Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-12-17_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA CITY COUNCIL EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DECEMBER 17, 1990 (Convene City Council Meeting) ROLLCALL I. PUBLIC HEARING - TRUTH IN TAXATION - ADOPTION OF 1991 BUDGET (Temporarily Adjourn City Council Meeting) (Convene HRA Meeting) _ I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA MEETING OF DECEMBER 3, 1990 II. AWARD OF BIDS A. Centennial Lakes Park - Pedestrian Bridge B. Centennial Lakes Park - Light Fixtures C. Centennial Lakes Park - Site Furnishings (Contd from 11/19%90 - Continue Indefinitely) III. EDINBOROUGH OFFICE BUILDING REFINANCING - HRA CERTIFICATE AND MODIFICATION AGREEMENT IV. UTILITY EASEMENT -'CENTENNIAL LAKES MEDICAL BUILDING V. ADJOURNMENT OF HRA (Reconvene City Council Meeting) AAA AWARD OF MERIT - Pedestrian Safety EDINA MASONIC LODGE PRESENTATION II. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. * III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of Regular Meeting of September 17 and October 1, 1990 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by .Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Preliminary Plat Approval - Belfry Addition - Lot 56, Morningside, Located at 4243 Grimes Avenue * B. Lot 9. White Oaks - Conservation Restriction V. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS _ VI. AWARD OF BIDS * A. Computer Aided Design Work Station Agenda Edina City Council December 17, 1990 Page 2 VII. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Park Board Recommendation - Municipal Pool Renovation B. Senior Center C. Approval of Traffic Safety'Committee Minutes of December 11, 1990 D. Proposal - Metro Relations, Inc. (Contd from 12/3/90) E. Land Acquisition - I -494 and Hwy 169 F. Approval of 1991 Teamster Contract Settlement G. Annual Volunteers Reception Date (4/23/91) H. Release of Construction'Easement - Lot 1, Block 2, Oscar Roberts First Addition VIII. RESOLUTIONS Favorable rollcall vote by majority of quorum to pass. A. Designation of Director /Alternate Director of SRA B. Designation of Director /Alternate Director of LOGIS C. Designation of Official Newspaper IX. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES A. RTB - $0.01 Metro Sales Tax B. MLC Report X. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL A. January 7, 1991 Council Meeting B. Annual Council /Boards Dinner Meeting XI. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS XII'. FINANCE Mon Dec Tues Dec Thurs Dec Wed - Dec Tues Jan Mon Jan Sat Jan Mon Jan Tues Jan Wed Jan �A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 12/17/90: Total $747,962.59 and confirmation of payment of Claims dated 11/30/90: Total $1,283,774.06 SCHEDULE OF'UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS 24 CHRISTMAS EVE - CITY HALL CLOSED AT NOON 25 CHRISTMAS DAY - CITY HALL CLOSED 27 Year End Council Meeting 31 NEW YEARS EVE - CITY HALL CLOSED AT NOON 1 NEW YEARS DAY - CITY HALL CLOSED 7 Regular Council Meeting 12 Council Work Session 21 MARTIN LUTHER KING-DAY - CITY HALL CLOSED 22 Regular Council Meeting 30 MLC Annual Legislative Dinner 4:30 p.m. Mgrs Conf Rm 7:00 p.m. Council Room 8:00 a.m. Arneson Acres 7:00 p.m. Council Room Decathlon MINUTES EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DECEMBER 3, 1990 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Chairman Richards. MINUTES of the BRA Meeting of November 19, 1990, were approved as submitted by motion of Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Smith. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chairman Richards declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director rr REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: 11RA FROM: GORDON L. HUGHES VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 DATE: DECEMBER 17, 1990 AGENDA ITEM HRA II. A ITEM DESCRIPTION: CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK - PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE Company Amount of Quote or Bid � See attached bid tabulations. 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Lewis Engineering -Co, -- $50,965.00. GENERAL INFORMATION: See attached memo. Signature Department . The Recommended bid is within budget not w' in dget o n Wallin, inance Director _ Kenneth Rosland City Manager I M E M O'R A N D U M DATE: December 17, 1990 TO: Housing and Redevelopment Authority FROM: Gordon L. Hughes SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE - CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE_, LIGHT FIXTURES, AND SITE -FURNISHINGS Last May, the HRA accepted bid proposals for the initial phase of Centennial Lakes Park. The bid specifications were designed to afford flexibility to accept or reject bids for certain elements of this project. In fact, the bid specifications provided twenty alternate bids for HRA consideration. Based upon pricing concerns, the HRA implemented staff's recommendation to reject the alternate bids for light fixtures and site furnishings.' In addition, the HRA elected to purchase one rather than two pedestrian bridges. We have now solicited independent bids.for the pedestrian bridge and for the light fixtures. We are happy to report that low bids for each of these items are substantially less than the bids received and rejected last May. The low bid for the pedestrian bridge is $50,965., which compares with a bid of $70,500 last May. The low light fixture bid is $76,950., which compares with a bid of $117,200 from.last May. The principal reason for receiving lower bids is our ability to deal.directly with the fabricator or installer of these products, rather than a general contractor who must add his overhead and profit to.the bid. In the case of the light fixtures,'we were also able to attract other light fixture fabrication companies who did not bid last May. On October 15, 1990, staff recommended award of a bid for site furnishings for Centennial. Lakes Park. The October 15, 1990, bid for site furnishings was $17,793. This compares to a low bid from last May of $26,520. The HRA continued this item at the October 15, 1990, meeting due•to concerns regarding-cost and the fact that there-was only one bidder for the site furnishings. Staff is still in the process of evaluating alternatives to the site furnishings and suggest that this item be continued indefinitely until we have assembled our'recommendations. BID RESULTS CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK - WEST SIDE IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTOR PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE LIGHT FIXTURES BASE ALTERNATE LEWIS ENGINEERING $ 50,965. DNCON, INC. 62,675. . GEORGE COOK 67,800. CD SYSTEMS 77,245. PAGE ELECTRIC $ 76,590. $103,246. KILLMER ELECTRIC 92.,164. 120,164. ELECTRIC SERVICE .CO. 93,350. 122,286. EGAN -MCKAY 99,874. 129,490. STEVENS ELECTRIC 100,547. 131,635. RIDGEDALE ELECTRIC 118,150. 151,350. SHAW - LINDQUIST 59,680. 111,622. 147,926. gtrSA. �Ir . 8, O p 'G REQUEST FOR PURCHASE O rJ �N r Sys TO: HRA FROM: GORDON L. HUGHES VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00 DATE:. DECEMBER 17, 199 AGENDA ITEM HRA II . B ITEM DESCRIPTION: CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK - LIGHT FIXTURES l Companv Amount of Quote or Bid 2• See attached bid tabulations. 2• 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: PAGE ELECTRIC - $76,590.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: See-attached memo. Signs u e V Department The Recommended bid is within budget not wit 'n b get Wallin, nance Director Kenneth Rosland, City Man ger M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 17, 1990 TO: Housing and Redevelopment Authority FROM: Gordon L. Hughes SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE - CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE, LIGHT FIXTURES, AND SITE FURNISHINGS Last May, the HRA accepted bid proposals for the initial phase of Centennial Lakes Park. The bid specifications were designed to afford flexibility to accept or reject bids for certain elements of this project..- In fact, the bid specifications provided twenty alternate bids for HRA consideration. Based upon pricing concerns, the HRA implemented staff's recommendation to reject the alternate bids for light fixtures and site furnishings. In addition, the HRA elected to purchase one rather than two pedestrian bridges. We have now solicited independent bids for the pedestrian bridge and for the light fixtures. We are happy to report that low bids for each of these items are substantially less than the bids received and rejected last May. The low bid for the pedestrian bridge is $50,965., which compares with a bid of $70,500 last May. The low light fixture bid is $76,950., which compares with a bid of $117,200 from last May. The principal reason for receiving lower bids is our ability to deal directly with the fabricator or installer of these products, rather than a general contractor who must add his overhead and profit to the bid. In the case of the light fixtures, we were also able to attract other light fixture fabrication companies who did not bid last May. On October 15, 1990, staff recommended award of a bid for site furnishings for Centennial Lakes Park. The October 15, 1990, bid for site furnishings was $17,793. This compares to a low bid from last May of $26,520. The HRA continued this item at the October 15, 1990, meeting due'to concerns regarding cost'and the fact that there was only one bidder for the site furnishings. Staff is still in the process of evaluating alternatives to the site furnishings and suggest that this item be continued indefinitely until we have assembled our recommendations. i BID RESULTS CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK - WEST SIDE IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTOR LEWIS ENGINEERING DNCON, INC. GEORGE COOK CD SYSTEMS PAGE ELECTRIC KILLMER ELECTRIC ELECTRIC SERVICE CO. EGAN -MCKAY STEVENS ELECTRIC - RIDGEDALE ELECTRIC SHAW - LINDQUIST l PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE LIGHT FIXTURES BASE ALTERNATE $ 50,965. 62,675. 67,800. 77,245. 59,680. N $ 76,590. $103,246. 92,164. 120,164. 93,350. 122,286. 99,874. 129,490. 100,547. 131,635. 118,150. 151,350. 113,622. 147,926. 050 FARR AV=VR NEW TORY, NRM TORS as two 415.0200 W" CONNE TM04T ""us, a. W. wAU Uf07W, 116 G SOON 7600 es"No 3 uaaoeoNUMV as2SST Lawmen Nov oaf, Sm"M ��- TpeM•OOY4 "o" PAR'S. VMS" sa•I..a.ea -66.60 45, aos >ss Taira 5 -040 s19pnL6.asLanx as- e- aft-T6 -u Agenda Item — HRA III. DONSEY & WHITNEY 9,200 MRST BANS PLACE XAST MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402`1496 (612) 340 -13600 TsLRX'RO.6605 nX (6111) 0A0`9655 TROMAs a. aRcseo . (OW 840 December 14,1990 The Honorable Members of the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland Director Edina HRA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 801 RseT XV214VR.S.Ia. SMIR 040 3003WITSR, Ylw MVA 30903 1609) 2e4-0136 INO R2sT INTa2YTATR ORNTNm MLL1ROS, nowax4L 63166 MAW 662.0soo am mANMION SIITLume Qua FALLS, Mon"& as" AM M -Yam AT W? FRONT MOST M1SSOM . YoNLNA ""a (406) Tat -6028 Re: Refinancing of the Office Building at Edinborough Honorable Members of the Board of Commissioners and Mr. Rosland: Edinborough Corporate East Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership ( "Owner") owns the office building at Edinborough. It is refinancing that office building by a mortgage loan from United States Leasing International, Inc. ( "Lender "). In connection with that mortgage loan, the Lender has requested that the Edina HRA sign an Estoppel Certificate and enter into .a Modification Agreement. t The Estoppel Certificate is fairly standard in nature being statements to the effect that the various agreements with the HRA (being the Redevelopment Contract, the Easement Agreement, the agreement relating to the Public Maintenance Charge and the Assessment Agreement) are not in default except to the extent stated, that the documents have not been amended except to the extent DoRSEY & WHITNEY Honorable Members of the Edina BRA Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland December 14,1990 Page 2 we have advised them, that the HRA is not presently asserting any setoff, claim or defense against the enforcement by the Owner of the agreements, confirming the amount of the public maintenance charge, confirming the amount payable under the Assessment Agreement, and similar matters. Mr. Hughes and I have'reviewed and revised the Certificate, have found it acceptable, and recommend adoption of a resolution authorizing its execution by any two officers with such changes as the signing officers. deem appropriate and delivery by the HRA. The Modification Agreement does essentially three things: (i) it provides for notice to the Lender in the event of a default by the Owner and an opportunity to cure by the Lender during a period of time equal to the time given to the Owner, but commencing and running subsequent to the expiration of the Owner's time; (ii) it provides if the office building is condemned in whole or in such part that it is not practicable to rebuild, then the condemnation proceeds, Instead of being used to rebuild the building, may be used to pay the Lender's mortgage, with the excess proceeds being payable to the BRA, and in that event the Owner will also pay to the HRA the then present value of the stream of real estate taxes which would have been paid by the office building under the Assessment Agreement to the City up to and including the maturity date of the Tax Increment Bonds sold for the Edinborough project (being August 1, 2009) discounted by the interest rate on treasury bills maturing on or closest to the maturity date of the Bonds; and WHO it provides that if the condemnation proceeds are used to rebuild the building, or if the whole of the Park is taken in condemnation at the same time as the office building, then the payment otherwise to be made to the HRA (being seven times the annual maintenance charge) need not be paid. These modifications are essentially the same modifications as the HRA agreed to in connection with the mortgage presently on the office building which is being refinanced. Mr. Hughes and I have reviewed this modification, have found it acceptable, and recommend adoption of a resolution authorizing its execution by any two officers with such changes as the signing officers deem appropriate and delivery by the HRA. e DORSEY & WHITNEY Honorable Members of the Edina HRA Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland December 14,1990 Page 3 Closing of the new mortgage loan is scheduled for December 20, 1990, and the Certificate and Modification Agreement are necessary for that closing. Very truly yours, Thomas S. Erickson TSE:kks Enclosures cc: . Mr. Gordon Hughes, Executive Director ESTOPPEL CERTIFICATE United States Leasing International, Inc. c/o U.S. Real Estate Thomas R. J. Bracken, President 733 Front Street San Francisco, California 94111 RE: Edinborough Addition (i) Land Sale Agreement and Contract for Private Redevelopment between East Edina Housing Foundation and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina dated August 1, 1985, as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated October 1, 1985, Amendment No. 2 dated April 1, 1986, Amendment No. 3 dated July 10, 1986, Amendment No. 4 dated October 6, 1986, Amendment No. 5 dated February 19, 1987, Amendment No. 6 dated March 31, 1989, and the Modification Agreement dated . 1990 (the "Land Sale Agreement "); (ii) Declaration (of Easements) made by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina dated October 1, 1985, as amended. (the "Declaration "); (iii) Agreement (Covenants Running with the Land) by and between the Housing and, Redevelopment Authority of Edina and the Edinborough Corporate East Limited Partnership dated October 1, 1985, as amended (the "Agreement "); (iv) Assessment Agreement by and between the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina and the Edinborough Corporate East Limited Partnership dated October 1, 1985 (the "Assessment Agreement ") (the documents listed above are collectively termed herein the "Edina HRA Agreements ") Gentlemen: The undersigned, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota VEdina HRA ") hereby certifies and acknowledges to United States Leasing International, Inc. (the "Lender "), which is proposing to make a loan (the "Loan ") to Edinborough Corporate East Limited Partnership (the "Partnership ") secured by a mortgage (the "Mortgage ") on Lot 3, Block 1, Edinborough Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the "Property "), the truth and accuracy of the following statements:' Page 2 1. Except as stated in Paragraph 7 hereof, to the best of the undersigned's knowledge, the Partnership is not now and has not been in default under any of the terms, covenants and conditions of the Edina HRA Agreements. To .the best of the undersigned's knowledge, the Partnership, as of the date hereof, - has faithfully performed its obligations under the Edina BRA Agreements, Including, without limitation, its obligations under Section 3,5 of the Declaration with respect to the maintenance and repair of the Parking Facility, the parking lots, the access easements over and on the Property, and the sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer pipes described in the Declaration. 2. The undersigned has incurred no damage, expense, liability or claim for which it is asserting or intends to assert any right to indemnification from the Partnership under the Edina HRA Agreements. 3. Except for any amendments filed of record as of the date hereof, and except as identified hereinabove, the Edina HRA Agreements have not been amended or modified in any way. 4. The Edina BRA Agreements are in full force and effect. 5. The undersigned is not presently asserting any setoff, claim or defense against the enforcement by the Partnership of any of the undersigned's obligations under the Edina HRA Agreements, and the undersigned is not aware of the present existence of any setoff, claim or defense against the Partnership should the Partnership seek to enforce any of the undersigned's obligations under the Edina HRA Agreements. 6. The undersigned has not and is not performing Work (as that term is defined in the Declaration) for which the undersigned expects reimbursement from the Partnership. 7. As of the date hereof, the Public Maintenance Charge (as described in Section 4 (5) of the Agreement) is $1,946.45 per month. The language at line 23 in Section 4 (3) (i) of the Agreement stating that the Public Maintenance Charge shall be payable at a base rate of $22,390.00 "per month" is in error, and, consistent with the intent of the parties to the Agreement, the stated base rate is an annual rate, not a monthly rate. The Public Maintenance Charge is adjusted on the first day of September of each year based upon the Price Index (as defined in the Agreement). The Partnership is delinquent with respect to Public Maintenance Charges payable for August, 1990 and subsequent months. Page 3 8. The undersigned is not aware of any default on the part of the Partnership with respect to its insurance obligations owed to or running in favor of the undersigned under the Edina HRA agreements. 9. The year in which the Minimum Improvements (as defined in the Assessment Agreement) with respect to the Property were initially assessed, is 1987. Pursuant to the provisions of the Assessment Agreement, the minimum real estate taxes payable in each of the five years following the year in which the Minimum Improvements with respect to the Property were initially assessed are: 1988: $236,000 1989: $243,080 1990: ' $250,372 1991: $257,884 1992: $265,620 Pursuant to the Assessment Agreement, minimum real estate taxes for all years subsequent to the fifth year listed above shall not exceed the amount stated for said fifth year. 10. The present driveways and sidewalks on the Property are adequate for access by vehicles and pedestrians to and from the public streets, parking lot, Parking Facility and the Park. The undersigned currently has no plans to require that additional sidewalks or driveways be provided on and over the Property. 11. The undersigned has not declared, granted or otherwise created any easements that burden or benefit the Property other than as are described in the Declaration (and any amendments thereto filed of record) or shown on the recorded plats of Edinborough Addition and Meadow Lane II Addition. 12. The execution and delivery of this Certificate by the undersigned does not require any consent, vote or approval by the undersigned which has not been given or taken. 13. The undersigned is presently the fee owner of Lot 4, Block 1, Edinborough Addition (the "Park Property "). The undersigned has not assigned or otherwise transferred, and has no present intent to, transfer, any of its rights under Page 4 the Edina HRA Agreements, except that the undersigned does have a present intent to transfer ownership of the Park Property to the City of Edina and all rights and obligations under the HRA Agreements that go with such ownership. 14. . Except as provided in the Edina HRA Agreements with the City of Edina dated July 10, 1986, and except such taxes, assessments, water, sewer and other charges as are typical obligations of any property owner in the City of Edina, no other charges or payments are payable by the Partnership to the undersigned, the City of Edina, or the East Edina Housing Foundation. Except for the Edina HRA Agreements, there are no contracts between the Partnership and the undersigned, the City of Edina or the East Edina Housing Foundation which would be enforceable against Lender should Lender foreclose on the Property which are not terminable without cause on thirty (30) days notice or less. 15. The Partnership has paid in full all amounts required of it under that certain Agreement (Additional. Developer Payments) with the City of Edina dated July 10, 1986, and has no further obligation under said Agreement. 16. The undersigned hereby acknowledges that upon any foreclosure by Lender of its Mortgage or transfer in lieu of foreclosure, Lender (or other purchaser at the foreclosure sale) shall, upon the expiration of the applicable period of redemption, be entitled to succeed to all of the rights and obligations of the Partnership under the Edina HRA Agreements. 17. The consent of the undersigned is not required to mortgage the Property to Lender or to any other lender.. 18. This Certification shall be binding upon, and shall inure ' to the benefit of, the respective successors and assigns of the Lender and the undersigned. This Certification is executed and delivered by the undersigned with the knowledge that Lender will rely upon the statements contained herein in connection with the making of a Loan on the Property and may rely hereon. Unless otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms have the meaning assigned to them in the Edina HRA Agreements. Page 5 Dated: .1990 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By Its And Its STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of :1990 by and the and respectively of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota. Notary Public MODIFICATION AGREEMENT THIS MODIFICATION AGREEMENT is made as of this _ day of. December, 19901 by and between the Housing and Redevetopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a body corporate and politic under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the "HRA "), the East Edina Housing Foundation, a Minnesota non- profit corporation (the "Foundation ") and The Edinborough Corporate East Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership (the "Owner "). RECITALS: - A. The HRA and Foundation have entered into a Land Sale Agreement and Contract for Private Redevelopment dated as of August 1, 1985 (said agreement and contract, as amended, being herein called the "HRA Contract "). B. The .Foundation and the Edina Partnership, a Minnesota general partnership, have entered into a Land Sale Agreement and Contract for Private Redevelopment dated as of August 1, 1985 (said, agreement and contract, as amended, being herein called the "Foundation Contract "). C. The Owner is, by means of assignments and contracts, now the owner of the Office Development Phase I (as defined in the HRA Contract) on the real property situated in the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as follows: Lot 3, Block 1, Edinborough Addition, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota (the "Property "). D. The Owner and the BRA have entered that certain Agreement (Covenants Running with the Land) dated October 1, 1985 (said Agreement, as amended, being herein called the "Agreement (Covenants Running with the Land ")). . E. The Owner desires a loan (the Loan ") from United States Leasing International, Inc., a Delaware corporation ( "Mortgagee "), up to the sum of $11,500,000, which indebtedness shall be secured by a mortgage (the "Mortgage ") on the real property in favor of Mortgagee. F. Mortgagee is unwilling to stake the Loan without certain amendments, for the benefit of itself. and for the benefit of all future mortgagees with respect to the Property, to the notice of default, cure and eminent domain provisions contained the HRA Contract, the Foundation Contract and the Agreement (Covenants Running with the Land). G. The HRA and Foundation deem it to be in their best interest that the Owner be able to obtain ,financing secured by the Property. H. The Owner and Mortgagee have requested this Modification Agreement. AGREEMENT: NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants provided herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and .sufficiency of which the parties hereto hereby acknowledge, the HRA, Foundation and Owner do hereby covenant and agree for the benefit of Mortgagee as follows, which covenants and agreements shall control over any contrary or inconsistent provisions in the BRA Contract or Foundation Contract, or in the Agreement (Covenants Running with the Land) dated as of October I, 1985, between the HRA and/or the Foundation and the Owner: 1. Default ustder the HRA Contract. Whenever the HRA shall give notice or demand to the Owner with respect to any Event of Default (as defined in -the BRA Contract) under the HRA Contract, the HRA at the same time shall give a copy of such notice or demand to the Mortgagee. The Mortgagee shall have the same rights to cure an Event of Default under the HRA Contract as has the Owner, but the Mortgagee's time to cure shall commence after expiration of the time.to cure granted by the HRA Contract to the Owner, and the HRA, shall accept such cure by the Mortgagee as the act of the Owner. 2. Default }inde, r the Agreement ( ovenants Running with the Land). The BRA agrees, that if the Owner shall default in any of its obligations to the HRA under the Agreement (Covenants Running with the Land), the HRA . shall, before exercising any of the remedies available to the HRA with respect to said default and irrespective of whether any notice and opportunity to cure is required to be given to the Owner under the. Agreement (Covenants Running with the Land), give notice to.Mortgagee specifying the nature of the default. The HRA agrees that the Mortgagee shall have the same time periods set forth in Section 10.2 of the HRA Contract, and that the Mortgagee's time period to cure such default shall commence at the later of (i) the giving of said notice to Mortgagee by the HRA or (ii) the expiration of any time to cure granted by the Agreement (Covenants running With the Land) to the Owner. The HRA shall accept such cure by the Mortgagee as the act of the Owner. 3. Default under the Foundation Contract. Whenever the Foundation shall give notice or demand to the Owner with respect to any Event of Default (as defined in the Foundation Contract) under the Foundation Contract, the Foundation at the same time shall give a. copy of such notice or demand to the Mortgagee. The Mortgagee shall have the same rights to cure an Event of Default under the Foundation Contract as has the Owner, but the Mortgagee's time to cure shall commence after expiration of the time to cure granted by the Foundation Contract to the Owner, and the Foundation shall accept such cure by the Mortgagee as the act of the Owner. •• t.• • •q$ - i. • ••lye• (a) Provided that the Mortgage obligates ' the Mortgagee to comply with the provisions of Section 4 (c) and (d) hereof, the HRA and Foundation agree that Net Proceeds (as defined in the HRA Contract) from a taking by exercise of the power of eminent domain, or a sale in lieu thereof, shall be payable to the Mortgagee to the extent of the Mortgagee's rights thereto under the terms of the Mortgage, and, subject to the rights of the HRA pursuant to the provisions of Article VI of the HRA. Contract, as amended by this Modification Agreement, said Net Proceeds may be applied pursuant to the provisions of the Mortgage. (b) The HRA, Foundation and Owner agree that if such Net Proceeds are such as are governed by the provisions of Section 6.3 of the Land Sale Agreement, Mortgagee may elect, pursuant to Section 6.3 (i) and (ii) of the Land Sale Agreement, whether or not to apply such proceeds to restoration of the Property. (c) Subject to the rights of Mortgagee described in subparagraph (d) immediately following, if Mortgagee elects not to restore the Property, Mortgagee shall first pay to the HRA, out of the Net Proceeds, the Tax Increment Reimbursement (as hereinafter defined), and the balance shall belong to Mortgagee to be applied in accordance with the provisions of its Mortgage. (d) If (i) the entire Property is taken by condemnation or sold in lieu thereof, or (ii) a portion of the Property is taken by condemnation or sold in lieu thereof, restoration of the Property is not practicable, and Mortgagee elects not to restore, then the Foundation and the HRA agree that Mortgagee may first apply the proceeds to all amounts secured by its Mortgage, and the balance of the proceeds remaining after all amounts secured by the Mortgage are fully paid, if any, shall be payable to the HRA pursuant to Section 6.3 (ii) of the HRA Contract. a (e) If Mortgagee exercises its right to apply Net Proceeds to the amounts secured by its Mortgage rather than to restoration of the Property, and provided Mortgagee has not paid the Tax Increment Reimbursement in full pursuant to Section 4 (c) and (d) hereof, Owner hereby agrees to pay to the HRA, upon demand, an amount equal to the then unpaid balance of the Tax Increment Reimbursement (as defined below).. (f) "Tax Increment Reimbursement" shall mean an amount equal. to the following: (i) the aggregate of $265,620 in each of the then current and each future calendar year until and including 2009, discounted from June 30 of each year at a discount rate equal to the yield on United States Treasury Bonds maturing on or closest to August 15, 2009 as published in The Wall Street To=al on the date of the taking or sale in lieu thereof; (ii) less real estate taxes paid with respect to the Property in the year of the taking or sale in lieu thereof (other than real estate taxes representing taxes which were to be paid in a prior calendar year and applicable interest and penalties with respect thereto). .5. Park MAintenance Chaggg Condemnation PayMent. The HRA hereby agrees that, anything to the contrary in the HRA Contract, including, without limitation, Section 3.6 (1) thereof, and anything to the contrary in the Agreement (Covenants Running . with the Land), including, without limitation, Section 4 (5) (viii) thereof, notwithstanding, the Public Maintenance Charge times seven (hereinafter, the " PMC Condemnation Payment ") described in Section 4 (5) (viii) of the Agreement (Covenants Running with the Land) shall be payable to the owner of the Park Site only if the condemnation proceeds with respect to the Property (or proceeds from a sale in lieu of condemnation) are not applied to restoration of the Property. The HRA further agrees that, as to this Property only, that the portion of any, condemnation award or proceeds of any sale made in lieu of condemnation to be paid to the owner of the Park Site (as defined in the HRA Contract) pursuant to Section 3.6 (i) of the HRA Contract and Section 4 (5) (viii) of the Agreement (Covenants Running with .the Land) shall not be payable to the owner of the Park Site if all of the Park Site is taken in condemnation or,sold in lieu of condemnation, in the same, or in connection with the same, condemnation proceeding. 6. Notices. _ Any notice, request or other communication, required or permitted under this section shall be deemed sufficiently given if in writing and, if delivered, when personally delivered to an officer of the party to whom it is addressed, or if mailed, when deposited in the United States mail, and sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: If to Mortgagee: United States Leasing International, Inc. 733 Front Street San Francisco, California 94111 Attention: President, U. S. Real Estate If to the HRA: Housing and Redevelopment Authority. of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Attention: Executive Director If to . the Foundation: East Edina Housing Foundation 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Attention: Executive Director If to Owner: Edinborough Corporate East Limited Partnership or at such other place or at such other address (or to the attention of such other person) with respect to any such party as that party may, from time to time, designate by- notice given to the other as provided herein. 7. Egtoj2pel Letter. The HM, upon request, from time to time made, shall execute and deliver to Mortgagee, a letter reciting any Events of Default then known to the HRA under the FIRA Contract or Agreement (Covenants Running with the Land), or, if none exist to the best knowledge of the HRA, reciting that such be the case. The Foundation, upon request, from time to time made, shall execute and deliver to Mortgagee a letter reciting any Events of Default then known to the Foundation under the Foundation Contract, or if none exist to the best knowledge of the Foundation, reciting that such be the case. .81 Successors and Assi=. The terms and provisions hereof shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the HRA, the Foundation and the Owner, and their respective successors and assigns, and shall inure to the benefit of the Mortgagee, all future holders of the Mortgagee's interest in the Mortgage, and to any future mortgagee with respect to the Property so long as said future mortgagee complies with the terms..and conditions stated herein. 9. This Agreement Limited to the P gyer - This Modification Agreement shall modify and amend the HRA Contract, Agreement (Covenants Running with the Land) and Foundation Contract only as they apply to this Property. 10. Gov, ernine Law. This instrument shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the parties hereto as of the day and year first above written. HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By— its And Its STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of .1990 by and the and respectively of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota. Notary Public EAST EDINA HOUSING FOUNDATION By Its And Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) J The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of .1990 by and the and , respectively, of the East Edina Housing Foundation, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation, on behalf of the corporation. M Notary Public EDINBOROLJGH CORPORATE EAST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By Edina Office Limited Partnership, General Partner By: Its: By Inter -Corp Holdings, Inc., General Partner By Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA) � )35, COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was. acknowledged before me this day of December, 1990, by the of Inter - Group Holdings, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation as a general partner of Edinborough Corporate East Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of December, 1990, by 1 the of Edina Office Limited Partnership, a Minnesota Limited Partnership, on behalf of the partnership as a general partner of Edinborough Corporate East Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership. Notary Public . w9�N�1r'lr i� o e , v. N -~ .�° REPORT /RECOMMENDATION •'��HPORPS�O • +eee To: Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Edina From: Francis Hoffman�y�� City Engineer J /� Date: 17 December, 1990 Subject: Utility Easements for France Med Building Centennial Lakes Recommendation: Agenda Item # HRA iv. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr,. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Authorize signatures for utility easements on Centennial Lakes project. Info/Background- The medical building on the Centennial Lakes project has telephone, electrical, and gas lines that run across HRA property to service their building. Additionally, individual storm sewers run from the building site to the pond. The developers are requesting that easements be granted where necessary acros's HRA property to allow such utilities. These issues were discussed during development and agreed that easements would be sought after the utilities are actually installed. Staff would recommend granting these easements. .ld+ to • FRANCE MED ASS( CON wAuc cif b Do 4 f/ 6 '`% Wafer �ef�.�fien ELECTRIC t \1 - -TRANS ON `, 6Q CONIC AD AI 8 01 ei ?Y Of ,01NA +e 1 , �� lea i 11RA Wa %r Aehrn, An W sw °� d► cad °�y �% " -�� • � �; Noi +.0b s0 ` � � ��aF ��N �uN� i�• � 6S I\ , t . a BULDINO wut d15 tea,: -_ - 1 , 9 NW OF PROP DINE 1 - } 1 i6 ' 1 � 6 1 i i.E.a CIO A 1 1 1 •• •,, �, �. ' 1 s , , 1 1 VA N P 4j _tT - -•--' :� St` c��c� has v F S AVI Foundation s =.t� For Sa f e t y Minneapoiis /Craig 5400 WEST 39TH STREET ❑ MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA ❑ 55416 -2576 December 3, 1990 Police Chief Craig Swanson Edina Police Department 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN. 55424 Dear Chief Swanson: Congratulations upon winning The 1989 American Automobile Club Association award for achievement "Award of Merit" in pedestrian safety which is part of the AAA's 51st Annual Pedestrian Protection Program. The enclosed information gives the pertinent information about this prestigious award, along with the 1990 AAA Pedestrian Protection Program winners fact sheet/ appraisal program information. We would like to present your award plaque at one of your future City Council _ meetings either to yourself, council chairperson or city mayor Mr. Fred Richards. Also at that meeting we could invite the local media to attend this presentation is an excellent publicity vehicle for your city. If you are interested, please give me a call at 927 -2537 and we can discuss the date, place and time for this presentation. thank you. 'I .Cordially, e Boche Community Services Manager M4H25 cc: Rod Shilkrot, Vice President, Marketing and Membership Development Enclosure: 1990 Pedestrian Protection Program Information of Winners Fact Sheet/plus Appraisal Program i J RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION WHEREAS, for the past 13 years the Edina Masonic Lodge has donated money, to the Edina Fire Department for its rescue-equipment; and WHEREAS, this money has been earned by members of the Lodge from their efforts in putting on an annual Pancake Breakfast; and WHEREAS', a check in the amount of $1,500 has been.generously given to the Edina Fire Department for purchase of rescue equipment; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that most sincere appreciation be expressed to all members of the Edina Masonic Lodge for its interest in the well -being of all Edina residents through this generous contribution; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Resolution be entered into the Minutes and that an appropriate copy be presented to the EDINA MASONIC LODGE . as a token of gratitude of the Edina City Council and all the citizens of Edina. ADOPTED this 17th day of December; 1990. Mayor I RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION WHEREAS, for the past 13 years the Edina Masonic Lodge has donated money to the Edina Fire Department for its rescue equipment; and WHEREAS, this money has been.earned by members of the Lodge from their efforts in putting on an annual Pancake Breakfast; and WHEREAS, a check in the amount of $1,500, has been generously given to the Edina Fire Department for purchase of rescue equipment; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that most sincere appreciation be expressed to all members of the Edina Masonic Lodge for its interest in the well -being of all.Edina residents through this generous contribution; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Resolution be entered into the Minutes and that an appropriate copy be presented to the EDINA MASONIC LODGE as a token of gratitude of the Edina City Council and all the citizens of Edina. ADOPTED this 17th day of December, 1990. Mayor MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL OCTOBER 1, 1990 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice and Mayor Richards. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OF REGUTAR MEETING OF AUGUST 20, 1990 APPROVED Motion,was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of August 20, 1990. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. PUBLIC HEARING CONCLUDED ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR TREE REMOVAL PROJECT NO. TR -89 AT 5528 HALIFAX AV: LEVY DEFERRED UNTIL 1991 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARINGS Manager Rosland recalled that the special assessment for Tree Removal Project No. TR -89 at 5528 Halifax Avenue (Levy No. 11894) had been continued from the September 17, 1990 meeting so that the contractor could be contacted regarding the allegation that the tree removal had caused damage to the property owner's yard. Because the contractor and property owner have refused to meet in an attempt to negotiate the issue, staff would recommend that Council action on the special assessment levy be deferred until the 1991 special assessment hearings so that the issue can be resolved. Member Paulus made a motion to defer action on the special assessment levy for Tree Removal Project No. TR -89 at 5528 Halifax Avenue (Levy No. 11894) until the 1991 special assessment hearings. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards Motion carried. (Member Smith entered the meeting at 7:10 p.m. during presentation of the following proposed Tree Trimming Project No. TT -90.) PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED ON PROPOSED TREE TRIMMING PROJECT NO. TT -90: PROJECT ORDERED Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Park and Recreation Director Kojetin stated that the Tree Trimming Project No. TT -90 is proposed for an area bounded by Highway 100 on the west, 54th Street on the south, the eastern City boundary line on the east and the northern City boundary line on the north. The project would consist of trimming of boulevard trees and the total cost of the proposed project is estimated at $99,960.23, based on tree diameter at chest level (i.e. 4 1/2 feet). If the Council wishes to proceed, the project should be ordered at the conclusion of the hearing and bid as awarded. The special assessment hearing would be held in the fall of 1991. Director Kojetin explained that in 1984 trimming program with the intent to trio years. Since 1984 all boulevard trees i trimmed and this would begin the second within 15 feet from.the curb or asphalt included. The trees are trimmed so as t street to the lower branches to provide trimming also includes minimum shaping, wood. Statistics indicate that there ax area. Notices of the public hearing wex 1,188 properties have at least one tree; the City initiated a city -wide tree all boulevard trees within six to seven n the four quadrants of the City have been round of tree trimming in Edina. Trees or 30 feet from the street centerline are o maintain a height of 15 feet from the clearance for vehicular traffic. The thinning, removal of suckers and dead e 2,251 trees within the proposed trimming e mailed to 1,842 property owners of which 654 properties are without trees. V Director Kojetin presented the following methods to consider for'assessing the project at the special assessment hearings in the fall of 1991: 1) Assess on a per tree basis - $44.40 per tree 2) Assess'all properties with or without trees - $54.20 per property 3) Assess based on diameter of tree at chest level - $2.50 per inch for trees under 12 inches - $2.95 per.inch for trees over 12 inches Staff would recommend that Council consider assessing the project based on diameter of tree at chest level (per inch, per tree). It was noted that resident response to the mailed hearing notice has been tabulated and presented to the Council. Mayor Richards then called for public comment on the proposed Tree Trimming Project No. TT -90 and method of assessment. Speaking in objection to the project were: Cal Simons, 4619 Wooddale Avenue; Duncan Burns, 4523 Arden Avenue; Ruth Elwell, 4311 Eton Place; Fred Siekert, 4390 Mackey Avenue; Delois Fechner, 4116 France Avenue; Tom Reiersgord, 4500 W. 44th Street; LeRoy Wesley, 4211 Oakdale Avenue; John Palombo, 4624 Browndale Avenue;,Carla Morhauser, 4307 Bramson Street; Jack Curtis, 4400 West 50th Street; Erick Flack, 4212 Lynn; Kelsey Smith, 4801 West 44th Street; Bill Beard, 4606 Sunnyside Road; Loren Anderson, 4112 France, Avenue, Michael Casserly, 4611 Bruce Avenue; and Gary Dewell, 5128 Gorgas Avenue. Speaking in support of the project were: Jim and Ann Maciei, 4630 Bruce Avenue; Bill Doublas, 4409 Bramson Street; Bright Dornblaser, 4630 Drexel Avenue, Bob McLane, 4527 Arden Avenue; Dave Dunhane, 4401 Country Club Road and Carol Cherney, 4621 Casco Avenue. Mayor Richards then called for comments from the Council. Member Smith spoke to the following: 1) Contractor should be supervised to be sure City will get quality trimming, 2) Estimated cost of $44.40 per tree is good value, 3) Trees to be trimmed should be defined, 4) If homeowner takes care of own trees should not be assessed, and 5) City forester should provide standards for tree trimming to be followed by homeowner. Member Smith concluded by saying he felt the City's tree trimming program is .a good one and that he would support the staff recommendation to assess the cost on a per inch per tree basis for all trees needing trimming. Member Rice alluded to an aerial photo of the Country Club area in 1927 -28 when first developed and noted its barren look without trees. He said because he felt that all residents in that area benefit from the trees that now are there the assessment could be on an area wide basis, but would support the staff recommendation on assessment. Member Paulus made these comments: 1) That the City forester tag the trees to be trimmed when he did the preliminary survey so that the homeowner would know which trees are to be included in the project, 2) After the work was done that a quality card be left with the homeowner for comments so that any argument could be resolved then rather than at the assessment hearing a year later, and 3) That having one contractor for the project would shorten the time during which a neighborhood would be disrupted. Member Paulus concluded by saying that, although she felt the whole area would benefit, she would support the project and the staff recommendation on assessment. Mayor Richards stated that he would support the program because under the City contract homeowners would benefit by cost savings. Also, that he would support the staff recommendation on assessment which is based upon those directly benefitted. Member Smith made a motion to approve the staff recommendation for assessing the project based on diameter of tree at chest level (per inch, per tree) for all trees trimmed and then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ORDERING TREE TR EMNG PROJECT NO. TT -90 BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that this Council heretofore caused notice of hearing to be duly published and mailed to owners of each parcel within the area proposed to be assessed on the following proposed improvement: TREE TRIMMING PROJECT NO. TT -90 and at the hearing held at the time and place specified in said notice, the. Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the construction of said improvement including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights for construction and maintenance of such improvement; that said improvement is hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings. as: TREE TRIMMING PROJECT NO. TT -90 and the area to be specially assessed therefor shall include an area bounded by Highway 100 on the west, 54th Street on the south, the eastern City Boundary line on the east and the northern City boundary line on the north. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried;.resolution adopted. *LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR LOTS 1. 2. 