Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-02-04_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA • EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 4, 1991 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL - HRA & COUNCIL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS - Adoption of Consent Agenda Items is made by the Commissioners-as to the HRA items and by the - Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are Consent Agenda Items and are are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner or Council Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in "its normal sequence on the agenda. EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF BRA MEETING OF JANUARY 22, 1991 II. AWARD OF BID - CENTENNIAL LAKES MAINTENANCE FACILITY - MECHANICAL WORK * III. PAYMENT'OF HRA CLAIMS IV. ADJOURNMENT OF HRA EDINA CITY COUNCIL * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of Regular Meetings of November 19 and December 3, 1990 II. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS A. Dr. Joyce Anderson, 7121 Glouchester Avenue. III. AWARD OF BIDS * A. Improvement No. LS -11 - Lift Station Remodeling (Continue to 2/19/91) * B. (2) Fairway Mowers - Braemar Golf Course * C. 1/2 Ton Cargo Van - Park Department * D. (2) Defibrillators * E. (6) Golf Cars IV. REPORTS-AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Temporary Conditional Use Permits B. Tax Forfeit.Land Proposal - Dewey Hill Eastland West Condominiums, Cahill of Edina Townhomes C. Strong Beer/Wine License Discussion . D. Wildlife Committee Report E. 1990 Census Population Counts F. Appointments to Advisory Boards /Commissions /Committees G. Appointment to The Edina Foundation Board H. Strategic Planning Meeting Date - 3/9/91 * I. 1991 Public Health Nursing Contract * J. Apartment Recycling Report V. RESOLUTIONS Favorable rollcall vote by majority of quorum to pass. * A. Assignment of Securities in Lieu of Bond 1. First Bank National Association - Edina Office 2. Marquette Bank Minneapolis- _ Agenda Edina City Council February 4, 1991 Page 2 VI. ,INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES VII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL VIII. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS A. Smoking policy IX. FINANCE * A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 02/04/91: Total $385,278.76 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Mon Feb 18 PRESIDENTS DAY - CITY HALL CLOSED Tues Feb 19 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Mon Mar 4 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Tues Mar 12 Annual Council /Advisory Boards Dinner Meeting '6:00 p.m. Braemar Clubhouse Mon Mar 18 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Mon Apr 1 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Mon Apr 15 Regular Council Meeting- 7:00 p.m. Council Room Mon Apr 22 Board of Review 5:00 p.m. Council Room Tues Apr 23 Annual Volunteers Reception 5:00 p.m. Edinborough Park MINUTES EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JANUARY 22, 1991 Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Chairman Richards. MINUTES of the Joint /HRA Council Meeting of January 7, 1991, were approved as submitted by motion of Commissioner Rice, seconded by Commissioner Smith. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus,.Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. PAYMENT OF HRA CLAIMS APPROVED Gordon Hughes, Executive Director explained that the HRA claims payment system had been converted to the_LOGIS system, which breaks HRA items out and will now be presented under the HRA portion of the agenda. Mr. Hughes recommended authorizing payment of the claims. Commissioner Smith made a motion for payment of HRA claims as shown in detail on the check register dated 01/15/91 and consisting of one page: Total $115,206.28. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Rice., Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. There being no further business on the HRA agenda, motion of Commissioner Kelly was seconded by Commissioner Smith for adjournment. Motion carried unanimously. Executive Director 9ti1.tA.l 4 `J \� °�' REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: HRA FROM: GORDON L. HUGHES VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00 DATE: FEBRUARY 4, 1991. AGENDA ITEM HRA II. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Company Amount of Quote or E§d 1. GILBERT MECHANICAL 1. 27,700 2. .- DAYTON BLUFF 2. 29,970 3. PAVAN MECHANICAL 3. 30,600 4, BLAINE HEATING 4. 32,990 5. BOWLER MECHANICAL 5. 33,226 RECOMMENDED, QUOTE OR END: GILBERT MECHANICAL GENERAL INFORMATION: " The proposed project covers all heating, ventilation, and other mechanical systems for the Centennial Lakes maintenance/ storage area. ADMINISTRATION Signature V Department The Recommended bid is within budget not within get hn Wallin, Kenneth Rosland, City Manat Director 1991 CITY OF EDINA HRA CHECK NO. DATE 035700 01/30/91 035701 01/30/91 035702 01/30/91 035702 01/30/91 035702 01/30/91 035703 01/30/91 035704 01/30/91 035705 01/.30/91 035706 01/30/91 035707 01/30/91 * * * * ** TAMARACK 02 -04 -91 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 01- 3140 - 131 -12 01 -3140- 131 -12 01- 1390 - 132 -12 01- 1390 - 132 -12 01- 1390 - 132 -12 01- 1390 - 132 -12 01- 1340 - 132 -12 01- 4000 - 134 -12 01- 1319 - 131 -12 01- 1319 - 132 -12 APPROM fM PAYMOT, ' CHECK REGISTER - DATED , - PAGES THROUGH - 1 * * * -CKS CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 4.00 NEIL JAHR REFUND 4.00 * 4.00 JAMES M DUNN REFUND 4.00 * 972.00 TAMARACK PARK MAINT AREA 232.84 TAMARACK PAINT /LUMBER 124.25 TAMARACK PARK MAINT AREA 1,329.09 * 825.00 REM SUPPLY PARK MAINT AREA 825.00 * 1,838.46 MERIT SUPPLY EQUIP 1,838.46 * 100.00 THE URBAN LAND DUES 100.00 * 14,949.53 WALKER PARKING ENG FEES 14,949.53 * 1,145.93 BRW ARCH INC ARCH FEE 1,145.93 * 20,196.01 FUND 01 TOTAL FUND HRA 20,196.01 TOTAL 02 -04 -91 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 01- 3140 - 131 -12 01 -3140- 131 -12 01- 1390 - 132 -12 01- 1390 - 132 -12 01- 1390 - 132 -12 01- 1390 - 132 -12 01- 1340 - 132 -12 01- 4000 - 134 -12 01- 1319 - 131 -12 01- 1319 - 132 -12 APPROM fM PAYMOT, ' CHECK REGISTER - DATED , - PAGES THROUGH - 1 * * * -CKS MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL NOVEMBER 19, 1990 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor Richards. EPILEPSY MONTH PROCLAIMED Mayor Richards read the following proclamation which was adopted unanimously: PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, there are more than 100,000 Minnesotans with some form of epilepsy; and WHEREAS, epilepsy is the second most common neurological disfunction or physical impairment, not a disease but a disorder of the nervous system; and WHEREAS,,sixty percent of those persons who have epilepsy are elementary school children or younger which is approximately one child in every second classroom; and WHEREAS, early diagnosis and attention to the social and neurological aspects of epilepsy will afford people better control; and WHEREAS, there continues to be a need for improved education and more information regarding public attitudes toward understanding and accepting those'persons with epilepsy. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that I, Frederick S. Richards, Mayor of the City of Edina, do hereby proclaim the month of November as EPILEPSY MONTH IN THE CITY OF EDINA and encourage the residents of our City to increase their awareness of the needs of those who have epilepsy. PROCLAIMED this 19th day of November, 1990. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented,vith the exception of removal of item IV.E - 50th and France Seasonal Banners. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A38 - TO PROVIDE FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS TO ALLOW CERTAIN HOME OCCUPATIONS BY HANDICAPPED RESIDENTS ADOPTED ON SECOND READING Planner Larsen recalled that the Council had granted First Reading to Ordinance No. 825 -A38 - To Provide for Conditional Use Permits to Allow Certain Home Occupations by Handicapped Residents at its meeting of November 5, 1990 subject to certain revisions. He presented and explained the following changes:' 1) The amendment has been revised to provide for City Council review after one year, with notice, and thereafter every second year. The ordinance provides for a review and not renewal. The Council would review to determine if conditions of the permit are being observed. If they are not, the Council could order a revocation of the permit. The word "renewal" has been eliminated because it conflicts with language in the state statute. 2) Presently the amendment provides for permits by residents who are "physically unable to be fully employed" outside the residence. Staff would suggest this phrase be changed.to read "unable to be employed full time outside one's residence." This phrase is more definite and more easily understood. 3) The sentence added at the end of the "Purpose" paragraph would clarify that handicapped persons did not have to go through the conditional use permit process if they otherwise complied with the customary home occupation conditions. 4) Paragraph 4(c), relating to conditions, and paragraph 5, relating to review of permits, have been entirely rewritten. Paragraph 5 does not now provide for expiration and renewal of the permit, but instead provides"that the Council shall f review each permit periodically to see'if the conditions under which the permit was given are still being complied with. If they are not, then the Council may direct the City Manager to proceed with revocation of the permit pursuant to paragraph'H of Section 4. Paragraph H provides that notice is given to the violators and they have a time stated in the notice to cure any violation. If it is not cured, the matter is submitted to the City Council for hearing and the Council may, at such hearing or continuation thereof, revoke the permit. This paragraph has been set up using wording in the state statute regarding duration of a permit. 5) Paragraph (b) (ii) under Section 4. Conditions and Findings provides for a maximum number of automobile trips per week to the dwelling unit by individuals other than the residents thereof generated by the home occupation. Planner Larsen said staff and the City Attorney would recommend approval of Second Reading and adoption of the ordinance amendment as now presented. Public Comment Michael Patera, 7120 Glouchester Avenue, stated that he agreed with the recommendation to eliminate the term "fully employed ". He said he would like to dispel two things: (i) it has been published and suggested that he is against the proposed ordinance amendment which is untrue; (ii) that this ordinance amendment deals with a neighborhood problem. The amendment would be applied city -wide and it should be addressed 'as such. Mr. Patera said he assumed that this amendment is for extra - ordinary relief from otherwise reasonable zoning requirements. What this does is contrary to most present handicapped legislation. The focus has been to integrate handicapped individuals into society as opposed to isolating them in their homes. Also, because it is an exception to the zoning ordinance it of necessity results in erosion to a certain degree. The threshold criteria "fully employed" creates an erosion without a concomit and showing of need. The phrase is an initial qualifier for any applicant, is definitional, and is the yardstick against which any applicant will be measured. "Fully employed" is much broader than the stated purpose. It does not distinguish between those presently productive and gainfully employed and those who are not. According to the present standard. "fully employed ", a person who is productive and gainfully employed outside the home can move the business home because that person might not be fully employed. He argued that the way the ordinance is presently drafted it would give concessions to a class of persons without a proper showing of need. You can be fully employed outside the home in some fashion and but then get a physician to certify that you can be more fully employed at home. Mayor Richards asked Mr. Pratera if he had precise language for 4.(c)(i) that he would propose be considered rather than what is in the present draft. As alternative language to "fully employed ", Mr. Pratera offered the wording "to remain productive and gainfully employed ". Harold Bagley, 7113 Glouchester Avenue, addressed the last comment of Mr. Pratera, and said that would'create a problem because there is no standard. If someone worked ten hours a week outside the home one could argue they are gainfully employed. The wording "on a full time basis" as suggested by the Planner is more easily understood. The reason the Planning Commission had suggested "fully employed" was to allow a little more breath to the concept - to give the disabled person the ability to make use of all their talents. Maybe they could work at a job outside their home and create some income, but maybe they are talented at some other job that they could only do in the home. Mr. Bagley said he also had trouble with'the term describing the ordinance as extra - ordinary relief. The ordinance lists the permitted occupations so this would not be opening up the neighborhood to all kinds of occupations. He also said the procedure was complicated for a disabled person to get a variance to go from ten automobile trips per week to twenty. The ordinance could merely have been amended to simply allow that and not have to get the conditional use permit. He argued that in some home occupation cases it could well be that 40 trips a week is not unreasonable. Mayor Richards reminded Mr. Bagley that the focus should be on the underlying zoning as it relates to land use. Member Smith then moved Second Reading of Ordinance No. 825A -38 as presented except that the language-be amended to insert the phrase "unable to be employed full time outside one's residence" instead of "to be fully employed ", and moved adoption as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A38 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825) TO PROVIDE FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS TO ALLOW CERTAIN HOME OCCUPATIONS BY HANDICAPPED RESIDENTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Paragraph D (Customary Home Occupations as an Accessory Use) of Section 7 (General Requirements Applicable to All Districts Except as Otherwise Stated) of Ordinance No. 825 is hereby amended by adding a new subparagraph as follows: "4. Permitted customary home occupations by residents who are physically unable to be employed full time outside'their residence may be allowed as a temporary conditional use, with variances from the conditions of subparagraph l of this paragraph D. pursuant to the provisions of paragraph I of Section 4 (Administration and Procedures) of this ordinance." Sec. 2. Section 4 (Administration and Procedures) is hereby amended by adding a new paragraph I as follows: "I. Temporary Conditional Use Permits. 1. EMose. The purpose of temporary conditional use permits is to allow handicapped residents of dwelling units to conduct and operate permitted customary home occupations in their residence by means of such variances.from the conditions otherwise imposed by this ordinance on such occupation as the Council deems necessary and appropriate to allow such persons to properly conduct and operate such occupation from their residence. The Council hereby finds and determines that it is in the best interests of the City and its citizens to provide a process and means by which handicapped persons can carry on home occupations from their residence and thereby become or remain productive and gainfully employed, and that'the granting of conditional use permits pursuant to this paragraph I will promote the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City, and its citizens.' However, handicapped residents who do not need variances from conditions imposed by this.ordinance on customary home occupations need not, and are not required to, obtain a conditional use permit pursuant to this paragraph I. 2. Conditional Use Provisions Anly. All the provisions of paragraphs D and H of this Section 4 relative to the issuance of conditional use permits shall apply to temporary conditional use permits issued pursuant to this paragraph I. except as specifically changed by this paragraph I. 3. Applications and Notice. (a) An application for a temporary conditional use permit may be initiated by the occupant of the residence from which the home occupation is to be conducted, whether such occupant is an owner or a lessee of the residence. (b) The application for a temporary conditional use permit shall be accompanied by the following additional information: I . (i) a letter (which shall be dated not earlier than 30 days prior to the date of the application) from the applicant's attending physician (who shall be duly licensed to practice medicine in Minnesota) certifying that the applicant is physically unable to be employed full time outside of the applicant's residence; (ii) the.specific home occupation proposed by the applicant, including the expected number of weekly automobile trips to the dwelling unit by individuals other than the residents thereof expected to be generated by the home occupation, the number of hours per day and the number of days per week the home occupation will operate; .(iii) any proposed interior or exterior alterations to the dwelling unit necessary due to the proposed home occupation; and (iv) any other information required, in the opinion of the Planner, to evaluate the application, to determine consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, and insure compliance with the requirements contained in this ordinance and other applicable City ordinances. (c) The erection of a sign shall not be required in connection with the application for a temporary conditional use permit. (d) Notice of hearing before the Council shall be published and mailed as provided in subparagraph 5 of paragraph D of this Section 4 except that mailed notice shall be given only to owners of property situated wholly or partly within 350 feet of the property to which the application relates. 4. Conditions and Findings. (a) 'In order to grant a temporary conditional use permit the Council must make the same findings as set forth in subparagraph 5 of paragraph D of this Section 4. (b) In.order to grant a temporary conditional use permit, the Council must also find that the proposed home occupation complies with the conditions of subparagraph 1 of paragraph D of Section 7 of this ordinance, provided, however, that:. (i) the Council may grant a variance of any condition in subparagraph 1 of paragraph D of said Section 7, if deemed necessary by the Council to permit the applicant to properly operate and conduct the proposed home occupation and if(the Council finds that such use will not negate or violate any of the findings to be made pursuant to subparagraph 5 of paragraph D of this Section 4; (ii) the maximum number of automobile trips to the dwelling unit of the applicant by individuals other than the residents thereof generated as a result of.such home occupation may be increased by the.Council from ten per week to a maximum of twenty per week -in connection with the granting of such permit. (c) Any permit granted pursuant to this.paragraph I shall remain in effect, if not earlier terminated under other provisions of this - ordinance, only so long as the following conditions are observed and complied with: (i) that the applicant occupy the dwelling unit described in the permit, and then only so long as such applicant is physically unable to be employed full time outside of the applicant's residence; (ii) that the findings made by the Council as set forth in subparagraph 5 of paragraph D of this Section 4 continue without change or violation; and (iii) that the conditions of subparagraph l of paragraph D of Section 7 of this ordinance, as varied by variances granted by the Council, are not violated. 5. Duration and Review of Permits. (a) Each permit issued pursuant to this paragraph I shall remain in effect only so long as the conditions set out in subparagraph 4(c) of this paragraph I are observed and not violated. (b) The Council shall review each permit issued pursuant to this paragraph I on the first anniversary of the effective date of the permit and on each second anniversary (i.e., every other year) of such effective date thereafter to determine if any of such conditions are not being observed or are being violated. Such review shall be made at a public hearing, notice of which shall be published and mailed in the same manner as notice would then be given under this ordinance for a then new conditional use permit. All persons may be heard, and the Council shall receive such evidence and information as it deems necessary or desirable, orally and in writing, at such hearing and continuations thereof. If, at such hearing, or a continuation thereof, the Council concludes, by resolution, that one or more of the conditions set out in subparagraph 4(c) of this paragraph I are not being observed or are being violated, then the Council may direct the Manager to institute proceedings to revoke the permit as provided in paragraph H of this Section 4. The foregoing provisions shall not prevent the City from esercising.any remedies for violations of any conditions applicable to any conditional use permit whenever they occur. 6. All Districts. Customary home occupations conducted pursuant to temporary conditional use permits issued under this paragraph I shall be allowed as a conditional use in all districts in which dwelling units are allowed. Sec. 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith; Richards Ordinance adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 171 -A35 (ESTABLISHING FEE FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CERTAIN HOME OCCUPATIONS BY HANDICAPPED RESIDENTS) ADOPTED• SECOND READING WAIVED Planner Larsen presented Ordinance No. 171 -A35 and explained that it would provide for a $75.00 application fee for Temporary Conditional Use Permits for handicapped residents as provided in Ordinance No. 815 -A38 previously adopted. Staff would recommend adoption with waiver of Second Reading. Member Rice introduced Ordinance No. 171 -A35 and moved its adoption as follows, with waiver of Second Reading: ORDINANCE NO. 171 -A35 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 171 TO ADD FEE.FOR TEMPORARY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Schedule A to Ordinance No. 171 is hereby amended by adding the following thereto: ORD. SEC. NO. NO. PURPOSE OF FEE /CHARGE AMOUNT FEE NO. 825 4(E)l Temporary Conditional Use Permit .$75.00 29f -a Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage and publication. ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Ordinance adopted. PUBLIC HEARING ON PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR FARRELLS PARKWOOD KNOLLS (5700 BLAKE ROAD) CONTINUED TO 1213/90 Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen presented the request for preliminary plat approval for Farrells Parkwood Knolls at 5700 Blake Road, generally located just north of Vernon Avenue at the corner of Blake Road and South Knoll Drive. Presentation by Planner The subject property is a developed single family lot containing an area of 95,700 square feet, or 2.2 acres. The existing dwelling is located in the central portion of the lot. The lot is adjacent to but is not part of the original Parkwood Knolls development. The Community Development and Planning Commission considered the proposed subdivision at two meetings and has considered three different approaches to the preliminary plat. At its meeting of August 29, 1990, the plat was originally proposed as a three lot plat with new lot lines generally running in a east -west direction. The staff report was written on the three lot proposal. However, at the Planning Commission meeting the proponents presented a revised two lot plat which eliminated the northerly lot. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the revised two lot preliminary plat. Following that meeting the proponents chose not to proceed to the Council with the approved two.lot plat. Instead they decided to return to the Planning Commission meeting of September 26, 1990, with a revised three lot subdivison. The revised three lot plat left the proposed new lot south of the.existing home essentially the same as the earlier proposal. The northerly portion of the proposed plat was now divided east /west as opposed to north /south as in the earlier three lot preliminary plat. This change would allow for a larger front setback from South Knoll Drive on Lot 2. The three existing homes that front on this block of South Knoll have an average setback of 127 feet. Planner Larsen presented graphics showing the proposed three lot plat and the 500 foot neighborhood, consisting of 45 lots, that was used for the size /area comparison. The standards for the neighborhood are lot width of 130 feet, lot depth.of 149 feet and lot area of 20,000 square feet. The proposed lots dimensions are as follows: Lot Width- Lot Depth Lot Area Lot .1 126 240 •32,300 Lot 2 130 205 26,700 Lot 3 108 273 36,700 Lots l and 3 would require a lot width variance. All of the lots comply with or exceed all other size requirements. The property abuts an existing water body. The subdivision ordinance requires a 100 foot conservation easement upland from the ordinary high water mark. That easement has been provided in the preliminary plat. The ordinance also requires that plans be submitted illustrating areas of steep slopes as well as the location of the proposed building pads. The proposed building pads and the setbacks for the homes were pointed out on the graphics. The Planning Commission voted by a 5 to 4 margin to recommend denial of the revised three lot plat. -The lot width variances required for Lots 1 and 3 and the possibility of a need for a front setback variance on Lot 2 were given as reasons. The proponents have decided to proceed to the Council and ask for approval of the revised three lot plat. Presentation by Proponent James Van Valkenburg, stated that he represented the proponents, Jim and Linda Farrell, who own the subject property and that he wished to clarify some of the concerns that were raised at the prior hearings. At the first hearing, the proposal illustrated Lots 1 and 2 with a division line running east /west. Several of the planning commissioners objected because one of the houses would.have to be built on the setback alignment of the existing homes on South Knoll Drive. It was suggested that the Farrells return with the current proposal with a north /south division so that the home on Lot 2. would meet the setback of the other homes in the area as required by the Zoning Ordinance. He pointed out that the Wurst home immediately to the west is setback 125 feet, the next home to the west is 121 feet, and the setback for the proposed plat would be 135 feet. Mr. Van Valkenburg said the current request is for approval of a three lot plat with a north /south division. All of the proposed lots are substantially larger than the 500 foot neighborhood median of 20,000 square feet. The lot width for Lot 1 is shown at 126 feet and would require a 4 foot variance_. Frontage on Blake Road for Lot 3 is shown at 108 feet in width and would also require a variance. An earlier drawing met the 130 lot width requirement for Lot 3 but some of the planning commissioners were concerned about the backyard of Lot 2. To address that concern the lot line was moved to provide more backyard for Lot 2 and not adversely affect Lot 3 because the Farrells intend to build a new home much further to the west and south on Lot 3. The proposed plat illustrates a 100 -foot conservation easement on Lot 3 which will be preserved as the Farrells do not intend to have their new home encroach on that. In conclusion; Mr. Van Valkenburg urged approval of the proposed plat. He observed that they are trying to work with the Wursts immediately to the west. If approved, they would attempt to work out some type of easement to protect the existing trees, to have an setback alignment that would not adversely affect the Wursts, and place some restrictions on Lot 2 to control mass and height of the home to be built thereon. Public Comment Thomas Wurst, 6205 South Knoll Drive, stated that he and his wife own the adjoining property immediately to the west of the Farrell property. He explained that when they purchased their lot the house on the Farrell property was in existence. They were informed that they would have to setback their residence to conform to the existing house. The property immediately to their west also had to conform to the same setback. These are the only three properties on south side of South Knoll Drive between Blake Road and View Lane. He argued that the existing setback alignment should be preserved. Mr.,Wurst recalled that initially the Farrells asked them for their comments on a three lot subdivision. After considering the proposed subdivision, they told the Farrells they would object to three lots for aesthetic and other reasons but would have no objection to the proposed Lot 3. At the first Planning Commission hearing the two lot subdivision was approved. Subsequently, the proponents came back and. asked for approval of a three lot subdivision. Mr. Wurst said they still have the same objections. As to the median size lots in the 500 foot neighborhood to the subject property, Mr. Wurst submitted that the neighborhood contains two separate platted areas. The area on the east side of Blake Road was developed with much smaller lots. The lots in Parkwood Knolls were platted,at a later period with larger lots. Mr. Wurst said he was deeply concerned about the proposed plat, i.e. location of the building pad on Lot 2, location of the driveways, the topography, and the conservation easement for the pond. He concluded by-stating that he would like to see the property maintain the setbacks and aesthetics that are there now. Council Comment Member Rice questioned the feasibility of a driveway for Lot 1 coming off of South Knoll Drive. As to Lot 2, he said he would be concerned that a house on that lot could dominate the neighborhood because of the topography. Member Kelly asked if protective covenants that might be placed on the property A would run with the land. Attorney Erickson opined that they could and thereby protect the adjacent properties.. Mayor Richards commented that he would have a difficult time in supporting the concept of a three -lot subdivision. However, there are some unique characteristics to this property that would justify doing that if other concerns are answered. He said he felt the neighborhood is oriented to the west and that Blake Road is a division between the lots to the east and could be persuasive for a two -lot development. Lot width variances of four feet for Lot land twenty -two feet for Lot 2 would not preclude granting a three -lot subdivision. He suggested this be approached as a planned unit development so that all affected parties would know exactly what would occur. Mayor Richards said he would support a three -lot subdivision provided that there was concurrence as to location of curb cuts, driveways, footprint of buildings, height and mass of buildings, setbacks, vegetation plan for all three lots. The Council Members said they would concur with that concept if those issues would be addressed. Planner Larsen pointed out that the proposed plat has been under consideration for some time and it is approaching the 120 days deadline for action by the Council. Mr. Van Valkenburg, representing the proponents, stated that they would waive the 120 day requirement. Attorney Erickson said such waiver should be in writing and clarified that the Council would have to take action at the December 3, 1990., Council meeting if the requirement was not waived. Member Smith made a motion to continue the hearing on preliminary plat approval for Farrells Parkwood Knolls to December 3, 1990, with a specific proposal for a three -lot subdivision that would address the following issues for all three lots: 1) curb cuts, 2) driveway locations, 3) vegetation plan, 4) building pads, 5) setbacks, 6) massing for Lot 2, and 7) conservation easement for Lot 3. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *BID AWARDED FOR COLLECTION OF GARBAGE/R.EFQSE FROM CITY PROPERTIES Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for collection of garbage /refuse from City properties to recommended low bidder, Aagard Environmental Services, at $5.89 per cubic yard. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR SKID STEER LOADER WITH ATTACHMENTS Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for a skid steer loader with attachments to recommended low bidder, Case Power & Equipment, at $26,765.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR FUEL MONITORING SYSTEM Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for a fuel monitoring system to recommended low bidder, Westside Equipment, at $10,362.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR DRIVING RANGE TRACTOR FOR BRAEREAR GOLF COURSE Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for a driving range tractor for Braemar Golf Course to recommended low bidder, North Star Turf; at $6,015.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. BID AWARDED FOR 50TH AND FRANCE SEASONAL BANNERS In response to questions raised by the Council, Assistant Manger Hughes explained that the bid is for nylon banners to be placed within the new street light and pedestrian light standards at 50th & France. The bids were for banners which have been specifically designed, are warranted for five years, but are expected to last longer. They would be up for approximately two months and their purpose would be to add color during the winter season. The colors were selected by working with a committee of merchants from the 50th &'France commercial area. Christian Johnson, 50th & France Steering Committee, commented that this was the design recommended by the committee'to best fit the season and that they felt the banners were imperative to the whole renovation project. Member Rice asked if the committee is considering banners for other seasons of the year. Assistant Manager Hughes said if these work out well they may consider additional banners. Manager Rosland explained that these were a part of the total budget for the renovation project at 50th & France. By bidding items such as these separately instead of under a general contract there is a cost savings of 10 -20 %. Motion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for 50th & France seasonal banners to recommended low bidder, Banner Creations, at $5,275.00. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINQTES'OF 11/13/90 APPROVED: NO ACTION TAKEN ON REOUEST TO CHANGE HOURS OF LIMITED PARKING IN 50TH & FRANCE RAMPS Chief Craig Swanson explained.that the Traffic Safety Committee had received a request from the 50th and France Business and Professional Association to change "Hours of Limited Parking" signage in the municipal ramps on West 49 1/2 Street and 51st Street. The request was to enforce only the one hour parking areas of the ramps from Thanksgiving through Christmas, but allow parking for unlimited periods in all other signed areas. The Committee's stance was that this would not be consistent with current policies and that any change would have to be made by the Council. The action taken by the Committee was to pass the item on to the City Council for review and possible change by resolution. Christine Johnson spoke on behalf of the 50th & France Board of Directors. At their last meeting they voted to request that the three hour parking, restriction be temporarily suspended. With the variety of shops and services at 50th and France, three hour parking-is not adequate for customers. Ms. Johnson explained that they are reviewing several issues regarding the ramps, i.e. employee parking, customer concerns, etc. This is viewed as a. temporary solution through the holidays until a final plan can be offered to the Council after the first of the year. In response to.question of Member Paulus, Lota Werth, Executive Director of 50th & France Association, said that there are two ways to let people know that there is longer term parking in the ramps: 1) generic advertising for the Association, and 2) additional signage. She said they are up against big odds with unrestricted parking at Southdale, the Galleria and strip malls in the area. They want to remain competitive and also want to make it as attractive as possible for customers to come to the area. They realize that there are parking situation problems because there will probably never be sufficient parking for customers or employees. The Board is attempting to put together a comprehensive parking plan for the next year, including private security to monitor the employee situation. Mayor Richards asked if the Board of Directors had discussed the possible loss of customers because people could park for extended periods of time which could reduce the number of parking spaces available. Ms. Werth said they had considered that aspect. Perry Anderson, merchant, said he was opposed to the temporary non - enforcement of the three hour parking in the 50th & France'ramps. It would encourage other types of long term parking to the detriment of business invitees and merchants who are assessed in the costs of the ramps. It would also eliminate all control of employee parking. Hosmer Brown, property owner at 50th & France, said this was the most difficult issue they have faced and there is not a friendly consensus on the issue. He said he shared many of the concerns of the merchants.and business people at the corner but was not convinced that this would work or be helpful. However, he pointed out that it was recommendation of the Board of Directors and was one attempt to try to find a solution to the parking problem. Following lengthy discussion, Member Rice made a motion to acknowledge receipt of the recommendation of,the 50th and France Business and Professional Association to change the hours of limited parking signage in the municipal ramps of 50th and France and to take no action thereon at this time. Motion was seconded.by Member Smith. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. Member Kelly then moved approval of the following recommended action listed in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of November 13, 1990: 1) To relocate the "SIGNAL YOUR TURN" sign west of the driveway to Point of France, to have the Engineering Department review the site for possible ways to cut a turn lane for westbound traffic into the complex and /or appropriate signing and pass on to City Council, and to recommend to the City Council to pass a resolution to Hennepin County to review the pedestrian safety issues at West 66th Street and France Avenue, and to acknowledge Sections B and C of the Minutes. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards POLICY ADDRESSING ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION BY COACHES /CHAPERONS WHILE TRAVELING WITH CITY SPONSORED YOUTH ATHLETIC EVENTS REFERRED BACK TO COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE Mayor Richards referred to a resolution adopted by the Edina Community Health Services Advisory Committee at. its November 8, 1990, meeting supporting the Edina School District's Strategic Plan. In addition, the Committee recommended that the City of Edina adopt a policy prohibiting the consumption of alcohol by coaches and chaperons while traveling with City sponsored youth athletic teams. The Committee believes that sanctions for failing to comply with this policy should include seasonal, annual or total suspension for the violators. Member Paulus said this is a part of the School District's plan concerning the issue of alcohol use by students in athletic programs. The issue of enforcement would need to be cleared up and some good coaches may be lost. Member Kelly asked if this could merely be a policy statement that we do not approve of alcohol consumption by coaches and chaperons. After considerable discussion, Member Smith made a motion to refer the matter back to the Community Health Services Advisory Committee with the directive that the Committee work with-the Edina Park Board to discuss the recommendation and the concerns raised by the Council with the athletic associations and then report back to the Council. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. PROPOSAL BY METRO RELATIONS. INC. TO MONITOR THE MWCC DISCUSSED Manager Rosland advised that he had received a proposal from Eugene E. Franchett, owner of Metro Relations, Inc., who has extensive background experience in government affairs, to provide ongoing Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) oversight, analysis and advocacy service for cities. Fees would vary depending on a city's use of the wastewater system and for the City of Edina would be approximately $5700 per year. The rates charged by MWCC have continued to rise and it has been very frustrating to attempt to get answers from the MWCC. He said that something should probably be done to monitor the activities and expenditures of MWCC. The question is who should do this. Manager Rosland said he would like to talk with the Suburban Rate Authority before he would recommend the proposal from Metro Relations, Inc. No action was taken. EDINA CHAMBER OF CO1rMCE PROPOSAL TO AUTHORIZE SALE OF STRONG BEER DISCUSSED• PUBLIC FORUM TO BE HELD Marsh Everson, President of the Edina Chamber of Commerce, referred to his letter of November 8, 1990, addressed to the Mayor and Council Members. The letter advised that the Minnesota Legislature, in its 1990 session, passed legislation enabling municipalities to, by ordinance, authorize the holder of an on -sale wine license to sell 3.2 beer, and whose total sales are at least 60 percent attributable to the sale of food, to sell strong beer at on -sale without an additional license (340a.404, Subd.S(b)). After consideration and discussion, the Board of Directors of the Edina Chamber of Commerce has concluded that the passage of an ordinance by the City, of Edina authorizing the sale of strong beer in a manner consistent with the existing ordinances regulating the sale of on -sale wine would be beneficial to the business environment of the City, which in turn, would serve the general best interests of the City as a whole.. After reaching this conclusion, the Board of Directors passed a resolution supporting the addition of strong beer to the wine licensing ordinance as provided by Minnesota law, and hereby requests that the City Council consider and pass an enabling ordinance to that effect. Virginia Bodine, Executive Director, Edina Chamber of Commerce, commented that there have been no problems with the on -sale wine ordinance. Their primary concern was the businesses in Edina and they would like to support them. Adding strong beer to the on -sale wine ordinance would be helpful to the businesses. Warren Beck, Gabbert and Beck and Board Member, said that the issue is not the percentage of alcohol but the brands available to restaurants. Most premium or imported beers are not 3.2 beer and restaurants which are trying to provide an extensive array of beverages to their customers, based on customers' desires, find themselves limited by not having strong beer available. By considering this kind of action and taking the steps to allow the sale of strong beer, the primary benefit would be the attraction of restaurants for which sale of imported beers is considered as important to business development as the sale of wines. Attorney Erickson clarified that this would require an amendment to the on -sale wine licensing ordinance. He explained that the statute does not define "intoxicating malt liquor ". There is a definition of "intoxicating liquor" which includes malt beverage which has by weight more than 3.2% alcohol: So in essence, it is an intoxicating liquor and they are defining it more closely by calling it "intoxicating malt liquor" which presumably means beer at more than 3.2% alcohol. In order to sell strong beer as provided by the statute, there are three requirements: 1) you must hold an on -sale wine license, 2) you must hold a 3.2 beer on -sale license, and 3) 60% or more of gross receipts must be attributable to the sale of food. Then the Council may if it wishes, by ordinance, allow the sale of strong beer without an additional license. The issue was raised by the Council as to whether this could be interpreted to permit the sale of intoxicating liquor. Attorney Erickson said that could be solved by the use of language in the ordinance that would clearly define strong beer. Also discussed was whether there should be an advisory referendum or public hearing on the matter. Member Kelly made a motion that staff work with the Chamber of Commerce Board to bring back a specific.proposal to hold a public forum after the first of the year to solicit comments on the issue of an ordinance amendment that would allow the sale of strong beer by holders of an on -sale wine license who also hold a 3.2 beer license if 60% or more of gross receipts are attributable to the sale of food. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus,. Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED RELATING TO TAX FORFEITED LAND: PARCEL TO BE ACOUIRED FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES Planner Craig Larsen informed the Council that staff had discussed the three parcels on the Hennepin County List 760 -NC of tax forfeited land. Per state statute the City can request any of the following: 1) Approve ,the parcel(s) for public auction, or 2) Approve the parcels) for sale to adjacent property owners, of 3) Request conveyance to the.City for public use without monetary consideration. Staff would recommend the following: Parcel A (PINS 08- 116 -21 -42 -0216) Located adjacent to the City's existing ponding and open space in the Dewey Hill Estates plat. Public ownership of the parcel for open space is desirable. Parcel B (PINS 29- 117 -21 -43 -0047) A small 30 by 20 foot portion of a private alley serving homes on Doncaster Way and Lochloy Drive. There appears to be no public purpose for acquisition of this parcel. Sale of parcel to abutting property owners is recommended. Parcel C (PINS 20- 028 -24 -34 -0002) Narrow strip of land (11 1/2 feet) between 3205 and 3219 West.60th Street. There is no history on why this parcel was created. There are no public utilities or public uses of the property. Sale of parcel to abutting property owners is recommended. Member Rice introduced the following resolutions and moved adoption: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that the City Attorney be authorized and directed to file "Application by Governmental Subdivision For Conveyance of Tag Forfeited Lands ", for the following described property contained in Hennepin County Auditor's List "760 -NC ", said property to be used by the City as hereafter set forth: PIN 08- 116 -21 -42 -0216 - Open space. ADOPTED this 19th day of November, 1990. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has received "from the County of Hennepin a list of lands in said municipality which became the property of the State of.Minnesota for non - payment of property taxes, which said list was received on 11/07/90, Non - Conservation List 760 -NC; and WHEREAS, the parcels in said list identified as PIN Nos. 29- 117 -21 -43 -0047 and 20- 028 -24 -34 -0002 have heretofore been classified by the Board of County Commissioners of Hennepin County, Minnesota as non - conservation land and the sale thereof has`heretofore been authorized by said Board of County Commissioners; WHEREAS, it has been determined by the Edina City Council that there are no existing or pending special assessments on said parcels; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the said classification is hereby approved; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,by the Edina)City Council that, acting pursuant to Minnesota Statute 282.01, it has determined that said parcels of land are not buildable according to the City's Zoning Ordinance because of minimum area and that sale of said parcels be limited to abutting property owners for attachment thereto. ADOPTED this 19th day of November, 1990. Motion for adoption of the resolutions was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolutions adopted. *BOARD OF REVIEW HEARING DATE SET FOR 4/22191 Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to set April 22, 1991 as hearing date for the Board of Review. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *1991 COUNCIL MEETING DATES APPROVED Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to approve the following Council Meeting Schedule for 1991 for- months when the regular meeting falls on a holiday: January - Monday, January 7 Tuesday, January 22 February - Monday, February 4 Tuesday, February 19 September - Monday, September 9 Monday, September 23 Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES REPORTED Member Smith reported the following: 1) The School District and City will meet on November 20 to discuss further developments for the Senior Citizen Center at the Edina Community Center in an effort to enhance the Center. 2) South Hennepin Human Services Council - The message is getting out that we have to decide what SHHSC's mission is to be and the cost thereof and then go back for funding from the cities. A meeting is scheduled in early December with. the Council representatives, Executive Committee and City Managers to get to the bottom line on that issue. Currently, no new director is being hired. Staff consists of an office manager and one other staff,person. MAINTENANCE OF CITY'S HOUSING STOCK DISCUSSED Member Smith said he is concerned that some of the residents are not maintaining their homes and recalled that part of the City's Mission Statement talks about maintaining the residential community. He suggested that the Council consider some type of credit against the appraised value for costs incurred by residents for maintenance work on their properties. Member Rice said he felt the City should be more pro - active in enforcing existing codes. It was generally agreed that this issue should be discussed prior to the Council Strategic Planning Session in March. A Saturday work session in early January was suggested. FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE DETO% CENTER TO BE CLOSED. Manager Rosland reported that he and Chief Craig Swanson had attended a meeting last week regarding the potential closing of the Eden Prairie Detox Center operated by Fairview Southdale Hospital. Fairview Southdale wanted to lobby Hennepin County more aggressively in an effort to keep the center open. Other alternatives were considered, i.e. sobering house, which the County may consider supporting instead of the medical model that the Fairview Southdale Detox Center offers. If the detox center is closed, the Edina Police Officers will have to use the facility at Plymouth (medical' model) or Minneapolis at 18th Street /Chicago Avenue (sobering station). Chief Swanson explained that, if both those facilities are full, the Police Officers will release the intoxicated individual to a responsible adult or take the person to the Metropolitan Medical Center emergency. MLC HOST BREAKFAST FOR LEGISLATORS NOTED Manager Rosland said he would attend the MLC-Host Breakfast for legislators on December 5, 1990. He suggested that the Council Members considering attending because Edina has a newly elected representative for District 42B. WILDLIFE COMMITTEE TO DEAL WITH WILDLIFE ISSUES Manager Rosland informed the Council that a committee has been formed, chaired by Assistant Manager Hughes, to deal with all the issues and problems relating to wildlife (raccoons, geese, deer, etc.) in the City. The committee will look at existing ordinances and will consider other ordinance provisions such as "no feed" which may be necessary. The committee will report their recommendations to the Council at the second meeting in January, 1991. *CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to, approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated 11/19/90 and consisting of 29 pages: General Fund $265,709.33, C.D.B.G. $35.00, Communications $5,251.00, Art Center $9,709.76, Capital Fund $535.00, Golf Course Fund $9,944.00, Recreation Center Fund $8,798.43, Gun Range Fund $817.26, Edinborough Park $17,948.35, Utility Fund $9,880.31, Storm Sewer Utility $6,754.02, Liquor Dispensary Fund $108,051.28, Construction Fund $341,377.38, Total $784,811.10; and for confirmation of payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check,Register dated 10/31/90 and consisting of 18 pages: General Fund $963,362.61, Communications $2,475.02, Art Center $1,133.23, Swimming Pool Fund $918.46, Golf Course Fund $18,166.26, Recreation Center Fund $13,893.11, Gun Range Fund $452.18, Edinborough Park $14,555.23, Utility Fund $46,097.62, Storm Sewer Utility $76.47, Liquor Dispensary Fund $254,606.06, Total $1,315,736.25 Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. There being -no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the meeting adjourned at 10:47 p.m. City Clerk l MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL DECEMBER 3, 1990 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Paulus, Kelly, Rice, Smith and Mayor Richards. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Paulus to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING RECONVENED: TESTIMONY SOLICITED: CONTINUED TO 12/17/90 Mayor Richards advised that this was a reconvened meeting of the Truth in Taxation hearing to solicit public comment on the proposed property tax increase in the 1991 Budget for the City of Edina. He stated that the proposed 1991 Budget will not be formally adopted until the close of the hearing process and that additional testimony will be heard at the regular Council Meeting of December 17. Mayor Richards reiterated that the budget process began earlier in the year when the Council established guidelines for budget assumptions. Staff then estimated expenditures and revenues-for 1991 and the, Council accepted a proposed 1991 Budget totaling $13,577,622 for purposes of holding the Truth in Taxation hearings as mandated by state statute. He observed that approximately 77% of the proposed budget would be raised by real estate taxes, with the balance coming from various fees and charges. Expenditures for 1991 for delivery of services are estimated to increase by 4.2% over 1989, resulting in a 3.9% increase in real estate taxes. Mayor Richards then called for comments from the audience. Hearing none, Mayor Richards declared the hearing adjourned to December.17, 1990, at 7 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING CONCLUDED ON REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR FARRELLS PARKWOOD KNOLLS - TRACT A. R.L.S. 1286 (5700 BLAKE RD); NO ACTION TAKEN Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen recalled that the request for preliminary plat approval for Farrells Parkwood Knolls - Tract A, R.L.S. 1286 (5700 Blake Rd) was first heard on November 19, 1990. The request is for a three lot subdivision on the west side of Blake Road and south of South Knoll Drive. At the November 19 meeting the Council continued the hearing and requested further information relative to specifics of the new lots proposed in the plat: 1) Footprint and design of house proposed for Lot 2, 2) Location of proposed driveways, 3) Landscaping or vegetation plan, 4) Setbacks for homes on Lots 2 and 3,.and 5) Location of conservation easements on Lots 1 and 3. In response the proponents have submitted a revised site plan and an outline of their proposed development restrictions illustrating the following: Lot 1 - The existing house has driveway access to Blake Road. The revised plan suggests abandoning the Blake access and construction of a new garage served by a driveway from South Knoll Drive. The driveway curves to avoid larger trees on the site. There.is no conservation easement suggested for Lot 1. Lot 2 - A one story walkout rambler style home is illustrated. "Proposed restrictions suggest,a setback from South Knoll of not less than 120 feet and would require a variance. The. driveway for Lot 2 would also come off of South Knoll Drive. Lot 3 - Remains essentially unchanged. A 100 foot conservation easement adjacent to the pond is illustrated. If the revised proposal meets with Council approval, staff would recommend that preliminary approval be conditioned on: l) Developers Agreement, 2) Restrictive Covenants Agreement,.and 3) Granting of lot width variances for Lots 1 and 3 as required by the Subdivision Ordinance at final plat approval. Presentation for Proponent James Van Valkenburg, representing the proponents, stated that they have attempted to respond to the questions raised by the Council and are back to request preliminary plat approval. He explained that the revised site plan illustrates two driveways coming in from South Knoll not over 12 feet wide. For Lot 1 the driveway location may change to preserve the large tree in the center-of the property. He reiterated that all of the proposed lots are substantially larger than the neighborhood median of 20,000 square feet, i.e. Lot 1 at 32,300 square feet, Lot 2 at 26,700 square feet and Lot 3 at 36,700 square feet. As now proposed, the proponents are requesting a lot width variance of four feet on Lot 1. On Lot 3 they are asking for a lot width variance from 130 feet to 108 feet for the reason that the home will be sited back in on the lot. The ordinance requirement as to lot width is aimed at the width of a lot at the place of construction. The building pad for Lot 2 would take advantage of the two hills on the property. As to Lot 3 where the Farrells intend to build, a 100 foot conservation easement adjacent to the pond will be provided. Mr. Van Valkenburg then introduced Mr. Kennedy, builder for the Farrells. Using photographs Mr. Kennedy pointed out and explained that footprints for the houses proposed were placed so as to preserve the large trees on all of the lots. He said that the garage on Lot 2 could be turned somewhat, that the house would have a hip roof which would nestle in on the lot and would have 2100 square feet on the first floor. For the Farrells' new house on Lot 3, the large oak tree closest to the house could probably be saved if the deck could overhang the conservation easement. Mr. Van Valkenburg then spoke to the proposed restrictions that would be placed on the lots: 1) one level house with maximun height of 20 feet, 2) 120 foot setback from South Knoll Drive, 3) house no larger than 2,500 square feet excluding garage, 4) potentially two curb cuts on South Knoll Drive, one on Blake Road, and 5) open space and conservation easements over entire lots (no removal of trees except less that 3" diameter or dead or diseased except for building footprint, with 100 foot conservation easement on Lot 3, and 6) architectural committee. Public Comment Thomas Wurst, 6205 South Knoll Drive, said it was his understanding from presentations made at the last meeting that the Council had held in abeyance the concept of a three lot subdivision. He said .that he and his wife have not changed their position. They would go along with two lots but object to the proposed three lots. They are still concerned as to the aesthetics, economic impact and failure to conform with the developed lots on the south side of South Knoll Drive. In particular, they .feel that if the three lots are developed a substantial number of trees will be removed and that the natural slopes will be disturbed. Mr. Wurst stated that Lot 3 is acceptable to them but they feel that the proposed Lots 1 and 2 should remain as they are at the present time. Max Bowler, 6112 Kaymar Drive, stated that the proposal would change the character of the neighborhood. Although the large trees will be preserved, the smaller vegetation will have to come out. Further, that.the three lot subdivision as illustrated gives the feeling of being crowded. Carol Mahony, 6216 Schaefer Circle, commented that she was opposed to three lots being developed on the subject property. �7 Council Comment Mayor Richards recalled that at the last meeting the Council had deferred action and had concurred that they would consider a three lot subdivision if the two property owners, Farrells and Wursts, were able to get together on a specific plan for development of three homes on three lots. What is before the Council is a staff report and Planning Commission recommendation and a proposal by the proponents that is not subservient by the adjacent property owner. Member Rice asked for clarification of the Council's options. Attorney Erickson explained the process as follows. After hearing and recommendation of the Planning Commission, the Council must act to either grant preliminary approval with or without conditions or give preliminary and final approval at one hearing with or without conditions. If conditions are imposed at preliminary approval they must be met before final approval is granted. The Council may also deny the subdivision on the theory that it does not comply with the Zoning Ordinance because variances are required. In order for variances to be granted, the proponents must show an undue hardship which is defined as something other than economic and which is based upon circumstances unique to the property and not created by the property owner. Member Rice raised the question as to what proposal the Planning Commission saw and upon which they based their recommendation for denial. Planner Larsen explained that initially the preliminary plat submitted showed three lots with Lots 1 and 2 oriented east to west. Throughout the process Lot 3 has remained the same. Just prior to the meeting of the Planning Commission a revised preliminary plat was submitted that showed the northerly portion of the property as one lot for the existing house with Lot 3 unchanged which the Planning Commission voted to approve. Following that, the proponents decided not to proceed to the Council but instead returned to the Planning Commission with a revised three lot subdivision. The northerly portion of the proposed plat was then divided east /west to allow a greater setback from South Knoll Drive. The Planning Commission recommended denial of that three lot subdivision. Member Paulus observed that one issue would be the variances that Lot 2 would require. No hardship is indicated until the property would be subdivided and if granted could set an unusual precedent. Member Smith commented that as he looked at the neighborhood on South Knoll Drive on a square foot basis, the proposed lots would fit in there with the exception of the Wurst's lot. However, the topograph goes from one extreme to the other. He suggested that the proposal be sent back for revision so that no variances would be necessary. Mayor Richards submitted that good planning would suggest that three lots not be approved. taking into account the physicial characteristics, the existing home and the fact that this appears to be economically driven. He said he would support reaffirming the Planning Commission recommendation. Member Rice said he would like.to see this go back to the Planning Commission because there has been four plans presented for this property. Although the lots do conform in size to all but the Wurst property and is an unique piece of . property, he said he was concerned about the Lot 2 variances. Member Rice moved that this be referred back to the Planning Commission with the proposal as now presented or any revision the proponents may wish to present and then bring it back to the Council with the Planning Commission's recommendation on on Tuesday, January 22, 1991. Motion was seconded by Member'Smith. Ayes: Rice, Smith Nays: Kelly, Paulus, Richards ' Motion failed. Mayor Richards moved that the matter be continued to the meeting of December 17, 1990. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Richards Nays: Paulus, Rice, Smith Motion failed. Member Smith made a motion to grant the four foot lot width variance for Lot 1. Motion.failed for lack of second. No further action by the Council being offered, Mayor Richards stated that the matter would sit until the proponent requests that the Council take action on the preliminary plat. LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR 5109 WEST 50TH STREET PROPERTY (REGIS CORPORATION /S00 LINE RAILROAD) .Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Paulus for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute various separate parcels: Parcel A Lots 1 and the East 90 feet of Lots 20, 21 and 22, Block 2, "GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS" Lots 3 to 7 inclusive, Block 8, " TINGDALE BROS' BROOKSIDE" That part of Hopkins Road, vacated, lying between lines drawn across it from the Southeast corner of Lot 7, Block 8, " TINGDALE BROS' BROOKSIDE ", to the Northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 2, "GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS" and from the Southwest corner of Lot 5 in said Block 8 to the Northwest corner of the East 90 feet of Lot 22, in said Block 2, according to the recorded plats thereof. Parcel B All of Lot 1 and Lot ,2 except that part of said Lot 2 lying Northerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the East line of Lot 2 distant 20 feet'South of the Northeast corner thereof; thence running Southwesterly to a point on the West line of said Lot 2 distant 40 feet South of the Northwest corner thereof, Block 8 " TINGDALE BROS.' BROOKSIDE ", according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for-said County (Hennepin County). Parcel C That part of Hopkins Road, vacated, and that part of Government Lot Five (5), Section Twenty Eight (28), Township One Hundred Seventeen (117) North, Range Twenty One (21) West and that part of Lots 20, 21, and 22, Block 2, GRAND VIEW HEIGHTS described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of Lot 5, Block 8, TINGDALE BROS' BROOKSIDE; thence South 23 degrees 48 minutes 29 seconds West, assumed bearing, a distance of 66.27 feet to the northwest corner of the East 90 feet of Lot 22, Block 2, GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS; thence South 00 degrees 15 minutes 00 seconds West along the west line of the east 90 feet of said Lots 20, 21 and 22, Block 2, a distance of 177.68 feet to the south line of said Lot 20, Block 2; thence North 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West along the south line of said Lot 20, Block 2,,a distance of 2.00 feet; thence North 00 degrees 15 minutes 00 seconds East, parallel with said west line of the East 90 feet of Lots 20, 21 and 22, Block 2, a distance of 376.34 feet; thence South 89 degrees 45 minutes 00 seconds East, a distance of 28.12 feet to the west line of Block 8, TINGSDALE BROS' BROOKSIDE; thence South 00 degrees 05 minutes 50 seconds West along said west line of Block 8, a distance of 137.90 feet to the point of beginning, according to the recorded plats thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to subdivide said tracts into the following described new and separate parcel: All of Parcels A, B and C as described above ,WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in ,the City of Edina Ordinances Nos. 804 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 804 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Resolution adopted on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR FERTILIZER FOR BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Paulus for award of bid'for fertilizer for Braemar Golf Course to recommended low bidder, Precision Turf, at $9,114.56. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR GOLF CARTS Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Paulus for award of bid for six golf carts to recommended low bidder, E Z Go Upper Midwest, at $12,700.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES FOR ENTERPRISE FUNDS PRESENTED AND DISCUSSED Finance Director John Wallin presented the Executive Summary Income and Expense Reports for the nine months ended September 30, 1990, for all the City's Enterprise Funds. Member Smith asked if the amounts listed for depreciation are included in the City's budget. Director Wallin explained that depreciation is purely an accounting matter. Because these funds are set up as enterprise funds, as part of the annual audit procedure the auditors require us to account for depreciation. He explained that the income before depreciation figure for each fund actually reflects the operating cash position. Discussion followed on the issue of whether the City should actually "bank" funds for depreciation, with no formal action taken. It was the consensus of the Council that a summary of the balance sheets for the enterprise funds be provided for the next quarterly report. APPEAL OF RONALD EDBLOM REGARDING MASSAGE LICENSE CONSIDERED: APPLICANT TO RE- SUBMIT APPLICATION Mayor Richards pointed out that the appeal of Ronald Edblom concerns his application to practice massage at the Edina Country Club. Because some of the Council are members of the Edina Country Club, he asked if anyone felt they had a conflict of interest in considering this matter. Mayor Richards and Members Rice and Smith each stated that they did not consider the fact that they are members to be a conflict. Della V.. Boutrous, Adams & Cesario, P.A., stated that she was representing Ronald Edblom in the appeal of the massage license denial. She stated that on October 17, 1990, her client was advised that his application for an individual massage_ license had been denied because of falsification of information on the application. Further, that background investigation revealed information Contrary to that indicated on the application; specifically that Mr. Edblom had answered "no" to a question regarding conviction of a criminal offense other than a traffic offense. Ms. Boutrous explained that the conviction stemmed from an incident when her client was 19 years old. At the time he understood that once a plea was entered that the allegation against him would be continued and then dismissed if he complied with the terms of the sentence and probation. Based on that .assumption, he felt he had answered the question on the application truthfully. Ms. Boutrous submitted that her client.is deserving of a license of this type as he is committed to being a responsible, competent massage therapist. He holds two certificates of training, esalen therapeutic massage and sports technician massage.. He has taken out liability insurance to protect his clients and responses from his clients have been positive. Ms. Boutrous asked that the Council reverse the denial for an individual massage license for Mr. Edblom. Mayor Richards asked what the options were for Council action. Attorney Erickson said the Council could either refer the matter back to staff for conclusion of the investigation and its recommendation on the merits, or allow the applicant to re- submit a corrected.application and the investigation proceed to its conclusion. Following discussion and questions directed to the applicant, Member Kelly made a motion that the applicant be allowed to re- submit an application for an individual massage license and that the investigation proceed. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. REQUEST TO ALLOW RESIDENTIAL PARKING IN.50TH & FRANCE MUNICIPAL PARKING RAMPS CONSIDERED: POLICY UNCHANGED Manager Rosland informed the Council that a letter had been received from Mary C. Layer, resident at the Lanterns Condominiums on 51st Street, requesting that she and presumably other residents be issued a parking permit to park in the 51st Street municipal parking ramp. Ms. Layer's request was previously considered by the City Council on November 21, 1988. At that meeting the Council denied the request based upon the following reasons: 1) The City _._ discourages.overnight parking in municipal ramps due to risk of vandalism, etc., and 2) Concern that if.overnight parking were granted, individuals may ask for long -term storage of vehicles which would conflict with the intended purpose of the ramps. In staff's opinion, the concerns expressed two years ago remain valid and denial is recommended. It was the consensus of the Council that the previous policy remain unchanged and 'that staff draft a letter to Ms. Layer advising her that the policy remains the same. PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF 1991 POLICE TEAMSTERS CONTRACT TENTATIVELY APPROVED Manager Rosland informed the Council that the following economic issues have been tentatively agreed upon for the 1991 Teamsters Contract: 1) Wages for 1991 - 4% increase, and 2) Employer's insurance contribution - $210.00 /month. These increases are consistent with the budgeted amounts proposed in the 1991 Budget currently under consideration. Staff would recommend tentative approval., Member Paulus made a motion for tentative approval of the staff recommendations regarding the 1991 Teamsters Contract relating to wages and employer's insurance contribution, subject to final adoption of the 1991 Budget for the City of Edina. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Ayes.: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried: *PROPOSAL OF METRO RELATIONS. INC. TO MONITOR MWCC CONTINUED TO 12/17/90 Motion was made by Member Kelly.and was seconded by Member Paulus to continue consideration of the proposal of Metro Relations, Inc.'to monitor the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission to December 17, 1990. Motion carried on rollca,ll vote, five ayes.. *YEAR END COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR 12127/90 Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Paulus setting December 27, 1990, at 4:30 p.m. as the.Year End Council Meeting date. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *ANNUAL COUNCIL DINNER MEETING WITH ADVISORY BOARDS SET FOR 3/12/91 Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Paulus that the 1991 Annual Council Dinner Meeting with advisory boards /commissions be held on Tuesday, March 12, 1991, at 6:00 p.m. at Braemar Clubhouse. Motion carried on rollcall vote,.five ayes. COUNCIL WORK SESSION ON HOUSING SCHEDULED -FOR 1/12/91 Manager Rosland suggested two possible dates, Saturday, January 5 or Saturday, January 12 for the Council Work Session on Housing. It was the consensus of the Council that the meeting be held on Saturday, January 12 from 8:00 a.m. to noon at Arneson Acres Park. Mayor Richards submitted proposed agenda items and asked that the Council Members advise him or the Manager of any additional issues prior to the meeting. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES REPORTED The following intergovernmental activities and issues were discussed: 1. Letter of Alison D. Fuhr addressed to Governor -Elect Carlson,regarding potential appointment. Mayor Richards said he was unclear as to whether she was seeking City support for a specific position and that he would follow up on this. 2. South Hennepin Human Services Council - Member Smith reported that the planning committee is coming forth with a plan to obtain a grant to fund and replace First Call For Help. The proposal would still require $25,000 from the participating cities and would be a direct provision of services. He has suggested that the concept be presented to the SHHSC Board and then to the cities for approval before further action. Also, the board will meet with the city managers on December 6, 1990, to consider the reorganization of SHHSC to respond to the needs of the city managers and Hennepin County regarding human services. 3. School Board Strategic Planning Quarterly Report - Member Paulus reported that all the strategic planning objectives of the School Board are being met and are moving forward. The report will be on file with the City Manager for reference. 4. Council /School Board Meeting - Member Kelly suggested that the Council meet with the School Board to discuss mutually the impact of School and City budgets on residents. MLC ANNUAL LEGISLATIVE DINNER SCHEDULED FOR 1/30/91 Manager Rosland reminded the Council that the MLC Annual Legislative Dinner has been tentatively set for Wednesday, January 30, 1991 at the Decathlon Club. Reservations can be made through his office. MLC LEGISLATIVE BREAKFAST SCHEDULED FOR 1215/90 Manager Rosland reminded the Council that the MLC Legislative Breakfast is scheduled for December 5, 1990 at 7:30 a.m. Reservations are due by December 4 and will be made for those Council Members who can attend. EDINA FOUNDATION'S CONTRIBUTION TO .FUTURES COMMISSION NOTED Mayor Richards advised that he had received a letter from the Chairman of The Edina Foundation Board complimenting the Futures Commission on their excellent report. The Foundation'had also enclosed their contribution of $5,000.00 towards the Futures Commission project. CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Paulus to approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Registered dated 12/03/90 and consisting of 21 pages: General'Fund $95,613.56, C.D.B.G. $6,724.00, Communications $2,458.29, Art Center $84,405.64, Capital Fund $784.70, Golf Course Fund $25,385.67, Recreation Center Fund $3,337.64, Edinborough Park I '$10,439.63, Utility Fund $232,831.97, Storm Sewer Utility $1,864.00, Liquor Dispensary Fund $5,907.47, Construction Fund $45,060.63, Total $514,813.20. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the meeting adjourned at 10 :47 p.m. City Cler _ t�\nlrl.n c tu►1:. R.V.. �t. ;\. l.irrNSrd l'�r.lr�.heGisl M A V I S C. I OSSUNI. M.: \., l'( UC' -R l.irrnx d h r'rh e,/, ,i. I Lirnlsrd .Vul" hn r• c@ !'umi /r 7hcrapi.sl I I I A I I -: L. IIANSI•.N. M.A., CCIX %R l,ir r llm-d l ti rrhnhe. i.w l.iee-n.se l Ilarriu,4c d' l'unuh' l'hrrupisi January 31, 1991 _John Mooty Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty and Bennett, P.A. Law Offices 3400 City Center 33 South 6th Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Dear Mr. Mooty: AGENDA ITEM II.A. SIIARON WOLFF' ONDICII. M.A. Licensed Ns.rr•heeG.,tl.s! (SARI' R. PERRIN, 1110). Licensed C'onsulling P.spc•hologist PAUL R. IIJELL1�., M.S.M. )IV. Llee nse'd Social Wen-ke•r I have been asked by Dr. Joyce Anderson, a Licensed Consulting Psychologist, to assist in clarifying the standard of practice as it relates to the private practice of psychology. I am currently serving as the President of the Minnnesota Psychologists in Private Practice. This is an organization' composed of psychologists from throughout the state of Minnesota who are currently engaging in private practice. In this role, I have had the occasion to interact with the bulk of my membership and a large number of individuals in private practice who are not part of our professional group. I have discovered that it is, in fact, a usual and customary procedure for private practice psychologists to offer, service hours that may extend throughout the day and into the evening. These hours may begin as early as 7 AM and extend to as late as 8 PM or later. I suspect that this is due to a variety, of factors, but is certainly- an attempt on the part of the profession to offer much needed services to the consumer. As far as I know, this has been the case for many years and I anticipate it being the case for some time to come. I do hope that this small bit of information assists in clarifying the concern regarding Dr. Anderson's practice. If I can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact me,. Sincerely, Gary R. Perrin, Ph.D. Licensed Consulting Psychologist GRP:nac CC: Dr. �jyce Anderson Edina City Council Members Fw*.haaW & lCed& 1809 Plymouth Road South *Suite 2209Minnetonka, MN 55343•(612) S45.4494 'mot ?,��•= •::�:,�'�5� ' �;� }f.:,1 .1 71E6 Cornelis urive :aims., in. b543b Jan. 23, 2�C1 ,)cur i:lembers of' ?dina City Council, w-1- aid not sF.na a lets -:.r to you before tr.c City Council meetin.g Jon. 22 (vi :icn wci aiu at-reno), but want to tr:ke tr:is ojiportunity to go on recora :: s bein , oprosr:ci to the issuance of tL temoorury conaitional use permit to Joyce Anaerson tisitriout specific con - aitions. i.irs. Pi.ulusl point was particularly wall tatien tr':At Atr.Out Specifics ` Lucre could be tfie: opening of t:.e provf -rbial n c =;n of worms` >.s to •a.nat other busincss .s mirnt svrine _ azna ,_:t tip;: ut hours. Srie, ulonr v ;iti's ,;r. Emit.. c ;._'r. aichurus, hLu points ti,ut ere re very vell t:.ken una wf are rjaa Vie o(;rr..it .