HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-11-19_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA.
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
NOVEMBER 19, 1990
ROLLCALL
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA MEETING OF NOVEMBER 6, 1990
II: AWARD OF BIDS - Centennial Lakes Park - Site Furnishings (Contd from 11/05/90)
(Continue to 12/16/90)
III. ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
PROCLAMATION - Epilepsy Month
I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *)
and in bold print are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one
motion. There will be no,_,separate discussion of such items unless a Council
Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the
consent agenda and considered in its ormal sequence on the agenda.
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing.
Zoning Ordinance: First and Second reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote
of all members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan approval of Property
Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass.
A. Second Reading - Amendment to Zoning Ordinance,No. 825, Section 7.D -
Customary Home Occupations - Conditional Use Permit for Certain Home
Occupations by Handicapped Residents
B. First Reading - Ordinance No. 171 -35 - Establishing Fee for Conditional
- Use Permit for Certain Home Occupations by Handicapped Residents
C. Preliminary Plat Approval - Farrells Parkwood Knolls - Tract A, R.L.S.
1286 located at 5700 Blake Rd (Contd from 11/05/90) 1
III. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
IV. AWARD OF BIDS
* A. Collection of Garbage/Refuse from City properties
* B. Skid Steer Loader with Attachments
* C. Fuel Monitoring'System
* D. Tractor - Braemar Golf Course
* E. 50th and France Seasonal Banners
V. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Approval of Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of November 13, 1990
B. Recommendation. - Community Health Services Advisory Committee
C. Proposal - Metro Relations, Inc.
D. Strong Beer - Edina Chamber of Commerce
E. Tax Forfeited Lands
* F. Set Hearing Date - Board of Review
* G. 1991 Council Meeting Dates
t
Agenda
Edina City Council
November 19, 1990
Page 2
VI. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
VII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
VIII. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
A. Fairview Southdale Detox Center
B. MLC Host Breakfast - 12/05/90
C. Wildlife Committee
IX. FINANCE
* A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated- 11/19/90: Total $784,811.10 and
confirmation of payment of Claims dated 10/31/90: Total $1,315,736.25
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Tues
Nov,
20
Truth in Taxation Budget Hearing
5:00
p.m.
Council
Room
Thurs
Nov
29
Reconvened Truth in Taxation Budget Hearing
5:00`p.m.
Council
Room
(If needed) -.
Nov 22 and
23
THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY - City Hall Closed
Mon
Nov
26
Futures Commission Presentation
5:00
p.m.
Arneson
Acres
Tues
Nov
27
LMC Policy Adoption Meeting
9:00
p.m.
Hotel Sofitel
Mon
Dec
3
Regular Council Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council
Room
Mon
Dec
17
Regular Council Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council
Room
MINUTES -
EDINA- HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AU'PHOBITY
NOVEMBER 5, 1990
Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Paulus-, Rice, Smith and Chairman
Richards.
MINUTES of the HRA Meeting of October 15, 1990, were approved as submitted by
motion of Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Kelly.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
AWARD OF BID FOR CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK — SITE FURNISHINGS CONTINUED TO 11/19/90
Commissioner moved to continue award of bid for Centennial Lakes Park -
Site Furnishings to November 19, 1990. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Rice.
Ayes > - Kelly, Paulus, Rice,.Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR CENTENNIAL LAKES PHASE IV - HOUSING PUBLIC S
Commissioner Smith moved to award the following bids for Centennial Lakes Phase
IV, Stage I of the Residential Amenities for buildings 4, 5 and 6:
Walkway R.W. Compton, Inc. (low bidder) $11,880.00
Fountain Olympic Pools, Inc. (sole bidder) 8,675.00
Utilities Brown.& Cris, Inc. 42,889.00
Landscaping Minnesota Valley Landscape, Inc. 52,489.50
Electrical Master Electric, Inc. 16,579.00
Motion was seconded by Commissioner Rice.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
REPORT GIVEN ON EAST EDINA HOUSING FOUNDATION ACTION REGARDING SECOND MORTGAGES ON
CENTENNIAL LAKES CONDOMINIUMS Executive Director Gordon Hughes referred to a
letter dated October 31, 1990 from Thomas S. Erickson, counsel, to the HRA
Commissioners regarding the Centennial Lakes Condominiums. Specifically, the
letter noted that certain requirements are imposed by the Redevelopment Contract
on how much of a second mortgage can'be given to any buyer. One of those
requirements states that no second mortgage shall be given for any unit which has
a gross sales price of over $90,000. This restriction was requested by the
Developer for the purpose of giving concrete and objective guidelines as to the
use of second mortgage funds.
At a meeting with the Foundation Board of Directors on October 29, 1990, the
Developer requested relief from the $90,000 cap on sale prices for two reasons:
1) Centennial Lakes Condominiums have fourteen different floor plans to choose
from and the cap would restrict the ability of a buyer to choose among the plans.
2) The cost of construction of the units has gone up and relief from the cap would
take into account price increases.
The Foundation Board agreed to the removal of the $90,000 restriction because
(i) it was not imposed nor found to be needed at Edinborough and was imposed at
Centennial Lakes at the request of the developer who now requests relief
therefrom, (ii) the requirement still exists that second mortgage funds go only to
Moderate Income Purchasers, (iii) the requirement still exists that,80% of all
units in each condominium development be sold to Moderate Income Purchasers,
(iv) therefore, the main result from removing the $90,000 cap would be to allow
Moderate Income Purchasers to have a greater range of.floor plans from which to
choose and to allow some sales to be made which otherwise would not be made.
The Board also decided to impose a new restriction which would prohibit the giving
of any second mortgages to any buyer or buyers whose adjusted gross income exceeds
90% of the Median Family Income. The.Board imposed that limitation to insure that
the second mortgage funds would be made available only to those who could use it
most. The Developer agreed to this new limitation.
Director Hughes concluded that there is no action the HRA needs to take relative
to the Board's action and that the report was to advise the Commissioners of the
removal of the cap. <
There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, motion of Commissioner Smith
for adjournment.uas seconded by Commissioner Rice.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
Executive Director
tit
0
P R O C L A M A T I O N
WHEREAS: .there ai'Le mote than 100,000 Minnesotans with some 6otm o6
ep c teps y; and
WHEREAS, epce.epsy i.6 the second most common neutotog.ic.ae. di. 6unction
of phys.icaP , .cmpa'AMent, not a d.i s ears e but a diz otdet o6 the
nervous system; and
WHEREAS, sixty peAcent o6 those peuon,d ,who have epiiepay ate
eteinentaty 6choot chitdten of youngQtc which iz apptoximateiy
one chie.d in eveAy second cea5stoom; and
WHEREAS, eatty diagnosis and attention to the soc<.a2 and neutotog.icat
aspects 66 epilepsy wiU a66otd people betttet conttot; and
WHEREAS, there continues to be a need Got .i.mptoved education and mote
.in�otmati"on tegaAding pubti"c attitudes toward undetustanding
and accepting ,those pPtusons with epite0y.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that I, Ftedet.ick.S. Richatds, Mayot o6
the City o6 Edina, do hereby ptoceaim the month o6 Novembet ass
EPILEPSY- MONTH
IN THE CITY OF EDINA
and encounag e the tes.idents o6 out City to .inctcea,s e theit awateness o6 the
needs o6 .those who have epiieps y.
Ftedet.ick S. R.ichotds, Mayor
A.
o
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To. KENNETH ROSLAND
From. CRAIG LARSEN
Date. NOVEMBER 19, 1990
Subject: SECOND READING ORDINANC
NO. 825 A TEMPORARY
CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
FOR HOME OCCUPATIONS
BY HANDICAPPED
RFSTTIFNTR
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # TT • A.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
(�
To Council
Action ❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
0
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Approve second reading of attached Zoning Ordinance Amendment.
Info /Background
Attached is the revised ordinance amendment for Conditional Use
Permits for handicapped residents. Changes from first reading are
underlined.
The ordinance has been revised to provide for City Council review
after one year and thereafter every second year. The ordinance
provides for a review and not renewal. The Council would review to
determine if conditions of the permit are being observed. If they
are not, the Council could order a (evocation of the permit. We
have eliminated the word renew because it conflicts with language
in the State Statute.
Presently the amendment provides for permits by residents who are
"physically unable to be fully employed" outside the residence. We
would suggest this phrase be changed to read "unable to be employed
full time outside one's residence." This phrase is more definite
and more easily understood."
Tom Erickson's comments on the proposed changes is attached.
DOBSEY & ,WHITNEY
A Pea E"HIP INCLUDING PNGISSSIONAL COR-ONS
350 PARE AVENUE
2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST
340 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022
(212)415 -9200
'.MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 33903
MIN ESO
(5R,
1330 CONNECTICUT AVENUE, N. W.
612) 340 -2600
315 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20036
.2003
(202) 857 -0700
TELEX 29 -0603
WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391
-,
FAX (612)340 -2868
(612)475 -0373
3 GRACECHURCH STREET
LONDON 9 OAT, ENGLAND
1200 FIRST INTERSTATE CENTER
01-92 9-3334
BILLINGS, MONTANA 59103
(406)252 -3800
36, RUE TRONCRET
THOMAS S. ERICKSON
750 PARIS, FRANCS
(612) 340-
201 DAVIDSON BUILDING
O1- I -42- 66-59-49
GREAT PALLS, MONTANA 59401
(406)727 -3632
FAR EAST FINANCE CENTER
127 EAST FRONT STREET
HONG HONG
MISSOULA, MONTANA 59802
852 -5- 6612555
(406)721 -6025
November 8, 1990
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Attention: Mr. Craig Larsen, City Planner
Re: Ordinance No. 825 -A
Conditional Use Permits for Home Occupations by
Handicapped Residents
Dear Craig:
Enclosed is the revision of the above- referenced Ordinance. The
revisions are based upon the discussion at the Council meeting of November 5,
1990, and our subsequent discussions. My revisions are blacklined for your
reviewing convenience. , review the Ordinance and give me your comments.
In connection with you review please note the following:
1. The ordinance number will have to be inserted. I understand you
will get that number from the City Clerk.
2. The sentence added at the end of the "Purpose" paragraph was
requested by Mr. Smith to- make it clear that handicapped persons did not have to go
through the conditional use permit process if they otherwise complied with the
customary home occupation conditions.
3. Paragraph 4(c), relating to conditions, and paragraph 5, relating to
review of permits, have been entirely rewritten. You will note that paragraph 5
does not now provide for expiration and renewal of the permit, but instead provides
that the Council shall review each permit periodically to see if the conditions under
which that permit was given are still bring complied with. If they are not being
DORSEY & WHITNEY
Mr. Craig Larsen
November 8; 1990
Page 2 °
complied with, then the Council may direct City Manager to proceed with
revocation of the permit pursuant to ,the provisions of ,paragraph Hof Section 4 of
the Ordinance. Paragraph H provides that notice is given to the violators and they
have a time stated in the notice, to cure any violation. If it is not cured, the matter is
submitted to the City Council for hearing and the Council may, at such hearing or
continuation thereof, revoke the permit. I have set this paragraph up in this
manner because the statute relating to conditional use permits (Minn. Stat.,
§ 462.3595) recites that the duration of'a permit shall be "as long as the conditions
agreed upon are observed, ...." The provisions of paragraph 5, as I have revised it,
therefore, complies with the statute in tying the duration to specific conditions but
also gives the Council a specific opportunity (in addition to the hearing in
connection. with a violation) to review the conditions and to, act if there is a
violation. I trust this procedure will be found acceptable by the Council.
There is one other matter that I do wish to discuss. We had previously
conferred on what the meaning is of the phrase "fully employed" as recommended
by the Planning Commission. That phrase is troubling because it lacks clarity and
definitiveness. You initially had in the ordinance the phrase "unable to be
employed fulltime outside one's residence." That phrase, in my opinion, has a
more definitive meaning, and we could even define it further in the ordinance to
mean, for example, at least 35 hours of work per week outside of the home. I
.recommend that ,such a change be made in the ordinance.
Once you have reviewed the Ordinance, if you have any questions or
comments,. or changes to be made, please let me know.
Very truly yours,
Thomas S. Erickson
TSE:kks
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland; City Manager
'-VCtcltltned 1014o
ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE
ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825) TO
PROVIDE FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
TO ALLOW CERTAIN HOME OCCUPATIONS
BY HANDICAPPED RESIDENTS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Paragraph D (Customary Home Occupations as an Accessory Use)
of Section 7 (General Requirements Applicable to All Districts Except As Otherwise
Stated) of Ordinance No. 825 is hereby amended by adding a new subparagraph as
follows:
"4. Permitted customary home occupations by residents who are
physically unable to be fully employed outside their residence may be allowed as a
temporary conditional use,, with variances from the conditions of subparagraph 1 of
this paragraph D, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph I of Section 4
(Administration and Procedures) of this ordinance."
Seca 2. Section 4 (Administration and Procedures) is hereby amended by
adding a new paragraph I as follows:
"I. Temporary Conditional Use Permits.
1. PurRose. The purpose of temporary conditional use permits
is to allow handicapped residents of dwelling units to conduct and operate
permitted customary home occupations in their residence.by means of such
variances from the conditions otherwise imposed by this ordinance on such
occupation as the Council deems necessary and appropriate to allow such
persons to, properly conduct and operate such occupation from their
residence. The Council hereby finds and determines that it is in the best
interests of the City and its citizens to provide a process and means by which
handicapped persons can carry on home occupations from their residence and
thereby become or remain productive and gainfully employe and that the
granting of conditional use permits pursuant to this paragrap I will promote
the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City, and its
citizens. However, handicapped residents who do not need variances from
conditions imposed by this ordinance on customary home occupations need
not, and are not required to, obtain a conditional use permit pursuant to this
paragraph I.
2. Conditional Use Provisions Apply. All the provisions of
paragraphs D and H of this Section 4 relative to the issuance of conditional
permits shall apply to temporary conditional use permits issued pursuant to
this paragraph I, except as specifically changed by this paragraph I.
3. AQplications and Notice.
(a) 'An application for a temporary conditional use permit may
be initiated by the occupant of the residence from which the home
occupation is to be conducted, whether such occupant is an owner or a
lessee of the residence.
(b) The application for a temporary conditional use permit shall
be accompanied by the following additional information:
(i) a letter (which shall be dated riot earlier than 30 days
prior to the date of the application) from the applicant's
attending physician (who shall-be duly licensed to practice
medicine in Minnesota) certifying that the applicant is physically
unable to be fully employed outside of the applicant's residence;
(ii) the specific home occupation proposed by the
applicant, including the expected number of weekly automobile
trips to the dwelling unit by individuals other than the residents
thereof expected to be generated by the home occupation, the
number of hours per day and the number of days per week the
home occupation will operate;
(iii) any proposed interior or exterior alterations to the
dwelling unit necessary due to the proposed home occupation;
and
(iv) any other information required, in the' opinion of the
Planner, to evaluate the application, to determine consistency
with the Comprehensive Plan, and to insure compliance with
the requirements contained in this ordinance and other
applicable City ordinances.
(c) The erection of a sign shall not be required in connection
with the application for a temporary conditional use permit.
(d) Notice of hearing before the Council shall be published and
mailed as provided in subparagraph 5 of paragraph D of this Section 4
except that mailed notice shall be given only to owners of property
situated wholly or partly within 350 feet of the property to which the.
application relates.
2
4. Conditions and Findings.
(a) In order to grant a temporary conditional use permit, the
Council must make the same findings as set forth in subparagraph 5 of
paragraph D of this Section 4.
(b) In order to grant a temporary conditional use. permit, the
Council must also find that the proposed home occupation complies
with the conditions of subparagraph 1 of paragraph D of Section 7 of
this ordinance, provided, however, that:
(i) the Council may grant a variance of any condition in
subparagraph 1. of paragraph D of said Section 7, if deemed
necessary by the Council to permit the applicants to properly
operate and conduct the proposed home occupation and if the
Council finds that such use will not negate or violate any of the
findings to be made pursuant to subparagraph 5 of paragraph D
of this Section 4;
(ii) the maximum number of automobile trips to the
dwelling unit of the applicant by individuals other than the
residents thereof generated as a result of such home occupation
may be increased by the Council from ten per week to a
maximum of twenty per week in connection with the granting
of such permit.
(c) Any permit granted pursuant to this paragraph IAshall
remain in effect, if not earlier terminated under other provisions of
this ordinance, only so long as the following conditions are observed
and complied with:
0) that the applicants occupy the dwelling unit described
in the permit, and then only so long as such applicants are
\ physically unable to be fully employed outside of the applicant's
residence;
(ii) that the findings made by the Council as set forth in
subparagraph 5 of paragraph D of this Section 4 continue
without change or violation; and
(iii) that the conditions of subparagraph 1 of paragraph D
of Section 7 of this ordinance, as varied by variances granted by
the Council, are not violated.
3
5. Duration and Review of Permits.
(a) Each permit issued pursuant to this paragraph I shall remain
in effect only so long as the conditions set out in subparagraph 4(c) of
this paragraph I are observed and not violated.
(b) The Council shall review each permit issued pursuant to this
paragraph I on the first anniversary of the effective date of the permit
and on each second anniversary (i.e., every other year) of such effective
date thereafter to determine if any of such conditions are not being
observed or are being violated. Such review shall be made at a public
hearing, notice of which shall be published and mailed in the same
manner as notice would then be given under this ordinance for a then
new conditional use permit. All persons may be heard, and the
Council shall receive such evidence and information as it deems
necessary or desirable, orally and in writing, at such hearing and
continuations thereof. If, at such hearing, or a continuation thereof,
the Council concludes, by resolution, that one or more of the
conditions set out in subparagraph 4(c) of this paragraph I are not being
observed or are being violated, then the Council may direct the
Manager to institute proceedings to revoke the permit as provided in
paragraph H of this Section 4. The foregoing provisions shall not
prevent the City from exercising any remedies for violations of any
conditions applicable to any conditional use permit whenever they
occur.
6. All Districts. Customary home occupations conducted pursuant to
temporary conditional use permits issued under this paragraph I shall be
allowed as a conditional use in all districts in which dwelling units are
allowed."
4
Sec. 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage
and publication.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Published in the Edina
Sun - Current on
Attest:
Clerk
5
Mayor
r �!
c�
o ef.., 71 n
�y REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
\\ q do
To:
KENNETH ROSLAND
Agenda Item # II . B
From:
CRAIG LARSEN
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Date:
NOVEMBER 19, 1990
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
ORDINANCE NO. 171-A
To Council
FEE FOR TEMPORARY
USE PERMITS.
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Adopt Ordinance and waive second reading.
Info /Background
The attached ordinance provides for a $75.00 application fee for Temporary
Conditional Use Permits for handicapped residents.
i
c
ORDINANCE NO. 171 -A
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 171
TO ADD FEE FOR TEMPORARY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Schedule A to Ordinance No. 171 is hereby amended
by adding the following thereto:
ORD. SEC.'
NO. NO. PURPOSE OF FEE /CHARGE AMOUNT FEE PD.
825 4(E)l Temporary Conditional $75.00 29f -a
Use Permit
Section 2. This ordinance shall be.in full force and effect
immediately upon its passage and publication.
ATTEST:
/s/ MARCELLA M. DAEHN
City Clerk
/s/ Frederick S. Richards
Mayor
e
A.
o e
ch
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To: KENNETH ROSLAND
From: CRAIG LARSEN
Date: NOVEMBER 19, 1990
Subject: 5 -90 -6, PRELIMINARY
PLAT APPROVAL, FARRELL
ADDITION. 5700 BLAKE
ROAD.
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # u_--c .
Consent
F7
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
0
To Council
Action
0
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
The Planning Commission recommends denial of the three lot
preliminary plat.
The Planning Commission considered the proposed subdivision at two
meetings and has considered three different approaches to the
preliminary plat.
August 29, 1990, Planning Commission Meeting. The preliminary plat
was originally proposed as a three lot plat with new lot lines
generally running in a east -west direction. The staff report was
written on the three lot proposal. However, at the Planning
Commission meeting the Farewells presented a revised two lot plat
which eliminated the northerly lot. The Planning Commission voted
unanimously to approve the revised two lot preliminary plat.
September 26, 1990, Planning Commission Meeting. The Farrells
chose not to proceed to City Council with the approved two lot
plat. Instead they decided to return to the Commission with a
revised three lot subdivision. The revised three lot plat left the
proposed new lot -south of the existing home essentially the same as
the earlier proposal. The northerly portion of the proposed plat
M
was now divided east west as opposed to north south as in the
earlier three lot preliminary plat. This change would allow for a
larger front setback from South Knoll Drive on Lot 2. The three
existing homes that front on this block of South Knoll have an
average setback of 127 feet. The Planning Commission voted by a 5
to 4 margin to recommend denial of the revised three lot plat. The
lot width variances required for-lots one and three and the
possibility of a need for a, front setback variance on Lot 2 were
given as reasons.
The Farrells have decided to proceed to the Council and ask for
approval of the revised three lot plat. Full size copies are
attached.
Size/Area Comparison
500 Foot Neighborhood (45 lots)
Lot,Width Lot Depth Lot Area
Lot 1 126* 240, 32,300
Lot 2 130 205 26,700
Lot 3 108* 273 36,700
*Lots one and three require a lot width variance. All of the lots
comply with or exceed all other size requirements.
Included in this packet is a copy of all correspondence received
including correspondence received from James Van Valkenburg who is
representing. the Farrells.
ml
no
._l-„I:
0
ol0q,lm d to] ; m►',I. \-
. , . - M_U ► . ..
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
SEPTEMBER 26, 1990
S -90 -6 Preliminary Plat Approval,
Farrells Parkwood Knolls,
5700 Blake Road
The Commission will recall that it recommended approval of a two
lot subdivision of the, subject property at its last meeting.
Originally proposed as a three lot plat, it was modified to two at,
the 'meeting. The proponent's have elected to return to the
Commission and propose a revised three lot plat.
Dimensions of,Lots in the revised preliminary plat are:
Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3
Lot Width 126 s.f. 130 s.f. 110 s.f.
Lot Depth 240 s.f. 205 s.f. 273 s.f.
.Lot Area 32,500 s.f. 26,500 s.f.' 36,700 s.f.
Lots 1 and 3 require a lot width variance from the median average
for the 500 foot neighborhood. All three lots exceed all other
standards including lot width to perimeter ratio. The revised plat
.,also provides an increased lot width for all three lots.
Recommendation:
Staff concern is not with the size of the proposed lots. Our
concern is the manner in which Lot ,2 would be developed. The
revised plat insures that the house will be developed with maximum
separation from the existing home on South Knoll Drive.
Development of this lot will require a front and probably a side
street variance.. The need for a variance may insure the best
protection for the next door neighbor and the City.
DRAFT MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 26, 1990
S -90 -6 Preliminary Plat Approval,
Farrells Parkwood Knolls,
5700 Blake Road
Mr. Larsen asked the Commission to recall they recommended approval
of a two lot subdivision of the subject property at its last
meeting. Originally proposed as a three lot plat, it was modified
to two at the meeting. Mr. Larsen added the proponent's have
elected to return to the Commission and propose a revised three lot
plat.
Mr. Larsen concluded that staff concern is not with the size of the
proposed lots, but the manner in which Lot 2 would be developed.
He explained the revised plat insures that the house will be
developed with maximum separation from the existing home on South
Knoll Drive. Mr. Larsen indicated development of this lot will
require a front and probably a side street variance. Mr. Larsen
pointed out the need for variances may be a positive since it
.allows the City more control over the development of the lot.
The proponents, Mr. and Mrs. Farrell were present. Mr. Wurst, 6205
South Knoll Drive an interested neighbor was present.
Commissioner L. Johnson questioned Mr. Larsen on the probability of
a side street setback variance being needed for Lot 2. Mr. Larsen
explained a corner lot in certain instances has to maintain two
front yard setbacks. This property must maintain setbacks from
Blake Road as well as South Knoll Drive.
Mr. Farrell told the Commission during the last meeting his
proposal was heard after a very long, emotional hearing regarding
home occupations. He explained he was very tired and his revised
proposal from three lots to two lots was made very late which
caused confusion for the Planning Commission and for him. He
reminded the Commission the reason for a change to the original
plat was to accommodate concerns expressed by his neighbor, Mr.
Wurst. Continuing, he said he indicated at the past meeting that
he supported placement of a conservation easement on one of the two
lots. Mr. Farrell told the Commission at that time, and at
present, he is unclear on where or what the conservation easement
would be. Mr. Farrell noted all he wants is to build a new house
for his family on proposed Lot.3. Mr. Farrell stated he believes
the proposal as presented would increase the value of the neighbors
homes and be a plus for the entire area. If he sold his property
this issue would, in reality, come, up again, and the proposed three
lot subdivision affords a measure of control over development. Mr.
Farrell concluded that the building pads located on the proposed
plat are indicated as required -by the-new ordinance. They are not
set in concrete, there is room for redesign and a change to what
has been illustrated.
Mr. Wurst indicated he was confused. He said he thought this
matter was settled with a two lot subdivision. He told the
Commission if a three lot subdivision is approved the new house
would harm his. property due to the decreased setback from South
Knoll. He pointed out the proposed building pad depicts a front
yard setback that is less than the three homes located on the
block. He added if a house were allowed to be developed, when he
walks out his front door he would see the rear, or at the very
least, the side of the proposed new house. He added he feels it is
not aesthetically pleasing, and not appropriate for a home to be
constructed in front of other homes. Mr. Wurst added another
concern of his is that he did not receive re- notice of the change
to the Farrells plat.
Mr. Farrell pointed out that a three lot subdivision would create
three new lots that are respectively numbers 4, 5, and 9 in size
within the entire 500 foot neighborhood radious. He added the
variance process would afford protection by locating the proposed
home on Lot 2 in the proper, place. Regarding notifying the
neighbors, Mr. Farrell said renotification was not needed because
what is presented this evening is a three lot subdivision very
similar to what was originally proposed, and notified for.
Mr. Wurst pointed out the elevations of the Farrell - property should
be taken into consideration when the property is being studied for
subdivision. He said the drop in elevations is substantial and the
height of the proposed new house would be a concern. Mr. Wurst
questioned the hardship in supporting a three lot subdivision
versus the approved two lot subdivision that would not require any
variances.
Commissioner L. Johnson told the Commission he felt this was a
"done 'deal". He pointed out the proposal this evening is different
from what was approved and maybe re- notification should have
occurred. Commissioner L. Johnson continued that he felt the
conservation easement or scenic easement ran along the north
portion of the new lot on the South Knoll side of the property.
Commissioner; Palmer said when he first reviewed the plans submitted
and visited the site he observed what he felt were problems with a
three lot subdivision. He added when he learned the proponents
withdrew their request for a three lot subdivision and submitted a
revised plan at the Commission meeting illustrating two lots
instead of the proposed three he was delighted. He said he has a
problem supporting the three lot proposal when he finds no hardship
And a variance is required.
Commissioner McClelland reminded the Commission at the last meeting
it was suggested that the proponent's consider dividing the
proposal north and south. She added the proponents should not be
penalized for not understanding what happened at the last meeting.
This issue was heard after a emotional lengthy hearing and the
confusion that occurred resulting from their change in plans is
something that should be recognized.
Mr. Larsen responded to the question and confusion regarding
notices. He reminded the Commission the Planning Commission is a
public meeting,, not a public hearing. A public hearing requires
notification, a public meeting does not. He explained a condition
of the newly adopted subdivision ordinance states that properties
within 500 feet of the property in question are to be notified that
a process for subdivision has commenced 10 days before the request
is heard by the Planning Commission. This .requirement has been
fulfilled at the Commission level as the Farrells are technically
in the subdivision process. Mr. Larsen in responding to the
questions regarding hardship added if a lot is approved with the
knowledge of a variance being needed, a hardship is recognized.
Commissioner McClelland pointed out the proponent is only two feet
short of what is stipulated by ordinance and the variance request
on the lot in question would be minimal. She stressed that the
proponents expressed they had no clear understanding of what
occurred at the Commission meeting and no understanding of what
they agreed to. She commented she felt some consideration should
be given to the proponents and added she finds it surprising some
members are having difficulty in approving a three lot subdivision
that may need a slight variance. Commissioner Runyan suggested
that the issue of a two lot subdivision versus three lot
subdivision may exist with the alignment of the proposed three
lots, the topography, placement of the existing house, curb cuts,
and conservation concerns, not just if or if not variances are
needed.
Commissioner Faust said she feels the lot in question is large
enough to accommodate three lots. She pointed out Edina is an
urban city and Mr. Wursts concern regarding viewing a house out of
his front yard is something that occurs within a City environment.
Commissioner Faust pointed out the newly proposed lots, are well
within the median range of lot size, and in fact are larger than
most lots within the area.
Commissioner Byron said the issue of notices not being mailed in a
sense is a mute point. He reminded the Commission at the last
meeting action was taken on a proposal that was different than what
was presented and no new notices were mailed. He said in his
opinion he believes the notice requirement at the Commission level
has been satisfied. Commissioner Byron noted at this meeting,
whatever is decided, the outcome should be clear to the proponent
and the Commission. Continuing he added he believes if a three lot
subdivision is approved the issue of house placement can be dealt
with adequately through the variance procedure.
Chairman Johnson said acting as "devil's advocate" inquired if a
lot is allowed to be created, is the ' Commission signaling it is
buildable? Commissioner McClelland said she believes a variance
may not be needed on Lot 2. The building pad depicted on the plat.
for Lot 2 could be moved back farther, therefore not requiring a
variance.