3 AND 4. BLOCK 1. CARLSON'S PARK (4904 AND 4912 MERILANE) Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute various separate parcels: Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, CARLSON'S PARR and Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, CARLSON'S PARK; WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to subdivide said tracts into the following into the following.described new and separate parcels (herein called "Parcels "); Lots 1 and 2. Block 1, CARLSON'S PARK, except the southerly 45 feet of Lot 2, Block 1; CARLSON'S PARK and Lots 3 and 40 Block 1, CARLSON'S PARK, and the southerly 45 feet of Lot 2, Block 1, CARLSON'S PARK; WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance Nos. 804 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the_City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and.provisions of Ordinance No. 804 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Resolution adopted -on rollcall vote, four ayes. *LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR SOUTHDALE CENTER Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land: TRACT A, TRACT B, and TRACT C, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1455; and WHEREAS, the owner has requested the subdivision of said tract into separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described'as follows: , TRACT A. REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. TRACT B, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. TRACT C, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. TRACT D, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. ;and WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance Nos. 804 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 804 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Resolution adopted on rollcall vote, four ayes. *LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR LOT 1. BLOCK 1. INDIAN HILLS THIRD ADDITION AND LOT 1. BLOCK L. THE TIMBERS (6521 MC CAULEY TRAIL AND 6400 TIMBER TRAIL) Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute various separate parcels: Lot 1, Block 1, INDIAN HILLS THIRD ADDITION and Lot 1, Block 1, THE TIMBERS; WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire'to subdivide said tracts into the following into the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "Parcels "): Lot 1, Block 1, INDIAN HILLS THIRD ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, Except that part thereof which lies southeasterly of a line drawn northeasterly from a point on the southwesterly lot line of said Lot 1, Block 1 distant 30.00 feet northwesterly from the most southerly corner of.said Lot 1, Block 1 to a point on the southeasterly lot line of said Lot 1, Block 1 distant 95.50 feet northeasterly from said most southerly corner hereof and said line there terminating AND that part of Lot 1, Block 1, THE TIMBERS, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County Minnesota, which lies northwesterly of a line drawn in a southwesterly direction from a point on the northeasterly lot line of said Lot 1, Block 1 distant 30.00 feet southeasterly from the most northerly corner of said Lot 1, Block 1 to a point on the northwesterly lot line of said Lot 1, Block 1 distant 110.77 feet southwesterly from said most northerly corner thereof and said line there terminating, and Lot 1, Block 1, THE TIMBERS, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, Except that part thereof which lies northwesterly of a line drawn in a southwesterly direction from a point on the northeasterly lot line of said Lot 1, Block 1 distant 30.00 feet southeasterly from the most northerly corner of said Lot 1,'Block l to a point on the northwesterly lot line of said Lot 1, Block 1 distant 110.77 feet southwesterly from said most northerly corner thereof and said line there terminating. AND that part of Lot 1, Block 1, INDIAN HILLS THIRD ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, which lies southeasterly of a line drawn northeasterly from a point on the southwesterly lot line of said Lot 1, Block 1 distant 30.00 feet northwesterly from the most southerly corner of said Lot 1, Block 1 distant 95.50 feet northeasterly from said most southerly corner thereof and said line there terminating; WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with.the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance Nos. 804 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by,the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 804 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the.provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Resolution adopted on rollcall vote, four ayes. *HEARING DATE OF 10/15/90 SET FOR PLANNING MATTERS Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice setting October 15, 1990 as hearing date for the following Planning matters: 1) Amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 825 - Customary Home Occupations - Sections 4, 7 and 11 2) Preliminary Plat Approval - Farrell's Parkwood Knolls - 5700 Blake Road. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. *AWARD OF BID FOR CAHILL INTERPRETIVE SITE CONTINUED TO 10115190 Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice to continue award of bid for the Cahill Interpretive Site to October 15, 1990. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR TREE TRIMMING PROJECT NO. TT -90 Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for Tree Trimming Project No'. TT -90 to recommended low bidder, Precision Landscape and Tree, at $90,960.23. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR BITUMINOUS ALLEY PAVING IMPROVEMENT NO. E -32 Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for Bituminous Alley Paving Improvement No. E -32 (Alley between Oxford Avenue and Bedford Avenue south of West 51st Street) to recommended low bidder, DMJ Corporation, at $6,948.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR COMPUTER NETWORK FOR BUILDING DEPARTMENT Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for Computer Network for Building Department to recommended low bidder, Computerland, at $13,837.70. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR ELECTRICAL RESTORATION - CITY HALL Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for Electrical-Restoration of City Hall to recommended low bidder, Metro Electric Construction Company, Inc., at $7,000.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. RESOLUTION ADOPTED TO RECOMMEND RECESSION OF AMENDMENTS TO MINNESOTA. RULES OF , CRIMINAL`PROCEDURE Manager Rosland announced that Marsh Hallberg, Prosecuting Attorney, would present information on new criminal procedural rules which if adopted . would cost the City somewhere between $55,000 and $80,000 overtime for Police Officers. Marsh Hallberg explained that prosecutors are governed by Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure on how they conduct prosecution. The current procedure in Hennepin County regarding evidentiary rules is to make the determination on the day of trial (i.e.- bringing officers in to give live testimony, etc.). Because the vast majority of all cases are 'resolved before or on the trial date, there is no need to have the hearing. What has happened is the Supreme Court Criminal Rules Advisory Committee has decided that, for the sake of uniformity with outstate counties who have held early hearings, there may be value in requiring that within 14 days of the day the defendant first comes to court the hearing would have to be held. Attorney Hallberg pointed out that this procedure would be very costly for all cities as it would mean that the police officers involved in the arrest would have to be brought in for the omnibus hearing within the 14 day period. That would require payment of a vast amount of overtime to have the officers standby while waiting for their specific case to be called for hearing. Secondly, there would be additional staffing costs to cover the voids when officers have to be at the courthouse awaiting the hearings. Thirdly, prosecution costs would increase as the hearings would be held downtown instead at the 4th District Courthouse in Edina. Eight of the 54 judges in Hennepin County will be pulled off all their other duties just to handle these hearings. The intent of the amended rules is that there are issues as to admissible evidence and the early hearing will assist the prosecutors in negotiating the cases. However, in reality that is not the way it works. Most cases are garden variety and anyone with experience can red flag any unique issues and through talking with the opposing attorney they can be resolved. There is no need for the heavy hand of the court to clarify those issues at the early hearing. Attorney Hallberg said the suburban city councils are being contacted so that a strong message could be sent to the Criminal Rules Committee before the amendments are implemented on January 1, 1991. He urged the Council to adopt the resolution for recession of the amendments. Member Rice introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION TO RECOMMEND THE RECESSION OF THE AMENDMENTS "TO MINNESOTA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 8.04 AND 11.07 WHEREAS, The Edina City Council has met with representatives of the Edina Police Department and the Edina Prosecutor's Office to review anticipated changes to the Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure 8.04 and 11.07 have been amended to require that the omnibus hearing in all felony and gross misdemeanor cases be held within fourteen (14) days, of a defendant's first appearance in court; and, WHEREAS, the current practice in Hennepin County is to generally reserve the omnibus hearing until the day of trial; and WHEREAS, the current practice of reserving the omnibus issues until the day of, trial results in an overwhelming majority of the cases being settled without the need for an omnibus hearing or trial; and ' WHEREAS, the City of Edina currently conducts very few omnibus hearings; and WHEREAS, the defense bar and Hennepin County Public Defender's Office have indicated that under the amended rules they will demand an omnibus hearing on every gross misdemeanor and felony case; and WHEREAS, the implementation of the amendments to Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure 8.04 and 11.07 will have a substantial and detrimental impact on the City of Edina by: 1) causing a dramatic increase in the overtime costs of the Edina Police Department; and 2) creating the need to hire additional officers to handle the law enforcement duties of those officers who are needed to testify at omnibus hearings; and 3) causing a dramatic increase in the costs of prosecution to the City; and WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Attorney's Office, the Hennepin County Public Defender's Office, the Edina City Attorney's Office and the Edina Police Department all strongly oppose the amendment to Rules 8.04 and 11.07; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, as follows: 1. The Edina City Council strongly urges the Supreme Court Advisory Committee on the Rules of Criminal Procedure to recommend that the Minnesota Supreme Court either exempt Hennepin County from the amendments to Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure 8.04 and 11.07 or repeal the amendments entirely. 2. The Edina City Council strongly urges the Justices of the Minnesota Supreme Court to reconsider the amendments to Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure 8.04 and 11.07 and to either exempt Hennepin County from the amendments or to repeal the amendments entirely. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. MEMBER SMITH APPOINTED TO SHHSC BOARD Mayor Richards nominated Member Smith for appointment as-the elected official to the South Hennepin Human Services Council Board to fill the unexpired term of Member Kelly to 2/1/91. Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Kelly for consent of the Mayor appointment of Member Smith as the elected official to the South Hennepin Human Services Council Board. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Mayor Richards indicated that for the time being the vacancy for a citizen or staff members (Paul Gens resignation) be left open. VACANCIES ON HUMAN REIATIONS COMMISSION AND HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD NOTED Mayor Richards reminded the ICouncil Members of one vacancy each on the Human Relations Commission and Heritage Preservation Board and said he had no recommendations for appointment at the present time. He asked the Council Members to subject names of individuals they would recommend for these positions. ALTERNATIVE REVENUE SOURCES COMMITTEE DISCUSSED Regarding the proposed Alternative Revenue Sources Committee, Mayor Richards noted that several names had submitted for consideration. He said he would envision a committee of seven to ten in number and have them 'schedule two or three sessions (15 to 20 hours total) to review how the City raises revenues now and then ask them to brainstorm what alternative sources might work without getting into great depth and detail. He mentioned that if other Council Members had names to submit they do so before the next meeting so that the members could be confirmed and the charge to the committee could be discussed. ELECTION JUDGES APPOINTED FOR GENERAL ELECTION ON 11/06/90 Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the following election judges be appointed to serve ou.the election boards for the General Election to be held on November 6, 1990, and that the City Clerk be and is hereby authorized to make any substitutions or additions as may be deemed necessary: Precinct I.- Eugenia Williams, Chair, Lois Hallquist, Barbara Anderson, Dorie Capetz, Arleen Friday, Virginia, Vonhoff,, Audrey Kringel, Celia Nightingale, Shirley DeLeo; Precinct 2 - Marjorie Ruedy, Chair, Pauline Carroll, Elizabeth Anfinson, Joan Flumerfelt, Kathleen Tierney, Sue Hirsch, Sara Kirkman, Maxine Hatzung, Ruth Mueller; Precinct 3 - Linda Smith, Chair, Patricia Dill, Sherrill Estensen, Jane Andrews, Deidre Hedrick, Carol Bucklin, Patricia Schwartz, Barbara Bergan, Kathy Stiehm; Precinct 4 - Shirley Dibble, Chair, Rachel Schoening, Marjory Brothers, Marion Cracraft, Jeanette Lushine, Lois'Loomis, Patricia Murphy, Marianne Schoeneker, Theresa Carufel; Precinct 5 - Carol McPheeters, Chair, Rosemary McGlynn, Barbara Martin, Carolyn Setterberg, Margaret Williams, Sally Olson, Millie Karr, Phyllis Cooper, Marie Goblirsch; Precinct 6 - Jane Bains, Chair, Catherine Swanson, Mary Cleaveland, Barbara Berbers, Susan Zwakman, Elsie Scaife, Beverly Koch, Jean Flatten, Eleanor Westerberg; Precinct 7 - Helen Peterson, Chair, Kathleen Engquist, Gertrude Snoeyenbos, Lois Strupp, Janet Kanofsky, Delores Paul, Rosemary Freeman, Eunice Overby, Ellen Nein; Precinct 8 - Jane Moran, Chair, Myra Hykes, Barbara Melin, LuJean Swenson, Jeanne Sedoff, Lee Strang, Karen Daly, Ordell O'Neill, Barbara Edin; Precinct 9 - Eileen Konhauser, Chair, Florence Boughton, Patricia Monson, Marie Robinson, Barbara Butler, Joyce DeHarpporte, Bette Comstock, Colleen Crew, Beverly Deeds; Precinct 10 - Barbara Erlandson, Chair, Joann Lonergan, Sharon Hed, Mary Jo Permuth, Bette Goughner, Helen Connell, Clare Doyle, Nancy Sour, Ann Lathan; Precinct 11 - Sharon Lee Smith, Chair, Alice Burnell, Betty Pollitt, Delphiue Duff, Carol Melichar, Rita Acker, Lois Steinbeck, Mary Kirsch, Jean Mata; Precinct 12 - Karen Vickman, Chair, Carol Hite, Doris Marchuk, Carol Logan, Kathleen Hansing, JoAnne Chayer, Mary Scholz, Wynn Meeker, Lucetta Klos; Precinct 13 - Doris Peterson, Chair, Elaine Tollefsrud, Margaret Polta, Annadell Quantrell, Audrey Sherman, Shirley Renslow, Anne Matula, Pauline Mertes, Hattie Jackson; Precinct 14 - Mary Jane Platt, Chair, Joyce Hanson, Louise Carlson, Esther Olson, Donna Brastad, Mary Strother, Eva Bryan, Caroline Falstad, Lavayne Finberg; Precinct 15 Katherine Luikens, Chair, Jean Hare, Joann Buie, Carol Hanson, Patricia Robbins, Maxine Steinberg, Merry Krueger, Sheran McNulty, Carolyn Klus; Precinct 16' - Mary McDonald, Chair, Bonnie Bjerken, Pat Halvorson,.Bernadine Chapman, Donna Montgomery, Katherine Saunders, Marlys Chase, Nathalie Person, Rosemary Kostick, Mary Zotalis; Precinct 17 - Lorna Livingston, Chair; Jean McDermid, Louise Jackson, Mary Ryan, Myrtle Grette, Yvonne Ford, Virginia Todd, Ardell Davis, Marie Bachman; Precinct 19 - Charlotte Scanlon, Chair, Jane Hess, Audrey Nankivell, Betty Tickle, Erthel Johnson, Betty Smith, Linda Anderson, Ardis Dorsey, Jean Altman; Precinct 20 - Patricia Olander, Chair, Anita Delegard, Evelyn Herkal, Harriet Koch, Mary Vanek, Joan Ochs, Doris Clegg, Charlotte Burns, Eleanor Compton. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. *CONGRATUTATORY LETTER FOR COACH IKOLA APPROVED Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice for approval of a congratulatory letter to Willard Ikola who has been selected to be a member of the U.S.A. Hockey Hall of Fame. Motion carried on rollcall-vote, four ayes. *PETITION FOR SIDEWALK ON NORTH SIDE OF DEWEY HILL ROAD REFERRED TO ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice to refer the petition for sidewalk on the north side of Dewey Hill Road between Cahill Road and Delaney Boulevard to the Engineering Department for processing. ,Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. JOHN PERCELL OF ALLIANT TECH SYSTEMS INTRODUCED Mayor Richards introduced John Percell, Director of Public Affairs, Alliant Tech Systems. He explained that the company had been part of Honeywell Division and that as of today is a new spinoff company with their corporate headquarters to be in Edina. Mr. Percell gave a brief overview of the company's economic contribution to the state of Minnesota. *CIAIMS PAID Motion was made by Membe-k Kelly and was seconded by Member Rice to approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated 10/01/90 and consisting of 27 pages: General Fund $209,295.79, C.D.B.G. $60.00, Communications $1,041.23, Art Center $2,395.01, Capital Fund $1,291.00, Swimming Pool Fund $120.00, Golf Course Fund $35,670.90, Recreation Center Fund $13,808.79, Gun Range Fund $916.83, Edinborough Park $11,369.11, Utility Fund $246,373.69, Storm Sewer Utility $1,890.00, Liquor Dispensary Fund $23,329.66, Construction Fund $31,252.76, Total $578,814.77.' Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the meeting adjourned at 9:17 p.m. City Clerk �1 MINUTES OF TBE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 17, 1990 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Paulus, Rice, and Smith. Member Smith chaired the meeting. APPRECIATION AWARD PRESENTED TO DR. ALAN GREENWOOD Chairman Smith presented an award to Dr.:Alan Greenwood of Fairview Southdale Hospital in recognition and appreciation for his outstanding service to the Edina Fire Department Paramedic Training Program. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Rice to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented, with the exception of removal of Item V.A - Award -of Bid - Street Surfacing With Concrete Curb & Gutter Improvement No. BA -292 (Lincoln Drive). Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith Motion carried. ° PUBLIC HEARINGS CONDUCTED ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS: ASSESSMENTS LEVIED Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Due notice having been given, public hearings were conducted and action taken as hereinafter recorded on the following proposed assessments: 1. ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NO. L -33 Location: Eden Prairie Road from Kaymar Drive to Blake Road Analysis of assessment for Ornamental Street Lighting Improvement No. L -33 showed total construction cost of $3,939.21 proposed to be assessed against 69 assessable lots at $57.09 per lot, against estimated assessment of $71.13 per assessable lot. One year assessment to be paid in 1991. No objections were heard and no written objections to the proposed assessment were received prior hereto. Assessment for Ornamental Street Lighting Improvement No. L -33 approved by motion of Member Paulus, seconded by Member Rice and carried unanimously. (Assessment levied by resolution later in Minutes.) 2. ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NO. L -34 Location: Delaney Boulevard from Dewey Hill Road to West 78th Street Analysis of assessment for Ornamental Street Lighting Improvement No. L -34 showed total construction cost of $2,549.61 proposed to be assessed against 497 assessable units at $5.13 per unit, against estimated assessment of $17.43 per assessable unit. One year assessment to be paid in 1991. Engineer Hoffman explained that the cost was less than estimated because no sod replacement was needed because of the wet month of June. No objections were heard and no written objections to the proposed assessment were received prior hereto, Assessment for Ornamental Street Lighting Improvement No. L -34 approved by motion of Member Rice, seconded by Member Paulus and carried unanimously. (Assessment levied by resolution later in Minutes.) 3. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -282 Location: Apache Road and Indian Way West in Indian Hills West Addition Analysis of assessment for Street Improvement No. BA -282 showed total construction cost of $38,245.57 proposed to be assessed against 11 assessable parcels at $3,476. -87 per parcel, against estimated assessment of $3,333.23 per assessable parcel. Assessment to be spread over 10 years. No objections were heard and no written objections to the proposed assessment were received prior hereto.' Assessment for Street Improvement No. BA -282 approved by motion of Member Paulus, seconded by Member Rice and carried unanimously. (Assessment levied by resolution later in Minutes.), 4. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -283 Location: Blake Road from Vernon Avenue to Pine Grove Road Analysis of assessment for Street Improvement No. BA -283 showed total construction cost of $508,874.94 less $458,656.14 paid by State Aid funds for total amount to I be levied of $50,218.80 proposed to be assessed against 2,510.94 assessable linear feet at $20.00 per foot, against estimated assessment of $20.00 per assessable foot. Assessment to be spread over 10 years. No objections were heard and no written objections to the proposed assessment were received prior hereto. Assessment for Street Improvement No. BA -283 approved by motion of Member Paulus, seconded by Member Rice and carried unanimously. (Assessment levied by resolution later in Minutes.) 5. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -284 Location: Minnesota Drive from France Avenue to Edinborough Way Analysis of assessment for Street Improvement No. BA -284 showed total construction cost of $164,328.57 proposed to be assessed against 2,139,695 assessable square feet at $0.0768 per square foot, against estimated assessment of $0.1174 per assessable square foot. Assessment to be spread over 10 years. No objections were heard and no written objections to the proposed assessment were received prior hereto. Assessment for Street Improvement No. BA -284 approved by motion of Member Paulus, seconded by Member Smith and carried unanimously. (Assessment levied by resolution later in Minutes.) 6. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -287 Location: Fox Meadow Lane from existing cul -de -sac to 200 feet West Analysis of assessment for Street Improvement No. BA -287 showed total construction cost of $27,040.56 proposed to be assessed against 3 assessable lots at $9,013.52 per lot, against estimated assessment of $7,459.50 per assessable lot. Assessment to be spread over 10 years. Engineer Hoffman explained that the proposed assessment is higher than estimated because of extra work and brick on the driveways for the existing homes. 'He said two of the property owners proposed to be assessed had called and asked how the development process works. They were told that water, sewer, storm sewer, grading and graveling are done through the developer's agreement. The developer can petition the City to construct street improvements under the ten year assessment process. Their concern was that the developer might be going bankrupt. Engineer Hoffman said he told them that would have no bearing on the assessment process. No objections were heard and no written objections to the proposed assessment were received prior hereto. Assessment for Street Improvement No. BA -287 approved by motion of Member Rice, seconded by Member Paulus and carried unanimously. (Assessment levied by resolution later in Minutes.) 7. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -288 Location: Pinewood Trail from Sherwood Avenue to cul -de -sac Analysis of assessment for Street Improvement No. BA -288 showed total construction cost of $14,195.12 proposed to be assessed against 4 assessable lots at $3,548.78 per lot, against estimated assessment of $3,696.43 per assessable lot. Assessment to be spread over 10 years. No objections were heard and no written objections to the proposed as were received prior hereto. Assessment for Street Improvement No. BA -288 approved by motion of Member Smith, seconded by Member Rice and carried unanimously. (Assessment levied by resolution later in Minutes.) 8. MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. M -90 Location: 50th Street and France Avenue Business District Analysis of assessment for Maintenance Improvement No. M -90 showed total maintenance cost at $42,347.80 proposed to be assessed against 309,560 assessable square feet at $0.1368 per square foot. Engineer Hoffman pointed out that the assessment next year will include ramp maintenance and it is estimated that the assessment will increase by $.04 to $.05 per square foot. One year assessment to be paid in 1991. No objections were heard and no written objections to the proposed assessment were received prior hereto. Assessment for Maintenance Improvement No. M -90 approved by motion of Member Paulus, seconded by Member Smith and carried unanimously. (Assessment levied by resolution later in Minutes.) 9. WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -370 Location: Woodland Road to service 10 and 11 Woodland Road Analysis of assessment for Watermain Improvement No. WM -370 showed total construction at $7,300.44 proposed to be assessed against 2 assessable lots at $3,650.22 per lot, against estimated assessment of $2,602.64 per assessable lot. 4 Assessment.to be spread over 10 years. Engineer Hoffman explained that the property owners had petitioned the City to provide water service to 10 and 11 Woodland Road. No objections were heard and no written objections had been received prior hereto. Assessment for Watermain Improvement No. pM -370 approved by'motion of Member Rice, seconded by Member Paulus'aud carried unanimously. (Assessment levied by resolution later in Minutes.) 10. TREE REMOVAL PROJECT NO. TR -89 Locations: 5920 Amy Drive, 5820 Ashcroft Avenue, 4602 Cascade Lane, 5209 Halifax Avenue, 5528 Halifax Lane, 5330 France Avenue, 5813 Olinger Boulevard Analysis of assessment showed total cost at $3,215:50 proposed to be assessed against 7 assessable lots. Assessment to be spread over 3 years except that the assessment for 5528 Halifax Lane to be spread over 5 years. Park Director Kojetin explained that the,property owners had asked the City to remove diseased trees on private property and to assess the cost against their properties, with the work done by private contractors. David Balcom, 5528 Halifax Lane, said he objected to his proposed assessment because the contractor had damaged his back yard when removing the diseased tree. He stated that he had asked the City Forester not to pay the bill because of the bungled job. Manager Rosland suggested that action on the proposed assessment against 5528 Halifax Lane be held over to the next meeting so that the contractor could be contacted. Member Paulus moved to continue the hearing on the assessment for Tree Removal at 5528 Halifax Lane to October 1,. 1990. Motion seconded by Member Rice and - carried unanimously. No other objections were heard and no written objections had been received prior hereto. Assessment for Tree Removal Project No. TR -89, except for 5528 Halifax Lane, approved by motion -of Member Rice, seconded by Member Paulus and carried unanimously. (Assessment levied by resolution later in Minutes.) 11. AQUATIC WEED IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ -90 Location: Indianhead Lake Analysis of assessment for Aquatic Weed Improvement No. AQ -90 for Indianhead Lake showed total cost at $7,531.59 proposed to be assessed against 33 homes at $228.23 per home., One year assessment.payable in 1991. Location: Mill Pond Analysis of assessment for Aquatic Weed Improvement No. AQ -90 for Mill Pond showed total cost at $6,339.69 proposed to be assessed against 63 homes at $100.63 per home. One year assessment payable in 1991. Assistant Manager Hughes reported that he had received a phone call from the daughter of Mrs. Walter Flummerfelt, 4911 Sunnyside Road, advising that because of the shallow water the weed harvester was unable to get all the way in at the back of their property. He had advised her to write a letter to the Council concerning their objection. No other objections were heard and no. written objections had been received prior hereto. Assessment for Aquatic Weed Improvement No. AQ -90 approved by motion of Member Rice, seconded by Member Smith and carried unanimously. (Assessment levied by resolution later in Minutes.) Following the presentation of analysis of assessments and approval, Member Paulus introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS.LEVIED ON ACCOUNT OF VARIOUS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS BE.IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City has given notice of hearings as-required by law on the proposed assessment rolls for the improvements hereinafter referred to, and at such hearings held on September 17, 1990, has considered all oral and written objections presented against the levy of such assessments. 2. Each of the assessments as set forth in the assessment rolls on file in the office of the City Clerk for the following improvements:. Ornamental Street Lighting Improvement No. L -33 Ornamental- ,Street Lighting Improvement No. L -34 I Street Improvement No. BA -282 Street Improvement No. BA -283 Street Improvement No. BA -284 Street Improvement No. BA -287 Street Improvement No. BA -288 Maintenance Improvement No. N -90 Watermain Improvement No. WM -370 Tree Removal Project No. TR -89 Aquatic Weed Improvement No. AQ -90 does not exceed the local benefits conferred by said improvements upon the lot, tract or parcel of land so assessed, and all of said assessments are hereby - adopted and confirmed as the proper assessments on account of said respective improvements to be spread against the benefitted lots, parcels and tracts of land described therein. 3. The assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments, the first of said installments, together with interest at a rate of 9.0% per annum, on the entire assessment from the date hereof to December 31, 1991, to be payable with the general taxes for the.year 1991.. To each subsequent installment shall be added interest at the above rate for one year on all then unpaid installments. The number of such annual installments shall be as follows: Name of Improvement I Number of Installments ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NO. L -33 (Levy No. 11891) 1 year ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMNT NO. L -34 (Levy No. 11892) 1 year STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -282 (Levy No. 11896) 10 years STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -283 (Levy No. 11897) 10 years STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -284 (Levy No. 11898) 10 years STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -287 (Levy No. 11899) 10 years STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -288 (Levy No. 11900) 10 years MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. M -90 (Levy No. 11887) 1 year WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WN -370 (Levy No. 11895) 10 years TREE REMOVAL PROJECT NO. TR -89. (Levy No. 11893) 3 years AQUATIC WEED IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ -90 (Levy No. 11890) 1 year 4. The City Clerk shall forthwith prepare and transmit to the County Auditor a copy of this resolution and a certified duplicate of said assessments with each then unpaid installment and-interest set forth separately, to be extended on the tax lists of the County in accordance with this resolution. 5. The City Clerk shall also mail notice of any special assessment which may be payable by a county, by a political subdivision, or by the owner of any right -of -way as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.061, Subdivision 4, and if any such assessment is not paid in a,single installment, the City Treasurer shall arrange for collection thereof in installments, as set forth in said Section. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Rice. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith Resolution adopted. *PIIBLIC HEARING ON PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR BELFRY ADDITION (4243 GRIMES AVENUE) CONTINUED INDEFINITELY Notion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Rice to continue indefinitely the public hearing on preliminary plat approval for Belfry Addition - Lot 56, Morningside (4243 Grimes Avenue). Motion carried on rollcall vote,'three ayes.' *PUBLIC HEARING ON PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR FARRELLS PARKWOOD KNOLLS (5700 BLAKE ROAD) CONTINUED TO 10/15/90 Notion was made.by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Rice to continue the public hearing on preliminary plat approval for Farrells Park Wood Knolls - Tract A, R.L..S. 1286 (5700 Blake Road) to October 15, 1990. Motion carried on rollcall vote, three ayes. PUBLIC HEARING ON AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 825 SECTION 7.D - CUSTOMARY HOME OCCUPATIONS CONTINUED TO 10115/90 Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by.Member Rice to continue the public hearing on the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No. 825, Section 7.D - Customary Home Occupations to October 15, 1990. Motion carried on rollcall vote, three ayes. BID AWARDED FOR STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO BA -292 (LINCOLN DRIVE) Member Rice asked if there were only two property owners who had petitioned for the street surfacing project and if they were the sole property owners who would be assessed for the improvement. Engineer Hoffman stated that was correct. Member Rice made a motion for award of bid for Street Surfacing With Concrete Curb & Gutter Improvement No. BA -292 (Lincoln Drive) to recommended low bidder, Northwest Asphalt, at $61,060.70. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith Motion carried. *BID AWARDED FOR BOILER ROOM INSULATION Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for boiler room insulation at City Hall to recommended low bidder, Gagnon, Incorporated, at $6,315.00. Motion carried on rollc'all vote, three ayes. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF 9/11/90 APPROVED• SPEED LIMITS ON FRANCE AV FROM I -494 TO W. 54TH TO BE REVIEWED AFTER COMPLETION OF FRANCE AV CONSTRUCTION Member Rice moved approval of the following recommended action listed in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of September 11, 1990: 1) To ban parking from the intersection of Edgebrook Place and Browndale Avenue to continue 50' north of the intersection, 2) To place 25 m.p.h. advisory pedestrian signing on northbound Mark Terrace Drive at,L.och Moor'Drive and southbound at Valley View Road,.and to suggest that the neighborhood pass out flyers to the area expressing their concerns, 3) To check the intersection of West 65th Street and Drew Avenue for possible clearview violations, to install "HOSPITAL ZONE" signing in the area, and to paint a crosswalk.from the southeast to the northeast corners, pending signalization review by the City, 4) To hold on the recommendation that the Council pass a resolution to Hennepin County requesting speed studies to be conducted on France Avenue from I -494 to West 54th Street until after completion of the France Avenue construction, 5) To suggest to MOOT that they review the Eden Avenue ramp to southbound Highway 100 with consideration as to widening and lengthening the ramp to allow two parallel lanes to merge into one farther down the ramp, and to acknowledge Sections B and C of the Minutes. Motion for approval was seconded by Member Paulus. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith Motion carried REPORT PRESENTED ON SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND APARTMENT RECYCLING• COUNCIL TO REVIEW MULTI - FAMILY RECYCLING PROGRAM IN ONE YEAR Manager Rosland recalled that at the Council meeting of September 4, several questions were raised regarding options for recycling and garbage collection and the costs of the various systems. Janet Chandler, Recycling Coordinator, presented a report on basic information on solid waste collection systems as well as staff suggestions regarding the apartment recycling program summarized as follows. Solid Waste Components Solid waste now handled separately include garbage, recyclables, compostable yard waste and hazardous waste. Garbage haulers are providing separate pickup for the first three listed. Collection of hazardous waste requires certain permits., 1L licenses and insurance provisions and therefore these materials are picked up by specialized haulers or may be taken to drop -off locations. Collection Systems Organized Collection - City contracts with hauler or group of haulers to provide service for whole city or sections of city. Districting - City designates the pickup day within each district. Haulers may have customers in any or all district but must provide service on designated day. Open Hauling - Haulers can service any area of city, property owners may choose hauler. City Operated - City crews perform the service using city trucks. Service Categories by Property Type Residential - Single family homes and others with individual hauling service. Multi - family - Apartments and condominiums, centralized dumpster service. Commercial - All non - residential, dumpster service. Haulers classify multi - family buildings as "commercial" since these buildings have dumpster service`for garbage. Edina's 13 haulers are licensed to serve all property types; however, only five provide service for residential customers. Comparison of Collection Systems A comparison of collection systems was given as to costs, legal requirements, Hennepin County policy, City ordinances, environmental considerations and public policy concerns. It was noted that to set up Organized Collection the Minnesota Waste Management Act requires cities to follow a set procedure beginning 180 days before implementation. Although not legally required, it may be advisable to follow a similar procedure to set up a Districting system. Apartment Recycling 1991 Staff has worked with the haulers, apartment owners /managers since April to set up a recycling system per ordinances recently adopted. Haulers and managers are moving ahead to start programs by January 1. There has been general approval on the system, with the only concern being the issue of funding. The suggestion was made that the City could contract for recycling service for apartments as well as single family homes and put this in place by January, 1991. Staff would recommend not to provide this service for 1991 but to move ahead with the program as originally planned. Per Hennepin County policy, the $5 per unit container will be the only funding the county will provide for apartments. If the City were to provide this service it would have to cover the entire cost. This issue could be addressed in the context of a study of solid waste collection options, looking to 1992 for implementation of any changes. Apartment Recycling Incentive Program Upon Council approval, a_ program could be set up to provide partial funding for apartment recycling in 1991 as follows: - When recycling programs are set up the owners or associations would register their program with the City. - The City would verify that the program is up and running and issue a one -time incentive payment. Assuming an average recycling cost of $1 per unit per month, 20% funding for 1991 would cost about $20,000. A $5 per unit payment would cost about $38,000. Funds could be designated for this program from an anticipated surplus in the 1990 recycling budget. A surplus of approximately $50,000 is expected since Hennepin County has agreed to fund 80% of the total $2.45 per household recycling cost for garage service rather than 80% of the curbside cost. Options for Council Consideration 1) Set a public hearing date to start the process for Organized Collection. 2) Direct staff to prepare a. Districting plan and determine if there are any legal requirements that must be meta 3) Study the issues further and bring back additional information in 1991. 4) Take no action at this time. Recycling Alternatives for Council Consideration 1) Approve continuation of present system with a City contract for all residential buildings of eight units or less for 1991. 2) Provide a start -up incentive for apartment /condominium recycling in buildings of more than eight units to be- funded by'the anticipated $50,000 surplus in the current recycling budget. 3) Direct staff to include multi - family buildings with more than eight units in the City recycling contract for 1991, or study the issue further. Staff Recommendations 1) To study further options for solid waste collection systems, including apartment recycling and funding issues. 2) Proceed with apartment recycling plans as directed in ordinances for 1991. 3) Provide a start -up incentive payment for apartments and condominiums. (Mayor Richards entered the meeting at 8:15 p.m. during the presentation.) The Council discussed-the 'issue of the apartment recycling ,incentive program and generally felt that some type of incentive program should be considered. However, it was the consensus that further study and analysis should be conducted during 1991 to better determine costs to the multi - family buildings before taking any action. Member Paulus made a motion that the Council review in one year the multi- family recycling program. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Richards, Smith Motion carried. It was the consensus of the Council that staff should bring back early in 1991 further data on the options for solid waste collection systems. No other formal action was taken. TENNIS COURTS AT COMMUNITY CENTER DISCUSSED Manager Rosland recalled that the condition of the tennis courts at the Edina Community Center had been mentioned previously by,Member Rice. Early in 1990 the Edina Park Board had been asked to consider funding half of the projected amount necessary to resurface the Edina Community Center courts ($19,250) because the Park and Recreation Department runs summer tennis programs, lessons and tournaments for the community on these courts. The Council had requested information regarding the use of the courts by the Park and Recreation Department and also the total amount that is available in the Developer's Fund. The Park and Recreation Department use of the Edina Community Center courts is approximately 600 hours per year. The balance'in the Developer's Fund, including amounts to be received, is $384,200. Mayor Richards commented that there are several other issues-to be discussed with the Edina School District (tax increment rebate and school bus garage) and suggested that it would make sense to look at all the issues at the same time. It was the consensus of the Council that Manager Rosland arrange"a meeting between City and School District officials and staff and that the issue of the tennis courts be discussed at such time. REPORT GIVEN ON ENTRY MONUMENTS - 50TH AND FRANCE BUSINESS DISTRICT Assistant Manager Hughes recalled that on June 4, 1990 the Council held a public hearing on the 50th and France Renovation Project. At that time Peter Jarvis, BRW; presented graphics that showed the improvements that were envisioned. The Council approved the project but asked that Mr. Jarvis return when the design of the entry monuments and the main focal area are defined. Over the last few months Mr. Jarvis and his staff and City staff have worked with the 50th and France Business and Professional Association concerning the design and have agreed on a proposed design solution for those two area. Peter Jarvis, BRW, made board presentations for three entry monuments illustrating a gateway design. He pointed out that the monument for the focal area would be larger than the monuments at the north entry to the business district (north of the proposed Walgreens), at the south entry (Americana Bank) and at the west entry (northwest corner of Lunds parking lot). The basic color would be forest green with a logo design approved by the 50th and France Association and would consist of a double set of four inch pipes extending upward and rounded at the top set in a substantial base. In between the four inch set of pipes would be a continuous band of light, possibly fiber optic, with a metal banner in form of a ribbon the color of royal purple. It was concluded that the focal area (the present carillon tower area) has a lot happening there and there was no reason to have another vertical element. The fountain is proposed to be refurbished, the carillon tower will be removed and comfortable metal seating surrounding the fountain on three sides is proposed. Formal planting of large, lacey honey locust trees are planned with pots of seasonal flowers and light fixtures to match the new pedestrian and street lighting in the business district. Assistant Manager Hughes stated that the entry monuments would be part of the bid package that will be brought to the Council with the other proposed improvements for the 50th and France Business District within the next few months. APPOINTMENT TO SHHSC BOARD TO BE MADE 10/1/90 It was informally agreed to. hold over the appointment to the South Hennepin Human Services Council Board to the meeting of October 1, 1990 when a full Council would be present. *HEARING DATE OF 10/15/90 SET FOR WINE/BEER LICENSE FEES Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Rice setting October 15, 1990 as hearing date for a proposed increase in wine and beer license fees. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL REGIONAL BREAKFAST MEETINGS DISCIISSED Manager Rosland reminded the Council of Metropolitan Council Regional Breakfast Meetings on September 19 and October 3.' Member Rice stated he would attend, the September 19 meeting and Mayor Richards said he could attend the October 3 meeting. The Council identified several issues on which they felt the Metropolitan Council should take a leadership role: 1) Solid Waste Collection and Recycling, and 2) Light Rail Transit and the related Rapid Transit Board. I -494 JOINT POWERS ORGANIZATION TO HIRE CONSULTANT Member Paulus reported as Chair of the I -494 JPO that they have agreed to hire a consultant parttime (20 hours per week) for a one year period to work on organizing the Travel Demand Management component.. Applications are now being taken with interviews to be conducted by the five staff members with the goal of having an individual in place by November'l. The parttime position will be funded $10,500 from the general budget with the second $10,500 from grant money. 1989 ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT DISCUSSED The Council Members raised several questions concerning the 1989 Annual Financial Report for the City of Edina as follows. Reference in the April 27, 1990 letter (page 2) to the Mayor and Council from the City Manager concerning "several external areas of concern which may require special attention by the mayor and members of the City Council during the present fiscal period." Manager Rosland explained that the reference was to major .)a property tax changes adopted by the State Legislature and a new comparable worth bill that was passed which will again create some additional problems. Reference in the April 27, 1990 letter (page 126) to the Mayor and Council from KPMG Peat Marwick to "certain matters involving the internal control structure and its operation that we have reported to the management of the City of Edina, Minnesota in a separate letter dated April 27, 1990." Finance Director Wallin explained that Peat Marwick will be sending a management letter that will recommend certain procedures to address the matters involving the internal control structure. Member Smith suggested that if the Council Members had further questions concerning the audit report that they contact the Manager or Finance Director. Manager Rosland commented that he was pleased with the results of the audit and the fact that the.General Fund showed that total expenditures for 1989 were under budget by $164,400. Excess of revenues over expenditures was $479,296 for a surplus fund balance as of December 31, 1989 of $1,579,247. The Enterprise Funds showed operating income before depreciation with the exception of Edinborough Park which showed an operating loss of approximately $12,000. Member Smith commented that overall there was a significant turnaround on operating income over the year 1988. CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Rice to approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated 09/17/90 and consisting of 28 pages: General Fund $837,943.72, Communications,$5,582.53, Art Center $5,710.89, Swimming Pool Fund $566.85, Golf Course Fund $26,534.66, Recreation Center Fund $4,321.43, Gun Range Fund $328.03, Edinborough Park $8,550.63, Utility Fund $16,111.22, Storm Sewer Utility $2,598.12, Liquor Dispensary Fund $103,632.21, Construction Fund $137,220.90, Total $1,149,101.19 and for confirmation of payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated 08/31/90 and consisting of 21 pages: General Fund $538,102.95, Communications $488.40, Art Center $1,181.58, Swimming Pool Fund $3,307.58, Golf Course Fund $20,841.61, Recreation Center Fund $12,249.94, Gun Range Fund $350.58, Edinborough Park $10,624.41,. IItility Fund $39,956.54, Storm Sewer Utility $749.71, Liquor Dispensary Fund $338,991.78, Construction Fund $4,414.52, Total $1,022,259.60. Motion carried on rollcall vote, three ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Chairman Smith declared the meeting adjourned at 9:25 p.m. City Clerk LAW OFFICES LEONARD, STREET AND DEINARD Mr. Frederick Richards, Mayor Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Application of Richard Belfry for Subdivision of Lot at 4243 Grimes Avenue South Dear Mayor Richards: Mr. Belfry has lived at 4243 Grimes Avenue South for approximately 12 years. Mr. Belfry loves his neighborhood and strongly desires to remain there. He also would like to live in a new house. The only way Mr. Belfry can afford to do this is to subdivide his existing 100 -foot wide lot into two 50 -foot wide lots and sell his old house. Under the Edina Zoning Code, a 75 -foot minimum lot width is required. Thus, the proposed subdivision requires a variance from the minimum lot width requirement. For the reasons which follow, we urge the City Council to approve the proposed subdivision. The vast majority of lots in this area of Edina consist of 50- foot wide lots. Of the 113 single family lots in the 500 -foot neighborhood surrounding Mr. Belfry's property (the "Property ") only 11 lots remain as undivided 100 -foot wide lots similar to Mr. Belfry's. The other lots have been previously subdivided. Following the filing of his application for subdivision approval, Mr. Belfry did not make the rounds in the neighborhood and explain his proposal to the neighbors. This was clearly a mistake on Mr. Belfry's part. Fearing the worst, and not knowing quite what-to expect, many neighbors signed a petition and wrote letters in opposition to the proposed subdivision. While the lanning staff recommended approval of the subdivision based upon P SUITE 2300 MICHAEL L. VERDE WILLIAM L D/ILEWE BIDNCY LORB[P• ROBERT LEWIS SARROWS' LOWELL V. [TORT: B GRLCMSWAG STEVEN L. BELTOM P[T[P M BACHYAM SIDMr BARROWS* • CENT t RICHEY RICHARD J. WEGENER 150 SOUTH FIFTH STREET DOUGLAS [LLCM G. SAMPSON MARL D SIY PEON MANDLO O. i1LLD. JN I. SALRE' MUGMY MAYNARD• MINNESOTA 55402 MARGARET M. VAN VALKEIISUNG SHAUN MCELMATTON B[RTRAMD ALLEN THOMAS D RIMSENG' VNLDERIC■ W MORRIS MINNEAPOLIS, ROSAMNL NATHANSOM JAMES J MARK W DELEHANTY MORRIS M BHLPYAM' MORRG[PLlllr• JOHN C [UEMM BRADLEY J TELEPHONE (612) 335 -1500 SNERRI L. KNUTH MICNALL G.TAVLOP PETER E. SCHIISKY GCO -GRLAN MICHAEL A MERICN• JOHN W GETSINGER LAWRENCE P. SCHACRP CMAR LES R DAYTON BNAMD• FACSIMILE (612) 335 -1657 THOMAS P. SANDERS RONALD J. SCHULTZ DAV10A COX' STEPHEN R. PiLAUM' MARTHA DAVID M HAYNES ROBERT EEOLOVITCH CAROLYN V. WOLSKI STEVEN J. PINDSIG CHARLES A PATS' CAROLYN CHALMERS • TIMOTHY WELCH GREGG J CAVANAGM JAVA M RR13 LOWELLJ MOTLSODM• r. MCDUNNIGLE. JR.