HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-03-04_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
MARCH 4, 1991
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL - HRA & COUNCIL
COUNCIL PROCLAMATION - CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME AWARENESS WEEK
ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS - Adopt
Commissioners as to HRA items and by the
agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *)
are considered to be routine and will be
separate discussion of such items unless
requests, in which case the item will be
in its normal sequence on the Agenda. ,
ion of Consent Agenda Items is made by the
Council Members as to Council items. All
and in bold print are Consent Agenda Items and
enacted by one motion. There will be no
a Commissioner or Council Member or citizen so
removed from the Consent Agenda and considered
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
* I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA MEETING OF FEBRUARY 19, 1991
* II. PAYMENT OF HRA CLAWS
III. ADJOURNMENT OF HRA
EDINA CITY'COUNCIL
* I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of Regular Meetings of January 7 'and 22, 1991
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close.hearing.
Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall'vote
of.all members of .Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property
Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass.
A. Temporary Conditional Use Permit - Home Occupation - Dr. Joyce Anderson,
7121 Glouchester Avenue
B. Appeal of Board of Appeals and Adjustments Decision - .Setback and Height
Variances - U.S. West NewVector Group, 5600 Lincoln Drive
C. Final Plat Approval - Farrells Parkwood Knolls - 5700 Blake Road
D. Request to Reconsider Conditional Use Permit - Hennepin County Library -
7001 York Avenue
E. Set Hearing Date (03/18/91)
1. RMD, Regional Medical District to POD -1, Planned Office District -
Lot 2, Block 2, Southdale Acres - Diversified Credit Union, 6525 Drew
Avenue So
2. Preliminary Plat`Approval - Brennan Addition - Lot 5, Block 7, Indian
Hills
III. PUBLIC HEARING - SALE OF STRONG BEER IN RESTAURANTS HOLDING WINE LICENSES
IV. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
Agenda
Edina City Council
March 4, 1991
Page 2
V.
AWARD OF BIDS
*
A. Case Skid Loader Attachment
*
B. Signs for Yorkdale Liquor Store
VI.
REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Mon
A. On Sale Wine License and On Sale'3.2 Beer License - Two Guys from Italy,
18
7495 France Avenue So
7:00
B. Feasibility Report - Sidewalks— Set Hearing Date
Council
C. Solid Waste Collection Options
*
D. Yard Waste Rebate Application
19
E. Appointments to Advisory Boards /Commissions /Committees ,
6:00
F. Appointment to The Edina Foundation Board
Braemar
G. Appointments to East Edina Housing Foundation Board
VII.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
VIII.
SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
IX.
POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
X.
FINANCE
*
A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 03/04/91: Total
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Sat
Mar
.9
Council Strategic Planning'Meeting
8:00
a.m.
Arneson
Acres
Mon
Mar
18
Regular Council Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council
Room
Tues
Mar
19
Annual Council /Advisory Boards Dinner Meeting
6:00
p.m.
Braemar
Clubhouse
Mon
Apr
1
Regular CounciliMeeting
7:00
p.m.
Council
Room
Mon
Apr
15
Regular Council Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council
Room
Mon
Apr
22
Board of Review
5:00
p.m.
Council
Room
Tues
Apr
23
Annual Volunteers Reception
5:00
p.m.
Edinborough Pa
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Association of Minne
P. O. Box 38036 Minneapolis, MN 55438 612 - 943 -2769
CFS A syndrome characterized by persistent, incapacitating fatigue
January 21, 1991
I thank you in advance for your assistance in the recognition of CFS as a serious
health concern in Edina and our state. We look forward to meeting you in March.
Sincerely,
Judy Bitsso
President
Enclosures
The Honorable Fred Richards
Honorary Member
Mayor of Edina
of the Board
4801 W. 50th St.
Gov. Rudy Perpich
Edina; Minnesota 55424
Board Of Directors
Judy Basso;
President
Dear Mayor Richards,
Brian Lutterman,
Vice President
Penny Crandall,
I am writing on behalf of our members in y request y
g your city, t0 r UBSt thet OU 1SSUe 81
Treasurer.
official proclamation which designates March 3 - 9, 1991 as Chronic Fatigue
JulieeCKlott Bach,
Syndrome Awareness Week in Edina. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS), a poorly
Karalee Beierschmitt
understood disorder, was officially defined by the Centers for Disease Control is
John Seagard
1988. In cooperation with the National Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Association,
Jean Cole
Bill LaVictoire
organizations such as ours across the county are contacting their
Y g government
Helen Ahlbrecht
officials addressing the need for increased understanding of this recently
Medical Advisors
recognized.and debilitating disease. The National CFS Association has encourage
Allan C. Kind,
us to request that the first week in March be established in communities across
M.D.
Phillip K. Peterson,
Minnesota for CFS awareness.
M.D.
Christian G. Schrock,
I have enclosed information about CFS for your review, including a sample CFS
proclamation for your consideration. According to a University of Minnesota
Nurse ate
researcher, approximately 28Z of people with CFS are vocationally disabled. T
R.N.
loss to society of talented and highly motivated individuals, many of whom are
stricken by CFS in their 30's, is great.
Advisors
Linda Beierschmitt,
A.A.
In addition to my request that you issue a CFS proclamation, I would also like to
Terrie Cummings,
R.N., B.S.N.
invite you t0 p g g yo
Y present it to our members at an u cumin meeting to be held in i
`Richard Kofsky,
city, and which will be open to the general public. We would be honored to have
Ph.D.. L.C.P.
Beth van den Berg,
your participation in our first public event intended to heighten awareness of
P P P g
B.S., O.T.R.
CFS. This celebration will be held from i -4pm, Sunday, March 3, at Southdale
Hennepin County Library, 7001 York Avenue South, in Edina.
Please contact me if you need any additional information concerning either
request'.
I thank you in advance for your assistance in the recognition of CFS as a serious
health concern in Edina and our state. We look forward to meeting you in March.
Sincerely,
Judy Bitsso
President
Enclosures
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Association of Minnes
P. O. Box 38036 Minneapolis, MN 55438 612 - 943 -2769
CFS A syndrome characterized by persistent, incapacitating fatigue
Honorary Member
of the Board
Gov. Rudy Perpich
Board Of Directors
Judy Basso,
President
Brian Lutterman,
Vice President
Penny Crandall,
Treasurer
Julie Klotzbach,
Secretary
Karalee Beierschmitt
John Seagard
Jean Cole
Bill LaVictoire
Helen Ahlbrecht
Medical Advisors
Allan C. Kind,
M.D.
Phillip K. Peterson,
M.D.
Christian G. Schrock,
M.D.
Nurse Advocate
Jeri Stroud,
R.N.
Advisors
Linda Beierschmitt,
A.A.
Terrie Cummings,
R.N., B.S.N.
Richard Kofsky,
Ph.D., L.C.P.
Beth van den Berg,
B.S., O.T.R.
Sample Proclamation for Mayors
City of , Minnesota
Proclamation
Whereas: Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) is a recently defined
illness characterized by incapacitating fatigue and
weakness, an array of flu -like symptoms and cognitive
problems, and;
Whereas:
These symptoms may last for many months or years, are
often severely debilitating, and most often affect people
under the age of 45, and:
Whereas:
As not all physicians are familiar with CFS, many times
it is incorrectly diagnosed because the symptoms appear
similiar to other illnesses, and;
Whereas:
An important part of our workforce and society is affected
by CFS and proper treatment for the illness is not
well - defined, and;
Whereas:
It is important that we build a greater knowledge and
awareness of CFS, and increase research funding, in order
to help the significant number of Americans who suffer
from this syndrome:
Now, Therefore, \1, , Mayor of
Minnesota, do hereby proclaim the week of March 3 -9, 1991 as
CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME AWARENESS WEEK
in , Minnesota, to increase understanding of CFS in our
community.
MINUTES
OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
FEBRUARY 19, 1991
ROL CALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and
Chairman Richards.
HRA CONSENT ITEMS ADOPTED' Motion was made by Commissioner Kelly and was
seconded by Commissioner Smith to approve and adopt the BRA consent items as
presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice; Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF FEBRUARY'4, 1991 APPROVED Motion was made by
Commissioner Belly and was seconded by Commissioner Smith to approve the HRA
Minutes of the meeting of February 4, 1991.
Motion carried on rollcall vote.
*CLAIMS'PAID motion was made by Commissioner Kelly and was seconded by
Commissioner Smith to approve payment of the following HRA claims as shown in
detail on the Check Register dated 2/19/91 and consisting of one page.totaling
$166,103.7=3.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chairman Richards declared
the meeting adjourned.
Executive Director .
1991 CITY OF EDINA HRA
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT
032700 02/14/91 14,166.67
14,166.67
* * * * **
046701 02/15/91 4,222.00
4,222.00
* * * * **
18,388.67
18,388.67
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
PARTNERS /SR COMM INTEREST
ALDO' INC PHASE 4
FUND 01 TOTAL FUND HRA
TOTAL
02 -19 -91 PAGE 1
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
01- 4302 - 133 -12 MANUAL
* ** -CKS
01- 1315 - 132 -12 MANUAL
* ** -CKS
APPROVW FOR PAYMlm
mac. ftVMWM DOW
PAOs -- —.
iHRp{�k
HRA Claims (Received 3/4/91)
1991 CITY
OF EDINA HRA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
063700
03/01/91
14,166.67
PARTNERS FOR SR
PAYMENT
14,166.67 *
063701
03/01/91
179.95
TAMARACK
PARK MAINT AREA
179.95 *
063702
03/01/91
2,325.00
HAGEN COMP
PARK MAINT AREA
2,325.00 *
063703
03/01/91
9,826.27
WALKER PARK CONSULT
ENGNEERING FEES
063703
03/01/91
79.29
WALKER PARK CONSULT
ENG FEES
9,905.56 *
063704
03/01/91
500.00
MN VALLEY LSCAPE
IMPROVEMENTS
500.00 *
063705
03/01/91
8,413.68
METRO ELECTRIC
PARK CONSTRTN
8,413.68 *
063706
03/01/91
26,029.65
BLAINE HTG.AIR
PARK CONSTRTN
26,029.65 *
063707
03/01/91
14,347.22
BRW INC
ARCH FEES
063707
03/01/91
111.97
BRW INC
ARCH FEES
063707
03/01/91
1,126.43
BRW INC
ARCH FEES
15,585.62 *
063708
03/01/91
4,552.00
DISCOM OF MN
RADIOS
4,552.00 *
063709
03/01/91
1,005.00
CLEAN FLO LAB
INDIANHEAD LK TREAT
063709
03/01/91
1,005.00-
CLEAN FLO LAB
INDIANHEAD LK TREAT
.00 *
063710
03/01/91
219.00
GEPHART ELECTRIC
PARK IMPROVEMENTS
063710
03/01/91
219.00-
GEPHART ELECTRIC
PARK IMPROVEMENTS
.00 *
063711
03/01/91
23,108.00
TC CONSTRUCTION
PARK CENTRUM
23,108.00 *
063712
03/01/91
270.00
JACKSON LANDSCAPE
RES IMPROVEMENTS
270.00 *
063713
03/01/91
2,275.00
WITZEL TREE MOVING
RES IMPROVEMENTS
2,275.00 *
063714
03/01/91
2,940.00
NORDQUIST SIGN CO
RES IMPROVEMNT
2,940.00 *
063715
03/01/91
1,520.00
PLYMOUTH DRYWELL
RES IMPROVEMNT
1,520.00 *
kkkkkk
111,771.13
FUND 01 TOTAL
FUND HRA
03 -04 -91 PAGE
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
01- 4302 - 133 -12
01- 1390 - 132 -12 140606
01 -1390- 132 -12 378
01 =1319- 131 -12 66485
01- 1319 - 131 -12 66442
01- 1315 - 132 -12 9072A
01- 1390 - 132 -12
01- 1390 - 132 -12
01- 1319 - 131 -12 61216
01- 1319 - 132 -12 61298
01- 1319 - 132 -12 53936A
01- 1340 - 132 -12 82652 351
10- 4201 - 358 -30 5568
10- 4201 - 358 -30 5568
01- 1390 - 133 -12 13072
01- 1390 - 133 -12 13072
01- 1390 - 132 -12
01- 1315- 132 -12 1860 382
01- 1315 - 132 -12
01- 1315 - 132 -12 12437
01- 1315- 132 -12
1
* * * -CKS
1991 CITY OF EDINA HRA CHECK REGISTER 03 -04 -91 PAGE 2
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
111,771.13 TOTAL
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
JANUARY 7, 1991 .
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor Pro -Tem
Kelly.
OATHS OF OFFICE TAKEN The oath of office as Council Member was administered by
the City Clerk to Jack Rice, and Glenn L. Smith who had been elected for four year
terms to January 1, 1995.
APPOINTMENT OF MAYOR PRO -TEM Member Rice made a motion to appoint Member Kelly as
Mayor Pro -Tem. Motion was seconded by Member Smith.
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Motion carried.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Member Paulus, and was seconded by
Member Rice to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Motion carried.
PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR BELFRY ADDITION DENIED UPON ADOPTION OF FINDINGS OF FACT
Planner Larsen presented Findings, Decision, and Reasons in support for denial of
the application of Richard Belfry for the subdivision of Lot 67, Morningside, in
response to Council action of December 17, 1990. Copies of the Findings have been
delivered to Peter Bachman, attorney for Mr. Belfry, with a copy by mail to
Mr. Belfry. A copy of the Findings were also delivered to Annette Christianson,
4247 Grimes Avenue South, the contact person for the neighborhood.
Planner Larsen noted that.neither Mr., Belfry or Mr. Bachman,,his attorney, were
present and recommended that the opening recital paragraph be amended to indicate
that they were present on December 17,1990, but not on January 7, 1991. Member
Smith suggested that the opening paragraph be further amended to indicate that
copies of the Findings, Decision, and Reasons had been sent to Mr. Belfry and Mr.
Bachman prior to the meeting. He also noted a misspelled word on line six of page
five '- "wold" should be "would ".
Member Smith made a motion that the Findings, Decision, and Reasons document be
amended to reflect the suggested changes. Motion was seconded by Member Rice.
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Motion carried.
Mayor Pro -Tem then called for public comment on the draft Findings, Decisions, and
Reasons in support of denial of the proposed subdivision. No public comment or
objections were heard.
Member Smith made a motion to adopt the Findings, Decision, and Reasons as amended
(copy attached) and to deny the application of Richard Belfry for the subdivision
of Lot 67, Morningside. Motion to adopt the Findings was seconded by Member Rice.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Motion carried.
LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR 6610 AND 6620 NORMANDALE ROAD (ENGS_TROM MARNIE ADDITION
Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of
the following resolution:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute various separate
parcels:
Parcel A - Lot 1, Block 1, ENGSTROM MARNIE ADDITION
v
Parcel B - That part of Government Lot 3, Section 4, Township 116, Range 21,
described as follows: Beginning at a point 230 feet South of North
line and 117 feet West of East,line of said Government Lot 3, in
said Section 4, said point of beginning being in West line of right
of way of State Trunk Highway No. 100; thence South parallel with
East line of said Section 4, a distance of 200 feet, thence West
parallel with North line of Government Lot 3, a distance of 350 feet,
thence North parallel with East line of said Section 4 a distance of
200 feet thence East 350 feet to point of beginning; and
WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to subdivide said'tracts
into the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "Parcels "):
Lot 1, Block 1, ENGSTROM MARNIE ADDITION, and the southerly 6 feet of
Parcel B as described above
and
That part of Government Lot 3, Section 4, Township 116, Range 21,
described as follows: Beginning at a point 230 feet South of North
line and 117 feet West.of East line of said Government Lots 3, in
said Section 4, said point of beginning being in West line of right
of way of State Trunk Highway No. 100; thence South parallel with
East line of said Section 4, a distance of 200 feet, thence West
parallel with North line of Government Lot 3, a distance of 350 feet,
thence North parallel with East line of said Section 4 a distance of
200 feet thence East 350 feet to point of beginning, except for the
Southerly 6 feet thereof.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said
Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the
Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinances
Nos. 804 and 825;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by.the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is
hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 804 and
Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof
as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any
other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further
subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent
ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may
be provided for by those ordinances.
Resolution adopted on rollcall vote, four ayes.
LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR 5901 -5903 VIEW LANE (LOT 30. BLOCK 3. KILLARNEY SHORES
Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of
the following resolution:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land:.
Lot 30, Block 3, KILLARNEY SHORES
WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate
parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows:
Description of Southerly Parcel:
All that part of Lot 30, Block 3, KILLARNEY SHORES which lies southerly of a
line drawn from a point on the westerly line of said Lot 30 distant 73.78
feet southeasterly of the northwest corner thereof to a point on the
easterly line of said Lot 30 distant 92.19 feet southeasterly of the most
northerly corner of said Lot 30.
Description of Northerly Parcel:
Lot 30, Block 3, KILLARNEY SHORES, except that part which lies Westerly of a
line drawn from a point on the Northwesterly line of the above described
tract distant 32.0 feet Northeasterly of the Northwest corner of said lot, to
a point on the West line of said lot distant 26.0 feet Southeasterly of the
Northwest corner of said lot as measured along said line. Also except that
part which lies southerly of a line drawn from a point on the westerly line
of said Lot 30 distant 73.78 feet southeasterly of the northwest corner
thereof to a point on the easterly line of said Lot 30 distant 92.19 feet
southeasterly, of the most northerly corner of said Lot 30.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said
Parcels as separate tracts of.land do not interfere with the purposes of the
Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinances
Nos. 804 and 825;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is
hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 804 and'
Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof
as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any
other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further
subdivision be made.of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent
ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval.of this Council as may
be provided for by those ordinances.
Resolution adopted on rollcall vote, four ayes.
HEARING DATE OF 01/22/91 SET FOR VARIOUS PLANNING MATTERS Motion was made by
Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Rice setting January 22, 1991, as hearing
date for the following Planning matters:
1) Conditional Use Permit - Building Expansion - Hennepin County Library - 7001
York Avenue
2) Temporary Conditional Use Permit - Home Occupation - Dr. Joyce Anderson - 7121
Glouchester Avenue
3) Preliminary Plat Approval - Farrells Parkwood Knolls — Tract A, R.L.S. 1286 -
5700 Blake Road.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes.
COUNCIL TO REVIEW AND RESPOND TO MASSING SURVEY Planner Larsen presented a
massing survey that had been prepared for the Council to review of 21 single
family homes-'which are spread throughout the community. Included are examples of
new.construction on new lots or previously vacant lots, old homes that have been
removed and new.homes built in their place, additions and major remodelings that
have occurred recently.
Staff is having difficulty addressing the problem of massing and has looked
exhaustively at various other approaches to further restrictions, including what
other communities have done. For example, in Lake Forest, Illinois, they were
.attacking a different problem (massive houses built in former fields that were not
softened by mature trees and landscaping). With the variety of development and
lot sizes in Edina, every approach staff has considered seems to fall apart as
soon as you move from one neighborhood to.the next.
Planner Larsen explained that the homes in the survey are not necessarily examples
of good or bad development on which to make judgements, but are cases on which
staff would like to get individual Council reaction and how they relate to the
rules now in place. It is hoped that, through a consensus, the Council may be
able to identify any particular problems and in what specific areas those might
be. Staff anticipates that the survey review will be a 2 -3 week process..
Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly said she hoped the Council would be able;to review a few of
the houses in the survey so that there could be some philosophic discussion on the
massing issue at the Council Work Session scheduled for January 12.
I -494 CORRIDOR COMIIISSION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT APPROVED Planner Larsen
explained that the I -494 Corridor Commission Joint Powers Organization (JPO) needs
staff help in developing Travel Demand Management (TDM) strategies leading to a
TDM Ordinance to be adopted by all five cities. The JPO has recommended hiring a
half -time individual for one year to develop the TDM program at a total cost of
$15,000. Fifty percent of the cost will be covered by a Metropolitan Council
grant and the remaining $7,500 is within the JPO budget.
Member Paulus introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that it hereby
approves the Professional Services Agreement recommended by the I -494 Corridor
Commission Joint Powers Organization,
BE IT FURTHER resolved that the Mayor and Manager hereby are authorized and
directed to execute the Agreement on behalf of.the City.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Smith.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Resolution adopted.
SEVER BACKUP CLAIM OF RICHARD MILLER, 5340 HOLLYWOOD ROAD, ACKNOWLEDGED: MATTER
CONTINUED TO 1122/91 IF NOT RESOLVED.Manager Rosland directed the Council's
attention to a notice of claim for residence sewer backup at 5340 Hollywood Road,
dated December 10, 1990, and a subsequent letter dated January 3, 1991, from
Richard R. Miller, the property owner, with additional information. The claim was
referred to the City's insurance company who denied the claim.. Manager Rosland
stated that staff would like to review the facts and would recommend that the
matter be continued to January 22, 1991, unless it is resolved prior to then.
Richard Miller, 5340 Hollywood Road, was present and agreed to the continuation of
the matter. Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly asked that the record acknowledge receipt of Mr.
Miller's letter of January 3, 1991.
*BID AWARDED FOR CASCADE WELL SEALING PROJECT Motion was made by Member Paulus
and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for water well sealing project
Cascade Well, to recommended low bidder, Bergerson- Caswell, at .$5,990.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR SNOW PLOW AND WING Notion was made by Member Paulus and was
seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for one snow plow and wing to recommended
low bidder, Little Falls Machine, Inc., at $7.125.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes.
BID AWARDED FOR SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION AT 6809 NORNANDALE ROAD (HC -12):
CONNECTION CHARGES TO BE LEVIED AGAINST PROPERTY Manager Rosland explained that a
house has been moved onto the property at 6809 Normandale Road and the owner has
requested the sanitary sewer connection. The property owner, Ronald L. Carlson,
has made two digs and has been unable to locate the connection. He has asked for
some relief from the City. Manager Rosland pointed out that the City's policy has
been and continues to be that.the property owner must bear the Cost of water and
sewer connection to the tap in the street. The relief offered by the City would
be to order the work for the sanitary sewer connection and assess the cost of the
project against the property for six years at 9% interest. In order for the
project to be assessed, the owner must sign an easement, petition, waiver and
release form.
Ronald L. Carlson, 6809 Normandale Road, presented written background information
on his request that the City should:
1) Provide the lateral sewer connection ( #171) to the property line at no
additional cost to the property owner because these assessments have been paid.
2) Waive the requirement of an "air test" of the pipe to the building so as to
expedite completion of the work and reduce cost to-the property owner.
3) Reimburse the property owner an estimated $3,827.00 for added expense due to
the frost season and unproductive digs.
Member Paulus commented that any additional cost may be the responsibility of the
seller of the property if the seller had represented to Mr. Carlson that the
assessments had been paid and,the connections were readily available. Further
discussion and questions relating to the request of the property owner followed.
Member Smith then made a motion for award of bid for sanitary sewer connection at
6809 Pormandale Road to lofr bidder, Hopkins Plumbing & Heating Company, at
$3,710.00, subject to the property owner signing an easement, petition, waiver and
release form. Motion was seconded by Member Rice.
Ayes: Paulus; Rice, Smith, Kelly
Motion carried.
Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption, subject
to the property owner signing an easement, petition, waiver and release form:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as'follows:
1. It is hereby found and determined that a petition has been filed requesting
the Council to construct sanitary sewer improvement connection at 6809 Normandale
Road and to assess the entire cost -of the improvement against the property of the
petitioner, and that said petition has been signed by all owners of real property
where said improvement is to be located.
2. The making of said improvement in accordance with said petition is hereby
ordered pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.031(3), (Session Laws of 1961,
Chapter 525, Section 1). Said improvement is hereby designated and shall be
referred to in all subsequent proceedings as follows:
SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION NO. HC -12
The entire cost of said improvement is hereby ordered to be assessed against the
property.(PIN 30- 028 -24 -33 -0094) described as follows:
Lot 9 except Hwy, NORMANDALE TERRACE
where said improvement is to be located.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Rice.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Resolution adopted.
*BID AWARDED FOR CODIFICATION OF ORDINANCES lotion was made by Member Paulus and
was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for codification of ordinances to
recommended bidder, LMC - CLEAR Codification Services, at $5,876.00, plus $28/hr
for new material.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes.
H.R.A. COMMISSIONERS APPOINTED Motion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded��
by Member Rice for consent of Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly's appointment of the following
Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority commissioners:
Bernard G. Rice, Jr. 01/02/95,
Glenn L. Smith 01/02/95
Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes.
SOLID WASTE SOURCE REDUCTION PLAN APPROVED Manager Rosland informed the Council
that in order to remain eligible for recycling funding from Hennepin County,
cities must have a solid waste source reduction plan. He stated that Janet
Chandler, Recycling Coordinator, has drafted a proposed plan which lists current
City policies which minimize waste, and recommends additional practices to reduce
waste.
Member Rice introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Edina, Minnesota, that it hereby approves
the Solid haste Source'Reduction Plan for the City of Edina, dated 01/03/91 and as
presented by the Recycling Coordinator.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Smith.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith,,Kelly
Resolution adopted.
EXPENDITURE OF FORFEITURE MONIES CONTINUED TO JANUARY 22, 1991 MEETING Manager
Rosland advised the Council that forfeiture money has been accumulated over the
last several years to a sum of slightly over $40,000. Guidelines for its
expenditure are quite specific. The Council was referred to a memorandum dated
January 3, 1991 from Chief Craig Swanson wherein he recalled that during the 1991
budget hearings, drug forfeiture funds were mentioned as a way of funding new
equipment and programs that would enhance police efficiency. Chief Swanson would
recommend the planned expenditures of forfeiture funds as listed in his
memorandum.
Member Smith made a motion to continue the approval of expenditures of forfeiture
monies to the meeting of January 22, 1991, when all Council Members would be
present. Motion was seconded by Member Rice.
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith
Nays: Kelly
Motion carried.
EXCUSED ABSENCES POLICY TO BE DRAFTED FOR ADVISORY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS Manager
Rosland referred to a letter dated November 14, 1990, from Robert Christianson,
Chair of the Park Board, requesting an exception to the attendance policy in order
that a board member can continue to serve. The current ordinance provides that
any member of an advisory board, commission or committee who fails to attend three
consecutive meetings or who fails to attend any four meetings in twelve months may
be removed from office by the Mayor with the consent of the Council. Manager
Rosland suggested that in some cases there may be extenuating circumstances
regarding absences which should be taken into consideration.
Member Smith made a motion directing staff to draft an excused absence policy for
advisory board and commissions, to be handled at the board /commission level, to be
brought back for Council consideration. Motion was seconded by Member Paulus.
In discussing the motion, Member Rice said he would not be in favor of a general
excused absence policy because there would be the potential for abuse and, even
though there may be unavoidable circumstances that cause a member to miss a
meeting, he strongly felt it important that all members be in attendance. To have
this handled at the board /commission level would put the chairs in a difficult
position. Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly said she agreed with Member Rice but felt that
there may be an exception in certain cases. Member Smith said a policy would
give members an expectation as to exceptions. Manager Rosland explained that the
policy.he was suggesting would include notification of the absence to the chair of
the board or commission, concurrence of the chair, and then to the Mayor for
approval, with the consent of the Council. Member Paulus said she felt a letter
should be sent to the chair of boards and commissions advising them of the policy
and asking them to notify the Council if they foresee an attendance problem.
Member Rice suggested that, if there are circumstances whereby a member will miss
several consecutive meetings, the member should consider resigning and requesting
reappointment after the situation is cleared up.
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Motion carried.
FINANCIAL HEALTH PROFILE FOR CITY OF EDINA REVIEWED Manager Rosland presented a
summary, as requested by the Council, of the Financial Health Profile for the City
of Edina compiled by the Minnesota Office of.the State Auditor. Current
expenditures per capita for year end 1989 for Edina showed a total of $339.52 as
compared with Minneapolis at $885.61 (highest City) and Brooklyn Park at $261.38
(lowest City). Revenues per capita showed a total of $462.59 for Edina (lowest
city) as compared with Minneapolis at $1159.21 (highest City). The figures
indicate that the City.of Edina functions very inexpensively in relationship to
other cities in the metropolitan area
It was the consensus of the Council that the citizens of Edina should be made
aware of this information and that it be included in the About Town publication.
VACANCY ON LNG BOARD OF DIRECTORS NOTED Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly noted that there is a
vacancy on the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) Board of Directors. The LMC'Board
will consider appointing a new board member to fill an unexpired term at its
January meeting. Manager Rosland said that a list of the current board was
included in the Council packets and if any member of the Council would like to
submit his/her name for appointment, staff would assist in that procedure.
*RESOLUTION ADOPTED DESIGNATING DEPOSITORIES FOR PUBLIC FONDS OF CITY Motion was
madeiby Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the
-following resolution:
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DEPOSITORIES
BE IT RESOLVED that the First Bank National Association, Minneapolis, MN,
Americana State Bank of Edina, Edina, MN, Southwest Fidelity State Bank, Edina,
MN, Marquette Bank Minneapolis, Minneapolis, MN and Norwest Bank MetroWest; Edina,
MN, authorized to do banking business in Minnesota, be and hereby are designated
as Official Depositories for the Public Funds of the City of Edina, County of
Hennepin, Minnesota, until January 1, 1992.
Resolution adopted on rollcall vote, four ayes.
*SIGNATORY RESOLUTION ADOPTED Notion was made by Member Paulus and'was seconded
by Member Rice for adoption of the following resolution:
SIGNATORY RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the persons holding office as Mayor, Manager and Treasurer of
the City of Edina, be, and they hereby are, authorized to act for this
municipality in the transaction,of any banking business with First Bank National
Association, Americana State Bank of Edina, Southwest Fidelity State Bank,
Marquette Bank Minneapolis and Norwest Bank Metrogest (hereinafter referred to as
the "Bank ") from time to time and until written notice to any Bank to the
contrary, to sign checks against said accounts, which checks will be signed by the
Mayor, Manager and City Treasurer. Each Bank is hereby authorized and directed to
honor and pay any checks against such account if signed as above described,
whether or not said check is, payable to the order of, or deposited to the credit
of, any officer or officersiof the City, including the signer or signers of the
check.
Resolution adopted on rollcall vote, four ayes.
*FACSIMILE SIGNATURES RESOLUTION ADOPTED Notion was made by Member Paulus and was
seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLUTION ADOPTED AUTHORIZING USE OF
FACSIMILE SIGNATURES BY PUBLIC OFFICIALS
RESOLVED that the use of facsimile signatures by the following named persons:
FREDERICK S. RICHARDS - MAYOR
RSNNETH E. ROSLAND - CITY MANAGER
JOHN VALLIN - CITY TREASURER
on checks, drafts, warrants, warrant - checks, vouchers or other orders of public
funds deposited in First. Bank National Association, Americana State Bank of Edina,
Southwest Fidelity State Bank, Marquette Bank Minneapolis and Norwest Bank
MetroWest, be and hereby is approved, and that each of said named persons may
authorize said depository banks to honor any.such instrument bearing his facsimile
signature in such form as he may designate and to charge the same to the account
in said depository bank upon which drawn as fully as though it bore his manually
written signature and that instruments so honored shall be wholly operative and
binding in favor of said depository bank although such facsimile signature shall
have been affixed without his authority.
Motion carried on rollcall vote; four ayes.
I- 494/169 LAND ACQUISITION COUNTER OFFER APPROVED Manager Rosland recalled that
at the meeting of December 17, 1990, the Council had authorized staff to make .a
purchase offer of $200,000 for acquisition of the vacant land at the northeast
quadrant of I -494 and Highway 169. The Metropolitan Federal Bank has responded
that they would accept $375,000 with no contingencies, warranties, or liabilities
to'the bank. Staff would recommend that the City counter with an offer of
$290,000. The City's offer was, conditioned upon the seller paying all specials
estimated at $50,000 which is a factor for them.
Member Rice said that he was most concerned about environmental issues. Planner -
Larsen responded that a Stage I environmental, assessment on the property has been
done which concluded that a Stage II assessment is not required. Staff is in the
process of reviewing the assessment and that warranty would not be bargained away.
Member Paulus made a motion that the City make a counter offer of up to $290,000
with the understanding that the seller would pay all special assessments, and that
the Mayor and Manager be authorized to execute the purchase agreement if the offer
is accepted. Motion was seconded by Member Smith.
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Kelly
Motion carried.
(Member Rice left the meeting at this point on the agenda)
HENNEPIN COUNTY REPORT ^IS THE SHARE FAIR" DISCUSSED: RESOLUTION ADOPTED IN
SUPPORT OF COUNTY'S.POSITION ON FISCAL DISPARITIES Manager Rosland referred to a
report from Hennepin County entitled "Is The Share Fair" which speaks to the
Fiscal Disparities Program. He said that under the program a great deal of
commercial /industrial property value in taxes is transferred out of Edina and also
out of Hennepin County which results in higher property taxes to Edina residents.
Because the Hennepin County Board is concerned about the recent growth in the
Fiscal Disparities program, it has taken the position that the size of the tax
base contribution pool should be limited to its 1991 level of $291 Million and has
asked the Council to adopt a resolution supporting the County's legislative
initiative. Manager Rosland recommended that the Council support the County's
position..
Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly noted that the Edina school district also suffers through the
Fiscal Disparities Program. Member Smith said the County's proposal to lower the
target is not the greatest solution and that, personally, he would rather support
doing away with the program. Manager Rosland suggested that could be conveyed in
the cover letter.
Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Fiscal Disparities Program was enacted by the 1971 Legislature and
implemented in 1975,
WHEREAS, the goal of Fiscal Disparities'is to allow all communities in the metro
region to share in the region's growth, regardless of where that growth occurs,
WHEREAS, the growth of the Fiscal Disparities pool is tied directly to the growth
of commercial /industrial property value in the metro area,
WHEREAS, about two- thirds of the pool comes from inflation on properties that have
had no physical development since the program was enacted,
WHEREAS, about 75% of all municipal tax base losses in 1991 were experienced by
cities in Hennepin County,
WHEREAS, approximately $7 million of commercial /industrial property value in taxes
is transferred out of the City of Edina requiring higher property taxes as a
result of Fiscal Disparities,
WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners has endorsed a proposal to
limit the size of the tax base contribution pool to its 1991 level of $291 billion
by adjusting the contribution rate;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that it
hereby supports the position of the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners and
urges the Legislature to consider limiting the size of the tax base contribution
pool as proposed.
