Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-11-19_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA. EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 19, 1990 ROLLCALL I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA MEETING OF NOVEMBER 6, 1990 II: AWARD OF BIDS - Centennial Lakes Park - Site Furnishings (Contd from 11/05/90) (Continue to 12/16/90) III. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL PROCLAMATION - Epilepsy Month I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no,_,separate discussion of such items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its ormal sequence on the agenda. II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Second Reading - Amendment to Zoning Ordinance,No. 825, Section 7.D - Customary Home Occupations - Conditional Use Permit for Certain Home Occupations by Handicapped Residents B. First Reading - Ordinance No. 171 -35 - Establishing Fee for Conditional - Use Permit for Certain Home Occupations by Handicapped Residents C. Preliminary Plat Approval - Farrells Parkwood Knolls - Tract A, R.L.S. 1286 located at 5700 Blake Rd (Contd from 11/05/90) 1 III. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS IV. AWARD OF BIDS * A. Collection of Garbage/Refuse from City properties * B. Skid Steer Loader with Attachments * C. Fuel Monitoring'System * D. Tractor - Braemar Golf Course * E. 50th and France Seasonal Banners V. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Approval of Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of November 13, 1990 B. Recommendation. - Community Health Services Advisory Committee C. Proposal - Metro Relations, Inc. D. Strong Beer - Edina Chamber of Commerce E. Tax Forfeited Lands * F. Set Hearing Date - Board of Review * G. 1991 Council Meeting Dates t Agenda Edina City Council November 19, 1990 Page 2 VI. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES VII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL VIII. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS A. Fairview Southdale Detox Center B. MLC Host Breakfast - 12/05/90 C. Wildlife Committee IX. FINANCE * A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated- 11/19/90: Total $784,811.10 and confirmation of payment of Claims dated 10/31/90: Total $1,315,736.25 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Tues Nov, 20 Truth in Taxation Budget Hearing 5:00 p.m. Council Room Thurs Nov 29 Reconvened Truth in Taxation Budget Hearing 5:00`p.m. Council Room (If needed) -. Nov 22 and 23 THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY - City Hall Closed Mon Nov 26 Futures Commission Presentation 5:00 p.m. Arneson Acres Tues Nov 27 LMC Policy Adoption Meeting 9:00 p.m. Hotel Sofitel Mon Dec 3 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Mon Dec 17 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room MINUTES - EDINA- HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AU'PHOBITY NOVEMBER 5, 1990 Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Paulus-, Rice, Smith and Chairman Richards. MINUTES of the HRA Meeting of October 15, 1990, were approved as submitted by motion of Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. AWARD OF BID FOR CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK — SITE FURNISHINGS CONTINUED TO 11/19/90 Commissioner moved to continue award of bid for Centennial Lakes Park - Site Furnishings to November 19, 1990. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Rice. Ayes > - Kelly, Paulus, Rice,.Smith, Richards Motion carried. BID AWARDED FOR CENTENNIAL LAKES PHASE IV - HOUSING PUBLIC S Commissioner Smith moved to award the following bids for Centennial Lakes Phase IV, Stage I of the Residential Amenities for buildings 4, 5 and 6: Walkway R.W. Compton, Inc. (low bidder) $11,880.00 Fountain Olympic Pools, Inc. (sole bidder) 8,675.00 Utilities Brown.& Cris, Inc. 42,889.00 Landscaping Minnesota Valley Landscape, Inc. 52,489.50 Electrical Master Electric, Inc. 16,579.00 Motion was seconded by Commissioner Rice. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. REPORT GIVEN ON EAST EDINA HOUSING FOUNDATION ACTION REGARDING SECOND MORTGAGES ON CENTENNIAL LAKES CONDOMINIUMS Executive Director Gordon Hughes referred to a letter dated October 31, 1990 from Thomas S. Erickson, counsel, to the HRA Commissioners regarding the Centennial Lakes Condominiums. Specifically, the letter noted that certain requirements are imposed by the Redevelopment Contract on how much of a second mortgage can'be given to any buyer. One of those requirements states that no second mortgage shall be given for any unit which has a gross sales price of over $90,000. This restriction was requested by the Developer for the purpose of giving concrete and objective guidelines as to the use of second mortgage funds. At a meeting with the Foundation Board of Directors on October 29, 1990, the Developer requested relief from the $90,000 cap on sale prices for two reasons: 1) Centennial Lakes Condominiums have fourteen different floor plans to choose from and the cap would restrict the ability of a buyer to choose among the plans. 2) The cost of construction of the units has gone up and relief from the cap would take into account price increases. The Foundation Board agreed to the removal of the $90,000 restriction because (i) it was not imposed nor found to be needed at Edinborough and was imposed at Centennial Lakes at the request of the developer who now requests relief therefrom, (ii) the requirement still exists that second mortgage funds go only to Moderate Income Purchasers, (iii) the requirement still exists that,80% of all units in each condominium development be sold to Moderate Income Purchasers, (iv) therefore, the main result from removing the $90,000 cap would be to allow Moderate Income Purchasers to have a greater range of.floor plans from which to choose and to allow some sales to be made which otherwise would not be made. The Board also decided to impose a new restriction which would prohibit the giving of any second mortgages to any buyer or buyers whose adjusted gross income exceeds 90% of the Median Family Income. The.Board imposed that limitation to insure that the second mortgage funds would be made available only to those who could use it most. The Developer agreed to this new limitation. Director Hughes concluded that there is no action the HRA needs to take relative to the Board's action and that the report was to advise the Commissioners of the removal of the cap. < There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, motion of Commissioner Smith for adjournment.uas seconded by Commissioner Rice. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. Executive Director tit 0 P R O C L A M A T I O N WHEREAS: .there ai'Le mote than 100,000 Minnesotans with some 6otm o6 ep c teps y; and WHEREAS, epce.epsy i.6 the second most common neutotog.ic.ae. di. 6unction of phys.icaP , .cmpa'AMent, not a d.i s ears e but a diz otdet o6 the nervous system; and WHEREAS, sixty peAcent o6 those peuon,d ,who have epiiepay ate eteinentaty 6choot chitdten of youngQtc which iz apptoximateiy one chie.d in eveAy second cea5stoom; and WHEREAS, eatty diagnosis and attention to the soc<.a2 and neutotog.icat aspects 66 epilepsy wiU a66otd people betttet conttot; and WHEREAS, there continues to be a need Got .i.mptoved education and mote .in�otmati"on tegaAding pubti"c attitudes toward undetustanding and accepting ,those pPtusons with epite0y. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that I, Ftedet.ick.S. Richatds, Mayot o6 the City o6 Edina, do hereby ptoceaim the month o6 Novembet ass EPILEPSY- MONTH IN THE CITY OF EDINA and encounag e the tes.idents o6 out City to .inctcea,s e theit awateness o6 the needs o6 .those who have epiieps y. Ftedet.ick S. R.ichotds, Mayor A. o REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To. KENNETH ROSLAND From. CRAIG LARSEN Date. NOVEMBER 19, 1990 Subject: SECOND READING ORDINANC NO. 825 A TEMPORARY CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR HOME OCCUPATIONS BY HANDICAPPED RFSTTIFNTR Recommendation: Agenda Item # TT • A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA (� To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution 0 Ordinance ❑ Discussion Approve second reading of attached Zoning Ordinance Amendment. Info /Background Attached is the revised ordinance amendment for Conditional Use Permits for handicapped residents. Changes from first reading are underlined. The ordinance has been revised to provide for City Council review after one year and thereafter every second year. The ordinance provides for a review and not renewal. The Council would review to determine if conditions of the permit are being observed. If they are not, the Council could order a (evocation of the permit. We have eliminated the word renew because it conflicts with language in the State Statute. Presently the amendment provides for permits by residents who are "physically unable to be fully employed" outside the residence. We would suggest this phrase be changed to read "unable to be employed full time outside one's residence." This phrase is more definite and more easily understood." Tom Erickson's comments on the proposed changes is attached. DOBSEY & ,WHITNEY A Pea E"HIP INCLUDING PNGISSSIONAL COR-ONS 350 PARE AVENUE 2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST 340 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022 (212)415 -9200 '.MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 33903 MIN ESO (5R, 1330 CONNECTICUT AVENUE, N. W. 612) 340 -2600 315 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING WASHINGTON, D. C. 20036 .2003 (202) 857 -0700 TELEX 29 -0603 WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 -, FAX (612)340 -2868 (612)475 -0373 3 GRACECHURCH STREET LONDON 9 OAT, ENGLAND 1200 FIRST INTERSTATE CENTER 01-92 9-3334 BILLINGS, MONTANA 59103 (406)252 -3800 36, RUE TRONCRET THOMAS S. ERICKSON 750 PARIS, FRANCS (612) 340- 201 DAVIDSON BUILDING O1- I -42- 66-59-49 GREAT PALLS, MONTANA 59401 (406)727 -3632 FAR EAST FINANCE CENTER 127 EAST FRONT STREET HONG HONG MISSOULA, MONTANA 59802 852 -5- 6612555 (406)721 -6025 November 8, 1990 City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Attention: Mr. Craig Larsen, City Planner Re: Ordinance No. 825 -A Conditional Use Permits for Home Occupations by Handicapped Residents Dear Craig: Enclosed is the revision of the above- referenced Ordinance. The revisions are based upon the discussion at the Council meeting of November 5, 1990, and our subsequent discussions. My revisions are blacklined for your reviewing convenience. , review the Ordinance and give me your comments. In connection with you review please note the following: 1. The ordinance number will have to be inserted. I understand you will get that number from the City Clerk. 2. The sentence added at the end of the "Purpose" paragraph was requested by Mr. Smith to- make it clear that handicapped persons did not have to go through the conditional use permit process if they otherwise complied with the customary home occupation conditions. 3. Paragraph 4(c), relating to conditions, and paragraph 5, relating to review of permits, have been entirely rewritten. You will note that paragraph 5 does not now provide for expiration and renewal of the permit, but instead provides that the Council shall review each permit periodically to see if the conditions under which that permit was given are still bring complied with. If they are not being DORSEY & WHITNEY Mr. Craig Larsen November 8; 1990 Page 2 ° complied with, then the Council may direct City Manager to proceed with revocation of the permit pursuant to ,the provisions of ,paragraph Hof Section 4 of the Ordinance. Paragraph H provides that notice is given to the violators and they have a time stated in the notice, to cure any violation. If it is not cured, the matter is submitted to the City Council for hearing and the Council may, at such hearing or continuation thereof, revoke the permit. I have set this paragraph up in this manner because the statute relating to conditional use permits (Minn. Stat., § 462.3595) recites that the duration of'a permit shall be "as long as the conditions agreed upon are observed, ...." The provisions of paragraph 5, as I have revised it, therefore, complies with the statute in tying the duration to specific conditions but also gives the Council a specific opportunity (in addition to the hearing in connection. with a violation) to review the conditions and to, act if there is a violation. I trust this procedure will be found acceptable by the Council. There is one other matter that I do wish to discuss. We had previously conferred on what the meaning is of the phrase "fully employed" as recommended by the Planning Commission. That phrase is troubling because it lacks clarity and definitiveness. You initially had in the ordinance the phrase "unable to be employed fulltime outside one's residence." That phrase, in my opinion, has a more definitive meaning, and we could even define it further in the ordinance to mean, for example, at least 35 hours of work per week outside of the home. I .recommend that ,such a change be made in the ordinance. Once you have reviewed the Ordinance, if you have any questions or comments,. or changes to be made, please let me know. Very truly yours, Thomas S. Erickson TSE:kks Enclosure cc: Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland; City Manager '-VCtcltltned 1014o ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825) TO PROVIDE FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS TO ALLOW CERTAIN HOME OCCUPATIONS BY HANDICAPPED RESIDENTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Paragraph D (Customary Home Occupations as an Accessory Use) of Section 7 (General Requirements Applicable to All Districts Except As Otherwise Stated) of Ordinance No. 825 is hereby amended by adding a new subparagraph as follows: "4. Permitted customary home occupations by residents who are physically unable to be fully employed outside their residence may be allowed as a temporary conditional use,, with variances from the conditions of subparagraph 1 of this paragraph D, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph I of Section 4 (Administration and Procedures) of this ordinance." Seca 2. Section 4 (Administration and Procedures) is hereby amended by adding a new paragraph I as follows: "I. Temporary Conditional Use Permits. 1. PurRose. The purpose of temporary conditional use permits is to allow handicapped residents of dwelling units to conduct and operate permitted customary home occupations in their residence.by means of such variances from the conditions otherwise imposed by this ordinance on such occupation as the Council deems necessary and appropriate to allow such persons to, properly conduct and operate such occupation from their residence. The Council hereby finds and determines that it is in the best interests of the City and its citizens to provide a process and means by which handicapped persons can carry on home occupations from their residence and thereby become or remain productive and gainfully employe and that the granting of conditional use permits pursuant to this paragrap I will promote the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City, and its citizens. However, handicapped residents who do not need variances from conditions imposed by this ordinance on customary home occupations need not, and are not required to, obtain a conditional use permit pursuant to this paragraph I. 2. Conditional Use Provisions Apply. All the provisions of paragraphs D and H of this Section 4 relative to the issuance of conditional permits shall apply to temporary conditional use permits issued pursuant to this paragraph I, except as specifically changed by this paragraph I. 3. AQplications and Notice. (a) 'An application for a temporary conditional use permit may be initiated by the occupant of the residence from which the home occupation is to be conducted, whether such occupant is an owner or a lessee of the residence. (b) The application for a temporary conditional use permit shall be accompanied by the following additional information: (i) a letter (which shall be dated riot earlier than 30 days prior to the date of the application) from the applicant's attending physician (who shall-be duly licensed to practice medicine in Minnesota) certifying that the applicant is physically unable to be fully employed outside of the applicant's residence; (ii) the specific home occupation proposed by the applicant, including the expected number of weekly automobile trips to the dwelling unit by individuals other than the residents thereof expected to be generated by the home occupation, the number of hours per day and the number of days per week the home occupation will operate; (iii) any proposed interior or exterior alterations to the dwelling unit necessary due to the proposed home occupation; and (iv) any other information required, in the' opinion of the Planner, to evaluate the application, to determine consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, and to insure compliance with the requirements contained in this ordinance and other applicable City ordinances. (c) The erection of a sign shall not be required in connection with the application for a temporary conditional use permit. (d) Notice of hearing before the Council shall be published and mailed as provided in subparagraph 5 of paragraph D of this Section 4 except that mailed notice shall be given only to owners of property situated wholly or partly within 350 feet of the property to which the. application relates. 2 4. Conditions and Findings. (a) In order to grant a temporary conditional use permit, the Council must make the same findings as set forth in subparagraph 5 of paragraph D of this Section 4. (b) In order to grant a temporary conditional use. permit, the Council must also find that the proposed home occupation complies with the conditions of subparagraph 1 of paragraph D of Section 7 of this ordinance, provided, however, that: (i) the Council may grant a variance of any condition in subparagraph 1. of paragraph D of said Section 7, if deemed necessary by the Council to permit the applicants to properly operate and conduct the proposed home occupation and if the Council finds that such use will not negate or violate any of the findings to be made pursuant to subparagraph 5 of paragraph D of this Section 4; (ii) the maximum number of automobile trips to the dwelling unit of the applicant by individuals other than the residents thereof generated as a result of such home occupation may be increased by the Council from ten per week to a maximum of twenty per week in connection with the granting of such permit. (c) Any permit granted pursuant to this paragraph IAshall remain in effect, if not earlier terminated under other provisions of this ordinance, only so long as the following conditions are observed and complied with: 0) that the applicants occupy the dwelling unit described in the permit, and then only so long as such applicants are \ physically unable to be fully employed outside of the applicant's residence; (ii) that the findings made by the Council as set forth in subparagraph 5 of paragraph D of this Section 4 continue without change or violation; and (iii) that the conditions of subparagraph 1 of paragraph D of Section 7 of this ordinance, as varied by variances granted by the Council, are not violated. 3 5. Duration and Review of Permits. (a) Each permit issued pursuant to this paragraph I shall remain in effect only so long as the conditions set out in subparagraph 4(c) of this paragraph I are observed and not violated. (b) The Council shall review each permit issued pursuant to this paragraph I on the first anniversary of the effective date of the permit and on each second anniversary (i.e., every other year) of such effective date thereafter to determine if any of such conditions are not being observed or are being violated. Such review shall be made at a public hearing, notice of which shall be published and mailed in the same manner as notice would then be given under this ordinance for a then new conditional use permit. All persons may be heard, and the Council shall receive such evidence and information as it deems necessary or desirable, orally and in writing, at such hearing and continuations thereof. If, at such hearing, or a continuation thereof, the Council concludes, by resolution, that one or more of the conditions set out in subparagraph 4(c) of this paragraph I are not being observed or are being violated, then the Council may direct the Manager to institute proceedings to revoke the permit as provided in paragraph H of this Section 4. The foregoing provisions shall not prevent the City from exercising any remedies for violations of any conditions applicable to any conditional use permit whenever they occur. 6. All Districts. Customary home occupations conducted pursuant to temporary conditional use permits issued under this paragraph I shall be allowed as a conditional use in all districts in which dwelling units are allowed." 4 Sec. 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published in the Edina Sun - Current on Attest: Clerk 5 Mayor r �! c� o ef.., 71 n �y REPORT/RECOMMENDATION \\ q do To: KENNETH ROSLAND Agenda Item # II . B From: CRAIG LARSEN Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: NOVEMBER 19, 1990 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: ORDINANCE NO. 171-A To Council FEE FOR TEMPORARY USE PERMITS. Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adopt Ordinance and waive second reading. Info /Background The attached ordinance provides for a $75.00 application fee for Temporary Conditional Use Permits for handicapped residents. i c ORDINANCE NO. 171 -A AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 171 TO ADD FEE FOR TEMPORARY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Schedule A to Ordinance No. 171 is hereby amended by adding the following thereto: ORD. SEC.' NO. NO. PURPOSE OF FEE /CHARGE AMOUNT FEE PD. 825 4(E)l Temporary Conditional $75.00 29f -a Use Permit Section 2. This ordinance shall be.in full force and effect immediately upon its passage and publication. ATTEST: /s/ MARCELLA M. DAEHN City Clerk /s/ Frederick S. Richards Mayor e A. o e ch REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: KENNETH ROSLAND From: CRAIG LARSEN Date: NOVEMBER 19, 1990 Subject: 5 -90 -6, PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL, FARRELL ADDITION. 5700 BLAKE ROAD. Recommendation: Agenda Item # u_--c . Consent F7 Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion The Planning Commission recommends denial of the three lot preliminary plat. The Planning Commission considered the proposed subdivision at two meetings and has considered three different approaches to the preliminary plat. August 29, 1990, Planning Commission Meeting. The preliminary plat was originally proposed as a three lot plat with new lot lines generally running in a east -west direction. The staff report was written on the three lot proposal. However, at the Planning Commission meeting the Farewells presented a revised two lot plat which eliminated the northerly lot. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the revised two lot preliminary plat. September 26, 1990, Planning Commission Meeting. The Farrells chose not to proceed to City Council with the approved two lot plat. Instead they decided to return to the Commission with a revised three lot subdivision. The revised three lot plat left the proposed new lot -south of the existing home essentially the same as the earlier proposal. The northerly portion of the proposed plat M was now divided east west as opposed to north south as in the earlier three lot preliminary plat. This change would allow for a larger front setback from South Knoll Drive on Lot 2. The three existing homes that front on this block of South Knoll have an average setback of 127 feet. The Planning Commission voted by a 5 to 4 margin to recommend denial of the revised three lot plat. The lot width variances required for-lots one and three and the possibility of a need for a, front setback variance on Lot 2 were given as reasons. The Farrells have decided to proceed to the Council and ask for approval of the revised three lot plat. Full size copies are attached. Size/Area Comparison 500 Foot Neighborhood (45 lots) Lot,Width Lot Depth Lot Area Lot 1 126* 240, 32,300 Lot 2 130 205 26,700 Lot 3 108* 273 36,700 *Lots one and three require a lot width variance. All of the lots comply with or exceed all other size requirements. Included in this packet is a copy of all correspondence received including correspondence received from James Van Valkenburg who is representing. the Farrells. ml no ._l-„I: 0 ol0q,lm d to] ; m►',I. \- . , . - M_U ► . .. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 S -90 -6 Preliminary Plat Approval, Farrells Parkwood Knolls, 5700 Blake Road The Commission will recall that it recommended approval of a two lot subdivision of the, subject property at its last meeting. Originally proposed as a three lot plat, it was modified to two at, the 'meeting. The proponent's have elected to return to the Commission and propose a revised three lot plat. Dimensions of,Lots in the revised preliminary plat are: Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot Width 126 s.f. 130 s.f. 110 s.f. Lot Depth 240 s.f. 205 s.f. 273 s.f. .Lot Area 32,500 s.f. 26,500 s.f.' 36,700 s.f. Lots 1 and 3 require a lot width variance from the median average for the 500 foot neighborhood. All three lots exceed all other standards including lot width to perimeter ratio. The revised plat .,also provides an increased lot width for all three lots. Recommendation: Staff concern is not with the size of the proposed lots. Our concern is the manner in which Lot ,2 would be developed. The revised plat insures that the house will be developed with maximum separation from the existing home on South Knoll Drive. Development of this lot will require a front and probably a side street variance.. The need for a variance may insure the best protection for the next door neighbor and the City. DRAFT MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 S -90 -6 Preliminary Plat Approval, Farrells Parkwood Knolls, 5700 Blake Road Mr. Larsen asked the Commission to recall they recommended approval of a two lot subdivision of the subject property at its last meeting. Originally proposed as a three lot plat, it was modified to two at the meeting. Mr. Larsen added the proponent's have elected to return to the Commission and propose a revised three lot plat. Mr. Larsen concluded that staff concern is not with the size of the proposed lots, but the manner in which Lot 2 would be developed. He explained the revised plat insures that the house will be developed with maximum separation from the existing home on South Knoll Drive. Mr. Larsen indicated development of this lot will require a front and probably a side street variance. Mr. Larsen pointed out the need for variances may be a positive since it .allows the City more control over the development of the lot. The proponents, Mr. and Mrs. Farrell were present. Mr. Wurst, 6205 South Knoll Drive an interested neighbor was present. Commissioner L. Johnson questioned Mr. Larsen on the probability of a side street setback variance being needed for Lot 2. Mr. Larsen explained a corner lot in certain instances has to maintain two front yard setbacks. This property must maintain setbacks from Blake Road as well as South Knoll Drive. Mr. Farrell told the Commission during the last meeting his proposal was heard after a very long, emotional hearing regarding home occupations. He explained he was very tired and his revised proposal from three lots to two lots was made very late which caused confusion for the Planning Commission and for him. He reminded the Commission the reason for a change to the original plat was to accommodate concerns expressed by his neighbor, Mr. Wurst. Continuing, he said he indicated at the past meeting that he supported placement of a conservation easement on one of the two lots. Mr. Farrell told the Commission at that time, and at present, he is unclear on where or what the conservation easement would be. Mr. Farrell noted all he wants is to build a new house for his family on proposed Lot.3. Mr. Farrell stated he believes the proposal as presented would increase the value of the neighbors homes and be a plus for the entire area. If he sold his property this issue would, in reality, come, up again, and the proposed three lot subdivision affords a measure of control over development. Mr. Farrell concluded that the building pads located on the proposed plat are indicated as required -by the-new ordinance. They are not set in concrete, there is room for redesign and a change to what has been illustrated. Mr. Wurst indicated he was confused. He said he thought this matter was settled with a two lot subdivision. He told the Commission if a three lot subdivision is approved the new house would harm his. property due to the decreased setback from South Knoll. He pointed out the proposed building pad depicts a front yard setback that is less than the three homes located on the block. He added if a house were allowed to be developed, when he walks out his front door he would see the rear, or at the very least, the side of the proposed new house. He added he feels it is not aesthetically pleasing, and not appropriate for a home to be constructed in front of other homes. Mr. Wurst added another concern of his is that he did not receive re- notice of the change to the Farrells plat. Mr. Farrell pointed out that a three lot subdivision would create three new lots that are respectively numbers 4, 5, and 9 in size within the entire 500 foot neighborhood radious. He added the variance process would afford protection by locating the proposed home on Lot 2 in the proper, place. Regarding notifying the neighbors, Mr. Farrell said renotification was not needed because what is presented this evening is a three lot subdivision very similar to what was originally proposed, and notified for. Mr. Wurst pointed out the elevations of the Farrell - property should be taken into consideration when the property is being studied for subdivision. He said the drop in elevations is substantial and the height of the proposed new house would be a concern. Mr. Wurst questioned the hardship in supporting a three lot subdivision versus the approved two lot subdivision that would not require any variances. Commissioner L. Johnson