• JAMES V ROTH ROBERT L D. MAY GREGORY C. BROWN GEORGE RICHARD G PCP-". JR ANGLLA M. BOHMANN SUSAN M. ROBIMER DEBRA G. STREMLOW GEORGE B LEONARD 11072.19561 iRLDPIC T ROBE MBLAT• ROBERT P TNAVIS' JAMES G BULLARD P[O[R A. CARSON L M STREET 119 BYROM C. !r►RMS' H. MERMAN JOSEPH M rINLEY' December 14, 1990 MICHAEL R. COHEN 196911 SR DEINARO 11099.19691 BENEDI S O[1MAPD 11096 19051 JOHN STEVEN D OtPUYTEP' LAWRENCE J iIELO MAMCT WILTGEM REISERT AMOS AMOS JAMS R DORSEr DAVID W. KELLEY VIRGINIA B COME GTHARIME BOSCHCE KATHLEEN M. GRAHAM MAP. S WEITZ' "AVID L. LILLEHAUG MICHELLE A MILLER IRENE SCOTT STE PMEN J DAVIDSON* STEPHEN R LITMAN' DAVID KANTOR TIM07MY P. MEYERSON OANIEL D i07M DANIEL Y SATORIUS DAVID C )PLR- ANGELA M. CHRISTY JLNMIiER R. PARR OT COVKK• COWARD Y. MOERSiELDER' MAR.A LINDGREN SLAKE SHEPARD. JR. •Kwo.tAAONU IpPRwATq+A WRITERS DIRECT DIAL NUMBER (612) 335 -1862 Mr. Frederick Richards, Mayor Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Application of Richard Belfry for Subdivision of Lot at 4243 Grimes Avenue South Dear Mayor Richards: Mr. Belfry has lived at 4243 Grimes Avenue South for approximately 12 years. Mr. Belfry loves his neighborhood and strongly desires to remain there. He also would like to live in a new house. The only way Mr. Belfry can afford to do this is to subdivide his existing 100 -foot wide lot into two 50 -foot wide lots and sell his old house. Under the Edina Zoning Code, a 75 -foot minimum lot width is required. Thus, the proposed subdivision requires a variance from the minimum lot width requirement. For the reasons which follow, we urge the City Council to approve the proposed subdivision. The vast majority of lots in this area of Edina consist of 50- foot wide lots. Of the 113 single family lots in the 500 -foot neighborhood surrounding Mr. Belfry's property (the "Property ") only 11 lots remain as undivided 100 -foot wide lots similar to Mr. Belfry's. The other lots have been previously subdivided. Following the filing of his application for subdivision approval, Mr. Belfry did not make the rounds in the neighborhood and explain his proposal to the neighbors. This was clearly a mistake on Mr. Belfry's part. Fearing the worst, and not knowing quite what-to expect, many neighbors signed a petition and wrote letters in opposition to the proposed subdivision. While the lanning staff recommended approval of the subdivision based upon P 1. Mr. Frederick Richards, Mayor December 14, 1990 Page 2 the policies in the City's Comprehensive Plan, the compatibility of the proposal with the surrounding neighborhood, and the past actions of the City in approving similar subdivisions, the Planning Commission reacted to the neighborhood opposition and recommended denial of the subdivision. In the past several weeks, Mr. Belfry has gone door -to -door in the neighborhood whenever time allowed and has explained his proposal to everyone that he was able to reach. As a result, many neighbors have now signed a petition in favor of the subdivision, including neighbors who had previously signed the petition in opposition to the development. Some people, of course, will oppose any change to their neighborhood, but the fact is that Mr. Belfry's proposed new home is completely compatible with the architecture, ambience and character of the neighborhood. There is no evidence whatsoever that the subdivision will adversely affect neighborhood property values. His proposed siting of the house with a substantial setback from the streetfront carefully preserves all of the existing large trees and shrubs on the front of the lot. In addition, Mr. Belfry is quite willing to agree to additional reasonable design standards for the home so as to assure the City and his neighbors of his intentions. Since the time that the Morningside area was annexed by Edina, there have been three applications for subdivision of 100 -foot wide lots. Two of these applications, which are virtually indistinguishable from Mr. Belfry's Application, were granted by the City. The third application was recommended for approval by planning staff and by the Planning Commission, but was voted down on the three -to -two vote by the City Council. The decision of the City Council in that matter is reflected in the minutes of the meeting, however, the Council made no specific findings to support its decision. The weight of evidence in the record (other than neighborhood opposition which is not a sufficient reason to deny a subdivision) clearly supports the subdivision. For whatever reason, the decision of the City Council in that matter was not challenged or appealed, and we believe it has no precedential value given the two prior decisions which are supported by strong staff and Planning Commission recommendations and findings. As a purely legal matter, it is my opinion that the City is required to approve Mr. Belfry's Application for subdivision approval. Indeed, there are four separate legal grounds, each of which requires the City to approve this subdivision: 1. The City is Required by the Metropolitain Land Planning - --- __ 1-10A 1T1 ltS Mr. Frederick Richards, Mayor December 14, 1990 Page 3 As staff noted in the Staff Report related to this matter, the Comprehensive Plan contains a number of policies which apply to this proposal. These policies generally support the proposed subdivision. In fact, one of the policies is very specific and provides as follows: "[The City shall] maintain existing single family lot and building minimums. However, establish a secondary single family zoning classification that allows for reduced minimum lot and building requirements based on neighborhood characteristics." This policy clearly states the intention of the City to establish a reduced minimum lot size where such lot size is consistent with the surrounding neighborhood. Given this policy, MINN. STAT. § 473.865, subd. 1 (1990) , requires the City to adopt zoning amendments in conformance with this policy. That section provides as follows: "Each local governmental unit shall adopt official controls as described in its adopted comprehensive plan . . . ". An "official control" means a zoning ordinance. Minn. Stat. § 473.852, subd. 9. Clearly the City's Comprehensive Plan calls for a secondary single family zoning classification that allows for reduced minimum lot widths. Given the unambiguous nature of the Comprehensive Plan, the City is obligated by statute to implement that policy. It is only because the City has failed to adopt the ordinances required in its Comprehensive Plan that a variance is required in this case. The City cannot now use the 75- foot lot width requirement to deny this subdivision. 2. Denial by the City Violates the Applicant's Rights to E ual Protection Under the Constitution. The requirements of the Equal Protection clauses of the State and Federal Constitutions are clear. Quite simply, these clauses require (in the land use context) that similarly situated persons must be treated similarly. See Odell V. City of Eagan, 348 N.W.2d 796 (Ct. App. 1984). In this case, Mr. Belfry is similarly situated to the prior subdivisions which have been approved in this neighborhood by the City of Edina and is also similarly situated to all those 50 -foot wide lots surrounding his home. He is entitled to what other people similarly situated have received. 3. The law is clear that under certain circumstances where municipalities have engaged in wrongful conduct, that they will be estopped from relying on that wrongful conduct to Mr. Frederick Richards, Mayor December 14, 1990 Page 4 grant or deny approvals. See Ridgewood Development v. State of Minnesota, 294 N.W.2d 288 (Minn. 1980). In Mr. Belfry's case, the City wrongfully failed to adopt the official controls in accordance with its Comprehensive from denying red by statute. It is therefore estopped an application for subdivision approval that is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. The staff findings clearly demonstrate that Mr. Belfry's proposal is in accordance with the policies in the Comprehensive Plan. 4. A roval of the Proposed Subdivision is Reauired by the Subdivision Uniformity Statute. Minnesota statutes governing the procedure for subdivision regulations provide in relevant part as follows: "The [subdivision] regulations shall be uniform for each class or kind of subdivision." This statutory provision clearly embodies a legislative intent that subdivisions be uniform in their requirements. To allow almost all lots in a subdivision to be 50 of feet in width, uniformity and is t odds with the intent oft principle the legislature. Mr. Belfry only wants what his neighbors have already been allowed. His proposal is completely in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and in accordance with past actions ncil. The law of the Cit he Cou reasons set forth reuires approval of his above, we respectfullyaurgecyou to Based on t approve the proposed subdivision. PHB /dm cc: Ms. Ms. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Peggy Kelly Jane Paulus Bernard Rice Glenn Smith Craig Larsen Richard Belfry Very truly yours, LEONARD, STREET AND DEINARD By Peter H. Bachman I i, 4 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KENNETH ROSLAND From: CRAIG LARSEN Date: DECEMBER 17, 1990 Subject: S -90 -4, PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL, BELFRY ADDITION. Recommendation: Agenda Item # IV. A. Consent ❑ Information Only F Mgr . Recommends E To HRA E To Council Action © Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion The Planning Commission recommends denial of the proposed preliminary plat. Info /Background The Planning Commission considered this request for subdivision at its August 29, 1990, meeting. The Council hearing was delayed until now at the proponents request. Notices for this hearing were mailed on December 7, 1990. The two lots which would result from a subdivision of this property would have a lot width of 50 feet. Since the proposed lot widths are less than the minimum requirement of 75 feet, a lot width variance of 25 feet is required for each lot. Presently, with a lot width of 100 feet, the lot conforms to zoning ordinance requirements. In considering the requested variance -the - Planning Commission focused on the existing conditions along Grimes Avenue between West 42nd Street and Morningside Road. This block originally contained 22, 100 foot wide lots. Twelve of those lots remain undivided. Although within the 500 foot neighborhood only 11 of the 113 remain undivided 100 foot wide lots, most of the undivided lots are on this block of Grimes Avenue. The Planning Commission found that a hardship was not demonstrated and that the requested variance should be denied. Reasons for denial of the preliminary plat and requested lot width variances. 1. Strict enforcement ,of the Zoning Ordinance does not cause an undue hardship or.prevent a reasonable use of the property. The property is now used and may continue to be used as a single family,lot. 2. Character and symmetry of the existing neighborhood will be harmed by the proposed subdivision; and approving the, proposed subdivision would alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Further, the proposed subdivision would set an undesirable precedent for further subdivision on this block of Grimes Avenue. 3. Property owners in the vicinity have a right to rely on a filed plat for the area and may rightly presume that any replat will be in a manner suitable and compatible with surrounding properties. �s�rter dale aye Commissioner Faust: aye Commissioner L. Johnson: aye Commissioner McClelland: aye Commissioner Palmer: aye Commissioner Shaw: aye Commissioner Ingwalson: aye Commissioner Byron: aye Chairman Johnson: aye Motion carried,•9 -0. III. NEW BUSINESS. - -.._ t.. rt...:_.... IXO q` S -90 -5 Preliminary Plat Approval Belfry. Addition Lot 56, Morningside 4243 Grimes Avenue Mr. Larsen presented his staff report noting the subject property is a developed single family lot measuring 100 feet by 200 feet with a area of 20,000 square feet. The proposed subdivision would create one, new lot. Each of the resulting lots would measure 50 feet by 200 feet and contain 10,000 square feet of area. Mr. Larsen explained the proposed lot width of 50 feet,is less than the 75 minimum lot width required by the Zoning Ordinance. Thus, a 25 foot lot width variance is required for each lot. Mr. Larsen pointed out there are 113 single family lots in the 500 foot neighborhood surrounding the subject property. The median lot width is 50 feet, the median depth is 200 feet and the median lot area is 10,000 square feet. The dimensions and area of the proposed lots are the same as in the 500 foot neighborhood.- Continuing, Mr. Larsen said the subject Morningside plat. Lots in this original However, most have since been subdivide Within the 500 neighborhood only 11 undivided 100 foot wide lots. Most of prior to annexation of Morningside by 7 property is part of the plat were 100 feet wide. d into 50 foot wide- -lots. of the 113 lots remain the lots were subdivided Edina in 1966. Since annexation two lots have been subdivided,. one in 1972 and one in 1978. In 1984 the City Council denied proposed subdivision on this block of Grimes Avenue. Concluding, Mr. Larsen said a 50 foot wide lot is typical in most of the Morningside neighborhood. The dimensions and size of the proposed lots are identical to the median average of the 500 foot neighborhood. Eighty -seven of the 113 lots in the neighborhood are 50 feet wide. Staff recommends approval of the Subdivision and lot width variance conditioned on: * Final Plat Approval * Subdivision Dedication The proponent, Mr. Belfry and his surveyor Randy Stern were present. Interested neighbors were present. Mr. Belfry told the Commission he has owned and inhabited this home for 12 years. He asked the neighbors present to accept his apology for not informing them in. person regarding his request. He explained he has been very busy with a sick relative. Continuing, Mr. Belfry noted, in his opinion, the construction of an. additional single family home would not create a negative impact on traffic or on the neighborhood. He pointed.out he owns one home out of the neighborhood of 113 homes, and the proposed new house would be an improvement and value enhancement for the entire neighborhood, not only him. He indicated he is aware that a number of persons in the neighborhood do not favor this proposal and asked the Commission to come to a favorable conclusion regarding his request to subdivide. Mr. Randy Stern told the Commission he believes the numbers regarding this subdivision speak for themselves. He pointed out the newly created lot meets the average lot size of this neighborhood and asked the Commission to note that previous subdivisions have occurred within this neighborhood, one being immediately next door and across the street. Neighbors who spoke in opposition to the proposal presented by Mr. Belfry, and their opinions are noted as follows: * Mr. Bob Christianson, 4247 Grimes Avenue, submitted to the Commission a petition with signatures of neighbors who oppose the proposed subdivision, continuing Mr. Christianson said he observed that even though the proposed subdivision meets the average lot size in the neighborhood 11 lots on this block alone are over 100 feet in width, so in reality, the proposed lot is out of character with the immediate neighborhood. 10 * Ms. Helen Burke, 4246 Grimes Avenue, told the Commission Mr. Belfry is a good neighbor, who keeps his yard up, but noted there are many large lots within this block, three next door, three -di,rectly across the street, that are larger than the average of\the neighborhood, thus the character and symmetry of this block would• be negatively impacted if development were allowed. Ms. Burke also noted the trees, and hedges that would have to, be removed to accommodate construction of a new house. * Ms. Annette Christianson, 4247 Grimes Avenue, told the Commission she moved out of.an inner city neighborhood, and looked for over a year and a half to find a neighborhood she could be comfortable in,, with wonderful character. She found that neighborhood in Morningside. She said she would never have purchased their present home if they knew a subdivision would occur right next door. She pointed out new construction of a house would require a' variance, and result in a feeling of crowding. Ms. Christianson said she believes the lots were developed to remain large. She cautioned against setting a precedent that would affect the whole neighborhood. She asked the Commission to note the number of signatures appearing on a petition opposing the proposed subdivision. *Mr. Scheme, 4234 Grimes Avenue, told the Commission he was encouraged by their denial of a subdivision in 1984 on Grimes Avenue. He pointed out the neighborhood is stable and a trend to subdivide may start if approval is granted. *Ms. Missen, 4242 Grimes reported she has lived in her house for 42 years and it is her investment in the future. She said at the present she looks at a beautiful lawn and asked the Commission to deny Mr. Belfry's request to subdivide. *John Kalanchik, 4114 Morningside Road, asked the Commission to note this neighborhood is established, if subdivision were approved the. character of the neighborhood would be compromised, a precedent would be set and a monetary gain for one person would be realized. *Mr. Greg Silris, 4246 Grimes, questioned if a person can do .what they want with their property even if the majority of persons in the neighborhood are hurt by the subdivision? *Mr. Clarence Velgersdyk, 4238 Grimes, said the 1984 subdivision denial should be upheld, any subdivision would be detrimental to the neighborhood. He pointed out the loss of open space, increased density, precedent 11 setting, and violation of neighborhood character and symmetry. Commissioner McClelland told the Commission that while she can foresee a potential problem resulting from the previously granted subdivisions within the immediate area, her belief is that if this subdivision request were to be approved, control would be completely lost in this neighborhood which would result in a total violation of the present character and symmetry. She concluded in all good faith she cannot support the request to subdivide this parcel of property. Commissioner Palmer told the Commission he agrees with Commissioner McClellands observations, adding that while the proposed lot meets the neighborhood standards, it is important to note that the immediate area, and this immediate block of Grimes, contain a large number of lots 100 feet in width. He pointed out this one block is unique. within the Morningside area and preservation of this uniqueness should be carefully reviewed. He added the neighborhood character in this instance, may not have been established by the 500 foot rule of thumb, but by this particular, 4200 block of Grimes. Mr. Palmer concluded that he cannot support the subdivision request. Commisioner Hale supported Commissioner ' McClelland's and Commissioner Palmer's opinion and added another point that should be considered is the setting of an unwanted precedent. Commissioner Palmer moved to recommend denial of the preliminary plat. Commissioner Hale seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. S -90 -6 Preliminary Plat Approval Farrell's Parkwood Knolls James and Linda Farrell 5700 Blake Road Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the subject property is a developed single family lot containing an area of 95,700 square feet, or 2.2 acres. The existing dwelling is located in the central portion of.the lot. Mr. Larsen pointed out before them this evening is a revision to the plan previously submitted. The revised plan depicts two lots instead of the proposed three lots. Mr. Larsen concluded staff would recommend preliminary approval 12 LOCATION MAP i7 li Wa ■ ♦4 , all f jk CALVIN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL 111 1■1 � t', ��: IaN VIII 1111 ■1 lilll� �■ ���, ,_ �o MA- MORNIN SUBDIVISIONL NUMBER s -90 -5 L O C A T 10 N 4243 Grimes Avenue REQUEST Create one new buildable lot i �CY EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT a a .. all f jk CALVIN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL 111 1■1 � t', ��: IaN VIII 1111 ■1 lilll� �■ ���, ,_ �o MA- MORNIN SUBDIVISIONL NUMBER s -90 -5 L O C A T 10 N 4243 Grimes Avenue REQUEST Create one new buildable lot i �CY EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AUGUST 29, 1990 5 -90 -5 Preliminary Plat Approval Belfry Addition Lot 56, Morningside 4243 Grimes Avenue The subject property is a developed single family lot measuring 100 feet by 200 feet with a area of 20,000 square feet. The proposed subdivision would create one, new lot. Each of the resulting lots would measure 50 feet by 200 feet and contain 10,000 square feet of area. The proposed lot width of 50 feet is less than the 75 minimum lot width required by the Zoning Ordinance. Thus, a 25 'foot lot width variance is required for each lot. There are 113 single family lots in the 500 foot neighborhood surrounding the 'subject property. The median lot width is 50 feet, the median depth 'is 200 feet and the median lot area is 10,000 square feet. The dimensions and area of the proposed lots are the same as in the "500 foot neighborhood. The subject property is part of the Morningside plat. Lots in this original plat were 100 feet wide. However, most have since been subdivided into 50 foot wide lots. Within the 500 neighborhood only 11 of the 113 lots remain undivided 100 foot wide lots. Most of the lots were subdivided prior to annexation of Morningside by Edina in 1966. Since annexation two lots have been subdivided, one in 1972 and one in 1978. In 1984 the City Council denied proposed subdivision on this block of Grimes Avenue. Recommendation A 50 foot wide lot is typical in most of the Morningside neighborhood. The dimensions and size of the proposed lots are identical to the median average of the 500 foot neighborhood. Eighty -seven of the 113 lots in the neighborhood are 50 feet wide. The Comprehensive Plan contains the following policies.which apply to this proposal. Allow further subdivisions of developed single family lots only if the neighborhood character and symmetry are preserved. ' Maintain existing single family lot and building minimums. However, establish a secondary single family zoning classification that allows for reduced minimum lot and building requirements based on neighborhood characteristics. Allow redevelopment of parcels in small lot areas of the City according to neighborhood standards. Staff believes that*the proposed subdivision is not in conflict with these policies. Staff recommends approval of the Subdivision and lot width variance conditioned on: * Final Plat Approval * Subdivision Dedication 6 , I c D Z 253 ;.94 ow —j ST 42ND (4 3 S' 420 - - - -- --------- - - - - -- (161) ---------------------- 4 21 422 -------------- 49) ------------------- 21 ------- — ---- 423( 4 423, (53) ------------------ t 5.) OL 42c-14 ----------------- (�) 4231 4 423 6 C) 424 0 (05 424 4 0424 ---------- (,42;i- MORNINGSIDE 42t742154213 420 4 10 227 - --------- 40) 25: Li E (34) L------------------ 420; 1". 1233 (72 40Q4 209 1, ------------------- T---, 4208 — ---------- ------ -------- -- (87) 420� 213 (37) 424;L) 4212 ----------------------------- ----------- (4) 4210 4 215 2 4 7,2) ---------------- ----- 20 ------------- I-, --- 4217 p 2n ------- ��n-2 ------ 9Y 1) --------------- 4214 4218 217 (36) (9z) 4216 rs 221 219 ----------- -1,221 1 mo 421& ---- ------------ - -• - -. -------- --------------7 -----j 0223 (32) 422 1 4222 ---------- (°-------- - - - - -- ---- (31) --------------------------- 1 -------- - 227 (114) 225 i4l (8) 422 227 (30) mo 422d (1 0) 422 229 (?9) --------------------------------- --------------- --------------- A 0% 4,ft W 4231 --------- —1 --------------- 4233 (,,) a (12) ? 4232 235 us) u---- - - - - -- 237 (26) 4234 239 (nZ3) ) 235 (1 ----------------m -) - -- — -- — -------- - - - - -$ 4 2 41 (a) 423 8 243 un (16) 4242 --------------- ---------------- --------------- 9 245 (2o ? (102) 247 - PA' a — 3 ON T ' 249 (19) 9 v (17) --------------m------ - 2 Mill 420 Q ( 126) 54 ,.. AIA - - RD- — ............ !9203 2 (aa) 4207 E 4219 223 4 10 227 - --------- - - Li E (34) L------------------ 420; 1". 1233 (72 40Q4 4235 ------------------- T---, 4- 209(, 23 ) 237 (87) 420� --------------------- 8 4241 424;L) 4213 --------------- --------------------------------- ----------- (4) 4210 4 215 2 4 7,2) ---------------- ----- 20 ------------- I-, --- 4217 p 2n --------------------------------- ? ------------ 9Y 1) --------------- 4214 4219 ( 1 ia) (9z) 4216 rs 221 mo 223 ---- ------------ - -• - -. -------- --------------7 -----j 422 1 225 (11r) ALM ---- 2w -------- - 227 (114) ----- - ----------- - - -- 4229 -------------------- mo 422d 4230 231 !! -- -------------- ---------------- 423 ('00 4 2 3 4 235 (1 ----------------m -) - -- ------------ 423 (101) 4238 9239 --------------- 9 ? (102) 4246 (101) 4242 iS243 ( 10) --------------m------ - ---------- :. -- (104) — ---------------- 424_1 - 424 20) ----------- ---------- 07) 8 - --- ------ 41tuLA '06) 42 4 - - RD- — ............ !9203 2 (aa) 4207 E 4219 p --------------- Cm) (38) (30) : (107) (106) 1 1 A .. : . : : :, . 1 (95) (97): 223 ----------- 4225 227 4229 Li E 4231 ----------------- 1233 (72 4235 43 --------------------- 237 4239 --------------------- 8 4241 424;L) --------------- IL.... - 24§5) 2 4 7,2) ---------------- ----- 20 p --------------- Cm) (38) (30) : (107) (106) 1 1 A .. : . : : :, . 1 (95) (97): M A T6Yo I kL,- 5445M iTTED bN 1��'c�ew► (oar i ABOUT MY PROPOSAL TO SUBDIVIDE My name is Dick Belfry. I am your neighbor and have lived at 4243 Grimes Avenue for 12 years. I love this neighborhood and want to remain here. I also want to live in a new house and the only way I can afford to do this is to subdivide my 100 foot -wide lot into two 50 foot lots. I intend to live in the new home and sell my existing home. The new home will be similar in design and building materials to existing homes in the neighborhood, i.e., bungalow style with traditional pitched roof, dormers and hips (similar to my current home). My plan is to preserve the existing hedge_ and_. large. trees which currently exist on the lot and build the house behind existing vegetation. As part of my plan, I also intend to restore the backyard rock-garden/landscape pool. My proposal is completely in character with the-rest of the neighborhood. You should know that: • The Edina Planning Department has recommended approval of my proposed subdivision based on the fact that most lots in the Morningside area are 50 feet wide and the proposed subdivision is consistent with the policies in Edina's comprehensive plan. • Most of the lots in the Morningside area have previously been subdivided into 50 foot lots. Of the 113 lots within 500 feet of my home, only 11 remain undivided 100 foot -wide lots. • The proposed subdivision will not change the character of the neighborhood. Most of the remaining 100 foot - wide lots, unlike my lot, are unsuitable for subdivision because of existing structures or steep slopes. • There will be no reduction in neighborhood property values. I feel it is only fair to allow me to divide my lot so that it is the same size as almost all of the "Lots in the neighborhood. As a long -time resident of the neighborhood and someone who wishes to remain here, I ask for your support. :��t `,gyp ',�.w: %�, ` :{ Y. N, �.. vr.�'«�! � art .�., ,. •J' ;t•�.• :�-r �1 1 '! � '.'. ..a Y^,'rf, •mow'. ' ^t •;~���� _ _ J; : «: 1. •IT.��I�'Zti� -•• ••��• ZVI ftn i•r - - qMjk': :1 :31 = :W/±19191 mile I t 4 rr , l s. ,e) 19) PETITION TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL TO ALLOW SUBDIVISION OF LOT Person Requesting Subdivision: Richard Belfry Street Address: 4243 Grimes Avenue South - Legal Description: Lot 67, Morningside, Hennepin County We, the undersigned, support the recommendation of the Edina Planning Department and request the Edina City Council to approve the above - referenced subdivision. Name Address Phone M r � Ma - wel M � 116 M_M" 4 - M M M WIC. . r i ,r i( ��youov f � r 2 2 PETITION TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL TO ALLOW SUBDIVISION OF LOT Person Requesting Subdivision: Richard Belfry Street Address: 4243 Grimes Avenue South _ -Legal Description: Lot 67, Morningside, Hennepin County We, the undersigned, support the recommendation of the Edina Planning Department and request the Edina City Council to approve the above - referenced subdivision. Name Address Phone 1 3Z LN i M&'41V �i C' - h V CiVT (o PETITION TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL TO ALLOW SUBDIVISION OF LOT Person Requesting Subdivision: Richard Belfry Street Address: 4243 Grimes Avenue South Legal Description: Lot 67, Morningside, Hennepin County We, the undersigned, support the recommendation of the Edina Planning Department and request the Edina City Council to approve the above - referenced subdivision. i Address Phone A /P5 y8� ,a FAM . -3 0 ri vh2s u 2 p 7a - cr GiL7 -7L93 Qa7 - 7a 93 2;la - 16 lip -s�s�� Edina Realty... Edina 0 .Tice -50th & chance 3930 West 49'/z Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 (612) 920 -1960 December 10, 1990 Mr. Richard Belfry 4243 Grimes Avenue South Edina, MN 55416 Re: Subdivision of 4243 Grimes Avenue South Dear Dick: I am very familiar with your property and the surrounding neighborhood having been a real estate broker active in the Morningside area for the past 12 years. In accordance with your request, I have reviewed your subdivision proposal and building plans to determine if the proposal will have any adverse impact on surrounding property values. It is my opinion that your present home is located so as to easily accomodate the subdivision of your lot into two 50 ft. lots, which is consistent with the vast majority of lots in the Morningside area. Your plans for a new home appear to be consistent with the style and character of the neighborhood and, in my opinion, will have no adverse impact on surrounding property values. Please let me.know if you have any questions. Ver truly yours, Georgi Kaiser GK:kh 19 Mu 12Y f December 13, 1990 Mayor and City council City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN. 55424 Re: Preliminary Plat Approval Belfry Addition Lot 56, Morningside 4243 Grimes Avenue South Gentlemen: We believe splitting up Belfry's lot is the wrong thing to do. We think it is a very desirable lot as is and was meant to be that way. If it were to change, it would be good for only one person, the owner, lookdvery the The present house and garage Putting a house and garage in back, and driveway to it on the proposed property, would look very bad. There would be a big loss of open space and a deterioration of neighborhood character. The subdivision should be denied. In 1984 such a subdivision was denied. There is a lot of carpenter work presently not completed on his present house and garage. i ohn and Nathalie Peterson 429 Grimes Avenue South Edina, MN. 55416 (3-P NG A Se,jL I Iq 9 `-� 401 WeS t 50t-V-) R-2, Cl ck-/ Q, Fa-Q, S - 9 o - 5 To a-Qk c cm,c�uyu-d : to S L o+ J% . ��- vc� .e; JZuLO boA inm Xo O�-� a,-C\- i- to 10-1- _L �, by S c T he, v a k to w fan. tvn dv b-�- +o P-LL-t re U tK'o-j yL° tru ly ;�, s �,� TO: The City of Edina Planning Department We, as property owners near the Belfry lot, strongly oppose its subdivision and sell -off to create a new lot. It is one of the few larger lots left in Morningside and, so, adds much needed grace and charm to the area. Morningside consists mostly-of narrow lots because this dividing and selling -off of property has been accepted for so many years. We desperately need to preserve these last parcels of our dwindling environment for two reasons: 1. To protect Morningside's one avenue that is classic "Americana" with its larger lots, arching trees and rolling lawns. 2. To retain some semblance of the natural environment - not recreate the inner -city with its narrow lots. Please do not allow this subdivision. It robs our neighborhood of stature and serves to remind us of the self- serving, overly - consumptive behavior that seems to plague so many. sincerely, Vk_f NI-Al Barbara & Christopher ayhoe. 4211 Morningside Roa� GL+.ria[[.vi �i22Zia.ee.� /} ONO z lww�l� I APPLICANT. PROPERTY ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIMON: PURPOSE: DATE OF HEARING: TIME OF HEARING: PLACE OF HEARING: HOW TO PARTICIPATE: Mr. Belfry 4243 Grimes Avenue Lot 56, Morningside Create one new buildable lot Monday, December 17, 1990 7:00 PM Council Chambers Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street 1. Submit a letter to the address below expressing your views, and/or 2. Attend the hearing and give testimony for or against the proposal. FURTHER INFORMATION: City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina MN 55424 (612) 927 -8861 DATE OF NOTICE: December 7, 1990 TIMOTHY S. MCCARTHY 12 September 1990 City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Subject: Case File S-90 -5 - Creation of New Buildable Lot Reference: Notice of Public Hearing dated 09 -07 -90 Ladies and Gentlemen: The purpose of this letter is to respond to the referenced notice and express our views regarding Case File S -90 -5, the creation of a new buildable lot at 4243 Grimes Avenue South (Lot 56, Morningside). Although we are. sensitive to the rights of property owners and their ability to do as they wish with their property, there should be reasonable limits placed upon those rights. This is a case in point. One of the reasons our family chose to live in the Morningside area was the fact that the area is relatively quiet and the housing is well spaced. There are exceptions, but there are a good number of double lots in this area compared to other residential neighborhoods in Minneapolis or even older section of Edina. We are concerned that this characteristic of our neighborhood should not be lost. In the last few years we have seen several double lots split up and developed, and while the housing built on these lots has been attractive in most cases, in others the effect is one of crowding. The property owner to the south of the lot in question already is experiencing some crowding from residences facing Morningside Road. We believe the development of Lot 56 creates a negative impact on this homeowner and contributes to the problem, of crowding we've mentioned. Therefore, we are opposed to the creation of a new buildable lot as proposed by the applicant, Mr. Belfry. Thank you for the opportunity to share our views. Sincerely, \ \J ("i Timot . McCarthy Kathleen A. McCarthy C \ 4246 SCOTT TERRACE EDINA, MN 55416 (612) 542 -5238 Mr. Craig Larson Community Development Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina. MN 55424 Dear Mr. Larson: 4234 Grimes Avenue South Edina, MN 55416 August 12. 1990 and Planning Commission I'm writing to oppose the subdivision proposed by Mr. Richard Belfrey of 4243 Grimes Avenue South. My wife and I have lived on Grimes Avenue for a little over two years. When we returned to Minnesota, we rented for five months and specifically followed listings on Grimes. One of the main reasons we wanted to live on Grimes was the large number of houses, including the one we purchased, which retain double lots. Along with the many houses of pre -war construction, these double lots provide our neighborhood with a sense of space and character. We were further encouraged by the City's previous decisions to deny subdivisions and to avoid widening Grimes for a bus route; we believed that Edina valued and would preserve this neighborhood. An approval of Mr. Belfrey's proposal would reverse this trend. While I respect Mr. Belfrey's desire to realize value on his property, his subdivision would detract from the value of all the surrounding housing because of the potential for increased housing density. This is particularly true of the proposed subdivision, since the lot is too narrow to support a house similar in size to its neighbors. We would ,certainly petition the City for a reduction in assessed valuation of our house if this subdivision were approved. We believe that reduced valuations on the surrounding homes would offset any increase in the property tax base from this subdivision. We hope that both the Planning Commission and the City Council will reject this proposal and preserve the character of our neighborhood. cc: Maya Frederick S. Richards SinPnJ. St we . Beryl M. Schewe /I Petition to the Edit$ City Planning Coniniission and Edina City Council to REJECT the following request for subdivision: Person requesting subdivision: Richard Belfrey, 4243 Grimes Ave. So. Legal description: Lot 67, Morningside, Hennepin Co. Commercial reference: Belfry Addition, Edina, MN RKA #9186 We, the undersigned, live within 500 feet of the proposed subdivision and are opposed to it because: 1. Our property values and the property value of 4243 Grimes Ave. would go down if the subdivision were approved. 2. in aomrdance with Edina Ordinance 804.14 (a)(1), the subdivision should be opposed in order to preserve the "character and symmetry of the neighborhood." The character of the neighborhood would be severely compromised by the additional density of the proposed subdivision nip M V ` j Petition to the Edina City Plaiuiing Conuiiission and Edina City CoLnncil to REJECT the following request for subdivision: Person requesting subdivision: Richard Belfrey, 4243 Grimes Ave. So. Legal description: Lot 67, Morningside, Hennepin Co. Commercial reference: Belfry Addition, Edina, MN RKA #9186 We, the undersigned, live within 500 feet of the proposed subdivision and are opposed to it because: 1. Our property values and the property value of 4243 Grimes Ave. would go down if the subdivision were approved. 2. In accordance with Edina Ordinance 804.14 (a)(1), the subdivision should be opposed in order to preserve the "character and symmetry of the neighborhood." The character of the neighborhood would be severely compromised by the additional density of the proposed subdivision. NAME ADDRESS PHONE Petition to the Edinna City Planning Conunissiotn and Edina City Council to REJECT the following request for subdivision: Person requesting subdivision: Richard Belfrey, 4243 Grimes Ave. So. Legal description: Lot 67, Morningside, Hennepin Co. Commercial reference: Belfry Addition, Edina, MN RKA #6186 We, the undersigned, live within 500 feet of the proposed subdivision and are opposed to it because: 1. Our property values and the property value of 4243 Grimes Ave. would go down if the subdivision were approved. 2. In accordance with Edina Ordinance 604.14 (a)(1), the subdivision should be opposed in order to preserve the 'character and symmetry of the neighborhood." The character of the neighborhood would be severely compromised by the additional density of the proposed subdivision .; K ?o8 95, 5. ro. r5. qod Petition to the Edina City Platuii � Conunission and Edina City Couticil to REJECT the followitkg request for subdivision:. Person requesting subdivisionRichard Belfrey, 4243 Grimes Ave. So. Legal description Lot 67, Morningside, Hennepin Co. Commercial reference: Belfry Addition, Edina, MN RKA #9186 We, the undersigned, live within. 500 feet of the proposed subdivision and are opposed to it because: 1. Our property values and the property value of 4243 Grimes Ave. would go down if the subdivision were approved. 2. in accordance with Edina Ordinance 804.14 (a)(1), the subdivision should be opposed in order to preserve the "character and symmetry of the neighborhood." The character of the neighborhood would be severely compromised by the additional density of the proposed subdivision. NAME ADDRESS . PHONE August 12, 1990 Planning Commission City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Sir and Ms. : Randy Stern Ron Krueger & Associates 8080 Wallace Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 This letter is in regard to the Blefry Addition, Edina, MN, RKA # 9186 (proposed subdivision at 4243 Grimes Avenue South, Edina, MN., Lot 67, Morningside, Hennepin Co.). I,wish to be put on the record as strongly oppossed to the above proposed subdivision. My reasons are as follows. 1. Edina - Morningside is not a new subdivision and is an established neighborhood. The essential character of the neighborhood has been established now for a number of years. This character includes large lots for some of the dwellings which adds variety and green. The very reason areas such as Morningside are attractive is this variety. By subdividing, the area begins to resemble the house after house look so typical of Minneapolis. 2. Edina has a large and broad -based tax base such that a subdivision is not necessary for increased income. Indeed, over the long run I would think that the property at 4243 Grimes would be negatively affected by being on a smaller lot. 3. I believe the owners at,- - �n- '`I�Grimes would by the subdivision. They would be forced much construction. Certainly, this could addition were constructed at the property in the present context an entire dwelling be negatively impacted to put up with happen if a room next door, but would be involved. In the past few years the pattern in Morningside has been for an aging neighborhood to shift to a family with children in school neighborhood. Close inspection indicates most owners, including those with large lots, are adding on rooms and improving their property. Subdivision has not been the norm as it was perhaps back in the 1930s. In summary, I urge the Planning Commission to reject the proposed subdivision. Sincerely, ohn E. Kalachnik 4114 Morningside Road Edina, MN 55416 4234 Grimes Avenue South Edina, MN 55416 August 14, 1990 Mr. Craig Larson Community Development and Planning Commission Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Larson: I'm writing to oppose the subdivision proposed by Mr. Richard Belfrey of 4243 Grimes Avenue South. My wife and I have lived on Grimes Avenue for a little over two years. When we returned to Minnesota, we rented for five months and specifically followed listings on Grimes. One of the main reasons we wanted to live on Grimes was the large number of houses, including the one we purchased, which retain double lots. Along with the many houses of pre -war construction, these double lots provide our neighborhood with a sense of space and character. We were further encouraged by the City's previous decisions to deny subdivisions (e.g., 4231 Grimes) and to avoid widening Grimes for a bus route; we believed that Edina valued and would preserve this neighborhood. An approval of Mr. Belfrey's proposal would reverse this trend. While I respect Mr. Belfrey's desire to realize value on his property, his subdivision would detract from the value of all the surrounding housing because of the potential for increased housing density. This is particularly true of the proposed subdivision, since the lot is too narrow to support a house similar in size to its neighbors. We would certainly petition the City for a reduction in assessed valuation of our house if this subdivision were approved. We believe that reduced valuations on the surrounding homes would offset any increase in the property tax base from this subdivision. We hope that both the Planning Commission and the City Council will reject this proposal and preserve the character of our neighborhood. Sincerely, Stephen J. Sche e cc: Mayor Frederick S. Richards August 13, 1990 Mayor, Members of City Council, and Planning Commission City of 3dina 4801 W 50th Street tdina , iZT K 5424 Tear Mayor, Council Members, and Commission Members; I am writing to advise you of my feelings.regardin3 the proposed Belfry subdivision in Vorningside. My husband and I own the house to the south of the proposed subdivision; the home most affected by the change. �.Je are strongly against the proposed subdivision for several reasons* 1. Mr. Belfry's house was built on the south side of the part of the Lot he would retain_, and our house on the north part of our lot; leaving an extremely narrow area in which,to build. The existing houses were not dPSi?ned with this density of housing in mind - windows and rooms are not placed in such a way as to ?ive privacy with another home close by. They were built 7.aith the empty spice and trees for privacy. 2. 1.4e bought this house Inst fall anri roved in on Oct. 28, 1989. We bought the house solely because :e love the character of the neighborhood as it is now. when we moved in the ordinance regarding new construction required a 75' lot and we ,)ere assured the empty space next door was not a. buildable lot. Now the ordinance has been changed; changed at a time when we were too busy with movin3 and.settling in to be aware of the change and its possible effect on us. ;ale would definitely not have bought this house if we had ever touszht such a sub- division was nossible'. Having, Loved so recently it is not .possible for us to make enough from the sale of this home to nay .realtors fees and closing costs a.xain and ,afford to move any time in the near Future. 3. In takin• a netition ground the neighborhood we have found that 65' of the 70 neizhbors (92 %) we have been able to find at home so fa.r also oppose 'his type of new development. This subdivision would set a precedent for new development with the potential for increasing drastically the density of the neighborhood and in the process chan,ing the character completely. The people living here do not taint this tyre. of crowding and character change. even those who live on 100' lots do not Uian.t to see this sub ivision approved. You can build new houses many places, but you cannot build another 75 -year -old neighborhood-with large open areas, mature trees, and the stable character,of P•ornin3side. Please take the time to drive down srires Ave. and the other neighbortn; streets. I think you -fill agree we have a unique situation here that is well worth preserving. Perhaps the new ordinance could be changed or limited with respect to the Morninzside neighborhood, Please reje,t this proposal for subdivision. Ann ristens en 4247 Grimes Ave. S. VA in? eehi e August 20, 1990 To the Mayor of Edina, all Council Members, and the Members of the Edina Planning Commission, ' RE: Proposed Belfry subdivision of the property known as Lot 679 Morningside, Hennepin County (4243 Grimes Ave. S.) This is a statement of OPPOSITION. On this particular site, squeezing a large new house between the present older structures would be aesthetically and environmentally unacceptable.' (Large new house' because only such a home would be economically compatible with such costly property. Developers these days seem determined to fill every inch of available space.) Mr. Belfry's driveway and house are situated toward the center of his property, nearly reaching the proposed 50' limit; because of this, beyond the Belfry bungalow it is likely that the continuance southward would consist of two large houses only 10' apart. It is hard to believe that a division was ever intended for this lot. Stripped of the open areas still on Grimes Avenue, the old homes are not as valuable intrinsically as housesin other parts of Edina. Our perception is that the total value of our property, directly across the street, would be diminished -if our present view were changed to that of double garage doors and an expanse of concrete driveway. Our'neighbors have'moved here, as did we, because of the charming older homes, wide lawns, and a quiet street reminiscent of a small town in other times. It would only contribute to the loss of this very ambience which attracts people here in the first place, if this partition were to be allowed. 