Motion for adoption of the resolution.was seconded by Member Paulus.
Charles.Hansing, 4741 Hibiscus Avenue, commented that in Minnesota the property
taxes for commercial property is too high. If the rates for commercial went down
the fiscal disparities would be less and less and would force local governments to
address expenses. Manager Rosland responded that the-City of,Edina has been
leading the cause over the past ten years with regard to the homestead credit,
fiscal disparities and local government aids.
Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly then called for rollcall vote on the motion:
Rollcall:
Ayes: Paulus, Smith, Kelly
Resolution adopted.
*CLAIMS PAID Notion was made by Member Paulus and was seconded by Member Rice for
to approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check
Register dated 01/01/91 and consisting of 17 pages: General Fund $53,818.28,
Communications $32,345.93, Art Center $3,126.50, Capital Fund $3,182.15, Swimming
Pool Fund $4,598.75, Golf Course Fund $87,557.01, Recreation Center Fund $860.41,
Edinborough Park $4,015.83, Utility Fund $235,664.44, Storm Sewer Utility $298.86,
Liquor Dispensary Fund $2,165.48, Construction Fund $1,274.14, TOTAL $425,907.78.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, motion of Member Paulus was
seconded by Mayor Pro -Tem Kelly for adjournment and carried unanimously.
Adjournment at 9:22 p.m.
City Clerk
f MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
JANUARY 22, 1991
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus,, Rice, Smith and Mayor
Richards..
BOY SCOUT TROOP NO. 48'WELCOMED Mayor Richards welcomed members of Boy Scout Troop
No. 48 from Calvary Lutheran Church in Edina. Mike Sebek, Assistant Scoutmaster
said that they were working on merit badges for citizenship in the community and
nation. Member Smith introduced Don Schlaefer, Scoutmaster.
NATIONAL SCHOOL COUNSELING WEER PROCLAIMED Mayor Richards presented the following
proclamation which was unanimously adopted:
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, school counselors are employed in public, private and parochial schools to
..help students reach their full potential as human beings,
WHEREAS, counseling is an essential part of the educational process for students as
they adjust to our very complex society,
WHEREAS, school counselors are concerned with students being better able to
understand themselves, their abilities, strengths and talents as they relate to
career development and awareness,
WHEREAS, school counselors acknowledge the potential and importance of every
student, and believe every student possesses the capability and deserves the right
to learn,
WHEREAS, school counselors endeavor to provide all students with the educational,
psychological and interpersonal skills necessary to enhance their learning
experience,
WHEREAS, school counselors help parents to focus on ways to facilitate the positive
educational, personal and social growth of their children,
NOW THEREFORE, I, Frederick S. Richards as Mayor of the City of Edina, do hereby
proclaim the week of February 3rd as
SCHOOL COUNSELING WEEK IN EDINA
and urge all Edina residents to become more aware of the important role of school
counselors in the education of our students.
Accepting the proclamation was Janet Eian, Executive Director of the Sylvan Learning
Center in Bloomington, along with Mr. Don Seline, Counselor at Valley View Junior
High School, with a brief explanation of how Counselors benefit the youth of Edina.
AMERICAN HISTORY MONTH PROCLAIMED Mayor Richards introduced the following
proclamation which was unanimously adopted:
AN" CAN HISTORY MONTH PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, the National Society Daughters of the American Revolution sponsors February
as American History Month each year; and
WHEREAS, to stimulate a knowledge in both young and old and a 'sense of pride in our
nation's great achievements and dedication to liberty; and
WHEREAS, to stress pride in the United States of America through community services
in educational programs, essay contests and historic tours; and
WHEREAS, through the study of American History, we are made aware of the importance
of Freedom, Equality,,Justice and Humanity in all our lives today; and
WHEREAS, the. importance of remembering American History should be duly noted;
NOW, THEREFORE, I Frederick S. Richards, as Mayor of the City of Edina, do hereby
proclaim the month of February to be
AMERICAN HISTORY MONTH
in the City of Edina and urge all Edina. residents to join with me this month in
recognising the-importance - -of American --History in our lives.,
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED,_ Motion-,was made- by Member Kelly and- was�;seconded by
tI
Member Smith to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented with the
exception of removal of item V.0 - Award of Bid for One Ton Pickup Truck with Snow
Plow Unit.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF 10/15/90, 11/5/90 AND YEAR END MEETING OF 12/27/90
APPROVED Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith to
approve the minutes of the regular meetings of October 15, 1990, and November 5,
1990, and the Year End Meeting of December 27, 1990.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED ON ISSUANCE OF A TEMPORARY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR DR.
JOYCE ANDERSON, 7121 GLOUCHESTER AVENUE. FOR HOME OCCUPATION DENIED '
Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved, and ordered placed on file.
Planner Craig Larsen gave background information regarding the application for a
temporary conditional use permit for home occupation by Dr. Joyce Anderson, 7121
Glouchester Avenue. On November 19, 1990, the Council gave final approval to a
zoning ordinance amendment providing for a conditional use permit for home
occupations by persons that were handicapped. The first application under the new
permit process has been received from Dr. Anderson who initiated the process to have
the ordinance amendment adopted. The application included the required physician's
letter and described generally the scope of her counseling business; i.e. hours and
day of the week of operation and that the total client visits would be limited to 20
per week.
The only variance from the home occupation requirement of the ordinance that is
being requested is the increase of non - resident vehicle trips from 10 per week to
20. The general requirements of Sec. 4, Paragraph D.5 of the Zoning Ordinance
requires that the Council make the following findings before granting a Conditional
Use Permit:
a) will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be
detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals and general
welfare
b) will not cause undue traffic hazards, congestion or parking shortages;
C) will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment, or decrease the value, of
other property in the vicinity, and will not be a nuisance;
d) will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of other
property in the vicinity;
e) will not create an excessive burden on parks, streets and other public
facilities;
f) conforms to the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the district
in which it is located at imposed by this ordinance; and
g) is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
Planner Larsen stated that the application was considered by the Community
Development and Planning Commission at its January 2, 1991, meeting and approval of
the Temporary Conditional Use Permit was recommended, subject to the condition that
client visits be limited to 20 per week.
Member Paulus questioned a sentence in the Planning Commission draft minutes which
stated that the permit runs with the property, not occupant. Planner Larsen said
the minutes were in error and should read that the permit would run,with the
occupancy.
Mayor Richards noted receipt of the following correspondence supporting the request
of Dr. Anderson for a Temporary Conditional Use Permit: Kay and Lee Wicktrom, 7101
Glouchester Dr.; Lucille Williamson, 7129 Glouchester Av.; Alice and Robert Kravig,
7117 Glouchester Av.; and Victoria J. and J.E. Reichardt, 7109 Glouchester-Av: In
opposition to the granting of the Permit, Bus & Pauline Mertes, 7133 Cornelia Dr.;
Joan C. and Paul S. Wehrmeister, 7113 Cornelia Dr.; D. Glen Whitesell, 7116
Heatherton Tr.; Mr. & Mrs. Michael J. Patera, 7120 Glouchester Av.; and an unsigned
letter from a Heatherton Tr. homeowner.
Mayor Richards then called for public comment on the request for a Temporary
Conditional Use Permit. Glen Whitesell, 7116 Heatherton Trail, questioned what a
temporary conditional use permit is compared to a conditional use permit and what
brought about the Council reviews. Planner Larsen explained that in this case the
word temporary means that it runs for the duration, of the condition as long as it is
certified by her doctor, and subject to periodic review by the City Council as
opposed to a conditional use permit that runs with the land. The Ordinance provides
that the permit would be reviewed.on the first anniversary of.the granting of the .
permit, with- reviewal every two years after that.
Byron Richards, 7121 Heatherton Trail, stated that for the record he opposed the
permit.
No further comment being heard, Mayor Richards declared the public hearing closed
and asked for comment and action by the Council.
Mayor Richards asked the applicant, Dr. Anderson if she maintained an office outside
of her home. Dr. Anderson replied she has a timeshare office, at Centennial Lakes
Office Building which she uses approximately two hours per week for any patients in
wheelchairs.
In response to questions of Member Smith, Planner Larsen stated that hours could be
imposed as a condition of the permit. There would be a periodic review of the
permit to see if the conditions were being adhered to and if complaints were
received in the interim they would be investigated. If violations were apparent, it
would be handled as any other ordinance and would be subject to hearing and possible
revocation of the permit. The requested 20 client trips per week would mean 20
automobile trips per week would be allowed.
Member Rice asked if this would mean no overlapping of appointments. Planner Larsen
said the permit would allow that to happen provided that the overall client trips in
a given week did not exceed 20, and provided the other performance standards were
met, e.g. vehicles must be accommodated in the driveway. Member Rice recalled that
Dr. Anderson had agreed to that policy if the permit were granted. Planner Larsen
stated that was his recollection also. No relief from that requirement is being
requested.
Regarding the imposition of hours, Member Paulus noted that the application does not
state hours or days of operation. Because this is a residential neighborhood she
said she would like to see the hours stated so as to make the least amount of impact
on the neighborhood. Member Smith suggested that the hours for the home occupation
be restricted from 9:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M., Monday through Friday.
Mayor Richards commented that he could find no valid reason to support the Planning
Commission's recommendation to issue a Temporary Conditional Use Permit. While we
struggle to maintain the single family residential neighborhoods the other side of
the coin is to enable everyone,to function in a productive manner. He said that the
facts do not support an exception in this case and that he has not been persuaded
that Dr. Anderson cannot otherwise function in a normal productive life. Further,
Dr. Anderson has not shown that the standards and criteria of Sec. 4, D.S, will be
met. Mayor Richards said that he supported the ordinance that would allow a person
to conduct a business or profession out of the home-in certain situations but that
he -could not support this application, for -the:., reasons, stated..
Member Rice: commented. - ::that he felt.- -the :questions- relative7. to- traffic- and.:_
neighborhood safety have been addressed by the ordinance and that he would support
issuance of a Temporary Conditional Use Permit, with no restrictions as to hours.
Member Kelly made a motion to grant a Temporary Conditional Use Permit to Dr. Joyce
Anderson, 7121 Glouchester Avenue, subject to the condition that client visits be
limited to 20 per week. Motion was seconded by Member Rice.
Member Smith moved that the motion be amended to add the following restrictions:
that the days of operation be Monday through Friday from 9:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M. and
client visits be limited to one hour with no overlapping appointments. Motion to
amend was seconded by Member Paulus.
Further comments were made by the Council Members.and additional testimony was given
by Harold.Bagley, 7114 Glouchester, Dr. Joyce Anderson in support of her application
to grant a Temporary Conditional Use Permit, and by Dr. Michael Glavan, 7124
Glouchester, in objection.
Mayor Richards then called for a rollcall vote on the amendment to the main motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Paulus, Smith
Nays: Kelly, Rice, Richards
Motion failed.
Mayor Richards then called for a rollcall vote on the main motion on the floor.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Rice, Kelly
Nays: Paulus, Smith, Richards
Motion failed.
Member Rice made a motion to grant a Temporary Conditional Use Permit to Dr. Joyce
Anderson at 7121 Glouchester Avenue, subject to the following conditions: 1),that
client visits be limited to 20 per week, 2) Hours restricted to 7:00 A.M. - 7:00
P.M., Monday through Saturday, and 3) No overlapping visits or street parking by
clients. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:,
Ayes: Rice, Kelly
Nays: Paulus, Smith, Richards
Motion failed.
Member Kelly asked that the - Temporary Conditional Use Permit Ordinance.be placed on
the Council Agenda for the meeting of February 4, 1991, for further discussion.
Dr. Anderson asked if she could continue seeing clients at her home until the
meeting of February 4, 1991. Planner Larsen explained that up to 10 automobile
trips per week is allowed under the Zoning Ordinance, regardless of any amendment.
PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED ON CONDITIONAL USE PE MCET FOR HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY
BUILDING EXPANSION: HEARING CONTINUED TO FEBRUARY 19, 1991 Affidavits of Notice
were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen explained that
the Hennepin County Regional Library, located at 7001 York Avenue South, has applied
for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for expansion of the public library portion of
the building.
Presentation by Planner
Presently, the library totals approximately 97,000 square feet, which includes the
library, the court system and the Hennepin County service center. The existing
library itself is 67,964 square feet and the courts /service center is 284882 square
feet. The Conditional UseiPermit would allow the library portion to expand-by
15,246 square feet. The addition would occur.by pushing out the existing westerly
steps =of- the building and by- filling in -a notch in the- northeast corner." The facade
of the library, following expansion, would basically appear the same as today.
Parking for the library is computed on 10 spaces plus 1 space for each 300 square
feet of gross.floor area. Parking for the courts and service center would be
computed as for any other government service, 5 spaces per 1000 square feet or 1 for
200. Total existing parking spaces are 425; total required with the expanded space
for the library would be 430 spaces. Parking as proposed by this plan 'would provide
a total of 502 spaces which would be constructed by pushing the present parking
area, located north of the York Avenue access would provide a 10 foot setback, where
the Zoning. Ordinance would require a 20 foot parking.setback. Accordingly, a 10'
foot parking setback variance is requested. All other aspects of the'site
development and expansion would conform to Zoning Ordinance requirements.
As a normal- policy, green space would not be used for additional parking. However,
after deliberation with the County, evaluating the ordinance, and in anticipating
the multi -use character of this facility, staff felt that possibly code requirements
were lower than they should be, The library remains convinced that this parking is
necessary; that it is needed immediately during the expansion project and ultimately
for the enlarged facility.
The, Community Development and Planning Commission considered the Conditional Use
Permit request at its meeting of January 2, 1991, and recommended approval including
the requested 10 foot parking setback variance from York Avenue. Reasons stated bye
the Planning Commission were: 1) that it was important that the public perceive this
as an accessible use with convenient and adequate parking, 2) that the multi -use
demand was not anticipated by the Zoning Ordinance, and 3) that there would be no
significant impact to vehicle drivers on York Avenue as additional screening would
be added along the westerly side of the parking area.
Council Comment
Member Smith said he did not feel that there would be adequate space for additional
landscaping if the variance were granted. He also asked if the library had
considered a parking ramp. Planner Larsen said that additional parking could be
done more economically on the property as opposed to construction of a ramp. Also,
without a variance, ramps are prohibited in this zoning district.
Mayor Richards asked if the City could impose a- specific landscaping plan as a
condition to granting the Conditional Use Permit. Planner Larsen responded that
this could be done. I
Member Rice commented that it is a lot harder topput land back into green space than
to take it out. Although he would be in favor of granting the setback variance, he
said he would not be in favor of allowing the library to construct the additional 33
parking spaces along York Avenue until a pressing need is demonstrated.
Member Paulus said she was concerned that green space would be taken away, based on
library staff observation that additional parking was needed and not on data had
been collected. Further, that City staff had not conducted any parking counts to
substantiate the need. Planner Larsen explained that intergovernmental professional
courtesy was exercised on this. City staff did look at two things relative.to the
additional 33 spaces: 1) a proof of parking.could be required that would allow the
County to add those spaces if there was a demonstrated need in the future, or 2)
eliminate the 33 spaces and allow the County to apply for a variance to install
those spaces if there was a demonstrated need in the future. Nan Faust, member of
the Planning Commission, stated that the commission had asked county staff to
consider reviewing their return.book system so that parking spaces would not be used
to only return books.
Considerable discussion followed concernin&;,proof: of:: the: need for additional-
parking, potential loss of green space if the setback variance were granted, and a
returned books drop -off area. Raymond Johnson, Project Manager for the Hennepin
County Library expansion project, commented that he understood the Council's
concerns about the existing green space. He also said that the comments heard_at
the Planning Commission meeting have been taken under advisement but were not
included nor added to the scope of the project.
Mr. Johnson said he felt that the Hennepin County Library Board would be responsive
to the concerns of the Council but that he could not make any promises.
Member Richards made a motion to continue the hearing to February 19, 1991, on the
request for a Conditional Use Permit for the Hennepin County Library at 7001 York
Avenue for building expansion so that City staff could work with the Library staff
relative to designing a returned book drop -off area and revising the site plan to
eliminate the need for a parking setback variance. Motion was seconded by Member
Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly,. Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARING PRELIIIINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR FARRELLS PARKWOOD KNOLLS - TRACT A.
R.L.S. 1286 - 5700 BLASE ROAD GRANTED Affidavits of Notice were presented,
approved, and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen explained that on December 3,
1990, the Council heard but took no action on the subject subdivision. The
proponents have since presented a modified three lot proposal on which they are, by
letter dated January 11, 1991, requesting Council action. As modified, the
preliminary plat, would require one variance, that being a four foot lot width
variance for Lot one. Lot 3, which previously required a lot width variance, now
complies with the neighborhood median lot width of 130 feet. The additional lot
width came at the expense of rear yard area for Lot 2.
Presentation by Proponent
Linda Farrell, 5700 Blake Road, stated that they hoped their letter of January 11,
1991, clarified some of the issues that had been discussed at previous meetings and
has addressed the concerns raised by the Council. The plan being presented
represents a culmination of the ideas, issues and concerns of the Council, Planning
Commission and the City Planner, is an appropriate use of their land does not
negatively impact the neighborhood and meets the intent of the Zoning Ordinance.
Mrs. Farrell commented, although change can be disconcerting, i.e. development of
Bredesen Park, traffic signals on Vernon Avenue, regrading of Blake Road and adding
sidewalks,.that with thoughtful planning each development has enhanced their
neighborhood and Edina. Because they plan to live in the subdivision, they would
hardly want to create a plan that would negatively impact them or their neighbors.
Reference was made to two drawing that were submitted with the Farrell's letter.
The first incorporated the minor changes in lot.line placement that the Council
suggested. Lots 2 and 3 require no variances; Lot 1 requires a four foot lot width
variance. The second drawing showed sample house pad sketches as required by the
ordinance.. The house pad on Lot 2 has a 125 foot setback from South Knoll Drive
which corresponds -to the setback of the Wurst house to the west. Mrs. Farrell said
they agreed with the Council that restricting a home on Lot 2 to one level would
protect.the integrity of the neighborhood.
Lot 3 shows the 130 foot lot width suggested-by the Council and includes the 100
foot conservation easement along the pond. The preliminary plat drawing also lists
the trees in the .proposed building site areas. Lot 1 is four feet narrower in width
than the- "neighborhood median ", but does represent the "neighborhood average" lot
width which is 126 feet. The four foot proposed variance represents only a 3%
variance from the median on the Lot 1 width. The large size of the proposed new
lots- should:. be., given- strong consideration:
Mrs. Farrell concluded by commenting that approval of their proposed three lot
subdivision would not set a precedent or be construed as an example for future
subdivisions in Edina. The large lot sizes,.the unique topography and forestation,
and the minimal variance percentage requested would make the subdivision both
feasible and applicable to their property only. °
Public Comment
Thomas Wurst, 6205 South Knoll Dride,.referred to the Farrell's letter dated January
11, 1991, and the drawing of the proposed subdivision and-made comments summarized
as follows:
1) He had not contributed any ideas to the Farrell's, proposed plat.
2) Originally, he had agreed with a two lot subdivision (the lot for the existing
residence and a lot similar to what•is now Lot 3). The Planning Commission denied a
three lot subdivision, and approved a two lot subdivision. 3) The proposed house
pad for Lot 2 is for illustrative purposes only and is not binding. One of his
prime concerns was the forestation and there are now two new driveways proposed off
of South Knoll Drive for Lots 1 and 2. 1
4) Although the 500 foot neighborhood, as defined by ordinance, consists of 45
residential lots, they are embraced in four different plats. Only one of those
plats is to the west of Blake Road, which is contiguous to. proposed Lot 2 and Lot 3.
The.lots to the east were platted to be in harmony with everything east of Blake
Road. The lots west of Blake Road were platted to be in harmony with the Parkwood
Knolls plat. Of the 45 lots, 60% or 27 do not meet ordinance requirements.
However, only 8 of the,27 lots do not conform are in Parkwood Knolls. In summary,
Mr. Wurst said that a three lot subdivision would not be 'in harmony with the rest of
the area and would not constitute good planning.
Bentley Smith, 6212 South Knoll Drive, stated that on South Knoll Drive west from
Blake Road to just beyond View Lane had been polled and that, excluding the
Farrells, all but one were opposed to the subdivision.
Mayor Richards commented that letters had been received from Paul Joas, and from
Carol S.'Mahony both iii opposition to this subdivision.
Roger Post, 6204 South Knoll Drive, said this was the first time he had seen the
plans for the proposed subdivision. If this is approved, his house would be just
across from the proposed driveway for the existing house. He now looks out upon
trees and a reasonably decent sight across the street. However, he recognized that
the Farrells own the subject property and have the right to express their opinion
and are trying to do so. It come down to a minor four foot variance,.the greatest
impact will be on the Wursts, if the trees and shrubs are maintained. If the
integrity and solidarity of the area are maintained, Mr. Post said he would not be
against the subdivision.
James Van Valkenberg, Attorney representing the Farrells, commented that the lot
calculations for the 500 foot neighborhood are shown on the plat survey, including
the lots laying east of Blake Road as well as those laying West of Blake Road. He
reiterated that the proposed lots are substantial in size, and urged the Council to
favorably consider the subdivision, with the four foot lot width variance for Lot 1.
Council Comment e
Mayor Richards asked Planner Larsen to review the proposal now before the Council
for action and the recommendation of the Planning Commission. Planner Larsen
explained that the three lot subdivision now presented has been modified from that
which the Council considered on December 3, 19.90. Two actions were taken by the
Community Development and Planning Commission. On August 29, 1990, the Planning
Commission voted unanimously to approve a revised two lot subdivision. On September
26; 1990, the -Planning-, Commission- voted to- recommend..-denial., of. a revised - -three lot
plat..
In response to questions from Member Kelly, Planner Larsen clarified that the three
lot subdivision the Planning Commission had seen had a four foot lot variance for
Lot 1 and a 22 foot lot width variance on Lot 3. The proposed house-on Lot 3 would
have to meet the setback of the house to the south to meet the ordinance
requirement, the ordinance does not prevent a house from being set back further.
Engineer Hoffman responded that.no footage was taken from the Farrell property for
Blake Road widening project as there was sufficient right of way.
Member Rice questioned what is considered a one -story home, in terms of height in
feet, if building height restrictions could be imposed on Lot 2, and what the
wording "illustrative purposes only" meant regarding the sample house pad sketches.
Planner Larsen responded that, typically, at the front it would be eight to ten feet
from ground level to the eave line, and depending on the pitch of the roof, the
total height could be from fifteen to twenty -five feet. Conditions could be imposed
and enforced through a developer's agreement. The term "illustrative purposes only"
indicated a footprint that would conform but that no actual house plan had been
developed for the property. That would be decided in the future when a building
permit is requested. '
Attorney Erickson observed that the ordinance states that when a variance is
granted, conditions can be imposed to assure compliance and to protect adjacent
properties. The building pad as illustrated would be allowed without setback
variances and would be controlled only by the building code. If a house was
proposed varying from that footprint that would require setback variances, it could
not be built without the granting of variances from the City. If a variance is
granted now, conditions can be imposed to protect adjacent properties through a
development agreement or through the variance document itself.. If the condition
being imposed is.that the building is one story, however defined, that could be done
under the ordinance and by statute at this stage as opposed to subsequently at the
building permit stage. ,
Considerable discussion followed on°these issues: 1) a two lot subdivision versus a'
three lot subdivision, 2) whether a hardship exists that would justify a 4 foot lot
width variance for Lot 1, 3) whether to impose a condition that the home to be built
on Lot 2 shall be one - story, 4) proposed placement of the house on Lot 3, 5) the
discussion at the Planning Commission hearings which resulted in the recommendation
for denial of a three lot subdivision requiring lot width variances for Lot 1 and
Lot 3, and 6) if the revised plat now under consideration should be sent back to the
Planning Commission. Planner Larsen reminded the Council that the 120 day
requirement for Council action had earlier been waived by the proponents but that
they were not requesting action on the preliminary plat.
Member Rice introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption subject to
execution of a developer's agreement at final plat . approval requiring that any house
to be built on Lot 2 be limited to 18' in height from ground level to roof peak:
RESOLUTION GRANTING PRHLTMaiARY PLAT APPROVAL
FOR FARRELLS PARKUOOD KNOLLS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled, "FARREL S PARKWOOD KNOLLS ", platted by James M. Farrell and
Linda Farrell, husband and wife, and presented at the regular meeting of the City
Council of January 22, 1991, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Smith.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Rice,,Smith
Nays: Paulus, Richards
Resolution.adopted.
SEVER.- BACKUP CI.4IM.:OUR.ICHARD MILLER. 5340• HOLLYii00W RD.. DISCUSSED Manager Rosland
recalled that the sever backup claim of Richard Miller, 5340 Hollywood Rdi -was
discussed at the January 7, 1991, meeting and was continued to allow staff to review
the incident and procedures taken and to discuss it further with the insurance
company. After meeting with the insurance company, they affirmed that no liability
was found and the claim was turned down. Subsequently, Engineer Hoffman has talked
to Mr. Miller and made a minor offer in an attempt to resolve the claim.
Richard Miller, 5340 Hollywood Rd.; said as a customer he was addressing the Council
as the manager's of the municipal utility in addition to being elected officials.
He stated that their home was hooked up to City water and sewer in 1981. On
December 8, 1990, they discovered sewage coming, geyser like, out of the toilet in
the lower level bathroom. After calling 911, a City crew was on site within 10 -15
minutes. They found a blockage in the main sewer just north of his home, which they
felt floated down from Oxford Avenue, and upon attempting to remove the blockage
were unsuccessful. Because of the action of the City crew, the house was nearly
uninhabitable. Except for emergency action of a private contractor who was able to
get on site within an hour, the house would have been nearly destroyed. Plaster
walls, woodwork and new carpeting had to be removed and it took he entire holiday
season to restore the house.
Mr. Miller said the damages were well documented and the City's insurance adjustor,
who visited the site, was satisfied that the. work that was being done was necessary.
However, the insurance company arbitrarily and capriciously turned the claim down
for the reason that the City could not be responsible for what was put in the sewer.
He said he was not concerned about what was found in the sewer he was concerned
about what the City crew undertook to do that was unsuccessful and by their action
caused the damage to his home. Mr. Miller concluded by asking that the Council give
consideration to his claim so that it would not have to litigated.
Manager Rosland commented that the normal procedure on claims is to refer them to
the insurance, company who makes the decision on .whether the claims are allowed. No
formal action was taken by the Council.
*BID AWARDED FOR ONE 1991 UNMARRED MID -SIZE POLICE VEHICLE Notion was made by
Member Kelly and was seconded by.Member Smith for award of bid for one 1991 unmarked
Police vehicle to Grossman Chevrolet, Burnsville, NN, per Hennepin County
Cooperative Purchasing Contract #1549DO, at $11,492.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes
*BID AWARDED FOR SIX (6) 1991 FULL -SIZE POLICE PURSUIT VEHICLES Notion vas made by
Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for six full -size
police pursuit vehicles, to Rathert Chevrolet, Duluth, NN, per State of Minnesota
Purchasing Cooperative, at $77.376.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
BID AWARDED FOR ONE TON PICK -UP TRUCK WITH SNOW PLOW UNIT Member Paulus asked if
this pick -up truck would solely be used at Edinborough Park and Centennial Lakes or
would it be, available for use at other locations. Manager Rosland said the pick -up
would mainly be used at Edinborough and Centennial Lakes on a daily basis, but would
be available for use at other locations. Notion was made by Member Kelly for award
of bid fora one ton pick -up truck with snow plow unit to Viking Chevrolet, Inc,
Fridley, MR, per Hennepin Contract #1678A0 at $16,114.90. Motion was seconded by
Member Rice.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith Richards
Motion carried.
*BID AWARDED,- FOR�TWO 1/2 TON-PICK--UP TRUCKS ,Notion was,made by Member-: Kelly and was
seconded- by -- Member- =Smith -. for -award -of . bid. - for -two•:1 /2-.ton.-pick -up ;trucks to Thomas
Pontiac & G.M.C., Inc., per-Hennepin County Contract at 021.A76.00—
Mot ion-.- carried.-- on rollcall _.,vote . five- ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR RANGE GOLF BALLS WITH BRAEKAR LOGO Motion was made by Member Relly
and was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for 2500 dozen range golf-balls
with the Braemar logo to recommended low- bidder, Spalding, at $13,750.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR CARPETING AT BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE Motion was made by Member Kelly and
was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for carpeting at Braemar Clubhouse to
recommended low- bidder, Anderson's New Carpeting Design, at $18,130.25.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*ORDINANCE NO. 171 -A36 (TO INCREASE CERTAIN FEES) ADOPTED: SECOND READING WAIVED
Member Kelly made a motion to adopt Ordinance No. 171 -A36 To 'Increase Fees as
follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 171 -A36
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 171
TO INCREASE CERTAIN FEES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. The following described fee numbers of Schedule A to Ordinance No.
171 are amended to read as follows:
ORD. SEC. PURPOSE.OF
NO. NO. FEE OR CHARGE AMOUNT FEE NO.
432 -A1 5 Plumbing permit To install and inspect RPZ 14t -1
backflow preventer $25.00
Re- inspection of RPZ
backflow preventer 25.00
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its
passage and publication.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Smith
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
MINUTES OF TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE OF 1/15191 APPROVED Engineer Hoffman explained
that for item (1) of Section A, the Traffic Safety Committee had received a request
from Robert Shadduck of Jerry's Enterprises, 5101 Vernon Avenue South, to install a
"stop" sign at the exit lane from the top level at Jerry's Parking Ramp to control
access points. The Committee recommended "Yield" signs instead.
For item (2) Section A, Engineer,Hoffman recalled that at the October 9, 1990,
Traffic Safety meeting, the west side of France Avenue between West 51st Street and
the north drive of Americana Bank was designated a MTC bus layover area•for the
hours-9:00 A.M. and after 8:00 P.M. weekdays and on Saturdays and Sundays for a
three month period. At the January 15, 1991, Traffic Safety meeting, the issue was
reviewed and the Committee recommended to permanently designate the area for MTC bus.
layover. It was the consensus of the Council to delete the term 'permanently' from
the recommendation.
Member Kelly made a motion to approve the recommended action listed in Section A of
the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of January 15, 1991:
1) To install a "YIELD" -sign near the end of the top level ramp exit with
instructions to observe - traffic to the left - and - right, and re- evaluate this
item In April,
2) To designate the west side of- France Avenue between West:- 51st. Street: and the
north drive of Americana Bank as an NTC layover zone before 9:00 AN and after
8:00 PM weekdays, and on Saturdays and Sundays,
and to acknowledge Sections B and C of the Minutes.
Motion was seconded by Member Rice.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT UPDATE GIVEN Assistant Manager Gordon Hughes gave
an update on the Tax Increment Financing Districts that were established on April 2,
1990, at-44th & France, Valley View Road & Wooddale Avenue and 70th Street & Cahill
Road as follows.
ACTIONS TAKEN FROM APRIL 2. 1990
May 7, 1990 -- Council directed staff to retain the services of J. Peter Meyers to
facilitate ongoing discussions with property owners in the Districts to ascertain
interest of property owners in pursuing development and redevelopment activities.
July 12, 1990 - The City entered into a development agreement with REC, Inc.,
concerning the redevelopment of the Cahill School property, that would include the
demolition of Cahill Elementary School, construction of streets and utilities,
dedication of a conservation easement, removal of underground fuel tanks,
subdivision deduction and the provision of a memorial monument at the corner of 70th
Street & Cahill Road. The agreement implemented the decisions reached by the
Council relative to the Cahill School rezoning and subdivision. With the exception
of the monument, no financial contribution was made to this project by virtue of the
development agreement.
September 4, 1990 - After conversations with property owners, J. Peter Meyers
reported there was little interest on the part,of property owners to pursue
development proposals, except for Ed Atcas, owner of the Southwest Clinic Building.
Council consensus was that nothing further should be pursued in the districts except
for meeting with Mr. Atcas.
After'September 4, 1990 - City staff had several conversations with Mr. Atcas
concerning the expansion of the Southwest Clinic building in conjunction with the
possible acquisition of the potential sale of the Roster Service Station.
Conversations with Mr. Roster concerning the sale of the service station were also
held. At last conversation with Mr. Atcas, he was reluctant to pursue an expansion
due to financial feasibility.
LEGAL ISSUES AFFECTING THE DISTRICTS
January 7, 1991 Council-Meeting - The Districts are affected by certain provisions
of the tax increment financing law adopted by the legislature at its last session.
At least one of the following actions must be taken prior to June 1, 1991:
1) a development agreement must be entered into by the City for a site in the
district
2) bonds must be issued to finance project costs, or
3) the City must acquire property in the district
Unless one of these three actions occurs, with regard to a particular District by
June 1, 1991, that district will no longer qualify as a tax increment financing
district. Failure to satisfy,the requirement by one district will not affect the
remaining two districts.
The development,agreement relative to the Cahill School 'redevelopment project, meets
the legal criteria. Therefore the 70th & Cahill District is in compliance and will
continue to exist after June 1, 1991. No actions have been taken at,44th & France
or at Valley View and Wooddale. Therefore, these Districts are subject to potential
decertification on June 1, 1991.
FINANCIAL. ISSUES
The= Districts- together_comprise:.one "development.:district ". Increments.- .received
from all.- _three:Districts may.--be-pooled and directed -to.a- project in one- ioftthe
Districts— Evew if one or-two of the Districts..were decertified as described above,
those areas nevertheless remain within the development district.
The 44th & France District was qualified as a redevelopment district,, whereas the
Valley View/Wooddale and the 70th & Cahill Road Districts were qualified as economic
development districts. There are two critical differences between redevelopment,
districts and economic development districts. These differences relate to the base,
i.e. "frozen value ", of the District and the duration of the District. In
redevelopment districts, the base value of the District is frozen and remains
unchanged for'the life of the District, which is 20 years. Therefore, for the
entire duration of the District, the City would capture increments attributable to
inflation and /or new construction. In economic development districts, however, the
base value of the District increases each year at the annual rate of inflation for
the five years prior to establishment of the District. In addition, economic
development districts enjoy a duration of only 8 -10 years depending upon the date of
the receipt of the first tax increments. In the case of the 70th & Cahill District,
the base value will increase at a rate of approximately 5% a year. In the case of
the Wooddale & Valley View District, the base value will increase at a rate of
approximately 4 1/4% a year.
