1 ! '• �OE51GN a
NO q / POOL
ow
•F \ 1.PB� t - _'_.��• 689
688
_.- :�..• -. .. - - �. BBB .__ � `_. l'� / � C \ •}•+`.•\
RC RAMP -SEE ARCH. 8E � � •` 'y 1
1 993 ., , � O• t'�` �\
L_Ff� ` I L •I -:59.r , 020 et 82
_ BB! J63
682 , 0 100 �•
o I
4' •0 884 1OQA ,�0 ^y, - .v 1. �• N05 r�� •\ ,\
80.0
,
81 L.F. !0" RCP Q 0.30
10' RCP 20.!07.. l •F.EE,'..._ 82 L,f. -30'
e 0.307, RCP 2 0.307.
. —TREE r1A55 --�\ GARAGE 5-A6 +881.0
eeo - � •
L A 96
\ N 89'5 B' 00' w 355 .00 \ a .894.5 -
(MEAS. f DE . ^: I �, , 9 % - •� e /,I It.
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
• , "�DRPORNt�
BBB
To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER
Agenda Item #
Lx—.F
From: MARCELLA DAERN, CLERK
Consent
Fx�
Information Only
❑
Date: AUGUST 31, 1990
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject: TEMPORARY ON -SALE
x
To Council
LIQUOR LICENSE FOR
EDINAMITE
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
i
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Council approval of issuance of a temporary On -Sale Liquor License to
The Edina Foundation in connection with EDINAMITE to be held on November 10.
Info /Background:
The Edina Foundation has applied for a Temporary On -Sale Liquor License in
connection with EDINAMITE to be held at Edinborough Park on November 10, 1990.
The application complies with the requirements of Ordinance No. 902 relating to
a Temporary On -Sale Liquor License in connection with The Edina Foundation Ball
and will be issued under the license of Interlachen Country Club.
A 4�.N
o e
�aeB
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & Council Members
From: Susan Wohlrabe
Date: August 31, 1990
Subject:
COUNCIL LIAISON MEETINGS
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # XII.A.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
To Council
Action EE Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
At the Council Meeting of August 20th, it was recommended that liaison meetings
with boards /commissions be held every other year, which would then again begin
in 1992. It was also suggested that these meetings not be held on Council Meeting
nights, but rather on either the second or fourth Monday of every other month
at 5:00 PM. Upon your recommendation, I will set this up for 1992.
Info /Background:
From June 19, 1989, through August 20, 1990, the-City Council had liaison meetings
with the boards /commissions every other month at 6:00 PM prior to the second
Council Meeting of the month.
❑ STORM SEWER
❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY
❑ SANITARY SEWER
❑ PERMANENT STREET
SURFACING WITH
CURB AND GUTTER
DATE:
❑ WATER MAIN
❑ STREET LIGHTING
❑ OTHER:
To the Mayor and City Council:
The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to order improvements as indicated above
to the locations listed below.
LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME
LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME
LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME
LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME
between
' and
and
ADDRESS
ADDRESS
and
ADDRESS
and
ADDRESS
IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT
THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE
PROPERTIES BENEFITTING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE
COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES.
OWNER'S SIGNATURE
(ALL OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY MUST SIGN)
This petition was circulated by:
ADDRESS
PHONE
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages.
AUGUST 1990
ADDRESS
between
ADDRESS
between
ADDRESS
between
ADDRESS
and
ADDRESS
ADDRESS
and
ADDRESS
and
ADDRESS
IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT
THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE
PROPERTIES BENEFITTING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE
COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES.
OWNER'S SIGNATURE
(ALL OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY MUST SIGN)
This petition was circulated by:
ADDRESS
PHONE
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages.
AUGUST 1990
OWNER'S SIGNATURE ADDRESS PHONE
(ALL OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY MUST SIGN
s!
t"
ch
�o
lase
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor and Council
From: John Wallin
Finance Director
Date: September 4, 1990
Subject :Proposed 1991 Fees an
Charges
Agenda Item # �. c
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
7
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
Discussion
Recommendation:
Review schedule of proposed 1991 fees and charges
Info /Background:
Attached is the schedule of proposed 1991 fees and charges.
The schedule compares the proposed fees and projected number
of permits for 1991 with those for 1990. The BOLD print
under the NO. OF P&RMITS and FEE columns reflects changes in
the projected number of permits and proposed fees
compared with those for 1990.
1
CITY OF EDINA
FEES AND CHARGES
FEE NO.
FEES
NO. OF
1990
NO. OF
1991
PERMITS
FEE REVENUE
PERMITS
FEE
REVENUE
FIRE
SPRINKLER PERMIT:
22.1a -22.1e
SPRINKLER PERMIT
300
40-300
300
40-300
22.1f
FIRE PUMP INSTALL
75
75
22.1g -22.1h
STAND PIPE INSTALL
75
22,000
75
22,000
GAS PUMP, TANK & BURN:
21 -21b
SPECIAL HAZARD
200
25-100
35
25-100
50
GREASE VENT
75
35
65
35
FIRE ALARM SYST
30
40- 300
30
40-300
22
FIRE EXT SERV
25
15
3,000
20
15
4,500
_La
FALSE ALARMS
30
175
5.000
11
175
1000
AMBULANCE
LEVEL I
1400
60
1500
60
LEVEL II
255
260
LEVEL III
305
310
LEVEL IV
355
360
LEVEL V
405
375.000
410
425.000
CODE COMPLIANCE
40
75
SEE ALL OTHER FIRE
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
ENGIN CO
150/HR
HAZMAT UNIT
300
PERSONNEL
PAY RATE
EQUIP & SUPPLIES
AT COST
3.000
ASSESSING
SPEC. ASSESSMENT SEARC
1300
10
13.000
500
10
5.000
PLANNING
CITY OF EDINA
FEES AND CHARGES
FEE NO. FEES NO. OF 1990 NO. OF
PERMITS FEE REVENUE PERMITS
19a SIGN PERMIT 110 50 5.500 110
1991
FEE REVENUE
55 6,000
POLICE
PLANNING FEES:
28b
SUBDIVISION
7
225 + $5/LOT
7
250 + $10/LOT
29b-d
REZONING
3
300 -600
3
300-600
29e
WAREHOUSE SALE
4
300
4
300
29f
COND USE PERMIT
1
500
1
500
29g
FINAL DEVL PLAN
5
350
5
350
28a
LOT DIVISION
7
30
7
30
28c
DEVELOPER FEE/PLAN A
59
10
59
63% TOTAL COST
29a -29a.1
VARIANCE
40
75-150
40
75-150
29f.1
LANDSCAPING
10
100
10
100
31
VACATION APPLICATION
6
100 13.000
6
100
NEW
COMPLIANCE LETTERS
20
35
50
50
POLICE
11,00(
12,000
37,000
BOWLING. TAXI & PINBALL•
1
PUBLIC DANCE
4
35
4
35
2a -2b
BOWLING ALLEY LIC
2
35 + $10/1.ANE
2
35 + $lO/LANE
3
KART TRACK LICENSE
0
51KART OR 40
0
5/KART OR 40
4
BINTGO &- GAMBLING
A.
35
5
10
5a -5b
MECH AMUSE DEVICE
81
5-35
32
5.40
6 THEATRE LICENSE
3
100
3
125
19b
BENCH COURTESY SIGNS
59
10
59
12
36.5
LOUDSPEAKER PERMIT
15
5
18
6
40
PARKING PERMIT
N/A
2/MONTH
NIA
3/MONTH
40a
REFUND ON STICKER
N/A
2/MONTH .
NIA
31MONTH
43
SOLICITOR
20
35
20
40
44a
MOTOR BIKE LICENSE
N/A
50
NIA
50
44b
RENTING MOTOR BIKE
N/A
100
N/A
100
46
TAXI DRIVER
0
35
0
40
47a '
BUSINESS MASSAGE LICE.
0
200
0
200
47b
INDIV. MASSAGE LICENS
6
50
6
55
"?c
INDIV. FEE -INDIV. LIC.
2
50
2
55
/d
INDIV. FEE- BUSINESS LIC
0
1.500
0
1,500
49
TAXICAB
100
35
12,000 130
40
48
FALSE ALARM
480
75
36.000 480
75
11,00(
12,000
37,000
CITY OF EDINA
FEES AND CHARGES
FEE NO.
FEES
NO. OF
1990
NO. OF
1991
BEER & LIQUOR:
PERMITS
FEE
REVENUE PERMITS
FEE REVENUE
36a
DOG & IM[POUNDING FEES:
2
200
2
200
36b
IMPOUNDING:
2
650
2
650
7a
DAILY CARE
100
7
100
12
7b
FIRST OFFENSE/YR
140
25
140
30
7c
SECOND OFFENS/YR
4
50
4
55
7d
THIRD OFFENSE/YR
1
100
1
105
7e
DISPOSAL
8
10
8
15
7f
DOG LICENSE
100
20
100
25
7f
NEUTERED LICENSE
300
7
300
12
7g
DUPLICATE LICENSE
10
1
10
6
7h
KENNEL LICENSE
0
50
0
55
36g
DOG LICENSE RENEWAL
50
6
50
11
36h
DOG LICENSE RENEW S/
150
3
10,000 150
8 12,000
CITY CLERK
BEER & LIQUOR:
36a
SUNDAY LIQUOR LICENS
2
200
2
200
36b
ON-SALE LIQUOR
2
650
2
650
36c
ON-SALE BEER RENWL
18
175
16
180
36c -1
ON -SALE BEER NEW
0
230
2
235
36d
OFF -SALE BEER RENW
6
175
5
180
36d -1
OFF -SALE BEER NEW
0
230
1
235
36f
TEMP LIQUOR LICENSE
1
35
1
35
ON-SALE WIVE:
36g
50 OR < SEATS
0
600
0
610
36g
51 -100 SEATS
2
650
3
660
36g
101 -150 SEATS
4
700
4
710
36g
OVER 150 SEATS
2
750
3
760
36h
MANAGERS LICENSE
32
55 16,000
34
55 16,000
HEALTH
POOL & SPA:
17a
INDOOR SWIM POOL
30
250
30
260
17b
OUTDOOR SWIM POOL
25
135
26
140
18
WHIRLPOOL
10
55 11,000
11
60 12,100
FEE NO.
23
24a
24b
24c
25a
2531
25x2
25a3
25a4
-,c
25d
25e
25f
25g
25h
25i
25j
25k
25k
251
251 -1
26
27a
27a
27b
41
42a
CITY OF EDINA
FEES AND CHARGES
FEES NO. OF 1990 NO. OF 1991
PERMITS FEE REVENUE PERMITS FEE
FOOD & SOFT DRINKS
SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYS.