4242 Grimes Ave. S. Edina, MN 55416 cc Richard-Belfry Sincerely, Mrs. J. Frederic Nissen (Lois C.) v lac) �y;l MY Mayor Fred ffid nls; the Edina City Couocil; Mr. Craig Laroan, the Edina City Plarnrer, and the Edina City Manning Commission re: request for a subdivision at 4243 G ritwes Ave. So. by Mr. Belfry 1hankyou for this opportunity to state ow opposition to the proposed scibdiviAm Our reasons for asking you to reject the sabdivisian are nummm and well- r1m. W I 1) Ninety-seven (97) neighbcM all livingmthin 500 feet of 4243 (;rimes, have signed_ the petition on file signifying their opposition to the subdivision. The In 1984, late. Florence Howe requested a subdivision of her property at 4231 Grimes that is identical to Mr. BeMys current request. N-411 1tfiood opposition was dearly staged and heeded by the CmmciL In 1978,1& and Mrs. aobn Marine requadmd Mocni widen Rd The to build on petitimed and &WIned the Mirmad of their neighbors for the variance and it was granted by the Coumcil. Aside from mail 'nog us the letter statmgIns intent to subdivide, Mr. Belfry has done nothingf rther to inform or seek the opinion of his neighbors. 2) The clanacto and emmetzy of the ne'gtrborltood would be co®pt+o®ised by the proposed subdivisioo...ThaU& subdivisions have been approved in the past, the safety of the ne401 1 d waudd be jeWw&W by any farther subdivisions. — Within 300 feet of 4243 (rimes, there am6botises on lots of 100' X200.' All of those houses am an c ihm and. all are opposed to the subdivision. — (Mmes Ave. is a bony street with parking an only the east side of the street: Adding this subdivision woudd mean that four driveways would emverge within 65 feet of each other. Became two of the four houmbolds have elementary age children, aoddmm is a nmmr School an the corner of Mornings` and Csimes, and Edina C='s Smnday service is well - attended, there wotdd be a very high level of bWk to the area. Adding this subdivi dm woRdd significantly increase the risk of serious accident to the marry children, drurcl�goers, pedestrians, drivers, and residents in the area. 3) The plans for the home to be hilt an the proposed sddivisian call for keeping the two mature trees, existing hexes, and the screen hawse. Ordinance 804 does not oblige Mr. Belfry to bold the hoarse as planned. There is no guarantee that the developerwin mt destroy same of the above features in order to fit the newho®e an the lot to any case, 4243 (;rimes Ave. would be worth mares with the lot intact than dividing it into two lots. Again thank you for this opportunity to express aar opinion. We hope yon will find there is able reasan to reject Mr. Bel6ys request for a s&divisian. SIRIC Greg Silvis and Helen Burke 4246 crimes Ave. So. FA= MN 55416 92,9 -9690 ac W. Ridurd Beffry B'21'9U Mr. Craig Larson Community Development Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Larson: Grimes Avenue South i, MN 55416 st 14, 1990 and Planning Commission I'm writing to oppose the subdivision proposed by Mr. Richard Belfrey of 4243 Grimes Avenue South. My wife and I have lived on Grimes Avenue for a little over two years. When we returned to Minnesota, we rented for five months and specifically followed listings on Grimes. One of the ,main reasons we wanted to live on Grimes was the large number of houses, including the one we purchased, which retain double lots. Along with the many houses of pre -war construction, these double lots provide our neighborhood with a sense of space and character. We were further encouraged by the City's previous decisions to deny subdivisions (e.g., 4231 Grimes) and to avoid widening Grimes for a bus route; we believed that Edina valued and would preserve this neighborhood. An approval of .Mr. Belfrey's proposal would reverse this trend. While I respect Mr. Belfrey's desire to realize value on his property, his subdivision would detract from the value of all the surrounding housing because of the potential for increased housing density. This is particularly true of the proposed subdivision, since the lot is too narrow to support a house similar in size to its neighbors. - We would certainly petition the City for a reduction in assessed valuation 'of our house if this subdivision were approved. We believe that reduced valuations on the surrounding homes would offset any increase in the property tax base from this subdivision. We hope that both the Planning Commission and the City Council will reject this proposal and preserve the character of our neighborhood. (F`1 ayor Frederick S. Richards J Sincerely, Stephen J. Schewe December 10, 1990 City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Sirs: r This letter is in response to Richard Belfry's request to subdivide his lot at 4243 Grimes Ave So. We are opposed to this request for a variance and have been opposed to all such requests in the past. We were actively involved in opposing Florence Howe's request in 1984. Her request was. denied by the City Council at that time. We believe it set a precedent that should be upheld-in this case too. It is our belief that Belfry's request would change the character of the neighborhood and have a negative impact on its appearance and function. This'end of the block is unique to Grimes Avenue and the Morningside community. It provides a link to the past when many of the lots were undivided. At present there are four 100 foot lots which adjoin each other on the east side of the street and there are three comparable lots directly across from us on the west side,of the street. We request that you view this block in person and then compare it to other blocks in the Morningside,area. We hope that this will make.you realize the value of the current configuration of houses and lots on our block. We know you will give this matter the serious consideration it deserves. Sincerely, Dr. Richard Schultz Pene 1 op I J es 4235 Grimes Ave. So. 927 -6207 December 6, 1990 Tot Mayor Richards, the Edina City Council, Mr. Craig Larsen City Planner; Ret Request for subdivision at 4243 crimes Ave. S. by Mr. Belfry i A number of people have made their opinions and arguments known regarding this controversial proposal. I would like to add only these points: The Planning Commission. was unanimous in its vote to deny this sub - division. Please consider that these Commissioners were appointed to consider the merits of the case carefully and did hear all arguments patiently. Mr. Belfry was allowed to speak twice so he could make. a rebuttal to his neighbors objections. Still the Planning Commission voted to deny the sub - division. Some of their reasons for denial are in the minutes as published. Also, in reading ordinances 804 and 825 =430 I find no provision for dividing a lot at, this date to any size smaller than 75' width. The fact that smaller lots were allowed in the past is no reason to allow this practice to continue at this date any more than we would allow new houses to be built that do not -meet modern building codes. In fact, we have very strong precedents to preserve the neighborhood as it is and deny any new sub - division. (See the Florence Howe case of,1984.) After a, careful reading of the letters and documents on file and the Planning Commission decision regarding this proposal, I must again ask you to deny this request for sub - division. Sincerely, Annette Christensen 4247 Grimes Ave. S. Edina, MINT 55416 Telephone 927 -5223 _ �r9' r November 20,1990 To: Mayor Fred Richards, the Edina City Council; Mr. Craig Larson, the Edina Qty Planner, and the Edina City Planning Commission re request for a subdivision at 4243 Grimes Ave: So. by Mr. Belfry We understand that Mr. Belfry has a period of 120 days from the date that the. Planning Commission unanimously decided to reject his proposal for a subdivision on 8/29/90, to appeal the Commission's decision. As the minutes of the 8/29/90 meeting state,. "He [Mr. Belfry] asked the neighbors present to accept his apology for not informing them in person regarding this request" Mr. Belfry let the Planning Department know that he intended to use the -120 days to share information with his neighbors regarding his request for a subdivision, so as to enhance the hUlihood of having his request ultimately approved. In his 1 statement before the Commission, Mr., Belfry stated that he would seek to preserve the character of the neighborhood All of his neighbors stated objections to his proposed subdivision Their objections were varied and detailed and presented only in outline in a long public meeting. We had hoped that Mr Belfry would use the 120 days to meet with his neighbors to understand their objections. He has not damage the integrity of the neieh � We hope you will use this information to make an informed decision should the question of a further extension arise. In addition, please tote that the minutes of the 9/29190 Planning Commission meeting tied to mention bibs cotttg t3& A& Bob Cbristensen opened his renuft with the presentation of a petition with cure htn dmd and one ( 101) sqpmdures from people opposed to the subdivisionq all of them living wdk n the S00 feet neighborhood defused 'by the Mwning Depatimslent This reps over %% of the iuMOdxNs Contacted- Thank Thank you for this opportunity to update you and further state our desire to have this proposal denied Sincere Bob Christensen Annette Christensen 4247 Grimes Ave. South 929 -5223 6-1 le- 5 *� Greg Silvis Helen Burke 4246 Grnnes Ave. South M9690 tl�"fqv XCH"0490H AMOCO L 0 Y IVM%WAf4 Zi3i �AW i tf,", i W),si, �-Zfx w t 0 UMMMM"W40 to 4 + OVII MQ AAM MAE w k 0 w1m,"MWAVANXI, so 10i ,k24 f ", r*4 %*'f 44 149 WOVO4WIC so cm — DMI N At 0 MWI MWAlw49wlwK9l 50 k �Whcl fo h M L 0 us"WMx so &MwM%f 9 L u WPM~" Www 68 M6 A's mot 6 v 4",uvwums K 10 WS00 W, wrvm b q co AL0,14 lWisle, 1II T *C, so 4 � 4 4 hALA, 4 MW` q, 4 wwww"x to 4,,6�9 fllkk .w fw"howmwww 60 ON A 0" Kuwk q �i, A, om, Vxnl "C'04"'I un MOV wwwo s 0) A wAKWAll"i to VIA fgIvIll", WWAIIII�f I � � IV A"'1141, Tif'W"N"I ft I ',,I wwm"4 No um" %Awi I Q j w pumm 11 NZ Awwus Nmf 'Z 'IV 4 =4 5 w" r4 so I Qv s w * wx k i 81 L sc 103 W K, QwSk"s lot Q xi To ON wws i I',, Al CALAINACAkA wt, VWWW4 ; 0, etux: IV AVAC* j w f"', Q0,0041 z n, b, 54CAMANWA I'll *461w$ 1 1 " WKW ~901N t x 6 MAW Avilvow 41ft W ovwms woovAs uw G"W� O&MM5 § 0 4232 JP vi vi i, IV, % t4 offtks W1 WA*!Pfe4,5 TO" G0 " "A N 1P. 45wws N!4 L 4-, Wo"Wmal 4"s -4, st QW0MA,RA w i Woftftwiv. to WA ~MNAWN't 54, av so k k" Q WMMMA v i KOUN%vowx I "'10& A WWWWA .10AW"WKW MY LK WK NU 00 is 4 IN AWMIOMW w0AQ*WWMX I W060 wMMMM 01 PTwWWMwM* x sp ze MWMlv""W U, ,I WAW*ATqrk, pt tx $",I WIMAWWWWO, s n, =i4, WNINN'tat-4, so 14 I-, k*'PW#i,3s"Ot, "'T l04`, WWwq*lWl0�W-lv4 4"'t Ilt) o0rX ","'10 FY i on, WANOVwx PT01 Qwwmwowk M ix t, I k -*11A 5914W OrCs � , 'l'aAdW'**,`VlIAP At Q uwwIWW-lCl'l6ll to oo,,i Wwww"o, a R0,', IW4 04WA41 -,A, A*1164 WWOU" 60 WwwwwM A M&w *wW.A&N*-W *4 4%*W*MW Am to U^WWWWWW" 60 14 WNW*= L M N X M WWWWOMW 10 1 C. 49*WVA"'al t 1A welft WAWW3" $6 0WOUNKOST L k RUNS *AMrMWWWuA $6 IPWO w 40w 61 W to 4 W 601MMON400" so 4owwwo C M L W W"MWOMWE so 3� M"Wwwv c w MW w"~wWv*w �a 24 404 * 40" ST W to imb W-M-N&AWW" 5 �. ft, vMwMMv E I v t w to 2* vowwum w OR 0 WWWWWAV so to WrALS c4q wAl, AVM&W FOR IU WIS, &i is W.W nm "'s Whirs so 9f tOTIPMEN TO PWRW'f*A RATTO LOT wvvif ZCA W"n psopom WT 1 44,000. 101A No 211 ONWOM 3 ,012 6QAwttI to% 6C 2f, sly, M a-4v A 0 J l G Ae�' � '31 Lem December `14,1990 City of Edina Planning Department . 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Subjects CASE FILE S -90-5 Dear Planners: Your notice of the subject hearing and the offer to participate by letter is appreciated. It seems obvious that the applicant must be denied the.revision of property definition requested because: Only a few,years ago a closer neighbor was denied the opportunity to sell another similarly constituted property to an individual with plans to revise the lot definition similar to that of the S -90-5 case. In that instance the owner of the Howe property, located somewhat between the S -90 -5 case property and this recipient of your Dec 7, 1990 notice, was caused serious delay in her planned relocation. I am not aware of any changes in this part of the community which would justify accepting an'action now, which was not tolerated earlier. Again, thanks for the opportunity to participate. Truly concerned, Pearl B. Morgan 4226.Alden Drive Edina, MN 55416 926 6818 �k 0 ID REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KENNETH ROSLAND From: CRAIG LARSEN Date: DECEMBER 17, 1990 Subject: CONSERVATION RESTRICTION WHITE OAKS . Recommendation: Agenda Item # IV. B. Consent 0 Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Authorize execution of conservation restriction Manager. Info /Background by Mayor and As you will recall the City acquired the subject property in October of 1989 with the financial participation of the White Oaks Improvement Association. On October 16, 1989, the Council directed staff to prepare a restriction which would assure that the property would be maintained and protected as a natural area and storm water ponding area. Connor Schmid has reviewed the Restriction for the Association. 10/16/89 7 Member Paulus. commented that there w emar Men's has heard are that many avor of the one league po cy an ink that is a fair way to approach itre are also those that are contrary.. Mayor Richards observed that there is�an argument t an be made that those who supported the golf course facility are those who s d be given consideration. He said.he recognized that the City of Edina hasa stand behind the payment of the bonds on -the golf course. However, since . ­ eonstruction of the facility there has not been any moneys taken out of t qty's coffers to support that facility. Those who have truly supported nancially have been the users and that he would be concerned that the Coun .adopt a view that in effect would work as a dissidence to those individuals w eve supported that facility all those years. Mayor Richards said there may come a day when we would want non - residents to use-the facility j Vas residents use other golfing facilities in the larger community. He said , t, if it is the consensus of the Council, we look at what would happen if :preserve the status quo for one more year or in effect rescind the action tha taken in 1987 and then revisit the issue after the nine hole course is opens_ Member Rice said he conc ed T with Mayor Richards' position -with the understanding 0.1 that the National Car Re and Hennepin County leagues will not be playing at Braemar in 1990Zha-awhein Member Smith hat we leave the status quo by rescinding the 1987 action and see what the new nine hole course is opened in 1991 and revisit the issue at After len iscussion by the Council Members, Mayor Richards suggested that this mat a continued to November 20 so that everyone could be heard and with the un anding that staff would bring back a specific proposal in response to the d sion by the Council for action at that time. was made by Member Rice to continue the matter concerning golf league a to the meeting of November 20. Motion was seconded byemher Kelly. S1. REPORT GIVEN ON PURCHASE OF WHITE OAKS LOTS Assistant Manager Gordon Hughes reported that the City closed on the purchase of Lot 9, White Oaks Second'Addition and Lot 1, White Oaks Third Addition on October -10, 1989. The closing occurred after the City received half of the required purchase price from residents in the White Oaks area. Mayor Richards said that he had talked during the recess with several members, of the White Oaks Improvement Association who would like the Council to adopt a statement of intent or declaration, as requested in their letter of September 19, 1989, that would recognize the permanancy of the natural condition of the White Oaks lots. They said if there was-any problem with that they would like to come back at the next meeting to discuss their request. They also wanted the Council to understand their appreciation for action in acquiring the lots. Member Smith made a motion to direct staff to draft a resolution that would be recordable restricting the property to its present condition. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. Aug SUQD A uj COGrTt7 CLUB IISTRICT. 4601 �OQ ( 62)I"('63) ('.5e)''= (:55:- ( 561 a I ( 671 ! 0 460 , of iattaj :� {fI CK Ilrs } 081 ss, - -- - ' J 1 v / co R 4605 SUNNYSIDE � OA Z.; 169) a, VIM VIM w'a r n I 607 i , r- I ro.. Q U : 9j �I 0?-'5) >o b _ �n 7n i 509, x - T3. x 0 :.� ��>f �• ;: 4609 461' 501, y=e 3 t^I h _, I A 509'e) (91) • :, 3 RD ,.x - ' 1 A 50 = .. 4700: i3 46245 4619 A; 511 ( 55) Sa ( i9) n3 9 _ a 513, - 701-3 24 a. 35 (201 4702 — -- — - — �, 515, (i9) 470 703'5) 4700; 519, (3B) I i231 Fi z 521 470 90) (10 9 (2:) 9g7i gas JW r= Q • e :e o � ) ) PA I ((( %(�) 470 5 23 (5z) „ 70730) 2� es r �3=.., 22 (A , 7y 0 25 527 ,7 is (27) 4 77 0 (57) 7) (46) (4= 7) (49) 0, 79f) 4 ............ o. s W,46) At (; 2 m 52 29) J3 s„ X45(31 .3 q s) A ( 8 (29) A 08' Q6 04 01, (3e) n. es 713 j: LA — / �, BRIDGE tA_ es (39) (; (172) ® AMA lJ o D .a 717 471 0 �9 3• i ���►►IA (�_ ) 603,0 a ` (51l = O _ (3 n ) (e2) ac) N ' 3 605 N ! 7= R ,5 (�7a, (�� l!�� g ,, ,4719 4( �. (ry60 - ' -- — V�— -- 75. -- I •M.«. DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS THIS DECLARATION, made as of the day of _ , 1990, by the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "Declarant "); WITNESSETH; WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of certain property (the "Subject Property ") located in the City of Edina, Minnesota, described as follows: . Lot 0, White Oaks 2nd Addition, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of _the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota; and Lot 1, White Oaks 3rd Addition, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is a wooded, undeveloped area and presently serves, and historically has served, as a ponding area for collection of surface waters; and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is in an area of the City of Edina known as White Oaks, and the residents of that area contributed funds to Declarant to promote and. assist the purchase of the Subject Property by Declarant; and WHEREAS, it is desirable, in the public interest, and in the best interests of the City, that the Subject Property should remain in its present natural condition and as a ponding -area for collection of surface waters. NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration to Declarant paid, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by Declarant, the Declarant does hereby impose on the Subject Property the following covenants and conditions: 1. The Subject Property shall be and remain in its present, natural condition, and shall be used only as and for a ponding area for collection of surface waters; provided, however, that this use restriction shall not prevent Declarant from (i) constructing or installing on the Subject Property pipes, catch basins, swales, ditches, lift stations, or other improvements deemed desirable by Declarant for control or management of surface waters, or (ii) removing dead or dying trees, shrubs or other vegetation as deemed desirable by Declarant for proper control or management of surface waters or as deemed by Declarant to be consistent with good urban forest management practices, or (iii) planting, replacing or repairing trees, shrubs or other vegetation," on all or any part of the Subject Property, or allowing others to do so. 2. The foregoing covenant shall be for the benefit of the record fee owners from time to time of the lots described in. Exhibit A attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof (the " Benefitted Lots "), and may be enforced by any one or more of the then record fee owners of the Benefitted Lots. Declarant agrees that enforcement may be by specific performance or mandatory injunction, damages not being adequate relief. If any action, is brought to enforce the foregoing covenant, the non - prevailing party shall pay all court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees paid or incurred by the prevailing party, and all costs of collection of such costs and fees, again including reasonable attorneys' fees. 3. The covenant at paragraph 1 hereof may be amended, modified or terminated at any time and from time to time by an agreement, in writing, signed by Declarant and the then record fee owners of a majority of the Benefitted Lots and recorded or filed in the same office in which this document is recorded or filed. 4. The terms, covenants and conditions hereof shall run with the land and shall be binding on all present and future owners of the Subject Property, and shall inure to the benefit of Declarant, its successors and assigns, and the record fee owners from time to time, of the Benefitted Lots. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, Declarant has caused this document to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF EDINA By Its Mayor And Its Manager This instrument is exempt from State Deed Tax. THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY: -2- DORSEY & W1-HTNEY 2200 First Bank Place East c Minneapolis, MN 55402 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1990, by Frederick S. Richards, the Mayor, and Kenneth E. Rosland the Manager of the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. -3- MIT --I Lots 8, 9, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19 and 20, Auditor's Subdivision Number 319, Hennepin County, Minnesota; 0 Lots 2, 7 and 8, White Oaks 3rd Addition; Lots 12, 13, 14 and 15, White Oaks 4th Addition, Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, White Oaks 5th Addition; All according to the recorded and filed plat and auditor's subdivision thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 350 PARE AVENUE NEW YORK. NEW YORK 10022 (212) 415 -9200 1330 CONNECTICUT AVENUE. N. W. WASHINGTON, D. C. 20036 (202) 857 -0700 3 ORACECRURCH STREET LONDON EC3V OAT. ENGLAND 44- 71- 929-3334 . 36, RUE THONGS ET 75009 PARIS. FRANCS 33-1 -42- 66-59 -49 45, RUE DE TREVES 8-1040 BRUSSELS, BELGIUM 32- 2-238-78-0 Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland City Manager City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Ken: DORSEY & WHITNEY A P. INSHO INCLDDINO P- 358I0NA1, Coa�OUnows' 2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402-1498 (612) 340-2600 TELEX 29 -0605 FAX (612) 340 -2868 THOMAS S. MUCEMN (6= 340-2M November 26, 1990 201 FIRST AVENUE, S. W., SUITE 340 ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 55902 f507) 288-3156 1200 FIRST INTERSTATE CENTER BILLINGS, MONTANA 59103 (406) 252-3800 201 DAVIDSON BUILDING OREAT FALLS, MONTANA 59401 (406) 727 -3032 127 EAST FRONT STREET MISSOULA, MONTANA 59802 (406) 721-6025 Re: Lot 9, White Oaks 2nd Addition and Lot 1, White Oaks 3rd Addition You will recall that when the City bought the above two lots, the price was funded in large part (I believe it'was up to 50 %) by residents of White Oaks. In turn, they asked the Council, by letter dated September 19, 1989, to recognize the permanency of the natural condition and ponding area of the property by some appropriate dedication. Subsequent to that time, Mr. Connor Schmid drafted a document to impose restrictions upon the property. I reviewed that document and advised him that I would like to rewrite it. I have not gotten around to doing that until now. There is, therefore, enclosed a Declaration of Restrictions upon Lots 9 and 1 imposing the restriction that they be retained in their natural state and used for drainage and ponding purposes. I am sending this Declaration to you for your review and comment. If it meets with your approval, and that of Connor Schmid, to whom I am also sending a copy, we can put it on the Council agenda for its action. I am also sending a copy of this letter, together with a copy of the Declaration to Mayor Richards. It is my understanding he will soon be attending a meeting of the White Oaks Association and I am sure he is going to be asked about DORSEY & WHITNEY Mr. Kenneth E. Rosiand November 26, 1990 Page 2 the status of this Declaration. He should, therefore, be aware of the reason for delay and the status of the matter. If you have any questions on the enclosed document or this letter, please let me know. I will keep you advised of any changes requested by Connor Schmid. TSE:kks Enclosure cc Mr. Frederick S. Richards Mr. Fran Hoffman Mr. Craig Larsen; Very truly yours, ThPmasXrEr—ickson 9114 A. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00 DATE December 18, 1990 Ar2FNnA ITF11A VI. A. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Computer'Aided Design Workstation for Engineering Company Amount of Quote or &d 1• Office Products 1• $ 7,085.00 2. Accudata 2. $ 8,025.00. 3-' Computer Plus 3. $ 7,580.00 4 4. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR EID: Office Products $ 7,085.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is a part of the upgrade in the Engineering Department for use of computer aided design. This would'be funded thru equipment purchase portion of the engineering budget in public Works. i 1 Public Works - Engineering S' at Department The Recommended bid is within budget not within b et hn Wallin, nance Director Kenneth Rosland City Mana r r REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mavor Richards and City Council From: Bob Ko j etin Date: December 13, 1990 Subject: Edina Municipal Pool Recommendation: Agenda Item # UTT A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Paul O'Connor MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO ADOPT PLAN II FOR THE PROPOSED RENOVATION AND EDINA AQUATIC ENTERTAINMENT CENTER. Pat Vagnoni SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED. Info /Background: The proposed report that is enclosed gives the total proposed renovations of the Edina Municipal pool, cost of the project, fee increases to pay for the project, and the recommendation by the Park Board from the Park Board Minutes of December 11, 1990 The yellow sheets that are in the report are fairly self - explanatory to give you the total cost and fees of the proposal in the recommendation. EDINA PARK BOARD 7:30 p.m. December 11, 1990 MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM MEMBERS PRESENT: Bill Jenkins,.Andrew Montgomery, Jim Fee, Pat Vagnoni, Chip Sour, Bill Lord, Paul O'Connor, Jean Rydell MEMBERS ABSENT: Bob Christianson, Beth Hall, Mac Thayer STAFF PRESENT: Bob Kojetin, John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Janet Canton OTHERS PRESENT: James Otto, Henrik Oskam I. APPROVAL OF THE NOVEMBER 13, 1990 MINUTES Paul O'Connor MOVED TO APPROVE THE NOVEMBER 13, 1990 MINUTES. Bill•Lord SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION APPROVED. II. INDIANHEAD LAKE PROPERTY Mr. Kojetin informed the Park Board that Mr. Otto had contacted him with the idea of purchasing or having a non - exclusive easement to maintain a piece of city owned property.that abuts Mr. Otto and Mr. Oskam's property. Mr. Kojetin advised Mr. Otto to bring this request to the Park Board. Mr. Jenkins asked Mr. Otto and Mr. Oskam if they would like'to speak on this subject. Mr. Otto gave a brief request on what they would like to see done with the property. It was noted that ten years ago the city received this piece of property through tax forfeited land. Mr. Otto and Mr. Oskam have maintained this piece of property over the years by seeding, landscaping, planting trees and shrubbery, etc. The two gentlemen indicated they would "like to do.one of three things: 1. Purchase all of. the property. 2. Purchase a part of the property adjacent to Mr. Otto's and Mr. Oskam's property which is above lake level. 3. Have a non - exclusive easement to maintain the piece of city owned property. Mr. Otto indicated that this would take away some of the liability and expense of the city. Mr. Otto also indicated that there were two dead trees on the land and he contacted the Edina City, Forester to look at them. The City Forester had one tree cut down and left the logs. The other tree was leaning, but the Forester indicated that it is not the City's policy to cut down all dead trees on open space property. Mr. Otto would like'to have, the tree taken down since.the tree could easily come down in a bad storm and fall onto his house. He would also appreciate it if the logs from the other tree could be hauled away. Mr. Kojetin indicated that the logs are left there because it's considered an open space and wild life area. Mr. Otto would like written permission to be able to haul the logs away himself. Mr. Otto indicated that he does not want an oral agreement because it may not be enforceable. Mr. Otto and Mr. Oskam want to either buy the land or obtain a non - exclusive easement. Mr. Jenkins asked if there have been other situations like this? Mr. Kojetin indicated that most people with a similar situation, where there is a piece of property between a home owners property and a lake or creek, have maintained the property with the understanding that if the city ever wanted to do anything with the property they had the right to do it. Mr. Otto replied that they want written permission. Mr. Kojetin brought up the point that since it was tax forfeited land it cannot be sold or traded. If the city had purchased the land than it could be sold. Mr. Kojetin indicated that he did not know what the legal aspect of a nori- exclusive easement for this property is, but indicated he could find out more information on this property if so desired. Andrew Montgomery MOVED THAT A RECOMMENDATION BE MADE TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO INVESTIGATE A NON- EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT TO MAINTAIN THE PROPERTY ON INDIANHEAD LAKE. Jim Fee SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED. III. SENIOR CITIZEN STATUS Mr. Kojetin pointed out to the Park Board that in the 1991 budget $50,000 has been set aside for some type of renovation at the Community Center for a permanent Senior Center site. Mr. Kojetin indicated that Clark Engler, architect for the school district, has schematic sketches of how to remodel the Community Center for the Senior Center. Mr. Engler has broken the project into three different phases. One of the main objectives in the study is to make the Senior Center not look like an institution or school setting. Mr. O'Connor asked what impact the senior citizens have on the design of the center? Mr. Kojetin indicated that there are senior citizens on a committee that are working with the design. Mr. Kojetin reported that he has had conversations with Ray Smyth, Ken Rosland and Glen Smith who have been spearheading this committee to arrive at an agreement between the school and the city. Mr. Kojetin indicated that city crews could do some of the demolishing of a hallway wall that needs to be removed in order to make one room similar in size to the present one. The mechanical and other jobs could be bid for the new construction. It is hoped to have final approval for the plans and a recommendation to go ahead, around the first of. the year. Mr. Kojetin, will present more information to the Park Board as he receives it. Mr. Sour who serves on the Community Service Board indicated that he has been working with a committee and they are in favor of the project. Mr. O'Connor stated that he has received information from the School Board but they have not yet discussed it. IV. POOL REPORT Mr. Kojetin reviewed the proposal that the Park Board received. The first part of the report is the same portion that was mailed earlier in the year. The report gave the recommendation and conditions of the present pool to bring it up to code. In the proposed report there,are two plans. The first plan is to renovate the existing pool infrastructure to meet existing codes and yet-not offer any additional entertainment value. This plan would cost approximately $332,000. The second plan is to include Plan I plus the addition of water amenities that substantially add aquatic entertainment value to the existing facility. This plan would cost approximately $554,000. Mr. Kojetin pointed out that something definitely needs to be done to upgrade the pool to have it last at least 20 years. r Mr. Kojetin reported that the cities of Crystal and Winona have just completed their first season with aquatic entertainment and part of this report is based on their percentages. The City of Crystal charged two fees. One for a season pass and one for the slide. The City of Winona just raised their season ticket and the slide was included in the price. Both came out very well. Mr. Kojetin stated that by increasing the season ticket this would fund the capital cost of Plan II. It was asked how to distinguish who has a season ticket and who is just using the slide. Mr. Kojetin replied that different colored wrist bands are used, just like at.Edinborough. Other communities use this method and it works quite well. Mr. Jenkins asked if parking will be a problem? Mr,. Kojetin indicated that he did not feel this would be a problem. Mr. Montgomery asked if there would still be enough space for a sunbathing area? Mr. Keprios" indicated that this would be looked into by the architect or engineer should the project be approved. It was also noted that concrete would probably be surrounding the whole area and the grass would be taken out. Mr. Kojetin pointed out that an allowance for depreciation is not included in this report. The Park Board watched two videos on water slides and aquatic centers. Mr. Kojetin pointed out that the pool is ready to be painted again. This is usually done every three to four years with an epoxy coating. There is a new product out on the market that is said to.last approximately 10 years. The product is glued to the bottom of the pool including the black lane lines. It is also said to be effective in cold weather. An extensive investigation still needs to be done on this product. It is, however, used all around the country. Mr. Kojetin expressed to the Park Board that the deck does need to be replaced. With a new gutter system, code requires that all water needs to slope away from the pool. At-this time all of the deck slopes into the pool. Other areas that.need to be fixed are listed in the report. Mr. Jenkins asked what the difference would be to have two slides instead of one? It was pointed that if two slidds are put in at the same time there would be a savings, as opposed to adding a second adjoining slide at a later date. Otherwise the cost of a water slide is roughly $500 per 3 linear foot. It would be approximately $190,000 for two slides at this time. Mr. MacHolda indicated that he feels both pools would be used extensively, especially the wading pool. The slide will be able to occupy three people at the same time; one person at the end of the slide, one person in the middle of the slide and one person on the top of the slide for every 60 seconds. Mr. Kojetin.indicated that in the proposal there are two entertainment areas. One is the water slide and the other is the water play structure. The water play structure would be installed in the wading pool and is for the younger children. This offers two opportunities for a family coming to the swimming pool with children of different ages. Mr. Kojetin felt that it would be easier to charge an increase in the family season ticket rather than in the general admission. If a family wanted to use the 2 different water features only a family season ticket needs to be purchased. If a person purchased a general admission they would pay $3.00 for the pool including the water play structure but if they wanted to use the water slide it would cost an additional $3.00 for the day or a total of $6.00 general admission. Mr. Kojetin indicated that instead of proposing a dual water slide that the staff felt that-if two separate water features were offered it would be more appealing to the total family. With the fee structure that we have proposed the numbers come out very well showing that we will be able to pay for the bonds with the additional revenue from the increase of fees. Mr. MacHolda stated that there now is an average of 500 to 600 people using the pool on a daily basis. In the past, daily attendance has been as high as 2,000. Edina's population is starting to show an increase again in the younger ages. Mr. MacHolda indicated that pools need gimmicks and if the City of Edina is one of the first ones, than that is even better. There are also two country clubs that could possibly lose patrons because of the pool's gimmick. Also, people from other cities will be using the Edina Municipal Pool, especially if Edina is one of the first pools to provide an entertainment center with water amenities. Mr. O'Connor asked if there have been very many accidents on the slides? Mr. MacHolda indicated that there have not been. He stated that diving wells are where most accidents in pools occur. The slide industry and codes have changed dramatically in the last few years. Mr. Lord asked where the 34% increase came from? Mr. MacHolda indicated that the numbers are based on the City of Crystal and Winona. Mr. Jenkins questioned if there have been any down sides? Mr. Kojetin indicated that there really have not been. The biggest thing is to try and be the first city in the surrounding area to have an aquatic center. Mr. Lord asked if there has been a downtrend in attendance after a few years? Mr. Kojetin stated that most pools with aquatic centers have maintained a very constant attendance. 4 n Another point that was brought up was the use of the pool by the Edina Swim Club. Mr. MacHolda indicated that the Swim Club uses the pool at 5:30 a.m. and also in the afternoon. He pointed out that in the afternoon he allows the Swim Club to use a certain number of lanes. The remaining lanes are for the recreational swimmer. The question came up of possibly keeping the pool opened longer in the season. Mr. MacHolda indicated that actually they are trying to close the pool a week earlier. Edina has the longest pool season in the metro area. The statistics show that people are not using the pool until the very end of August. People are getting ready for fall. Mr. MacHolda indicated that the ideal situation would be to open the pool earlier and close it earlier. Paul O'Connor MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO ADOPT PLAN II FOR THE PROPOSED RENOVATION AND EDINA AQUATIC ENTERTAINMENT CENTER. Pat Vagnoni SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED. V. OTHER A. Update - Chemical Report Submitted to the City Council by the Health Board Mr. Kojetin indicated that the City Council had recommended that' the chemical report be resubmitted to the Health Board. The-Health Board will then submit it to the Park Board and.their Athletic Associations to review and resubmit to the City Council. B. Playground Equipment Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that new playground equipment has been installed at York Park and Pamela Park. The neighborhood is very pleased with what has been done. Chowen Park is the next park to be completed and Mr. Keprios and Mr. MacHolda have already met with a Chowen Park neighborhood group to get some input on the type of equipment to be put in the park. There appears to b.e a growing number of young children in that area. C. Brochure - Calendar Mr'. Keprios indicated to the Park Board that the recreation brochure calendar is just about finished. Everything is on schedule. Mr. Keprios pointed out that the only item he is waiting for is to see how the City Council will vote on the aquatic center and renovations. This will affect the fees and charges that need to be put into the calendar. VI. ADJOURNMENT Jean Rydell MOVED TO THE ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 9:05 P.M. James Fee SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED. 5 • 0 .- t PROPOSED. RENOVATION AND EDINA AQUATIC ENTERTAINMENT -CENTER' The Edina Municipal Swimming Pool was constructed 32 years ago on a beautiful park site, better known as Lake Cornelia Park. Throughout the 32 year period, the Edina Municipal Swimming Pool has served the public well in many ways. It has been a wonderful place to take the family to cool off, to learn to swim, to pursue competitive swimming and to simply sunbathe or socialize. It is the intention of this report to emphasize not only the hope for continued success into the 1990's but also to generate a renewed interest in the Edina Municipal Pool. This interest will be maintained as we stay up to date with the Aquatics Industry, as the industry continues to be innovative in making water fun. This report is an analysis of two renovation options, Plan I and Plan II: PLAN I Plan I is an option that will simply renovate the existing pool infrastructure to meet existing codes and yet not offer any additional entertainment value. PLAN II • Plan II is an option that includes all Plan I renovations plus the addition of water amenities that substantially add aquatic entertainment value to the existing facility. • • EDXNA PARR BOARD Bob Christianson, Chair Bill Jenkins, Vice Chair- James Fee Scott Johnson Bill Lord Andrew Montgomery Jean Rydell John (Mac) Thayer Patricia Vagnoni Beth Hall Chip Sour STAFF Full -Time Bob Kojetin, Director of Parks and Recreation Ed'MacHolda, Recreation Program Director and Edina Municipal Pool Supervisor • Part -Time Polly Pfeifer, Pool Manager • EDINA MUNICIPAL POOL RENOVATION PROGRAM TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Pool History & Description 2 Pool Condition 3 -5 Operational Conditions 6 -7 Renovation Needs 8 -12 Plan I 13 Plan II 14 Renovation Analysis 15 Fees and Attendance Analysis 16 Season Ticket Analysis 17 Season Ticket Financial Summary 18 Attendance /Revenue /Expense Comparison Report 19 Funding 20 -21 Crystal Municipal Pool /Water Slide 1990, 22 Seasonal Report Appendix - Concrete Core Analysis Fig. 1 - Pool Layout Fig. 2 - Gutter /Deck Section Fig. 3 - RenoSys Fig. 4 - Waterslide Fig. 5 - SCS Water Play Components • INTRODUCTION KESSION STATE EENT The mission of the EDINA MUNICIPAL POOL is to be a premier public aquatic facility and to make swimming accessible and affordable to primarily, but not exclusively, Edina residents and yet remain competitively priced within the Twin Cities area. It is the intent of this report to show the need to renovate and upgrade the Edina Municipal Pool to continue as a first -class facility in the City of Edina's continued interest for a family recreation aquatic center and as one of the premier facilities • in the Edina park system. • 1 • POOL HISTORY & DESCRIPTION GENERAL The Edina Municipal Swimming Pool was-constructed in 1958 at the corner of West 66th and Valley View Road. The location is now called Lake Cornelia Park. The "L" shaped pool has an area of 11,650 square feet and a volume of 450,000 gallons. The Junior Pool /Wading Pool has a combined capacity of 16,800 gallons. The pool water is treated by a diatomaceous earth vacuum filter system located in the filter room below the pool level. The 40'X85' .Bathhouse adjacent to the pool contains changing rooms, offices, toilets as well as public rest rooms for general park use. RENOVATIONS The pool facility received the following improvements in 1975: • New Filtration System * New Chemical Feed Systems * Re- sealing of Concrete Pool Joints * Electrical & General Lighting Brought up to Code * Replacement of Underwater Lights * Replacement of Perimeter Pool Supply Piping • Then in 1984 the pool facility received these additional upgrades: • Bathhouse Plumbing • Bathhouse Remodeling to meet Handicap Requirements * Pool Inlets * Filter Room Valves * Pool Painted Subsequent maintenance type improvements have been made in the last few years including replacement of the filter elements and rehabilitation of the circulation pump. 2 • • • POOL CONDITION +R As in all structures and mechanical equipment, time is an unrelenting enemy, especially those subject to public use. The Edina Pool Facility is no exception and needs an all around refurbishing. However, major elements have been upgraded and maintained and should perform well for the next 20 years. The following is a brief description 'of the major elements and their relative condition. BATHHOUSE ..The bathhouse, as previously described, was remodeled and upgraded five years ago to meet handicapped requirements. Other improvements to the plumbing system were also made. The only' major repair or, improvement to consider is the replacement of the corrugated plastic roof panels and some of the wood louvers. Replacement of those items could make the building more vandalproof to prevent off - season damage. POOL STRUCTURE The Swimming Pool and Wading /Junior Pools are reinforced concrete and are constructed over a granular base with an extensive under - drain system. The floors average about 6" in thickness and the walls are approximately 1011-thick. In May 1990 core samples of the floor and walls were taken. A copy of this report is included as an Appendix to this report. The conclusion of the report indicates that the pool concrete is in relatively sound condition. As described later, the joints, and cracks should be cleaned and re- sealed and a small area of delamination should be repaired. Assuming the.repairs are made, the pool structure is sound and would be quite satisfactory for at least another 20 years of service. During initial pool filling this spring, the underdrain piping was running full. The flow has now diminished considerably which would indicate the cracks have swollen shut. The repair of all cracks and joints described earlier would correct the problem. The pools need to'be painted. Unfortunately this is an on -going maintenance item to be considered every three or four years. 3 • DECK The concrete deck around the pool is in relatively good condition There have been many areas removed and replaced due to the repair and /or replacement of the recirculation system. There is also an extensive void below the slab by the north valve box. adjacent to the Junior /Wading Pool. A circulation gutter system replacement will 'require the removal of the deck adjacent to. the pool as well as other areas to replace piping. Present State Regulations now require the deck to slope away from the gutter. . Any modifications of the pool will require the pool. be.-brought into conformance because the deck now slopes towards the pool and gutter. The deck must be removed and replaced with a slope away- from the pool. In addition, drainage piping to. the storm sewer in the filter room should be constructed to carry the deck run -off to waste. CIRCULATION_ SYSTEM The circulation system consists of a 1350 GPM Fairbanks Morse Horizontal Splitcase Pump discharging through a rate -of -flow controller to a closed loop circumfrential pipe around the pool. The pipe varies from 611 to 311 and, has 29 inlets evenly spaced around the pool. The inlet piping was replaced with PVC in 1975 and inlet nozzles were replaced in 1985. A 4" PVC supply to the Junior /Wading Pool direct from the .filter room was installed in May of 1990 to improve pool inlet distribution and improve the flow to the Junior /Wading Pool. The pool has a main bottom drain return in the diving well and the gutter return around the entire pool perimeter. Each pipe returns to a small surge basin ahead of a trash screen. The Junior /Wading Pool also returns ahead of the screen. The surge basin discharges through a 10" line to the filter influent. FILTRATION EQUIPMENT The existing filter is a B.I.F. vacuum diatomaceous earth filter, capable of filtering 1400 GPM at a filtration rate of 2 Gal. /Sq. ft. of filter area. The-filter was installed in 1975. All of the filter elements were replaced prior to the 1989 season. A hair and lint catcher was installed on the.discharge side of the pump in 1989. The filter now performs satisfactorily when properly operated. 4 C7 • • CHEMICAL FEED EQUIPMENT New chemical feed equipment including a chlorinator residual analyzer and caustic soda pH control feed system was installed in 1975. In 1985 they were replaced with a new pH and chlorine control unit as manufactured by Natatron. In the last few years make -shift improvements and /or replacements to the caustic and chlorine chemical feed equipment has been made. A diatomaceous earth slurry feeder was also supplied in_ 1975 but its operation has been plagued by difficulty and has not been used consistently. Consequently, the filter needs frequent backwashes because there is not a continuous D.E. build -up on the filter leaves to screen the dirt and other materials returning to the filter. 