For taxes payable in 1991, increase in property values at 70th & Cahill and Valley
View & Wooddale, did not match the increase in base value. Therefore, no tax
increments will be generated at 70th & Cahill or Valley View,& Wooddale for 1991.
At 44th & France, increments of approximately $8,000 are expected for 1991. The
redevelopment of the Cahill School site will likely result in positive increments
being generated in future years. However, this will depend largely on the
development schedule of this project which could be seriously affected by economic
conditions. Based on the above issues, and the present uncertainty of the economy,
staff cannot assure the Council that sufficient increments will be generated to
finance public cost without the prospect of an accompanying new development.
SUMMARY AND FUTURE ACTIONS
In order to preserve the 44th & France and Valley View & Wooddale Districts, steps
must be taken in the very. near future to comply with statutory requirements. Even
if either or both of these districts fail to meet the criteria and are decertified
on June 1, 1991, increments from the 70th & Cahill District could be used to .finance
public improvements within the 44th & France and Valley View & Wooddale areas.
However, tax increments are not now being generated at 70th & Cahill and the
prospect of future increments depends largely on the development schedule of the
project. The 44th & France District may have the greatest potential for increments
in the future, in that this District is not affected by a continually. inflating base
value and is of a 20 year duration. However, at the present time little interest
has been expressed at 44th & France in pursuing private projects that would generate
future increment. If the City wishes to proceed with property acquisition in any of
these Districts, it should do so with the understanding that increments may not
exist in the future to repay the City's acquisition costs.
In response to questions from Member Smith, Assistant Manager Hughes commented that
if the City chose to acquire some property for redevelopment, namely the service
station at Valley View & Wooddale, the City could do that if funding could be found.
The assessor's estimated market value of the subject property is less than $100,000,
but acquisition costs would likely be greater than that. The City would also be
subject to relocation benefits.
Member Smith also asked if the City could acquire property, rehabilitate it and then
sell it back to the previous owner. Assistant Manager Hughes replied that,
typically the City can spend tax increment money on public projects, i.e. acquiring
property and demolishing what is there. It is difficult to go the next..step and
actually construct with public money. The,City- could ..lend,money to a private
-individual..to do rehabilitation work on -_.a building,_. Member Smith.observed..that of
the'-thiee areas; Wooddale & Valley View was of some concern and the issue may be
whether the Council should be pro- active to address that concern.
Member Kelly.asked if the City could add to the north and /or south boundaries of the
44th & France District. Assistant Manager Hughes said it would be very difficult
under the new law to expand the district. He reported that on January 18, 1991, he
had received a call from�a business owner in the district, Mr. Durr, who expressed _
an interest in expanding his retail business by acquiring a second home to the we'st.
Mr. Durr had asked if the City or the HRA would participate.financially.
Member Rice,commented that the City had created these districts in a timely fashion
and had sent out staff and a consultant to see what could be done. However, with
little interest shown by the property owners, there is no reason to do anything
except to let the districts expire.
Mayor Richards advised that, if the Council wished to be pro- active, action would
have to be taken prior to June 1, 1991.
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL PLAN FOR SEWER AND WATER_ PRESENTED: 1991 PROJECTS APPROVED
Engineer Hoffman presented the Five Year Capital Plan for Water and Sanitary Sewer
Systems of the City. Line items were explained and discussed and 1991 projects were
identified. Member Kelly's motion was seconded by Member Rice to approve the
recommended "Five Year Capital Plan for Sever and Water" and the 1991 Projects, as
identified.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
I- 494/169 LAND ACQUISITION ATTEMPTS TO CONTINUE Planner Larsen reported on the
continuing attempt to acquire property in the northeast quadrant of Highways 169 and
494. The City's offer of $290,000 has been rejected by officials of Metropolitan
Federal Bank. They have countered with an offer of $360,000. It is staff's belief
that with an.offer of $340,000 a deal can be made. The Bank has been asked to
identify specific representations and warranties contained in the purchase
agreement, which they find unacceptable. A response is expected soon.
In reviewing state statutes and agency regulations to determine what permits are
needed to use the property as planned, i.e. composting, temporary,storage, and
recycling of road materials, it appears the City will need,only to give the
Pollution Control Agency written notice of our activities.
The Bank has provided Phase I environmental review for the property. City Attorneys
are presently reviewing this report, which will likely be adequate if we'receive
acceptable warranties from the seller. If not, some further environmental work may
be required.
Planner Larsen asked for the City's offer of $340,000, subject to satisfactory
resolution of the environmental and permit issues.
Following discussion, Member Rice made a motion to continue the negotiations to
acquire the subject property for the previous offering price authorized by the
Council of $290,000. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
PROPOSED EMMITURE OF FORFEITED MONIES APPROVED Police Chief Swanson explained
that forfeiture money has been accumulated over the last several years to a sum of
over $40,000.- Guidelines for its expenditure -.are quite specific - asset out-in The
Attorney General's Guidelines for Seized •and- ,Forfeited-.Property,.July 1990; -and
Minnesota Statute Criminal Code 609.5315. Chief Swanson -then -presented.�:the.�r
Expenditure of Forfeited Monies plan as outlined in his memorandum of January 17;
1991, totalling, $39,019.00.
Member Smith expressed concern about purchasing items that would have a future
budget obligation for continued use, i.e. air time on cellular telephones for squad
cars. Member Smith commented he would prefer using monies collected from drug
seizure for drug prevention. Chief Swanson stated the D.A.R.E. program is a
prevention program, and is geared for the drug.education from 5th grade, 10 year old
level.
In response to questions from Member Paulus, Chief Swanson said the primary reason
for acquiring cellular telephones would be for telephone reporting. On 911 calls,
residents could be given a choice whether they want an officer to-come or could a
zone officer call, them to discuss .their concerns. Besides being more cost
effective, zone officers can better keep in touch with the community. Cellular air
time is purchased under a Hennepin County bid, making it much more cost effective.
Member Kelly made a motion to approve the expenditure of forfeiture monies as
presented and as recommended by Chief Swanson. Motion was seconded by Member Rice.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards
Nays: Smith
Motion carried.
ABSENTEE POLICY ESTABLISHED FOR ADVISORY BOARDS /COMMISSIONS /COMMITTEES Manager
Rosland informed the Council that the present advisory board policy consists of
automatic removal if any board member misses four meetings in one year or three
consecutive meetings. From time to time, there may be unusual circumstances that
could create a hardship on a board member to attend a meeting. Manager Rosland said
he would recommend the policy:
An advisory board member who has missed three consecutive meetings or know
that he /she will miss these three consecutive meetings can address a letter to
the board.chair stating the circumstances. The chair of the board will then,
if he /she agrees, forward the letter to the Mayor. With the Mayor's approval
and also the consent of the City Council, the advisory board member will be
excused and allowed to continue to serve.
Member Kelly made a motion that the absentee policy for advisory
boards /commissions /committees be adopted as presented. Motion was seconded by
Member Smith.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Richards
Nays: Paulus, Rice
Motion carried.
RICHARD MILLER NOMINATED FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BOARD Mayor Richards advised that the terms of Richard Miller and Thomas Maple, Jr.
on the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Board will expire March 8, 1991. Two
additional residents have expressed an interest in serving on this Board. Mr.
Miller said he had served on the board for three terms and has applied for
reappointment. He spoke of his background and interest.in continuing to serve and
asked for the Council's support.
Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved adoption:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the term of Richard Miller on the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Board
will end on March 8, 1991, and
WHEREAS, Richard Miller has fairly represented the interests of the City of Edina
and its residents- living adjacent to Minnehaha Creek:
BE IT RESOLVED ., -by =the City Council of Edina,. Minnesota-,- that: it hereby- recommends
and -- nominates.Richard Miller.to the: Hennspin- County Board -of Commissioners4or re-
appointme=-- to�:the :Minnehaha Creek Watershed District- Board.
ADOPTED this 22nd day of January, 1991.
Motion was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes:,Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Resolution adopted.
APPOINTMENTS TO ADVISORY BOARDS /COMMISSIONS /COMMITTEES DISCUSSED Mayor Richards
referred to. information included in Council packets on Advisory Boards and
Commission members whose terms of office expire on February 1, 1991. Vacancies, due
either to resignations or ineligibility because of the limitation of terms by State
Statute, were also noted. Mayor Richards asked Council members to respond with
names of residents with an interest in serving on these Boards and Commissions to
him by February 1, 1991.
Mayor Richards stated letters would be sent to Board and Commission members with
absences beyond the allowed limit.
*RESOLUTION FOR HENNEPIN COUNTY RECYCLING FUNDING APPROVED Mayor Richards said that
Hennepin County now requires each City Council to submit a resolution approving
submittal of the 1991 Recycling Grant Application.
Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved adoption.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Pursuant to Minnesota Statute 115A.551, by December 31, 1993, each county
in the metropolitan area will have as a goal to recycle a minimum of 35 percent
(35 %) by.veight of total solid waste generation, and each county must develop and
implement or require political subdivisions within the county to develop and
implement programs, practices, or methods designed to meet its.recycling goal; and
WHEREAS, Pursuant to Minesota Statute 115A.552, counties shall ensure that
residents have an opportunity to recycle; and
WHEREAS, Hennepin County Ordinance 13 requires each city to implement a recycling
program to enable the County to meet its recycling goals -; and
WHEREAS, the County has adopted a Hennepin County Funding Assistance Policy for
Source Separated Recyclables on September 11, 1990, to distribute funds to cities
for the development and implementation of waste reduction and recycling programs;
and
WHEREAS, to be eligible to receive these County funds, cities must meet the
conditions set forth in the "funding policy;" and
WHEREAS, the City of Edina desires to receive these County funds;
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council authorizes, the submittal of
the 1991-Hennepin County Grant application for Municipal Source Separated
Recyclables;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that as a condition•to receive fiords under the Hennepin
County Finding Assistance Policy, the City agrees to implement a waste reduction and
recycling program as committed to by its submission of the 1991 Hennepin County
Recycling Grant Application and that the City will use such County funds only for
the limited purpose of implementing the city's waste reduction and recycling
program.
ADOPTED THIS 23rd day of January, 1991.
Resolution adopted on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*PETITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SIDEWALKS REFERRED TO ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. Notion
of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Smith to refer the following petitions for
sidewalk construction and pedestrian crossing to the Engineering Department for
processing:
1) Sidewalk - East side of Wooddale Avenue between Wooddale Lane and West:56th
Street.
2) Sidewalk.- West side of Cornelia Drive between-West 71st - .Street and:..West 72nd
Street; North side of. West. 72nd. Street.- between Cornelia. Drive- ,and._OaklawneAvenue-
3) Pedestrian. Crossing and Sidewalk - Pedestrian-- CrossingA,to...and.,froa. the- =East side.
of_ France.. Avenue at the. -. intersections of . West 66th_ Street/France�jAveuue; Sidewalk-
East of France Avenue on the North side of hest 66th Street.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED ASKING REGIONAL TRANSIT BOARD TO RECONSIDER FUNDING FOR DIAL -A-
RIDE PROJECT IN I -494 CORRIDOR Planner Larsen explained that two demonstration
projects have been planned for the I -494 corridor as part of an effort to implement
long term Travel Demand Management (TDM) strategies. One of these, the "guaranteed
ride home" has begun and is a two year
demonstration. The other, dial -a -ride, was scheduled for the near future and would
be an 18 month demonstration. Recently, the Regional Transit Board eliminated
funding for the demonstration. The expected cost was approximately $150,000 for 18
months.
This Dial -A -Aide service would serve Edina, Richfield and Bloomington residents who
would be picked up at their door and dropped off-in one of two employment areas.
The'service shows promise as an attractive alternative to the single occupant
vehicle. A similar service has been successful in the Seattle, Washington,
metropolitan area. Staff,.members of the I -494 Corridor Commission and the
Metropolitan Council feel it is important to demonstrate the viability of
alternatives to the single occupant vehicle such as the proposed dial -a -ride
service.
Member Paulus mentioned that Travel Demand Management (TDM) is the goal of the I -494
Joint Powers Organization (JPO) and the members of the JPO feel we will not reach
any TDM unless programs like this go into effect.
Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the City of Edina is committed to efforts to relieve traffic congestion on
Interstate Highway 494, and
WHEREAS, the City of Edina wishes to improve the operating conditions of I -494 in
the most energy efficient and cost efficient manner, and
WHEREAS, the dial -a -ride service seems to be uniquely suited to suburban conditions;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina supports the proposed dial -a-
ride service and requests that the Regional Transit Board fund the demonstration
project as originally proposed.
Motion was seconded by Member Paulus.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards
Nays: Smith
Resolution adopted.
COUNCIL REMINDED OF MLC ANNUAL LEGISLATIVE DINNER SCHEDULED FOR 1/30/91 Manager
Rosland reminded the Council members to make reservations for the MLC Annual
Legislative Dinner at 6:30 P.M. at the Decathlon Club.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED TO SUPPORT GRANT FOR YARD WASTE COLLECTION .Manager Rosland said
he had received a request that the Council consider a resolution in support of a
grant application to experiment with paper yard waste bags in the City of Edina, to
reduce and stabilize the cost of yard waste collection.
Member Rice introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, yard waste is -an important part of the waste stream to divert and is
currently collected as a separate waste stream; and
WHEREAS, the cost of such collection has risen to extreme; and
WHEREAS, compost sites prefer or demand de- bagged yard waste material and plastic
yard waste bags-add -to the expense of removal at the compost site; and
WHZ]U[AS ,-paper ° -yard• waste -bags may reduce-or at least control the escalating costs
of- `yard waste' coUposting; - and
WHEREAS -, tha,Woodlake- Sanitary- Service; Inc. grant- - project - will_-create °a- process for
r the regions haulers to use, controlling the rising cost of yard waste collection;
NOW, TBMUEFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council, that the City of Edina
gives its full support to this project and requests that the Metropolitan Council
give full consideration to the application, and consider as well the value this
project brings to-the region by approving the grant award.
Motion was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Resolution adopted.
LETTER TO BE SENT TO GOVERNOR IN SUPPORT OF DEFICIT REDUCTION PACKAGE Mayor
Richards reported that he and Manager Rosland had attended a meeting of the
Municipal Legislative Commission (MLC) at which the Governor's deficit reduction
package was discussed. The issue before the MLC was to join a coalition of other
local government associations and adopt a resolution opposing the Governor's budget
cuts. Mayor Richards had told the members of the MLC that Edina could not support
such a resolution because we are serious about curtailing government spending.
It was the consensus of the Council that a letter, signed by Mayor Richards, be
transmitted to Governor Carlson in support of his propose deficit reduction package,
with copies to Edina's legislators.
*CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Member Kelly and was seconded by Member Smith to
approve payment of the following claims as shorn in detail on the Check Register
dated 1/22/91 and consisting of 32 pages: General Fund $214,745.47, C.D.B.G.
$6,060.00, Communications $1,343.57, Art Center $10,185.63, Capital Fund $6,989.62,
Swimming Pool Fund $25.00, Golf Course Fund $8,713.85; Recreation Center Fund
$8,230.17, Gun Range Fund $581.74, Edinborough Park $18,964.49, Utility Fund
$9,148.19, Liquor Dispensary Fund $88,029.63, Construction Fund $662,232.53, IMP
Bond Redemption #2 $853.85, TOTAL $1,036,103.74; and for confirmation of payment of
the following claims as shorn in detail on the Check Register dated 12/31/90 and
consisting of 18 pages: General Fund $579,348.96, Communications $13,657.73, Art
Center $1,344.20, Swimming Pool Fund $116.75, Golf Course Fund $6,816.50, Recreation
Center Fund $11,484.19, Gun Range Fund $408.54, Edinborough Park $9,129.47, Utility
Fund $26,404.08, Storm Sewer Utility $489.07, Liquor Dispensary Fund $314,216.50,
Construction Fund $2,637.50, TOTAL $966,053.49.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the
meeting adjourned at 11:15 P.M.
City Clerk
oil
A. It \
O
. ,
�^�bnoreww•
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
i To:
KENNETH ROSLAND
j From:
KRIS AAKER
i Date:
MARCH 4, 1991
Subject:
C 91-2, TEMPORARY
To HRA
CONDITIONAL USE
!
E
PERMIT, HOME OCCUPA-
Action
TION, DR. JOYCE
Motion
ANDERSON, 7121
GLOUCHESTER AVENUE
Recommendation:
Info /Background
Agenda Item ## II. A.
Consent
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
F7
To HRA
!
E
To Council
Action
r lI
Motion
Resolution
Ordinance
C
Discussion
The City Council, on February 4, 1991, voted to reconsider the
issuance of a Temporary Conditional Use Permit for Dr. Joyce
Anderson.
Notice of this hearing was published in the Sun - Current and mailed
to property owners within 350 feet pursuant to Zoning Ordinance
requirements.
Attached to this cover is a detailed outline of Dr. Anderson's
proposed hours and days of operation. This outline was submitted
following the February 4,.1991, meeting.
GRAY, PLANT, MOOTY, MOOTY & BENNETT, P.A.
INCLUDING THE FORMER FIRM OF HARSfAD & RAINBOW
HAROLD G. CANT 11887 -1973,
HENRY W. HAVERSTOCK 118 4-1 9771
�/�/� `fin
CM1 CCEEN lyG�l�-��
FRANKLIN D. GRAY ! 1904 -19901
TROY,A. BADER
LAURAJ. HEIN
EDWARD A. GARVEY
MYRON L. FRANS
L34W
THIRTY THREE SOU l Cl SIA 1 [7 SMET
FRANK W. PLANT, JR.
DANIEL R. SHULMAN
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402.3796
JOHN W. MOOTY
MICHAEL R. CUNNINGHAM
'rp-
MELVIN R. MOOTY
ROBERT P. LARSON
gpHONE612.343'2800
SHEFFIELD WEST
THOMAS L, JOHNSON
GEORGE R. WOOD
RUSSELL M. BENNETT
RICHARD A. MOORE. JR.
" FAJ((i12.333.0066
CLINTON A. SCHROEDER
WILLIAM L. KILLION
NANCY ROETMAN MENZEL
C. E LAINE HARSTAD
ELIZABETH W. NORTON
'j�(!j(%lO.576.2778
EDWARD J. CALLAHAN. JR.
JOHN E. BROWER
DEAN A. LEDOUX
JAMES S. SIMONSON
'THOMAS DARLING
RICHARD N. FLINT
JOHN M. NICHOLS'
WADE T. ANDERSON
C URTIS D. FORSLUND
MARTHA A. VAN DE VEN
D. JAMES NIELSEN
M AC LAY R. HYDE
MARY BETH BRODY
VALERIE BOLES WAGONER
BRUCE D. GRUSS ING
EDWIN R. HOLMES
DAVID M, COYNE
C. STEVEN WILSON -
DAVID N. MOOTY
JOHN S. CROUCH
RICHARD A. HACKETT
DAV ID T. BENNETT
WILLIAM D. KLEIN
EDWIN C. CARPENTER
SUSAN L. SEGAL
LINDLEY S. BRANSON
NICHOLAS N. NIERENGARTEN
JOHN W. THIEL
ALBERT ANDREWS, JR.
JOHN L. KRENN
STEPHEN R.EDE
DIRECT DIAL 343 -2863
NOEL P MULLER
JOHN D. GI UDICES SI. JR.
DOUGLAS R. RAINBOW
KATHLEEN S. TILLOTSON
FRANKLIN C. JESSE, JR.
MICHAEL C. FLOM
DAV ID L. WH ITE
DAVID C. BAHLS
BRUCE E. KIERNAT
PHILLIP BOHL
February 11 1991
Mr. Craig Larsen
City Planner
City.of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Mr. Larsen:
JAMES F. CARROLL
BARBARA E. TRETHEWAY
ROBERT E. HARDING
TROY,A. BADER
LAURAJ. HEIN
EDWARD A. GARVEY
MYRON L. FRANS
MARA R. THOMPSON
ERIK T. SALVE SON
MARK E. MULHOLLAM
RICHARD G. BRAMAN
NANCYJ. MILLER
PENNY M. T18 KE
STACY A. LEVIN
NANCY QUATTLEBAUM BURKE SUSAN DECKER LENCZEWSKI
. WILLIAM J. FISHER
CHARLOTTE A,'KIMBALL
VIRGINIA S. SCHUBERT
GINA B. SAUER
GEORGE R. WOOD
WILLIAM R. PECK
TAMARA HJELLE OLSEN
JOHN G. SHULMAN
LYNN B. NOLAND
TERRY M. WALCOTT
NANCY ROETMAN MENZEL
QUENTIN R. WITTROCK
ROBERTJ.MCREAVY
DEAN A. LEDOUX
GREGORYR.MERZ
BRIAN B. SCHNELL
OF COUNSEL
WADE T. ANDERSON
ROBERT L. HELLAND
ARTHUR W. DICKINSON
D. JAMES NIELSEN
LAURAJ. SCHOENBAUER
DANIEL B. VENTRES. JR.
VALERIE BOLES WAGONER
ROBERT A. STEIN
RICK E. KUBLER
DAVID M, COYNE
TIMOTHY M. BURKE
BETSYB.BAKER
Enclosed please find a supplement to the application of
Dr. Joyce Anderson. It is my understanding that this will be
back before the council on March 4.
JWM:jja
0643Y
Enclosure
r
SIPPLEMENT TO
APPLICATION OF •R. JOYCE G. s_ +• •,
The undersigned applicant wishes to supplement her
application for a temporary use permit by stating as follows:
(1) No trips will occur on Sunday;
(2) no trips will occur after 12:00 noon on Saturday;
(3) on Monday through Friday, no appointment will be made
to:
(a)
commence after 5:00 p.m.;
(b)
no appointment will extend beyond 6:00 p.m.;
(c)
not more than one appointment shall occur during
the period from 5:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
(d)
no appointment shall overlap with any other
appointment;
(e)
no appointment shall be made that commences
before 9:30 a.m.;
(f)
in no event shall more than six appointments be
made in any day nor more than twenty in any week;
(g)
all vehicles of, clients shall park off - street;
(h)
no changes shall be made in either the interior
or exterior of the premises.
Dated:
T
2206.Y
Dr. Joyc ,G. Anderson
109 1-.,.i,chester me
Ed-Ic.r- MN 55435
City CJ ;.-u-'ina CITY C,(.IJr4-'[!- Planning'(.)epartmeent
4801 'vest 50th Str.:!ei:
Edina 1VIN. 1.-,:;424
Ladies and Cjentiewm,
We IvEive no t)roblem with ariv additloiial. L r-.:-If f i c :IL -Ar'l' 1:0ur c;l
t he J' -_-,Y that, *jrju 1.0' be c rcmjr.ed with 0 r . ;I%nderson'• u ..., tz. permit.
Please issue the Permi t Dr. Anderson for the N'XII-S.
requests and -for cm? nmirreer of patients she would I 1"a t.c
haY6 v1 sit her rasidenc-6.
Thank ..ou
..'im & V';(;k,. Reicha-At
Alt
i ,&/ A �% 7,A4 . .. S a?44
42
T 4, ,^o i/.crc , / r- - >?L v /G w
4 lam E i Af (s ink :Z44 e,: c a !,e At G /
a t2._ s a^r
AG A,, 7-4 t r.2 a E co nr c � � �v �-Pl�noyG
A ^c � eoS .7A 4T /bn�
0aCi T7 . k/ <j - To /1-7.4 LCD 0 /f C' $,I-ofI -E
7-Ar e-- gs s /\C o cz,- , .s. p s -7 y1 r c /+-C
(Z viz m vize- yk o 1 v T,4 c - �H �A-e— A s 13
Ao 1��-aT b�-�- D�2���r 6 T •� i Pr/L /o p o /I-
�e � A 12--5 Tim � -T �1 oor D.�� -.s o�c.( /�1 �- -� " s-= �D
z?l
C714 An�-Jm--1
-D2
ply. /Z- lAfa 7-?V�
4e
^tZ>jl=
-4 A-
11
t�!
MAYO S. BRANDJORD
7112 Glouchester
Edina, Minnesota 55435
(612) 925 -2690
February 1, 1991
Edina Mayor Richards
City Council Members
City. Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
RE: Amendment to zoning ordinance #825 as it applies to Dr. Joyce Anderson,
owner and resident at 7121 Glouchester Avenue
Greetings:
My wife and I own our house at 7112 Glouchester Avenue which we purchased in
1976. I have attended all but one of the City Hall meetings related to the referenced
issue.
The use of Dr. Anderson's home has been given a fair hearing. I do not believe that
there is anything new of importance to present to the Council. Therefore, I hope
that the Council will try very hard to render a fair decision at the February 4
meeting.
In the following I will review some of the,information put before the Council that I
think should dictate the Council's final decision:
1. The Council acted wisely when it amended the referenced Ordinance #825 to
accommodate the handicapped. The Council also acted wisely when it kept a
tight control over the application approval process. The amendment gives
voice and protection to the neighborhood. The Council will have final control
over the use of private homes for business purposes in Edina, which will
prevent any abuse. However, when the Council reviews an application, it must
not place more restrictions on one applicant than on another, handicapped or
non - handicapped. All restrictions should be reasonable and have a sound basis
for being applied. If the approval includes too many restrictions, it becomes
only a cruel sham. The applicant must be able to give normal expected hours
of service and must be able to make a reasonable income.
2. Dr. Anderson is an established resident of Edina. She has served clients in her
homes for seven or eight years. First, one block south of her present home and
three to four years at 7121 Glouchester Avenue. She is not an interlooper who
sneaked "into the neighborhood. She purchased her home openly and made a
point of meeting with her new neighbors and told them about her practice. In
earlier years she taught piano to hundreds of students in her home at other
locations and was unaware of any restrictions on the use of her home for
present clients.
F.,dina Mayor Richards
February 1, 1991
Page Two
KE
3. Dr. Anderson's clients add very little vehicular traffic to Glouchester Avenue.
There is not a traffic problem, even with many neighbors operating two and
three cars and have teenage drivers. There should never be a question about
how many clients use her driveway because it can be checked against Dr.
Anderson's client logs.
4. Those who claim that Dr. Anderson should be able to operate from a medical
building, ignore the professional medical opinion on her physical limitations.
Where medical buildings do provide special ingress and egress and toilet
accommodations for the handicapped, that's about it. Medical examining
rooms certainly are not appropriate for counseling and certainly do not make
allowances for Dr. Anderson's physical limitations. The limited hours Dr.
Anderson can physically work also limits the number of clients she can see in
one day, and of course limits her income. The size of her practice will not
support the expense of a little used office.
5. I repeat what I have stated before the Council. Dr. Anderson is•a credit to our
neighborhood and has not caused any problems over the three or four years she
has served her.clients in her home on our block. The whole dispute over her
use of her home should not have been taken to the Planning Department in the
first place. That action is now a confirmed shame, and regretted by almost all
of the neighbors.
I ask that the Council approve Dr. Anderson's application without any limitations on
the hours and days of the week she can see her clients.
Respectfully submitted,
Mayo S7Brandj - -
AGENDA ITEM: II.A.
Received - 3/1/91 4:10 P.M.
March 1, 1991
7113 Cornelia Drive
Edina, MN 55435
Edina City Council
Edina City Hall
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mayor Richards and City Council Members:
The uul,jeut. of this letter is the attempt by Dr. Joyce Anderson
to'practluu psychology at her residence for more than the allowable
number of patients, 10, that she is allowed to see according to the
city codes. This is the third letter that we have written and hope
that this issue will be decided soon. In addition to all the
reasons for not allowing this Temporary Condition Use Permit, such
as traffic, hours of visitation, public safety matters, and some of
the council members analogy with a psychologist and a music teacher,
and the threatening of the council by certain handicapped lawyers
who want to make this case a bigger issue than it is, two other
concerns have surfaced.
The first one deals with the use of the Cornelia School parking lot
as a place for the clients to park and walk to the Anderson
residence should show the Council and Planning Commission that this
person, Dr. Anderson, is trying to conceal the true number of
patients that she is actually seeing. The principal.of the school
has notified the Planning Commission that he has heard from several
of the neighbors, including myself who has witnessed at least three
park -and walk clients last week alone, that the lot is being used
by her clients as a parking lot for her business. Perhaps she would
like to share the parking lot expenses with the school district.
The second one deals with the clients parking directly across from
our living room in the school lot and stare into our home. We have
also noticed that some of the clients are dropped off for their
appointment andthe school lot is the place where the driver waits
for the client. We feel that we are having our privacy violated by
these lookers. Last night upon driving to a store, we noticed a
male enter Dr. Anderson's business. When coming back from the store
an hour later, we noticed the same man walking down the street. We
passed him again and noticed that he got into his car in the school
parkiny lut. We started unloading groceries from our car as this man
approached our driveway upon which he slowed down made inappropriate
faces at both my wife, son and myself. I don't think that we must
put up with this kind of behavior from a client of Dr. Anderson. We
live in this area and should not be the subject of abuse from Dr.
Anderson's patients. I did call the police department to register
the man's licence number and the others that I have written down. I
will be calling the police anytime we have a looker or strange
behavior from a patient.
We feel strongly that this permit should be denied for many reasons
that have listed. With using the school parking lot to try to avoid
being detected as a countable client (10 per week) has cast a shadow
on the integrity of the person applying for this permit.
(2)
Sincerely,
Paul S. Wehrineister
Joan C. Wehrmeister
r
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM II.A
City of Edina Planning Department
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Re: Case file C -91 -2, Temporary Conditional Use Permit Application of Dr. Joyce G. Anderson
Honorable Members of the Council:
At the time of Joyce's previous approach to the council , I wrote you about my thoughts on the matter.
I also attended the council meeting and was pleased at the concern shown by some of the council members
for residential needs and balancing those needs with Ms. Anderson's. My position has not changed.. The
existing code which she proposes to operate within goes as far as it should. As it's written it makes
exception to normal residential zoning and should not be amended any further. I will restate what I put
forth before:
My primary concern in this matter is the erosion of the residential nature of Edina and our neighborhood in
particular. One of the distinctive. attractions of the city has been its ability to sustain fine residential
neighborhoods in close proximity to urban areas. The edges of the community are the first to feel the
impact of adjacent business districts in the form of traffic and noise. The city has done a superb job of
isolating this effect by maintaining adequate zoning. I would hope that this endures so that Edina continues
to have quality neighborhoods throughout.
Cities require businesses to spend a great deal of money to make their buildings handicap accessible. This
is appropriate. Apparently Joyce has used some of these facilities and for whatever reason prefers working
out of her home. Possibly she could utilize the office during the hours which conflict with the ordinance.
Please vote NO , Thank you.
D.Glen Whitesell
7116 Heatherton Trail
AGENDA ITEM - COUNCIL II.A
A.
0, y City of Edina, Minnesota
CITY COUNCIL
-- -- - - - _ - 4901 West 50th Street- Edlna, Minnesota 5S424 (612) 9274=1
'lip I'� t;;.. .., �.. �. �.. �.. � ,o..,...w.lP& : :i : : : : :f. : :.;.•r,
^. ".:Olk ;} ... �: :::: x; :.v^.'oo :;:;Y��:E�A :;; : : :..; : :y if :;cRi;kc:.':x, :.. :.f� y:; •'i� :�:
..:::.r.• . ..... .. : > :... : -h.� :: :yo- A,. : : :,•k:< : :,s, ..•• ��•�."'.,�•, ::
CASE FILE: C-91-2
TO: Property Owners Within 350 Feet
APPLICANT: Joyce G. Anderson
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 7121 Glouchester Avenue
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 5, Block 2, Stow' s Addition
Reconsideration of a
PURPOSE: Temporary Conditional Use Permit
DATE OF HEARING: Monday, March 4, 1991
TIME OF HEARING: 7:00 PM
PLACE OF HEARING: Coundi Chambers
Edina City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
HOW TO PARTICIPATE: 1. Submit a letter to the address below expressing your views, and/or
2. Attend the hearing and give testimony for or against the proposal.
FURTHER INFORMATION: City of Edina Planning Department
4801 West 50th Street
Edina MN SS424
(612) 9274MI
DATE OF NOTICE: February 23, 19 91
��% 22Z - ,
FA 6-4 1 WIZ to I 1 514 � =- 1AP -- I a "�% to
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM II.A
>>
Agenda Item II.A.
Received 3/4/91 - 3:35 P.M.
/9Q/
U 716 C� --s-.
Y,71
0
So
!�J//
i
l _ / W—M
i/ 9� 7; �Si�
elm'
Cn
r.Ty i C
NOW-
REFORTIREO OMMENDATION
To: KENNETH ROSLAND
From: KRIS AAKER
Date: MARCH 4, 1991
Subject: B-91-2, VARIANCE
REQUEST, U.S.-NEW
VECTOR GROUP. .5600
Agenda Item.—II- B_
Consent
Information Only I-7
Mgr. Recommends Q To HRA
71 To Council
Action 771 Motion
LINCOLN DRIVE. i
Resolution
I_! Ordinance
I_! Discussion
Recommendation:
Affirm decision for denial of attached variance request.
Info /Background:
At their February 7, 1991 meeting the Edina Board.of Appeals and
Adjustments heard the U.S. New Vector Group's request for setback
and height variances to install a 98 foot tall monopole antenna
tower and utility building to be located in the southeast corner of
property located at 5600 Lincoln Drive (please refer to Location
"A" on the attached plan.) The Board of Appeals and Adjustments
voted unanimously to deny the request in agreement with staff
recommendation based on the lack of demonstrated hardship.
The proponent has appealed the board's decision and has requested
that the .proposal be heard by the City - Council. Since the board of
appeals meeting the applicant has provided staff with two
additional alternatives. The first alternative located near the
west property boundary and Highway 169 would require an 11 foot
rear yard setback variance for the utility building and a 23 foot
height variance and 78 foot rear yard setback variance for the
antenna tower (please refer to Location "B" on the attached plan).