MILK PLANT OPERATION
MILK PRODUCTION & DISTR:
EACH TRUCK
> FIVE TRUCKS
FOOD ESTABLISHMENT
ADDED FACILITY
TAKE OUT FOOD
PACKAGED FOOD
FOOD WHAREHOUSE
CATERING FOOD EST
ADDED FACILITY
ITINERANT FOOD EST
RETAIL CANDY SHOP
READY PERISH FOOD
FLEET OF 5 OR MORE
BAKERY VEHICLE
CATERING VEHICLE
ADDED VEHICLE
PARISHABLE FOOD
FLEET OF 5 OR MORE
FOOD VENDING MACH
ICE VENDING MACH
PKG ICE
FOOD EST PLAN
FOOD EST PLAN REMO
FUMIGATING PERMIT
HOTEL LICENSE
50 OR < ROOMS
OVER 50 ROOMS
LODGING LICENSE
SCAVENGER & GARBAGE
COLLECTORS:
GARBAGE HAULER
ADDED VEHICLE
SCAVENGER LIC
RENEWAL
0
25
0
25
0
100
0
100
0
10
0
10
0
50
0
50
75
345
80
360
5
85
5
90
5
230
7
240.
4
110
4
11S
2
50
2
SS
3
345
4
360
0
85
0
90
20
50
25
SS
10
35
10
40
20
55
20
60
0
275
0
300
0
50
0
50
0
130
0
140
0
15
0
20
5
55
5
60
0
275
0
300
500
15
400
15
0
10
0
10
2
20
2
20
3
100% LICNS FEE
S
1W% LICNS FEE
5
50 % LICNS FEE
10
50% LICNS FEE
0
12
0
12
0
150
1
150
0
$1/ ADDED ROOM
0
$1/ ADDED ROOM
0
- 55 41.000
0
55
15
75
15
100
20
30
20
35
0
25
0
25
0
15
0
15
42,400
CITY OF EDINA
FEES AND CHARGES
FEE NO.
FEES
NO. OF
19%
NO.OF
1991
PERNIITS
FEE REVENUE
PERMITS
FEE REVENUE
42b
SCAVENGER PERMIT
5
20 1.800
5
20 2.300
45a45b
VENDING
85
12 1.500
50
12 600
CESSPOOL & SEWER
0
20 500
20
20 400,
BUILDING
BUILDING PERMITS
9a -9i
BUILDING PERMITS
900
STATE CODE 450.000
900
STATE CODE 482.750
10
CODE COMPLIANCE INSP
0
60AHR
.0
60AHR
lla
MOVING OF BLDGS.
0
50
0
50
l lb
INDEMNITIY FOR DAMAG
0
500
0
500
INSTALLER'S LICENSE
0
25
0
2c
A
GASFITTING LICENSE
0
25
0
25
13b
WATER COND. INSTAL
0
25
0
25
20
CONSTRUCT /ALTER WEL
0
25
0
25
30
RADIO & TV ANTENNAS
0
BLDG PERMIT AMT
0
BLDG PERMIT AMT
31
STREET EXCAVATION
0
75
0
75
33
PRIVATE EXCAVATION
0
50
0
50
34
MINIINGIS"TRIPPING
0
50
0
50
PLUMBING:
14a
EACH FIX LURE
1,400
10
1,400
11
14b
ROUGH -IN FIXTURE
8
8
14c
'SETTING FIXTURES
8
8
14d
BEER DISPENSER
8
8
14e
BLOW OFF BASIN
11
11
14f
CATCH BASIN
11
11
14g
ELEC WATER HEATER
11
11
14h
HYDRAULIC VALVE
11
11
14i
MANHOLES
11
11
14j
NEW GROUND RUN
11
11
Ak
ROOF DRAINS
11
11
It
SUMP TANK
11
11
14m
WATER SOFTENER
11
11
14n
EXTEND WATER LINES
12
12
14p
SEWER
20
20
14q
WATER
20
20
FEE NO.
FEES
14r
INSTALL WATER M I R
TAPS:
14s
314"
14t
1"
14t1
INSTALL RPZ BACKFLOW
142
INSPECT RPZ
ROAD REPAIR:
14v
BLACKTOP
14w
CONCRETE
GAS:
14v
UP TO 2"
14y -1
ADDED TO 2"
14z
OVER 2"
14z -1
ADDED OVER 2"
4 a
GAS STOVE
tab-14ab1
HOT WATER HEATER
14ac
GAS LIGHT
14ad
GAS BARBECUE
14ae
INCINERATOR
14af
MINIMUM PERMIT FEE
HEATING, VENTR ATION &
MECHANICAL•
MINIMUM FEE:
SINGLE FAMILY
COMMERCIAL
FEE CALCULATION:
$0-$500
$501- $1,000
$1,001- $5,000
$5,001- $10,000
$10,000 - $25.000
$25,001- $50,000
$50,001 & OVER
NO. OF
PERMITS
11
CITY OF EDINA
FEES AND CHARGES
1990
FEE
20
125
125
11
Y
12
120
120
15
3
20
3
11
11
11
11
15
15
15
20
NO. OF
REVENUE PERMITS
2.75% OF
CONTRACT PRICE
$13.75+
2.5% > $500
$26.25+
2.25% > $1.000
$116.25+
2% > $5.000
$216.25 + 1.75%
> $10,000
$478.75 + 1.5%
> $25,000
$853.75 + 1.25%
55,000
LUZ
1991
FEE
20
125
125
12 Y
12
120
120
15
3.
20
3
11
11
11
11
15
15
15
20
2.75% OF .
CONTRACT PRICE
$13.75+
2.5% > $500
$26.25+
2.25% > $1.000
$116.25+
2% > $5,000
$216.25 + 1.75%
> $10,000
$478.75 + 1.5%
> $25,000
$853.75 + 1.25%
60,000
FEE NO.
CITY OF EDINA
FEES AND CHARGES
FEES NO. OF 1990 NO. OF
PERMITS FEE REVENUE PERMITS
> $50,000
65,000
PARK AND RECREATION
REGISTRATION FEE:
150,000
MUNICIPAL COURT FINES
515,000
PLAYGROUND
460
9
460
AQUATIC INSTR
800
30
800
T -BALL
491
22
490
TENNIS INSTR
430
25
430
FIELD USE FEE
4,700
5
4700
PEEWEE TENNIS
60
TEAM TENNIS
70,000 25
TREE REMOVAL
OTHER CHARGES
ENGINEERING & CLERICAL
150,000
MUNICIPAL COURT FINES
515,000
CHARGES TO OTHER FUNDS
105,000
CONTRIBUTION FROM LIQUOR FUND
350,000
SALES & RENTAL PROPERTY
22,000
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
20,000
INCOME ON INVESTMENTS
80,000
LABORATORY FEES
3,000
DONATIONS
500
SERVICES HRA
145,000
OTHER
2,000
TOTAL FEES & CHARGES $2,598,800
1991
FEE
> $50,000
10
30
22
25
5
15
25
FEE NO.
37a
37a
37b
37c
37d
38f
39c
`b
./a
39d
39f
39g
39i
CITY OF EDINA
FEES AND CHARGES
FEES NO. OF 1990 NO. OF 1991
PERMITS FEE REVENUE PERMITS FEE REVENUE
UTILITIES
SEWER RENTAL CHARGE
SGL FAM. < 1600 CU FT
> 1600 CU FT
4-UNTT APTS
COMM & IND BLDGS
IND USER SEWER STRENGTH
SAC
WATER SERVICE:
EAST OF BEARD AV
MORNINGSIDE AREA
ALL OTHER AREAS
LESS THAN 1600 CU FT
FIAT WATER CHARGE:
PARK DEPT/SPRINKiSKATE
ST DEPTTLUSH
CURB WATER STOPS
20.50 /QTR
1.30/100 CU FT
84.50 +15.50 > 4
OR 1.30/100 CU FT
21/WATER METER OR
1.30 /CU FT
600
1.10 /100 CU FT
1.10 /100 CU FT
.42/100 CU FT
6.60 /QTR
2,500
1,000
12.50/EA
2L60 /QTR
135/100 CU FT
8830 +16.20 > 4
OR 135/100 CU FT
221WATER NEETER OR
135 1100 CU FT
650
1.10 /100 CU FT
1.10 /100 CU FT
A4 1100 CU FT
7.04 /QTR
2,500
1,000
12.50/EA
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
09 -04
-90 PAGE 1
CHECK NO.
- HE66
DATE
6$,'2-4,'9&
AMOUNT
46.85
VENDOR
69NG
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
'8
# MESSAGE
6AKE F9R9 TRACT
Eft €DIT
4548 560 56 -88852
* * *k*
46.85
* * * -CKS
247700
08/21/90
498.75
NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS
STOP SIGN
10- 4542 - 325 -30
29084
8641
498.75
*
247701
08/21/90
403.71
DRUMMOND AM CORP
WEED KILLER
10- 4504 - 365 -30
8709
403.71
*
247702
08/21/90
182.00
AM EXCELSIOR CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 301 -30
171904
8677
182.00
*
247703
08/21/90
6.95
BOYER TRUCK PARTS
SEAL
10- 4540- 560 -56
856219
8952
247703
08/24/90
19.43
BOYER TRUCK PARTS
CABLE
10- 4540 - 560 -56
9207
26.38
*
247704
08/21/90
12.00
ASSO FOR RETARDED
DUES
10- 4204 - 600 -60
6022
12.00
*
247705
08/21/90
14.25
MOTORTRONICS INC
MOTOR BOARD
40- 4540 - 801 -80
6180
5521
14.25
*
247706
08/21/90
245.52
VINCE COCKRIEL
SCHOOL
10- 4202 - 640 -64
245.52
*
247707
08/21/90
289.00
ARLENE M SAVORY
AMBULANCE REFUND
10- 3180 - 000 -00
289.00
247708
08/21/90
22,911.18
WH CATES CONSTR
CONSTRUCTION
60- 1300 - 015 -20
22,911.18
247709
08/21/90
191.59
MICHAUD COOLEY
CONSULTING SERVICE
30- 4201 - 782 -78
22986
8136
191.59
247710
08/21/90
13.52
BECKIE ROGERS
SERVICES
10- 4206 - 140 -14
13.52
247711
08/21/90
135.00
FRANK MUSIL
LESSONS
30- 4201 - 781 -78
135.00
247712
08/21/90
50.00
SUE BLUMBERG
PERFORMANCE 9/27/90
30- 4224 - 781 -78
50.00
247713
08/21/90
50.00
SUE BLUMBERG
PERFORMANCE-9/6/90
30- 4224 - 781 -78
50.00
*
UNITED ARTS
247714
08/21/90
40.00
UNITED ARTEST
CONFERENCE
30- 4202 - 781 -78
40.00
*
247715
08/21/90
320.69
RESPOND SYSTEMS
RESPIRATORS
26- 4642 - 681 -68
9286
8751
247715
08/21/90
230.47
RESPOND SYSTEMS
RESPIRATORS.