Mr. Farrell reminded the Commission the subdivision process
requires that a building pad be illustrated on preliminary plats.
Mr. Farrell said he believes the building pad for Lot 2 has been
located in the best place. Mr. Farrell submitted to the Commission
an aerial for them to review.
Chairman' Johnson clarified what in his opinion is at issue. He
said it comes down to if the Commission feels three lots are an
appropriate use of the land and if three lots are approved, if
needed,'the variance procedure,would be implemented.
Commissioner Workinger questioned if it is possible to place a home
on Lot 2 without a variance.
A discussion ensued with the Commission observing that the building
pad located on Lot 2 could be moved back farther, but if that would
be the case the rear yard would be minimal.
Commissioner L. Johnson asked the Mr. Farrell if he would favor a
conservation easement on the north part of Lot 1? Mr. Farrell said
he would not be opposed to a conservation easement along the north
part of Lot 1 if a driveway could be constructed through it. A
question was 'brought up if a conservation easement could be
violated by a driveway. Mr. Larsen responded that an easement
could be drafted to accommodate that, but usually property in a
conservation easement is to remain untouched.
Mr. Wurst pointed out if Lot 2is considered a buildable lot there
would be no way to prevent the house from being developed the way
it is depicted on the proposed plat. He stressed there are three
houses right in line along South Knoll and it would be bad planning.
and an unwanted precedent to approve a front yard setback variance.
Commissioner Faust reminded Mr. Wurst the variance board has
control in house placement and would recommend that a house placed
on proposed Lot 2 be located in the least obtrusive place.
Commissioner McClelland agreed with Commissioner Faust and told Mr.
Wurst the subdivision is a logical north /south division and it is
unrealistic to think this property will not be developed.
Mr. Wurst said the proposed division may be logical.but it is not
right. He pointed out every other property along South Knoll had
to maintain the established front yard setback and this property
should also. He reminded Commission the other properties had to
fall in line with the Farrell house which was the first house on
the block.
Commissioner McClelland said the proponent has the right to
develop. She said the confusion seems to be with setbacks and not
if the lot is buildable. Commissioner McClelland said the lot in
question is buildable.
Commissioner Ingwalson questioned if the lot in question is to be
properly developed would house placement violate the front yard
setbacks that have been established. along South Knoll. Continuing,
Commission Ingwalson said if that is the case he cannot support
this division. He reminded the Commission they previously decided
in the Belfry case on Grimes Avenue that the neighborhood was the
special 4200 block along Grimes .even though the proposed lot met
all the standards of the 500 foot neighborhood. Commissioner
Ingwalson added maybe this case should be decided on those same
merits. The property in question is in a unique location where
properties on the block have substantial setbacks. Commissioner
Ingwalson told the Commission that is the reason they must be
careful. If they say this lot is buildable, and in reality the
property cannot be developed without violating the setbacks and
needing a variance that may be a problem.
Mr. Wurst said the property in question occupies a unique spot in
the development of South Knoll. Mr..Wurst pointed out this side of
the street is special, the front yard setbacks are all large and
the lots sizes are large. He added he paid a high price for this
layout and asked the Commission not to violate it by approving a
three lot subdivision and would create a Lot that would have to be
developed with a house that would violate the streetscape.
Commissioner L. Johnson said if this is to be viewed as a three lot
subdivision, two of the lots do not meet the ordinance, the third
as shown with the building pad requires a variance. Commissioner
L. Johnson said if the Commission is to assume that the building
pad depicted on Lot 2 is not present and that building pad is moved
back to correspond with the established front yard setbacks would
the Commission approve a lot with only a 20 or 30 foot rear yard.
Commissioner L. Johnson said he believes all three lots require
some type of variance.
Commissioner Runyan said what is confusing to him is that the
Commission usually has been concerned with neighborhood character
and the protecting of neighborhood symmetry. Commissioner Runyan
said in his opinion, maintaining symmetry is not present in this
layout. He pointed out there is an established front yard setback
on this block, and we should not recommend violation of that
setback. Commissioner Runyan indicated in almost all cases the
variance board has denied front yard setback 'requests. He
acknowledged that the property in question has dense vegetation and
the existing house is not very visible from the street but
cautioned that vegetation should not be confused as screening,
thereby making, subdivision attractive because potential houses may
not be visible from the street.
Commissioner Faust suggested that the subdivision be approved and
the variance question be addressed by the variance board. She
asked if the Commission approves development of Lot 2 can we
recommend that the house meets the setback requirements, and if it
can't, the lot is non - buildable.
Commissioner McClelland said she believes a three lot subdivision
works well with this property, and pointed out if variances are
needed they are minimal.
A discussion ensued on the placement of proposed houses and the
setbacks along South Knoll Drive.
Commissioner L. Johnson questioned if there would still be one
driveway on Blake Road, the proposed plat shows two driveways. Mr.
Larsen said it is his understanding that only one driveway would
serve Blake Road. Commissioner L. Johnson said the topography may
make it necessary for two driveways to be developed. The driveways
could be developed in such a way that there would be only one curb
cut with the driveways branching off to individual properties. Mr.
Larsen said what is depicted is just conceptual and there is room
for redesign.
Mr. Larsen said what the Commission needs to do is to either
rescind their previous action for approval of the two lot
subdivision or keep it as recommended, and vote on either approving
or denying the revised plan presented this evening.
Commissioner Palmer moved to recommend that the proposed three lot
subdivision be denied on the grounds that the three proposed lots
do not work well, if approved, the proposed house on Lot 2 would
create an awkward situation for development, either by violating
the front yard setback or pushing the proposed house so far back
that the rear yard becomes compromised. Commissioner Runyan
seconded the motion.
Commissioner Byron said he believes this request should be decided
on the merits of the subdivision process, not on if, or if not, a
variance may be required on Lot 2, or any of the proposed lots.
The concern over variances, if any'are needed, would then be heard
by the Board of Appeals and Adjustments.
Commissioner Palmer in response to Commissioner Byron said he
understands his position, but believes the. Commission is not
required to approve a subdivision just because variances are not
needed. He added other issues come into play, such as topography,
symmetry, neighborhood character, etc.
Upon Roll Call Vote:
Faust; Nay
L. Johnson; Aye
McClelland, Nay
Runyan; Aye
Palmer; Aye
Workinger;Aye
Ingwalson; Aye
Byron; Nay
Johnson; Nay
Motion carried. 5 -4.
Chairman Johnson clarified for Mr. Farrell and Mr. Worst that what
has occurred this evening is. that the proposed three lot
subdivision request will go to the Council with a recommendation
for denial on a 5 -4 vote. The Council will also receive the
minutes of the August 29, 1990, Commission meeting in which the
Commission. recommended approval of a two lot subdivision request
with a conservation easement along the north along South Knoll.
Mr. Larsen added that he felt the conservation easement included
Lot 1 of the original three lot proposal.
Y
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
AUGUST 29, 1990
S -90 -6 Preliminary Plat Approval
Farrell1d Parkwood Knolls
James and Linda Farrell
5700 Blake Road
The subject property is a developed single family lot containing an
area of 95,700 square feet, or 2.2 acres. The'existing dwelling is
located in the central portion of the lot.
The proposed subdivision.would create two new lots plus a lot for
the existing dwelling. The proposed lot dimensions and sizes are:
Lot Width
Lot Depth
Lot Area
Lot width to
perimeter ratio
Lot 1
117 feet
256 feet
30,100 s.f.
0.16
Lot 2
102 feet
256 feet
30,100 s.f.
0.13
Lot 3
108 feet
273 feet
35,500 s.f.
0.14
Characteristics of the' 45 lots in the 500 foot neighborhood "are as
follows:
Median
Lot
Width
130 feet
Median
Lot
Depth
149 feet
Median
Lot
Area
20,000'square feet
The proposed lots fall between 13 and 28 below the lot width
standard. - Thus, a lot width variance is required for each lot.
The-lots all exceed the neighborhood standard for lot depth and lot
area. Also, all of the lots meet the lot width to perimeter ratio
requirement.
Development of lots 1 and 3 would require removing approximately 33
trees on this heavily wooded site. Approximately 22% of the total
site area contains slopes of 18% or greater. Development would
impact 15% of these sloped areas.
The Subdivision Ordinance requires a conservation easement 100 feet
upland from the ordinary high water elevation of a lake, stream or
pond. Such an easement would be required for the proposed Lot 3.
The house foot print illustrated on Lot 3 encroaches on this
easement area.
Recommendation:
The proposed lots are relatively large. They are larger than most
recent Parkwood Knolls lots. They are also generally larger than
lots on the east side of Blake Road. They are, however, not as
wide as lots in the older Parkwood Knolls plats which abut the
property on the west and north. Staff does have some specific
concerns relative to the development of lots .1 and 3. First, any
development of Lot 1 will require a variance because of the large
setbacks maintained by the homes to the west and to the south.
This is probably a plus. The variance process will ensure that the
property is developed with the least impact on adjacent homes. The
house foot print on Lot 3 encroaches on the required 100 foot
easement area. Staff would not favor reducing this requirement.
Staff would recommend preliminary approval with the requested lot
width variances subject to:
1. Final Plat Approval
2. Recorded 100 foot conservation easement
3. Subdivision Dedication
4. Utility connection charges
.
e
S -90 -6 Preliminary Plat Approval
Farrell's Parkwood Knolls
�X James and Linda Farrell
�,- - 5700 Blake Road
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the subject property is a
developed single family lot containing an area of 95,700 square
feet, or 2.2 acres. The existing dwelling is 'located in the
central portion of the lot.
Mr. Larsen pointed out before them this evening is a revision to
the plan previously submitted. The revised plan depicts two lots
instead of the proposed three lots.
Mr. Larsen concluded staff would recommend preliminary approval
subject to:
1. Final Plat Approval
2. Recorded 100 foot conservation easement
12
3. Subdivision Dedication
4. Utility connection charges
Mr. and Mrs. Farrell were present and their surveyor Randy Stern
was present. Interested.residents were also present.
Commissioner Hale questioned if the driveway for the existing house
would stay. Mr. Larsen responded that the driveway for the
existing house cuts across the property line for the proposed new
lot. Staff would assume that a modification would occur resulting
in a small portion of the driveway being shared and.then breaking
off, continuing to the new proposed house site. This could be
realized with a driveway easement. Mr. Larsen said staff would
support this easement because it is important keep the number of
curb cuts on Blake Road to a minimum. This shared drive approach
would also reduce disruption to the terrain.
Commissioner L. Johnson asked if the Engineering Department has
reviewed the utility services. Mr. Larsen answered that the
Engineering Department has reviewed the water services. He added
the Engineering Department is recommending a minor change to the
sanitary sewer and how it is handled to Blake Road, thereby
avoiding any disruption to the new street. The Engineering
Department believes this would be easy to accomplish. Commissioner
L. Johnson questioned if the existing house is connected to city
services. Mr. Larsen acknowledged that the house at the present
time has a well and is served only by a well. Mr. Larsen said it
is expected if redevelopment would be approved that the existing
house connect to City services. Mr. Larsen indicated they would be
able to keep their well and connect to public services.
Commissioner L. Johnson said disruption to this site would be vast
and the impact to the topographical features would be extreme due
to utility connections, steep terrains, needed fill, retaining
walls, and new house and garage pads, etc., Continuing,
Commissioner L. Johnson said many conditions such as a driveway
easement have to be met to make this kubdivision work.
Commissioner L. Johnson said maybe approval is a bit premature.
Commissioner McClelland said in visiting the site she found that
the houses along South Knoll are all one story ranch style homes.
They are also long sprawling homes with large frontages. She
suggested that the proponents might possibly consider dividing the
property the other way. The lots would be at least 128 feet.wide
and would not be substandard by much,. only a couple feet. She
cautioned if not divided carefully there could be a setup for
dividing the newly created lot in the future, and that is something
the Commission should be aware could happen. Continuing,.
Commissioner McClelland said what has been presented doesn't seem
to fit the topography as well as it might.
13
Mr. Tom Wurst, 6205 South Knoll, said he has been working with
Mr. Farrell regarding his potential subdivision. He explained his
house is setback the same distance from South'-Knoll Drive as Mr.
Farrell. Mr. Wurst explained that Mr. Farrell, with his revision
from three lots to two lots accommodated his concerns over the
three lot subdivision. He added his concerns were to preserve the
wooded slopes and the topography of the area. Mr. Wurst told the
Commission when looking out of his front window if three lots were
approved he believes he would be looking at the rear or side of new
.houses. Mr. Wurst indicated he also spoke with a realtor who said
if another house were to build across the street his property
values would decrease. Continuing, Mr. Wurst said Mr. Farrell has
been very easy to work with and he appreciates his: revisions to the
plan from three,lots to two lots.
Commissioner McClelland clarified for Mr. Wurst that she has a
concern that if the two lot subdivision were approved in the future
the property owners of the larger. lot could petition for
subdivision.
Commissioner Palmer said he commends Mr. Farrell for working with
the neighbors, adding he feels the Commission should not be
hesitant to approve this request because in the future the newly
created lot could be subdivided.
Commissioner Hale asked if a conservation easement could be.
attached to the new lot thereby preventing future subdivision. Mr.
Larsen said that is a possibility and sends a message indicating
you feel it is important to protect this area.
Commissioner L. Johnson questioned if they considered dividing the
property north - south. Mr. Farrell said that was considered but
eliminated because of the impact to South Knoll, also he felt if
the house were to be faced toward Blake more opposition would
occur.
Commissioner L. Johnson said his concern is with the °proposed Lot
3, now I guess Lot 2, the reduced width, retaining walls, 15% drive
slope, fil, etc. He said this property could be subdivided north
south with minimal problems. Mr. Farrell said couldn't the lot
lines just be.moved to get the appropriate width. He pointed out
the steepest slope is where the driveway is at present.
Mr. Larsen said a number of different configurations were looked at
and staff felt what is proposed is- workable. He added the variance
request is not unrealistic and the elimination of the north lot is
desirable.
Commissioner Palmer said he is pleased that the north lot was
eliminated and favors the subdivision as amended. He added he
believes a shared driveway is favorable because in his opinion as
few curb cuts on Blake Road or any road is better. Commissioner
14
Palmer also said he likes the idea presented, by Commission Hale
regarding a conservation easement for Lot 3.
Commissioner McClelland said her concern is with the size of Lot 1
and its potential future development. She said she either feels
this whole area should be platted at one time, with three, or place
a conservation easement on Lot 1. Commissioner McClelland said
maybe this item should be continued to allow the proponents time to
reconfigure the lots so minimal disturbance would occur.
Mr. Farrell said he wanted to work with the residents in the area
and also wanted to carefully create a desirable lot. He added he
plans on building a new house on the lot
Commissioner Palmer said what the Commission has to vote on is what
is presented, which is a subdivision creating one new lot.
Commissioner L. Johnson asked Mr. Farrell if he is agreeable to a
conservation easement being placed on the new lot. Mr. Farrell
questioned if a conservation easement would prohibit him from
changing his driveway or adding a garage. Mr. Larsen clarified
that if a conservation easement is placed on this lot you would
have to come before the Commission with a request to reconfigure
your driveway, etc. Mr. Farrell asked if this would restrict
himself or a future owner from doing what they want with their
property. He said he would favor the easement if it wouldn't
prevent them of anyone else from doing simple changes to this lot.
Commissioner Hale asked Mr. Farrell if he has spoken with neighbors
to the south. Mr. Farrell said he has not spoken to all neighbors
but the property owners of the doubles have no problem with what is
proposed..
Commissioner Palmer moved to recommend preliminary plat approval
subject to staff conditions and the further conditions that a
conservation easement be placed on Lot 1 and that a common driveway
be used to enter /exit the property. Commissioner Hale seconded the
motion. All voted aye, motion carried.
IV. ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 10:50 p.m.
Jackie Hoogenakker, Secretary
15
KNOLL OR /V6 Q r; X018
'89
,all
SAMITA.V
..�
ma l000llso �0101.
—AME JL.
w. -,I
••
SO KAYMAR OR .3;.. I-
br.w
W.wr.w
_., ffxmm
warts 08*v?ft loGN0111MANNIA 11016MMKOPIND ".Mom
oarrw z qj
L
ILI I—. IT0110"Alloo
AP•INN111khtVILT w• OF KON AMA WU Ill
w Z, Moo"
sllultlmalrw mwwlawolwa 10110111 w O.M." w
I 1,40,0'a •lo►
on-spur own
to 0
A.
.—o%om
L ol"'S'
L&B 6'""— N 31 :,I.=
aft•k—Lo""•'
LW.D oobr IN
L 16 k%WM"'w-=oM-
La
I&sLvluwp.w
Mot
ma""m Me .91 Mm
twea.mu"NoINK 11 L...
,mL oollAS
LA.1%. 000lLM vwwW 'ii iii
8. l.",
LI IN I.=
Im t
L&b.
gy
Ll
LIN'
= M to.
Y• 0000,•000— •1.
oota
'N' IoMo,om-
ul
am
-i
PFAPOM LN
P••p•m im
Millo
Of.'
go
%CAL4 IN Pwa r
(JTy
KNOB
sANM�� -- OR1VE i
- -�" cis -__/$9. 00 _z9/ -_- __ -- — - �•�•,' yq,Vi 9 �
• v N -- • c,/
^ �: 52.00
-c s '—�
e,P e23.
�
\Flo J lie
-4-\911 1 �9e � II
0 I2I
{t
iA wpusi lS7ao o'e \r ? �•
qtr
`^ ` .•'� {�t, �� � r.4 Ems
:. %: .. %�X:%`.Ni� 'tom �•• �`` M
McD,AEV 2 tit
pstaf 0 s A&L...
ptff fooeo d/zj
0
♦♦W^^
V/
W
' I
tw op
\.
6n
LOT WIDTH TO PERWETER RATIO LOT WIDTH LOT DEPTH LOT AREA
PROPOSED LOT 1 22.20% 219 256 60,200
PROPOSED LOT 2 13.80% 108 273 35,500
THOMSEN
NYBECK
JOHNSON
BOUQUIRIT
VAN VALHENBURG
OHNS AD
SNnn- P.A.
LAW OFFICES
SUITE 600, EDINBOROUGH CORPORATE CENTER EAST
3300 EDINBOROUGH WAY, MINNEAPOLIS (EDINA), MINNESOTA 55435
(612) 835 -7000 • FAX: (612) 835 -9450
GLENN O. NYBECK MARSHJ.HALBERG OF COUNSEL,
GORDON V. JOHNSON WILLIAM E. SJOHOLM
JACK W. CARLSON
JOHN K. BOUQUET THOMAS R. KELLEY - RICHARD D. WILSON, P-4-
JAMES VAN VALKENBURG DENNIS M. PATRICK HELGE THOMSEN. RETIRED
MARK O. OHNSTAD PHILIP SIEFF
DONALD O. SMITH DAVID J. MCGEE
November 172, 1990
The Honorable Frederick Richards
and Members of City Council
RE: James & Linda Farrell
5700 Blake Road
Dear Mayor Richards and
Council'Members:
NU
I wrote to you about this matter on,October 17, 1990 and
we have postponed this for hearing until November 19th.
I would hope that you would contact the Farre111t' and
visit the property so that you can better visualize what they are
attempting to do 1n this lot division and platting.
I am enclosing some new drawings which portray the
situation a little clearer then the ones I sent before and there
are a couple of changes in these drawings.
First I point out to you the fact that the average lot
width for the "neighborhood" lots is 126 feet, with a depth of
163 f,-,et and the lot area of 21.000.
You will also -see on there the median and also the
dimensions of the proposed lots that we are referring to. As you
will- see,.these new lots are all substantially higher than any of
the lots in the neighborhood.
Incidentally. neighborhood here is construed to mean
property within 500 feet of the Farrell's lot.
In developing this property we are attempting to do a
number of things.
-2-
1. Save as many trees as possible.
2. Create -an open space easement over a good part
of Lots 1 and 2 to the north of the existing
house and proposed house.
3. To create a conservation easement for the 100
feet to the south which, abuts the pond.
In addition we intend to create some building rests fic-
tions that will govern the height, mass, and location of any home
built on Lots 2 and 3 and in,particular.Lot 2.,.
As to Lot 2, it is our intention to put on a restriction
that would require that any home to be built would line up
essentially with the two properties immediately to the west. The
Wurst home which is' immediately to the west of the Farrell home by
our survey is 125 feet from the lot line and the home to the west
of that is 121 feet. The existing Farrell home is 137 feet.
We have discussed this with several builders and they
indicate that the proposed-location of a home on Lot 2 is doable.
Mr. Wurst has expressed the most concern on this
property development and that is the reason we are talking about
open space easements and restrictions that will protect him. As a
practic?1 matter we do not think that any construction here will
affect him. His lot is also a heavily wooded lot. He has agreed
that the construction of a home on Lot 3 would not have any effect
on him.
As to this drawing as opposed to the prior one .I want to
state a couple of things. The proposed Lot 1 would have a
frontage of 126 feet which is essentially a request for a minor
variance of 4 feet.-
The rear line between Lots 1, 2 and 3 has been altered
to create a larger back yard for Lot 2 and to accommodate the
construction of a home in that area.
The Ordinance requires 130 feet in Lot 3 at a distance
of 50 feet from the easterly lot line. Craig Larsen indicates
that this rule is primarily to acknowledge that most people would
build their home there and it needs that width. Our plan is to
-3-
build further south and west and thus we do not feel that that 130
feet is essential.
If YOU feel it necessary we can move the line back, but
our purpose in moving it is to create a bigger backyard for both
Lots 1 and 2.
To get the feel of this lot I do strongly urge that you
contact -the Farrell's and walk the -property so that you can see
the proposed -location of homes and also .a general idea as to the
size of the lots. These lots -will be substantial in size and I
feel will improve the lots and will obviously 'produce homes of
substantial value. We are not talking about small homes here: It
is our estimate that any home built on Lot 2 or 3 would be in the
$400,000 range.
The Farrell's plan to sell their existing home and build
on Lot 3.
I will be back in the office on November 16th and if
there are any questions on this I would appreciate it if you would
call, or if you prefer I would be happy to meet you at the
property.
In the meantime I wish you would contact Mr. and Mrs.
Farrell:
Home
Mr. Farrell
938 -1618
829 -3442
I might say that we have been in contact with Mr. Wurst
who has studied this situation and obviously will speak for
himself at the hearing. I might say that he has been hesitant to
walk the property and to deal directly with the Farrell's as he
does not wish to speak with them because they are in fact
represented by an attorney. That -is consistent with the Lawyers
Code of Ethics.
Sin /"
James Van Valkenb
JVV:jd `
Encl.
cc: Tom Wurst
P. S. Enclosed is a draft of the last Planning Commission meeting
and I have highlighted some of the comments made.
JVV
DRAFT
S -90 -6 Preliminary Plat Approval,
Farrells Parkwood Knolls,
5700 Blake Road
Mr. Larsen asked the Commission to recall they recommended approval
of -a two lot subdivision of the subject property at its last
meeting. originally proposed as a three lot plat,. it was modified
to two at the meeting. Mr. Larsen added the proponent's have
elected to return to the Commission and propose a revised three lot
plat.
Mr. Larsen concluded that staff concern is not with the size of the
proposed lots, but'the manner in which Lot 2 would be developed.
He explained the revised plat insures that the house will be
developed with maximum separation from the existing home on South
Knoll Drive. Mr. Larsen indicated development of this lot will
require a front and probably a side street variance. Mr. Larsen
pointed out the need for variances may,.be a positive since it
allows the City more control,:- '.;over the development of the lot..
The proponents, Mr. and Mrs. Farrell were present. Mr. Wurst, 6205
South Knoll Drive an interested neighbor was present.
Commissioner L. Johnson questioned Mr. Larsen on the probability of
aside street setback variance being needed for Lot 2. Mr. Larsen
explained a corner lot in certain instances has to maintain two
front yard setbacks. This property must maintain setbacks from
Blake Road as well as South Knoll Drive.
Mr._ Farrell told the Commission during the last meeting his
proposal was heard after a very long, emotional hearing regarding
home occupations. He explained he was very tired and his revised
proposal from three lots to two lots was made very late which
caused confusion for the Planning Commission and for him. He
reminded the Commission the reason for a change to the original
plat was to accommodate concerns expressed by his neighbor, Mr.
Wurst. Continuing, he said he indicated at the past meeting that
he supported placement of a conservation easement on one of the two
lots. Mr. Farrell told the Commission at that time, and at
present, he is unclear on where or what the conservation easement
would be. Mr. Farrell noted all he wants is to build a new house
for his family on proposed Lot 3. Mr. Farrell stated he believes
the proposal as presented would increase the value of the neighbors
homes and be a plus for the entire area. If he sold his property
this issue would, in reality, come up again, and the proposed three
lot subdivision affords a measure of control over development. Mr.
Farrell concluded that the building pads located on the proposed
plat are indicated as required by the new ordinance. They are not
set in concrete, there is room for redesign and a change to what
has been illustrated.
Mr. Wurst indicated he was confused. He said he thought this
matter was settled with a two lot subdivision. He told the
Commission if a three lot subdivision is approved the new house
would harm his property due to the decreased setback from South
Knoll. He pointed out the proposed building pad depicts a front
yard setback that is less than the three homes located on the
block. He added if .a house were allowed to be developed when he
walks out his front door he would see the rear or at the very least
the side of the- proposed new house. He added he feels it is not
aesthetically pleasing and not appropriate for a home to be
constructed in front of other homes. Mr. Wurst added another
concern of his is that he did not receive re- notice of the change
to the Farrells - plat.
Mr. Farrell pointed out that a three lot subdivision would create
three new lots that are respectively numbers 4, 5, and 9 in size
within the entire 500 foot radius. neighborhood. He added the
variance process would afford protection by locating the proposed
home on Lot 2 in the proper place. Regarding notifying the
neighbors, Mr. Farrell said renotification was not needed because
what is presented this evening is a three lot subdivision very
similar to what was originally proposed, and notified for.
Mr. Wurst pointed out the elevations of the Farrell property should,
be taken into consideration when the property is being studied for
subdivision. He said the drop in elevations is substantial and the
height of the proposed new house would be a concern. Mr. Wurst
questioned the hardship in supporting a three lot subdivision
versus the approved two lot subdivision that would not require any
variances.
Commissioner L. Johnson told the Commission he felt this was a
"done deal". He pointed out the proposal this evening is different
from what was approved and maybe re- notification should have
occurred. Commissioner L. Johnson continued that' he felt the
cpnservation easement or scenic easement ran along the north
portion of the new lot on the South Knoll side.of the property.
Commissioner Palmer said when he first reviewed the plans submitted
and visited the site he observed what he felt were problems with a
three lot subdivision. He added when he learned the proponents
withdrew their request for a three lot subdivision and submitted a
revised plan at the Commission meeting illustrating two lots
instead of the proposed three he was delighted. He said he has a
problem supporting the three lot proposal when he finds no hardship
and a variance is required.
Commissioner McClelland reminded the Commission at the last meeting
it was suggested that the proponent's consider dividing the
proposal north and south. She added the proponents should not be
penalized for not understanding what happened at the last meeting.
This issue .was heard after a emotional lengthy hearing and the
confusion that occurred resulting from their change in plans is
something that should be recognized.
Mr. Larsen responded to the question and confusion regarding
notices. He reminded the Commission the Planning Commission is a
public meeting, not a public hearing. A public hearing requires
notification, a public meeting does not. He explained a condition
of the newly adopted subdivision ordinance states that: =:properties
within °_5 00 -� f eet� - of :�-the7'-property"-�' in!' question,` 'are�to._,- be�notif ied ::.that.
a.= process,; for subdivision hasp commenced-�10 .days . before the: request.
s heard ,by -,the 'Planning CO is requirement °has been
fulf ill led "attlieComirission: °level as the Farrells are technically
in the subdivision process. Mr. Larsen in responding to the
questions regarding hardship added if a lot is approved with the
knowledge of a variance being needed, a hardship is recognized.
Commissioner McClelland pointed out the proponent is only two feet
short of what is stipulated by ordinance and the variance request
on the lot in question would be minimal. She stressed that the
proponents expressed they had no clear understanding of what
occurred at the Commission meeting and no understanding of what
they agreed to. She commented she felt some consideration should
be given to the proponents and added she finds it surprising some
members are having difficulty in approving a three lot subdivision
that may need a slight variance. Commissioner Runyan suggested
that the issue of a two lot subdivision versus three lot
subdivision may exist with the alignment of the proposed three
lots, the topography, placement of the existing house, curb cuts,
and conservation concerns, not just if or if not variances are
needed.
Commissioner Faust said she feels the lot in question is large
enough to accommodate three lots. She pointed out Edina is an
urban city and Mr. Wursts concern regarding viewing a house out of
his front yard is something that occurs within a City environment.
Commissioner Faust pointed out the newly proposed lots are well
within the median range of lot size, and in fact are larger than
most lots within the area.
Commissioner Byron said the issue of notices not being mailed in a
sense is a mute point. He reminded the Commission at the last
meeting action was taken on a proposal that was different than what
was presented and no new notices were mailed. He said in his
opinion he believes the notice requirement at the Commission level
has been satisfied. Commissioner Byron noted at this meeting,
whatever is decided, the outcome should be clear to the proponent
and the Commission. Continuing he added he believes if a three lot
subdivision is approved the issue of house placement can be dealt
with adequately through the variance procedure.