5 • OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS The filtration /circulation system as now exists is being operated at its functional limit. The water quality is one if not the most important aspect of pool operation. The three major problems are as follows: * Short Filter Runs - The length of runs between backwashes is obviously dependent on the quality, primarily the turbidity of the water coming to the filter. However, the most important operational consideration in lengthening filter runs is the continous addition of diatomaceous earth (D.E.) particles. This is done with a continuous body feeder which feeds. the filter D.E. slurry to maintain a porous mat of interlaced particles to most efficiently trap the suspended solids and other foreign material and body oils. The filter and internal filter leaves are in very good condition. The 24 filter leaves were replaced prior to the 1989 season. Our recommendation is to the existing filter. However, new slurry feed equipment should be installed. • * - Pool Chemistry The State of Minnesota requires by statute MS144.05, Chapter 4717 that certain water quality factors be maintained. To avoid lengthy detailed technical discussion of pool chemistry, suffice it to say that ..maintaining the proper pH, chlorine residual and alkalinity of the,water is a difficult task without_ proper, equipment. Although the pool summer staff should understand the general concept of water quality, they should not by adjusting the equipment manually and individually. The chlorinator and caustic feeder and related flow meters. and analyzers should be a compatible, "user friendly" and coordinated system. As previously described the existing equipment has been "piecemealed" over the years and is not entirely dependable. * Pool Circulation - Prior to the 1990 season a temporary 4" line direct to the Junior /Wading Pool from the filter room was installed. This was done to improve circulation to both pools. Originally the small pool was fed off the east end of the main pool. Calcium carbonate build -up, due in part to chemical and hydraulic imbalance, created problems of water distribution control in both pools, especially in the flow to the Junior /Wading Pool. In general the entire • pool circulation system needs to be replaced. Although repairs and replacements have been done 'in previous years, the system is difficult to monitor and control due to piping, valving and metering restraints. • • The location of the hair and lint catcher is an .example of problem piping. The catcher was installed downstream of the filter and pump instead of ahead of the filter primarily because it was used to prevent clogging of the. rate of flow controller. It should remove the material prior to the filter to help lengthen filter runs. In that position it will still function as a screen for the rate -of -flow controller. 7 • RENOVATION NEEDS GENERAL Based upon the previous information regarding the conditions and operating problems of the pool, we are recommending the following improvements with an indicated budget cost. * Repair and re -coat the concrete pool structures * Install a new stainless steel gutter and circulation system * Refurbish filter room piping * Install a new pool heater * Install new chemical feed and control equipment * Replace the Wading /Junior Pool temporary supply with new • permanent piping and separate chemical feed points * Replace deck for drainage away from pool and gutter Other selected improvements could be added based upon budget and program limitations. • • Install a water slide • Expand the deck area to cover existing grass area • Install new diving boards and starting platforms • Install new underwater lights The following improvements are recommended at this time: POOL STRUCTURE As indicated earlier the structure is in -good condition. However, all joints should be completely cleaned and resealed. In addition, one area in the diving end has experienced some scaling and delamination and should be repaired. 8 • Both pools need re- painting. Several options of coatings are available. * Chlorinated Rubber has been used for years and provides 2 to 3 years of services. The cost is approximately $1.25 to $1.75 /SF. * Epoxy paints have been improved and offer an excellent surface and resistance to chemicals, algae and other abrasions. Costs range from $1.50 to $2.00 /SF and applications should last 4 to 6 years. * PVC liners are also being used in concrete pools. An envelope of reinforced PVC is welded together inside the old pool completely eliminating leaks, the need to paint or plaster, the need to caulk, sandblast, scrape or deal with the old shell's problem. Costs are approximately $7.00 /SF. It is the Park and Recreation Department staff's recommendation \that the RenoSys PVC Liner be the 'choice for this pool. This product has a 10 year warranty, 25 year life expectancy and never needs painting. Estimated Cost - RenoSys PVC Pool Shells $60,000 GUTTER SYSTEM The existing roll -out concrete gutter system constructed as part of the. pool structure works hydraulically _but the removable grates are an operational problem. The buried circulation %distribution piping below the deck has the inherent problem of inaccessibility. In addition, the inlet nozzles are not all functioning properly. The best solution is the removal of the existing gutter and supply piping and the installation of a stainless steel system.' The advantages of a stainless steel gutter system include accessible piping, continous gutter flow, and entire pool surface skimming. Although there are many manufacturers of stainless steel gutters, we have discussed this project with two manufacturers which distribute locally. Installed budget costs of both the Paddock System and the Whitten System a. re presented here. Whitten System - The Whitten Uniflow System, represented locally by Baker Pools, is the system installed at Edinborough. It contains a PVC supply pipe inside the gutter section and a PVC grate with hydraulically sized 9 • openings to prevent gutter surcharge (flooding) and maintain an adequate hydraulic gradient. Connections to the supply and return piping are made at a converter. Also located at the, converter is a stillwell to monitor the water elevation and control a fill line to the system. During periods of quiescent surface skimming, the water level is 1/1611 above the gutter lip. The system may be designed with either the surge capacity built into the pool and gutter system or with • separate surge tank., It is our recommendation to not use • separate surge tank. Estimated Cost - Whitten System Stainless Steel Guuter $ 105,000 Paddock System - The Paddock System, represented locally by Associated Pool Builders, has a variety of gutter designs and differs by the fact the supply conduit is a stainless steel section of the gutter as opposed to a PVC conduit. Paddock has recommended the IFRS - ASR Gutter which is similar in overall shape to the Whitten Gutter. The Paddock Gutter has surge weirs that maintain the quiescent water • level approximately 1 -1/2" below the gutter lip. Estimated Cost — Paddock System Stainless Steel Gutter $ 115,000 • Both Gutter Systems will work effectively and meet current and proposed Minnesota Department of Health rules, and would require approximately the same installation effort and cost. A budget estimate for each gutter is given here. When bids are taken a competitively bid alternate for each gutter will be received. Based upon the price and other factors such as delivery and operational features a,final decision will be made. In addition to the cost of furnishing and installing the new gutter the cost of removing the existing concrete gutter must be included. Estimated Cost - Existing Gutter,Removal $ 42,500, FILTER ROOM PIPING- The present piping should be revised to accommodate connections to the new stainless steel gutter system, connection to .a new pool heater and the miscellaneous chemical feed and control piping. The larger gate valves were replaced in 1984 and in good condition. The other valves including the 'modulating butterfly ill] • valves were installed in 1975. The older valves should be replaced and the pneumatic operators serviced. Flow control and measuring devices should be installed to accurately indicate all flows and provide the means for achieving and maintaining proper pool chemistry to both the Main Pool and the Junior /.Wading Pool. Estimated Cost - Filter Room Piping POOL HEATER A new pool heater is required to replace type. The heater indicated would be increase of approximately 20 degrees. Estimated Cost - Pool Heater CHEMICAL FEED EQUIPMENT $ 25,000 the 'existing open tank rated for a temperature $ 12,000 A complete replacement of the chemical feed equipment and monitoring /recording /measuring equipment should be done. Estimated Cost - Chemical Feed Equipment $ 10,000 JUNIOR /WADING POOL SUPPLY The temporary 4" supply line from the filter room should be replaced with a permanent line tied into the new filter room piping and equipped with the required flow measuring devices and'chemical feed points. Although the proposed Minnesota State Statutes call for a separate recirculation system for wading pools, we are proposing tieing the separate supply and return lines into a common filter. With separate chemical feed and piping we feel that the required pool chemistry can be maintained. Approval from the Commissioner for this design would be obtained prior to preparation of constuction documents. Included in the supply pipe installation would the 5 spray inlets and required piping through Junior /Wading Pool. Estimated Cost - Junior /Wading Pool Supply Pipe 11 be replacement of the walls of the $ 10,000 • is • Ab REPLACE DECK AREA As indicated previously, Minnesota State Health Department Rules require the deck must slope away from the gutter of the pool at a slope of at least 1 /4 " /Ft. To achieve this, the deck within 81'-0" of the pool must be removed and a new deck with a reversed slope installed. Area drains will be added to capture the deck surface run -off and return it to waste in the filter room. Because the gutter replacement will necessitate removing at least 4' -0!' of deck, the impact.of this improvement will be somewhat lessened. Estimated Cost of Deck Removal & Replacement $ 21,000 Estimated Cost of Deck Drains & Piping $ 6,500 Estimated Cost of Extending Deck Over Grass Area $ 12,000 12 _. • • • PLAN I EDINA MUNICIPAL POOL RENOVATION TO MEET CODE * Install New Stainless Steel Gutter $152,500.00 * Install New Supply Line to'Junior Pool 10,000.00 • Revise Filter Room Piping 25,000.00 • Revis'e Chemical Feed Equipment, Controls 22,000.00 and Pool Heater • Replace Deck Area 28,000.00 • Repair & Re -coat the Pool Structures 60.000.00 Total Estimated Construction Cost $297,000.00 Contingencies 15,000.00 Engineering Plans & Specifications 20.000.00 Total Estimated 1991 Project Cost $332,000.00 13 , _J. • PLAN II EDINA AQUATIC ENTERTAINMENT CENTER * Install New Stainless Steel Gutter $152,000 * Install New Supply Line to Junior Pool 10,000 * Revise Filter Room Piping 25,000 * Replace Chemical Feed Equipment, Controls 22,000 and Pool Heater * Replace Deck Area 28,000 * Extend Deck and Parental Viewing Area 15,000 * Install New RenoSys PVC Pool Shell 60,000 * Install New Dive Stands 6,000 * Install New Lifeguard Chairs 6,000 * Purchase Picnic Tables Chaise Lounges and q 0 5 00 a Funbrella * Install Wading Pool Water Features 60,000 * Install a Waterslide 125,000 * Engineering Plans & Specifications 25,000 Total $554,000 is 14 • • • EDINA MUNICIPAL POOL RENOVATION ANALYSIS SUMMARY s Plan I Cost $ 332,000 PROJECTED 1991 OPERATING BUDGET Plan I Total Revenues $ 99,880 Total Expenses 133,923 Total Income(loss) $ (34,043) Plan II $ 554,000 Plan II $ 185,801 178,690 $ 7,111 DETAILED ANALYSIS OF PROJECTED 1991 OPERATING BUDGET REVENUES Plan I Plan II Season Tickets $ 56,921 $ 104,985 General Admissions 19,986 38,971 Waterslide Admissions NA 9,741 Concessions 13,473 23,811 Rentals 8,018 8,018 Other 275 275 Total Revenues $ 99,880 $185,801 EXPENSES Personal Services $ 70,313 $ 90,280 Contractual Services 14,891 17,891 Commodities 14,419 15,419 Central Services 2,000 2,000 101,623 125,590 Debt Service 32,300 53,100 Total Expenses $133,923 $178,690 Total Income (loss) $(34,043) $ 7,111 15 • • FEES AND ATTENDANCE ANALYSIS. FOR PROPOSED AQUATIC CENTER FEES Under Plan I, the proposed 1991 fees for season tickets and general admissions would remain, the same as 1990 fees. Also, under Plan I, 1991 total attendance is projected to remain the same as 1990 total attendance. Under Plan II, fees are proposed to increase over 1990 fees as follows: Season Tickets Resident Individual Resident Family Non - Resident Individual Non - Resident Family General Admission Daily Admission Waterslide Admission Daily Admission (unlimited rides) 1990 Fees 113 @_$30 $ 3,390.00 950 @ $46 $43,700.00 51 @ $36 $ 1,836.00 191 @ $54 $10.314.00 $59,240.00 $ 2.50 NA 1991 Proposed Fees (Plan II) 120 @ $50 $ 6,000.00 1215 @ $65 $ 78,975.00 56 @ $60 $ 3,360.00 222 @ $75 $ 16,650.00 $104,985.00 $ 3.00 $ 3.00 Under Plan II, the projected 1991 attendance is expected to increase approximately 34% over 1990's attendance. 1991 Proposed Fees Total Attendance 1990 (Plan II) (34% Increase) 52,599 70,599 Based on a 75 Day Season 701 /Daily 940 /Daily The increase in attendance and,anticipated revenues, directly reflects the City of Crystal's increases from 1989 to 1990 with the addition of one water amenity. 16 • EDINA MUNICIPAL POOL SEASON TICKET ANALYSIS 17 APRIL 16 1986 1988 2 44 RESIDENT. RESIDENT NON- RESIDENT NON- RESIDENT NON- RESIDENT MONTH INDIVIDUAL FAMILY INDIVIDUAL FAMILY TOTAL MAY 10 89 1 11 111 JUNE 142 794 21 166 1123 JULY 19 105 9 36 169 AUGUST 2' 7 4 1 3 TOTALS 173 988 31 214 1406 17 APRIL 16 1987 1988 2 44 RESIDENT RESIDENT NON- RESIDENT NON- RESIDENT NON- RESIDENT MONTH INDIVIDUAL FAMILY INDIVIDUAL FAMILY TOTAL MAY 16 66 8 13 103 JUNE 132 919 40 253 1344 JULY 21 i 59 8 9 97 AUGUST 5 7 4 8 20 TOTALS 174 1051 56 283 1564 17 APRIL 16 1989 1988 2 44 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT NON- RESIDENT NON- RESIDENT INDIVIDUAL FAMILY MONTH INDIVIDUAL FAMILY INDIVIDUAL FAMILY TOTAL 7 MAY * BREAKDOWN UNKNOWN * 20 221 11 59 JUNE 142 841. 83 228 1294 710 JULY 10 40 4 31 85 AUGUST AUGUST 11 4 6 1 22 125 TOTALS 163 885 93 260 1401 17 APRIL 16 1989 4 2 44 RESIDENT RESIDENT NON - RESIDENT NON- RESIDENT 2 MONTH INDIVIDUAL FAMILY INDIVIDUAL FAMILY TOTAL APRIL 19 149 7 29 204 MAY 20 221 11 59 311 JUNE 62 498 39 111 710 JULY 14 112 14 6 146 AUGUST 10 3 5 0 18 TOTALS 125 983 76 205 1389 1990 RESIDENT RESIDENT NON - RESIDENT NON- RESIDENT 17 APRIL 16 22 4 2 44 MAY 4 111. 2 4 121 JUNE 73 756. 38 166 1033 JULY 16 55 6 18 95 AUGUST 4 6 1 1 12 TOTALS 113 950 51 191 1305 17 • EDINA MUNICIPAL POOL SEASON TICKET FINANCIAL SUMMARY 1986 TYPE - # SOLD PRICE PER TOTAL - RESIDENT INDIVIDUAL 173 $25.00 $4,325.00 RESIDENT FAMILY 988 40.00 39,520.00 NON- RESIDENT INDIVIDUAL 31 30.00 930.00 NON - RESIDENT FAMILY 214 45.00 9.630.00 TOTAL 283 50.00 $54,405.00 C� 1987 1 TYPE # SOLD PRICE PER TOTAL RESIDENT.INDIVIDUAL 174 $28.00 $4,872.00 RESIDENT FAMILY 1051 44.00 46,244.00 NON- RESIDENT INDIVIDUAL 56 33.00 1,848.00 NON - RESIDENT FAMILY 283 50.00 14.150.00 TOTAL $67,114.00 C� 1988 TYPE # SOLD PRICE PER TOTAL RESIDENT INDIVIDUAL 163 $28.00 $4,564.00 RESIDENT FAMILY 885 44.00 38,940.00 NON - RESIDENT INDIVIDUAL 93 33.00 3,069.00 NON- RESIDENT FAMILY 260 50.00 13,000.00 MAY 7.576.00 TOTAL $67,149.00 C� 18 1989 TYPE # SOLD PRICE PER TOTAL RESIDENT INDIVIDUAL 125 $30.00 $3,750.0.0 RESIDENT FAMILY 983 46.00 45,218.00 NON - RESIDENT INDIVIDUAL 76 36.00 2,736.00 NON- RESIDENT FAMILY q 205 54.00 11.070.00 TOTAL $62,774.00 18 1990 TYPE # SOLD PRICE PER TOTAL RESIDENT INDIVIDUAL 113 $30.00 $3,390.00 RESIDENT FAMILY 950 46.00 43,700.00 NON - RESIDENT INDIVIDUAL 51 36.00 1,836.00 NON- RESIDENT FAMILY 191 , 54.00 10.314.00 TOTAL $59,240.00 18 EDINA MUNICIPAL POOL ATTENDANCE /REVENUE /EXPENSE COMPARISON REPORT 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 ATTENDANCE 66,658 62,456 45,953 50,567 55,595 62,141 53,167 52,559 70,599 REVENUE Season Tickets 41,509 46,773 46,911 50,202 63,182 63,364 54,184 .56,921 104,997 General Admissions 19,344 17,699 14,647 18,093 21,151 27,139 30,155 19,986 38,971 Water Slide Admission - - - - - - - - 9,741 Rentals 5,000 7,715 6,904 9,448 7,720 8,763 8,018 9,225 8,018 Concessions 12,267 12,368 9,772 12,094 10,408 11,685 11,802 13,473 23,811 Registration Fees - - - 1,288 - Other 364 570 217 319 137 56 36 275 275 TOTAL REVENUE 78,484 85,125 78,451 91,444 102,598 111,007 104,195 . .99,880 185,801 EXPENSES Personal Services 41,893 42,491 46,746 53,895 65,847 67,425 62,573 70,313 90,280 Contractual Services 23,871 22,216 22,045 22,257 32,658 17,371 18,845 14,891 17,891 Commodities 16,957 14,219 15,208 12,420 11,995 14,301 7,338 14-,419 15;419 Central Services 5,940 6,240 6,840 7,380 9,960 7,140 7,500 2,000 2,000 Depreciation 11,537 12,500 17,808 16,904 15,603 15,828 17,085 17,076 Other 109 - - - - - - - - TOTAL EXPENSES 100,307 97,666 108,647 112,856 136,063 122,065 113,341 118,699 123,590 OPERATING INCOME (21,823) (12,541) (30,196) (21,412) (33,465) (11,058) (9,146) (18,819) 62,211 28- No_v -90 PLAN I,.- RENOVATION TO MEET CODE AMORTIZATION 20 PRINCIPAL AMOUNT 1332,000 BONDS SOLD MARCH 1991 FIRST INTEREST PAYMENT SEPT. 91 INTEREST RATE 7.25% BEGINNING ENDING DEBT YEARS ------------------------------------------ BALANCE PRINCIPAL INTEREST - - - BALANCE - SERVICE SEP 91 332,000 0 12,035 -- ---------------- 332,000 12,035 MAR 92 332,000 0 12,035 3.32,000 12,035 SEP 92 332,000 0 12,035 332,000 12,035 MAR 93 332,000 9,000 12,035 323,000 21,035 SEP 93 .323,000 . 0 11,709 323,000 11,709 MAR 94 323,000 9,000 11,709 314,00.0 20,709 SEP 94 314,000 0 11,383 314,000 11,383 MAR 95 314,000 10,000 11,383 304,000 21,383 SEP 95 304,000 0 11,020 304,000 11,020 MAR 96 304,000 10,000 11,020 294,000 21,020 SEP 96 294,000 0 10,658 294,000 10,658 MAR 97 294,000 11,000 10,658 283,000 21,658 SEP 97 283,000 0 10,259 283,000 10,259 MAR 98 283,000 12,000 10,259 271,000 22,259 SEP 98 271,000 0 9,824 271,000 9,824 MAR 99 271,000 13,000 9,824 258,000 22,824 SEP 99 258,000 0 9,353 .258,000 9,353 MAR 00 258,000 14,000 9,353 244,000 23,353 SEP 00 244,000 0, 8,845 244,000 8,845 MAR 01 244,000 15,000 8,845 229,000 23,845 SEP 01 229,000 0 8,301 229,000 8,301 MAR 02 229,000 16,000 8,301 213,000 24,301 SEP 02 213,000 1 0 7,721 213,000 7,721 MAR 03 213,000 18,000 7,721 195,000 25,721 SEP 03 195,000 0 7,069 195,000 7,069 MAR 04 195,000 19,000 7,069 176,000 26,069 SEP 04 176,000 0 6,380 176,000 6,380 MAR 05 176,000. 20,000 6,380 156,000 26,330 SEP 05 156,000 0 5,655 156,000 5,655 MAR 06 156,000 22,000 5,655 134,000 2.7,655 SEP 06 134,000 0 4,858 134,000 4,858 MAR 07 134,000 23,000 4,858 111,000 27,858 SEP 07 111,000 0 4,024 111,000 4,024 MAR 08 111,000 25,000 4,024 86,000 29,024 SEP 08 86,000 0 3,118 86,000 3,118 MAR 09 86,000 27,000 3,118 59,000 30,118 SEP 09 59,000 0 2,139 59,000 2,139 MAR 10 59,000. 29,000 2,139 30',000 31,139 SEP 10 30,000 0 1,088 30,000 1,088 MAR --------------------------=--------------------------------------- 11 30,000 3.0,000 1,088 0 31,088 332,000 314,940 Average annual debt service - 32,300 20 • 28- Nov -90 PLAN II - EDINA AQUATIC ENTERTAINMENT CENTER AMORTIZATION PRINCIPAL AMOUNT 554,000 BONDS SOLD MARCH 1991 FIRST INTEREST PAYMENT SEPT. 91 INTEREST RATE 7.25% BEGINNING ENDING DEBT YEARS ------------------------------------------------------------------ BALANCE PRINCIPAL INTEREST BALANCE SERVICE SEP 91 0 554,000 0 20,083 554,000 .20,083 MAR 92 554,000 0 20,083 554,000 20,083 SEP 92 554,,000 0 20,083 554,000 20,083 MAR 93 554,000 14,000 20,083 540,000 34,083 SEP 93 540,000 0 19,575 540,000 19,575 MAR 94 540,000 15,000 19,575 525,000 34,575 SEP 94 525,000 0 19,031 525,000 19,031 MAR 95 525,000 16,000 19,031 509,000 35,031 SEP 95 509,000 0 18,451 509,000 18,451 MAR 96 509,000 18,000. 18,451 491,000 36,451 SEP 96 491,000 0 17,799 491,000 17,799 MAR 97 491,000 20,000 17,799 471,000 37,799 SEP 97 .471,000 0 17,074 471,000 17,074 MAR 98 471,000 21,000 17,074 450,000 38,074 SEP 98 450,000 0 16,312 450,000 16,312 MAR 99 450,000 23,000 16,312 427,000 39,313 SEP 99 427,000 0 15,479 427,000 15,479 MAR 00 427,000 24,000 15,479 403,000 39,479 SEP 00 403,000 0 14,609 403,000 14,609 MAR 01 403,000 26,000 141609 377,000 40,609 SEP 01 377,000 0 13,666 377,000 13,666 MAR 02 377,000 27,000 13,666 350,000 40,666 SEP 02 350,000 0 12,688 350,000 12,688 MAR 03 350,000 29,000 12,688 321,000 41,688 SEP 03 321,000 0 11,636 321,000 11,636 MAR 04 321,000 31,000 11,636 290,000 42,636 SEP 04 290,000 0 10,513 290,000 10,513 MAR 05 290,000 33,000 10,513 257,000 43,513 SEP 05 257,000 0 9,316 257,000 9,316 MAR 06 257,000 36,000 9,316 221,000 45,316 SEP 06 221,000 0 8,011 221,000 8,011 MAR 07 221,000 38,000 8,011 183,000 46,011 SEP 07 183,000' 0 6,634 183,000 6,634 MAR 08 183,000 42,000 6,634 141,000 48,634 SEP 08 141,000 0 5,111 141,000 5,111 MAR 09 141,000 44,000 5,111 97,000 49,111 SEP 09 97,000 0 3,516 97,000 3,516 MAR 10 97,000 46,000 3,516 51,000 49,516 SEP 10 51,000 0 1,849 51.,000 1.,849 MAR ------------------------------------------------------------------ 11 51,000 51,000 1,849, 0 52,849 554,000 522,870 • Average annual debt service - 53,000 21 • CRYSTAL MUNICIPAL POOL /WATERSLIDE 1990 Seasonal Report *Pool closed for season on August 26, 1990 (1 week later than 1989) Cost of slide - $183,000 22 1989 1990 A. Membership 1. Resident Family, 443 562 2. Non - Resident Family 219 255 _ 3. Resident Single 96 102 4. Non - Resident Single 38 42 796 960 B. Attendance 1. Total Daily Attendance 36,028 50,980 2. Highest Daily Attendance .1,186 1,700 *3. Total Days Open 67 67 C. Swim Instruction Program 579 628 D. Income 1. Gross Income /Pool Membership $ 25,460 $ 32;912 2. Gross Income /Concessions 9,676 18,758 3. Gross Income /Daily Admissions 14,448 24,901, 4. Gross Income /Slide Operation 0 41,159 Sales Tax 2,975 7,062 5. Misc. Income (Rentals, state meet, etc.) 1,857 52,560 126,653 E. Expenses 1. Personal Services $35,486 $52,2'09 2. Supplies, Repairs, Conc. 13,705 22,558 3. Telephone, Advertising, Printing 371 996 4. Utilities 12,520 14,516 5. Contractual Repair, Licenses, etc. 829 1,728 Taxes 6. Capital Outlay 6,034 6,620 7. Slide Expense -0- 6,987 (Bands, Misc.) Total Pool and Slide Expenses, 68,945 105,614 *Pool closed for season on August 26, 1990 (1 week later than 1989) Cost of slide - $183,000 22 • APPENDIX • �J .J V& MINNESOTA Mmneaoobs •Hibbmg S. Cloud Rochester St. Paul AFRUATEO OFFICES NORTH OAKOTA Bismarck Williston Minot MONTANA Billings Bozeman ILLINOIS Chicago J.S. Braun. P E. May 29 IF 19 9 0 Cameron G. Kruse. P E Geo. D. KluemDxe. P E Paul H. Anderson David R. Hausler. P E Roger V. Blomomst. PhDIndeco James iq.E, Jr,.PE Allen, Dale R Auen. P. Attn: Mr. Richard M. Greenlee Wm M Wevraucn.P Thomas R Blumberg E 4600 West 77th Street Michael M. Heuer. P E Suite #140 Kurt E. Dvorak Norman E. Hall Edina, MN 55435 qav A, Huuer P E William K Cody. P.E AFFILIATED COMPANIES RE: 90 -239 CONCRETE POOL EVALUATION Braun Envnonmemai Laboratories, Inc -Cornelia, Park Braun Pavemem Edina Minnesota Technologies. Inc , � R RA u •■ Quality Services Since 1957 n CONSULTING ENGINEERS/ ENGINEERING TESTING GEOTECHNICAL AND MATERIALS Reply to address/phone K: 6800 South TH -169 P.O. Box 35108 Mpls, MN 55435 (612) 941 -5600 FAX #941 -4151 Dear Mr. Greenlee: This report summarizes our recent engineering observations and concrete core strength testing performed for the concrete pool at Cornelia Park in Edina, Minnesota. The purpose of our services, which were authorized by you, was to evaluate the general conditions of the concrete in the floor and walls of the pool and to check the reinforcing steel in one selected location. SERVICES PERFORMED On May 16, 1990, Braun obtained four cores, three from the floor and one from the wall of the pool. The locations of these cores are given on the attached data' sheets. Two of the cores taken from the floor and the one from the wall were used to determine the compressive strength of the concrete at those locations. The - fourth core was taken through a, crack and intentionally contained reinforcing steel. It was assumed that. this location may contain the most deteriorated reinforcing steel in the pool. This assumption was made because the existing crack may allow moisture and chemicals an easier access to the steel. Cracks were observed along the floor and the walls. One delamination was noted and its location is shown on 'the attached sketch. 90 -239 Indeco -2- May 29, 1990 CONCLUSION Based on the compressive strength test results and our visual observations, it appears concrete in the pool is relatively sound. Visual observations of the core containing the reinforcing steel indicates.minor corrosion. Additional testing can be performed to determine the extent and severity of the steel corrosion. We recommend that all cracks be . sealed to prevent further access of moisture and chemicals. Delaminated areas should be examined closely to check the extent of delamination in that area. GENERAL All samples obtained for this project will be kept for 60 days after which time they will be disposed of. Services performed by the materials engineers for this project have been conducted with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in this area. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Thank you for using Braun. If there are questions regarding the content of this report, or if we may be of further service, please call us at your convenience. Very truly yours, BRAUN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. Gregory . Bialon Graduate Engineer (612) 941 -5600 Professional Certification: I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State esot . Tarif Jaber, P.E. Senior Materials Engineer Registration Number: 19872 (612) 942 -4834 GJB /TMJ:kaj /CMT \RPT \90 -239 Attachments: Data Sheets Sketch cc: City of Edina Attn: Mr. Bob Kojetin U n 'ONCRETE CORE COMPRESSION TEST REPORT Test Method: ASTM C 42 WESOTA: MinneVV& HitlhincStigudf3nchOester. St. Paul Reply to:., Mpls., MN 5155435 (612) 941 -5600 I BRAUR'.* Quality Services Since 1957 ENGINEERING TESTING DATE: May 24, 199 0 AtMeY0 0 1Apc B�smarc Williston a Minot. No PROJECT #: 90-235 REPO3gsj' go:e,jn. MT Crnugo. 4 17LIENT: Indeco PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Attn: Mr. Richard M. Greenlee Concrete Pool Investigation 4600 W 77th St. Suite 140. Cornelia Park Edina,-MN 55435 Edina, MN Core Number: Date Cast: Date Cored: Date Tested: Cored Length (in.) before capping: after capping: Diameter (in.): Ratio: D Correction Factor: Area. (sq.. in.) : Ultimate Load (.lbs.) Corrected Compression Strength (psi): 1 N/G 5/16/90 5,/18/90 4.77 4.97 3.74 1.33 0.94 10.99 104,610 8950 F, N/G 5/16/90 5/18/90 5.63 5:82 3.74 1.56 0.96 10.99 93,680 8180 N/G 5/16/90 5/18/90 5.63 5.82 3.74 1.56 0.96 10.99 94,480 8250 Location Rebar Location # None Bottom End View: # None Bottom End View: # None Bottom End View: 1 Floor 3814 11N, 1411 "E Of SW corner of pool. 2 Wall 7718 11E of SW corner of pool (18 "down). 3 Floor 2919 "N, 171W of SE corner of pool. Top Top Top REMARKS: r amples tested in dry wet X condition. ominal maximum size of aggregate: Cores #1 & #3 lin.. core #2 3/4 in, 4ore(s) with Rebar present: None Location irection of load application on the core with respect to the horizontal 1ane of concrete as placed: Perpendicular Specified compressive strength: Not Given psi BRAUN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. .�, Grego Bialon _Graduate Engineer ,yh \conc \rpt \90239.123 BRAUR'" Z LEGEND ® Delamanation Cracks Sketch 90 -239 Pool Evaluation Cornelia Park Edina, Minnesota 5 -21 -90 IRe GJB NONE • POOL LAYOUT SCALE: -'ti • I'-d' • EENC9.. PnOP056D WAITE W V:1470k,ROCM • NEW STAINLESS STEEL N_ OM. or S` GUTTER ( CIRCULATION PIPING 1 NEW CONCRETE DECK • - p.- •e. D n.. p SUPPLY NOZZELS TO BE CORED OUT E WALL PLUGGED GUTTER /DECK SECTION SCALE: III /i' - 1' -0" NEW DECK DRAIN SAW CUT EXIST. GONG. DECK ExPANS10N JOINT -- NEW DECK DRAIN RETURN TO WA5EE IN FILTER ROOM EDINA MUNICIPAL POOL CORNELIA PARK EDINA, MINNESOTA lricieCC3 FIG. NO. Z JULY 1990 1 - W 1 EXIST. CONC. WALA. DECK GUTTER TO BE REMOVED F I - GROUT J N I NOTE: n •P 1 ":° 0' " . ° .• 1 TIIE WATER LEVEL WILL REMAIN UNCHANGED FROM PRESENT GUTTER CONFIGURATION. f EXIST. CIRCULATION PIPING _ - -- _ _ — _ — _ _� •1_ _ / ¢ SUPPORTS TO BE REMOVED SUPPLY NOZZELS TO BE CORED OUT E WALL PLUGGED GUTTER /DECK SECTION SCALE: III /i' - 1' -0" NEW DECK DRAIN SAW CUT EXIST. GONG. DECK ExPANS10N JOINT -- NEW DECK DRAIN RETURN TO WA5EE IN FILTER ROOM EDINA MUNICIPAL POOL CORNELIA PARK EDINA, MINNESOTA lricieCC3 FIG. NO. Z JULY 1990 0 • • RENOVATION OPTIONS ' V C S h e P o x y a i - t � b b e r P a n . t i b e r g I s P a s I e r e t a I w I A comparison of common swimming pool renova- ion options. (Pricing may vary due to size and project location.) issurfatxtotally water impermiabie7 Yes No No Yes No Yes Does surface ever require repainting? No Yes Yes May No May Surface cleans relatively easily7 Yes, Yes No Yes No- Yes Does it evenly bridge and seal largecrwks7 Yes No No No No Yes Does surface install well over aluminum? Yes May No May No N/A Is material suspended in pool? Yes No No No No No May it be installed over pea gravel? Yes No No No No No Life expectancy? (In years) 25. 2.4 1.2 4-9 3-5 25. Non - abrasive anti -slip surface? Yes No No No No No tengthof typ.warranty7 (yrs) 10 1 1 3 -5 1 5 Approx.square foot cost? (S) $7 $2 $1 $6 $5 $45 Dependant on bond to old surface? No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Pore -free anti -algae surface? Yes No No No No Yes and the pool's condition will per- mit. This can work well for a while. but when leaks get the upper hand, this approach can be more ex- pensive over time than simply fixing the problem, for it couple of rea- sons. First of all. %rater, chemical. and heat losses can really acid up when they are leaving your pool shell through cracks and leaks. Second, the cold makeup water can send pool attendance down the tubes and heating bills through the roof. Last, the regular drain on man- agement, staff, and budgets pulls good people and funds away from more important projects. When you factor in the reduced maintenance and cleaning costs of a PVC mem- brane, renovating can be very cost - effective. The usual approach to pool shell renovation has hinged around the 4WH ILY 1990/11&R concept c tl extensively sandblasting, etching, and cleaning the old pool shell and somehow getting some material ( fiherglass, acrylic, epoxy or whatever) to adhere through a chemical and mechanical bond to the old concrete or metal pool shell. The problems crop up when the pool goes through its normal ex- pansion and contraction cycles. Since the renovation materials have different rates of expansion and contraction than the existing pool shell, they separate from the exist- ing Wall and delaminate. Pinholing where rigid materials have been subjected to this stress allows water to get behind the membrane. The freeze/thaw cycle then finishes off the installation by blowing the material off the wall. In contrast, a PVC membrane allows the existing pool shell to expand and contract since the membrane is only con- nected to the shell at the pool peri- meter. Success with attached rigid con- cepts like fiberglass and epoxy de- pends on applicator experience, de- gree of surface prep performed, humidity, and temperature when the system in installed Since many, liquid resins have a limited shelf life and depend on accurate field mix- ing and measurements, this can also pose problems. In general, rigid renovation concepts have only worked in pools that are either in- doors or south of the freeze zones. In fact, most such system's warran- ties are voided if the pool is ever drained in the winter. Unfortunatelv, nothing in this world is perfect, and PVC mem- branes have their own problems. Any material may be vandalized, and PVC can be cut by a particularly sharp razor knife. Although you can easily repair cuts even underwater, pools that experience heavy off- season vandalism, skateboarding and bonfires are probably not good candidates for any kind of renova- tion without additional security measures. Any tar products (brought in on the bottom of feet) will lightly discolor a PVC mem- brane. Additionally, as with most products; a gradual even shifting of coloration will occur over time. PVC membranes are generally warranted by the manufacturer and the installer for ten years, and many of the original European in- stallations are still going strong after more than 25 years. The future of PVC membranes in North American pool facilities appears to be bright. The technology is refined and the track record of satisfied users is in place. The next few years may offer PVC- coated stainless steel walls and floors and see PVC increasingly used as a material of choice for new construction as well as renovation. A was installed in 1979 in a day care facility in Oak Brook, Illinois. The Lebanon. Indiana. Parks and Recrea- tion Department installed the next major PVC pool membrane s%-siu t in 1986. Since then there has hccn :t virtual explosion in the number ()I communities installing PVC myna. branes in public pools. The Free - Floating "Shell Within a Shell" Concept ifvou understand 110%% a lcac k%.ird vinyl pool is installed 'Ind %%arks. you understand the genc►al t DI RVI)i of a reinforced PVC 4 -1nunc•rc ial pool renovation ntcntbr.utc pall pct me quickly point (,tit that there• :tie some important dater cnc t.- be- tween a back %-arcl and .t c , nmucrcial renovation ntc•ntbrane• t:�►m- mercial PVC ntctnl1r.ntcI ctrl• three times thicker than .I It, mtco m-ner- grade vin-1 liner I he o un ercial grade s�stcnt� :uc ah�.tc • rcntlorced with a pOI%' •%ter I.tbt a %W11hing or mesh reinforcing tvi nt.tkc theist Or- tualiv indestructible• t,, tearing or shearing. They are imtallcd (A CI_ an adhered slipsheet Ot I I- it) 18- ounce polyester g0 tIUM11c fabric '10 they can expand :and c�nttr.10 with the old pool structure A Typical Installation A typical installation begins with draining, cleaning, and preparing the pool surface to accept the PVC membrane. Workers grind (It 1wn rough edges, fill depressions ()r chipped areas with patch ront- pound, and inspect the pool to un- cover any rotten concrete that might need replacing. Next, they apply :t sanitizing compound over the en- tire surface of the pool to eliminate .fungus and algae growth behind the membrane. They then pin in place crack bridging strips approximately four inches wide and made of stainless or galvanized steel over any work - ing cracks or expansion joints. This protects the membrane from any caulking compounds used and keeps the membrane from being 16rCCd inside a crack, should it ex- pand. A non -woven geotextile fleece padding is next, adliered with an adhesive throughout the pool. This serves as a slipsheet, allowing the petal shell to move under the PVC membrane, and also protects the membrane from any rough spots in the existing pool structure. Workers then carry the rein- forced PVC membrane into the pool and unroll the 75' x 6.5' rolls, over- lapping them approximately even three inches. They fuse the seam with hot air blowers and rollers to melt the two sheets together, appl%- ing the thick blanket of PVC material to the entire area of the pool, includ- ing walls, floor, and gutter areas where appropriate. Next, they attach a PVC - coated stainless steel band, completely around the perimeter of the pool with steel anchors. This stainless steel strip has a sheet of the PVC membrane bonded onto it. The pool membrane material is welded directly to the steel perimeter strip, making a permanent union be- tween the new envelope of PVC lin- ing, the old pool structure, and the pool gutter or deck area: The material is cut away at inlets, main drains, lights, rope anchors or other penetrations. Compression flanges fabricated of 12 -gauge stain- less steel are securely fastened to the old pool structure using stain- less steel bolts and gaskets. This compresses the material to the old wall to prevent leaking. Racing lanes, targets, logos, and pool markings are constructed of the PVC membrane in a black or other offsetting color, then set out and installed with hot air welders to permanently attach the markings to "Because the membrane system is completely scts- pended inside the old shell and does not de- pend on a bond with the old pool, PVC is un- affected by eVan- sion /contraction and freeze /thaw problems like conventional renovation Options: to the new PVC - membrane floor. The installation team then per- forms a series of three seam tests with steel probes to ascertain that there are no open voids at the seams. The new pool renovation is then inspected by the owner, filled, and, after normal pool startup, is ready for use. There Had to Be a Better Way To better understand the scope of the problem confronting pro- fessionals attempting to in- expensively renovate their pools, it might help to gaze out over the cur- rent sea of options. Chart A presents all of the common low -cost pool renovation options available and highlights the primary drawbacks of each. (Stainless steel and aluminum inserts as well as gunite - plaster in- serts aren't covered, because they are much more expensive than the concepts addressed in this article.) When extensive cracks and leaks develop in a pool, pool owners will usually try the patch -and -paint method for as long as their patience s 11tkR/JUI.Y 1990/47 • • SLIDE LENGTH : SLIDE HEIGHT : ZO.ZZ FT. rvoJEc, ~ }►�W /> hit Whilewater West Engineering' r.. si Services Ltd. �L11 �' ��' .+ Rkhmond. O.c..cana[a _ t —1 -0 TIM 1a� w—a t �i . IN:(604) 777.1066 (601) 777 -a516 POOLSIDE SLIDE PS -.945- 140 _"' "W" MRL °E". °i PC 'Va" =1' -0 °"bEC.'89 CRAVANO NO. &w. I.D. I :iv r 1•: ( (, U P A The SCS Model 212 is a complete water play system recommended for entertaining kids from the ages of five through ten years old. The layout of the three platforms leads the children up through a series of water effects with separate control valves at each level. Once at the top they may return to the bottom via the pipe slide or by following the effects back to the beginning. The underside of the highest platform becomes a "grotto" ringed by ater curtains and falls with a reflective panel inside which draws the children into the space. The structure can ily accommodate 40 or more active participants at one time and many more passive observers. I WATER FEATURES 1 15' Central Falls 1 6' Water Curtain 3 - Overhead Chain P 2 - Waterguns 1 - Umbrella Jet 12 - Angle Jets 12- Bar Jets 1 - Pipe Falls 4- Bubbler Jets 16 - Various sprays, hoses and nozzles 6' -0" 18' -0" 6' -0" PLAY FEATURES 1 Pipe or open slide 1 Tire or Pivot Swing 1 - 2' platform 1 4' platform is 1 6' platform 1 Distortion Mirror 1 Rolling Foam Tunnel 0 0 OPTIONAL ACCESSORIES Roller Slide (4 or 6') Cascade Slide (4 or 6') 6' Twister �D Lever Jets Remote Jets Cargo Nets Ring Swings & Jets v 01, SCS Play Systems are built of steel pipe galvanized inside and out with reinforced PVC side panels and finished with chlorine and chemical resistant epoxy mastic. The colors on the structure shown in the above sketch are recommendations only. The finished structure may be painted in the colors of your choice. Patents Pending Primed in Canada 4 @ r� y' REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor and Council Members From: Bob Ko j et in Date: December 14, 1990 Subject: Senior Center Recommendation: Agenda Item # VT T _ B . Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Recommendation to approve the concept and proceed with demolition and construction of Phase I. A of the Edina Senior Center located in the Edina Community Center. As outlined on the plan. Info /Background: It is the intent of the proposal that we work in cooperation with the School District for demolition and construction of the Senior Center. The $45,000 that is recommended for the Capital Improvement of the Senior Center will come from the Capital Fund recommended in the 1991 budget.. We propose to bid mechanical systems, doors and carpet. The demolition will be done by our Public Works crews with the direction of Clark Engler, Engineer and Architect hired by the School District as a Construction Manger for the demolition phase of the project. 23 October 1990 Study for expansion and relocation of the Edina Senior Citizen's Center on the third floor of the Edina Community Center. The existing Senior Citizen's Center is housed in Room 349 which contains approximately 3,140 square feet of floor area. In addition to the main room there are three small offices of approximately 120 square feet each. Therefore the total square footage of the existing Center is approximately 3,500 square feet. The schematic floor plan of the proposed new Senior Citizen's Center as shown on the Drawings dated October 23, 1990 is divided into Area A containing 3,780 square feet, Area B containing 1900 square feet and Area C containing 1,750 square feet for a total of 7,430 square feet. The extent of the proposed remodeling and a rough estimate of the construction cost in each area is as follows: AREA A 1. Demolition A. Remove the south wall of the existing corridor to combine the corridor and existing Rooms 303 -305.. B. Remove existing ceilings and light fixtures in the corridor and in Rooms 303- 305. C. Remove cabinets along the south wall of 303 -305. 2. Mechanical System A. Unit ventilators and radiation along the south wall of 303 -305 will remain in place for heating and ventilation during cold months. Install a new roof top ventilation.- cooling unit and duct work for warm weather months. 3. New Finishes and Equipment A. Floor Finish - carpet and pad B. Ceilings - suspended acoustic tile ceilings and recessed fluorescent lights. C. Walls 1. North - cover existing lockers with furred gypsum board and install new doors and sidelights to the three rooms to the north. Paint the gypsum board. 2. South, East and West - Patch existing plaster and paint all walls. D. Window treatment - install vertical blinds at the south wall. E. Cabinets - install 36' -0" of display and storage cabinets in the Boutique. F. Area Separation = install doors and partitions at the east and west ends to separate Area A from adjacent corridors. 4. Estimated Construction Cost - in the range of $90,000.00 to $100,000.00. AREA B 1. Demolition A. Remove existing ceiling finishes and light fixtures. B. Remove miscellaneous cabinets, window treatment, and unneeded chalk and tackboard. C. Remove resilient floor tile in the Craft Room, under controlled conditions (tile contains asbestos). 2. Mechanical System A. Unit ventilators and radiation along the north wall will remain in place ' for heating and ventilation during cold . months. Install a new roof top ventilation- cooling unit and duct work for warm weather months. B. Install a sink at the west wall of the Craft Room. 3. New Finishes and.Equiipment A. Floor Finishes: 1. Carpet and pad in Billiard and Lecture Rooms. 2. Resilient tile in Craft Room. B. Ceilings - suspended acoustic tile ceilings and recessed fluorescent lights. C. Walls - patch existing plaster and paint all wall surfaces. D. Window Treatment - install vertical blinds at all north wall windows. E. Cabinets - Install 30' -0" of base, upper and tall cabinets. F. Chalk and Tack Board - install a total of 40' -0" of porcelain writing board and chalkboard (410" high) in Aluminum trim. G. Electrical power supply - increase the power supply,in the Craft Room. 4. Estimated Construction Cost - in the range of $50,0.00.00 to $55,000.00. AREA C 1. Demolition A. Remove existing ceiling finishes and light fixtures. B. Remove partitions as necessary to allow for construction of new offices, the reception desk area, and the new entrance to the Conversation Room. 2. Mechanical A. Unit ventilators and radiation along the west wall will remain in place for heating and ventilation during cold months. Install a new roof top ventilation- cooling unit and duct work for warm weather months. B. Install a sink at the north wall of the Conversation Room. 3. New Finishes and Equipment A. Floor Finishes - carpet and pad B. Ceilings - suspended acoustic tile ceilings and recessed fluorescent lights. r c C. Walls 1. Reception and Office Area , a. New walls - steel stud and gypsum board painted b. Existing walls - patch existing plaster - paint 2. Conversation Room a. New door and glass sidelight at north end of east wall. b. All other walls - patch existing plaster and paint. 3. Corridor a. Cover existing lockers with furred gypsum board. Paint. b. Patch existing plaster. Paint. D. Window Treatment - install vertical blinds at windows in the west exterior wall. E. Cabinets and Equipment 1. Reception Area - 12' -0" Reception Desk, 8' -0" of side desk and upper cabinet. 2. Conversation Room - 10' -0" base and upper cabinet at the north wall. 3. Reception Area - lockable passage door and pull down gate. F. Tackboard - a total of 16' -0" of 4' -0" high tackboard in Aluminum frame in the Conversation Room and the Corridor. G. Electrical Power - increase the power supply in the office, reception and conversation areas. 4. Estimated Construction Cost - in the range of $48,000.00 to 53,000.00. Estimated construction costs are based on current wage rates and do not include Architectural and Engineering fees, furnishings or equipment other. than items listed above. Clark W. Engler, Architect 430 Oak Grove Suite 406 Minneapolis, MN 55403 612- 870 -4292 �— - - -- - —T JAC?% ill',i. I .I I � I � L_ -- •- 'C/ONYC�Ci'iG � ,WitIL (iIKiK.'q .L+�:��iA�� "rglti(.S t Gl•ADS 1 C NIX tfi' +y�v1.�AFOf LIc;AI'E•tAta -Whio OTI L 1 SNULI. GO C � O O O O tl Ficbf� PLAN to - � S$NIOR GITtiZ�t�l'S Gtt•1TS� „ 1RG �I.ao�• tDtt'+;, (�MMUN�tY Ct�vtb� GU►R� W. 6N�l,Cii •AK+uitLGj IC• ?3•�9 0 DwAioih a t. MINUTES TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE DECEMBER 11, 1990 9:00 A.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Fran Hoffman, Chairman Gordon Hughes Bob Sherman Craig Swanson MEMBERS ABSENT: Alison Fuhr OTHERS - PRESENT: Mr. Mr. Ms. Ms. Ms. Mr. Ms. Cap Ms. SECTION A VII C. Doug Hostnick, 5401'Abbott Place Brad Hokanson, 5409 Abbott Place Sue Weigle,.Edina Community Center Juanita Peterson, Edina Community Center Linda Sisson,.Edina Community Center Doug Johnson, Edina Schools, Edina Community Center Betsy.Flater, Edina Community Center tain Leonard Kleven, Edina Police Department Joan Waterstreet, Edina Police Department. Requests on which the Committee recommends approval as requested or modified, and the Council's authorization of recommended action. (1) "Request to end West 54th Street at Zenith Avenue and install four -way "STOP" signs at West 54th Street and Abbott Avenue /Place. Continued from November meeting. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Hoffman opened by reviewing the two options as received from Minneapolis with regard to upgrading this area. Their suggestions were to either (1) install east /west "STOP" signs on West 54th Street at Abbott Avenue /Place, or (2) re- position the "STOP" signs at Beard and Drew Avenues at West 54th Street to stop east /west 54th Street traffic to coincide with Minneapolis' patterning. 'Presently these two streets are stopped at West 54th Street for north and southbound traffic. Mr. Hostnick, a resident of Abbott Place and West 54th Street for 22 years, stated that since no accideftt history was found at this location, he felt placement of "STOP" signs was unwarranted. He was concerned with the noise that would develop due to stopping and starting and.he also had observed, especially since the last meeting, that most speed violators were from the immediate neighborhood. He also felt that anyone familiar with the area would know that a prudent person would slow and yield to traffic on West 54th Street. Mr. Brad Hokanson of 5409 Abbott still had safety concerns. He felt that since West 54th Street is uncontrolled, the speed problems still exist. He favored either option in the hopes of slowing traffic on West 54th j n TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE,MINUTES December 11, 1990 Page 2 Street. He was asked by Mr. Hoffman if the school bus stop was on Abbott or West 54th Street and said that the bus presently stopped on Abbott Place. This had been of some concern at the previous meeting. Mr. Swanson was concerned about the second option and removing and replac- ing signs at Beard and Drew. He felt that drivers are so much creatures of habit that he would hate to see the north /south placement of these signs changed to east /west. He suggested a third option of placing 4 -way "STOP" signs at both Beard and Drew. Mr. Hoffman questioned what he felt the warrants might be. Mr. Swanson was'of the opinion that it was warranted by special conditions present. Mr. Hoffman then stated that he sees West 54th Street east of France as a neighborhood collector and, therefore, might not one interruptor be sufficient. Mr. Sherman moved the Edina City Council vass on a resolution to the City of Minneapolis recommending a joint "STOP" sign installation on West 54th Street at Beard Avenue. Additionally. if a requirement exists for neigh- borhood approval in Minneapolis, then that approval be sought by officials_ in Minneapolis. Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0. (2) Request to install a "NO PARKING" sign on Xerxes Avenue, southbound, between West 60th Street at the alley entrance /exit north of 60th Street. Petition received from several local.residents. ACTION TAKEN: As there was no one from the area present, Mr. Hoffman reviewed the names on the petition and discussed the impact on those individuals. He felt that if this sign was placed, the most impacted resident would be Mr. Jarvi at 3100 West 60th Street and his signature was on the petition favoring place- ment. Captain Kleven also stated that there had been a number of accidents at the intersection of Xerxes and West 60th Street and he concurred that visibility is restricted in the area. Mr. Hughes moved to install a "NO PARKING" sign on the west side of Xerxes Avenue between West 60th Street and the alley entrance /exit north of West 60th Street. Mr. Swanson seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0. (3) Request to upgrade the intersection of Southview Lane and the East Frontage Road to a three -way "STOP ". Request received from Ms. Juanita Peterson, Facilities Committee, Edina Community Center, 5701 Normandale Road. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Hoffman began by explaining improvements which are in the planning, stage and will, hopefully, alleviate some of the safety concerns for those who work in the building and their clients. He briefly described potential improvements involving the north parking lot of the Community Center and the impacts as it relates to the request for a multi -way "STOP" VA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES December 11, 1990 Page 3 at Southview Lane and the East Frontage Road. The north parking lot, concept included: a. removal of driveway on Southview Lane b. adding second driveway to East Frontage Road side c. providing walkway from parking lot to above intersection which has a striped crosswalk d. install a chain link or other type of fence to prevent "jay- walking" across.Southview Lane from the north parking lot. These changes are being considered due to the seniors program which is now located in the Community Center. Several representatives of the .Center, to include Ms. Weigle and Ms. Peterson, were very supportive of these efforts. They also believed that a 3 -way "STOP" at the intersection would further safeguard pedestrians that use.the Community Center. The "STOP" sign issue had been discussed some, %years ago prior to the Senior Center and Kingergarten being located in the building. Mr. Swanson asked about volumes on Southview Lane and East Frontage Road. Mr. Hoffman replied that this is an intersection of two collector streets. There are 1500 vehicles per day on Southview and an estimated 2000 per day on the East Frontage Road. Mr. Swanson also asked the representative of.the School District, Mr. Doug Johnson, if any further thought had been given to a bus "pull off" area for',the kindergarten students. Mr. Johnson could not recall why that issue had been tabled, but was in favor of at least trying to initiate discussions again._ Mr. Swanson asked that when the plans for the reconstruction of this area were drawn up, possibly the District could revisit this issue. Mr. Hughes moved to install 'STOP' signs for north and southbound traffic on East Frontage Road at Southview Lane. Mr. Sherman seconded the.motion. Motion carried 4 -0. SECTION B Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request. NONE. SECTION C Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others. NONE. EDINA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE A. 04 e +� 0 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KENNETH ROSLAND Agenda Item # VII. E. From: CRAIG LARSEN Consent Information Only F7 Date: DECEMBER 17, 1990 Mgr. Recommends E To HRA Subject: LAND ACQUISITION ❑ To Council NEAR HIGHWAYS 494 & 169. Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council consider acquisition of a vacant property of approximately 15 acres in the northeast quadrant of I -494 and Highway 169 (old County Road 18). Info/Background The site is bordered on the north by Braemar Park, on the east by Braemar Office Park, and on the west and south by highways 169 and 494. Total area of the site is approximately 14 acres. However, a substantial portion of the site lies within the flood plain of Nine Mile Creek. Approximately seven acres of the site are usable. Reconstruction of the 494/169 interchange will likely take 1.4 acres leaving a net usable area of 5.6 acres. The site is owned and offered for sale by the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) . The land was repossessed by the RTC over a year ago after a default on the original $2,000,000 mortgage. The RTC first offered the property for $1,200,000 and later reduced the price to $800,000. We are told that RTC may accept an offer considerably less than the $800,000 asking price. The property is zoned POD, Planned Office District. The "soft" office market, the large amount of the site in the floodplain, and the poor soils have prevented a sale of the property. w Staff feels the site is potentially useful to the City in a number of ways. 1. Acquisition will protect and preserve valuable floodplain and open.,space areas adjacent to Braemar. 2. The site could be used for temporary storage and recycling site for concrete and asphalt resulting from City street projects. All City projects currently require that contractors remove these materials from the City. The site would provide an area to process the waste materials which would then be reused'in the construction of.new streets, etc. The Public Works Department estimates this could save between $20,000 and $40,000 annually. 3. The site could also be used as a compost site for leaves collected from City streets and properties. 4. Currently, we must dispose of tree trunks and stumps at remote dump sites. Last year we hauled 35 truckloads to a dump near Hanover. Dumping costs averaged. $75.00 per load. There is also a significant cost related to man hours and equipment. Acquisition of this site' could eliminate many of these costs. . As mentioned earlier we expect. the site could be acquired for substantially less than the $800,000 asking price. We believe they would accept $400,000 and may accept less. We would suggest an initial offer in the $250,000 to $300,000 range. " mobR OR TENNIS COURTS SALLPARK BRAEMAR PARK 0 GOLF z DOME AND PICNIC HE CLUBmOUSE AREA SOCCER COURSES GOLF FIELD ARE a G PAVI ION TRAIL I AND PIS Aple I. -ROANG 179 a not I. 1 NORTH I I 1'-100' USAkLE AREA ABOVE ELEV. 834 Q 5.6 ACRES I P1;. KIP. i . ,,,,, ANTICIPATED 494 TAK I N� LINE CONTA I NS 1.40 ACRES I 494 FgON T4 Gc W. B. L. 494 . 14.71 ACRES NEQ I -494 AND U.S. 169 EDINA, MINNESOTA . PURCHASE PRICE: $800,000 TERMS: Cash TYPE OF PROPERTY: Vacant Land ADDRESS: 8100 West 78th Street Edina, Minnesota LOCATION: Northeast Quadrant of I -494 and U.S. Highway 169. LAND SIZE: 640,578 sq.ft. (14.71 acres) ZONING: POD -1 (Planned Office District) STREET FRONTAGE: West 78th Street - 1,250 ft. U.S. Hwy 169 -168.23 ft. TRAFFIC COUNTS: On I -494 east of 169 - 78,500 cars /day (MNDOT - 1988) On I -494 west of 169 - 61,500 cars /day On 169 north of I -494- 35,000 cars /day PID$: 18- 116 -21 -21 -0008 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 1, Braewood Park, except the easterly 175 feet thereof, Edina, Minnesota. ASSESSOR'S ESTIMATE MARKET VALUE: $1,200,000 (FOR TAXES PAYABLE 1989) REAL ESTATE TAXES: $60,056.64 (PAYABLE 1989) SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS: $12,164.2.0 TOTAL DUE 1989: $72,220.84 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS BALANCE REMAINING: $56,977.07 %13A. Q �+ .:V. � J �� �o Rpaw- see REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: CEIL SMITH via KENNETH ROSLAND Date: DECEMBER 3, 1990 Subject: 1991 POLICE TEAMSTERS CONTRACT Recommendation: Info /Background: Agenda Item # - VII. F. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends To HRA n To Council Action Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion The following economic issues have been tentatively agreed upon, subject to the City Council's approval. 1. Wages for 1991 - 4% increase 2. Employer's Insurance Contribution - $210.00 /month. (This is an increase of $20.00 /month). These increases are consistent with the budgeted amounts proposed in the 1991 Budget, currently under consideration. A. o e ` :' 71 Wd 0 �� •'�bRlOM��O/ lase RERORTIRECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & Council Members From: Susan Wohlrabe Date: December 17, 1990 Subject: 13TH ANNUAL VOLUNTEER RECEPTION Recommendation: Agenda Item # VII. G. Consent FTJ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion That Tuesday, April 23, 1991, be approved as the date for the 13th Annual Volunteer Reception. Because of the increasing number of attendees over the last few years, it will be held for the first time at Edinborough in 1991. There is no Council Meeting scheduled for the week of April 23rd. Info /Background: Jf "V A. o� e O \N�APOMtbO� i9xe REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # VII.H From: Francis Hoffman Consent ❑ City Engineer Information Only • ❑ Date: December 17, 1990 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Release of Construction El To Council Easement Lot 1, Block 2 Action 0 Motion Oscar Roberts First Addition ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Authorize Mayor & Manager to sign Quit Claim Deed for release of construction easement Info /Background: This is a construction easement obtained in 1957 for sanitary sewer construction. The easement terminated upon completion of construction. However, the title company 'requests clarification of date on the easement since none existed. As such, a quit claim deed would suffice to clear up the issue and staff would so recommend. �1 I Q J W Z i it ,m-51 K oft E. V t I • -10 Zb - 4 - - t a+ 41 12 : b 9 13 8 14 7 15 6O 16 5 17 4 is- 3 s 19 2 � �20 ~ :1; ' -li r>< GO- �'L n �1 .f 1 IZ 31 . ' 129 `i1 1 b M IR 24 M , 30 3L 36 3 ., .. : 12477 0 1 W. 11i1•. Sixnlf ` i t „% 27 W 2 2 ', � 2 2'S 29 32,E f .i � 1�� -•`.f __ �i 124 � � a� 117.70 I :a � � �� ab -- -� 141 1 6 '` 3 +UP�1ix `a, �f .r� .a _ r 3 24 V2>�` yam,.° + 33 `�� ►� 34 �!i4 3 3 • ' w Nis'd5W o 30 1b' 25 `O. + 34 44 1 a e•3yfst" •:i . a,i�M ILA:63s2. 111.77 Z 1 40 IN 135 • - -- 23 '� -- 27 , i 11►111ti! t" �i>R � • �° 4 o Its Its MW4+! W 24 " 5 1254 M"VIi W Ntr46'IIVW ISO urww 133 iti 6 $ 5 b a 22 9 IVE o W R r RC g ` 6 21 > Nt9's' ae 45 u 90 1 C .25 46 a Az I 7 20 2 7 ti 24 19.1 r o 2 e I a N 3 .$ e East 3 9 18 T. >= 9 1�.� ZIM 10 17 last a 5s $ 10 F � i II 16 • 2 Ata .. 11 v 21 0 ust BO $ Z 6.: 12 _ 13 - - e 12 0 129 126 1Sp 32 a 33 = 7 1 't5 "W .6 ^ Nt» 45w Y 13 14 20 $ 1 M" -- a 47 09 9e - 9 too m ; +�, 19 - - 14 2 1 1:4, -16 17y � • ro - Y 47%. -60 R6 6214Z 446 r MAVELLE-3 9 !2 I Its io fo � 2 16 1 iQ4 �- N Q 3 15 7 2 �oq9 4 o F. 14 3 'F r 6 w W 3 O W. s Q 13 4 df 04P 5 lb 4- 6 12 ' .S t M . 3 7 II 6 .6 {+ 10 7 s t tr! • e4 3 �O 1 ♦' 4 }� 40 IJ� -li r>< GO- �'L n �1 .f 1 IZ 31 . ' 129 `i1 1 b M IR 24 M , 30 3L 36 3 ., .. : 12477 0 1 W. 11i1•. Sixnlf ` i t „% 27 W 2 2 ', � 2 2'S 29 32,E f .i � 1�� -•`.f __ �i 124 � � a� 117.70 I :a � � �� ab -- -� 141 1 6 '` 3 +UP�1ix `a, �f .r� .a _ r 3 24 V2>�` yam,.° + 33 `�� ►� 34 �!i4 3 3 • ' w Nis'd5W o 30 1b' 25 `O. + 34 44 1 a e•3yfst" •:i . a,i�M ILA:63s2. 111.77 Z 1 40 IN 135 • - -- 23 '� -- 27 , i 11►111ti! t" �i>R � • �° 4 o Its Its MW4+! W 24 " 5 1254 M"VIi W Ntr46'IIVW ISO urww 133 iti 6 $ 5 b a 22 9 IVE o W R r RC g ` 6 21 > Nt9's' ae 45 u 90 1 C .25 46 a Az I 7 20 2 7 ti 24 19.1 r o 2 e I a N 3 .$ e East 3 9 18 T. >= 9 1�.� ZIM 10 17 last a 5s $ 10 F � i II 16 • 2 Ata .. 11 v 21 0 ust BO $ Z 6.: 12 _ 13 - - e 12 0 129 126 1Sp 32 a 33 = 7 1 't5 "W .6 ^ Nt» 45w Y 13 14 20 $ 1 M" -- a 47 09 9e - 9 too m ; +�, 19 - - 14 2 1 1:4, -16 17y � • ro - Y 47%. -60 R6 6214Z 446 r Ilk Ai ne REPORT /RECOMMENDATION \�bRepeBTMt // To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER Agenda Item # VIII.A.B.0 From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Consent EZ Information Only ❑ Date: DECEMBER 14, 1990 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: RESOLUTIONS DESIG14ATING 0 To Council DIRECTOR /ALTERNATE OF SRA AND LOGIS AND Action ❑ Motion OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER !❑ Resolution ! Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adoption of Resolutions designating director /alternate of SRA and LOGIS and official newpaper for 1991. Info /Background Attached are copies of resolutions which the Council should approve at this time of year for 1991. There have been no changes from the previous year. 0 RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DIRECTOR AND ALTERNATE DIRECTOR TO SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: John C. Wallin is hereby designated to serve as a Director of the Suburban Rate Authority, and Eric R. Anderson is hereby designated to serve as Alternate Director of the Suburban Rate Authority for the year 1991 and until their successors are appointed. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I,_ the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 17, 1990 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 18th day of December 1990. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk J r RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DIRECTOR - AND ALTERNATE DIRECTOR TO LOGIS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: .John C. Wallin is hereby designated as a Director of LOGIS and Kenneth E. Rosland is hereby designated'as Alternate Director of LOGIS for the year 1991 and until their successors are appointed. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is- a-true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 17, 1990 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 18th day of December 1990. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk RESOLUTION DESIGNATING OFFICIAL NEVSPAPER o BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the Edina Sun - Current be and is hereby designated as the Official Newspaper for the.City of Edina for the year 1991. C STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct . copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular - Meeting of December 17, 1990 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 18th day of December 1990. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk I RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DIRECTOR AND ALTERNATE DIRECTOR TO SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: John C. Wallin is hereby designated to serve as a Director of the Suburban Rate Authority, and Eric R. Anderson is hereby designated to serve as Alternate Director of the Suburban Rate Authority for the year 1991 and until their successors are appointed. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 17, 1990 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 18th day of December 1990. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk - RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DIRECTOR AND ALTERNATE DIRECTOR TO LOGIS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: John C. Wallin is hereby designated as a Director of LOGIS and Kenneth E. Rosland is hereby designated as Alternate Director of LOGIS for the year 1991 and until their successors are appointed. 0 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 17, 1990 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 18th day of December 1990 i Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk RESOLUTION DESIGNATING.OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the Edina Sun - Current be and is hereby designated as the Official Newspaper for the City of Edina for the year 1991. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its'Regular- Meeting of December 17, 1990 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 18th day of December 1990. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk o O •'�RIOM•yO • Bee REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & Council Members From: Susan Wohlrabe Date: December 17, 1990 Subject: COUNCIL DINNER MEETING DATE CHANGE Agenda Item # x- - Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Due to a conflict, that the Council's Annual Dinner Meeting of Boards and Commissions which was approved for Tuesday, March 12, 1991, be changed to Tuesday, March 19, 1991. This event will be held at the Braemar Clubhouse. Info /Background: Y 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -30 -90 PAGE 1 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO: INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 304M98 12/07/90 178.69 MINNEGASCO GAS 10- 4254- 440 -44 MANUAL 304M98 12/07/90 171.11 MINNEGASCO GAS 10- 4254 - 520 -52 MANUAL 304M98 12/07/90 911.58 MINNEGASCO GAS 10- 4254 - 540 -54 MANUAL 304M98 12/07/90 266.55 MINNEGASCO GAS 10- 4254 - 646 -64 MANUAL. 304M98 12/07/90 72.30 MINNEGASCO GAS 23- 4254- 612 -61 MANUAL 304M98 12/07/90 2.10 MINNEGASCO GAS 26- 4254 - 682 -68 MANUAL 304M98 12/07/90 307.52 MINNEGASCO GAS 27- 4254 - 662 -66 MANUAL 304M98 12/07/90 31.70 MINNEGASCO GAS 27- 4254 - 664 -66 MANUAL;.: 304M98 12/07/90 139.30 MINNEGASCO GAS 27- 4254 - 667 -66 MANUAL 304M98 12/07/90 1,489.37 MINNEGASCO GAS 28- 4254 - 702 -70 MANUAL 304M98 12/07/90 1,289.63 MINNEGASCO GAS 30- 4254 - 782 -78 MANUAL 304M98 12/07/90 64.49 MINNEGASCO GAS 40- 4254- 801 -80 MANUAL 304M98 12/07/90 1,155.71 MINNEGASCO GAS 40- 4254 - 803 -80 MANUAL 304M98 12/07/90 60.51 MINNEGASCO GAS 50- 4254 - 841 -84 MANUAL 304M98 12/07/90 57.08 MINNEGASCO GAS 50- 4254- 861 -86 MANUAL 6,197.64 * * * * ** * ** -CKS' 305700 12/10/90 20.00 UBC PLAN REVIEW 10- 4901 - 490 -49 MANUAL 20.00 * * * * ** 305P32 12/10/90 26,333.07 P.E.R.A. PERA 10- 4145 - 510 -51 MANUAL 26,333.07 * * * *** * ** -CKS 306A82 12/10/90 54.22 AT &T TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 510 -51 MANUAL 306A82 12/10/90 5.19 AT &T TELEPHONE 27- 4256 - 664 -,66 MANUAL "> 306A82 12/10/90 9.06 AT &T TELEPHONE 27- 4256- 667 -66 MANUAL 306A82 12/10/90 1.15 AT &T TELEPHONE 50- 4256 - 821 -82 MANUAL 69.62 306A83 12/10/90 79.00 AT &T TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 510 -51 MANUAL 79.00 306A84 12/10/90 16.95 AT &T TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 6212 -62 MANUAL 306A84 12/10/90 16.95- M TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 622 -62 MANUAL 306A84 12/10/90 16.95 M TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 622 -62 MANUAL 16.95 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 306U27 12/10/90 54.02 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 436 -42 MANUAL 306U27 12/10/90 2,128.78 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL 306U27 12/10/90 150.93 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 622 -62 MANUAL. 306U27 12/10/90 103.46 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 628 -62 MANUAL 306U27 12/10/90 31.93 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 646 -64 MANUAL 306U27 12/10/90 152.47 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 23- 4256 - 612 -61 MANUAL 306U27 12/10/90 23.75 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 26- 4256- 682 -68 MANUAL 306U27 12/10/90 50.68 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 30- 4256 - 782 -78 MANUAL 306U27 12/10/90 56.88 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 40- 4256 - 801 -80 MANUAL 306U27 12/10/90 49.33 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 40- 4256- 803 -80 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 306027 12/10/90 160.19 306U27 12/10/90 165.18 3,127.60 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR US WEST COMM US WEST COMM * * * * ** 310723 12/10/90 127.10 S ANDERSON 127.10 * * * * ** 310E11 12/10/90 5.17- EAGLE WINE 310EII 12/10/90 3.66- EAGLE WINE 310EII 12/10/90 7.36- EAGLE WINE 310E11 12/10/90 1.10- EAGLE WINE 310E11 12/10/90 517.32 EAGLE WINE 310E11 12/10/90 365.82 EAGLE WINE 310E11 12/10/90 735.71 EAGLE WINE 310E11 12/10/90 110.15 EAGLE WINE 310EII 12/07/90 19.65 EAGLE WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 1,731.36 MIX * * * * ** MANUAL 310E26 12/10/90 9.18- ED PHILLIPS 310E26 12/10/90 39.79- ED PHILLIPS 31OE26 12/10/90 5.62 ED PHILLIPS 310E26 12/10/90 5.62- ED PHILLIPS 31OE26 12/10/90 5.62- ED PHILLIPS 310E26 12/10/90 13.55- ED PHILLIPS 31OE26 12/10/90 17.40- ED PHILLIPS 310E26 12/10/90 459.27 ED PHILLIPS 31OE26 12/10/90 1,989.63 ED PHILLIPS 31OE26 12/10/90 281.30 ED PHILLIPS 31OE26 12/10/90 281.30- ED PHILLIPS 31OE26 12/10/90 281.33 ED PHILLIPS 31OE26 12/10/90 870.24 ED PHILLIPS 31OE26 12/10/90 677.50 ED PHILLIPS 310E26 12/10/90 499.65 ED PHILLIPS 310E26 12/10/90 578.70 ED PHILLIPS 310E26 12/10/90 530.95 ED PHILLIPS 31OE26 12/10/90 211.49 ED PHILLIPS 310E26 12/10/90 29.00 ED PHILLIPS 31OE26 12/10/90 517.00 ED PHILLIPS 310E26 12/10/90 190.95 ED PHILLIPS 31OE26 12/10/90 335.00 ED PHILLIPS 31OE26 12/10/90 564.20 ED PHILLIPS 31OE26 12/10/90 692.75 ED PHILLIPS 310E26 12/07/90 57.50 ED PHILLIPS 8,399.62 310G82 12/10/90 41.00- GRIGGS COOPER 31OG82 12/10/90 16.69- GRIGGS COOPER 1130 -90 PAGE 2 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. # MESSAGE. TELEPHONE 50- 4256- 821 -82 MANUAL TELEPHONE 50- 4256 - 841 -84 MANUAL * ** -CKS BANKER BOXES 10- 4504 - 180 -18 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL: 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL;, 50-4628-862-86 MANUAL:` 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL MIX 50- 4632 - 822 -82 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL,.; 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL` 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL'!: 50- 4626 - 822 =82 MANUAL' 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL. 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50-4628- 822 -82 MANUAL, 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL: 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL.;'. 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL'' 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL. MIX 50 -4632- 842 -84 MANUAL, * ** -CKS 50- 3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -30 -90 PAGE 3 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 31OG82 12/10/90 48.39- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL 31OG82 12/10/90 2.32- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL 31OG82 12/10/90 21.86- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 310G82 12/10/90 74.18- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL. 31OG82 12/10/90 177.94- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 31OG82 12/10/90 8.78- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 31OG82 12/10/90 141.05- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 31OG82 12/10/90 3,709.02 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626-822 -82 MANUAL 310G82 12/10/90 8,897.07 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 31OG82 12/10/90 438.87 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 310682 12/10/90 7,052.66 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 31OG82 12/10/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 31OG82 12/10/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 31OG82 12/10/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 31OG82 12/10/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 31OG82 12/10/90 11.42- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 31OG82 12/10/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 19,553.99 31OH83 12/10/90 60,000.00 HRA TRANSFER 10- 1145 - 000 -00 MANUAL 60,000.00 * * * * ** * * * -CKS 31OJ62 12/10/90 3.01- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 31OJ62 12/10/90 2.25- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 31OJ62 12/10/90 29.50- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 31OJ62 12/10/90 3.85- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 31OJ62 12/10/90 11.19- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 31OJ62 12/10/90 97.99- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL .. 31OJ62 12/10/90 3.10- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -,84 MANUAL 31OJ62 12/10/90 8.12- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 31OJ62 12/10/90 1.24- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 31OJ62 12/10/90 42.82- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 31OJ62 12/10/90 8.22- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 3-10J62 12/10/90 10.62 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 31OJ62 12/10/90 1,475.48 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 31OJ62 12/10/90 34.81 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 31OJ62 12/10/90 4,898.85 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 31OJ62 12/10/90 2,141.42 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 31OJ62 12/10/90 15.05 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 31OJ62 12/10/90 12.43- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 31OJ62 12/10/90 59.28- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 31OJ62 12/10/90 11.21 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL. 31OJ62 12/10/90 3.54 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL ' °` 31DJ62 12/10/90 225.49 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 31OJ62 12/10/90 381.81 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 31OJ62 12/10/90 301.20 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 31OJ62 12/10/90 3.54 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL` 31OJ62 12/10/90 31.86 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 31OJ62 12/10/90 4.13 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 31OJ62 12/10/90 1,116.27 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 31OJ62 12/10/90 310.31 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 31OJ62 12/10/90 1.77 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 31OJ62 12/10/90 812.43 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -30 -90 PAGE 4 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 310J62 12/10/90 10.62 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 310J62 12/10/90 123.80 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 310J62 12/10/90 9.99- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL.__..... 310J62 12/10/90 23.60 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL ' " 310J62 12/10/90 818.63 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 12,463.45 *.�* *.�- CKS::<::. 310N16 12/07/90 25.07 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 301 -30 MANUAL ' :' 310N16 12/07/90 20,952.62 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 321 -30 MANUAL 310N16 12/07/90 3,500.47 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 322 -30 MANUAL.,.., . 310N16 12/07/90 2,911.86 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252- 330 -30 MANUAL ;: , 310N16 12/07/90 2,073.37 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252- 375 -30 MANUAL 310N16 12/07/90 527.92 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 440 -44 MANUAL 310N16 12/07/90 47.18 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 460 -46 MANUAL 310N16 12/07/90 1,300.21 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 520 -52 MANUAL 310N16 12/07/90 1,953.40 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 540 -54 ' -MANUAL;; 310N16 12/07/90 4,300.06 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 646 -64 MANUAL 310N16 12/07/90 507.62 NSP POWER /LIGHT 23- 4252 - 612 -61 MANUAL 310N16 12/07/90 89.78 NSP POWER /LIGHT 26- 4252 - 682 -68 MANUAL,- ,.;,:,, 310N16 12/07/90 2,012.25 NSP POWER /LIGHT 27- 4252- 662 -66 MANUAL 310N16 12/07/90 191.58 NSP POWER /LIGHT 27- 4252 - 864 -66 MANUAL 310N16 12/07/90 724.95 NSP POWER /LIGHT 27- 4252 - 667 -66 MANUAL 310N16 12/07/90 8,557.69 NSP POWER /LIGHT 28- 4252 - 702 -70 MANUAL 310N16 12/07/90 8,559.69- NSP POWER /LIGHT 28- 4252- 702 -70 MANUAL..:_. 310N16 12/07/90 8,559.69 NSP POWER /LIGHT 28- 4252 - 702 -70 MANUAL; 310N16 12/07/90 263.82 NSP POWER /LIGHT 29- 4252- 722 -72 MANUAL 310N16 12/07/90 6,368.96 NSP POWER /LIGHT 30- 4252- 782 -78 MANUAL 310N16 12/07/90 42.36 NSP POWER /LIGHT 30- 4252 - 782 -78 MANUAL.:.:..,: 310N16 12/07/90 42.36- NSP POWER /LIGHT 30- 4252- 783 -78 MANUAL ;. : 310N16 12/07/90 42.36 NSP POWER /LIGHT 30- 4252 - 783 =78 MANUAL....: 310N16 12/07/90 1,799.88 NSP POWER /LIGHT 40- 4252 - 801 -80 MANUAL 310N16 12/07/90 23,130.31 NSP POWER /LIGHT 40- 4252 - 803 -80 MANUAL 310N16 12/07/90 208.05 NSP POWER /LIGHT 41- 4252 - 902 -90 MANUAL:: 310N16 12/07/90 107.91 NSP POWER /LIGHT 41 -4252- 902 -90 MANUAL , 310N16 12/07/90 510.85 NSP POWER /LIGHT 50- 4252- 821 -82 MANUAL 310N16 12/07/90 883.62 NSP POWER /LIGHT 50- 4252 - 841 -84 MANUAL 310N16 12/07/90 479.96 NSP POWER /LIGHT 50- 4252 - 861 -86 MANUAL..,,,.,, 83,471.75 310P82 12/10/90 2.41- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL :. 310P82 12/10/90 5.55- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL ' 310P82 12/10/90 5.36- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 310P82 12/10/90 240.98 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 310P82 12/10/90 554.57 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 310P82 12/10/90 536.35 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL."::: 310P82 12/07/90 36.58 PRIOR WINE MIX 50 -4632- 822 -82 MANUAL 1,355.16 310Q16 12/10/90 31.18- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -30 -90 PAGE 5 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P.O. • MESSAGE 31OQ16 12/10/90 7.21- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 31OQ16 12/10/90 86.72- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 31OQ16 12/10/90 1.24 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 31OQ16 12110190 9.13- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 31OQ16 12/10/90 46.36- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL'... 31OQ16 12/10/90 6.72- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 31OQ16 12/10/90 3.33- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 310Q16 12/10/90 1.17- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 310Q16 12/10/90 3.75- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 31OQ16 12/10/90 1557.65 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 31OQ16 12/10/90 62.24- QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 31OQ16 12/10/90 4,334.95 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 310Q16 12/10/90 166.27 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL :" <>` 31OQ16 12/10/90 2,317.80 QUALITY WINE 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 31OQ16 12/10/90 720.70 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 31OQ16 12/10/90 911.85 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 310Q16 12/10/90 374.75 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL >;< 310016 12/10/90 116.85 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL'..:;: 310Q16 12/10/90 638.65 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 31OQ16 12/07/90 30.75 QUALITY WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 862 -86 MANUAL 10,913.65 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 313C33 12/10/90 165,000.00 CITY /EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 313C33 12/10/90 165,000.00- CITY /EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL .00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 313F14 12/10/90 14,833.00 FIDELITY BANK FICA 10- 4149 - 510 -51 MANUAL`'' 313F14 12/10/90 655.02 FIDELITY BANK MEDICARE 10- 4162 - 510 =51 MANUAL 15,488.02 313P36 12/07/90 15.00 PETTY CASH GARDEN PROGRAM 10- 4201- 643 -64 MANUAL 313P36 12/07/90 17.50 PETTY CASH MTG EXP 10- 4206 - 140 -14 MANUAL 313P36 12/07/90 53.27 PETTY CASH MTG EXP 10- 4206 - 200 -20 MANUAL... 313P36 12/07/90 48.10 PETTY CASH POSTAGE 10- 4290 - 510 -51 MANUAL'' 313P36 12/07/90 19.55 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES /P &R 10- 4502- 600 -60 MANUAL 313P36 12/07/90 19.41 PETTY CASH ARNESON OPENING 10- 4504- 627 -62 MANUAL 313P36 12/07/90 12.72 PETTY CASH PHOTO DEVELOP 10- 4508 - 120 -12 MANUAL 313P36 12/07/90 14.69 PETTY CASH MEETING 30- 4516 - 781 -78 MANUAL 200.24 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 317632 12/10/90 351.55 BELLBOY CORP 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL:::: 317632 12/10/90 351.55 BELLBOY CORP 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 317632 12/10/90 351.55 BELLBOY CORP 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 1,054.65 * * * * ** *.*- CKS,. :',, 317EII 12/10/90 .70- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -30 -90 PAGE 6 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE> 317EII 12/10/90 5.12- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 317E11 12/10/90 .70- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 317E11 12/10/90 3.28- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL,.__;, 317EII 12/10/90 7.76- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL; 317E11 12/10/90 10.94- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL '. 317E11 12/10/90 70.00 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 317EII 12/10/90 511.96 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 317E11 12/10/90 328.28 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL_ >: 317E11 12/10/90 69.60 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 317E11 12/10/90 776.25 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 317E11 12/10/90 1,093.58 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628-862 -86 MANUAL 2,821.17 * * * * ** * * * -CKS 317E26 12/10/90 3.47- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 317E26 12/10/90 1.32- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL •: 317E26 12/10/90 6.17- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL .; 317E26 12/10/90 1.46- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 317E26 12/10/90 1.49- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 317E26 12/10/90 20.60- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL,,,,.,,,. 317E26 12/10/90 1.56- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL' 317E26 12/10/90 173.58 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 317E26 12/10/90 66.10 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 317E26 12/10/90 308.63 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 317E26 12/10/90 74.69 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL..;: 317E26 12/10/90 73.16 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL " :. :: 317E26 12/10/90 78.42 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 317E26 12/10/90 1,030.11 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 317E26 12/10/90 381.15 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL..,,,,,, 317E26 12/10/90 655.35 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 317E26 12/10/90 189.00 ED PHILLIPS 50-4628 - 822 =82 MANUAL 317E26 12/10/90 80.40 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 317E26 12/10/90 496.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 317E26 12/10/90 1,143.15 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 317E26 12/10/90 1,291.80 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL' - -'=:' 317E26 12/10/90 395.35 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 317E26 12/10/90 49.50 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 317E26 12/10/90 603.75 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL...... 317E26 12/10/90 947.15 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628-862-86 MANUAL 317E26 12/10/90 1,227.80 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 317E26 12/07/90 35.10 ED PHILLIPS BEER 50- 4630 - 822 -82 MANUAL 317E26 12/07/90 75.75 ED PHILLIPS BEER 50- 4630 - 842 -84 MANUAL 317E26 12/07/90 30.30 ED PHILLIPS BEER 50- 4630- 862 -86 MANUAL:; 317E26 12/07/90 75:00 ED PHILLIPS MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 MANUAL 9,445.17 * * * * ** * * * -CKS 317G82 12/10/90 53.40- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 842 -84 'MANUAL'''' "'" 317G82 12/10/90 19.36- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 317G82 12/10/90 46.21- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 317G82 12/10/90 40.26- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL >: 317G82 12/10/90 50.20- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL' 317G82 12/10/90 109.09- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -30 -90 PAGE 7 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 317G82 12/10/90 6.54— GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 317G82 12/10/90 2,013.20 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 317G82 12/10/90 2,509.87 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 317G82 12/10/90 51454.50 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 317G82 12/10/90 327.12 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 317G82 12/10/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 317G82 12/10/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 317G82 12/10/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 9,979.63 * * * * ** * ** —CKS 317J62 12/10/90 42.56— JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL: 317J62 12/10/90 7.19— JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 317J62 12/10/90 2.21— JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 317J62 12/10/90 .87— JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710-822 -82 MANUAL 317J62 12/10/90 6.47— JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 317J62 12/10/90 10.04— JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL: ' 317J62 12/10/90 1.11— JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 317J62 12/10/90 49.92— JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 317J62 12/10/90 108.91— JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 317J62 12/10/90 11.07— JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 ....... MANUAL:`." 317J62 12/10/90 6.16— JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 317J62 12/10/90 721.62 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 317J62 12/10/90 10.62 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 317J62 12/10/90 2,127.32 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL. 317J62 12/10/90 12.40 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 317J62 12/10/90 15.35 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 317J62 12/10/90 2,496.31 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 317J62 12/10/90 5,446.95 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 317J62 12/10/90 34.67 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 317J62 12/10/90 2.95 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822=82 MANUAL 317J62 12/10/90 10.72— JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 317J62 12/10/90 6.49 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 317J62 12/10/90 86.50 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL. 317J62 12/10/90 220.67 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 317J62 12/10/90 12.98 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 317J62 12/10/90 1,004.55 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 317J62 12/10/90 643.41 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 317J62 12/10/90 20.06 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 317J62 12/10/90 111.10 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 317J62 12/10/90 19.47 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 317J62 12/10/90 1,106.16 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 317J62 12/10/90 12.39 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL <::o: 317J62 12/10/90 615.69 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 14,470.43 * * * * ** * ** —CKS 317P20 12/10/90 11.00— PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 317P20 12/10/90 5.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 317P20 12/10/90 190.30 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 317P20 12/10/90 .00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 317P20 12/10/90 162.45 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 317P20 12/10/90 4.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -30 -90 PAGE 8 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. #MESSAGE 350.75 " 317P82 12/10/90 4.16- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL'' 317P82 12/10/90 7.66- PRIOR WINE 50= 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 317P82 12/10/90 9.26- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 317P82 12/10/90 416.15 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL;: 317P82 12/10/90 766.46 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL' 317P82 12/10/90 926.43 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 317P82 12/07/90 65.93 PRIOR WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 822 -82 MANUAL 317P82 12/07/90 124.37 PRIOR WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 MANUAL.-, 2,278.26 * * * -CKS 317Q16 12/10/90 32.30- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL;; 317016 12/10/90 7.06- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL:; 317Q16 12/10/90 10.58- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 317Q16 12/10/90 .20 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 317Q16 12/10/90 1.92- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL... 317Q16 12/10/90 10.96- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL,;.:.. 317Q16 12/10/90 26.13- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 317016 12/10/90 61.51- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 317Q16 12/10/90 13.03- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 317Q16 12/10/90 .39- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL; 317Q16 12/10/90 1,614.27 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL' 317016 12/10/90 9.84- QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 317Q16 12/10/90 1,307.02 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 317Q16 12/10/90 3,075.17 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL.......:; 317Q16 12/10/90 1,056.70 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -,82 MANUAL;'. 317Q16 12/10/90 705.55 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822-82 MANUAL 317Q16 12/10/90 1,093.45 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 317Q16 12/10/90 191.85 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 317Q16 12/10/90 1,297:84 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL:; 317Q16 12/10/90 38.95 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 10,207.28 " * * * * ** - CK.S__.... 317T22 12/10/90 135.00 THE WINE COMPANY 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL. 135.00 " * * * * ** * * *- GKS.._ 317W89 12/07/90 242.00 WORLD CLASS WINE BEER 50- 4630 - 862 -86 MANUAL 242.00 318A82 12/10/90 .60 AT &T TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL 318A82 12/10/90 8.75 AT &T TELEPHONE 23- 4256- 612 -61 MANUAL 318A82 12/10/90 .90 AT &T TELEPHONE 50- 4256 - 861 -86 MANUAL 10.25 318A83 12/10/90 18.17 AT &T TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE R RRRRx 318H83 12/10/90 R R R R R R 318027 12/10/90 318U27 12/10/90 318U27 12/10/90 318027 12/10/90 318U27 12/10/90 318U27 12/10/90 318U27 12/10/90 318U27 12/10/90 318U27 12/10/90 318U27 12/10/90 318U27 12/10/90 318U27 12/10/90 318U27 12/10/90 318U27 12/10/90 x x x x R x MANUAL 320700 12/10/90 xRxRRR MANUAL 320A31 12/10/90 320A31 12/10/90 320A31 12/10/90 320A31 12/10/90 x R R R R R 320 ;14 12/10/90 xRRxxx 320P32 12/10/90 xxxxxx 320P70 12/10/90 R RRRRR 324C47 12/10/90 AMOUNT 18.17 * 32,000.00 32,000.00 * 17.92 1,456.57 247.55 23.68 94.10 16.06 385.80 257.16 43.44 28.44 593.42 16.06 16.06 165.05 3,361.31 * 512.00 512.00 * 347.94 39.00 19.50 97.50 503.94 * 116.20 116.20 * 31,110.98 31,110.98 * 5,000.00 5,000.00 * 826.20 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION HRA US WEST COMM US WEST COMM US WEST COMM US WEST COMM US WEST COMM US WEST COMM US WEST COMM US WEST COMM US WEST COMM US WEST COMM US WEST COMM US WEST COMM US WEST COMM US WEST COMM LOTHERT /ASSO AIRSIGNAL AIRSIGNAL AIRSIGNAL AIRSIGNAL FIDELITY BANK P.E.R.A. POSTMASTER COMM LIFE INS HRA TRANSFER TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE SERVICES PAGER SERVICE PAGER SERVICE PAGER SERVICE PAGER SERVICE MEDICARE PERA POSTAGE LIFE INSURANCE 11 -30 -90 PAGE 9 ACCOUNT NO. INV. 8 P.O. 8 MESSAGE 10- 1145 - 000 -00 MANUAL - CKS. : : :. ". 10- 4256- 436 -42 MANUAL 10- 4256- 510 -51 MANUAL 10- 4256 - 622 -62 MANUAL 10- 4256- 628 -62 MANUAL 10- 4256- 646 -64 MANUAL 23- 4256- 612 -61 MANUAL 27- 4256 - 662 -66 MANUAL 28- 4256 - 702 -70 MANUAL 29- 4256 - 722 -72 MANUAL 40- 4256 - 801 -80 MANUAL 40- 4256- 803 -80 MANUAL 50- 4256 - 821 -82 MANUAL 50- 4256- 841 -84 MANUAL 50- 4256 - 861 -86 MANUAL RRR -CKS. z 10- 4901 - 490 -49 MANUAL RRR— CKS':. 10- 4226 - 420 -42 MANUAL 10- 4248 - 540 -54 MANUAL 12- 4248 - 434 -43 MANUAL.;a. 40- 4248 - 801 -80 MANUAL * ** —CKS .... 10- 4162 - 510 -51 MANUAL CKS :_:: 10- 4145 - 510 -51 MANUAL ** *- CKS.," 10- 4290 - 510 -51 MANUAL RRR -CKS:. 10- 4157- 510 -51 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -30 -90 PAGE CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. *:MESSAGE 826.20 RRRRRR RRR- to 324C51 12/07/90 64.16 COMM /REV SALES TAX 10- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL'" 324C51 12/07/90 212.53 COMM /REV SALES TAX 23- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 324C51 12/07/90 2.60 COMM /REV SALES TAX 26- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 324C51 12/07/90 5,691.00 COMM /REV SALES TAX 27- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL: >;;,; 324C51 12/07/90 519.18 COMM /REV SALES TAX 28- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 324C51 12/07/90 161.09 COMM /REV SALES TAX 29- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 324C51 12/07/90 222.40 COMM /REV SALES TAX 30- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 324C51 12/07/90 615.85 COMM /REV SALES TAX 40- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 324C51 12/07/90 7,069.32 COMM /REV SALES TAX 50- 3357 - 001 -00 MANUAL' 324C51 12/07/90 12,487.69 COMM /REV SALES TAX 50- 3357 - 002 -00 MANUAL 324C51 12/07/90 12,915.37 COMM /REV SALES TAX 50- 3357- 003 -00 MANUAL 39,961.19 RRRRRR RRR- CKS,,11.; 324E11 12/10/90 .87- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 324E11 12/10/90 2.56- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL.._._ 324E11 12/10/90 3.01- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL:. 324E11 12/10/90 .92- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 324E11 12/10/90 .92- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 324E11 12/10/90 .70- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 324E11 12/10/90 .92 EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL -::;:: 324E11 12/10/90 2.80- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL; <:;; 324E11 12/10/90 14.02- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 324E11 12/10/90 8.72- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 324EII 12/10/90 9.32- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL__.... 324EII 12/10/90 1.72- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL`: 324EII 12/10/90 1.57- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 =86 MANUAL 324E11 12/10/90 256.00 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 324E11 12/10/90 301.45 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 324EII 12/10/90 .87.30 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 324E11 12/10/90 92.18 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 324E11 12/10/90 279.74 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 324EII 12/10/90 69.60 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 324E11 12/10/90 92.18 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 324EII 12/10/90 92.18- EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 842-84 MANUAL 324E11 12/10/90 1,402.27 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 324E11 12/10/90 157.40 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 324E11 12/10/90 171.90 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 324E11 12/10/90 871.50 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL >:: >;; 324E11 12/10/90 931.99 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 4,575.12 RRRRRR RRR -CKS 324E26 12/10/90 8.33- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822-82 MANUAL'.: 324E26 12/10/90 1.74- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 324E26 12/10/90 46.58- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL ;,324E26 12/10/80 2.23- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL .. 324E26 12/10/90 29.11- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -30 -90 PAGE 11 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV..# P.O. # MESSAGE. 324E26. 12/10/90 3.15— ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 324E26 12/10/90 416.68 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 324E26 12/10/90 2,329.20 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL. 324E26 12110190 87.19 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL: 324E26 12/10/90 157.79 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 324E26 12/10/90 157.79— ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 324E26 12/10/90 1,455.63 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 324E26 12/10/90 111.83 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL . 324E26 12/10/90 157.79 ED PHILLIPS - 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 324E26 12/10/90 738.95 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 324E26 12/10/90 208.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 324E26 12/10/90 882.95 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL..,. 324E26 12/10/90 208.00— ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL:::. 