30- 4642 - 781 -78
9286
8751
247715
08/21/90
704.36
RESPOND SYSTEMS
RESPIRATORS
40- 4642 - 803 -80
9286
8751
1,255.52
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
247716
08,21/90
14.00
KEVIN BAGLEY
REFUND
14.00
*
247717
08/21/90
75.00
ROBERT BURTIS
SERVICES 10/11/90
75.00
*
247718
08/21/90
40.00
DIE,BAVARIAN
SERVICES 10/11/90
40.00
*
247719
08/21/90
75.00
VALERIE WEBER
SERVICES 10/21/90
75.00
*
- 247720
08/21/90
50.00
KENWOOD CHAMBER,
SERVICES 10/21/90
50.00
247721
08/21/90
75.00
THE ROADRUNNERS
SERVICES 10/25/90
75.00
*
247722
08/21/90
11,750.00
GOPHER STATE
TENNIS COURT REPAIR
11,750.00
*
247723
08/23/90
175.25
FINLEY BROS ENT
REPAIR FENCE
* * * * **
175.25
*
247725
08/23/90
16.00
CRISTINA GOLDARORENA
REFUND
16.00
247726
08/23/90
8.00
MN VIKING FOOD
REFUND
8.00
`'`247727
08/23/90
95.00
HAGA PHOTO
COUNCIL PICTURES
247727
08/23/90
167.00
HAGA PHOTO
COUNCIL PICTURES
262.00
247728
08/23/90
252.00
ECI BLDG CONTRACT
REPAIR ROOF
252.00
247729
08/23/90
481.50
BUDGET LIGHTING INC
LIGHTS
481.50
*
247730
08/23/90
158.76
DUBOIS CHEMICAL INC
H2O TREATMENT
158.76
*
247731
08/23/90
43.41
DR J CHRISTENSEN
WATER REFUND
43.41
*
247732
.08/23/90
61.20
MARCIA LEE
WATER REFUND
61.20
*
247733
08/23/90
47.45
JAMES WITTMAN
WATER REFUND
47.45
*
<.247734
08/23/90
64.62
KUNZ OIL
WATER REFUND
i
09 -04 -90 PAGE 2
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 1145 - 000 -00
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
60- 1300 - 022 -20 1916 8565
10- 4201 - 647 -64 7093 9465
10- 3500 - 000 -00
10- 3045 - 000 -00
10- 4504 - 100 -10 831010 9439
10- 4504 - 100 -10 931012 9439
28- 4248 - 702 -70 3014 9393
28- 4504 - 702 -70 15262 9119
28- 4504 - 702 -70 9117
40- 3800 - 000 -00
40- 3800 - 000 -00
40- 3800 - 000 -00
40- 3800 - 000 -00
* * * -CKS
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
08/23/90
08/23/90
08/23/90
08/23/90
08/23/90
08/23/90
08/23/90
08/23/90
08/23/90
08/23/90
08/23/90
08/23/90
08/23/90
08/23/90
08/23/90
08/24/90
08/23/90
08/23/90
08/23/90
AMOUNT
64.62
*
61.76
61.76
*
41.21
41.21
*
32.10
32.10
*
32.10
32.10
*
32.10
32.10
*
10.08
10.08
*
43.25
43.25
*
90.00
90.00
*
115.16
115.16
*
2,620.00
4,193.04
6,813.04
*
53.86
53.86 *
184.00
184.00 *
32.33
32.33 *
200.00
200.00 *
70.00
120.00
190.00 *
49.95
49.95 *
77.81
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
JAMES FOSTER
JIM HUGHES
MICHAEL FARLEY
LLOYD KING
MOLLY ANNE BAKER
ALEX BLEAHU
DORIS MELROSE
ART CENTER OF MN
DAVID GOBLISCH
B &F DIST INC
B &F DIST INC
FREDA S AYRE
WORKD CLASS WINE
ABP MIDWEST INC
DAVID E KNEFELKAMP
EDINA TOWING SERVICE
EDINA TOWING SERVICE
DAYLE MCINTOSH CTR
KUSTOM SIGNALS INC
WATER REFUND
WATER REFUND
WATER REFUND
WATER REFUND
WATER REFUND
WATER REFUND
WATER REFUND
CRAFT SUPPLIES
REPAIRS
GAS
GAS
AMBULANCE REFUND
MISC
MEETING EXPENSES
PRO SERVICES
MILEAGE
MILEAGE
VHS TAPES
EQUIP REPLACE
09 -04 -90 PAGE 3
ACCOUNT N0. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
40- 3800 - 000 -00
40- 3800 - 000 -00
40- 3800 - 000 -00
40- 3800 - 000 -00
40- 3800 - 000 -00
40- 3800 - 000 -00
40- 3800 - 000 -00
23- 4588 - 611 -61
60- 1300 - 283 -04
10- 4612 - 560 -56
10- 4612 - 560 -56 28522
10- 3180 - 000 -00
50- 4628 - 862 -86
10 -4206- 420 -42 531946
10- 4201 - 420 -42
10- 4208 - 420 -42
10- 4208 - 420 -42
10- 4202 - 420 -42
10-4901- 420-42 139558
* * * -CKS
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
247753
247754
247755
247755
247756
247756
247756
247756
247756
247757
247758
247758
247759
247760
247761
247762
247762
.247762
247762
247763
247764
247765
247766
247767
4
08/23/90
08/24/90
08/28/90
08/24/90
08/24/90
08/24/90
08/27/90
08/24/90
08/24/90
08/24/90
08/24/90
08/24/90
08/24/90
08/24/90
08/24/90
08/27/90
08/27/90
08/27/90
08/27/90
08/27/90
08/27/90
08/27/90
08/27/90
08/27/90
AMOUNT
77.81 *
52.01
52.01 *
28.00
28.00 *
1,119.00
675.00
1,794.00 *
15.14
70.76
229.83
219.63
207.42
742.78 *
160.65
160.65 *
75.00
151.80
226.80 *
199.80
199.80 *
2,775.00
2,775.00 *
31.78
31.78 *
17,100.00
7,650.20
17,100.00-
1,710.00
9,360.20 *
23.65
23.65 *
327.94
327.94 *
815.00
815.00 *
450.00
450.00 *
280.00
280.00 *
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
HECKLER & KOCH INC
KEN SEVERUD
CURT KRIENS CONSTR
CURT KRIENS CONSTR
KRAFT FOOD SERVICE
KRAFT FOOD SERVICE
KRAFT FOOD SERVICE
KRAFT FOOD SERVICE
KRAFT FOOD SERVICE
HOFFERS INC
THE GLIDDEN CO
THE GLIDDEN CO
STREMEL HRW CO
TOODS TREE SERV
THEODORE PAULFRANZ
KATH
KATH
KATH
KATH
SCHARBER /SONS INC
EILEEN COOKE
KEY DESIGN
NATL REC /PKS ASSN
GOLD OAK TREE SERV
AMMUNITION
PLAQUES
SEAL SIDEWALKS
RAILINGS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
FOOD /RESALE
CONCESSIONS
CONCESSIONS
GLASS REPAIR
PAINT
PAINT
PICK HANDLES
TREE REMOVAL
AMBULANCE REFUND
FUEL
FUEL
FUEL
FUEL
REPAIR PARTS
CONFERENCE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CONFERENCE
REMOVE DISEASED TREE
09 -04 -90 PAGE 4
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4572 - 420 -42
27- 4600 - 661 -66 7386 9480
27- 4248 - 664 -66
9001
27- 4540 - 666 -66
8924
27- 4504 - 663 -66
8069
27- 4512- 663 -66
8069
27- 4624 - 663 -66
443976 8069
27- 4624 - 663 -66
8069
27- 4624 - 663 -66
8069
10- 4540 - 540 -54
163303 9217
10- 4504 - 322 -30
9214
10- 4504- 322 -30
8576
40- 4580 - 801 -80
E35484 7819
27- 4288 - 664 -66
9102
10- 4504 - 440 -44
10- 4612- 560 -56
9409
10- 4612- 560 -56
9409
10- 4612- 560 -56
9409
10- 4612 - 560 -56
9409
27- 4540 - 666 -66
10- 4202 - 480 -48
30- 4504 - 783 -78 9163
10- 4202 - 600 -60
10- 1300 - 091 -23
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
09 -04 -90 PAGE
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
247768
08/27/90
280.00
FOUR SEASONS
REMOVE DISEASED TREE
10 -1300- 091 -23
280.00
*
247769
08/27/90
90.00
PATRICIA BENSON
CLEANING
27- 4201 - 662 -66
30597 9312
90.00
*
247770
08/27/90
47.75
SOUTHAM BUSINESS
PRESS SERVICE
30- 4214 - 781 -78
9553
47.75
*
247771
08/28/90
159.00
LIA NICKLOS
AC INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201 - 611 -61
159.00
*
247772
08/28/90
36.00
BETSY BRYANT
AC INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201 - 611 -61
247772
08/28/90
131.12
BETSY BRYANT
AC SUPPLIES
23- 4588-612 -61
167.12
*
247773
08/28/90
225.00
PAT GEISHEKER
ART WORK SOLD
23- 3625 - 000 -00
225.00
*
247774
08/28/90
68.00
KATHRYN BENNETT
JURIED SHOW ACCT
23- 3265 - 000 -00
68.00
*
247775
08/28/90
180.00
JEY CARLSON
AC INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201 - 611 -61
180.00
*
247776
08/28/90
16.00
HOLLY BLUM
CLASS REFUND
23- 3500 - 000 -00
16.00
247777
08/28/90
16.00
JENNIFER BACH
CLASS REFUND
23- 3500 - 000 -00
16.00
*
247778
08/28/90
38.00
LARK MACPHAIL
CLASS REFUND
23- 3500 - 000 -00
38.00
*
247779
08/28/90
42.00
AMANDA COYNE
CLASS REFUND
23- 3500 - 000 -00
42.00
*
247780
08/28/90
26.00
BARBARA HOLIN
CLASS REFUND
23- 3500 - 000 -00
26.00
*
247781
08/28/90
16,800.00
CSI ELECTRIC
CONSTRUCTION
60- 1300 - 016 -20
C436 8812
16,800.00
*
247782
08/28/90
1,237.00
IMPULSE CONCEPTS
REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 646 -64
2780 -0 9339
1,237.00
247783
08/28/90
800.00
PROSPECT DRILL /SAW
CONSTRUCTION
10- 4201 - 500 -50
013414 9340
800.00
.247784
08/28/90
1,400.00
E &K ELECTRIC
ELETRIC WIRE
10- 4201 - 500 -50
3005 9341
1,400.00
247785
08/28/90
3,920.00
MSE
WELL POND HARVEST
10- 4200 - 358 -30
7571
3,920.00
5
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
247786
08f28/90
18.00
DON R FREY /CO
DEMO
18.00
*
247787
08/28/90
178.39
AM FUNDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
178.39
*
247788
08/28/90
14.16
VFW POST #3915
ADVERTISING
247788
08/28/90
14.16
VFW POST #3915
ADVERTISING
247788
08/28/90
14.18
VFW POST #3915
ADVERTISING
42.50
*
247789
08/28/90
53.73
METROPOLITAN
SIGN FRAME
53.73
*
247790
08/28/90
100.00
SEMINAR HENN CO
TRAINING
100.00
*
247791
08/28/90
135.00
IACP
TRAINING
135.00
*
247792
08/28/90
34.95
CSI
EQUIP MAINT
34.95
*
247793
08/28/90
60.00
MUSEUM SERVICE
CONT REPAIRS
60.00
*
247794
08/28/90
819.00
LANDSCAPE PRODUCT
ROCK
247794
08/28/90
30.00
LANDSCAPE PRODUCT
BARK
247794
08/28/90
484.36
LANDSCAPE PRODUCT
PLANTINGS
247794
08/28/90
457.60
LANDSCAPE PRODUCT
PLANTINGS
247794
08/28/90
1,925.00
LANDSCAPE PRODUCT
PLANTINGS
247794
08/28/90
790.50
LANDSCAPE PRODUCT
SHRUBS /PLANTINGS
4,506.46
*
247795
08/28/90
53.60
MIDWEST VENDING WHSL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
247795
08/28/90
20.80
MIDWEST VENDING WHSL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
247795
08/28/90
64.80
MIDWEST VENDING WHSL
CONCESSIONS
139.20
*
247796
08/28/90
135.00
CONSTRUCTION
GENERAL SUPPLIES
135.00
*
247797
08/28/90
63.75
COMMERCIAL FURNITURE
CHAIR REPAIR
63.75
*
247798
08/28/90
7,947.20
PERKINS LANDSCAPE
CONSTRUCTION
247798
08/28/90
4,356.00
PERKINS LANDSCAPE
GRADING GROUND
12,303.20
*
247799
08/28/90
3,260.00
LE KOLLMEYER ARCHT
CONSTRUCTION
*x * *xx
3,260.00
*
247A09
08/21/90
2,270.60
AAA
LICENSE EXP
09 -04 -90 PAGE
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4504 - 160 -16 3452 9304
10- 4504 - 510 -51 105185 9307
50- 4214 - 822 -82
50- 4214 - 842 -84
50- 4214 - 862 -86
50- 4248 - 841 -84 8639
10- 4202 - 420 -42
10- 4202 - 420 -42
10- 4274 - 420 -42 28541 9395
27- 4248 - 662 -66 2991 9303
27- 4522 - 664 -66 9090
27- 4560 - 664 -66 8669
27- 4560- 664 -66 9011
27- 4560 - 664 -66 8815
27- 4560- 664 -66 9336
27- 4560 - 664 -66 8844
27- 4504 - 663 -66 9490
27- 4504 - 663 -66 9490
27- 4624 - 663 -66 9490
10- 4504 - 440 -44 077816 9186
10- 4248 - 440 -44 25720 8851
27 -1300- 004 -00 9110
27- 4306 - 664 -66 7575
60- 1300 - 020 -20
10- 4310 - 560 -56
6
* * * -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
* ** -CKS
CHECK REGISTER
672821
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
65520
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
247A09
08/21/90
5.50
* ** -CKS
AAA
TITLE ONLY
n * * * n *
2.276.10.*
55556
9325
* ** -CKS
247A21
08/24/90
195.71
* ** -CKS
ADT SECURITY SYS.
