HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-02-04_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA
• EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
FEBRUARY 4, 1991
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL - HRA & COUNCIL
ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS - Adoption of Consent Agenda Items is made by the
Commissioners-as to the HRA items and by the - Council Members as to Council items.
All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are Consent Agenda Items
and are are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no
separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner or Council Member or citizen so
requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered
in "its normal sequence on the agenda.
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
* I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF BRA MEETING OF JANUARY 22, 1991
II. AWARD OF BID - CENTENNIAL LAKES MAINTENANCE FACILITY - MECHANICAL WORK
* III. PAYMENT'OF HRA CLAIMS
IV. ADJOURNMENT OF HRA
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
* I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of Regular Meetings of November 19 and December 3, 1990
II. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
A. Dr. Joyce Anderson, 7121 Glouchester Avenue.
III. AWARD OF BIDS
* A.
Improvement No. LS -11 - Lift Station Remodeling (Continue to 2/19/91)
* B.
(2) Fairway Mowers - Braemar Golf Course
* C.
1/2 Ton Cargo Van - Park Department
* D.
(2) Defibrillators
* E.
(6) Golf Cars
IV. REPORTS-AND RECOMMENDATIONS
A.
Temporary Conditional Use Permits
B.
Tax Forfeit.Land Proposal - Dewey Hill Eastland West Condominiums, Cahill
of Edina Townhomes
C.
Strong Beer/Wine License Discussion .
D.
Wildlife Committee Report
E.
1990 Census Population Counts
F.
Appointments to Advisory Boards /Commissions /Committees
G.
Appointment to The Edina Foundation Board
H.
Strategic Planning Meeting Date - 3/9/91
* I.
1991 Public Health Nursing Contract
* J.
Apartment Recycling Report
V. RESOLUTIONS Favorable rollcall vote by majority of quorum to pass.
* A. Assignment of Securities in Lieu of Bond
1. First Bank National Association - Edina Office
2. Marquette Bank Minneapolis- _
Agenda
Edina City Council
February 4, 1991
Page 2
VI. ,INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
VII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
VIII. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
A. Smoking policy
IX. FINANCE
* A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 02/04/91: Total $385,278.76
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Mon
Feb
18
PRESIDENTS DAY
- CITY HALL CLOSED
Tues
Feb
19
Regular Council
Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council
Room
Mon
Mar
4
Regular Council
Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council
Room
Tues
Mar
12
Annual Council /Advisory Boards Dinner Meeting
'6:00
p.m.
Braemar
Clubhouse
Mon
Mar
18
Regular Council
Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council
Room
Mon
Apr
1
Regular Council
Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council
Room
Mon
Apr
15
Regular Council
Meeting-
7:00
p.m.
Council
Room
Mon
Apr
22
Board of Review
5:00
p.m.
Council
Room
Tues
Apr
23
Annual Volunteers Reception
5:00
p.m.
Edinborough Park
MINUTES
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
JANUARY 22, 1991
Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Chairman
Richards.
MINUTES of the Joint /HRA Council Meeting of January 7, 1991, were approved as
submitted by motion of Commissioner Rice, seconded by Commissioner Smith.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus,.Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
PAYMENT OF HRA CLAIMS APPROVED Gordon Hughes, Executive Director explained
that the HRA claims payment system had been converted to the_LOGIS system,
which breaks HRA items out and will now be presented under the HRA portion of
the agenda. Mr. Hughes recommended authorizing payment of the claims.
Commissioner Smith made a motion for payment of HRA claims as shown in detail
on the check register dated 01/15/91 and consisting of one page: Total
$115,206.28. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Rice.,
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the HRA agenda, motion of Commissioner
Kelly was seconded by Commissioner Smith for adjournment. Motion carried
unanimously.
Executive Director
9ti1.tA.l
4 `J \�
°�' REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: HRA
FROM: GORDON L. HUGHES
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.00
DATE: FEBRUARY 4, 1991.
AGENDA ITEM HRA II.
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Company
Amount of Quote or E§d
1. GILBERT MECHANICAL
1.
27,700
2. .- DAYTON BLUFF
2.
29,970
3. PAVAN MECHANICAL
3.
30,600
4, BLAINE HEATING
4.
32,990
5. BOWLER MECHANICAL
5.
33,226
RECOMMENDED, QUOTE OR END:
GILBERT MECHANICAL
GENERAL INFORMATION:
" The proposed project covers all heating,
ventilation, and
other mechanical systems for the Centennial
Lakes maintenance/
storage area.
ADMINISTRATION
Signature V Department
The Recommended bid is
within budget not within get hn Wallin,
Kenneth Rosland, City Manat
Director
1991 CITY
OF EDINA HRA
CHECK NO.
DATE
035700
01/30/91
035701
01/30/91
035702
01/30/91
035702
01/30/91
035702
01/30/91
035703
01/30/91
035704
01/30/91
035705
01/.30/91
035706
01/30/91
035707
01/30/91
* * * * **
TAMARACK
02 -04 -91 PAGE
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
01- 3140 - 131 -12
01 -3140- 131 -12
01- 1390 - 132 -12
01- 1390 - 132 -12
01- 1390 - 132 -12
01- 1390 - 132 -12
01- 1340 - 132 -12
01- 4000 - 134 -12
01- 1319 - 131 -12
01- 1319 - 132 -12
APPROM fM PAYMOT, '
CHECK REGISTER - DATED , -
PAGES
THROUGH -
1
* * * -CKS
CHECK
REGISTER
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
4.00
NEIL JAHR
REFUND
4.00 *
4.00
JAMES M DUNN
REFUND
4.00 *
972.00
TAMARACK
PARK MAINT AREA
232.84
TAMARACK
PAINT /LUMBER
124.25
TAMARACK
PARK MAINT AREA
1,329.09 *
825.00
REM SUPPLY
PARK MAINT AREA
825.00 *
1,838.46
MERIT SUPPLY
EQUIP
1,838.46 *
100.00
THE URBAN LAND
DUES
100.00 *
14,949.53
WALKER PARKING
ENG FEES
14,949.53 *
1,145.93
BRW ARCH INC
ARCH FEE
1,145.93 *
20,196.01
FUND 01 TOTAL
FUND HRA
20,196.01
TOTAL
02 -04 -91 PAGE
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
01- 3140 - 131 -12
01 -3140- 131 -12
01- 1390 - 132 -12
01- 1390 - 132 -12
01- 1390 - 132 -12
01- 1390 - 132 -12
01- 1340 - 132 -12
01- 4000 - 134 -12
01- 1319 - 131 -12
01- 1319 - 132 -12
APPROM fM PAYMOT, '
CHECK REGISTER - DATED , -
PAGES
THROUGH -
1
* * * -CKS
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
NOVEMBER 19, 1990
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor
Richards.
EPILEPSY MONTH PROCLAIMED Mayor Richards read the following proclamation which
was adopted unanimously:
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, there are more than 100,000 Minnesotans with some form of epilepsy; and
WHEREAS, epilepsy is the second most common neurological disfunction or physical
impairment, not a disease but a disorder of the nervous system; and
WHEREAS,,sixty percent of those persons who have epilepsy are elementary school
children or younger which is approximately one child in every second classroom;
and
WHEREAS, early diagnosis and attention to the social and neurological aspects of
epilepsy will afford people better control; and
WHEREAS, there continues to be a need for improved education and more information
regarding public attitudes toward understanding and accepting those'persons with
epilepsy.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that I, Frederick S. Richards, Mayor of the City of
Edina, do hereby proclaim the month of November as
EPILEPSY MONTH IN THE CITY OF EDINA
and encourage the residents of our City to increase their awareness of the needs
of those who have epilepsy.
PROCLAIMED this 19th day of November, 1990.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by
Member Rice to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented,vith the
exception of removal of item IV.E - 50th and France Seasonal Banners.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A38 - TO PROVIDE FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS TO ALLOW CERTAIN
HOME OCCUPATIONS BY HANDICAPPED RESIDENTS ADOPTED ON SECOND READING Planner
Larsen recalled that the Council had granted First Reading to Ordinance No.
825 -A38 - To Provide for Conditional Use Permits to Allow Certain Home Occupations
by Handicapped Residents at its meeting of November 5, 1990 subject to certain
revisions. He presented and explained the following changes:'
1) The amendment has been revised to provide for City Council review after one
year, with notice, and thereafter every second year. The ordinance provides for a
review and not renewal. The Council would review to determine if conditions of
the permit are being observed. If they are not, the Council could order a
revocation of the permit. The word "renewal" has been eliminated because it
conflicts with language in the state statute.
2) Presently the amendment provides for permits by residents who are "physically
unable to be fully employed" outside the residence. Staff would suggest this
phrase be changed.to read "unable to be employed full time outside one's
residence." This phrase is more definite and more easily understood.
3) The sentence added at the end of the "Purpose" paragraph would clarify that
handicapped persons did not have to go through the conditional use permit process
if they otherwise complied with the customary home occupation conditions.
4) Paragraph 4(c), relating to conditions, and paragraph 5, relating to review of
permits, have been entirely rewritten. Paragraph 5 does not now provide for
expiration and renewal of the permit, but instead provides"that the Council shall
f
review each permit periodically to see'if the conditions under which the permit
was given are still being complied with. If they are not, then the Council may
direct the City Manager to proceed with revocation of the permit pursuant to
paragraph'H of Section 4. Paragraph H provides that notice is given to the
violators and they have a time stated in the notice to cure any violation. If it
is not cured, the matter is submitted to the City Council for hearing and the
Council may, at such hearing or continuation thereof, revoke the permit. This
paragraph has been set up using wording in the state statute regarding duration of
a permit.
5) Paragraph (b) (ii) under Section 4. Conditions and Findings provides for a
maximum number of automobile trips per week to the dwelling unit by individuals
other than the residents thereof generated by the home occupation.
Planner Larsen said staff and the City Attorney would recommend approval of Second
Reading and adoption of the ordinance amendment as now presented.
Public Comment
Michael Patera, 7120 Glouchester Avenue, stated that he agreed with the
recommendation to eliminate the term "fully employed ". He said he would like to
dispel two things: (i) it has been published and suggested that he is against the
proposed ordinance amendment which is untrue; (ii) that this ordinance amendment
deals with a neighborhood problem. The amendment would be applied city -wide and
it should be addressed 'as such. Mr. Patera said he assumed that this amendment is
for extra - ordinary relief from otherwise reasonable zoning requirements. What
this does is contrary to most present handicapped legislation. The focus has been
to integrate handicapped individuals into society as opposed to isolating them in
their homes. Also, because it is an exception to the zoning ordinance it of
necessity results in erosion to a certain degree. The threshold criteria "fully
employed" creates an erosion without a concomit and showing of need. The phrase
is an initial qualifier for any applicant, is definitional, and is the yardstick
against which any applicant will be measured. "Fully employed" is much broader
than the stated purpose. It does not distinguish between those presently
productive and gainfully employed and those who are not. According to the present
standard. "fully employed ", a person who is productive and gainfully employed
outside the home can move the business home because that person might not be fully
employed. He argued that the way the ordinance is presently drafted it would give
concessions to a class of persons without a proper showing of need. You can be
fully employed outside the home in some fashion and but then get a physician to
certify that you can be more fully employed at home.
Mayor Richards asked Mr. Pratera if he had precise language for 4.(c)(i) that he
would propose be considered rather than what is in the present draft. As
alternative language to "fully employed ", Mr. Pratera offered the wording "to
remain productive and gainfully employed ".
Harold Bagley, 7113 Glouchester Avenue, addressed the last comment of Mr. Pratera,
and said that would'create a problem because there is no standard. If someone
worked ten hours a week outside the home one could argue they are gainfully
employed. The wording "on a full time basis" as suggested by the Planner is more
easily understood. The reason the Planning Commission had suggested "fully
employed" was to allow a little more breath to the concept - to give the disabled
person the ability to make use of all their talents. Maybe they could work at a
job outside their home and create some income, but maybe they are talented at some
other job that they could only do in the home. Mr. Bagley said he also had
trouble with'the term describing the ordinance as extra - ordinary relief. The
ordinance lists the permitted occupations so this would not be opening up the
neighborhood to all kinds of occupations. He also said the procedure was
complicated for a disabled person to get a variance to go from ten automobile
trips per week to twenty. The ordinance could merely have been amended to simply
allow that and not have to get the conditional use permit. He argued that in some
home occupation cases it could well be that 40 trips a week is not unreasonable.
Mayor Richards reminded Mr. Bagley that the focus should be on the underlying
zoning as it relates to land use.
Member Smith then moved Second Reading of Ordinance No. 825A -38 as presented
except that the language-be amended to insert the phrase "unable to be employed
full time outside one's residence" instead of "to be fully employed ", and moved
adoption as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A38
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825)
TO PROVIDE FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS TO ALLOW
CERTAIN HOME OCCUPATIONS BY HANDICAPPED RESIDENTS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Paragraph D (Customary Home Occupations as an Accessory Use) of
Section 7 (General Requirements Applicable to All Districts Except as Otherwise
Stated) of Ordinance No. 825 is hereby amended by adding a new subparagraph as
follows:
"4. Permitted customary home occupations by residents who are
physically unable to be employed full time outside'their residence may be
allowed as a temporary conditional use, with variances from the conditions of
subparagraph l of this paragraph D. pursuant to the provisions of paragraph I
of Section 4 (Administration and Procedures) of this ordinance."
Sec. 2. Section 4 (Administration and Procedures) is hereby amended by
adding a new paragraph I as follows:
"I. Temporary Conditional Use Permits.
1. EMose. The purpose of temporary conditional use permits is
to allow handicapped residents of dwelling units to conduct and operate
permitted customary home occupations in their residence by means of such
variances.from the conditions otherwise imposed by this ordinance on such
occupation as the Council deems necessary and appropriate to allow such
persons to properly conduct and operate such occupation from their residence.
The Council hereby finds and determines that it is in the best interests of
the City and its citizens to provide a process and means by which handicapped
persons can carry on home occupations from their residence and thereby become
or remain productive and gainfully employed, and that'the granting of
conditional use permits pursuant to this paragraph I will promote the public
health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City, and its citizens.'
However, handicapped residents who do not need variances from conditions
imposed by this.ordinance on customary home occupations need not, and are not
required to, obtain a conditional use permit pursuant to this paragraph I.
2. Conditional Use Provisions Anly. All the provisions of paragraphs
D and H of this Section 4 relative to the issuance of conditional use permits
shall apply to temporary conditional use permits issued pursuant to this
paragraph I. except as specifically changed by this paragraph I.
3. Applications and Notice.
(a) An application for a temporary conditional use permit may be
initiated by the occupant of the residence from which the home occupation is
to be conducted, whether such occupant is an owner or a lessee of the
residence.
(b) The application for a temporary conditional use permit shall be
accompanied by the following additional information: I
.
(i) a letter (which shall be dated not earlier than 30 days prior
to the date of the application) from the applicant's attending physician
(who shall be duly licensed to practice medicine in Minnesota)
certifying that the applicant is physically unable to be employed full
time outside of the applicant's residence;
(ii) the.specific home occupation proposed by the applicant,
including the expected number of weekly automobile trips to the dwelling
unit by individuals other than the residents thereof expected to be
generated by the home occupation, the number of hours per day and the
number of days per week the home occupation will operate;
.(iii) any proposed interior or exterior alterations to the
dwelling unit necessary due to the proposed home occupation; and
(iv) any other information required, in the opinion of the
Planner, to evaluate the application, to determine consistency with the
Comprehensive Plan, and insure compliance with the requirements
contained in this ordinance and other applicable City ordinances.
(c) The erection of a sign shall not be required in connection with the
application for a temporary conditional use permit.
(d) Notice of hearing before the Council shall be published and mailed
as provided in subparagraph 5 of paragraph D of this Section 4 except that
mailed notice shall be given only to owners of property situated wholly or
partly within 350 feet of the property to which the application relates.
4. Conditions and Findings.
(a) 'In order to grant a temporary conditional use permit the Council
must make the same findings as set forth in subparagraph 5 of paragraph D of
this Section 4.
(b) In.order to grant a temporary conditional use permit, the Council
must also find that the proposed home occupation complies with the conditions
of subparagraph 1 of paragraph D of Section 7 of this ordinance, provided,
however, that:.
(i) the Council may grant a variance of any condition in
subparagraph 1 of paragraph D of said Section 7, if deemed necessary by the
Council to permit the applicant to properly operate and conduct the proposed
home occupation and if(the Council finds that such use will not negate or
violate any of the findings to be made pursuant to subparagraph 5 of
paragraph D of this Section 4;
(ii) the maximum number of automobile trips to the dwelling unit
of the applicant by individuals other than the residents thereof generated as
a result of.such home occupation may be increased by the.Council from ten per
week to a maximum of twenty per week -in connection with the granting of such
permit.
(c) Any permit granted pursuant to this.paragraph I shall remain in
effect, if not earlier terminated under other provisions of this - ordinance,
only so long as the following conditions are observed and complied with:
(i) that the applicant occupy the dwelling unit described in the
permit, and then only so long as such applicant is physically unable to be
employed full time outside of the applicant's residence;
(ii) that the findings made by the Council as set forth in
subparagraph 5 of paragraph D of this Section 4 continue without change or
violation; and
(iii) that the conditions of subparagraph l of paragraph D of
Section 7 of this ordinance, as varied by variances granted by the Council,
are not violated.
5. Duration and Review of Permits.
(a) Each permit issued pursuant to this paragraph I shall remain in
effect only so long as the conditions set out in subparagraph 4(c) of this
paragraph I are observed and not violated.
(b) The Council shall review each permit issued pursuant to this
paragraph I on the first anniversary of the effective date of the permit and
on each second anniversary (i.e., every other year) of such effective date
thereafter to determine if any of such conditions are not being observed or
are being violated. Such review shall be made at a public hearing, notice of
which shall be published and mailed in the same manner as notice would then
be given under this ordinance for a then new conditional use permit. All
persons may be heard, and the Council shall receive such evidence and
information as it deems necessary or desirable, orally and in writing, at
such hearing and continuations thereof. If, at such hearing, or a
continuation thereof, the Council concludes, by resolution, that one or more
of the conditions set out in subparagraph 4(c) of this paragraph I are not
being observed or are being violated, then the Council may direct the Manager
to institute proceedings to revoke the permit as provided in paragraph H of
this Section 4. The foregoing provisions shall not prevent the City from
esercising.any remedies for violations of any conditions applicable to any
conditional use permit whenever they occur.
6. All Districts. Customary home occupations conducted pursuant to
temporary conditional use permits issued under this paragraph I shall be allowed
as a conditional use in all districts in which dwelling units are allowed.
Sec. 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage
and publication.
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith; Richards
Ordinance adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 171 -A35 (ESTABLISHING FEE FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CERTAIN
HOME OCCUPATIONS BY HANDICAPPED RESIDENTS) ADOPTED• SECOND READING WAIVED Planner
Larsen presented Ordinance No. 171 -A35 and explained that it would provide for a
$75.00 application fee for Temporary Conditional Use Permits for handicapped
residents as provided in Ordinance No. 815 -A38 previously adopted. Staff would
recommend adoption with waiver of Second Reading.
Member Rice introduced Ordinance No. 171 -A35 and moved its adoption as follows,
with waiver of Second Reading:
ORDINANCE NO. 171 -A35
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 171
TO ADD FEE.FOR TEMPORARY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Schedule A to Ordinance No. 171 is hereby amended by adding the
following thereto:
ORD. SEC.
NO. NO. PURPOSE OF FEE /CHARGE AMOUNT FEE NO.
825 4(E)l Temporary Conditional Use Permit .$75.00 29f -a
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon
its passage and publication.
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Ordinance adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING ON PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR FARRELLS PARKWOOD KNOLLS (5700
BLAKE ROAD) CONTINUED TO 1213/90 Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved
and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen presented the request for preliminary
plat approval for Farrells Parkwood Knolls at 5700 Blake Road, generally located
just north of Vernon Avenue at the corner of Blake Road and South Knoll Drive.
Presentation by Planner
The subject property is a developed single family lot containing an area of 95,700
square feet, or 2.2 acres. The existing dwelling is located in the central
portion of the lot. The lot is adjacent to but is not part of the original
Parkwood Knolls development.
The Community Development and Planning Commission considered the proposed
subdivision at two meetings and has considered three different approaches to the
preliminary plat. At its meeting of August 29, 1990, the plat was originally
proposed as a three lot plat with new lot lines generally running in a east -west
direction. The staff report was written on the three lot proposal. However, at
the Planning Commission meeting the proponents presented a revised two lot plat
which eliminated the northerly lot. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to
approve the revised two lot preliminary plat.
Following that meeting the proponents chose not to proceed to the Council with the
approved two.lot plat. Instead they decided to return to the Planning Commission
meeting of September 26, 1990, with a revised three lot subdivison. The revised
three lot plat left the proposed new lot south of the.existing home essentially
the same as the earlier proposal. The northerly portion of the proposed plat was
now divided east /west as opposed to north /south as in the earlier three lot
preliminary plat. This change would allow for a larger front setback from South
Knoll Drive on Lot 2. The three existing homes that front on this block of South
Knoll have an average setback of 127 feet.
Planner Larsen presented graphics showing the proposed three lot plat and the 500
foot neighborhood, consisting of 45 lots, that was used for the size /area
comparison. The standards for the neighborhood are lot width of 130 feet, lot
depth.of 149 feet and lot area of 20,000 square feet. The proposed lots
dimensions are as follows:
Lot Width- Lot Depth Lot Area
Lot .1 126 240 •32,300
Lot 2 130 205 26,700
Lot 3 108 273 36,700
Lots l and 3 would require a lot width variance. All of the lots comply with or
exceed all other size requirements.
The property abuts an existing water body. The subdivision ordinance requires a
100 foot conservation easement upland from the ordinary high water mark. That
easement has been provided in the preliminary plat. The ordinance also requires
that plans be submitted illustrating areas of steep slopes as well as the location
of the proposed building pads. The proposed building pads and the setbacks for
the homes were pointed out on the graphics.
The Planning Commission voted by a 5 to 4 margin to recommend denial of the
revised three lot plat. -The lot width variances required for Lots 1 and 3 and the
possibility of a need for a front setback variance on Lot 2 were given as reasons.
The proponents have decided to proceed to the Council and ask for approval of the
revised three lot plat.
Presentation by Proponent
James Van Valkenburg, stated that he represented the proponents, Jim and Linda
Farrell, who own the subject property and that he wished to clarify some of the
concerns that were raised at the prior hearings. At the first hearing, the
proposal illustrated Lots 1 and 2 with a division line running east /west. Several
of the planning commissioners objected because one of the houses would.have to be
built on the setback alignment of the existing homes on South Knoll Drive. It was
suggested that the Farrells return with the current proposal with a north /south
division so that the home on Lot 2. would meet the setback of the other homes in
the area as required by the Zoning Ordinance. He pointed out that the Wurst home
immediately to the west is setback 125 feet, the next home to the west is 121
feet, and the setback for the proposed plat would be 135 feet.
Mr. Van Valkenburg said the current request is for approval of a three lot plat
with a north /south division. All of the proposed lots are substantially larger
than the 500 foot neighborhood median of 20,000 square feet. The lot width for
Lot 1 is shown at 126 feet and would require a 4 foot variance_. Frontage on Blake
Road for Lot 3 is shown at 108 feet in width and would also require a variance.
An earlier drawing met the 130 lot width requirement for Lot 3 but some of the
planning commissioners were concerned about the backyard of Lot 2. To address
that concern the lot line was moved to provide more backyard for Lot 2 and not
adversely affect Lot 3 because the Farrells intend to build a new home much
further to the west and south on Lot 3. The proposed plat illustrates a 100 -foot
conservation easement on Lot 3 which will be preserved as the Farrells do not
intend to have their new home encroach on that.
In conclusion; Mr. Van Valkenburg urged approval of the proposed plat. He
observed that they are trying to work with the Wursts immediately to the west. If
approved, they would attempt to work out some type of easement to protect the
existing trees, to have an setback alignment that would not adversely affect the
Wursts, and place some restrictions on Lot 2 to control mass and height of the
home to be built thereon.
Public Comment
Thomas Wurst, 6205 South Knoll Drive, stated that he and his wife own the
adjoining property immediately to the west of the Farrell property. He explained
that when they purchased their lot the house on the Farrell property was in
existence. They were informed that they would have to setback their residence to
conform to the existing house. The property immediately to their west also had to
conform to the same setback. These are the only three properties on south side of
South Knoll Drive between Blake Road and View Lane. He argued that the existing
setback alignment should be preserved.
Mr.,Wurst recalled that initially the Farrells asked them for their comments on a
three lot subdivision. After considering the proposed subdivision, they told the
Farrells they would object to three lots for aesthetic and other reasons but would
have no objection to the proposed Lot 3. At the first Planning Commission hearing
the two lot subdivision was approved. Subsequently, the proponents came back and.
asked for approval of a three lot subdivision. Mr. Wurst said they still have the
same objections.
As to the median size lots in the 500 foot neighborhood to the subject property,
Mr. Wurst submitted that the neighborhood contains two separate platted areas.
The area on the east side of Blake Road was developed with much smaller lots. The
lots in Parkwood Knolls were platted,at a later period with larger lots.
Mr. Wurst said he was deeply concerned about the proposed plat, i.e. location of
the building pad on Lot 2, location of the driveways, the topography, and the
conservation easement for the pond. He concluded by-stating that he would like to
see the property maintain the setbacks and aesthetics that are there now.
Council Comment
Member Rice questioned the feasibility of a driveway for Lot 1 coming off of South
Knoll Drive. As to Lot 2, he said he would be concerned that a house on that lot
could dominate the neighborhood because of the topography.