Chairman Johnson said acting as "devil's advocate" inquired if a
lot is allowed to be created, is the Commission signaling it is
buildable? Commissioner McClelland said she believes a variance
may not be needed on Lot 2. The building pad depicted on the plat
for Lot 2 could be moved back farther, therefore not requiring a
variance.
Mr. Farrell reminded the Commission the subdivision process
requires that a building pad be illustrated on preliminary plats.
Mr. Farrell said he.believes the building pad for Lot 2 has been
located in the best place. Mr. Parrell submitted to the Commission
an aerial for them to review.
Chairman 'Johnson clarified what in his opinion 'is at issue. He
said it comes down to if the Commission feels three lots are an
appropriate use of the land and if three lots are approved, -if
needed, the variance procedure would be implemented.
Commissioner, Workinger questioned if it is possible to place a home
on Lot 2 without a variance.
A discussion ensued with the Commission observing that the building
pad located on Lot 2 could be moved back farther, but if that would
be the case the rear yard would be minimal.
P
Commissioner L. Johnson asked the Mr. Farrell if he would favor a
conservation easement on the north part of Lot 1? Mr. Farrell said
he would not be opposed to a conservation easement along the north
part of Lot 1 if-- a'driveway could be constructed through it. A
question was brought up if a: ,conservation . easement . could be-
violated by a driveway. Mr. Larsen responded that an easement
could be drafted to accommodate that, but usually property in a
conservation easement is to remain untouched.
Mr. Wurst pointed out if Lot 2 is considered a buildable lot there
would be no way to prevent the house from being developed the way
it is depicted on the proposed plat. He stressed' there are three
houses right in line along South Knoll and it would be bad planning
and an unwanted precedent to approve a front yard setback. variance.
Commissioner Faust reminded. Mr. Wurst the variance board has
control in house placement and would recommend that a house placed
on proposed Lot 2 be located in the least obtrusive place.
Commissioner McClelland agreed with Commissioner Faust and told Mr.
Wurst the subdivision is a logical north /south division and it is
unrealistic to think this property will not be developed.'
Mr. Wurst said the proposed division may be logical but it is not
right. He pointed out every other property along South Knoll had
to maintain the established front yard setback and this property
should also. He reminded Commission the other properties had to
fall in line with the Farrell house which was the first house on
the block.
Commissioner McClelland said the proponent has the right. to
develop. She said the confusion seems to be with setbacks and not
if the lot is buildable. Commissioner McClelland said the lot in
question is buildable.
M
Commissioner Ingwalson questioned if the lot in question is to be
properly developed would house placement violate the front yard
setbacks that have been established along South Knoll. Continuing,
Commission Ingwalson said if that is the case he cannot support
this division. He reminded the Commission they previously decided
in the Belfry case-on Grimes Avenue that the neighborhood was the
special 4200 block along Grimes even though the proposed lot met
all the standards of the 500 foot neighborhood. Commissioner
Ingwalson added maybe this case should be decided on those same
merits. The property in question is in a unique location where
properties on the block have substantial setbacks. Commissioner
Ingwalson told the, Commission that is the reason they must be
careful. If they say this lot is buildable, and in reality the
property cannot be developed without violating the. setbacks and
needing a variance that may be a problem.
Mr. Wurst said the property in question occupies a unique spot in
the development of South Knoll. Mr. Wurst pointed out this side of
the street is special, the front yard setbacks are all large and
the lots.sizes ate large. He added he paid a high price for this
layout and asked the Commission not to 'violate it by approving a
three lot subdivision and would create a Lot that would have to be
developed with a house that would violate the streetscape.
Commissioner L., Johnson said if this is to be viewed as a three lot
subdivision, two of the lots do not meet the ordinance, the third
as shown with the building pad requires a variance. Commissioner
L. Johnson said if the Commission is to assume that the building
pad depicted on Lot 2 is not present and that building pad is moved
back to correspond with the established front yard setbacks would
the Commission approve a lot with only a 20 or 30 foot rear yard.
Commissioner L. Johnson said he believes all three lots require
some type of variance.
Commissioner Runyan said what is confusing to him is that the
Commission usually has been concerned with neighborhood character
and the protecting of neighborhood symmetry. Commissioner Runyan
said in his opinion maintaining symmetry in not present in this
layout. He pointed out there is.an established.front yard setback
on this block and we should not violate that setback. Commissioner
Runyan indicated in almost all cases the variance board has denied
front yard setback requests. He acknowledged that the property in
question has dense vegetation and the existing house is not very
visible from the street but cautioned that vegetation should not be
confused as screening, thereby making subdivision attractive
because potential houses may not be visible from the street.
Commissioner Faust suggested that the subdivision be approved. and
the variance question be addressed by the variance board. . She
asked if the Commission approves- development of Lot 2 can we
recommend that the house meets the setback requirements, and if it
can't, the lot is-non-buildable.
Commissioner McClelland said she believes a three lot subdivision
works well with this property, and pointed out if variances are
needed they are minimal.
A discussion ensued on the placement of proposed houses and the
setbacks along South Knoll Drive.
Commissioner L. Johnson questioned if there would still be one
driveway on Blake Road, the proposed plat shows two driveways. Mr.
Larsen said it is his understanding that only one driveway would
serve Blake Road. Commissioner L. Johnson said the topography may
make it' necessary for two driveways to be developed. The driveways
could be developed in such a way that there would be only one curb
cut with the driveways branching off to individual properties. Mr.
Larsen said what is depicted is just conceptual and there is room
for redesign.
Mr. Larsen said what the Commission needs to do is to either
rescind their previous action for approval of the two lot
subdivision or keep it as recommended, and vote on either approving
or denying the revised plan presented this evening.
Commissioner Palmer moved to recommend that the proposed three lot
subdivision be denied on the grounds that the three proposed lots
do not work well, if approved, the proposed house on Lot 2 would
create an awkward situation for development, either by violating
the front yard setback or pushing 'the proposed house so far back
that the rear yard becomes compromised. Commissioner Runyan
seconded the motion.
Commissioner Byron said he believes this request should be decided
on the merits of the subdivision process, not on if, or if not,,a
variance may be required on Lot 2, or any of the proposed lots.
The concern over variances, if any are needed, would then be heard
by the Board of Appeals and Adjustments.
Commissioner Palmer in response to Commissioner Byron said he
understands his position, but believes the Commission is not
required to approve a subdivision just because variances are not
needed. He added other issues come into play, such as topography,
symmetry, neighborhood character, etc.
Upon Roll Call Vote:
Faust; Nay
L. Johnson; Aye
McClelland, Nay
Runyan; Aye
Palmer; Aye
workinger;Aye
Ingwalson; Aye
Byron; Nay
Johnson; Nay
r
Motion carried. 5 -4.
Chairman Johnson clarified for Mr. Farrell and Mr. Worst that what
has occurred this evening, is that the proposed three lot
subdivision request will go to the Council with a. recommendation_
for denial on a 5 -4 vote. The Council will also receive the
minutes of the August 29, 1990, Commission meeting in which the
Commission recommended approval of a two lot subdivision request
with a conservation easement along the north along South Knoll.
Mr. Larsen added that he felt the conservation easement included
Lot 1 of the original three lot proposal.
I
October 4, 1990
Mr. Craig Larson
Planning Director
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
I -I
is iL/ r
Re: Proposed subdivision of Tract A, Registered Land
Survey No. 1286, Hennepin County, Minnesota
Property' -- Adjoining South Knoll Drive and Blake Road
Dear Mr. Larson:
This will confirm our telephone discussion of October 3, 1990
re the-above matter.
'The proposed subdivision of Tract A above described is to be
heard by the City Council at its meeting on October 15, 1990
commencing at 7:00 p.m.
You agreed to forward to me the following documents:
1. Copies of the Minutes of the Edina Planning Commission
re its. meetings of August 29, 1990 and September 27,
1990.
2. Copies of any new revised Subdivision Plan which is filed
and to be presented to the City Council on October 15 by
Jim Farrell.
3. Copies of any reports, etc. you will be submitting to the
City Council for its consideration in connection with the
action it will take on October 15,1990.
It is my understanding from our telephone discussion on
October 3, that under the three lot subdivision proposed by Jim
Farrell, which was denied by the Planning Commission, the same
would require a variance for his proposed new northerly lot because
it does not conform to the neighborhood standard for lot width
which is 130 feet measured at a point 50 feet back from the curb
line. Also, if that residence lot was approved (in front of the
'f 1
Mr. Craig Larson
-2-
October 4, 1990
present residence on Tract A) the requirements of the City of Edina
for a building permit to erect a residence thereon requires the
residence be set back from South Knoll Drive a distance equal to-
the average of the setbacks for the residences that presently exist
on the south side of South Knoll Drive. This would not be
possible.
For your information there are three residences along South
Knoll Drive (which face north) between Blake Road and View Lane.
Those residences are owned by Farrell, myself and Joas. There are
no open building lots on the south side of Knoll Drive between,
Blake Road and View Lane.
As soon as the documents are available which are to be
forwarded to me kindly forward the same. In the event any of the
documents are not now available forward the others as soon as
possible.
Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation.
ATW:csk
Very truly .yours,
A. Thomas Wurst
6205 South Knoll Drive
Edina, Minnesota 55436
•
PAuL1C7JOhS._
X
7j
Vt
"A
4�
.4.
C 2P •
August = 22•; 1990
M
Edina-City- PlAiminig-'-%commis Sion--
4801.West 50th..Str_eet.
-Edina. MM. '5 57 42. 4-;
Edina )1•a'nnxnq_-Commii;s3.on: ;.� ............... " .......
I.Zwould like*- 'tOz:-gq .,:on- record that.--. ainst the
theme I-Seird-b Bla
subdiVI-Sion: of. 16.t:7 5 TOO,
(FarrelL. p3ppperty'') lime: at- 62A 9 Sduth-Knoll_ VeM% EU
corner .o Suuth:Knoll and Blake:As=atvery bu.
sy— -
AP 7 Z.�L
traffic area:--and..traffic continues- --ta'i'd im- atical Y!l�lill5l"-."i-",��.--�-x'-
increase each,�Ypar: down Blake and..-Souih!kn-'oll._
three residences--ion.-:this corner. im:a.-::c1b:se--proxi
would hurt�al 1'of�. the. surrounding ..ne-Lg hbors .. in S-,
More traffic•- congestion, property va.lVeisi:
I.. -would appreciate if you would ple'a_S_ ejjep me.. ii, T
how the planning-commission decides.,' -IT-can be-re 6&
the day at7_-371-';-7998'and at night-- at±.9 3'5-=l 2 0 5.
R s tfull.y ubmitted,
Paul K.'-Joas--
.6,209:S,.-K*Ox.x_DWrV'E EDINA. MMMSO�Mi
(6121 935-M)jM.7
N;
W
g
r,
aw
�Y.
All
O,
.
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: KENNETH ROSLAND
FROM: DAVID VELDE
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: NOVEMBER 11, 1990
-
AGENDA ITEM
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Collection of Garbage /Refuse
from City
properties.
Company
Amount of Quote or
B'id
1•
Aagard Environmental Services
1.
$5.89
per cubic
yd.
2.
Browning Ferris Industries
2.
$6.72
per cubic
yd.
3.
Waste Management
3.
$7.76
per cubic
yd.
4.
4.
5.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Aagard Environmental Services at $5.89 per cubic yard.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Bid specifications were mailed to nine licensed commercial refuse haulers.
The bid from Aagard Environmental Services is 20 cents per cubic yard
higher than the present contract. Estimated annual cost for refuse.
removal from City properties for 1991 is $41,896.80.
Signature
The Recommended bid is
within budget not
Health Department
Dep j' t
x ji
Director
Kenneth Rosland City Manager
-; While this item is not within budget we tend to be within budget for the general
fund through cost savings in other areas.
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: November 15, 1990
- -TO: Ken Rosland, City Manager
FROM: John Wallin, Finance Director
SUBJECT: Refuse Hauling Budgets
Even though the increase in the Aagard bid,over the present
contract is 20 cents per cubic ,yard, or about 3.4 %, the
increases in budgeted refuse hauling for the City over the
past couple of years has only increased about 1% annually.
The departments that I would estimate as spending over the
budget are:
.Budget Estimated
Fire $600 $1,800
Public Works Building $4,000 $6,500
Public Works Street $4,000 $6,500
These three - departments have extensive budgets and the
.amount actually spent over the budget should be able to be
picked up by spending under the budget in other categories.
j
° REQUEST FOR PORCH
�q s: ASE
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE 19 November, 1990
AGENDA ITEM IV. B.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Skid Steer Loader with Attachments
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Case Power & Equipment 1. $ 26,765.00
2. Lano Equipment, Inc. 2. $ 30,323.50
3.
3
4.
4.
5.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Case Power & Equipment $ 26,765.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This purchase is a new skid loader with attachments. It replaces
Unit No. 25-430,.a 1974 John Deere skid loader. This purchase is
from the equipment replacement fund.
Public Works - Streets
Si atur
The Recommended bid is
within budget not withiprbudd�i
Kenneth
City
Wallin, 6Inance Director
° REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000
DATE. 19 November, 1990
AGENDA ITEM iv. c.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Fuel Monitoring System
Company Amount of Quote or &d
1. Westside Equipment $ 10,362.00
2. Pump & Meter Service, Inc. 2. $ 12,535.00
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Westside Equipment $ 10,362.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This is the purchase of a fuel monitoring system which is now
required by state law for environmental protection. This equipment
is attached to existing fuel tanks. The purchase is funded from
the 1990 capital plan funds.
i
Public Works - Streets
The Recommended bid is
within budget not withirybudg4
Kenneth Rosland City
Director
k 1J,
° , N' REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
' ,.<.�, a 0.
TO: Mayor Richards and City C6uncil
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director Park and Recreation Department
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5000
DATE: November 15, 1990
AGENDA ITEM IV. D
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Driving Range Tractor To Pick Up Balls.
Company Amount of Quote or &d
1• North Star Turf
2 • Toro
3. Cushman
4.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR END:
North Star Turf
GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. $6,105.00
2. $6,985.00
3. $7,389.50
4.
5.
The tractor is used to pull the ball picking machine at the golf
course driving range. The tractor is being ordered before
January 1, 1991 for cost savings. During the winter the park
maintenance crew will build a cage around the tractor to protect
the driver from golf balls.
This tractor will replace a 1979 418 John Deere Tractor.
The Recommended bid is
within budget
a-1
c.
O
TO:
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
CITY COUNCIL
FROM: GORDON L. HUGHES, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00
DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 1990 AGENDA ITEM IV.E.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: 50TH & FRANCE SEASONAL BANNERS
Company Amount of Quote or &d
1. BANNER CREATIONS
1.
$ 5,275
2. ARTISTIC SCREENING
2.
7,905
3. DISPLAY SALES
3.
8,516
4.
4.
5.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
BANNER CREATIONS
GENERAL INFORMATION:
The subject bid is for nylon banners to be placed within the new street
light and pedestrian light standards on 50th & France.' (See attached
sketch). The light standards were designed to accommodate such
banners. The banners do not contain any advertising or messages - the
purpose is to add color during the winter season.
Signature
The Recommended bid is
1f1)
within budget not within
Kenneth Rosland, City
allin, FiWce Director
_., METAL GLOBES TO HAVE CLEAR, TEMPERED
GLASS LENS BOTTOM
LUMINAIRE ENCLOSURE: 27" DIA. X 16" DP. ALUM.
WITH 4 FOUR BARS, 90°APART
MINIMUM OPENING SIZE FOR ACCESS DOORS m
IS TO BE 6 INCHES
' 2' -6"
i
n�
�- - 7—
\\
I \I
I.
3 1/2" O.D.
ALUM., PIPE
TYPE A -2
DOUBLE
PEDESTRIAN
io
N
r
.11,
m
2"
3"
0
N
3"
1' -2"
I
\ \I
�I
V
I�
TYPE A -1
SINGLE
2' -.6
12" DIA.
GLOBE,
TYPICAL I-
2, 3/4" ALUM. PIPE REMON
BANNER ROD, TYPICAL
i
3 1/2" O.D.
ALUM. PIPE
3/4"
MINUTES
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
NOVEMBER 13, 1990
9:00 A.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Craig G. Swanson
Gordon Hughes
Alison Fuhr
MEMBERS ABSENT: Fran Hoffman, Chairman
Bob Sherman
OTHERS PRESENT: Mr. Tom Oestreich, 5220 Eden Avenue
Mr. Brad Hokanson, 5409 Abbott Place
Mr. Jeff Meyer, 50th and France Business Association
Mr. Art Dickey, 4930 France Avenue South
Mr. Alan.Siegman, 3940 West 50th Street
Mr. Carl Weisser, 6566 France Avenue South
Mr. James Wilson, 3225 West 54th Street
Captain Len Kleven, Edina Police Department
Officer Kris Eidem, Edina Police Department
Ms. Joan Waterstreet, Edina Police Department
n
SECTION A
V, (A)
Requests on which the Committee recommends approval as requested or modified and
the Council's authorization of recommended action.
(1) Discuss traffic and pedestrian safety concerns at West 66th Street and
France Avenue.
Request received from Carl Weisser, Manager, Point of France Association,
6566 France Avenue South.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Swanson began by stating that the Committee had reviewed the City's
plan for the area. Mr. Weisser was asked to present his concerns to the
Committee. Mr. Wiesser stated that there is presently a sign for westbound
traffic just east of Point of France driveway which states "SIGNAL YOUR
TURN ". However, he has observed that most eastbound traffic tends to think
this means to signal the direction at the intersection of Valley View Road,
and therefore there are several near misses for those turning right into
the complex's driveway. He asked if the present sign might be moved west
of the driveway and that some sort of signing be placed to denote that
there are turn movements ahead for those wanting to turn into the drive-
way. He also asked for consideration of a separate turn lane being cut to
allow access to the driveway and also for the intersection to be studied
with regard to the difficulty of pedestrian crossing of France Avenue.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES
November 13, 1990
Page 2
Mrs. Fuhr stated that she felt any improvement costs with regard to cutting
additional turn lanes would probably have to be bore by the complex.
Also, Mr. Swanson stated that, as France Avenue is a county road, any
pedestrian safety reviews would need to by conducted by the County.
Mr. Huehes moved to relocate the "SIGNAL YOUR TURN" sign west of the drive-
way to Point of France, to have the Engineering Department review the site
for possible ways to cut a turn lane for westbound traffic into the complex
and /or appropriate signing and pass on to City Council and to recommend
to the City Council to pass a resolution to Hennepin County to review the
pedestrian safety issues at West 66th Street and France Avenue. Mrs. Fuhr
seconded the motion. Motion carried 3 -0.
SECTION B
Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request.
None.
SECTION C
Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others.
(1) Request to.end West 54th Street at Zenith Avenue and create a cul -de -sac.
Continued from October 1990 meeting.
Request for four -way "STOP" signs at West 54th Street and Abbott Avenue/
Place (currently uncontrolled).
Petition received from numerous area residents.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Swanson, acting as Chairman for the Committee, asked that both agenda
Items (1) and (2) be considered simultaneously, as they both directly
affect the same common area. He asked Captain Kleven if there was any
new data to review since the October meeting.
Captain Kleven stated that speed surveys had been conducted on West 54th
Street between France Avenue and Zenith, and especially concentrated in
the area of Beard Avenue. The results of these surveys showed that the
85 percentile speed of traffic was in excess of acceptable tolerances.
Since these surveys were begun, the Traffic Enforcement Unit had been
assigned.to this area and this assignment would continue for at least
another month to hopefully act as a deterrent to speeders. Mr.'Swanson
concluded that speed did seem to be a critical problem in the area, and
Captain Kleven concurred with this assessment.
Mr. Wilson stated that he initially had contacted Edina Public Works and
Engineering Departments inquiring about the possibility of creating a
cul -de -sac at West 54th and Zenith Avenue. Initially, he was told this
may not be the most feasible solution, so other options such as a "STOP"
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES
November 13, 1990
Page 3
sign were discussed. Mr. Hokanson related that he had circulated a peti-
tion to neighbors requesting a "STOP" sign at West 54th and Abbott Avenue/
Place, as it seemed the more reasonable solution. He also stated that
there are no controls at present at this intersection and the caution one
must use when proceeding through the intersection is such that a complete
stop is necessary even without signing.
Mr. Hughes asked about Minneapolis' pattern of stopping at alternating
intersections throughout their city and how does it reflect at West 54th
and Abbott. Mr. Hokanson said that an additional "STOP" sign would need
to be added to the Minneapolis side in order to keep this pattern, as only
the north /south streets are stopped at this time,
Mrs. Fuhr moved that Minneapolis be contacted with the idea of continuation
of their Rresent signing attern on the border streets with consideration
being given to further placement of "STOP" signs on West 54th within our
City limits, and also that more warning signs be placed at the curve on
West 54th and Zenith Avenue. Motion seconded by Mr. Hughes. Motion
carried 3 -0.
(2) Request to change "Hours of Limited Parking" signage in 49 -1/2 Street
Municipal Parking Facility.
Request received from 50th and France Business and Professional Associa-
tion.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Alan Siegman began by correcting the agenda request to include not
only the 49 -1/2 Street ramp, but also the 51st Street ramp. The request
by the Association, in essence, was to enforce only the 1 -Hour parking
areas of the ramps from Thanksgiving through Christmas, but allow parking
for unlimited periods in all other signed areas. They explained that they
are reviewing several issues regarding the ramps, employee parking, customer
concerns, etc., and that their request was a temporary solution through
the holidays until a final plan could be offered to the City Council.
This finalized plan would not be available until after the first of the
year.
Mr. Swanson stated that from a law enforcement standpoint, ramp parking
enforcement had always been hard to do, but he felt a balance could be
found to accommodate all needs. However, he is opposed to the idea of
enforcing the law and then temporarily not enforcing the law. Enforce-
ment in all areas is used as a tool to instruct the general public on
proper and lawful conduct. Therefore as a law enforcement person, he
would not be comfortable taking the position that this temporary measure
is acceptable. Mr. Swanson felt that any changes to the ramp parking
policy should be handled by measure of a resolution from the City Council
and not by the Traffic Safety Committee.
Mr. Hughes stated that he also felt the Council had the ultimate author-
ity to change our ordinance regarding parking time restrictions and he
had had the Association approach the Committee as a matter of policy
based on past parking ramp considerations.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES
November 13, 1990
Page 4
Mr. Hughes moved to pass the item on to City Council for review and possible
change by resolution. Mrs. Fuhr seconded the motion. Motion carried 3 -0.
(3) Discuss traffic safety and signing concerns at West 66th Street and Valley
View extension. '
Request received from Ms. Beth DeLap, 6408 Ryan Avenue South.
ACTION TAKEN:
Ms. DeLap had sent a letter to the Committee explaining her concern for
traffic patterns for ,westbound West 66th Street just past the intersection
of France Avenue. The concern is that vehicles in the left westbound lane
cross the intersection and then immediately try to negotiate into the
right lane to progress to northbound'Valley View Road. Her suggestion
was to place signs for westbound 66th Street traffic before the France
Avenue intersection stating that left lane traffic must proceed west
only and right lane traffic may proceed west or turn northbound onto
Valley View Road.
After review of the plans consulted during discussion of West 66th and
France Avenue area, it was felt that this item should be forwarded to City
Council for review before reconstruction phase begins.
Mr. Hughes moved to forward this concern to the City Council for review
and Possible public hearing before implementation of the reconstruction
Phase of West 66th Street and Valley View extension. Mrs. Fuhr seconded
the motion. Motion carried 3 -0.
EDINA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
i
0f750th &
FRANCE
hUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
P.O. Box 24122 Edina, Minnesota 55424
13 November 1990
Mayor Frederick S. Richards
Councilman Glenn Smith
Councilwoman Peggy Kelly
Councilman Bernard - G. Rice, Jr.
Councilwoman Jane Paulus
CITY OF EDINA / CITY HALL
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
[612]927 -8861
Re: THE 50TH & FRANCE DOWNTOWN EDINA BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL
ASSOCIATION Petition to the Edina City Council for a Temporary
Suspension of three (3) hour parking restrictions in the West 49 1/2
Street Ramp ( north ramp) and the West 51st /Halif ax Ramp ( south ramp )
during the Holiday Season
Dear Mr. Mayor and Council Members;
The Board of Directors of the 50th and France Business and Professional
Association formally requests that the three (3) hour parking restriction
which is currently being enforced in the North and South Ramps at 50th
and France be temporarily suspended for the Holiday Season, while the
Board generates a new and comprehensive Parking Plan for the 50th and
France area incorporating all of the current and near future available
parking.
This request is in response to what has become an urgent need to modify.
our current restrictive hours for our customers. Increasingly, the
Downtown Edina area is becoming a place where people wish to come to do
business and shop for a goodly portion of the day. The complaints to our
merchants and professional and to our Executive Director's Office in this
past year have compounded to the point that the Board of Directors feels
it must do something in the short term for the Holidays while generating
a master parking plan for the area which will keep the 50th and France
business community competitive with Southdale and Galleria and other like
areas, where parking hours are unrestricted.
We have* taken the liberty of attaching a letter from a customer who
fortunately took the time to write of her grievance instead of simply not
returning to shop in the area. This letter, Ladies and Gentlemen, is a
summation of our current dilemma. We as businessmen, need our customers;
however, if our customers are continually "inconvenienced" and put off by
restrictive parking, they will go elsewhere for their goods and services.
While the intent to turnover parking spaces during the,day has been upper
most in our minds through the years, the continual "bother" of time
checking destroys our customers desire to spend any length of time with
us. Our request for a temporary suspension in the three (3) hour parking
Mayor of the City of Edina and City Council Members
13 November 1990
,page two _
is, granted, an experiment, but also many be viewed as an appeasement to
our customers during the most hectic shopping season... one we hope will
restore some of the goodwill to our old customers who have found
themselves continually frustrated.
We wish to retain the one (1) hour parking areas for our older customers'
convenience and-for "quick trips". We also which to retain the two (2)
hour parking in the lot on the north side of West 49 1/2 Street and the
one (1) hour parking in the Clancy's lot. ;
The Board is aware that the employee parking situation will have to be
monitored even more closely should the Council grant our request, but
there are plane being prepared as we speak to deal with this aspect of
the situation.
"Convenience for our customers" and "competitiveness with other shopping
areas" are the foremost justifications for our proposal to this body. We
urgently request your serious consideration of our petition.
We, the Board of Directors thank you for your time and attention to.our
request. If you require additional information or if we may answer any
questions for you, please do not hesitate to. contact any one of us
through the,Association office or at our individual businesses.
Very Truly Yours,
l
The Board of Directors
50TH AND FRANCE DOWNTOWN EDINA
BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
[612]922 -1524
cc: Mayor Richards and the City Council Members
The Board of Directors' Files '90
Executive Director's Files '90
enclosures: Simensen Letter of'24 September 1990
Executive Director's Reply of 8 October 1990
' 0
I,
: /mss
_w,t;vt&
P�� Md WM �
3e
'- =
xl�e,
zecl
3
Xo,
tie �a�
ell
L"I a-
Y2 -Z
L
50th- &
FRANCE-'-.
BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
P.O. Box 24122 Edina, Minnesota 55424
8 October 1990
Betty Simensen
4920 Dona Lane
Golden Valley, MN 55422
Re: Parking Letter of 24 September 1990
Dear Ms. Simensen;
With reference to the above letter, may I take this opportunity to thank
you for following through with your complaint and contacting us. We need
to, know when our customers are being inconvenienced and when current
policies are causing hardships.
We have been made aware that more and more of our clientele is wishing to
spend the entire day in the area -as you did. This is an issue which is
currently- being "thrashed" over to come up with an equitable plan for our
customers, the powers that be at the Edina City Hall and the employees on
the corner.
As I hope I conveyed to you on the phone the other day, our first and
foremost concern is our customers. Without you all, we obviously would
not be in business. However, we do need to accommodate our employees who
work very hard f or. you and arrange for some kind of customer parking
turnover since we are unfortunately at a premium for same.
Please be assured Ms. Simensen, that we do take each and every complaint
very seriously and we are in the process of attempting to come up with
some major plan to assist our customers. With all of the interested
parties involved, we are sure that we will make someone unhappy, but it
will not be our customers.
Thank you again for taking the time to register your complaint instead of
just not coming back to "The Corner ". We of the 50th and France Business
and Professional Association do not wish to loose you as a customer, nor
do we wish to alienate any customer. We are trying to make improvements
all the time and will if folks like you take the time to let us know how
we can serve you better.
If you need any assistance in the future on the corner, please do not
hesitate to contact this office. We will be more than happy to help.
Very Truly Yours,
L. L. Emery Werth, Executive Director
50TH AND FRANCE DOWNTOWN EDINA
BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
(612)922 -1524
cc: Board of Directors' Files '90
Executive Director's Files '90
o ei
�� o
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: KENNETH ROSLAND
From: DAVID A VELDE
Date: NOVEMBER 13, 1990
Subject: POLICY ADDRESSSING
ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
V •
B
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
0
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
0
Discussion
Adopt a policy prohibiting coaches and chaperons from consuming
alcohol while traveling with City sponsored youth athletic events.
Info /Background
The Edina Community Health Services Advisory Committee adopted a
resolution at their November 8, 1990, meeting supporting the Edina
School districts Strategic Plan. In addition, the Edina Community
Health Services Advisory Committee recommends that the City of
Edina adopt a policy prohibiting the consumption of alcohol by
coaches and chaperons while traveling with City sponsored youth
athletic teams. The Committee believes that sanctions for failing
to comply with this policy should include seasonal, annual or total
suspension for the violators.