ALARM SERVICE
n* k k k n
195.71
12007
9130
* ** -CKS
247A29
03/21/90
408.00
ALBINSON
PAPER /PENS
* * * k * *
* ** -CKS
408.00
*
247A33
08/21/90
1,776.20
AEC ENG /DESIGNERS
PRO ENG SERV
k * * R k *
1,776.20
*
247A39
08/24/90
4.21
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
SPRAY PRIMER
247A39
08/24/90
158.00
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
REPAIR
247A39
08/24/90
44.80
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
STARTER MOTOR
247A39
08/24/90
218.54
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
LADDER
425.55
*
247A41
08/24/90
579.41
AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE
FOOD
247A41
08/24/90
198.60
AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE
FOOD
* * k n t n
778.01
*
247A43
08/27/90
30.00
AM LASER CUT GRAFIX
SIGN PAINTING
247A43
08/27/90
236.69
AM LASER CUT GRAFIX
SIGN
* * * k k *
266.69
247A45
08/23/90
40.26
AMER. PHOTO COPY -
GENERAL SUPPLIES
247A45
08/23/90
281.00
AMER. PHOTO COPY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
* R k * k *
321.26
247A53
08/23/90
104.14
AMERICAN SHARECOM
TELEPHONE
* * * * **
104.14
*
247A80
08/21/90
225.12
ASTLEFORD INTL
SWITCH
247A80
08/21/90
19.18
ASTLEFORD INTL
SWITCH
244.30
*
09 -04 -90 PAGE 7
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4310 - 560 -56
* ** -CKS
30- 4304 - 782 -78
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
10- 4570 - 260 -26
672821
5352
30- 4504 - 782 -78
65520
9504
* ** -CKS
40- 4201 - 800 -80
2958
10- 4504 - 420 -42
55556
9325
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 301 -30
7062
9131
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
12012
8154
10- 4540 - 560 -56
12007
9130
* ** -CKS
10- 4580 - 301 -30
7064
9182
10- 4540- 560 -56
A65784
8615
* ** -CKS
27- 4624 - 663 -66
5506
27- 4624 - 663 -66
5506
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS.
30- 4504 - 782 -78
65519
9505
30- 4504 - 782 -78
65520
9504
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 420 -42
F41418
10- 4504 - 420 -42
55556
9325
* ** -CKS
10- 4256 - 510 -51
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
A65873
9135
10- 4540- 560 -56
A65784
8615
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
247A91
08,621/90
* * * * *x
247A96
08/21/90
* **xxx
247B02
08/21/90
247B02
08/24/90
247BG5
08/23/90
247B05
08/28/90
* k x * * x
247607
08/21/90
* * *xxx
247B18
08/21/90
247B18
08/21/90
247818
08/21/90
247B18
08/24/90
247818
08/21/90
247618
08/21/90
247618
x * *xx*
08/24/90
AMOUNT
08/28/90
60.90
60.90
*
33.50
33.50
*
300.00
65.75
08/28/90
365.75
*
168.00
08/28/90
40.00
208.00
*
2,073.20
2,073.20
*
170.88 -
170.88-
53.00
260.70
249.64
170.88
124.82
517.28
247B27
08/28/90
88.50
247827
08/28/90
260.00
247827
08/28/90
198.00
247B27
08/28/90
433.00
247627
08/28/90
127.50
247627
08/28/90 486.50
- 486.86-
1,593.50
247B30
08/24/90
38.56
247830
08/24/90
22.64
247B30
08/21/90
13.34
247630
08/24/90
40.44
247630
08/23/90
14.60
247630
08/21/90
76.80
247630
08/23/90
66.40
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
AUTO SOUND /ENTRONIX REPAIRS
AUTOMOBILE SERV CTR
BFI PORTABLE SERV
BFI PORTABLE SERV
BACH -BILL
BACH -BILL
BADGER METER INC
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
BERGFORD TRUCKING
BERGFORD TRUCKING
BERGFORD TRUCKING
BERGFORD TRUCKING
BERGFORD TRUCKING
BERGFORD TRUCKING
BERTELSON BROS INC
BERTELSON BROS. INC
BERTELSON BROS. INC
BERTELSON BROS. INC
BERTELSON BROS. INC
BERTELSON BROS. INC
BERTELSON BROS. INC
ALIGNMENT
RENTAL
SATELLITE
REIMBURSEMENT
GENERA SUPPLIES
WATER METERS
CREDIT
CREDIT
TIE DOWM STRAP
BRAKES
BATTERY
CREDIT
BATTERY
LIQUOR DELIVERY
LIQUOR DELIVERY
LIQUOR DELIVERY
LIQUOR DELIVERY
LIQUOR DELIVERY
LIQUOR DELIVERY
BINDERS
FILE BOXES
PENS
BINDERS /TAPE
MARKERS /WALLET
DISKETTES
FOLDERS
09 -04 -90 PAGE 8
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4248 - 560 -56 9139
10- 4248 - 560 -56 2833 9037
10- 4250 - 645 -64
27- 4288 - 664 -66
30- 4202 - 781 -78
30- 4504 - 783 -78
40- 1220 - 000 -00 638614 5189
10- 4540 - 560 -56
10 -4540- 560 -56
10- 4540- 560 -56
10- 4540 - 560 -56
10- 4540 - 560 -56
10- 4540 - 560 -56
10- 4540 - 560 -56
50- 4626 - 822 -82
50- 4626 - 822 -82
50- 4626 - 842 -84
50- 4626 - 842 -84
50- 4626 - 862 -86
50- 4626- 862 -86
37611
37611
36784 8777
38345 9211
37558 8894
37611
38566 9212
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 160 -16 * ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 140 -14 594705
10- 4504 - 140 -14 592901
10- 4504 - 160 -16 594705
10- 4504 - 160 -16 589308
10- 4504 - 160 -16 592036
10- 4504- 260 -26 589308
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
247630
08/24/90
247630
08/28/90
247830
08/23/90
247830
08/23/90
247B30
08/23/90
247B30
08/24/90
247830
08/21/90
247830
08/21/90
247830
08/21/90
247630
08/21/90
* * * * **
247B32
08/21/90
247632
08/21/90
* * * * **
247642
08/24/90
247B42
08/21/90
247B42
08/28/90
* ** * **
247878
08/28/90
247879
08/24/90
247B79
08/21/90
* * * * **
247681
08/21/90
247682
08/21/90
247682
08/28/90
* * * * **
247B91 08/21/90
* * * * **
247893 08/27/90
247C17 08/21/90
AMOUNT
8.00
BROS.
43.65
SHEET PROTECTORS
15.84
BROS.
136.32
GENERAL
117.50
BERTELSON
184.89
INC.
- 30.40
10- 4504 - 314 -30
77.76
BROS.
28.10
LABELS
21.60
BERTELSON
-998.28
936.84*
FOLDERS
6.13
20.00
26.13 *
28.49
19.98
251.88
300.35 *
2.56
2.56 *
174.00
214.50
388.50 *
98.50
98.50 *
30.04
26.16
56.20 *
15.00
15.00 *
5.91
5.91 *
95.99
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
SHEET PROTECTORS
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
LABELS
10- 4504 - 314 -30
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
LABELS
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
FOLDERS
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
PRINTER
STAND
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
CHAIR
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
OFFICE
SUPPLIES
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
OFFICE
SUPPLIES
BEST LOCK OF MPLS
BEST LOCK OF MPLS
BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY
BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY
BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY
BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC
BROCK WHITE
BROCK WHITE
BRW INC.