324E26 12/10/90 1,166.70 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL ` 324E26 12/10/90 88.41 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 324E26 12/10/90 1,290.81 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84. MANUAL 324E26 12/10/90 24.25 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 324E26 12/10/90 37.90 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL: 324E26 12/10/90 2,271.83 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 324E26 12/10/90 2.,597.25 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 324E26 12/10/90 1,025.68 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL.,_ 324E26 12/10/90 873.95 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL'' is 324E26 12/10/90 1,913.80 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 17,379.66 47--,978-5+ « * * * ** * * * —CKS 324G82 12/10/90 10.58— GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL 324G82 12/10/90 49.62— GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 324G82 12/10/90 63.03— GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL.. 324G82 12/10/90 155.20— GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 —.84 MANUAL 324G82 12/10/90 208.66— GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL P 324G82 12/10/90 14.22— GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 324682 12/10/90 116.04— GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 324G82 12/10/90 9.12— GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 324082 12/10/90 4.90— GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 324G82 12/10/90 5.23— GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 324G82 12/10/90 3,151.73 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 324682 12110%90 10,432.84 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 324G82 12/10/90 7,760.00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 324G82 12/10/90 710.79 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 324G82 12/10/90 245.00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 324G82 12/10/90 261.72 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 324G82 12/10/90 5,801.80 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL.. 324G82 12/10/90 456.05 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 324G82 12/10/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 324G82 12/10/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 28,183.33 324J62 12/10/90 34.19— JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 324J62 12/10/90 6.85— JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 324J62 12/10/90 1.56— JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 324J62 12/10/90 8.84— JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -30 -90 PAGE 12 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 324J62 12/10/90 23.01- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL ` 324J62 12110190 24.31- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 324J62 12/10/90 295.36- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL__.. 324J62 12/10/90 .93- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL::...... 324J62 12/10/90 .93- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 324J62 12/10/90 13.83- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 324J62 12/10/90 .93 JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 324J62 12/10/90 8.05- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 324J62 12/10/90 2.85- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 324J62 12/10/90 97.60- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 324J62 12/10/90 1,710.34 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 324J62 12/10/90 10.33 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 324J62 12/10/90 102.37 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL ' 324J62 12/10/90 14,767.24 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 324J62 12/10/90 4,880.63 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 324J62 12/10/90 1.18 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 324J62 12/10/90 142.55 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 324J62 12/10/90 31.13 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL;: X. 324J62 12/10/90 19.47 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL" 324J62 12/10/90 682.34 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 324J62 12/10/90 882.59 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 324J62 12/10/90 1.77 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 324J62 12/10/90 12.39 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 324J62 12/10/90 156.39 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 324J62 12/10/90 31.47- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 324J62 12/10/90 46.55- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL:;; >::; 324J62 12/10/90 28.32 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL:`:" 324J62 12/10/90 73.75 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 324J62 12/10/90 2,300.08 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 324J62 12/10/90 2,428.19 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL......._ 324J62 12/10/90 1.18 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 852 -86 MANUAL 324J62 12/10/90 11.95 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 =86 MANUAL:. 324J62 12/10/90 1,379.63 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 324J62 12/10/90 92.26- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 324J62 12/10/90 1.18 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL x : : :, 324J62 12/10/90 92.26 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 324J62 12/10/90 806.42 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL'' 324J62 12/10/90 1.18- JOHNSON WINE. 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 324J62 12/10/90 93.44 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL.,,.., 324J62 12/10/90 38.94 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 29,967.22 **A-CKS 324N78 12/10/90 29,184.00 NORWEST BANK BOND PRINCIPAL 10- 1145 - 000 -00 MANUAL`' 324N78 12/10/90 200,000.00 NORWEST BANK BAND PRINCIPAL 10 -1145- 000 -00 MANUAL 229,184.00 324P20 12/10/90 74.95 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 324P20 12/10/90 3.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 324P20 12/10/90 6.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL:;:;: :.::,: 324P20 12/10/90 281.30 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL : - 324P20 12/07/90 26.50 PAUSTIS & SONS MIX 50- 4632 - 862 -86 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -30 -90 PAGE 13 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 391.75 • 324P70 12/10/90 200.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 10- 4290 - 510 -51 200.00 " 324P82 12/10/90 .69- PRIOR WINE -50- 3710 - 822 -82 324P82 12/10/90 7.46- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 324P82 12/10/90 .61- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 324P82 12/10/90 11.51- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 324P82 12/10/90 8.90- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 324P82 12/10/90 5.00- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 324P82 12/10/90 746.11 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 324P82 12/10/90 69.40 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 324P82 12/10/90 60.70 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 324P82 12/10/90 1,150.89 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 324P82 12/10/90 499.75 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 324P82 12/10/90 890.17 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 324P82 12/07/90 17.75 PRIOR WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 862 -86 3,400.60 324Q16 12/10/90 9.75- QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 324Q16 12/10/90 46.97- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 324Q16 12/10/90 11.15- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 324Q16 12/10/90 39.49- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 324Q16 12/10/90 .58- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -,84 324Q16 12/10/90 196.59- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 324Q16 12/10/90 2.93- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 324Q16 12/10/90 1.56- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 324Q16 12/10/90 15.26- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 324Q16 12/10/90 79.49- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 324Q16 12/10/90 1.33- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 324Q16 12/10/90 4.88- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 324Q16 12/10/90 5.18- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 324Q16 12/10/90 2,348.72 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 324Q16 12/07/90 61.00 QUALITY WINE LIQUOR 50 -4626- 842 -84 324Q16 12/10/90 9,826.31 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 324Q16 12/10/90 258.82 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 324Q16 12/10/90 3,973.38 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 324Q16 12/10/90 1,112.55 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 324Q16 12/10/90 975.00 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 324Q16 12/10/90 292.50 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 324Q16 12/10/90 57.90 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 324Q16 12/10/90 3,944.03 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 324Q16 12/10/90 1,523.65 QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 324Q16 12/10/90 487.50 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 324Q16 12/10/90 155.80 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 324Q16 12/10/90 133.00 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 324Q16 12/07/90 60.88 QUALITY WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 24,795.88 " 1990 CITY OF EDINA ACCOUNT NO. INV. CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION * * * * ** MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 324T22 12/10/90 945.00 THE WINE COMPANY MANUAL 324T22 12/10/90 11.00 THE WINE COMPANY 50- 1010- 000 -00 324T22 12/10/90 1,710.00 THE WINE COMPANY MANUAL 324T22 12/10/90 45.00 THE WINE COMPANY 27- 4256- 662 -66 324T22 12/10/90 19.25 THE WINE COMPANY MANUAL 324T22 12/10/90 6.60 THE WINE COMPANY 10- 4149 - 510 -51 324T22 12/10/90 540.00 THE WINE COMPANY * ** -CKS 10- 4156 - 510 -51 MANUAL 3,276.85 * *..- CKS;:;;:;:: 10- 4156 - 510 -51 * * * * ** * * *_ CK5 ';? 10- 4158 - 510 -51 MANUAL 325C33 12/10/90 245,000.00- CITY /EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 325C33 12/10/90 245,000.00 CITY /EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER .00 * * * * * ** 325H83 12/10/90 321,000.00 HRA HRA TRANSFER 321,000.00 * * * * * ** 330A82 12/10/90 6.69 AT &T TELEPHONE 330A82 12/10/90 65.58 AT &T TELEPHONE 330A82 12/10/90 12.77 AT &T TELEPHONE 330A82 12/10/90 2.99 AT &T TELEPHONE 330A82 12/10/90 .71 AT &T TELEPHONE 88.74 * * * * ** 330F14 12/10/90 . 14,033.86 FIDELITY BANK FICA 33OF14 12/10/90 916.95 FIDELITY BANK MEDICARE 14,950.81 * * * * ** 330G86 12/10/90 14,318.97 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 14,318.97 * * * * ** 330M24 12/10/90 16,782.20 MEDCENTER INSURANCE 16,782.20 * * * * ** 330N12 12/10/90 2,309.44 MUTUAL BENEFIT INSURANCE 2,309.44 330P32 12/10/90 26,732.85 P.E.R.A. PERA 11 -30 -90 PAGE 14 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL :, 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL * * *- CKS::..`: 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 50- 1010- 000 -00 MANUAL * *• -CKS 10 -1145- 000 -00 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL. 27- 4256- 662 -66 MANUAL 27- 4256- 664 -66 MANUAL 28- 4256 - 702 -70 MANUAL 40- 4256 - 803 -80 MANUAL.. ,... * ** -CKS 10- 4149 - 510 -51 MANUAL 10- 4162 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4156 - 510 -51 MANUAL *..- CKS;:;;:;:: 10- 4156 - 510 -51 MANUAL * * *_ CK5 ';? 10- 4158 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4145 - 510 -51 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 26,732.85 11 -30 -90 PAGE 15 ACCOUNT NO. INV. 4 P.0.4 MESSAGE * * * * ** 330U27 12/10/90 16.61 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 436 -42 330U27 12/10/90 333.70 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 330U27 12/10/90 165.95 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 622 -62 330U27 12/10/90 38.21 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 646 -64 330U27 12/10/90 39.99 US WEST COMM. TELEPHONE 27- 4256- 662 -66 330U27 12/10/90 157.39 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 27- 4256 - 667 -66 33OU27 12/10/90 98.82 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 28- 4256- 702 -70 330U27 12/10/90 527.69 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 30- 4256- 782 -78 33OU27 12/10/90 54.11 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 30- 4256- 784 -78 1,432.47 331673 12/07/90 50.00 GC PETTY CASH RENTAL 27- 3230 - 000 -00 331873 12/07/90 37.00 GC PETTY CASH GREEN FEES 27- 3420 - 000 -00 331873 12/07/90 50.00 GC PETTY CASH COMP HANDICAPS 27- 3470 - 000 -00 331673 12/07/90 22.00 GC PETTY CASH SCHOOL 27- 4202 - 661 -66 331673 12/07/90 38.77 GC PETTY CASH GENERAL SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 661 -66 331873 12/07/90 121.05 GC PETTY CASH GENERAL SUPPLIES 27n4504- 661 -66 331873 12/07/90 25.38 GC PETTY CASH GENERAL SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 664 -66' 331673 12/07/90 30.90 GC PETTY CASH CLEAN SUPPLYS 27- 4512 - 663 -66 331B73 12/07/90 76.25 GC PETTY CASH PLANTS /TREES 27- 4560 - 664 -66 331873 12/07/90 4.23 GC PETTY CASH PRINTING 27- 4600 - 661 -66 331873 12/07/90 26.25 GC PETTY CASH GASOLINE 27 -4612- 664 -66 331B73 12/07/90 21.48 GC PETTY CASH CONCESSIONS 27- 4624- 663 -66 331673 12/07/90 15.89 GC PETTY CASH SAFETY EQUIP 27- 4642 - 661 -66 519.20 * ****** 332753 12/10/90 104.90 HTC BOOKS 10- 4202 - 160 -16 104.90 * * * 332666 12/10/90 1.18 -. BRW ENTERPRISE 50- 3710- 822 -82 332866 12/10/90 78.60 BRW ENTERPRISE 50- 4628- 822 -82 77.42 *** *** 332EII 12/10/90 3.11- EAGLE WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 332EII 12/10/90 5.90- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 332E11 12/10/90 2.89- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 332E11 12/10/90 11.77 - EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 332E11 12/10/90 5.01- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 332E11 12/10/90 310.84 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 332E11 12/10/90 590.25 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 332E11 12/10/90 289.25 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 332E11 12/10/90 500.59 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 332E11 12/10/90 1,176.61 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL *** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL .._ . MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -30 -90 PAGE 18 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE::,. 332E11 12/07/90 263.87 EAGLE WINE MIX 50- 4632- 842 -84 MANUAL 3,102.73 ' *. e� yes * -CKS:` 332E26 12/10/90 5.44— ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 332E26 12/10/90 7.77— ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 332E26 12/10/90 3.58— ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL:- ;;;:;:: 332E26 12/10/90 17.60— ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 332E26 12/10/90 2.64— ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 332E26 12/10/90 272.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 332E26 12/10/90 179.13 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL,..,..,. 332E26 12/10/90 388.95 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL. 332E26 12/10/90 880.45 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 332E26 12/10/90 132.20 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 332E26 12/10/90 102.70 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 332E26 12/10/90 445.30 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL; 332E26 12/10/90 87.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL` 332E26 12/10/90 314.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL . 332E26 12/10/90 48.50 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628-842 -84 MANUAL 332E26 12/10/90 328.70 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL. . 332E26 12/10/90 317.60 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 332E26 12/10/90 668.80 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 332E26 12/10/90 1,477.28 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 332E26 12/10/90 1,372.60 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 332E26 12/10/90 33.62— ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862-86 MANUAL;:... 332E26 12/10/90 612.44 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL,.' 332E26 12/07/90 31.15 ED PHILLIPS BEER 50- 4630- 822 -82 MANUAL 332E26 12/07/90 30.30 ED PHILLIPS BEER 50- 4630 - 862 -86 MANUAL 7,618.45 " 332G82 12/10/90 30.78— GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL 332G82 12/10/90 12.36— GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL;: < 332G82 12/10/90 130.10— GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL;..:::::" 332G82 12/10/90 60.70— GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 332G82' 12/10/90 2.25— GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 332G82 12/10/90 11.30— GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL,.. 332G82 12/10/90 5.19— GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 822 -82 .. MANUAL: 332G82 12/10/90 30.16— GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 332G82 12/10/90 25.96— GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 332G82 12/10/90 118.31— GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 332G82 12/10/90 13.84— GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL,s;; 332G82 12/10/90 259.59 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL` "' "`' 332G82 12/10/90 564.76 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 332G82 12/10/90 1,297.95 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 332G82 12/10/90 1,507.96 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL........ 332G82 12/10/90 5,915.60 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL' 332G82 12/10/90 692.24 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 332G82 12/10/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 332G82 12/10/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 332G82 12/10/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL:::;:;, 332G82 12/10/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL'' 332G82 12/10/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -30 -90 PAGE 17 CHECK NO. DATE_ AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 332G82 12/10/90 9.13- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 332G82 12/07/90 230.59 GRIGGS COOPER MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 MANUAL 10,018.61 332H83 12/10/90 10,000.00 HRA HRA TRANSFER 10-1145- 000 -00 MANUAL 10,000.00 * * * * ** * * *- CKS .. 332J62 12/10/90 18.96- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 332J62 12/10/90 4.69- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 332J62 12/10/90 3.02- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 332J62 12/10/90 8.90- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL, 332J62 12/10/90 3.66- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 332J62 12/10/90 34.38- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 332J62 12/10/90 3.88- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 332J62 12/10/90 14.00- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86- MANUAL...: 332J62 12/10/90 15.60 - JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL' 332J62 12/10/90 154.43- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 332J62- 12/10/90 6.49 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 332J62 12/10/90 948.36 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 332J62 12/10/90 1,719.20 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 332J62 12/10/90 8.85 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 332J62 12/10/90 .50 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 332J62 12/10/90 49.13 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 332J62 12/10/90 194.38 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL;:;;: 332J62 12/10/90 7,721.23 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 332J62 12/10/90 5.31 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 332J62 12/10/90 468.80 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 332J62 12/10/90 302.68 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL....._,. 332J62 12/10/90 8.85 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL'''" 332J62 12/10/90 22.42 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 332J62 12/10/90 366.73 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 332J62 12/10/90 886.28 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 332J62 12/10/90 4.72 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL . 332J62 12/10/90 19.62 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL' 332J62 12/10/90 1,396.22 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 332J62 12/10/90 1,561.16 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 332J62 12/10/90 40.71 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL. 15,470.12 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 332P42 12/10/90 21,490.50 PHP INSURANCE 10- 4156- 510 -51 MANUAL 21,490.50 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 332P82 12/10/90 2.77- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 332P82 12/10/90 .68- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 332P82 12/10/90 6.74- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 332P82 12/10/90 9.86- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 332P82 12/10/90 256.89 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL-,. 332P82 12/07/90 20.05 PRIOR WINE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 332P82 12/10/90 674.21 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA .82 QUALITY CHECK REGISTER MANUAL 11 -30 -90 PAGE 18 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO'. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 332P82 12/10/90 68.40 PRIOR WINE MANUAL_ 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 332P82 12/10/90 985.88 PRIOR WINE 332016 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 332P82 12/07/90 66.36 PRIOR WINE MIX 50- 4630 - 822 -82 MANUAL..__. 332P82 12/07/90 17.75 PRIOR WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 MANUAL 332P82 12/07/90 41.63 PRIOR WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 862 -86 MANUAL MANUAL.. 332Q16 2,111.12 * 3,875.86 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL: * * * * ** * ** -CKS 332Q16 12/10/90 .82 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 332Q16 12/10/90 8.70- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 332Q16 12/10/90 27.03- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL_ 332Q16 12/10/90 5.22- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL`' 332016 12/10/90 27.41- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 332Q16 12/10/90 9.98- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 332Q16 12/10/90 77.53- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 332Q16 12/10/90 1,351.24 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL.. 332Q16 12/10/90 3,875.86 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL: 332Q16 12/10/90 498.81 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 332Q16 12/10/90 82.25- QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 332Q16 12/10/90 867.65 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 332Q16 12/10/90 520.25 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 332Q16 12/10/90 2,736.16 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 33BE11 12/10/90 9,612.67 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL * * * * ** 12/10/90 823.00 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS 334701 12/10/90 314.44 CHATEAU EDINA ASSO COURT 40- 4201 - 800 -80 MANUAL 338E11 12/07/90 314.44 * EAGLE WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 862 -86 MANUAL ::7762 12/10/90 300.00 J FISCHER TRAVEL ADVANCE 10- 4202 - 420 -42 MANUAL 300.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 338EII 12/10/90 8.31- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 338EII 12/10/90 2.65- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL. 338EII 12/10/90 11.04- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 338E11 12/10/90 4.12- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 338E11 12/10/90 .77- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 338E11 12/10/90 .60- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 338E11 12/10/90 8.23- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL: >_ 338E11 12/10/90 .92- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL':.' 338E'11 12/10/90 264.65 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 338EII 12/10/90 831.43 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 338E11 12/10/90 1,103.67 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 338E11 12/10/90 412.24 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 338E11 12/10/90 76.59 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 338E11 12/10/90 60.20 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 33BE11 12/10/90 92.18 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 338E11 12/10/90 823.00 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 338E11 12/07/90 47.03 EAGLE WINE MIX 50- 4632- 822 -82 MANUAL 338E11 12/07/90 120.71 EAGLE WINE MIX 50- 4632 - 862 -86 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV 338E11 12/07/90 38.35 EAGLE WINE MIX 50- 4632- 862 -86 3,833.41 338E26 12/10/90 18.98- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 338E26 12/10/90 2.84- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 338E26 12/10/90 16.52- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 338E26 12/10/90 1.32- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 338E26 12/10/90 142.22 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 338E26 12/10/90 949.16 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 842 -84 338E26 12/10/90 66.10 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 338E26 12/10/90 826.14 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 338E26 12/10/90 642.00- ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 338E26 12/10/90 642.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 338E26 12/10/90 983.57 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 338E26 12/10/90 642.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 338E26 12/10/90 1,145.55 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 338E26 12/10/90 2,272.88 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 338E26 12/10/90 75.80 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 338E26 12/10/90 3,254.55 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 338E26 12/10/90 726.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 338E26 12/10/90' 781.95 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 338E26 12/10/90 323.73 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 338E26 12/10/90 1,394.85 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 338E26 12/07/90 19.95 ED PHILLIPS BEER 50- 4630 - 822 -82 13,564.79 338G82 12/10/90 18.15- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 842 -.84 338G82 12/10/90 93.15- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3700 - 862 -86 338G82 12/10/90 39.99- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 822 -82 338G82 12/10/90 39.13- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 842 -84 338G82 12/10/90 56.05- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 338G82 12/10/90 28.31- GRIGGS COOPER 50- 3710 - 862 -86 338G82 12/10/90 1,999.63 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 822 -82 338G82 12/10/90 1,956.31 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 842 -84 338G82 12/10/90 2,802.48 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 862 -86 338G82 12/10/90 1,286.65 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4626 - 862 -86 338G82 12/10/90 60.70- GRIGGS COOPER 50 -4628- 822 -82 338G82 12/10/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 842 -84 338G82 12/10/90 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 50- 4628 - 862 -86 7,709.59 * * * * ** 338J62 12/10/90 44.35 -. JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 338J62 12/10/90 4.14- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 338J62 12/10/90 12.39- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 338J62 12/10/90 9.69- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 338J62 12/10/90 91.44- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 338J62 12/10/90 21.65- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 338J62 12/10/90 47.67- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 338J62 12/10/90 7.66- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 11 -30 -90 PAGE 19 # P.O. # MESSAGE;,. MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL. MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -30 -90 PAGE 20 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 338J62 12/10/90 4.35- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 338J62 12/10/90 12.39 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 338J62 12/10/90 2,217.89 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL__,.. 338J62 12/10/90 87.23- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL:-.: , 338J62 12/10/90 4,572.15 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 338J62 12/10/90 34.22 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 338J62 12/10/90 14.61 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 338J62 12/10/90 2,383.91 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL::,... 338J62 12/10/90 1,241.77 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL:`''' 338J62 12/10/90 412.01 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 338J62 12/10/90 12.39 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 338J62 12/10/90 14.75 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL....... 338J62 12/10/90 12.98 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL: 338J62 12/10/90 2,161.69 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL'.° 338J62 12/10/90 970.64 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 338J62 12/10/90 56.64 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 338J62 12/10/90 124.79- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL, .: <;;:; 338J62 12/10/90 19.47 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL; 338J62 12/10/90 763.85 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 338J62 12/10/90 435.82 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 338J62 12/10/90 6.49 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 14,888.31 ** -CKS 338P20 12/10/90 60.40 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL;.:;:: 338P20 12/10/90 3.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 338P20 12/10/90 92.95 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 338P20 12/10/90 3.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 338P20 12/10/90 6.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 338P20 12/10/90 246.05 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 411.40 " * * * * ** * ** -CKS 338P82 12/10/90 .3.85- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 338P82 12/10/90 12.55- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 338P82 12/10/90 .65- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 338P82 12/10/90 6.79- PRIOR WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL,....... 338P82 12/10/90 365.36 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL..'''` 338P82 12/07/90 20.05 PRIOR WINE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 338P82 12/10/90 1,254.92 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 338P82 12/10/90 64.59 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 338P82 12/10/90 679.47 PRIOR WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 338P82 12/07/90 66.36 PRIOR WINE MIX 50- 4632- 842 -84 MANUAL 2,426.91 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 338Q16 12/10/90 5.91- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 338Q16 12/10/90 9.23- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 338Q16 12/10/90 9.80- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 338Q16 12/10/90 .51 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 338016 12/10/90 .57 QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 338Q16 12/10/90 36.50- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -30 -90 PAGE 21 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. $ P.O. # MESSAGE 338Q16 12/10/90 5.16- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 338Q16 12/10/90 14.18- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 338Q16 12/10/90 2.30- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 338Q16 12/10/90 37.52- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL17. 338Q16 12/10/90 1.95- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 338Q16 12/10/90 489.89 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 338Q16 12/10/90 295.35 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 338Q16 12/10/90 1,824.86 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL:.. 338016 12/10/90 1,876.26 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 338Q16 12/10/90 258.16 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 338Q16 12/10/90 50.75- QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 338Q16 12/10/90 920.65 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL... 338Q16 12/10/90 56.75- QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL,. ::.;:: 338Q16 12/10/90 194.75 QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 338Q16 12/10/90 229.75 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 338Q16 12/10/90 1,416.10 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628-862 -86 MANUAL 7,276.80 " ■ *� * **-CKS `. 873,703.02 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 19.50 FUND 12 TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS 969.73 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER 118.23 FUND 26 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUND 10,293.28 FUND 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND 10,925.21 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND 468.35 FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND 8,570.52 FUND 30 TOTAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 27,906.96 FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND 315.96 FUND 41 TOTAL STORM SEWER UTILITY 350,483.30 350,48945 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 1,283,774.06 ', " ° "._'" "' TOTAL 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 351702 12/04/90 395.40 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC CO ELECTRIC REPAIR 395.40 * 351703 12/04/90 299.15 PRO GOLF SPECIALIST GOLF MAT 299.15 * 351704 12/04/90 251.77 METROQUIP INC REPAIR PARTS 351704 12/04/90 42.43 METROQUIP INC REPAIR PARTS 294.20 * 351705 12/04/90 65.00 1990 INVITATIONAL ADVERTISING 65.00 * 351706 12/04/90 3,855.07 HYDRO SUPPLY CO WATER METERS 3,855.07 * 351707 12/04/90 99.00- SPRIGGS PLBG /HTG REPAIRS 351707 12/04/90 990.00 SPRIGGS PLBG /HTG REPAIRS 351707 12/04/90 99.00 SPRIGGS PLBG /HTG REPAIRS 990.00 * 351708 12/04/90 80.00 MN DEPT OF HEALTH LICENSE 80.00 * 351709 12/04/90 4.85 ACTION MESSENGER INC SERVICE CONTRACT 4.85 * 351710 12/04/90 1,875.00 HENN CTY TREASURER PRINTING 1,875.00 * 351711 12/04/90 276.00 MPLS HEALTH DEPT PRO SERVICES 276.00 * 351712 12/04/90 462.45 HOIGAARDS CUSTOM SIGN BAGS 462.45 * 351713 12/04/90 213.00 U OF M SCHOOL 213.00 * 351714 12/11/90 380.00 C WAYNE COURTNEY SERVICES 351714 12/04/90 380.00 C WAYNE COURTNEY SERVICES 760.00 * 351715 12/04/90 100.00 MARIA GENNE PERFORMANCE 1/13/90 100.00 * 351716 12/04/90 75.00 JOHN MINCZESKI PERFORMANCE 2/7/91 75.00 * 351717 12/04/90 40.28 PERSONNEL POOL PRO SERVICE 351717 12/06/90 _ 35.80 PERSONNEL POOL PRO SERVICES 76.08 * 351718 12/04/90 85.00 PEST EX PEST CONTROL PRO SERVICES 85.00 * 12 -17 -90 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 27- 4248 - 667 -66 19360 1851 27- 4504- 667 -66 1342 1850 30- 4540 - 782 -78 473400 1931 30- 4540 - 782 -78 095430 1785 27- 4214 - 667 -66 2019 40- 1220 - 000 -00 3184 5189 28- 4248 - 704 -70 1280 9460 28- 4248 - 704 -70 1280 9460 28- 4248 - 704 -70 1280 9460 10- 4204 - 490 -49 30- 4288 - 781 -78 44394 10- 4600 - 420 -42 776 10- 4201 - 420 -.42 6966 10- 4901 - 420 -42 3585W 1510 27- 4202 - 661 -66 9685 30- 4201 - 782 -78 30- 4201 - 782 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4201 - 782 -78 30- 4201 - 782 -78 23- 4201 - 612 -61 2454 1826 1 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 351719 12/04/90 47.00 CONT CLAY COMPANY GENERAL SUPPLIES 47.00 * 351720 12/04/90 383.27 HENN CTY SHERIFF WORKHOUSE /JAIL 383.27 * 351721 12/04/90 218.95 MARLYS 0 TORING AMBULANCE REFUND 218.95 * 351722 12/04/90 255.00 SHARE AMBULANCE REFUND 255.00 * 351723 12/04/90 255.00 VIRGINIA FLETCHER AMBULANCE REFUND 255.00 * 351724 12/04/90 216.60 ANOKA TECH COLLEGE TUITION 216.60 * * * * * ** 351726 12/11/90 36.90 DISCOM OF MN INC RADIO SERVICE 351726 12/11/90 126.00 DISCOM OF MN INC RADIO SERVICE 351726 12/11/90 94.50 DISCOM OF MN INC RADIO SERVICE 351726 12/06/90 85.00 DISCOM OF MN INC RADIO EQUIP 351726 12/06/90 286.25 DISCOM OF MN INC MAINT CONTRACT 628.65 * 351727 12/06/90 10.25 MIDWEST MACHINERY GASKET 351727 12/06/9C 65.48 MIDWEST MACHINERY REPAIR PARTS 75.73 * 351728 12/06/90 19.16 WALSER FORD REPAIR PARTS 19.16 * 351729 12/06/90 159.84 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGN SIGN 159.84 * 351730 12/06/90 32.88 CHESLEY TRUCK SALES REPAIR PARTS 32.88 * 351731 12/06/90 68.00 ROBERT FALK REFUND 68.00 * 351732 12/06/90 31.50 PATRICK MANTYH REFUND 31.50 * 351733 12/06/90 41.00 SANDRA WILLIS REFUND 41.00 * 351734 12/06/90 27.00 CASANDRA MILECHICK REFUND 351734 12/06/90 27.00 CASANDRA MILECHICK REFUND 351734 12/06/90 27.00- CASANDRA MILECHICK REFUND 27.00 * 351735 12/06/90 76.50 MARY MAHLER REFUND 12 -17 -90 PAGE 2 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 23- 4504 - 611 -61 0530 1374 10- 4286 - 220 -22 10- 3180 - 000 -00 10- 3180 - 000 -00 10- 3180 - 000 -00 27- 4202 - 661 -66 10- 4248 - 440 -44 80602 5051 10- 4248 - 440 -44 80600 5051 10- 4248 - 440 -44 80601 5051 10- 4294 - 560 -56 10101 10- 4294 - 560 -56 10100 10- 4540 - 560 -56 P00252 1735 10- 4540 - 560 -56 P00196 1649 10- 4540 - 560 -56 162403 9979 10- 4542 - 325 -30 31921 1651 10- 4540 - 560 -56 89795 1637 28- 3500 - 000 -00 28- 3500- 000 -00 28- 3500 - 000 -00 28- 3500 - 000 -00 28- 3500- 701 -70 28- 3500 - 701 -70 28- 3500 - 000 -00 * * * -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 351736 351737 351738 351739 351739 351739 351740 351741 351742 351743 351744 351745 351745 351746 351747 351748 351749 351750 351751 351752 12/06/90 12/06/90 12/06/90 12/06/90 12/06/90 12/06/90 12/06/90 12/06/90 12/06/90 12/06/90 12/06/90 12/06/90 12/06/90 12/06/90 12/06/90 12/06/90 12/06/90 12/06/90 12/06/90 12/06/90 AMOUNT 76.50 * 240.00 240.00 * 50.00 50.00 * 2,992.50 2,992.50 * 120.00 120.00 120.00- 120.00 * 130.00 130.00 * 88.95 88.95 * 100.00 100.00 * 80.00 80.00 * 204.60 204.60 * 16.48 201.87 218.35 * 239.00 239.00 * 256.80 256.80 * 50.00 50.00 * 481.00 481.00 * 88.88 88.88 * 37.41 37.41 * 10.95 10.95 * CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION MPLS HOCKEY OFFICIAL WAYZATA HIGH SCHOOL LAKE CONFERENCE STEVE BURNS STEVE BURNS STEVE BURNS FRANK FISCHER TEENERS COSTUME PAT GREER CAROLYN LONNING JEAN HAEFELE MICHAUD COOLEY MICHAUD COOLEY BISHOP TRAVEL FLAMINGO HILTON MN GOLF COMMERCIAL FURNITURE EAGLE ELEVATOR CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE EDINA LIQUOR PREVIEW REFEREES PRINTING PREVIEW PREVIEW Y LAKE PREVIEW LAKE PREVIEW LAKE PREVIEW LAKE PREVIEW GENERAL SUPPLIES EXHIBT FEE PERFORMANCE 12/16/90 COMMISSION PRO SERVICES PRO SERVICES TRAVEL CONFERENCE ADVERTISING USED FURNITURE ELEVATOR REPAIR MEETING EXP FUTURES MEETING 12 -17 -90 PAGE 3 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 28- 4224 - 701 -70 28- 4224 - 701 -70 28- 4224 - 701 -70 28- 4224 - 701 -70 28- 4244 - 701 -70 28- 4244 - 701 -70 28- 4224 - 701 -70 30- 4504 - 782 -78 1932 30- 3501 - 000 -00 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 3501 - 000 -00 30- 4201- 781 -78 24599 8136 30- 4201 - 782 -78 24598 8136 27- 4202 - 661 -66 27- 4202 - 661 -66 27- 4204 - 661 -66 25- 4924 - 520 -52 3994 2123 10- 4248 - 520 -52 1239 10- 4206 - 140 -14 5896 10- 4201 - 505 -50 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 351753 12/10/90 154.90 BUDGET LIGHTING REPAIR LIGHTING 351753 12/06/90 304.50 BUDGET LIGHTING REPAIRS 351753 12/06/90 444.00 BUDGET LIGHTING REPAIRS 903.40 * 351754 12/06/90 2,582.00 ROBERT C. KINGHORN SIGNAGE 351754 12/06/90 1,480.00 ROBERT C. KINGHORN SIGNAGE 4,062.00 * 351755 12/06/90 675.00 MARY D WALTER CONSULTATION 675.00 * 351756 12/06/90 15.00 RECYCLED PAPER CONT ED 15.00 * 351757 12/06/90 950.00 B SIEWERT CREATIONS VIDEOTAPING 950.00 * 351758 12/06/90 670.00 B M GRADE PRINTING 670.00 * 351759 12/06/90 40.00 AMM MEETING EXPENSE 40.00 * 351760 12/06/90 48.00 EDINA CHAMBER MEETING 48.00 * 351761 12/06/90 12.00 HAGA PHOTOGRAPHY PRINT 12.00 * 351762 12/06/90 100.00 MACTA CONT ED 100.00 * 351763 12/06/90 94.16 DON KLINGELHOETS SCHOOL 94.16 * 351764 12/06/90 20.00 STATE OF MN CERTIFICATE 351764 12/06/90 20.00 STATE OF MN CERTIFICATE 40.00 * 351765 12/06/90 89.00 FAST FRAME OFFICE SUPPLIES 89.00 * 351766 12/06/90 239.71 EXCELSIOR MFG /SUPPLY SAFETY GLASSES 239.71 * 351767 12/06/90 45.00 MRPA ANNUAL MEETING REGISTRATION 45.00 * 351768 12/06/90 77.83 BOB BRAMWELL MILEAGE 77.83 * 351769 12/06/90 227.25 DUTCH GARDENS PLANTS 227.25 * 12 -17 -90 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 28- 4248 - 704 -70 19384 2017 28- 4248 - 704 -70 19383 2016 28- 4248 - 704 -70 1844 27- 1300 - 004 -00 1537 27- 1300 - 005 -00 1536 10- 4256- 510 -51 12- 4202 - 434 -43 30- 4201 - 782 -78 2059 10- 4600 - 420 -42 4028 1688 10- 4206 - 140 -14 10- 4206 - 140 -14 10- 4504 - 100 -10 12- 4202 - 434 -43 27- 4202 - 661 -66 10- 4204 - 490 -49 10- 4204 - 490 -49 30- 4516 - 781 -78 692151 2047 10- 4504 - 644 -64 1737 10- 4202 - 600 -60 30- 4208 - 781 -78 30- 4560 - 782 -78 909392 4 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 12 -17 -90 PAGE CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 351770 12/06/90 360.00 REGISTRAR DEPT OF REGISTRATION 10- 4202 - 490 -49 360.00 * 351771 12/10/90 165.00 STATE OF MINNESOTA MN STATUTES 10- 4502 - 140 -14 165.00 * 351772 12/10/90 125.00 PADGETT THOMPSON SCHOOL 10- 4202 - 600 -60 351772 12/10/90 125.00 PADGETT THOMPSON SCHOOL 30- 4202 - 781 -78 250.00 * 351773 12/10/90 8,570.00 E P GUNDERSON INC EXCAVATING 11- 4201 - 127 -12 8,570.00 * 351774 12110190 360.00 MN POLLUTION SEMINAR 40- 4202 - 809 -80 360.00 * 351775 12/10/90 38.90 SIGNAL SYSTEM INC PRINTING 28- 4600 - 701 -70 5582 2024 38.90 * 351776 12/10/90 112.64 TC PHOTOCOPY INC PRINTING 28- 4600 - 701 -70 5957 1953 112.64 * 351777 12/10/90 589.53 INSTRMENT RESEARCH LAKE TESTING 10- 4201 - 358 -30 589.53 * 351778 12/10/90 499.00 US WEST CELLULAR OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 1935 499.00 * 351779 12/10/90 31.20 JEAN HAEFELE COMMISSION 30- 3501 - 000 -00 31.20 * 351780 12110190 1,452.63 PCI CONSTRUCTION 60- 1300 - 280 -04 4228 1,452.63 * 351781 12/10/90 76.65 MPLS SPOKESMAN WANT ADS 10- 4212 - 510 -51 76.65 * 351782 12/10/90 37.00 I.A.A.I. DUES 10- 4204 - 440 -44 37.00 * 351783 12/10/90 135.00 SUSAN FRAME COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 8922 2029 135.00 * 351784 12/10/90 133.33 RICHARD T STEELE FIREARM SAFETY 10- 3500 - 000 -00 133.33 * 351785 12/10/90 1,040.00 JILL A CAMERON COMPUTER CLASSES 10- 4212 - 510 -51 1038 1549 1,040.00 * 351786 12/10/90 540.00 JEAN GRAPP AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 540.00 * 351787 12/10/90 156.00 BOBO ZINN AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 156.00 * 5 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 351788 12/10/90 78.50 HELEN ZABEL AC INSTRUCTOR 78.50 * 351789 12/10/90 300.00 MARGARET GUST AC INSTRUCTOR 300.00 * 351790 12/10/90 266.50 BILL DIETRICHSON AC INSTRUCTOR 266.50 * 351791 12/10/90 168.00 BETSY BRYANT AC INSTRUCTOR 168.00 * 351792 12/10/90 192.00 DOROTHY ODLAND AC INSTRUCTOR 192.00 * 351793 12/10/90 270.00 DANNY MACKERMAN AC INSTRUCTOR 270.00 * 351794 12/10/90 78.00 ADRIANE BRUMFIELD AC INSTRUCTOR 78.00 * 351795 12/10/90 324.00 J THOMAS NELSON AC INSTRUCTOR 324.00 * 351796 12/10/90 105.00 JANE RIFFEY AC INSTRUCTOR 105.00 * 351797 12/10/90 360.00 SUSAN FRAME AC INSTRUCTOR 360.00 * 351798 12/10/90 180.00 PHYLLIS HAYWA AC INSTRUCTOR 180.00 * 351799 12/10/90 718.00 TOBIE DICKER AC INSTRUCTOR 718.00 * 351800 12/10/90 229.00 EVIE HOLMQUIST AC INSTRUCTOR 229.00 * 351801 12/10/90 1,005.00 MARIAN ALSTAD AC INSTRUCTOR 1,005.00 * 351802 12/10/90 420.00 MONICA RUDQUIST AC INSTRUCTOR 420.00 * 351803 12/10/90 630.00 BETH BOGLE AC INSTRUCTOR 351803 12/10/90 63.00 BETH BOGLE AC INSTRUCTOR 351803 12/10/90 630.00- BETH BOGLE AC INSTRUCTOR 63.00 * 351804 12/10/90 168.00 CYD WICKER AC INSTRUCTOR 168.00 * 351805 12/10/90 156.00 LOUISE GILLIS AC INSTRUCTOR 12 -17 -90 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 6 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 12 -17 -90 PAGE 7 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 156.00 * 351806 12/10/90 135.00 KAREN KNUTSON AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 135.00 * 351807 12/10/90 164.00 NICK LEGEROS AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 164.00 * 351808 12/10/90 83.00 SALLY BURNS AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 83.00 * 351809 12/10/90 130.00 BRADLEY BENN PT MAINT AC 23- 4120 - 612 -61 351809 12/10/90 535.39 BRADLEY BENN SUPPLIES 60- 1300 - 015 -20 665.39 * - 351810 12/11/90 485.00 FENC -CO INC REPAIR FENCE 27- 4248 - 667 -66 5075 2186 351810 12/11/90 495.00 FENC -CO INC FENCING 27- 4540 - 644 -64 5074 2180 351810 12/11/90 495.00- FENC -CO INC FENCING 27- 4540 - 644 -64 5074 2180 351810 12/11/90 495.00 FENC -CO INC FENCING 27- 4540 - 664 -66 5074 2180 980.00 * 351811 12/11/90 19.41 LANDSCAPE PROD CTR PLANTINGS 27- 4560 - 664 -66 1626 19.41 * 351812 12/11/90 131.75 VINCE COCKRIEL REFUND /SCHOOL 10- 4202 - 640 -64 131.75 * 351813 12/11/90 147.00 ELECT ADM REPORTS SUBSCRIPTION 10- 4204 - 140 -14 147.00 * 351814 12/11/90 156.83 A M LEANARD INC TREE TOOLS 10- 4580 - 644 -64 121340 1998 351814 12/11/90 103.29 A M LEANARD INC TREE TOOLS 10- 4580 - 644 -64 120912 1981 260.12 * 351815 12/11/90 29.90 NATL CAMERA EXCHANGE REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 667 -66 112597 2070 29.90 * 351816 12/10/90 107.80 JEAN HAEFELE ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 107.80 * 351817 12/10/90 26.25 PAT GREER ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 26.25 * 351818 12/10/90 45.50 REGINA MCGOFF ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 45.50 * 351819 12/10/90 59.75 ANN WIDERSTROM ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 59.75 * 351820 12/10/90 25.00 ANTHONY WHELIHAN ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625-000 -00 25.00 * 351821 12/10/90 31.50 HELEN VAN WINKLE ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 31.50 * 351822 12/10/90 36.40 TIMOTHY VERHY ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT CHECK REGISTER 12 -17 -90 PAGE 8 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * * * -CKS 36.40 * 351823 12/10/90 76.62 SPECIAL EFFECTS ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 76.62 * 351824 12/10/90 21.00 JANAAN RASMUSSEN ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 21.00 * 351825 12/10/90 234.24 MOLLIE PAULSON ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 351825 12/10/90 '227.34 MOLLIE PAULSON SERVICES 23- 4120 - 613 -61 461.58 * 351826 12/10/90 27.30 BARBARA PETT ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 27.30 * 351827 12/10/90 45.50 SHARON MCKISSON ART WORK SOLD 23 -3625- 000 -00 45.50 * 351828 12/10/90 24.50 Bryan Moon Art Work Sold 23- 3625- 000 -00 * * * * ** 24.50* 351829 12/10/90 40.60 JACQUE LINDSCOOG ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 40.60 * 351830 12/10/90 21.70 BARBARA LANZO ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 21.70 * 351831 12/10/90 630.00 PHYLLIS HAYWA ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 351831 12/10/90 630.00 PHYLLIS HAYWA ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 351831 12/10/90 630.00- PHYLLIS HAYWA ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 351831 12/10/90 630.00- PHYLLIS HAYWA ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 351831 12/10/90 63.00 PHYLLIS HAYWA ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 63.00 * 351832 12/10/90 197.75 NANCY GRIMSBEY ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 197.75 * 351833 12/10/90 21.00 SUSAN FRAME ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 21.00 * 351834 12/10/90 79.63 WALLACE FLANDERS ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 79.63 * 351835 12/10/90 35.00 LISA ERICKSON ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 35.00 * 351836 12/10/90 95.20 TOBIE DICKER ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 95.20 * 351837 12/10/90 176.40 HARRY CARLSEN ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 176.40 * 351838 12/10/90 67.20 CAROL BRIGHT ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 '351838 i2�18/qe CAR R:F WO 3.6?5- @66 -D9-- 67.20 gr:7$ 351839 12/11/90 222.50 SECOA CONTRACTED REPAIRS 30- 4248 - 782 -78 59484 * * * -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 351839 12/11/90 196.00 SECOA REPAIR PARTS 418.50 * 351840 12/11/90 333.46 COMTECH INC CONTRACTED REPAIRS 333.46 * 351841 12/11/90 150.00 RICK CARLSSON SERVICES 150.00 * 351842 12/11/90 75.00 NANCY ROZYCKI PERFORMACE 1/31/91 75.00 * 351843 12/11/90 80.00 JAMES TOENSING PERFORMACE 80.00 * 351844 12/11/90 766.48 PAT GREER SERVICES 766.48 * 351845 12/11/90 96.00 ROXANNE SEIDEL SERVICES 96.00•* 351846 12/11/90 600.00 ESPECIALLY RENTAL 600.00 * 351847 12/11/90 735.00 LINDA KOZAK 12/19- 12/31/90 735.00 * 351848 12/11/90 100.00 MIKE RAWLINGS SERVICES 100.00 * 351849 12/11/90 100.00 SUE BORNE PERFORMANCE 3/24/91 100.00 * 351850 12/11/90 650.82 DMJ CORP PAYMENT 650.82 * 351851 12/11/90 312,121.65 ELECTRIC SERV CO PAYMENT 312,121.65 * 351852 12/11/90 2,457.47 NORTHWEST ASPHALT PAYMENT 2,457.47 * 351853 12/11/90 2,556.56 GLENDALE CONTRACTING PAYMENT 2,556.56 * 351854 12/11/90 12,564.50 RICHMAR CONSTRUCTION PAYMENT 12,564.50 * 351855 12/11/90 29,387.11 PROGRESSIVE PAYMENT 29,387.11 * 351856 12/11/90 45,339.50, PITT -DES MOINES INC PAYMENT 45,339.50 * 351857 12/11/90 315.00 SKYWAY PUBLICATIONS ADVERTISING 12 -17 -90 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 30- 4540 - 782 -78 59485 30- 4248 - 782 -78 014211 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4201 - 781 -78 30- 4201 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4201 - 781 -78 30- 4201 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 60- 2040 - 000 -00 90 -11 60- 2040 - 000 -00 90 -10 60- 2040 - 000 -00 90 -9 60- 2040 - 000 -00 90 -8 60- 2040 - 000 -00 90 -1 60- 2040 - 000 -00 89 -13 60- 2040 - 000 -00 89 -3 27- 4214 - 667 -66 12590 2179 9 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 12 -17 -90 PAGE 10 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 315.00 351858 12/11/90 6,819.00 GORDON A MATTSON CONSTRUCTION 11- 4201 - 127 -12 6,819.00_* 351859 12/11/90 2,577.00 HENNEPIN PARKS SKI LESSONS 10- 3500 - 000 -00 2,577.00 * 351860 12/11/90 161.98 ARROYO TIRE CO INC RUBBER TEES 27- 4504- 667 -66 51223 2184 161.98 * 351861 12/11/90 14.33 VETERANS OF ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 822 -82 351861 12/11/90 14.33 VETERANS OF ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 842 -84 351861 12/11/90 14.34 VETERANS OF ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 862 -86 43.00 * 351862 12/11/90 802.00 DONAGHUE DOORS INC DOOR REPAIR 50- 4274 - 821 -82 6103 802.00 * 351863 12/11/90 60.