0
WHEREAS, the Edina Community Health Services Advisory Committee was
created to advise the Edina City Council on matters relating to the
health and well being of the community, and
WHEREAS, the Edina Community Heath Services Advisory Committee has
reviewed, studied and discussed the Strategic Plan adopted by the
Edina School District and endorses theogoals set forth in this
Strategic Plan, and
WHEREAS, the School district Strategic Plan incorporates a goal to
prohibit the consumption of alcohol by adult chaperons and coaches
while traveling with youth athletic teams in an effort to promote
positive role models for the youth of our community, and
WHEREAS, the Edina Community Health Services Advisory Committee
wholeheartedly endorses the ideal of promoting healthy lifestyles
by adults setting positive examples when in the presence of our
youth;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina Community Health Services
Advisory Committee that a recommendation be forwarded to the Edina
City Council to adopt a policy that all coaches and chaperons
traveling with youth athletic teams refrain from consuming alcohol
in any form while traveling with the team.
RS
f
Agenda Item V.0
r- - METRO RELATIONS INC.
October 1, 1990
Kenneth Rosland
City Manager
4801 50th St W
Edina MN15 424
Dear nd:
What is the most costly line item in many city budgets?
What public agency pays many of the highest wages and fringe
benefits in the metropolitan area?
What public agency gets 95 percent of its $120,000,000 operating
revenues from cities?
What public agency that serves cities exclusively has no direct
city voice in its affairs?
The answer to all of these questions is: the Metropolitan Waste
Control Commission.
The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) ranks right
behind the Metropolitan Transit Commission (MTC) with the second
largest budget of all the metropolitan agencies. Contrary to the
MTC, which receives its revenues from the fare box, the state
government, the federal government, as well as a tax within each
city, the MWCC gets 95 percent of its current $120,000,000 budget
from the cities. That means the cities must come tip with
$114,000,000. And there is no opting out!
The MWCC charges continue to grow. At a time when many cities
are forced to curtail some municipal services because of reduced
revenues, the cost of wastewater treatment is going tip at
historically unprecedented rates.
The MWCC is not subject to any budgetary constraints such as the
levy limit law imposed on cities. It can raise rates at will.
THE PROBLEM: No one speaks for the cities. There is no one
consistently and intensively watching the Commission and
advocating the interests of cities. There is no one consistently
doing analyses to assure that MWCC activities and expenditures
are necessary and in the interests of its users, the cities.
Stich lack of oversight has contributed to some known, and
probably many unknown, excessive expenditures in the past. For
example,)at the present time-many MWCC personnel and fringe
benefit costs far exceed comparable municipal personnel and
fringe benefit costs. Yet, it is the cities which pay these
costs. In addition, not only are these expenditures a direct
added cost through rate charges to cities, but a secondary cost
is that such practice complicates municipal labor negotiations.
5913 Chowen South • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55410 • (612) 926 -6201
TAE SOLUTION: Metro Relations, Inc. has been established to
provide an ongoing MWCC oversight, analysis and advocacy service
for your city and other cities. It.will assure the presence of
the interests of.cities at Commission discussions and
deliberations. It will provide analyses of Commission issues
from the municipal perspective, and will advocate, when
appropriate, the interests of your city and others with the
Commission.
No city can afford on its own to provide such service
consistently and in depth. But by joint action, an on -going
professional monitoring, analysis and advocacy service can be
provided for a very low individual municipal investment.
What are the BENEFITS? A major focus will be on keeping MWCC
budget increases to absolute necessary levels. Success in
keeping an MWCC budget increase down just 1 percent would save
the.cities over a million dollars in one year, and would multiply
many times over the small investment in Metro Relations, Inc.
For the first time your city and the other cities will have an
on -going professional presence with the Commission, someone who
knows the system and knows the process.
The investment in Metro Relations, Inc. is not competitive with
other general fund priorities, or such memberships as the
Association of Metropolitan Municipalities or the League of
Minnesota Cities. Because the focus of Metro Relations, Inc. is
exclusively on the MWCC, the city's subscription fee can, and
appropriately should, be a part of the municipal sewer service
enterprise budget.
To assure effective coordination Metro Relations Inc. will meet
regularly with the appropriate Board committee of the the
Association of Metropolitan Municipalities.
I will be the program's principal staff person. I have the
qualifications and capabilities to make the program work
effectively. I was Executive Director and Department Director
for the Metropolitan Council. I know well the operations of the
MWCC from these several years; of oversight responsibilities and
other more recent studies.
I also understand the needs and concerns of cities. This stems
from my term as_ Executive Director of the Association of
Metropolitan Municipalit`ies.—I know the system. I am skilled at
working in the' process. I will represent the participating
cities well.
Support for the service is on a subscription basis. Subscription
fees vary depending on the city's use of the wastewater system,
ranging from a low of $1250 to a high of $5850. Compare these
modest amounts to the charges you now pay to the MWCC.
Enclosed are a list of questions and answers and an agreement
to establish the city as a participating member. The agreement
also sets forth the amount of the city's annual investment as a
participating city.
I look forward to this opportunity of service to make your city
and others more effective in the metropolitan area.
I will be pleased to meet with you at any time to discuss the
proposal.
Sr"c re 1y,
Pc n a E. Franche
. .
EEF.tm
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
What is Metro Relations Inc.?
Metro Relations Inc. is a corporation established on behalf of
cities to monitor closely the activities of the Metropolitan
Waste Control Commission (MWCC), to analyze MWCC issues and to
advocate.the interests of participating cities with the MWCC.
Why is Metro Relations Inc. necessary?
The cities in this metropolitan area now pay well over
$10.0,000,000 each year,to the Metropolitan Waste Control
Commission, yet cities have -no direct voice in how or at what,
cost service' is to be provided. - Metro Relations Inc. will
conduct ongoing analyses of .MWCC issues on behalf of
participating cities, will be present at all Commission
deliberations, will communicate regularly on MWCC issues. with
participating cities, and will advocate the interests of
participating cities when appropriate.
Who decides what the Commission does?
It is the Commission which decides what the Commission does,
within the context of the broad policies laid down by the
Metropolitan Council. Commissioners are appointed by the
Metropolitan Council, which in turn is appointed by the Governor.
The Chair of the MWCC is also appointed by the Governor.
What will Metro Relations Inc. do for the participating cities?
Metro Relations Inc. will:
1. Represent the participating cities at Commission and
Committee meetings.
2.." Analyze key MWCC issues of importance to
;participating cities.
3. Analyze MWCC budgets and participate in the budget
- making process on behalf of the participating cities.
4. Advocate the interests of participating cities with
the MWCC.
5. Report regularly to the participating cities on key
MWCC issues.
i
6. Alert participating cities when issues before the
Commission warrant immediate attention and action.
Why is it necessary at this time to have cities represented with
the MWCC?
The costs of wastewater treatment are' going .tip at historically
unprecedented rates. Among other things, the ;MWCC now
compensates some of its employees at salaries, wages and .fringe
benefits which far exceed those of.cities. Cities pay these
costs through their rates and SAC charges. These costs have now
reached a level which warrants that the cities have a strong,
informed, regtilar and consistent professional presence with the
Commission, and keep themselves informed with ongoing analyses of
key MWCC issues so that appropriate action can be taken.
What will be the benefits?
Money! Among other things. Succeeding in keeping proposed MWCC.
increases down just 1 Percent will multiply many times over -the
cities,' small investment in Metro Relations Inc.
Also, for the first time in the history of the Commission, there
will be on -going analyses of MWCC issues and advocacy for the
cities interests at all Commission deliberations. No city can
afford to do this consistently on its own, yet it, becomes
extremely cost effective as a joint.effort.
How do we know Metro Relations Inc. will get results?
Success depends on the capabilities, track record and commitment
of the key person involved. The person committed to lead and
staff this program is a top tirban government professional with
over twenty years experience. He is known to many city managers
in the area with whom he has worked as a competent, capable and
effective professional of high integrity.
His background and experience have prepared him exceedingly well
to undertake the program. He-previously served as Executive
Director of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities and
Executive Director of the Metropolitan Council, and has conducted
his own government relations and planning firm for the past three
years..
2
Who is Gene Franchett?
Eugene E. Franchett is owner and president o -f Metro Relations,
Inc. He has directed his own firm of Gene Franchett and
Associates, doing planning and government relations, for the past
three years. His background is rich in government affairs
including:
Executive Director
Metropolitan Council
Department Director
Metropolitan Council
Executive Director
Association of Metropolitan Municipalities
Executive Director
Governor's Task Force on Metropolitan Problems (Wisc.)
Executive Director
Fox Valley Council of Governments (Wisc.)
He' has written national award winning reports. He was named
outstanding regional council executive director in the country in
1983 and outstanding public administrator in Minnesota.'
3
AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT made this day of 1990 between the
city of , Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as
the "City ", and' Metro Relations Inc., hereinafter referred to as
"MRI„
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, it is in the interest of the city to engage the services
of. MRI to monitor on behalf of the city. the operations and
activities of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission,
hereinafter referred to as "MWCC", to conduct research and
analyses of MWCC matters, and to undertake related activities,
and
WHEREAS, it is in the interest of the city to share the cost' of
such monitoring and analyses with other cities of like interests
who shall also contract with MRI for this same purpose, and
WHEREAS, MRI and its principal agent, Eugene E. Franchett,.is
particularly knowledgeable and competent to conduct such
monitoring and analyses
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows
AGREEMENT
A. Character and Extent of Services
1. MRI agrees to provide services as follows:
a. To be present on behalf of the city and the other
participating cities a -t MWCC commission meetings and
committee meetings.
b. To analyze key MWCC issues of importance. to the city
and_ the other participating cities.
c. To analyze MWCC budgets and participate in the.budget-
making process on behalf of the city and the other
participating cities and make recommendations on behalf of
the participating cities.
1
d. To advocate the interests of the city in common with
the other participating,cities with the MWCC.
e. To notify within a reasonable time the chief
administrative officer of the ci "ty and the other
participating cities when .MRI determines that issues before
the commission warrant immediate attention and action.
f. To report in writing regularly to the city and the
other participating cities on .key MWCC issues.
.B. Compensation
1. The services performed by MRI shall be paid by annual
subscriptions by each participating municipality. The amount
of each city's subscription shall. vary from $12"50 to $5850 per
year depending on the extent of the city's use of the regional
waste water treatment system. Within these parameters the
annual subscription fee shall be approximately 0.2% of the
MWCC estimated gross charge to the city for current costs for
interceptor and treatment works (.002 x current costs). The
subscription fee for the city in 1991 is�j 7� 0, ° -'- Such
subscription fee shall be paid by the city as follows: One -half
on or before February 1 of each year and one -half on or before
August 1 of each year.
C. Duration and Termination
1. This agreement is made contingent, upon the execution of
like contracts by not less than seven cities, and upon meeting
that contingency MRI shall give written notice of, the
effectiveness of the contract to each city.
2. This agreement shall be in effect for one year commencing
January 1, 1991 and ending December 31, 1991, HOWEVER it shall
renew automatically each subsequent year unless Notice of
Termination shall be given pursuant to Paragraph (a) following.
a. Either the city or MRI may terminate this agreement by
giving the other party written notice on or before October 1
of any year giving notice of termination at the end of that
calendar year; and the agreement shall continue until the
effective date of such termination. A notice of termination
may be rescinded by either party at any time.
c. This agreement shall be terminated at the end of the
calendar year when the number of participating'municipalities
is reduced to less than the number of participating
municipalities required to put the agreement into effect.
2
D. Miscellaneous
1. Execution of this Agreement does not create a contract of
employment.' MRI and Eugene E. Franchett are and shall remain
independent contractors, therefore the city shall not be
responsible for payment of social security or withholding
taxes, nor for unemployment or worker's compensation insurance
or other benefits.
2. If the city resolves to retain MRI to. pursue a matter of
special interest with the MWCC it may do so provided the matter
is not in conflict with the interests of the other
participating cities, and MRI shall receive an additional fee
for such services which shall be based on its standard per diem
fees.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement the
day and year firs_..above written.
Metro elati s Inc.
By: f%
Its Pre d
ient
Date OG% y3F�
3
City
By,:
Its
Date
5701 NORMANDALE ROAD, EDINA. MINNESOTA 55424
PHONE 612;922 -0676'
November 8, 1990
Mayor-and Council Members
City of Edina
/: -801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Agenda Item V.D
The Minnesota Legislature, in its 1990 session, passed
legislation enabling municipalities to, by ordinance, authorize
the holder of an on -sale wine license to sell 3.2 beer, and whose
total sales are at least 60 percent attributable to the sale of
food, to sell strong beer at on -sale without an additional
license (340a .404 Subd. 5. (b)).
After consideration and discussion,'the board of directors of the
Edina Chamber of Commerce has concluded that the passage of an
ordinance for the City of Edina authorizing the sale of strong
beer in a manner consistent with the existing• ordinances
regulating the sale of on -sale wine would be beneficial to the
business environment of the city, which in turn, would serve the
general best interests of the city -as a whole.
The board's opinion is based, in part, on the positive effect the
wine licensing established -in 1985 has had on business
development, specifically in maintaining and attracting high
quality restaurants to the community, and the belief that the
sale of beer under the existing ordinance would enhance further
similar business development without negative effects. The
primary benefit would be the attraction of restaurants for which
sale of imported beers is considered as important to business
development as the sale of wines. Generally, imported beers have
alcohol content ranging to about 6 percent, which is, greater
than the 3.2 percent maximum required to qualify as a
nonintoxicating beverage, but less than the 6 to 14 percent
typical of wines.
Such an ordinance would be generally c,onsistant. with the public
attitude expressed in the informal referendum held prior to the
passage of the wine ordinance, since the sale of beer would be
based on the same criteria as established at that time, and since
the, consumption of beer in conjunction with dining is generally
considered similar.in character to the sale of wine.,Finally, the
availability of 3.2 beer has been longstanding in the city and is
therefore generally accepted.
After reaching this conclusion, the Board of Directors of the
Chamber of Commerce passed a resolution supporting the addition
of strong beer to the wine licensing ordinance as provided by
Minnesota law, and hereby requests that the City Council consider
and pass an enabling ordinance to that effect.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Marsh Everson
President-
n,
o
�
�. 9p, ay/ REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: KENNETH ROSLAND
Agenda Item #
-11 E.
From: CRAIG LARSEN
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Date: NOVEMBER 19, 1990
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject: TAX FORFEIT LAND
❑
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
1. Acquire parcel A for open space.
2. Sell Parcels B and C to adjacent property owners.
Info /Background
Parcel A is located adjacent to our existing ponding and open space
in the Dewey Hill neighborhood. Public ownership of the parcel is
desirable.
Parcel B is a small (30 feet by 20 feet) portion of a private alley
serving homes on Doncaster Way and Lobhloy Drive. There appears to
be no public purpose for acquisition of this parcel.
Parcel C is a narrow strip of land (11 1/2 feet) between 3205 and
3219 West 6'Oth Street. We do not know how or why this parcel was
created. There are no public utilities or public uses of the
property.
- - - ,.�; -- • �„ 1. �. ti�� .���•.r- Y..�- •:�.�'•!'1J4?��i� i� PVC. :'y�,._�����f
10D 0 100. 400 `-
:�' ate*
scale
feet
- _ 24)EWEY_ X89•
z{s1Q , .• �� / ,�• ,:� J9al *, � , - {o'�Sy�j ,W '►� �09'gb�T
CA ° `{ /'� .l A1°�y p �' 'e� t Ste• *'ls �,c A 33ti� .•..v>Jr �� �(�G
�+s 1
sur �'� , GONE 4% Q� YO,�' 2 \000
oN
� t ° OO / � p► `�
Q �
/�7 � 0. �•ti~ jlj.l� 111./4 1 �� ��`
36
1AJ V ' V� • 3 P Ki
Q -�• •�i!Iti V� _ i! •���I� { 5�,� 1�• 9
w.r �2
-OS r, r *z 38�' SI 396, !i
1
L. •jo'o4" -;f7 0 A 44 (�% 589036
j* `�T it
OrSYfY /1 A./N49 O 29 1 1 0
a
i 16
I 09
•3r,_ �, : r 23 3 1211 m
•S!
ITS 1) 3 15
e
=�� r • G�. �� L' w ti I ^ 61.0 1
A.AOOM 3501
IV
a :�`Z `„�. - °JIG. �•� i 24 17 7 6 5 4 3
•! w ilt. ! 7I.L4 L 4.7
_ a •9 ps, •9 M/ / �
Ex Q ?Z y r s� O o �—
'�i �s. wN
I's 10
P DSO ,t °' ' woo O 4
N d
•
17 ,36'2a "W
°
a6. ti • ' � QO q • �' � I
a�1
41V ON
l7V ` \ r o• o °� pt V
a3 'bla . 575.5 v ° •;
m° Li9.97 0 .1V99'18'S6•'E 397 j •t1 �gJ�
av•4j "4 7 h••- -
_ — — 33•. 4 � s
t
54 NCA51
!: ► :J 19 ' •.S C• 4444:1/ 1 r.. .� 1• „dam!
�ONCE��.WA ` S4 'ot .oH 4d /•044:1, t. 4 '14% � ,� SV•
A �( `
b 'j`'' �, R1y EN_014 HL' N =� ~ 2nd A DDI NON y
o•Y
VICT' SEN' A0�0�T_ �; N '�J
�g �. „< w
T0= ED/ A o,. H /G7yNOS
13e.o 1 5 21 •.� ]l•t, 7.f ,1 �— no
Jbi
Pj
h; �t ei ° 1 _ 319 a • ��
z L7CNLOY " DR ,.
W
-EDINA. JW
J
t .. '- J•� '�.L r Iid W 1 4 R •� ••tit • A 44
.rd�.�.'% -- � � ' - - ; ' ` � ,•^ it ,. � � I .• ! `� n ��. �.•..
�^ — a
CXp
4
z
n DUNCRAIG D
R
— ` • . y
'Vl 30 ° kh;
. I I =12 . 'pay.
1 114.1 u1 - C_n #AW S ✓ o N
14
3030 ^ 30 30 141 Do
°' vV# - i.li •.3S I ... !s b
P 1 I 134 d;&—' L7
.► 3 3 3 3� 4 *oKE;p `p 1t}1 ' li Z �tao 1I t
go. 1 F o9 �r�
�• 1 r � `�: 4 4 I
D s (5610 i
28 � rs 10
1
6 :' j•
(Sb
�
6 r. 30 y
e - 92,
7 ^-- 6, 7 I K�
�3
i34. :
fz
° 16x01
l0
3r-,, N 7 =bl
k, • 4 e+ 0 24
6
.t. ° ► ✓aq II ^ 22'�
_ s
�51 12 C 3 �, ✓ 3g
Ri 21 ^ 12 c� 4 61 I (_l -
r 6 1 _ OW AL DINA
2
r�
0 -+ ' *a✓
'••—
14S- �' 19 14 I� m 60 (3265 l
15� r c H DE 'g (4205 _° P;
31
eu 1e� o o
}z 9 N �, +. t�r AD (4430
[i'
vi �/ 0 0 ajG 16'A 91.16 „d o 11 Gd 9 r=
/.10141 o4' w IG
1636.09 Rcs °.....
• _ ..fL.. .... .• C '• � mil. G. i r-!.•, 1 °' {!�°• .. I. � ^ t^• r 7 +' r•
Oy ,:f
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that the City Attorney
be authorized and directed to file "Application by Governmental Subdivision For
Conveyance of Tax Forfeited Lands ", for the following described property contained
in Hennepin County Auditor's List "760 -NC ", said property to be used by the City
as hereafter set forth:
PIN 08- 116 -21 -42 -0216 - Open space
ADOPTED this 19th day of November, 1990.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of
the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of
November 19, 1990, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 4th day of December, 1990.
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has received from the County of
Hennepin a list of lands in said municipality which became the property of the
State of Minnesota for non - payment of property taxes, which said list was received
on 11/07/90, Non - Conservation List 760 -NC; and
WHEREAS, the parcels in said list identified as PIN Nos. 29- 117 -21 -43 -0047 and
20- 028 -24 -34 -0002 have heretofore been classified by the Board of County
Commissioners of Hennepin County, Minnesota as non - conservation land and the sale
thereof has heretofore been authorized by said Board of County Commissioners;
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the Edina City Council that there are no
existing or pending special assessments on said parcels;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the said
classification is hereby approved;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that, acting pursuant to
Minnesota Statute 282.01, it has determined that said parcels of land are not
buildable according to the City's Zoning Ordinance because of minimum area and
that sale of said parcels be limited to abutting property owners for attachment
thereto.
ADOPTED this 19th day of November, 1990.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do
hereby certify that.the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct
copy'of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular
Meeting of November 19, 1990 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular
Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 4th day of December, 1990.
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
\
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that the City Attorney
be authorized and directed to file "Application by Governmental Subdivision For
Conveyance of Tax Forfeited Lands ", for the following described property contained
in Hennepin County Auditor's List "760 -NC ", said property to be used by the City
as hereafter set forth:
PIN 08- 116 -21 -42 -0216 - Open space.
ADOPTED this 19th day of November, 1990.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of
the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of
November 19, 1990, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 4th day of December, 1990.
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
o e Cn�
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
ECOMMENDATION
J J•
v'
To: KEN ROSLAND
From: RALPH JOHNSON
Date: NOVEMBER 15, 1990
Subject: SET BOARD OF REVIEW DATE.
Agenda Item #
•F
Consent
0
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
❑
To Council
Action
x❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
Recommendation: APRIL 22, 1991, 5:00 P.M.
Info /Background: THE BOARD OF REVIEW HAS A 20 DAY PERIOD TO CONCLUDE
ITS BUSINESS PRIOR TO MAY 31. APRIL 22 IS THE FOURTH MONDAY OF THE MONTH AND
APPEARS TO BE AN OPEN DATE FOR THE COUNCIL. PREVIOUS DATES WERE 4/24/89 AND
4/23/90.
otLe
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
• fN�APOMt�v
leas
To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER
From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK
Date: NOVEMBER 15, 1990
Subject: 1991 COUNCIL MEETING
DATES
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # V.G
Consent 0
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
0
To Council
Action 0
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Approval of the Council Meeting Schedule for 1991 as presented.
Info /Background
In determining Council meeting dates for 1991, I find that in the months of
January, February and September the regular Council meeting falls on a
holiday. I would recommend we follow the pattern established during the last
two years as follows:
In a month when the regular meeting falls on a holiday and there are five
Mondays in the month, the Council meetings were held on the second and fourth
Mondays. In a month with four Mondays, the Council meeting was moved to the
following Tuesday if the Monday was a holiday. That would result in the
following Council meeting schedule for 1991:°
January - Monday, January 7 (first Monday) and Tuesday, January 22
(Monday, January 21 is Martin Luther King Day)
February - Monday, February 4 (first I,tonday) and Tuesday, February 19
(Monday, February 18 is-Presidents Day)
September - Monday, September 9 and Monday, September 23 (2nd and 4th Monday)
(Monday, September 2 is Labor Day; five Mondays in month)
(MUNICIPAL
LEGISI..ATNE
COMMISSION
* NOTICE *
Agenda Item VIII.B
1500 Northland Plaza
3800 West 80th-Street
Bloomington. Minnesota 55431
(612) 893 -6650
THE MLC WILL HOST A BREAKFAST MEETING
7:30 a.m., WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 5, 1990
DECATHLON ATHLETIC CLUB, BLOOMINGTON.
The purpose of this meeting is to welcome all of
the following NEWLY ELECTED legislators who will
be representing MLC cities:
RON ERHARDT District 42B
CHARLES HALBERG District 38
JEFF HANSON District 56A
PAUL HUFNAGLE District 41A
PHIL KRINKIE District 53A
PEGGY LEPPIK District 45B
TED MONDALE District 44
DENNIS NEWINSKI a District 54B
PHIL RIVENESS District 40
JUDY TRAUB District 45
Please notify all of your mayors and councilmembers.
i
RSVP TO HEATHER FLORINE
893 -6674
BY FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 29, 1990
Member Cities: Bloomington, Brooklyn Park, Burnsville. Eagan.
Eden Prairie. Edina. InverlGrove Heights, Maple Grove. Maplewood. Minnetonka,
Plymouth. Roseville. Shoreview, White Bear Lake. Woodbury
CHECK
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
303630
11/05/90
ITEM DESCRIPTION
322A54
11/05/90
322A54
11/05/90
322A54
11/05/90
322A54
11/05/90
322A54
11/05/90
* * * * **
323701
11/05/90
323702
11/05/90
323703
11/05/90
323704
11/05/90
323705
11/05/90
323705
11/05/90
323705
11/05/90
323706
11/05/90
323707
11/05/90
323708
11/05/90
323709
11/05/90
323710
11/05/90
323711
11/05/90
323712
11/05/90
323713
11/05/90
323714
11/05/90
CHECK
REGISTER
11 -19 -90 PAGE 1
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
# MESSAGE
41.00
BERTELSON BROS.
INC.