BRUNSON INSTRUMENT
BRUNSON INSTRUMENT
BURY & CARLSON INC
BRC ELECT /MIDWEST
CDP
KEYS
LOCK PARTS
PHOTO FINISHING
PHOTO PROCESSING
GEN SUP /AC
VLECRO
VULKEN GREY TUBE
PAIL
09 -04 -90 PAGE 9
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4504 - 420 -42
10- 4504 - 420 -42
10- 4504 - 490 -49
10- 4504 - 510 -51
10- 4504 - 510 -51
10- 4504 - 510 -51
10- 4516 - 440 -44
26- 4504 - 683 -68
30- 4516 - 781 -78
30- 4516- 781 -78
594705
594706
589308
589459
589308
594705
592901
591081
591731 9114
9114
10- 4504 - 646 -64 7007
10- 4540 - 520 -52 6836 8908
10- 4504 - 301 -30 157642 9213
10- 4504 - 301 -30 157608 9030
10- 4504 - 470 -47 164507
10- 4512- 520 -52 162929 8843
10- 4504 - 343 -30 9039
40- 4504 - 801 -80 8912
PRO SERVICE
30- 4201- 781 -78
53632
9394
MACHETE /TAPE
10- 4504 - 260 -26
081296
5353
FLAGGING TAPE
10- 4504 - 260 -26
081337
5353
DUMP CHARGE
10- 4504 - 314 -30
35048
9141
TABULATOR KEYS
MONTHLY PAYMENT
10- 4504 - 140 -14
10- 4504- 540 -54
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
10-4233-440 -44
9230
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
9224
h h h h x h
R
95.99
*
247C27
08/21/90
402.00
9224
COMPUTERLAND
GENDER MENDER
402.00
*
247C28
08/27/90
173.26 - !76.26
COMPUTERLAND
FONT CARTRIDGE
173.26 *�e-*
9302
k * * k k k
247C35
08/27/90
147.00
147.00
247C38
08/28/90
14,173.15
h h k h k k
14,173.15
247C46
08/27/90
104.13
..247C46
08/27/90
88.61
hxxxxh
192.74
247C49
08/27/90
319.00
247C49
08/27/90
24.25 -29-99
247C49
08/27/90
24.25
-
247C49
08/27/90
33.00
247C49
08/27/90
17.54
247C49
08/27/90
300.00
247C49
08/27/90
230.00
kk * *kk
nnn *
899.54* -'°' -�n 2
247C54
08/21/90
45.44
k k k k h h
45.44
247C65
08/21/90
86.00
247C65
08/21/90
156.50
247065
08/21/90
99.95
h R h h h x
342.45
247C71
08/23/90
114.05
114.05
hkkkkx
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
CHEMLAWN SPRAY WEEDS
CHEMSEARCH CHEMICALS
CITYLINE
ADVERTISING
CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP SCOTT UPGRADE KITS
COLOR TILE
COLOR TILE
SUPPLIES
TOOLS /ACCESSORIES
09 -04 -90 PAGE 10
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
10- 4566 - 643 -64 6261
10-4566- 643 -64 9047
* ** -CKS
30- 4214 - 781 -78 625 9551
* ** -CKS
10- 4901 - 440 -44 58454 8861
* ** -CKS
30- 4504 - 782 -78 8653
30- 4580 - 782 -78 8653
* ** -CKS
COMPUTERLAND
EXPANDED MEMORY
10-4233-440 -44
9230
COMPUTERLAND
GENDER MENDER
10- 4504 - 420 -42
9224
COMPUTERLAND
CREDIT
10- 4504- 420 -42
9224
COMPUTERLAND
CONTROLING CABLE
10- 4504 - 420 -42
9224
COMPUTERLAND
GENDER MENDER
10- 4504 - 510 -51
9224
COMPUTERLAND
INSTALLATION
10- 4901 - 140 -14
COMPUTERLAND
FONT CARTRIDGE
10- 4901 - 160 -16
9302
* ** -CKS
CONVEYORS FREIGHT CHARGES 10- 4540 - 560 -56 3379 7074
CONTACT MOBILE COMM REC CRYSTAL REPAIR
CONTACT MOBILE COMM GENERAL SUPPLIES
CONTACT MOBILE COMM POWER SUPPLY
COOL AIR MECHANICAL REPAIRS
* ** -CKS
10- 4294 - 560 -56 17012 9149
10- 4504 - 260 -26 16974 9138
10- 4540 - 560 -56 17011 9142
* ** -CKS
28- 4248 - 704 -70 52414 8512
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
CHECK REGISTER
76245
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
76249
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
247C79
08/23/90
7.87
* ** -CKS
CRICKET PHOTO
PROCESSING
247C79
08/23/90
7.87-
30- 4288 - 780 -78
CRICKET PHOTO
PROCESSING
247C79
08/23/90
7.87
30- 4288 - 782 -78
CRICKET PHOTO
PROCESSING
* k x k * *
7.87
* ** -CKS
247C93
08/21/90
213.72
CERT HYD SPEC
REPAIR PARTS
247C93
08/21/90
276.36
CERT HYD SPEC
CONTROL CABLES
27- 4624 - 663 -66
490.08
A k A k x k
247D07
08/27/90
48.13
D.C. HEY CO.
SERVICE /COPIER
* k * k x *
48.13
247D33
08/27/90
477.75
DAVIS- EUGENE
WEED CONTROL
247D33
08/27/90
79.56
DAVIS- EUGENE
MILEAGE
k k k * k
557.31
*
247D70
08/27/90
265.81
DPC INDUSTRIES
POOL CHEMICALS
k k x k k
265.81
*
247D86
08/28/90
73.68
DENNYS 5th AV BAKE
ROLLS
247D86
08/24/90
284.40
DENNYS 5th AV BAKE
ROLLS
k k k * k *
358.08
*
247D88
08/28/90
127.54
DUO CHEM
CLEANER
kkkkk.c
127.54
*
247E02
08/21/90
520.34
E KRAEMER & SONS INC
FILL MATERIAL
k k k * * k
520.34
247E14
08/21/90
438.03
EARL F. ANDERSON
SIGNS
* k * k k k
438.03
247E20
08/24/90
85.00-
ECOLAB PEST ELIM.
PEST CONTROL
247E20
08/24/90
85.00
ECOLAB PEST ELIM.
PEST CONTROL
.247E20
08/24/90
85.00
ECOLAB PEST ELIM.
PEST CONTROL
85.00
09 -04 -90 PAGE 11
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4504 - 200 -20 56870
10- 4508 - 200 -20 56870
10- 4508- 200 -20 56870
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
76245
9152
10- 4540 - 560 -56
76249
9148
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
30- 4288 - 781 -78
188789
9503
* ** -CKS
30- 4288 - 780 -78
P67341
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 600 -60
P67341
30- 4288 - 782 -78
10- 4208 - 600 -60
* ** -CKS
26- 4564 - 682 -68
795087
7773
* * *. -CKS
27- 4624 - 663 -66
8067
27- 4624 - 663 -66
8067
* ** -CKS
10- 4512 - 440 -44
7206 9446
* ** -CKS
40- 4504 - 803 -80
12951 7094
* ** -CKS
10- 4542 - 325 -30
99124 9151
* ** -CKS
30- 4288 - 780 -78
P67341
30- 4288 - 780 -78
P67341
30- 4288 - 782 -78
P67341
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
247E21
08j28/90
k k k* k k
247E75
08/21/90
k k k k k k
247F11
08/21/90
247F11
08/23/90
247F11
08/21/90
247F11
08/27/90
k k k k k k
247F47
08/28/90
k k k k k k
247F70
08/28/90
* k k k k
247F76
08/24/90
k k k k k k
247G02.
08/21/90
* k k k k k
247G08
08/28/90
k k k k k k
247G16
08/23/90
* k k k k
247G24
08/21/90
247G24
08/21/90
k* k k k k
247G26
08/23/90
AMOUNT
1,495.00
1,495.00 *
300.00
300.00 *
19.95
353.22
2,130.63
1,912.73
4,416.53 *
4.62
4.62 *
468.00
468.00 *
6.79
6.79 *
530.00
530.00 *
1,651.50
1,651.50 *
44.80
44.80 *
47.30
64.76
112.06 *
36.68
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ECOMARC INC ODOR CONTROL
EMPLOYEES CLUB SUPPLIES
09 -04 -90 PAGE 12
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
40- 4504 - 801 -80 3220 9192
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 500 -50
* ** -CKS
FEED RITE CONTROL
CYLINDER WRENCH
26- 4504 - 682 -68
144200
FEED RITE CONTROL
CHLORINE
26- 4564 - 682 -68
144709
FEED RITE CONTROL
H2O CHEMICALS
40- 4622 - 805 -80
144348
7342
FEED RITE CONTROL
WATER CHEMICALS
40- 4622 - 805 -80
145057
7342
* ** -CKS
FOWLER ELECTRIC
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
118390
9486
* ** -CKS
FRIDEN ALCATEL
METER RENTAL
10- 4290 - 510 -51
* ** -CKS
FLAHERTY EQUIP CORP
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
9210
* ** -CKS
LIZ GEREBI
SERVICES
30- 4201 - 781 -78
kkk -CKS
G.L. CONTRACTING INC
EMERGENCY REPAIR
40- 4248 - 801 -80
27933
9279
* ** -CKS
GAS SUPPLY INC.
HOTPLATE
10- 4620 - 560 -56
60888
8424
* ** -CKS
GEN. COMMUNICATIONS
RADIO REPAIR
10- 4294 - 560 -56
69498
GEN. COMMUNICATIONS
EXTERNAL SPEAKERS
10- 4294 - 560 -56
69499
* ** -CKS
GENERAL OFFICE PROD
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
* * * * **
36.68
*
247G62
08/23/90
102.00
GRANDMA S CUPBOARD
POPCORN
102.00
*
247G88
08/21/90
448.80
GRUBER POWER EQUIP
EQUIPMENT PARTS
448.80
*
247H04
08/21/90
176.44
HACH CO.
REPAIR PARTS
176.44
247H09
08/21/90
119.90
HALLMAN
WINDOW WASH
247H09
08/21/90
179.85
HALLMAN
OIL
299.75
* * * * **
247H21
08/24/90
106.40
HARMON GLASS
GLASS
106.40
247H23
08/27/90
9,392.00
HARRIS HOMEYER CO.
INSURANCE
247H23
08/27/90
4,863.00
HARRIS HOMEYER CO.
INSURANCE
247H23
08/27/90
28,377.00
HARRIS HOMEYER CO.
INSURANCE
42,632.00
247H28
08/28/90
1,295.00
HAYDEN- MURPHY EQUIP
EQUIPMENT
247H28
08/28/90
1,295.00
HAYDEN- MURPHY EQUIP
EQUIPMENT
2,590.00
*
247H33
08/28/90
58.12
HENN CTY SHERIFF
JAIL /WORKHOUSE
58.12
*
247H34
08/28/90
10,774.05
HENN COUNTY TREAS.