told the Commission he felt this was a "done 'deal". He pointed out the proposal this evening is different from what was approved and maybe re- notification should have occurred. Commissioner L. Johnson continued that he felt the conservation easement or scenic easement ran along the north portion of the new lot on the South Knoll side of the property. Commissioner; Palmer said when he first reviewed the plans submitted and visited the site he observed what he felt were problems with a three lot subdivision. He added when he learned the proponents withdrew their request for a three lot subdivision and submitted a revised plan at the Commission meeting illustrating two lots instead of the proposed three he was delighted. He said he has a problem supporting the three lot proposal when he finds no hardship And a variance is required. Commissioner McClelland reminded the Commission at the last meeting it was suggested that the proponent's consider dividing the proposal north and south. She added the proponents should not be penalized for not understanding what happened at the last meeting. This issue was heard after a emotional lengthy hearing and the confusion that occurred resulting from their change in plans is something that should be recognized. Mr. Larsen responded to the question and confusion regarding notices. He reminded the Commission the Planning Commission is a public meeting,, not a public hearing. A public hearing requires notification, a public meeting does not. He explained a condition of the newly adopted subdivision ordinance states that properties within 500 feet of the property in question are to be notified that a process for subdivision has commenced 10 days before the request is heard by the Planning Commission. This .requirement has been fulfilled at the Commission level as the Farrells are technically in the subdivision process. Mr. Larsen in responding to the questions regarding hardship added if a lot is approved with the knowledge of a variance being needed, a hardship is recognized. Commissioner McClelland pointed out the proponent is only two feet short of what is stipulated by ordinance and the variance request on the lot in question would be minimal. She stressed that the proponents expressed they had no clear understanding of what occurred at the Commission meeting and no understanding of what they agreed to. She commented she felt some consideration should be given to the proponents and added she finds it surprising some members are having difficulty in approving a three lot subdivision that may need a slight variance. Commissioner Runyan suggested that the issue of a two lot subdivision versus three lot subdivision may exist with the alignment of the proposed three lots, the topography, placement of the existing house, curb cuts, and conservation concerns, not just if or if not variances are needed. Commissioner Faust said she feels the lot in question is large enough to accommodate three lots. She pointed out Edina is an urban city and Mr. Wursts concern regarding viewing a house out of his front yard is something that occurs within a City environment. Commissioner Faust pointed out the newly proposed lots, are well within the median range of lot size, and in fact are larger than most lots within the area. Commissioner Byron said the issue of notices not being mailed in a sense is a mute point. He reminded the Commission at the last meeting action was taken on a proposal that was different than what was presented and no new notices were mailed. He said in his opinion he believes the notice requirement at the Commission level has been satisfied. Commissioner Byron noted at this meeting, whatever is decided, the outcome should be clear to the proponent and the Commission. Continuing he added he believes if a three lot subdivision is approved the issue of house placement can be dealt with adequately through the variance procedure. Chairman Johnson said acting as "devil's advocate" inquired if a lot is allowed to be created, is the ' Commission signaling it is buildable? Commissioner McClelland said she believes a variance may not be needed on Lot 2. The building pad depicted on the plat. for Lot 2 could be moved back farther, therefore not requiring a variance. Mr. Farrell reminded the Commission the subdivision process requires that a building pad be illustrated on preliminary plats. Mr. Farrell said he believes the building pad for Lot 2 has been located in the best place. Mr. Farrell submitted to the Commission an aerial for them to review. Chairman' Johnson clarified what in his opinion is at issue. He said it comes down to if the Commission feels three lots are an appropriate use of the land and if three lots are approved, if needed,'the variance procedure,would be implemented. Commissioner Workinger questioned if it is possible to place a home on Lot 2 without a variance. A discussion ensued with the Commission observing that the building pad located on Lot 2 could be moved back farther, but if that would be the case the rear yard would be minimal. Commissioner L. Johnson asked the Mr. Farrell if he would favor a conservation easement on the north part of Lot 1? Mr. Farrell said he would not be opposed to a conservation easement along the north part of Lot 1 if a driveway could be constructed through it. A question was 'brought up if a conservation easement could be violated by a driveway. Mr. Larsen responded that an easement could be drafted to accommodate that, but usually property in a conservation easement is to remain untouched. Mr. Wurst pointed out if Lot 2is considered a buildable lot there would be no way to prevent the house from being developed the way it is depicted on the proposed plat. He stressed there are three houses right in line along South Knoll and it would be bad planning. and an unwanted precedent to approve a front yard setback variance. Commissioner Faust reminded Mr. Wurst the variance board has control in house placement and would recommend that a house placed on proposed Lot 2 be located in the least obtrusive place. Commissioner McClelland agreed with Commissioner Faust and told Mr. Wurst the subdivision is a logical north /south division and it is unrealistic to think this property will not be developed. Mr. Wurst said the proposed division may be logical.but it is not right. He pointed out every other property along South Knoll had to maintain the established front yard setback and this property should also. He reminded Commission the other properties had to fall in line with the Farrell house which was the first house on the block. Commissioner McClelland said the proponent has the right to develop. She said the confusion seems to be with setbacks and not if the lot is buildable. Commissioner McClelland said the lot in question is buildable. Commissioner Ingwalson questioned if the lot in question is to be properly developed would house placement violate the front yard setbacks that have been established. along South Knoll. Continuing, Commission Ingwalson said if that is the case he cannot support this division. He reminded the Commission they previously decided in the Belfry case on Grimes Avenue that the neighborhood was the special 4200 block along Grimes .even though the proposed lot met all the standards of the 500 foot neighborhood. Commissioner Ingwalson added maybe this case should be decided on those same merits. The property in question is in a unique location where properties on the block have substantial setbacks. Commissioner Ingwalson told the Commission that is the reason they must be careful. If they say this lot is buildable, and in reality the property cannot be developed without violating the setbacks and needing a variance that may be a problem. Mr. Wurst said the property in question occupies a unique spot in the development of South Knoll. Mr..Wurst pointed out this side of the street is special, the front yard setbacks are all large and the lots sizes are large. He added he paid a high price for this layout and asked the Commission not to violate it by approving a three lot subdivision and would create a Lot that would have to be developed with a house that would violate the streetscape. Commissioner L. Johnson said if this is to be viewed as a three lot subdivision, two of the lots do not meet the ordinance, the third as shown with the building pad requires a variance. Commissioner L. Johnson said if the Commission is to assume that the building pad depicted on Lot 2 is not present and that building pad is moved back to correspond with the established front yard setbacks would the Commission approve a lot with only a 20 or 30 foot rear yard. Commissioner L. Johnson said he believes all three lots require some type of variance. Commissioner Runyan said what is confusing to him is that the Commission usually has been concerned with neighborhood character and the protecting of neighborhood symmetry. Commissioner Runyan said in his opinion, maintaining symmetry is not present in this layout. He pointed out there is an established front yard setback on this block, and we should not recommend violation of that setback. Commissioner Runyan indicated in almost all cases the variance board has denied front yard setback 'requests. He acknowledged that the property in question has dense vegetation and the existing house is not very visible from the street but cautioned that vegetation should not be confused as screening, thereby making, subdivision attractive because potential houses may not be visible from the street. Commissioner Faust suggested that the subdivision be approved and the variance question be addressed by the variance board. She asked if the Commission approves development of Lot 2 can we recommend that the house meets the setback requirements, and if it can't, the lot is non - buildable. Commissioner McClelland said she believes a three lot subdivision works well with this property, and pointed out if variances are needed they are minimal. A discussion ensued on the placement of proposed houses and the setbacks along South Knoll Drive. Commissioner L. Johnson questioned if there would still be one driveway on Blake Road, the proposed plat shows two driveways. Mr. Larsen said it is his understanding that only one driveway would serve Blake Road. Commissioner L. Johnson said the topography may make it necessary for two driveways to be developed. The driveways could be developed in such a way that there would be only one curb cut with the driveways branching off to individual properties. Mr. Larsen said what is depicted is just conceptual and there is room for redesign. Mr. Larsen said what the Commission needs to do is to either rescind their previous action for approval of the two lot subdivision or keep it as recommended, and vote on either approving or denying the revised plan presented this evening. Commissioner Palmer moved to recommend that the proposed three lot subdivision be denied on the grounds that the three proposed lots do not work well, if approved, the proposed house on Lot 2 would create an awkward situation for development, either by violating the front yard setback or pushing the proposed house so far back that the rear yard becomes compromised. Commissioner Runyan seconded the motion. Commissioner Byron said he believes this request should be decided on the merits of the subdivision process, not on if, or if not, a variance may be required on Lot 2, or any of the proposed lots. The concern over variances, if any'are needed, would then be heard by the Board of Appeals and Adjustments. Commissioner Palmer in response to Commissioner Byron said he understands his position, but believes the. Commission is not required to approve a subdivision just because variances are not needed. He added other issues come into play, such as topography, symmetry, neighborhood character, etc. Upon Roll Call Vote: Faust; Nay L. Johnson; Aye McClelland, Nay Runyan; Aye Palmer; Aye Workinger;Aye Ingwalson; Aye Byron; Nay Johnson; Nay Motion carried. 5 -4. Chairman Johnson clarified for Mr. Farrell and Mr. Worst that what has occurred this evening is. that the proposed three lot subdivision request will go to the Council with a recommendation for denial on a 5 -4 vote. The Council will also receive the minutes of the August 29, 1990, Commission meeting in which the Commission. recommended approval of a two lot subdivision request with a conservation easement along the north along South Knoll. Mr. Larsen added that he felt the conservation easement included Lot 1 of the original three lot proposal. Y COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AUGUST 29, 1990 S -90 -6 Preliminary Plat Approval Farrell1d Parkwood Knolls James and Linda Farrell 5700 Blake Road The subject property is a developed single family lot containing an area of 95,700 square feet, or 2.2 acres. The'existing dwelling is located in the central portion of the lot. The proposed subdivision.would create two new lots plus a lot for the existing dwelling. The proposed lot dimensions and sizes are: Lot Width Lot Depth Lot Area Lot width to perimeter ratio Lot 1 117 feet 256 feet 30,100 s.f. 0.16 Lot 2 102 feet 256 feet 30,100 s.f. 0.13 Lot 3 108 feet 273 feet 35,500 s.f. 0.14 Characteristics of the' 45 lots in the 500 foot neighborhood "are as follows: Median Lot Width 130 feet Median Lot Depth 149 feet Median Lot Area 20,000'square feet The proposed lots fall between 13 and 28 below the lot width standard. - Thus, a lot width variance is required for each lot. The-lots all exceed the neighborhood standard for lot depth and lot area. Also, all of the lots meet the lot width to perimeter ratio requirement. Development of lots 1 and 3 would require removing approximately 33 trees on this heavily wooded site. Approximately 22% of the total site area contains slopes of 18% or greater. Development would impact 15% of these sloped areas. The Subdivision Ordinance requires a conservation easement 100 feet upland from the ordinary high water elevation of a lake, stream or pond. Such an easement would be required for the proposed Lot 3. The house foot print illustrated on Lot 3 encroaches on this easement area. Recommendation: The proposed lots are relatively large. They are larger than most recent Parkwood Knolls lots. They are also generally larger than lots on the east side of Blake Road. They are, however, not as wide as lots in the older Parkwood Knolls plats which abut the property on the west and north. Staff does have some specific concerns relative to the development of lots .1 and 3. First, any development of Lot 1 will require a variance because of the large setbacks maintained by the homes to the west and to the south. This is probably a plus. The variance process will ensure that the property is developed with the least impact on adjacent homes. The house foot print on Lot 3 encroaches on the required 100 foot easement area. Staff would not favor reducing this requirement. Staff would recommend preliminary approval with the requested lot width variances subject to: 1. Final Plat Approval 2. Recorded 100 foot conservation easement 3. Subdivision Dedication 4. Utility connection charges . e S -90 -6 Preliminary Plat Approval Farrell's Parkwood Knolls �X James and Linda Farrell �,- - 5700 Blake Road Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the subject property is a developed single family lot containing an area of 95,700 square feet, or 2.2 acres. The existing dwelling is 'located in the central portion of the lot. Mr. Larsen pointed out before them this evening is a revision to the plan previously submitted. The revised plan depicts two lots instead of the proposed three lots. Mr. Larsen concluded staff would recommend preliminary approval subject to: 1. Final Plat Approval 2. Recorded 100 foot conservation easement 12 3. Subdivision Dedication 4. Utility connection charges Mr. and Mrs. Farrell were present and their surveyor Randy Stern was present. Interested.residents were also present. Commissioner Hale questioned if the driveway for the existing house would stay. Mr. Larsen responded that the driveway for the existing house cuts across the property line for the proposed new lot. Staff would assume that a modification would occur resulting in a small portion of the driveway being shared and.then breaking off, continuing to the new proposed house site. This could be realized with a driveway easement. Mr. Larsen said staff would support this easement because it is important keep the number of curb cuts on Blake Road to a minimum. This shared drive approach would also reduce disruption to the terrain. Commissioner L. Johnson asked if the Engineering Department has reviewed the utility services. Mr. Larsen answered that the Engineering Department has reviewed the water services. He added the Engineering Department is recommending a minor change to the sanitary sewer and how it is handled to Blake Road, thereby avoiding any disruption to the new street. The Engineering Department believes this would be easy to accomplish. Commissioner L. Johnson questioned if the existing house is connected to city services. Mr. Larsen acknowledged that the house at the present time has a well and is served only by a well. Mr. Larsen said it is expected if redevelopment would be approved that the existing house connect to City services. Mr. Larsen indicated they would be able to keep their well and connect to public services. Commissioner L. Johnson said disruption to this site would be vast and the impact to the topographical features would be extreme due to utility connections, steep terrains, needed fill, retaining walls, and new house and garage pads, etc., Continuing, Commissioner L. Johnson said many conditions such as a driveway easement have to be met to make this kubdivision work. Commissioner L. Johnson said maybe approval is a bit premature. Commissioner McClelland said in visiting the site she found that the houses along South Knoll are all one story ranch style homes. They are also long sprawling homes with large frontages. She suggested that the proponents might possibly consider dividing the property the other way. The lots would be at least 128 feet.wide and would not be substandard by much,. only a couple feet. She cautioned if not divided carefully there could be a setup for dividing the newly created lot in the future, and that is something the Commission should be aware could happen. Continuing,. Commissioner McClelland said what has been presented doesn't seem to fit the topography as well as it might. 13 Mr. Tom Wurst, 6205 South Knoll, said he has been working with Mr. Farrell regarding his potential subdivision. He explained his house is setback the same distance from South'-Knoll Drive as Mr. Farrell. Mr. Wurst explained that Mr. Farrell, with his revision from three lots to two lots accommodated his concerns over the three lot subdivision. He added his concerns were to preserve the wooded slopes and the topography of the area. Mr. Wurst told the Commission when looking out of his front window if three lots were approved he believes he would be looking at the rear or side of new .houses. Mr. Wurst indicated he also spoke with a realtor who said if another house were to build across the street his property values would decrease. Continuing, Mr. Wurst said Mr. Farrell has been very easy to work with and he appreciates his: revisions to the plan from three,lots to two lots. Commissioner McClelland clarified for Mr. Wurst that she has a concern that if the two lot subdivision were approved in the future the property owners of the larger. lot could petition for subdivision. Commissioner Palmer said he commends Mr. Farrell for working with the neighbors, adding he feels the Commission should not be hesitant to approve this request because in the future the newly created lot could be subdivided. Commissioner Hale asked if a conservation easement could be. attached to the new lot thereby preventing future subdivision. Mr. Larsen said that is a possibility and sends a message indicating you feel it is important to protect this area. Commissioner L. Johnson questioned if they considered dividing the property north - south. Mr. Farrell said that was considered but eliminated because of the impact to South Knoll, also he felt if the house were to be faced toward Blake more opposition would occur. Commissioner L. Johnson said his concern is with the °proposed Lot 3, now I guess Lot 2, the reduced width, retaining walls, 15% drive slope, fil, etc. He said this property could be subdivided north south with minimal problems. Mr. Farrell said couldn't the lot lines just be.moved to get the appropriate width. He pointed out the steepest slope is where the driveway is at present. Mr. Larsen said a number of different configurations were looked at and staff felt what is proposed is- workable. He added the variance request is not unrealistic and the elimination of the north lot is desirable. Commissioner Palmer said he is pleased that the north lot was eliminated and favors the subdivision as amended. He added he believes a shared driveway is favorable because in his opinion as few curb cuts on Blake Road or any road is better. Commissioner 14 Palmer also said he likes the idea presented, by Commission Hale regarding a conservation easement for Lot 3. Commissioner McClelland said her concern is with the size of Lot 1 and its potential future development. She said she either feels this whole area should be platted at one time, with three, or place a conservation easement on Lot 1. Commissioner McClelland said maybe this item should be continued to allow the proponents time to reconfigure the lots so minimal disturbance would occur. Mr. Farrell said he wanted to work with the residents in the area and also wanted to carefully create a desirable lot. He added he plans on building a new house on the lot Commissioner Palmer said what the Commission has to vote on is what is presented, which is a subdivision creating one new lot. Commissioner L. Johnson asked Mr. Farrell if he is agreeable to a conservation easement being placed on the new lot. Mr. Farrell questioned if a conservation easement would prohibit him from changing his driveway or adding a garage. Mr. Larsen clarified that if a conservation easement is placed on this lot you would have to come before the Commission with a request to reconfigure your driveway, etc. Mr. Farrell asked if this would restrict himself or a future owner from doing what they want with their property. He said he would favor the easement if it wouldn't prevent them of anyone else from doing simple changes to this lot. Commissioner Hale asked Mr. Farrell if he has spoken with neighbors to the south. Mr. Farrell said he has not spoken to all neighbors but the property owners of the doubles have no problem with what is proposed.. Commissioner Palmer moved to recommend preliminary plat approval subject to staff conditions and the further conditions that a conservation easement be placed on Lot 1 and that a common driveway be used to enter /exit the property. Commissioner Hale seconded the motion. All voted aye, motion carried. IV. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 10:50 p.m. Jackie Hoogenakker, Secretary 15 KNOLL OR /V6 Q r; X018 '89 ,all SAMITA.V ..� ma l000llso �0101. —AME JL. w. -,I •• SO KAYMAR OR .3;.. I- br.w W.wr.w _., ffxmm warts 08*v?ft loGN0111MANNIA 11016MMKOPIND ".Mom oarrw z qj L ILI I—. IT0110"Alloo AP•INN111khtVILT w• OF KON AMA WU Ill w Z, Moo" sllultlmalrw mwwlawolwa 10110111 w O.M." w I 1,40,0'a •lo► on-spur own to 0 A. .—o%om L ol"'S' L&B 6'""— N 31 :,I.= aft•k—Lo""•' LW.D oobr IN L 16 k%WM"'w-=oM- La I&sLvluwp.w Mot ma""m Me .91 Mm twea.mu"NoINK 11 L... ,mL oollAS LA.1%. 000lLM vwwW 'ii iii 8. l.", LI IN I.= Im t L&b. gy Ll LIN' = M to. Y• 0000,•000— •1. oota 'N' IoMo,om- ul am -i PFAPOM LN P••p•m im Millo Of.' go %CAL4 IN Pwa r (JTy KNOB sANM�� -- OR1VE i - -�" cis -__/$9. 00 _z9/ -_- __ -- — - �•�•,' yq,Vi 9 � • v N -- • c,/ ^ �: 52.00 -c s '—� e,P e23. � \Flo J lie -4-\911 1 �9e � II 0 I2I {t iA wpusi lS7ao o'e \r ? �• qtr `^ ` .•'� {�t, �� � r.4 Ems :. %: .. %�X:%`.Ni� 'tom �•• �`` M McD,AEV 2 tit pstaf 0 s A&L... ptff fooeo d/zj 0 ♦♦W^^ V/ W ' I tw op \. 6n LOT WIDTH TO PERWETER RATIO LOT WIDTH LOT DEPTH LOT AREA PROPOSED LOT 1 22.20% 219 256 60,200 PROPOSED LOT 2 13.80% 108 273 35,500 THOMSEN NYBECK JOHNSON BOUQUIRIT VAN VALHENBURG OHNS AD SNnn- P.A. LAW OFFICES SUITE 600, EDINBOROUGH CORPORATE CENTER EAST 3300 EDINBOROUGH WAY, MINNEAPOLIS (EDINA), MINNESOTA 55435 (612) 835 -7000 • FAX: (612) 835 -9450 GLENN O. NYBECK MARSHJ.HALBERG OF COUNSEL, GORDON V. JOHNSON WILLIAM E. SJOHOLM JACK W. CARLSON JOHN K. BOUQUET THOMAS R. KELLEY - RICHARD D. WILSON, P-4- JAMES VAN VALKENBURG DENNIS M. PATRICK HELGE THOMSEN. RETIRED MARK O. OHNSTAD PHILIP SIEFF DONALD O. SMITH DAVID J. MCGEE November 172, 1990 The Honorable Frederick Richards and Members of City Council RE: James & Linda Farrell 5700 Blake Road Dear Mayor Richards and Council'Members: NU I wrote to you about this matter on,October 17, 1990 and we have postponed this for hearing until November 19th. I would hope that you would contact the Farre111t' and visit the property so that you can better visualize what they are attempting to do 1n this lot division and platting. I am enclosing some new drawings which portray the situation a little clearer then the ones I sent before and there are a couple of changes in these drawings. First I point out to you the fact that the average lot width for the "neighborhood" lots is 126 feet, with a depth of 163 f,-,et and the lot area of 21.000. You will also -see on there the median and also the dimensions of the proposed lots that we are referring to. As you will- see,.these new lots are all substantially higher than any of the lots in the neighborhood. Incidentally. neighborhood here is construed to mean property within 500 feet of the Farrell's lot. In developing this property we are attempting to do a number of things. -2- 1. Save as many trees as possible. 2. Create -an open space easement over a good part of Lots 1 and 2 to the north of the existing house and proposed house. 3. To create a conservation easement for the 100 feet to the south which, abuts the pond. In addition we intend to create some building rests fic- tions that will govern the height, mass, and location of any home built on Lots 2 and 3 and in,particular.Lot 2.,. As to Lot 2, it is our intention to put on a restriction that would require that any home to be built would line up essentially with the two properties immediately to the west. The Wurst home which is' immediately to the west of the Farrell home by our survey is 125 feet from the lot line and the home to the west of that is 121 feet. The existing Farrell home is 137 feet. We have discussed this with several builders and they indicate that the proposed-location of a home on Lot 2 is doable. Mr. Wurst has expressed the most concern on this property development and that is the reason we are talking about open space easements and restrictions that will protect him. As a practic?1 matter we do not think that any construction here will affect him. His lot is also a heavily wooded lot. He has agreed that the construction of a home on Lot 3 would not have any effect on him. As to this drawing as opposed to the prior one .I want to state a couple of things. The proposed Lot 1 would have a frontage of 126 feet which is essentially a request for a minor variance of 4 feet.