3 RING BINDERS
10- 4516 - 600 -60
614583
41.00
* ** -CKS
67.15
AAGARD
CARDBOARD RECYCLING
10- 4250 - 540 -54
36.75
AAGARD
CARDBOARD RECYCLING
50- 4250 - 821 -82
36.75
AAGARD
CARDBOARD RECYCLING
50- 4250- 841 -84
39.75-
AAGARD
CARDBOARD RECYCLING
50- 4250 - 861 -86
36.75
AAGARD
CARDBOARD RECYCLING
50- 4250 - 861 -86
137.65 *
* ** -CKS
1.00
DAGMAR ANDERSON
AMBULANCE REFUND
10- 3180 - 000 -00
1.00 *
100.00
PAT GREER
OCT EXHIBIT FEE
30- 3501 - 000 -00
100.00 *
63.12
LITIN PAPER CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
23- 4504 - 613 -61
A58551
1544
63.12 *
433.99
MICHAEL SNYDER
UNIFORM ALLWANCE
10- 4266 - 420 -42
433.99 *
2.32
AUTO WHSL WEST
INC
SEAL
10- 4540 - 560 -56
36948
1428
104.52
AUTO WHSL WEST
INC
SEAL /SNAP RING
10- 4540 - 560 -56
38059
1409
9.10
AUTO WHSL WEST
INC
SPRAY
10- 4540- 560 -56
38066
1409
115.94 *
50.30
A M LEONARD INC
SAW
10- 4580- 646 -64
114227
1165
50.30 *
374.45
MN EQUIPMENT CO
SANDBLAST KIT
40- 4580 - 801 -80
4761
1400
374.45 *
33.83
KENT MOORE TOOL
GRO
HYDROMETER FLOAT
10- 4580 - 560 -56
558105
1290
33.83 *
240.00
TREES INC
TREE TRANSPLANT
27- 4288 - 664 -66
1119
240.00 *
35.00
METRO LEGAL SERVICES
ABSTRACT SEARCH
11- 4201 - 127 -12
1457
35.00 *
500.00
LYNN HALONEN
TREE PRUNING
30- 4504 - 782 -78
500.00 *
100.00
MIKAEL RUDOLPH
PERFORMANCE 2/19/91
30- 4224 - 781 -78
100.00 *
6,315.00
GAGNON INC
INSULATION
10- 4201 - 500 -50
10889
9880
6,315.00 *
i
145.66
HARMON GLASS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
9956
990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
11 -19 -90 PAGE 2
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
# MESSAGE
145.66 *
23715
11/05/90
307.01
SUSAN FRAME
COST /GOODS SOLD
23- 4624 - 613 -61
916449
1542
307.01 *
23 16
11/05/90
64.50
EAGLE ELEVATOR CORP
ELEVATOR REPAIR
10- 4248 - 520 -52
1303
23 16
11/05/90
287.00
EAGLE ELEVATOR CORP
ELEVATOR REPAIR
10- 4248 - 520 -52
1156
1628
23716
11/05/90
130.14
EAGLE ELEVATOR CORP
ELEVATOR REPAIR
10- 4248 - 520 -52
1157
1628
481.64* -Hh- r4 *
23717
11/05/90
338.87
MN UC FUND
UNEMPLOYMENT
10- 4160 - 510 -51
338.87 *
23718
11/05/90
3,573.00
SHHSC
HUMAN SERVICES
10- 4201 - 508 -50
3,573.00 *
9875
29949
23719
if/85/98
11/05/90
64.58
7'
FAST FRAME
FAST FRAME
MA!NfENEeEANeE
ART CENTER /FRAME
ie-4248 520 52
10- 4504- 627 -62
±909
276264
73.95 *
23720
11/05/90
750.00
KAEDING & ASSO INC
PRO SERVICES
10- 4201 - 420 -42
1620'
23720
11/09/90
750.00
KAEDING & ASSO INC
EQUIP REPLACE
10- 4901 - 420 -42-
1620
1,500.00 *
23721
11/05/90
60.00
PHP
AMBULANCE REFUND
10- 3180 - 000 -00
60.00 *
23722
11/05/90
617.00
ANDERBERG -LUND
PRINTING
30- 4600 - 781 -78
037431
1677
617.00 *
* * * **
* * * -CKS
23724
11/05/90
12.95
INDEPENDENT LIVING
MAGNIFIERS
10- 4504 - 180 -18
033958
1029
12.95 *
23725
11/05/90
1,495.00
EEC ODOR NEUTRALIZER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
40- 4504 - 801 -80
0501
1572
1,495.00 *
23726
11/07/90
2.81
REBEKAH WIESE
MILEAGE
40- 4208 - 806 -80
2.81 *
23727
11/07/90
48.00
METRO COUNCIL
AIR PHOTOS
10- 4502 - 140 -14
48.00 *
23728
11/07/90
50.98
NORTHLAND AIT FILTER
CLEANING SUPPLIES
30- 4512 - 782 -78
15646
1216
50.98 *
23729
11/07/90
30.00
LISA FINSNESS
REFUND
30- 3505 - 000 -00
30.00 *
23730
11/07/90
306.54
MICHAUD COOLEY
ENG SERV
30- 4201 - 781 -78
24279
306.54 *
23731
11/07/90
131.35
JAY BRASK
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
10- 4266 - 420 -42
131.35 *
23732
11/07/90
5,251.00
MILLS ADVERTISING
MAG EXP
12- 4215- 434 -43
z
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
323733
323733
323733
323734
323734
323735
323736
323737
323738
323739
323740
323741
323742
323743
323744
323745
323746
323747
323748
323749
11/07/90
11/07/90
11/07/90
11/07/90
11/07/90
11/07/90
11/07/90
11/08/90
11/08/90
11/08/90
11/08/90
11/08/90
11/08/90
11/08/90
11/08/90
11/08/90
11/08/90
11/08/90
11/08/90
11/08/90
AMOUNT
5,251.00 *
20.00
20.00
20.00
60.00 *
3,339.50
61.50
3,401.00 *
46.50
46.50 *
61.33
61.33 *
195.50
195.50 *
86.21
86.21 *
437.40
437.40 *
30.20
30.20 *
167.00
167.00 *
1,650.00
1,650.00 *
43.72
43.72 *
50.00
50.00 *
50.00
50.00 *
100.00
100.00 *
25.00
25.00 *
45.00
45.00 *
45.00
45.00 *
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
CHEQUE OF MN INC
CHEQUE OF MN INC
CHEQUE OF MN INC
MN STATE
MN STATE
DAVID BLOOD
ECONOMIC PRESS
CONT CLAY CO
BLOOMINGTON CERAMICS
GTE SUN COMMUNITY
MN TRUCKING ASSOC
MN PETRO SERV INC
DEVITT CO INC
CYBEX
ROYAL SIL -O -ETS
PAT FUHR
CAROL MCCORMICK
HELEN ZABEL
ADRIANE BRUMFIELD
806 CONNOLLY
ANNUAL FEE
ANNUAL FEE
ANNUAL FEE
STATE SURCHARGE
STATE SURCHARGE
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
RENEWAL
COST /GOODS SOLD
CRAFT SUPPLIES
ADVERTISING
GENERAL SUPPLIES
REPAIR PARTS
ADVERTISING
REPAIR PARTS
PERFORMACE 11/23/90
PERFORMANCE 11/10/90
PERFORMANCEI /10/91
DEC 8TH PROGRAM
DEC 16TH PROGRAM
DEC 16TH•PR0GRAM
11 -19 -90 PAGE 3
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
50- 4201 - 820 -82 10833
50- 4201 - 840 -84 10834
50- 4201 - 860 -86 10835
10- 3095 - 490 -49
10- 3113 - 490 -49
10- 4266 - 420 -42
10- 4204 - 440 -44
23- 4624 - 613 -61 001192 1374
23- 4588 - 611 -61 1663 1203
23- 4214 - 611 -61
10- 4504 - 560 -56 11938 1423
10- 4540 - 540 -54 25964 1580
30- 4214 - 781 -78 1552
30- 4540 - 782 -78 283915 1519
30 -4224- 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
323750
11/08/90
50.00
MARILYN HALL
DEC 20TH PROGRAM
`
50.00
*
323751
11/08/90
25.00
JANE KANJANAVAVITCH
DEC 23RD PROGRAM
25.00
*
323752
11/08/90
25.00
BILL DIETRICHSON
DEC 30TH PROGRAM
25.00
*
323753
11/08/90
25.00
EVIE HOLMQUIST
1/3/91 PROGRAM
25.00
*
.'323754
11/08/90
25.00
AGNES FINE
1/10/91 PROGRAM
25.00
*
323755
11/08/90
25.00
HELEN ZABEL
1/12/91 VA PROGRAM
25.00
*
323756
11/08/90
25.00
BOB CONNOLLY
1/21/91 VA PROGRAM
25.00
*
323757
11/08/90
25.00
MARIAN ALSTAD
1/22/91 VA PROGRAM
25.00
*
323758
11/08/90
25.00
ADRIANE BRUMFIELD
1/31/91 VA PROGRAM
25.00
*
323759
11/08/90
60.00
ISFSI
DUES
60.00
*
323760
11/08/90
47.50
WALDEN BROS LUMBER
LUMBER
47.50
*
323761
11/08/90
92.28
BUDGET LIGHTING
REPAIRS
92.28
*
323762
11/08/90
225.00
ISIA
DUES
225.00
*
323763
11/08/90
155.00
GCSAA
SCHOOL
155.00
*
323764
11/09/90
277,704.76
ELECTRIC SERVICE CO
PAYMENT
277,704.76
*
323765
11/09/90
6,133.68
DMJ CORP
PAYMANT
6,133.68
*
323766
11/09/90
580.08
AMERIDATA
PRO SERVICE
580.08
*
323767
11/09/90
120.00
CSC CREDIT SERV INC
DUES
120.00
*
323768
11/09/90
150.00
BUREAU OF CRIMINAL
TELETYPE
t'
11 -19 -90 PAGE
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
10- 4204 - 440 -44
10- 4604- 644 -64 7325 1322
28- 4248 - 702 -70 18167 1131
28- 4204 - 701 -70 026885
27- 4202 - 661 -66
60- 2040 - 000 -00 90 -10
60- 2040 - 000 -00 90 -11
10- 4201 - 460 -46 247607
10- 4204 - 420 -42
10- 4268 - 420 -42
4
11 -19 -90 PAGE
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4268 - 420 -42 90Q316
10- 4202 - 420 -42
10- 4502 - 420 -42 871409
10- 4901 - 420 -42 4066 1311
10- 4901 - 420 -Q2 134985 1236
40- 4204 - 803 -80
10- 4901 - 420 -42 1235,
60- 2040 - 000 -00 90 -9
30- 4201 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4201 - 782 -78
10- 3500 - 000 -00
10- 3500 - 000 -00
10- 3500 - 000 -00
10- 3500 - 000 -00
10- 4310 - 840 -84
10- 4504 - 510 -51 32921 1629
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
5
e
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
323768
11/09/90
180.00
BUREAU OF CRIMINAL
TELETYPE
330.00
*
323769
11/09/90
45.00
MIJJ
TRAINING
45.00
*
323770
11/09/90
38.05
CALLAGHAN & CO
BOOKS
38.05
*
323771
11/09/90
567.00
ALEXANDER BATTERY N
EQUIPMENT REPLACE
567.00
*
323772
11/09/90
793.23
OLSON GRAPHIC PROD
EQUIP REPLACE
793.23
*
323773
11/09/90
69.00
AWWA
MEMBERSHIP
69.00
*
323774
11/09/90
584.90
SIRCHIE
EQUIP REPLACE
584.90
*
323775
11/09/90
30,998.04
NORTHWST ASPHALT INC
PAYMENT
30,998.04
*
323776
11/13/90
766.48
PAT GREER
SERVICES 12 -90
766.48
*
323777
11/13/90
600.00
ESPECIALLY FOR
RENTAL
600.00
*
323778
11/13/90
380.00
C WAYNE COURTNEY
SERVICES
380.00
*
323779
11/13/90
120.00
MN DEPT OF NATL
FIREARM SAFETY
120.00
*
323.780
11/13/90
125.00
MN DEPT OF NATL
FIREARM SAFETY
125.00
*
323781
11/13/90
125.00
MN DEPT OF NATL
FIREARM SAFETY
125.00
*
323782
11/13/90
100.00
MN DEPT OF NATL
FIREARM SAFETY
1U0.00
*
323783
11/13/90
12.00
MN DEPT OF
RETAILERS CARD
12.00
*
323784
11/13/90
366.08
FAX NETWORKS
FAX PAPER
366.08
*
323785
11/13/90
168.00
PHYLLIS HAYWA
AC INSTRUCTOR
168.00
*
323786
11/13/90
134.00
TARA CARMICHAEL
AC INSTRUCTOR
11 -19 -90 PAGE
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4268 - 420 -42 90Q316
10- 4202 - 420 -42
10- 4502 - 420 -42 871409
10- 4901 - 420 -42 4066 1311
10- 4901 - 420 -Q2 134985 1236
40- 4204 - 803 -80
10- 4901 - 420 -42 1235,
60- 2040 - 000 -00 90 -9
30- 4201 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4201 - 782 -78
10- 3500 - 000 -00
10- 3500 - 000 -00
10- 3500 - 000 -00
10- 3500 - 000 -00
10- 4310 - 840 -84
10- 4504 - 510 -51 32921 1629
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
5
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
11/1'3/90
11/13/90
11/13/90
11/13/90
11/13/90
11/13/90
11/13/90
11/13/90
11/13/90
11/13/90
11/13/90
11/13/90
11/13/90
11/13/90
11/13/90
11/13/90
11/13/90
11/13/90
11/13/90
11/13/90
AMOUNT
134.00
450.00
450.00 *
535.00
535.00 *
83.00
83.00 *
28.00
28.00 *
180.00
180.00 *
360.00
360.00 *
180.00
180.00 *
168.00
168.00 *
192.00
192.00 *
30.00
168.00
198.00 *
168.00
168.00 *
540.00
540.00 *
90.00
90.00 *
838.00
838.00 *
221.50
221.50 *
340.00
522.50
862.50 *
408.00
408.00 *
162.00
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
PAT GEISHEKER
BRADLEY BENN
ADRIANE BRUMFIELD
SUZIE KELM
NICK LEGEROS
SUSAN FRAME
MELANIE GADEN
CYD WICKER
DOROTHY ODLAND
BETSY BRYANT
BETSY BRYANT
PHYLLIS PETERSON
JEAN GRAPP
BOB CONNOLLY
MARIAN ALSTAD
MARGARET GUST
MONICA RUDQUIST
MONICA RUDQUIST
BILL DIETRICHSON
TOBIE DICKER
AC INSTRUCTOR
AC RENNOVATION
AC INSTRUCTOR'
AC INSTRUCTOR
AC INSTRUCTOR
AC INSTRUCTOR
PT MAINT AC
AC INSTRUCTOR
AC INSTRUCTOR
PT MAINT AC
AC INSTRUCTOR
AC INSTRUCTOR
AC INSTRUCTOR
AC INSTRUCTOR
AC INSTRUCTOR
AC INSTRUCTOR
PT MAINT AC
AC INSTRUCTOR
AC INSTRUCTOR
PT MAINT AC
11-19 -90 PAGE 6
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
23- 4201 - 611 -61
25- 4942 - 001 -23
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201- 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4120 - 612 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4120 - 612 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4120 - 612 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4120 - 612 -61
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
323804
11/13/90
745.00
TOBIE DICKER
AC INSTRUCTOR
10- 4208 - 180 -18
907.00
*
10- 4208 - 180 -18
323805
11/13/90
225.00
HARRY HEIM
AC INSTRUCTOR
10- 4208 - 180 -18
225.00
*
10- 4208 - 180 -18
323806
11/13/90
115.92
JAMES E ROBINSON
MEETING EXP
27- 4516 - 661 -66
66631 1783
115.92
*
27- 4516 - 661 -66
323807
11/13/90
252.00
KATHLEEN SCHNEIDER
AMBULANCE REFUND
30- 4504 - 783 -78
252.00
*
323808
11/13/90
100.00
EDINA POLOCE
SERVICES
100.00
*
323809
11/13/90
473.51
HOWARD NORBACK
TECH SERVICES
323809
11/13/90
43.86
HOWARD NORBACK
MILEAGE
517.37
*
323810
11/13/90
189.83
RICHARD HERKEL
ELECTION SERVICES
323810
11/13/90
13.26
RICHARD HERKEL
MILEAGE
203.09
*
323811
11/13/90
1,318.59
FLORENCE NORBACK
ELECTION SERVICES
323811
11/13/90
14.28
FLORENCE NORBACK
MILEAGE
1,332.87
*
323812
11/13/90
3.57
BARBARA HERBERS
MILEAGE
3.57
*
323813
11/13/90
5.10
HELEN PETERSON
MILEAGE
5.10
*
323814
11/13/90
3.57
CAROL MCPHEETERS
MILEAGE
3.57
*
323815
11/13/90
100.00
EXPLORERS POST 925
ELECTION SERVICES
100.00
*
323816
11/13/90
320.00
JOHNSON WROUGHT IRON
CONSTRUCTION
320.00
*
323817
11/13/90
107.70
IDENTIFICATION SERV
MANE TAGS
323817
11/13/90
107.70
IDENTIFICATION SERV
NAME TAGS
323817
11/13/90
107.70-
IDENTIFICATION SERV
MANE TAGS
107.70
*
323818
11/13/90
23.00
IDELLES INTER DESIGN
REPAIRS
323818
11/13/90
468.00
IDELLES INTER DESIGN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
491.00
*
323819
11/13/90
200.00
DAVE GUSTAFSON
GENERAL SUPPLIES
200.00
*
323820
11/13/90
23.79
CINDY WAKNITZ
MILEAGE
7
11 -19 -90 PAGE
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
10- 4206 - 440 -44
10- 3180 - 000 -00
10- 4201 - 180 -18
10- 4201 - 180 -18
10- 4208 - 180 -18
10- 4201 - 180 -18
10- 4208 - 180 -18
10- 4201 - 180 -18
10- 4208 - 180 -18
10- 4208 - 180 -18
10- 4208 - 180 -18
10- 4208 - 180 -18
10- 4201 - 180 -18
27- 1300 - 005 -00
27- 4516 - 661 -66
66631 1783
27- 4516 - 661 -66
66631 1783
27- 4516 - 661 -66
66631 1783
30- 4248 - 783 -78
30- 4504 - 783 -78
30- 4504 - 783 -78
30- 4208 - 781 -78
7
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
11/19/90
11/13/90
11/13/90
11/13/90
11/13/90
11/13/90
11/13/90
11/13/90
11/13/90
11/13/90
11/13/90
11/13/90
11/13/90
11/13/90
11/13/90
11/13/90
11/13/90
AMOUNT
23.79 *
75.00
75.00 *
35.00
35.00 *
185.00
185.00 *
425.90
425.90 *
132.60
132.60 *
15.30
15.30 *
950.00
950.00 *
19,204.80
19,204.80 *
465.00
465.00 *
1,672.88
1,672.88 *
91.41
91.41 *
37.66
37.66 *
24.28
24.28 *
29.81
29.81 *
5.00
5.00 *
50.49
50.49 *
15.51
15.51 *
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
INDRANI MALLICK
SHIRLEY OLSON
PUBLIC RISK MGMT
ARNOLD ALBEN INC
ESSCO CARPETS
CF ANDERSON CO
DELANO ERICKSON ARCH
CONCRETE DESIGN
LE KOLLMEYER ARCH
KUNDE CO
GLADYS PITZ
BURNET REALTY
RON CLARK CONSTR
BRETT BOOS
GERALD COLEMAN
MICHAEL CORCORAN
DAVID HORNIG
11/13/90 23.89 GAIL BERKELEY
PERFORMANCE 11/29/90
PERFORMANCE 12/27/90
DUES
COST /GOODS SOLD
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BP UNIT SERVICE
CONSTRUCTION
CONSTRUCTION
CONSTRUCTION
OAK WILT PROGRAM
REFUND
REFUND
REFUND
REFUND
REFUND
REFUND
REFUND
REFUND
11 -19 -90 PAGE 8
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
10- 4204 - 140 -14 0454
30- 4624 - 783 -78 58944 1792
30- 4504 - 784 -78 03586 1525
10- 4510 - 440 -44
60- 1300 - 021 -20
60- 1300 - 020 -20
60- 1300 - 020 -20
10- 4248 - 644 -64
40- 3800 - 000 -00
40- 3800 - 000 -00
40- 3800 - 000 -00
40- 3800 - 000 -00
40- 3800 - 000 -00
40- 3800 - 000 -00
40- 3800 - 000 -00
40- 3800 - 000 -00
* * * -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
323840
.11/13/90
10- 4642 - 301 -30
7094
::::o*:
11/07/90
k k k k k k
1293
323A09
11/09/90
k* R k k k
10- 4642 - 560 -56
323A19
11/07/90
323A19
11/13/90
kkkkkk
323A29
11/13/90
323A29
11/08/90
kk *kkk
323A39
11/08/90
323A39
11/08/90
323A39
11/08/90
323A39
11/05/90
323A39
11/05/90
323A39
11/08/90
kkkkkk
323A49
11/05/90
323A49
11/05/90
323A49
11/05/90
323A49
11/08/90
323A49
11/05/90
323A49
11/05/90
323A49
11/05/90
k k k k k k
323A54
11/05/90
kkkkkk
323A57
11/08/90
AMOUNT
23.89 *
4,462.00
4,462.00 *
290.00
290.00 *
4,053.98
4,053.98 *
144.31
585.20
729.51 *
473.54
251.35
724.89 *
194.80
43.13
76.02
198.46
94.74
36.40
643.55
262.53
11.00
144.57
50.86
56.64
56.47
20.00
602.07
39.75
39.75
478.37
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ENGCO CONSTRU CO CONSTRUCTION
50 & FRANCE BUS ASSN ANNUAL DUES
AAA
ADVON
ADVON
ALBINSON
ALBINSON
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
AMERICAN LINEN
AMERICAN LINEN
AMERICAN LINEN
AMERICAN LINEN
AMERICAN LINEN
AMERICAN LINEN
AMERICAN LINEN
AAGARD
AMMONIA HOUSE
AUTO REG
GENERAL SUPPLIES
C 0 G S
DRAFTING MATERIALS
PEN POINTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
TOOLS
FACE SHIELD
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
HEARING PROTECTOR
11 -19 -90 PAGE 9
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
60- 1300 - 021 -20.
kkk -CKS
50- 4202 - 820 -82
* ** -CKS
10- 4310 - 560 -56
* ** -CKS
30- 4504 - 783 -78 897349 1684
30- 4624 - 783 -78 897207 1791,
* ** -CKS
10- 4570 - 260 -26 693767 5352
10- 4570 - 260 -26 693266 5352
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 440 -44
7093
1486
10- 4580 - 301 -30
7095
1501
10- 4642 - 301 -30
7094
1408
10- 4642 - 560 -56
7085
1293
10- 4642 - 560 -56
7090
1408
10- 4642 - 560 -56
7096
1509
* ** -CKS
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
LINEN
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
10- 4262 - 440 -44
10- 4262 - 482 -48
10- 4262 - 520 -52
27- 4262 - 663 -66 5515
50- 4262 - 821 -82
50- 4262 - 841 -84
50- 4262 - 861 -86
* ** -CKS
CARDBOARD RECYCLING 50- 4250 - 861 -86
* ** -CKS
REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 704 -70 018431 1442
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
11 -19 -90 PAGE 10
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
# MESSAGE
478.37
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323A99
11/13/90
19.65
AXT -LYLE
CONCESSIONS
29- 4624- 722 -72
19.65
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323602
11/08/90
5.00
BFI PORTABLE SERV
RUBBISH REMOVAL
27- 4250 - 662 -66
5.00
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323B14
11/05/90
31.30
BOYER TRUCK PARTS
BRACKET
10- 4540 - 560 -56
873671
1335
31.30
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323B17
11/13/90
33,785.15
BFI RECYCLING SYS
RECYCLING CONTRACT
10- 4226 - 507 -50
323617
11/13/90
182.40
BFI RECYCLING SYS
RECYCLING
10- 4226 - 507 -50
10283
33,967.55
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323B22
11/08/90
470.20
BEER WHOLESALERS
BEER
27- 4630 - 663 -66
5505
323B22
11/08/90
452.15
BEER WHOLESALERS
BEER
50- 4630 - 822 -82
- 323822
11/08/90
2,207.85
BEER WHOLESALERS
BEER
50- 4630 - 842 -84
323B22
11/08/90
1,913.95
BEER WHOLESALERS
BEER
50- 4630 - 862 -86
5,044.15
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323B25
11/05/90
100.00
BENNETT -WAYNE
POLICE SERVICES
10- 4100 - 430 -42
100.00
*
323026
11/13/90
235.20
BERG & FARNHAM CO.
LIQUOR DELIVERY
50- 4626 - 822 -82
323826
11/13/90
380.10
BERG & FARNHAM CO.
LIQUOR DELIVERY
50- 4626- 842 -84
323B26
11/13/90
375.38
BERG & FARNHAM CO.
LIQUOR DELIVERY
50- 4626- 862 -86
990.68
*
* ** -CKS
323830
11/13/90
11.42
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 440 -44
618267
323B30
11/13/90
106.47
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
618267
323630
11/05/90
70.85
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 510 -51
616091
323B30
11/07/90
5.52
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
607256
323B30
11/13/90
42.49
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIE
10- 4516 - 440 -44
617145
1045
323B30
11/08/90
236.00
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
FIX /FURN
23- 1330 - 000 -00
613321
1376
472.75
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323B32
11/08/90
23.39
BEST LOCK OF MPLS
LOCKS
27- 4540 - 666 -66
9358
1698
23.39
*
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
10- 4504 - 180 -18 1541
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
10- 4210 - 140 -14
323B62
11/05/90
33.83
BOYUM EQUIPMENT
FASTENERS
10- 4201 - 480 -48 12002
33.83
*
27- 4258 - 662 -66
30- 4258 - 782 -78
323870
11/13/90
874.72
BARRETT MOV /STORE
VOTING EQUIP MOVED
874.72
*
* * * * **
323B76
11/13/90
194.00
BRANDOW - HOWARD INC.
INSURANCE
* * * * **
194.00
*
323881
11/05/90
3,231.83
BRW INC.
CONSTRUCTION
3,231.83
*
323B82
11/05/90
34.26
BRUNSON INSTRUMENT
PENCILS %LEAD
34.26
*
* * * * **
323B93
11/13/90
306.26
BRC ELECT /MIDWEST
ELECTION SUPPLIES
306.26
*
* * * * **
323C18
11/05/90
35.00
CEDAR LAKE FLORAL
FLOWERS
323C18
11/07/90
29.00
CEDAR LAKE FLORAL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
64.00
*
* * * * **
323C25
11/08/90
76.00
CHAPIN PUBLISHING
AD FOR BIDS
76.00
*
* * * * **
323C30
11/07/90
155.00
CITY BEER
BEER
323C30
11/08/90
118.40
CITY BEER
BEER
273.40
*
323C31
11/05/90
27,972.25
CITY OF BLOOMINGTON
HEALTH SERVICES
27,972.25
*
323C32
11/05/90
77.52
FRAN CALLAHAN
MILEAGE /OCT
77.52
*
323C33
11/07/90
174.17
CITY OF EDINA
WATER
323C33
11/13/90
687.57
CITY OF EDINA
WATER
861.74
*
11 -19 -90 PAGE 11
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
10- 4620 - 560 -56 5895 1092
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 180 -18
* ** -CKS
10- 4260 - 510 -51
* ** -CKS
27- 1300 - 003 -00 59840
10- 4504 - 260 -26 082058 5353
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 180 -18 1541
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 100 -10 530819 1627
30- 4504 - 781 -78 531417 1687
* ** -CKS
10- 4210 - 140 -14
* ** -CKS
50- 4630 - 842 -84
50- 4630 - 862 -86
10- 4201 - 480 -48 12002
10- 4208 - 480 -48
27- 4258 - 662 -66
30- 4258 - 782 -78
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
11 -19 -90
PAGE 12
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. #
MESSAGE
323C34
11/09/90
42.32
CITY OF RICHFIELD
LIGHT /POWER
41- 4252 - 900 -90
1872
`
42.32
* ** * **
* ** -CKS
323C36
11/07/90
12.25
CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV
WINDOW CLEANING
50- 4248 - 821 -82
14175
323C36
11/07/90
12.25
CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV
WINDOW CLEANING
50- 4248 - 841 -84
14176
323C36
11/07/90
12.25
CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV
WINDOW CLEANING
50- 4248 - 861 -86
14177
36.75
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323C44
11/08/90
115.00
COCA COLA BOTTLING
COKE
27- 4624 - 662 -66
5507
323044
11/08/90
581.50
COCA COLA BOTTLING
COST OF GOODS
28- 4624 - 703 -70
1388
323C44
11/07/90
253.49
COCA COLA BOTTLING
MIX
50- 4632 - 822 -82
323C44
11/07/90
715.93
COCA COLA BOTTLING
MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
323044
11/13/90
580.99
COCA COLA BOTTLING
MIX
50- 4632- 862 -86
2,246.91
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323049
11/13/90
110.00
COMPUTERLAND
ON SITE LABOR
10- 4288 - 510 -51
323C49
11/13/90
147.50
COMPUTERLAND
ON SITE LABOR
10- 4288 - 510 -51
257.50
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323C51
11/07/90
589.60
COMM OF REVENUE
FUEL TAX
10- 4612- 560 -56
002068
589.60 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323C60
11/05/90
48.00
CONSTR FASTENING SYS
ADAPTOR
10- 4580 - 301 -30
14597
1490
48.00 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323C64
11/08/90
187.12
SYSCO MINNESOTA
SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 663 -66
5510
323064
11/08/90
68.53
SYSCO MINNESOTA
CLEANING SUPPLIES
27- 4512 - 663 -66
5510
323064
11/08/90
1,241.72
SYSCO MINNESOTA
CONCESSIONS
27- 4624 - 663 -66
5510
1,497.37 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323C87
11/09/90
550.64
CURTIN MATHESON SCI
LAB SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 482 -48
1421
323C87
11/08/90
428.75
CURTIN MATHESON SCI
LAB SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 482 -48
1412
979.39 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323C89
11/05/90
23.55
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
46185
1370
23.55 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
* ** -CKS
CHECK REGISTER
165775
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
323C92
11/13/90
870.00
CUSTOM FIRE APP
MAINT
323C92
11/13/90
290.00
CUSTOM FIRE APP
MAINT
323C92
11/13/90
429.65
CUSTOM FIRE APP
REPAIR PARTS
323C92
11/13/90
231.62
CUSTOM FIRE APP
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4201 - 647 -64
14863 7094
1,821.27
*
323C93
11/05/90
28.51
CERT HYD SPEC
CABLE
28.51
*
kkkkkk
323D27
11/08/90
176.52
DAVE S FOOD WAGON
DAIRY
.176.52
*
kkkkkk
323D29
11/08/90
196.35
DAVIDSEN DIST. INC.
BEER
196.35
k k k k k k
323D37
11/13/90
35.23
DAY - TIMERS INC.
SUPPLIES
35.23
*
kkkkkk
323D47
11/13/90
16.83
DEPENDABLE COURIER
DELIVERY FEE
16.83
*
k k k k k k
323D61
11/05/90
100.00
DICK NISSEN
POLICE SERVICES
100.00
*
Rkkkkk
323D78
11/13/90
5,718.88
DEDE HENSEL
SERVICES
5,718.88
*
kkk� *k
323D98
11/07/90
600.00
DCA INC
PLAN DOCUMENT
323D98
11/07/90
750.75
DCA INC
FEE FOR SERVICE
1,350.75
*
k k k k k k
323E02
11/05/90
537.92
E KRAEMER & SONS INC
CLASS 2 ROCK
537.92
*
kkkkkk
323E17
11/07/90
3,780.25
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
BEER
323E17
11/07/90
8,599.70
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
BEER
ACCOUNT NO. IN
10- 4274 - 440 -44
10- 4274 - 440 -44
10- 4540 - 560 -56
10- 4540 - 560 -56
10- 4540 - 560 -56
27- 4624- 663 -66
50- 4630 - 842 -84
10 -4504- 140 -14
11 -19 -90 PAGE 13
V. # P.O. # MESSAGE
003247
003246 1051
003247
003246 1051
79816 1291
* ** -CKS
5508
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
10- 4290 - 510 -51
165775
* ** -CKS
10- 4100 - 430 -42
* ** -CKS
28- 4224 - 701 -70
* ** -CKS
10- 4156 - 510 -51
41312
10- 4156- 510 -51
40053'
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 647 -64
14863 7094
* ** -CKS
50- 4630 - 822 -82
50- 4630 - 842 -84
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
323E17
11/08/90
* * * * **
GENERAL SUPPLIES
323E57
11/08/90
* * * * **
INSURANCE
323E94
11/08/90
* * * * * *
INSURANCE
323F56
11/13/90
323F56
11/13/90
323F56
11/09/90
* * * * * *
323G01
11/07/90
323G01
11/07/90
323G01
11/07/90
323G01
11/07/90
323G01
11/07/90
323G01
11/07/90
323G01
11/07/90
323G02
11/13/90
* * * * **
TARGETS
.323G32
11/07/90
* * * * **
323G38
11/05/90
* * * * **
323G42
11/05/90
323G42
11/05/90
* * * * **
323G88
11/13/90
* * * * **
AMOUNT
7,922.11
20,302.06 *
112.88
112.88 *
3,990.00
3,990.00 *
22.00
614.00
3,626.00
4,262.00 *
1,101.84
201.80
207.83
208.86
89.20
19.60
313.70
2,142.83 *
1,205.00
1,205.00 *
742.50
742.50 *
100.00
100.00 *
326.61
189.00
•515.61
26.00
26.00
CHECK REGISTER
* ** -CKS
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
BEER
E -Z SHARP INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ESS BROS & SONS
STORM SEWER GRATES
FRANK B. HALL & CO.