JAIL /WORKHOUSE
10,774.05
*
247H37
08/28/90
. 1,080.00
HENN TECH CENTER
TRAINING
1,080.00
*
* * * * **
09 -04 -90 PAGE 13
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.* MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
27- 4624 - 663 -66 5517
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 646 -64 8953
* ** -CKS
40- 4540 - 803 -80 322215 9046
* ** -CKS
10- 4620 - 560 -56 54494 8432
27- 4504 - 664 -66 100511 8921
* ** -CKS
10- 4248 - 560 -56 9028
* ** -CKS
10 -4260- 510 -51
10- 4260 - 510 -51
10- 4260 - 510 -51
* ** -CKS
40- 4580 - 803 -80 3821 9121
41- 4504 - 900 -90 3821 9121
* ** -CKS
10- 4286 - 220 -22
10- 4286 - 220 -22 21189
* ** -CKS
10- 4202 - 440 -44 022967 9445
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
STAMP
247H62
08,A21190
8.70
REMOVE RADIATOR
247H62
08/23/90
10.00
IRRIGATION PARTS
JERRYS FOODS
CLEANING SOAP
18.70
*
247H63
08/21/90
352.00
GENERAL SUPPLIES
* *xx *k
MANUALS
352.00
*
247H85
08/21/90
92.50
247H85
08/24/90
28.50
* ** -CKS
8 -90 10- 4208 - 160 -16
121.00
*
247I23
08/28/90
26.37
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 390 -30
53433
26.37
247J27
08/28/90
42.77
* ** -CKS
247J27
08/23/90
25.27 22.27
rtx * *xR
68.04*
247J35
08/21/90
204.87
247J35
08/21/90
223.69
247J35
08/27/90
1,160.35
Kxx * **
1,588.91
247J41
08/21/90
308.64
247J41
08/21/90
356.73
665.37
247J74
08/21/90
128.01
128.01
247J99
08/28/90
40.00
40.00
*
247K05
08/21/90
385.00
385.00
*
247K09.
08/21/90
172.76
CHECK REGISTER
3332
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
HOFF - WILLIAMSON
RUBBER STAMP
HOFF - WILLIAMSON
STAMP
HOFFERS INC
PAINT
HUMPHREY RADIATOR
REMOVE RADIATOR
HUMPHREY RADIATOR
REPAIR /CLEAN
INDELCO CORP
IRRIGATION PARTS
JERRYS FOODS
CLEANING SOAP
JERRYS FOODS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
JERRYS PRINTING
GENERAL SUPPLIES
JERRYS PRINTING
GENERAL SUPPLIES
JERRYS PRINTING
MANUALS
JIM HATCH SALES
SHOVELS
JIM HATCH SALES
GAS CANS
JUSTUS LUMBER SUPPLIES
JANET CANTON. MILEAGE 8- 15/8 -2
K & K SALES EXIT DEVICE
KAMAN INDUST TECH BEARING
ACCOUNT NO. IN
10- 4504 - 180 -18
40- 4504 - 807 -80
10- 4563 - 642 -64
10- 4248 - 560 -56
10- 4248 - 560 -56
09 -04 -90 PAGE 14
V. # P.O. # MESSAGE
601296
601371 9199
9202
* ** -CKS
8913
9156
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 643 -64 54143 9155
* ** -CKS
10- 4512 - 440 -44
23- 4504 - 611 -61
10- 4504 - 490 -49
3332
10- 4504 - 490 -49
3476
10- 4600 - 180 -18
3589
9488
* ** -CKS
10- 4580 - 301 -30
10781
8780
40- 4504 - 801 -80
10780
8781
* ** -CKS
30- 4544 - 782 -78
49593
9144
* ** -CKS
8 -90 10- 4208 - 160 -16
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 390 -30
53433
8482
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
8708
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
247K09
08/21/90
k k n r w R
247K35
08/21/90
247K35
08/27/90
247K35
08/21/90
247K35
08/27/90
247K35
08/27/90
247K35
08/21/90
247K35
08/23/90
247K35
08/21/90
247K35
08/23/90
k * k k * *
247K42
08/21/90
247K42
08/21/90
247K42
08/21/90
247K42
08/21/90
* k * k * *
247L01
08/23/90
247L02
08/27/90
k * w * * k
247L04
08/21/90
kkkkk k
247L06
08/28/90
247L06
08/28/90
kkkkk *
247L16
08/27/90
* * k k k
247L28
08/21/90
247L28
08/21/90
247L28
08/21/90
247L28
08/24/90
247L28
08/21/90
AMOUNT
9.81
182.57
131.70
82.98
222.14
10.78
19.19
43.24
120.74
6.79
29.89
667.45
4,683.85
4,379.86
PRODUCTS
4,689.51
10- 4504 - 301 -30
4,497.48
170.75
18,250.70
*
945.00
GENERAL SUPPLIES
945.00
*
1,094.76
1,094.76
*
275.00
10- 4504 - 560 -56
275.00
*
684.00
LAWSON
1,316.00
RIVETS
2,000.00
*
49.48
49.48
*
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
KAMAN INDUST TECH REPAIR PARTS
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KOCH MATERIALS CO
KOCH MATERIALS CO
KOCH MATERIALS CO
KOCH MATERIALS CO
LINDA KOZAK
LABOR RELATIONS ASN
LAHASS
LAKE RESTORATION
LAKE RESTORATION
LAMOTTE CHEMICAL
TOOLS
TOOLS
LUMBER
LUMBER
LUMBER
LUMBER
LUMBER
LUMBER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ASPHALT
ASPHALT
ASPHALT
ASPHALT
09 -04 -90 PAGE 15
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4540 - 560 -56 8892
10- 4580 - 301 -30
10- 4580 - 646 -64
10- 4604 - 646 -64
10- 4604 - 646 -64
10- 4604 - 646 -64
10- 4604 - 646 -64
10 =4604- 646 -64
10- 4604 - 646 -64
28- 4504 - 702 -70
757741 8960
765217 9286
771377 9041
775517 9410
775287 9419
765776 9189
765131 9268
765596 9203
774958 9249
10- 4526 - 314 -30 800708 9147
10- 4526 - 314 -30 712196 9146
10- 4526- 314 -30 801938 8649
10- 4526 - 314 -30 800091 9145
SERVICE 8/29- 9/11/90 30- 4201 - 781 -78
FEE FOR SERVICE 10- 4201 - 140 -14
MAINT INSPEC
WEED SPRAY
WEED SPRAY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4248 - 560 -56 10190 8799
41- 4201 - 902 -90 4005 9342
41- 4201 - 902 -90 4004 9342
30- 4504 - 782 -78 240327 9250
215.22
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
TAPE
10- 4504 - 301 -30
8696
170.75
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 322 -30
8695
125.91
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 560 -56
8583
77.22
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
RIVETS
10- 4504 - 560 -56
8578
284.38
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
DRILL BITS
10- 4504 - 560 -56
8881
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
DEVELOP FILM
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
247L28
08/21/90
221.97
176455
247L28
08/21/90
77.22
247L28
08/21/90
442.31
FORD
247L28
08/21/90
307.94
88052
w *wwww
FORD
1,922.92
SERVICE /PARTS
247L36
08/27/90
228.00
FORD
TRACT
CREDIT
228.00
96324
247L44
08/28/90
70.00
REPAIR PARTS
wwwwww
111973 9096
70.00
247L56
08/21/90
10.75
247L56
08/27/90
21.83
32.58
247L66
08/24/90
46.85 -
247`L66
08/24/90
291.63
-
247L66
08/24/90
3.50
-
247L66
08/21/90
57.94
.�
-346-Q4---*
299.22*
247L70
08/24/90
180.00
wwwwww
180.00
247L82
08/27/90
9.68
*www *w
9.68
247M02
08/28/90
538.40
247M02
08/21/90
290.11
828.51
ww *www
247M18
08/24/90
259.60
w *w *w*
259.60
247M22
08/21/90
381.48
247M22
08/21/90
381.48
762.96
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS
LAWSON PRODUCTS TOOLS
LAWSON PRODUCTS BOLTS /NUTS
LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS /HUBS
LEFFLER PRINTING PRINTING
LEAANNS SEW /DECO GEAR REPAIR
09 -04 -90 PAGE 16
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4540 - 520 -52 8694
10- 4580 - 560 -56 8578
10- 4620 - 560 -56 8698
40- 4540 - 803 -80 8697
* ** -CKS
30- 4600 - 781 -78 4287 9549
* ** -CKS
10- 4248 - 440 -44 89079 9444
* ** -CKS
LINHOFF
DEVELOP FILM
10- 4504- 260 -26
174923
LINHOFF
MAGAZINE
12- 4215 - 434 -43
176455
* ** -CKS
LONG LAKE
FORD
TRACT
CREDIT
10- 4540 - 560 -56
88052
LONG LAKE
FORD
TRACT
SERVICE /PARTS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
107868 9208
LONG LAKE
FORD
TRACT
CREDIT
10- 4540 - 560 -56
96324
LONG LAKE
FORD
TRACT
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
111973 9096
LUCY ROSCHE
CLEANING
LYNDALE HARDWARE SUPPLIES
* ** -CKS
27- 4201 - 662 -66 30596 8286
* ** -CKS
30- 4504 - 782 -78 320879 9324
* ** -CKS
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 7308 8789
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 7452 9150
MCGARVEY COFFEE COFFEE
27- 4624 - 663 -66 57959 7184
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
MCNEILUS STEEL 4X8 STEEL PLATE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 6225 8876
MCNEILUS STEEL 4X8 -STEEL PLATE 10- 4620 - 560 -56 6226 8875
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
09 -04 -90
PAGE 17
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
#
MESSAGE
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
247M27-
98"28¢99
''^
90
MERIT SUPPLY
MBULANeE -2
ANeE eeLLEei
- --t8 -3 i —80-000=610
247M27
08/21/90
281.30
MERIT SUPPLY
POLYLINERS
10- 4504 - 645 -64
24950
9183
247M27
08/21/90
382.40
MERIT SUPPLY
MISC SUPPLIES
10- 4512.- 540 -54
24861
8958
247M27
08/24/90
165.50
MERIT SUPPLY
MISC SUPPLIES
10- 4512 - 540 -54
24929
9160
247M27
08/28/90
1,160.00
MERIT SUPPLY
FERTILIZER
10- 4558 - 643 -64
25032
9289
247M27
08/24/90
20.70
MERIT SUPPLY
BAGS
27- 4504 - 662 -66
24986
9231
247M27
08/24/90
155.40
MERIT SUPPLY
SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 664 -66
24975
247M27
08/21/90
478.50
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 664 -66
24949
9222
247M27
08/23/90
265.00
MERIT SUPPLY.
CLEANING
28- 4512 - 702 -70
24930
9175
247M27
08/21/90
489.00
MERIT SUPPLY
SUPPLIES
30- 4504- 781 -78
24927
9176
247M27
08/24/90
365.00
MERIT SUPPLY
SUPPLIES
30- 4504- 782 -78
24992
9322
247M27
08/21/90
306.44
MERIT SUPPLY
SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
24951
9177
247M27
08/21/90
479.70
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
30- 4512 - 782 -78
24964
9239
247M27
08/27/90
479.30
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
30- 4512 - 782 -78
25024
9464
247M27
08/21/90
428.90
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
30- 4512- 782 -78
24963
9238
247M27
08/27/90
422.85
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
30- 4512- 782 -78
25023
9463
5,879.99 6,ii5.99
*
247M29
08/28/90
236.00*
MESSERLI & KRAMER
AMBULANCE COLLECT
10- 3180 - 000 -•00
(2 inv.)
* ** -CKS
247M32
08/23/90
220.83
M AMUNDSON
CIGARETTES
50- 4632 - 862 -86
166
220.83
* * k * k
* ** -CKS
247M35
08/21/90
218,619.58
METRO WASTE CONTROL
SEWER CHARGES
40- 4312 - 812 -80
505009
218,619.58
* * * k x
* ** -CKS
247M42
08/21/90
181.45
MIDWEST ASPHALT COR.