- The rear line between Lots 1, 2 and 3 has been altered to create a larger back yard for Lot 2 and to accommodate the construction of a home in that area. The Ordinance requires 130 feet in Lot 3 at a distance of 50 feet from the easterly lot line. Craig Larsen indicates that this rule is primarily to acknowledge that most people would build their home there and it needs that width. Our plan is to -3- build further south and west and thus we do not feel that that 130 feet is essential. If YOU feel it necessary we can move the line back, but our purpose in moving it is to create a bigger backyard for both Lots 1 and 2. To get the feel of this lot I do strongly urge that you contact -the Farrell's and walk the -property so that you can see the proposed -location of homes and also .a general idea as to the size of the lots. These lots -will be substantial in size and I feel will improve the lots and will obviously 'produce homes of substantial value. We are not talking about small homes here: It is our estimate that any home built on Lot 2 or 3 would be in the $400,000 range. The Farrell's plan to sell their existing home and build on Lot 3. I will be back in the office on November 16th and if there are any questions on this I would appreciate it if you would call, or if you prefer I would be happy to meet you at the property. In the meantime I wish you would contact Mr. and Mrs. Farrell: Home Mr. Farrell 938 -1618 829 -3442 I might say that we have been in contact with Mr. Wurst who has studied this situation and obviously will speak for himself at the hearing. I might say that he has been hesitant to walk the property and to deal directly with the Farrell's as he does not wish to speak with them because they are in fact represented by an attorney. That -is consistent with the Lawyers Code of Ethics. Sin /" James Van Valkenb JVV:jd ` Encl. cc: Tom Wurst P. S. Enclosed is a draft of the last Planning Commission meeting and I have highlighted some of the comments made. JVV DRAFT S -90 -6 Preliminary Plat Approval, Farrells Parkwood Knolls, 5700 Blake Road Mr. Larsen asked the Commission to recall they recommended approval of -a two lot subdivision of the subject property at its last meeting. originally proposed as a three lot plat,. it was modified to two at the meeting. Mr. Larsen added the proponent's have elected to return to the Commission and propose a revised three lot plat. Mr. Larsen concluded that staff concern is not with the size of the proposed lots, but'the manner in which Lot 2 would be developed. He explained the revised plat insures that the house will be developed with maximum separation from the existing home on South Knoll Drive. Mr. Larsen indicated development of this lot will require a front and probably a side street variance. Mr. Larsen pointed out the need for variances may,.be a positive since it allows the City more control,:- '.;over the development of the lot.. The proponents, Mr. and Mrs. Farrell were present. Mr. Wurst, 6205 South Knoll Drive an interested neighbor was present. Commissioner L. Johnson questioned Mr. Larsen on the probability of aside street setback variance being needed for Lot 2. Mr. Larsen explained a corner lot in certain instances has to maintain two front yard setbacks. This property must maintain setbacks from Blake Road as well as South Knoll Drive. Mr._ Farrell told the Commission during the last meeting his proposal was heard after a very long, emotional hearing regarding home occupations. He explained he was very tired and his revised proposal from three lots to two lots was made very late which caused confusion for the Planning Commission and for him. He reminded the Commission the reason for a change to the original plat was to accommodate concerns expressed by his neighbor, Mr. Wurst. Continuing, he said he indicated at the past meeting that he supported placement of a conservation easement on one of the two lots. Mr. Farrell told the Commission at that time, and at present, he is unclear on where or what the conservation easement would be. Mr. Farrell noted all he wants is to build a new house for his family on proposed Lot 3. Mr. Farrell stated he believes the proposal as presented would increase the value of the neighbors homes and be a plus for the entire area. If he sold his property this issue would, in reality, come up again, and the proposed three lot subdivision affords a measure of control over development. Mr. Farrell concluded that the building pads located on the proposed plat are indicated as required by the new ordinance. They are not set in concrete, there is room for redesign and a change to what has been illustrated. Mr. Wurst indicated he was confused. He said he thought this matter was settled with a two lot subdivision. He told the Commission if a three lot subdivision is approved the new house would harm his property due to the decreased setback from South Knoll. He pointed out the proposed building pad depicts a front yard setback that is less than the three homes located on the block. He added if .a house were allowed to be developed when he walks out his front door he would see the rear or at the very least the side of the- proposed new house. He added he feels it is not aesthetically pleasing and not appropriate for a home to be constructed in front of other homes. Mr. Wurst added another concern of his is that he did not receive re- notice of the change to the Farrells - plat. Mr. Farrell pointed out that a three lot subdivision would create three new lots that are respectively numbers 4, 5, and 9 in size within the entire 500 foot radius. neighborhood. He added the variance process would afford protection by locating the proposed home on Lot 2 in the proper place. Regarding notifying the neighbors, Mr. Farrell said renotification was not needed because what is presented this evening is a three lot subdivision very similar to what was originally proposed, and notified for. Mr. Wurst pointed out the elevations of the Farrell property should, be taken into consideration when the property is being studied for subdivision. He said the drop in elevations is substantial and the height of the proposed new house would be a concern. Mr. Wurst questioned the hardship in supporting a three lot subdivision versus the approved two lot subdivision that would not require any variances. Commissioner L. Johnson told the Commission he felt this was a "done deal". He pointed out the proposal this evening is different from what was approved and maybe re- notification should have occurred. Commissioner L. Johnson continued that' he felt the cpnservation easement or scenic easement ran along the north portion of the new lot on the South Knoll side.of the property. Commissioner Palmer said when he first reviewed the plans submitted and visited the site he observed what he felt were problems with a three lot subdivision. He added when he learned the proponents withdrew their request for a three lot subdivision and submitted a revised plan at the Commission meeting illustrating two lots instead of the proposed three he was delighted. He said he has a problem supporting the three lot proposal when he finds no hardship and a variance is required. Commissioner McClelland reminded the Commission at the last meeting it was suggested that the proponent's consider dividing the proposal north and south. She added the proponents should not be penalized for not understanding what happened at the last meeting. This issue .was heard after a emotional lengthy hearing and the confusion that occurred resulting from their change in plans is something that should be recognized. Mr. Larsen responded to the question and confusion regarding notices. He reminded the Commission the Planning Commission is a public meeting, not a public hearing. A public hearing requires notification, a public meeting does not. He explained a condition of the newly adopted subdivision ordinance states that: =:properties within °_5 00 -� f eet� - of :�-the7'-property"-�' in!' question,` 'are�to._,- be�notif ied ::.that. a.= process,; for subdivision hasp commenced-�10 .days . before the: request. s heard ,by -,the 'Planning CO is requirement °has been fulf ill led "attlieComirission: °level as the Farrells are technically in the subdivision process. Mr. Larsen in responding to the questions regarding hardship added if a lot is approved with the knowledge of a variance being needed, a hardship is recognized. Commissioner McClelland pointed out the proponent is only two feet short of what is stipulated by ordinance and the variance request on the lot in question would be minimal. She stressed that the proponents expressed they had no clear understanding of what occurred at the Commission meeting and no understanding of what they agreed to. She commented she felt some consideration should be given to the proponents and added she finds it surprising some members are having difficulty in approving a three lot subdivision that may need a slight variance. Commissioner Runyan suggested that the issue of a two lot subdivision versus three lot subdivision may exist with the alignment of the proposed three lots, the topography, placement of the existing house, curb cuts, and conservation concerns, not just if or if not variances are needed. Commissioner Faust said she feels the lot in question is large enough to accommodate three lots. She pointed out Edina is an urban city and Mr. Wursts concern regarding viewing a house out of his front yard is something that occurs within a City environment. Commissioner Faust pointed out the newly proposed lots are well within the median range of lot size, and in fact are larger than most lots within the area. Commissioner Byron said the issue of notices not being mailed in a sense is a mute point. He reminded the Commission at the last meeting action was taken on a proposal that was different than what was presented and no new notices were mailed. He said in his opinion he believes the notice requirement at the Commission level has been satisfied. Commissioner Byron noted at this meeting, whatever is decided, the outcome should be clear to the proponent and the Commission. Continuing he added he believes if a three lot subdivision is approved the issue of house placement can be dealt with adequately through the variance procedure. Chairman Johnson said acting as "devil's advocate" inquired if a lot is allowed to be created, is the Commission signaling it is buildable? Commissioner McClelland said she believes a variance may not be needed on Lot 2. The building pad depicted on the plat for Lot 2 could be moved back farther, therefore not requiring a variance. Mr. Farrell reminded the Commission the subdivision process requires that a building pad be illustrated on preliminary plats. Mr. Farrell said he.believes the building pad for Lot 2 has been located in the best place. Mr. Parrell submitted to the Commission an aerial for them to review. Chairman 'Johnson clarified what in his opinion 'is at issue. He said it comes down to if the Commission feels three lots are an appropriate use of the land and if three lots are approved, -if needed, the variance procedure would be implemented. Commissioner, Workinger questioned if it is possible to place a home on Lot 2 without a variance. A discussion ensued with the Commission observing that the building pad located on Lot 2 could be moved back farther, but if that would be the case the rear yard would be minimal. P Commissioner L. Johnson asked the Mr. Farrell if he would favor a conservation easement on the north part of Lot 1? Mr. Farrell said he would not be opposed to a conservation easement along the north part of Lot 1 if-- a'­driveway could be constructed through it. A question was brought up if a: ,conservation . easement . could be- violated by a driveway. Mr. Larsen responded that an easement could be drafted to accommodate that, but usually property in a conservation easement is to remain untouched. Mr. Wurst pointed out if Lot 2 is considered a buildable lot there would be no way to prevent the house from being developed the way it is depicted on the proposed plat. He stressed' there are three houses right in line along South Knoll and it would be bad planning and an unwanted precedent to approve a front yard setback. variance. Commissioner Faust reminded. Mr. Wurst the variance board has control in house placement and would recommend that a house placed on proposed Lot 2 be located in the least obtrusive place. Commissioner McClelland agreed with Commissioner Faust and told Mr. Wurst the subdivision is a logical north /south division and it is unrealistic to think this property will not be developed.' Mr. Wurst said the proposed division may be logical but it is not right. He pointed out every other property along South Knoll had to maintain the established front yard setback and this property should also. He reminded Commission the other properties had to fall in line with the Farrell house which was the first house on the block. Commissioner McClelland said the proponent has the right. to develop. She said the confusion seems to be with setbacks and not if the lot is buildable. Commissioner McClelland said the lot in question is buildable. M Commissioner Ingwalson questioned if the lot in question is to be properly developed would house placement violate the front yard setbacks that have been established along South Knoll. Continuing, Commission Ingwalson said if that is the case he cannot support this division. He reminded the Commission they previously decided in the Belfry case-on Grimes Avenue that the neighborhood was the special 4200 block along Grimes even though the proposed lot met all the standards of the 500 foot neighborhood. Commissioner Ingwalson added maybe this case should be decided on those same merits. The property in question is in a unique location where properties on the block have substantial setbacks. Commissioner Ingwalson told the, Commission that is the reason they must be careful. If they say this lot is buildable, and in reality the property cannot be developed without violating the. setbacks and needing a variance that may be a problem. Mr. Wurst said the property in question occupies a unique spot in the development of South Knoll. Mr. Wurst pointed out this side of the street is special, the front yard setbacks are all large and the lots.sizes ate large. He added he paid a high price for this layout and asked the Commission not to 'violate it by approving a three lot subdivision and would create a Lot that would have to be developed with a house that would violate the streetscape. Commissioner L., Johnson said if this is to be viewed as a three lot subdivision, two of the lots do not meet the ordinance, the third as shown with the building pad requires a variance. Commissioner L. Johnson said if the Commission is to assume that the building pad depicted on Lot 2 is not present and that building pad is moved back to correspond with the established front yard setbacks would the Commission approve a lot with only a 20 or 30 foot rear yard. Commissioner L. Johnson said he believes all three lots require some type of variance. Commissioner Runyan said what is confusing to him is that the Commission usually has been concerned with neighborhood character and the protecting of neighborhood symmetry. Commissioner Runyan said in his opinion maintaining symmetry in not present in this layout. He pointed out there is.an established.front yard setback on this block and we should not violate that setback. Commissioner Runyan indicated in almost all cases the variance board has denied front yard setback requests. He acknowledged that the property in question has dense vegetation and the existing house is not very visible from the street but cautioned that vegetation should not be confused as screening, thereby making subdivision attractive because potential houses may not be visible from the street. Commissioner Faust suggested that the subdivision be approved. and the variance question be addressed by the variance board. . She asked if the Commission approves- development of Lot 2 can we recommend that the house meets the setback requirements, and if it can't, the lot is-non-buildable. Commissioner McClelland said she believes a three lot subdivision works well with this property, and pointed out if variances are needed they are minimal. A discussion ensued on the placement of proposed houses and the setbacks along South Knoll Drive. Commissioner L. Johnson questioned if there would still be one driveway on Blake Road, the proposed plat shows two driveways. Mr. Larsen said it is his understanding that only one driveway would serve Blake Road. Commissioner L. Johnson said the topography may make it' necessary for two driveways to be developed. The driveways could be developed in such a way that there would be only one curb cut with the driveways branching off to individual properties. Mr. Larsen said what is depicted is just conceptual and there is room for redesign. Mr. Larsen said what the Commission needs to do is to either rescind their previous action for approval of the two lot subdivision or keep it as recommended, and vote on either approving or denying the revised plan presented this evening. Commissioner Palmer moved to recommend that the proposed three lot subdivision be denied on the grounds that the three proposed lots do not work well, if approved, the proposed house on Lot 2 would create an awkward situation for development, either by violating the front yard setback or pushing 'the proposed house so far back that the rear yard becomes compromised. Commissioner Runyan seconded the motion. Commissioner Byron said he believes this request should be decided on the merits of the subdivision process, not on if, or if not,,a variance may be required on Lot 2, or any of the proposed lots. The concern over variances, if any are needed, would then be heard by the Board of Appeals and Adjustments. Commissioner Palmer in response to Commissioner Byron said he understands his position, but believes the Commission is not required to approve a subdivision just because variances are not needed. He added other issues come into play, such as topography, symmetry, neighborhood character, etc. Upon Roll Call Vote: Faust; Nay L. Johnson; Aye McClelland, Nay Runyan; Aye Palmer; Aye workinger;Aye Ingwalson; Aye Byron; Nay Johnson; Nay r Motion carried. 5 -4. Chairman Johnson clarified for Mr. Farrell and Mr. Worst that what has occurred this evening, is that the proposed three lot subdivision request will go to the Council with a. recommendation_ for denial on a 5 -4 vote. The Council will also receive the minutes of the August 29, 1990, Commission meeting in which the Commission recommended approval of a two lot subdivision request with a conservation easement along the north along South Knoll. Mr. Larsen added that he felt the conservation easement included Lot 1 of the original three lot proposal. I October 4, 1990 Mr. Craig Larson Planning Director City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 I -I is iL/ r Re: Proposed subdivision of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1286, Hennepin County, Minnesota Property' -- Adjoining South Knoll Drive and Blake Road Dear Mr. Larson: This will confirm our telephone discussion of October 3, 1990 re the-above matter. 'The proposed subdivision of Tract A above described is to be heard by the City Council at its meeting on October 15, 1990 commencing at 7:00 p.m. You agreed to forward to me the following documents: 1. Copies of the Minutes of the Edina Planning Commission re its. meetings of August 29, 1990 and September 27, 1990. 2. Copies of any new revised Subdivision Plan which is filed and to be presented to the City Council on October 15 by Jim Farrell. 3. Copies of any reports, etc. you will be submitting to the City Council for its consideration in connection with the action it will take on October 15,1990. It is my understanding from our telephone discussion on October 3, that under the three lot subdivision proposed by Jim Farrell, which was denied by the Planning Commission, the same would require a variance for his proposed new northerly lot because it does not conform to the neighborhood standard for lot width which is 130 feet measured at a point 50 feet back from the curb line. Also, if that residence lot was approved (in front of the 'f 1 Mr. Craig Larson -2- October 4, 1990 present residence on Tract A) the requirements of the City of Edina for a building permit to erect a residence thereon requires the residence be set back from South Knoll Drive a distance equal to- the average of the setbacks for the residences that presently exist on the south side of South Knoll Drive. This would not be possible. For your information there are three residences along South Knoll Drive (which face north) between Blake Road and View Lane. Those residences are owned by Farrell, myself and Joas. There are no open building lots on the south side of Knoll Drive between, Blake Road and View Lane. As soon as the documents are available which are to be forwarded to me kindly forward the same. In the event any of the documents are not now available forward the others as soon as possible. Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation. ATW:csk Very truly .yours, A. Thomas Wurst 6205 South Knoll Drive Edina, Minnesota 55436 • PAuL1C7JOhS._ X 7j Vt "A 4� .4. C 2P • August = 22•; 1990 M Edina-City- PlAiminig-'-%commis Sion-- 4801.West 50th..Str_eet. -Edina. MM. '5 57 42. 4-; Edina )1•a'nnxnq_-Commii;s3.on: ­;.� ............... " ....... I.Zwould like*- 'tOz:-gq .,:on- record that.--. ainst the theme I-Seird-b Bla subdiVI-Sion: of. 16.t:7 5 TOO, (FarrelL. p3ppperty'') lime: at- 62A 9 Sduth-Knoll_ VeM% EU corner .o Suuth:Knoll and Blake:As=atvery bu. sy— - AP 7 Z.�L traffic area:--and..traffic continues- --ta'i'd im- atical Y!l�lill5l"-."i-",��.--�-x'- increase each,�Ypar: down Blake and..-Souih!kn-'oll._ three residences--ion.-:this corner. im:a.-::c1b:se--proxi would hurt�al 1'of�. the. surrounding ..ne-Lg hbors .. in S­-, More traffic•- congestion, property va.lVeisi: I.. -would appreciate if you would ple'a_S_ ejjep me.. ii, T how the planning-commission decides.,' -IT-can be-re 6& the day at7_-371-';-7998'and at night-- at±.9 3'5-=l 2 0 5. R s tfull.y ubmitted, Paul K.'-Joas-- .6,209:S,.-K*Ox.x_DWrV'E EDINA. MMMSO�Mi (6121 935-M)jM.7 N; W g r, aw �Y. All O, . REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: KENNETH ROSLAND FROM: DAVID VELDE VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: NOVEMBER 11, 1990 - AGENDA ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION: Collection of Garbage /Refuse from City properties. Company Amount of Quote or B'id 1• Aagard Environmental Services 1. $5.89 per cubic yd. 2. Browning Ferris Industries 2. $6.72 per cubic yd. 3. Waste Management 3. $7.76 per cubic yd. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Aagard Environmental Services at $5.89 per cubic yard. GENERAL INFORMATION: Bid specifications were mailed to nine licensed commercial refuse haulers. The bid from Aagard Environmental Services is 20 cents per cubic yard higher than the present contract. Estimated annual cost for refuse. removal from City properties for 1991 is $41,896.80. Signature The Recommended bid is within budget not Health Department Dep j' t x ji Director Kenneth Rosland City Manager -; While this item is not within budget we tend to be within budget for the general fund through cost savings in other areas. M E M O R A N D U M DATE: November 15, 1990 - -TO: Ken Rosland, City Manager FROM: John Wallin, Finance Director SUBJECT: Refuse Hauling Budgets Even though the increase in the Aagard bid,over the present contract is 20 cents per cubic ,yard, or about 3.4 %, the increases in budgeted refuse hauling for the City over the past couple of years has only increased about 1% annually. The departments that I would estimate as spending over the budget are: .Budget Estimated Fire $600 $1,800 Public Works Building $4,000 $6,500 Public Works Street $4,000 $6,500 These three - departments have extensive budgets and the .amount actually spent over the budget should be able to be picked up by spending under the budget in other categories. j ° REQUEST FOR PORCH �q s: ASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE 19 November, 1990 AGENDA ITEM IV. B. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Skid Steer Loader with Attachments Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Case Power & Equipment 1. $ 26,765.00 2. Lano Equipment, Inc. 2. $ 30,323.50 3. 3 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Case Power & Equipment $ 26,765.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This purchase is a new skid loader with attachments. It replaces Unit No. 25-430,.a 1974 John Deere skid loader. This purchase is from the equipment replacement fund. Public Works - Streets Si atur The Recommended bid is within budget not withiprbudd�i Kenneth City Wallin, 6Inance Director ° REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000 DATE. 19 November, 1990 AGENDA ITEM iv. c. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Fuel Monitoring System Company Amount of Quote or &d 1. Westside Equipment $ 10,362.00 2. Pump & Meter Service, Inc. 2. $ 12,535.00 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Westside Equipment $ 10,362.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is the purchase of a fuel monitoring system which is now required by state law for environmental protection. This equipment is attached to existing fuel tanks. The purchase is funded from the 1990 capital plan funds. i Public Works - Streets The Recommended bid is within budget not withirybudg4 Kenneth Rosland City Director k 1J, ° , N' REQUEST FOR PURCHASE ' ,.<.�, a 0. TO: Mayor Richards and City C6uncil FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director Park and Recreation Department VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5000 DATE: November 15, 1990 AGENDA ITEM IV. D ITEM DESCRIPTION: Driving Range Tractor To Pick Up Balls. Company Amount of Quote or &d 1• North Star Turf 2 • Toro 3. Cushman 4. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR END: North Star Turf GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. $6,105.00 2. $6,985.00 3. $7,389.50 4. 5. The tractor is used to pull the ball picking machine at the golf course driving range. The tractor is being ordered before January 1, 1991 for cost savings. During the winter the park maintenance crew will build a cage around the tractor to protect the driver from golf balls. This tractor will replace a 1979 418 John Deere Tractor. The Recommended bid is within budget a-1 c. O TO: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE CITY COUNCIL FROM: GORDON L. HUGHES, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00 DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 1990 AGENDA ITEM IV.E. ITEM DESCRIPTION: 50TH & FRANCE SEASONAL BANNERS Company Amount of Quote or &d 1. BANNER CREATIONS 1. $ 5,275 2. ARTISTIC SCREENING 2. 7,905 3. DISPLAY SALES 3. 8,516 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: BANNER CREATIONS GENERAL INFORMATION: The subject bid is for nylon banners to be placed within the new street light and pedestrian light standards on 50th & France.' (See attached sketch). The light standards were designed to accommodate such banners. The banners do not contain any advertising or messages - the purpose is to add color during the winter season. Signature The Recommended bid is 1f1) within budget not within Kenneth Rosland, City allin, FiWce Director _., METAL GLOBES TO HAVE CLEAR, TEMPERED GLASS LENS BOTTOM LUMINAIRE ENCLOSURE: 27" DIA. X 16" DP. ALUM. WITH 4 FOUR BARS, 90°APART MINIMUM OPENING SIZE FOR ACCESS DOORS m IS TO BE 6 INCHES ' 2' -6" i n� �- - 7— \\ I \I I. 3 1/2" O.D. ALUM., PIPE TYPE A -2 DOUBLE PEDESTRIAN io N r .11, m 2" 3" 0 N 3" 1' -2" I \ \I �I V I� TYPE A -1 SINGLE 2' -.6 12" DIA. GLOBE, TYPICAL I- 2, 3/4" ALUM. PIPE REMON BANNER ROD, TYPICAL i 3 1/2" O.D. ALUM. PIPE 3/4" MINUTES TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE NOVEMBER 13, 1990 9:00 A.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Craig G. Swanson Gordon Hughes Alison Fuhr MEMBERS ABSENT: Fran Hoffman, Chairman Bob Sherman OTHERS PRESENT: Mr. Tom Oestreich, 5220 Eden Avenue Mr. Brad Hokanson, 5409 Abbott Place Mr. Jeff Meyer, 50th and France Business Association Mr. Art Dickey, 4930 France Avenue South Mr. Alan.Siegman, 3940 West 50th Street Mr. Carl Weisser, 6566 France Avenue South Mr. James Wilson, 3225 West 54th Street Captain Len Kleven, Edina Police Department Officer Kris Eidem, Edina Police Department Ms. Joan Waterstreet, Edina Police Department n SECTION A V, (A) Requests on which the Committee recommends approval as requested or modified and the Council's authorization of recommended action. (1) Discuss traffic and pedestrian safety concerns at West 66th Street and France Avenue. Request received from Carl Weisser, Manager, Point of France Association, 6566 France Avenue South. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Swanson began by stating that the Committee had reviewed the City's plan for the area. Mr. Weisser was asked to present his concerns to the Committee. Mr. Wiesser stated that there is presently a sign for westbound traffic just east of Point of France driveway which states "SIGNAL YOUR TURN ". However, he has observed that most eastbound traffic tends to think this means to signal the direction at the intersection of Valley View Road, and therefore there are several near misses for those turning right into the complex's driveway. He asked if the present sign might be moved west of the driveway and that some sort of signing be placed to denote that there are turn movements ahead for those wanting to turn into the drive- way. He also asked for consideration of a separate turn lane being cut to allow access to the driveway and also for the intersection to be studied with regard to the difficulty of pedestrian crossing of France Avenue. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES November 13, 1990 Page 2 Mrs. Fuhr stated that she felt any improvement costs with regard to cutting additional turn lanes would probably have to be bore by the complex. Also, Mr. Swanson stated that, as France Avenue is a county road, any pedestrian safety reviews would need to by conducted by the County. Mr. Huehes moved to relocate the "SIGNAL YOUR TURN" sign west of the drive- way to Point of France, to have the Engineering Department review the site for possible ways to cut a turn lane for westbound traffic into the complex and /or appropriate signing and pass on to City Council and to recommend to the City Council to pass a resolution to Hennepin County to review the pedestrian safety issues at West 66th Street and France Avenue. Mrs. Fuhr seconded the motion. Motion carried 3 -0. SECTION B Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request. None. SECTION C Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others. (1) Request to.end West 54th Street at Zenith Avenue and create a cul -de -sac. Continued from October 1990 meeting. Request for four -way "STOP" signs at West 54th Street and Abbott Avenue/ Place (currently uncontrolled). Petition received from numerous area residents. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Swanson, acting as Chairman for the Committee, asked that both agenda Items (1) and (2) be considered simultaneously, as they both directly affect the same common area. He asked Captain Kleven if there was any new data to review since the October meeting. Captain Kleven stated that speed surveys had been conducted on West 54th Street between France Avenue and Zenith, and especially concentrated in the area of Beard Avenue. The results of these surveys showed that the 85 percentile speed of traffic was in excess of acceptable tolerances. Since these surveys were begun, the Traffic Enforcement Unit had been assigned.to this area and this assignment would continue for at least another month to hopefully act as a deterrent to speeders. Mr.'Swanson concluded that speed did seem to be a critical problem in the area, and Captain Kleven concurred with this assessment. Mr. Wilson stated that he initially had contacted Edina Public Works and Engineering Departments inquiring about the possibility of creating a cul -de -sac at West 54th and Zenith Avenue. Initially, he was told this may not be the most feasible solution, so other options such as a "STOP" TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES November 13, 1990 Page 3 sign were discussed. Mr. Hokanson related that he had circulated a peti- tion to neighbors requesting a "STOP" sign at West 54th and Abbott Avenue/ Place, as it seemed the more reasonable solution. He also stated that there are no controls at present at this intersection and the caution one must use when proceeding through the intersection is such that a complete stop is necessary even without signing. Mr. Hughes asked about Minneapolis' pattern of stopping at alternating intersections throughout their city and how does it reflect at West 54th and Abbott. Mr. Hokanson said that an additional "STOP" sign would need to be added to the Minneapolis side in order to keep this pattern, as only the north /south streets are stopped at this time, Mrs. Fuhr moved that Minneapolis be contacted with the idea of continuation of their Rresent signing attern on the border streets with consideration being given to further placement of "STOP" signs on West 54th within our City limits, and also that more warning signs be placed at the curve on West 54th and Zenith Avenue. Motion seconded by Mr. Hughes. Motion carried 3 -0. (2) Request to change "Hours of Limited Parking" signage in 49 -1/2 Street Municipal Parking Facility. Request received from 50th and France Business and Professional Associa- tion. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Alan Siegman began by correcting the agenda request to include not only the 49 -1/2 Street ramp, but also the 51st Street ramp. The request by the Association, in essence, was to enforce only the 1 -Hour parking areas of the ramps from Thanksgiving through Christmas, but allow parking for unlimited periods in all other signed areas. They explained that they are reviewing several issues regarding the ramps, employee parking, customer concerns, etc., and that their request was a temporary solution through the holidays until a final plan could be offered to the City Council. This finalized plan would not be available until after the first of the year. Mr. Swanson stated that from a law enforcement standpoint, ramp parking enforcement had always been hard to do, but he felt a balance could be found to accommodate all needs. However, he is opposed to the idea of enforcing the law and then temporarily not enforcing the law. Enforce- ment in all areas is used as a tool to instruct the general public on proper and lawful conduct. Therefore as a law enforcement person, he would not be comfortable taking the position that this temporary measure is acceptable. Mr. Swanson felt that any changes to the ramp parking policy should be handled by measure of a resolution from the City Council and not by the Traffic Safety Committee. Mr. Hughes stated that he also felt the Council had the ultimate author- ity to change our ordinance regarding parking time restrictions and he had had the Association approach the Committee as a matter of policy based on past parking ramp considerations. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES November 13, 1990 Page 4 Mr. Hughes moved to pass the item on to City Council for review and possible change by resolution. Mrs. Fuhr seconded the motion. Motion carried 3 -0. (3) Discuss traffic safety and signing concerns at West 66th Street and Valley View extension. ' Request received from Ms. Beth DeLap, 6408 Ryan Avenue South. ACTION TAKEN: Ms. DeLap had sent a letter to the Committee explaining her concern for traffic patterns for ,westbound West 66th Street just past the intersection of France Avenue. The concern is that vehicles in the left westbound lane cross the intersection and then immediately try to negotiate into the right lane to progress to northbound'Valley View Road. Her suggestion was to place signs for westbound 66th Street traffic before the France Avenue intersection stating that left lane traffic must proceed west only and right lane traffic may proceed west or turn northbound onto Valley View Road. After review of the plans consulted during discussion of West 66th and France Avenue area, it was felt that this item should be forwarded to City Council for review before reconstruction phase begins. Mr. Hughes moved to forward this concern to the City Council for review and Possible public hearing before implementation of the reconstruction Phase of West 66th Street and Valley View extension. Mrs. Fuhr seconded the motion. Motion carried 3 -0. EDINA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE i 0f750th & FRANCE hUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION P.O. Box 24122 Edina, Minnesota 55424 13 November 1990 Mayor Frederick S. Richards Councilman Glenn Smith Councilwoman Peggy Kelly Councilman Bernard - G. Rice, Jr. Councilwoman Jane Paulus CITY OF EDINA / CITY HALL 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 [612]927 -8861 Re: THE 50TH & FRANCE DOWNTOWN EDINA BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION Petition to the Edina City Council for a Temporary Suspension of three (3) hour parking restrictions in the West 49 1/2 Street Ramp ( north ramp) and the West 51st /Halif ax Ramp ( south ramp ) during the Holiday Season Dear Mr. Mayor and Council Members; The Board of Directors of the 50th and France Business and Professional Association formally requests that the three (3) hour parking restriction which is currently being enforced in the North and South Ramps at 50th and France be temporarily suspended for the Holiday Season, while the Board generates a new and comprehensive Parking Plan for the 50th and France area incorporating all of the current and near future available parking. This request is in response to what has become an urgent need to modify. our current restrictive hours for our customers. Increasingly, the Downtown Edina area is becoming a place where people wish to come to do business and shop for a goodly portion of the day. The complaints to our merchants and professional and to our Executive Director's Office in this past year have compounded to the point that the Board of Directors feels it must do something in the short term for the Holidays while generating a master parking plan for the area which will keep the 50th and France business community competitive with Southdale and Galleria and other like areas, where parking hours are unrestricted. We have* taken the liberty of attaching a letter from a customer who fortunately took the time to write of her grievance instead of simply not returning to shop in the area. This letter, Ladies and Gentlemen, is a summation of our current dilemma. We as businessmen, need our customers; however, if our customers are continually "inconvenienced" and put off by restrictive parking, they will go elsewhere for their goods and services. While the intent to turnover parking spaces during the,day has been upper most in our minds through the years, the continual "bother" of time checking destroys our customers desire to spend any length of time with us. Our request for a temporary suspension in the three (3) hour parking Mayor of the City of Edina and City Council Members 13 November 1990 ,page two _ is, granted, an experiment, but also many be viewed as an appeasement to our customers during the most hectic shopping season... one we hope will restore some of the goodwill to our old customers who have found themselves continually frustrated. We wish to retain the one (1) hour parking areas for our older customers' convenience and-for "quick trips". We also which to retain the two (2) hour parking in the lot on the north side of West 49 1/2 Street and the one (1) hour parking in the Clancy's lot. ; The Board is aware that the employee parking situation will have to be monitored even more closely should the Council grant our request, but there are plane being prepared as we speak to deal with this aspect of the situation. "Convenience for our customers" and "competitiveness with other shopping areas" are the foremost justifications for our proposal to this body. We urgently request your serious consideration of our petition. We, the Board of Directors thank you for your time and attention to.our request. If you require additional information or if we may answer any questions for you, please do not hesitate to. contact any one of us through the,Association office or at our individual businesses. Very Truly Yours, l The Board of Directors 50TH AND FRANCE DOWNTOWN EDINA BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION [612]922 -1524 cc: Mayor Richards and the City Council Members The Board of Directors' Files '90 Executive Director's Files '90 enclosures: Simensen Letter of'24 September 1990 Executive Director's Reply of 8 October 1990 ' 0 I, : /mss _w,t;vt& P�� Md WM � 3e '- = xl�e, zecl 3 Xo, tie �a� ell L"I a- Y2 -Z L 50th- & FRANCE-'-. BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION P.O. Box 24122 Edina, Minnesota 55424 8 October 1990 Betty Simensen 4920 Dona Lane Golden Valley, MN 55422 Re: Parking Letter of 24 September 1990 Dear Ms. Simensen; With reference to the above letter, may I take this opportunity to thank you for following through with your complaint and contacting us. We need to, know when our customers are being inconvenienced and when current policies are causing hardships. We have been made aware that more and more of our clientele is wishing to spend the entire day in the area -as you did. This is an issue which is currently- being "thrashed" over to come up with an equitable plan for our customers, the powers that be at the Edina City Hall and the employees on the corner. As I hope I conveyed to you on the phone the other day, our first and foremost concern is our customers. Without you all, we obviously would not be in business. However, we do need to accommodate our employees who work very hard f or. you and arrange for some kind of customer parking turnover since we are unfortunately at a premium for same. Please be assured Ms. Simensen, that we do take each and every complaint very seriously and we are in the process of attempting to come up with some major plan to assist our customers. With all of the interested parties involved, we are sure that we will make someone unhappy, but it will not be our customers. Thank you again for taking the time to register your complaint instead of just not coming back to "The Corner ". We of the 50th and France Business and Professional Association do not wish to loose you as a customer, nor do we wish to alienate any customer. We are trying to make improvements all the time and will if folks like you take the time to let us know how we can serve you better. If you need any assistance in the future on the corner, please do not hesitate to contact this office. We will be more than happy to help. Very Truly Yours, L. L. Emery Werth, Executive Director 50TH AND FRANCE DOWNTOWN EDINA BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION (612)922 -1524 cc: Board of Directors' Files '90 Executive Director's Files '90 o ei �� o REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KENNETH ROSLAND From: DAVID A VELDE Date: NOVEMBER 13, 1990 Subject: POLICY ADDRESSSING ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION Recommendation: Agenda Item # V • B Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance 0 Discussion Adopt a policy prohibiting coaches and chaperons from consuming alcohol while traveling with City sponsored youth athletic events. Info /Background The Edina Community Health Services Advisory Committee adopted a resolution at their November 8, 1990, meeting supporting the Edina School districts Strategic Plan. In addition, the Edina Community Health Services Advisory Committee recommends that the City of Edina adopt a policy prohibiting the consumption of alcohol by coaches and chaperons while traveling with City sponsored youth athletic teams. The Committee believes that sanctions for failing to comply with this policy should include seasonal, annual or total suspension for the violators. 0 WHEREAS, the Edina Community Health Services Advisory Committee was created to advise the Edina City Council on matters relating to the health and well being of the community, and WHEREAS, the Edina Community Heath Services Advisory Committee has reviewed, studied and discussed the Strategic Plan adopted by the Edina School District and endorses theogoals set forth in this Strategic Plan, and WHEREAS, the School district Strategic Plan incorporates a goal to prohibit the consumption of alcohol by adult chaperons and coaches while traveling with youth athletic teams in an effort to promote positive role models for the youth of our community, and WHEREAS, the Edina Community Health Services Advisory Committee wholeheartedly endorses the ideal of promoting healthy lifestyles by adults setting positive examples when in the presence of our youth; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina Community Health Services Advisory Committee that a recommendation be forwarded to the Edina City Council to adopt a policy that all coaches and chaperons traveling with youth athletic teams refrain from consuming alcohol in any form while traveling with the team. RS f Agenda Item V.0 r- - METRO RELATIONS INC. October 1, 1990 Kenneth Rosland City Manager 4801 50th St W Edina MN15 424 Dear nd: What is the most costly line item in many city budgets? What public agency pays many of the highest wages and fringe benefits in the metropolitan area? What public agency gets 95 percent of its $120,000,000 operating revenues from cities? What public agency that serves cities exclusively has no direct city voice in its affairs? The answer to all of these questions is: the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) ranks right behind the Metropolitan Transit Commission (MTC) with the second largest budget of all the metropolitan agencies. Contrary to the MTC, which receives its revenues from the fare box, the state government, the federal government, as well as a tax within each city, the MWCC gets 95 percent of its current $120,000,000 budget from the cities. That means the cities must come tip with $114,000,000. And there is no opting out! The MWCC charges continue to grow. At a time when many cities are forced to curtail some municipal services because of reduced revenues, the cost of wastewater treatment is going tip at historically unprecedented rates. The MWCC is not subject to any budgetary constraints such as the levy limit law imposed on cities. It can raise rates at will. THE PROBLEM: No one speaks for the cities. There is no one consistently and intensively watching the Commission and advocating the interests of cities. There is no one consistently doing analyses to assure that MWCC activities and expenditures are necessary and in the interests of its users, the cities. Stich lack of oversight has contributed to some known, and probably many unknown, excessive expenditures in the past. For example,)at the present time-many MWCC personnel and fringe benefit costs far exceed comparable municipal personnel and fringe benefit costs. Yet, it is the cities which pay these costs. In addition, not only are these expenditures a direct added cost through rate charges to cities, but a secondary cost is that such practice complicates municipal labor negotiations. 5913 Chowen South • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55410 • (612) 926 -6201 TAE SOLUTION: Metro Relations, Inc. has been established to provide an ongoing MWCC oversight, analysis and advocacy service for your city and other cities. It.will assure the presence of the interests of.cities at Commission discussions and deliberations. It will provide analyses of Commission issues from the municipal perspective, and will advocate, when appropriate, the interests of your city and others with the Commission. No city can afford on its own to provide such service consistently and in depth. But by joint action, an on -going professional monitoring, analysis and advocacy service can be provided for a very low individual municipal investment. What are the BENEFITS? A major focus will be on keeping MWCC budget increases to absolute necessary levels. Success in keeping an MWCC budget increase down just 1 percent would save the.cities over a million dollars in one year, and would multiply many times over the small investment in Metro Relations, Inc. For the first time your city and the other cities will have an on -going professional presence with the Commission, someone who knows the system and knows the process. The investment in Metro Relations, Inc. is not competitive with other general fund priorities, or such memberships as the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities or the League of Minnesota Cities. Because the focus of Metro Relations, Inc. is exclusively on the MWCC, the city's subscription fee can, and appropriately should, be a part of the municipal sewer service enterprise budget. To assure effective coordination Metro Relations Inc. will meet regularly with the appropriate Board committee of the the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities. I will be the program's principal staff person. I have the qualifications and capabilities to make the program work effectively. I was Executive Director and Department Director for the Metropolitan Council. I know well the operations of the MWCC from these several years; of oversight responsibilities and other more recent studies. I also understand the needs and concerns of cities. This stems from my term as_ Executive Director of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalit`ies.—I know the system. I am skilled at working in the' process. I will represent the participating cities well. Support for the service is on a subscription basis. Subscription fees vary depending on the city's use of the wastewater system, ranging from a low of $1250 to a high of $5850. Compare these modest amounts to the charges you now pay to the MWCC. Enclosed are a list of questions and answers and an agreement to establish the city as a participating member. The agreement also sets forth the amount of the city's annual investment as a participating city. I look forward to this opportunity of service to make your city and others more effective in the metropolitan area. I will be pleased to meet with you at any time to discuss the proposal. Sr"c re 1y, Pc n a E. Franche . . EEF.tm QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS What is Metro Relations Inc.? Metro Relations Inc. is a corporation established on behalf of cities to monitor closely the activities of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC), to analyze MWCC issues and to advocate.the interests of participating cities with the MWCC. Why is Metro Relations Inc. necessary? The cities in this metropolitan area now pay well over $10.0,000,000 each year,to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, yet cities have -no direct voice in how or at what, cost service' is to be provided. - Metro Relations Inc. will conduct ongoing analyses of .MWCC issues on behalf of participating cities, will be present at all Commission deliberations, will communicate regularly on MWCC issues. with participating cities, and will advocate the interests of participating cities when appropriate. Who decides what the Commission does? It is the Commission which decides what the Commission does, within the context of the broad policies laid down by the Metropolitan Council. Commissioners are appointed by the Metropolitan Council, which in turn is appointed by the Governor. The Chair of the MWCC is also appointed by the Governor. What will Metro Relations Inc. do for the participating cities? Metro Relations Inc. will: 1. Represent the participating cities at Commission and Committee meetings. 2.." Analyze key MWCC issues of importance to ;participating cities. 3. Analyze MWCC budgets and participate in the budget - making process on behalf of the participating cities. 4. Advocate the interests of participating cities with the MWCC. 5. Report regularly to the participating cities on key MWCC issues. i 6. Alert participating cities when issues before the Commission warrant immediate attention and action. Why is it necessary at this time to have cities represented with the MWCC? The costs of wastewater treatment are' going .tip at historically unprecedented rates. Among other things, the ;MWCC now compensates some of its employees at salaries, wages and .fringe benefits which far exceed those of.cities. Cities pay these costs through their rates and SAC charges. These costs have now reached a level which warrants that the cities have a strong, informed, regtilar and consistent professional presence with the Commission, and keep themselves informed with ongoing analyses of key MWCC issues so that appropriate action can be taken. What will be the benefits? Money! Among other things. Succeeding in keeping proposed MWCC. increases down just 1 Percent will multiply many times over -the cities,' small investment in Metro Relations Inc. Also, for the first time in the history of the Commission, there will be on -going analyses of MWCC issues and advocacy for the cities interests at all Commission deliberations. No city can afford to do this consistently on its own, yet it, becomes extremely cost effective as a joint.effort. How do we know Metro Relations Inc. will get results? Success depends on the capabilities, track record and commitment of the key person involved. The person committed to lead and staff this program is a top tirban government professional with over twenty years experience. He is known to many city managers in the area with whom he has worked as a competent, capable and effective professional of high integrity. His background and experience have prepared him exceedingly well to undertake the program. He-previously served as Executive Director of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities and Executive Director of the Metropolitan Council, and has conducted his own government relations and planning firm for the past three years.. 2 Who is Gene Franchett? Eugene E. Franchett is owner and president o -f Metro Relations, Inc. He has directed his own firm of Gene Franchett and Associates, doing planning and government relations, for the past three years. His background is rich in government affairs including: Executive Director Metropolitan Council Department Director Metropolitan Council Executive Director Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Executive Director Governor's Task Force on Metropolitan Problems (Wisc.) Executive Director Fox Valley Council of Governments (Wisc.) He' has written national award winning reports. He was named outstanding regional council executive director in the country in 1983 and outstanding public administrator in Minnesota.' 3 AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of 1990 between the city of , Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "City ", and' Metro Relations Inc., hereinafter referred to as "MRI„ WITNESSETH WHEREAS, it is in the interest of the city to engage the services of. MRI to monitor on behalf of the city. the operations and activities of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, hereinafter referred to as "MWCC", to conduct research and analyses of MWCC matters, and to undertake related activities, and WHEREAS, it is in the interest of the city to share the cost' of such monitoring and analyses with other cities of like interests who shall also contract with MRI for this same purpose, and WHEREAS, MRI and its principal agent, Eugene E. Franchett,.is particularly knowledgeable and competent to conduct such monitoring and analyses NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows AGREEMENT A. Character and Extent of Services 1. MRI agrees to provide services as follows: a. To be present on behalf of the city and the other participating cities a -t MWCC commission meetings and committee meetings. b. To analyze key MWCC issues of importance. to the city and_ the other participating cities. c. To analyze MWCC budgets and participate in the.budget- making process on behalf of the city and the other participating cities and make recommendations on behalf of the participating cities. 1 d. To advocate the interests of the city in common with the other participating,cities with the MWCC. e. To notify within a reasonable time the chief administrative officer of the ci "ty and the other participating cities when .MRI determines that issues before the commission warrant immediate attention and action. f. To report in writing regularly to the city and the other participating cities on .key MWCC issues. .B. Compensation 1. The services performed by MRI shall be paid by annual subscriptions by each participating municipality. The amount of each city's subscription shall. vary from $12"50 to $5850 per year depending on the extent of the city's use of the regional waste water treatment system. Within these parameters the annual subscription fee shall be approximately 0.2% of the MWCC estimated gross charge to the city for current costs for interceptor and treatment works (.002 x current costs). The subscription fee for the city in 1991 is�j 7� 0, ° -'- Such subscription fee shall be paid by the city as follows: One -half on or before February 1 of each year and one -half on or before August 1 of each year. C. Duration and Termination 1. This agreement is made contingent, upon the execution of like contracts by not less than seven cities, and upon meeting that contingency MRI shall give written notice of, the effectiveness of the contract to each city. 2. This agreement shall be in effect for one year commencing January 1, 1991 and ending December 31, 1991, HOWEVER it shall renew automatically each subsequent year unless Notice of Termination shall be given pursuant to Paragraph (a) following. a. Either the city or MRI may terminate this agreement by giving the other party written notice on or before October 1 of any year giving notice of termination at the end of that calendar year; and the agreement shall continue until the effective date of such termination. A notice of termination may be rescinded by either party at any time. c. This agreement shall be terminated at the end of the calendar year when the number of participating'municipalities is reduced to less than the number of participating municipalities required to put the agreement into effect. 2 D. Miscellaneous 1. Execution of this Agreement does not create a contract of employment.' MRI and Eugene E. Franchett are and shall remain independent contractors, therefore the city shall not be responsible for payment of social security or withholding taxes, nor for unemployment or worker's compensation insurance or other benefits. 2. If the city resolves to retain MRI to. pursue a matter of special interest with the MWCC it may do so provided the matter is not in conflict with the interests of the other participating cities, and MRI shall receive an additional fee for such services which shall be based on its standard per diem fees. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement the day and year firs_..above written. Metro elati s Inc. By: f% Its Pre d ient Date OG% y3F� 3 City By,: Its Date 5701 NORMANDALE ROAD, EDINA. MINNESOTA 55424 PHONE 612;922 -0676' November 8, 1990 Mayor-and Council Members City of Edina /: -801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Ladies and Gentlemen: Agenda Item V.D The Minnesota Legislature, in its 1990 session, passed legislation enabling municipalities to, by ordinance, authorize the holder of an on -sale wine license to sell 3.2 beer, and whose total sales are at least 60 percent attributable to the sale of food, to sell strong beer at on -sale without an additional license (340a .404 Subd. 5. (b)). After consideration and discussion,'the board of directors of the Edina Chamber of Commerce has concluded that the passage of an ordinance for the City of Edina authorizing the sale of strong beer in a manner consistent with the existing• ordinances regulating the sale of on -sale wine would be beneficial to the business environment of the city, which in turn, would serve the general best interests of the city -as a whole. The board's opinion is based, in part, on the positive effect the wine licensing established -in 1985 has had on business development, specifically in maintaining and attracting high quality restaurants to the community, and the belief that the sale of beer under the existing ordinance would enhance further similar business development without negative effects. The primary benefit would be the attraction of restaurants for which sale of imported beers is considered as important to business development as the sale of wines. Generally, imported beers have alcohol content ranging to about 6 percent, which is, greater than the 3.2 percent maximum required to qualify as a nonintoxicating beverage, but less than the 6 to 14 percent typical of wines. Such an ordinance would be generally c,onsistant. with the public attitude expressed in the informal referendum held prior to the passage of the wine ordinance, since the sale of beer would be based on the same criteria as established at that time, and since the, consumption of beer in conjunction with dining is generally considered similar.in character to the sale of wine.,Finally, the availability of 3.2 beer has been longstanding in the city and is therefore generally accepted. After reaching this conclusion, the Board of Directors of the Chamber of Commerce passed a resolution supporting the addition of strong beer to the wine licensing ordinance as provided by Minnesota law, and hereby requests that the City Council consider and pass an enabling ordinance to that effect. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Marsh Everson President- n, o � �. 9p, ay/ REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KENNETH ROSLAND Agenda Item # -11 E. From: CRAIG LARSEN Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: NOVEMBER 19, 1990 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: TAX FORFEIT LAND ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: 1. Acquire parcel A for open space. 2. Sell Parcels B and C to adjacent property owners. Info /Background Parcel A is located adjacent to our existing ponding and open space in the Dewey Hill neighborhood. Public ownership of the parcel is desirable. Parcel B is a small (30 feet by 20 feet) portion of a private alley serving homes on Doncaster Way and Lobhloy Drive. There appears to be no public purpose for acquisition of this parcel. Parcel C is a narrow strip of land (11 1/2 feet) between 3205 and 3219 West 6'Oth Street. We do not know how or why this parcel was created. There are no public utilities or public uses of the property. - - - ,.�; -- • �„ 1. �. ti�� .���•.r- Y..�- •:�.�'•!'1J4?��i� i� PVC. :'y�,._�����f 10D 0 100. 400 `- :�' ate* scale feet - _ 24)EWEY_ X89• z{s1Q , .• �� / ,�• ,:� J9al *, � , - {o'�Sy�j ,W '►� �09'gb�T CA ° `{ /'� .l A1°�y p �' 'e� t Ste• *'ls �,c A 33ti� .•..v>Jr �� �(�G �+s 1 sur �'� , GONE 4% Q� YO,�' 2 \000 oN � t ° OO / � p► `� Q � /�7 � 0. �•ti~ jlj.l� 111./4 1 �� ��` 36 1AJ V ' V� • 3 P Ki Q -�• •�i!Iti V� _ i! •���I� { 5�,� 1�• 9 w.r �2 -OS r, r *z 38�' SI 396, !i 1 L. •jo'o4" -;f7 0 A 44 (�% 589036 j* `�T it OrSYfY /1 A./N49 O 29 1 1 0 a i 16 I 09 •3r,_ �, : r 23 3 1211 m •S! ITS 1) 3 15 e =�� r • G�. �� L' w ti I ^ 61.0 1 A.AOOM 3501 IV a :�`Z `„�. - °JIG. �•� i 24 17 7 6 5 4 3 •! w ilt. ! 7I.L4 L 4.7 _ a •9 ps, •9 M/ / � Ex Q ?Z y r s� O o �— '�i �s. wN I's 10 P DSO ,t °' ' woo O 4 N d • 17 ,36'2a "W ° a6. ti • ' � QO q • �' � I a�1 41V ON l7V ` \ r o• o °� pt V a3 'bla . 575.5 v ° •; m° Li9.97 0 .1V99'18'S6•'E 397 j •t1 �gJ� av•4j "4 7 h••- - _ — — 33•. 4 � s t 54 NCA51 !: ► :J 19 ' •.S C• 4444:1/ 1 r.. .� 1• „dam! �ONCE��.WA ` S4 'ot .oH 4d /•044:1, t. 4 '14% � ,� SV• A �( ` b 'j`'' �, R1y EN_014 HL' N =� ~ 2nd A DDI NON y o•Y VICT' SEN' A0�0�T_ �; N '�J �g �. „< w T0= ED/ A o,. H /G7yNOS 13e.o 1 5 21 •.