The second alternative proposed is located in the Northeast corner
of the property and would comply with all ordinance requirements
(75 feet for antenna height and setback). Please refer to Location
"C" on the attached plan.
DAVID W. LARSON & ASSOCIATES
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
476•A BUTLER SQUARE 1
100 NORTH SIXTH STREET
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55403 -1503
TELEPHONE (612) 333 -1727
FAX (612) 333 -1337
DAVID W. CARSON• ' *ALSO ADMITTED IN WISCONSIN
IAYMFS D. LITTLEIOHN•• **ALSO ADMITTED IN NORTH DAKOTA
SUSAN M. POMNGER
February 27, 1991
Ms. Chris Aaker
Associate Planner
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Re: Appeal of Board of Appeals and Adjustments
Dear Ms. Aaker:
As we have discussed, US West NewVector Group is appealing the
decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals and Adjustments to deny
the variance request for its antenna and building at 5600 Lincoln
Drive.
Following the meeting of the Board of Zoning Appeals and
Adjustments, representatives of NewVector met with'the owner of
the parcel at 5600 Lincoln Drive, Mr. Mickey Orren. After some
discussion about the issues of the Board and the residents
concerning the proposed site, Mr. Orren generously agreed to make
available additional locations on the parcel for the proposed
antenna.
One of these locations is on the Northeast corner of the building,
about 115 feet north of the originally proposed site. The
advantage of this location is that a 75 foot antenna can be placed
without any sort of variance required. The site is more than 75
feet from any. property line. The disadvantage of this location
from a resident's point of view is that the antenna, while somewhat .
shorter, is not significantly less visible than the antenna-on the
originally proposed site. From the US West NewVector perspective,
a 75 foot antenna, according to our engineers, is shorter than
optimum and will cause technical difficulties with the system.
However, a 75 foot antenna here is preferable to one in a different
location farther from the search zone. We have applied for a
Ms. Chris Aaker
Re: Appeal of Board of Appeals and Adjustments
Page 2
building permit for this site for a 75 foot antenna.
The other location discussed with Mr. Orren is in the Northwest
corner of the parcel, next to Highway 169. This location is about
560 feet west of the Northeast corner location. This location has
some engineering difficulties, in that it is quite close to Highway
169. Mobile telephones directly underneath the antenna could lose
reception. That disadvantage would be offset by other advantages
if we could construct a 98 foot pole in this location. To
construct here would require three variances:
1. The rear yard set back for the equipment building is 20
feet, or the building height (11 feet), whichever is greater.
There is only 25 feet between the lot line and the parking
lot. The equipment building is 12 feet wide, and has doors
that open in the direction of the parking lot, which require
an additional 4 feet in width. As a result, the building
would be 9 feet from the property line, and the applicant
requires an 11 foot variance from a 20 foot setback, or a 19
foot variance if the code is interpreted to require a setback
equal to the height of the principal building, which is 28
feet.
2. The antenna height limitation is 75 feet. In order to
install a 98 foot antenna, the applicant requires a 23 foot
height variance.
3. The City administrative staff has interpreted the zoning
code to require that an antenna of 98 feet be 98 feet from the
lot lines. The applicant disagrees with this interpretation,
and asks the council to reverse this administrative
determination and the Board of Appeals on this point. The
applicant's reasons are set forth in some length in the
application to the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, and are
in the record for the Councils' review. In the event that the
Council does not reverse the administrative determination, the
antenna pole would be 20 feet from the rear lot line, and the
applicant requires a set -back variance of 78 feet from the
State of Minnesota highway right of way.
The applicant's interpretation of the zoning code is that the
setback for the antenna is the same as that for the principal
building or structure on the property, the office /warehouse
building. That building varies in height between 22 and 28
feet from ground level. If the council adopts the applicants
interpretation of the zoning code, the antenna at this
location requires an 8 foot setback variance.
Ms. Chris Aaker
Re: Appeal of Board of Appeals and Adjustments
Page 3
Using a Computer Aided Design system, the applicant has created a'
model of the building, the area topography, and the proposed poles
and antennas. Various surveys, - aerial photographs, and
measurements were used to construct this computer model. The
mathematical -.relationships are calculated by the computer, and a
visual image of the proposed antenna can be created from different
perspectives, with the antenna in different locations and at
different heights. On the computer screen, it appears that a 98
foot pole, or even a 75 foot pole on the east end of the building
will have a significantly greater visual presence with nearby
residents than a 98 foot pole in the northwest site, 560 feet
farther away. Unfortunately, there are several steps necessary to
convert the computer screen image to a presentation display, and
while those displays will be available by Friday of this week, and
for the Council meeting, they are not available for this
submission.
Thank you for giving me the opportunity to give the Edina City
Council this supplementary information about our appeal.
Sincerely,
David W. Larson
DWL/ j rb
cc': Fred Ruher.
Bob Davis.
Jim Swisher
DAVID W. LARSON & ASSOCIATES
A'170RNEYS AT LAW
DAVID W. LARSON•
JAYMES D. L:ITTLEJOHN-
SUSAN M. POTTENGER
February 15, 1991
City Clerk
City of Edina
4801 West 50th St.
Edina, Minnesota 55434
1.
476 -.A BUTLER SQUARE
NO NORTH SIXTH STREET
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55403 -1503
TELEPHONE 16121 333 -1727
FAX (61 2) 333.1337
Re: U.S. West NewVector Group
Our File: 1550
Dear City Clerk:
*ALSO ADMITTED IN WISCONSIN
ALSO ADMITTED IN NORTH DAKOTA
On February 7, 1991, the Edina Board of Appeals and Adjustments
denied the request of U.S. West NewVector Group for setback and
height variances'for an antenna and support structure to be
located at 5600 Lincoln Drive, an industrial- warehouse area.
By this letter, we state our desire to appeal this decision to
the Edina City Council.
One of the concerns of the residents was that the proposed
antenna would have an impact on the value of their homes. Mr.
Tim Connery, an appraiser located in Edina and familiar with
Edina residential property,, has given the opinion that the
antenna pole would have "no measurable value impact upon the
surrounding neighborhood properties ". I have included a copy of
that appraisal.
Please let me know any further procedural steps that may be
necessary, as well as any hearing dates.
CONNEAY & ASSOCIATES, INC. REAL ESTATE'APPRAISERS — CONSULTANTS
7300 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH a MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55435 ■ ' (612) 831.8116
February 12, 1991
DAVID W. LARSON & ASSOCIATES
Attention: David W. Larson
476 -A Butler Square
100 North Sixth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55403 -1503
RE: Cellular Telephone Antenna Site
U.S. West New Vector Group, Inc.
5600 Lincoln Drive
Edina, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Larson:
In accordance with your request, I have made a preliminary investigation of the
potential market value impact of the proposed cellular telephone antenna site to
the surrounding properties.
The proposed communication complex will consist of 98 foot cellular telephone
monopole antenna tower, and a 12'x36' pre-fabricated equipment building that will
have a height of approximately 102 feet. The present zoning for the site is
Planned Industrial District(PID) which is my understanding allows up to 75 foot
high towers.
The immediate area can be best described as being in the northeast corner of 62nd
Crosstown and Highway 4169. For the most part, properties located along Highway
44169'are industrial /office buildings and residential (condominiums, manor homes,
twin homes, and detached single family homes). The residential area is primarily
known as Parkwood Knolls, Malibu Heights, Edina Green, Nine Mile North, Londonberry,
Manor Homes of Edina, -Edina West and The Habitat. The general area topography is
rolling to hilly with curved and cul -de -sac streets.
The subject site is located on the end of a cul -de -sac east facing, overlooking
a wildlife area that is wooded and has Nine Mile Creek meandering north /south.
I have personally appraised homes in this area, specifically Malibu ?& Parkwood Knolls,
and found no'measurable impact of value due to the distant views of non - residential
properties.
CONNERY ` ASSOCIATES, INC. REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS - CONSULTANTS
Mr. David W. Larson
February 12, 1991
Page #2
Presently, the residential properties to the east and northeast have generally
distant views of.industrial /office building properties (primarily the Opus Tower
and the PHP buildings). The affect of the monopole antenna in relationship to
the already present views in my opinion, have no measurable value impact upon the
surrounding neighborhood properties.
Thank you for this opportunity to be of service to you. Please contact me if I
can be of further assistance.
Cordially,
CONNERY,& ASSOCIATES, INC.
Timothy J. Con /nnvery, SRPA
Appraiser
TJC /bla
Enclosure: Certification and Statement of Limiting Conditions
Appraiser's Qualifications
Vicinity Map
Area Plan
Site Plan
Elevation /Structure Plan
w
CONNERY 67 ASSOCIATES, INC. REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS - CONSULTANTS
CERTIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF LIMITING CONDITIONS
CERTIFICATION: The Appraiser. certifies and agrees that: 1) The Appraiser has no
present or contemplated future interest in the property appraised and that neither
the employment to make the appraisal, nor the compensation for-it, is contingent
upon the appraised value of the property. 2) The Appraiser has no personal interest
in or bias with respect to the subject matter of the appraisal report. 3) The Appraiser
has personally inspected the property, both inside and out, and that according to the
best of the Appraiser's knowledge and belief, all statements and information in this
report are true and correct, and that. the Appraiser has not knowingly withheld any
significant information. 4) All contingent and limiting conditions are contained herein
(imposed by the terms of the assignment or by the undersigned affecting the analyses,
opinions, and conclusions contained in this report). 5), This appraisal report has been
made in conformity with and is subject -to the requirements of the Code of Professional
Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct of the appraisal organizations with which
the Appraiser is affiliated. 6) All conclusions and opinions concerning the real estate
that are set forth in the appraisal report were prepared by the,Appraiser whose signat-
ure appears on this appraisal report, unless indicated as "Review Appraiser ". No change
of any item of the appraisal report shall be made by anyone other than the appraiser,
and the Appraiser shall have no responsibility for any such unauthorized change.
CONTINGENT AND LIMITING CONDITIONS: The certification of the Appraiser appearing in
this appraisal report is subject to the following conditions: 1) The Appraiser assumes
no responsibility for matters of.a legal nature affecting the property appraised or
the title thereto, nor does ,the Appraiser render any opinion as to the title, which is
assumed to be good and marketable. The property is appraised as though under reasonable
ownership. 2) The sketch in this report is included to assist the reader in visualizing
the property, and the Appraiser assumes no responsibility for its accuracy. The Appraise
has made no survey of the property. 3) The Appraiser is not required to give testimony.
or appear in court because of having made this appraisal, with reference to the property
in question, unless arrangements have been previously made therefor. 4)The distribution
of the total valuation in this report between land and improvements applies only under
the existing program of utilization. The separate valuations for land and building must
not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and are invalid if so used. 5) The
Appraiser assumes that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property,
subsoil, or structures which would render it more or less valuable. The Appraiser
assumes no responsibility for such conditions or for engineering which might be required
to discover such factors. 6) Information, estimates, and opinions furnished to the
Appraiser and contained in this report were obtained from sources considered reliable
and believed to be true and correct. However, no responsibility for accuracy of such
items furnished the Appraiser can be assumed by the Appraiser. 7) Disclosure by the
Appraiser of the contents of this appraisal report is subject to review in accordance
with the by -laws and regulations of the professional appraisal organizations with which
the Appraiser is affiliated. 8) Neither all nor part of the contents of this report, or
copy thereof, shall'be used for any other purpose, than those previously mentioned,
without the written consent of the Appraiser, nor shall it be conveyed by anyone to the
public through advertising, public. relations, news, sales, or other media, without the
written consent and approval of the Appraiser: 9) On all appraisals, subject to
satisfactory, completion, repairs, or alterations, the appraisal report and value
conclusion are contingent upon completion of the improvements in a workmanlike manner.
10) In this appraisal assignment, the existence of potentially hazardous material used
in the construction or maintenance of the building, such as the ..presence of.urea -form-
aldehyde foam insulation, and /or the existence of toxic waste, which may or may not be
present on the property, was not observed by me; nor do I have any knowledge of the
existence of such materials on or in the property. The Appraiser, however, is not
qualified to detect such substances. The existence of urea - formaldehyde foam insulation
or other potentially hazardous waste material may have an effect on the value of the
property. I (we) urge the client to retain an expert in this field if desired.
CONNERY s7 ASSOCIATES, INC.' REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS - CONSULTANTS
QUALIFICATIONS OF APPRAISER
Timothy J. Connery, SRPA
I. PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIP
Society of Real Estate Appraisers, Senior Real Property Appraiser(SRPA) and Senior
Residential Appraiser(SRA) designations. Affiliate member of the Greater Minneapolis
Area Board of Realtors. State o•f�Minnesota licensed appraiser I.D.#4000534.
II. SPECIALIZED EDUCATION
Since being in the appraisal profession, have completed various real estate courses
at the University of Minnesota. Have also completed courses sponsored by the Society
of Real Estate Appraisers, which are: Introduction to Appraising Real Estate(Course
101), Principles of Income Property Appr.aising(Course 201)(both held at Macalester
College), plus a Narrative Report Seminar, Mortgage Equity Analysis Seminar, the
Valuation of Leases and Leasehold Interest Seminar, Creative Financing /Cash Equivalency
Seminar, Adjusting for Financial Differences in Residential Properties Seminar, Energy
Considerations in Real Estate Appraising Seminar, ERC- Relocation Appraisal Seminar,
Professional Practice Seminar, and the Appraiser's Guide to the Uniform Appraisal
Report Seminar. Have instructed an appraisal course sponsored by the Society of.
Real Estate Appraisers.and for the Minneapolis Vocational Adult Evening School.
III. APPRAISAL EXPERIENCE
Real estate experience dates from 1962. From 1978 to the present, have been an
independent fee appraiser and president of Connery & Associates, Inc., a Real
Estate Appraiser- Consultant firm. From 1968 to 1978 was employed as a staff fee
appraiser for a local independent real estate appraisal firm. From 1962 to 1968
was employed as a deputy assessor. Real estate appraisal assignments completed
include residential, multiple family, vacant acreage, subdivision, special purpose,
commercial and industrial properties. Have qualified and testified as an expert
witness in Hennepin County District Court. Have also been appointed a commissioner
for Hennepin County District Court.
IV. CLIENTS
Appraisal and consultation assignments completed for attorneys representing clients,
various national and local corporations, employee relocation companies, financial
institutions, investors, various government agencies, prospective sellers, buyers,
and others.
Some of these are: Associates Relocation Services, Better Homes & Gardens Real
Estate Service, Coldwell Banker Relocation Management Services, Corporate Transfer
Service, Corporate Relocation Services, Eastman Kodak Company, Empire of America
Relocation Services, Inc., Executive Relocation Corporation, FBS Mortgage, Federal
National Mortgage Association(FNMA), First Bank Lake, Gen Rel Relocation Management
Group; ICA Mortgage Corp., Knutson Mortgage & Financial Corp., Lender's Service Inc.,
Lomas Mortgage USA, Maenner Relocation Inc., Opus Corporation, PHH Homequity, Prudential
Relocation Management, Relocation Resources Inc., Rothschild Financial,.State of
Minnesota Department of Administration, Department of Natural Resourses, Department
of.Transportation, Transequity Inc., Travelers Relocation, U.S.:West Relocation
Services, United Mortgage Corp., Verex Assurance, Western Relocation.
The purpose of the appraisals were for condemnation, insurance, employee transfers,
estate settlement, taxation, mortgages, foreclosure, divorce settlement, marketing,
acquisition, rental value, leasehold interest, etc.
Vicinity Map
A
t 570
0
621
6700 6620 I 6616
FIELD •&I
01 6621 6617
6620 I 606 I 6
6617 I 6G
33 Ci
2t
661.6 1 6GI2
" I i
' AMERICAN iISH
f fEAF000
- -��
SNETANA COURT
I
m I
I
p PARKING RAMP
� I
7 r
•O 5�%
A
AREA PLAN
o•n +own • .
• P H P COMPLEE.
AREA PLAN
1
..� �
1� Irr
.,
I ) RESIDE 1
�
1� r I NTILL NEIGHBORHOODS
EO NB DYSINESf i0. 1 \\�`�_ •1\ I
/ -- —.I _.O•va / ; % WETLAND GREEN /l r _
S600BUILOING f/
• ,a DDr f J I L ITE'PIAI: SHEET Iil
_ o� (
P� rowE�1 1 �I -• ; 1 � fJ(� IS �I
MORTN \IIJ J /// l• I. II�'� �I'' J
0 25 IOD S00 i
AREA SECTION A -A
PROPOSED DASHED IIIDICATES APPROX. HEIGHT
SfOD OUILDII+D -� MOHGPOLE • -y OF TREES AND BRUSH
5606. RESIDENCE
RCA PLAN aw,y — TIM, CANI-l'IU -11;
Iil_A SECTION A A MINHY169.YT
5600 LINCOLN DNVC NEMECTOR GROUP. IfJC. ..
! EDINA. MINNESOTA u5, wl:a IawvLG\pt [J IOYI•, i1Q.
O_
2
SITE PLAN
TO [DINA BYSINESS CEIITER
PLRRINO_
S600 LINCOLN DRIVE PROPOSED
MONOPOLE' IT
L • I I 1-' LOADING DOCKS
QEQUIP. BLOC
SOUTH ELEVATION
►ARKIIIG
3100 LINCOLN DRIVE ST20 LINCOLN DRIVE
NORTH
SITE PLAN I = T-
0 23 50 200
f�
DIRECTIONAL ANTENNAS, 4-1 1
PROPOSED
MONOPOLE
EXISTING BUILDING SIGH —\
.
\
EQUIP. BLDG
\i •
/
/
L
WETLANDS L
BRUSH�Z
/4
I
•
DIRECTIONAL ANTENNAS, 4-1 1
PROPOSED
MONOPOLE
EXISTING BUILDING SIGH —\
.
\
EQUIP. BLDG
\i •
L
;OUThI ELEVATION LOADINGDOCKITVP•I• '
O ,0 23 so
TC PLAN o TIIE CArlsrrom Grour. INc. i
d���E _a�PTERL , T :rL IX.. ►nLL�f I
)UTI'I ELL -NATION n,11NHV,69•XT - •-- -.-..- .�.,.. —�. I
5600 LINCOLN DRIVE NEW✓ECTOR GROUP. INC.
EDBIA. MINNESOTA US. WEST PEW VECTOR GROUP, INC. •' �•"�'
I ,....t.�, .n.
-Q
ELEVATION /STRUCTURE PLAN
(9) &' PtXEGTWNAL ANTENNA$
gg' �1L L•
ro
I' vl¢6GTia+el. eN�ur+ss
rot CELLULAR. rFL&PHONELS
I
PROPOSED
MONOPOLE
EXISTING
BUILDING
�i
t
Mouo PIOL —
NEW fLH14TING5
f t
STP1R� = r _— 1
I TI G CIA= — -
NE:w GRADE
96' KEYMME
MASONRY _
RETAINLNC WAIL
.PROPOSED
BUILDING
0
1
SOUTH
ELEVATIOl
LOCATION
0
amm
0
RD CT.
1
r• •.
' r
h"S�
0
amm
0
RD CT.
FOUNTAINW000
AP-TS-
VARIANCE
NUMBER' B -91 -2
MAP
.:.NU
N� •'NUT
DOGE • . �� .. :..
RK` 4?
EL MILL!
f 10NAL A
LOCATION 5600 Lincoln Drive
REQUEST A 46 foot front yard setback variance, a 23 foot height
variance, a 16 foot front yard setback variance.
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
r• •.
' r
FOUNTAINW000
AP-TS-
VARIANCE
NUMBER' B -91 -2
MAP
.:.NU
N� •'NUT
DOGE • . �� .. :..
RK` 4?
EL MILL!
f 10NAL A
LOCATION 5600 Lincoln Drive
REQUEST A 46 foot front yard setback variance, a 23 foot height
variance, a 16 foot front yard setback variance.
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
EDINA BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS
STAFF REPORT
FEBRUARY 7, 1991
B -91 -2 U.S. Aest'New Vector Group
5600 Lincoln Drive
That part of Lot 1, Lying in the Northwest
1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 31,
Township 117,,Range 21, Lot 1, Block 1, Prestige
2nd Addition
zoning: PID, Planned Industrial District
Request: A 46 foot front yard setback variance for an
antenna tower. A 23 foot height variance for
the antenna'tower. A 16 foot front yard setback
variance for a utility building.
The U.S. West New Vector Group has submitted an application to
construct a 90 foot high antenna tower on top of which will be
mounted nine directional antennas, for a total installation height
of 98 feet and to install a 12' X 36' prefabricated equipment
building near the base of the antenna. The proponent is intending
to locate the antenna tower and equipment building within the front
yard setback area of property located within a PID, Planned
- Industrial zoning district at 5600 Lincoln Drive. The U.S. West
New Vector Group is applying for the following variances to obtain
an permit for their request:
1. A 23 foot height variance to allow an antenna tower to
exceed the maximum allowable antenna height of 75 feet.
2. A 43 foot front yard setback variance to allow the
proposed antenna tower to encroach into the front yard
setback area. The required front yard setback for,the
PID district is 50 feet or building height whichever is
greater,.
3. A 16 foot front yard setback variance to allow an
equipment building to be located within 34 feet of the
front yard property boundary.
Issues and Analysis
Surrounding Land Use. The following adjacent land use are
proximate to the subject site:
North: Property to the north of the subject site is zoned planned
industrial district and is the location of the Edina Business
Center. Property located northeast of the site in question
consists of the nine mile creek wildlife area and single family
homes zoned R -1, single family residential zoning.district.
South: Property located south of the subject property is zoned
planned industrial district and consists of two industrial use
buildings.
East: Property located east of the subject,site is zoned R -1,
single family residential zoning district and consists of the nine
mile creek wildlife area and single family homes beyond. Property
'to the southeast of the subject site is zoned R =2, double dwelling
unit district and consists of two family side by -side housing
units.
West: Property located to the west of the subject site consists
of the highway 169 right -of -way, the American Fish and Seafood
building, and the PHP building and parking ramp.
Impact:. The proposed antenna would be visible from all
aforementioned properties. The utility building would be visible
only from the property zoned PID district to the south.
Zoning Issues: The applicant has stated the particular site
location is dictated by market demand of cellular phone users and
engineering constraints. Basically an antenna site is chosen based
on the following criteria:
1. The area chosen must be between a 1/2 mile to one mile
away from other cellular antennas within the system.
(approximately).
2. The area chosen must be of compatible land forms and
appropriate elevations so as not to interfere with
coverage area.
3. The area chosen should be compatibly zoned for the use.
4. The area chosen must be available for a reasonable
purchase price or lease option.
The applicant has chosen the site in question based on the
previously mentioned criteria. An agreeable combination of those
circumstances has determined the subject site the most "ideal
location" for their purposes. Staff submits however,•that strict
enforcement of the ordinance requirements would not cause undue
hardship because of circumstances unique to the property. Instead
it appears that circumstances for the variance request have been
created by the very nature of the cellular telephone business.
In addition, it is evident that an antenna tower would visually
impact neighboring property owners and may alter the residential
character of the surrounding R -1 and R -2 neighborhoods. The
particular use as described would be allowed within the PID
district so it cannot be stated that the ordinance does not allow
the "reasonable use" of the property for antenna purposes.
It should be noted that there are currently two competing cellular
telephone companies in the metro area. Both of these cellular
telephone companies have had substantial increases in their
customer base over the past few years. Increases in the number of
users translates into the need for additional antenna towers for
both companies. As such, approval of the variance' request would
set a precedence for similar requests to come forward in -the
future. The Board should also consider that there are other
businesses that use antennas so the potential for requests would
not be limited.to cellular phone companies.
Variances: The following describe and analyze the submitted
variance requests:
Variance for structure height: All antenna towers are limited in
height to 75 feet in the PID district. In addition, all ground
towers in residential R -1 and R -2 zoning districts are limited to
50 feet in height. . Therefore, the proposed tower would be
approximately one third taller than those allowed in PID districts
and nearly fifty percent taller than those allowed in neighboring
R -1 and R -2 districts. Staff contends that.the variance for height
is excessive and would visually impact neighboring property owners.
Variance for setback of the tower: The applicant contends that the
required front yard setback for the tower is 50 feet. The zoning
ordinance states that front yard setbacks must be maintained at 50
feet or building height which ever is greater. Staff contends that
the building height setback requirement was adopted to insure that
taller structures would have less impact on surrounding properties.
Staff contends that the antenna should technically be setback 98
feet (structure height) from the front yard property boundary.
Staff submits that a 43 foot front yard setback variance is
excessive and defeats the purpose of reducing the visual impact of
taller structures. In addition, staff has not identified a
hardship demonstrated by the property that would support the
location of the tower in the front yard setback area.
Variance for setback of the equipment building. The equipment
building would be screened from view from all sides with the
exception of the south facade, which faces a PID use.. A similar
front yard setback variance had been granted for the building to
the south.,. Staff could support the front yard setback request for
the equipment building based on the precedent set by the building
setback to the south and based on the minimal impact the building
would have on surrounding properties, however, a hardship is not
recognized for said location.
Conclusion: Staff recommends denial of the height and setback
variances for the antenna tower and equipment building due to the
following existing conditions:
1. The applicant has not sufficiently demonstrated "that the_
property could not be put to reasonable use without
approval of this particular variance request. Conditions
for requiring a variance are due to the nature of the
cellular telephone business and not by conditions present
on the 'site.
2. The antenna tower height is excessive and would have a
negative visual impact on surrounding properties.
3. A precedent would be established if the variances were to
be approved allowing similar request to be submitted.
Staff acknowledges the needs of the applicant and their desire to
provide improved cellular telephone service and would suggest
examining an ordinance amendment to address these issues.
1
AMERICAN
& SEAFOi
SMETANA COURT
PARKING RAMP
CZZD
AREA PLAN
POND
I
m
----------
0 25 100 500
RESIDENTIAL
EDINA BUSINESS
:TR.
PARKING
WETLANDS & BRUSH
tl I PROPOSEEr
$600 BUILDING MONOPOLE I
EQUIP. iBUILDINPI
SITE PLAN: SHEET #2 1
TRUCK DOCKS f/
PARKING r� I i
j
1
T
5700 LINCOLN
DRIVE
\5 LA
MONTH
(D
5720 LINCOLN DRIVE
3
5700 LINCOLN DRIVE
PARKING
5600 LINCOLN DRIVE
(� TO EDINA BUSINESS CENTEit
PROPOSED
MONOPOLE,
l
Lam". !•ter i� 1---r a 1' [�
LOADING DOCKS EQUIP. BLDG.
PARKING
5720 LINCOLN DRIVE
NORTH
SI'D'E PLAN
1 zs s0 200
OFFICE TOWER .
y PROPOSED
P H P COMPLEX — - - 5600 BUILDING - - MONOPOLE
.REA SEC"''TON A - A
WkTLAkDS ddUSH
3
I1 �,
� L�1
1
DASHED INDICATES APPROX. HEIGHT
OF TREES AND BRUSH
5608 RESIDENCE
DIRlOTIOMAL AMTEMMAs
PBOVOSeD
MONOPOLE
�I�,., II
EEISTDIO BOLL DING EIBM
EDJIP. BLDG.
SITE PLAN
SOUTH ELEVATION
Locam.
MINHY 169 -XT
5600 LINCOLN DRIVE
EDINA. MINNESOTA
...JCN wrc va iee�
LDADEeD BODA ITTr•l • ._
�I��II/EST
NEWVECIOH GROUP. INC.
U.S. WEST NEWVECTOR GROUP, NC.
:RI
THE CA
6NN 4R7tl1
DWG le0.901 M,
pvI ooa � nn 1" • �
M
• LANDSCAPING PLAN
w"m F. _w-c
- n
z
0
V
Z
J
1f
1
Plant Material
amm I
w.r N.
on
eesryw
I'3
� IOiG`�Eiel1EP
oad.
�
ca�e� �rurrav�
"
2
!�� 6RtiN 9talGi
:� , b'
D8
�IGFA f0F�6N6
Z "
�!lQNnf+l� GfIO
Z"
bb
-..
}�i 6nOND¢IPT
GRAY, PLANT, MOOTY, MOOTY & BENNETT, P.A.
INCLUDING THE FORMER FIRM OF HARSTAD & RAINBOW
HAROLD G. CANT 11887 -1973) �
HENRY W. H AV E R STOC K 1 1894 -1977) 3400 �ry� CITY CENTER
ER
FRANKLIN D. GRAY 11904 -1990)
FRANK W. PLANT. JR.
JOHN W. MOOTY
MELVIN R. MOOTY
SHEFFIELD WEST
RUSSELL M. BENNETT
CLINTON A. SCHROEDER
C. ELAINE HARSTAD
EDWARD J. CALLAHAN, JR.
JAMES S. SIMONSON
RICHARD N. FLINT
CURTIS D. FORSLUND
MAC LAY R.HYDE
BRUCE D. GRUSSING
C. STEVEN WILSON
JOHN S. CROUCH
DAVID T. BENNETT
EDWIN C. CARPENTER
LINDLEY S. BRANSON
JOHN W. THIEL
ALBERT ANDREWS. JR.
NOEL P. MULLER
DOUGLAS R. RAINBOW
FRANKLIN C. JESSE, JR.
DAVID L. WHITE
BRUCE E. KIERN AT
DANIEL R. SHULMAN
MICHAEL R. CUNNINGHAM
ROBERT P. LARSON
THOMAS L. JOHNSON
RICHARD A. MOORE, JR.
WILLIAM L. KILLION .
ELIZABETH W. NORTON
JOHN E. BROWER
THOMAS DARLING
JOHN M. NICHOLS
MARTHA A. VAN DE VEN
MARY BETH BRODY
EDWIN R, HOLMES
DAVID N. MOOTY
RICHARD A. HACKETT
WILLIAM D. KLEIN
SUSAN L. SEGAL
NICHOLAS N. NIERENGARTEN
JOHN L. KRENN
STEPHEN R. EIOE
JOHN D. GIUDICESSI, JR,
KATHLEEN S. TILLOTSON
MICHAEL C. FLOM
DAVID C. BAHLS
PHILLIP BOHL
THIRTY THREE SOUTH SIXTH STREET
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 -3796
TELEPHONE 612.343.1800
FAX 612.333.0066
TWX 910.576.2778
DIRECT DIAL 343 -2838
February 5, 1991
Edina Zoning Board of Appeals and
Adjustments
Attn: Jackie Hoogenakker
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Re: Application by U.S. New Vector Group
Case File B -91 -2
Gentlemen:
5616
site
heari
I am the owner o f
Parkwood Lane wh i
and, therefore,
ng scheduled for,
the sin
ch lies
I have re
Thursday,
gle -famil
within 25
ceived a
Februar
JAMES F CARROLL
ROBERT E. HARDING
LAURA J. HEIN
MYRON L. FRANS
ERIK T. SALVESON
RICHARD G. BRAMAN
PENNY M. TIBKE
NANCY QUATTLEBAUM BURKE
WILLIAM J. FISHER
VIRGINIA S. SCHUBERT
GEORGE R. WOOD
TAMARA HJELLE OLSEN
LYNN B. NOLAND
NANCY ROETMAN MENZEL
OUENTIN R. WITTROCK
ROBERTJ.MCREAVY
DEAN A. LEDOUX
GREGORY R.MERZ
BRIAN B. SCHNELL
WADE ANDERSON
ARTHUR W. DICKINSON
LAURA J. SCHOENSAUER
VALERIE BOLES WAGONER
RICK E. KUBLER
TIMOTHY M. BURKE
y residence 1
0 feet of the
notice of a
y 7,. 1991.
BARBARA E. TRETHEWAY
TROY A. BADER
EDWARD A- GARVEY
MARA R. THOMPSON
MARK E. MULHOLLAM
NANCYJ. MILLER
STACY A. LEVIN
SUSAN DECKER LENCZEWSKI
CHARLOTTE. A. KIMBALL
GINA B. SAUER
WILLIAM R. PECK
JOHN G.'SHULMAN
TERRY M. WALCOTT
OFCOUNSEL
ROBERT L. HELLAND
D. JAMES NIELSEN
DANIELS. VENTRES. JR.
ROBERT A. STEIN
DAVID M. COYNE
BETSY B.BAKER
ocated at
subject
public
The purpose of this letter is to advise the Edina Zoning
Board of Appeals and Adjustments that it is my view of
applicable Minnesota case law that the variances requested by
U.S. West New Vector Group may not be lawfully granted and,
therefore, the subject application should be denied.
In this regard, it is clear that
variances cannot be granted unless th
ordinance results in a hardship and,
report in this matter dated February
evidence that the application of the
circumstance which is recognizable in
JSC:jmh
3808x
, under Minnesota
e application of
as is clear from
7, 1991, there i s
ordinance create
the law as a ha
Very truly yours,
o h n S�.0 r 0 ud h
law,
the
the staff
no
s any
rdship.
N'71
Gk's . GL >,y� yl.�tG� z �' •
� / Zd ✓J�'r- 2c',•)( ��' �, . �i ^. L.�i�jvY` -CL �.G•Y, � L' `-� ?Gs 2c'�Z�'C �ci�'7'L
� � - GL� -C'K l � L�'L � lj -CQ-4% � /jY ✓r'� �� � <2t-- y.-� `> �' ✓
GYj / Q -41wP '-�T �1GCG G�/7YLGCC�� ""L 7•--
To-
V17
v
✓yam ��.e�- �^ >> -ze��� u�`� -- l�
�
Tv,Le��,
c.0 �f we
Al
c C.
�4���
�aUH•c+ � i�L � � 5��/3 �
c� � N, .
Aj
L4,
If
kl
LL// �
,� -S - QI
-- - - - _ lei � ���/ r'.G� �- �d�?"✓1''aM_G ; ,��,�
� Cv►')1 liJ- 'u,�?�",s�� 2'Y� ,�,,�; � ,tit; �t. �}"�o�l «.
J
c��PCUL V ems; Lj a- (j- e .
cc. rr2cc
C (, Zoe
�YY�� • ri� S'71'� -4.� � �'�- C�- c�iL�� -r G � �Y�- R�L��'
v "r a,ve, v a.ea, y-4-
. YY� P coo
vim, M "q s S- y 36
S
Case i3— 9/ _ 2-
.