BLACKTOP
10- 4524- 301 -30
4229
181.45
* * * * k
* ** -CKS
247M44
08/28/90
110.96
MIDWEST CHEM SUPPLY
TRASH BAGS
10- 4504 - 440 -44
2120
8864
110.96
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
247M46
08/27/90
44.00
METZ BAKING CO
HOTDOG BUNS
26- 4624 - 683 -68
7194
247M46
08/24/90
140.52
METZ BAKING CO
BREAD
27- 4624 - 663 -66
5511
247M46
08/24/90
133.56
METZ BAKING CO
BREAD
27- 4624 - 663 -66
5511
318.08
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
247M68
08/28/90
77.38
MN CELLULAR PHONE
CAR PHONE
10- 4204 - 100 -10
247M68
08/28/90
25.05
MN CELLULAR PHONE
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226- 420 -42
247M68
08/28/90
39.90
MN CELLULAR PHONE
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
247M68
08/28/90
25.18
MN CELLULAR PHONE
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
247M68
08/28/90
21.75
MN
247M68
08f28/90
7.95
10- 4226 - 420 -42
247M68
08/28/90
151.73
CELLULAR
247M68
08/28/90
44.55
247M68
08/28/90
21.30
PHONE
247M68
08/28/90
83.67
247M68
08/28/90
17.56
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
•
516.02
MN
247M69
08/21/90
121.80
10- 4226 - 420 -42
* * * k Yt k
121.80
CELLULAR
247M75
08/28/90
16.66
247M75
08/28/90
16.66
PHONE
247M75
08/28/90
16.68
8852
MCC /MIDWEST
50.00
23- 4588 - 611 -61
247M76
08/24/90
106.21
r k * x k
106.21
`247M80
08/28/90
52.19
VET
247M80
08/28/90
24.19
247M80
08/28/90
24.19
ADVERTISING
247M80
08/28/90
56.06
MN
247M80
08/28/90
11.21
50- 4214 - 862 -86
247M80
08/28/90
10.03
GLOVE
247M80
08/28/90
48.32
37130
8586
226.19
247M81
08/21/90
43.64
* ** -CKS
247M81
08/21/90
90.20
PUBLIC HRG BA -292
247M81
08/24/90
89.13
MN
* * * k k k
NEWS
222.97
10- 4210 - 140 -14
247M85
08/21/90
24.50
SUBURBAN
.247M85
08/21/90
37.20
88514
247M85
08/27/90
18.00
NEWS
PUBLIC HRG S -50
10- 4210 - 140 -14
79.70
247M90
08/21/90
250.25
PUBLIC HRG NOTICE
247M90
08/24/90
119.00
MN
SUBURBAN
NEWS
369.25
10- 4210 - 140 -14
247M92
08/23/90
32.75
SUBURBAN
NEWS
PUBLIC HRG E -32.
32.75
8851
CHECK REGISTER
09 -04 -90 PAGE 18
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
# MESSAGE
MN
CELLULAR
PHONE
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
- MN
CELLULAR
PHONE
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
MN
CELLULAR
PHONE
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
MN
CELLULAR
PHONE
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
MN
CELLULAR
PHONE
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
MN
CELLULAR
PHONE
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
MN
CELLULAR
PHONE
PHONE RENTAL
10- 4226 - 440 -44
8852
MCC /MIDWEST
CRAFT SUPPLIES
23- 4588 - 611 -61
43801
9086
* ** -CKS
MN
VIETNAM
VET
ADVERTISING
50- 4214 - 822 -82
MN
VIETNAM
VET
ADVERTISING
50- 4214 - 842 -84
MN
VIETNAM
VET
ADVERTISING
50- 4214 - 862 -86
MN.
GLOVE
GLOVES
10- 4504 - 301 -30
37130
8586
* ** -CKS
MN
SUBURBAN
NEWS
PUBLIC HRG BA -292
10- 4210 - 140 -14
88510
MN
SUBURBAN
NEWS
ORD 312 -A2
10- 4210 - 140 -14
88513
MN
SUBURBAN
NEWS
AD FOR BIDS
10- 4210- 140 -14
88514
MN
SUBURBAN
NEWS
PUBLIC HRG S -50
10- 4210 - 140 -14
88512
MN
SUBURBAN
NEWS
PUBLIC HRG NOTICE
10- 4210 - 140 -14
88457
MN
SUBURBAN
NEWS
NOTICE FILING DATES
10- 4210 - 140 -14
88456
MN
SUBURBAN
NEWS
PUBLIC HRG E -32.
10- 4210 - 140 -14
8851
MN..
TORO INC.
IRRIGATION PARTS
10- 4540 - 646 -64
140693
8963
MN.
TORO INC.
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
141868
9091
MN.
TORO INC.
IRRIGATION PARTS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
143485
9219
* ** -CKS
MN.
WANNER
3 WAY VALVES
10- 4540 - 560 -56
75977
MN.
WANNER
NYALL HOSE
10- 4540 - 560 -56
76005
MN.
WANNER
WELD BRACKET
10- 4540 - 646 -64
76190
* ** -CKS
MODEL STONE
CO.
HAND CURB
10- 4528 - 314 -30
93558
7098
MODEL STONE
CO.
CONCRETE
41- 4518 - 900 -90
93846
7098
* ** -CKS
MONARCH MARKETING
MONARCH REPAIR
50- 4516 - 860 -86
538803
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
* ** -CKS
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
247M93
08/21/90
234.50
* ** -CKS
247M93
08/21/90
63.86
k * * k k k
298.36
* ** -CKS
247NO3
08/23/90
570.00
247NO3
08/23/90
630.00
k k k k rt k
1,200.00
* ** -CKS
247N07
08/27/90
153.99
rtkxkkx
153.99
247N16
08/24/90
9,446.11
k rt x rt x.
9,446.11
247N21
08/21/90
67.17
247N21
08/21/90
45.68
rtxkkxx
112.85
247N31
08/21/90
40.55
*xkkrtx
40.55
247N36
08/24/90
91.84
k k k k k k
91.84
247N62
08/21/90
1,139.00
k k * * k
1,139.00
247N72
08/21/90
1,184.26
k k k k k k
1,184.26
247N82
08/23/90
79.40
247N82
08/21/90
314.79
k k* k
394.19
k k
247024
08/28/90
290.70
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
MOTOROLA INC SERVICE CALL
MOTOROLA INC BATTERY
MPLS SEWER & WATER SERVICE REPAIR
MPLS SEWER & WATER SERVICE REPAIR
MTS NW SOUND
NSP
NAPA AUTO PARTS
NAPA AUTO PARTS
NERCO DISTRIBUTING
MACHINE /EQUIPMENT
POWER /LIGHT
GASKETS /RELAYS
IMPELLER /COIL
POPCORN /PRETZELS
NORTHERN REPAIR PARTS
NORTHLAND ELEC SUP GENERAL SUPPLIES
NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES
NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST /GOODS SOLD
NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY EASELS
OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING
ACCOUNT NO. IN
10- 4248 - 520 -52
10- 4294 - 560 -56
40- 4248 - 803 -80
40- 4248 - 803 -80
09 -04 -90 PAGE 19
V. # P.O. # MESSAGE
9188
9143
* ** -CKS
20886 9256
20880 9257.
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56 2440 9033
* ** -CKS
30- 4504 - 782 -78 105833 8138
* ** -CKS
f��II[:�[�•YY�II•Y7
* ** -CKS
23- 4624 - 613 -61 175319 9088
30- 4504 - 781 -78 172425 7059
* ** -CKS
10- 4600 - 420 -42 31091 9295
* ** -CKS
30- 1340 - 782 -78
85654
9552
* ** -CKS
30- 4252 - 782 -78
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
734634
9031
10- 4540 - 560 -56
735397
9123
* ** -CKS
26- 4624 - 683 -68
026487
7070
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56 2440 9033
* ** -CKS
30- 4504 - 782 -78 105833 8138
* ** -CKS
f��II[:�[�•YY�II•Y7
* ** -CKS
23- 4624 - 613 -61 175319 9088
30- 4504 - 781 -78 172425 7059
* ** -CKS
10- 4600 - 420 -42 31091 9295
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
* ** -CKS
40- 4201 - 803 -80
49838 9221
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE -
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
247024
08/28/90
76.00
OFFSET PRINTING
PRINTING
xxxxxx
A
366.70
* ** -CKS
27- 4288 - 662 -66
247027
08/28/90
1,404.00
* ** -CKS
OLD DOMINION BRUSH
BROOM STOCK
xxxxxx
1,404.00
* ** -CKS
*
247036
08/21/90
254.00
OLSON CHAIN & CABLE
U BOLT
247036
08/24/90
100.00
OLSON CHAIN & CABLE
CHAIN
354.00
*
247037
08/21/90
153.00
BILL OLSON
BLACK DIRT
153.00
*
247038
08/28/90
9,475.00
OLSON FIRE PRO.
CONSTRUCTION
xxxxxx
9,475.00
*
247050
08/21/90
195.25
OWENS SERVICE CO
SERV MCQUAY UNITS
xxrtxxx
195.25
247PO3
08/21/90
1,816.72
PACE LAB
H2O ANALYSIS
xxxxxx
1,816.72
247P31
08/27/90
1,400.00
PETER COTTON
PRO SERVICES
1,400.00
*
247P34
0 3/21/90
3,467.91
PERSONNEL DECISIONS
FEE FOR SERVICE
xxxxxx
3,467.91
*
247P80
08/21/90
397.69
PRIOR LAKE AGG.
SAND
397.69
xxxxxx
247Q09
08/24/90
145.00
QUALITY REFRIG
CONTRACT MAINT
xxxxxx
145.00
247Q22
08/23/90
223.70
QUIK PRINT
PRINTING
223.70
xxrtxxx
09 -04 -90 PAGE 20
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4600 - 420 -42 31092 9296
* ** -CKS
10- 4534 - 310 -30 4579 8906
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56 101724 8671
27- 4504- 666 -66 102263 9338
41- 4552 - 900 -90 7105
27- 1300 - 005 -00 9343 7135
* ** -CKS
30- 4288 - 782 -78 49073 9298
* ** -CKS
40- 4201 - 803 -80
49838 9221
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 440 -44
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 440 -44
27767
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 301 -30
9140
* ** -CKS
27- 4288 - 662 -66
106922
* ** -CKS
28- 4600 - 701 -70
039172 9228
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
09 -04
-90
PAGE 21
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
#
MESSAGE
247R12
08/23/90
13.32
RADIO SHACK ACCT REC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42
020716
13.32
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
247R22
08/27/90
45.00
REM SUPPLIES
LIGHT BULBS
30- 4504 - 782 -78
01194
9550
247R22
08/21/90
26.28
REM SUPPLIES
LIGHT BULBS
30- 4504 - 782 -78
01186
9297
247R22
08/21/90
760.00
REM SUPPLIES
SCREEN PANELS
30- 4504 - 783 -78
01183
9237
831.28
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
247R79
08/27/90
644.30
RTW INC.