%as auniEu. ce are certainly not agt:inst hanaici occ;a people �arninF a living-,. �e urr o ;;.osc:a to mt,nipulutiv,- ^eoplc: playing on sympt;thies to fur - tiicr ti eir own cause. There is r real concern in the neik- hborr:oou Lis to cne: uegree or uisubility that r,:ally exists. If' tiiere ..re unaublisireu aisabilitie:s to xnici_ titre are not "privy" tt:Lt is her privilege to eoncuat, but it aoes not lena s- r::path -y or sapport to :ier situation. ie Lrc um:ble to uttena -che next council meeting but certeinly hope u new more sari nrent tE:mpor,iry ccnuiti:)nvl use p: ":rIr11t ,:ill be eonsiaered befor- one is �s resiaents Of :__dint' 117 t :':1S 1OCitLirin i•Or 2�, yctirs v.f: c`rtc.inly ao not 1i::c> ti.E� iaeu. of,,)-rr.?ittinrr businesses in resiacntd�1 ur(,as: liianx you nor your consi;::_:r?aion. Sincerely, '':r. , rs. ova rXn cf:rg v - `�\ WNIAL GiURCH OF EDINA January 30, 1991 Kenneth Rosland Edina City Manager Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Rosland: I am writing to you in my capacity as the Minnesota Psychological Association's liaison Person for disability issues related to the practice of psychology in Minnesota. The Minnesota Psychological Association (MPA) has an active concern for insuring the rights of persons with disabilities as well as the rights of all persons who seek mental health services. It has come to our attention that Dr. Joyce Anderson has not been able to reach a satisfactory resolution of her zoning issue with you and the Edina City Council. I urge you to take into consideration the following points: 1. Disabled persons in the practice of Psychology often need to structure their Practices around their disability. Accommodations for a disabling condition -can take a variety of forms. MPA has a long- standing interest in insuring that qualified disabled persons have equality of access to employment through reasonable accommodations for their diability. Dr. Anderson's disability necessitates practicing in her home. This certainly seems to be a reasonable accommodation for her particular disabling condition. 2. The American Psychological Association (APA) and MPA are especially concerned about.discriminatory attitudes toward persons who utilize the services of -psychologists and other mental health professionals. The APA has taken an active interest in a number of legal actions in other (over) COMMUNITY CONGREGATIONAL • 6200 COLONIAL WAY, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55436 • 612/925 -2711 cities which involved attempts to r.est.rici- zonini' to n_ro- hibit mental health services in residential neighbor- hoods, based upon discriminatory attitudes and stereotypes. 3. Persons who seek the services of a psychologist have a right to choose the therapist who is most. competent and qualified to meet their particular needs. Citizens who choose to see Dr. Anderson for psychotherapy for personal growth have a right to meet with her at a mutually convenient place and time. 4. In order to meet the needs of their clients, many psychotherapists find it necessary to,provide late afternoon and evening appointment hours. Frequently our clients are people with professional responsibilities who are unable to schedule personal appointments during business hours. Dr. Anderson should be able to schedule appointments to accommodate the needs of her clients. I hope you will take these points into consideration in your negotiations with Dr. Anderson. If necessary, the Minnesota Psychological Association Executive Council will take further action Sincerely, Lynn Lockhart, Ph.D., L.C.P. MPA Representative to American Psychological Association Committee on Psychology and Disability CC: Susan Rydell, Ph.D., President, Minnesota Psychological Association John;Mooty, Attorney at Law FIS 6 A/1 a_ M 1 ' MAYO S. BRANDJORD 7112 Glouchester Edina, Minnesota 55435 (612) 925 -2690 February 1, 1991 Edina Mayor Richards City Council Members City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Amendment to zoning ordinance #825 as it applies to Dr. Joyce Anderson, owner and resident at 7121 Glouchester Avenue Greetings: My wife and I own our house at 7112 Glouchester Avenue which we purchased in 1976. I have attended all but one of the City Hall meetings related to the referenced issue. The use of Dr. Anderson's home has been given a fair hearing. I do not believe that there is anything new of importance to present to the Council. Therefore, I hope that the Council will try very hard to render a fair decision at the February 4 meeting. In the following I will review some of the information put before the Council that I think should dictate the Council's final decision: 1. The Council acted wisely when it amended the referenced Ordinance #825 to accommodate the handicapped. The Council also acted wisely when it kept a tight control over the application approval process. The amendment gives voice and protection to the neighborhood. The Council will have final control over the use of private homes for business purposes in Edina, which will prevent any abuse. However, when the Council reviews an application, it must not place more restrictions on one applicant than on another, handicapped or non - handicapped. All restrictions should be reasonable and have a sound basis for being applied. If the approval includes too many restrictions, it becomes only a cruel sham. The applicant must be able to &ive normal expected hours of service and must be able to make a reasonable income. 2. Dr. Anderson is an established resident of Edina. She has served clients in her homes for seven or eight years. First, one block south of her present home and three to four years at 7121 Glouchester Avenue. She is not an interlooper who sneaked into the neighborhood. She purchased her home openly and made a point of meeting with her new neighbors and told them about her practice. In earlier years she taught piano to hundreds of students in her home at other locations and was unaware of any restrictions on the use of her home for present clients. Edina Mayor Richards February 1, 1991 Page Two 3. Dr. Anderson's clients add very little vehicular traffic to Glouchester Avenue. There is not a traffic problem, even with many neighbors operating two and three cars and have teenage drivers. There should never be a question about how many clients use her driveway because it can be checked against Dr. Anderson's client logs. 4. Those who claim that Dr. Anderson should be able to operate from a medical building, ignore the professional medical opinion on her physical limitations. Where medical buildings do provide special ingress and egress and toilet accommodations for the handicapped, that's about it. Medical examining rooms certainly are not appropriate for counseling and certainly do not make allowances for Dr. Anderson's physical limitations. The limited hours Dr. Anderson can physically work also limits the number of clients she can see in one day, and of course limits her income. The size of her practice will not support the expense of a little used office. 5. I repeat what I have stated before the Council. Dr. Anderson is a credit to our neighborhood and has not caused any problems over the three or four years she has served her clients in her home on our block. The whole dispute over her use of her home should not have been taken to the Planning Department in the first place. That action is now a confirmed shame, and regretted by almost all of the neighbors. I ask that the Council approve Dr. Anderson's application without any limitations on the hours and days of the week she can see her clients. Respectfully submitted, Mayo S. Brand] - - January 31, 1991 7113 Cornelia Drive Edina, MN 55435 Edina City Council Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Richards and City Council Members: The subject of this letter is the attempt by Dr. Joyce Anderson to practice psychology at her residence for more than the allowable number of patients, 10, that she is allowed to see according to the city codes. My wife and I were in attendence at the last council meeting where Dr. Anderson was denied a chance to see twenty clients a week. The analogy that several council members used was to compare Dr. Anderson, who is a psychologist, seeing clients or patients who are troubled in some way, and that of a piano teacher, who is seeing younger members of the community in a teaching of an art, is inconceivable to me. What these two council members have tried to do is totally wrong. They based their argument solely on traffic which is a great concern to all those in our neighborhood. The mother, father etc. who is dropping their child off for a piano lession is not the same type of person who is entering our neighborhood as is the patient who is coming to see Dr. Anderson. This patient could be under stress, anxious or in some other troubled way. The result of the counseling session might produce a hostile or troubled person who may do anything. This is not the type of person that I or any member of my family want in my neighborhood. With Dr. Anderson, the matter of her convienience is what this matter is all about. How can anyone say that she can only spend two hours a day at her office. She simply wants to practice psychology at her house at the expense of her neighbors and our neighborhood without having to pay the cost of doing business. Sincerly, Paul S. Wehrmeister Joan C. Wehrmeister Z� t � �-' 0 4" - xo� qti.� a. Sri REQUEST FOR PURCHASE HASE TO: , Mayor Richards and City Council FROM: Bob Kojetin VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: February 1, 1991 AGENDA ITEM III I. B. ITEM DESCRIPTION: 2 Fairway Flowers -with Trade -In Companv Amount of Quote or &d 1. North Star Turf, Inc. $45,440.00 Trade -in 13,632.00 $31,808.00 1.- $31,808.00 2. P1.T.I. Distributing $44,340.00 Trade -in 4,700.00 $39,640.00 2.. $39,640.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR EID: North Star Turf, Inc. GENERAL INFORMATION: Trade -in of 1 1987 HF -5 Jacobsen Hydraulic mower serial x`677562109 for 2 new 5 gang lightweight fairway mowers for Braemar Golf Course. Signae Department . The Recommended bid is within budget not within bujC ljet Wallin, 4nance Director Kenneth Roslan4 City Manager 9` A. _lrl REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor Richards and Council Members FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director Park and Recreation VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF 15,000 DATE: January 30, 1991 AGENDA ITEM III' C. ITEM DESCRIPTION: ,,Ton Cargo Van Company Amount of Quote or Bid �. North Star Dodge 1. $11,028.95 2• (Hennepin County Contract #1678A0) 2, 3. 3 4. 4 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: North Star Dodge $11,028.95 GENERAL INFORMATION: Replacement for 1978 Ford Van, used by park custodian. l � J l Department The Recommended bid is X within budget not Kenneth Rosland, City Finance Director of 4 0`.A J 12 RC HASE REQUEST FOR PU TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Ted Paulfranz, Fire Chief VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE M EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: January 30, 1991 AGENDA ITEM . III. D. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Replacement Defibrillator /Monitors (2) Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Physio Control 1. $14,950 2. Matrx 2. $12,530 3. 3. 4. 4 5. 5 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Physio Control Lifepak 10, at $14,950 GENERAL INFORMATION: Portable defibrillator /monitor (Paramedic equipment) to replace existing units. Funding source would be Equipment Replacement. My recommendation is for the Physio Control unit, because the Matrx does not meet all provisions for performance criteria, particularly in service and maintenance. Our present units are Physio Control. We have had 10 years of - excellent service /support experience. Additionally, our ical Director, Dr. Crimmins, has reviewed both uni s and its ur decision. FIRE Signature Department The Recommended bid is within budget not withi bu et Wallin, Fi ce Director t enneth Rosland City Manag :6 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: November 26, 1990 TO: _. Ted Paulfranz, Fire Chief FROM: Terry Kehoe, Assistant Fire Chief SUBJECT: REPLACEMENT OF PHYSIO- CONTROL LIFEPAK 5 DEFIBRILLATOR /MONITORS I am recommending the purchase of two (2) Physio- Control Lifepak 10 defibrillator /monitor units to replace the current Lifepak 5 units now in.service. The Lifepak 5 equipment is now over ten years old and becoming more susceptible to repairs and operational failures. While these Lifepak 5 units have performed admirably, it is now time to replace and upgrade, including: pacemaker capability (external non - invasive electronic heart pacemaker) and code summary (a feature documenting on paper any monitor /defibrillation activities). In researching other similar equipment on the market, there is only one•other unit, Life Defense Plus, sold by Matrx Medical, Inc., that is designed for ALS pre - hospital use. In comparing this equipment, I found the following: * Only on weekdays „& we must send unit to Buffalo, NY ** Unit new on market July, 1990 ** *Not including $1,100 in repairs for LDP In conclusion, Physio Control has provided us with consistent and exceptional service, both in equipment operation and sales /service support since 1974. I strongly recommend we replace our equipment as soon as possible, using replacement funds, with Lifepak 10 defibrillator /monitor units. Life Lifepak 10 Defense Plus 1. Able to use our current battery system Yes No 2. Number of batteries in each unit 3 3. Batteries compatible with other EFD equipment. Yes No 4. 'Fast charge batteries Yes No 5. Code Summary (documentation of events with time/ Yes No date, ECG, shocks delivered, etc. 6. Uses compatible paper with units in service in Metro area Yes No 7. Non - invasive pacing Yes Yes 8. Portable, under 22 pounds Yes Yes 9. Non - Fade (in sunlight, etc.) ECG Scope Yes No 10. On -site service capability (24 hours a day) Yes No 11. Maintenance agreement capability Yes No 12. Free Loaner (same equipment) Yes Yes* 13. Units in service in Twin City area Yes No 14. Manufactured by Distributor Yes No 15. On market over five years Yes No ** 16. Built in United States Yes No 17. Costs: Defibrillator /monitor $8,625 each $7,465 each (includes cables, batteries, carrying case) X 2 units x 2 units $17,250.00 $14,930.00 Trade -In Two (2) Lifepak 5 S2,300.00 S2,400•.00 * ** NS'T COST TO $DIVA FIRB BDDGRT: $14,950.00 $12,530.00 * Only on weekdays „& we must send unit to Buffalo, NY ** Unit new on market July, 1990 ** *Not including $1,100 in repairs for LDP In conclusion, Physio Control has provided us with consistent and exceptional service, both in equipment operation and sales /service support since 1974. I strongly recommend we replace our equipment as soon as possible, using replacement funds, with Lifepak 10 defibrillator /monitor units. N z Cr REQUEST FOR PURCHASE O v u TO: i.iayor Richards and City Council FROM: Bob Ko j etin VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE February 1, 1991 AGENDA ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION: 6 New Golf Cars for Braemar Golf Course EZ -Go -Upper Midwest Company Amount of Quote or &d 1. EZ -Go- Upper Midwest 1_ $13,700.00 2. Golf- Car - Midwest 2. $14;950.00 3. Golf- Cars - Unlimited 3. $149994.00 4. 4.600.00 4. $13.700.00 Golf Car Midwest 6 New EZ Co Cars $181150.00 Trade -In 2 1984 gas EZ go cars 1.400.00 2 1986 gas EZ go cars RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: EZ -Go -Upper Midwest GENERAL INFORMATION' Purchase of 6 new golf cars for Braemar Golf - Course with trade -in.of 4 cars E_Z_r upper_ N1riv_ea_t 6 New'EZ Co Cars $18.300.00 Trade -In 2 1984 /EZ go cars 2.000.00 2 1986 EZ go cars 2.600.00 4.600.00 $13.700.00 Golf Car Midwest 6 New EZ Co Cars $181150.00 Trade -In 2 1984 gas EZ go cars 1.400.00 2 1986 gas EZ go cars 1.800.00 3.200.00 $14.950.00 rnif Cars Unlimited 6 New EZ Co Cars $18,894.00 Trade -In 2 1984 gas EZ go cars 1.800.00 2 1986,gas EZ go cars 2.100 -00 3.500.00 $14.;994.00 - ,Signature Department The Recommended- bid is e Within budget not within budget s Wallin. inane Director Q Kenneth Rosiand. City i VILLAGE OF.EDINA i REQUISITION NO. PURCHASE REQUISITION - ------------------------ DATE DELIVER MATERIAL TO: MATERIAL NEEDED BY: 9 t? % P.O. NUMBER SUGGESTED SOURCE OR USUAL SOURCE: !_ �,Z -- G� U pPER_ ADDRESS: QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT CHARGE ACC'T. 6 6x J� * God f - e040,1 Ni - Swf, ;re2 I3,4sXerJ lK u P1418- s - TcRRAO:�U,9Rtl FA ",01 ssl -TRAM E - �✓ - _ �� - 4;4pA® a6s Z pG ,�, Mod � o It Lv 7NO tit Airr- 141t6un11- - cii,lrruuiln %4uvlml.Lu a run ruNu nozo VVLK a1VU. VV SOURCE: AMnTTmT nr MMTAMTC L) PP659- AYIDw& r- PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY: DEPARTMENT HEAD 2.) 3.) DO NOT MARK IN THIS SPACE RECEIVED 19 APPROVED PURCHASING DEPT. EMMO E-Z-GO Division of Textron Inc. E -Z-130 Upper Midwest 5105 West 35th Street St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55426 Phone: 612/922-1550 Fax: 612/922-2944 1i tj BRAEMAR GOLF CLUB JANUARY 33, 1991- 14 0 T F.- J -- n V. q v S TOTAL ANIQUINT DUE $13,700.00 �`-,'F:`ER EASSNET. S`=- PT L A. C -7 D .'%CCEPTED BY: BRAEMAR GOLF CLUB 3"': T!7 World's Finest Utility Vehicles for Sports and Industry B2072 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE CITY OF EDINA 6364 DEWEY HILL ROAD EDINA. MN FLEET SALES PROPOSAL 55436 Date:01/25/91 Page: 1 Salesperson: 1 Estimate No: 3801 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Quantity :Item Number :List Price :Fleet Price: :Extension :Tx :Item Description , -------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - ---= 6.0 G9 -AG 4369.00 3025.00 18150.00 N 1991 GAS FLEET'MASTER > 2.0 11 0.00 700.00- 1400.00- N TRADE -INS: 1984 E -Z -GO 4WG 2.0 11 0.00 900.00- 1800.00- N TRADE -INS: 1986 E -Z -GO 4WG ------------------------------------------------------------------------=------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sub Total 14950.00 GOLF CAR MIDWEST 3350 W. HWY 13 Net Total 14950.00 BURNSVILLE, MN Sales Tax' 55337 Proposal*Total: 14950.00 612/890 -5541 GOLF CARTS UNLIMITED TOURNAMENT FLEET -SPOT LEASES -NEW, RECONDITIONED AND U` -ED MADEL I A . MN. ( .`_ 07 ) b4' -3' X43 OWNER: ARLEN MALONEY Braemar Golf Course 6364 Dewey Hill Road Edina,.Minn. 55435 Attn: Don Klingelhoets 6 This is a bid for the following carts: 6 .... GX 444...... gas ........ $3149.00 ea .............$18894.00' Trade -in 2..1984.... gas.... 900.00 ea........ .. 1800.00 Trade -in 2..]986.... gas.... 1050.00 ea............. 2100.00 Thank You , if ,Carts Unlimited Arlen Maloney 1- 507- 642 -3543 14994.00 a e� 1 �-� %� REPORT /RECOMMENDATION \• �N Q . �neroa�`•/ To: KENNETH ROSLAND From: CRAIG LARSEN Date: FEBRUARY 4, 1991 Subject: TEMPORARY CONDITIONA USE PERMIT Recommendation: Info/Background- Agenda Item # IV- A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance 0 Discussion The temporary conditional use permit process now provides that the applicant set forth the hours. per day and days per week that business activity will occur. It does not prohibit or limit when activities may occur. The provision is designed to provide flexibility in dealing with varying circumstances. The requested days and hours of business activity are reviewed during the required public hearing and may be accepted as proposed or altered or limited by the City Council. In granting a temporary conditional use permit the Council must find that the proposed activity meets the general findings for all conditional use permits and also complies with the performance standards for home occupations. (see attached excerpts of Zoning Ordinance). The Council may grant exceptions to the home occupation performance standards, but not to the general findings. I believe that we need the flexibility provided by the ordinance as now written.. Each case is likely to- present circumstances unique to the applicant and to their business. Inserting very specific requirements would likely be troublesome in practice. 4. Commission Review and Recommendation. Within 45 d fter receipt by the Planning Department of the a ee and all other information herein required, ' and substance acceptable to the Planner, the Plann' rtment shall review the application and other inform ovided by the applicant and forward a report to the ion. The Commission shall review the report of the P1 ng Department and send its recommendation to the Council. Conditional Use 5. City Council Hearing and Decision. Upon request of the Permit. Section Planner, Manager or applicant, and after review and recommendation by 5. the . Commission, the Council shall, conduct a public hearing regarding• the application. The hearing shall be held not .later than 60 days after the date of the recommendation by the Commission. A notice of the date, time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published in the official newspaper of the City at least ten days prior to the, date of the hearing. A similar notice of hearing shall be mailed at least ten days before the date of the hearing to each owner of property situated wholly or partly within 500 feet 'of the tract to which the application relates insofar as the names and addresses of such owners can reasonably be determined by the Clerk from records maintained by the Assessor. After hearing the oral and written views of all interested persons, the Council shall make its decision at the. same meeting or at a specified future date. No new notice need be given for hearings which are continued to a specified future date. The Council shall not grant a conditional use permit unless it finds that the establishment, maintenance and operation of the use: (a) will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals and general welfare; (b) will not cause undue traffic hazards, congestion or parking shortages; (c) will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment, or decrease the value, of other property in the vicinity, and will not be a nuisance; (d) will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of:other property in the vicinity; (e) will not create. an excessive burden on parks, streets and other public facilities; (f) conforms to the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the district in which it is located as imposed by this ordinance; and (g) is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 4 -14 } SECTION 7. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO ALL DISTRI EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE STATED A. General. No building or structure shall be cted, constructed or placed on any property in the City, and no bu' ing or structure or property in the City shall be used for any p ose, unless in full compliance with the restrictions and requirem s of this ordinance and other applicable ordinances of the City. - - B. Trash Storage. 1. All Properties Exce Sin le Dwelling Unit and Double Dwelling Unit Buildings. All olid waste material, debris, refuse, garbage or similar material hall be kept within closed containers designed for such purpos Said containers shall not be located in the front yard and sha be completely screened from view from all lot lines and streets. 2. Sin le lling Unit.and Double Dwel I ing Unit Buildin s. All solid waste terial, debris, refuse,, garbage or similar material shall be kep ithia closed containers designed for such purpose. Said contai s shall not be located in the front yard and shall 'not be visibl rom the front lot line. C. ellin Units Prohibited in Accessory Buildin s Temporar Buildi Trailers and Recreational Vehicles. No accessory building to ary building, trailer or recreational vehicle in any district shall b sed for a dwelling unit or units, except for accessory buildings ich are specifically allowed for residential use by this ordinance. D. Customary Home Occupations as an Accessory Use.' 1. Customary home , occupations which are permitted as an accessory use by this ordinance shall comply with the following conditions: (a) only the residents 'of the- dwellling unit are employed on the lot or within the dwelling unit; (b) no exterior structural modifications are made to change the residential character and appearance of the lot or any buildings or structures on the lot; (c) no loading or unloading or other outdoor activities, except parking, shall occur; (d) no signs of any ind shall be used to identify the use; (e) all parking ,demands generated by the use shall be accommodated within the accessory garage and the normal driveway 7 -1 e area and shall not at any one time occupy more than two parking spaces in parking areas. required for multiple residential buildings; (f) no more than ten automobile trips weekly by individuals other than the residents of the dwelling unit shall be generated to the dwelling unit as a result of the use; and (g) no sale of products or merchandise shall occur on the. lot or within any structures or buildings on the "lot. 2. Permitted customary home occupations include, but ar not limited to, the following occupations if, and only during suc imes as, they comply with all of the above conditions: (a) dressmakers, tailors and seamstresses; (b) in single dwelling unit and double welling unit buildings only, ,music and dance teachers prov' ing instruction to not more than five individuals at a time; (c) artists, sculptors and authors; (d) insurance agents, brokers, architects and similar professionals who typically conduct ient meetings outside of the dwelling unit; (e) ministers, rabbis and iests; (f) photographers pro ding service to one customer at a f� time; (g) salespersons provided that no stock in trade is maintained on the or in the building or structure on the lot; and (h) in s. gle dwelling unit and double dwelling unit buildings onl rental of rooms for residential occupancy to not more than t persons per dwelling unit in addition to the permanent sidents of the dwelling unit. 3. • Th following uses have a tendency to increase in size or intensity yond the conditions imposed by this ordinance for home occupatio and thereby adversely affect residential properties. Therefor the following shall specifically not be permitted as custom home occupations: (a) barber shops and beauty.parlors; (b) repair services of all kinds, including, without limitation, auto repair and painting, appliance repair and small engine repair; 7 -2 A. o e ineu REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & Council Members From: Kenneth Rosland Date: February 1, 1991 -Subject: STRONG BEER /WINE LICENSE DISCUSSION Recommendation: Agenda Item # Iv.c. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Discussion That the requested attached information regarding strong beer /wine licensing be reviewed and discussed at the February 4th Council Meeting. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor & Council Members FROM: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: STRONG.BEER /WINE LICENSE DATE: February 1, 1991 As requested by the City Council, I submit the following brief report regarding the relationship of alcohol content in beer and wine. Information for this report was retrieved from the quality control lab of Stroh's Brewery. Beer is measured by,percentage of alcohol by weight. Wine is measured by percentage of alcohol by volume. In order to compare equals, one must add one percent of alcohol content to beer. Three -two beer, as it is called, measures anywhere from 2.8% to 3.1% of alcohol. Six percent or strong beer actually measures from 3.7% to 4.0% of alcohol. Conversion Table Actual Adjustment 3.2 Beer 2.8 -3.1% 4.0 12 ounces = .48 ounces of alcohol Strong Beer 3.7 -4.0% 5.0 12 ounces = .60 ounces of alcohol Wine 14% 0 4 ounces = .56 ounces of alcohol Wine 14% 0 3 ounces = .42 ounces of alcohol Blood Alcohol Content Table Quantity- Level Strong Beer 30 ounces (2 1/2 beers) 0.075 BA 3.2 Beer 36 ounces (3 beers) 0.075 BA Wine 12 ounces (3 wines) 0.075 BA Legal Limit = .1 I ADVISORY POLL RESULTS NOT BINDING ON, ONLY ADVISORY TO, EDINA CITY COUNCIL City of Edina Hennepin County, Minnesota November 6, 1984 INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTERS: Voters desiring to vote in favor of the question, put a cross mark (X) in. the square �. opposite the word YES. Voters desiring to vote against the question, put a cross mark (X) in the square opposite the word NO. ❑ YES ON -SALE WINE LICENSES "Shall the City of Edina issue on -sale licenses. to NOqualifying sit -down restaurants to sell wine, in conjunction with the sale of food ?" F I CITY OF EDINA GENERAL ELECTION RETURNS NOVEMBER 6, 1984 Page 6 - -- VOTING PRECINCT N1 N2 Jp3 #4 R5 86 #7 #8 #9 #10 N11 #12 #13 N14 #15 N16 N17 #18 %' /#19 TOTAL CITY OF EDINA MAYOR C Wayne Courtney 726 770 1,171 1,133 956 1,097 1,073 1,269 970 1,050 1,249 1,106 838 1,194 1,465 1,060 344 313 962 18,146 COUNCIL MEMBER -John Senior, Jr. 383 374 507 520 434 412 538 732 436 510 651 492 451 729 559 570 179 112 455 .9,044 Leslie C. Turner 477 584 948 693 756 880 736 944 694 701 906 826 463 825 1,158 632 246 240 646 13,355 Peggy Kelly 535 582 925 873 730 873 846 834 727 835 868 790 670 .762 1,101 782 216 233 746 13,928 ADVISORY POLL ON -SALE WINE LICENSES ,Yes 890 856 1,067 1,102 963 1,170 1,101 1,184 975 1,007_ -1,263 1,084 1,034 1,201 1,599.. 1,177 500 373 1,151. - 19,691:' No 200 260 _397 -322 311 363 361 479. _ 383 323 ; 440 364 251 385 438 357 101 142 264 6,141 STATE GENERAL ELECTION FIRST: PUBLIC LANDS Yes 809 826 1,125 1,059 1 „014 1,141 1,074 1,260 1,018 1,032 1,258 1,097 869 1,179 1,526 1,129 408' 410 1,017 19,251 No 247 260 275 298 216 307 301 315 279 245 341 280 312 358 380 289 129 92 298 5,222 SECOND: SCHOOL FUNDS Yes 791 804 1,114 1,054 962 1,120 1,078 1,222 999 1,001 1,229 1.061 866 1,151 1,453 1,130 429 408 1,002 18,874 No 264 278 300 301 270 316 297 344 291 268 369 318 323 368 420 296 112 103 313 5,551 F I' �ZN A o e' in N o Aj �� • RPOM��O/ lase REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: GORDON L. HUGHES Date: FEBRUARY 4, 1991 [Subject: WILDLIFE COMMITTEE REPORT Recommendation: Info /Background: Agenda Item # IV. D. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion In accordance with your request, Bob Kojetin, Dave Velde, Craig Swanson, Curt Finch and I comprised a committee to study wildlife issues in Edina. The focus of our study was wildlife /human conflicts. We did not study any other issues concerning wildlife. The committee called upon several experts who provided facts concerning wildlife /human conflicts. In particular, we consulted with the Minnesota Department of Health concerning public health issues, Mr. Arden Aanestad, an Edina resident who served on the Minnesota River Valley Deer Management Task Force, and Mr. John Parker, Area Wildlife Manager with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. ti FINDINGS During calendar year 1990, calls for service /advice concerning wildlife comprised 27% of our animal control calls. Sixty -six percent related to domestic animals (mostly dogs). Exhibit 1 provides a breakdown of the calls received by month and species. It is important to note a "call" does not necessarily constitute a "complaint ". Calls include questions regarding wildlife, reports concerning dead animals on roadways or reports concerning injured or sick animals. Although we cannot document the precise number, we believe that there is a relatively equal distribution between complaints and animal welfare related calls. Wildlife populations do not present a significant public health risk to our residents. Likewise, we cannot find any evidence that the public health risk will increase in the future. Lyme disease and rabies are the most significant diseases which may be transmitted by way of wildlife. Exhibits 2 and 3 summarize our findings as to Lyme disease and rabies respectively. Rabies is extremely rare in humans (0 -3 cases reported annually in the United States). The existence of the disease in animals, both wild and domestic, in Edina is almost non - existent. Lyme disease, on the other hand, has become a relatively common disease. Many of us know someone who has contracted this potentially serious disease. The principal vector of Lyme disease is the deer tick. The life cycle of this tick is rather complicated. However, it is important to note that the deer tick does not rely solely on deer for its dissemination. As time goes by, researchers are discovering that more and more species, both wild and domestic, serve as a host for the deer tick. We can find no evidence that controlling Edina's deer population, or any other wildlife population, will have any effect on the risk of contracting Lyme disease. The only other significant wildlife related disease which we can identify is a variety of roundworm which is found in raccoons. The presence in humans seems to be mainly related to the attempted domestication of raccoons. We do not expect a risk of increased incidence of this disease with our wild raccoon population. Probably the most significant public health risk associated with wildlife populations is vehicular accidents. White tail deer are the only wildlife species that represent the potential for serious damage /injury to a vehicle and its occupants. Reported deer /auto accidents for the past few years are as follows: 1984 17 1985 18 1986 12 1987 ? 1988 5 1989 6 1990 10 For comparison purposes, the total number of all reported vehicular accidents in Edina in 1990, was 1302. Therefore, the chance of vehicular /deer collisions is remote and not a significant danger to our residents. Wildlife warning reflectors have been employed in certain areas of the State which exhibit high incidence of deer /auto collisions. To be effective, these reflectors must be closely spaced and must be cleaned regularly. There is also some evidence that the reflectors may lose effectiveness with time as deer become accustomed to them. Animal Control Services Animal control efforts focus primarily on domestic animals. The City, however, does provide some services relative to wild animals. First, we provide an ombudsmen and referral service to callers with wildlife related questions. Second, we assist in the removal of certain wild animals, i.e. raccoons, from resident's homes. Third, we remove and dispose of carcasses of road kills from public property. At the present time, we do not trap and remove "nuisance" animals. Such animals include garbage can raiding raccoons, chimney dwelling raccoons and squirrels, garden /flower /shrub preying rabbits and woodchucks. with the exception of suspected animal bites, we no longer lend live traps to residents for trapping nuisance animals. This practice was stopped several years ago in that staff spent a considerable amount of time retrieving traps from residents and relocating captured animals. In addition, finding suitable habitat for relocation has become increasingly difficult. Live traps are now available for rental from private services. Several small businesses have been established in recent years which will remove nuisance animals for residents. We routinely refer residents to these businesses for the removal of those animals described earlier. The results have been positive. Goose Removal Project Last summer the University of Minnesota completed the fourth annual trapping and relocation of Canada geese in Edina. Two years remain on our contract with the University. This program has been successful in stabilizing goose populations in Edina. The program is expensive - approximately $50 per captured goose. We believe that the program must be continued indefinitely to maintain stable populations. Canada goose populations are particularly well suited to capture and relocation programs -- they are gregarious, become flightless and can be easily captured during the summer, and can be transported with relatively low mortality to underpopulated parts of the country. Unfortunately, very few species of wildlife share these characteristics. Population Control of White - Tailed Deer The following findings are based upon our review of the Minnesota River Valley Deer Management Task Force's "Final Report and Recommendations" (Exhibit 4) and our interviews with Mr. Aanestad and Mr. Parker. Population control of deer can be accomplished only by killing individual animals. For a variety of reasons, population control cannot be accomplished by trapping and relocating animals in a manner similar to our goose program. Attempted population control in Edina alone would be of very questionable value. Most of our deer population is part of a larger herd located outside of the City, principally in Hyland Park in Bloomington. Yet, portions of Edina provide suitable habitat which will support a certain number of deer (i.e. the carrying capacity). Therefore, individual animals killed in Edina would likely be replaced by animals migrating from Hylands. At the present time, neither Hennepin County Parks nor the City of Bloomington is pursuing a population control program in Hylands Park. If a program were pursued in Hylands Park, the most feasible methods of population reduction in Edina would be realized through sharp - shooting by marksmen employed by the City or another agency or by trapping and killing animals. The use of marksmen would depart from a long standing City policy of not granting permits for the discharge of firearms. The public safety risks associated with such a program would require careful study before implementation. At the present time, the policy of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is that deer population control is the responsibility of the cities. Although the D.N.R. will provide some technical services and must issue permits for certain control measures, it will not coordinate or implement a deer control program in Edina. Artificial Feeding Artificial feeding of wildlife is a somewhat controversial topic. Our research suggests that artificial feeding is not necessary for the welfare of any wildlife population in Edina. Conversely, the prohibition of feeding will probably not result in the reduction of any of our wildlife populations. In particular, it is doubtful that the winter concentration of waterfowl at Point of France would be reduced if feeding was prohibited. The attraction at Point of France is open water which is a rare commodity in winter. Food sources are not scarce for a free flying waterfowl population and.the prohibition of feeding in Edina probably would not reduce the attraction of Point of France for water fowl. Although feeding does not affect deer populations, it may result in an increase in deer /human conflicts. For example, food plots may cause deer to move across roadways with an increased frequency and may attract deer to areas where they will damage ornamental vegetation. The City of Bloomington has enacted an ordinance prohibiting deer - ---- f-eed-ng in certain area--of the City. Apparently - this- ordinance is not being aggressively enforced but may discourage some residents from feeding deer in areas impacted by deer predation of shrubs and ornamentals. Population Control of Raccoons It may be possible to reduce temporarily the raccoon population in certain areas of the City. Such a program would require an aggressive trapping program. Like deer, the relocation of animals is probably not feasible and therefore, trapped animals would be destroyed. Similar programs have apparently been attempted by some cities but were discontinued due to the high cost of the program. In addition, long term population reduction may be doubtful. The selective removal of nuisance animals is the more common approach. C_7 Beaver Control The City continues to issue special permits for the removal of beavers which are obstructing creeks and causing potential flooding. Conclusion and Recommendations o We cannot document any significant public health and safety reasons which justify the reduction of any wildlife populations in Edina. The City should continue to monitor new developments in public health research, especially Lyme disease, to determine if certain control measures are warranted in the future. o Our Canada goose program has been successful in reducing the nuisance aspect of this population. We recommend continuation of the program. o The problem associated with the white tailed deer population in Edina is predation on shrubs and other ornamental plants. Although this problem is not particularly wide spread, some property owners have been hard hit. We recommend that the D.N.R. be urged to produce educational materials as to the use of repellents and other techniques for damage control. Repellents are effective but require ongoing use throughout the growing season. o Some residents have suggested that they are intimidated or feel endangered by the presence of deer. We do not believe that this constitutes a reason for population control. o Artificial feeding is not necessary for wildlife welfare and may contribute to some of the problems associated with deer. We are very concerned with our ability to enforce a prohibition of artificial feeding throughout the City. We, therefore, recommend an ordinance prohibiting feed on City owned properties as a means of demonstrating our concern with artificial feeding. We also recommend that "About Town" provide information concerning the problems with artificial feeding. o Reducing Edina's deer population is dependent upon reducing Bloomington's.deer population. We recommend that the Council approach this issue cautiously. Deer control measures in other cities have been very controversial and we would expect a similar controversy here. We recommend that, at the present time, discussions concerning a larger scale deer control program should be pursued at the staff level. 0 Discussions involving Bloomington, Hennepin Parks and Eden Prairie would be appropriate. o We believe that our present service level relative to wild animal problems is reasonable and responsive to our residents' expectations. Private businesses now offer a variety of services concerning nuisance animals. Additional services offered by the City would necessitate an increase in our staff complement. o Reduction of the raccoon population in certain areas of Edina may be possible. Prior to implementing such a program, we recommend continuation of the present practice of removing nuisance animals by private contractors. Increased dissemination of public education materials would also be appropriate prior to initiating a more aggressive program. o We recommend that the City investigate the feasibility of installing wildlife reflectors in identified deer crossing areas. ORDS, tfoRSCS SUBJECT: 411MA - dW7Pa[ CALLS,O[C 8� Meu No✓ 40 NO /MO JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JUNE JULY AUG. SEPT. 'OCT. NOV. DEC. TOTAL Dos5' 7q g2 89 I09 123 123 132 q -7 10-7' 64 65 -71 1136, A,1$ 2 '1 8 y �s9' 00 3 0 -- c) G. G 2 2 l 1 76 6 .I i 3� Q3 9CO . 9G 12- 139 1qq Is ► 116 125 82 72 10 7 15 3 S RAaUW6 19 ! 5 1 �) 33 15 I 26 30 35 I- 4 217 MER 7 21 2 Z 0 7 5 O 3 1 5 5 36 QumL8 q I 10 3 (o S q 3 2 y 3 3 q legulr 9 i 1 2 2 6 e 5 3 10 o 2 2 `IS ° D U U 2Z- 2 G 3 Z O 1 G 17 E" 2 0 2 11 15 Iq 0 S O U Z 59, w,Z,2 5 5 3 13 6 29 r y 5 ro5 25 15 3q sS 75 2Z q5 47 S9 51 32 17 TOTAL 12Z q 13 9 /93 2?-q 2-17 1 17,1 /9/ 1/19 /07 • 48 &7 '16°1 o` 7 2 )l % ,• r� x H bd H H EXHIBIT 2 LYME DISEASE Lyme disease is a disease caused by a bacteria which can be carried by deer ticks. The disease is not usually fatal but can cause a variety of symptoms including fever, chills, headache, dizziness, muscle aches, joint pain and chronic fatigue. The disease also affects the cardiac and nervous system and can lead to arthritic conditions and /or heart arrythmia. Early diagnosis of the disease aids in successful treatment using antibiotics. .The deer tick is carried by .a large variety of warm blooded animals. Not only white tail deer but also .mice, birds, woodchucks, dogs, cattle, etc are hosts for the deer tick. It is now believed that the adult deer tick will feed on a larger host such as a dog before dropping off and laying eggs on the ground. The nymph stage is believed to feed on smaller animals such as rodents and birds. The nymph stage of the tick -is very small, about the size of a pin head and is extremely difficult to detect.. It is believed that birds play a major role in dissemination of the deer tick. It would be impossible to eliminate the risk of contracting Lyme disease by eliminating the animals which play a role in the life cycle of the deer tick. In addition, the mere presence of deer ticks in the environment does not mean the risk -for Lyme disease is present. The tick must harbor the bacteria which cause Lyme disease and not all ticks have the bacteria. Some areas of the country have a very low incidence of the bacteria in the ticks, less than 10 %, and other areas have as high as 90% of the ticks positive for the bacteria. People in Minnesota should be aware of the areas where deer tick are present and of the potential for contracting Lyme disease when visiting - those areas. Generally, those areas are northeastern Minnesota, the St. Croix River Valley and southeastern Minnesota along the Mississippi River. Surveillance for Deer Tick in the Metropolitan Area is occurring through the Metropolitan Mosquito Control District. It appears that the District will continue their surveillance efforts in the future. To this date the only area in Hennepin County where the deer tick has been recovered is near. Coon, Rapids Dam. Northern Ramsey, Northern Washington and Anoka County are other areas where the deer tick have been 'found. Analysis will be performed to determine whether these deer tick are carrying the bacteria responsible for Lyme Disease. The Public Health response to Lyme Disease is and will continue to be, public awareness and early diagnosis of the disease. Any attempt to eliminate the host animals such as mice, birds or deer is not practical. EXHIBIT 3' RABIES Rabies in humans in the United States is extremely rare with 0 -3• cases per year reported since 1980. In animals, both wild and domestic, about 4700 -7100 cases are reported each year in the United States. _, In Minnesota, 100 -200 cases of animal rabies have been reported annually since 1985. The skunk is the predominant animal with rabies in Minnesota, followed by cattle. There have only been two reported rabid raccoons in Minnesota since 1985, one in 1986 and one in 1989. The Minnesota Department of Health tests over 2000 animals per year for rabies. A localized outbreak of rabies in racoons has been developing in the mid atlantic region of the United States affecting Pennsylvania, Delaware and Virginia. This outbreak is under surveillance by the Center for Disease Control. Anoka County is the only area in the Metropolitan Region which has reported a rabid racoon. The existence of rabies in racoons in the Metropolitan area is virtually non existent. The risk for humans with respect to rabies is not from wild animals but rather from domestic animals which have been in contact with wild animals. Vaccine is available and in use for protecting domestic animals from rabies. The vaccine is less effective for non traditional pets such as skunks and raccoons. Keeping of these animals is discouraged. Most communities have pet licensing laws which require proof of rabies vaccination as a condition for licensing pets. The existence of vaccination requirements for domestic pets is an important prevention tool in reducing human exposure to rabies. MINNESOTA VALLEY DEER MANAGEMENT TASK FORCE FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS JUNE 1990 EXHIBIT 4 CONTENTS I Section I. PREAMBLE 1 Section II. TASK FORCE OBJECTIVES 1 Section III. TASK FORCE ORGANIZATION 1 Section IV. DECISION - MAKING PROCESS 2 Section V. STUDY AREA 2 Section VI. i ISSUES 2 Section VII. RECOMMENDATIONS 3 Section VIII. IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS AND AGREEMENTS 9 Section Ix RATIFICATION 10 APPENDICES 11. A. ORIGINAL PROPOSAL FOR A MINNESOTA VALLEY DEER MANAGEMENT TASK FORCE B. FRAMEWORK AND GROUNDRULES C. MEETING SUMMARIES AND LIST OF HANDOUTS DISTRIBUTED AT TASK FORCE MEETINGS D. SHORT -TERM RECOMMENDATIONS E. POSITION PAPER ON PUBLIC HUNTING F. ALTERNATIVE DEER CONTROL PROGRAM G. INFORMATION ON USE OF WILDLIFE WARNING REFLECTORS H. LIST OF CONTACTS FOR INFORMATION ON DEER CONTROL METHODS I. LIST OF TASK FORCE. ORGANIZATIONS DEER MANAGEMENT TASK FORCE FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS May 1990 SECTION I. PREAMBLE This document contains the final report and recommendations of the special Task Force established at the request of the Cities of Burnsville, Bloomington, Eagan and Mendota Heights to examine issues regarding the management of the white- tailed deer populations in these four cities, with particular focus on the Minnesota River Valley. We, the Task Force members, conducted a comprehensive analysis of urban deer management issues in a series of 18 meetings and one field trip during the period from April 1989 to May 1990. We represent a very wide diversity of opinions and viewpoints on what we found to be complex and controversial issues. While our diversity often led to profound disagreement on significant issues, we believe that our efforts to reach agreement were sincere and that we have accomplished what reasonably could be expected. While the study area was narrowly defined, proceedings of the Task Force may assist other communities in determining policies for similar areas. SECTION II. TASK FORCE OBJECTIVES The Task Force objectives, as proposed by the DNR, and approved by the four cities, were: 1) identify the problems associated with deer populations in the Valley, 2) review past and proposed deer management by wildlife agencies, 3) review existing and potential deer population control methods and recommend methods to be used in the Valley, 4) recommend desireable deer population densities, and 5) recommend practical methods for implementing a comprehensive deer management program in the lower Minnesota Valley. (See Appendix A for additional information regarding Task Force formation.) SECTION III. TASK FORCE ORGANIZATION In order to promote constructive discussion of the issues, the Task Force developed and adopted a Framework and Groundrules document. (See Appendix B.) This document identified Task Force participants, working relationships, media contacts, scope, objectives and schedule. The Task Force membership was selected to.insure that the broadest possible range of opinions on the issues would be represented. (See Appendix I.) It was not the original intent of the Task Force to structure its membership to represent opinions on the issues in proportion to opinions held by the general public, and we make no express or implied claim to that effect. - 1 - The task force used the services of a neutral facilitator supplied from the staff of the Department of Natural Resources to conduct the meetings, write meeting summaries and provide written drafts of Task Force decisions. Summaries of all Task Force meetings and a listing of supplemental information distributed by Task Force members at those meetings are included in Appendix C. SECTION IV. DECISION -MAKING PROCESS The Task Force adopted a consensus decision - making process. In this context, consensus means unanimous consent. If even one member of the Task Force could not agree to a proposal or recommendation, then the report indicates that. the Task Force was unable to reach consensus on that item. In such cases where it is relevant, the pros and cons of the issue are presented. These should not be