� ]l•t, 7.f ,1 �— no Jbi Pj h; �t ei ° 1 _ 319 a • �� z L7CNLOY " DR ,. W -EDINA. JW J t .. '- J•� '�.L r Iid W 1 4 R •� ••tit • A 44 .rd�.�.'% -- � � ' - - ; ' ` � ,•^ it ,. � � I .• ! `� n ��. �.•.. �^ — a CXp 4 z n DUNCRAIG D R — ` • . y 'Vl 30 ° kh; . I I =12 . 'pay. 1 114.1 u1 - C_n #AW S ✓ o N 14 3030 ^ 30 30 141 Do °' vV# - i.li •.3S I ... !s b P 1 I 134 d;&—' L7 .► 3 3 3 3� 4 *oKE;p `p 1t}1 ' li Z �tao 1I t go. 1 F o9 �r� �• 1 r � `�: 4 4 I D s (5610 i 28 � rs 10 1 6 :' j• (Sb � 6 r. 30 y e - 92, 7 ^-- 6, 7 I K� �3 i34. : fz ° 16x01 l0 3r-,, N 7 =bl k, • 4 e+ 0 24 6 .t. ° ► ✓aq II ^ 22'� _ s �51 12 C 3 �, ✓ 3g Ri 21 ^ 12 c� 4 61 I (_l - r 6 1 _ OW AL DINA 2 r� 0 -+ ' *a✓ '••— 14S- �' 19 14 I� m 60 (3265 l 15� r c H DE 'g (4205 _° P; 31 eu 1e� o o }z 9 N �, +. t�r AD (4430 [i' vi �/ 0 0 ajG 16'A 91.16 „d o 11 Gd 9 r= /.10141 o4' w IG 1636.09 Rcs °..... • _ ..fL.. .... .• C '• � mil. G. i r-!.•, 1 °' {!�°• .. I. � ^ t^• r 7 +' r• Oy ,:f RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that the City Attorney be authorized and directed to file "Application by Governmental Subdivision For Conveyance of Tax Forfeited Lands ", for the following described property contained in Hennepin County Auditor's List "760 -NC ", said property to be used by the City as hereafter set forth: PIN 08- 116 -21 -42 -0216 - Open space ADOPTED this 19th day of November, 1990. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 19, 1990, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 4th day of December, 1990. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has received from the County of Hennepin a list of lands in said municipality which became the property of the State of Minnesota for non - payment of property taxes, which said list was received on 11/07/90, Non - Conservation List 760 -NC; and WHEREAS, the parcels in said list identified as PIN Nos. 29- 117 -21 -43 -0047 and 20- 028 -24 -34 -0002 have heretofore been classified by the Board of County Commissioners of Hennepin County, Minnesota as non - conservation land and the sale thereof has heretofore been authorized by said Board of County Commissioners; WHEREAS, it has been determined by the Edina City Council that there are no existing or pending special assessments on said parcels; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the said classification is hereby approved; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that, acting pursuant to Minnesota Statute 282.01, it has determined that said parcels of land are not buildable according to the City's Zoning Ordinance because of minimum area and that sale of said parcels be limited to abutting property owners for attachment thereto. ADOPTED this 19th day of November, 1990. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that.the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy'of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 19, 1990 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 4th day of December, 1990. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk \ RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that the City Attorney be authorized and directed to file "Application by Governmental Subdivision For Conveyance of Tax Forfeited Lands ", for the following described property contained in Hennepin County Auditor's List "760 -NC ", said property to be used by the City as hereafter set forth: PIN 08- 116 -21 -42 -0216 - Open space. ADOPTED this 19th day of November, 1990. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 19, 1990, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 4th day of December, 1990. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk o e Cn� REPORT/RECOMMENDATION ECOMMENDATION J J• v' To: KEN ROSLAND From: RALPH JOHNSON Date: NOVEMBER 15, 1990 Subject: SET BOARD OF REVIEW DATE. Agenda Item # •F Consent 0 Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action x❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Recommendation: APRIL 22, 1991, 5:00 P.M. Info /Background: THE BOARD OF REVIEW HAS A 20 DAY PERIOD TO CONCLUDE ITS BUSINESS PRIOR TO MAY 31. APRIL 22 IS THE FOURTH MONDAY OF THE MONTH AND APPEARS TO BE AN OPEN DATE FOR THE COUNCIL. PREVIOUS DATES WERE 4/24/89 AND 4/23/90. otLe REPORT /RECOMMENDATION • fN�APOMt�v leas To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Date: NOVEMBER 15, 1990 Subject: 1991 COUNCIL MEETING DATES Recommendation: Agenda Item # V.G Consent 0 Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Approval of the Council Meeting Schedule for 1991 as presented. Info /Background In determining Council meeting dates for 1991, I find that in the months of January, February and September the regular Council meeting falls on a holiday. I would recommend we follow the pattern established during the last two years as follows: In a month when the regular meeting falls on a holiday and there are five Mondays in the month, the Council meetings were held on the second and fourth Mondays. In a month with four Mondays, the Council meeting was moved to the following Tuesday if the Monday was a holiday. That would result in the following Council meeting schedule for 1991:° January - Monday, January 7 (first Monday) and Tuesday, January 22 (Monday, January 21 is Martin Luther King Day) February - Monday, February 4 (first I,tonday) and Tuesday, February 19 (Monday, February 18 is-Presidents Day) September - Monday, September 9 and Monday, September 23 (2nd and 4th Monday) (Monday, September 2 is Labor Day; five Mondays in month) (MUNICIPAL LEGISI..ATNE COMMISSION * NOTICE * Agenda Item VIII.B 1500 Northland Plaza 3800 West 80th-Street Bloomington. Minnesota 55431 (612) 893 -6650 THE MLC WILL HOST A BREAKFAST MEETING 7:30 a.m., WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 5, 1990 DECATHLON ATHLETIC CLUB, BLOOMINGTON. The purpose of this meeting is to welcome all of the following NEWLY ELECTED legislators who will be representing MLC cities: RON ERHARDT District 42B CHARLES HALBERG District 38 JEFF HANSON District 56A PAUL HUFNAGLE District 41A PHIL KRINKIE District 53A PEGGY LEPPIK District 45B TED MONDALE District 44 DENNIS NEWINSKI a District 54B PHIL RIVENESS District 40 JUDY TRAUB District 45 Please notify all of your mayors and councilmembers. i RSVP TO HEATHER FLORINE 893 -6674 BY FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 29, 1990 Member Cities: Bloomington, Brooklyn Park, Burnsville. Eagan. Eden Prairie. Edina. InverlGrove Heights, Maple Grove. Maplewood. Minnetonka, Plymouth. Roseville. Shoreview, White Bear Lake. Woodbury CHECK 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 303630 11/05/90 ITEM DESCRIPTION 322A54 11/05/90 322A54 11/05/90 322A54 11/05/90 322A54 11/05/90 322A54 11/05/90 * * * * ** 323701 11/05/90 323702 11/05/90 323703 11/05/90 323704 11/05/90 323705 11/05/90 323705 11/05/90 323705 11/05/90 323706 11/05/90 323707 11/05/90 323708 11/05/90 323709 11/05/90 323710 11/05/90 323711 11/05/90 323712 11/05/90 323713 11/05/90 323714 11/05/90 CHECK REGISTER 11 -19 -90 PAGE 1 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 41.00 BERTELSON BROS. INC. 3 RING BINDERS 10- 4516 - 600 -60 614583 41.00 * ** -CKS 67.15 AAGARD CARDBOARD RECYCLING 10- 4250 - 540 -54 36.75 AAGARD CARDBOARD RECYCLING 50- 4250 - 821 -82 36.75 AAGARD CARDBOARD RECYCLING 50- 4250- 841 -84 39.75- AAGARD CARDBOARD RECYCLING 50- 4250 - 861 -86 36.75 AAGARD CARDBOARD RECYCLING 50- 4250 - 861 -86 137.65 * * ** -CKS 1.00 DAGMAR ANDERSON AMBULANCE REFUND 10- 3180 - 000 -00 1.00 * 100.00 PAT GREER OCT EXHIBIT FEE 30- 3501 - 000 -00 100.00 * 63.12 LITIN PAPER CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 23- 4504 - 613 -61 A58551 1544 63.12 * 433.99 MICHAEL SNYDER UNIFORM ALLWANCE 10- 4266 - 420 -42 433.99 * 2.32 AUTO WHSL WEST INC SEAL 10- 4540 - 560 -56 36948 1428 104.52 AUTO WHSL WEST INC SEAL /SNAP RING 10- 4540 - 560 -56 38059 1409 9.10 AUTO WHSL WEST INC SPRAY 10- 4540- 560 -56 38066 1409 115.94 * 50.30 A M LEONARD INC SAW 10- 4580- 646 -64 114227 1165 50.30 * 374.45 MN EQUIPMENT CO SANDBLAST KIT 40- 4580 - 801 -80 4761 1400 374.45 * 33.83 KENT MOORE TOOL GRO HYDROMETER FLOAT 10- 4580 - 560 -56 558105 1290 33.83 * 240.00 TREES INC TREE TRANSPLANT 27- 4288 - 664 -66 1119 240.00 * 35.00 METRO LEGAL SERVICES ABSTRACT SEARCH 11- 4201 - 127 -12 1457 35.00 * 500.00 LYNN HALONEN TREE PRUNING 30- 4504 - 782 -78 500.00 * 100.00 MIKAEL RUDOLPH PERFORMANCE 2/19/91 30- 4224 - 781 -78 100.00 * 6,315.00 GAGNON INC INSULATION 10- 4201 - 500 -50 10889 9880 6,315.00 * i 145.66 HARMON GLASS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 9956 990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -19 -90 PAGE 2 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 145.66 * 23715 11/05/90 307.01 SUSAN FRAME COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 916449 1542 307.01 * 23 16 11/05/90 64.50 EAGLE ELEVATOR CORP ELEVATOR REPAIR 10- 4248 - 520 -52 1303 23 16 11/05/90 287.00 EAGLE ELEVATOR CORP ELEVATOR REPAIR 10- 4248 - 520 -52 1156 1628 23716 11/05/90 130.14 EAGLE ELEVATOR CORP ELEVATOR REPAIR 10- 4248 - 520 -52 1157 1628 481.64* -Hh- r4 * 23717 11/05/90 338.87 MN UC FUND UNEMPLOYMENT 10- 4160 - 510 -51 338.87 * 23718 11/05/90 3,573.00 SHHSC HUMAN SERVICES 10- 4201 - 508 -50 3,573.00 * 9875 29949 23719 if/85/98 11/05/90 64.58 7' FAST FRAME FAST FRAME MA!NfENEeEANeE ART CENTER /FRAME ie-4248 520 52 10- 4504- 627 -62 ±909 276264 73.95 * 23720 11/05/90 750.00 KAEDING & ASSO INC PRO SERVICES 10- 4201 - 420 -42 1620' 23720 11/09/90 750.00 KAEDING & ASSO INC EQUIP REPLACE 10- 4901 - 420 -42- 1620 1,500.00 * 23721 11/05/90 60.00 PHP AMBULANCE REFUND 10- 3180 - 000 -00 60.00 * 23722 11/05/90 617.00 ANDERBERG -LUND PRINTING 30- 4600 - 781 -78 037431 1677 617.00 * * * * ** * * * -CKS 23724 11/05/90 12.95 INDEPENDENT LIVING MAGNIFIERS 10- 4504 - 180 -18 033958 1029 12.95 * 23725 11/05/90 1,495.00 EEC ODOR NEUTRALIZER GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 0501 1572 1,495.00 * 23726 11/07/90 2.81 REBEKAH WIESE MILEAGE 40- 4208 - 806 -80 2.81 * 23727 11/07/90 48.00 METRO COUNCIL AIR PHOTOS 10- 4502 - 140 -14 48.00 * 23728 11/07/90 50.98 NORTHLAND AIT FILTER CLEANING SUPPLIES 30- 4512 - 782 -78 15646 1216 50.98 * 23729 11/07/90 30.00 LISA FINSNESS REFUND 30- 3505 - 000 -00 30.00 * 23730 11/07/90 306.54 MICHAUD COOLEY ENG SERV 30- 4201 - 781 -78 24279 306.54 * 23731 11/07/90 131.35 JAY BRASK UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 420 -42 131.35 * 23732 11/07/90 5,251.00 MILLS ADVERTISING MAG EXP 12- 4215- 434 -43 z 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 323733 323733 323733 323734 323734 323735 323736 323737 323738 323739 323740 323741 323742 323743 323744 323745 323746 323747 323748 323749 11/07/90 11/07/90 11/07/90 11/07/90 11/07/90 11/07/90 11/07/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 11/08/90 AMOUNT 5,251.00 * 20.00 20.00 20.00 60.00 * 3,339.50 61.50 3,401.00 * 46.50 46.50 * 61.33 61.33 * 195.50 195.50 * 86.21 86.21 * 437.40 437.40 * 30.20 30.20 * 167.00 167.00 * 1,650.00 1,650.00 * 43.72 43.72 * 50.00 50.00 * 50.00 50.00 * 100.00 100.00 * 25.00 25.00 * 45.00 45.00 * 45.00 45.00 * CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION CHEQUE OF MN INC CHEQUE OF MN INC CHEQUE OF MN INC MN STATE MN STATE DAVID BLOOD ECONOMIC PRESS CONT CLAY CO BLOOMINGTON CERAMICS GTE SUN COMMUNITY MN TRUCKING ASSOC MN PETRO SERV INC DEVITT CO INC CYBEX ROYAL SIL -O -ETS PAT FUHR CAROL MCCORMICK HELEN ZABEL ADRIANE BRUMFIELD 806 CONNOLLY ANNUAL FEE ANNUAL FEE ANNUAL FEE STATE SURCHARGE STATE SURCHARGE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE RENEWAL COST /GOODS SOLD CRAFT SUPPLIES ADVERTISING GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS ADVERTISING REPAIR PARTS PERFORMACE 11/23/90 PERFORMANCE 11/10/90 PERFORMANCEI /10/91 DEC 8TH PROGRAM DEC 16TH PROGRAM DEC 16TH•PR0GRAM 11 -19 -90 PAGE 3 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 4201 - 820 -82 10833 50- 4201 - 840 -84 10834 50- 4201 - 860 -86 10835 10- 3095 - 490 -49 10- 3113 - 490 -49 10- 4266 - 420 -42 10- 4204 - 440 -44 23- 4624 - 613 -61 001192 1374 23- 4588 - 611 -61 1663 1203 23- 4214 - 611 -61 10- 4504 - 560 -56 11938 1423 10- 4540 - 540 -54 25964 1580 30- 4214 - 781 -78 1552 30- 4540 - 782 -78 283915 1519 30 -4224- 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 323750 11/08/90 50.00 MARILYN HALL DEC 20TH PROGRAM ` 50.00 * 323751 11/08/90 25.00 JANE KANJANAVAVITCH DEC 23RD PROGRAM 25.00 * 323752 11/08/90 25.00 BILL DIETRICHSON DEC 30TH PROGRAM 25.00 * 323753 11/08/90 25.00 EVIE HOLMQUIST 1/3/91 PROGRAM 25.00 * .'323754 11/08/90 25.00 AGNES FINE 1/10/91 PROGRAM 25.00 * 323755 11/08/90 25.00 HELEN ZABEL 1/12/91 VA PROGRAM 25.00 * 323756 11/08/90 25.00 BOB CONNOLLY 1/21/91 VA PROGRAM 25.00 * 323757 11/08/90 25.00 MARIAN ALSTAD 1/22/91 VA PROGRAM 25.00 * 323758 11/08/90 25.00 ADRIANE BRUMFIELD 1/31/91 VA PROGRAM 25.00 * 323759 11/08/90 60.00 ISFSI DUES 60.00 * 323760 11/08/90 47.50 WALDEN BROS LUMBER LUMBER 47.50 * 323761 11/08/90 92.28 BUDGET LIGHTING REPAIRS 92.28 * 323762 11/08/90 225.00 ISIA DUES 225.00 * 323763 11/08/90 155.00 GCSAA SCHOOL 155.00 * 323764 11/09/90 277,704.76 ELECTRIC SERVICE CO PAYMENT 277,704.76 * 323765 11/09/90 6,133.68 DMJ CORP PAYMANT 6,133.68 * 323766 11/09/90 580.08 AMERIDATA PRO SERVICE 580.08 * 323767 11/09/90 120.00 CSC CREDIT SERV INC DUES 120.00 * 323768 11/09/90 150.00 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL TELETYPE t' 11 -19 -90 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 10- 4204 - 440 -44 10- 4604- 644 -64 7325 1322 28- 4248 - 702 -70 18167 1131 28- 4204 - 701 -70 026885 27- 4202 - 661 -66 60- 2040 - 000 -00 90 -10 60- 2040 - 000 -00 90 -11 10- 4201 - 460 -46 247607 10- 4204 - 420 -42 10- 4268 - 420 -42 4 11 -19 -90 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4268 - 420 -42 90Q316 10- 4202 - 420 -42 10- 4502 - 420 -42 871409 10- 4901 - 420 -42 4066 1311 10- 4901 - 420 -Q2 134985 1236 40- 4204 - 803 -80 10- 4901 - 420 -42 1235, 60- 2040 - 000 -00 90 -9 30- 4201 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4201 - 782 -78 10- 3500 - 000 -00 10- 3500 - 000 -00 10- 3500 - 000 -00 10- 3500 - 000 -00 10- 4310 - 840 -84 10- 4504 - 510 -51 32921 1629 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 5 e 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 323768 11/09/90 180.00 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL TELETYPE 330.00 * 323769 11/09/90 45.00 MIJJ TRAINING 45.00 * 323770 11/09/90 38.05 CALLAGHAN & CO BOOKS 38.05 * 323771 11/09/90 567.00 ALEXANDER BATTERY N EQUIPMENT REPLACE 567.00 * 323772 11/09/90 793.23 OLSON GRAPHIC PROD EQUIP REPLACE 793.23 * 323773 11/09/90 69.00 AWWA MEMBERSHIP 69.00 * 323774 11/09/90 584.90 SIRCHIE EQUIP REPLACE 584.90 * 323775 11/09/90 30,998.04 NORTHWST ASPHALT INC PAYMENT 30,998.04 * 323776 11/13/90 766.48 PAT GREER SERVICES 12 -90 766.48 * 323777 11/13/90 600.00 ESPECIALLY FOR RENTAL 600.00 * 323778 11/13/90 380.00 C WAYNE COURTNEY SERVICES 380.00 * 323779 11/13/90 120.00 MN DEPT OF NATL FIREARM SAFETY 120.00 * 323.780 11/13/90 125.00 MN DEPT OF NATL FIREARM SAFETY 125.00 * 323781 11/13/90 125.00 MN DEPT OF NATL FIREARM SAFETY 125.00 * 323782 11/13/90 100.00 MN DEPT OF NATL FIREARM SAFETY 1U0.00 * 323783 11/13/90 12.00 MN DEPT OF RETAILERS CARD 12.00 * 323784 11/13/90 366.08 FAX NETWORKS FAX PAPER 366.08 * 323785 11/13/90 168.00 PHYLLIS HAYWA AC INSTRUCTOR 168.00 * 323786 11/13/90 134.00 TARA CARMICHAEL AC INSTRUCTOR 11 -19 -90 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4268 - 420 -42 90Q316 10- 4202 - 420 -42 10- 4502 - 420 -42 871409 10- 4901 - 420 -42 4066 1311 10- 4901 - 420 -Q2 134985 1236 40- 4204 - 803 -80 10- 4901 - 420 -42 1235, 60- 2040 - 000 -00 90 -9 30- 4201 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4201 - 782 -78 10- 3500 - 000 -00 10- 3500 - 000 -00 10- 3500 - 000 -00 10- 3500 - 000 -00 10- 4310 - 840 -84 10- 4504 - 510 -51 32921 1629 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 5 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 11/1'3/90 11/13/90 11/13/90 11/13/90 11/13/90 11/13/90 11/13/90 11/13/90 11/13/90 11/13/90 11/13/90 11/13/90 11/13/90 11/13/90 11/13/90 11/13/90 11/13/90 11/13/90 11/13/90 11/13/90 AMOUNT 134.00 450.00 450.00 * 535.00 535.00 * 83.00 83.00 * 28.00 28.00 * 180.00 180.00 * 360.00 360.00 * 180.00 180.00 * 168.00 168.00 * 192.00 192.00 * 30.00 168.00 198.00 * 168.00 168.00 * 540.00 540.00 * 90.00 90.00 * 838.00 838.00 * 221.50 221.50 * 340.00 522.50 862.50 * 408.00 408.00 * 162.00 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION PAT GEISHEKER BRADLEY BENN ADRIANE BRUMFIELD SUZIE KELM NICK LEGEROS SUSAN FRAME MELANIE GADEN CYD WICKER DOROTHY ODLAND BETSY BRYANT BETSY BRYANT PHYLLIS PETERSON JEAN GRAPP BOB CONNOLLY MARIAN ALSTAD MARGARET GUST MONICA RUDQUIST MONICA RUDQUIST BILL DIETRICHSON TOBIE DICKER AC INSTRUCTOR AC RENNOVATION AC INSTRUCTOR' AC INSTRUCTOR AC INSTRUCTOR AC INSTRUCTOR PT MAINT AC AC INSTRUCTOR AC INSTRUCTOR PT MAINT AC AC INSTRUCTOR AC INSTRUCTOR AC INSTRUCTOR AC INSTRUCTOR AC INSTRUCTOR AC INSTRUCTOR PT MAINT AC AC INSTRUCTOR AC INSTRUCTOR PT MAINT AC 11-19 -90 PAGE 6 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 23- 4201 - 611 -61 25- 4942 - 001 -23 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201- 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4120 - 612 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4120 - 612 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4120 - 612 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4120 - 612 -61 1990 CITY OF EDINA ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 323804 11/13/90 745.00 TOBIE DICKER AC INSTRUCTOR 10- 4208 - 180 -18 907.00 * 10- 4208 - 180 -18 323805 11/13/90 225.00 HARRY HEIM AC INSTRUCTOR 10- 4208 - 180 -18 225.00 * 10- 4208 - 180 -18 323806 11/13/90 115.92 JAMES E ROBINSON MEETING EXP 27- 4516 - 661 -66 66631 1783 115.92 * 27- 4516 - 661 -66 323807 11/13/90 252.00 KATHLEEN SCHNEIDER AMBULANCE REFUND 30- 4504 - 783 -78 252.00 * 323808 11/13/90 100.00 EDINA POLOCE SERVICES 100.00 * 323809 11/13/90 473.51 HOWARD NORBACK TECH SERVICES 323809 11/13/90 43.86 HOWARD NORBACK MILEAGE 517.37 * 323810 11/13/90 189.83 RICHARD HERKEL ELECTION SERVICES 323810 11/13/90 13.26 RICHARD HERKEL MILEAGE 203.09 * 323811 11/13/90 1,318.59 FLORENCE NORBACK ELECTION SERVICES 323811 11/13/90 14.28 FLORENCE NORBACK MILEAGE 1,332.87 * 323812 11/13/90 3.57 BARBARA HERBERS MILEAGE 3.57 * 323813 11/13/90 5.10 HELEN PETERSON MILEAGE 5.10 * 323814 11/13/90 3.57 CAROL MCPHEETERS MILEAGE 3.57 * 323815 11/13/90 100.00 EXPLORERS POST 925 ELECTION SERVICES 100.00 * 323816 11/13/90 320.00 JOHNSON WROUGHT IRON CONSTRUCTION 320.00 * 323817 11/13/90 107.70 IDENTIFICATION SERV MANE TAGS 323817 11/13/90 107.70 IDENTIFICATION SERV NAME TAGS 323817 11/13/90 107.70- IDENTIFICATION SERV MANE TAGS 107.70 * 323818 11/13/90 23.00 IDELLES INTER DESIGN REPAIRS 323818 11/13/90 468.00 IDELLES INTER DESIGN GENERAL SUPPLIES 491.00 * 323819 11/13/90 200.00 DAVE GUSTAFSON GENERAL SUPPLIES 200.00 * 323820 11/13/90 23.79 CINDY WAKNITZ MILEAGE 7 11 -19 -90 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 10- 4206 - 440 -44 10- 3180 - 000 -00 10- 4201 - 180 -18 10- 4201 - 180 -18 10- 4208 - 180 -18 10- 4201 - 180 -18 10- 4208 - 180 -18 10- 4201 - 180 -18 10- 4208 - 180 -18 10- 4208 - 180 -18 10- 4208 - 180 -18 10- 4208 - 180 -18 10- 4201 - 180 -18 27- 1300 - 005 -00 27- 4516 - 661 -66 66631 1783 27- 4516 - 661 -66 66631 1783 27- 4516 - 661 -66 66631 1783 30- 4248 - 783 -78 30- 4504 - 783 -78 30- 4504 - 783 -78 30- 4208 - 781 -78 7 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 11/19/90 11/13/90 11/13/90 11/13/90 11/13/90 11/13/90 11/13/90 11/13/90 11/13/90 11/13/90 11/13/90 11/13/90 11/13/90 11/13/90 11/13/90 11/13/90 11/13/90 AMOUNT 23.79 * 75.00 75.00 * 35.00 35.00 * 185.00 185.00 * 425.90 425.90 * 132.60 132.60 * 15.30 15.30 * 950.00 950.00 * 19,204.80 19,204.80 * 465.00 465.00 * 1,672.88 1,672.88 * 91.41 91.41 * 37.66 37.66 * 24.28 24.28 * 29.81 29.81 * 5.00 5.00 * 50.49 50.49 * 15.51 15.51 * CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION INDRANI MALLICK SHIRLEY OLSON PUBLIC RISK MGMT ARNOLD ALBEN INC ESSCO CARPETS CF ANDERSON CO DELANO ERICKSON ARCH CONCRETE DESIGN LE KOLLMEYER ARCH KUNDE CO GLADYS PITZ BURNET REALTY RON CLARK CONSTR BRETT BOOS GERALD COLEMAN MICHAEL CORCORAN DAVID HORNIG 11/13/90 23.89 GAIL BERKELEY PERFORMANCE 11/29/90 PERFORMANCE 12/27/90 DUES COST /GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES BP UNIT SERVICE CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION OAK WILT PROGRAM REFUND REFUND REFUND REFUND REFUND REFUND REFUND REFUND 11 -19 -90 PAGE 8 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 10- 4204 - 140 -14 0454 30- 4624 - 783 -78 58944 1792 30- 4504 - 784 -78 03586 1525 10- 4510 - 440 -44 60- 1300 - 021 -20 60- 1300 - 020 -20 60- 1300 - 020 -20 10- 4248 - 644 -64 40- 3800 - 000 -00 40- 3800 - 000 -00 40- 3800 - 000 -00 40- 3800 - 000 -00 40- 3800 - 000 -00 40- 3800 - 000 -00 40- 3800 - 000 -00 40- 3800 - 000 -00 * * * -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 323840 .11/13/90 10- 4642 - 301 -30 7094 ::::o*: 11/07/90 k k k k k k 1293 323A09 11/09/90 k* R k k k 10- 4642 - 560 -56 323A19 11/07/90 323A19 11/13/90 kkkkkk 323A29 11/13/90 323A29 11/08/90 kk *kkk 323A39 11/08/90 323A39 11/08/90 323A39 11/08/90 323A39 11/05/90 323A39 11/05/90 323A39 11/08/90 kkkkkk 323A49 11/05/90 323A49 11/05/90 323A49 11/05/90 323A49 11/08/90 323A49 11/05/90 323A49 11/05/90 323A49 11/05/90 k k k k k k 323A54 11/05/90 kkkkkk 323A57 11/08/90 AMOUNT 23.89 * 4,462.00 4,462.00 * 290.00 290.00 * 4,053.98 4,053.98 * 144.31 585.20 729.51 * 473.54 251.35 724.89 * 194.80 43.13 76.02 198.46 94.74 36.40 643.55 262.53 11.00 144.57 50.86 56.64 56.47 20.00 602.07 39.75 39.75 478.37 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ENGCO CONSTRU CO CONSTRUCTION 50 & FRANCE BUS ASSN ANNUAL DUES AAA ADVON ADVON ALBINSON ALBINSON ALTERNATOR REBUILD ALTERNATOR REBUILD ALTERNATOR REBUILD ALTERNATOR REBUILD ALTERNATOR REBUILD ALTERNATOR REBUILD AMERICAN LINEN AMERICAN LINEN AMERICAN LINEN AMERICAN LINEN AMERICAN LINEN AMERICAN LINEN AMERICAN LINEN AAGARD AMMONIA HOUSE AUTO REG GENERAL SUPPLIES C 0 G S DRAFTING MATERIALS PEN POINTS GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS FACE SHIELD SAFETY EQUIPMENT SAFETY EQUIPMENT HEARING PROTECTOR 11 -19 -90 PAGE 9 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 60- 1300 - 021 -20. kkk -CKS 50- 4202 - 820 -82 * ** -CKS 10- 4310 - 560 -56 * ** -CKS 30- 4504 - 783 -78 897349 1684 30- 4624 - 783 -78 897207 1791, * ** -CKS 10- 4570 - 260 -26 693767 5352 10- 4570 - 260 -26 693266 5352 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 440 -44 7093 1486 10- 4580 - 301 -30 7095 1501 10- 4642 - 301 -30 7094 1408 10- 4642 - 560 -56 7085 1293 10- 4642 - 560 -56 7090 1408 10- 4642 - 560 -56 7096 1509 * ** -CKS LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LINEN LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 440 -44 10- 4262 - 482 -48 10- 4262 - 520 -52 27- 4262 - 663 -66 5515 50- 4262 - 821 -82 50- 4262 - 841 -84 50- 4262 - 861 -86 * ** -CKS CARDBOARD RECYCLING 50- 4250 - 861 -86 * ** -CKS REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 704 -70 018431 1442 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -19 -90 PAGE 10 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 478.37 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323A99 11/13/90 19.65 AXT -LYLE CONCESSIONS 29- 4624- 722 -72 19.65 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323602 11/08/90 5.00 BFI PORTABLE SERV RUBBISH REMOVAL 27- 4250 - 662 -66 5.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323B14 11/05/90 31.30 BOYER TRUCK PARTS BRACKET 10- 4540 - 560 -56 873671 1335 31.30 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323B17 11/13/90 33,785.15 BFI RECYCLING SYS RECYCLING CONTRACT 10- 4226 - 507 -50 323617 11/13/90 182.40 BFI RECYCLING SYS RECYCLING 10- 4226 - 507 -50 10283 33,967.55 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323B22 11/08/90 470.20 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 27- 4630 - 663 -66 5505 323B22 11/08/90 452.15 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 50- 4630 - 822 -82 - 323822 11/08/90 2,207.85 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 50- 4630 - 842 -84 323B22 11/08/90 1,913.95 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 50- 4630 - 862 -86 5,044.15 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323B25 11/05/90 100.00 BENNETT -WAYNE POLICE SERVICES 10- 4100 - 430 -42 100.00 * 323026 11/13/90 235.20 BERG & FARNHAM CO. LIQUOR DELIVERY 50- 4626 - 822 -82 323826 11/13/90 380.10 BERG & FARNHAM CO. LIQUOR DELIVERY 50- 4626- 842 -84 323B26 11/13/90 375.38 BERG & FARNHAM CO. LIQUOR DELIVERY 50- 4626- 862 -86 990.68 * * ** -CKS 323830 11/13/90 11.42 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 440 -44 618267 323B30 11/13/90 106.47 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 618267 323630 11/05/90 70.85 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 510 -51 616091 323B30 11/07/90 5.52 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 607256 323B30 11/13/90 42.49 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIE 10- 4516 - 440 -44 617145 1045 323B30 11/08/90 236.00 BERTELSON BROS. INC. FIX /FURN 23- 1330 - 000 -00 613321 1376 472.75 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323B32 11/08/90 23.39 BEST LOCK OF MPLS LOCKS 27- 4540 - 666 -66 9358 1698 23.39 * 1990 CITY OF EDINA 10- 4504 - 180 -18 1541 CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION * * * * ** * ** -CKS 10- 4210 - 140 -14 323B62 11/05/90 33.83 BOYUM EQUIPMENT FASTENERS 10- 4201 - 480 -48 12002 33.83 * 27- 4258 - 662 -66 30- 4258 - 782 -78 323870 11/13/90 874.72 BARRETT MOV /STORE VOTING EQUIP MOVED 874.72 * * * * * ** 323B76 11/13/90 194.00 BRANDOW - HOWARD INC. INSURANCE * * * * ** 194.00 * 323881 11/05/90 3,231.83 BRW INC. CONSTRUCTION 3,231.83 * 323B82 11/05/90 34.26 BRUNSON INSTRUMENT PENCILS %LEAD 34.26 * * * * * ** 323B93 11/13/90 306.26 BRC ELECT /MIDWEST ELECTION SUPPLIES 306.26 * * * * * ** 323C18 11/05/90 35.00 CEDAR LAKE FLORAL FLOWERS 323C18 11/07/90 29.00 CEDAR LAKE FLORAL GENERAL SUPPLIES 64.00 * * * * * ** 323C25 11/08/90 76.00 CHAPIN PUBLISHING AD FOR BIDS 76.00 * * * * * ** 323C30 11/07/90 155.00 CITY BEER BEER 323C30 11/08/90 118.40 CITY BEER BEER 273.40 * 323C31 11/05/90 27,972.25 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON HEALTH SERVICES 27,972.25 * 323C32 11/05/90 77.52 FRAN CALLAHAN MILEAGE /OCT 77.52 * 323C33 11/07/90 174.17 CITY OF EDINA WATER 323C33 11/13/90 687.57 CITY OF EDINA WATER 861.74 * 11 -19 -90 PAGE 11 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 5895 1092 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 180 -18 * ** -CKS 10- 4260 - 510 -51 * ** -CKS 27- 1300 - 003 -00 59840 10- 4504 - 260 -26 082058 5353 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 180 -18 1541 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 100 -10 530819 1627 30- 4504 - 781 -78 531417 1687 * ** -CKS 10- 4210 - 140 -14 * ** -CKS 50- 4630 - 842 -84 50- 4630 - 862 -86 10- 4201 - 480 -48 12002 10- 4208 - 480 -48 27- 4258 - 662 -66 30- 4258 - 782 -78 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -19 -90 PAGE 12 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 323C34 11/09/90 42.32 CITY OF RICHFIELD LIGHT /POWER 41- 4252 - 900 -90 1872 ` 42.32 * ** * ** * ** -CKS 323C36 11/07/90 12.25 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV WINDOW CLEANING 50- 4248 - 821 -82 14175 323C36 11/07/90 12.25 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV WINDOW CLEANING 50- 4248 - 841 -84 14176 323C36 11/07/90 12.25 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV WINDOW CLEANING 50- 4248 - 861 -86 14177 36.75 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323C44 11/08/90 115.00 COCA COLA BOTTLING COKE 27- 4624 - 662 -66 5507 323044 11/08/90 581.50 COCA COLA BOTTLING COST OF GOODS 28- 4624 - 703 -70 1388 323C44 11/07/90 253.49 COCA COLA BOTTLING MIX 50- 4632 - 822 -82 323C44 11/07/90 715.93 COCA COLA BOTTLING MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 323044 11/13/90 580.99 COCA COLA BOTTLING MIX 50- 4632- 862 -86 2,246.91 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323049 11/13/90 110.00 COMPUTERLAND ON SITE LABOR 10- 4288 - 510 -51 323C49 11/13/90 147.50 COMPUTERLAND ON SITE LABOR 10- 4288 - 510 -51 257.50 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323C51 11/07/90 589.60 COMM OF REVENUE FUEL TAX 10- 4612- 560 -56 002068 589.60 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323C60 11/05/90 48.00 CONSTR FASTENING SYS ADAPTOR 10- 4580 - 301 -30 14597 1490 48.