INSURANCE
FRANK B. HALL & CO.
INSURANCE
FRANK B. HALL & CO.
INSURANCE
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
G & K SERVICES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
LIZ GEREBI
SERVICE
GOPHER STATE 1 CALL
UTIL LOCATES
GEORGE BUTLER
POLICE SERVICES
GIL HEBARD GUNS
AMMO
GIL HEBARD GUNS
TARGETS
GRUBER POWER EQUIP REPAIR PARTS
11 -19 -90 PAGE 14
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
50- 4630- 862 -86
* ** -CKS
28- 4504 - 702 -70 7952 1255
* ** -CKS
41- 4552- 900 -90 3002 1569
* ** -CKS
10 -4260- 510 -51
10- 4260 - 510 -51
10- 4260 - 510 -51 058253
* ** -CKS
10- 4262 - 301 -30
10- 4262 - 560 -56
10- 4262 - 646 -64
10- 4512 - 540 -54
28- 4262 - 702 -70
30- 4262- 782 -78
40- 4262 - 801 -80
30- 3505 - 000 -00
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
10- 4318 - 280 -28
* ** -CKS
10- 4100 - 430 -42
* ** -CKS
29- 4572 - 722 -72 36820 1471
29- 4648 - 722 -72 36820 1471
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 646 -64 9993 1731
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
323H21
11/08/90
134.93
HARMON GLASS
WINDSHIELD
134.93 *
323H22
11/05/90
100.00
HAROLD SWANSON
POLICE SERVICES
100.00 *
323H23.
11/13/90
10,392.00
HARRIS HOMEYER CO.
INSURANCE
323H23
11/13/90
28,377.00
HARRIS HOMEYER CO.
INSURANCE
323H23
11/13/90
10,392.00
HARRIS HOMEYER CO.
INSURANCE
323H23
11/13/90
4,863.00
HARRIS HOMEYER CO.
INSURANCE
323H23
11/13/90
28,377.00
HARRIS HOMEYER CO.
INSURANCE
323H23
.11/13/90
4,863.00
HARRIS HOMEYER CO.
INSURANCE
87,264.00 *
* * * * **
323H36
11/13/90
305.73
HENN CTY MED CENTER
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
305.73 *
323H37
11/13/90
105.00
HENN TECH CENTER
SCHOOL
105.00 *
* * * * **
323H61
11/09/90
1,730.58-
HOFFERS INC
GLASS REPAIR
323H61
11/09/90
1,730.58
HOFFERS INC
GLASS REPAIR
323H61
11/09/90
1,730.58
HOFFERS INC
GLASS REPAIR
1,730.58 *
* * * * **
323H65
11/05/90
100.00
HOFFMAN- WILLIAM
POLICE SERVICES
100.00 *
* * * * **
323H74
11/09/90
8.48
HOOTEN CLEANERS
LAUNDRY
8.48 *
* * * * **
323H85
11/05/90
26.50
HUMPHREY RADIATOR
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
26.50 *
* * * * **
323I59
11/05/90
79.45
INTERIOR COM SYS.
PHONE REPAIRS
323I59
11/05/90
79.45-
INTERIOR COM SYS.
PHONE REPAIRS
323I59
11/05/90
79.45
INTERIOR COM SYS.
PHONE.REPAIRS
323I59
11/13/90
266.45
INTERIOR COM SYS.
PHONE REPLACE
345.90
* * ** **
323I61
11/08/90
9.10
INTERSTATE
TIMING GAUGE
11 -19 -90 PAGE 15
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4248 - 560 -56 1515
10- 4100 - 430 -42
10- 4260 - 510 -51
10- 4260 - 510 -51
10- 4260 - 510 -51
10- 4260- 510 -51
10- 4260 - 510 -51
10- 4260 - 510 -51
10- 4510 - 440 -44 987 5058
10- 4202 - 440 -44 024645 1052
10- 4540 - 373 -30 167034 9275
10- 4540 - 373 -30 167034 9275
10- 4540 - 375 -30 167034 9275
10- 4100 - 430 -42
10- 4262 - 420 -42
10- 4248 - 560 -56 1492
10- 4248 - 490 -49 029688
10- 4248 - 490 -49 029688
10- 4808 - 490 -49 029688
50- 4501 - 820 -82 29593
10- 4580- 560 -56 154821 1422
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
9.10
* * * * **
323J27
11/08/90
29.91
JERRYS
FOODS
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
29.91
* * * * **
323J31
11/08/90
13.97
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
323J31
11/08/90
86.04
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
323J31
11/08/90
13.71
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
323J31
11/08/90
10.69
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
323J31
11/08/90
33.22
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
323J31
11/08/90
19.47
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
323J31
11/08/90
118.12
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
323J31
11/08/90
69.68
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
323J31
11/08/90
78.27
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
:323J31
11/08/90
446.99
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
323J31
11/08/90
33.26
JERRYS
HARDWARE
REPAIR
PARTS
323J31
11/08/90
5.90
JERRYS
HARDWARE
REPAIR
PARTS
323J31
11/08/90
60.38
JERRYS
HARDWARE
REPAIR
PARTS
323J31
11/08/90
67.95
JERRYS
HARDWARE
TOOLS
323J31
11/08/90
38.49
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
323J31
11/08/90
7.47
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
323J31
11/08/90
537.53
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
323J31
11/08/90
32.99
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
1,674.13
323J35
11/05/90
1.80
JERRYS
PRINTING
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
'323J35
11/05/90
168.00
JERRYS
PRINTING
PRINTING
323J35
11/05/90
483.00
JERRYS
PRINTING
PRINTING
323J35
11/05/90
267.00
JERRYS
PRINTING
PRINTING
919.80
323J74
11/08/90
228.60
JUSTUS
LUMBER
LUMBER
323J74
11/08/90
56.33
JUSTUS
LUMBER
LUMBER
°323J74
11/08/90
32.80
JUSTUS
LUMBER
LUMBER
323J74
11/08/90
464.33
JUSTUS
LUMBER
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
782.06
* * * * **
323J99
11/13/90
40.00
JANET CANTON
MILEAGE /LOGIS
40.00
* * * * **
323K09
11/05/90
29.57
KAMAN INDUST TECH
PARTS
323K09
11/05/90
24.50
KAMAN INDUST TECH
PARTS
54.07
11 -19 -90 PAGE 16
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
23- 4504 - 611 -61
10- 4504- 260 -26
10- 4504 - 301 -30
10- 4504 - 322 -30
10- 4504 - 325 -30
10- 4504 - 390 -39
10- 4504 - 420 -42
10- 4504- 440 -44
10- 4504 - 540 -54
10- 4504 - 560 -56
10- 4504- 646 -64
10- 4540- 520 -52
10- 4540 - 540 -54
10- 4540 - 560 -56
10- 4580 - 644 -64
27- 4504 - 661 -66
30- 4504- 782 -78
40- 4504 - 801 -80
40- 4504 - 802 -80
10- 4504 - 627 -62 10036
23- 4600 - 611 -61 4331 1209
23- 4600- 611 -61 4333 1210
23- 4600 - 611 -61 4332 1209
10- 4604 - 646 -64 66224 1557
30- 4544- 782 -78 66098 1555
30- 4544- 782 -78 63653 1303
40- 4504 - 802 -80 63306 1268
10- 4208 - 160 -16
10- 4620 - 560 -56 1334
10- 4620 - 560 -56 1334
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
11 -19 -90
PAGE 17
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323K23
11/07/90
384.41
KELLY SERVICES INC
TEMP HELP
10- 4201 - 180 -18
384.41
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323K35
11/05/90
22.78
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
PLYWOOD
10- 4504 - 440 -44
598600
1352
323K35
11/08/90
161.10
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
741158
1380
323K35
11/05/90
71.40
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
759898
1341
323K35
11/05/90
4.89-
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
CREDIT
10- 4504 - 646 -64
598558
323K35
11/08/90
445.76
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
741175
1379
.323K35
11/05/90
36.97
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
598557
1351
323K35
11/05/90
419.03
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
746580
1256
323K35
11/08/90
109.00
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
MATERIAL
10- 4540 - 520 -52
598755
1500
323K35
11/05/90
63.93
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
PLYWOOD
10- 4540 - 540 -54
712031
1416
323K35
11/05/90
113.44
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
712218
1397
323K35
11/08/90
14.78
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
LUMBER
27- 4504 - 662 -66
741026
1675
323K35
11/05/90
70.98
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 664 -66
740728
1624'
323K35
11/07/90
15.39
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
WOOD LATH
27- 4504 - 664 -66
740742
1674
323K35
11/08/90
22.52
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
REPAIRS
28- 4248 - 702 -70
712294
1458
323K35
11/08/90
42.41
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
REPAIRS
28- 4248 - 702 -70
741005
1610
323K35
11/08/90
38.15
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
REPAIRS
28- 4248 - 702 -70
711980
1443
323K35
11/08/90
47.84
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
40- 4504 - 802 -80
740791
1593
323K35
11/05/90
8.67
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
POLYSTYRENE
40- 4504 - 811 -80
712102
1498
323K35
11/05/90
12.00
KNOX
COMM
CREDIT
POLYSTYRENE
40- 4504 - 811 -80
712123
1499
1,711.26 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323K45
11/08/90
290.00
KOKESH ATHLETIC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 621 -62
36528
290.00 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323K57
11/07/90
2,338.65
KUETHER DIST.
CO.
BEER
50- 4630 - 822 -82
323K57
11/07/90
3,549.50
KUETHER DIST.
CO.
BEER
50- 4630 - 842 -84
5,888.15
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323L01
11/13/90
735.00
LINDA
KOZAK
SERV 11/21- 12/4/90
30- 4201 - 781 -78
735.00 *
323L02
11/13/90
1,033.94
LABOR
RELATIONS
ASN.
FEE FOR SERVICE
10- 4201-140 -14
1,033.94 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323L04
11/05/90
76.10
LAHASS
RECEPTICAL
10- 4540 - 560 -56
107195
1493
76.10 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323L28
11/05/90
276.50
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 325 -30
1159
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
323L28
11/05/90
323L28
11/05/90
323L28
11/05/90
323L28
11/08/90
323L28
11/05/90
323L28
11/05/90
kkkkkk
PUMP BOLTS
323L34
11/13/90
*kkkkk
32306
11/07/90
323L36
11/07/90
kkkkkk
323L38
11/07/90
kkkkkk
323L52
11/13/90
kkkkk k
323L55
11/08/90
323L55
11/13/90
kkkkkk
323L70
11/13/90
kkkkkk
323L97
11/05/90
kkkkkk
323L99
11/05/90
kkkkkk
323M02
11/08/90
323M02
11/08/90
AMOUNT
72.01
78.33
466.18
343.22
276.90
231.24
1,744.38 *
33.75
33.75 *
328.75
498.00
826.75 *
1,072.00
1,072.00 *
386.80
386.80 *
72.00
670.00
742.00 *
125.00
125.00 *
100.00
100.00 *
230.00
230.00 *
69.57
46.71
116.28 *
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
TAPE
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
TOOLS
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
PARTS
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
GENERA SUPPLIES
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
PUMP BOLTS
LEEF BROS. INC. LAUNDRY
LEFFLER PRINTING
LEFFLER PRINTING
LEITNER COMPANY
LINJO ASSOC
LINDENSELSER LANDFL
LINDENSELSER LANDFL
LUCY ROSCHE
MERFELD -BERT
M & S ROOFING
11 -19-80 PAGE 18
ACCOUNT NO. INV, # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4504 - 560 -56
10- 4580 - 560 -56
10- 4620 - 560 -56
27- 4504 - 664 -66
40- 4504 - 801 -80
40- 4540 - 803 -80
27- 4262 - 664 -66
1161
1160
1160
1431
1157
1158
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
PRINTING 10- 4504 - 510 -51 4346 9861
OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 4379 1683
* ** -CKS
TOPDRESSING 27- 4562 - 664 -66
* ** -CKS
WATER TREATMENT 30- 4564 - 783 -78 2862 1127
* ** -CKS
HAUL BRUSH 10- 4250 - 644 -64 6374
RUBBISH REMOVAL 10- 4250 - 644 -64
* ** -CKS
CLEANING 27- 4201 - 662 -66 3060 91461
* ** -CKS
POLICE SERVICES 10- 4100 - 430 -42
REPAIR PARTS
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. DUAL SHAFT
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. PARTS
* ** -CKS
10- 4540- 540 -54 3058 1489
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56 9661 1419
10- 4540 - 560 -56 9703 1292
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
* * * * **
10- 4504 - 322 -30
323M07
11/07/90
323M07
11/07/90
323M07
11/08/90
* * * * **
10 -4504- 560 -56
323M13
11/09/90
323M14
11/13/90
323M14
11/05/90
* * * * **
10- 4540 - 560 -56
323M16
11/07/90
323M16
11/13/90
* * * * **
323M18
11/08/90
323M19
11/08/90
323M19
11/08/90
323M19
11/08/90
323M19
11/08/90
323M19
11/08/90
323M19
11/08/90
323M19
11/07/90
PIPE
60- 1300 - 299 -04
323M22
11/05/90
323M22
11/13/90
323M22
11/13/90
323M22
11/13/90
* * * * **
1338
323M27
11/13/90
323M27
11/05/90
323M27
11/05/90
323M27
11/08/90
323M27
11/05/90
323M27
11/13/90
323M27
11/13/90
AMOUNT
4,460.00
9,322.51
8,663.19
22,445.70
2,567.50
2,567.50 *
25.00
25.00
50.00 *
864.50
435.66
1,300.16
244.93
244.93
16.65
42.00
7.38
24.20
3,143.80
669.68
314.59
4,218.30
111.23
424.84
374.08
305.93
1,216.08
464.50
487.15
370.00
467.50
308.55
475.50
376.31
2,949.51
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MATT BULLOCK CONST
MAUMA
MAUMA
MCCAREN DESIGNS
MCCAREN DESIGNS
MCGARVEY COFFEE
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
MCNEILUS STEEL
MCNEILUS STEEL
MCNEILUS STEEL
MCNEILUS STEEL
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
BEER
BEER
BEER
11 -19 -90 PAGE 19
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
50- 4630- 822 -82
50- 4630 - 842 -84
50- 4630 - 862 -86
* ** -CKS
REPAIRS 41- 4248 - 902 -90 1326
DUES 10- 4204 - 140 -14
DUES 10- 4204 - 140 -14
* ** -CKS
PLANTS 30- 4560 - 782 -78 03746 1314'
PLANTS 30- 4560- 782 -78 03876 1795
COFFEE 27- 4624 - 663 -66 91383 7184
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 322 -30
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 343 -30
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 560 -56
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540- 664 -66
STEEL
10- 4620 - 560 -56
23564
1294
ANGLE
60- 1300 - 290 -04
24636
1392
SHEET OF STEEL
60- 1300 - 290 -04
24637
1396
PIPE
60- 1300 - 299 -04
24975
1405
CLEANING SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 645 -64
25556
1642
POLYLINERS /WYP ALLS
10- 4512 - 540 -54
25432
1338
ICE MELT
10- 4520 - 318 -30
25406
1337
PARTS
10- 4620- 560 -56
25464
1395
CLEANING SUPPLIES
23- 4512 - 612 -61
25369
1267
CLEANING SUPPLIES
30- 4512 - 782 -78
25558
1691
REPAIR PARTS
30- 4540 - 782 -78
25557
1369
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK
REGISTER
11 -19 -90
PAGE 20
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. #
MESSAGE
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323M32
11/07/90
192.13
M AMUNDSON
CIGARETTES
50- 4632 - 822 -82
1476
323M32
11/05/90
281.64
M AMUNDSON
CIGARETTES
50- 4632 - 842 -84
1367
323M32
11/07/90
221.76
M AMUNDSON
CIGARETTES
50- 4632 - 842 -84
1500
323M32
11/13/90
323.76
M AMUNDSON
CIGARETTES
50- 4632 - 842 -84
1611
323M32
11/07/90
102.25
M AMUNDSON
CIGARETTES
50- 4632 - 862 -86
1474
323M32
11/13/90
205.24
M AMUNDSON
CIGARETTES
50- 4632 - 862 -86
1602
1,326.78
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323M35
11/08/90
16,038.00
METRO WASTE CONTROL
SAC CHARGE COLLECTED
10- 3095 - 490 -49
16,038.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323M42
11/05/90
78.43
MIDWEST ASPHALT
COR.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 314 -30
1007
323M42
11/08/90
107.77
MIDWEST ASPHALT
COR.
BLACKTOP
10- 4524- 301 -30
323M42
11/08/90
815.51
MIDWEST ASPHALT
COR.
BLACKTOP
10- 4524 - 314 -30
323M42
11/08/90
270.35
MIDWEST ASPHALT
COR.
BLACKTOP
10- 4524 - 380 -30
323M42
11/08/90
309.41
MIDWEST ASPHALT
COR.
BLACKTOP
40- 4524 - 803 -80
1,581.47
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323M46
11/08/90
86.76
METZ BAKING CO
BREAD
27- 4624 - 663 -66
5511
323M46
11/08/90
91.48
METZ BAKING CO
BREAD
27- 4624- 663 -66
5511
178.24 *
* * **
* ** -CKS
323M58
11/05/90
379.54
MILLIPORE
LAB SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 482 -48
120311 1420
379.54 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323M63
11/07/90
331.51
MN. BAR
MIX
50- 4632 - 822 -82
323M63
11/07/90
631.30
MN. BAR
MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
323M63
11/13/90
564.90
MN. BAR
MIX
50- 4632- 862 -86
1,527.71
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323M69
11/05/90
59.70
MCC /MIDWEST
CRAFT SUPPLIES
23- 4588 - 611 -61
46824 1373
59.70 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323M73
11/13/90
91.10
MN. ELEVATOR
SERVICE CONTRACT.
30- 4288 - 782 -78
100436
91.10 *
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323M80
11/05/90
18.88
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
AD FOR BIDS
10- 4210 - 140 -14
89019
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
11 -19 -90
PAGE 21
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
# MESSAGE
323M80
11/05/90
33.08
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
AD FOR BIDS
10- 4210 - 140 -14
89128
323M80
11/05/90
10.03
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
NOTICE ACCURACY TEST_
10- 4210 - 140 -14
89020
323M80
11/05/90
88.32
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
SAMPLE BALLOT
10- 4210 - 140 -14
89018
323M80
11/08/90
37.60
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
ADVERTISING
2.3- 4214 - 611 -61
126447
323M80
11/13/90
'1,682.00
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
ADVERTISING
30- 4600 - 781 -78
21271
1,869.91
*
323M81
11/07/90
21.69
MN. TORO INC.
MOWER PARTS
27 -4540- 664 -66
160678
1604
323M81
11/07/90
20.64
MN. TORO INC.
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540- 664 -66
160378
1540
42.33
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323M85
11/07/90
104.52
MN. WANNER
SPRAYER PARTS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
76604
1634
104.52
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323M90
11/08/90
169.44
MODEL STONE CO.
CONCRETE
10- 4528 - 314 -30
102256
7098
323M90
11/05/90
125.00
MODEL STONE CO.
CONCRETE
10- 4528 - 314 -30
101904
7098'
323M90
11/05/90
868.75
MODEL STONE CO.
CONCRETE
40- 4518- 900 -90
323M90
11/08/90
154.20
MODEL STONE CO.
CONCRETE
41- 4528 - 900 -90
102652
7098
1,317.39
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323M98
11/08/90
100.27
MINNEGASCO
GAS
10- 4254 - 646 -64
100.27
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323NO3
11/13/90
277.00
MPLS SEWER & WATER
CONTRACT REPAIR
40- 4248 - 800 -80
20947
323NO3
11/05/90
900.00
MPLS SEWER & WATER
SERVICE REPAIRS
40- 4248 - 801 -80
20929
1497
323NO3
11/05/90
780.00
MPLS SEWER & WATER
REPAIR SERVICE LINE
40- 4248 - 801 -80
20924
1507
323NO3
11/13/90
840.00
MPLS SEWER & WATER
SERVICE REPAIR
40- 4248 - 803 -80
20946
1694
323NO3
11/13/90
720.00
MPLS SEWER & WATER
SERVICE REPAIR
40- 4248 - 803 -80
20943
1774
3,517.00
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323N07
11/07/90
238.75
MTS NW SOUND
SERVICE CONTRACT
30- 4288 - 782 -78
87144
1686
238.75
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323N16
11/13/90
50.27
NSP
POWER /LIGHT
10- 4252 - 330 -30
323N16
11/13/90
855.05
NSP
POWER /LIGHT
10- 4252 - 646 -64
323N16
11/08/90
28.72
NSP
POWER /LIGHT
40- 4252 - 801 -80
323N16
11/08/90
25.08
NSP
POWER /LIGHT
40- 4252 - 801 -80
959.12
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323N21
11/08/90
35.40
NAPA AUTO PARTS
GASKETS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
665747
1578
323N21
11/05/90
155.88
NAPA AUTO PARTS
SEAT CUSHION
10- 4540- 560 -56
724494
8410
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
SYS.
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
323N21
11/08/90
9.46
SERVICE
NATL
200.74
323N22
11/08/90
146.72
323N22
11/08/90
75.00
323N22
11/08/90
494.99
323N22
11/08/90
117.59
323N22
11/07/90
173.24
323N22
11/07/90
184.78
1,192.32
* * * * **
323N31
11/08/90
43.40
43.40
* * * * **
323N68
11/07/90
95.58
323N68
11/07/90
202.50
323N68
11/08/90
241.92
540.00
* * * * **
323N82
11/08/90
46.20 -
323N82
11/08/90
177.71
131.51 *
* * * * **
323N96
11/07/90
76.00
76.00 *
* * * * **
323N98
11/13/90
506.22
506.22 *
323N99
11/13/90
47.61
323N99
11/13/90
11.69
323N99
11/13/90
49.24
323N99
11/13/90
47.70
156.24 *
* * * * **
323005
11/09/90
282.00
282.00 *
* * * * **
323017
11/13/90
40.00
40.00
* * * * **
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
NAPA AUTO PARTS GASKETS
NATL
GUARDIAN
SYS.
ALARM
SERVICE
NATL
GUARDIAN
SYS.
ALARM
SERVICE
NATL
GUARDIAN
SYS.
ALARM
NATL
GUARDIAN
SYS.
ALARM
SERVICE
NATL
GUARDIAN
SYS.
ALARM
SERVICE
NATL
GUARDIAN
SYS.
ALARM
SERVICE
NEBCO DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS
NORTHSTAR ICE
NORTHSTAR ICE
NORTHSTAR ICE
NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY
NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY
MINN COMM PAGING
NANCY KNUDSON
NAOMI JOHNSON
NAOMI JOHNSON
NAOMI JOHNSON
NAOMI JOHNSON
OUTPOST HUNT /SPORTS
OFFICE PRODUCTS
MIX
MIX
MIX
CREDIT
COST /GOODS SOLD
SERVICE CONTRACT
11 -19 -90 PAGE 22
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4540 - 560 -56 665860 1579
23- 4304 - 612 -61
23- 4304 - 612 -61
27- 4304 - 662 -66 271090
28- 4304 - 702 -70 271092
50- 4304 - 821 -82 271183
50- 4304 - 861 -86 271182
28- 4624 - 703 -70 028605 7070
50- 4632 - 822 -82
50- 4632 - 842 -84
50- 4632 - 862 -86
23- 4624 - 613 -61 177921
23- 4624 - 613 -61 178242 1545
30- 4288 - 781 -78
SERVICE 28- 4224 - 701 -70
AC GENERAL SUPPLIES 23- 4504 - 612 -61
GENERAL SUPPLIES 23- 4504 - 613 -61
OFFICE SUPPLIES 23- 4516- 611 -61
CRAFT SUPPLIES AC 23- 4588 - 611 -61
AMMO /GUN RANGE
CABLE
29- 4572 - 722 -72 0115 1472
10- 4504 - 510 -51 124763
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
11 -19 -90
PAGE 23
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. #
MESSAGE
323036
11/05/90
140.00
OLSON CHAIN & CABLE
CABLE
10- 4540 - 560 -56
104412 1393
140.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323P11
11/08/90
125.00
PARK NIC MED CTR
CONSULTATION
10- 4212 - 510 -51
323P11
11/05/90
144.07
PARK NIC MED CTR
PHYSICAL
10- 4246- 420 -42
269.07
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323P30
11/08/90
80.85
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
PEPSI
27- 4624 - 663 -66
5513
323P30
11/13/90
198.49
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
MIX
50- 4632 - 822 -82
323P30
11/08/90
406.77
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING.
MIX
50- 4632- 842 -84
323P30
11/13/90
412.69
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
MIX
50- 4632 - 862-86
1,098.80
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323P35
11/13/90
77.14
PETERSON- BARBARA
MILEAGE
30- 4208 - 781 -78
323P35
11/13/90
8.34
PETERSON- BARBARA
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504- 781 -78
323P35
11/13/90
69.75
PETERSON- BARBARA
OFFICE SUPPLIES
30- 4516 - 781 -78
323P35
11/13/90
30.10
PETERSON- BARBARA
OFFICE SUPPLIES
30- 4516 - 781 -78
323P35
11/13/90
29.64
PETERSON- BARBARA
REPAIR PARTS
30- 4540 - 782 -78
214.97
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323P46
11/05/90
21.84
PIONEER RIM & WHEEL
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
1289
21.84
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323P48
11/08/90
58.50
PIP PRINTING
PRINTING
28- 4600 - 701 -70
1623
323P48
11/07/90
125.50
PIP PRINTING
PRINTING
30- 4600 - 781 -78
8182 1622
184.00
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323P58
11/08/90
28.50
PLUNKETTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
28- 4504 - 702-70
175745
28.50
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323P75
11/13/90
50.00
PREMIER OUTDOOR SERV
SERVICE CONTRACT
30- 4288 - 782 -78
1394 1793
50.00
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323P78
11/08/90
65.00
PRINTERS SERV INC
SHARPENING
28- 4274 - 704 -70
55686
65.00
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323Q01
11/08/90
153.03
QUIK PRINT
PRINTING
28- 4600- 701 -70
040082 1535
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
11 -19 -90
PAGE 24
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
# MESSAGE
153.03
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323Q0S
11/08/90
83.75
QUALITY REFRIG
REPAIRS
27- 4288 - 663 -66
72042
1699
83.75
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323Q20
11/05/90
48.72
QUICK SERV BATTERY
OIL FILTER
10- 4540 - 560 -56
37412
1175
48.72
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323R05
11/05/90
54.72
R.E. MOONEY & ASSOC
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 801 -80
3499
1094
54.72
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323R13
11/13/90
132.00
RADIO INSTALLS
RADIO LEASE
10- 4226 - 440 -44
19437
5057,
132.00
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323R21
11/08/90
88.35
RED WING SHOES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 260 -26
323R21
11/08/90
81.55
RED WING SHOES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 667 -66
169.90
323R22
11/13/90
103.56
REM SUPPLIES
RINK GLOVES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
1254
1732
323R22
11/13/90
369.98
REM SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
1068
1784
323R22
11/05/90
174.60
REM SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
01219
323R22
11/07/90
55.44
REM SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
01261
1681
323R22
11/07/90
570.00
REM SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
01262
1695
323R22
11/09/90
423.35
REM SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
1268
7773
323R22
11/13/90
52.82
REM SUPPLIES
REPAIRS
30- 4540 - 782 -78
01266
1794
1,749.75
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323R25
11/08/90
28.55
RENTAL EQUIP & SALES
SAW REPAIR
10- 4540 - 644 -64
1491
1663
28.55
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323R33
11/13/90
4,855.01
REX DISTR.
BEER
50- 4630 - 822 -82
323R33
11/08/90
6,250.50
REX DISTR.
BEER
50- 4630 - 842 -84
323R33
11/08/90
5,695.35
REX DISTR.
BEER
50- 4630 - 862 -86
16,800.86
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323R53
11/08/90
425.00
ROBERT B. HILL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
28- 4504 - 702 -70
41689
1451
425.00
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
323R65
11/09/90
323R65
11/09/90
wwwwww
3,417.00
323R79
11/13/90
323R79
11/13/90
323R79
11/13/90
323R79
11/13/90
wwwwww
RTW INC.
323881
11/08/90
wwww **
FEE FOR SERVICE
323R98
11/13/90
wwwwww
2,281.95
323S15
11/05/90
wwwwww
RUBENSTEIN & ZIFF
323S19
11/05/90
wwwwww
323S27
11/08/90
323S27
11/08/90
323S27
11/08/90
323S27
11/05/90
wwwwww
7.49 *
323S36
11/07/90
323S36
11/07/90
323S36
11/08/90
www *ww
323S45
11/05/90
THIONNER /KNIVES
68.16
323S50
11/05/90
11 -19 -90 PAGE 25
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4612 - 560 -56 56709 1641
10- 4612 - 560 -56 56712 1641
* ** -CKS
10- 4260 - 510 -51
10- 4260 - 510 -51
10- 4260 - 510 -51
10- 4260 - 510 -51
* ** -CKS
23- 4588 - 611 -61 179281 1546
* ** -CKS
30- 4201 - 781 -78
* ** -CKS
10- 4580- 301 -30 1491
* ** -CKS
40- 4504 - 802 -80 185136 1330
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 335 -30 43618 1283
10- 4504 - 335 -30 43618 1283
10- 4504 - 335 -30 43618 1283
10- 4504 - 646 -64 44933 1331
* ** -CKS
50- 4630 - 822 -82
50- 4630 - 842 -84
50- 4630 - 862 -86
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 180 -18 049298
* ** -CKS
10- 4100 - 430 -42
CHECK REGISTER
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
4,338.00
ROLLINS OIL CO
GASOLINE
3,417.00
ROLLINS OIL CO
GASOLINE
7,755.00
276.00
RTW INC.