Gv-e Cc/�..er cam- a,,
�
c�-e
y ,
LEVANDER, ZOTALEY, VANDER LINDEN & RYDLAND
A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
i. LAWYERS
720 NORTHSTAR WEST
625 MAROUETTE AVENUE
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
(612) 339 -6841
BERNHARD W. LEVANDER
BYRON L. ZOTALEY
JAMES G. VANDER LINDEN
ROBERT H. RYDLAND
DAVID C. WULFF
ELIZABETH R. BOYD _
Mr. Fred S. Richards
7225 Fleetwood Drive
Edina, Minnesota 55435
Ms. Jane L. Paulus
4617 Moorland Avenue
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Mr. Glenn L. Smith
5717 Susan Avenue
Edina, Minnesota 55435
February 21, 1991
Ms. Peggy Kelly
22 Circle West
Edina, Minnesota 55436
Mr. Bernard G. Rice
4801 Hilltop Lane
Edina, Minnesota 55424
- RE: Parkwood Knolls Ten Story Cellular Phone Tower
Variance Case File No. B -91--2
Dear Mayor and City Council Persons:
LEGAL ASSISTANTS
LORENA M. MITCHELL
R. MARTIN TUZINSKI
FAX (612) 339 -5765
ABA /NET: ABA1842
I am writing you today after having met with Planning Department
staff this morning regarding the request of U.S. West to build the
10 -story Cellular Phone Tower just across the street from the
Parkwood Knolls residential neighborhood of Edina.
I am writing you to uphold the unanimous denial of the Petition for
Variances made by the Edina Zoning Board of Appeals and Adjustments
on February 7, 1991.
It is my understanding that the tower's proponents have scheduled"
their appeal of this matter to come before you at 7:00 p.m. on
Monday, March 4, 1991.
I am writing you, not only on my own behalf, but also at the
request and on the behalf of my neighbors, Mr. and Mrs. Adam
Stanzak, 5600 Parkwood Lane; Mr. and Mrs. Edward E. Powers, 5500
Parkwood Lane; and Mr. and Mrs. Stanley G. Petzel, 5509 Parkwood
Lane. We have resided at our present addresses for 17 years, 11
years, 27 years, and 15 years respectively.
None of us have recieved to date any notification whatsoever of the
prior City proceedings before the Zoning Board of Appeals and
Adjustments: If we had known, we certainly would have been at the
prior meetings and voiced our opposition to the proposal as our
homes are directly affected.
February 21, 1991
Paste Two
The proposed tower stands as tall as a 10 -story building. Its
location directly behind the Stanzak home, will put if visually
into all of our living rooms.and visually pollutes not only the use
and enjoyment of our interiors but also our outdoor family,
recreation-areas.
The Stanzak's did receive an invitation by the proponent to a
private meeting which I also attended at the City Hall on January
25. At that time the proponent was provided with the names and
addresses of affected property owners, including myself, the Powers
and the Petzel's as well as others. We were assured by the
proponent and its lawyers that we would all receive timely notices
as to official hearings with the City. We are all disappointed
that the proponent obviously never followed through on this simple
commitment.
In any event, I think it is important to note that those who
attended the private meeting on January 25, were unanimously
opposed to the building of this tower across the street from
Parkwood Knolls. We were told by the proponents representatives
that for technical reasons they needed to build a new tower some
place in the area of the Crosstown and 169/18. It was pointed out
to them that more than 75% of the surrounding .land area to that
intersect was commercial and industrial. When questioned why they
had chosen a site, which was just across the street from one of
Edina's finest residential neighborhoods, the answer which we were
given was that no other commercial site would have them. When
asked why they felt that such a visual pollution of our residential
neighborhood should be accepted when the majority of-commercial
property owners had rejected them, they had no answer. When
specific suggestions were given to them as to other possible
commercial sites in the general area which they seek, their
response was that they had not thought of those sites or made any
inquiries into them. They left the distinct impression that they
had worked out such a sweet financial deal with the property owner
at 5600 Lincoln Drive, that they really had little or no concern
about the negative impact they would create for the homeowner at
5600 Parkwood Lane or any of the other residential properties which
would be negatively impacted.
I think the bottom line of all this is very clear and. can be
summarized as follows:
1) The tower proponent simply has not done its homework. It
has many potential alternate sites, that would have
little or no impact on Parkwood Knolls or any other
residential neighborhood of Edina.
2) The tower proponent seeks to build its structure more
than twice the height that would otherwise be legally
.permissible in an R1 or 2 setting.
February 21, 1991
Paste Three
3) The tower proponent is not not satisfied with the 7 1/2-
story limitation which it gains by stepping across the
street. It insists on going to 10- stories.
4) The tower proponent seeks not only a height variance to
accomplish its purpose, but also a setback variances.
Instead of proposing to build their tower on the Westerly
end of 5600 Lincoln Drive, thus placing it at the
furthest possible distance away from the residential
neighborhood and closest to 169, it seeks to place it on
the Easterly end of the property at the closest point to
the residential neighborhood and then requests a second
variance to come even closer than would normally be
allowed.
This type of visual pollution should never be tolerated in any
community which prides itself in its residential nature, visual
amenities and quality of life. The homeowners of Parkwood Knolls
have gone to great expense over the years to comply with many
ordinances focused on eliminating visual pollution. What purpose
does it serve to have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars over
the years to bury our electric and telephone line services in the
ground in order so as to get rid of overhead wires and poles only
to now come back and build a 10 -story tower which will be visible
over blocks and blocks of Parkwood Knolls?
Your unanimous vote unanimously dening of the proponents Petition
for Variances is requested.
Very truly yours,
Byron L. Zotaley
5504 Parkwood Lane
Edina, Minnesota 55436
933 -5333
BLZ /lau /
cc: Edina Planning Department v
Mr. and Mrs. Edward E. Powers, 5500 Parkwood Lane
Mr. and Mrs. Rudy Luther, 5608'Parkwood Lane
Mr. 'and Mrs. Stanley G. Petzel, 5509 Parkwood Lane
Mr. and Mrs. Adam P. Stanzak, 5600 Parkwood Lane
Dr. and Mrs. Ekren Gozum, 6616 Parkwood Road
Mr. and Mrs. Mario Bognanno, 6620 Parkwood Road
Mr. and Mrs. William G. Mueller, 6617 Parkwood Road
Mr. and Mrs'. James L. Phelps, 6612 Parkwood Road.
Mr. and Mrs. Andrew E. Montgomery, 6628 Parkwood Road
Mr. and Mrs. Edward J. Kocourek, 6636 Parkwood Road
Dr. and Mrs. William Dorsey, 6624 Parkwood Road
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the City'of Edina is essentially fully developed; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is of the belief that there will be an ever increasing
demand for towers, antennas, and dish antennas (as defined in Ordinance No. 812 of
the City) to be erected in the City for cellular telephones and other kinds of
communication, with results that may be detrimental, in many respects, to the
value of adjoining properties and to the quality.and character of the affected
neighborhood and the City as a whole; and
WHEREAS, the City Council believes that the ordinances and Comprehensive Plan of
the City may not be adequate to guide future erection, location, size and use of
such towers, antennas and dish antennas, without detriment to the City or its
citizens, and further believes that it is desirable to review the plans and
ordinances of the City to determine if any changes or amendments should be made to
the procedures and criteria for approving and allowing erection, including
location, size and use of such towers, antennas, and dish antennas in the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City staff is hereby authorized and
directed to conduct studies of the applicable plans and ordinances of the City,
and to give information to, and make recommendations to, the City Council relative
to the need and desirability, if any, for adopting or amending the plans and
ordinances of the City relative to restricting, regulating or controlling the
erection, location, size and use of such towers, antennas, and dish antennas
within the City, and if needed or desired, the terms and conditions of.such
restrictions, regulations and controls.
ADOPTED this 4th day of March, 1991.
el
A.
o e �,
>1rJ. ` �o REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
KENNETH ROSLAND
Agenda Item # -IL.
D.
From:
KRIS AAKER
Consent
; i
Information Only
❑
i Date:
MARCH 4, 1991
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
C-91-1, REQUEST TO
T
To Council ,
RECONSIDER CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT, HENNEPIN
Action
T
Motion
COUNTY LIBRARY.- 7001
YORK AVENUE SOUTH
I
Resolution i
Ordinance.
j
I_!
Discussion
Recommendation:
Info/Background-
Representatives of Southdale Library have asked to appear before
the Council to request that the Council reconsider issuance of a
Conditional Use Permit denied by the Council on February 19, 1991.
The Zoning ordinance provides for Council reconsideration upon a
3/5 favorable vote following "evidence of a change of facts or
circumstances affecting the proposed use ".
Attached are revised plans submitted by the county supporting their
request. The plans illustrate the addition of a "drive -thru" book
drop off, and a revised parking lay -out which eliminates parking
within the required 20 foot parking setback area.
02/26/91 08:92 FAX 612 541 7984 DDO
FTPROPERTY MANAGEMENT
A -2208 Government Center
HENNEPIN Minneapols, Minnesota 55487 -0228
LFIJ
February 26, 1991
City of Edina
4801.West Fiftieth Street
Edina, Minnesota 55425
Attention: City Council
Re: Southdale Library Conditional Use Permit
Members of the Council:
As attachments to this letter, we - are offering certain changes to our
original permit and request consideration for approval during the'March 4
meeting. The primary change is a plan to alleviate book return
Inconveniences. We have also included the parking scheme that avoids the
variance requested in the - original submittal.
The new architectural solution has a drive -up book drop included as a part
of a new book receiving room. This new 450 square foot room within the
footprint of the library is located 'at the existing night book deposit.
Besides the added drive -up convenience for the public this space will help
to support the increase in circulated. volumes anticipated because of - the
enlarged facility. We trust that these ideas are looked upon favorably and
in the mutual interest of the community and the library.
With both parking schemes now presented we remain dedicated to our original
Scheme A but in the interest of time and project priorities we will defer to
the wish of council vote, be it Scheme or SchAMg., j.
Sincerely,
Raymo d f. John , Architect - Project Manager
Property Management Department
B. Thiede
Area Library Division
Fennepin County Library
HENNEPIN COUNTY
an equal opporfunlfy emplover
Tod 1W9W Al 2L3d021d Ala NN3H WK0se0 T6. 92 -63J
12002
Transmittal Letter
Fax
Mail
Messenger
Overnight
UPS
Other Ve1 wPr,
To:
Drec,r r pt F'►�hn�r�
C, b, o-f EGl iv) ok
tdina , MN 55424
From: e-�-F KielIe>�
Project Name: ',:L�QU th6i2l 1P. U1 b-f0A f 0
MS &R
Meyer, Scherer & Rockcastle, Ltd.
Architects
325 Second Avenue North
Minneapolis, MN 55401 -1601
Phone: 612 - 375 -0336
Fax: 612- 342 -2216
Date:
Time:
Fax:
Phone:
21�eb-Ii1611
No. of Pages:
Project No.: 0) D 34
Copies
Date
Description
1212.010
}-
�.•2�•�1
-
&
Iz.
1 ,
1= c� t Door Finn
1
2 2b q
L&e.-(- - rorr, He)nn C+1 rt: rewns,'Atfol ho
S of Co ml • L/I ile4nm t r6 j"est
Copies to-2-( F) kO V, 01 NE Dorr,e r
Remarks:
�Qr Co► -,5� ol,�ca -ham b� fie, Cot)
Mp)vc- -, 4 � lalm
Cov►n C/i 1 o n
o e ":.' 71
ch
��A
��
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
From: GORDON L. HUGHES
ASSISTANT MANAGER
Date: MARCH 4, 1991
- Subject:
SALE OF STRONG BEER IN
RESTAURANTS HOLDING WINE
LICENSES
Recommendation:
Info /Background:
Agenda Item # III-
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
❑
To Council
Action ❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
EE
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
On March 4, 1991, the City Council will conduct a Public Hearing
concerning the sale of strong beer in restaurants which hold wine
licenses. In accordance with your request, we have published a
legal notice concerning this hearing in our official newspaper.
In addition, the Edina Sun Current published an article on
February 20, 1991, concerning the March 4, 1991, hearing (copy of
article attached). We have also provided notice of this hearing
to the Edina Ministerial Association, the Edina Public Schools
and the Edina Chamber of Commerce.
If the Council wishes to authorize the sale of strong beer in
restaurants holding wine licenses, it should direct staff to
prepare the necessary amendment to Edina Ordinance #902. A draft
of this Ordinance amendment can be prepared and submitted for
your consideration at the March 18, 1991, Council meeting or at a
future Council meeting of your choosing. The Council, if it
wished, could consider the adoption of this ordinance amendment
without the need for further public hearings. Attached to this
(over)
Report /Recommendation
March 4, 1991
Page Two
memo is a November 28, 1990, letter from Tom Erickson. This
letter provides a general overview of the laws relative to the
sale of beer, wine, and intoxicating liquor. Also attached is a
letter dated February 26, 1991, from Bravo!, 3910 W. 50th Street,
which supports amending City ordinances to permit the sale of
strong beer. At this writing, we have received no other written
correspondence or telephone calls concerning the March 4, 1991,
hearing.
DORSEY & WHITNEY
A PA— K.aHI► INCLDD -0 PROF.Sl.ONIL I. 21T1ON!
350 PARE AVENUE
NEW TORE. NEW YORK 10022
=200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST
201 FIRST AVENUE, S. W., SUITE 340
212)415 -9200
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 -1498
ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 55902
507)288 -3156
1330 CONNECTICUT AVENUE. N. W.
(6I2) 340 -2600
WASHINGTON. D. C. 20036
TELEX 29-0603
(202) 837 -0700
1200 FIRST INTERSTATE CENTER
-
FAX (612) 340-2868
BILLINGS, MONTANA 59103
3 GRACECHURCH STREET
(406)252-3800
LONDON EC3V OAT, ENGLAND
44 -71- 929 -3334
38, RUE
- TWMAS S, ZRICKSON
201 DAVIDSON BUILDING
75009 PARIS. PRANCE
IS. FRANC
GREAT FALLS, MONTANA 59401
33-1- 42-66 -59-48
(g12) 340-2M
l
(406) 727 -3632
45, RUE DE THEVES
-
B -1040 BRUSSELS. BELGIUM
127 EAST FRONT STREET
32- 2-238 -78 -11
MISSOULA, MONTANA 59802
' (406) 721-6025
November 28, 1990
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland
City Manager
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Re: On -Sale of Intoxicating Liquor in the City
Dear Mr. Rosland:
The Edina Chamber of Commerce has asked that the City adopt an
ordinance authorizing the holder of an on -sale wine license, who is also licensed to
sell 3.2 beer at on -sale, and whose gross receipts are at least 60% attributable to the
sale of food, to sell intoxicating malt liquor (strong beer) at on -sale without an
additional license. Such an ordinance is allowed by Minnesota Statutes,
Section 340A.404, subdivision 5(b). As I previously advised the Council, there is no
definition of "intoxicating malt liquor" in the state statute (Chapter 340A). There is,
however, a definition of "intoxicating liquor" which includes all beverages,
including malt beverages containing more than 3.2 percent of alcohol by weight
(strong beer). Though not defined, I am `of the opinion, that the reference to
"intoxicating malt liquor" is restrictive enough to permit under such an ordinance
only the sale of strong beer and not other kinds of "intoxicating liquor."
The Council desires to hold a public hearing on the matter. Based on
my conversations with you I thought it advisable to give you this letter setting forth
some provisions of the applicable Minnesota state statutes relative to the issuance of
on -sale intoxicating liquor licenses (and not. just strong beer licenses), and elections
required in connection therewith in case the topic comes up.
(over)
A
DORSEY & WHIT`: EY
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland
November 28, 1990
Page 2
Allowing, by ordinance, the holder of an on -sale wine license, who also
holds an on -sale 3.2 beer license and whose gross receipts are at least 60% attributable
to the sale of food, to sell strong beer, does not require that there be any special
hearing or any special election prior to, or as a condition to, adoption of the
ordinance. In such case, the statute does not require that any license be actually
issued for the sale of strong beer; the statute authorizes the sale of strong.beer simply
by the holding of other licenses (i.e .', on -sale wine, on -sale 3.2 beer and food licenses).
If the City desires to do more than adopt an ordinance under .
Section 340A.404, subd. 5(b), then the so-called "split liquor" procedure is established
by Section 340A.601. This allows the issuance of licenses for the on -sale of
intoxicating liquor to hotels, clubs and restaurants, while yet allowing the City to
operate its municipal liquor stores. The statutory definitions of hotels, clubs and
restaurants is attached. The City may impose restrictions and regulations in
addition to those in the statute.
The issuance of licenses under the "split liquor" option is not allowed,
however, until "authorized by the voters of the city voting on the question at a
special election called for that purpose." There are no provisions in the statute as to
how the election is to be conducted or what kind of vote is required for
authorization. However, Minnesota Statutes, Section 205.10 does provide for city
special elections. It allows special elections on any question on which the voters are
authorized by law to pass judgment. This would presumably include the split
liquor option. The statute further provides that the special election may be ordered
by the city council on its own motion or, if it's a question that has not been
submitted to the voters within the previous six months, upon a petition signed by
the number of voters equal to 20% of the votes cast at the last municipal general
election. The statute is not clear, but seems to say that the question is carried with
only a majority in its favor. Election officials for the special election are to be the
same as for the most recent municipal general election unless changed according to
law, and otherwise a special election shall be conducted and returns made in the
manner provided for the municipal general election. However, even if the citizens
vote for the split- liquor licensing, the issuance of licenses is still at the discretion of
the City Council and is to be done pursuant to a duly adopted ordinance.
DOBSEY 4c WHITNEY
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland
November 28, 1990
Page 3
I trust this letter is responsive to your inquiry. If there are any further
questions or if I can be of any further help with respect to this matter, please let me
know.
• Very truly yours,
f ,
Thomas S. Erickson
TSE:kks
(over)
Subd. 7. Club. "Club" is an incorporated organization organized under
the laws of the state for civic, fraternal, social, or business purposes,_ for
intellectual improvement, or for the promotion of sports, or a congressionally
chartered veterans' organization, which:
(1) has more than 50 members;
(2) has owned or rented a building or space in a building for more than one
year that is suitable. and adequate for the accommodation of its members;
(3) is directed by a board of directors, executive committee, or other similar
body chosen by the members at a meeting held for that purpose. No
member, officer, agent, or employee shall receive any profit from the distribu-
tion or sale of beverages to the members of the.club, or their guests, beyond a
reasonable salary or wages fixed and voted each year by the governing body.
Subd. 13. Hotel. "Hotel" is an establishment where food and lodging are
regularly furnished to transients and which has:
(1) a resident proprietor or manager;
(2) a dining room serving the general public at tables and having facilities
for seating at least 30 guests at one time; and
(3) guest rooms in the following minimum numbers: '
11 O.L
in second class eities, 25; '
Subd. 23. Restaurant. "Restaurant" is an establishment, other than a
motel, under the control of a single proprietor or manager, where meals are
cgularly served at tables to the general public, and having seating capacity
for guests in the following minimum numbers:
(a) Fift! Blass e'7vs. ........ so
(b) Second and third class cities and statutory 00
cities of over 10,0
population ..... .......:....................... ......30
,
of L Woods, d st &OW-6 eetlnliee
In the case of classes (b) and (c) above, the governing body of a city or
county may prescribe a higher minimum number. In fourth class cities and
statutory cities under 10,000 population, minimum seating requirements are
those prescribed by the governing body of the city.
Sul
scrib
Su
ferm,
NotN
Antonio Cecconi's
An
n � R- - A�V=-- C %)
=9=
R i s t o r a n t e Italia no
3910 West 50th Street • Edina, MN 55424 • (612) 922 -5815
TO: City Council, City of Edina
RE: Proposal for strong beer
February 26, 1991
In response to the public hearing March 4 I submit the following
letter.
I strongly approve of the proposed on -sale of strong beer for
restaurants already licensed for 3.2 and wine. What we would
gain from this is not so much additional sales but an increased
positive perception from current and potential customers. We
have lost many potential customers for banquets and eat -in business
when they realized strong beer was not available. It frankly has
been an enigma to think we can sell a glass or bottle of wine
but not "real" beer. Try to explain that to a customer!
In regards-.to concerns about serving alcohol, in nearly six .
years of having a 3.2 license and nearly two years with a wine
license I cannot recall one incident of dealing with a customer
who may have been inebriated. The vast majority of people want
to compliment their Italian pasta with a glass of wine or their
pizza with a beer. I honestly cannot see any harm out of this
proposal - only good in creating a positive atmosphere for
restaurant businesses in Edina.
Sincerely,
l � �
Antonio Cecconi
(over)
Council could
Mow sale of
strong beer
Hearing is set
By Mary Durben
Should Edina restaurants that
now serve wine be allowed to
serve strong beer — beer con-
taining more than 3.2 percent
alcohol?
That question will be discuss-
ed in a public hearing at 7 p.m.
March 4 in the City Hall Council
Chambers.
Testimony at the hearing will
help the Edina City Council
decide whether to take advan-
tage;of a new state law giving ci-
ty eouncils authority to extend
that privilege to wine license
holders. Food would still have to
account for at least 60 percent of
the restaurants' total sales.
The Edina Chamber of Com-
merce has asked the council to
make the change so that
restaurants can serve imported
and specialty beers, which have
gained popularity in recent
years. That would improve their
ability to compete with
restaurants in neighboring com-
munities, the Chamber
maintains.
In the past, requests to extend
liquor sales have been very con -
troversial and have been settled
by referendums.
This time, however, the coun-
cil members have said they
would prefer to avoid the cost of
a referendum, but they would
not decide the matter without
public comment.
Residents are being encourag-
ed to comment at the public
hearing, and written comments
will also be accepted.
Virginia Bodine, executive
director of the Chamber, said
the sale of wine in restaurants
was overwhelmingly approved
by votes in a 1984 advisory
H>FARIMG: To page 2.A
.: , . ,6
PUBLISHED IN THE EDINA SUN CURRENT - February..20, 1991
Hearing
Flom previous page
referendum.
"People are not going to ob-
ject to restaurants serving im-
Ported beer," she said. "The
Chamber feels this is a good
time to ask because the state
has approved it."
Bodine said the Chamber will
try to correct some common
misperceptions about strong
beer.
"People's perception is that
strong beer is 6 percent alcohol,
but it's really about 4 percent,"
she said. "Wine is 14 percent
alcohol, so a glass of wine is
really the equivalent of a bottle
of strong beer."
Bodine said restaurants will
.be able to meet the percentage
of sales requirement easily;
since sales are currently about
98 Percent food and 2 percent
wine.
People who order liquor at a
restaurant must order a food,
and a meal costs more than a
glass of wine, she said. And
many customers don't order
alcoholic beverages.
Bodine noted that the 1984 ad-
visory referendums, which was
held in conjunction with a
Presidential election, on -sale
wine licensing got more votes,
than a mayoral candidate who
was nursing unopposed. Wine
sales were approved by a vote of
19,697 to 6,141.
"I'm convinced that if strong
beer had been on the ballot, it
would have been approved,"
Bodine said.
An earlier referendum on
split -liquor sales fared less well,
however. In February 1975.
residents voted 4,233 to 2,028 not
to allow the sale of hard liquor in
restaurants and 4,160 to 2,024 not
to allow liquor sales after noon
on Sunday.
Bodine said that referendum,
which was supported by the
Radisson South, was ill -
conceived because it was hel
conjunction with a school bM
election, which typically drW
few voters. People who were
motivated to vote on the liquor
issues generally were opposed to
the questions on the ballot.
Voters in . 1961 defeated the
licensing of off -sale liquor stores
by 5,015 to 183 votess.
If the council preferred to
have a referendum on the
strong -beer issue, Bodine said it
would have to wait until the next
presidential election in 1992.
The Chamber would have to
raise money for the effort, she
said — the business community
paid the cost of the 1984 balloting
and would be expected to do so
again. And they would need the
high voter tuunout of a presiden-
tial contest.
Bodine said Tour de France
restaurant brought the new law
to the Chamber's attention, and
the Chamber board of directors
passed a resolution to support
the change.
04 March 1991
Edina City Council
This written comment, solicited in Mary Durben's
Edina Sun - Current article of 20 February'91, is
to state our hope that the Council will not let
strong beer be sold in the City.
Council approval sends a message to our youth,
that alcohol is "OK " ... a message that need be
carefully assessed in this day of substance abuse.
Respectfully submitted,
Y-,U- � �wx_oe�
Lee and Bob McLane
4527 Arden Avenue
Edina, MN 55424 -1116
926 -9432
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE 4 March, 1991 AGENDA ITEM V. A.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Backhoe Attachment for Case Skid Loader
Company Amount of Quote or &d
1• Case Power & Equipment $ 6,580.00
2• Case Power - Duluth 2. $ 8,279.00
3. ' 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Case Power & $ 6,580.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This is a attachment for the Case skid loader, Unit 25 -411.
The attaci:; :.c-,.;c is a small backhoe attachment for the equipment.
The funds for this purchase are from the - equipment replacement
fund.
A
- ignatur
The Recommended bid is
within budget not
Public Works - Streets
Rosland
ktllplJa.e1_
Finance Director
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Chuck Peterson, Liquor Stores
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5.000
DATE: 3/01/91 AGENDA ITEM V • B
Signature
The Recommended bid is, X
within budget not v
Liquor Stores
allin, Finance Director
V Manager
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Company _
Amount of Quote or &d
1. Sign Services Incorporated
1•$10,848.50
2. Lawrence Sign
2.'14,980.00
3. Universal Signs
3. 16,549.00
4.
4.
5:. =
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Sign Services Incorporated
GENERAL INFORMATION:
The preceding quotes are for an illuminated
awning for the Yorkdale
Liquor Store. The awning will be internally
lit and reflect our
new color scheme and liquor store logo. The
awning will provide
better lighting in front of the store for our
customers and make
the store more visible from York Avenue.
Signature
The Recommended bid is, X
within budget not v
Liquor Stores
allin, Finance Director
V Manager
o e Cn
lose
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Ken Rosland, Manager
From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERIC
Date: Ntarch 1, 1991
Subject: On -Sale Wine License and
On -Sale 3/2 Beer License
for Two Guys From Italy
Restaurant, 7459 France
Avenue So (Centennial La
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
VI-A
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Approval of issuance of an On -Sale Wine License and On -Sale 3.2 Beer License
to Two Guys From Italy restaurant at 7459 France Avenue South.
Info/Background-
The City has received applications for both an On -Sale Wine License and
an On -Sale 3.2 Beer License from Two Guys From Italy restaurant located at
7459 France Avenue South (Centennial Lakes), together with applications
for two Manager's licenses.
The applications have been reviewed by the Police, Health and Planning
Departments and the necessary investigations have been conducted. Memorandums
are attached from these departments in support of issuance of the On -Sale
Wine License. The departments have also approved issuance of the beer
license.
Letters in support of the licenses are also attached.
MW ,.
M E M O R A N D U M
9
TO: Kenneth E. Rosland
FROM: Craig G. Swanson
SUBJECT: On -Sale Wine License
DATE: February 22, 1991
The on -sale wine license application of the below - listed
establishment has been investigated in accordance with applicable
statutes and ordinances:
Two Guys From Italy
7495 France Avenue South
Edina, MN 55435
The findings of these investigations do not reveal information
that is contrary to the public interest for the purpose of
licensing.
Therefore, I recommend the Council move to approve the
application and issuance of an on -sale wine license for the
establishment conditioned upon approval by the State of
Minnesota, and instruct the City Clerk to forward the required
documents to the State of Minnesota for their approval.
r-
CRAIG 3. SWANSON
CHIE OF POLICE
CGS:nah
M E M 0 R U N D U M
TO: KENNETH ROSLAND, MANAGER
FROM: //Yy LLIOTT MARSTON, ASSISTANT SANITARIAN
SUBJECT: ON -SALE WINE LICENSE APPLICATION
DATE: MARCH 1, 1991
The on -sale wine license application for Two Guys From Italy, 7459 France
Avenue South, Edina, MN has been reviewed by the Health Department.
Our investigation of the premises finds that the subject restaurant complies
with the requirements of Ordinance No. 902 with respect to seating capacity,
food establishment license and appropriate storage and food handling space
which is not adversely impacted by the storage and service of wine.
I would recommend that the on -sale wine license be approved.
1
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: KENNETH ROSLAND, MANAGER
FROM: CRAIG LARSEN, PLANNER
SUBJECT: ON -SALE WINE LICENSE APPLICATION
DATE: MARCH 1, 1991
The on -sale wine application from Two Guys. From Italy, 7459 France Avenue South,
Edina, MN has been reviewed by the Planning Department.
The premises meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and I would recommend
approval of.the license application.
CITY OF �N,TE BEAR
POLICE
WWte Bear hake
RESPONSE 911
February 25, 1991
Frederick Richards, Mayor
City of Edina
4801 West 50th St.
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mr. Mayor:
I am writing on behalf of Daniel A. Sarno and Two Guys From
Italy restaurant. Two Guys From Italy is a well established
restaurant in White Bear Lake. It has held a liquor license
in our city since 1980. In 1989 Two Guys From Italy
began to sell strong beer rather than 3.2 beer. This change
had no adverse effects on the Police Dep'zrtment.
I hope this information is helpful. If I can be of further
assistance please don't hesitate to call.
Sincerely
Phi Ii J. Ma
Chief of Pol ce
4700 MILLER AVENUE • WHITE BEAR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55110 • 429 -8511
Cit y of White, Bear Lake
I�
4701 Highway 61, White Bear Lake, MN 55110
' Fax (612) 429 -8500 * Phone (612) 429 -8526
December 10, 1990
Mr. Frederick Richards, Mayor
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mayor Richards:
I am pleased to have been asked by Daniel. Sarno to serve as a reference in
support of his application for a liquor license in your community. I have
served on the City Council and as Mayor for the more than seven years that Mr.
Sarno has operated a restaurant in White Bear Lake and feel extremely comfort-
able in recommending favorable approval of his application in your city.
As owner and operator of Two Guys from Italy, Daniel has distinguished himself
not only as an excellent restauranteur, but also an outstanding busi- nessman in
our community. His restaurant *is one of the prides of our downtown area and
an example of how to do things right. To my knowledge the business has never__
had difficulty complying with State and local liquor laws. Further, the
business under Dan's management has been punctual in meeting all its.obliga-
tions and has contributed greatly to various causes within our community.
Besides all the formalities normally considered in reviewing a liquor license,
I_ might add that Dan's business is always filled with friendly workers and
they are renowned for serving some of the best Italian food in the region.
Please accept my sincere and unreserved recommendation for favorable consider-
ation of his liquor license.
J mJ
Sincerely,
oe���
Q3 �o Has
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From Francis Hoffman
City Engineer
Date: 4 March, 1991
Subject: Public Hearings
Sidewalks - Feasibility
Report & Set Hearing
Date
Recommendation:
Agenda Item *
VI - B -
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
7
To Council
Action
[0
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Set hearing date of March 18,-1991 or alternate date of April 1, 1991.
Info/Background-
The City of Edina has received three petitions for sidewalks in Edina. The
locations and estimated cost proposed for the sidewalks are as follows:
LOCATION COST
Wooddale Ave. (East Side) from W. 50th St. to W. 56th St. $ 147,330.40
W. 66th St. (North Side) from France Ave. to Southdale $ 40,480.00
Medical Building Driveway
Cornelia Dr. (West Side) from Cornelia School to W. 72nd St. $ 39,600.00
& W. 72nd St. (North Side) from Cornelia Dr. to Oaklawn Ave.
The proposed projects have been reviewed and are considered feasible. The
staff would suggest possible hearing dates of March 18, or April 1. The
Council may wish to discuss City -wide sidewalk plans and policy for funding
prior to the public hearings. If policy is to be discussed for the whole of
the City, staff would recommend that discussion occur on March 18th, with
the hearings to occur on April 1st, 1991.
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Ken Rosland
From: Janet Chandler and
David Velde
Date: Plarch 4, 1991
Subject: Solid waste
Collection Options
Agenda Item # vl.
c .
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr . Recommends
❑
To HRA
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
0
Discussion
Recommendation:
options for Council:
1. Set a date for a public hearing, as the first step in the organized
collection process, or
2. Direct staff to prepare a plan for a districting system, or
3. Take no action.
Info/Background-
on September 17, (copy of minutes attached) following a discussion on Edina
waste disposal systems and costs, Council asked for a follow -up staff
report after January 1, 1991. The question for discussion is whether
either organized garbage collection, or a districting system, would be
preferable to the open hauling system which Edina now has.
This. report reviews and defines the options in waste collection systems and
addresses the attendant policy issues.
Attachments
• September 17 Minutes
• Letters from Residents
• Hauler Response
• News Clipping - Farmington system
K
DEFINITIONS
Open Hauling: city licensed haulers can service any area of the city;
property owners contract privately with the hauler of their choice.
Districting: same as open hauling except the city requires that all solid
waste be picked up on a certain day within each designated district.
Organized Collection: the city contracts with a hauler or group of haulers
to provide service for the entire city or section /s of the city.
Organized Collection Legal Process: The Minnesota Waste Management Act
requires the following 180 -day procedure prior to implementing organized
collection. It is not required for districting.
1. Two week advance public notice, and mailed notice to all haulers
of a public hearing to consider organized collection.
2. Following the public hearing, Council may adopt a resolution of
intent to organize garbage collection.
3. A 90 -day planning period shall be spent working with the licensed
haulers of the city to develop a collection plan agreeable to the
city and the haulers.
4. :If,the city is unable to agree on a plan with the haulers within
this 90 days, it may then propose an alternate plan.
5. The second 90 -day period shall be spent in evaluating the plan (#3
or #4) according to these standards:
- achieving the stated organized collection goals of the city,
- minimizing displacement of collectors,
- ensuring participation of all interested parties in the decision
making process, and
- maximizing efficiency in solid waste collection.