Member Kelly asked if protective covenants that might be placed on the property
A
would run with the land. Attorney Erickson opined that they could and thereby
protect the adjacent properties..
Mayor Richards commented that he would have a difficult time in supporting the
concept of a three -lot subdivision. However, there are some unique
characteristics to this property that would justify doing that if other concerns
are answered. He said he felt the neighborhood is oriented to the west and that
Blake Road is a division between the lots to the east and could be persuasive for
a two -lot development. Lot width variances of four feet for Lot land twenty -two
feet for Lot 2 would not preclude granting a three -lot subdivision. He suggested
this be approached as a planned unit development so that all affected parties
would know exactly what would occur. Mayor Richards said he would support a
three -lot subdivision provided that there was concurrence as to location of curb
cuts, driveways, footprint of buildings, height and mass of buildings, setbacks,
vegetation plan for all three lots. The Council Members said they would concur
with that concept if those issues would be addressed.
Planner Larsen pointed out that the proposed plat has been under consideration for
some time and it is approaching the 120 days deadline for action by the Council.
Mr. Van Valkenburg, representing the proponents, stated that they would waive the
120 day requirement. Attorney Erickson said such waiver should be in writing and
clarified that the Council would have to take action at the December 3, 1990.,
Council meeting if the requirement was not waived.
Member Smith made a motion to continue the hearing on preliminary plat approval
for Farrells Parkwood Knolls to December 3, 1990, with a specific proposal for a
three -lot subdivision that would address the following issues for all three lots:
1) curb cuts, 2) driveway locations, 3) vegetation plan, 4) building pads, 5)
setbacks, 6) massing for Lot 2, and 7) conservation easement for Lot 3.
Motion was seconded by Member Rice.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*BID AWARDED FOR COLLECTION OF GARBAGE/R.EFQSE FROM CITY PROPERTIES Motion
was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for
collection of garbage /refuse from City properties to recommended low bidder,
Aagard Environmental Services, at $5.89 per cubic yard.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR SKID STEER LOADER WITH ATTACHMENTS Motion was made by Member
Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for a skid steer loader
with attachments to recommended low bidder, Case Power & Equipment, at $26,765.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR FUEL MONITORING SYSTEM Motion was made by Member Smith and was
seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for a fuel monitoring system to
recommended low bidder, Westside Equipment, at $10,362.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR DRIVING RANGE TRACTOR FOR BRAEREAR GOLF COURSE Motion was made by
Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for a driving range
tractor for Braemar Golf Course to recommended low bidder, North Star Turf; at
$6,015.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
BID AWARDED FOR 50TH AND FRANCE SEASONAL BANNERS In response to questions raised
by the Council, Assistant Manger Hughes explained that the bid is for nylon
banners to be placed within the new street light and pedestrian light standards at
50th & France. The bids were for banners which have been specifically designed,
are warranted for five years, but are expected to last longer. They would be up
for approximately two months and their purpose would be to add color during the
winter season. The colors were selected by working with a committee of merchants
from the 50th &'France commercial area.
Christian Johnson, 50th & France Steering Committee, commented that this was the
design recommended by the committee'to best fit the season and that they felt the
banners were imperative to the whole renovation project. Member Rice asked if the
committee is considering banners for other seasons of the year. Assistant Manager
Hughes said if these work out well they may consider additional banners.
Manager Rosland explained that these were a part of the total budget for the
renovation project at 50th & France. By bidding items such as these separately
instead of under a general contract there is a cost savings of 10 -20 %.
Motion was made by Member Rice and was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid
for 50th & France seasonal banners to recommended low bidder, Banner Creations, at
$5,275.00.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINQTES'OF 11/13/90 APPROVED: NO ACTION TAKEN ON REOUEST
TO CHANGE HOURS OF LIMITED PARKING IN 50TH & FRANCE RAMPS Chief Craig Swanson
explained.that the Traffic Safety Committee had received a request from the 50th
and France Business and Professional Association to change "Hours of Limited
Parking" signage in the municipal ramps on West 49 1/2 Street and 51st Street.
The request was to enforce only the one hour parking areas of the ramps from
Thanksgiving through Christmas, but allow parking for unlimited periods in all
other signed areas.
The Committee's stance was that this would not be consistent with current policies
and that any change would have to be made by the Council. The action taken by the
Committee was to pass the item on to the City Council for review and possible
change by resolution.
Christine Johnson spoke on behalf of the 50th & France Board of Directors.
At their last meeting they voted to request that the three hour parking,
restriction be temporarily suspended. With the variety of shops and services at
50th and France, three hour parking-is not adequate for customers. Ms. Johnson
explained that they are reviewing several issues regarding the ramps, i.e.
employee parking, customer concerns, etc. This is viewed as a. temporary solution
through the holidays until a final plan can be offered to the Council after the
first of the year.
In response to.question of Member Paulus, Lota Werth, Executive Director of 50th &
France Association, said that there are two ways to let people know that there is
longer term parking in the ramps: 1) generic advertising for the Association, and
2) additional signage. She said they are up against big odds with unrestricted
parking at Southdale, the Galleria and strip malls in the area. They want to
remain competitive and also want to make it as attractive as possible for
customers to come to the area. They realize that there are parking situation
problems because there will probably never be sufficient parking for customers or
employees. The Board is attempting to put together a comprehensive parking plan
for the next year, including private security to monitor the employee situation.
Mayor Richards asked if the Board of Directors had discussed the possible loss of
customers because people could park for extended periods of time which could
reduce the number of parking spaces available. Ms. Werth said they had considered
that aspect.
Perry Anderson, merchant, said he was opposed to the temporary non - enforcement of
the three hour parking in the 50th & France'ramps. It would encourage other types
of long term parking to the detriment of business invitees and merchants who are
assessed in the costs of the ramps. It would also eliminate all control of
employee parking. Hosmer Brown, property owner at 50th & France, said this was
the most difficult issue they have faced and there is not a friendly consensus on
the issue. He said he shared many of the concerns of the merchants.and business
people at the corner but was not convinced that this would work or be helpful.
However, he pointed out that it was recommendation of the Board of Directors and
was one attempt to try to find a solution to the parking problem.
Following lengthy discussion, Member Rice made a motion to acknowledge receipt of
the recommendation of,the 50th and France Business and Professional Association to
change the hours of limited parking signage in the municipal ramps of 50th and
France and to take no action thereon at this time.
Motion was seconded.by Member Smith.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
Member Kelly then moved approval of the following recommended action listed in
Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of November 13, 1990:
1) To relocate the "SIGNAL YOUR TURN" sign west of the driveway to Point of
France, to have the Engineering Department review the site for possible ways to
cut a turn lane for westbound traffic into the complex and /or appropriate signing
and pass on to City Council, and to recommend to the City Council to pass a
resolution to Hennepin County to review the pedestrian safety issues at West 66th
Street and France Avenue,
and to acknowledge Sections B and C of the Minutes.
Motion was seconded by Member Rice.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
POLICY ADDRESSING ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION BY COACHES /CHAPERONS WHILE TRAVELING WITH
CITY SPONSORED YOUTH ATHLETIC EVENTS REFERRED BACK TO COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES
ADVISORY COMMITTEE Mayor Richards referred to a resolution adopted by the Edina
Community Health Services Advisory Committee at. its November 8, 1990, meeting
supporting the Edina School District's Strategic Plan. In addition, the Committee
recommended that the City of Edina adopt a policy prohibiting the consumption of
alcohol by coaches and chaperons while traveling with City sponsored youth
athletic teams. The Committee believes that sanctions for failing to comply with
this policy should include seasonal, annual or total suspension for the violators.
Member Paulus said this is a part of the School District's plan concerning the
issue of alcohol use by students in athletic programs. The issue of enforcement
would need to be cleared up and some good coaches may be lost. Member Kelly asked
if this could merely be a policy statement that we do not approve of alcohol
consumption by coaches and chaperons.
After considerable discussion, Member Smith made a motion to refer the matter back
to the Community Health Services Advisory Committee with the directive that the
Committee work with-the Edina Park Board to discuss the recommendation and the
concerns raised by the Council with the athletic associations and then report back
to the Council. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
PROPOSAL BY METRO RELATIONS. INC. TO MONITOR THE MWCC DISCUSSED Manager Rosland
advised that he had received a proposal from Eugene E. Franchett, owner of Metro
Relations, Inc., who has extensive background experience in government affairs, to
provide ongoing Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) oversight, analysis
and advocacy service for cities. Fees would vary depending on a city's use of the
wastewater system and for the City of Edina would be approximately $5700 per year.
The rates charged by MWCC have continued to rise and it has been very frustrating
to attempt to get answers from the MWCC. He said that something should probably
be done to monitor the activities and expenditures of MWCC. The question is who
should do this. Manager Rosland said he would like to talk with the Suburban Rate
Authority before he would recommend the proposal from Metro Relations, Inc. No
action was taken.
EDINA CHAMBER OF CO1rMCE PROPOSAL TO AUTHORIZE SALE OF STRONG BEER DISCUSSED•
PUBLIC FORUM TO BE HELD Marsh Everson, President of the Edina Chamber of
Commerce, referred to his letter of November 8, 1990, addressed to the Mayor and
Council Members. The letter advised that the Minnesota Legislature, in its 1990
session, passed legislation enabling municipalities to, by ordinance, authorize
the holder of an on -sale wine license to sell 3.2 beer, and whose total sales are
at least 60 percent attributable to the sale of food, to sell strong beer at
on -sale without an additional license (340a.404, Subd.S(b)).
After consideration and discussion, the Board of Directors of the Edina Chamber of
Commerce has concluded that the passage of an ordinance by the City, of Edina
authorizing the sale of strong beer in a manner consistent with the existing
ordinances regulating the sale of on -sale wine would be beneficial to the business
environment of the City, which in turn, would serve the general best interests of
the City as a whole..
After reaching this conclusion, the Board of Directors passed a resolution
supporting the addition of strong beer to the wine licensing ordinance as provided
by Minnesota law, and hereby requests that the City Council consider and pass an
enabling ordinance to that effect.
Virginia Bodine, Executive Director, Edina Chamber of Commerce, commented that
there have been no problems with the on -sale wine ordinance. Their primary
concern was the businesses in Edina and they would like to support them. Adding
strong beer to the on -sale wine ordinance would be helpful to the businesses.
Warren Beck, Gabbert and Beck and Board Member, said that the issue is not the
percentage of alcohol but the brands available to restaurants. Most premium or
imported beers are not 3.2 beer and restaurants which are trying to provide an
extensive array of beverages to their customers, based on customers' desires, find
themselves limited by not having strong beer available. By considering this kind
of action and taking the steps to allow the sale of strong beer, the primary
benefit would be the attraction of restaurants for which sale of imported beers is
considered as important to business development as the sale of wines.
Attorney Erickson clarified that this would require an amendment to the on -sale
wine licensing ordinance. He explained that the statute does not define
"intoxicating malt liquor ". There is a definition of "intoxicating liquor" which
includes malt beverage which has by weight more than 3.2% alcohol: So in essence,
it is an intoxicating liquor and they are defining it more closely by calling it
"intoxicating malt liquor" which presumably means beer at more than 3.2% alcohol.
In order to sell strong beer as provided by the statute, there are three
requirements: 1) you must hold an on -sale wine license, 2) you must hold a 3.2
beer on -sale license, and 3) 60% or more of gross receipts must be attributable to
the sale of food. Then the Council may if it wishes, by ordinance, allow the sale
of strong beer without an additional license.
The issue was raised by the Council as to whether this could be interpreted to
permit the sale of intoxicating liquor. Attorney Erickson said that could be
solved by the use of language in the ordinance that would clearly define strong
beer. Also discussed was whether there should be an advisory referendum or public
hearing on the matter.
Member Kelly made a motion that staff work with the Chamber of Commerce Board to
bring back a specific.proposal to hold a public forum after the first of the year
to solicit comments on the issue of an ordinance amendment that would allow the
sale of strong beer by holders of an on -sale wine license who also hold a 3.2 beer
license if 60% or more of gross receipts are attributable to the sale of food.
Motion was seconded by Member Paulus.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus,. Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED RELATING TO TAX FORFEITED LAND: PARCEL TO BE ACOUIRED FOR
PUBLIC PURPOSES Planner Craig Larsen informed the Council that staff had
discussed the three parcels on the Hennepin County List 760 -NC of tax forfeited
land. Per state statute the City can request any of the following: 1) Approve ,the
parcel(s) for public auction, or 2) Approve the parcels) for sale to adjacent
property owners, of 3) Request conveyance to the.City for public use without
monetary consideration. Staff would recommend the following:
Parcel A (PINS 08- 116 -21 -42 -0216) Located adjacent to the City's existing ponding
and open space in the Dewey Hill Estates plat. Public ownership of the parcel for
open space is desirable.
Parcel B (PINS 29- 117 -21 -43 -0047) A small 30 by 20 foot portion of a private
alley serving homes on Doncaster Way and Lochloy Drive. There appears to be no
public purpose for acquisition of this parcel. Sale of parcel to abutting
property owners is recommended.
Parcel C (PINS 20- 028 -24 -34 -0002) Narrow strip of land (11 1/2 feet) between 3205
and 3219 West.60th Street. There is no history on why this parcel was created.
There are no public utilities or public uses of the property. Sale of parcel to
abutting property owners is recommended.
Member Rice introduced the following resolutions and moved adoption:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that the City Attorney
be authorized and directed to file "Application by Governmental Subdivision For
Conveyance of Tag Forfeited Lands ", for the following described property contained
in Hennepin County Auditor's List "760 -NC ", said property to be used by the City
as hereafter set forth:
PIN 08- 116 -21 -42 -0216 - Open space.
ADOPTED this 19th day of November, 1990.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has received "from the County of
Hennepin a list of lands in said municipality which became the property of the
State of.Minnesota for non - payment of property taxes, which said list was received
on 11/07/90, Non - Conservation List 760 -NC; and
WHEREAS, the parcels in said list identified as PIN Nos. 29- 117 -21 -43 -0047 and
20- 028 -24 -34 -0002 have heretofore been classified by the Board of County
Commissioners of Hennepin County, Minnesota as non - conservation land and the sale
thereof has`heretofore been authorized by said Board of County Commissioners;
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the Edina City Council that there are no
existing or pending special assessments on said parcels;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the said
classification is hereby approved;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,by the Edina)City Council that, acting pursuant to
Minnesota Statute 282.01, it has determined that said parcels of land are not
buildable according to the City's Zoning Ordinance because of minimum area and
that sale of said parcels be limited to abutting property owners for attachment
thereto.
ADOPTED this 19th day of November, 1990.
Motion for adoption of the resolutions was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Resolutions adopted.
*BOARD OF REVIEW HEARING DATE SET FOR 4/22191 Motion was made by Member Smith and
was seconded by Member Rice to set April 22, 1991 as hearing date for the Board of
Review.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*1991 COUNCIL MEETING DATES APPROVED Motion was made by Member Smith and was
seconded by Member Rice to approve the following Council Meeting Schedule for 1991
for- months when the regular meeting falls on a holiday:
January - Monday, January 7
Tuesday, January 22
February - Monday, February 4
Tuesday, February 19
September - Monday, September 9
Monday, September 23
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES REPORTED Member Smith reported the following: 1)
The School District and City will meet on November 20 to discuss further
developments for the Senior Citizen Center at the Edina Community Center in an
effort to enhance the Center.
2) South Hennepin Human Services Council - The message is getting out that we
have to decide what SHHSC's mission is to be and the cost thereof and then go back
for funding from the cities. A meeting is scheduled in early December with. the
Council representatives, Executive Committee and City Managers to get to the
bottom line on that issue. Currently, no new director is being hired. Staff
consists of an office manager and one other staff,person.
MAINTENANCE OF CITY'S HOUSING STOCK DISCUSSED Member Smith said he is concerned
that some of the residents are not maintaining their homes and recalled that part
of the City's Mission Statement talks about maintaining the residential community.
He suggested that the Council consider some type of credit against the appraised
value for costs incurred by residents for maintenance work on their properties.
Member Rice said he felt the City should be more pro - active in enforcing existing
codes. It was generally agreed that this issue should be discussed prior to the
Council Strategic Planning Session in March. A Saturday work session in early
January was suggested.
FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE DETO% CENTER TO BE CLOSED. Manager Rosland reported that he and
Chief Craig Swanson had attended a meeting last week regarding the potential
closing of the Eden Prairie Detox Center operated by Fairview Southdale Hospital.
Fairview Southdale wanted to lobby Hennepin County more aggressively in an effort
to keep the center open. Other alternatives were considered, i.e. sobering house,
which the County may consider supporting instead of the medical model that the
Fairview Southdale Detox Center offers.
If the detox center is closed, the Edina Police Officers will have to use the
facility at Plymouth (medical' model) or Minneapolis at 18th Street /Chicago Avenue
(sobering station). Chief Swanson explained that, if both those facilities are
full, the Police Officers will release the intoxicated individual to a responsible
adult or take the person to the Metropolitan Medical Center emergency.
MLC HOST BREAKFAST FOR LEGISLATORS NOTED Manager Rosland said he would attend the
MLC-Host Breakfast for legislators on December 5, 1990. He suggested that the
Council Members considering attending because Edina has a newly elected
representative for District 42B.
WILDLIFE COMMITTEE TO DEAL WITH WILDLIFE ISSUES Manager Rosland informed the
Council that a committee has been formed, chaired by Assistant Manager Hughes, to
deal with all the issues and problems relating to wildlife (raccoons, geese, deer,
etc.) in the City. The committee will look at existing ordinances and will
consider other ordinance provisions such as "no feed" which may be necessary.
The committee will report their recommendations to the Council at the second
meeting in January, 1991.
*CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to,
approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register
dated 11/19/90 and consisting of 29 pages: General Fund $265,709.33, C.D.B.G.
$35.00, Communications $5,251.00, Art Center $9,709.76, Capital Fund $535.00, Golf
Course Fund $9,944.00, Recreation Center Fund $8,798.43, Gun Range Fund $817.26,
Edinborough Park $17,948.35, Utility Fund $9,880.31, Storm Sewer Utility
$6,754.02, Liquor Dispensary Fund $108,051.28, Construction Fund $341,377.38,
Total $784,811.10; and for confirmation of payment of the following claims as
shown in detail on the Check,Register dated 10/31/90 and consisting of 18 pages:
General Fund $963,362.61, Communications $2,475.02, Art Center $1,133.23, Swimming
Pool Fund $918.46, Golf Course Fund $18,166.26, Recreation Center Fund $13,893.11,
Gun Range Fund $452.18, Edinborough Park $14,555.23, Utility Fund $46,097.62,
Storm Sewer Utility $76.47, Liquor Dispensary Fund $254,606.06, Total
$1,315,736.25
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
There being -no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the
meeting adjourned at 10:47 p.m.
City Clerk
l
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
DECEMBER 3, 1990
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Paulus, Kelly, Rice, Smith and Mayor
Richards.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by
Member Paulus to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING RECONVENED: TESTIMONY SOLICITED: CONTINUED TO 12/17/90
Mayor Richards advised that this was a reconvened meeting of the Truth in Taxation
hearing to solicit public comment on the proposed property tax increase in the
1991 Budget for the City of Edina. He stated that the proposed 1991 Budget will
not be formally adopted until the close of the hearing process and that additional
testimony will be heard at the regular Council Meeting of December 17.
Mayor Richards reiterated that the budget process began earlier in the year when
the Council established guidelines for budget assumptions. Staff then estimated
expenditures and revenues-for 1991 and the, Council accepted a proposed 1991 Budget
totaling $13,577,622 for purposes of holding the Truth in Taxation hearings as
mandated by state statute. He observed that approximately 77% of the proposed
budget would be raised by real estate taxes, with the balance coming from various
fees and charges. Expenditures for 1991 for delivery of services are estimated to
increase by 4.2% over 1989, resulting in a 3.9% increase in real estate taxes.
Mayor Richards then called for comments from the audience. Hearing none, Mayor
Richards declared the hearing adjourned to December.17, 1990, at 7 p.m.
PUBLIC HEARING CONCLUDED ON REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR FARRELLS
PARKWOOD KNOLLS - TRACT A. R.L.S. 1286 (5700 BLAKE RD); NO ACTION TAKEN
Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner
Larsen recalled that the request for preliminary plat approval for Farrells
Parkwood Knolls - Tract A, R.L.S. 1286 (5700 Blake Rd) was first heard on
November 19, 1990. The request is for a three lot subdivision on the west side of
Blake Road and south of South Knoll Drive. At the November 19 meeting the Council
continued the hearing and requested further information relative to specifics of
the new lots proposed in the plat: 1) Footprint and design of house proposed for
Lot 2, 2) Location of proposed driveways, 3) Landscaping or vegetation plan,
4) Setbacks for homes on Lots 2 and 3,.and 5) Location of conservation easements
on Lots 1 and 3.
In response the proponents have submitted a revised site plan and an outline of
their proposed development restrictions illustrating the following:
Lot 1 - The existing house has driveway access to Blake Road. The revised
plan suggests abandoning the Blake access and construction of a new garage
served by a driveway from South Knoll Drive. The driveway curves to avoid
larger trees on the site. There.is no conservation easement suggested for
Lot 1.
Lot 2 - A one story walkout rambler style home is illustrated. "Proposed
restrictions suggest,a setback from South Knoll of not less than 120 feet and
would require a variance. The. driveway for Lot 2 would also come off of
South Knoll Drive.
Lot 3 - Remains essentially unchanged. A 100 foot conservation easement
adjacent to the pond is illustrated.
If the revised proposal meets with Council approval, staff would recommend that
preliminary approval be conditioned on: l) Developers Agreement, 2) Restrictive
Covenants Agreement,.and 3) Granting of lot width variances for Lots 1 and 3 as
required by the Subdivision Ordinance at final plat approval.
Presentation for Proponent
James Van Valkenburg, representing the proponents, stated that they have attempted
to respond to the questions raised by the Council and are back to request
preliminary plat approval. He explained that the revised site plan illustrates
two driveways coming in from South Knoll not over 12 feet wide. For Lot 1 the
driveway location may change to preserve the large tree in the center-of the
property. He reiterated that all of the proposed lots are substantially larger
than the neighborhood median of 20,000 square feet, i.e. Lot 1 at 32,300 square
feet, Lot 2 at 26,700 square feet and Lot 3 at 36,700 square feet.
As now proposed, the proponents are requesting a lot width variance of four feet
on Lot 1. On Lot 3 they are asking for a lot width variance from 130 feet to 108
feet for the reason that the home will be sited back in on the lot. The ordinance
requirement as to lot width is aimed at the width of a lot at the place of
construction. The building pad for Lot 2 would take advantage of the two hills on
the property. As to Lot 3 where the Farrells intend to build, a 100 foot
conservation easement adjacent to the pond will be provided. Mr. Van Valkenburg
then introduced Mr. Kennedy, builder for the Farrells.
Using photographs Mr. Kennedy pointed out and explained that footprints for the
houses proposed were placed so as to preserve the large trees on all of the lots.
He said that the garage on Lot 2 could be turned somewhat, that the house would
have a hip roof which would nestle in on the lot and would have 2100 square feet
on the first floor. For the Farrells' new house on Lot 3, the large oak tree
closest to the house could probably be saved if the deck could overhang the
conservation easement.
Mr. Van Valkenburg then spoke to the proposed restrictions that would be placed on
the lots: 1) one level house with maximun height of 20 feet, 2) 120 foot setback
from South Knoll Drive, 3) house no larger than 2,500 square feet excluding
garage, 4) potentially two curb cuts on South Knoll Drive, one on Blake Road, and
5) open space and conservation easements over entire lots (no removal of trees
except less that 3" diameter or dead or diseased except for building footprint,
with 100 foot conservation easement on Lot 3, and 6) architectural committee.
Public Comment
Thomas Wurst, 6205 South Knoll Drive, said it was his understanding from
presentations made at the last meeting that the Council had held in abeyance the
concept of a three lot subdivision. He said .that he and his wife have not changed
their position. They would go along with two lots but object to the proposed
three lots. They are still concerned as to the aesthetics, economic impact and
failure to conform with the developed lots on the south side of South Knoll Drive.
In particular, they .feel that if the three lots are developed a substantial number
of trees will be removed and that the natural slopes will be disturbed. Mr. Wurst
stated that Lot 3 is acceptable to them but they feel that the proposed Lots 1 and
2 should remain as they are at the present time.
Max Bowler, 6112 Kaymar Drive, stated that the proposal would change the character
of the neighborhood. Although the large trees will be preserved, the smaller
vegetation will have to come out. Further, that.the three lot subdivision as
illustrated gives the feeling of being crowded.
Carol Mahony, 6216 Schaefer Circle, commented that she was opposed to three lots
being developed on the subject property.
�7
Council Comment
Mayor Richards recalled that at the last meeting the Council had deferred action
and had concurred that they would consider a three lot subdivision if the two
property owners, Farrells and Wursts, were able to get together on a specific plan
for development of three homes on three lots. What is before the Council is a
staff report and Planning Commission recommendation and a proposal by the
proponents that is not subservient by the adjacent property owner. Member Rice
asked for clarification of the Council's options.
Attorney Erickson explained the process as follows. After hearing and
recommendation of the Planning Commission, the Council must act to either grant
preliminary approval with or without conditions or give preliminary and final
approval at one hearing with or without conditions. If conditions are imposed at
preliminary approval they must be met before final approval is granted. The
Council may also deny the subdivision on the theory that it does not comply with
the Zoning Ordinance because variances are required. In order for variances to be
granted, the proponents must show an undue hardship which is defined as something
other than economic and which is based upon circumstances unique to the property
and not created by the property owner.
Member Rice raised the question as to what proposal the Planning Commission saw
and upon which they based their recommendation for denial. Planner Larsen
explained that initially the preliminary plat submitted showed three lots with
Lots 1 and 2 oriented east to west. Throughout the process Lot 3 has remained the
same. Just prior to the meeting of the Planning Commission a revised preliminary
plat was submitted that showed the northerly portion of the property as one lot
for the existing house with Lot 3 unchanged which the Planning Commission voted to
approve. Following that, the proponents decided not to proceed to the Council but
instead returned to the Planning Commission with a revised three lot subdivision.
The northerly portion of the proposed plat was then divided east /west to allow a
greater setback from South Knoll Drive. The Planning Commission recommended
denial of that three lot subdivision.
Member Paulus observed that one issue would be the variances that Lot 2 would
require. No hardship is indicated until the property would be subdivided and if
granted could set an unusual precedent.
Member Smith commented that as he looked at the neighborhood on South Knoll Drive
on a square foot basis, the proposed lots would fit in there with the exception of
the Wurst's lot. However, the topograph goes from one extreme to the other. He
suggested that the proposal be sent back for revision so that no variances would
be necessary.
Mayor Richards submitted that good planning would suggest that three lots not be
approved. taking into account the physicial characteristics, the existing home and
the fact that this appears to be economically driven. He said he would support
reaffirming the Planning Commission recommendation.
Member Rice said he would like.to see this go back to the Planning Commission
because there has been four plans presented for this property. Although the lots
do conform in size to all but the Wurst property and is an unique piece of .
property, he said he was concerned about the Lot 2 variances.
Member Rice moved that this be referred back to the Planning Commission with the
proposal as now presented or any revision the proponents may wish to present and
then bring it back to the Council with the Planning Commission's recommendation on
on Tuesday, January 22, 1991. Motion was seconded by Member'Smith.
Ayes: Rice, Smith
Nays: Kelly, Paulus, Richards '
Motion failed.
Mayor Richards moved that the matter be continued to the meeting of December 17,
1990. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards
Nays: Paulus, Rice, Smith
Motion failed.
Member Smith made a motion to grant the four foot lot width variance for Lot 1.
Motion.failed for lack of second.
No further action by the Council being offered, Mayor Richards stated that the
matter would sit until the proponent requests that the Council take action on the
preliminary plat.
LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR 5109 WEST 50TH STREET PROPERTY (REGIS CORPORATION /S00
LINE RAILROAD) .Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Paulus
for adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute various separate
parcels:
Parcel A
Lots 1 and the East 90 feet of Lots 20, 21 and 22, Block 2, "GRANDVIEW
HEIGHTS"
Lots 3 to 7 inclusive, Block 8, " TINGDALE BROS' BROOKSIDE"
That part of Hopkins Road, vacated, lying between lines drawn across it from
the Southeast corner of Lot 7, Block 8, " TINGDALE BROS' BROOKSIDE ", to the
Northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 2, "GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS" and from the
Southwest corner of Lot 5 in said Block 8 to the Northwest corner of the East
90 feet of Lot 22, in said Block 2, according to the recorded plats thereof.
Parcel B
All of Lot 1 and Lot ,2 except that part of said Lot 2 lying Northerly of the
following described line:
Beginning at a point on the East line of Lot 2 distant 20 feet'South of the
Northeast corner thereof; thence running Southwesterly to a point on the West
line of said Lot 2 distant 40 feet South of the Northwest corner thereof,
Block 8 " TINGDALE BROS.' BROOKSIDE ", according to the plat thereof on file or
of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for-said County
(Hennepin County).
Parcel C
That part of Hopkins Road, vacated, and that part of Government Lot Five (5),
Section Twenty Eight (28), Township One Hundred Seventeen (117) North, Range
Twenty One (21) West and that part of Lots 20, 21, and 22, Block 2, GRAND
VIEW HEIGHTS described as follows:
Beginning at the southwest corner of Lot 5, Block 8, TINGDALE BROS'
BROOKSIDE; thence South 23 degrees 48 minutes 29 seconds West, assumed
bearing, a distance of 66.27 feet to the northwest corner of the East 90
feet of Lot 22, Block 2, GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS; thence South 00 degrees 15
minutes 00 seconds West along the west line of the east 90 feet of said
Lots 20, 21 and 22, Block 2, a distance of 177.68 feet to the south line of
said Lot 20, Block 2; thence North 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West
along the south line of said Lot 20, Block 2,,a distance of 2.00 feet;
thence North 00 degrees 15 minutes 00 seconds East, parallel with said west
line of the East 90 feet of Lots 20, 21 and 22, Block 2, a distance of
376.34 feet; thence South 89 degrees 45 minutes 00 seconds East, a distance
of 28.12 feet to the west line of Block 8, TINGSDALE BROS' BROOKSIDE;
thence South 00 degrees 05 minutes 50 seconds West along said west line of
Block 8, a distance of 137.90 feet to the point of beginning, according to
the recorded plats thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to subdivide said tracts
into the following described new and separate parcel:
All of Parcels A, B and C as described above
,WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said
Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the
Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in ,the City of Edina Ordinances
Nos. 804 and 825;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is
hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 804 and
Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof
as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any
other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further
subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent
ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may
be provided for by those ordinances.
Resolution adopted on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR FERTILIZER FOR BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE Motion was made by Member
Kelly and was seconded by Member Paulus for award of bid'for fertilizer for
Braemar Golf Course to recommended low bidder, Precision Turf, at $9,114.56.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR GOLF CARTS Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by
Member Paulus for award of bid for six golf carts to recommended low bidder,
E Z Go Upper Midwest, at $12,700.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES FOR ENTERPRISE FUNDS PRESENTED AND DISCUSSED Finance Director
John Wallin presented the Executive Summary Income and Expense Reports for the
nine months ended September 30, 1990, for all the City's Enterprise Funds. Member
Smith asked if the amounts listed for depreciation are included in the City's
budget. Director Wallin explained that depreciation is purely an accounting
matter. Because these funds are set up as enterprise funds, as part of the annual
audit procedure the auditors require us to account for depreciation. He explained
that the income before depreciation figure for each fund actually reflects the
operating cash position. Discussion followed on the issue of whether the City
should actually "bank" funds for depreciation, with no formal action taken.
It was the consensus of the Council that a summary of the balance sheets for the
enterprise funds be provided for the next quarterly report.
APPEAL OF RONALD EDBLOM REGARDING MASSAGE LICENSE CONSIDERED: APPLICANT TO
RE- SUBMIT APPLICATION Mayor Richards pointed out that the appeal of Ronald Edblom
concerns his application to practice massage at the Edina Country Club. Because
some of the Council are members of the Edina Country Club, he asked if anyone felt
they had a conflict of interest in considering this matter. Mayor Richards and
Members Rice and Smith each stated that they did not consider the fact that they
are members to be a conflict.
Della V.. Boutrous, Adams & Cesario, P.A., stated that she was representing Ronald
Edblom in the appeal of the massage license denial. She stated that on October
17, 1990, her client was advised that his application for an individual massage_
license had been denied because of falsification of information on the
application. Further, that background investigation revealed information Contrary
to that indicated on the application; specifically that Mr. Edblom had answered
"no" to a question regarding conviction of a criminal offense other than a traffic
offense. Ms. Boutrous explained that the conviction stemmed from an incident when
her client was 19 years old. At the time he understood that once a plea was
entered that the allegation against him would be continued and then dismissed if
he complied with the terms of the sentence and probation. Based on that
.assumption, he felt he had answered the question on the application truthfully.
Ms. Boutrous submitted that her client.is deserving of a license of this type as
he is committed to being a responsible, competent massage therapist. He holds two
certificates of training, esalen therapeutic massage and sports technician
massage.. He has taken out liability insurance to protect his clients and
responses from his clients have been positive. Ms. Boutrous asked that the
Council reverse the denial for an individual massage license for Mr. Edblom.
Mayor Richards asked what the options were for Council action. Attorney Erickson
said the Council could either refer the matter back to staff for conclusion of the
investigation and its recommendation on the merits, or allow the applicant to
re- submit a corrected.application and the investigation proceed to its conclusion.
Following discussion and questions directed to the applicant, Member Kelly made a
motion that the applicant be allowed to re- submit an application for an individual
massage license and that the investigation proceed. Motion was seconded by Member
Rice.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
REQUEST TO ALLOW RESIDENTIAL PARKING IN.50TH & FRANCE MUNICIPAL PARKING RAMPS
CONSIDERED: POLICY UNCHANGED Manager Rosland informed the Council that a letter
had been received from Mary C. Layer, resident at the Lanterns Condominiums on
51st Street, requesting that she and presumably other residents be issued a parking
permit to park in the 51st Street municipal parking ramp. Ms. Layer's request was
previously considered by the City Council on November 21, 1988. At that meeting
the Council denied the request based upon the following reasons: 1) The City
_._ discourages.overnight parking in municipal ramps due to risk of vandalism, etc.,
and 2) Concern that if.overnight parking were granted, individuals may ask for
long -term storage of vehicles which would conflict with the intended purpose of
the ramps. In staff's opinion, the concerns expressed two years ago remain valid
and denial is recommended.
It was the consensus of the Council that the previous policy remain unchanged and
'that staff draft a letter to Ms. Layer advising her that the policy remains the
same.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF 1991 POLICE TEAMSTERS CONTRACT TENTATIVELY APPROVED
Manager Rosland informed the Council that the following economic issues have been
tentatively agreed upon for the 1991 Teamsters Contract: 1) Wages for 1991 - 4%
increase, and 2) Employer's insurance contribution - $210.00 /month. These
increases are consistent with the budgeted amounts proposed in the 1991 Budget
currently under consideration. Staff would recommend tentative approval.,
Member Paulus made a motion for tentative approval of the staff recommendations
regarding the 1991 Teamsters Contract relating to wages and employer's insurance
contribution, subject to final adoption of the 1991 Budget for the City of Edina.
Motion was seconded by Member Smith.
Ayes.: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried:
*PROPOSAL OF METRO RELATIONS. INC. TO MONITOR MWCC CONTINUED TO 12/17/90 Motion
was made by Member Kelly.and was seconded by Member Paulus to continue
consideration of the proposal of Metro Relations, Inc.'to monitor the Metropolitan
Waste Control Commission to December 17, 1990.
Motion carried on rollca,ll vote, five ayes..
*YEAR END COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR 12127/90 Notion was made by Member Kelly and
was seconded by Member Paulus setting December 27, 1990, at 4:30 p.m. as the.Year
End Council Meeting date.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*ANNUAL COUNCIL DINNER MEETING WITH ADVISORY BOARDS SET FOR 3/12/91 Motion was
made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Paulus that the 1991 Annual
Council Dinner Meeting with advisory boards /commissions be held on Tuesday,
March 12, 1991, at 6:00 p.m. at Braemar Clubhouse.
Motion carried on rollcall vote,.five ayes.
COUNCIL WORK SESSION ON HOUSING SCHEDULED -FOR 1/12/91 Manager Rosland suggested
two possible dates, Saturday, January 5 or Saturday, January 12 for the Council
Work Session on Housing. It was the consensus of the Council that the meeting be
held on Saturday, January 12 from 8:00 a.m. to noon at Arneson Acres Park. Mayor
Richards submitted proposed agenda items and asked that the Council Members advise
him or the Manager of any additional issues prior to the meeting.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES REPORTED The following intergovernmental activities
and issues were discussed:
1. Letter of Alison D. Fuhr addressed to Governor -Elect Carlson,regarding
potential appointment. Mayor Richards said he was unclear as to whether she
was seeking City support for a specific position and that he would follow up
on this.
2. South Hennepin Human Services Council - Member Smith reported that the
planning committee is coming forth with a plan to obtain a grant to fund and
replace First Call For Help. The proposal would still require $25,000 from
the participating cities and would be a direct provision of services. He has
suggested that the concept be presented to the SHHSC Board and then to the
cities for approval before further action. Also, the board will meet with the
city managers on December 6, 1990, to consider the reorganization of SHHSC to
respond to the needs of the city managers and Hennepin County regarding human
services.
3. School Board Strategic Planning Quarterly Report - Member Paulus reported that
all the strategic planning objectives of the School Board are being met and
are moving forward. The report will be on file with the City Manager for
reference.
4. Council /School Board Meeting - Member Kelly suggested that the Council meet
with the School Board to discuss mutually the impact of School and City
budgets on residents.
MLC ANNUAL LEGISLATIVE DINNER SCHEDULED FOR 1/30/91 Manager Rosland reminded the
Council that the MLC Annual Legislative Dinner has been tentatively set for
Wednesday, January 30, 1991 at the Decathlon Club. Reservations can be made
through his office.
MLC LEGISLATIVE BREAKFAST SCHEDULED FOR 1215/90 Manager Rosland reminded the
Council that the MLC Legislative Breakfast is scheduled for December 5, 1990 at
7:30 a.m. Reservations are due by December 4 and will be made for those Council
Members who can attend.
EDINA FOUNDATION'S CONTRIBUTION TO .FUTURES COMMISSION NOTED Mayor Richards
advised that he had received a letter from the Chairman of The Edina Foundation
Board complimenting the Futures Commission on their excellent report. The
Foundation'had also enclosed their contribution of $5,000.00 towards the Futures
Commission project.
CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Paulus to
approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Registered
dated 12/03/90 and consisting of 21 pages: General'Fund $95,613.56, C.D.B.G.
$6,724.00, Communications $2,458.29, Art Center $84,405.64, Capital Fund $784.70,
Golf Course Fund $25,385.67, Recreation Center Fund $3,337.64, Edinborough Park
I
'$10,439.63, Utility Fund $232,831.97, Storm Sewer Utility $1,864.00, Liquor
Dispensary Fund $5,907.47, Construction Fund $45,060.63, Total $514,813.20.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the
meeting adjourned at 10 :47 p.m.
City Cler
_ t�\nlrl.n c tu►1:. R.V.. �t. ;\.
l.irrNSrd l'�r.lr�.heGisl
M A V I S C. I OSSUNI. M.: \., l'( UC' -R
l.irrnx d h r'rh e,/, ,i. I
Lirnlsrd .Vul" hn r• c@ !'umi /r 7hcrapi.sl
I I I A I I -: L. IIANSI•.N. M.A., CCIX %R
l,ir r llm-d l ti rrhnhe. i.w
l.iee-n.se l Ilarriu,4c d' l'unuh' l'hrrupisi
January 31, 1991
_John Mooty
Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty and Bennett, P.A.
Law Offices
3400 City Center
33 South 6th Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Dear Mr. Mooty:
AGENDA ITEM II.A.
SIIARON WOLFF' ONDICII. M.A.
Licensed Ns.rr•heeG.,tl.s!
(SARI' R. PERRIN, 1110).
Licensed C'onsulling P.spc•hologist
PAUL R. IIJELL1�., M.S.M. )IV.
Llee nse'd Social Wen-ke•r
I have been asked by Dr. Joyce Anderson, a Licensed Consulting
Psychologist, to assist in clarifying the standard of practice as it
relates to the private practice of psychology. I am currently serving
as the President of the Minnnesota Psychologists in Private Practice.
This is an organization' composed of psychologists from throughout the
state of Minnesota who are currently engaging in private practice. In
this role, I have had the occasion to interact with the bulk of my
membership and a large number of individuals in private practice who
are not part of our professional group.
I have discovered that it is, in fact, a usual and customary procedure
for private practice psychologists to offer, service hours that may
extend throughout the day and into the evening. These hours may begin
as early as 7 AM and extend to as late as 8 PM or later. I suspect
that this is due to a variety, of factors, but is certainly- an attempt
on the part of the profession to offer much needed services to the
consumer.
As far as I know, this has been the case for many years and I anticipate
it being the case for some time to come. I do hope that this small bit
of information assists in clarifying the concern regarding Dr. Anderson's
practice. If I can be of further assistance, please feel free to
contact me,.
Sincerely,
Gary R. Perrin, Ph.D.
Licensed Consulting Psychologist
GRP:nac
CC: Dr. �jyce Anderson
Edina City Council Members
Fw*.haaW & lCed&
1809 Plymouth Road South *Suite 2209Minnetonka, MN 55343•(612) S45.4494
'mot ?,��•= •::�:,�'�5� ' �;�
}f.:,1 .1
71E6 Cornelis urive
:aims., in. b543b
Jan. 23, 2�C1
,)cur i:lembers of' ?dina City Council,
w-1- aid not sF.na a lets -:.r to you before tr.c City Council meetin.g
Jon. 22 (vi :icn wci aiu at-reno), but want to tr:ke tr:is ojiportunity
to go on recora :: s bein , oprosr:ci to the issuance of tL temoorury
conaitional use permit to Joyce Anaerson tisitriout specific con -
aitions.
i.irs. Pi.ulusl point was particularly wall tatien tr':At Atr.Out Specifics
`
Lucre could be tfie: opening of t:.e provf -rbial n c =;n of worms` >.s to
•a.nat other busincss .s mirnt svrine _ azna ,_:t tip;: ut hours. Srie, ulonr
v ;iti's ,;r. Emit.. c ;._'r. aichurus, hLu points ti,ut ere re very vell t:.ken
una wf are rjaa Vie o(;rr..it .%as auniEu.
ce are certainly not agt:inst hanaici occ;a people �arninF a living-,.
�e urr o ;;.osc:a to mt,nipulutiv,- ^eoplc: playing on sympt;thies to fur -
tiicr ti eir own cause. There is r real concern in the neik- hborr:oou
Lis to cne: uegree or uisubility that r,:ally exists. If' tiiere ..re
unaublisireu aisabilitie:s to xnici_ titre are not "privy" tt:Lt is her
privilege to eoncuat, but it aoes not lena s- r::path -y or sapport
to :ier situation.
ie Lrc um:ble to uttena -che next council meeting but certeinly
hope u new more sari nrent tE:mpor,iry ccnuiti:)nvl use p: ":rIr11t ,:ill
be eonsiaered befor- one is
�s resiaents Of :__dint' 117 t :':1S 1OCitLirin i•Or 2�, yctirs v.f: c`rtc.inly
ao not 1i::c> ti.E� iaeu. of,,)-rr.?ittinrr businesses in resiacntd�1 ur(,as:
liianx you nor your consi;::_:r?aion.
Sincerely,
'':r. , rs. ova rXn cf:rg
v
- `�\
WNIAL GiURCH OF EDINA
January 30, 1991
Kenneth Rosland
Edina City Manager
Edina City Hall
4801 W. 50th St.
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mr. Rosland:
I am writing to you in my capacity as the Minnesota
Psychological Association's liaison Person for disability
issues related to the practice of psychology in Minnesota.
The Minnesota Psychological Association (MPA) has an active
concern for insuring the rights of persons with disabilities
as well as the rights of all persons who seek mental health
services.
It has come to our attention that Dr. Joyce Anderson has not
been able to reach a satisfactory resolution of her zoning
issue with you and the Edina City Council. I urge you to
take into consideration the following points:
1. Disabled persons in the practice of Psychology often need
to structure their Practices around their disability.
Accommodations for a disabling condition -can take a
variety of forms. MPA has a long- standing interest in
insuring that qualified disabled persons have equality of
access to employment through reasonable accommodations
for their diability. Dr. Anderson's disability
necessitates practicing in her home. This certainly
seems to be a reasonable accommodation for her particular
disabling condition.
2. The American Psychological Association (APA) and MPA are
especially concerned about.discriminatory attitudes
toward persons who utilize the services of -psychologists
and other mental health professionals. The APA has taken
an active interest in a number of legal actions in other
(over)
COMMUNITY CONGREGATIONAL • 6200 COLONIAL WAY, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55436 • 612/925 -2711
cities which involved attempts to r.est.rici- zonini' to n_ro-
hibit mental health services in residential neighbor-
hoods, based upon discriminatory attitudes and
stereotypes.
3. Persons who seek the services of a psychologist have a
right to choose the therapist who is most. competent and
qualified to meet their particular needs. Citizens who
choose to see Dr. Anderson for psychotherapy for personal
growth have a right to meet with her at a mutually
convenient place and time.
4. In order to meet the needs of their clients, many
psychotherapists find it necessary to,provide late
afternoon and evening appointment hours. Frequently our
clients are people with professional responsibilities who
are unable to schedule personal appointments during
business hours. Dr. Anderson should be able to schedule
appointments to accommodate the needs of her clients.
I hope you will take these points into consideration in your
negotiations with Dr. Anderson. If necessary, the Minnesota
Psychological Association Executive Council will take further
action
Sincerely,
Lynn Lockhart, Ph.D., L.C.P.
MPA Representative to American Psychological Association
Committee on Psychology and Disability
CC: Susan Rydell, Ph.D., President,
Minnesota Psychological Association
John;Mooty, Attorney at Law
FIS
6 A/1 a_
M
1 ' MAYO S. BRANDJORD
7112 Glouchester
Edina, Minnesota 55435
(612) 925 -2690
February 1, 1991
Edina Mayor Richards
City Council Members
City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
RE: Amendment to zoning ordinance #825 as it applies to Dr. Joyce Anderson,
owner and resident at 7121 Glouchester Avenue
Greetings:
My wife and I own our house at 7112 Glouchester Avenue which we purchased in
1976. I have attended all but one of the City Hall meetings related to the referenced
issue.
The use of Dr. Anderson's home has been given a fair hearing. I do not believe that
there is anything new of importance to present to the Council. Therefore, I hope
that the Council will try very hard to render a fair decision at the February 4
meeting.
In the following I will review some of the information put before the Council that I
think should dictate the Council's final decision:
1. The Council acted wisely when it amended the referenced Ordinance #825 to
accommodate the handicapped. The Council also acted wisely when it kept a
tight control over the application approval process. The amendment gives
voice and protection to the neighborhood. The Council will have final control
over the use of private homes for business purposes in Edina, which will
prevent any abuse. However, when the Council reviews an application, it must
not place more restrictions on one applicant than on another, handicapped or
non - handicapped. All restrictions should be reasonable and have a sound basis
for being applied. If the approval includes too many restrictions, it becomes
only a cruel sham. The applicant must be able to &ive normal expected hours
of service and must be able to make a reasonable income.
2. Dr. Anderson is an established resident of Edina. She has served clients in her
homes for seven or eight years. First, one block south of her present home and
three to four years at 7121 Glouchester Avenue. She is not an interlooper who
sneaked into the neighborhood. She purchased her home openly and made a
point of meeting with her new neighbors and told them about her practice. In
earlier years she taught piano to hundreds of students in her home at other
locations and was unaware of any restrictions on the use of her home for
present clients.
Edina Mayor Richards
February 1, 1991
Page Two
3. Dr. Anderson's clients add very little vehicular traffic to Glouchester Avenue.
There is not a traffic problem, even with many neighbors operating two and
three cars and have teenage drivers. There should never be a question about
how many clients use her driveway because it can be checked against Dr.
Anderson's client logs.
4. Those who claim that Dr. Anderson should be able to operate from a medical
building, ignore the professional medical opinion on her physical limitations.
Where medical buildings do provide special ingress and egress and toilet
accommodations for the handicapped, that's about it. Medical examining
rooms certainly are not appropriate for counseling and certainly do not make
allowances for Dr. Anderson's physical limitations. The limited hours Dr.
Anderson can physically work also limits the number of clients she can see in
one day, and of course limits her income. The size of her practice will not
support the expense of a little used office.
5. I repeat what I have stated before the Council. Dr. Anderson is a credit to our
neighborhood and has not caused any problems over the three or four years she
has served her clients in her home on our block. The whole dispute over her
use of her home should not have been taken to the Planning Department in the
first place. That action is now a confirmed shame, and regretted by almost all
of the neighbors.
I ask that the Council approve Dr. Anderson's application without any limitations on
the hours and days of the week she can see her clients.
Respectfully submitted,
Mayo S. Brand] - -
January 31, 1991
7113 Cornelia Drive
Edina, MN 55435
Edina City Council
Edina City Hall
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mayor Richards and City Council Members:
The subject of this letter is the attempt by Dr. Joyce Anderson
to practice psychology at her residence for more than the allowable
number of patients, 10, that she is allowed to see according to the
city codes. My wife and I were in attendence at the last council
meeting where Dr. Anderson was denied a chance to see twenty
clients a week. The analogy that several council members used was
to compare Dr. Anderson, who is a psychologist, seeing clients or
patients who are troubled in some way, and that of a piano teacher,
who is seeing younger members of the community in a teaching of an
art, is inconceivable to me. What these two council members have
tried to do is totally wrong.
They based their argument solely on traffic which is a great concern
to all those in our neighborhood. The mother, father etc. who is
dropping their child off for a piano lession is not the same type
of person who is entering our neighborhood as is the patient who is
coming to see Dr. Anderson. This patient could be under stress,
anxious or in some other troubled way. The result of the counseling
session might produce a hostile or troubled person who may do
anything. This is not the type of person that I or any member of my
family want in my neighborhood.
With Dr. Anderson, the matter of her convienience is what this
matter is all about. How can anyone say that she can only spend two
hours a day at her office. She simply wants to practice psychology
at her house at the expense of her neighbors and our neighborhood
without having to pay the cost of doing business.
Sincerly,
Paul S. Wehrmeister
Joan C. Wehrmeister
Z� t � �-' 0 4" - xo�
qti.� a. Sri
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
HASE
TO: , Mayor Richards and City Council
FROM: Bob Kojetin
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS
OF $5,000
DATE: February 1, 1991
AGENDA ITEM III I. B.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: 2 Fairway Flowers -with Trade -In
Companv
Amount of Quote or &d
1. North Star Turf, Inc. $45,440.00
Trade -in 13,632.00
$31,808.00
1.- $31,808.00
2. P1.T.I. Distributing $44,340.00
Trade -in 4,700.00
$39,640.00
2.. $39,640.00
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR EID:
North Star Turf, Inc.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Trade -in of 1 1987 HF -5 Jacobsen Hydraulic mower serial x`677562109 for
2 new 5 gang lightweight fairway mowers for
Braemar Golf Course.
Signae Department .
The Recommended bid is
within budget not within bujC ljet Wallin, 4nance Director
Kenneth Roslan4 City Manager
9` A. _lrl
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor Richards and Council Members
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director Park and Recreation
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF 15,000
DATE: January 30, 1991 AGENDA ITEM III' C.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: ,,Ton Cargo Van
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
�. North Star Dodge 1. $11,028.95
2• (Hennepin County Contract #1678A0) 2,
3. 3
4. 4
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
North Star Dodge $11,028.95
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Replacement for 1978 Ford Van, used by park custodian.
l
� J l
Department
The Recommended bid is X
within budget not
Kenneth Rosland, City
Finance Director
of
4 0`.A J 12
RC
HASE REQUEST FOR PU
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Ted Paulfranz, Fire Chief
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE M EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: January 30, 1991 AGENDA ITEM . III. D.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Replacement Defibrillator /Monitors (2)
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Physio Control 1. $14,950
2. Matrx 2. $12,530
3. 3.
4. 4
5. 5
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Physio Control Lifepak 10, at $14,950
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Portable defibrillator /monitor (Paramedic equipment) to replace
existing units. Funding source would be Equipment Replacement.
My recommendation is for the Physio Control unit, because the
Matrx does not meet all provisions for performance criteria,
particularly in service and maintenance.
Our present units are Physio Control. We have had 10 years of
- excellent service /support experience.
Additionally, our ical Director, Dr. Crimmins, has reviewed
both uni s and its ur decision.
FIRE
Signature Department
The Recommended bid is
within budget not withi bu et Wallin, Fi ce Director
t
enneth Rosland City Manag
:6
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: November 26, 1990
TO: _. Ted Paulfranz, Fire Chief
FROM: Terry Kehoe, Assistant Fire Chief
SUBJECT: REPLACEMENT OF PHYSIO- CONTROL LIFEPAK 5
DEFIBRILLATOR /MONITORS
I am recommending the purchase of two (2) Physio- Control Lifepak 10
defibrillator /monitor units to replace the current Lifepak 5 units now in.service.
The Lifepak 5 equipment is now over ten years old and becoming more susceptible to
repairs and operational failures. While these Lifepak 5 units have performed
admirably, it is now time to replace and upgrade, including: pacemaker capability
(external non - invasive electronic heart pacemaker) and code summary (a feature
documenting on paper any monitor /defibrillation activities).
In researching other similar equipment on the market, there is only one•other unit,
Life Defense Plus, sold by Matrx Medical, Inc., that is designed for ALS
pre - hospital use.
In comparing this equipment, I found the following:
* Only on weekdays „& we must send unit to Buffalo, NY
** Unit new on market July, 1990
** *Not including $1,100 in repairs for LDP
In conclusion, Physio Control has provided us with consistent and exceptional
service, both in equipment operation and sales /service support since 1974. I
strongly recommend we replace our equipment as soon as possible, using replacement
funds, with Lifepak 10 defibrillator /monitor units.
Life
Lifepak 10
Defense Plus
1.
Able to use our current battery system
Yes
No
2.
Number of batteries in each unit
3
3.
Batteries compatible with other EFD equipment.
Yes
No
4.
'Fast charge batteries
Yes
No
5.
Code Summary (documentation of events with time/
Yes
No
date, ECG, shocks delivered, etc.
6.
Uses compatible paper with units in service in Metro
area Yes
No
7.
Non - invasive pacing
Yes
Yes
8.
Portable, under 22 pounds
Yes
Yes
9.
Non - Fade (in sunlight, etc.) ECG Scope
Yes
No
10.
On -site service capability (24 hours a day)
Yes
No
11.
Maintenance agreement capability
Yes
No
12.
Free Loaner (same equipment)
Yes
Yes*
13.
Units in service in Twin City area
Yes
No
14.
Manufactured by Distributor
Yes
No
15.
On market over five years
Yes
No **
16.
Built in United States
Yes
No
17.
Costs: Defibrillator /monitor
$8,625 each
$7,465 each
(includes cables, batteries, carrying case)
X 2 units
x 2 units
$17,250.00
$14,930.00
Trade -In Two (2) Lifepak 5
S2,300.00
S2,400•.00 * **
NS'T COST TO $DIVA FIRB BDDGRT:
$14,950.00
$12,530.00
* Only on weekdays „& we must send unit to Buffalo, NY
** Unit new on market July, 1990
** *Not including $1,100 in repairs for LDP
In conclusion, Physio Control has provided us with consistent and exceptional
service, both in equipment operation and sales /service support since 1974. I
strongly recommend we replace our equipment as soon as possible, using replacement
funds, with Lifepak 10 defibrillator /monitor units.
N
z
Cr REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
O
v u
TO: i.iayor Richards and City Council
FROM: Bob Ko j etin
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE February 1, 1991
AGENDA ITEM
ITEM DESCRIPTION: 6
New Golf Cars for Braemar Golf
Course
EZ -Go -Upper Midwest
Company
Amount of Quote or &d
1.
EZ -Go- Upper Midwest
1_
$13,700.00
2.
Golf- Car - Midwest
2.
$14;950.00
3.
Golf- Cars - Unlimited
3.
$149994.00
4.
4.600.00
4.
$13.700.00
Golf Car Midwest
6 New EZ Co Cars
$181150.00
Trade -In 2 1984 gas EZ go cars
1.400.00
2 1986 gas EZ go cars
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
EZ -Go -Upper Midwest
GENERAL INFORMATION' Purchase of 6
new golf
cars for Braemar Golf
- Course with trade -in.of
4 cars
E_Z_r upper_ N1riv_ea_t
6 New'EZ Co Cars
$18.300.00
Trade -In 2 1984 /EZ go cars
2.000.00
2 1986 EZ go cars
2.600.00
4.600.00
$13.700.00
Golf Car Midwest
6 New EZ Co Cars
$181150.00
Trade -In 2 1984 gas EZ go cars
1.400.00
2 1986 gas EZ go cars
1.800.00
3.200.00
$14.950.00
rnif Cars Unlimited
6 New EZ Co Cars
$18,894.00
Trade -In 2 1984 gas EZ go cars
1.800.00
2 1986,gas EZ go cars
2.100 -00
3.500.00
$14.;994.00 -
,Signature
Department
The Recommended- bid is e
Within budget not within budget s Wallin. inane Director
Q
Kenneth Rosiand. City
i
VILLAGE OF.EDINA i REQUISITION NO.
PURCHASE REQUISITION
-
------------------------ DATE
DELIVER MATERIAL TO:
MATERIAL NEEDED BY: 9 t? % P.O. NUMBER
SUGGESTED SOURCE OR
USUAL SOURCE: !_ �,Z -- G� U pPER_
ADDRESS:
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
UNIT
PRICE
AMOUNT
CHARGE
ACC'T.
6
6x J� *
God f - e040,1 Ni - Swf, ;re2
I3,4sXerJ lK u P1418- s -
TcRRAO:�U,9Rtl
FA ",01
ssl -TRAM E - �✓
-
_ �� - 4;4pA®
a6s Z
pG ,�,
Mod �
o
It
Lv
7NO tit
Airr- 141t6un11- -
cii,lrruuiln %4uvlml.Lu a run ruNu nozo VVLK a1VU. VV
SOURCE: AMnTTmT nr MMTAMTC
L) PP659- AYIDw& r-
PREPARED BY:
APPROVED BY:
DEPARTMENT HEAD
2.)
3.)
DO NOT MARK IN THIS SPACE
RECEIVED 19
APPROVED
PURCHASING DEPT.
EMMO
E-Z-GO Division of Textron Inc.
E -Z-130 Upper Midwest
5105 West 35th Street
St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55426
Phone: 612/922-1550
Fax: 612/922-2944
1i tj
BRAEMAR GOLF CLUB
JANUARY 33, 1991-
14 0 T F.- J
-- n
V. q
v
S
TOTAL ANIQUINT DUE
$13,700.00
�`-,'F:`ER EASSNET.
S`=- PT
L A. C
-7 D
.'%CCEPTED BY:
BRAEMAR GOLF CLUB
3"':
T!7
World's Finest Utility Vehicles for Sports and Industry
B2072
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
CITY OF EDINA
6364 DEWEY HILL ROAD
EDINA. MN
FLEET SALES PROPOSAL
55436
Date:01/25/91
Page: 1
Salesperson: 1
Estimate No: 3801
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quantity :Item Number :List Price :Fleet Price: :Extension :Tx
:Item Description ,
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - ---=
6.0 G9 -AG 4369.00 3025.00 18150.00 N
1991 GAS FLEET'MASTER >
2.0 11 0.00 700.00- 1400.00- N
TRADE -INS:
1984 E -Z -GO 4WG
2.0 11 0.00 900.00- 1800.00- N
TRADE -INS:
1986 E -Z -GO 4WG
------------------------------------------------------------------------=-------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sub Total 14950.00
GOLF CAR MIDWEST
3350 W. HWY 13 Net Total 14950.00
BURNSVILLE, MN Sales Tax'
55337 Proposal*Total: 14950.00
612/890 -5541
GOLF CARTS UNLIMITED
TOURNAMENT FLEET -SPOT LEASES -NEW, RECONDITIONED AND U` -ED
MADEL I A . MN. ( .`_ 07 ) b4' -3' X43
OWNER: ARLEN MALONEY
Braemar Golf Course
6364 Dewey Hill Road
Edina,.Minn. 55435
Attn: Don Klingelhoets
6
This is a bid for the following carts:
6 .... GX
444...... gas ........
$3149.00
ea .............$18894.00'
Trade -in
2..1984.... gas....
900.00
ea........ .. 1800.00
Trade -in
2..]986.... gas....
1050.00
ea............. 2100.00
Thank You ,
if ,Carts Unlimited
Arlen Maloney
1- 507- 642 -3543
14994.00
a
e� 1
�-� %� REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
\• �N Q .
�neroa�`•/
To: KENNETH ROSLAND
From: CRAIG LARSEN
Date: FEBRUARY 4, 1991
Subject: TEMPORARY CONDITIONA
USE PERMIT
Recommendation:
Info/Background-
Agenda Item #
IV-
A.
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr . Recommends
❑
To HRA
0
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
0
Discussion
The temporary conditional use permit process now provides that the
applicant set forth the hours. per day and days per week that
business activity will occur. It does not prohibit or limit when
activities may occur. The provision is designed to provide
flexibility in dealing with varying circumstances. The requested
days and hours of business activity are reviewed during the
required public hearing and may be accepted as proposed or altered
or limited by the City Council.
In granting a temporary conditional use permit the Council must
find that the proposed activity meets the general findings for all
conditional use permits and also complies with the performance
standards for home occupations. (see attached excerpts of Zoning
Ordinance). The Council may grant exceptions to the home
occupation performance standards, but not to the general findings.
I believe that we need the flexibility provided by the ordinance as
now written.. Each case is likely to- present circumstances unique
to the applicant and to their business. Inserting very specific
requirements would likely be troublesome in practice.
4. Commission Review and Recommendation. Within 45 d fter
receipt by the Planning Department of the a ee and all
other information herein required, ' and substance acceptable
to the Planner, the Plann' rtment shall review the application
and other inform ovided by the applicant and forward a report
to the ion. The Commission shall review the report of the
P1 ng Department and send its recommendation to the Council.
Conditional Use 5. City Council Hearing and Decision. Upon request of the
Permit. Section Planner, Manager or applicant, and after review and recommendation by
5. the . Commission, the Council shall, conduct a public hearing regarding•
the application. The hearing shall be held not .later than 60 days
after the date of the recommendation by the Commission. A notice of
the date, time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published
in the official newspaper of the City at least ten days prior to the,
date of the hearing. A similar notice of hearing shall be mailed at
least ten days before the date of the hearing to each owner of
property situated wholly or partly within 500 feet 'of the tract to
which the application relates insofar as the names and addresses of
such owners can reasonably be determined by the Clerk from records
maintained by the Assessor. After hearing the oral and written views
of all interested persons, the Council shall make its decision at the.
same meeting or at a specified future date. No new notice need be
given for hearings which are continued to a specified future date.
The Council shall not grant a conditional use permit unless it finds
that the establishment, maintenance and operation of the use:
(a) will promote and enhance the general public welfare
and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health,
safety, morals and general welfare;
(b) will not cause undue traffic hazards, congestion or
parking shortages;
(c) will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment, or
decrease the value, of other property in the vicinity, and will
not be a nuisance;
(d) will not impede the normal and orderly development and
improvement of:other property in the vicinity;
(e) will not create. an excessive burden on parks, streets
and other public facilities;
(f) conforms to the applicable restrictions and special
conditions of the district in which it is located as imposed by
this ordinance; and
(g) is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
4 -14
}
SECTION 7. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO ALL DISTRI EXCEPT AS
OTHERWISE STATED
A. General. No building or structure shall be cted, constructed
or placed on any property in the City, and no bu' ing or structure or
property in the City shall be used for any p ose, unless in full
compliance with the restrictions and requirem s of this ordinance and
other applicable ordinances of the City.
- - B. Trash Storage.
1. All Properties Exce Sin le Dwelling Unit and Double
Dwelling Unit Buildings. All olid waste material, debris, refuse,
garbage or similar material hall be kept within closed containers
designed for such purpos Said containers shall not be located in
the front yard and sha be completely screened from view from all
lot lines and streets.
2. Sin le lling Unit.and Double Dwel I ing Unit Buildin s.
All solid waste terial, debris, refuse,, garbage or similar material
shall be kep ithia closed containers designed for such purpose.
Said contai s shall not be located in the front yard and shall 'not
be visibl rom the front lot line.
C. ellin Units Prohibited in Accessory Buildin s Temporar
Buildi Trailers and Recreational Vehicles. No accessory building
to ary building, trailer or recreational vehicle in any district shall
b sed for a dwelling unit or units, except for accessory buildings
ich are specifically allowed for residential use by this ordinance.
D. Customary Home Occupations as an Accessory Use.'
1. Customary home , occupations which are permitted as an
accessory use by this ordinance shall comply with the following
conditions:
(a) only the residents 'of the- dwellling unit are employed
on the lot or within the dwelling unit;
(b) no exterior structural modifications are made to
change the residential character and appearance of the lot or
any buildings or structures on the lot;
(c) no loading or unloading or other outdoor activities,
except parking, shall occur;
(d) no signs of any ind shall be used to identify the use;
(e) all parking ,demands generated by the use shall be
accommodated within the accessory garage and the normal driveway
7 -1
e
area and shall not at any one time occupy more than two parking
spaces in parking areas. required for multiple residential
buildings;
(f) no more than ten automobile trips weekly by
individuals other than the residents of the dwelling unit shall
be generated to the dwelling unit as a result of the use; and
(g) no sale of products or merchandise shall occur on the.
lot or within any structures or buildings on the "lot.
2. Permitted customary home occupations include, but ar not
limited to, the following occupations if, and only during suc imes
as, they comply with all of the above conditions:
(a) dressmakers, tailors and seamstresses;
(b) in single dwelling unit and double welling unit
buildings only, ,music and dance teachers prov' ing instruction
to not more than five individuals at a time;
(c) artists, sculptors and authors;
(d) insurance agents, brokers, architects and similar
professionals who typically conduct ient meetings outside of
the dwelling unit;
(e) ministers, rabbis and iests;
(f) photographers pro ding service to one customer at a
f�
time;
(g) salespersons provided that no stock in trade is
maintained on the or in the building or structure on the
lot; and
(h) in s. gle dwelling unit and double dwelling unit
buildings onl rental of rooms for residential occupancy to not
more than t persons per dwelling unit in addition to the
permanent sidents of the dwelling unit.
3. • Th following uses have a tendency to increase in size or
intensity yond the conditions imposed by this ordinance for home
occupatio and thereby adversely affect residential properties.
Therefor the following shall specifically not be permitted as
custom home occupations:
(a) barber shops and beauty.parlors;
(b) repair services of all kinds, including, without
limitation, auto repair and painting, appliance repair and small
engine repair;
7 -2
A.
o e
ineu
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & Council Members
From: Kenneth Rosland
Date: February 1, 1991
-Subject:
STRONG BEER /WINE LICENSE DISCUSSION
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
Iv.c.
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
0
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
Discussion
That the requested attached information regarding strong beer /wine licensing
be reviewed and discussed at the February 4th Council Meeting.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor & Council Members
FROM: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: STRONG.BEER /WINE LICENSE
DATE: February 1, 1991
As requested by the City Council, I submit the following brief report
regarding the relationship of alcohol content in beer and wine. Information
for this report was retrieved from the quality control lab of Stroh's Brewery.
Beer is measured by,percentage of alcohol by weight. Wine is measured by
percentage of alcohol by volume. In order to compare equals, one must add one
percent of alcohol content to beer.
Three -two beer, as it is called, measures anywhere from 2.8% to 3.1% of
alcohol. Six percent or strong beer actually measures from 3.7% to 4.0% of
alcohol.
Conversion Table
Actual
Adjustment
3.2 Beer
2.8 -3.1%
4.0 12
ounces =
.48 ounces
of
alcohol
Strong Beer
3.7 -4.0%
5.0 12
ounces =
.60 ounces
of
alcohol
Wine
14%
0 4
ounces =
.56 ounces
of
alcohol
Wine
14%
0 3
ounces =
.42 ounces
of
alcohol
Blood Alcohol Content Table
Quantity-
Level
Strong Beer
30 ounces
(2
1/2 beers)
0.075
BA
3.2 Beer
36 ounces
(3
beers)
0.075
BA
Wine
12 ounces
(3
wines)
0.075
BA
Legal Limit
= .1
I
ADVISORY POLL
RESULTS NOT BINDING ON, ONLY
ADVISORY TO, EDINA CITY COUNCIL
City of Edina
Hennepin County, Minnesota
November 6, 1984
INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTERS: Voters desiring to vote in
favor of the question, put a cross mark (X) in. the square
�. opposite the word YES. Voters desiring to vote against
the question, put a cross mark (X) in the square opposite
the word NO.
❑ YES ON -SALE WINE LICENSES
"Shall the City of Edina issue on -sale licenses. to
NOqualifying sit -down restaurants to sell wine, in
conjunction with the sale of food ?"
F
I
CITY
OF EDINA
GENERAL ELECTION
RETURNS
NOVEMBER
6, 1984
Page 6 -
--
VOTING PRECINCT
N1
N2
Jp3
#4
R5
86 #7
#8 #9
#10
N11
#12
#13
N14
#15
N16
N17
#18
%' /#19
TOTAL
CITY OF EDINA
MAYOR
C Wayne Courtney
726
770
1,171
1,133
956
1,097 1,073
1,269 970
1,050
1,249
1,106
838
1,194
1,465
1,060
344
313
962
18,146
COUNCIL MEMBER
-John Senior, Jr.
383
374
507
520
434
412 538
732 436
510
651
492
451
729
559
570
179
112
455
.9,044
Leslie C. Turner
477
584
948
693
756
880 736
944 694
701
906
826
463
825
1,158
632
246
240
646
13,355
Peggy Kelly
535
582
925
873
730
873 846
834 727
835
868
790
670
.762
1,101
782
216
233
746
13,928
ADVISORY POLL
ON -SALE WINE LICENSES
,Yes
890
856
1,067
1,102
963
1,170 1,101
1,184 975
1,007_ -1,263
1,084
1,034
1,201
1,599..
1,177
500
373
1,151. -
19,691:'
No
200
260
_397
-322
311
363 361
479. _ 383
323
; 440
364
251
385
438
357
101
142
264
6,141
STATE GENERAL ELECTION
FIRST: PUBLIC LANDS
Yes
809
826
1,125
1,059
1 „014
1,141 1,074
1,260 1,018
1,032
1,258
1,097
869
1,179
1,526
1,129
408'
410
1,017
19,251
No
247
260
275
298
216
307 301
315 279
245
341
280
312
358
380
289
129
92
298
5,222
SECOND: SCHOOL FUNDS
Yes
791
804
1,114
1,054
962
1,120 1,078
1,222 999
1,001
1,229
1.061
866
1,151
1,453
1,130
429
408
1,002
18,874
No
264
278
300
301
270
316 297
344 291
268
369
318
323
368
420
296
112
103
313
5,551
F
I'
�ZN A
o e'
in
N o
Aj
�� • RPOM��O/
lase
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
From: GORDON L. HUGHES
Date: FEBRUARY 4, 1991
[Subject:
WILDLIFE COMMITTEE
REPORT
Recommendation:
Info /Background:
Agenda Item #
IV. D.
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr . Recommends
❑
To HRA
❑
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
In accordance with your request, Bob Kojetin, Dave Velde, Craig
Swanson, Curt Finch and I comprised a committee to study wildlife
issues in Edina. The focus of our study was wildlife /human
conflicts. We did not study any other issues concerning
wildlife.
The committee called upon several experts who provided facts
concerning wildlife /human conflicts. In particular, we consulted
with the Minnesota Department of Health concerning public health
issues, Mr. Arden Aanestad, an Edina resident who served on the
Minnesota River Valley Deer Management Task Force, and Mr. John
Parker, Area Wildlife Manager with the Minnesota Department of
Natural Resources.
ti
FINDINGS
During calendar year 1990, calls for service /advice concerning
wildlife comprised 27% of our animal control calls. Sixty -six
percent related to domestic animals (mostly dogs). Exhibit 1
provides a breakdown of the calls received by month and species.
It is important to note a "call" does not necessarily constitute
a "complaint ". Calls include questions regarding wildlife,
reports concerning dead animals on roadways or reports concerning
injured or sick animals. Although we cannot document the precise
number, we believe that there is a relatively equal distribution
between complaints and animal welfare related calls.
Wildlife populations do not present a significant public health
risk to our residents. Likewise, we cannot find any evidence
that the public health risk will increase in the future.
Lyme disease and rabies are the most significant diseases which
may be transmitted by way of wildlife. Exhibits 2 and 3
summarize our findings as to Lyme disease and rabies
respectively.
Rabies is extremely rare in humans (0 -3 cases reported annually
in the United States). The existence of the disease in animals,
both wild and domestic, in Edina is almost non - existent.
Lyme disease, on the other hand, has become a relatively common
disease. Many of us know someone who has contracted this
potentially serious disease.
The principal vector of Lyme disease is the deer tick. The life
cycle of this tick is rather complicated. However, it is
important to note that the deer tick does not rely solely on deer
for its dissemination. As time goes by, researchers are
discovering that more and more species, both wild and domestic,
serve as a host for the deer tick. We can find no evidence that
controlling Edina's deer population, or any other wildlife
population, will have any effect on the risk of contracting Lyme
disease.
The only other significant wildlife related disease which we can
identify is a variety of roundworm which is found in raccoons.
The presence in humans seems to be mainly related to the
attempted domestication of raccoons. We do not expect a risk of
increased incidence of this disease with our wild raccoon
population.
Probably the most significant public health risk associated with
wildlife populations is vehicular accidents. White tail deer are
the only wildlife species that represent the potential for
serious damage /injury to a vehicle and its occupants.
Reported deer /auto accidents for the past few years are as
follows:
1984
17
1985
18
1986
12
1987
?
1988
5
1989
6
1990
10
For comparison purposes, the total number of all reported
vehicular accidents in Edina in 1990, was 1302. Therefore, the
chance of vehicular /deer collisions is remote and not a
significant danger to our residents.
Wildlife warning reflectors have been employed in certain areas
of the State which exhibit high incidence of deer /auto
collisions. To be effective, these reflectors must be closely
spaced and must be cleaned regularly. There is also some
evidence that the reflectors may lose effectiveness with time as
deer become accustomed to them.
Animal Control Services
Animal control efforts focus primarily on domestic animals. The
City, however, does provide some services relative to wild
animals. First, we provide an ombudsmen and referral service to
callers with wildlife related questions. Second, we assist in
the removal of certain wild animals, i.e. raccoons, from
resident's homes. Third, we remove and dispose of carcasses of
road kills from public property.
At the present time, we do not trap and remove "nuisance"
animals. Such animals include garbage can raiding raccoons,
chimney dwelling raccoons and squirrels, garden /flower /shrub
preying rabbits and woodchucks. with the exception of suspected
animal bites, we no longer lend live traps to residents for
trapping nuisance animals. This practice was stopped several
years ago in that staff spent a considerable amount of time
retrieving traps from residents and relocating captured animals.
In addition, finding suitable habitat for relocation has become
increasingly difficult. Live traps are now available for rental
from private services.
Several small businesses have been established in recent years
which will remove nuisance animals for residents. We routinely
refer residents to these businesses for the removal of those
animals described earlier. The results have been positive.
Goose Removal Project
Last summer the University of Minnesota completed the fourth
annual trapping and relocation of Canada geese in Edina. Two
years remain on our contract with the University. This program
has been successful in stabilizing goose populations in Edina.
The program is expensive - approximately $50 per captured goose.
We believe that the program must be continued indefinitely to
maintain stable populations.
Canada goose populations are particularly well suited to capture
and relocation programs -- they are gregarious, become flightless
and can be easily captured during the summer, and can be
transported with relatively low mortality to underpopulated parts
of the country. Unfortunately, very few species of wildlife
share these characteristics.
Population Control of White - Tailed Deer
The following findings are based upon our review of the Minnesota
River Valley Deer Management Task Force's "Final Report and
Recommendations" (Exhibit 4) and our interviews with Mr. Aanestad
and Mr. Parker.
Population control of deer can be accomplished only by killing
individual animals. For a variety of reasons, population control
cannot be accomplished by trapping and relocating animals in a
manner similar to our goose program.
Attempted population control in Edina alone would be of very
questionable value. Most of our deer population is part of a
larger herd located outside of the City, principally in Hyland
Park in Bloomington. Yet, portions of Edina provide suitable
habitat which will support a certain number of deer (i.e. the
carrying capacity). Therefore, individual animals killed in
Edina would likely be replaced by animals migrating from Hylands.
At the present time, neither Hennepin County Parks nor the City
of Bloomington is pursuing a population control program in
Hylands Park.
If a program were pursued in Hylands Park, the most feasible
methods of population reduction in Edina would be realized
through sharp - shooting by marksmen employed by the City or
another agency or by trapping and killing animals. The use of
marksmen would depart from a long standing City policy of not
granting permits for the discharge of firearms. The public
safety risks associated with such a program would require careful
study before implementation.
At the present time, the policy of the Minnesota Department of
Natural Resources is that deer population control is the
responsibility of the cities. Although the D.N.R. will provide
some technical services and must issue permits for certain
control measures, it will not coordinate or implement a deer
control program in Edina.
Artificial Feeding
Artificial feeding of wildlife is a somewhat controversial topic.
Our research suggests that artificial feeding is not necessary
for the welfare of any wildlife population in Edina. Conversely,
the prohibition of feeding will probably not result in the
reduction of any of our wildlife populations. In particular, it
is doubtful that the winter concentration of waterfowl at Point
of France would be reduced if feeding was prohibited. The
attraction at Point of France is open water which is a rare
commodity in winter. Food sources are not scarce for a free
flying waterfowl population and.the prohibition of feeding in
Edina probably would not reduce the attraction of Point of France
for water fowl.
Although feeding does not affect deer populations, it may result
in an increase in deer /human conflicts. For example, food plots
may cause deer to move across roadways with an increased
frequency and may attract deer to areas where they will damage
ornamental vegetation.
The City of Bloomington has enacted an ordinance prohibiting deer
- ---- f-eed-ng in certain area--of the City. Apparently - this- ordinance
is not being aggressively enforced but may discourage some
residents from feeding deer in areas impacted by deer predation
of shrubs and ornamentals.
Population Control of Raccoons
It may be possible to reduce temporarily the raccoon population
in certain areas of the City. Such a program would require an
aggressive trapping program. Like deer, the relocation of
animals is probably not feasible and therefore, trapped animals
would be destroyed. Similar programs have apparently been
attempted by some cities but were discontinued due to the high
cost of the program. In addition, long term population reduction
may be doubtful. The selective removal of nuisance animals is
the more common approach.
C_7
Beaver Control
The City continues to issue special permits for the removal of
beavers which are obstructing creeks and causing potential
flooding.
Conclusion and Recommendations
o We cannot document any significant public health and safety
reasons which justify the reduction of any wildlife
populations in Edina. The City should continue to monitor
new developments in public health research, especially Lyme
disease, to determine if certain control measures are
warranted in the future.
o Our Canada goose program has been successful in reducing the
nuisance aspect of this population. We recommend
continuation of the program.
o The problem associated with the white tailed deer population
in Edina is predation on shrubs and other ornamental plants.
Although this problem is not particularly wide spread, some
property owners have been hard hit. We recommend that the
D.N.R. be urged to produce educational materials as to the
use of repellents and other techniques for damage control.
Repellents are effective but require ongoing use throughout
the growing season.
o Some residents have suggested that they are intimidated or
feel endangered by the presence of deer. We do not believe
that this constitutes a reason for population control.
o Artificial feeding is not necessary for wildlife welfare and
may contribute to some of the problems associated with deer.
We are very concerned with our ability to enforce a
prohibition of artificial feeding throughout the City. We,
therefore, recommend an ordinance prohibiting feed on City
owned properties as a means of demonstrating our concern
with artificial feeding. We also recommend that "About
Town" provide information concerning the problems with
artificial feeding.
o Reducing Edina's deer population is dependent upon reducing
Bloomington's.deer population. We recommend that the
Council approach this issue cautiously. Deer control
measures in other cities have been very controversial and we
would expect a similar controversy here. We recommend that,
at the present time, discussions concerning a larger scale
deer control program should be pursued at the staff level.
0
Discussions involving Bloomington, Hennepin Parks and Eden
Prairie would be appropriate.
o We believe that our present service level relative to wild
animal problems is reasonable and responsive to our
residents' expectations. Private businesses now offer a
variety of services concerning nuisance animals. Additional
services offered by the City would necessitate an increase
in our staff complement.
o Reduction of the raccoon population in certain areas of
Edina may be possible. Prior to implementing such a
program, we recommend continuation of the present practice
of removing nuisance animals by private contractors.
Increased dissemination of public education materials would
also be appropriate prior to initiating a more aggressive
program.
o We recommend that the City investigate the feasibility of
installing wildlife reflectors in identified deer crossing
areas.
ORDS, tfoRSCS
SUBJECT: 411MA - dW7Pa[ CALLS,O[C 8� Meu No✓ 40
NO /MO
JAN.
FEB.
MAR.
APR.
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUG.
SEPT.
'OCT.
NOV.
DEC.
TOTAL
Dos5'
7q
g2
89
I09
123
123
132
q -7
10-7'
64
65
-71
1136,
A,1$ 2
'1
8
y
�s9'
00 3
0
--
c)
G.
G
2
2
l
1
76
6
.I
i 3�
Q3
9CO .
9G
12-
139
1qq
Is ►
116
125
82
72
10
7
15
3
S
RAaUW6
19
! 5
1 �)
33
15
I
26
30
35
I-
4
217
MER 7
21
2
Z
0
7
5
O
3
1
5
5
36
QumL8
q
I
10
3
(o
S
q
3
2
y
3
3
q
legulr 9
i
1
2
2
6
e
5
3
10
o
2
2
`IS
°
D
U
U
2Z-
2
G
3
Z
O
1
G
17
E"
2
0
2
11
15
Iq
0
S
O
U
Z
59,
w,Z,2
5
5
3
13
6
29
r
y
5
ro5
25
15
3q
sS
75
2Z
q5
47
S9
51
32
17
TOTAL
12Z
q
13 9
/93
2?-q
2-17 1
17,1
/9/ 1/19
/07
• 48
&7
'16°1
o`
7
2
)l %
,•
r�
x
H
bd
H
H
EXHIBIT 2
LYME DISEASE
Lyme disease is a disease caused by a bacteria which can be carried
by deer ticks. The disease is not usually fatal but can cause a
variety of symptoms including fever, chills, headache, dizziness,
muscle aches, joint pain and chronic fatigue. The disease also
affects the cardiac and nervous system and can lead to arthritic
conditions and /or heart arrythmia. Early diagnosis of the disease
aids in successful treatment using antibiotics.
.The deer tick is carried by .a large variety of warm blooded
animals. Not only white tail deer but also .mice, birds,
woodchucks, dogs, cattle, etc are hosts for the deer tick. It is
now believed that the adult deer tick will feed on a larger host
such as a dog before dropping off and laying eggs on the ground.
The nymph stage is believed to feed on smaller animals such as
rodents and birds. The nymph stage of the tick -is very small,
about the size of a pin head and is extremely difficult to detect..
It is believed that birds play a major role in dissemination of the
deer tick.
It would be impossible to eliminate the risk of contracting Lyme
disease by eliminating the animals which play a role in the life
cycle of the deer tick. In addition, the mere presence of deer
ticks in the environment does not mean the risk -for Lyme disease is
present. The tick must harbor the bacteria which cause Lyme
disease and not all ticks have the bacteria. Some areas of the
country have a very low incidence of the bacteria in the ticks,
less than 10 %, and other areas have as high as 90% of the ticks
positive for the bacteria.
People in Minnesota should be aware of the areas where deer tick
are present and of the potential for contracting Lyme disease when
visiting - those areas. Generally, those areas are northeastern
Minnesota, the St. Croix River Valley and southeastern Minnesota
along the Mississippi River. Surveillance for Deer Tick in the
Metropolitan Area is occurring through the Metropolitan Mosquito
Control District. It appears that the District will continue
their surveillance efforts in the future.
To this date the only area in Hennepin County where the deer tick
has been recovered is near. Coon, Rapids Dam. Northern Ramsey,
Northern Washington and Anoka County are other areas where the deer
tick have been 'found. Analysis will be performed to determine
whether these deer tick are carrying the bacteria responsible for
Lyme Disease.
The Public Health response to Lyme Disease is and will continue to
be, public awareness and early diagnosis of the disease. Any
attempt to eliminate the host animals such as mice, birds or deer
is not practical.
EXHIBIT 3'
RABIES
Rabies in humans in the United States is extremely rare with 0 -3•
cases per year reported since 1980. In animals, both wild and
domestic, about 4700 -7100 cases are reported each year in the
United States.
_, In Minnesota, 100 -200 cases of animal rabies have been reported
annually since 1985. The skunk is the predominant animal with
rabies in Minnesota, followed by cattle. There have only been two
reported rabid raccoons in Minnesota since 1985, one in 1986 and
one in 1989. The Minnesota Department of Health tests over 2000
animals per year for rabies.
A localized outbreak of rabies in racoons has been developing in
the mid atlantic region of the United States affecting
Pennsylvania, Delaware and Virginia. This outbreak is under
surveillance by the Center for Disease Control.
Anoka County is the only area in the Metropolitan Region which has
reported a rabid racoon. The existence of rabies in racoons in the
Metropolitan area is virtually non existent.
The risk for humans with respect to rabies is not from wild animals
but rather from domestic animals which have been in contact with
wild animals. Vaccine is available and in use for protecting
domestic animals from rabies. The vaccine is less effective for
non traditional pets such as skunks and raccoons. Keeping of these
animals is discouraged.
Most communities have pet licensing laws which require proof of
rabies vaccination as a condition for licensing pets. The
existence of vaccination requirements for domestic pets is an
important prevention tool in reducing human exposure to rabies.
MINNESOTA VALLEY
DEER MANAGEMENT TASK FORCE
FINAL REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
JUNE 1990
EXHIBIT 4
CONTENTS
I Section I.
PREAMBLE
1
Section II.
TASK FORCE OBJECTIVES
1
Section III.
TASK FORCE ORGANIZATION
1
Section IV.
DECISION - MAKING PROCESS
2
Section V.
STUDY AREA
2
Section VI.
i
ISSUES
2
Section VII.
RECOMMENDATIONS
3
Section VIII. IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS AND
AGREEMENTS
9
Section Ix
RATIFICATION
10
APPENDICES
11.
A. ORIGINAL PROPOSAL FOR A MINNESOTA VALLEY
DEER MANAGEMENT TASK FORCE
B. FRAMEWORK AND GROUNDRULES
C. MEETING SUMMARIES AND LIST OF HANDOUTS
DISTRIBUTED AT TASK FORCE MEETINGS
D. SHORT -TERM RECOMMENDATIONS
E. POSITION PAPER ON PUBLIC HUNTING
F. ALTERNATIVE DEER CONTROL PROGRAM
G. INFORMATION ON USE OF WILDLIFE
WARNING REFLECTORS
H. LIST OF CONTACTS FOR INFORMATION ON
DEER CONTROL METHODS
I. LIST OF TASK FORCE. ORGANIZATIONS
DEER MANAGEMENT TASK FORCE
FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
May 1990
SECTION I. PREAMBLE
This document contains the final report and recommendations of the special
Task Force established at the request of the Cities of Burnsville,
Bloomington, Eagan and Mendota Heights to examine issues regarding the
management of the white- tailed deer populations in these four cities, with
particular focus on the Minnesota River Valley. We, the Task Force
members, conducted a comprehensive analysis of urban deer management
issues in a series of 18 meetings and one field trip during the period from
April 1989 to May 1990. We represent a very wide diversity of opinions and
viewpoints on what we found to be complex and controversial issues. While
our diversity often led to profound disagreement on significant issues, we
believe that our efforts to reach agreement were sincere and that we have
accomplished what reasonably could be expected. While the study area was
narrowly defined, proceedings of the Task Force may assist other
communities in determining policies for similar areas.
SECTION II. TASK FORCE OBJECTIVES
The Task Force objectives, as proposed by the DNR, and approved by the four
cities, were: 1) identify the problems associated with deer populations in the
Valley, 2) review past and proposed deer management by wildlife agencies, 3)
review existing and potential deer population control methods and
recommend methods to be used in the Valley, 4) recommend desireable deer
population densities, and 5) recommend practical methods for implementing
a comprehensive deer management program in the lower Minnesota Valley.
(See Appendix A for additional information regarding Task Force formation.)
SECTION III. TASK FORCE ORGANIZATION
In order to promote constructive discussion of the issues, the Task Force
developed and adopted a Framework and Groundrules document. (See
Appendix B.) This document identified Task Force participants, working
relationships, media contacts, scope, objectives and schedule. The Task Force
membership was selected to.insure that the broadest possible range of
opinions on the issues would be represented. (See Appendix I.) It was not
the original intent of the Task Force to structure its membership to represent
opinions on the issues in proportion to opinions held by the general public,
and we make no express or implied claim to that effect.
- 1 -
The task force used the services of a neutral facilitator supplied from the staff
of the Department of Natural Resources to conduct the meetings, write
meeting summaries and provide written drafts of Task Force decisions.
Summaries of all Task Force meetings and a listing of supplemental
information distributed by Task Force members at those meetings are
included in Appendix C.
SECTION IV. DECISION -MAKING PROCESS
The Task Force adopted a consensus decision - making process. In this
context, consensus means unanimous consent. If even one member of the
Task Force could not agree to a proposal or recommendation, then the report
indicates that. the Task Force was unable to reach consensus on that item. In
such cases where it is relevant, the pros and cons of the issue are presented.
These should not be considered as majority /minority findings because the
Task Force did not determine them through a voting procedure nor attach
weight or value to them. It is important for the reader to understand the
reasons for the Task Force use of consensus decision - making. There are two
reasons why the Task Force did not use a vote or majority - minority decision
process. The first is that the Task Force was constituted as a fact - finding,
study group and not as a representative body whose votes would reflect the
will of the general public, such as a city council's would. The second is that
the Task Force, as a voluntary body, could not prevent the minority in any
voting situation from working outside the group to delay implementation of
or otherwise undermine any recommendations of the majority. In short, a
vote was seen as contributing to polarization and renewed conflict. The
disadvantage of the consensus method is that for some key issues there is no
recommendation. However, in those cases where the Task Force did reach
consensus, it represents a significant mandate for action, considering the
diversity of the membership.
SECTION V. STUDY AREA
The Task Force defined the geographic study limits as the area included
within the municipal boundaries of Bloomington, Burnsville, Eagan and
Mendota Heights. The implication of such a definition is that the
recommendations of the Task Force, unless expressly restricted, apply to deer
management activity within, but not beyond, this area.
For the most part, the Task Force focused on deer management activity on
the state and federal land in the lowest reach of the Minnesota River Valley
at the confluence with the Mississippi River. In setting the framework for its
deliberations, however, the Task Force decided to include areas outside of the
river valley itself because some of the issues are focused in these other areas.
SECTION VI. ISSUES
During the first and second meetings of the Task Force, members listed. their
concerns regarding the deer population within the study area. (See
-2-
Summary of 4/26/89 and 5/3/89 meetings in Appendix C.) These concerns
became the basis for the specific issues which the task force addressed. In
general these issues are: deer population objectives, deer population control
methods, deer /vehicle collisions, and deer impacts on vegetation.
SECTION VII. RECOMMENDATIONS
During a series of four meetings in April and May, 1989, the Task Force
developed a list of short -term recommendations to apply only to the deer
management activities which would occur in 1989 -1990. (See Appendix D.)
Those recommendations were transmitted to the four cities in June, 1989,
and were, for the most part, implemented.
In September, 1989, the Task Force reconvened and focused on issues related
to a more long -term program for deer management. The results of the fact -
finding and discussions conducted by the Task Force during the 9 -month
period since then are presented in this section. The recommendations are not
presented in order of priority.
A. Recommendations on Deer Population Densities
Deer population densities, usually expressed in number of deer per
square mile, are the main indicator used by resource managers to
describe the size of the deer population.
ISSUE
What should the deer population density objectives be for the
study area and how should they be determined?
RECOMMENDATIONS
1) The Task Force recognizes the expertise of the resource
management agencies to set numerical deer population density
objectives for units within the study area.
2) The Task Force recommends that the following factors be carefully
considered by those agencies in the development of those density
objectives:
a. deer vehicle collisions (because of data limitations should be
considered on an area -wide rather than site specific basis)
b. natural habitat browsing (considering abundance,
distribution and diversity of browse)
c. ornamental shrub, crop depredation (assessed in terms of
number of complaints)
d. deer health (reproductive rates are prime indicator)
e. natural population variability (consider long -range trends)
f. ecosystem management objectives (as determined by resource
management agencies)
g. consumptive and non - consumptive uses of deer by people
h. land use diversity
i. community tolerance levels
j. artificial feeding
k human:healtli (not a sigcant f idoiai''presen-t time)
-3-
1. accuracy and variability of deer census data
B. Deer Management Methods,
The Task Force generated a list of various methods used to manage
deer populations and behavior as follows:
Indirect Direct
Fences/movement barriers Fertility control
Repellants Trap and transfer
natural vegetation Trap and kill
chemical/non- chemical Hunting
reflectors Sharpshooting
noisemakers Reintroduce predators
visual
Habitat manipulation
Artificial feeding
No action
C. Recommendations-on Population Control Methods.
In determining which methods from the list generated in Item B. could
be used to control deer populations, the Task Force adopted a two -step
process. The first step was to develop a list of all methods which could
possibly have an effect on deer populations. The second step was to
evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of the methods on the list.
ISSUE
What methods are gQssible to achieve population density
reduction objectives within the study area?
The following list of os�, sible methods was identified:
No action
Reintroduction of predators
Habitat manipulation
Artificial feeding
Fertility control
Hunting
Controlled, limited deer kill program
Sharpshooting
Trap and kill
Trap and transfer
ISSUE
Based on the above list of os� sible methods, which methods are
effective and A a le and how should they be used?
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
No Action - this method involves letting "nature take its course"
and not intervening in deer populations.
Recommended Use: not very likely to be effective method
area -wide or long -term; may be suitable on short -term
basis and/or within certain units of study area.
-4-
Reintroduction of Predators - this method involves artificially
reintroducing natural deer predators such as wolves and coyotes
to the study area.
Recommended Use: not suitable; rationale: social
unacceptability, cost, insufficient habitat for predator
species.
Habitat manipulation - this method involves creating additional
habitat or enhancing existing habitat to increase biological
carrying capacity for deer.
Recommended Use: not suitable; opportunities for
significant habitat manipulation are limited; however,
municipalities should encourage preservation of natural
deer movement corridors and community open space in
order to protect critical deer habitat and reduce the need
for population control as much as possible.
Artificial Feeding - this method involves the use of food
supplements or planting food crops on public lands to increase
biological carrying capacity.
Recommended Use: not effective for population control;
may be suitable in limited situations to affect deer
movement and distribution. (See item F in this section
for additional information.)
Fertility Control - this method "involves the use of chemical
agents administered to deer to reduce or prevent fertility.
Recommended Use: This method cannot be implemented
at this time because there is no drug currently approved
for use on free - ranging deer. The state and federal
agencies should monitor developments in this field for
possible implementation of this method in the long term.
Hunting - this method involves the use of private citizens who
apply for and are given permission to hunt deer according to
state regulations on public lands within the study area.
Recommended Use: the Task Force was unable to reach
consensus on whether public hunting should or should not
be used to achieve deer population control objectives
within the study area. A thorough discussion of the Task
Force deliberations. on this issue is included in a Position
Paver attached as Appendix E.
Alternative Deer Control Program - this method was developed
by the Task Force as a three -year experimental alternative to
public recreational hunting on the state park and federal refuge
within the study area. In general, it requires the DNR and
USFWS to select, based on defined criteria, a limited number of
private citizens who would then be instructed to kill deer in
these areas, using prescribed methods, in order to help meet
deer population control objectives.
Recommended Use: Approved for use on state and federal
public lands within the study area according to the details
as developed by the Task Force in Appendix F. The Task
-5-
Force will have on -going review responsibilities. (See also
Implementation Recommendations A and B in Section
VIII.)
Sharpshooting - this method involves the shooting o methods
approved law enforcement officers using appropriate
which are not legal for those participating in either public
hunting or the alternative deer control program. The purpose of
this method is to help maximize the reduction of the deer
population in effective, humane and safe manner.
Recommended use: to be used as appropriate to
conditions including: location, population reduction
needs, availability of personnel, and public safety.
Trap and Kill - this method involves live- trapping deer and
then killing them. It is generally considered to be a high -cost
alternative to sharpshooting or hunting in areas where human
safety considerations would preclude the use of sharpshooting or
hunting and a relatively few deer need to be removed.
Recommended Use: to be used on a case -by -case basis in
the most humane way, according to DNR regualtions,
only when the DNR has established that there has been a
documented problem, after all appropriate non- lethal
methods, have been exhausted, and on small parcels of
public or private land.
Trap and Transfer - this method involves live- trapping of deer
and then transporting and releasing them in locations with
suitable habitat and carrying capacity.
Recommended Use: not suitable on a large -scale basis,
may be suitable in limited special circumstances; very
stressful to deer, not cost effective in most cases, limited
areas for releasing deer.
D. Recommendations on Deer/Vehicle Collisions,
ISSUE
What methods should be implemented, and by whom, to reduce
the incidence of deer /vehicle collisions within the study area?
RECOMMENDATIONS
Local units of government should implement the following:
1) Increase compliance with the DNR Car -Kill Survey and/or Salvage
Reports, if not currently participating in these programs.
2) Consult local law enforcement people to have them identify specific
locations with a high frequency of deer /vehicle collisions.
3) Install the following at high frequency collision locations:
a. Wildlife warning reflectors - a study in Minnesota indicates
80 -90% reduction in deer /vehicle collisions using this method.
(See Appendix G.)
b. Informational (caution) and reduced speed zone signs -
consideration should be given to highlighting signs during
periods when seasonal deer movement activity is highest (times
available from DNR).
4) Issue press releases in local media (e.g. local cable TV, local
newspapers, radio) during seasons with increased deer movement
indicating most hazardous locations, any special reduced speed zones
in effect, general information about driving methods when deer are
encountered on roads.
5) Cut overhanging or obscuring foliage back from road shoulders at
high frequency collision locations to improve drivers' view of road
shoulder and ditch area.
6) Discourage citizens from providing food for deer in proximity to high
frequency collision areas.
7)'Consult with or refer inquiries for information to DNR Area Wildlife
Office, Shakopee, Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge
Headquarters, Bloomington, and Office of Traffic Engineering,
Minnesota Department of Transportation. (See Appendix H.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION - RELATED TO THIS ISSUE:
The official records on deer /vehicle collisions in the study area are
imprecise. Records of animal/vehicle collisions kept by Mn/DOT do not
distinguish between the type of animals which are struck. Where
available, the DNR uses deer /vehicle accident information as an input
element to deer population prediction models. Following a law change
in 1988, the responsibility for recording and removing deer killed by
vehicles has been transferred from the DNR to public road
maintenance authorities. In order to provide continuing information
about the deer population from this source, the DNR has requested
public road maintenance authorities to complete what are known as
salvage reports for all deer carcasses recovered.
E. Recommendations on Damage to Vegetation.
ISSUE
What methods should be implemented, and by whom, to reduce
the incidence of deer damage to ornamental shrubbery,
landscape nursery stock, and commercial crops within the study
area?
RECOMMENDATIONS
1) Local units of government should refer people who express problems
with deer damaging their vegetation to the currently available
information pamphlets, videos,and demonstration projects on control
methods. Excellent information on the most effective methods, in
particular fencing and repellants, is available from the DNR Area
Wildlife Office in Shakopee, the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife
Refuge Headquarters in'Bloomington, the Minnesota Extension
Service "Dial U" service, and the University of Minnesota Landscape
Arboretum in Chanhassen. (See Appendix H for list of contacts for
information.)
-7-
2) Local units of government should discourage deer feeding by persons
who are experiencing vegetation damage from deer.
3) At seasonally appropriate times, local units of government and state
and federal wildlife management agencies should sponsor public
information sessions and issue news releases regarding effective
methods available for reducing deer damage to vegetation.
F. Discussion of general recommendation regarding artificial deer
f n
Recommendations on deer feeding specific to other issues addressed by
the Task Force are indicated above (e.g. see recommendation on
vegetation damage). The principal findings from the discussion were
that: an ordinance prohibiting artificial deer feeding would be
unenforceable (Boulder, Colorado example); artificial feeding could
either reduce or increase deer damage to ornamental shrubbery
depending on the amount and location of feed provided; artificial
feeding could lead to increased movement of deer across roads,
depending again on location; and food plots for deer on. public land in
Ft. Snelling State Park or the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife
Refuge would conflict with the management goals of these units, would
generally reduce available habitat for wildlife, and at best would
provide food for only the early portion of the critical winter feeding
period. In discussing this issue the Task Force also recognized the
difference between baiting deer with feed to increase their visibility in
conjunction. with public park interpretive programs and providing food
to meet all or a portion of deer nutritional requirements.
ME
SECTION VIII. IMPLEMEENTATION TSCOMMENDATIONS AND
AGREEME
The following recommendalis
implementation of the recommendations ted in Section VII above.
A. The DNR will request from the four cities a three -year variance from
the ordinances which prohibit firearms discharge in order to
implement the alternative deer control program on a three -year
experimental basis. DNR and USFWSin of this consultation t the Task
determined by the
Force.
B. In April of each year beginning in 1991, the DNR will convene the
Task Force for the purpose of reviewing and discussing d ogress
made in meeting Task Force recommendations, the proposed
matters a the
management objectives for the coming y an
group may decide.
C. Individual members of the Task Force agree to support and encourage
others to support the adoption and implementation of the Task Force
Report and Recommendations by the city councils.
SECTION DL RATIFICATION
members and alternates of the Deer Management Task
We, the undersigned
Force, do hereby ratify the foregoing report and recommendations as
representing our best effort to address the issues which led to our formation.
l`Itc (�
'1Z
vim+
' �rTSnellr'n T4- rK
w�ce. JV�w D
ge— '
- N�'TN%dRK f f0� Hi✓irlsL� GcaA�C��%`� <M�NNf?G)
i
y
( /yi ►�tiP� �}tc� �. r cent. I L� r �C��i ><t
U "Ile /�'/1-
lz n! ?T >. l✓, �� is �� �, y ��
-10-
r�
c*
op1nsA.
O
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: KENNETH ROSLAND
Agenda Item # -1-Y •
E
From: CRAIG LARSEN
Consent
C
Information Only
x
Date: FEBRUARY 4, 1991
Mgr . Recommends
1-1
To HRA
Subject: 1990 CENSUS
[Z I
To Council
POPULATION COUNTS
Action
n
Motion
C
Resolution i
!
r
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Info /Background
Attached are the 1990 census population counts which we have
received for both Hennepin County and the City of Edina.
When comparing the 1980 figures with the most recent counts, it
appears that the Edina population has remained stable while
Hennepin County has experienced a 9.7% increase.
1980
Edina 46,073
Henn. Co. 941,411
1990 Change
46,070 .0%
1,032,431 +9.7%
The preliminary population count we had received from the Census
Bureau last fall was 46,012. The most recent figure, 46,070 is a
result of the past census local review the City submitted to
challenge the preliminary count.
a
As more detailed information is received from the Census Bureau, we
will forward that data on to you.
i
FORM: 0-69 MINNESOTA Bureau of the Census
PAGE 71 OF 93 1990 Population Totals Department of Commerce
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IThis table provides 1990 census population counts for states and governmental)
(units. Since these counts provide only totals for the states and local)
Igovernmental units, they are not suitable for redistricting. As required bY!
(Public. Law 94 -171, the Bureau of the Census will provide redistricting countsi
Iat the block level for all states and the District of Columbia. The countsi
(will be released on,a state -by -state basis beginning in early 1991 and ending;
Iby April 1, 1991.
I
IThe population counts set forth herein are subject to possible correction for;
(undercount or overcount. The United States Department of Commerce is
1considering whether to correc -t these counts and will publish corrected
Icounts, if any, not later than July 15, 1991.
------------------------------=---------------------------------- - - - - -- (011091'
G 0 V-. E R N M E �N, T A L U N I T ----- - - - - --
------ - - - - -- -------------------------------------------- - - - - -- !Number of
I CODE I I NAME I I Persons
------ - - - - -- ----------------------------------------------- - - - - -- ----- - - - - --
PL
27
1015
Donaldson city -------------------------------- - - - - --
.5.7
PL
27
1020
Donnelly city --a.a. as =ss=a=ss=ssassas=s=sss=-- aaaaaa
221
PL
27
1025
Doran city ------------------------------------ - - - - --
',E
PL
27
1030
Dover city =---------- ---- ---- --- -- ---- ---- ---- - - -- --
416
PL
27
1035•
Dovray city ----------------------------------- - - - - --
6C
PL
27
1040
Duluth city ----------------------------------- - - - - --
85,493
PL
27
1045
Dumont city •-___-_•-_ _________••_______ ____ ___ _ _ ____
12E
PL
27
1050
Dundas city ----------------------------------- - - - - --
473
PL
27
1055
Dundee city sass= aassasasasasaa :aaaaassaaasaaasaaaaas
107
PL
27
1060
Dunnell city'---------------------------------- - - - - --
187
PL
27
1063
Eagan city ---------------------------------=-- - - - - --
47,409
PL
27
1065
Eagle Bend city =___-- •_____ ____ ___ __ ______ ____ _ _ _ ___
524
PL
27
1070
Eagle Lake city ------------------------------- - - - - --
1,703
PL
27
1072
East Bethel city =__-= = = =a =--- =____-- _- •- _- •_- __ -_ - --
81050
PL
27
1075
East Grand Forks city ------------------------- - - - - --
8,658
PL
27
1080
East Gull Lake city --------------------------- - - - - --
687
PL
27
1085
Easton city
229
PL
27
1090
Echo city ------------------------------------- - - - - --
304
PL
27
1094
Eden Prairie city _____ __ __ _____ __ _•____-- •--- _ - - - - --
39,311
-PL
27
1095
Eden Valley city ------------------------------ - - - - --
732
PL
27
1100
Edgerton city --------------------------------- - - - - --
1;106
PL
27
1105
Edina city
46,070
PL
27
1110
Effie city ------------------------------------ - - - - --
130
PL
27
1115
Eitzen city =____-_-_- _•-- -- ----- -- -- -- ----- --- ----•_
221
PL
27
1120
Elba city ------------------------------------- - - - - --
220
PL
27
1125
Elbow Lake city ------------------------------- - - - - --
1,186
PL
27
1130
Elgin city =___•_________ ________ __ ____ ____ ____ • -• -_ -.
733
PL
27
1135
Elizabeth city -------------------------------- - - - - --
152
PL
27
1140
Elko city
223
PL
27
1145
Elk River city -------------------------------- - - - - --
11,143
FORM:
D -69
MINNESOTA Bureau of the Census
PAGE 20 OF 93
1990 Population Totals Department;
of Commerce
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IThis
table provides
1990 census population counts for states and governmentall
(units.
Since
these counts provide only, totals for the states
and locall
(governmental
units, they are not suitable for redistricting. As
required byl
)Public Law 94
-171, the Bureau of the Census will provide redistricting
countsl
lat
the block
level for all states and the District of Columbia.
The counts)
twill
be released
on a state -by -state basis beginning in early 1991
and endingl
1 by
April 1,1991.
I .
I
IThe
population
count's set forth herein are subject to possible correction
l
forl
)undercount
or overcount. The United States Department of
Commerce isl
)considering
whether to correct these counts and will publish
corrected)
)counts,
if any,
not later than July 15, 1991.
1
-----------------------------------------------------------------
- -
- - -- (011091)
G 0
V.
E R N M
E N T A L U N I T
----- - - - - --
------
- - - - --
-----------------------=------------------ - - - - --
)Number ofl
I
------
CODE I
- - - - --
I NAME I
----------------------------------------------- - - - - --
I Persons i
----- - - - - --
MC
27
051100
Roseville township ---------------------------- - - - - --
162
MC
27
051105
Sanford township
169
MC
27
051110
Stony Brook township -------------------------- - - - - --
151
CO
27
053
Hennepin County =__=== = =as= aaaaa :aaaaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaa
1,032,431
MC
27
053090
Hassan township -------------------------------------
1,951
CO
27
055
Houston County -------------------------------- - - - - --
18,497
MC
27
055005
Black Hammer township =-------- ------- ----- ----- - ----
318
MC
27
055010
------------------------- - - - - --
Brownsville township ---------------------------------
408
MC
27
055015
Caledonia township = as sasaaasaasassaassssaasaaasasaaa
529
MC
27
055025
Crooked Creek township ------------------------ - - - - --
310
MC
27
055035
Hokah township -------------------------------- - - - - --
551
MC
27
055040
Houston township ______ ________ ________ __ _______ ____=
423
MC
27
055050
Jefferson township ---------------------------- - - - - --
136
MC
27
055055
La Crescent township = sasassasaaaasasaaaasaaasssaaaaa
1,427
MC
27
055065
Mayville township ----------------------------- - - - - --
436
MC
27
055070
Money Creek township -------------------------- - - - - --
429
MC
27
055075
Mound Prairie township _ ___ _______________ _____ ______
581
MC
27
055080
Sheldon township ------------------------------ - - - - --
276
MC
27
055085
Spring Grove township = assasaaaaaaasssasassssasasassa
567
MC
27
055095
Union township -------------------------------- - - - - --
334
MC
27
055100
Wilmington township --------------------------- - - - - --
520
MC
27
055105
Winnebago township aaaaaaaa =aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.aa.a
271
MC
27
055110
Yucatan township ------------------------------ - - - - --
335
CO
27
057
Hubbard County -s sans= asaaaaaasasssaasssaassaasasaaaa
14,939
MC
27
057005
Akeley township ------------------------------- - - - - --
332
MC
27
057015
Arago township --------------------------------- - - - - -"
485
MC
27
057020
Badoura township = -----
87
MC
27
057023
Clay township --------------------------------- - - - - --
58
MC
27
057025
Clover township aas ss aaaaa sa- asaaaassassssasaasaasaaa
101
MC
27
057030
Crow wing Lake township ----------------------- - - - - --
187
VJ
�° REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item #
Iv-11-
From:
GORDON L. HUGHES
Consent
Information Only
Date:
FEBRUARY 4, 1991
Mgr. Recommends
To HRA
Subject:
CONFIRMATION OF
a
To Council
STRATEGIC PLANNING
MEETING DATE -
Action
❑
Motion
MARCH 9, 1991
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
0
Discussion
Recommendation:
Info /Background:
Traditionally, the Council and Staff have conducted the annual
Strategic Planning Retreat on the second Saturday in March. If
you wish to follow this practice, the date for this year's
retreat would be March 9, 1991. The retreat generally begins at
8:00 A.M. and adjourns at noon.
o e
p
ades
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: KENNETH ROSLAND
From: DAVID A. VELDE
Date: FEBRUARY 4, 1991
Subject: 1991 Public Health
Nursing Services
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
Iv.
I
Consent
0
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
FT
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Staff recommends entering into a contract with the Bloomington
Division of Public Health for the provision of Public Health
Nursing Services for calendar year 1991. The contract cost will be
$125,397.00.
Info /Background:
The 1991 Public Health Nursing contract is $13,508.00 higher than
1990. This increase is due to an increase.in utilization of Home
Health services and Health Promotion services. These services are
delivered to older residents, an age group which continues to grow
in Edina. Approximately 22% of Edina residents are over 60 and
about 16% of Edina residents are over 65 years of age. Also, it
should be noted that this contract is $7,914.00 over the 1991
budget for public health nursing services.
It should be noted that the projected cost for the public health
nursing services is based upon 1990 utilization data. This data
shows an increase of 479 home visits during the first nine months
of 1990. This level of increased activity accounts for most of the
increased contract cost.
The projection for the total cost of public health nursing services
delivered to Edina for 1991 is $239,915.00. The contract with
Bloomington will provide $125,397.00 to support non reimbursible
services to Edina residents and the remaining $114,518.00 will be
fees, grants, and third party payers such as Medicare, Medicaid,
and insurance.
This table shows the distribution of costs for public health
nursing services for the cities served by Bloomington:
Local Support
Reimbursements
Bloomington
814,422.00
317,699.00
Edina
125,397.00
114,518.00
Total Cost 1,132,121.00 239,915.00
Richfield
124,012.00
86,582.00
210,594.00
Fairview Southdale Hospital was contacted about providing these
services in Edina and program data was provided to the Hospital in
July 1990. The hospital remains interested in becoming involved in
community health services, but was unable to submit a proposal to
Edina for 1991. Discussions will continue with Fairview Southdale
Hospital to determine what role they may serve in the delivery of
these services in the future.
/1NA, mil\
Cn
p
\H�RPORN•�9�
�aee
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Ken R o s l a n d
Agenda Item #im—
J
From: Janet Chandler
Consent
Information Only
❑
Date: February 4, 1991
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject: Apartment Recycling
0
To Council
Action
Motion
•
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Acknowledge receipt of report.
Info /Background:
Edina ordinances require that, as of January 1, 1991, apartments and
condominiums must have recycling programs for their residents. Garbage
haulers also must offer recycling service to their customers and provide
the City with recycling tonnage reports on a quarterly basis.
All apartments and condominiums have now reported that their recycling
programs are set up. Further details are given in the report.
-over-
NOTIFICATION AND REPORTS -- BUILDING MANAGERS AND OWNERS
In September, a letter was sent to all apartment owners, condominium
associations and /or building managers informing them of the ordinance
requirements. A report form was included, to be returned to City Hall when
recycling arrangements were completed. As these reports were received, the
information was verified by checking with the haulers.
STATISTICS
The reports yielded the following information:
Number of apartment complexes ... 61 units...4042
Number of condominiums .......... 30 units ... 3330
Total ....... 91 Total..7372
(Note: buildings with 8 units or less have been included in the weekly
recycling service provided by the City.)
Of the current thirteen Edina trash haulers, nine are providing recycling
service for these buildings, including one recycling -only hauler.
START -UP DELAYS
Many building managers and haulers rushed to set up programs in December,
resulting in a crunch of activity. Containers could not be supplied fast
enough for all to be in place by January 1.
In some cases, it was difficult to locate building owners or managers,
causing delays in notification.
Since nearly everyone, once notified, seemed to be making an honest effort
to comply, no attempt was made to cite owners for non - compliance during
January.
PROGRAM RESULTS
It's too soon to have any tonnage information. The first quarterly reports
from haulers are not due until April. Early information from a few haulers
and managers indicates that programs have started fairly smoothly.
n
RESIDENT COMMENTS
Some apartment residents have called with questions on sorting or
preparation of recyclables. Since programs vary from building to building,
these questions are referred to the building managers.
One person called to inquire if she really was required by ordinance to
participate. All other apartment residents who called seemed very pleased
to have recycling programs in their buildings.
FUTURE REPORTS
Plans are to report to Council at mid -year with information gathered from
building owners, managers and haulers.
i
'r
r
�N�"I BPBBwt�
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
From: JOHN WALLIN 4 w
FINAiNCE DIRECTOR
Date: FEBRUARY 1, 1991
Subject: ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITIES
IN LIEU OF BOND
Recommendation:
Agenda Item -Y--A. 1 &. 2
Consent 0
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends 0 To HRA
❑ To Council
Action ❑ Motion
Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Approve the assignments of securities as good and sufficent collateral
of public funds made by the City's depositories First Bank Edina and
Marquette Bank Minneapolis.
Info /Background
According to State Statute, every depository must provide collateral or
other security to the City to protect it against financial loss because
of the depository's failure or mismanagement. The assignment authorizes
the City to sell all or as much of the collateral as is needed to reimburse
it for any amount lost through default of the institution.
Copies of the resolutions are attached.
RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITIES
IN LIEU OF BOND - FIRST BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina,- Minnesota approves the
assignment by its depository, First Bank National Association, of the following
securities, as good and sufficient collateral for the City of Edina Public Funds
deposited in said depository:
Description
Rate
Due
Par Value
U S Treasury Notes 7.25 Notes G -93
7.250
7/15/93
$3,460,000.00
U S Treasury Notes 7 7/8 Note M 92
7.875
3/31/92
300,000.00
$3,760,000.00
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,, do
hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the
Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 4, 1991, and as recorded in
the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 5th day of January, 1991.
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
ff
r.
RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITIES
IN,LIEU OF BOND - MARQUETTE BANK MINNEAPOLIS
BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota approves the
assignment by its depository, Marquette Bank Minneapolis, of the following
securities, as good and sufficient collateral for the City of Edina Public Funds
deposited in said depository:
Description
U S Treasury Notes T92
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ") SS
Rate Due Par Value
7.875 08/15/92 $500,000.00
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk.for the City of Edina, do
hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the
Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 4, 1991, and as recorded in
the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 5th day of January, 1991.
c
Marcella M. Daehn.
City Clerk
02 -04 -91 PAGE
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 2010 - 000 -00 1006 2617
30- 2010 - 000 -00 1031 2267
10- 2010 - 000 -00
10- 4504 - 510 -51 10515
50- 2010 - 000 -00
50- 2010- 000 -00
50- 2010 - 000 -00
10- 2010 - 000 -00
30- 4202 - 781 -78
50- 4248 - 841 -84 1000
30- 4262 - 782 -78 835975 2682
30- 4540 - 782 -78 6771 2848
10- 4504 - 621 -62
10- 4204 - 600 -60
10- 4504 - 648 -64 9775 2807
60- 1300 - 021 -20
10- 4202 - 640 -64 2809
10- 4202 - .640 -64 2885
10- 4202 - 640 -64 2812
30- 4262 - 782 -78 36021 2774
26- 4202 - 681 -68
50- 4514- 822 -82 1311 2684
1
1991 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
035701
01/24/91
1,250.00
ATHLETIC -TECH CORP
COMPUTER SOFTWARE
1,250.00 *
035702
01/24/91
690.50
MN SOIL & PEAT
POTTING SOIL
690.50 *
035703
01/24/91
2,690.00
BEST COPY
BUSINESS CARDS
035703
01/24/91
20.00
BEST COPY
BUSINESS CARDS
2,710.00
035704
01/24/91
246.00
FLAHERTYS HAPPY TYME
MIX
035704
01/24/91
383.60
FLAHERTYS HAPPY TYME
MIX
035704
01/24/91
195.60
FLAHERTYS HAPPY TYME
MIX
825.20
035705
01/24/91
22.00
CAROL SHAPIRO
REFUND
22.00
035706
01/24/91
40.20
RHONDA ROSE
REIMBURSEMENT
40.20
035707
01/24/91
210.00
TOM WASSMUND
SNOW PLOW CONTRACT
210.00 *.
035708
01/24/91
32.80
TODD UNIFORMS INC
UNIFORMS
32.80 *
035709
01/24/91
472.36
VALLEY VIEW ASSOC
REPAIR PARTS
472.36 *
035710
01/24/91
179.80
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSN
REIMBURSEMENT
179.80
035711
01/24/91
47.25
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSN
REIMBURSEMENT
47.25
035712
01/24/91
119.70
OSWALD FIRE HOSE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
119.70 *
035713
01/24/91
1,550.00
ENGCO CONSTR CO
CONSTRUCTION
1,550.00 *
035714
01/24/91
35.00
MN PIE
SCHOOL
35.00.E
035715
01/25/91
30.00
EDS /REGISTRAR
WEED SCHOOL
035715
01/24/91
30.00
EDS /REGISTRAR
SCHOOL
60.00 *
035716
01/24/91
22.75
SPRUCE COMPANY
LAUNDRY
22.75 *
035717
01/24/91
54.95
PHONOGETIC PRODUCTN
MGMT TAPES
54.95
035718
01/24/91
15.73
BANK SYSTEMS
SUPPLIES
02 -04 -91 PAGE
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 2010 - 000 -00 1006 2617
30- 2010 - 000 -00 1031 2267
10- 2010 - 000 -00
10- 4504 - 510 -51 10515
50- 2010 - 000 -00
50- 2010- 000 -00
50- 2010 - 000 -00
10- 2010 - 000 -00
30- 4202 - 781 -78
50- 4248 - 841 -84 1000
30- 4262 - 782 -78 835975 2682
30- 4540 - 782 -78 6771 2848
10- 4504 - 621 -62
10- 4204 - 600 -60
10- 4504 - 648 -64 9775 2807
60- 1300 - 021 -20
10- 4202 - 640 -64 2809
10- 4202 - .640 -64 2885
10- 4202 - 640 -64 2812
30- 4262 - 782 -78 36021 2774
26- 4202 - 681 -68
50- 4514- 822 -82 1311 2684
1
1991 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
02 -04 -91 PAGE
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O.
# MESSAGE
035718
01/24/91
153.73-
BANK SYSTEMS
SUPPLIES
50- 4514 - 822 -82
1311
2684
035718
01/24/91
153.73
BANK SYSTEMS
SUPPLIES
50- 4514 - 822 -82
1311
2684
035718
01/24/91
31.45
BANK SYSTEMS
SUPPLIES
50- 4514 - 842-84
1311
2684
035718
01/24/91
31.45
BANK SYSTEMS
SUPPLIES
50- 4514- 862 -86
1311
2684
78.63 *
035719
01/24/91
90.00
TELEDYNE TOTAL POWER
REPAIR WORK
10- 4540 - 560 -56
327379
2451
90.00 *
035720
01/24/91
375.00
NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGN
STOP SIGNS
10- 4542 - 325 -30
32714
2113
035720
01/24/91
375.00
NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGN
STOP SIGN
10- 4542 - 325 -30
32713
2112
750.00 *
035721
01/24/91
51.08
ASSOC HANDLING INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504- 783 -78
8141
1363
51.08 *
035722
01/24/91
469.69
NEENAH FOUNDRY CO
CATCH BASIN
41- 4552 - 900 -90
23494
2784'
469.69 *
035723
01/24/91
2,400.00
VEAP
HUMAN SERVICES
10- 4201- 504 -50
2,400.00 *
035724
01/25/91
15.00
MN GFOA
MEMBERSHIP
10- 4204 - 160 -16
035724
01/24/91
15.00
MN.GFOA
DUES
10- 4204 - 160 -16
30.00 *
035725
01/24/91
4,000.00
CORNERSTONE ADVOCACY
HUMAN SERVICE
10- 4201 - 504 -50
4,000.00 *
035726
01/24/91
50.00
RICK CARLSSON
SERVICES
30- 4224 - 781 -78
50.00 *
035727
01/24/91
859.33
PAT GREER
SERVICES
30- 4201 - 781 -78
859.33 *
035728
01/24/91
100.00
RICK NAGLER
PERFORMANCE 1/17/91
30- 4224 - 781 -78
100.00 *
035729
01/24/91
45.00
TRI COUNTY LAW
DUES
10- 4204 - 420 -42
45.00 *
035730
01/24/91
20.00
ASSN OF MN
DUES
10- 4204 - 460 -46
20.00 *
035731
01/24/91
113.22
AT &T
PHONE
23- 4256 - 611 -61
113.22 *
035732
01/24/91.
20.00
CAROL FOURRE
REFUND
30- 3505 - 000 -00
20.00 *
035733
01/24/91
37.96
BUREAU OF
TRAINING MATERIALS
10- 4504 - 520 -52
37.96 *
035734
01/24/91
425.00
SHADAWN FENCE CO
HOCKEY GOALS
10- 4504 - 648 -64
2806
425.00 *
2
1991 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
035735
01/24/91
31.00
PAUL KRESSER
CLASS CANCELED
31.00
*
035736
01/24/91
28.00
KRISTEN LOYE
CLASS CANCELED
28.00
*
035737
01/24/91
32.00
JERRY DOMBROWSKI
CLASS CANCELED
32.00
*
035738
01/24/91
19.00
ANDREA MEDCALF
CLASS CANCELED
19.00
*
035739
01/24/91
150.00
MANFRED GOODMAN
CLASS CANCELED
150.00
*
035740
01/24/91
32.00
BERNADETTE JOHNSON
CLASS REFUND
32.00
*
035741
01/24/91
308.25
PARK VACUUM CENTER
VACUUM
308.25
*
035742
01/24/91
959.75
LMCIT
SERVICES
959.75
*
035743
01/24/91
105.00
BLOOMINGTON HEATING
FURNACE REPAIR
105.00
*
035744
01/24/91
1,900.00
LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERV
HUMAN SERVICES
1,900.00
*
035745
01/28/91
450.00
STRATEGIC AD INC
ADVERTISING
450.00
*
035746
01/28/91
14.52
WILLIAM KREBS
REFUND
14.52
*
035747
01/25/91
23.52
LJ RUBBER STAMP
STAMPS
23.52
*
035748
01/25/91
75.95
JACK MCCLARD /ASSO
SERVICE WORK
75.95
*
035749
01/25/91
92.10
NORTHWESTERN SERV
REPAIRS
92.10
035750
01/28/91
77.45
BUDGET LIGHTING
REPAIR PARTS
77.45
035751
01/25/91
148.14
PARSONS ELECT CO
REPAIR WORK
148.14
035752
01/25/91
298.50
NAME BRAND SPORTS
JACKETS
298.50
035753
01/28/91
395.00
LANO EQUIP
EQUIP RENTAL
02 -04 -91 PAGE
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
23- 3500 - 000 -00
23- 3500 - 000 -00
23- 3500 - 000 -00
23- 3500 - 000 -00
23- 3500 - 000 -00
23- 3500 - 000 -00
27- 4504 - 667 -66 1892 2553
10- 4201 - 600 -60 304485
27- 4248 - 667 -66 1892 2903
10- 4201- 504 -50
27- 2010 - 000 -00 194207 2902
40- 2010 - 000 -00
10- 4516 - 440 -44 40497 2520
10- 4504 - 560 -56 65309 2585
28- 4248 - 702 -70 24103 2466
28- 2010 - 000 -00 19830 2766
10- 4540 - 540 -54 109775 2142
10- 4504 - 622 -62 631119
10- 2010 - 000 -00 3684 2669
3
1991 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
035754
035755
035756
035757
035758
035759
035760
035760
035760
035761
035762
035763
035764
035765
035766
035767
035768
035769
035770
035771
01/25/91
01/25/91
01/28/91
01/25/91
01/25/91
01/25/91
01/25/91
01/25/91
01/25/91
01/25/91
01/25/91
01/25/91
01/25/91
01/25/91
01/28/91
01/28/91
01/28/91
01/28/91
01/28/91
01/28/91
AMOUNT
395.00
31.78
31.78 *
14.40
14.40 *
12.00
12.00 *
950.00
950.00 *
676.00
676.00 *
137.98
137.98 *
600.00
600.00
600.00-
600.00 *
63.77
63.77 *
100.00
100.00 *
200.00
200.00 *
460.62
460.62 *
31.13
31.13 *
611.20
611.20 *
1,189.50
1,189.50
31.99
31.99
6.05
6.05
315.00
315.00
150.00
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
VAN- O -LITE INC
NATL CUSTOM ENTERP
ARTISTIC FLOORS
TYPE MASTER GRAPHIC
HOFFERS INC
AT &T
ESPECIALLY FOR
ESPECIALLY FOR
ESPECIALLY FOR
SIEGEL DISPLAY PROD
SHOW UP
CASAA
LUNDS
DORIE BARMAN
MPLS HEALTH DEPT
LIZ GEREBI
JAY BRASK
BUREAU OF BUSINESS
RAMSEY CO PTAC
JEFF FREDERICK
BULBS
BATTERY
CARPET METAL
PRINTING
WINDOW REPLACE
REPAIRS
RENTAL
RETAL
RETAL
OFFICE SUPPLIES
ADVERTISING
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SNOE REMOVAL
CULTURAL EXPO
PRO SERVICES
SERVICES
UNIFROM ALLOWANCE
DUES
SCHOOL
TRAINING
02 -04 -91 PAGE 4
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4540 - 560 -56 15211 2337
40- 4540- 801 -80 14672 1480
10- 2010 - 000 -00 7475 2356
30- 4600 - 781 -78 5925 2260
11- 4201 - 127 -12
28- 4248 - 702 -70
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
27- 4516 - 667 -66 45792 2459
27- 4214 - 667 -66 12336 2933
27- 4504 - 667 -66 2528 2626
50- 4201 - 821 -82 11277
10- 4280 - 504 -50
10- 2010 - 000 -00 6982
30- 3505 - 000 -00
10- 4266 - 420 -42
10- 4204 - 420 -42
10- 4202 - 420 -42
10- 4202 - 420 -42
1991 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
035772
035773
035774
035775
* * * * **
035777
035778
035778
035779
035779
035780
035781
035782
035783
035784
035785
035786
035787
035788
* * * * **
01/28/91
01/28/91
01/29/91
01/28/91
AMOUNT
150.00 *
55.00
55.00 *
52.70
52.70 *
333.00
333.00 *
89.92
89.92 *
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
G &J PATCH /PIN
FAST FRAME
LIZ SUNNE
ALEXANDER BATTERY N
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
SERVICES
EQUIP REPLACE
02 -04 -91 PAGE 5
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 2010 - 000 -00 001689
30- 4516 - 781 -78 692584 2942
30- 3505 - 000 -00
10- 2010 - 000 -00 4614 1311
01/29/91
200.00
DON PERUSSE
REIMBURSEMENT
30- 2010 - 000 -00
200.00
*
01/29/91
523.00
EDINA POLICE
CAR WASHES
10- 2010- 000 -00
01/29/91
87.00
EDINA POLICE
CAR WASHES
10- 4296 - 560 -56
610.00
*
01/29/91
179.50
FLEET FARM
BINOCULARS
10- 4901 - 420 -42
01/29/91
500.00
FLEET FARM
BINOCULARS
10- 4902 - 436 -42
679.50
*
01/29/91
900.00
W SUB MEDIATION CTR
HUMAN SERVICES
10- 4201- 504 -50
900.00
*
01/29/91
10.00
MN MAYOR ASSN
DUES
10- 4206 - 100 -10
10.00
*
01/29/91
820.00
MN REC /PARK ASSN
MEMBERSHIP FEES
10- 4204 - 600 -60
820.00
*
01/29/91
5,761.38
KUNDE CO INC
OAK WILT PROGRAM
10- 2010 - 000 -00.
5,761.38
*
01/29/91
130.56
MUSEUM SERVICE
REPAIRS
27- 4248 - 662 -66
3314 2540
130.56
*
01/29/91
141.60
METRO SALES INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
27- 2010 - 000 -00
286468 3002
141.60
*.
01/29/91
184.85
A -1 FOAM SPECIALTIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
27- 2010 - 000 -00
3223 2319
184.85
01/29/91
3,710.00
PLBG /HTG REPAIR
HOOK UP UTILITY
25- 4900 - 013 -29
583 2620
3,710.00
01/29/91
218.00
EMI
REPAIR PARTS
30- 4540 - 782 -78
35884 3005
218.00
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1991 CITY
OF EDINA
225.21
CHECK REGISTER
BROS.
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
035A21
01/24/91
195.71
ADT SECURITY SYS.
ALARM SERVICE
01/24/91
36.00
195.71
BROS:
INC.
* * * * **
035A29
01/24/91
549.33
ALBINSON
SUPPLIES
BROS.
INC.
549.33
035B30
01/28/91
9.22
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
035A39
01/25/91
177.66
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
HOSE REEL
INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
177.66 "
01/24/91
.17.60
* * * * **
035A53
01/24/91
84.48
AMERICAN SHARECOM
TELEPHONE
035A53
01/24/91
47.95
AMERICAN SHARECOM
TELEPHONE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
035B30
132.43
10.50
BERTELSON
035A54
01/25/91
149.71
AAGARD
WASTE REMOVAL
30.24
BERTELSON
149.71
INC.
DISKETTE
* * * * **
01/29/91
7.18
BERTELSON
BROS.
035B03
01/28/91
17.00
BENSON OPTICAL
SAFETY GLASSES
035603
01/28/91
.23.50
BENSON OPTICAL
SAFETY GLASSES
01/25/91
130.88
40.50
BROS.
INC.
* * * * **
035B27 01/29/91 248.33 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY
035827 01/29/91 330.75 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY
035B27 01/29/91 236.25 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY
815.33 * ,
* * * * **
035B30
01/24/91
225.21
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
SUPPLYS
035B30
01/28/91
15.17
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GLUE
035B30
01/24/91
36.00
BERTELSON
BROS:
INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
035B30
01/24/91
49.02
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
035B30
01/28/91
9.22
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
035B30
01/28/91
149.01 .
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
035B30
01/24/91
.17.60
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
035B30
01/28/91
20.24
BERTELSON
BROS..INC'
.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
035B30
01/25/91
10.50
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
035B30
01/25/91
30.24
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
DISKETTE
035830
01/29/91
7.18
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
035B30
01/29/91
138.70
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
035B30
01/25/91
130.88
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
035B30
01/28/91
2.56
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
035B30
01/24/91
262.43
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
035B30
01/25/91
49.28
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
035630
01/25/91
109.38
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
02 -04 -91 PAGE 6
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
30- 4304 - 782 -78 2847
10- 4570 - 260 -26 707710 2457
40- 4504 - 801 -80 7122 2576
10- 2010 - 000 -00
10- 4256 - 510 -51
30-4250- 782 -78
10- 2010 - 000 -00 438965 2672
10- 2010 - 000 -00 438966 2.671
50- 4626 - 822 -82
50- 4626 - 842 -84
50- 4626 - 862 -86
10- 2010 - 000 -00 29155 2206
10- 2010 - 000 -00 629156 2206
10- 4504 - 200 -20 632168
10- 4504 - 420 -42 637780 2711
10- 4504 - 420 -42 640421
10- 4504 - 420 -42 637857 2711
10- 4504 - 420 -42 636554
10-4504-420-42 640442
10- 4504 - 510 -51
10- 4504 - 540 -54 634304 2436
10- 4504 - 600 -60 640647
10- 4504 - 600 -60 640427 2991
10- 4516- 510 -51 640441
10- 4516 - 510 -51
10- 4516- 510 -51 638246
28- 4516- 701 -70 636801 2635
30- 4516 - 781 -78 638199 2936
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1991 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
02 -04 -91
PAGE 7
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
#
MESSAGE
1,262.62
*
* k k k k k
* ** -CKS
035B32
01/25/91
8.23
BEST LOCK OF MPLS
KEYS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
11384
2674
035832
01/24/91
152.75
BEST LOCK OF MPLS
LOCK SET
10- 4540 - 540 -54
11385
2422
160.98
*
* k k ** k
k k k - C K S
035653
01/29/91
210.00
BAKER POOLS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 783 -78
33624
2835
210.00
*
k k k k* k
* ** -CKS
035899
01/25/91
17.00
BRAEMAR PRO SHOP
PROMOTION
27- 4214- 667 -66
3515
2934
035699,
01/24/91
100.00
BRAEMAR PRO SHOP
RENTAL CLUBS
27- 4504 - 667 -66
3508
2900
117.00
*
* * k * * k
* ** -CKS
035C01
01/24/91
343.08
C & S DISTRIBUTING
COST /GOODS SOLD
23- 4624 - 613 -61
116524
2601
035C01
01/29/91
172.64
C & S DISTRIBUTING
COST /GOODS SOLD
23- 4624 - 613 -61
116967
2717
035C01
01/24/91
185.61
C & S DISTRIBUTING
COST /GOODS SOLD
23- 4624 - 613 -61
116482
2605
701.33
*
kkk * *k
* ** -CKS
035C04
01/29/91
2,695.65
CAMPBELL SPORTS
SHIRTS /AWARDS
27- 4214 - 667 -66
2452
2,695.65
*
k k k k k k
* ** -CKS
035C07
01/24/91
2,732.61
CARGILL INC.
DE -ICING SALT
10- 2010 - 000 -00
682774
035C07
01/24/91
1,317.22
CARGILL INC.
DE -ICING SALT
10- 2010 - 000 -00
682773
035C07
01/28/91
1,331.98
CARGILL INC.
SALT
10- 4538 - 318 -30
685723
8325
035C07
01/28/91
1,362.61
CARGILL INC.
SALT
10- 4538 - 318 -30
685227
8328
035C07
01/28/91
2,703.37
CARGILL INC.
SALT
10- 4538 - 318 -30
684465
8328
9,447.79
*
k k k* k k
* ** -CKS
035C12
01/29/91
32.75
CORNER MARKING CO
OFFICE SUPPLIES
27- 4516 - 661 -66
7874
2911
32.75
*
* k k k k k
* ** -CKS
035C23
01/24/91
69.00
CORE RESTORE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
27- 4516 - 661 -66
018460
2839
69.00
*
k k k* k k
* ** -CKS
035C25
01/29/91
' 48.00
CHAPIN PUBLISHING
ADVERTISING
30- 4214 - 781 -78
3004
48.00
*
k k* k k k
* ** -CKS
1991 CITY
OF EDINA
* ** -CKS
CHECK REGISTER
30- 4214 - 781 -78
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
035C33
01/24/91
292.40
CITY OF EDINA
WATER
035C33
01/24/91
27.10
CITY OF EDINA
WATER
035C33
01/24/91
254.56
CITY OF EDINA
WATER
035C33
01/24/91
27.10
CITY OF EDINA
WATER
035C33
01/24/91
94.60
CITY OF EDINA
WATER
035C33
01/24/91
27.10
CITY OF EDINA
WATER
40- 4504 - 803 -80
3867
722.86
*
40- 4540 - 803 -80
k k * * * k
2645
035C35
01/29/91
201.60
CITYLINE
ADVERTISING
201.60
*
k k k* k k
035C49
01/29/91
550.00
COMPUTERLAND
NETWORK TRAINING
550.00
*
kkkkk k
035C62
01/25/91
380.00
C WAYNE COURTNEY
SERVICES
380.00
*
k k* k k k
035D07
01/29/91
29.65
D.C. HEY CO.
SERVICE CONTRACT
* k k k k k
29.65
*
035D31
01/25/91
427.43
DAVIES WATER EQUIP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
035D31
01/25/91
415.60
DAVIES WATER EQUIP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
035D31
01/25/91
427.56
DAVIES WATER EQUIP
REPAIR PARTS
1,270.59
*
kkkkk *
.
035D43
01/24/91
39.78
DELANO ERICKSON ARCH
CONSTRUCTION
* k k * k k
39.78
*
035D51
01/24/91
212.00
DETERMAN WELDING
GENERAL SUPPLIES
212.00
*
035D52
01/25/91
115.50
DISCOM OF MN INC
RADIO SERVICE
035D52
01/25/91
31.50
DISCOM OF MN INC
RADIO REPAIRS
147.00
*
kkkkk k
035D85
01/24/91
1,289.70
DUFFEY PAPER CO.
PAPER
1,289.70
*
kkkkk k
02 -04 -91 PAGE 8
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 2010 - 000 -00
10- 2010 - 000 -00
10- 2010- 000 -00
10- 2010- 000 -00
50- 2010- 000 -00
50- 2010 - 000 -00
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
30- 4214 - 781 -78
775
3006
* ** -CKS
10- 4504- 507 -50
180719
* ** -CKS
10- 4202 - 490 -49
81645 2524
1004
10- 4248 - 440 -44
81440 2524
* ** -CKS
30- 4201- 782 -78
10- 4504- 510 -51
016840 2554
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
30- 4288 - 781 -78
216195
* ** -CKS
40- 4504 - 803 -80
3866
2655
40- 4504 - 803 -80
3867
2670
40- 4540 - 803 -80
3840
2645
* ** -CKS
60- 2010 - 000 -00
* ** -CKS
10- 4504- 507 -50
180719
10- 4248 - 440 -44
81645 2524
10- 4248 - 440 -44
81440 2524
* ** -CKS
10- 4504- 510 -51
016840 2554
* ** -CKS
1991 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
02 -04 -91
PAGE 9
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
#
MESSAGE
035D98
01/24/91
724.75
DCA INC
FEE FOR SERVICE
10- 21010- 000 -00
42339
724.75
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
035E02
01/24/91
440.74
E KRAEMER & SONS INC
FILL MATERIAL
40- 2010 - 000 - 00.16448
7094
440.74
*
'-
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
035E20
01/24/91
85.00
ECOLAB PEST ELIM.
SERVICE CONTRACTS
30- 4288 - 782- 78-
P02719
85.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
035E69
01/24/91
66.12
ELSMORE AQUATIC
UNIFORMS
30- 4262 - 782 -78
013645
2624
66.12
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
035E75
01/25/91
300.00
EMPLOYEES CLUB
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 500 -50
.300.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
035F11
01/24/91
1,904.73
FEED RITE CONTROL
WATER CHEMICALS
40- 4622 - 805 -80
151204
7342
1,904.73
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
035F19
01/29_/91
1,316.00
FIRST TRUST
FISCAL AGENT
10- 1145 - 000 -00
1,316.00
* * * * **
�
* ** -CKS
035F26
01/28/91
177.45
-
FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL
JET NOZZEL
40- 2010- 000 -00
4196
1898
177.45
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
035F70
01/24/91
638:00
FRIDEN ALCATEL
MAINTENANCE
10- 4290 - 510 -51
638.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
035G09
01/28/91
444.00
GOVT TRAIN SERV
CONT ED
10- 4202 - 420 -42
8432
444.00
*
_
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
035G22
01/24/91
329.86
GENERAL BINDING
LAMINATING SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 520 -52
329.86
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
1991 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK
REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
035G30
01/25/91
74.00
GENERAL SPORTS
SOCCER BALLS
74.00
035G32
01/24/91
105.00
GOPHER .STATE 1 CALL
CALL LOCATES
105.00
* * * * **
035G42
01/29/91
326.61
GIL HEBARD GUNS
AMMO
035G42
01/29/91
189.00
GIL HEBARD GUNS
TARGERTS
515.61
035G44
01/25/91
100.00
GLEN SIPE PIANO
SERV
SERVICE CONTRACT
100.00
035G46
01/24/91
20.40
GARVENS GREETING
SUPPLIES
20.40
035G68
01/24/91
305.92
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC
CO.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
035G68
01/24/91
210.46
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC
CO.
REPAIR PARTS
035G68
01/24/91
92.13
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC
CO.
TELEPHONE
035G68
01/25/91
1,673.68
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC
CO.
FIXTURES'
2,282.19
* * * * **
035G72
01/25/91
45..00
GARY SMIEJA-
REPAIR PARTS
035G72
.01/24/91
360.00
GARY SMIEJA
REPAIR PARTS
* *
405.00
* * **
035G79
01/29/91
5,000.00
GREUPNER -JOE
PRO SERVICES
5,000.00
* * * * **
035G96
01/25/91
314.00
GUY SPEAKER CO.
REPAIR PARTS
314.00
* * * * **
035H03
01/24/91
1,984.20
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
WATER METER
035H03
01/29/91
1,619.76
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
WATER METERS
035H03
01/24/91
2,177.26
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
WATER METER
035H03
01/24/91
2,015.80
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
WATER METERS
02 -04 -91 PAGE 10
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
27- 4504- 667 -66 032534 2932
* ** -CKS
10- 4318 - 280 -28 1990
* ** -CKS
29- 4572 - 722 -72 41601 2546
29- 4648 - 722 -72 41601 2546
* ** -CKS
30- 4288 - 782 -78 910118 3927
* ** -CKS
50- 4632 - 862 -86 2215
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 560 -56 219130 2516
10- 4540- 322 -30 219982 2154
10- 4540 - 646 -64 218329 2481
40- 4540- 802 -80 220621 2801
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
10- 4540 - 560 -56
* ** -CKS
27- 4201 - 661 -66
* ** -CKS
40- 4540 - 801 -80 6833 2487
40- 1220 - 000 -00 3291 2439
40- 1220 - 000 -00 3301 2439
40- 1220 - 000 -00 3281 5189
40- 1220 - 000 -00 3280 2439
* ** -CKS
1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
035H03 01/25/91 1,782.47 HYDRO SUPPLY CO WATER METERS
035H03 01/24/91 47.95 HYDRO SUPPLY CO GASKETS
PARTS
02 -04 -91 PAGE 11
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
40- 1220- 000 -00 3293 2439
40- 4540 - 807 -80 3273 5189
* ** -CKS
10- 4620 - 560 -56 105577 2425
* ** -CKS
9,627.44
10- 4540 - 560 -56 2169
* * * * **
10- 4620 - 560 -56 2577
245831 2759
* ** -CKS
035H09
01/25/91
255.95
HALLMAN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
* ** -CKS
255.95
25- 2010 - 000 -00 539631 1603
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
035H16
01/25/91
193.10
H &L MESABI
035H16
01/25/91
189.36
H &L MESABI
* * * * **
10- 2010 - 000 -00
382.46
035H33
01/28/91
367.90
HENN CTY SHERIFF
035H33
01/28/91
18.00
HENN CTY SHERIFF
GENERAL SUPPLIES
23- 4504 - 612 -61
385.90
* * * * **
27- 2010 - 000 -00
035H42
01/24/91
570.96
HERMAN MILLER INC.
570.96
* * * * **
035H56
01/29/91
23.93
HIRSHFIELDS
23.93
* * * * **
035H61
01/24/91
310.12
HOFFERS INC
310.12
035I59
01/28/91
39.75
INTERIOR COM SYS
39.75
* * * * **
035I67
01/28/91
183.81
INTERNL TRUCKS INC
183.81
* * * * **
035J27
01/29/91
11.61
JERRYS FOODS
035J27
01/29/91
28.27
JERRYS FOODS
035J27
01/29/91
130.76
JERRYS FOODS
170.64
* * * * **
035J35
01/24/91
18.42
JERRYS PRINTING
PARTS
02 -04 -91 PAGE 11
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
40- 1220- 000 -00 3293 2439
40- 4540 - 807 -80 3273 5189
* ** -CKS
10- 4620 - 560 -56 105577 2425
CULTURAL EXPO 10- 4280 - 504 -50 5491
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56 2169
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56 2577
245831 2759
* ** -CKS
WORKHOUSE /JAIL
10- 2010 - 000 -00
EQUIP MAINT
10- 2010 - 000 -00
GENERAL SUPPLIES
* ** -CKS
REMODELING
25- 2010 - 000 -00 539631 1603
CULTURAL EXPO 10- 4280 - 504 -50 5491
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
PAINT /LUMBER
30- 4544- 782 -78
245831 2759
a
* ** -CKS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10 =4504- 648 -64
172437 1864
* ** -CKS
EQUIP MAINT
10- 4274 - 420 -42
030837
* ** -CKS
REPAIR WORK
10- 2010 - 000 -00
63253 2278
* ** -CKS
CLEANING SUPPLIES
10- 4512 - 440 -44
GENERAL SUPPLIES
23- 4504 - 612 -61
CONCESSIONS
27- 2010 - 000 -00
CULTURAL EXPO 10- 4280 - 504 -50 5491
* ** -CKS
1991 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
035J35
01/24/91
79.52
JERRYS PRINTING
PRINTING
97.94
* * * * **
035J74
01/24/91
35.85
JUSTUS LUMBER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
035J74
01/24/91
282.38
JUSTUS LUMBER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
035J74
01/24/91
52.69
JUSTUS LUMBER
SHOP MATERIALS
* * * * **
370.92
035J99
01/29/91
40.00
JANET CANTON
MILEAGE /LOGIS
* * * * **
40.00
035K35
01/25/91
101.64
KNOX COMM CREDIT
BATTERIES
035K35
01/24/91
35.41-
KNOX COMM CREDIT
CREDIT
035K35
01/24/91
147.88
KNOX COMM CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
035K35
01/24/91
38.17
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
035K35
01/24/91
28.91
KNOX COMM CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
035K35
01/24/91
23.73
KNOX COMM CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
035K35
01/24/91
22.29
KNOX COMM CREDIT
REPAIR PARTS
035K35
01/29/91
68.85
KNOX COMM CREDIT
LUMBER
035K35
01/25/91
77.45
KNOX COMM CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
473.51 *
* * * * **
035L01
01/25/91
615.00
LINDA KOZAK
PAYMENT
615.00 *
* * * * **
035L28
01/24/91
206.67
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
035L28
01/24/91
457.45
LAWSON PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
035L28
01/24/91
445.85
LAWSON PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
035L28
01/24/91
368.20
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
* * * * **
1,478.17
035L44
01/25/91
125.00
LEAANNS SEW /DECO
REPAIRS
125.00
* * * * **
035L46
01/25/91
91.43
LIEN INFECTION CON
SERVICES
91.43
* * * * **
035L52
01/29/91
297.30
LINJO ASSOC
WATER TREATMENT
297.30
02 -04 -91 PAGE 12
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4504 - 621 -62 5492
10- 2010 - 000 -00 71464 2114
10- 2010 - 000 -00 71247 2000
40- 2010 - 000 -00 71958 2146
10- 4208 - 160 -16
10- 4504 - 325 -30
10- 4504 - 646 -64
10- 4504 - 646 -64
10- 4604 - 646 -64
27- 4540 - 667 -66
27- 4540 - 667 -66
27- 4540 - 667 -66
27- 4604 - 662 -66
28- 4504 - 702 -70
30- 4201 - 781 -78
720702 2586
720782
720812 2607
792564 2638
823264 2475
720817 2676
792492 2769
792937 2922
807971 2833
10- 2010 - 000 -00 2316
10- 2010 - 000 -00 2316
40- 2010 - 000 -00 2317
40- 2010 - 000 -00 2350
10- 4248 - 440 -44 91004 2732
27- 4288 - 667 -66
30- 4564 - 783 -78 3023 3003
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1991 CITY
OF EDINA
MIDWEST MACHINERY
CHECK
REGISTER
MIDWEST MACHINERY
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
* * * * **
492.00
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC
01/25/91
436.17
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC
035L60
01/24/91
3,787.79
LOGIS
DATA
ENTRY
035L60
01/24/91
2,463.57
LOGIS
DATA
ENTRY
035L60
01/24/91
3,128.32
LOGIS
DATA
.ENTRY .
035L60
01/24/91
1,842.76
LOGIS
DATA
ENTRY
035L60
01/24/91
292.47
LOGIS
DATA
ENTRY
035L60
01/24/91
292.47'
LOGIS
DATA
ENTRY
035L60
01/24/91
292.47
. LOGIS
DATA
ENTRY
* * * * **
27- 4504 - 662 -66
12,099.85
2557
01/25/91
74.75
035L70
01/29/91
125.00
LUCY ROSCHE
CLEANING
035L70
01/29/91
90.00
LUCY ROSCHE
CLEANING
CLEANING SUPPLIES
28 -4512- 702 -70
215.00
2764
01/24/91
415.60
01/24/91
1,970.04
MIDWEST MACHINERY
01/25/91
.94.93
MIDWEST MACHINERY
26044
2,064.97
01/24/91
01/25/91
498.04
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC
01/25/91
492.00
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC
01/25/91
436.17
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC
MERIT
1,426.21
GENERAL SUPPLIES
01/25/91
188.05
MCNEILUS STEEL
01/25/91
326.50
MCNEILUS STEEL
01/25/91
326.50
MCNEILUS STEEL
26068
841.05 * .
01/24/91
REPAIR WORK
REPAIR PARTS
FLANGE /CABLE
BROOM
FLANGE /CABLE
02 -04 -91 PAGE 13
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
10- 2010 - 000 -00
10- 2010 - 000 -00
40- 2010 - 000 -00
50- 2010 - 000 -.00
50- 2010 - 000 -00
50- 2010 - 000 -00
* ** -CKS
27- 4201 - 662 -66 30613 1465
27- 4201 - 662 -66 30615 1466
* * *- -CKS
10- 2010 - 000 -00 S00140 2501
10- 4540- 560 -56 P02084 2486
10- 4534 - 310 -30 11257 2288
10- 4534 - 310 -30 11218 2483
10- 4540 - 560 -56 11258 2292
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
SWHEET 10- 4540 - 540 -54 105577 2426
REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 106129 2489
PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 105757 2437
* ** -CKS
01/25/91
496.90.
MERIT
SUPPLY
SIGN
10- 4322 - 280 -28
26044
2490
01/24/91
488.25
MERIT
SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 318 -30
25964
2484
01/25/91
189.00
MERIT
SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 560 -56
26016
2594
01/29/91
4,458.25
MERIT
SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 645 764
26068
2706
01/24/91
91.65
MERIT
SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
10- 4512- 520 -52
26069
2639
01/25/91
190.20
MERIT
SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
10- 4512 - 540 -54
25986
2513
01/25/91
327.25
MERIT
SUPPLY
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
26046
2653
01/29/91
69.00
MERIT
SUPPLY
DOORMATES
27- 4504 - 662 -66
25984
2557
01/25/91
74.75
MERIT
SUPPLY
CARPET.CLEANER
27-4512-667-66,26009
2608
01/25/91
482.00
MERIT
SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
28 -4512- 702 -70
26081
2764
01/24/91
415.60
MERIT
SUPPLY
EQUIPMENT
30- 1340 - 782 -78
26048
2750
01/24/91
4,911.10-
MERIT
SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
26066
2772
01/24/91
4,911.10
MERIT
SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
26066
2772
01/25/91
489.37
MERIT
SUPPLY:
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
26117
2844
01/24/91
4,911.14-
MERIT
SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 - 7826066
2772
1991 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
035M27
01/24/91
035M27
01/24/91
035M27
01/24/91
035M27
01/24/91
035M27
01/29/91
035M27
01/24/91
035M27
01/25/91
035M27
01/25/91
* * * * k
035M29
01/2,8/91
* * k * k *
035M32
01/24/91.
035M32
01/24/91
035M32
01/29/91
035M32
01/29/91
035M32
01%24/91
MERIT SUPPLY
'SAFETY PAINT
035M35
01/25/91
* k * * * k
035M46
01/29/91
035M46
01/25/91
110.42
23.42
035M49
01/29/91
035M49
01/25/91
035M68
01/28/91
035M68
01/25/91
035M68
01/25/91
035M68
01/28/91
035M68
01/28/91
035M68
01/28/91
035M68
01/28/91.
035M68
01/28/91
035M68
01/28/91
035M68
01/28/91
035M68
01/28/91
035M68
01/28/91
02 -04 -91 PAGE. 14
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
30- 4504- 782 -78
30- 4504- 782 -78
30- 4504 - 782 -78
30- 4504 - 782 -78
30- 4512 - 782 -78
30- 4512- 782 -78
40- 4504 - 801 -80
40- 4504 - 801 -80
10- 2010 - 000 -00
26006
26066
26066
26066
26145
26067
26047
26008
50- 4632 - 822 -82 2776
50- 4632 - 842 -84 2774
50- 4632 - 842 -84 2934
50- 4632 - 862 -86 2907
50- 4632 - 862 -86 2772
40- 4312 - 812 -80
2772
2772
2772
2772
2921
2763
2651
2571
27- 4624 - 663 -66 2700
28- 4624 - 703 -70 2779
90.52
CHECK REGISTER
FIRST
AMOUNT
VENDOR.
ITEM DESCRIPTION
.491.10-
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
491.10
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
4,911.14
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
491.10
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
477.15
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
471.70
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
119.80
MERIT SUPPLY
PAINT
182.40
MERIT SUPPLY
'SAFETY PAINT
9,514.37
81.91
MN
110.42
MESSERLI & KRAMER
AMBULANCE COLLECT
110.42
23.42
MN
392.74
M AMUNDSON
CIGRETTES
408.68
M AMUNDSON.
CIGARETTES
473.72
M AMUNDSON
MIX
172.78
M AMUNDSON
MISC BILL
140.58
M AMUNDSON
CIGARETTES
1,588.50 *
-
EQUIP
226,698.00
METRO WASTE CONTROL
SEWER SERVICE
226,698.00
PHONE
RENTAL
5.51
METZ BAKING CO
BREAD
22.00
METZ BAKING CO
COST /GOODS
27.51
EQUIP
10- 4226- 420 -42
02 -04 -91 PAGE. 14
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
30- 4504- 782 -78
30- 4504- 782 -78
30- 4504 - 782 -78
30- 4504 - 782 -78
30- 4512 - 782 -78
30- 4512- 782 -78
40- 4504 - 801 -80
40- 4504 - 801 -80
10- 2010 - 000 -00
26006
26066
26066
26066
26145
26067
26047
26008
50- 4632 - 822 -82 2776
50- 4632 - 842 -84 2774
50- 4632 - 842 -84 2934
50- 4632 - 862 -86 2907
50- 4632 - 862 -86 2772
40- 4312 - 812 -80
2772
2772
2772
2772
2921
2763
2651
2571
27- 4624 - 663 -66 2700
28- 4624 - 703 -70 2779
90.52
MATRX MEDICAL INC
FIRST
AID SUPPLIES
10- 4510- 440 -44 164668 1810
17.61
MATRX MEDICAL INC
AMBULANCE
SUPPLIES
10- 4510- 440 -44 161043 1803
108.13
14.14
MN
CELLULAR
PHONE
PHONE
RENTAL
10- 2010- 000 -00 2538
65.56
MN
CELLULAR
PHONE
CAR PHONE
10- 4204 - 100 -10
81.91
MN
CELLULAR
PHONEi
CAR PHONE
10 -4204- 140 -14 807727
23.42
MN
CELLULAR
PHONE
RENTAL
EQUIP
10- 4226 - 420 -42
6.84
MN
CELLULAR
PHONE
RENTAL
EQUIP
10- 4226 - 420 -42
7.44
MN
CELLULAR
PHONE
RENTAL
EQUIP
10- 4226 - 420 -42
17.23
MN
CELLULAR
PHONE
RENTAL
EQUIP
10- 4226 - 420 -42
166.43
MN
CELLULAR
PHONE
RENTAL
EQUIP
10- 4226- 420 -42
17.48
MN
CELLULAR
PHONE
RENTAL
EQUIP
10- 4226 - 420 -42
48.69
MN
CELLULAR
PHONE
RENTAL
EQUIP
10- 4226 - 420 -42
57.07
MN
CELLULAR.
PHONE
RENTAL
EQUIP
10- 4226 - 420 -42
76.94
MN
CELLULAR
PHONE
RENTAL
EQUIP
10- 4226 - 420 -42
* ** -CKS c
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1991 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
AMOUNT
583.15
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
01/25/91
44.75
MN. CONWAY
EXTING SERVICE
01/24/91
54.50
MN. CONWAY
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
99.25
01/24/91
24.80
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
AD FOR BIDS
01/29/91
54.72
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
AD FOR BID
01/29/91
58.50.1
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
AD /LIFT STATION
01%29/91,
26.66
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
AD FOR BID '
01/24/91
20.12
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
NOTICE /PUBLIC HRG
01/24/91
116.00
MN SUBURBAN NEWS
WANT ADS
300.80
01/25/91
178.92
MN. TORO INC.
REPAIR PARTS
178.92
01/29/91
146.25
MONARCH MARKETING
OFFICE SUPPLIES
01/29/91
146.25
MONARCH MARKETING
PREV MAINT
292.50
01/28/91
65.00
MOTOROLA INC
RADIO REPAIR
65.00
01/24/91
4,004.40
MPLS FINANCE DEPT.
WATER PURCHASED
4,004.40
01/24/91
1,170.00
MPLS SEWER &WATER
REPAIRS
1,170.00
01/24/91
319.92
MUNICILITE CO.
SPOTLIGHT
319.92 "
01/24/91
32.39
NAPA AUTO PARTS
GAUGE
01/24/91.
37.81
NAPA AUTO PARTS
SWITCH
70.20
01/29/91
233.63
NATL GUARDIAN SYS.
ALARM SERVICE
233.63
02 -04 -91 PAGE 15
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
j
* ** -CKS
10- 4274- 440 -44 156616 2526
10- 4642- 420 -42 156617
10- 4210 - 140 -14
10- 4210 - 140 -14
10- 4210 - 140 -14
10- 4210 - 140 -14
10- 4210 - 140 -14
10- 4212 - 510 -51
89783
25739
25739
25739
89784
`III 16Y t i II-I T 29-IM [* R I Y �'4 L -* 1
50- 4516 - 820 -82 706726
50- 4516 - 860 -86 706725
10- 2010 - 000 -00 5050
40- 2010 - 000 -00
40- 4248 - 803 -80 030268 2637
10- 4620- 560 -56 2681 2512
10- 4540 - 560 -56 627221 2562
10- 4540 - 560 -56 627093 2508
50- 4304 - 841 -84
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS:
* ** -CKS
1991 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
035N31
01/25/91
391.15
NEBCO DISTRIBUTING
COST /GOODS SOLD
035N31
01/25/91
58.80
NEBCO DISTRIBUTING
COST OG GOODS
xxxxxx
449.95
035N36
01/29/91
19.96
NORTHERN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
035N36
01/28/91
39.92
NORTHERN
REPAIR PARTS
59.88
xxxxxx
035N48
01/25/91
41.72
NO STAR TURF
REPAIR PARTS
41.72
xxxxxx
035N56
01/24/91
194.60
NORTHERN POWER PROD.
PARTS
xxxxxx
194.60
*
035N82
01/29/91
171.72
NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY
COST /GOODS SOLD
171.72
*
xxxxxx
035017
01/29/91
176.00
OFFICE PRODUCTS
INSTALL DRIVE
035017
01/29/91
3,000.00
OFFICE PRODUCTS
SERVICE CONTRACT
035017
01/29/91
120.00
OFFICE PRODUCTS
MOUSE
035017
01/24/91
280.00
OFFICE PRODUCTS
SERVICE CONTRACT
3,576.00
*
xxxxxx
035024
01/24/91
195.00
OFFSET PRINTING
PRINTING
035024
01/24/91
433.80
OFFSET PRINTING
PRINTING
xxxxxx
628.80
*
035036
01/24/91
46.34
OLSON CHAIN & CABLE
REPAIR PARTS
035036
01/24/91
9.30
OLSON CHAIN & CABLE
REPAIR PARTS
55.64
xxxxxx
035038
01/24/91
177.00
OLSON FIRE PRO.
REPAIRS
xxxxxx
177.00
'
035P08
01/29/91
3,405.60
PERKINS LSCAPE CONST
CONSTRUCTION
3,405.60
*
02 -04 -91 PAGE 16
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
28- 4624 - 703 -70 032922 2679
28- 4624 - 703 -70 032923 2917
* ** -CKS
27- 2010 - 000 -00 422959 2257
27- 2010 - 000 -00 422115 2253
* ** -CKS
27- 4540 - 664 -66 290730 2830
* ** -CKS
10- 2010 - 000 -00 248780 2286
* ** -CKS
23- 4624 - 613 -61 180583 2609
* ** -CKS
10- 4288 - 510 -51 130928 2374
10- 4288 - 510 -51 128956 2622
10- 4504 - 420 -42 131409
30- 4288 - 781 -78 130867 2849
* ** -CKS
10- 4600 - 420 -42 31372 2455
10- 4600 - 420 -42 31371 2454
* ** -CKS
27- 4540 - 664 -66 106711 2687
30- 4540 - 782 -78 106649 2628
* ** -CKS
27- 4248 - 667 -66 9819 2901
* ** -CKS
27- 4306 - 664 -66
1991 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
10- 4504 - 500 -50
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
035P11
01/29/91
50.00
PARK NIC MED CTR
PHYSICAL
035P11
01/29/91
286.50
PARK NIC MED CTR
PHYSICAL
035P11
01/29/91
830.00
PARK NIC MED CTR
PHYSICAL
34955
2511
1,166.50
035P35
01/24/91
13.66
PETERSON- BARBARA
PRO SERVICES
035P35
01/24/91
12.79
PETERSON- BARBARA
GENERAL SUPPLIES
035P35
01/24/91
22.12
PETERSON- BARBARA
OFFICE SUPPLIES
k k k* k k
48.57
10- 4504- 301 -30
1331
.035P48
01/24/91
149.50
PIP PRINTING
PRINTING
035P48
01/24/91
:7.00
PIP PRINTING
PRINITNG
156.50
* k k * k *
f
035P54
01/25/91
.372.50
PLANT &FLANGED EQU
REPAIR APRTS
372.50
035P64
01/29/91
15.43.
POMMER CO
PLAQUE
15.43
035P84
01/29/91
56.76
PRO INSTANT PRINT
CULTURAL EXPO
56.76
035Q20
01/25/91
61.32
QUICK SERV BATTERY
FILTER
035Q20
01/25/91
27.45
QUICK SERV BATTERY
FILTER
-
88.77
035R01
01/25/91
93.95
R &R SPECIALTIES INC
GENERAL'SUPPLIES
93.95
035R21
01/24/91
177.55
RED WING SHOES
SHOES
035R21
01%24/91
225.20
RED WING SHOES
SHOES
402.75
035R22
01/25/91
68.00
REM SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
0.35R22
01/25/91
259:90
REM SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
02 -04 -91 PAGE 17
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
10- 2010 - 000 -00
10- 2010 - 000 -00
* ** -CKS
30- 4201 - 781 -78
30- 4504- 782 -78
30- 4516 - 781'' =78
* ** -CKS
30- 4600- 781 -78 8567
30- 4600- 781 -78
* ** -CKS
40- 4540 - 807 -80 10750 2646
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 500 -50
024539
* ** -CKS
10- 4280 - 504 -50
40682
2989
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
34946
2507
10- 4540 - 560 -56
34955
2511
* ** -CKS
28- 4504- 704 -70
14181
2916
* ** -CKS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
10- 2010 - 000 -00
10- 4504- 301 -30
1331
2589
10- 4504 - 646 -64
1330
2590
1991 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT
035R22
01/28/91
462.00
035R22
01/29/91
648.00
035R22
01/28/91
125.00
035R22
01/24/91
349.90
035R22
01/24/91
457.02
035R22
01/24/91
73.31
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
2,443.13 *
k k k* k k
TOOLS
035R25
01/24/91
95.60
035R25
01/24/91
320.90
k k k k k
416.50 *
035R49
01/25/91
60.00
035R49
01/29/91
86.81
035R49
01/25/91
85.00
231.81 *
k * k k * k
035R53
01/25/91
45.30
45.30 *
k k R * * k
035R98
01/25/91
96.00
96.00 *
k k* k k k
035S03
01/25/91
47.55
47.55 *
kk * * *k
035S10
01/24/91
413.28
035S10
01/24/91
387.68
800.96 *
k k k k* k
035S27
01/29/91
90.08
035S27
01/25/91
46.89
136.97 *
k k k* k k
035S54
01/24/91
140.40
140.40 *
* k * * k k
035S63
01/25/91
180.50
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
REM
SUPPLIES
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
REM
SUPPLIES
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
REM
SUPPLIES
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
REM
SUPPLIES
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
REM
SUPPLIES
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
REM
SUPPLIES
TOOLS
RENTAL EQUIP & SALES SAW PARTS
RENTAL EQUIP & SALES CHAIN SAW
ROAD RESCUE
ROAD RESCUE
ROAD RESCUE
ROBERT B. HILL
ROXANNE SEIDEL
S. T. ROBB
02 -04 -91 PAGE 18
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
30- 2010 - 000 -00
30- 4504 - 782 -78
30- 4504 - 782 -78
30- 4504 - 782 -78
30- 4504 - 783 -78
30- 4580 - 782 -78
1273
01373
1295
1341
01317
01333
2928
2929
2927
2823
2777
2778
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 644 -64 1859 2505
10- 4580 - 644 -64 1858 2502
* ** -CKS
BATTERY STICKS 10- 4504 - 440 -44 1126 2532
WARNING LITES 10- 4504- 440 -44 2195 2730
AMBER LIGHT 10- 4504 - 440 -44 1316 2730
SALT
PRO SERVICES
FASTENERS
SUBURBAN TIRE & AUTO TIRES
SUBURBAN TIRE & AUTO TIRES
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
STAR TRIBUNE
STATES ELECTRIC MFG
PAINT
PAINT
DUES /SUBSCRIPTNS
REPAIR PARTS
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 440 -44 27075 2528
* ** -CKS
30- 4201 - 781 -78
* ** -CKS
40- 4540 - 802 -80 55040 2506
* ** -CKS
10- 4616 - 560 -56 15228 2499
10- 4616 - 560 -56 15261 2561
* ** -CKS
27- 4544 - 662 -66 12621 3001
40- 4540 - 802 -80 215 -0 2409
* ** -CKS
30- 4204 - 782 -78
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 322 -30 425 1716
1991 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
* * * * **
035S72
035S72
035S72
035S72
035S72
035S72
* * * * **
035S77
035S77
035S77
035S77
035S77
035S78
035S78
035S78
035S78
035578
035S78
035S78
035S78
* * * * **
035S92
035S92
035T02
035T02
035T02
035T13
035T13
* * * * **
035T40
* * * * **
AMOUNT
180.50
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
01/28/91
52.75 -
STREICHERS
01/28/91
212.00
STREICHERS
01/28/91
423.00
STREICHERS
01/28/91
19.90
STREICHERS
01/28/91
242.50
STREICHERS
01/28/91
301.55
STREICHERS
TAMARACK
1,251.70
01/25/91
01/25/91
100.00
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
01/25/91
64.28
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
01/25/91
60.51
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET.
01/25/91
11.55
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET.
01/25/91
8.62-
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
227.72
01/24/91
64.22
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
01/25/91
313.61
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
01/24/91
52.63
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
01/24/91
52.61
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
01/24/91
22.34
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
01/24/91.
52.63-
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
01/25/91
90.40
SUBURBAN PLUMB. SUP
01/24/91
381.78
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
924.98
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
AMMUNITION
AMMUNITION
AMMUNITION
REPAIR WORK
REPAIR WORK
REPAIR WORK
VALVE
CREDIT
PLUMBING PARTS
STEEL.FITTINGS
PIPE 'SUPPLY
PIPE SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PIPE SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
TOOLS
01/29/91
267.65
SYSTEM SUPPLY
DISKETTES
01/29/91
8.80
SYSTEM SUPPLY
DISKETTES
10- 4540 - 560 -56
276.45
10 -4540- 646 -64
2656
01/24/91
32.73
TAMARACK
GENERAL SUPPLIES
01/24/91
23.30
TAMARACK
GENERAL SUPPLIES
01/25/91
17.45
TAMARACK
LUMBER
40- 4580- 803 -80
73.48
01/24/91 499.20 TOM HORWATH
01/24/91 858.00 TOM HORWATH
1,357.20
01/24/91 10.00
10.00
TOLL COMPANY
FORESTRY
TRIMMING /INSPECTNS
PROPANE
02 -04 -91 PAGE 19
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
10- 4226 - 420 -42
10- 4266 - 420 -42
10- 4266 - 420 -42 154831 9105
10- 4572 - 420 -42
10- 4572 - 420 -42
10- 4572- 420 -42
10- 4248 - 560 -56
114876
10- 4248 - 560 -56
113841
10- 4248 - 560 -56
115369
10- 4540 - 560 -56
139068
10- 4540 - 560 -56
139188
10 -4540- 646 -64
2656
10- 4620 - 560 -56
2416
40- 2010 - 000 -00
2360
40- 4504 - 801 -80
2360
40- 4504- 801 -80
2421
40- 4504 - 801 -80
2360
40- 4540- 801 -80
2657
40- 4580- 803 -80
2566
10- 4504 - 510 -51 10550 2826
10 -4504- 510 -51 10615 2826
30- 4504 - 782 -78 135802 2775
30- 4504 - 782-78 135090 2775
30- 4544 - 782 -78 137436 2629
10- 4201 - 644 -64
10- 4201 - 980 -64
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
10- 2010 - 000 -00 108465 2572
* ** -CKS
r
1991 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
035T42
01/25/91
035T42
01/25/91
* * * * **
035T66
01/29/91
* * * * **
035T84
01/25/91
* * * * **
035T96
01/24/91
* * * * **
035U08
01/28/91
035U08
01/28/91
035U08
01/28/91
035U08
01/24/91
* * * * **
035V30
01/24/91
035V30
01/24/91
* * * * **
035V80
01/24/91
035V80
01/24/91
035V80
01/24/91
035V80
01/25/91
035V80
01/25/91
* * * * **
035W08
01/24/91
035W08
01/24/91
* * * * **
035W11
01/28/91
035W11
01/28/91
035W11
01/28/91
035W11
01/28/91
AMOUNT
76.99
231.55
308.54 *
49.79
49.79 *
187.31
187.31 *
313.65
313.65 *
1,603.80
53.90
46.65
6.95
1,711.30 *
493.12
499.00
992.12 *
26.88
456.84
28.16
432.72
83.28
1,027.88 *
17.31
150.14
167.45 *
344.75
494.65-
494.64
467.16
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
TOOLS BY OLSEN GENERAL SUPPLIES
TOOLS BY OLSEN GENERAL SUPPLIES
TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT CRAFT SUPPLIES
TWIN CITY ENGINE GASKETS
TWIN CITY GAR. DOOR REPLACE SPRINGS
UNIFORM UNLIMITED
UNIFORM UNLIMITED
UNIFORM UNLIMITED
UNIFORM UNLIMITED
VANTAGE ELECTRIC
VANTAGE ELECTRIC
VOSS ELECTRIC SUP
VOSS ELECTRIC SUP
VOSS ELECTRIC SUP
VOSS ELECTRIC SUP
VOSS ELECTRIC SUP
W.W. GRAINGER
W.W. GRAINGER
W. GORDON SMITH
W. GORDON SMITH
W. GORDON SMITH
W. GORDON SMITH
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PRO SERV
PRO SERVICES
REPAIR PARTS
LAMPS
REPAIR PARTS
LAMPS
LAMP
FAN
TIMER
GASOLINE
GASOLINE
GASOLINE
GASOLINE
02 -04 -91 PAGE 20
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4504- 646 -64 31801 2556
28- 4504 - 702 -70 31800 2712
23- 4588 - 611 -61 416075 2608
10- 4540- 560 -56 65944 2485
10- 4540 - 540 -54 15324 2573
10- 2010 - 000 -00
10- 2010 - 000 -00
10- 2010- 000 -00
30- 4504 - 781 -78 14612 2421
30- 4201 - 782 -78 11444 2470
30- 4201 - 782-78 11445 2472
10- 2010 - 000 -00 280075 2307
10- 2010- 000 -00 280176 2406
10- 4540 - 520 -52 280286 2433
27- 4504- 662 -62 280591 2578
50- 4504 - 864 -86 280608 2584
10- 4540 - 520 -52 2480
40- 4540 - 801 -80 2568
27- 2010 - 000 -00 122 1996
27- 2010- 000 -00 40687 1300
27- 2010- 000 -00 40687 1300
27- 2010- 000 -00 40735 1299
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1991 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
035W11
01/28/91
*kkkkk
VENDOR
035W28
01/24/91
k * * * k k
MESSAGE
035W35
01/29/91
k k k k k k
035W44
01/28/91
035W44
01/25/91
k k k k k k
035W49
01/28/91
035W49
01/24/91
k k k k k
035W66
01/24/91
035W89
- 01/24/91
k k * k
035X05
01/25/91
k k * k k k
GENERAL SUPPLIES
065M27
01/25/91
kkkkkk
CHECK REGISTER
02 -04 -91
PAGE 21
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
#
MESSAGE
494.65
W. GORDON SMITH
GASOLINE
27- 2010- 000 -00
40687
1300
1,306.55
*
* ** -CKS
79.67
WATER PRODUCTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
40- 4504 - 812 -80
191767
2560
79.67
*
* ** -CKS
49.50
WEIGLE -SUE
MILEAGE
10- 2010 - 000 -00
49.50
* ** -CKS
269.15
WEST WELD SUPPLY CO.
WELDING SUPPLIES
10- 2010 - 000 -00
88242
2343
333.10
WEST WELD SUPPLY CO.
ELECTRODE
10- 4610 - 560 -56
88217
2598
602.25
k.
kkk -CKS
301.95
WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT
REPAIR WORK
10 -2010- 000 -00
26875
2358
300.00
WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT
REPAIR PARTS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
26874
2357
601.95
* -:
* ** -CKS
61:64
WILLIAMS STEEL
PARTS
10 -4620- 560 -56
61.64
kkk -CKS
194.00
WORLD CLASS WINE
BEER BILL
50- 4630 - 862 -86
3318
194.00
kkk -CKS
410.01
XEROX CORP
1991 BUDGET
10- 4504 - 510 -51
2271
410.01
-
k k k - C K S
467.50
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANER
10- 4620 - 560 -56
26045
2654
467.50
-
kkk -CKS
86,278.76
FUND 10 TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
676.00
FUND 11 TOTAL
C.D.B.G.
1,356.33
FUND 23 TOTAL
ART CENTER
4,280.96
FUND 25 TOTAL
CAPITAL FUND
54.95
FUND 26 TOTAL
SWIMMING POOL FUND
16,141.47
FUND 27 TOTAL
GOLF COURSE FUND
1,713.71
FUND 28 TOTAL
RECREATION CENTER FUND
- 515:61
FUND 29 TOTAL
GUN RANGE FUND
14,657.09
FUND 30 TOTAL
EDINBOROUGH PARK
s
1991 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
AMOUNT
251,743.21
469.69
5,801.20
1,589.78
385,278.76
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR
FUND 40 TOTAL
FUND 41 TOTAL
FUND 50 TOTAL
FUND 60 TOTAL
TOTAL
ITEM DESCRIPTION
UTILITY FUND
STORM SEWER UTILITY
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
CONSTRUCTION FUND
02 -04 -91 PAGE 22
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
CFlEcK M187ER 0AT90
PAGES
THROUGH
-wTifANAGER A
:A E InEC.TOR ATE