considered as majority /minority findings because the Task Force did not determine them through a voting procedure nor attach weight or value to them. It is important for the reader to understand the reasons for the Task Force use of consensus decision - making. There are two reasons why the Task Force did not use a vote or majority - minority decision process. The first is that the Task Force was constituted as a fact - finding, study group and not as a representative body whose votes would reflect the will of the general public, such as a city council's would. The second is that the Task Force, as a voluntary body, could not prevent the minority in any voting situation from working outside the group to delay implementation of or otherwise undermine any recommendations of the majority. In short, a vote was seen as contributing to polarization and renewed conflict. The disadvantage of the consensus method is that for some key issues there is no recommendation. However, in those cases where the Task Force did reach consensus, it represents a significant mandate for action, considering the diversity of the membership. SECTION V. STUDY AREA The Task Force defined the geographic study limits as the area included within the municipal boundaries of Bloomington, Burnsville, Eagan and Mendota Heights. The implication of such a definition is that the recommendations of the Task Force, unless expressly restricted, apply to deer management activity within, but not beyond, this area. For the most part, the Task Force focused on deer management activity on the state and federal land in the lowest reach of the Minnesota River Valley at the confluence with the Mississippi River. In setting the framework for its deliberations, however, the Task Force decided to include areas outside of the river valley itself because some of the issues are focused in these other areas. SECTION VI. ISSUES During the first and second meetings of the Task Force, members listed. their concerns regarding the deer population within the study area. (See -2- Summary of 4/26/89 and 5/3/89 meetings in Appendix C.) These concerns became the basis for the specific issues which the task force addressed. In general these issues are: deer population objectives, deer population control methods, deer /vehicle collisions, and deer impacts on vegetation. SECTION VII. RECOMMENDATIONS During a series of four meetings in April and May, 1989, the Task Force developed a list of short -term recommendations to apply only to the deer management activities which would occur in 1989 -1990. (See Appendix D.) Those recommendations were transmitted to the four cities in June, 1989, and were, for the most part, implemented. In September, 1989, the Task Force reconvened and focused on issues related to a more long -term program for deer management. The results of the fact - finding and discussions conducted by the Task Force during the 9 -month period since then are presented in this section. The recommendations are not presented in order of priority. A. Recommendations on Deer Population Densities Deer population densities, usually expressed in number of deer per square mile, are the main indicator used by resource managers to describe the size of the deer population. ISSUE What should the deer population density objectives be for the study area and how should they be determined? RECOMMENDATIONS 1) The Task Force recognizes the expertise of the resource management agencies to set numerical deer population density objectives for units within the study area. 2) The Task Force recommends that the following factors be carefully considered by those agencies in the development of those density objectives: a. deer vehicle collisions (because of data limitations should be considered on an area -wide rather than site specific basis) b. natural habitat browsing (considering abundance, distribution and diversity of browse) c. ornamental shrub, crop depredation (assessed in terms of number of complaints) d. deer health (reproductive rates are prime indicator) e. natural population variability (consider long -range trends) f. ecosystem management objectives (as determined by resource management agencies) g. consumptive and non - consumptive uses of deer by people h. land use diversity i. community tolerance levels j. artificial feeding k human:healtli (not a sigcant f idoiai''presen-t time) -3- 1. accuracy and variability of deer census data B. Deer Management Methods, The Task Force generated a list of various methods used to manage deer populations and behavior as follows: Indirect Direct Fences/movement barriers Fertility control Repellants Trap and transfer natural vegetation Trap and kill chemical/non- chemical Hunting reflectors Sharpshooting noisemakers Reintroduce predators visual Habitat manipulation Artificial feeding No action C. Recommendations-on Population Control Methods. In determining which methods from the list generated in Item B. could be used to control deer populations, the Task Force adopted a two -step process. The first step was to develop a list of all methods which could possibly have an effect on deer populations. The second step was to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of the methods on the list. ISSUE What methods are gQssible to achieve population density reduction objectives within the study area? The following list of os�, sible methods was identified: No action Reintroduction of predators Habitat manipulation Artificial feeding Fertility control Hunting Controlled, limited deer kill program Sharpshooting Trap and kill Trap and transfer ISSUE Based on the above list of os� sible methods, which methods are effective and A a le and how should they be used? FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS No Action - this method involves letting "nature take its course" and not intervening in deer populations. Recommended Use: not very likely to be effective method area -wide or long -term; may be suitable on short -term basis and/or within certain units of study area. -4- Reintroduction of Predators - this method involves artificially reintroducing natural deer predators such as wolves and coyotes to the study area. Recommended Use: not suitable; rationale: social unacceptability, cost, insufficient habitat for predator species. Habitat manipulation - this method involves creating additional habitat or enhancing existing habitat to increase biological carrying capacity for deer. Recommended Use: not suitable; opportunities for significant habitat manipulation are limited; however, municipalities should encourage preservation of natural deer movement corridors and community open space in order to protect critical deer habitat and reduce the need for population control as much as possible. Artificial Feeding - this method involves the use of food supplements or planting food crops on public lands to increase biological carrying capacity. Recommended Use: not effective for population control; may be suitable in limited situations to affect deer movement and distribution. (See item F in this section for additional information.) Fertility Control - this method "involves the use of chemical agents administered to deer to reduce or prevent fertility. Recommended Use: This method cannot be implemented at this time because there is no drug currently approved for use on free - ranging deer. The state and federal agencies should monitor developments in this field for possible implementation of this method in the long term. Hunting - this method involves the use of private citizens who apply for and are given permission to hunt deer according to state regulations on public lands within the study area. Recommended Use: the Task Force was unable to reach consensus on whether public hunting should or should not be used to achieve deer population control objectives within the study area. A thorough discussion of the Task Force deliberations. on this issue is included in a Position Paver attached as Appendix E. Alternative Deer Control Program - this method was developed by the Task Force as a three -year experimental alternative to public recreational hunting on the state park and federal refuge within the study area. In general, it requires the DNR and USFWS to select, based on defined criteria, a limited number of private citizens who would then be instructed to kill deer in these areas, using prescribed methods, in order to help meet deer population control objectives. Recommended Use: Approved for use on state and federal public lands within the study area according to the details as developed by the Task Force in Appendix F. The Task -5- Force will have on -going review responsibilities. (See also Implementation Recommendations A and B in Section VIII.) Sharpshooting - this method involves the shooting o methods approved law enforcement officers using appropriate which are not legal for those participating in either public hunting or the alternative deer control program. The purpose of this method is to help maximize the reduction of the deer population in effective, humane and safe manner. Recommended use: to be used as appropriate to conditions including: location, population reduction needs, availability of personnel, and public safety. Trap and Kill - this method involves live- trapping deer and then killing them. It is generally considered to be a high -cost alternative to sharpshooting or hunting in areas where human safety considerations would preclude the use of sharpshooting or hunting and a relatively few deer need to be removed. Recommended Use: to be used on a case -by -case basis in the most humane way, according to DNR regualtions, only when the DNR has established that there has been a documented problem, after all appropriate non- lethal methods, have been exhausted, and on small parcels of public or private land. Trap and Transfer - this method involves live- trapping of deer and then transporting and releasing them in locations with suitable habitat and carrying capacity. Recommended Use: not suitable on a large -scale basis, may be suitable in limited special circumstances; very stressful to deer, not cost effective in most cases, limited areas for releasing deer. D. Recommendations on Deer/Vehicle Collisions, ISSUE What methods should be implemented, and by whom, to reduce the incidence of deer /vehicle collisions within the study area? RECOMMENDATIONS Local units of government should implement the following: 1) Increase compliance with the DNR Car -Kill Survey and/or Salvage Reports, if not currently participating in these programs. 2) Consult local law enforcement people to have them identify specific locations with a high frequency of deer /vehicle collisions. 3) Install the following at high frequency collision locations: a. Wildlife warning reflectors - a study in Minnesota indicates 80 -90% reduction in deer /vehicle collisions using this method. (See Appendix G.) b. Informational (caution) and reduced speed zone signs - consideration should be given to highlighting signs during periods when seasonal deer movement activity is highest (times available from DNR). 4) Issue press releases in local media (e.g. local cable TV, local newspapers, radio) during seasons with increased deer movement indicating most hazardous locations, any special reduced speed zones in effect, general information about driving methods when deer are encountered on roads. 5) Cut overhanging or obscuring foliage back from road shoulders at high frequency collision locations to improve drivers' view of road shoulder and ditch area. 6) Discourage citizens from providing food for deer in proximity to high frequency collision areas. 7)'Consult with or refer inquiries for information to DNR Area Wildlife Office, Shakopee, Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge Headquarters, Bloomington, and Office of Traffic Engineering, Minnesota Department of Transportation. (See Appendix H.) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION - RELATED TO THIS ISSUE: The official records on deer /vehicle collisions in the study area are imprecise. Records of animal/vehicle collisions kept by Mn/DOT do not distinguish between the type of animals which are struck. Where available, the DNR uses deer /vehicle accident information as an input element to deer population prediction models. Following a law change in 1988, the responsibility for recording and removing deer killed by vehicles has been transferred from the DNR to public road maintenance authorities. In order to provide continuing information about the deer population from this source, the DNR has requested public road maintenance authorities to complete what are known as salvage reports for all deer carcasses recovered. E. Recommendations on Damage to Vegetation. ISSUE What methods should be implemented, and by whom, to reduce the incidence of deer damage to ornamental shrubbery, landscape nursery stock, and commercial crops within the study area? RECOMMENDATIONS 1) Local units of government should refer people who express problems with deer damaging their vegetation to the currently available information pamphlets, videos,and demonstration projects on control methods. Excellent information on the most effective methods, in particular fencing and repellants, is available from the DNR Area Wildlife Office in Shakopee, the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge Headquarters in'Bloomington, the Minnesota Extension Service "Dial U" service, and the University of Minnesota Landscape Arboretum in Chanhassen. (See Appendix H for list of contacts for information.) -7- 2) Local units of government should discourage deer feeding by persons who are experiencing vegetation damage from deer. 3) At seasonally appropriate times, local units of government and state and federal wildlife management agencies should sponsor public information sessions and issue news releases regarding effective methods available for reducing deer damage to vegetation. F. Discussion of general recommendation regarding artificial deer f n Recommendations on deer feeding specific to other issues addressed by the Task Force are indicated above (e.g. see recommendation on vegetation damage). The principal findings from the discussion were that: an ordinance prohibiting artificial deer feeding would be unenforceable (Boulder, Colorado example); artificial feeding could either reduce or increase deer damage to ornamental shrubbery depending on the amount and location of feed provided; artificial feeding could lead to increased movement of deer across roads, depending again on location; and food plots for deer on. public land in Ft. Snelling State Park or the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge would conflict with the management goals of these units, would generally reduce available habitat for wildlife, and at best would provide food for only the early portion of the critical winter feeding period. In discussing this issue the Task Force also recognized the difference between baiting deer with feed to increase their visibility in conjunction. with public park interpretive programs and providing food to meet all or a portion of deer nutritional requirements. ME SECTION VIII. IMPLEMEENTATION TSCOMMENDATIONS AND AGREEME The following recommendalis implementation of the recommendations ted in Section VII above. A. The DNR will request from the four cities a three -year variance from the ordinances which prohibit firearms discharge in order to implement the alternative deer control program on a three -year experimental basis. DNR and USFWSin of this consultation t the Task determined by the Force. B. In April of each year beginning in 1991, the DNR will convene the Task Force for the purpose of reviewing and discussing d ogress made in meeting Task Force recommendations, the proposed matters a the management objectives for the coming y an group may decide. C. Individual members of the Task Force agree to support and encourage others to support the adoption and implementation of the Task Force Report and Recommendations by the city councils. SECTION DL RATIFICATION members and alternates of the Deer Management Task We, the undersigned Force, do hereby ratify the foregoing report and recommendations as representing our best effort to address the issues which led to our formation. l`Itc (� '1Z vim+ ' �rTSnellr'n T4- rK w�ce. JV�w D ge— ' - N�'TN%dRK f f0� Hi✓irlsL� GcaA�C��%`� <M�NNf?G) i y ( /yi ►�tiP� �}tc� �. r cent. I L� r �C��i ><t U "Ile /�'/1- lz n! ?T >. l✓, �� is �� �, y �� -10- r� c* op1nsA. O REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KENNETH ROSLAND Agenda Item # -1-Y • E From: CRAIG LARSEN Consent C Information Only x Date: FEBRUARY 4, 1991 Mgr . Recommends 1-1 To HRA Subject: 1990 CENSUS [Z I To Council POPULATION COUNTS Action n Motion C Resolution i ! r Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Info /Background Attached are the 1990 census population counts which we have received for both Hennepin County and the City of Edina. When comparing the 1980 figures with the most recent counts, it appears that the Edina population has remained stable while Hennepin County has experienced a 9.7% increase. 1980 Edina 46,073 Henn. Co. 941,411 1990 Change 46,070 .0% 1,032,431 +9.7% The preliminary population count we had received from the Census Bureau last fall was 46,012. The most recent figure, 46,070 is a result of the past census local review the City submitted to challenge the preliminary count. a As more detailed information is received from the Census Bureau, we will forward that data on to you. i FORM: 0-69 MINNESOTA Bureau of the Census PAGE 71 OF 93 1990 Population Totals Department of Commerce ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IThis table provides 1990 census population counts for states and governmental) (units. Since these counts provide only totals for the states and local) Igovernmental units, they are not suitable for redistricting. As required bY! (Public. Law 94 -171, the Bureau of the Census will provide redistricting countsi Iat the block level for all states and the District of Columbia. The countsi (will be released on,a state -by -state basis beginning in early 1991 and ending; Iby April 1, 1991. I IThe population counts set forth herein are subject to possible correction for; (undercount or overcount. The United States Department of Commerce is 1considering whether to correc -t these counts and will publish corrected Icounts, if any, not later than July 15, 1991. ------------------------------=---------------------------------- - - - - -- (011091' G 0 V-. E R N M E �N, T A L U N I T ----- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- -------------------------------------------- - - - - -- !Number of I CODE I I NAME I I Persons ------ - - - - -- ----------------------------------------------- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- PL 27 1015 Donaldson city -------------------------------- - - - - -- .5.7 PL 27 1020 Donnelly city --a.a. as =ss=a=ss=ssassas=s=sss=-- aaaaaa 221 PL 27 1025 Doran city ------------------------------------ - - - - -- ',E PL 27 1030 Dover city =---------- ---- ---- --- -- ---- ---- ---- - - -- -- 416 PL 27 1035• Dovray city ----------------------------------- - - - - -- 6C PL 27 1040 Duluth city ----------------------------------- - - - - -- 85,493 PL 27 1045 Dumont city •-___-_•-_ _________••_______ ____ ___ _ _ ____ 12E PL 27 1050 Dundas city ----------------------------------- - - - - -- 473 PL 27 1055 Dundee city sass= aassasasasasaa :aaaaassaaasaaasaaaaas 107 PL 27 1060 Dunnell city'---------------------------------- - - - - -- 187 PL 27 1063 Eagan city ---------------------------------=-- - - - - -- 47,409 PL 27 1065 Eagle Bend city =___-- •_____ ____ ___ __ ______ ____ _ _ _ ___ 524 PL 27 1070 Eagle Lake city ------------------------------- - - - - -- 1,703 PL 27 1072 East Bethel city =__-= = = =a =--- =____-- _- •- _- •_- __ -_ - -- 81050 PL 27 1075 East Grand Forks city ------------------------- - - - - -- 8,658 PL 27 1080 East Gull Lake city --------------------------- - - - - -- 687 PL 27 1085 Easton city 229 PL 27 1090 Echo city ------------------------------------- - - - - -- 304 PL 27 1094 Eden Prairie city _____ __ __ _____ __ _•____-- •--- _ - - - - -- 39,311 -PL 27 1095 Eden Valley city ------------------------------ - - - - -- 732 PL 27 1100 Edgerton city --------------------------------- - - - - -- 1;106 PL 27 1105 Edina city 46,070 PL 27 1110 Effie city ------------------------------------ - - - - -- 130 PL 27 1115 Eitzen city =____-_-_- _•-- -- ----- -- -- -- ----- --- ----•_ 221 PL 27 1120 Elba city ------------------------------------- - - - - -- 220 PL 27 1125 Elbow Lake city ------------------------------- - - - - -- 1,186 PL 27 1130 Elgin city =___•_________ ________ __ ____ ____ ____ • -• -_ -. 733 PL 27 1135 Elizabeth city -------------------------------- - - - - -- 152 PL 27 1140 Elko city 223 PL 27 1145 Elk River city -------------------------------- - - - - -- 11,143 FORM: D -69 MINNESOTA Bureau of the Census PAGE 20 OF 93 1990 Population Totals Department; of Commerce ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IThis table provides 1990 census population counts for states and governmentall (units. Since these counts provide only, totals for the states and locall (governmental units, they are not suitable for redistricting. As required byl )Public Law 94 -171, the Bureau of the Census will provide redistricting countsl lat the block level for all states and the District of Columbia. The counts) twill be released on a state -by -state basis beginning in early 1991 and endingl 1 by April 1,1991. I . I IThe population count's set forth herein are subject to possible correction l forl )undercount or overcount. The United States Department of Commerce isl )considering whether to correct these counts and will publish corrected) )counts, if any, not later than July 15, 1991. 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- (011091) G 0 V. E R N M E N T A L U N I T ----- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- -----------------------=------------------ - - - - -- )Number ofl I ------ CODE I - - - - -- I NAME I ----------------------------------------------- - - - - -- I Persons i ----- - - - - -- MC 27 051100 Roseville township ---------------------------- - - - - -- 162 MC 27 051105 Sanford township 169 MC 27 051110 Stony Brook township -------------------------- - - - - -- 151 CO 27 053 Hennepin County =__=== = =as= aaaaa :aaaaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaa 1,032,431 MC 27 053090 Hassan township ------------------------------------- 1,951 CO 27 055 Houston County -------------------------------- - - - - -- 18,497 MC 27 055005 Black Hammer township =-------- ------- ----- ----- - ---- 318 MC 27 055010 ------------------------- - - - - -- Brownsville township --------------------------------- 408 MC 27 055015 Caledonia township = as sasaaasaasassaassssaasaaasasaaa 529 MC 27 055025 Crooked Creek township ------------------------ - - - - -- 310 MC 27 055035 Hokah township -------------------------------- - - - - -- 551 MC 27 055040 Houston township ______ ________ ________ __ _______ ____= 423 MC 27 055050 Jefferson township ---------------------------- - - - - -- 136 MC 27 055055 La Crescent township = sasassasaaaasasaaaasaaasssaaaaa 1,427 MC 27 055065 Mayville township ----------------------------- - - - - -- 436 MC 27 055070 Money Creek township -------------------------- - - - - -- 429 MC 27 055075 Mound Prairie township _ ___ _______________ _____ ______ 581 MC 27 055080 Sheldon township ------------------------------ - - - - -- 276 MC 27 055085 Spring Grove township = assasaaaaaaasssasassssasasassa 567 MC 27 055095 Union township -------------------------------- - - - - -- 334 MC 27 055100 Wilmington township --------------------------- - - - - -- 520 MC 27 055105 Winnebago township aaaaaaaa =aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.aa.a 271 MC 27 055110 Yucatan township ------------------------------ - - - - -- 335 CO 27 057 Hubbard County -s sans= asaaaaaasasssaasssaassaasasaaaa 14,939 MC 27 057005 Akeley township ------------------------------- - - - - -- 332 MC 27 057015 Arago township --------------------------------- - - - - -" 485 MC 27 057020 Badoura township = ----- 87 MC 27 057023 Clay township --------------------------------- - - - - -- 58 MC 27 057025 Clover township aas ss aaaaa sa- asaaaassassssasaasaasaaa 101 MC 27 057030 Crow wing Lake township ----------------------- - - - - -- 187 VJ �° REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # Iv-11- From: GORDON L. HUGHES Consent Information Only Date: FEBRUARY 4, 1991 Mgr. Recommends To HRA Subject: CONFIRMATION OF a To Council STRATEGIC PLANNING MEETING DATE - Action ❑ Motion MARCH 9, 1991 ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance 0 Discussion Recommendation: Info /Background: Traditionally, the Council and Staff have conducted the annual Strategic Planning Retreat on the second Saturday in March. If you wish to follow this practice, the date for this year's retreat would be March 9, 1991. The retreat generally begins at 8:00 A.M. and adjourns at noon. o e p ades REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KENNETH ROSLAND From: DAVID A. VELDE Date: FEBRUARY 4, 1991 Subject: 1991 Public Health Nursing Services Recommendation: Agenda Item # Iv. I Consent 0 Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA FT To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Staff recommends entering into a contract with the Bloomington Division of Public Health for the provision of Public Health Nursing Services for calendar year 1991. The contract cost will be $125,397.00. Info /Background: The 1991 Public Health Nursing contract is $13,508.00 higher than 1990. This increase is due to an increase.in utilization of Home Health services and Health Promotion services. These services are delivered to older residents, an age group which continues to grow in Edina. Approximately 22% of Edina residents are over 60 and about 16% of Edina residents are over 65 years of age. Also, it should be noted that this contract is $7,914.00 over the 1991 budget for public health nursing services. It should be noted that the projected cost for the public health nursing services is based upon 1990 utilization data. This data shows an increase of 479 home visits during the first nine months of 1990. This level of increased activity accounts for most of the increased contract cost. The projection for the total cost of public health nursing services delivered to Edina for 1991 is $239,915.00. The contract with Bloomington will provide $125,397.00 to support non reimbursible services to Edina residents and the remaining $114,518.00 will be fees, grants, and third party payers such as Medicare, Medicaid, and insurance. This table shows the distribution of costs for public health nursing services for the cities served by Bloomington: Local Support Reimbursements Bloomington 814,422.00 317,699.00 Edina 125,397.00 114,518.00 Total Cost 1,132,121.00 239,915.00 Richfield 124,012.00 86,582.00 210,594.00 Fairview Southdale Hospital was contacted about providing these services in Edina and program data was provided to the Hospital in July 1990. The hospital remains interested in becoming involved in community health services, but was unable to submit a proposal to Edina for 1991. Discussions will continue with Fairview Southdale Hospital to determine what role they may serve in the delivery of these services in the future. /1NA, mil\ Cn p \H�RPORN•�9� �aee REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Ken R o s l a n d Agenda Item #im— J From: Janet Chandler Consent Information Only ❑ Date: February 4, 1991 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Apartment Recycling 0 To Council Action Motion • ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Acknowledge receipt of report. Info /Background: Edina ordinances require that, as of January 1, 1991, apartments and condominiums must have recycling programs for their residents. Garbage haulers also must offer recycling service to their customers and provide the City with recycling tonnage reports on a quarterly basis. All apartments and condominiums have now reported that their recycling programs are set up. Further details are given in the report. -over- NOTIFICATION AND REPORTS -- BUILDING MANAGERS AND OWNERS In September, a letter was sent to all apartment owners, condominium associations and /or building managers informing them of the ordinance requirements. A report form was included, to be returned to City Hall when recycling arrangements were completed. As these reports were received, the information was verified by checking with the haulers. STATISTICS The reports yielded the following information: Number of apartment complexes ... 61 units...4042 Number of condominiums .......... 30 units ... 3330 Total ....... 91 Total..7372 (Note: buildings with 8 units or less have been included in the weekly recycling service provided by the City.) Of the current thirteen Edina trash haulers, nine are providing recycling service for these buildings, including one recycling -only hauler. START -UP DELAYS Many building managers and haulers rushed to set up programs in December, resulting in a crunch of activity. Containers could not be supplied fast enough for all to be in place by January 1. In some cases, it was difficult to locate building owners or managers, causing delays in notification. Since nearly everyone, once notified, seemed to be making an honest effort to comply, no attempt was made to cite owners for non - compliance during January. PROGRAM RESULTS It's too soon to have any tonnage information. The first quarterly reports from haulers are not due until April. Early information from a few haulers and managers indicates that programs have started fairly smoothly. n RESIDENT COMMENTS Some apartment residents have called with questions on sorting or preparation of recyclables. Since programs vary from building to building, these questions are referred to the building managers. One person called to inquire if she really was required by ordinance to participate. All other apartment residents who called seemed very pleased to have recycling programs in their buildings. FUTURE REPORTS Plans are to report to Council at mid -year with information gathered from building owners, managers and haulers. i 'r r �N�"I BPBBwt� REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: JOHN WALLIN 4 w FINAiNCE DIRECTOR Date: FEBRUARY 1, 1991 Subject: ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITIES IN LIEU OF BOND Recommendation: Agenda Item -Y--A. 1 &. 2 Consent 0 Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends 0 To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Approve the assignments of securities as good and sufficent collateral of public funds made by the City's depositories First Bank Edina and Marquette Bank Minneapolis. Info /Background According to State Statute, every depository must provide collateral or other security to the City to protect it against financial loss because of the depository's failure or mismanagement. The assignment authorizes the City to sell all or as much of the collateral as is needed to reimburse it for any amount lost through default of the institution. Copies of the resolutions are attached. RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITIES IN LIEU OF BOND - FIRST BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina,- Minnesota approves the assignment by its depository, First Bank National Association, of the following securities, as good and sufficient collateral for the City of Edina Public Funds deposited in said depository: Description Rate Due Par Value U S Treasury Notes 7.25 Notes G -93 7.250 7/15/93 $3,460,000.00 U S Treasury Notes 7 7/8 Note M 92 7.875 3/31/92 300,000.00 $3,760,000.00 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 4, 1991, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 5th day of January, 1991. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk ff r. RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITIES IN,LIEU OF BOND - MARQUETTE BANK MINNEAPOLIS BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota approves the assignment by its depository, Marquette Bank Minneapolis, of the following securities, as good and sufficient collateral for the City of Edina Public Funds deposited in said depository: Description U S Treasury Notes T92 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ") SS Rate Due Par Value 7.875 08/15/92 $500,000.00 CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk.for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 4, 1991, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 5th day of January, 1991. c Marcella M. Daehn. City Clerk 02 -04 -91 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 2010 - 000 -00 1006 2617 30- 2010 - 000 -00 1031 2267 10- 2010 - 000 -00 10- 4504 - 510 -51 10515 50- 2010 - 000 -00 50- 2010- 000 -00 50- 2010 - 000 -00 10- 2010 - 000 -00 30- 4202 - 781 -78 50- 4248 - 841 -84 1000 30- 4262 - 782 -78 835975 2682 30- 4540 - 782 -78 6771 2848 10- 4504 - 621 -62 10- 4204 - 600 -60 10- 4504 - 648 -64 9775 2807 60- 1300 - 021 -20 10- 4202 - 640 -64 2809 10- 4202 - .640 -64 2885 10- 4202 - 640 -64 2812 30- 4262 - 782 -78 36021 2774 26- 4202 - 681 -68 50- 4514- 822 -82 1311 2684 1 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 035701 01/24/91 1,250.00 ATHLETIC -TECH CORP COMPUTER SOFTWARE 1,250.00 * 035702 01/24/91 690.50 MN SOIL & PEAT POTTING SOIL 690.50 * 035703 01/24/91 2,690.00 BEST COPY BUSINESS CARDS 035703 01/24/91 20.00 BEST COPY BUSINESS CARDS 2,710.00 035704 01/24/91 246.00 FLAHERTYS HAPPY TYME MIX 035704 01/24/91 383.60 FLAHERTYS HAPPY TYME MIX 035704 01/24/91 195.60 FLAHERTYS HAPPY TYME MIX 825.20 035705 01/24/91 22.00 CAROL SHAPIRO REFUND 22.00 035706 01/24/91 40.20 RHONDA ROSE REIMBURSEMENT 40.20 035707 01/24/91 210.00 TOM WASSMUND SNOW PLOW CONTRACT 210.00 *. 035708 01/24/91 32.80 TODD UNIFORMS INC UNIFORMS 32.80 * 035709 01/24/91 472.36 VALLEY VIEW ASSOC REPAIR PARTS 472.36 * 035710 01/24/91 179.80 EDINA ATHLETIC ASSN REIMBURSEMENT 179.80 035711 01/24/91 47.25 EDINA ATHLETIC ASSN REIMBURSEMENT 47.25 035712 01/24/91 119.70 OSWALD FIRE HOSE GENERAL SUPPLIES 119.70 * 035713 01/24/91 1,550.00 ENGCO CONSTR CO CONSTRUCTION 1,550.00 * 035714 01/24/91 35.00 MN PIE SCHOOL 35.00.E 035715 01/25/91 30.00 EDS /REGISTRAR WEED SCHOOL 035715 01/24/91 30.00 EDS /REGISTRAR SCHOOL 60.00 * 035716 01/24/91 22.75 SPRUCE COMPANY LAUNDRY 22.75 * 035717 01/24/91 54.95 PHONOGETIC PRODUCTN MGMT TAPES 54.95 035718 01/24/91 15.73 BANK SYSTEMS SUPPLIES 02 -04 -91 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 2010 - 000 -00 1006 2617 30- 2010 - 000 -00 1031 2267 10- 2010 - 000 -00 10- 4504 - 510 -51 10515 50- 2010 - 000 -00 50- 2010- 000 -00 50- 2010 - 000 -00 10- 2010 - 000 -00 30- 4202 - 781 -78 50- 4248 - 841 -84 1000 30- 4262 - 782 -78 835975 2682 30- 4540 - 782 -78 6771 2848 10- 4504 - 621 -62 10- 4204 - 600 -60 10- 4504 - 648 -64 9775 2807 60- 1300 - 021 -20 10- 4202 - 640 -64 2809 10- 4202 - .640 -64 2885 10- 4202 - 640 -64 2812 30- 4262 - 782 -78 36021 2774 26- 4202 - 681 -68 50- 4514- 822 -82 1311 2684 1 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -04 -91 PAGE CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 035718 01/24/91 153.73- BANK SYSTEMS SUPPLIES 50- 4514 - 822 -82 1311 2684 035718 01/24/91 153.73 BANK SYSTEMS SUPPLIES 50- 4514 - 822 -82 1311 2684 035718 01/24/91 31.45 BANK SYSTEMS SUPPLIES 50- 4514 - 842-84 1311 2684 035718 01/24/91 31.45 BANK SYSTEMS SUPPLIES 50- 4514- 862 -86 1311 2684 78.63 * 035719 01/24/91 90.00 TELEDYNE TOTAL POWER REPAIR WORK 10- 4540 - 560 -56 327379 2451 90.00 * 035720 01/24/91 375.00 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGN STOP SIGNS 10- 4542 - 325 -30 32714 2113 035720 01/24/91 375.00 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGN STOP SIGN 10- 4542 - 325 -30 32713 2112 750.00 * 035721 01/24/91 51.08 ASSOC HANDLING INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504- 783 -78 8141 1363 51.08 * 035722 01/24/91 469.69 NEENAH FOUNDRY CO CATCH BASIN 41- 4552 - 900 -90 23494 2784' 469.69 * 035723 01/24/91 2,400.00 VEAP HUMAN SERVICES 10- 4201- 504 -50 2,400.00 * 035724 01/25/91 15.00 MN GFOA MEMBERSHIP 10- 4204 - 160 -16 035724 01/24/91 15.00 MN.GFOA DUES 10- 4204 - 160 -16 30.00 * 035725 01/24/91 4,000.00 CORNERSTONE ADVOCACY HUMAN SERVICE 10- 4201 - 504 -50 4,000.00 * 035726 01/24/91 50.00 RICK CARLSSON SERVICES 30- 4224 - 781 -78 50.00 * 035727 01/24/91 859.33 PAT GREER SERVICES 30- 4201 - 781 -78 859.33 * 035728 01/24/91 100.00 RICK NAGLER PERFORMANCE 1/17/91 30- 4224 - 781 -78 100.00 * 035729 01/24/91 45.00 TRI COUNTY LAW DUES 10- 4204 - 420 -42 45.00 * 035730 01/24/91 20.00 ASSN OF MN DUES 10- 4204 - 460 -46 20.00 * 035731 01/24/91 113.22 AT &T PHONE 23- 4256 - 611 -61 113.22 * 035732 01/24/91. 20.00 CAROL FOURRE REFUND 30- 3505 - 000 -00 20.00 * 035733 01/24/91 37.96 BUREAU OF TRAINING MATERIALS 10- 4504 - 520 -52 37.96 * 035734 01/24/91 425.00 SHADAWN FENCE CO HOCKEY GOALS 10- 4504 - 648 -64 2806 425.00 * 2 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 035735 01/24/91 31.00 PAUL KRESSER CLASS CANCELED 31.00 * 035736 01/24/91 28.00 KRISTEN LOYE CLASS CANCELED 28.00 * 035737 01/24/91 32.00 JERRY DOMBROWSKI CLASS CANCELED 32.00 * 035738 01/24/91 19.00 ANDREA MEDCALF CLASS CANCELED 19.00 * 035739 01/24/91 150.00 MANFRED GOODMAN CLASS CANCELED 150.00 * 035740 01/24/91 32.00 BERNADETTE JOHNSON CLASS REFUND 32.00 * 035741 01/24/91 308.25 PARK VACUUM CENTER VACUUM 308.25 * 035742 01/24/91 959.75 LMCIT SERVICES 959.75 * 035743 01/24/91 105.00 BLOOMINGTON HEATING FURNACE REPAIR 105.00 * 035744 01/24/91 1,900.00 LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERV HUMAN SERVICES 1,900.00 * 035745 01/28/91 450.00 STRATEGIC AD INC ADVERTISING 450.00 * 035746 01/28/91 14.52 WILLIAM KREBS REFUND 14.52 * 035747 01/25/91 23.52 LJ RUBBER STAMP STAMPS 23.52 * 035748 01/25/91 75.95 JACK MCCLARD /ASSO SERVICE WORK 75.95 * 035749 01/25/91 92.10 NORTHWESTERN SERV REPAIRS 92.10 035750 01/28/91 77.45 BUDGET LIGHTING REPAIR PARTS 77.45 035751 01/25/91 148.14 PARSONS ELECT CO REPAIR WORK 148.14 035752 01/25/91 298.50 NAME BRAND SPORTS JACKETS 298.50 035753 01/28/91 395.00 LANO EQUIP EQUIP RENTAL 02 -04 -91 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 23- 3500 - 000 -00 23- 3500 - 000 -00 23- 3500 - 000 -00 23- 3500 - 000 -00 23- 3500 - 000 -00 23- 3500 - 000 -00 27- 4504 - 667 -66 1892 2553 10- 4201 - 600 -60 304485 27- 4248 - 667 -66 1892 2903 10- 4201- 504 -50 27- 2010 - 000 -00 194207 2902 40- 2010 - 000 -00 10- 4516 - 440 -44 40497 2520 10- 4504 - 560 -56 65309 2585 28- 4248 - 702 -70 24103 2466 28- 2010 - 000 -00 19830 2766 10- 4540 - 540 -54 109775 2142 10- 4504 - 622 -62 631119 10- 2010 - 000 -00 3684 2669 3 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 035754 035755 035756 035757 035758 035759 035760 035760 035760 035761 035762 035763 035764 035765 035766 035767 035768 035769 035770 035771 01/25/91 01/25/91 01/28/91 01/25/91 01/25/91 01/25/91 01/25/91 01/25/91 01/25/91 01/25/91 01/25/91 01/25/91 01/25/91 01/25/91 01/28/91 01/28/91 01/28/91 01/28/91 01/28/91 01/28/91 AMOUNT 395.00 31.78 31.78 * 14.40 14.40 * 12.00 12.00 * 950.00 950.00 * 676.00 676.00 * 137.98 137.98 * 600.00 600.00 600.00- 600.00 * 63.77 63.77 * 100.00 100.00 * 200.00 200.00 * 460.62 460.62 * 31.13 31.13 * 611.20 611.20 * 1,189.50 1,189.50 31.99 31.99 6.05 6.05 315.00 315.00 150.00 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION VAN- O -LITE INC NATL CUSTOM ENTERP ARTISTIC FLOORS TYPE MASTER GRAPHIC HOFFERS INC AT &T ESPECIALLY FOR ESPECIALLY FOR ESPECIALLY FOR SIEGEL DISPLAY PROD SHOW UP CASAA LUNDS DORIE BARMAN MPLS HEALTH DEPT LIZ GEREBI JAY BRASK BUREAU OF BUSINESS RAMSEY CO PTAC JEFF FREDERICK BULBS BATTERY CARPET METAL PRINTING WINDOW REPLACE REPAIRS RENTAL RETAL RETAL OFFICE SUPPLIES ADVERTISING GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOE REMOVAL CULTURAL EXPO PRO SERVICES SERVICES UNIFROM ALLOWANCE DUES SCHOOL TRAINING 02 -04 -91 PAGE 4 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 15211 2337 40- 4540- 801 -80 14672 1480 10- 2010 - 000 -00 7475 2356 30- 4600 - 781 -78 5925 2260 11- 4201 - 127 -12 28- 4248 - 702 -70 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 27- 4516 - 667 -66 45792 2459 27- 4214 - 667 -66 12336 2933 27- 4504 - 667 -66 2528 2626 50- 4201 - 821 -82 11277 10- 4280 - 504 -50 10- 2010 - 000 -00 6982 30- 3505 - 000 -00 10- 4266 - 420 -42 10- 4204 - 420 -42 10- 4202 - 420 -42 10- 4202 - 420 -42 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 035772 035773 035774 035775 * * * * ** 035777 035778 035778 035779 035779 035780 035781 035782 035783 035784 035785 035786 035787 035788 * * * * ** 01/28/91 01/28/91 01/29/91 01/28/91 AMOUNT 150.00 * 55.00 55.00 * 52.70 52.70 * 333.00 333.00 * 89.92 89.92 * CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION G &J PATCH /PIN FAST FRAME LIZ SUNNE ALEXANDER BATTERY N UNIFORM ALLOWANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES SERVICES EQUIP REPLACE 02 -04 -91 PAGE 5 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 2010 - 000 -00 001689 30- 4516 - 781 -78 692584 2942 30- 3505 - 000 -00 10- 2010 - 000 -00 4614 1311 01/29/91 200.00 DON PERUSSE REIMBURSEMENT 30- 2010 - 000 -00 200.00 * 01/29/91 523.00 EDINA POLICE CAR WASHES 10- 2010- 000 -00 01/29/91 87.00 EDINA POLICE CAR WASHES 10- 4296 - 560 -56 610.00 * 01/29/91 179.50 FLEET FARM BINOCULARS 10- 4901 - 420 -42 01/29/91 500.00 FLEET FARM BINOCULARS 10- 4902 - 436 -42 679.50 * 01/29/91 900.00 W SUB MEDIATION CTR HUMAN SERVICES 10- 4201- 504 -50 900.00 * 01/29/91 10.00 MN MAYOR ASSN DUES 10- 4206 - 100 -10 10.00 * 01/29/91 820.00 MN REC /PARK ASSN MEMBERSHIP FEES 10- 4204 - 600 -60 820.00 * 01/29/91 5,761.38 KUNDE CO INC OAK WILT PROGRAM 10- 2010 - 000 -00. 5,761.38 * 01/29/91 130.56 MUSEUM SERVICE REPAIRS 27- 4248 - 662 -66 3314 2540 130.56 * 01/29/91 141.60 METRO SALES INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 27- 2010 - 000 -00 286468 3002 141.60 *. 01/29/91 184.85 A -1 FOAM SPECIALTIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 27- 2010 - 000 -00 3223 2319 184.85 01/29/91 3,710.00 PLBG /HTG REPAIR HOOK UP UTILITY 25- 4900 - 013 -29 583 2620 3,710.00 01/29/91 218.00 EMI REPAIR PARTS 30- 4540 - 782 -78 35884 3005 218.00 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA 225.21 CHECK REGISTER BROS. CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 035A21 01/24/91 195.71 ADT SECURITY SYS. ALARM SERVICE 01/24/91 36.00 195.71 BROS: INC. * * * * ** 035A29 01/24/91 549.33 ALBINSON SUPPLIES BROS. INC. 549.33 035B30 01/28/91 9.22 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 035A39 01/25/91 177.66 ALTERNATOR REBUILD HOSE REEL INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 177.66 " 01/24/91 .17.60 * * * * ** 035A53 01/24/91 84.48 AMERICAN SHARECOM TELEPHONE 035A53 01/24/91 47.95 AMERICAN SHARECOM TELEPHONE GENERAL SUPPLIES 035B30 132.43 10.50 BERTELSON 035A54 01/25/91 149.71 AAGARD WASTE REMOVAL 30.24 BERTELSON 149.71 INC. DISKETTE * * * * ** 01/29/91 7.18 BERTELSON BROS. 035B03 01/28/91 17.00 BENSON OPTICAL SAFETY GLASSES 035603 01/28/91 .23.50 BENSON OPTICAL SAFETY GLASSES 01/25/91 130.88 40.50 BROS. INC. * * * * ** 035B27 01/29/91 248.33 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 035827 01/29/91 330.75 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 035B27 01/29/91 236.25 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 815.33 * , * * * * ** 035B30 01/24/91 225.21 BERTELSON BROS. INC. SUPPLYS 035B30 01/28/91 15.17 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GLUE 035B30 01/24/91 36.00 BERTELSON BROS: INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 035B30 01/24/91 49.02 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 035B30 01/28/91 9.22 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 035B30 01/28/91 149.01 . BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 035B30 01/24/91 .17.60 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 035B30 01/28/91 20.24 BERTELSON BROS..INC' . GENERAL SUPPLIES 035B30 01/25/91 10.50 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 035B30 01/25/91 30.24 BERTELSON BROS. INC. DISKETTE 035830 01/29/91 7.18 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 035B30 01/29/91 138.70 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 035B30 01/25/91 130.88 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 035B30 01/28/91 2.56 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 035B30 01/24/91 262.43 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 035B30 01/25/91 49.28 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 035630 01/25/91 109.38 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 02 -04 -91 PAGE 6 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 30- 4304 - 782 -78 2847 10- 4570 - 260 -26 707710 2457 40- 4504 - 801 -80 7122 2576 10- 2010 - 000 -00 10- 4256 - 510 -51 30-4250- 782 -78 10- 2010 - 000 -00 438965 2672 10- 2010 - 000 -00 438966 2.671 50- 4626 - 822 -82 50- 4626 - 842 -84 50- 4626 - 862 -86 10- 2010 - 000 -00 29155 2206 10- 2010 - 000 -00 629156 2206 10- 4504 - 200 -20 632168 10- 4504 - 420 -42 637780 2711 10- 4504 - 420 -42 640421 10- 4504 - 420 -42 637857 2711 10- 4504 - 420 -42 636554 10-4504-420-42 640442 10- 4504 - 510 -51 10- 4504 - 540 -54 634304 2436 10- 4504 - 600 -60 640647 10- 4504 - 600 -60 640427 2991 10- 4516- 510 -51 640441 10- 4516 - 510 -51 10- 4516- 510 -51 638246 28- 4516- 701 -70 636801 2635 30- 4516 - 781 -78 638199 2936 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -04 -91 PAGE 7 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 1,262.62 * * k k k k k * ** -CKS 035B32 01/25/91 8.23 BEST LOCK OF MPLS KEYS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 11384 2674 035832 01/24/91 152.75 BEST LOCK OF MPLS LOCK SET 10- 4540 - 540 -54 11385 2422 160.98 * * k k ** k k k k - C K S 035653 01/29/91 210.00 BAKER POOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 783 -78 33624 2835 210.00 * k k k k* k * ** -CKS 035899 01/25/91 17.00 BRAEMAR PRO SHOP PROMOTION 27- 4214- 667 -66 3515 2934 035699, 01/24/91 100.00 BRAEMAR PRO SHOP RENTAL CLUBS 27- 4504 - 667 -66 3508 2900 117.00 * * * k * * k * ** -CKS 035C01 01/24/91 343.08 C & S DISTRIBUTING COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 116524 2601 035C01 01/29/91 172.64 C & S DISTRIBUTING COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 116967 2717 035C01 01/24/91 185.61 C & S DISTRIBUTING COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 116482 2605 701.33 * kkk * *k * ** -CKS 035C04 01/29/91 2,695.65 CAMPBELL SPORTS SHIRTS /AWARDS 27- 4214 - 667 -66 2452 2,695.65 * k k k k k k * ** -CKS 035C07 01/24/91 2,732.61 CARGILL INC. DE -ICING SALT 10- 2010 - 000 -00 682774 035C07 01/24/91 1,317.22 CARGILL INC. DE -ICING SALT 10- 2010 - 000 -00 682773 035C07 01/28/91 1,331.98 CARGILL INC. SALT 10- 4538 - 318 -30 685723 8325 035C07 01/28/91 1,362.61 CARGILL INC. SALT 10- 4538 - 318 -30 685227 8328 035C07 01/28/91 2,703.37 CARGILL INC. SALT 10- 4538 - 318 -30 684465 8328 9,447.79 * k k k* k k * ** -CKS 035C12 01/29/91 32.75 CORNER MARKING CO OFFICE SUPPLIES 27- 4516 - 661 -66 7874 2911 32.75 * * k k k k k * ** -CKS 035C23 01/24/91 69.00 CORE RESTORE OFFICE SUPPLIES 27- 4516 - 661 -66 018460 2839 69.00 * k k k* k k * ** -CKS 035C25 01/29/91 ' 48.00 CHAPIN PUBLISHING ADVERTISING 30- 4214 - 781 -78 3004 48.00 * k k* k k k * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA * ** -CKS CHECK REGISTER 30- 4214 - 781 -78 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 035C33 01/24/91 292.40 CITY OF EDINA WATER 035C33 01/24/91 27.10 CITY OF EDINA WATER 035C33 01/24/91 254.56 CITY OF EDINA WATER 035C33 01/24/91 27.10 CITY OF EDINA WATER 035C33 01/24/91 94.60 CITY OF EDINA WATER 035C33 01/24/91 27.10 CITY OF EDINA WATER 40- 4504 - 803 -80 3867 722.86 * 40- 4540 - 803 -80 k k * * * k 2645 035C35 01/29/91 201.60 CITYLINE ADVERTISING 201.60 * k k k* k k 035C49 01/29/91 550.00 COMPUTERLAND NETWORK TRAINING 550.00 * kkkkk k 035C62 01/25/91 380.00 C WAYNE COURTNEY SERVICES 380.00 * k k* k k k 035D07 01/29/91 29.65 D.C. HEY CO. SERVICE CONTRACT * k k k k k 29.65 * 035D31 01/25/91 427.43 DAVIES WATER EQUIP GENERAL SUPPLIES 035D31 01/25/91 415.60 DAVIES WATER EQUIP GENERAL SUPPLIES 035D31 01/25/91 427.56 DAVIES WATER EQUIP REPAIR PARTS 1,270.59 * kkkkk * . 035D43 01/24/91 39.78 DELANO ERICKSON ARCH CONSTRUCTION * k k * k k 39.78 * 035D51 01/24/91 212.00 DETERMAN WELDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 212.00 * 035D52 01/25/91 115.50 DISCOM OF MN INC RADIO SERVICE 035D52 01/25/91 31.50 DISCOM OF MN INC RADIO REPAIRS 147.00 * kkkkk k 035D85 01/24/91 1,289.70 DUFFEY PAPER CO. PAPER 1,289.70 * kkkkk k 02 -04 -91 PAGE 8 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 2010 - 000 -00 10- 2010 - 000 -00 10- 2010- 000 -00 10- 2010- 000 -00 50- 2010- 000 -00 50- 2010 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 30- 4214 - 781 -78 775 3006 * ** -CKS 10- 4504- 507 -50 180719 * ** -CKS 10- 4202 - 490 -49 81645 2524 1004 10- 4248 - 440 -44 81440 2524 * ** -CKS 30- 4201- 782 -78 10- 4504- 510 -51 016840 2554 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 30- 4288 - 781 -78 216195 * ** -CKS 40- 4504 - 803 -80 3866 2655 40- 4504 - 803 -80 3867 2670 40- 4540 - 803 -80 3840 2645 * ** -CKS 60- 2010 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS 10- 4504- 507 -50 180719 10- 4248 - 440 -44 81645 2524 10- 4248 - 440 -44 81440 2524 * ** -CKS 10- 4504- 510 -51 016840 2554 * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -04 -91 PAGE 9 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 035D98 01/24/91 724.75 DCA INC FEE FOR SERVICE 10- 21010- 000 -00 42339 724.75 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 035E02 01/24/91 440.74 E KRAEMER & SONS INC FILL MATERIAL 40- 2010 - 000 - 00.16448 7094 440.74 * '- * * * * ** * ** -CKS 035E20 01/24/91 85.00 ECOLAB PEST ELIM. SERVICE CONTRACTS 30- 4288 - 782- 78- P02719 85.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 035E69 01/24/91 66.12 ELSMORE AQUATIC UNIFORMS 30- 4262 - 782 -78 013645 2624 66.12 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 035E75 01/25/91 300.00 EMPLOYEES CLUB GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 500 -50 .300.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 035F11 01/24/91 1,904.73 FEED RITE CONTROL WATER CHEMICALS 40- 4622 - 805 -80 151204 7342 1,904.73 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 035F19 01/29_/91 1,316.00 FIRST TRUST FISCAL AGENT 10- 1145 - 000 -00 1,316.00 * * * * ** � * ** -CKS 035F26 01/28/91 177.45 - FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL JET NOZZEL 40- 2010- 000 -00 4196 1898 177.45 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 035F70 01/24/91 638:00 FRIDEN ALCATEL MAINTENANCE 10- 4290 - 510 -51 638.