EDINA GARBAGE SERVICES
Currently, there are four garbage haulers serving Edina residents: Admiral
Waste Management, Quality Waste Control, Vierkant Disposal and Woodlake
Sanitary Service (BFI). These haulers all offer volume -based garbage fees
for their customers. The increase in garbage rates in the past few years,
reflects the tip fee increase from $25 a ton to $95 a ton. Rates remained
quite stable for the past several months.
Yard waste fees varied a great deal in 1990, often tied to the level of
service. Full service customers usually paid less for yard waste pickup
than customers on a one -can or two -can garbage rate. A rate of $1 per bag
was common for low volume customers.
Major appliance disposal is now governed by state law which requires
recycling of appliances and special handling of PCB's, mercury switches and
CFCs. Garbage haulers will usually make the arrangements for a customer,
or residents can deal directly with an appliance recycler for pickup or
delivery. A charge of $20 to $25 is common for pickup service.
3
GARBAGE RATE COMPARISON - -OPEN HAULING SYSTEMS
The chart below compares the range of Edina rates and services with four
other Hennepin County cities with open hauling systems.
NUMBER OF SINGLE ONE CAN RATE TWO CAN RATE ' THREE OR NNE
CITY SYSTEM HAULERS RATE LOW -HIGH LOW -HIGH LOW -HIGH
EDINA Open 4 516.00418.25 519.00420.75 $23.75 - 525.25
BLOOMINGTON District 6 $21 514.50- 517.00 517.75419.50 521.75423.75
(one hauler)
EDEN PRAIRIE Open 3 514.00417.00 517.00419.50 $21.75 - 522.50
MINNETONKA Open 10 515.00- 518.00 518.00420.00 521.00424.00
RICHFIELD Open 5 S21 514.00417.00 517.00419.50 523.00 - 522.75
(one hauler)
The following observations can be made:
- Edina's rates are $1.25 to $2 higher per month than the other cities
listed. Since the other cities have curbside pickup, this difference
is presumed to be for garage service. Otherwise, rates are similar,
city to city.
- Distracting does not appear to affect garbage rates.
-With one exception, all haulers in these cities offer volume based s
rates.
- Volume based rates offer residents the opportunity to save money on
garbage service. For example; the difference between the lowest
one -can rate and the highest full service rate in Edina is $9.25 per
month.
GARBAGE RATE COMPARISON -- ORGANIZED HAULING SYSTEMS
30 GALLON 60 GALLON 90 GALLON YARD WASTE APPLIANCES RECYCLING
EXCELSIOR $15.16 $17.90 +$1.10 per bag Extra chg Separate contract, 51.80 /hh
HOPKINS 519.04 No extra chg Extra chg Separate contract, 52.30 /hh
(City Crew)
ROBBINSDALE $12 Recycler $14 Recy $16.50 +$1 per bag Extra chg Cost included in
$14.Non-recy S18 Non -rec 520.501 contract.
ST.LOUIS PK 516.74 Recy No extra chg No extra chg Additional 52.02 /hh /mo,
519.07 Non -Recy Same contract.
Comments on this chart:
-The rates are for curb or alley pickup.
-At all levels of service, the organized garbage.rates are somewhat
lower than open hauling rates in the cities surveyed. Many factors
such as smaller lot size and efficiency of alley pickup may account
for the lower rates. The cities which more closely resemble Edina
have open hauling systems, making comparison difficult.
4
-Yard waste pickup is included with the higher, single -rate service,
but an add -on with low- volume service. This is similar to the open
hauling rate structure.
- Garbage and recycling service can be included in the same contract,
but not all cities have chosen to do so.
- Recycling has been encouraged by lower recycling rates or low- volume
rates.
FUTURE TRENDS
The latest design is a high -tech computerized garbage truck which lifts,
records the weight, and empties a standardized garbage can automatically.
Garbage bills are then computed on the basis of weight. Farmington,
Minnesota plans to install the system this year. (See attachment)
Trash now goes in many directions: recycling systems for paper, glass,
metals, plastics, appliances,- batteries, motor oil etc. -- compost sites for
yard waste -- incineration for most garbage. This trend toward separate
handling of waste materials shows no sign of stopping.
The trend in rate structure seems to be going toward user - fees,. with
separate charges.for garbage, yard waste, recyclables, appliances etc.
POLICY CONSIDERATIONS
Why should'a city consider organized garbage collection ?. Or a districted
system? What are the policy concerns? The following factors are presented
for consideration in answering these questions.
1. Cost Savings for Residents
From the comparison charts, it appears that rates would be lower with
organized collection. The haulers disagree, stating in their responses,
that there would not be a savings for residents. (See attachments)
In organized systems, cities can set the rate structure, and thereby
promote recycling and waste reduction with volume -based fees or other
incentives.
There are, however, some unknowns. Factors such as lot size and distance
from disposal 'sites also enter into the rate setting process.
Other costs need to be considered in organized collection. City staffing
would need to be increased, perhaps by one full time equivalent position,
to deal with the additional utility billing and service problems. Also, we
should expect some delinquencies in payment of bills by residents, which
would increase costs.
2. Efficiency and Environmental Concerns
Organized collection, with one garbage truck serving a neighborhood, is the
most efficient system. It follows that there would also be a reduction in
wear on streets and in'the amount of truck exhaust.
Because of separate pickups for garbage, recycling and yard waste, Edina
neighborhoods under the present system may possibly have 10 or more trucks
providing trash collection services. With an organized system, three
trucks would get the job done in any given neighborhood.
5
3. Esthetics: Neighborhood Appearance
With districted or organized systems each neighborhood can be served on one
day with pickup of garbage, recycling and yard waste. The benefit'to the
neighborhood is a quieter, neater environment for the remainder of the
week.
4. Freedom of Choice
With an open system, residents can shop around for the hauling service that,
best suits their needs. For some, yard waste disposal is very important;
for others, a low- volume garbage rate is most important. In the past,
Edina residents expressed a strong preference to preserve their choice of
garbage haulers. In an organized collection process, residents would have
the opportunity to express their wishes on this issue at a public hearing.
5. Illegal Garbage Disposal
Edina ordinance #711 requires that garbage be collected weekly by a
licensed hauler. Contrary to this ordinance, an unknown number of
residents dispose of their garbage by other means. Some examples are:
-A resident may collect the trash of an elderly parent and dispose of
it at his /her own residence.
-Two neighbors may arrange joint garbage service, putting their
garbage in a common container and sharing the cost.
- Garbage may be taken to a dumpster at the residents' place of
business.
- Garbage may be dropped in public places, such as the Recycling
Center, Public Works Building or City Parks.
- Garbage may be allowed to accumulate on the premises.
In some cases, the rising cost of garbage collection was the motivating
factor. On the other hand, some of these practices occurred when garbage
rates were very low.
Public dumping of garbage doesn't seem to be as serious a problem for Edina
as for many other cities. Gene Bartz, Public-Works Superintendant, has not
observed any significant increase in garbage dumping in the past few
years. He feels it is a minor problem which they are able to handle.
Organized garbage collection would assure that all residents have,garbage
service. The expectation would be that practices like those listed above
would greatly diminish. One remaining question- -what happens when a bill
isn't paid? If garbage service were then discontinued, the problems would
return.
7. Response from Edina Garbage Haulers
Edina residential haulers were notified of this meeting and asked to
complete a questionnaire. Their written responses are attached to this
report.
In follow -up phone calls, the haulers all expressed their serious concern
with organized hauling systems even if they were sure to be included in the
contract. They view this. type of system as limiting their opportunities to
expand, since the pickup area and number of customers is set for the length
of the contract.
6
Likewise, a districting system is seen as interfering with their ability to
plan routes for maximum efficiency. One hauler who provides twice a week
pickup would not be able to offer this service under a districting system
unless an exception were made.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION
Many residents feel that their garbage rates are too high. They are
putting more into the recycling container, less in the garbage can, and
feel they should see.a savings on the garbage bill. This may not be a
realistic-expectation, due to the high tip fee for garbage disposal, but it
is a very understandable reaction. Perhaps new technology, such as paying
for garbage by weight, will bring more fairness into rate structures.
Each of the garbage systems has its advantages. There is not a clear -cut
easy answer. The questions comes down to: what amount of savings
justifies a changeover to a new system? $10 a year? $25 a year? or?
And, what would the public prefer?
If Council wishes to test public opinion on the issues, a public hearing
can be set as the beginning of the organized collection process. This
process can be concluded at that point if the weight of opinion so
dictates.
A districted system could be instituted with or without a public. hearing.
Council could direct staff to work with the haulers to develop such a
system for Council approval.
Lastly, if Council believes that the current system serves the residents
well, no action need be taken at this time.
i
City Council Minutes, September 17, 1990 --
REPORT PRESENTED ON SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND APARTMENT RECYCLING: COUNCIL TO
REVIEW MMTI- FAMILY RECYCLING PROGRAM IN ONE YEAR Manager Rosland recalled that
at the Council meeting of September 4, several questions were raised regarding
options for recycling and garbage collection and the costs of the various systems.
Janet Chandler, Recycling Coordinator, presented a report on basic information on
solid waste collection systems as well as staff suggestions regarding the
apartment recycling program summarized as follows.
Solid Waste Components
Solid waste now handled separately include garbage, recyclables, compostable yard
waste and hazardous waste. Garbage haulers are providing separate pickup for,the
first three listed. Collection of hazardous waste requires certain permits,
licenses and -insurance provisions and therefore these materials are picked up by
specialized haulers or may be taken to drop -off locations.
Collection Systems -
Organized Collection - City contracts with hauler or group of haulers to provide
service for whole city or sections of city.
Districting - City designates the pickup day within each district. Haulers may
have customers in any or all district but must provide_ service on designated day.
Open Hauling -- Haulers can service any area of city, property owners may choose
hauler.
City Operated - City crews perform the service using city trucks.
Service Categories by Property T}2e
Residential - Single family homes and others with individual hauling service.
Multi - family - Apartments and condominiums, centralized dumpster service.
Commercial - All non- residential, dumpster service.
Haulers classify multi - family buildings as "commercial" since these buildings have
dumpster service for'. garbage. Edina's 13 haulers are licensed to serve all
property types; however, only five provide service for residential customers.
Comparison of Collection Systems
A comparison of collection systems was given as to costs, legal requirements,
Hennepin. County policy, City ordinances, environmental considerations and public
policy concerns. It was noted that to set up Organized Collection the Minnesota
Waste Management Act requires cities to follow a set procedure beginning 180 days
before implementation. Although not legally required, it may be advisable to
follow a sj.milar procedure to set up a Districting system.
Apartment Recycling 1991
Staff has worked with the haulers, apartment owners /managers since April to set up
a recycling system per ordinances recently adopted. Haulers and managers are
moving ahead to start programs by January 1. There has been general approval on
the system, with the only concern being the issue of funding. The suggestion was
made that the City could contract for recycling service for apartments as well as
single family homes and put this in place by January, 1991. Staff would recommend
not to provide this service for .1991 but to move ahead with the program as
originally planned. Per Hennepin County policy, the $5 per unit container will be
the only funding the county will provide for apartments. If the City were to
provide this service it would have to cover the entire cost. This issue could be
addressed in the context of a study of solid waste collection options, looking to
1992 for implementation of any changes.
-over-
City Council Minutes, September' 17; 1990
Apartment Recycling Incentive Proerami
Upon Council approval, a program could be set up to provide partial funding for
apartment recycling in 1991 as follows:
When recycling programs are set up the owners or associations would
register their program with the City.
The City would verify that the program is up and running and issue a
one -time incentive payment.
Assuming an average recycling cost of $1 per unit per month, 208 funding- for 1991
would cost about $20,000. A $5 per unit payment would cost about $38,000. Funds
could be designated for this program from an anticipated surplus in the 1990
recycling budget. A surplus of approximately $50,000 is expected since Hennepin
County has agreed to fund 808 of the total $2.45 per household recycling cost for
garage service rather than 808 of the curbside cost.
Options for Council Consideration -
1) Set a public hearing date to start the process for Organized Collection.
2) Direct staff to prepare a Districting plan and determine if there are any
legal requirements that must be met.
3) Study the issues further and bring back additional information in 1991.
4), Take no action at this time.
Recycling Alteinatives for Council Consideration
1) Approve continuation of present system with a City contract for all
residential buildings of eight units or less for 1991.
2) Provide a start -up incentive for apartment /condominium recycling in buildings
of more than eight units to be funded by the anticipated $50,000 surplus in the
current recycling budget.
3) Direct staff to include multi - family buildings with more than eight units in
the City recycling contract for 1991, or study the issue further.
Staff Recommendations
1) To studv'further options for solid waste collection systems, including
apartment recycling and funding issues.
2) Proceed with apartment recycling plans as directed in ordinances for 1991.
3) Provide a start -up incentive payment for apartments and condominiums.
(Mayor Richards entered the meeting.at 8:15 p.m. during the presentation.)
The Council discussed the issue of the apartment recycling incentive program and
generally felt that some type of incentive program should be considered. However,
it was the consensus that further study and analysis should be conducted during
1991 -to better determine costs to the multi - family buildings before taking any
action.
Member Paulus made a motion that the Council review in one year the multi- family
recycling program. Motion was seconded by Member Rice.
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Richards, Smith
Motion carried.
It was' the consensus of the Council that staff should bring back early in 1991
further data on the options for solid waste collection systems. No other formal
action was taken.
rebr_iary :'_.
x-141 t.rleroyee 7a-aii
Edina. AN
C Lt'r ov..n-: LL
4801 w. 30th .1t_
£aina, nK �5 34'x:4
Dear 17-ouncil
I a?n vritina to addy-ess the problem of the -counting refuse
pzc:•!'u❑ etas-._. in £dsna va-th hopes that the suroject. wiii be
discussed at your• - leet.inq. -
Along vita nany r't.her• Edina residents, we are a two- neoole
houserola. Av nustland' = job takes him out. -of -town aimost
every week: the_refOy —e. _l:zr garbage is very minimal. usually
about. *_va filled gr•c+cery sags per week. We are on a limited
one -can service and. _irece again, last week we receives notice
of ;yet- another price increase. i he hauler cited the
increased charges due to "_rising costs in fuel, oil.
egxtzprfenol parts and postage.' This now brings our cost of
dispoEai to somewhat aver scar each filled grocery bag.
In aacition. last. Eaiv?er 1 has to sheil out another -:;25.00 to
have a gas grill hauled away.
As a DO -Year resident = ►f Edina. I wholeheartedly support the
recycling effort and par-t.ic.ipate to the fullest, including
composting grass c.lippinnE and leaves. And how about the 2
to - Dags of paper, rant. Plastic and glass that 1 recvcle
every veem which the nauxer no longer picks up`!
It seen+s to me that -- come•tning is wrong here. The trash
hauler get-= a wnoie lot more for doing a whole lot less!
What is the solution? Perhaps the City of Edina should loox
at the system used in St. Louis Park wherein one trasn hauler
services a section of the city. The fee (which includes
Pickup of appliances, mattresses, ete.) goes on the water
bill. This: is certainly more efficient than the present
method and the haulers would cut down on their "rising_ costs
in fuel. oil, etc.,'
Thank You.
Sincerely, l
Lou Gross
941 -7622
.. per S..-
- '''+ ..£,wage %.P.
October 1, 1-990
Ron Dror
6227 Westridse Blvd.
Edina, MN t-:`436
Fred Richards, Mayor
Edina City Hall
4301 W. 50th S reet
_dina, MN 55424
Dear Mr. Richards,
When my family moved to Edina three years ago, was struck
by the inefficiency or the garbage collection'system.
- having lived previously in Salt Lake City, Utah, and
Madison, Wisconsin, i was accustomed to having garbage
collected by the city or by.a company which had contracted
with the city.
I realize that the current system in Edina encourages
residents to decrease the amount of garbage they produce by
forcing them to pay for collection out of`-their own pockets
instead of through taxes. At the same time, however, the
system wastes huge amounts of energy, labor, and money. In
Salt Lake City and Madison, one garbage truck would pass by
my home each week. It would collect garbage from every
house in the area.: In Edina, on the other hand, each
household is free to contract with a different garbage
service. 'thus, many garbage trucks, one from each company,
_pass near my house every week. Although each stops at
Different homes, they all must cover the entire route.
his represents a large waste of gasoline, t -ime, and labor
to the garbage services. The cost is passed on to the
residents of Edina. If the city as a whole were to contract
with any one service, this needless waste would not occur.
The price of garbage collection would be reduced, and so
would the impact of gasoline waste on the environment.
n order to discourage garbage production by residents, the
city of Edina could collect fees in proportion to the amount
of garbage it collected. In such a system, garbage
coilection would be cneaper.and the impact on the
�rnvironment far less.
/Sincerely,
-Ron Dror
FEB 25 '91 03 :25PM
P.2 /6
WOODLAKE SANITARY SERVICE, INC.
A Subsidiary of Waste
Systems'
EDINA REFUSE HAULER QUESTIONNAIRE
If household solid waste collection were organized in Edina, do you believe
that there would be a reduction in cost of the service to the resident?
RESPONSE:
Organized collection as discussed in this region includes two different forms'
of hauling systems. One being a bid scenario, where the City sends out a bid
document and selects onli►._one hauler for their community. The second is
organized collection by consortium. This consortium includes all of the,
current haulers in the community who join together and negotiate a contract
with the City working as a single entity. The consortium then assigns routes
according to the household count each hauler held prior to the implementation
of organized collection.
On the. surface organized collection may appear in some cases to be less
expensive than the open hauling system. However, in our region there are
clear examples that organized collection is more expensive (i.e. Champlin,
etc.) . Not only is the cost at least the same if not higher,;no community
includes their administrative costs as part of the overall expense of either
system.
In comparing costs, other issues that impact price need review_ as well.
Issues such, as distance to disposal sites, service levels, and average lot
size of the community served. When all these issues are taken into
consideration organized collection is not less expensive than open
collection. However, on.the surface these issues are not easily analyzed.
If so, how much would the cost reduction be per month for a home with full
service?
RESPONSE: (NONE)
What do you believe would be the advantage of organized household refuse
collection?
RESPONSE: (NONE)
What would be the disadvantage of organized household refuse collection?
9813 Flying Cloud Drive / Eden Prairie. Minnesota 55347 1 (612) 941.5171
PAW" ,,,,wM pap* �'
FEB 25 '91 03 :26PM P.3i6
Response from Woodlake Sanitary Service, Cont'tnued
Concerns of the General Public
Organized collection takes away the consumers freedom to choose who picks up
his /her trash and at what level of service that pick up can be offered.
Edina, as an affluent suburb, has a relatively high percentage of "back door"
service. A reduction in'this rate of service will be an unpopular proposal
to many residents.
Other concerns of the general public would be the mandatory' service required
under. an organized system. The choice of those independent home owners who
choose to take their trash to the landfill /transfer station themselves is
taken away.
Since, under organized collection, each refuse company would be granted a
separate district in which only that company can provide service, what
alternative would the resident have if the refuse removal service proved
unacceptable? The refuse hauler no longer has an incentive to provide good
service to his customers, he now operates.in a closed market.
Concerns of Private Haulers
As mentioned earlier, organized collection destroys the incentive of the
private refuse hauler to provide his customers with good service. The
incentive to provide good service is competition. Organized collection is an
anti - competitive system which denies private industry any opportunity to
expand its service area or capitalize'on its ability to meet the different
needs of the public. Many residential refuse haulers rely on their "personal
touch" service to retain and expand their customer base. Organized
collection. negates any advantages a private refuse hauler might have in
offering a different type of service.
Private haulers face many service
Every refuse hauler has different
Organized collection does not take
refuse collection business:
1.) Volume
inequities under an organized system.
costs and procedures of operation.
into account some key elements of the
2.) Unequal distance to landfill /transfer station
3.) Differences in growth potential
If all the rates are the same, how does a hauler get compensated for a
greater distance to the landfill /transfer station? If one side of the city
is fully developed and the other side a new and growing development, who gets
this new expansion? These concerns are answered by private industry, not
organized collection.
Concerns -of Municipalities
The "active supervision" required by law of an organized collection system
would be a major, undertaking for the City of Edina. With the expense of
staff to administer the program, monitor service complaints, realign
boundaries, the expense of "no payments" or "late payments ", etc., the City
FEB 25 '91 03 :26PM P.4i6
Response from Woodlake Sanitary Service, Continued
will unknowingly enter the refuse collection business in a very big way.
Safety and third party liabilities are also a concern to municipalities.
Since the City would- be under contract to the Organized 'Collection
Corporation, the City would have the ultimate responsibility for the trash
under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (Superfund). The City must
also be concerned with the insurance coverage levels of all of the refuse
haulers. By contracting with the Organized Collection Corporation, the City
can now be named as a third party in any resulting lawsuit. This third party
liability would also include any Workers' Compensation action.
Organized collection exposes the City of Edina to area of liability and
expense that are now handled and absorbed by private industry. The actions
necessary for installing an organized system, districting (lack of choice),
mandatory service, limited service and potential bad service open City
Officials to large areas of potential public outcry.
Recycling, which is the- main goal of Edina, is not dependent on organized
collection. A private industry effort, like the one currently in place, can
and will solve the needs of Edina as mandated by the Metropolitan Council.
Other Comments:
RESPONSE: See attached materials.
Illegal dumping is often an issue discussed in conjunction with organized
collection. Communities believe that organized collection eliminates illegal
dumping and "garbage houses" because garbage is collected at every household.
This appears to be logic however, all communities report increases with
illegal dumping whether in the open system or the organized collection
system. The so called garbage houses are a matter 'of mental health and not a
collection process. Illegal dumping is still taking place (i.e. Minneapolis)
to help a household decrease their volume rate. Further, illegal dumping
takes place because of irresponsible, anti - social behavior and illegal
dumping is not a sole problem of the open hauling system.
Return to: David A. Velde Company Name: Woodlake Sanitary Service, Inc.
City of Edina
4801 West 50th St. Telephone #: (612) -941 -5174
Edina, MN 55424 �+
Your Name: /
Kevin Tritz
1'.11w FEB 25 '91 03:27PM
H I'LL NG- ,J1`4 -4e,4
P.5 /6
I'e�.11.yl 11�1J !'.t15
Response from Woodlake Sanitary, Continued
Ndft
M%mv
ro/s -C
tite I lews
.. .
i.
Sthr Tribune
Tuesday
October 23 /1990
Read then recycle 1 B w.
+ f i
... M%W
•lit
"$y Sicre Brandt
-S(all'Writer
When Independence Mayor Marvin
= Johnsu,I isn't fighting a proposal to
:put a landfill in his westem Hennc-
Tin .County community, he farms.
plc's righting garbage along his fens
'lines as well. Sometimes it's tires.
-Other times it's brush.
"Last year we had practically a whole
living room set sitting in a turner of
our cornrtcid," Johnson said.
.`Across the Twin Cities metiopoliun
at•ea, mono people like Johnson arc
being victimized • by illegal trash
dumping. Rising disposal fees are
protnptinq more people to try to
.make their garbage someone else's
tProblerti. They risk fines of up to
750 • by stashing trash in ditches,
• ysiness trash bins or even ,other
L-0 -mle's cans.
,..
Zhe victims are righting back. Some
.businesses are padlocking their bins
and others search -bags of unwanted
trash for envelopes or other evidence
Of where the refuse originated.
egal.dumping on rise
.s, hauling fees increase
Minneapolis .ofttclals began offering
$50 rewards last year to citizens
whose rcVoris at illegal dumping ft.
Suit In successful prosecutions.
The rise in illegal trash dumping has
resulted in a staff proposal to the
Metropolitan Council that all house-
holds. business or institutions that
Produce trash be required to main-
tain a contract with a hauler.
There always has been some illegal
dumping along railroads, in vacant
lots and in ditches. But rising costs
mean a marked increase in the prob•
lem, in Carver County, according to
Mike Lien. the county's envirunmcn-
tal manager: `
Ditches in less populous areas on the
fringe of the region regularly are lit-
tered .with items that are banned.
front trash cans or are hauled away
tor''an extra charge. These include
tires, appliances, furniture, yard
waste and even demolition waste.
Waste specialists describe two types
of culprits. One is a homeowner who '
is simply too cheap to pay ristho i
hauler charges. The other is an unli.
tensed hauler. According to Metro-
politan Council estimates, the cost of
residential garbage service has risen `•
between. 40 and 100 percent in urban
areas iri the past two years, prompt-
ing some Customers to cancel trash
pickup. The increase was estimated
at 25 percent for rural residents of
the region.
When haulers or businesses do find
Trash continued on page 713
FEB 25 '91 03 :27PM P.6i6
1:.11`1 t_FlkL�UH ILL NU.JrCJ -4itr4 I•t:U.419`11 ll -.44 1-.UU
Response from Woodlake Sanitary, Continued
Glenn Kiecker, who supervises pollution control for Minneapolis, Investigated an Illegal dump site In the city
Monday. He found papers with addresses at the site that may assist in tracking down the sources of the trash.
Trash Continued from page 1D .
people not clever cnoufh to remove
identification from their trash, they
IIcanepin County charges haulers
sgs a ton to dispose of trash, a fce
in taarvice County.
i
submit a bill and threaten to turn the
"It
that finances multiple waste disposal
Glcan Kieeker, who supervises pollu-
"latter over to police. works 100
perecut of the tune," said Sandy
programs. In Ramsey County, where
tltc fee increased recently from about
tion control for Minneapolis, said
unlicensed Itnulers cruise alleys to
Roskowiak, one of the owners of
Randy's Sanitation.
S50 to almost $67 per ton, Herinann
finds less illegal dumping.
solicit garbage from people who have
just cleaned their garages or, base -
One commercial hauler says
y prob-
Aennepitt's trash fees have spillover
merits. They charge a -high ice and
dump the trash without paying for i
Icros with illcgal dumping are the•
effects on some neighboring counties,
disposal.
worst in the western metropolitan
"That's going to be the headache of
area. "Certainly Hennepin County by
far has the worst problem,,' said Tint
the next few years. ICs pretty easy to
drive down the road and damp a
"They ran make an awful lot of "ton- i
cy on this," Kiecker said.
Hermann, a vice president of Angard
refrigerator ofl'the back of a truck or
I:nvironmcntat Services.
.
a couple bags of garbage," said Lien
I
I.
A
Response from Vierkant Disposal
EDINA REFUSE HAULER QUESTIONNARIE
If household solid waste collection were organized in Edina, do you
believe that there would be a reduction in cost of the service to
the resident? �JJ�
A(/P/
If so, how much would the cost reduction'be per month for a home
with full service?
What do you believe would be the advantage of organized household
refuse collection?
What would be the disadvantage of organized household refuse
collection?
Other Comments: /
Return to: David A. Velde Company Name:
City of Edina
4801 West 50th St. Telephone #: ' as - A S-0
Edina, MN 55424
Your Name:
MAM MORSOFSMAFF PHOTOGRAPHER
A high -tech garbage truck, using Its robot -like mechanical arm, weighs a can of garbage before empty -
Ing It to haul the trash away-
FARIIIIIIIOTOM
High -tech garbage hauling
device figures. what you owe
RICHARD CNN sTAFF wwrErt
Garbage hauling is going high -tech in Farmington.
The city is planning an innovative program to use
automated and computerized garbage trucks that can
measure and record the weight of every garbage can.
That way, Farmington residents will be charged ac-
cording to the weight of what they throw away.
City officials hope it will be a more precise and fair
way of billing. High rollers who throw out more trash
and take up more space in garbage trucks and land-
fills will have to pay more. Frugal folks who aren't so
wasteful will pay less.
The new equipment also means haulers will no long-
er need to wrestle garbage cans around, instead
they'll have to punch a keyboard and use a bar code
scanner.
The city plans to install and test the equipment this
year and start weight -based billing in 1992. Garbage
officials believe it may be the first weight -based city-
wide system in the nation.
The total cost to implement the project will be
$154,166, but the city is applying for a $68,163 grant
from the Metropolitan Council to .help pay for the
equipment.
The program is expected to encourage residents to
trim the weight of their trash cans through increased
recycling. The city hopes for a 5 percent to 10 percent
reduction in garbage collections. If that happens, not
only will recycling residents see a decrease in their
bills, but the cost for the entire city garbage system
also should drop because the city will have to pay less
for disposal at a landfill or garbage processing center.
Robert Williamson, Farmington solid waste coordi-
nator, said the proposal has attracted interest from
public officials from around the country.
other haulers have offered volume -based billing,
but the difference is that those systems mean keeping
track of different -sized garbage cans, he said.
The city of nearly 6,000 people is used to being on
the cutting edge of garbage management, ply be-
cause it has more control of how it deals with its
waste than most other cities in the metro area.
It is the only Dakota County city that owns and op-
erates its own garbage hauling program to pick up
waste for all residents and businesses. Most other cit-
ies have left garbage hauling to the private sector. In
those towns. residents and companies hire whatever
private hauler they choose.
With control over its own garbage program, Farm-
ington offers its residents an opportunity to recycle
more different kinds of materials than any other city
in the county. Residents have curbside pickup of office
paper, corrugated cardboard, batteries and plastics, in
addition to the traditional recyclables: newspapers,
cans and glass.
Williamson said the city recycles about 29 percent
to 30 percent of its residential and commercial gar -
bage, including yard waste.
Farmington also is proposing to build a garbage
compost and recycling project, which would make it
the only city in Dakota County that would not have to
send waste to the county's proposed garbage mmnera-
tor project.
County recycling specialist Mike Trdan said Farm -
ington's recycling rate is one of the best in the county
and the best documented.
"They know what they're doing right to the pound,"
he said. "I think for a small town, they have accom-
plished an awful lot."
To set up the weight -based garbage collection sys-
tem, the city plans to operate two special garbage
trucks with hydraulic arms that hoist garbage cans
over the side of the truck instead of the back end.
Traditional back - loading trucks require at least two
workers to operate, but the side - loading tracks only
need one worker.
In the new trucks, the operator drives up to a can at
the curb and stays in the cab while he controls the
hydraulic arm that reaches out from the side of the
truck and snatches up the can with what looks like a
mighty mechanical lobster claw.
Before the garbage is dumped in the truck, a sensor
in the hydraulic arm measures how much the can
weighs, and that information is entered into a portable
computer in the cab. The operator also uses a bar code
sensor to record the address of the customer. Other
information also can be coded into the computer, such
as the license plate number of a vehicle blocking ac-
cess to the garbage can.
Back at city offices, the computer will add up the
weight of each customer's garbage and calculate the
bill every quarter.
Williamson said residents will be charged a flat
service fee, plus a fee for every 10 pounds of garbage
thrown away.
Currently, the city charges each resident $42.50 per
quarter for picking up a 90 -gallon container of gar-
bage per week, whether the can is half -full or over -
flowing.
To get the stew system rolling, Farmington needs to
buy another garbage truck, computer equipment and
software, weight sensors, garbage cans and address
decals for the cans.
S1 l&I..I P,oxear
�1a �aol�f, .t , l 44 l
Fra4;
} PA
of
lees
To: Ken Rosl and
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
From: Janet Chandler
Date: March 4, 1991
Subject: Yard Waste Rebate
Application
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
v 1.
D.
Consent
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
7
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
0
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Resolution to authorize submittal of 1991 Hennepin County Yard Waste Rebate
application.
Info/Background-
The Hennepin County Board has authorized extension of the Yard Waste Rebate
to Cities through 1991. The amount of the rebate will be approximately the
same as that received in 1990, which, for Edina was $71,163. Application
must be made now in order to qualify for funding.
The staff proposal is to distribute the rebate in the same manner as last
year (shown below). Property owners would each receive a credit of
approximately $5 on the utility bill during the September- October - November
billing cycle. The actual amount might be slightly higher because
administrative costs are expected to be lower.
13,987 accounts @ $5 $69,935
Administrative costs 1,228
Total fund $71,163
Residents would be informed through a message printed on the bill and an
article in the "About Town" newsletter.
-over-
YARD WASTE REBATE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the 1991 Hennepin County yard waste program consists of providing
rebates to municipalities for the local management of yard waste; and
WHEREAS, Edina has established a method of requiring private haulers to
take yard waste to County approved compost sites; and
WHEREAS, Edina has also established a method of passing on a rebate to the
residents of the City through a credit on the utility bill; and
WHEREAS, this program meets the requirements of Hennepin County Resolutions
#90- 5 -373R2 and #90 -9 -819;
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council authorizes submittal
of the Hennepin County Yard Waste Rebate Application to continue this
program through 1991.
YARD WASTE REBATE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the 1991 Hennepin County yard waste program consists of providing rebates
to municipalities for the local management of yard waste; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edina has established a method of requiring private haulers
to take yard waste to County approved compost sites; and
WHEREAS, Edina has also established a method of passing on a rebate to the
residents of the City through a credit on�the utility bill; and
WHEREAS, this program meets the requirements of Hennepin County Resolutions
#90- 5 -373R2 and #90 -9 -819;
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council authorizes submittal of the
Hennepin County Yard Waste Rebate Application to continue this program through
1991.
ADOPTED this 4th day of March, 1991.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do
hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct
copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular
Meeting of March 4, 1991, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 5th day of March, 19911.
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
Agenda Item VI.E
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Fred Richards
FROM: Susan Wohlrabe
SUBJECT: HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION MATTERS
DATE: February 22, 1991
I have just received the attached confirmation from the School District
regarding the reappointment of Noah Hurley and Betsy Flaten to the Human
Relations Commission for another three -year term. I believe this should be on
the March 4th Council agenda.
The other attachment has been reviewed by Noah Hurley and referred to me for
your information. Apparently, David Hallett has experienced unavoidable
excuses for three consecutive absences at the Commission meetings. He has a
genuine interest in serving on the Human Relations Commission, and his fellow
Commissioners think highly of him as he was just elected Vice Chair. It is
David's hope, as well as Noah's, that he can continue serving on the
Commission.