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323C64 11/08/90 187.12 SYSCO MINNESOTA SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 663 -66 5510 323064 11/08/90 68.53 SYSCO MINNESOTA CLEANING SUPPLIES 27- 4512 - 663 -66 5510 323064 11/08/90 1,241.72 SYSCO MINNESOTA CONCESSIONS 27- 4624 - 663 -66 5510 1,497.37 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323C87 11/09/90 550.64 CURTIN MATHESON SCI LAB SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 482 -48 1421 323C87 11/08/90 428.75 CURTIN MATHESON SCI LAB SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 482 -48 1412 979.39 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323C89 11/05/90 23.55 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 46185 1370 23.55 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA * ** -CKS CHECK REGISTER 165775 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 323C92 11/13/90 870.00 CUSTOM FIRE APP MAINT 323C92 11/13/90 290.00 CUSTOM FIRE APP MAINT 323C92 11/13/90 429.65 CUSTOM FIRE APP REPAIR PARTS 323C92 11/13/90 231.62 CUSTOM FIRE APP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4201 - 647 -64 14863 7094 1,821.27 * 323C93 11/05/90 28.51 CERT HYD SPEC CABLE 28.51 * kkkkkk 323D27 11/08/90 176.52 DAVE S FOOD WAGON DAIRY .176.52 * kkkkkk 323D29 11/08/90 196.35 DAVIDSEN DIST. INC. BEER 196.35 k k k k k k 323D37 11/13/90 35.23 DAY - TIMERS INC. SUPPLIES 35.23 * kkkkkk 323D47 11/13/90 16.83 DEPENDABLE COURIER DELIVERY FEE 16.83 * k k k k k k 323D61 11/05/90 100.00 DICK NISSEN POLICE SERVICES 100.00 * Rkkkkk 323D78 11/13/90 5,718.88 DEDE HENSEL SERVICES 5,718.88 * kkk� *k 323D98 11/07/90 600.00 DCA INC PLAN DOCUMENT 323D98 11/07/90 750.75 DCA INC FEE FOR SERVICE 1,350.75 * k k k k k k 323E02 11/05/90 537.92 E KRAEMER & SONS INC CLASS 2 ROCK 537.92 * kkkkkk 323E17 11/07/90 3,780.25 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER 323E17 11/07/90 8,599.70 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER ACCOUNT NO. IN 10- 4274 - 440 -44 10- 4274 - 440 -44 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10- 4540 - 560 -56 27- 4624- 663 -66 50- 4630 - 842 -84 10 -4504- 140 -14 11 -19 -90 PAGE 13 V. # P.O. # MESSAGE 003247 003246 1051 003247 003246 1051 79816 1291 * ** -CKS 5508 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 10- 4290 - 510 -51 165775 * ** -CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 28- 4224 - 701 -70 * ** -CKS 10- 4156 - 510 -51 41312 10- 4156- 510 -51 40053' * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 647 -64 14863 7094 * ** -CKS 50- 4630 - 822 -82 50- 4630 - 842 -84 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 323E17 11/08/90 * * * * ** GENERAL SUPPLIES 323E57 11/08/90 * * * * ** INSURANCE 323E94 11/08/90 * * * * * * INSURANCE 323F56 11/13/90 323F56 11/13/90 323F56 11/09/90 * * * * * * 323G01 11/07/90 323G01 11/07/90 323G01 11/07/90 323G01 11/07/90 323G01 11/07/90 323G01 11/07/90 323G01 11/07/90 323G02 11/13/90 * * * * ** TARGETS .323G32 11/07/90 * * * * ** 323G38 11/05/90 * * * * ** 323G42 11/05/90 323G42 11/05/90 * * * * ** 323G88 11/13/90 * * * * ** AMOUNT 7,922.11 20,302.06 * 112.88 112.88 * 3,990.00 3,990.00 * 22.00 614.00 3,626.00 4,262.00 * 1,101.84 201.80 207.83 208.86 89.20 19.60 313.70 2,142.83 * 1,205.00 1,205.00 * 742.50 742.50 * 100.00 100.00 * 326.61 189.00 •515.61 26.00 26.00 CHECK REGISTER * ** -CKS VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER E -Z SHARP INC GENERAL SUPPLIES ESS BROS & SONS STORM SEWER GRATES FRANK B. HALL & CO. INSURANCE FRANK B. HALL & CO. INSURANCE FRANK B. HALL & CO. INSURANCE G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY G & K SERVICES CLEANING SUPPLIES G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY LIZ GEREBI SERVICE GOPHER STATE 1 CALL UTIL LOCATES GEORGE BUTLER POLICE SERVICES GIL HEBARD GUNS AMMO GIL HEBARD GUNS TARGETS GRUBER POWER EQUIP REPAIR PARTS 11 -19 -90 PAGE 14 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 4630- 862 -86 * ** -CKS 28- 4504 - 702 -70 7952 1255 * ** -CKS 41- 4552- 900 -90 3002 1569 * ** -CKS 10 -4260- 510 -51 10- 4260 - 510 -51 10- 4260 - 510 -51 058253 * ** -CKS 10- 4262 - 301 -30 10- 4262 - 560 -56 10- 4262 - 646 -64 10- 4512 - 540 -54 28- 4262 - 702 -70 30- 4262- 782 -78 40- 4262 - 801 -80 30- 3505 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 10- 4318 - 280 -28 * ** -CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 29- 4572 - 722 -72 36820 1471 29- 4648 - 722 -72 36820 1471 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 9993 1731 * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 323H21 11/08/90 134.93 HARMON GLASS WINDSHIELD 134.93 * 323H22 11/05/90 100.00 HAROLD SWANSON POLICE SERVICES 100.00 * 323H23. 11/13/90 10,392.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. INSURANCE 323H23 11/13/90 28,377.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. INSURANCE 323H23 11/13/90 10,392.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. INSURANCE 323H23 11/13/90 4,863.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. INSURANCE 323H23 11/13/90 28,377.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. INSURANCE 323H23 .11/13/90 4,863.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. INSURANCE 87,264.00 * * * * * ** 323H36 11/13/90 305.73 HENN CTY MED CENTER AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 305.73 * 323H37 11/13/90 105.00 HENN TECH CENTER SCHOOL 105.00 * * * * * ** 323H61 11/09/90 1,730.58- HOFFERS INC GLASS REPAIR 323H61 11/09/90 1,730.58 HOFFERS INC GLASS REPAIR 323H61 11/09/90 1,730.58 HOFFERS INC GLASS REPAIR 1,730.58 * * * * * ** 323H65 11/05/90 100.00 HOFFMAN- WILLIAM POLICE SERVICES 100.00 * * * * * ** 323H74 11/09/90 8.48 HOOTEN CLEANERS LAUNDRY 8.48 * * * * * ** 323H85 11/05/90 26.50 HUMPHREY RADIATOR CONTRACTED REPAIRS 26.50 * * * * * ** 323I59 11/05/90 79.45 INTERIOR COM SYS. PHONE REPAIRS 323I59 11/05/90 79.45- INTERIOR COM SYS. PHONE REPAIRS 323I59 11/05/90 79.45 INTERIOR COM SYS. PHONE.REPAIRS 323I59 11/13/90 266.45 INTERIOR COM SYS. PHONE REPLACE 345.90 * * ** ** 323I61 11/08/90 9.10 INTERSTATE TIMING GAUGE 11 -19 -90 PAGE 15 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4248 - 560 -56 1515 10- 4100 - 430 -42 10- 4260 - 510 -51 10- 4260 - 510 -51 10- 4260 - 510 -51 10- 4260- 510 -51 10- 4260 - 510 -51 10- 4260 - 510 -51 10- 4510 - 440 -44 987 5058 10- 4202 - 440 -44 024645 1052 10- 4540 - 373 -30 167034 9275 10- 4540 - 373 -30 167034 9275 10- 4540 - 375 -30 167034 9275 10- 4100 - 430 -42 10- 4262 - 420 -42 10- 4248 - 560 -56 1492 10- 4248 - 490 -49 029688 10- 4248 - 490 -49 029688 10- 4808 - 490 -49 029688 50- 4501 - 820 -82 29593 10- 4580- 560 -56 154821 1422 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 9.10 * * * * ** 323J27 11/08/90 29.91 JERRYS FOODS GENERAL SUPPLIES 29.91 * * * * ** 323J31 11/08/90 13.97 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 323J31 11/08/90 86.04 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 323J31 11/08/90 13.71 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 323J31 11/08/90 10.69 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 323J31 11/08/90 33.22 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 323J31 11/08/90 19.47 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 323J31 11/08/90 118.12 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 323J31 11/08/90 69.68 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 323J31 11/08/90 78.27 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES :323J31 11/08/90 446.99 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 323J31 11/08/90 33.26 JERRYS HARDWARE REPAIR PARTS 323J31 11/08/90 5.90 JERRYS HARDWARE REPAIR PARTS 323J31 11/08/90 60.38 JERRYS HARDWARE REPAIR PARTS 323J31 11/08/90 67.95 JERRYS HARDWARE TOOLS 323J31 11/08/90 38.49 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 323J31 11/08/90 7.47 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 323J31 11/08/90 537.53 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 323J31 11/08/90 32.99 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,674.13 323J35 11/05/90 1.80 JERRYS PRINTING GENERAL SUPPLIES '323J35 11/05/90 168.00 JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING 323J35 11/05/90 483.00 JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING 323J35 11/05/90 267.00 JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING 919.80 323J74 11/08/90 228.60 JUSTUS LUMBER LUMBER 323J74 11/08/90 56.33 JUSTUS LUMBER LUMBER °323J74 11/08/90 32.80 JUSTUS LUMBER LUMBER 323J74 11/08/90 464.33 JUSTUS LUMBER GENERAL SUPPLIES 782.06 * * * * ** 323J99 11/13/90 40.00 JANET CANTON MILEAGE /LOGIS 40.00 * * * * ** 323K09 11/05/90 29.57 KAMAN INDUST TECH PARTS 323K09 11/05/90 24.50 KAMAN INDUST TECH PARTS 54.07 11 -19 -90 PAGE 16 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 23- 4504 - 611 -61 10- 4504- 260 -26 10- 4504 - 301 -30 10- 4504 - 322 -30 10- 4504 - 325 -30 10- 4504 - 390 -39 10- 4504 - 420 -42 10- 4504- 440 -44 10- 4504 - 540 -54 10- 4504 - 560 -56 10- 4504- 646 -64 10- 4540- 520 -52 10- 4540 - 540 -54 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10- 4580 - 644 -64 27- 4504 - 661 -66 30- 4504- 782 -78 40- 4504 - 801 -80 40- 4504 - 802 -80 10- 4504 - 627 -62 10036 23- 4600 - 611 -61 4331 1209 23- 4600- 611 -61 4333 1210 23- 4600 - 611 -61 4332 1209 10- 4604 - 646 -64 66224 1557 30- 4544- 782 -78 66098 1555 30- 4544- 782 -78 63653 1303 40- 4504 - 802 -80 63306 1268 10- 4208 - 160 -16 10- 4620 - 560 -56 1334 10- 4620 - 560 -56 1334 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -19 -90 PAGE 17 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323K23 11/07/90 384.41 KELLY SERVICES INC TEMP HELP 10- 4201 - 180 -18 384.41 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323K35 11/05/90 22.78 KNOX COMM CREDIT PLYWOOD 10- 4504 - 440 -44 598600 1352 323K35 11/08/90 161.10 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 741158 1380 323K35 11/05/90 71.40 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 759898 1341 323K35 11/05/90 4.89- KNOX COMM CREDIT CREDIT 10- 4504 - 646 -64 598558 323K35 11/08/90 445.76 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 741175 1379 .323K35 11/05/90 36.97 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 598557 1351 323K35 11/05/90 419.03 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 746580 1256 323K35 11/08/90 109.00 KNOX COMM CREDIT MATERIAL 10- 4540 - 520 -52 598755 1500 323K35 11/05/90 63.93 KNOX COMM CREDIT PLYWOOD 10- 4540 - 540 -54 712031 1416 323K35 11/05/90 113.44 KNOX COMM CREDIT REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 712218 1397 323K35 11/08/90 14.78 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER 27- 4504 - 662 -66 741026 1675 323K35 11/05/90 70.98 KNOX COMM CREDIT SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 664 -66 740728 1624' 323K35 11/07/90 15.39 KNOX COMM CREDIT WOOD LATH 27- 4504 - 664 -66 740742 1674 323K35 11/08/90 22.52 KNOX COMM CREDIT REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 702 -70 712294 1458 323K35 11/08/90 42.41 KNOX COMM CREDIT REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 702 -70 741005 1610 323K35 11/08/90 38.15 KNOX COMM CREDIT REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 702 -70 711980 1443 323K35 11/08/90 47.84 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 802 -80 740791 1593 323K35 11/05/90 8.67 KNOX COMM CREDIT POLYSTYRENE 40- 4504 - 811 -80 712102 1498 323K35 11/05/90 12.00 KNOX COMM CREDIT POLYSTYRENE 40- 4504 - 811 -80 712123 1499 1,711.26 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323K45 11/08/90 290.00 KOKESH ATHLETIC GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 621 -62 36528 290.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323K57 11/07/90 2,338.65 KUETHER DIST. CO. BEER 50- 4630 - 822 -82 323K57 11/07/90 3,549.50 KUETHER DIST. CO. BEER 50- 4630 - 842 -84 5,888.15 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323L01 11/13/90 735.00 LINDA KOZAK SERV 11/21- 12/4/90 30- 4201 - 781 -78 735.00 * 323L02 11/13/90 1,033.94 LABOR RELATIONS ASN. FEE FOR SERVICE 10- 4201-140 -14 1,033.94 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323L04 11/05/90 76.10 LAHASS RECEPTICAL 10- 4540 - 560 -56 107195 1493 76.10 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323L28 11/05/90 276.50 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 325 -30 1159 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 323L28 11/05/90 323L28 11/05/90 323L28 11/05/90 323L28 11/08/90 323L28 11/05/90 323L28 11/05/90 kkkkkk PUMP BOLTS 323L34 11/13/90 *kkkkk 32306 11/07/90 323L36 11/07/90 kkkkkk 323L38 11/07/90 kkkkkk 323L52 11/13/90 kkkkk k 323L55 11/08/90 323L55 11/13/90 kkkkkk 323L70 11/13/90 kkkkkk 323L97 11/05/90 kkkkkk 323L99 11/05/90 kkkkkk 323M02 11/08/90 323M02 11/08/90 AMOUNT 72.01 78.33 466.18 343.22 276.90 231.24 1,744.38 * 33.75 33.75 * 328.75 498.00 826.75 * 1,072.00 1,072.00 * 386.80 386.80 * 72.00 670.00 742.00 * 125.00 125.00 * 100.00 100.00 * 230.00 230.00 * 69.57 46.71 116.28 * CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION LAWSON PRODUCTS TAPE LAWSON PRODUCTS TOOLS LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERA SUPPLIES LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES LAWSON PRODUCTS PUMP BOLTS LEEF BROS. INC. LAUNDRY LEFFLER PRINTING LEFFLER PRINTING LEITNER COMPANY LINJO ASSOC LINDENSELSER LANDFL LINDENSELSER LANDFL LUCY ROSCHE MERFELD -BERT M & S ROOFING 11 -19-80 PAGE 18 ACCOUNT NO. INV, # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4504 - 560 -56 10- 4580 - 560 -56 10- 4620 - 560 -56 27- 4504 - 664 -66 40- 4504 - 801 -80 40- 4540 - 803 -80 27- 4262 - 664 -66 1161 1160 1160 1431 1157 1158 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS PRINTING 10- 4504 - 510 -51 4346 9861 OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 4379 1683 * ** -CKS TOPDRESSING 27- 4562 - 664 -66 * ** -CKS WATER TREATMENT 30- 4564 - 783 -78 2862 1127 * ** -CKS HAUL BRUSH 10- 4250 - 644 -64 6374 RUBBISH REMOVAL 10- 4250 - 644 -64 * ** -CKS CLEANING 27- 4201 - 662 -66 3060 91461 * ** -CKS POLICE SERVICES 10- 4100 - 430 -42 REPAIR PARTS MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. DUAL SHAFT MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. PARTS * ** -CKS 10- 4540- 540 -54 3058 1489 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 9661 1419 10- 4540 - 560 -56 9703 1292 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE * * * * ** 10- 4504 - 322 -30 323M07 11/07/90 323M07 11/07/90 323M07 11/08/90 * * * * ** 10 -4504- 560 -56 323M13 11/09/90 323M14 11/13/90 323M14 11/05/90 * * * * ** 10- 4540 - 560 -56 323M16 11/07/90 323M16 11/13/90 * * * * ** 323M18 11/08/90 323M19 11/08/90 323M19 11/08/90 323M19 11/08/90 323M19 11/08/90 323M19 11/08/90 323M19 11/08/90 323M19 11/07/90 PIPE 60- 1300 - 299 -04 323M22 11/05/90 323M22 11/13/90 323M22 11/13/90 323M22 11/13/90 * * * * ** 1338 323M27 11/13/90 323M27 11/05/90 323M27 11/05/90 323M27 11/08/90 323M27 11/05/90 323M27 11/13/90 323M27 11/13/90 AMOUNT 4,460.00 9,322.51 8,663.19 22,445.70 2,567.50 2,567.50 * 25.00 25.00 50.00 * 864.50 435.66 1,300.16 244.93 244.93 16.65 42.00 7.38 24.20 3,143.80 669.68 314.59 4,218.30 111.23 424.84 374.08 305.93 1,216.08 464.50 487.15 370.00 467.50 308.55 475.50 376.31 2,949.51 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MATT BULLOCK CONST MAUMA MAUMA MCCAREN DESIGNS MCCAREN DESIGNS MCGARVEY COFFEE MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY MCNEILUS STEEL MCNEILUS STEEL MCNEILUS STEEL MCNEILUS STEEL MERIT SUPPLY MERIT SUPPLY MERIT SUPPLY MERIT SUPPLY MERIT SUPPLY MERIT SUPPLY MERIT SUPPLY BEER BEER BEER 11 -19 -90 PAGE 19 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 50- 4630- 822 -82 50- 4630 - 842 -84 50- 4630 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS REPAIRS 41- 4248 - 902 -90 1326 DUES 10- 4204 - 140 -14 DUES 10- 4204 - 140 -14 * ** -CKS PLANTS 30- 4560 - 782 -78 03746 1314' PLANTS 30- 4560- 782 -78 03876 1795 COFFEE 27- 4624 - 663 -66 91383 7184 GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 322 -30 GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 343 -30 GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 560 -56 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540- 664 -66 STEEL 10- 4620 - 560 -56 23564 1294 ANGLE 60- 1300 - 290 -04 24636 1392 SHEET OF STEEL 60- 1300 - 290 -04 24637 1396 PIPE 60- 1300 - 299 -04 24975 1405 CLEANING SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 645 -64 25556 1642 POLYLINERS /WYP ALLS 10- 4512 - 540 -54 25432 1338 ICE MELT 10- 4520 - 318 -30 25406 1337 PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 25464 1395 CLEANING SUPPLIES 23- 4512 - 612 -61 25369 1267 CLEANING SUPPLIES 30- 4512 - 782 -78 25558 1691 REPAIR PARTS 30- 4540 - 782 -78 25557 1369 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -19 -90 PAGE 20 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323M32 11/07/90 192.13 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632 - 822 -82 1476 323M32 11/05/90 281.64 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632 - 842 -84 1367 323M32 11/07/90 221.76 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632 - 842 -84 1500 323M32 11/13/90 323.76 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632 - 842 -84 1611 323M32 11/07/90 102.25 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632 - 862 -86 1474 323M32 11/13/90 205.24 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632 - 862 -86 1602 1,326.78 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323M35 11/08/90 16,038.00 METRO WASTE CONTROL SAC CHARGE COLLECTED 10- 3095 - 490 -49 16,038.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323M42 11/05/90 78.43 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 314 -30 1007 323M42 11/08/90 107.77 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524- 301 -30 323M42 11/08/90 815.51 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 314 -30 323M42 11/08/90 270.35 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 380 -30 323M42 11/08/90 309.41 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 40- 4524 - 803 -80 1,581.47 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323M46 11/08/90 86.76 METZ BAKING CO BREAD 27- 4624 - 663 -66 5511 323M46 11/08/90 91.48 METZ BAKING CO BREAD 27- 4624- 663 -66 5511 178.24 * * * ** * ** -CKS 323M58 11/05/90 379.54 MILLIPORE LAB SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 482 -48 120311 1420 379.54 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323M63 11/07/90 331.51 MN. BAR MIX 50- 4632 - 822 -82 323M63 11/07/90 631.30 MN. BAR MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 323M63 11/13/90 564.90 MN. BAR MIX 50- 4632- 862 -86 1,527.71 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323M69 11/05/90 59.70 MCC /MIDWEST CRAFT SUPPLIES 23- 4588 - 611 -61 46824 1373 59.70 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323M73 11/13/90 91.10 MN. ELEVATOR SERVICE CONTRACT. 30- 4288 - 782 -78 100436 91.10 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323M80 11/05/90 18.88 MN SUBURBAN NEWS AD FOR BIDS 10- 4210 - 140 -14 89019 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -19 -90 PAGE 21 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 323M80 11/05/90 33.08 MN SUBURBAN NEWS AD FOR BIDS 10- 4210 - 140 -14 89128 323M80 11/05/90 10.03 MN SUBURBAN NEWS NOTICE ACCURACY TEST_ 10- 4210 - 140 -14 89020 323M80 11/05/90 88.32 MN SUBURBAN NEWS SAMPLE BALLOT 10- 4210 - 140 -14 89018 323M80 11/08/90 37.60 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ADVERTISING 2.3- 4214 - 611 -61 126447 323M80 11/13/90 '1,682.00 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ADVERTISING 30- 4600 - 781 -78 21271 1,869.91 * 323M81 11/07/90 21.69 MN. TORO INC. MOWER PARTS 27 -4540- 664 -66 160678 1604 323M81 11/07/90 20.64 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540- 664 -66 160378 1540 42.33 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323M85 11/07/90 104.52 MN. WANNER SPRAYER PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 76604 1634 104.52 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323M90 11/08/90 169.44 MODEL STONE CO. CONCRETE 10- 4528 - 314 -30 102256 7098 323M90 11/05/90 125.00 MODEL STONE CO. CONCRETE 10- 4528 - 314 -30 101904 7098' 323M90 11/05/90 868.75 MODEL STONE CO. CONCRETE 40- 4518- 900 -90 323M90 11/08/90 154.20 MODEL STONE CO. CONCRETE 41- 4528 - 900 -90 102652 7098 1,317.39 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323M98 11/08/90 100.27 MINNEGASCO GAS 10- 4254 - 646 -64 100.27 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323NO3 11/13/90 277.00 MPLS SEWER & WATER CONTRACT REPAIR 40- 4248 - 800 -80 20947 323NO3 11/05/90 900.00 MPLS SEWER & WATER SERVICE REPAIRS 40- 4248 - 801 -80 20929 1497 323NO3 11/05/90 780.00 MPLS SEWER & WATER REPAIR SERVICE LINE 40- 4248 - 801 -80 20924 1507 323NO3 11/13/90 840.00 MPLS SEWER & WATER SERVICE REPAIR 40- 4248 - 803 -80 20946 1694 323NO3 11/13/90 720.00 MPLS SEWER & WATER SERVICE REPAIR 40- 4248 - 803 -80 20943 1774 3,517.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323N07 11/07/90 238.75 MTS NW SOUND SERVICE CONTRACT 30- 4288 - 782 -78 87144 1686 238.75 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323N16 11/13/90 50.27 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 330 -30 323N16 11/13/90 855.05 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 646 -64 323N16 11/08/90 28.72 NSP POWER /LIGHT 40- 4252 - 801 -80 323N16 11/08/90 25.08 NSP POWER /LIGHT 40- 4252 - 801 -80 959.12 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323N21 11/08/90 35.40 NAPA AUTO PARTS GASKETS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 665747 1578 323N21 11/05/90 155.88 NAPA AUTO PARTS SEAT CUSHION 10- 4540- 560 -56 724494 8410 1990 CITY OF EDINA SYS. CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 323N21 11/08/90 9.46 SERVICE NATL 200.74 323N22 11/08/90 146.72 323N22 11/08/90 75.00 323N22 11/08/90 494.99 323N22 11/08/90 117.59 323N22 11/07/90 173.24 323N22 11/07/90 184.78 1,192.32 * * * * ** 323N31 11/08/90 43.40 43.40 * * * * ** 323N68 11/07/90 95.58 323N68 11/07/90 202.50 323N68 11/08/90 241.92 540.00 * * * * ** 323N82 11/08/90 46.20 - 323N82 11/08/90 177.71 131.51 * * * * * ** 323N96 11/07/90 76.00 76.00 * * * * * ** 323N98 11/13/90 506.22 506.22 * 323N99 11/13/90 47.61 323N99 11/13/90 11.69 323N99 11/13/90 49.24 323N99 11/13/90 47.70 156.24 * * * * * ** 323005 11/09/90 282.00 282.00 * * * * * ** 323017 11/13/90 40.00 40.00 * * * * ** CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION NAPA AUTO PARTS GASKETS NATL GUARDIAN SYS. ALARM SERVICE NATL GUARDIAN SYS. ALARM SERVICE NATL GUARDIAN SYS. ALARM NATL GUARDIAN SYS. ALARM SERVICE NATL GUARDIAN SYS. ALARM SERVICE NATL GUARDIAN SYS. ALARM SERVICE NEBCO DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS NORTHSTAR ICE NORTHSTAR ICE NORTHSTAR ICE NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY MINN COMM PAGING NANCY KNUDSON NAOMI JOHNSON NAOMI JOHNSON NAOMI JOHNSON NAOMI JOHNSON OUTPOST HUNT /SPORTS OFFICE PRODUCTS MIX MIX MIX CREDIT COST /GOODS SOLD SERVICE CONTRACT 11 -19 -90 PAGE 22 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 665860 1579 23- 4304 - 612 -61 23- 4304 - 612 -61 27- 4304 - 662 -66 271090 28- 4304 - 702 -70 271092 50- 4304 - 821 -82 271183 50- 4304 - 861 -86 271182 28- 4624 - 703 -70 028605 7070 50- 4632 - 822 -82 50- 4632 - 842 -84 50- 4632 - 862 -86 23- 4624 - 613 -61 177921 23- 4624 - 613 -61 178242 1545 30- 4288 - 781 -78 SERVICE 28- 4224 - 701 -70 AC GENERAL SUPPLIES 23- 4504 - 612 -61 GENERAL SUPPLIES 23- 4504 - 613 -61 OFFICE SUPPLIES 23- 4516- 611 -61 CRAFT SUPPLIES AC 23- 4588 - 611 -61 AMMO /GUN RANGE CABLE 29- 4572 - 722 -72 0115 1472 10- 4504 - 510 -51 124763 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -19 -90 PAGE 23 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 323036 11/05/90 140.00 OLSON CHAIN & CABLE CABLE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 104412 1393 140.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323P11 11/08/90 125.00 PARK NIC MED CTR CONSULTATION 10- 4212 - 510 -51 323P11 11/05/90 144.07 PARK NIC MED CTR PHYSICAL 10- 4246- 420 -42 269.07 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323P30 11/08/90 80.85 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING PEPSI 27- 4624 - 663 -66 5513 323P30 11/13/90 198.49 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING MIX 50- 4632 - 822 -82 323P30 11/08/90 406.77 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING. MIX 50- 4632- 842 -84 323P30 11/13/90 412.69 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING MIX 50- 4632 - 862-86 1,098.80 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323P35 11/13/90 77.14 PETERSON- BARBARA MILEAGE 30- 4208 - 781 -78 323P35 11/13/90 8.34 PETERSON- BARBARA GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504- 781 -78 323P35 11/13/90 69.75 PETERSON- BARBARA OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 323P35 11/13/90 30.10 PETERSON- BARBARA OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 323P35 11/13/90 29.64 PETERSON- BARBARA REPAIR PARTS 30- 4540 - 782 -78 214.97 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323P46 11/05/90 21.84 PIONEER RIM & WHEEL REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 1289 21.84 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323P48 11/08/90 58.50 PIP PRINTING PRINTING 28- 4600 - 701 -70 1623 323P48 11/07/90 125.50 PIP PRINTING PRINTING 30- 4600 - 781 -78 8182 1622 184.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323P58 11/08/90 28.50 PLUNKETTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 702-70 175745 28.50 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323P75 11/13/90 50.00 PREMIER OUTDOOR SERV SERVICE CONTRACT 30- 4288 - 782 -78 1394 1793 50.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323P78 11/08/90 65.00 PRINTERS SERV INC SHARPENING 28- 4274 - 704 -70 55686 65.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323Q01 11/08/90 153.03 QUIK PRINT PRINTING 28- 4600- 701 -70 040082 1535 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -19 -90 PAGE 24 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 153.03 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323Q0S 11/08/90 83.75 QUALITY REFRIG REPAIRS 27- 4288 - 663 -66 72042 1699 83.75 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323Q20 11/05/90 48.72 QUICK SERV BATTERY OIL FILTER 10- 4540 - 560 -56 37412 1175 48.72 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323R05 11/05/90 54.72 R.E. MOONEY & ASSOC REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 3499 1094 54.72 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323R13 11/13/90 132.00 RADIO INSTALLS RADIO LEASE 10- 4226 - 440 -44 19437 5057, 132.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323R21 11/08/90 88.35 RED WING SHOES GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 260 -26 323R21 11/08/90 81.55 RED WING SHOES GENERAL SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 667 -66 169.90 323R22 11/13/90 103.56 REM SUPPLIES RINK GLOVES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 1254 1732 323R22 11/13/90 369.98 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 1068 1784 323R22 11/05/90 174.60 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 01219 323R22 11/07/90 55.44 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 01261 1681 323R22 11/07/90 570.00 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 01262 1695 323R22 11/09/90 423.35 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 1268 7773 323R22 11/13/90 52.82 REM SUPPLIES REPAIRS 30- 4540 - 782 -78 01266 1794 1,749.75 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323R25 11/08/90 28.55 RENTAL EQUIP & SALES SAW REPAIR 10- 4540 - 644 -64 1491 1663 28.55 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323R33 11/13/90 4,855.01 REX DISTR. BEER 50- 4630 - 822 -82 323R33 11/08/90 6,250.50 REX DISTR. BEER 50- 4630 - 842 -84 323R33 11/08/90 5,695.35 REX DISTR. BEER 50- 4630 - 862 -86 16,800.86 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323R53 11/08/90 425.00 ROBERT B. HILL GENERAL SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 702 -70 41689 1451 425.