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 035G09 01/28/91 444.00 GOVT TRAIN SERV CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 8432 444.00 * _ * * * * ** * ** -CKS 035G22 01/24/91 329.86 GENERAL BINDING LAMINATING SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 520 -52 329.86 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 035G30 01/25/91 74.00 GENERAL SPORTS SOCCER BALLS 74.00 035G32 01/24/91 105.00 GOPHER .STATE 1 CALL CALL LOCATES 105.00 * * * * ** 035G42 01/29/91 326.61 GIL HEBARD GUNS AMMO 035G42 01/29/91 189.00 GIL HEBARD GUNS TARGERTS 515.61 035G44 01/25/91 100.00 GLEN SIPE PIANO SERV SERVICE CONTRACT 100.00 035G46 01/24/91 20.40 GARVENS GREETING SUPPLIES 20.40 035G68 01/24/91 305.92 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES 035G68 01/24/91 210.46 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. REPAIR PARTS 035G68 01/24/91 92.13 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. TELEPHONE 035G68 01/25/91 1,673.68 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. FIXTURES' 2,282.19 * * * * ** 035G72 01/25/91 45..00 GARY SMIEJA- REPAIR PARTS 035G72 .01/24/91 360.00 GARY SMIEJA REPAIR PARTS * * 405.00 * * ** 035G79 01/29/91 5,000.00 GREUPNER -JOE PRO SERVICES 5,000.00 * * * * ** 035G96 01/25/91 314.00 GUY SPEAKER CO. REPAIR PARTS 314.00 * * * * ** 035H03 01/24/91 1,984.20 HYDRO SUPPLY CO WATER METER 035H03 01/29/91 1,619.76 HYDRO SUPPLY CO WATER METERS 035H03 01/24/91 2,177.26 HYDRO SUPPLY CO WATER METER 035H03 01/24/91 2,015.80 HYDRO SUPPLY CO WATER METERS 02 -04 -91 PAGE 10 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 27- 4504- 667 -66 032534 2932 * ** -CKS 10- 4318 - 280 -28 1990 * ** -CKS 29- 4572 - 722 -72 41601 2546 29- 4648 - 722 -72 41601 2546 * ** -CKS 30- 4288 - 782 -78 910118 3927 * ** -CKS 50- 4632 - 862 -86 2215 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 560 -56 219130 2516 10- 4540- 322 -30 219982 2154 10- 4540 - 646 -64 218329 2481 40- 4540- 802 -80 220621 2801 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10- 4540 - 560 -56 * ** -CKS 27- 4201 - 661 -66 * ** -CKS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 6833 2487 40- 1220 - 000 -00 3291 2439 40- 1220 - 000 -00 3301 2439 40- 1220 - 000 -00 3281 5189 40- 1220 - 000 -00 3280 2439 * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 035H03 01/25/91 1,782.47 HYDRO SUPPLY CO WATER METERS 035H03 01/24/91 47.95 HYDRO SUPPLY CO GASKETS PARTS 02 -04 -91 PAGE 11 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 40- 1220- 000 -00 3293 2439 40- 4540 - 807 -80 3273 5189 * ** -CKS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 105577 2425 * ** -CKS 9,627.44 10- 4540 - 560 -56 2169 * * * * ** 10- 4620 - 560 -56 2577 245831 2759 * ** -CKS 035H09 01/25/91 255.95 HALLMAN GENERAL SUPPLIES * ** -CKS 255.95 25- 2010 - 000 -00 539631 1603 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 035H16 01/25/91 193.10 H &L MESABI 035H16 01/25/91 189.36 H &L MESABI * * * * ** 10- 2010 - 000 -00 382.46 035H33 01/28/91 367.90 HENN CTY SHERIFF 035H33 01/28/91 18.00 HENN CTY SHERIFF GENERAL SUPPLIES 23- 4504 - 612 -61 385.90 * * * * ** 27- 2010 - 000 -00 035H42 01/24/91 570.96 HERMAN MILLER INC. 570.96 * * * * ** 035H56 01/29/91 23.93 HIRSHFIELDS 23.93 * * * * ** 035H61 01/24/91 310.12 HOFFERS INC 310.12 035I59 01/28/91 39.75 INTERIOR COM SYS 39.75 * * * * ** 035I67 01/28/91 183.81 INTERNL TRUCKS INC 183.81 * * * * ** 035J27 01/29/91 11.61 JERRYS FOODS 035J27 01/29/91 28.27 JERRYS FOODS 035J27 01/29/91 130.76 JERRYS FOODS 170.64 * * * * ** 035J35 01/24/91 18.42 JERRYS PRINTING PARTS 02 -04 -91 PAGE 11 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 40- 1220- 000 -00 3293 2439 40- 4540 - 807 -80 3273 5189 * ** -CKS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 105577 2425 CULTURAL EXPO 10- 4280 - 504 -50 5491 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 2169 PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 2577 245831 2759 * ** -CKS WORKHOUSE /JAIL 10- 2010 - 000 -00 EQUIP MAINT 10- 2010 - 000 -00 GENERAL SUPPLIES * ** -CKS REMODELING 25- 2010 - 000 -00 539631 1603 CULTURAL EXPO 10- 4280 - 504 -50 5491 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS PAINT /LUMBER 30- 4544- 782 -78 245831 2759 a * ** -CKS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 =4504- 648 -64 172437 1864 * ** -CKS EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274 - 420 -42 030837 * ** -CKS REPAIR WORK 10- 2010 - 000 -00 63253 2278 * ** -CKS CLEANING SUPPLIES 10- 4512 - 440 -44 GENERAL SUPPLIES 23- 4504 - 612 -61 CONCESSIONS 27- 2010 - 000 -00 CULTURAL EXPO 10- 4280 - 504 -50 5491 * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 035J35 01/24/91 79.52 JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING 97.94 * * * * ** 035J74 01/24/91 35.85 JUSTUS LUMBER GENERAL SUPPLIES 035J74 01/24/91 282.38 JUSTUS LUMBER GENERAL SUPPLIES 035J74 01/24/91 52.69 JUSTUS LUMBER SHOP MATERIALS * * * * ** 370.92 035J99 01/29/91 40.00 JANET CANTON MILEAGE /LOGIS * * * * ** 40.00 035K35 01/25/91 101.64 KNOX COMM CREDIT BATTERIES 035K35 01/24/91 35.41- KNOX COMM CREDIT CREDIT 035K35 01/24/91 147.88 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 035K35 01/24/91 38.17 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER 035K35 01/24/91 28.91 KNOX COMM CREDIT REPAIR PARTS 035K35 01/24/91 23.73 KNOX COMM CREDIT REPAIR PARTS 035K35 01/24/91 22.29 KNOX COMM CREDIT REPAIR PARTS 035K35 01/29/91 68.85 KNOX COMM CREDIT LUMBER 035K35 01/25/91 77.45 KNOX COMM CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 473.51 * * * * * ** 035L01 01/25/91 615.00 LINDA KOZAK PAYMENT 615.00 * * * * * ** 035L28 01/24/91 206.67 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 035L28 01/24/91 457.45 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 035L28 01/24/91 445.85 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 035L28 01/24/91 368.20 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES * * * * ** 1,478.17 035L44 01/25/91 125.00 LEAANNS SEW /DECO REPAIRS 125.00 * * * * ** 035L46 01/25/91 91.43 LIEN INFECTION CON SERVICES 91.43 * * * * ** 035L52 01/29/91 297.30 LINJO ASSOC WATER TREATMENT 297.30 02 -04 -91 PAGE 12 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4504 - 621 -62 5492 10- 2010 - 000 -00 71464 2114 10- 2010 - 000 -00 71247 2000 40- 2010 - 000 -00 71958 2146 10- 4208 - 160 -16 10- 4504 - 325 -30 10- 4504 - 646 -64 10- 4504 - 646 -64 10- 4604 - 646 -64 27- 4540 - 667 -66 27- 4540 - 667 -66 27- 4540 - 667 -66 27- 4604 - 662 -66 28- 4504 - 702 -70 30- 4201 - 781 -78 720702 2586 720782 720812 2607 792564 2638 823264 2475 720817 2676 792492 2769 792937 2922 807971 2833 10- 2010 - 000 -00 2316 10- 2010 - 000 -00 2316 40- 2010 - 000 -00 2317 40- 2010 - 000 -00 2350 10- 4248 - 440 -44 91004 2732 27- 4288 - 667 -66 30- 4564 - 783 -78 3023 3003 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA MIDWEST MACHINERY CHECK REGISTER MIDWEST MACHINERY CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION * * * * ** 492.00 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC 01/25/91 436.17 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC 035L60 01/24/91 3,787.79 LOGIS DATA ENTRY 035L60 01/24/91 2,463.57 LOGIS DATA ENTRY 035L60 01/24/91 3,128.32 LOGIS DATA .ENTRY . 035L60 01/24/91 1,842.76 LOGIS DATA ENTRY 035L60 01/24/91 292.47 LOGIS DATA ENTRY 035L60 01/24/91 292.47' LOGIS DATA ENTRY 035L60 01/24/91 292.47 . LOGIS DATA ENTRY * * * * ** 27- 4504 - 662 -66 12,099.85 2557 01/25/91 74.75 035L70 01/29/91 125.00 LUCY ROSCHE CLEANING 035L70 01/29/91 90.00 LUCY ROSCHE CLEANING CLEANING SUPPLIES 28 -4512- 702 -70 215.00 2764 01/24/91 415.60 01/24/91 1,970.04 MIDWEST MACHINERY 01/25/91 .94.93 MIDWEST MACHINERY 26044 2,064.97 01/24/91 01/25/91 498.04 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC 01/25/91 492.00 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC 01/25/91 436.17 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC MERIT 1,426.21 GENERAL SUPPLIES 01/25/91 188.05 MCNEILUS STEEL 01/25/91 326.50 MCNEILUS STEEL 01/25/91 326.50 MCNEILUS STEEL 26068 841.05 * . 01/24/91 REPAIR WORK REPAIR PARTS FLANGE /CABLE BROOM FLANGE /CABLE 02 -04 -91 PAGE 13 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 10- 2010 - 000 -00 10- 2010 - 000 -00 40- 2010 - 000 -00 50- 2010 - 000 -.00 50- 2010 - 000 -00 50- 2010 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS 27- 4201 - 662 -66 30613 1465 27- 4201 - 662 -66 30615 1466 * * *- -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 S00140 2501 10- 4540- 560 -56 P02084 2486 10- 4534 - 310 -30 11257 2288 10- 4534 - 310 -30 11218 2483 10- 4540 - 560 -56 11258 2292 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS SWHEET 10- 4540 - 540 -54 105577 2426 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 106129 2489 PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 105757 2437 * ** -CKS 01/25/91 496.90. MERIT SUPPLY SIGN 10- 4322 - 280 -28 26044 2490 01/24/91 488.25 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 318 -30 25964 2484 01/25/91 189.00 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 560 -56 26016 2594 01/29/91 4,458.25 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 645 764 26068 2706 01/24/91 91.65 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 10- 4512- 520 -52 26069 2639 01/25/91 190.20 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 10- 4512 - 540 -54 25986 2513 01/25/91 327.25 MERIT SUPPLY PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 26046 2653 01/29/91 69.00 MERIT SUPPLY DOORMATES 27- 4504 - 662 -66 25984 2557 01/25/91 74.75 MERIT SUPPLY CARPET.CLEANER 27-4512-667-66,26009 2608 01/25/91 482.00 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 28 -4512- 702 -70 26081 2764 01/24/91 415.60 MERIT SUPPLY EQUIPMENT 30- 1340 - 782 -78 26048 2750 01/24/91 4,911.10- MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 26066 2772 01/24/91 4,911.10 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 26066 2772 01/25/91 489.37 MERIT SUPPLY: GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 26117 2844 01/24/91 4,911.14- MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 - 7826066 2772 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 035M27 01/24/91 035M27 01/24/91 035M27 01/24/91 035M27 01/24/91 035M27 01/29/91 035M27 01/24/91 035M27 01/25/91 035M27 01/25/91 * * * * k 035M29 01/2,8/91 * * k * k * 035M32 01/24/91. 035M32 01/24/91 035M32 01/29/91 035M32 01/29/91 035M32 01%24/91 MERIT SUPPLY 'SAFETY PAINT 035M35 01/25/91 * k * * * k 035M46 01/29/91 035M46 01/25/91 110.42 23.42 035M49 01/29/91 035M49 01/25/91 035M68 01/28/91 035M68 01/25/91 035M68 01/25/91 035M68 01/28/91 035M68 01/28/91 035M68 01/28/91 035M68 01/28/91. 035M68 01/28/91 035M68 01/28/91 035M68 01/28/91 035M68 01/28/91 035M68 01/28/91 02 -04 -91 PAGE. 14 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 30- 4504- 782 -78 30- 4504- 782 -78 30- 4504 - 782 -78 30- 4504 - 782 -78 30- 4512 - 782 -78 30- 4512- 782 -78 40- 4504 - 801 -80 40- 4504 - 801 -80 10- 2010 - 000 -00 26006 26066 26066 26066 26145 26067 26047 26008 50- 4632 - 822 -82 2776 50- 4632 - 842 -84 2774 50- 4632 - 842 -84 2934 50- 4632 - 862 -86 2907 50- 4632 - 862 -86 2772 40- 4312 - 812 -80 2772 2772 2772 2772 2921 2763 2651 2571 27- 4624 - 663 -66 2700 28- 4624 - 703 -70 2779 90.52 CHECK REGISTER FIRST AMOUNT VENDOR. ITEM DESCRIPTION .491.10- MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 491.10 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 4,911.14 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 491.10 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 477.15 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 471.70 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 119.80 MERIT SUPPLY PAINT 182.40 MERIT SUPPLY 'SAFETY PAINT 9,514.37 81.91 MN 110.42 MESSERLI & KRAMER AMBULANCE COLLECT 110.42 23.42 MN 392.74 M AMUNDSON CIGRETTES 408.68 M AMUNDSON. CIGARETTES 473.72 M AMUNDSON MIX 172.78 M AMUNDSON MISC BILL 140.58 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 1,588.50 * - EQUIP 226,698.00 METRO WASTE CONTROL SEWER SERVICE 226,698.00 PHONE RENTAL 5.51 METZ BAKING CO BREAD 22.00 METZ BAKING CO COST /GOODS 27.51 EQUIP 10- 4226- 420 -42 02 -04 -91 PAGE. 14 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 30- 4504- 782 -78 30- 4504- 782 -78 30- 4504 - 782 -78 30- 4504 - 782 -78 30- 4512 - 782 -78 30- 4512- 782 -78 40- 4504 - 801 -80 40- 4504 - 801 -80 10- 2010 - 000 -00 26006 26066 26066 26066 26145 26067 26047 26008 50- 4632 - 822 -82 2776 50- 4632 - 842 -84 2774 50- 4632 - 842 -84 2934 50- 4632 - 862 -86 2907 50- 4632 - 862 -86 2772 40- 4312 - 812 -80 2772 2772 2772 2772 2921 2763 2651 2571 27- 4624 - 663 -66 2700 28- 4624 - 703 -70 2779 90.52 MATRX MEDICAL INC FIRST AID SUPPLIES 10- 4510- 440 -44 164668 1810 17.61 MATRX MEDICAL INC AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 10- 4510- 440 -44 161043 1803 108.13 14.14 MN CELLULAR PHONE PHONE RENTAL 10- 2010- 000 -00 2538 65.56 MN CELLULAR PHONE CAR PHONE 10- 4204 - 100 -10 81.91 MN CELLULAR PHONEi CAR PHONE 10 -4204- 140 -14 807727 23.42 MN CELLULAR PHONE RENTAL EQUIP 10- 4226 - 420 -42 6.84 MN CELLULAR PHONE RENTAL EQUIP 10- 4226 - 420 -42 7.44 MN CELLULAR PHONE RENTAL EQUIP 10- 4226 - 420 -42 17.23 MN CELLULAR PHONE RENTAL EQUIP 10- 4226 - 420 -42 166.43 MN CELLULAR PHONE RENTAL EQUIP 10- 4226- 420 -42 17.48 MN CELLULAR PHONE RENTAL EQUIP 10- 4226 - 420 -42 48.69 MN CELLULAR PHONE RENTAL EQUIP 10- 4226 - 420 -42 57.07 MN CELLULAR. PHONE RENTAL EQUIP 10- 4226 - 420 -42 76.94 MN CELLULAR PHONE RENTAL EQUIP 10- 4226 - 420 -42 * ** -CKS c * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 583.15 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 01/25/91 44.75 MN. CONWAY EXTING SERVICE 01/24/91 54.50 MN. CONWAY SAFETY EQUIPMENT 99.25 01/24/91 24.80 MN SUBURBAN NEWS AD FOR BIDS 01/29/91 54.72 MN SUBURBAN NEWS AD FOR BID 01/29/91 58.50.1 MN SUBURBAN NEWS AD /LIFT STATION 01%29/91, 26.66 MN SUBURBAN NEWS AD FOR BID ' 01/24/91 20.12 MN SUBURBAN NEWS NOTICE /PUBLIC HRG 01/24/91 116.00 MN SUBURBAN NEWS WANT ADS 300.80 01/25/91 178.92 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 178.92 01/29/91 146.25 MONARCH MARKETING OFFICE SUPPLIES 01/29/91 146.25 MONARCH MARKETING PREV MAINT 292.50 01/28/91 65.00 MOTOROLA INC RADIO REPAIR 65.00 01/24/91 4,004.40 MPLS FINANCE DEPT. WATER PURCHASED 4,004.40 01/24/91 1,170.00 MPLS SEWER &WATER REPAIRS 1,170.00 01/24/91 319.92 MUNICILITE CO. SPOTLIGHT 319.92 " 01/24/91 32.39 NAPA AUTO PARTS GAUGE 01/24/91. 37.81 NAPA AUTO PARTS SWITCH 70.20 01/29/91 233.63 NATL GUARDIAN SYS. ALARM SERVICE 233.63 02 -04 -91 PAGE 15 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE j * ** -CKS 10- 4274- 440 -44 156616 2526 10- 4642- 420 -42 156617 10- 4210 - 140 -14 10- 4210 - 140 -14 10- 4210 - 140 -14 10- 4210 - 140 -14 10- 4210 - 140 -14 10- 4212 - 510 -51 89783 25739 25739 25739 89784 `III 16Y t i II-I T 29-IM [* R I Y �'4 L -* 1 50- 4516 - 820 -82 706726 50- 4516 - 860 -86 706725 10- 2010 - 000 -00 5050 40- 2010 - 000 -00 40- 4248 - 803 -80 030268 2637 10- 4620- 560 -56 2681 2512 10- 4540 - 560 -56 627221 2562 10- 4540 - 560 -56 627093 2508 50- 4304 - 841 -84 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS: * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 035N31 01/25/91 391.15 NEBCO DISTRIBUTING COST /GOODS SOLD 035N31 01/25/91 58.80 NEBCO DISTRIBUTING COST OG GOODS xxxxxx 449.95 035N36 01/29/91 19.96 NORTHERN GENERAL SUPPLIES 035N36 01/28/91 39.92 NORTHERN REPAIR PARTS 59.88 xxxxxx 035N48 01/25/91 41.72 NO STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS 41.72 xxxxxx 035N56 01/24/91 194.60 NORTHERN POWER PROD. PARTS xxxxxx 194.60 * 035N82 01/29/91 171.72 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST /GOODS SOLD 171.72 * xxxxxx 035017 01/29/91 176.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS INSTALL DRIVE 035017 01/29/91 3,000.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS SERVICE CONTRACT 035017 01/29/91 120.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS MOUSE 035017 01/24/91 280.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS SERVICE CONTRACT 3,576.00 * xxxxxx 035024 01/24/91 195.00 OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING 035024 01/24/91 433.80 OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING xxxxxx 628.80 * 035036 01/24/91 46.34 OLSON CHAIN & CABLE REPAIR PARTS 035036 01/24/91 9.30 OLSON CHAIN & CABLE REPAIR PARTS 55.64 xxxxxx 035038 01/24/91 177.00 OLSON FIRE PRO. REPAIRS xxxxxx 177.00 ' 035P08 01/29/91 3,405.60 PERKINS LSCAPE CONST CONSTRUCTION 3,405.60 * 02 -04 -91 PAGE 16 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 28- 4624 - 703 -70 032922 2679 28- 4624 - 703 -70 032923 2917 * ** -CKS 27- 2010 - 000 -00 422959 2257 27- 2010 - 000 -00 422115 2253 * ** -CKS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 290730 2830 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 248780 2286 * ** -CKS 23- 4624 - 613 -61 180583 2609 * ** -CKS 10- 4288 - 510 -51 130928 2374 10- 4288 - 510 -51 128956 2622 10- 4504 - 420 -42 131409 30- 4288 - 781 -78 130867 2849 * ** -CKS 10- 4600 - 420 -42 31372 2455 10- 4600 - 420 -42 31371 2454 * ** -CKS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 106711 2687 30- 4540 - 782 -78 106649 2628 * ** -CKS 27- 4248 - 667 -66 9819 2901 * ** -CKS 27- 4306 - 664 -66 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10- 4504 - 500 -50 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 035P11 01/29/91 50.00 PARK NIC MED CTR PHYSICAL 035P11 01/29/91 286.50 PARK NIC MED CTR PHYSICAL 035P11 01/29/91 830.00 PARK NIC MED CTR PHYSICAL 34955 2511 1,166.50 035P35 01/24/91 13.66 PETERSON- BARBARA PRO SERVICES 035P35 01/24/91 12.79 PETERSON- BARBARA GENERAL SUPPLIES 035P35 01/24/91 22.12 PETERSON- BARBARA OFFICE SUPPLIES k k k* k k 48.57 10- 4504- 301 -30 1331 .035P48 01/24/91 149.50 PIP PRINTING PRINTING 035P48 01/24/91 :7.00 PIP PRINTING PRINITNG 156.50 * k k * k * f 035P54 01/25/91 .372.50 PLANT &FLANGED EQU REPAIR APRTS 372.50 035P64 01/29/91 15.43. POMMER CO PLAQUE 15.43 035P84 01/29/91 56.76 PRO INSTANT PRINT CULTURAL EXPO 56.76 035Q20 01/25/91 61.32 QUICK SERV BATTERY FILTER 035Q20 01/25/91 27.45 QUICK SERV BATTERY FILTER - 88.77 035R01 01/25/91 93.95 R &R SPECIALTIES INC GENERAL'SUPPLIES 93.95 035R21 01/24/91 177.55 RED WING SHOES SHOES 035R21 01%24/91 225.20 RED WING SHOES SHOES 402.75 035R22 01/25/91 68.00 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 0.35R22 01/25/91 259:90 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 02 -04 -91 PAGE 17 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 10- 2010 - 000 -00 10- 2010 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS 30- 4201 - 781 -78 30- 4504- 782 -78 30- 4516 - 781'' =78 * ** -CKS 30- 4600- 781 -78 8567 30- 4600- 781 -78 * ** -CKS 40- 4540 - 807 -80 10750 2646 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 500 -50 024539 * ** -CKS 10- 4280 - 504 -50 40682 2989 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 34946 2507 10- 4540 - 560 -56 34955 2511 * ** -CKS 28- 4504- 704 -70 14181 2916 * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 10- 2010 - 000 -00 10- 4504- 301 -30 1331 2589 10- 4504 - 646 -64 1330 2590 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 035R22 01/28/91 462.00 035R22 01/29/91 648.00 035R22 01/28/91 125.00 035R22 01/24/91 349.90 035R22 01/24/91 457.02 035R22 01/24/91 73.31 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,443.13 * k k k* k k TOOLS 035R25 01/24/91 95.60 035R25 01/24/91 320.90 k k k k k 416.50 * 035R49 01/25/91 60.00 035R49 01/29/91 86.81 035R49 01/25/91 85.00 231.81 * k * k k * k 035R53 01/25/91 45.30 45.30 * k k R * * k 035R98 01/25/91 96.00 96.00 * k k* k k k 035S03 01/25/91 47.55 47.55 * kk * * *k 035S10 01/24/91 413.28 035S10 01/24/91 387.68 800.96 * k k k k* k 035S27 01/29/91 90.08 035S27 01/25/91 46.89 136.97 * k k k* k k 035S54 01/24/91 140.40 140.40 * * k * * k k 035S63 01/25/91 180.50 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REM SUPPLIES TOOLS RENTAL EQUIP & SALES SAW PARTS RENTAL EQUIP & SALES CHAIN SAW ROAD RESCUE ROAD RESCUE ROAD RESCUE ROBERT B. HILL ROXANNE SEIDEL S. T. ROBB 02 -04 -91 PAGE 18 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 30- 2010 - 000 -00 30- 4504 - 782 -78 30- 4504 - 782 -78 30- 4504 - 782 -78 30- 4504 - 783 -78 30- 4580 - 782 -78 1273 01373 1295 1341 01317 01333 2928 2929 2927 2823 2777 2778 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 644 -64 1859 2505 10- 4580 - 644 -64 1858 2502 * ** -CKS BATTERY STICKS 10- 4504 - 440 -44 1126 2532 WARNING LITES 10- 4504- 440 -44 2195 2730 AMBER LIGHT 10- 4504 - 440 -44 1316 2730 SALT PRO SERVICES FASTENERS SUBURBAN TIRE & AUTO TIRES SUBURBAN TIRE & AUTO TIRES SHERWIN WILLIAMS SHERWIN WILLIAMS STAR TRIBUNE STATES ELECTRIC MFG PAINT PAINT DUES /SUBSCRIPTNS REPAIR PARTS * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 440 -44 27075 2528 * ** -CKS 30- 4201 - 781 -78 * ** -CKS 40- 4540 - 802 -80 55040 2506 * ** -CKS 10- 4616 - 560 -56 15228 2499 10- 4616 - 560 -56 15261 2561 * ** -CKS 27- 4544 - 662 -66 12621 3001 40- 4540 - 802 -80 215 -0 2409 * ** -CKS 30- 4204 - 782 -78 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 322 -30 425 1716 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE * * * * ** 035S72 035S72 035S72 035S72 035S72 035S72 * * * * ** 035S77 035S77 035S77 035S77 035S77 035S78 035S78 035S78 035S78 035578 035S78 035S78 035S78 * * * * ** 035S92 035S92 035T02 035T02 035T02 035T13 035T13 * * * * ** 035T40 * * * * ** AMOUNT 180.50 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 01/28/91 52.75 - STREICHERS 01/28/91 212.00 STREICHERS 01/28/91 423.00 STREICHERS 01/28/91 19.90 STREICHERS 01/28/91 242.50 STREICHERS 01/28/91 301.55 STREICHERS TAMARACK 1,251.70 01/25/91 01/25/91 100.00 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 01/25/91 64.28 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 01/25/91 60.51 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET. 01/25/91 11.55 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET. 01/25/91 8.62- SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 227.72 01/24/91 64.22 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP 01/25/91 313.61 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP 01/24/91 52.63 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP 01/24/91 52.61 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP 01/24/91 22.34 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP 01/24/91. 52.63- SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP 01/25/91 90.40 SUBURBAN PLUMB. SUP 01/24/91 381.78 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP 924.98 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE AMMUNITION AMMUNITION AMMUNITION REPAIR WORK REPAIR WORK REPAIR WORK VALVE CREDIT PLUMBING PARTS STEEL.FITTINGS PIPE 'SUPPLY PIPE SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES PIPE SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS TOOLS 01/29/91 267.65 SYSTEM SUPPLY DISKETTES 01/29/91 8.80 SYSTEM SUPPLY DISKETTES 10- 4540 - 560 -56 276.45 10 -4540- 646 -64 2656 01/24/91 32.73 TAMARACK GENERAL SUPPLIES 01/24/91 23.30 TAMARACK GENERAL SUPPLIES 01/25/91 17.45 TAMARACK LUMBER 40- 4580- 803 -80 73.48 01/24/91 499.20 TOM HORWATH 01/24/91 858.00 TOM HORWATH 1,357.20 01/24/91 10.00 10.00 TOLL COMPANY FORESTRY TRIMMING /INSPECTNS PROPANE 02 -04 -91 PAGE 19 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 4226 - 420 -42 10- 4266 - 420 -42 10- 4266 - 420 -42 154831 9105 10- 4572 - 420 -42 10- 4572 - 420 -42 10- 4572- 420 -42 10- 4248 - 560 -56 114876 10- 4248 - 560 -56 113841 10- 4248 - 560 -56 115369 10- 4540 - 560 -56 139068 10- 4540 - 560 -56 139188 10 -4540- 646 -64 2656 10- 4620 - 560 -56 2416 40- 2010 - 000 -00 2360 40- 4504 - 801 -80 2360 40- 4504- 801 -80 2421 40- 4504 - 801 -80 2360 40- 4540- 801 -80 2657 40- 4580- 803 -80 2566 10- 4504 - 510 -51 10550 2826 10 -4504- 510 -51 10615 2826 30- 4504 - 782 -78 135802 2775 30- 4504 - 782-78 135090 2775 30- 4544 - 782 -78 137436 2629 10- 4201 - 644 -64 10- 4201 - 980 -64 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 108465 2572 * ** -CKS r 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 035T42 01/25/91 035T42 01/25/91 * * * * ** 035T66 01/29/91 * * * * ** 035T84 01/25/91 * * * * ** 035T96 01/24/91 * * * * ** 035U08 01/28/91 035U08 01/28/91 035U08 01/28/91 035U08 01/24/91 * * * * ** 035V30 01/24/91 035V30 01/24/91 * * * * ** 035V80 01/24/91 035V80 01/24/91 035V80 01/24/91 035V80 01/25/91 035V80 01/25/91 * * * * ** 035W08 01/24/91 035W08 01/24/91 * * * * ** 035W11 01/28/91 035W11 01/28/91 035W11 01/28/91 035W11 01/28/91 AMOUNT 76.99 231.55 308.54 * 49.79 49.79 * 187.31 187.31 * 313.65 313.65 * 1,603.80 53.90 46.65 6.95 1,711.30 * 493.12 499.00 992.12 * 26.88 456.84 28.16 432.72 83.28 1,027.88 * 17.31 150.14 167.45 * 344.75 494.65- 494.64 467.16 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION TOOLS BY OLSEN GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS BY OLSEN GENERAL SUPPLIES TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT CRAFT SUPPLIES TWIN CITY ENGINE GASKETS TWIN CITY GAR. DOOR REPLACE SPRINGS UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM UNLIMITED VANTAGE ELECTRIC VANTAGE ELECTRIC VOSS ELECTRIC SUP VOSS ELECTRIC SUP VOSS ELECTRIC SUP VOSS ELECTRIC SUP VOSS ELECTRIC SUP W.W. GRAINGER W.W. GRAINGER W. GORDON SMITH W. GORDON SMITH W. GORDON SMITH W. GORDON SMITH UNIFORM ALLOWANCE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SERV PRO SERVICES REPAIR PARTS LAMPS REPAIR PARTS LAMPS LAMP FAN TIMER GASOLINE GASOLINE GASOLINE GASOLINE 02 -04 -91 PAGE 20 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4504- 646 -64 31801 2556 28- 4504 - 702 -70 31800 2712 23- 4588 - 611 -61 416075 2608 10- 4540- 560 -56 65944 2485 10- 4540 - 540 -54 15324 2573 10- 2010 - 000 -00 10- 2010 - 000 -00 10- 2010- 000 -00 30- 4504 - 781 -78 14612 2421 30- 4201 - 782 -78 11444 2470 30- 4201 - 782-78 11445 2472 10- 2010 - 000 -00 280075 2307 10- 2010- 000 -00 280176 2406 10- 4540 - 520 -52 280286 2433 27- 4504- 662 -62 280591 2578 50- 4504 - 864 -86 280608 2584 10- 4540 - 520 -52 2480 40- 4540 - 801 -80 2568 27- 2010 - 000 -00 122 1996 27- 2010- 000 -00 40687 1300 27- 2010- 000 -00 40687 1300 27- 2010- 000 -00 40735 1299 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 035W11 01/28/91 *kkkkk VENDOR 035W28 01/24/91 k * * * k k MESSAGE 035W35 01/29/91 k k k k k k 035W44 01/28/91 035W44 01/25/91 k k k k k k 035W49 01/28/91 035W49 01/24/91 k k k k k 035W66 01/24/91 035W89 - 01/24/91 k k * k 035X05 01/25/91 k k * k k k GENERAL SUPPLIES 065M27 01/25/91 kkkkkk CHECK REGISTER 02 -04 -91 PAGE 21 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 494.65 W. GORDON SMITH GASOLINE 27- 2010- 000 -00 40687 1300 1,306.55 * * ** -CKS 79.67 WATER PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 812 -80 191767 2560 79.67 * * ** -CKS 49.50 WEIGLE -SUE MILEAGE 10- 2010 - 000 -00 49.50 * ** -CKS 269.15 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. WELDING SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 88242 2343 333.10 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. ELECTRODE 10- 4610 - 560 -56 88217 2598 602.25 k. kkk -CKS 301.95 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT REPAIR WORK 10 -2010- 000 -00 26875 2358 300.00 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 26874 2357 601.95 * -: * ** -CKS 61:64 WILLIAMS STEEL PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 61.64 kkk -CKS 194.00 WORLD CLASS WINE BEER BILL 50- 4630 - 862 -86 3318 194.00 kkk -CKS 410.01 XEROX CORP 1991 BUDGET 10- 4504 - 510 -51 2271 410.01 - k k k - C K S 467.50 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANER 10- 4620 - 560 -56 26045 2654 467.50 - kkk -CKS 86,278.76 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 676.00 FUND 11 TOTAL C.D.B.G. 1,356.33 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER 4,280.96 FUND 25 TOTAL CAPITAL FUND 54.95 FUND 26 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUND 16,141.47 FUND 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND 1,713.71 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND - 515:61 FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND 14,657.09 FUND 30 TOTAL EDINBOROUGH PARK s 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 251,743.21 469.69 5,801.20 1,589.78 385,278.76 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR FUND 40 TOTAL FUND 41 TOTAL FUND 50 TOTAL FUND 60 TOTAL TOTAL ITEM DESCRIPTION UTILITY FUND STORM SEWER UTILITY LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND CONSTRUCTION FUND 02 -04 -91 PAGE 22 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE CFlEcK M187ER 0AT90 PAGES THROUGH -wTifANAGER A :A E InEC.TOR ATE