FEE FOR SERVICE
637.50
RTW INC.
FEE FOR SERVICE
558.45
RTW INC.
FEE FOR SERVICE
810.00
RTW INC.
FEE FOR SERVICE
2,281.95
42.08
RUBENSTEIN & ZIFF
CRAFT SUPPLIES
42.08
96.00
ROXANNE SEIDEL
SERVICE 12 -90
96.00 *
7.49
SEARS
CORD
7.49 *
141.22
SEELYE PLASTICS
PLEXIGLASS
141.22 *
68.16-
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
THIONNER /KNIVES
68.16
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
THIONNER /KNIVES
68.16
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
THINNER /KNIVES
37.16
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
105.32 *
2,651.50
SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO.
BEER
7,844.85
SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO.
BEER
313.00
SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO.
BEER
10,809.35 *
14.14
ST. PAUL BOOK
GENERAL SUPLLIES
14.14 *
100.00
JOHN SHEPARD
POLICE SERVICES
11 -19 -90 PAGE 25
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4612 - 560 -56 56709 1641
10- 4612 - 560 -56 56712 1641
* ** -CKS
10- 4260 - 510 -51
10- 4260 - 510 -51
10- 4260 - 510 -51
10- 4260 - 510 -51
* ** -CKS
23- 4588 - 611 -61 179281 1546
* ** -CKS
30- 4201 - 781 -78
* ** -CKS
10- 4580- 301 -30 1491
* ** -CKS
40- 4504 - 802 -80 185136 1330
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 335 -30 43618 1283
10- 4504 - 335 -30 43618 1283
10- 4504 - 335 -30 43618 1283
10- 4504 - 646 -64 44933 1331
* ** -CKS
50- 4630 - 822 -82
50- 4630 - 842 -84
50- 4630 - 862 -86
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 180 -18 049298
* ** -CKS
10- 4100 - 430 -42
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
* * * * **
323554
11/07/90
* * * * **
GRASS
323572
11/09/90
323573
11/13/90
* * * * **
SEED
323577
11/05/90
323577
11/05/90
323S77
11/05/90
323S77
11/08/90
323S77
11/08/90
323S77
11/08/90
323S77
11/08/90
323578
11/05/90
323S78
11/08/90
* * * * **
323592
11/05/90
* * * * **
323T05
11/05/90
* * * * **
323T08
11/07/90
323T09
11/08/90
* * * * **
323T11
11/08/90
323T11
11/13/90
323T11
11/08/90
323T11
11/08/90
323T11
11/13/90
AMOUNT
100.00 *
311.17
311.17 *
138.25
138.25 *
354.25
354.25 *
270.00
304.92
365.75
47.00
156.00
9.72
95.25
1,248.64 *
83.25
12.53
95.78 *
16.14
16.14 *
723.80
723.80 *
39.94
39.94 *
258.00
258.00 *
330.50
330.50
330.52
330.52-
358.00
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
STAR TRIBUNE
STREICHERS
STRGAR- ROSCOE -FAUSH
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
SYSTEM SUPPLY
THE PRINT SHOP
TARGET
T.I.P.S.
TESSMAN SEED & CHEM
TESSMAN SEED & CHEM
TESSMAN SEED & CHEM
TESSMAN SEED & CHEM
TESSMAN SEED & CHEM
WANT ADS
11 -19 -90 PAGE 26
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
10- 4212 - 510 -51
* ** -CKS
EQUIP REPLACE 10- 4901 - 420 -42 1432
PRO ENG SERV 60- 1300 - 291 -04 901320
BODY REPAIR
BODY REPAIR
WARRANTY REPAIR
CONTROL
RECIEVER
PARTS
PARTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
REPAIR PARTS
NYLON RIBBONS
MONTHLY NEWSLETTER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SHOPPING SERVICE
* ** -CKS
10- 4248 - 560 -56 7223
10- 4248 - 560 -56 7619
10- 4248 - 560 -56 66023
10- 4540 - 560 -56 134792
10- 4540 - 560 -56 134791
10- 4540 - 560 -56 134884
10- 4540 - 560 -56 134943
30- 4504 - 784 -78 1439
30- 4540 - 782 -78 1364
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 540 -54 100529 1389
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 628 -62 15038 1317
10- 4504 - 260 -26
50- 4201 - 861 -86 1105
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
GRASS
SEED
10- 4568 - 643 -64
68767
1090
GRASS
SEED
10- 4568- 643 -64
69702
1090
GRASS
SEED
10- 4568- 643 -64
68767
1090
GRASS
SEED
10- 4568 - 643 -64
68767
1090
SEED /RAKE
10- 4568 - 643 -64
69868
1506
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
* * * * **
CHECK REGISTER
323T13
11/07/90
323T13
11/07/90
323T13
11/07/90
* * * * **
540.00
323T29
11/07/90
323T30
11/08/90
* * * * **
76.50
323T40
11/08/90
323T40
11/08/90
14,143.71
323T66
11/05/90
* * * * **
323T74
11/08/90
* * * * **
BEER
323T88
11/07/90
323T88
11/08/90
* * * * **
FILE
323T96
11/08/90
* * * * **
47.00 *
323U08
11/13/90
323U08
11/13/90
* * * * **
78.21 *
323V15
11/13/90
323V15
11/13/90
323V15
11/13/90
11 -19 -90 PAGE 27
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 644 -64
10- 4201 - 980 -64
10- 4208 - 980 -64
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 220 -22
50- 4630 - 862 -86
* ** -CKS
40- 4504 - 801 -80 30703 1353'
40- 4504 - 803 -80 30702 1353
* ** -CKS
23- 4588 - 611 -61 405554 1377
* ** -CKS
10- 4558 - 643 -64 31195 9424
* ** -CKS
50- 4632 - 842 -84
50- 4632- 862 -86
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 540 -54 13369 1480
* ** -CKS
10- 4266 - 420 -42
10- 4266 - 430 -42 -
* ** -CKS
50- 4514 - 822 -82 332334 1454
50- 4514 - 842 -84 332338 1454
50- 4514- 862 -86 332340 1454
CHECK REGISTER
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
1,019.00
540.00
TOM HORWATH
FORESTRY
345.00
TOM HORWATH
TRIMMING
76.50
TOM HORWATH
MILEAGE
961.50 *
14,143.71
THOMSEN - NYBECK
PROSECUTING
14,143.71 *
11,941.50
THORPE DISTR.
BEER
11,941.50 *
21.93
TOLL COMPANY
FILE
25.07
TOLL COMPANY
PROPANE
47.00 *
78.21
TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT
CRAFT SUPPLIES
78.21 *
266.99
TURF SUPPLY CO.
FERTILIZER
266.99 *
153.96
TWIN CITY HOME JUICE
MIX
75.06
TWIN CITY HOME JUICE
MIX
229.02 *
59.00
TWIN CITY GAR. DOOR
REPAIR DOOR
59.00 *
4,164.86
UNIFORM UNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
79.90
UNIFORM UNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
4,244.76 *
1,285.30
VAN PAPER CO.
PAPER BAGS
3,529.48
VAN PAPER CO.
PAPER BAGS
1,310.03
VAN PAPER CO.
PAPER BAGS
11 -19 -90 PAGE 27
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 644 -64
10- 4201 - 980 -64
10- 4208 - 980 -64
* ** -CKS
10- 4201 - 220 -22
50- 4630 - 862 -86
* ** -CKS
40- 4504 - 801 -80 30703 1353'
40- 4504 - 803 -80 30702 1353
* ** -CKS
23- 4588 - 611 -61 405554 1377
* ** -CKS
10- 4558 - 643 -64 31195 9424
* ** -CKS
50- 4632 - 842 -84
50- 4632- 862 -86
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 540 -54 13369 1480
* ** -CKS
10- 4266 - 420 -42
10- 4266 - 430 -42 -
* ** -CKS
50- 4514 - 822 -82 332334 1454
50- 4514 - 842 -84 332338 1454
50- 4514- 862 -86 332340 1454
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
*wwwww
323W08
11/05/90
323W08
11/05/90
323W08
11/08/90
323W08
11/09/90
wwwwww
323W15
11/05/90
www *ww
323W28
11/05/90
323W28
11/08/90
323W28
11/05/90
wwwwww
323W41
11/09/90
wwwwww
323W44
11/08/90
wwwwww
323W52
11/05/90
wwwwww
323W92
11/05/90
wwwwww
AMOUNT
6,124.81
177.21
202.65
38.69
14.05
432.60 *
100.00
100.00 *
356.40
53.90
333.60
743.90 *
487.50
487.50 *
74.75
74.75 *
100.00
100.00 *
100.00
100.00 *
265,709.33
35.00
5,251.00
9,709.76
535.00
9,944.00
8,798.43
817.26
17,948.35
9,880.31
6,754.02
108,051.26
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
W.W. GRAINGER
W.W. GRAINGER
W.W. GRAINGER
W.W. GRAINGER
WALTER JOHNSON
WATER PRODUCTS
WATER PRODUCTS
WATER PRODUCTS
WEST PHOTO
WEST WELD SUPPLY CO
WILLIAM WALSH
WROBLESKI -HENRY
FUND 10 TOTAL
FUND 11 TOTAL
FUND 12 TOTAL
FUND 23 TOTAL
FUND 25 TOTAL
FUND 27 TOTAL
FUND 28 TOTAL
FUND 29 TOTAL
FUND 30 TOTAL
FUND 40 TOTAL
FUND 41 TOTAL
FUND 50 TOTAL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SPLIT GEAR
TOOLS
REPAIR PARTS
POLICE SERVICES
11 -19 -90 PAGE 28
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 646 -64 9672
10- 4540 - 540 -54 9901
10- 4580 - 646 -64 1424
27- 4540- 664 -66 1679
10- 4100 - 430 -42
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 803 -80 175426 1478
REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540- 803 -80 177089 1141
REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 168144 1163'
PHOTOGRAPHIC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE SERVICES
POLICE SERVICES
GENERAL FUND
C.D.B.G.
COMMUNICATIONS
ART CENTER
CAPITAL FUND
GOLF COURSE FUND
RECREATION CENTER FUND
GUN RANGE FUND
EDINBOROUGH PARK
UTILITY FUND
STORM SEWER UTILITY
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
* ** -CKS
10- 4508 - 420 -42 5858 1625
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 560 -56 86772 1354
10- 4100 - 430 -42
10- 4100 - 430 -42
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -19 -90 PAGE 29
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
341,377.38 FUND 60 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION FUND
784,811.10 TOTAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
10 -31 -90 PAGE 1
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
274721
10/29/90
437.00
CITY /INVER GRV HTS
MUNICIPALS
10 =4206- 500 -50
MANUAL
437.00
ww *www
* ** —CKS
274F14
10/29/90
15,082.81
FIDELITY BANK
FICA
10- 41.49- 510 -51
MANUAL
274F14
10/29/90
972.70
FIDELITY BANK
MEDCARE
10= 4162 - 510 -51
MANUAL
e
16,055.51
wwwwww
* ** —CKS
275A82
10/29/90
28.20
AT &T
TELEPHONE
10- 4256- 510 -51
MANUAL
275A82
10/29/90
52.28
AT &T
TELEPHONE
10- 4256 - 622 -62
MANUAL -
275A82
10/29/90
2.85
AT &T
TELEPHONE
10- 4256 - 628 -62
MANUAL
83.33
wwwwww
* ** —CKS
275A84
10/29/90
9.50
AT &T
TELEPHONE
10- 4256- 510 -51
MANUAL
275A84
10/29/90
10.50
AT &T
TELEPHONE
50- 4256 - 821 -82
MANUAL
20.00 * '
wwwww*
* ** —CKS
275EII
10/29/90,
87.30
EAGLE WINE
BEER
50- 4630 - 842 -84.
MANUAL
&7.30
* *w * **
* ** —CKS
275E26
10/29/90
107.20
ED PHILLIPS
MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
MANUAL
275E26
10/29/90
47.00
ED PHILLIPS
MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
MANUAL
154.20
*ww * **
* ** —CKS
275P20
10/29/90
78.00 --
PAUSTIS & SONS
MIX
50- 4632- 842 -84
MANUAL
78.00
w *wwww
* ** —CKS
275P32
10/29/90
25,737.72
P.E.R.A.
PERA
10- 4145 - 510 -51
MANUAL,
25,737.72
*ww *ww
* ** —CKS
275P82
10/29/90
19.95
PRIOR WINE
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
275P82
10/29/90
61.21
PRIOR WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 822 -82
MANUAL
81.16
wwwwww
* ** —CKS
275U27
10/29/90
1,373.27•
US WEST
TELEPHONE
10- 4256 - 510 -51
MANUAL
27.5U27
10/29/90
180.89
US WEST
TELEPHONE
10- 4256- 622 -62
MANUAL
275U27
10/29/90
103.46
US WEST
TELEPHONE
10- 4256- 628 -62
MANUAL
275U27
10/29/90
31.40
US WEST
TELEPHONE
10- 4256 - 646 -64
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK
REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
275U27
10/29/90
50.68
US WEST
TELEPHONE
30- 4256 - 782 -78
275U27
10/29/90
141.92
US WEST
TELEPHONE
50- .4256- 821 -82
275U27
10/29/90
164.93
US WEST
TELEPHONE
50- 4256 - 841 -84
2,046.55
A
* * * * **
` 277P70
10/29/90
2,365.02
POSTMASTER
BULK /POSTAGE
12- 4215- 434 -43
2,365.02
* * * * *
278H83
10/29/90
110,000.00
HRA
TRANSFER
10- 1145 - 000 -00
110,000.00
278N16
10/29/90
1,057.03
NSP
POWER /LIGHT
10- 4252 - 301 -30 .
278N16
10/29/90
20,959.46
NSP
POWER /LIGHT
10- 4252 - 321 -30
278N16
10/29/90
3,505.38
NSP
POWER /LIGHT
10- 4252 - 322 -30
278N16
10/29/90
3,491.44
NSP
POWER /LIGHT
10- 4252 - 330 -30
278N16
10/29/90
2,282.53
NSP
POWER /LIGHT
10- 4252 - 375 -30
278N16
10/29/90
700.75
NSP
POWER /LIGHT
10- 4252 - 440 -44
278N16
10/29/90
47.18
NSP
POWER /LIGHT
10- 4252 - 460 -46
278N16
10/29/90
2,177.48
NSP
POWER /LIGHT
10- 4252 - 520 -52
278N16
10/29/90
2,483.61
NSP
POWER /LIGHT
10- 4252 - 540 -54
278N16
10/29/90
6,351.60
NSP
POWER /LIGHT
10- 4252 - 646 -64
278N16
10/29/90
756.97
NSP
POWER /LIGHT
23- 4252 - 612 -61
278N16
10/29/90
839.01
NSP
POWER /LIGHT
26- 4252 - 682 -68
278N16
10/29/90
652.22
NSP
POWER /LIGHT
27- 4252 - 662 -66
278N16
10/29/90
274.93
NSP
POWER /LIGHT
27- 4252 - 664 -66
278N16
10/29/90
587.64
NSP
POWER /LIGHT
27- 4252 - 667 -66
278N16
10/29/90
13,006.75
NSP
POWER /LIGHT
28- 4252 - 702 -70
278N16
10/29/90
262.56
NSP
POWER /LIGHT
29- 4252 - 722 -72
278N16
10/29/90
21.93
NSP
POWER /LIGHT
30- 4252 - 436 -42
278N16
10/29/90
9,631.54
NSP
POWER /LIGHT
30- 4252 - 782 -78
278N16
10/29/90
2,496.76
NSP
POWER /LIGHT
40- 4252 - 801 -80
278N16
10/29/90
40,984.08
NSP
POWER /LIGHT
40- 4252 - 803 -80
278N16
10/29/90
55.24
NSP
POWER /LIGHT
41 -4252- 902 -90
278N16
10/29/90
14.17
NSP
POWER /LIGHT
41- 4252 - 902 -90
278N16
10/29/90
862.49
NSP
POWER /LIGHT
50- 4252 - 821 -82
278N16
10/29/90
1,419.33
NSP
POWER /LIGHT
50- 4252 - 841 -84
278N16
10/29/90
685.94
NSP
POWER /LIGHT
50- 4252 - 861 -86
115,608.02
* * * * *
282C51
10/29/90
76.71
COMM /REV
SALES TAX
10- 3357 - 000 -00
282C51
10/29/90
206.64
COMM /REV
SALES TAX
23- 3357 - 000 -00
282C51
10/29/90
79.45
COMM /REV
-SALES TAX
26- 3357 - 000 -00
282C51
10/29/90
9,388.44
COMM /REV
SALES TAX
27- 3357-000 -00
282C51
10/29/90
566.99
COMM /REV
SALES TAX
28- 3357 - 000 -00
282C51
10/29/90
142.39
COMM /REV
SALES TAX
29- 3357 - 000 -00
282C51
10/29/90
141.11
COMM /REV
SALES TAX
30- 3357 - 000 -00
282C51
10/29/90
1,891.56
COMM /REV
SALES TAX
40- 3357 - 000 -00
10 -31 -90 PAGE 2
# P.O. # MESSAGE
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
10 -31 -90 PAGE 3
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
282C51
10/29/90
7,108.13
COMM /REV
SALES TAX'
50- 3357- 000 -00
MANUAL
282C51
10/29/90
7,108.13-
COMM /REV
SALES TAX
50- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
282C51
10/29/90
7,108.13
COMM /REV
SALES TAX
50- 3357 - 001 -00
MANUAL
282C51
10/29/90
12,240.36
COMM /REV
SALES TAX
50- 3357- 002 -00
MANUAL
282C51
10/29/90
13,257.78
COMM /REV
SALES TAX
50 -3357- 003 -00
MANUAL
45,099.56
kkkk
* ** -CKS
282E11
11/05/90
3.07-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
282E11
11/05/90
1.63-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
282E11
11/05/90
3.08-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
282EII
11/05/90
6.34-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
282E11
11/05/90
2.74-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
282E11
11/05/90
5.39-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
282EII
11/05/90
306.73
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
282E11
11/05/90
162.85
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
282E11
11/05/90
634.34
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
282E11
11/05/90
307.59
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
282EII
11/05/90
539.08.
EAGLE WINE
50 =4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
282E11
11/05/90
274.20
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
282E11
10/29/90
87.30
EAGLE WINE.
BEER
50- 4630 - 862 -86
MANUAL
282EII
10/29/90
8.17
EAGLE WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 862 -86
MANUAL
2,298.01
k * *k **
* ** -CKS
282E26
11/05/90
17.79-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
282E26
.11/05/90
1.46-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
282E26
11/05/90
9.30-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
282E26
11/05/90
1.49-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
282E26
11/05/90
3.12-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
282E26
11/05/90
20.82-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
282E26
11/05/90
889.78
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
282E26
11/05/90
465.31
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
282E26
11/05/90
73.16
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
282E26
11/05/90
74.69
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
282E26
11/05/90
1,041.03
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
282E26
11/05/90
156.36
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
282E26
11/05/90
29.50
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
282E26
11/05/90
292.95
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
282E26
11/05/90
1,667.55
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
282E26
11/05/90
420.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
282E26
11/05/90
489.05
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
282E26
11/05/90
408.53
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
282E26
11/05/90
624.45
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 =84
MANUAL
282E26
11/05/90
561.95
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
282E26
11/05/90
1,042.55
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
282E26
11/05/90
631.01
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
282E26
11/05/90
541.95
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL,
282E26
10/29/90
66.90
ED PHILLIPS
BEER
50- 4630 - 862 -86
MANUAL
9,422.74
kkk -CKS
282G82
11/05/90
17.46-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 822 -82
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
10 -31 -90 PAGE 4
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
282682
11/05/90
17.46-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3700 - 822 -82
MANUAL
_...39 -13 ---
- -- GRIGGS-
800PE.R.. - - -- - - -- ..•._ .. .. ..... ....._.........
-..50- 3700 - 842 -84
_.. .....- .__........._. MANUAL
282G82
11/05/9.0
14.88-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3700 - 862 -86
MANUAL
282682
11/05/90
22.08=
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3700 - 862 -86
MANUAL
282G82
11/05/90
9.00-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 822 -82-
MANUAL
282G82
11/05/90
41.90-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
82G82
11/05/90
5.27.-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
82G82
11/05/90.
2.84-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
282G82
11/05/90
79.00-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
282G82
11/05/90
1.42-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
282G82
11/05/90
2.96-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
282082
11/05/90
1.42-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
282082
11/05/90
9.61-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
282G82
11/05/90
89.11-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
282G82
11/05/90
13.73-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
282G82
11/05/90
449.86
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
282G82
11/05/90
2,094.76
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
282G82
11/05/90
3,950.07
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
282G82
11/05/90.
141.80
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
282G82
11/05/90
147.96
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
282G82
11/05/90
71.24
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
282G82
11/05/90
263:60
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
282G82
11/05/90.
4,455.62
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
282682
11/05/90
71.24
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
282682
11/05/90
480.37
GRIGGS.
COOPER
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
282G82
11/05/90
686.50
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
282G82
11/05/90
.00
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
282G82
11/05/90
.00
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 46.28- 822 -82
MANUAL
282G82
11/05/90
.00
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
282G82
11/05/90
503.79-
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
282G82
11/05/90
.00
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
282682
11/05/90
.00
GRIGGS
COOPER
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
11,981.09
* * * * **
* * * -CKS
282J62
11/05/90
39.13-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3700 - 842 -84
MANUAL
282J62
11/05/90
5.86-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
282J62
11/05/90
5.86
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
282J62-
11/05/90
4.05-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
282J62
11/05/90
35.77-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
282J62
11/05/90
5.86-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
282J62
11/05/90
79.62-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
282J62
11/05/90
16.34-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
282J62
11/05/90
8.74-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
282J62
11/05/90
81.52 -
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
282J62
11/05/90
7.87-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
282J62
11/05/90
7.85-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
282J62
11/05/90
9.44
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
282J62
11/05/90
1,788.93
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
282J62
11/05/90
28.32
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
282J62
11/05/90
8.50-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
282J62
11/05/90 -
3,982.14
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
282J62
11/05/90
4,075.31
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 962 -86
MANUAL
282J62
11/05/90
25.83
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
282J62
11/05/90
282J62
11/05/90
282J62
11/05/90
282J62
11/05/90
282J62
11/05/90
282J62
11/05/90
z82J62
11/05/90
282J62
11/05/90
282J62
11/05/90
282362
11/05/90
282J62
11/05/90
282J62
11/05/90
282J62
11/05/90
282J62
11/05/90
282J62
11/05/90
282J62
11/05/90
282J62
11/05/90
AMOUNT
404.45
585.63
59.2.71
7.08
11.80
592.71-
25.37
47.21 -
15.34
870.74
6.46-
.00
1,633.54
24.19
783.94
786.66
10.03
14,719.82
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR
JOHNSON WINE
JOHNSON WINE
JOHNSON WINE
JOHNSON WINE
JOHNSON WINE
JOHNSON WINE
JOHNSON WINE
JOHNSON WINE
JOHNSON WINE
JOHNSON WINE
JOHNSON WINE
JOHNSON WINE
JOHNSON WINE
JOHNSON WINE
JOHNSON WINE
JOHNSON WINE
JOHNSON WINE
* * * * **
282P70 10/29/90 650.00 POSTMASTER
650.00.*
* * * * **
11/05/90
5.96-
QUALITY
WINE
282P82
11/05/90
1.60-
PRIOR
WINE
282P82
11/05/90
.44-
PRIOR
WINE.
28.2P82
11/05/90
2.32-
PRIOR
WINE
282P82
11/05/90
4.29-
PRIOR
WINE
282P82
11/05/90
4.78-
PRIOR
WINE
282P82
11/05/90
3.39-
PRIOR
WINE
282P82
11/05/90
.1.75-
PRIOR
WINE
282P82
11/05/90
2.97-
PRIOR
WINE
282P82
11/05/90
43.75
PRIOR
WINE
282P82
11/05/90
232.41
PRIOR
WINE
282P82
11/05/90
159.88
PRIOR
WINE
282P82
11/05/90
477.69
PRIOR
WINE
282P82
11/05/90
429.35
PRIOR
WINE
282P82
11/05/90
296.92
PRIOR
WINE
282P82
11/05/90
175.00
PRIOR
WINE
282P82
11/05/90
338.50
PRIOR
WINE
2,131.96
* * * * **
ITEM DESCRIPTION
POSTAGE
ACCOUNT NO. INV
50- 4628- 822 -82
50- 4628 - 822 -82
50- 4628 - 822 -82
'50- 4628 - 822 -82
50- 4628 - 822 -82
50- 4628 - 822 -82
50- 4628 - 842 -84
50- 4628 - 842 -84
50- 4628 - 842 -84
50- 4628 - 842 -84
50- 4628 - 842 -84
50- 4628 - 842 -84
50- 4628 - 842 -84
50- 4628 - 862 -86
50- 4628 - 862 -86
50- 4628 - 862 -86
50- 4628 - 862 -86
10- 4290 - 510 -51
50- 3710 - 822 -82
50- 3710 - 822 -82
50- 3710 - 822 -82
50- 3710 - 842 -84
50- 3710 - 842 -84
50- 3710 - 862 -86
50- 3710 - 862 -86
50- 3710 - 862 -86
50- 4628- 822 -82
50- 4628 - 822 -82
50- 4628 - 822 -82
50- 4628 - 842 -84
50- 4628 - 842 -.84
50- 4628 - 862 -86
50- 4628- 862 -86
50- 4628 - 862 -86
282Q16
11/05/90
5.96-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
282Q16
11/05/90
12.24-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
282Q16
11/05/90
3.54-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
282Q16
11/05/90
14.48-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
282016
11/05/90
29.95-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
282Q16
11/05/90
1.17-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
282Q16
11/05/90
42.34-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
282Q16
11/05/90
.78-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 =86
282Q16
11/05/90
5'.16
-
QUALI-TY
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
10 -31 -90 PAGE 5
# P.O. # MESSAGE
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
10 -31 -90 PAGE 6
ACCOUNT N0. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
50- 3710-862 -86
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
MANUAL
CHECK REGISTER
MANUAL
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
282Q16
11/05/90
55.68-
QUALITY WINE
MANUAL
282Q16
11/05/90
7.54-
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
282Q16
11/05/90
611.92
QUALITY WINE
MANUAL
282Q16
11/05/90
2,116.73
QUALITY WINE
282Q16
11/05/90
177.24
QUALITY WINE
* ** -CKS
282Q16
11/05/90
258.16
QUALITY WINE
282Q16-
10/29/90
31.65
QUALITY WINE
DEBIT ADJUST
282Q16
11/05/90
2,782.43
QUALITY WINE
282Q16
11/05/90
595.05
QUALITY WINE
MANUAL
282Q16
11/05/90
1,445.65
QUALITY WINE
282Q16
11/05/90
2,992.30
QUALITY WINE
MANUAL
282Q16
11/05/90
116.85
QUALITY WINE
282Q16
11/05/90
752.85
QUALITY WINE -
282Q16
11/05/90
77.90
QUALITY WINE
282Q16
10/29/90
.01
QUALITY WINE
MIX
11,779.90
* * * * **
282T22
11/05/90
80.10
THE WINE COMPANY
* * * **
80.10
*
283M98
11/07/90
3,706.31
MINNEGASCO
GAS
t
3,706.31
* * * * **
284700
10/29/90
198._00
MN DEPT %NATL RES
CERTIFICATION
198.00
* * * * **
284C30
10/29/90
121.80
CITY BEER DIST
BEER
284C30
10/29/90
34.60
CITY BEER DIST
BEER,
156.40
284K57
10/29/90
2,496.40
KUETHER DIST
BEER
284K57
10/29/90
4,477.45-
KUETHER DIST
BEER
6,973.85
* * * * **
284M63
10/29/90
173.00
MN BAR SUPPLY
MIX
173.00
* * * * **
284N16
10/29/90
6,269.51
NSP
POWER /LIGHT
284N16
10/29/90
7.06
NSP
POWER /LIGHT
6,276.57
10 -31 -90 PAGE 6
ACCOUNT N0. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
50- 3710-862 -86
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL -
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86'
MANUAL
50- 4632 - 862 -86
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
30- 425.2- 436 -42
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 3500 - 000 -00
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50- 4630 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4630- 862 -86
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50- 4630 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4630 - 842 -84
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50- 4632 - 862 -86
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
27- 4252 - 662 -66
MANUAL
41- 4252 - 902 -90
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
28030
10/29/90
284P30
10/29/90
�84R33
10/29/90
284R33
10/29/90
* * * * **
50- 4632 - 822 -82
284T13
10/29/90
* * * * **
285716
10/29/90
•285717
10/29/90
285717
10/29/90
285717
1.0/29/90
* * * * **
285A82
10/29/90
285A82
10/29/90
285A82
10/29/90
285A82
10/29/90
" 285A83
10/29/90
285A84
10/29/90
* * * * **
MANUAL
285C33
10/29/90
285C33
10/29/90
* * * * **
285M98
10/29/90
285M98
10/29/90
285M98
10/29/90
285M98
10/29/90
285M98
10/29/90
285M98
10/29/90
285M98
10/29/90
CHECK
REGISTER
10 -31 -90 PAGE 7
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
161.11
PEPSI
MIX
50- 4632 - 822 -82
MANUAL
261.74
PEPSI
MIX
50- 4632 - 862 -86
MANUAL
422.85
* ** -CKS
5,233.00
REX DIST CO
BEER
50- 4630 - 822 -82
MANUAL
4,876.70
REX DIST CO.