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 323R65 11/09/90 323R65 11/09/90 wwwwww 3,417.00 323R79 11/13/90 323R79 11/13/90 323R79 11/13/90 323R79 11/13/90 wwwwww RTW INC. 323881 11/08/90 wwww ** FEE FOR SERVICE 323R98 11/13/90 wwwwww 2,281.95 323S15 11/05/90 wwwwww RUBENSTEIN & ZIFF 323S19 11/05/90 wwwwww 323S27 11/08/90 323S27 11/08/90 323S27 11/08/90 323S27 11/05/90 wwwwww 7.49 * 323S36 11/07/90 323S36 11/07/90 323S36 11/08/90 www *ww 323S45 11/05/90 THIONNER /KNIVES 68.16 323S50 11/05/90 11 -19 -90 PAGE 25 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4612 - 560 -56 56709 1641 10- 4612 - 560 -56 56712 1641 * ** -CKS 10- 4260 - 510 -51 10- 4260 - 510 -51 10- 4260 - 510 -51 10- 4260 - 510 -51 * ** -CKS 23- 4588 - 611 -61 179281 1546 * ** -CKS 30- 4201 - 781 -78 * ** -CKS 10- 4580- 301 -30 1491 * ** -CKS 40- 4504 - 802 -80 185136 1330 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 335 -30 43618 1283 10- 4504 - 335 -30 43618 1283 10- 4504 - 335 -30 43618 1283 10- 4504 - 646 -64 44933 1331 * ** -CKS 50- 4630 - 822 -82 50- 4630 - 842 -84 50- 4630 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 180 -18 049298 * ** -CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 4,338.00 ROLLINS OIL CO GASOLINE 3,417.00 ROLLINS OIL CO GASOLINE 7,755.00 276.00 RTW INC. FEE FOR SERVICE 637.50 RTW INC. FEE FOR SERVICE 558.45 RTW INC. FEE FOR SERVICE 810.00 RTW INC. FEE FOR SERVICE 2,281.95 42.08 RUBENSTEIN & ZIFF CRAFT SUPPLIES 42.08 96.00 ROXANNE SEIDEL SERVICE 12 -90 96.00 * 7.49 SEARS CORD 7.49 * 141.22 SEELYE PLASTICS PLEXIGLASS 141.22 * 68.16- SHERWIN WILLIAMS THIONNER /KNIVES 68.16 SHERWIN WILLIAMS THIONNER /KNIVES 68.16 SHERWIN WILLIAMS THINNER /KNIVES 37.16 SHERWIN WILLIAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES 105.32 * 2,651.50 SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO. BEER 7,844.85 SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO. BEER 313.00 SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO. BEER 10,809.35 * 14.14 ST. PAUL BOOK GENERAL SUPLLIES 14.14 * 100.00 JOHN SHEPARD POLICE SERVICES 11 -19 -90 PAGE 25 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4612 - 560 -56 56709 1641 10- 4612 - 560 -56 56712 1641 * ** -CKS 10- 4260 - 510 -51 10- 4260 - 510 -51 10- 4260 - 510 -51 10- 4260 - 510 -51 * ** -CKS 23- 4588 - 611 -61 179281 1546 * ** -CKS 30- 4201 - 781 -78 * ** -CKS 10- 4580- 301 -30 1491 * ** -CKS 40- 4504 - 802 -80 185136 1330 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 335 -30 43618 1283 10- 4504 - 335 -30 43618 1283 10- 4504 - 335 -30 43618 1283 10- 4504 - 646 -64 44933 1331 * ** -CKS 50- 4630 - 822 -82 50- 4630 - 842 -84 50- 4630 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 180 -18 049298 * ** -CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE * * * * ** 323554 11/07/90 * * * * ** GRASS 323572 11/09/90 323573 11/13/90 * * * * ** SEED 323577 11/05/90 323577 11/05/90 323S77 11/05/90 323S77 11/08/90 323S77 11/08/90 323S77 11/08/90 323S77 11/08/90 323578 11/05/90 323S78 11/08/90 * * * * ** 323592 11/05/90 * * * * ** 323T05 11/05/90 * * * * ** 323T08 11/07/90 323T09 11/08/90 * * * * ** 323T11 11/08/90 323T11 11/13/90 323T11 11/08/90 323T11 11/08/90 323T11 11/13/90 AMOUNT 100.00 * 311.17 311.17 * 138.25 138.25 * 354.25 354.25 * 270.00 304.92 365.75 47.00 156.00 9.72 95.25 1,248.64 * 83.25 12.53 95.78 * 16.14 16.14 * 723.80 723.80 * 39.94 39.94 * 258.00 258.00 * 330.50 330.50 330.52 330.52- 358.00 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION STAR TRIBUNE STREICHERS STRGAR- ROSCOE -FAUSH SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP SYSTEM SUPPLY THE PRINT SHOP TARGET T.I.P.S. TESSMAN SEED & CHEM TESSMAN SEED & CHEM TESSMAN SEED & CHEM TESSMAN SEED & CHEM TESSMAN SEED & CHEM WANT ADS 11 -19 -90 PAGE 26 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 4212 - 510 -51 * ** -CKS EQUIP REPLACE 10- 4901 - 420 -42 1432 PRO ENG SERV 60- 1300 - 291 -04 901320 BODY REPAIR BODY REPAIR WARRANTY REPAIR CONTROL RECIEVER PARTS PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS NYLON RIBBONS MONTHLY NEWSLETTER GENERAL SUPPLIES SHOPPING SERVICE * ** -CKS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 7223 10- 4248 - 560 -56 7619 10- 4248 - 560 -56 66023 10- 4540 - 560 -56 134792 10- 4540 - 560 -56 134791 10- 4540 - 560 -56 134884 10- 4540 - 560 -56 134943 30- 4504 - 784 -78 1439 30- 4540 - 782 -78 1364 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 540 -54 100529 1389 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 628 -62 15038 1317 10- 4504 - 260 -26 50- 4201 - 861 -86 1105 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS GRASS SEED 10- 4568 - 643 -64 68767 1090 GRASS SEED 10- 4568- 643 -64 69702 1090 GRASS SEED 10- 4568- 643 -64 68767 1090 GRASS SEED 10- 4568 - 643 -64 68767 1090 SEED /RAKE 10- 4568 - 643 -64 69868 1506 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE * * * * ** CHECK REGISTER 323T13 11/07/90 323T13 11/07/90 323T13 11/07/90 * * * * ** 540.00 323T29 11/07/90 323T30 11/08/90 * * * * ** 76.50 323T40 11/08/90 323T40 11/08/90 14,143.71 323T66 11/05/90 * * * * ** 323T74 11/08/90 * * * * ** BEER 323T88 11/07/90 323T88 11/08/90 * * * * ** FILE 323T96 11/08/90 * * * * ** 47.00 * 323U08 11/13/90 323U08 11/13/90 * * * * ** 78.21 * 323V15 11/13/90 323V15 11/13/90 323V15 11/13/90 11 -19 -90 PAGE 27 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 644 -64 10- 4201 - 980 -64 10- 4208 - 980 -64 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 220 -22 50- 4630 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS 40- 4504 - 801 -80 30703 1353' 40- 4504 - 803 -80 30702 1353 * ** -CKS 23- 4588 - 611 -61 405554 1377 * ** -CKS 10- 4558 - 643 -64 31195 9424 * ** -CKS 50- 4632 - 842 -84 50- 4632- 862 -86 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 13369 1480 * ** -CKS 10- 4266 - 420 -42 10- 4266 - 430 -42 - * ** -CKS 50- 4514 - 822 -82 332334 1454 50- 4514 - 842 -84 332338 1454 50- 4514- 862 -86 332340 1454 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 1,019.00 540.00 TOM HORWATH FORESTRY 345.00 TOM HORWATH TRIMMING 76.50 TOM HORWATH MILEAGE 961.50 * 14,143.71 THOMSEN - NYBECK PROSECUTING 14,143.71 * 11,941.50 THORPE DISTR. BEER 11,941.50 * 21.93 TOLL COMPANY FILE 25.07 TOLL COMPANY PROPANE 47.00 * 78.21 TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT CRAFT SUPPLIES 78.21 * 266.99 TURF SUPPLY CO. FERTILIZER 266.99 * 153.96 TWIN CITY HOME JUICE MIX 75.06 TWIN CITY HOME JUICE MIX 229.02 * 59.00 TWIN CITY GAR. DOOR REPAIR DOOR 59.00 * 4,164.86 UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 79.90 UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 4,244.76 * 1,285.30 VAN PAPER CO. PAPER BAGS 3,529.48 VAN PAPER CO. PAPER BAGS 1,310.03 VAN PAPER CO. PAPER BAGS 11 -19 -90 PAGE 27 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 644 -64 10- 4201 - 980 -64 10- 4208 - 980 -64 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 220 -22 50- 4630 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS 40- 4504 - 801 -80 30703 1353' 40- 4504 - 803 -80 30702 1353 * ** -CKS 23- 4588 - 611 -61 405554 1377 * ** -CKS 10- 4558 - 643 -64 31195 9424 * ** -CKS 50- 4632 - 842 -84 50- 4632- 862 -86 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 13369 1480 * ** -CKS 10- 4266 - 420 -42 10- 4266 - 430 -42 - * ** -CKS 50- 4514 - 822 -82 332334 1454 50- 4514 - 842 -84 332338 1454 50- 4514- 862 -86 332340 1454 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE *wwwww 323W08 11/05/90 323W08 11/05/90 323W08 11/08/90 323W08 11/09/90 wwwwww 323W15 11/05/90 www *ww 323W28 11/05/90 323W28 11/08/90 323W28 11/05/90 wwwwww 323W41 11/09/90 wwwwww 323W44 11/08/90 wwwwww 323W52 11/05/90 wwwwww 323W92 11/05/90 wwwwww AMOUNT 6,124.81 177.21 202.65 38.69 14.05 432.60 * 100.00 100.00 * 356.40 53.90 333.60 743.90 * 487.50 487.50 * 74.75 74.75 * 100.00 100.00 * 100.00 100.00 * 265,709.33 35.00 5,251.00 9,709.76 535.00 9,944.00 8,798.43 817.26 17,948.35 9,880.31 6,754.02 108,051.26 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION W.W. GRAINGER W.W. GRAINGER W.W. GRAINGER W.W. GRAINGER WALTER JOHNSON WATER PRODUCTS WATER PRODUCTS WATER PRODUCTS WEST PHOTO WEST WELD SUPPLY CO WILLIAM WALSH WROBLESKI -HENRY FUND 10 TOTAL FUND 11 TOTAL FUND 12 TOTAL FUND 23 TOTAL FUND 25 TOTAL FUND 27 TOTAL FUND 28 TOTAL FUND 29 TOTAL FUND 30 TOTAL FUND 40 TOTAL FUND 41 TOTAL FUND 50 TOTAL GENERAL SUPPLIES SPLIT GEAR TOOLS REPAIR PARTS POLICE SERVICES 11 -19 -90 PAGE 28 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 646 -64 9672 10- 4540 - 540 -54 9901 10- 4580 - 646 -64 1424 27- 4540- 664 -66 1679 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 803 -80 175426 1478 REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540- 803 -80 177089 1141 REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 168144 1163' PHOTOGRAPHIC GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE SERVICES POLICE SERVICES GENERAL FUND C.D.B.G. COMMUNICATIONS ART CENTER CAPITAL FUND GOLF COURSE FUND RECREATION CENTER FUND GUN RANGE FUND EDINBOROUGH PARK UTILITY FUND STORM SEWER UTILITY LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND * ** -CKS 10- 4508 - 420 -42 5858 1625 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 560 -56 86772 1354 10- 4100 - 430 -42 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -19 -90 PAGE 29 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 341,377.38 FUND 60 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 784,811.10 TOTAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -31 -90 PAGE 1 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 274721 10/29/90 437.00 CITY /INVER GRV HTS MUNICIPALS 10 =4206- 500 -50 MANUAL 437.00 ww *www * ** —CKS 274F14 10/29/90 15,082.81 FIDELITY BANK FICA 10- 41.49- 510 -51 MANUAL 274F14 10/29/90 972.70 FIDELITY BANK MEDCARE 10= 4162 - 510 -51 MANUAL e 16,055.51 wwwwww * ** —CKS 275A82 10/29/90 28.20 AT &T TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 510 -51 MANUAL 275A82 10/29/90 52.28 AT &T TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 622 -62 MANUAL - 275A82 10/29/90 2.85 AT &T TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 628 -62 MANUAL 83.33 wwwwww * ** —CKS 275A84 10/29/90 9.50 AT &T TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 510 -51 MANUAL 275A84 10/29/90 10.50 AT &T TELEPHONE 50- 4256 - 821 -82 MANUAL 20.00 * ' wwwww* * ** —CKS 275EII 10/29/90, 87.30 EAGLE WINE BEER 50- 4630 - 842 -84. MANUAL &7.30 * *w * ** * ** —CKS 275E26 10/29/90 107.20 ED PHILLIPS MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 MANUAL 275E26 10/29/90 47.00 ED PHILLIPS MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 MANUAL 154.20 *ww * ** * ** —CKS 275P20 10/29/90 78.00 -- PAUSTIS & SONS MIX 50- 4632- 842 -84 MANUAL 78.00 w *wwww * ** —CKS 275P32 10/29/90 25,737.72 P.E.R.A. PERA 10- 4145 - 510 -51 MANUAL, 25,737.72 *ww *ww * ** —CKS 275P82 10/29/90 19.95 PRIOR WINE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 275P82 10/29/90 61.21 PRIOR WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 822 -82 MANUAL 81.16 wwwwww * ** —CKS 275U27 10/29/90 1,373.27• US WEST TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL 27.5U27 10/29/90 180.89 US WEST TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 622 -62 MANUAL 275U27 10/29/90 103.46 US WEST TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 628 -62 MANUAL 275U27 10/29/90 31.40 US WEST TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 646 -64 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 275U27 10/29/90 50.68 US WEST TELEPHONE 30- 4256 - 782 -78 275U27 10/29/90 141.92 US WEST TELEPHONE 50- .4256- 821 -82 275U27 10/29/90 164.93 US WEST TELEPHONE 50- 4256 - 841 -84 2,046.55 A * * * * ** ` 277P70 10/29/90 2,365.02 POSTMASTER BULK /POSTAGE 12- 4215- 434 -43 2,365.02 * * * * * 278H83 10/29/90 110,000.00 HRA TRANSFER 10- 1145 - 000 -00 110,000.00 278N16 10/29/90 1,057.03 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 301 -30 . 278N16 10/29/90 20,959.46 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 321 -30 278N16 10/29/90 3,505.38 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 322 -30 278N16 10/29/90 3,491.44 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 330 -30 278N16 10/29/90 2,282.53 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 375 -30 278N16 10/29/90 700.75 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 440 -44 278N16 10/29/90 47.18 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 460 -46 278N16 10/29/90 2,177.48 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 520 -52 278N16 10/29/90 2,483.61 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 540 -54 278N16 10/29/90 6,351.60 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 646 -64 278N16 10/29/90 756.97 NSP POWER /LIGHT 23- 4252 - 612 -61 278N16 10/29/90 839.01 NSP POWER /LIGHT 26- 4252 - 682 -68 278N16 10/29/90 652.22 NSP POWER /LIGHT 27- 4252 - 662 -66 278N16 10/29/90 274.93 NSP POWER /LIGHT 27- 4252 - 664 -66 278N16 10/29/90 587.64 NSP POWER /LIGHT 27- 4252 - 667 -66 278N16 10/29/90 13,006.75 NSP POWER /LIGHT 28- 4252 - 702 -70 278N16 10/29/90 262.56 NSP POWER /LIGHT 29- 4252 - 722 -72 278N16 10/29/90 21.93 NSP POWER /LIGHT 30- 4252 - 436 -42 278N16 10/29/90 9,631.54 NSP POWER /LIGHT 30- 4252 - 782 -78 278N16 10/29/90 2,496.76 NSP POWER /LIGHT 40- 4252 - 801 -80 278N16 10/29/90 40,984.08 NSP POWER /LIGHT 40- 4252 - 803 -80 278N16 10/29/90 55.24 NSP POWER /LIGHT 41 -4252- 902 -90 278N16 10/29/90 14.17 NSP POWER /LIGHT 41- 4252 - 902 -90 278N16 10/29/90 862.49 NSP POWER /LIGHT 50- 4252 - 821 -82 278N16 10/29/90 1,419.33 NSP POWER /LIGHT 50- 4252 - 841 -84 278N16 10/29/90 685.94 NSP POWER /LIGHT 50- 4252 - 861 -86 115,608.02 * * * * * 282C51 10/29/90 76.71 COMM /REV SALES TAX 10- 3357 - 000 -00 282C51 10/29/90 206.64 COMM /REV SALES TAX 23- 3357 - 000 -00 282C51 10/29/90 79.45 COMM /REV -SALES TAX 26- 3357 - 000 -00 282C51 10/29/90 9,388.44 COMM /REV SALES TAX 27- 3357-000 -00 282C51 10/29/90 566.99 COMM /REV SALES TAX 28- 3357 - 000 -00 282C51 10/29/90 142.39 COMM /REV SALES TAX 29- 3357 - 000 -00 282C51 10/29/90 141.11 COMM /REV SALES TAX 30- 3357 - 000 -00 282C51 10/29/90 1,891.56 COMM /REV SALES TAX 40- 3357 - 000 -00 10 -31 -90 PAGE 2 # P.O. # MESSAGE MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -31 -90 PAGE 3 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 282C51 10/29/90 7,108.13 COMM /REV SALES TAX' 50- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 282C51 10/29/90 7,108.13- COMM /REV SALES TAX 50- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 282C51 10/29/90 7,108.13 COMM /REV SALES TAX 50- 3357 - 001 -00 MANUAL 282C51 10/29/90 12,240.36 COMM /REV SALES TAX 50- 3357- 002 -00 MANUAL 282C51 10/29/90 13,257.78 COMM /REV SALES TAX 50 -3357- 003 -00 MANUAL 45,099.56 kkkk * ** -CKS 282E11 11/05/90 3.07- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 282E11 11/05/90 1.63- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 282E11 11/05/90 3.08- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 282EII 11/05/90 6.34- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 282E11 11/05/90 2.74- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 282E11 11/05/90 5.39- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 282EII 11/05/90 306.73 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 282E11 11/05/90 162.85 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 282E11 11/05/90 634.34 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 282E11 11/05/90 307.59 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 282EII 11/05/90 539.08. EAGLE WINE 50 =4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 282E11 11/05/90 274.20 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 282E11 10/29/90 87.30 EAGLE WINE. BEER 50- 4630 - 862 -86 MANUAL 282EII 10/29/90 8.17 EAGLE WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 862 -86 MANUAL 2,298.01 k * *k ** * ** -CKS 282E26 11/05/90 17.79- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 282E26 .11/05/90 1.46- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 282E26 11/05/90 9.30- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 282E26 11/05/90 1.49- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 282E26 11/05/90 3.12- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 282E26 11/05/90 20.82- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 282E26 11/05/90 889.78 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 282E26 11/05/90 465.31 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 282E26 11/05/90 73.16 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 282E26 11/05/90 74.69 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 282E26 11/05/90 1,041.03 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 282E26 11/05/90 156.36 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 282E26 11/05/90 29.50 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 282E26 11/05/90 292.95 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 282E26 11/05/90 1,667.55 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 282E26 11/05/90 420.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 282E26 11/05/90 489.05 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 282E26 11/05/90 408.53 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 282E26 11/05/90 624.45 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 =84 MANUAL 282E26 11/05/90 561.95 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 282E26 11/05/90 1,042.55 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 282E26 11/05/90 631.01 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 282E26 11/05/90 541.95 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL, 282E26 10/29/90 66.90 ED PHILLIPS BEER 50- 4630 - 862 -86 MANUAL 9,422.74 kkk -CKS 282G82 11/05/90 17.46- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -31 -90 PAGE 4 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 282682 11/05/90 17.46- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL _...39 -13 --- - -- GRIGGS- 800PE.R.. - - -- - - -- ..•._ .. .. ..... ....._......... -..50- 3700 - 842 -84 _.. .....- .__........._. MANUAL 282G82 11/05/9.0 14.88- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 282682 11/05/90 22.08= GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 282G82 11/05/90 9.00- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82- MANUAL 282G82 11/05/90 41.90- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 82G82 11/05/90 5.27.- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 82G82 11/05/90. 2.84- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 282G82 11/05/90 79.00- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 282G82 11/05/90 1.42- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 282G82 11/05/90 2.96- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 282082 11/05/90 1.42- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 282082 11/05/90 9.61- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 282G82 11/05/90 89.11- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 282G82 11/05/90 13.73- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 282G82 11/05/90 449.86 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 282G82 11/05/90 2,094.76 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 282G82 11/05/90 3,950.07 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 282G82 11/05/90. 141.80 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 282G82 11/05/90 147.96 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 282G82 11/05/90 71.24 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 282G82 11/05/90 263:60 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 282G82 11/05/90. 4,455.62 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 282682 11/05/90 71.24 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 282682 11/05/90 480.37 GRIGGS. COOPER 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 282G82 11/05/90 686.50 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 282G82 11/05/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 282G82 11/05/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 46.28- 822 -82 MANUAL 282G82 11/05/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 282G82 11/05/90 503.79- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 282G82 11/05/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 282682 11/05/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 11,981.09 * * * * ** * * * -CKS 282J62 11/05/90 39.13- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL 282J62 11/05/90 5.86- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 282J62 11/05/90 5.86 JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 282J62- 11/05/90 4.05- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 282J62 11/05/90 35.77- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 282J62 11/05/90 5.86- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 282J62 11/05/90 79.62- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 282J62 11/05/90 16.34- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 282J62 11/05/90 8.74- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 282J62 11/05/90 81.52 - JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 282J62 11/05/90 7.87- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 282J62 11/05/90 7.85- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 282J62 11/05/90 9.44 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 282J62 11/05/90 1,788.93 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 282J62 11/05/90 28.32 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 282J62 11/05/90 8.50- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 282J62 11/05/90 - 3,982.14 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 282J62 11/05/90 4,075.31 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 962 -86 MANUAL 282J62 11/05/90 25.83 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 282J62 11/05/90 282J62 11/05/90 282J62 11/05/90 282J62 11/05/90 282J62 11/05/90 282J62 11/05/90 z82J62 11/05/90 282J62 11/05/90 282J62 11/05/90 282362 11/05/90 282J62 11/05/90 282J62 11/05/90 282J62 11/05/90 282J62 11/05/90 282J62 11/05/90 282J62 11/05/90 282J62 11/05/90 AMOUNT 404.45 585.63 59.2.71 7.08 11.80 592.71- 25.37 47.21 - 15.34 870.74 6.46- .00 1,633.54 24.19 783.94 786.66 10.03 14,719.82 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE * * * * ** 282P70 10/29/90 650.00 POSTMASTER 650.00.* * * * * ** 11/05/90 5.96- QUALITY WINE 282P82 11/05/90 1.60- PRIOR WINE 282P82 11/05/90 .44- PRIOR WINE. 28.2P82 11/05/90 2.32- PRIOR WINE 282P82 11/05/90 4.29- PRIOR WINE 282P82 11/05/90 4.78- PRIOR WINE 282P82 11/05/90 3.39- PRIOR WINE 282P82 11/05/90 .1.75- PRIOR WINE 282P82 11/05/90 2.97- PRIOR WINE 282P82 11/05/90 43.75 PRIOR WINE 282P82 11/05/90 232.41 PRIOR WINE 282P82 11/05/90 159.88 PRIOR WINE 282P82 11/05/90 477.69 PRIOR WINE 282P82 11/05/90 429.35 PRIOR WINE 282P82 11/05/90 296.92 PRIOR WINE 282P82 11/05/90 175.00 PRIOR WINE 282P82 11/05/90 338.50 PRIOR WINE 2,131.96 * * * * ** ITEM DESCRIPTION POSTAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50- 4628 - 822 -82 '50- 4628 - 822 -82 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 862 -86 50- 4628 - 862 -86 50- 4628 - 862 -86 50- 4628 - 862 -86 10- 4290 - 510 -51 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 842 -.84 50- 4628 - 862 -86 50- 4628- 862 -86 50- 4628 - 862 -86 282Q16 11/05/90 5.96- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 282Q16 11/05/90 12.24- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 282Q16 11/05/90 3.54- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 282Q16 11/05/90 14.48- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 282016 11/05/90 29.95- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 282Q16 11/05/90 1.17- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 282Q16 11/05/90 42.34- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 282Q16 11/05/90 .78- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 =86 282Q16 11/05/90 5'.16 - QUALI-TY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 10 -31 -90 PAGE 5 # P.O. # MESSAGE MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL 10 -31 -90 PAGE 6 ACCOUNT N0. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 3710-862 -86 1990 CITY OF EDINA MANUAL CHECK REGISTER MANUAL CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 282Q16 11/05/90 55.68- QUALITY WINE MANUAL 282Q16 11/05/90 7.54- QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 282Q16 11/05/90 611.92 QUALITY WINE MANUAL 282Q16 11/05/90 2,116.73 QUALITY WINE 282Q16 11/05/90 177.24 QUALITY WINE * ** -CKS 282Q16 11/05/90 258.16 QUALITY WINE 282Q16- 10/29/90 31.65 QUALITY WINE DEBIT ADJUST 282Q16 11/05/90 2,782.43 QUALITY WINE 282Q16 11/05/90 595.05 QUALITY WINE MANUAL 282Q16 11/05/90 1,445.65 QUALITY WINE 282Q16 11/05/90 2,992.30 QUALITY WINE MANUAL 282Q16 11/05/90 116.85 QUALITY WINE 282Q16 11/05/90 752.85 QUALITY WINE - 282Q16 11/05/90 77.90 QUALITY WINE 282Q16 10/29/90 .01 QUALITY WINE MIX 11,779.90 * * * * ** 282T22 11/05/90 80.10 THE WINE COMPANY * * * ** 80.10 * 283M98 11/07/90 3,706.31 MINNEGASCO GAS t 3,706.31 * * * * ** 284700 10/29/90 198._00 MN DEPT %NATL RES CERTIFICATION 198.00 * * * * ** 284C30 10/29/90 121.80 CITY BEER DIST BEER 284C30 10/29/90 34.60 CITY BEER DIST BEER, 156.40 284K57 10/29/90 2,496.40 KUETHER DIST BEER 284K57 10/29/90 4,477.45- KUETHER DIST BEER 6,973.85 * * * * ** 284M63 10/29/90 173.00 MN BAR SUPPLY MIX 173.00 * * * * ** 284N16 10/29/90 6,269.51 NSP POWER /LIGHT 284N16 10/29/90 7.06 NSP POWER /LIGHT 6,276.57 10 -31 -90 PAGE 6 ACCOUNT N0. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 3710-862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL - 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86' MANUAL 50- 4632 - 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL * ** -CKS 30- 425.2- 436 -42 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 3500 - 000 -00 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 4630 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4630- 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 4630 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4630 - 842 -84 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 4632 - 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 27- 4252 - 662 -66 MANUAL 41- 4252 - 902 -90 MANUAL * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 28030 10/29/90 284P30 10/29/90 �84R33 10/29/90 284R33 10/29/90 * * * * ** 50- 4632 - 822 -82 284T13 10/29/90 * * * * ** 285716 10/29/90 •285717 10/29/90 285717 10/29/90 285717 1.0/29/90 * * * * ** 285A82 10/29/90 285A82 10/29/90 285A82 10/29/90 285A82 10/29/90 " 285A83 10/29/90 285A84 10/29/90 * * * * ** MANUAL 285C33 10/29/90 285C33 10/29/90 * * * * ** 285M98 10/29/90 285M98 10/29/90 285M98 10/29/90 285M98 10/29/90 285M98 10/29/90 285M98 10/29/90 285M98 10/29/90 CHECK REGISTER 10 -31 -90 PAGE 7 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 161.11 PEPSI MIX 50- 4632 - 822 -82 MANUAL 261.74 PEPSI MIX 50- 4632 - 862 -86 MANUAL 422.85 * ** -CKS 5,233.00 REX DIST CO BEER 50- 4630 - 822 -82 MANUAL 4,876.70 REX DIST CO. BEER 50- 4630 - 862 -86 MANUAL 10,109.70 * ** -CKS 750.00 TOM HORWATH FORESTRY 10- 4201 - 644 -64 MANUAL 750.00 * ** -CKS 30.00 LMHRC REGISTRATION 10- 4280 - 504 -50 MANUAL 30.00 25.00 HOLIDAY EXPO 90 ANNUAL CONFERENCE 50- 4202 - 820 -82 MANUAL 100.00 HOLIDAY EXPO 90 ANNUAL CONFERENCE 50- 4202 - 840 -84 MANUAL 75.00 HOLIDAY EXPO 90 ANNUAL CONFERENCE 50- 4202 - 860 -86 MANUAL 200.00 * ** -CKS 2.59 AT &T TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL 2.47 AT &T TELEPHONE 23- 4256 - 612 -61 MANUAL 6.31 AT &T TELEPHONE 30- 4256 - 782 -78 MANUAL .40 AT &T TELEPHONE 50- 4256- 861 -86 MANUAL. 11.77 * 96.29 AT &T TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL 96.29 * 15.30 AT &T TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 510 -51 MANUAL 15.30 * * ** -CKS 128,000.00 - CITY /EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 128,000.00 CITY /EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL .00 * ** -CKS 77.71 US WEST TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 436 -42 MANUAL 2,564.61 US WEST TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 510 -51 MANUAL 247.55 US WEST TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 622 -62 MANUAL 64.90 US WEST TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 646 -64 MANUAL 167.15 US WEST TELEPHONE 23- 4256 - 612 -61 MANUAL 404.84 US WEST TELEPHONE 27- 4256 - 662 -66 MANUAL 90.69 US WEST TELEPHONE 27- 4256 = 664 -66 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -31-80 PAGE, 8 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 285M98 10/29/90 197.82• US WEST TELEPHONE 28- 4256 - 702 -70 MANUAL 285M98 10/29/90 47.23 US WEST TELEPHONE 29- 4256- 722 -72 MANUAL 285M98 10/25/90 85.32 US WEST TELEPHONE. .40- 4256 - 801 -80 MANUAL 285M98 10/29/90 576.28 US WEST TELEPHONE 40- 4256 - 803 -80 MANUAL 285M98 10/29/90 16.06 US WEST TELEPHONE 50- 4256_ 821 -82 MANUAL 285M98 10/29/90 '16.06 US WEST TELEPHONE 50- 4256 - 841 -84 MANUAL 285M98 10/29/90 174.54 US WEST TELEPHONE 50- 4256 - 861 -86 MANUAL 4,730.76 * ** -CKS 285P32 10/29/90 97.94 P.E.R.A. PERA 10- 4145 - 510 -51 MANUAL 97.94 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 289718 10/29/90 59.95 POLAROID SERV CTR EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274 - 420 -42 MANUAL 59.95 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 289EII 11/05/90 .46- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 289E11 11/05/90 6.23- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 289E11 11/05/90 2.28- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 289E11 11/05/90 3.18- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 289EII 11/05/90 3.52- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 289EII 11/05/90 1.33- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 289E11 11/05/90 622.91 EAGLE WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 289EII 11/05/90 45.99 EAGLE WINE `50-4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 289E11 11/05/90 228.00 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 289E11 11/05/90 317.94 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL - 289EII 11/05/90 133.10 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 289EII 11/05/90 352.32 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 1,683.26 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 289E26 11/05/90 7.21- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 289E26 11/05/90 2.39 - _ ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 289E26 11/05/90 12.35- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -.84 MANUAL 289E26 11/05/90 4.65- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 289E26 11/05/90 8.17- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 289E26 11/05/90 360.76 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 289E26 11/05/90 119.94 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 289E26 11/05/90 617.79 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 289E26 11/05/90 408.92 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 289E26 11/05/90 232.75 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 289E26 11/05/90 483.45 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 289E26 11/05/90 347..95 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 289E26 11/05/90 758.40 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 289E26 11/05/90 585.35 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 289E26 11/05/90 360.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 289E26 11/05/90 691.17 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 289E26 11/05/90 908.05 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 289E26 11/05/90 418.25 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV 289E26 11/05/90 478.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 6,736.01 289F14 10/29/90 14,490.94 FIDELITY BANK FICA 10- 4149 - 510 -51 289F14 10/29/90 752.11 FIDELITY BANK MEDICARE 10- 4162 - 510 -51 15,243.05 * * * * ** 289G82 11/05/90 15.15- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 822 -82 289G82 11/05/90 30.40- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 842 -84 289G82 11/05/90 44.40- GRIGGS COOPER 50 =3700- 862 -86 289G82 11/05/90 36.56- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 289G82 11/05/90 40.89- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 289G82 11/05/90 75.88- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 289G82 11/05/90 115.22- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 289G82 11/05/90 87.99- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 289G82 11/05/90 64.07- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 862 -86 289G82 11/05/90 1,828.12 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 822 -82 289G82 11/05/90 2,044.36 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 822 -82 289G82 11/05/90. 3,794.10 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 289G82 11/05/90 5,760.90 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 289G82 11/05/90 3,203.51 GRIGGS COOPER 50 -4626- 862 -86 289G82 11/05/90 4,399.34 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 862 -86 289G82 11/05/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 822 -82 289G82 11/05/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 842 -84 289G82 11/05/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 862 -86 20,519.77 * * * * ** 289J62 11/05/90 1.95- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 289J62 11/05/90 8.50- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 289J62 11/05/90 61.19- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 289J62 11/05/90 .25- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 289J62 11/05/90 6.52- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 289362 11/05/90 5.64- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 289J62 11/05/90 94.41- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 289J62 11/05/90 83.09- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 289J62 11/05/90 6.10- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 289J62 11/05/90 .75- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 289J62 11/05/90 6.06- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 289J62 11/05/90 3,058.27 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 289J62 11/05/90 19.18 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 289J62 11/05/90 4,720.63 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 289J62 11/05/90 33.64 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 289J62 11/05/90 4,155.14 _ JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 289J62 11/05/90 26.27 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 289J62 11/05/90 5.90 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 289J62 11/05/90 10.62 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 289J62 11/05/90 24.91 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 289J62 11/05/90 .59 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 289J62 11/05/90 850.86 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 10 -31 -90 PAGE 9 # P.O. # MESSAGE MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL,' MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * * * * ** * ** -CKS 289P32 10/29/90 26,091.23 P.E.R.A. PERA 10- 4145 - 510 -51 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA * * * * ** CHECK REGISTER 10 -31 -90 'PAGE 10 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 11/05/90 VENDOR ITEM-DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 289J62 11/05/90 194.64 2.34- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 289J62 11/05/90 10.62 50- 3710 - 842 -84 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 289362 11/05/90 17.70 289P82 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 289J62 11/05/90 560.96 445.27 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 289J62 11/05/90 651.31 50- 4628- 842 -84 JOHNSON WINE 50- .4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 289J62 11/05/90 74.73 289P82 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 89J62 11/05/90 17.11 310.11 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL .89J62 11/05/90 604.92 50- 4632- 822 -82 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 289J62 11/05/90 610.41 * * * * ** JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 289J62 11/05/90 1.77 .22- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 289J62 11/05/90 7.08 50- 3710 - 822 -82 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 15,382.80 -* 11/05/90 33.42- QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 * * * * ** 289Q16 11/05/90 4.82- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL * ** -CKS 289N16 10/29/90 62.67 50- 3710- 862 -86 NSP POWER /LIGHT 40 -4252- 801 -80 MANUAL QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 62.67.