For your information, his last absence was due to my changing the Commission
meeting from its regular Tuesday night to Thursday due to the Council Meeting
on February 19th.
sw
Attachment
LAURESS V.ACKMAN
GERALD E.MAGNUSON
EDWARD M.GLENNON
MELVIN I.ORENSTEIN
ROBERT J. SHERAN
ISRAEL E. KRAWETZ
EUGENE KEATING
JAMES P. MARTINEAU
RICHARD J. FITZGERALD
JOHN A. FORREST
WILLIAM E. FOX
JOHN J. CONNELLY
JERROLD F. BERGFALK
DAVID M. LEBEDOFF
JOHN H.STROTHMAN
DAVID G. NEWHALL
KURTIS A. GREENLEY
ROBERT V. ATMORE
PATRICK DELANEY
RONALD G.VANTINE
JOHN B. WINSTON
LAURANCE R. WALDOCH
THOMAS H. GARRETT III
DARYLE L. UPHOFF
DAVI D J.D AVENPO RT
MARK R. JOHNSON
R! WALTER BACH .IAN
L 1 N D Q U i S T& VENN U M
DAVID AJALLGEYER
THOMAS L. FASEL
TERRENCE J. FLEMING
JEFFREY R. SCHMIDT
4200 IDS CENTER
ROLF ENGH
-1MOTMY M. BUTLER
MINNEAPOLIS MINNESOTA 55402 -2205
RICHARD T. OSTLUNO
ROBERT G. MIT CMELL.JR.
J. MICHAEL DADY
.
TELEPHONE 16121 371 -3211
DEBORAH M. REGAN
MARTIN R. ROSENBAUM
J. KEVIN COSTLEY
ELINOR C. ROSENSTEIN
ROBERT J. HARTMAN
ROSAN14E H. WIRTH
JOSEPH G. KOHLER
FAX: 16121 371 -3207
DEBRA K. PAGE
RICHARD D. MCNEIL
CABLE: LINLAW MINNEAPOLIS
MICHAEL D. 0LAFSON
DONALD C. SWENSON
JOEL H. GREEN
BRUCE A. BONJOUR
WAYZATA OFFICE
DAVID L. HALLETT
JAMES P. MCCARTHY
740 EAST LAKE STREET
CHARLES R.WEAVER. JR.
STEVEN J. JOHNSON
_
55391
DAVID L. SASSEVILLE
RICHARD IHRIG
WAYZATA. MINNESOTA
DAVID A. DONNA
CAROL T. RIEGER
JONATHAN M.BYE
RODERICK 1. MACKENZIE
MARY P. MCCONNELL
WILLIAM E. FLYNN
SALLY S. GROSSMAN
JAMES W. REUTER
WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER
TIMOTHY R. BA ER
MICHAEL S. MARGULIES
TIMOTHY S. MCINTEE
THOMAS G. LOVETT IV
JOSEPH A. THOMSON
THOMAS E.GLENNON
ANN L. IIJIMA
JOHN R. HOUSTON
ELIZABETH G. ABY
DEN NJ M. O'M ALLEY
SALLY J. WHITESIDE
EDWARD J. WEGESON
KATHARINE N. HELMS
371 -3210
February 19, 1991
Noah Hurley, Chair
Edina Human Relations Commission
C/o Susan Wohlrabe
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
RE: Anticipated Absence from February 21, 1991
Meeting of the Human Relations commission
Dear Noah:
a -
WALLACE G. HILKE
CHARLES P. MOORSE
PAT JO POFAHL
LUKE H. TER MAAR
KAREN L. SCHREIBER
CHARLES J. LLOYD
JAMES A. LODOEN
SUSAN R. MONKMEYER
JON G. TRANGSRUD
TIMOTHY Y. WONG
RANDY G. GULLICKSON
SARAH DUFF HALVORSON
SANDRA KIM
WILLIAM R. MIKOS
ROBERT E.TUNHEIM
ANSIS V. VIKSNINS
LAURA L. DALY
OF COUNSEL
LEONARD E. LINDOUIST
NORMAN L. NEWHALL
RETIRED
THOMAS VENNUM
As we discussed during our,telephone conversation on
February 18, 1991, due to a scheduling conflict created by my
obligation to attend the Annual Meeting of one•of our clients, I
will be unable to attend this week's meeting of the Edina Human
Relations Commission. I agreed to be present at the Annual
Meeting prior to receiving notice of the rescheduling of this
week's Commission meeting. Unfortunately, by the time I received
notice of the Commission meeting, it was impossible for me to
make other arrangements with our client.
As I have told you in the past, I fully support the work of
the Commission and continue to be committed to active membership
on the Commission and attendance at its meetings. If.yeu need
further information, please let me know. Thanks, Noah.
Very truly yours,
David L. Hallett
DLH:jah
ACTION
408
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 273
Regular Meeting, February 11, 1991
Volume 62, Report 265
SUBJECT: REAPPOINTMENT TO EDINA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION
Be it Resolved, That
The Board of Education
Reappoint Betsy Flaten to the Edina Human
Relations Commission effective February 1, 1991,
for a three -year term to expire January 31, 1994.
BACKGROUND
Betsy Flaten is one of six appointees made to the Human
Relations Commission by the School Board and has indicated a
willingness to serve another term. Mrs. Flaten was
originally appointed to complete the unexpired term of Nancy
Maley from 12/21/87 to 1/31/88, with a subsequent
reappointment 2/1/88. This would now be the second three -
year term for Mrs..Flaten.
Current Commissioners Term expires
Betsy Flaten
1/31/91
Noah Hurley
1/31/91
Phyllis Kohler
1/31/92
Nancy Atchison
1/31/92
David Hallett.
1/31/93
Sharon Ming
1/31/93
Edina School District Policy 18140
r
409
ACTION
SUBJECT:
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 273
Regular Meeting, February 11, 1991
. Volume 62, Report 266
REAPPOINTMENT TO EDINA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION
Be it Resolved, That
The Board of Education
Reappoint Noah Hurley to the Edina Human Relations
Commission effective February 1, 1991, for a
three -year term to'expire January 31, 1994.
BACKGROUND
Noah'Hurley is one of six appointees,made to the Human
Relations Commission by the School Board_ and has indicated a
willingness to serve another term. Mr. Hurley was
originally appointed to complete the unexpired term of Lynn
Westphal from 7/11/88 to 1/31/91. This would now be the
second three -year term for Mr. Hurley.
Current Commissioners Term expires
Noah Hurley
1/31/91
Betsy Flaten
1/31/91
Phyllis Kohler
1/31/92
Nancy Atchison
1/31/92
David Hallett
1/31/93
Sharon Ming
1/31/93
O
Edina School-District Policy #8140
1991 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
03 -04 -91 PAGE 1
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV..# P.O: # MESSAGE-
063700
02/22/91
77.50
MN AUTO DAMAGE
DAMAGE APPRAISAL
10- 4504 - 560 -56
50464
3150
77.50
063701
02/22/91
40.94-
IND FLOOR MAINT
BROOMS
10- 4534 - 310 -30
6073
3050
063701
02/22/91
409.40
IND FLOOR MAINT
BROOMS
10- 4534 - 310 -30
6073
3050
063701
02/22/91
40.94
IND FLOOR MAINT
BROOMS
10- 4534- 310 -30
6073
3050
409.40
063702
02/22/91
10.00
MOTOR SERVICE
SHIPPING CHARGES
10- 4204 - 280 -28
3283
10.00
B6
063703
M - W46S UND
06iiBO
9899
02/22/91
210.00
210.00*
TOM WASSMUND
UNEF6RM6
SNOW PLOWING
98 42.62
50- 4248 - 841 -84
1002
063704
02/22/91
99.95
WIDE WORLD OF GOLF
GOLF VIDEOS
27- 2237 - 000 -00
99.95
063705
02/22/91
22.00
US WEST CELLULAR
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 781 -78
960311
22.00
Q6,IX
02/22/91
75.50
Todd Uniform Inc
Uniforms
30- 4262- 782 -78
75.50*
* *it-CKS
063707
02/22/91
599.00
GRINNELL CORP
GATEVALVE
40- 4540 - 805 -80
F13168
2976
599.00
063708
02/22/91
60.00
METRO CHIEF FIRE
DUES
10- 4204- 440 -44
is
60.00 *
063709
02/22/91
105.00
FMAM
DUES
10- 4204 - 440 -44
105.00 *
063710
02/22/91
56.76
VALLEY VIEW ASSO
REPAIR PARTS
30- 4540 - 782 -78
6799
3280
56.76
063711
02/22/91
265.00
HAGEN COMPANIES
GEN SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
13464
3281
265.00 *
063712
02/22/91
35.00
METRO LEGAL SERVICES
TITLE SEARCH
11- 4201 - 127 -12
35.00 *
063713
02/22/91
129.00
ABM EQUIP /SUPPLY
OUTSIDE REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
9944
3102
129.00
063714
02/22/91
205.76
HANCE COMPANIES
BATTERY
10 -4540- 560 -56
6892
2591
063714
02/22/91
55.70
HANCE COMPANIES
BATTERY
10- 4540 - 560 -56
6261
2419
261.46
063715
02/22/91
159.00
MARCH DIST INC
REPAIR MANUAL
10- 4504 - 560 -56
2962
159.00
063716
02/22/91
236.50
WHEELERS HARDWARE
DOOR
10- 4540 - 390 -30
7415
2782
236.50
063717
02/22/91
351.04
JAMES ROBINSON
LODGING /MEALS
10- 4206 - 440 -44
1991 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
03 -04 -91 PAGE 2
CHECK NO.
DATE.
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. #.MESSAGE <
063717
02/22/91
110.00
JAMES ROBINSON
MILEAGE
10- 4208 - 440 -44
461.04
063718
02/22/91
28.79
APPLIANCE PARTS INC
HUMIDISTAT
10- 4540 - 560 -56
31250 3157
28.79 *
063719
02/22/91
45.00
WINE SPECTATOR
MAGAZINES
50- 4632 - 862 -86
266029
45.00 *
063720
02/22/91
382.00
MEL SATTER
MISC PARTS
10- 4504 - 560 -56
382.00
063721
02/22/91
60.66
APA
BOOKS
10- 4502 - 120 -12
310987
60.66 *
063722
02/22/91
5.00
CITY /W ST PAUL
DUES
10- 4204 - 500 -50
5.00 *
063723
02/22/91
888.65
DIESEL INJECTN SPEC
INJECTORS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
9650 1402
888.65
063725
02/22/91
327.70
DAYTON STENCIL WORKS
SIGNS
27- 4504- 664 -66
191169 3032
327.70
063726
02/22/91
7.35
SUB TAXI CORP
TAXI REFUND
10- 3074- 000 -00
063726
02/22/91
735.00
SUB TAXI CORP
TAXI REFUND
10- 3074 - 000 -00
063726
02/22/91
7.35-
SUB TAXI CORP
TAXI REFUND
10- 3074 - 000 -00
735.00
063727
02/22/91
115.20
BENJAMINS REST /BAKE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
28- 4624 - 703 -70
115.20
063728
02/22/91
12.14
DORIE BARMAN
CULTURAL EXPO
10- 4280 - 504 -50
12.14
063729
02/22/91
1,292.29
SOFTWARE MKG INTERNL
SCAN MINUTES
10- 4201 - 140 -14
91057 3197
1,292.29
063730
02/22/91
615.00
LINDA KOZAK
SERV 2/27 -3/12
30- 4201 - 781 -78
615.00
063731
02/22/91
333.50
HARRIS MECH CONTRACT
REIMBURSEMENT
10- 3110 - 000 -00
333.50
063732
02/22/91
37.50
BARRETT INC
SCREEN PRINTING
10- 4201 - 621 -62
3535
37.50
063733
02/25/91
80.00
WARNING LITES OF MN
SCHOOL
10- 4202 - 281 -28
80.00 *
063734
02/25/91
117.00
THE WINDOW
AC ADVERTISING
23- 4516 - 611 -61
117.00 *
063735
02/25/91
72.00
PATTI JEUB
AC INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201 - 611 -61
1991 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
063736
063737
063738
063739
063740
063741
063742
063743
063744
063745
063746
063747
063748
063749
063750
063751
063752
063753
063753
02/25/91
02/25/91
02/25/91
02/25/91
02/25/91
02/25/91
02/25/91
02/25/91
02/25/91
02/25/91
02/25/91
02/25/91
02/25/91
02/25/91
02/25/91
02/25/91
02/25/91
02/25/91
02/25/91
AMOUNT
72.00
312.00
312.00 *
220' ' 00
220.00 *
156.00
156.00 *
103.00
103.00 *
56.00
56.00 *
17.00
17.00 *
57.00
57.00 *
19.00
19.00 *
17.10
17.10 *
30.00
30.00 *
11.00
11.00 *
30.00 .
30.00 *
85.60
85.60 *
50.00
50.00 *
75.00
75.00 *'
70.00
70.00
10.00
10.00
24.90
472.00
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
DANNY MACKERMAN
KAREN KNUTSON
LOUSIE GILLIS
DONNA FAUS
COURTNEY COMB
EVELYN HUNDT
MARILEE WUOLLET
LOWELL HUNDT
LYDIA PERTINEN
WILLIAM CACINETS
LEROY LISK
COLLEGE OF
STATE OF MN
MPLS COMMODORES
JACKI BETSWORTH
DIANE ARENSON
DEPT OF LABOR
COMM FURNITURE
COMM FURNITURE
AC INSTRUCTOR
AC INSTRUCTOR
AC INSTRUCTOR
CLASS CANCEL
CLASS CANCEL
CLASS CANCEL
CLASS CANCEL
CLASS CANCEL
CLASS CANCEL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DR LICENSE
CONT ED
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SERV 4/11/91
SERV 4/18/91
REFUND
RENEWAL
REMODELING
REMODELING
03 -04 -91 PAGE 3
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 3500 - 000 -00
23- 3500 - 000 -00
23- 3500 - 000 -00
23- 3500 - 000 -00
23- 3500 - 000 -00
23- 3500 - 000 -00
10- 4504 - 646 -64
10- 4310 - 440 -44
50- 4206 - 860 -86
10- 4504 - 560 -56
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 4224 - 781 -78
30- 3505- 000 -00
30- 4202 - 781 -78
25- 4924- 520 -52 3047
25- 4924 - 520 -52 4391
3404
1991 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
03 -04 -91 PAGE 4
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. #:MESSAGE
063753
02/26/91
1,000.80
COMM FURNITURE
REMODELING
25- 4924 - 520 -52
4392
3424
1,497.70
063754
02/25/91
162.00
LITTLE BLIND SPOT
BLINDS
10- 4504 - 520 -52
1407
3403
162.00
*
063755
02/25/91
305.30
STREFF INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 100 -10
1296
3402
305.30
*
063756
02/25/91
72.95
ADDON INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 667 -66
30920
3198
72.95
063757
02/25/91
54.00
SANCO INC
CLEANING SUPPLIES
27- 4512 - 667 -66
22780
3259
54.00
*
063758
02/25/91
88.51
FOX VALLEY SYSTEM
GENERAL SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 667 -66
3417
88.51
*
063759
02/25/91
613.00
VALLEY VIEW ASSO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 783 -78
6771
2848
613.00
063760
02/26/91
18.00
TIM ZIMMERMAN
REIMBURSEMENT
10- 4202 - 600 -60
18.00
*
063761
02/26/91
176.90
CUSTOM RUBBER STAMP
OFFICE SUPPLIES
23- 4516- 611 -61
6745
2726
176.90
*
063762
02/26/91
19.30
ACTION MESSENGER
SERVICE CONTRACTS
30- 4288 - 781 -78
051873
19.30
063763
02/26/91
140.00
VIKING UPDATE
ADVERTISING
27 -4214- 667 -66
2247
140.00
*
063764
02/26/91
60.00
MN URBAN TRAFFIC
REGISTRATION
10- 4202 - 281 -28
60.00
063765
02/26/91
40.00
MN CHAPTER IACCI
MEMBERSHIP
10- 4204 - 420 -42
40.00
*
063766
02/26/91
42.17
ROGER OLWIN
MEETING EXP
10- 4206 - 420 -42
42.17
*
063767
02/26/91
34.95
BOTTOM LINE PERSONAL
RENEWAL
10- 4204 - 420 -42
34.95
*
063768
02/26/91
45.40
CRAIG SWANSON
MEETING EXP
10- 4206 - 420 -42
45.40
063769
02/26/91
400.00
SCOTT BECHTOLD
CONT ED
10- 4202 - 420 -42
400.00
063770
02/26/91
47.77
PRENTICE HALL
SUBSCRIPTION
10- 4204 - 420 -42
47.77
063771
02/26/91
56.15
PRECISION GUN SPEC
AMMUNITION
10- 4572 - 420 -42
2016
3169
1991 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
063772
063773
063774
063775
063775
063776
063776
063777
063778
063779
063780
063781
063782
063783
063784
063785
063786
063787
063788
063788
02/26/91
02/26/91
02/26/91
02/26/91
02/26/91
02/26/91
02/26/91
02/26/91
02/26/91
02/26/91
02/26/91
02/26/91
02/26/91
02/26%91
02/26/91
02/26/91
02/26/91
02/26/91
02/26/91
02/26/91
AMOUNT
56.15 *
195.00
195.00 *
66.22
66.22 *
387.73
387.73 *
260.00
270.00
530.00 *
226.87
44.88
271.75 *
454.24
454.24 *
60.00
60.00 *
3,114.84
3,114.84 *
4,896.00
4,896.00 *
939.74
939.74 *
218.00
218.00 *
46.90
46.90 *
25.00
25.00 *
133.00
133.00 *
11.00
11.00 *
64.22
64.22 *
176.00
371.50
547.50 *
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
DEPT OF FINANCE
A I HALPER BOX CO
ACCUFORM GOLF LTD
JILL CAMERON
JILL CAMERON
CRAIG WERNESS
CRAIG WERNESS
STANDARD FUSEE CORP
MACQUEEN EQUIP
HENN CTY TREASURER
KRUASE ANDERSON CON
TCS ENTERPRISE
QUANTUM CLEAN SERV
WORLD DIST
CITY ENGINEERS
LINDA DALEN
STEPHEN LANDRY
ISADORE B LONDON
PINK COMPANIES
PINK COMPANIES
CONT ED
AMMUNITION
GENERAL SUPPLIES
WP 51 CLASS II
WP5 1 CLASS I
MILEAGE
MILEAGE
SAFETY EQUIP
RESERVATIONS
WORKHOUSE /JAIL
CONSTRUCTION
AMMUNITION
CARPET CLEANING
TOOLS
DUES
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
AMBULANCE REFUND
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
03 -04 -91 PAGE 5
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4202 - 420 -42 020808
10- 4572 - 420 -42 17554
27- 4504- 664 -66 5919 3253
10- 4201 - 600 -60 14043
10- 4201 - 600 -60 1042
10- 4208 - 600 -60
10- 4208 - 600 -60
10- 4642 - 420 -42 2940
10- 4202 - 281 -28
10- 4286- 220 -22 000050
60- 1300 - 290 -04
10- 4572- 420 -42 2513 2941
28- 4248 - 702 -70 3565 2714
10- 4580 - 642 -64 3373
10- 4204 - 240 -24
10- 4202 - 160 -16
10- 4310 - 440 -44
10- 3180 - 000 -00
27- 4504- 662 -66 531013 3188
27- 4504 - 662 -66 531014 2831
1991 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
063789
02/26/91
063790
02/26/91
063791
02/26/91
063792
02/26/91
063793
02/26/91
kkkk *k
063A01
02/22/91
kkkkkk
* ** -CKS
063A08
02/25/91
k k k k k k
063A19
02/25/91
k k k k k k
063A21
02/22/91
kkkkkk
7130
063A29
02/25/91
k k k k k k
063A34
02/22/91
k k k k k k
063A39
02/22/91
063A39
02/25/91
063A39
02/25/91
063A39
02/22/91
063A39
02/22/91
* *kkk k
AMOUNT
7,600.00
7,600.00 *
615.00
615.00 *
117.28
117.28 *
30.00
30.00 *
95.40
95.40 *
169.34
169.34
61.76
61.76
46.07
46.07
195.71
195.71
11.13
11.13
48.50
48.50
204.32
28.90
16.70
64.60
55.00
369.52
I
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
NATL CAR RENTAL CAR
HOPKINS FIRE DEPT HAZMAT RESPONSE
TEAM MARKETING CO GENERAL SUPPLIES
TRI STATE VIDEO SERV REPAIRS
BAILEY POTTERY EQ GENERAL SUPPLIES
3M CO LETTERS
ABP MIDWEST INC CULTURAL EXPO
ADVON UNIFORMS
'ADT SECURITY SYS.
ALBINSON
ALLIED PLASTICS
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
ALARM SERVICE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
REPAIR PARTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES -
REPAIR PARTS
STARTER
REBUILT
REPAIR PARTS
kk *-
CKS°
10- 4280 - 504 -50 533076 3331
k k k-CKS "�
30- 4262 - 782 -78 899061 3350
* ** -CKS
30- 4304 - 782 -78
992394
3336
* ** -CKS
30- 4504 - 782 -78
717822
2457
* ** -CKS
27- 4540 - 666 -66
6561
3248
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 325 -30
7130
3048
10- 4540- 560 -56
13849
3068
10- 4540 - 560 -56
13263
2980
10- 4540 - 560 -56
15276
3217
10- 4540 - 560 -56
13863
3153
* ** -CKS
1991 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
03 -04 -91
PAGE 7
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. #
MESSAGE
063A41
02/26/91
93.60
AMBASSADOR FOODS
MEAT
27- 4624 - 662 -66
2688
93.60
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
063A45
02/26/91
40.26
AMER. PHOTO COPY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42
F36841
40.26
* * * * **
* *. -CKS
063A48
02/25/91
262.72
ALPHA VIDEO /AUDIO
CAMERA REPAIR
10- 4248 - 520 -52
90318
3148
262.72
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
063A53
02/25/91
106.67
AMERICAN SHARECOM
TELEPHONE
10- 4256 - 510 -51
106.67
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
063A64
02/25/91
576.00
MARIAN ALSTAD
AC INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201- 611 -61
576.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
063A76
02/22/91
259.40
ASPLUND COFFEE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
28- 4248 - 703 -70
15828
3252
259.40
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
063A82
02/26/91
4.06
AT & T
TELEPHONE
10- 4256 - 510 -51
063A82
02/26/91
38.26
AT & T
TELEPHONE
27- 4256 - 662 -66
063A82
02/26/91
2.96
AT & T
TELEPHONE
27- 4256 - 664 -66
063A82
02/26/91
93
AT & T
TELEPHONE
40- 4256 - 803 -80
46.21
*
063A83
02/26/91
140.00
AT & T INFO SYSTEM
TELEPHONE
10- 4256 - 628 -62
140.00
*
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
063A96
02/22/91
33.50
AUTOMOBILE SERV CTR
ALIGNMENT
10- 4248 - 560 -56
5588
3226
33.50
* * * * **
*.* -CKS
063B01
02/25/91
92.50
B & B SEAT COVERS
REPLACEMENT PARTS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
11623
2953
92.50
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
063603
02/22/91
75.00
BENSON OPTICAL
SAFETY GLASSES
10- 4642 - 301 -30
456790
063603
02/25/91
20.35
BENSON OPTICAL
SAFETY GLASSES
10- 4642 - 646 -64
81663
3132
95.35
*
1991 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -04 -91 PAGE 8
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* k k k * k
063B13
02/25/91
819.16
BARR
ENGINEERING
063613
02/25/91
601.14
BARR
ENGINEERING
34,191.85
PARTS
1,420.30
063B18
02/22/91
377.76
063614
02/22/91
63.60
BOYER
TRUCK
PARTS
063814
02/22/91
50.67
BOYER
TRUCK
PARTS
063814
02/22/91
160.86-
BOYER
TRUCK
PARTS
063614
02/22/91
40.03
BOYER
TRUCK
PARTS
063B14
02/22/91
40.08
BOYER
TRUCK
PARTS
063B14
02/22/91
160.86
BOYER
TRUCK
PARTS
063B14
02/22/91
232.51
BOYER
TRUCK
PARTS
063814
02/22/91
90.38
BOYER
TRUCK
PARTS
063614
02/22/91
160.83
BOYER
TRUCK
PARTS
BERTELSON
BROS.
678.10
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42
k k k k k k
063817
02/25/91
34,009.45
BFI RECYCLING SYS
063817
02/25/91
182.40
BFI RECYCLING SYS
898405
3228
34,191.85
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
063B18
02/22/91
377.76
BATTERY
WAREHOUSE
063818
02/22/91
230.12-
BATTERY
WAREHOUSE
063618
02/22/91
68.04
BATTERY
WAREHOUSE
063818
02/22/91
43.20
BATTERY
WAREHOUSE
063818
02/22/91
244.28
BATTERY
WAREHOUSE
063818
02/22/91
99.16
BATTERY
WAREHOUSE
898577
3165
602.32
063630
* k k * * R
ENGINEERING SERVICE
ENGINEERING
* ** -CKS
27- 1300 - 003 -00 5769
41- 4201 - 900 -90 186
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
898077
3149..
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
898405
3228
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
898577
3165
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
897279
3065
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
898017
3065
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
898577
3165
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
896607
2986
SWITCH
10- 4540 - 560 -56
897203
3060
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
898577
3165
RECYCLING CONTRACT 10- 4226- 507 -50 910100
RECYCLING SERVICE 10- 4226- 507 -50 10347
BATTERY
CREDIT
BULBS
BULBS
BULBS
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
10- 4540 - 560 -56
10- 4540- 560 -56
10- 4540 - 560 -56
10- 4540 - 560 -56
27- 4540 - 664 -66
81278
79500
80101 2815
83104 3227
79673 2815
82363 3094
063827
02/26/91
168.53
' BERGFORD
TRUCKING
LIQUOR
DELIVERY
50- 4626- 822 -82
063B27
02/26/91
539.18
BERGFORD
TRUCKING
LIQUOR
DELIVERY
50- 4626 - 842 -84
063B27
02/26/91
441.53
BERGFORD
TRUCKING
LIQUOR
DELIVERY
50- 4626- 862 -86
1,149.24
kkkkkk
063630
02/26/91
161.00
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42
646865 3199
063830
02/26/91
31.39
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42
649734
063630
02/26/91
37.02
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42
649658
063630
02/22/91
89.12
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
: .
063830
02/25/91
86.40
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
OFFICE
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
647297
063B30
02/25/91
47.38
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
649736
063630
02/25/91
171.00
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
645815
063830
02/25/91
11.96
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
SIGN
10 -4504- 520 -52
647472
063830
02/22/91
53.69
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
OFFICE
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 540 -54
645774 2960
063630
02/22/91
28.40
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 560 -56
647297
063830
02/22/91
9.05
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4516 - 440 -44
647297
063B30
02/25/91
31.30
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
12- 4504 - 434 -43
649736
063B30
02/25/91
95.32
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
OFFICE
SUPPLIES
30- 4516- 781 -78
648093 3276
853.03
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
*A * -CK5
1991 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
03 -04 -91
PAGE 9 .
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.
#
MESSAGE
063B31
02/25/91
336.00
BETSY BRYANT
AC INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201 - 611 -61
336.00
063632
02/22/91
476.00
BEST LOCK OF MPLS
KEY SET
10 -4540- 390 -30
012417
3057
063B32
02/22/91
135.35
BEST LOCK OF MPLS
GEN SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
12416
2944
611.35
* * * * **
* * *- CKS
063874
02/25/91
75.00-
BRADLEY SENN
P7R REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 646 -64
063B74
02/25/91
75.00
BRADLEY BENN
P7R REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 646 -64
063B74
02/25/91
75.00
BRADLEY BENN
P &R REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 646 -64
75.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
063682
02/25/91
384.31
BRUNSON INSTRUMENT
SURVEY EQUIP
10 -4504- 260 -26
082955
2458
063B82
02/25/91
96.72
BRUNSON INSTRUMENT
SURVEY EQUIP
10 -4504- 260 -26
082953
2458
481.03
* * * * **
* ** -CK5_.
063C01
02/25/91
216.50
C & S DISTRIBUTING
COST /GOODS SOLD
23- 4624- 613 -61
119667
3179
216.50
* * *w **
*w* -CKS ".
063C05
02/22/91
45.00
CAMPBELL -RALPH
BOOKS
10- 4502 - 140 -14
45.00
063C16
02/22/91
160.88
'CATCO
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
365523
3212
160.88
063C17
02/22/91
93.87
CDP
RENTAL
10- 4504 - 540 -54
93.87
063C22
02/22/91
36.72
CERT POWER TRAIN
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
73653
3059
36.72
* * * * *w
* *r_CK5
063C25
02/26/91
52.05
CHAPIN PUBLISHING
ADVERTISING
30- 4214 - 781 -78
3469
52.05
* * * * **
* **- CKS
063C33
02/25/91
182.58
CITY OF EDINA
WATER
10- 4258 - 446 -44
063C33
02/25/91
28.64
CITY OF EDINA
WATER
10- 4258 - 646 -64
211.22
* * * **
* ** -CKS
1991 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
03 -04 -91
PAGE 10
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P..O. #::MESSAGE
063C35
02/22/91
214.40
CITYLINE
ADVERTISING
30- 4214 - 781 -78
797
3337
214.40
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
063C60
02/26/91
45.50
CONSTR FASTENING SYS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
15166
45.50
063C89
02/22/91
53.10
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
47270.
3106
063C89
02/22/91
93.35
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540- 664 -66
47236
3100..
146.45
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
063C93
02/22/91
3,420.13
CERT HYD SPEC
REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560-56
84288
2661
3,420.13
K
063C97
02/22/91
181.43
CYLINDER CITY
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
30123
3133
181.43
* * * * **
* ** -CKS ::.
063D07
02/25/91
83.50
D.C. HEY CO.
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
23- 4248 - 612 -61
220529
3265
063D07
02/26/91
29.65
D.C. HEY CO.
SERVICE CONTRACT
30- 4288 - 781 -78
3470
113.15
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
063D26
02/25/91
126.00
TOBIE DICKER
PT MAINT AC
23- 4120 - 612 -61
063D26
02/25/91
966.00
'TOBIE DICKER
AC INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201 - 611 -61
1,092.00
* * * * **
*.* -CKS
063D36
02/25/91
502.00
BILL DIETRICHSON
AC INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201 - 611 -61
502.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
063D52
02/25/91
286.25
DISCOM OF MN INC
MAINT. CONTRACTT
10- 4294 - 560 -56
10814
286.25
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
063E14
02/25/91
285.56
EARL F. ANDERSON
REFURBISH SIGNS
10- 4542 - 325 -30
103807
2800
063E14
02/26/91
61.34
EARL F. ANDERSON
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
3332
346.90
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
063E20
02/22/91
25.00
ECOLAB PEST ELIM.
SERVICE CONTRACTS
30- 4288 - 782 -78
P29485
3338
1991 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
063E20
02/22/91
063E20
02/22/91
k *N * *N
063E51
02/26/91
063E51
02/26/91
k k N k k k
063E60
02/22/91
k k * * k k
063E73
02/26/91
063E75
02/22/91
063E97
02/22/91
* * * * **
063F11
02/25/91
063F11
02/25/91
063F11
02/25/91
k k k N k*
063F26
02/26/91
N k N k k*
063F73
02/25/91
k* k k k N
063F99
02/25/91 '
063F99
02/25/91
* *NN *N
063G20
02/26/91
AMOUNT
85.00
25.00-
85.00 *
289.00
237.00
526.00 *
210.24
210.24 *
27.88
27.88 *
300.00
300.00 *
3,975.00
3,975.00 *
255.00
788.00
625.34
1,668.34 *
347.89
347.89 *
396.00
396.00 *'
45.00
24.00
69.00
145.23
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ECOLAB PEST ELIM. SERVICE CONTRACTS
ECOLAB PEST ELIM. SERVICE CONTRACTS
EGGHEAD DIS SOFTWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES
EGGHEAD DIS SOFTWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES
ELECTRIC MOTOR REP
EMER MED. PRODUCTS
EMPLOYEES CLUB
E -Z -GO TEXTRON
FEED RITE CONTROL
FEED RITE CONTROL
FEED RITE CONTROL
FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL
SUSAN FRAME
AGNES FINE
AGNES FINE
GENE SCARS SUPPLY
REPAIR
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
RANGER GOLF CAR
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
WATER CHEMICAL
REPAIR PARTS
AC INSTRUCTOR
AC INSTRUCTOR
CRAFT SUPPLIES /AC
REPAIRS
03 -04 -91 PAGE 11
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. #.MESSAGE
30- 4288 - 782 -78 P29485 3338
30- 4288 - 782 -78 P29485 3338
* ** -CKS
10- 4504- 600 -60
27- 4504- 661 -66
* ** -CKS
28- 4248 - 702 -70 140685 3082
* ** -CKS
10- 4510- 440 -44 083441 2741
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 500 -50
* ** -.CKS
27- 1340 - 000 -00 930681 1964
* ** -CKS
40- 4504 - 805 -80 152763 2862
40- 4504 - 805 -80 152761 3237
40- 4622 - 805 -80 152736 7342
* ** -CKS
40- 4540 - 810 -80 4331 2648
* ** -CKS
23- 4201 - 611 -61
* ** -CKS
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4588 - 611 -61
* ** -CKS
29- 4248 - 722 -72 015114 2061
1991 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK
REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
145.23 *
* * * * **
063G32
02/22/91
165.00
GOPHER STATE 1 CALL
JAN SERVICE
165.00 *
* * * * **
063G44
02/25/91
50.00
GLEN SIPE PIANO
SERV
SERVICE CONTRACT
50.00 *
063657
02/25/91
242.00
GOPHER OIL CO.
REPAIR
063G57
02/25/91
201.53
GOPHER OIL CO.
REPAIR
443.53 *
* * * * **
063G68
02/25/91
31.25-
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC
CO.
CONNECTORS
063068
02/25/91
54.36-
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC
CO.
TOOLS
063G68
02/25/91
233.91
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC
CO.