FEE FOR SERVICE
10- 4260 - 510 -51
247R79
08/23/90
1,100.95
RTW INC.
FEE FOR SERVICE
10- 4260 - 510 -51
1,745.25
* ** -CKS
247S03
08/24/90
145.87
S.T. ROBB
RAWL STUD
10- 4504 - 301 -30
53762
9018
247S03
08/21/90
9.07
S.T. ROBB
PARTS
10- 4540 - 646 -64
53832
9180
154.94
*
* * * *.*
* ** -CKS
247S11
08/28/90
182.00
SCHMIDT MUSIC
MISIC SUPPLIES
10- 4596 - 627 -62
182.00
*
L
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
247S19
08/21/90
70.35
SEELYE PLASTICS
PUC PIPE
40- 4540 - 803 -80
179573
9023
247S19
08/21/90
47.05
SEELYE PLASTICS
PUC PIPE
40- 4540 - 803 -80
179575
9040
117.40
* ** -CKS
247S27
08/24/90
25.54
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
PAINT THINNER /KNIFE
10- 4504 - 325 -30
62287
9038
247527
08/24/90
17.09
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
PAINT
27- 4504 - 666 -66
63293
9479
247S27
08/27/90
11.07
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
HYDRANT PAINT
40- 4544 - 803 -80
91793
8418
53.70
* * **
* ** -CKS
247S35
08/28/90
22.95
SOUTHERN VACUUM
FLOOR MAINT
50- 4236 - 821 -82
247S35
08/28/90
28.95
SOUTHERN VACUUM
VACUUM REPAIR
50- 4248 - 861 -86
51.90
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
247S45
08/28/90
54.16
ST. PAUL BOOK
GEN SUP /AC
10- 4504- 470 -47
048737
.247S45
08/24/90
21.50
ST. PAUL BOOK
SUPPLIES
27- 4516- 661 -66
002437
9478
75.66
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
247S67
08/23/90
3,208.00
STORE FRONT
HUMAN SERVICES
10- 4201 - 504 -50
112309
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
09 -04 -90
PAGE 22
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
#
MESSAGE
3,208.00
xxxxxx
S
xxx -CKS
.247S77
08/24/90
100.00
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
DED WARRANTY
10- 4248 - 560 -56
107631
247577
08/21/90
35.25
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
ADAPTOR
10- 4540 - 560 -56
129980
247577
08/24/90
13.35
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
LOCK
10- 4540 - 560 -56
130553
247S77
08/24/90
16.05
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
T- HANDLE
10- 4540 - 560 -56
130638
247577
08/21/90
3.94
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
DUCT AIR
10- 4540 - 560 -56
130089
247S77
08/24/90
15.00
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
HANDLE
10- 4540 - 560 -56
130565
183.59
247S78
08/21/90
67.60
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
PUMPHOUSE PARTS
40- 4540 - 801 -80
8902
247S78
08/27/90
12.91
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
PUC PIPING
40- 4540 - 803 -80
9181
80.51
** *xxx
xxx -CKS
247586
08/23/90
111.05
SUPRA COLOR LABS
PHOTOGRAPHIC
10- 4508 - 420 -42
307438
111.05
xxxxxx
xxx -CKS
247S92
08/28/90
33.80
SYSTEM SUPPLY
DISKETTES
10- 4504 - 140 -14
80799
9502
247S92
08/28/90
16.90
SYSTEM SUPPLY
DISKETTES
10- 4504 - 260 -26
80799
9502
247S92
08/28/90
33.68
SYSTEM SUPPLY
RIBBONS /DISKETTES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
80799
8502
84.38
xxxxxx
xxx -CKS
247S95
08/28/90
146.73
SERVICE SALES CORP
MONARCH LABELS
50- 4516- 820 -82
37873
8734
247S95
08/28/90
243.77
SERVICE SALES CORP
MONARCH LABELS
50- 4516- 820 -82
38563
8734
247595
08/28/90
146.73
SERVICE SALES CORP
MONARCH LABELS
50- 4516 - 840 -84
37873
8734
247S95
08/28/90
243.77
SERVICE SALES CORP
MONARCH LABELS
50- 4516 - 840 -84
38563
8734
247S95
08/28/90
146.74
SERVICE SALES CORP
MONARCH LABELS
50- 4516 - 860 -86
37873
8734
247595
08/28/90
243.79
SERVICE SALES CORP
MONARCH LABELS
50- 4516 - 860 -86
38563
8734
1,171.53
xxxxxx
xxx -CKS
247T10
08/28/90
480.00
TERRY ANN SALES CO
CUPS
27- 4504 - 663 -66
247T10
08/28/90
133.30
TERRY ANN SALES CO
SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 663 -66
613.30
*
xxxxxx
x ** -CKS
247T13
08/28/90
960.00
TOM HORWATH
FORESTRY
10-4201- 644 -64
960.00
*
xxxxxx
xxx -CKS
247T40
08/21/90
145.30
TOLL COMPANY
GAS
10- 4610 - 560 -56
117730
8898
247T40
08/21/90
64.77
TOLL COMPANY
WELDING SUPPLIES
10- 4610 - 560 -56
403162
9136
210.07
*
xxxxxx
xxx -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
09 -04 -90
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
247T72
08/21/90
214.20
TROPICAL SNOW
* * * rt * rt
10666
214.20
*
247T74
08/24/90
2,079.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
2,079.00
*
247T96
08/28/90
231.00
247T96
08/21/90
359.10
* * k k * rt
* ** -CKS
590.10
DOOR REPAIR
247U14
08/28/90
474.25
247U14
08/21/90
344.01
10077
* k * * * A
818.26
247U17
08/21/90
188.00
* ** -CKS
rt rt k * * A
SIGNAL PARTS
188.00
51725
247U25
08/28/90
47.98
STARTER
40- 4540 - 801 -80
47.98
247V30
08/21/90
166.22
REPAIR PARTS
247V30
08/24/90
168.70 - }66.?e
334.92* 932-92
247V40
08/27/90
277.94
OXYGEN
* * * * k k
760411
277.94
247V46
08/21/90
39.14
* * * * k k
* ** -CKS
39.14
REPAIRS
247W08
08/21/90
100.41
VANTAGE ELECTRIC
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
100.41
11246
9478
247W10
08/27/90
65.03
* ** -CKS
CHECK REGISTER
09 -04 -90
PAGE 23
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
#
MESSAGE
TROPICAL SNO
TROPICAL SNOW
26- 4624 - 683 -68
10666
7689
* ** -CKS
TURF SUPPLY CO.
CHEMICALS
27- 4564 - 664 -66
31044
9305
* ** -CKS
TWIN CITY GAR. DOOR
DOOR REPAIR
10- 4248 - 440 -44
10471
9447
TWIN CITY GAR. DOOR
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 540 -54
10077
8705
* ** -CKS
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
SIGNAL PARTS
10- 4540 - 330 -30
51725
7073
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
STARTER
40- 4540 - 801 -80
8577
* ** -CKS
UHL CO
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
59881
9137
* ** -CKS
UNIVERSAL MED SERV
OXYGEN
10- 4510 - 440 -44
760411
5805
* ** -CKS
VANTAGE ELECTRIC
REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 646 -64
011245
9326
VANTAGE ELECTRIC
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
27- 4248 - 662 -66
11246
9478
* ** -CKS
VELDE
CONFERENCE
10- 4202 - 480 -48
* ** -CKS
VESSCO
CHLORINATOR PARTS
40- 4540 - 805 -80
8301
8470
* ** -CKS
W.W. GRAINGER
JAW PULLER
40- 4580 - 801 -80
8431
* ** -CKS
MERWYN WALKER
MILEAGE
27- 4208 - 661 -66
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
09 -04 -90
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
#
MESSAGE
65.03
t
* ** -CKS
247W28
08/21/90
114.00
147815
9036
114.00
247W49
08/24/90
46.00
* ** -CKS
247W49
08/24/90
404.25
24873
9209
450.25
SERVICE
247W66
08/24/90
90.67
247W66
08/24/90
111.17
247W66
08/24/90
37.04
THREAD HANDLE
247W66
08/24/90
37.04
* * * * **
DIAL /LEVEL
275.92
247W71
08/28/90
568.25
GENERAL SUPPLIES
40- 4504 - 802 -80
568.25
*
.247W76
08/27/90
223.99
* * * * **
223.99
*
247W81
08/24/90
16.00
* ** -CKS
247W81
08/24/90
16.00
32.00
*
247Z05
08/21/90
25.00
* ** -CKS
* * * * **
REPAIR PARTS
25.00
*
247Z14
08/21/90
72.54
* * * * **
72.54
* ** -CKS
347745
08/23/90
415.00
70201
8555
415.00
PROPANE
* * * * **
158,776.77
. 168 7nom
96
21.83
CHECK REGISTER
09 -04 -90
PAGE 24
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
#
MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
WATER PRODUCTS
3/4" COPPER
40- 4540 - 803 -80
147815
9036
* ** -CKS
WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT
SERVICE
10- 4540 - 540 -54
24873
9209
WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT
SERVICE
10- 4540 - 560 -56
24849
8967
* ** -CKS
WILLIAMS STEEL
THREAD HANDLE
10- 4580 - 301 -30
WILLIAMS STEEL
DIAL /LEVEL
10- 4580 - 560 -56
WILLIAMS STEEL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
40- 4504 - 802 -80
WILLIAMS STEEL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
40- 4504 - 803 -80
* ** -CKS
WINFLD DEV RENT TRU
RENT
10- 4201 - 627 -62
* ** -CKS
WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540 - 666 -66
43010
9054
* ** -CKS
WM H MCCOY
PROPANE
10- 4504 - 301 -30
70201
8555
WM H MCCOY
PROPANE
10- 4504- 301 -30
70851
8613
* ** -CKS
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
GLASS CLEANER
10- 4504 - 644 -64
9025
* ** -CKS
ZIEGLER INC
FILTER
10- 4248 - 560 -56
20723
9153
* ** -CKS
ELEANOR JONES
AMBULANCE REFUND
10- 3180 - 000 -00
* ** -CKS
FUND 10 TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
FUND 12 TOTAL
COMMUNICATIONS
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
AMOUNT
1,253-59
i,259.59
VENDOR
1,336.18
38,464.76
38,462.76
23
1,524.90
ART CENTER
20,108.06
26
237,824.82
3,400.74
3,567 0=0
7 Ann 7A
27
54,836.34
521,114.99*
52 ^'° 68
CHECK REGISTER
09 -04 -90 PAGE 25
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
FUND
23
TOTAL
ART CENTER
FUND
26
TOTAL
SWIMMING POOL FUND
FUND
27
TOTAL
GOLF COURSE FUND
FUND
28
TOTAL
RECREATION CENTER FUND
FUND
30
TOTAL
EDINBOROUGH PARK
FUND
40
TOTAL
UTILITY FUND
FUND
41
TOTAL
STORM SEWER UTILITY
FUND
50
TOTAL
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
FUND
60
TOTAL
CONSTRUCTION FUND
TOTAL