* 289Q16 11/05/90 3.63- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 289P32 10/29/90 26,091.23 P.E.R.A. PERA 10- 4145 - 510 -51 MANUAL 26,091.23 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 289P82 11/05/90 4.45- PRIOR'WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 289P82 11/05/90 2.34- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 289P82 11/05/90 1.11- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 289P82 11/05/90 .39- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 289P82 11/05/90 3.10- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 289P82 11/05/90 445.27 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 289P82 11/05/90 233.77 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 289P82 11/05/90 39.29 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 289P82 11/05/90 110.55 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 289P82' 11/05/90 310.11 PRIOR WINE- 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 289P82 10/29/90 18.76 PRIOR WINE MIX 50- 4632- 822 -82 MANUAL 1,146.36 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 289Q16 11/05/90 .22- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 289Q16 11/05/90 6.73- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 289Q16 11/05/90 25.38- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 289Q16 11/05/90 33.42- QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 289Q16 11/05/90 4.82- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 289Q16 11/05/90 7.97- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 289Q16 11/05/90 .66- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 289Q16 11/05/90 3.63- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 289Q16 11/05/90 49.40- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 289Q16 11/05/90 1,268.57 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 289Q16 11/05/90 1,671.36 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 289Q16 11/05/90 2,468.50 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 289Q16 11/05/90 670.90 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL, 289Q16 11/05/90 21.95 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 289Q16 11/05/90 481.55 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA 600,000.00 EAGLE CHECK REGISTER 10- 1145 - 000 -00 10 -31 -90 PAGE 11 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT * VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. . #-P.O. # MESSAGE 289Q16 11/05/90 3.59- .10 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 289Q16 11/05/90 795.30 EAGLE QUALITY WINE POSTAGE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 289Q16 11/05/90 362.50 * QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 289Q16 11/05/90 65.85 EAGLE QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 289Q16 10/29/90 3.64 .02 QUALITY WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296A82 10/29/90 7,674.37 EAGLE AT &T TELEPHONE 27- 4256- 662 -66 MANUAL 296A82 10/29/90 12.14 EAGLE.WINE AT &T TELEPHONE 27- 4256 - 664 -66 * ** -CKS 291873 10/29/90 16.28 EAGLE GC PETTY CASH TEMP SALARY 27- 4120 - 663 -66 MANUAL 291B73 10/29/90 20.84 .95 GC PETTY CASH SCHOOL 27- 4202 - 661 -66 MANUAL 291873 10/29/90 25.00 EAGLE GC PETTY CASH POSTAGE 27- 4290 - 661 -66 MANUAL 291873 10/29/90 14.00 EAGLE GC PETTY CASH MIKE CORD 27- 4504 - 661 -66 MANUAL 291B73 10/29/90 21.52 EAGLE GC PETTY CASH GENERAL SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 663 -66 MANUAL 291B73 10/29/90 139.96 EAGLE GC PETTY CASH COST /GOODS SOLD 27- 4624 - 663 -66 MANUAL 296EII 10/29/90 237.60 EAGLE WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 862 -86 MANUAL * * * * ** * ** -CKS 295H83 10/29/90 600,000.00 EAGLE HRA TRANSFER 10- 1145 - 000 -00 MANUAL 296E11 11/05/90 600,000.00 * WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL * * * * ** 11/05/90 3.59- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 * ** -CKS 295P70 10/29/90 195.00 EAGLE POSTMASTER POSTAGE 10- 4290 - 510 -51 MANUAL 296EII 11/05/90 195.00 * WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL * * * * ** 11/05/90 .23- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS 296A82 10%29/90 3.64 EAGLE AT &T TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL 296A82 10/29/90 57.85 EAGLE AT &T TELEPHONE 27- 4256- 662 -66 MANUAL 296A82 10/29/90 12.14 EAGLE.WINE AT &T TELEPHONE 27- 4256 - 664 -66 MANUAL 296A82 10/29/90 22.73 EAGLE AT &T TELEPHONE 28- 4256- 702 -70 MANUAL 296A82 10/29/90 658.32 .95 AT &T TELEPHONE 40- 4256 - 803 -80 MANUAL 296E11 11/05/90 97.31 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL * * * * ** * ** -CKS 296E11 11/05/90 .46- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 296E11 11/05/90 3.12- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 296EII 11/05/90 3.59- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296EII 11/05/90 .27- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296EII 11/05/90 6.58- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296EII 11/05/90 .23- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296E11 11/05/90 45.99 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 296EII 11/05/90 312.19 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 296EII 11/05/90 26.55 EAGLE.WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL - 296E11 11/05/90 358.94 EAGLE WINE 50 =4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 296E11 11/05/90 658.32 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296E11 11/05/90 22.95 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296E11 10/29/90 87.30 EAGLE WINE BEER 50- 4630- 822 -82 MANUAL 296EII 10/29/90 143.58 EAGLE WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 822 -82 MANUAL 296EII 10/29/90 264.70 EAGLE WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296EII 10/29/90 182.40 EAGLE WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 862 -86 MANUAL 2,088.67 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -31 -90 PAGE 12 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE ** -CKS 296E26. 11/05/90 1.25- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 296E26 11/05/90 25.84- ED PHILLIPS .50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296E26 11/05/90 9.31- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296E26 11/05/90 9.11- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296E26 11/05/90 4.69- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296E26 11/05/90 18.58 - ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296E26 11/05/90 62.53 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 296E26 11/05/90 465.69 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 842 -84' MANUAL' 296E26 11/05/90 1,292.06 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 296E26 11/05/90 455.53 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296E26 11/05/90 929.07 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 296E26 11/05/90 234.96 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296E26 11/05/90 665.95 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 296E26 11/05/90 361.90 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 296E26 11/05/90 400.43 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 296E26 11/05/90 1,478.40 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 296E26 11/05/90 58.94 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 296E26 11/05/90- 331.74 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 =84 - MANUAL 296E26 11/05/90 441.95 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296E26 11/05/90 91.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296E26 11/05/90 694.38 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296E26 11/05/90 437.95 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 296E26 11/05/90 885.05 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296E26 10/29/90 106.05 ED PHILLIPS BEER 50- 4630 = 842 -84 MANUAL 296E26 10/29/90 45.45 ED PHILLIPS BEER 50 -4630- 862 -86 MANUAL 296E26 10/29/90 32.20 ED PHIILIPS MIX 50- 4632- 822 -82 MANUAL 9,402.45 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 296G82 11/05/90 10.84- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL 296G82 11/05/90 15.34- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296G82 11/05/90 6.00- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296G82 11/05/90 28.51- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296G82 11/05/90 21.85- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 296G82 11/05/90 1.84- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296G82 11/05/90 118.01- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296G82 11/05/90 5.75- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296G82 11/05/90 40.27- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296G82 11/05/90 5.75- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296G82 11/05/90 1,092.50 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 296G82 11/05/90 287.64 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296G82 11/05/90 5,900.67 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296G82 11/05/90 91.87 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 296G82 11/05/90 287.64 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296G82 11/05/90 2,013.37 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296G82 11/05/90 ..00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 296G82 11/05/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296G82 11/05/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 842 -.84 MANUAL 296G82 11/05/90 13.77- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296G82 11/05/90 23.70- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296682 11/05/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -31 -90 PAGE 13 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 9,382.06 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 296J62 11/05/90 26.83- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 .85- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL z96J62 11/05/90 4.57- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 782 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 1.82- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 .17- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 1.61- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 2.14- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 153.94- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 2.54- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 .86- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 5.17- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 1.54- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 6.91- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 61.83- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 .91- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 1,342.01 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 7.97 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 7,697.77 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 49.27 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 20.51 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 3,092.96 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 457.18 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 84.70 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 5.31 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 180.77 JOHNSON WINE 50- 462.8- 822 -82 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 .59 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 4.72 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 1.18 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 17.30 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 254.10 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 211.84 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 2.36 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 5.90 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 3.54 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 2.95 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 7842 -84 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90. 161.19, JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84. MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 86.50 JOHNSON, WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 154.98 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 5.31 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 14.75 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 91.20 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 1.18 JOHNSON WINE. 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 8.26 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 689.82 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296J62 11/05/90 514.34 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 14,898.77 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 29020 11/05/90 3.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 296P20 11/05/90 108.90 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL I 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10- 31 -90- PAGE 14 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 296P20 11105/90 105.45 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296P20 11/05/90 3.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296P20 11/05/90 296.15 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296P20 11/05/90 6.40 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 296P20 10/,29/90 26.50 PAUSTIS & SONS MIX 50- 4632 - 822 -82 MANUAL 296P20 10/29/90 26.50 PAUSTIS & SONS MIX 50- 4632 - 862 -86 MANUAL 575.90 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 296P82 11/05/90 3.78- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 296P82 11/05/90 4.29- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296P82 11/05/90 6.15- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296P82 11/05/90 377.58 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 296P82 11/05/90 429.48 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296P82 11/05/90 615.33 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296P82 10/29/90 61:21 PRIOR WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 MANUAL 1,469.38 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 296Q16 11/05/90 7.90- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 296Q16 11/05/90 5.83 - QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 296Q16 11/05/90 10.63- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 296Q16 11/05/90 29.18- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296Q16 11/05/90 4.35- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296Q16 11/05/90 90.45- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296Q16 11/05/90 .78- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296Q16 11/05/90 9.03- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 296Q16 11/05/90 14.92- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296Q16 11/05/90 .65.82- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296Q16 11/05/90 291.82 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 296Q16 11/05/90 530.69 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 296Q16 11/05/90 1,459.10 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296Q16 11/05/90 4,521.96 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296Q16 11/05/90 3;290.84 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 296Q16 11/05/90 746.38 - QUALITY WINE 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 296Q16 11/05/90 788.25 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 296Q16 11/05/90 433.65 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 296Q16 11/05/90 901.60 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 296Q16 11/05/90 77.90 QUALITY -WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 12,803.30 * ** -CKS 296T49 11/05/90 93.27 TOW DISTRIBUTING 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 93.27 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 296U27 10/29/90 15.98 US' WEST TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 436 -42 MANUAL 296U27 10/29/90 343.96 US WEST 'TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL 296U27 10/29/90 115.09 US WEST TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 622 -62 MANUAL 296U27 10/29/90 21.53 US WEST TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 628 -62 MANUAL 296U27 10/29/90 29.20 US WEST TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 646 -64 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 296U27 10/29/90 296U27 10/29/90 296U27 10/29/90 296U27 10/29/90 190.40 US 297788 10/29/90 * * * * ** US 299C33 10/29/90 299C33 10/29/90 * * * * ** 302G86 11/07/90 65:52 US 302M24 11/07/90 * * * * ** ED PHILLIPS 302P42 11/07/90 * * * * ** ED PHILLIPS 303E11 11/05/90 303E11 11/05/90 303E'11 11/05/90 303E11 11/05/90 303E11 11/05/90 303EII 11/05/90 * * * * ** 303E26 11/05/90 303E26 11/05/90 303E26 11/05/90 303E26 11/05/90 303E26 11/05/90 303E26 11/05/90 303E26 11/05/90 303E26 11/05/90 303E26 11/05/90 303E26 11/05/90 303E26 11/05/90 110.00 •FORSYTHE RECOG EVENT MTG EXPENSE 110.00 140,000.00 CITY /EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 140,000.00- CITY /EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER .00 14,318.97 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 14,318.97 16,129.80 MEDCENTERS INSURANCE 16,129.80 * 21,498.50 PHP INSURANCE 21,498.50 * 3.44- EAGLE WINE CHECK REGISTER EAGLE WINE AMOUNT EAGLE WINE VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 190.40 US WEST TELEPHONE 98.82 US WEST TELEPHONE 931.83 US WEST TELEPHONE 65:52 US WEST TELEPHONE 1,812.33 ED PHILLIPS 1.49- ED PHILLIPS - 110.00 •FORSYTHE RECOG EVENT MTG EXPENSE 110.00 140,000.00 CITY /EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 140,000.00- CITY /EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER .00 14,318.97 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 14,318.97 16,129.80 MEDCENTERS INSURANCE 16,129.80 * 21,498.50 PHP INSURANCE 21,498.50 * 3.44- EAGLE WINE 1.11- EAGLE WINE 7.61- EAGLE WINE 344.49 EAGLE WINE . 111.15 EAGLE WINE 760.86 EAGLE WINE 1,204.34 * ** -CKS 1.32- ED- PHILLIPS 11.89- ED PHILLIPS 21.68- ED PHILLIPS 1.70- ED PHILLIPS 21.68- ED PHILLIPS 1.49- ED PHILLIPS 1.49- ED PHILLIPS - 8.13- ED PHILLIPS 19.22- ED PHILLIPS 594.93 ED PHILLIPS 1,084.00 ED PHILLIPS 10 -31 -90 PAGE 15 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 27- 4256- 667 -66 MANUAL 28- 4256 - 702 -70 MANUAL 30- 4256- 782 -78 MANUAL 30- 4256 - 784 -78 MANUAL * ** -CKS 12- 4206 - 434 -43 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4156 - 510 -51 r . MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4156- 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4156 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL _ 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84" MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -31 -90 PAGE 16 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 303E26 11/05/90 85.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 303E26 11/05/90 1,084.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 303E26 11/05/90 74.97 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 303E26 11/05/90 406.50 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 303E26 11/05/90 961.21 ED.PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 303E261 11/05/90 74.69 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 103E26 11/05/90 941.33 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 303E26 11/05/90 91.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 303E26 11/05/90 184.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 303E26 11/05/90 567.50 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 303E26 11/05/90 66.10 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 303E26 11/05/90 399.16 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 303E26 11/05/90 211.95 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 303E26, 11/05/90 290.90 ED .PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 303E26 11/05/90 1,314.61 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 303E26 11/05/90 425.95 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 303E26 11/05/90 737.70 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 303E26 11/07/90 37.50 ED PHILLIPS BEER 50- 4630 - 842 -84 MANUAL 303E26 11/07/90 37.50 ED PHILLIPS BEER 50- 4630 - 862 -86' MANUAL 9,581.90 * *'* -CKS 303G82 11/05/90 4.11- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL 303G82 11/05/90 22.84- GRIGGS COOPER 50 -3700- 862 =86 MANUAL 303G82 11/05/90 37.57- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 303G82 11/05/90 34.80- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 303G82 11/05/90 5.75- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 303G82 11/05/90 84.83- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 303G82 11/05/90 .5.75- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 303G82 11/05/90 1,878.47 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 303G82 11/05/90 287.64 GRIGGS COOPER -50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 303G82 11/05/90 1,740.09 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 303682 11/05/90 4,241.69 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 303G82 11/05/90 287.64 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 303G82 11/05/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 303G82 11/05/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 8,239.88 303H83 11/07/90 50,000.00 HRA TRANSFER 10- 1145 - 000 -00 MANUAL 50,000.00 * * * * ** *. ** -CKS 303J62 11/05/90 6.00- _ JOHNSON WINE 50- 3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL 303J62 11/05/90 17.75- JOHNSON WINE 5073700 - 842 -84 MANUAL 303J62 11/05/90 12.25- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 303J62 11/05/90 2.02- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 303J62 11/05/90 3.91- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 303J62 11/05/90 53.07- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 303J62 11/05/90 3.77- JOHNSON.WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 303J62 11/05/90 3.57- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 303J62 11/05/90 69.31- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 303J62 11/05/90 7.36- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 303J62 11/05/90 1.19- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86, MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -31 -90 PAGE 17, CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 303J62 11/05/90 84.71- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 303J62 11/05/90 .41- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 303J62 11/05/90 6.91- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 303J62 11/05/90 17.41 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 303J62 11/05/90 2,653.47 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 303J62 11/05/90 25.96 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 03J62 11/05/90 3,465.25 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL . 03J62 11/05/90 26.85 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 303J62 11/05/90 4,235.45 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 303J62 11/05/90 -2.95 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 303J62 11/05/90 11.80 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 303J62 11/05/90 .00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 303J62 11/05/90 376.93 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 303J62 11/05/90 6.49 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 303J62 11/05/90 388.72 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 303J62 11/05/90 202.00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 303J62 11/05/90 .00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 303J62 11/05/90 353.92 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 303J62 11/05/90 9.44 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 303J62 11/05/90 .59 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 303J62 11/05/90 21.24 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 303J62 11/05/90 118.99 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 303J62 11/05/90 41.20 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 303J62 11/05/90 736.43 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 303J62 11/05/90 .00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 303J62 11/05/90 689.02 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 303J62 11/05/90 8.85 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 13,120.73 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 303N12 11/07/90 2,284.95 MUTUAL BEN LIFE INSURANCE 10- 4158- 510 -51 MANUAL 2,284.95 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 303P20 11/05/90 72.90 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 303P20 11/07/90 43.95 PAUSTIS & SONS MIX 50- 4632 - 862 -86 MANUAL 116.85 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 303P82 11/05/90 3.68- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 303P82 11/05/90 2.02- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 303P82 11/05/90 .44- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 303P82 11/05/90 9.07- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 303P82 11/05/90 44.39 PRIOR WINE' 50- 4626 - 862 -86 - MANUAL 303P82 11/05/90 348.49 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 303P82 11/07/90 19.95 PRIOR WINE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 303P82 11/05/90 201.80 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 303P82 11/05/90 906.58 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 303P82 11/07/90 -17.65 PRIOR WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 MANUAL 1,523.65 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 10 -31 -90 PAGE 18 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. 9 MESSAGE 303Q16 11/05/90 37.31- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 303Q16 11/05/90 7.49- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 303Q16 11/05/90 ., 1.18- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 303Q16 11/05/90 35.52- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 303Q16 11/05/90 6.82- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 303Q16 11/05/90 2.747 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 303Q16 11/05/90 5.91- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 303Q16 11/05/90 1.86- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 303Q16 11/05/90 5.91- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 303Q16 11/05/90 5.91 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 303Q16 11/05/90 7.24- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 303Q16 11/05/90 74.82- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 303Q16 11/05/90 .78- QUALITY WINE- 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 303Q16 11/05/90 1,866.17 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 303Q16 11/05/90 746.75 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 303Q16 11/05/90 1,776.52 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 303Q16 11/05/90 136.76 - QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 303Q16 11/05/90 59.08 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 303Q16 11/05/90 29.00- QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 303Q16 11/05/90 93.36 QUALITY WINE_ 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL "303Q16 11/05/90 3,740.70 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 303Q16 11/05/90 29.00 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 303Q16 11/05/90 295.35 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 303Q16 11/05/90 681.35 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 303Q16 11/05/90 721.55 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 303Q16 11/05/90 77.90 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 10,013.82 * * * * ** * ** -CKS �. 11/07/90 14,343.32 FIDELITY BANK FICA 10- 4149- 510 -51 MANUAL - S2dr"� 11/07/90 728.30 FIDELITY BANK MEDICARE 10- 4162 - 510 -51 MANUAL 303f14 15,071.62 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 323H83 11/07/90 50,000.00- HRA TRANSFER 10- 1145 - 000 =00 MANUAL 323H83 11/07/90 50,000.00 HRA TRANSFER 10- 1145 - 000 -00 MANUAL .00 * * * ** * ** -CKS 963,362.61 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 2,475.02 FUND 12 TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS 1,133.23 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER 918.46 FUND 26 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUND 18,166.26 FUND 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND 13,893.11 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND 452.18 FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND 14,555.23 FUND 30 TOTAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 46,097.62 FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND 76.47 FUND 41 TOTAL STORM SEWER UTILITY 254,606.06 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 1,315,736.25* TOTAL