BALLAST
148.30 *
* * * * **
063G70
02/25/91
400.00
MARGARET GUST
AC INSTRUCTOR
063G70
02/25/91
39.00
MARGARET GUST
CRAFT SUPPLIES /AC
439.00 *
063G88
02/25/91
300.00
'PAT GEISHEKER
AC INSTRUCTOR
300.00 *
* * * * **
063G93
02/25/91
540.00
JEAN GRAPP
AC INSTRUCTOR
540.00 *
* * * * **
063G95
02/25/91
160.00
KATHY GUSTAFSON
AC INSTRUCTOR
160.00 *
* * * * **
063H06
02/25/91
137.00
PHYLLIS HAYWA
AC INSTRUCTOR
137.00 *
* * * * **
063H21
02/22/91
172.71
HARMON GLASS
WINDSHIELD
172.71 *
03 -04 -91 PAGE 12
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
10- 4318 - 280 -28 191191 3229
30- 4288 - 782 -78 910222 3400
*k*- CKS
28- 4248- 704 -70 422156 3187
28- 4248 - 704 -70 421788
* ** -CKS
10- 4540 - 520 -52 232866 2799
10- 4540- 520 -52 234365 2963
10- 4540 - 646 -64 232254 2802
* "- CKS;, >.::;
23 -4201- 611 -61
23- 4588 - 611 -61
* - CKS `':.
23- 4201 - 611 -61
* ** -CKS
23- 4201 - 611 -61
* ** -CKS
23- 4201 - 611 -61
* ** -CKS
23- 4201 - 611 -61
* ** -CKS
10- 4248 - 560 -56 3155
1991 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
12.72
HENN CTY SHERIFF
063H32
02/25/91
063H33
02/26/91
063H33
02/26/91
063H33
02/26/91
063H34
02/26/91
34.78
HERMAN MILLER INC.
063H42
02/25/91
063H42
02/26/91
063H42
02/25/91
53.66
HIRSHFIELDS
063H56
02/22/91
* * k * * *
EVIE HOLMQUIST
063H58
02/25/91
063H58
02/25/91
* k k * * k
'HARRY HEIM
063H70
02/25/91
063I71
02/26/91
* * * * **
*
063I74
02/22/91
* * * * **
*
063J23
02/22/91
*kk * **
*
063J27
02/25/91
CHECK REGISTER
AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
36.15
HEDGES -DIANA
36.15
*
12.72
HENN CTY SHERIFF
240.97
HENN CTY SHERIFF
231.00
HENN CTY SHERIFF
484.69
*
1,292.10
HENN COUNTY TREAS.
1,292.10
*
34.78
HERMAN MILLER INC.
9.63
HERMAN MILLER INC.
257.61
HERMAN MILLER INC.
302.02
*
53.66
HIRSHFIELDS
53.66
*
405.00
EVIE HOLMQUIST
28.99
EVIE HOLMQUIST
433.99
*
180.00
'HARRY HEIM
180.00
*
224.85
IDELLES INTER DESN
224.85
*
3,116.00
IOS
3,116.00
*
35.50
JR JOHNSON SUP
35.50
*
28.90
JERRYS FOODS
28.90
*
AC ADVERTISING
EQUIP MAINT
WORKHOUSE /JAIL
EQUIP
CONSTRUTION
REMODELING
REMODELING
REMODELING
PAINT SUPPLIES
AC INSTRUCTOR
CRAFT SUPPLIES
AC INSTRUCTOR
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FAX
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
03 -04 -91 PAGE 13
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
23- 4214 - 611 -61
10- 4274 - 420 -42
10- 4286 - 220 -22
10- 4901 - 420 -42
60- 1300 - 285 -04
* ** -CKS
25- 4924 - 520 -52 570609 2392
25- 4924 - 520 -52 551509
25- 4924 - 520 -52 570608 2442
* * * -CKS
10- 4540 - 540 -54 246270 2988
* ** -CKS '.
23- 4201 - 611 -61
23- 4588 - 611 -61
* ** -CKS
23- 4201 - 611 -61
30- 4504 - 782 -78 249771 3467
-CKS.
10- 4902 - 500 -50 A06230 2856
* ** -CKS
30- 4504 - 782 -78 12442
* ** -CKS
23- 4504 - 611 -61
* ** -CKS
1991 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
03 -04 -91 PAGE 14
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. #MESSAGE: :; >::::>r.
063J31
02/22/91
68.36
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 301 -30
063J31
02/22/91
50.33
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 301 -30
063J31
02/22/91
23.16
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 322 -30
063J31
02/22/91
2.82
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 420 -42
063J31
02/22/91
41.40
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42
063J31
02/22/91
85.55
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 440 -44
063J31
02/22/91
7.08
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 480 -48
063J31
02/22/91
17.36
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 482 -48
063J31
02/22/91
9.37
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 507 -50
063J31
02/22/91
16.69
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 520 -52
063J31
02/22/91
24.63
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 540 -54
063J31
02/22/91
112.10
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 560 -56
063J31
02/22/91
195.02
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
063J31
02/22/91
58.79
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 648 -64
063J31
02/22/91
37.82
JERRYS
HARDWARE
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
063J31
02/22/91
53.95
JERRYS
HARDWARE
PAINT
10- 4544- 646 -64
063J31
02/22/91
54.51
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 661 -66
063J31
02/22/91
73.30
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 667 -66
063J31
02/22/91
21.16
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
29- 4504 - 722 -72
063J31
02/22/91
127.98
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782-78
063J31
02/22/91
67.04
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
40- 4504- 801 -80
063J31
02/22/91
72.87
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
40- 4504 - 801 -80
063J31
02/22/91
76.99
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
40- 4504 - 803 -80
063J31
02/22/91
22.57
JERRYS
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
50- 4504 - 841 -84
1,320.85
* ** -CKS
063J35
02/26/91
53.95
JERRYS
PRINTING
PRINTING
29- 4600 - 721 -72
5673 3419
53.95
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
063J41
02/22/91
406.32
'JIM HATCH
SALES
FENCE
30- 4504 - 784 -78
12153 2596
406.32
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
063J99
02/26/91
40.00
'JANET CANTON
MILEAGE
10- 4208 - 160 -16
40.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
063K05
02/22/91
71.13
K & K
SALES
REPAIR
28- 4248 - 702 -70
58099 3091
71.13
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
063K09
02/22/91
7.53
KAMAN
INDUST TECH
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
3020
063K09
02/22/91
48.98
KAMAN
INDUST TECH
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
3020
063K09
02/25/91
124.74
KAMAN
INDUST TECH
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 646 -64
3274
063K09
02/22/91
56.49
KAMAN
INDUST TECH
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 646 -64
698447 3020
063K09
02/25/91
19.16
KAMAN
INDUST TECH
BEARINGS
50- 4540 - 841 -84
698494 3071
256.90
*
1991 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
* * * * **
063K35
02/22/91
063K35
02/25/91
063K35
02/22/91
063K35
02/25/91
063K35
02/26/91
063K35
02/25/91
063K35
02/22/91
063K35
02/22/91
063K35
02/26/91
* * * * **
063K97
02/25/91
* * * * **
063L01
02/25/91
063L01
02/25/91
* * * * **
063L28
02/25/91
063L28
02/25/91
063L28
02/22/91
063L28
02/25/91
063L28
02/22/91
063L28
02/25/91
063L28
02/25/91
063L28
02/25/91 '
063L28
02/25/91
063L28
02/25/91
063L28
02/25/91
063L28
02/22/91
063L28
02/25/91
063L28
02/22/91
063L28
02/25/91
* * * * **
06306 02/25/91
AMOUNT
88.68
7.34
86.94
28.68
20.80
162.42
163.01
4.18
35.92
597.97
20.00
20.00
615.00
152.48
767.48
148.50
148.50-
306.92
205.39
51.26
312.64
420.02
2.81
329.88
148.50
432.06
216.94
459.73
493.43
460.47
3,840.05
145.00
145.00
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KNOX COMM CREDIT
KANDIYOHI /WATER
LINDA KOZAK
LINDA KOZAK
LAWSON PRODUCTS
LAWSON PRODUCTS
LAWSON PRODUCTS
LAWSON PRODUCTS
LAWSON PRODUCTS
LAWSON PRODUCTS
' LAWSON PRODUCTS
' LAWSON PRODUCTS
LAWSON PRODUCTS
LAWSON PRODUCTS
LAWSON PRODUCTS
LAWSON PRODUCTS
LAWSON PRODUCTS
LAWSON PRODUCTS
LAWSON PRODUCTS
LEFFLER PRINTING
*** * **
063L46 02/26/91 60.13 LIEN INFECTION CON
60.13
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PLYWOOD
HARDWARE
AMMUNITION
MATERIAL
LUMBER
LUMBER
REPAIRS
PRO SERV
03 -04 -91 PAGE 15
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O: # MESSAGE
* * * -CKS
10- 4504 - 646 -64 823717 3137
10- 4504 - 646 -64
10- 4540- 540 -54
10- 4540 - 646 -64
10- 4572 - 420 -42
10- 4580 - 301 -30
10- 4604 - 646 -64
10- 4604 - 646 -64
28- 4248 - 702 -70
23- 4201 - 612 -61
SERVICES /EDINBOROUGH 30- 4201- 781 -78
REIMBURSEEMENT 30- 4504 - 783 -78
NUTS /BOLTS
NUTS /BOLTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BRUSHES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
TORQ /ALLOY
PINS WHEELS/
SPECIAL
REPAIR PARTS
NUTS /BOLTS
DRILLS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
HEAT GUN
PRINTING
SANITATION
801302 3244
823714 3142
720108 3215
807897
720486 2979
808296 3075
792704 3143
801120 3333
10- 4320 - 560 -56 485705 2792
10- 4320 - 560 -56 485705 2792
10- 4504 - 301 -30 2878
10- 4504 - 301 -30 485702 2588
10- 4504 - 322 -30 2875
10- 4504 - 322 -30 485703 2791
10- 4504- 325 -30 485707 2794
10- 4504 - 560 -56 484880
10- 4504 - 646 -64 485706 2793
10- 4620 - 560 -56 485705 2792
10- 4620 - 560 -56 485704 2792
40- 4504 - 801 -80 2877
40 -4540- 801 -80 484879 2789
40- 4540- 803 -80 2876
40- 4580 - 803 -80 486535 2790
30- 4600 - 781 -78 4551 3351
27- 4201 - 663 -66 2698
1991 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
063L48
02/26/91
1,896.00
LIGHTING RESOURCES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,896.00
*
kkkkkk
063L54
02/25/91
268.38
LUNDS
SNOW PLOWING
268.38
*
kkkkkk
063L56
02/22/91
50.50
LINHOFF
ADVERTISING
k k k k k k
50.50
063L60
.02/25/91
18.20
LOGIS
COMPUTER SERVICES
063L60
02/25/91
5,972.09
LOGIS
COMPUTER SERVICES
063L60
02/22/91
3,144.76
LOGIS
HOMESTEAD CARDS
063L60
02/25/91
4,889.62
LOGIS
COMPUTER SERVICES
063L60
02/25/91
7,282.78
LOGIS
COMPUTER SERVICES
063L60
02/25/91
2,967.68
LOGIS
COMPUTER SERVICES
063L60
02/25/91
597.85
LOGIS
COMPUTER SERVICES
063L60
02/25/91
597.86
LOGIS
COMPUTER SERVICES
063L60
02/25/91
597.86
LOGIS
COMPUTER SERVICES
26,068.70
063L84
02/25/91
180.00
NICK LEGEROS
AC INSTRUCTOR
180.00
*
k k k k k k
063L98
02/25/91 .
215.90
'MIDWEST MACHINERY
KNIFE
215.90
*
k k k k k k
063M12
02/25/91
14.24
MATHISON CO.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
14.24
*
k k k k k k
063M19
02/22/91
9.66
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
063M19
02/22/91
44.52
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
063M19
02/22/91
3,218.43
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
063M19
02/22/91
152.00
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
TOOLS
063M19
02/22/91
15.12
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
TOOLS
063M19
02/22/91
894.21
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
PARTS
063M19
02/22/91
278.16
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
4,612.10
kkkkkk
063M22
02/22/91
83.21
MCNEILUS STEEL
STEEL
03 -04 -91 PAGE 16
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
30- 4504 - 782 -78 2832
50- 4201 - 821 -82 13210
30- 4214 - 781 -78 186242 3340
10- 1145 - 000 -00 019127
10- 4233 - 160 -16 019108
10- 4233 - 200 -20 1950
10- 4233 - 200 -20 019108
10- 4233 - 420 -42 019108
40- 4233 - 800 -80 019108
50- 4233 - 820 -82 019108
50- 4233- 840 -84
50- 4233 - 860 -86
23- 4201 - 611 -61
10- 4540 - 560 -56 P02973 289E
23- 4504 - 611 -61 680467 3175
10- 4504- 390 -30
10- 4504 - 560 -56
10- 4540- 560 -56
10- 4580 - 440 -44
10- 4580 - 560 -56
10- 4620 - 560 -56
40- 4504- 801 -80
........................
* *" -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
k k 1M - CK §'.�'�>
10- 4620 - 560 -56 109201 2805
1991 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
kkk *k*
063M27
063M27
063M27
063M27
063M27
063M27
063M27
063M27
063M27
063M27
063M27
063M27
063M27
063M27
063M27
kkk * *k
063M29
063M29
k k k k k k
063M32
063M32
063M32
063M32
k *A * **
063M35
kkk * **
063M46
063M46
063M46
k k k k k k
063M49
* ** *k*
063M68
CHECK REGISTER
AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
83.21
03 -04 -91 PAGE 17
ACCOUNT NO. INV: # P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
02/25/91
199'.50
MERIT SUPPLY
LABEL STRIPPER
10- 4504-325 -30
26211
2970
02/22/91
104.25
MERIT SUPPLY
LINERS
10- 4504 - 325 -30
26258
3064
02/25/91
379.00
MERIT SUPPLY
ICE MELT
10- 4512 - 540 -54
26182
2959
02/22/91
469.60
MERIT SUPPLY
ICE MELT
10- 4520 - 318 -30
26272
3154
02/22/91
438.00
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
10- 4620 - 560 -56
26256
3144
02/25/91
234.00
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
10- 4620 - 560 -56
26172
2891
02/25/91
189.00
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
23- 4512 - 612 -61
26257
3145
02/26/91
138.00
MERIT SUPPLY
SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 664 -66
26345
3329
02/22/91
101.70
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING
27 -4512- 662 -66
26279
3203
02/22/91
486.70
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30 -4504- 782 -78
26295
3258
02/22/91
495.10
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
26239
3277
02/22/91
443.70
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
26238
3277
02/22/91
909.00
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 783 -78
26273
3022
02/25/91
147.80
MERIT SUPPLY
PAINT
40 -4504- 801 -80
26181
2958
02/25/91
147.80
MERIT SUPPLY
PAINT
40 -4504- 803 -80
26230
2987
4,883.15
* * *- CKS,,.,
02/22/91
401.60
MESSERLI & KRAMER
AMULLANCE COLLECT
.10- 3180 - 000 -00
02/22/91
36.00
MESSERLI & KRAMER
AMULLANCE COLLECT
10- 3180 - 000 -00
437.60
* ** -CKS
02/22/91
324.57
M AMUNDSON
CIGARETTES
50- 4632 - 822 -82
3306
02/22/91
392.42
M AMUNDSON
CIGARETTES
50 -4632- 842 -84
3328
02/22/91
219.96
M AMUNDSON
CIGARETTES
50 -4632- 862 -86
3307
02/26/91
125.28
M AMUNDSON
CIGARETTES
50- 4632 - 862 -86
3441
1,062.23
*** -CKS
02/22/91
226,698.00
METRO WASTE CONTROL
SEWER SERVICE
40- 4312 - 812 -80
226,698.00
* ** -C KS
02/22/91
18.61
METZ BAKING CO
BREAD
27- 4624 - 663 -66
02/26/91
4.52
METZ BAKING CO
BREAD
27- 4624- 663 -66
2700
02/26/91
17.60
METZ BAKING CO
COST OF GOODS
28- 4624 - 703 -70
40.73 *'
* ** -CKS
02/26/91
22.56
MATRX MEDICAL INC
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
10- 4510 - 440 -44
169083
1803
22.56
* * * - CKS.. .
02/25/91
50.85
MN CELLULAR PHONE
CAR PHONE
10- 4204 - 100 -10
1991 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
03 -04 -91 PAGE 18. .<
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
063M68
02/25/91
88.87
MN
CELLULAR PHONE
CAR PHONE
10- 4204 - 140 -14
063M68
02/26/91
62.70
MN
CELLULAR PHONE
EQUIP
RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
063M68
02/26/91
62.42
MN
CELLULAR PHONE
EQUIP
RENTAL
10- 4226- 420 -42
063M68
02/26/91
294.17
MN
CELLULAR PHONE
EQUIP
RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
063M68
02/26/91
11.87
MN
CELLULAR PHONE
EQUIP
RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
063M68
02/26/91
47.61
MN
CELLULAR PHONE
EQUIP
RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
063M68
02/26/91
164.75
MN
CELLULAR PHONE
EQUIP
RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
063M68
02/26/91
115.35
MN
CELLULAR PHONE
EQUIP
RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
063M68
02/26/91
10.36
MN
CELLULAR PHONE
EQUIP
RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
063M68
02/26/91
64.69
MN
CELLULAR PHONE
EQUIP
RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
063M68
02/26/91
10.40
MN
CELLULAR PHONE
EQUIP
RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
063M68
02/26/91
9.58
MN
CELLULAR PHONE
EQUIP
RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
063M68
02/26/91
26.35
MN
CELLULAR PHONE
EQUIP
RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
1,019.97
063M69
02/25/91
225.95
MCC
/MIDWEST
COST /GOODS
SOLD
23- 4624 - 613 -61
51482 1828
225.95
* * *- CKS.
063M81
02/22/91
60.00
MN.
TORO INC.
TRAINING
10- 4202 - 640 -64
172032 3141
063M81
02/22/91
489.86
MN.
TORO INC.
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540- 646 -64
171838 3196
063M81
02/22/91
105.78
MN.
TORO INC.
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540- 646 -64
171661 3168
063M81
02/25/91
21.87
MN.
TORO INC.
REPAIR
PARTS
27 -4540- 664 -66
170627 2822
063M81
02/25/91
11.73
MN.
TORO INC.
REPAIR
PARTS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
171473 3168
689.24
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
063M85
02/22/91
50.30
MN.
WANNER
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
76868
50.30
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
063M93
02/26/91
89.46
'MOTOROLA
INC
BATTERIES
10- 4504 - 440 -44
2744
89.46
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
063M97
02/25/91
3,377.42
MPLS
FINANCE DEPT.
WATER
40- 4640 - 803 -80
3,377.42
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
063N07
02/25/91
33.63
MTS
NW SOUND
CLIPS
10- 4504 - 520 -52
90049 2015 .
063N07
02/26/91
239.00
MTS
NW SOUND
REPAIR
PARTS
30- 4540 - 782 -78
272.63
* * * * **
* * *- CKS ..
063N09
02/25/91
189.00
MUNICILITE
CO.
LIGHTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
2736 2957
063N09
02/25/91
370.00
MUNICILITE
CO.
FOG LIGHTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
2701 2405
559.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
1991 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
063N13
02/26/91
063N13
02/26/91
kkkkkk
063N16
02/22/91
063N16
02/22/91
063N16
02/22/91
kkkkkk
30- 4252- 782 -78
063N31
02/22/91
063N31
02/22/91
k k k k k k
063N36
02/22/91
kk *kkk
033833 3102
063N72
02/22/91
k k k k k k
063N82
02/25/91
k k k k k k
063N88
02/25/91
kkkkkk
27- 4504 - 664 -66
063N96
02/22/91
kkkkkk
063017
02/26/91
063017
02/26/91
kkkkkk
063099
02/25/91
k k k k k k
AMOUNT
47.80
47.80
95.60 *
1,496.02
514.29
54.62
2,064.93 *
216.90
228.40
445.30 *
87.15
87.15 *
1,448.01
1,448.01 *
191.07
191.07 *
533.00
533.00 *
76.00
76.00 *
149.50
1,185.00
1,334.50 *
192.00
192.00 *
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
MUZAK ADVERTISING
MUZAK ADVERTISING
NSP
NSP
NSP
NERCO DISTRIBUTING
NERCO DISTRIBUTING
NORTHERN
POWER /LIGHT
POWER /LIGHT
POWER /LIGHT
COST OF GOODS SOLD
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GENERAL SUPPLIES
NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES
NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY
J THOMAS NELSON
MINN COMM PAGING
OFFICE PRODUCTS
OFFICE PRODUCTS
DOROTHY ODLAND
COST /GOODS SOLD
AC INSTRUCTOR
SERVICE CONTRACTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIP
AC INSTRUCTOR
03 -04 -91
PAGE 19
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O: #
MESSAGE:.
50- 4214 - 822 -82
50- 4214 - 862 -86
xk *- CKS.::;,
10- 4252 - 375 -30
;<
30- 4252- 782 -78
40- 4252 - 801 -80
28- 4624 - 703 -70
033833 3102
28- 4624 - 703 -70
34101 3250
*** CKS
27- 4504 - 664 -66
432590 3249.
* ** -CKS
10- 4616- 560 -56
* ** -CKS
23- 4624 - 613 -61
181476 3173
kxk -CKS
23- 4201- 611 -61
* ** -CKS
30- 4288 - 782 -78
10 -4504- 600 -60
133325 2992
10- 4902 - 600 -60
133103 2992
xxx CI(S
23- 4201 - 611 -61
1991 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE _ AMOUNT
063P32
02/26/91
263.89
* ** -CKS
GENERAL
263.89
xxxxxx
41453
063P35
02/22/91
100.00
063P35
02/25/91
5.00
063P35
02/25/91
90.23
063P35
02/25/91
11.40
063P35
02/25/91
41.92
063P35
02/25/91
16.94
063P35
02/25/91
15.67
10- 4540 - 560 -56
38253 2981
281.16
xxxxxx
063P44
02/25/91
14,985.30
14,985.30
x x x x x x
063P46
02/25/91
408.78
408.78
xxxxxx
063P48
02/25/91
9.20
9.20
xxxxxx
063P78
02/25/91
65.00
65.00 *
xxxxxx
063P84
02/26/91
6.00
6.00 *
xxxxxx
063Q09
02/26/91
145.00
145.00 *
xxxxxx
063Q20
02/22/91
165.22
063Q20
02/22/91
51.22 -
063Q20
02/22/91
92.94
206.94
*:5 063
02/25/91
312.00
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
PERA INTEREST PENALTY
PETERSON- BARBARA
PETERSON- BARBARA
PETERSON- BARBARA
PETERSON- BARBARA
PETERSON- BARBARA
PETERSON- BARBARA
PETERSON - BARBARA
PHYSIO CONTROL
INCREASE PETTY CASH
DUES
MILEGAGE
UNIFORMS
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
LIFEPAK
PIONEER RIM & WHEEL HITCHES
PIP PRINTING
PRINTERS SERV INC
PRO INSTANT PRINT
QUALITY REFRIG
QUICK SERV BATTERY
QUICK SERV BATTERY
QUICK SERV BATTERY
MONICA RUDQUIST
PRINTING
SHARPENING
03 -04 -91 PAGE 20
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
10- 4145 - 510 -51
................
* ** -CKS
30 -1030- 000 -00
30- 4202 - 781 -78
30- 4208 - 781 -78
30- 4262- 782 -78
30- 4504 - 781 -78
30- 4504 - 782 -78
30- 4516 - 781 -78
* ** -CKS
10- 4901 - 440 -44 665192 1798
*x *_CKS
10- 4540 - 560 -56 196392 3128
x x x - CKS
30- 4600- 781 -78 3348
28- 4274 - 704 -70 58682
x * * - CKS `..
* ** -CKS
PT MAINT AC 23- 4120 - 612 -61
* ** -CKS
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 490 -49
41453
* ** -CKS
MAINT
27- 4288 - 663 -66
108125
* ** -CKS
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540- 560 -56
52940 2511
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
90426
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
38253 2981
* ** -CKS
PT MAINT AC 23- 4120 - 612 -61
1991 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
063R15
02/25/91
729.00
1,041.00
wxxxwx
063R22
02/22/91
462.50
063R22
02/26/91
286.14
01325
748.64
xxwwwx
063R25
02/25/91
132.80
063R25
02/22/91
99.60
063R25
02/26/91
392.95
10- 4901 - 650 -64
1994
625.35
xwwxxw
063R35
02/22/91
135.00
2757
2113
135.00
xxxwwx
063R43
02/22/91
132.17
3245
132.17
xwxwx
063R53
02/22/91
425.00
425.00
xwwwxx
w *x CKS
10- 4612 - 560 -56
063R65
02/22/91
3,570.00
063R65
02/22/91
2,712.50
6,282.50
wxwwww
**k-CKS
30- 4288 - 782 -78
063R73
02/25/91
51.25
51.25
wwxwxx
23- 4588 - 611 -61
186630
063R81
02/22/91
98.08
98'.08
wxwwwx
64778
2796
063R83
02/22/91
828.00
w w w- CKS
828.00
wxwwww
063S07
02/22/91
9.99
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
MONICA RUDQUIST AC INSTRUCTOR
REM SUPPLIES
REM SUPPLIES
RENTAL EQUIP & SALES
RENTAL EQUIP & SALES
RENTAL EQUIP & SALES
RICHFIELD PLUMB CO
RITEWAY
ROBERT B. HILL
,ROLLINS OIL CO
'ROLLINS OIL CO
'ROTO ROOTER SERV
RUBENSTEIN & ZIFF
RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON
SPRUCE CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
CHAIN SAW
REPAIR
REPAIR PARTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GASOLINE
GASOLINE
SERVICE
CRAFT SUPPLIES
REPAIR PARTS
LAUNDRY
03 -04 -91
PAGE ii:
ACCOUNT NO,. I,NV; # P. 0_ # MESSAGE ;;
23- 4201 - 611 -61
K.
30 -4504- 782 -78
1385
3335
30- 4504 - 782 -78
01325
xwx CKS
10- 4540- 644 -64
1984
3070
10- 4540 - 644 -64
1908.
2973.
=:
10- 4901 - 650 -64
1994
3298
28 -4248- 702 -76
2757
2113
ww* -CKS .:
10- 4540 - 560 -56
35624M
3245
28- 4504 - 702 -70
44121
3426
w *x CKS
10- 4612 - 560 -56
10- 4612- 560 -56
**k-CKS
30- 4288 - 782 -78
108893
* ** -CKS
23- 4588 - 611 -61
186630
3176
* ** -CKS
40- 4540 - 801 -80
64778
2796
w w w- CKS
30 -4262- 782 -78
212540
1991 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
063507
02/22/91
* * * * **
SUBURBAN
063521
02/25/91
* * * * **
CHEVROLET
063525
02/22/91
* * * * **
43.58
063527
02/22/91
063527
02/22/91
063527
02/22/91
* * * * **
063545
02/25/91
136.03
SUBURBAN
063554
02/25/91
* * * * **
CHEVROLET
063S72
02/26/91
1063S72
02/26/91
063573
02/22/91
* * * * **
SUBURBAN
063577
02/25/91
063577
02/22/91
063577
02/22/91
063577
02/22/91
063577
02/25/91
063577
02/25/91
063577
02/25/91
063577
02/22/91
063577
02/22/91
063577
02/22/91
063578
02/26/91
063578
02/26/91
AMOUNT
81.75
91.74
875.00
875.00
111.00
111.00
9.99
220.72
31.26
261.97
69.36
69.36
584.00
584.00
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
SPRUCE CO LAUNDRY
B SIEWERT CREATNS ADVERTISING
OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC COST OF GOODS
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
ST. PAUL BOOK
STAR TRIBUNE
18.75 STREICHERS
37.75 STREICHERS
56.50 *
461.89 STRGAR - ROSCOE -FAUSH
461.89 *
22.09
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
142.00
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
93.68
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
14.75
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
16.45
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
43.58
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
63.12
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
51.54
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
136.03
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
42.86
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
626.10
64.26
SUBURBAN
PLUMB SUP
29.19
SUBURBAN
PLUMB SUP
BLINDS
PAINT
PAINT
OFFICE SUPPLIES
ADVERTISING
AMMUNITION
AMMUNITION
PRO ENG SERVICES
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
03 -04 -91 PAGE 22
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O.:.* MESSAGE
30- 4262 - 782 -78 145503 3339
30- 4600 - 781 -78 829A 3324
28- 4624 - 703 -70 4H7327 3016
10- 4540 - 540 -54 7744 -6 3151
10- 4542 - 325 -30 2984 -9 3146
10- 4544 - 646 -64 3118 -3 3225
10- 4504 - 540 -54 35706 3130
27- 4214 - 667 -66 3190
10- 4572 - 420 -42
10- 4572 - 420 -42
60- 1300 - 291 -04
10- 4540- 560 -56
10- 4540 - 560 -56
10- 4540 - 560 -56
10- 4540 - 560 -56
10- 4540- 560 -56
10- 4540- 560 -56
10- 4540 - 560 -56
10- 4540 - 560 -56
10- 4540 - 560 -56
10- 4540 - 560 -56
30- 4540 - 782 -78
30- 4540 - 782 -78
140488
140847
140749
140670
140443
140481
140362
140773
140724
140844
1945
3101
* * *- CKS
* ** -CKS
* * * -CK5
1991 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
03 -04 -91
PAGE 23
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. #
MESSAGE; <i....i
93.45
063S95
02/22/91
429.56
SERVICE SALES CORP
MONARCH LABELS
50- 4516 - 820 -82
42852
2855
063S95
02/22/91
429.56
SERVICE SALES CORP
MOARCH LABELS
50 -4516- 840 -84
42852
2855
063S95
02/22/91
429.56
SERVICE SALES CORP
MOARCH LABELS
50- 4516- 860 -86
42852
2855
1,288.68
* * * * **
* ** -CKS°
063T13
02/26/91
218.40
TOM HORWATH
FORESTRY
10- 4201 - 644 -64
063T13
02/26/91
624.00
TOM HORWATH
TRIMMING
10- 4201 - 980 -64
842.40
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
063T40
02/22/91
29.33
TOLL COMPANY
TOOLS
30 -4580- 782 -78
109775
2627
29.33
* * * * **
* * *- CKS_..
063T66
02/22/91
6.50
TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT
CRAFT SUPPLIES
23- 4588 - 611 -61
419560
2721
6.50
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
063T96
02/25/91
86.00
TWIN CITY GAR. DOOR
REPAIR WORK
10- 4540 - 540 -54
15962
3086
86.00
063U05
02/22/91
48.55
US WEST CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
10- 4256- 510 -51
063U05
02/22/91
31.71
'US WEST CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
30- 4256 - 782 -78
80.26
* * * ***
* * *- CKS'.,.
063008
02/26/91
40.00
UNIFORM UNLIMITED
SHIRTS
10- 4266 7440 -44
15159 .2745
40.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS'
063U14
02/25/91
29.00
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
PLUGS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
107900
3058
063014
02/22/91
89.77
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 540 -54
3206
118.77
*'
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
063U17
02/25/91
188.00
UHL CO
CALIBRATION TEST
10- 4540 - 540 -54
60976
8131
188.00
* * * * **
* ** -CKS:
063U20
02/26/91
45.00
UNIVERSITY OF MN
SCHOOL
10 -4202- 640 -64
1991 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
03 -04 -91
PAGE 24
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. #
MESSAGE
063U20
02/26/91
45.00
UNIVERSITY OF MN
SCHOOL
10- 4202 - 640 -64
3321
90.00
kkkkkk
k k " - .CKS. °;;:.:.
063U25
02/26/91
78.49
UNIVERSAL MED SERV
AMBUALANCE EQUIP
10- 4504- 440 -44
4105
2743
78.49
kkkkkk
k k * -CKS�
063V30
02/26/91
63.35
VANTAGE ELECTRIC
REPAIRS
28- 4248 - 702 -70
11498
3254
63.35
kkkkkk
* ** -CKS
063V48
02/22/91
349.79
VOTER REG /ELEC SECT
POSTAGE
10- 4290 - 140 -14
349.79
kkkkkk
" ** -CKS
063W41
02/25/91
870.55
WEST PHOTO
PHOTO SUPPLIES
10- 4508 - 420 -42
16226
3263
870.55
kkkkkk
* ** -CKS
063W66
02/25/91
16.12
WILLIAMS STEEL
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 301 -30
313151
063W66
02/25/91
38.69
WILLIAMS STEEL
SUPPLIES
40- 4540 - 801 -80
315992
54.81
k k k k k k
k R k,- CKS.......
063W99
02/25/91
156.00
CYD WICKER
AC INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201 - 611 -61
156.00
k k k k k k
* ** -CKS.:
063X05
02/25/91
126.00
XEROX CORP
MAINT
10- 4288 - 510 -51
126.00
*
kkkkkk
kkk -CKS
063Z05
02/25/91
106.75
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
3352
106.75
*
kkkkkk
kkk -CK S'.:�.:.
063Z14
02/25/91
16.56
ZIEGLER INC
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
16464
3134
16.56
kkkkkk
kkk - CKS:.;: �:
063Z99
02/25/91
182.00
BOBO ZINN
AC INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201 - 611 -61
182.00
k k k k k k
* ** -CKS
03 -04 -91 PAGE 25
ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
GENERAL FUND
C.D.B.G.
COMMUNICATIONS
ART CENTER
CAPITAL FUND
GOLF COURSE FUND
RECREATION CENTER FUND
GUN RANGE FUND
EDINBOROUGH PARK
UTILITY FUND
STORM SEWER UTILITY
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
CONSTRUCTION FUND
1991 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT
VENDOR
134,871.94
FUND
10
TOTAL
35.00
FUND
11
TOTAL
31.30
FUND
12
TOTAL
9,877.88
FUND
23
TOTAL
1,799.72
FUND
25
TOTAL
8,508.95
FUND
27
TOTAL
2,615.67
FUND
28
TOTAL
220.34
FUND
29
TOTAL
12,146.01
FUND
30
TOTAL
239,001.80
FUND
40
TOTAL
601.14
FUND
41
TOTAL
5,984.43
FUND
50
TOTAL
6,649.99
FUND
60
TOTAL
422,344.17
TOTAL
03 -04 -91 PAGE 25
ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
GENERAL FUND
C.D.B.G.
COMMUNICATIONS
ART CENTER
CAPITAL FUND
GOLF COURSE FUND
RECREATION CENTER FUND
GUN RANGE FUND
EDINBOROUGH PARK
UTILITY FUND
STORM SEWER UTILITY
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
CONSTRUCTION FUND