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE #00939 40- 4290 - 800 -80 60.00 * 351864 12/11/90 333.00 KIRK P HARRINGTON ADVERTISING 50- 4214- 822 -82 351864 12/11/90 333.00 KIRK P HARRINGTON ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 842 -84 351864 12/11/90 334.00 KIRK P HARRINGTON ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 862 -86 1,000.00 * 351865 12/11/90 620.60 CROWN PLASTIC CONSTRUCTION 60- 1300 - 015 -20 2064 620.60 * 351866 12/1/90 60.40 JPM STORE FIXTURES CONSTRUCTION 60- 1300 - 015 -20 1966 60.40 * 351867 12/11/90 1,239.63 KUNDE COMPANY OAK WILT PROGRAM 10- 4248 - 644 -64 1,239.63 * 351868 12/11/90 20.00 AM FORESTY ASSOC FORESTY MAGAZINE 10- 4504 - 644 -64 20.00 * 351869 12/11/90 50.00 BRAEMAR CITY OF SUBACRIPTION 28- 4204 - 701 -70 2173\ 351869 12/11/90 5.00 BRAEMAR CITY OF SUBSCRIPTION 28- 4204 - 701 -70 2173 351869 12/11/90 5.00 -, BRAEMAR CITY OF SUBSCRIPTION 28- 4204 - 701 -70 2173 351869 12/11/90 50.00 BRAEMAR CITY OF SUBSCRIPTION 28- 4204 - 701 -70 2173 351869 12/11/90 50.00- BRAEMAR CITY OF SUBASCRIPTION 28- 4204 - 701 -70 2173\ 50.00 * 351870 12/11/90 72.68 DAN DORNSEIF MILEAGE 27- 4208 - 661 -66 72.68 * 351871 12111190 648.00 BAG BOY PULL CART 27- 4504 - 661 -66 8261 648.00 * 351872 12/11/90 795.00 EDEN SYSTEMS INC TRIMS 10- 4901 - 140 -14 2188 795.00 * 351873 12/11/90 75.00 NFPA DUES 10- 4204 - 440 -44 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 351874 12/11/90 351875 12/11/90 351875 12/11/90 351875 12/11/90 351876 12/11/90 * * * * ** 351A03 * * * * ** 351A13 * * * * ** 351A29 351A29 351A29 * * * * ** 351A39 351A39 351A39 351A39 351A39 351A39 * * * * ** 351A49 351A49 351A49 351A49 351A49 351A49 351A49 351A49 * * * * ** 351A54 12/06/90 12/04/90 12/04/90 12/04/90 12/04/90 12/04/90 12/04/90 12/05/90 12/05/90 12/04/90 12/05/90 12/06/90 12/06/90 12/06/90 12/06/90 12/10/90 12/06/90 12/06/90 12/06/90 12/06/90 AMOUNT 75.00 * 305.00 305.00 * 3.30- 3.30 33.00 33.00 * 132.00 132.00 * 95.40 95.40 * 28.08 28.08 * 49.15 4.47 50.37 103.99 * 56.50 37.68 125.00 50.00 55.50 43.90 368.58 10.93 182.17 114.18 7.35 877.34 57.95 58.73 23.78 1,332.43 45.15 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION R N BEIM AMBULANCE REFUND. COMPRESSED AIR SEALS COMPRESSED AIR SEALS COMPRESSED AIR SEALS RADIO INSTALLS INC RADIO SERVICE ACCOUNT NO. IN' 10- 3180 - 000 -00 10 -4504- 440 -44 10- 4504 - 440 -44 10- 4504 - 440 -44 10- 4226 - 440 -44 12 -17 -90 PAGE 11 V. # P.O. # MESSAGE 28707 28707 28707 19698 5057 * ** -CKS A -Z RENTAL TRENCHERS 27 -4248- 664 -66 85143 2036 * ** -CKS ARTSIGN CRAFT-SUPPLIES 23- 4588 - 611 -61 59737 1547 * ** -CKS AAGARD RECYCLING 10- 4250- 540 -54 * ** -CKS ALBINSON GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 260 -26 698006 5352 ALBINSON ..LEADS.. 10- 4504 - 260 -26 698370 5352 ALBINSON GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 260 -26 698015 * ** -CKS ALTERNATOR REBUILD GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 301 -30 7099 1501 ALTERNATOR REBUILD BATTERY 10- 4504 - 560 -56 7106 1721 ALTERNATOR REBUILD ALTERNATOR 10- 4540 - 560 -56 12840 1720 ALTERNATOR REBUILD ALTERNATOR 10- 4540 - 560 -56 12869 1754 ALTERNATOR REBUILD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 7100 1717 ALTERNATOR REBUILD STARTER 10- 4540-560 -56 8579 2854 * ** -CKS AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 4200 - 482 -48 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 440 -44 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 520 -52 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 27- 4262 - 663 -66 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 30- 4504 - 782 -78 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50- 4262 - 821 -82 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50- 4262- 841 -84 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50- 4262 - 861 -86 * ** -CKS AAGARD RECYCLING 10- 4250- 540 -54 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 12 -17 -90 PAGE 12 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 351A54 12/10/90 36.75 AAGARD RECYCLING 50- 4250 - 821 -82 351A54 12/10/90 36.75 AAGARD RECYCLING 50- 4250 - 841 -84 351A54 12/10/90 36.75 AAGARD RECYCLING 50- 4250 - 861-86 155.40 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 351A76 12/04/90 152.15 ASPLUND COFFEE COST /GOODS 28- 4624- 703 -70 11028 1922 351A76 12/11/90 400.90 ASPLUND COFFEE COST /GOOD SOLD 28- 4624- 703 -70 11833 2053 553.05 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 351605 12/10/90 33.50 BACH -BILL REIMBURSEMENT 30- 4516 - 781 -78 33.50 * 351606 12/04/90 123.52 BACHMANS TREES 10- 4560- 644 -64 351606 12/04/90 495.31 BACHMANS CONSTRUCTION 60- 1300 - 209 -30 618.83 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 351614 12/05/90 49.07 BOYER TRUCK PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 880960 1758 351614 12/05/90 50.18 BOYER TRUCK PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 880083 1988 351614 12/05/90 95.60 BOYER TRUCK PARTS CHAMBER 10- 4540 - 560 -56 880868 1989 194.85 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 351617 12/10/90 182.40 BFI RECYCLING SYS CONTRACTED SERVICES 10- 4226 - 507 -50 10324 351617 12/10/90 33,785.15 BFI RECYCLING SYS CONTRACTED SERVICES 10- 4226 - 507 -50 33,967.55 * 351618 12/05/90 292.24 BATTERY WAREHOUSE BATTERY 10- 4540 - 560 -56 62044 1710 351618 12/05/90 111.96 BATTERY WAREHOUSE BATTERY 10- 4540 - 560 -56 60012 1584 404.20 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 351822 12/10/90 45.60 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 27- 4630- 663 -66 5505 351B22 12/10/90 558.91 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 50- 4630- 822 -82 351622 12110190 1,326.65 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 50- 4630- 842 -84 351622 12/11/90 959.90 BEER WHOLESALERS BEER 50- 4630 - 862 -86 2,891.06 *. * * * * ** * ** -CKS 351624 12/04/90 317.41 BLEVENS CONS SUPPLY COST /GOODS 28- 4624 - 703 -70 331431 1921 317.41 * 351625 12/05/90 100.00 BENNETT -WAYNE POLICE SERVICE 10- 4100 - 430 -42 100.00 * * *R * *R * ** -CKS 351B27 12/05/90 154.46 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 50- 4626- 822 -82 1990 CITY OF EDINA 40.70 BFI CHECK REGISTER INC GARBAGE 12 -17 -90 PAGE 13 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR OF MN ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 4 P.O. # MESSAGE 351827 12/05/90 445.83 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 50- 4626- 842 -84 GARBAGE 10- 4250- 440 -44 351827 12/05/90 405.30 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 50- 4626 - 862 -86 GARBAGE 10- 4250 - 520 -52 351859 12/06/90 1,005.59 BFI OF MN INC GARBAGE 10- 4250 - 540 -54 351859 * * * * ** 52.24 BFI OF MN INC GARBAGE 23- 4250 - 612 -61 351659 * ** -CKS 351630 12/06/90 141.44 BERTELSON BROS. INC. BINDERS 10- 4201 - 505 -50 621699 2122 351830 12/10/90 83.92 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 510 -51 626280 BFI 351830 12/06/90 1.10 BERTELSON BROS. INC. SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 613945 OF 351630 12/04/90 135.94 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 MN 351630 12/04/90 55.00 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 622693 INC 351830 12/06/90 10.69 BERTELSON BROS. INC. SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 606675 351830 12/06/90 11.16 BERTELSON BROS. INC. SIGN 10- 4504 - 510 -51 600622 **A-CKS 351930 12/04/90 80.76 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 510 -51 623879 351630 12/04/90 9.50 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 510 -51 623008 GENERAL SUPPLIES 351630 12/04/90 9.50 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 510 -51 622755 351B30 12/04/90 67.60 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 27- 4516 - 667 -66 620678 1839 351630 12/11/90 10.80 BERTELSON BROS. INC. CONCESSIONS SUPPLIES 28- 4512 - 703 -70 623498 1947 351630 12/06/90 38.00 BERTELSON BROS. INC. SUPPLIES 28- 4512 - 703 -70 623763 1951 351630 12/06/90 75.18 BERTELSON BROS. INC. SUPPLIES 28- 4512 - 703 -70 624132 1965 351830 12/06/90 116.56 BERTELSON BROS. INC. SUPPLIES 28- 4512 - 703 -70 623498 1947 351630 12/04/90 40.69 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 626393 1843 887.84 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 351642 12/05/90 14.96 BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 781 -78 351642 12/05/90 5.99 BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 781 -78 351842 12/11/90 9.99 BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516- 781 -78 351642 12/11/90 23.37 BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 54.31 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 351859 12/06/90 40.70 BFI OF MN INC GARBAGE 10- 4201 - 395 -30 351659 12/06/90 417.86 BFI OF MN INC GARBAGE 10- 4250 - 301 -30 351859 12/06/90 156.70 BFI OF MN INC GARBAGE 10- 4250- 440 -44 351659 12/06/90 156.70 BFI OF MN INC GARBAGE 10- 4250 - 520 -52 351859 12/06/90 417.85 BFI OF MN INC GARBAGE 10- 4250 - 540 -54 351859 12/06/90 52.24 BFI OF MN INC GARBAGE 23- 4250 - 612 -61 351659 12/06/90 156.70 BFI OF MN INC GARBAGE 27- 4250 - 662 -66 351B59 12/06/90 24.12 BFI OF MN INC GARBAGE 27- 4250 - 664 -66 351B59 12/06/90 99.07 BFI OF MN INC GARBAGE 27- 4250 - 667 -66 351659 12/06/90 313.39 BFI OF MN INC GARBAGE 28- 4250 - 702 -70 351659 12/06/90 26.12 BFI-OF MN INC GARBAGE 50- 4250 - 841 -84 351659 12/06/90 26.12 BFI OF MN INC GARBAGE 50- 4250 - 861 -86 1,887.57 * * * * * ** **A-CKS 351878 12/06/90 350.02 BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC CLEANING SUPPLIES 10- 4512 - 520 -52 175065 1954 350.02 * 351679 12/05/90 41.28 BROCK WHITE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 301 -30 1581 351679 12/05/90 485.10 BROCK WHITE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 560 -56 1583 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 351879 12/04/90 82.56 BROCK WHITE POLYFILM 608.94 * * * * * ** 351881 12/11/90 8,465.35 BRW INC. CONSTRUCTION 351681 12/05/90 658.75 BRW INC. PRO SERVICES 9,124.10 * 351882 12/11/90 22.00 BRUNSON INSTRUMENT ROD LEVELS 22.00 * * * * * ** 351C01 12/04/90 26.95 C & S DISTRIBUTING COST /GOODS SOLD 351C01 12/04/90 20.47 C & S DISTRIBUTING COST /GOODS SOLD 47.42 * * * * * ** 351CO3 .12/11/90 304.92 CUMMINS DIESEL SALES REPAIR PARTS 304.92 * * * * * ** 351C07 12/11/90 1,356.09 CARGILL INC. SALT 351C07 12/11/90 2,712.74 CARGILL INC. SALT 351C07 12/11/90 1,367.72 CARGILL INC. SALT 5,436.55 351C09 12/04/90 103.90 CARLSON PRINTING BUSINESS CARDS 103.90 * 351C12 12/11/90 196.75 CORNER MARKING CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 351C12 12/11/90 86.60 CORNER MARKING CO SIGNAGE 283.35 * * * * * ** 351C25 12/10/90 213.75 CHAPIN PUBLISHING AD FOR BIDS 213.75 * 351C32 12/06/90 96.14 FRAN CALLAHAN NOV MILEAGE 96.14 * * * * * ** 351C34 12/11/90 18,961.13 CITY OF RICHFIELD SERVICES 18,961.13 * 12 -17 -90 PAGE 14 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 41- 4504 - 900 -90 1581 * ** -CKS 27- 1300 - 003 -00 60187 30- 4201 - 781 -78 53789A 1962 10- 4504- 260 -26 082478 5253 * ** -CKS 23- 4624 - 613 -61 114683 1820 23- 4624 - 613 -61 114627 1820 * ** -CKS 30- 4540 - 782 -78 160322 * ** -CKS 10- 4538 - 318 -30 674759 10- 4538- 318 -30 672260 10- 4538- 318 -30 671322 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 140 -14 049483 * ** -CKS 27- 4504- 667 -66 7258 2194 27- 4516- 662 -66 7258 2195 * ** -CKS 10- 4210 - 140 -14 * ** -CKS 10- 4208 - 480 -48 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 600 -60 70230 1990 CITY OF EDINA d CHECK REGISTER 12 -17 -90 PAGE 15 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O..# MESSAGE * * * * ** ** *_CKS 351C36 12/04/90 12.25 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV. WINDOW CLEANING 50 -4248- 821 -82 351C36 12/04/90 12.25 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV WINDOW CLEANING 50- 4248 - 841 -84 351C36 12/04/90 12.25 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERV WINDOW CLEANING 50- 4248 - 861 -86 36.75 R * * * * R * * * — C K S^ 351044 12/11/90 121.00 COCA COLA BOTTLING COKE 27- 4624- 662 -66 5507 351C44 12/10/90 291.00 COCA COLA BOTTLING COKE 28- 4624 - 703 -70 351C44 12/10/90 327.19 COCA COLA BOTTLING MIX 50 -4632- 822 -82 351C44 12110190 1,097.22 COCA COLA BOTTLING MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 351C44 12/11/90 617.87 COCA COLA BOTTLING COKE 50- 4632 - 862 -86 2,454.28 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 351C49 12/10/90 11,813.80 COMPUTERLAND NETWORK 10- 4902 - 490 -49 1004 11,813.80 * * * *** * ** -CKS 351064 12/06/90 120.68 SYSCO MINNESOTA SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 663 -66 351064 12/06/90 718.55 SYSCO MINNESOTA FOOD 27- 4624 - 663 -66 5510 839.23 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 351C71 12/11/90 18.15 COOL AIR MECHANICAL REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 704 -70 52074 8512 18.15 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 351C93 12/05/90 470:23 CERT HYD SPEC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 81194 1987 470.23 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 351D01 12/05/90 176.02 DIST LAUNDRY LAUNDRY /UNIFORMS 30- 4262 - 782 -78 176.02 * * * * * ** ** *._CKS:; 351D07 12/04/90 86.04 D.C. HEY CO. CONTRACTED "REPAIRS 23- 4249- 612 -61 205069 1823 351D07 12/05/90 48.13 D.C. HEY CO. SERVICE CONTRACT 30- 4288 - 781 -78 134.17 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 351D09 12/11/90 7.50 DAEHN - MARCELLA MEETING EXPENSES 10- 4206 - 140 -14 351D09 12/11/90 42.99 DAEHN - MARCELLA MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 140 -14 351D09 12/11/90 DAEHN - MARCELLA ELECTION SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 180 -18 57.502 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE k k k* k k DAIRY 35027 12/06/90 k k k k k k 351D29 12/11/90 kkkkkk POLICE SERVICE 351D31 12/10/90 k k k k k k PRO SERVICE 351D54 12/05/90 kkkkkk BEER 351D61 12/05/90 k k k* k R BEER 351D78 12/06/90 k k k k k k STORM SEWER GRATES 351Ei4 12/05/90 k k k k k k 351E17 12/11/90 351E17 12/10/90 351E17 12/11/90 kkkkkk 351E33 12/06/90 k k k k k k 351E94 12/04/90 351E94 12/04/90 351E94 12/04/90 351E94 12/10/90 AMOUNT 55.29 55.29 * 160.70 160.70 * 25.37 25.37 * 100.00 100.00 * 100.00 100.00 * 1,538.00 1, 538.00 * 192.12 192.12 * 4,207.85 7,828.70 7,823.35 19,859.90 * 100.00 100.00 * 488.00 472.00 2,953.00 910.00 4,823.00 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION DAVE S FOOD WAGON DAIRY DAVIDSEN DIST. INC. BEER DAVIES WATER EQUIP REPAIR PARTS DAVID BLOOD POLICE SERVICE DICK NISSEN POLICE SERVICES DEDE HENSEL PRO SERVICE EARL F. ANDERSON SIGN EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER EDINA CHAM OF COM MEMBERSHIP ESS BROS & SONS STORM SEWER GRATES ESS BROS & SONS STORM SEWER GRATES ESS BROS & SONS STORM SEWER GRATES ESS BROS & SONS STORM SEWER GRATES 12 -17 -90 PAGE 16 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 27- 4624 - 663 -66 5508 * ** -CKS 50- 4630 - 842 -84 * ** -CKS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 3029 1893 * ** -CKS 10- 4100- 430 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 **A-CKS 28- 4224 - 701 -70 * ** -CKS 10- 4542 - 325 -30 102095 1990 * ** -CKS 50- 4630- 822 -82 50- 4630 - 842 -84 50- 4630- 862 -86 * ** -CKS 10- 4204 - 140 -14 * ** -CKS 41- 4552- 900 -90 3107 1762 41- 4552- 900 -90 3106 1761 41- 4552 - 900 -90 3003 1570 41- 4552 - 900 -90 2806 2065 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT k x k x x k 351F02 12/06/90 250.00 351F02 12/06/90 833.55 351F02 12/06/90 672.59 1,756.14 * xxxxxx 351F11 12/04/90 99.63 99.63 * xxxkxk 351F26 12/05/90 359.08 359.08 * xxxxxk 351G01 12/04/90 644.58 351G01 12/04/90 213.60 351G01 12/04/90 259.20 351G01 12/04/90 208.80 351G01 12/04/90 89.20 351G01 12/04/90 19.60 351G01 12/04/90 331.45 1,766.43 * xxxxxx 351G15 12/11/90 28.00 28.00 * xxkxxx 351G30 12/04/90 11.50 11.50 * kxkxxk 351G32 12/11/90 308.75 308.75 * kxxxxx 351G38 12/05/90 100.00 100.00 * :::G 46 12/11/90 25.00 351G46 12/11/90 25.00 351G46 12/05/90 37.50 87.50 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION FACILITY SYSTEMS REMODELING FACILITY SYSTEMS REMODELING FACILITY SYSTEMS REMODELING FEED RITE CONTROL ANHYDROUS AMMONIA FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL G & K SERVICES G & K SERVICES G & K SERVICES G & K SERVICES G & K SERVICES G & K SERVICES G & K SERVICES GEM TAP SERV GENERAL SPORTS GOPHER STATE 1 CALL GEORGE BUTLER GARVENS GREETINGS GARVENS GREETINGS GARVENS GREETINGS GENERAL SUPPLIES LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY CLEANING SUPPLIES LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY BEER LINES SOCCER BALLS SERVICES POLICE SERVICES GIFT BAGS GIFT BAGS GIFT BAGS 12 -17 -90 PAGE 17 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 25- 4924 - 520 -52 51618 9928 25- 4924 - 520 -52 53184 9928 25- 4924 - 520 -52 52550 9928 * ** -CKS 10- 4570 - 260 -26 149286 1942 * ** -CKS 40- 4504 - 802 -80 4158 1289 * ** -CKS 10- 4262- 301 -30 10- 4262- 560 -56 10- 4262 - 646 -64 10- 4512 - 540 -54 28- 4262 - 702 -70 30- 4262 - 782 -78 40- 4262 - 801 -80 * ** -CKS 27- 4630 - 663 -66 5500 * ** -CKS 27- 4504 - 667 -66 32355 2020 * ** -CKS 10- 4318 - 280 -28 * ** -CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 kxk -CKS 50- 4632 - 842 -84 2246 50- 4632 - 862 -86 2243 50- 4632 - 862 -86 2244 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE * * * * ** 351G58 12/05/90 * * * * ** GENERAL SUPPLIES 351H2O 12/11/90 351H21 12/05/90 351H21 12/05/90 351H21 12/05/90 351H22 12/05/90 31,1132 12/10/90 351H33 12/04/90 * * * * ** PANEL 351H36 12/11/90 * * * * ** POLICE SERVICES 351H42 12/06/90 :::H 62 12/06/90 * * * * ** 351H65 12/05/90 * * * * ** 351I05 12/06/90 * * * * ** 351I59 12/11/90 * * * * ** AMOUNT 48.00 48.00 * 1,620.00 1,620.00 * 267.09 121.14 134.93 523.16 * 100.00 100.00 * 98.92 98.92 110.46 110.46 * 279.77 279.77 * 112.80 112.80 * 11.65 11.65 * 100.00 100.00 * 612.00 612.00 * 8.40 8.40 * CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION GOPHER STAGE LTNG GENERAL SUPPLIES HARMON CONTRACT GENERAL SUPPLIES HARMON GLASS WINDSHIELDS HARMON GLASS WINDSHIELDS HARMON GLASS WINDSHIELDS HAROLD SWANSON POLICE SERVICES Diana Hedges Supplies HENN CTY SHERIFF EQUIP MAINT HENN CTY MED CENTER AMBULANCE SUPPLIES HERMAN MILLER INC. PANEL HOFF MARKING DEVICE RUBBER STAMP HOFFMAN- WILLIAM POLICE SERVICES I C M A DUES INTERIOR COM SYS. TELEPHONE 12 -17 -90 PAGE 18 ACCOUNT NO. INV. #.P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 30- 4504 - 783 -78 18740 1933 * ** -CKS 30- 4504 - 782 -78 1221 10- 4248 - 560 -56 1647 10- 4248 - 560 -56 1648 10- 4248 - 560 -56 1515 10- 4100 - 430 -42 23,- 4504 - 612 -61 * ** -CKS 10- 4274 - 420 -42 * ** -CKS 10-4510-440-44 1025 5058 * ** -CKS 10- 4901 - 420 -42 508799 9928 * ** -CKS 40- 4504- 807 -80 604292 1888 ** *-CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4204 - 140 -14 * ** -CKS 30- 4256- 782 -78 030297 * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF. EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 351I61 12/05/90 219.96 351I61 12/05/90 3.58 223.54 * k k * k 351J23 12/04/90 135.80 351J23 12/04/90 244.65 380.45 * k k k k k k 351J27 12/06/90 53.37 351J27 12/10/90 25.65 351J27 12/10/90 26.45 351J27 12/10/90 25.87 131.34 * k k k k k k 351J74 12/10/90 146.10 351J74 12/10/90 238.94 385.04 * kkkkkk 351J97 12/11/90 976.80 976.80 * k k k k k k 351J99 12/11/90 40.00 40.00 * k k k k k k 351K35 12/04/90 100.58 351K35 12/04/90 108.14 351K35 12/11/90 123.61 351K35 12/04/90 62.78 351K35 12/11/90 39.18 351K35 12/11/90 46.77 481.06 * kkkkkk 351K57 12/11/90 3,349.70 351K57 12/10/90 5,536.00 8,885.70 * k k k k k k 351L01 12/04/90 975.00 975.00 * CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION INTERSTATE TUNE UP INTERSTATE GASKET JR JOHNSON SUP JR JOHNSON SUP JERRYS FOODS JERRYS FOODS JERRYS FOODS JERRYS FOODS JUSTUS LUMBER JUSTUS LUMBER JOANNA FOOTE JANET CANTON KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KUETHER DIST. CO KUETHER DIST. CO LINDA KOZAK GENERAL SUPPLIES LITE SET FOOD GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES LUMBER GENERAL SUPPLIES SERVICE MILEAGE /LOGIS LUMBER STRIPPING REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS LUMBER BEER BEER PRO SERVICES 12 -17 -90 PAGE 19 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4248 - 560 -56 126055 1659 10-4540-560-56 157538 1718 * ** -CKS 30- 4504 - 782 -78 95935 2008 30- 4504 - 782 -78 873931 9130 10- 4201 - 505 -50 23- 4504 - 611 -61 23- 4504 - 611 -61 23- 4504 - 611 -61 27- 4604 - 662 -66 70244 1959 40- 4504 - 802 -80 69621 1766 12 -4201- 434 -43 10- 4208 - 160 -16 10- 4504 - 314 -30 10- 4504 - 343 -30 27- 4540 - 667 -66 27- 4540 - 667 -66 27- 4540 - 667 -66 27- 4604- 662 -66 50- 4630 - 822 -82 50- 4630- 842 -84 30- 4201 - 781 -78 740651 712477 726609 729525 704300 705412 1632 1655 2023 1703 2050 2037 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE * * * * ** 351L28 12/04/90 351L28 12/04/90 351L28 12/04/90 351L28 12/04/90 351L28 12/04/90 351L28 12/04/90 351L28 12/04/90 351L28 12/04/90 351L28 12/04/90 351L28 12/04/90 351L28 12/04/90 351L28 12/04/90 351L28 12/04/90 351L28 12/04/90 351L28 12/04/90 351L28 12/04/90 * * * * ** 351L34 12/10/90 * * * * ** PRODUCTS 351L38 12/06/90 * * * * ** 1357 351L56 12/04/90 351L56 12/06/90 351L56 12/04/90 351L56 12/04/90 351L56 12/10/90 351L56 12/10/90 * * * * ** 1485 351L70 12/11/90 * * * * ** TOOLS 351L82 12/11/90 351L82 12/11/90 351L82 12/06/90 351L82 12/11/90 . CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 12 -17 -90 PAGE 20 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 95.05 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 322 -30 1484 362.34 LAWSON PRODUCTS DRILL BIT 10- 4504 - 343 -30 1486 384.37 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 343 -30 1486 185.78 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 540 -54 1487 375.93 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 560 -56 1590 130.98 LAWSON PRODUCTS DRILL BIT 10- 4504 - 646 -64 1357 130.98 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 1488 130.00 LAWSON PRODUCTS TOOLS 10- 4580 - 301 -30 1485 477.11 LAWSON PRODUCTS TOOLS 10- 4580 - 560 -56 1588. 481.84 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 7889 335.94 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 10- 4620 - 560=56 1357 455.73 LAWSON PRODUCTS SAFETY EQUIP 10- 4642 - 301 -30 1587 472.57 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 1483 326.11 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 1356 255.04 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 1586 448.56 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 1355 5,048.33 * 22.50 LEEF BROS. INC. TOWELS 27- 4262 - 664 -66 22.50 * 864.00 LEITNER COMPANY TOPDRESSING 27- 4562- 664 -66 131499 1725 864.00 * 10.75 LINHOFF DEVELOP FILM 10- 4504 - 260 -26 182233 5.00 LINHOFF MAG EXP 12- 4215 - 434 -43 182098 10.75 LINHOFF PHOTO SUPPLIES 12- 4508 - 434 -43 179737 10.75 LINHOFF PHOTO SUPPLIES 12- 4508 - 434 -43 180034 134.00 LINHOFF ADVERTISING 30- 4600- 781 -78 182099 21.60 LINHOFF ADVERTISING 30- 4600 - 781 -78 181591 192.85 * 90.00 LUCY ROSCHE CLEANING 27- 4201 - 662 -66 30611 1463 90.00 * 28.01 LYNDALE HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 337083 102.80 LYNDALE HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504- 782 -78 325890 19.94 LYNDALE HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIE 30- 4504 - 782 -78 330624 7.85 LYNDALE HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 335737 158.60 * * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * * * * ** * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 351L97 12/05/90 100.00 100.00 * kkk *kR 50- 4630 - 842 -84 351M02 12/05/90 70.08 50- 4630 - 862 -86 70.08 * kkkkRk COFFEE 10- 4504 - 510 -51 351M07 12/10/90 6,018.90 351M07 12/10/90 8,169.30 351M07 12/11/90 8,273.00 10- 4504 - 648 -64 25705 22,461.20 * kk *kkk SUPPLIES 10- 4512- 540 -54 351M18 12/06/90 73.60 PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 73.60 * RRRRRR MERIT SUPPLY CLEANER 351M22 12/05/90 151.90 MERIT SUPPLY REPAIR SCRUBBER 151.90 * R R R R R R 1948 MERIT SUPPLY 351M27 12/04/90 418.25 351M27 12/05/90 328.00 351M27 12/05/90 464.25 351M27 12/05/90 467.50 351M27 12/06/90 497.84 351M27 12/11/90 80.40 351M27 12/06/90 445.00 351M27 12/11/90 291.35 351M27 12/04/90 479.90 351M27 12/10/90 472.30 351M27 12/11/90 1,474.00 MESSERLI & KRAMER 5,418.79 * R R R R R R 351M29 12/05/90 36.00 351M29 12/05/90 157.15 CIGARETTES 50- 4632 - 842 -84 193.15 * R k R R k R 351M32 12/05/90 242.88 351M32 12/05/90 214.44 351M32 12/11/90 352.02 351M32 12/05/90 258.70 351M32 12/11/90 167.30 1,235.34 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION MERFELD -BERT POLICE SERVICES MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. SPROCK 12 -17 -90 PAGE 21 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4100 - 430 -42 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10178 1713 MARK VII SALES BEER 50- 4630 - 822 -82 MARK VII SALES BEER 50- 4630 - 842 -84 MARK VII SALES BEER 50- 4630 - 862 -86 MCGARVEY COFFEE COFFEE 10- 4504 - 510 -51 94794 MCNEILUS STEEL STEEL /CONCRETE 41- 4504 - 900 -90 25731 1475 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 648 -64 25705 1891 MERIT SUPPLY SUPPLIES 10- 4512- 540 -54 25580 1646 MERIT SUPPLY PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 25613 1730 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANER 10- 4620 - 560 -56 25614 1729 MERIT SUPPLY REPAIR SCRUBBER 28- 4248 - 704 -70 25706 1948 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 28- 4512 - 702 -70 25783 1960 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 28- 4512 - 702 -70 25732 2014 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 28- 4512 - 702 -70 25784 2124 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 25685 1952 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 30- 4512 - 782 -78 25764 2044 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 25667 1862 MESSERLI & KRAMER AMBULANCE COLLECT 10- 3180 - 000 -00 MESSERLI & KRAMER AMBULANCE COLLECT 10- 3180 - 000 -00 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632- 822 -82 1934 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632 - 842 -84 1953 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632 - 842 -84 2083 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632 - 862 -86 1933 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632- 862 -86 2063 s * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA 21.06 CHECK REGISTER PHONE EQUIP 12 -17 -90 PAGE 22 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR MN ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE kkkkkk RENTAL 10- 4226- 420 -42 351M68 12/04/90 41.94 MN kkk -CKS 351M36 12/10/90 145.72 MINVALCO 351M6.8 REPAIR PARTS 30- 4540 - 782 -78 120120 2022 CELLULAR PHONE 145.72 RENTAL 10- 4226- 420 -42 351M68 12/04/90 16.57 kkkkkk CELLULAR PHONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 351M68 kkk -CKS 351M42 12/04/90 137.00 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 301 -30 4987 351M42 12/10/90 124.62 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 301 -30 10- 4226 - 420 -42 351M42 12/04/90 224.78 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4524- 301 -30 5076 351M42 12/04/90 465.17 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4528 - 314 -30 1054 351M42 12/10/90 699.82 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10- 4528- 314 -30 351M42 12/10/90 108.48- MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. CREDIT 40- 4524 - 803 -80 351M42 12/10/90 1,079.38- MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 40- 4524- 803 -80 MN. 351M42 12/04/90 3,161.32 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 40- 4524 - 803 -80 5130 351M42 12/10/90 1,035.37 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 40- 4524 - 803 -80 351M42 12/10/90 1,079.38 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 40- 4524- 803 -80 351M73 351M42 12/10/90 1,079.38 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 40- 4524 - 803 -80 351M42 12/10/90 1,079.38- MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 40- 4524 - 803 -80 5,739.60 kk *kkk kkk -CKS 351M46 12/06/90 6.72 METZ BAKING CO BREAD 27- 4624- 663 -66 5511 351M46 12/06/90 14.68 METZ BAKING CO BREAD 27- 4624 - 663 -66 5511 351M46 12/06/90 24.20 METZ BAKING CO COST /GOODS SOLD 28- 4624 - 703 -70 45.60 kkkk *k - kkk -CKS 351M51 12/05/90 468.00 MIDWEST WIRE & STEEL POSTS 10- 4504- 318 -30 47494 1650 468.00 kkkkkk *** -CKS 351M68 12/04/90 21.06 MN CELLULAR PHONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226- 420 -42 351M68 12/04/90 17.60 MN CELLULAR PHONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226- 420 -42 351M68 12/04/90 41.94 MN CELLULAR PHONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 351M6.8 12/04/90 145.84 MN CELLULAR PHONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226- 420 -42 351M68 12/04/90 16.57 MN CELLULAR PHONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 351M68 12/04/90 29.21 MN CELLULAR PHONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 351M68 12/04/90 59.87 MN CELLULAR PHONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 351M68 12/04/90 19.20 MN CELLULAR PHONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 351M68 12/04/90 7.13 MN CELLULAR PHONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 358.42 * kkkkkk kkk -CKS 351M70 12/11/90 188.00 MN. CONWAY HOSE 10- 4901 - 440 -44 16917 1046 188.00 * kkkkkk ** *-CKS 351M73 12/11/90 91.10 MN. ELEVATOR SERVICE CONTRACT 30- 4288 - 782 -78 110400 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 12 -17 -90 PAGE 23 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 91.10 351M74 12/06/90 7,000.00 METRO ELECTRIC ELECT RECONSTR 10 -4201- 500 -50 5686 -T 1186 7,000.00 351M75 12/11/90 18.33 MN VIETNAM VET ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 822 -82 351M75 12/11/90 18.33 MN VIETNAM VET ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 842 -84 351M75 12/11/90 18.34 MN VIETNAM VET ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 862 -86 55.00 351M76 12/05/90 204.53 MN. GLOVE GLOVES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 50411 1722 204.53 * * * *** * ** -CKS 351M80 12/10/90 81.12 MN SUBURBAN NEWS AD FOR BIDS 10- 4210 - 140 -14 89451 351M80 12/10/90 231.25 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ORD 171A34 10- 4210 - 140 -14 89448 351M80 12/10/90 21.25 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ORD 171 -A35 10- 4210 - 140 -14 89449 351M80 12/10/90 .143.75 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ORD 825 -A38 _ 10- 4210 - 140 -14 89450 351M80 12/04/90 51.00 MN SUBURBAN NEWS ADVERTISING 23- 4214 - 611 -61 128522 351M80 12/11/90 1,682.00 MN SUBURBAN NEWS PRINTING 30- 4600 - 781 -78 25330 5283. 2,210.37 * * * * ** * *. -CKS 351M88 12/04/90 24.00 MOBILE CELLULAR UNL. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 470 -47 112790 24.00 * ** -CKS 351M90 12/05/90 2,615.00 MODEL STONE CO. CONCRETE 10- 4528 - 314 -30 104137 7098 351M90 12/05/90 2,541.25 MODEL STONE CO. CONCRETE 10- 4528- 314 -30 104845 5,156.25 * * * * ** * ** -CKS. 351M92 12/11/90 3.90 MONARCH MARKETING TAG MACHINE 50- 4516 - 860 -86 661099 3.90 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 351NO3 12/04/90 780.00 MPLS SEWER & WATER SERVICE REPAIR 40- 4248 - 803 -80 20960 1878 780.00 * * * ** * ** CKS 351N16 12/10/90 67.48 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 330 -30 351N16 12/11/90 321.97 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 540 -54 351N16 12/11/90 463.54 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 540 -54 351N16 12/11/90 302.49 NSP POWER /LIGHT 10- 4252 - 646 =64 351N16 12/06/90 46.04 NSP POWER /LIGHT 40- 4252 - 801 -80 1,201.52 * * * * ** ** *_CKS .. 35A N68 12/10/90 81.00 NORTHSTAR ICE ICE 50- 4632 - 822 -82 1990 CITY O OF EDINA CHECK NO. D DATE VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 181.98 NORTHSTAR ICE MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 234.90 NORTHSTAR ICE ICE 50- 4632 - 862 -86 497.88 * * ** -CKS 1,036.71 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES 10- 4616 - 560 -56 1,036.71 * * ** -CKS 65.04 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 178917 1822 65.04 * * ** -CKS 20.00 MN. AMVETS NEWS ADVERTISING 50- 4214- 822 -82 20.00 MN. AMVETS NEWS ADVERTISING 50- 4214- 842 -84 20.00 MN. AMVETS NEWS ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 862 -86 60.00 * * ** -CKS 76.00 MINN COMM PAGING SERVICE CONTRACT 30- 4288 - 781 -78 303430 76.00 * * ** -CKS - -- -- -23-48------ --- NAOMI- 40HNSON_._.___ -- .-GENERAL SUP PLIES.____. ._._ --23- 4504. - .6.12.861.._ -_ -. 10.07 NAOMI JOHNSON GENERAL SUPPLIES 23- 4504 - 612 -61 48.00 NAOMI JOHNSON GENERAL SUPPLIES 23- 4504 - 613 -b1 89.33 NAOMI JOHNSON CRAFT SUPPLIES 23- 4588 - 611 -61 13--62- -- -- - P1A8h4� -aAH# SAN -- - - - -62- 2 ---- NAG?4"GMNSAN— — - GOMMAD -I- DES- AG--- - --=C-4624-61a ,246.22 * * ** -CKS 342.00 OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING 10- 4600- 420 -42 31253 2013 342.00 * * ** -CKS 192.00 OLSON CHAIN & CABLE TREE TOOLS 10- 4580- 644 -64 105825 1994 192.00 * 408.00 BILL OLSON BLACK DIRT /PICKUP 10- 4562 - 643 -64 408.00 * * ** -CKS 293.81 OWENS SERVICE CO SERVICE CONTRACT 30- 4288 - 780 -78 51881 683.79 OWENS SERVICE CO SERVICE CONTRACTS 30- 4288 - 782 -78 51779 2056 977.60 * * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 12 -17 -90 PAGE 25 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 351056 12/11/90 414.00 OZALID CORP MAINT AGREEMENT 10- 4570 - 260 -26 8390 414.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 351P11 12/06/90 100.00 PARK NIC MED CTR EXAM 10- 4246- 420 -42 100.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 351P24 12/05/90 151.38 PBE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 1660 351P24 12/04/90 72.86 PBE CHAMBERS 10- 4540- 560 -56 1759 351P24 12/05/90 18.88 PBE ADAPTERS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 1660 243.12 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 351P28 12/10/90 290.82 PLANT EQUIP INC REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 12944 1742 290.82 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 351P30 12/11/90 53.45 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING PEPSI 50- 4632- 822 -82 351P30 12/10/90 232.49 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING MIX 50- 4632 - 842 -84 351P30 12/11/90 216.36 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING PEPSI 50- 4632 - 862 -86 502.30 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 351P35 12/04/90 30.00 PETERSON- BARBARA PRO SERVICES 30- 4201 - 781 -78 351P35 12/11/90 25.00 PETERSON- BARBARA POSTAGE 30- 4290 - 781 -78 351P35 12/11/90 16.31 PETERSON- BARBARA GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 781 -78 351P35 12/04/90 21.67 PETERSON- BARBARA GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 781 -78 351P35 12/11/90 20.51 PETERSON- BARBARA GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504- 783 -78 351P35 12/04/90 13.14 PETERSON- BARBARA OFFICE SUPLLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 351P35 12/10/90 53.95 PETERSON- BARBARA OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 180.58 351P36 12/11/90 20.53 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 01 -1340- 132 -12 351P36 12/11/90 23.90 PETTY CASH PARKING 10- 4202 - 140 -14 351P36 12/11/90 20.00 PETTY CASH PARKING 10- 4202 - 490 -49 351P36 12/11/90 5.00 PETTY CASH NATORY 10- 4204 - 140 -14 351P36 12/11/90 35.00 PETTY CASH. SEMINARS 10- 4204 - 490 -49 351P36 12/11/90 27.50 PETTY CASH MTG EXP 10- 4206 - 140 -14 351P36 12/11/90 48.37 PETTY CASH MTG EXP 10- 4206 - 160 -16 351P36 12/11/90 17.00 PETTY CASH MTG EXP 10- 4206 - 200 -20 351P36 12/11/90 3.60 PETTY CASH MTG EXP 10- 4206 - 500 -50 351P36 12/11/90 12.75 PETTY CASH MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 140 -14 351P36 12/11/90 4.00 PETTY CASH MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 160 -16 351P36 12/11/90 2.29 PETTY CASH MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 180 -18 351P36 12/11/90 4.15 PETTY CASH MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 480 -48 351P36 12/11/90 25.00 PETTY CASH POSTAGE 10- 4290 - 510 -51 351P36 12/11/90 22.72 PETTY CASH GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 140 -14 351P36 12/11/90 19.43 PETTY CASH GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 160 -16 1990 CITY OF EDINA * ** -CKS CHECK REGISTER 1669 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 351P36 12/11/90 39.54 PETTY CASH GENERAL SUPPLIES 351P36 12/11/90 13.60 PETTY CASH GENERAL SUPPLIES 351P36 12/11/90 8.68 PETTY CASH GENERAL SUPPLIES 351P36 12/11/90 30.19 PETTY CASH GENERAL SUPPLIES 351P36 12/11/90 14.12 PETTY CASH SUPPLIE 351P36 12/11/90 15.05 PETTY CASH REPAIRS 351P36 12/11/90 54.45 PETTY CASH REPAIRS 466.87 * * * * * ** 351P46 12/05/90 72.50 PIONEER RIM & WHEEL CLAMP 72.50 * * * * * ** 351P58 12/06/90 28.50 PLUNKETTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 28.50 * 351P75 12/10/90 80.00 PREMIER OUTDOOR SERV SERVICE CONTRACT 80.00 * * * * * ** 351P78 12/10/90 360.00 PRINTERS SERV INC BLADE SHARPENING 351P78 12/10/90 65.00 PRINTERS SERV INC BLADE SHARPENING 425.00 * * * * * ** 351P84 12/06/90 8.00 PRO INSTANT PRINT CARDS PRINTED 8.00 * * * * * ** 351020 12/05/90 153.90 QUICK SERV BATTERY FILTERS 351Q20 12/05/90 19.50 QUICK SERV BATTERY REPAIR PARTS 173.40 * * * * * ** 351R01 12/04/90 29.00 R &R SPECIALTIES INC REPAIRS * * * * ** 29.00 * 351R12 12/04/90 11.25 RADIO SHACK ACCT REC GENERAL SUPPLIES 351R12 12/04/90 14.36 RADIO SHACK ACCT REC REPAIR PARTS 25.61 * * * * * ** 351R21 12/11/90 192.85 RED WING SHOES SHOES 12 -17 -90 PAGE 26 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4504- 180 -18 10- 4504 - 200 -20 10- 4504 - 490 -49 10- 4504 - 520 -52 10- 4802 - 600 -60 28- 4248 - 702 -70 28- 4248 - 704 -70 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 1669 39300 * ** -CKS 28- 4504 - 702 -70 187233 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 38219 * ** -CKS 30- 4288 - 782 -78 1399 37422 1638 * ** -CKS 28- 4274 - 704 -70 56811 2021 * ** -CKS 28- 4274 - 704 -70 56714 1936 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 490 -49 39300 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 38219 1561 10- 4540 - 560 -56 37422 1638 * ** -CKS 28- 4248 - 704 -70 13766 1936 * ** -CKS 10- 4504- 420 -42 027062 10- 4540 - 520 -52 27330 1591 * ** -CKS 10- 4262 - 646 -64 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 351R21 12/11/90 166.40 RED WING SHOES SHOES 359.25 * 351R22 12/06/90 168.40 REM SUPPLIES FLOODING SUPPLIES 351R22 12/11/90 455.20 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 351R22 12/11/90 337.50 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 961.10 * kkkkk k 351R25 12/05/90 32.95 RENTAL EQUIP & SALES REPAIRS k 32.95 * * k k k k 351R33 12/11/90 3,915.20 REX DISTR. BEER 351R33 12/11/90 4,372.00 REX DISTR. BEER 351R33 12/11/90 4,674.95 REX DISTR. BEER 12,962.15 * kkkkk 351R49 12/05/90 25.15 ROAD RESCUE LAMP 351R49 12/05/90 79.63 ROAD RESCUE RELAY 104.78 * kkkkkk 351R51 12/04/90 252.19 RFG PET & SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 252.19 * kkkkkk 351R53 12/05/90 45.30 ROBERT B. HILL SALT 45.30 * kkkkkk 351R69 12/05/90 217.74 ROSLAND MEETING EXPENSES 217.74 * kkkkkk 351R79 12/10/90 42.50 RTW INC. FEE FOR SERVICE 42.50 * kkkkkk 351R81 12/04/90 64.55 RUBENSTEIN & ZIFF CRAFT SUPPLIES 64.55 * kkkkk k 351S25 12/04/90 36.00 . OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC CONCESSIONS 36.00 * 12 -17 -90 PAGE 27 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4504 - 260 -26 10- 4504- 648 -64 1287 2084 30- 4504 - 782 -78 1272 2170 30- 4504- 782 -78 1292 2171 * ** -CKS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 2285 1986 * ** -CKS 50- 4630 - 822 -82 50- 4630- 842 -84 50- 4630 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 110031 1985 10- 4540 - 560 -56 110027 1511 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 470 -47 15926 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 440 -44 26358 5054 * ** -CKS 10- 4206 - 140 -14 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 510 -51 * ** -CKS 23- 4588 - 611 -61 181032 1601 * ** -CKS 28- 4624 - 703 -70 5695 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 12 -17 -90 PAGE 28 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 351527 12/04/90 15.37 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 27- 4540 - 667 -66 55026 1693 15.37 * * ** -CKS 351535 12/04/90 33.95 SOUTHERN VACUUM FLOOR MAINT 50- 4236- 841 -84 4980 10- 4248 - 560 -56 111958 33.95 * 351577 12/04/90 62.06 SUBURBAN 351536 12/10/90 3,885.12 SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO. BEER 50- 4630 - 822 -82 351577 351536 12/10/90 10,975.55 SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO. BEER 50- 4630 - 842 -84 10- 4540 - 560 -56 136070 14,860.67 * 211.02 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 351545 12/04/90 37.11 ST. PAUL BOOK GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 470 -47 11966 351545 12/11/90 17.85 ST. PAUL BOOK BOOK COVERS 10- 4504 - 627 -62 048343 351545 12/10/90 19.50 ST. PAUL BOOK GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504- 803 -80 049435 351578 12/11/90 74.46 * SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP GENERAL * * * * ** 30- 4504 - 782 -78 1945 351578 12/11/90 * ** -CKS 351550 12/05/90 100.00 JOHN SHEPARD POLICE SERVICES 10- 4100 - 430 -42 1945 351578 100.00 * 10.49 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP * * * * ** 30- 4504 - 782 -78 1364 351578 * ** -CKS 351554 12/06/90 14.94 STAR TRIBUNE WANT ADS 10- 4212 - 510 -51 30- 4540 - 782 -78 1945 14.94 * 12/10/90 14.70 SUBURBAN PLUMB * * * * ** * ** -CKS 351577 12/04/90 141.26 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR WORK 10- 4248 - 560 -56 111958 351577 12/04/90 62.06 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 135826 351577 12/04/90 7.70 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET PULLEY 10- 4540 - 560 -56 136070 211.02 351578 12/04/90 32.78- SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP CREDIT 10- 4540 - 560 -56 351578 12/11/90 26.60 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP PLUMBING PARTS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 2001 351578 12/11/90 4.72 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 1945 351578 12/11/90 61.05- SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP CREDIT 30- 4504 - 782 -78 1945 351578 12/11/90 10.49 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP PLUG 30- 4504 - 782 -78 1364 351578 12/04/90 •172.22 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP REPAIR PARTS 30- 4540 - 782 -78 1945 351578 12/10/90 14.70 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 803 -80 1755 351578 12/10/90 18.42 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504- 803 -80 1755 351578 12/10/90 120.03 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 803 -80 9913 351578 12/10/90 36.57 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 803 -80 1752 351578 12/10/90 294.92 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 1728 604.84 " * * * * ** ** *-CKS 351592 12/10/90 146.89 SYSTEM SUPPLY COMPUTER SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 110582 1928 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 351592 12/11/90 82.01 SYSTEM SUPPLY PAPER 228.90 * * * * ** 351596 12/11/90 90.00 AMY SMITH CLEANING 90.00 351T05 12/06/90 665.00- THE PRINT SHOP NEWSLETTER 351T05 12/06/90 665.60 THE PRINT SHOP NEWSLETTER 351T05 12/06/90 665.00 THE PRINT SHOP NEWSLETTER 665.60 * * * * ** 351T08 12/10/90 31.96 TARGET SUPPLIES 351T08 12/10/90 575.43 TARGET SUPPLIES 351T08 12/10/90 199.73 TARGET SUPPLIES 807.12 351T09 12/05/90 258.00 T.I.P.S. SERVICES 258.00 * * * * ** 351T11 12/06/90 330.00 TESSMAN SEED INC GRASS SEED 351T11 12/04/90 83.00 TESSMAN SEED INC GRASS SEED 413.00 * * * * ** 351T13 12/06/90 330.00 TOM HORWATH FORESTRY 351T13 12/06/90 360.00 TOM HORWATH INSPECTIONS 351T13 12/06/90 53.04 TOM HORWATH MILEAGE 743.04 * * * * ** 351T19 12/06/90 993.00 THE PIRKL ASSOC. CONSTRUCTION 993.00 * * * * ** 351T26 12/05/90 265.10 THERMAL CO REPAIR PARTS 265.10 * * * * * ** 351T29 12/06/90 11,173.87 THOMSEN - NYBECK PROSECUTION 11,173.87 * 351T30 12/11/90 8,620.65 THORPE DISTR. BEER 8,620.65 * 12 -17 -90 PAGE 29 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4504 - 510 -51 120263 * ** -CKS 27- 4201 - 662 -66 30610 1462 *** -CKS 10- 4504- 628 -62 15291 1788 10- 4504 - 628 -62 15291 1788 10- 4504 - 628 -62 15291 1788 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 420 -42 30- 4504 - 782 -78 50- 4632 - 862 -86 50- 4201 - 821 -82 1105 * ** -CKS 10- 4568 - 643 -64 71040 1090 10- 4568 - 643 -64 70725 1723 * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 644 -64 10- 4201 - 980 -64 10 -4208- 644 -64 * ** -CKS 27- 1300 - 003 -00 * ** -CKS 30- 4540 - 782 -78 R47037 1145 **A-CKS 10- 4201 - 220 -22 50- 4630 - 862 -86 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION R R R R R 351T66 12/04/90 22.48 TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT CRAFT SUPPLIES 22.48 R R R R R R 351T86 12/04/90 58.80 TWIN CITY FILTER REPAIR FILTER 58.80 R R R R R R 351T88 12/11/90 71.96 TWIN CITY HOME JUICE MIX 71.96 R R R R R R 351U08 12/11/90 4,444.85 UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 351U08 12/11/90 54.87- UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 4,389.98 * R R R R R R 351U14 12/06/90 178.59 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP BULBS 178.59 * R R R R R k 351U20 12/04/90 135.00 UNIVERSITY OF MN CONT ED 135.00 * RRRRRR 351U25 12/11/90 36.00 UNIVERSAL MED SERV OXYGEN 36.00 * R R R R R R 351V10 12/04/90 268.62 VISIONS ENERGY RES LP FUEL 268.62 * RRR * R R 351V30 12/11/90 48.51 VANTAGE ELECTRIC CONSTRUCTION 351V30 12/11/90 485.12 VANTAGE ELECTRIC CONSTRUCTION 351V30 12/11/90 48.51- VANTAGE ELECTRIC CONSTRUCTION 485.12 R R R R R R 351W08 12/11/90 344.86 W.W. GRAINGER COMPRESSOR 351W08 12/04/90 29.40 W.W. GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 374.26 R R R R R R 12 -17 -90 PAGE 30 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 23- 4588 - 611 -61 409140 1819 * ** -CKS 28- 4248 - 704 -70 12501 1944 * ** -CKS 50- 4632 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS 10- 4266- 420 -42 10- 4266- 430 -42 * ** -CKS 27- 4504 - 662 -66 1780 * ** -CKS 10- 4202 - 420 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4510 - 440 -44 761298 5805 * ** -CKS 28- 4612- 704 -70 * ** -CKS 23- 1300 - 001 -00 11367 2418 23- 1300 - 001 -00 11367 2418 23 -1300- 001 -00 11367 2418 * ** -CKS 10- 4504- 180 -18 2043 27- 4540 - 667 -66 1702 * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 351W15 12/05/90 * * * * ** WALTER JOHNSON 351W28 12/10/90 351W28 12/10/90 * R * * R * 351W35 12/11/90 REPAIR CLAMPS 180.00 351W52 12/05/90 351W66 12/04/90 * * * * ** 166.26 351W92 12/05/90 166.26 * * ** -CKS 351X05 12/04/90 * * * * ** POLICE SERVICES 351Z05 12/11/90 351Z05 12/04/90 * * * * ** PARTS * ** -CKS CHECK REGISTER PAGE 31 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 100.00 WALTER JOHNSON POLICE SERVICES 100.00 * * ** -CKS 40- 4504 - 803 -80 132.40 WATER PRODUCTS REPAIR CLAMPS 180.00 WATER PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 312.40 * * ** -CKS 10- 4208 - 600 -60 166.26 WEIGLE -SUE MILEAGE 166.26 * * ** -CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 100.00 WILLIAM WALSH POLICE SERVICES 100.00 * * ** -CKS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 462.20 WILLIAMS STEEL PARTS 462.20 * * ** -CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 100.00 WROBLESKI -HENRY POLICE SERVICE 100.00 * * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 160 -16 41.30 XEROX CORP BUDGET PREP 41.30 * * ** -CKS 27- 4504 - 667 -66 50.25 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE FIRST AID SUPPLIES 125.60 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE GENERAL SUPPLIES 175.85 * 20.53 FUND O1 TOTAL 141,433.32 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 15,389.00 FUND 11 TOTAL C.D.B.G. 1,118.30 FUND 12 TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS 9,568.44 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER 2,237.14 FUND 25 TOTAL CAPITAL FUND 21,190.59 FUND 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND 11,486.39 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND 19,085.47 FUND 30 TOTAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 14,239.45 FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND 5,057.46 FUND 41 TOTAL STORM SEWER UTILITY 98,894.56 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 408,241.94 FUND 60 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION FUND * ** -CKS 12 -17 -90 PAGE 31 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 40- 4504 - 803 -80 180138 1709 40- 4540 - 803 -80 183790 1896 * ** -CKS 10- 4208 - 600 -60 * ** -CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 1640 * ** -CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 160 -16 * ** -CKS 27- 4504 - 667 -66 2185 30- 4504 - 782 -78 * ** -CKS 1990 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 747,962.59 VENDOR TOTAL CHECK REGISTER 12 -17 -90 PAGE 32 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE