Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-03-04_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL MARCH 4, 1991 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL - HRA & COUNCIL COUNCIL PROCLAMATION - CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME AWARENESS WEEK ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS - Adopt Commissioners as to HRA items and by the agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) are considered to be routine and will be separate discussion of such items unless requests, in which case the item will be in its normal sequence on the Agenda. , ion of Consent Agenda Items is made by the Council Members as to Council items. All and in bold print are Consent Agenda Items and enacted by one motion. There will be no a Commissioner or Council Member or citizen so removed from the Consent Agenda and considered EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA MEETING OF FEBRUARY 19, 1991 * II. PAYMENT OF HRA CLAWS III. ADJOURNMENT OF HRA EDINA CITY'COUNCIL * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of Regular Meetings of January 7 'and 22, 1991 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close.hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall'vote of.all members of .Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Temporary Conditional Use Permit - Home Occupation - Dr. Joyce Anderson, 7121 Glouchester Avenue B. Appeal of Board of Appeals and Adjustments Decision - .Setback and Height Variances - U.S. West NewVector Group, 5600 Lincoln Drive C. Final Plat Approval - Farrells Parkwood Knolls - 5700 Blake Road D. Request to Reconsider Conditional Use Permit - Hennepin County Library - 7001 York Avenue E. Set Hearing Date (03/18/91) 1. RMD, Regional Medical District to POD -1, Planned Office District - Lot 2, Block 2, Southdale Acres - Diversified Credit Union, 6525 Drew Avenue So 2. Preliminary Plat`Approval - Brennan Addition - Lot 5, Block 7, Indian Hills III. PUBLIC HEARING - SALE OF STRONG BEER IN RESTAURANTS HOLDING WINE LICENSES IV. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS Agenda Edina City Council March 4, 1991 Page 2 V. AWARD OF BIDS * A. Case Skid Loader Attachment * B. Signs for Yorkdale Liquor Store VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Mon A. On Sale Wine License and On Sale'3.2 Beer License - Two Guys from Italy, 18 7495 France Avenue So 7:00 B. Feasibility Report - Sidewalks— Set Hearing Date Council C. Solid Waste Collection Options * D. Yard Waste Rebate Application 19 E. Appointments to Advisory Boards /Commissions /Committees , 6:00 F. Appointment to The Edina Foundation Board Braemar G. Appointments to East Edina Housing Foundation Board VII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES VIII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL IX. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS X. FINANCE * A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 03/04/91: Total SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Sat Mar .9 Council Strategic Planning'Meeting 8:00 a.m. Arneson Acres Mon Mar 18 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Tues Mar 19 Annual Council /Advisory Boards Dinner Meeting 6:00 p.m. Braemar Clubhouse Mon Apr 1 Regular CounciliMeeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Mon Apr 15 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Mon Apr 22 Board of Review 5:00 p.m. Council Room Tues Apr 23 Annual Volunteers Reception 5:00 p.m. Edinborough Pa Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Association of Minne P. O. Box 38036 Minneapolis, MN 55438 612 - 943 -2769 CFS A syndrome characterized by persistent, incapacitating fatigue January 21, 1991 I thank you in advance for your assistance in the recognition of CFS as a serious health concern in Edina and our state. We look forward to meeting you in March. Sincerely, Judy Bitsso President Enclosures The Honorable Fred Richards Honorary Member Mayor of Edina of the Board 4801 W. 50th St. Gov. Rudy Perpich Edina; Minnesota 55424 Board Of Directors Judy Basso; President Dear Mayor Richards, Brian Lutterman, Vice President Penny Crandall, I am writing on behalf of our members in y request y g your city, t0 r UBSt thet OU 1SSUe 81 Treasurer. official proclamation which designates March 3 - 9, 1991 as Chronic Fatigue JulieeCKlott Bach, Syndrome Awareness Week in Edina. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS), a poorly Karalee Beierschmitt understood disorder, was officially defined by the Centers for Disease Control is John Seagard 1988. In cooperation with the National Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Association, Jean Cole Bill LaVictoire organizations such as ours across the county are contacting their Y g government Helen Ahlbrecht officials addressing the need for increased understanding of this recently Medical Advisors recognized.and debilitating disease. The National CFS Association has encourage Allan C. Kind, us to request that the first week in March be established in communities across M.D. Phillip K. Peterson, Minnesota for CFS awareness. M.D. Christian G. Schrock, I have enclosed information about CFS for your review, including a sample CFS proclamation for your consideration. According to a University of Minnesota Nurse ate researcher, approximately 28Z of people with CFS are vocationally disabled. T R.N. loss to society of talented and highly motivated individuals, many of whom are stricken by CFS in their 30's, is great. Advisors Linda Beierschmitt, A.A. In addition to my request that you issue a CFS proclamation, I would also like to Terrie Cummings, R.N., B.S.N. invite you t0 p g g yo Y present it to our members at an u cumin meeting to be held in i `Richard Kofsky, city, and which will be open to the general public. We would be honored to have Ph.D.. L.C.P. Beth van den Berg, your participation in our first public event intended to heighten awareness of P P P g B.S., O.T.R. CFS. This celebration will be held from i -4pm, Sunday, March 3, at Southdale Hennepin County Library, 7001 York Avenue South, in Edina. Please contact me if you need any additional information concerning either request'. I thank you in advance for your assistance in the recognition of CFS as a serious health concern in Edina and our state. We look forward to meeting you in March. Sincerely, Judy Bitsso President Enclosures Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Association of Minnes P. O. Box 38036 Minneapolis, MN 55438 612 - 943 -2769 CFS A syndrome characterized by persistent, incapacitating fatigue Honorary Member of the Board Gov. Rudy Perpich Board Of Directors Judy Basso, President Brian Lutterman, Vice President Penny Crandall, Treasurer Julie Klotzbach, Secretary Karalee Beierschmitt John Seagard Jean Cole Bill LaVictoire Helen Ahlbrecht Medical Advisors Allan C. Kind, M.D. Phillip K. Peterson, M.D. Christian G. Schrock, M.D. Nurse Advocate Jeri Stroud, R.N. Advisors Linda Beierschmitt, A.A. Terrie Cummings, R.N., B.S.N. Richard Kofsky, Ph.D., L.C.P. Beth van den Berg, B.S., O.T.R. Sample Proclamation for Mayors City of , Minnesota Proclamation Whereas: Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) is a recently defined illness characterized by incapacitating fatigue and weakness, an array of flu -like symptoms and cognitive problems, and; Whereas: These symptoms may last for many months or years, are often severely debilitating, and most often affect people under the age of 45, and: Whereas: As not all physicians are familiar with CFS, many times it is incorrectly diagnosed because the symptoms appear similiar to other illnesses, and; Whereas: An important part of our workforce and society is affected by CFS and proper treatment for the illness is not well - defined, and; Whereas: It is important that we build a greater knowledge and awareness of CFS, and increase research funding, in order to help the significant number of Americans who suffer from this syndrome: Now, Therefore, \1, , Mayor of Minnesota, do hereby proclaim the week of March 3 -9, 1991 as CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME AWARENESS WEEK in , Minnesota, to increase understanding of CFS in our community. MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FEBRUARY 19, 1991 ROL CALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Chairman Richards. HRA CONSENT ITEMS ADOPTED' Motion was made by Commissioner Kelly and was seconded by Commissioner Smith to approve and adopt the BRA consent items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice; Smith, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF FEBRUARY'4, 1991 APPROVED Motion was made by Commissioner Belly and was seconded by Commissioner Smith to approve the HRA Minutes of the meeting of February 4, 1991. Motion carried on rollcall vote. *CLAIMS'PAID motion was made by Commissioner Kelly and was seconded by Commissioner Smith to approve payment of the following HRA claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated 2/19/91 and consisting of one page.totaling $166,103.7=3. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chairman Richards declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director . 1991 CITY OF EDINA HRA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 032700 02/14/91 14,166.67 14,166.67 * * * * ** 046701 02/15/91 4,222.00 4,222.00 * * * * ** 18,388.67 18,388.67 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION PARTNERS /SR COMM INTEREST ALDO' INC PHASE 4 FUND 01 TOTAL FUND HRA TOTAL 02 -19 -91 PAGE 1 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 01- 4302 - 133 -12 MANUAL * ** -CKS 01- 1315 - 132 -12 MANUAL * ** -CKS APPROVW FOR PAYMlm mac. ftVMWM DOW PAOs -- —. iHRp{�k HRA Claims (Received 3/4/91) 1991 CITY OF EDINA HRA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 063700 03/01/91 14,166.67 PARTNERS FOR SR PAYMENT 14,166.67 * 063701 03/01/91 179.95 TAMARACK PARK MAINT AREA 179.95 * 063702 03/01/91 2,325.00 HAGEN COMP PARK MAINT AREA 2,325.00 * 063703 03/01/91 9,826.27 WALKER PARK CONSULT ENGNEERING FEES 063703 03/01/91 79.29 WALKER PARK CONSULT ENG FEES 9,905.56 * 063704 03/01/91 500.00 MN VALLEY LSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS 500.00 * 063705 03/01/91 8,413.68 METRO ELECTRIC PARK CONSTRTN 8,413.68 * 063706 03/01/91 26,029.65 BLAINE HTG.AIR PARK CONSTRTN 26,029.65 * 063707 03/01/91 14,347.22 BRW INC ARCH FEES 063707 03/01/91 111.97 BRW INC ARCH FEES 063707 03/01/91 1,126.43 BRW INC ARCH FEES 15,585.62 * 063708 03/01/91 4,552.00 DISCOM OF MN RADIOS 4,552.00 * 063709 03/01/91 1,005.00 CLEAN FLO LAB INDIANHEAD LK TREAT 063709 03/01/91 1,005.00- CLEAN FLO LAB INDIANHEAD LK TREAT .00 * 063710 03/01/91 219.00 GEPHART ELECTRIC PARK IMPROVEMENTS 063710 03/01/91 219.00- GEPHART ELECTRIC PARK IMPROVEMENTS .00 * 063711 03/01/91 23,108.00 TC CONSTRUCTION PARK CENTRUM 23,108.00 * 063712 03/01/91 270.00 JACKSON LANDSCAPE RES IMPROVEMENTS 270.00 * 063713 03/01/91 2,275.00 WITZEL TREE MOVING RES IMPROVEMENTS 2,275.00 * 063714 03/01/91 2,940.00 NORDQUIST SIGN CO RES IMPROVEMNT 2,940.00 * 063715 03/01/91 1,520.00 PLYMOUTH DRYWELL RES IMPROVEMNT 1,520.00 * kkkkkk 111,771.13 FUND 01 TOTAL FUND HRA 03 -04 -91 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 01- 4302 - 133 -12 01- 1390 - 132 -12 140606 01 -1390- 132 -12 378 01 =1319- 131 -12 66485 01- 1319 - 131 -12 66442 01- 1315 - 132 -12 9072A 01- 1390 - 132 -12 01- 1390 - 132 -12 01- 1319 - 131 -12 61216 01- 1319 - 132 -12 61298 01- 1319 - 132 -12 53936A 01- 1340 - 132 -12 82652 351 10- 4201 - 358 -30 5568 10- 4201 - 358 -30 5568 01- 1390 - 133 -12 13072 01- 1390 - 133 -12 13072 01- 1390 - 132 -12 01- 1315- 132 -12 1860 382 01- 1315 - 132 -12 01- 1315 - 132 -12 12437 01- 1315- 132 -12 1 * * * -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA HRA CHECK REGISTER 03 -04 -91 PAGE 2 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 111,771.13 TOTAL MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JANUARY 7, 1991 . ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly. OATHS OF OFFICE TAKEN The oath of office as Council Member was administered by the City Clerk to Jack Rice, and Glenn L. Smith who had been elected for four year terms to January 1, 1995. APPOINTMENT OF MAYOR PRO -TEM Member Rice made a motion to appoint Member Kelly as Mayor Pro -Tem. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly Motion carried. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Member Paulus, and was seconded by Member Rice to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly Motion carried. PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR BELFRY ADDITION DENIED UPON ADOPTION OF FINDINGS OF FACT Planner Larsen presented Findings, Decision, and Reasons in support for denial of the application of Richard Belfry for the subdivision of Lot 67, Morningside, in response to Council action of December 17, 1990. Copies of the Findings have been delivered to Peter Bachman, attorney for Mr. Belfry, with a copy by mail to Mr. Belfry. A copy of the Findings were also delivered to Annette Christianson, 4247 Grimes Avenue South, the contact person for the neighborhood. Planner Larsen noted that.neither Mr., Belfry or Mr. Bachman,,his attorney, were present and recommended that the opening recital paragraph be amended to indicate that they were present on December 17,1990, but not on January 7, 1991. Member Smith suggested that the opening paragraph be further amended to indicate that copies of the Findings, Decision, and Reasons had been sent to Mr. Belfry and Mr. Bachman prior to the meeting. He also noted a misspelled word on line six of page five '- "wold" should be "would ". Member Smith made a motion that the Findings, Decision, and Reasons document be amended to reflect the suggested changes. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly Motion carried. Mayor Pro -Tem then called for public comment on the draft Findings, Decisions, and Reasons in support of denial of the proposed subdivision. No public comment or objections were heard. Member Smith made a motion to adopt the Findings, Decision, and Reasons as amended (copy attached) and to deny the application of Richard Belfry for the subdivision of Lot 67, Morningside. Motion to adopt the Findings was seconded by Member Rice. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly Motion carried. LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR 6610 AND 6620 NORMANDALE ROAD (ENGS_TROM MARNIE ADDITION Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute various separate parcels: Parcel A - Lot 1, Block 1, ENGSTROM MARNIE ADDITION v Parcel B - That part of Government Lot 3, Section 4, Township 116, Range 21, described as follows: Beginning at a point 230 feet South of North line and 117 feet West of East,line of said Government Lot 3, in said Section 4, said point of beginning being in West line of right of way of State Trunk Highway No. 100; thence South parallel with East line of said Section 4, a distance of 200 feet, thence West parallel with North line of Government Lot 3, a distance of 350 feet, thence North parallel with East line of said Section 4 a distance of 200 feet thence East 350 feet to point of beginning; and WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to subdivide said'tracts into the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "Parcels "): Lot 1, Block 1, ENGSTROM MARNIE ADDITION, and the southerly 6 feet of Parcel B as described above and That part of Government Lot 3, Section 4, Township 116, Range 21, described as follows: Beginning at a point 230 feet South of North line and 117 feet West.of East line of said Government Lots 3, in said Section 4, said point of beginning being in West line of right of way of State Trunk Highway No. 100; thence South parallel with East line of said Section 4, a distance of 200 feet, thence West parallel with North line of Government Lot 3, a distance of 350 feet, thence North parallel with East line of said Section 4 a distance of 200 feet thence East 350 feet to point of beginning, except for the Southerly 6 feet thereof. WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinances Nos. 804 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by.the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 804 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Resolution adopted on rollcall vote, four ayes. LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR 5901 -5903 VIEW LANE (LOT 30. BLOCK 3. KILLARNEY SHORES Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land:. Lot 30, Block 3, KILLARNEY SHORES WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows: Description of Southerly Parcel: All that part of Lot 30, Block 3, KILLARNEY SHORES which lies southerly of a line drawn from a point on the westerly line of said Lot 30 distant 73.78 feet southeasterly of the northwest corner thereof to a point on the easterly line of said Lot 30 distant 92.19 feet southeasterly of the most northerly corner of said Lot 30. Description of Northerly Parcel: Lot 30, Block 3, KILLARNEY SHORES, except that part which lies Westerly of a line drawn from a point on the Northwesterly line of the above described tract distant 32.0 feet Northeasterly of the Northwest corner of said lot, to a point on the West line of said lot distant 26.0 feet Southeasterly of the Northwest corner of said lot as measured along said line. Also except that part which lies southerly of a line drawn from a point on the westerly line of said Lot 30 distant 73.78 feet southeasterly of the northwest corner thereof to a point on the easterly line of said Lot 30 distant 92.19 feet southeasterly, of the most northerly corner of said Lot 30. WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of.land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinances Nos. 804 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 804 and' Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made.of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval.of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Resolution adopted on rollcall vote, four ayes. HEARING DATE OF 01/22/91 SET FOR VARIOUS PLANNING MATTERS Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Rice setting January 22, 1991, as hearing date for the following Planning matters: 1) Conditional Use Permit - Building Expansion - Hennepin County Library - 7001 York Avenue 2) Temporary Conditional Use Permit - Home Occupation - Dr. Joyce Anderson - 7121 Glouchester Avenue 3) Preliminary Plat Approval - Farrells Parkwood Knolls — Tract A, R.L.S. 1286 - 5700 Blake Road. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. COUNCIL TO REVIEW AND RESPOND TO MASSING SURVEY Planner Larsen presented a massing survey that had been prepared for the Council to review of 21 single family homes-'which are spread throughout the community. Included are examples of new.construction on new lots or previously vacant lots, old homes that have been removed and new.homes built in their place, additions and major remodelings that have occurred recently. Staff is having difficulty addressing the problem of massing and has looked exhaustively at various other approaches to further restrictions, including what other communities have done. For example, in Lake Forest, Illinois, they were .attacking a different problem (massive houses built in former fields that were not softened by mature trees and landscaping). With the variety of development and lot sizes in Edina, every approach staff has considered seems to fall apart as soon as you move from one neighborhood to.the next. Planner Larsen explained that the homes in the survey are not necessarily examples of good or bad development on which to make judgements, but are cases on which staff would like to get individual Council reaction and how they relate to the rules now in place. It is hoped that, through a consensus, the Council may be able to identify any particular problems and in what specific areas those might be. Staff anticipates that the survey review will be a 2 -3 week process.. Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly said she hoped the Council would be able;to review a few of the houses in the survey so that there could be some philosophic discussion on the massing issue at the Council Work Session scheduled for January 12. I -494 CORRIDOR COMIIISSION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT APPROVED Planner Larsen explained that the I -494 Corridor Commission Joint Powers Organization (JPO) needs staff help in developing Travel Demand Management (TDM) strategies leading to a TDM Ordinance to be adopted by all five cities. The JPO has recommended hiring a half -time individual for one year to develop the TDM program at a total cost of $15,000. Fifty percent of the cost will be covered by a Metropolitan Council grant and the remaining $7,500 is within the JPO budget. Member Paulus introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that it hereby approves the Professional Services Agreement recommended by the I -494 Corridor Commission Joint Powers Organization, BE IT FURTHER resolved that the Mayor and Manager hereby are authorized and directed to execute the Agreement on behalf of.the City. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly Resolution adopted. SEVER BACKUP CLAIM OF RICHARD MILLER, 5340 HOLLYWOOD ROAD, ACKNOWLEDGED: MATTER CONTINUED TO 1122/91 IF NOT RESOLVED.Manager Rosland directed the Council's attention to a notice of claim for residence sewer backup at 5340 Hollywood Road, dated December 10, 1990, and a subsequent letter dated January 3, 1991, from Richard R. Miller, the property owner, with additional information. The claim was referred to the City's insurance company who denied the claim.. Manager Rosland stated that staff would like to review the facts and would recommend that the matter be continued to January 22, 1991, unless it is resolved prior to then. Richard Miller, 5340 Hollywood Road, was present and agreed to the continuation of the matter. Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly asked that the record acknowledge receipt of Mr. Miller's letter of January 3, 1991. *BID AWARDED FOR CASCADE WELL SEALING PROJECT Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for water well sealing project Cascade Well, to recommended low bidder, Bergerson- Caswell, at .$5,990.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR SNOW PLOW AND WING Notion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for one snow plow and wing to recommended low bidder, Little Falls Machine, Inc., at $7.125.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. BID AWARDED FOR SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION AT 6809 NORNANDALE ROAD (HC -12): CONNECTION CHARGES TO BE LEVIED AGAINST PROPERTY Manager Rosland explained that a house has been moved onto the property at 6809 Normandale Road and the owner has requested the sanitary sewer connection. The property owner, Ronald L. Carlson, has made two digs and has been unable to locate the connection. He has asked for some relief from the City. Manager Rosland pointed out that the City's policy has been and continues to be that.the property owner must bear the Cost of water and sewer connection to the tap in the street. The relief offered by the City would be to order the work for the sanitary sewer connection and assess the cost of the project against the property for six years at 9% interest. In order for the project to be assessed, the owner must sign an easement, petition, waiver and release form. Ronald L. Carlson, 6809 Normandale Road, presented written background information on his request that the City should: 1) Provide the lateral sewer connection ( #171) to the property line at no additional cost to the property owner because these assessments have been paid. 2) Waive the requirement of an "air test" of the pipe to the building so as to expedite completion of the work and reduce cost to-the property owner. 3) Reimburse the property owner an estimated $3,827.00 for added expense due to the frost season and unproductive digs. Member Paulus commented that any additional cost may be the responsibility of the seller of the property if the seller had represented to Mr. Carlson that the assessments had been paid and,the connections were readily available. Further discussion and questions relating to the request of the property owner followed. Member Smith then made a motion for award of bid for sanitary sewer connection at 6809 Pormandale Road to lofr bidder, Hopkins Plumbing & Heating Company, at $3,710.00, subject to the property owner signing an easement, petition, waiver and release form. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Paulus; Rice, Smith, Kelly Motion carried. Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption, subject to the property owner signing an easement, petition, waiver and release form: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as'follows: 1. It is hereby found and determined that a petition has been filed requesting the Council to construct sanitary sewer improvement connection at 6809 Normandale Road and to assess the entire cost -of the improvement against the property of the petitioner, and that said petition has been signed by all owners of real property where said improvement is to be located. 2. The making of said improvement in accordance with said petition is hereby ordered pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.031(3), (Session Laws of 1961, Chapter 525, Section 1). Said improvement is hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as follows: SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION NO. HC -12 The entire cost of said improvement is hereby ordered to be assessed against the property.(PIN 30- 028 -24 -33 -0094) described as follows: Lot 9 except Hwy, NORMANDALE TERRACE where said improvement is to be located. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Rice. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly Resolution adopted. *BID AWARDED FOR CODIFICATION OF ORDINANCES lotion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for codification of ordinances to recommended bidder, LMC - CLEAR Codification Services, at $5,876.00, plus $28/hr for new material. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. H.R.A. COMMISSIONERS APPOINTED Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded�� by Member Rice for consent of Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly's appointment of the following Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority commissioners: Bernard G. Rice, Jr. 01/02/95, Glenn L. Smith 01/02/95 Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. SOLID WASTE SOURCE REDUCTION PLAN APPROVED Manager Rosland informed the Council that in order to remain eligible for recycling funding from Hennepin County, cities must have a solid waste source reduction plan. He stated that Janet Chandler, Recycling Coordinator, has drafted a proposed plan which lists current City policies which minimize waste, and recommends additional practices to reduce waste. Member Rice introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Edina, Minnesota, that it hereby approves the Solid haste Source'Reduction Plan for the City of Edina, dated 01/03/91 and as presented by the Recycling Coordinator. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith,,Kelly Resolution adopted. EXPENDITURE OF FORFEITURE MONIES CONTINUED TO JANUARY 22, 1991 MEETING Manager Rosland advised the Council that forfeiture money has been accumulated over the last several years to a sum of slightly over $40,000. Guidelines for its expenditure are quite specific. The Council was referred to a memorandum dated January 3, 1991 from Chief Craig Swanson wherein he recalled that during the 1991 budget hearings, drug forfeiture funds were mentioned as a way of funding new equipment and programs that would enhance police efficiency. Chief Swanson would recommend the planned expenditures of forfeiture funds as listed in his memorandum. Member Smith made a motion to continue the approval of expenditures of forfeiture monies to the meeting of January 22, 1991, when all Council Members would be present. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith Nays: Kelly Motion carried. EXCUSED ABSENCES POLICY TO BE DRAFTED FOR ADVISORY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS Manager Rosland referred to a letter dated November 14, 1990, from Robert Christianson, Chair of the Park Board, requesting an exception to the attendance policy in order that a board member can continue to serve. The current ordinance provides that any member of an advisory board, commission or committee who fails to attend three consecutive meetings or who fails to attend any four meetings in twelve months may be removed from office by the Mayor with the consent of the Council. Manager Rosland suggested that in some cases there may be extenuating circumstances regarding absences which should be taken into consideration. Member Smith made a motion directing staff to draft an excused absence policy for advisory board and commissions, to be handled at the board /commission level, to be brought back for Council consideration. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. In discussing the motion, Member Rice said he would not be in favor of a general excused absence policy because there would be the potential for abuse and, even though there may be unavoidable circumstances that cause a member to miss a meeting, he strongly felt it important that all members be in attendance. To have this handled at the board /commission level would put the chairs in a difficult position. Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly said she agreed with Member Rice but felt that there may be an exception in certain cases. Member Smith said a policy would give members an expectation as to exceptions. Manager Rosland explained that the policy.he was suggesting would include notification of the absence to the chair of the board or commission, concurrence of the chair, and then to the Mayor for approval, with the consent of the Council. Member Paulus said she felt a letter should be sent to the chair of boards and commissions advising them of the policy and asking them to notify the Council if they foresee an attendance problem. Member Rice suggested that, if there are circumstances whereby a member will miss several consecutive meetings, the member should consider resigning and requesting reappointment after the situation is cleared up. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly Motion carried. FINANCIAL HEALTH PROFILE FOR CITY OF EDINA REVIEWED Manager Rosland presented a summary, as requested by the Council, of the Financial Health Profile for the City of Edina compiled by the Minnesota Office of.the State Auditor. Current expenditures per capita for year end 1989 for Edina showed a total of $339.52 as compared with Minneapolis at $885.61 (highest City) and Brooklyn Park at $261.38 (lowest City). Revenues per capita showed a total of $462.59 for Edina (lowest city) as compared with Minneapolis at $1159.21 (highest City). The figures indicate that the City.of Edina functions very inexpensively in relationship to other cities in the metropolitan area It was the consensus of the Council that the citizens of Edina should be made aware of this information and that it be included in the About Town publication. VACANCY ON LNG BOARD OF DIRECTORS NOTED Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly noted that there is a vacancy on the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) Board of Directors. The LMC'Board will consider appointing a new board member to fill an unexpired term at its January meeting. Manager Rosland said that a list of the current board was included in the Council packets and if any member of the Council would like to submit his/her name for appointment, staff would assist in that procedure. *RESOLUTION ADOPTED DESIGNATING DEPOSITORIES FOR PUBLIC FONDS OF CITY Motion was madeiby Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the -following resolution: RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DEPOSITORIES BE IT RESOLVED that the First Bank National Association, Minneapolis, MN, Americana State Bank of Edina, Edina, MN, Southwest Fidelity State Bank, Edina, MN, Marquette Bank Minneapolis, Minneapolis, MN and Norwest Bank MetroWest; Edina, MN, authorized to do banking business in Minnesota, be and hereby are designated as Official Depositories for the Public Funds of the City of Edina, County of Hennepin, Minnesota, until January 1, 1992. Resolution adopted on rollcall vote, four ayes. *SIGNATORY RESOLUTION ADOPTED Notion was made by Member Paulus and'was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the following resolution: SIGNATORY RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED that the persons holding office as Mayor, Manager and Treasurer of the City of Edina, be, and they hereby are, authorized to act for this municipality in the transaction,of any banking business with First Bank National Association, Americana State Bank of Edina, Southwest Fidelity State Bank, Marquette Bank Minneapolis and Norwest Bank Metrogest (hereinafter referred to as the "Bank ") from time to time and until written notice to any Bank to the contrary, to sign checks against said accounts, which checks will be signed by the Mayor, Manager and City Treasurer. Each Bank is hereby authorized and directed to honor and pay any checks against such account if signed as above described, whether or not said check is, payable to the order of, or deposited to the credit of, any officer or officersiof the City, including the signer or signers of the check. Resolution adopted on rollcall vote, four ayes. *FACSIMILE SIGNATURES RESOLUTION ADOPTED Notion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION ADOPTED AUTHORIZING USE OF FACSIMILE SIGNATURES BY PUBLIC OFFICIALS RESOLVED that the use of facsimile signatures by the following named persons: FREDERICK S. RICHARDS - MAYOR RSNNETH E. ROSLAND - CITY MANAGER JOHN VALLIN - CITY TREASURER on checks, drafts, warrants, warrant - checks, vouchers or other orders of public funds deposited in First. Bank National Association, Americana State Bank of Edina, Southwest Fidelity State Bank, Marquette Bank Minneapolis and Norwest Bank MetroWest, be and hereby is approved, and that each of said named persons may authorize said depository banks to honor any.such instrument bearing his facsimile signature in such form as he may designate and to charge the same to the account in said depository bank upon which drawn as fully as though it bore his manually written signature and that instruments so honored shall be wholly operative and binding in favor of said depository bank although such facsimile signature shall have been affixed without his authority. Motion carried on rollcall vote; four ayes. I- 494/169 LAND ACQUISITION COUNTER OFFER APPROVED Manager Rosland recalled that at the meeting of December 17, 1990, the Council had authorized staff to make .a purchase offer of $200,000 for acquisition of the vacant land at the northeast quadrant of I -494 and Highway 169. The Metropolitan Federal Bank has responded that they would accept $375,000 with no contingencies, warranties, or liabilities to'the bank. Staff would recommend that the City counter with an offer of $290,000. The City's offer was, conditioned upon the seller paying all specials estimated at $50,000 which is a factor for them. Member Rice said that he was most concerned about environmental issues. Planner - Larsen responded that a Stage I environmental, assessment on the property has been done which concluded that a Stage II assessment is not required. Staff is in the process of reviewing the assessment and that warranty would not be bargained away. Member Paulus made a motion that the City make a counter offer of up to $290,000 with the understanding that the seller would pay all special assessments, and that the Mayor and Manager be authorized to execute the purchase agreement if the offer is accepted. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly Motion carried. (Member Rice left the meeting at this point on the agenda) HENNEPIN COUNTY REPORT ^IS THE SHARE FAIR" DISCUSSED: RESOLUTION ADOPTED IN SUPPORT OF COUNTY'S.POSITION ON FISCAL DISPARITIES Manager Rosland referred to a report from Hennepin County entitled "Is The Share Fair" which speaks to the Fiscal Disparities Program. He said that under the program a great deal of commercial /industrial property value in taxes is transferred out of Edina and also out of Hennepin County which results in higher property taxes to Edina residents. Because the Hennepin County Board is concerned about the recent growth in the Fiscal Disparities program, it has taken the position that the size of the tax base contribution pool should be limited to its 1991 level of $291 Million and has asked the Council to adopt a resolution supporting the County's legislative initiative. Manager Rosland recommended that the Council support the County's position.. Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly noted that the Edina school district also suffers through the Fiscal Disparities Program. Member Smith said the County's proposal to lower the target is not the greatest solution and that, personally, he would rather support doing away with the program. Manager Rosland suggested that could be conveyed in the cover letter. Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Fiscal Disparities Program was enacted by the 1971 Legislature and implemented in 1975, WHEREAS, the goal of Fiscal Disparities'is to allow all communities in the metro region to share in the region's growth, regardless of where that growth occurs, WHEREAS, the growth of the Fiscal Disparities pool is tied directly to the growth of commercial /industrial property value in the metro area, WHEREAS, about two- thirds of the pool comes from inflation on properties that have had no physical development since the program was enacted, WHEREAS, about 75% of all municipal tax base losses in 1991 were experienced by cities in Hennepin County, WHEREAS, approximately $7 million of commercial /industrial property value in taxes is transferred out of the City of Edina requiring higher property taxes as a result of Fiscal Disparities, WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners has endorsed a proposal to limit the size of the tax base contribution pool to its 1991 level of $291 billion by adjusting the contribution rate; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that it hereby supports the position of the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners and urges the Legislature to consider limiting the size of the tax base contribution pool as proposed. Motion for adoption of the resolution.was seconded by Member Paulus. Charles.Hansing, 4741 Hibiscus Avenue, commented that in Minnesota the property taxes for commercial property is too high. If the rates for commercial went down the fiscal disparities would be less and less and would force local governments to address expenses. Manager Rosland responded that the-City of,Edina has been leading the cause over the past ten years with regard to the homestead credit, fiscal disparities and local government aids. Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly then called for rollcall vote on the motion: Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Smith, Kelly Resolution adopted. *CLAIMS PAID Notion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Rice for to approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated 01/01/91 and consisting of 17 pages: General Fund $53,818.28, Communications $32,345.93, Art Center $3,126.50, Capital Fund $3,182.15, Swimming Pool Fund $4,598.75, Golf Course Fund $87,557.01, Recreation Center Fund $860.41, Edinborough Park $4,015.83, Utility Fund $235,664.44, Storm Sewer Utility $298.86, Liquor Dispensary Fund $2,165.48, Construction Fund $1,274.14, TOTAL $425,907.78. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, motion of Member Paulus was seconded by Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly for adjournment and carried unanimously. Adjournment at 9:22 p.m. City Clerk f MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JANUARY 22, 1991 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus,, Rice, Smith and Mayor Richards.. BOY SCOUT TROOP NO. 48'WELCOMED Mayor Richards welcomed members of Boy Scout Troop No. 48 from Calvary Lutheran Church in Edina. Mike Sebek, Assistant Scoutmaster said that they were working on merit badges for citizenship in the community and nation. Member Smith introduced Don Schlaefer, Scoutmaster. NATIONAL SCHOOL COUNSELING WEER PROCLAIMED Mayor Richards presented the following proclamation which was unanimously adopted: PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, school counselors are employed in public, private and parochial schools to ..help students reach their full potential as human beings, WHEREAS, counseling is an essential part of the educational process for students as they adjust to our very complex society, WHEREAS, school counselors are concerned with students being better able to understand themselves, their abilities, strengths and talents as they relate to career development and awareness, WHEREAS, school counselors acknowledge the potential and importance of every student, and believe every student possesses the capability and deserves the right to learn, WHEREAS, school counselors endeavor to provide all students with the educational, psychological and interpersonal skills necessary to enhance their learning experience, WHEREAS, school counselors help parents to focus on ways to facilitate the positive educational, personal and social growth of their children, NOW THEREFORE, I, Frederick S. Richards as Mayor of the City of Edina, do hereby proclaim the week of February 3rd as SCHOOL COUNSELING WEEK IN EDINA and urge all Edina residents to become more aware of the important role of school counselors in the education of our students. Accepting the proclamation was Janet Eian, Executive Director of the Sylvan Learning Center in Bloomington, along with Mr. Don Seline, Counselor at Valley View Junior High School, with a brief explanation of how Counselors benefit the youth of Edina. AMERICAN HISTORY MONTH PROCLAIMED Mayor Richards introduced the following proclamation which was unanimously adopted: AN" CAN HISTORY MONTH PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, the National Society Daughters of the American Revolution sponsors February as American History Month each year; and WHEREAS, to stimulate a knowledge in both young and old and a 'sense of pride in our nation's great achievements and dedication to liberty; and WHEREAS, to stress pride in the United States of America through community services in educational programs, essay contests and historic tours; and WHEREAS, through the study of American History, we are made aware of the importance of Freedom, Equality,,Justice and Humanity in all our lives today; and WHEREAS, the. importance of remembering American History should be duly noted; NOW, THEREFORE, I Frederick S. Richards, as Mayor of the City of Edina, do hereby proclaim the month of February to be AMERICAN HISTORY MONTH in the City of Edina and urge all Edina. residents to join with me this month in recognising the-importance - -of American --History in our lives., CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED,_ Motion-,was made- by Member Kelly and- was�;seconded by tI Member Smith to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented with the exception of removal of item V.0 - Award of Bid for One Ton Pickup Truck with Snow Plow Unit. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF 10/15/90, 11/5/90 AND YEAR END MEETING OF 12/27/90 APPROVED Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith to approve the minutes of the regular meetings of October 15, 1990, and November 5, 1990, and the Year End Meeting of December 27, 1990. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED ON ISSUANCE OF A TEMPORARY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR DR. JOYCE ANDERSON, 7121 GLOUCHESTER AVENUE. FOR HOME OCCUPATION DENIED ' Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved, and ordered placed on file. Planner Craig Larsen gave background information regarding the application for a temporary conditional use permit for home occupation by Dr. Joyce Anderson, 7121 Glouchester Avenue. On November 19, 1990, the Council gave final approval to a zoning ordinance amendment providing for a conditional use permit for home occupations by persons that were handicapped. The first application under the new permit process has been received from Dr. Anderson who initiated the process to have the ordinance amendment adopted. The application included the required physician's letter and described generally the scope of her counseling business; i.e. hours and day of the week of operation and that the total client visits would be limited to 20 per week. The only variance from the home occupation requirement of the ordinance that is being requested is the increase of non - resident vehicle trips from 10 per week to 20. The general requirements of Sec. 4, Paragraph D.5 of the Zoning Ordinance requires that the Council make the following findings before granting a Conditional Use Permit: a) will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals and general welfare b) will not cause undue traffic hazards, congestion or parking shortages; C) will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment, or decrease the value, of other property in the vicinity, and will not be a nuisance; d) will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of other property in the vicinity; e) will not create an excessive burden on parks, streets and other public facilities; f) conforms to the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the district in which it is located at imposed by this ordinance; and g) is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Planner Larsen stated that the application was considered by the Community Development and Planning Commission at its January 2, 1991, meeting and approval of the Temporary Conditional Use Permit was recommended, subject to the condition that client visits be limited to 20 per week. Member Paulus questioned a sentence in the Planning Commission draft minutes which stated that the permit runs with the property, not occupant. Planner Larsen said the minutes were in error and should read that the permit would run,with the occupancy. Mayor Richards noted receipt of the following correspondence supporting the request of Dr. Anderson for a Temporary Conditional Use Permit: Kay and Lee Wicktrom, 7101 Glouchester Dr.; Lucille Williamson, 7129 Glouchester Av.; Alice and Robert Kravig, 7117 Glouchester Av.; and Victoria J. and J.E. Reichardt, 7109 Glouchester-Av: In opposition to the granting of the Permit, Bus & Pauline Mertes, 7133 Cornelia Dr.; Joan C. and Paul S. Wehrmeister, 7113 Cornelia Dr.; D. Glen Whitesell, 7116 Heatherton Tr.; Mr. & Mrs. Michael J. Patera, 7120 Glouchester Av.; and an unsigned letter from a Heatherton Tr. homeowner. Mayor Richards then called for public comment on the request for a Temporary Conditional Use Permit. Glen Whitesell, 7116 Heatherton Trail, questioned what a temporary conditional use permit is compared to a conditional use permit and what brought about the Council reviews. Planner Larsen explained that in this case the word temporary means that it runs for the duration, of the condition as long as it is certified by her doctor, and subject to periodic review by the City Council as opposed to a conditional use permit that runs with the land. The Ordinance provides that the permit would be reviewed.on the first anniversary of.the granting of the . permit, with- reviewal every two years after that. Byron Richards, 7121 Heatherton Trail, stated that for the record he opposed the permit. No further comment being heard, Mayor Richards declared the public hearing closed and asked for comment and action by the Council. Mayor Richards asked the applicant, Dr. Anderson if she maintained an office outside of her home. Dr. Anderson replied she has a timeshare office, at Centennial Lakes Office Building which she uses approximately two hours per week for any patients in wheelchairs. In response to questions of Member Smith, Planner Larsen stated that hours could be imposed as a condition of the permit. There would be a periodic review of the permit to see if the conditions were being adhered to and if complaints were received in the interim they would be investigated. If violations were apparent, it would be handled as any other ordinance and would be subject to hearing and possible revocation of the permit. The requested 20 client trips per week would mean 20 automobile trips per week would be allowed. Member Rice asked if this would mean no overlapping of appointments. Planner Larsen said the permit would allow that to happen provided that the overall client trips in a given week did not exceed 20, and provided the other performance standards were met, e.g. vehicles must be accommodated in the driveway. Member Rice recalled that Dr. Anderson had agreed to that policy if the permit were granted. Planner Larsen stated that was his recollection also. No relief from that requirement is being requested. Regarding the imposition of hours, Member Paulus noted that the application does not state hours or days of operation. Because this is a residential neighborhood she said she would like to see the hours stated so as to make the least amount of impact on the neighborhood. Member Smith suggested that the hours for the home occupation be restricted from 9:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Mayor Richards commented that he could find no valid reason to support the Planning Commission's recommendation to issue a Temporary Conditional Use Permit. While we struggle to maintain the single family residential neighborhoods the other side of the coin is to enable everyone,to function in a productive manner. He said that the facts do not support an exception in this case and that he has not been persuaded that Dr. Anderson cannot otherwise function in a normal productive life. Further, Dr. Anderson has not shown that the standards and criteria of Sec. 4, D.S, will be met. Mayor Richards said that he supported the ordinance that would allow a person to conduct a business or profession out of the home-in certain situations but that he -could not support this application, for -the:., reasons, stated.. Member Rice: commented. - ::that he felt.- -the :questions- relative7. to- traffic- and.:_ neighborhood safety have been addressed by the ordinance and that he would support issuance of a Temporary Conditional Use Permit, with no restrictions as to hours. Member Kelly made a motion to grant a Temporary Conditional Use Permit to Dr. Joyce Anderson, 7121 Glouchester Avenue, subject to the condition that client visits be limited to 20 per week. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Member Smith moved that the motion be amended to add the following restrictions: that the days of operation be Monday through Friday from 9:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M. and client visits be limited to one hour with no overlapping appointments. Motion to amend was seconded by Member Paulus. Further comments were made by the Council Members.and additional testimony was given by Harold.Bagley, 7114 Glouchester, Dr. Joyce Anderson in support of her application to grant a Temporary Conditional Use Permit, and by Dr. Michael Glavan, 7124 Glouchester, in objection. Mayor Richards then called for a rollcall vote on the amendment to the main motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Smith Nays: Kelly, Rice, Richards Motion failed. Mayor Richards then called for a rollcall vote on the main motion on the floor. Rollcall: Ayes: Rice, Kelly Nays: Paulus, Smith, Richards Motion failed. Member Rice made a motion to grant a Temporary Conditional Use Permit to Dr. Joyce Anderson at 7121 Glouchester Avenue, subject to the following conditions: 1),that client visits be limited to 20 per week, 2) Hours restricted to 7:00 A.M. - 7:00 P.M., Monday through Saturday, and 3) No overlapping visits or street parking by clients. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall:, Ayes: Rice, Kelly Nays: Paulus, Smith, Richards Motion failed. Member Kelly asked that the - Temporary Conditional Use Permit Ordinance.be placed on the Council Agenda for the meeting of February 4, 1991, for further discussion. Dr. Anderson asked if she could continue seeing clients at her home until the meeting of February 4, 1991. Planner Larsen explained that up to 10 automobile trips per week is allowed under the Zoning Ordinance, regardless of any amendment. PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED ON CONDITIONAL USE PE MCET FOR HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY BUILDING EXPANSION: HEARING CONTINUED TO FEBRUARY 19, 1991 Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen explained that the Hennepin County Regional Library, located at 7001 York Avenue South, has applied for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for expansion of the public library portion of the building. Presentation by Planner Presently, the library totals approximately 97,000 square feet, which includes the library, the court system and the Hennepin County service center. The existing library itself is 67,964 square feet and the courts /service center is 284882 square feet. The Conditional UseiPermit would allow the library portion to expand-by 15,246 square feet. The addition would occur.by pushing out the existing westerly steps =of- the building and by- filling in -a notch in the- northeast corner." The facade of the library, following expansion, would basically appear the same as today. Parking for the library is computed on 10 spaces plus 1 space for each 300 square feet of gross.floor area. Parking for the courts and service center would be computed as for any other government service, 5 spaces per 1000 square feet or 1 for 200. Total existing parking spaces are 425; total required with the expanded space for the library would be 430 spaces. Parking as proposed by this plan 'would provide a total of 502 spaces which would be constructed by pushing the present parking area, located north of the York Avenue access would provide a 10 foot setback, where the Zoning. Ordinance would require a 20 foot parking.setback. Accordingly, a 10' foot parking setback variance is requested. All other aspects of the'site development and expansion would conform to Zoning Ordinance requirements. As a normal- policy, green space would not be used for additional parking. However, after deliberation with the County, evaluating the ordinance, and in anticipating the multi -use character of this facility, staff felt that possibly code requirements were lower than they should be, The library remains convinced that this parking is necessary; that it is needed immediately during the expansion project and ultimately for the enlarged facility. The, Community Development and Planning Commission considered the Conditional Use Permit request at its meeting of January 2, 1991, and recommended approval including the requested 10 foot parking setback variance from York Avenue. Reasons stated bye the Planning Commission were: 1) that it was important that the public perceive this as an accessible use with convenient and adequate parking, 2) that the multi -use demand was not anticipated by the Zoning Ordinance, and 3) that there would be no significant impact to vehicle drivers on York Avenue as additional screening would be added along the westerly side of the parking area. Council Comment Member Smith said he did not feel that there would be adequate space for additional landscaping if the variance were granted. He also asked if the library had considered a parking ramp. Planner Larsen said that additional parking could be done more economically on the property as opposed to construction of a ramp. Also, without a variance, ramps are prohibited in this zoning district. Mayor Richards asked if the City could impose a- specific landscaping plan as a condition to granting the Conditional Use Permit. Planner Larsen responded that this could be done. I Member Rice commented that it is a lot harder topput land back into green space than to take it out. Although he would be in favor of granting the setback variance, he said he would not be in favor of allowing the library to construct the additional 33 parking spaces along York Avenue until a pressing need is demonstrated. Member Paulus said she was concerned that green space would be taken away, based on library staff observation that additional parking was needed and not on data had been collected. Further, that City staff had not conducted any parking counts to substantiate the need. Planner Larsen explained that intergovernmental professional courtesy was exercised on this. City staff did look at two things relative.to the additional 33 spaces: 1) a proof of parking.could be required that would allow the County to add those spaces if there was a demonstrated need in the future, or 2) eliminate the 33 spaces and allow the County to apply for a variance to install those spaces if there was a demonstrated need in the future. Nan Faust, member of the Planning Commission, stated that the commission had asked county staff to consider reviewing their return.book system so that parking spaces would not be used to only return books. Considerable discussion followed concernin&;,proof: of:: the: need for additional- parking, potential loss of green space if the setback variance were granted, and a returned books drop -off area. Raymond Johnson, Project Manager for the Hennepin County Library expansion project, commented that he understood the Council's concerns about the existing green space. He also said that the comments heard_at the Planning Commission meeting have been taken under advisement but were not included nor added to the scope of the project. Mr. Johnson said he felt that the Hennepin County Library Board would be responsive to the concerns of the Council but that he could not make any promises. Member Richards made a motion to continue the hearing to February 19, 1991, on the request for a Conditional Use Permit for the Hennepin County Library at 7001 York Avenue for building expansion so that City staff could work with the Library staff relative to designing a returned book drop -off area and revising the site plan to eliminate the need for a parking setback variance. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly,. Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING PRELIIIINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR FARRELLS PARKWOOD KNOLLS - TRACT A. R.L.S. 1286 - 5700 BLASE ROAD GRANTED Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved, and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen explained that on December 3, 1990, the Council heard but took no action on the subject subdivision. The proponents have since presented a modified three lot proposal on which they are, by letter dated January 11, 1991, requesting Council action. As modified, the preliminary plat, would require one variance, that being a four foot lot width variance for Lot one. Lot 3, which previously required a lot width variance, now complies with the neighborhood median lot width of 130 feet. The additional lot width came at the expense of rear yard area for Lot 2. Presentation by Proponent Linda Farrell, 5700 Blake Road, stated that they hoped their letter of January 11, 1991, clarified some of the issues that had been discussed at previous meetings and has addressed the concerns raised by the Council. The plan being presented represents a culmination of the ideas, issues and concerns of the Council, Planning Commission and the City Planner, is an appropriate use of their land does not negatively impact the neighborhood and meets the intent of the Zoning Ordinance. Mrs. Farrell commented, although change can be disconcerting, i.e. development of Bredesen Park, traffic signals on Vernon Avenue, regrading of Blake Road and adding sidewalks,.that with thoughtful planning each development has enhanced their neighborhood and Edina. Because they plan to live in the subdivision, they would hardly want to create a plan that would negatively impact them or their neighbors. Reference was made to two drawing that were submitted with the Farrell's letter. The first incorporated the minor changes in lot.line placement that the Council suggested. Lots 2 and 3 require no variances; Lot 1 requires a four foot lot width variance. The second drawing showed sample house pad sketches as required by the ordinance.. The house pad on Lot 2 has a 125 foot setback from South Knoll Drive which corresponds -to the setback of the Wurst house to the west. Mrs. Farrell said they agreed with the Council that restricting a home on Lot 2 to one level would protect.the integrity of the neighborhood. Lot 3 shows the 130 foot lot width suggested-by the Council and includes the 100 foot conservation easement along the pond. The preliminary plat drawing also lists the trees in the .proposed building site areas. Lot 1 is four feet narrower in width than the- "neighborhood median ", but does represent the "neighborhood average" lot width which is 126 feet. The four foot proposed variance represents only a 3% variance from the median on the Lot 1 width. The large size of the proposed new lots- should:. be., given- strong consideration: Mrs. Farrell concluded by commenting that approval of their proposed three lot subdivision would not set a precedent or be construed as an example for future subdivisions in Edina. The large lot sizes,.the unique topography and forestation, and the minimal variance percentage requested would make the subdivision both feasible and applicable to their property only. ° Public Comment Thomas Wurst, 6205 South Knoll Dride,.referred to the Farrell's letter dated January 11, 1991, and the drawing of the proposed subdivision and-made comments summarized as follows: 1) He had not contributed any ideas to the Farrell's, proposed plat. 2) Originally, he had agreed with a two lot subdivision (the lot for the existing residence and a lot similar to what•is now Lot 3). The Planning Commission denied a three lot subdivision, and approved a two lot subdivision. 3) The proposed house pad for Lot 2 is for illustrative purposes only and is not binding. One of his prime concerns was the forestation and there are now two new driveways proposed off of South Knoll Drive for Lots 1 and 2. 1 4) Although the 500 foot neighborhood, as defined by ordinance, consists of 45 residential lots, they are embraced in four different plats. Only one of those plats is to the west of Blake Road, which is contiguous to. proposed Lot 2 and Lot 3. The.lots to the east were platted to be in harmony with everything east of Blake Road. The lots west of Blake Road were platted to be in harmony with the Parkwood Knolls plat. Of the 45 lots, 60% or 27 do not meet ordinance requirements. However, only 8 of the,27 lots do not conform are in Parkwood Knolls. In summary, Mr. Wurst said that a three lot subdivision would not be 'in harmony with the rest of the area and would not constitute good planning. Bentley Smith, 6212 South Knoll Drive, stated that on South Knoll Drive west from Blake Road to just beyond View Lane had been polled and that, excluding the Farrells, all but one were opposed to the subdivision. Mayor Richards commented that letters had been received from Paul Joas, and from Carol S.'Mahony both iii opposition to this subdivision. Roger Post, 6204 South Knoll Drive, said this was the first time he had seen the plans for the proposed subdivision. If this is approved, his house would be just across from the proposed driveway for the existing house. He now looks out upon trees and a reasonably decent sight across the street. However, he recognized that the Farrells own the subject property and have the right to express their opinion and are trying to do so. It come down to a minor four foot variance,.the greatest impact will be on the Wursts, if the trees and shrubs are maintained. If the integrity and solidarity of the area are maintained, Mr. Post said he would not be against the subdivision. James Van Valkenberg, Attorney representing the Farrells, commented that the lot calculations for the 500 foot neighborhood are shown on the plat survey, including the lots laying east of Blake Road as well as those laying West of Blake Road. He reiterated that the proposed lots are substantial in size, and urged the Council to favorably consider the subdivision, with the four foot lot width variance for Lot 1. Council Comment e Mayor Richards asked Planner Larsen to review the proposal now before the Council for action and the recommendation of the Planning Commission. Planner Larsen explained that the three lot subdivision now presented has been modified from that which the Council considered on December 3, 19.90. Two actions were taken by the Community Development and Planning Commission. On August 29, 1990, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve a revised two lot subdivision. On September 26; 1990, the -Planning-, Commission- voted to- recommend..-denial., of. a revised - -three lot plat.. In response to questions from Member Kelly, Planner Larsen clarified that the three lot subdivision the Planning Commission had seen had a four foot lot variance for Lot 1 and a 22 foot lot width variance on Lot 3. The proposed house-on Lot 3 would have to meet the setback of the house to the south to meet the ordinance requirement, the ordinance does not prevent a house from being set back further. Engineer Hoffman responded that.no footage was taken from the Farrell property for Blake Road widening project as there was sufficient right of way. Member Rice questioned what is considered a one -story home, in terms of height in feet, if building height restrictions could be imposed on Lot 2, and what the wording "illustrative purposes only" meant regarding the sample house pad sketches. Planner Larsen responded that, typically, at the front it would be eight to ten feet from ground level to the eave line, and depending on the pitch of the roof, the total height could be from fifteen to twenty -five feet. Conditions could be imposed and enforced through a developer's agreement. The term "illustrative purposes only" indicated a footprint that would conform but that no actual house plan had been developed for the property. That would be decided in the future when a building permit is requested. ' Attorney Erickson observed that the ordinance states that when a variance is granted, conditions can be imposed to assure compliance and to protect adjacent properties. The building pad as illustrated would be allowed without setback variances and would be controlled only by the building code. If a house was proposed varying from that footprint that would require setback variances, it could not be built without the granting of variances from the City. If a variance is granted now, conditions can be imposed to protect adjacent properties through a development agreement or through the variance document itself.. If the condition being imposed is.that the building is one story, however defined, that could be done under the ordinance and by statute at this stage as opposed to subsequently at the building permit stage. , Considerable discussion followed on°these issues: 1) a two lot subdivision versus a' three lot subdivision, 2) whether a hardship exists that would justify a 4 foot lot width variance for Lot 1, 3) whether to impose a condition that the home to be built on Lot 2 shall be one - story, 4) proposed placement of the house on Lot 3, 5) the discussion at the Planning Commission hearings which resulted in the recommendation for denial of a three lot subdivision requiring lot width variances for Lot 1 and Lot 3, and 6) if the revised plat now under consideration should be sent back to the Planning Commission. Planner Larsen reminded the Council that the 120 day requirement for Council action had earlier been waived by the proponents but that they were not requesting action on the preliminary plat. Member Rice introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption subject to execution of a developer's agreement at final plat . approval requiring that any house to be built on Lot 2 be limited to 18' in height from ground level to roof peak: RESOLUTION GRANTING PRHLTMaiARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR FARRELLS PARKUOOD KNOLLS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled, "FARREL S PARKWOOD KNOLLS ", platted by James M. Farrell and Linda Farrell, husband and wife, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of January 22, 1991, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Rice,,Smith Nays: Paulus, Richards Resolution.adopted. SEVER.- BACKUP CI.4IM.:OUR.ICHARD MILLER. 5340• HOLLYii00W RD.. DISCUSSED Manager Rosland recalled that the sever backup claim of Richard Miller, 5340 Hollywood Rdi -was discussed at the January 7, 1991, meeting and was continued to allow staff to review the incident and procedures taken and to discuss it further with the insurance company. After meeting with the insurance company, they affirmed that no liability was found and the claim was turned down. Subsequently, Engineer Hoffman has talked to Mr. Miller and made a minor offer in an attempt to resolve the claim. Richard Miller, 5340 Hollywood Rd.; said as a customer he was addressing the Council as the manager's of the municipal utility in addition to being elected officials. He stated that their home was hooked up to City water and sewer in 1981. On December 8, 1990, they discovered sewage coming, geyser like, out of the toilet in the lower level bathroom. After calling 911, a City crew was on site within 10 -15 minutes. They found a blockage in the main sewer just north of his home, which they felt floated down from Oxford Avenue, and upon attempting to remove the blockage were unsuccessful. Because of the action of the City crew, the house was nearly uninhabitable. Except for emergency action of a private contractor who was able to get on site within an hour, the house would have been nearly destroyed. Plaster walls, woodwork and new carpeting had to be removed and it took he entire holiday season to restore the house. Mr. Miller said the damages were well documented and the City's insurance adjustor, who visited the site, was satisfied that the. work that was being done was necessary. However, the insurance company arbitrarily and capriciously turned the claim down for the reason that the City could not be responsible for what was put in the sewer. He said he was not concerned about what was found in the sewer he was concerned about what the City crew undertook to do that was unsuccessful and by their action caused the damage to his home. Mr. Miller concluded by asking that the Council give consideration to his claim so that it would not have to litigated. Manager Rosland commented that the normal procedure on claims is to refer them to the insurance, company who makes the decision on .whether the claims are allowed. No formal action was taken by the Council. *BID AWARDED FOR ONE 1991 UNMARRED MID -SIZE POLICE VEHICLE Notion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by.Member Smith for award of bid for one 1991 unmarked Police vehicle to Grossman Chevrolet, Burnsville, NN, per Hennepin County Cooperative Purchasing Contract #1549DO, at $11,492.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes *BID AWARDED FOR SIX (6) 1991 FULL -SIZE POLICE PURSUIT VEHICLES Notion vas made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for six full -size police pursuit vehicles, to Rathert Chevrolet, Duluth, NN, per State of Minnesota Purchasing Cooperative, at $77.376.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. BID AWARDED FOR ONE TON PICK -UP TRUCK WITH SNOW PLOW UNIT Member Paulus asked if this pick -up truck would solely be used at Edinborough Park and Centennial Lakes or would it be, available for use at other locations. Manager Rosland said the pick -up would mainly be used at Edinborough and Centennial Lakes on a daily basis, but would be available for use at other locations. Notion was made by Member Kelly for award of bid fora one ton pick -up truck with snow plow unit to Viking Chevrolet, Inc, Fridley, MR, per Hennepin Contract #1678A0 at $16,114.90. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith Richards Motion carried. *BID AWARDED,- FOR�TWO 1/2 TON-PICK--UP TRUCKS ,Notion was,made by Member-: Kelly and was seconded- by -- Member- =Smith -. for -award -of . bid. - for -two•:1 /2-.ton.-pick -up ;trucks to Thomas Pontiac & G.M.C., Inc., per-Hennepin County Contract at 021.A76.00— Mot ion-.- carried.-- on rollcall _.,vote . five- ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR RANGE GOLF BALLS WITH BRAEKAR LOGO Motion was made by Member Relly and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for 2500 dozen range golf-balls with the Braemar logo to recommended low- bidder, Spalding, at $13,750.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR CARPETING AT BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for carpeting at Braemar Clubhouse to recommended low- bidder, Anderson's New Carpeting Design, at $18,130.25. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *ORDINANCE NO. 171 -A36 (TO INCREASE CERTAIN FEES) ADOPTED: SECOND READING WAIVED Member Kelly made a motion to adopt Ordinance No. 171 -A36 To 'Increase Fees as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 171 -A36 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 171 TO INCREASE CERTAIN FEES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. The following described fee numbers of Schedule A to Ordinance No. 171 are amended to read as follows: ORD. SEC. PURPOSE.OF NO. NO. FEE OR CHARGE AMOUNT FEE NO. 432 -A1 5 Plumbing permit To install and inspect RPZ 14t -1 backflow preventer $25.00 Re- inspection of RPZ backflow preventer 25.00 Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage and publication. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Smith Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. MINUTES OF TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE OF 1/15191 APPROVED Engineer Hoffman explained that for item (1) of Section A, the Traffic Safety Committee had received a request from Robert Shadduck of Jerry's Enterprises, 5101 Vernon Avenue South, to install a "stop" sign at the exit lane from the top level at Jerry's Parking Ramp to control access points. The Committee recommended "Yield" signs instead. For item (2) Section A, Engineer,Hoffman recalled that at the October 9, 1990, Traffic Safety meeting, the west side of France Avenue between West 51st Street and the north drive of Americana Bank was designated a MTC bus layover area•for the hours-9:00 A.M. and after 8:00 P.M. weekdays and on Saturdays and Sundays for a three month period. At the January 15, 1991, Traffic Safety meeting, the issue was reviewed and the Committee recommended to permanently designate the area for MTC bus. layover. It was the consensus of the Council to delete the term 'permanently' from the recommendation. Member Kelly made a motion to approve the recommended action listed in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of January 15, 1991: 1) To install a "YIELD" -sign near the end of the top level ramp exit with instructions to observe - traffic to the left - and - right, and re- evaluate this item In April, 2) To designate the west side of- France Avenue between West:- 51st. Street: and the north drive of Americana Bank as an NTC layover zone before 9:00 AN and after 8:00 PM weekdays, and on Saturdays and Sundays, and to acknowledge Sections B and C of the Minutes. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT UPDATE GIVEN Assistant Manager Gordon Hughes gave an update on the Tax Increment Financing Districts that were established on April 2, 1990, at-44th & France, Valley View Road & Wooddale Avenue and 70th Street & Cahill Road as follows. ACTIONS TAKEN FROM APRIL 2. 1990 May 7, 1990 -- Council directed staff to retain the services of J. Peter Meyers to facilitate ongoing discussions with property owners in the Districts to ascertain interest of property owners in pursuing development and redevelopment activities. July 12, 1990 - The City entered into a development agreement with REC, Inc., concerning the redevelopment of the Cahill School property, that would include the demolition of Cahill Elementary School, construction of streets and utilities, dedication of a conservation easement, removal of underground fuel tanks, subdivision deduction and the provision of a memorial monument at the corner of 70th Street & Cahill Road. The agreement implemented the decisions reached by the Council relative to the Cahill School rezoning and subdivision. With the exception of the monument, no financial contribution was made to this project by virtue of the development agreement. September 4, 1990 - After conversations with property owners, J. Peter Meyers reported there was little interest on the part,of property owners to pursue development proposals, except for Ed Atcas, owner of the Southwest Clinic Building. Council consensus was that nothing further should be pursued in the districts except for meeting with Mr. Atcas. After'September 4, 1990 - City staff had several conversations with Mr. Atcas concerning the expansion of the Southwest Clinic building in conjunction with the possible acquisition of the potential sale of the Roster Service Station. Conversations with Mr. Roster concerning the sale of the service station were also held. At last conversation with Mr. Atcas, he was reluctant to pursue an expansion due to financial feasibility. LEGAL ISSUES AFFECTING THE DISTRICTS January 7, 1991 Council-Meeting - The Districts are affected by certain provisions of the tax increment financing law adopted by the legislature at its last session. At least one of the following actions must be taken prior to June 1, 1991: 1) a development agreement must be entered into by the City for a site in the district 2) bonds must be issued to finance project costs, or 3) the City must acquire property in the district Unless one of these three actions occurs, with regard to a particular District by June 1, 1991, that district will no longer qualify as a tax increment financing district. Failure to satisfy,the requirement by one district will not affect the remaining two districts. The development,agreement relative to the Cahill School 'redevelopment project, meets the legal criteria. Therefore the 70th & Cahill District is in compliance and will continue to exist after June 1, 1991. No actions have been taken at,44th & France or at Valley View and Wooddale. Therefore, these Districts are subject to potential decertification on June 1, 1991. FINANCIAL. ISSUES The= Districts- together_comprise:.one "development.:district ". Increments.- .received from all.- _three:Districts may.--be-pooled and directed -to.a- project in one- ioftthe Districts— Evew if one or-two of the Districts..were decertified as described above, those areas nevertheless remain within the development district. The 44th & France District was qualified as a redevelopment district,, whereas the Valley View/Wooddale and the 70th & Cahill Road Districts were qualified as economic development districts. There are two critical differences between redevelopment, districts and economic development districts. These differences relate to the base, i.e. "frozen value ", of the District and the duration of the District. In redevelopment districts, the base value of the District is frozen and remains unchanged for'the life of the District, which is 20 years. Therefore, for the entire duration of the District, the City would capture increments attributable to inflation and /or new construction. In economic development districts, however, the base value of the District increases each year at the annual rate of inflation for the five years prior to establishment of the District. In addition, economic development districts enjoy a duration of only 8 -10 years depending upon the date of the receipt of the first tax increments. In the case of the 70th & Cahill District, the base value will increase at a rate of approximately 5% a year. In the case of the Wooddale & Valley View District, the base value will increase at a rate of approximately 4 1/4% a year. For taxes payable in 1991, increase in property values at 70th & Cahill and Valley View & Wooddale, did not match the increase in base value. Therefore, no tax increments will be generated at 70th & Cahill or Valley View,& Wooddale for 1991. At 44th & France, increments of approximately $8,000 are expected for 1991. The redevelopment of the Cahill School site will likely result in positive increments being generated in future years. However, this will depend largely on the development schedule of this project which could be seriously affected by economic conditions. Based on the above issues, and the present uncertainty of the economy, staff cannot assure the Council that sufficient increments will be generated to finance public cost without the prospect of an accompanying new development. SUMMARY AND FUTURE ACTIONS In order to preserve the 44th & France and Valley View & Wooddale Districts, steps must be taken in the very. near future to comply with statutory requirements. Even if either or both of these districts fail to meet the criteria and are decertified on June 1, 1991, increments from the 70th & Cahill District could be used to .finance public improvements within the 44th & France and Valley View & Wooddale areas. However, tax increments are not now being generated at 70th & Cahill and the prospect of future increments depends largely on the development schedule of the project. The 44th & France District may have the greatest potential for increments in the future, in that this District is not affected by a continually. inflating base value and is of a 20 year duration. However, at the present time little interest has been expressed at 44th & France in pursuing private projects that would generate future increment. If the City wishes to proceed with property acquisition in any of these Districts, it should do so with the understanding that increments may not exist in the future to repay the City's acquisition costs. In response to questions from Member Smith, Assistant Manager Hughes commented that if the City chose to acquire some property for redevelopment, namely the service station at Valley View & Wooddale, the City could do that if funding could be found. The assessor's estimated market value of the subject property is less than $100,000, but acquisition costs would likely be greater than that. The City would also be subject to relocation benefits. Member Smith also asked if the City could acquire property, rehabilitate it and then sell it back to the previous owner. Assistant Manager Hughes replied that, typically the City can spend tax increment money on public projects, i.e. acquiring property and demolishing what is there. It is difficult to go the next..step and actually construct with public money. The,City- could ..lend,money to a private -individual..to do rehabilitation work on -_.a building,_. Member Smith.observed..that of the'-thiee areas; Wooddale & Valley View was of some concern and the issue may be whether the Council should be pro- active to address that concern. Member Kelly.asked if the City could add to the north and /or south boundaries of the 44th & France District. Assistant Manager Hughes said it would be very difficult under the new law to expand the district. He reported that on January 18, 1991, he had received a call from�a business owner in the district, Mr. Durr, who expressed _ an interest in expanding his retail business by acquiring a second home to the we'st. Mr. Durr had asked if the City or the HRA would participate.financially. Member Rice,commented that the City had created these districts in a timely fashion and had sent out staff and a consultant to see what could be done. However, with little interest shown by the property owners, there is no reason to do anything except to let the districts expire. Mayor Richards advised that, if the Council wished to be pro- active, action would have to be taken prior to June 1, 1991. FIVE YEAR CAPITAL PLAN FOR SEWER AND WATER_ PRESENTED: 1991 PROJECTS APPROVED Engineer Hoffman presented the Five Year Capital Plan for Water and Sanitary Sewer Systems of the City. Line items were explained and discussed and 1991 projects were identified. Member Kelly's motion was seconded by Member Rice to approve the recommended "Five Year Capital Plan for Sever and Water" and the 1991 Projects, as identified. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. I- 494/169 LAND ACQUISITION ATTEMPTS TO CONTINUE Planner Larsen reported on the continuing attempt to acquire property in the northeast quadrant of Highways 169 and 494. The City's offer of $290,000 has been rejected by officials of Metropolitan Federal Bank. They have countered with an offer of $360,000. It is staff's belief that with an.offer of $340,000 a deal can be made. The Bank has been asked to identify specific representations and warranties contained in the purchase agreement, which they find unacceptable. A response is expected soon. In reviewing state statutes and agency regulations to determine what permits are needed to use the property as planned, i.e. composting, temporary,storage, and recycling of road materials, it appears the City will need,only to give the Pollution Control Agency written notice of our activities. The Bank has provided Phase I environmental review for the property. City Attorneys are presently reviewing this report, which will likely be adequate if we'receive acceptable warranties from the seller. If not, some further environmental work may be required. Planner Larsen asked for the City's offer of $340,000, subject to satisfactory resolution of the environmental and permit issues. Following discussion, Member Rice made a motion to continue the negotiations to acquire the subject property for the previous offering price authorized by the Council of $290,000. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. PROPOSED EMMITURE OF FORFEITED MONIES APPROVED Police Chief Swanson explained that forfeiture money has been accumulated over the last several years to a sum of over $40,000.- Guidelines for its expenditure -.are quite specific - asset out-in The Attorney General's Guidelines for Seized •and- ,Forfeited-.Property,.July 1990; -and Minnesota Statute Criminal Code 609.5315. Chief Swanson -then -presented.�:the.�r Expenditure of Forfeited Monies plan as outlined in his memorandum of January 17; 1991, totalling, $39,019.00. Member Smith expressed concern about purchasing items that would have a future budget obligation for continued use, i.e. air time on cellular telephones for squad cars. Member Smith commented he would prefer using monies collected from drug seizure for drug prevention. Chief Swanson stated the D.A.R.E. program is a prevention program, and is geared for the drug.education from 5th grade, 10 year old level. In response to questions from Member Paulus, Chief Swanson said the primary reason for acquiring cellular telephones would be for telephone reporting. On 911 calls, residents could be given a choice whether they want an officer to-come or could a zone officer call, them to discuss .their concerns. Besides being more cost effective, zone officers can better keep in touch with the community. Cellular air time is purchased under a Hennepin County bid, making it much more cost effective. Member Kelly made a motion to approve the expenditure of forfeiture monies as presented and as recommended by Chief Swanson. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards Nays: Smith Motion carried. ABSENTEE POLICY ESTABLISHED FOR ADVISORY BOARDS /COMMISSIONS /COMMITTEES Manager Rosland informed the Council that the present advisory board policy consists of automatic removal if any board member misses four meetings in one year or three consecutive meetings. From time to time, there may be unusual circumstances that could create a hardship on a board member to attend a meeting. Manager Rosland said he would recommend the policy: An advisory board member who has missed three consecutive meetings or know that he /she will miss these three consecutive meetings can address a letter to the board.chair stating the circumstances. The chair of the board will then, if he /she agrees, forward the letter to the Mayor. With the Mayor's approval and also the consent of the City Council, the advisory board member will be excused and allowed to continue to serve. Member Kelly made a motion that the absentee policy for advisory boards /commissions /committees be adopted as presented. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Richards Nays: Paulus, Rice Motion carried. RICHARD MILLER NOMINATED FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT BOARD Mayor Richards advised that the terms of Richard Miller and Thomas Maple, Jr. on the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Board will expire March 8, 1991. Two additional residents have expressed an interest in serving on this Board. Mr. Miller said he had served on the board for three terms and has applied for reappointment. He spoke of his background and interest.in continuing to serve and asked for the Council's support. Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the term of Richard Miller on the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Board will end on March 8, 1991, and WHEREAS, Richard Miller has fairly represented the interests of the City of Edina and its residents- living adjacent to Minnehaha Creek: BE IT RESOLVED ., -by =the City Council of Edina,. Minnesota-,- that: it hereby- recommends and -- nominates.Richard Miller.to the: Hennspin- County Board -of Commissioners4or re- appointme=-- to�:the :Minnehaha Creek Watershed District- Board. ADOPTED this 22nd day of January, 1991. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes:,Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. APPOINTMENTS TO ADVISORY BOARDS /COMMISSIONS /COMMITTEES DISCUSSED Mayor Richards referred to. information included in Council packets on Advisory Boards and Commission members whose terms of office expire on February 1, 1991. Vacancies, due either to resignations or ineligibility because of the limitation of terms by State Statute, were also noted. Mayor Richards asked Council members to respond with names of residents with an interest in serving on these Boards and Commissions to him by February 1, 1991. Mayor Richards stated letters would be sent to Board and Commission members with absences beyond the allowed limit. *RESOLUTION FOR HENNEPIN COUNTY RECYCLING FUNDING APPROVED Mayor Richards said that Hennepin County now requires each City Council to submit a resolution approving submittal of the 1991 Recycling Grant Application. Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved adoption. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Pursuant to Minnesota Statute 115A.551, by December 31, 1993, each county in the metropolitan area will have as a goal to recycle a minimum of 35 percent (35 %) by.veight of total solid waste generation, and each county must develop and implement or require political subdivisions within the county to develop and implement programs, practices, or methods designed to meet its.recycling goal; and WHEREAS, Pursuant to Minesota Statute 115A.552, counties shall ensure that residents have an opportunity to recycle; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County Ordinance 13 requires each city to implement a recycling program to enable the County to meet its recycling goals -; and WHEREAS, the County has adopted a Hennepin County Funding Assistance Policy for Source Separated Recyclables on September 11, 1990, to distribute funds to cities for the development and implementation of waste reduction and recycling programs; and WHEREAS, to be eligible to receive these County funds, cities must meet the conditions set forth in the "funding policy;" and WHEREAS, the City of Edina desires to receive these County funds; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council authorizes, the submittal of the 1991-Hennepin County Grant application for Municipal Source Separated Recyclables; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that as a condition•to receive fiords under the Hennepin County Finding Assistance Policy, the City agrees to implement a waste reduction and recycling program as committed to by its submission of the 1991 Hennepin County Recycling Grant Application and that the City will use such County funds only for the limited purpose of implementing the city's waste reduction and recycling program. ADOPTED THIS 23rd day of January, 1991. Resolution adopted on rollcall vote, five ayes. *PETITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SIDEWALKS REFERRED TO ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. Notion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Smith to refer the following petitions for sidewalk construction and pedestrian crossing to the Engineering Department for processing: 1) Sidewalk - East side of Wooddale Avenue between Wooddale Lane and West:56th Street. 2) Sidewalk.- West side of Cornelia Drive between-West 71st - .Street and:..West 72nd Street; North side of. West. 72nd. Street.- between Cornelia. Drive- ,and._OaklawneAvenue- 3) Pedestrian. Crossing and Sidewalk - Pedestrian-- CrossingA,to...and.,froa. the- =East side. of_ France.. Avenue at the. -. intersections of . West 66th_ Street/France�jAveuue; Sidewalk- East of France Avenue on the North side of hest 66th Street. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. RESOLUTION ADOPTED ASKING REGIONAL TRANSIT BOARD TO RECONSIDER FUNDING FOR DIAL -A- RIDE PROJECT IN I -494 CORRIDOR Planner Larsen explained that two demonstration projects have been planned for the I -494 corridor as part of an effort to implement long term Travel Demand Management (TDM) strategies. One of these, the "guaranteed ride home" has begun and is a two year demonstration. The other, dial -a -ride, was scheduled for the near future and would be an 18 month demonstration. Recently, the Regional Transit Board eliminated funding for the demonstration. The expected cost was approximately $150,000 for 18 months. This Dial -A -Aide service would serve Edina, Richfield and Bloomington residents who would be picked up at their door and dropped off-in one of two employment areas. The'service shows promise as an attractive alternative to the single occupant vehicle. A similar service has been successful in the Seattle, Washington, metropolitan area. Staff,.members of the I -494 Corridor Commission and the Metropolitan Council feel it is important to demonstrate the viability of alternatives to the single occupant vehicle such as the proposed dial -a -ride service. Member Paulus mentioned that Travel Demand Management (TDM) is the goal of the I -494 Joint Powers Organization (JPO) and the members of the JPO feel we will not reach any TDM unless programs like this go into effect. Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City of Edina is committed to efforts to relieve traffic congestion on Interstate Highway 494, and WHEREAS, the City of Edina wishes to improve the operating conditions of I -494 in the most energy efficient and cost efficient manner, and WHEREAS, the dial -a -ride service seems to be uniquely suited to suburban conditions; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina supports the proposed dial -a- ride service and requests that the Regional Transit Board fund the demonstration project as originally proposed. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards Nays: Smith Resolution adopted. COUNCIL REMINDED OF MLC ANNUAL LEGISLATIVE DINNER SCHEDULED FOR 1/30/91 Manager Rosland reminded the Council members to make reservations for the MLC Annual Legislative Dinner at 6:30 P.M. at the Decathlon Club. RESOLUTION ADOPTED TO SUPPORT GRANT FOR YARD WASTE COLLECTION .Manager Rosland said he had received a request that the Council consider a resolution in support of a grant application to experiment with paper yard waste bags in the City of Edina, to reduce and stabilize the cost of yard waste collection. Member Rice introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, yard waste is -an important part of the waste stream to divert and is currently collected as a separate waste stream; and WHEREAS, the cost of such collection has risen to extreme; and WHEREAS, compost sites prefer or demand de- bagged yard waste material and plastic yard waste bags-add -to the expense of removal at the compost site; and WHZ]U[AS ,-paper ° -yard• waste -bags may reduce-or at least control the escalating costs of- `yard waste' coUposting; - and WHEREAS -, tha,Woodlake- Sanitary- Service; Inc. grant- - project - will_-create °a- process for r the regions haulers to use, controlling the rising cost of yard waste collection; NOW, TBMUEFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council, that the City of Edina gives its full support to this project and requests that the Metropolitan Council give full consideration to the application, and consider as well the value this project brings to-the region by approving the grant award. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. LETTER TO BE SENT TO GOVERNOR IN SUPPORT OF DEFICIT REDUCTION PACKAGE Mayor Richards reported that he and Manager Rosland had attended a meeting of the Municipal Legislative Commission (MLC) at which the Governor's deficit reduction package was discussed. The issue before the MLC was to join a coalition of other local government associations and adopt a resolution opposing the Governor's budget cuts. Mayor Richards had told the members of the MLC that Edina could not support such a resolution because we are serious about curtailing government spending. It was the consensus of the Council that a letter, signed by Mayor Richards, be transmitted to Governor Carlson in support of his propose deficit reduction package, with copies to Edina's legislators. *CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith to approve payment of the following claims as shorn in detail on the Check Register dated 1/22/91 and consisting of 32 pages: General Fund $214,745.47, C.D.B.G. $6,060.00, Communications $1,343.57, Art Center $10,185.63, Capital Fund $6,989.62, Swimming Pool Fund $25.00, Golf Course Fund $8,713.85; Recreation Center Fund $8,230.17, Gun Range Fund $581.74, Edinborough Park $18,964.49, Utility Fund $9,148.19, Liquor Dispensary Fund $88,029.63, Construction Fund $662,232.53, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $853.85, TOTAL $1,036,103.74; and for confirmation of payment of the following claims as shorn in detail on the Check Register dated 12/31/90 and consisting of 18 pages: General Fund $579,348.96, Communications $13,657.73, Art Center $1,344.20, Swimming Pool Fund $116.75, Golf Course Fund $6,816.50, Recreation Center Fund $11,484.19, Gun Range Fund $408.54, Edinborough Park $9,129.47, Utility Fund $26,404.08, Storm Sewer Utility $489.07, Liquor Dispensary Fund $314,216.50, Construction Fund $2,637.50, TOTAL $966,053.49. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the meeting adjourned at 11:15 P.M. City Clerk oil A. It \ O . , �^�bnoreww• REPORT /RECOMMENDATION i To: KENNETH ROSLAND j From: KRIS AAKER i Date: MARCH 4, 1991 Subject: C 91-2, TEMPORARY To HRA CONDITIONAL USE ! E PERMIT, HOME OCCUPA- Action TION, DR. JOYCE Motion ANDERSON, 7121 GLOUCHESTER AVENUE Recommendation: Info /Background Agenda Item ## II. A. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends F7 To HRA ! E To Council Action r lI Motion Resolution Ordinance C Discussion The City Council, on February 4, 1991, voted to reconsider the issuance of a Temporary Conditional Use Permit for Dr. Joyce Anderson. Notice of this hearing was published in the Sun - Current and mailed to property owners within 350 feet pursuant to Zoning Ordinance requirements. Attached to this cover is a detailed outline of Dr. Anderson's proposed hours and days of operation. This outline was submitted following the February 4,.1991, meeting. GRAY, PLANT, MOOTY, MOOTY & BENNETT, P.A. INCLUDING THE FORMER FIRM OF HARSfAD & RAINBOW HAROLD G. CANT 11887 -1973, HENRY W. HAVERSTOCK 118 4-1 9771 �/�/� `fin CM1 CCEEN lyG�l�-�� FRANKLIN D. GRAY ! 1904 -19901 TROY,A. BADER LAURAJ. HEIN EDWARD A. GARVEY MYRON L. FRANS L34W THIRTY THREE SOU l Cl SIA 1 [7 SMET FRANK W. PLANT, JR. DANIEL R. SHULMAN MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402.3796 JOHN W. MOOTY MICHAEL R. CUNNINGHAM 'rp- MELVIN R. MOOTY ROBERT P. LARSON gpHONE612.343'2800 SHEFFIELD WEST THOMAS L, JOHNSON GEORGE R. WOOD RUSSELL M. BENNETT RICHARD A. MOORE. JR. " FAJ((i12.333.0066 CLINTON A. SCHROEDER WILLIAM L. KILLION NANCY ROETMAN MENZEL C. E LAINE HARSTAD ELIZABETH W. NORTON 'j�(!j(%lO.576.2778 EDWARD J. CALLAHAN. JR. JOHN E. BROWER DEAN A. LEDOUX JAMES S. SIMONSON 'THOMAS DARLING RICHARD N. FLINT JOHN M. NICHOLS' WADE T. ANDERSON C URTIS D. FORSLUND MARTHA A. VAN DE VEN D. JAMES NIELSEN M AC LAY R. HYDE MARY BETH BRODY VALERIE BOLES WAGONER BRUCE D. GRUSS ING EDWIN R. HOLMES DAVID M, COYNE C. STEVEN WILSON - DAVID N. MOOTY JOHN S. CROUCH RICHARD A. HACKETT DAV ID T. BENNETT WILLIAM D. KLEIN EDWIN C. CARPENTER SUSAN L. SEGAL LINDLEY S. BRANSON NICHOLAS N. NIERENGARTEN JOHN W. THIEL ALBERT ANDREWS, JR. JOHN L. KRENN STEPHEN R.EDE DIRECT DIAL 343 -2863 NOEL P MULLER JOHN D. GI UDICES SI. JR. DOUGLAS R. RAINBOW KATHLEEN S. TILLOTSON FRANKLIN C. JESSE, JR. MICHAEL C. FLOM DAV ID L. WH ITE DAVID C. BAHLS BRUCE E. KIERNAT PHILLIP BOHL February 11 1991 Mr. Craig Larsen City Planner City.of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Mr. Larsen: JAMES F. CARROLL BARBARA E. TRETHEWAY ROBERT E. HARDING TROY,A. BADER LAURAJ. HEIN EDWARD A. GARVEY MYRON L. FRANS MARA R. THOMPSON ERIK T. SALVE SON MARK E. MULHOLLAM RICHARD G. BRAMAN NANCYJ. MILLER PENNY M. T18 KE STACY A. LEVIN NANCY QUATTLEBAUM BURKE SUSAN DECKER LENCZEWSKI . WILLIAM J. FISHER CHARLOTTE A,'KIMBALL VIRGINIA S. SCHUBERT GINA B. SAUER GEORGE R. WOOD WILLIAM R. PECK TAMARA HJELLE OLSEN JOHN G. SHULMAN LYNN B. NOLAND TERRY M. WALCOTT NANCY ROETMAN MENZEL QUENTIN R. WITTROCK ROBERTJ.MCREAVY DEAN A. LEDOUX GREGORYR.MERZ BRIAN B. SCHNELL OF COUNSEL WADE T. ANDERSON ROBERT L. HELLAND ARTHUR W. DICKINSON D. JAMES NIELSEN LAURAJ. SCHOENBAUER DANIEL B. VENTRES. JR. VALERIE BOLES WAGONER ROBERT A. STEIN RICK E. KUBLER DAVID M, COYNE TIMOTHY M. BURKE BETSYB.BAKER Enclosed please find a supplement to the application of Dr. Joyce Anderson. It is my understanding that this will be back before the council on March 4. JWM:jja 0643Y Enclosure r SIPPLEMENT TO APPLICATION OF •R. JOYCE G. s_ +• •, The undersigned applicant wishes to supplement her application for a temporary use permit by stating as follows: (1) No trips will occur on Sunday; (2) no trips will occur after 12:00 noon on Saturday; (3) on Monday through Friday, no appointment will be made to: (a) commence after 5:00 p.m.; (b) no appointment will extend beyond 6:00 p.m.; (c) not more than one appointment shall occur during the period from 5:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. (d) no appointment shall overlap with any other appointment; (e) no appointment shall be made that commences before 9:30 a.m.; (f) in no event shall more than six appointments be made in any day nor more than twenty in any week; (g) all vehicles of, clients shall park off - street; (h) no changes shall be made in either the interior or exterior of the premises. Dated: T 2206.Y Dr. Joyc ,G. Anderson 109 1-.,.i,chester me Ed-Ic.r- MN 55435 City CJ ;.-u-'ina CITY C,(.IJr4-'[!- Planning'(.)epartmeent 4801 'vest 50th Str.:!ei: Edina 1VIN. 1.-,:;424 Ladies and Cjentiewm, We IvEive no t)roblem with ariv additloiial. L r-.:-If f i c :IL -Ar'l' 1:0ur c;l t he J' -_-,Y that, *jrju 1.0' be c rcmjr.ed with 0 r . ;I%nderson'• u ..., tz. permit. Please issue the Permi t Dr. Anderson for the N'XII-S. requests and -for cm? nmirreer of patients she would I 1"a t.c haY6 v1 sit her rasidenc-6. Thank ..ou ..'im & V';(;k,. Reicha-At Alt i ,&/ A �% 7,A4 . .. S a?44 42 T 4, ,^o i/.crc , / r- - >?L v /G w 4 lam E i Af (s ink :Z44 e,: c a !,e At G / a t2._ s a^r AG A,, 7-4 t r.2 a E co nr c � � �v �-Pl�noyG A ^c � eoS .7A 4T /bn� 0aCi T7 . k/ <j - To /1-7.4 LCD 0 /f C' $,I-ofI -E 7-Ar e-- gs s /\C o cz,- , .s. p s -7 y1 r c /+-C (Z viz m vize- yk o 1 v T,4 c - �H �A-e— A s 13 Ao 1��-aT b�-�- D�2���r 6 T •� i Pr/L /o p o /I- �e � A 12--5 Tim � -T �1 oor D.�� -.s o�c.( /�1 �- -� " s-= �D z?l C714 An�-Jm--1 -D2 ply. /Z- lAfa 7-?V� 4e ^tZ>jl= -4 A- 11 t�! MAYO S. BRANDJORD 7112 Glouchester Edina, Minnesota 55435 (612) 925 -2690 February 1, 1991 Edina Mayor Richards City Council Members City. Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Amendment to zoning ordinance #825 as it applies to Dr. Joyce Anderson, owner and resident at 7121 Glouchester Avenue Greetings: My wife and I own our house at 7112 Glouchester Avenue which we purchased in 1976. I have attended all but one of the City Hall meetings related to the referenced issue. The use of Dr. Anderson's home has been given a fair hearing. I do not believe that there is anything new of importance to present to the Council. Therefore, I hope that the Council will try very hard to render a fair decision at the February 4 meeting. In the following I will review some of the,information put before the Council that I think should dictate the Council's final decision: 1. The Council acted wisely when it amended the referenced Ordinance #825 to accommodate the handicapped. The Council also acted wisely when it kept a tight control over the application approval process. The amendment gives voice and protection to the neighborhood. The Council will have final control over the use of private homes for business purposes in Edina, which will prevent any abuse. However, when the Council reviews an application, it must not place more restrictions on one applicant than on another, handicapped or non - handicapped. All restrictions should be reasonable and have a sound basis for being applied. If the approval includes too many restrictions, it becomes only a cruel sham. The applicant must be able to give normal expected hours of service and must be able to make a reasonable income. 2. Dr. Anderson is an established resident of Edina. She has served clients in her homes for seven or eight years. First, one block south of her present home and three to four years at 7121 Glouchester Avenue. She is not an interlooper who sneaked "into the neighborhood. She purchased her home openly and made a point of meeting with her new neighbors and told them about her practice. In earlier years she taught piano to hundreds of students in her home at other locations and was unaware of any restrictions on the use of her home for present clients. F.,dina Mayor Richards February 1, 1991 Page Two KE 3. Dr. Anderson's clients add very little vehicular traffic to Glouchester Avenue. There is not a traffic problem, even with many neighbors operating two and three cars and have teenage drivers. There should never be a question about how many clients use her driveway because it can be checked against Dr. Anderson's client logs. 4. Those who claim that Dr. Anderson should be able to operate from a medical building, ignore the professional medical opinion on her physical limitations. Where medical buildings do provide special ingress and egress and toilet accommodations for the handicapped, that's about it. Medical examining rooms certainly are not appropriate for counseling and certainly do not make allowances for Dr. Anderson's physical limitations. The limited hours Dr. Anderson can physically work also limits the number of clients she can see in one day, and of course limits her income. The size of her practice will not support the expense of a little used office. 5. I repeat what I have stated before the Council. Dr. Anderson is•a credit to our neighborhood and has not caused any problems over the three or four years she has served her.clients in her home on our block. The whole dispute over her use of her home should not have been taken to the Planning Department in the first place. That action is now a confirmed shame, and regretted by almost all of the neighbors. I ask that the Council approve Dr. Anderson's application without any limitations on the hours and days of the week she can see her clients. Respectfully submitted, Mayo S7Brandj - - AGENDA ITEM: II.A. Received - 3/1/91 4:10 P.M. March 1, 1991 7113 Cornelia Drive Edina, MN 55435 Edina City Council Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Richards and City Council Members: The uul,jeut. of this letter is the attempt by Dr. Joyce Anderson to'practluu psychology at her residence for more than the allowable number of patients, 10, that she is allowed to see according to the city codes. This is the third letter that we have written and hope that this issue will be decided soon. In addition to all the reasons for not allowing this Temporary Condition Use Permit, such as traffic, hours of visitation, public safety matters, and some of the council members analogy with a psychologist and a music teacher, and the threatening of the council by certain handicapped lawyers who want to make this case a bigger issue than it is, two other concerns have surfaced. The first one deals with the use of the Cornelia School parking lot as a place for the clients to park and walk to the Anderson residence should show the Council and Planning Commission that this person, Dr. Anderson, is trying to conceal the true number of patients that she is actually seeing. The principal.of the school has notified the Planning Commission that he has heard from several of the neighbors, including myself who has witnessed at least three park -and walk clients last week alone, that the lot is being used by her clients as a parking lot for her business. Perhaps she would like to share the parking lot expenses with the school district. The second one deals with the clients parking directly across from our living room in the school lot and stare into our home. We have also noticed that some of the clients are dropped off for their appointment andthe school lot is the place where the driver waits for the client. We feel that we are having our privacy violated by these lookers. Last night upon driving to a store, we noticed a male enter Dr. Anderson's business. When coming back from the store an hour later, we noticed the same man walking down the street. We passed him again and noticed that he got into his car in the school parkiny lut. We started unloading groceries from our car as this man approached our driveway upon which he slowed down made inappropriate faces at both my wife, son and myself. I don't think that we must put up with this kind of behavior from a client of Dr. Anderson. We live in this area and should not be the subject of abuse from Dr. Anderson's patients. I did call the police department to register the man's licence number and the others that I have written down. I will be calling the police anytime we have a looker or strange behavior from a patient. We feel strongly that this permit should be denied for many reasons that have listed. With using the school parking lot to try to avoid being detected as a countable client (10 per week) has cast a shadow on the integrity of the person applying for this permit. (2) Sincerely, Paul S. Wehrineister Joan C. Wehrmeister r COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM II.A City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Case file C -91 -2, Temporary Conditional Use Permit Application of Dr. Joyce G. Anderson Honorable Members of the Council: At the time of Joyce's previous approach to the council , I wrote you about my thoughts on the matter. I also attended the council meeting and was pleased at the concern shown by some of the council members for residential needs and balancing those needs with Ms. Anderson's. My position has not changed.. The existing code which she proposes to operate within goes as far as it should. As it's written it makes exception to normal residential zoning and should not be amended any further. I will restate what I put forth before: My primary concern in this matter is the erosion of the residential nature of Edina and our neighborhood in particular. One of the distinctive. attractions of the city has been its ability to sustain fine residential neighborhoods in close proximity to urban areas. The edges of the community are the first to feel the impact of adjacent business districts in the form of traffic and noise. The city has done a superb job of isolating this effect by maintaining adequate zoning. I would hope that this endures so that Edina continues to have quality neighborhoods throughout. Cities require businesses to spend a great deal of money to make their buildings handicap accessible. This is appropriate. Apparently Joyce has used some of these facilities and for whatever reason prefers working out of her home. Possibly she could utilize the office during the hours which conflict with the ordinance. Please vote NO , Thank you. D.Glen Whitesell 7116 Heatherton Trail AGENDA ITEM - COUNCIL II.A A. 0, y City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL -- -- - - - _ - 4901 West 50th Street- Edlna, Minnesota 5S424 (612) 9274=1 'lip I'� t;;.. .., �.. �. �.. �.. � ,o..,...w.lP& : :i : : : : :f. : :.;.•r, ^. ".:Olk ;} ... �: :::: x; :.v^.'oo :;:;Y��:E�A :;; : : :..; : :y if :;cRi;kc:.':x, :.. :.f� y:; •'i� :�: ..:::.r.• . ..... .. : > :... : -h.� :: :yo- A,. : : :,•k:< : :,s, ..•• ��•�."'.,�•, :: CASE FILE: C-91-2 TO: Property Owners Within 350 Feet APPLICANT: Joyce G. Anderson PROPERTY ADDRESS: 7121 Glouchester Avenue LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 5, Block 2, Stow' s Addition Reconsideration of a PURPOSE: Temporary Conditional Use Permit DATE OF HEARING: Monday, March 4, 1991 TIME OF HEARING: 7:00 PM PLACE OF HEARING: Coundi Chambers Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street HOW TO PARTICIPATE: 1. Submit a letter to the address below expressing your views, and/or 2. Attend the hearing and give testimony for or against the proposal. FURTHER INFORMATION: City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina MN SS424 (612) 9274MI DATE OF NOTICE: February 23, 19 91 ��% 22Z - , FA 6-4 1 WIZ to I 1 514 � =- 1AP -- I a "�% to COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM II.A >> Agenda Item II.A. Received 3/4/91 - 3:35 P.M. /9Q/ U 716 C� --s-. Y,71 0 So !�J// i l _ / W—M i/ 9� 7; �Si� elm' Cn r.Ty i C NOW- REFORTIREO OMMENDATION To: KENNETH ROSLAND From: KRIS AAKER Date: MARCH 4, 1991 Subject: B-91-2, VARIANCE REQUEST, U.S.-NEW VECTOR GROUP. .5600 Agenda Item.—II- B_ Consent Information Only I-7 Mgr. Recommends Q To HRA 71 To Council Action 771 Motion LINCOLN DRIVE. i Resolution I_! Ordinance I_! Discussion Recommendation: Affirm decision for denial of attached variance request. Info /Background: At their February 7, 1991 meeting the Edina Board.of Appeals and Adjustments heard the U.S. New Vector Group's request for setback and height variances to install a 98 foot tall monopole antenna tower and utility building to be located in the southeast corner of property located at 5600 Lincoln Drive (please refer to Location "A" on the attached plan.) The Board of Appeals and Adjustments voted unanimously to deny the request in agreement with staff recommendation based on the lack of demonstrated hardship. The proponent has appealed the board's decision and has requested that the .proposal be heard by the City - Council. Since the board of appeals meeting the applicant has provided staff with two additional alternatives. The first alternative located near the west property boundary and Highway 169 would require an 11 foot rear yard setback variance for the utility building and a 23 foot height variance and 78 foot rear yard setback variance for the antenna tower (please refer to Location "B" on the attached plan). The second alternative proposed is located in the Northeast corner of the property and would comply with all ordinance requirements (75 feet for antenna height and setback). Please refer to Location "C" on the attached plan. DAVID W. LARSON & ASSOCIATES ATTORNEYS AT LAW 476•A BUTLER SQUARE 1 100 NORTH SIXTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55403 -1503 TELEPHONE (612) 333 -1727 FAX (612) 333 -1337 DAVID W. CARSON• ' *ALSO ADMITTED IN WISCONSIN IAYMFS D. LITTLEIOHN•• **ALSO ADMITTED IN NORTH DAKOTA SUSAN M. POMNGER February 27, 1991 Ms. Chris Aaker Associate Planner 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Appeal of Board of Appeals and Adjustments Dear Ms. Aaker: As we have discussed, US West NewVector Group is appealing the decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals and Adjustments to deny the variance request for its antenna and building at 5600 Lincoln Drive. Following the meeting of the Board of Zoning Appeals and Adjustments, representatives of NewVector met with'the owner of the parcel at 5600 Lincoln Drive, Mr. Mickey Orren. After some discussion about the issues of the Board and the residents concerning the proposed site, Mr. Orren generously agreed to make available additional locations on the parcel for the proposed antenna. One of these locations is on the Northeast corner of the building, about 115 feet north of the originally proposed site. The advantage of this location is that a 75 foot antenna can be placed without any sort of variance required. The site is more than 75 feet from any. property line. The disadvantage of this location from a resident's point of view is that the antenna, while somewhat . shorter, is not significantly less visible than the antenna-on the originally proposed site. From the US West NewVector perspective, a 75 foot antenna, according to our engineers, is shorter than optimum and will cause technical difficulties with the system. However, a 75 foot antenna here is preferable to one in a different location farther from the search zone. We have applied for a Ms. Chris Aaker Re: Appeal of Board of Appeals and Adjustments Page 2 building permit for this site for a 75 foot antenna. The other location discussed with Mr. Orren is in the Northwest corner of the parcel, next to Highway 169. This location is about 560 feet west of the Northeast corner location. This location has some engineering difficulties, in that it is quite close to Highway 169. Mobile telephones directly underneath the antenna could lose reception. That disadvantage would be offset by other advantages if we could construct a 98 foot pole in this location. To construct here would require three variances: 1. The rear yard set back for the equipment building is 20 feet, or the building height (11 feet), whichever is greater. There is only 25 feet between the lot line and the parking lot. The equipment building is 12 feet wide, and has doors that open in the direction of the parking lot, which require an additional 4 feet in width. As a result, the building would be 9 feet from the property line, and the applicant requires an 11 foot variance from a 20 foot setback, or a 19 foot variance if the code is interpreted to require a setback equal to the height of the principal building, which is 28 feet. 2. The antenna height limitation is 75 feet. In order to install a 98 foot antenna, the applicant requires a 23 foot height variance. 3. The City administrative staff has interpreted the zoning code to require that an antenna of 98 feet be 98 feet from the lot lines. The applicant disagrees with this interpretation, and asks the council to reverse this administrative determination and the Board of Appeals on this point. The applicant's reasons are set forth in some length in the application to the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, and are in the record for the Councils' review. In the event that the Council does not reverse the administrative determination, the antenna pole would be 20 feet from the rear lot line, and the applicant requires a set -back variance of 78 feet from the State of Minnesota highway right of way. The applicant's interpretation of the zoning code is that the setback for the antenna is the same as that for the principal building or structure on the property, the office /warehouse building. That building varies in height between 22 and 28 feet from ground level. If the council adopts the applicants interpretation of the zoning code, the antenna at this location requires an 8 foot setback variance. Ms. Chris Aaker Re: Appeal of Board of Appeals and Adjustments Page 3 Using a Computer Aided Design system, the applicant has created a' model of the building, the area topography, and the proposed poles and antennas. Various surveys, - aerial photographs, and measurements were used to construct this computer model. The mathematical -.relationships are calculated by the computer, and a visual image of the proposed antenna can be created from different perspectives, with the antenna in different locations and at different heights. On the computer screen, it appears that a 98 foot pole, or even a 75 foot pole on the east end of the building will have a significantly greater visual presence with nearby residents than a 98 foot pole in the northwest site, 560 feet farther away. Unfortunately, there are several steps necessary to convert the computer screen image to a presentation display, and while those displays will be available by Friday of this week, and for the Council meeting, they are not available for this submission. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to give the Edina City Council this supplementary information about our appeal. Sincerely, David W. Larson DWL/ j rb cc': Fred Ruher. Bob Davis. Jim Swisher DAVID W. LARSON & ASSOCIATES A'170RNEYS AT LAW DAVID W. LARSON• JAYMES D. L:ITTLEJOHN- SUSAN M. POTTENGER February 15, 1991 City Clerk City of Edina 4801 West 50th St. Edina, Minnesota 55434 1. 476 -.A BUTLER SQUARE NO NORTH SIXTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55403 -1503 TELEPHONE 16121 333 -1727 FAX (61 2) 333.1337 Re: U.S. West NewVector Group Our File: 1550 Dear City Clerk: *ALSO ADMITTED IN WISCONSIN ­ALSO ADMITTED IN NORTH DAKOTA On February 7, 1991, the Edina Board of Appeals and Adjustments denied the request of U.S. West NewVector Group for setback and height variances'for an antenna and support structure to be located at 5600 Lincoln Drive, an industrial- warehouse area. By this letter, we state our desire to appeal this decision to the Edina City Council. One of the concerns of the residents was that the proposed antenna would have an impact on the value of their homes. Mr. Tim Connery, an appraiser located in Edina and familiar with Edina residential property,, has given the opinion that the antenna pole would have "no measurable value impact upon the surrounding neighborhood properties ". I have included a copy of that appraisal. Please let me know any further procedural steps that may be necessary, as well as any hearing dates. CONNEAY & ASSOCIATES, INC. REAL ESTATE'APPRAISERS — CONSULTANTS 7300 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH a MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55435 ■ ' (612) 831.8116 February 12, 1991 DAVID W. LARSON & ASSOCIATES Attention: David W. Larson 476 -A Butler Square 100 North Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55403 -1503 RE: Cellular Telephone Antenna Site U.S. West New Vector Group, Inc. 5600 Lincoln Drive Edina, Minnesota Dear Mr. Larson: In accordance with your request, I have made a preliminary investigation of the potential market value impact of the proposed cellular telephone antenna site to the surrounding properties. The proposed communication complex will consist of 98 foot cellular telephone monopole antenna tower, and a 12'x36' pre-fabricated equipment building that will have a height of approximately 102 feet. The present zoning for the site is Planned Industrial District(PID) which is my understanding allows up to 75 foot high towers. The immediate area can be best described as being in the northeast corner of 62nd Crosstown and Highway 4169. For the most part, properties located along Highway 44169'are industrial /office buildings and residential (condominiums, manor homes, twin homes, and detached single family homes). The residential area is primarily known as Parkwood Knolls, Malibu Heights, Edina Green, Nine Mile North, Londonberry, Manor Homes of Edina, -Edina West and The Habitat. The general area topography is rolling to hilly with curved and cul -de -sac streets. The subject site is located on the end of a cul -de -sac east facing, overlooking a wildlife area that is wooded and has Nine Mile Creek meandering north /south. I have personally appraised homes in this area, specifically Malibu ?& Parkwood Knolls, and found no'measurable impact of value due to the distant views of non - residential properties. CONNERY ` ASSOCIATES, INC. REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS - CONSULTANTS Mr. David W. Larson February 12, 1991 Page #2 Presently, the residential properties to the east and northeast have generally distant views of.industrial /office building properties (primarily the Opus Tower and the PHP buildings). The affect of the monopole antenna in relationship to the already present views in my opinion, have no measurable value impact upon the surrounding neighborhood properties. Thank you for this opportunity to be of service to you. Please contact me if I can be of further assistance. Cordially, CONNERY,& ASSOCIATES, INC. Timothy J. Con /nnvery, SRPA Appraiser TJC /bla Enclosure: Certification and Statement of Limiting Conditions Appraiser's Qualifications Vicinity Map Area Plan Site Plan Elevation /Structure Plan w CONNERY 67 ASSOCIATES, INC. REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS - CONSULTANTS CERTIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF LIMITING CONDITIONS CERTIFICATION: The Appraiser. certifies and agrees that: 1) The Appraiser has no present or contemplated future interest in the property appraised and that neither the employment to make the appraisal, nor the compensation for-it, is contingent upon the appraised value of the property. 2) The Appraiser has no personal interest in or bias with respect to the subject matter of the appraisal report. 3) The Appraiser has personally inspected the property, both inside and out, and that according to the best of the Appraiser's knowledge and belief, all statements and information in this report are true and correct, and that. the Appraiser has not knowingly withheld any significant information. 4) All contingent and limiting conditions are contained herein (imposed by the terms of the assignment or by the undersigned affecting the analyses, opinions, and conclusions contained in this report). 5), This appraisal report has been made in conformity with and is subject -to the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct of the appraisal organizations with which the Appraiser is affiliated. 6) All conclusions and opinions concerning the real estate that are set forth in the appraisal report were prepared by the,Appraiser whose signat- ure appears on this appraisal report, unless indicated as "Review Appraiser ". No change of any item of the appraisal report shall be made by anyone other than the appraiser, and the Appraiser shall have no responsibility for any such unauthorized change. CONTINGENT AND LIMITING CONDITIONS: The certification of the Appraiser appearing in this appraisal report is subject to the following conditions: 1) The Appraiser assumes no responsibility for matters of.a legal nature affecting the property appraised or the title thereto, nor does ,the Appraiser render any opinion as to the title, which is assumed to be good and marketable. The property is appraised as though under reasonable ownership. 2) The sketch in this report is included to assist the reader in visualizing the property, and the Appraiser assumes no responsibility for its accuracy. The Appraise has made no survey of the property. 3) The Appraiser is not required to give testimony. or appear in court because of having made this appraisal, with reference to the property in question, unless arrangements have been previously made therefor. 4)The distribution of the total valuation in this report between land and improvements applies only under the existing program of utilization. The separate valuations for land and building must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and are invalid if so used. 5) The Appraiser assumes that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil, or structures which would render it more or less valuable. The Appraiser assumes no responsibility for such conditions or for engineering which might be required to discover such factors. 6) Information, estimates, and opinions furnished to the Appraiser and contained in this report were obtained from sources considered reliable and believed to be true and correct. However, no responsibility for accuracy of such items furnished the Appraiser can be assumed by the Appraiser. 7) Disclosure by the Appraiser of the contents of this appraisal report is subject to review in accordance with the by -laws and regulations of the professional appraisal organizations with which the Appraiser is affiliated. 8) Neither all nor part of the contents of this report, or copy thereof, shall'be used for any other purpose, than those previously mentioned, without the written consent of the Appraiser, nor shall it be conveyed by anyone to the public through advertising, public. relations, news, sales, or other media, without the written consent and approval of the Appraiser: 9) On all appraisals, subject to satisfactory, completion, repairs, or alterations, the appraisal report and value conclusion are contingent upon completion of the improvements in a workmanlike manner. 10) In this appraisal assignment, the existence of potentially hazardous material used in the construction or maintenance of the building, such as the ..presence of.urea -form- aldehyde foam insulation, and /or the existence of toxic waste, which may or may not be present on the property, was not observed by me; nor do I have any knowledge of the existence of such materials on or in the property. The Appraiser, however, is not qualified to detect such substances. The existence of urea - formaldehyde foam insulation or other potentially hazardous waste material may have an effect on the value of the property. I (we) urge the client to retain an expert in this field if desired. CONNERY s7 ASSOCIATES, INC.' REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS - CONSULTANTS QUALIFICATIONS OF APPRAISER Timothy J. Connery, SRPA I. PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIP Society of Real Estate Appraisers, Senior Real Property Appraiser(SRPA) and Senior Residential Appraiser(SRA) designations. Affiliate member of the Greater Minneapolis Area Board of Realtors. State o•f�Minnesota licensed appraiser I.D.#4000534. II. SPECIALIZED EDUCATION Since being in the appraisal profession, have completed various real estate courses at the University of Minnesota. Have also completed courses sponsored by the Society of Real Estate Appraisers, which are: Introduction to Appraising Real Estate(Course 101), Principles of Income Property Appr.aising(Course 201)(both held at Macalester College), plus a Narrative Report Seminar, Mortgage Equity Analysis Seminar, the Valuation of Leases and Leasehold Interest Seminar, Creative Financing /Cash Equivalency Seminar, Adjusting for Financial Differences in Residential Properties Seminar, Energy Considerations in Real Estate Appraising Seminar, ERC- Relocation Appraisal Seminar, Professional Practice Seminar, and the Appraiser's Guide to the Uniform Appraisal Report Seminar. Have instructed an appraisal course sponsored by the Society of. Real Estate Appraisers.and for the Minneapolis Vocational Adult Evening School. III. APPRAISAL EXPERIENCE Real estate experience dates from 1962. From 1978 to the present, have been an independent fee appraiser and president of Connery & Associates, Inc., a Real Estate Appraiser- Consultant firm. From 1968 to 1978 was employed as a staff fee appraiser for a local independent real estate appraisal firm. From 1962 to 1968 was employed as a deputy assessor. Real estate appraisal assignments completed include residential, multiple family, vacant acreage, subdivision, special purpose, commercial and industrial properties. Have qualified and testified as an expert witness in Hennepin County District Court. Have also been appointed a commissioner for Hennepin County District Court. IV. CLIENTS Appraisal and consultation assignments completed for attorneys representing clients, various national and local corporations, employee relocation companies, financial institutions, investors, various government agencies, prospective sellers, buyers, and others. Some of these are: Associates Relocation Services, Better Homes & Gardens Real Estate Service, Coldwell Banker Relocation Management Services, Corporate Transfer Service, Corporate Relocation Services, Eastman Kodak Company, Empire of America Relocation Services, Inc., Executive Relocation Corporation, FBS Mortgage, Federal National Mortgage Association(FNMA), First Bank Lake, Gen Rel Relocation Management Group; ICA Mortgage Corp., Knutson Mortgage & Financial Corp., Lender's Service Inc., Lomas Mortgage USA, Maenner Relocation Inc., Opus Corporation, PHH Homequity, Prudential Relocation Management, Relocation Resources Inc., Rothschild Financial,.State of Minnesota Department of Administration, Department of Natural Resourses, Department of.Transportation, Transequity Inc., Travelers Relocation, U.S.:West Relocation Services, United Mortgage Corp., Verex Assurance, Western Relocation. The purpose of the appraisals were for condemnation, insurance, employee transfers, estate settlement, taxation, mortgages, foreclosure, divorce settlement, marketing, acquisition, rental value, leasehold interest, etc. Vicinity Map A t 570 0 621 6700 6620 I 6616 FIELD •&I 01 6621 6617 6620 I 606 I 6 6617 I 6G 33 Ci 2t 661.6 1 6GI2 " I i ' AMERICAN iISH f fEAF000 - -�� SNETANA COURT I m I I p PARKING RAMP � I 7 r •O 5�% A AREA PLAN o•n +own • . • P H P COMPLEE. AREA PLAN 1 ..� � 1� Irr ., I ) RESIDE 1 � 1� r I NTILL NEIGHBORHOODS EO NB DYSINESf i0. 1 \\�`�_ •1\ I / -- —.I _.O•va / ; % WETLAND GREEN /l r _ S600BUILOING f/ • ,a DDr f J I L ITE'PIAI: SHEET Iil _ o� ( P� rowE�1 1 �I -• ; 1 � fJ(� IS �I MORTN \IIJ J /// l• I. II�'� �I'' J 0 25 IOD S00 i AREA SECTION A -A PROPOSED DASHED IIIDICATES APPROX. HEIGHT SfOD OUILDII+D -� MOHGPOLE • -y OF TREES AND BRUSH 5606. RESIDENCE RCA PLAN aw,y — TIM, CANI-l'IU -11; Iil_A SECTION A A MINHY169.YT 5600 LINCOLN DNVC NEMECTOR GROUP. IfJC. .. ! EDINA. MINNESOTA u5, wl:a IawvLG\pt [J IOYI•, i1Q. O_ 2 SITE PLAN TO [DINA BYSINESS CEIITER PLRRINO_ S600 LINCOLN DRIVE PROPOSED MONOPOLE' IT L • I I 1-' LOADING DOCKS QEQUIP. BLOC SOUTH ELEVATION ►ARKIIIG 3100 LINCOLN DRIVE ST20 LINCOLN DRIVE NORTH SITE PLAN I = T- 0 23 50 200 f� DIRECTIONAL ANTENNAS, 4-1 1 PROPOSED MONOPOLE EXISTING BUILDING SIGH —\ . \ EQUIP. BLDG \i • / / L WETLANDS L BRUSH�Z /4 I • DIRECTIONAL ANTENNAS, 4-1 1 PROPOSED MONOPOLE EXISTING BUILDING SIGH —\ . \ EQUIP. BLDG \i • L ;OUThI ELEVATION LOADINGDOCKITVP•I• ' O ,0 23 so TC PLAN o TIIE CArlsrrom Grour. INc. i d���E _a�PTERL , T :rL IX.. ►nLL�f I )UTI'I ELL -NATION n,11NHV,69•XT - •-- -.-..- .�.,.. —�. I 5600 LINCOLN DRIVE NEW✓ECTOR GROUP. INC. EDBIA. MINNESOTA US. WEST PEW VECTOR GROUP, INC. •' �•"�' I ,....t.�, .n. -Q ELEVATION /STRUCTURE PLAN (9) &' PtXEGTWNAL ANTENNA$ gg' �1L L• ro I' vl¢6GTia+el. eN�ur+ss rot CELLULAR. rFL&PHONELS I PROPOSED MONOPOLE EXISTING BUILDING �i t Mouo PIOL — NEW fLH14TING5 f t STP1R� = r _— 1 I TI G CIA= — - NE:w GRADE 96' KEYMME MASONRY _ RETAINLNC WAIL .PROPOSED BUILDING 0 1 SOUTH ELEVATIOl LOCATION 0 amm 0 RD CT. 1 r• •. ' r h"S� 0 amm 0 RD CT. FOUNTAINW000 AP-TS- VARIANCE NUMBER' B -91 -2 MAP .:.NU N� •'NUT DOGE • . �� .. :.. RK` 4? EL MILL! f 10NAL A LOCATION 5600 Lincoln Drive REQUEST A 46 foot front yard setback variance, a 23 foot height variance, a 16 foot front yard setback variance. EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT r• •. ' r FOUNTAINW000 AP-TS- VARIANCE NUMBER' B -91 -2 MAP .:.NU N� •'NUT DOGE • . �� .. :.. RK` 4? EL MILL! f 10NAL A LOCATION 5600 Lincoln Drive REQUEST A 46 foot front yard setback variance, a 23 foot height variance, a 16 foot front yard setback variance. EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT EDINA BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS STAFF REPORT FEBRUARY 7, 1991 B -91 -2 U.S. Aest'New Vector Group 5600 Lincoln Drive That part of Lot 1, Lying in the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 31, Township 117,,Range 21, Lot 1, Block 1, Prestige 2nd Addition zoning: PID, Planned Industrial District Request: A 46 foot front yard setback variance for an antenna tower. A 23 foot height variance for the antenna'tower. A 16 foot front yard setback variance for a utility building. The U.S. West New Vector Group has submitted an application to construct a 90 foot high antenna tower on top of which will be mounted nine directional antennas, for a total installation height of 98 feet and to install a 12' X 36' prefabricated equipment building near the base of the antenna. The proponent is intending to locate the antenna tower and equipment building within the front yard setback area of property located within a PID, Planned - Industrial zoning district at 5600 Lincoln Drive. The U.S. West New Vector Group is applying for the following variances to obtain an permit for their request: 1. A 23 foot height variance to allow an antenna tower to exceed the maximum allowable antenna height of 75 feet. 2. A 43 foot front yard setback variance to allow the proposed antenna tower to encroach into the front yard setback area. The required front yard setback for,the PID district is 50 feet or building height whichever is greater,. 3. A 16 foot front yard setback variance to allow an equipment building to be located within 34 feet of the front yard property boundary. Issues and Analysis Surrounding Land Use. The following adjacent land use are proximate to the subject site: North: Property to the north of the subject site is zoned planned industrial district and is the location of the Edina Business Center. Property located northeast of the site in question consists of the nine mile creek wildlife area and single family homes zoned R -1, single family residential zoning.district. South: Property located south of the subject property is zoned planned industrial district and consists of two industrial use buildings. East: Property located east of the subject,site is zoned R -1, single family residential zoning district and consists of the nine mile creek wildlife area and single family homes beyond. Property 'to the southeast of the subject site is zoned R =2, double dwelling unit district and consists of two family side by -side housing units. West: Property located to the west of the subject site consists of the highway 169 right -of -way, the American Fish and Seafood building, and the PHP building and parking ramp. Impact:. The proposed antenna would be visible from all aforementioned properties. The utility building would be visible only from the property zoned PID district to the south. Zoning Issues: The applicant has stated the particular site location is dictated by market demand of cellular phone users and engineering constraints. Basically an antenna site is chosen based on the following criteria: 1. The area chosen must be between a 1/2 mile to one mile away from other cellular antennas within the system. (approximately). 2. The area chosen must be of compatible land forms and appropriate elevations so as not to interfere with coverage area. 3. The area chosen should be compatibly zoned for the use. 4. The area chosen must be available for a reasonable purchase price or lease option. The applicant has chosen the site in question based on the previously mentioned criteria. An agreeable combination of those circumstances has determined the subject site the most "ideal location" for their purposes. Staff submits however,•that strict enforcement of the ordinance requirements would not cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property. Instead it appears that circumstances for the variance request have been created by the very nature of the cellular telephone business. In addition, it is evident that an antenna tower would visually impact neighboring property owners and may alter the residential character of the surrounding R -1 and R -2 neighborhoods. The particular use as described would be allowed within the PID district so it cannot be stated that the ordinance does not allow the "reasonable use" of the property for antenna purposes. It should be noted that there are currently two competing cellular telephone companies in the metro area. Both of these cellular telephone companies have had substantial increases in their customer base over the past few years. Increases in the number of users translates into the need for additional antenna towers for both companies. As such, approval of the variance' request would set a precedence for similar requests to come forward in -the future. The Board should also consider that there are other businesses that use antennas so the potential for requests would not be limited.to cellular phone companies. Variances: The following describe and analyze the submitted variance requests: Variance for structure height: All antenna towers are limited in height to 75 feet in the PID district. In addition, all ground towers in residential R -1 and R -2 zoning districts are limited to 50 feet in height. . Therefore, the proposed tower would be approximately one third taller than those allowed in PID districts and nearly fifty percent taller than those allowed in neighboring R -1 and R -2 districts. Staff contends that.the variance for height is excessive and would visually impact neighboring property owners. Variance for setback of the tower: The applicant contends that the required front yard setback for the tower is 50 feet. The zoning ordinance states that front yard setbacks must be maintained at 50 feet or building height which ever is greater. Staff contends that the building height setback requirement was adopted to insure that taller structures would have less impact on surrounding properties. Staff contends that the antenna should technically be setback 98 feet (structure height) from the front yard property boundary. Staff submits that a 43 foot front yard setback variance is excessive and defeats the purpose of reducing the visual impact of taller structures. In addition, staff has not identified a hardship demonstrated by the property that would support the location of the tower in the front yard setback area. Variance for setback of the equipment building. The equipment building would be screened from view from all sides with the exception of the south facade, which faces a PID use.. A similar front yard setback variance had been granted for the building to the south.,. Staff could support the front yard setback request for the equipment building based on the precedent set by the building setback to the south and based on the minimal impact the building would have on surrounding properties, however, a hardship is not recognized for said location. Conclusion: Staff recommends denial of the height and setback variances for the antenna tower and equipment building due to the following existing conditions: 1. The applicant has not sufficiently demonstrated "that the_ property could not be put to reasonable use without approval of this particular variance request. Conditions for requiring a variance are due to the nature of the cellular telephone business and not by conditions present on the 'site. 2. The antenna tower height is excessive and would have a negative visual impact on surrounding properties. 3. A precedent would be established if the variances were to be approved allowing similar request to be submitted. Staff acknowledges the needs of the applicant and their desire to provide improved cellular telephone service and would suggest examining an ordinance amendment to address these issues. 1 AMERICAN & SEAFOi SMETANA COURT PARKING RAMP CZZD AREA PLAN POND I m ---------- 0 25 100 500 RESIDENTIAL EDINA BUSINESS :TR. PARKING WETLANDS & BRUSH tl I PROPOSEEr $600 BUILDING MONOPOLE I EQUIP. iBUILDINPI SITE PLAN: SHEET #2 1 TRUCK DOCKS f/ PARKING r� I i j 1 T 5700 LINCOLN DRIVE \5 LA MONTH (D 5720 LINCOLN DRIVE 3 5700 LINCOLN DRIVE PARKING 5600 LINCOLN DRIVE (� TO EDINA BUSINESS CENTEit PROPOSED MONOPOLE, l Lam". !•ter i� 1---r a 1' [� LOADING DOCKS EQUIP. BLDG. PARKING 5720 LINCOLN DRIVE NORTH SI'D'E PLAN 1 zs s0 200 OFFICE TOWER . y PROPOSED P H P COMPLEX — - - 5600 BUILDING - - MONOPOLE .REA SEC"''TON A - A WkTLAkDS ddUSH 3 I1 �, � L�1 1 DASHED INDICATES APPROX. HEIGHT OF TREES AND BRUSH 5608 RESIDENCE DIRlOTIOMAL AMTEMMAs PBOVOSeD MONOPOLE �I�,., II EEISTDIO BOLL DING EIBM EDJIP. BLDG. SITE PLAN SOUTH ELEVATION Locam. MINHY 169 -XT 5600 LINCOLN DRIVE EDINA. MINNESOTA ...JCN wrc va iee� LDADEeD BODA ITTr•l • ._ �I��II/EST NEWVECIOH GROUP. INC. U.S. WEST NEWVECTOR GROUP, NC. :RI THE CA 6NN 4R7tl1 DWG le0.901 M, pvI ooa � nn 1" • � M • LANDSCAPING PLAN w"m F. _w-c - n z 0 V Z J 1f 1 Plant Material amm I w.r N. on eesryw I'3 � IOiG`�Eiel1EP oad. � ca�e� �rurrav� " 2 !�� 6RtiN 9talGi :� , b' D8 �IGFA f0F�6N6 Z " �!lQNnf+l� GfIO Z" bb -.. }�i 6nOND¢IPT GRAY, PLANT, MOOTY, MOOTY & BENNETT, P.A. INCLUDING THE FORMER FIRM OF HARSTAD & RAINBOW HAROLD G. CANT 11887 -1973) � HENRY W. H AV E R STOC K 1 1894 -1977) 3400 �ry� CITY CENTER ER FRANKLIN D. GRAY 11904 -1990) FRANK W. PLANT. JR. JOHN W. MOOTY MELVIN R. MOOTY SHEFFIELD WEST RUSSELL M. BENNETT CLINTON A. SCHROEDER C. ELAINE HARSTAD EDWARD J. CALLAHAN, JR. JAMES S. SIMONSON RICHARD N. FLINT CURTIS D. FORSLUND MAC LAY R.HYDE BRUCE D. GRUSSING C. STEVEN WILSON JOHN S. CROUCH DAVID T. BENNETT EDWIN C. CARPENTER LINDLEY S. BRANSON JOHN W. THIEL ALBERT ANDREWS. JR. NOEL P. MULLER DOUGLAS R. RAINBOW FRANKLIN C. JESSE, JR. DAVID L. WHITE BRUCE E. KIERN AT DANIEL R. SHULMAN MICHAEL R. CUNNINGHAM ROBERT P. LARSON THOMAS L. JOHNSON RICHARD A. MOORE, JR. WILLIAM L. KILLION . ELIZABETH W. NORTON JOHN E. BROWER THOMAS DARLING JOHN M. NICHOLS MARTHA A. VAN DE VEN MARY BETH BRODY EDWIN R, HOLMES DAVID N. MOOTY RICHARD A. HACKETT WILLIAM D. KLEIN SUSAN L. SEGAL NICHOLAS N. NIERENGARTEN JOHN L. KRENN STEPHEN R. EIOE JOHN D. GIUDICESSI, JR, KATHLEEN S. TILLOTSON MICHAEL C. FLOM DAVID C. BAHLS PHILLIP BOHL THIRTY THREE SOUTH SIXTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 -3796 TELEPHONE 612.343.1800 FAX 612.333.0066 TWX 910.576.2778 DIRECT DIAL 343 -2838 February 5, 1991 Edina Zoning Board of Appeals and Adjustments Attn: Jackie Hoogenakker 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Application by U.S. New Vector Group Case File B -91 -2 Gentlemen: 5616 site heari I am the owner o f Parkwood Lane wh i and, therefore, ng scheduled for, the sin ch lies I have re Thursday, gle -famil within 25 ceived a Februar JAMES F CARROLL ROBERT E. HARDING LAURA J. HEIN MYRON L. FRANS ERIK T. SALVESON RICHARD G. BRAMAN PENNY M. TIBKE NANCY QUATTLEBAUM BURKE WILLIAM J. FISHER VIRGINIA S. SCHUBERT GEORGE R. WOOD TAMARA HJELLE OLSEN LYNN B. NOLAND NANCY ROETMAN MENZEL OUENTIN R. WITTROCK ROBERTJ.MCREAVY DEAN A. LEDOUX GREGORY R.MERZ BRIAN B. SCHNELL WADE ANDERSON ARTHUR W. DICKINSON LAURA J. SCHOENSAUER VALERIE BOLES WAGONER RICK E. KUBLER TIMOTHY M. BURKE y residence 1 0 feet of the notice of a y 7,. 1991. BARBARA E. TRETHEWAY TROY A. BADER EDWARD A- GARVEY MARA R. THOMPSON MARK E. MULHOLLAM NANCYJ. MILLER STACY A. LEVIN SUSAN DECKER LENCZEWSKI CHARLOTTE. A. KIMBALL GINA B. SAUER WILLIAM R. PECK JOHN G.'SHULMAN TERRY M. WALCOTT OFCOUNSEL ROBERT L. HELLAND D. JAMES NIELSEN DANIELS. VENTRES. JR. ROBERT A. STEIN DAVID M. COYNE BETSY B.BAKER ocated at subject public The purpose of this letter is to advise the Edina Zoning Board of Appeals and Adjustments that it is my view of applicable Minnesota case law that the variances requested by U.S. West New Vector Group may not be lawfully granted and, therefore, the subject application should be denied. In this regard, it is clear that variances cannot be granted unless th ordinance results in a hardship and, report in this matter dated February evidence that the application of the circumstance which is recognizable in JSC:jmh 3808x , under Minnesota e application of as is clear from 7, 1991, there i s ordinance create the law as a ha Very truly yours, o h n S�.0 r 0 ud h law, the the staff no s any rdship. N'71 Gk's . GL >,y� yl.�tG� z �' • � / Zd ✓J�'r- 2c',•)( ��' �, . �i ^. L.�i�jvY` -CL �.G•Y, � L' `-� ?Gs 2c'�Z�'C �ci�'7'L � � - GL� -C'K l � L�'L � lj -CQ-4% � /jY ✓r'� �� � <2t-- y.-� `> �' ✓ GYj / Q -41wP '-�T �1GCG G�/7YLGCC�� ""L 7•-- To- V17 v ✓yam ��.e�- �^ >> -ze��� u�`� -- l� � Tv,Le��, c.0 �f we Al c C. �4��� �aUH•c+ � i�L � � 5��/3 � c� � N, . Aj L4, If kl LL// � ,� -S - QI -- - - - _ lei � ���/ r'.G� �- �d�?"✓1''aM_G ; ,��,� � Cv►')1 liJ- 'u,�?�",s�� 2'Y� ,�,,�; � ,tit; �t. �}"�o�l «. J c��PCUL V ems; Lj a- (j- e . cc. rr2cc C (, Zoe �YY�� • ri� S'71'� -4.� � �'�- C�- c�iL�� -r G � �Y�- R�L��' v "r a,ve, v a.ea, y-4- . YY� P coo vim, M "q s S- y 36 S Case i3— 9/ _ 2- . Gv-e Cc/�..er cam- a,, � c�-e y , LEVANDER, ZOTALEY, VANDER LINDEN & RYDLAND A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION i. LAWYERS 720 NORTHSTAR WEST 625 MAROUETTE AVENUE MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 (612) 339 -6841 BERNHARD W. LEVANDER BYRON L. ZOTALEY JAMES G. VANDER LINDEN ROBERT H. RYDLAND DAVID C. WULFF ELIZABETH R. BOYD _ Mr. Fred S. Richards 7225 Fleetwood Drive Edina, Minnesota 55435 Ms. Jane L. Paulus 4617 Moorland Avenue Edina, Minnesota 55424 Mr. Glenn L. Smith 5717 Susan Avenue Edina, Minnesota 55435 February 21, 1991 Ms. Peggy Kelly 22 Circle West Edina, Minnesota 55436 Mr. Bernard G. Rice 4801 Hilltop Lane Edina, Minnesota 55424 - RE: Parkwood Knolls Ten Story Cellular Phone Tower Variance Case File No. B -91--2 Dear Mayor and City Council Persons: LEGAL ASSISTANTS LORENA M. MITCHELL R. MARTIN TUZINSKI FAX (612) 339 -5765 ABA /NET: ABA1842 I am writing you today after having met with Planning Department staff this morning regarding the request of U.S. West to build the 10 -story Cellular Phone Tower just across the street from the Parkwood Knolls residential neighborhood of Edina. I am writing you to uphold the unanimous denial of the Petition for Variances made by the Edina Zoning Board of Appeals and Adjustments on February 7, 1991. It is my understanding that the tower's proponents have scheduled" their appeal of this matter to come before you at 7:00 p.m. on Monday, March 4, 1991. I am writing you, not only on my own behalf, but also at the request and on the behalf of my neighbors, Mr. and Mrs. Adam Stanzak, 5600 Parkwood Lane; Mr. and Mrs. Edward E. Powers, 5500 Parkwood Lane; and Mr. and Mrs. Stanley G. Petzel, 5509 Parkwood Lane. We have resided at our present addresses for 17 years, 11 years, 27 years, and 15 years respectively. None of us have recieved to date any notification whatsoever of the prior City proceedings before the Zoning Board of Appeals and Adjustments: If we had known, we certainly would have been at the prior meetings and voiced our opposition to the proposal as our homes are directly affected. February 21, 1991 Paste Two The proposed tower stands as tall as a 10 -story building. Its location directly behind the Stanzak home, will put if visually into all of our living rooms.and visually pollutes not only the use and enjoyment of our interiors but also our outdoor family, recreation-areas. The Stanzak's did receive an invitation by the proponent to a private meeting which I also attended at the City Hall on January 25. At that time the proponent was provided with the names and addresses of affected property owners, including myself, the Powers and the Petzel's as well as others. We were assured by the proponent and its lawyers that we would all receive timely notices as to official hearings with the City. We are all disappointed that the proponent obviously never followed through on this simple commitment. In any event, I think it is important to note that those who attended the private meeting on January 25, were unanimously opposed to the building of this tower across the street from Parkwood Knolls. We were told by the proponents representatives that for technical reasons they needed to build a new tower some place in the area of the Crosstown and 169/18. It was pointed out to them that more than 75% of the surrounding .land area to that intersect was commercial and industrial. When questioned why they had chosen a site, which was just across the street from one of Edina's finest residential neighborhoods, the answer which we were given was that no other commercial site would have them. When asked why they felt that such a visual pollution of our residential neighborhood should be accepted when the majority of-commercial property owners had rejected them, they had no answer. When specific suggestions were given to them as to other possible commercial sites in the general area which they seek, their response was that they had not thought of those sites or made any inquiries into them. They left the distinct impression that they had worked out such a sweet financial deal with the property owner at 5600 Lincoln Drive, that they really had little or no concern about the negative impact they would create for the homeowner at 5600 Parkwood Lane or any of the other residential properties which would be negatively impacted. I think the bottom line of all this is very clear and. can be summarized as follows: 1) The tower proponent simply has not done its homework. It has many potential alternate sites, that would have little or no impact on Parkwood Knolls or any other residential neighborhood of Edina. 2) The tower proponent seeks to build its structure more than twice the height that would otherwise be legally .permissible in an R1 or 2 setting. February 21, 1991 Paste Three 3) The tower proponent is not not satisfied with the 7 1/2- story limitation which it gains by stepping across the street. It insists on going to 10- stories. 4) The tower proponent seeks not only a height variance to accomplish its purpose, but also a setback variances. Instead of proposing to build their tower on the Westerly end of 5600 Lincoln Drive, thus placing it at the furthest possible distance away from the residential neighborhood and closest to 169, it seeks to place it on the Easterly end of the property at the closest point to the residential neighborhood and then requests a second variance to come even closer than would normally be allowed. This type of visual pollution should never be tolerated in any community which prides itself in its residential nature, visual amenities and quality of life. The homeowners of Parkwood Knolls have gone to great expense over the years to comply with many ordinances focused on eliminating visual pollution. What purpose does it serve to have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars over the years to bury our electric and telephone line services in the ground in order so as to get rid of overhead wires and poles only to now come back and build a 10 -story tower which will be visible over blocks and blocks of Parkwood Knolls? Your unanimous vote unanimously dening of the proponents Petition for Variances is requested. Very truly yours, Byron L. Zotaley 5504 Parkwood Lane Edina, Minnesota 55436 933 -5333 BLZ /lau / cc: Edina Planning Department v Mr. and Mrs. Edward E. Powers, 5500 Parkwood Lane Mr. and Mrs. Rudy Luther, 5608'Parkwood Lane Mr. 'and Mrs. Stanley G. Petzel, 5509 Parkwood Lane Mr. and Mrs. Adam P. Stanzak, 5600 Parkwood Lane Dr. and Mrs. Ekren Gozum, 6616 Parkwood Road Mr. and Mrs. Mario Bognanno, 6620 Parkwood Road Mr. and Mrs. William G. Mueller, 6617 Parkwood Road Mr. and Mrs'. James L. Phelps, 6612 Parkwood Road. Mr. and Mrs. Andrew E. Montgomery, 6628 Parkwood Road Mr. and Mrs. Edward J. Kocourek, 6636 Parkwood Road Dr. and Mrs. William Dorsey, 6624 Parkwood Road RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City'of Edina is essentially fully developed; and WHEREAS, the City Council is of the belief that there will be an ever increasing demand for towers, antennas, and dish antennas (as defined in Ordinance No. 812 of the City) to be erected in the City for cellular telephones and other kinds of communication, with results that may be detrimental, in many respects, to the value of adjoining properties and to the quality.and character of the affected neighborhood and the City as a whole; and WHEREAS, the City Council believes that the ordinances and Comprehensive Plan of the City may not be adequate to guide future erection, location, size and use of such towers, antennas and dish antennas, without detriment to the City or its citizens, and further believes that it is desirable to review the plans and ordinances of the City to determine if any changes or amendments should be made to the procedures and criteria for approving and allowing erection, including location, size and use of such towers, antennas, and dish antennas in the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City staff is hereby authorized and directed to conduct studies of the applicable plans and ordinances of the City, and to give information to, and make recommendations to, the City Council relative to the need and desirability, if any, for adopting or amending the plans and ordinances of the City relative to restricting, regulating or controlling the erection, location, size and use of such towers, antennas, and dish antennas within the City, and if needed or desired, the terms and conditions of.such restrictions, regulations and controls. ADOPTED this 4th day of March, 1991. el A. o e �, >1rJ. ` �o REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KENNETH ROSLAND Agenda Item # -IL. D. From: KRIS AAKER Consent ; i Information Only ❑ i Date: MARCH 4, 1991 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: C-91-1, REQUEST TO T To Council , RECONSIDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, HENNEPIN Action T Motion COUNTY LIBRARY.- 7001 YORK AVENUE SOUTH I Resolution i Ordinance. j I_! Discussion Recommendation: Info/Background- Representatives of Southdale Library have asked to appear before the Council to request that the Council reconsider issuance of a Conditional Use Permit denied by the Council on February 19, 1991. The Zoning ordinance provides for Council reconsideration upon a 3/5 favorable vote following "evidence of a change of facts or circumstances affecting the proposed use ". Attached are revised plans submitted by the county supporting their request. The plans illustrate the addition of a "drive -thru" book drop off, and a revised parking lay -out which eliminates parking within the required 20 foot parking setback area. 02/26/91 08:92 FAX 612 541 7984 DDO FTPROPERTY MANAGEMENT A -2208 Government Center HENNEPIN Minneapols, Minnesota 55487 -0228 LFIJ February 26, 1991 City of Edina 4801.West Fiftieth Street Edina, Minnesota 55425 Attention: City Council Re: Southdale Library Conditional Use Permit Members of the Council: As attachments to this letter, we - are offering certain changes to our original permit and request consideration for approval during the'March 4 meeting. The primary change is a plan to alleviate book return Inconveniences. We have also included the parking scheme that avoids the variance requested in the - original submittal. The new architectural solution has a drive -up book drop included as a part of a new book receiving room. This new 450 square foot room within the footprint of the library is located 'at the existing night book deposit. Besides the added drive -up convenience for the public this space will help to support the increase in circulated. volumes anticipated because of - the enlarged facility. We trust that these ideas are looked upon favorably and in the mutual interest of the community and the library. With both parking schemes now presented we remain dedicated to our original Scheme A but in the interest of time and project priorities we will defer to the wish of council vote, be it Scheme or SchAMg., j. Sincerely, Raymo d f. John , Architect - Project Manager Property Management Department B. Thiede Area Library Division Fennepin County Library HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opporfunlfy emplover Tod 1W9W Al 2L3d021d Ala NN3H WK0se0 T6. 92 -63J 12002 Transmittal Letter Fax Mail Messenger Overnight UPS Other Ve1 wPr, To: Drec,r r pt F'►�hn�r� C, b, o-f EGl iv) ok tdina , MN 55424 From: e-�-F KielIe>� Project Name: ',:L�QU th6i2l 1P. U1 b-f0A f 0 MS &R Meyer, Scherer & Rockcastle, Ltd. Architects 325 Second Avenue North Minneapolis, MN 55401 -1601 Phone: 612 - 375 -0336 Fax: 612- 342 -2216 Date: Time: Fax: Phone: 21�eb-Ii1611 No. of Pages: Project No.: 0) D 34 Copies Date Description 1212.010 }- �.•2�•�1 - & Iz. 1 , 1= c� t Door Finn 1 2 2b q L&e.-(- - rorr, He)nn C+1 rt: rewns,'Atfol ho S of Co ml • L/I ile4nm t r6 j"est Copies to-2-( F) kO V, 01 NE Dorr,e r Remarks: �Qr Co► -,5� ol,�ca -ham b� fie, Cot) Mp)vc- -, 4 � lalm Cov►n C/i 1 o n o e ":.' 71 ch ��A �� REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: GORDON L. HUGHES ASSISTANT MANAGER Date: MARCH 4, 1991 - Subject: SALE OF STRONG BEER IN RESTAURANTS HOLDING WINE LICENSES Recommendation: Info /Background: Agenda Item # III- Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution EE Ordinance ❑ Discussion On March 4, 1991, the City Council will conduct a Public Hearing concerning the sale of strong beer in restaurants which hold wine licenses. In accordance with your request, we have published a legal notice concerning this hearing in our official newspaper. In addition, the Edina Sun Current published an article on February 20, 1991, concerning the March 4, 1991, hearing (copy of article attached). We have also provided notice of this hearing to the Edina Ministerial Association, the Edina Public Schools and the Edina Chamber of Commerce. If the Council wishes to authorize the sale of strong beer in restaurants holding wine licenses, it should direct staff to prepare the necessary amendment to Edina Ordinance #902. A draft of this Ordinance amendment can be prepared and submitted for your consideration at the March 18, 1991, Council meeting or at a future Council meeting of your choosing. The Council, if it wished, could consider the adoption of this ordinance amendment without the need for further public hearings. Attached to this (over) Report /Recommendation March 4, 1991 Page Two memo is a November 28, 1990, letter from Tom Erickson. This letter provides a general overview of the laws relative to the sale of beer, wine, and intoxicating liquor. Also attached is a letter dated February 26, 1991, from Bravo!, 3910 W. 50th Street, which supports amending City ordinances to permit the sale of strong beer. At this writing, we have received no other written correspondence or telephone calls concerning the March 4, 1991, hearing. DORSEY & WHITNEY A PA— K.aHI► INCLDD -0 PROF.Sl.ONIL I. 21T1ON! 350 PARE AVENUE NEW TORE. NEW YORK 10022 =200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST 201 FIRST AVENUE, S. W., SUITE 340 212)415 -9200 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 -1498 ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 55902 507)288 -3156 1330 CONNECTICUT AVENUE. N. W. (6I2) 340 -2600 WASHINGTON. D. C. 20036 TELEX 29-0603 (202) 837 -0700 1200 FIRST INTERSTATE CENTER - FAX (612) 340-2868 BILLINGS, MONTANA 59103 3 GRACECHURCH STREET (406)252-3800 LONDON EC3V OAT, ENGLAND 44 -71- 929 -3334 38, RUE - TWMAS S, ZRICKSON 201 DAVIDSON BUILDING 75009 PARIS. PRANCE IS. FRANC GREAT FALLS, MONTANA 59401 33-1- 42-66 -59-48 (g12) 340-2M l (406) 727 -3632 45, RUE DE THEVES - B -1040 BRUSSELS. BELGIUM 127 EAST FRONT STREET 32- 2-238 -78 -11 MISSOULA, MONTANA 59802 ' (406) 721-6025 November 28, 1990 Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland City Manager City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Re: On -Sale of Intoxicating Liquor in the City Dear Mr. Rosland: The Edina Chamber of Commerce has asked that the City adopt an ordinance authorizing the holder of an on -sale wine license, who is also licensed to sell 3.2 beer at on -sale, and whose gross receipts are at least 60% attributable to the sale of food, to sell intoxicating malt liquor (strong beer) at on -sale without an additional license. Such an ordinance is allowed by Minnesota Statutes, Section 340A.404, subdivision 5(b). As I previously advised the Council, there is no definition of "intoxicating malt liquor" in the state statute (Chapter 340A). There is, however, a definition of "intoxicating liquor" which includes all beverages, including malt beverages containing more than 3.2 percent of alcohol by weight (strong beer). Though not defined, I am `of the opinion, that the reference to "intoxicating malt liquor" is restrictive enough to permit under such an ordinance only the sale of strong beer and not other kinds of "intoxicating liquor." The Council desires to hold a public hearing on the matter. Based on my conversations with you I thought it advisable to give you this letter setting forth some provisions of the applicable Minnesota state statutes relative to the issuance of on -sale intoxicating liquor licenses (and not. just strong beer licenses), and elections required in connection therewith in case the topic comes up. (over) A DORSEY & WHIT`: EY Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland November 28, 1990 Page 2 Allowing, by ordinance, the holder of an on -sale wine license, who also holds an on -sale 3.2 beer license and whose gross receipts are at least 60% attributable to the sale of food, to sell strong beer, does not require that there be any special hearing or any special election prior to, or as a condition to, adoption of the ordinance. In such case, the statute does not require that any license be actually issued for the sale of strong beer; the statute authorizes the sale of strong.beer simply by the holding of other licenses (i.e .', on -sale wine, on -sale 3.2 beer and food licenses). If the City desires to do more than adopt an ordinance under . Section 340A.404, subd. 5(b), then the so-called "split liquor" procedure is established by Section 340A.601. This allows the issuance of licenses for the on -sale of intoxicating liquor to hotels, clubs and restaurants, while yet allowing the City to operate its municipal liquor stores. The statutory definitions of hotels, clubs and restaurants is attached. The City may impose restrictions and regulations in addition to those in the statute. The issuance of licenses under the "split liquor" option is not allowed, however, until "authorized by the voters of the city voting on the question at a special election called for that purpose." There are no provisions in the statute as to how the election is to be conducted or what kind of vote is required for authorization. However, Minnesota Statutes, Section 205.10 does provide for city special elections. It allows special elections on any question on which the voters are authorized by law to pass judgment. This would presumably include the split liquor option. The statute further provides that the special election may be ordered by the city council on its own motion or, if it's a question that has not been submitted to the voters within the previous six months, upon a petition signed by the number of voters equal to 20% of the votes cast at the last municipal general election. The statute is not clear, but seems to say that the question is carried with only a majority in its favor. Election officials for the special election are to be the same as for the most recent municipal general election unless changed according to law, and otherwise a special election shall be conducted and returns made in the manner provided for the municipal general election. However, even if the citizens vote for the split- liquor licensing, the issuance of licenses is still at the discretion of the City Council and is to be done pursuant to a duly adopted ordinance. DOBSEY 4c WHITNEY Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland November 28, 1990 Page 3 I trust this letter is responsive to your inquiry. If there are any further questions or if I can be of any further help with respect to this matter, please let me know. • Very truly yours, f , Thomas S. Erickson TSE:kks (over) Subd. 7. Club. "Club" is an incorporated organization organized under the laws of the state for civic, fraternal, social, or business purposes,_ for intellectual improvement, or for the promotion of sports, or a congressionally chartered veterans' organization, which: (1) has more than 50 members; (2) has owned or rented a building or space in a building for more than one year that is suitable. and adequate for the accommodation of its members; (3) is directed by a board of directors, executive committee, or other similar body chosen by the members at a meeting held for that purpose. No member, officer, agent, or employee shall receive any profit from the distribu- tion or sale of beverages to the members of the.club, or their guests, beyond a reasonable salary or wages fixed and voted each year by the governing body. Subd. 13. Hotel. "Hotel" is an establishment where food and lodging are regularly furnished to transients and which has: (1) a resident proprietor or manager; (2) a dining room serving the general public at tables and having facilities for seating at least 30 guests at one time; and (3) guest rooms in the following minimum numbers: ' 11 O.L in second class eities, 25; ' Subd. 23. Restaurant. "Restaurant" is an establishment, other than a motel, under the control of a single proprietor or manager, where meals are cgularly served at tables to the general public, and having seating capacity for guests in the following minimum numbers: (a) Fift! Blass e'7vs. ........ so (b) Second and third class cities and statutory 00 cities of over 10,0 population ..... .......:....................... ......30 , of L Woods, d st &OW-6 eetlnliee In the case of classes (b) and (c) above, the governing body of a city or county may prescribe a higher minimum number. In fourth class cities and statutory cities under 10,000 population, minimum seating requirements are those prescribed by the governing body of the city. Sul scrib Su ferm, NotN Antonio Cecconi's An n � R- - A�V=-- C %) =9= R i s t o r a n t e Italia no 3910 West 50th Street • Edina, MN 55424 • (612) 922 -5815 TO: City Council, City of Edina RE: Proposal for strong beer February 26, 1991 In response to the public hearing March 4 I submit the following letter. I strongly approve of the proposed on -sale of strong beer for restaurants already licensed for 3.2 and wine. What we would gain from this is not so much additional sales but an increased positive perception from current and potential customers. We have lost many potential customers for banquets and eat -in business when they realized strong beer was not available. It frankly has been an enigma to think we can sell a glass or bottle of wine but not "real" beer. Try to explain that to a customer! In regards-.to concerns about serving alcohol, in nearly six . years of having a 3.2 license and nearly two years with a wine license I cannot recall one incident of dealing with a customer who may have been inebriated. The vast majority of people want to compliment their Italian pasta with a glass of wine or their pizza with a beer. I honestly cannot see any harm out of this proposal - only good in creating a positive atmosphere for restaurant businesses in Edina. Sincerely, l � � Antonio Cecconi (over) Council could Mow sale of strong beer Hearing is set By Mary Durben Should Edina restaurants that now serve wine be allowed to serve strong beer — beer con- taining more than 3.2 percent alcohol? That question will be discuss- ed in a public hearing at 7 p.m. March 4 in the City Hall Council Chambers. Testimony at the hearing will help the Edina City Council decide whether to take advan- tage;of a new state law giving ci- ty eouncils authority to extend that privilege to wine license holders. Food would still have to account for at least 60 percent of the restaurants' total sales. The Edina Chamber of Com- merce has asked the council to make the change so that restaurants can serve imported and specialty beers, which have gained popularity in recent years. That would improve their ability to compete with restaurants in neighboring com- munities, the Chamber maintains. In the past, requests to extend liquor sales have been very con - troversial and have been settled by referendums. This time, however, the coun- cil members have said they would prefer to avoid the cost of a referendum, but they would not decide the matter without public comment. Residents are being encourag- ed to comment at the public hearing, and written comments will also be accepted. Virginia Bodine, executive director of the Chamber, said the sale of wine in restaurants was overwhelmingly approved by votes in a 1984 advisory H>FARIMG: To page 2.A .: , . ,6 PUBLISHED IN THE EDINA SUN CURRENT - February..20, 1991 Hearing Flom previous page referendum. "People are not going to ob- ject to restaurants serving im- Ported beer," she said. "The Chamber feels this is a good time to ask because the state has approved it." Bodine said the Chamber will try to correct some common misperceptions about strong beer. "People's perception is that strong beer is 6 percent alcohol, but it's really about 4 percent," she said. "Wine is 14 percent alcohol, so a glass of wine is really the equivalent of a bottle of strong beer." Bodine said restaurants will .be able to meet the percentage of sales requirement easily; since sales are currently about 98 Percent food and 2 percent wine. People who order liquor at a restaurant must order a food, and a meal costs more than a glass of wine, she said. And many customers don't order alcoholic beverages. Bodine noted that the 1984 ad- visory referendums, which was held in conjunction with a Presidential election, on -sale wine licensing got more votes, than a mayoral candidate who was nursing unopposed. Wine sales were approved by a vote of 19,697 to 6,141. "I'm convinced that if strong beer had been on the ballot, it would have been approved," Bodine said. An earlier referendum on split -liquor sales fared less well, however. In February 1975. residents voted 4,233 to 2,028 not to allow the sale of hard liquor in restaurants and 4,160 to 2,024 not to allow liquor sales after noon on Sunday. Bodine said that referendum, which was supported by the Radisson South, was ill - conceived because it was hel conjunction with a school bM election, which typically drW few voters. People who were motivated to vote on the liquor issues generally were opposed to the questions on the ballot. Voters in . 1961 defeated the licensing of off -sale liquor stores by 5,015 to 183 votess. If the council preferred to have a referendum on the strong -beer issue, Bodine said it would have to wait until the next presidential election in 1992. The Chamber would have to raise money for the effort, she said — the business community paid the cost of the 1984 balloting and would be expected to do so again. And they would need the high voter tuunout of a presiden- tial contest. Bodine said Tour de France restaurant brought the new law to the Chamber's attention, and the Chamber board of directors passed a resolution to support the change. 04 March 1991 Edina City Council This written comment, solicited in Mary Durben's Edina Sun - Current article of 20 February'91, is to state our hope that the Council will not let strong beer be sold in the City. Council approval sends a message to our youth, that alcohol is "OK " ... a message that need be carefully assessed in this day of substance abuse. Respectfully submitted, Y-,U- � �wx_oe� Lee and Bob McLane 4527 Arden Avenue Edina, MN 55424 -1116 926 -9432 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE 4 March, 1991 AGENDA ITEM V. A. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Backhoe Attachment for Case Skid Loader Company Amount of Quote or &d 1• Case Power & Equipment $ 6,580.00 2• Case Power - Duluth 2. $ 8,279.00 3. ' 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Case Power & $ 6,580.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is a attachment for the Case skid loader, Unit 25 -411. The attaci:; :.c-,.;c is a small backhoe attachment for the equipment. The funds for this purchase are from the - equipment replacement fund. A - ignatur The Recommended bid is within budget not Public Works - Streets Rosland ktllplJa.e1_ Finance Director REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor and Council Members FROM: Chuck Peterson, Liquor Stores VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000 DATE: 3/01/91 AGENDA ITEM V • B Signature The Recommended bid is, X within budget not v Liquor Stores allin, Finance Director V Manager ITEM DESCRIPTION: Company _ Amount of Quote or &d 1. Sign Services Incorporated 1•$10,848.50 2. Lawrence Sign 2.'14,980.00 3. Universal Signs 3. 16,549.00 4. 4. 5:. = 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Sign Services Incorporated GENERAL INFORMATION: The preceding quotes are for an illuminated awning for the Yorkdale Liquor Store. The awning will be internally lit and reflect our new color scheme and liquor store logo. The awning will provide better lighting in front of the store for our customers and make the store more visible from York Avenue. Signature The Recommended bid is, X within budget not v Liquor Stores allin, Finance Director V Manager o e Cn lose REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Ken Rosland, Manager From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERIC Date: Ntarch 1, 1991 Subject: On -Sale Wine License and On -Sale 3/2 Beer License for Two Guys From Italy Restaurant, 7459 France Avenue So (Centennial La Recommendation: Agenda Item # VI-A Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Approval of issuance of an On -Sale Wine License and On -Sale 3.2 Beer License to Two Guys From Italy restaurant at 7459 France Avenue South. Info/Background- The City has received applications for both an On -Sale Wine License and an On -Sale 3.2 Beer License from Two Guys From Italy restaurant located at 7459 France Avenue South (Centennial Lakes), together with applications for two Manager's licenses. The applications have been reviewed by the Police, Health and Planning Departments and the necessary investigations have been conducted. Memorandums are attached from these departments in support of issuance of the On -Sale Wine License. The departments have also approved issuance of the beer license. Letters in support of the licenses are also attached. MW ,. M E M O R A N D U M 9 TO: Kenneth E. Rosland FROM: Craig G. Swanson SUBJECT: On -Sale Wine License DATE: February 22, 1991 The on -sale wine license application of the below - listed establishment has been investigated in accordance with applicable statutes and ordinances: Two Guys From Italy 7495 France Avenue South Edina, MN 55435 The findings of these investigations do not reveal information that is contrary to the public interest for the purpose of licensing. Therefore, I recommend the Council move to approve the application and issuance of an on -sale wine license for the establishment conditioned upon approval by the State of Minnesota, and instruct the City Clerk to forward the required documents to the State of Minnesota for their approval. r- CRAIG 3. SWANSON CHIE OF POLICE CGS:nah M E M 0 R U N D U M TO: KENNETH ROSLAND, MANAGER FROM: //Yy LLIOTT MARSTON, ASSISTANT SANITARIAN SUBJECT: ON -SALE WINE LICENSE APPLICATION DATE: MARCH 1, 1991 The on -sale wine license application for Two Guys From Italy, 7459 France Avenue South, Edina, MN has been reviewed by the Health Department. Our investigation of the premises finds that the subject restaurant complies with the requirements of Ordinance No. 902 with respect to seating capacity, food establishment license and appropriate storage and food handling space which is not adversely impacted by the storage and service of wine. I would recommend that the on -sale wine license be approved. 1 M E M O R A N D U M TO: KENNETH ROSLAND, MANAGER FROM: CRAIG LARSEN, PLANNER SUBJECT: ON -SALE WINE LICENSE APPLICATION DATE: MARCH 1, 1991 The on -sale wine application from Two Guys. From Italy, 7459 France Avenue South, Edina, MN has been reviewed by the Planning Department. The premises meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and I would recommend approval of.the license application. CITY OF �N,TE BEAR POLICE WWte Bear hake RESPONSE 911 February 25, 1991 Frederick Richards, Mayor City of Edina 4801 West 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Mayor: I am writing on behalf of Daniel A. Sarno and Two Guys From Italy restaurant. Two Guys From Italy is a well established restaurant in White Bear Lake. It has held a liquor license in our city since 1980. In 1989 Two Guys From Italy began to sell strong beer rather than 3.2 beer. This change had no adverse effects on the Police Dep'zrtment. I hope this information is helpful. If I can be of further assistance please don't hesitate to call. Sincerely Phi Ii J. Ma Chief of Pol ce 4700 MILLER AVENUE • WHITE BEAR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55110 • 429 -8511 Cit y of White, Bear Lake I� 4701 Highway 61, White Bear Lake, MN 55110 ' Fax (612) 429 -8500 * Phone (612) 429 -8526 December 10, 1990 Mr. Frederick Richards, Mayor City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Richards: I am pleased to have been asked by Daniel. Sarno to serve as a reference in support of his application for a liquor license in your community. I have served on the City Council and as Mayor for the more than seven years that Mr. Sarno has operated a restaurant in White Bear Lake and feel extremely comfort- able in recommending favorable approval of his application in your city. As owner and operator of Two Guys from Italy, Daniel has distinguished himself not only as an excellent restauranteur, but also an outstanding busi- nessman in our community. His restaurant *is one of the prides of our downtown area and an example of how to do things right. To my knowledge the business has never__ had difficulty complying with State and local liquor laws. Further, the business under Dan's management has been punctual in meeting all its.obliga- tions and has contributed greatly to various causes within our community. Besides all the formalities normally considered in reviewing a liquor license, I_ might add that Dan's business is always filled with friendly workers and they are renowned for serving some of the best Italian food in the region. Please accept my sincere and unreserved recommendation for favorable consider- ation of his liquor license. J mJ Sincerely, oe��� Q3 �o Has REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From Francis Hoffman City Engineer Date: 4 March, 1991 Subject: Public Hearings Sidewalks - Feasibility Report & Set Hearing Date Recommendation: Agenda Item * VI - B - Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 7 To Council Action [0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Set hearing date of March 18,-1991 or alternate date of April 1, 1991. Info/Background- The City of Edina has received three petitions for sidewalks in Edina. The locations and estimated cost proposed for the sidewalks are as follows: LOCATION COST Wooddale Ave. (East Side) from W. 50th St. to W. 56th St. $ 147,330.40 W. 66th St. (North Side) from France Ave. to Southdale $ 40,480.00 Medical Building Driveway Cornelia Dr. (West Side) from Cornelia School to W. 72nd St. $ 39,600.00 & W. 72nd St. (North Side) from Cornelia Dr. to Oaklawn Ave. The proposed projects have been reviewed and are considered feasible. The staff would suggest possible hearing dates of March 18, or April 1. The Council may wish to discuss City -wide sidewalk plans and policy for funding prior to the public hearings. If policy is to be discussed for the whole of the City, staff would recommend that discussion occur on March 18th, with the hearings to occur on April 1st, 1991. REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Ken Rosland From: Janet Chandler and David Velde Date: Plarch 4, 1991 Subject: Solid waste Collection Options Agenda Item # vl. c . Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance 0 Discussion Recommendation: options for Council: 1. Set a date for a public hearing, as the first step in the organized collection process, or 2. Direct staff to prepare a plan for a districting system, or 3. Take no action. Info/Background- on September 17, (copy of minutes attached) following a discussion on Edina waste disposal systems and costs, Council asked for a follow -up staff report after January 1, 1991. The question for discussion is whether either organized garbage collection, or a districting system, would be preferable to the open hauling system which Edina now has. This. report reviews and defines the options in waste collection systems and addresses the attendant policy issues. Attachments • September 17 Minutes • Letters from Residents • Hauler Response • News Clipping - Farmington system K DEFINITIONS Open Hauling: city licensed haulers can service any area of the city; property owners contract privately with the hauler of their choice. Districting: same as open hauling except the city requires that all solid waste be picked up on a certain day within each designated district. Organized Collection: the city contracts with a hauler or group of haulers to provide service for the entire city or section /s of the city. Organized Collection Legal Process: The Minnesota Waste Management Act requires the following 180 -day procedure prior to implementing organized collection. It is not required for districting. 1. Two week advance public notice, and mailed notice to all haulers of a public hearing to consider organized collection. 2. Following the public hearing, Council may adopt a resolution of intent to organize garbage collection. 3. A 90 -day planning period shall be spent working with the licensed haulers of the city to develop a collection plan agreeable to the city and the haulers. 4. :If,the city is unable to agree on a plan with the haulers within this 90 days, it may then propose an alternate plan. 5. The second 90 -day period shall be spent in evaluating the plan (#3 or #4) according to these standards: - achieving the stated organized collection goals of the city, - minimizing displacement of collectors, - ensuring participation of all interested parties in the decision making process, and - maximizing efficiency in solid waste collection. EDINA GARBAGE SERVICES Currently, there are four garbage haulers serving Edina residents: Admiral Waste Management, Quality Waste Control, Vierkant Disposal and Woodlake Sanitary Service (BFI). These haulers all offer volume -based garbage fees for their customers. The increase in garbage rates in the past few years, reflects the tip fee increase from $25 a ton to $95 a ton. Rates remained quite stable for the past several months. Yard waste fees varied a great deal in 1990, often tied to the level of service. Full service customers usually paid less for yard waste pickup than customers on a one -can or two -can garbage rate. A rate of $1 per bag was common for low volume customers. Major appliance disposal is now governed by state law which requires recycling of appliances and special handling of PCB's, mercury switches and CFCs. Garbage haulers will usually make the arrangements for a customer, or residents can deal directly with an appliance recycler for pickup or delivery. A charge of $20 to $25 is common for pickup service. 3 GARBAGE RATE COMPARISON - -OPEN HAULING SYSTEMS The chart below compares the range of Edina rates and services with four other Hennepin County cities with open hauling systems. NUMBER OF SINGLE ONE CAN RATE TWO CAN RATE ' THREE OR NNE CITY SYSTEM HAULERS RATE LOW -HIGH LOW -HIGH LOW -HIGH EDINA Open 4 516.00418.25 519.00420.75 $23.75 - 525.25 BLOOMINGTON District 6 $21 514.50- 517.00 517.75419.50 521.75423.75 (one hauler) EDEN PRAIRIE Open 3 514.00417.00 517.00419.50 $21.75 - 522.50 MINNETONKA Open 10 515.00- 518.00 518.00420.00 521.00424.00 RICHFIELD Open 5 S21 514.00417.00 517.00419.50 523.00 - 522.75 (one hauler) The following observations can be made: - Edina's rates are $1.25 to $2 higher per month than the other cities listed. Since the other cities have curbside pickup, this difference is presumed to be for garage service. Otherwise, rates are similar, city to city. - Distracting does not appear to affect garbage rates. -With one exception, all haulers in these cities offer volume based s rates. - Volume based rates offer residents the opportunity to save money on garbage service. For example; the difference between the lowest one -can rate and the highest full service rate in Edina is $9.25 per month. GARBAGE RATE COMPARISON -- ORGANIZED HAULING SYSTEMS 30 GALLON 60 GALLON 90 GALLON YARD WASTE APPLIANCES RECYCLING EXCELSIOR $15.16 $17.90 +$1.10 per bag Extra chg Separate contract, 51.80 /hh HOPKINS 519.04 No extra chg Extra chg Separate contract, 52.30 /hh (City Crew) ROBBINSDALE $12 Recycler $14 Recy $16.50 +$1 per bag Extra chg Cost included in $14.Non-recy S18 Non -rec 520.501 contract. ST.LOUIS PK 516.74 Recy No extra chg No extra chg Additional 52.02 /hh /mo, 519.07 Non -Recy Same contract. Comments on this chart: -The rates are for curb or alley pickup. -At all levels of service, the organized garbage.rates are somewhat lower than open hauling rates in the cities surveyed. Many factors such as smaller lot size and efficiency of alley pickup may account for the lower rates. The cities which more closely resemble Edina have open hauling systems, making comparison difficult. 4 -Yard waste pickup is included with the higher, single -rate service, but an add -on with low- volume service. This is similar to the open hauling rate structure. - Garbage and recycling service can be included in the same contract, but not all cities have chosen to do so. - Recycling has been encouraged by lower recycling rates or low- volume rates. FUTURE TRENDS The latest design is a high -tech computerized garbage truck which lifts, records the weight, and empties a standardized garbage can automatically. Garbage bills are then computed on the basis of weight. Farmington, Minnesota plans to install the system this year. (See attachment) Trash now goes in many directions: recycling systems for paper, glass, metals, plastics, appliances,- batteries, motor oil etc. -- compost sites for yard waste -- incineration for most garbage. This trend toward separate handling of waste materials shows no sign of stopping. The trend in rate structure seems to be going toward user - fees,. with separate charges.for garbage, yard waste, recyclables, appliances etc. POLICY CONSIDERATIONS Why should'a city consider organized garbage collection ?. Or a districted system? What are the policy concerns? The following factors are presented for consideration in answering these questions. 1. Cost Savings for Residents From the comparison charts, it appears that rates would be lower with organized collection. The haulers disagree, stating in their responses, that there would not be a savings for residents. (See attachments) In organized systems, cities can set the rate structure, and thereby promote recycling and waste reduction with volume -based fees or other incentives. There are, however, some unknowns. Factors such as lot size and distance from disposal 'sites also enter into the rate setting process. Other costs need to be considered in organized collection. City staffing would need to be increased, perhaps by one full time equivalent position, to deal with the additional utility billing and service problems. Also, we should expect some delinquencies in payment of bills by residents, which would increase costs. 2. Efficiency and Environmental Concerns Organized collection, with one garbage truck serving a neighborhood, is the most efficient system. It follows that there would also be a reduction in wear on streets and in'the amount of truck exhaust. Because of separate pickups for garbage, recycling and yard waste, Edina neighborhoods under the present system may possibly have 10 or more trucks providing trash collection services. With an organized system, three trucks would get the job done in any given neighborhood. 5 3. Esthetics: Neighborhood Appearance With districted or organized systems each neighborhood can be served on one day with pickup of garbage, recycling and yard waste. The benefit'to the neighborhood is a quieter, neater environment for the remainder of the week. 4. Freedom of Choice With an open system, residents can shop around for the hauling service that, best suits their needs. For some, yard waste disposal is very important; for others, a low- volume garbage rate is most important. In the past, Edina residents expressed a strong preference to preserve their choice of garbage haulers. In an organized collection process, residents would have the opportunity to express their wishes on this issue at a public hearing. 5. Illegal Garbage Disposal Edina ordinance #711 requires that garbage be collected weekly by a licensed hauler. Contrary to this ordinance, an unknown number of residents dispose of their garbage by other means. Some examples are: -A resident may collect the trash of an elderly parent and dispose of it at his /her own residence. -Two neighbors may arrange joint garbage service, putting their garbage in a common container and sharing the cost. - Garbage may be taken to a dumpster at the residents' place of business. - Garbage may be dropped in public places, such as the Recycling Center, Public Works Building or City Parks. - Garbage may be allowed to accumulate on the premises. In some cases, the rising cost of garbage collection was the motivating factor. On the other hand, some of these practices occurred when garbage rates were very low. Public dumping of garbage doesn't seem to be as serious a problem for Edina as for many other cities. Gene Bartz, Public-Works Superintendant, has not observed any significant increase in garbage dumping in the past few years. He feels it is a minor problem which they are able to handle. Organized garbage collection would assure that all residents have,garbage service. The expectation would be that practices like those listed above would greatly diminish. One remaining question- -what happens when a bill isn't paid? If garbage service were then discontinued, the problems would return. 7. Response from Edina Garbage Haulers Edina residential haulers were notified of this meeting and asked to complete a questionnaire. Their written responses are attached to this report. In follow -up phone calls, the haulers all expressed their serious concern with organized hauling systems even if they were sure to be included in the contract. They view this. type of system as limiting their opportunities to expand, since the pickup area and number of customers is set for the length of the contract. 6 Likewise, a districting system is seen as interfering with their ability to plan routes for maximum efficiency. One hauler who provides twice a week pickup would not be able to offer this service under a districting system unless an exception were made. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION Many residents feel that their garbage rates are too high. They are putting more into the recycling container, less in the garbage can, and feel they should see.a savings on the garbage bill. This may not be a realistic-expectation, due to the high tip fee for garbage disposal, but it is a very understandable reaction. Perhaps new technology, such as paying for garbage by weight, will bring more fairness into rate structures. Each of the garbage systems has its advantages. There is not a clear -cut easy answer. The questions comes down to: what amount of savings justifies a changeover to a new system? $10 a year? $25 a year? or? And, what would the public prefer? If Council wishes to test public opinion on the issues, a public hearing can be set as the beginning of the organized collection process. This process can be concluded at that point if the weight of opinion so dictates. A districted system could be instituted with or without a public. hearing. Council could direct staff to work with the haulers to develop such a system for Council approval. Lastly, if Council believes that the current system serves the residents well, no action need be taken at this time. i City Council Minutes, September 17, 1990 -- REPORT PRESENTED ON SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND APARTMENT RECYCLING: COUNCIL TO REVIEW MMTI- FAMILY RECYCLING PROGRAM IN ONE YEAR Manager Rosland recalled that at the Council meeting of September 4, several questions were raised regarding options for recycling and garbage collection and the costs of the various systems. Janet Chandler, Recycling Coordinator, presented a report on basic information on solid waste collection systems as well as staff suggestions regarding the apartment recycling program summarized as follows. Solid Waste Components Solid waste now handled separately include garbage, recyclables, compostable yard waste and hazardous waste. Garbage haulers are providing separate pickup for,the first three listed. Collection of hazardous waste requires certain permits, licenses and -insurance provisions and therefore these materials are picked up by specialized haulers or may be taken to drop -off locations. Collection Systems - Organized Collection - City contracts with hauler or group of haulers to provide service for whole city or sections of city. Districting - City designates the pickup day within each district. Haulers may have customers in any or all district but must provide_ service on designated day. Open Hauling -- Haulers can service any area of city, property owners may choose hauler. City Operated - City crews perform the service using city trucks. Service Categories by Property T}2e Residential - Single family homes and others with individual hauling service. Multi - family - Apartments and condominiums, centralized dumpster service. Commercial - All non- residential, dumpster service. Haulers classify multi - family buildings as "commercial" since these buildings have dumpster service for'. garbage. Edina's 13 haulers are licensed to serve all property types; however, only five provide service for residential customers. Comparison of Collection Systems A comparison of collection systems was given as to costs, legal requirements, Hennepin. County policy, City ordinances, environmental considerations and public policy concerns. It was noted that to set up Organized Collection the Minnesota Waste Management Act requires cities to follow a set procedure beginning 180 days before implementation. Although not legally required, it may be advisable to follow a sj.milar procedure to set up a Districting system. Apartment Recycling 1991 Staff has worked with the haulers, apartment owners /managers since April to set up a recycling system per ordinances recently adopted. Haulers and managers are moving ahead to start programs by January 1. There has been general approval on the system, with the only concern being the issue of funding. The suggestion was made that the City could contract for recycling service for apartments as well as single family homes and put this in place by January, 1991. Staff would recommend not to provide this service for .1991 but to move ahead with the program as originally planned. Per Hennepin County policy, the $5 per unit container will be the only funding the county will provide for apartments. If the City were to provide this service it would have to cover the entire cost. This issue could be addressed in the context of a study of solid waste collection options, looking to 1992 for implementation of any changes. -over- City Council Minutes, September' 17; 1990 Apartment Recycling Incentive Proerami Upon Council approval, a program could be set up to provide partial funding for apartment recycling in 1991 as follows: When recycling programs are set up the owners or associations would register their program with the City. The City would verify that the program is up and running and issue a one -time incentive payment. Assuming an average recycling cost of $1 per unit per month, 208 funding- for 1991 would cost about $20,000. A $5 per unit payment would cost about $38,000. Funds could be designated for this program from an anticipated surplus in the 1990 recycling budget. A surplus of approximately $50,000 is expected since Hennepin County has agreed to fund 808 of the total $2.45 per household recycling cost for garage service rather than 808 of the curbside cost. Options for Council Consideration - 1) Set a public hearing date to start the process for Organized Collection. 2) Direct staff to prepare a Districting plan and determine if there are any legal requirements that must be met. 3) Study the issues further and bring back additional information in 1991. 4), Take no action at this time. Recycling Alteinatives for Council Consideration 1) Approve continuation of present system with a City contract for all residential buildings of eight units or less for 1991. 2) Provide a start -up incentive for apartment /condominium recycling in buildings of more than eight units to be funded by the anticipated $50,000 surplus in the current recycling budget. 3) Direct staff to include multi - family buildings with more than eight units in the City recycling contract for 1991, or study the issue further. Staff Recommendations 1) To studv'further options for solid waste collection systems, including apartment recycling and funding issues. 2) Proceed with apartment recycling plans as directed in ordinances for 1991. 3) Provide a start -up incentive payment for apartments and condominiums. (Mayor Richards entered the meeting.at 8:15 p.m. during the presentation.) The Council discussed the issue of the apartment recycling incentive program and generally felt that some type of incentive program should be considered. However, it was the consensus that further study and analysis should be conducted during 1991 -to better determine costs to the multi - family buildings before taking any action. Member Paulus made a motion that the Council review in one year the multi- family recycling program. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Richards, Smith Motion carried. It was' the consensus of the Council that staff should bring back early in 1991 further data on the options for solid waste collection systems. No other formal action was taken. rebr_iary :'_. x-141 t.rleroyee 7a-aii Edina. AN C Lt'r ov..n-: LL 4801 w. 30th .1t_ £aina, nK �5 34'x:4 Dear 17-ouncil I a?n vritina to addy-ess the problem of the -counting refuse pzc:•!'u❑ etas-._. in £dsna va-th hopes that the suroject. wiii be discussed at your• - leet.inq. - Along vita nany r't.her• Edina residents, we are a two- neoole houserola. Av nustland' = job takes him out. -of -town aimost every week: the_refOy —e. _l:zr garbage is very minimal. usually about. *_va filled gr•c+cery sags per week. We are on a limited one -can service and. _irece again, last week we receives notice of ;yet- another price increase. i he hauler cited the increased charges due to "_rising costs in fuel, oil. egxtzprfenol parts and postage.' This now brings our cost of dispoEai to somewhat aver scar each filled grocery bag. In aacition. last. Eaiv?er 1 has to sheil out another -:;25.00 to have a gas grill hauled away. As a DO -Year resident = ►f Edina. I wholeheartedly support the recycling effort and par-t.ic.ipate to the fullest, including composting grass c.lippinnE and leaves. And how about the 2 to - Dags of paper, rant. Plastic and glass that 1 recvcle every veem which the nauxer no longer picks up`! It seen+s to me that -- come•tning is wrong here. The trash hauler get-= a wnoie lot more for doing a whole lot less! What is the solution? Perhaps the City of Edina should loox at the system used in St. Louis Park wherein one trasn hauler services a section of the city. The fee (which includes Pickup of appliances, mattresses, ete.) goes on the water bill. This: is certainly more efficient than the present method and the haulers would cut down on their "rising_ costs in fuel. oil, etc.,' Thank You. Sincerely, l Lou Gross 941 -7622 .. per S..- - '''+ ..£,wage %.P. October 1, 1-990 Ron Dror 6227 Westridse Blvd. Edina, MN t-:`436 Fred Richards, Mayor Edina City Hall 4301 W. 50th S reet _dina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Richards, When my family moved to Edina three years ago, was struck by the inefficiency or the garbage collection'system. - having lived previously in Salt Lake City, Utah, and Madison, Wisconsin, i was accustomed to having garbage collected by the city or by.a company which had contracted with the city. I realize that the current system in Edina encourages residents to decrease the amount of garbage they produce by forcing them to pay for collection out of`-their own pockets instead of through taxes. At the same time, however, the system wastes huge amounts of energy, labor, and money. In Salt Lake City and Madison, one garbage truck would pass by my home each week. It would collect garbage from every house in the area.: In Edina, on the other hand, each household is free to contract with a different garbage service. 'thus, many garbage trucks, one from each company, _pass near my house every week. Although each stops at Different homes, they all must cover the entire route. his represents a large waste of gasoline, t -ime, and labor to the garbage services. The cost is passed on to the residents of Edina. If the city as a whole were to contract with any one service, this needless waste would not occur. The price of garbage collection would be reduced, and so would the impact of gasoline waste on the environment. n order to discourage garbage production by residents, the city of Edina could collect fees in proportion to the amount of garbage it collected. In such a system, garbage coilection would be cneaper.and the impact on the �rnvironment far less. /Sincerely, -Ron Dror FEB 25 '91 03 :25PM P.2 /6 WOODLAKE SANITARY SERVICE, INC. A Subsidiary of Waste Systems' EDINA REFUSE HAULER QUESTIONNAIRE If household solid waste collection were organized in Edina, do you believe that there would be a reduction in cost of the service to the resident? RESPONSE: Organized collection as discussed in this region includes two different forms' of hauling systems. One being a bid scenario, where the City sends out a bid document and selects onli►._one hauler for their community. The second is organized collection by consortium. This consortium includes all of the, current haulers in the community who join together and negotiate a contract with the City working as a single entity. The consortium then assigns routes according to the household count each hauler held prior to the implementation of organized collection. On the. surface organized collection may appear in some cases to be less expensive than the open hauling system. However, in our region there are clear examples that organized collection is more expensive (i.e. Champlin, etc.) . Not only is the cost at least the same if not higher,;no community includes their administrative costs as part of the overall expense of either system. In comparing costs, other issues that impact price need review_ as well. Issues such, as distance to disposal sites, service levels, and average lot size of the community served. When all these issues are taken into consideration organized collection is not less expensive than open collection. However, on.the surface these issues are not easily analyzed. If so, how much would the cost reduction be per month for a home with full service? RESPONSE: (NONE) What do you believe would be the advantage of organized household refuse collection? RESPONSE: (NONE) What would be the disadvantage of organized household refuse collection? 9813 Flying Cloud Drive / Eden Prairie. Minnesota 55347 1 (612) 941.5171 PAW" ,,,,wM pap* �' FEB 25 '91 03 :26PM P.3i6 Response from Woodlake Sanitary Service, Cont'tnued Concerns of the General Public Organized collection takes away the consumers freedom to choose who picks up his /her trash and at what level of service that pick up can be offered. Edina, as an affluent suburb, has a relatively high percentage of "back door" service. A reduction in'this rate of service will be an unpopular proposal to many residents. Other concerns of the general public would be the mandatory' service required under. an organized system. The choice of those independent home owners who choose to take their trash to the landfill /transfer station themselves is taken away. Since, under organized collection, each refuse company would be granted a separate district in which only that company can provide service, what alternative would the resident have if the refuse removal service proved unacceptable? The refuse hauler no longer has an incentive to provide good service to his customers, he now operates.in a closed market. Concerns of Private Haulers As mentioned earlier, organized collection destroys the incentive of the private refuse hauler to provide his customers with good service. The incentive to provide good service is competition. Organized collection is an anti - competitive system which denies private industry any opportunity to expand its service area or capitalize'on its ability to meet the different needs of the public. Many residential refuse haulers rely on their "personal touch" service to retain and expand their customer base. Organized collection. negates any advantages a private refuse hauler might have in offering a different type of service. Private haulers face many service Every refuse hauler has different Organized collection does not take refuse collection business: 1.) Volume inequities under an organized system. costs and procedures of operation. into account some key elements of the 2.) Unequal distance to landfill /transfer station 3.) Differences in growth potential If all the rates are the same, how does a hauler get compensated for a greater distance to the landfill /transfer station? If one side of the city is fully developed and the other side a new and growing development, who gets this new expansion? These concerns are answered by private industry, not organized collection. Concerns -of Municipalities The "active supervision" required by law of an organized collection system would be a major, undertaking for the City of Edina. With the expense of staff to administer the program, monitor service complaints, realign boundaries, the expense of "no payments" or "late payments ", etc., the City FEB 25 '91 03 :26PM P.4i6 Response from Woodlake Sanitary Service, Continued will unknowingly enter the refuse collection business in a very big way. Safety and third party liabilities are also a concern to municipalities. Since the City would- be under contract to the Organized 'Collection Corporation, the City would have the ultimate responsibility for the trash under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (Superfund). The City must also be concerned with the insurance coverage levels of all of the refuse haulers. By contracting with the Organized Collection Corporation, the City can now be named as a third party in any resulting lawsuit. This third party liability would also include any Workers' Compensation action. Organized collection exposes the City of Edina to area of liability and expense that are now handled and absorbed by private industry. The actions necessary for installing an organized system, districting (lack of choice), mandatory service, limited service and potential bad service open City Officials to large areas of potential public outcry. Recycling, which is the- main goal of Edina, is not dependent on organized collection. A private industry effort, like the one currently in place, can and will solve the needs of Edina as mandated by the Metropolitan Council. Other Comments: RESPONSE: See attached materials. Illegal dumping is often an issue discussed in conjunction with organized collection. Communities believe that organized collection eliminates illegal dumping and "garbage houses" because garbage is collected at every household. This appears to be logic however, all communities report increases with illegal dumping whether in the open system or the organized collection system. The so called garbage houses are a matter 'of mental health and not a collection process. Illegal dumping is still taking place (i.e. Minneapolis) to help a household decrease their volume rate. Further, illegal dumping takes place because of irresponsible, anti - social behavior and illegal dumping is not a sole problem of the open hauling system. Return to: David A. Velde Company Name: Woodlake Sanitary Service, Inc. City of Edina 4801 West 50th St. Telephone #: (612) -941 -5174 Edina, MN 55424 �+ Your Name: / Kevin Tritz 1'.11w FEB 25 '91 03:27PM H I'LL NG- ,J1`4 -4e,4 P.5 /6 I'e�.11.yl 11�1J !'.t15 Response from Woodlake Sanitary, Continued Ndft M%mv ro/s -C tite I lews .. . i. Sthr Tribune Tuesday October 23 /1990 Read then recycle 1 B w. + f i ... M%W •lit "$y Sicre Brandt -S(all'Writer When Independence Mayor Marvin = Johnsu,I isn't fighting a proposal to :put a landfill in his westem Hennc- Tin .County community, he farms. plc's righting garbage along his fens 'lines as well. Sometimes it's tires. -Other times it's brush. "Last year we had practically a whole living room set sitting in a turner of our cornrtcid," Johnson said. .`Across the Twin Cities metiopoliun at•ea, mono people like Johnson arc being victimized • by illegal trash dumping. Rising disposal fees are protnptinq more people to try to .make their garbage someone else's tProblerti. They risk fines of up to 750 • by stashing trash in ditches, • ysiness trash bins or even ,other L-0 -mle's cans. ,.. Zhe victims are righting back. Some .businesses are padlocking their bins and others search -bags of unwanted trash for envelopes or other evidence Of where the refuse originated. egal.dumping on rise .s, hauling fees increase Minneapolis .ofttclals began offering $50 rewards last year to citizens whose rcVoris at illegal dumping ft. Suit In successful prosecutions. The rise in illegal trash dumping has resulted in a staff proposal to the Metropolitan Council that all house- holds. business or institutions that Produce trash be required to main- tain a contract with a hauler. There always has been some illegal dumping along railroads, in vacant lots and in ditches. But rising costs mean a marked increase in the prob• lem, in Carver County, according to Mike Lien. the county's envirunmcn- tal manager: ` Ditches in less populous areas on the fringe of the region regularly are lit- tered .with items that are banned. front trash cans or are hauled away tor''an extra charge. These include tires, appliances, furniture, yard waste and even demolition waste. Waste specialists describe two types of culprits. One is a homeowner who ' is simply too cheap to pay ristho i hauler charges. The other is an unli. tensed hauler. According to Metro- politan Council estimates, the cost of residential garbage service has risen `• between. 40 and 100 percent in urban areas iri the past two years, prompt- ing some Customers to cancel trash pickup. The increase was estimated at 25 percent for rural residents of the region. When haulers or businesses do find Trash continued on page 713 FEB 25 '91 03 :27PM P.6i6 1:.11`1 t_FlkL�UH ILL NU.JrCJ -4itr4 I•t:U.419`11 ll -.44 1-.UU Response from Woodlake Sanitary, Continued Glenn Kiecker, who supervises pollution control for Minneapolis, Investigated an Illegal dump site In the city Monday. He found papers with addresses at the site that may assist in tracking down the sources of the trash. Trash Continued from page 1D . people not clever cnoufh to remove identification from their trash, they IIcanepin County charges haulers sgs a ton to dispose of trash, a fce in taarvice County. i submit a bill and threaten to turn the "It that finances multiple waste disposal Glcan Kieeker, who supervises pollu- "latter over to police. works 100 perecut of the tune," said Sandy programs. In Ramsey County, where tltc fee increased recently from about tion control for Minneapolis, said unlicensed Itnulers cruise alleys to Roskowiak, one of the owners of Randy's Sanitation. S50 to almost $67 per ton, Herinann finds less illegal dumping. solicit garbage from people who have just cleaned their garages or, base - One commercial hauler says y prob- Aennepitt's trash fees have spillover merits. They charge a -high ice and dump the trash without paying for i Icros with illcgal dumping are the• effects on some neighboring counties, disposal. worst in the western metropolitan "That's going to be the headache of area. "Certainly Hennepin County by far has the worst problem,,' said Tint the next few years. ICs pretty easy to drive down the road and damp a "They ran make an awful lot of "ton- i cy on this," Kiecker said. Hermann, a vice president of Angard refrigerator ofl'the back of a truck or I:nvironmcntat Services. . a couple bags of garbage," said Lien I I. A Response from Vierkant Disposal EDINA REFUSE HAULER QUESTIONNARIE If household solid waste collection were organized in Edina, do you believe that there would be a reduction in cost of the service to the resident? �JJ� A(/P/ If so, how much would the cost reduction'be per month for a home with full service? What do you believe would be the advantage of organized household refuse collection? What would be the disadvantage of organized household refuse collection? Other Comments: / Return to: David A. Velde Company Name: City of Edina 4801 West 50th St. Telephone #: ' as - A S-0 Edina, MN 55424 Your Name: MAM MORSOFSMAFF PHOTOGRAPHER A high -tech garbage truck, using Its robot -like mechanical arm, weighs a can of garbage before empty - Ing It to haul the trash away- FARIIIIIIIOTOM High -tech garbage hauling device figures. what you owe RICHARD CNN sTAFF wwrErt Garbage hauling is going high -tech in Farmington. The city is planning an innovative program to use automated and computerized garbage trucks that can measure and record the weight of every garbage can. That way, Farmington residents will be charged ac- cording to the weight of what they throw away. City officials hope it will be a more precise and fair way of billing. High rollers who throw out more trash and take up more space in garbage trucks and land- fills will have to pay more. Frugal folks who aren't so wasteful will pay less. The new equipment also means haulers will no long- er need to wrestle garbage cans around, instead they'll have to punch a keyboard and use a bar code scanner. The city plans to install and test the equipment this year and start weight -based billing in 1992. Garbage officials believe it may be the first weight -based city- wide system in the nation. The total cost to implement the project will be $154,166, but the city is applying for a $68,163 grant from the Metropolitan Council to .help pay for the equipment. The program is expected to encourage residents to trim the weight of their trash cans through increased recycling. The city hopes for a 5 percent to 10 percent reduction in garbage collections. If that happens, not only will recycling residents see a decrease in their bills, but the cost for the entire city garbage system also should drop because the city will have to pay less for disposal at a landfill or garbage processing center. Robert Williamson, Farmington solid waste coordi- nator, said the proposal has attracted interest from public officials from around the country. other haulers have offered volume -based billing, but the difference is that those systems mean keeping track of different -sized garbage cans, he said. The city of nearly 6,000 people is used to being on the cutting edge of garbage management, ply be- cause it has more control of how it deals with its waste than most other cities in the metro area. It is the only Dakota County city that owns and op- erates its own garbage hauling program to pick up waste for all residents and businesses. Most other cit- ies have left garbage hauling to the private sector. In those towns. residents and companies hire whatever private hauler they choose. With control over its own garbage program, Farm- ington offers its residents an opportunity to recycle more different kinds of materials than any other city in the county. Residents have curbside pickup of office paper, corrugated cardboard, batteries and plastics, in addition to the traditional recyclables: newspapers, cans and glass. Williamson said the city recycles about 29 percent to 30 percent of its residential and commercial gar - bage, including yard waste. Farmington also is proposing to build a garbage compost and recycling project, which would make it the only city in Dakota County that would not have to send waste to the county's proposed garbage mmnera- tor project. County recycling specialist Mike Trdan said Farm - ington's recycling rate is one of the best in the county and the best documented. "They know what they're doing right to the pound," he said. "I think for a small town, they have accom- plished an awful lot." To set up the weight -based garbage collection sys- tem, the city plans to operate two special garbage trucks with hydraulic arms that hoist garbage cans over the side of the truck instead of the back end. Traditional back - loading trucks require at least two workers to operate, but the side - loading tracks only need one worker. In the new trucks, the operator drives up to a can at the curb and stays in the cab while he controls the hydraulic arm that reaches out from the side of the truck and snatches up the can with what looks like a mighty mechanical lobster claw. Before the garbage is dumped in the truck, a sensor in the hydraulic arm measures how much the can weighs, and that information is entered into a portable computer in the cab. The operator also uses a bar code sensor to record the address of the customer. Other information also can be coded into the computer, such as the license plate number of a vehicle blocking ac- cess to the garbage can. Back at city offices, the computer will add up the weight of each customer's garbage and calculate the bill every quarter. Williamson said residents will be charged a flat service fee, plus a fee for every 10 pounds of garbage thrown away. Currently, the city charges each resident $42.50 per quarter for picking up a 90 -gallon container of gar- bage per week, whether the can is half -full or over - flowing. To get the stew system rolling, Farmington needs to buy another garbage truck, computer equipment and software, weight sensors, garbage cans and address decals for the cans. S1 l&I..I P,oxear �1a �aol�f, .t , l 44 l Fra4; } PA of lees To: Ken Rosl and REPORT /RECOMMENDATION From: Janet Chandler Date: March 4, 1991 Subject: Yard Waste Rebate Application Recommendation: Agenda Item # v 1. D. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 7 To Council Action ❑ Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Resolution to authorize submittal of 1991 Hennepin County Yard Waste Rebate application. Info/Background- The Hennepin County Board has authorized extension of the Yard Waste Rebate to Cities through 1991. The amount of the rebate will be approximately the same as that received in 1990, which, for Edina was $71,163. Application must be made now in order to qualify for funding. The staff proposal is to distribute the rebate in the same manner as last year (shown below). Property owners would each receive a credit of approximately $5 on the utility bill during the September- October - November billing cycle. The actual amount might be slightly higher because administrative costs are expected to be lower. 13,987 accounts @ $5 $69,935 Administrative costs 1,228 Total fund $71,163 Residents would be informed through a message printed on the bill and an article in the "About Town" newsletter. -over- YARD WASTE REBATE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the 1991 Hennepin County yard waste program consists of providing rebates to municipalities for the local management of yard waste; and WHEREAS, Edina has established a method of requiring private haulers to take yard waste to County approved compost sites; and WHEREAS, Edina has also established a method of passing on a rebate to the residents of the City through a credit on the utility bill; and WHEREAS, this program meets the requirements of Hennepin County Resolutions #90- 5 -373R2 and #90 -9 -819; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council authorizes submittal of the Hennepin County Yard Waste Rebate Application to continue this program through 1991. YARD WASTE REBATE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the 1991 Hennepin County yard waste program consists of providing rebates to municipalities for the local management of yard waste; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina has established a method of requiring private haulers to take yard waste to County approved compost sites; and WHEREAS, Edina has also established a method of passing on a rebate to the residents of the City through a credit on�the utility bill; and WHEREAS, this program meets the requirements of Hennepin County Resolutions #90- 5 -373R2 and #90 -9 -819; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council authorizes submittal of the Hennepin County Yard Waste Rebate Application to continue this program through 1991. ADOPTED this 4th day of March, 1991. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 4, 1991, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 5th day of March, 19911. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk Agenda Item VI.E M E M O R A N D U M TO: Fred Richards FROM: Susan Wohlrabe SUBJECT: HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION MATTERS DATE: February 22, 1991 I have just received the attached confirmation from the School District regarding the reappointment of Noah Hurley and Betsy Flaten to the Human Relations Commission for another three -year term. I believe this should be on the March 4th Council agenda. The other attachment has been reviewed by Noah Hurley and referred to me for your information. Apparently, David Hallett has experienced unavoidable excuses for three consecutive absences at the Commission meetings. He has a genuine interest in serving on the Human Relations Commission, and his fellow Commissioners think highly of him as he was just elected Vice Chair. It is David's hope, as well as Noah's, that he can continue serving on the Commission. For your information, his last absence was due to my changing the Commission meeting from its regular Tuesday night to Thursday due to the Council Meeting on February 19th. sw Attachment LAURESS V.ACKMAN GERALD E.MAGNUSON EDWARD M.GLENNON MELVIN I.ORENSTEIN ROBERT J. SHERAN ISRAEL E. KRAWETZ EUGENE KEATING JAMES P. MARTINEAU RICHARD J. FITZGERALD JOHN A. FORREST WILLIAM E. FOX JOHN J. CONNELLY JERROLD F. BERGFALK DAVID M. LEBEDOFF JOHN H.STROTHMAN DAVID G. NEWHALL KURTIS A. GREENLEY ROBERT V. ATMORE PATRICK DELANEY RONALD G.VANTINE JOHN B. WINSTON LAURANCE R. WALDOCH THOMAS H. GARRETT III DARYLE L. UPHOFF DAVI D J.D AVENPO RT MARK R. JOHNSON R! WALTER BACH .IAN L 1 N D Q U i S T& VENN U M DAVID AJALLGEYER THOMAS L. FASEL TERRENCE J. FLEMING JEFFREY R. SCHMIDT 4200 IDS CENTER ROLF ENGH -1MOTMY M. BUTLER MINNEAPOLIS MINNESOTA 55402 -2205 RICHARD T. OSTLUNO ROBERT G. MIT CMELL.JR. J. MICHAEL DADY . TELEPHONE 16121 371 -3211 DEBORAH M. REGAN MARTIN R. ROSENBAUM J. KEVIN COSTLEY ELINOR C. ROSENSTEIN ROBERT J. HARTMAN ROSAN14E H. WIRTH JOSEPH G. KOHLER FAX: 16121 371 -3207 DEBRA K. PAGE RICHARD D. MCNEIL CABLE: LINLAW MINNEAPOLIS MICHAEL D. 0LAFSON DONALD C. SWENSON JOEL H. GREEN BRUCE A. BONJOUR WAYZATA OFFICE DAVID L. HALLETT JAMES P. MCCARTHY 740 EAST LAKE STREET CHARLES R.WEAVER. JR. STEVEN J. JOHNSON _ 55391 DAVID L. SASSEVILLE RICHARD IHRIG WAYZATA. MINNESOTA DAVID A. DONNA CAROL T. RIEGER JONATHAN M.BYE RODERICK 1. MACKENZIE MARY P. MCCONNELL WILLIAM E. FLYNN SALLY S. GROSSMAN JAMES W. REUTER WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER TIMOTHY R. BA ER MICHAEL S. MARGULIES TIMOTHY S. MCINTEE THOMAS G. LOVETT IV JOSEPH A. THOMSON THOMAS E.GLENNON ANN L. IIJIMA JOHN R. HOUSTON ELIZABETH G. ABY DEN NJ M. O'M ALLEY SALLY J. WHITESIDE EDWARD J. WEGESON KATHARINE N. HELMS 371 -3210 February 19, 1991 Noah Hurley, Chair Edina Human Relations Commission C/o Susan Wohlrabe 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Anticipated Absence from February 21, 1991 Meeting of the Human Relations commission Dear Noah: a - WALLACE G. HILKE CHARLES P. MOORSE PAT JO POFAHL LUKE H. TER MAAR KAREN L. SCHREIBER CHARLES J. LLOYD JAMES A. LODOEN SUSAN R. MONKMEYER JON G. TRANGSRUD TIMOTHY Y. WONG RANDY G. GULLICKSON SARAH DUFF HALVORSON SANDRA KIM WILLIAM R. MIKOS ROBERT E.TUNHEIM ANSIS V. VIKSNINS LAURA L. DALY OF COUNSEL LEONARD E. LINDOUIST NORMAN L. NEWHALL RETIRED THOMAS VENNUM As we discussed during our,telephone conversation on February 18, 1991, due to a scheduling conflict created by my obligation to attend the Annual Meeting of one•of our clients, I will be unable to attend this week's meeting of the Edina Human Relations Commission. I agreed to be present at the Annual Meeting prior to receiving notice of the rescheduling of this week's Commission meeting. Unfortunately, by the time I received notice of the Commission meeting, it was impossible for me to make other arrangements with our client. As I have told you in the past, I fully support the work of the Commission and continue to be committed to active membership on the Commission and attendance at its meetings. If.yeu need further information, please let me know. Thanks, Noah. Very truly yours, David L. Hallett DLH:jah ACTION 408 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 273 Regular Meeting, February 11, 1991 Volume 62, Report 265 SUBJECT: REAPPOINTMENT TO EDINA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION Be it Resolved, That The Board of Education Reappoint Betsy Flaten to the Edina Human Relations Commission effective February 1, 1991, for a three -year term to expire January 31, 1994. BACKGROUND Betsy Flaten is one of six appointees made to the Human Relations Commission by the School Board and has indicated a willingness to serve another term. Mrs. Flaten was originally appointed to complete the unexpired term of Nancy Maley from 12/21/87 to 1/31/88, with a subsequent reappointment 2/1/88. This would now be the second three - year term for Mrs..Flaten. Current Commissioners Term expires Betsy Flaten 1/31/91 Noah Hurley 1/31/91 Phyllis Kohler 1/31/92 Nancy Atchison 1/31/92 David Hallett. 1/31/93 Sharon Ming 1/31/93 Edina School District Policy 18140 r 409 ACTION SUBJECT: INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 273 Regular Meeting, February 11, 1991 . Volume 62, Report 266 REAPPOINTMENT TO EDINA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION Be it Resolved, That The Board of Education Reappoint Noah Hurley to the Edina Human Relations Commission effective February 1, 1991, for a three -year term to'expire January 31, 1994. BACKGROUND Noah'Hurley is one of six appointees,made to the Human Relations Commission by the School Board_ and has indicated a willingness to serve another term. Mr. Hurley was originally appointed to complete the unexpired term of Lynn Westphal from 7/11/88 to 1/31/91. This would now be the second three -year term for Mr. Hurley. Current Commissioners Term expires Noah Hurley 1/31/91 Betsy Flaten 1/31/91 Phyllis Kohler 1/31/92 Nancy Atchison 1/31/92 David Hallett 1/31/93 Sharon Ming 1/31/93 O Edina School-District Policy #8140 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -04 -91 PAGE 1 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV..# P.O: # MESSAGE- 063700 02/22/91 77.50 MN AUTO DAMAGE DAMAGE APPRAISAL 10- 4504 - 560 -56 50464 3150 77.50 063701 02/22/91 40.94- IND FLOOR MAINT BROOMS 10- 4534 - 310 -30 6073 3050 063701 02/22/91 409.40 IND FLOOR MAINT BROOMS 10- 4534 - 310 -30 6073 3050 063701 02/22/91 40.94 IND FLOOR MAINT BROOMS 10- 4534- 310 -30 6073 3050 409.40 063702 02/22/91 10.00 MOTOR SERVICE SHIPPING CHARGES 10- 4204 - 280 -28 3283 10.00 B6 063703 M - W46S UND 06iiBO 9899 02/22/91 210.00 210.00* TOM WASSMUND UNEF6RM6 SNOW PLOWING 98 42.62 50- 4248 - 841 -84 1002 063704 02/22/91 99.95 WIDE WORLD OF GOLF GOLF VIDEOS 27- 2237 - 000 -00 99.95 063705 02/22/91 22.00 US WEST CELLULAR GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 781 -78 960311 22.00 Q6,IX 02/22/91 75.50 Todd Uniform Inc Uniforms 30- 4262- 782 -78 75.50* * *it-CKS 063707 02/22/91 599.00 GRINNELL CORP GATEVALVE 40- 4540 - 805 -80 F13168 2976 599.00 063708 02/22/91 60.00 METRO CHIEF FIRE DUES 10- 4204- 440 -44 is 60.00 * 063709 02/22/91 105.00 FMAM DUES 10- 4204 - 440 -44 105.00 * 063710 02/22/91 56.76 VALLEY VIEW ASSO REPAIR PARTS 30- 4540 - 782 -78 6799 3280 56.76 063711 02/22/91 265.00 HAGEN COMPANIES GEN SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 13464 3281 265.00 * 063712 02/22/91 35.00 METRO LEGAL SERVICES TITLE SEARCH 11- 4201 - 127 -12 35.00 * 063713 02/22/91 129.00 ABM EQUIP /SUPPLY OUTSIDE REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 9944 3102 129.00 063714 02/22/91 205.76 HANCE COMPANIES BATTERY 10 -4540- 560 -56 6892 2591 063714 02/22/91 55.70 HANCE COMPANIES BATTERY 10- 4540 - 560 -56 6261 2419 261.46 063715 02/22/91 159.00 MARCH DIST INC REPAIR MANUAL 10- 4504 - 560 -56 2962 159.00 063716 02/22/91 236.50 WHEELERS HARDWARE DOOR 10- 4540 - 390 -30 7415 2782 236.50 063717 02/22/91 351.04 JAMES ROBINSON LODGING /MEALS 10- 4206 - 440 -44 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -04 -91 PAGE 2 CHECK NO. DATE. AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. #.MESSAGE < 063717 02/22/91 110.00 JAMES ROBINSON MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 440 -44 461.04 063718 02/22/91 28.79 APPLIANCE PARTS INC HUMIDISTAT 10- 4540 - 560 -56 31250 3157 28.79 * 063719 02/22/91 45.00 WINE SPECTATOR MAGAZINES 50- 4632 - 862 -86 266029 45.00 * 063720 02/22/91 382.00 MEL SATTER MISC PARTS 10- 4504 - 560 -56 382.00 063721 02/22/91 60.66 APA BOOKS 10- 4502 - 120 -12 310987 60.66 * 063722 02/22/91 5.00 CITY /W ST PAUL DUES 10- 4204 - 500 -50 5.00 * 063723 02/22/91 888.65 DIESEL INJECTN SPEC INJECTORS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 9650 1402 888.65 063725 02/22/91 327.70 DAYTON STENCIL WORKS SIGNS 27- 4504- 664 -66 191169 3032 327.70 063726 02/22/91 7.35 SUB TAXI CORP TAXI REFUND 10- 3074- 000 -00 063726 02/22/91 735.00 SUB TAXI CORP TAXI REFUND 10- 3074 - 000 -00 063726 02/22/91 7.35- SUB TAXI CORP TAXI REFUND 10- 3074 - 000 -00 735.00 063727 02/22/91 115.20 BENJAMINS REST /BAKE COST OF GOODS SOLD 28- 4624 - 703 -70 115.20 063728 02/22/91 12.14 DORIE BARMAN CULTURAL EXPO 10- 4280 - 504 -50 12.14 063729 02/22/91 1,292.29 SOFTWARE MKG INTERNL SCAN MINUTES 10- 4201 - 140 -14 91057 3197 1,292.29 063730 02/22/91 615.00 LINDA KOZAK SERV 2/27 -3/12 30- 4201 - 781 -78 615.00 063731 02/22/91 333.50 HARRIS MECH CONTRACT REIMBURSEMENT 10- 3110 - 000 -00 333.50 063732 02/22/91 37.50 BARRETT INC SCREEN PRINTING 10- 4201 - 621 -62 3535 37.50 063733 02/25/91 80.00 WARNING LITES OF MN SCHOOL 10- 4202 - 281 -28 80.00 * 063734 02/25/91 117.00 THE WINDOW AC ADVERTISING 23- 4516 - 611 -61 117.00 * 063735 02/25/91 72.00 PATTI JEUB AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 063736 063737 063738 063739 063740 063741 063742 063743 063744 063745 063746 063747 063748 063749 063750 063751 063752 063753 063753 02/25/91 02/25/91 02/25/91 02/25/91 02/25/91 02/25/91 02/25/91 02/25/91 02/25/91 02/25/91 02/25/91 02/25/91 02/25/91 02/25/91 02/25/91 02/25/91 02/25/91 02/25/91 02/25/91 AMOUNT 72.00 312.00 312.00 * 220' ' 00 220.00 * 156.00 156.00 * 103.00 103.00 * 56.00 56.00 * 17.00 17.00 * 57.00 57.00 * 19.00 19.00 * 17.10 17.10 * 30.00 30.00 * 11.00 11.00 * 30.00 . 30.00 * 85.60 85.60 * 50.00 50.00 * 75.00 75.00 *' 70.00 70.00 10.00 10.00 24.90 472.00 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION DANNY MACKERMAN KAREN KNUTSON LOUSIE GILLIS DONNA FAUS COURTNEY COMB EVELYN HUNDT MARILEE WUOLLET LOWELL HUNDT LYDIA PERTINEN WILLIAM CACINETS LEROY LISK COLLEGE OF STATE OF MN MPLS COMMODORES JACKI BETSWORTH DIANE ARENSON DEPT OF LABOR COMM FURNITURE COMM FURNITURE AC INSTRUCTOR AC INSTRUCTOR AC INSTRUCTOR CLASS CANCEL CLASS CANCEL CLASS CANCEL CLASS CANCEL CLASS CANCEL CLASS CANCEL GENERAL SUPPLIES DR LICENSE CONT ED GENERAL SUPPLIES SERV 4/11/91 SERV 4/18/91 REFUND RENEWAL REMODELING REMODELING 03 -04 -91 PAGE 3 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 3500 - 000 -00 23- 3500 - 000 -00 23- 3500 - 000 -00 23- 3500 - 000 -00 23- 3500 - 000 -00 23- 3500 - 000 -00 10- 4504 - 646 -64 10- 4310 - 440 -44 50- 4206 - 860 -86 10- 4504 - 560 -56 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 4224 - 781 -78 30- 3505- 000 -00 30- 4202 - 781 -78 25- 4924- 520 -52 3047 25- 4924 - 520 -52 4391 3404 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -04 -91 PAGE 4 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. #:MESSAGE 063753 02/26/91 1,000.80 COMM FURNITURE REMODELING 25- 4924 - 520 -52 4392 3424 1,497.70 063754 02/25/91 162.00 LITTLE BLIND SPOT BLINDS 10- 4504 - 520 -52 1407 3403 162.00 * 063755 02/25/91 305.30 STREFF INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 100 -10 1296 3402 305.30 * 063756 02/25/91 72.95 ADDON INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 667 -66 30920 3198 72.95 063757 02/25/91 54.00 SANCO INC CLEANING SUPPLIES 27- 4512 - 667 -66 22780 3259 54.00 * 063758 02/25/91 88.51 FOX VALLEY SYSTEM GENERAL SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 667 -66 3417 88.51 * 063759 02/25/91 613.00 VALLEY VIEW ASSO GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 783 -78 6771 2848 613.00 063760 02/26/91 18.00 TIM ZIMMERMAN REIMBURSEMENT 10- 4202 - 600 -60 18.00 * 063761 02/26/91 176.90 CUSTOM RUBBER STAMP OFFICE SUPPLIES 23- 4516- 611 -61 6745 2726 176.90 * 063762 02/26/91 19.30 ACTION MESSENGER SERVICE CONTRACTS 30- 4288 - 781 -78 051873 19.30 063763 02/26/91 140.00 VIKING UPDATE ADVERTISING 27 -4214- 667 -66 2247 140.00 * 063764 02/26/91 60.00 MN URBAN TRAFFIC REGISTRATION 10- 4202 - 281 -28 60.00 063765 02/26/91 40.00 MN CHAPTER IACCI MEMBERSHIP 10- 4204 - 420 -42 40.00 * 063766 02/26/91 42.17 ROGER OLWIN MEETING EXP 10- 4206 - 420 -42 42.17 * 063767 02/26/91 34.95 BOTTOM LINE PERSONAL RENEWAL 10- 4204 - 420 -42 34.95 * 063768 02/26/91 45.40 CRAIG SWANSON MEETING EXP 10- 4206 - 420 -42 45.40 063769 02/26/91 400.00 SCOTT BECHTOLD CONT ED 10- 4202 - 420 -42 400.00 063770 02/26/91 47.77 PRENTICE HALL SUBSCRIPTION 10- 4204 - 420 -42 47.77 063771 02/26/91 56.15 PRECISION GUN SPEC AMMUNITION 10- 4572 - 420 -42 2016 3169 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 063772 063773 063774 063775 063775 063776 063776 063777 063778 063779 063780 063781 063782 063783 063784 063785 063786 063787 063788 063788 02/26/91 02/26/91 02/26/91 02/26/91 02/26/91 02/26/91 02/26/91 02/26/91 02/26/91 02/26/91 02/26/91 02/26/91 02/26/91 02/26%91 02/26/91 02/26/91 02/26/91 02/26/91 02/26/91 02/26/91 AMOUNT 56.15 * 195.00 195.00 * 66.22 66.22 * 387.73 387.73 * 260.00 270.00 530.00 * 226.87 44.88 271.75 * 454.24 454.24 * 60.00 60.00 * 3,114.84 3,114.84 * 4,896.00 4,896.00 * 939.74 939.74 * 218.00 218.00 * 46.90 46.90 * 25.00 25.00 * 133.00 133.00 * 11.00 11.00 * 64.22 64.22 * 176.00 371.50 547.50 * CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION DEPT OF FINANCE A I HALPER BOX CO ACCUFORM GOLF LTD JILL CAMERON JILL CAMERON CRAIG WERNESS CRAIG WERNESS STANDARD FUSEE CORP MACQUEEN EQUIP HENN CTY TREASURER KRUASE ANDERSON CON TCS ENTERPRISE QUANTUM CLEAN SERV WORLD DIST CITY ENGINEERS LINDA DALEN STEPHEN LANDRY ISADORE B LONDON PINK COMPANIES PINK COMPANIES CONT ED AMMUNITION GENERAL SUPPLIES WP 51 CLASS II WP5 1 CLASS I MILEAGE MILEAGE SAFETY EQUIP RESERVATIONS WORKHOUSE /JAIL CONSTRUCTION AMMUNITION CARPET CLEANING TOOLS DUES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT AMBULANCE REFUND GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 03 -04 -91 PAGE 5 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4202 - 420 -42 020808 10- 4572 - 420 -42 17554 27- 4504- 664 -66 5919 3253 10- 4201 - 600 -60 14043 10- 4201 - 600 -60 1042 10- 4208 - 600 -60 10- 4208 - 600 -60 10- 4642 - 420 -42 2940 10- 4202 - 281 -28 10- 4286- 220 -22 000050 60- 1300 - 290 -04 10- 4572- 420 -42 2513 2941 28- 4248 - 702 -70 3565 2714 10- 4580 - 642 -64 3373 10- 4204 - 240 -24 10- 4202 - 160 -16 10- 4310 - 440 -44 10- 3180 - 000 -00 27- 4504- 662 -66 531013 3188 27- 4504 - 662 -66 531014 2831 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 063789 02/26/91 063790 02/26/91 063791 02/26/91 063792 02/26/91 063793 02/26/91 kkkk *k 063A01 02/22/91 kkkkkk * ** -CKS 063A08 02/25/91 k k k k k k 063A19 02/25/91 k k k k k k 063A21 02/22/91 kkkkkk 7130 063A29 02/25/91 k k k k k k 063A34 02/22/91 k k k k k k 063A39 02/22/91 063A39 02/25/91 063A39 02/25/91 063A39 02/22/91 063A39 02/22/91 * *kkk k AMOUNT 7,600.00 7,600.00 * 615.00 615.00 * 117.28 117.28 * 30.00 30.00 * 95.40 95.40 * 169.34 169.34 61.76 61.76 46.07 46.07 195.71 195.71 11.13 11.13 48.50 48.50 204.32 28.90 16.70 64.60 55.00 369.52 I CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION NATL CAR RENTAL CAR HOPKINS FIRE DEPT HAZMAT RESPONSE TEAM MARKETING CO GENERAL SUPPLIES TRI STATE VIDEO SERV REPAIRS BAILEY POTTERY EQ GENERAL SUPPLIES 3M CO LETTERS ABP MIDWEST INC CULTURAL EXPO ADVON UNIFORMS 'ADT SECURITY SYS. ALBINSON ALLIED PLASTICS ALTERNATOR REBUILD ALTERNATOR REBUILD ALTERNATOR REBUILD ALTERNATOR REBUILD ALTERNATOR REBUILD ALARM SERVICE GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES - REPAIR PARTS STARTER REBUILT REPAIR PARTS kk *- CKS° 10- 4280 - 504 -50 533076 3331 k k k-CKS "� 30- 4262 - 782 -78 899061 3350 * ** -CKS 30- 4304 - 782 -78 992394 3336 * ** -CKS 30- 4504 - 782 -78 717822 2457 * ** -CKS 27- 4540 - 666 -66 6561 3248 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 325 -30 7130 3048 10- 4540- 560 -56 13849 3068 10- 4540 - 560 -56 13263 2980 10- 4540 - 560 -56 15276 3217 10- 4540 - 560 -56 13863 3153 * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -04 -91 PAGE 7 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 063A41 02/26/91 93.60 AMBASSADOR FOODS MEAT 27- 4624 - 662 -66 2688 93.60 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 063A45 02/26/91 40.26 AMER. PHOTO COPY GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 F36841 40.26 * * * * ** * *. -CKS 063A48 02/25/91 262.72 ALPHA VIDEO /AUDIO CAMERA REPAIR 10- 4248 - 520 -52 90318 3148 262.72 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 063A53 02/25/91 106.67 AMERICAN SHARECOM TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 106.67 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 063A64 02/25/91 576.00 MARIAN ALSTAD AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201- 611 -61 576.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 063A76 02/22/91 259.40 ASPLUND COFFEE COST OF GOODS SOLD 28- 4248 - 703 -70 15828 3252 259.40 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 063A82 02/26/91 4.06 AT & T TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 063A82 02/26/91 38.26 AT & T TELEPHONE 27- 4256 - 662 -66 063A82 02/26/91 2.96 AT & T TELEPHONE 27- 4256 - 664 -66 063A82 02/26/91 93 AT & T TELEPHONE 40- 4256 - 803 -80 46.21 * 063A83 02/26/91 140.00 AT & T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 628 -62 140.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 063A96 02/22/91 33.50 AUTOMOBILE SERV CTR ALIGNMENT 10- 4248 - 560 -56 5588 3226 33.50 * * * * ** *.* -CKS 063B01 02/25/91 92.50 B & B SEAT COVERS REPLACEMENT PARTS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 11623 2953 92.50 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 063603 02/22/91 75.00 BENSON OPTICAL SAFETY GLASSES 10- 4642 - 301 -30 456790 063603 02/25/91 20.35 BENSON OPTICAL SAFETY GLASSES 10- 4642 - 646 -64 81663 3132 95.35 * 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -04 -91 PAGE 8 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * k k k * k 063B13 02/25/91 819.16 BARR ENGINEERING 063613 02/25/91 601.14 BARR ENGINEERING 34,191.85 PARTS 1,420.30 063B18 02/22/91 377.76 063614 02/22/91 63.60 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 063814 02/22/91 50.67 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 063814 02/22/91 160.86- BOYER TRUCK PARTS 063614 02/22/91 40.03 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 063B14 02/22/91 40.08 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 063B14 02/22/91 160.86 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 063B14 02/22/91 232.51 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 063814 02/22/91 90.38 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 063614 02/22/91 160.83 BOYER TRUCK PARTS BERTELSON BROS. 678.10 GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 k k k k k k 063817 02/25/91 34,009.45 BFI RECYCLING SYS 063817 02/25/91 182.40 BFI RECYCLING SYS 898405 3228 34,191.85 PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 063B18 02/22/91 377.76 BATTERY WAREHOUSE 063818 02/22/91 230.12- BATTERY WAREHOUSE 063618 02/22/91 68.04 BATTERY WAREHOUSE 063818 02/22/91 43.20 BATTERY WAREHOUSE 063818 02/22/91 244.28 BATTERY WAREHOUSE 063818 02/22/91 99.16 BATTERY WAREHOUSE 898577 3165 602.32 063630 * k k * * R ENGINEERING SERVICE ENGINEERING * ** -CKS 27- 1300 - 003 -00 5769 41- 4201 - 900 -90 186 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 898077 3149.. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 898405 3228 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 898577 3165 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 897279 3065 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 898017 3065 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 898577 3165 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 896607 2986 SWITCH 10- 4540 - 560 -56 897203 3060 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 898577 3165 RECYCLING CONTRACT 10- 4226- 507 -50 910100 RECYCLING SERVICE 10- 4226- 507 -50 10347 BATTERY CREDIT BULBS BULBS BULBS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10- 4540- 560 -56 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10- 4540 - 560 -56 27- 4540 - 664 -66 81278 79500 80101 2815 83104 3227 79673 2815 82363 3094 063827 02/26/91 168.53 ' BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 50- 4626- 822 -82 063B27 02/26/91 539.18 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 50- 4626 - 842 -84 063B27 02/26/91 441.53 BERGFORD TRUCKING LIQUOR DELIVERY 50- 4626- 862 -86 1,149.24 kkkkkk 063630 02/26/91 161.00 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 646865 3199 063830 02/26/91 31.39 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 649734 063630 02/26/91 37.02 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 649658 063630 02/22/91 89.12 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 : . 063830 02/25/91 86.40 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 647297 063B30 02/25/91 47.38 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 649736 063630 02/25/91 171.00 BERTELSON BROS. INC. SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 645815 063830 02/25/91 11.96 BERTELSON BROS. INC. SIGN 10 -4504- 520 -52 647472 063830 02/22/91 53.69 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 540 -54 645774 2960 063630 02/22/91 28.40 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 560 -56 647297 063830 02/22/91 9.05 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 440 -44 647297 063B30 02/25/91 31.30 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 12- 4504 - 434 -43 649736 063B30 02/25/91 95.32 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516- 781 -78 648093 3276 853.03 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS *A * -CK5 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -04 -91 PAGE 9 . CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 063B31 02/25/91 336.00 BETSY BRYANT AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 336.00 063632 02/22/91 476.00 BEST LOCK OF MPLS KEY SET 10 -4540- 390 -30 012417 3057 063B32 02/22/91 135.35 BEST LOCK OF MPLS GEN SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 12416 2944 611.35 * * * * ** * * *- CKS 063874 02/25/91 75.00- BRADLEY SENN P7R REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 646 -64 063B74 02/25/91 75.00 BRADLEY BENN P7R REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 646 -64 063B74 02/25/91 75.00 BRADLEY BENN P &R REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 646 -64 75.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 063682 02/25/91 384.31 BRUNSON INSTRUMENT SURVEY EQUIP 10 -4504- 260 -26 082955 2458 063B82 02/25/91 96.72 BRUNSON INSTRUMENT SURVEY EQUIP 10 -4504- 260 -26 082953 2458 481.03 * * * * ** * ** -CK5_. 063C01 02/25/91 216.50 C & S DISTRIBUTING COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624- 613 -61 119667 3179 216.50 * * *w ** *w* -CKS ". 063C05 02/22/91 45.00 CAMPBELL -RALPH BOOKS 10- 4502 - 140 -14 45.00 063C16 02/22/91 160.88 'CATCO REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 365523 3212 160.88 063C17 02/22/91 93.87 CDP RENTAL 10- 4504 - 540 -54 93.87 063C22 02/22/91 36.72 CERT POWER TRAIN REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 73653 3059 36.72 * * * * *w * *r_CK5 063C25 02/26/91 52.05 CHAPIN PUBLISHING ADVERTISING 30- 4214 - 781 -78 3469 52.05 * * * * ** * **- CKS 063C33 02/25/91 182.58 CITY OF EDINA WATER 10- 4258 - 446 -44 063C33 02/25/91 28.64 CITY OF EDINA WATER 10- 4258 - 646 -64 211.22 * * * ** * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -04 -91 PAGE 10 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P..O. #::MESSAGE 063C35 02/22/91 214.40 CITYLINE ADVERTISING 30- 4214 - 781 -78 797 3337 214.40 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 063C60 02/26/91 45.50 CONSTR FASTENING SYS GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 15166 45.50 063C89 02/22/91 53.10 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 47270. 3106 063C89 02/22/91 93.35 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540- 664 -66 47236 3100.. 146.45 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 063C93 02/22/91 3,420.13 CERT HYD SPEC REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560-56 84288 2661 3,420.13 K 063C97 02/22/91 181.43 CYLINDER CITY PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 30123 3133 181.43 * * * * ** * ** -CKS ::. 063D07 02/25/91 83.50 D.C. HEY CO. CONTRACTED REPAIRS 23- 4248 - 612 -61 220529 3265 063D07 02/26/91 29.65 D.C. HEY CO. SERVICE CONTRACT 30- 4288 - 781 -78 3470 113.15 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 063D26 02/25/91 126.00 TOBIE DICKER PT MAINT AC 23- 4120 - 612 -61 063D26 02/25/91 966.00 'TOBIE DICKER AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 1,092.00 * * * * ** *.* -CKS 063D36 02/25/91 502.00 BILL DIETRICHSON AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 502.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 063D52 02/25/91 286.25 DISCOM OF MN INC MAINT. CONTRACTT 10- 4294 - 560 -56 10814 286.25 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 063E14 02/25/91 285.56 EARL F. ANDERSON REFURBISH SIGNS 10- 4542 - 325 -30 103807 2800 063E14 02/26/91 61.34 EARL F. ANDERSON GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 3332 346.90 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 063E20 02/22/91 25.00 ECOLAB PEST ELIM. SERVICE CONTRACTS 30- 4288 - 782 -78 P29485 3338 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 063E20 02/22/91 063E20 02/22/91 k *N * *N 063E51 02/26/91 063E51 02/26/91 k k N k k k 063E60 02/22/91 k k * * k k 063E73 02/26/91 063E75 02/22/91 063E97 02/22/91 * * * * ** 063F11 02/25/91 063F11 02/25/91 063F11 02/25/91 k k k N k* 063F26 02/26/91 N k N k k* 063F73 02/25/91 k* k k k N 063F99 02/25/91 ' 063F99 02/25/91 * *NN *N 063G20 02/26/91 AMOUNT 85.00 25.00- 85.00 * 289.00 237.00 526.00 * 210.24 210.24 * 27.88 27.88 * 300.00 300.00 * 3,975.00 3,975.00 * 255.00 788.00 625.34 1,668.34 * 347.89 347.89 * 396.00 396.00 *' 45.00 24.00 69.00 145.23 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ECOLAB PEST ELIM. SERVICE CONTRACTS ECOLAB PEST ELIM. SERVICE CONTRACTS EGGHEAD DIS SOFTWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES EGGHEAD DIS SOFTWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES ELECTRIC MOTOR REP EMER MED. PRODUCTS EMPLOYEES CLUB E -Z -GO TEXTRON FEED RITE CONTROL FEED RITE CONTROL FEED RITE CONTROL FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL SUSAN FRAME AGNES FINE AGNES FINE GENE SCARS SUPPLY REPAIR AMBULANCE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES RANGER GOLF CAR GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER CHEMICAL REPAIR PARTS AC INSTRUCTOR AC INSTRUCTOR CRAFT SUPPLIES /AC REPAIRS 03 -04 -91 PAGE 11 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. #.MESSAGE 30- 4288 - 782 -78 P29485 3338 30- 4288 - 782 -78 P29485 3338 * ** -CKS 10- 4504- 600 -60 27- 4504- 661 -66 * ** -CKS 28- 4248 - 702 -70 140685 3082 * ** -CKS 10- 4510- 440 -44 083441 2741 * ** -CKS 10- 4504 - 500 -50 * ** -.CKS 27- 1340 - 000 -00 930681 1964 * ** -CKS 40- 4504 - 805 -80 152763 2862 40- 4504 - 805 -80 152761 3237 40- 4622 - 805 -80 152736 7342 * ** -CKS 40- 4540 - 810 -80 4331 2648 * ** -CKS 23- 4201 - 611 -61 * ** -CKS 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4588 - 611 -61 * ** -CKS 29- 4248 - 722 -72 015114 2061 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 145.23 * * * * * ** 063G32 02/22/91 165.00 GOPHER STATE 1 CALL JAN SERVICE 165.00 * * * * * ** 063G44 02/25/91 50.00 GLEN SIPE PIANO SERV SERVICE CONTRACT 50.00 * 063657 02/25/91 242.00 GOPHER OIL CO. REPAIR 063G57 02/25/91 201.53 GOPHER OIL CO. REPAIR 443.53 * * * * * ** 063G68 02/25/91 31.25- GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. CONNECTORS 063068 02/25/91 54.36- GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. TOOLS 063G68 02/25/91 233.91 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. BALLAST 148.30 * * * * * ** 063G70 02/25/91 400.00 MARGARET GUST AC INSTRUCTOR 063G70 02/25/91 39.00 MARGARET GUST CRAFT SUPPLIES /AC 439.00 * 063G88 02/25/91 300.00 'PAT GEISHEKER AC INSTRUCTOR 300.00 * * * * * ** 063G93 02/25/91 540.00 JEAN GRAPP AC INSTRUCTOR 540.00 * * * * * ** 063G95 02/25/91 160.00 KATHY GUSTAFSON AC INSTRUCTOR 160.00 * * * * * ** 063H06 02/25/91 137.00 PHYLLIS HAYWA AC INSTRUCTOR 137.00 * * * * * ** 063H21 02/22/91 172.71 HARMON GLASS WINDSHIELD 172.71 * 03 -04 -91 PAGE 12 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 10- 4318 - 280 -28 191191 3229 30- 4288 - 782 -78 910222 3400 *k*- CKS 28- 4248- 704 -70 422156 3187 28- 4248 - 704 -70 421788 * ** -CKS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 232866 2799 10- 4540- 520 -52 234365 2963 10- 4540 - 646 -64 232254 2802 * "- CKS;, >.::; 23 -4201- 611 -61 23- 4588 - 611 -61 * - CKS `':. 23- 4201 - 611 -61 * ** -CKS 23- 4201 - 611 -61 * ** -CKS 23- 4201 - 611 -61 * ** -CKS 23- 4201 - 611 -61 * ** -CKS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 3155 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 12.72 HENN CTY SHERIFF 063H32 02/25/91 063H33 02/26/91 063H33 02/26/91 063H33 02/26/91 063H34 02/26/91 34.78 HERMAN MILLER INC. 063H42 02/25/91 063H42 02/26/91 063H42 02/25/91 53.66 HIRSHFIELDS 063H56 02/22/91 * * k * * * EVIE HOLMQUIST 063H58 02/25/91 063H58 02/25/91 * k k * * k 'HARRY HEIM 063H70 02/25/91 063I71 02/26/91 * * * * ** * 063I74 02/22/91 * * * * ** * 063J23 02/22/91 *kk * ** * 063J27 02/25/91 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 36.15 HEDGES -DIANA 36.15 * 12.72 HENN CTY SHERIFF 240.97 HENN CTY SHERIFF 231.00 HENN CTY SHERIFF 484.69 * 1,292.10 HENN COUNTY TREAS. 1,292.10 * 34.78 HERMAN MILLER INC. 9.63 HERMAN MILLER INC. 257.61 HERMAN MILLER INC. 302.02 * 53.66 HIRSHFIELDS 53.66 * 405.00 EVIE HOLMQUIST 28.99 EVIE HOLMQUIST 433.99 * 180.00 'HARRY HEIM 180.00 * 224.85 IDELLES INTER DESN 224.85 * 3,116.00 IOS 3,116.00 * 35.50 JR JOHNSON SUP 35.50 * 28.90 JERRYS FOODS 28.90 * AC ADVERTISING EQUIP MAINT WORKHOUSE /JAIL EQUIP CONSTRUTION REMODELING REMODELING REMODELING PAINT SUPPLIES AC INSTRUCTOR CRAFT SUPPLIES AC INSTRUCTOR GENERAL SUPPLIES FAX GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 03 -04 -91 PAGE 13 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 23- 4214 - 611 -61 10- 4274 - 420 -42 10- 4286 - 220 -22 10- 4901 - 420 -42 60- 1300 - 285 -04 * ** -CKS 25- 4924 - 520 -52 570609 2392 25- 4924 - 520 -52 551509 25- 4924 - 520 -52 570608 2442 * * * -CKS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 246270 2988 * ** -CKS '. 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4588 - 611 -61 * ** -CKS 23- 4201 - 611 -61 30- 4504 - 782 -78 249771 3467 -CKS. 10- 4902 - 500 -50 A06230 2856 * ** -CKS 30- 4504 - 782 -78 12442 * ** -CKS 23- 4504 - 611 -61 * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -04 -91 PAGE 14 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. #MESSAGE: :; >::::>r. 063J31 02/22/91 68.36 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 301 -30 063J31 02/22/91 50.33 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 063J31 02/22/91 23.16 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 322 -30 063J31 02/22/91 2.82 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 420 -42 063J31 02/22/91 41.40 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 063J31 02/22/91 85.55 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 440 -44 063J31 02/22/91 7.08 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 480 -48 063J31 02/22/91 17.36 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 482 -48 063J31 02/22/91 9.37 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 507 -50 063J31 02/22/91 16.69 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 520 -52 063J31 02/22/91 24.63 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 540 -54 063J31 02/22/91 112.10 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 560 -56 063J31 02/22/91 195.02 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 063J31 02/22/91 58.79 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 648 -64 063J31 02/22/91 37.82 JERRYS HARDWARE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 063J31 02/22/91 53.95 JERRYS HARDWARE PAINT 10- 4544- 646 -64 063J31 02/22/91 54.51 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 661 -66 063J31 02/22/91 73.30 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 667 -66 063J31 02/22/91 21.16 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 29- 4504 - 722 -72 063J31 02/22/91 127.98 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782-78 063J31 02/22/91 67.04 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504- 801 -80 063J31 02/22/91 72.87 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 063J31 02/22/91 76.99 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 803 -80 063J31 02/22/91 22.57 JERRYS HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 50- 4504 - 841 -84 1,320.85 * ** -CKS 063J35 02/26/91 53.95 JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING 29- 4600 - 721 -72 5673 3419 53.95 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 063J41 02/22/91 406.32 'JIM HATCH SALES FENCE 30- 4504 - 784 -78 12153 2596 406.32 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 063J99 02/26/91 40.00 'JANET CANTON MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 160 -16 40.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 063K05 02/22/91 71.13 K & K SALES REPAIR 28- 4248 - 702 -70 58099 3091 71.13 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 063K09 02/22/91 7.53 KAMAN INDUST TECH REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 3020 063K09 02/22/91 48.98 KAMAN INDUST TECH REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 3020 063K09 02/25/91 124.74 KAMAN INDUST TECH REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 3274 063K09 02/22/91 56.49 KAMAN INDUST TECH REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 698447 3020 063K09 02/25/91 19.16 KAMAN INDUST TECH BEARINGS 50- 4540 - 841 -84 698494 3071 256.90 * 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE * * * * ** 063K35 02/22/91 063K35 02/25/91 063K35 02/22/91 063K35 02/25/91 063K35 02/26/91 063K35 02/25/91 063K35 02/22/91 063K35 02/22/91 063K35 02/26/91 * * * * ** 063K97 02/25/91 * * * * ** 063L01 02/25/91 063L01 02/25/91 * * * * ** 063L28 02/25/91 063L28 02/25/91 063L28 02/22/91 063L28 02/25/91 063L28 02/22/91 063L28 02/25/91 063L28 02/25/91 063L28 02/25/91 ' 063L28 02/25/91 063L28 02/25/91 063L28 02/25/91 063L28 02/22/91 063L28 02/25/91 063L28 02/22/91 063L28 02/25/91 * * * * ** 06306 02/25/91 AMOUNT 88.68 7.34 86.94 28.68 20.80 162.42 163.01 4.18 35.92 597.97 20.00 20.00 615.00 152.48 767.48 148.50 148.50- 306.92 205.39 51.26 312.64 420.02 2.81 329.88 148.50 432.06 216.94 459.73 493.43 460.47 3,840.05 145.00 145.00 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KNOX COMM CREDIT KANDIYOHI /WATER LINDA KOZAK LINDA KOZAK LAWSON PRODUCTS LAWSON PRODUCTS LAWSON PRODUCTS LAWSON PRODUCTS LAWSON PRODUCTS LAWSON PRODUCTS ' LAWSON PRODUCTS ' LAWSON PRODUCTS LAWSON PRODUCTS LAWSON PRODUCTS LAWSON PRODUCTS LAWSON PRODUCTS LAWSON PRODUCTS LAWSON PRODUCTS LAWSON PRODUCTS LEFFLER PRINTING *** * ** 063L46 02/26/91 60.13 LIEN INFECTION CON 60.13 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PLYWOOD HARDWARE AMMUNITION MATERIAL LUMBER LUMBER REPAIRS PRO SERV 03 -04 -91 PAGE 15 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O: # MESSAGE * * * -CKS 10- 4504 - 646 -64 823717 3137 10- 4504 - 646 -64 10- 4540- 540 -54 10- 4540 - 646 -64 10- 4572 - 420 -42 10- 4580 - 301 -30 10- 4604 - 646 -64 10- 4604 - 646 -64 28- 4248 - 702 -70 23- 4201 - 612 -61 SERVICES /EDINBOROUGH 30- 4201- 781 -78 REIMBURSEEMENT 30- 4504 - 783 -78 NUTS /BOLTS NUTS /BOLTS GENERAL SUPPLIES BRUSHES GENERAL SUPPLIES TORQ /ALLOY PINS WHEELS/ SPECIAL REPAIR PARTS NUTS /BOLTS DRILLS GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS HEAT GUN PRINTING SANITATION 801302 3244 823714 3142 720108 3215 807897 720486 2979 808296 3075 792704 3143 801120 3333 10- 4320 - 560 -56 485705 2792 10- 4320 - 560 -56 485705 2792 10- 4504 - 301 -30 2878 10- 4504 - 301 -30 485702 2588 10- 4504 - 322 -30 2875 10- 4504 - 322 -30 485703 2791 10- 4504- 325 -30 485707 2794 10- 4504 - 560 -56 484880 10- 4504 - 646 -64 485706 2793 10- 4620 - 560 -56 485705 2792 10- 4620 - 560 -56 485704 2792 40- 4504 - 801 -80 2877 40 -4540- 801 -80 484879 2789 40- 4540- 803 -80 2876 40- 4580 - 803 -80 486535 2790 30- 4600 - 781 -78 4551 3351 27- 4201 - 663 -66 2698 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 063L48 02/26/91 1,896.00 LIGHTING RESOURCES GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,896.00 * kkkkkk 063L54 02/25/91 268.38 LUNDS SNOW PLOWING 268.38 * kkkkkk 063L56 02/22/91 50.50 LINHOFF ADVERTISING k k k k k k 50.50 063L60 .02/25/91 18.20 LOGIS COMPUTER SERVICES 063L60 02/25/91 5,972.09 LOGIS COMPUTER SERVICES 063L60 02/22/91 3,144.76 LOGIS HOMESTEAD CARDS 063L60 02/25/91 4,889.62 LOGIS COMPUTER SERVICES 063L60 02/25/91 7,282.78 LOGIS COMPUTER SERVICES 063L60 02/25/91 2,967.68 LOGIS COMPUTER SERVICES 063L60 02/25/91 597.85 LOGIS COMPUTER SERVICES 063L60 02/25/91 597.86 LOGIS COMPUTER SERVICES 063L60 02/25/91 597.86 LOGIS COMPUTER SERVICES 26,068.70 063L84 02/25/91 180.00 NICK LEGEROS AC INSTRUCTOR 180.00 * k k k k k k 063L98 02/25/91 . 215.90 'MIDWEST MACHINERY KNIFE 215.90 * k k k k k k 063M12 02/25/91 14.24 MATHISON CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES 14.24 * k k k k k k 063M19 02/22/91 9.66 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 063M19 02/22/91 44.52 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 063M19 02/22/91 3,218.43 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 063M19 02/22/91 152.00 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY TOOLS 063M19 02/22/91 15.12 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY TOOLS 063M19 02/22/91 894.21 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY PARTS 063M19 02/22/91 278.16 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 4,612.10 kkkkkk 063M22 02/22/91 83.21 MCNEILUS STEEL STEEL 03 -04 -91 PAGE 16 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 30- 4504 - 782 -78 2832 50- 4201 - 821 -82 13210 30- 4214 - 781 -78 186242 3340 10- 1145 - 000 -00 019127 10- 4233 - 160 -16 019108 10- 4233 - 200 -20 1950 10- 4233 - 200 -20 019108 10- 4233 - 420 -42 019108 40- 4233 - 800 -80 019108 50- 4233 - 820 -82 019108 50- 4233- 840 -84 50- 4233 - 860 -86 23- 4201 - 611 -61 10- 4540 - 560 -56 P02973 289E 23- 4504 - 611 -61 680467 3175 10- 4504- 390 -30 10- 4504 - 560 -56 10- 4540- 560 -56 10- 4580 - 440 -44 10- 4580 - 560 -56 10- 4620 - 560 -56 40- 4504- 801 -80 ........................ * *" -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS k k 1M - CK §'.�'�> 10- 4620 - 560 -56 109201 2805 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE kkk *k* 063M27 063M27 063M27 063M27 063M27 063M27 063M27 063M27 063M27 063M27 063M27 063M27 063M27 063M27 063M27 kkk * *k 063M29 063M29 k k k k k k 063M32 063M32 063M32 063M32 k *A * ** 063M35 kkk * ** 063M46 063M46 063M46 k k k k k k 063M49 * ** *k* 063M68 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 83.21 03 -04 -91 PAGE 17 ACCOUNT NO. INV: # P.O. # MESSAGE * ** -CKS 02/25/91 199'.50 MERIT SUPPLY LABEL STRIPPER 10- 4504-325 -30 26211 2970 02/22/91 104.25 MERIT SUPPLY LINERS 10- 4504 - 325 -30 26258 3064 02/25/91 379.00 MERIT SUPPLY ICE MELT 10- 4512 - 540 -54 26182 2959 02/22/91 469.60 MERIT SUPPLY ICE MELT 10- 4520 - 318 -30 26272 3154 02/22/91 438.00 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 10- 4620 - 560 -56 26256 3144 02/25/91 234.00 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 10- 4620 - 560 -56 26172 2891 02/25/91 189.00 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 23- 4512 - 612 -61 26257 3145 02/26/91 138.00 MERIT SUPPLY SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 664 -66 26345 3329 02/22/91 101.70 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING 27 -4512- 662 -66 26279 3203 02/22/91 486.70 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 30 -4504- 782 -78 26295 3258 02/22/91 495.10 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 26239 3277 02/22/91 443.70 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 26238 3277 02/22/91 909.00 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 783 -78 26273 3022 02/25/91 147.80 MERIT SUPPLY PAINT 40 -4504- 801 -80 26181 2958 02/25/91 147.80 MERIT SUPPLY PAINT 40 -4504- 803 -80 26230 2987 4,883.15 * * *- CKS,,., 02/22/91 401.60 MESSERLI & KRAMER AMULLANCE COLLECT .10- 3180 - 000 -00 02/22/91 36.00 MESSERLI & KRAMER AMULLANCE COLLECT 10- 3180 - 000 -00 437.60 * ** -CKS 02/22/91 324.57 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632 - 822 -82 3306 02/22/91 392.42 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50 -4632- 842 -84 3328 02/22/91 219.96 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50 -4632- 862 -86 3307 02/26/91 125.28 M AMUNDSON CIGARETTES 50- 4632 - 862 -86 3441 1,062.23 *** -CKS 02/22/91 226,698.00 METRO WASTE CONTROL SEWER SERVICE 40- 4312 - 812 -80 226,698.00 * ** -C KS 02/22/91 18.61 METZ BAKING CO BREAD 27- 4624 - 663 -66 02/26/91 4.52 METZ BAKING CO BREAD 27- 4624- 663 -66 2700 02/26/91 17.60 METZ BAKING CO COST OF GOODS 28- 4624 - 703 -70 40.73 *' * ** -CKS 02/26/91 22.56 MATRX MEDICAL INC AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 10- 4510 - 440 -44 169083 1803 22.56 * * * - CKS.. . 02/25/91 50.85 MN CELLULAR PHONE CAR PHONE 10- 4204 - 100 -10 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -04 -91 PAGE 18. .< CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 063M68 02/25/91 88.87 MN CELLULAR PHONE CAR PHONE 10- 4204 - 140 -14 063M68 02/26/91 62.70 MN CELLULAR PHONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 063M68 02/26/91 62.42 MN CELLULAR PHONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226- 420 -42 063M68 02/26/91 294.17 MN CELLULAR PHONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 063M68 02/26/91 11.87 MN CELLULAR PHONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 063M68 02/26/91 47.61 MN CELLULAR PHONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 063M68 02/26/91 164.75 MN CELLULAR PHONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 063M68 02/26/91 115.35 MN CELLULAR PHONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 063M68 02/26/91 10.36 MN CELLULAR PHONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 063M68 02/26/91 64.69 MN CELLULAR PHONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 063M68 02/26/91 10.40 MN CELLULAR PHONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 063M68 02/26/91 9.58 MN CELLULAR PHONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 063M68 02/26/91 26.35 MN CELLULAR PHONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 420 -42 1,019.97 063M69 02/25/91 225.95 MCC /MIDWEST COST /GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 51482 1828 225.95 * * *- CKS. 063M81 02/22/91 60.00 MN. TORO INC. TRAINING 10- 4202 - 640 -64 172032 3141 063M81 02/22/91 489.86 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 646 -64 171838 3196 063M81 02/22/91 105.78 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 646 -64 171661 3168 063M81 02/25/91 21.87 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 27 -4540- 664 -66 170627 2822 063M81 02/25/91 11.73 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 171473 3168 689.24 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 063M85 02/22/91 50.30 MN. WANNER REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 76868 50.30 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 063M93 02/26/91 89.46 'MOTOROLA INC BATTERIES 10- 4504 - 440 -44 2744 89.46 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 063M97 02/25/91 3,377.42 MPLS FINANCE DEPT. WATER 40- 4640 - 803 -80 3,377.42 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 063N07 02/25/91 33.63 MTS NW SOUND CLIPS 10- 4504 - 520 -52 90049 2015 . 063N07 02/26/91 239.00 MTS NW SOUND REPAIR PARTS 30- 4540 - 782 -78 272.63 * * * * ** * * *- CKS .. 063N09 02/25/91 189.00 MUNICILITE CO. LIGHTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 2736 2957 063N09 02/25/91 370.00 MUNICILITE CO. FOG LIGHTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 2701 2405 559.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 063N13 02/26/91 063N13 02/26/91 kkkkkk 063N16 02/22/91 063N16 02/22/91 063N16 02/22/91 kkkkkk 30- 4252- 782 -78 063N31 02/22/91 063N31 02/22/91 k k k k k k 063N36 02/22/91 kk *kkk 033833 3102 063N72 02/22/91 k k k k k k 063N82 02/25/91 k k k k k k 063N88 02/25/91 kkkkkk 27- 4504 - 664 -66 063N96 02/22/91 kkkkkk 063017 02/26/91 063017 02/26/91 kkkkkk 063099 02/25/91 k k k k k k AMOUNT 47.80 47.80 95.60 * 1,496.02 514.29 54.62 2,064.93 * 216.90 228.40 445.30 * 87.15 87.15 * 1,448.01 1,448.01 * 191.07 191.07 * 533.00 533.00 * 76.00 76.00 * 149.50 1,185.00 1,334.50 * 192.00 192.00 * CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION MUZAK ADVERTISING MUZAK ADVERTISING NSP NSP NSP NERCO DISTRIBUTING NERCO DISTRIBUTING NORTHERN POWER /LIGHT POWER /LIGHT POWER /LIGHT COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY J THOMAS NELSON MINN COMM PAGING OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE PRODUCTS DOROTHY ODLAND COST /GOODS SOLD AC INSTRUCTOR SERVICE CONTRACTS GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIP AC INSTRUCTOR 03 -04 -91 PAGE 19 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O: # MESSAGE:. 50- 4214 - 822 -82 50- 4214 - 862 -86 xk *- CKS.::;, 10- 4252 - 375 -30 ;< 30- 4252- 782 -78 40- 4252 - 801 -80 28- 4624 - 703 -70 033833 3102 28- 4624 - 703 -70 34101 3250 *** CKS 27- 4504 - 664 -66 432590 3249. * ** -CKS 10- 4616- 560 -56 * ** -CKS 23- 4624 - 613 -61 181476 3173 kxk -CKS 23- 4201- 611 -61 * ** -CKS 30- 4288 - 782 -78 10 -4504- 600 -60 133325 2992 10- 4902 - 600 -60 133103 2992 xxx CI(S 23- 4201 - 611 -61 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE _ AMOUNT 063P32 02/26/91 263.89 * ** -CKS GENERAL 263.89 xxxxxx 41453 063P35 02/22/91 100.00 063P35 02/25/91 5.00 063P35 02/25/91 90.23 063P35 02/25/91 11.40 063P35 02/25/91 41.92 063P35 02/25/91 16.94 063P35 02/25/91 15.67 10- 4540 - 560 -56 38253 2981 281.16 xxxxxx 063P44 02/25/91 14,985.30 14,985.30 x x x x x x 063P46 02/25/91 408.78 408.78 xxxxxx 063P48 02/25/91 9.20 9.20 xxxxxx 063P78 02/25/91 65.00 65.00 * xxxxxx 063P84 02/26/91 6.00 6.00 * xxxxxx 063Q09 02/26/91 145.00 145.00 * xxxxxx 063Q20 02/22/91 165.22 063Q20 02/22/91 51.22 - 063Q20 02/22/91 92.94 206.94 *:5 063 02/25/91 312.00 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION PERA INTEREST PENALTY PETERSON- BARBARA PETERSON- BARBARA PETERSON- BARBARA PETERSON- BARBARA PETERSON- BARBARA PETERSON- BARBARA PETERSON - BARBARA PHYSIO CONTROL INCREASE PETTY CASH DUES MILEGAGE UNIFORMS SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES LIFEPAK PIONEER RIM & WHEEL HITCHES PIP PRINTING PRINTERS SERV INC PRO INSTANT PRINT QUALITY REFRIG QUICK SERV BATTERY QUICK SERV BATTERY QUICK SERV BATTERY MONICA RUDQUIST PRINTING SHARPENING 03 -04 -91 PAGE 20 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 10- 4145 - 510 -51 ................ * ** -CKS 30 -1030- 000 -00 30- 4202 - 781 -78 30- 4208 - 781 -78 30- 4262- 782 -78 30- 4504 - 781 -78 30- 4504 - 782 -78 30- 4516 - 781 -78 * ** -CKS 10- 4901 - 440 -44 665192 1798 *x *_CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 196392 3128 x x x - CKS 30- 4600- 781 -78 3348 28- 4274 - 704 -70 58682 x * * - CKS `.. * ** -CKS PT MAINT AC 23- 4120 - 612 -61 * ** -CKS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 490 -49 41453 * ** -CKS MAINT 27- 4288 - 663 -66 108125 * ** -CKS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 52940 2511 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 90426 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 38253 2981 * ** -CKS PT MAINT AC 23- 4120 - 612 -61 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 063R15 02/25/91 729.00 1,041.00 wxxxwx 063R22 02/22/91 462.50 063R22 02/26/91 286.14 01325 748.64 xxwwwx 063R25 02/25/91 132.80 063R25 02/22/91 99.60 063R25 02/26/91 392.95 10- 4901 - 650 -64 1994 625.35 xwwxxw 063R35 02/22/91 135.00 2757 2113 135.00 xxxwwx 063R43 02/22/91 132.17 3245 132.17 xwxwx 063R53 02/22/91 425.00 425.00 xwwwxx w *x CKS 10- 4612 - 560 -56 063R65 02/22/91 3,570.00 063R65 02/22/91 2,712.50 6,282.50 wxwwww **k-CKS 30- 4288 - 782 -78 063R73 02/25/91 51.25 51.25 wwxwxx 23- 4588 - 611 -61 186630 063R81 02/22/91 98.08 98'.08 wxwwwx 64778 2796 063R83 02/22/91 828.00 w w w- CKS 828.00 wxwwww 063S07 02/22/91 9.99 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION MONICA RUDQUIST AC INSTRUCTOR REM SUPPLIES REM SUPPLIES RENTAL EQUIP & SALES RENTAL EQUIP & SALES RENTAL EQUIP & SALES RICHFIELD PLUMB CO RITEWAY ROBERT B. HILL ,ROLLINS OIL CO 'ROLLINS OIL CO 'ROTO ROOTER SERV RUBENSTEIN & ZIFF RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON SPRUCE CO GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PARTS REPAIR PARTS CHAIN SAW REPAIR REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES GASOLINE GASOLINE SERVICE CRAFT SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS LAUNDRY 03 -04 -91 PAGE ii: ACCOUNT NO,. I,NV; # P. 0_ # MESSAGE ;; 23- 4201 - 611 -61 K. 30 -4504- 782 -78 1385 3335 30- 4504 - 782 -78 01325 xwx CKS 10- 4540- 644 -64 1984 3070 10- 4540 - 644 -64 1908. 2973. =: 10- 4901 - 650 -64 1994 3298 28 -4248- 702 -76 2757 2113 ww* -CKS .: 10- 4540 - 560 -56 35624M 3245 28- 4504 - 702 -70 44121 3426 w *x CKS 10- 4612 - 560 -56 10- 4612- 560 -56 **k-CKS 30- 4288 - 782 -78 108893 * ** -CKS 23- 4588 - 611 -61 186630 3176 * ** -CKS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 64778 2796 w w w- CKS 30 -4262- 782 -78 212540 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 063507 02/22/91 * * * * ** SUBURBAN 063521 02/25/91 * * * * ** CHEVROLET 063525 02/22/91 * * * * ** 43.58 063527 02/22/91 063527 02/22/91 063527 02/22/91 * * * * ** 063545 02/25/91 136.03 SUBURBAN 063554 02/25/91 * * * * ** CHEVROLET 063S72 02/26/91 1063S72 02/26/91 063573 02/22/91 * * * * ** SUBURBAN 063577 02/25/91 063577 02/22/91 063577 02/22/91 063577 02/22/91 063577 02/25/91 063577 02/25/91 063577 02/25/91 063577 02/22/91 063577 02/22/91 063577 02/22/91 063578 02/26/91 063578 02/26/91 AMOUNT 81.75 91.74 875.00 875.00 111.00 111.00 9.99 220.72 31.26 261.97 69.36 69.36 584.00 584.00 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION SPRUCE CO LAUNDRY B SIEWERT CREATNS ADVERTISING OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC COST OF GOODS SHERWIN WILLIAMS SHERWIN WILLIAMS SHERWIN WILLIAMS ST. PAUL BOOK STAR TRIBUNE 18.75 STREICHERS 37.75 STREICHERS 56.50 * 461.89 STRGAR - ROSCOE -FAUSH 461.89 * 22.09 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 142.00 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 93.68 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 14.75 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 16.45 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 43.58 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 63.12 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 51.54 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 136.03 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 42.86 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 626.10 64.26 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP 29.19 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP BLINDS PAINT PAINT OFFICE SUPPLIES ADVERTISING AMMUNITION AMMUNITION PRO ENG SERVICES PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 03 -04 -91 PAGE 22 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.:.* MESSAGE 30- 4262 - 782 -78 145503 3339 30- 4600 - 781 -78 829A 3324 28- 4624 - 703 -70 4H7327 3016 10- 4540 - 540 -54 7744 -6 3151 10- 4542 - 325 -30 2984 -9 3146 10- 4544 - 646 -64 3118 -3 3225 10- 4504 - 540 -54 35706 3130 27- 4214 - 667 -66 3190 10- 4572 - 420 -42 10- 4572 - 420 -42 60- 1300 - 291 -04 10- 4540- 560 -56 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10- 4540- 560 -56 10- 4540- 560 -56 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10- 4540 - 560 -56 30- 4540 - 782 -78 30- 4540 - 782 -78 140488 140847 140749 140670 140443 140481 140362 140773 140724 140844 1945 3101 * * *- CKS * ** -CKS * * * -CK5 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -04 -91 PAGE 23 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE; <i....i 93.45 063S95 02/22/91 429.56 SERVICE SALES CORP MONARCH LABELS 50- 4516 - 820 -82 42852 2855 063S95 02/22/91 429.56 SERVICE SALES CORP MOARCH LABELS 50 -4516- 840 -84 42852 2855 063S95 02/22/91 429.56 SERVICE SALES CORP MOARCH LABELS 50- 4516- 860 -86 42852 2855 1,288.68 * * * * ** * ** -CKS° 063T13 02/26/91 218.40 TOM HORWATH FORESTRY 10- 4201 - 644 -64 063T13 02/26/91 624.00 TOM HORWATH TRIMMING 10- 4201 - 980 -64 842.40 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 063T40 02/22/91 29.33 TOLL COMPANY TOOLS 30 -4580- 782 -78 109775 2627 29.33 * * * * ** * * *- CKS_.. 063T66 02/22/91 6.50 TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT CRAFT SUPPLIES 23- 4588 - 611 -61 419560 2721 6.50 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 063T96 02/25/91 86.00 TWIN CITY GAR. DOOR REPAIR WORK 10- 4540 - 540 -54 15962 3086 86.00 063U05 02/22/91 48.55 US WEST CELLULAR TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 510 -51 063U05 02/22/91 31.71 'US WEST CELLULAR TELEPHONE 30- 4256 - 782 -78 80.26 * * * *** * * *- CKS'.,. 063008 02/26/91 40.00 UNIFORM UNLIMITED SHIRTS 10- 4266 7440 -44 15159 .2745 40.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS' 063U14 02/25/91 29.00 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP PLUGS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 107900 3058 063014 02/22/91 89.77 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 540 -54 3206 118.77 *' * * * * ** * ** -CKS 063U17 02/25/91 188.00 UHL CO CALIBRATION TEST 10- 4540 - 540 -54 60976 8131 188.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS: 063U20 02/26/91 45.00 UNIVERSITY OF MN SCHOOL 10 -4202- 640 -64 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -04 -91 PAGE 24 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 063U20 02/26/91 45.00 UNIVERSITY OF MN SCHOOL 10- 4202 - 640 -64 3321 90.00 kkkkkk k k " - .CKS. °;;:.:. 063U25 02/26/91 78.49 UNIVERSAL MED SERV AMBUALANCE EQUIP 10- 4504- 440 -44 4105 2743 78.49 kkkkkk k k * -CKS� 063V30 02/26/91 63.35 VANTAGE ELECTRIC REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 702 -70 11498 3254 63.35 kkkkkk * ** -CKS 063V48 02/22/91 349.79 VOTER REG /ELEC SECT POSTAGE 10- 4290 - 140 -14 349.79 kkkkkk " ** -CKS 063W41 02/25/91 870.55 WEST PHOTO PHOTO SUPPLIES 10- 4508 - 420 -42 16226 3263 870.55 kkkkkk * ** -CKS 063W66 02/25/91 16.12 WILLIAMS STEEL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 313151 063W66 02/25/91 38.69 WILLIAMS STEEL SUPPLIES 40- 4540 - 801 -80 315992 54.81 k k k k k k k R k,- CKS....... 063W99 02/25/91 156.00 CYD WICKER AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 156.00 k k k k k k * ** -CKS.: 063X05 02/25/91 126.00 XEROX CORP MAINT 10- 4288 - 510 -51 126.00 * kkkkkk kkk -CKS 063Z05 02/25/91 106.75 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE GENERAL SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 3352 106.75 * kkkkkk kkk -CK S'.:�.:. 063Z14 02/25/91 16.56 ZIEGLER INC PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 16464 3134 16.56 kkkkkk kkk - CKS:.;: �: 063Z99 02/25/91 182.00 BOBO ZINN AC INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 182.00 k k k k k k * ** -CKS 03 -04 -91 PAGE 25 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE GENERAL FUND C.D.B.G. COMMUNICATIONS ART CENTER CAPITAL FUND GOLF COURSE FUND RECREATION CENTER FUND GUN RANGE FUND EDINBOROUGH PARK UTILITY FUND STORM SEWER UTILITY LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND CONSTRUCTION FUND 1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR 134,871.94 FUND 10 TOTAL 35.00 FUND 11 TOTAL 31.30 FUND 12 TOTAL 9,877.88 FUND 23 TOTAL 1,799.72 FUND 25 TOTAL 8,508.95 FUND 27 TOTAL 2,615.67 FUND 28 TOTAL 220.34 FUND 29 TOTAL 12,146.01 FUND 30 TOTAL 239,001.80 FUND 40 TOTAL 601.14 FUND 41 TOTAL 5,984.43 FUND 50 TOTAL 6,649.99 FUND 60 TOTAL 422,344.17 TOTAL 03 -04 -91 PAGE 25 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE GENERAL FUND C.D.B.G. COMMUNICATIONS ART CENTER CAPITAL FUND GOLF COURSE FUND RECREATION CENTER FUND GUN RANGE FUND EDINBOROUGH PARK UTILITY FUND STORM SEWER UTILITY LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND CONSTRUCTION FUND