BEER
50- 4630 - 862 -86
MANUAL
10,109.70
* ** -CKS
750.00
TOM HORWATH
FORESTRY
10- 4201 - 644 -64
MANUAL
750.00
* ** -CKS
30.00
LMHRC
REGISTRATION
10- 4280 - 504 -50
MANUAL
30.00
25.00
HOLIDAY EXPO 90
ANNUAL CONFERENCE
50- 4202 - 820 -82
MANUAL
100.00
HOLIDAY EXPO 90
ANNUAL CONFERENCE
50- 4202 - 840 -84
MANUAL
75.00
HOLIDAY EXPO 90
ANNUAL CONFERENCE
50- 4202 - 860 -86
MANUAL
200.00
* ** -CKS
2.59
AT &T
TELEPHONE
10- 4256 - 510 -51
MANUAL
2.47
AT &T
TELEPHONE
23- 4256 - 612 -61
MANUAL
6.31
AT &T
TELEPHONE
30- 4256 - 782 -78
MANUAL
.40
AT &T
TELEPHONE
50- 4256- 861 -86
MANUAL.
11.77 *
96.29
AT &T
TELEPHONE
10- 4256 - 510 -51
MANUAL
96.29 *
15.30
AT &T
TELEPHONE
10- 4256- 510 -51
MANUAL
15.30 *
* ** -CKS
128,000.00 -
CITY /EDINA
PAYROLL TRANSFER
50- 1010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
128,000.00
CITY /EDINA
PAYROLL TRANSFER
50- 1010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
.00
* ** -CKS
77.71
US WEST
TELEPHONE
10- 4256 - 436 -42
MANUAL
2,564.61
US WEST
TELEPHONE
10- 4256- 510 -51
MANUAL
247.55
US WEST
TELEPHONE
10- 4256 - 622 -62
MANUAL
64.90
US WEST
TELEPHONE
10- 4256 - 646 -64
MANUAL
167.15
US WEST
TELEPHONE
23- 4256 - 612 -61
MANUAL
404.84
US WEST
TELEPHONE
27- 4256 - 662 -66
MANUAL
90.69
US WEST
TELEPHONE
27- 4256 = 664 -66
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
10 -31-80 PAGE, 8
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
285M98
10/29/90
197.82•
US WEST
TELEPHONE
28- 4256 - 702 -70
MANUAL
285M98
10/29/90
47.23
US WEST
TELEPHONE
29- 4256- 722 -72
MANUAL
285M98
10/25/90
85.32
US WEST
TELEPHONE.
.40- 4256 - 801 -80
MANUAL
285M98
10/29/90
576.28
US WEST
TELEPHONE
40- 4256 - 803 -80
MANUAL
285M98
10/29/90
16.06
US WEST
TELEPHONE
50- 4256_ 821 -82
MANUAL
285M98
10/29/90
'16.06
US WEST
TELEPHONE
50- 4256 - 841 -84
MANUAL
285M98
10/29/90
174.54
US WEST
TELEPHONE
50- 4256 - 861 -86
MANUAL
4,730.76
* ** -CKS
285P32
10/29/90
97.94
P.E.R.A.
PERA
10- 4145 - 510 -51
MANUAL
97.94
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
289718
10/29/90
59.95
POLAROID SERV CTR
EQUIP MAINT
10- 4274 - 420 -42
MANUAL
59.95
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
289EII
11/05/90
.46-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
289E11
11/05/90
6.23-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
289E11
11/05/90
2.28-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
289E11
11/05/90
3.18-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
289EII
11/05/90
3.52-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
289EII
11/05/90
1.33-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
289E11
11/05/90
622.91
EAGLE WINE
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
289EII
11/05/90
45.99
EAGLE WINE
`50-4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
289E11
11/05/90
228.00
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
289E11
11/05/90
317.94
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
- 289EII
11/05/90
133.10
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
289EII
11/05/90
352.32
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
1,683.26
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
289E26
11/05/90
7.21-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
289E26
11/05/90
2.39 -
_
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
289E26
11/05/90
12.35-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -.84
MANUAL
289E26
11/05/90
4.65-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
289E26
11/05/90
8.17-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
289E26
11/05/90
360.76
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
289E26
11/05/90
119.94
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
289E26
11/05/90
617.79
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
289E26
11/05/90
408.92
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
289E26
11/05/90
232.75
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
289E26
11/05/90
483.45
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
289E26
11/05/90
347..95
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
289E26
11/05/90
758.40
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
289E26
11/05/90
585.35
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
289E26
11/05/90
360.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
289E26
11/05/90
691.17
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
289E26
11/05/90
908.05
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
289E26
11/05/90
418.25
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV
289E26
11/05/90
478.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
6,736.01
289F14
10/29/90
14,490.94
FIDELITY BANK FICA
10- 4149 - 510 -51
289F14
10/29/90
752.11
FIDELITY BANK MEDICARE
10- 4162 - 510 -51
15,243.05
* * * * **
289G82
11/05/90
15.15-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 822 -82
289G82
11/05/90
30.40-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 842 -84
289G82
11/05/90
44.40-
GRIGGS COOPER
50 =3700- 862 -86
289G82
11/05/90
36.56-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 822 -82
289G82
11/05/90
40.89-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 822 -82
289G82
11/05/90
75.88-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
289G82
11/05/90
115.22-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
289G82
11/05/90
87.99-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 862 -86
289G82
11/05/90
64.07-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710- 862 -86
289G82
11/05/90
1,828.12
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626- 822 -82
289G82
11/05/90
2,044.36
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 822 -82
289G82
11/05/90.
3,794.10
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
289G82
11/05/90
5,760.90
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
289G82
11/05/90
3,203.51
GRIGGS COOPER
50 -4626- 862 -86
289G82
11/05/90
4,399.34
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626- 862 -86
289G82
11/05/90
.00
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 822 -82
289G82
11/05/90
.00
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 842 -84
289G82
11/05/90
.00
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 862 -86
20,519.77
* * * * **
289J62
11/05/90
1.95-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
289J62
11/05/90
8.50-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
289J62
11/05/90
61.19-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
289J62
11/05/90
.25-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
289J62
11/05/90
6.52-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
289362
11/05/90
5.64-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
289J62
11/05/90
94.41-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
289J62
11/05/90
83.09-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
289J62
11/05/90
6.10-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
289J62
11/05/90
.75-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
289J62
11/05/90
6.06-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
289J62
11/05/90
3,058.27
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626- 822 -82
289J62
11/05/90
19.18
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
289J62
11/05/90
4,720.63
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
289J62
11/05/90
33.64
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
289J62
11/05/90
4,155.14
_
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
289J62
11/05/90
26.27
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626- 862 -86
289J62
11/05/90
5.90
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
289J62
11/05/90
10.62
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
289J62
11/05/90
24.91
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
289J62
11/05/90
.59
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
289J62
11/05/90
850.86
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
10 -31 -90 PAGE 9
# P.O. # MESSAGE
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL,'
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* * * * ** * ** -CKS
289P32
10/29/90
26,091.23
P.E.R.A. PERA
10- 4145 - 510 -51
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
* * * * **
CHECK REGISTER
10 -31 -90 'PAGE 10
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
11/05/90
VENDOR ITEM-DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
289J62
11/05/90
194.64
2.34-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
289J62
11/05/90
10.62
50- 3710 - 842 -84
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
289362
11/05/90
17.70
289P82
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
289J62
11/05/90
560.96
445.27
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
289J62
11/05/90
651.31
50- 4628- 842 -84
JOHNSON
WINE
50- .4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
289J62
11/05/90
74.73
289P82
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
89J62
11/05/90
17.11
310.11
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
.89J62
11/05/90
604.92
50- 4632- 822 -82
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
289J62
11/05/90
610.41
* * * * **
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
289J62
11/05/90
1.77
.22-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
289J62
11/05/90
7.08
50- 3710 - 822 -82
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
15,382.80
-*
11/05/90
33.42-
QUALITY WINE
50 -3710- 842 -84
* * * * **
289Q16
11/05/90
4.82-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
289N16
10/29/90
62.67
50- 3710- 862 -86
NSP
POWER /LIGHT
40 -4252- 801 -80
MANUAL
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
62.67.*
289Q16
11/05/90
3.63-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
* * * * ** * ** -CKS
289P32
10/29/90
26,091.23
P.E.R.A. PERA
10- 4145 - 510 -51
MANUAL
26,091.23
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
289P82
11/05/90
4.45-
PRIOR'WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
289P82
11/05/90
2.34-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
289P82
11/05/90
1.11-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
289P82
11/05/90
.39-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
289P82
11/05/90
3.10-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
289P82
11/05/90
445.27
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
289P82
11/05/90
233.77
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
289P82
11/05/90
39.29
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
289P82
11/05/90
110.55
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
289P82'
11/05/90
310.11
PRIOR WINE-
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
289P82
10/29/90
18.76
PRIOR WINE MIX
50- 4632- 822 -82
MANUAL
1,146.36
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
289Q16
11/05/90
.22-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
289Q16
11/05/90
6.73-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
289Q16
11/05/90
25.38-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
289Q16
11/05/90
33.42-
QUALITY WINE
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
289Q16
11/05/90
4.82-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
289Q16
11/05/90
7.97-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
289Q16
11/05/90
.66-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
289Q16
11/05/90
3.63-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
289Q16
11/05/90
49.40-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
289Q16
11/05/90
1,268.57
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
289Q16
11/05/90
1,671.36
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
289Q16
11/05/90
2,468.50
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
289Q16
11/05/90
670.90
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL,
289Q16
11/05/90
21.95
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
289Q16
11/05/90
481.55
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
600,000.00
EAGLE
CHECK
REGISTER
10- 1145 - 000 -00
10 -31 -90 PAGE 11
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
*
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. .
#-P.O. # MESSAGE
289Q16
11/05/90
3.59-
.10
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
289Q16
11/05/90
795.30
EAGLE
QUALITY WINE
POSTAGE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
289Q16
11/05/90
362.50
*
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
289Q16
11/05/90
65.85
EAGLE
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
289Q16
10/29/90
3.64
.02
QUALITY WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296A82
10/29/90
7,674.37
EAGLE
AT &T
TELEPHONE
27- 4256- 662 -66
MANUAL
296A82
10/29/90
12.14
EAGLE.WINE
AT &T
TELEPHONE
27- 4256 - 664 -66
* ** -CKS
291873
10/29/90
16.28
EAGLE
GC PETTY CASH
TEMP SALARY
27- 4120 - 663 -66
MANUAL
291B73
10/29/90
20.84
.95
GC PETTY CASH
SCHOOL
27- 4202 - 661 -66
MANUAL
291873
10/29/90
25.00
EAGLE
GC PETTY CASH
POSTAGE
27- 4290 - 661 -66
MANUAL
291873
10/29/90
14.00
EAGLE
GC PETTY CASH
MIKE CORD
27- 4504 - 661 -66
MANUAL
291B73
10/29/90
21.52
EAGLE
GC PETTY CASH
GENERAL SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 663 -66
MANUAL
291B73
10/29/90
139.96
EAGLE
GC PETTY CASH
COST /GOODS SOLD
27- 4624 - 663 -66
MANUAL
296EII
10/29/90
237.60
EAGLE
WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 862 -86
MANUAL
* * * * ** * ** -CKS
295H83
10/29/90
600,000.00
EAGLE
HRA
TRANSFER
10- 1145 - 000 -00
MANUAL
296E11
11/05/90
600,000.00
*
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
* * * * **
11/05/90
3.59-
EAGLE
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
* ** -CKS
295P70
10/29/90
195.00
EAGLE
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE
10- 4290 - 510 -51
MANUAL
296EII
11/05/90
195.00
*
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
* * * * **
11/05/90
.23-
EAGLE
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
* ** -CKS
296A82
10%29/90
3.64
EAGLE
AT &T
TELEPHONE
10- 4256 - 510 -51
MANUAL
296A82
10/29/90
57.85
EAGLE
AT &T
TELEPHONE
27- 4256- 662 -66
MANUAL
296A82
10/29/90
12.14
EAGLE.WINE
AT &T
TELEPHONE
27- 4256 - 664 -66
MANUAL
296A82
10/29/90
22.73
EAGLE
AT &T
TELEPHONE
28- 4256- 702 -70
MANUAL
296A82
10/29/90
658.32
.95
AT &T
TELEPHONE
40- 4256 - 803 -80
MANUAL
296E11
11/05/90
97.31
EAGLE
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
* * * * ** * ** -CKS
296E11
11/05/90
.46-
EAGLE
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
296E11
11/05/90
3.12-
EAGLE
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
296EII
11/05/90
3.59-
EAGLE
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296EII
11/05/90
.27-
EAGLE
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296EII
11/05/90
6.58-
EAGLE
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296EII
11/05/90
.23-
EAGLE
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296E11
11/05/90
45.99
EAGLE
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
296EII
11/05/90
312.19
EAGLE
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
296EII
11/05/90
26.55
EAGLE.WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL -
296E11
11/05/90
358.94
EAGLE
WINE
50 =4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
296E11
11/05/90
658.32
EAGLE
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296E11
11/05/90
22.95
EAGLE
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296E11
10/29/90
87.30
EAGLE
WINE
BEER
50- 4630- 822 -82
MANUAL
296EII
10/29/90
143.58
EAGLE
WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 822 -82
MANUAL
296EII
10/29/90
264.70
EAGLE
WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296EII
10/29/90
182.40
EAGLE
WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 862 -86
MANUAL
2,088.67
1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10 -31 -90 PAGE 12
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
** -CKS
296E26.
11/05/90
1.25-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
296E26
11/05/90
25.84-
ED PHILLIPS
.50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296E26
11/05/90
9.31-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296E26
11/05/90
9.11-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296E26
11/05/90
4.69-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296E26
11/05/90
18.58
-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296E26
11/05/90
62.53
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
296E26
11/05/90
465.69
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 842 -84'
MANUAL'
296E26
11/05/90
1,292.06
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
296E26
11/05/90
455.53
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296E26
11/05/90
929.07
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
296E26
11/05/90
234.96
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296E26
11/05/90
665.95
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
296E26
11/05/90
361.90
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
296E26
11/05/90
400.43
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
296E26
11/05/90
1,478.40
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
296E26
11/05/90
58.94
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
296E26
11/05/90-
331.74
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 =84
- MANUAL
296E26
11/05/90
441.95
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296E26
11/05/90
91.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296E26
11/05/90
694.38
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296E26
11/05/90
437.95
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
296E26
11/05/90
885.05
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296E26
10/29/90
106.05
ED PHILLIPS BEER
50- 4630 = 842 -84
MANUAL
296E26
10/29/90
45.45
ED PHILLIPS BEER
50 -4630- 862 -86
MANUAL
296E26
10/29/90
32.20
ED PHIILIPS MIX
50- 4632- 822 -82
MANUAL
9,402.45
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
296G82
11/05/90
10.84-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 822 -82
MANUAL
296G82
11/05/90
15.34-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296G82
11/05/90
6.00-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296G82
11/05/90
28.51-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296G82
11/05/90
21.85-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
296G82
11/05/90
1.84-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296G82
11/05/90
118.01-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296G82
11/05/90
5.75-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296G82
11/05/90
40.27-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296G82
11/05/90
5.75-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296G82
11/05/90
1,092.50
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
296G82
11/05/90
287.64
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296G82
11/05/90
5,900.67
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296G82
11/05/90
91.87
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
296G82
11/05/90
287.64
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296G82
11/05/90
2,013.37
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296G82
11/05/90
..00
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
296G82
11/05/90
.00
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296G82
11/05/90
.00
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 842 -.84
MANUAL
296G82
11/05/90
13.77-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296G82
11/05/90
23.70-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296682
11/05/90
.00
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
10 -31 -90 PAGE 13
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
9,382.06
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
296J62
11/05/90
26.83-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
.85-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
z96J62
11/05/90
4.57-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 782
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
1.82-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
.17-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
1.61-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
2.14-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
153.94-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
2.54-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
.86-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
5.17-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
1.54-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
6.91-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
61.83-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
.91-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
1,342.01
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
7.97
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
7,697.77
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
49.27
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
20.51
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
3,092.96
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
457.18
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
84.70
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
5.31
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
180.77
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 462.8- 822 -82
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
.59
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
4.72
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
1.18
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
17.30
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
254.10
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
211.84
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
2.36
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
5.90
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
3.54
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
2.95
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 7842 -84
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90.
161.19,
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84.
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
86.50
JOHNSON,
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
154.98
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
5.31
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
14.75
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
91.20
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
1.18
JOHNSON
WINE.
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
8.26
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
689.82
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296J62
11/05/90
514.34
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
14,898.77
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
29020
11/05/90
3.00
PAUSTIS
& SONS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
296P20
11/05/90
108.90
PAUSTIS
& SONS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
I
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
10- 31 -90- PAGE 14
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
296P20
11105/90
105.45
PAUSTIS & SONS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296P20
11/05/90
3.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296P20
11/05/90
296.15
PAUSTIS & SONS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296P20
11/05/90
6.40
PAUSTIS & SONS
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
296P20
10/,29/90
26.50
PAUSTIS & SONS
MIX
50- 4632 - 822 -82
MANUAL
296P20
10/29/90
26.50
PAUSTIS & SONS
MIX
50- 4632 - 862 -86
MANUAL
575.90
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
296P82
11/05/90
3.78-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
296P82
11/05/90
4.29-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296P82
11/05/90
6.15-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296P82
11/05/90
377.58
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
296P82
11/05/90
429.48
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296P82
11/05/90
615.33
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296P82
10/29/90
61:21
PRIOR WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
MANUAL
1,469.38
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
296Q16
11/05/90
7.90-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
296Q16
11/05/90
5.83
-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
296Q16
11/05/90
10.63-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
296Q16
11/05/90
29.18-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296Q16
11/05/90
4.35-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296Q16
11/05/90
90.45-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296Q16
11/05/90
.78-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296Q16
11/05/90
9.03-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
296Q16
11/05/90
14.92-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296Q16
11/05/90
.65.82-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296Q16
11/05/90
291.82
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
296Q16
11/05/90
530.69
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
296Q16
11/05/90
1,459.10
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296Q16
11/05/90
4,521.96
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296Q16
11/05/90
3;290.84
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
296Q16
11/05/90
746.38
-
QUALITY WINE
50 -4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
296Q16
11/05/90
788.25
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
296Q16
11/05/90
433.65
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
296Q16
11/05/90
901.60
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
296Q16
11/05/90
77.90
QUALITY -WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
12,803.30
* ** -CKS
296T49
11/05/90
93.27
TOW DISTRIBUTING
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
93.27
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
296U27
10/29/90
15.98
US' WEST
TELEPHONE
10- 4256 - 436 -42
MANUAL
296U27
10/29/90
343.96
US WEST
'TELEPHONE
10- 4256 - 510 -51
MANUAL
296U27
10/29/90
115.09
US WEST
TELEPHONE
10- 4256- 622 -62
MANUAL
296U27
10/29/90
21.53
US WEST
TELEPHONE
10- 4256- 628 -62
MANUAL
296U27
10/29/90
29.20
US WEST
TELEPHONE
10- 4256 - 646 -64
MANUAL
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
296U27
10/29/90
296U27
10/29/90
296U27
10/29/90
296U27
10/29/90
190.40
US
297788
10/29/90
* * * * **
US
299C33
10/29/90
299C33
10/29/90
* * * * **
302G86
11/07/90
65:52
US
302M24
11/07/90
* * * * **
ED PHILLIPS
302P42
11/07/90
* * * * **
ED PHILLIPS
303E11
11/05/90
303E11
11/05/90
303E'11
11/05/90
303E11
11/05/90
303E11
11/05/90
303EII
11/05/90
* * * * **
303E26
11/05/90
303E26
11/05/90
303E26
11/05/90
303E26
11/05/90
303E26
11/05/90
303E26
11/05/90
303E26
11/05/90
303E26
11/05/90
303E26
11/05/90
303E26
11/05/90
303E26
11/05/90
110.00 •FORSYTHE RECOG EVENT MTG EXPENSE
110.00
140,000.00 CITY /EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER
140,000.00- CITY /EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER
.00
14,318.97 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE
14,318.97
16,129.80 MEDCENTERS INSURANCE
16,129.80 *
21,498.50 PHP INSURANCE
21,498.50 *
3.44-
EAGLE WINE
CHECK REGISTER
EAGLE WINE
AMOUNT
EAGLE WINE
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
190.40
US
WEST
TELEPHONE
98.82
US
WEST
TELEPHONE
931.83
US
WEST
TELEPHONE
65:52
US
WEST
TELEPHONE
1,812.33
ED PHILLIPS
1.49-
ED PHILLIPS -
110.00 •FORSYTHE RECOG EVENT MTG EXPENSE
110.00
140,000.00 CITY /EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER
140,000.00- CITY /EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER
.00
14,318.97 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE
14,318.97
16,129.80 MEDCENTERS INSURANCE
16,129.80 *
21,498.50 PHP INSURANCE
21,498.50 *
3.44-
EAGLE WINE
1.11-
EAGLE WINE
7.61-
EAGLE WINE
344.49
EAGLE WINE .
111.15
EAGLE WINE
760.86
EAGLE WINE
1,204.34
* ** -CKS
1.32-
ED- PHILLIPS
11.89-
ED PHILLIPS
21.68-
ED PHILLIPS
1.70-
ED PHILLIPS
21.68-
ED PHILLIPS
1.49-
ED PHILLIPS
1.49-
ED PHILLIPS -
8.13-
ED PHILLIPS
19.22-
ED PHILLIPS
594.93
ED PHILLIPS
1,084.00
ED PHILLIPS
10 -31 -90 PAGE 15
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
27- 4256- 667 -66
MANUAL
28- 4256 - 702 -70
MANUAL
30- 4256- 782 -78
MANUAL
30- 4256 - 784 -78
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
12- 4206 - 434 -43
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50- 1010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
50- 1010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4156 - 510 -51
r .
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4156- 510 -51
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
10- 4156 - 510 -51
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL _
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84"
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK
REGISTER
10 -31 -90 PAGE 16
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
303E26
11/05/90
85.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
303E26
11/05/90
1,084.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
303E26
11/05/90
74.97
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
303E26
11/05/90
406.50
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
303E26
11/05/90
961.21
ED.PHILLIPS
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
303E261
11/05/90
74.69
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
103E26
11/05/90
941.33
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
303E26
11/05/90
91.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
303E26
11/05/90
184.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
303E26
11/05/90
567.50
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
303E26
11/05/90
66.10
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
303E26
11/05/90
399.16
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
303E26
11/05/90
211.95
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
303E26,
11/05/90
290.90
ED .PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
303E26
11/05/90
1,314.61
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
303E26
11/05/90
425.95
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
303E26
11/05/90
737.70
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
303E26
11/07/90
37.50
ED PHILLIPS
BEER
50- 4630 - 842 -84
MANUAL
303E26
11/07/90
37.50
ED PHILLIPS
BEER
50- 4630 - 862 -86'
MANUAL
9,581.90
* *'* -CKS
303G82
11/05/90
4.11-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3700 - 822 -82
MANUAL
303G82
11/05/90
22.84-
GRIGGS COOPER
50 -3700- 862 =86
MANUAL
303G82
11/05/90
37.57-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
303G82
11/05/90
34.80-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
303G82
11/05/90
5.75-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
303G82
11/05/90
84.83-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
303G82
11/05/90
.5.75-
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
303G82
11/05/90
1,878.47
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
303G82
11/05/90
287.64
GRIGGS COOPER
-50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
303G82
11/05/90
1,740.09
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
303682
11/05/90
4,241.69
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
303G82
11/05/90
287.64
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
303G82
11/05/90
.00
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
303G82
11/05/90
.00
GRIGGS COOPER
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
8,239.88
303H83
11/07/90
50,000.00
HRA
TRANSFER
10- 1145 - 000 -00
MANUAL
50,000.00
* * * * **
*. ** -CKS
303J62
11/05/90
6.00-
_
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3700 - 822 -82
MANUAL
303J62
11/05/90
17.75-
JOHNSON WINE
5073700 - 842 -84
MANUAL
303J62
11/05/90
12.25-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3700 - 862 -86
MANUAL
303J62
11/05/90
2.02-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
303J62
11/05/90
3.91-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
303J62
11/05/90
53.07-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
303J62
11/05/90
3.77-
JOHNSON.WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
303J62
11/05/90
3.57-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
303J62
11/05/90
69.31-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
303J62
11/05/90
7.36-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
303J62
11/05/90
1.19-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86,
MANUAL
1990 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK
REGISTER
10 -31 -90 PAGE 17,
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
303J62
11/05/90
84.71-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
303J62
11/05/90
.41-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
303J62
11/05/90
6.91-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
303J62
11/05/90
17.41
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
303J62
11/05/90
2,653.47
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
303J62
11/05/90
25.96
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
03J62
11/05/90
3,465.25
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL .
03J62
11/05/90
26.85
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
303J62
11/05/90
4,235.45
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
303J62
11/05/90
-2.95
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
303J62
11/05/90
11.80
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
303J62
11/05/90
.00
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
303J62
11/05/90
376.93
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
303J62
11/05/90
6.49
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
303J62
11/05/90
388.72
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
303J62
11/05/90
202.00
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
303J62
11/05/90
.00
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
303J62
11/05/90
353.92
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
303J62
11/05/90
9.44
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
303J62
11/05/90
.59
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
303J62
11/05/90
21.24
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
303J62
11/05/90
118.99
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
303J62
11/05/90
41.20
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
303J62
11/05/90
736.43
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
303J62
11/05/90
.00
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
303J62
11/05/90
689.02
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
303J62
11/05/90
8.85
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
13,120.73
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
303N12
11/07/90
2,284.95
MUTUAL BEN LIFE
INSURANCE
10- 4158- 510 -51
MANUAL
2,284.95
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
303P20
11/05/90
72.90
PAUSTIS & SONS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
303P20
11/07/90
43.95
PAUSTIS & SONS
MIX
50- 4632 - 862 -86
MANUAL
116.85
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
303P82
11/05/90
3.68-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
303P82
11/05/90
2.02-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
303P82
11/05/90
.44-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
303P82
11/05/90
9.07-
PRIOR WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
303P82
11/05/90
44.39
PRIOR WINE'
50- 4626 - 862 -86
- MANUAL
303P82
11/05/90
348.49
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
303P82
11/07/90
19.95
PRIOR WINE
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
303P82
11/05/90
201.80
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
303P82
11/05/90
906.58
PRIOR WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
303P82
11/07/90
-17.65
PRIOR WINE
MIX
50- 4632 - 842 -84
MANUAL
1,523.65
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
1990 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
10 -31 -90 PAGE 18
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. 9 MESSAGE
303Q16
11/05/90
37.31-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
303Q16
11/05/90
7.49-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
303Q16
11/05/90 .,
1.18-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
303Q16
11/05/90
35.52-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
303Q16
11/05/90
6.82-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
303Q16
11/05/90
2.747
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
303Q16
11/05/90
5.91-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
303Q16
11/05/90
1.86-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
303Q16
11/05/90
5.91-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
303Q16
11/05/90
5.91
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
303Q16
11/05/90
7.24-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
303Q16
11/05/90
74.82-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
303Q16
11/05/90
.78-
QUALITY WINE-
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
303Q16
11/05/90
1,866.17
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
303Q16
11/05/90
746.75
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
303Q16
11/05/90
1,776.52
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
303Q16
11/05/90
136.76
- QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
303Q16
11/05/90
59.08
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
303Q16
11/05/90
29.00-
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
303Q16
11/05/90
93.36
QUALITY WINE_
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
"303Q16
11/05/90
3,740.70
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
303Q16
11/05/90
29.00
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
303Q16
11/05/90
295.35
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
303Q16
11/05/90
681.35
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
303Q16
11/05/90
721.55
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
303Q16
11/05/90
77.90
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
10,013.82
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
�.
11/07/90
14,343.32
FIDELITY BANK
FICA
10- 4149- 510 -51
MANUAL
- S2dr"�
11/07/90
728.30
FIDELITY BANK
MEDICARE
10- 4162 - 510 -51
MANUAL
303f14
15,071.62
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
323H83
11/07/90
50,000.00-
HRA
TRANSFER
10- 1145 - 000 =00
MANUAL
323H83
11/07/90
50,000.00
HRA
TRANSFER
10- 1145 - 000 -00
MANUAL
.00
* * * **
* ** -CKS
963,362.61
FUND 10 TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
2,475.02
FUND 12 TOTAL
COMMUNICATIONS
1,133.23
FUND 23 TOTAL
ART CENTER
918.46
FUND 26 TOTAL
SWIMMING POOL FUND
18,166.26
FUND 27 TOTAL
GOLF COURSE FUND
13,893.11
FUND 28 TOTAL
RECREATION CENTER FUND
452.18
FUND 29 TOTAL
GUN RANGE FUND
14,555.23
FUND 30 TOTAL
EDINBOROUGH PARK
46,097.62
FUND 40 TOTAL
UTILITY FUND
76.47
FUND 41 TOTAL
STORM SEWER UTILITY
254,606.06
FUND 50 TOTAL
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
1,315,736.25*
TOTAL